Agenda packet, regular meeting, third session — Banning City Council, March 26, 2024 (part 3 of 3)

RESOLUTION 2024-52

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BANNING, CALIFORNIA,

ADOPTING AN AMENDMENT TO THE COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT AND FEE

GROUP SCHEDULE OF THE MASTER USER FEE SCHEDULE TO AMEND FEES AND

CHARGES FOR CERTAIN PARKS AND RECREATION PROGRAMS, AND MAKING A

DETERMINATION OF EXEMPTION UNDER CEQA
WHEREAS, The City has not modified the Community Services Department and Fee Group schedule within the Master User Fee Schedule since 2019; and WHEREAS, direct variable program costs have increased significantly since the City Council’s adoption of the Master User Fee Schedule in 2019; and WHEREAS, the City desires to charge fees for services that are reasonably borne from specific programs; and
WHEREAS, the Parks and Recreation Department has set a cost recovery goal of 100% cost recovery of direct variable program costs” for swimming pool operations, swim lessons, youth sports league operations, and day camp programs; and
WHEREAS, direct variable program costs include all program specific costs that would be eliminated if the specific program did not operate; and WHEREAS, the direct variable program costs include all applicable direct program costs including, without limitation, direct staffing costs, and program supplies, including uniforms, awards, officials, and all other direct program supplies; WHEREAS, Section 66018 of the Mitigation Fee Act (Gov. Code, § 66000 et seq.) authorizes the City to impose fees for parks and recreation program services, provided the City hold a public hearing, at which oral or written presentations can be made, as part of a regularly scheduled meeting; and
WHEREAS, City staff have prepared a fee analysis, as set forth in the corresponding March 26, 2024 regular City Council meeting staff report, that demonstrates that the proposed new fees do not exceed the estimated reasonable cost of providing the services for which the fees are levied; and
WHEREAS, on March 26, 2024, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing to consider the adoption of an amendment to the Community Services Department and Fee Group schedule of the Master User Fee Schedule to adopt amended fees and charges related to certain parks and recreation programs; and
WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites prior to adoption of this Resolution have occurred.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Banning as follows:

SECTION 1. The findings and recitals set forth above are true and correct and are incorporated herein.
643
Resolution 2024-52

Page 2 of 6 ends

SECTION 2. CEQA Findings. City staff has evaluated the potential environmental impacts of the adoption of the proposed amendments to the Community Services Department and Fee Group of the Master User Fee Schedule pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”). The proposed actions do not constitute a “project” under CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(4) because these actions involve the creation of a government funding mechanism which does not involve any commitment to any specific project which may result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment. In addition, these actions are statutorily exempt from CEQA under CEQA Guidelines Section 15273(a)(1) because these actions are establishing fees and charges to meet operating expenses, including employee wage rates and fringe benefits. The City Council has reviewed the administrative record concerning the proposed actions and the proposed CEQA determination, and based on its own independent judgment, finds that the proposed actions set forth in this Resolution are not subject to, or exempt from, the requirements of the CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15378(b)(4) and 15273(a)(1).

SECTION 3. Adoption of Amended User Fees and Services Charges for Certain Parks and Recreation Programs. The City Council hereby approves and adopts the following amended parks and recreation program user fees and service charges for the following City department and fee group: Community Services Department:

Municipal Pool
# Description Current
Fee/Charge
Unit Notes Operation
Cost
Cost
Recovery
%
Suggested
Fee
%
+/-
1 Admissions
1a Open Swim
sessions Adults
$3.00 per
person
$3.58 97.8% $3.50
1b Open Swim
sessions
Children/Seniors
$1.50 per
person
$3.58 70.1% $2.50
2 Lessons
2a Resident $45.00 per
person
$51.43 97.2% $50.00
2a Resident
2b Non-Resident $50.00 per
person
$56.43 97.4 % $55.00
Activities
1 Youth Flag
Football,
Basketball, &
Soccer
$40.00 per
session/
per
child
$64.37 –
$69.47
86% to
93%
$60.00
2 Day Camp $60.00 per
child/
per
week
$94.28 85% $80.00
SECTION 4. Methodology for Calculation, Adjustment, and Collection of User Fees and Service Charges. The user fees and service charges amended in Section 3 of this Resolution are hereby adopted, and shall be calculated, adjusted, and collected in accordance with City ordinances. 644
Resolution 2024-52

Page 3 of 6 ends

The amount of the user fees and service charges may be adjusted annually for inflation on July 1st of each year by the percentage change in the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U): Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario (or any successor index). The calculation for that annual adjustment shall be made using the month of April over the month of April in the prior year.

SECTION 5. Effective Date of Amended User Fees and Service Charges. The user fees and service charges established in Section 3 of this Resolution shall be effective on the sixtieth (60th) day following the adoption of this Resolution.

SECTION 6. Repeal of Prior User Fees and Service Charges Adopted by Conflicting Resolutions. Any and all provisions of prior resolutions of the City Council establishing or modifying the user fees and service charges in the categories set forth in Section 3 of this Resolution, which duplicate or conflict with the provisions of this Resolution, are hereby repealed and replaced with the fees and charges set forth in Section 3 of this Resolution and the terms and conditions established by this Resolution upon the effective date of the new user fees and service charges as provided for in Section 5 of this Resolution.

SECTION 7. Severability. If any section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause, or phrase of this Resolution or any part hereof is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Resolution or any part thereof. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed each section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause, or phrase hereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause, or phrase be declared invalid or unconstitutional.

SECTION 8. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution and shall cause the certified Resolution to be filed in the book of original resolutions.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 26th day of March, 2024.

Alberto Sanchez, Mayor
City of Banning
ATTEST:

Caroline Patton, Administrative City Clerk
City of Banning
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Serita R. Young, City Attorney
Richards, Watson & Gershon
645
Resolution 2024-52

Page 4 of 6 ends

CERTIFICATION:

I, Caroline Patton, Administrative City Clerk of the City of Banning, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution 2024-52, was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Banning, California, at a regular meeting thereof held on the 26th day of March 2024 by the following vote, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Caroline Patton, Administrative City Clerk
City of Banning, California
646
Resolution 2024-52

Page 5 of 6 ends

Exhibit A
Direct Program Cost Breakdown
647
Resolution 2024-52

Page 6 of 6 ends

Exhibit B
Local City Program Fee Comparison
648
Exhibit A - City of Banning Parks and Recreation - Direct Program cost breakdown 2022/23 Participation Revenue Staff Exp
Op/supply
Exp Tot Exp Net Cost
100 % CR
Fee Current Fee Proposed Fee
300 $12,000.00 $7,913.00 $11,398.13 $19,311.13 -$7,311.13 $64.37 $40.00 $60.00 125 $5,000.00 $4,083.00 $4,601.13 $8,684.13 -$3,684.13 $69.47 $40.00 $60.00 9000 Child /
Senior
3000 Adult $22,500.00 $42,490.00 $500.00 $42,990.00 -$20,490.00 $3.58 $1.50 child /
Senior $3
Adult
$2.50 Child /
Senior
$3.50 Adult
600 $27,875.00 $30,360.00 $500.00 $30,860.00 -$2,985.00 $51.43 $45 / $50 NR $50 / $55 NR 450 $27,000.00 $39,424.00 $3,000.00 $42,424.00 -$15,424.00 $94.28 $60.00 $80.00 Note 2 :Open Rec Fee - Current avg fee - $1.88 - Proposed fee average $2.75 Note 3 : Day Camp Fee proposal - Subcommitte recommended Between $80 and $90 per session Note 1 : Youth Sports - Value added with new fee - Sponsorships and Memory Mate picture package Program
Youth Basketball
Youth Flag Football
Open Rec Swim
Swim Lessons
Day Camp
649
22500 1.875
10500
33000 2.75
650
City
Resident / nonresident Youth Sports Day Camp per weekSwim Lessons 2 week session Open swim Lap Swim
Apple Valley $5 $73.00 $139 FT $91 3 day $42.00 $2.50 kids $4 adults $4.00 Beaumont No $225.00 N/A N/A N/A N/A
Bloomington No $85.00 $120.00 N/A N/A N/A
Blythe No $40.00 N/A N/A N/A N/A
Desert
Recreation
District Yes $125.00 $140 per week
Res- $$62.50
Non Res - $72.50 $3 child / $4 Adult $3 child / $4 Adult Fontana Yes, varied
Resident- $73, Non
Res- $88 $105.00 Resident- $52, Non- $67 $5 to $7 Resident-$3, Non-$5 Hemet No $60.00 $65.00 Adult - $10, Youth- $9 N/A
Moreno Valley Yes $115.00 $135.00 N/A N/A N/A
Palm Springs Yes $95.00 N/A N/A N/A
Rancho
Cucamonga Yes, varied
Resident: $169,
Non: $183
Resident- $168, Non-
$182 N/A N/A N/A
Redlands No $85.00 $99.00 N/A N/A N/A
San Jacinto No $60.00 N/A N/A N/A
Twentynine
Palms No $53.00 $175 2-weeks $48.83 $3 kids / $4.25 Adults $3 kids / $4.25 Adults Victorville $5 $65.00 $120 FT $86 Half day $46.00 $3 all $3.00 Valley Wide No $70.00 $100 to $150 N/A N/A N/A
Yucca Valley Yes $75.00 $80.00 $56.00 N/A N/A
Banning
Yes - Swim
Lesson +$5 $40.00 $60.00 $45.00 $1.50 Kid $3 adult $3.00 Banning
Proposed Fees Yes $5 to $10 $60.00 $80.00 $50.00 $2.50 child - $3.50 adult $3.50 adult Note: Banning Little League - $125 to $150 for 2024 baseball/softball season Exhibit B - Local City Fee Comparison -- 2022-2023
651
City of Banning
Public Notice and Summary of Ordinance 1602
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Banning will consider the adoption of the proposed Ordinance 1602 on Tuesday, March 26, 2024, at 5:00 p.m., or soon thereafter, in the Banning Council Chambers, 99 E. Ramsey Street, Banning, California.

SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE 1602

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BANNING, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTIONS 3.36.020 AND 3,36,080 (C) OF CHAPTER 3.86 (FEE AND SERVICE CHARGE REVENUE) OF TITLE 3 (REVENUE AND FINANCE) OF THE

BANNING MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADD A DEFINITION OF DIRECT VARIABLE

COSTS, AMEND THE COST RECOVERY PERCENTAGE OF CERTAIN PARKS

AND RECREATION PROGRAM FEES, AND MAKING A DETERMINATION OF

EXEMPTION FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT This is a summary of the above-entitled Ordinance 1602. This summary has been prepared and published in accordance with the requirements of Government Code Section 36933.

On March 26, 2024, City Staff will recommend that the City Council of the City of Banning Introduce and conduct the first reading of Ordinance 1602 modifying Chapter

3.36 (Fee and Service Charge Revenue/Cost Comparison) of Title 3 (Revenue and Finance).

Ordinance 1602 recommends amending Chapter 3.36.020 by Adding the definition of “Direct Variable Program Costs” as follows:
“Direct Variable Program Costs” means all applicable direct variable costs that would be eliminated if a program did not operate, including to but not limited to salaries, wages, fringe benefits, program specific supplies for program operation and maintenance, officials and other direct expenses incurred.

Ordinance 1602 also recommends amending the Cost Recovery Table C in Section

3.36.080 (Schedule of fees and service charges) for Parks and Recreation Services to reflect a goal of 100% cost recovery of Direct Variable Program Costs for Number S57(Swimming Pool Public Oper; S-58 (Swim Lessons); S-60-Youth Sports League Operations and S-69 – Day Camps
To observe the meeting, members of the public are invited to attend the Banning City Council meeting in person or to observe the live meeting through your personal computer you may use your computer or smart phone to enter the following or click on the link: https://banninglive.viebit.com or on the Banning Government Channel on Cable Television.

Submitted by:
_________________________
Caroline Patton, Deputy City Clerk
City of Banning, California
Dated: March 11, 2024
Publish Date: March X, 2024 and March X, 2024
652
RESOLUTION 2019- 13

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

BANNING, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE

COMPREHENSIVE USER FEE STUDY REPORT DATED
JANUARY 2, 2019, ADOPTING AN UPDATED MASTER

USER FEE SCHEDULE FOR THE FOLLOWING CITY
DEPARTMENTS AND FEE GROUPS: FINANCE AND
ADMINISTRATION; ANIMAL CONTROL; COMMUNITY
SERVICES; AIRPORT; BUILDING; PLANNING; UTILITY
BILLING; ELECTRIC UTILITY; POLICE; FIRE; AND

ENGINEERING, MAKING A FINDING OF EXEMPTION

UNDER CEQA, AND REPEALING PROVISIONS OF

RESOLUTIONS ESTABLISHING OR MODIFYING USER

FEES AND SERVICE CHARGES
WHEREAS, in adopting Chapter 3.6 of Title 3 of the Banning Municipal Code ( the Municipal Code"), the City Council of the City of Banning ( the " City Council" of the "City") established the requirement for the ascertainment and recovery of costs reasonably borne, from fees and charges levied therefore, in providing the regulation, products, and services enumerated in Chapter 3. 36;
WHEREAS, Section 3.6. 040 of the Municipal Code directs the City Manager to annually/ seasonally review fees and charges to recover the percentage of costs reasonably borne in providing the regulation, products or services enumerated in Chapter

3.6 and recommend changes to the City Council for adoption; WHEREAS, the fees set forth in the Section 3.6. 080 of the Municipal Code are less than the City' scurrent cost of providing: development services ( including planning related services, such as zoning variances, zoning changes, use permits, building inspections, building permits, the processing of maps under the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act ( Gov. Code, § 66410 et seq.), and planning services under the authority of Chapter 3 (" Local Planning") of Division 1 of Title 7 of the Government Code 65100 et seq.) or under any other authority); public safety services; parks and recreation services; utility and enterprise services; maintenance services; and finance and administrative services;
WHEREAS, Section 66014 of the Mitigation Fee Act (Gov. Code, § 66000 et seq.) authorizes the City to impose fees for zoning variances, zoning changes, use permits, building inspections, building permits, the processing of maps under the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act ( Gov. Code, § 66410 et seq.), and planning services under the authority of Chapter 3 (" Local Planning") of Division 1 of Title 7 of the Government Code 65100 et seq.) or under any other authority, provided those fees do not exceed the estimated reasonable cost of providing the service for which the fee is charged; 1 653
WHEREAS, Section 66013 of the Mitigation Fee Act further authorizes the City to impose fees for water or sewer connections provided those fees do not exceed the estimated reasonable cost of providing the service for which the fee is charged; WHEREAS, the Mitigation Fee Act requires that the City prepare a fee study that complies with Government Code Section 66016, and demonstrates that the proposed new fees and increases in existing fees do not exceed the estimated amount required to provide the services for which the fees are levied;
WHEREAS, Willdan Finance Services has prepared the Comprehensive User Fee Study Report dated January 2, 2019 ( the " User Fee Study'). The User Fee Study sets forth the methodologies for determining the estimated amount required to provide certain regulations, products, and services for which the proposed user fees and service charges will be levied ( see page 8), describes the amount of cost, or estimated cost, required to provide certain regulations, products, and services for which the proposed user fees or service charges will be levied ( see Appendix A) and the revenue sources anticipated to provide the regulations, products, and services, including General Fund revenues ( see pages 10- 11), and otherwise satisfies the requirements of the law and the Mitigation Fee Act, with regard to the imposition and collection of certain user fees and service charges; WHEREAS, the City has made the User Fee Study available for public inspection and has published and mailed notices of the public hearing to consider the adoption of the proposed updated Master Fee Schedule in accordance with the Mitigation Fee Act; WHEREAS, Section 66016( b) of the Mitigation Fee Act provides that any action by a local agency to levy a new fee or service charge or to approve an increase in an existing fee or service charge shall be taken only by ordinance or resolution; WHEREAS, on September 10, 2019, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing to consider proposed amendments to BMC Chapter 3. 36, the approval of a Comprehensive User Fee Study Report prepared by Willdan Financial Services and dated January 2, 2019, and the adoption of an updated Master User Fee Schedule for the following City departments and fee groups: Finance and Administration; Animal Control; Community Services; Airport; Building; Planning; Utility Billing; Electric Utility; Police; Fire; and Engineering. Following the receipt of testimony, the City Council continued the matter off -calendar and forwarded the proposed updated Master User Fee Schedule to the Council' s Budget & Finance Committee for further review and recommendations;
WHEREAS, on October 22, 2019, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing to consider proposed amendments to BMC Chapter 3. 36, the approval of a Comprehensive User Fee Study Report prepared by Willdan Financial Services and dated January 2, 2019, and the adoption of an updated Master User Fee Schedule for the following City departments and fee groups: Finance and Administration; Animal Control; Community Services; Airport; Building; Planning; Utility Billing; Electric Utility; Police; Fire; and Engineering. Following the receipt of testimony, and upon staff' recommendation, the City Council again forwarded the proposed updated Master User 2 654
Fee Schedule to the Council' sBudget & Finance Committee for further review and recommendations;
WHEREAS, on December 10, 2019, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing to consider proposed amendments to Municipal Code Chapter 3. 36, the approval of the User Fee Study, and the adoption of an updated Master User Fee Schedule for the following City departments and fee groups: Finance and Administration; Animal Control; Community Services; Airport; Building; Planning; Utility Billing; Electric Utility; Police; Fire; and Engineering; and
WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.

NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Banning does hereby resolve, determine, find, and order as follows:

SECTION 1: ADOPTION AND INCORPORATION OF RECITALS
The findings and recitals set forth above are true and correct, and are incorporated herein.

SECTION 2: ENVIRONMENTAL EXEMPTION
The adoption of Ordinance No. 1553, the User Fee Study, and the proposed user fees and service charges specified in this Resolution, was reviewed in accordance with the criteria contained in the California Environmental Quality Act (" CEQA") and the State CEQA Guidelines. The City Council finds that adoption of Ordinance No. 1553, the User Fee Study, and the proposed user fees and service charges specified in this Resolution do not constitute a " project" under CEQA pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15378( b)( 4) because these actions involve the creation of a government funding mechanism which does not involve any commitment to any specific project which may result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment. In addition, the City Council finds that these actions are statutorily exempt from CEQA under CEQA Guidelines Sections 15273( a)( 1) and ( a)( 2) because these actions are establishing fees to meet operating expenses, including employee wage rates and fringe benefits, and to purchase and/ or lease supplies, equipment, and materials. The City Council hereby directs City staff to file the Notice of Exemption, attached to this Resolution as Exhibit B, with the County Clerk pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15062 within five ( 5) days of the date that this Resolution is adopted.

SECTION 3: ADOPTION OF STUDY
The City Council hereby approves the Comprehensive User Fee Study Report prepared by Wilidan Financial Services and dated January 2, 2019, and the findings contained therein. The City Council further adopts the methodology set forth in the User Fee Study page 8) for calculating and collecting the user fees and service charges adopted herein.

A copy of the User Fee Study shall be on file with the City Clerk and available during regular City business hours for public inspection.
3 655
SECTION 4: ADOPTION OF USER FEES AND SERVICES CHARGES
The City Council hereby approves and adopts, as its updated Master User Fee Schedule, the user fees and service charges for the following City departments and fee groups in accordance with the schedule set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference: Finance and Administration; Animal Control; Community Services; Airport; Building; Planning; Utility Billing; Electric Utility; Police; Fire; and Engineering.

SECTION 5: METHODOLOGY FOR CALCULATION, ADJUSTMENT, AND

COLLECTION OF USER FEES AND SERVICE CHARGES
The user fees and service charges established in Exhibit A are hereby adopted, and shall be calculated, adjusted, and collected in accordance with City ordinances and the User Fee Study. The amount of the user fees and service charges may be adjusted annually for inflation on July 1st of each year by the percentage change in the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers ( CPI -U): Riverside -San Bernardino -Ontario ( or any successor index). The calculation for that annual adjustment shall be made using the month of April over the month of April in the prior year.

SECTION 6: EFFECTIVE DATE OF NEW USER FEES AND SERVICE CHARGES The user fees and service charges established by Section 4 of this Resolution shall be effective on the sixtieth ( 60th) day following the adoption of this Resolution.

SECTION 7: REPEAL OF PRIOR USER FEES AND SERVICE CHARGES ADOPTED

BY CONFLICTING RESOLUTIONS
Any and all provisions of prior resolutions of the City Council establishing or modifying user fees and service charges in the categories established in the User Fee Study and set forth in Exhibit A, which duplicate or conflict with the provisions of this Resolution and Exhibit A, are hereby repealed and replaced with the fees and charges set forth in Exhibit A and the terms and conditions established by this Resolution upon the effective date of the new user fees and service charges as provided for in Section 6 of this Resolution.

SECTION 8: SEVERABILITY
If any section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause, or phrase of this Resolution or any part hereof is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Resolution or any part thereof. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed each section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause, or phrase hereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause, or phrase be declared invalid or unconstitutional.

SECTION 9: CERTIFICATION
The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution and shall cause a certified copy to be filed in the book of original Resolutions.
4 656
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 10th day of December, 2019. di
Arthur L. Wel ,, Mayor
City of Banning
ATTEST:

Sonja De La Fuel Deputy City Clerk
City of Banning
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL CONTENT:

Kevin Ennis City Attorney
Richards, Watson & Gershon
5 657
CERTIFICATION:

I, Sonja De La Fuente, Deputy City Clerk of the City of Banning, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution 2019- 13 was adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Banning held on the 10th day of December, 2019, by the following vote, to wit:

AYES: Andrade, Happe, and Wallace
NOES: None
ABSENT: Peterson and Welch
ABSTAIN: None
Sonja e a ue te, Deputy City Clerk
City of Banning, California
7 Resolution 2019- 113
658

EXHIBIT A

MASTER FEE SCHEDULE
Effective 60 Days After Adoption
Adopted on December 10, 2019, and Effective on February 8, 2019 659
Exhibit A to Resolution 2019- 13
Finance and Administration
Fees
6 Description Current Fee/ Charge Unit Notes
1 Document Printing Fees - Black & White 0. 25 per copy 2 Document Printing Fees - Color 0. 35 per copy
3 Photocopying of Documents - Black & White 50. 25 per copy 4 Photocopying of Documents - Color 0. 35 per copy
5 Bound Document Fees
1 plus Applicable per
page charge

1. 00 for binding
materials
6 Photocopy Fees- Oversized ( maps) Actual Cost
7 Providing Agendas, Minutes, Packet, etc.

0. 25 plus postage if
mailed per page
Free if examined at
City HaII. Free for
Council, Affected
Commissioners, Dept.

Heads and Press. Free
for Council Candidates
two months prior to
election.
8 Document Certification 0. 25 per page
Copy of Budget - Other Than

0. 25 plus postage if
mailed
Regulatory Bodies,
etc.
10 Copy of Audit Report - Other

50. 25 plus postage if
mailed
Than Regulatory
Bodies, etc.
11 Return Check Processing 25. 00 1st/ 2nd Check 1st returned check 12 Cassette Tape of Meeting, etc. 9. 00 per cassette
13 DVD of any live broadcast 7. 00 per DVD
City of Banning
Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Fee A

50. 25 NA 0. 25 0

50. 35 NA 0. 35 50

50. 25 NA 50. 25 0

50. 35 NA 0. 35 0
Variable NA
1 plus Applicable per page
charge
0 Variable NA Actual Cost NA

0. 25 NA 0. 25 plus postage if mailed 0

0. 25 NA 0. 25 0

50. 25 NA 0. 25 plus postage if mailed 50

50. 25 NA 50. 25 plus postage if mailed 0
NA NA
California Code, Civil Code -
CIV Sec. 1719
VALUE!

59. 00 NA 59. 00 0

57. 00 NA 57. 00 0
User fee Study Finance and Administration
660
Community Services Department
Municipal Pool
6 Description Current Fee/ Charge Unit Notes
1 Admissions
la Open swim sessions Adults 2. 50 per person
lb Open swim sessions Children/ Seniors 51.0 per person 2 Lessons
2a Resident 40. 00 per person
2b Non - Resident 545. 00 per person
4 Private Rentals 5110. 0
per hour/ 2 hour
minimum
5 Cabana Rentals ( during open swim) 560. 00 Per Reservation 6 Junior Life Guard Classes 50. 00 per person
7 Water Exercise 53. 00 per class
8 Water Exercise - Punch Card - 10 Classes 525. 00 per card Activates _..

JI Description Current Fee/ Charge Unit Notes
1 Youth Flag Football, Basketball & Soccer 30. 00 per session/ per child 2 Day Camp 550. 00 per child/ per week
3 Contract Class Fees 520. 00 - 550. 00 monthly Fees set by instructor 4 Contract Class Fees 53. 00- 55. 00 per class Fees set by instructor 5 Adult Sport Leagues - Softball 5300. 0 per team
6 Adult Sport Leagues • Basketball 5125. 00 per team
Community Center Renf21
8 Description Current Fee/ Charge Unit Notes
1 Private Rates
la Gymnasium 120. 00 per rental
1b Large Mtg Room 60. 00 per rental
lc Small Mtg Room 560. 00 per rental
ld Kitchen & Gym 5300. 0 per rental
1 Non - Profit Rates
2a Gymnasium 500. 00 per rental
2b Large Mtg Room 530. 00 per rental
2c Small Mtg Room 530. 00 per rental
2d Kitchen & Gym 175. 00 per rental
Operation
Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee

4. 70 36% 53. 00 70.);

52. 35 36% 1. 50 0%
dialillial

46. 97 4% 545. 00 13%

50. 00 0% 550. 00 11%
161. 80 0% 5161. 00 46%
5209.2 67% 569. 00 15%
NA NA 565. 00 3096
NA NA 53.0 1756
NA NA 530. 00 2036
Operation
Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee
540. 05 0% 540. 00 33%
576. 90 22% 560. 00 20%
5107. 36 056 520. 00 - 550. 00
5107. 36 056 53. 00 - $5. 00
366. 93 556 5350. 0 17%
5291. 93 4% 5280. 0 174^,
Operation
Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee
5201. 49 31% 5140. 0 17%

82. 03 1556 570. 00 17%
568. 79 13% 560. 00 0%
5329. 46
5201. 49
156
6556
5325. 00

70. 00
8%
17%

82. 03 57% 535. 00 1756

68. 79 49% 535. 00 17%
329. 46 39% 5200. 0 1456
City of Banning User Fee Study Community Services
661
Community Services Department
Senior Center Rental
Description Current Fee/ Charge Unit Notes
1 Private Rates
la Nutrition Site 85. 00 per rental
lb MuIti- Purpose Room 585. 00 per rental
2 Non -Profit Rates
2a Nutrition Site 545. 00 per rental
2b Multi -Purpose Room 545. 00 per rental
Parks Facilities
Description Current Fee/ Charge Unit Notes
1 Private Rates
la Park Picnic Shelter 25. 00 per rental
lb Ballfield 525. 00 per rental
lc Ballfield Lights - 2 hour minimum 515. 00 per hour
ld Dysart Park 5120. 0 per day
le Amphitheater & Stage 35. 00 per rental
if Laura May Stewart Building 585. 00 per rental
lg Roosevelt Park Building New per rental
lh Roosevelt Soccer Field New per rental
Staffing Fees
5 Description Current Fee/ Charge Unit Notes
1 Monday - Thursday 8: 00am- 9: OOpm 512. n0 per hour
2 Monday - Thursday after 5pm, Fri, Sat, Sun and City Holidays 21. 00 per hour City of Banning User Fee Study
Operation
Cost Subsidy% Suggested Fee 0/-
5108.1 8% 5100. 0 18%

92. 03 2% 590. 00 6%
sari
5108.1 49% 555. 00 22%
582. 03 33% 555. 00 22%
Operation
Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee
543.2 31% 30. 00 20%
533.2 1096 30. 00 20%
561. 61 72% 17. 00 13%
5145. 66 0% 5145. 00 21%
545. 01 0% 45. 00 2996
NA NA 590. 00 6%
NA NA 590. 00
NA NA 535. 00
Operation
Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee

20. 00 0% 20. 00

27. 15 1% 527. 00 29%
Community Services
662
No changes, 5 year plan in place
Airport Fees
Fees
Description Current Fee/ Charge Unit Resolution/ Ordinance 1 Fuel Sales Invoice + 25% Reso. 2015- 67
2 Tiedown Permanent 43. 75 per month Reso. 2015- 67
3 Tiedown Temporary 4. 00 per night Reso. 2015- 67
4 City Hangars - A/ B Row 311. 50 per month Reso. 2015- 67 5 City Hangars - A/ B Corner 382. 50 per month Reso. 2015- 67 6 City Hangars - C/ D Row 278. 75 per month Reso. 2015- 67 7 City Hangars - C/ D Corner 349. 75 per month Reso. 2015- 67 8 City Hangars - E Row 295.5 per month Reso. 2015- 67
9 City Hangars - E Corner 322. 50 per month Reso. 2015- 67 City Hangars - F- 1 164. 00 per month Reso. 2015- 67
11 Farrell/ Cooper Hangars - FC B- 1 thru
FC B- 8
175. 00 per month Reso. 2015- 67
12 Farrell/ Cooper Hangars - FC C- 1 thru
FC D -e
186. 00 per month Reso. 2015- 67
13 Farrell/ Cooper Hangars - FC 5- 1 thru
FC 5-6

49. 25 per month Reso. 2015- 67
14 Farrell/ Cooper Hangars - FC A & E 360. 75 per month Reso. 2015- 67 15 Beasley Hangar 295.5 per month Reso. 2015- 67
16 Access Fees 20. 00
per plane, per
month
Reso. 2015- 67
City of Banning User Fee Study
Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Fee A
NA NA Per Reso 2015- 67 NA
NA NA Per Reso 2015- 67 NA
NA NA Per Reso 2015- 67 NA
NA NA Per Reso 2015- 67 NA
NA NA Per Reso 2015- 67 NA
NA NA Per Reso 2015- 67 NA
NA NA Per Reso 2015- 67 NA
NA NA Per Reso 2015- 67 NA
NA NA Per Reso 2015- 67 NA
NA NA Per Reso 2015- 67 NA
NA NA Per Reso 2015- 67 NA
NA NA Per Reso 2015- 67 NA
NA NA Per Reso 2015- 67 NA
NA NA Per Reso 2015- 67 NA
NA NA Per Reso 2015- 67 NA
NA NA Per Reso 2015- 67 NA
Airport
663
Building Department Misc. Fee Schedule
Fees
p Description
Current
Fee/ Charge Unit Notes
Resolution/
Ordinance
1 Air handling/ heating or cooling unit replacement
544. 00 Each
Chapter 1, Section

1. 8. 4 of CBC.
2 Additional plan review
176. 00 Hour
Chapter 1, Section

1. 8. 4 of CBC.
3 Additional plan review- Engineering
176. 00 Hour
Chapter 1, Section

1. 8. 4of CBC.
4 Awning/ canopy ( supported by building) New Each
Lnapcer J. ecuon
1 0 A . d car
5 Balcony/ deck
308. 00 Each
Chapter 1, Section

1. 8. 4 of CBC.
6 Balcony/ deck railing repair
176. 00 Each Chapter 1, Section

1. 8. 4 of CBC.
7 Carport- custom 1. 8. 4
5176. 00 Each Chapter 1, Section
of CBC.
8 Carport- ICC, IAPMO, handout
220. 00 Each
Chapter 1, Section

1. 8. 4of CBC.

Cell tower- modifications 308. 00 A`°'
u r"""'
iu
Cell tower- new
5308. 00 Each Chapter 1,, Section

1. 8. 4of CBC.
11 ChangeB of occupancy P y
5176. 00 Each
Chapter 1, Section

1. 8.4 of CBC.
12 Certificate of Occupancy ( Enhanced)
New Each
Chapter 1, Section

1. 8. 4of CBC.
13 Demolition of building
132. 00
Each
Building
Chapter 1, Section

1. 8. 4of CBC.
14 Electric panel replacement
New Each Chapter 1, Section

1. 8. 4of CBC.
15 Exterior wall covering replacement ( up to 400 s. f.) 5264. 00
Chapter 1, Section

1. 8. 4 of CBC.
16 Fireplace- custom
5176. 00 Each
Chapter 1, Section

1. 8. 4 of CBC.
17 Fireplace- pre -fabricated with engineering
176. 00 Each
Chapter 1, Section

1. 8. 4 of CBC.
18 Flag pole ( over 20' in height)
132. 00
Chapter 1, Section

1. 8. 4 of CBC.
19 Grease trap/ interceptor
522. 00 Each
Chapter 1, Section

1. 8. 4of CBC.

Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Fee C
5115.0 0% 115. 00 50
133. 00 0% 5133. 00 0
165. 00 0% 165. 00 50
163. 00 0% 163. 00 0
5305.0 0% 305. 00 50
190. 50 0% 5190. 0 50
5570. 0% 5570. 0 50
5305.0 0% 5305. 00 0
5265.0 0% 5265. 00 0
854. 50 0% 5854. 00 50
5251.0 0% 5251. 00 50
525. 00 0% 525. 00 50
5256. 00 0% 5256. 00 50
5115.0 0% 115. 00 50.0
5253. 00 0% 5253. 00 50
5353. 00 0% 5353. 00 50
5330. 0% 5330. 0 0. 50
5388. 00 0% 5388. 00 50
5198. 00 0% 5198. 00 50
City of Banning User Fee Study Building Depart Misc. Fee 664
Building Department Misc. Fee Schedule
Fees
p Description
Current
Fee/ Charge Unit Notes
Resolution/
Ordinance
20 Hood- other than Type 1 ( including ducts)
213. 00 Each
Chapter 1, Section

1. 8. 4 of CBC.
21 Hood- Type 1 ( includes exhaust system)

44. 00 Each
Chapter 1, Section

1. 8.4 of CBC.
22 Inspection Fee- Hourly
588. 00 Hour
Chapter 1, Section

1. 8.4 of CBC.
23 Job card- replace/ duplicate

45. 00 Each
Chapter 1, Section

1. 8.4 of CBC.
24 Chapter
Lighting pole ( up to 6) 575. 00 6
1, Section

1. 8.4 of CBC.
25 Lighting pole (up to 6 additional) 544. 00 6
Chapter 1, Section

1. 8.4 of CBC.
26 Chapter
Manufactured home- installation on private property P p Y 5176. 00 Each
1, Section

1. 8.4 of CBC.

Modular unit- installation on private property
176. 00 Each
Chapter 1, Section

1. 8. 4of CBC.

