Agenda packet, regular meeting — Banning City Council, May 12, 2026 (part 3 of 3)

580
File No.: 0.282-25

EXHIBIT B
B. National Objective
All activities funded with CDBG funds must comply with one or more ofthe CDBG program' s National Objective Criteria as required under 24 CFR 570.200( a)( 2). Sponsor certifies that the activity ( ies) carried out under this Agreement will meet the following National Objective:

National Objective Criteria: 570.208 ( a)( 2Xi)(A) --~-~-------------------- CFR Reference: Low Mod Limited Clientele Presumed
C. Levels ofAccomplishment - Goals and Performance Measures The Sponsor agrees to provide the foJlowing levels of program services:

Activity Units
per Month
Total
nits/Year
Total
Undup/ icated Persons
Activity #1 45
Unit of Service is defined as: Clients Served

CPD OUTCOME PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT
Objectives (select one): ~ Creating Suitable Living Environments 0 Providing Decent Affordable Housing
D Creating Economic Opportunities
Outcome (select one): !: gj Availability/ Accessibility D Affordability
45 D Sustainability ( promoting livable or viable communities) D. Sponsor Capacity
By executing this Sponsor' s Agreement, the Sponsor certifies that it has the appropriate number of trained and knowledgeable staff, adequate facilities, proper equipment, required licensing and pennitting, and sufficient amount offinancial resources necessary to implement and carry out the activities funded with CDBG funds.

Sponsor will immediately notify County of any significant changes in organizational management, assigned staff, change in facilities, loss or change in matching funds, or any other event that could potentially impact Sponsor' s perfonnance under this Agreement. Any changes in the above items are subject to the prior approval ofthe County.

E. Performance Monitoring
The County of Riverside Grantee will monitor the perfonnance of the Sponsor against goals and perfonnance standards as stated above. Substandard perfonnance as detennined by the County will constitute noncompliance with this Agreement. lf action to correct such substanda1- d perfonnance is not taken by the Sponsor within a reasonable period oftime after being notified by the County, contract suspension or tennination procedures wiJI be initiated.

Page 2 of 6 ends

581
File No.: 0.282-25

EXHIBIT B
F. Program Budget
Jt is expressly agreed and understood that the total amount to be paid by the County under this Agreement shall not exceed $ 90,050. Drawdowns for the payment of eligible expenses shall be made against the line item budgets specified in this Section and in accordance with perfonnance. Payments may be contingent upon certification ofthe Subrecipient' s financial management system in accordance with the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards ( 2 CFR Part 200).

The County may require a more detailed budget breakdown than the one contained herein, and the Sponsor shall provide such supplementary budget information in a timely fashion in the form and content prescribed by the County. Any amendments to the budget must be approved in writing by both the County and Sponsor.

Line Item
CDBG Granted
Funds
Total Direct Program $ 90, 050
Expenses
Salaries X
Fringe X
Office Space (Program Only) X
Utilities
Communications
Reproduction/Printing
Supplies and Materials
Mileage
Equipment (Program Only)
Audit
Transportation
Other:

Total Indirect Program $
Expenses
Indirect Costs (Specify)* X
Total NonCDBG Funds
1,965,000
Page3 of6
Total
Activity/ Project
Bud ct
2,055,050
Notes
582
File No.: 0.282- 25

EXHIBIT B
G. Total Amount of Non- CDBG Leveraging

SOURCE AMOUNT SOURCE AMOUNT SOURCE AMOUNT TOTAL
81'.ATEIEOCAl.. State/Local $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000
Boca-Victims ofCrime Ac
Cooperation/ Foundations $ 465,000 $ 465, 000
TOT AL: $ 1,965, 000
Ill. ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS
A Accounting Standards
The Sponsor agrees to comply with the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (2 CFR Part 200), and agrees to adhere to the accounting principles and procedures required therein, utilize adequate internal controls, and maintain necessary source documentation for all costs incurred.

B. Cost Principles
The Sponsor shall administer its program in confonnance with the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (2 CFR Part 200). These principles shall be applied for all costs incurred whether charged on a direct or indirect basis.

C. Documentation and Record Keeping

1. Records to be Maintained
The Subrecipient shall maintain all records required by the Federal regulations specified in 24 CFR 570.506, that are pertinent to the activities to be funded under this Agreement. Such records shall include but not be limited to:

Records providing a full description of each activity undertaken; ii. Records demonstrating that each activity undertaken meets one ofthe National Objectives ofthe CDBG program;
iii. Records required to determine the eligibility ofactivities; iv. Records required to document the acquisition. improvement, use or disposition of real property acquired or improved with CDBG assistance;
v. Records documenting compliance with the fair housing and equal opportunity components ofthe CDBG program;
vi. Financial records as required by 24 CFR 570.502, and 2 CFR 200; and vii. Other records necessary to document compliance with Subpart K of24 CFR Part 570.

Page 4 ends

583

2. Records Retention:

EXHIBIT A
File No.: 5.BN.65- 25
The City shall retain alJ CDBG-related financial records, supporting documents, contracts, and agreements for a period of four (4) years. The retention period begins on the date of the submission of the County' s annual performance and evaluation report to HUD in which the activities assisted under the Agreement are reported for the final time. The City will retain all National Objective documentation, including lowmoderate income certification, ethnicity, and other pertinent data for a period of four ( 4) years after submission ofthe County' s annual performance and evaluation report to HUD. Notwithstanding the above, ifthere is litigation, claims, audits, negotiations or other actions that involve any ofthe records cited and that have started before the expiration of the four-year period, then such records must be retained until completion ofthe actions and resolution ofall issues.

3. Client Data:

The City shall maintain client data demonstrating client eligibility for services provided. Such data shall include, but not be limited to, client name, address, income level or other basis for determining eligibility, and description of service provided. Such information shall be made available to County monitors or their designees for review upon request.

4. Disclosure:

The City understands that client infonnation collected under this contract is private and the use or disclosure of such infonnation, when not directly connected with the administration of the County' s or City' s responsibilities with respect to services provided under this contract, is prohibited by applicable federal and State law unless written consent is obtained from such person receiving service and. in the case ofa minor, that ofa responsible parent/ guardian.

5. Close- outs:

The City' s obligation to the County shall not end until all close-out requirements are completed. Activities during this close- out period shall include, but are not limited to: making final payments, disposing of program assets ( including the return of all unused materials, equipment, unspent cash advances, program income balances, and accounts receivable to the County), and detennining the custodianship of records.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, the tenns of this Agreement shall remain in effect during any period that the City has contTol over CDBG funds, including program income.

6. Audits & Inspections:

All City records with respect to any matters covered by this Agreement shall be made available to the County, HUD, and the Controller General ofthe United States or any oftheir authorized representatives, at any time during normal business hours, as often as deemed necessary, to audit, examine, and make excerpts or transcripts ofall relevant data. Any deficiencies noted in audit reports must be fully cleared by the City within 30 days after receipt by the City. Failure of the City to comply with the above audit requirements will constitute a violation of this contract and may result in the withholding of future payments. The City hereby agrees to have an annual agency audit conducted in accordance with current County policy concerning subrecipient audits, the Single Audit Act, and the Office of Management and Budget ( 0MB) Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations ( CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Costs Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards ( Uniform Guidance).

Pages of6
584

EXHIBIT A
File No.: 5.BN.65~25
IV. PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION AND SCHEDULE
Unless pre- approved by County, CITY will perform and complete the activities described in Section II in conformance with the schedule oftasks and milestones listed below:

Tasks / Milestone
Complete CDBG Training
Implement Program Activities
Execute Supplemental Agreement
Notice to Incur Cost
City Submits Quarterly
Perfonnance Reports to County
County Monitoring ofCity
Perfonnance
City Submits Monthly
Direct Benefit Reports
City Submits Reimbursement
Requests
Start Date
September 2025
July I, 2025 1
September 2025
October 2025
TBD
October 2025
October 2025
Completion Date
September 2025
January 2026
March 27, 2026 2
TBD
March 27, 2026 ~
March 27, 2026 4
The Notice to Incur Cost Letter will provide the specific program implementation date for this CDBG- funded activity.

2. 3, 4 Submittal of required documentation is detennined by the specific benefit period of the CDBGfunded activity. Confinn performance requirements with CDBG Program Manager.

CDBG Program Services Complete June 30, 2026
V. SPEf JAL CO:\ DffJONS /PERFOR1\ 1ANCE REQllHU: ME' JTS Sponsor must collect Self-Certifications with supporting income documents and demographic infonnation from EVERY individual or family participating in CDBG-funded activities or the parent/legal guardian ofevery child participating in CDBG-funded activities. This includes family income, family size, and race. Sponsor is required to submit the I
st 200 Self- Certifications fonns with supporting income documentation and 25% thereafter to HWS along with the Direct Benefit Reports on a monthly basis unless otherwise authorized in writing by CDBG program staff.

Once the Notice to Incur Cost letter is received, City must submit monthly reimbursement requests unless another schedule is approved, in writing, by HWS. Further, at least 75% of all 2025- 26 CDBG funds must be drawn down by January 12, 2026, and 100% of all 2025-26 CDBG funds must be drawn down by March 27, 2026.

Page 6 ends

585

EXHIBITC

SPONSOR' S AGREEMENT

SCOPE OF WORK

PUBLIC SERVICE)
I. GENERAL INFORMATION
File No.: 0.284-25
I SPONSOR NAME: Boys & Girls Clubs ofthe San Gorgonio Pass UEI #: CM9MN3YNAKJ8 IADDRESS: PO Box 655
Beaumont, CA 92223
I PROGRAM CONTACTS: Megan Grisham, Program Manager
j PHONE: (951 )692-3259 FAX: ( 951) 922-0009
I E-MAIL: bgcmegan@yahoo. com
I PROJECT NAME: Teens Continue to Lead
IPROJECT LOCATION: 240 W. Ramsey Street, Banning, CA 92220 LEVEL OF ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE: EXEMPT (24 CFR 58.34 (a)(4)J CDBG ELIGIBILITY CODE: 24 CFR 570.201 ( e) Public Services PROJECT FUNDING SUMMARY: $ 8,850
5th District $ 5,000
City ofBanning $ 3,850
II. SCOPE OF SERVICE
A. Activities
Sponsor will be responsible for administering a 2025-2026 Community Development Block Grant for the Teens Continue to Lead in a manner satisfactory to the County of Riverside and consistent with any standards required as a condition of providing these funds. Such program will include the following activities eligible under the Community Development Block Grant program:

Activity #1 The Boys and Girls Club ofSan Gorgonio Pass offers a teen program for ages 13-18 during summer and school breaks. The Teens Continue to Lead program offers mentorship and courses in character and leadership, the arts, health and life skills, education, technology, and sports and recreation. CDBG funds will be used for staff salaries ( direct cost), consumable supplies, and other program- related expenses.

Page I of6
586
File No.: 0.284- 25

EXHIBITC
B. National Objective
All activities funded with CDBG funds must comply with one or more ofthe CDBG program' s National Objective Criteria as required under 24 CFR 570.200( a)( 2). Sponsor certifies that the activity ( ies) carried out under this Agreement will meet the following National Objective:

National Objective Criteria: 570.208 ( a)( 2)(i)(B) ----------------"------------------------ CFR Reference: Low Mod Limited Clientele Income Certification C. Levels ofAccomplishment- Goals and Performance Measures The Sponsor agrees to provide the following levels of program services:

Activity
Activity #1
Units
per Month
Unit of Service is defined as: Teens Served
Total
Units/Year
JO

CPD OUTCOME PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT
Total
Unduplicated Persons
10 Objectives (select one): 1Z1 Creating Suitable Living Environments D Providing Decent Affordable Housing
D Creating Economic Opportunities
Outcome (select one): IZJ Availability/ Accessibility
0 Affordability
D Sustainability ( promoting livable or viable communities) D. Sponsor Capacity
By executing this Sponsor' s Agreement, the Sponsor certifies that it has the appropriate number of trained and knowledgeable staff, adequate facilities, proper equipment, required licensing and permitting, and sufficient amount of financial resources necessary to implement and carry out the activities funded with CDBG funds.

Sponsor will immediately notify County of any significant changes in organizational management, assigned staff, change in facilities, loss or change in matching funds, or any other event that could potentially impact Sponsor' s performance under this Agreement. Any changes in the above items are subject to the prior approval ofthe County.

E. Performance Monitoring
The County of Riverside Grantee will monitor the performance of the Sponsor against goals and performance standards as stated above. Substandard perfonnance as detennined by the County will constitute noncompliance with this Agreement. If action to correct such substandard perfonnance is not taken by the Sponsor within a reasonable period oftime after being notified by the County, contract suspension or termination procedures will be initiated.

Page 2 ends

587
File No.: 0.284-25

EXHIBITC
F. Program Budget
It is expressly agreed and understood that the total amount to be paid by the County under this Agreement shall not exceed $ 8,850. Drawdowns for the payment of eligible expenses shall be made against the line item budgets specified in this Section and in accordance with performance. Payments may be contingent upon certification ofthe Subrecipient' s financial management system in accordance with the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards ( 2 CFR Part 200).

The County may require a more detailed budget breakdown than the one contained herein, and the Sponsor shall provide such supplemental)' budget infonnation in a timely fashion in the fonn and content prescribed by the County. Any amendments to the budget must be approved in writing by both the County and Sponsor.

Line Item
CDBG Granted
Funds
Total Direct Program $ 8,850
Expenses
Salaries X
Fringe X
Office Space ( Program Only)
Utilities
Communications
Reproduction/ Printing
Supplies and Materials X
Mileage
Equipment ( Program Only)
Audit
Transportation
Other: ro • ram related ex enscs X
Total Indirect Program $
Expenses
Indirect Costs ( Specify)*
Total NooCDBG Funds
37, 500

Page 3 ends

Total
Activity/ Project
Notes
Budget""" " ""-+···""""····•·""""·""·"·""···-••··- i
46, 350
588
File No.: 0.284- 25

EXHIBITC
G. Total Amount of Non- CDBG Leveraging
TYPE
FEDERAL·

AMOUNT SOURCE
I0,000

AMOUNT SOURCE AMOUNT TOTAL

STATE/ LOCAL
SOURCE
OJP
ELOP $ 15,000
10,000
15,000
PRIVATE 5,000
OTHER
SCE
Spearman
Foundation
5,000
7,500 $ 7,500
TOTAL: $ 37, 500
III. ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS
A. Accounting Standards
The Sponsor agrees to comply with the Unifonn Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (2 CFR Part 200), and agrees to adhere to the accounting principles and procedures required therein, utilize adequate internal controls, and maintain necessary source documentation for all costs incurred.

B. Cost Principles
The Sponsor shall administer its program in conformance with the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (2 CFR Part 200). These principles shall be applied for all costs incurred whether charged on a direct or indirect basis.

C. Documentation and Record Keeping
I. Records to be Maintained
The Subrecipient shall maintain all records required by the Federal regulations specified in 24 CFR 570.506, that are pertinent to the activities to be funded under this Agreement. Such records shall include but not be limited to:

Records providing a full description ofeach activity widertaken; ii. Records demonstrating that each activity undertaken meets one ofthe National Objectives ofthe CDBG program;
iii. Records required to determine the eligibility ofactivities; iv. Records required to document the acquisition, improvement, use or disposition of real property acquired or improved with CDBG assistance;
v. Records documenting compliance with the fair housing and equal opportunity components ofthe CDBG program~
vi. Financial records as required by 24 CFR 570.502, and 2 CFR 200; and vii. Other records necessary to document compliance with Subpart K of24 CFR Part 570.

Page 4 ends

589
File No.: 0.284-25

EXHIBITC

2. Records Retention
The Sponsor shall retain all financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other records pertinent to the Agreement for a period of four (4) years. The retention period begins on the date of the submission of the County's annual perfonnance and evaluation report to HUD in which the activities assisted under the Agreement are reported on for the final time. Notwithstanding the above, ifthere is litigation, claims, audits, negotiations or other actions that involve any of the records cited and that have started before the expiration ofthe four-year period, then such records must be retained until completion of the actions and resolution ofall issues, or the expiration ofthe four-year period, whichever occurs later.

3. Client Data
The Sponsor shall maintain client data demonstrating client eligibility for services provided. Such data shall include, but not be limited to, client name, address, income level or other basis for detennining eligibility, and description of service provided. Such infonnation shall be made available to County monitors or their designees for review upon request.

4. Disclosure
The Sponsor understands that client infonnation collected under this contract is private and the use or disclosure of such information, when not directly connected with the administration of the County's or Sponsor' s responsibilities with respect to services provided under this contract, is prohibited by applicable federal and State law unless written consent is obtained from such person receiving service and. in the case of a minor, that of a responsible parent/guardian.

5. Close- outs
The Sponsor' s obligation to the County shall not end until all close-out requirements are completed.

Activities during this close-out period shall include, but are not limited to: making final payments, disposing ofprogram assets (including the return ofall unused materials, equipment, unspent cash advances, program income balances, and accounts receivable to the County), and determining the custodianship of records. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the terms ofthis Agreement shall remain in effect during any period that the Sponsor has control over CDBG funds, including program income.

6. Audits & Inspections
All Sponsor records with respect to any matters covered by this Agreement shall be made available to the County, HUD, and the Controller General ofthe United States or any oftheir authorized representatives, at any time during normal business hours, as often as deemed necessary, to audit, examine, and make excerpts or transcripts of all relevant data. Any deficiencies noted in audit reports must be fully cleared by the Sponsor within 30 days after receipt by the Sponsor. Failure ofthe Sponsor to comply with the above audit requirements will constitute a violation of this contract and may result in the withholding of future payments. The Sponsor hereby agrees to have an annual agency audit conducted in accordance with current County policy concerning subrecipient audits, the Single Audit Act, and the Office of Management and Budget ( 0MB) Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations ( CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements. Costs Principles, and Audit Requirements for federal Awards (Uniform Guidance)

Page 5 ends

590
File No.: 0.284-25

EXHIBIT C
IV. PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION AND SCHEDULE
Unless pre-approved by County, Sponsor will perform and complete the activities described in Section II in conformance with the schedule oftasks and milestones listed below:

Tasks/ Milestone Start Date Completion Date
Complete Sponsor Training September 2025 September 2025 Implement Program Activities July I, 2025 ------------------ Execute Sponsor' s Agreement September 2025 December 2025 Notice to Incur Cost 1
Sponsor Submits Quarterly October 2025 March 27, 20262
Performance Reports to County
Sponsor Submits Monthly October 2025 March 27, 2026 3
Direct Benefit Reports
Sponsor Submits Reimbursement October 2025 March 27, 20264 Requests
The Notice to Incur Cost Letter will provide the specific program implementation date for this CDBG-funded activity.
2•3 •4 Submittal ofrequired documentation is determined by the specific benefit period ofthe CDBG-funded activity. Confirm performance requirements with CDBG Program Manager.

CDBG Program Services Complete June 30, 2026
V. SPECIAL CONDITIONS /PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS
Sponsor must collect Self-Certifications with supporting income documentation and demographic information from EVERY parent orlegal guardian ofevery child participating in CDBG-funded activities. This includes family income. family size, and race. Sponsor is required to submit the 151 200 Self- Certifications forms with supporting income documentation and 25% thereafter to HWS along with the Direct Benefit Reports on a monthly basis unless otherwise authorized in writing by CDBG program staff.

Once the Notice to Incur Cost letter is received, sponsor must submit monthly reimbursement requests unless another schedule is approved, in writing, by HWS. Further, at least 75% ofall 2025-26 CDBG funds must be drawn down by January 12, 2026, and 100% ofall 2025-26 CDBG funds must be drawn down by March 27, 2026.

Page 6 of 6 ends

591

SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT

SCOPE OF WORK

NON- PUBLIC SERVICE)
I. GENERAL INFORMATION

EXHIBIT D
File No.: 5.BN. 64-25
CITY NAME: Cit;y ofBanning UEI #: F996EVLCRCG3
ADDRESS: PO Box998
Banning, CA 92220
PROGRAM CONTACTS: Ralph Wright, Parks and Recreation Director PHONE: 9519223241 FAX:

E-MAIL: rwright@banningca. gov
PROJECT NAME: Banning Senior Center ADA Improvements Phase 11 PROJECT LOCATION: 789 N. San Gorgonio, Banning, CA 92220 LEVEL OF ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE:

CDBG ELIGIBILITY CODE: 570.201 ( c) ---"--------------------- PROJECT FUNDING SUMMARY: $ 141,828
Project to be administered by County ( HWS) on behalf of City: YES D NO ~ II. SCOPE OF SERVICE
A. Activities
City will be responsible for administering a 2025-2026 Community Development Block Grant for the Banning Senior Center ADA Improvements Phase II in a manner satisfactory to the County of Riverside and consistent with any standards required as a condition of providing these funds.

Such program will include the following activities eligible under the Community Development Block Grant program:

Activity # 1 The City ofBanning will u.<,e CDBG funding/ or ADA improvements to the Banning Senior Center, all outlined in their CASp Report. Eligible CDBG expenses will include design, construction, inspections, project management, compliance, monitoring, and other related costs. Banning Senior Center ADA Improvements Phase II B. National Objective

Page 1 ends

592

EXHIBIT D
File No.: 5.BN. 64- 25
All activities funded with CDBG funds must comply with one of more ofthe CDBG program' s National Objective Criteria as required under 24 CFR 570.200(a)(2). City certifies that the activity(ies) carried out under this Agreement will meet the following National Objective:

National Objective Criteria: _5_7_0_.2_0_8_,(~a) .... ( 2_.)(~i~)(,,_A ..... ) _____________ _ CFR Reference: Low Mod Limited Clientele Presumed
C. Levels ofAccomplishment - Goals and Performance Measures The City agrees to implement and complete the following activity(ies):

Activity #I Construct ADA Improvements to Banning Senior Center Activity #2 Complete Design, inspections, project management compliance, and monitoring

CPD OUTCOME PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT
Objectives (select one): 18.J Creating Suitable Living Environments D Providing Decent Affordable Housing
D Creating Economic Opportunities
Outcome (select one): 18,l Availability/Accessibility
D Affordability
D Sustainability ( promoting livable or viable communities) D. City Capacity
By executing this Supplemental Agreement, the City certifies that it has the appropriate number of trained and knowledgeable staff, adequate facilities, proper equipment, required licensing and pennitting, and sufficient amount of financial resources necessary to implement and cany out the activities funded with CDBGfunds.

City will immediately notify County ofany significant changes in organizational management, assigned staff, change in facilities, loss or change in matching funds, or any other event that could potentially impact the City or subrecipient' s performance under this Agreement.

Any changes in the above items are subject to the prior approval ofthe County.

E. Performance Monitoring
The County ofRiverside will monitor the performance ofthe City and its subrecipients against goals and performance standards as stated above. Substandard performance as determined by the County will constitute noncompliance with this Agreement. If action to correct such substandard performance is not taken by the City within a reasonable period oftime after being notified by the County, contract suspension or termination procedures will be initiated.

Page 2 ends

593

EXHIBIT D
File No.: 5.BN.64-25
F. Program Budget
It is expressly agreed and understood that the total amount to be paid by the County under this At:,-reement shall not exceed $141,828 Drawdowns for the payment ofeligible expenses shall be made against the line item budgets specified in this Section and in accordance with perfonnance. Payments may be contingent upon certification of the Subrecipient' s financial management system in accordance with the Unifonn Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (2 CFR Part 200).

The County may require a more detailed budget breakdown than the one contained herein, and the City shall provide such supplementary budget infonnation in a timely fashion in the fonn and content prescribed by the County. Any amendments to the budget must be approved in writing by both the County and City.

Line Item
Design/ Engineering Costs
Project Administration Costs
Construction Costs
Acquisition Costs
Relocations Costs
Capital Equipment Costs
Code Enforcement
Clearance
Interim Assistance
Indirect Costs: project related
CDBG Granted
Fonds
X
X
X
X
Total of NonCDBG Funds
8,000

Page 3 ends

Total Activity/ Project
Budget
149, 828
Notes
594
G. Total Amount of Non- CDBG Leveraging

EXHIBIT D
File No.: 5.BN. 64- 25
TYPE

FEDERAL

SOURCE AMOUNT SOURCE AMOUNT SOURCE AMOUNT
STATFJLOCAL City Funds $ 8,000

PRIVATE
OTHER
TOTAL: __ $._8 .... , o..... o __ o _
III. ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS
A. Accounting Standards
1l1e City agrees to comply with the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards ( 2 CFR Part 200) and agrees to adhere to the accounting principles and procedures required therein, utilize adequate internal controls, and maintain necessary source documentation for all costs incurred.

B. Cost Principles
The City shall administer its program in conformance with the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards ( 2 CFR Part 200).

These principles shall be applied for all costs incurred whether charged on a direct or indirect basis.

C. Documentation and Record Keeping
I. Records to be Maintained
The Subrecipient shall maintain all records required by the Federal regulations specified in 24 CFR 570.506 that are pertinent to the activities to be funded under this Agreement. Such records shall include but not be limited to:

Records providing a full description of each activity undertaken; ii. Records demonstrating that each activity undertaken meets one of the National Objectives of the CDBG program;
iii. Records required to determine the eligibility ofactivities; iv. Records required to document the acquisition, improvement, use or disposition of real property acquired or improved with CDBG assistance;
v. Records documenting compliance with the fair housing and equal opportunity components of the CDBG program;
vi. Financial records as required by 24 CFR 570.502, and 2 CFR 200; and vii. Other records necessary to document compliance with Subpart K of24 CFR Part 570.

Page 4 ends

TOTAL
8,000
595

EXHIBIT D
File No.: 5.BN. 64- 25

2. Records Retention
The City shall retain all CDBG-related financial records, supporting documents, contracts, and agreements for a period offour (4) years. The retention period begins on the date ofthe submission of the County' s annual performance and evaluation report to HUD in which the activities assisted under the Agreement are reported for the final time. The City will retain all National Objective documentation, including low-moderate income certification, ethnicity, and other pertinent data for a period offour (4) years after submission of the County's annual perfonnance and evaluation report to HUD.

Notwithstanding the above, ifthere is litigation, claims, audits, negotiations or other actions that involve any of the records cited and that have started before the expiration of the four-year period, then such records must be retained until completion ofthe actions and resolution ofall issues.

3. Client Data
The City shall maintain client data demonstrating client eligibility for services provided. Such data shall include, but not be limited to, client name, address, income level or other basis for determining eligibility, and description of service provided. Such information shall be made available to County monitors or their designees for review upon request.

4. Disclosure
The City understands that client infonnation collected under this contract is private and the use or disclosure of such information, when not directly connected with the administration ofthe County's or City's responsibilities with respect to services provided under this contract, is prohibited by applicable federal and State law unless written consent is obtained from such person receiving service and, in the case ofa minor, that ofa responsible parent/guardian.

5. Close~outs
The City's obligation to the County shall not end until all close-out requirements are completed.

Activities during this close-out period shall include, but are not limited to: making final payments, disposing of program assets ( including the return of all unused materials, equipment, unspent cash advances, program income balances, and accounts receivable to the County), and detennining the custodianship ofrecords. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the terms of this Agreement shall remain in effect during any period that the City has control over CDBG funds, including program income.

6. Audits & Inspections
All City records with respect to any matters covered by this Agreement shall be made available to the County, HUD, and the Controller General ofthe United States or any oftheir authorized representatives, at any time during normal business hours, as often as deemed necessary, to audit, examine, and make excerpts or transcripts ofall relevant data. Any deficiencies noted in audit reports must be fully cleared by the City within 30 days after receipt by the City. Failure ofthe City to comply with the above audit requirements will constitute a violation of this contract and may result in the withholding of future payments. The City hereby agrees to have an annual agency audit conducted in accordance with current County policy concerning subrecipient audits the Single Audit Act, and the Office of Management and Budget ( 0MB) Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations ( CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Costs Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance).

Page 5 ends

596

EXHIBIT D
File No.: S.BN. 64- 25
IV. PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION AND SCHEDULE
Unless pre-approved by County, City will perform and complete the activities described in Section II in conformance with the schedule oftasks and milestones listed below:

Tasks / Milestone Start Date
September 2025
Completion Date
Complete CDBG Training September 2025
Implement Project Activities
Execute Supplemental Agreement
Notice to Incur Cost
Upon Notification from HWS
September 2025 January 2026
Tasks / Milestone Start Date Completion Date
Submit Quarterly Performance Reports to County October 2025 Through June 2027 County Monitoring ofCity Program/Performance To be detennined by Program Manager Specific Proiect Activities

1. City executes Supplemental Agreement; receives Authorization to Incur Cost letter

2. City prepares final construction documents (incorporating Special Federal Provisions) for HWS review and approval

3. HWS authorizes City to advertise for bids

4. HWS reviews and approves bidding process

5. City awards construction contract

6. City and HWS conduct " pre-construction meeting"

7. HWS authorizes City to issue " Notice to Proceed"
City Submits Reimbursement Requests
Monthly Submittal 0
Other Schedule 12'.1 To be determined by Program Manage_r ______ _ CDBG-funded Project Complete June 30, 2027
V. SPECIAL CONDITIONS / PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS
City must follow proper procurement and construction policies and procedures of the City and CDBG regulations. No construction will shall commence using CDBG funding without prior Notice to Proceed.

Pre-Construction meeting required. City is required to contact the County Program Manager for review prior to submission of RFP, construction activity or cost without prior written approval. County must be contacted 10 days in advance for attendance ofPre-Construction meeting. Original Certified payrolls to be submitted on a weekly basis to County.

This public facility project meets a National Objective ofthe CDBG program by primarily serving, severely disabled adults that are presumed to have low and moderate incomes. Upon project completion, City/Sponsor must continue collecting eligibility Self-Certifications and report annual Direct Benefit data income limit categories and race infonnation) to HWS for five (5) years.

Page 6 ends

597
From: Varona-Doromal, Anna
To: Ralph Wright
Subject: Follow- up on the FY24-25 CDBG Projects
Date: Wednesday, May 6, 2026 8:04:45 AM
Attachments: image001.png
image002.png
IDIS flag list_Dysart.pdf
Banning Signed Agreement.pdf
Good morning, Ralph,
Per our conversation on Monday, I would like to outline again the options we have to remediate this project. As you can see by the print-out from the HUD reporting stystem (IDIS), the Dysart Park Project is flagged as at-risk and had a due date of remediation of 4.27.2026. I have delayed my remediation because I was hoping to have a resolution from the City by now.

As it stands, this project is out of compliance per the agreement with the County and with our agreements with HUD. In order to get back into compliance, we need to have a valid explanation for the delay, as well as, a plan of how we are going to remediate this issue.

The options to do this are as follows, but must be acted out swiftly as to not put the overall program on the radar and at risk.

1. The city can provide a letter requesting to extend the project in its current form/description and we will move to start the process to restate the FY24-25 Supplemental Agreement for Dysart Park. This would indicate the city intends to move forward to complete the design with CDBG and has its own funds to complete the actual project within the year extension period. Using CDBG funds for design only cannot be completed successfully until the project is completed.

2. The City can cancel this project and reprogram funds into a current viable project for FY25-26.

3. The City can cancel the FY24-25 project and we can hold the funding earmarking it for an application that the city would submit for Dysart Park. The easiest thing would be to add a project with these funds for FY26-27 after the overall FY26-27 plan has been approved by HUD.

I understand that the city is intending to use this funding for a Dysart Park Project, which I am keeping record of. To do this, the city has to have a plan for what they want to complete and have a plan to complete a project at Dysart within the time frames indicated in the supplemental agreement.

We need a decision on this quickly as we cannot move on an expired agreement. I have attached the agreement above for your reference.

Thank you,
Anna Varona-Doromal
Supervising Development Specialist|Community and Housing Development County of Riverside|Housing and Workforce Solutions
3403 10th St., Suite 300|Riverside, CA 92501
Office: 951.955.1113
Confidentiality Disclaimer
This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure.

If you are not the author's intended recipient, be advised that you have received this email in error and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of this email is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error please delete all copies, both electronic and printed, and contact the author immediately.

County of Riverside California
598

CITY OF BANNING

STAFF REPORT
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Elizabeth Gibbs, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Holly Stuart, Public Works Program Manager Arturo Vela, Director of Public Works
MEETING DATE: May 12, 2026
SUBJECT: Make a Determination of Exemption Under the California Environmental Quality Act and Consideration of Resolution 2026-69, Establishing Fiscal Year 2026/2027 Rates for Residential and Commercial Garbage, Recyclable and Organic Waste Collection.

RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt Resolution 2026-69
BACKGROUND:

On April 27, 2021, the City Council approved a solid waste franchise agreement (“Franchise Agreement”) with Waste Management of the Inland Empire (“Waste Management”) for Residential and Commercial Garbage, Recyclable Materials and Organics Waste Collection, Transportation, Recycling and Disposal Services (“Solid Waste Services”), effective July 1, 2021. The Franchise Agreement established many Solid Waste Services provided to the community designed to ensure that the City complies with State solid waste regulations. The term of the Franchise Agreement is valid through June 30, 2041.

As part of adopting the new Franchise Agreement, the City Council established the initial rates (“Rates”) for the City’s monthly service charge (“Service Charge”) for Solid Waste Services following a noticed public hearing conducted in accordance with Proposition (“Prop”) 218 on June 22, 2021. The Rate components that make up the monthly Service Charge for Solid Waste Services include the following: 1) the SB 1383 Residential Component (for residential customers only), 2) Service Component; 3) Disposal Component; 4) Organics Waste Processing Component (“Organics Component”); and 5) Recycling Processing Component (“Recycling Component”).

Since the adoption of the Franchise Agreement, rates have been adjusted annually pursuant to the Franchise Agreement and approved Prop 218 noticing. Most recently, a Prop 218 process was conducted and adopted by City Council at a Public Hearing on April 11, 2023 and is valid through July 1, 2027. As identified by this Prop 218 process and as outlined in the Franchise Agreement, the Service Component, Disposal Component, Organics Component, and Recycling Component can be adjusted annually to account for inflation and changes in disposal and processing fees as follows:

Pursuant to Section 4.03 of the Franchise Agreement, annual rate adjustments are calculated using a defined methodology based on changes in the CPI and applicable disposal and processing costs. These adjustments are not automatic; rather, Waste Management is required to submit the annual calculation to the City for review and verification. Following verification, City Council approval is required for the adjusted rates to become effective consistent with Article XIIID of the California Constitution (Prop 218) 599
and Section 2.05 of the Franchise Agreement.

The annual adjustment will be at least one percent (1.00%) (the “Floor”) and cannot exceed four percent (4.00%) (the “Cap”). If the annual CPI adjustment exceeds the Cap or is less than the Floor, then the amount above the Cap or below the Floor shall be carried over into any succeeding year until such time as it may be applied without violating the Cap or Floor limits.

The Disposal, Organics, and Recycling Components shall be adjusted for changes in tipping fees or processing fees, as applicable, charged at the disposal, recycling processing, or organic processing facilities used by Waste Management as follows:

A. If Waste Management or its affiliates own and/or operate the facility, and the tipping/processing fee is not set or adjusted by a public agency, then applicable Component (Disposal, Organics, or Recycling) shall be adjusted using the same methodology described above for adjusting the Service Component and be subject to the same Floor and Cap provisions.

B. In all other circumstances (e.g., Waste Management uses a facility owned by a third party or public agency), the applicable Component (Disposal, Organics, or Recycling) shall be adjusted using the actual change in the per ton tip fee or per ton processing fee charged at the disposal, organic waste processing facility, or recyclable processing facility, as applicable, between the previous year and the prior previous year. If Waste Management uses multiple facilities that have different per ton tip/processing fees, the City shall determine the change in the per ton tip/processing fee charged between the previous year and the prior previous year for each applicable facility and multiply this amount by the percentage of the total tonnage delivered to the facility. The City shall then add these sums together to determine the total change in the per ton tip/processing fees for each Component (Disposal, Organics, or Recycling).

