Baldwin Park City Council
May 7, 2025

3084/038710-0001
22163636.2 a04/30/25

As such, the Appellant respectfully request s that the City Council reject the appeal and approve the Project.

1. Description of the Project
The Applicant seeks to build a 26,244 square foot soccer training facility on two parcels within the City. The Project site currently contains two vacant commercial buildings. The Applicant proposes remodeling one of these buildings to create an indoor soccer field, a meeting room, restrooms, and a gym on the first floor, and four offices, a kitchen, a restroom. The second building will be demolished and a 39-stall parking structure will be built in its place. On the roof of the parking structure, the Applicant proposes constructing three small soccer fields between 3,410 to 3,770 square feet. The Project is not designed to host full scale soccer tournaments or games, but instead, to be a unique training facility for local youth soccer players. Indeed, each of the aforementioned “soccer fields” is roughly half the size of a traditional soccer field, and as such does involve the litany of other types of impacts that would result from a traditionally-sized soccer field.

At its highest point, the Project will be 25 feet—the maximum allowable height in the industrial zone and the same height as the buildings that will remain. The outdoor practice fields will be fenced and screened by decorative wire mes h screening. In addition to the fence, the Project will include a high padded wall along the perimeter of the outdoor practice fields to protect players and to provide greater privacy to both the players and the nearby neighbors. In addition to further screening the practic e fields, this wall will significantly limit noise and light that may be produced by the Project.

To ensure that the Project will not have a detrimental impact on the surrounding properties, the Applicant had a sound study prepared by Impact Sciences that concluded the operations on the Project would fall below the City’s residential noise limits. Similarly, the Applicant submitted a photometric study demonstrating that light impacts to surrounding uses will not be significant.

Finally, the Applicant had a traffic study prepared by a professional traffic engineering firm, Kittleson & Associates, that determined the Project would not result in traffic impacts.

Notwithstanding these findings, the Applicant will install mature trees and plants along the southern portion of the Project to further screen the Project from the adjacent residential uses.

In short, the Project improves upon the property through the addition of a new use to benefit the youth of the community, and includes strict use restrictions to ensure that the Project continues to be used as a soccer training facility. Further, the Project will provide much needed redevelopment in an area that would benefit. Accordingly, the Applicant requests that the City Council deny the appeal and approve the Project.

Honorable Mayor Avila and
Councilmembers Damian, Ayala, Estrada,
and Lozano
April 30, 2025

3084/038710-0001
22163636.2 a04/30/25

2. The Appellant’s Arguments are Without Merit and Can Soundly Be Rejected Unfortunately, after multiple concessions have been given by the Applicant, the Appellant has remained steadfast in her opposition to the Project, and it is clear that no matter what the Applicant does, the Appellant will always oppose the Project regardless of the Project ’s merits.

Indeed, in their appeal, the Appellant has failed to provide any substantial evidence to support any of their claims against the Project. Instead, the Appellant relies on speculation, and conclusory statements to further their desire to simply see the Project rejected. As explained below, each of Appellant’s arguments are without merit, and the Applicant respectfully asks that the City Council reject the Appeal and approve the Project as conditioned by the Planning Commission.

A. The Project Contains Sufficient Parking
The Appellant repeatedly asserts that the Project is under parked and that the proper standard is the “health/fitness club” standard of 1 space/150 square feet of building area. This is incorrect. The specific training use at issue in this case is not called out in the City’s code for the purposes of setting a minimum parking requirement. (See Baldwin Park Municipal Code [“BPMC”] Table 153.150.040.) Instead, per BPMC § 153.150.040(B), the City Planner is entitled to determine the most appropriate parking standards to be applied based on “common functional, product or compatibility characteristics and activities. ” (BPMC § 153.150.040 [ “Off-street parking for unlisted land use. The number of parking spaces required for land uses not specifically listed shall be determined by the City Planner based on common functional, product or compatibility characteristics and activities. Such determination is considered a formal interpretation of the Zoning Code and shall be decided and recorded as such.”].) Accordingly, in this case, City staff exercised its discretion by first looking to the various categories of uses that are contemplated in BPMC Table 153.150.040, and determined that the proposed use is most analogous for the purposes of assessing potential parking needs to a school or education facility, and in using that comparison noted that only 13 parking spaces would be required if the City took that at face value. (See Planning Commission March 26, 2025 Staff Report for Public Hearing No. 1 Regarding Project [“PC Staff Report”], p. 3.) However, both the Applicant and City staff wanted to be sure that the proposed use ’s parking needs were actually met, and after looking at the unique use of the Project, which is limited to a maximum number of employees at any given time with five training areas, which are further limited in the total amount of children that would attend, City staff and thus the Planning Commission recognized that the provision of 39 parking spots would likely be more than reasonably required. (Id.) In other words, by using a use -specific parking analysis, as required by BPMC § 153.150.040, the City required 39 parking spaces – 26 more than the most analogous other use.

Honorable Mayor Avila and
Councilmembers Damian, Ayala, Estrada,
and Lozano
April 30, 2025

3084/038710-0001
22163636.2 a04/30/25

Accordingly, the Project’s provision of 39 parking spaces is more than enough to meet the Project’s needs, and therefore complies with the requirements of BPMC § 153.150.040.

B. The Project Meets the City’s Lot Coverage Requirements Appellant contends that the Project violates the 50% “Lot Coverage” restriction found in BPMC § 153.050.030. Again, this is incorrect. The term “lot coverage” is defined in the BPMC as follows:

LOT COVERAGE. The percentage of the total lot area covered by enclosed structures and/or carports, but excluding uncovered steps, driveways, walks, covered patios, terraces and swimming pools. (BPMC § 153.220.130.) Because the proposed parking structure on which the fields are located is not enclosed, it cannot be used in calculating the overall coverage for the purposes of this section.

The Code’s use of “enclosed structure” is significant as the Code regularly distinguishes between enclosed and non- enclosed structures. (Torrey Hills Community Coalition v. City of San Diego (2010) 186 Cal.App.4th 429 [“ It is an elementary rule of construction that effect must be given, if possible, to every word, clause and sentence of a statute .”].) For example, the BPMC’s defin es “open space ” as “[a] area or a lot…which has no building or structure located therein, except for landscaping, walls, fences, patios, swimming pools and other permitted buildings or structures, used exclusively for recreational purposes.” (BPMC § 135.220.160.) Unlike the “lot coverage ” definition, the “open space ” definition does not distinguish between enclosed and non-enclosed structures. Under the law, this distinction must be given effect. (See Torrey Hills, supra, 186 Cal.App.4th 429.) Here, the Project ’s actual lot coverage, including all enclosed structures, is only approximately 26%, well below the 50% requirement for Industrial Zones. (See PC Staff Report, pp. 6-7.)
C. The Project Contains the Required Setbacks
Appellant claims that the Project’s small soccer fields atop the parking structure are improper because they only have a 10 foot setback from the property line adjacent to the residential uses. In support of this contention, Appellant points to BPMC § 153.050.030(A)(2), which provides as follows:

Wherever a commercially or industrially zoned lot shares a property line with an exclusively residential or a mixed use zoned lot, any exterior new structure, or addition to an existing structure, that exceeds one story in

Honorable Mayor Avila and
Councilmembers Damian, Ayala, Estrada,
and Lozano
April 30, 2025

3084/038710-0001
22163636.2 a04/30/25

height and that faces any rear or side lot line shall be set back twice the required setback.

While the Project does abut a residential property, the parking structure and practice fields do not exceed one story as provided by the BPMC. BPMC § 153.220.200, which defines “story” as follows:

STORY. That portion of a building included between the upper surface of any floor and the upper surface of the floor next above, except that the topmost story shall be that portion of a building included between the upper surface of the topmost floor and the ceiling or roof above. STORY includes a basement.

Because the second level of the structure is an open air structure, it cannot be considered a two story building under the BMPC. The Planning Commission correctly interpreted the code to find that the parking facility does not exceed a single story, and as such the soccer fields do not meet this standard, as the structure itself is a single story. Accordingly, it is reasonable to find that the Project consists of a single story as defined in the code, and an additional setback is not required in this case. (See PC Staff Report, pp. 6-7.)
D. Operations at the Project will not Exceed the City’s Residential Noise Limits Without citation to any evidence, Appellant contends that the Project will produce noise levels above the City’s permitted levels; however, this is not true. The Applicant had an extensive noise study prepared, that was reviewed and approved by the City, for the Project that showed that soccer related noise on the Project would be approximately 49.1 dBA —well under the 55 dBA limit. (See, e.g., PC Staff Report, pp. 4-5; see also Exemption Memorandum, pp. 3.0-13-3.0-14, and Appx. B.) Further, it is important to note that the projections in the noise study likely represent a significant overstatement of the Project ’s potential noise impacts. For example, t he sample facility used in the noise study consisted of ten outdoor fields, instead of four, and the activities observed included amplified music and whistles without any sort of barrier.

Here, t he Project is conditioned to prohibit the use of whistles, buzzers, horns, and amplified music or public address systems (albeit those uses were never contemplated as part of the Project, but instead these conditions were imposed by the City in an abundance of caution). In light of these prohibitions, the only sound that will emanate from the project is the sound of people playing soccer, talking, coaching, and instruction. To further limit any potential sound, the Project includes a 6-foot-high padded wall along the entire perimeter of the soccer fields for the purposes of protecting the players, and to provide further privacy to the surrounding community, but also buffering any sound that may come from the Project.

Honorable Mayor Avila and
Councilmembers Damian, Ayala, Estrada,
and Lozano
April 30, 2025

3084/038710-0001
22163636.2 a04/30/25

Based on these facts, the Planning Commission properly found that the Project complied with the City’s noise limits for residential areas, and the City Council should affirm that decision.

E. The Project Satisfies the City’s Light and Glare Requirements The Appellant ’s concerns over spillover lighting are not supported by the application materials or the Planning Commission’s findings. A photometric study has been provided, and shows that light impacts to surrounding uses will not be significant. (See, e.g., PC Staff Report, pp. 5-6 [showing that the Project ’s lighting and glare impacts will not be significant].) The low fixture height of the lights along with the perimeter padding will ensure that light from the Project does not spill over into adjacent properties. Additionally, the Project includes the installation of mature trees and plants to create an additional buffer between the Project and the Appellant ’s property.

Notwithstanding the fact that the evidence shows that the Project will not have any glare or light spillover impacts , the Project is also required to satisfy the City ’s existing light requirements before any lights are installed to ensure that light impacts will not have deleterious impacts on surrounding properties. Prior to installing the light fixtures, the Applicant is required to submit a schematic Lighting Plan for the Project. (PC Staff Report, p. 5.) This plan will fully comply with the City’s light and glare requirements found in BPMC § 153.140.040. As a result, the Project will fully comply with the City’s light and glare requirements ensuring that light from the Project does not spill into adjacent properties.

F. The Project has Adequate Public Access
Appellant contends that the Project will provide insufficient public access to the facility and cause traffic problems; however, this contention is belied by the Los Angeles County Fire Department (“LACFD”) and the traffic study prepared for the Project. Appellant ’s contention as to the adequacy of the Project ’s parking is discussed in detail above. In addition to including substantially more parking spaces than required by the BPMC, the Project’s onsite circulation plan was reviewed and approved by the LACFD. This specifically addresses the Appellant’s concern related to traffic impacts. As such, the Planning Commission properly found that the Project is adequately accessible and will not result in any significant traffic impacts.

G. The Project is Compatible with the Surrounding Area and the City ’s Design Standards
Contrary to the Appellant ’s concerns, the Project is compatible with the existing development in the area and will substantially improve the character of the site and overall community. Both the City’s General Plan and Zoning Code identify the Project site as an industrial

Honorable Mayor Avila and
Councilmembers Damian, Ayala, Estrada,
and Lozano
April 30, 2025

3084/038710-0001
22163636.2 a04/30/25

property. As such, the Project is surrounded on three sides by industrial uses including a headstone manufacturer, auto body shops, and an aircraft parts manufacturer. On the south side of the Project there is a single family residential development.

Existing Property at 14412 and 14424 Joanbridge (tallest building at 25’)

Proposed Project at 14412 and 14424 Joanbridge (tallest portion at 25’) As a recreational facility, the Project fits within the contemplated categories of land uses for the industrial zone. The architectural design of the building is consistent with the surrounding uses and considering the buildings on the Project site are currently vacant, the Project will serve to improve the integrity and character of the area. Indeed, because this use will cause the removal of an existing derelict building, and the rehabilitation of the other, the Applicant respectfully submits that the new facility will only improve the existing aesthetics of the neighborhood.

Honorable Mayor Avila and
Councilmembers Damian, Ayala, Estrada,
and Lozano
April 30, 2025

3084/038710-0001
22163636.2 a04/30/25

The soccer fields will be surrounded by a decorative wire mesh that will ensure the fields will not be visible from adjacent properties. Additionally, the Project will plant mature trees and plants along the southern portion of the Project site to screen the Project from adjacent residential uses such as Appellant ’s home. In short, the proposed Project is consistent with its surrounding environment, and satisfies the City’s design standards.

H. The Project is Consistent with the City’s General Plan There is no requirement in California law that a project comply with every goal or policy in a jurisdiction ’s general plan. (Naraghi Lakes Neighborhood Preservation Assn. v. City of Modesto (2016) 1 Cal.App.5th 9, 18.) Instead, a finding of general plan consistency only requires that a proposed project be compatible with, and not frustrate, the goals and policies of the general plan. (Ibid.)
Here, the Commission specifically found that the Project furthers two of the City’s General Plan goals. Fi rst, the Project helps maintain a balanced distribution of land uses throughout the City. (General Plan, Land Use Goal 1.0.) Currently, the Project site consists of two vacant buildings and is surrounded on three sides by manufacturing and auto related us es. The Project brings a unique recreational use to the area that is consistent with both the property’s General Plan designation and zoning, and bridges a gap between the traditional industrial uses in the area with the residential uses to the south. As such, the Project helps better balance the distribution of land uses in the area.

Second, the Project creates an opportunity for two levels of commercial development that meet both the needs of local residents and employee populations while also capturing a broader population base by serving the region as a whole. (General Plan, Land Use Policy 1.4.) As a state of the art practice facility, the Project will serve youth soccer players throughout the City and surrounding areas. Based on these facts, the Commission found that the Project presents a good opportunity for local children to learn and play soccer—greatly contributing to the community.

In addition to the aforementioned Goal and Policy, Ms. Jessica Kirchner, AICP, of Impact Sciences, who is a land use consultant with significant experience in analyzing projects for consistency with a city’s General Plan, and other land use regulations, has prepared the enclosed memorandum to show how the Project is consistent with multiple aspects of the City ’s General Plan. A copy of Ms. Kirchner’s CV is attached the memorandum for the Council’s convenience.

Accordingly, as discussed in detail above, the Project satisfies the City’s requirements for development standards, light, noise, and parking and does not conflict with any portion of the City’s General Plan. Therefore, the Planning Commission correctly found that the Project furthers

Honorable Mayor Avila and
Councilmembers Damian, Ayala, Estrada,
and Lozano
April 30, 2025

3084/038710-0001
22163636.2 a04/30/25

the General Plan’s goals and policies and that there is no evidence that the Project is inconsistent with any provision of the General Plan.

I. The Project Will Sufficiently Be Served by Existing Utilities and Services The Appellant vaguely claims that the Project will not be adequately served by existing utilities and services. However, as correctly pointed out in the PC Staff Report, and the findings adopted by the Planning Commission (Finding 2(6)) the Project site is already adequately serviced by the requisite utilities, and services, and there is no reasonable basis to assume that any of these services will be taxed more through the Project rather than the existing authorized industrial uses. 1 J. The Project is Not Detrimental to the Public Interest, Health Safety, Convenience, or Welfare
Contrary to Appellant’s assertions, the Planning Commission made specific findings that the Project would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare.

Notably, the Project was reviewed by the City’s Planning, Building and Safety and Public Works departments in addition to the LACFD. Each of these departments determined that the Project would not substantially increase hazards associated with the Project ’s use. These findings made by the City’s safety departments directly rebuff the arguments asserted in the appeal. Instead, the Project will provide a much needed youth recreational facility that will promote participation in team sports and a healthy lifestyle for the City’s youth. 2 3. The Project is Exempt from CEQA
Appellant makes a generalized statement that the Project does not qualify for the CEQA Class 32 exemption because of traffic, parking, and noise impacts. The CEQA Regulations provide that certain infill projects are categorically exempt from environmental review under CEQA. Here, the Project is categorically exempt as a Class 32 Infill Development because it:
(1) “is consistent with the applicable general plan designation and all applicable general plan policies as well as with applicable zoning designation and regulations ”; (2) “occurs within city limits on a project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses ”; (3) is

1 In one note, Appellant claims that the Project site is “bisected” by large power lines with transformers, and that they are located where the Project will be constructed. This is simply untrue, as the utility lines in question run along the wall separating the Project site from the neighboring property owners.
2 As an aside, the Appellant ’s claim that the Project will result in errant soccer balls leaving the Project site, and either injuring or killing neighbors is speculation, and ignores the fact that the Project site is surrounded by mesh in part to ensure that soccer balls do not leave the facility.

Honorable Mayor Avila and
Councilmembers Damian, Ayala, Estrada,
and Lozano
April 30, 2025

3084/038710-0001
22163636.2 a04/30/25

on a site that “has no value, as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species ”; (4) will not “result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality”; and (5) “can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services.” (14 Cal. Code Regs. § 15332.) Here, the Planning Commission properly found that the Project satisfies the Class 32 requirements and is exempt from CEQA. T he Applicant submitted technical studies that were peer-reviewed by the City, analyzing air quality, noise, transportation, and water quality in connection with the Project. (See also March 26, 2025 Planning Commission Staff Report, Attachment 8, “Class 32 Categorical Exemption Report (including Appendices A through D) ” [providing the relevant regulatory and technical information to find that the Project is exempt under the Class 32 Infill Exemption].) Each of the professionally prepared studies showed that the Project would not result in any significant impacts. After reviewing these studies, the Planning Commission made detailed factual findings supporting its application of the Class 32 exemption.

Appellant has not provided any evidence that contradicts these technical studies or the Planning Commission’s findings. Accordingly, the City should continue to find that the Project is subject to the Class 32 exemption.

4. Conclusion
For the foregoing reasons, the Applicant respectfully requests that the City Council affirm the Planning Commission ’s approval of the Project and deny the appeal. We thank the C ity Council and Ci ty staff f or their consideration of this important proje ct. W e look forward to continue working with the City and bringing this exciting project to the City Baldwin Park.

Sincerely,

RUTAN & TUCKER, LLP

Travis Van Ligten
Enclosure

cc: Nick Baldwin, City Planner, [email protected] Marco Ornelas-Lopez, Asst. City Attorney, [email protected]

811 W. 7th Street, Suite 200
Los Angeles, CA 90017
(213) 935-1901
www.impactsciences.com

MEMORANDUM

To: Honorable Mayor Avila and Councilmembers Damian, Ayala, Estrada, and Lozano

From: Jessica Kirchner, AICP, Managing Principal, Impact Sciences Subject: Project Consistency with Applicable General Plan Land Use Element Policies
Date: April 30, 2025

Impact Sciences has reviewed the City’s General Plan policies as they relate to the proposed Fit 7 soccer facility.

Our determination is the project is consistent with the General Plan. We have provided our analysis and consistency determination in the attached table.

Project Consistency with Applicable General Plan Land Use Element Policies Table

Policy/Goal Project Consistency Analysis
LAND USE ELEMENT1
Land Use Element Policy 1.4: Create opportunities
for two different levels of commercial development:
(1) commercial uses that meet the retail and service
needs of the local resident and employee
populations, and (2) regional- serving retail
commercial businesses that capture revenues from
a broader population base.

Consistent. This policy encourages different types of commercial development in the City, local and regional serving. The Project is a commercial use that meets the local community’s needs by providing a specialized training/recreational facility within the City.

Land Use Element Goal 2.0: Accommodate new
development that is compatible with and
complements existing conforming land uses.

Consistent. The Project is located in an industrial zone that is abutted by residential uses. The Project is consistent with the policy in that it is consistent with existing conforming uses adjacent to the site. In fact, the Project provides a nice buffer between the more noxious industrial uses nearby, and the residences located adjacent thereto.

Policy/Goal Project Consistency Analysis
Land Use Element Policy 2.5: Require that multi -
family, commercial and industrial development
provide adequate buffers (such as decorative walls
and landscaped setbacks) at the designated
boundaries with adjacent uses to prevent impacts
on residences due to noise, traffic, parking, light and glare, and differences in scale; to ensure privacy; and to provide visual compatibility.

Consistent. The Project proposes a six-foot-high concrete masonry wall along the southern perimeter of the Project Site as a buffer between the soccer facility/associated parking and the adjacent residential uses. The concrete masonry wall is designed to shield the adjacent residential uses from direct exposure to vehicle headlights and parking noise. The Project would comply with City standards that require outdoor lighting to face downward and limits spillover. Furthermore, the Project Applicant lighting plan was submitted to the City for review as part of the Project’s Approval. City approval of the lighting plan will ensure that the Project would comply with City’s standards.

The Project has incorporated other design elements including a code-compliant setback from the residential uses, the installation of mature trees and padding along the southern boundary to protect the players, and to provide privacy for the residents..

Land Use Element Policy 2.6: Require that the
external lighting of commercial and industrial
properties be confined to the site to avoid adverse
impacts on adjacent land uses due to light spillover
or glare.

Consistent. The Applicant submitted a lighting plan that outlines the location of each proposed lighting fixture on-site. The lighting plan is subject to City approval. As demonstrated in the lighting plan, all outdoor lighting is oriented to face downwards. The Applicant has also agreed to additional conditions on the Project to ensure all lighting is off by 10 pm. Further, the Project itself includes the installation of mature trees, a code-compliant setback, and the installation of padding, which further
protects the
neighboring property from light spillover.

Land Use Element Policy 7.4: Require adequate on-
site parking and circulation of developments so that
roadways serving these projects can better serve
traffic demands. Site review requirements should
discourage on-street parking.

Consistent. The Project would provide adequate on-site parking as demonstrated in the site plan, and as approved by City staff.

Specifically, as part of the application process, City staff required a showing of the likely “worst-case” scenario of parking by counting the total amount children that would be attending the various training sessions along with the relevant number of coaches, and based off of that plan found that the Project’s parking needs could be adequately met.

Land Use Element Policy 2.7: Require that
automobile and truck access to commercial and
industrial properties adjacent to residential parcels
be located the maximum practical distance from the
residential parcel.

Consistent. The Project would utilize existing driveways. These driveways are located along Joanbridge Street, the farthest location from the residences to the south. Access to the site would not disturb adjacent residential uses.

Land Use Element Policy 3.4 : Provide for the
revitalization of deteriorating land uses and
properties.

Consistent. The project would revitalize two existing underutilized properties by developing a vibrant sports training facility that will provide needed services to the community.

Land Use Element Policy 3.5: Encourage the
rehabilitation of existing commercial facades and
signage.

Consistent. The project would revitalize and redevelop two existing properties and includes an updated façade and signage.

Land Use Element Policy 3.7: As part of
neighborhood beautification efforts, provide street
tress and landscaping in the public right of ways.

Consistent. The project contributes to neighborhood beautification efforts by providing trees and additional landscaping along the perimeter of the Project Site. Likewise, the Project calls for the construction of sidewalk improvements along the front of the Project that currently does not exist.

Urban Design Element2
Urban Design Element, Goal 4.0: Enhance the
aesthetic quality of development in the City.

Consistent. The Project would redevelop two properties with a new modern development that complies with the City’s design guidelines.

Urban Design Element, Policy 4.1: Require that
signage on commercial structures be compatible
and integrated within the structure's architecture.

Consistent. Signage of the facility would be placed along the northern façade of the building, facing Joanbridge Street. The proposed signage would be constructed out of metal material that would complement the facility’s building materials.

Policy/Goal Project Consistency Analysis
Urban Design Element, Goal 5.0: Promote urban
forestry concepts to enhance the environmental
conditions in the city by providing shade, shelter
from inclement weather, improved air quality, and
aesthetic improvements to neighborhoods.

Consistent. The Project would provide new tress, including palm trees on the Project Site. These trees and landscaping would provide shade, shelter, contributed to improved air quality, and would be an aesthetic enhancement for the neighborhood.

Urban Design Element Policy 5.3: Maintain and
conserve existing street trees, and require
replacement where trees are removed.

Consistent. The Project Site does not currently have any street trees. New trees would be planted as part of the project.

Noise Element3
Noise Element Goal, 1.0: Incorporate noise
considerations into land use planning decisions
Consistent. A noise study was prepared for the Project and found the Project is consistent with the City’s noise ordinance and would not exceed noise standards.

Noise Element Policy 1.1 : Use the noise/land use
compatibility standards presented in Table NE- 1 as
a guide for future planning and development
decisions.

Consistent. The Noise Impact Analysis for the Fit 7 Sports Lab Development Project (October 2024) prepared for this Project analyzes the Project’s consistency with the City’s noise standards for interior and exterior noise. The report concludes that the Project would be consistent with the City’s interior and exterior noise standards .

Health & Sustainability Element4
Health & Sustainability Element, Policy 9.01: Support
and expand the planting and maintenance of trees
in the community to provide shade, beautify the
City, build a sense of place, and increase carbon
sequestration.

Consistent. The Project calls for the planting of new mature trees in both the front and back of the Project.

Health & Sustainability Element, Goal HS-13: Provide
residents of all ages with a range of safe and
accessible opportunities for recreation and physical
activities.

Consistent. The Project will provide a new venue in which the City’s children can practice soccer, and thus clearly supports this goal.

Sincerely,

IMPACT SCIENCES, INC.

Jessica Kirchner, AICP

JESSICA KIRCHNER, AICP
CEO & Managing Principal
Jessica is owner and Managing Principal and she frequently serves in multiple roles on projects, including contract and project manager, as well as conducting and writing environmental analyses all while overseeing the firm’s most high- profile clients, revenue, and growth of the firm. With 20 years of experience and a background in journalism, Jessica’s emphasis on clear, concise documents that are not overly complicated has become a company hallmark, along with the ability to deliver projects on unbelievably tight deadlines. She is highly skilled at taking technical documents and concepts and translating them into reader - friendly concepts. She has managed the preparation of more than 100 CEQA documents and serves as an advisor to lead agencies on CEQA implementation.

She has provided input to and taught workshops and seminars on CEQA compliance, CEQA streamlining, and environmental justice analysis.

Representative Project Experience
Managing Principal for the California High Speed Rail Project Senior Review of the Final EIS/EIR (Palmdale to Burbank, CA). T he California High Speed Rail Authority Palmdale to Burbank Project Section is part of Phase 1 of the of the California High-Speed Rail System connecting the Antelope Valley to the San Fernando Valley, which will bring high-speed rail service to the urban Los Angeles area with a new modern rail line that dramatically reduces travel time between the Antelope Valley and the Los Angeles Basin. This approximately 31 to 38-mile project section will connect two key population centers in Los Angeles County with multi-modal transportation hubs in Palmdale and Burbank. Jessica provided senior environmental review of the Final EIR/EIS.

Principal in Charge for the Los Angeles CEQA Guidance Documents, Los Angeles, CA. City of Los Angeles. Jessica is responsible for project oversight, project management, preparation of memos, and QA/QC. Impact Sciences prepared several memos for the City of Los Angeles internal training purposes. The memos were on a variety of topics including health risk assessments, use of addenda and errata, environmental justice and others.

Project Manager for the City of Pasadena Temporary Use of the Rose Bowl by the NFL EIR (Pasadena, CA). The project, for the City of Pasadena, consisted of an amendment to the Arroyo Seco Public Lands Ordinance to increase the number of large events allowed at the Rose Bowl for a period of five years. Key issues included traffic, land use, air quality, noise , and recreation. The highly controversial project required close coordination among team members. Jessica prepared much of the analysis and oversaw tech nical accuracy of subconsultant deliverables. The environmental document was challenged in court and prevailed.

Project Manager for the City of Pasadena Re-Use of the Desiderio Army Reserve Center Project EIR (Pasadena, CA). The project included the reuse of the 5.1 -acre Desiderio US Army Reserve Center located in the City of Pasadena. As proposed the project included two primary components, a 3.87-acre neighborhood park, and nine single-family detached bungalow homes construc ted by Habitat for Humanity. Key issues associated with the

PROJECT ROLE
Principal in Charge

EDUCATION
Master’s Degree in Urban
Planning, University of
Southern California

Bachelor of Arts,
Journalism, Rutgers
University

AFFILIATIONS
Association of
Environmental Planners,
Board Member, Legislative
Committee

A i I tit t f

JESSICA KIRCHNER FLORES, AICP
CEO & Managing Principal

project included historic resources, traffic, and hazards. Jessica prepared much of the environmental analysis and was responsible for developing alternatives.

Principal in Charge for the City of Oxnard CEQA Documentation for Various Fire Stations (Oxnard, CA). Impact Sciences is preparing CEQA documentation for Fire Station Nos. 2, 3 and 4, which are in need of replacement.

Fire Stations 2 and 3 will be demolished and reconstructed on site. Fire Station 4 will be on a vacant site surrounded by existing development. Based on our review of the technical specifications of Fire Stations 2 and 3, we anticipate a Categorical Exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15302, 15303 or 15332 will be sufficient. Due to Fire Station 4’s location, Impact Sciences will prepare an Initial Study with supporting technical studies to determine if either an MND or EIR is necessary. Jessica is responsible for contract administration, client engagement, and leading the overall preparation and quality control of the CEQA documents.

Principal in Charge for the City of Pomona Fairplex Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report ( EIR) (City of Pomona). Impact Sciences is preparing an EIR for the Fairplex Specific Plan, which will direct future land use decisions, economic development, and infrastructure improvements within and around the Fairplex site and the future La Verne stop on the LA Metro Gold Line. The Fairplex Specific Plan is a policy document that will serve as a catalyst for future growth of the Fairplex site and establish the framework for mixed-use, transit-oriented, livable, economically vibrant, and pedestrian -friendly areas within the Fairplex site boundaries. The Plan proposes si te improvements to create connections between the Fairplex site and the surrounding areas and generate business and employment opportunities. Jessica is responsible for contract administration, client engagement, and leading the overall preparation of the EIR.

Principal in Charge for the City of Bell Gardens Environmental Justice Element (Bell Gardens, CA). In compliance with Senate Bill 1000, Impact Sciences is preparing an Environmental Justice Element for the City of Bell Gardens to identify and address public health risks and environmental concerns for vulnerable populations in disadvantaged communities. Additionally, a background report will identify disadvantaged communities based on a variety of indicators, including educational attainment, employment, housing burdened low-income households, income, linguistic isolation, poverty, race and ethnicity, single parent households, U.S. citizenship, violent crime rate, and ability to vote . Goals and policies are being developed u sing data sources such as CalEnviroScreen, MATES, and Census population and employment data . Jessica is responsible for contract administration, client engagement, and leading the overall preparation of the EJ Element.

Principal in Charge for the City of Los Angeles Oil & Gas Drilling Ordinance Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Noise Technical Report and MND (Los Angeles, CA). The Citywide Oil and Gas Drilling Ordinance provides for the termination of oil and gas extraction and production uses within the City over a 20-year period and prohibits new or expanded oil and gas extraction activities. Impact Sciences prepared the CEQA documentation (IS/MND) for the proposed Ordinance, as well as supplemental Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Noise Technical Reports.

Jessica’s role was te am coordination, overseeing the preparation of the environmental documents and overall project and schedule management. The project was completed on an expedited timeframe with just four months from notice to proceed to filing of the Notice of Determination.

Principal in Charge for the City of Los Angeles CEQA Threshold Guide Update (Los Angeles, CA). The project consists of updating the 2006 L.A. CEQA Thresholds Guide (2006 Guide). The 2006 Guide was previously dated in its treatment of issues related to greenhouse gas emissions, energy conservation, air quality, and cultural resources. The project involves reviewing and updating old thresholds, rewording the 2006 guide, and deleting confusing language throughout. The new L.A. CEQA Threshold Guide reflects current state/federal legislations that address environmental impacts. Jessica was responsible for contract management and oversight, document preparation, and quality control review.

JESSICA KIRCHNER FLORES, AICP
CEO & Managing Principal

Principal in Charge for the City of South Pasadena, North-South Corridor Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) Deployment Project CEQA/NEPA Documentation and Air Quality Technical Report, South Pasadena CA. The City of South Pasadena proposes to implement the North-South Corridor ITS Deployment Project, which would update the traffic signals to deploy an advanced adaptive traffic management system along north south Fair Oaks Avenue from the north City limits to Huntington Drive. As a subconsultant to KOA Corporation, Impact Sciences is preparing a Preliminary Environmental Study (PES) Form for submittal to Caltrans District 7; a detailed Project Description to fully define the project and its location; an Air Quality Technical Study; and a Finding of No Adverse Effect (FNAE) document to analyze Project effects related to air quality and cultural resources. Jessica worked with the team to refine the scope of work and provided guidance on the level of environmental review.

Principal in Charge for LA Metro CEQA Review Process Streamlining Recommendations (Los Angeles, CA). Impact Sciences worked with the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) to develop recommendations for streamlining the environmental approval process specific to LA Metro. To understand the context of Metro’s process, Jessica interviewed leaders across the organization to understand major CEQA pain points. Issues included the time and money spent on CEQA implementation as well as lack of clarity around certain types of CEQA documents and their applicability to Metro projects. Based on those interviews the top priorities were ranked and recommendations were developed. The recommendations generally fell into the following categories: internal process changes, legislative fixes, and better use of existing tools, such as exemptions. Jessica presented the recommendations to the Planning and Policy Committee in January 2023.

Principal in Charge for the LA Metro North Hollywood to Pasadena Bus Rapid Transit Technical Reports (Los Angeles, CA). (Sub to Kimley Horn) The North Hollywood to Pasadena Transit Corridor (NoHo to Pasadena BRT) extends approximately 18 miles and is a key regional connection between the San Fernando and San Gabriel Valleys with connections to the Metro Red, Orange and Gold Lines, as well as Metrolink and other municipal bus lines. Impact Sciences prepared the Noise, Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Technical Reports for the project. Key issues included measuring noise along the linear segment, addressing impacts across multiple jurisdictions and consideration multiple alignment and station options. Jessica’s role was team coordination and project management. Due to delays on the traffic modeling, the timeframe for the technical studies was compressed by several weeks. Impact Sciences met the deadline and delivered the reports to Metro on time and on budget.

Jessica was responsible for team coordination and overall management of the budget and schedule.

Principal in Charge for the City of Long Beach CEQA Guide (Long Beach, CA). The purpose of the CEQA Guide was to assist city planners and project applicants in understanding the environmental process. Impact Sciences prepared a guide focused on understanding key impacts and evaluation of streamlining options. Jessica was responsible for project oversight, project management, and QA/QC.

Principal in Charge and Project Manager for the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) 2020 Connect SoCal Regional Transportation Plan / Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS) Program EIR (Los Angeles, CA). The 2020 RTP/SCS outlines the region's goals and policies for meeting current and future mobility needs, provide a foundation for transportation decisions by local, regional and state officials that are ultimately aimed at achieving a coordinated and balanced transportation system. It is important to note that SCAG does not implement individual projects in the RTP, as they will be implemented by local and state jurisdictions, and other agencies. The 2020 RTP also included a comprehensive Health Risk Assessment, prepared by Impact Sciences, that evaluated risk at various freeway segments throughout the SCAG region. The 2020 RTP EIR was due to be adopted at the height of the Covid pandemic, the team quickly adapted to work from home to enable the client to meet the necessary deadlines. Jessica oversaw preparation of the environmental document, reviewed subconsultant deliverables for technical accuracy, and represented the team at project and public meetings.

Vicinity Map

LOCATION: 14412 & 14424 Joanbridge St.

CASE NUMBER: CP 23-05, ZV 23-01 & PR 23-21

DATE: February 14, 2024

AREA
MAP
Not to Scale
N

Subject
Property

Evidence Supporting a Class 32 Categorical Exemption Per CEQA Guidelines Section 15332

Fit 7 Sports Lab Development Project
Assessor Parcel Numbers (APN) 8414-023-010 and 8414-023-011

Prepared for:

City of Baldwin Park
14403 E. Pacific Avenue
Baldwin Park, California 91706
Prepared by:

Impact Sciences, Inc.
811 W. 7th Street, Suite 200
Los Angeles, California 90017

February 2025

Impact Sciences, Inc. i Fit 7 Sports Lab Development Project 1489.001 February 2025

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section Page

1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 1.0-1

1.1 Project Information .................................................................................................................. 1.0-1

1.2 Purpose and Contents of the Categorical Exemption ......................................................... 1.0-1

1.3 Organization of the Report ..................................................................................................... 1.0-3

2.0 Project Description ................................................................................................................................. 2.0-1

2.1 Project Applicant ...................................................................................................................... 2.0-1

2.2 Environmental Setting ............................................................................................................. 2.0-1

2.3 Project Characteristics ............................................................................................................. 2.0-2

2.4 Discretionary Actions and Approvals ................................................................................... 2.0-8

3.0 Categorical Exemption Analysis .......................................................................................................... 3.0-1

3.1 Class 32 Exemption Analysis .................................................................................................. 3.0-1

3.2 Exceptions to a Categorical Exemption ............................................................................... 3.0-25

3.3 References ............................................................................................................................... 3.0-30

LIST OF FIGURES
Figure Page
1 Regional Location Map Regional Vicinity .......................................................................................... 2.0-3 2 Conceptual Site Plan-Floor 1 ................................................................................................................. 2.0-4 3 Conceptual Site Plan-Floor 2 ................................................................................................................. 2.0-5

LIST OF TABLES
Table Page

3.0-1 Project Consistency with Applicable General Plan Land Use Element Goals & Policies ............ 3.0-3

3.0-2 Project Consistency with Other Applicable General Plan Goals & Policies .................................. 3.0-4

3.0-3 Construction-Related Criteria Pollutant and Precursor Emissions – Maximum Pounds per Day ........................................................................................................................................................... 3.0-9

3.0-4 Long-Term Operational Emissions – Maximum Pounds per Day ................................................ 3.0-10

3.0-5 Localized Significance of Construction Emissions – Maximum Pounds per Day ....................... 3.0-11

3.0-6 Localized Significance of On-Site Operational Emissions – Maximum Pounds per Day .......... 3.0-11

3.0-7 Estimated Exterior Construction Noise at Sensitive Receptors ..................................................... 3.0-14

3.0-8 Vibration Levels at Off-Site Sensitive Uses from Project Construction ........................................ 3.0-17 Appendices
A Air Quality Impact Analysis
B Noise Impact Analysis
C Screening Memorandum
D Water Quality Technical Report

Impact Sciences, Inc. 1.0-1 Fit 7 Sports Lab Development Project 1489.001 February 2025

1.0 INTRODUCTION
The subject of this Categorical Exemption is the proposed Fit 7 Sports Lab Development Project (“Project”), located at 14412 Joanbridge Street and 14424 Joanbridge Street (collectively, the “Project Site”) in the City of Baldwin Park (“City”). The Project would merge the two adjacent lots as one property. The Project would repurpose the existing building located at 14412 Joanbridge Street into a two-story soccer training facility.

The Project would also demolish the building at 14424 Joanbridge Street and construct associated ground floor parking with rooftop soccer fields . The Project is discussed in further detail in Section 2.0, Project Description, of this report.

1.1 PROJECT INFORMATION
Project Title: Fit 7 Sports Lab Development Project
Project Location: 14412 Joanbridge Street and 14424 Joanbridge Street, Baldwin Park, CA 91706 Project Applicant: Trinidad Campbell
Trinidad Campbell Design & Building
3829 Ronda Vista Place
Los Angeles, CA 90027
Lead Agency: City of Baldwin Park Planning Division
14403 Pacific Avenue
Baldwin Park, CA 91706

1.2 PURPOSE AND CONTENTS OF THE CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION
State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 states that a Class 32 Categorical Exemption consists of projects characterized as in-fill development meeting the conditions described below:
a) The project is consistent with the applicable general plan designation and all applicable general plan policies as well as with applicable zoning designation and regulations. b) The proposed development occurs within city limits on a project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses.
c) The project site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare, or threatened species. d) Approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality.

1.0 Introduction
Impact Sciences, Inc. 1.0-2 Fit 7 Sports Lab Development Project 1489.001 February 2025
e) The site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. This Class may be used where above-noted conditions (a) through (e) are fulfilled, where it can be seen with certainty that the proposed project could not have a significant effect on the environment.