Patio cover- custom
New Each Chapter 1, Section

1. 8. 4of CBC.
29 Patio cover- metal, ICC, IAPMO
176. 00 Each
Chapter 1, Section

1. 8. 4of CBC.
30 Patio cover- wood, ICC, IAPMO or handout
5176. 00 Each
Chapter 1, Section

1.8. 4 of CBC.
31 Patio enclosure 1. 8. 4
5440. 0 Each Chapter 1, Section
of CBC.
32 Plan check
176. 00 Each
Chapter 1, Section

1. 8.4 of CBC.
33 Plan check- Structural Engineer 1. 8. 4
5176. 00 Each
Chapter 1, Section
of CBC.
34 Pool/ spa- commercial
484. 00 each
Chapter 1, Section

1. 8. 4of CBC.
35 Pool/ spa- residential custom
484. 00 Each
Chapter 1, Section

1. 8. 4 of CBC.
36 Pool/ spa- residential fiberglass/ vinyl - g / y lined 5308. 00 Each Chapter 1, Section

1. 8. 4of CBC.
37 Pool/ spa- residential gunnite
484. 00 Each
Chapter 1, Section

1.8. 4 of CBC.
38 Re -Inspection
544. 00 Each
Chapter 1, Section

1. 8.4 of CBC.

Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Fee A
5298. 00 0% 5298. 00 50
5380. 0% 380. 00 50.0
5110. 0 0% 5110. 0 50
560.0 0% 560. 00 50.0
463. 00 0% 463. 00 50
105. 00 0% 105. 00 50
5348. 00 0% 348. 00 0
5409. 00 0% 409. 00 50
323. 00 0% 5323. 00 0
5165.0 0% 5165. 00 50.0
323. 00 0% 5323. 00 0
5350. 0% 350. 00 50.0
125. 00 0% 125. 00 0
247. 50 0% 5247. 00 50.0
5714.0 0% 5714. 00 50.0
5521. 00 0% 521. 00 50
5355.0 0% 5375. 00 50.0
438. 00 0% 5438. 00 0
5121. 00 0% 5121. 00 50
City of Banning User Fee Study Building Depart Misc. Fee 665
Building Department Misc. Fee Schedule
Fees
k Description
Current
Fee/ Charge Unit Notes
Resolution/
Ordinance
39 Re -roof- commercial ( for each 3, 000 s. f.) 5264. 00 3, 000 s. f.

Chapter 1, Section

1.8. 4of CBC.
40 Chapter
Re - roof- multifamily ( for each 3, 000 s. f.) 5264. 00 3, 000 s. f. 1, Section

1. 8. 4of CBC.
41 Re - roof- SR) 5264 00
Each
Building
Chapter 1, Section

1. 8. 4of CBC.
42 Research- hourly 1. 8. 4
5132. 00 Hourly
Chapter 1, Section
of CBC.
43 Residential bathroom remodel- no structural/ wall changes Valuation Each Chapter 1, Section

1. 8. 4of CBC.
44 Residential kitchen remodel- no structural/ wallchanges Valuation Each Chapter 1, Section

1. 8. 4 of CBC.
45 Retrofit foundation for a modular or mobil unit
176. 00 Each Chapter 1, Section

1. 8. 4 of CBC.

Sales office- conversion to residential or garage use
Valuation Each Chapter 1, Section

1. 8. 4 of CBC.

Septic tank 1. 8. 4
5176. 00 Each
Chapter 1, Section
of CBC.
48 Sign- monument
5176. 00 Each
Chapter 1, Section

1.8. 4of CBC.
49 Sign- pole/ billboard 5440. 0 Each
Chapter 1

1.8. 4of C,
Section
BC.
50 Sign- wall 5220. 0 Each
Chapter 1, Section

1. 8. 4of CBC.
51 Site investigation
5176. 00 Each
Chapter 1, Section

1. 8. 4of CBC.
52 Solar- commercial ( each additional kw)
Valuation lkw Chapter 1, Section

1. 8. 4 of CBC.
53 Solar- commercial ( up to 4 kw)
Valuation 4 kw Chapter 1, Section

1. 8. 4 of CBC.
54 Solar- ground mount
Valuation Each Chapter 1, Section

1. 8. 4of CBC.
55 Chapter
Solar- residential rooftop ( more than 10 kw)
5318.0 Each
1, Section

1. 8.4 of CBC.
56 Solar- residential rooftop (up to 10 kw) 5318.0 10 kw Chapter 1, Section

1.8. 4of CBC.
57 Solar- residential water heater 1. 8. 4
588. 00 Each
Chapter 1, Section
of CBC.

Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Fee 8
5198. 00 096 5198. 00 50
5198. 00 0% 5198. 00 50
5198. 00 096 5198. 00 50
591. 00 0% 591. 00 50
5248. 00 0% 248. 00 0
5273. 00 0% 273. 00 0
140. 50 0% 5140. 0 50.0
5140. 096 5140. 0 50.0
5223. 00 096 223. 00 50
5396. 00 096 5396. 00 0
5528.0 096 528. 00 50.0
5190. 0% 5190. 0 0. 50
5278. 00 0% 5278. 00 50
5122. 00 0% 122. 00 50
5243. 00 096 243. 00 50
5470. 096 5470. 0 50.0
5373. 00 096 5373. 00 50
5268. 00 096 268. 00 50
257. 50 096 5257. 00 50.0
City of Banning User Fee Study Building Depart Misc. Fee 666
Building Department Misc. Fee Schedule
Fees
p Description
Current
Fee/ Charge Unit Notes
Resolution/
Ordinance
58 Special Inspector application
New Each
Chapter 1, Section

1. 8.4 of CBC.
59 Stairs- each flight 5176. 00 per flight
Chapter 1, Section

1. 8. 4 of CBC.
60 Storage racks ( each 100 L. F.) 5176. 00 per 1001f.

Chpter 1,

1. 8. a4 of CBSection C.
61 Temporary P Y construction or sales trailer

88. 00 hr Each Chapter 1, Section

1. 8. 4of CBC.
62 Temporary electrical service
588. 00 Each Chapter 1, Section

1. 8. 4of CBC.
63 Temporary electrical service ( each additional pole) 58. 00 Each Chapter 1, Section

1.8. 4 of CBC.
64 Utility release
New Each Chapter 1, Section

1. 8. 4 of CBC.

Walk- in tub
176. 00 Each
Chapter 1, Section

1. 8. 4 of CBC.

Wall- combo
Chapter
each 300 L. F.)
5924. 00 3001f.
1, Section

1. 8.4 of CBC.
67 Wall- freestanding ( each 300 L. F.) 5924. 00 300 If.

Chapter 1, Section

1. 8.4 of CBC.
68 Wall- pilaster 5308. 00 Each
Chapter 1, Section

1. 8.4 of CBC.
69 Wall- retaining- custom ( each 50 L. F.) 5528. 00 SO If. Chapter 1, Section

1.8. 4of CBC.
70 Wall- retaining- handout ( each 50 L. F.)
528. 00 SO If. Chapter 1, Section

1. 8. 4of CBC.
71 Chapter
Water heater replacement
515. 00 Each
1, Section

1. 8. 4of CBC.
72 Water as piping- installation, alteration or g P P g repair P

58. 00 Each
Chapter 1, Section

1. 8. 4of CBC.
73 Chapter
Window/ door replacement- residential, no changes to framing 5132. 00 Each
1, Section

1. 8.4 of CBC.

Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Fee G
533. 00 0% 533. 00 50
5215.0 0% 215. 00 50
5154. 25 0% 154. 00 50
5148.0 0% 5148. 00 0. 50
5168. 00 0% 168. 00 1
5110. 0 0% 115. 00 513
5115.0 0% 115. 00 0. 50
5198, 00 0% 5198. 00 0
5308. 00 0% 5308. 00 0
5333. 00 0% 5333. 00 0
333. 00 0% 333. 00 50
538.0 0% 5538. 00 50
278. 00 0% 278. 00 0
5115.0 0% 5115. 00 50
5280. 0% 5280. 0 50
5248. 00 0% 248. 00 50
City of Banning User Fee Study Building Depart Misc. Fee 667
Budding New or Add SF The F. defaults to hit test. but can 9, manoals charmed 0, the column. The per 100 51. will automatically updalo BUILDING PERMIT FEES • Plan Check, Inspection and Permit Fees Combined U8C
Class UBC Occupancy
Square
Footage Old Conatntction Fee Schedule
Commernal• New 1, 001
5,01
10, 001
20, 001
50001
100. 01
1, 826. 00 plus

2. 835, 50 qua
3, 939. 00 plus
4, 6984, 00 plus
6, 945. 03 plus
11,00, 0 plus

25. 31 I. each additional 100 61. orltaceon thereof> M5° 1100 5. 1 50 and including 5, 0005. 1.

22. 02 for oath additional 10051. what/ on thereof> ha8ef 10004, 55 and including 10, 000 s. 1.

7. 45 for each additional 10054 or fraction thereof 0 hallo/ 100al, to and including 20, 00051

7. 54 for each additional 10051. orMction thoreol> hall of 10001., to and Including 50, 0003. 1. 8, 31 breach additional 100 s. f or fraction thereof> half of 100 s7., to and including 100. 000?.

11.0 for each additional 10051 or fraction thereof
Tenant Improvements 1
801

1. 251
2501
5, 001

12. 501
1,51. 00 plus 15. 77 for each additional 10051. or fraction thereof 0 half of 1005.-, 55 and Including 800 a. l. 1, 782. 00 plus 13. 78 for each additional 10054 or fraction thereof > hallo( 10001„ 50 and including 12000!. 2, 471. 00 plus 4, 55 for each additional 10001. or fraction thoreol > ballot 100 al, to and Including 25000!, 2, 926. 00 plus 4. 53 for cash additional 100 51 or fraction thereof > half of 10001, to and including 500051. 4, 375. 00 plus 5, 15 ter each additional 100 01 or fraction thereof > half of 10001, to and including 12. 50051,

6. 950, 0 plus 5. 90 for each addlbn, 110051. or fraction thereof Industrial - New 1. 001
5, 001
10, 001
20, 001
50, 001
100, 001

1. 56500 plus 22. 47 for each addition, 1100,. or fraction thereof > MB of 100., 55 and inducting 5. 000 51

2. 46400 plus 19. 36 Nr sash additional 100 a4 or fraction thereof > hag of 10051, to and including 10, 000 a1, 3, 432, 00 plus 6. 94 for each addsonal700. 1, orfraction thereof > hall of 10031, 10 andlndudag 20, 00001 4, 126, 00 plus 6. 20 Nr oath additional 1003. -or fraction thereof> ha0 e110011, to and indudn950. 0000J, 5, 985, 00 plus 7. 53 for each additional 10051 or fraction% woof> half of 10051, to and including 10013002J.

9. 750, 0 plus 9. 75 for each addliona110054 or fraction Nereid F-1 Woodworking 1. 001
5, 001
10, 501
20, 001
50, 001
100, 001

1. 095,0 pls 30, 74 for sash additional 10051. or fraction thereof> half of 100x1, N and including 5. 00031. 1, 710. 0 plus 26. 65 for oachadderonal 1000.. or fraction Maroel> half of100al, to and including 10, 000 s. 1 2, 376, 00 plus 6. 18 for each additional 1005E orBaotou thanol> ha84410091„ o and Including 20, 00054 2835. 00 plus 8, 93 for each474200ai 1005. or fraction therso10 half 341005., to and including 500000. 1 4, 175, 03 plus 10,6 for each addIionel 100 s1 or fraction thereof> half of 10051., Nand Including 100, 0001, 6, 715. 00 plus 13. 43 for each additional 100 al or fraction thereof Stool Produclror6Fa0rIcation 1, 001
5, 001

10. 001

20. 001
50, 001
100. 01
1, 930. 0 plus 13. 83 Nr each additional 10051, or 1racsn thereof > hag of 100 51., to and including 5, 00004

3. 036.0 plus 11, 92 for each additional 1000(. or fraction thereon half of 10031., to and including 10, 0005/. 4, 228. 00 plus 4. 24 for each additional 10051. or fraction thereof> half of 10031, 55 and Including 2000054

5. 078.0 plus 3. 54 for each additional 1000. 4or fraction thereof > hall of 10051, te and lnctudag 50, 0005. f 7, 080, plus 4. 62 ler each additional 0000/, or Notion thereof > half of 100 al., to andlndudkg 100. 00 61 12, 000. plus 6. 00 for each addhiono1100 51, or fraction thereof 144 Repair Garage 1, 001

5. 001
10, 001

20. 001

50. 001
100. 01

2. 023,0 plus 26, 62 for each addilwnal10051. or fraction thereof > Ml/ a111531., to andu0iseg 5. 0005!, 3, 168. 00 plea 24, 76 for nub add9bna110001. or fraction thereof> half o1100 51, to and including 1000051

4.06, 00 plus 6.6 for each a849anal 1005.. or fro 75e101> half 0 ol100, 1.. toand Including 20. 0005f5: 272. 00 pan 6. 16 for. 0eh 0440bna11005, 4or fraction thereof > half of 1005.„ to and Including 50, 000, 1.

7.20, 0 plus 9. 50 for each additional1001, 1 or fraction thereof> hallo( 10001, to and

12. 470, 0
including 1000000. f
plus 12. 47 for each addiponal 10051 or tractor, thereof 145 Aucrah Hangar 1, 001

5. 001

10. 001
20, 001
60, 001
100, 01
2, 196. 00 plea 29. 1, for each adddwnal 10051. or fracoon ' hereol> 90 x110054, to and including 5. 000 a. f. 3,66. 00 phis 25. 75 ler each additional 100 al or fraction thereof 0 half of MO 51., 50 andindudeg 00.005/

4. 653, 00 plus 8. 07 for each additional 100 s1. or fraction thereof> hall of 10051:, to as including 20. 0005. 1

5. 460, 0 plus 9, 50 for each . 440070110001. or fraction thereof > hallo? 10051„ Io and including 50. 000 s.0. 8, 310. 0 plus 9, 36 for each additional 100 el or fraction thereof > half of 100 51, to and indudn9100, 0001. 12, 990. 0 plus 12, 99 for each add9unal 1005/. or fraction thereof

1. Nursery - Pull time 15. 1, 001
5, 001

10. 001
20, 001
50, 001
100. 01

1.51. 00 plus 15. 77 far each additional 1005, or fraction thereof > hag of 10( 3.5, to and Including 5, 000 5.1.

1. 78200 plus 13, 78 for each 0449i,1100 cf. or( radon thereof > half afl00 al, to wort including 10, 00051- 2, 471. 00 plus 4. 55 for each additional 100s. lor fraction Buren, >half of 10051., to and including 20. 00051. 2, 926. 00 plus 4. 63 for each add00n411000. 1 or fraction thereof > he8 of 10054, le and including 50, 000, 1. 4, 375. 00 plus 5, 15 for each 448069al 10051 or fraction th. aol> half of 100 01, to anaixmding 100. 00 3.1.

6. 950, 0 plus 8. 95 for each additional 10051 or fraction thereof i- .2 Health Cam canters 1, 001
5, 001

10. 001

20. 001

50. 001
100. 01
2, 380. 0 plus
3, 898. 00 plus

5. 139, 00 plus

6. 150, 0 plus
9, 010, plus

14. 550, 0 plus

33.8 1or each addd8nal100 54 or fraction thereof> half of 100 51.. to and including 5. 00061,

28. 87 for each additional 10051- or fraction thereof > halter 10064, to and including 10. 00051.

10.1 for each additional 10031. orfraction thereol> half of 1005.. to andincludno 20, 00051

9. 53 for each additional 1005. 4 er fraction thereof> half of 100., to as including 50, 000 51.

11. 08 for each additional 1006?. or fraction thereon half of 100 51., to and including 100. 00061 1455 for each additional 10031 or fraction thereof
12 Nursing Horne/ Assisted Living? 1, 001

5. 001

10. 001

20. 001
50, 001
100, 51
2, 364. 00 plus 33. 43 f. Oath additional 10) 01 or fraction theraof > halfof 10051, 5 and include, 5. 000 0. 1.

3. 102, 00 plus 28. 93 f. Wien additional 100 51 or fraction thereol> half of 10051, to and including 10. 0005!.

5. 148, 00 plus 10. 08 for each add' nbna1100 s!. arachon thereof> hag of 1005!., to and including 20, 00051

6. 156, 00 plus 9. 56 foroath additional 10051 or fraction thereof > half of 10051. 5 and Including 50. 00051.

9. 025, plus 11. 09 for each additional 10051 or fraction thereof* half of 10051, to and Including 00.0051, 14, 570. 0 pis 14. 57 for each additional 10011. or rachen thereof New Con3tmc0, n Fee Schedule . 100% Cost Recovery

52. 925, 38 plus 26. 92 for each additional 10081. or fraction thereof > hal of 100 5.1., to and nclu1mg 500053. 4, 002,0 pus 30. 59 for each 0440600010031 or fraction thereof > half of 100 0,1., 9, and Including 10, 0003. f

5.48. 25 plus 20, 99 ler each addi4ane1100a1arbastion thereof> hag of 10001. to and including 20, 00051 7, 045. 13 plus 9, 10 for each additional 100... or fraction Unroof > half of 1005,, to and including 50, 00051. 10, 374. 75 plus 626 for each446507, 110s- lerfraction tweet >half of 16001, ha and including 100. 00 al

13. 506, 75 plus 837 for each additional 10051. or fraction thereof

51. 89225 plus 47, 58 for oath additional 1003. l, or fraction thereof > hat of 10051„ to and including 6005, E 2,72, 88 plus 89. 42 for Oath additional 100 slot hachantherool> hal of 10051„ to and nchWlng 1250 s,1.

2. 675, 2 phis 54. 81 for each additional 10051. 3rfraction thanof> ha8 of 10051„ to and including 2500 s1,

3.60.8 plus 26. 97 for each additional 1003., ar fraction thereof> hat/ o1100 s!., l and nchding 500051, 4, 034, 63 plus 9, 43 for each additional 103 or fraction thereof > hal of 1005l,. 10 and including 12, 50061,

4. 741, 50 plus 12. 72 for each add8onal 10051. or fraction thereof 52, 631. 75 plus 17. 67 for each 444801al 10005!. or fr001908wre010 hall of 10001-, to and irobding 5, 000. 1 3:38. 83 plus 20. 01 for each 08860nal 10034 or fraction thereof> half of 10014. to and including 101300 51 4, 339. 13 plus 13. 05 for each 0444. na110031. or ftac8on thereof a hall 011008. 1„ to and Including 20, 000 51.

5. 644, 13 plus 4. 28 for each additional 10091., 1900605thereof 8 half 0100051., to and including 50, 000 , 1. 6, 927. 38 pis 4. 26 for each additional 10051. or faction thereof> hall of 10051„ to and 9, 058. 8 plus 5,2 far each additional 1000f. or fraction thereof Including 100. 00,. l

90. 00 plus
plus
pus
plus
plus
plus
for each 84460na11005. 1or fraction thereof> half of 10081-, to and including 5. 000 51. for each additional 1005!. or fraction 80. 18010 hag of 10051., to and Including 10, 000 5J. for each additional 100510r fraction hereof > half of 1005. 5. 10and including 20, 050 0/. for each additional 100 0, f. or faction thereof 0 half of 100 31., to and including 50. 000 51 for each additional 100 04 or goon thereof> hag x110031, lo and including 100, 00001, for each additional 100 al. or fraction thereof

50. 00 plus
plus
plus
plus
Plus
for oath addnonal 100 al. or fraction thereof 0 nag of 10031, loand Incbdin9 5, 000 04 for each additional 100 04 or haction th. mot> half of 10352, to and including 10, 000 51, tar each additional 1000!, or fraction thereol0 half 0110002. 10and inducing 20. 00031. for each additional 10054 or fraction thereof w hag of 100 s1„ to and including 5000054. for each additional 100 slow fraction thereof, half of 100 sl„ to and ncluding 100, 00 01. or each additional 100,, or fraction thereof
30, 00 plus
Pis
pls
Fis
pus
plus
for each. 44, 0on, l1001.. or fraction thereof > half 01100. 1., to and 84o4,95, 00001. for each add60nal 100. or fraction thereol8 half of 100 01,. 10' 494 Including 10. 00051, fur oath additional 100 sl. or fraction thereof> half of 10051, to and including 20, 000 01, for each additional 100 51. wfraction thereof> half of 1003. I,, 00094 including 50. 000 V. for each 3489onal 100 star fraction thereof, hay 81100 04. 10 and including 100. 00031. for each addeona1100 51. or hasten thereof

90. 00 plus
plus
pls
plus
pis
for each. 4068, al 100 31 or iracaan thareol> half of 100 sl.. to and including 5. 00051. far each addMenal 100 54 or fraction thereof > half of 10001, and Including 10, 00004 for each addi60ns1100 01. or fraction thereof > half of 10011, to and including 200001. 1:
for each addilbnaf 10001 or fraction th. nol0 hag of 1005, to and Including 50, 00054 for each additional 100 s4 or fraction thereof > MB, 1100,., to and including 100, 00 cr. for each ad40. 1,? 00001. or fraction thereof

00.0 plus
Plus
plus
Plus
Plus
plus
for each oddieoml 000 5, or fraction thereof > hal of 100 5f„ to and eciudng 5, 000 51.

Nr each additional 100 V. or fraction thereof a hal of 100 sl., to and including 10, 000 31 for each . 189.5? 100 s/, er fraction thereof> half o1100 51, 03 and including 20, 000 a1, for each additional 1000. or fraction thereof > half of 100 01, to and including 50, 000 s., for each ad8Nonal 10001 or Inchon thereof > half of 100 51., to and Inckding 100. 00001 for each 048, 6. 011000. 1, or fraction thereof

50. 00 plus
plus
plus
plus
du,
plus
preach add8onal 100. 5or fraclbn thereof> half of 100 01.. 10 and including 5, 000 sf.

Nr each additional 100 01, or faction thereof 0 hell of 100 0.4, to and including 10000 51 Nr each additional 1000. offractIon thereof 0 half of 100 51„ to and Including 20, 000 5., for each additional 100 31. orhad6n thereof> half el 100 s.4, to and including 50, 000 51. for each additional 100 01. or 1, 081, 1them./ 0 halal 100,,?,, to and including 100, 00 01. for each additional 100 3.1. or Iranian thereof

50. 00 plus
plus
Plus
plus
plus
plus
far each additional 100 01. or traction thereof > hall of 100 s. f„ to and Including 5, 000 sf. for each additional 10031 or fraction thereon hell of 100 5.1.0 and including 10, 0005. 1- Nr each additional 100 04 or fraction ' hare*? > half of 100 51, to and including 20, 000 s. f, for each additional 1001.. or fraction thereof > half of 100 04, to and including 50, 000 51 for each additional 1001.. pr fraction thereof > half of 1005(, to and including 100. 00 s4 for each additional 10014, or fraction thereof
Ow of Banning User Fee Study 9uI0,3 kit
668
BUILDING PERMIT FEES - Plan Check. Inspection and Permit Fees Combined UBC
Class UBC Occupancy
square
Footage Old Construction Fee Schedule
4 Depanmont Stores 1. 01
10, 001

20. 001
50001
100, 01

1. 74010 plus

2. 747, 00 plus
3, 828. 00 dm
4, 612. 00 plus

8. 660. 9 pus
10, 890, 99 pus
26, 17 for each a0d0ion01100.,?. or fraction thereof 4hag of 110 s, 1-, to and including 5, 00031.

21. 63 for each additional 100 al, or fraction thoreof, he of10081.. to and including 10, 000 s1.

7. 54 for each add6bnal 1008, lorfraction thereof half of 10001. loand Including 20, 00001

6. 83 for each additional 100 a. or fraction thereol, hag 01003. to and inducting 50. 000 a,

8. 48 for such additional 1008, orlre09100t reo( 4 hag of100a4, to and including 100, 000,, 1 10, 59 for each additional 100 31. or fraction thereof
Id Stores lRetodl 1, 001
5, 001
10, 001

20. 001
50, 001
100001
1, 67100 pus
2, 649. 00 pus

3. 696, 00 pus
4,68. 00 plus
6, 405. 00 pus
10, 530. 0 plus

24. 45 ! preach add0ional100, 4 orfraction thereal, half of 10031. to and including 5, 0000. 1. 2094 for each additional 10031. or fraction lhereol, half of10001„ b and including 10, 00001.

7.2 for each additional 10081, or traction thereol, hall05100 0/., to and Including 20, 00031,

6. 46 foreach . 4817,4! 100, 4. or fraction lhereol, half of 10001.. to and including 50, 00031. 6, 25 for each additional 100 s.1, or traction thereof half of 100 0. 5., to and including 100. 00081.

10. 53 for , ach additional 100x1. or fractionlhared
0 Retail Tennant Improvements 1, 001
5, 001
10, 001
20, 001

50. 001
100. 01
861. 00 pus
1, 32010. plus

1. 926, 00 pus
2, 14510 pas
3357. 90 pus
5, 104, 00 plus

57. 40 for each additional 10031 orlraction thereon had of 100 s1., to and Including 5, 00001 50,7 for sash additional 10081. or traction theraol> hag 9710001, b and including 1000031.

15. 98 for each additional 100 al. or fraction thereon 538911000. 1, b and including 20, 00031.

18. 53 for each additional 100 8 . of Iracdon thereof > half ' 100 0. 1., to and Including 501003J.

18. 47 for sash additional 10531 or fraction thereof, half of1000, 1•, to and Including 100. 030 11.

25. 52 for each additional 100 57, or lradontherool
R. 1 Hotels 8 Motels ( repeat) 1, 001

5. 001
10001
20, 001
50001
100. 01
2, 158, 00 plus

3. 409, 00 plus
4, 752, 00 plus
5, 72810 plus

8. 26510 pus
13, 520W pas

31. 29 for each addition! 10031 or ffasien thereol, half of 100 slab and Including 5, 000 31,

26. 86 for each additional 10031 oractbn thereol, 808 of 10031, to and Including 10. 0000. 1

9. 76 for each additional 10031 or (radon thereon MP o110001, to and including 20. 0001. 1, 8, 46 for each additional 10001, or hasten thereof half of10031, to and including 50. 00031

10. 51 for each additional 100 01 of fraction thereon ha8 of 1000... la and including 100, 00 5.1 13, 52 for each additional 100 01 or fraction thereof

0.1 Apartment 6516 ( repeat) 1. 001
5, 001

10. 001

20. 001
50, 001
100, 01

2. 158, 03 plus

3. 10818 flu,

4. 752. 00 pus
5, 728. 00 pus
0, 26510 plus

13. 520, 0 pus
31, 29 for each additional 100 51. or fraction thereon half of 1000110 ark including 5, 000 31. 26, 06 for each ad4ition01100 s, l, of fraction thereon ha8 of I00 8f„ to end locludng 10. 000 s1

9. 76 for each. 40itional 100 3. 1. orlacion thereon hall of 10031, to and Including 20. 00001.

8. 46 for each additional 10031 or traction thereof> hal of 100 a. to and including 50. 0031

10. 51 lot 0,5 additional 100 31. o, fraction thereof, ha80l 10001, to and including 100, 00 31

13. 52 for each additional 100,. 7 or fraction thereof
Rem4enW3 Now (single or
multi family- qr Anling wit)
601

1. 201
2, 001
3, 001
4, 001

6. 001
10, 001
pus na. for each additional 1006. or fradon thereof half of 10081„ to and including 800 a1. pus ma. for each additional 100 s. f or fraction thereof half e110001,, toark including 120031. pus ma. forrich additional 100t1. or 1006, nthereof 508,10001„ to and including 200001. pkn ma. for each additional 10031 or fraction thereof, half of 10001.. to and including 300081. plus n.a. for each addition, 1100sl. or fraction thereof> half' 10031., to and Including 4000 s1 plus n.a. for each additional 1000f. 00 fraction thereof, half of 10031, to and including 6000 01 n.a. pus n.a. for each additional 1005.?, or fraction thereof 07084? 100 al„ to and including 10033 a 1. n. a. qua n. a, for each ad6iliona11008l. orhaefon thereof Reskanoal- Production Pnase
501

2. 001
3, 001
3, 001
4, 001

6. 001

10. 001
n. a. plus ma. for sash a4d4iona) 10081. orlra0aon thsroof 0110o0100a, to andndu0ng 80081. pea na. for each additional 10031 or fraction thereol, half of 103 to and including 1200' 81. na. plus , for sash additional 100 31 or fractionihoreof> half el 100 3. 1., b nerd including 2000 sl. n.a. lor. 007 additional 1000. f or fraction ' Woof 0 half o1100a1, es and includn93000 s1, plus ma, for each odditnnal100 al, Parse00n thoreol> halo/ 100 a. l., to and indudng 400051 plus n.a. foreach add500411005, 1. or fraction Mono? a. half of 100, 4., to and nclu481600031. plus n. a. for each30050031100 sl. or fraction thereof MN of 10001., to and including 10000 a1. n. a, pas n,a. for each additiena11W 31, or fraction thereof

8. 2. 1 Group Cara Non- Amb) 60) 250
1250

2. 500
5000
12, 500

25. 000

1.09, 00 pus
1, 676. 00 plus
2, 310. 0 plus

2. 67910 pus
4, 17000 pus

6. 403. 00 plus

56. 76 fo0 each additional 100 al orlraction thereof, ha8 el 10031, to and including 735081. 50, 69 for each additional', 00s, I or fraction thereof, half 4? 10001., to and including 2, 500 01

14. 77 for each additional 10031 or ' radon thereof, half of 10001, to and including 5. 00001,

19. 88 for each 061,. 100 01. or fraction thereon half el 100 81., to and Including 12, 500 a1

17. 86 for each 04dition3I 100 01 or fraction thereol, hag of 100 01., to and Including 25, 00 a,1

25. 61 for each addiliono1700 51. or fraction them?

9. 218 Group Care. Ambulatory 1657 250
1, 250
2500

5. 000

12. 500
25, 00
1214, 00 pus
1, 961. 00 plus
2, 574, 0 pus

3. 023, pus

4. 594, 00 pus

7. 193. 00 plus

84.0 for each 344) 00al 10031. or fraction thereof > ha80l 10031„ to and including 125001. 57, 02 for each additional 100, 4. or fbc9on thereon Lag of 100 3. 1. to and Including 2, 500 , 1.

17. 95 for each 340it0na1100 M. or Reston them,. 0 half' 100 al.. to and Including 5, 00031.

20. 65 for cosh additional 1000,. or fraction thereof, hell of 10081,0and including 12. 500 0.1.

20. 79 for each additbna11000. or fraction thoreof, half' 1005l.. lo and indudng 25. 000 cf. 28, 77 for each addition' 1000.. or Inaction Ih0reof
Gw' Bantams User Fee Studs
New Construction Fee Schedule • 100% Con Recovery
80, 00 plus for each additional 100 af. of fraction thereof 0 hag of 10001, to and including 5, 000 al, pW for each , ddi5onal100sl, or fraction there" hag of 100 a, to and including 1010031 plus for each additional 10081. or fraction ? hereof0 5.0,10031., to and including 20, 00031 plus for each additione1100 81 or fraction thereof 0 hag of 100 81,. to and Including 50. 000 81, PL. for each addi6ene110031. or fraction thereof , halo( 10031„ to and including 100, 00af.

Plus for eacha400onal loo al, orfraction thereof
1000 plus
plus
plus
pu,
pea
pus
for oath addi0en0! 100 a1, or fraction thereof, hall o1100 0f., to and including 5, 000 al, for exh additional 100 s, f, or fraction thereof 0 had 100 51„ to and 011641ng 10, 000 al, lot each addition$ 100 01, or fraction thereof ha8 of 100 af., to and including 20, 000 al. for each additional 100 31. or fraction thoreol> ha8 of 100 51„ to and including 5010054. for each additional 100 ad. or fraction thereon half of 100 31., to and including 100, 000. 5. for each additional 100 a, l, or fraction thereof

80. 00 plus
plus
pus
pus
pus
qua
for exh additional 10001 or fraction thereof 0 ha of 100 0/„ to end MBkirg 5, 003 31 for each additional 100 01. or fraction thereof, half of 100 al.. to and Including 10, 000 08. for each oddi0ona1100 a1 or fraction thereof , ha8 of 100 al„ to and including 20, 000 s. l. for sash additional 16031 or fraction thoreof > half of 10031, to and Including 50. 000 sl. for each additional 100 s, l, or fraction thereof 0 half of 100 al„ to and including 100. 00001. for each additional 100 11. or fraction ? hereof

80. 00 plus
pus
pus
pus
pus
pus
for each 404, 5onal 1000, or fraction thereof half of 10001, to and including 5, 000 8!, for each additional 100 0. f. or fraction thereol, hog of 100 01., to and Including 15000 01 for sash additional 100 31 or /radian thereof, half of 100 51, to and including 20, 000 31. for each additional 100 5,. or fraction thoreof > ha of 10001, to and Including 50, 00031 for each additional 10031. or fraction thereof, half of 100 31. to and Including 100. 00 0.5. for each addnona) 100 31. or fraction thereof

50. 00 qua
plus
pus
pus
plus
pea
for 9405300, 90nu1100 31. of fraction thereon half of 100 31., to and including 5, 000 s. f. for each addition/ 110001. or fraction thereol, hall of 100 31, to and including 10, 000 3f. for each 044i8on4110031, or fraction thereof half of 100 0.1 to and i cludin920. 00031
for each W40, 02110001. Of fraction thereon half or 100 31, to and Including 50, 00001 for 03, 6 additional 10001. or fraction thereof hag of 100 8f., to and Including 100, 00 31 for each addtona1100 31, or fraction Loreto,
82, 512. 13 plus 24. 47 for each additional 10031 or fraction thereof 0ha8 of 1CO tct and including 80001, 2, 707, 88 pus 67. 97 for each addional100a1. 0rfradiantherson half of 10031, to and nclu4ing 120031

2. 979. 75 pus 43. 50 for each additional 10051. or fraction thereof, half of 10011, to and including 200031. 3,27, 75 plus 44, 59 for each additional 10031, ot fraction thero, f 0 half of 10031, to and including 300031 3, 770. 63 pus 63. 08 for each add4ona1100al. or fraction thereof 0 half 0100084, 7 and including 400931.

4.04, 38 qua 41. 33 foreach add9ona11003i. of fraction thereol, half of 100 a. to and Including 6000.. 1 5, 230, 86 plus 23. 11 for each additional 100al. Or fraction thereof, he, of 100sl., to and including 10000. 1. 6, 755. 2 plus 31. 19 for each additional 100 a1. or fraction thereof 82, 211. 99 pus 28, 00 for each, 2490nal I00 a./. orfraction thew!, half of I00a1. b and including 80031.