As an administrative update, Exhibit 9 (Approved Facilities) of the City’s Solid Waste Franchise Agreement has been updated to reflect the current list of disposal, recycling and organics processing facilities authorized for use under the Franchise Agreement. These updates ensure that the facilities shown accurately match those currently permitted, operating and receiving material from the City including landfill, transfer, recycling, green waste and organic waste processing locations and are updated to address the following: 1) changes in available or permitted facilities; 2) adjustment in the hauler’s operational routing; 3) compliance with State mandates such as SB 1383 requiring specific organics processing capacity; or 4) the need to add or remove facilities when an approved facility is no longer available, reaches capacity or under regulatory changes.

JUSTIFICATION:

Under Section 4.03 of the Franchise Agreement, Waste Management is entitled to request an annual rate adjustment calculated in accordance with the prescribed methodology. The City’s responsibility is to review and verify the accuracy of the submitted calculations. Upon verification, the adjusted rates are presented to City Council for approval which constitutes an amendment to the Schedule of Services Rates under the Agreement. As permitted by the Franchise Agreement, Waste Management requested an annual rate adjustment for Fiscal Year 2026/2027 (July 1, 2026 - June 30, 2027), as shown in the attached letter.

Based on the methodology of the Franchise Agreement and the Prop 218 approval mentioned above, staff evaluated each Rate Component to determine applicable adjustments. The Service Component is indexed to the Consumer Price Index (CPI, subject to 1% floor and 4% annual cap). For the current 600
period, CPI increased by 3.28%. In addition, previously unutilized (e.g. carry forward) CPI totaling 3.96% was available for application. A portion of this balance has been applied to reach the maximum allowable adjustment of 4% for the period.

Following this adjustment, a remaining CPI balance of 3.24% will be carried forward and may be applied in future years so long as application falls within the approved parameters. Consistent with this approach, carryforward balances have been used from FY 2023-2024 through FY 2026-2027 to achieve the full allowable adjustment in applicable years, resulting in the current cumulative balance of 3.24% for future use.

The Recycling Component will also be adjusted by the CPI since Waste Management owns and operates the facility used for processing this material. Accordingly, this component is adjusted using the same methodology applied to the Service Component and is subject to the same Floor and Cap provisions.

For the Disposal Component, it was determined that Waste Management uses a facility owned by a third-party/public agency and that the component will be adjusted using the actual change in the per ton processing fee charged at the disposal facility between the previous year and the prior previous year.

The percentage change for this component is 1.44%.

For the Organics Component, it was determined that Waste Management used facilities owned by a third-party/public agency and that the component will be adjusted using the actual change in the per ton processing fee charged at the disposal facility between the previous year and the prior previous year.

The percentage change for this component is 0.80%.

The City Council may use the rate adjustment methodology approved pursuant to Resolution 2023-63 to establish the Rates for a five-year period through July 1, 2027 without undertaking a new Prop 218 process.

While City Council approval is required for any rate adjustment to take effect, the Franchise Agreement obligates the City to implement the annual rate adjustment methodology as negotiated. If the City Council were to deny or modify the adjustment that has been calculated in accordance with Section 4.03, the City may be required to enter into a negotiation period with Waste Management with the remedy being a reduction in service programs or termination of the agreement with termination taking effect no earlier than 18 months.

CEQA:

Staff has evaluated the adoption of the rates for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and determined that the action is covered by the common sense exemption. It can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility the adoption of the rates will have a significant effect on the environment. This is because the rates only address the cost of existing public services and do not involve the creation of any new services or programs. Accordingly, staff recommends that the City Council find that the adoption of this Resolution is exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3).

FISCAL IMPACT:

Approval of the proposed rates ensures compliance with the Franchise Agreement and avoids potential financial exposure associated with under-recovery of Waste Management’s costs.

The current Residential Rate for the collection of refuse is $31.62 per month per household and the rate will increase to $32.64, a difference of $1.02 or 3.23%. The Commercial Rate will be adjusted in accordance with the rate adjustment methodology, as shown in the attached Residential and Commercial Rate schedule, attached hereto. The new rate schedule will be effective July 1, 2026 for 601
Fiscal Year 2026/2027.

Denial of the proposed rate adjustment may result in future impacts to the City including potential contractual claims, extraordinary rate adjustment requests and increased administrative or legal costs.

Delayed implementation may also lead to higher future rate increases.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution_2026-69.docx

2. Banning FA EXHIBIT 9_4.17.26 updated.pdf

3. WM_26-27_RateAdjustmentLetter.pdf

4. Rate Survey.pdf

5. Proposed Rate Schedule Effective 7.1.26.pdf
602
Resolution 2026-69

Page 1 of 5 ends

RESOLUTION 2026-69

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BANNING, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING FISCAL YEAR 2026/2027 RATES FOR RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL

GARBAGE, RECYCLABLE MATERIALS AND ORGANICS WASTE COLLECTION,

TRANSPORTATION, DISPOSAL AND RECYCLING SERVICES, AND MAKING A FINDING OF

EXEMPTION UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT WHEREAS, on April 27, 2021, the City Council approved a new solid waste franchise agreement (“Franchise Agreement”) with Waste Management of the Inland Empire (“Waste Management”) for Residential and Commercial Garbage, Recyclable Materials and Organics Waste Collection, Transportation, Recycling and Disposal Services (“Solid Waste Services”), effective July 1, 2021; and
WHEREAS, as part of adopting the new Franchise Agreement, the City Council established the initial rates (“Rates”) for the City’s monthly service charge (“Service Charge”) for Solid Waste Services following a noticed public hearing conducted in accordance with Proposition (“Prop”) 218 on June 22, 2021; and
WHEREAS, the Rate components that make up the monthly Service Charge for Solid Waste Services include the following: 1) the SB 1383 Residential Component (for residential customers only), 2) Service Component; 3) Disposal Component; 4) Organics Waste Processing Component (“Organics Component”); and 5) Recycling Processing Component (“Recycling Component”); and WHEREAS, rates have been adjusted annually pursuant to the Franchise Agreement and approved Prop 218 noticing with the most recent Prop 218 process being conducted and adopted by City Council at a Public Hearing on April 11, 2023; a process which is valid through July 1, 2027; and
WHEREAS, the approved rate adjustment methodology set forth in the Franchise Agreement and most recent approved Prop 218 process is as follows:

The Service Component shall be adjusted based on the percentage increase of the Consumer Price Index (CPI-U) published by the U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, for All Urban Consumers in the Riverside-San Bernardino- Ontario area, using the change in the 12- month annual average of CPI-U index values between the January to December period of the prior year (the previous year), and the January to December period of the year before the prior year (the prior previous year). The annual adjustment will be at least one percent (1.00%) (the “Floor”) and cannot exceed four percent (4.00%) (the “Cap”). If the annual CPI adjustment exceeds the Cap or is less than the Floor, then the amount above the Cap or below the Floor shall be carried over into any succeeding year until such time as it may be applied without violating the Cap or Floor limits.

A. If Waste Management or its affiliates own and/or operate the facility, and the tipping/processing fee is not set or adjusted by a public agency, then the applicable Component (Disposal, Organics, or Recycling) shall be adjusted using the same methodology described above for adjusting the Service Component and be subject to the same Floor and Cap provisions. 603
Resolution 2026-69

Page 2 of 5 ends

B. In all other circumstances (e.g. Waste Management uses a facility owned by a third party or public agency), the applicable Component (Disposal, Organics, or Recycling) shall be adjusted using the actual change in the per ton tip fee or per ton processing fee charged at the disposal, organic waste processing facility, or recyclable processing facility, as applicable, between the previous year and the prior previous year. If Waste Management uses multiple facilities that have different per ton tip/processing fees, the City shall determine the change in the per ton tip/processing fee charged between the previous year and the prior previous year for each applicable facility and multiply this amount by the percentage of the total tonnage delivered to the facility. The City shall then add these sums together to determine the total change in the per ton tip/processing fees for each Component (Disposal, Organics, or Recycling); and WHEREAS, the City Council may adjust the Rates in accordance with the approved rate adjustment methodology effective July 1, 2023 and each July 1 thereafter through July 1, 2027 without undertaking a new Prop 218 process; and
WHEREAS, the City Council adopts this Resolution to approve the Rates for Fiscal Year 2026/2027, effective on July 1, 2026.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Banning as follows:

SECTION 1. The above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein.

SECTION 2. The Rates for Fiscal Year 2026/2027 are increased as follows:

A. The Service Component is increased by 4%;
B. The Recycling Component is increased by 4%;
C. The Disposal Component is increased by 1.44%; and
D. The Organics Component is increased by 0.80% for Fiscal Year 2027.

E. The carried forward percentage balance that remains and can be applied to the Service and Recycling Components at a later date pursuant to the Franchise Agreement and Prop 218 is 3.96% as detailed below:

Rate Period CPI
Requested
CPI %
Applied from
Previous
Years
Total
CPI Applied
CPI
Carried
Forward
Balance
per FY
TOTAL
CPI
Carried
Forward
Balance
Remaining
July 1, 2023 -
June 30, 2024

8.7% 0% 4% 4.7% 4.7%
July 1, 2024 -
June 30, 2025

4.65% 0% 4% 0.65% 5.35%
July 1, 2025 –
June 30, 2026

2.61% 1.39% 4% 0.0% 3.96%
604
Resolution 2026-69

Page 3 of 5 ends

July 1, 2026–
June 30, 2027

3.28% 0.72% 4% 0.0% 3.24%
SECTION 3. The City Council hereby approves the Rates for Fiscal Year 2026/2027, with the above-described increases, with Rates being effective on July 1, 2026, as shown on Exhibit “A”, attached hereto and incorporated herein.

SECTION 4. The City Council has evaluated the Rates approved for Fiscal Year 2026/2027 pursuant to this Resolution for purposes of compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the State CEQA Guidelines and has determined that the adoption of the Rates is an activity covered by the common sense exemption in that it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that adoption of the Rates may have a significant effect on the environment because the adoption of the Rates only address the cost of existing services provided to the public and not the commencement of a new service or program. Accordingly, the City Council hereby finds that the adoption of this Resolution is exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3). Staff is hereby directed to file a Notice of Exemption with the County Clerk of the County of Riverside.

SECTION 5. All previous Collection, Transportation, Disposal and Recycling solid waste structures are hereby adjusted and superseded by the Rates approved by this Resolution as of July 1, 2026. Substantiative errors and/or omissions may be resolved within the parameters and calculation method approved under the Franchise Agreement and Proposition 218 process as accepted by the City Attorney.

SECTION 6. This Resolution shall be effective upon adoption.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 12th day of May, 2026.

Richard Royce, Mayor
City of Banning
ATTEST:

Sandra Calderon, Deputy City Clerk
City of Banning
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

John Pinkney, City Attorney
Slovak, Baron, Empey, Murphy & Pinkney, LLP
605
Resolution 2026-69

Page 4 of 5 ends

CERTIFICATION:

I, Sandra Calderon, Deputy City Clerk of the City of Banning, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution 2026-69, was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Banning, California, at a regular meeting thereof held on the 12th day of May, 2026 by the following vote, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Sandra Calderon, Deputy City Clerk
City of Banning, California
606
Resolution 2026-69

Page 5 of 5 ends

Exhibit A
Effective July 1, 2026 - 2026/2027 Solid Waste Rate Schedule for Collection, Transportation, Disposal and Recycling Services 607
EXHIBIT 9

APPROVED FACILITIES
Contractor has informed City that all Approved Facilities are either Publicly Owned or operated, or owned and operated by Waste Management or an Affiliate.

Operating Facility
Facility: Moreno Valley Hauling and Transfer Station
Owner: Waste Management
SWIS: 33-AA-0234
Location: 17700 Indian Rd., Moreno Valley, CA 92555
Disposal Facilities:

Riverside County landfill system: July 2025 tipping fee: $50.47/ton Facility: El Sobrante Landfill
Owner: Waste Management
SWIS: 33-AA-0217
Location: 10910 Dawson Canyon Rd, Corona, CA 92883
Facility: Lamb Canyon Landfill
Owner: Riverside County
SWIS: 33-AA-0007
Location: 16411 Lamb Canyon Rd, Beaumont, CA 92223
Facility: Badlands Landfill
Owner: Riverside County
SWIS: 33-AA-0006
Location: 31125 Ironwood Avenue, Moreno Valley, CA 92553 Recycling Processing Facilities:

Commingled Recyclables July 2025 tipping fee: $137.29/ton Facility: Azusa Material Recycling Facility
Owner: Waste Management
SWIS: 19-AA-1127
Location: 1501 W. Gladstone St., Azusa, CA 91702
608
Organic Processing Facilities
Commingled Organic Waste
Facility: South Valley Organic Composting Facility - Tipping fee: $117.87/ton Owner: Waste Management
SWIS: 43-AA-0017
Location: 24487 Road 140 Tulare, CA 93274
Facility: WM Pala Composting Facility - Tipping fee: $102.89/ton Owner: Waste Management
SWIS:

Location: 12802 CA-76, Pala, CA 92059
Organic 2025 Tipping Fee: $103.27/ton
Facility: Ecology AZ Composting
Owner: Ecology Auto Parts, Inc
SWIS: Out of State Facility
Location: 59260 Highway 72, Salome, AZ 85348
Organic 2023 Tipping Fee: $
Facility: WM El Corazon Facility – Tipping Fee: $137.40/ton Owner: Waste Management
SWIS: 37-AA-0907
Location: 3210 Oceanside Blvd, Oceanside, CA 92056
Facility: Otay Mesa Compost Facility - Tipping fee: $108.54/ton Owner: Waste Management
SWIS: 37-AA-0988
Location: 434 Alta Rd, San Diego, CA 92154
609
Greenwaste Processing Facilities:

July 2023 tipping fee: $50.00/ton
Facility: SoCal Landscape
Owner: Southern California Landscape Supply
SWIS: 33-AA-0326
Location: 17520 Bridge St, Moreno Valley, CA 92555
July 2023 tipping fee: $51.67/ton
Facility: Organic Depot, LLC
Owner: Sage Ranch-Robert Yanik
SWIS: 33-AA-0346
Location: Aguanga, CA 92536
610
March 31, 2026
Art Vela
Director of Public Works
City of Banning
99 E. Ramsey Street
Banning, CA 92220
RE: 2026/2027 City of Banning Rate Adjustment
Dear Mr. Vela,
WM respectfully requests an annual rate adjustment for the 2026-2027 period, in accordance with Section 4.03 of the Franchise Agreement. As part of our responsibilities, we calculate and submit the annual rate adjustment for Residential and Commercial refuse and recycling services by April 1st of each year.

Attached for your review, please find the updated Schedule of Rates detailing the 2026-2027 rate adjustment, along with the supporting Rate Adjustment Percentage Calculation data.

In accordance with Section 4.03.7 of the Franchise Agreement, the annual rate adjustment allows any unapplied percentage from prior years to be carried forward and applied in a future adjustment, provided it does not violate the provisions of this section. The annual rate cap is 4%, and this year’s 2026–2027 rate adjustment will be 4%. For the 2026–2027 rate adjustment, a carryover of 0.72% has been applied to both the Service Component and the Recycling Component from the previous remaining carryover balance of 3.96%. The remaining carryover balance moving forward is 3.24%. Below is the documentation of the carryover percentages:

Rate Year CPI Cap Carryover Applied/Unapplied Carryover Balance 2023/2024 8.70% 4% Unapplied Carryover - 4.70% 4.70%
2024/2025 4.65% 4% Unapplied Carryover - 0.65% 5.35%
2025/2026 2.61% 4% Applied Carryover - 1.39% 3.96%
2026/2027 3.28% 4% Applied Carryover - 0.72% 3.24%
We appreciate the City of Banning’s continued support and the opportunity to serve its residents and businesses. If you require any additional information or have any questions regarding this year’s annual rate adjustment, please feel free to contact me via email at [email protected] or by phone at (951) 415-4389.

Thank you once again for your time.

Respectfully,
Douglas Tani
WM
611
612
Burrtec WM CR&R Burrtec CR&R WM Burrtec WM Burrtec WM CR&R WM WM CR&R Burrtec WM CR&R CR&R CR&R CR&R Burrtec Burrtec Athens/C
ity
Services
CR&R
Series1 $23.36 $26.35 $29.40 $29.80 $29.85 $29.98 $30.48 $30.60 $30.80 $31.62 $32.18 $32.99 $33.41 $34.15 $34.73 $35.55 $35.61 $35.68 $36.27 $36.39 $36.66 $37.07 $37.32 $39.23 Palm Desert, $23.36
Beaumont
Hemet, $29.40
Rancho Mirage, $29.80
Temecula, $29.85
Corona, $29.98
Indio, $30.48
Banning (Current), $30.60
Cathedral City, $30.80
Banning (Proposed), $31.62
Lake Elsinore, $32.18
Moreno Valley, $32.99
Norco, $33.41
Blythe, $34.15
Coachella, $34.73
Menifee, $35.55
Canyon Lake , $35.61
San Jacinto, $35.68
Calimesa, $36.27
Wildomar, $36.39
Indian Wells, $36.66
Jurupa Valley, $37.07
Riverside, $37.32
Perris, $39.23
$-
$5.00
$10.00 $15.00 $20.00 $25.00 $30.00 $35.00 $40.00 $45.00 Residential Refuse Rate Comparison Effective July 1, 2024 Beaumont, $ 26.35
613
614
Revised 4.22.26 Page 1
Exhibit A
July 1, 2026 - 2026/2027 Solid Waste Rate Schedule
for Collection, Transportation, Disposal and Recycling Services Residential Cart Service Rates Current
Rate New Rate Service Disposal Organics Recycling SB 1383 Basic Rate (96-gal Garbage, 96-gal
Recycling, and 96-gal Organic Waste) $31.62 $32.64 $23.59 $3.30 $1.85 $1.18 $2.72 Late Fees – 2.5% or $5 minimum on balances over $15.00
Tax Roll Fees – 10% of unpaid balance per occurrence
Other Residential Service Rates Current
Rate New Rate Service Disposal Organics Recycling SB 1383 Non-Qualifying Valet Service $17.53 $18.23 $18.23
Additional 96-Gal Garbage Cart $11.66 $12.05 $8.75 $3.30 Additional 64-Gal Garbage Cart $9.29 $9.61 $7.42 $2.19
Additional 35-Gal Garbage Cart $6.98 $7.23 $6.02 $1.21
Additional Recycle Cart - Any Size $2.95 $3.07 $1.89 $1.18 Additional Organic Waste Cart –
Any Size $6.93 $7.14 $5.29 $1.85
Residential Set-up Fee $15.19 $15.80 $15.80
Cart Exchange - Excess of 1 p/year $34.76 $36.15 $36.15 Additional Bulky & E-waste - Per Item $26.44 $27.50 $27.50 Residential Contamination/Overage Fee $20.68 $21.51 $21.51 Return Service Fee $20.00 $20.80 $20.80
Insufficient Funds Fee $25.00 $25.00 $25.00
Additional Sharps Refill Fee 1.4 QT
(after 1 free kit/year) $52.63 $54.73 $54.73
Cart Cleaning Fee $34.75 $36.14 $36.14
Late Fees – 2.5% or $5 minimum on balances over $15.00
Tax Roll Fees – 10% of unpaid balance per occurrence
Commercial Cart Collection
Service Rates
Current
Rate New Rate Service Disposal Organics Recycling SB 1383 96 Gallon Garbage Cart, 1x a week* $16.03 $16.59 $13.29 $3.30 96 Gallon Garbage Cart, 2x a week* $28.88 $29.87 $23.28 $6.59 96 Gallon Garbage Cart, 3x a week* $43.34 $44.82 $34.93 $9.89 96 Gallon Garbage Cart, 4x a week* $57.79 $59.77 $46.58 $13.19 96 Gallon Garbage Cart, 5x a week* $72.27 $74.74 $58.24 $16.50 96 Gallon Recycle Cart, 1x a week* $13.49 $14.03 $12.85 $1.18 96 Gallon Recycle Cart, 2x a week* $24.29 $25.26 $22.90 $2.36 96 Gallon Recycle Cart, 3x a week* $36.43 $37.89 $34.34 $3.55 96 Gallon Recycle Cart, 4x a week* $48.56 $50.50 $45.78 $4.72 96 Gallon Recycle Cart, 5x a week* $60.70 $63.13 $57.22 $5.91 MAXIMUM 2 Carts Per Commercial Service Unit
*Commercial cart service due to space constraints or low waste generation must be pre-approved by the City Commercial Bin
Garbage Collection
Service Rates Current Rate New Rate Service Disposal Organics Recycling SB 1383 2 Yard, 1x a week $139.91 $145.05 $126.91 $18.14
2 Yard, 2x a week $279.83 $290.10 $253.82 $36.28
615
Revised 4.22.26 Page 2
2 Yard, 3x a week $409.11 $424.10 $369.69 $54.41
2 Yard, 4x a week $541.07 $560.88 $488.31 $72.57
2 Yard, 5x a week $670.36 $694.89 $604.18 $90.71
2 Yard, 6x a week $799.68 $828.92 $720.06 $108.86
3 Yard, 1x a week $183.39 $190.04 $162.81 $27.23
3 Yard, 2x a week $366.74 $380.03 $325.62 $54.41
3 Yard, 3x a week $536.84 $556.25 $474.60 $81.65
3 Yard, 4x a week $706.91 $732.44 $623.58 $108.86
3 Yard, 5x a week $877.02 $908.67 $772.60 $136.07
3 Yard, 6x a week $1,047.11 $1,084.88 $921.60 $163.28
4 Yard, 1x a week $245.36 $254.25 $217.97 $36.28
4 Yard, 2x a week $490.70 $508.50 $435.93 $72.57
4 Yard, 3x a week $717.52 $743.48 $634.62 $108.86
4 Yard, 4x a week $946.97 $981.19 $836.07 $145.12
4 Yard, 5x a week $1,173.77 $1,216.14 $1,034.73 $181.41 4 Yard, 6x a week $1,400.59 $1,451.12 $1,233.41 $217.71 6 Yard, 1x a week $345.50 $357.94 $303.53 $54.41
6 Yard, 2x a week $691.06 $715.96 $607.10 $108.86
6 Yard, 3x a week $1,012.68 $1,049.07 $885.79 $163.28
6 Yard, 4x a week $1,331.67 $1,379.44 $1,161.73 $217.71 6 Yard, 5x a week $1,653.35 $1,712.61 $1,440.48 $272.13 6 Yard, 6x a week $1,972.35 $2,043.01 $1,716.45 $326.56 (Service available if also subscribed to Recycling or Organics above Compliance Service minimum) Commercial Garbage
Compactor Collection
Service Rates Current Rate New Rate Service Disposal Organics Recycling SB 1383 2 Yard, 1x a week $194.86 $201.28 $146.87 $54.41
2 Yard, 2x a week $389.71 $402.56 $293.70 $108.86
2 Yard, 3x a week $573.96 $592.80 $429.52 $163.28
2 Yard, 4x a week $760.86 $785.80 $568.09 $217.71
2 Yard, 5x a week $945.11 $976.04 $703.91 $272.13
2 Yard, 6x a week $1,129.34 $1,166.28 $839.72 $326.56
3 Yard, 1x a week $265.80 $274.37 $192.72 $81.65
3 Yard, 2x a week $531.61 $548.76 $385.48 $163.28
3 Yard, 3x a week $784.10 $809.29 $564.37 $244.92
3 Yard, 4x a week $1,036.60 $1,069.83 $743.27 $326.56
3 Yard, 5x a week $1,289.09 $1,330.35 $922.15 $408.20
3 Yard, 6x a week $1,541.63 $1,590.93 $1,101.09 $489.84 4 Yard, 1x a week $355.27 $366.74 $257.88 $108.86
4 Yard, 2x a week $710.49 $733.42 $515.72 $217.70
4 Yard, 3x a week $1,047.18 $1,080.83 $754.27 $326.56
4 Yard, 4x a week $1,386.52 $1,430.99 $995.60 $435.39
4 Yard, 5x a week $1,723.26 $1,778.46 $1,234.20 $544.26 4 Yard, 6x a week $2,059.96 $2,125.87 $1,472.76 $653.11 6 Yard, 1x a week $510.35 $526.65 $363.37 $163.28
6 Yard, 2x a week $1,020.68 $1,053.27 $726.71 $326.56
6 Yard, 3x a week $1,507.17 $1,555.09 $1,065.25 $489.84 6 Yard, 4x a week $1,991.02 $2,054.18 $1,401.07 $653.11 6 Yard, 5x a week $2,477.54 $2,556.04 $1,739.64 $816.40 6 Yard, 6x a week $2,961.34 $3,055.07 $2,075.40 $979.67 (Service available if also subscribed to Recycling or Organics above Compliance Service minimum) 616
Revised 4.22.26 Page 3
Commercial Bin
Recycling Collection
Service Rates Current Rate New Rate Service Disposal Organics Recycling SB 1383 2 Yard, 1x a week $129.72 $134.91 $124.30 $10.61
2 Yard, 2x a week $259.41 $269.79 $248.59 $21.20
3 Yard, 1x a week $166.05 $172.69 $156.79 $15.90
3 Yard, 2x a week $332.10 $345.38 $313.57 $31.81
4 Yard, 1x a week $220.53 $229.36 $208.16 $21.20
4 Yard, 2x a week $441.13 $458.77 $416.33 $42.44
6 Yard, 1x a week $285.39 $296.80 $264.99 $31.81
6 Yard, 2x a week $570.82 $593.66 $530.03 $63.63
Extra Pick Up – Recycle $96.27 $100.12 $100.12
Contamination Fee $96.96 $100.84 $100.84
(Available if additional capacity is needed above Recycling or Organics Compliance Service minimum) Commercial Organic
Waste Collection
Service Rates Current Rate New Rate Service Disposal Organics Recycling SB 1383 64 Gallon, 1x a week $68.49 $70.48 $46.71 $23.77
64 Gallon, 2x a week $136.98 $140.95 $93.40 $47.55
64 Gallon, 3x a week $205.49 $211.45 $140.12 $71.33
64 Gallon, 4x a week $273.99 $281.94 $186.84 $95.10
64 Gallon, 5x a week $342.45 $352.37 $233.51 $118.86
64 Gallon, 6x a week $410.95 $422.86 $280.22 $142.64
2 Yard, 1x a week $382.01 $392.54 $242.47 $150.07
2 Yard, 2x a week $764.04 $785.07 $484.97 $300.10
2 Yard, 3x a week $1,146.13 $1,177.68 $727.52 $450.16
2 Yard, 4x a week $1,528.14 $1,570.21 $970.02 $600.19
2 Yard, 5x a week $1,910.15 $1,962.73 $1,212.48 $750.25 2 Yard, 6x a week $2,292.19 $2,355.30 $1,454.99 $900.31 (Available if additional capacity is needed above Recycling or Organics Compliance Service minimum) Commercial Garbage,
Recycling, And Organic
Waste Bundled
Collection Service
Rates Current Rate New Rate Service Disposal Organics Recycling SB 1383 2 Yard Garbage bin, 1x a
week $221.91 $229.58 $186.49 $18.14 $23.77 $1.18
2 Yard Garbage bin, 2x a
week $361.79 $374.60 $313.36 $36.29 $23.77 $1.18
2 Yard Garbage bin, 3x a
week $491.09 $508.61 $429.25 $54.41 $23.77 $1.18
2 Yard Garbage bin, 4x a
week $623.05 $645.39 $547.87 $72.57 $23.77 $1.18
2 Yard Garbage bin, 5x a
week $752.36 $779.42 $663.76 $90.71 $23.77 $1.18
2 Yard Garbage bin, 6x a
week $881.65 $913.42 $779.61 $108.86 $23.77 $1.18
617
Revised 4.22.26 Page 4
3 Yard Garbage bin, 1x a
week $265.36 $274.54 $222.36 $27.23 $23.77 $1.18
3 Yard Garbage bin, 2x a
week $448.73 $464.56 $385.20 $54.41 $23.77 $1.18
3 Yard Garbage bin, 3x a
week $618.80 $640.74 $534.14 $81.65 $23.77 $1.18
3 Yard Garbage bin, 4x a
week $788.90 $816.97 $683.16 $108.86 $23.77 $1.18
3 Yard Garbage bin, 5x a
week $959.01 $993.19 $832.17 $136.07 $23.77 $1.18
3 Yard Garbage bin, 6x a
week $1,129.10 $1,169.40 $981.17 $163.28 $23.77 $1.18
4 Yard Garbage bin, 1x a
week $327.34 $338.77 $277.53 $36.29 $23.77 $1.18
4 Yard Garbage bin, 2x a
week $572.68 $593.01 $495.49 $72.57 $23.77 $1.18
4 Yard Garbage bin, 3x a
week $799.51 $828.00 $694.19 $108.86 $23.77 $1.18
4 Yard Garbage bin, 4x a
week $1,028.95 $1,065.70 $895.63 $145.12 $23.77 $1.18
4 Yard Garbage bin, 5x a
week $1,255.76 $1,300.67 $1,094.30 $181.42 $23.77 $1.18 4 Yard Garbage bin, 6x a
week $1,482.59 $1,535.65 $1,292.99 $217.71 $23.77 $1.18 6 Yard Garbage bin, 1x a
week $427.49 $442.47 $363.11 $54.41 $23.77 $1.18
6 Yard Garbage bin, 2x a
week $773.03 $800.46 $666.65 $108.86 $23.77 $1.18
6 Yard Garbage bin, 3x a
week $1,094.65 $1,133.57 $945.34 $163.28 $23.77 $1.18
6 Yard Garbage bin, 4x a
week $1,413.66 $1,463.96 $1,221.30 $217.71 $23.77 $1.18 6 Yard Garbage bin, 5x a
week $1,735.35 $1,797.14 $1,500.06 $272.13 $23.77 $1.18 6 Yard Garbage bin, 6x a
week $2,054.32 $2,127.51 $1,776.00 $326.56 $23.77 $1.18 96 Gallon Garbage Cart,
1x a week*
$98.02 $101.11 $72.86 $3.30 $23.77 $1.18
96 Gallon Garbage Cart,
2x a week* $157.37 $162.75 $131.21 $6.59 $23.77 $1.18
96 Gallon Garbage Cart,
3x a week* $223.71 $231.66 $196.82 $9.89 $23.77 $1.18
96 Gallon Garbage Cart,
4x a week* $290.06 $300.58 $262.44 $13.19 $23.77 $1.18
96 Gallon Garbage Cart,
5x a week* $356.44 $369.53 $328.08 $16.50 $23.77 $1.18
All services include 1 time per week collection with 96-gallon Recycling Cart and 64-gallon Organic Waste Cart *Commercial cart service due to space constraints or low waste generation must be pre-approved by City 618
Revised 4.22.26 Page 5
Commercial & Recycle
Bundled Collection
Service Rates (Organic
Waste Service Exempt) Current Rate New Rate Service Disposal Organics Recycling SB 1383 2 Yard Garbage bin, 1x
a week $153.64 $159.64 $140.02 $18.14 $1.18
2 Yard Garbage bin, 2x
a week $293.74 $304.58 $267.11 $36.29 $1.18
2 Yard Garbage bin, 3x
a week $423.27 $438.83 $383.24 $54.41 $1.18
2 Yard Garbage bin, 4x
a week $555.45 $575.84 $502.09 $72.57 $1.18
2 Yard Garbage bin, 5x
a week $684.99 $710.11 $618.22 $90.71 $1.18
2 Yard Garbage bin, 6x
a week $814.53 $844.37 $734.33 $108.86 $1.18
3 Yard Garbage bin, 1x
a week $197.21 $204.42 $176.01 $27.23 $1.18
3 Yard Garbage bin, 2x
a week $380.91 $394.78 $339.19 $54.41 $1.18
3 Yard Garbage bin, 3x
a week $551.34 $571.34 $488.51 $81.65 $1.18
3 Yard Garbage bin, 4x
a week $721.77 $747.90 $637.86 $108.86 $1.18
3 Yard Garbage bin, 5x
a week $892.03 $924.28 $787.03 $136.07 $1.18
3 Yard Garbage bin, 6x
a week $1,062.10 $1,100.47 $936.01 $163.28 $1.18
4 Yard Garbage bin, 1x
a week $259.31 $268.78 $231.31 $36.29 $1.18
4 Yard Garbage bin, 2x
a week $505.08 $523.46 $449.71 $72.57 $1.18
4 Yard Garbage bin, 3x
a week $732.36 $758.92 $648.88 $108.86 $1.18
4 Yard Garbage bin, 4x
a week $961.96 $996.78 $850.48 $145.12 $1.18
4 Yard Garbage bin, 5x
a week $1,188.77 $1,231.75 $1,049.15 $181.42 $1.18
4 Yard Garbage bin, 6x
a week $1,415.59 $1,466.72 $1,247.83 $217.71 $1.18
6 Yard Garbage bin, 1x
a week $359.66 $372.68 $317.09 $54.41 $1.18
6 Yard Garbage bin, 2x
a week $705.91 $731.41 $621.37 $108.86 $1.18
6 Yard Garbage bin, 3x
a week $1,027.66 $1,064.65 $900.19 $163.28 $1.18
6 Yard Garbage bin, 4x
a week $1,346.67 $1,395.05 $1,176.16 $217.71 $1.18
6 Yard Garbage bin, 5x
a week $1,668.37 $1,728.24 $1,454.93 $272.13 $1.18
6 Yard Garbage bin, 6x
a week $1,987.33 $2,058.59 $1,730.85 $326.56 $1.18
96 Gallon Garbage Cart,
1x a week*
$29.53 $30.64 $26.16 $3.30 $1.18
619
Revised 4.22.26 Page 6
96 Gallon Garbage Cart,
2x a week* $53.19 $55.15 $46.20 $6.59 $2.36
96 Gallon Garbage Cart,
3x a week* $79.78 $82.72 $69.28 $9.89 $3.55
96 Gallon Garbage Cart,
4x a week* $106.37 $110.29 $92.38 $13.19 $4.72
96 Gallon Garbage Cart,
5x a week* $132.99 $137.89 $115.49 $16.50 $5.90
All services include 1 time per week collection with 96-gallon Recycling Cart *Commercial cart service due to space constraints or low waste generation must be pre-approved by City Roll-Off Service Rates Current Rate New Rate Service Disposal Organics Recycling SB 1383 40 Yard with 4 tons $713.02 $736.25 $526.77 $209.48
Compactor – plus landfill
tipping fees
$500.50 $520.52 $520.52
40 Yard Permanent plus
landfill tipping fees $387.70 $403.21 $403.21
10 Yard Permanent plus
tipping fee $387.70 $403.21 $403.21
Roll-Off Recycle/per load $387.70 $403.21 $403.21
Delivery/Relocate/Trip
Charge $141.50 $147.16 $147.16
Minimum Pull Fee (1 per
month) $387.70 $403.21 $403.21
Industrial Set-up Fee $32.90 $34.22 $34.22
Other Commercial
Collection Service
Rates Current Rate New Rate Service Disposal Organics Recycling SB 1383 Extra Pick Up –
Garbage $96.27 $100.12 $100.12
Lost, Stolen, or Burned
Bin – 3 yard $672.29 $699.18 $699.18
Lost, Stolen, or Burned
Bin – 6 yard $980.97 $1,020.21 $1,020.21
Lost, Stolen, or Burned
Cart - 64 Gallon $54.37 $56.54 $56.54
Lost, Stolen, or Burned
Cart - 96 Gallon $60.13 $62.54 $62.54
Cart Overage Fee $20.66 $21.49 $21.49
Bin Overage Fee $85.77 $89.20 $89.20
Temporary 3 Yard
Garbage Bin -
One month with up to 4
collections
$330.11 $342.63 $315.41 $27.22
Temporary 3 Yard
Garbage Bin - 7 day $201.99 $209.91 $203.62 $6.29
Locking Lids $23.54 $24.48 $24.48
Commercial Set-up
Fee/Reactivation Fee $28.33 $29.46 $29.46
Bin Exchange $73.89 $76.85 $76.85
620
Revised 4.22.26 Page 7
Replacement Lock $49.04 $51.00 $51.00
Replacement key $9.80 $10.19 $10.19
Pull-out service per bin
16-35 feet $21.43 $22.29 $22.29
Pull-out service per bin
36-50 feet $32.19 $33.48 $33.48
Pull-out service per bin
over 51 feet $42.90 $44.62 $44.62
Return to Service $38.57 $40.11 $40.11
Insufficient Funds Fee $25.00 $25.00 $25.00
Bin Cleaning Fee $73.88 $76.84 $76.84
Cart Cleaning Fee $34.75 $36.14 $36.14
Cart Contamination Fee $20.65 $21.48 $21.48
Bin Contamination Fee $96.96 $100.84 $100.84
Late Fees – 2.5% or $5 minimum on balances over $15.00
Tax Roll Fees (MFD Only) – 10% of unpaid balance per occurrence 621

CITY OF BANNING

STAFF REPORT
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Elizabeth Gibbs, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Holly Stuart, Public Works Program Manager Arturo Vela, Director of Public Works
MEETING DATE: May 12, 2026
SUBJECT: Make a Determination of Exemption Under the California Environmental Quality Act and Consideration of Resolution 2026-70, Receiving a Report in Connection with the proposed Collection on the 2026-27 Riverside County Property Tax Roll of Delinquent Solid Waste Service Charges for Single-Family and Multi-Family Accounts for Calendar Year 2025, Setting a Public Hearing on the Report.

RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt Resolution 2026-70
BACKGROUND:

On April 27, 2021, the City Council approved a solid waste franchise agreement with Waste Management of the Inland Empire (Waste Management) for Residential and Commercial Garbage, Recyclable Materials and Organics Waste Collection, Transportation, Recycling and Disposal Services (Franchise Agreement), effective July 1, 2021.

In accordance with the Franchise Agreement, on October 12, 2021, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 1576, amending and restating Chapter 8.28, “Garbage Collection and Disposal,” of Title 8, “Health and Safety,” of the Banning Municipal Code. In addition to implementing many aspects of the new Franchise Agreement, the ordinance allows the collection of delinquent residential service charges on the County Tax Roll in accordance with the Franchise Agreement and Article 4 of Chapter 6 of Part 3 of Division 5 of the California Health and Safety Code, commencing with Section 5470 (“Article 4”). The operative date of the amendments to the Municipal Code was January 1, 2022.

Pursuant to Article 4, delinquent charges collected on the County Tax Roll will be collected in the same manner, by the same persons, and at the same time as, together with and not separately from, the general taxes of the City.

The Franchise Agreement provides that Waste Management shall provide solid waste collection services to residential accounts, which includes both single-family dwellings (SFD) and multi-family dwellings (MFD). Pursuant to the Franchise Agreement, services provided to residential accounts that become delinquent are not able to be discontinued. In consideration of Waste Management not being able to discontinue residential services, the City committed to working with Waste Management in placing qualifying residential delinquencies on the County Tax Roll.

To initiate the process, the Franchise Agreement requires Waste Management, on May 1st of each year or such other agreed upon date, to notify the City in writing that it seeks to have the City place qualifying 622
delinquencies on the County Tax Roll. At no cost to the City, Waste Management is responsible for timely preparing required information, reports, notices, and materials.

Pursuant to the Franchise Agreement, a qualifying delinquent charge is a SFD or MFD charge that is at least 90 days in arrears and for which Waste Management has provided at least one written notice of the delinquency by mail to the service recipient and to the property owner, as listed on the last equalized assessment roll.

JUSTIFICATION:

In accordance with Article 4, and as permitted by the Franchise Agreement, Waste Management submitted a formal letter to the City requesting that qualifying delinquent solid waste service charges for calendar year 2025 be placed on the 2026-27 County Tax Roll, including a description of each parcel within the City for which there is a qualifying delinquent charge (“Identified Parcel”) and the delinquent amount for each Identified Parcel (the “Report”). The Report is on file in the office of the City Clerk.

Amounts listed in the Report include past due charges for service and delinquent fees (2.5% or $5 minimum on balances over $15). Additionally, County Tax Roll Fees amount to 10% of unpaid balances per occurrence.

For the 2025 calendar year period, Waste Management’s request amounts to 1,032 delinquent residential accounts for a total principal balance of $225,363. The principal balance includes all invoices within the dates of January 1, 2025, through December 31, 2025, and includes service fees, monthly late fees, extra services, and may include multiple account billings for some parcels. Multiple account billings usually occur when the parcel has multiple units on one parcel.

The City Council must hold a Public Hearing on the Report and cause notice of the Public Hearing to be published and mailed. Under this resolution, the City acknowledges receipt of the Report, sets a public hearing on the Report on June 23, 2026, and directs the City Clerk or designee to cause notice of the public hearing to be mailed and published. Notice must be published at least 14 days prior to the date of the Public Hearing and again at least five days after the first publication. The notice must be mailed at least 14 days prior to the Public Hearing to the owner of each Identified Parcel at the address shown on the last equalized assessment roll available on the date the Report was prepared or as known to the City Clerk, and to the address to which the invoices are customarily mailed, if different than the owner’s address.

The notice will inform delinquent account holders or parcel owners that they have until July 17, 2026, to settle any outstanding balances directly with Waste Management to avoid being included on the County Tax Roll. After this deadline, Waste Management will submit a final Report to the City, reflecting the removal of any accounts that have resolved their delinquencies. At the time of the Public Hearing, City staff will provide an updated Report showing the current number of delinquent residential accounts to be placed on the County Tax Roll, as well as the revised principal balance, excluding any amounts that have been resolved.

At the Public Hearing, the City Council shall hear and consider all objections or protests, if any, to the Report. If the City Council finds at the conclusion of the Public Hearing that the protest is made by the owners of a majority of the separate Identified Parcels, then the Report shall not be adopted, and the delinquent charges shall not be collected on the County Tax Roll. In the absence of a majority protest, the City Council may adopt or reduce any delinquent charge or overrule any or all objections.

By approving this Resolution, the City Manager or their designee is authorized, prior to the submission of the delinquent charges to the County Auditor Controller for collection on the 2026-27 County Tax Roll, to remove from the Report any Identified Parcel for which the delinquent charge has been paid in full, or to reduce the delinquent amount set forth in the Report for any Identified Parcel for which there has been a partial payment of the delinquent amount.
623
Under this approval, the City Council will be authorizing the scheduling of a Public Hearing on June 23, 2026, and directing staff to initiate the County Tax Roll collection process.

CEQA
City staff has evaluated the proposed collection of the delinquent charges on the County Tax Roll for purposes of compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the State CEQA Guidelines. City staff has determined that the proposed collection of delinquent charges on the tax roll is an activity covered by the common sense exemption in that it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that such collection may have a significant effect on the environment because the collection only addresses the cost of an existing service provided to the public and not the commencement of a new service or program. Accordingly, the process for the collection of the delinquent charges on the County Tax Roll is exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3).

FISCAL IMPACT:

At no cost to the City, Waste Management shall be responsible, without limitation, for all costs associated with preparing required information, including but not limited to, reports, notices, and materials, publication costs, and Riverside County fees. The Franchise Agreement provides that the City will pay Waste Management funds collected from the payment of the delinquent charges placed on the County Tax Roll, less the franchise fee equal to twelve and one-half percent (12.5%).

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Reso 2026-70.docx

2. WM Tax Roll Notification Letter.pdf
624
Resolution 2026-70

Page 1 of 4 ends

RESOLUTION 2026-70

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BANNING, CALIFORNIA,

RECEIVING A REPORT IN CONNECTION WITH THE PROPOSED COLLECTION ON THE 2026-27 RIVERSIDE COUNTY PROPERTY TAX ROLL OF DELINQUENT SOLID WASTE

SERVICE CHARGES FOR SINGLE-FAMILY AND MULTI-FAMILY ACCOUNTS, SETTING A

PUBLIC HEARING ON THE REPORT, AND MAKING A DETERMINATION OF EXEMPTION

UNDER CEQA
WHEREAS, the City Council is authorized pursuant to Section 8.28.270 of the Banning Municipal Code and Article 4 of Chapter 6 of Part 3 of Division 5 of the California Health and Safety Code, commencing with Section 5470 (“HSC Code”), to levy and collect annual service charges for the collection, transportation, recycling and disposal of solid waste (“Charges”) and to have the delinquent Charges for single-family and multi-family accounts collected on the County of Riverside Property Tax Roll (“Tax Roll”); and WHEREAS, the City Council agreed to collect qualifying delinquent Charges for singlefamily and multi-family accounts on the Tax Roll in consideration of the agreement of the City’s franchised hauler, Waste Management of the Inland Empire (“Waste Management”), not to discontinue collection services for single-family and multi-family customers with delinquent accounts; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to HSC Section 5473, delinquent Charges collected on the Tax Roll shall be collected in the same manner, by the same persons, and at the same time as, together with and not separately from, the general taxes of the City; and WHEREAS, pursuant to its solid waste franchise agreement with the City, Waste Management notified the City in writing by May 1, 2026, that it seeks to have the City collect qualifying delinquent Charges for single-family and multi-family accounts for the 2025 calendar year on the 2026-27 Tax Roll. Pursuant to the Franchise Agreement, a qualifying delinquent Charge is a Charge that is at least 90 days in arrears and for which Waste Management has provided at least one written notice of the delinquency by mail to the service recipient and to the property owner, as the property owner is listed on the last equalized assessment roll (“Delinquent Charge”); and
WHEREAS, the City has caused a written report to be prepared and filed with the City Clerk in accordance with HSC Sections 5473 and 5473a (“Report”). The Report contains a description of each parcel within the City for which there is Delinquent Charge in connection with a single-family or multi-family account (“Identified Parcel”) and the delinquent amount for each Identified Parcel. The City has received the Report, which is on file in the office of the City Clerk; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to set a public hearing on the Report pursuant to HSC Sections 5473 and 5473a to consider collecting the Delinquent Charges on the 2026-27 Tax Roll, as described herein.
625
Resolution 2026-70

Page 2 of 4 ends

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Banning as follows:

SECTION 1. Each of the above recitals is true and correct and is adopted by the City Council.

SECTION 2. The City Council concurs with staff’s determination that the proposed collection of the Delinquent Charges on the 2026-27 Tax Roll is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that such collection will have a significant effect on the environment because the collection of the Delinquent Charges on the Tax Roll only addresses the cost of an existing service provided to the public and not the commencement of a new service or program. Consequently, the City Council finds the process for the collection of the Delinquent Charges on the 2026-27 Tax Roll is exempt from CEQA pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 (b)(3).

SECTION 3. The City Council hereby sets a Public Hearing at 5:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, in the City Council Chambers, 99 East Ramsey Street, Banning, CA, on June 23, 2026, to hear any objections or protests to the Report and the collection of the Delinquent Charges on the 2026-27 Tax Roll in accordance with the Report.

SECTION 4. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause notice of the filing of the Report and the time and place of the Public Hearing thereon to be: (i) published prior to the date set for the Public Hearing pursuant to HSC Section 5473.1 and Government Code Section 6066, and (ii) mailed at least 14 days prior to the date of the Public Hearing to the owner of each Identified Parcel at the address shown on the last equalized assessment roll available on the date the Report was prepared or as known to the City Clerk, and to the service address, if different than the owner’s address.

SECTION 5. At the Public Hearing, the City Council shall hear and consider all objections or protests, if any, to the Report. The City Council may continue the Public Hearing from time to time. If the City Council finds at the conclusion of the Public Hearing that the protest is made by the owners of a majority of the separate Identified Parcels, then the Report shall not be adopted and the Delinquent Charges shall be collected separately from the Tax Roll and shall not constitute a lien against any parcel. In the absence of a majority protest, the City Council may adopt or reduce any Delinquent Charge or overrule any or all objections and shall make its determination upon the Delinquent Charges as described in the Report, which determination shall be final. Further, the City Council authorizes the City Manager or designee, prior to the submission of the Delinquent Charges to the County Auditor Controller for collection on the 2026-27 Tax Roll, to remove from the Report any Identified Parcel for which the Delinquent Charge has been paid in full, or to reduce the delinquent amount set forth in the Report for any Identified Parcel for which there has been a partial payment of the delinquent amount.

SECTION 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution and shall cause a certified resolution to be filed in the book of original resolutions.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 12th day of May 2026. 626
Resolution 2026-70

Page 3 of 4 ends

Richard Royce, Mayor
City of Banning
ATTEST:

Sandra Calderon, Deputy City Clerk
City of Banning
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

John Pinkney, City Attorney
627
Resolution 2026-70

Page 4 of 4 ends

CERTIFICATION:

I, Sandra Calderon, Deputy City Clerk of the City of Banning, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution 2026-70, was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Banning, California, at a regular meeting thereof held on the 12th day of May 2026 by the following vote, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Sandra Calderon, Deputy City Clerk
City of Banning, California
628
April 23, 2026
Mr. Art Vela, P.E.

Director of Public Works/City Engineer
City of Banning
99 East Ramsey Street
Banning, CA 92220
RE: 2025 Tax Roll Process
Dear Mr. Vela,
As a formality and in accordance with WM’s responsibilities under Section 4.02.1 of the Franchise Agreement, WM is required to provide written notification by May 1st of its intent to place delinquent accounts on the tax roll for calendar year 2025.

4.02.1 Delinquent SFD and MFD Service Accounts. Contractor shall provide SFD and MFD Service Recipients with a notice of delinquency in the event of non-payment if an account is five (5) or more days past due.

Contractor will not discontinue Collection Service from delinquent SFD and MFD Service Units. In consideration for Contractor’s agreement to not discontinue Collection Service from delinquent SFD and MFD Service Units, City agrees to assist Contractor with placing and collecting qualifying delinquencies on the tax roll in accordance with Health & Safety Code §5473a. Contractor shall, by May 1st of each year or at such other time as agreed upon by City and Contractor, notify City in writing as to whether it will seek to have City place and collect qualifying delinquencies on the tax roll. Contractor shall be responsible for timely preparing, at no cost to City, all required information, reports, notices, and materials including without limitation, the report required by Health & Safety Code §5473, the notices required by Health & Safety Code §5473.1 and paying for any publication costs. City agrees that it shall within one-hundred twenty (120) days after the Effective Date of this Agreement adopt the necessary ordinance authorizing collection of eligible delinquent SFD and MFD Service Recipients on the tax roll, and to hold all hearings, timely publish all notices, and to timely make all filings required under the above sections, provided Contractor has timely provided the required information, reports, notices, and materials to City. For the purposes of this Section, a “qualifying delinquency” is an SFD or MFD Service Recipient that is at least ninety (90) days in arrears and for which Contractor has provided at least one written notice of the delinquency delivered to the service recipient and to the property owner, as that owner is listed on the last equalized assessment roll, by mail. City shall pay Contractor money collected from payment of the delinquent fees, less the Franchise Fee and the City’s cost to administer the tax roll lien process.

Once the dates are established, we will provide the customer delinquent report, issue customer notifications, and supply all required information and support for the hearing, as well as any other activities related to this matter.

Should you have any questions, please contact me at (951) 415-4389. Thank you for your time.

Respectfully,
Douglas Tani
WM Public Sector
629

CITY OF BANNING

STAFF REPORT
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Elizabeth Gibbs, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Marisol Lopez, Economic Development Manager Elizabeth Gibbs, City Manager
MEETING DATE: May 12, 2026
SUBJECT: Lamar Billboard – Agreement Overview and Selection of City Advertisement Rendering
RECOMMENDATION:

Receive and file the overview of the Lamar billboard agreement and provide staff with direction by selecting a preferred advertisement rendering (Attachment A, B, or C) for display on the City of Banning Lamar billboard.

Additionally, provide any desired feedback or modifications to the selected design.

Upon City Council selection, staff will:

Finalize the selected design incorporating any Council feedback; Coordinate with Lamar Advertising for production and installation; and Schedule the advertisement update in accordance with the agreement’s annual no-cost change provision.

BACKGROUND:

The City of Banning’s use of the Lamar billboard originates from land use entitlements granted in 2001 to Martin Communications (now Lamar Advertising) through Conditional Use Permits and Variance approvals approved by the City Council under Resolution No. 2001-111.

As part of those approvals, the billboard operator agreed to provide a public benefit to the City in exchange for the approval of billboard structures within the railroad right-of-way corridor. This public benefit includes dedicating one outdoor advertising face for the City’s continuous and exclusive use to promote and market the City of Banning.

A formal letter from the City Manager dated November 21, 2001, confirms that one sign face would be made available for the City’s continuous use only and that no additional City Council action is required to utilize this advertising space.

Supporting correspondence and City records further confirm that the operator agreed to:
630
Provide one advertising face for ongoing City use at no cost; Change the advertisement copy once per year at no cost to the City; Illuminate the billboard at no cost to the City; and
Relocate the billboard, if necessary, at the operator’s expense.

City Council agenda materials dated February 25, 2003, further confirm that the billboard display space is provided free of charge with the understanding that it may be refreshed annually and is intended to support economic development messaging to travelers along Interstate 10.

This arrangement continues under Lamar Advertising as the successor entity to Martin Communications.

To support updated City branding and economic development messaging, the City of Banning Economic Development Committee—comprised of Mayor Richard Royce, Council Member Leroy Miller, City Manager Elizabeth Gibbs, Economic Development Manager Marisol Lopez, and Multimedia Specialist John Garside, met on March 12, 2026, to review and discuss updated billboard advertisement concepts.

Three updated design renderings have been prepared and are included for City Council consideration:

Attachment A – Billboard Design Concept (2026)
Attachment B – Billboard Design Concept (2026)
Attachment C – Billboard Design Concept (2026)
Attachment D – Existing Billboard Image
These concepts reflect updated branding, messaging, and visual positioning aligned with the City’s economic development goals.

JUSTIFICATION:

The Lamar billboard serves as a longstanding, no-cost, City-controlled marketing asset secured through prior City Council land use approvals.

The City receives this advertising space as a public benefit condition tied to the approval of Conditional Use Permits and Variances for billboard structures. This ensures that the City receives ongoing value in exchange for allowing private billboard operations within City limits.

Updating the billboard content:

Ensures the City’s messaging remains current, clear, and visually effective; Supports business attraction and economic development efforts; Enhances visibility along a major regional corridor (Interstate 10); and Aligns with the City’s Banning 2030 – Designing Our Future NOW! Economic Development Framework, including:

Tier 1 (Policy):

Reinforcing a clear, business-friendly economic vision and promoting the City of Banning as a place for investment, visitation, and opportunity.

Tier 2 (Implementation):

Advancing targeted marketing and business attraction strategies by showcasing the City’s assets, 631
location advantages, and quality of life.

The collaborative review by the Economic Development Committee ensures a coordinated and strategic approach to City branding. City Council direction on a preferred rendering will allow staff to proceed with implementation consistent with the agreement and the City’s broader economic development objectives.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no fiscal impact associated with updating the billboard advertisement.

Per the agreement terms established through prior approvals:

The advertising face is provided at no cost to the City; One advertisement change per year is provided at no cost; and Illumination and maintenance are provided at no cost.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Billboard 1 adjusted A 2.jpg

2. Billboard 1 adjusted B 2.jpg

3. Billboard 1 adjusted C 2.jpg

4. Billboard Attachment D Existing Image (2026).png

5. CC Agenda Packet - Regular Meeting - 2_25_2003.pdf

6. CC Resolution No. 2001-111_ConditionalUsePermits_MartinCommunications.pdf

7. Static Bulletin - 10'6x36 - Spec Sheet (1).pdf
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
RESOLUTION NO. 2001-111

RESOLUTION OF FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS OF THE CITY COUNCIL

OF THE CITY OF BANNING IN SUPPORT OF THE GRANTING OF THE

APPEAL OF APPELLANT MARTIN COMMUNICATIONS IN THE MATTER OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS 01-803 THROUGH 01-808
WHEREAS, at its meeting of September 4, 2001, the Planning Commission of the City of Banning took evidence and took evidence and heard testimony in the matter of the grant of Conditional Use Permits 01-803 through 01-806 and based thereon denied each such conditional use permit; and
WHEREAS, thereafter applicant Martin Communications submitted timely notice of appeal of the matter to be heard by the City Council; and WHEREAS, at its meeting of October 9, 2001, the City Council conducted a de novo hearing of the appeal and took evidence and heard testimony; and WHEREAS, Banning Ordinance Code Section 9116.13 (B) requires that the City Council shall announce its findings and decision by formal resolution.

NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved that the City Council does find and conclude as follows:

Section 1.

Regarding Conditional Use Permits 01-803 through 01-806:

A. Findings of Fact:

1. That in 1993, the City of Banning permitted the remodeling of a billboard within the railroad right- way, of-thus making the factual determination that the railroad right- wayof-is an M1 zone.

2. That the zoning map Exhibit #2 provided by Martin Communications indicates that the area M1 designated on that map can be viewed as extending all the way to Highland Springs Avenue.

3. That there are existing billboards within the area designated in number 2 above that would have had to have some kind of clearance to be built.

B. Conclusions:

The issuance of a conditional use permit is consistent with the provisions of an adequate general plan. The issuance of such a permit is not ultra vires and is valid in that the general plan is adequate and conforms to the Rcso. 2001-I11 Martin Cup Findings ]
644

10. mandatory statutory criteria which are relevant to the uses sought by the permit;
The subject applications incorporate properties that are zoned C-M or M, the zoning designations within the City that currently list billboard structures as possible land uses subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit;
The Circulation Element of the City'sGeneral Plan depicts the subject properties on which the billboard structures are proposed to be located as "railroads"; the "railroads" designation of the City's Circulation Element contains provisions that allow billboard structures;
The Land Use Element of the City's General Plan depicts a land use designation for the railroads that traverse the City as right- wayof-for railroads;
Appendix " A" (Zoning) of the Banning Ordinance Code contains provisions that address railroads in terms of assigning a zoning classification and/or that outlines allowable land uses within a zone district or areas designated "railroads" in the City's Circulation Element; California State Law requires that zoning conform to a City's General
Plan and that the approval of any discretionary permits including Conditional Use Permits conform to zoning and the provisions of the City's
General Plan;
Because the City has a General Plan designation for the railroads that traverse the City as right- wayof-for trains, it can approve the subject Conditional Use Permits because it can make the finding that the use is consistent with the City's
General Plan;
For the reasons outlined in subnumerals 1 through 7, the City Council overrules the Planning Commission's determination of denial on the basis that the subject Conditional Use Permits and the proposed placement of billboard structures is not permitted by zoning and would therefore be inconsistent with the City'sGeneral Plan.

The proposed use is permitted subject to a conditional use permit within the proposed land use district and therefore complies with all of the applicable provisions of the Banning Ordinance Code;
The proposed use would not impair the integrity and character of the land use district in which it is to be located;
Reso. 2001-111 Martin Cup Findings 2
645
646
647

PRODUCTION RESOLUTION

MECHANICAL SPECIFICATIONS

MATERIAL, SUBSTRATE, INK & WARRANTIES

DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS
| LAMAR ADVERTISING COMPANY | lamar.com
Live (visible) area: 10’6” (h) x 36’0” (w), Finished size: 11‘6” (h) x 37’0” (w) If you prefer to download a template in .PDF or .TIFF format, go to: LamarGraphics.com > Templates > Print Templates.

PRODUCTION FACILITY SPECIFICATIONS
Material/Substrate:
7 ounce PVC Vinyl Flex
Up to 2 years posting
Minimum Warranty:

One year warranty protects against ink fade, ink
adhesion, and failure of material or pockets. Note: 12
ounce material is not preferred, but will be accepted
at this time.

Inks:

Inks must be weatherproof/waterproof with suicient
UV protection to meet the warranty term associated
with the aforementioned product line, specifications
or the substrate manufacturer.

Compatible Software:

Adobe Photoshop, Illustrator, or InDesign*
Acceptable Formats:

Native formats from the so
ware listed above or
.PDF, .TIFF, or .EPS
*Embed images and fonts when applicable or convert
fonts to outlines.

Updated 5/2025
10’6” (h) x 36’0” (w) BULLETIN SPEC SHEET
Lamar Bulletins are set up 1/2” = 1’ scale @ 300ppi
document resolution in CMYK color mode. This equates
to about 12.5 pixels per linear inch on the final product.

Set up your design file to the dimensions below:

ART SPECIFICATIONS
Live area document size: 5.25” (h) x 18.0“ (w)
Overall area document size: 5.75” (h) x 18.5“ (w)
The vinyl size should include 6” (physical size) of bleed on all 4 sides making the overall size of the vinyl 1’
larger in both height and width.

Lamar requires a 3" minimum mechanical pocket on
the back of the vinyl for installation. This does not
change the overall size of the vinyl.

ACCEPTED FILE TYPES

MATERIAL, SUBSTRATE, INKS & WARRANTIES
The live area represents the face of the panel. This is where all important text and images should appear.

Keep all critical elements away from the edge.

The overall area includes necessary bleed (0.5”) and
will be used to wrap around the panel. Fill the overall area with the same color as your background for best
results.
648

CITY OF BANNING

STAFF REPORT
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Elizabeth Gibbs, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Elizabeth Gibbs, City Manager
MEETING DATE: May 12, 2026
SUBJECT: Discussion and direction to staff on a draft Social Media Policy RECOMMENDATION:

Discuss the draft social media policy as presented and provide direction to staff on any changes to the policy.

BACKGROUND:

Social media has become a primary channel through which local governments communicate with residents, disseminate public information, and engage the broader community. Platforms such as Facebook, X (formerly Twitter), Instagram, and YouTube offer municipalities an efficient, cost-effective means to share announcements, promote events, and respond to community inquiries in real time.

The City of Banning currently maintains a presence on several social media platforms to promote City services and provide timely public information. However, the City has not historically operated under a formal adopted, comprehensive policy governing the use of those platforms-either by City staff posting on behalf of the City, or by members of the public engaging with City-managed accounts.

The absence of a formal policy has created operational uncertainty regarding content moderation standards, account management authority, compliance with the Ralph M. Brown Act, California Public Records Act ("PRA") obligations, and the legal boundaries surrounding restricted speech on limited public forums. Courts, including the Ninth Circuit and the United States Supreme Court, have increasingly scrutinized municipal social media practices, particularly regarding content-based restrictions and the blocking of users. The adopted policy provides clear, viewpoint-neutral standards that align with applicable constitutional and statutory requirements.

The proposed Social Media Policy was developed by the City Attorney in coordination with the City Manager. It establishes a governance framework that addresses City-posted content, employee and official use, public engagement standards, content moderation criteria, Brown Act compliance, and public records considerations.

JUSTIFICATION:

Adoption of a formal Social Media Policy is warranted for the following reasons:

Legal Compliance and Risk Mitigation - municipal social media accounts that are open to public comment are increasingly treated as public forums subject to First Amendment protections. Without clear, consistently applied content standards, the City is exposed to claims of viewpoint discrimination and civil liability. The proposed Policy establishes the City's social media sites as "limited public forums" and sets forth content-neutral moderation criteria, consistent with the legal standards articulated by the 649
courts. The Policy also addresses Brown Act compliance obligations for members of City legislative bodies, reducing the risk of inadvertent serial meeting violations through social media interaction.

Operational Clarity and Accountability - The Policy designates the City Manager or authorized designee as the administrator of all City social media accounts and establishes a clear chain of authority for account creation, content publication, and moderation. This reduces the risk of unauthorized postings, ensures consistency in messaging, and protects the City's official communications from reputational harm.

Public Records Act Compliance - Content posted on City social media platforms may constitute a public record subject to disclosure under the California PRA. The Policy explicitly notifies users and City representatives of this obligation and establishes that communications through social media do not constitute official or legal notice to the City, ensuring residents utilize proper channels for time-sensitive matters.

Employee and Official Guidance - The Policy provides City employees, elected officials, and members of City boards and commissions with clear guidance regarding personal social media use involving City business, confidentiality obligations, and the prohibition on using City branding without authorization.

This reduces ambiguity and supports consistent professional conduct.

Community Engagement Standards - The Policy establishes transparent, publicly available standards governing what content may be posted by the public on City-managed accounts, and the conditions under which content may be removed. This supports constructive, respectful community engagement while protecting the operational integrity of the City's communications platforms.

Comparator agencies throughout the Inland Empire and California have adopted similar social media policies as a municipal best practice. Adoption of this policy positions the City of Banning in alignment with those standards and reflects the City's commitment to transparent, lawful, and effective governance.

FISCAL IMPACT:

This item is for discussion and direction only. Adoption and implementation of the Social Media Policy is not anticipated to result in any direct fiscal impact to the City.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Draft - Banning_-_Social_Media_Policy_-_05.12.2026.pdf 650
1 CITY OF BANNING

SOCIAL MEDIA POLICY
I. PURPOSE.

1. The purpose of the City of Banning, California (“City”) Social Media Policy (“Policy”) is to disseminate information by way of social media to community members about the City’s mission, meetings, services, events, and activities. The City’s intended use of its social media sites is solely to address matters of City business. The City has an overriding interest and expectation in deciding what is posted or communicated on behalf of the City on City-managed social media. Questions, comments, and concerns about City business are welcomed and encouraged; however, City social media sites are not general public forums. City social media sites are intended to operate as limited public forums for the purpose of discussing matters related to City business, and content will be moderated in a viewpoint-neutral manner consistent with this Policy.

Nothing in this Policy is intended to restrict lawful speech based on viewpoint, and moderation decisions will be based on the content standards stated in this Policy and applied consistently.

2. This Policy establishes guidelines for community members to interact with the City through City-managed social media sites (e.g., websites, Facebook, X/Twitter, Instagram, YouTube, etc.) regarding City business. These guidelines also apply to City employees, officials, and representatives who use City-managed social media sites to further the business of the City.

3. The City requests that posts and comments on City social media sites be courteous, professional, and respectful. By posting, commenting on, or using City social media sites or platforms, users agree to abide by this Policy.

II. DEFINITIONS.

1. “Social media” means, but is not exclusive to, websites and internet-based applications where user-created content exists electronically, including but not limited to X/Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, Instagram, YouTube, and similar platforms.

2. “City social media site” means an internet site, page, location, or other means for collection of digital information on a social media platform over which the City controls its postings, except for advertisements or hyperlinks by the platform’s owners, vendors, or partners.

3. “City post” or “City postings” mean information, articles, pictures, videos, or any other form of communication posted by the City on a City social media site. 651
2 4. “City Legislative Bodies” means members of the City Council, Planning Commission, and any other board, commission, or committee of the City that are subject to the Ralph M. Brown Act.

5. “Post” or “Posting” mean information, articles, pictures, videos, or any other form of communication posted by the City or a user on a City social media site.

III. GENERAL POLICY.

1. By posting or commenting on any social media platform used by the City of Banning, you participate by your own choice, taking personal responsibility for your comments, your username and any information you provide therein. You further agree to the terms set forth in this policy. These guidelines will be displayed to users or made available by hyperlink on the City’s website and social media sites.

2. The City reserves the right, in its sole and absolute discretion, to remove any City post and to terminate any City social media site at any time without notice.

3. All posts on the City’s social media sites shall adhere to applicable federal, state, and local laws, regulations, and City policies.

4. The City may remove any content or post that violates this Policy or applicable law.

5. The City may remove any posts or comments not related to City business or not within the City’s subject matter jurisdiction.

6. The City reserves the right, without prior notice, to deny access to City social media sites to individuals who violate this Policy.

7. Users who repeatedly violate this Policy may be temporarily restricted or blocked only to the extent necessary to prevent continued violations of this Policy and such action will be viewpoint-neutral.

8. Content on City social media sites is subject to the California Public Records Act (“PRA”). Any content or posts on a City social media site, may be a public record subject to public disclosure or discovery in litigation.

9. This Policy may be revised at any time in the City’s sole and absolute discretion. 652
3 10. Use of social media by City employees that affects productivity or results in any cost, charge, or loss to the City is prohibited and may result in discipline.

11. Communications made through City social media sites shall not constitute legal or official notice to the City for any purpose. Individuals seeking to provide legal notice must do so through official channels as required by law.

12. City social media sites are not monitored on a continuous basis and are not intended for reporting emergencies, crimes, or time-sensitive matters. Users should not use City social media sites to request emergency assistance or to report criminal activity. In the event of an emergency, call 9-1-1. For non-emergency matters, service requests, or to provide official notice to the City, individuals should contact the City through appropriate official channels, including the City’s website, departments, or by telephone. Posts or messages submitted through social media will not be treated as formal requests for service or as providing legal notice to the City.

IV. CONTENT MANAGEMENT.

1. City Social Media Sites. City social media sites shall be managed and moderated by the City Manager or designee. The City Manager or designee shall determine which employees are authorized users of City social media accounts and shall maintain administrative control over account access credentials. Establishment of City social media sites requires prior approval of the City Manager or designee. All posts, comments, and any additional interactions will be monitored.

2. City-Posted Content. All posts on behalf of the City shall be made only by the City Manager or authorized designee(s). City’s posts on its social media sites will supplement and not replace the City’s required notices and standard methods of communication. The City’s official website, www.banningca.gov, is and will remain the primary source of City-related notices, information and news. Whenever possible, content posted on the City’s social media sites will also be available on the City’s website. The information posted by the City to City’s social media sites must:
a. Directly pertain to City business or City-sponsored programs, services, or events. b. Contain publicly available information that is not confidential or privileged from disclosure as defined by any local, state or federal law, or City policy including but not limited to excluding content related to pending litigation, personnel matters, active investigations, or emergency operations unless expressly authorized. c. Comply with all applicable local, federal, and state laws, including the Brown Act.
653
4 d. Not include content that is contrary or detrimental to the City’s mission. e. Not contain messages that endorse, promote, or oppose any religion or religious beliefs.
f. Not encourage illegal activity.
g. Not contain any personal information that would violate any legally protected right to privacy.
h. Not endorse, promote, or oppose political candidates, parties, or ballot measures. i. Not contain any profane, obscene or pornographic language or content or links to such language or content.
j. Not contain content that promotes, fosters, or perpetrates discrimination based on race, color, creed, sex, gender, age, religion, national origin or ancestry, physical or mental disability, veteran status, parentage, marital status, status with regards to public assistance, medical condition, sexual identity, sexual orientation, or any other category protected by federal, state or local laws. k. Not contain solicitations of commerce or advertisement of any private business, product, or commercial activity.

3. Personal social media use. City employees, officials, and members of City Legislative Bodies with personal social media accounts that post or comment on social media about official City business should:
a. State their name; and
b. Use a disclaimer such as “The postings on this site are my own and do not reflect the views of the City of Banning.”
City employees, officials and members of City Legislative Bodies (collectively “City Representatives”) are advised that communications related to City business made on personal devices or accounts may be subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act.

4. Posts are public. City Representatives should know that posts about City issues that include or relate to employment complaints or human resources concerns may not be 654
5 protected. Employees and representatives should be mindful of the distinction between sharing personal and agency view.

5. Confidential information. City Representatives shall not directly or indirectly disclose City confidential, privileged or proprietary information nor shall they disclose confidential, private or proprietary information about City residents, vendors, suppliers or partners.