The Class 32 Categorical Exemption is intended to promote infill development within urbanized areas which are consistent with local general plan and zoning requirements. This class is not intended to be applied to projects which would result in any significant traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality effects.

Application of this exemption, as all categorical exemptions, is limited by the factors described in State CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2.

For a proposed project to qualify for the Class 32 Categorical Exemption, the project must be able to demonstrate that it does not fall under the following Exceptions in State CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2:
a) Location. Classes 3, 4, 5, 6, and 11 are qualified by consideration of where the project is to be located – a project that is ordinarily insignificant in its impact on the environment may in a particularly sensitive environment be significant. Therefore, these classes are considered to apply all instances, except where the project may impact on an environmental resource of hazardous or critical concern where designated, precisely mapped, and officially adopted pursuant to law by federal, state, or local agencies.
b) Cumulative Impact. All exemptions for these classes are inapplicable when the cumulative impact of successive projects of the same type in the same place, over time is significant. c) Significant Effect. A categorical exemption shall not be used for an activity where there is a reasonable possibility that the activity will have a significant effect on the environment due to unusual circumstances.
d) Scenic Highways. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project which may result in damage to scenic resources, including but not limited to, trees, historic buildings, rock outcroppings, or similar resources, within a highway officially designate d as a state scenic highway. This does not apply to improvements which are required as mitigation by an adopted negative declaration or certified EIR.
e) Hazardous Waste Sites. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project located on a site which is included on any list compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code. f) Historical Resources. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project which may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource.

1.0 Introduction
Impact Sciences, Inc. 1.0-3 Fit 7 Sports Lab Development Project 1489.001 February 2025

1.3 ORGANIZATION OF THE REPORT
This Categorical Exemption is organized as follows:

1.0 Introduction: This section provides introductory information such as the Project title, the Project Applicant, and the designated Lead Agency for the Project.

2.0 Project Description: This section provides a detailed description of the Project including the environmental setting, Project characteristics, and environmental clearance requirements.

3.0 Categorical Exemption Analysis: This section contains an assessment and discussion of impacts for each environmental issue identified above.

Impact Sciences, Inc. 2.0-1 Fit 7 Sports Lab Development Project 1489.001 February 2025

2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION

2.1 PROJECT APPLICANT
The Project Applicant proposes to construct a new soccer training facility on the two merged lots, totaling 26,244 square feet (“Project”). The Project Applicant is Trinidad Campbell Design & Building, and the Lead Agency is the City of Baldwin Park (City).

2.2 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
Project Location
The proposed Fit 7 Sports Lab Development Project (Project) would involve improvements to two adjacent lots located at 14412 Joanbridge Street (Assessment Parcel Number [APN] 8414- 023-011) and 14424 Joanbridge Street (APN 8414-023-010) in the City of Baldwin Park (City). The Project would merge the two adjacent lots as one property (Project Site). The Project Site is located within the northern perimeter of Baldwin Park’s jurisdiction limits, located approximately 1.30 miles east of I nterstate 605 (I-605) and 1.96 miles south of Interst ate 210 (I -210) (see Figure 1 , Regional Location). The Project Site is primarily accessible by East Joanbridge Street, located north of the Project Site.

Existing Site Zoning and Land Use Designations
The Project Site is developed and located within a heavily urbanized area of the City. According to the City of Baldwin Park General Plan (dated 2020), the Project Site is currently designated for General Industrial land uses. Concurrently, the Project Site is zoned Industrial by the City of Baldwin Park Zoning Map.

Background
The existing Baldwin Park community lacks recreational spaces within close proximities to residential areas. Although the Santa Fe Dam Recreation Area is accessible for hiking and biking activities, the City currently lacks small-scale recreational facilities that are more accessible for local neighborhoods. Further, residential neighborhoods within the immediate vicinity of the Project Site are surrounded by a mixture of industrial and commercial uses. The Project would provide recreational space available to the surrounding industrial and commercial uses, and well as the residences and the area overall.

2.0 Project Description
Impact Sciences, Inc. 2.0-2 Fit 7 Sports Lab Development Project 1489.001 February 2025
14412 Joanbridge Street
The building located at 14412 Joanbridge Street was previously occupied by SLW Apparel, a clothing manufacturing company. 1 The existing building is approximately 6,782 square feet in size, and approximately 22 feet in height. Vehicular access to 14412 Joanbridge Street is provided via one gated driveway along Joanbridge Street, which serves as the site’s ingress/egress. 2 A vehicle driving aisle is provided along the eastern perimeter that leads vehicles to the existing surface parking on-site.

Three surface parking spaces and one American Disabilities Act (ADA) compliant surface parking space are provided within the western portion of the property. Additionally, an existing trash enclosure and three existing trees are located along the southern perimeter of the property. 14424 Joanbridge Street
The existing building located at 14424 Joanbridge Street is currently vacant. The building is approximately 5,000 square feet and approximately 16 feet in height. Vehicular access to the property is provided via one gated driveway along Joanbridge Street .3 Surface parking is provided along the eastern perimeter of the site and ADA-compliant parking spaces are provided along the southern perimeter.

2.3 PROJECT CHARACTERISTICS
Project Features and Operations
The Project would merge the properties located at 14412 and 14424 Joanbridge Street into one property totaling approximately 26,244 square feet. The Project would repurpose the 14412 Joanbridge Street building into a two -story soccer training facility. The Project would also demolish the 14424 Joanbridge Street building and construct gro und floor parking with rooftop soccer fields . The Project will serve as a place for individuals in the area to train and practice soccer skills. The facility is not intended to be used for soccer games or recreational leagues. Hours of operation would occur during non-school and after normal work hours, between the hours of 4:00 P.M. and 10:00 P.M. on weekdays, 9:00 A.M. and 6:00 P.M. on Saturdays, and 8:00 A.M. to 2:00 P.M. on Sundays. The following details the specific improvements.

1 Google Earth, 2024.
2 Google Earth, 2024.
3 Google Earth, 2024.
¯
0 100 20050 Miles
Esri, NASA, NGA, USGS, County of Los Angeles, California State Parks, Esri, HERE, Garmin, SafeGraph, METI/NASA, USGS, Bureau of Land Management, EPA, NPS, USDA City of Baldwin Park
Project Site
Regional Location Map
FIGURE 1
1489.001•01/23
SOURCE: Esri, 2023

PL PL
PLPL
PL
PL
PL
PL
PL
175'-0"
PL
93'-2"
53'-5"

MEN WOMEN

MEETING
ROOM
GYM
ROOM
4'-0"12'-4"
15'-0"
4'-0"18'-0"
28'-7"
5'-0"
9'-4" 10'-6" 7'-11"93'-2"
124'-3"
40'-6"5'-0"
42'-9"
4'-0"
4'-0"
4'-0"
4'-0"
7'-2"

EXISTING BUILDING
55'-9"
8'-1"

EXISTING

ROLL UP
DOOR
PL PL

FIRE TRUCK PATH
26' BY 99'-4"
END OF

FIRE TRUCK
26'-0"
01 02
03 04
05 13
14 15
16 38
21 22
27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35
32'-6"
3'-0"
24'-0"
24'-0"
26'-0"
3'-3"
24'-0"
ADA
9'-0"5'-0"
18'-0"26
14412 JOANBRIDGE St.

INPATH OF TRAVEL

PATH OF TRAVEL OUT
8'-6"
18'-0"
8'-2"
12'-11"
10'-6"
11'-8"
9'-4"
5'-0"
18'-0"
24'-0"
18'-0"
14424 JOANBRIDGE St.
75'-0"
FIRE
HOSE
PATH
75'-0"75'-0"
150' MAX. TO

FIRE TRUCK
75'+75'=150'
150' MAX. TO

FIRE TRUCK
75'+75'=150'
SOCCER COURT 1
8'-6"
75'-0"75'-0"
11 3
3 2
2 12'-0"15'-2"
75'-0"75'-0"
150'-0"
39 8'-6"
18'-0"
06 07
08 19 20
09 10
11 12
36 37
ADA
9'-0"
18'-0"
7 Parking Spaces
32 Parking Spaces25

ELEVATOR
3'-0"
8'-6"
5'-0"
3'-0"

DECK EDGE ABOVE
M.RRW.RR
HALL
12'-6"
4'-0"7'-1"12'-6"
11'-6"
17 18
6'-0"
16'-0"
5'-0"
23 24
5'-0"
44 Lot Size: 13,122 sq.ft.
14412 + 14424 JOANBRIDGE St.

Parking = 39 Spaces
Lot Size: 13,122 sq.ft.
25'-3"
26'-6"
5'-0"5'-0" to PL

1. VENDING MACHINE

EPEX BEVERAGE
COMBO 32d x 35w x 77 h
1 TRASH ENCLOSURE
Trinidad Campbell
Design & Building
3829 Ronda Vista Pl. Los Angeles, CA. 90027
(323)497-9969
[email protected]
Project Number
Date
Drawn By
Scale
FIT 7 LAB
14412 & 14424 JOANBRIDGE St.

BALDWIN PARK
LOS ANGELES, CA 91706
Architect
Alejandro Resendiz
52 Carrige Way. Pomona, CA. 91766
(909)456-4506
[email protected]
MAY 25/2023
A-1.1
GLRS
2210 BAL

FIRST FLOOR
PLAN
1/8" = 1'-0" 1/8" = 1'-0"1 GROUND FLOOR PLAN
N
12/19/2022
Conceptual Site Plan - Floor 1
FIGURE 2
1489.001•10/23
SOURCE: Trinidad Campbell, 2022

175'-0"
175'-0"
75'-0"
75'-0"
PL
PLPL
75'-0"
PL PL
PL
7'-6"
8'-4"7'-7"
7'-6"
6'-0"
3'-6" 7'-11"30'-93
4"
13'-4"
13'-2"
10'-83
4"
11'-6"
10'-83
4" 22'-103
4"
10'-33
4"
10'-33
4"
OFFICE 3 OFFICE 4
OFFICE 1 OFFICE 2

RR KITCHEN
PL PL
3'-0"
4'-0"
3'-0"
3'-0"
53'-7"
31'-73
4"
4'-0" 4'-0"
8'-0"
6'-0"48'-7" 48'-7" 6'-0" 48'-7"
55'-10"4'-0"
26'-8"
5'-0"
SOCCER FIELD 2
SOCCER FIELD 3 SOCCER FIELD 4 SOCCER FIELD 5
NET
NET
NET
31'-7"
26'-0"
53'-5"
94'-1"
55'-10" 4'-0"
4'-0"
150'-0"
75'-0"
14412 JOANBRIDGE St.

LOT SIZE = 13,222 sq.ft
14424 JOANBRIDGE St.

LOT SIZE = 13,222 sq.ft
UPPER FLOOR +12'-6" @ +12'6"
4 SOCCER FIELDS
WITH NET ABOVE @ +25'
11 3
3 2
2 4'-0"
3'-0"
28'-7"
54'-10"
55'-10"4'-0"
4'-0"
55'-73
4"
46'-101
2"15'-0"47'-11"
14'-8"
1 2 Diagonal =
Steps to be no more than
93'-4" separate

ELEVATOR
8'-6"
3'-0" 10'-0" 52'-0"
5'-0"
108'-7"
218'-2" 44
TOTAL 1st floor plan = 6,625 sq ft
TOTAL MEZZANINE = 1,650 sq ft
2,314 sq ft
1,586 sq ft
3,410 sq ft 3,438 sq ft 3,770 sq ft
6,625 sq ft

TOTAL CONCRETE UPPER
SLAB ON 14412; 14424=
14,518 sq.ft.
5'-0"

MEETING
ROOM
5'-0" to PL
5'-0" to PL
Trinidad Campbell
Design & Building
3829 Ronda Vista Pl. Los Angeles, CA. 90027
(323)497-9969
[email protected]
Project Number
Date
Drawn By
Scale
FIT 7 LAB
14412 & 14424 JOANBRIDGE St.

BALDWIN PARK
LOS ANGELES, CA 91706
Architect
Alejandro Resendiz
52 Carrige Way. Pomona, CA. 91766
(909)456-4506
[email protected]
MAY 25/2023
A-1.2
GLRS
2210 BAL

SECOND FLOOR
PLAN
1/8" = 1'-0"
N
1/8" = 1'-0"1 SECOND FLOOR PLAN
N
12/19/2022
Conceptual Site Plan - Floor 2
FIGURE 3
1489.001•10/23
SOURCE: Trinidad Campbell, 2022

2.0 Project Description
Impact Sciences, Inc. 2.0-6 Fit 7 Sports Lab Development Project 1489.001 February 2025
Ground Floor
14412 Joanbridge Street
The Project would repurpose the existing building into a two -story soccer training facility. The first floor of the facility would include a meeting room, a gymnasium room, ADA-compliant restrooms, and a 6,625 square foot indoor soccer field equipped with two nets and one bench, and one water fountain (see Figure 2, Conceptual Site Plan -Floor 1 ). The property’s existing driveway would serve as the main exit for vehicles from the Project Site. A 2,446 square foot driving lane would be provided for vehicles as an egress route and utilized as an emergency fire truck lane for the Los Angeles County Fire Department (LACFD).

Additionally, seven ground-level parking spaces would be provided within this property. 14424 Joanbridge Street
The Project would demolish the existing 5,000 -square-foot building at 14424 Joanbridge Street and construct ground floor parking with rooftop soccer fields. As shown in Figure 2, the Project would provide up to 32 ground -level parking spaces including two ADA -compliant parking spaces. Parking would be covered with a cement slab supported by columns and beams. The Project would utilize the property’s existing driveway as the main vehicular entrance to the Project Site, and a one-way driving lane would be included to guide vehicular circulation. Additionally, an outdoor trash enclosure would be provided within this property.

Second Floor
14412 Joanbridge Street
At this property, the second -floor level would include the mezzanine consisting of four office spaces, a kitchen, and a restroom (see Figure 3, Conceptual Site Plan-Floor 2). On the southern side of the second - floor level, the Project would also include a 2,314 square foot outdoor soccer field, equipped with two soccer nets, one bench, and a fountain. The soccer field would be directly above the parking area on the first floor.

Nets would be installed to divide soccer field locations and shield visitors from any soccer balls that leave the soccer field. The Project design includes a 12- to 17-foot-high padded wall for the entire perimeter of the second level. The padding would be a minimum of three inches thick and would be insulated with Rockwool AFB.4 Access to the second floor of the proposed facility would be provided via stairs, and access to the proposed outdoor soccer field would be provided via an elevator and stairs.

4 Rockwool AFB, “Products,” Available online at: https://www.rockwool.com/north-ame rica/products-and- applications/products/afb/, accessed February 4, 2025.

2.0 Project Description
Impact Sciences, Inc. 2.0-7 Fit 7 Sports Lab Development Project 1489.001 February 2025
14424 Joanbridge Street
At this property, the second -floor level includes three outdoor non-regulation soccer fields (that total approximately 10,618 square feet) above the proposed ground -level parking. As shown in Figure 3, each soccer field would be equipped with two soccer nets and benches. Nets would be installed between each soccer field to shield facility users from any soccer balls that leave the soccer field. Further, a net would be installed above all three outdoor soccer fields to prevent soccer balls from leaving the facility. The Project design includes a 12- to 17-foot-high padded wall for the entire perimeter of the second level. The padding would be a minimum of three inches thick and would be insulated with Rockwool AFB. 5 Access to the
second level would be provided via staircases and the proposed elevator located on the 14412 Joanbridge Street property.

Landscaping
The Project would preserve the existing palm trees ( Arecacea palmae) and shrubs located along the Project Site frontage. The Project will remove the existing on-site trees located along the southern perimeter of the Project Site. New trees would be planted along the same border of the Project Site, and new shrubs would be planted along the proposed surface parking area. The Project would also plant additional palm trees and shrubs along the Joansbridge Street frontage.

Architectural and Building Material Elements
The building proposes a maximum height of 25 feet. Architectural features for both the proposed soccer training facility and its associated parking would include perforated metal panels, metal mesh, and wire mesh to prevent any soccer balls from escaping the site. A protective (i.e., padded) wall and wire mesh would be installed on the second-floor level of the 14244 Joanbridge Street property to protect facility users and soccer players (see above) . Building materials for the first floor of the facility ma y include royal plywood benchmark ash wood. Light emitting diode (LED) lighting will be used for all interior and exterior lighting. Additionally, signage of the facility name would be installed on the facility, facing Joanbridge Street.

Conditional Use Permit
Per Section 153.210, Part 9 (Conditional Use Permit) of the City of Baldwin Park ’s Municipal Code, the Project Applicant would apply for a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for the Project . Under Section 153.050.020 (Use Regulations) of the City’s Municipal Code, office spaces (for business) are an acceptable

5 Rockwool AFB, Products. Available online at: https://www.rockwool.com/north-ame rica/products-and- applications/products/afb/, accessed February 4, 2025.

2.0 Project Description
Impact Sciences, Inc. 2.0-8 Fit 7 Sports Lab Development Project 1489.001 February 2025
use for an Industrial zone, such as the Project Site . According to Section 153.050.020, indoor and outdoor recreational facilities would be acceptable uses on the Project Site, upon the issuance of a CUP.

As discussed in Section 3. 0, Categorical Exemption Analysis , the Project would be compatible with existing and future surrounding land uses and would be consistent with the City’s General Plan . The Project would also have adequate provisions of utility services. As stated, adequate vehicle access to the Project Site would be provided.

Project Construction
Construction activities associated with the Project would occur over an approximate 11 -month duration.

Building demolition is anticipated to take approximately two weeks and site grading is anticipated to take approximately one month. Upon completion of site grading activities, proposed building construction, foundation preparation, installation/connections for utilities, and finishing would take approximately 10 months.

2.4 DISCRETIONARY ACTIONS AND APPROVALS
Discretionary entitlements, reviews, and approvals required for implementation of the Project would include, but would not necessarily be limited to, the following:

Local Agencies
• Site Plan Review; City of Baldwin Park Planning Division and LACFD • Grading Permit; City of Baldwin Park Building and Safety Division • Conditional Use Permit; City of Baldwin Park Planning Division • Lot Merger; City of Baldwin Park Planning Division
Impact Sciences, Inc. 3.0-1 Fit 7 Sports Lab Development Project 1489.001 February 2025

3.0 CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION ANALYSIS

3.1 CLASS 32 EXEMPTION ANALYSIS
Exemption Class
The Project qualifies for a Class 32 – In-Fill Development Project Categorical Exemption under CEQA as set forth in Section 15332 of the State CEQA Guidelines.

Exemption Rationale
Article 19, Categorical Exemptions, from the State CEQA Guidelines (Sections 15300 – 15333) lists classes of projects which have been determined not to have a significant effect on the environment and which are exempt from the provisions of CEQA as required by Section 21084 of the Public Resources Code. This section provides an analysis demonst rating that the Project meets the criteria for a Class 32 Categorical Exemption. The language of each criterion of the Class 32 Categorical Exemption is shown in italics below under its respective heading, which is followed by the Project analysis for each criterion.

Section 15332 of the State CEQA Guidelines states that Class 32 consists of projects characterized as in -fill development meeting the criteria described in this section. a) The project is consistent with the applicable general plan designation and all applicable general plan policies as well as with applicable zoning designation and regulations. b) The proposed development occurs within city limits on a project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses.
c) The project site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species. d) Approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality.
e) The site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services.

3.0 Categorical Exemption Analysis
Impact Sciences, Inc. 3.0-2 Fit 7 Sports Lab Development Project 1489.001 February 2025
Project Analysis
Criterion (a): Consistency with general plan designation, general plan policies, zoning designation and regulations
The proposed Project is subject to the City of Baldwin Park (City) General Plan, and the City of Baldwin Park Municipal Code. An overview of the City’s applicable plans and regulations is provided below.

City of Baldwin Park General Plan
Land uses o f the Project Site are guided by the City’s General Plan. The General Plan establishes goals, policies, and directions the City will take to achieve the vision of the community and guide the future development of the City while integrating a range of State-mandated elements including Land Use, Urban Design, Economic Development, Circulation, Noise, Air Quality, Public Safety, Health and Sustainability, Housing, Open Space and Conservation. Baldwin Park’s General Plan Land Use Element is grounded by guiding principles that cumulatively represent the community’s vision for the future.

The Project Site is currently designated for General Industrial land uses, which allows a variety of industrial and commercial uses further defined in the City’s Zoning Ordinance. Examples of l and uses permitted under the General Industrial Use include assembly, manufacturing, and material production businesses that can operate without adversely impacting surrounding land use. Additionally, a limited range of commercial businesses are permitted to support the businesses and workforce . Because the project wi ll provide recreational uses that can be utilized by the surrounding uses, the Project is consistent with the uses authorized in the General Plan. Further, u nder Section 153.050.020 (Use Regulations) of the City’s Municipal Code, office spaces (for business) are an acceptable use for an Industrial Commercial zone.

According to Section 153.050.020, indoor and outdoor recreational facilities would be an acceptab le use, upon the issuance of a CUP. Prior to this issuance, the Project site plan of design would be reviewed and considered by the City as part of the Project Application submitted by the Applicant . In accordance with the City to Baldwin Park Design Guidelines Manual (April 2012), the Project’s site plan, as well as its associated landscape plan and architectural plan would be submitted to the City’s Planning Division for approval and review. Furthermore, the Project would be required to comply with development standards outlined in Section 153.130 (Site Planning And General Development Standards) of the City’s Municipal Code for all structures within the City. The maximum permitted floor-to-area ratio (FAR) under the General Industrial land use designation is 0.75. The Project would include a total of 6,813 square feet of building area on a 26,244-square foot site and thus, would have a 0.25 FAR.

3.0 Categorical Exemption Analysis
Impact Sciences, Inc. 3.0-3 Fit 7 Sports Lab Development Project 1489.001 February 2025
The Project’s consistency with applicable objectives and policies in the General Plan Land Use Element is presented in Table 3.0-1, Project Consistency with Applicable General Plan Land Use Element Policies.

As shown in Table 3.0-1, the Project will be consistent with the following applicable policies.

Table 3.0-1
Project Consistency with Applicable General Plan Land Use Element Goals & Policies

Strategy/Policy Project Consistency
Goal 2.0: Accommodate new development that is compatible with and complements existing conforming land uses Goal 2.0: Accommodate new development that is compatible with and complements existing conforming land uses
Consistent. The Project develop a commercial and
recreational use in proximity to residential
development and would serve as a buffer between
existing heavier industrial uses and those residential
uses.

Policy 2.5: Require that multi-family, commercial and industrial development provide adequate buffers (such as decorative walls and landscaped setbacks) at the designated boundaries with adjacent uses to prevent impacts on residences due to noise, traffic, parking, light and glare, and differences in scale; to ensure privacy; and to provide visual compatibility.

Consistent. The Project would include a six-foot-high
concrete masonry wall along the southern perimeter
of the Project Site as a buffer between the soccer
facility/associated parking and the adjacent
residential uses.

Policy 2.6: Require that the external lighting of commercial and industrial properties be confined to the site to avoid adverse impacts on adjacent land uses due to light spillover or glare.

Consistent. The Project would comply with the
City’s Design Guidelines. The Applicant submitted a
lighting plan demonstrating location of fixtures and
proposed lighting fixture on-site. The Project would
comply with City standards and orient outdoor
lighting to face downwards.

Policy 2.7: Require that automobile and truck access to commercial and industrial properties adjacent to residential parcels be located the maximum practical distance from the residential parcel.

Consistent. The Project would utilize the two
existing driveways on-site. These driveways are
located along Joanbridge Street, the farthest location
from the residences to the south.

Policy 3.4: Provide for the revitalization of deteriorating land uses and properties.

Consistent. The project would revitalize two existing
properties by developing a new well-designed
recreational facility.

Policy 3.4: Encourage the rehabilitation of existing commercial facades and signage.

Consistent. The project would revitalize and
redevelop two existing properties, and includes an
updated façade and signage.

Policy 3.7: As part of neighborhood beautification efforts, provide street tress and landscaping in the public right of ways.

Consistent. The project contributes to neighborhood
beautification efforts by providing trees and
additional landscaping along the perimeter of the
Project Site.

Policy 7.4: Require adequate on-site parking and circulation of developments so that roadways serving these projects can better serve traffic demands. Site review requirements should discourage on-street parking.

Consistent. The Project would not introduce new on-
street parking spaces in the area. Further the Project
provides sufficient parking as required by Code.

Goal 18.0: Minimize the impact of new development on regional water quality.

Consistent. As discussed in Criterion (d), the Project
would comply with National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) requirements and
implement a Standard Urban Storm Water Mitigation
Plan (SUSMP). The SUSMP would outline the best
management practices (BMPs) that the Project would

3.0 Categorical Exemption Analysis
Impact Sciences, Inc. 3.0-4 Fit 7 Sports Lab Development Project 1489.001 February 2025

In addition to the foregoing Land Use Element Goals and Policies, the Project is also consistent with the other goals and policies found in the City’s General Plan, as reflected in Table 3.0-2.

Table 3.0-2
Project Consistency with Other Applicable General Plan Goals & Policies

Strategy/Policy Project Consistency
implement as a method of reducing stormwater
runoff and pollutants on-site.

Policy 18.1: Evaluate development projects for compliance with NPDES requirements, aiming toward reducing pollutant loads in stormwater runoff, minimizing impervious surface areas, and minimizing peak flows.

Consistent. As discussed in Criterion (d), the Project
would comply with National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) requirements and
implement a Standard Urban Storm Water Mitigation
Plan (SUSMP). The SUSMP would outline the best
management practices (BMPs) that the Project would
implement as a method of reducing stormwater
runoff and pollutants on-site.
__
Source: City of Baldwin Park General Plan, Land Use Element. Dated 2002.Impact Sciences, 2024 Strategy/Policy Project Consistency
Urban Design Element, Goal 4.0: Enhance the aesthetic quality of development in the City.

Consistent. The Project would redevelop two
properties with a new modern development that
complies with the City’s design guidelines.

Urban Design Element, Policy 4.1: Require that signage on commercial structures be compatible and integrated within the structure's architecture.

Consistent. Signage of the fa cility would be placed
along the northern façade of the building, facing
Joanbridge Street . The proposed signage would be
constructed out of metal material that would
complement the facility’s building materials.

Urban Design Element, Goal 5.0: Promote urban forestry concepts to enhance the environmental conditions in the city by providing shade, shelter from inclement weather, improved air quality, and aesthetic improvements to neighborhoods.

Consistent. The Project would provide new tress,
including palm trees on the Project Site. These trees
and landscaping would provide shade, shelter,
contributed to improved air quality, and would be an
aesthetic enhancement for the neighborhood.

Policy 5.3: Maintain and conserve existing street trees, and require replacement where trees are removed.

Consistent. The Project would replace the existing
trees along the southern perimeter of the Site.

Noise Element, Goal, 1.0: Incorporate noise considerations into land use planning decisions
Consistent. The project is consistent with the City’s
noise ordinance and would not exceed noise
standards.

Policy 1.1: Use the noise/land use compatibility standards presented in Table NE-1 as a guide for future planning and development decisions.

Consistent. The Noise Impact Analysis prepared for
this Project analyzes the Project’s consistency with
the City’s noise standards for interior and exterior
noise (See Appendix B). The report concludes that
the Project would be consistent with the City’s

3.0 Categorical Exemption Analysis
Impact Sciences, Inc. 3.0-5 Fit 7 Sports Lab Development Project 1489.001 February 2025

Because the Project proposes an authorized commercial use, and is otherwise consistent with the Goals and Policies of the General Plan, the Project is consistent with the General Plan.

City of Baldwin Park Municipal Code
The Project site is located within the Industrial zoning designation as identified in the City’s Zoning Ordinance.1 Under Section 153.050.020 (Use Regulations) of the City’s Municipal Code, office spaces (for business) are an acceptable use for an Industrial zone. According to Section 153.050.020, indoor and outdoor recreational facilities would be an acceptable use within the Industrial zone , upon the issuance of a Conditional Use Permit ( CUP). As such, the Project Applicant would obtain a CUP in accordance with Section 153.210, Part 9 (Conditional Use Permit) of the City of Baldwin Park Municipal Code. Prior to this issuance, the Project site plan would be reviewed and considered by the City as part of the Project Application submitted by the proponent. Accordingly, the proposed use for the Project is authorized under the City’s zoning regulations, provided the City makes the requisite findings to support the issuance of a CUP.

In accordance with the City of Baldwin Park Design Guidelines Manual (April 2012), the Project’s site plan, as well as its associated landscape plan and architectural plan would be submitted to the City’s Planning Division for approval and review. Furthermore, the Project would be required to comply with the applicable development standards outlined in Section 153.130 ( Site Planning and General Development Standards) of the City’s Municipal Code for all structures within the City.

1 City of Baldwin Park, “Appendix Zoning Map.” Available online at:
https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/baldwinpark/latest/baldwinpark_ca/0-0-0-12598, accessed Janu ary 30, 2025.

Strategy/Policy Project Consistency
interior and exterior noise standards (See Appendix
B).

Noise Element Goal 2.0: Minimize noise spillover from commercial and industrial uses into nearby residential neighborhoods.

Consistent. As explained by the Noise Impact
Analysis, the Project would not result in significant
noise impacts to the surrounding properties.

Policy 2.1: Minimize noise spillover from commercial and industrial uses into nearby residential neighborhoods.

Consistent. As explained by the Noise Impact
Analysis, the Project would not result in significant
noise impacts to the surrounding properties.
__
Source: City of Baldwin Park General Plan, Land Use Element. Dated 2002.Impact Sciences, 2024

3.0 Categorical Exemption Analysis
Impact Sciences, Inc. 3.0-6 Fit 7 Sports Lab Development Project 1489.001 February 2025
Compliance with applicable City regulations, approval from the City’s Planning Division, and the issuance of the CUP would ensure that the Project would be consistent with the City’s Municipal Code and impacts would be less than significant .

In sum, as discussed above, the Project is consistent with the applicable General Plan designation and all applicable General Plan policies as well as with applicable zoning designation and regulations , with the issuance of the conditional use permit . Thus, the Project meets Criterion (a) in Section 15332 of the State CEQA Guidelines.

Criterion (b): The proposed development occurs within city limits on a project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses The Project Site is located entirely within the City limits on a site that is approximately 0.60 acres in size.

As described in Section 2.0, Project Description, the Project Site is located in an urban setting consisting of commercial, industrial, and residential uses. The Project Site is bound by industrial uses to the west and east (i.e., James Auto Repair and B & C Auto Body, respectively). Single-family residential uses are located immediately south of the Project Site and are designated and zoned as Si ngle Family Residential by the General Plan and the City Zoning Code, respectively. Immediately north of the Project Site is East Joanbridge Street, and industrial uses are approximately 60 feet north of the Project Site (i.e., Spartan Fleet Service). These properties are designated and zoned as Industrial by the General Plan and the City Zoning Code, respectively. Therefore, as the Project Site is located within City limits, is less than five acres, and is substantially surrounded by urban uses, the Project meets Criterion (b) in Section 15332 of the State CEQA Guidelines.

Criterion (c): No value as habitat for endangered, rare, or threatened species The existing Project Site is fully developed with two buildings, associated surface parking, and minimal ornamental landscaping along the southeastern and northeastern perimeters. The Project Site is located in a developed, urban area, and is surrounded by commercial, industrial, and residential uses. Because of these conditions, the Project Site does not provide any suitable habitat for special -status mammal, plant, and fish species. Thus, construction activities would not adversely impact candidate, sensitive, or special status species. Furthermore, P roject operation would not adversely affect any candidate, sensitive, or special status species. Based on the site’s urban condition, no endangered, rare, threatened, or special status plant species (or associated habitats) or wildlife species designated by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW), or California Native Plant Society have the potential to occur on-site.

3.0 Categorical Exemption Analysis
Impact Sciences, Inc. 3.0-7 Fit 7 Sports Lab Development Project 1489.001 February 2025
The proposed Project would remove multiple on-site trees along the southern perimeter of the Project Site.

However, the Project Applicant would plant replacement trees along the same border. If required, pursuant to Section 153.165 of the City’s Municipal Code, the Project Applicant would apply for a private property tree removal permit with the City. This application would list the species name and size of the trees to be removed and replaced for the City’s Tree Officer to review and approval. Based upon the foregoing, the Project Site provides no value as habitat for endangered, rare, or threatened species. Therefore, the Project satisfies this criterion.

Criterion (d): No significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality The following provides a summary of the technical reports prepared to analyze air quality, noise, traffic, and water quality impacts. See Appendices A through D.

Air Quality
The following is a summary of the Project’s Air Quality Impact Analysis included as Appendix A to this document.

Air Quality Management Plan (2022 AQMP) Consistency
The 2022 AQMP for the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) was developed in effort with the California Air Resources Board (CARB), the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA ) to establish a program of rules and regulations to reduce air pollutant emissions to achieve California Ambient Air Quality Standards (CAAQS) and National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). The plan’s pollutant control strategies are based on SCAG’s 2020- 2045 Regional Transportation Plan / Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS). Criteria for determining consistency with the AQMP are defined in Chapter 12, Section 12.2 and Section 12.3 of the SCAQMD’s 1993 CEQA Air Quality Handbook, and include the following:
• Consistency Criterion No. 1 : The proposed Project will not result in an increase in the frequency or severity of an existing air quality violation, or cause or contribute to new violations, or delay the timely attainment of air quality standards or the interim emissions reductions specified in the AQMP. • Consistency Criterion No. 2 : The proposed Project will not exceed the assumptions in the AQMP or increments based on the years of the Project build-out phase.

With respect to the first criterion, area air quality planning, including the AQMP, assumes that there will be emissions from new growth, but that such emissions may not impede the attainment and may actually contribute to the attainment of applicable air quality standards within the Basin. As discussed herein, the

3.0 Categorical Exemption Analysis
Impact Sciences, Inc. 3.0-8 Fit 7 Sports Lab Development Project 1489.001 February 2025
Project would not result in construction air quality emissions that exceed the SCAQMD thresholds of significance. Construction-related emissions would be temporary in nature, lasting only for the duration of the construction period, and would not have a long -term impact on the region’s ability to meet state and federal air quality standards. Furthermore, the Project will be required to comply with applicable SCAQMD rules and regulations for new or modified sources. By meeting SCAQMD rules and regulations, Project construction activities will be consistent with the goals and objectives of the AQMP to improve air quality in the Basin. Also discussed Appendix A, the Project would not result in operational air quality emissions that exceed the SCAQMD thresholds of significance. Thus, the Project would be consistent with the first criterion.

With respect to the second criterion, the AQMP was prepared to achieve national and state air pollution standards within the region. A project that is considered to be consistent with the AQMP would not interfere with attainment of AQMP goals because the g rowth from the Project is included in the regional projections used to formulate the AQMP. Therefore, projects, land uses, and activities that are consistent with the applicable assumptions used in the development of the AQMP would not jeopardize attainmen t of the air quality levels identified in the AQMP, even if they exceed the SCAQMD’s project -level daily emissions thresholds.

The Project does not include the addition or removal of housing and thus would have no direct impact on population and housing forecasts for the area. Although the Project could increase employment in the area, such increases would be consistent with the planned growth assumptions utilized in preparing the AQMP.

It is anticipated that employees of the Project would primarily consist of existing residents in the Baldwin Park area and would not result in a high number of employees relocating to the region. As such, the Project would not have the potential to conflict with regional growth projections identified in Southern California Association of Government’s (SCAG’s) 2020-2045 Regional Transportation Plan / Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS) and the AQMP. Thus, the Project is also consistent with the second criterion.

As the Project is consistent with Criterion Nos. 1 and 2, the Project would not conflict with or obstruct implementation of any applicable air quality plan, and this impact is less than significant.

Regional Air Quality Emissions
The analysis of regional daily construction emissions has been prepared utilizing the CalEEMod computer model recommended by the SCAQMD. Predicted maximum daily construction -generated emissions for the Project are summarized in Table 3.0-3 , Construction-Related Criteria Pollutant and Precursor Emissions – Maximum Pounds per Day. These calculations assume that appropriate dust control measures would be implemented as part of the Project during each phase of development, as specified by SCAQMD

3.0 Categorical Exemption Analysis
Impact Sciences, Inc. 3.0-9 Fit 7 Sports Lab Development Project 1489.001 February 2025
Rule 403 (Fugitive Dust). Rule 403 control requirements include but are not limited to: applying water in sufficient quantities to prevent the generation of visible dust plumes; applying soil binders to uncovered areas; reestablishing ground cover as quickly as possible; utilizing a wheel washing system to remove bulk material from tires and vehicle undercarriages before vehicles exit the Project Site; and maintaining effective cover over exposed areas. As shown in Table 3.0-3 the peak daily emissions generated during the construction of the Project would not exceed any of the regional emission thresholds recommended by the SCAQMD. Therefore, Project construction would not result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria air pollutant for which the Project region is nonattainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard.

Table 3.0-3
Construction-Related Criteria Pollutant and Precursor Emissions – Maximum Pounds per Day

Construction Year ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5
2023 (Year 1) 1.32 12.60 12.00 0.02 2.77 1.58
2024 (Year 2) 0.60 5.80 7.75 0.01 0.41 0.27
Regional Threshold 75 100 550 150 150 55
Exceed? No No No No No No

Source: Impact Sciences. See Appendix A for CalEEMod data.

Note: Project emissions account for the reductions from SCAQMD Rule 403 (Fugitive Dust).

Project-generated operational emissions will be associated with motor vehicle use, energy use, and area sources, such as the use of natural -gas-fired appliances, landscape maintenance equipment, consumer cleaning products, and architectural coatings associated with the operation of the Project. The operational emissions from the Project were calculated with CalEEMod and the operational emissions were compared against SCAQMD regional thresholds to determine Project significance. Long -term operational emissions attributable to the Project are summarized in Table 3.0-4, Long-Term Operational Emissions – Maximum Pounds per Day. As shown, the operational emissions generated by the Project will not exceed the regional thresholds of significance set by the SCAQMD.

3.0 Categorical Exemption Analysis
Impact Sciences, Inc. 3.0-10 Fit 7 Sports Lab Development Project 1489.001 February 2025

Table 3.0-4
Long-Term Operational Emissions – Maximum Pounds per Day

Source ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5
Area Source 0.34 0.01 1.03 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01
Energy Use < 0.005 0.05 0.04 <0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01
Mobile Source 0.40 0.37 3.74 0.01 0.30 0.06
Total 0.74 0.43 4.81 0.01 0.30 0.06
Regional Threshold 55 55 550 150 150 55
Exceed? No No No No No No

Source: Impact Sciences. See Appendix A for CalEEMod data.

As shown in Table 3.0-3 and Table 3.043, the Project’s construction and operational emissions would not exceed the SCAQMD’s thresholds for any criteria air pollutants. Thus, the Project would also not result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria air pollutant for which the P roject region is in nonattainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard. These impacts are less than significant.

Localized Air Quality Emissions
The Project Site is located within SRA 9 – East San Gabriel Valley with receptors located within 25 meters. 2 The closest receptor distance in the SCAQMD’s mass rate look -up tables is 25 meters. Projects that are located closer than 25 meters to the nearest receptor are directed to use the LSTs for receptors located within 25 meters. As the Project Site is less than one acre, LSTs for a one-acre site in SRA 9 with sensitive receptors located within 25 meters were utilized to address the potential localized NOx, CO, PM10, and PM2.5 impacts. As shown in Table 3.0-5, Localized Significance of Construction Emissions – Maximum Pounds per Day, the Project would not exceed any of the identified localized thresholds of significance during construction. Therefore, the Project’s construction would not expose sensitive receptors to substantial air pollutant concentrations and these impacts would be less than significant.

2 LSTs based on shorter averaging periods, such as the NO2 and CO LSTs, are applied to receptors such as industrial or commercial facilities since it is reasonable to assume that workers at these sites could be present for periods of one to eight hours. Therefore, this analysis evaluates localized air quality impacts from construction activities associated with the Project on sensitive receptors for NO 2, CO, PM10, and PM2.5, and on “non-sensitive” receptors (e.g., industrial or commercial facilities) for NO2 and CO.