2. 436, 00 plus 7. 61 for each add0unol 1000.5, fraction thereof 0 half of 103 01., to andncludiny 12000.. 2, 466.5 plus 60, 36 for each a4d9onal 100., or fraction therwf > half of 10051.. to and including 200081. 2, 949, 30 plus 27. 19 for each additional 10031. or fraction thereof, half of 10091,0 and including 300031. 3, 221. 18 plus 53. 72 for each additional 100 01 or fraction 000100f> half Of 100a1, loand including 400031. 3, 758. 10 plus 39, 26 for each additional 10031. or fraction thereon h08 of 10011, to andincuding 600031,

4. 543.9 plus 19. 25 for each additional 10001. of fraction 0000.046, 00l 10081„ toand 06&, 41ng 1000081.

5. 313, 5 plus 117 for each additional 100 al, or fraction thereof

50. 00 glue
plus
p800
plus
pus
pus
for each a4dn0na1100 Si. of Inchon thereof 0 5011 of 100 a1, to and ncading 5, 000 31. for each additional 10031. or fraction there', half of 100 s, l„to and including 10, 000 sl, for each addi9onal 100 s1, or fraction thereof > half of 100 31, to and ncludin020, 00 sl, tor each additional 1000.. or traction there', half of 100 8, f., to and including 50. 000 31, for each eddi9on01100 s. f. or fraction ' haled 0 half of 100 3f.. to and including 100, 00 s1, lot sash additional 100 31. or fraction thereof
2000 plus
plus
plus
pas
plus
Plus
for each 1ddibon ? 100 31 or facbon Mateo? > hat of 100 31„ to and o 4uthng 5, 000 al, for sash 344, 9ana110001. or ?radian thereof half at 100 01. 10 and including 10, 000 31 for each addi0ona1700 al, or fraction thereof, half of 100 0. f-, to and including 20, 000 01. for each additinb1100 s. l. or fraction thereof > hall 011000110 and including 50, 000 s. f. for each additional 100 al. or fraction thereof > hall of 100 0,, to and including 100, 00 s.1 for each ad0i00rul 100 01 or fraction Moreol
Building Fees
669
BUILDING PERMIT FEES - Plan Check, Inspection and Permit Fees Combined UBC
Class USG 0ccu Occupancy v
Square 4+
Footage Old Construction Fee Schedule New Construction Fee Schedule • 1980 Cost Recovery 4-2,1, Group Caw, Non• Amb. 114/ 300
1, 500

3. 000
6, 000
15000

30. 000

1. 33800 plus 5901 for each 300itona110031 or Buchan thereof a nap 011006, 1., to and including 1, 00031

2. 046.0 plus 5214 for each additional 100 s.(. or fraction thereof a half of 10031. to and lndudng 300031 2, 526. 00 pus 18. 24 for each odditiona? 100 al. or fraction thereof, hag of 100 s, t, to and including 6. 000 31,

3.15. 00 pus 19, 35 forsackad0bnal 100 s. f. or fraction thereof hallo? 100 31., to and 5, 057.0 plus 18. 91 for each additional 1000,?. or fraction thereof liar of 100 s. f., to and including 15, 000..
including 30. 0009. 1.

7. 893. 00 plus 26. 31 for each additional 10031, or fraction thereof R• 2.1 6 Group Cato. Ambulatory ( 14) 300

1. 500
3, 000

6. 000
10000
30000
8, 33600 pus 5901 for each soagonal 100, 0 or fraction thereof half 9? 100 s, l., to and 2046, 00
including 15009. 0
pus 52. 14 for ouch additional 1003.?. or fraction 106130? a half of 1006,, to andindud6g 3. 00061, 2, 826. 00 phis 16. 24 for each additional 1003?. or fraction IMreel> half of 10031„ to and Including 6, 0006. 1 3,15. 00 plus 19. 35 for each additional 100.?. or fraction thereof a half »? 1003, f„to and Including 13, 000 61

5. 057.0
7, 893. 00
plus 18. 91 for ouch additional 10031 or faction thereof hag of10031, toand including 30. 0006. fplus 26, 31 for each additional 100 s1 or? racoon thereof

5. 1 M. Storago 1000
5, 000
10, 000

20. 000
50000
100000
1253. 00 pus 16, 34 for each a0d0ona110031 or fraction Mineola hatred 1003.. to and Including 5. 000 s. f.

1. 957, 00 plus 15, 70 tier each additional 10031, or fraction thereof aha6 of 100 s,8,, to and including 10. 0003, 1

2. 77200 pin 550 for oath additional 100 s. l.or fraction thereof a ballot 10031.; k and including 20. 00031 535200 plus 4, 86 for each additional 10031, or fraction thereof a hag of 100 31, to and including 50, 0006. 1. 4, 810. 0 pus 6. 20 lot sash additional 100 sl. or fraction torso' 0 half 01100. 1„ to and indudna 100, 00 sr. 7, 910. 0 pus 7, 91 for each additional 100 sl. sr fraction thereof 6• I Moderate Hazard Storage 1, 000
5 000
10, 000

20. 000
50, 300
100, 00
1, 494, 00 pus 20. 84 for each additional 10031 or fraction ' home half o110031., to and Inducting 5. 0006. f2. 328, 00 plus 1512 for each additional 10031 or fraction thereof a half al 100 3. 1., to and include' 10. 000 61 3, 234. 00 pus 6. 18 for each additional 10031 or fraction thereof a hags' 100 31., to and including 20, 000 3. 1. 3, 852. 00 plus 6. 14 tor each additional 100,. or fraction thereof hallo( 1001,, la and including 50. 00031

5. 69510 plus 6. 85 for each additional 10061. or fraction ? hereol> hog of 1003.?., k and Including 100, 00 s. f. 9, 120. 0 pus 9, 12 Ioreach additional 10031- or fraction tholes?

5. 2 Low Hazard Storage 1, 000
5, 000
10, 000

20. 000
50000
100. 00

1. 947, 00 plus 27. 31 for each adelona110011. 0, 580eon thereof a nag of 10031, to and lndudmg 5. 00061. 3, 03900 plus 23. 70 for each additional 10031, orirac80n thereof a half of 10031, to andindudng 10, 00031. 4, 224, 00 plus 8. 16 for each additional 10031 sr ?radon thereof half of 1003., to and including 2000031 5040. 0 plus 7. 93 for each additional 100 s1. or ?radon thereof half of 10031, to and including 50, 000 3(. 11, 940. 0
7, 420. 0 plus
plus 11. 94

9. 04 for
for
each
each additonal
additional
10031.
10031. or
or
traction
traction
thereof
thereof
ahog of 100 s. f., to andt0uding 100, 003, 1
an 200

1. 000
2, 000
4, 000
10000

20. 000
1314, 00 plus 80.6 for each addition? 1003. sr Patton thereof a hag of 100 s,h,? 0 and including 0000, 1, 1, 86100 plus 7127 for ouch additional MOsA, or fwc9onlhereof a hag 0100 3.0 Is and Including 2. 00061 2, 574. 00 pus 22. 43 for ouch additional 10031. or fraction thereof a half of 10031, to and including 4. 000x1. 3, 022.0 pus 26. 15 for each additional 10031- or fraction tharaola Mko? 10031-, 18and including 1000031 4, 593. 00 plus 26. 01 for each additional 1006.. or nacho, thereof ahall of 100 cf., to and including 20. 00031. 7, 194. 00 plus 35. 97 Ior each additional 100 s. f. or fraction thereof Residential- Addition ( single or
multi family) 1
301
501
801
1, 501
2001
1, 320. 0 pus 90. 73 for each additional 100 sl, or fraction thereof a hag of 1003,, to and including 300 3.1.

2. 046,0 plus 7921 for each additional 1009!. or fraction thereon 6860110031., to and including 500 31. 2, 83100 pus 26. 39 for each 004,0, a1100& J, 0rlracoon thereof a hallo( 1003.., to and ndu050000s(. 3,6600 pus 2751 for each additional 10051. or fraction thereof, half of 100 al., to and indudag 150031,

0.1600 pus 29. 70 for each additional 1003. or fraction thereof shallot 10061., to and including 2. 0003.*

7. 98600 plus 39. 93 for each Macau? 10031, or fraction thereof Residential. Remodel ( angle at
multi family) 1
301
501
001
1, 501
2, 001
1,09. 00 plus 70. 95 for each additional 100,. or fraction thereof 1 hl of 1001.„ to and Including 3003, 1, 67600 pus 63. 35 for each additional 10031. et fraction teeeol a half WOO to and Including 5003. f 2, 310. 0 plus 18. 47 for each additional 10061, 0? fraction thereon half of 10051„ to andlndudng80061. 2, 67900 pus 24. 85 for each additional 10031 or fraction thereof, half of 10091., to and Including 1500 s. f.

4. 170. 0 pus 22, 32 for each additional 10031 or fraction thereof a 50641100 s.1„ to and including 2, 000 9.?.

6. 402. 00 plus 32, 01 far each additional 100 s. f. or fraction theme? Snell Buildings 1
1001
5, 001
10, 001
20001
50, 001
806. 00 plus 112? for each additional 1003?. or fraction thereol> half of 100 s.1, to and inducting 1, 000 13. 125500 plus 9. 75 Br ouch additional 10011 of fraction thereof, M8e1100 s,1, to and including 5. 000, 1.

1. 742, 00 pus 3.2 for each additional 10031, or faction thereof a half of 10031,?, and including 10. 00031.

2. 074.0 pus 3.0 for each additional 10031: or fraction thereol, hag of 100.?.. to and including 20. 0003,?, 3, 065.0 plus 3, 71 la each additional 100 s. l. or Pastan disrupt a hag of 100al„ to and Including 50, 000 5.1

4. 920. 0 pus 4. 92 for each additional 10031. or fraction thereof Gam., Sloragol Workshop 1
401
001
1, 001
1, 501

20. 001
pus nua. for each additional 10031. srfrectan thereat M6s/ 100 3.1., to and including 4003. 1. pus ne. for each additional 100 ,, 1 sr fraction thereof a hog of 10030, to and Including 60031 plus n.a. for each addition 100 cf. orPatton thereon half of 10031.. to and including 1000 cf. pus n. a. Ior each additional 10011, a fraction thereof a half of 1003. t,o and inducing 1. 5000. 1, pus n. a. for each additional 1003,. or traction Memo( a half or 10031.. to and Including 20. 00031 n.8. plus n, a. for each additional 10031 or fraction thereof

80. 00 plus for each030,? onal 10031- or traction thereof a half of 100 s1., to and including 5, 000 s.?. plus for each additional 10001. of traction thereof a half of 100 s1., to and including 10. 000 91 plus for each additional 10091 or fraction thereof a half of 10031. and including 20, 0009. 1 plus for each additional 1003.. or traction thereof0 hag 0110030, to and Including 50, 00051, plus for ouch salaam.? 10031 or fraction thereof a hall 0110031. 1and including 100. 00031 plus for each add0ono11009. 3ar fraction thereof

50. 00 pas
plus
plus
plus
plus
plus
for anal admnona1100 s. l. or traction 8313060 hog of 100 3.1„ to and hchlding 5000 3, 1 for each 40050, al 100 slot fraction thereof a hag of 100 3f„ to and including 10, 000 31. for 005 4000ono? 100 O. or fraction thereof, half of 100 3f., to and Including 20, 003 11. for each additional 100 31 or traction Mayo? agog of 100 s. f., to and including 50. 03031. for ouch additional 100 3. 1. or fraction thereof » half 01100 3f„ to and Including 100000 s. l. for each additional 100,. or fraction thereof

80. 00 pus for each additional 10091. 0r fraction thereof a half of 100 31, to and including 5, 000 31, plus ler each additional 100 slot fraction thereof a half of 10031,0 and including 10, 000 31. pus fat ezch additional 100 31 or fraction thereof a half of 100 31,. to and Including 20. 000 .. 1. plus • for ouch additional 100 slot fraction Inureof> hag of 10031, to and including 20. 000 3. 1. pus PREF! for each additional 100 s. f, or fraction thereola hag of 10031-, to and including 50, 0003(. plus . REF, for each additional 100 slew fraction Memo? 80, 00 pus - for each additional ? 00 cf. 01* action Meteor a hall of 10031„ to and Including 500031 pen • broach additional 100 al. sr fraction thereof a half of 1001..0 and Including 10. 00031 plus • for each additional 100 s. l, or fraction thereof, hag of 10031„ toark including 20, 0005/, plus • for each additional 100 s/. ortraction thereof a halt of 100 cf., to and including 20, 00031 plus FREF! Icr each additional 100, 1. or faction thereof a half of l00 al., to and Including 50. 00031. plus NIGER for each additional 10030 or fraction thereof 80, 00 pus - Brandt addlhenal1003/. or fraction iMreola hal of 10031, to and Including 5. 000 3. 0 plus - for each 340040al 100 31 or fraction thereof a half of 10031, to and Including 10, 0003V. plus - for each additional 10031 -or fraction thereola hag of 10063.8and including 20, 00031- pus • for each additional 100. or fraction Merest a half of 10031. B and including 20, 000 31, pu, ? REF! for each oddi9ona110051. or nudism thereof , hall of 10031,0 and including 50, 00031. plus PREP! for each additional 100 31 or bastion thereof 60, 00 plus - for each additional 10031. or Mction thereof 0 hag of 10031Jo and inducing 5, 060 3. 1. plus - for each additional 10031. or fraction thereof a half of 10031, Is and including 10, 000 3. 0 plus - for each additional 100 slot fraction Mereol a hal of 1005.. to and including 2000011. plus • for each additional 1003.?, or fraction thereol, ha6 of 10031„ to and Including 20. 000 31. plus 85E41 Br each additional 10091. ot fraction thereof » half of100a,?., to and Including 50. 000 3.1. plus PREF! for each a044,,, l 100 s1. or fraction thereof 51, 74010 plus 43, 50 fits each additional 10031. or fraction Inureofa half of 100 s-1., to and including 3003,

1. 870. 5 plus 154. 88 for each additional 100 a. or fraction Memo?, hal of 10031. Pa and including 50031.

2.40.5 pus 10150 for sash additional 100 slot fraction thereol half of 1003,, to and 2, 54475
2, 990. 63
plus
plus

63. 70

91. 35
for
for
each
each
additions/
addibionat
103
100
V.
slot
sr fraction
fraction
thereof
thereof
ahalf
a hag
of10031., toand '
of 10031,. 1s and
krcudirg800a, f.
n08rding1500, gIncluding 2, 08031
3, 447, 35 plus 122. 82 for sash add0onal 1006.?, or fraction thereof 81, 326. 75 plus 16.3 l,reach additional 100 slot fraction thereof a half of 100 31.. to and including 300 3f, 1381,3 plus 119, 63 Breach add: ona? 1001. or fraction thereof a hag of 10031„ to and npludng 500 s. f. 1, 620. 38 plus 39. 88 for each additional 100310r Ndion thereof 1, 740, 0
a hal of 100 s, f„ to and ncWing8001. 1
plus 38. 54 for each additional 10031. or fraction thereof a hal of 1003., to and Including 150011, 2011. 88 plus 21. 67 for each additional 1005J. orfraction thereof a hall of 100 1.0, to and including 2, 000 31. 2, 153, 25 pus 3108 for each additional 10031. or traction thereof 02, 707. 85 plus 30. 45 for each additional 160,, 01traction 514. 010 hell of 100 V.. to and including 1, 0003,?. 3, 012. 30 plus 11.5 Br each additional 100 slot fraction thereof a hall of 10031„ to and including 500031 3, 45025 plus 15, 23 ( or each * Maul 100s,?. or fraction thereof, hat of 10031, to and ncudin910, 00031

4. 219. 50 plus 729 for each additional 100 slot fraction Merest hat of 1003/, loard including 20, 00031, 4, 948, 13 plus 3. 19 Br each 300, 99na110031. ot fraction Memo,. hal of 100 s. l, to and Including 50, 020 11,

5. 905, 13 pus 423 for each additional 100.: or fraction thereof

11. 054. 88 pus 24. 47 for each 01450, al1031. or Mcl,, n Meteda half of 100sl„ to and including 400 cf. 1,52. 75 pus 59. 61 / 0r each additional 10031, or fraction thereola ham of 100 s. f.. to and Including 600. 1. 1272. 38 plus 32. 63 for each additional 10031. or traction thereof hag of 1003, to and including 1000 1. 0

1. 402, 88 plus 2025 breach additional 100 5,1. or fraction thereon hell of100s- 1-, to and including 1, 5003.?.

1. 544, 25 plus 63, 77 for each additional 100 sl. or fraction thereof a half of 10031., to and Including 20, 000 3. 1. 1, 620. 38 plus 84, 57 lot each add0on, 1100 31. or fraction Memo? City at2nnin5 Sher 3e< 5tudy 9uqing r«
670
Planning Department
Planning Fees*
Description
Current
Fee/ Charge Unit Notes
1 Adult Ent Zoning Permit 7, 562. 00
2 Annexation Fee 4,89. 00 Deposit
3 Appeal of PC Decision 7, 155. 00
4 Appeal of Planning Dept. Decision 4, 942. 00
5 Certificate of Completion/ Lot Line Adj 1, 086.0
6 Clarification of Ambiguity/ Omission 1, 723. 00
7 Conditional Use Permit 4, 779. 00
8 Conditional Use Permit Amend 7, 211. 00
9 CUP - sexually oriented business 5, 031.0
10 Design Review 4, 904. 00
11 Design Review Amend New
12 Development Agreements 8, 352. 00 Deposit
13 EIR- City Admin Charge
6, 417 +
consultant' s
fees
Deposit
14 Environmental - Mitigation Monitoring New Deposit
15 Environmental Assessment - ND or MND 3, 124. 00
16 Environmental Filing Fee/ Environmental Fish and Game Fee New 17 Extension of Time, CUP or Design Review New
18 Final Parcel Map 4, 379. 00
19 Final Tract Map ( 51 + lots) 8, 195. 00 Plus 70/ lot 20 Final Tract Map ( first 50 lot) 4, 885. 00
21 General Plan Amendment (Land Use) 6, 192. 00
22 General Plan Amendment (Policy) 6, 900. 0
23 Landscape - minor 884. 00
24 Landscape review - major 2, 030.
25 Lot Line Adjustment 1, 086.0
26 Lot Merger 761. 00
A 3%Technical and FaMibes based surcharge will be added to all Flat and Deposit Based Application Fees City of Banning User Fee Study
Full Cost
Subsidy Suggested
Fee
931. 55 712% 7, 562. 00 0
8, 236. 13 58, 845. 00 Deposit
1, 829. 1 0% 51, 829. 00 74%
53, 498. 76 0% 3, 498. 00 29%
51, 916. 60 0% 1, 965. 00 81%
789. 23 0% 789. 00 54%
4, 718. 11 0% 54, 718. 00 1%
4, 374. 93 0% 4, 374. 00 39%
2, 313. 59 0% 2, 313. 00 54%
55, 881.4 0% 5, 881. 00 20%
4,74.0 NA 4,74. 00 New
Variable NA 26, 008.0 Deposit
Variable NA 513, 226. 00 Deposit
Variable NA 5, 000. Deposit
8, 161. 33 1% 8, 209. 00 163%
NA NA Actual Cost Actual Cost
5717. 0 0% 717. 00 New
958. 38 0% 5958. 00 78%
1, 885. 73 0% 51, 885. 00 77%
1, 514. 79 0% 1, 514. 00 69%
58, 008. 1 0% 8, 008.0 29%
7, 070.4 0% 7, 070. 2%
935. 72 0% 5935. 00 6%
1, 028. 46 0% 1, 028.0 49%
797. 92 NA 5797. 00 27%
5673. 81 0% 673. 00 12%
Planning Fees
671
Planning Department
Planning Fees *
Description
Current
Fee/ Charge Unit Notes
27 Cannabis Cultivation Permit - Personal 170. 00
28 Minor develop plan review - SFD 890. 00
29 Minor modification of an Application 2, 465. 00
30 Mural permit 51, 310. 0
31 Planning letters 55- $80
32 Pre App Review New
33 Request for Public Hearing 1, 802. 00
34 Sign Permit - Freestanding Sign New
35 Sign Permit - Panel Change Only New
36 Sign Review 5537. 00
37 Site Plan Review 5, 885. 00
38 Specific Plan 59, 863. 00 Deposit
39 Specific Plan Amend 10, 405. 00 Deposit
40 Temp Signs 5235. 00
41 Temp use permit 51, 001.0
Sidewalk Vending Temporary Use Permit New Flat
42 Tentative Map Time Extension 4, 258. 00
43 Tentative Parcel Map 9, 811. 00
44 Tentative Tract Map (Less than 50 lots) 7,57. 00 Deposit 45 Tentative Tract Map (50 lots or more) New Deposit
46 Tentative Tract Map Condition Monitoring New Deposit 47 Variance 4, 292. 00
48 Zone Change 8, 524. 00
49 Zone Text Amend. 6, 900. 0
50 Technology Surcharge added to all Fees above 50. 00
A 3% Technical and Facilities based surcharge will be added to all Flat and Deposit Based Application Fees Full Cost
Subsidy Suggested
Fee
779. 46 67% 255. 00 50%
5890. 67 0% 890. 00 0%
1, 011. 73 0% 1, 011.0 59%
5650. 06 0% 650. 00 50%
168. 82 0% 168. 00 50%
1, 410. 15 NA No Charge N/ A
51, 953. 2 0% 1, 953. 00 8%
499. 85 0% 5499. 00 N/ A
5108. 42 0% 108. 00 N/ A
278. 90 0% 278. 00 48%
5859. 9 0% 859. 00 85%
Variable NA 16,33. 00 Deposit
Variable NA 511, 656. 00 Deposit
278. 90 0% 278. 00 18%
51, 065. 86 0% 51, 065.0 6%

0.0 0% 50. 00 0%
53,08. 07 0% 3, 508. 00 18%
8, 253.7 0% 8, 253. 00 16%
58, 936. 41 1% 8, 985. 00 Deposit
9,83. 7 0% 59, 983. 00 Deposit
NA 55, 000. Deposit
4, 269. 81 0% 54, 269. 00 1%
6, 917. 76 0% 6, 917. 00 19%
6, 950. 07 0% 6, 950. 0 1%
0% 2.5%
City of Banning User Fee Study Planning Fees
672
Misc. Utility Customer Service Fees
Water & Waste Water Utility Fees
Description
Current
Fee/ Charge Unit Notes
1 Water Deposit - Residential - Initial - Credit Check
2 Green Rating
3 Yellow Rating
4 Red Rating
5 Water Deposit - No Credit Check or Letter of Credit
6 Water Deposit - All Other Classes of Service New
7 Water Deposit - Reconnection After Processing for Non - Payment New 8 Water Account Set - Up Fee - next business day 27. 00 9 Water Account Set - Up Fee - Same Day ( 8: 00 a. m. to 12: 00 p. m.) 30. 00 t Water Account Set - Up Fee - Same Day ( 12: 00 p. m. to 3: 00 p. m.) 30. 00 Water Account Set - Up Fee - After Hours ( 3: 00 - 8: 00 a. m. next business day & holidays and weekends)
146. 00
12 Water Meter Reinstallation Fee 95. 00
Customer self restore
and/ or damaged meter
13 Cut/ Broken Lock Fee New
14 After p. m. Von fee 146. 00
Water Meter Installation Fee of (Brand New Service)
15 3/ 4" Meter 258. 00 Per Meter
16 1" Meter 384. 00 Per Meter
17 1 1/ 2 " Meter 580. 00 Per Meter
18 2" Meter 765. 00 Per Meter
19 Anything larger than 2"T & M Per Meter
20 Water Meter Test Fee 80. 00 One test free per year Add' Itests are $ 80. 00 21 Water Backflow/ Cross Connection Testing 82. 00 Plus materials 22 Backflow Device Installation - Time & Materials T & M Each 23 Fire Flow Test 92. 00 Each
24 Installation of Gate Valve Fee 87. 00 Per hour + Materials 25 Water Service Lateral Installation ( 3/ 4" Meter) 4, 025.0 Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee
NA NA 0.0
NA NA 100. 00
NA NA 150. 00
NA NA 150. 00
NA NA
2X est average for
location or min of

50. 00
NA NA 3X est ave bill

29. 00 NA 30. 00 11%

32. 00 NA 35. 00 17%

44. 00 NA 45. 00 50%
220. 00 NA 219. 00 50%
139. 00 NA 142. 00 49%

15. 00
217. 00 NA 219. 00 50%
284. 00 285. 00 10%
410. 00 414. 00 8%
602. 00 608. 00 5%
873. 00 875. 00 14%
T&M

98. 00 100. 00 25%

82. 00 0%
T&M

94. 00 95. 00 3%

87. 00 0%
4, 025.0 0%
City of Banning User Fee Study Misc Utility Fees
673
Misc. Utility Customer Service Fees
26 Water Service Lateral Installation (1" Meter) 4, 140. 0 27 Water Service Lateral Installation (11/ 2" Meter) 4, 685. 00 28 Water Service Lateral Installation (2" Meter) 4, 855. 00 29 Water Service Lateral Installation (>2" Meter) T & M Time & Material 30 Construction water meter deposit (hydrant meter) 500. 00 Per Meter 31 Sewer Connection Investigation - Dye Check 82. 00
32 Trespass/ Diversion/ Theft of Service 250. 00 1st offense 33 Trespass/ Diversion/ Theft of Service 500. 00 2nd offense 4, 140. 0 0%
4, 685. 00 0%
4, 855. 00 0%
T&M
NA NA 800. 00

94. 00 95. 00 16%
NA NA 300. 00 20%
NA NA 600. 00 20%
City of Banning User Fee Study Misc Utility Fees
674
Misc. Utility Customer Service Fees
Miscellaneous Fees
it Description
Current
Fee/ Charge Unit Notes
1 Delinquent Notice Fee 13. 50
Account balances
more than $ 75 31
days past due
2 Door Hanger Fee 13. 50
3 Late Fee New

1. 5 % of unpaid
balance after 30 days
but less than $ 75
4 Non -Sufficient PaPayment Y ( Return Fee -& Check Autopay) P YJ 25. 00 Add $ 13. 50 Door
Hanger
1st Occurance
5 Non -Sufficient Payment Return Fee - ( Check & Autopay) 35. 00 Add $ 13. 50 Door
Hanger
2nd Occurance within
12 months
Processing Fee for Credit Check for Deposit Determination New Each Person 7 Processing Fee for Non - Payment New per service
Electric Utility Fees
8 Description
Current
Fee/ Charge Unit Notes
1 Reconnection Charge (Additional) OH or UG service terminated by electric crew
265. 00
2 Reconnection Charge ( Additional) Service Drop removed by electric crew
265. 00
3 Trespass/ Diversion/ Theftof Service 250. 00 1st Offense 4 Customer Requested Electric Operations Service Call " Trip Charge" New Charge is assessed if an
additional trip is required
to complete the service
call, due to customer
oversight
5 Electric Deposit - Residential - Initial - Credit Check New 6 Green Rating
7 Yellow Rating
8 Red Rating
City of Banning User Fee Study
Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee
NA NA 18. 50 27%

18. 50 27%
NA NA
10 % of unpaid
balance after
30 days but less
than $ 75. 00
NA

25. 00
Add New Door
Hanger Fee
535. 00
Add New Door
Hanger Fee

2. 50
NA NA 545. 00 NA
Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee
558. 83 29% 397. 00 33%
265. 02 0% 265. 00 0%
NA NA 975. 00
5124. 68 1% 124. 00
NA NA 0.0
NA NA 100. 00
NA NA 5150. 0
Misc Utility Fees
675
Misc. Utility Customer Service Fees
9 Electric Deposit - No Credit Check or Letter of Credit 10 Electric Deposit - All Other Classes of Service New
2X est average for
location or min of
100. 00
Electric Deposit - Reconnection After Processing for Non - Payment New Electric Account Set - Up Fee - next business day 27. 00 Electric Account Set - Up Fee - Same Day ( 8: 00 a. m. to 12: 00 p. m.) 30. 00 14 Electric Account Set - Up Fee - Same Day ( 12: 00 p. m. to 3: 00 p. m.) 30. 00 15 Electric Account Set - Up Fee - After Hours ( 3: 00 - 8: 00 a. m. next business day & holidays and weekends)
146. 00
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
150. 00
2X est average
for location or
min of $100. 00
3X est ave bill

30. 00

35. 00

45. 00
219. 00
10%
14%
33%
33%
City of Banning User Fee Study Misc Utility Fees
676
Police
Fees Below are Set By BMC Codes
Description
Fee ( Penalty/ Late
Fee) Unit Governing Code
1 Prohibited Stopping or Parking at red curb 45. 00" 13- 21 BMC 2 Prohibited Stopping or Parking 558. 00* 13- 22A BMC
3 Parking not to Obstruct Traffic 58. 00" 13- 23 BMC
4 All night and vehicle maintenance parking prohibited 50. 00*/$0 13- 24 BMC 5 Standing or Parking on one- way roadway 45. 00*/$0 13- 25 BMC 6 Parking on grades 45. 00*/$ 45. 00 13- 26 BMC
7 Unlawful parking -- peddlers, vendors 80. 00*/$0 13- 27 BMC 8 Temporary parking restrictions 45. 00"/$0 13- 28 BMC
9 Time limit parking zones -- green curbs 58. 00* 13- 29 BMC 10 Parking within space markings 45. 00*/$0 13- 30 BMC
11 Parking in freight and passenger loading zones -- time limits