6. Media inquiries. All media inquiries related to City social media shall be referred to the City Manager or designee.

7. Compliance with applicable laws. Use of City’s social media sites shall be in compliance with all applicable laws, including the Ralph M. Brown Act (“Brown Act”). Members of City Legislative Bodies shall not repost, “like,” retweet or in any way respond to or comment upon posts by other members of City Legislative Bodies where such posts relate to City business or matters within the City’s subject matter jurisdiction as such activity may result in a violation of the Brown Act including activity on both public and private social media platforms, which may constitute a “serial meeting” under the Brown Act. In order to assure compliance with the Brown Act, members of City Legislative Bodies should identify themselves as such when posting a comment on City social media sites. Members of City Legislative Bodies should not use City social media sites to blog or engage in serial meetings, or otherwise discuss, deliberate or express opinions on any issues within the subject matter jurisdiction of the City as doing so could result in a Brown Act violation. City Representatives should avoid using City-managed social media comment threads to conduct serial discussions or deliberations outside of duly noticed public meetings. City staff shall not facilitate such discussions through prompting, selective engagement, or by encouraging responses that could result in a quorum of a legislative body participating in a discussion. When feasible, the City may disable or limit comments on posts that are reasonably anticipated to invite real-time discussion or deliberation among a quorum of members of a City Legislative Body regarding matters within the City’s subject matter jurisdiction. City Representatives are expected to demonstrate the highest standards of personal integrity, honesty and conduct in all activities in order to inspire public confidence and trust in the City.

8. Discipline for violations. City employees that post content in violation of this Policy may be subject to disciplinary action.

9. Free speech. Nothing in this Policy is intended to restrict or limit City employees’ right to free speech or rights to engage in protected concerted activity under applicable law.

10. Posts in private capacity. Activity of City Representatives on social media sites outside of work must not be attributable to the City or the representative/employee’s job function at the City. Examples include the following:
655
6 a. City Representatives should not use their City e-mail address to register for social media and other sites unless authorized by the City to do so and where the purpose is directly related to their job and/or official City duties.
b. City Representatives should not display the City’s logos, emblems, or patches on personal social networking accounts.
c. City Representatives should not state or imply that they speak for the City, or for City officials unless expressly authorized by the City to do so.

11. Externally posted content. Posts by members of the public (including comments, photos, and links) on City sites containing any of the following are not permitted and, to the extent allowed by law, may be removed by the City from its social media sites:
a. Profane, obscene or pornographic language or content or links to such language or content.
b. Solicitations of commerce, including but not limited to advertising of any business, product, or commercial activity.
c. Content that conducts or encourages illegal activity. d. Information that is illegal to disseminate or that might compromise the safety or security of the public or public systems.
e. Content that violates another party’s legal ownership interest, such as copyright or trademark.
f. Content that the City reasonably believes constitutes unlawful defamation or false statements of fact that are not protected speech, as determined under applicable law.
g. Threats of violence or injury to any person, property, or organization. h. Content that violates any federal, state, or local law. i. Content that promotes, fosters, or perpetuates discrimination based on race, color, creed, sex, gender, age, religion, national origin or ancestry, physical or mental disability, veteran status, parentage, marital status, status with regard to 656
7 public assistance, medical condition, sexual identity, sexual orientation, or any other category protected by federal, state, or local laws. j. Comments that contain spam or include links to other sites. k. Harassment, stalking, or content intended to intimidate any individual or group.
l. Repetitive or duplicative comments that disrupt discussion. “Duplicate posts” include repetitive posting that substantially disrupts the comment thread or constitutes spam (including repeated identical or near-identical comments). m. Content that interferes with public safety operations or investigations.

The City will not remove content solely because it is critical of the City, its officials, or its policies.

12. Disclaimer. The City is not responsible for, and neither endorses nor opposes, the opinions or comments placed on City social media sites by visitors or third parties. The City further disclaims any and all responsibility or liability for any posts/content that cannot lawfully be removed or for posts/content that the City deems inappropriate for posting but which cannot be or are not removed expeditiously. Publication of third-party content does not imply endorsement, approval, or agreement by the City.

13. No expectation of privacy. Given that posts on City social media sites are publicly viewable and available, users, posters, and City Representatives do not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in content posted to City social media sites.

14. Intellectual property. Use of the City’s logo, trademarks, intellectual property, proprietary graphics, or photographs without the City’s written permission is strictly prohibited.

15. Indemnity. By posting content, a user agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officials, officers, directors and employees, against any damages, losses, liabilities, judgments, causes of action, costs or expenses (including reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs) arising out of any claim relating to any material user has posted on any City-managed social media.

16. Terms of use policies. All comments posted to City social media sites are also bound by the platform or host’s specific use policy. The City reserves the right to report any violation of a social media host’s use policy with the intent of taking appropriate and reasonable responsive action including, but not limited to, Facebook Community Standards, X Rules, YouTube Community Guidelines, and Instagram Community Guidelines. 657
8 17. Questions. Questions regarding City social media may be directed to City of Banning (951) 922-3100 or email: [email protected].

V. CONCLUSION.

Social media is a 24/7 medium that operates continuously; however, the City’s ability to moderate content is not. The City may not detect every inappropriate comment immediately and must rely on the maturity of social media participants and the community to ignore false, misleading, inappropriate or harmful speech. The City disclaims any and all responsibility for any post/content the City has not expressly authorized and reserves the right to take reasonable and lawful action to maintain the intended purpose of its social media platforms.

Adopted: ________________, 2026
Approved By:
_____________________
658

CITY OF BANNING, CALIFORNIA
2026-2045 ELECTRIC SERVICE MASTER PLAN
APRIL 2026
Prepared by:

Finley Engineering Company, Inc.

On behalf of:

Banning Electric Utility
Contact Information:

Finley Engineering Company, Inc.

PO Box 148, 104 E. 11th Street
Lamar, MO 64795
(417) 682-5531
www.finleyusa.com
City of Banning
99 E. Ramsey Street
Banning, CA 92220
951.922.3100
www.banningca.gov
281 659

ENGINEERS CERTIFICATION
I, Christopher Adam Smart, P.E., herby certify that this 2026-2045 Electric Service Master Plan was prepared by me or under my direct Supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the state of California, license number E 25395.

X
282 660

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Contents Page

1.0 - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1-1

1.1 - Introduction 1-1

1.2 – Purpose of Study 1-1

1.3 - Existing System Review 1-1

1.3. - Total ESMP Cost Estimate 1-2

2.0 - SYSTEM PLANNING CRITERIA 2-1

2.1 – Distribution System Planning Criteria 2-1

2.1.1 – Distribution System Design Criteria 2-1

2.2 – Substation Planning Criteria 2-2

2.3 – Basis of Cost Estimates 2-2

3.0 - LOAD FORECAST 3-1

4.0 - LAND USE PROJECTION 4-1

5.0 - 5-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN (CIP) 5-1

5.1 - Executive Summary 5-5

5.1.1 - Introduction 5-5

5.1.2 - Purpose of Study 5-5

5.1.3 - General Conclusions and Recommendations 5-5

5.2 - Planning Criteria 5-7

5.2.1 - Distribution System 5-7

5.2.2 - Substation 5-8

5.2.3 - Basis of Cost Estimates 5-8

5.3 - System Forecast 5-11

5.4 - Overhead Maintenance Program 5-26

5.5 - Capital Maintenance Project 5-27

5.6 - Substation Capacity Analysis 5-46

5.7 - Distribution System Analysis 5-47

5.8 - Total 5-Year CIP Cost Estimate 5-75

6.0 - 15-Year ESMP 6-1

6.1 - Overhead Maintenance Program 6-1

6.2 - Capital Maintenance Projects 6-3

6.3 - Substation Capacity Analysis 6-4

6.4 - Distribution System Analysis 6-5

6.5 - Total 15-Year ESMP Cost Estimate 6-37

7.0 - Electric Service Master Plan (ESMP) Summary 7-1

7.1 - Total Overhead Maintenance Program 7-1

7.2 - Total Capital Maintenance Projects 7-1

7.3 - Total Distribution System Improvement Projects 7-1

7.4 - Total ESMP Cost Estimate 7-2
283 661

TABLE OF CONTENTS
List of Table, Charts, and Images Page
Table 1.4-1 – Total ESMP Cost Estimate 1-2
Table 2.3-1 – Conductor Material Cost 2-2
Table 2.3-2 – Pole Material Cost 2-2
Table 2.3-3 – Transformer Material Cost 2-3
Table 2.3-4 – Framing Units Material Cost 2-3
Table 2.3-5 – Underground Material Cost 2-4
Table 2.3-6 – Overhead Construction Labor and Fleet Cost 2-4 Table 2.3-7 – Underground Construction Labor and Fleet Cost 2-4 Banning Electric Utility Demand Forecast Table 3-2
Banning Electric Utility Non-Coincident System Peak Forecast Chart 3-3 Banning Electric Utility Coincident System Forecast Chart 3-4 Conceptual Banning Electric Utility Coincident System Forecast Chart 3-5 Banning Electric Utility MWH Purchases Chart 3-9
San Gorgonio Total kW Demand Chart 3-10
Midway Total kW Demand Chart 3-11
22nd Street Total kW Demand Chart 3-12
Stagecoach Total kW Demand Chart 3-13
Ivy Total kW Demand Chart 3-14
Sunset Total kW Demand Chart 3-15
Table 4.0-1 – Current Developments 4-1
Table 4.0-2 – Future Developments 4-1
5-Year CIP Table of Contents 5-3
Table 5.2.3-1 – Conductor Material Cost 5-8
Table 5.2.3-2 Pole Material Cost 5-8
Table 5.2.3-3 Transformer Material Cost 5-9
Table 5.2.3-4 Framing Units Material Cost 5-9
Table 5.2.3-5 Underground Material Cost 5-10
Table 5.2.3-6 Overhead Construction Labor and Fleet Cost 5-10 Table 5.2.3-7 Underground Construction Labor and Fleet Cost 5-10 Banning Electric Utility Demand Forecast Table 5-12
Banning Electric Utility Non-Coincident System Peak Forecast Chart 5-13 Banning Electric Utility Coincident System Forecast Chart 5-14 Conceptual Banning Electric Utility Coincident System Forecast Chart 5-15 Banning Electric Utility MWH Purchases Chart 5-19
San Gorgonio Total kW Demand Chart 5-20
Midway Total kW Demand Chart 5-21
22nd Street Total kW Demand Chart 5-22
Stagecoach Total kW Demand Chart 5-23
Ivy Total kW Demand Chart 5-24
Sunset Total kW Demand Chart 5-25
Table 5.4-1 – Overhead Maintenance Program Costs 5-26
Table 5.5-1 – Capital Maintenance Project Costs 5-27
Table 5.6-1 – Substation Capacity Analysis 5-46
284 662

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Image 5.7-1 – CIP Project 1 5-48
Image 5.7-2 – CIP Project 2 5-49
Image 5.7-3 – CIP Project 3 5-50
Image 5.7-4 – CIP Project 4 5-51
Image 5.7-5 – CIP Project 5 5-52
Image 5.7-6 – CIP Project 6 5-53
Image 5.7-7 – CIP Project 7 5-54
Image 5.7-8 – CIP Project 8 5-55
Image 5.7-9 – CIP Project 9 5-56
Image 5.7-10 – CIP Project 10 5-57
Image 5.7-11 – CIP Project 11 5-58
Image 5.7-12 – CIP Project 12 5-59
Image 5.7-13 – CIP Project 13 5-60
Image 5.7-14 – CIP Project 14 5-61
Image 5.7-15 – CIP Project 15 5-62
Image 5.7-16 – CIP Project 16 5-63
Image 5.7-17 – CIP Project 17 5-64
Image 5.7-18 – CIP Project 18 5-65
Image 5.7-19 – CIP Project 19 5-66
Image 5.7-20 – CIP Project 20 5-67
Image 5.7-21 – CIP Project 21 5-68
Image 5.7-22 – CIP Project 22 5-69
Image 5.7-23 – CIP Project 23 5-70
Image 5.7-24 – CIP Project 24 5-71
Image 5.7-25 – CIP Project 25 5-72
Image 5.7-26 – CIP Project 26 5-73
Image 5.7-27 – CIP Project 27 5-74
Table 5.8-1 – Total 5-Year CIP Cost Estimate 5-75
Table 6.1-1 – Overhead Maintenance Program Costs 2031 thru 2035 6-1 Table 6.1-2 – Overhead Maintenance Program Costs 2036 thru 2040 6-2 Table 6.1-3 – Overhead Maintenance Program Costs 2041 thru 2045 6-2 Table 6.2-1 – Capital Maintenance Project Costs 6-3
Table 6.3-1 – Substation Capacity Analysis 6-4
Image 6.4-1 – ESMP Project 1 6-6
Image 6.4-2 – ESMP Project 2 6-7
Image 6.4-3 – ESMP Project 3 6-8
Image 6.4-4 – ESMP Project 4 6-9
Image 6.4-5 – ESMP Project 5 6-10
Image 6.4-6 – ESMP Project 6 6-11
Image 6.4-7 – ESMP Project 7 6-12
Image 6.4-8 – ESMP Project 8 6-13
Image 6.4-9 – ESMP Project 9 6-14
Image 6.4-10 – ESMP Project 10 6-15
Image 6.4-11 – ESMP Project 11 6-16
285 663

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Image 6.4-12 – ESMP Project 12 6-17
Image 6.4-13 – ESMP Project 13 6-18
Image 6.4-14 – ESMP Project 14 6-19
Image 6.4-15 – ESMP Project 15 6-20
Image 6.4-16 – ESMP Project 16 6-21
Image 6.4-17 – ESMP Project 17 6-22
Image 6.4-18 – ESMP Project 18 6-23
Image 6.4-19 – ESMP Project 19 6-24
Image 6.4-20 – Feeder Plan for CKT’s 75, 76, and 78 6-25 Image 6.4-21 – ESMP Project 20 6-26
Image 6.4-22 – ESMP Project 21 6-27
Image 6.4-23 – ESMP Project 22 6-28
Image 6.4-24 – ESMP Project 23 6-29
Image 6.4-25 – ESMP Project 24 6-30
Image 6.4-26 – ESMP Project 25 6-31
Image 6.4-27 – ESMP Project 26 6-32
Image 6.4-28 – ESMP Project 27 6-33
Image 6.4-29 – ESMP Project 28 6-34
Image 6.4-30 – ESMP Project 29 6-35
Image 6.4-31 – ESMP Project 30 6-36
Image 6.1-32 – Smith Creek Feeder Plan 6-36
Table 6.5-1 – 15-Year ESMP Cost Estimate (2031-2035) 6-37 Table 6.5-1 – 15-Year ESMP Cost Estimate (2036-2040) 6-38 Table 6.5-1 – 15-Year ESMP Cost Estimate (2040-2045) 6-39 Table 7.4-1 – 2026-2045 ESMP Cost Estimate 7-2
286 664

CITY OF BANNING ELECTRIC UTILITY
2026-2045 ELECTRIC SERVICE MASTER PLAN

1.0 - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

1.1 - Introduction
The City of Banning owns the utility that provides electric service to Banning, California and the electric utility is maintained by Banning Electric Utility (BEU). Originally established in 1913 as a private utility, the City of Banning purchased the electric utility in 1922 and has been providing electric service to its residents since that time. Banning’s energy resource base includes portions of nuclear, geothermal, solar, landfill gas-to-energy, and hydro generating plants, that provide the majority of electricity required to meet the system peak demand.

Through an agreement with Southern California Edison Company (SCE), the BEU system utilizes SCE’s transmission system in bringing power from the California Independent System Operator (“CAISO”) controlled high voltage transmission grid to the BEU distribution system at the Banning Substation.

The City of Banning supports clean-energy and is committed to additional renewable energy resources to its already diverse portfolio. BEU has met and/or exceeded the renewable energy requirements of Compliance Period #1, Compliance Period #2, and Compliance Period #3 of the State’s Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS) program. The Utility was 81 percent renewable in 2022, already exceeding the current State mandate of 60 percent by 2030.

BEU is a member of the Southern California Public Power Authority (SCPPA) enjoying the benefits of joint action through cost effective planning, construction, management, and operations of electrical energy resources.

1.2 - Purpose of Study
This Electric Service Master Plan (ESMP) is a report prepared by Finley Engineering Company, Inc. (FEC) based on an analysis and review of the historical system growth and operation to determine projections of future growth, recommendations for capital improvements, and scheduled system maintenance that will insure the continued economical and reliable operation of the system over the ensuing 20-year period.

The analysis was completed in two parts. The first 5-year analysis was completed as the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) and includes projects and recommendations determined from the analysis, Capital Improvements specified by BEU, and Capital Maintenance also specified by BEU. This CIP will be presented to the City Council as the actual construction plan for the next 5 years. The 15 year ESMP analysis was completed as a guideline for determining the future system performance and improving system capacity for expansion.

1.3 – Existing System Review
BEU maintains three, 34.5 kV sub-transmission circuits totaling approximately eighteen miles which feed six distribution substations.

These six distribution substations have approximately 27 circuits feeding 147 miles of overhead and underground distribution line with an operating voltage of 7.2/12.5 kV. An estimated 47% of the total distribution line is underground.
1-1
287 665

CITY OF BANNING ELECTRIC UTILITY
2026-2045 ELECTRIC SERVICE MASTER PLAN
Along these distribution lines, BEU serves approximately 15,570 consumer meters. In 2024, the BEU system experienced a coincident summer peak demand of 55.1 MW and a winter peak demand of 22.3 MW. Historically, the BEU system is a summer peaking system with the summer peak more than double the winter peak. Also in 2024, BEU purchased approximately 157,000 MWH’s through its portfolio of long-term power purchase agreements as well as purchases from the CAISO wholesale markets, distributed among the membership of Residential, Small Commercial, Medium Commercial, Industrial, Security Lighting, Street Lighting, and Well Service customers.

1.4 – Total ESMP Cost Estimate
Table 1.4-1 – Total ESMP Cost Estimate
2026-2045 Electric Service Master Plan
5-year CIP 15-Year ESMP Totals
OH Maintenance Program
Total Cost $4,058,438 $23,968,742 $28,027,180
CIAC $0 $0 $0
BEU Funding Cost $4,058,438 $23,968,742 $28,027,180
Capital-Maintenance Projects
Total Cost $20,784,500 $8,350,000 $29,134,500
CIAC $9,293,750 $3,000,000 $12,293,750
BEU Funding Cost $11,490,750 $5,350,000 $16,840,750
System Improvement Projects
Total Cost $2,805,700 $11,539,300 $14,345,000
CIAC $0 $0 $0
BEU Funding Cost $2,805,700 $11,539,300 $14,345,000
Total ESMP Cost
Total Cost $27,648,638 $43,858,042 $71,506,680
CIAC $9,293,750 $3,000,000 $12,293,750
BEU Funding Cost $18,354,888 $40,858,042 $59,212,930
Of the total cost, 47% is for the OH Maintenance Program, 28% is for Capital Maintenance Projects, and 24% is for System Improvement Projects.
1-2
288 666

CITY OF BANNING ELECTRIC UTILITY
2026-2045 ELECTRIC SERVICE MASTER PLAN

2.0 – SYSTEM PLANNING CRITERIA

2.1 - Distribution System Planning Criteria
The distribution projects contained in this ESMP are recommended based upon the following planning criteria.
a. With an assumed delivered voltage of 125 volts (1.041 per unit on a 120 volt base) during peak load conditions, the design minimum allowable voltage at the primary terminals of any distribution transformer shall be 118 volts (0.98 per unit on a 120 volt base). b. Voltage regulators and step transformers will be upgraded when projected peak loads exceed 85% of the device’s rating.
c. Sectionalizing devices will be upgraded when projected peak loads exceed 70% of the device’s continuous current rating.
d. Primary conductors on the 7.2/12.5 kV and below distribution system will be upgraded when projected peak loads exceed 60% of the conductor’s thermal rating and may be subject to upgrade before this time if anticipated load growth may potentially exceed 60% of the conductor’s thermal rating
e. Primary conductors on the 34.5 kV sub-transmission system will be upgraded when projected peak loads exceed 90% of the conductor’s thermal rating and may be subject to upgrade before this time if anticipated load growth may potentially exceed 90% of the conductor’s thermal rating
f. Single-phase primary voltage lines will be limited to 35 amps maximum loading. g. The power factor at the delivery point under peak loading conditions is desired to be no less than 95%. The off-peak power factor should preferably be maintained between 95% lagging and 95% leading. This criterion is subject to the cost of the installation of capacitors, switches, and controls vs. the cost of kilowatt (kW) loss reduction.

2.1.1 - Distribution System Design Criteria
The following design criteria was considered when determining projects contained in this ESMP. a. Feeder current balance will be maintained at plus or minus 20% of the average per phase loading during peak conditions. This criterion may be relaxed in areas where it could impose unnecessary or premature costs.
b. Conductor sizes will be economically sized but may be modified to conform to BEU’s standard conductor sizes.
c. Load switching and backfeeding will be considered to defer unnecessary or premature costs to correct any load voltage or high conductor loading. d. Load switching and backfeeding will be considered to defer unnecessary or premature costs to correct any high single-phase loading. For areas where there is no backfeed or load switch solution, additional conductors will be added to allow for phase balancing. 2-1
289 667

CITY OF BANNING ELECTRIC UTILITY
2026-2045 ELECTRIC SERVICE MASTER PLAN
e. Relocation of existing line sections will be considered where inaccessibility impedes the maintenance of line sections or jeopardizes the service or reliability of line sections.

2.2 – Substation Planning Criteria
The substation projects contained in this ESMP are recommended based upon the following planning criteria.
a. Substation transformers will limited to 95% of the max kVA rating of the transformer. The following improvements will be considered in the event the load exceeds 95% of the max kVA rating:
a. Load switching to adjacent substations
b. Upgrade of existing transformer
c. Installation of an additional transformer in the existing substation d. Construction of a new substation

2.3 – Basis of Cost Estimates
The following tables for material and labor costs were used to determine system improvement project costs. The costs were taken from actual prices provided by BEU as well as prices received by FEC from other sources.

Table 2.3-1 Conductor Material Cost
Conductor (price per foot)
OH Conductor UG Conductor
#2 Copper $1.31 1/0 AL, 15 kV $2.03
#2 ACSR $0.26 1/0 CU, 15 kV $10.98
#4 ACSR $0.15 1/0 CU, 35 kV $8.47
1/0 ACSR $0.30 4/0 CU $6.95
4/0 Copper $3.11 4/0 AL $4.97
4/0 ACSR $0.80 350 CU $7.53
336 ACSR $1.62 750 AL $13.38
Table 2.3-2 Pole Material Cost
Pole Price per unit Pole Price per unit
35' Douglas Fir, H2 $1,269.30 35’ Wood, Class 2 $1,067.38 40’ Wood, Class 2 $766.35
45' Douglas Fir, H2 $1,771.08 45’ Wood, Class 2 $953.80 50’ Wood, Class 2 $1,135.73
55' Douglas Fir, H2 $2,889.48 55’ Wood, Class 2 $918.72 60' Douglas Fir, H2 $2,945.89 60’ Wood, Class 2 $1,362.29 2-2
290 668

CITY OF BANNING ELECTRIC UTILITY
2026-2045 ELECTRIC SERVICE MASTER PLAN
Table 2.3-3 Transformer Material Cost
Transformer Price per unit
10 kVA O.H. Transformer S-Type 7,200 $500.00
15 kVA 7,200, 120/240 DV S-Type $645.42
25 kVA 7,200, 120/240 DV S-Type $919.16
37 kVA 7,200, 120/240 DV S-Type $1,496.65
50 kVA 7,200 120/240 $3,992.05
75 kVA 3Ø 12,470/7,200 120/208 $6,023.22
300 kVA DV $8,583.61
750 kVA 3Ø 12,470/7,200 $14,626.30
1,000 kVA 3Ø 12,470/7,200 DV $10,809.48
2,500 kVA 3Ø 12,470/7,200 277/480 $34,539.92
25 kVA 1Ø 12,470/7,200 120/240 Pdmnt $3,685.34

37.5 kVA 1Ø 12,400/7,200 DV Pdmnt $1,988.01
75 kVA 1Ø 12,470/7,200 120/240 Pdmnt $7,110.42
300 kVA 3Ø 12,470/4,160 DV Pdmnt 208/120 $13,547.15
500 kVA 3Ø Pdmnt $10,442.65
1,500 kVA DV 3Ø Pdmnt 277/480 $31,037.04
Table 2.3-4 Framing Units Material Cost
Framing Unit Price per unit
A1.3P $75.32
A1.11P $493.46
A5.2G $286.41
A3.1 $78.74
A6.21 $1,080.29
G1.2 $317.41
G1.2 $1,318.96
A5.1 $195.12
A5.21 $888.35
(A4.1) $255.90
G1.3 $433.79
G1.3 $1,127.02
C1.11 $628.33
C1.81G $1,592.53
C1.11,A5.21 $1,516.68
C5.82G $3,472.80
C3.1 $208.96
C3.1,A5.1 $404.08
C3.1,A5.21 $1,097.31
C3.1, C5.1 $376.78
C5.1 $167.82
C5.1,A5.1 $362.94
C5.1,A5.21 $1,056.17
2-3
291 669

CITY OF BANNING ELECTRIC UTILITY
2026-2045 ELECTRIC SERVICE MASTER PLAN
Table 2.3-5 Underground Material Cost
Material Price per unit
Light Duty Secondary Box $78.42
Light Duty Secondary Lid $83.43
4" PVC SCH 40 (per foot) $1.69
1/0 AL U/G (per foot) $4.75
Service Entrance Sleeve $0.45
Deadend Shoe Small $8.58
Power Solve (Pulling Lube) $58.98
Table 2.3-6 Overhead Construction Labor and Fleet Cost
Units
(hr.)
Unit Cost
(per hr.)
Utility Bed P/U 1 ton (Foreman) (2 hrs. per connection) 4 $27.78 2 Person Lift (Bucket Truck) 55' (2 hrs. per connection) 2 $51.68 4 Person Crew 4 $466.73
3 Person Crew (2 hours per connection) 4 $352.02
2 Person Crew 2 $237.31
Electrical Engineering Supervisor (0.5 hrs. per connection) 1 $125.98 Electric Service Planning Supervisor (0.5 hrs. per connection) 1 $127.97 GIS Technician (1 hr. per connection) 2 $59.21
For overhead line, project cost estimates are based on an average of construction 1 mile of line per month with average span lengths at 150’.

Table 2.3-7 Underground Construction Labor and Fleet Cost Labor Price per hr.
4 Person Line Crew $466.73
Powerline Crew Superintendent $135.93
Fleet Price per hr.

Dump Truck $55.98
Utility Bed P/U 1 ton (Foreman) (3) $27.78
Digger Derrick $48.77
Wire Puller $24.98
Reel Trailer $24.98
Backhoe $23.95
For underground line, project estimates are based on an average construction of 1 month to trench, lay conduit, pull wire and terminate, and backfill 300’.

Engineering (10%) and contingency (5%) were also added for each cost estimate. 2-4
292 670

CITY OF BANNING ELECTRIC UTILITY
2026-2045 ELECTRIC SERVICE MASTER PLAN

3.0 LOAD FORECAST
The demand forecast was prepared to project the summer and winter kW demand per substation area as well as the total system demand for the City of Banning for the 2026-2045 ESMP period.

The historical non-coincident substation demands as well as the historical coincident system demands were provided by BEU and used as the basis for the forecast. BEU also provided insight into new load additions that are in some sort of application or planning process and were used in the conceptual forecast.

Additional factors that were considered when reviewing the historical peaks include temporary load switching between substations, construction of new substations with permanent load switching, and removal and/or replacement of existing substations.

Along with new load additions, considerations were also made for the addition of EV chargers at new subdivision locations.

This forecast was used to run voltage drop and load flow analysis to determine system improvements required to reliably serve the City of Banning’s existing consumers and allow for future consumer growth.

It is projected that the BEU system will reach a non-coincident peak of 110,556 kW in the summer of 2045 and 81,410 kW in the winter of 2045. It is also projected that the BEU system will reach a coincident peak of 90,738 kW in the summer of 2045 and 75,580 kW in the winter of 2045.

A separate conceptual forecast was created to include new load additions that are in some state of application or planning process. It is projected that the BEU system will reach a conceptual non-coincident peak of 176,165 kW in the summer of 2045 and 161,007 kW in the winter of 2045.

As part of the historical review, MWH purchases were also reviewed and a forecast was determined. It is projected that the BEU system will have an annual coincident purchase of 272,571 MWH’s by 2045.

A graphical representation of the individual substation demand forecast as well as the total system coincident demand, non-coincident demand, conceptual non-coincident demand and MWH purchases is included following this page.
3-1
293 671

BANNING ELECTRIC UTILTIY
2026-2045 ESMP SYSTEM FORECAST
2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 2042 2043 2044 2045 San Gorgonio Total
S 16,425 17,079 16,472 9,131 4,958 16,500 16,830 17,167 17,510 17,860 18,217 18,582 18,953 19,332 19,719 20,113 20,516 20,926 21,345 21,771 22,207 22,651 23,104 23,566 24,037 24,518 2.0% W 15,022 12,746 11,267 7,193 3,739 15,000 15,300 15,606 15,918 16,236 16,561 16,892 17,230 17,575 17,926 18,285 18,651 19,024 19,404 19,792 20,188 20,592 21,004 21,424 21,852 22,289 2.0% Cannabis Cultivation 3,159 3,159 3,159 3,159 3,159 3,159 3,159 3,159 3,159 3,159 3,159 3,159 3,159 3,159 3,159 3,159 3,159 3,159 3,159 3,159 3,159 Yoshinoya 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 S 16,425 17,079 16,472 9,131 4,958 19,748 20,078 20,415 20,758 21,108 21,465 21,830 22,201 22,580 22,967 23,361 23,764 24,174 24,593 25,019 25,455 25,899 26,352 26,814 27,285 27,766 1.7% W 15,022 12,746 11,267 7,193 3,739 18,248 18,548 18,854 19,166 19,484 19,809 20,140 20,478 20,823 21,174 21,533 21,899 22,272 22,652 23,040 23,436 23,840 24,252 24,672 25,100 25,537 1.7% Midway Total
S 13,541 13,649 14,272 17,082 15,786 15,052 15,458 15,876 16,304 16,745 17,197 17,661 18,138 18,628 19,131 19,647 20,178 20,722 21,282 21,856 22,447 23,053 23,675 24,314 24,971 25,645 2.7% W 10,384 9,247 7,788 6,868 10,715 9,663 9,924 10,192 10,467 10,750 11,040 11,338 11,644 11,958 12,281 12,613 12,953 13,303 13,662 14,031 14,410 14,799 15,199 15,609 16,031 16,463 2.7% Airport
S 365 370 360 32 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0% W 389 389 280 23 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0% 22nd Street
S 10,233 10,319 9,736 10,585 11,240 10,670 10,787 10,906 11,026 11,147 11,270 11,394 11,519 11,646 11,774 11,904 12,034 12,167 12,301 12,436 12,573 12,711 12,851 12,992 13,135 13,280 1.1% W 8,140 6,529 6,105 6,567 8,018 8,210 8,300 8,392 8,484 8,577 8,672 8,767 8,863 8,961 9,059 9,159 9,260 9,362 9,465 9,569 9,674 9,781 9,888 9,997 10,107 10,218 1.1% Stagecoach
S 0 0 0 6,634 8,040 6,700 6,834 6,971 7,110 7,252 7,397 7,545 7,696 7,850 8,007 8,167 8,331 8,497 8,667 8,841 9,017 9,198 9,382 9,569 9,761 9,956 2.0% W 0 0 0 3,616 7,955 3,800 3,876 3,954 4,033 4,113 4,196 4,279 4,365 4,452 4,541 4,632 4,725 4,819 4,916 5,014 5,114 5,217 5,321 5,427 5,536 5,647 2.0% Ivy
S 0 0 5,308 7,206 8,333 5,400 5,508 5,618 5,731 5,845 5,962 6,081 6,203 6,327 6,453 6,583 6,714 6,849 6,985 7,125 7,268 7,413 7,561 7,713 7,867 8,024 2.0% W 0 0 4,493 4,890 6,235 4,500 4,590 4,682 4,775 4,871 4,968 5,068 5,169 5,272 5,378 5,485 5,595 5,707 5,821 5,938 6,056 6,178 6,301 6,427 6,556 6,687 2.0% Morongo Health Clinic 0 0 636 636 636 636 636 636 636 636 636 636 636 636 636 636 636 636 636 636 636 S 0 0 5,308 7,206 8,333 5,400 5,508 6,254 6,367 6,481 6,598 6,717 6,839 6,963 7,089 7,219 7,350 7,485 7,621 7,761 7,904 8,049 8,197 8,349 8,503 8,660 2.4% W 0 0 4,493 4,890 6,235 4,500 4,590 5,318 5,411 5,507 5,604 5,704 5,805 5,908 6,014 6,121 6,231 6,343 6,457 6,574 6,692 6,814 6,937 7,063 7,192 7,323 2.5% Sunset
S 8,140 8,099 9,586 11,441 14,821 10,439 10,857 11,291 11,742 12,212 12,701 13,209 13,737 14,286 14,858 15,452 16,070 16,713 17,382 18,077 18,800 19,552 20,334 21,147 21,993 22,873 4.0% W 6,716 5,803 5,037 8,299 11,443 6,319 6,572 6,835 7,108 7,392 7,688 7,996 8,315 8,648 8,994 9,354 9,728 10,117 10,522 10,942 11,380 11,835 12,309 12,801 13,313 13,846 4.0% Crestwood Communities 432 864 864 864 864 864 864 864 864 864 864 864 864 864 864 864 864 864 864 864 864 Vista Robles KB homes 0 1,512 1,512 1,512 1,512 1,512 1,512 1,512 1,512 1,512 1,512 1,512 1,512 1,512 1,512 1,512 1,512 1,512 1,512 1,512 1,512 S 8,140 8,099 9,586 11,441 14,821 10,871 13,233 13,667 14,118 14,588 15,077 15,585 16,113 16,662 17,234 17,828 18,446 19,089 19,758 20,453 21,176 21,928 22,710 23,523 24,369 25,249 4.3% W 6,716 5,803 5,037 8,299 11,443 6,751 8,948 9,211 9,484 9,768 10,064 10,372 10,691 11,024 11,370 11,730 12,104 12,493 12,898 13,318 13,756 14,211 14,685 15,177 15,689 16,222 4.5% Alola
S 2,929 2,370 1,646 372 0000000000000000000000 0.0%
W 2,377 708 782 336 0000000000000000000000 0.0%
Banning Electric Utility Non-Coincident System Peak Forecast S 51,632 51,885 57,380 62,482 63,207 68,441 71,898 74,088 75,683 77,322 79,004 80,732 82,507 84,330 86,202 88,126 90,103 92,134 94,221 96,367 98,571 100,837 103,167 105,562 108,024 110,556 2.4% W 43,029 35,422 35,752 37,792 48,126 51,172 54,186 55,919 57,045 58,200 59,385 60,600 61,847 63,127 64,440 65,788 67,172 68,592 70,050 71,546 73,083 74,661 76,281 77,945 79,654 81,410 2.3% Banning Electric Utility System Coincident Forecast
S 51,197 49,751 52,667 51,096 55,143 56,467 57,822 59,210 60,631 62,086 63,576 65,102 66,664 68,264 69,902 71,580 73,298 75,057 76,858 78,703 80,592 82,526 84,507 86,535 88,612 90,738 2.4% W 40,752 25,776 34,719 32,262 46,883 47,962 49,065 50,193 51,348 52,529 53,737 54,973 56,237 57,530 58,854 60,207 61,592 63,009 64,458 65,940 67,457 69,009 70,596 72,219 73,881 75,580 2.3% Conceptual Banning Electric Utility System Coincident Forecast S 51,197 49,751 52,667 51,096 55,143 56,467 58,962 61,201 69,810 76,184 86,777 100,472 109,135 120,377 129,082 137,336 145,321 153,347 157,527 161,751 166,019 167,953 169,934 171,962 174,039 176,165 5.9% W 40,752 25,776 34,719 32,262 46,883 47,962 50,205 52,185 60,527 66,627 76,938 90,343 98,708 109,643 118,034 125,963 133,615 141,299 145,127 148,988 152,884 154,436 156,023 157,646 159,308 161,007 6.2% Bridge-Morongo Logistics 0000 1,031 1,991 2,858 3,344 3,641 3,641 3,641 3,641 3,641 3,641 3,641 3,641 3,641 3,641 3,641 3,641 3,641 Sunset Crossroads 0 0 0 2,712 2,712 6,967 10,213 10,561 13,639 14,439 14,748 14,748 14,748 14,748 14,748 14,748 14,748 14,748 14,748 14,748 14,748 Rancho San Gorgonio 0 0 0 3,888 7,776 11,664 15,552 19,440 23,328 27,216 31,104 34,992 38,880 38,880 38,880 38,880 38,880 38,880 38,880 38,880 38,880 Mission Heights 000000 2,379 4,758 7,137 9,516 11,895 14,274 16,653 19,032 21,411 23,790 23,790 23,790 23,790 23,790 23,790 First Hathaway Logistics 0 0 0 0 0 0 471 471 471 471 471 471 471 471 471 471 471 471 471 471 471 Banning Commerce Center 0 0 0 0 0 0 438 438 438 438 438 438 438 438 438 438 438 438 438 438 438 WEKA 007777777777777777777
Charles St. CDRE 0 0 44 44 44 44 44 44 44 44 44 44 44 44 44 44 44 44 44 44 44 KCB Towers 0 0 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 Pallet Yard 007777777777777777777
First Lincoln Logistics 0 0 186 186 186 186 186 186 186 186 186 186 186 186 186 186 186 186 186 186 186 Brown Strauss 0 390 390 390 390 390 390 390 390 390 390 390 390 390 390 390 390 390 390 390 390 Wyndam Micro Hotel 0 750 750 750 750 750 750 750 750 750 750 750 750 750 750 750 750 750 750 750 750 DR Horton 0 0 588 1,175 1,175 1,175 1,175 1,175 1,175 1,175 1,175 1,175 1,175 1,175 1,175 1,175 1,175 1,175 1,175 1,175 1,175 Atwell Large Retail 0 0 0 0 0 0 880 880 880 880 880 880 880 880 880 880 880 880 880 880 880 2025-2045
Annual
Growth Rate
Historical Forecast
Peak kW Demand
3-2
294 672
.00