3.0 Categorical Exemption Analysis
Impact Sciences, Inc. 3.0-11 Fit 7 Sports Lab Development Project 1489.001 February 2025

Table 3.0-5
Localized Significance of Construction Emissions – Maximum Pounds per Day

Construction Phase NOx CO PM10 PM2.5
Demolition 4.99 5.91 0.52 0.25
SCAQMD Localized Thresholds 89 623 5 3.00
Grading 12.60 11.40 2.67 1.55
SCAQMD Localized Thresholds 89 623 5 3
Building Construction 5.93 7.00 0.28 0.26
SCAQMD Localized Thresholds 89 623 5 3
Exceed? No No No No

Source: Impact Sciences. See Appendix A for CalEEMod data.

Notes: Calculations assume compliance with SCAQMD Rule 403 – Fugitive Dust. The localized thresholds for each phase are based on a 1-acre site with a receptor distance of 25 meters (82 feet) in SCAQMD’s SRA 9.

The LST methodology would typically not apply to the operational phase of a commercial use Project because emissions for these Projects are primarily generated by mobile sources traveling on local roadways over generally large distances or areas. LSTs would apply to the operational phase of a Project if the Project includes stationary sources or attracts mobile sources that may spend long periods queuing and idling at the site.

As the Project would not include warehouse or transfer facilities, an operational analysis against the LST methodology is not directly applicable to the Project. Nevertheless, Table 3.0-6, Localized Significance of On-Site Operational Emissions – Maximum Pounds per Day, has been included to illustrate the potential on-site emissions during Project operation. As shown in Table 3.0-6, the Project would not exceed any of the identified localized thresholds of significance. Therefore, the Project’s operation wo uld not expose sensitive receptors to substantial air pollutant concentrations and these impacts would be less than significant.

Table 3.0-6
Localized Significance of On-Site Operational Emissions – Maximum Pounds per Day

Emissions Source NOx CO PM10 PM2.5
Area Sources 0.01 1.03 < 0.01 < 0.01
Energy Demand 0.05 0.04 < 0.01 < 0.01
Total On-Site Emissions 0.06 1.07 0 0
SCAQMD Localized Thresholds 89 623 2.00 1
Exceed? No No No No

Source: Impact Science. See Appendix A for CalEEMod data.

3.0 Categorical Exemption Analysis
Impact Sciences, Inc. 3.0-12 Fit 7 Sports Lab Development Project 1489.001 February 2025
The Project would not result in potentially significant CO “hot spots” and a Project- specific CO hotspots analysis is not required to reach this conclusion. It has long been recognized that CO exceedances (“hot spots”) are caused by vehicular emissions, primarily when idling at intersections. Vehicle emissions standards have become increasingly more stringent in the last twenty years. With the turnover of older vehicles, introduction of cleaner fuels and implementation of control technology on industrial facilities, CO concentrations for the Project vicinity have historically met st ate and federal attainment status for the air quality standards. CO concentrations in SRA 9 are substantially below the California one -hour or eight - hour CO standards of 20 or 9.0 parts per million (ppm), respectively. Accordingly, with the steadily decreasing CO emissions from vehicles, even very busy intersections do not result in exceedances of the CO standard. Therefore, the Project would not have the potential to cause or contribute to an exceedance of the California one-hour or eight-hour CO standards of 20 or 9.0 ppm, respectively. Impacts with respect to localized CO concentrations would be less than significant.

Construction would result in the generation of diesel particulate matter ( DPM) emissions from the use of off-road diesel equipment required for demolition, grading, excavation, building construction, and other construction activities. The use of diesel -powered construction equipment would be temporary and episodic. The duration of exposure would be short and exhaust from construction equipment dissipates rapidly. Current methodology for conducting health risk assessments is associated with long term exposure periods (9, 30, and 70 years). Therefore, short-term construction activities would not be expected to generate a significant health risk. Furthermore, the Project Site is approximately 0.60 acres. Generally, construction for projects contained in a site of such size represent less than significant health risks due to limitations of the off -road diesel equipment able to operate and thus a reduced amount of generated DPM, reduced amount of dust -generating ground -disturbance possible compared to larger const ruction sites, and reduced duration of construction activities compared to the development of larger sites. Furthermore, construction would be subject to and would comply with California regulations limiting the idling of heavy-duty construction equipment to no more than five (5) minutes, which would further reduce nearby sensitive receptors’ exposure to temporary and variable DPM emissions. 3 For these reasons, DPM
generated by construction activities would not be expected to expose sensitive receptors to substantial amounts of air toxics and these impacts would be less than significant.

Odors
The SCAQMD CEQA Air Quality Handbook (1993) identifies certain land uses as sources of odors. These land uses include agriculture (farming and livestock), wastewater treatment plants, food processing plants,

3 California Air Resources Board, “In-Use Off-Road Diesel-Fueled Fleet Regulation,” Available online at:
https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/our-work/programs/use-road-diesel-fueled-fleets-regulation/about, accessed February 4, 2025.

3.0 Categorical Exemption Analysis
Impact Sciences, Inc. 3.0-13 Fit 7 Sports Lab Development Project 1489.001 February 2025
chemical plants, composting facilities, refineries, landfills, dairies, and fiberglass molding. The Project would not include any of the land uses that have been identified by the SCAQMD as odor sources.

Construction activities associated with the Project may generate detectable odors from heavy- duty equipment exhaust and architectural coatings. However, construction- related odors would be short -term in nature and cease upon Project completion. In addition, the Project would be required to comply with the California Code of Regulations, Title 13, sections 2449(d)(3) and 2485, which minimizes the idling time of construction equipment either by shutting it off when not in use or by reducing the time of idling to no more than five minutes. This would reduce the detectable odors from heavy-duty equipment exhaust. The Project would also be required to comply with the SCAQMD Rule 1113 – Architectural Coating, which would minimize odor impacts from ROG emissions during architectural coating. Any odor impacts to existing adjacent land uses would be short-term and not substantial. As such, the Project would not result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of peopl e.

Impacts would be less than significant.

Noise
The following is a summary of the Project’s Noise Impact Analysis included as Appendix B.

Construction Noise
Construction of the Project would require the use of heavy equipment for demolition, grading/site preparation, installation of utilities, building fabrication, and finishing. Construction activities would also involve the use of smaller power tools, generators, and other sources of noise. During each stage of construction, several types of equipment potentially could be operating concurrently, and noise levels would vary based on the amount of equipment in operation and the location of the activity. The Fed eral Highway Administration’s (FHWA) Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM) has compiled data regarding the noise- generating characteristics of specific types of construction equipment and typical construction activities.

The construction noise levels forecasted for each phase of construction are presented in Table 3. 0-7, Estimated Exterior Construction Noise at Sensitive Receptors. Noise levels would diminish notably with distance from the construction site at a rate of 6 decibel ( dB(A)) per doubling of distance (noise from stationary or point sources is reduced by about 6 dB(A) for every doubling of distance at acoustically hard locations). For example, a noise level of 86 dBA Noise Equivalent Level (L eq) measured at 50 feet from the
noise source to the receptor would decline to 80 dBA Leq at 100 feet from the source to the receptor and fall by another 6 dBA Leq to 74 dBA Leq at 200 feet from the source to the receptor. These noise attenuation rates assume a flat and unobstructed distance between the noise generator and the receptor. Intervening

3.0 Categorical Exemption Analysis
Impact Sciences, Inc. 3.0-14 Fit 7 Sports Lab Development Project 1489.001 February 2025
structures and vegetation would further attenuate (reduce) the noise. Furthermore, it should be noted that increases in noise levels at sensitive receptors during construction would be intermittent and temporary and would not generate continuously high noise levels.

Table 3.0-7
Estimated Exterior Construction Noise at Sensitive Receptors

Sensitive Land Uses
Distance to
Project Site
(feet)
Estimated Peak
Construction Noise
Levels (dBA 1-Hour Leq)
Exceed FTA 90 dBA
1-Hour Leq
Criteria?

1. Residential uses to the South Adjacent 86.8 No

a See Figure 4 (Noise Monitoring and Sensitive Receptor Location Map). b See Appendix B for details associated with equipment and distance assumptions for each phase of construction. This table summarizes the highest noise level during any of the construction phases.

Source: Impact Sciences, Inc., January 2023. See Appendix B.

The City does not have specific limitation on construction noise levels. Instead, construction noise is regulated by limiting construction activity to the less noise sensitive daytime hours. Specifically, as stated previously, Section 130.37 of the BPMC states no person within a residential zone, or within a radius of 500 feet therefrom, to operate equipment or perform any outside construction or repair work on buildings, structures, or projects or to operate any piledriver, power shovel, pneumatic hammer, derrick, power hoist, or any other construction type device (between the hours of 7:00 p.m. of one day and 7:00 a.m. of the next day) in such a manner that a reasonable person of normal sensitiveness residing in the area is caused discomfort or annoyance unless beforehand a permit therefor has been duly obtained from the Department of Public Works. As the Project would comply with the daytime construction hours established in the BPMC, this analysis also uses the FTA’s general construction noise criteria of 90 dBA Leq (1 -hour) 4 to
provide additional context for the Project’s potential to generate daytime construction noise impacts.

While construction activity would increase noise levels in the vicinity of the Project Site, the Project’s construction activities would not exceed the FTA’s general construction noise criteria of 90 dBA Leq (1 - hour) at any sensitive receptors. Furthermore, Project construction would not occur during restricted periods, and thus, the Project would be consistent with the criteria set forth in the City’s Municipal Code.

As such, construction noise impacts would be less than significant.

4 Federal Transit Administration, Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual, Table 7-2 (General Assessment Construction Noise Criteria), September 2018.

3.0 Categorical Exemption Analysis
Impact Sciences, Inc. 3.0-15 Fit 7 Sports Lab Development Project 1489.001 February 2025
Operational Noise
Parking Noise
Various noise events would occur periodically from the Project’s parking uses. Such periodic events would include activation of car alarms, sounding of car horns, closing of car doors, engine revs, and tire squeals.

As noted in Appendix B, the existing urban environment of the Project Site currently generates noise levels associated with parking and vehicular sources. Although the Project would increase the number of vehicles parking in the area by adding up to 39 parking spaces on site, the types of noise would be similar to those currently occurring in the vicinity of the Project Site. As detailed in Appendix B , parking-related noise levels at the properties nearest to the Project Site (i.e., residences to the south) would be approximately 46.8 dBA Leq, which is below the allowable exterior daytime (7:00 A.M. – 7:00 P.M.) and evening (7:00 P.M. – 10:00 P.M.) noise standards for residential zones. The Project would not be operational during nighttime hours (10:00 P.M. – 7:00 A.M.) and would have no potential to conflict with nighttime standards. As such, the Project would be consistent with the City’s exterior noise standards and impacts would be less than significant.

Stationary Noise Sources
As part of the Project, new mechanical equipment, HVAC units, and exhaust fans could be installed on the roof or near the proposed new structures. Although the operation of this equipment would generate noise, the design of these on-site HVAC units and exhaust fans would be required to comply with the regulations of the BPMC. Specifically, Section 153.140.070 of the BPMC states:

E. Enclosed Equipment. Utilization of compressors or other equipment, including, but not limited, to vents, ducts and conduits, but excluding window or wall -mounted air-conditioners, which are located outside of the exterior walls of any building, shall be enclosed w ithin a permanent, noncombustible, view-obscuring enclosure to ensure that the equipment will not emit noise in excess of the ANSI standards.

In addition to these requirements, the Project will screen mechanical equipment as feasible and necessary to meet City noise standards. As such, compliance with Section 153.140.070 of the City’s Municipal Code would ensure noise from stationary sources would be less than significant.

Exterior Soccer Noise
The Project includes outdoor soccer training fields on the rooftop of the proposed parking (second level).

The soccer fields would introduce new sources of noise from people playing soccer, people talking , coaching and other related activities. In order to assess the Project’s noise compatibility with the Project

3.0 Categorical Exemption Analysis
Impact Sciences, Inc. 3.0-16 Fit 7 Sports Lab Development Project 1489.001 February 2025
area, noise measurements at a similar soccer center operation were conducted. Measurements were taken during the daytime hours of 7:00 A.M. to 7:00 P.M. and the evening hours of 7:00 P.M. to 10:00 P.M. These hours were selected to reflect the Project’s proposed operational hours of 4:00 P.M. to 10:00 P.M. Monday through Friday, 9:00 A.M. to 6:00 P.M. Saturdays and 8:00 A.M to 2:00 P.M. Sundays. The measured noise level during these activities was recorded at 59.1 dBA Leq. After assessing this recorded noise level, as well as considering the proposed design for the Project (i.e., the safety wall as detailed in the Project Description and Appendix B), the analysis concluded that the soccer-related noise levels at the properties to the south of the Project Site would be approximately 49.1 dBA Leq, which is below the allowable exterior daytime and evening noise standards for residential zones under the City’s Municipal Code (see Appendix B). The Project would not be operational during nighttime hours and would have no potential to conflict with nighttime standards. As such, the Project would be consistent with the City’s exterior noise standards and impacts would be less than significant.

Vibration
The FTA provides ground- born vibration impact criteria with respect to building damage during construction activities. PPV, expressed in inches per second, is used to measure building vibration damage.

Construction vibration damage criteria are assessed based on structural category (e.g., reinforced-concrete, steel, or timber). FTA guidelines consider 0.2 inch/sec PPV to be the significant impact level for non - engineered timber and masonry buildings. Structures or buildings constructed of reinforced concrete, steel, or timber have a vibration damage criterion of 0.5 inch/sec PPV pursuant to FTA guidelines. 5 Using the parameters described previously for the construction noise analysis, construction vibration levels at off-site uses were calculated and are shown below in Table 3.0-8, Vibration Levels at Off-Site Sensitive Uses from Project Construction.

5 Federal Transit Administration, Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual, September 2018.

3.0 Categorical Exemption Analysis
Impact Sciences, Inc. 3.0-17 Fit 7 Sports Lab Development Project 1489.001 February 2025

Table 3.0-8
Vibration Levels at Off-Site Sensitive Uses from Project Construction

Sensitive Uses Off-Sitea Distance to Project
Site (ft.)
Receptor
Significance
Threshold PPV
(in./sec)
Estimated PPV
(in/sec)

1. Adjacent residences to the south Adjacent 0.5 0.191

a See Figure 4 (Noise Monitoring and Sensitive Receptor Location Map) in Appendix B. b While the Project includes construction activity up to the property lines of adjacent receptors, this analysis assumes that not all equipment would operate closer than 15 feet from the residential uses during peak activities.

Source: Impact Sciences, Inc., January 2023. See Appendix B

The vibration velocities predicted to occur at the nearest sensitive receptors adjacent to the Project Site would be 0.191 in/sec PPV. These nearby structures are constructed of reinforced concrete, steel, or timber which have a vibration damage criterion of 0.5 inch/sec PPV pursuant to FTA guidelines. As shown in Table 3.0-8, Project construction vibration levels would not have the potential to exceed this standard and this impact would be less than significant.

Traffic
The Fit 7 Lab Football Intensive Training – Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Screening Memorandum (screening memorandum) (see Appendix C, Screening Memorandum) was completed for the Project by Kittleson & Associates, a professional traffic engineering firm. The memorandum analyzed the Project’s trip generation and uses to determine whether the proposed project would require a detailed CEQA VMT impact analysis, per the City of Baldwin Park’s adopted VMT standards (June 2020). 6 According to the City’s VMT standards, a project may be exempt from a detailed VMT analysis if meets at least one of the following four screening criteria:

1. Project Type Screening. Retail projects up to 50,000 square feet and projects that generate fewer than 110 vehicle trips per day are classified as ‘small projects’ and are presumed to have a less than significant VMT impact.

6 City of Baldwin Park, Staff Report, June 16, 2020. Available online at:
https://baldwinpark.granicus.com/MetaViewer.php?view_id=10&clip_id=2627&meta_id=245414, accessed February 4, 2025.

3.0 Categorical Exemption Analysis
Impact Sciences, Inc. 3.0-18 Fit 7 Sports Lab Development Project 1489.001 February 2025

2. Low VMT Screening . Residential and office projects that are proposed in areas that generate VMT below adopted City thresholds (defined as 15% below baseline VMT metrics) are presumed to have a less than significant VMT impact and thus can be screened out.

3. Transit Priority Area (TPA) Screening . Projects located in TPAs (within a half -mile radius of a major transit stop that is existing or planned) do not require a detailed VMT analysis. The proposed project is located more than a half-mile from the nearest Metrolink station and the area is not a planned TPA per the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) Regional Transportation Plan / Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/STS).

4. Affordable Housing Screening. Affordable housing developments or affordable housing units within mixed-use developments are presumed to have a less than significant impact and should be screened out of needing a detailed VMT analysis.

As described in the Appendix C, Screening Memorandum, determined that the project would result in 85 net new trips which is below the screening criteria of 110 trips. 7 As such, the Project meets the Project Type
Screening criterion and can be screened out of further VMT analysis. Therefore, the Project is deemed to have a less than significant impact.

The Project Site does not contain any emergency facilities and is not located adjacent to an emergency evacuation route. During construction, the contractor would be required to maintain adequate emergency access for emergency vehicles as required by the City. Project operations would not interfere with adopted emergency response or evacuation plans. Therefore, no significant impacts are identified or anticipated related to emergency evacuation routes.

Water Quality
The following is a summary is the Project’s Water Quality Technical Report (see Appendix D).

As described in Appendix D, the Project will comply with current City and County water quality permit conditions, regulations, and best management practices (BMPs). The Project’s construction -related activities during site preparation and grading has the potential to displace soils, and temporarily increase the potential for soils to be subject to wind and water erosion. These construction- related erosion effects would be addressed through compliance with the Los Angeles County MS4 Permitting System , in which the Project would implement Best Management Practices (BMPs) BMPs to minimize the potential pollution

7 According to the screening memorandum, the Project is expected to generate approximately 141 daily trips; a trip generation credit of 56 daily trips would apply since the previous land uses were active when the Project application was initiated.

3.0 Categorical Exemption Analysis
Impact Sciences, Inc. 3.0-19 Fit 7 Sports Lab Development Project 1489.001 February 2025
to the City’s stormwater drainage system. The Project would also be required to comply with all applicable regulations and requirements outlined in Chapter 52 of the City’s Municipal Code. Furthermore, the Project Applicant would be required to prepare and submit an Erosion and Sediment Control Plan (ESCP) to the City’s Engineering Department. Upon approval of the ESCP, the Project’s adherence with the regional and local requirements during the construction phase would result in less than significant short -term construction impacts to water quality.

Long-term operation of the proposed soccer facility would similarly have the potential to impact drainage systems due to pollutants in stormwater runoff (sediment runoff) that could have the potential to affect tributary drainage features. The Project would continue to use the existing storm drainage system on- site to off-set stormwater and pollution. As such, the Project would be required to comply with the Los Angeles County MS4 Permit requirements and NPDES Permit No. CAS004001, Order No. R4-2021-0105 and prepare a project-specific low impact development ( LID) Plan. The LID Plan would identify structural and non- structural BMPs to minimize potential water quality issues related to new development, hydromodification, and identification of receiving waters. Potential BMPs include, but would not be limited to, implementing filtration systems and storm drain inserts and maintenance programs to remove trash, debris, and waste. Additionally, to demonstrate compliance with the Basin Plan, the Project would be required to prepare and implement a SUSMP that would outline all Project-related BMPs that meet the Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board’s (LARWQCB’s) standards. Following compliance with LARWQCB’s and City requirements, Project operations would not violate any water quality standards or otherwise substantially degrade surface or groundwater quality. Therefore, the Project would not result in any significant effects relating to water quality.

Summary of Criterion (d)
As demonstrated above, the Project will not generate significant effects relating to air quality, noise, traffic, or water quality. Thus, the Project meets Criterion (d) in Section 15332 of the State CEQA Guidelines.

Criterion (e): Adequately served by all required utilities and public services Water Supply and Infrastructure
The Project Site is located within an established urban environment with existing utilities. The Project will access and connect to these existing utilities.

Water treatment would be provided by the Valley County Water District (VCWD), an independent, special district that provides water services to a portion of the Cities of Baldwin Park, Irwindale, West Covina, and

3.0 Categorical Exemption Analysis
Impact Sciences, Inc. 3.0-20 Fit 7 Sports Lab Development Project 1489.001 February 2025
Azusa.8,9 The Project does propose the use of three new water fountains, a kitchen, and bathrooms, which typically drive the demand for potable water usage. However, the water demand from these uses would not be substantial and would likely not be greater than the existing uses or the City’s General Plan land use buildout scenario for the site.

According to the District’s Urban Water Management Plan, the reliability of VCWD’s supply is expected to be adequate to meet normal year, single dry year and multiple dry year demand conditions between 2025 and 2040. The VCWD would have average surplus of 482 potable water in acre -feet per year (AFY) under a Normal Year Supply, an average surplus of 324 AFY under a Single Dry Year Supply, and averages of 311, 768, 1,876, 1,020, and 2,165 AFY surplus under a Multiple Dry Year scenario.

The Project’s estimated water consumption is presented in the Project’s air quality data (see Appendix A).

As discussed in Appendix A, the Project is estimated to consume approximately 1,249,353 gallons per year, or approximately 3.84 AFY. The Project would represent approximately one percent of the average surplus under a Single Dry Year Supply scenario and less than one percent of the average AFY under a Normal Year Supply and a Multiple Dry Year scenario. Therefore, implementation of the Project is not expected to measurably reduce the VCWD ’s supply projections, and as such, no new or expanded water treatment facilities would be required.

The Project does propose the use potable water. However, the water demand from these uses would not be substantial and would likely not be greater than the existing uses or the City’s General Plan land use buildout scenario for the site . Thus, the Project would not result in additional demand on water supplies as future development of Commercial/Industrial uses have been previously accounted for and analyzed in the City of Baldwin Park General Plan Environmental Impact Report and VCWD’s 2020 Urban Water Management Plan. Therefore, with respect to water treatment facilities, impacts would be less than significant.

Wastewater Treatment Facilities
Wastewater produced by the Project would be treated at the San Jose Creek Water Reclamation Plant (SJCWRP) located adjacent to the City of Industry. The SJCWRP currently has a design capacity of treating 100 million gallons of wastewater per day (mgd) and currently processes an average of 58.5 mgd. 10 As

8 Valley County Water District, “Service Area Map.” Available online at:
https://www.vcwd.org/DocumentCenter/View/126/Valley-County-Water-District-Service-Area-Map-PDF.

Accessed September 4, 2024.
9 V alley County Water District, “About Us.” Available online at: https://www.vcwd.org/27/About-Us. Accessed September 4, 2024.
10 L os Angeles County Sanitation Districts, “San Jose Creek Water Reclamation Plant.” Available online at https://www.lacsd.org/services/wastewater-sewage/facilities/san-jose-creek-water-reclamation-plant, accessed September 4, 2024.

3.0 Categorical Exemption Analysis
Impact Sciences, Inc. 3.0-21 Fit 7 Sports Lab Development Project 1489.001 February 2025
stated in Appendix A , the Project is anticipated to generate approximately 2,242 gallons per day. 11 This would represent less than one percent of both the design capacity and the average amount of wastewater that is treated by the SJWCP per day. Therefore, the SJCWRP would have the capacity to treat the wastewater generated by the Project. With respect to wastewater treatment facilities, impacts would be less than significant.

Solid Waste Generation
The Project can be adequately served by an existing landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the Project’s solid waste disposal needs. Approximately 70 percent of solid waste generated within the City is disposed at the El Sobrante Landfill.12 The El Sobrante Landfill permits a maximum daily throughput of 16,054 tons of solid waste per day and currently has a remaining capacity of 143,977,170 tons of solid waste. The Project involves the redevelopment of an existing vacant industrial structure into a new soccer training facility. Construction activities associated with the Project would generate solid waste that would be temporary and would cease upon completion of the construction of the Project. According to the Project’s Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas modeling, Project operational activities are expected to generate approximately 0.05 tons per year of solid waste (see Appendix A). The solid waste generated from Project operations would represent less than one percent of the maximum daily throughput of both landfills. As such, the Project would not generate solid waste in excess of State or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure. Less than significant impacts would occur.

Natural Gas & Electricity Demand
The City of Baldwin Park, and the project site, is located in the service area of Southern California Edison (SCE) and Southern California Gas Company (SoCalGas). The project site includes existing buildings and is currently served with electrical and natural gas infrastructure. Both utility providers would be expected to continue to provide electricity and natural gas services to the project site. 13,14 The Project would utilize
the existing electricity, natural gas, and telecommunication lines and services. While the Project does propose the use of bathrooms , office space, a meeting room, a gym room, kitchens and lighting for the

11 Los Angeles County Sanitation District, “Table 1, Loadings for Each Class of Land Use.” Available online at:
https://www.lacsd.org/home/showpublisheddocument/8639/637921797286370000, acc essed September 4, 2024. 12 CalRecycle, “Jurisdiction Disposal and Alternative Daily Cover (ADC) Tons by Facility.” Available online at:
https://www2.calrecycle.ca.gov/LGCentral/DisposalReporting/Destination/DisposalByFacility, accessed September 4, 2024.
13 S outhern California Edison. Our Service Territory. Available online at: https://www.sce.com/about-us /who-we- are/leadership/our-service-territory, accessed January 14, 2025. 14 Southern California Gas Company. SoCal Regions. Available online at:
https://www.socalgas.com/sites/default/files/SoCalGas_Regional_Map.pdf, accessed January 14, 2025.

3.0 Categorical Exemption Analysis
Impact Sciences, Inc. 3.0-22 Fit 7 Sports Lab Development Project 1489.001 February 2025
fields and parking areas, electricity and energy demand from these uses would not be substantial and would likely not be greater than existing uses. Due to the proposed indoor and outdoor recreational uses, the Project is not expected to substantially increase the demand for telecommunication services.

The California Energy Commission ( CEC) coordinates with the staff of both the SCE and SoCal Gas to determine annual consumption and demand in their respective planning areas. 15 Total electricity consumption in the SCE service area in the year 2022 was approximately 5,321 gigawatt-hour s (gWh) for
the commercial sector. 16 According to the CEC, electricity consumption (and supply) in the SCE service area is projected to reach between 120,000 gigawatt-hou rs (gWh) in the low-dem
and scenario and 132,000
gWh in the high-dem
and scenario in electricity by the year 2030.17 As discussed in Appendix A, the Project would generate an electricity demand of 184,156 kilowatt (kWh) per year, or 0.184 gWh per year. This would represent less than one percent of both the annual consumption for electricity for the commercial sector, as well as the projected low/high demand scenario of consumption (and supply ) by the year 2030.

Therefore, the estimated electricity demand for the Project would not increase demand for natural gas beyond the existing projections from the CEC and SCE and no new infrastructure would be necessary to accommodate the Project.

According to the CEC, total natural gas consumption in the SoCal Gas service area in 2022 was 98.80 million therms for the commercial sector. 18 The CEC prepared three scenarios for forecasting future growth in natural gas demand; low -deman
d, mid-deman
d, and high -deman
d. According to the CEC, natural gas
consumption (and supply) in the SoCal Gas service area is forecasted to have a low -dema nd and high -
deman
d scenarios of approximately 7.7 billion therms and 8.3 billion therms, respectively.19 As discussed in Appendix A, the Project would generate demand for natural gas of 173,725 kilo British thermal un its (kBtu) per year, or approximately 1,738 therms per year.20 This represents less than one percent of both the annual consumption for natural gas for the commercial sector and the projected low/high demand scenario

15 C alifornia Energy Commission, “California Energy Demand 2018-2030 Revised Forecast.” Available online at:
https://www.energy.ca.gov/publications/2018/california-energy-demand-2018-2030-revised-forecast, accessed January 14, 2025.
16 Ca lifornia Energy Commission, “Electricity Consumption by Entity.” Available online at:
http://www.ecdms.energy.ca.gov/elecbyutil.aspx, accessed January 14, 2025. 17 California Energy Commission, “California Energy Demand 2018-2030 Revised Forecast.” Available online at:
https://www.energy.ca.gov/publications/2018/california-energy-demand-2018-2030-revised-forecast, accessed January 14, 2025.
18 Ca lifornia Energy Commission, “Gas Consumption by Entity.” Available online at:
http://www.ecdms.energy.ca.gov/gasbyutil.aspx, accessed January 14, 2025. 19 California Energy Commission, “California Energy Demand 2018-2030 Revised Forecast.” Available online at:
https://www.energy.ca.gov/publications/2018/california-energy-demand-2018-2030-revised-forecast, accessed January 14, 2025.
20 1 kBtu = 1 Btu = 1.0-5 U.S Therm

3.0 Categorical Exemption Analysis
Impact Sciences, Inc. 3.0-23 Fit 7 Sports Lab Development Project 1489.001 February 2025
of consumption (and supply) for natural gas by the year 2030. Therefore, the estimated natural gas consumption and supply for the Project would not increase demand for natural gas beyond the existing projections and no new infrastructure would be necessary to accommodate the Project.

The Project would also adhere to the City’s general design requirements and utilize low-energy LED light bulbs for lighting. Furthermore, per Section 35.098 (Electricity User Tax) of the City’s Municipal Code, the Project Applicant would be required to pay a user’s tax to the City for electrical energy usage. The Project would also be subject to paying all applicable service and activation fees that are imposed by the utility companies that serve the Project Site. Further, the Project would be required to comply with CalGreen Code standards pertaining to energy conservation and efficiency. With compliance to applicable state and local regulations impacts would be less than significant.

Fire Protection
The City of Baldwin Park is contracted with the LACFD for fire protection/emergency services. The East Regional Operations Bureau serves Baldwin Park and reports to the Chief Deputy of Emergency Operations, and includes Division 2, 4, 8, and 9, representing 76 fire stations serving communities within the east side of Los Angeles County. Division 2 of the LACFD serves the City of Baldwin Park. The nearest LACFD fire station to the Project Site is Station No. 46, located 0.96 miles east of the Project Site at 15546 Arrow Highway in the City of Irwindale.

Although the Project would result in an increase in employees in the City, this increase would be nominal.

The Project proposes to designate paths for LACFD fire trucks and hoses, and the Project Applicant would submit all plans to the LACFD for review and approval prior to obtaining any permits. Furthermore, the Project would be subject to Section 150.225 (Adoption) of the City’s Municipal Code, which adopts by reference the 2020 Edition of the Los Angeles County Fire Code and the 2022 Edition of the California Fire Code, which includes site access requirements and fire safety precautions (e.g., fire alarms, sprinkler systems, hydrants, and fire flow requirements). As such, impacts with respect to fire protection would be less than significant.

Police Protection
The City of Baldwin Park Police Department (BPD) provides law enforcement services to the City, including the Project Site. The BPD has implemented multiple community outreach programs to provide

3.0 Categorical Exemption Analysis
Impact Sciences, Inc. 3.0-24 Fit 7 Sports Lab Development Project 1489.001 February 2025
communication and accessibility between the Police Department and the community. 21 Headquarters for the BPD are located approximately 1.32 miles south of the Project Site at 14403 Pacific Avenue.

The Project is not expected to result in a substantial increase in population compared to existing conditions.

The Project would maintain the existing on- site driveways along Joanbridge Street to provide vehicular access to the Project Site. Upon site plan review and approval, the Project Site would meet the LACFD’s fire access requirements, and thus, would also provide adequate emergency access for the BPD. The Project would not result in the need for additional new or altered police protection services and would not alter acceptable service ratios or response times. As such, impacts with respect to police protection would be less than significant.

Schools
The Baldwin Park Unified School District (BPUSD or District) provides educational services to the City of Baldwin Park. The BPUSD currently has 13 elementary schools, 4 middle/junior high schools, and 3 high schools located within the District boundaries.
22 As stated, the Project would not induce a substantial increase in population on -site. As a soccer training facility, the Project would not generate new students and would not require the expansion of school facilities. Additionally, the Project would be subject to Government Code Section 65996, which requires new developments to pay school impact fees to mitigate any impacts of the development on school services.

Therefore, local schools will not be impacted by the Project and potential impacts on the local school system would be less than significant.

Recreation and Parks
A Project could result in a significant impact on local parks if the population disproportionally increases as a result of the development. The nearest public park to the Project Site is Morgan Park, located approximately 1.30 miles southwest of the Project Site at 4100 Baldwin Park Boulevard. It should also be noted that the Project Site is located approximately 0.65 miles south of the Santa Fe Dam Recreation Area, located in the City of Irwindale at 15501 Arrow Highway. The Project would act as a recreational space for its students and would serve to supplement existing recreational spaces. As stated previously, the Project would not induce a substantial increase in population and is not anticipated to generate substantive additional demands for parkland or other recreational facilities. Therefore, it is anticipated that the existing

21 City of Baldwin Park, City of Baldwin Park General Plan, 2002. 22 Baldwin Park Unified School District, “Parent Information.” Available online at:
https://www.bpusd.net/apps/pages/parents, acce ssed September 4, 2024.

3.0 Categorical Exemption Analysis
Impact Sciences, Inc. 3.0-25 Fit 7 Sports Lab Development Project 1489.001 February 2025
nearby parks would be able to adequately serve any demand generated by the Project and potential impacts with respect to parks and recreation would be less than significant.

Libraries
A significant impact could occur if a project includes substantial employment or population growth whose demand would exceed existing library capacity. The City of Baldwin Park is served by the Baldwin Park Library (BPL). The BPL serves a branch of the Los Angeles County library system and offers a variety of services for children and teens.
23 The BPL is located approximately 1.21 southwest of the Project Site at 4181 Baldwin Park Boulevard. As stated above, the Project is not expected to result in a substantial increase in population compared to existing conditions. Potential impacts with respect to libraries would be less than significant.

Summary of Criterion (e)
As demonstrated above, the Project can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services.

As such, the Project meets Criterion (e) in Section 15332 of the State CEQA Guidelines.

Conclusion of Class 32 Categorical Exemption
As demonstrated above, the Project meets all five criteria enumerated for a Class 32 Categorical Exemption under CEQA.

3.2 EXCEPTIONS TO A CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION
This section provides an analysis demonstrating that none of the possible exceptions to a Categorical Exemption listed in Section 15300.2 of the State CEQA Guidelines are applicable to this Project. State CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2 (Exceptions) states:
a) Location. Classes 3, 4, 5, 6, and 11 are qualified by consideration of where the project is to be located – a project that is ordinarily insignificant in its impact on the environment may in a particularly sensitive environment be significant. Therefore, these classes are considered to apply all instances, except where the project may impact on an environmental resource o f hazardous or critical concern where designated, precisely mapped, and officially adopted pursuant to law by federal, state, or local agencies.
b) Cumulative Impact. All exemptions for these classes are inapplicable when the cumulative impact of successive projects of the same type in the same place, over time is significant.

23 Los Angeles County Public Library, “Baldwin Park Library.” Available online at:
https://lacountylibrary.org/baldwin-park-library/, acce ssed September 4, 2024.

3.0 Categorical Exemption Analysis
Impact Sciences, Inc. 3.0-26 Fit 7 Sports Lab Development Project 1489.001 February 2025
c) Significant Effect. A categorical exemption shall not be used for an activity where there is a reasonable possibility that the activity will have a significant effect on the environment due to unusual circumstances.
d) Scenic Highways. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project which may result in damage to scenic resources, including but not limited to, trees, historic buildings, rock outcroppings, or similar resources, within a highway officially designate d as a state scenic highway. This does not apply to improvements which are required as mitigation by an adopted negative declaration or certified EIR.
e) Hazardous Waste Sites. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project located on a site which is included on any list compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code. f) Historical Resources. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project which may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource.

Project Analysis
Section 15300.2 (a) Exception (Applies only to Class 3, 4, 5, 6, or 11) The Project is not pursuing a Class 3, 4, 5, 6, or 11 exemption. As such, this exception does not apply to the Project.

Section 15300.2 (b) Exception
Cumulative impacts are two or more individual effects which, when considered together, are considerable or which compound or increase other environmental impacts ( State CEQA Guidelines Section 15355).

Cumulative impacts may be analyzed by considering a list of past, present, and probable future projects producing related or cumulative impacts. State CEQA Guidelines Section 15130[b] states:

The discussion of cumulative impacts shall reflect the severity of the impacts and their likelihood of occurrence, but the discussion need not provide as great detail as is provided for the effects attributable to the project alone. The discussion should be guided by the standards of practicality and reasonableness, and should focus on the cumulative impact to which the identified other projects contribute rather than the attributes of other projects which do not contribute to the cumulative impact. The following elements are necessary to an adequate discussion of significant cumulative impacts:
(1) Either:
(A) A list of past, present, and probable future projects producing related or cumulative impacts, including, if necessary, those projects outside the control of the agency, or (B) A summary of projections contained in an adopted local, regional or statewide plan, or related planning document, that describes or evaluates conditions contributing to the cumulative effect. Such plans may include: a general plan, regional transportation plan, or

3.0 Categorical Exemption Analysis
Impact Sciences, Inc. 3.0-27 Fit 7 Sports Lab Development Project 1489.001 February 2025
plans for the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions. A summary of projections may also be contained in an adopted or certified prior environmental document for such a plan. Such projections may be supplemented with additional information such as a regional modeling program. Any such document shall be referenced and made available to the public at a location specified by the lead agency.

State CEQA Guidelines Section 15130[d] states:

Previously approved land use documents, including, but not limited to, general plans, specific plans, regional transportation plans, plans for the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, and local coastal plans may be used in cumulative impact analysis. A p ertinent discussion of cumulative impacts contained in one or more previously certified EIRs may be incorporated by reference pursuant to the provisions for tiering and program EIRs. No further cumulative impacts analysis is required when a project is consistent with a general, specific, master or comparable programmatic plan where the lead agency determines that the regional or areawide cumulative impacts of the proposed project have already been adequately addressed, as defined in S ection 15152(f), in a certified EIR for that plan.

There are no planned development project areas located within a 0.5-mile radius of the Project Site. 24 Thus,
the Project’s minimal impacts to the immediate vicinity would not have the potential to combine with a related project to create a significant cumulative impact. Furthermore, as discussed herein, the Project will be consistent with planning and zoning designations for the Project Site and the Project will be consistent with the following local and regional planning documents: City of Baldwin Park General Plan, SCAG’s RTP/SCS, and SCAQMD’s AQMP. Because there are no planned development projects located in th e immediate vicinity of the Project Site and because the Project will be consistent with local and regional plans, the Project will not have the potential to contribute to a local or regional significant cumulative impact.

Section 15300.2 (c) Exception
There are no unusual circumstances associated with the Project Site or the Project that would create a reasonable possibility of significant effects to the environment. The Project Site is located within an urban environment and is surrounded by industrial, commercial residential uses. The Project Site will be redeveloped as a soccer training facility that would serve as a recreational facility for residents within the Project area. Moreover, the Lead Agency has not identified any unusual circumstances applicable to the Project. As such, this exception does not apply to the Project.

24 City of Baldwin Park, “Redevelopment Project Areas.” Available online at:
https://www.baldwinpark.com/240/Redevelopment-Project-Areas, accessed S eptember 4, 2024.

3.0 Categorical Exemption Analysis
Impact Sciences, Inc. 3.0-28 Fit 7 Sports Lab Development Project 1489.001 February 2025
Section 15300.2 (d) Exception
Caltrans maintains a list of highways that are designated and/or are eligible for designation as a state scenic highway. Based on that list, the Project Site is not located within or near any highway that is designated as a state scenic highway, nor is it located within or near any highway that has been identified by Caltrans as a highway that is eligible for the scenic highway designation . The nearest designated, or eligible for designation, State scenic highway is State Route 39 (SR-39), located approximately 3.20 miles northeast of the Project Site.
25 Due to this distance, as well as the topography and intervening objects (i.e., trees and buildings), the SR-39 is not visible from the Project Site. Therefore, this exception does not apply to the Project.

Section 15300.2 (e) Exception
California Government Code Section 65962.5 requires various State agencies to compile lists of hazardous waste disposal facilities, unauthorized releases from underground storage tanks, contaminated drinking water wells, and solid waste facilities where there is known migration of hazardous waste and submit such information to the Secretary for Environmental Protection on at least an annual basis. A significant impact may occur if a Project Site is included on any of the above lists and poses an environment al hazard to surrounding sensitive uses.

There are no known hazardous sites associated with the Project Site according to the California Department of Toxic Substances Control’s (DTSC) EnviroStor database, 26 the California State Water Resources Controle
Board (SWRCB) GeoTracker database,27 and DTSC’s current “Cortese” list.28 Therefore, as the Project Site is not located on a hazardous waste site and no potentially significant hazardous impacts will result, this exception is not applicable to the Project.