45. 00*/$0 13- 32 BMC
12 Stopping in Alley 58. 00" 13- 33 BMC
Designated bus and taxicab zones 80. 00*/$0 13- 34 BMC
Restricted use of Bus and Taxicab zones 58. 00" 13- 35 BMC 15 Trailer or semi - trailer parking prohibited 80. 00*/$0 13- 39 BMC 16 Commercial Parking in Business & Residential districts 80. 00*/$0 13- 40 BMC 17 Parking in excess of 72 hours 45. 00" 10.2. 045 BMC
18 Commercial vehicle -- parking prohibited 5113. 00* 10.6. 020 BMC 19 Vehicle parked transporting animals/ nuisance 100. 00* 10.6. 020A1 BMC 20 Vehicle parked with hazardous substance within city 100. 00* 10.6. 020A2 BMC 21 Vehicle parked on road for repair 100. 00" 10.6. 020A3 BMC 22 Commercial vehicles over 10, 000 lbs. parking in
residential area
113. 00* 10.6. 020B1 BMC
23 Commercial vehicles over 10, 000lbs. parking on
lot/ unimproved
113. 00" 10.6. 02082 BMC
24 Commercial vehicles over 10, 000 lbs. parking within 100 ft of residential area
113. 00` 10.6. 02083 BMC
25 Commercial vehicles over 10, 000 lbs. parking within 150 ft of driveway opening
113. 00* 10.6. 02084 BMC
Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Fee A
NA NA 545. 00* 0
NA NA 58. 00" 0
NA NA 58. 00" 0
NA NA 50. 00*/$0 0
NA NA 45. 00"/$0 50
NA NA 45. 00*/$0 0
NA NA 80. 00*/$0 0
NA NA 45. 00*/$0 50
NA NA 58. 00* 50
NA NA 45. 00*/$0 50
NA NA 45. 00*/$0 50
NA NA 58. 00* 0
NA NA 80. 00*/$0 0
NA NA 558. 00* 0
NA NA 80. 00*/$0 0
NA NA 80. 00*/$0 50
NA NA 45. 00* 0
NA NA 113. 00* 0
NA NA 100. 00" 0
NA NA 100. 00" 50
NA NA 5100. 0* 0
NA NA 5113. 00* 0
NA NA 5113. 00* 0
NA NA 113. 00* 0
NA NA 113. 00" 0
City of Banning User Fee Study Police Fees
677
Police
26 Commercial vehicles over 10, 000 lbs. parking in
commercial property
113. 00* 10.6. 02085 BMC
27 Commercial vehicles over 10, 000 Ibs. parking in non - residential property
113. 00* 10.6. 02086 BMC
28 Commercial vehicles over 10, 000 lbs. parking in alley 113. 00* 10.6. 02087 BMC 29 Commercial vehicles over 10, 000 Ibs. parking adjacent to public facility
113. 00* 10.6. 02088 BMC
30 Commercial vehicles over 10, 000 lbs. unattached trailer 113. 00* 10.6. 02089 BMC 31 Commercial vehicles over 10, 000 lbs. idling over 15 minutes
113. 00* 10.6. 020C BMC
32 Unregistered vehicle 73, 00* 4000A CVC
33 Display of license plate 73. 00* 5200 CVC
34 Improper Display of Tabs 30. 00" 5204A CVC
35 Unauthorized Parking on Public Grounds 35. 00* 21113A CVC 36 Stopping/ Parkingin Bicycle lane 35. 00* 21211A CVC
Parking within Intersection 48. 00* 22500A CVC
Parking in Crosswalk 48. 00* 22500B CVC
s Parking adjacent to Safety Zone 48. 00* 22500C CVC
40 Parking within 15 feet of Fire Station Driveway 48. 00* 22500D CVC 41 Parking blocking a driveway 48. 00* 22500E CVC
42 Parking on a sidewalk 48. 00* 22500F CVC
43 Parking blocking excavation 48. 00* 225000 CVC
44 Double Parking 48. 00* 22500H CVC
45 Parking in a posted bus zone 263. 00* 225001 CVC
46 Parking on a bridge 48. 00* 22500K CVC
47 Parking blocking wheelchair access 338. 00* 22500L CVC 48 Parking in posted Fire lane 80. 00* 22500. 1 CVC
49 Parking more than 18" from the curb 48. 00* 22502A CVC 50 Posted no parking 35. 00* 22505B CVC
51 Parking in/ Obstructing space designated for the
disabled
338. 00* 22507. 8A CVC
52 Obstrucing/ blocking disabled space 338. 00* 22507. 88 CVC 53 Parking on blue crosshatch 338. 00* 22507. 8C CVC
54 Obstructing disabled parking space 338. 00* 22507. 8C1 CVC 55 Obstructing disabled parking space 338. 00* 22507. 8C2 CVC NA NA 113. 00* 0
NA NA 113. 00* 0
NA NA 113. 00* 0
NA NA 113. 00* 0
NA NA 113. 00* 0
NA NA 113. 00* 0
NA NA 73. 00* 0
NA NA 73. 00* 0
NA NA 30. 00* 0
NA NA 35. 00* 0
NA NA 35. 00* 0
NA NA 48. 00* 0
NA NA 48. 00* 0
NA NA 48. 00* 0
NA NA 48. 00* 0
NA NA 48. 00* 0
NA NA 48. 00* o
NA NA 48. 00" 0
NA NA 48. 00* 0
NA NA 263. 00* 0
NA NA 48. 00* 0
NA NA 338. 00* 0
NA NA 80. 00* 0
NA NA 48. 00* 0
NA NA 35. 00* 0
NA NA 338. 00* 0
NA NA 338. 00* 0
NA NA 338. 00* 0
NA NA 338. 00* 0
NA NA 338. 00* 0
City of Banning User Fee Study Police Fees
678
Police
56 Parking within 15' of Fire hydrant 535. 00* 22514 CVC 57 Unattended vehicle 35. 00" 225156 CVC
58 Locking person in vehicle 535. 00* 22516 CVC
59 Parking within 7. 5 feet of railroad track 535. 00* 22521 CVC 60 Parking within 3' of a sidewalk access ramp 338. 00" 22522 CVC 61 Abandoned vehicle 275. 00*/$ 50. 00 22523 CVC
Towing and Storage Services Fees - Below Set By Contract 9 Description Current Fee/ Charge Unit Notes
1 Base Towing Rate - Class A Tow Truck 130. 00
per hour, 1 hr
minimum
2 Heavy Duty Towing Rate - Class B Tow Truck 165. 00
per hour, 1 hr
minimum
3 Heavy Duty Towing Rate - Class C and D Tow Truck 250. 00 per hour 4 Related Service 350. 00
per hour for crane
recovery
Lock Out (no towing required) 65. 00
Lock Out ( towing required) No Charge
7 Dolly No Charge
8 After Hours Release Fee 65. 00
9 Storage
9a Automobiles 30. 00 per day, outside
9b Automobiles 35. 00 per day, inside
9c Motorcycles 15. 00 per day, outside
9d Motorcycles 20. 00 per day, inside
9e Trucks, 1 ton under 20 ft. 40. 00 per day
9f Trucks, over 20 ft. 50. 00 per day, per unit
Miscellaneous
9 Description Current Fee/ Charge Unit Notes
1 All Reports - Black & White 50. 25 per copy
2 All Reports - Color 0. 35 per copy
3 Report Request Form - Black & White 0. 25 per copy
4 Report Request Form - Color 0. 35 per copy
NA NA 35. 00* 0
NA NA 35. 00* 0
NA NA 35. 00* 0
NA NA 35. 00* 0
NA NA 338. 00" 0
NA NA 275. 00*/$ 50. 00 0
Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Fee A
NA NA 130. 00 0
NA NA 165. 00 0
NA NA 250. 00 0
NA NA 350. 00 0
NA NA 65. 00 0
NA NA No Charge NA
NA NA No Charge NA
NA NA 565. 00 0
NA NA 30. 00 0
NA NA 35. 00 NA
NA NA 15. 00 0
NA NA 20. 00 0
NA NA 40. 00 0
NA NA 550. 00 0
Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Fee A
NA NA 0. 25 0
NA NA 0. 35 0
NA NA 0. 25 0
NA NA 0. 35 0
City of Banning User Fee Study Police Fees
679
Police
5 Special Events Charge ( 4 hr minimum) 65. 00
per officer, per
hour
6 Special Events Charge ( 4 hr minimum) 70. 00
per corporal, per
hour
7 Special Events Charge ( 4 hr minimum) 80. 00
per sergeant, per
hour
8 Special Events Charge (4 hr minimum) New
Per Lieutenant, per
hour
9 Special Events Charge ( 4 hr minimum) New
Per Captain, per
hour
10 DUI Investigation & Fine 5110. 0 per vehicle
11 DUI Enforcement Charge
Same as special
events chg
12 DUI Recovery New
Allowed under California
Government Code Sections
53155; cannot exceed
512, 000
K- 9 Unit Service Charge
Same as special
events chg
14 Public Dance Fee
Same as special
events chg
15 Traffic Control Fee
Same as special
events chg
16 Vehicle Storage Release 577. 00 per vehicle
17 Vehicle Storage Release - 30 day New per vehicle
18 False Alarm Response none 1st response
19 False Alarm Response none 2nd response
20 False Alarm Response 572. 00 3rd response
21 False Alarm Response 5144. 00 4th response
22 False Alarm Response 144. 00 5th + response
23 Clearance Letter Fee 525. 00 per letter
24 Photo Sales Charges 510. 00 per print
25 Bicycle Licenses 6. 00 per licence
26 Fingerprint Fee 515. 00
D. O. J. fees if
applicable
102. 84 5% 97. 50 33
124.6 15% 5105. 00 35
5130. 37 8% 120. 00 40
192. 39 45% 105. 00 NA
180. 72 31% 125. 00 NA
NA NA 5110. 0 0
NA NA
Same as special
events chg
NA
Variable NA
Actual Cost Up to
12, 000
NA
NA NA
Same as special
events chg
NA
NA NA
Same as special
events chg
NA
NA NA
Same as special
events chg
NA
NA NA 115. 50 39
NA NA 115. 50 NA
NA NA none NA
NA NA none NA
NA NA 572. 00 NA
NA NA 144. 00 NA
NA NA 5144. 00 NA
527. 70 10% 525. 00 0

10. 00 0% 10. 00 0
NA 0% 5. 00 51
NA NA 15. 00 0
City of Banning User Fee Study Police Fees
680
Police
27 Vacant & Distressed Buildin g
Fee 75. 00
Each Property/ Pr
Year
Resolution 2009- 0
28 Tape Duplication Fee 30. 00 per tape
29 Civil Court Case Charge
Actual Salary
Involved

75. 00

17. 21 13% 15. 00 15
NA NA
Actual Salary
Involved
NA
City of Banning User Fee Study Police Fees
681
Fire Department
Plan Review/ Inspection
Description Current Fee/ Charge Unit Notes
1 Residential Plan Review/ Inspection 5134. 00 per hour ( 1 hr. min.) 2 Commercial/ Industrial Plan Review/ Inspection 5134. 00 per hour (1 hr. min.) 3 Automatic Fire Extinguisher Plan Review/ Inspection 5134. 00 per hr./ person 1 Fire Alarm Plan Review/ Inspection 5134. 00 per hr./ person 5 Sprinkler System Plan Review/ Inspection 5134. 00 per hr./ person Fire Code Compliance Inspection "' ""' '
Description Current Fee/ Charge Unit Notes
1 Annual State Mandated Inspection 134. 00
per hr./ person (1 hr
min.)
2 Operational Permit Annual Inspection New per hour ( 1 hr. min.) 3 New Business Fire Hazard Inspection 134. 00
per hr./ person (1 hr.
min.)
4 Engine Company Inspection
5 Inspection no fee
6 1st Reinspection no fee
7 Subsequent reinspection 5134. 00 per hr./ person
8 Fire Suppression Cost Recovery Actual Cost
9 Fire Prevention Investigation Covered by County Contract 10 EMT Service, Non- resident Covered by County Contract 11 Care Facility serving 25 or fewer persons 550. 00 Mandated by State 12 Care Facility serving 26 or more persons 5100. 0 Mandated by State 13 Hazardous Materials Record Location

13. a Category 1, Level la 5268. 00

13. b Category 1, Level 1b 5335. 00

13. c Category 2, Level 2a 5268. 00

13. d Category 2, Level 2b 5335. 00

13. e Category 3, Level 3a 5402. 00

13. f Category 3, Level 3b 469. 00
14 Hazardous Materials Response Actual Cost
15 Non Compliance Fee New per hour ( 1 hr. min.)
16 Special Event fee New per hour ( 1 hr. min.)
17 Special Event - Inspection Fee New per hour ( 1 hr. min.) Full Cost Subsidy 96 Suggested Fee 0/-
5181. 72 0% 5182. 00 26%
5181. 72 096 5182. 00 26%
5181. 72 096 5182. 00 2696
5181. 72 096 182. 00 26%
5181. 72 0% 5182. 00 26%
Full Cost Subsidy 96 Suggested Fee
5181. 72 0% 5182. 00 2696
5181. 72 096 5182. 00 N/ A
5181. 72 096 5182. 00 2696

50. 00 10096 50. 00 N/ A

50. 00 10096 50. 00 N/ A
5181. 72 096 5182. 00 26%
NA NA Actual Cost NA
NA NA
Covered by County
Contract
NA
NA NA
Covered by County
Contract
NA
NA NA 50. 00 50
NA NA 5100. 0 50
NA NA 5268. 00 50
NA NA 5335. 00 50
NA NA 268. 00 50
NA NA 5335. 00 50
NA NA 5402. 00 50
NA NA 5469. 00 50
Variable NA Actual Cost NA
5181. 72 0% 5182. 00 NA
5181. 72 096 5182. 00 NA
5181. 72 096 5182. 00 NA
City of Banning User Fee Study Fire Fees
682
Engineering
Public Works Permit Fees
Description Current Fee/ Charge Unit Notes
1 Curb & Gutter - < 100 ft. 60. 00
2 Curb & Gutter -> 100 ft. New per 100 ft
3 Sidewalk - <400 sq. ft 60. 00
4 Sidewalk - >400 sq. ft New per 100 ft
5 Pavement - < 1000 ft. 120. 00
6 Pavement - each additional 1000 ft. New
7 Driveway approach - Residential 560. 00 Each
8 Driveway approach - Commercial 81. 00 Each
9 Wheelchair Ramp 560. 00 Each
10 Cross gutter/ spandrel 103. 00 Each
11 Sewer main, storm drain, water main <50 ft. 582. 00
2 Sewer main, storm drain, water main >50 ft. New per 50 LF Sewer lateral 60. 00 Each
14 Water service 560. 00 Each
15 Sewer manhole 81. 00 Each
16 Sewer Clean out 82. 00 Each
17 Water line Hot Tap 174. 00 Each
Includes the water
main run in r/w
18 Storm Drain Inlet 189. 00 Each
19 Storm Drain Connector pipe 145. 00 Each
20 Parkway drain 581. 00 Each
21 Fire Hydrant 270. 00 Each
22 Air Vac blow off 5103. 00 Each
23 Street Tree 560. 00 Each
24 Street name & traffic sign 60. 00 Each
25 Dye Test 5104. 00 Each
26 Penalty for work w/ o permit 244. 00
Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee
595.2 1% 95. 00 37%
542. 84 0% 543. 00 N/ A
595.2 1% 595. 00 37%

18. 79 1% 19. 00 N/ A
148. 20 0% 148. 00 19%
595.2 1% 595. 00 N/ A

95. 52 1% 96. 00 38%
121. 86 1% 5121. 00 33%

95. 52 1% 96. 00 38%
138. 36 0% 5138. 00 25%
173.2 0% 173. 00 53%

42. 84 0% 43. 00 N/ A

90. 32 0% 90. 00 33%
590. 32 0% 590. 00 33%
116. 66 1% 5116. 00 30%
5116. 6 1% 116. 00 29%
5195. 68 0% 195. 00 11%
227.2 0% 5227. 00 17%
5174. 0% 5174. 00 17%
121. 86 1% 121. 00 33%
319. 56 0% 319. 00 15%
253. 56 1% 5250. 0 59%
595.2 1% 595. 00 37%
595.2 1% 95. 00 37%
144. 00 0% 5144. 00 28%
NA NA x 2 permit fee NA
City of Banning User Fee Study Engineering Fees
683
Engineering
27 Overtime inspection 154. 00
28 Re - Inspection Fee 1. 5 x time spent
Excavation permit
Description Current Fee/ Charge Unit
1 Individual project ( parallel to street) 5189. 00
2 Individual project ( across the street) 188. 00
Preliminary Project Review
Description Current Fee/ Charge Unit
1 Specific Plan - preliminary 3, 871. 00
2 Specific Plan amendment - preliminary 2, 540. 0
E. I.R - preliminary 52, 862. 00
Drainage study 51, 240. 0
5 Soils Report New
6 WQMP Review Deposit 53, 000. Deposit
7 Traffic study 2, 504. 00
8 Tentative parcel map - preliminary 51, 843. 00
9 Tentative tract map - preliminary 52,31. 00
10 Tent map- (MH, RV)- preliminary 2, 360. 0
11 Tent Comm/ Indus parcel > 4 lots- preliminary 2, 429. 00 12 Site Plan 289. 00
13 Plot Plan 289. 00
14 Condominium - preliminary 51, 023.0
15 Consultant service - preliminary
184. 00 + consultant' s
fee
Final Map Review
Description Current Fee/ Charge
4, 885. 00
Unit
1 Final map - 0 - 50 lots
City of Banning User Fee Study
5210. 72 NA 75% of permit fee NA
NA NA 25% of permit fee NA
Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee
5227. 22 0% 227. 00 38
5227. 22 0% 227. 00 539
Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee
Deposit 5, 000. Deposit
Deposit 53, 000. Deposit
Deposit 5, 000. Deposit
2, 742. 19 2% 52, 800. 0 56%
52, 742. 19 52, 800. 0 N/ A
Deposit 3, 000. Deposit
52, 800. 97 0% 2, 800. 0 11%
52, 238. 97 0% 2,38. 00 18%
53, 130. 97 0% 3, 130. 0 19%
53, 130. 97 0% 53, 130. 0 25%
2, 909. 54 0% 52, 909. 00 17%
5360. 91 0% 360. 00 20%
5392. 15 0% 392. 00 26%
51, 210.4 0% 1, 210. 0 15%
NA
10% over
consultants fee
NA
Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee
57, 411. 56 0% 7, 420. 0 34%
Engineering Fees
684
Engineering
2 Final map - 51 or more lots
58, 159. 00 +$70. 00 per
lot
per add' tlot
over50
3 Third check up -final 5914. 00
4 Certificate of Correction - final 836. 00
5 Amend Map -final 932. 00
6 Consultant service - final
fee
5183. 00 + consultant' s
Deposit
Grading
Description Current Fee/ Charge Unit
1 Rough grading 1-5 sheets 1, 734. 00
2 Rough grading 6-9 sheets 2, 843. 00
3 Rough grading 10- 20 sheets 54, 691. 00
Rough grading per sheet above 20 sheets New
Precise Grading 0- 49 lots 51, 249. 00
6 Precise Grading Per lot over 49 lots New
7 Grading/ Stockpile Permit 51- 100 CY 45. 00
8 Grading/ Stockpile Permit 101-, 000 CY 545. 00
Plus $ 21 for every 100
cy or fraction thereof
9 Grading/ Stockpile Permit 1, 001- 10, 00 CY 230. 00
Plus $ 25 for every
1, 000 cy or fraction
thereof
10 Grading/ Stockpile Permit 10, 001- 100, 000 CY 380. 00 Plus $ 75 for every
10, 000 cy or fraction
thereof
11 Grading/ Stockpile Permit 100, 01 or more CY 51, 075.0 Plus $ 85 for every
10, 000 cy or fraction
thereof
12, 561. 76
55, 991. 00+ 590. 00
per lot
2168
5949. 34 0% 5950. 0 4%
5999. 0 0% 51, 000. 16%
51, 092.4 0% 1, 095.0 15%
NA NA
10% over
consultant
NA
Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee
52, 485. 3 0% 2, 490. 0 30%
3, 816. 60 0% 53, 820. 0 26%
7, 042. 81 0% 7, 050. 33%
59, 047. 18
57, 050 + $250 per
sheet
N/ A
52,54. 62 0% 2, 554. 00 51%
2, 477. 29
52,54. 00+ 540. 00
per lot
N/ A
552. 68 1% 52. 00 13%
552. 68 1% 52. 00 13%
293.2 0% 5293. 00 22%
492. 51 0% 5492. 00 23%
51, 383. 60 0% 1, 383. 00 22%
City of Banning User Fee Study Engineering Fees
685
Engineering
Inspections
8 Description Current Fee/ Charge Unit
1 Inspections - Subdivision Developments 4% of est. constr. costs 2 Industrial Waste Inspection 175. 00
3 NPDES Inspection 110. 00 per lot
Final Parcel Map
if Description Current Fee/ Charge Unit
1 P. C. Final Map - 1st Sheet Variable
1st Sheet
Only
2 P. C. Final Map - Additional sheet Variable
Each
Add' tSheet
scellaneous Fees
Description Current Fee/ Charge Unit
1 Flood Zone Development 705. 00
2 Encroachment permit 352. 00
3 Over sized/ wight permit (Caltrans Rate) 16. 00 Per Trip 4 Reimbursement agreement 1, 056.0 Each
5 Dedication Document 224. 00 Each
6 Street Abandonment 435. 00 Each
7 Service Letter 63. 00 Each
8 Lot Line Adjustment 619. 00 Each
9 Lot Merger 5619. 00 Each
10 Certificate of Compliance 653. 00 Each
11 Plan Storage & GIS Maintenance Fee 12. 00 per sheet
12a 24" x 36" or Smaller Printout 512. 00 per sheet
12b 24" x 36" or Smaller Printout 12. 00 per sheet
13 Appeals to City Council or Planning Commission 543. 00 Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee
NA NA
4% of est. constr.
costs
NA
NA NA
Consultant costs +
10%
NA
158. 04 0% 158. 00 30%
Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee
2,64. 92 0% 2,75. 00 NA
5807. 24 0% 810. 00 NA
Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee
1, 093. 5 0% 1, 095.0 36%
218. 39 0% 218. 00 61%

15. 62 2% 16. 00 0%
51, 084. 0% 1, 084.0 3%
407. 33 1% 410. 00 45%
1,68. 32 0% 1,70. 0 63%
595. 17 0% 95. 00 34%
5814. 67 0% 5814. 00 24%
5814. 67 0% 5814. 00 24%
814. 67 0% 5814. 00 20%

22. 75 1% 23. 00 48%
519. 37 3% 20. 00 40%
510. 12 1% 10. 00 20%
639. 19 0% 5639. 00 15%
City of Banning User Fee Study Engineering Fees
686
Engineering
14 Landscape Maintenance District - Annexation 3, 986. 00 15 Assessment/ Mello Roos District Deposit 510, 00 min
16 Technology
Surcharge New
Sf
k=
e
0 3s'r'':, iYi h".
1 Improvement Plan Review: 1- 5 Sheets New
2 Improvement Plan Review: 5- 10 Sheets New
3 Improvement Plan Review: 10- 20 Sheets New
4 Improvement Plan Review: 20+ Sheets New
City of Banning
NA NA 3, 986. 00 NA
NA NA 510, 00 min NA

2.5%
51, 185. 23 NA 51, 235. 00 NA
3, 499. 22 NA 3, 650. 0 NA
55, 405. 66 NA 5, 705. 00 NA
58, 132. 69 NA 58,35. 00 NA
User Fee Study Engineering Fees
687

EXHIBIT B

NOTICE OF EXEMPTION
688
Notice of Exemption Appendix E
To: Office of Planning and Research
P. O. Box 3044, Room 212
Sacramento, CA 95812- 3044
County Clerk
County of Riverside
P. O. Box 751
Riverside, CA 92502- 0751
Project Title:

From:

City of Banning
99E. Ramsey Street
P. O. Box 998
Banning, CA 92220
Ordinance No. 1553, amending Chapter 3.6 and adopting Resolution No. 2019- 13 Project Applicant: City of Banning; 99 East Ramsey Street, Banning, CA, 92220 Project Location — Specific:

All parcels; all properties; in the City of Banning
Project Location — City: City of Banning
Description of Nature, Purpose and Beneficiaries of Project:

Project Location — County: Riverside County
City of Banning, CA
Name of Public Agency Approving Project:

Name of Person or Agency Carrying Out Project:

City of Banning
City of Banning
Exempt Status: ( check one)
Ministerial ( Sec. 21080( b)( 1): 15268);
Declared Emergency ( Sec. 21080( b)( 3); 15269( a));
Emergency Project ( Sec. 21080( b)( 4): 15269( b)( c))• Categorical Exemption. State type and section number:

O Statutory Exemptions. State code number:

Reasons why project is exempt:

Section' s15378( b)( 4) and 15273( a)( 1) and (2)
The project does not have the potential for resulting in either a direct physical change in the environment or a
reasonably foreseeable indirect change in the environment.

Lead Agency City of Banning
Contact Person: Adam Rush Area Code/ Telephone/ Extension: (951) 922- 3131 If filed by applicant:

Attach certified document of exemption finding.

2. Has a Notice of Exemption been filed by the public agency approving the project? ® Yes No Signature: Date: 12-0-9 Title: Community Development Director x Signed by Lead Agency
0 Signed by Applicant Date received for tiling at OPR:

Authority cited: Sections 21083 and 21110, Public Resources Code.

Reference: Sections 21108, 21152, and 21152. 1, Public Resources Code.

Revised 2011
689

CITY OF BANNING

STAFF REPORT
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Douglas Schulze, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Lincoln Bogard, Administrative Services Director Lincoln Bogard, Administrative Services Director
MEETING DATE: March 26, 2024
SUBJECT: Consideration of Whether to Conduct a Citywide Forensic Investigation and, if so, Select a Finalist from the Request for Proposals for Citywide Forensic Investigation Services
RECOMMENDATION:

Confirm the City Council's consensus to engage a firm to perform a citywide forensic investigation of Treasury functions with a focus on cash and, if so, select one of the finalist firms that submitted a proposal in response to the Request for Proposals for Citywide Forensic Investigation Services and direct the City Manager to negotiate an agreement with the selected firm for the City Council's future consideration.

BACKGROUND:

The City hired a new Finance Director on June 23, 2022. Fiscal Year 2021-22 ended on June 30, 2022.

As a part of the year-end close process and completion of the audited financial statements, the Finance Director determined that the Electric Utility had approximately $4 million in unrestricted cash at fiscal year end. In approximately October 2022, the City Manager, Finance Director, and Deputy Finance Director held discussions with the then Electric Utility Director, about the low levels of cash reserves at the electric utility. The Council determined that the Electric Utility would maintain an unrestricted cash reserve of $11 million. The audited financial statements confirmed that $4 million level of unrestricted cash. Continuing conversations occurred over the remainder of FY 2022-23, and the Finance Director (now Administrative Services Director) conducted a much more thorough analysis as the departments unrestricted cash ultimately moved negative department-wide in March and April of 2023. When the Administrative Services Director brought the June 30, 2023, negative unrestricted cash balance of approximately $9 million (later revised based on year-end GASB 31 entries to negative $8.6 million) to the City Manager, we agreed on the critical importance of reporting the results to Council. The analysis was presented to Council in a Special Session on August 15, 2023. Also in August, we moved forward with contracting GHJ Associates to perform a Phase 1 forensic investigation into the results of operations since 2018. Council expanded the scope of the forensic investigation twice. The final results were presented to Council and the public on February 27, 2024.

The forensic investigation confirmed the reporting that was made to Council on August 15, 2023. That meeting can be viewed online and is accessible from the City’s website. The majority of cash spend related to capital asset construction and was approved by Council as a part of the Capital Improvement Plan. While there were issues of non-conformance with procurement policy issues, Council retroactively approved all instances identified, and no allegations of fraud were noted in the forensic investigation.

Almost all areas of concern from a financial operations perspective can be identified through a thorough analysis of cash. Ultimately, the Electric Utility unrestricted cash balances decreased by over $30M 690
Evaluation Criteria
Criteria Weight (Points)
Qualifications 25 (25% of Total)
Pricing 25 (25% of Total)
Experience (Projects of similar size and
scope)
25 (25% of Total)
Professional References 10 (10% of Total)
Approach and Methodology 10 (10% of Total)
Value Added Services 5 (5% of Total)
Aggregate Scores Summary
Vendor Evaluator 1
Evaluator
2 Evaluator
3 Evaluator 4 Evaluator 5
Evaluator
6 Total
Score
(Max
Score
100)
during Mr. Miller’s tenure (2018-2024, and as of June 30, 2023).

When Council and the public were informed about the cash decline that electric incurred over the last five years, some Councilmembers and residents expressed a desire to have a Citywide investigation performed. The Administrative Services Director stated that no other issues were identified in his Citywide analysis, but that he and the City Manager were agreeable to a Citywide investigation into treasury functions (cash in particular). The Administrative Services Director obtained Council approval to issue a Request for Proposals (RFP) for this investigation. Staff also recommended that the evaluation of submissions be conducted by Finance Directors from other area local governments in the Pass Area and Coachella Valley. Council approved and those Finance Directors and the elected City Treasurer for the City of Banning conducted the evaluation of the six proposals submitted for consideration.

JUSTIFICATION:

When the final results of the forensic investigation of the electric utility were presented to Council on February 27, 2024, several members of Council and the public expressed concern that the City Council had authorized $153,000 for the investigation that had not identified much more than the Finance Director (Administrative Services Director) presented to Council and the public on August 15, 2023.

Staff is aware that the cost of a Citywide forensic investigation of cash will likely cost as much as or several times more than the electric utility investigation, depending on the number of Phases approved by Council. If no other areas of concern are identified the cost could be as low as the electric investigation.

Council conducted interviews with the top three evaluated firms (Marsh Minick, P.C., FORVIS, LLP, and BDO USA, P.C.) on February 27, 2024. The initial round of scoring results of all firms are below. City staff provided the Council with the proposals and asked the Council to score the firms prior to this meeting and the top-rated firm will be disclosed to Council at this meeting for potential approval of initiating a contract.
691
Marsh
Minick,
P.C.
89 84 95 94 86 83 88.5

FORVIS,
LLP
87 85 89 90 89 86 87.67

BDO USA,
P.C.
85 86 91 89 97 59 84.5
GHJ
Advisors
83 87 81.5 81 99 62 82.25
McKenzie
Forensic
Auditors,
Inc.
72 80 77 87 90 58 77.33
Engel &
Engel, LLP

42.5 63 45 78 75 34 56.25
Vendor Scores By Evaluation Criteria
Vendor
Qualifications
(25 Points)
Pricing
(25
Points)
Experience
(25 Points)
Professional
References
(10 Points)
Approach
and
Methodology
(10 Points)
Value
Added
Services
(5 Points)
Total
Score
(Max
Score
100)
Marsh
Minick,
P.C.

24.2 19.5 24.3 8.3 8.7 3.5 88.5

FORVIS,
LLP

24.2 16.3 24.2 9.7 9.2 4.2 87.67

BDO USA,
P.C.

20.7 20 21.5 9 8.5 4.8 84.5
GHJ
Advisors

23.3 17.9 20.3 8.7 7.7 4.3 82.25
McKenzie
Forensic
Auditors,
Inc.

21.5 22 18.7 6.7 6.7 1.8 77.33
Engel &
Engel, LLP
19 7.7 14.5 7.2 6.8 1.1 56.25
FISCAL IMPACT:

If no firm is chosen and staff is directed to perform a deeper dive there will be no fiscal impact except staff time.

Phase 1 services will be as identified in the selected proposal.

If a Phase 2 is contracted that will likely cost four to six times as much as Phase 1, if not already identified in the selected proposal.

Any additional phases would be at the direction of Council and would be priced at that time if requested.
692
ALTERNATIVES:

1. Take no action to complete a citywide forensic investigation.

2. Take no action to complete a citywide forensic investigation and task staff with additional research and presentation to Council.

3. Select a firm from the three finalist firms previously interviewed by the City Council to enter into a contract for a forensic investigation of Treasury functions with a focus on cash. (Staff will negotiate the agreement with the selected firm and bring to Council at the earliest regular City Council meeting possible.)

4. Provide alternative direction to staff.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Marsh_Minick_Proposal.pdf

2. FORVIS_Proposal.pdf

3. BDO_USA_Proposal.pdf
693
1 | Page
November 21, 2023
This Proposal is in response to the Request for Proposals (“RFP-23-040”) by the City of Banning (“City”) for Forensic Accounting and Investigation Services. This Proposal was prepared by Marsh Minick, P.C. a firm that specializes in forensic auditing (“Marsh Minick”).

Scope and Work Summary Marsh Minick understands that the City is needing forensic audit services on the financial activity of the City’s Treasury functions starting January 1, 2018 to June 30, 2023. The forensic audit proposal includes the following work:
• Phase 1: Examination of the City’s Treasury functions, including primary revenue collection, to assess whether there are conditions and predicate to perform investigative services (Phase 2) • Phase 2: Investigative services may be warranted for potential instances of mismanagement, fraud, waste, abuse, or other serious violation, depending on the outcome of (Phase 1) Examination of the City’s Treasury Functions.
• Deliverables for the forensic audit will include and an immediate an oral briefing of findings and observations to the City Manager, City Council, and City Legal Counsel. Additionally, a fact-based report of findings that includes quantification of harm and evidence that substantiate the findings and observations. Recommendations will also be provided for improvements.

Best and Most Qualified Firm Marsh Minick is a specialized audit firm that solely practices forensic auditing and investigation service engagements. Our clients are government and publically funded agencies, including cities and other entities that are recipients of public funding. Marsh Minick’s forensic audit team is highly qualified, capable and skilled in this field with over 20 years of experience. Forensic auditors each have advanced master’s degrees in financial forensic, bachelor’s degrees in accounting and management, and specialized credentials as fraud examiners and financial crime investigators (CFE and CFCI).

The firm’s Principal owners personally render services. Marsh Minick provides nationwide services. We are a certified women owned small business. Marsh Minick are willing to enter into a contract under the terms and conditions prescribed by the RFP and sample agreement.

Your Point of Contact for Services is: Melisa Frick Minick, MS, CFE, CFCI Email: [email protected], Phone: (971) 266-1846 in Pacific Standard Time We entrust you will find this proposal informative. Thank you for your time and consideration.

Sincerely,
Marsh Minick, P.C.

Brand Marsh Melissa Frick Minick
694
1 | Page
VB-A: Proposal for Forensic Accounting and Investigation Services Marsh Minick specializes in conducting forensic auditing and investigation services. Our approach is to be independent fraud examiners and financial crime investigators. We rely on fact-based evidence gathered during the forensic audit for the resulting findings. Marsh Minick conducts risk-based forensic audits, which will encompass all of the City’s Treasury financial activities. The examination will target areas of concern where the greatest likelihood of risk and magnitude of problems may exist. Targeted risk-based forensic auditing is the superior approach as it focuses scrutiny into the most likely problem areas, delves into problem areas most worthy of forensic audit attention, and also maximizes efforts to achieve objectives.

Objectives and Scope of Work
The objectives of the forensic accounting and investigation services are to:
• Phase 1: Examination of the City’s Treasury functions, including primary revenue collection, to assess whether there are conditions and predicate to perform investigative services (Phase 2) o General review the City’s revenue transactions, deposits, financial system (NaviLine by Central Square) and banking activity for all Departments, Utility Authority, Successor to Former RDA, and other fiduciary and custodial funds
o Cursory examination all Treasury financial activity for receiving, investing, and disbursing monies in accordance with state statutes
o Basic assessment of information to substantiate transactions that have occurred in the City’s Funds, such records or data about revenue deposited, collection logs and receipts, purchase orders, contracts, invoices, disbursements, approvals and authorizations, and other information that is identified
o Preview governance documentation such as City Resolutions and Ordinances, policies, procedures, meeting agendas, meeting minutes and notes
o Collection of other pertinent information for financials as warranted and identified during the examination, such as computerized files, emails, and formal memorandums o Performance of information gathering interviews with individuals who processed and oversaw financial controls in the City’s Treasury, and other knowledgeable individuals such as figureheads, department heads, and subject-matter experts at the City • Phase 2: Investigative services may be warranted for potential instances of mismanagement, fraud, waste, abuse, or other serious violation, depending on the outcome of (Phase 1) Examination of the City’s Treasury Functions.
o In-depth review of the City’s financial activity and transactions that appear to have irregularities or inconsistencies
o Risk-based examination that is focused on the areas of greatest risk and likelihood of potential wrongdoing to identify whether incidents exist of a particular scheme that may have caused harm
o Forensic testing of transactions and information through investigative probing of the 695
2 | Page

area(s) of risk to reveal corroborating and consistency in results o Collection of additional pertinent information for financials as needed to support examination and forensic testing efforts, which will be based on the areas of risk o Performance of forensic and admission seeking interviews with individuals who may have direct first-hand knowledge or information about potential wrongdoing • Deliverable for the forensic audit will include:
o An immediate an oral briefing of findings and observations to the City Manager, City Council, and City Legal Counsel
o A fact-based report of findings that includes quantification of harm and evidence that substantiate the findings and observations
o Consulting and recommendations for improvement will be provided in an effort to prevent future reoccurring instances of problems
o Availability for follow-up actions such as court testimony or law enforcement support Predicate
The predicate for the forensic accounting and investigative services will be discussed with the City during the introductory meeting. Predicate for the forensic examination will involve a potential risk of financial loss or mishandling from known or suspected incidents or allegations of possible wrongdoing. Predicate can include situations where there is financial uncertainty, such as financial activity that does not seem to make sense; where there may be situations of financial reports out of balance, money is misplaced or missing, financials not fully or properly transacted, concerns about compliance, or other unusual activity or abnormality that causes suspicion.

Scope Period
The scope period is January 1, 2018 to June 30, 2023.

Forensic Audit Approach: Phases 1 and 2
The accounting and investigative approach from beginning to conclusion are as follows:

Planning & Information Gathering
Planning and introductory meetings to assess concerns, risks, and collect initial data readily available about the predicate and scope of work services
Request, obtain, collect, and review information from the City, including records, files, and data that is in paperbased and electronic-based formats; examples are financial system export, ledgers, and emails Conduct interviews with individuals that may have first-hand information, including former and current City officials, employees, or contractors, and collect any information they may have additionally 696
3 | Page

Perform investigative inquiries in special access and public databases and online websites (such as the internet archive and social media posts); obtain information from other public entities as needed (such as FOIA); and locate other information retained external to the City (such as vendor and contractor files) Assessment, Analysis and Testing
* May continue interviewing and information gathering as needed to complete analysis and tests Review governing, compliance, and risk related documents that require adherence, including City Resolutions, Ordinances, policies, procedures, agreements and contracts Review financial and Fund data, accounts, ledgers, transactions, reports, management and operational records, and other identified supporting communications, information, data, and documentation that is generated during the handling of financials at the City
Perform forensic analysis and evidence-based testing of the totality of information gathered to identify instances of errors, possible non-compliance, and if there are any suspicious transactions that may be fraud, waste, abuse, misconduct, other wrongdoing, or mismanagement
Deliverables
Report of Findings that is comprehensive about the major incidents or problem areas, calculation of the dollar amount of financial impacts, quantification and extent of the findings, and fact-based evidence Recommendations for improvement based on problem incidents and areas from the report of findings Report of Findings and Recommendations will be provided on a USB drive and will include a digital recorded video of an oral summary of the results
Verbal debrief or summary of the Report of Findings through a live virtual or in person meeting, or present in a City Council Meeting
Approach: Planning and Information Gathering
Marsh Minick will begin the forensic audit with an introductory meeting held with the City contact person(s) and other key individuals. The agenda for the introductory meetings will include a discussion about predicate, specific goals, areas of interest and concern, review of the approach and timeline, and any other important information at the onset of the forensic audit.