80.0060.0040.0020.00
120.00100.00
'20 '21 '22 '23 '24 '25 '26 '27 '28 '29 '30 '31 '32 '33 '34 '35 '36 '37 '38 '39 '40 '41 '42 '43 '44 '45 MW (x1,000)
YEAR

BANNING ELECTRIC UTILITY NON-COINCIDENT SYSTEM PEAK FORECAST

SUMMER-HISTORICAL

WINTER-HISTORICAL

WINTER-FORECAST

2.3% ANNUAL GROWTH
RATE

SUMMER-FORECAST

2.4% ANNUAL GROWTH
RATE
3-3
295 673
.00

90.0080.0070.0060.0050.0040.0030.0020.0010.00
100.00
'20 '21 '22 '23 '24 '25 '26 '27 '28 '29 '30 '31 '32 '33 '34 '35 '36 '37 '38 '39 '40 '41 '42 '43 '44 '45 MW (x1,000)
YEAR

BANNING ELECTRIC UTILITY COINCIDENT SYSTEM FORECAST

SUMMER-HISTORICAL

WINTER-HISTORICAL

WINTER-FORECAST

2.3% ANNUAL GROWTH
RATE

SUMMER-FORECAST

2.4% ANNUAL GROWTH
RATE
3-4
296 674
.00

80.0060.0040.0020.00
200.00180.00160.00140.00120.00100.00
'20 '21 '22 '23 '24 '25 '26 '27 '28 '29 '30 '31 '32 '33 '34 '35 '36 '37 '38 '39 '40 '41 '42 '43 '44 '45 MW (x1,000)
YEAR

CONCEPTUAL BANNING ELECTRIC UTILITY COINCIDENT SYSTEM FORECAST

SUMMER-HISTORICAL

WINTER-HISTORICAL

WINTER-FORECAST

6.2% ANNUAL GROWTH
RATE

SUMMER-FORECAST

5.9% ANNUAL GROWTH
RATE
3-5
297 675

BANNING ELECTRIC UTILITY
2026-2045 ESMP NON-COINCIDENT SYSTEM FORECAST
Total Load
for Month
(MWh)
Peak
MW
Total Load
for Month
(MWh)
Peak
MW
Total Load
for Month
(MWh)
Peak
MW
Total Load
for Month
(MWh)
Peak
MW
Total Load
for Month
(MWh)
Peak
MW
Total Load
for Month
(MWh)
Peak
MW
Total Load
for Month
(MWh)
Peak
MW
Jan 11,577 21.27 12,259 22.52 12,651 23.24 12,906 23.71 13,167 24.19 13,435 24.68 13,710 25.19 Feb 10,470 21.33 11,086 22.58 11,441 23.31 11,671 23.78 11,907 24.26 12,150 24.75 12,399 25.26 Mar 10,870 20.69 11,511 21.91 11,879 22.61 12,118 23.07 12,363 23.54 12,615 24.01 12,873 24.51 Apr 13,733 32.53 14,427 34.18 14,867 35.22 15,187 35.98 15,515 36.76 15,853 37.56 16,200 38.38 May 15,631 37.92 16,420 39.84 16,920 41.05 17,285 41.94 17,659 42.85 18,043 43.78 18,438 44.74 Jun 18,497 56.73 19,432 59.59 20,023 61.41 20,455 62.73 20,897 64.09 21,352 65.48 21,819 66.92 Jul 25,788 65.86 27,090 69.19 27,915 71.29 28,517 72.83 29,134 74.40 29,768 76.02 30,419 77.69 Aug 26,719 68.44 28,069 71.90 28,923 74.09 29,546 75.68 30,186 77.32 30,843 79.00 31,517 80.73 Sep 21,335 64.10 22,413 67.34 23,096 69.39 23,593 70.88 24,104 72.42 24,628 73.99 25,167 75.61 Oct 19,525 51.17 20,675 54.19 21,336 55.92 21,766 57.05 22,206 58.20 22,658 59.38 23,122 60.60 Nov 10,787 21.08 11,423 22.32 11,788 23.04 12,025 23.50 12,269 23.98 12,518 24.46 12,775 24.97 Dec 12,073 22.02 12,784 23.31 13,193 24.06 13,458 24.54 13,731 25.04 14,010 25.55 14,297 26.07 TOTAL: 197,005 207,588 214,032 218,526 223,138 227,873 232,734 Summer Peak (MW) 68.44 71.90 74.09 75.68 77.32 79.00 80.73 Winter Peak (MW) 51.17 54.19 55.92 57.05 58.20 59.38 60.60 Total Load
for Month
(MWh)
Peak
MW
Total Load
for Month
(MWh)
Peak
MW
Total Load
for Month
(MWh)
Peak
MW
Total Load
for Month
(MWh)
Peak
MW
Total Load
for Month
(MWh)
Peak
MW
Total Load
for Month
(MWh)
Peak
MW
Total Load
for Month
(MWh)
Peak
MW
Jan 13,992 25.71 14,282 26.24 14,579 26.79 14,884 27.35 15,197 27.92 15,518 28.51 15,848 29.12 Feb 12,654 25.78 12,916 26.31 13,184 26.86 13,460 27.42 13,743 28.00 14,034 28.59 14,332 29.20 Mar 13,138 25.01 13,410 25.53 13,689 26.06 13,975 26.60 14,269 27.16 14,571 27.74 14,880 28.33 Apr 16,556 39.22 16,922 40.09 17,297 40.98 17,683 41.89 18,080 42.83 18,488 43.80 18,907 44.79 May 18,843 45.72 19,259 46.73 19,687 47.77 20,126 48.83 20,578 49.93 21,042 51.05 21,518 52.21 Jun 22,299 68.39 22,791 69.90 23,297 71.45 23,817 73.04 24,352 74.68 24,901 76.37 25,465 78.10 Jul 31,087 79.39 31,774 81.15 32,480 82.95 33,205 84.80 33,950 86.70 34,715 88.66 35,501 90.67 Aug 32,210 82.51 32,922 84.33 33,653 86.20 34,404 88.13 35,176 90.10 35,969 92.13 36,783 94.22 Sep 25,720 77.27 26,288 78.98 26,872 80.74 27,472 82.54 28,088 84.39 28,721 86.29 29,372 88.25 Oct 23,598 61.85 24,086 63.13 24,587 64.44 25,102 65.79 25,630 67.17 26,171 68.59 26,728 70.05 Nov 13,038 25.48 13,307 26.01 13,584 26.55 13,868 27.10 14,160 27.67 14,459 28.26 14,767 28.86 Dec 14,591 26.61 14,893 27.16 15,203 27.73 15,521 28.31 15,847 28.90 16,182 29.51 16,526 30.14 TOTAL: 237,725 242,850 248,113 253,518 259,069 264,770 270,627 Summer Peak (MW) 82.51 84.33 86.20 88.13 90.10 92.13 94.22 Winter Peak (MW) 61.85 63.13 64.44 65.79 67.17 68.59 70.05 Total Load
for Month
(MWh)
Peak
MW
Total Load
for Month
(MWh)
Peak
MW
Total Load
for Month
(MWh)
Peak
MW
Total Load
for Month
(MWh)
Peak
MW
Total Load
for Month
(MWh)
Peak
MW
Total Load
for Month
(MWh)
Peak
MW
Total Load
for Month
(MWh)
Peak
MW
Jan 16,187 29.74 16,534 30.38 16,891 31.03 17,258 31.71 17,634 32.40 18,021 33.11 18,418 33.84 Feb 14,638 29.82 14,953 30.46 15,275 31.12 15,607 31.79 15,947 32.49 16,297 33.20 16,656 33.93 Mar 15,198 28.93 15,525 29.55 15,860 30.19 16,204 30.85 16,558 31.52 16,921 32.21 17,294 32.92 Apr 19,337 45.81 19,779 46.86 20,234 47.93 20,702 49.04 21,182 50.18 21,676 51.35 22,184 52.55 May 22,008 53.40 22,512 54.62 23,029 55.88 23,561 57.17 24,108 58.49 24,671 59.86 25,249 61.26 Jun 26,044 79.88 26,640 81.70 27,253 83.58 27,882 85.51 28,530 87.50 29,195 89.54 29,879 91.64 Jul 36,310 92.73 37,140 94.85 37,994 97.03 38,872 99.27 39,774 101.58 40,702 103.95 41,656 106.38 Aug 37,621 96.37 38,482 98.57 39,366 100.84 40,276 103.17 41,211 105.56 42,172 108.02 43,160 110.56 Sep 30,041 90.26 30,728 92.32 31,434 94.44 32,161 96.63 32,907 98.87 33,675 101.17 34,464 103.55 Oct 27,299 71.55 27,885 73.08 28,487 74.66 29,105 76.28 29,740 77.95 30,392 79.65 31,062 81.41 Nov 15,082 29.47 15,406 30.11 15,739 30.76 16,080 31.43 16,431 32.11 16,791 32.82 17,161 33.54 Dec 16,879 30.78 17,242 31.44 17,614 32.12 17,996 32.82 18,389 33.54 18,792 34.27 19,206 35.03 TOTAL: 276,644 282,826 289,178 295,705 302,412 309,305 316,390 Summer Peak (MW) 96.37 98.57 100.84 103.17 105.56 108.02 110.56 Winter Peak (MW) 71.55 73.08 74.66 76.28 77.95 79.65 81.41 2044 2045
Projected Load Data 2039-2045
2039 2040 2041 2042 2043
2038
Projected Load Data 2032-2038
2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037
Projected Load Data 2025 - 2031
2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031
3-6
298 676

BANNING ELECTRIC UTILITY
2026-2045 ESMP COINCIDENT SYSTEM FORECAST
Total Load
for Month
(MWh)
Peak
MW
Total Load
for Month
(MWh)
Peak
MW
Total Load
for Month
(MWh)
Peak
MW
Total Load
for Month
(MWh)
Peak
MW
Total Load
for Month
(MWh)
Peak
MW
Total Load
for Month
(MWh)
Peak
MW
Total Load
for Month
(MWh)
Peak
MW
Jan 10,851 19.94 11,100 20.39 11,356 20.86 11,617 21.34 11,884 21.83 12,157 22.34 12,437 22.85 Feb 9,813 19.99 10,038 20.45 10,269 20.92 10,506 21.40 10,747 21.89 10,994 22.40 11,247 22.91 Mar 10,188 19.40 10,423 19.84 10,662 20.30 10,908 20.76 11,158 21.24 11,415 21.73 11,678 22.23 Apr 11,331 26.84 11,603 27.49 11,881 28.15 12,166 28.82 12,458 29.51 12,757 30.22 13,063 30.95 May 12,896 31.29 13,205 32.04 13,522 32.81 13,847 33.60 14,179 34.40 14,519 35.23 14,868 36.07 Jun 15,261 46.80 15,627 47.93 16,002 49.08 16,386 50.25 16,780 51.46 17,182 52.70 17,595 53.96 Jul 21,276 54.34 21,787 55.64 22,309 56.98 22,845 58.34 23,393 59.74 23,955 61.18 24,529 62.65 Aug 22,044 56.47 22,573 57.82 23,115 59.21 23,670 60.63 24,238 62.09 24,820 63.58 25,415 65.10 Sep 17,603 52.89 18,025 54.16 18,458 55.45 18,901 56.79 19,354 58.15 19,819 59.54 20,294 60.97 Oct 18,300 47.96 18,721 49.06 19,151 50.19 19,592 51.35 20,042 52.53 20,503 53.74 20,975 54.97 Nov 10,110 19.76 10,343 20.21 10,581 20.68 10,824 21.15 11,073 21.64 11,328 22.14 11,588 22.65 Dec 11,315 20.64 11,575 21.11 11,842 21.60 12,114 22.09 12,393 22.60 12,678 23.12 12,969 23.65 TOTAL: 170,987 175,020 179,149 183,374 187,700 192,127 196,659 Summer Peak (MW) 56.47 57.82 59.21 60.63 62.09 63.58 65.10 Winter Peak (MW) 47.96 49.06 50.19 51.35 52.53 53.74 54.97 Total Load
for Month
(MWh)
Peak
MW
Total Load
for Month
(MWh)
Peak
MW
Total Load
for Month
(MWh)
Peak
MW
Total Load
for Month
(MWh)
Peak
MW
Total Load
for Month
(MWh)
Peak
MW
Total Load
for Month
(MWh)
Peak
MW
Total Load
for Month
(MWh)
Peak
MW
Jan 12,723 23.38 13,016 23.91 13,315 24.46 13,621 25.03 13,935 25.60 14,255 26.19 14,583 26.79 Feb 11,506 23.44 11,771 23.98 12,041 24.53 12,318 25.09 12,602 25.67 12,891 26.26 13,188 26.86 Mar 11,946 22.74 12,221 23.26 12,502 23.80 12,790 24.35 13,084 24.91 13,385 25.48 13,693 26.07 Apr 13,377 31.69 13,698 32.45 14,027 33.23 14,363 34.03 14,708 34.84 15,061 35.68 15,422 36.54 May 15,225 36.94 15,590 37.83 15,964 38.73 16,347 39.66 16,740 40.62 17,142 41.59 17,553 42.59 Jun 18,017 55.26 18,449 56.58 18,892 57.94 19,346 59.33 19,810 60.75 20,285 62.21 20,772 63.71 Jul 25,118 64.15 25,721 65.69 26,338 67.27 26,970 68.88 27,618 70.53 28,281 72.23 28,959 73.96 Aug 26,025 66.66 26,650 68.26 27,289 69.90 27,944 71.58 28,615 73.30 29,302 75.06 30,005 76.86 Sep 20,781 62.44 21,280 63.94 21,791 65.47 22,314 67.04 22,849 68.65 23,398 70.30 23,959 71.98 Oct 21,457 56.24 21,951 57.53 22,456 58.85 22,972 60.21 23,501 61.59 24,041 63.01 24,594 64.46 Nov 11,855 23.17 12,128 23.70 12,406 24.25 12,692 24.80 12,984 25.37 13,282 25.96 13,588 26.55 Dec 13,268 24.20 13,573 24.75 13,885 25.32 14,204 25.90 14,531 26.50 14,865 27.11 15,207 27.73 TOTAL: 201,298 206,047 210,907 215,882 220,975 226,188 231,523 Summer Peak (MW) 66.66 68.26 69.90 71.58 73.30 75.06 76.86 Winter Peak (MW) 56.24 57.53 58.85 60.21 61.59 63.01 64.46 Total Load
for Month
(MWh)
Peak
MW
Total Load
for Month
(MWh)
Peak
MW
Total Load
for Month
(MWh)
Peak
MW
Total Load
for Month
(MWh)
Peak
MW
Total Load
for Month
(MWh)
Peak
MW
Total Load
for Month
(MWh)
Peak
MW
Total Load
for Month
(MWh)
Peak
MW
Jan 14,918 27.41 15,261 28.04 15,612 28.68 15,971 29.34 16,339 30.02 16,715 30.71 17,099 31.42 Feb 13,491 27.48 13,801 28.11 14,119 28.76 14,444 29.42 14,776 30.10 15,116 30.79 15,463 31.50 Mar 14,007 26.67 14,330 27.28 14,659 27.91 14,996 28.55 15,341 29.20 15,694 29.88 16,055 30.56 Apr 15,793 37.41 16,172 38.31 16,560 39.23 16,957 40.17 17,364 41.14 17,781 42.12 18,208 43.13 May 17,974 43.61 18,406 44.66 18,847 45.73 19,300 46.83 19,763 47.95 20,237 49.10 20,723 50.28 Jun 21,271 65.23 21,781 66.80 22,304 68.40 22,839 70.04 23,387 71.73 23,949 73.45 24,523 75.21 Jul 29,654 75.73 30,366 77.55 31,095 79.41 31,841 81.32 32,605 83.27 33,388 85.27 34,189 87.32 Aug 30,725 78.70 31,462 80.59 32,218 82.53 32,991 84.51 33,783 86.53 34,593 88.61 35,424 90.74 Sep 24,534 73.71 25,123 75.48 25,726 77.29 26,344 79.15 26,976 81.05 27,623 82.99 28,286 84.98 Oct 25,160 65.94 25,738 67.46 26,330 69.01 26,936 70.60 27,555 72.22 28,189 73.88 28,838 75.58 Nov 13,900 27.17 14,220 27.79 14,547 28.43 14,882 29.08 15,224 29.75 15,574 30.44 15,932 31.14 Dec 15,557 28.37 15,915 29.02 16,281 29.69 16,655 30.37 17,038 31.07 17,430 31.79 17,831 32.52 TOTAL: 236,985 242,576 248,298 254,156 260,152 266,289 272,571 Summer Peak (MW) 78.70 80.59 82.53 84.51 86.53 88.61 90.74 Winter Peak (MW) 65.94 67.46 69.01 70.60 72.22 73.88 75.58 Projected Load Data 2039-2045
Projected Load Data 2032-2038
2039 2040 2041 2042 2043 2044 2045
Projected Load Data 2025 - 2031
2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038
2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031
3-7
299 677

BANNING ELECTRIC UTILITY
2026-2045 ESMP CONCEPTUAL COINCIDENT SYSTEM FORECAST
Total Load
for Month
(MWh)
Peak
MW
Total Load
for Month
(MWh)
Peak
MW
Total Load
for Month
(MWh)
Peak
MW
Total Load
for Month
(MWh)
Peak
MW
Total Load
for Month
(MWh)
Peak
MW
Total Load
for Month
(MWh)
Peak
MW
Total Load
for Month
(MWh)
Peak
MW
Jan 10,851 19.94 11,358 20.87 11,806 21.69 13,693 25.16 15,074 27.69 17,406 31.98 20,439 37.55 Feb 9,813 19.99 10,272 20.92 10,677 21.75 12,384 25.23 13,632 27.77 15,741 32.07 18,484 37.65 Mar 10,188 19.40 10,665 20.30 11,085 21.10 12,857 24.48 14,153 26.94 16,344 31.11 19,191 36.53 Apr 11,331 26.84 11,831 28.03 12,281 29.09 14,008 33.19 15,287 36.22 17,413 41.25 20,161 47.76 May 12,896 31.29 13,466 32.67 13,977 33.91 15,943 38.68 17,399 42.22 19,818 48.08 22,946 55.67 Jun 15,261 46.80 15,935 48.87 16,540 50.73 18,867 57.86 20,590 63.15 23,453 71.93 27,154 83.28 Jul 21,276 54.34 22,216 56.74 23,060 58.89 26,303 67.18 28,705 73.31 32,696 83.50 37,856 96.68 Aug 22,044 56.47 23,018 58.96 23,892 61.20 27,253 69.81 29,742 76.18 33,877 86.78 39,223 100.47 Sep 17,603 52.89 18,380 55.22 19,078 57.32 21,762 65.38 23,749 71.35 27,051 81.27 31,320 94.10 Oct 18,300 47.96 19,156 50.20 19,911 52.18 23,094 60.53 25,421 66.63 29,356 76.94 34,470 90.34 Nov 10,110 19.76 10,583 20.68 11,001 21.50 12,759 24.94 14,045 27.45 16,219 31.70 19,044 37.22 Dec 11,315 20.64 11,844 21.60 12,312 22.45 14,280 26.04 15,719 28.67 18,151 33.10 21,314 38.87 TOTAL: 170,987 178,725 185,621 213,204 233,515 267,525 311,603 Summer Peak (MW) 56.47 58.96 61.20 69.81 76.18 86.78 100.47 Winter Peak (MW) 47.96 50.20 52.18 60.53 66.63 76.94 90.34 Total Load
for Month
(MWh)
Peak
MW
Total Load
for Month
(MWh)
Peak
MW
Total Load
for Month
(MWh)
Peak
MW
Total Load
for Month
(MWh)
Peak
MW
Total Load
for Month
(MWh)
Peak
MW
Total Load
for Month
(MWh)
Peak
MW
Total Load
for Month
(MWh)
Peak
MW
Jan 22,332 41.03 24,806 45.58 26,704 49.06 28,498 52.36 30,229 55.54 31,967 58.73 32,833 60.32 Feb 20,195 41.14 22,433 45.70 24,149 49.19 25,772 52.50 27,337 55.69 28,909 58.89 29,692 60.49 Mar 20,968 39.92 23,291 44.34 25,073 47.73 26,758 50.94 28,383 54.03 30,016 57.14 30,829 58.69 Apr 21,899 51.88 24,155 57.22 25,902 61.36 27,558 65.29 29,160 69.08 30,771 72.90 31,610 74.88 May 24,924 60.47 27,492 66.70 29,480 71.53 31,365 76.10 33,188 80.53 35,021 84.97 35,976 87.29 Jun 29,495 90.46 32,534 99.78 34,886 106.99 37,117 113.83 39,275 120.45 41,444 127.10 42,574 130.57 Jul 41,121 105.02 45,356 115.84 48,637 124.21 51,746 132.15 54,755 139.84 57,779 147.56 59,354 151.58 Aug 42,606 109.14 46,994 120.38 50,393 129.08 53,615 137.34 56,732 145.32 59,866 153.35 61,498 157.53 Sep 34,021 102.21 37,526 112.74 40,239 120.90 42,812 128.63 45,301 136.11 47,803 143.62 49,107 147.54 Oct 37,662 98.71 41,835 109.64 45,036 118.03 48,061 125.96 50,981 133.62 53,913 141.30 55,373 145.13 Nov 20,808 40.66 23,113 45.17 24,882 48.63 26,553 51.89 28,166 55.05 29,786 58.21 30,593 59.79 Dec 23,287 42.47 25,867 47.17 27,847 50.78 29,718 54.20 31,523 57.49 33,336 60.79 34,239 62.44 TOTAL: 339,319 375,401 403,228 429,573 455,032 480,611 493,678 Summer Peak (MW) 109.14 120.38 129.08 137.34 145.32 153.35 157.53 Winter Peak (MW) 98.71 109.64 118.03 125.96 133.62 141.30 145.13 Total Load
for Month
(MWh)
Peak
MW
Total Load
for Month
(MWh)
Peak
MW
Total Load
for Month
(MWh)
Peak
MW
Total Load
for Month
(MWh)
Peak
MW
Total Load
for Month
(MWh)
Peak
MW
Total Load
for Month
(MWh)
Peak
MW
Total Load
for Month
(MWh)
Peak
MW
Jan 33,707 61.93 34,588 63.55 34,939 64.19 35,298 64.85 35,666 65.53 36,042 66.22 36,426 66.93 Feb 30,483 62.10 31,280 63.72 31,597 64.37 31,922 65.03 32,254 65.70 32,594 66.40 32,941 67.10 Mar 31,649 60.25 32,477 61.82 32,806 62.45 33,143 63.09 33,488 63.75 33,841 64.42 34,202 65.11 Apr 32,457 76.89 33,314 78.92 33,702 79.84 34,099 80.78 34,506 81.75 34,923 82.73 35,350 83.74 May 36,941 89.63 37,915 91.99 38,357 93.07 38,810 94.16 39,273 95.29 39,747 96.44 40,233 97.62 Jun 43,716 134.07 44,869 137.61 45,392 139.21 45,927 140.85 46,475 142.53 47,037 144.25 47,611 146.02 Jul 60,946 155.65 62,554 159.76 63,283 161.62 64,029 163.52 64,793 165.47 65,575 167.47 66,377 169.52 Aug 63,146 161.75 64,813 166.02 65,568 167.95 66,341 169.93 67,133 171.96 67,943 174.04 68,774 176.17 Sep 50,423 151.49 51,754 155.49 52,357 157.30 52,974 159.16 53,606 161.06 54,254 163.00 54,917 164.99 Oct 56,847 148.99 58,333 152.88 58,925 154.44 59,531 156.02 60,150 157.65 60,784 159.31 61,432 161.01 Nov 31,407 61.38 32,228 62.98 32,555 63.62 32,890 64.28 33,232 64.95 33,582 65.63 33,941 66.33 Dec 35,150 64.10 36,069 65.78 36,435 66.45 36,809 67.13 37,192 67.83 37,584 68.54 37,985 69.27 TOTAL: 506,871 520,193 525,915 531,773 537,769 543,906 550,188 Summer Peak (MW) 161.75 166.02 167.95 169.93 171.96 174.04 176.17 Winter Peak (MW) 148.99 152.88 154.44 156.02 157.65 159.31 161.01 2044 2045
Projected Load Data 2039-2045
2039 2040 2041 2042 2043
2038
Projected Load Data 2032-2038
2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037
Projected Load Data 2025 - 2031
2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031
3-8
300 678
0 50
300250200150100
'19 '20 '21 '22 '23 '24 '25 '26 '27 '28 '29 '30 '31 '32 '33 '34 '35 '36 '37 '38 '39 '40 '41 '42 '43 '44 '45 MWH (x1,000)
YEAR

BANNING ELECTRIC UTILTIY MWH PURCHASES

HISTORICAL

FORECAST

2.4% ANNUAL GROWTH
RATE
3-9
301 679
0 5,000
30,00025,00020,00015,00010,000
'20 '21 '22 '23 '24 '25 '26 '27 '28 '29 '30 '31 '32 '33 '34 '35 '36 '37 '38 '39 '40 '41 '42 '43 '44 '45 kW
YEAR
SAN GORGONIO TOTAL kW DEMAND

SUMMER-HISTORICAL

WINTER-HISTORICAL

WINTER-FORECAST

1.7% ANNUAL GROWTH
RATE

SUMMER-FORECAST

1.7% ANNUAL GROWTH
RATE
3-10
302 680
0 5,000
30,00025,00020,00015,00010,000
'20 '21 '22 '23 '24 '25 '26 '27 '28 '29 '30 '31 '32 '33 '34 '35 '36 '37 '38 '39 '40 '41 '42 '43 '44 '45 kW
YEAR
MIDWAY TOTAL kW DEMAND

SUMMER-HISTORICAL

WINTER-HISTORICAL

SUMMER-FORECAST

2.7% ANNUAL GROWTH
RATE

WINTER-FORECAST

2.7% ANNUAL GROWTH
RATE
3-11
303 681
0 8,0006,0004,0002,000
14,00012,00010,000
'20 '21 '22 '23 '24 '25 '26 '27 '28 '29 '30 '31 '32 '33 '34 '35 '36 '37 '38 '39 '40 '41 '42 '43 '44 '45 kW
YEAR
22ND STREET kW DEMAND

SUMMER-HISTORICAL

WINTER-HISTORICAL

WINTER-FORECAST

1.1% ANNUAL GROWTH
RATE

SUMMER-FORECAST

1.1% ANNUAL GROWTH
RATE
3-12
304 682
0 8,0006,0004,0002,000
12,00010,000
'20 '21 '22 '23 '24 '25 '26 '27 '28 '29 '30 '31 '32 '33 '34 '35 '36 '37 '38 '39 '40 '41 '42 '43 '44 '45 kW
YEAR
STAGECOACH kW DEMAND

SUMMER-HISTORICAL

WINTER-HISTORICAL

WINTER-FORECAST

2.0% ANNUAL GROWTH
RATE

SUMMER-FORECAST

2.0% ANNUAL GROWTH
RATE
3-13
305 683
0 9,0008,0007,0006,0005,0004,0003,0002,0001,000
'20 '21 '22 '23 '24 '25 '26 '27 '28 '29 '30 '31 '32 '33 '34 '35 '36 '37 '38 '39 '40 '41 '42 '43 '44 '45 kW
YEAR
IVY kW DEMAND

SUMMER-HISTORICAL

WINTER-HISTORICAL

WINTER-FORECAST

2.0% ANNUAL GROWTH
RATE

SUMMER-FORECAST

2.0% ANNUAL GROWTH
RATE
3-14
306 684
0 5,000
30,00025,00020,00015,00010,000
'20 '21 '22 '23 '24 '25 '26 '27 '28 '29 '30 '31 '32 '33 '34 '35 '36 '37 '38 '39 '40 '41 '42 '43 '44 '45 kW
YEAR
SUNSET kW DEMAND

SUMMER-HISTORICAL

WINTER-HISTORICAL

WINTER-FORECAST

4.5% ANNUAL GROWTH
RATE

SUMMER-FORECAST

4.3% ANNUAL GROWTH
RATE
3-15
307 685

CITY OF BANNING ELECTRIC UTILITY
2026-2045 ELECTRIC SERVICE MASTER PLAN

4.0 – LAND USE AND POPULATION
The City of Banning is located in Riverside County and has a reported 2026 population of approximately 33,000 people which has increased by an estimated 10% since the most recent census in 2020. The annual growth rate is projected at 1.6% The BEU service area for the most part is the same as the Banning City Boundary which covers approximately 23 square miles.

The following table shows current development whose load was included in the ESMP analysis.

Table 4.0-1 – Current Developments
Development Classification Land Area (acres) Size
Atwell Subdivision Residential 1,457 14,000 + lots
Cannabis Cultivation Industrial 0.5 -
Yoshinoya Commercial - -
Morongo Health Clinic Commercial - -
Crestwood Communities Residential 5.9 19 lots
Vista Robles Homes Residential 72 140 lots
The following table shows future developments whose load was included in the ESMP analysis.

Table 4.0-2 – Future Developments
Development Classification Land Area (acres) Size
Bridge-Morongo Logistics Commercial/Industrial 509 5 buildings Sunset Crossroads Commercial/Industrial 559 6 buildings Rancho San Gorgonio Residential 710 3,600 lots
Mission Heights Residential - 2,200 lots
First Hathaway Logistics Commercial/Industrial 88 -
Banning Commerce Center Industrial 124 -
WEKA Industrial 3.4 -
Charlles St. CDRE Industrial 4.6 -
KCB Towers Industrial 4.5 -
Pallet Yard Industrial 0.3 -
First Lincoln Logistics Commercial 6.2 -
Brown Strauss Commercial 15.8 -
Wyndam Micro Hotel Residential/Commercial 1.3 -
DR Horton Residential - 98 lots
Atwell Large Retail Commercial - -
4-1
308 686

CITY OF BANNING, CALIFORNIA
2026-2030 5-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
April 2026
Prepared by:

Finley Engineering Company, Inc.

On behalf of:

Banning Electric Utility
Contact Information:

Finley Engineering Company, Inc.

PO Box 148, 104 E. 11th Street
Lamar, MO 64795
417.682.5531
www.finleyusa.com
City of Banning
99 E. Ramsey Street
Banning, CA 92220
951.922.3100
www.banningca.gov
5-1
309 687

ENGINEERS CERTIFICATION
I, Christopher Adam Smart, P.E., herby certify that this 2026-2030 5-Year Capital Improvement Plan was prepared by me or under my direct Supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the state of California, license number E 25395.

X
5-2
310 688

CITY OF BANNING ELECTRIC UTILITY

ELECTRIC SERVICE MASTER PLAN
5-YEAR CIP

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section Page

5.0 - 5-Year Construction Improvement Plan (CIP) 5-1

5.1 - Executive Summary 5-5

5.1.1 - Introduction 5-5

5.1.2 - Purpose of Study 5-5

5.1.3 - General Conclusions and Recommendations 5-5

5.2 - Planning Criteria 5-7

5.2.1 - Distribution System 5-7

5.2.2 - Substation 5-8

5.2.3 - Basis of Cost Estimates 5-8

5.3 - System Forecast 5-11

5.4 - Overhead Maintenance Program 5-26

5.5 - Capital Maintenance Project 5-27

5.6 - Substation Capacity Analysis 5-46

5.7 - Distribution System Analysis 5-47

5.8 - Total Cost Estimate 5-75
List of Table, Charts, and Images Page
Table 5.2.3-1 – Conductor Material Cost 5-8
Table 5.2.3-2 Pole Material Cost 5-8
Table 5.2.3-3 Transformer Material Cost 5-9
Table 5.2.3-4 Framing Units Material Cost 5-9
Table 5.2.3-5 Underground Material Cost 5-10
Table 5.2.3-6 Overhead Construction Labor and Fleet Cost 5-10 Table 5.2.3-7 Underground Construction Labor and Fleet Cost 5-10 Banning Electric Utility Demand Forecast Table 5-12
Banning Electric Utility Non-Coincident System Peak Forecast Chart 5-13 Banning Electric Utility Coincident System Forecast Chart 5-14 Conceptual Banning Electric Utility Coincident System Forecast Chart 5-15 Banning Electric Utility MWH Purchases Chart 5-19
San Gorgonio Total kW Demand Chart 5-20
Midway Total kW Demand Chart 5-21
22nd Street Total kW Demand Chart 5-22
Stagecoach Total kW Demand Chart 5-23
Ivy Total kW Demand Chart 5-24
Sunset Total kW Demand Chart 5-25
Table 5.4-1 – Overhead Maintenance Program Costs 5-26
Table 5.5-1 – Capital Maintenance Project Costs 5-27
Table 5.6-1 – Substation Capacity Analysis 5-46
5-3
311 689

CITY OF BANNING ELECTRIC UTILITY

ELECTRIC SERVICE MASTER PLAN
5-YEAR CIP
Image 5.7-1 – CIP Project 1 5-48
Image 5.7-2 – CIP Project 2 5-49
Image 5.7-3 – CIP Project 3 5-50
Image 5.7-4 – CIP Project 4 5-51
Image 5.7-5 – CIP Project 5 5-52
Image 5.7-6 – CIP Project 6 5-53
Image 5.7-7 – CIP Project 7 5-54
Image 5.7-8 – CIP Project 8 5-55
Image 5.7-9 – CIP Project 9 5-56
Image 5.7-10 – CIP Project 10 5-57
Image 5.7-11 – CIP Project 11 5-58
Image 5.7-12 – CIP Project 12 5-59
Image 5.7-13 – CIP Project 13 5-60
Image 5.7-14 – CIP Project 14 5-61
Image 5.7-15 – CIP Project 15 5-62
Image 5.7-16 – CIP Project 16 5-63
Image 5.7-17 – CIP Project 17 5-64
Image 5.7-18 – CIP Project 18 5-65
Image 5.7-19 – CIP Project 19 5-66
Image 5.7-20 – CIP Project 20 5-67
Image 5.7-21 – CIP Project 21 5-68
Image 5.7-22 – CIP Project 22 5-69
Image 5.7-23 – CIP Project 23 5-70
Image 5.7-24 – CIP Project 24 5-71
Image 5.7-25 – CIP Project 25 5-72
Image 5.7-26 – CIP Project 26 5-73
Image 5.7-27 – CIP Project 27 5-74
Table 5.8-1 – Total 5-Year CIP Cost Estimate 5-75
5-4
312 690

CITY OF BANNING ELECTRIC UTILITY

ELECTRIC SERVICE MASTER PLAN
5-YEAR CIP

5.1 - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

5.1.1 - Introduction
The City of Banning owns the utility that provides electric service to Banning, California and the electric utility is maintained by Banning Electric Utility (BEU). Originally established in 1913 as a private utility, the City of Banning purchased the electric utility in 1922 and has been providing electric service to its residents since that time. Banning’s energy resource base includes portions of nuclear, geothermal, solar, landfill gas-to-energy, and hydro generating plants, that provide the majority of electricity required to meet the system peak demand.