25 California Department of Transportation, “California State Scenic Highway System Map,” Available online at:
https://caltrans.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=465dfd3d807c46cc8e8057116f1aacaa, accessed September 4, 2024.
26 E nvirostor, Project Search Results, Available online at:
https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/search?CMD=search&city=Baldwin+Park&zip=&county=&case_numb er=&business_name=&FEDERAL_SUPERFUND=True&STATE_RESPONSE=True&VOLUNTARY_CLEANUP=T rue&SCHOOL_CLEANUP=True&CORRECTIVE_ACTION=True&tiered_permit=True&evaluation=True&operat ing=True&post_closure=True&non_operating=True&inspections=True&inspectionsother=True, accessed September 4, 2024.
27 C alifornia State Water Resources Control Board, GeoTracker. Available online at:
https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/map/?CMD=runreport&myaddress=14412+Joanbridge+Street+Baldwin+Pa rk, September 4, 2024.
28 California Environmental Protection Agency, “Cortsee List Date Resources.” Available at:
https://calepa.ca.gov/sitecleanup/corteselist, September 4, 2024.

3.0 Categorical Exemption Analysis
Impact Sciences, Inc. 3.0-29 Fit 7 Sports Lab Development Project 1489.001 February 2025
Section 15300.2 (f) Exception
Section 15064.5 of the State CEQA Guidelines defines a historical resource as:
1) a resource listed in or determined to be eligible by the State Historical Resources Commission, for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources; 2) a resource listed in a local register of historical resources or identified as significant in an historical resource survey meeting certain state guidelines; or 3) an object, building, structure, site, area, place, record or manuscript which a lead agency determines to be significant in the architectural, engineering, scientific, economic, agricultural, educational, social, political, military, or cultural annals of California, provided that the lead agency’s determination is supported by substantial evidence in light of the whole record.

A significant adverse effect would occur if a project were to adversely affect a historical resource meeting one of the above definitions. A substantial adverse change in the significance of a historic resource means demolition, destruction, relocation, or alteration of the resource or its immediate surroundings such that the significance of a historical resource would be materially impaired.

Generally, a lead agency must consider a property a historical resource under CEQA if it is eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources (the “California Register”). The California Register is modeled after the National Register of Historic Places (the “National Register”). Furthermore, a property is presumed to be historically significant if it is listed in a local register of historical resources or has been identified as historically significant in a historic resources survey (provided certain criteria and requirements are satisfied) unless a preponderance of evidence demonstrates that the property is not historically or culturally significant.
29 The existing Project Site includes two buildings located on parcels that are currently zoned by the City as Industrial. A records search was conducted by the South -Central Coastal Information Center (SCCIC) to determine if any state or federally designated historical resources identified either on -site or within the immediate vicinity of the Project Site ( See Appendix E). The records determined that the Project Site was not found to be a historical place or have historical resources on the National Register of Historic Places and California Historical Resources Register. No historical resources would be demolished, altered, or relocated because of the Project, and thus, the Project would have no direct or indirect impacts on historical resources. The Project would also not impact any known historical resources in the vicin ity of the Project Site. Therefore, as the Project would not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource, this exception is not applicable to the Project.

29 Public Resources Code Section 5024.1 and 14 California Code of Regulations Section 4850.

3.0 Categorical Exemption Analysis
Impact Sciences, Inc. 3.0-30 Fit 7 Sports Lab Development Project 1489.001 February 2025
Conclusion
As demonstrated above, none of the six exceptions to a Categorical Exemption are applicable to the Project.

As the Project meets all five criteria enumerated for a Class 32 Categorical Exemption under CEQA and no exceptions are applicable, the Project therefore qualifies for a Categorical Exemption under CEQA. No further analysis is required.

3.3 REFERENCES
Baldwin Park Unified School District, “Parent Information.” Available online at:
https://www.bpusd.net/apps/pages/parents, accessed September 4, 2024.

California Air Resources Board, “In-Use Off-Road Diesel-Fueled Fleets Regulation.” Available online at:
https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/our-work/programs/use-road-diesel-fueled-fleets-regulation/about, accessed February 4, 2025.

California Department of Transportation, “California State Scenic Highway System Map,” Available onli
ne at: https://caltrans.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=465dfd3d807c46cc 8e8057116f1aacaa, accessed September 4, 2024.

California Environmental Protection Agency, “Cortsee List Data Resources.” Available online at:
https://calepa.ca.gov/sitecleanup/corteselist, September 4, 2024.

California State Water Resources Control Board, GeoTracker, available at:
https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/map/?CMD=runreport&myaddress=14412+Joanbridge+Str eet+Baldwin+Park, September 4, 2024.

California Department of Toxic Substances Control, Envirostor, Project Search Results, Available at:
https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/search?CMD=search&city=Baldwin+Park&zip=&count y=&case_number=&business_name=&FEDERAL_SUPERFUND=True&STATE_RESPONSE=True &VOLUNTARY_CLEANUP=True&SCHOOL_CLEANUP=True&CORRECTIVE_ACTION=True &tiered_permit=True&evaluation=True&operating=True&post_closure=True&non_operating=Tr ue&inspections=True&inspectionsother=True, accessed September 4, 2024.

CalRecycle, “Jurisdiction Disposal and Alternative Daily Cover (ADC) Tons by Facility.” Available online at: https://www2.calrecycle.ca.gov/LGCentral/DisposalReporting/Destination/DisposalByFacility, accessed September 4, 2024..

City of Baldwin Park, City of Baldwin Park General Plan, 200 2.

City of Baldwin Park, “Redevelopment Project Areas.” Available online at:
https://www.baldwinpark.com/240/Redevelopment-Project-Areas, accessed September 4, 2024.

City of Baldwin Park. “Appendix Zoning Map.” Available online at:
https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/baldwinpark/latest/baldwinpark_ca/0-0-0-12598, accessed January 30, 2025.

3.0 Categorical Exemption Analysis
Impact Sciences, Inc. 3.0-31 Fit 7 Sports Lab Development Project 1489.001 February 2025
Federal Transit Administration, Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual, September 2018.

Federal Transit Administration, Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual, Table 7-2 (General Assessment Construction Noise Criteria), September 2018.

Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts, “San Jose Creek Water Reclamation Plant.” Available online at https://www.lacsd.org/services/wastewater-se wage/facilities/san-jose-creek-water-reclamation- plant, accessed September 4, 2024.

Los Angeles County Sanitation District, “Table 1, Loadings for Each Class of Land Use.” Available online at: https://www.lacsd.org/home/showpublisheddocument/8639/637921797286370000, accessed September 4, 2024.

Los Angeles County Public Library, “Baldwin Park Library.” Available online at:
ht
tps://lacountylibrary.org/baldwin-park-library/, accessed September 4, 2024.

Public Resources Code Section 5024.1 and 14 California Code of Regulations Section 4850 Valley County Water District, “Service Area Map.” Available online at:
https://www.vcwd.org/DocumentCenter/View/126/Valley-Co unty-Water-District-Service-Area- Map-PDF, accessed September 4, 2024.

Valley County Water District, “About Us.” Available online at: https://www.vcwd.org/27/About-Us, Accessed September 4, 2024.

APPENDIX A
Air Quality Impact Analysis
811 W. 7th Street, Suite 200
Los Angeles, CA 90017
(213) 935-1901
www.impactsciences.com

PROJECTS THROUGHOUT CALIFORNIA

MEMORANDUM

To: Melanie Chipres, Associate Planner, City of Baldwin Park Job No. 1489.001 From: Brett Pomeroy, Associate Principal, Impact Sciences Subject: Air Quality Impact Analysis for the
Fit 7 Sports Lab Development Project
Date: October 14, 2024

1. INTRODUCTION
This Air Quality Memorandum evaluates air quality impacts associated with the proposed Fit 7 Sports Lab Development Project (the “Project”) in the City of Baldwin Park (City). This memorandum has been prepared by Impact Sciences, Inc., to support the Project’s environmental documentation being prepared pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). This analysis considers both the temporary air quality impacts from Project construction and long- term impacts associated with operation of the Project.

Project Location
The proposed Fit 7 Sports Lab Development Project (Project) would involve improvements to two adjacent lots located at 14412 Joanbridge Street (Assessment Parcel Number [APN] 8414-023-011) and 14424 Joanbridge Street (APN 8414- 023-010) in the City of Baldwin Park (City). The Project would merge the two adjacent lots as one property (Project Site).

The Project Site is located within the northern perimeter of Baldwin Park’s jurisdiction limits, located approximately 1.30 miles east of Interstate 605 (I-605) and 1.96 miles south of Interstate 210 (I-210) (see Figure 1, Regional Location). The Project Site is primarily accessible by East Joanbridge Street, located north of the Project Site.

The Project Site is developed and located within a heavily urbanized area of the City. According to the City of Baldwin Park General Plan (dated 2020), the Project Site is currently designated for General Industrial land uses. Concurrently, the Project Site is zoned Industrial by the City of Baldwin Park Zoning Map.

Project Description
The Project would merge the properties located at 14412 and 14424 Joanbridge Street into one property totaling approximately 26,244 square feet. The Project would repurpose the 14412 Joanbridge Street building into a n indoor soccer training facility with a bathroom and gym downstairs and a mezzanine upstairs. The Project would also demolish the 14424 Joanbridge Street building and construct ground floor parking with covered rooftop soccer fields. Hours of operation would occur between the hours of 4:00 P.M. and 10:00 P.M. on weekdays, 9:00 A.M. and 6:00 P.M. on Saturdays, and 8:00 A.M. to 2:00 P.M. on Sundays.

Ground Floor
The Project would repurpose the existing building and demolish the existing trash enclosure at 14412 Joanbridge Street into a two-story soccer training facility. The first floor of the facility would include a meeting room, a gymnasium room, ADA-compliant restrooms, and a 6,625 square foot indoor soccer field equipped with two nets and one bench, and one water fountain (see Figure 2, Conceptual Site Plan-Floor 1). ¯
0 100 20050 Miles
Esri, NASA, NGA, USGS, County of Los Angeles, California State Parks, Esri, HERE, Garmin, SafeGraph, METI/NASA, USGS, Bureau of Land Management, EPA, NPS, USDA City of Baldwin Park
Project Site
Regional Location Map
FIGURE 1
1489.001•01/23
SOURCE: Esri, 2023

PL PL
PLPL
PL
PL
PL
PL
PL
175'-0"
PL
93'-2"
53'-5"

MEN WOMEN

MEETING
ROOM
GYM
ROOM
4'-0"12'-4"
15'-0"
4'-0"18'-0"
28'-7"
5'-0"
9'-4" 10'-6" 7'-11"93'-2"
124'-3"
40'-6"5'-0"
42'-9"
4'-0"
4'-0"
4'-0"
4'-0"
7'-2"

EXISTING BUILDING
55'-9"
8'-1"

EXISTING

ROLL UP
DOOR
PL PL

FIRE TRUCK PATH
26' BY 99'-4"
END OF

FIRE TRUCK
26'-0"
01 02
03 04
05 13
14 15
16 38
21 22
27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35
32'-6"
3'-0"
24'-0"
24'-0"
26'-0"
3'-3"
24'-0"
ADA
9'-0"5'-0"
18'-0"26
14412 JOANBRIDGE St.

INPATH OF TRAVEL

PATH OF TRAVEL OUT
8'-6"
18'-0"
8'-2"
12'-11"
10'-6"
11'-8"
9'-4"
5'-0"
18'-0"
24'-0"
18'-0"
14424 JOANBRIDGE St.
75'-0"
FIRE
HOSE
PATH
75'-0"75'-0"
150' MAX. TO

FIRE TRUCK
75'+75'=150'
150' MAX. TO

FIRE TRUCK
75'+75'=150'
SOCCER COURT 1
8'-6"
75'-0"75'-0"
11 3
3 2
2 12'-0"15'-2"
75'-0"75'-0"
150'-0"
39 8'-6"
18'-0"
06 07
08 19 20
09 10
11 12
36 37
ADA
9'-0"
18'-0"
7 Parking Spaces
32 Parking Spaces25

ELEVATOR
3'-0"
8'-6"
5'-0"
3'-0"

DECK EDGE ABOVE
M.RRW.RR
HALL
12'-6"
4'-0"7'-1"12'-6"
11'-6"
17 18
6'-0"
16'-0"
5'-0"
23 24
5'-0"
44 Lot Size: 13,122 sq.ft.
14412 + 14424 JOANBRIDGE St.

Parking = 39 Spaces
Lot Size: 13,122 sq.ft.
25'-3"
26'-6"
5'-0"5'-0" to PL

1. VENDING MACHINE

EPEX BEVERAGE
COMBO 32d x 35w x 77 h
1 TRASH ENCLOSURE
Trinidad Campbell
Design & Building
3829 Ronda Vista Pl. Los Angeles, CA. 90027
(323)497-9969
[email protected]
Project Number
Date
Drawn By
Scale
FIT 7 LAB
14412 & 14424 JOANBRIDGE St.

BALDWIN PARK
LOS ANGELES, CA 91706
Architect
Alejandro Resendiz
52 Carrige Way. Pomona, CA. 91766
(909)456-4506
[email protected]
MAY 25/2023
A-1.1
GLRS
2210 BAL

FIRST FLOOR
PLAN
1/8" = 1'-0" 1/8" = 1'-0"1 GROUND FLOOR PLAN
N
12/19/2022
Conceptual Site Plan - Floor 1
FIGURE 2
1489.001•10/23
SOURCE: Trinidad Campbell, 2022

Impact Sciences, Inc. 4 Fit 7 Sports Lab Development Project Air Quality Memorandum 1489.001 October 2024
The property’s existing driveway would serve as the main exit for vehicles from the Project Site. A 2,446 square foot driving lane would be provided for visiting vehicles as an egress route and utilized as an emergency fire truck lane for the Los Angeles County Fire Department (LACFD). Additionally, approximately seven ground- level parking spaces would be provided within this property.

The Project would demolish the existing 5,000 square foot building at 14424 Joanbridge Street and construct ground floor parking with rooftop soccer fields. As shown in Figure 2 , the Project would provide approximately 3 9 ground- level parking spaces including two ADA-compliant parking spaces within this property. Parking would be covered with a cement slab supported by columns and beams. The Project would utilize the property’s existing driveway as the main vehicular entrance to the Project Site, and a one- way driving lane would be included to guide vehicular circulation.

Additionally, an outdoor trash enclosure would be provided within this property.

Second Floor
At 14412 Joanbridge Street, the second level of the new facility would include the mezzanine, consisting of four office spaces, a kitchen, and a restroom (see Figure 3, Conceptual Site Plan-Floor 2).

On the southern side of the second-floor level, the Project would also include a 2,314 square foot soccer field, equipped with two soccer nets, one bench, and a drinking water fountain. The soccer field would be directly above the parking area on the first floor. Nets would be installed to divide soccer field locations and shield visitors from any soccer balls that leave the soccer field. Access to the second floor of the proposed facility would be provided via stairs, and access to the proposed outdoor soccer field would be provided via an elevator and stairs.

At 14424 Joanbridge Street, the second-floor level includes three outdoor soccer fields (that total approximately 10,618 square feet) above the proposed ground- level parking. As shown in Figure 3 , each soccer field would be equipped with two soccer nets and benches. Nets would be installed between each soccer field to shield facility users from any soccer balls that leave the soccer field. Access to the second level would be provided via staircase s and the proposed elevator located on the 14412 Joanbridge Street property.

2. AIR QUALITY SETTING
South Coast Air Basin
The Project Site is located within the Los Angeles County portion of the South Coast Air Basin (Basin). The Basin includes all of Orange County and the non-desert portions of Los Angeles, San Bernardino, and Riverside Counties. The regional climate within the Basin is considered semi -arid and is characterized by warm summers, mild winters, infrequent seasonal rainfall, moderate daytime onshore breezes, and moderate humidity. The air quality within the Basin is primarily influenced by meteorological conditions and a wide range of emissions sources – such as dense population centers, heavy vehicular traffic, and industry. The South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) divides the Basin into source receptor areas (SRAs) in which monitoring stations operate to monitor the various concentrations of air pollutants in the region. The Project Site is located within SRA 9, which covers the East San Gabriel Valley area.

The SCAQMD is the air pollution control district for Orange County and the non -desert portions of Los Angeles, Riverside, and San Bernardino Counties. The agency’s primary responsibility is ensuring that the Basin region meets attainment for the federal an d state standards. The SCAQMD is responsible for preparing an air quality management plan in order to meet federal attainment status. The SCAQMD is also responsible for adopting and enforcing rules and regulations concerning air pollutant sources, issuing permits for stationary sources of air pollutants, inspecting stationary sources of air pollutants, responding to citizen complaints, monitoring ambient air quality and meteorological conditions, awarding grants to reduce motor vehicle emissions, and conduc ting public education campaigns, as well as many other activities. All projects are subject to SCAQMD rules and regulations in effect at the time of construction.

175'-0"
175'-0"
75'-0"
75'-0"
PL
PLPL
75'-0"
PL PL
PL
7'-6"
8'-4"7'-7"
7'-6"
6'-0"
3'-6" 7'-11"30'-93
4"
13'-4"
13'-2"
10'-83
4"
11'-6"
10'-83
4" 22'-103
4"
10'-33
4"
10'-33
4"
OFFICE 3 OFFICE 4
OFFICE 1 OFFICE 2

RR KITCHEN
PL PL
3'-0"
4'-0"
3'-0"
3'-0"
53'-7"
31'-73
4"
4'-0" 4'-0"
8'-0"
6'-0"48'-7" 48'-7" 6'-0" 48'-7"
55'-10"4'-0"
26'-8"
5'-0"
SOCCER FIELD 2
SOCCER FIELD 3 SOCCER FIELD 4 SOCCER FIELD 5
NET
NET
NET
31'-7"
26'-0"
53'-5"
94'-1"
55'-10" 4'-0"
4'-0"
150'-0"
75'-0"
14412 JOANBRIDGE St.

LOT SIZE = 13,222 sq.ft
14424 JOANBRIDGE St.

LOT SIZE = 13,222 sq.ft
UPPER FLOOR +12'-6" @ +12'6"
4 SOCCER FIELDS
WITH NET ABOVE @ +25'
11 3
3 2
2 4'-0"
3'-0"
28'-7"
54'-10"
55'-10"4'-0"
4'-0"
55'-73
4"
46'-101
2"15'-0"47'-11"
14'-8"
1 2 Diagonal =
Steps to be no more than
93'-4" separate

ELEVATOR
8'-6"
3'-0" 10'-0" 52'-0"
5'-0"
108'-7"
218'-2" 44
TOTAL 1st floor plan = 6,625 sq ft
TOTAL MEZZANINE = 1,650 sq ft
2,314 sq ft
1,586 sq ft
3,410 sq ft 3,438 sq ft 3,770 sq ft
6,625 sq ft

TOTAL CONCRETE UPPER
SLAB ON 14412; 14424=
14,518 sq.ft.
5'-0"

MEETING
ROOM
5'-0" to PL
5'-0" to PL
Trinidad Campbell
Design & Building
3829 Ronda Vista Pl. Los Angeles, CA. 90027
(323)497-9969
[email protected]
Project Number
Date
Drawn By
Scale
FIT 7 LAB
14412 & 14424 JOANBRIDGE St.

BALDWIN PARK
LOS ANGELES, CA 91706
Architect
Alejandro Resendiz
52 Carrige Way. Pomona, CA. 91766
(909)456-4506
[email protected]
MAY 25/2023
A-1.2
GLRS
2210 BAL

SECOND FLOOR
PLAN
1/8" = 1'-0"
N
1/8" = 1'-0"1 SECOND FLOOR PLAN
N
12/19/2022
Conceptual Site Plan - Floor 2
FIGURE 3
1489.001•10/23
SOURCE: Trinidad Campbell, 2022

Impact Sciences, Inc. 6 Fit 7 Sports Lab Development Project Air Quality Memorandum 1489.001 October 2024
SCAQMD Rules and Regulations
The following is a list of noteworthy SCAQMD rules that are required of construction activities associated with the Project:
• Rule 402 (Nuisance) – This rule prohibits the discharge from any source whatsoever such quantities of air contaminants or other material which cause injury, detriment, nuisance, or annoyance to any considerable number of persons or to the public, or which endanger the comfort , repose, health, or safety of any such persons or the public, or which cause, or have a natural tendency to cause, injury or damage to business or property. This rule does not apply to odors emanating from agricultural operations necessary for the growing of crops or the raising of fowl or animals.
• Rule 403 (Fugitive Dust) – This rule requires fugitive dust sources to implement best available control measures for all sources, and all forms of visible particulate matter are prohibited from crossing any property line. This rule is intended to reduce PM10 emissions (particulate matter with a diameter of 10 micrometers or smaller) from any transportation, handling, construction, or storage activity that has the potential to generate fugitive dust. PM10 suppression techniques are summarized below.
− Portions of a construction site to remain inactive longer than a period of three months will be seeded and watered until grass cover is grown or otherwise stabilized. − All on-site roads will be paved as soon as feasible or watered periodically or chemically stabilized. − All material transported off -site will be either sufficiently watered or securely covered to prevent excessive amounts of dust.
− The area disturbed by clearing, grading, earthmoving, or excavation operations will be minimized at all times. − Where vehicles leave a construction site and enter adjacent public streets, the streets will be swept daily or washed down at the end of the work day to remove soil tracked onto the paved surface. • Rule 1113 (Architectural Coatings) – This rule requires manufacturers, distributors, and end-uses of architectural and industrial maintenance coatings to reduce reactive organic gas (ROG) emissions from the use of these coatings, primarily by placing limits on the ROG content of various coating categories.

Local
City of Baldwin Park General Plan
Applicable goals and policies related to air quality from the City of Baldwin Park General Plan (General Plan) Air Quality Element are listed below:

Goal 1.0 Improve air quality by reducing the amount of air pollution through proper land use planning.

Policy 1.2 Locate multiple family developments close to commercial areas to encourage pedestrian rather than vehicular travel.

Policy 1.4 Provide for the enhancement of neighborhood commercial centers to provide services within walking distance of residential neighborhoods.

Policy 1.5 Encourage the design of new residential and commercial areas to foster pedestrian circulation.

Impact Sciences, Inc. 7 Fit 7 Sports Lab Development Project Air Quality Memorandum 1489.001 October 2024

3. THRESHOLDS OF SIGNIFICANCE
Consistency with the Applicable Air Quality Management Plan The SCAQMD has adopted criteria for consistency with regional plans and the regional Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) in its CEQA Air Quality Handbook. Specifically, the indicators of consistency are: 1) whether the Project would increase the frequency or severity of existing air quality violations or cause or contribute to new air quality violations; and 2) whether the Project would exceed the assumptions utilized in preparing the AQMP.

Violation of Standards or Substantial Contribution to Air Quality Violations As the agency principally responsible for comprehensive air pollution control in the Basin, the SCAQMD recommends that projects should be evaluated in terms of air pollution control thresholds established by the SCAQMD and published in the CEQA Air Quality Handbook. These thresholds were developed by the SCAQMD to provide quantifiable levels to which Projects can be compared. The most current significance thresholds, shown in Table 1, South Coast AQMD Regional Significance Thresholds, are used in this analysis.

Table 1
South Coast AQMD Air Quality Significance Thresholds

Mass Daily Thresholds a
Pollutant Construction b Operation c
NOx 100 lbs/day 55 lbs/day
VOC 75 lbs/day 55 lbs/day
PM10 150 lbs/day 150 lbs/day
PM2.5 55 lbs/day 55 lbs/day
SOx 150 lbs/day 150 lbs/day
CO 550 lbs/day 550 lbs/day
Lead 3 lbs/day 3 lbs/day
Toxic Air Contaminants (TACs), Odor, and GHG Thresholds TACs
(including carcinogens and non-
carcinogens)
Maximum Incremental Cancer Risk ≥ 10 in 1 million
Cancer Burden > 0.5 excess cancer cases (in areas ≥ 1 in 1 million) Chronic & Acute Hazard Index ≥ 1.0 (Project increment)
Odor Project creates an odor nuisance pursuant to South Coast AQMD Rule 402 GHG 10,000 MT/yr CO2eq for industrial facilities
Ambient Air Quality Standards for Criteria Pollutants d NO2

1-hour average
annual arithmetic mean
South coast AQMD is in attainment; Project is significant if it causes or contributes to an exceedance of the following attainment standards:

0.18 ppm (state)

0.03 ppm (state) and 0.0534 ppm (federal)
PM10
24-hour average
annual average

10.4 µg/m3 (construction) e & 2.5 µg/m3 (operation)

1.0 µg/m3
PM2.5
24-hour average 10.4 µg/m3 (construction) e & 2.5 µg/m3 (operation)

Impact Sciences, Inc. 8 Fit 7 Sports Lab Development Project Air Quality Memorandum 1489.001 October 2024
SO2
1-hour average
24-hour average

0.25 ppm (state) & 0.075 ppm (federal - 99th percentile)

0.04 ppm (state)
Sulfate
24-hour average 25 µg/m3 (state)
CO

1-hour average
8-hour average
South Coast AQMD is in attainment; Project is significant if it causes or contributes to an exceedance of the following attainment standards:
20 ppm (state) and 35 ppm (federal)

9.0 ppm (state/federal)
Ambient Air Quality Standards for Criteria Pollutants d (continued) Lead
30-day Average
Rolling 3-month average

1.5 µg/m3 (state)

0.15 µg/m3 (federal)
a Source: South Coast AQMD CEQA Handbook (South Coast AQMD, 1993) b Construction thresholds apply to both the South Coast Air Basin and Coachella Valley (Salton Sea and Mojave Desert Air Basins ). c For Coachella Valley, the mass daily thresholds for operation are the same as the construction thresholds. d Ambient air quality thresholds for criteria pollutants based on South Coast AQMD Rule 1303, Table A-2 unless otherwise stated. e Ambient air quality threshold based on South Coast AQMD Rule 403.

Exposure of Sensitive Receptors to Substantial Pollutant Concentrations The SCAQMD currently recommends that impacts to sensitive receptors be considered significant when a project generates localized pollutant concentrations of nitrogen dioxide (NO 2), carbon monoxide (CO), PM10, or PM2.5 (particulate matter with a diameter of 2.5 micrometers or smaller) at sensitive receptors near a project site that exceed the localized pollutant concentration thresholds listed above or when a project’s traffic cause s CO concentrations at sensitive receptors located near congested intersections to exceed the national or state ambient air quality standards.

The roadway CO thresholds would also apply to the contribution of emissions associated with cumulative development. Additionally, the SCAQMD recommends impacts to sensitive receptors be considered significant if a project exceeds the TAC thresholds detailed in Table 1 above.

In addition, the SCAQMD has established localized significance criteria in the form of ambient air quality standards for criteria pollutants. To minimize the need for detailed air quality modeling to assess localized impacts, SCAQMD developed mass-based localized significance thresholds (LSTs) that are the number of pounds of emissions per day that can be generated by a project that would cause or contribute to adverse localized air quality impacts. These localized thresholds, are found in the mass rate loo k-up tables in the “Final Localized Significance Threshold Methodology” document prepared by the SCAQMD.
1 LSTs represent the maximum emissions from a project that are not expected to cause or contribute to an exceedance of the most stringent applicable federal or state ambient air quality standards, and are developed based on the ambient concentrations of that pollutant for each SRA.

Exposure to Objectionable Odors
A significant impact may occur if objectionable odors occur that would adversely impact sensitive receptors. Odors are typically associated with industrial projects involving the use of chemicals, solvents, petroleum products, and other strong-smelling elements used in manufacturing processes, as well as sewage treatment facilities and landfills.

1 SCAQMD, Final Localized Significance Threshold Methodology, June 2003, Revised July 2008. Available online at:
http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-sou rce/ceqa/handbook/localized-significance-thresholds/final-lst-methodology- document.pdf, Accessed March 6, 2023.

Impact Sciences, Inc. 9 Fit 7 Sports Lab Development Project Air Quality Memorandum 1489.001 October 2024

4. PROJECT IMPACTS
AQMP Consistency
As part of its enforcement responsibilities, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) requires each state with nonattainment areas to prepare and submit a State Implementation Plan (SIP) that demonstrates the means to attain the federal standards. The SIP must integrate federal, state, and local plan components and regulations to identify specific measures to reduce pollution in nonattainment areas, using a combination of performance standards and market -based programs. Similarly, under state law, the California Clean Air Act (CCAA) requires an air quality attainment plan to be prepared for areas designat ed as nonattainment with regard to the federal and state ambient air quality standards. Air quality attainment plans outline emissions limits and control measures to achieve and maintain these standards by the earliest practical date.

Drafted by the SCAQMD, the 2022 AQMP2 was developed in effort with the California Air Resources Board (CARB), the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), and the U.S. EPA to establish a program of rules and regulations to reduce air pollutant emissions to achieves California Ambient Air Quality Standards (CAAQS) and National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). The plan’s pollutant control strategies are based on SCAG’s 2020 -2045 Regional Transportation Plan / Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS).

Criteria for determining consistency with the AQMP are defined in Chapter 12, Section 12.2 and Section 12.3 of the SCAQMD’s 1993 CEQA Air Quality Handbook, and include the following:
• Consistency Criterion No. 1: The proposed Project will not result in an increase in the frequency or severity of an existing air quality violation, or cause or contribute to new violations, or delay the timely attainment of air quality standards or the interim emissions reductions specified in the AQMP. • Consistency Criterion No. 2: The proposed Project will not exceed the assumptions in the AQMP or increments based on the years of the Project build-out phase.

With respect to the first criterion, area air quality planning, including the AQMP, assumes that there will be emissions from new growth, but that such emissions may not impede the attainment and may actually contribute to the attainment of applicable air quality standards within the Basin. As discussed herein, the Project would not result in construction air quality emissions that exceed the SCAQMD thresholds of significance. Construction-related emissions would be temporary in nature, lasting only for the duration of the construction period, and would not have a long - term impact on the region’s ability to meet state and federal air quality standards. Furthermore, the Project will be required to comply with applicable SCAQMD rules and regulations for new or modified sources. For example, the Project must comply with SCAQMD Rule 403 for the control of fugitive dust during construction. By meeting SCAQMD rules and regulations, Project construction activities will be consistent with the goals and objectives of the AQMP to improve air quality in the Basin. Also discussed in Table 3, Long-Term Operational Emissions – Maximum Pounds per Day , the Project would not result in operational air quality emissions that exceed the SCAQMD thresholds of significance. Thus, the Project would be consistent with first criterion.

With respect to the second criterion, the AQMP was prepared to achieve national and state air pollution standards within the region. A project that is considered to be consistent with the AQMP would be consistent with the AQMP goals because the growth from the p roject is included in the regional projections used to formulate the AQMP.

Therefore, projects, land uses, and activities that are consistent with the applicable assumptions used in the development of the AQMP (i.e., the RTP/SCS) would not jeopardize attainment of the air quality levels identified in the AQMP, even if they exceed the SCAQMD’s project -level daily emissions thresholds. In this case, t he Project does not include the addition or removal of housing and thus would have no direct impact on population and housing forecasts

2 South Coast Air Quality Management District, 2022 Air Quality Management Plan. 2022. Available online at:
http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-sou rce/clean-air-plans/air-quality-management-plans/2022-air-quality-management- plan/final-2022-aqmp/final-2022-aqmp.pdf?sfvrsn=16, accessed March 6, 2023.

Impact Sciences, Inc. 10 Fit 7 Sports Lab Development Project Air Quality Memorandum 1489.001 October 2024
for the area. Although the Project could increase employment in the area, such increases would be consistent with the planned growth assumptions utilized in preparing the AQMP. It is anticipated that employees of the Project would primarily consist of existing residents in the Baldwin Park area and would not result in a high number of employees relocating to the region. As such, the Project would not have the potential to conflict with regional growth projections identified in SCAG’s RTP/SCS and the AQMP. Thus, the Project is also consistent with the second criterion. As the Project is consistent with Criterion Nos. 1 and 2, the Project would not conflict with or obstruct implementation of any applicable air quality plan, and this impact is less than significant.

Regional Construction Significance Analysis
A Project may have a significant impact if Project -related emissions would result in a cumulatively considerable net increase for a criteria pollutant for which the region is in nonattainment under applicable federal or state ambient air quality standards. The cumulative analysis of air quality impacts follows the SCAQMD’s guidance such that construction or operational Project emissions will be considered cumulatively considerable if Project-specific emissions exceed an applicable SCAQMD recommended daily threshold.

Under the Project’s original analysis completed in early 2023, it was estimated that the Project would be constructed in approximately 11 months with construction beginning in 2023 and Project operations commencing by mid- 2024.

While construction may not begin until 2025 or beyond, the air quality modeling contained herein represents a worst- case analysis because emission factors improve each year into the future and construction and operational air quality emissions would be lower than those disclosed below. This analysis assumes construction would be undertaken with the following primary construction phases: (1) Demolition, (2) Grading, and (3) Building Construction.

The analysis of regional daily construction emissions has been prepared utilizing the California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod) recommended by the SCAQMD. Predicted maximum daily construction -generated emissions for the Project are summarized in Table 2, Construction -Related Criteria Pollutant and Precursor Emissions – Maximum Pounds per Day. These calculations assume that appropriate dust control measures would be implemented as part of the Project during each phase of development, as specified by SC AQMD Rule 403 (Fugitive Dust). Rule 403 control requirements include but are not limited to: applying water in sufficient quantities to prevent the generation of visible dust plumes; applying soil binders to uncovered areas; reestablishing ground cover as quickly as possible; utilizing a wheel washing system to remove bulk material from tires and vehicle undercarriages before vehicles exit the Project Site; and maintaining effective cover over exposed areas. As shown in Table 2, the peak daily emissions generated during the construction of the Project would not exceed any of the regional emission thresholds recommended by the SCAQMD. Therefore, Project construction would not result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria air pollutant for which the Project region is nonattainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard.

Table 2
Construction-Related Criteria Pollutant and Precursor Emissions – Maximum Pounds per Day

Construction Year ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5
2023 (Year 1) 1.32 12.60 12.00 0.02 2.77 1.58
2024 (Year 2) 0.60 5.80 7.75 0.01 0.41 0.27
Regional Threshold 75 100 550 150 150 55
Exceed? No No No No No No

Source: Impact Sciences. See Appendix A to this memorandum for CalEEMod data.

Note: Project emissions account for the reductions from SCAQMD Rule 403 (Fugitive Dust).

Impact Sciences, Inc. 11 Fit 7 Sports Lab Development Project Air Quality Memorandum 1489.001 October 2024
Regional Operational Significance Analysis
Project-generated emissions would be associated with motor vehicle use, energy use, and area sources, such as the use of landscape maintenance equipment and consumer cleaning products, associated with the operation of the Project. The operational emissions from the Project were calculated with CalEEMod and the operational emissions were compared against SCAQMD regional thresholds to determine Project significance. Long -term operational emissions attributable to the Project are summarized in Table 3, Long-Term Operational Emissions – Maximum Pounds per Day. As shown, the operational emissions generated by the Project would not exceed the regional thresholds of significance set by the SCAQMD.

Table 3
Long-Term Operational Emissions – Maximum Pounds per Day

Source ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5
Area Source 0.34 0.01 1.03 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01
Energy Use < 0.005 0.05 0.04 <0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01
Mobile Source 0.40 0.37 3.74 0.01 0.30 0.06
Total 0.74 0.43 4.81 0.01 0.30 0.06
Regional Threshold 55 55 550 150 150 55
Exceed? No No No No No No

Source: Impact Sciences. See Appendix A to this memorandum for CalEEMod data.

As shown in Table 2 and Table 3 , the Project’s construction and operational emissions would not exceed the SCAQMD’s thresholds for any criteria air pollutants. Thus, the Project would not result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria air pollutant for which the Project region is nonattainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard. These impacts are less than significant.

Air Quality Health Impacts
On December 24, 2018, the California Supreme Court published its opinion on the Sierra Club et al. v. County of Fresno et. Al. (Case No. S219783) which determined that an environmental review must adequately analyze a Project’s potential impacts and inform the public how its bare numbers translate to a potential adverse health impact or explain how existing scientific constraints cannot translate the emissions numbers to the potential health impacts.

Criteria air pollutants are defined as those pollutants for which the federal and state governments have established air quality standards for outdoor or ambient concentrations to protect public health. The national and state ambient air quality standards have been set at levels to protect human health with a determined margin of safety. 3 The Basin is in
state non-attainment for PM2.5, PM10, and Ozone (O 3) and federal non -attainment for PM2.5 and O 3. Therefore, an increase in emissions of particulate matter or ozone precursors (ROG and nitrogen oxide [NOx]) has the potential to push the region further from reaching attainment status and, as a result, are the pollutants of greatest concern in the region. As noted in Table 2 and Table 3 above, the Project will emit criteria air pollutants during construction and operation. However, as shown Table 1 through Table 3, the Project will not exceed SCAQMD threshol ds for ozone precursors (ROG and NOx), PM2.5, PM10, or any other criteria air pollutants, and will not result in a cumulatively significant impact for which the region is in non -attainment. Thus, with respect to the Project’s increase in criteria pollutant emissions, the Project would not have the potential cause significant air quality health impacts.

3 SCAQMD, Guidance Document for Addressing Air Quality Issues in General Plans and Local Planning, May 6, 2005.

Impact Sciences, Inc. 12 Fit 7 Sports Lab Development Project Air Quality Memorandum 1489.001 October 2024
Localized Construction Significance Analysis
The SCAQMD has developed localized significance thresholds (LST) for construction areas that are one, two, and five acres in size to simplify the evaluation of localized emissions. LSTs represent the maximum emissions from a Project that are not expected to c ause or contribute to an exceedance of the applicable federal or State ambient air quality standard. LSTs are provided for each source receptor area (SRA) and various distances from the source of emissions.

The nearest air quality sensitive receptors to the Project Site are residences approximately 15 feet south of the Project Site.

In the case of this analysis, the Project Site is located within SRA 9 – East San Gabriel Valley with receptors located within 25 meters.
4 The closest receptor distance in the SCAQMD’s mass rate look -up tables is 25 meters. Projects that are located closer than 25 meters to the nearest receptor are directed to use the LSTs for receptors located within 25 meters. As the Project Site is less than one acre, LSTs for a one-acre site in SRA 9 with sensitive receptors located within 25 meters were utilized to address the potential localized NOx, CO, PM10, and PM2.5 impacts. As shown in Table 4, Localized Significance of Construction Emissions – Maximum Pounds per Day, the Project would not exceed any of the identified localized thresholds of significance during construction. Therefore, the Project’s construction would not expose sensitive receptors to substantial air pollutant concentrations and these impacts would be less than significant.

Table 4
Localized Significance of Construction Emissions – Maximum Pounds per Day

Construction Phase NOx CO PM10 PM2.5
Demolition 4..99 5.91 0.52 0.25
SCAQMD Localized Thresholds 89 623 5 3
Grading 12.60 11.40 2.67 1.55
SCAQMD Localized Thresholds 89 623 5 3
Building Construction 5.93 7.00 0.28 0.26
SCAQMD Localized Thresholds 89 623 5 3
Exceed? No No No No

Source: Impact Sciences. See Appendix A to this memorandum for CalEEMod data.

Notes: Calculations assume compliance with SCAQMD Rule 403 – Fugitive Dust. The localized thresholds for each phase are based on a 1-acre site with a receptor distance of 25 meters (82 feet) in SCAQMD’s SRA 9.

Localized Operational Significance Analysis
Because LST methodology is applicable to Projects where emission sources occupy a fixed location, LST methodology would typically not apply to the operational phase of a commercial use p roject because emissions for these p rojects are primarily generated by mobile sources traveling on local roadways over generally large distances or areas. LSTs would apply to the operational phase of a Project if the Project includes stationary sources or attracts mobile sources that may spend long periods queuing and idling at the site. For example, the LST methodology applies to operational Projects such as warehouse/transfer facilities.
5 As the Project would not include warehouse or transfer facilities, an operational analysis against the LST methodology is not directly applicable to the Project. Nevertheless, Table 5, Localized Significance of On -Site Operational Emissions – Maximum Pounds per Day , has been included to

4 LSTs based on shorter averaging periods, such as the NO2 and CO LSTs, are applied to receptors such as industrial or commercial facilities since it is reasonable to assume that workers at these sites could be present for periods of one to eight hours. Therefore, this analysis evaluates localized air quality impacts from construction activities associated with the Project on sensitive receptors for NO2, CO, PM10, and PM2.5, and on “non-sensitive” receptors (e.g., industrial or commercial facilities) for NO2 and CO. 5 SCAQMD, Sample Construction Scenarios for Projects Less than Five Acres in Size, February 2005, page 1-3.