Marsh Minick will perform onsite information gathering at the City offices and information gathering can be performed from Marsh Minick offices and done remotely. How the information is gathered, whether onsite or remotely, will be based upon the availability and condition of records, as well as City staff effort and availability capacities. Marsh Minick will provide an information request checklist to begin gathering documents, records, and data. The anticipated information to be requested and collected on the checklist will be necessary to perform a lookback at financial system Funds and accounts, statements, financial records, meetings minutes, and other relevant documentation that occurred in the scope period. 697
4 | Page
Additionally, governance documentation will be requested such as applicable Resolutions and Ordinances, along with other pertinent information like contracts.

Marsh Minick will perform interviews with select individuals that have first-hand information that is relevant to the forensic audit, which may include current and former Board members, Officials, Department heads, employees, individuals responsible for financial management, contractors, and/or individuals with relevant information or allegations. Additional information will be gathered as needed from websites, such as the City website, public databases of information, or investigative queries.

Approach: Assessment, Analysis, and Testing
Marsh Minick will review and analyze the information gathered and perform forensic audit testing that is specific and customized for the City’s situation. Forensic analysis and tests will reveal the validity and accuracy of financial records, and allow Marsh Minick to examine transactions for the risk of financial misconduct or fraud. There will also be an evaluation of governance, compliance, and risk practices that will reveal the root cause and reason behind the financial issues.

During the Forensic Examination phase, Marsh Minick will review and analyze the information gathered and perform forensic audit testing that is specific and customized for the City’s situation. Forensic analysis and tests will be planned and devised specifically to examine fraud risks, allegations, complaints, grievances, and problem areas. The forensic analysis and tests will be fact-based on the evidence, and results will reveal the validity and accuracy of financials. Marsh Minick will investigate financial activity that may be caused by noncompliance, mismanagement, misconduct, waste, abuse or fraud. The evidence examined will reveal the causes of the problem(s), and the forensic analysis and testing will quantify the magnitude and impact of any suspicious activity detected. Forensic examination may include, but is not limited to:
• Perform risk-based forensic testing where the greatest likelihood of fraud risk is expected. • Perform tests with compliance of contractual obligations and agreements to financial transactions. • Perform tests on Fund transactions and financial records, including, revenue and disbursements, bank and financial institution information.
• Perform tests based on the abnormalities, incidents, and allegations that predicated the forensic audit, such as accusations identified during information gathering.

Approach: Deliverables
Marsh Minick will prepare an extensive concluding fact-based report that details the findings that forensic auditors have determined are reportable and will include supporting evidence within the report. The findings will be quantified to reveal the extent of problems, such as frequency of problem instances, and calculation financial impact. Additionally, the findings will reveal the causes of the problems and identify individuals and organizations that appeared to be the wrongdoers. Marsh Minick delivers the findings report electronically, and will not print report(s) unless there is a specific request by the City for printing/shipping. Recommendations, verbal summary or debrief are provided. 698
5 | Page

Communications
There will be a status report provided by Marsh Minick every two weeks to communicate the audit’s progress. The status report will detail progress and upcoming activities, preliminary information and findings when possible, and project financial updates. The status report will go to the forensic audit point of contact(s), and may also include a telephone or virtual meeting as needed.

Marsh Minick is cognizant that a forensic audit may feel like an annoyance; therefore, the audit team commits to working independently with minimal disruptions as possible. If an issue arises, Marsh Minick will immediately reach out to the City and make suggestions for resolution.

Timeline
Marsh Minick has prepared a project schedule to complete the work services.

Phases January 2024 February 2024 March 2024 April 2024 May 2024 Phase 1
Phase 2
Deliverables
699
6 | Page
VB-B to E: Company Information, Personnel, Disclosure, Experience & Reference Firm Profile
Marsh Minick, P.C. specializes in forensic auditing, internal control evaluations, risk and compliance assessments, and financial investigation consulting for governmental and publicly funded agencies.

Marsh Minick has one office and is domiciled in Portland, Oregon and provides nationwide services. Work is performed from our office, and at the client’s worksite when needed, which will be determined at the onset of the engagement. We are an Oregon registered women business enterprise, emerging small business, and disadvantaged business enterprise (COBID #10212) company; additionally we are certified by the federal government for being a women-owned small business.

About Marsh Minick, P.C.

Forensic auditing services are personally rendered and delivered by the firm’s principal owners, Brandi Marsh and Melissa Frick Minick. Resumes are included at the conclusion of this proposal.

The auditors were professionally trained in this field together and have been working as a team for 20 years’ (since 2003) performing financial forensics. The firm, Marsh Minick, P.C., was formed in 2013 and the practice was established in 2015. Marsh Minick are an effective auditing team because of working so closely in partnership for so long, and are skilled forensic auditors with a track record of completing highly complex forensic audit services.

The principal owners are the sole practitioners at Marsh Minick with the support of one administrative professional. The practitioners have earned the following certifications:
• Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (CFE)
• International Association of Financial Crime Investigators (CFCI) • Association of Certified Anti-Money Laundering Specialists (CAMS) • Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI) Citizens Academy 700
7 | Page

The principal owners at Marsh Minick each hold educational Degrees in the following:

Brandi Marsh, MS, CAMS, CFE, CFCI
• Bachelor’s in Accounting, Eastern Oregon University, La Grande, OR • Master’s in Fraud and Forensics (GPA 4.0), Carlow University, Pittsburgh, PA Melissa Frick Minick, MS, CFE, CFCI
• Bachelor’s in Business, Eastern Oregon University, La Grande, OR • Master’s in Fraud and Forensics (GPA 3.97), Carlow University, Pittsburgh, PA Copies of degrees and transcripts are available upon request.

Firm and Personnel Experiences
Marsh Minick is experienced with conducting forensic auditing, risk and compliance services for government entities and publicly-funded organizations. Marsh Minick has performed forensic auditsin the past under high pressure and scrutiny by the public, and which affects public programs, officials and employees. We have experience forensic auditing when there is financial mismanagement, waste, abuse, and financial crimes that have occurred. Marsh Minick’s forensic audits always start with a predicate, such as situations where amounts of funds are unknown, uncertain, lacking transparency, missing, unaccounted for, wrongly tracked, out of balance, underperforming, or allegations of suspicious activity when money is misused or stolen.
701
8 | Page
Audits previously conducted by Marsh Minick normally involve complex financials that require forensic review, analysis, testing, verification, reconstruction and recalculation of transactions, accounts, statements, and other financial documentation. In many cases, Marsh Minick must utilize investigative techniques to obtain, locate and recover lost and destroyed records, and originals of manipulated financial documentation. Marsh Minick evaluates governance, compliance, risk and controls for functionality and effectiveness as part of forensic audits, which provides the root cause and reasons for how the situation came about leading to the examination. Typically Marsh Minick discovers during audits that there are conflicts among parties, such as oversight bodies, public officials and employees that includes disagreements, grievances, allegations, and political motivations, which Marsh Minick works through those obstacles to get all tasks completed.

Throughout forensic audits we have conducted in the past, Marsh Minick communicates with the contact person and provides a status report every-two-weeks that details progress and upcoming activities, preliminary information and findings when possible, and project financial updates.

Deliverables are always a fact-based report of findings that contains all auditing procedures performed, forensic testing and analysis results, and reconstruction of critical financials. Additional deliverables are recommendations for improvement that are meaningful and practical to implement, and a video containing an oral summary of the results and deliverables.

List of Former Clients and Samples of Prior Audit Reports Marsh Minick’s prior work services have been trusted by all forms of government entities and agencies, and organizations receiving public-funding. To demonstrate Marsh Minick’s firm knowledge and experience, a select list of former and current clients is provided, along with a description of the work performed. Marsh Minick has completed similar work services in the past as being proposed for the City, including having performed services pertaining to the following highlighted in the client list:
• Forensic auditing
• Examinations and evaluations of documents, records, and data • Financial forensics of funds, income, grants and endowments • Reconstruction and validation of financials and accounting funds • Governance, risk, compliance, and control assessments • Services previously performed in similar scope or relatable topic Samples of reports and other deliverable materials previously completed by Marsh Minick have been published online by past governmental clients and/or news media. Most of Marsh Minick’s concluding reports are thorough often approximately 100 pages in length, encompassing the audit procedures, analysis and test findings, reconstruction of financials, and recommendations. Marsh Minick requests the City review the online samples of past work provided in the links below as part of the evaluation of our qualifications. Two references are provided below. If additional references are needed, please feel free to contact Marsh Minick.
702
9 | Page

Type of Client Examples of Past and Present Forensic and Audit Work Services Performed Housing
Authorities
Washoe Housing Authority - Washoe Tribe of Nevada and California Forensic Audit of the Housing Authority funds from federal block grants, HUD grants, and capital investment project funds endowed for construction projects and maintenance of Tribal community residential housing. Forensic testing was complex because of the multitude of grant drawdowns and regulatory compliance and legal stipulations for financial expenditures. There was a risk and controls assessment performed as part of the examination. Findings were that $5.4 to $6.6 million dollars in funding was mismanaged, which should have gone towards public housing development and construction. There was abuse of power and nepotism pertaining to construction contracts to build public housing. Findings were delivered to the Board of the Housing Authority, as well as Tribal Council for the Tribal Community. Improvement after the forensic audit was transparency to the community, and Tribal fulfillment of regulatory requirements for accepting and spending federal money.

Hazlehurst Housing Authority for the City of Hazlehurst, Mississippi Forensic Audit of the public Housing Authority financials including rent receipts from tenants, funds endowed by City, and HUD grants. Significant and critical financial records and documents had been intentionally manipulated and destroyed to cover-up stealing by the Executive Director. Forensic audit required locating and reconstructing financial records in alternative methods, such as contacting vendors and credit card companies for statements and invoices, forcing a password reset on the Executive Director’s computer files and emails, obtaining financial records previously provided to other auditors and regulatory agencies. The financial impact discovered by the forensic audit findings was $748,500 had been mismanaged and also stolen through embezzlement by the Executive Director for personal purchases. The U.S. HUD and DOJ convicted the Executive Director in federal court for stealing over $50,000. .

News about the Criminal Conviction by the US DOJ and HUD:
https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdms/pr/former-housing-authority-director-pleads-guilty-stealing-federal-funds Cascadia Housing, Inc. (Cascadia Behavioral Healthcare Housing Resources), Portland, Oregon Forensic Audit of the public Housing and Properties financials after fraudulent transactions had been discovered in their Yardi Account, which was an account only to be used for depositing rent payments from tenants of the public housing units. Performed information gathering of bank account records and financial system data, along with examination of transactions flagged as fraudulent. Conducted interviews with Housing staff and management familiar with the public housing unit and financial processes, including the Agency’s Financial Controller of funds.

Identified that one of the tenants residing in the public housing unit has used the account’s routing and account number to make fraudulent purchases online for precious metals and jewelry (gold and diamonds). Prepared a written report for the Housing management to report the incident to HUD and state and local grant programs administrators related to the financial losses and transactions, as well as internal control conditions that led to the delayed identification of the fraud, and recommendations for improvement. Coordinated the Housing Authority police report and investigation by Portland Police Financial Crimes Unit.

City
Governments
City of Portland’s Office of Community and Civic Life
Forensic Audit of a Neighborhood District that Marsh Minick discovered had mismanaged $179k of public money granted by the City and through public endowments for residential and 703
10 | Page

commercial community services. The publicly funded Neighborhood District also had federal Paycheck Payment Protection Act (PPP) funds received as part of the COVID relief and pandemic. Forensic audit included examination of financial records, board records about meetings, interviews with board and community members, and a financial controls evaluation of the District. The audit revealed fraud had occurred, and there was continuous problems administrating public funding services as obligated and non-compliance. Findings led to the City Council and Commissioner in charge of Civic Life to redirect public funding for more effective community services and programs.

Report to the City:
https://www.opb.org/pdf/Forensic%20Audit%20of%20SWNI_1605822641636.pdf City of Pontiac, Michigan (Reference #1)
Forensic Audit of the entire citywide financials following allegations of wrongdoing by the former Mayor, Finance Director, and Executive Office staff. After a thorough examination the result was $1.627 million impact with evidence of apparent fraudulent use of grant funds, including personal travel, and abuse of power over financials, such as mishandling of contracts, improper invoicing and payments to contractors, and campaign finance violations of law. There was willful non-compliance of contracts and misconduct by the former Mayor, and the Finance Director’s termination followed the forensic audit results.

Report to the City:
https://www.theoaklandpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Forensic-Audit-Findings-Report-andRecommendations-City-of-Pontiac-Reduced-1.pdf City Council Video of Forensic Audit Results on 8-4-22 (segment starts at 29 minutes):
https://youtu.be/YpkpatFq2no
City of Seattle’s Treasury Department
Fraud Risk Assessment and Internal Controls Evaluation after cash was missing from the City’s Treasury vault and cash handling procedures were not being followed. Performed onsite inspection and review of governance and processes. Recommended multiple improvements to the City’s Treasury operations by improving measures and practices to secure public money.

Teacher’s Retirement System of the City of New York
Fraud Risk Assessment and Internal Controls Evaluation of the public pension and retirement funds from City public school and university teachers. Performed surveys and interviews, and determined risk likelihood, significance, and control measures. Recommended improvements to the City’s processes, revised policies and procedures, and delivered training about risk and compliance matters to City employees administrating pension and retirement funds.

County
Governments
Pulaski County Court for Yorkwood Recreational District, Arkansas Forensic Audit ordered by the County Court of a publicly funded community facility in Yorkwood Recreational District. The pool, pool house, tennis court, playground equipment, and local park had been in disrepair and not operable. Findings were that over $50,000 in publicly endowed funds were supposed to be expended on a capital construction project to fix and rebuild the facilities, but the District’s Board had hired and paid non-licensed construction contractors who stole the money and never performed construction work on the facilities. A Board member had been also discovered to have been embezzling funds for “mowing” and other community 704
11 | Page

services that they did not actually perform at the facility. Fulfilled the court order by a judge in the County for public transparency and community awareness of the District’s financial situation as a result of the financial mismanagement and fraud losses.

Karnes County Judge, California (Reference #2)
Forensic Audit of the financials for all County offices, which were being handled by the County Treasurer and County Auditor’s Offices. The examination included highly complex financial reconstruction and recalculation of numerous county funds and investments, including oil and gas. Findings were that $39 million of County funds and investments had been mismanaged, compliance and risk controls were not functional. Improved transparency of financial affairs, and provided recommendations and guidance for how to remediate issues.

Saline County Board, Illinois
Forensic Audit of County Clerk and Recorder’s Office regarding financial mismanagement of public funds from County income from services and taxes. Forensic audit included a risk assessment. Findings included misappropriation of all County funds. There was highly complex taxation, fund, and financial movements that was examined as part of this audit. Improved transparency for financial affairs at the County.

Report to the County Board:
https://thesouthern.com/view-the-full-forensic-audit-of-saline-county-clerks-office/pdf_ea6de65e-2f06-53ab88bd-61e775356bec.html State
Government
Oregon Secretary of State’s Audit Division
Fraud Investigation of State’s Business Energy Tax Credit Program, which was administrated by the Oregon Department of Energy. A highly complex examination to validate, verify, and reconstruct financials for 4,000 renewable energy projects in a $2.4 billion dollar tax credit program. Conducted interviews of over 40 individuals. Findings were that $347 million dollars in projects that had concerning financials. Recommendations were implemented by the State in phases. Additionally, there was a criminal conviction for fraud and conspiracy.

Report to the Secretary of State:
http://media.oregonlive.com/politics_impact/other/20160907165604113[5].pdf Report to the Department of Justice:
http://media.oregonlive.com/business_impact/other/ODOJ%20report.pdf News about the Criminal Conviction:
https://www.justice.gov/usao-or/pr/seattle-man-pleads-guilty-fraud-conspiracy-involving-former-oregondepartment-energy Federal
Government
U.S. Department of the Treasury – Office of the Comptroller of Currency Anti-Money Laundering Bank Examinations of financial institutions nationwide to oversee compliance with financial regulations. Engage with Bank executives and senior managers to obtain financial documentation and perform interviews. Conduct risk and compliance testing, and other financial forensics necessary to make findings. Provide the US Treasury Examination Supervisor in Charge with a written summary of findings. Meet with Examination team and Bank executives and senior management as needed to explain results of findings.

705
12 | Page

References
Standards
Marsh Minick will perform the audits aligned to Generally Accepted Government Auditing Standards (GAGAS) for forensic auditing. Additionally, Marsh Minick will follow the Association of Certified Fraud Examination (ACFE) methodology for forensic examination. Marsh Minick will first begin by gathering and examining general information, and then narrow down focus to risk and problem areas by gathering more specific information to scrutinize through examination. This forensic audit examination methodology is based on empirical science of observation and experimentation of evidence. Marsh Minick will perform fact-checking of evidence that is forensically examined, such as validate the same document from more than one source, or by repeatedly probing a problem area to experiment whether the results are consistently drawn to form a conclusion (finding). When forensic auditors determine it is sensible, reasonable, and possible, Marsh Minick will perform statistically significant forensic testing of data to achieve 90% to 98% confidence levels, with a 2-10% margin of error.

Disclosure: Conflicts of Interest – Independence Statement Marsh Minick is independent firm with no business or personal dealings in the City of Banning or with the State of California; therefore, Marsh Minick is free from any conflicts of interest and will maintain independence free from any influence and conflicts aligned with government audit standards.

Prior Experience Reference #1
Name City of Pontiac, Michigan
Mr. Khalfani Stephens, Deputy Mayor
[email protected]
Address Pontiac City Hall
47450 Woodward Ave, Pontiac, MI 48342
Time period services provided May 2022 – August 2022
Prior Experience Reference #2
Company Name Karnes County, California
Honorable Judge Wade Hedtke
[email protected]
Company Address 101 North Panna Maria Ave, Suite #101, Karnes City, CA 78118 Time period services provided October 2019 – February 2020 706
1 | Page
VC: Price Proposal for Services Outlined
The all-inclusive maximum price of all indirect and direct costs is $304,000, discounted from the $368,000 calculated on the provided Pricing Form. The breakdown of those costs is as follows:
• Marsh Minick’s firm hourly rates are $250 for forensic auditing services and $75 for administrative services.
• Phase 1: The anticipated effort is expected to be upwards of 960 forensic auditing hours and 480 administrative hours.
• Phase 2: The anticipated effort is expected to be upwards of 320 forensic auditing hours and 160 administrative hours.
• There will be two (2) Forensic Auditors/Investigators and one (1) Administrative Assistant assigned full-time and dedicated for all four (4) months of services to the City • Investigative database or public information queries
• Printing and shipping (only if requested by the City) • USB, CD, or external storage devices
• Travel necessary to fulfill services, include transportation, lodging, mileage, meals and incidentals (M&I) that are aligned with GS&A and IRS rates for location • Any other expenses and costs that arise to fulfill services • All services and costs are billed monthly due date net 30 days • Any consulting services following the forensic audit for law enforcement or court support would be billed following the firms rates and pricing stated above 707
Citywide Forensic Accounting and Investigation Services Submitted by FORVIS, LLP
A proposal for:

City of Banning
Primary Contact
Rand Gambrell, CPA, ABV, CFE, CFF
Managing Director
Phone: 303.837.3594
Email: [email protected]
Secondary Contact
Christie Clements, CISA®, CRMA®
Managing Director
Phone: 317.383.4037
Email: [email protected]

ORIGINAL
RFP-23-040
708
FORVIS is a trademark of FORVIS, LLP, registered with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.

V.A Cover Letter
November 28, 2023
Ms. Barbara Mason
Purchasing Manager
City of Banning
99 E. Ramsey Street
Banning, CA 92220
Dear Ms. Mason:

City of Banning (City) is no stranger to the complex challenges that come with serving the public. Constant regulatory updates and budgetary constraints are just a few of the issues the City has to address as you work to satisfy demand for your services and citizen needs. Navigating this environment can be difficult without a professional services firm with extensive public sector experience to provide helpful guidance and tools you require. FORVIS is here to help.

We have reviewed all elements of the RFP and we understand the Citys request for forensic accounting and investigative services related to all activity of the Citys Treasury functions and stand ready to proceed according to your 4 month timeline.

FORVIS, a new firm combining two established track records of specialized accounting and consulting experience, can provide the City with the service-specific insight and knowledge you deserve. While forensic accounting and investigation services often look alike on paper, the quality and efficiency of the process, timing, and reporting can vary among providers. To the City, FORVIS forensic accounting services can mean the difference between a check-the-box approach and a service process tailored to your specific needs that delivers additional value and proactive advice. Your proposed engagement team has experience working with municipalities and knows they require an understanding of a number of accounting and reporting nuances. We have the experience to help you navigate a complex forensic accounting and investigative project.

Proposed Services for the City
The City has requested information and a fee quote for the following professional services:

Forensic investigation and accounting procedures as necessary to identify, investigate, trace, examine, and quantify all identified abnormal financial activity relating to receipts or disbursements, including tax receipts and distributions for the period January 1, 2018, through June 30, 2023.

Please see A. Statement of Understanding and Approach for detailed explanations of our financial accounting and related service approaches.
77 West University Drive / Mesa, AZ 85201
P 480.834.8030 / F 480.644.9877
forvis.com
709
FORVIS is a trademark of FORVIS, LLP, registered with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.

The FORVIS Difference
Being a top 10 public accounting and professional firm matters, but more so does our commitment to client service and a forward-thinking mindset focused on innovation. We prioritize investing in new technologies to help clients navigate forensic accounting and assessment developments, and we foster a dynamic culture of leadership and professional development. This means the City can work with a forensic investigation and accounting-focused team driven by our forward vision to help you succeed today while helping the City prepare for the future.

Heres what sets us apart:

We will assemble an integrated team of forensic and internal audit/control specialists to address the unique risks and requirements of the City. We will combine our forensic, data analytics, internal control, and public sector experience into a customized approach to your assessment.

FORVIS internal control, forensics, and data analytics team has extensive experience working with state and local governments, assisting our clients in identifying internal control weaknesses and helping detect transactions indicative of potential fraud and abuse. FORVIS takes a proactive approach, assisting clients in strengthening internal deficiencies to help reduce fraud risks.

FORVIS integrated team will include professionals with significant litigation support and testimony experience, providing a seamless transition into dispute consulting should fraudulent transactions and activity be identified.

With a forward vision that drives our Unmatched Client Experiences, FORVIS is driven by a commitment to anticipate whats ahead so that our clients are ready to thrive when it arrives.

Our acceptance of this engagement is subject to completion of our normal client acceptance procedures. Upon acceptance, FORVIS agrees to enter into a mutually agreed upon contract with the City, for the engagement.

We believe our proposal will help you select our firm for efficient and objective services delivered by experienced professionals.

FORVIS single point of contact for the City is Rand Gambrell. Please refer to the signature below for Mr. Gambrells contact information.

Respectfully Presented,
Rand Gambrell, CPA, ABV, CFE, CFF Christie Clements, CISA®, CRMA® Managing Director Managing Director
303.837.3594 317.383.4037
[email protected] [email protected]
710
Citywide Forensic Accounting and Investigation Services Submitted by FORVIS, LLP
A proposal for:

ORIGINAL
RFP-23-040
711
B Proposal 3
Statement of Understanding and Approach 3
Company Information 10
Company Personnel 14
Disclosures 19
Experience and References 19
Appendix 24
Exceptions to Terms and Conditions
25 AICPA Peer Review Letter 26
BKD Peer Review Report 27
About FORVIS 28
Our acceptance of this engagement is subject to completion of our normal client acceptance procedures. Upon acceptance, the actual terms of our engagement will be documented in a separate letter to be signed by you and us. The information provided in this proposal is intended for informational purposes only and may not be copied, used, or modified, in whole or in part, without FORVIS prior written approval. All information in this proposal is as of June 1, 2023, including projected statistics for FORVIS, unless otherwise noted.

For your convenience, we have structured our proposal according to the requirements in your RFP. We believe our proposal will demonstrate our qualifications to serve the City.

INFORMATION CONTAINED IN FORVIS RFP RESPONSE, WHICH IT ASSERTS AS

CONFIDENTIAL, IS EITHER BUSINESS AND/OR PROPRIETARY TRADE SECRET

INFORMATION NOT SUBJECT TO DISCLOSURE AS SET FORTH IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA PUBLIC RECORDS ACT. SUCH CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION HAS

INDEPENDENT ECONOMIC VALUE TO FORVIS, IS NOT REASONABLY ASCERTAINABLE

BY THIRD PARTIES, AND IS THE SUBJECT OF REASONABLE EFFORTS BY FORVIS TO MAINTAIN ITS SECRECY AND/OR CONFIDENTIALITY. SUCH INFORMATION IN THIS PROPOSAL SHALL BE DESIGNATED WITH THE WORD CONFIDENTIAL. 712
FORVIS
FORVIS is a trademark of FORVIS, LLP, registered with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.

Citywide Forensic Accounting and Investigation Services / 3 V.B Proposal
A. Statement of Understanding and Approach
Implementation Plan
i. Method
Our forensic services are provided under the AICPAs Statement of Standards for Forensic Services. To ensure compliance, we have a standardized engagement review and approval system. Our forensic engagements are led by, and primarily staffed with, professionals holding their Certified Fraud Examiner and/or Certified in Financial Forensics credential. Our engagement leaders scope engagements based on functional areas to be analyzed and procedures responsive to common fraud schemes in the relevant areas. Given our history and success in implementing data analytics in our forensic services, data analytics will be utilized in the assessment phase to increase the effectiveness and efficiency of our procedures. Staff analysis is reviewed by an experienced forensic professional to ensure procedures are thoroughly and correctly implemented and to determine if additional procedures are necessary given the results of the analysis.

We will communicate with the City on a mutually agreed upon basis to keep relevant stakeholders informed of our findings. At the conclusion of our services, we will provide a written report with detailed exhibits to support our findings. All draft and final deliverables and reports are reviewed by the lead engagement executive on the project as well as a qualified and experienced forensic specialist not assigned to the project. This second reading is a quality control measure to determine that we have followed required standards and that our findings and recommendations are appropriately supported by our analysis, exhibits and documentation. Our reports and exhibits are routinely used in legal proceedings and would be the basis for any expert testimony we provide.

In addition, as part of our commitment to remaining at the forefront of the public sector, leaders across our national governmental practice meet regularly to discuss important developments, legislative updates, and challenges affecting governmental entities similar to the City. In addition, our public sector involvement has enabled us to establish connections with numerous regulatory and auditing organizations, including:

American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) Governmental Audit Quality Center, as a member
Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA)
Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB)
Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
U.S. Government Accountability Office
We look forward to communicating fraud awareness and identification practices and forward-looking strategies to help the City thoughtfully consider the areas important to fulfilling your fiduciary responsibilities.

Approach to Understanding Internal Controls
Our assessment will start with understanding your operations and the design of your controls. This helps create an effective and efficient assessment process. When performing the first phase of the assessment, our focus will be on understanding various operations, the related controls, and performing other discovery procedures to develop and focus the approach of subsequent phases. During the discovery phase, we intend to identify and use several data sources to inform us of historical trends, data points, and potential operational issues.
713
FORVIS
FORVIS is a trademark of FORVIS, LLP, registered with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.

Citywide Forensic Accounting and Investigation Services / 4 Our first objective is to identify those resources that might advance our understanding without extra effort on the Citys part. If you have documentation of your organizational structure, control environment (including technology), and the controls you have in place, along with any testing of those controls, we can often just read and supplement that information as needed. Even when clients have effective controls, their documentation is often limited, so additional effort may be required. When starting with limited documentation, we will:

Perform a risk assessment of the Treasury function using financial information and other key reports to identify the relevant areas for documenting our understanding and related testing; while we want to understand your operations, it isnt necessary for us to document every control, particularly when a control is not related to a significant assessment area Ask you to complete industry-specific questionnaires that summarize your control structure; you might complete these forms directly or we may interview you to guide the process, or some combination of both; this process includes understanding your information system and related controls Identify who performs or can perform control activities; we can use industry-based assignment of duties forms to capture those assignments
Assess and/or identify key controls you have in place for significant areas of risk; we will look for gaps in your design and potential overlapping assignments of duties that could or should be segregated Perform limited tests of design effectiveness of control activities; these tests will help us evaluate whether our documentation matches the activities occurring
Consider extended tests of controls; in some cases, your information may be so complex or voluminous that extended control testing is needed to rely on your control and reduce other substantive testing Summarize recommendations for your consideration; for minor deficiencies or suggestions, we may discuss changes during our assessment; for others, including significant deficiencies or material weaknesses, we will prepare written recommendations for your consideration
In periods following our this initial phase of our assessment, the majority of our understanding and documentation will be complete; going forward, we focus on changes that have occurred and continue performing tests of design effectiveness or expanded testing to evaluate whether control design has remained the same ii. Methodology
FORVIS forensic accounting project will be organized as follows:

1. Gathering background information and planning.

2. Identification and analysis of internal controls and related risks

3. Interviews

4. Forensic analysis, including data analytics and transaction testing

5. Reporting to the City and status updates
At the beginning of our engagement, and as part of the engagement planning process, we will meet with key City personnel to establish an engagement timeline. This timeline will identify the timing of status update meetings, as well as the timing for engagement deliverables (draft reports, final report, etc.).

Issues Management
FORVIS understands projects may encounter challenges as they progress, and we believe the key to resolving them is to identify potential issues as early as possible, so appropriate resources can be allocated. Our team will work with your senior management in resolving issues that could potentially affect the timeline of our analysis or budget. Note the City will be responsible for providing access to the information, data, and systems necessary to perform our analysis. In addition, the City 714
FORVIS
FORVIS is a trademark of FORVIS, LLP, registered with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.

Citywide Forensic Accounting and Investigation Services / 5 will designate an individual with the necessary authority to be our point of contact to assist with any access problems. In the event our access is hindered, we will stop work until the necessary access is provided.

Timeliness of Service & Quality of Deliverables
We are committed to providing our clients with high quality deliverables, as well as prompt responses to their requests, efficient resolution of issues and concerns, and on-time delivery based on agreed-upon completion schedules. We believe planning is key to performing work in an efficient and cost-effective manner. We perform effective project planning to help confirm our understanding of the scope, objectives of each task, and agreed-upon deliverables. We select staff with appropriate experience and training and prepare budgets to align with required tasks. The number of staff in the field at any time will be dependent on the procedures being performed. In addition, other than interviews which will be performed in-person, many of our forensic and analytical procedures can be performed remotely once the necessary data is provided. FORVIS will work with the City to coordinate on-site work to help reduce disruption to the Citys operations. iii. Project Management and Implementation Strategies
Our project management delivery methodology is aligned with key principles and processes from the Project Management Institute, Inc.s (PMI), Project Management Body of Knowledge® (PMBOK®) Guide and standards. This framework is based on the concept of accountability and effective collaboration and uses management tools and quality control processes, such as work breakdown structure (WBS) templates, checklists, and performance metrics. We believe following these principles enables FORVIS to standardize our methodology and the approach we will apply to lines of effort.

Client Satisfaction
It may sound simplistic, but we believe the best way to know how were doing is by simply asking our clients. We routinely seek input from our clients during our services through establishing a timeline of meetings to keep stakeholders apprised of our progress and findings, and to solicit feedback on our services and the manner in which we provide them. However, at FORVIS, client satisfaction expands well beyond individual engagement teams. Leaders of the firm routinely visit clients to monitor their satisfaction with our services, including managing partners, national industry partners and C-Suite executives. We also monitor client satisfaction by periodically issuing client satisfaction surveys, the results of which have generally been positive.
715
FORVIS
FORVIS is a trademark of FORVIS, LLP, registered with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.

Citywide Forensic Accounting and Investigation Services / 6 Unmatched Client Experience: Proven Results
Our firm is committed to delivering Unmatched Client Experiences through exceptional quality and client service. In 2023, FORVIS won ClearlyRateds Best of Accounting Award for Service Excellence. ClearlyRated utilizes a Net Promoter® Score (NPS®) to determine the results. NPS is a simple metric based on a survey question that asks your clients how likely they are to recommend your firm to a friend or colleague on a numeric scale of 0 - 10. Below, we have shared statistics regarding FORVIS NPS and comparable scores from other leading brands and our industry.

In addition, as evidenced by our recognition in the INSIDE Public Accounting 2023 IPA Best of the Best list, FORVIS offers value through a strong, reputable network of support and resources. Our national coverage benefits our clients, our people, and the market of the future as we focus on our commitment to deliver Unmatched Client Experiences.

Project Schedule
Based on the information included in the Request for Proposal, our preliminary proposed workplan includes the following:

1. Gathering Background Information & Planning (January 2024) a. Hold a kick-off call with City stakeholders for introductions, overview of FORVIS plan, and to further understand general concerns and goals of the project.
b. Obtain written policies or procedures that govern the management of the Citys Treasury functions, cash receipts and cash disbursements processes. In addition, obtain historical City audits, performance assessments, or other analysis that has been performed during the period from January 1, 2018, to June 30, 2023 (Scope Period).
c. Conduct interviews with identified City employees, as necessary, to develop an understanding of the Treasury function operations and accounting processes.
716
FORVIS
FORVIS is a trademark of FORVIS, LLP, registered with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.

Citywide Forensic Accounting and Investigation Services / 7

2. Analysis of Internal Controls (January and February 2024) d. Read the Citys written policies and procedures that govern the Treasury functions, cash receipts, and cash disbursement processes. Perform walkthroughs of cash receipt and cash disbursement transactions and document deviations in practice as compared to written policies and procedures. e. Document areas of cash receipt and/or cash disbursement internal control deficiencies. f. Assess the Treasury functions internal processes, systems, and financial controls to provide recommendations for modification to existing written procedures to reduce the risk of fiscal mismanagement.