Through an agreement with Southern California Edison Company (SCE), the BEU system utilizes SEC’s transmission system in bringing power from the California Independent System Operator (“CAISO”) controlled high voltage transmission grid to the BEU distribution system at the Banning Substation. BEU maintains three, 34.5kV sub-transmission circuits totaling approximately eighteen miles which feed six distribution substations.

The City of Banning supports clean-energy and is committed to additional renewable energy resources to its already diverse portfolio. BEU has met and/or exceeded the renewable energy requirements of Compliance Period #1, Compliance Period #2, and Compliance Period #3 of the State’s Renewables Portfolio Standard (RPS) program. The Utility was 81 percent renewable in 2022, already exceeding the current State mandate of 60 percent by 2030.

5.1.2 - Purpose of Study
This 5-year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) is a study prepared by Finley Engineering Company, Inc. (Finley) based on an analysis and review of the historical system growth and operation to determine projections of future growth, recommendations for capital improvements, and scheduled system maintenance that will insure the continued economical and reliable operation of the system over the ensuing 5-year period.

5.1.3 – General Conclusions and Recommendations
The 5-Year CIP includes projects and estimated costs for Overhead Maintenance, Capital Maintenance, and Distribution System Improvements.

The Overhead Maintenance program include the inspection of 3,900 poles and the replacement of 350 pole at a total estimated cost of $4,058,438.

Capital Maintenance includes 18 various projects such as underground conductor replacement, fiber extensions, substation breaker upgrades, fire mitigation, line hardening, line re-routes and/or relocation, recloser installations for sectionalizing, etc. The total estimated cost for these projects 5-5
313 691

CITY OF BANNING ELECTRIC UTILITY

ELECTRIC SERVICE MASTER PLAN
5-YEAR CIP
is $20,784,500. It is expected that BEU will receive $9,293,750 in cost in aid to construction (CIAC) bringing the total BEU funding cost to $11,490,750.

Analysis was run using Milsoft’s Windmil software on the distribution system to determine system improvement projects to correct low voltage, decrease conductor and equipment loading, and reduce single phase line loading to aid in phase balancing. The analysis results include 14 projects to switch load to adjacent lines to reduce single-phase line loading at a total estimated cost of $41,700, 2 projects for new line construction of 600’ totaling $336,400, 9 projects for singlephase to three-phase line rebuild of 10,107’ totaling $2,142,100, and 2 projects for three-phase line rebuild using larger conductor of 2,130’ totaling $285,500. The total estimated cost for distribution system improvements is $2,805,700.

The total estimated cost for the 5-Year CIP is $27,648,638 with an estimated $9,293,750 in CIAC reducing the BEU funding estimate to $18,354,888. For the BEU funding cost, 22% is for Overhead Maintenance, 63% is for Capital Maintenance, and 15% is for Distribution System improvements.
5-6
314 692

CITY OF BANNING ELECTRIC UTILITY

ELECTRIC SERVICE MASTER PLAN
5-YEAR CIP

5.2 – Planning Criteria

5.2.1 - Distribution System
The distribution projects contained in this 5-Year CIP are recommended based upon the following planning criteria.
a. With an assumed delivered voltage of 125 volts (1.041 per unit on a 120 volt base) during peak load conditions, the design minimum allowable voltage at the primary terminals of any distribution transformer shall be 118 volts (0.98 per unit on a 120 volt base). b. Voltage regulators and step transformers will be upgraded when projected peak loads exceed 85% of the device’s rating.
c. Sectionalizing devices will be upgraded when projected peak loads exceed 70% of the device’s continuous current rating.
d. Primary conductors on the 7.2/12.5 kV and below distribution system will be upgraded when projected peak loads exceed 60% of the conductor’s thermal rating and may be subject to upgrade before this time if anticipated load growth may potentially exceed 60% of the conductor’s thermal rating
e. Primary conductors on the 34.5 kV sub-transmission system will be upgraded when projected peak loads exceed 90% of the conductor’s thermal rating and may be subject to upgrade before this time if anticipated load growth may potentially exceed 90% of the conductor’s thermal rating
f. Single-phase primary voltage lines will be limited to 35 amps maximum loading. g. The power factor at the delivery point under peak loading conditions is desired to be no less than 95%. The off-peak power factor should preferably be maintained between 95% lagging and 95% leading. This criterion is subject to the cost of the installation of capacitors, switches, and controls vs. the cost of kilowatt (kW) loss reduction.

5.2.1.1 - Distribution System Design Criteria
The following design criteria was considered when determining projects contained in this 5-year CIP.
a. Feeder current balance will be maintained at plus or minus 20% of the average per phase loading during peak conditions. This criterion may be relaxed in areas where it could impose unnecessary or premature costs.
b. Conductor sizes will be economically sized but may be modified to conform to BEU’s standard conductor sizes.
c. Load switching and backfeeding will be considered to defer unnecessary or premature costs to correct any load voltage or high conductor loading. 5-7
315 693

CITY OF BANNING ELECTRIC UTILITY

ELECTRIC SERVICE MASTER PLAN
5-YEAR CIP
d. Load switching and backfeeding will be considered to defer unnecessary or premature costs to correct any high single-phase loading. For areas where there is no backfeed or load switch solution, additional conductors will be added to allow for phase balancing. e. Relocation of existing line sections will be considered where inaccessibility impedes the maintenance of line sections or jeopardizes the service or reliability of line sections.

5.2.2 – Substation
The substation projects contained in this 5-Year CIP are recommended based upon the following planning criteria.
a. Substation transformers will limited to 95% of the max kVA rating of the transformer. The following improvements will be considered in the event the load exceeds 95% of the max kVA rating:
a. Load switching to adjacent substations
b. Upgrade of existing transformer
c. Installation of an additional transformer in the existing substation d. Construction of a new substation

5.2.3 – Basis of Cost Estimates
The following tables for material and labor costs were used to determine total project costs. The costs were taken from actual prices provided by BEU as well as prices received by FEC from other sources.

Table 5.2.3-1 Conductor Material Cost
Conductor (price per foot)
OH Conductor UG Conductor
#2 Copper $1.31 1/0 AL, 15 kV $2.03
#2 ACSR $0.26 1/0 CU, 15 kV $10.98
#4 ACSR $0.15 1/0 CU, 35 kV $8.47
1/0 ACSR $0.30 4/0 CU $6.95
4/0 Copper $3.11 4/0 AL $4.97
4/0 ACSR $0.80 350 CU $7.53
336 ACSR $1.62 750 AL $13.38
Table 5.2.3-2 Pole Material Cost
Pole Price per unit Pole Price per unit
35' Douglas Fir, H2 $1,269.30 35’ Wood, Class 2 $1,067.38 40’ Wood, Class 2 $766.35
45' Douglas Fir, H2 $1,771.08 45’ Wood, Class 2 $953.80 50’ Wood, Class 2 $1,135.73
55' Douglas Fir, H2 $2,889.48 55’ Wood, Class 2 $918.72 60' Douglas Fir, H2 $2,945.89 60’ Wood, Class 2 $1,362.29 5-8
316 694

CITY OF BANNING ELECTRIC UTILITY

ELECTRIC SERVICE MASTER PLAN
5-YEAR CIP
Table 5.2.3-3 Transformer Material Cost
Transformer Price per unit
10 kVA O.H. Transformer S-Type 7,200 $500.00
15 kVA 7,200, 120/240 DV S-Type $645.42
25 kVA 7,200, 120/240 DV S-Type $919.16
37 kVA 7,200, 120/240 DV S-Type $1,496.65
50 kVA 7,200 120/240 $3,992.05
75 kVA 3Ø 12,470/7,200 120/208 $6,023.22
300 kVA DV $8,583.61
750 kVA 3Ø 12,470/7,200 $14,626.30
1,000 kVA 3Ø 12,470/7,200 DV $10,809.48
2,500 kVA 3Ø 12,470/7,200 277/480 $34,539.92
25 kVA 1Ø 12,470/7,200 120/240 Pdmnt $3,685.34

37.5 kVA 1Ø 12,400/7,200 DV Pdmnt $1,988.01
75 kVA 1Ø 12,470/7,200 120/240 Pdmnt $7,110.42
300 kVA 3Ø 12,470/4,160 DV Pdmnt 208/120 $13,547.15
500 kVA 3Ø Pdmnt $10,442.65
1,500 kVA DV 3Ø Pdmnt 277/480 $31,037.04
Table 5.2.3-4 Framing Units Material Cost
Framing Unit Price per unit
A1.3P $75.32
A1.11P $493.46
A5.2G $286.41
A3.1 $78.74
A6.21 $1,080.29
G1.2 $317.41
G1.2 $1,318.96
A5.1 $195.12
A5.21 $888.35
(A4.1) $255.90
G1.3 $433.79
G1.3 $1,127.02
C1.11 $628.33
C1.81G $1,592.53
C1.11,A5.21 $1,516.68
C5.82G $3,472.80
C3.1 $208.96
C3.1,A5.1 $404.08
C3.1,A5.21 $1,097.31
C3.1, C5.1 $376.78
C5.1 $167.82
C5.1,A5.1 $362.94
C5.1,A5.21 $1,056.17
5-9
317 695

CITY OF BANNING ELECTRIC UTILITY

ELECTRIC SERVICE MASTER PLAN
5-YEAR CIP
Table 5.2.3-5 Underground Material Cost
Material Price per unit
Light Duty Secondary Box $78.42
Light Duty Secondary Lid $83.43
4" PVC SCH 40 (per foot) $1.69
1/0 AL U/G (per foot) $4.75
Service Entrance Sleeve $0.45
Deadend Shoe Small $8.58
Power Solve (Pulling Lube) $58.98
Table 5.2.3-6 Overhead Construction Labor and Fleet Cost Units
(hr.)
Unit Cost
(per hr.)
Utility Bed P/U 1 ton (Foreman) (2 hrs. per connection) 4 $27.78 2 Person Lift (Bucket Truck) 55' (2 hrs. per connection) 2 $51.68 4 Person Crew 4 $466.73
3 Person Crew (2 hours per connection) 4 $352.02
2 Person Crew 2 $237.31
Electrical Engineering Supervisor (0.5 hrs. per connection) 1 $125.98 Electric Service Planning Supervisor (0.5 hrs. per connection) 1 $127.97 GIS Technician (1 hr. per connection) 2 $59.21
For overhead line, project cost estimates are based on an average of construction 1 mile of line per month with average span lengths at 150’.

Table 5.2.3-7 Underground Construction Labor and Fleet Cost Labor Price per hr.
4 Person Line Crew $466.73
Powerline Crew Superintendent $135.93
Fleet Price per hr.

Engineering (10%) and contingency (5%) were also added for each cost estimate. 5-10
318 696

CITY OF BANNING ELECTRIC UTILITY

ELECTRIC SERVICE MASTER PLAN
5-YEAR CIP

5.3 – System Forecast
The 5-year CIP demand forecast was prepared to project the summer and winter kW demand per substation area as well as the total system demand for the City of Banning for the 2025-2030 CIP period. The historical non-coincident substation demands as well as the historical coincident system demands were provided by BEU and used as the basis for the forecast. BEU also provided insight into new load additions that are in some sort of application or planning process and were used in the conceptual forecast.

Along with new load additions, considerations were also made for the addition of EV chargers at new subdivision locations.

This forecast will be used to run voltage drop and load flow analysis to determine system improvements required to reliably serve the City of Banning existing consumers and allow for future consumer growth.

It is projected that the BEU system will reach a non-coincident peak of 79,004 kW in the summer of 2030 and 59,385 kW in the winter of 2030. It is also projected that the BEU system will reach a coincident peak of 63,576 kW in the summer of 2030 and 53,737 kW in the winter of 2030.

A separate conceptual forecast was created to include new load additions that are in some state of application or planning process. It is projected that the BEU system will reach a conceptual non-coincident peak of 86,777 kW in the summer of 2030 and 76,938 kW in the winter of 2030.

As part of the historical review, MWH purchases were also reviewed and a forecast was determined. It is projected that the BEU system will have an annual coincident purchase of 192,127 MWH’s by 2030.

80.0060.0040.0020.00
120.00100.00
'20 '21 '22 '23 '24 '25 '26 '27 '28 '29 '30 '31 '32 '33 '34 '35 '36 '37 '38 '39 '40 '41 '42 '43 '44 '45 MW (x1,000)
YEAR

BANNING ELECTRIC UTILITY NON-COINCIDENT SYSTEM PEAK FORECAST

SUMMER-HISTORICAL

WINTER-HISTORICAL

WINTER-FORECAST

2.3% ANNUAL GROWTH
RATE

SUMMER-FORECAST

2.4% ANNUAL GROWTH
RATE
5-13
321 699
.00

90.0080.0070.0060.0050.0040.0030.0020.0010.00
100.00
'20 '21 '22 '23 '24 '25 '26 '27 '28 '29 '30 '31 '32 '33 '34 '35 '36 '37 '38 '39 '40 '41 '42 '43 '44 '45 MW (x1,000)
YEAR

BANNING ELECTRIC UTILITY COINCIDENT SYSTEM FORECAST

SUMMER-HISTORICAL

WINTER-HISTORICAL

WINTER-FORECAST

2.3% ANNUAL GROWTH
RATE

SUMMER-FORECAST

2.4% ANNUAL GROWTH
RATE
5-14
322 700
.00

80.0060.0040.0020.00
200.00180.00160.00140.00120.00100.00
'20 '21 '22 '23 '24 '25 '26 '27 '28 '29 '30 '31 '32 '33 '34 '35 '36 '37 '38 '39 '40 '41 '42 '43 '44 '45 MW (x1,000)
YEAR

CONCEPTUAL BANNING ELECTRIC UTILITY COINCIDENT SYSTEM FORECAST

SUMMER-HISTORICAL

WINTER-HISTORICAL

WINTER-FORECAST

6.2% ANNUAL GROWTH
RATE

SUMMER-FORECAST

5.9% ANNUAL GROWTH
RATE
5-15
323 701

BANNING ELECTRIC UTILITY
2026-2045 ESMP CONCEPTUAL COINCIDENT SYSTEM FORECAST
Total Load
for Month
(MWh)
Peak
MW
Total Load
for Month
(MWh)
Peak
MW
Total Load
for Month
(MWh)
Peak
MW
Total Load
for Month
(MWh)
Peak
MW
Total Load
for Month
(MWh)
Peak
MW
Total Load
for Month
(MWh)
Peak
MW
Total Load
for Month
(MWh)
Peak
MW
Jan 10,851 19.94 11,358 20.87 11,806 21.69 13,693 25.16 15,074 27.69 17,406 31.98 20,439 37.55 Feb 9,813 19.99 10,272 20.92 10,677 21.75 12,384 25.23 13,632 27.77 15,741 32.07 18,484 37.65 Mar 10,188 19.40 10,665 20.30 11,085 21.10 12,857 24.48 14,153 26.94 16,344 31.11 19,191 36.53 Apr 11,331 26.84 11,831 28.03 12,281 29.09 14,008 33.19 15,287 36.22 17,413 41.25 20,161 47.76 May 12,896 31.29 13,466 32.67 13,977 33.91 15,943 38.68 17,399 42.22 19,818 48.08 22,946 55.67 Jun 15,261 46.80 15,935 48.87 16,540 50.73 18,867 57.86 20,590 63.15 23,453 71.93 27,154 83.28 Jul 21,276 54.34 22,216 56.74 23,060 58.89 26,303 67.18 28,705 73.31 32,696 83.50 37,856 96.68 Aug 22,044 56.47 23,018 58.96 23,892 61.20 27,253 69.81 29,742 76.18 33,877 86.78 39,223 100.47 Sep 17,603 52.89 18,380 55.22 19,078 57.32 21,762 65.38 23,749 71.35 27,051 81.27 31,320 94.10 Oct 18,300 47.96 19,156 50.20 19,911 52.18 23,094 60.53 25,421 66.63 29,356 76.94 34,470 90.34 Nov 10,110 19.76 10,583 20.68 11,001 21.50 12,759 24.94 14,045 27.45 16,219 31.70 19,044 37.22 Dec 11,315 20.64 11,844 21.60 12,312 22.45 14,280 26.04 15,719 28.67 18,151 33.10 21,314 38.87 TOTAL: 170,987 178,725 185,621 213,204 233,515 267,525 311,603 Summer Peak (MW) 56.47 58.96 61.20 69.81 76.18 86.78 100.47 Winter Peak (MW) 47.96 50.20 52.18 60.53 66.63 76.94 90.34 Total Load
for Month
(MWh)
Peak
MW
Total Load
for Month
(MWh)
Peak
MW
Total Load
for Month
(MWh)
Peak
MW
Total Load
for Month
(MWh)
Peak
MW
Total Load
for Month
(MWh)
Peak
MW
Total Load
for Month
(MWh)
Peak
MW
Total Load
for Month
(MWh)
Peak
MW
Jan 22,332 41.03 24,806 45.58 26,704 49.06 28,498 52.36 30,229 55.54 31,967 58.73 32,833 60.32 Feb 20,195 41.14 22,433 45.70 24,149 49.19 25,772 52.50 27,337 55.69 28,909 58.89 29,692 60.49 Mar 20,968 39.92 23,291 44.34 25,073 47.73 26,758 50.94 28,383 54.03 30,016 57.14 30,829 58.69 Apr 21,899 51.88 24,155 57.22 25,902 61.36 27,558 65.29 29,160 69.08 30,771 72.90 31,610 74.88 May 24,924 60.47 27,492 66.70 29,480 71.53 31,365 76.10 33,188 80.53 35,021 84.97 35,976 87.29 Jun 29,495 90.46 32,534 99.78 34,886 106.99 37,117 113.83 39,275 120.45 41,444 127.10 42,574 130.57 Jul 41,121 105.02 45,356 115.84 48,637 124.21 51,746 132.15 54,755 139.84 57,779 147.56 59,354 151.58 Aug 42,606 109.14 46,994 120.38 50,393 129.08 53,615 137.34 56,732 145.32 59,866 153.35 61,498 157.53 Sep 34,021 102.21 37,526 112.74 40,239 120.90 42,812 128.63 45,301 136.11 47,803 143.62 49,107 147.54 Oct 37,662 98.71 41,835 109.64 45,036 118.03 48,061 125.96 50,981 133.62 53,913 141.30 55,373 145.13 Nov 20,808 40.66 23,113 45.17 24,882 48.63 26,553 51.89 28,166 55.05 29,786 58.21 30,593 59.79 Dec 23,287 42.47 25,867 47.17 27,847 50.78 29,718 54.20 31,523 57.49 33,336 60.79 34,239 62.44 TOTAL: 339,319 375,401 403,228 429,573 455,032 480,611 493,678 Summer Peak (MW) 109.14 120.38 129.08 137.34 145.32 153.35 157.53 Winter Peak (MW) 98.71 109.64 118.03 125.96 133.62 141.30 145.13 Total Load
for Month
(MWh)
Peak
MW
Total Load
for Month
(MWh)
Peak
MW
Total Load
for Month
(MWh)
Peak
MW
Total Load
for Month
(MWh)
Peak
MW
Total Load
for Month
(MWh)
Peak
MW
Total Load
for Month
(MWh)
Peak
MW
Total Load
for Month
(MWh)
Peak
MW
Jan 33,707 61.93 34,588 63.55 34,939 64.19 35,298 64.85 35,666 65.53 36,042 66.22 36,426 66.93 Feb 30,483 62.10 31,280 63.72 31,597 64.37 31,922 65.03 32,254 65.70 32,594 66.40 32,941 67.10 Mar 31,649 60.25 32,477 61.82 32,806 62.45 33,143 63.09 33,488 63.75 33,841 64.42 34,202 65.11 Apr 32,457 76.89 33,314 78.92 33,702 79.84 34,099 80.78 34,506 81.75 34,923 82.73 35,350 83.74 May 36,941 89.63 37,915 91.99 38,357 93.07 38,810 94.16 39,273 95.29 39,747 96.44 40,233 97.62 Jun 43,716 134.07 44,869 137.61 45,392 139.21 45,927 140.85 46,475 142.53 47,037 144.25 47,611 146.02 Jul 60,946 155.65 62,554 159.76 63,283 161.62 64,029 163.52 64,793 165.47 65,575 167.47 66,377 169.52 Aug 63,146 161.75 64,813 166.02 65,568 167.95 66,341 169.93 67,133 171.96 67,943 174.04 68,774 176.17 Sep 50,423 151.49 51,754 155.49 52,357 157.30 52,974 159.16 53,606 161.06 54,254 163.00 54,917 164.99 Oct 56,847 148.99 58,333 152.88 58,925 154.44 59,531 156.02 60,150 157.65 60,784 159.31 61,432 161.01 Nov 31,407 61.38 32,228 62.98 32,555 63.62 32,890 64.28 33,232 64.95 33,582 65.63 33,941 66.33 Dec 35,150 64.10 36,069 65.78 36,435 66.45 36,809 67.13 37,192 67.83 37,584 68.54 37,985 69.27 TOTAL: 506,871 520,193 525,915 531,773 537,769 543,906 550,188 Summer Peak (MW) 161.75 166.02 167.95 169.93 171.96 174.04 176.17 Winter Peak (MW) 148.99 152.88 154.44 156.02 157.65 159.31 161.01 2044 2045
Projected Load Data 2039-2045
2039 2040 2041 2042 2043
2038
Projected Load Data 2032-2038
2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037
Projected Load Data 2025 - 2031
2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031
5-18
326 704
0 50
300250200150100
'19 '20 '21 '22 '23 '24 '25 '26 '27 '28 '29 '30 '31 '32 '33 '34 '35 '36 '37 '38 '39 '40 '41 '42 '43 '44 '45 MWH (x1,000)
YEAR

BANNING ELECTRIC UTILTIY MWH PURCHASES

HISTORICAL

FORECAST

2.4% ANNUAL GROWTH
RATE
5-19
327 705
0 5,000
30,00025,00020,00015,00010,000
'20 '21 '22 '23 '24 '25 '26 '27 '28 '29 '30 '31 '32 '33 '34 '35 '36 '37 '38 '39 '40 '41 '42 '43 '44 '45 kW
YEAR
SAN GORGONIO TOTAL kW DEMAND

SUMMER-HISTORICAL

WINTER-HISTORICAL

WINTER-FORECAST

1.7% ANNUAL GROWTH
RATE

SUMMER-FORECAST

1.7% ANNUAL GROWTH
RATE
5-20
328 706
0 5,000
30,00025,00020,00015,00010,000
'20 '21 '22 '23 '24 '25 '26 '27 '28 '29 '30 '31 '32 '33 '34 '35 '36 '37 '38 '39 '40 '41 '42 '43 '44 '45 kW
YEAR
MIDWAY TOTAL kW DEMAND

SUMMER-HISTORICAL

WINTER-HISTORICAL

SUMMER-FORECAST

2.7% ANNUAL GROWTH
RATE

WINTER-FORECAST

2.7% ANNUAL GROWTH
RATE
5-21
329 707
0 8,0006,0004,0002,000
14,00012,00010,000
'20 '21 '22 '23 '24 '25 '26 '27 '28 '29 '30 '31 '32 '33 '34 '35 '36 '37 '38 '39 '40 '41 '42 '43 '44 '45 kW
YEAR
22ND STREET kW DEMAND

SUMMER-HISTORICAL

WINTER-HISTORICAL

WINTER-FORECAST

1.1% ANNUAL GROWTH
RATE

SUMMER-FORECAST

1.1% ANNUAL GROWTH
RATE
5-22
330 708
0 8,0006,0004,0002,000
12,00010,000
'20 '21 '22 '23 '24 '25 '26 '27 '28 '29 '30 '31 '32 '33 '34 '35 '36 '37 '38 '39 '40 '41 '42 '43 '44 '45 kW
YEAR
STAGECOACH kW DEMAND

SUMMER-HISTORICAL

WINTER-HISTORICAL

WINTER-FORECAST

2.0% ANNUAL GROWTH
RATE

SUMMER-FORECAST

2.0% ANNUAL GROWTH
RATE
5-23
331 709
0 9,0008,0007,0006,0005,0004,0003,0002,0001,000
'20 '21 '22 '23 '24 '25 '26 '27 '28 '29 '30 '31 '32 '33 '34 '35 '36 '37 '38 '39 '40 '41 '42 '43 '44 '45 kW
YEAR
IVY kW DEMAND

SUMMER-HISTORICAL

WINTER-HISTORICAL

WINTER-FORECAST

2.0% ANNUAL GROWTH
RATE

SUMMER-FORECAST

2.0% ANNUAL GROWTH
RATE
5-24
332 710
0 5,000
30,00025,00020,00015,00010,000
'20 '21 '22 '23 '24 '25 '26 '27 '28 '29 '30 '31 '32 '33 '34 '35 '36 '37 '38 '39 '40 '41 '42 '43 '44 '45 kW
YEAR
SUNSET kW DEMAND

SUMMER-HISTORICAL

WINTER-HISTORICAL

WINTER-FORECAST

4.5% ANNUAL GROWTH
RATE

SUMMER-FORECAST

4.3% ANNUAL GROWTH
RATE
5-25
333 711

CITY OF BANNING ELECTRIC UTILITY

ELECTRIC SERVICE MASTER PLAN
5-YEAR CIP

5.4 – Overhead Maintenance Program
The Overhead Maintenance Program include the routine inspection and replacement of poles on the sub-transmission and distribution circuits on the BEU system.

It is projected that BEU will inspect 15 poles per week for the years 2026 thru 2030. This totals to 780 poles inspected per year and 3,900 poles inspected for the duration of the 5-Year CIP. An estimated cost of $270 per pole inspection was used and a 3% inflation to this cost was assumed per year starting in 2027. The total estimated cost for pole inspections for the 5-Year CIP is $1,151,647.

It is projected that BEU will replace 50 poles per year for the years 2026 thru 2028 and 100 poles per year for the years 2029 and 2030. This totals to 350 poles replaced for the duration of the 5- Year CIP. An estimated cost of $7,520 per pole replacement was used and a 3% inflation to this cost was assumed per year starting in 2027. The total estimated cost for pole replacements for the 5-Year CIP is $2,906,791.

The total estimated cost for the Overhead Maintenance Program for the 5-year CIP is $4,058,438.

The table below shows a breakdown of the Overhead Maintenance Program.

Table 5.4-1 – Overhead Maintenance Program Costs
2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Total
Number of Poles
Inspected 780 780 780 780 780 3,900
Cost per
Inspection 278 286 295 304 313 -
Total Cost of
Inspection $216,918 $223,426 $230,128 $237,032 $244,143 $1,151,647 Number of Poles
Replaced 50 50 50 100 100 350
Cost per
Replacement $7,746 $7,978 $8,217 $8,422 $8,675 -
Total Cost of
Replacement $387,280 $398,898 $410,865 $842,240 $867,507 $2,906,791 Total Overhead
Maintenance
Program
$604,198 $622,324 $640,994 $1,079,272 $1,111,650 $4,058,438 5-26
334 712

CITY OF BANNING ELECTRIC UTILITY

ELECTRIC SERVICE MASTER PLAN
5-YEAR CIP

5.5 – Capital Maintenance Projects
BEU has identified 18 Capital Maintenance projects to include in the 5-year CIP. The total estimated cost for these projects is $20,784,500. It is projected that BEU will receive $9,293,750 in contributions in aid to these projects bringing the total BEU funding cost to $11,490,750.

The following tables list the Capital Maintenance projects that have been identified for inclusion to the 5-year CIP.

Table 5.5-1 – Capital Maintenance Project Costs
Project Description Year Total Cost CIAC
BEU
Funding
Cost
Underground Conversion Livingston to
Hargrave (Backbone/Fiber loop at
Ramsey/Livingston/Alola)
2027-
2028 $149,500 $0 $149,500
Underground Conductor Replacement
Barbour St E/O Hathaway 2027 $275,000 $0 $275,000
Underground Conductor Replacement at
Mockingbird Lane and Hillside Dr 2027 $750,000 $0 $750,000 Underground Conductor Replacement at
Westward Ave from 4th St to 8th St 2027 $625,000 $0 $625,000 Fiber Extension to Stagecoach
Substation (UG and OH) 2027 $285,000 $0 $285,000
Midway Substation Upgrades (breaker
replacement and SCADA-ready
upgrades and future full replacement)
2027-
2030 $6,125,000 $0 $6,125,000

34.5 kV/12.47 kV (Cir 77)/fiber UG and
OH Extension to Sunset Ave 2029 $2,000,0001 $1,200,000 $800,000 SoCalGas Reimbursement for Feeder
Circuits to Cottonwood Ave 2027 TBD 100% $0
1 Up to 60% contribution from WKJ Development
5-27
335 713

CITY OF BANNING ELECTRIC UTILITY

ELECTRIC SERVICE MASTER PLAN
5-YEAR CIP
Table 5.5-1 – Capital Maintenance Project Costs (continued) Project Description Year Total Cost CIAC
BEU
Funding
Cost
Underground Conductor Replacement
at Vista Serena Ave 2029 $350,000 $175,0002 $175,000
Fire Mitigation Tier 2/3 High Threat Area
(Various)
2026-
2028 $450,000 $0 $450,000
Mias Canyon Line Hardening 2027 $2,100,000 $2,100,0003 $0

34.5 kV/12.47 kV/fiber Underground
Circuits Hathaway St from Williams St
to Hoffer St
2029-
2030 $2,000,000 $2,000,0004 $0

34.5 kV/12.47 kV/fiber Underground
Circuits Lincoln St to John St
2027,
2029 $150,000 $0 $150,000
Install Two (2) Engineered base-plate
pole at Sunset and Lincoln
2028-
2029 $850,000 $0 $850,000
Install Reclosers on 34.5 kV and 12.47
kV system 2028 $250,000 $0 $250,000
Robertson's Ready Mix Circuit Re-route 2026-
2028 $425,000 $318,7505 $106,250
Sun Lakes Blvd Extension - Electric
Relocation
2026-
2028 $3,500,000 $3,500,0006 $0
2 Up to 50% contribution from Vista Serena Developer
3 100% grant funded
4 100% funded from Sansone Group and First Hathaway Industrial 5 Up to 75% contribution from Robertson’s Ready Mix
6 100% Public Works funded
5-28
336 714

CITY OF BANNING ELECTRIC UTILITY

ELECTRIC SERVICE MASTER PLAN
5-YEAR CIP
Table 5.5-1 – Capital Maintenance Project Costs (continued) Project Description Year Total Cost CIAC
BEU
Funding
Cost
SCE Upfront Capital Costs 2028 $500,000 $0 $500,000
$20,784,500 $9,293,750 $11,490,750
The following pages contain the CIP worksheets as provided by BEU. 5-29
337 715

CITY OF BANNING
5 YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (FY 2027- 2031)
Project Benefit:

Project Budget:

Design/Engineering/Enviro.

Right of Way Acquisition
Construction Support (e.g. survey, soils, etc.)
Construction Management/Inspections
Construction
Total

Funds FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 FY 2031

Funds
$149,500 $9,500 $140,000
$149,500 $9,500 $140,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
Engineering
Project Title:

Complete distribution circuit ties between San Gorgonio Substation and Stagecoach Substation that will provide electric distribution to the area that had been previously served by the decommissioned Alola Substation. This project will include short distance line extensions, installation of PME switches, and fiber optic cable installation.

Estimated Completion Date:

Underground Conversion Livingston to Hargrave (Backbone/Fiber loop at Ramsey/Livingston/Alola ) 12/1/2027
Project Description:

Provides added redundancy and resiliency to distribution service in the northeast section of BEU's service territory.

Project Status: Photo/Exhibit/Vicinity Map
Currently in design; construction phase is tentatively scheduled to commence construction during FY 26/27 and will conclude in FY 27/28.

Budget Distribution Est. Amount
$9,500
$0
$0
$5,000
$135,000
$149,500
Electric Revenue $149,500
$0
Funding Source Total
Funding Plan:
$0
Brandon Robinson, Electric Engineering Supervisor
Total $149,500
Department: Division: Contacts:

Electric Fred Lyn, Deputy Electric Utility Director
5-30
338 716

CITY OF BANNING
5 YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (FY 2027- 2031)
Project Benefit:

Project Budget:

Design/Engineering/Enviro.

Right of Way Acquisition
Construction Support (e.g. survey, soils, etc.)
Construction Management/Inspections
Construction
Total

Funds FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 FY 2031

Funds
$275,000 $275,000
$275,000 $275,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Engineering
Brandon Robinson, Electric Engineering Supervisor
Project Description:

Complete 12.47kV conversion for four service at 700 S. Hathaway St. Decommission Airport Substation.

Funding Plan:

Division: Contacts:
$0
$0
$275,000
Department:

Electric Fred Lyn, Deputy Electric Utility Director
Total
Project Title: Estimated Completion Date:

Funding Source Total
$275,000
This project will conclude the 12kV Conversion project that has taken BEU nearly 50 years to complete. This will provide stable service reliability in the area.

Est. Amount
Photo/Exhibit/Vicinity Map Project Status:

Currently in design; construction phase is tentatively scheduled to commence construction during FY 26/27.

Underground Conversion Barbour St (12kV Conversion at 700 S. Hathaway) 12/1/2026 Budget Distribution
Electric Revenue
$275,000
$20,000
$0
$0
$5,000
$250,000
5-31
339 717

CITY OF BANNING
5 YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (FY 2027- 2031)
Project Benefit:

Project Budget:

Design/Engineering/Enviro.

Right of Way Acquisition
Construction Support (e.g. survey, soils, etc.)
Construction Management/Inspections
Construction
Total

Funds FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 FY 2031

Funds
$750,000 $750,000
$750,000 $750,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Engineering
Project Title:

Complete reconductoring on Hillside Dr and Mockingbird Ln.