Impact Sciences, Inc. 13 Fit 7 Sports Lab Development Project Air Quality Memorandum 1489.001 October 2024
illustrate the potential on-site emissions during Project operation. As shown in Table 5, the Project would not exceed any of the identified localized thresholds of significance. Therefore, the Project’s operation would not expose sensitive receptors to substantial air pollutant concentrations and these impacts would be less than significant.

Table 5
Localized Significance of On-Site Operational Emissions – Maximum Pounds per Day

Emissions Source NOx CO PM10 PM2.5
Area Sources 0.01 1.03 < 0.01 < 0.01
Energy Demand 0.05 0.04 < 0.01 < 0.01
Total On-Site Emissions 0.06 1.07 0 0
SCAQMD Localized Thresholds 89 623 2.00 1
Exceed? No No No No

Source: Impact Science. See Appendix A for CalEEMod data.

The Project would not result in potentially significant CO “hot spots” and a Project-specific CO hotspots analysis is not required to reach this conclusion. It has long been recognized that CO exceedances (“hot spots”) are caused by vehicular emissions, primarily when idling at intersections. Vehicle emissions standards have become increasingly more stringent in the last twenty years. With the turnover of older vehicles, introduction of cleaner fuels and implementation of control technology on industrial facilities, CO concentrations for the Project vicinity have historically met state and federal attainment status for the air quality standards. CO concentrations in SRA 9 are substantially below the California one-hour or eight-hour CO standards of 20 or 9.0 parts per million (ppm), respectively. Accordingly, with the steadily decreasing CO emissions from vehicles, even very busy intersections do not result in exceedances of the CO standard.

Therefore, the Project would not have the potential to cause or contribute to an exceedance of the California one-hour or eight-hour CO standards of 20 or 9.0 ppm, respectively. Impacts with respect to localized CO concentrations would be less than significant.

Diesel Particulate Matter
Construction would result in the generation of DPM emissions from the use of off-road diesel equipment required for demolition, grading, building construction, and other construction activities. The amount to which the receptors are exposed (a function of concentration and duration of exposure) is the primary factor used to determine health risk (i.e., potential exposure to TAC emission levels that exceed applicable standards). Health-related risks associated with diesel- exhaust emissions are primarily linked to long-term exposure and the associated risk of contracting cancer.

In March 2015, the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) adopted revised guidelines that update previous guidance by incorporating advances in risk assessment with consideration of infants and children using Age Sensitivity Factors (ASF). The intent of the OEHHA 2015 guidance is to provide Health Risk Assessment (HRA) procedures for use in the Air Toxics Hot Spots Program or for the permitting of existing, new, or modified stationary sources. As the Project is not part of the Air Toxics H ot Spots Program and is considered an urban infill mixed- use development consisting primarily of mobile and area sources (i.e., non-stationary sources), the OEHHA 2015 guidance is not directly applicable. OEHHA 2015 offers limited information on conducting a short-term HRA, but the guidance acknowledges the many inherent uncertainties that may occur, and it does not identify the types of short -term Projects or non - stationary Projects subject thereto. Further, the SCAQMD has not opined on the application of OEHHA 2015 guidance to development Projects such as the Project.

The use of diesel-powered construction equipment would be temporary and episodic. The duration of exposure would be short and exhaust from construction equipment dissipates rapidly. Current methodology for conducting health risk assessments is associated w ith long term exposure periods (9, 30, and 70 years). Therefore, short -term construction activities (such as the Project’s 11-month construction process) would not be expected to generate a significant health risk. Furthermore, the Project Site is approximately 0.60 acres. Generally, construction for Projects contained in a site of

Impact Sciences, Inc. 14 Fit 7 Sports Lab Development Project Air Quality Memorandum 1489.001 October 2024
such size represent less than significant health risks due to limitations in how many pieces of diesel equipment are able to operate on the site. Project construction would also be subject to California regulations limiting the idling of heavy- duty construction equipment to no more than five (5) minutes, which would further reduce nearby sensitive receptors’ exposure to temporary and variable DPM emissions. 6 For these reasons, DPM generated by construction activities would not expose sensitive receptors to substantial amounts of air toxics and these impacts would be less than significant.

Odors
The SCAQMD CEQA Air Quality Handbook (1993) identifies certain land uses as sources of odors. These land uses include agriculture (farming and livestock), wastewater treatment plants, food processing plants, chemical plants, composting facilities, refineries, landfills, dairies, and fiberglass molding. The Project would not include any of the land uses that have been identified by the SCAQMD as odor sources.

Construction activities associated with the Project may generate detectable odors from heavy-duty equipment exhaust and architectural coatings. However, construction-related odors would be short-term in nature and cease upon Project completion. In addition, the Project would be required to comply with the California Code of Regulations, Title 13, sections 2449(d)(3) and 2485, which minimizes the idling time of construction equipment either by shutting it off when not in use or by reducing the time of idling to no more than five minutes. This would reduce the detectable odors from heavy-duty equipment exhaust. The Project would also be required to comply with the SCAQMD Rule 1113 – Architectural Coating, which would minimize odor impacts from ROG emissions during architectural coating. Any odor impacts to existing adjacent land uses would be short-term and not substantial. As such, the Project would not result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people. Impacts would be less than significant.

Conclusion
Tables 2 and 3 demonstrate that the construction and operational emissions are below the regional thresholds of significance established by the SCAQMD. Similarly, Tables 4 and 5 indicate that both construction and operation emissions do not surpass the SCAQMD's localized thresholds of significance. Given the scale of the Project, the health risks are insignificant, largely due to the limited number of diesel -powered equipment that can be deployed on -site.

Moreover, Project construction will adhere to California regulatio ns that cap idling time for heavy -duty construction equipment at five (5) minutes, further minimizing exposure to temporary and variable DPM emissions for nearby sensitive receptors. Additionally, any potential odor impacts to adjacent land uses will be short-term and insubstantial.

Therefore, the air quality impacts from both construction and operation phases of the Project are less than significant.

6 California Air Resources Board, Frequently Asked Questions Regulation for In-Use Off-Road Diesel-Fueled (Off-Road Regulation), 2015.

Available online at: https://ww3.arb.ca.gov/msprog/ordiesel/faq/idlepolicyfaq.pdf.

APPENDIX A
Air Quality
Fit 7 Lab Detailed Report, 1/31/2023
1 / 43
Fit 7 Lab Detailed Report
Table of Contents

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information

1.2. Land Use Types

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector

2. Emissions Summary

2.1. Construction Emissions Compared Against Thresholds

2.2. Construction Emissions by Y ear, Unmitigated

2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds

2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated

3. Construction Emissions Details

3.1. Demolition (2023) - Unmitigated

3.3. Grading (2023) - Unmitigated

3.5. Building Construction (2023) - Unmitigated

3.7. Building Construction (2024) - Unmitigated
Fit 7 Lab Detailed Report, 1/31/2023
2 / 43

4. Operations Emissions Details

4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use

4.1.1. Unmitigated

4.2. Energy

4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated

4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated

4.3. Area Emissions by Source

4.3.2. Unmitigated

4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use

4.4.2. Unmitigated

4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use

4.5.2. Unmitigated

4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use

4.6.1. Unmitigated

4.7. Offroad Emissions By Equipment Type

4.7.1. Unmitigated

4.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment Type
Fit 7 Lab Detailed Report, 1/31/2023
3 / 43

4.8.1. Unmitigated

4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type

4.9.1. Unmitigated

4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type

4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated

4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated

4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated

5. Activity Data

5.1. Construction Schedule

5.2. Off-Road Equipment

5.2.1. Unmitigated

5.3. Construction Vehicles

5.3.1. Unmitigated

5.4. Vehicles

5.4.1. Construction Vehicle Control Strategies

5.5. Architectural Coatings

5.6. Dust Mitigation
Fit 7 Lab Detailed Report, 1/31/2023
4 / 43

5.6.1. Construction Earthmoving Activities

5.6.2. Construction Earthmoving Control Strategies

5.7. Construction Paving

5.8. Construction Electricity Consumption and Emissions Factors

5.9. Operational Mobile Sources

5.9.1. Unmitigated

5.10. Operational Area Sources

5.10.1. Hearths

5.10.1.1. Unmitigated

5.10.2. Architectural Coatings

5.10.3. Landscape Equipment

5.11. Operational Energy Consumption

5.11.1. Unmitigated

5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption

5.12.1. Unmitigated

5.13. Operational Waste Generation

5.13.1. Unmitigated
Fit 7 Lab Detailed Report, 1/31/2023
5 / 43

5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment

5.14.1. Unmitigated

5.15. Operational Off-Road Equipment

5.15.1. Unmitigated

5.16. Stationary Sources

5.16.1. Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps

5.16.2. Process Boilers

5.17. User Defined

5.18. Vegetation

5.18.1. Land Use Change

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated

5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated

5.18.2. Sequestration

5.18.2.1. Unmitigated

6. Climate Risk Detailed Report

6.1. Climate Risk Summary
Fit 7 Lab Detailed Report, 1/31/2023
6 / 43

6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores

6.3. Adjusted Climate Risk Scores

6.4. Climate Risk Reduction Measures

7. Health and Equity Details

7.1. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Scores

7.2. Healthy Places Index Scores

7.3. Overall Health & Equity Scores

7.4. Health & Equity Measures

7.5. Evaluation Scorecard

7.6. Health & Equity Custom Measures

8. User Changes to Default Data
Fit 7 Lab Detailed Report, 1/31/2023
7 / 43

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information
Data Field Value
Project Name Fit 7 Lab
Lead Agency Baldwin Park
Land Use Scale Project/site
Analysis Level for Defaults County
Windspeed (m/s) 1.80
Precipitation (days) 22.4
Location 34.105318024646934, -117.95985130496081
County Los Angeles-South Coast
City Baldwin Park
Air District South Coast AQMD
Air Basin South Coast
TAZ 4911
EDFZ 7
Electric Utility Southern California Edison
Gas Utility Southern California Gas

1.2. Land Use Types
Land Use Subtype Size Unit Lot Acreage Building Area (sq ft) Landscape Area (sq ft)
Special Landscape
Area (sq
ft)
Population Description
City Park 0.20 Acre 0.20 0.00 1,000 1,000 — —
General Office
Building

6.85 1000sqft 0.10 6,854 0.00 — — —
Fit 7 Lab Detailed Report, 1/31/2023
8 / 43
———0.0016,8000.30Space42.0Enclosed Parking
with Elevator

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector No measures selected

2. Emissions Summary

2.1. Construction Emissions Compared Against Thresholds Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Un/Mit. TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 1.57 1.32 12.6 12.0 0.02 0.60 2.17 2.77 0.55 1.02 1.58 — 1,821 1,821 0.07 0.08 1.56 1,829 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 0.76 0.63 6.15 7.72 0.01 0.29 0.15 0.44 0.26 0.04 0.30 — 1,558 1,558 0.06 0.03 0.02 1,569 Average
Daily
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 0.36 0.30 2.92 3.44 0.01 0.14 0.20 0.33 0.12 0.08 0.20 — 658 658 0.03 0.01 0.16 663 Annual
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 0.07 0.06 0.53 0.63 < 0.005 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.02 0.01 0.04 — 109 109 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 110

2.2. Construction Emissions by Y ear, Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Y ear TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Fit 7 Lab Detailed Report, 1/31/2023
9 / 43
Daily -
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2023 1.57 1.32 12.6 12.0 0.02 0.60 2.17 2.77 0.55 1.02 1.58 — 1,821 1,821 0.07 0.08 1.56 1,829 2024 0.72 0.60 5.79 7.75 0.01 0.26 0.15 0.41 0.24 0.04 0.27 — 1,560 1,560 0.06 0.03 0.85 1,572 Daily -
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2023 0.76 0.63 6.15 7.72 0.01 0.29 0.15 0.44 0.26 0.04 0.30 — 1,558 1,558 0.06 0.03 0.02 1,569 2024 0.72 0.60 5.80 7.64 0.01 0.26 0.15 0.41 0.24 0.04 0.27 — 1,554 1,554 0.06 0.03 0.02 1,565 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2023 0.36 0.30 2.92 3.44 0.01 0.14 0.20 0.33 0.12 0.08 0.20 — 658 658 0.03 0.01 0.16 663 2024 0.20 0.17 1.60 2.12 < 0.005 0.07 0.04 0.11 0.07 0.01 0.08 — 429 429 0.02 0.01 0.10 432 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2023 0.07 0.06 0.53 0.63 < 0.005 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.02 0.01 0.04 — 109 109 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 110 2024 0.04 0.03 0.29 0.39 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 0.01 — 71.1 71.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 71.6

2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Un/Mit. TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 0.63 0.74 0.39 4.80 0.01 0.01 0.29 0.30 0.01 0.05 0.06 5.78 1,200 1,206 0.65 0.04 3.41 1,238 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 0.44 0.56 0.41 3.45 0.01 0.01 0.29 0.30 0.01 0.05 0.06 5.78 1,160 1,165 0.65 0.04 0.10 1,194 Fit 7 Lab Detailed Report, 1/31/2023
10 / 43
——————————————————Average
Daily
(Max)
Unmit. 0.56 0.67 0.42 4.25 0.01 0.01 0.29 0.30 0.01 0.05 0.06 5.78 1,172 1,178 0.65 0.04 1.48 1,209 Annual
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 0.10 0.12 0.08 0.78 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 0.06 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 0.96 194 195 0.11 0.01 0.25 200

2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Sector TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 0.44 0.40 0.33 3.74 0.01 0.01 0.29 0.30 0.01 0.05 0.06 — 860 860 0.04 0.03 3.40 874 Area 0.18 0.34 0.01 1.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 4.23 4.23 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 4.25 Energy 0.01 < 0.005 0.05 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 324 324 0.02 < 0.005 — 325 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 2.33 12.3 14.7 0.24 0.01 — 22.4 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 3.44 0.00 3.44 0.34 0.00 — 12.1 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.02 0.02
Total 0.63 0.74 0.39 4.80 0.01 0.01 0.29 0.30 0.01 0.05 0.06 5.78 1,200 1,206 0.65 0.04 3.41 1,238 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 0.43 0.39 0.36 3.41 0.01 0.01 0.29 0.30 0.01 0.05 0.06 — 823 823 0.04 0.04 0.09 835 Area — 0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Energy 0.01 < 0.005 0.05 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 324 324 0.02 < 0.005 — 325 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 2.33 12.3 14.7 0.24 0.01 — 22.4 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 3.44 0.00 3.44 0.34 0.00 — 12.1 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.02 0.02
Fit 7 Lab Detailed Report, 1/31/2023
11 / 43
Total 0.44 0.56 0.41 3.45 0.01 0.01 0.29 0.30 0.01 0.05 0.06 5.78 1,160 1,165 0.65 0.04 0.10 1,194 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 0.43 0.39 0.37 3.51 0.01 0.01 0.29 0.30 0.01 0.05 0.06 — 833 833 0.04 0.04 1.47 846 Area 0.13 0.28 0.01 0.70 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 2.90 2.90 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 2.91 Energy 0.01 < 0.005 0.05 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 324 324 0.02 < 0.005 — 325 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 2.33 12.3 14.7 0.24 0.01 — 22.4 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 3.44 0.00 3.44 0.34 0.00 — 12.1 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.02 0.02
Total 0.56 0.67 0.42 4.25 0.01 0.01 0.29 0.30 0.01 0.05 0.06 5.78 1,172 1,178 0.65 0.04 1.48 1,209 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 0.08 0.07 0.07 0.64 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 0.05 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 — 138 138 0.01 0.01 0.24 140 Area 0.02 0.05 < 0.005 0.13 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 0.48 0.48 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.48 Energy < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 53.7 53.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 53.8 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 0.39 2.04 2.43 0.04 < 0.005 — 3.71 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 0.57 0.00 0.57 0.06 0.00 — 2.00 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — < 0.005 < 0.005 Total 0.10 0.12 0.08 0.78 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 0.06 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 0.96 194 195 0.11 0.01 0.25 200

3. Construction Emissions Details

3.1. Demolition (2023) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Fit 7 Lab Detailed Report, 1/31/2023
12 / 43
Off-Road
Equipment

0.65 0.54 4.99 5.91 0.01 0.21 — 0.21 0.20 — 0.20 — 852 852 0.03 0.01 — 855 Demolitio
n
— — — — — — 0.31 0.31 — 0.05 0.05 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.02 0.01 0.14 0.16 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 23.3 23.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 23.4 Demolitio
n
— — — — — — 0.01 0.01 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 3.87 3.87 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 3.88 Demolitio
n
— — — — — — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — — — — — — — Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.82 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.13 0.00 0.03 0.03 — 144 144 0.01 < 0.005 0.61 147 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.03 0.01 0.54 0.20 < 0.005 0.01 0.11 0.12 0.01 0.03 0.03 — 415 415 0.02 0.07 0.94 437 Fit 7 Lab Detailed Report, 1/31/2023
13 / 43
——————————————————Daily,
Winter
(Max)
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 3.80 3.80 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 3.86 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 11.4 11.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 11.9 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.63 0.63 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.64 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.88 1.88 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.98

3.3. Grading (2023) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.52 1.28 12.6 11.4 0.02 0.60 — 0.60 0.55 — 0.55 — 1,713 1,713 0.07 0.01 — 1,719 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 2.07 2.07 — 1.00 1.00 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Fit 7 Lab Detailed Report, 1/31/2023
14 / 43
——————————————————Average
Daily
Off-Road
Equipment

0.09 0.08 0.76 0.69 < 0.005 0.04 — 0.04 0.03 — 0.03 — 103 103 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 104 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 0.12 0.12 — 0.06 0.06 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.02 0.01 0.14 0.13 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 17.1 17.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 17.2 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 0.02 0.02 — 0.01 0.01 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.61 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.10 0.00 0.02 0.02 — 108 108 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.46 110 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 6.28 6.28 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 6.36 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Fit 7 Lab Detailed Report, 1/31/2023
15 / 43
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.04 1.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.05 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.5. Building Construction (2023) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.69 0.58 5.93 7.00 0.01 0.28 — 0.28 0.26 — 0.26 — 1,305 1,305 0.05 0.01 — 1,309 Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.69 0.58 5.93 7.00 0.01 0.28 — 0.28 0.26 — 0.26 — 1,305 1,305 0.05 0.01 — 1,309 Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.23 0.19 1.94 2.29 < 0.005 0.09 — 0.09 0.09 — 0.09 — 426 426 0.02 < 0.005 — 428 Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Fit 7 Lab Detailed Report, 1/31/2023
16 / 43
Off-Road
Equipment

0.04 0.03 0.35 0.42 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 70.6 70.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 70.8 Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.05 0.04 0.05 0.76 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.12 0.00 0.03 0.03 — 134 134 0.01 < 0.005 0.57 136 Vendor 0.01 < 0.005 0.15 0.08 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.03 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 — 127 127 0.01 0.02 0.34 132 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.05 0.04 0.06 0.64 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.12 0.00 0.03 0.03 — 127 127 0.01 < 0.005 0.01 128 Vendor 0.01 < 0.005 0.16 0.08 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.03 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 — 127 127 0.01 0.02 0.01 132 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.22 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.04 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 42.0 42.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.08 42.5 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 0.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 41.5 41.5 < 0.005 0.01 0.05 43.2 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 6.95 6.95 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 7.04 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 6.87 6.87 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 7.16 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.7. Building Construction (2024) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Fit 7 Lab Detailed Report, 1/31/2023
17 / 43
Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.67 0.56 5.60 6.98 0.01 0.26 — 0.26 0.23 — 0.23 — 1,305 1,305 0.05 0.01 — 1,309 Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.67 0.56 5.60 6.98 0.01 0.26 — 0.26 0.23 — 0.23 — 1,305 1,305 0.05 0.01 — 1,309 Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.18 0.15 1.54 1.93 < 0.005 0.07 — 0.07 0.06 — 0.06 — 360 360 0.01 < 0.005 — 361 Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.03 0.03 0.28 0.35 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 59.6 59.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 59.8 Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.70 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.12 0.00 0.03 0.03 — 131 131 0.01 < 0.005 0.52 133 Vendor 0.01 < 0.005 0.15 0.07 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.03 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 — 125 125 0.01 0.02 0.34 131 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Fit 7 Lab Detailed Report, 1/31/2023
18 / 43
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.05 0.04 0.05 0.59 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.12 0.00 0.03 0.03 — 124 124 0.01 < 0.005 0.01 125 Vendor 0.01 < 0.005 0.15 0.07 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.03 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 — 125 125 0.01 0.02 0.01 130 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 34.7 34.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 35.1 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 34.5 34.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 36.0 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 5.74 5.74 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 5.82 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 5.71 5.71 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 5.96 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

4. Operations Emissions Details

4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use

4.1.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
City Park 0.44 0.40 0.33 3.74 0.01 0.01 0.29 0.30 0.01 0.05 0.06 — 860 860 0.04 0.03 3.40 874 Fit 7 Lab Detailed Report, 1/31/2023
19 / 43

0.000.000.000.000.000.00—0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00General Office
Building
Enclosed
Par
king
with
Elevator

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 0.44 0.40 0.33 3.74 0.01 0.01 0.29 0.30 0.01 0.05 0.06 — 860 860 0.04 0.03 3.40 874 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
City Park 0.43 0.39 0.36 3.41 0.01 0.01 0.29 0.30 0.01 0.05 0.06 — 823 823 0.04 0.04 0.09 835 General
Office
Building

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Enclosed
Par
king
with
Elevator

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 0.43 0.39 0.36 3.41 0.01 0.01 0.29 0.30 0.01 0.05 0.06 — 823 823 0.04 0.04 0.09 835 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
City Park 0.08 0.07 0.07 0.64 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 0.05 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 — 138 138 0.01 0.01 0.24 140 General
Office
Building

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Enclosed
Par
king
with
Elevator

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 0.08 0.07 0.07 0.64 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 0.05 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 — 138 138 0.01 0.01 0.24 140

4.2. Energy

4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated
Fit 7 Lab Detailed Report, 1/31/2023
20 / 43
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
City Park — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 General
Office
Building
— — — — — — — — — — — — 178 178 0.01 < 0.005 — 179
Enclosed
Par
king
with
Elevator
— — — — — — — — — — — — 90.4 90.4 0.01 < 0.005 — 90.7
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 268 268 0.02 < 0.005 — 269 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
City Park — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 General
Office
Building
— — — — — — — — — — — — 178 178 0.01 < 0.005 — 179
Enclosed
Par
king
with
Elevator
— — — — — — — — — — — — 90.4 90.4 0.01 < 0.005 — 90.7
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 268 268 0.02 < 0.005 — 269 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
City Park — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 General
Office
Building
— — — — — — — — — — — — 29.5 29.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 29.6 Fit 7 Lab Detailed Report, 1/31/2023
21 / 43

15.0—< 0.005< 0.00515.015.0————————————Enclosed
Par
king
with
Elevator
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 44.4 44.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 44.6

4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
City Park 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 General
Office
Building

0.01 < 0.005 0.05 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 55.7 55.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 55.8 Enclosed
Par
king
with
Elevator

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Total 0.01 < 0.005 0.05 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 55.7 55.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 55.8 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
City Park 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 General
Office
Building

0.01 < 0.005 0.05 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 55.7 55.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 55.8 Enclosed
Par
king
with
Elevator

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Total 0.01 < 0.005 0.05 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 55.7 55.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 55.8 Fit 7 Lab Detailed Report, 1/31/2023
22 / 43
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
City Park 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 General
Office
Building
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 9.22 9.22 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 9.24 Enclosed
Par
king
with
Elevator

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Total < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 9.22 9.22 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 9.24

4.3. Area Emissions by Source

4.3.2. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Source TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Consum
er
Products
— 0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Architect
ural
Coatings
— 0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Landsca
pe
Equipme
nt

0.18 0.17 0.01 1.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 4.23 4.23 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 4.25 Total 0.18 0.34 0.01 1.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 4.23 4.23 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 4.25 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Fit 7 Lab Detailed Report, 1/31/2023
23 / 43
Consum
Products
— 0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Architect
ural
Coatings
— 0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — 0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Consum
er
Products
— 0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Architect
ural
Coatings
— <

0.005 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Landsca
pe
Equipme
nt

0.02 0.02 < 0.005 0.13 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 0.48 0.48 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.48 Total 0.02 0.05 < 0.005 0.13 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 0.48 0.48 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.48

4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use

4.4.2. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
City Park — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.24 0.24 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.24 General
Office
Building
— — — — — — — — — — — 2.33 12.1 14.4 0.24 0.01 — 22.1
Fit 7 Lab Detailed Report, 1/31/2023
24 / 43

0.00—0.000.000.000.000.00———————————Enclosed
Parking
with
Elev
ator
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 2.33 12.3 14.7 0.24 0.01 — 22.4 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
City Park — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.24 0.24 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.24 General
Office
Building
— — — — — — — — — — — 2.33 12.1 14.4 0.24 0.01 — 22.1
Enclosed
Par
king
with
Elevator
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 2.33 12.3 14.7 0.24 0.01 — 22.4 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
City Park — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.04 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.04 General
Office
Building
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.39 2.00 2.39 0.04 < 0.005 — 3.67 Enclosed
Par
king
with
Elevator
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 0.39 2.04 2.43 0.04 < 0.005 — 3.71

4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use

4.5.2. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Fit 7 Lab Detailed Report, 1/31/2023
25 / 43
CO2eRN2OCH4CO2TNBCO2BCO2PM2.5TPM2.5DPM2.5EPM10TPM10DPM10ESO2CONOxROGTOGLand Use
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
City Park — — — — — — — — — — — 0.01 0.00 0.01 < 0.005 0.00 — 0.03 General
Office
Building
— — — — — — — — — — — 3.44 0.00 3.44 0.34 0.00 — 12.0
Enclosed
Par
king
with
Elevator
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 3.44 0.00 3.44 0.34 0.00 — 12.1 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
City Park — — — — — — — — — — — 0.01 0.00 0.01 < 0.005 0.00 — 0.03 General
Office
Building
— — — — — — — — — — — 3.44 0.00 3.44 0.34 0.00 — 12.0
Enclosed
Par
king
with
Elevator
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 3.44 0.00 3.44 0.34 0.00 — 12.1 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
City Park — — — — — — — — — — — < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 — 0.01 General
Office
Building
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.57 0.00 0.57 0.06 0.00 — 1.99
Enclosed
Par
king
with
Elevator
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Fit 7 Lab Detailed Report, 1/31/2023
26 / 43
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 0.57 0.00 0.57 0.06 0.00 — 2.00

4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use

4.6.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
City Park — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00
General
Office
Building
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.02 0.02
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.02 0.02
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
City Park — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00
General
Office
Building
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.02 0.02
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.02 0.02
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
City Park — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00
General
Office
Building
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — < 0.005 < 0.005
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — < 0.005 < 0.005
Fit 7 Lab Detailed Report, 1/31/2023
27 / 43

4.7. Offroad Emissions By Equipment Type

4.7.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipme
nt
Type
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment Type

4.8.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipme
nt
Type
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Fit 7 Lab Detailed Report, 1/31/2023
28 / 43
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type

4.9.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipme
nt
Type
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type

4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Vegetatio
n
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Fit 7 Lab Detailed Report, 1/31/2023
29 / 43
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Species TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Fit 7 Lab Detailed Report, 1/31/2023
30 / 43
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequest
ered
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Remove
d
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequest
ered
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Remove
d
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequest
ered
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Remove
d
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Fit 7 Lab Detailed Report, 1/31/2023
31 / 43

5. Activity Data

5.1. Construction Schedule
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Days Per Week Work Days per Phase Phase Description Demolition Demolition 6/1/2023 6/15/2023 5.00 10.0 —
Grading Grading 6/16/2023 7/17/2023 5.00 22.0 —
Building Construction Building Construction 7/18/2023 5/20/2024 5.00 220 —

5.2. Off-Road Equipment

5.2.1. Unmitigated
Phase Name Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial
Saws
Diesel A verage 1.00 8.00 33.0 0.73
Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Average 1.00 1.00 367 0.40 Demolition Tractors/Loaders/Backh
oes
Diesel Average 2.00 6.00 84.0 0.37
Grading Graders Diesel Average 1.00 6.00 148 0.41
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Average 1.00 6.00 367 0.40 Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backh
oes
Diesel Average 1.00 7.00 84.0 0.37
Building Construction Cranes Diesel Average 1.00 4.00 367 0.29 Building Construction Forklifts Diesel Average 2.00 6.00 82.0 0.20 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backh
oes
Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 84.0 0.37

5.3. Construction Vehicles
Fit 7 Lab Detailed Report, 1/31/2023
32 / 43

5.3.1. Unmitigated
Phase Name Trip Type One-Way Trips per Day Miles per Trip Vehicle Mix Demolition — — — —
Demolition Worker 10.0 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Demolition Vendor — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Demolition Hauling 5.80 20.0 HHDT
Demolition Onsite truck — — HHDT
Grading — — — —
Grading Worker 7.50 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Grading Vendor — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Grading Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Grading Onsite truck — — HHDT
Building Construction — — — —
Building Construction Worker 9.25 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Building Construction Vendor 3.88 10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Building Construction Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Building Construction Onsite truck — — HHDT

5.4. Vehicles

5.4.1. Construction Vehicle Control Strategies
Non-applicable. No control strategies activated by user.

5.5. Architectural Coatings
Phase Name Residential Interior Area Coated
(sq ft)
Residential Exterior Area Coated
(sq ft)
Non-Residential Interior Area
Coated (sq
ft)
Non-Residential Exterior Area
Coated (sq
ft)
Parking Area Coated (sq ft)
Fit 7 Lab Detailed Report, 1/31/2023
33 / 43

5.6. Dust Mitigation

5.6.1. Construction Earthmoving Activities
Phase Name Material Imported (Ton of
Debris)
Material Exported (Ton of
Debris)
Acres Graded (acres) Material Demolished (Building
Square F
ootage)
Acres Paved (acres)
Demolition 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,000 —
Grading 0.00 0.00 16.5 0.00 —

5.6.2. Construction Earthmoving Control Strategies
Control Strategies Applied Frequency (per day) PM10 Reduction PM2.5 Reduction Water Exposed Area 2 61% 61%
Water Demolished Area 2 36% 36%

5.7. Construction Paving
Land Use Area Paved (acres) % Asphalt
City Park 0.00 0%
General Office Building 0.00 0%
Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.30 100%

5.8. Construction Electricity Consumption and Emissions Factors kWh per Y ear and Emission Factor (lb/MWh)
Y ear kWh per Y ear CO2 CH4 N2O
2023 0.00 532 0.03 < 0.005
2024 0.00 532 0.03 < 0.005

5.9. Operational Mobile Sources
Fit 7 Lab Detailed Report, 1/31/2023
34 / 43

5.9.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Type Trips/Weekday Trips/Saturday Trips/Sunday Trips/Y ear VMT/Weekday VMT/Saturday VMT/Sunday VMT/Y ear City Park 107 107 107 39,055 1,051 1,051 1,051 383,762
General Office
Building

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Enclosed Parking
with Ele
vator

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

5.10. Operational Area Sources

5.10.1. Hearths

5.10.1.1. Unmitigated

5.10.2. Architectural Coatings
Residential Interior Area Coated (sq ft) Residential Exterior Area Coated (sq ft) Non-Residential Interior Area Coated (sq ft)
Non-Residential Exterior Area Coated
(sq ft)
Parking Area Coated (sq ft)
0 0.00 10,869 3,492 784

5.10.3. Landscape Equipment
Season Unit Value
Snow Days day/yr 0.00
Summer Days day/yr 250

5.11. Operational Energy Consumption

5.11.1. Unmitigated
Electricity (kWh/yr) and CO2 and CH4 and N2O and Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Fit 7 Lab Detailed Report, 1/31/2023
35 / 43
Land Use Electricity (kWh/yr) CO2 CH4 N2O Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) City Park 0.00 532 0.0330 0.0040 0.00
General Office Building 122,140 532 0.0330 0.0040 173,725 Enclosed Parking with Elevator 62,016 532 0.0330 0.0040 0.00

5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption

5.12.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Indoor Water (gal/year) Outdoor Water (gal/year) City Park 0.00 31,166
General Office Building 1,218,187 0.00
Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.00 0.00

5.13. Operational Waste Generation

5.13.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Waste (ton/year) Cogeneration (kWh/year)
City Park 0.02 0.00
General Office Building 6.37 0.00
Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.00 0.00

5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment

5.14.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Type Equipment Type Refrigerant GWP Quantity (kg) Operations Leak Rate Service Leak Rate Times Serviced City Park Other commercial A/C
and heat
pumps
R-410A 2,088 < 0.005 4.00 4.00 18.0
Fit 7 Lab Detailed Report, 1/31/2023
36 / 43
City Park Stand-alone retail
refriger
ators and
freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.04 1.00 0.00 1.00
General Office Building Household refrigerators
and/or freez
ers
R-134a 1,430 0.02 0.60 0.00 1.00
General Office Building Other commercial A/C
and heat
pumps
R-410A 2,088 < 0.005 4.00 4.00 18.0

5.15. Operational Off-Road Equipment

5.15.1. Unmitigated
Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load Factor

5.16. Stationary Sources

5.16.1. Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps
Equipment Type Fuel Type Number per Day Hours per Day Hours per Y ear Horsepower Load Factor

5.16.2. Process Boilers
Equipment Type Fuel Type Number Boiler Rating (MMBtu/hr) Daily Heat Input (MMBtu/day) Annual Heat Input (MMBtu/yr)

5.17. User Defined
Equipment Type Fuel Type
— —

5.18. Vegetation

5.18.1. Land Use Change
Fit 7 Lab Detailed Report, 1/31/2023
37 / 43

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
Vegetation Land Use Type Vegetation Soil Type Initial Acres Final Acres

5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
Biomass Cover Type Initial Acres Final Acres

5.18.2. Sequestration

5.18.2.1. Unmitigated
Tree Type Number Electricity Saved (kWh/year) Natural Gas Saved (btu/year)

6. Climate Risk Detailed Report

6.1. Climate Risk Summary
Cal-Adapt midcentury 2040–2059 average projections for four hazards are reported below for your project location. These are under Representation Concentration Pathway (RCP) 8.5 which assumes GHG emissions will
continue to rise strongly through 2050 and then plateau around 2100.

Climate Hazard Result for Project Location Unit
Temperature and Extreme Heat 22.5 annual days of extreme heat Extreme Precipitation 6.00 annual days with precipitation above 20 mm Sea Level Rise 0.00 meters of inundation depth
Wildfire 0.00 annual hectares burned
Temperature and Extreme Heat data are for grid cell in which your project are located. The projection is based on the 98th historical percentile of daily maximum/minimum temperatures from observed historical
data (32 climate model ensemble from Cal-Adapt, 2040–2059 average under RCP 8.5). Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi.

Extreme Precipitation data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The threshold of 20 mm is equivalent to about ¾ an inch of rain, which would be light to moderate rainfall if received over a full day
or heavy rain if received over a period of 2 to 4 hours. Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi.

Fit 7 Lab Detailed Report, 1/31/2023
38 / 43
Sea Level Rise data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The projections are from Radke et al. (2017), as reported in Cal-Adapt (2040–2059 average under RCP 8.5), and consider different increments of sea level rise coupled with extreme storm events. Users may select from four model simulations to view the range in potential inundation depth for the grid cell. The four simulations make different
assumptions about expected rainfall and temperature are: Warmer/drier (HadGEM2-ES), Cooler/wetter (CNRM-CM5), Average conditions (CanESM2), Range of different rainfall and temperature possibilities (MIROC5). Each grid cell is 50 meters (m) by 50 m, or about 164 feet (ft) by 164 ft.

Wildfire data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The projections are from UC Davis, as reported in Cal-Adapt (2040–2059 average under RCP 8.5), and consider historical data of climate, vegetation,
population density, and large (> 400 ha) fire history. Users may select from four model simulations to view the range in potential wildfire probabilities for the grid cell. The four simulations make different assumptions about expected rainfall and temperature are: Warmer/drier (HadGEM2-ES), Cooler/wetter (CNRM-CM5), Average conditions (CanESM2), Range of different rainfall and temperature possibilities (MIROC5). Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi.

6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores
Climate Hazard Exposure Score Sensitivity Score Adaptive Capacity Score Vulnerability Score Temperature and Extreme Heat 2 0 0 N/A
Extreme Precipitation N/A N/A N/A N/A
Sea Level Rise 1 0 0 N/A
Wildfire 1 0 0 N/A
Flooding N/A N/A N/A N/A
Drought N/A N/A N/A N/A
Snowpack Reduction N/A N/A N/A N/A
Air Quality Degradation 0 0 0 N/A
The sensitivity score reflects the extent to which a project would be adversely affected by exposure to a climate hazard. Exposure is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest exposure
.

The adaptive capacity of a project refers to its ability to manage and reduce vulnerabilities from projected climate hazards. Adaptive capacity is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest
ability to adapt.

The overall vulnerability scores are calculated based on the potential impacts and adaptive capacity assessments for each hazard. Scores do not include implementation of climate risk reduction measures.

6.3. Adjusted Climate Risk Scores
Climate Hazard Exposure Score Sensitivity Score Adaptive Capacity Score Vulnerability Score Temperature and Extreme Heat 2 1 1 3
Extreme Precipitation N/A N/A N/A N/A
Sea Level Rise 1 1 1 2
Wildfire 1 1 1 2
Flooding N/A N/A N/A N/A
Fit 7 Lab Detailed Report, 1/31/2023
39 / 43
Drought N/A N/A N/A N/A
Snowpack Reduction N/A N/A N/A N/A
Air Quality Degradation 1 1 1 2
The sensitivity score reflects the extent to which a project would be adversely affected by exposure to a climate hazard. Exposure is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest exposure
.

The adaptive capacity of a project refers to its ability to manage and reduce vulnerabilities from projected climate hazards. Adaptive capacity is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest
ability to adapt.

The overall vulnerability scores are calculated based on the potential impacts and adaptive capacity assessments for each hazard. Scores include implementation of climate risk reduction measures.

6.4. Climate Risk Reduction Measures

7. Health and Equity Details

7.1. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Scores
The maximum CalEnviroScreen score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects a higher pollution burden compared to other census tracts in the state.

Indicator Result for Project Census Tract
Exposure Indicators —
AQ-Ozone 82.5
AQ-PM 70.8
AQ-DPM 29.7
Drinking Water 84.9
Lead Risk Housing 90.1
Pesticides 10.9
Toxic Releases 76.3
Traffic 25.1
Effect Indicators —
CleanUp Sites 73.4
Groundwater 75.7
Haz Waste Facilities/Generators 27.1
Fit 7 Lab Detailed Report, 1/31/2023
40 / 43
Impaired Water Bodies 23.9
Solid Waste 89.3
Sensitive Population —
Asthma 76.1
Cardio-vascular 65.1
Low Birth Weights 68.9
Socioeconomic Factor Indicators —
Education 84.2
Housing 51.8
Linguistic 81.2
Poverty 57.6
Unemployment 53.9

7.2. Healthy Places Index Scores
The maximum Health Places Index score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects healthier community conditions compared to other census tracts in the state.

Indicator Result for Project Census Tract
Economic —
Above Poverty 37.93147697
Employed 58.03926601
Median HI 42.82047992
Education —
Bachelor's or higher 4.606698319
High school enrollment 100
Preschool enrollment 49.04401386
Transportation —
Auto Access 82.44578468
Active commuting 46.41344797
Fit 7 Lab Detailed Report, 1/31/2023
41 / 43
Social —
2-parent households 36.2504812
Voting 0.949570127
Neighborhood —
Alcohol availability 40.92133966
Park access 81.35506224
Retail density 55.85782112
Supermarket access 2.399589375
Tree canopy 19.97946875
Housing —
Homeownership 81.12408572
Housing habitability 34.08186834
Low-inc homeowner severe housing cost burden 19.31220326 Low-inc renter severe housing cost burden 46.40061594
Uncrowded housing 11.35634544
Health Outcomes —
Insured adults 19.196715
Arthritis 80.8
Asthma ER Admissions 28.4
High Blood Pressure 81.4
Cancer (excluding skin) 80.0
Asthma 69.3
Coronary Heart Disease 57.7
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease 76.7
Diagnosed Diabetes 26.4
Life Expectancy at Birth 33.1
Cognitively Disabled 35.0
Fit 7 Lab Detailed Report, 1/31/2023
42 / 43
Physically Disabled 65.4
Heart Attack ER Admissions 21.0
Mental Health Not Good 39.0
Chronic Kidney Disease 35.4
Obesity 32.0
Pedestrian Injuries 19.6
Physical Health Not Good 33.1
Stroke 64.5
Health Risk Behaviors —
Binge Drinking 36.9
Current Smoker 51.2
No Leisure Time for Physical Activity 32.2
Climate Change Exposures —
Wildfire Risk 0.0
SLR Inundation Area 0.0
Children 61.0
Elderly 66.3
English Speaking 25.0
Foreign-born 81.5
Outdoor Workers 37.5
Climate Change Adaptive Capacity —
Impervious Surface Cover 26.8
Traffic Density 27.5
Traffic Access 23.0
Other Indices —
Hardship 75.6
Other Decision Support —
Fit 7 Lab Detailed Report, 1/31/2023
43 / 43
2016 Voting 25.7

7.3. Overall Health & Equity Scores
Metric Result for Project Census Tract
CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Score for Project Location (a) 88.0 Healthy Places Index Score for Project Location (b) 30.0 Project Located in a Designated Disadvantaged Community (Senate Bill 535) Y es Project Located in a Low-Income Community (Assembly Bill 1550) Y es Project Located in a Community Air Protection Program Community (Assembly Bill 617) No a: The maximum CalEnviroScreen score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects a higher pollution burden compared to other census tracts in the state. b: The maximum Health Places Index score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects healthier community conditions compared to other census tracts in the state.