FORVIS internal audit professionals will perform discovery and risk assessment walkthroughs and inquiries to understand the current state processes and maturity of controls within the receipting and disbursement cycles and to identify instances where opportunities for error, abuse or fraud may exist. Our procedures will be focused on the processes and controls for:

Vendor Masterfile (VMF) maintenance
Receipt of physical cash, checks and electronic deposits Recording of receipt and disbursement transactions
Chargebacks, rebills, reversals, corrections, and collections Reconciliations
Tracking and alerts of payment obligations and schedule Segregation of duties for key transaction types
Approval and authority limits
Our work will be performed in the following phases:

Phase I Discovery Phase: Gain a baseline understanding of current operations, data, processes, systems, and resources within the Treasury function with the objective of becoming well-informed so that an approach to Phase II can be scoped with targeted objectives, timeline, procedures, and an estimate for Phase II.

Phase II Analysis and Recommendations: Performance of the plan developed from Phase I. In this phase, our procedures will be focused on the assessment of current state processes and controls. Draft recommendations will be formulated and presented to management.

3. Data Gathering and Transaction Testing (February through April 2024) g. Obtain transactional level data from general ledger, bank, or other City accounts (such as investment accounts) for the Scope Period. In addition, obtain copies of the Citys vendor master and employee master files. Perform forensic data analytics on cash receipt and cash disbursement transactions (including tax receipts and distributions) which may include, but are not limited to, the following:
i. Compare federal and state government grant and/or reimbursement documentation to cash receipts and deposits reflected in the Citys bank accounts.
ii. Obtain and analyze bank reconciliations and investigate select unusual or aged reconciling items. iii. Analyze cash receipts by source over the Scope Period. Identify unusual patterns visually and through automated pattern recognition techniques and classify unusual activity. iv. Obtain and analyze cash receipt processing activity to identify transactions recorded before / after typical business hours, on weekends, on holidays, etc.
v. Compare vendor master file attributes to employee master file attributes to identify employees and vendors with matching attributes such as, but not limited to, addresses and phone numbers. 717
FORVIS
FORVIS is a trademark of FORVIS, LLP, registered with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.

Citywide Forensic Accounting and Investigation Services / 8 vi. Compare vendor master file attributes of different vendors to identify vendors with matching address, phone, names, etc.
vii. Identify vendors with no address, PO Box or rural route address only, or invalid addresses as compared to USPS database of valid addresses.
viii. Identify gaps in invoice and check numbering sequences. ix. Perform Digital Frequency Analysis (Benfords Law) on payable amounts to identify non-conforming digits to flag for further analysis.
x. Analyze payable amounts by vendor over specified period. Identify unusual patterns visually and through automated pattern recognition techniques and classify unusual activity by AP clerk or approver.
xi. Identify vendor master file changes by AP clerk. If date/time fields for changes are present, identify unusual dates or times of activity (weekends, holidays, after normal business hours). xii. Identify vendor payments occurring on same day each month for same amount. xiii. Analyze the budget to actual reports during the Scope Period, evaluating the reports for: appropriate levels of approval and line items which were unusually over/under budget. h. Based on the results of the data analytics, and management concerns, select a sample of financial transfers and:
i. Request and obtain, or gain access to, supporting documentation ii. Analyze supporting documentation
iii. Identify unusual payments, based on amount, payee, timing, supporting documentation i. Read the applicable City Minutes for the Scope Period, evaluating for the following: areas of potential conflicts of interest / related parties, areas of disagreement, or unusual items (approvals after the fact, etc.).

4. Reporting (April 2024)
j. Provide an oral report to City personnel of procedures performed, findings, and resulting recommendations k. Provide recommendations regarding additional procedures (if any) recommended by FORVIS l. Provide a final report to the City of procedures performed, findings, and resulting recommendations

5. Additional Procedures (TBD)
m. As requested, FORVIS personnel will provide additional forensic accounting and dispute consulting services.

FORVIS and the City will document these additional services in an addendum to our engagement letter and these services will be billed on an hourly basis.

City Staff Roles
In working with similar clients, we have developed efficient approaches that aim to avoid wasted effort. Your participation helps control costs, reduce unnecessary disruptions, and meet deadlines.

We need your team to maintain records in good condition, provide the necessary schedules, and cooperate with our audit team.

Most clients routinely prepare these records and schedules during their normal monthly or annual closing process.

Specific assistance from your personnel may include:

Attending planning meetings and preparing responses to questionnaires 718
FORVIS
FORVIS is a trademark of FORVIS, LLP, registered with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.

Citywide Forensic Accounting and Investigation Services / 9 Participating in coordination of on-site visits, interviews with key line personnel, and assistance in obtaining necessary documentation to support our workpapers
Responding to auditor inquiries during and subsequent to our fieldwork Providing training to our personnel on how to use your electronic document storage systems and other electronic media on which audit documentation may be stored
Pulling selected supporting documentation and other files, including reconciliations that are not imaged or maintained electronically
Helping to resolve any differences or exceptions noted
We will provide a list of the needed schedules well in advance of any deadlines, as well as spreadsheet templates for many of these schedules. We also will meet with your staff, as needed, to help them clearly understand what we need.

Innovative and Creative Approaches
MyFORVIS Innovative Client Portal Technology
Our innovative client portal, MyFORVIS, is designed to help address the challenges financial engagements present and conveniently connect you with FORVIS advisors. Prior to the start of your engagement, FORVIS will post our questionnaires and other related documents on our client portal website, specifically prepared for the City, where requests can be reviewed and completed.

This portal can make it easier to:

View and manage information about your engagement or project Securely share documents and files with your FORVIS advisors and project teams Organize documents and files for retrieval
Assign tasks to your team and receive requests for information from FORVIS Track the progress of tasks toward completion
Access our award-winning, industry-specific articles, webinars, videos, and more MyFORVIS can help improve communication, save time, limit disruptions, and keep you connected with FORVIS advisors.

A Forensic Accounting Approach with You in Mind
Our forensic accounting approach is more than just the technical services we provideits about how we provide them. Our goal is to work efficiently and effectively while limiting interruption to your teams other responsibilities.

Instead of spending time in areas that are of little value to the City, we want to focus on the issues and concerns that matter to youwhile also incorporating an appropriate level of analysis and testing that allows us to provide guidance to the City regarding potential internal control weaknesses and transactions with indications of potentially fraudulent activity. That means tailoring our testing and procedures based on your unique operations and internal processes, as well as involving the City in our approach from the planning stages onward.

Tailoring an internal control and forensic accounting approach also includes confirming we have the right team in place to serve you and working with you on the logistics of our process. While we find value in being on-site to perform significant elements of our analysis, we will work with you to consider the timing and the balance of what work is best done remotely and what value we can add by being face-to-face.
719
FORVIS
FORVIS is a trademark of FORVIS, LLP, registered with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.

Citywide Forensic Accounting and Investigation Services / 10 Innovative Firm Strategies and Resources
FORVIS proudly encourages and promotes diversity and an inclusive workplace. With innovative strategies for recruiting, as well as an ongoing focus on the development and implementation of internal inclusion programs, we are committed to identifying opportunities that help each individual to thrive.

With the urgency of changing environmental, social, and governance (ESG) requirements and the expectation your organization is prepared for what comes next, our experienced advisors are ready to offer the insights and education you may need to enhance and inform your ESG strategy. Start with our ESG and climate risk FORsightsTM at forvis.com/forsights.

City-Owned Facilities
FORVIS does not plan to lease, purchase, or rent any City-owned facilities or properties in connection with this engagement.

B. Company Information
Contact Person and Firm Information
Your proposed engagement executive, Rand Gambrell, will serve as the primary contact person for the City. His contact information is provided below:

Rand Gambrell, CPA, ABV, CFE, CFF
Managing Director
Phone: 303.837.3594
Email: [email protected]
Office Locations
As a modern, forward-thinking firm, we have a virtual headquarters with professionals serving in offices throughout the country to better serve our national client base. Our Denver, Colorado, address can be used for correspondence.

FORVIS
1801 California Street | Suite 2900
Denver, CO 80202
FORVIS Office Locations
United States
Alabama
Birmingham
Arizona
Phoenix
Arkansas
Fort Smith
Little Rock
Rogers
California
Irvine
Colorado
Colorado Springs
Denver
Florida
Boca Raton
Jacksonville
Tampa Bay
Georgia
Atlanta
Illinois
Chicago
Decatur
Oakbrook Terrace
Indiana
720
FORVIS
FORVIS is a trademark of FORVIS, LLP, registered with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.

Citywide Forensic Accounting and Investigation Services / 1 Bloomington
Evansville
Fort Wayne
Indianapolis
Iowa
Des Moines
Kansas
Wichita
Kentucky
Bowling Green
Louisville
Mississippi
Jackson
Missouri
Branson
Joplin
Kansas City
Springfield
St. Louis
Nebraska
Lincoln
Omaha
New York
New York City East
New York City West
North Carolina
Asheville
Charlotte SouthPark
Charlotte Uptown
Greenville
Hendersonville
High Point
Pinehurst
Raleigh
Winston-Salem
Ohio
Cincinnati
Toledo
Oklahoma
Enid
Oklahoma City
Tulsa
Pennsylvania
Erie
Pittsburgh
South Carolina
Charleston
Greenville
Summerville
Tennessee
Knoxville
Memphis
Nashville
Texas
Austin
Dallas North
Fort Worth North
Fort Worth South
Houston
San Antonio
Waco
Utah
Salt Lake City
Virginia
Norfolk
Richmond
Washington, DC Metro Area
Tysons, VA
West Virginia
Charleston
Wisconsin
Appleton
Madison
Canada
Toronto*
United Kingdom
London*
*Subsidiaries and affiliates supporting
FORVIS
721
FORVIS
FORVIS is a trademark of FORVIS, LLP, registered with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.

Citywide Forensic Accounting and Investigation Services / 12 Firm Organization
FORVIS is a registered limited liability partnership under Delaware law. As such, more than 500 partners and principals throughout FORVIS offices have an ownership interest in FORVIS. Regional managing partners oversee the operations of each of FORVIS six regions, and local managing partners oversee the operations of each of FORVIS offices.

FORVIS Governing Board is the policy-making body of the firm, made up of the board chair, chief executive officer, three regional managing partners, and eight partners who serve three-year terms. Other firm leaders include:

Chief Executive Officer Tom Watson
Governing Board Chair Matt Snow
Chief Growth Officer Tim York
Chief Operating Officer Abe Cole
Chief Practice & Innovation Officer Rob Pruitt
Chief Talent Officer Lori Hayley
Chief Performance Officer Mike Crawford
Chief Integration Officer John Roberts
Chief Risk Officer Mike Wolfe
Chief Legal Officer Jennifer Hannah
Chief Quality Officer Will Neeriemer
National Director of Accounting & Assurance Professional Standards Group Partner Bryan Bodnar National Tax Partner Jesse Palmer
722
FORVIS
FORVIS is a trademark of FORVIS, LLP, registered with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.

Citywide Forensic Accounting and Investigation Services / 13 National Consulting Partner Angela Miratsky
National SEC/PCAOB Partner Jeff Rapaglia
Below is a list of our subsidiaries and professional affiliations.

FORVIS Capital Advisors, LLC
FORVIS Cayman, Ltd.

FORVIS Global Advisory Canada ULC
FORVIS Global Advisory Ltd. UK
FORVIS Wealth Advisors, LLC

TALENT SHIFTTM, LLC
Professional Affiliations As a member of the American Institute of CPAs (AICPA), FORVIS also is a member of its PCPS (Private Companies Practice Section) Firm Practice Center, and its three quality centers: Center for Audit Quality, Governmental Audit Quality Center, and Employee Benefit Plan Audit Quality Center. FORVIS also is registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB), which is required to serve as an independent auditor of public companies. FORVIS also is one of the largest U.S. members of Praxity, AISBL*, a global alliance of independent firms. *Praxity, AISBL, is a global alliance of independent firms. Organised as an international not-for-profit entity under Belgium law, Praxity has its executive office in Epsom.

Praxity Global Alliance Limited is a not-for-profit company registered in England and Wales, limited by guarantee, and has its registered office in England. As an Alliance, Praxity does not practice the profession of public accountancy or provide audit, tax, consulting, or other professional services of any type to third parties. The Alliance does not constitute a joint venture, partnership, or network between participating firms. Because the Alliance firms are independent, Praxity does not guarantee the services, or the quality of services, provided by participating firms.

Statement of Independence
To the best of our knowledge, FORVIS is independent with respect to the City as defined by:

The Code of Professional Conduct of the American Institute of CPAs (AICPA) U.S. Government Accountability Offices Government Auditing Standards Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB)
SEC
U.S. Department of Labor (DOL)
National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC)
We are not aware of any relationship that would impair our independence.

Process to Monitor and Maintain Independence
We work hard to maintain high standards of professional practice, including a strong system of quality control that emphasizes independence and objectivity.

To ascertain whether the firms policies relating to independence, integrity, and objectivity are followed, all of our employees are required to complete an annual independence survey. This electronic survey verifies the firms policies have been read and the individual is in compliance. Explanations of special circumstances, documentation of questions, and listings of any potential conflicts of interest are requested in the survey. A reporting mechanism has been adopted to ensure the independence and objectivity standards are met.

Furthermore, FORVIS maintains a restricted entity list of clients that are public companies and certain other clients who issue securities that could be purchased by FORVIS personnel. All firm personnel are required to review this list prior to acquiring any security, obtaining a loan, opening, or modifying a brokerage account, or entering a business relationship. 723
FORVIS
FORVIS is a trademark of FORVIS, LLP, registered with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.

Citywide Forensic Accounting and Investigation Services / 14 FORVIS also monitors compliance with independence requirements by annually selecting a sample of employees and partners to provide brokerage statements and tax returns for themselves and all immediate family members to verify whether information submitted on the annual survey is complete and accurate.

Litigation, Mediation, and Arbitration
There have been no disciplinary actions taken against FORVIS by the AICPA or any regulatory or licensing agency in the past five years. To avoid litigation, FORVIS maintains an extensive risk management program addressing a multitude of issues ranging from client acceptance to final working paper and financial statement review. Yet, as with any firm our size, the firm may experience litigation from time to time. Details of litigation cannot be disclosed pursuant to confidentiality agreements; however, the results of litigation have never been material to the firm. Currently, there is no substantial litigation outstanding.

C. Company Personnel
We take team selection seriously and have the appropriate team of advisors to meet your needs. Previous experience is a primary determinant for assigning professionals to your engagement, and we have assigned individuals who are experienced in working with forensic accounting to your engagement.

Resumes of Key Personnel
Rand Gambrell, CPA, ABV, CFE, CFF
Managing Director
303.837.3594
[email protected]
Engagement Responsibilities
As the lead and forensic engagement executive, Rand will be responsible for coordinating and overseeing the engagement. He also will serve as the point of contact for the City.

Experience
As a member of FORVIS Forensics & Valuation Services division, Rand provides business valuation services, forensic accounting, economic damage analysis, fraud auditing and bankruptcy and restructuring services, including serving as an expert witness. His more than 25 years of experience and 19 years with the firm includes performing audits and consulting services for large national and international companies while with an international accounting firm.

Rand has extensive forensic accounting experience, serving as an engagement executive to help develop internal control and forensic accounting workplans, coordinating data analytic and transaction testing procedures, supervising staff, monitoring engagement progress and deliverables, and helping ensure project quality control standards are met. Rands forensic accounting clients include private companies, state and local governmental entities, and not-forprofit organizations.

He is a member of the American Institute of CPAs, Colorado Society of CPAs, and Association of Certified Fraud Examiners. He is a Certified Fraud Examiner (CFE) who is Accredited in Business Valuation (ABV) and Certified in Financial Forensics (CFF).

Rand is a 1991 graduate of University of Colorado, Boulder, and a 1995 graduate of University of Denver, Colorado, with an MBA degree with an accounting emphasis. 724
FORVIS
FORVIS is a trademark of FORVIS, LLP, registered with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.

Citywide Forensic Accounting and Investigation Services / 15 Christie Clements, CISA®, CRMA®
Managing Director
317.383.4037
[email protected]
Engagement Responsibilities
Internal Audit Engagement Executive
Experience
Christie is a risk advisory practice leader within the Indianapolis office. She serves as an industry leader for FORVIS not-for-profit and public sector practices and is responsible for engagement oversight and managing a team of advisors who deliver a variety of services across several industries.

She has 25 years of internal audit and risk management experience. Christie is experienced working in dispersed and complex environments, often employing a data mining and analytics methodology in her internal audit and process improvement engagements. She has worked with organizations to transform operations to provide greater stakeholder value to increase the efficiency and effectiveness of controls, services, and processes.

Her internal control projects have encompassed all areas of finance, operations, and IT, including revenue and expenditure cycles, call centers, vendor management, contract compliance and systems development life cycles.

Christie holds Certified Information Systems Auditor (CISA) and Certified Risk Management Assurance (CRMA) designations. She is a member of ISACA® and The Institute of Internal Auditors (The IIA) and formerly served on the board of governors for The IIA Indianapolis Chapter.

She is a graduate of Kelley School of Business, Indiana University, Indianapolis, with a B.S. degree in accounting.
725
FORVIS
FORVIS is a trademark of FORVIS, LLP, registered with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.

Citywide Forensic Accounting and Investigation Services / 16 Tom Haldiman, CPA, CFE, ACDA
Managing Director
816.221.6300
[email protected]
Engagement Responsibilities
Data Analytics Engagement Executive
Experience
Tom is a member of FORVIS Risk Advisory 2 practice, where he focuses on process automation and product development. His passion lies in the development of innovative solutions by leveraging technology. His experience includes managing large data analytics projects, creating new solutions to automate processes, and developing new industry-specific products. His public accounting background also includes forensic investigations, litigation support, business valuation, and financial statement audits.

He joined FORVIS Forensics & Valuation services division in early 2008 at our legacy company BKD, LLP. Since then, he has provided consulting services to clients in a wide range of industries, including health care, manufacturing, financial institutions, and education. He has experience with embezzlement investigations, including a $1.2 million embezzlement, and litigation support projects involving disputes totaling billions of dollars. Tom has unique experience with ticketing operations and has worked with university and professional sports teams, as well as theater and concert venues, to identify and quantify inappropriate ticket activity and abuse.

Tom joined legacy company BKDs Analytics team in 2016. He has experience using Alteryx, SQL, ACL, IDEA, Tableau, and Excel software for analysis, data visualization, and process automation. He has customized, implemented, and helped clients to leverage these tools within their organization.

He is a member of the American Institute of CPAs, the Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (ACFE), and the Kansas City ACL Users Group. He has attained the Alteryx Designer Core certification and the ACL Certified Data Analyst (ACDA) certification, which denotes expertise in performing data analytics with Alteryx and ACL Analytics software, respectively. He also has received the Certified Fraud Examiner (CFE) designation from ACFE. The CFE credential denotes proven expertise in fraud prevention, detection, and deterrence.

Tom is a 2006 summa cum laude graduate of Missouri State University, Springfield, with a B.S. degree in accounting, and a 2007 graduate with an M.Acc. degree. 726
FORVIS
FORVIS is a trademark of FORVIS, LLP, registered with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.

Citywide Forensic Accounting and Investigation Services / 17 Annie Laudick Cortez, CFE, ACDA
Managing Consultant
317.383.4002
[email protected]
Engagement Responsibilities
Data Analytics Engagement Lead
Experience
Annie is a member of the Analytics team, focusing on product development and automation.

Annies experience includes developing new products and helping to streamline and automate existing products. She performs analytics to help identify fraud, waste, and abuse in payment data that can help highlight opportunities for internal control improvements. Annie has worked in a variety of industries including higher education, public sector, and commercial products. As part of this work, she regularly works with the Internal Audit service line to help bring a data-driven approach to internal audits. In addition, Annie frequently works alongside the Forensics & Valuation service line, assisting with data-heavy fraud investigations and fraud prevention projects.

She is a member of the Association of Certified Fraud Examiners and has received the Certified Fraud Examiner (CFE) designation. In addition, she holds an Alteryx Designer certification and is an ACL Certified Data Analyst (ACDA), which denotes expertise in performing data analytics with Alteryx and ACL Analytics software. Annie also has experience using SQL, Tableau, and Excel for data analysis, data visualization, and automation.

Prior to joining FORVIS, Annie served as an SAP consultant at an international accounting firm. In this role she focused on SAP security and the analytics needed to understand clients environments. She can draw upon these analytics skills to better understand FORVIS client data and provide high-impact insights.

She is a summa cum laude graduate of Marquette University, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, with a B.S. degree in business administration with a major in information technology. 727
FORVIS
FORVIS is a trademark of FORVIS, LLP, registered with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.

Citywide Forensic Accounting and Investigation Services / 18 Kendra A. Roberts, CPA, CFE
Managing Consultant
615.928.5226
[email protected]
Engagement Role
Internal Audit Engagement In-Charge
Experience
Kendra brings 15 years of audit experience to the Enterprise Risk Solutions Practice. Prior to joining FORVIS, Kendra spent eight years in the healthcare industry. She has experience working hospitals and physician practices on SOX implementations, internal control best practices, internal audit engagements, and internal audit software implementations and enhancements.

Prior to that, she served six years as a legislative auditor for the Tennessee Comptroller of the Treasury. There she worked on various financial, compliance, performance, and sunset audits across several state divisions.

Kendra has performed internal control assessments, compliance, operational, and performance audits in various industries such as: Cities/Municipalities, Non-for-Profit, Manufacturing, etc.

Kendra has planned, conducted, and provided appropriate findings and recommendations in accordance with Generally Accepted Government Auditing Standards (GAGAS) or Generally Accepted Auditing Standards (GAAS).

Ms. Roberts has planned, managed, and executed a variety of advisory and audit engagements focused around operational, financial statement and compliance risks. She is well experienced in developing flowcharts, process walkthroughs and control mappings for various processes and systems.

Kendra holds Certified Fraud Examiner (CFE) and CPA certifications. She is a member of the American Institute of CPAs and the Middle Tennessee Chapter of the Association of Certified Fraud Examiners.

She is a graduate of Freed-Hardeman University, Henderson, Tennessee, with a B.B.A. degree in public accounting.
728
FORVIS
FORVIS is a trademark of FORVIS, LLP, registered with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.

Citywide Forensic Accounting and Investigation Services / 19 Licenses of Key Personnel
FORVIS is properly licensed to practice public accounting in the state of California. All key professionals who would be assigned to your engagement are properly registered/licensed to practice in the state of California or able to practice in the state due to mobility laws, without the requirement to obtain an individual California license.

FORVIS is licensed to practice in the following states:

Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
District of Columbia
Florida
Georgia
Guam
Hawaii*
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine*
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana*
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York*
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Puerto Rico
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virgin Islands*
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
*Name change application pending.

D. Disclosures
FORVIS proposed engagement team has no past or current business or personal relationship with any Banning official as described in the RFP.

E. Experience and References
Minimum Experience Requirements
Forensic Accounting Experience
FORVIS Forensics & Valuation Services (FVS) practice is a multidisciplinary team of professionals including forensic accountants, forensic technologists, and business valuation professionals. Our forensics professionals excel in helping resolve disputes through fraud investigations, litigation support services, data analytics, and digital forensics. We serve clients ranging from private equity-backed and other closely held businesses to Fortune 100 corporations, as well as nonprofits and federal, state, and local governmental agencies.

In FY23, our FVS practice provided services to roughly 1,400 clients nationwide. Team members have masters degrees and hold multiple certifications, including Certified Public Accountant (CPA), Certified in Financial Forensics (CFF), Certified Fraud Examiner (CFE), and more. Our professionals diverse backgrounds provide the City with resources should an unanticipated question or issue arise.
729
FORVIS
FORVIS is a trademark of FORVIS, LLP, registered with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.

Citywide Forensic Accounting and Investigation Services / 20 Litigation Support
Working with legal counsel to develop a cost-effective and productive team is the key to FORVIS success in complex litigation.

Our FVS division brings a professional forensics perspective to the prosecution or defense of a case. We have many years of experience helping attorneys in many complex litigation cases and provide a broad range of litigation support services including:

Our leaders have experience testifying as expert witnesses in state and federal courts, as well as before arbitration panels and other alternative dispute resolution forums. They have been qualified as experts in personal injury damages, forensic accounting, business valuation, and other areas. Forensics & Valuation Service Offerings:

Bankruptcy related litigation
Business valuation disputes
Class actions
Commercial litigation
Construction disputes
Damages
Data analytics
Digital forensics
Divorce/domestic matters
Forensic accounting
Insurance claims
Investigations
Partnership/shareholder disputes
Personal economic damages
Purchase price disputes
Tax controversy matters
Analytics Services
FORVIS offers a suite of data mining, data visualization, and data analytics services. These services are customized to each clients industry, specific risks, challenges, and areas of focus. Our analytics team operates a cloud-based data analytics platform allowing us to import and store large datasets, build, and execute advanced data analytic workflows including machine learning models and advanced data visualization capabilities for interacting with data in an intuitive and insightful fashion.

We can help you detect fraud using sophisticated technology and proprietary techniques developed by data mining specialists and Certified Fraud Examiners. Our experience includes analyzing large data sets for states, municipalities, Fortune 500 companies, and clients in many industries.

In a forensic engagement such as yours, we have found that we can use our robust, data analytics tools to analyze 100 percent of a data set, rather than using traditional sampling. We use advanced tools such as Alteryx with advanced workflow and automation capabilities to run our procedures on entire datasets. We have analyzed files containing millions of records and narrowed down the list to those with attributes indicating there could be a potential problem. We will work proactively with the City to identify which methodology to use across the various procedures. The objective is to obtain reasonable confidence the test objectives have been met and to be as comprehensive as possible in our analysis.

Past Experience
For much of our history, forensic accounting and internal control consulting have been a part of services we have provided to clients. FORVIS formalized the delivery of forensic accounting services under the FVS division on January 1, 2006. We have a track record of helping similar public sector entities and understand our clients are our best ambassadors. Listening to us helps, but hearing directly from your peers can be a meaningful step in your decision-making process. We encourage you to reach out to the following clients to discuss FORVIS services and capabilities at your convenience.

Representative Public Sector Clients
Adams County, Colorado
Choctaw Nation Housing Authority
Hoosier Lottery
Illinois Gaming Board
Missouri Department of
Transportation
Testifying &
Consulting Expert Services
Neutral Services Data Analytics
730
FORVIS
FORVIS is a trademark of FORVIS, LLP, registered with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.

Citywide Forensic Accounting and Investigation Services / 21 Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma
City Utilities of Springfield
Colorado Water Resources
Development & Power Authority
Denver Urban Renewal Authority
Fayetteville Public Library
Hinds County Board of
Supervisors
HoosierFund
Indiana Education Savings
Authority and Upromise
Investments, Inc.

Kansas City Board of Public
Utilities, Kansas
Minneapolis/St. Paul Metropolitan
Airports Commission
Mississippi Department of
Corrections
Municipal Energy Agency of
Mississippi
Nebraska Lottery
Pikes Peak Library District
State Universities Retirement
System of Illinois
Teachers Retirement System of
the State of Illinois
Success Stories
Illinois Department of Children and Family Services
FORVIS was engaged with the State of Illinois to provide forensic services focused on identifying potentially improper payments based on rates and types of services contained in the actual contract/grant agreement for the services and actual payments made to vendors. FORVIS services included assisting the state with:

Determining/ensuring compliance with signed contracts and federal and state rules and regulations Evaluating expenditure/purchasing decisions
Evaluating the appropriateness of the expenditure/purchases and the beneficiaries of income, goods, and services Evaluating the appropriateness of supporting documentation such as, but not limited to, invoices, timesheets, approved cost allocation plans, etc.

The goal of the engagement was to protect state resources by assessing whether taxpayer funds were used in accordance with state and federal statutes.

Data Analytics Identifies Unusual Use of Purchasing Cards A large city was concerned about the internal controls surrounding purchasing cards. Using data analytics, we were able to test these controls and identify other unusual transactions. This testing identified numerous instances of split purchases, where employees visited stores multiple times on a given day to circumvent transaction limits. Further, the testing identified transactions with prohibited vendor types and unusual purchases based on keyword searches. We also interviewed managers and employees in several departments to help improve cash handling procedures.

Uncovering an Embezzlement Scheme of More than $1 Million A city discovered a potential embezzlement scheme and turned to us to help assess the allegations. FORVIS quickly met with the city and began work immediately after the initial discovery. Our investigation included a significant amount of electronic data analysis, which helped uncover an embezzlement scheme exceeding $1 million. In addition, the city asked us to assess cash handling procedures in other city departments. We identified weaknesses in departmental cash handling processes including finance, buildings and permits, landfill, municipal court, and other areas. Our report was provided to management, which was used to begin making changes to help reduce the risk of fraud.

Misuse of Bond Proceeds in City Government
A city requested our forensic accounting services to address allegations related to their bond issues. Comments surfaced alleging the city had used restricted bond proceeds to meet payroll obligations when it was experiencing shortfalls in its general operating fund revenues. We traced the bond proceeds through the citys bank accounts, quantifying the funds that were not used for their designated purpose. Our report became a public document and was posted in various online media outlets. We 731
FORVIS
FORVIS is a trademark of FORVIS, LLP, registered with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.

Citywide Forensic Accounting and Investigation Services / 22 also supported the citys new management team and the citys legal counsel on various issues after our report was released.

During the process, we met the citys completion deadlines and fee expectations.

Data Analytics Help a City Identify Internal Controls Problems A large midwestern city wanted to improve their internal control processes by leveraging data analytics. We implemented a Payment Risk Analytics solution for them designed to identify unusual patterns within accounts payable and purchasing card payments, relationships between employees and vendors, and other patterns consistent with fictitious vendors, waste, and abuse. Some example procedures included:

Searching for duplicate vendors, based on name, address, phone number, Tax ID, and bank account information.

Identifying employees located within 500 feet of a vendor Search for duplicate payments
Trending payments over time to identify acceleration patterns Client References
We have a track record of helping similar local government agencies and understand our clients are our best ambassadors.

Listening to us helps, but hearing directly from your peers can be a meaningful step in your decision-making process. We encourage you to reach out to the following clients to discuss FORVIS services and capabilities at your convenience.

Adams County, Colorado
4430 South Adams County Parkway, Suite C4000A
Brighton, CO 80601
Ms. Nancy Duncan
Budget & Finance Director
720.523.6276
[email protected]
Service Description: Internal audit outsource, data
analytics and forensic accounting services
Dates: 2021 Present
Sedgwick County
100 N. Broadway, Suite 610
Wichita, KS 67202
Ms. Lindsay Poe Rousseau
Chief Financial Officer
316.660.7141
[email protected]
Service Description: Financial fraud investigations,
including a review of county-wide Treasury functions; data analytics; employee theft; personnel conflict of interest investigations; and policy and procedures review and
remediation.

Dates: 2017 Present
City of Springfield, Missouri
840 Boonville Avenue
Springfield, MO 65802
Mr. David Holtmann
Finance Director
417.864.1632
[email protected]
Service Description: Outsourced internal audit and payment risk analytics
Dates: 2019 2020

CONFIDENTIAL
732
FORVIS
FORVIS is a trademark of FORVIS, LLP, registered with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.

Citywide Forensic Accounting and Investigation Services / 24 Appendix
733
FORVIS
FORVIS is a trademark of FORVIS, LLP, registered with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.

Citywide Forensic Accounting and Investigation Services / 25 Exceptions to Terms and Conditions
In conformity with the City's RFP, FORVIS understands the City will negotiate the terms of the scope of services and compensation with the selected respondent. To this end, we are required upon acceptance of the engagement to communicate the actual scope and terms of the engagement in a separate letter to be signed by the City and FORVIS. The engagement letter, prepared in accordance with professional standards, is intended to become a part of the contract between the City and FORVIS.

In addition, FORVIS recognizes the RFP sample contract terms and conditions must be accepted in full to be considered responsive. FORVIS intends to be responsive except a few changes will be needed to comply with professional standards and/or FORVIS policies. As FORVIS has successfully resolved similar issues with municipalities, FORVIS is confident the parties can successfully negotiate mutually acceptable terms and conditions. FORVIS sincerely appreciates the City's consideration and understanding. FORVIS looks forward to working with the City on this engagement. 734
FORVIS
FORVIS is a trademark of FORVIS, LLP, registered with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.

Citywide Forensic Accounting and Investigation Services / 26 AICPA Peer Review Letter
735
FORVIS
FORVIS is a trademark of FORVIS, LLP, registered with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.

Citywide Forensic Accounting and Investigation Services / 27 BKD Peer Review Report
736
FORVIS
FORVIS is a trademark of FORVIS, LLP, registered with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.

Citywide Forensic Accounting and Investigation Services / 28 About FORVIS
737
738
Citywide Forensic Accounting and Investigation Services Submitted by FORVIS, LLP
A proposal for:

ORIGINAL
RFP-23-040
739
FORVIS
FORVIS is a trademark of FORVIS, LLP, registered with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.

Citywide Forensic Accounting and Investigation Services / 23 V.C Price Proposal
Proposed Fees
Our goal is to be candid, timely, answer your questions about fees upfront, and avoid fee surprises. We determine our fees by evaluating a number of variables: the complexity of the work, the projects scope, the time we will spend, and the level of professional staff needed. In addition to our quoted fee, you will be billed travel costs and an administrative fee of 5%. This fee covers items such as copies, postage and other delivery charges, supplies, technology-related costs, such as computer processing, software licensing, research and library databases, and similar expense items.

Our fees may increase if our duties or responsibilities change because of new rules, regulations, and accounting or auditing standards. We will consult with you should this happen.

These fees do not include any time for additional out-of-scope services which may be requested by the City. Any such work will be billed based on our hourly rates.

Phase I Investigation - for the Scope Period from January 2018 through June 2023

1. Gathering Background Information & Planning $17,000

2. Analysis of Internal Controls $40,000

3. Data Gathering & Transaction Testing $165,000

4. Reporting $36,000
Travel $10,000
TOTAL $268,000
The Phase I investigation fees identified above are based on our understanding of the project scope included the Request for Proposal Citywide Forensic Accounting and Investigation Services (RFP-23-040) and assume approximately 640 hours will be required to provide the Phase I procedures and related reporting. If the Phase I scope of procedures are amended or revised, resulting in an expansion of the hours required to perform the procedures, FORVIS reserves the right to modify the proposed fees presented.

Hourly Rates
Any work outside the proposed scope will be billed according to our hourly rates.