Estimated Completion Date:

Underground Conductor Replacement - Mockingbird & Hillside 12/1/2026 Project Description:

This project will address replacement of antiquated unjacketed cable in BEU's system. The unjacketed cable has become obsolete and is prone to greater percentage of fault occurrence, which leads to longer customer outages.

Project Status: Photo/Exhibit/Vicinity Map
The initial phase of this project was completed in 2023 due to the occurrence of a fault on an unjacketed primary distribution conductor within the project area; the final phase of construction phase is tentatively scheduled to commence during FY 26/27.

Budget Distribution Est. Amount
$55,000
$0
$0
$18,000
$677,000
$750,000
Electric Revenue $750,000
$0
Funding Source Total
Funding Plan:
$0
Brandon Robinson, Electric Engineering Supervisor
Total $750,000
Department: Division: Contacts:

Electric Fred Lyn, Deputy Electric Utility Director
5-32
340 718

CITY OF BANNING
5 YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (FY 2027- 2031)
Project Benefit:

Project Budget:

Design/Engineering/Enviro.

Right of Way Acquisition
Construction Support (e.g. survey, soils, etc.)
Construction Management/Inspections
Construction
Total

Funds FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 FY 2031

Funds
$625,000 $625,000
$625,000 $625,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Engineering
Project Title:

Complete reconductoring on between Westward Ave and Barbour St, from 4th St to 8th St.

Estimated Completion Date:

Underground Conductor Replacement - Westward Ave to Barbour St, 4th St to 8th St 6/1/2026 Project Description:

Project Status: Photo/Exhibit/Vicinity Map
Some preliminary reconductoring occurred during a 2022 fault event involving unjacketed primary distribution conductor within the project area; construction of all improvements is tentatively scheduled to commence during FY 26/27.

Budget Distribution Est. Amount
$25,000
$0
$0
$10,000
$590,000
$625,000
Electric Revenue $625,000
$0
Funding Source Total
Funding Plan:
$0
Brandon Robinson, Electric Engineering Supervisor
Total $625,000
Department: Division: Contacts:

Electric Fred Lyn, Deputy Electric Utility Director
5-33
341 719

CITY OF BANNING
5 YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (FY 2027- 2031)
Project Benefit:

Project Budget:

Design/Engineering/Enviro.

Right of Way Acquisition
Construction Support (e.g. survey, soils, etc.)
Construction Management/Inspections
Construction
Total

Funds FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 FY 2031

Funds
$285,000 $285,000
$0
$285,000 $285,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Engineering
$0
Brandon Robinson, Electric Engineering Supervisor
Total $285,000
Department: Division: Contacts:

Electric Fred Lyn, Deputy Electric Utility Director
Electric Revenue $285,000
CIAC $0
Funding Source Total
This project will help push BEU toward completion of fiber optic hard line connectivity all six substations for SCADA monitoring and control.

Project Status:

Funding Plan:

Photo/Exhibit/Vicinity Map
In 2022, BEU completed a line extension on Hargrave Street from the site of the decommissioned Alola Substation to the newly built Stagecoach Substation in order to energize the asset and provide service to the northeast portion of BEU's service area.

The design for this pole line extension included provisions for a future utility fiber optic line attachment to support SCADA communication. BEU anticipates construction to commence during FY 26/27, but may be able to be delayed and encumbered into future fiscal year budgets if needed.

Budget Distribution Est. Amount
$15,000
$0
$0
$5,000
$265,000
$285,000
Project Title:

Underground conversion of 34.5kV, 12.47kV and fiber optic circuits thru easement within Banning Airport property from Lincoln St to John St.

Estimated Completion Date:

Fiber Extension to Stagecoach 12/30/2027
Project Description:
5-34
342 720

CITY OF BANNING
5 YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (FY 2027- 2031)
Project Benefit:

Project Budget:

Design/Engineering/Enviro.

Right of Way Acquisition
Construction Support (e.g. survey, soils, etc.)
Construction Management/Inspections
Construction
Total

Funds FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 FY 2031

Funds
$125,000 $75,000 $50,000
$125,000 $75,000 $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
Engineering
Project Title:

Install SCADA RTU and other equipment to make Midway Substation SCADA ready. Replace distribution with spare breakers as needed. This project will also address potential full substation upgrade if direction is to utilize the existing property.

Estimated Completion Date:

Midway Substation Upgrades (breaker replacement and SCADA upgrades) 5/30/2028 Project Description:

Midway is BEU's oldest Substation, built in 1972. Most of the equipment, including the transformers and distribution breakers are original and nearing the end of useful life. The SCADA upgrades will allow remote visibility at the substation, while as-needed breaker replacement will allow the substation to continue operating as intended. The eventual replacement of all equipment at the substation will help conclude modernization of all BEU's substation assets.

Project Status: Photo/Exhibit/Vicinity Map
BEU has began vetting equipment that will be utilized to make Midway Substation SCADA-ready. Construction of this phase is tentatively scheduled to commence during FY 26/27. All other improvements we be evaluated later in the initial 5-yr CIP period.

Budget Distribution Est. Amount
$5,000
$0
$0
$2,500
$117,500
$125,000
Electric Revenue $125,000
$0
Funding Source Total
Funding Plan:
$0
Brandon Robinson, Electric Engineering Supervisor
Total $125,000
Department: Division: Contacts:

Electric Fred Lyn, Deputy Electric Utility Director
5-35
343 721

CITY OF BANNING
5 YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (FY 2027- 2031)
Project Benefit:

Project Budget:

Design/Engineering/Enviro.

Right of Way Acquisition
Construction Support (e.g. survey, soils, etc.)
Construction Management/Inspections
Construction
Total

Funds FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 FY 2031

Funds
$800,000 $800,000
$1,200,000 $1,200,000
$2,000,000 $0 $0 $2,000,000 $0 $0 $0
Engineering
Project Title:

Extend electric sub-transmission and distribution from Mountain Ave to Sunset Ave.

Estimated Completion Date:

34.5kV/12.47kV (Cir 77)/fiber UG and OH Extension to Sunset Ave 6/30/2029 Project Description:

Circuit #77, which originates from Sunset Substation, is terminated in a switch cabinet on Mountain Ave. This circuit was designed to provide distribution services to newer developments along Sunset Ave north of Wilson St. Completing this line extension allows BEU to fulfill this need, while also seeking monetary contributions from these developments thru line extension agreements.

Project Status: Photo/Exhibit/Vicinity Map
BEU has completed a preliminary design of the 12.47kV distribution extension thru the area. Design for the 34.5kV and fiber extension still needs to be completed.

Environmental, survey, and possible ROW acquisition will be required for this project.

Construction is tentatively scheduled to commence during FY 28/29, or as soon as advance on construction is received for from developers in the area that will be served with this line extension.

Budget Distribution Est. Amount
$115,000
$50,000
$75,000
$45,000
$1,715,000
$2,000,000
Electric Revenue $800,000
CIAC (WJK Development) $1,200,000
Funding Source Total
Funding Plan:
$0
Brandon Robinson, Electric Engineering Supervisor
Total $2,000,000
Department: Division: Contacts:

Electric Fred Lyn, Deputy Electric Utility Director
5-36
344 722

CITY OF BANNING
5 YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (FY 2027- 2031)
Project Benefit:

Project Budget:

Design/Engineering/Enviro.

Right of Way Acquisition
Construction Support (e.g. survey, soils, etc.)
Construction Management/Inspections
Construction
Total

Funds FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 FY 2031

Funds
$175,000 $175,000
$175,000 $175,000
$350,000 $175,000 $0 $175,000 $0 $0 $0
Engineering
Project Title:

Complete reconductoring of unjacketed cable in the Vista Serena development in conjunction with an ongoing development-driven project to complete buildout of the complex.

Estimated Completion Date:

Underground Conductor Replacement at Vista Serena 6/30/2029 Project Description:

Project Status: Photo/Exhibit/Vicinity Map
BEU has completed minor reconductoring within Vista Serena that had come as a result of outages created by cable fault/failure. Design for the complete distribution upgrades to serve the development is in progress. The developer will have a cost responsibility for new line extensions within the development, as well as replacement of some of the existing unjacketed cable. Construction is tentatively scheduled to commence during FY 26/27, or as soon as advance on construction is received from the developer.

Completion of all remaining reconductoring outside of developer requirements will occur during FY 28/29.

Budget Distribution Est. Amount
$6,500
$0
$0
$15,000
$328,500
$350,000
Electric Revenue $175,000
CIAC (Vista Serena) $175,000
Funding Source Total
Funding Plan:
$0
Brandon Robinson, Electric Engineering Supervisor
Total $350,000
Department: Division: Contacts:

Electric Fred Lyn, Deputy Electric Utility Director
5-37
345 723

CITY OF BANNING
5 YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (FY 2027- 2031)
Project Benefit:

Project Budget:

Design/Engineering/Enviro.

Right of Way Acquisition
Construction Support (e.g. survey, soils, etc.)
Construction Management/Inspections
Construction
Total

Funds FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 FY 2031

Funds
$450,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000
$0
$450,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $0 $0 $0
Engineering
$0
Brandon Robinson, Electric Engineering Supervisor
Total $450,000
Department: Division: Contacts:

Electric Fred Lyn, Deputy Electric Utility Director
Electric Revenue $450,000
CIAC $0
Funding Source Total
This project will assist with the continued monitoring and operation of the electric distribution facilities within the HFTD Tiers 2 & 3 areas. The California Public Utility Commission's Wildfire Safety Advisory Board (WSAB) recommended that utilities with electric transmission or distribution facilities in HFTDs make tangible improvements to the monitoring and operation of these facilities to reduce wildfire risk.

Project Status:

Funding Plan:

Photo/Exhibit/Vicinity Map
BEU has been required to submit a Wildfire Mitigation Plan for review to the WSAB each year since 2020. Within this time, BEU has completed minor improvements to facilities in Banning Canyon (water canyon) and has applied for grant funding to upgrade facilities within Mias Canyon. BEU is obligated to continue fire mitigation efforts, and has identified the use of reclosers as a high priority solution for circuits that enter the HFTD. BEU anticipates construction to begin during FY 26/27, and continue annually until grid hardening solutions have been met. BEU will continue to search for and apply for grant funding to offset revenue expenditures.

Budget Distribution Est. Amount
$25,000
$0
$0
$5,000
$420,000
$450,000
Project Title:

BEU will complete improvements to control of electricity in the Tiers 2 & 3 High Fire Threat District (HFTD). BEU will begin with the installation of distribution circuit reclosers to allow power to be shut off to these areas in the event that an imminent threat to public safety becomes present.

Estimated Completion Date:

Fire Mitigation Improvements in High Fire Threat District 6/30/2029 Project Description:
5-38
346 724

CITY OF BANNING
5 YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (FY 2027- 2031)
Project Benefit:

Project Budget:

Design/Engineering/Enviro.

Right of Way Acquisition
Construction Support (e.g. survey, soils, etc.)
Construction Management/Inspections
Construction
Total

Funds FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 FY 2031

Funds
$0
$2,100,000 $2,100,000
$2,100,000 $2,100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Engineering
$2,100,000
$45,000
$1,860,000
Funding Plan:

Funding Source Total
Electric Revenue $0
CIAC (Grant)
Brandon Robinson, Electric Engineering Supervisor
Total $2,100,000
Department: Division: Contacts:

Electric Fred Lyn, Deputy Electric Utility Director
Project Status:

Photo/Exhibit/Vicinity Map
The result from the Apple Fire in 2020 prompted BUE to search for funding to complete much needed upgrades/line hardening in areas within the service territory that are most susceptible to fire ignition. BEU began the design and grant application process for this project in 2021, and is currently awaiting funding after various design and environmental clearance activities. This project will be grant-funded thru the federal government's Hazard Mitigation Grant Program at 75% of total project cost, with 25% matching contributions form California Governor's Office of Emergency Services (CalOES) to complete the full 100% funding. Construction start for this project is dependent upon the grant funding during FY 26/27, in which BEU will be given 24 months to complete.

Budget Distribution Est. Amount
$185,000
$0
$10,000
$2,100,000
Project Title:

This project involves replacing 75 utility poles with new fire retardant-treated poles; replacing wooden crossarms on poles with fiberglass crossarms; installing insulated/covered wire and jumpers; installing covered insulators; installing line protection measures; and completing hazardous fuels reduction.

This project will help provide redundancy on our 34.5kV and 12.47kV and assist providing a point of connection to the 34.5kV system for the proposed substation to support expansion in the eastern part of the City.

Estimated Completion Date:

Mias Canyon Line Hardening 12/30/2028
Project Description:
5-39
347 725

CITY OF BANNING
5 YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (FY 2027- 2031)
Project Benefit:

Project Budget:

Design/Engineering/Enviro.

Right of Way Acquisition
Construction Support (e.g. survey, soils, etc.)
Construction Management/Inspections
Construction
Total

Funds FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 FY 2031

Funds
$2,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000
$2,000,000 $0 $0 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $0 $0
Engineering
Project Title:

Underground conversion of 34.5kV, 12.47kV and fiber optic circuits on Hathaway St and new utility service extensions to accomodate new industrial development.

This project is fully dependent on the completion of this development.

Estimated Completion Date:

34.5kV/12.47kV/fiber Underground Circuits Hathaway St from Williams St to Hoffer St 6/30/2030 Project Description:

This project will accommodate street improvements required by the Sansone Group and First Hathaway Industrial warehouse developments. This will also assist with beautification of the eastern corridor due to the undergrounding of BEU utilities.

Project Status: Photo/Exhibit/Vicinity Map
BEU has completed UG conversion of facilities from Ramsey St to Williams St along Hathaway St in 2022. Design for this project is in progress. The developers will have a full responsibility for relocation/conversion along Hathaway St and new line extensions within the development. Construction is tentatively scheduled to commence during FY 28/29, or as soon as advance on construction is received from the developer.

Budget Distribution Est. Amount
$55,000
$0
$0
$35,000
$1,910,000
$2,000,000
Electric Revenue $0
CIAC (Sansone/First Hathaway) $2,000,000
Funding Source Total
Funding Plan:
$0
Brandon Robinson, Electric Engineering Supervisor
Total $2,000,000
Department: Division: Contacts:

Electric Fred Lyn, Deputy Electric Utility Director
5-40
348 726

CITY OF BANNING
5 YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (FY 2027- 2031)
Project Benefit:

Project Budget:

Design/Engineering/Enviro.

Right of Way Acquisition
Construction Support (e.g. survey, soils, etc.)
Construction Management/Inspections
Construction
Total

Funds FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 FY 2031

Funds
$175,000 $20,000 $130,000
$0
$175,000 $20,000 $0 $130,000 $0 $0 $0
Engineering
Project Title:

Underground conversion of 34.5kV, 12.47kV and fiber optic circuits thru easement within Banning Airport property from Lincoln St to John St.

Estimated Completion Date:

34.5kV/12.47kV/fiber Underground Circuits Lincoln St to John St 6/30/2029 Project Description:

Project Status: Photo/Exhibit/Vicinity Map
In 2015, BEU completed a line extension thru an existing utility easement on the airport property to accommodate future redundancy needs. BEU has also completed UG line extensions to new facilities in the area which began in 2021. As the City continues to build out, more capacity will be needed in East Banning. Design for this project should begin early 2027. There may be a design/construction cost responsibility for future developers, but that cost is still unknown. BEU anticipates construction to commence during FY 28/29, as the need for additional capacity may become a requirement.

Budget Distribution Est. Amount
$20,000
$0
$0
$5,000
$125,000
$150,000
Electric Revenue $150,000
CIAC $0
Funding Source Total
Funding Plan:
$0
Brandon Robinson, Electric Engineering Supervisor
Total $150,000
Department: Division: Contacts:

Electric Fred Lyn, Deputy Electric Utility Director
5-41
349 727

CITY OF BANNING
5 YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (FY 2027- 2031)
Project Benefit:

Project Budget:

Design/Engineering/Enviro.

Right of Way Acquisition
Construction Support (e.g. survey, soils, etc.)
Construction Management/Inspections
Construction
Total

Funds FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 FY 2031

Funds
$850,000 $425,000 $425,000
$0
$850,000 $0 $425,000 $425,000 $0 $0 $0
Engineering
$0
Brandon Robinson, Electric Engineering Supervisor
Total $850,000
Department: Division: Contacts:

Electric Fred Lyn, Deputy Electric Utility Director
Electric Revenue $850,000
CIAC $0
Funding Source Total
This project will provide a much needed infrastructure upgrade for a critical 69/34.5kV/12.47kV/fiber pole line that contains the capacity to support 2/3 of BEU's total energy demand. This pole line carries transmission to Midway and Subset Substations which account for the largest loads within BEU's service territory.

Project Status:

Funding Plan:

Photo/Exhibit/Vicinity Map
In 2014, BEU completed a relocation of the steel pole transmission line at Sunset Ave and Lincoln Street. The final phase of this project was to be completed prior to 2017, however budget constraints prevented the completion of the project. There may be a design/construction cost responsibility for future developers, but that cost is still unknown. BEU anticipates construction to commence during FY 28/29, which is anticipated to coincide with commercial development within the area.

Budget Distribution Est. Amount
$60,000
$0
$50,000
$35,000
$705,000
$850,000
Project Title:

Installation of two engineer-base steel pole to support 69/ 34.5kV, 12.47kV and fiber optic circuits on the west side of Sunset Ave north of Lincoln St.

Estimated Completion Date:

Engineered Base-Plate Poles at Sunset and Lincoln 6/30/2029 Project Description:
5-42
350 728

CITY OF BANNING
5 YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (FY 2027- 2031)
Project Benefit:

Project Budget:

Design/Engineering/Enviro.

Right of Way Acquisition
Construction Support (e.g. survey, soils, etc.)
Construction Management/Inspections
Construction
Total

Funds FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 FY 2031

Funds
$250,000 $250,000
$250,000 $0 $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
Engineering
$0
Brandon Robinson, Electric Engineering Supervisor
Total $250,000
Department: Division: Contacts:

Electric Fred Lyn, Deputy Electric Utility Director
Electric Revenue $250,000
CIAC (Grant) $0
Funding Source Total
This project will allow BEU to improve redundancy and reliability within the system by isolating outages to a smaller area and reduce power restoration times.

Project Status:

Funding Plan:

Photo/Exhibit/Vicinity Map
Planning and equipment research for this project began in 2022 and will continue with the completion of a system impact study of the current electric grid. BEU will vet different equipment manufacturers and determine the best method for initiating the pilot. The project will be constructed using BEU's in-house power line construction services. The pilot will include investigation and implementation of distribution automation (DA) solutions to provide communication with the field devices that are installed. BEU anticipates this pilot to begin in FY 27/28.

Budget Distribution Est. Amount
$35,000
$0
$0
$5,000
$210,000
$250,000
Project Title:

BEU will complete a pilot project to install reclosers and other sectionalizing devices on the distribution and sub-transmission system.

Estimated Completion Date:

Install Reclosers on 34.5 kV and 12.47 kV system 6/30/2028 Project Description:
5-43
351 729

CITY OF BANNING
5 YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (FY 2027- 2031)
Project Benefit:

Project Budget:

Design/Engineering/Enviro.

Right of Way Acquisition
Construction Support (e.g. survey, soils, etc.)
Construction Management/Inspections
Construction
Total

Funds FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 FY 2031

Funds
$106,250 $106,250
$318,750 $318,750
$425,000 $318,750 $106,250 $0 $0 $0 $0
Engineering
$0
Brandon Robinson, Electric Engineering Supervisor
Total $425,000
Department: Division: Contacts:

Electric Fred Lyn, Deputy Electric Utility Director
Electric Revenue $106,250
CIAC $318,750
Funding Source Total
This project will be required to rebuild BEU's distribution circuit around Robertson's Ready Mix's expanded mining site that was previously removed. BEU will regain the loss in capacity and redundancy in the system be completing this circuit re-build.

Project Status:

Funding Plan:

Photo/Exhibit/Vicinity Map
BEU is negotiating a line extension agreement with Roberston's Ready Mix to complete the circuit re-route around the expanded mining area north of Hoffer St and west of Hathaway St. BEU has already completed removal of utility poles in conflict with the new mining activities in anticipation of beginning the construction of the circuit re-rout by 2025. There will be a design/construction cost responsibility for Robertson's that will total 75% or more of total project costs. BEU anticipates construction to commence during FY 26/27 and be completed in the following fiscal year.

Budget Distribution Est. Amount
$65,000
$0
$0
$15,000
$345,000
$425,000
Project Title:

Re-route/rebuild of 34.5kV, 12.47kV and fiber optic circuits around the Robertson's Ready Mix mining site.

Estimated Completion Date:

Robertson's Ready Mix Circuit Re-route 6/30/2028
Project Description:
5-44
352 730

CITY OF BANNING
5 YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (FY 2027- 2031)
Project Benefit:

Project Budget:

Design/Engineering/Enviro.

Right of Way Acquisition
Construction Support (e.g. survey, soils, etc.)
Construction Management/Inspections
Construction
Total

Funds FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 FY 2031

Funds
$0
$3,500,000 $2,500,000 $1,000,000
$3,500,000 $2,500,000 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
Engineering
$0
Brandon Robinson, Electric Engineering Supervisor
Total $3,500,000
Department: Division: Contacts:

Electric Fred Lyn, Deputy Electric Utility Director
Electric Revenue $0
CIAC (Grant) $3,500,000
Funding Source Total
This project will accommodate roadway improvements to connect Sun Lakes Blvd from Highland Home Road to Sunset Ave.

Project Status:

Funding Plan:

Photo/Exhibit/Vicinity Map
Planning and field investigation for this project started in 2021. BEU completed a design to convert overhead facilities to underground construction to accommodate the roadway extension. The project was bid to a construction contractor and approved by City Council in late 2025. Since BEU is obligated to continue fire mitigation efforts, improvements to the overhead infrastructure that will remain will include line hardening elements to protect from and prevent wildfire in the HFTD. BEU anticipates construction to begin toward the end of FY 26/27, and continue thru FY 27/28. Electric improvements for this project will be grant funded.

Budget Distribution Est. Amount
$125,000
$0
$0
$50,000
$3,325,000
$3,500,000
Project Title:

BEU will relocate transmission, distribution, and fiber optic infrastructure on Westward Ave/Sun Lakes Blvd due to roadway improvements. This project will include both underground conversion and overhead line hardening as these improvements will occur in the Tier 2 High Fire Threat District (HFTD).

Estimated Completion Date:

Sun Lakes Blvd Extension - Electric Relocation 12/30/2027 Project Description:
5-45
353 731

CITY OF BANNING ELECTRIC UTILITY

ELECTRIC SERVICE MASTER PLAN
5-YEAR CIP

5.6 – Substation Capacity Analysis
The table below represents the substation capacity analysis based on the 2030 substation demand forecast. As shown in the table, the Midway, San Gorgonio, and Sunset summer forecast exceeds the base rating of their respective transformer; however, the forecast does not exceed the max rating of the transformer, therefore, no substation improvements are required in the 5- Year CIP.

The table also shows that the BEU system non-coincident peak exceeds the SCE Banning substation transformer base capacity for the summer and winter forecast and also the max capacity in the summer. Based on the non-coincident forecast, the total BEU system load is expected to exceed the max capacity by the summer of 2026. It is recommended that BEU continue to coordinate with SCE on the substation transformer capacity and develop a plan to increase the substation transformer capacity through the end of the forecast period.

Table 5.6-1 – Substation Capacity Analysis
2030 Transformer Transformer Transformer Transformer Transformer Transformer kW
Demand Base Max High Side Low Side % Capacity % Capacity Forecast MVA MVA kV kV Base Max
22nd Street
S 11,270 15 25 34.4 12.47 75% 45%
W 8,672 18 29 48% 30%
Ivy
S 6,598 15 25 69x34.4 12.47 44% 26%
W 5,604 18 29 31% 19%
Midway
S 17,197 2 x 7.5 2 x 9.375 34.4 12.47 115% 92%
W 11,040 18 22 61% 51%
San
Gorgonio
S 21,465 2 x 10 2 x 14 69x34.5 12.47 107% 77%
W 19,809 24 32 83% 62%
Stagecoach
S 7,397 10 12.5 69x34.5 12.47 74% 59%
W 4,196 12 14 35% 29%
Sunset
S 15,077 15 25 69x34.5 12.47 101% 60%
W 10,064 18 29 56% 35%
SCEBanning
S 63,576 2 x 21 2 x 28 34.5 151% 114%
W 53,737 50.4 64 107% 83%
Notes:

1. Individual substation kW Demand forecast shown as the non-coincident peak.

2. SCE-Banning kW Demand forecast shown as the coincident peak.

3. Base winter rating determined by IEEE C57.91-1995, Table 4 (1% increase per °C)

4. Max winter rating determined by IEEE C57.91-1995, Table 4 (0.75% increase per °C) 5-46
354 732

CITY OF BANNING ELECTRIC UTILITY

ELECTRIC SERVICE MASTER PLAN
5-YEAR CIP

5.7 – Distribution System Analysis
Analysis was run using Milsoft’s Windmil software on the distribution system to determine system improvement projects to correct low voltage, decrease conductor and equipment loading, and reduce single phase line loading to aid in phase balancing. The analysis results include 14 projects to switch load to adjacent lines to reduce single-phase line loading at a total estimated cost of $41,700, 2 projects for new line construction of 600’ totaling $336,400, 9 projects for singlephase to three-phase line rebuild of 10,107’ totaling $2,142,100, and 2 projects for three-phase line rebuild using larger conductor of 2,130’ totaling $285,500. The total estimated cost for distribution system improvements is $2,805,700.

The following pages detail the recommended distribution system improvements by substation and circuit.
5-47
355 733

CITY OF BANNING ELECTRIC UTILITY

ELECTRIC SERVICE MASTER PLAN
5-YEAR CIP
22ND STREET SUBSTATION
CKT 63
CIP-1
Issue: UG146168, 1Ø, #2 URD line with 36 amps, 94 thru consumers.

Resolution: Close switch at vault 143589 at the intersection of Weather Way and Spring Pl. and open at the transformer at pad 146130 at the intersection of Summer Set Cir. and Amper Sky St. and feed load along Autumn Ln. from SW145671-B. Estimated cost: $2,300 (2030).

Image 5.7-1 – CIP Project 1
5-48
356 734

CITY OF BANNING ELECTRIC UTILITY

ELECTRIC SERVICE MASTER PLAN
5-YEAR CIP
CIP-2
Issue: UG33x363, 1Ø, 1/0 URD line with 49 amps, 102 thru consumers.

Resolution: BEU will inspect the facilities at the intersection of Lake Buena Vista Way and Birdie Dr. and switch some of this B phase load along Lake Buena Vista Way west of Birdie Dr. to the 3Ø line that runs along Birdie Dr. Estimated cost: $2,000 (2028).

Image 5.7-2 – CIP Project 2
5-49
357 735

CITY OF BANNING ELECTRIC UTILITY

ELECTRIC SERVICE MASTER PLAN
5-YEAR CIP
CIP-3
Issue: UG29v17, 1Ø, 1/0 URD with 97 amps, 239 thru consumers.

Resolution:
• Close switch at vault 101946 and open at vault 102621 at the intersection of Indian Canyon Dr. and Masters Dr. and backfeed all load north from SW103762-A. • Close switch at pad 103628 and open at pad 103513 to switch load south from pad 103628A.
• Install 3Ø vault at the intersection of Indian Canyon Dr. and Birdie Dr. and change feed of UG33x433 from 3Ø line along Birdie Dr. to feed all load along Indian Canyon Dr. west of Birdie Dr. from the 3Ø vault. Estimated cost: $5,900 (2026).

Image 5.7-3 – CIP Project 3
5-50
358 736

CITY OF BANNING ELECTRIC UTILITY

ELECTRIC SERVICE MASTER PLAN
5-YEAR CIP
CIP-4
Issue: UG18v9, 1Ø, 1/0 URD with 96 amps, 230 thru customers.

Resolution:
• Change feed of line along Bradley St. to feed from 3Ø junction box and connect UG133185 by closing a switch at vault 103523 and open at the intersection of Sawgrass Dr. and Litchfield Ct. to serve all load north of vault 103523. • Backfeed UG109597 from 3Ø UG4550 and open around UG33x474 along Brackenridge Ave. Estimated cost: $4,000 (2027).

Image 5.7-4 – CIP Project 4
CKT 64
Issue: None

IVY SUBSTATION
CKT 11
Issue: None
CKT 12
Issue: None
CKT 13
5-51
359 737

CITY OF BANNING ELECTRIC UTILITY

ELECTRIC SERVICE MASTER PLAN
5-YEAR CIP
Issue: None

MIDWAY SUBSTATION
CKT 21
CIP-5
Issue: UG33x282, 1Ø, #2 URD with 65 amps, 97 thru consumers.

Resolution:
• Construct a new, 300’, 1Ø, 1/0 AL URD primary voltage tie from pad 42503 to pad 42498, crossing W. Pinehurst Dr. and following S. Shoal Creek St. • Open the line at pad 42491 and serve all load to the west from the 1Ø line at S. Shoal Creek St. and Riveria Ave. Estimated cost: $114,600 (2027).

Image 5.7-5 – CIP Project 5
5-52
360 738

CITY OF BANNING ELECTRIC UTILITY

ELECTRIC SERVICE MASTER PLAN
5-YEAR CIP
CIP-6
Issue: UG33x149, 1Ø, 2 URD with 64 amps, 86 thru consumers.

Resolution: Replace 600’ of 1Ø, #2 URD line with 3Ø, 1/0 URD line from vault 36857 along Rivera Ave. just south of Bermuda Dunes Ave to vault 36879 at the intersection of W. Forest Oaks Ave and W. Glen Abbey Way and split the load between multiple phases. Estimated cost: $223,300 (2027).

Image 5.7-6 – CIP Project 6
5-53
361 739

CITY OF BANNING ELECTRIC UTILITY

ELECTRIC SERVICE MASTER PLAN
5-YEAR CIP
CIP-7
Issue: UG117v, 1Ø, #2 URD with 41 amps, 65 thru consumers.

Resolution Construct a new, 600’, 1Ø, 1/0 URD primary voltage tie from vault 41797 to pad 41823. Open at pad 41830 and switch all load southeast of Nicklaus Dr. along Hogan Ave. to feed from pad 41797. Estimated cost: $221,800 (2028).

Image 5.7-7 – CIP Project 7
5-54
362 740

CITY OF BANNING ELECTRIC UTILITY

ELECTRIC SERVICE MASTER PLAN
5-YEAR CIP
CIP-8
Issue: UG33x244, 1Ø, 1/0 URD with 58 amps, 84 thru consumers.

Resolution: Close switch at vault 40252 and open at pad 40237 along Woodland Dr. to split west of Woodland Dr. to feed from vault 40252. Estimated cost: $2,100 (2028).

Image 5.7-8 – CIP Project 8
5-55
363 741

CITY OF BANNING ELECTRIC UTILITY

ELECTRIC SERVICE MASTER PLAN
5-YEAR CIP
CIP-9
Issue: UG33x232, 1Ø, 1/0 URD with 37 amps, 41 thru consumers.

Resolution: Close BØ at pad 40257 along Fairway Oaks Ave. and open Transformer303 at the intersection of Mission Hills Dr. and Cooper Creek Dr. and feed load along Mission Hills Dr. from pad 40257. Estimated cost: $2,100 (2030).

Image 5.7-9 – CIP Project 9
5-56
364 742

CITY OF BANNING ELECTRIC UTILITY

ELECTRIC SERVICE MASTER PLAN
5-YEAR CIP
CIP-10
Issue: UG33x199, 1Ø, 1/0 URD with 100 amps, 98 thru consumers (A phase), UG33x195, 1Ø, 1/0 URD with 114 amps, 162 thru consumers (B phase), and UG33x184, 1Ø, 1/0 URD with 74 amps, 99 thru consumers (C phase).

Resolution:
• Close switch at vault 38245 and open at vault 38212 at the intersection of Spring Hills Cr.

And Sheehan Cir. and backfeed all load west of Sheehan Cir. from vault 38245. • Change the feed of UG33x189 to feed from another phase at the 3Ø vault 38191 at the intersection of Riveria Ave. and Sunningdale St.
• Change feed of UG33x190 to feed from another phase at the 3Ø vault 38240 along Birdie Dr.
• Change feed of UG33x212 to feed from another phase at the 3Ø vault 38191 at the intersection of Riveria Ave. and Sunningdale St.
• Change feed of UG33x211 to feed from the 3Ø pad 38237 at the intersection of Cog Hill Rd. and Breckenridge Ave. and open at pad 38248 and feed all load to the west along Breckenridge Ave. to feed from pad 38237. Estimated cost: $6,700 (2026).

Image 5.7-10 – CIP Project 10
CKT 22
Issue: None
5-57
365 743

CITY OF BANNING ELECTRIC UTILITY

ELECTRIC SERVICE MASTER PLAN
5-YEAR CIP
CKT 23
CIP-11
Issue: UG33x71, 1Ø, 1/0 URD with 37 amps, 77 thru consumers.

Resolution:
• Replace 1,300’ of 1Ø, #2 URD line with 3Ø, 1/0 URD line from pullbox Pb32117 along W.

Wilson St. to vault 32103 at the intersection of Marian Way and Dawn Way. • Close switch at marker M32898 along Beverly Dr. and open at pad 35930 along Evelyn Dr. Estimated cost: $547,600 (2030).

Image 5.7-11 – CIP Project 11
5-58
366 744

CITY OF BANNING ELECTRIC UTILITY

ELECTRIC SERVICE MASTER PLAN
5-YEAR CIP
CKT 24
CIP-12
Issue: UG33x101, 1Ø, 1/0 URD with 61 amps, 93 downline customers.

Resolution: Close switch at pad 34934 and openUG33x118 at pad 34956 the intersection of Twin Hills Dr. and Links Ave. and backfeed load along Big Springs Dr. to feed from 3Ø lie to north at switch pad 34934. Estimated cost: $2,100 (2027).

Image 5.7-12 – CIP Project 12
5-59
367 745

CITY OF BANNING ELECTRIC UTILITY

ELECTRIC SERVICE MASTER PLAN
5-YEAR CIP

SAN GORGONIO SUBSTATION
CKT 51
CIP-13
Issue: OH189362, 1Ø, #4 CU line with 105 amps, 174 thru consumers.

Resolution: Rebuild 1,391’ of 1Ø, #4 Cu line to 3Ø, 1/0 ACSR along W. Nicolet St. from pole number 189371 to pole number 192590. Estimated cost: $172,200 (2026).

Image 5.7-13 – CIP Project 13
5-60
368 746

CITY OF BANNING ELECTRIC UTILITY

ELECTRIC SERVICE MASTER PLAN
5-YEAR CIP
CIP-14
Issue: OH206564, 1Ø, #4 CU line with 68 amps, 106 thru consumers.

Resolution: Rebuild 1,183’ of 1Ø, #4 and #6 CU line to 3Ø, 1/0 ACSR along N. 12th St. from pole number 190013 to pole number 158883. Estimated cost: $148,700 (2027).

Image 5.7-14 – CIP Project 14
CKT 52
Issue: None
5-61
369 747

CITY OF BANNING ELECTRIC UTILITY

ELECTRIC SERVICE MASTER PLAN
5-YEAR CIP
CKT 53
CIP-15
19 Issue: UG295266, 3Ø, 750 MC URD conductor reaches 63% capacity.

Resolution: Open after OH240725 and close switch at Pole23857 and reconfigure SG233747 to 4=CLOSED, 3=CLOSED, 2=CLOSED and 1=OPEN to switch load to the Ivy substation. Estimated cost: $2,000 (2026).