7.4. Health & Equity Measures
No Health & Equity Measures selected.

7.5. Evaluation Scorecard
Health & Equity Evaluation Scorecard not completed.

7.6. Health & Equity Custom Measures
No Health & Equity Custom Measures created.

8. User Changes to Default Data
Screen Justification
Construction: Construction Phases Construction schedule per applicant Operations: Vehicle Data Per trip generation calculated in initial study Land Use Project Site is approximately 0.6 acres. Office building selected to account for sf associated with the indoor soccer
field, gym, office spaces, meeting space, kitchen and bathrooms.

APPENDIX B
Noise Impact Analysis
811 W. 7th Street, Suite 200
Los Angeles, CA 90017
(213) 935-1901
www.impactsciences.com

PROJECTS THROUGHOUT CALIFORNIA

MEMORANDUM

To: Melanie Chipres, Associate Planner, City of Baldwin Park Job No. 1489.001 From: Brett Pomeroy, Associate Principal, Impact Sciences Subject: Noise Impact Analysis for the Fit 7 Sports Lab Development Project Date: October 14, 2024

1. INTRODUCTION
This Noise and Vibration Memorandum evaluates noise and vibration impacts associated with the proposed Fit 7 Sports Lab Development Project (the “Project”) in the City of Baldwin Park (City). This memorandum has been prepared by Impact Sciences, Inc., to support the Project’s environmental documentation being prepared pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). This analysis considers both the temporary noise impacts from Project construction and long-term impacts associated with operation of the Project.

Project Location
The proposed Fit 7 Sports Lab Development Project (Project) would involve improvements to two adjacent lots located at 14412 Joanbridge Street (Assessment Parcel Number [APN] 8414-023-011) and 14424 Joanbridge Street (APN 8414- 023-010) in the City of Baldwin Park (City). The Project would merge the two adjacent lots as one property (Project Site).

The Project Site is located within the northern perimeter of Baldwin Park’s jurisdiction limits, located approximately 1.30 miles east of Interstate 605 (I-605) and 1.96 miles south of Interstate 210 (I-210) (see Figure 1, Regional Location). The Project Site is primarily accessible by East Joanbridge Street, located north of the Project Site.

The Project Site is developed and located within a heavily urbanized area of the City. According to the City of Baldwin Park General Plan (dated 2020), the Project Site is currently designated for General Industrial land uses. Concurrently, the Project Site is zoned Industrial by the City of Baldwin Park Zoning Map.

Project Description
The Project would merge the properties located at 14412 and 14424 Joanbridge Street into one property totaling approximately 26,244 square feet. The Project would repurpose the 14412 Joanbridge Street building into an indoor soccer training facility with a bathroom and gym downstairs and a mezzanine upstairs. The Project would also demolish the 14424 Joanbridge Street building and construct ground floor parking with uncovered rooftop soccer fields. Hours of operation would occur between the hours of 4:00 P. M. and 10:00 P.M. on weekdays, 9:00 A.M. and 6:00 P.M. on Saturdays, and 8:00 A.M. to 2:00 P.M. on Sundays.

As a soccer training facility, no whistles, buzzers, or horns will be used to regulate activities and no amplified music or public address systems will be operated. The primary soccer activities would include training young kids (ages 5-13) in small groups and would consist of practice, skill-related drills, endurance training, and soccer fundamentals.

¯
0 100 20050 Miles
Esri, NASA, NGA, USGS, County of Los Angeles, California State Parks, Esri, HERE, Garmin, SafeGraph, METI/NASA, USGS, Bureau of Land Management, EPA, NPS, USDA City of Baldwin Park
Project Site
Regional Location Map
FIGURE 1
1489.001•01/23
SOURCE: Esri, 2023

Impact Sciences, Inc. 3 Fit 7 Sports Lab Development Project Noise Memorandum 1489.001 October 2024
Ground Floor
The Project would repurpose the existing building and demolish the existing trash enclosure at 14412 Joanbridge Street into a two-story soccer training facility. The first floor of the facility would include a meeting room, a gymnasium room, ADA-compliant restrooms, and a 6,625 square foot indoor soccer field equipped with two nets and one bench, and one water fountain (see Figure 2, Conceptual Site Plan-Floor 1). The property’s existing driveway would serve as the main exit for vehicles from the Project Site. A 2,446 square foot driving lane would be provided for visiting vehicles as an egress route and utilized as an emergency fire truck lane for the Los Angeles County Fire Department (LACFD). Additionally, approximately seven ground-level parking spaces would be provided within this property.

The Project would demolish the existing 5,000 square foot building at 14424 Joanbridge Street and construct ground floor parking with rooftop soccer fields. As shown in Figure 2 , the Project would provide approximately 3 9 ground- level parking spaces including two ADA-compliant parking spaces within this property. Parking would be covered with a cement slab supported by columns and beams. The Project would utilize the property’s existing driveway as the main vehicular entrance to the Project Site, and a one- way driving lane would be included to guide vehicular circulation.

Additionally, an outdoor trash enclosure would be provided within this property.

Second Floor
At 14412 Joanbridge Street, the second -floor level would include the mezzanine consisting of four office spaces, a kitchen, and a restroom (see Figure 3, Conceptual Site Plan-Floor 2).

On the southern side of the second-floor level, the Project would also include a 2,314 square foot soccer field, equipped with two soccer nets, one bench, and a fountain. The soccer field would be directly above the first-floor parking area.

Nets would be installed to divide soccer field locations and shield visitors from any soccer balls that leave the soccer field. Access to the second floor of the proposed facility would be provided via stairs, and access to the proposed outdoor soccer field would be provided via an elevator and stairs.

At 14424 Joanbridge Street, the second-floor level includes three outdoor soccer fields (that total approximately 10,618 square feet) above the proposed ground- level parking. As shown in Figure 3 , each soccer field would be equipped with two soccer nets and benches. Nets would be installed between each soccer field to shield facility users from any soccer balls that leave the soccer field. Access to the second level would be provided via staircase s and the proposed elevator located on the 14412 Joanbridge Street property.

2. REGULATORY SETTING
Title 24, California Code of Regulations
The California Noise Insulation Standards of 1988 (California Code of Regulations Title 24, Section 3501 et seq.) require that interior noise levels from the exterior sources not exceed 45 dBA Ldn/community noise equivalent level (CNEL) in any habitable room of a multi- residential use facility (e.g., hotels, motels, dormitories, long -term care facilities, and apartment houses and other dwellings, except detached single -family dwellings) with doors and windows closed.

Where exterior noise levels exceed 60 dB A CNEL/Ldn, an acoustical analysis is required to show that the building construction achieves an interior noise level of 45 dBA CNEL/Ldn or less.

PL PL
PLPL
PL
PL
PL
PL
PL
175'-0"
PL
93'-2"
53'-5"

MEN WOMEN

MEETING
ROOM
GYM
ROOM
4'-0"12'-4"
15'-0"
4'-0"18'-0"
28'-7"
5'-0"
9'-4" 10'-6" 7'-11"93'-2"
124'-3"
40'-6"5'-0"
42'-9"
4'-0"
4'-0"
4'-0"
4'-0"
7'-2"

EXISTING BUILDING
55'-9"
8'-1"

EXISTING

ROLL UP
DOOR
PL PL

FIRE TRUCK PATH
26' BY 99'-4"
END OF

FIRE TRUCK
26'-0"
01 02
03 04
05 13
14 15
16 38
21 22
27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35
32'-6"
3'-0"
24'-0"
24'-0"
26'-0"
3'-3"
24'-0"
ADA
9'-0"5'-0"
18'-0"26
14412 JOANBRIDGE St.

INPATH OF TRAVEL

PATH OF TRAVEL OUT
8'-6"
18'-0"
8'-2"
12'-11"
10'-6"
11'-8"
9'-4"
5'-0"
18'-0"
24'-0"
18'-0"
14424 JOANBRIDGE St.
75'-0"
FIRE
HOSE
PATH
75'-0"75'-0"
150' MAX. TO

FIRE TRUCK
75'+75'=150'
150' MAX. TO

FIRE TRUCK
75'+75'=150'
SOCCER COURT 1
8'-6"
75'-0"75'-0"
11 3
3 2
2 12'-0"15'-2"
75'-0"75'-0"
150'-0"
39 8'-6"
18'-0"
06 07
08 19 20
09 10
11 12
36 37
ADA
9'-0"
18'-0"
7 Parking Spaces
32 Parking Spaces25

ELEVATOR
3'-0"
8'-6"
5'-0"
3'-0"

DECK EDGE ABOVE
M.RRW.RR
HALL
12'-6"
4'-0"7'-1"12'-6"
11'-6"
17 18
6'-0"
16'-0"
5'-0"
23 24
5'-0"
44 Lot Size: 13,122 sq.ft.
14412 + 14424 JOANBRIDGE St.

Parking = 39 Spaces
Lot Size: 13,122 sq.ft.
25'-3"
26'-6"
5'-0"5'-0" to PL

1. VENDING MACHINE

EPEX BEVERAGE
COMBO 32d x 35w x 77 h
1 TRASH ENCLOSURE
Trinidad Campbell
Design & Building
3829 Ronda Vista Pl. Los Angeles, CA. 90027
(323)497-9969
[email protected]
Project Number
Date
Drawn By
Scale
FIT 7 LAB
14412 & 14424 JOANBRIDGE St.

BALDWIN PARK
LOS ANGELES, CA 91706
Architect
Alejandro Resendiz
52 Carrige Way. Pomona, CA. 91766
(909)456-4506
[email protected]
MAY 25/2023
A-1.1
GLRS
2210 BAL

FIRST FLOOR
PLAN
1/8" = 1'-0" 1/8" = 1'-0"1 GROUND FLOOR PLAN
N
12/19/2022
Conceptual Site Plan - Floor 1
FIGURE 2
1489.001•10/23
SOURCE: Trinidad Campbell, 2022

175'-0"
175'-0"
75'-0"
75'-0"
PL
PLPL
75'-0"
PL PL
PL
7'-6"
8'-4"7'-7"
7'-6"
6'-0"
3'-6" 7'-11"30'-93
4"
13'-4"
13'-2"
10'-83
4"
11'-6"
10'-83
4" 22'-103
4"
10'-33
4"
10'-33
4"
OFFICE 3 OFFICE 4
OFFICE 1 OFFICE 2

RR KITCHEN
PL PL
3'-0"
4'-0"
3'-0"
3'-0"
53'-7"
31'-73
4"
4'-0" 4'-0"
8'-0"
6'-0"48'-7" 48'-7" 6'-0" 48'-7"
55'-10"4'-0"
26'-8"
5'-0"
SOCCER FIELD 2
SOCCER FIELD 3 SOCCER FIELD 4 SOCCER FIELD 5
NET
NET
NET
31'-7"
26'-0"
53'-5"
94'-1"
55'-10" 4'-0"
4'-0"
150'-0"
75'-0"
14412 JOANBRIDGE St.

LOT SIZE = 13,222 sq.ft
14424 JOANBRIDGE St.

LOT SIZE = 13,222 sq.ft
UPPER FLOOR +12'-6" @ +12'6"
4 SOCCER FIELDS
WITH NET ABOVE @ +25'
11 3
3 2
2 4'-0"
3'-0"
28'-7"
54'-10"
55'-10"4'-0"
4'-0"
55'-73
4"
46'-101
2"15'-0"47'-11"
14'-8"
1 2 Diagonal =
Steps to be no more than
93'-4" separate

ELEVATOR
8'-6"
3'-0" 10'-0" 52'-0"
5'-0"
108'-7"
218'-2" 44
TOTAL 1st floor plan = 6,625 sq ft
TOTAL MEZZANINE = 1,650 sq ft
2,314 sq ft
1,586 sq ft
3,410 sq ft 3,438 sq ft 3,770 sq ft
6,625 sq ft

TOTAL CONCRETE UPPER
SLAB ON 14412; 14424=
14,518 sq.ft.
5'-0"

MEETING
ROOM
5'-0" to PL
5'-0" to PL
Trinidad Campbell
Design & Building
3829 Ronda Vista Pl. Los Angeles, CA. 90027
(323)497-9969
[email protected]
Project Number
Date
Drawn By
Scale
FIT 7 LAB
14412 & 14424 JOANBRIDGE St.

BALDWIN PARK
LOS ANGELES, CA 91706
Architect
Alejandro Resendiz
52 Carrige Way. Pomona, CA. 91766
(909)456-4506
[email protected]
MAY 25/2023
A-1.2
GLRS
2210 BAL

SECOND FLOOR
PLAN
1/8" = 1'-0"
N
1/8" = 1'-0"1 SECOND FLOOR PLAN
N
12/19/2022
Conceptual Site Plan - Floor 2
FIGURE 3
1489.001•10/23
SOURCE: Trinidad Campbell, 2022

Impact Sciences, Inc. 6 Fit 7 Sports Lab Development Project Noise Memorandum 1489.001 October 2024
City of Baldwin Park General Plan Noise Element
The Noise Element of the General Plan is a comprehensive program for including noise management in the planning process, providing a tool for planners to use in achieving and maintaining land uses that are compatible with existing and future environmental noise levels. The Noise Element follows guidelines in the State Government Code Section 65301 (f) and Section 46050.1 of the Health and Safety Code. It quantifies the community noise environment by establishing noise exposure contours for both near-and long-term levels of growth and noise-generating activity. This information guides development of goals and policies to achieve noise compatible land uses and identifies baseline noise levels and sources to help local noise ordinance enforcement. 1 As development proposals are reviewed in the future, the City and County will evaluate each proposal with respect to the Noise Element to ensure that noise impacts are reduced through planning and project design. Through implementation of the policies and programs of the Noise Element, current and future adverse noise impacts will be reduced or avoided to protect the general health, safety, and welfare of the community.

The most basic planning strategy to minimize adverse impacts on new land uses due to noise is to avoid designating sensitive land uses in areas that are subject to high levels of noise. Uses such as schools, hospitals, childcare, senior care, congregate care, churches, and all types of residential use should be located outside of any area anticipated to exceed acceptable noise levels as defined by the Noise and Land Use Compatibility Guidelines or should be protected from noise through sound attenuation measures such as site and architectural design and sound walls. Noise and land use incompatibilities can be avoided for new developments when noise is properly considered in the planning, design, and permitting of a project. The City aims to prevent future land use/ noise conflicts through the planning and approval process. Interior and exterior noise standards presented in the General Plan can be found in Table 1, City of Baldwin Park Interior and Exterior Noise Standards
Applicable goals and policies from the General Plan Noise Element are listed below.

Goal 1.0 Incorporate noise considerations into land use planning decisions.

Policy 1.1 Use the noise/land use compatibility standards as a guide for future planning and development decisions.

Policy 1.2 Require noise-reduction techniques in site planning, architectural design, and construction where noise reduction is necessary. Provide noise control measures such as berms, walls, and sound attenuating construction in areas of new construction.

Policy 1.3 Promote acceptable noise levels near schools, hospitals, convalescent homes, and other noise-sensitive areas.

Policy 1.4 Establish targeted limits of noise for various land uses throughout the community.

Goal 2.0 Minimize noise spillover from commercial and industrial uses into nearby residential neighborhoods.

Policy 2.1 Enforce the 65db(A) State standard for exterior noise levels for all commercial uses.

Policy 2.2 Require that automobile and truck access to commercial properties located adjacent to residential parcels be located at the maximum practical distance from the residential parcel.

1 City of Baldwin Park, General Plan Noise Element, 2020. Available online at:
https://www.baldwinpark.com/docssidemenu/community-dev elopment/planning/general-plan-individual-elements/1945- noise/file, accessed October 30, 2023.

Impact Sciences, Inc. 7 Fit 7 Sports Lab Development Project Noise Memorandum 1489.001 October 2024
Policy 2.3 Require that landscaped buffers be created between a commercial or mixed -use structure and an adjoining residential parcel.

Interior and exterior noise standards presented in the General Plan can be found in Table 1, City of Baldwin Park Interior and Exterior Noise Standards

Table 1
City of Baldwin Park Interior and Exterior Noise Standards

Land Use Noise Standards1
Interior2,3 Exterior
Residential – Single family, multifamily,
duplex, mobile home CNEL 45 dB CNEL 65 dB4
Residential – Transient lodging, hotels,
motels nursing homes, hospitals CNEL 45 dB CNEL 65 dB4
Private offices, church sanctuaries, libraries,
board rooms, conference rooms, theaters,
auditoriums, concert halls, meeting halls, etc.

Leq (12) 45 dB(A) -
Schools Leq (12) 45 dB(A) Leq (12) 67 dB(A)5
General offices, reception, clerical, etc. Leq (12) 50 dB(A) - Bank, lobby, retail store, restaurant. Typing
pool, etc. Leq (12) 55 dB(A) -
Manufacturing, kitchen, warehousing etc. Leq (12) 65 dB(A) - Parks, playgrounds - CNEL 65 dB5
Golf courses, outdoor spectator sports,
amusement parks - CNEL 70 dB5

Note:

1. CNEL: Community Noise Equivalent Level. Leq (12): The A -weighted equivalent sound level averaged over a 12 -hour period (usually the hours of operations).

2. Indoor standard with windows closed. Mechanical ventilation shall be provided per UBC requirements to provide.

A habitable environment.

3. Indoor environment excluding bathrooms, toilets, closets and corridors.

4. Outdoor environment limited to rear yard of single-family homes, multi-family patios and balconies (with a depth of 6’ or more) and common recreation areas.

5. Outdoor environment limited to playground areas, picnic areas, and other areas of frequent human use Source: City of Baldwin Park Noise Element, 2020; Title 24, California Code of Regulations

City of Baldwin Park Municipal Code
Section 153.140.070 of the City of Baldwin Park Municipal Code (BPMC) provides the following exterior noise standards within the City, which are applicable to the Project:
(A) Standards applicable to all zones. The regulations in this section aim to prohibit unnecessary, excessive and annoying noises from all sources, as certain noise levels are detrimental to the health and welfare of individuals. The standards apply to all land uses in all zones unless otherwise specified. (B) Noise measurements. Noise shall be measured with a sound level meter that meets the standards of the American National Standards Institute (ANSI Section S1.4- 1979, Type 1 or Type 2). The unit of measure shall be designated as a decibel (dBA). Noise levels shall be measured in dBA at the property line of the receptor property, and at least four feet above the ground and five feet from the nearest structure or wall. Where a boundary or wall exists, the measurement shall be made on the receptor

Impact Sciences, Inc. 8 Fit 7 Sports Lab Development Project Noise Memorandum 1489.001 October 2024
property. A calibration check shall be made of the instrument at the time any noise measurement is made.
(C) Exterior noise standards.
(1) No person shall create or allow the creation of noise that causes the exterior noise level to exceed the noise standards set forth in Table 153.140.070 (C).

Baldwin Park Municipal Code, Table 153.140.070(C) is included herein as Table 2 to this memorandum, as follows:

Table 2
City of Baldwin Park Noise Standards

Zone Time Allowable Noise Level
(dbA)
Residential 7 A.M – 7 P.M. (Day) 55
Residential 7 P.M – 10 P.M.(Evening) 50
Residential 10 P.M. – 7 A.M.(Night) 45
Commercial 7 A.M. – 10 P.M. (Day and Evening) 65
Commercial 7 P.M. – 7 A.M. (Night) 55
Industrial Anytime 65

Source: BPMC, Table 173.14.070(C), 2022.

Section 153.140.070 of the City of Baldwin Park Municipal Code (BPMC) provides the following interior noise standards within the City, which are applicable to the Project:
(D) Interior noise standards.
(1) No person shall create or allow the creation of noise that causes the interior noise level when measured within any dwelling unit to exceed 45 dbA at any time. 130.37 Special Noise Sources
Construction of buildings and projects. It is unlawful for any person within a residential zone, or within a radius of 500 feet therefrom, to operate equipment or perform any outside construction or repair work on buildings, structures, or projects or to operate any piledriver, power shovel, pneumatic hammer, derrick, power hoist, or any other construction type device (between the hours of 7:00 p.m. of one day and 7:00 a.m. of the next day) in such a manner that a reasonable person of normal sensitiveness residing in the area is caused discomfort or annoyance unless beforehand a permit therefor has been duly obtained from the Department of Public Works. No permit shall be required to perform emergency work as defined in § 130.31.

3. EXISTING SETTING
Measured Ambient Noise Levels
To establish baseline noise conditions, existing noise levels were monitored at two locations in the vicinity of the Project Site, and at one location along the southern property line of the Project Site. The locations of where the noise measurements were taken are depicted in Figure 4, Noise Monitoring and Sensitive Receptor Location Map. The noise survey was conducted in January 2023 and January 2024 using the Larson Davis SoundTrack LxT (Type 1) sound

Impact Sciences, Inc. 9 Fit 7 Sports Lab Development Project Noise Memorandum 1489.001 October 2024
level meter, which conforms to industry standards set forth in ANSI S1.4- 1983 (R2006) – Specification for Sound Level Meters/Type 1 and is consistent with the sound level meter definition established in the BPMC. This instrument was calibrated and operated according to the manufacturer’s written specifications. At the measurement sites, the microphone was placed at a height of approximately five feet above grade. The results of the measurements are summarized in Table 3, Existing Noise Levels in the Vicinity of the Project Site. As shown in Table 3, the ambient noise levels ranged from 49.7 dBA Leq to 64.3 dBA Leq in the vicinity the Project Site.

Table 3
Existing Noise Levels in the Vicinity of the Project Site

Noise Monitoring Locations Time Primary Noise Sources
Noise Levels (dBA)
Leq Lmin Lmax

1. Residences South of the Project Site
(fronting California Avenue) Day (7 AM – 7 PM) Vehicle Traffic, Neighborhood Activity 64.3 40.7 83.5

2. Project Site (northern boundary) Day (7AM – 7 PM) Frequent Vehicle Traffic 62.4 45.2 77.9

3. Project Site (southern property line) Day (7AM – 7 PM) Vehicle Traffic, Airplanes,
Industrial Activity,
Neighborhood Activity

49.7 45.4 62.8

3. Project Site (southern property line) Evening (7PM – 10 PM) Vehicle Traffic, Airplanes,
Industrial Activity,
Neighborhood Activity

52.5 45.9 67.8

Source: Impact Sciences, Inc., January 2023 and January 2024. See Appendix A to this memorandum.

4. PROJECT IMPACTS
Noise
Construction Impacts
Construction of the Project would require the use of heavy equipment for demolition, grading/site preparation, installation of utilities, building fabrication, and finishing. Construction activities would also involve the use of smaller power tools, genera tors, and other sources of noise. During each stage of construction, several types of equipment potentially could be operating concurrently, and noise levels would vary based on the amount of equipment in operation and the location of the activity. The Federal Highway Administration’s (FHWA) Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM) has compiled data regarding the noise -generating characteristics of specific types of construction equipment and typical construction activities.

Noise-sensitive land uses are generally considered to include those uses where noise exposure could result in health- related risks to individuals, as well as places where quiet is an essential element of their intended purpose. Residential dwellings are of primary concern because of the potential for increased and prolonged exposure of individuals to both interior and exterior noise levels. Additional land uses such as parks, historic sites, cemeteries, and recreation areas are considered sensitive to increases in exterior noise levels. Schools, churches, hotels, libraries, and other places where low interior noise levels are essential are also considered noise-sensitive land uses. The closest noise-sensitive receptors to the Project Site include adjacent re sidential uses to the south (see Figure 4, Noise Monitoring and Sensitive Receptor Location Map).

Joanbridge St
Mai
ne A
ve
Maine A
ve
Ca liforn ia Ave
Joanbridge St
Ca liforn ia Ave




¯
0 50 10025 US Feet
Project Site
Sensitive Receptor
Noise Monitoring Locations
#
#
Esri Community Maps Contributors, County of Los Angeles, California State Parks, © OpenStreetMap, Microsoft, Esri, TomTom, Garmin, SafeGraph, GeoTechnologies, Inc, METI/NASA, USGS, Bureau of Land Management, EPA, NPS, US Census Bureau, USDA, USFWS, Maxar, Microsoft Noise Monitoring and Sensitive Receptor Locations
FIGURE 4
1489.001•01/23
SOURCE: Esri 2023

Impact Sciences, Inc. 11 Fit 7 Sports Lab Development Project Noise Memorandum 1489.001 October 2024
With the use of the RCNM, as detailed in Appendix A ,2 the construction noise levels forecasted for the sensitive receptors are presented in Table 4, Estimated Exterior Construction Noise at Sensitive Receptors. Noise levels would diminish notably with distance from the construction site at a rate of 6 dBA per doubling of distance (noise from stationary or point sources is reduced by about 6 dBA for every doubling of distance at acoustically hard locations). 3 For example, a noise level of 86 dBA Leq measured at 50 feet from the noise source to the receptor would decline to 80 dBA Leq at 100 feet from the source to the receptor and fall by another 6 dBA L eq to 74 dBA L eq at 200 feet from the source to the receptor. These noise attenuation rates assume a flat and unobstructed distance between the noise generator and the receptor. Intervening structures and vegetation would further attenuate (reduce) the noise.

Furthermore, it should be noted that increases in noise levels at sensitive receptors during construction would be intermittent and temporary and would not generate continuously high noise levels. In addition, the construction noise experienced at sensitive receptors during the initial periods of construction (i.e., demolition and grading) typically would be reduced in the later construction periods (i.e., interior building construction). As the structure is built, the noise from interior construction work would be reduced at off- site locations because the proposed structure would break the line-of-sight noise transmission from the interior construction areas to the exterior areas of sensitive receptors.

Table 4
Estimated Exterior Construction Noise at Sensitive Receptors

Sensitive Land Uses
Distance to
Project Site
(feet)
Estimated Peak
Construction Noise Levels
(dBA 1-Hour Leq)
Exceed FTA 90 dBA
1-Hour Leq Criteria?

1. Residential uses to the South Adjacent 86.8 No

a See Figure 4 (Noise Monitoring and Sensitive Receptor Location Map). b See Appendix B to this IS/MND for details associated with equipment and distance assumptions for each phase of construction. This table summarizes the highest noise level during any of the construction phases.

Source: Impact Sciences, Inc., January 2023. See Appendix B to this IS/MND.

The City does not have specific limitation on construction noise levels. Instead, construction noise is regulated by limiting construction activity to the less noise sensitive daytime hours. Specifically, as stated previously, Section 130.37 of the BPMC states no person within a residential zone, or within a radius of 500 feet therefrom, to operate equipment or perform any outside construction or repair work on buildings, structures, or projects or to operate any piledriver, power shovel, pneumatic hammer, derrick, power hoist, or any other construction type device (between the hours of 7:00 p.m. of one day and 7:00 a.m. of the next day) in such a manner that a reasonable person of normal sensitiveness residing in the area is caused discomfort or annoyance unless beforehand a permit therefor has been duly obtained from the Department of Public Works. As the Project would comply with the daytime construction hours established in the BPMC, this analysis also uses the FTA’s general construction noise criteria of 90 dBA Leq (1- hour) 4 to provide
additional context for the Project’s potential to generate daytime construction noise impacts. In addition to the FTA guidance, this approach is also consistent with many jurisdictions within the State including Beverly Hills, Fresno, Pasadena, and Caltrans which use absolute (fixed) construction noise thresholds.5

2 Project construction noise levels were calculated based on the Project’s anticipated mix of construction equipment with the FHWA RCNM Version 1.1.
3 Federal Highway Administration, Highway Noise Fundamentals, (1980) 97. Examples of “hard” or reflective sites include asphalt, concrete, and hard and sparsely vegetated soils.
4 FTA, Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual, Table 7-2 (General Assessment Construction Noise Criteria), September 2018.
5 City of Beverly Hills Municipal Code Section 5-1-205; City of Fresno Municipal Code Section 10-109; City of Pasadena Municipal Code Chapter 9.36.07; Caltrans Traffic Noise Analysis Protocol Chapter 3.2.

Impact Sciences, Inc. 12 Fit 7 Sports Lab Development Project Noise Memorandum 1489.001 October 2024
While construction activity would increase noise levels in the vicinity of the Project Site (see Table 4), the Project’s construction activities would not exceed the FTA’s general construction noise criteria of 90 dBA Leq (1 -hour) at any sensitive receptors. Furthermore, Project construction would not occur during restricted periods, and thus, the Project would be consistent with the criteria set forth in the City’s Municipal Code. As such, construction noise impacts would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required.

Operational Impacts
Parking Noise
Various noise events would occur periodically from the Project’s parking uses. Such periodic events would include activation of car alarms, sounding of car horns, slamming of car doors, engine revs, and tire squeals. As noted previously in Table 3, the existing urban environment of the Project Site currently generates noise levels associated with parking and vehicular noise sources. Although the Project would increase the number of vehicles parking in the area by adding up to 39 parking spaces on s ite, the types of noise would be similar to those currently occurring in the vicinity of the Project Site. To establish potential noise levels associated with the Project’s parking activities, a noise survey and measurement were conducted at SOFIVE Soccer Center lo cated at 699 S. Barranca Avenue in Covina, which is approximately 5 miles southeast of the Project Site. This location was selected as a representative parking noise source because of its urban location and its operational characteristics are similar to t he Project. Specifically, SOFIVE Soccer Center is located in a mixed -use urban area with commercial uses to the north, single -family residential uses to the east, and recreational uses to the south and southwest. Furthermore, the operation is supported w ith 34 surface parking spaces in a lot nearest to the facility. During the noise survey and measurement, the surface parking lot was more than 90% full and activities observed included: vehicles entering, exiting, and parking in the lot; opening and closing car doors; and people walking, talking and dribbling/passing soccer balls. The measured noise level during these activities was recorded at 56.8 dBA Leq (see Appendix A for noise monitoring data). It is noted that the noise meter was placed directly within the parking lot without any obstructions or barriers between the noise meter and the parking lot sources. Based on a review of the Project’s plan set, site visit observations, and confirmation with the Project Applicant, the residential uses to the so uth of the Project Site would be shielded from Project parking activities by an existing 6-foot-high concrete masonry block wall. Vehicles parking on the Project Site would not be visible from the properties to the south, and line -of-sight noise transmission from parking -related noise sources would be blocked.

According to the FHWA Barrier Design Handbook, a concrete block wall carries a transmission loss (TL) value of approximately 34 dBA. TL is defined as the loss in sound energy, expressed in decibels, as sound passes through a barrier or a wall. According to the FHWA Noise Barrier Design Handbook, the design feasibility of a sound barrier that reduces noise by 10 dBA is considered “attainable.”
6 Therefore, while the data suggests that noise attenuation from this barrier may be greater than 10 dBA, it is reasonable to conservatively assume the concrete block wall would reduce parking related noise by 10 decibels at the properties to the south of the Project Site. With this reduction, parking noise levels at the properties to the south of the Project Site would be approximately 46.8 dBA Leq, which is below the allowable exterior daytime (7 AM - 7 PM) and evening (7 PM - 10 PM) noise standards for residential zones (see Table 1). The Project would not be operational during nighttime hours (10 PM – 7 AM) and would have no potential to conflict with nighttime standards. As such, the Project would be consistent with the City’s exterior noise standards and impacts would be less than significant.

Stationary Noise Sources
As part of the Project, new mechanical equipment, HVAC units, and exhaust fans would only be installed on the roof at the existing building at 14412 Joanbridge Street and will comply with the regulations of the BPMC. Specifically, Section 153.140.070 of the BPMC states:

E. Enclosed Equipment. Utilization of compressors or other equipment, including, but not limited, to vents, ducts and conduits, but excluding window or wall-mounted air-conditioners, which are located outside of

6 FHWA Noise Barrier Design Handbook, see Table 3, Table 4, and Terminology, July 14, 2011.

Impact Sciences, Inc. 13 Fit 7 Sports Lab Development Project Noise Memorandum 1489.001 October 2024
the exterior walls of any building, shall be enclosed within a permanent, noncombustible, view-obscuring enclosure to ensure that the equipment will not emit noise in excess of the ANSI standards.

In addition to these requirements, the Project will screen mechanical equipment as feasible and necessary to meet City noise standards. As such, compliance with Section 153.140.070 of the BPMC would ensure noise from stationary sources would be less than significant.

Exterior and Interior Soccer Noise
The Project includes four outdoor soccer fields on the rooftop of the proposed parking garage (second level). The soccer fields would introduce new sources of noise from children learning how to play soccer, people talking/coaching, and other related activities. As stated above, Project operation would not involve the use of whistles, buzzers, or horns to regulate activities and no amplified music or public address systems will be operated. Further, the Project would meet the minimum rear yard setback standards for lots that are zoned General Industrial, and are adjacent to residentially zoned lots.
7, 8
In order to assess the Project’s noise compatibility with the Project area, a noise survey and measurement were conducted at SOFIVE Soccer Center located at 699 S. Barranca Avenue in Covina, which is approximately 5 miles southeast of the Project Site. This location was selected as a representative noise source because of its urban location and its operational characteristics are similar to the Project. This facility includes 10 soccer fields of similar size as proposed by the Project. The noise meter was placed near three fields that were being used during the survey.

Activities observed during the survey included a six-player scrimmage with cheering and instructing at the nearest field (approximately 10 feet from noise meter), a five -player practice wit h cheering and instructing at an adjacent field (approximately 30 feet from the noise meter), and one -on-one drills with cheering and instructing on a third field (approximately 50 feet from the noise meter). These activities and distances between soccer noise sources and off-site receptors are representative of the proposed conditions at the Project Site. Amplified music and whistles were also observed during the measurement. It is noted that because the Project does not include amplified music or whistles, this reference noise level is conservative and is likely an overestimate of the noise anticipated for the Project. The measured noise level during these activities was recorded at 59.1 dBA Leq (see Appendix A for noise monitoring data).

It is noted that the noise meter was placed adjacent to the nearest field, and only a chain -link fence was between the meter and noise sources. Thus, no substantive noise-attenuating barriers affected the reference measurement. These facts further underscore that the noise measurements conducted at the SOFIVE facility present a conservate estimate of potential noise generation at the Project Site, as the Proposed Project will not include whistles or amplified music.

Based on a review of the Project’s plan set and confirmation with the Project Applicant, all off-site properties, including the residential uses to the south of the Project Site, would be shielded from Project soccer activities by a 12- to 17-foot- high padded wall proposed for the entire perimeter of the second level soccer fields. According to the Project Applicant, the Project’s design includes safety padding that would be a minimum of three inches thick and would be insulated with Rockwool AFB. While the padding is intended to provide a soft barrier for children playing at the facility, the material also provides sound absorption. This material can achieve a sound transmission class (STC) rating of approximately 44 to 56, which means the material has the potential to reduce noise transmission by approximately 44- 56 decibels.
9 According to the FHWA Noise Barrier Design Handbook, the design feasibility of a sound barrier that reduces noise by 10 dBA is considered “attainable.” 10 Therefore, while the data suggests that noise attenuation from this barrier may be greater than 10 dBA, it is reasonable to conservatively assume the padded wall would reduce soccer related noise by 10 decibels at all off -site locations, including the properties to the south of the Project Site. With this reduction due to the Project design, soccer related noise levels at the properties to the south of the Project Site would be approximately 49.1 dBA Leq, which is below the allowable exterior daytime (7 AM-7 PM) and evening (7 PM-10 PM) noise standards for residential zones (see Table 1). The Project would not be operational during nighttime hours (10

7 Trinidad Campbell Design and Building, Fit 7 Lab Football Intensive Training. May 25, 2023 8 City of Baldwin Municipal Code Section 153.050, Commercial and Industrial Zones. 9 Rockwool AFB; see https://www.rockwool.com/north-america/products-and-applications/products/afb/. 10 FHWA Noise Barrier Design Handbook, see Table 3, Table 4, and Terminology, July 14, 2011.

Impact Sciences, Inc. 14 Fit 7 Sports Lab Development Project Noise Memorandum 1489.001 October 2024
PM – 7 AM) and would have no potential to conflict with nighttime standards. As such, the Project would be consistent with the City’s exterior noise standards and impacts would be less than significant.

As demonstrated above, the estimated soccer related noise levels at the exterior of the properties south of the Project Site would be approximately 49.1 dBA Leq. Section 153.140.070 of BPMC, which provides interior noise standards within the City, states no person shall create or allow the creation of noise that causes the interior noise level when measured within any dwelling unit to exceed 45 dbA at any time. Exterior-to-interior noise reduction of buildings can reach 35 dBA or more, depending on the type of building materials and methods used. Specifically, light frame buildings, such as those located south of the Project Site, with closed ordinary sash windows reduce exterior noise transmission by approximately 20 dBA.11 As estimated exterior noise levels at properties to south of the Project Site would reach approximately 49.1 dBA Leq , the construction type and materials of the off -site residential buildings would reduce residential interior noise levels to approximately 29.1 dBA Leq, ensuring the Project is consistent with the City’s interior noise level standards for residences to the south . As such, impacts related to interior noise would be less than significant.

Airport Noise Impacts
The Project Site is not located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan and is not located within 2 miles of a public airport or public -use airport. The nearest airport to the Project Site is the San Gabriel Valley Airport (formerly known as the El Monte Airport), located approximately 4.28 miles southwest of the Project Site. Therefore, no impacts with respect to airstrip or airport related noise would occur and no further analysis is required.

Vibration
Section 153.140.090 of the City’s Municipal Code states vibration may disturb the conduct of certain activities and create discomfort for some individuals. To minimize the disturbance and inconvenience from vibrations, no person or use shall create, maintain or cause ground vibration that is discernable without the aid of instruments to a person of normal sensitivity at any point on a property that is adjacent to the property of the vibration source. The ground vibration caused by moving vehicles, trains, aircraft or temporary construction or demolition is exempted. Furthermore, it should be noted the Project would be consistent with Section 130.37 of the BPMC (Special Noise Sources — Construction and Building), which regulates construction activity in the City. While this section of the BPMC is applicable to construction noise, it would also ensure any annoyance impacts related to construction vibration would not occur during sensitive hours. Therefore, the Project would be constructed in accordance with all applicable provisions of the BPMC and vibration impacts with respect to human annoyance would be less than significant. The following analysis provides an assessment regarding the Project’s potential to cause vibration-related damage to nearby structures.

The FTA provides ground-born vibration impact criteria with respect to building damage during construction activities.

Peak Particle Velocity ( PPV), expressed in inches per second, is used to measure building vibration damage.

Construction vibration damage criteria are assessed based on structural category (e.g., reinforced- concrete, steel, or timber). FTA guidelines consider 0.2 inch/sec PPV to be the significant impact level for non -engineered timber and masonry buildings. Structures or buildings constructed of reinforced concrete, steel, or timber have a vibration damage criterion of 0.5 inch/sec PPV pursuant to FTA guidelines. 12 Using the parameters described previously for the construction noise analysis, construction vibration levels at off-site uses were calculated and are shown below in Table 5, Vibration Levels at Off -Site Sensitive Uses from Project Construction.

11 See Federal Highway Administration, Highway Traffic Noise Analysis and Abatement Guidance, December 2011, which states light frame buildings with closed ordinary sash windows can reduce exterior noise transmission by approximately 20 dBA, and double-glazed windows by approximately 35 dBA.
12 Federal Transit Administration, Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual, September 2018.