Staff Level Hourly Rates
Partner / Principal / Managing Director / Director $530$710 Senior Manager $440$540
Manager $330$415
Senior Associate / Senior Consultant $290$330
Associate / Consultant $215$255
Our professional hourly rates may increase during a calendar year. We reserve the right to submit to the City an hourly rate adjustment request thirty (30) days prior to the effective date of the increase. 740
741
NOVEMBER 28, 2023

A PROPOSAL TO PROVIDE
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR:

City of Banning, CA
742
2 BDO | A Proposal to Provide Professional Services for City of Banning, CA BDO USA, P.C., a Virginia professional corporation, is the U.S. member of BDO International Limited, a UK company limited by guarantee, and forms part of the international BDO network of independent member firms. BDO is the brand name for the BDO network and for each of the BDO Member Firms.

November 28, 2023
Barbara Mason
Purchasing Manager
City of Banning
99 E. Ramsey St.

Banning, CA 92220
Dear Ms. Mason:

We thank you for the opportunity to present our qualifications for forensic accounting investigation services to the City of Banning (“the City”).

BDO has a unique culture rooted in similar core values as the City and ensures not only a continuous focus on our clients and professionals, but also a long-term commitment to quality service. All of our clients experience our highquality service approach characterized through direct access to top technical resources, and a streamlined project management structure delivered to drive the best possible value on every engagement.

Our professionals have extensive experience serving organizations like the City and have a proven track record of serving state and local government organizations. We apply a systematic and disciplined approach to ensure that any allegations or suspicions of fraud are, not only thoroughly investigated, but are traced to the root-cause so that potential weak points can be strengthened to mitigate future fraud risks.

The following proposal describing our capabilities outlines our understanding of the scope of services, our staff qualifications and past experience, and BDO’s time-tested approach to conducting investigations. BDO believes it can provide the City with services that are the best value for the money through cost efficient and streamlined project management structures, which pull in subject matter expertise when necessary while also eliminating unnecessary overhead to drive value for our clients. BDO also has on-demand access to thousands of resources across the country and can utilize them to further drive cost efficiencies.

BDO is willing to enter into a contract with the City. Please see our contract considerations in Appendix A on page thirty-three the proposal document.

Throughout the RFP review process, on behalf of BDO the contact person is Sly Atayee, who can be reached by email at [email protected] or by phone at 703-336-1689.

We will furnish any additional information upon request. Again, we thank you for this opportunity and we look forward to further demonstrating our capabilities and distinctly different service approach. Please do not hesitate to call if you would like to discuss our service model or if we can provide you with any additional information.

Sincerely,
Andrea Espinola Wilson
Managing Partner
Industry Specialty Services
Direct: 703-963-4275
Email: [email protected]
743
At BDO, our purpose is helping people thrive, every day. Together, we are focused on delivering exceptional and sustainable outcomes — for our people, our clients and our communities. Across the U.S., and in over 160 countries through our global organization, BDO professionals provide assurance, tax and advisory services for a diverse range of clients.

BDO is the brand name for the BDO network and for each of the BDO Member Firms. BDO USA, P.C., a Virginia professional corporation, is the U.S. member of BDO International Limited, a UK company limited by guarantee, and forms part of the international BDO network of independent member firms: www.bdo.com Material discussed in this publication is meant to provide general information and should not be acted on without professional advice tailored to your needs. © 2023 BDO USA, P.C. All rights reserved. 744
NOVEMBER 28, 2023

A PROPOSAL TO PROVIDE
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR:

City of Banning, CA
745
2 BDO | A Proposal to Provide Professional Services for City of Banning, CA Table of Contents
V.B.A Statement of Understanding and Approach 3
V.B.B Company Information 13
V.B.C Company Personnel 18
V.B.D Disclosure 25
V.B.E Evidence and References 27
Appendix 34
746
3 BDO | A Proposal to Provide Professional Services for City of Banning, CA V.B.A Statement of Understanding and Approach
747
4 BDO | A Proposal to Provide Professional Services for City of Banning, CA  An implementation plan that describes in detail (i) the methods, including controls by which your firm or entity manages projects of the type sought by this RFP; (ii) methodology for soliciting and documenting views of internal and external stakeholders; (iii) and any other project management or implementation strategies or techniques that the respondent intends to employ in carrying out the work.  Detailed description of efforts your firm or entity will undertake to achieve client satisfaction and to satisfy the requirements of the "Scope of Work" section.

Our Understanding
The City of Banning ("the City" or "City") is seeking comprehensive forensic accounting and investigation services, focusing on the City's Treasury functions, including reviewing financial activities from January 1, 2018, to June 30, 2023. The initial Phase 1 involves performing an initial assessment to determine if a more extensive investigation is warranted, and preliminary reporting to the City. This phase is critical to assess the scope and depth of any potential financial anomalies, and it will lay the groundwork for any subsequent detailed forensic analysis to be performed in Phase 2.

In Phase 2, our task would be to perform forensic analysis to identify, investigate, and quantify any irregular financial anomalies, assess the design of the current system of internal controls, recommend control improvements, and provide final reporting to the City.

BDO understands that although there have not been any instances of known fraud, it is important to the City and its residents that a thorough review is completed to provide confidence that precious resources are being utilized appropriately. It is also important to the City that the current system of internal controls be assessed to identify and mitigate potential risk areas that could result in future vulnerabilities.

The project may evolve based on initial findings, with potential additional services needed, such as expert witness support. Additionally, this entails a thorough examination of all relevant documents and transactions, and liaising with various departments to gain a comprehensive understanding of the City's financial processes and controls. 748
5 BDO | A Proposal to Provide Professional Services for City of Banning, CA PDF Mining & Extraction
 CaseWare IDEA
 Able2Extract
 DataSnipper
Data Collection, Preparation & Analytics
 Microsoft SQL Server & AWS GovCloud
 Trifacta Data Wrangler
 BDO Proprietary Python, Ruby, SQL and VBA
Scripts
Tools & Technology for Investigations
BDO also utilizes an array of third-party and internally developed proprietary tools to automate tasks whenever possible so we can more efficiently and expediently support forensic investigations; these tools include, but are not limited to:

BI Visualizations
 PowerBI
 Qlik Sense
Cloud
 Tableau
Summary Investigation Technical Approach
BDO utilizes a standard, engagement-tested approach for conducting forensic accounting and investigations. This ensures uniformity across our work, provides a comprehensive methodology to uncover the facts, and allows us to prepare meaningful reports for our clients. Our approach also provides the City with a roadmap to move past any identified misconduct and implement the proper mitigating control procedures. Our goal is to give the City confidence that its assets are being used to support its purpose and objectives, and not for unauthorized purposes.  An implementation plan that describes in detail (i) the methods, including controls by which your firm or entity manages projects of the type sought by this RFP; (ii) methodology for soliciting and documenting views of internal and external stakeholders; (iii) and any other project management or implementation strategies or techniques that the respondent intends to employ in carrying out the work.  Detailed description of efforts your firm or entity will undertake to achieve client satisfaction and to satisfy the requirements of the "Scope of Work" section.

BDO GOAL: ALLOWING YOU TO REFOCUS

ON YOUR PURPPOSE/OBJECTIVES
PHASE 1 PHASE 2

1. Information
Gathering
and Analysis of
Existing Controls
and Gaps

2. Pre-Analytic
Procedures

3. Investigation
Interviews/
Site Visits

4. Preliminary
Reporting

5. Forensic
Examination

6. Evaluating
Controls and
Developing
Recommendations

7. Final
Reporting
749
6 BDO | A Proposal to Provide Professional Services for City of Banning, CA Detailed Investigation Technical Approach
BDO’s forensic accounting and investigation
methodology comes from decades of experience, both
within the industry and as external investigators.

This section provides a general outline of the phases
and sub-phases of our investigative approach, the
objectives of each sub-phase, and example activities
within each sub-phase.

Every investigation will have its own nuances and the
activities will vary; however, our standard approach
allows us to gather and assess the necessary
information to ensure all the facts are uncovered, and
any anomalies are properly reviewed and addressed in
a timely and cost-effective manner.

BDO anticipates that its Phase 1 assessment will be
completed within the allotted four-month timeframe.

PHASE 1 – INITIAL ASSESSMENT

1. Information Gathering and Analysis of Existing
Controls.
a) Objective
i. Gain an understanding of the:

1. Financial anomalies known to date.

2. System of internal controls within the City’s
Treasury function and related functions.
ii. Gather relevant data for further analysis.
b) Example activities to be conducted
i. Conducting kickoff meeting with relevant/key City
of Banning personnel to understand known financial
anomalies.
ii. Gaining an understanding of the internal controls
which were, or were not in place, in order to
understand any weaknesses which could be
exploited.
iii. Preliminary interviews with select staff to
understand how key processes work in practice and
understand if there are any known concern areas.
iv. Development and submission of Provided by Client
(“PBC”) List. Requests may include, but are not
limited to:

1. Relevant policies and procedures,

2. Process maps,

3. Organizational charts,

4. Financial data (e.g., financial statements,
bank statements, detailed general ledger,
chart of accounts) or read-only system access,

5. Payment registers (e.g., accounts payable,
payroll),

6. Fringe benefits data,

7. Standard reports (e.g., financial, audits) and
reconciliations,

8. Employee data (e.g., employee
contracts/agreements, timesheets,
current/past rosters, human resources
employee file, job descriptions, compensation
reports), or

9. Email/SMS/WhatsApp communications.
v. Development of profile for potential fraudster(s),
identifying characteristics and components
associated with the fraud triangle.
vi. Facilitating stakeholder communications
considerations and planning.
 An implementation plan that describes in detail (i) the methods, including controls by which your firm or entity manages projects of the type sought by this RFP; (ii) methodology for soliciting and documenting views of internal and external stakeholders; (iii) and any other project management or implementation strategies or techniques that the respondent intends to employ in carrying out the work.  Detailed description of efforts your firm or entity will undertake to achieve client satisfaction and to satisfy the requirements of the "Scope of Work" section. 750
7 BDO | A Proposal to Provide Professional Services for City of Banning, CA Detailed Investigation Technical Approach

2. Pre-Analytic Procedures
a) Objective
i. Analyze data/documentation provided by the City
in order to preliminarily assess any known and
unknown financial anomalies.
b) Example activities to be conducted
i. Performing custom data analytics to identify
trends, anomalies in data.
ii. Performing judgmental and/or statistical sampling
(whichever appropriate) and conduct testing of
specific transactions (financial and non-financial),
including review of supporting documentation to
ensure proposed and authorized payments match
actual disbursements.
iii. Reconciliation of accounts, including reconstruction of prior reconciliations already completed.
iv. Horizontal Analysis – Period to period analysis of
account balances.
v. Vertical Analysis – Reviewing of each line item on a financial statement as a percentage of another line
item in comparison to prior periods.
vi. Fair Market Analysis – Conducting analysis of
specific goods/services in local marketplace,
including getting bids from local vendors, to
establish market-level prices and then compare to
prices charged to the City.
vii. Performing tracking of misconduct, including
review of general ledger detail and billing reports,
to determine if donor/external funder funds were
misappropriated

3. Investigative Interviews and Site Visits
a) Objective
i. Gain a further understanding of observed
anomalies from sub-phase 2.
ii. Obtaining any knowledge (direct or indirect) of
known fraudulent activity perpetrated, alleged, or
suspected by the interviewee and requesting any
relevant files or communications to support claims
made.
iii. Corroborate facts on the ground.
b) Example activities to be conducted
i. Performing detailed walkthroughs with identified
personnel involved in potentially compromised
processes and related control procedures to
understand how the processes operate in practice,
which may be different than
documented/established procedures.
ii. Conducting initial investigative interviews.

Interviews can be conducted virtually any time
during an investigation, depending on the urgency
of the need to interview suspicious parties. For
example, if the suspicious parties are at risk of
leaving/resigning/fleeing, their interviews could
be expedited at the start of investigation
proceedings, however it is best practice to hold
these interviews until the end.
iii. Reviewing identified anomalies in data, abnormal
transactions, unauthorized transactions with
interviewees and obtaining their explanations as to
how these anomalies may have taken place.
iv. Interviewing related third parties (e.g., vendors,
beneficiaries, citizens), depending on the nature
of the identified misconduct.
v. Completing site visits at partner, affiliate, vendor, or other third-party offices related to observed
anomalies
 An implementation plan that describes in detail (i) the methods, including controls by which your firm or entity manages projects of the type sought by this RFP; (ii) methodology for soliciting and documenting views of internal and external stakeholders; (iii) and any other project management or implementation strategies or techniques that the respondent intends to employ in carrying out the work.  Detailed description of efforts your firm or entity will undertake to achieve client satisfaction and to satisfy the requirements of the "Scope of Work" section. 751
8 BDO | A Proposal to Provide Professional Services for City of Banning, CA Detailed Investigation Technical Approach

4. Preliminary Reporting
a) Objective
i. Ensure identified the City stakeholders are aware of investigation methodology, progress, proceedings,
and preliminary findings.
b) Example activities to be conducted
i. Providing regular status update reports which
include activities accomplished, to be
accomplished, billing status, and other relevant
data points determined by the City.
ii. Conducting frequent (e.g., weekly, bi-weekly,
monthly) and ad-hoc check-in phone calls to discuss
investigation progress.
iii. Examples of Preliminary Report deliverables:

1. Oral presentation of preliminary findings to date,
as requested by the City

2. Preliminary reporting to the City Council (as
requested by the City ) to report significant
findings, or to obtain authorization for any
expansion of the scope of services, if required.

3. Other preliminary reports as requested by the
City
iv. Note – The City will be informed of progress as
frequent as desired and BDO’s preliminary
reporting can happen at any part of Phase 1,
especially if strong suspicions of misconduct are
present.
 An implementation plan that describes in detail (i) the methods, including controls by which your firm or entity manages projects of the type sought by this RFP; (ii) methodology for soliciting and documenting views of internal and external stakeholders; (iii) and any other project management or implementation strategies or techniques that the respondent intends to employ in carrying out the work.  Detailed description of efforts your firm or entity will undertake to achieve client satisfaction and to satisfy the requirements of the "Scope of Work" section.

PHASE 2 – DETAILED ANALYSIS

5. Forensic Examination
a) Objective
i. Further investigate observed anomalies identified
in Phase 1.
ii. Provide quantifiable measure for the likelihood
and/or magnitude of the misconduct which was
observed/verified in Phase 1.
iii. Note – This sub-phase will only be applicable if
anomalies are found in Phase 1 which require
further analysis. The scope the investigation
procedures in this sub-phase will be
established/approved by the City.
b) Example activities to be conducted
i. Performing further analysis on identified areas of
concern, including detailed reconciliations,
document analysis, funds tracing, etc…
ii. Performing further investigative interviews,
including follow up discussions and admissionseeking interviews. iii. Determining potential complicit or negligent
parties related to observed misconduct.
iv. Providing Rough Order of Magnitude (“ROM”) to
summarize impact of misconduct.

1. Where determination of the actual misconduct
value involves additional extensive investigation,
we will discuss with the City and then note our
approach for these cases, which could involve
additional follow up on the investigation,
additional testing, ROM, and extrapolating
findings as options.
v. Extrapolating findings of fraudulent activity from
sample review to a larger population for periods
and transactions not tested.
vi. Determining non-financial impact, such as funder
compliance and possible disclosures which need to
be made.
752
9 BDO | A Proposal to Provide Professional Services for City of Banning, CA Detailed Investigation Technical Approach

7. Final Reporting
a) Objective
i. Ensure identified City stakeholders are aware of
investigation findings and next steps.
b) Example activities to be conducted
i. Examples of Final Report deliverables:

1. Final reporting (formal or oral) on findings to
date, as requested by the City key
stakeholders.

2. Detailed report with complete findings of
investigation proceedings, including
schedules, appendices, and accompanying
work papers

3. Reporting to the City Council (as requested
by the City ) to report significant findings, or
to obtain authorization for any expansion of
the scope of services, if required.

4. Other reports as requested by the City

5. Management-level reports with executive
summary of findings, recommendations of
improvements, and next Phases.

6. Audit Committee report and/or oral
presentations discussing findings from
investigation proceedings.

7. Specialized reports for donors.
 An implementation plan that describes in detail (i) the methods, including controls by which your firm or entity manages projects of the type sought by this RFP; (ii) methodology for soliciting and documenting views of internal and external stakeholders; (iii) and any other project management or implementation strategies or techniques that the respondent intends to employ in carrying out the work.  Detailed description of efforts your firm or entity will undertake to achieve client satisfaction and to satisfy the requirements of the "Scope of Work" section.

6. Evaluating Controls and Developing
Recommendations (if applicable)
a) Objective
i. Determine where control weaknesses existed
which may have allowed misconduct to be
perpetrated, or present opportunity for fraud to
occur, and provide control improvement
recommendations which properly mitigate future
risks of misconduct.
ii. Note – This sub-phase will only be applicable if
control weaknesses are found in Phase 1.
b) Example activities to be conducted
i. Developing Gap Assessment matrix detailing where
breakdowns in control procedures design or
execution exist. Conducting risk assessment on
compromised processes and providing “Heat Map”
with risk ratings based on likelihood, impact, and
pervasiveness of the risks observed.
ii. Providing detailed recommendations on control
improvements, including changes to documented
policies and procedures and addition and/or
redesign of control procedures.
iii. Developing process flow diagrams, including
proposed future states which include the
implementation of improved control procedures.
iv. Drafting revised policies and procedures.
v. Conducting training on proper internal control
practices, fraud awareness, etc.. As part of a potential Phase 3, BDO is available to support the City with
analysis/reporting related to assisting
the City to collect any potentially
recoverable losses. The City will
provide prior approval prior to the
commencement of any expanded
scope procedures.
753
10 BDO | A Proposal to Provide Professional Services for City of Banning, CA  Detailed project schedule, identifying all tasks and deliverables to be performed, durations for each task, and overall time of completion, including a complete transition plan. Include your plan to deal with fluctuation in service needs and any associated price adjustments.

Project Schedule
We estimate the earliest start date to be January 2024 and anticipate the Phase 1 work to be complete within the allotted 4 months (as referenced in the RFP). This timeline assumes that we are able to complete our work efficiently.

In order to do so, we must be able to schedule meetings timely, receive responses to questions and requests regularly, and have the collaboration and cooperation of the City's selected engagement team.

The time estimate below is only for Phase 1. Upon the completion of Phase 1, and with the approval from the City, BDO will provide additional time and cost estimates for Phase 2 and 3 work, if they are necessary.

Project Management
Months
Phase 1 1 2 3 4

1. Information
Gathering & Controls
1 Month

2. Pre-Analytic
Procedures
1 Month

3. Investigative
Interviews & Site
Visits

1.5 Months

4. Preliminary
Reporting .5
Months
754
11 BDO | A Proposal to Provide Professional Services for City of Banning, CA  Detailed description of specific tasks you will require from City staff. Explain what the respective roles of City staff and your staff would be to complete the tasks specified in the Scope of Work.

Tasks for City Staff/Use of City Facilities
Our forensic accounting and investigation services may necessitate certain interactions with City staff, depending on the direction and findings of our initial analyses. While the exact nature and extent of this assistance remain to be determined, it could potentially include providing access to financial records, support in coordinating interviews with personnel, and guidance in navigating City databases and systems. It could also include actual fact-gathering interviews. As shown in the section titled Project Management Structure on page nineteen, BDO will assign a full-time Project Manager to drive project completion and to mitigate any administrative burden of the City’s personnel. We aim to work collaboratively with the City staff, ensuring that any involvement is as streamlined and minimally intrusive as possible.

In terms of utilizing City-owned facilities or properties, our current plan maintains flexibility. Depending on the progress and specific requirements of our investigation, we might explore the possibility of using secure office space within a City-owned building for our team's operations while they are on-site. This would facilitate close collaboration with City staff and ensure the confidentiality of our work. However, this is only a potential scenario, and our use of such facilities will be evaluated and discussed in detail as our project requirements become clearer. In sensitive situations, such as admission-seeking interviews, we prefer to take our work off-site.

We do not anticipate requiring any City property or space that would require the City to take on additional cost for this engagement. We expect to be able to complete the majority of the work remotely; however, during the course of the engagement, circumstances may require temporary access to City facilities or equipment. For example, should we need to interview staff on-site, we would request the use of conference room space. Similarly, if our team needs to review records that are solely kept as hard copy documents, we will request access to those documents as well as an on-site workspace to review the files.
 Proposers are also requested to identify any City owned facilities or property which Proposer would propose to use or lease, purchase, or rent from the City in connection with the services to be performed, including information about the terms of any proposed lease, purchase or use of such equipment and facilities, and how this proposed structure affects the overall cost proposal to the City, if applicable. 755
12 BDO | A Proposal to Provide Professional Services for City of Banning, CA At BDO, we tailor each approach for our client since there is rarely a one-size-fits-all solution. This is especially true in forensic examinations, which often require out-of-the box thinking and innovative analysis techniques. As we learn more about your organization, we will be able to hone our approach to your needs. Below are a few examples of how this flexible approach has benefitted similar clients.

BDO Helps Company Investigate Qui Tam Allegations Concerning Misclassified Costs Client Need In support of a qui tam matter, a company engaged BDO to perform a forensic investigation of claims alleging widespread cost misclassification and indirect cost rate manipulation over the life of an 8-year grant program. BDO Solution In support of this engagement, BDO:
• Analyzed over eight years of GL transactions and subsidiary ledger data to identify high-risk transactions of interest and visualized results. • Performed 100% review of high-risk, high-value transactions for allowability and appropriate classification, while testing the remaining population of transactions in accordance with regulatory sampling guidance.
• Conducted statistical sampling and testing of moderate risk areas • Developed model to quantify the cost impact of unallowable/misclassified transactions by funding source.
• Prepared expert report for presentation of findings and quantified potential exposure to the Office of Inspector General (OIG). BDO Supports Organization with Investigation of Time Charging and Procurement Irregularities Client NeedA large organization with multiple federal government contract and grants engaged BDO, under the privilege of counsel, to perform a forensic investigation of time mischarging, vendor overpayment, shell company transactions, conflicts of interest, and irregularities in contracting with small businesses. BDO Solution As part of this engagement, BDO:
• Analyzed multiple years of time charging data to determine whether individuals supporting multiple programs concurrently were mischarging time dependent on available program budget.
• Leveraged CaseWare Idea to efficiently extract pertinent information from PDF documentation and integrated with ERP procurement data to evaluate purchasing irregularities.
• Quantified potential exposure and provided expert report of findings to counsel and executive leadership.

BDO Assists Large Healthcare Company with Analysis of Corporate Credit Card Transactions Client Need A large healthcare company engaged BDO to investigate whether director-level employees were inappropriately charging personal expenses on company-provided credit cards. BDO Solution
During this engagement, BDO:
• Worked directly with the client’s IT personnel to extract and load three years of expense and credit card data into a SQL database for analysis. • Utilized Able2Extract to mine additional attributes from credit card statements to facilitate identification of potential personal charges. • Flagged transactions of interest and imported into BDO’s proprietary forensic analytics tool to research potential issues in real-time with client. • Quantified potential exposure and provided report of findings to client.  Proposers are encouraged to provide additional innovative and/or creative approaches for providing the service that will maximize efficient, cost-effective operations or increased performance capabilities. In addition, the City will consider proposals that offer alternative service delivery means and methods for the services desired.
756
13 BDO | A Proposal to Provide Professional Services for City of Banning, CA V.B.B Company Information
757
14 BDO | A Proposal to Provide Professional Services for City of Banning, CA o This section shall include contact person information, address and telephone number of the company main office and branch offices. Each Company shall identify itself as to the type of organizational entity (corporation, sole proprietorship, partnership, joint venture, etc.). Any supplemental information that Company believes may be pertinent to the selection process may be provided.

List of Company Locations
Chicago, IL; Oakbrook, IL; Huntsville, AL; Anchorage, AK; Phoenix, AZ; Los Angeles, CA; San Diego, CA; San Jose, CA; Orange County, CA; San Francisco, CA; Boulder, CO; Denver, CO; Greeley CO; Stamford, CT; Wilmington, DE; Washington D.C.; Boca Raton, FL; Miami, FL; Tampa, FL; Fort Lauderdale, FL; Orlando, FL; West Palm Beach, FL; Jacksonville, FL; Atlanta, GA; Rosemont, IL; Indianapolis, IA; Baltimore, MD; Columbia, MD; Boston, MA; Gardner, MA; Detroit, MI; Grand Rapids, MI; Kalamazoo, MI; Minneapolis, MN; St. Louis, MO; Las Vegas, NV; Cherry Hill, NJ; Woodbridge, NJ; Long Island, NY; New York, NY; Valhalla, NY; Charlotte, NC; Raleigh, NC; Akron, OH; Cleveland, OH; Columbus, OH; Cincinnati, OH; Tulsa, OK; Philadelphia, PA; Pittsburgh, PA; Greenville, SC; Memphis, TN; Nashville, TN; Austin, TX; Fort Worth, TX; San Antonio, TX; Dallas, TX; Houston, TX; Salt Lake City, UT; Norfolk, VA; Richmond, VA; Seattle, WA; Spokane, WA; Madison, WI; Milwaukee, WI.

BDO USA, P.C., a Virginia professional corporation, is the U.S. Member of BDO International Limited, a UK company limited by guarantee, which forms part of the international BDO network of independent member firms, the world’s fifth largest accountancy network. BDO International employs over 111,300 employees, has over 1,800 worldwide offices in over 160 countries. Our worldwide revenue last year topped $12.8 billion.

Contact Person Sly Atayee – Project Manager
Contact Information 703-965-2792
[email protected]
BDO Headquarters Headquarters: Chicago Office
330 N. Wabash Ave., Suite 3200
Chicago, IL 60611
While we are headquartered in
Chicago BDO serves clients
nationally across more than 75
offices in the U.S, including our
Los Angeles office.
758
15 BDO | A Proposal to Provide Professional Services for City of Banning, CA About BDO
As a global business advisor, we deliver insight-driven perspectives through a comprehensive array of assurance, tax, and advisory services to help you navigate challenges, uncover opportunities, and adapt to the constantly changing business environment.

BDO USA *
$2.82
U.S. Revenue

13.3%
Increase over last year
75+
Offices
860
Principals
12,000+
Total Personnel
BDO USA *
$2.82
U.S. Revenue

13.3%
Increase over last year
75+
Offices
860
Principals
12,000+
Total Personnel
BDO INTERNATIONAL **
$12.8
Global Revenue
160+
Countries
1,800+
Offices
7,744
Partners and Principals
111,300+
Total Personnel
BDO INTERNATIONAL **
$12.8
Global Revenue
160+
Countries
1,800+
Offices
7,744
Partners and Principals
111,300+
Total Personnel ** BDO International statistics for the year ended September 30, 2022.

Locations include exclusive alliances of BDO Member Firms. * BDO USA statistics for the year ended April 30, 2023. o This section shall include contact person information, address and telephone number of the company main office and branch offices. Each Company shall identify itself as to the type of organizational entity (corporation, sole proprietorship, partnership, joint venture, etc.). Any supplemental information that Company believes may be pertinent to the selection process may be provided. 759
16 BDO | A Proposal to Provide Professional Services for City of Banning, CA o The proposer should provide an affirmative statement that it is independent of the City as defined by generally accepted auditing standards and the U.S. General Accounting Office's Government Auditing Standards (1994).

The City’s proposed engagement team is independent as defined by current professional standards. We confirm BDO currently has no interest and shall not acquire any interest—direct or indirect—which would conflict in any manner or degree with the performance of our services under the contract. 760
17 BDO | A Proposal to Provide Professional Services for City of Banning, CA o The Proposal shall identify any litigation, mediation, or arbitration, regarding the performance of any services similar to the Services, in which the Company has been involved in the past five (5) years. If the Services require a license or certification, the Proposal shall include any claims or disciplinary action taken against Company or any of Company’s key personnel within the past five years.

Litigation
During the past five years, BDO USA has been a defendant in a number of actions, proceedings, claims or complaints.

The volume of claims and suits is normal level of litigation for a national accounting practice. The ultimate outcome of any claim, proceeding, or lawsuit cannot be predicted with certainty, and sometimes BDO settles these matters to avoid the cost of future litigation. In addition, BDO carries professional liability insurance to protect against costs associated with claims.

The outcome of the matters that have come to a conclusion, either by settlement or otherwise, both individually and in the aggregate, have not had a material adverse effect on the ability of BDO to serve clients, or on the consolidated financial position of BDO.
761
18 BDO | A Proposal to Provide Professional Services for City of Banning, CA V.B.C Company Personnel
762
19 BDO | A Proposal to Provide Professional Services for City of Banning, CA o This section shall contain names, contact numbers and description of experience, including licenses and/or certifications, of all key personnel who would be assigned to perform the Services. Members of the Company’s professional team (managers, contact person, etc.) should be identified by name, title, phone number, and description of the portion of work they will be assigned to perform under this Agreement. Also include major subcontractors (if any) and their degree of involvement in this program. If the Company is including any subcontractors, the Company shall identify how long the Company has worked with the subcontractor.

Project Management Structure

A STREAMLINED STRUCTURE THAT DRIVES BEST VALUE FOR MONEY BDO can deploy a variety of teams and resources to meet the needs of any particular investigation. We provide our clients with deep technical knowledge, critical forensic investigation techniques, and state and local government industry expertise. BDO prides itself on cost efficiency, which is realized through the efficient use of select experts on each engagement.

BDO establishes a streamlined project management structure for each engagement. Below we have the proposed management structure for this engagement, which can either be expanded, utilizing the thousands of staff resources at our disposal to ensure a comprehensive and timely analysis, or pared down to ensure cost effectiveness.

Nic will provide industry subject matter expertise around the inner-workings of municipal governments. He will also provide a second layer review for all deliverable work products to ensure the high quality of deliverables.

As the Project Director, and with extensive knowledge of state and local government operations, Corey will provide oversight on all project activities and reporting. Corey will act as the liaison to City Management, Board of Directors and any sub-committees (e.g., Audit Committee, Risk Committee, etc..).

RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE PROJECT DIRECTOR
Sly, an expert in forensic investigations, will act as the main point of contact for BDO and will lead the day-to-day operations of the investigation. This includes driving the completion of investigation activities, developing project plans, overseeing project staff, ensuring objectives are met, ensuring timelines/deadlines remain in focus, and deliverables have proper first layer reviews.

RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE PROJECT MANAGER

RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE INDUSTRY SUBJECT MATTER EXPERT
David will provide subject matter expertise, both from the forensic analysis and state/local government industry perspectives. As a CFE, David has extensive experience with investigation and risk management techniques. He also regularly advises state and local governments on aspects of financial management, including developing robust financial management systems for billions of ARPA dollars.

RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE TECHNICAL SUBJECT MATTER EXPERT BDO has access to thousands of staff-level resources which are available to perform analyses, document review and more at an efficient cost to the City.

RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE STAFF-LEVEL RESOURCES
763
20 BDO | A Proposal to Provide Professional Services for City of Banning, CA  Creation of government planning guidance
 Production of INGOs standards and best practices in service delivery  Modernization of legacy CRM and financial assistance systems  Design and implementation of client experience strategies  Implementation of safety standards and procedures
Corey is dedicated to superior client experience and strong partnerships. Corey sees client experience as the foundational of service and has developed partnerships within all levels of government, community-based organizations, faith-based organizations, the private sector, foundations, international NGOS, and the United Nations.

Navigating the circles of academia, policy, and practice is where Corey thrives.

Corey also serves as a Senior Fellow at the Disaster Resilience Leadership Academy at Tulane University.

PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
International Association of Emergency Managers
International Humanitarian Studies Association
National Voluntary Organizations Active in Disaster

EDUCATION
M.S., International Development, Tulane University
B.A., Communications, California Baptist University
[email protected]
Direct: 703-770-1015
Mobile: 571-385-6132
8401 Greensboro Drive
Suite 800
Mclean, VA 22102
Tel: 703-893-0600
Fax: 703-893-2766
www.bdo.com

COREY EIDE
Managing Director, Industry Specialty Services

EXPERIENCE
Corey Eide supports clients’ investment in resilience. As Director, Industry Specialty Services, Corey serves a wide variety of clients in federal, state, tribal, local, territory government, and nonprofit organizations. Corey works across the competencies and capabilities of BDO to provide tailored services for unique client needs.

Prior to joining BDO, Corey served in leadership roles in nonprofit and international government organizations where he led strategic planning initiatives, change management, and enterprise program design and delivery. Over the past 15 years, Corey has supported capacity building in communities across the US, provided technical assistance following disasters, and served as a senior agency representative to FEMA and the World Health Organization. Corey has overseen the implementation of government grants, designed financial controls, and crafted nimble learning solutions.

Specific examples include the:
764
21 BDO | A Proposal to Provide Professional Services for City of Banning, CA  Sly has passed all parts of the Certified Fraud Examiners exam and is waiting to receive his official license
American Bar Association, Young Lawyers Division

EDUCATION
B.B.A., Finance, Cum Laude, James Madison University

LANGUAGE PROFICIENCIES
Bilingual proficiency in English and Farsi (speaking)
[email protected]
Direct: +703-336-1689
Mobile: +703-965-2792
8401 Greensboro Drive
Suite 800
McLean, VA 22102
Tel: +703-893-0600
Fax: +703-893-2766
www.bdo.com

SLY ATAYEE
Senior Manager, Industry Specialty Services

EXPERIENCE
Sly Atayee is a Senior Manager in BDO’s Industry Specialty Services practice, focused on assisting clients with various aspects of forensic and financial analysis. Examples of his in-depth work experiences includes forensic and statistical analysis, fraud investigations, internal control assessments, financial process redesign, complex cost recovery calculations, defective pricing analysis, policy and procedure development and support, and assisting with other various tasks.

Sly has in-depth experience working within the COSO Internal Control Framework and developing robust control systems for a wide range of nonprofit organizations.

Sly has led numerous forensic investigations both domestically in the US, and internationally in Africa, Asia and the Middle East. His experience includes leading project teams in large-scale investigations to quantify potential losses suffered from fraud, waste or abuse and also developing and implementing corrective action plans to ensure fraud risks are properly mitigated and addressed in the future.

Sly also has experience in litigation support, substantiating costs through the collection of supporting documentation, performing data analytics in order to calculate and quantify losses and economic damages, whether suffered through tort, breach of contract, fraud, or misconduct, as well as market analysis for procurement.

Many of Sly’s engagements have been privileged and were conducted through the client’s legal counsel.

PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
Member, Association of Certified Fraud Examiners

Page 19 ends

765
22 BDO | A Proposal to Provide Professional Services for City of Banning, CA

EXPERIENCE
Nic Nunn-Faron serves as Manager in BDO’s State & Local Government Advisory practice, where he has the opportunity to apply varied experience in policy development, planning, risk management, and grants administration to meet the resilience and sustainability needs of public, private, and nongovernmental agencies throughout the United States. Over the past 10 years Nic has been charged with the management and oversight of engagements for city, county, state, tribal, territorial, federal government, higher education, and nonprofit organizations.

Nic has managed over a half dozen COVID-19 engagements with state and local governments, developing the strategy, management infrastructure, and oversight for their Stimulus Funds.

He serves as a key resource for the firm’s Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Advisory capability develop team, where he is able to utilize his background in sustainable development and enterprise risk management to advance the services by which BDO assists its clients in becoming more resilient against and better stewards of the environment and society. His primary area of focus is in utilizing sustainability reporting principles to assist jurisdictions in implementing infrastructure and development strategies.

Prior to joining BDO, Nic supported program management operations for local municipalities, led technical response operations following natural disasters, served as an agency field liaison to FEMA, coordinated with the United Nations cluster system, and responded as part of over a dozen emergency operations throughout the United States and abroad.

PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
Global Reporting Initiative, Certified Sustainability Professional (CSP) International Association of Emergency Managers, Certified Emergency Manager (CEM) Disaster Recovery Institute International, Certified Business Continuity Professional (CBCP)
International City/County Management Association

EDUCATION
M.S., International Development, Tulane University
B.A., Public Policy/Urban Affairs, Saint Louis University

NIC NUNN-FARON, CEM, CSP, CBCP
Senior Manager, Industry Specialty Services
[email protected]
Direct: 314-889-1183
Mobile: 636-485-5297
101 S Hanley Rd
Suite 800
St. Louis, MO 63105
Tel: 314-889-1100
Fax: 314-889-1101
www.bdo.com
766
23 BDO | A Proposal to Provide Professional Services for City of Banning, CA  Investigate and resolve matters related to regulatory compliance (including false claims), employee misconduct, misappropriation of funds, fraudulent financial reporting, and whistleblower complaints.
 Respond to changing regulatory requirements and evaluate regulatory compliance.  Assess enterprise risks (including fraud risks) and facilitate discussions with senior leaders regarding mitigation and monitoring of the organization’s risk landscape.  Evaluate business operations, policies and procedures, and overarching control environments and implement changes that foster enhanced efficiency, effectiveness, and control.
 Develop, implement, and improve practices related to grants and contracts administration and monitoring.

David also presents at numerous conferences on such topics as regulatory compliance, internal controls, cost allowability, fraud prevention, risk assessments, and corporate governance.

PUBLICATIONS
 “Emerging Audit Trends – What You Need to Know” NCURA Magazine – August 2015  “Emerging Audit Trends – What You Can Do to Prepare” NCURA Magazine – October/November 2015
 “Best Practices for Building a University Audit Plan” ACUA College and University Auditor Journal – Winter 2020

PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
Association of Certified Fraud Examiners
Institute of Internal Auditors (Board Member, Northern Virginia Chapter) National Council of University Research Administrators

EDUCATION
B.S. Commerce (concentrations in Finance and Management), University of Virginia, McIntire School of Business
[email protected]
Direct: +703-3770-1008
Mobile: +703-862-7479
8401 Greensboro Drive
Suite 800
McLean, VA 22102
Tel: +703-893-0600
Fax: +703-893-2766
www.bdo.com

DAVID CLARK, CIA, CFE, CRMA
Managing Director, Industry Specialty Services

EXPERIENCE
David Clark is a Managing Director in BDO’s Non-Profit Advisory Practice. He advises clients on a wide range of issues including matters of organizational strategy, regulatory compliance, cost allowability and recovery issues, risk management, and internal control and operational assessments. His work includes extensive experience supporting federal funding recipients including colleges and universities, non-profits, research institutions, and government contractors.

David offers over 13 years of experience providing guidance and support for organizations of all sizes in improving compliance, governance, operations, and risk management activities. He often works with clients to evaluate and enhance business processes and control environments, as well as evaluating compliance with federal spending regulations. Prior to joining BDO, David served as a senior audit manager at a leading financial institution and served as a Director in the Higher Education and Research Institutions consulting practice of an international accounting firm. David’s deep knowledge of compliance, risk, and controls and industry experience allows him to provide personal, practical solutions for clients.

David's specific experience includes helping organizations:
767
24 BDO | A Proposal to Provide Professional Services for City of Banning, CA o An affirmative statement should be included that the proposer and all assigned key professional staff are properly licensed to practice in California.

Where required, our proposed team members have the appropriate licenses and certifications to perform the requested work in California.
768
25 BDO | A Proposal to Provide Professional Services for City of Banning, CA V.B.D Disclosure
769
26 BDO | A Proposal to Provide Professional Services for City of Banning, CA o Please disclose any and all past or current business and personal relationships with any current Banning elected official, appointed official, City employee, or family member of any current Banning elected official, appointed official, or City employee. Any past or current business relationship may not disqualify the firm from consideration.

We have made appropriate conflict of interest inquiries in accordance with our quality assurance procedures, and can confirm that our appointment by you will not give rise to any conflicts. 770
27 BDO | A Proposal to Provide Professional Services for City of Banning, CA V.B.E Evidence and References
771
28 BDO | A Proposal to Provide Professional Services for City of Banning, CA o The Proposal must demonstrate that the Company, or its key personnel, meets the minimum experience requirement in #Prerequisites with a legally registered business name, that provides services of a similar type and scope as described in the Scope of Services. A Company shall not have filed for bankruptcy under any business name over the past five (5) years.

BDO USA, P.C. is a Virginia professional corporation. In our more than 110-year history, BDO has never filed for bankruptcy.

As noted, in our proposed team’s resumes, BDO will bring significant experience to this engagement:
 Corey Eide has over 15 years of exceptional experience, establishing himself as a highly accomplished professional in the field. His extensive expertise and unwavering commitment have made him a trusted leader in the industry.  Sly Atayee has over 8 years of invaluable experience at BDO, establishing himself as a highly accomplished Senior Manager in the Industry Specialty Services practice. He has consistently demonstrated his exceptional skills in managing complex investigations and delivering outstanding results. Sly's role as a Senior Manager has involved overseeing a diverse range of projects, including financial advisory, risk management, and business consulting.  Nic Nunn-Faron brings 10-plus years experience with BDO managing and overseeing engagements for city, county, state, tribal, territorial, federal government, higher education, and nonprofit organizations.  David Clark offers over 13 years of experience providing guidance and support for organizations of all sizes in improving compliance, governance, operations, and risk management activities. 772
29 BDO | A Proposal to Provide Professional Services for City of Banning, CA History of BDO
Since our founding, the BDO
story has been one of continuous
response to our clients’ and peoples’
ever-changing needs.

Our history reflects the continuity and stability of a
network that has developed so successfully over more
than fifty turbulent years. Equally, our partners and
staff know that they are working for a well-established organization that is built upon clear values and a
successful past.

But for BDO, it does not stop there. We live and
operate in a challenging environment characterized by
an unpredictable global economy, ongoing political
upheavals, and the ever-present threat of terrorism
In common with all businesses, we must take strategic
decisions to ensure that we can continue to attract
global clients, enter new markets, improve
performance, and manage risk. We have invested in
global infrastructure technology and are ready—this is
what sets us apart from our competitors.

Above all, we will continue to deliver the exceptional
client service for which we are known, because this is
what differentiates us in our market. Technical
excellence is a given, but our exceptional client
service program is embedded in our strategy and
undertaken on a truly global level.
o The Proposal must demonstrate that the Company, or its key personnel, meets the minimum experience requirement in #Prerequisites with a legally registered business name, that provides services of a similar type and scope as described in the Scope of Services. A Company shall not have filed for bankruptcy under any business name over the past five (5) years.

III.A Years of experience
Have at least ten (10) years’ of experience, within the past ten (10) years under a legally registered business name, in providing services of a similar type and scope as described in the Scope of Services. Have not filed for bankruptcy under any business name over the past five (5) years.
773
30 BDO | A Proposal to Provide Professional Services for City of Banning, CA Public Sector Industry Credentials

THOUGHT LEADERSHIP AND CLIENT

EDUCATION
We demonstrate our knowledge and experience in our
relevant client work and thought leadership — from
proprietary research to timely reports and industry
events, BDO is at the forefront of the public sector
conversation and believe in the power of industry
participation. Many of our practice professionals are in the field with our clients, author articles on salient
issues, and comment on breaking news. We are
speakers at industry conferences and seminars, are
active in organizations and trade associations, and
serve as resources for trade publications.

Our goal is to bring perspective on opportunities,
trends, issues and regulations that frame our approach
and services to address our clients’ needs.

Publications and technical updates
We share our knowledge through a variety of thought
leadership, keeping you abreast of relevant news and
hot topics that go beyond balance sheets and financial
statements.
 BDOKnows — series of newsletters, flash reports and
in-depth discussions addressing significant financial
reporting developments.
 Public-Private Partnership (P3s) — Drawing upon
our P3 practice’s 20+ year history, BDO’s
mobilization process can capture the unique
nuances to develop tailored strategies to win
alignment and approval for your development goals.
 Significant Accounting and Reporting Matters
Guide — quarterly digest of final and proposed
financial accounting standards.
 GASB, FASB, and Single Audit Flash Reports —
information about selected developments and
emerging issues are immediately e-mailed to BDO
professionals for timely communication to clients.
 Tax Newsletters and Alerts — updates on federal,
state, local, expatriate, and international
developments along with other specific tax planning
and strategy considerations.
 Industry Newsletters, Alerts, Reports, Proprietary
Studies, Infographics, and Surveys — a variety of
publications depicting specific industry issues,
emerging trends, and developments.

Topical resources available for our clients, include:
 Community Infrastructure Act: Community
Infrastructure
 Community Resilience: Community Resilience
 Innovation and Transformation: Business Innovation
 Corporate Governance and Financial Reporting:

Corporate Governance
 Single Audit: Frequently Asked Questions
 OMB Uniform Guidance
 The Latest in COVID-19 Funding Compliance
Guidance
o The Proposal must demonstrate that the Company, or its key personnel, meets the minimum experience requirement in #Prerequisites with a legally registered business name, that provides services of a similar type and scope as described in the Scope of Services. A Company shall not have filed for bankruptcy under any business name over the past five (5) years.

III.A Years of experience
Have at least ten (10) years’ of experience, within the past ten (10) years under a legally registered business name, in providing services of a similar type and scope as described in the Scope of Services. Have not filed for bankruptcy under any business name over the past five (5) years.
774
31 BDO | A Proposal to Provide Professional Services for City of Banning, CA Fraud, Investigations, & Disputes
We provide exceptional service for
exceptional circumstances. When
scrutiny is most intense, organizations
must not only determine the facts, but
also determine them quickly.

FORENSIC ACCOUNTING & INVESTIGATIONS
BDO’s forensic accounting professionals provide
strategic guidance to organizations across the country
and around the world, helping them resolve high-stakes
matters involving fraud and corruption, accounting
irregularities, and a wide variety of compliance issues.  Corporate Investigations
 Anti-Bribery and
Corruption Investigations
 Fraud Prevention
 Global Investigations
 Government
Investigations
 Fraud Analytics
 Books and Records
Review
 Due Diligence
 Anti-Money Laundering
Law (AML), Bank Secrecy
Act (BSA), and Office of
Foreign Asset Control
(OFAC)
 Post-acquisition Disputes
 Monitorships
 Damages Analysis
o The Proposal must demonstrate that the Company, or its key personnel, meets the minimum experience requirement in #Prerequisites with a legally registered business name, that provides services of a similar type and scope as described in the Scope of Services. A Company shall not have filed for bankruptcy under any business name over the past five (5) years.

Our forensic accounting services include:
775
32 BDO | A Proposal to Provide Professional Services for City of Banning, CA o Company shall provide at least 3 references, within the past 5 years, of clients for whom services have been performed that are comparable in quality and scope to that specified in this RFP. The references shall include client names, addresses, telephone numbers and e-mail addresses of the clients for whom prior work was performed and include an explanation of the services provided along with project start and end dates.

Client References
Below is a selection of prior engagements showing our technical abilities and quality of service. We invite you to reach out to hear what our clients have to say themselves. Please note that much of our investigation work is done under attorney-client privilege and therefore we are limited in which clients we can disclose in this service area.

ORGANIZATION NAME / TITLE / CONTACT

NUMBER DESCRIPTION OF THE WORK PERFORMED
State of West
Virginia
1900 Kanawha
Boulevard, East
Charleston, WV 25305
Ann Urling
Deputy Chief of Staff
Office of Governor Jim Justice
[email protected]
Phone – (304)-558-2000
• Assisted with the implementation of $4 billion+ of CARES/ARPA funds, including installing a robust risk management program and system of internal controls for the tracking and distribution of government funds
• Performed cost review/forensic analysis of ARPA grant funds to detect unallowable or fraudulent costs – regularly reported findings to Governor's office and provided guidance on proper risk management procedures
• Assisted with responding to Inspector General inquiries and desk reviews/audits
Fairbanks North Star
Borough
907 Terminal Street
Fairbanks, AK 99701
Jim Williams
Chief of Staff
[email protected]
Phone – (907)-459-1305
• Uncovered fraudulent activity within small business grant programs • Assisted with quantifying and assessing instances of fraud • Provided control remediation measures to mitigate future risks of fraud
Feed the Children
333 N. Meridian
Oklahoma City, OK
73107
Christy Tharp
Chief Financial Officer
[email protected]
Phone - (405)-945-4040
• Performed investigation of procurement procedures following allegation of kickbacks at local field office
• Performed Fair Market Analysis to establish reasonable pricing for purchased items to assess potential for fraud/waste/abuse • Completed Internal Control Assessment to ensure control gaps were filled
Planned Parenthood
Global
26 Bleecker St,
New York, NY 10018
Hilary M. Castillo (Currently at
Start NY)
Former Vice President, Global
Operations at PPFA
Chief Operating Officer
[email protected]
Phone – (929)-722-1398
• Conducted investigation of procurement practices following allegation of conflicts of interest at local field office • Completed Internal Control Assessment to ensure control gaps were filled
International Relief
and Development
(now known as
Blumont)
1621 N Kent Street
Arlington, VA 22209
Vladan Ilic (Currently at Winrock
International)
Former Assistant Vice President,
Finance at Blumont
Senior Director, International
Controller at Winrock
[email protected]
Phone – (703)-209-6788
• Led numerous investigations on behalf of the organization with its field operations to determine if waste, fraud, or abuse exists and/or if there is high likelihood for such behaviors
• Assessments required vendor and beneficiary procedures and calculations and potential irregularities.
776
33 BDO | A Proposal to Provide Professional Services for City of Banning, CA Attorney References
As mentioned on the previous slide, much of our investigations work is done under the privilege of outside legal counsel. We invite you to reach out to our valued attorney contacts below for more information on our qualifications. Out of respect for them and their/our client’s privacy, we ask that specific client details not be requested, or those requests be limited. BDO will of course show the same discretion for the City should it be awarded this bid.

ORGANIZATION NAME / TITLE / CONTACT NUMBER
Venable LLP (LAW FIRM)
600 Massachusetts Ave NW
Washington, DC 20001
Dismas Locaria
Partner
[email protected]
Phone – (202)-344-8013
Crowell and Mooring LLP (LAW FIRM)
1001 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20004
Peter Eyre
Partner
[email protected]
Phone – (202)-624-2807
Wiley LLP (LAW FIRM)
2050 M Street NW
Washington, DC 20036
Brian Walsh
Partner
[email protected]
Phone – (202)-719-7469
Bass, Berry & Sims PLC (LAW FIRM)
1201 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20004
Todd R. Overman
Member
[email protected]
Phone - (202)-827-2975
777
34 BDO | A Proposal to Provide Professional Services for City of Banning, CA Appendix
778
35 BDO | A Proposal to Provide Professional Services for City of Banning, CA BDO Considerations of the City’s Sample
Agreement
Proposed Changes to the Contract – BDO USA
BDO USA (“BDO”) has reviewed the City of Banning’s (the “City”) Request for Proposal – Citywide Forensic Accounting and Investigation Services – RFP-23-040 (the “RFP”). We have provided below some exceptions to the City’s Professional Services Agreement (the “Agreement”) for your consideration and are confident that in the event that BDO is awarded any portion of the work as the result of the current RFP, we can reach mutually-agreeable terms that combine the needs of both the City and BDO. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in the RFP, the parties agree that any services shall be subject to such mutually agreeable terms rather than the Agreement.

General Provisions (Section VI, B)

1. Compensation and Method of Payment (Article 2)
a. We would like to add standard non-payment remedies to this section.

2. Schedule of Performance (Section 3.2)
a. We would like to clarify in this section that BDO’s services are contingent upon the timely cooperation of the City and its personnel.

3. Prohibition Against Subcontracting or Assignment (Section 4.5) a. We would like to discuss edits to this Section that would allow personnel from a BDO subsidiary to work on this engagement.

4. Insurance, Indemnification and Bonds (Article 5)
a. BDO is generally able to agree to the insurance coverage provisions of Sections 5.1-5.2, but we would also need to make certain edits to conform with BDO’s insurance coverage. b. We would like to remove Section 5.3.A as inapplicable to the contemplated services. c. As BDO’s services are intended solely for our clients and not for third parties, we do not typically give broad indemnities to our clients to cover claims brough by third parties. Accordingly, we cannot agree to the indemnity in Section 5.3.B(1), but we’d be happy to work on a compromise. d. As is standard for our professional services and industry, BDO would like to discuss certain applicable indemnities that we receive from our clients for our professional services. e. Limitation of liability: BDO would also like to discuss including language in the Agreement to the effect that, absent a party’s fraud or intentional misconduct, both parties should be responsible for only direct and compensatory damages, and that BDO’s total liability under the agreement be limited to some mutually agreeable amount.

5. Ownership of Documents (Section 6.3)
a. We would like to clarify in this section that the City will own BDO’s final deliverables. b. We would like to include a provision in this section that states that BDO retains ownership of our internal work papers that support and substantiate our services and include items such as work programs and analyses that do not constitute part of the deliverables to the City.

6. California Law (Section 7.1)
a. BDO’s strong preference is to resolve disputes through binding arbitration. We would like to discuss whether the City would consider a binding arbitration provision. If no, we can agree to resolve disputes by a bench trial, subject to a standard jury trial waiver.

BDO USA refers to BDO USA, P.C., a Virginia professional corporation, also doing business in certain jurisdictions with an alternative identifying abbreviation, such as Corp. or P.S.C.
779
36 BDO | A Proposal to Provide Professional Services for City of Banning, CA BDO Considerations of the City’s Sample
Agreement Cont.

1. Liquidated Damages (Section 7.7)
a. We would like to confirm that this section is not applicable.

2. Termination Prior to Expiration of Term (Section 7.8) a. As is standard in BDO’s professional services and industry, we would like to include a termination term that would allow either party to terminate the agreement if required by professional standards or applicable law/regulation.

3. Attorneys’ Fees (Section 7.10)
a. We would like to remove this provision. BDO cannot agree to reimburse the City for its attorneys’ fees incurred in the enforcement of any remedies under the Agreement.

4. Conflict of Interest (Section 8.2)
a. Because BDO is a large professional services firm with operations throughout the U.S., we would like to limit this provision to the principals and employees providing services under the Agreement.

Additional Terms and Conditions
As a public accounting firm and consistent with industry standards, BDO would need the Agreement to include some of BDO’s standard engagement letter terms which include, among other provisions, terms that reflect BDO’s professional standards, including certain terms required under AICPA guidance. Upon request, we would be happy to provide the City with a template of our standard engagement letter for your review. This letter includes include the following provisions:

1. City Materials
a. We would like to include a provision that clarifies that BDO is entitled to rely on all representations, assumptions, information and data supplied by the City (the “City Materials”) and that the City is authorized to provide BDO with all such City Materials.

2. Third-Parties and Use
a. BDO’s standard agreements contain a provision that clarifies that our services are strictly for our client’s use only and that third parties are not permitted to rely in any manner on our services.

3. Subpoenas
a. We would like to discuss including the standard provision that, in the event of a subpoena or other legal process, the City will compensate BDO for our reasonable, documented time incurred in responding to such subpoena and related reasonable out-of-pocket expenses.

4. Email Communications
a. We would like to discuss adding a standard provision whereby BDO disclaims liability for the interception or unintentional disclosure of email transmissions.

5. External Computing Options/Licensing Representation
a. BDO would like to discuss whether, as part of the project, the City will request BDO to use third-party, external computing options or software and adding standard provisions to cover the use of such options. b. Additionally, if the services will require the use of such external computing options or software, we would request a representation from the City that it has obtained all licenses and authorizations necessary to allow BDO to access such options or software.

6. Restricted Federal Data
780
37 BDO | A Proposal to Provide Professional Services for City of Banning, CA BDO Considerations of the City’s Sample
Agreement Cont.
a. BDO would like to include a provision clarifying that the services will not involve the processing of data subject to federal laws, regulations or government-wide policies that require safeguarding or dissemination controls.

1. Other Applicable Provisions
a. BDO Responsibilities
b. Client Responsibilities
c. Consent for Disclosure
d. Intellectual Property
781
At BDO, our purpose is helping people thrive, every day. Together, we are focused on delivering exceptional and sustainable outcomes — for our people, our clients and our communities. Across the U.S., and in over 160 countries through our global organization, BDO professionals provide assurance, tax and advisory services for a diverse range of clients.

A PROPOSAL TO PROVIDE
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR:

HRS RATE
% BY
HOURS %BY COST TOTAL HRS RATE
% BY
HOURS %BY COST TOTAL | |
Partners 0.0 $265.00 0.00% $0.00 $0.00 0.0 $265.00 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! $0.00 | | Managers 180.0 $265.00 33.33% 0.340957827 $47,700.00 0.0 $265.00 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! $0.00 | | Supervisory Staff 360.0 $220.00 66.67% 0.566118656 $79,200.00 0.0 $220.00 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! $0.00 | | Staff 0.0 $200.00 0.00% 0 $0.00 0.0 $200.00 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! $0.00 | | Other 0.0 $200.00 0.00% 0 $0.00 0.0 $200.00 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! $0.00 | | SUB TOTAL 540.0 $126,900.00 0.0 $0.00 | |
Out of Pocket Expenses: $13,000.00 $0.00 | |
TOTAL BY YEAR $139,900.00 $0.00 | |
GRAND TOTAL $139,900.00 | |
BDO will be charging travel costs including airfare, hotel, meals, and rental cars. Rates will not exceed the IRS current rates.

Airfare $ 4,500
Hotel $ 6,000
Meals $ 1,500
Rental Car $ 1,000
Estimated Number of Days Onsite 10
Total $ 13,000

CITY OF BANNING FORENSIC INVESTIGATION AND ACCOUNTING SERVICES Phase 1 Phase 2 (if applicable)
Phase 1 Travel
BDO includes its hourly rates for Phase 2 (and beyond); however, an accurate cost estimate for Phase 2 costs
can only be provided at the conclusion of Phase 1, when the activities required for Phase 2 will be known.

DISCRIPTION / YEAR
COMPANY NAME > BDO USA, P.C.
2 BDO | A Proposal to Provide Professional Services for City of Banning, CA Pricing Form
784
3 BDO | A Proposal to Provide Professional Services for City of Banning, CA Fee Assumptions

ASSUMPTIONS
Our Phase 1 fee estimate is based on the following
assumptions:
 A maximum 4 months of scope for investigation
services.
 10 days of onsite work and the remainder of days
being remote work.
 Hotel, airfare, rental car and meals for 2 BDO
personnel traveling to the City of Banning.
 Key documents are provided on the dates agreed and
there are no significant delays outside of our
control.
 Your personnel prepare schedules and analyses as
requested and are available to assist us as needed.
 Prior year workpapers will be made available for our
review.
 Financial statements and supporting schedules for all entities are prepared in-house by management.
 No significant changes occur in the internal
accounting controls, accounting systems, key
personnel, or structure of the organization.
 Read-only access to the City's financial reporting and payment systems.

COST ESTIMATES/PROFESSIONAL HOURLY
RATES
For Phase 1, we have completed the excel sheet
(provided by the City) and included our total maximum
cost estimate. An accurate cost estimate for Phase 2
costs can only be provided at the conclusion of Phase
1, when the activities required for Phase 2 will be
known. Below are our standard average hourly bill
rates which will be used to price future scopes of
work (e.g, Phase 2 and beyond). We evaluate these
rates each year to take inflation and salary increases
into consideration. We do not anticipate more than an
8% annual increase.

Professional Level Hourly Rates
Principal/Director $265
Senior Manager $265
Manager $240
Senior Associate $220
Associate $200
785
At BDO, our purpose is helping people thrive, every day. Together, we are focused on delivering exceptional and sustainable outcomes — for our people, our clients and our communities. Across the U.S., and in over 160 countries through our global organization, BDO professionals provide assurance, tax and advisory services for a diverse range of clients.

CITY OF BANNING

STAFF REPORT
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Douglas Schulze, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Doug Schulze, City Manager
MEETING DATE: March 26, 2024
SUBJECT: Discussion of Council Policy Changes Regarding Extension of Meetings and Disparaging Remarks Made by Members of the City Council RECOMMENDATION:

Provide direction to the City Manager regarding changes to City Council policy.

BACKGROUND:

This discussion item has been placed on the agenda as provided for by Section 5.1 of the Manual of Procedural Guidelines, which allows any legislative body member to have placed on the agenda any business that should be deliberated upon in the future by the legislative body. The request to place this item on the agenda was originally received by the City Manager's office on Thursday, February 29 and confirmed via a telephone conversation on March 5.

During the past several months, concerns about decorum and efficient use of meeting time have been raised by members of the City Council and of the community. In addition, City Council meetings have become lengthy, which results in frustration from all involved. City Council meetings are crucial for city officials to enact ordinances, resolutions, and orders necessary for running the city effectively. The procedures followed during these meetings are essential for maximizing efficiency and ensuring that critical issues are addressed while encouraging public engagement. the purpose of a city council meeting is to provide a structured forum for city officials to make decisions, address community concerns, and engage with the public in a transparent and democratic manner.

The Manual of Procedural Guidelines for the Conduct of City Council and Constituent Body/Commission Meetings has been adopted to provide the structure for efficient and effective meetings. The Manual is adopted by resolution, establishing City Council policy. The City of Banning Manual is similar to procedural manuals enacted by other cities so, it is not unique to the City of Banning.

Consent Items - Section 6.3 of the Manual provides guidelines for the Consent Calendar. The items placed on the Consent Calendar are matters of a routine or generally uncontested nature and noncontroversial. The Consent Calendar may be approved by the City Council in a single motion. Items on the Consent Calendar, upon the request of any member of the City Council or member of the public made through the Presiding Officer, may be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate discussion and/or action. Use of the consent calendar is a commonly used agenda management technique. Some cities move all pulled consent items to the end of the agenda (Discussion Items) to avoid delaying action of other items of business. It is also common practice for members of the City Council to contact the City Manager prior to the Council meeting with questions about consent calendar items, which eliminates the need to pull items from the consent calendar and use meeting time. 787
Public Comment - Section 7.1. All cities include a "General Public Comment" opportunity during regular business meetings. The City of Banning provides an opportunity for the public to comment on any and all issues (not on the agenda) within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Legislative Body. General public comment on non-agendized issues takes placed at the beginning of the meeting and each speaker is limited to a maximum of three (3) minutes to provide comments on non-agendized issues. Some cities use speaker cards to make the public comment period more efficient. Upon arrival, members of the public may submit a speaker card to the City Clerk. The City Clerk will then provide the Mayor with the speaker cards, in order received, and speakers are called to the podium accordingly. Once all speakers who submitted speaker cards have been called, anyone who did not submit a speaker card is given an opportunity to speak. Speakers cannot be required to provide their name, address, etc. to speak, but it is a technique used for more efficient meetings. Members of the public are also provided opportunities to address the legislative body on each and every item listed on the agenda. A maximum time of five (5) minutes is provided for comments on agenda items. Again, speaker cards are an effective tool for making meetings more efficient, but cannot be a mandatory requirement.

Decorum and Order - Article X. This Article of the Manual of Procedural Guidelines provides very specific rules for meeting participation by legislative body members, city staff and members of the public.

Disruptions, distractions, rude and derogatory remarks, abusive comments and statements as to motives and personalities can quickly turn a meeting into chaos. In addition, this type of behavior can discourage members of the public from attending and/or engaging in public meetings. Furthermore, City Council meetings are frequently watched by individuals who may be considering investing in Banning and may decide to invest elsewhere rather than subject themselves or their business to similar attacks. This also applies to comments on social media or any other forum. City officials are always representatives of the City and conduct, at all times, is a reflection on the entire organization. Some cities have implemented policies whereby city officials are fined for making disparaging remarks about others.

Length of Meeting Agendas and Extension of Meetings after 10:00 p.m. - When meeting agendas are planned, the management team attempts to estimate the amount of time each item will require. However, amount of time spent on general public comments, agendized item public comments, and consent calendar items pulled for discussion is difficult to estimate. In addition, there is no correlation between the number of items on an agenda and the length of the meeting. Resolution 2016-44 was adopted by the City Council due to the large number of items and complexity of items on the agenda in 2016. The amount of activity and complexity of items has only increased since 2016 and, the City Council has not increased the frequency of meetings. Some cities meet weekly so the length of meetings remains reasonable and business is completed in a timely manner. Resolution 2016-44 imposes a 10:00 p.m. curfew upon City Council meetings. Matter taken up by the Council before 10:00 p.m. may be concluded, but no new matters shall be taken up after 10:00 p.m. except upon a unanimous vote of the council members present, but such extension shall only be valid for one hour and each hour thereafter shall require a renewed action for the meeting to continue. Consideration of amending Resolution 2016-44 to only require a majority of members present to extend a meeting has been suggested.

JUSTIFICATION:

Per Section 5.1 of the Manual of Procedural Guidelines allows any legislative body member to have placed on the agenda any business that should be deliberated upon in the future by the legislative body.

FISCAL IMPACT:

No fiscal impact.

ALTERNATIVES:

1. Provide direction to City Manager to prepare for future consideration a resolution or resolutions amending the Manual of Procedural Guidelines or Resolution 2016-44;

2. Do not provide direction to City Manager to prepare items for future consideration.

ATTACHMENTS:
788

1. CC Resolution No. 2016-044.pdf
789
RESOLUTION NO. 2016- 44

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BANNING,

CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING TIME LIMITS FOR CONDUCT OF BUSINESS AT CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS AND REPEALING RESOLUTION NO. 2010- 38 WHEREAS, the large number of matters on recent Council agendas and the complexity of such matters have led to several lengthy meetings lasting until very late hours; and
WHEREAS, this Council wishes to be able to give careful attention to and make wise decisions on matters coming before it both ofwhich goals may not be met after fatigue sets in caused by several hours of active participation in important City business; and WHEREAS, a reasonable limit upon the length of Council meetings appear for these reasons to be in the best interest of both the citizens and the City Council Members of the City ofBanning.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Banning as follows:

SECTION 1. That commencing with the first regularly scheduled Council meeting following the effective date of this resolution, a 10: 00 P. M. curfew shall be imposed upon City Council meetings. Matters taken up by the Council before 10: 00 P. M. may be concluded, but no new matters shall be taken up after 10: 00 P. M. except upon a unanimous vote of the council members present, but such extension shall only be valid for one hour and each hour thereafter shall require a renewed action for the meeting to continue.

SECTION 2. The City Manager is requested to arrange the regular order of business on Council agendas to minimize any adverse effects this policy may have with respect to the timely conduct of important City business.

SECTION 3. A copy of this resolution shall be posted in a conspicuous location and appropriate references hereto shall be made on the Council agenda in order to provide adequate notice.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 24th day of Ma , 201
ATTEST:

L/ nadeilitae
Marie A. Calderon, City Clerk
Arthur L. Welc f ayor
City ofBanning
Reso. No. 2016- 44
1 790

APPROVED AS TO FORM
AND LEGAL CONTENT:
o i
y R. ayl ity Atto
Aleshire & Wynd- , LLP
CERTIFICATION:

I, Marie A. Calderon, City Clerk of the City of Banning, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2016- 44, was duly adopted by the City Council ofthe City of Banning, California, at a regular meeting thereofheld on the 24th day of May, 2016, by the following vote, to wit:

AYES: Councilmembers Franklin, Moyer, Mayor Welch
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: Councilmember Miller
Marie A. Calderon, City Clerk
City ofBanning, California
Reso. No. 2016- 44
2 791

CITY OF BANNING

STAFF REPORT
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Douglas Schulze, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Art Vela, Public Works Director
MEETING DATE: March 26, 2024
SUBJECT: Discuss Adding a City of Banning Identifier to the San Gorgonio Avenue Overpass
RECOMMENDATION:

Discuss adding a City of Banning identifier to the San Gorgonio Avenue Overpass and provide direction to staff.

BACKGROUND:

Many City’s have begun to add architectural features including their names (“City Identifier”) on overpasses along interstates. These City Identifiers provide an opportunity for city’s to brand, create recognition and provide a positive image for existing and future residents and visitors traveling to and by their city’s, which could aid in additional economic development.

The City of Banning could add a City Identifier to the San Gorgonio overpass and enjoy those same benefits. In the limited research conducted by Public Work staff, it appears that a cost range for such an improvement could range from $500,000 to $1,500,000 depending on the design. The biggest challenge for this project would be funding. Funding sources could include grants (e.g. Clean California, etc.), finance districts (e.g. Infrastructure Finance Districts, etc.) and local funds. As of today the City does not have any funds allocated to this project.

If a majority interest exists, City Council could consider a few options:

Option #1: Do nothing.

Option #2: Direct staff to research grant opportunities and apply for grants as they become available.

Some grants may require a match, which could be funded by local funds or other sources.

Option #3: Direct staff to procure architectural services to develop several architectural renderings to choose from and to develop high level cost estimates. The results of these efforts could assist in bolstering the City’s grant applications.

The three options above are not intended to be an exhaustive list of options, but only those that would not require a large funding commitment at this time.

JUSTIFICATION:

A City Identifier on the San Gorgonio Avenue overpass could provide the City various benefits as described in this report.
792
FISCAL IMPACT:

The cost for the preparation of a grant application(s) would range from $10,000 to $25,000 depending on the requirements of the grant guidelines and level of effort.

The cost for the preparation of architectural renderings and estimates would range from $20,000 to $30,000.

ALTERNATIVES:

1. Direct to move forward with one of the options listed in this report.

2. Provide alternative direction to staff.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Identifier Examples.pdf
793
794
795
796
797

Banning City CouncilMarch 26, 2024

Banning City Council
March 26, 2024