Impact Sciences, Inc. 15 Fit 7 Sports Lab Development Project Noise Memorandum 1489.001 October 2024

Table 5
Vibration Levels at Off-Site Sensitive Uses from Project Construction

Sensitive Uses Off-Sitea Distance to Project
Site (ft.)
Receptor
Significance
Threshold PPV
(in./sec)
Estimated PPV
(in/sec)

1. Adjacent residences to the south Adjacent 0.5 0.191

a See Figure 4 (Noise Monitoring and Sensitive Receptor Location Map). b While the Project includes construction activity up to the property lines of adjacent receptors, this analysis assumes that not all equipment would operate closer than 15 feet from the residential uses during peak activities.

Source: Impact Sciences, Inc., January 2023. See Appendix A.

The vibration velocities predicted to occur at the nearest sensitive receptors adjacent to the Project Site would be 0.191 in/sec PPV. These nearby structures are constructed of reinforced concrete, steel, or timber which have a vibration damage criterion of 0.5 inch/sec PPV pursuant to FTA guidelines. As shown in Table 5, Project construction vibration levels would not have the potential to exceed this standard and this impact would be less than significant.

5. CONCLUSION
Table 4 demonstrates that construction noise levels at nearby sensitive receptors would not exceed the FTA’s general construction noise criteria of 90 dBA Leq (1-hour). Additionally, the Project’s construction activities would be restricted to daytime hours, in accordance with the City’s Municipal Code, further minimizing noise impacts. Operational noise from parking, stationary noise sources, and soccer fields would also remain within the City’s exterior and interior noise standards. The Project Site’s location, outside the vicinity of any private airstrip or public airport, ensures there would be no impacts related to airport noise. Table 5 demonstrates that vibration would not exceed the FTA’s vibration damage criterion of 0.5 inch/sec PPV . Therefore, impacts related to construction and operational noise and vibration would be less than significant.

APPENDIX A
Noise and Vibration Data

NOISE MONITORING FIELD REPORT
Project Name: Flt 7 Sports Lab Development Project
Monitoring Location: ? n.c:;:, I! .. ,.. � 1 r� - .., fol/""� l<,,,cL.-,,Cf Date: I / 3 I 1-e' z.. 4 Site Number:

Measured By: Annalie Sarrieddine
Measurement Start Time: � • :i. 7- ?11
Measurement End Time: 6 '-1 l p,v,
Total Measurement Time: 15 min.

Noise Meter Model: Larson Davis Soundtrack LxT
Meter Setting: A-Weighted Sound Level (SLOW)
Session File Name: l xJ--_ � 3 <' 1-s-
Site Map
Calibration: 94.0 (dBA)
Primary Noise Sources: �<.I...<.. t �:<. , A-rr \"""'-'-s , l"'/4v; \.-, . ..1. r..(..�•.., �'a- , µ,. j'v-.\,orl...oo.J. �,_l-:v, 1-d"
Data Summary Other Noise Sources During Monitoring
Noise Noise Level 1. fJ · ,, el,-..c,. Time:

Scale {dBA)
� "�

2. � .... J i ....,- 'i:: "
�
Time: It> ; '2.C (
leq Wf 1-

3. Lmax t1 )"

4. Lmin 4S- '1 5.

Additional Notes:

V.J.idl.. t-,,__ff, C,
IMPACT�

SCIENCES
Time:

Time:

Time:
r ro IV\. ce,rs
3 /0/1/2 /3 /4 /5 /1/6/1/7 /8 /i255 /10 /1 /11 /12 /5 /8 /13/14/15 /16 /17 /18 /i255 /20 /21 /22/22/23 /17 /24
/0/1/8 /1 /5 /25 /3 /i255 /26 /27 /28 /1 /i255 /29 /2/6/1 /30 /31 /32 /33 /34 /2 /8 /2 /35 /36 /37 /38 /35 /3/39 /12/6/11/4 /8 /1 /5 /25 /3 /i255 /26 /27 /28 /1 /i255 /29 /2/6/1/30 /31 /32 /33 /37 /37 /37 /40 /41 /41 /38 /42 /43 /37 /43 /44 /37 /45 /37 /36 /i255 /45 /46 /43 /38 /43 /47 /42 /30 /31 /32 /33 /34 /2 /8 /2 /35 /36 /37 /38 /35 /28 /48 /49 /27 /7 /0/1/8 /1 /5 /30 /31 /32 /45 /i255 /37 /37 /37 /40 /41 /41 /38/26 /27 /5/6/50/2 /5 /1 /43 /35 /36 /37 /43 /51 /3 /1/5/30 /12 /52 /2 /8 /27 /12 /7
/53 /12 /49 /i255 /34 /1 /3 /52 /5 /27 /11 /8 /27 /12 /7 /29 /12 /8 /1
/54 /8 /2 /5 /8 /i255 /32 /27/6/1 /43 /37 /43 /44 /42 /37 /45 /42 /37 /36 /i255 /45 /46 /55 /43 /38 /55 /43 /47/34 /4 /5 /2 /8 /27 /12 /7 /37 /55 /45 /40 /55 /37 /37 /35 /37 /56 /7 /48 /i255 /32 /27/6/1 /43 /37 /43 /44 /42 /37 /45 /42 /37 /36 /i255 /45 /46 /55 /44 /43 /55 /43 /47/10 /4 /7 /i255 /32 /27/6/1 /37 /55 /45 /40 /55 /37 /37 /35 /37/57 /2 /4 /3 /1 /i255 /32 /27/6/1 /37 /55 /37 /37 /55 /37 /37 /35/37 /57 /5 /1 /42 /39 /2 /28 /27 /49 /5 /2 /8 /27 /12 /7/43 /37 /43 /44 /42 /37 /45 /42 /37 /36 /i255 /45 /40 /55 /36 /46 /55 /43 /45/57 /12 /3 /8 /42 /39 /2 /28 /27 /49 /5 /2 /8 /27 /12 /7/29 /12 /7 /1 /39 /2 /28 /27 /49 /5 /2 /8 /27 /12 /7 /i255 /34 /1 /58 /27 /2 /8 /27 /12 /7/42 /42 /42 /13/14/59 /21 /60 /18 /59
/61/58/1/5 /2 /28 /28 /i255/0/1/8 /5 /27 /52 /3
/30 /62/1 /63 /44 /47 /35 /38 /i255 /48 /64
/30 /62 /56 /38 /47 /35 /43 /i255 /48 /64/54 /56 /62 /42 /42 /42 /i255 /48 /64 /56 /62 /47 /35 /36 /i255 /65 /57 /2 /66 /67
/56 /62 /46 /43 /47 /46 /35 /41 /i255 /65 /57 /2 /66 /67 /56 /62 /44 /37 /45 /35 /40 /i255/6/57/2 /66 /67
/30 /62/11 /1 /2 /68 /46 /47 /35 /36 /i255 /48/64/43 /37 /43 /44 /42 /37 /45 /42 /37 /36 /i255 /45 /46 /55 /36 /36 /55 /43 /41 /30 /62 /54/6/2/31 /41 /43 /35 /46 /i255 /48/64/43 /37 /43 /44 /42 /37 /45 /42 /37 /36 /i255 /45 /46 /55 /43 /47 /55 /40 /38 /30 /62 /54/6/27/7 /44 /40 /35 /44 /i255 /48/64/43 /37 /43 /44 /42 /37 /45 /42 /37 /36 /i255 /45 /46 /55 /44 /45 /55 /45 /46 /30 /62/1 /63 /44 /47 /35 /38 /i255 /48 /64
/30 /39/1 /63 /41 /37 /35 /38 /i255 /48 /64/30 /39/1 /63/i255 /42 /i255 /30 /62/1 /63 /45 /45 /35 /37 /i255 /48 /64 /30 /62 /69/1 /63 /40 /44 /35 /36 /i255 /48 /64/30 /62 /69/1 /63/i255 /42 /i255 /30 /62/1 /63 /44 /35 /41 /i255 /48 /64 /56 /31 /52/1 /1 /48 /2 /7 /52 /1/3/39 /12 /4 /7/8/34/4 /5 /2 /8 /27 /12 /7 /30 /62 /54 /i255 /70 /i255 /46 /40 /35 /37 /i255 /48 /64/37/37 /55 /37 /37 /55 /37 /37 /35 /37 /30 /62 /54 /i255 /70 /i255 /45 /45 /40 /35 /37 /i255 /48 /64/37/37 /55 /37 /37 /55 /37 /37 /35 /37 /30 /62 /11 /68 /i255 /70 /i255 /45 /36 /40 /35 /37 /i255 /48 /64/37/37 /55 /37 /37 /55 /37 /37 /35 /37 /30 /62 /11 /68 /i255 /70 /i255 /45 /36 /38 /35 /37 /i255 /48 /64/37/37 /55 /37 /37 /55 /37 /37 /35 /37 /30 /62 /11 /68 /i255 /70 /i255 /45 /44 /37 /35 /37 /i255 /48 /64/37/37 /55 /37 /37 /55 /37 /37 /35 /37 /39 /12 /6/6/4/7 /27 /8 /71 /i255 /29 /12 /27 /3/1/30 /34/29/30 /34 /2/71/30 /29 /27 /72 /67 /8 /42 /42 /42 /i255 /48/64/42 /42 /42 /i255 /48/64/37 /35 /37 /i255 /48 /64 /30 /34 /56/29/30 /34 /2/71/30 /56 /58/1/30 /29 /27 /72 /67 /8 /42 /42 /42 /i255 /48/64/42 /42 /42 /i255 /48/64/42 /42 /42 /i255 /48/64/42 /42 /42 /i255 /48 /64 /62 /7 /71/i255 /34 /2 /8/2/62 /39 /73
/30 /1 /58 /1/28/32 /27/6/1/i255 /54 /8 /2/6/11 /30 /1 /58 /1/28/32 /27/6/1/i255 /54 /8 /2/6/11 /30/1 /58 /1 /28 /32 /27/6/1/i255 /54 /8 /2/6/11 /30/1 /63 /44 /47 /35 /38 /i255 /48/64/41 /37 /35 /38 /i255 /48/64/42 /42 /42 /i255 /48 /64 /30 /3/74/6/2/31 /75 /41 /43 /35 /46 /i255 /48/64/43 /37 /43 /44 /42 /37 /45 /42 /37 /36 /i255 /45 /46 /55 /43 /47 /55 /40/38/42 /42 /42 /i255 /48/64/29 /12 /7/1/42 /42 /42 /i255 /48/64/29 /12 /7 /1 /30 /54/74/6/27/7 /75 /44 /40 /35 /44 /i255 /48/64/43 /37 /43 /44 /42 /37 /45 /42 /37 /36 /i255 /45 /46 /55 /44 /45 /55 /45/46/42 /42 /42 /i255 /48/64/29 /12 /7/1/42 /42 /42 /i255 /48/64/29 /12 /7 /1 /30/57 /1 /2 /68 /74/6/2/31 /75 /46 /47 /35 /36 /i255 /48/64/43 /37 /43 /44 /42 /37 /45 /42 /37 /36 /i255 /45 /46 /55 /36 /36 /55 /43/41/42 /42 /42 /i255 /48/64/29 /12 /7/1/42 /42 /42 /i255 /48/64/29 /12 /7 /1 /61/58/1/5 /28 /12 /2 /48/3/39 /12 /4 /7/8/34 /4 /5 /2 /8 /27 /12/7/61 /64 /62 /i255 /39 /12 /4 /7/8/61 /64/62 /i255 /34 /4 /5 /2 /8 /27 /12 /7 /37/37 /55 /37 /37 /55 /37 /37 /35/37/37 /37 /55 /37 /37 /55 /37 /37 /35 /37 /54 /8 /2/8 /27 /3 /8 /27 /52 /3
/30 /62 /54 /i255 /37 /35 /37/42 /42 /42 /i255 /48 /64
/30 /62 /54 /i255 /37 /35 /37/42 /42 /42 /i255 /48 /64
/30 /62 /54 /i255 /45 /37 /35 /37/40 /43 /35 /37 /i255 /48 /64 /30 /62 /54 /i255 /36 /36 /35 /36/44 /47 /35 /43 /i255 /48 /64 /30 /62 /54 /i255 /41 /41 /35 /38/44 /38 /35 /47 /i255 /48 /64 /30 /62 /54 /i255 /47 /37 /35 /37/44 /38 /35 /37 /i255 /48 /64 /76 /77/78/79/i255 /81 /77 /82 /83 /84 /85 /86
/87 /88 /89
/0 /1 /2 /3 /4 /5
/6 /7 /8 /9 /7
/6 /7 /8 /10 /11
/6 /7 /8 /10 /9
/6 /7 /8 /10 /12
/6 /7 /8 /10 /13
/6 /7 /8 /10 /7
/6 /7 /8 /12 /11
/6 /7 /8 /12 /9
/11
/9 /11
/12 /11
/13 /11
/7 /11
/6 /11 /11
/6 /9 /11
/6 /12 /11

NOISE MONITORING FIELD REPORT
Project Name: Flt 7 Sports Lab Development Project
Monitoring Location: Pr�y .� $, � c. �-0t.tt,.f R,,,J,.,,,,, Date: 1/?/z.'-/ Site Number:

Measured By: Annalie Sarrieddine
Measurement Start Time: '7-· c � ? M
Measurement End Time: 1- , 'is � r"\
Total Measurement Time: 15 min.

Site Map
Noise Meter Model: Larson Davis Soundtrack LxT Calibration: 94.0 (dBA) Meter Setting: A-Weighted Sound Level (SLOW)
Session File Name: L.,.. � _ I") � t-c.._ . s oq s
PrimaryNoise Sources: V.,1.,,1� T,J: .. , /1.,pl-'(S, / ,.µsf/',J ;:;�; • ., "'l' ;0�, 1.J. ,,h-o..//J,,; f
,.,..r
Data Summary
Noise Noise Level
Scale (dBA)
leq sz �
Lmax 07. i
Lmin 4� q
Other Noise Sources During Monitoring

1. _ __:_lr..!.cr.,�!:::,,,..--------------Time: 7:ts,

2. __ t::>c::....::0
c..:::!:),.,.s...__�=--"--'IL=--'. ,..,-'d=>,----------Time: 7-, 0"1

3. __ ,;;,_;,,_.,..:.�_� _______________ Time: ?. 1 t:r

5. __________________ nme: ----
Additional Notes:
. V ,1., '"- '::!f • /;; }...J,,�,
IMPACT�

SCIENCES
3 /0/1/2 /3 /4 /5 /1/6/1/7 /8 /i255 /10 /1 /11 /12 /5 /8 /13/14/15 /16 /17 /18 /i255 /20 /21 /22/22/23 /17 /24
/0/1/8 /1 /5 /25 /3 /i255 /26 /27 /28 /1 /i255 /29 /2/6/1 /30 /31 /32 /33 /34 /2 /8 /2 /35 /36 /37 /38 /35 /3/39 /12/6/11/4 /8 /1 /5 /25 /3 /i255 /26 /27 /28 /1 /i255 /29 /2/6/1/30 /31 /32 /33 /37 /37 /37 /40 /41 /41 /42 /43 /44 /37 /44 /45 /37 /46 /37 /36 /i255 /46 /38 /37 /36 /40 /44 /43 /30 /31 /32 /33 /34 /2 /8 /2 /35 /36 /37 /38 /35 /28 /47 /48 /27 /7 /0/1/8 /1 /5 /30 /31 /32 /46 /i255 /37 /37 /37 /40 /41 /41 /42/26 /27 /5/6/49/2 /5 /1 /44 /35 /36 /37 /44 /50 /3 /1/5/30 /12 /51 /2 /8 /27 /12 /7
/52 /12 /48 /i255 /34 /1 /3 /51 /5 /27 /11 /8 /27 /12 /7 /29 /12 /8 /1
/53 /8 /2 /5 /8 /i255 /32 /27/6/1 /44 /37 /44 /45 /43 /37 /46 /43 /37 /36 /i255 /46 /38 /54 /37 /36 /54 /40 /44/34 /4 /5 /2 /8 /27 /12 /7 /37 /54 /46 /40 /54 /37 /37 /35 /37 /55 /7 /47 /i255 /32 /27/6/1 /44 /37 /44 /45 /43 /37 /46 /43 /37 /36 /i255 /46 /38 /54 /46 /56 /54 /40 /44/10 /4 /7 /i255 /32 /27/6/1 /37 /54 /46 /40 /54 /37 /37 /35 /37/57 /2 /4 /3 /1 /i255 /32 /27/6/1 /37 /54 /37 /37 /54 /37 /37 /35/37 /57 /5 /1 /43 /39 /2 /28 /27 /48 /5 /2 /8 /27 /12 /7/44 /37 /44 /45 /43 /37 /46 /43 /37 /36 /i255 /46 /40 /54 /36 /56 /54 /44 /46/57 /12 /3 /8 /43 /39 /2 /28 /27 /48 /5 /2 /8 /27 /12 /7/29 /12 /7 /1 /39 /2 /28 /27 /48 /5 /2 /8 /27 /12 /7 /i255 /34 /1 /58 /27 /2 /8 /27 /12 /7/43 /43 /43 /13/14/59 /21 /60 /18 /59
/61/58/1/5 /2 /28 /28 /i255/0/1/8 /5 /27 /51 /3
/30 /62/1 /63 /40 /44 /35 /40 /i255 /47 /64
/30 /62 /55 /56 /44 /35 /37 /i255 /47 /64/53 /55 /62 /43 /43 /43 /i255 /47 /64 /55 /62 /46 /42 /35 /56 /i255 /65 /57 /2 /66 /67
/55 /62 /56 /40 /41 /38 /35 /37 /i255 /65 /57 /2 /66 /67 /55 /62 /45 /37 /44 /35 /56 /i255/6/57/2 /66 /67
/30 /62/11 /1 /2 /68 /38 /45 /35 /44 /i255 /47/64/44 /37 /44 /45 /43 /37 /46 /43 /37 /36 /i255 /46 /38 /54 /37 /38 /54 /37 /36 /30 /62 /53/6/2/31 /41 /42 /35 /56 /i255 /47/64/44 /37 /44 /45 /43 /37 /46 /43 /37 /36 /i255 /46 /38 /54 /37 /38 /54 /46 /38 /30 /62 /53/6/27/7 /45 /40 /35 /38 /i255 /47/64/44 /37 /44 /45 /43 /37 /46 /43 /37 /36 /i255 /46 /38 /54 /37 /45 /54 /45 /56 /30 /62/1 /63 /40 /44 /35 /40 /i255 /47 /64
/30 /39/1 /63 /41 /44 /35 /46 /i255 /47 /64/30 /39/1 /63/i255 /43 /i255 /30 /62/1 /63 /38 /35 /41 /i255 /47 /64 /30 /62 /69/1 /63 /40 /38 /35 /36 /i255 /47 /64/30 /62 /69/1 /63/i255 /43 /i255 /30 /62/1 /63 /41 /35 /56 /i255 /47 /64 /55 /31 /51/1 /1 /47 /2 /7 /51 /1/3/39 /12 /4 /7/8/34/4 /5 /2 /8 /27 /12 /7 /30 /62 /53 /i255 /70 /i255 /56 /40 /35 /37 /i255 /47 /64/37/37 /54 /37 /37 /54 /37 /37 /35 /37 /30 /62 /53 /i255 /70 /i255 /46 /46 /40 /35 /37 /i255 /47 /64/37/37 /54 /37 /37 /54 /37 /37 /35 /37 /30 /62 /11 /68 /i255 /70 /i255 /46 /36 /40 /35 /37 /i255 /47 /64/37/37 /54 /37 /37 /54 /37 /37 /35 /37 /30 /62 /11 /68 /i255 /70 /i255 /46 /36 /42 /35 /37 /i255 /47 /64/37/37 /54 /37 /37 /54 /37 /37 /35 /37 /30 /62 /11 /68 /i255 /70 /i255 /46 /45 /37 /35 /37 /i255 /47 /64/37/37 /54 /37 /37 /54 /37 /37 /35 /37 /39 /12 /6/6/4/7 /27 /8 /71 /i255 /29 /12 /27 /3/1/30 /34/29/30 /34 /2/71/30 /29 /27 /72 /67 /8 /43 /43 /43 /i255 /47/64/43 /43 /43 /i255 /47/64/37 /35 /37 /i255 /47 /64 /30 /34 /55/29/30 /34 /2/71/30 /55 /58/1/30 /29 /27 /72 /67 /8 /43 /43 /43 /i255 /47/64/43 /43 /43 /i255 /47/64/43 /43 /43 /i255 /47/64/43 /43 /43 /i255 /47 /64 /62 /7 /71/i255 /34 /2 /8/2/62 /39 /73
/30 /1 /58 /1/28/32 /27/6/1/i255 /53 /8 /2/6/11 /30 /1 /58 /1/28/32 /27/6/1/i255 /53 /8 /2/6/11 /30/1 /58 /1 /28 /32 /27/6/1/i255 /53 /8 /2/6/11 /30/1 /63 /40 /44 /35 /40 /i255 /47/64/41 /44 /35 /46 /i255 /47/64/43 /43 /43 /i255 /47 /64 /30 /3/74/6/2/31 /75 /41 /42 /35 /56 /i255 /47/64/44 /37 /44 /45 /43 /37 /46 /43 /37 /36 /i255 /46 /38 /54 /37 /38 /54 /46/38/43 /43 /43 /i255 /47/64/29 /12 /7/1/43 /43 /43 /i255 /47/64/29 /12 /7 /1 /30 /53/74/6/27/7 /75 /45 /40 /35 /38 /i255 /47/64/44 /37 /44 /45 /43 /37 /46 /43 /37 /36 /i255 /46 /38 /54 /37 /45 /54 /45/56/43 /43 /43 /i255 /47/64/29 /12 /7/1/43 /43 /43 /i255 /47/64/29 /12 /7 /1 /30/57 /1 /2 /68 /74/6/2/31 /75 /38 /45 /35 /44 /i255 /47/64/44 /37 /44 /45 /43 /37 /46 /43 /37 /36 /i255 /46 /38 /54 /37 /38 /54 /37/36/43 /43 /43 /i255 /47/64/29 /12 /7/1/43 /43 /43 /i255 /47/64/29 /12 /7 /1 /61/58/1/5 /28 /12 /2 /47/3/39 /12 /4 /7/8/34 /4 /5 /2 /8 /27 /12/7/61 /64 /62 /i255 /39 /12 /4 /7/8/61 /64/62 /i255 /34 /4 /5 /2 /8 /27 /12 /7 /37/37 /54 /37 /37 /54 /37 /37 /35/37/37 /37 /54 /37 /37 /54 /37 /37 /35 /37 /53 /8 /2/8 /27 /3 /8 /27 /51 /3
/30 /62 /53 /i255 /37 /35 /37/43 /43 /43 /i255 /47 /64
/30 /62 /53 /i255 /37 /35 /37/43 /43 /43 /i255 /47 /64
/30 /62 /53 /i255 /46 /37 /35 /37/40 /40 /35 /36 /i255 /47 /64 /30 /62 /53 /i255 /36 /36 /35 /36/40 /37 /35 /37 /i255 /47 /64 /30 /62 /53 /i255 /41 /41 /35 /42/45 /56 /35 /46 /i255 /47 /64 /30 /62 /53 /i255 /38 /37 /35 /37/45 /42 /35 /46 /i255 /47 /64 /76 /77/78/79/i255 /81 /77 /82 /83 /84 /85 /86
/87 /88 /89
/0 /1 /2 /3 /4 /5
/6 /7 /8 /9 /10
/6 /7 /8 /9 /11
/6 /7 /8 /9 /12
/6 /7 /8 /6 /9
/6 /7 /8 /6 /13
/6 /7 /8 /6 /10
/6 /7 /8 /6 /11
/6 /7 /8 /6 /12
/9
/13 /9
/10 /9
/11 /9
/12 /9
/6 /9 /9
/6 /13 /9
/6 /10 /9

NOISE MONITORING FIELD REPORT
Project Name: Fit 7 Sports Lab Development Project
Monitoring Location: L,c.J k &< �.....: \: \-�
Date: It 11 L'f Site Number: /
Measured By: Annalie Sarrieddine
Measurement Start Time: c;-, 3 c,_
Measurement End Time: S-: ')'-( i>""'
Total Measurement Time: 15 min.

Noise Meter Model: Larson Davis Soundtrack LxT
Meter Setting: A-Weighted Sound Level (SLOW)
Session File Name: L ,,,,� 0 �.so � s
Site Map
Calibration: 94.0 (dBA)
Primary Noise Sources: n.,,.., I �(Z -<,.,' /)d-,· ..,,//.,., I h� ,0f?v.rs-,,,.I 7 , c,"�L ---y-Data Summary Other Noise Sources During Monitoring Noise Noise Level 1. Time:

Scale (dBA)

2. Time:
leq S-'f.l

3. Time:

Lmax 7'1. 'I

4. Time:

LmJn S-LI. 'J 5. Time:

Additional Notes:
#:cc., 4 r,/4- Eu,,;A:C ,�,. -.....oi« � S:-,;,c:::cy: 6-Jd"s IMPACT

SCIENCES

/0/1/2 /3 /4 /5 /1/6/1/7 /8 /i255 /10 /1 /11 /12 /5 /8
/13/14/15 /16 /17 /18 /i255 /20 /21 /22/22/23 /17 /24
/0/1/8 /1 /5 /25 /3 /i255 /26 /27 /28 /1 /i255 /29 /2/6/1 /30 /31 /32 /33 /34 /2 /8 /2 /35 /36 /37 /38 /35 /3/39 /12/6/11/4 /8 /1 /5 /25 /3 /i255 /26 /27 /28 /1 /i255 /29 /2/6/1/30 /31 /32 /33 /37 /37 /37 /40 /38 /38 /41 /42 /43 /37 /43 /44 /37 /45 /37 /36 /i255 /45 /41 /36 /46 /43 /37 /42 /30 /31 /32 /33 /34 /2 /8 /2 /35 /36 /37 /38 /35 /28 /47 /48 /27 /7 /0/1/8 /1 /5 /30 /31 /32 /45 /i255 /37 /37 /37 /40 /38 /38 /41/26 /27 /5/6/49/2 /5 /1 /43 /35 /36 /37 /43 /50 /3 /1/5/30 /12 /51 /2 /8 /27 /12 /7
/52 /12 /48 /i255 /34 /1 /3 /51 /5 /27 /11 /8 /27 /12 /7 /29 /12 /8 /1
/53 /8 /2 /5 /8 /i255 /32 /27/6/1 /43 /37 /43 /44 /42 /37 /45 /42 /37 /36 /i255 /45 /41 /54 /36 /46 /54 /43 /37/34 /4 /5 /2 /8 /27 /12 /7 /37 /54 /45 /40 /54 /37 /37 /35 /37 /55 /7 /47 /i255 /32 /27/6/1 /43 /37 /43 /44 /42 /37 /45 /42 /37 /36 /i255 /45 /41 /54 /40 /44 /54 /43 /37/10 /4 /7 /i255 /32 /27/6/1 /37 /54 /45 /40 /54 /37 /37 /35 /37/56 /2 /4 /3 /1 /i255 /32 /27/6/1 /37 /54 /37 /37 /54 /37 /37 /35/37 /56 /5 /1 /42 /39 /2 /28 /27 /48 /5 /2 /8 /27 /12 /7/43 /37 /43 /44 /42 /37 /45 /42 /37 /36 /i255 /45 /40 /54 /36 /57 /54 /43 /45/56 /12 /3 /8 /42 /39 /2 /28 /27 /48 /5 /2 /8 /27 /12 /7/29 /12 /7 /1 /39 /2 /28 /27 /48 /5 /2 /8 /27 /12 /7 /i255 /34 /1 /58 /27 /2 /8 /27 /12 /7/42 /42 /42 /13/14/59 /21 /60 /18 /59
/61/58/1/5 /2 /28 /28 /i255/0/1/8 /5 /27 /51 /3
/30 /62/1 /63 /40 /46 /35 /45 /i255 /47 /64
/30 /62 /55 /57 /57 /35 /38 /i255 /47 /64/53 /55 /62 /42 /42 /42 /i255 /47 /64 /55 /62 /57 /45 /35 /36 /i255 /65 /56 /2 /66 /67
/55 /62 /57 /43 /35 /38 /i255/6/56/2 /66 /67
/55 /62 /44 /37 /45 /36 /35 /37 /i255/6/56/2 /66 /67
/30 /62/11 /1 /2 /68 /46 /41 /35 /46 /i255 /47/64/43 /37 /43 /44 /42 /37 /45 /42 /37 /36 /i255 /45 /41 /54 /40 /43 /54 /36 /38 /30 /62 /53/6/2/31 /41 /44 /35 /44 /i255 /47/64/43 /37 /43 /44 /42 /37 /45 /42 /37 /36 /i255 /45 /41 /54 /44 /37 /54 /45 /43 /30 /62 /53/6/27/7 /40 /44 /35 /41 /i255 /47/64/43 /37 /43 /44 /42 /37 /45 /42 /37 /36 /i255 /45 /41 /54 /40 /36 /54 /40 /57 /30 /62/1 /63 /40 /46 /35 /45 /i255 /47 /64
/30 /39/1 /63 /38 /46 /35 /44 /i255 /47 /64/30 /39/1 /63/i255 /42 /i255 /30 /62/1 /63 /45 /37 /35 /36 /i255 /47 /64 /30 /62 /69/1 /63 /38 /44 /35 /38 /i255 /47 /64/30 /62 /69/1 /63/i255 /42 /i255 /30 /62/1 /63 /40 /35 /40 /i255 /47 /64 /55 /31 /51/1 /1 /47 /2 /7 /51 /1/3/39 /12 /4 /7/8/34/4 /5 /2 /8 /27 /12 /7 /30 /62 /53 /i255 /70 /i255 /57 /40 /35 /37 /i255 /47 /64/37/37 /54 /37 /37 /54 /37 /37 /35 /37 /30 /62 /53 /i255 /70 /i255 /45 /45 /40 /35 /37 /i255 /47 /64/37/37 /54 /37 /37 /54 /37 /37 /35 /37 /30 /62 /11 /68 /i255 /70 /i255 /45 /36 /40 /35 /37 /i255 /47 /64/37/37 /54 /37 /37 /54 /37 /37 /35 /37 /30 /62 /11 /68 /i255 /70 /i255 /45 /36 /41 /35 /37 /i255 /47 /64/37/37 /54 /37 /37 /54 /37 /37 /35 /37 /30 /62 /11 /68 /i255 /70 /i255 /45 /44 /37 /35 /37 /i255 /47 /64/37/37 /54 /37 /37 /54 /37 /37 /35 /37 /39 /12 /6/6/4/7 /27 /8 /71 /i255 /29 /12 /27 /3/1/30 /34/29/30 /34 /2/71/30 /29 /27 /72 /67 /8 /42 /42 /42 /i255 /47/64/42 /42 /42 /i255 /47/64/37 /35 /37 /i255 /47 /64 /30 /34 /55/29/30 /34 /2/71/30 /55 /58/1/30 /29 /27 /72 /67 /8 /42 /42 /42 /i255 /47/64/42 /42 /42 /i255 /47/64/42 /42 /42 /i255 /47/64/42 /42 /42 /i255 /47 /64 /62 /7 /71/i255 /34 /2 /8/2/62 /39 /73
/30 /1 /58 /1/28/32 /27/6/1/i255 /53 /8 /2/6/11 /30 /1 /58 /1/28/32 /27/6/1/i255 /53 /8 /2/6/11 /30/1 /58 /1 /28 /32 /27/6/1/i255 /53 /8 /2/6/11 /30/1 /63 /40 /46 /35 /45 /i255 /47/64/38 /46 /35 /44 /i255 /47/64/42 /42 /42 /i255 /47 /64 /30 /3/74/6/2/31 /75 /41 /44 /35 /44 /i255 /47/64/43 /37 /43 /44 /42 /37 /45 /42 /37 /36 /i255 /45 /41 /54 /44 /37 /54 /45/43/42 /42 /42 /i255 /47/64/29 /12 /7/1/42 /42 /42 /i255 /47/64/29 /12 /7 /1 /30 /53/74/6/27/7 /75 /40 /44 /35 /41 /i255 /47/64/43 /37 /43 /44 /42 /37 /45 /42 /37 /36 /i255 /45 /41 /54 /40 /36 /54 /40/57/42 /42 /42 /i255 /47/64/29 /12 /7/1/42 /42 /42 /i255 /47/64/29 /12 /7 /1 /30/56 /1 /2 /68 /74/6/2/31 /75 /46 /41 /35 /46 /i255 /47/64/43 /37 /43 /44 /42 /37 /45 /42 /37 /36 /i255 /45 /41 /54 /40 /43 /54 /36/38/42 /42 /42 /i255 /47/64/29 /12 /7/1/42 /42 /42 /i255 /47/64/29 /12 /7 /1 /61/58/1/5 /28 /12 /2 /47/3/39 /12 /4 /7/8/34 /4 /5 /2 /8 /27 /12/7/61 /64 /62 /i255 /39 /12 /4 /7/8/61 /64/62 /i255 /34 /4 /5 /2 /8 /27 /12 /7 /37/37 /54 /37 /37 /54 /37 /37 /35/37/37 /37 /54 /37 /37 /54 /37 /37 /35 /37 /53 /8 /2/8 /27 /3 /8 /27 /51 /3
/30 /62 /53 /i255 /37 /35 /37/42 /42 /42 /i255 /47 /64
/30 /62 /53 /i255 /37 /35 /37/42 /42 /42 /i255 /47 /64
/30 /62 /53 /i255 /45 /37 /35 /37/38 /37 /35 /57 /i255 /47 /64 /30 /62 /53 /i255 /36 /36 /35 /36/40 /57 /35 /44 /i255 /47 /64 /30 /62 /53 /i255 /38 /38 /35 /41/40 /41 /35 /45 /i255 /47 /64 /30 /62 /53 /i255 /46 /37 /35 /37/40 /38 /35 /43 /i255 /47 /64 /76 /77/78/79/i255 /81 /77 /82 /83 /84 /85 /86
/87 /88 /89
/0 /1 /2 /3 /4 /5
/6 /7 /8 /9 /10
/6 /7 /8 /9 /11
/6 /7 /8 /9 /9
/6 /7 /8 /9 /12
/6 /7 /8 /9 /13
/6 /7 /8 /14 /10
/6 /7 /8 /14 /11
/6 /7 /8 /14 /9
/10
/11 /10
/9 /10
/12 /10
/13 /10
/6 /10 /10
/6 /11 /10
/6 /9 /10

NOISE MONITORING FIELD REPORT
Project Nam�: Fit 7 Sports Lab Development Project
Monitoring Location: ta.,!�� /=""-<-4, l.'i-y
Date: l / J t L"i Site Number: -z.._
Measured By: Annalie Sarrieddine
Measurement Start Time: 'i? i � 0 t'""
Measurement End Time: "ir, '-t s-,. I""\
Total Measurement Time: 15 min.

Noise Meter Model: Larson Davis Soundtrack LxT
Meter Setting: A-Weighted Sound Level (SLOW)
Session File Name: L ><� 0-4-.,__ . � ,, 'So
Site Map
Calibration: 94.0 (dBA)
Primary Noise Sources: v��k, ,41;-·7 I ?47�,.1 w1t-//C::,' 'l
,,,? /,.-:::-.,..... e,;_..r
Data Summary Other Noise Sources During Monitoring
Noise Noise Level
Scale (dBA)
leq a.f
lmax c,,�.?
Lmln 1-6.2
J)de

IMPACT SCIENCES

1. Time:

2. Time:

3. Time:

4. Time:

5. Time:

/0/1/2 /3 /4 /5 /1/6/1/7 /8 /i255 /10 /1 /11 /12 /5 /8
/13/14/15 /16 /17 /18 /i255 /20 /21 /22/22/23 /17 /24
/0/1/8 /1 /5 /25 /3 /i255 /26 /27 /28 /1 /i255 /29 /2/6/1 /30 /31 /32 /33 /34 /2 /8 /2 /35 /36 /37 /37 /35 /3/38 /12/6/11/4 /8 /1 /5 /25 /3 /i255 /26 /27 /28 /1 /i255 /29 /2/6/1/30 /31 /32 /33 /39 /39 /39 /40 /41 /41 /42 /43 /44 /39 /44 /45 /39 /37 /39 /36 /i255 /44 /39 /36 /39 /44 /39 /43 /30 /31 /32 /33 /34 /2 /8 /2 /35 /36 /37 /37 /35 /28 /46 /47 /27 /7 /0/1/8 /1 /5 /30 /31 /32 /37 /i255 /39 /39 /39 /40 /41 /41 /42/26 /27 /5/6/48/2 /5 /1 /44 /35 /36 /39 /44 /49 /3 /1/5/30 /12 /50 /2 /8 /27 /12 /7
/51 /12 /47 /i255 /34 /1 /3 /50 /5 /27 /11 /8 /27 /12 /7 /29 /12 /8 /1
/52 /8 /2 /5 /8 /i255 /32 /27/6/1 /44 /39 /44 /45 /43 /39 /37 /43 /39 /36 /i255 /44 /39 /53 /36 /39 /53 /44 /39/34 /4 /5 /2 /8 /27 /12 /7 /39 /53 /37 /40 /53 /39 /39 /35 /39 /54 /7 /46 /i255 /32 /27/6/1 /44 /39 /44 /45 /43 /39 /37 /43 /39 /36 /i255 /44 /39 /53 /45 /40 /53 /44 /39/10 /4 /7 /i255 /32 /27/6/1 /39 /53 /37 /40 /53 /39 /39 /35 /39/55 /2 /4 /3 /1 /i255 /32 /27/6/1 /39 /53 /39 /39 /53 /39 /39 /35/39 /55 /5 /1 /43 /38 /2 /28 /27 /47 /5 /2 /8 /27 /12 /7/44 /39 /44 /45 /43 /39 /37 /43 /39 /36 /i255 /37 /40 /53 /36 /56 /53 /44 /37/55 /12 /3 /8 /43 /38 /2 /28 /27 /47 /5 /2 /8 /27 /12 /7/29 /12 /7 /1 /38 /2 /28 /27 /47 /5 /2 /8 /27 /12 /7 /i255 /34 /1 /57 /27 /2 /8 /27 /12 /7/43 /43 /43 /13/14/58 /21 /59 /18 /58
/60/57/1/5 /2 /28 /28 /i255/0/1/8 /5 /27 /50 /3
/30 /61/1 /62 /40 /41 /35 /56 /i255 /46 /63
/30 /61 /54 /56 /41 /35 /36 /i255 /46 /63/52 /54 /61 /43 /43 /43 /i255 /46 /63 /54 /61 /45 /42 /35 /64 /i255 /65 /55 /2 /66 /67
/54 /61 /56 /37 /35 /40 /i255/6/55/2 /66 /67
/54 /61 /45 /39 /42 /35 /42 /i255/6/55/2 /66 /67
/30 /61/11 /1 /2 /68 /56 /42 /35 /40 /i255 /46/63/44 /39 /44 /45 /43 /39 /37 /43 /39 /36 /i255 /44 /39 /53 /36 /45 /53 /39 /56 /30 /61 /52/6/2/31 /41 /45 /35 /64 /i255 /46/63/44 /39 /44 /45 /43 /39 /37 /43 /39 /36 /i255 /44 /39 /53 /36 /44 /53 /40 /64 /30 /61 /52/6/27/7 /45 /41 /35 /44 /i255 /46/63/44 /39 /44 /45 /43 /39 /37 /43 /39 /36 /i255 /44 /39 /53 /45 /36 /53 /37 /64 /30 /61/1 /62 /40 /41 /35 /56 /i255 /46 /63
/30 /38/1 /62 /42 /39 /35 /44 /i255 /46 /63/30 /38/1 /62/i255 /43 /i255 /30 /61/1 /62 /37 /36 /35 /45 /i255 /46 /63 /30 /61 /69/1 /62 /40 /56 /35 /56 /i255 /46 /63/30 /61 /69/1 /62/i255 /43 /i255 /30 /61/1 /62 /44 /35 /39 /i255 /46 /63 /54 /31 /50/1 /1 /46 /2 /7 /50 /1/3/38 /12 /4 /7/8/34/4 /5 /2 /8 /27 /12 /7 /30 /61 /52 /i255 /70 /i255 /56 /40 /35 /39 /i255 /46 /63/39/39 /53 /39 /39 /53 /39 /39 /35 /39 /30 /61 /52 /i255 /70 /i255 /37 /37 /40 /35 /39 /i255 /46 /63/39/39 /53 /39 /39 /53 /39 /39 /35 /39 /30 /61 /11 /68 /i255 /70 /i255 /37 /36 /40 /35 /39 /i255 /46 /63/39/39 /53 /39 /39 /53 /39 /39 /35 /39 /30 /61 /11 /68 /i255 /70 /i255 /37 /36 /42 /35 /39 /i255 /46 /63/39/39 /53 /39 /39 /53 /39 /39 /35 /39 /30 /61 /11 /68 /i255 /70 /i255 /37 /45 /39 /35 /39 /i255 /46 /63/39/39 /53 /39 /39 /53 /39 /39 /35 /39 /38 /12 /6/6/4/7 /27 /8 /71 /i255 /29 /12 /27 /3/1/30 /34/29/30 /34 /2/71/30 /29 /27 /72 /67 /8 /43 /43 /43 /i255 /46/63/43 /43 /43 /i255 /46/63/39 /35 /39 /i255 /46 /63 /30 /34 /54/29/30 /34 /2/71/30 /54 /57/1/30 /29 /27 /72 /67 /8 /43 /43 /43 /i255 /46/63/43 /43 /43 /i255 /46/63/43 /43 /43 /i255 /46/63/43 /43 /43 /i255 /46 /63 /61 /7 /71/i255 /34 /2 /8/2/61 /38 /73
/30 /1 /57 /1/28/32 /27/6/1/i255 /52 /8 /2/6/11 /30 /1 /57 /1/28/32 /27/6/1/i255 /52 /8 /2/6/11 /30/1 /57 /1 /28 /32 /27/6/1/i255 /52 /8 /2/6/11 /30/1 /62 /40 /41 /35 /56 /i255 /46/63/42 /39 /35 /44 /i255 /46/63/43 /43 /43 /i255 /46 /63 /30 /3/74/6/2/31 /75 /41 /45 /35 /64 /i255 /46/63/44 /39 /44 /45 /43 /39 /37 /43 /39 /36 /i255 /44 /39 /53 /36 /44 /53 /40/64/43 /43 /43 /i255 /46/63/29 /12 /7/1/43 /43 /43 /i255 /46/63/29 /12 /7 /1 /30 /52/74/6/27/7 /75 /45 /41 /35 /44 /i255 /46/63/44 /39 /44 /45 /43 /39 /37 /43 /39 /36 /i255 /44 /39 /53 /45 /36 /53 /37/64/43 /43 /43 /i255 /46/63/29 /12 /7/1/43 /43 /43 /i255 /46/63/29 /12 /7 /1 /30/55 /1 /2 /68 /74/6/2/31 /75 /56 /42 /35 /40 /i255 /46/63/44 /39 /44 /45 /43 /39 /37 /43 /39 /36 /i255 /44 /39 /53 /36 /45 /53 /39/56/43 /43 /43 /i255 /46/63/29 /12 /7/1/43 /43 /43 /i255 /46/63/29 /12 /7 /1 /60/57/1/5 /28 /12 /2 /46/3/38 /12 /4 /7/8/34 /4 /5 /2 /8 /27 /12/7/60 /63 /61 /i255 /38 /12 /4 /7/8/60 /63/61 /i255 /34 /4 /5 /2 /8 /27 /12 /7 /39/39 /53 /39 /39 /53 /39 /39 /35/39/39 /39 /53 /39 /39 /53 /39 /39 /35 /39 /52 /8 /2/8 /27 /3 /8 /27 /50 /3
/30 /61 /52 /i255 /39 /35 /39/43 /43 /43 /i255 /46 /63
/30 /61 /52 /i255 /39 /35 /39/43 /43 /43 /i255 /46 /63
/30 /61 /52 /i255 /37 /39 /35 /39/40 /64 /35 /64 /i255 /46 /63 /30 /61 /52 /i255 /36 /36 /35 /36/40 /42 /35 /44 /i255 /46 /63 /30 /61 /52 /i255 /41 /41 /35 /42/40 /36 /35 /56 /i255 /46 /63 /30 /61 /52 /i255 /64 /39 /35 /39/40 /39 /35 /44 /i255 /46 /63 Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM),Version 1.1
Report date: 1/24/2023
Case Description: Fit  7 Lab Building Construction
‐‐‐‐ Receptor #1 ‐‐‐‐
Baselines (dBA)
Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night
Residences to the South Residential 60 60 60
Equipment
Spec Actual Receptor Estimated
Impact Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding
Description Device Usage(%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA)
Crane No 16 80.6 25 0
Tractor No 40 84 25 0
Results
Calculated (dBA) Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night
Equipment *Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Crane 86.6 78.6 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Tractor 90 86 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 90 86.8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A *Calculated Lmax is the Loudest value.

NOTE: Given the dynamic nature of building construction equipment, distance estimate assumes equipment would not operate closer than an average of 25 feet during a one‐hour period.

Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM),Version 1.1
Report date: 1/24/2023
Case Description: Fit  7 Lab Demolition
‐‐‐‐ Receptor #1 ‐‐‐‐
Baselines (dBA)
Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night
Residences to the South Residential 60 60 60
Equipment
Spec Actual Receptor Estimated
Impact Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding
Description Device Usage(%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA)
Backhoe No 40 77.6 100 0
Tractor No 40 84 100 0
Concrete Saw No 20 89.6 100 0
Dozer No 40 81.7 100 0
NOTE: Distance estimated from building demolition to nearest residential property line Results
Calculated (dBA) Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night
Equipment *Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Backhoe 71.5 67.6 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Tractor 78 74 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Concrete Saw 83.6 76.6 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Dozer 75.6 71.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 83.6 79.6 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A *Calculated Lmax is the Loudest value.

Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM),Version 1.1
Report date: 1/24/2023
Case Description: Fit  7 Lab Grading
‐‐‐‐ Receptor #1 ‐‐‐‐
Baselines (dBA)
Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night
Residences to the South Residential 60 60 60
Equipment
Spec Actual Receptor Estimated
Impact Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding
Description Device Usage(%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA)
Grader No 40 85 25 0
Dozer No 40 81.7 25 0
Results
Calculated (dBA) Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night
Equipment *Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Grader 91 87 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Dozer 87.7 83.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 91 88.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A *Calculated Lmax is the Loudest value.

NOTE: Given the dynamic nature of mobile grading equipment, distance estimate assumes grading equipment would not operate closer than an average of 25 feet during a one‐hour period. Said another way, it is assumed equipment could operate within 25 feet for some part of 1 hour, but would also operate farther than 25 feet during a 1‐hour period.

Fit 7 Lab Residences to the South
Ref= Reference vibration level (PPV )
RefD= Reference distance for Reference vibration level (Feet ) Vibration PPV
Ref= 0.089 Based on type of equipmen t
RefD= 25
D= 15 Distance from equipment to sensitive recepto r
Equip= 0.191
Annoyance VdB
Ref= 87 Based on type of equipmen t
RefD= 25
D= 15 Distance from equipment to sensitive recepto r
Equip= 94
Peak demolition vibration based on utilizing a large bulldozer.

Source: FTA Tranist Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment, 2006.

APPENDIX C
Screening Memorandum

Kittelson & Associates, Inc.

Technical Memorandum

Kittelson & Associates, Inc. (Kittelson) has prepared this vehicle miles traveled (VMT) screening memorandum for the proposed Fit 7 Lab Football Intensive Training facility, located at 14412 and 14424 Joanbridge Street in the City of Baldwin Park, California (“project”). This memorandum presents the results of the screening analysis to determine whether the proposed project may result in a potentially significant VMT impact, and therefore require a more detailed California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) VMT impact analysis, per the City of Baldwin Park’s adopted VMT standards (June 2020). This memo includes the following sections:
 Project Description
 Trip Generation Estimate
 VMT Screening Assessment
 Conclusion and Next Steps

PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The project applicant is proposing to demolish the existing building at 14424 Joanbridge Street to provide necessary parking, convert the existing building at 14412 Joanbridge Street into a soccer sports complex and develop a total of five (5) soccer fields, including one (1) inside the 14412 building and four (4) outdoor above the parking facility.

The project would include 26,244 square feet of parking lot space, 6,813 square feet of building space, and 331.25 square feet of restrooms. The total area of the lot sizes (on 14412 and 14424 Joanbridge Street) is 26,244 square feet. The current proposed site plan is shown in Figure 1.

750 The City Drive, Suite 410
Orange, CA 92868

October 14, 2024 Project# 30472
To: Jessica Kirchner, AICP – Impact Sciences

From: Karen Phan, AICP – Kittelson & Associates, Inc.

RE: Fit 7 Lab Football Intensive Training – Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Screening Memorandum October 14, 2024 Page 2
Fit 7 Lab Football Intensive Training – Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Screening Memorandum Kittelson & Associates, Inc.

Figure 1 Site Plan

Site plan dated 5/25/2023, drawn by Trinidad Campbell Design & Building; Site plan received by Kittelson & Associates, Inc: 7/23/2024

October 14, 2024 Page 3
Fit 7 Lab Football Intensive Training – Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Screening Memorandum Kittelson & Associates, Inc.

TRIP GENERATION ESTIMATE
The City of Baldwin Park’s screening criteria for exempting projects from VMT analysis include project trip generation. Given that this project consists of a non-standard use that is not included in traditional trip generation rate sources such as the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, Kittelson estimated trip generation for the proposed project using data collected at a comparable site in 2021. The Lab Five soccer center located at 9740 Telfair Avenue in the City of Pacoima was previously reviewed by Kittelson, and trip generation rates (per soccer field) were developed. This location has eight soccer fields, plus parking. While the Pacoima site is a larger site, the land use is comparable and the trip generation was normalized to the number of fields in order to develop per-field trip generation rates for this project.

For the purposes of developing per-field trip generation rates, inbound and outbound trips were collected at the Pacoima site during one weekday to develop per-field trip generation rates, which were then used to develop trip generation estimates for the proposed project. Given that the soccer fields are the project’s primary trip-generating use supported by other buildings on the site, it is appropriate to develop per-field rates from the Pacoima site and apply them to the proposed Baldwin Park site. Some patrons of the Pacoima location park off-site and walk to the center. As such, driveway counts were conducted, including both vehicles and pedestrians. While bicycle counts were also collected, no bicyclists were observed entering or leaving the site. For the purpose of estimating vehicle trip generation, inbound and outbound pedestrian trips were conservatively included as vehicle trips.

The data collected at the Pacoima site was used to estimate per-field trip generation rates for four time periods:
 Weekday daily
 Weekday AM peak hour – This represents the peak hourly trip generation during the weekday AM peak period of the local roadway network (from 7:00 AM to 9:00 AM). Note that the estimated weekday AM trip generation rate is 0.0 per field, since no activity was observed at the Pacoima site during the AM hours; this is consistent with the proposed project’s weekday hours of operation.  Weekday PM peak hour – This represents the peak hourly trip generation during the weekday PM peak period of the local roadway network (from 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM).  Project weekday peak hour – This represents the project’s hour of highest trip generation for the entirety of the day. Note that this period is included for informational purposes, as standard transportation analyses requirements typically do not require the evaluation of a project’s peak hour of activity.

The inbound and outbound trip generation rates were derived from the eight-field Pacoima site (driveway counts were divided by 8 to obtain rates, with inbound/outbound percentages based on the driveway trip patterns). Rates were then applied to the proposed five-field project in Baldwin Park.

Trip generation for the existing site buildings were also calculated using the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition. ITE land use code 140 (Manufacturing) was used to provide trip rates. A trip generation credit was then applied for these uses, which were active at the time the project application was initiated.

As shown in Table 1, the proposed project is expected to generate 85 net new weekday daily vehicle trips.

October 14, 2024 Page 4
Fit 7 Lab Football Intensive Training – Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Screening Memorandum Kittelson & Associates, Inc.

Table 1: Project Trip Generation Estimate
Trip Generation Rates*
Rate Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Project Weekday Peak Hour
In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total
Per field (soccer
center)

28.25 -- -- 0.00 75% 25% 1.00 83% 17% 8.63
Per KSF
(Manufacturing)

4.75 76% 24% 8.00 31% 69% 9.00 42% 58% 9.00
Trip Generation Estimates (Soccer Center)
Rate Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Project Weekday Peak Hour
In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total
5 fields 141 0 0 0 4 1 5 36 7 43
Trip Generation Credit **
Rate Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Project Weekday Peak Hour***
In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total
N/A 56 6 2 8 3 6 9 4 5 9
Net Trip Generation Estimate
Rate Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Project Weekday Peak Hour
In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total
N/A 85 -6 -2 -8 1 -5 -4 32 2 34

Source: Kittelson & Associates, Inc., 2024
*Note: These rates were derived from driveway counts collected at a comparable site in Pacoima, CA. The weekday AM and weekday PM peak hour trip generation rates represent the project’s expected peak hourly trip generation during the morning and evening peak periods of the local roadway network (7:00- 9:00 AM and 4:00-6:00 PM, respectively). The project weekday peak hour trip generation rate represents the project’s hour of highest trip generation for the entirety of the day. **Land uses at the time application was initiated were manufacturing (ITE land use code 140). ***Weekday, PM Peak Hour of Generator rates were used.

October 14, 2024 Page 5
Fit 7 Lab Football Intensive Training – Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Screening Memorandum Kittelson & Associates, Inc.

VMT SCREENING ASSESSMENT
According to the City’s adopted VMT standards,1 a project may be exempt from a detailed VMT analysis if it meets at least one of the following four screening criteria:

1. Project Type Screening – Retail projects up to 50,000 square feet and projects that generate fewer than 110 vehicle trips per day are classified as ‘small projects’ and are presumed to have a less than significant VMT impact. – Since this project is expected to generate approximately 85 net new daily trips, the project meets this screening criterion.

2. Low VMT Screening -- Residential and office projects that are proposed in areas that generate VMT below adopted City thresholds (defined as 15% below baseline VMT metrics) are presumed to have a less than significant VMT impact and thus can be screened out. -- This project is a unique use that would not be analyzed using either of these VMT metrics, as it is not a residential use or office use. As such, the project does not meet this screening criterion.

3. Transit Priority Area (TPA) Screening – Projects located in TPAs (within a half-mile radius of a major transit stop2 that is existing or planned) do not require a detailed VMT analysis. The proposed project is located more than a half-mile from the nearest Metrolink station and the area is not a planned TPA per the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/STS). – The project does not meet this screening criterion.

4. Affordable Housing Screening – Affordable housing developments or affordable housing units within mixed-use developments are presumed to have a less than significant impact and should be screened out of needing a detailed VMT analysis. – The project does not involve construction of residential units and does not meet this screening criterion.

Table 2 provides a VMT screening summary for the project. To be screened out of a detailed VMT analysis, a project would need to satisfy at least one of the VMT screening criteria. Given that the project meets the project type screening, the project is screened out of a VMT analysis.

Table 2 VMT Screening Summary
VMT Screening Criteria Criterion Met?
Project Type Screening Yes
Low VMT Screening No
Transit Priority Area Screening No
Affordable Housing Screening No
Source: Kittelson & Associates, Inc., 2024

CONCLUSION AND NEXT STEPS
Per the City’s standards, the project can be screened out of a detailed VMT analysis since it meets the requirements for the project type VMT screening criterion. Therefore, the project is expected to result in a less-than-significant VMT impact.

1 City of Baldwin Park Staff Report, June 2020.
https://baldwinpark.granicus.com/MetaViewer.php?view_id=10&clip_id=2627&meta_id=245414 2 Per Section 21099 of the California Public Resources Code, a major transit stop is defined as a site containing an existing rail transit station or the intersection of two or more major bus routes with a frequency of service interval of 15 minutes o r less during the morning and afternoon peak commute periods.

APPENDIX D
Water Quality Technical Report
811 W . 7th Street, Suite 200
Los Angeles, CA 90017
(213) 935-1901
www.impactsciences.com

PROJECTS THROUGHOUT CALIFORNIA

MEMORANDUM
To: Melanie Chipres, Associate Planner Job No. 1489-001 From: Eleni Getachew, E N V S P, Planner, Impact Sciences Subject: Fit 7 Sports Lab Water Quality Technical Report Date: October 14, 2024

1. PROJECT LOCATION
The proposed site for the Fit 7 Sports Lab Development Project (Project) would merge two adjacent lots located at 14412 Joanbridge Street (Assessment Parcel Number [APN] 8414-023-011) and 14424 Joanbridge Street (APN 8414-023-010) in the City of Baldwin Park (City) (See Figure 1, Regional Location). The Project Site would be a merged lot. The 14412 Joanbridge Street property is currently paved with a vacant 6,782 square foot building. The 14424 Joanbridge Street is also currently paved with a vacant 5,000 square foot building. The Project Site is located within a developed, urbanized area of the northern perimeter of Baldwin Park’s jurisdiction limits. The Project Site is primarily accessible by East Joanbridge Street, located north of the Project Site.

2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The Project would repurpose the 14412 Joanbridge Street building into a 26,244 square foot, an indoor soccer training facility with a bathroom and gym downstairs and a mezzanine upstairs . The Project would also demolish the existing building located 14424 Joanbridge Street building and construct ground floor parking with covered rooftop soccer fields (See Figure 2, Conceptual Site Plan-Floor 1 and Figure 3, Conceptual Site Plan-Floor 2). On-site landscaping would be limited to the existing planters along the Project Site frontage. Additionally, new shrubs would be planted along the proposed surface parking area. The Project would also plant additional palm trees and shrubs along the Joansbridge Street frontage.

3. EXISTING CONDITIONS
The Project Site currently drains to the existing concrete drainage lines located along East Joanbridge Street; these drains further drain into catch basins located along Maine Avenue. Surface wa ters are then conveyed to the City’s subsurface storm drain system. The runoff from the Project Site is eventually drained into the Los Angeles River watershed, which drains runoff from the eastern, central, and parts of southern Los Angeles County to the mouth of the Los Angeles River in Long Beach.1

1 City of Baldwin Park. General Plan-Health and Sustainability Element. Available online at:
https://www.baldwinpark.com/DocumentCenter/View/568/Health-and-Sustainability-Element-PDF, accessed August 27, 2024.
¯
0 100 20050 Miles
Esri, NASA, NGA, USGS, County of Los Angeles, California State Parks, Esri, HERE, Garmin, SafeGraph, METI/NASA, USGS, Bureau of Land Management, EPA, NPS, USDA City of Baldwin Park
Project Site
Regional Location Map
FIGURE 1
1489.001•01/23
SOURCE: Esri, 2023

PL PL
PLPL
PL
PL
PL
PL
PL
175'-0"
PL
93'-2"
53'-5"

MEN WOMEN

MEETING
ROOM
GYM
ROOM
4'-0"12'-4"
15'-0"
4'-0"18'-0"
28'-7"
5'-0"
9'-4" 10'-6" 7'-11"93'-2"
124'-3"
40'-6"5'-0"
42'-9"
4'-0"
4'-0"
4'-0"
4'-0"
7'-2"

EXISTING BUILDING
55'-9"
8'-1"

EXISTING

ROLL UP
DOOR
PL PL

FIRE TRUCK PATH
26' BY 99'-4"
END OF

FIRE TRUCK
26'-0"
01 02
03 04
05 13
14 15
16 38
21 22
27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35
32'-6"
3'-0"
24'-0"
24'-0"
26'-0"
3'-3"
24'-0"
ADA
9'-0"5'-0"
18'-0"26
14412 JOANBRIDGE St.

INPATH OF TRAVEL

PATH OF TRAVEL OUT
8'-6"
18'-0"
8'-2"
12'-11"
10'-6"
11'-8"
9'-4"
5'-0"
18'-0"
24'-0"
18'-0"
14424 JOANBRIDGE St.
75'-0"
FIRE
HOSE
PATH
75'-0"75'-0"
150' MAX. TO

FIRE TRUCK
75'+75'=150'
150' MAX. TO

FIRE TRUCK
75'+75'=150'
SOCCER COURT 1
8'-6"
75'-0"75'-0"
11 3
3 2
2 12'-0"15'-2"
75'-0"75'-0"
150'-0"
39 8'-6"
18'-0"
06 07
08 19 20
09 10
11 12
36 37
ADA
9'-0"
18'-0"
7 Parking Spaces
32 Parking Spaces25

ELEVATOR
3'-0"
8'-6"
5'-0"
3'-0"

DECK EDGE ABOVE
M.RRW.RR
HALL
12'-6"
4'-0"7'-1"12'-6"
11'-6"
17 18
6'-0"
16'-0"
5'-0"
23 24
5'-0"
44 Lot Size: 13,122 sq.ft.
14412 + 14424 JOANBRIDGE St.

Parking = 39 Spaces
Lot Size: 13,122 sq.ft.
25'-3"
26'-6"
5'-0"5'-0" to PL

1. VENDING MACHINE

EPEX BEVERAGE
COMBO 32d x 35w x 77 h
1 TRASH ENCLOSURE
Trinidad Campbell
Design & Building
3829 Ronda Vista Pl. Los Angeles, CA. 90027
(323)497-9969
[email protected]
Project Number
Date
Drawn By
Scale
FIT 7 LAB
14412 & 14424 JOANBRIDGE St.

BALDWIN PARK
LOS ANGELES, CA 91706
Architect
Alejandro Resendiz
52 Carrige Way. Pomona, CA. 91766
(909)456-4506
[email protected]
MAY 25/2023
A-1.1
GLRS
2210 BAL

FIRST FLOOR
PLAN
1/8" = 1'-0" 1/8" = 1'-0"1 GROUND FLOOR PLAN
N
12/19/2022
Conceptual Site Plan - Floor 1
FIGURE 2
1489.001•10/23
SOURCE: Trinidad Campbell, 2022

175'-0"
175'-0"
75'-0"
75'-0"
PL
PLPL
75'-0"
PL PL
PL
7'-6"
8'-4"7'-7"
7'-6"
6'-0"
3'-6" 7'-11"30'-93
4"
13'-4"
13'-2"
10'-83
4"
11'-6"
10'-83
4" 22'-103
4"
10'-33
4"
10'-33
4"
OFFICE 3 OFFICE 4
OFFICE 1 OFFICE 2

RR KITCHEN
PL PL
3'-0"
4'-0"
3'-0"
3'-0"
53'-7"
31'-73
4"
4'-0" 4'-0"
8'-0"
6'-0"48'-7" 48'-7" 6'-0" 48'-7"
55'-10"4'-0"
26'-8"
5'-0"
SOCCER FIELD 2
SOCCER FIELD 3 SOCCER FIELD 4 SOCCER FIELD 5
NET
NET
NET
31'-7"
26'-0"
53'-5"
94'-1"
55'-10" 4'-0"
4'-0"
150'-0"
75'-0"
14412 JOANBRIDGE St.

LOT SIZE = 13,222 sq.ft
14424 JOANBRIDGE St.

LOT SIZE = 13,222 sq.ft
UPPER FLOOR +12'-6" @ +12'6"
4 SOCCER FIELDS
WITH NET ABOVE @ +25'
11 3
3 2
2 4'-0"
3'-0"
28'-7"
54'-10"
55'-10"4'-0"
4'-0"
55'-73
4"
46'-101
2"15'-0"47'-11"
14'-8"
1 2 Diagonal =
Steps to be no more than
93'-4" separate

ELEVATOR
8'-6"
3'-0" 10'-0" 52'-0"
5'-0"
108'-7"
218'-2" 44
TOTAL 1st floor plan = 6,625 sq ft
TOTAL MEZZANINE = 1,650 sq ft
2,314 sq ft
1,586 sq ft
3,410 sq ft 3,438 sq ft 3,770 sq ft
6,625 sq ft

TOTAL CONCRETE UPPER
SLAB ON 14412; 14424=
14,518 sq.ft.
5'-0"

MEETING
ROOM
5'-0" to PL
5'-0" to PL
Trinidad Campbell
Design & Building
3829 Ronda Vista Pl. Los Angeles, CA. 90027
(323)497-9969
[email protected]
Project Number
Date
Drawn By
Scale
FIT 7 LAB
14412 & 14424 JOANBRIDGE St.

BALDWIN PARK
LOS ANGELES, CA 91706
Architect
Alejandro Resendiz
52 Carrige Way. Pomona, CA. 91766
(909)456-4506
[email protected]
MAY 25/2023
A-1.2
GLRS
2210 BAL

SECOND FLOOR
PLAN
1/8" = 1'-0"
N
1/8" = 1'-0"1 SECOND FLOOR PLAN
N
12/19/2022
Conceptual Site Plan - Floor 2
FIGURE 3
1489.001•10/23
SOURCE: Trinidad Campbell, 2022

Impact Sciences, Inc. 5 Fit 7 Sports Lab Development Project 1250.007 October 2024
The Basin Plan for the Coastal Watersheds of Los Angeles and Ventura Counties (Basin Plan) establishes the water quality regulations and programs to implement the regulations for the Los Angeles and Ventura counties. The Basin Plan identifies beneficial uses for surface and ground waters, identifies narrative and numerical water quality objectives for regional attainment, and describes implementation programs and other necessary actions to achieve water quality objectives. According to the Basin Plan, the Project Site is located within the Coastal Plain of Los Angeles Basin (Central Basin).
2 4. WATER QUALITY STANDARDS
The Clean Water Act (CWA) was adopted to restore and maintain the chemical, physical, and biological integrity of the nation’s waters. The CWA directs each state to establish water quality standards for all “water of the United States.” Pursuant to Section 404 of the CWA (33 U.S. Code [USC] §1251 et seq), the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) is authorized to regulate any activity that would result in the discharge of dredged or fill material into waters of the United States(including wetlands), which include those wat ers listed in 33 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 328.3 (as amended at 80 Federal Register [FR] 37104, June 29, 2015). With oversight from the United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EP A), the USACE has the principal authority to issue CWA Section 404 permits. The USACE would require a Standard Individual Permit (SIP) for more than minimal impacts to waters of the United States as determined by the USACE. Projects with minimal individual and cumulative adverse effects on the environment may meet the conditions of an existing Nationwide Permit (NWP). Pursuant to Section 401 (a)(1) of the CWA, the U.S. EP A has delegated the oversight of the 401 -certification process in California State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) and nine Regional Water Quality Control Boards (RWQCBs). The SWRCB establishes statewide policies and regulations for implementing water quality control programs.

The National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit Program was established in the Clean Water Act to regulate discharges of pollutants into the surface waters of the United States. Both point source discharges (such as a municipal or industrial discharge at a specific location or pipe) and nonpoint source discharges (such as diffuse runoff of surface water from streets and parking lots) are regulated by the NPDES Permit Program. Municipalities, publicly owned treatment works, and most indust ries in the U.S. are now required to obtain an NPDES permit for discharges, including stormwater runoff. NPDES permits the regulated discharge of “pollutants from point sources to waters of the United States” to ensure that the discharges do not adversely affect surface water quality or beneficial uses.

In addition, construction activities that may result in waterborne erosion from grading or stockpiling are regulated through various techniques called “best management practices” (BMPs). Water quality management plans and stormwater pollution prevention plans are required for development projects to meet the requirements of the NPDES Program to maintain water quality. As such, under this Program, projects that disturb more than one acre during construction are required to file a notice of intent and obtain coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Permit for Storm Water Discharges Associated with Construction and Land Disturbance Activities Order 2009- 0009-DWQ (as amended by Order 2010- 0014-DWQ and Order 2012- 0006-DWQ) or the Construction Stormwater General Permit (Construction General Permit). Construction activities subject to this permit include clearing, grading, stockpiling, or excavation. Because Project construction activities would disturb the less than one acre of land, the Project would not be required to obtain coverage under the NPDES Construction General Permit The RWQCBs develop and implement Water Quality Control Plans (Basin Plans) that consider regional beneficial uses, water quality characteristics, and water quality problems. Each Basin Plan also provides strategies and implementation plans for the control of pollutants, remediation of pollution, monitoring, and assessment of the region’s waters. Locally, the protection of water quality in the Los Angeles River is under the jurisdiction of the Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board (LARWQCB). The Board establishes requirements prescribing the discharge limits and establishes water quality objectives through the Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Basin River Basin. Water quality

2 Los Angeles County Regional Control Board. Basin Plan for the Coastal Watersheds of Los Angeles and Ventura Counties.

Available online at: https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/losangeles/water_issues/programs/basin_plan/basin_plan_documentat ion.html, accessed August 27, 2024.

Impact Sciences, Inc. 6 Fit 7 Sports Lab Development Project 1250.007 October 2024
characteristics typically measured include pH, total dissolved solids, levels of herbicides and pesticides, sediment levels, vehicle-related oils, and chemicals such as chloride, sulfate, and nitrate. Water quality objectives are established based on the designated beneficial uses for a particular surface water or groundwater basin. Beneficial uses of water resources include habitat, municipal domestic water supply, agricultural supply, groundwater recharge, fishing, and water contact recreation.

Additionally, the NPDES Program includes long-term regulation of stormwater discharges from medium and large cities through the Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) Permit. The City of Baldwin Park is a co -permittee of the LARWQCB Regional Phase I MS4 Permit, adopted in 2021. 3 Under this MS4, each permitted municipality is required to prepare and implement a project -specific Stormwater Quality Management Plan (SWQMP). Additionally, all development projects are required to comply with the permit's Low -Impact Development (LID) req uirements by submitting an LID
Plan. The LID Plan must outline the design and implementation measure s of the project’s post - construction controls that would mitigate stormwater pollution prior to completion of the development project.

Additionally, under Section VI.D.8 of the Los Angeles County MS4 Permit, the Development Construction Program requires permittees to enforce the implementation of Best Management Practices (BMPs), including, but not limited to, approval of an Erosion and Sediment Control Plan (ESCP) for all construction activities within their jurisdiction. SCPs are required to include the elements of a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), which are required to include BMPs that will reduce pollution in stormwater discharges to the Best Available Technology Economically Achievable/Best Conventional Pollutant Control Technology standards. These regulations are applicable to development projects that would disturb less than one acre of land.

With respect to water quality during the operations of all development, Section VI.D.7 of the Los Angeles County MS4 Permit, Planning and Land Development Program, is applicable to, among others, land-disturbing activities that result in the creation or addition or replacement of 5,000 square feet or more of impervious surface area on an already developed site, which would apply to the Project. This Program requires, among other things, that the Project runoff volume from the following be retained on-site: (a) the 0.75 inch, 24-hour rain event; or (b) the 85th percentile, 24-hour rain event, as determined from the Los Angeles County 85th percentile precipitation isohyetal map, whichever is greater.

The LARWQCB's Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) is designed to preserve and enhance water quality and protect the beneficial uses of all regional waters. The Basin Plan designates beneficial uses for surface and ground waters and sets qualitative and numerical objectives that must be attained or maintained to protect the designated beneficial uses and conform to the state's anti -degradation policy. The Basin Plan is a resource for implementation programs that protect all waters in the region. The Basin Plan implements a number of state and federal laws, including the California Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act and Clean Water Act. The Basin Plan also includes compliance with the Standard Urban Storm Water Mitigation Plan (SUSMP) requirements to reduce potential water quality impacts.

Developers must incorporate appropriate SUSMP requirements into project plans. The LARWQCB approves project plans as part of the development plan approval process prior to issuing grading or building permits for projects covered by the SUSMP requirements. All projects that fall into one of the following categories require a SUSMP to address stormwater pollution:
• Single-Family Hillside Residences;
• 100,000 Square Foot Commercial Developments;
• Automotive Repair Shops;
• Retail Gasoline Outlet;
• Restaurants;
• Home Subdivisions with 10 to 99 housing units; and

3 California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Regional Phase I MS4 NPDES Permit. Adopted July 23, 2021.

Available online at: https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/rwqcb4/water_issues/programs/stormwater/municipal/public_docs/20 22/1_Order(ACC-RPSignature).pdf, accessed August 26, 2024.

Impact Sciences, Inc. 7 Fit 7 Sports Lab Development Project 1250.007 October 2024
• Home Subdivisions with 100 or more housing units.

This Program requires, among other things, that the Project runoff volume from the following be retained on-site:
• The 0.75 inch, 24-hour rain event; or
• The 85th percentile, 24-hour rain event, as determined from the Los Angeles County 85th percentile precipitation isohyetal map, whichever is greater.

The Regional Board Executive Officer designated two additional categories subject to SUSMP requirements for the Los Angeles County MS4 Permit. These categories are:
• Location within or directly adjacent to or discharging directly to an Environmentally Sensitive Area (i.e., a river); or • Parking lots that are approximately 5,000 square feet.

A significant impact on water quality may occur if a project would substantially alter drainage patterns, resulting in a significant increase in erosion or siltation during the construction or operation of a project or if discharges associated with the pro posed Project would create pollution, contamination or nuisance as defined in Section 13050 of the California Water Code (CWC) or that cause regulatory standards to be violated, as defined in the applicable NPDES stormwater permit or Basin Plan for the receiving water body. In addition, for the purpose of this specific issue, a significant impact may occur if the volume of stormwater runoff from the Project Site were to increase to a level that exceeds the capacity of the storm drain system serving the Project Site. A significant adverse effect would also occur if the Project substantially increased the probability that polluted runoff would reach the storm drain system.

Under the City of Baldwin Park, development projects are regulated locally to minimize impacts on the city's existing water quality. Chapter 52 (Storm Water and Urban Runoff Pollution Prevention) outlines regulations for development projects to protect and improve the water quality of receiving waters. These regulations are intended to reduce illicit discharges to the municipal stormwater system to the maximum extent practicable, eliminate spillage, dumping, and disposal of pollutant materials into the municipal stormwater system, and reduce pollutant loads in stormwater and urban runoff.

5. PROJECT IMPACTS
Construction Impacts
Construction activities associated with the Project would include demolition, site preparation, and excavating/grading that would disturb the approximately 21,626 square feet of the Project Site. As a result, waste discharge would occur and may consist of oil and grease, trash, heavy metals and pathogens as well as other pollutants. Further, construction activities associated with the Project have the potential to degrade water quality through the exposure of surface runoff (primarily rainfall) to exposed soils, dust, and other debris, as well as from runoff from construction equipment.

As stated above, the Project construction activities would disturb the less than one acre of land and therefore would not be required to obtain coverage under the NPDES Construction General Permit. However, the Project would be required to comply with the Los Angeles County MS4 Permit requirements and NPDES Permit No. CAS004001, Order No. R4-2012-0175 and implement BMPs to minimize the potential pollution to the City’s stormwater drainage system.

The BMPs can include but are not limited to:
• Disposing of waste in accordance with all applicable laws and regulations; • cleaning up leaks, drips, and spills immediately; conducting street sweeping during construction activities; • limiting the amount of soil exposed at any given time; covering trucks; • keeping construction equipment in good working order; and • installing sediment filters during construction activities.

Impact Sciences, Inc. 8 Fit 7 Sports Lab Development Project 1250.007 October 2024
The Project would also be required to prepare and submit an ESCP , further outlining the proposed erosion control measures the Project Applicant would implement during construction.

The ESCP would be subject to review and approval by the City of Baldwin Park, Engineering department. The Project would be required to comply with all applicable regulations outlined in Chapter 52 of the Municipal Code. Section

52.12 (Control of Pollutants from Other Construction Activities) of the Municipal Code would require all construction activities associated with the Project that involve excavation, grading, and pavement to be compliant with the Los Angeles County MS4 Permit requirements. Upon approval of the ESCP , th e Project’s adherence with the regional requirements during the construction phase would result in less than significant short -term construction impacts to water quality.

Operational Impacts
Long-term operation of the proposed soccer facility would similarly have the potential to impact drainage systems due to pollutants in stormwater runoff (sediment runoff) that could have the potential to affect tributary drainage features.

The Project would continue to use the existing storm drainage system on -site to off-set stormwater and pollution. As such, the Project would be required to comply with the Los Angeles County MS4 Permit requirements and NPDES Permit No. CAS004001, Order No. R4 -2021-0105 and prepare a project -specific LID Plan. The LID Plan would identify structural and non -structural BMPs to minimize potential water quality issues related to new development, hydromodification, and identification of receiving waters. Potential BMPs include, but would not be limited to, implementing filtration systems and storm drain inserts and maintenance programs to remove trash, debris, and waste.

Additionally, to demonstrate compliance with the Basin Plan, the Project would be required to prepare and implement a SUSMP that would outline all Project-related BMPs. These same BMPs would meet LARWQCB’s standards.

Following compliance with applicable laws and regulations, including compliance with the LARWQCB’s SUSMP , the preparation of a project -specific LID Plan (as required under the MS4 Permit), and implementation of recommended BMPs therein, long-term water quality impacts would be less than significant.

As stated above, the Project Site is located within the Central Basin. The Project would implement a SUSMP that would adhere to the Basin Plan’s requirements for BMPs. As a mostly paved site, the Project Site is mostly impervious, and the site’s impervious area under the Project would be similar to existing conditions. Thus, Project implementation would not result in new impervious surfaces that could increase stormwater runoff and decrease the amount of water recharged to the groundwater system within the confines of the 25,600 -square-foot Project Site. Furthermore, the Project Site is relatively small in size, and the Project Design would include pervious landscaped areas along the perimeters of the site. Thus, the Project is not anticipated to substantially deplete groundwater supplies or impede sustainable groundwater management of the basin.

As stated, the Project Site is located outside of a 100 -year flood hazard area and is located within an area identified as having little chance of flooding. Moreover, the Project is not of a size or scale that would have the potential to impede or redirect flood flows.

Conclusion
As discussed above, construction and operation of the Project would not substantially alter drainage patterns, result in a significant increase in erosion or siltation, or cause regulatory standards to be violated. In addition, the volume of stormwater runoff from the Project Site would not increase to a level that exceeds the capacity of the storm drain system serving the Project Site. The Project also would not substantially increase the probability that polluted runoff would reach the storm drain system. Adherence to regional and local regulations would ensure that any impacts of Project-related impacts to stormwater runoff water quality would be less than significant.

Impact Sciences, Inc. 9 Fit 7 Sports Lab Development Project 1250.007 October 2024

6. REFERENCES
City of Baldwin Park. General Plan-Health and Sustainability Element. Available online at:
https://www.baldwinpark.com/DocumentCenter/View/568/Health-and-Sustainability-Element-PDF, accessed August 27, 2024.

Los Angeles County Regional Control Board. Basin Plan for the Coastal Watersheds of Los Angeles and Ventura Counties. Available online at: https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/losangeles/water_issues/progra ms/basin_plan/basin_plan_documentation.html, accessed August 27, 2024.

California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Regional Phase I MS4 NPDES Permit. Adopted July 23, 2021.

Available online at: https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/rwqcb4/water_issues/programs/stormw ater/municipal/public_docs/2022/1_Order(ACC-RPSignature).pdf, accessed August 26, 2024. ...

Designer
Date
01/08/2024
Scale
Not to Scale
Drawing No.

Summary
1 of 1
Statistics
Description Symbol Avg Max Min Max/Min Avg/Min
_
SOCCER 1-3 22 .8 fc 52.7 fc 12.3 fc 4.3:1 1.9:1
_SOCCER 4 23.7 fc 52.2 fc 5.1 fc 10.2:1 4.6:1
PL1-3 EAST 0.1 fc 0.1 fc 0.0 fc N/A N/A
PL1-3 SOUTH 0.0 fc 0.1 fc 0.0 fc N/A N/A
PL1-3 WEST 0.1 fc 0.1 fc 0.0 fc N/A N/A
PL4 NORTH 0.0 fc 0.1 fc 0.0 fc N/A N/A
PL4 WEST 0.0 fc 0.1 fc 0.0 fc N/A N/A
Current View
...

Designer
Date
01/08/2024
Scale
Not to Scale
Drawing No.

Summary
1 of 1
Current View
...

Designer
Date
01/08/2024
Scale
Not to Scale
Drawing No.

Summary
1 of 1
Current View
Statistics
Description Symbol Avg Max Min Max/Min Avg/Min
_S
OCCER 1-3 21.8 fc 43.1 fc 10.9 fc 4.0:1 2.0:1
_S
OCCER 4 21.5 fc 44.7 fc 5.8 fc 7.7:1 3.7:1
PL1-3 EAST 0.1 fc 0.1 fc 0.0 fc N/A N/A
PL1-3 SOUTH 0.1 fc 0.1 fc 0.0 fc N/A N/A
PL1-3 WEST 0.1 fc 0.1 fc 0.0 fc N/A N/A
PL4 NORTH 0.1 fc 0.1 fc 0.0 fc N/A N/A
PL4 WEST 0.0 fc 0.1 fc 0.0 fc N/A N/A
...

Designer
Date
01/08/2024
Scale
Not to Scale
Drawing No.

Summary
1 of 1
Current View