Image 5.7-15 – CIP Project 15
5-62
370 748

CITY OF BANNING ELECTRIC UTILITY

ELECTRIC SERVICE MASTER PLAN
5-YEAR CIP
CKT 54
CIP-16
Issue: UG295263, 3Ø, 750 MCM feeder exit and 336 ACSR exceeds 60% capacity thru OH252561 (67% capacity is the highest).

Resolution:
• Disconnect line section OH2138 from OH2137 (line heading north on N. Alessandro St. north of E. Williams St.) and close switch at Pole284048 (along N. Alessandro St. between George St. and E. Wilson St.).
• Change the feed of line section OH194778 to feed from OH2138 (which will now be fed from Stagecoach CKT 8) and serve all the load along E. Williams St. west of N. Alesandro St. to feed from Stagecoach CKT8. Estimate cost: $3,400 (2029).

Image 5.7-16 – CIP Project 16
5-63
371 749

CITY OF BANNING ELECTRIC UTILITY

ELECTRIC SERVICE MASTER PLAN
5-YEAR CIP

STAGECOACH SUBSTATION
CKT 7
CIP-17
Issue: OH259474, 1Ø, #6 Cu line with 41 amps, 80 thru consumers.

Resolution: Rebuild 871’ of 1Ø, #6 CU line to 3Ø, 1/0 ACSR along E. Theadore St. from pole number P6970COB to pole number P2891COB. Estimated cost: $119,800 (2029).

Image 5.7-17 – CIP Project 17
5-64
372 750

CITY OF BANNING ELECTRIC UTILITY

ELECTRIC SERVICE MASTER PLAN
5-YEAR CIP
CIP-18
Issue: OH268700, 1Ø, #4 ACSR line with 46 amps, 105 thru consumers.

Resolution: Rebuild 1,790’ of 1Ø, #4 ACSR line to 3Ø, 1/0 ACSR along E. Nicolet St. from pole number P6956COB to pole number Pole194713. Estimated cost: $236,700 (2029).

Image 5.7-18 – CIP Project 18
5-65
373 751

CITY OF BANNING ELECTRIC UTILITY

ELECTRIC SERVICE MASTER PLAN
5-YEAR CIP
CIP-19
Issue: OH255103, 1Ø, #4 ACSR line with 41 amps, 80 thru consumers.

Resolution: Rebuild 1,417’ of 1Ø, #4 ACSR line to 3Ø, 1/0 ACSR along E. Nicolet St. from pole number P6956COB to pole number FP255128. Estimated cost: $193,400 (2029).

Image 5.7-19 – CIP Project 19
5-66
374 752

CITY OF BANNING ELECTRIC UTILITY

ELECTRIC SERVICE MASTER PLAN
5-YEAR CIP
CKT 8
CIP-20
Issue: OH280416, 1Ø, 1/0 ACSR line with 36 amps, 61 consumers.

Resolution: Rebuild 955’ of 1Ø, 1/0 ACSR and #2 ACSR line to 3Ø, 1/0 ACSR beginning on E.

Indian School Ln. then heading north to E. Repplier Rd. from pole number P1344COB to pole number 280435. Estimated cost: $134,300 (2030).

Image 5.7-20 – CIP Project 20
5-67
375 753

CITY OF BANNING ELECTRIC UTILITY

ELECTRIC SERVICE MASTER PLAN
5-YEAR CIP

SUNSET SUBSTATION
CKT 72
CIP-21
Issue: UG278161 Feeder Exit, 3Ø, 750 MCM URD conductor reaches 70% capacity.

Resolution: It is recommended to serve the Crestwood Communities load addition from CKT 77 at UG3.
• Change the feed of UG6 for the load along Mocking Bird Ln. to CKT 77 at vault SV100086. • Change the feed of UG18 for the load along Hillside Dr. to CKT 77 at vault SV100180. • Change the feed of UG33 for the load along Evergreen Ln. to CKT 77 at vault SV100084. • Change the feed of UG82 for the load along Oak Ln. to CKT 77 at junction box Pb20340.

Estimated cost: $2,800 (2026).

Image 5.7-21 – CIP Project 21
5-68
376 754

CITY OF BANNING ELECTRIC UTILITY

ELECTRIC SERVICE MASTER PLAN
5-YEAR CIP
CIP-22
Issue: UG59v, 1Ø, 1/0 URD with 56 amps, 177 thru consumers.

Resolution: Close switch at pad 23132 along Mc Govern Ave. and open at pad 253139 and switch all load south and east to serve from pad 23132 along Mc Govern Ave..

Estimated cost: $2,100 (2028).

Image 5.7-22 – CIP Project 22
5-69
377 755

CITY OF BANNING ELECTRIC UTILITY

ELECTRIC SERVICE MASTER PLAN
5-YEAR CIP
CIP-23
Issue: UG5v1, 1Ø, 4/0 URD with 55 amps, 174 thru consumers.

Resolution: Close switch at pad 23137 along W. Wilson St. and open at PAD 23138 along Bunker Hill Rd. and serve all load along Catchen Rd. from pad 23137. Estimated cost: $2,100 (2028).

Image 5.7-23 – CIP Project 23
5-70
378 756

CITY OF BANNING ELECTRIC UTILITY

ELECTRIC SERVICE MASTER PLAN
5-YEAR CIP
CIP-24
Issue: OH71, 3Ø, 4/0 ACSR conductor reaches 75% capacity and continued to be greater than 60% capacity thru OH143.

Resolution: Rebuild 1,693; of 3Ø, 4/0 ACSR line to 3Ø, 336 ACSR along W. Wilson St. from pole number 14759 to pole number 14817. Estimated cost: $219,300 (2026).

Image 5.7-24 – CIP Project 24
5-71
379 757

CITY OF BANNING ELECTRIC UTILITY

ELECTRIC SERVICE MASTER PLAN
5-YEAR CIP
CIP-25
Issue: OH183168, OH183140, and OH183149, 3Ø, #4 ACSR conductor reaches 60% capacity.

Resolution: Rebuild 437’ of 3Ø, #4 CU line to 3Ø, 336 ACSR along N. 16th St. between W.

Nicolet St. and W. Wilson St. from pole number 183146 to pole number Pole183139. Estimated cost: $66,200 (2030).

Image 5.7-23 – CIP Project 25
CKT 74
Issue: None
5-72
380 758

CITY OF BANNING ELECTRIC UTILITY

ELECTRIC SERVICE MASTER PLAN
5-YEAR CIP
CKT 76
CIP-26
Issue: UG43v, 1Ø, 1/0 URD with 39 amps, 95 thru consumers.

Resolution: Replace 650’ of 1Ø, 1/0 URD line with 3Ø, 1/0 URD line from vault 28573 along W. Wilson St. to vault 28595 at the intersection of W. Hoffer St. and Foothill Dr.

Estimated cost: $336,100 (2029).

Image 5.7-26 – CIP Project 26
CKT 77
Note: The feeder extends along Mountain Ave. along with CKT 72 but does not have any load connected. SEE CKT 72 recommendations.

BANNING SUBSTATION (34.5 kV Analysis)
CKT 1
Issue: None
CKT 2
Issue: None
5-73
381 759

CITY OF BANNING ELECTRIC UTILITY

ELECTRIC SERVICE MASTER PLAN
5-YEAR CIP
CKT 3
CIP-27
Issue: The model shows CKT 3 feeding the Midway, Ivy, and Stagecoach substations.

OH248992 Feeder Exit, 3Ø, 336 ACSR reaches 95% capacity, OH2296, 3Ø, 4/0 ACSR reaches 78% capacity, and OH2316, 3Ø, 4/0 ACSR reaches 62% capacity.

Resolution: Close the tie around Pole241891 and open the line at Pole262449 to switch load from CKT 3 to CKT 1. This will change the feed of the Stagecoach substation to be served by CKT1. Estimated cost: $2,100 (2026).

Image 5.7-27 – CIP Project 27
5-74
382 760

CITY OF BANNING ELECTRIC UTILITY

ELECTRIC SERVICE MASTER PLAN
5-YEAR CIP

5.8 – Total Cost Estimate
The table below contains a breakdown of the total estimated cost of the 5-Year CIP.

Table 5.8-1 – Total 5-Year CIP Cost Estimate
2026-2030 CIP
2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Totals
OH Maintenance Program
Total Cost $604,198 $622,324 $640,994 $1,079,272 $1,111,650 $4,058,438 CIAC $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
BEU Funding Cost $604,198 $622,324 $640,994 $1,079,272 $1,111,650 $4,058,438 Capital-Maintenance Projects
Total Cost $5,460,000 $3,154,500 $1,690,000 $4,980,000 $5,500,000 $20,784,500 CIAC $4,918,750 $1,000,000 $0 $2,375,000 $1,000,000 $9,293,750 BEU Funding Cost $541,250 $2,154,500 $1,690,000 $2,605,000 $4,500,000 $11,490,750 System Improvements Projects
Total Cost $411,000 $492,700 $230,100 $919,400 $752,500 $2,805,700 CIAC $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
BEU Funding Cost $411,000 $492,700 $230,100 $919,400 $752,500 $2,805,700 5-year CIP Cost
Total Cost $6,475,198 $4,269,524 $2,561,094 $6,978,672 $7,364,150 $27,648,638 CIAC $4,918,750 $1,000,000 $0 $2,375,000 $1,000,000 $9,293,750 BEU Funding Cost $1,156,448 $3,269,524 $2,561,094 $4,603,672 $6,364,150 $18,354,888 For the BEU funding cost, 22% is for OH Maintenance Program, 63% is for Capital Maintenance Projects, and 15% is for System-Improvement Projects.
5-75
383 761

CITY OF BANNING ELECTRIC UTILITY
2026-2045 ELECTRIC SERVICE MASTER PLAN

6.0 – 15 – YEAR ESMP

6.1 – Overhead Maintenance Program
The Overhead Maintenance Program includes the routine inspection and replacement of poles on the sub-transmission and distribution circuits on the BEU system.

It is projected that BEU will inspect 20 poles per week for the years 2031 thru 2035 and 25 poles per week for the years 2036 thru 2045. This totals to 1,040 poles inspected per year between 2031 and 2035 and 1,300 poles inspected between 2036 and 2045 for a grand total of 18,200 poles inspected for the duration of the 15-Year ESMP. An estimated cost of $322 per pole inspection was used for 2031 and a 3% inflation to this cost was assumed per year every year after thru 2045. The total estimated cost for pole inspections for the 15-Year ESMP is $7,350,010.

It is projected that BEU will replace 100 poles per year for the years 2031 thru 2045. This totals to 1,500 poles replaced for the duration of the 15-Year ESMP. An estimated cost of $8,935 per pole replacement was used for 2031 and a 3% inflation to this cost was assumed per year every year after thru 2045. The total estimated cost for pole replacements for the 15-Year ESMP is $16,618,732.

The total estimated cost for the Overhead Maintenance Program for the 15-year ESMP is $23,968,742. The table below shows a breakdown of the Overhead Maintenance Program.

Table 6.1-1 – Overhead Maintenance Program Costs 2031 thru 2035 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 Total
Number of
Poles
Inspected
1,040 1,040 1,040 1,040 1,040 5,200
Cost per
Inspection �‬‮‮ �‬‬‮ �‬⁮‮ �‬⁯‮ �‬⁪‬ -
Total Cost of
Inspection $335,290 $345,349 $355,709 $366,380 $377,372 $1,780,100 Number of
Poles
Replaced
100 100 100 100 100 500
Cost per
Replacement $8,935 $9,203 $9,479 $9,764 $10,057 -
Total Cost of
Replacement $893,532 $920,338 $947,949 $976,387 $1,005,679 $4,743,885 6-1
384 762

CITY OF BANNING ELECTRIC UTILITY
2026-2045 ELECTRIC SERVICE MASTER PLAN
Table 6.1-2 – Overhead Maintenance Program Costs 2036 thru 2040 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 Total
Number of Poles
Inspected 1,300 1,300 1,300 1,300 1,300 6,500
Cost per Inspection $374 $385 $397 $408 $421 -
Total Cost of
Inspection $485,866 $500,442 $515,455 $530,919 $546,847 $2,579,529 Number of Poles
Replaced 100 100 100 100 100 500
Cost per
Replacement $10,358 $10,669 $10,989 $11,319 $11,659 -
Total Cost of
Replacement $1,035,849 $1,066,924 $1,098,932 $1,131,900 $1,165,857 $5,499,463 Table 6.1-3 – Overhead Maintenance Program Costs 2041 thru 2045 2041 2042 2043 2044 2045 Total
Number of Poles
Inspected 1,300 1,300 1,300 1,300 1,300 6,500
Cost per Inspection $433 $446 $460 $473 $488 -
Total Cost of
Inspection $563,252 $580,150 $597,554 $615,481 $633,945 $2,990,381 Number of Poles
Replaced 100 100 100 100 100 500
Cost per
Replacement $12,008 $12,369 $12,740 $13,122 $13,515 -
Total Cost of
Replacement $1,200,833 $1,236,858 $1,273,964 $1,312,182 $1,351,547 $6,375,384 6-2
385 763

CITY OF BANNING ELECTRIC UTILITY

ELECTRIC SERVICE MASTER PLAN
15-YEAR ESMP

6.2 – CAPITAL MAINTENANCE PROJECTS
BEU has identified 6 Capital Maintenance Projects to include in the 15-year ESMP. The total estimated cost for these projects is $8,350,000. It is projected that BEU will receive $3,000,000 in contributions in aid to these projects bringing the total BEU funding cost to $5,350,000.

The following tables list the Capital Maintenance projects that have been identified for inclusion to the 15-year ESMP.

Table 6.2-1 – Capital Maintenance Project Costs
Project Description Year Total Cost CIAC
BEU
Funding
Cost
Midway Substation Upgrades (breaker
replacement and SCADA-ready
upgrades and future full replacement)
2031 $1,000,000 $0 $1,000,000

34.5/12.47/fiber Relocation on 4th St
from Westward Ave to Lincoln St 2031 $1,500,000 $1,500,0001 $0 Underground Conversion from
Apex/Ramsey to Joshua Palmer 2031 $850,000 $0 $850,000
Underground Conversion at Wilson St
from Smith Creek to Highland Home Rd 2031 $500,000 $0 $500,000

34.5/12.47/fiber I-10 Crossing at
Hathaway from John St to Ramsey St 2031 $1,500,000 $1,500,0002 $0 Overhead Transmission System
Extension (Hoffer/Hathaway to
Stagecoach Substation)
2031-
2032 $3,000,000 $0 $3,000,000
Total 15-Year ESMP Capital Maintenance Cost $8,350,000 $3,000,000 $5,300,000 1 Up to 100% funding from Rancho San Gorgonio Development 2 Up to 100% funding from Hillwood Development
6-3
386 764

CITY OF BANNING ELECTRIC UTILITY
2026-2045 ELECTRIC SERVICE MASTER PLAN
15-YEAR ESMP

6.3 – SUBSTATION CAPACITY ANALYSIS
The table below represents the substation capacity analysis based on the 2045 substation demand after distribution system improvements including adding the new Smith Creek Substation, new feeders out of Stagecoach and Sunset, and load switching recommendations.

As shown in the table, the San Gorgonio, Stagecoach, and Sunset substations summer projected peak exceeds the base rating of their respective transformer; however, with the exception of the Stagecoach Substation, the load does not exceed the max rating of the transformer. For the Stagecoach Substation, it is recommended to replace the existing base 10 MVA transformer with a base 15 MVA transformer before the summer 2040 peak. With this improvement, the projected load will not exceed the base rating or the max rating of the new transformer thru the end of this ESMP.

Table 6.3-1 – Substation Capacity Analysis
2045 kW
Demand
Transformer
Base
Transformer
Max
Transformer
High Side
Transformer
Low Side
Transformer
% Capacity
Transformer
% Capacity
Forecast MVA MVA kV kV Base Max
22nd Street
S 6,250 15 25 34.4 12.47 42% 25%
W 4,809 18 29 27% 17%
Ivy
S 11,446 15 25 69x34.4 12.47 76% 46%
W 9,679 18 29 54% 34%
Midway
S 0 2 x 7.5 2 x 9.375 34.4 12.47 0% 0%
W 0 18 22 0% 0%
Smith Creek
S 32,566 2 x 20 2 x 37.5 69x34.4 12.47 81% 43%
W 20,906 48 75 44% 28%
San
Gorgonio
S 19,996 2 x 10 2 x 14 69x34.5 12.47 100% 71%
W 18,391 24 32 77% 57%
Stagecoach
S 14,764 10 12.5 69x34.5 12.47 148% 118%
W 8,374 12 14 70% 58%
Sunset
S 20,920 15 25 69x34.5 12.47 139% 84%
W 13,441 18 29 75% 47%
SCEBanning
S 90,738 2 x 21 2 x 28 34.5 216% 162%
W 75,580 50.4 64 150% 117%
Notes:

1. Individual substation kW Demand forecast shown as the non-coincident peak.

2. SCE-Banning kW Demand forecast shown as the coincident peak.

3. Base winter rating determined by IEEE C57.91-1995, Table 4 (1% increase per °C)

4. Max winter rating determined by IEEE C57.91-1995, Table 4 (0.75% increase per °C) 6-4
387 765

CITY OF BANNING ELECTRIC UTILITY
2026-2045 ELECTRIC SERVICE MASTER PLAN
15-YEAR ESMP

6.4 – DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM ANALYSIS
Analysis was run using Milsoft’s Windmil software on the distribution system to determine system improvement projects to correct low voltage, decrease conductor and equipment loading, and reduce single phase line loading to aid in phase balancing for the 15-year ESMP. The analysis results include 5 projects to switch load to adjacent lines at a total estimated cost of $17,100, 2 projects for new overhead line construction totaling $1,219,000, 9 projects for rebuilding overhead lines totaling $1,926,600, 10 projects for new underground line construction totaling $7,107,100 and 4 projects for replacing underground line with larger conductor totaling $1,269,500. The total estimated cost for distribution system improvements for the 15-year ESMP is $11,539,300.

The following pages detail the recommended distribution system improvements by substation and circuit.
6-5
388 766

CITY OF BANNING ELECTRIC UTILITY
2026-2045 ELECTRIC SERVICE MASTER PLAN
15-YEAR ESMP
22ND STREET SUBSTATION
CKT 63
ESMP-1
Issue: UG33x303, 1Ø, #2 URD line with 41 amps, 41 thru consumers.

Resolution:
• Replace 580’ of 1Ø, #2 URD line with 3Ø, 1/0 URD line from vault 44888 to pad 44888 along Indian Wells Rd.
• Split the load between multiple phases.
• Estimated cost: $345,600 (2041).

Image 6.4-1 – ESMP Project 1
6-6
389 767

CITY OF BANNING ELECTRIC UTILITY
2026-2045 ELECTRIC SERVICE MASTER PLAN
15-YEAR ESMP
ESMP-2
Issue: UG9v7, 1Ø, 1/0 URD line with 41 amps, 86 thru consumers.

Resolution:
• Construct 540’ of 1Ø, 1/0 URD line from pad 46153 to pad 108770 along Pauma Valley Rd. utilizing pull boxes Pb101706, Pb108810, PB108831, and Pb108819 • Open after line section UG9v9 at vault 108834
• Change the feed of line section UG33x490 along Eagle Trace Ln. at vault 108834 to feed from the north.
• Change the feed of UG33x489 along Warwick Hills Way at pad 108770 to feed from the north.
• Estimated cost: $388,100 (2045).

Image 6.4-2 – ESMP Project 2
CKT 64
Issue: None

IVY SUBSTATION
CKT 11
Issue: None
6-7
390 768

CITY OF BANNING ELECTRIC UTILITY
2026-2045 ELECTRIC SERVICE MASTER PLAN
15-YEAR ESMP
CKT 12
ESMP-3
Issue: OH239297, 3Ø, #2 ACSR OH conductor reaches 73% capacity.

Resolution: Rebuild 423’ of 3Ø, 1/0 ACSR and #2 ACSR line to 3Ø, 336 ACSR along E.

Westward Ave and crossing E. Woodward Ave from Pole239250 to Pole239296.

Estimated cost: $120,400 (2044).

Image 6.4-3 – ESMP Project 3
CKT 13
Issue: None

MIDWAY SUBSTATION
The new Smith Creek Substation is planned for construction beginning in 2030 with a planned energization in 2031. All of the load currently served by the Midway Substation will be switched to Smith Creek. See the Smith Creek Substation writeup for system improvements required to support the load.
6-8
391 769

CITY OF BANNING ELECTRIC UTILITY
2026-2045 ELECTRIC SERVICE MASTER PLAN
15-YEAR ESMP

SAN GORGONIO SUBSTATION
CKT 51
ESMP-4
Issue: UG295264, 3Ø, 750 MCM conductor at the feeder exit reaches 66% capacity and OH1359, 3Ø, 336 ACSR conductor along W Lincoln St. reaches 62% capacity.

Resolution: Open SW209315-A at FP197794 Along George St. between N. 3rd St. and N 2nd St. and switch a portion of load to the Stagecoach substation. Note: In order for this to be completed without further problems, CKT’s 5 and 6 out of the Stagecoach substation will be constructed. See the Stagecoach system improvement recommendations for projects required to complete this load switch. Estimated cost: $3,100 (2041).

Image 6.4-4 – ESMP Project 4
ESMP-5
Issue: OH189322, 1Ø, #6 CU line with 59 amps, 57 thru consumers.

Resolution: Rebuild 625’ of 1Ø, #6 and #4 CU line to 3Ø, 1/0 ACSR from Pole189367 to Pole198056 between W. Nicolet St. and W. Williams St. and just west of N. 6th St.

Once the line is rebuilt to three-phase, balance the taps between the three phases.

Estimated cost: $132,800 (2040).
6-9
392 770

CITY OF BANNING ELECTRIC UTILITY
2026-2045 ELECTRIC SERVICE MASTER PLAN
15-YEAR ESMP
Image 6.4-5 – ESMP Project 5
CKT 52
Issue: None
CKT 53
ESMP-6
Issue: UG241798, 1Ø, 2 URD with 59 amps, 46 thru consumers.

Resolution: Open the single-phase line at Vault 146193 and backfeed the line at Pad 146238 to split up the single-phase line and serve from another source. Estimated cost:
$2,900 (2039).
6-10
393 771

CITY OF BANNING ELECTRIC UTILITY
2026-2045 ELECTRIC SERVICE MASTER PLAN
15-YEAR ESMP
Image 6.4-6 – ESMP Project 6
ESMP-7
Issue: OH237438, 1Ø, #4 ACSR line with 57 amps, 34 thru consumers.

Resolution: Rebuild 3,155’ of 1Ø, #4 ACSR line to 3Ø, 1/0 ACSR from FP237936 to Pole237034 beginning at the intersection of S. Hargrave St. and Wesley St. and ending at the intersection of S. Hathaway St. and Porter St. Once the line is rebuilt to three-phase, balance the taps between the three phases. Estimated cost:
$539,700 (2038).
6-11
394 772

CITY OF BANNING ELECTRIC UTILITY
2026-2045 ELECTRIC SERVICE MASTER PLAN
15-YEAR ESMP
Image 6.4-7 – ESMP Project 7
CKT 54
Issue: None

STAGECOACH SUBSTATION
CKT 5 & 6
In order to balance the load at the Stagecoach substation and also to switch load from the San Gorgonio and Sunset substations to reduce conductor loading, it is recommended to build out CKT’s 5 and 6 out of the Stagecoach substation. The projects listed below are recommended to construct CKT’s 5 and 6 along with switching load from Stagecoach CKT’s 7 and 8, San Gorgonio CKT 51, and Sunset CKT 72. The two need circuits will head south from the substation to E.

Theodore St., head west on E. Theodore St. to N. Alessandro St., head south on N. Alessandro St. to E. Hoffer St. and then head west on E. Hoffer St. and end just west of N. San Gorgonio Ave.

Circuit 5 will be express to this point.

ESMP-8
• Construct 2, 150’; 3Ø, 750 MCM feeder exits from Bay 5 and Bay 6 to pole P4301COB.

Estimated cost: $165,800 (2035).
6-12
395 773

CITY OF BANNING ELECTRIC UTILITY
2026-2045 ELECTRIC SERVICE MASTER PLAN
15-YEAR ESMP
Image 6.4-8 – ESMP Project 8
ESMP-9
• Rebuild 200’ of 1Ø, #2 ACSR line to double circuit 3Ø, 477 ACSR from pole P4301COB to pole P4302COB along the substation back entrance road. • Create open point at pole P2999COB along E. Theodore St. and switch a portion of load from CKT 7 to the new CKT 6.
• Estimated cost: $57,500 (2035).
6-13
396 774

CITY OF BANNING ELECTRIC UTILITY
2026-2045 ELECTRIC SERVICE MASTER PLAN
15-YEAR ESMP
Image 6.4-9 – ESMP Project 9
ESMP-10
• Rebuild 650’ of 3Ø, 1/0 ACSR line to double circuit 3Ø, 477 ACSR from pole P4302COB to pole GT68215 along E. Theodore St. from N. Hermosa Ave heading west to just past Vista Serna Ave. Estimated cost: $157,400 (2035).
6-14
397 775

CITY OF BANNING ELECTRIC UTILITY
2026-2045 ELECTRIC SERVICE MASTER PLAN
15-YEAR ESMP
Image 6.4-10 – ESMP Project 10
ESMP-11
• Rebuild 900’ of 1Ø, #2 CU line to double circuit 3Ø, 477 ACSR from pole GT68215 to pole P2330COB along E. Theadore St. east of N. Alessandro St. Estimated cost: $181,800 (2035).
6-15
398 776

CITY OF BANNING ELECTRIC UTILITY
2026-2045 ELECTRIC SERVICE MASTER PLAN
15-YEAR ESMP
Image 6.4-11 – ESMP Project 11
ESMP-12
• Construct 100’ of double circuit 3Ø, 477 ACSR line from pole P2330COB to pole P2331COB along E. Theadore St. east of N. Alessandro St. • Create open point at Pole282646 along N. Alessandro St. just north of E. Theodore St. and switch a portion of load from CKT 8 to CKT 6.
• Estimated cost: $31,800 (2035).
6-16
399 777

CITY OF BANNING ELECTRIC UTILITY
2026-2045 ELECTRIC SERVICE MASTER PLAN
15-YEAR ESMP
Image 6.4-12 – ESMP Project 12
ESMP-13
• Rebuild 2,150’ of 3Ø, 336 ACSR line to double circuit 3Ø, 336 ACSR from pole P2331COB to Pole283017 heading south along N. Alessandro St and then west along W. Hoffer St. • At Pole283017, switch the tap heading north towards W. Gillman St. to CKT 5 and switch the tap heading south towards E. Wilson St. to CKT 6.
• Estimated cost: $455,400 (2035).
6-17
400 778

CITY OF BANNING ELECTRIC UTILITY
2026-2045 ELECTRIC SERVICE MASTER PLAN
15-YEAR ESMP
Image 6.4-13 – ESMP Project 13
CKT 7
Issue: None
CKT 8
ESMP-14
Issue: OH282953, 1Ø, #4 CU line with 37 amps, 52 consumers.

Resolution: Rebuild 510’ of 1Ø, #4 CU line to 3Ø, 1/0 ACSR along E. Theodore St. west of N.

Alessandro St from pole P2331COB to pole 30733CWT. Estimated cost: $115,200 (2043).
6-18
401 779

CITY OF BANNING ELECTRIC UTILITY
2026-2045 ELECTRIC SERVICE MASTER PLAN
15-YEAR ESMP
Image 6.4-14 – ESMP Project 14

SUNSET SUBSTATION
CKT 72
ESMP-15
Issue: UG278161 Feeder Exit, 3Ø, 750 MCM URD conductor reaches 95% capacity and is greater than 80% capacity thru UG20. OH71 3Ø, 336 ACSR reaches 76% capacity and is greater than 60% capacity thru OH165. OH162 3Ø, 4/0 ACSR reaches 80% capacity and is greater than 60% capacity thru OH156.

Resolution: It is recommended to open at Pole175357 at the intersection of N. 22nd St. and W.

Nicolet St. and close at Pole200537 along W. Gilman St. just west of N. 8th St. and switch load to the new Stagecoach CKT 5. Estimated cost: $2,800 (2036). 6-19
402 780

CITY OF BANNING ELECTRIC UTILITY
2026-2045 ELECTRIC SERVICE MASTER PLAN
15-YEAR ESMP
Image 6.4-15 – ESMP Project 15
ESMP-16
Issue: With the load switch from Stagecoach CKT 72 to Stagecoach CKT 5 as described in ESMP-15, the 3Ø, #2 ACSR line at OH200538 reaches 101% Resolution: Rebuild 875’ of 3Ø, #2 ACSR line to 3Ø, 477 ACSR from Pole200537 to Pole213210 along W. Gilman St. between N. 8th St and 11th St. Estimated cost:
$166,400 (2037).
6-20
403 781

CITY OF BANNING ELECTRIC UTILITY
2026-2045 ELECTRIC SERVICE MASTER PLAN
15-YEAR ESMP
Image 6.4-16 – ESMP Project 16
ESMP-17
Issue: OH213258, 1Ø, #2 ACSR line with 41 amps, 73 consumers Resolution: It is recommended to open at Pad 28196 and close at Pad 28229 and split the load between W. Gilman St. and W Hoffer St. west of N. 8th St. from two different threephase lines. Estimated cost: $3,400 (2042). 6-21
404 782

CITY OF BANNING ELECTRIC UTILITY
2026-2045 ELECTRIC SERVICE MASTER PLAN
15-YEAR ESMP
Image 6.4-17 – ESMP Project 17
CKT 74
Issue: None
6-22
405 783

CITY OF BANNING ELECTRIC UTILITY
2026-2045 ELECTRIC SERVICE MASTER PLAN
15-YEAR ESMP
CKT 76
ESMP-18
Issue: Underground feeder exit, 3Ø, 750 MCM reaches 110% capacity and is greater than 60% capacity through UG2vQ6 at Vault 31064.

Resolution:
• Utilize CKT 78 and create a new feeder to serve the south west side of the Atwell Subdivision. See Image 6.4-20 below for the feeder plan recommendation. • Using the existing empty conduit that is in the same trench as CKT 76:
o Install 1,862’ of 3Ø, 750 MCM from the feeder bay exit to Vault LV100172 at the intersection of Highland Home Rd. and Mountain Ave. using the existing conduit. o Install 2,706‘ of 3Ø, 750 MCM from Vault LV100172 to Vault SP100103 along Highland Home Rd. north of Meadowline Way using the existing conduit and connect to cabinet #2 in switchgear SW12-2116 while removing the connection between Vault SP100102 cabinet #1 and Vault SP100103 cabinet #2. This will switch all load along Meadowline Way west of Highland Home Rd. to CKT 78. o Install 1,400’ of 3Ø, 750 MCM from Vault SP100109 cabinet 1 to Switchgear SG290766 following Meadowline Way.
o Open at Vault M98523 along N. Highland Springs Ave. and close SG290766 cabinet #2 along Meadowline Way and switch all load currently served from CKT 76 to the new CKT 78.
o Estimated cost: $927,000 (2031).

Image 6.4-18 – ESMP Project 18
6-23
406 784

CITY OF BANNING ELECTRIC UTILITY
2026-2045 ELECTRIC SERVICE MASTER PLAN
15-YEAR ESMP
EMSP-19
Issue: Despite the load switch to the new CKT 78, the underground feeder exit, 3Ø, 750 MCM is still over 60% capacity through Vault SP100105
Resolution:
• Utilize CKT 75 and create a new feeder to serve the south side of the Atwell Subdivision.

See Image 6.4-20 below for the feeder plan recommendation. • Using the existing empty conduit that is in the same trench as CKT 76:
o Install 1,862’ of 3Ø, 750 MCM from the feeder bay exit to Vault LV100172 at the intersection of Highland Home Rd. and Mountain Ave. using the existing conduit. o Install 2,706‘ of 3Ø, 750 MCM from Vault LV100172 to Vault SP100103 along Highland Home Rd. north of Meadowline Way using the existing conduit. o Install 2,953’ of 3Ø, 750 MCM from Vault SP100103 to Vault 30985 along W.

Wilson St. west of Highland Home Rd.
o At Vault 30985, switch the conductor heading west along W. Wilson St. to feed from the new CKT 75.
o Estimated cost: $1,032,400 (2032).

Image 6.4-19 – ESMP Project 19
6-24
407 785

CITY OF BANNING ELECTRIC UTILITY
2026-2045 ELECTRIC SERVICE MASTER PLAN
15-YEAR ESMP
Image 6.4-20 – FEEDER PLAN FOR CKT’S 75, 76, AND 78
CKT 77
Issue: None

NEW SMITH CREEK SUBSTATION
The new Smith Creek substation is planned to be constructed at a property owned by the City of Banning on the south side of Interstate 10 and will replace the Midway substation on the north side of Interstate 10. Construction for the new Smith Creek substation will begin in 2030 with an energization date in 2031. All four feeders currently served by Midway will be switched to Smith Creek. Additionally, four new feeders will be added at Smith Creek to served planned load additions between Interstate 10 and Westward Ave. The projects below are recommended to construct the new feeders out of Smith Creek to serve the existing Midway feeders and support existing and future load additions. Refer to Image 6.4-32 for the Smith Creek feeder plan.

Smith Creek CKT 21
Circuit 21 will be constructed to serve the existing Midway CKT 21. 6-25
408 786

CITY OF BANNING ELECTRIC UTILITY
2026-2045 ELECTRIC SERVICE MASTER PLAN
15-YEAR ESMP
ESMP-20
• Construct 300’ of 3Ø, 750 MCM URD from the feeder bay to Pole104936. • Create open point at Pole104876 and serve the load on the south side of Interstate 10. • Create an open point at Pole104926 along Highland Home Rd. between CKT 21 and 25 • Create an open point at pole P6554COB along Westward Ave. between CKT 21 and 25 • Create an open point at Vault 40257 along Fairway Oks Ave. just north of Mission Hills Dr. between CKT 21 and 25
• Tie the three-phase line together at Vault 38231 at the intersection of Birdie Dr. and Cog Hill Rd.
• Estimated cost: $144,400 (2031).

Image 6.4-21 – ESMP Project 20
Smith Creek CKT 22
Circuit 22 will be constructed to serve the existing Midway CKT 22 and CKT 23.

ESMP-21
• Construct 300’ of 3Ø, 750 MCM URD from the feeder bay to Pole104876 and use the existing Midway CKT 21 Interstate 10 crossing to serve the existing Midway CKT 22.

Estimated cost: $139,600 (2031).
6-26
409 787

CITY OF BANNING ELECTRIC UTILITY
2026-2045 ELECTRIC SERVICE MASTER PLAN
15-YEAR ESMP
Image 6.4-22 – ESMP Project 21
Smith Creek CKT 23
Circuit 23 will be constructed to serve the existing Midway CKT 23.

ESMP-22
• Construct 300’ of 3Ø, 750 MCM URD from the feeder bay to Pole104936 • Chage the feed at Pole104936 from Midway CKT 23 to Smith Creek CKT 23 • Use the existing Midway CKT 24 Interstate 10 crossing as the new Smith Creek CKT 23 highway crossing.
• Tie Midway CKT 23 to Smith Creek CKT 23 inside the current Midway substation to switch all of Midway CKT 23 to Smith Creek CKT 23
• Estimated cost: $144,400 (2031).
6-27
410 788

CITY OF BANNING ELECTRIC UTILITY
2026-2045 ELECTRIC SERVICE MASTER PLAN
15-YEAR ESMP
Image 6.4-23 – ESMP Project 22
ESMP-23
Issue: The 750 MCM conductor at the feeder exit will reach 79% capacity, the 336 ACSR and 477 ACSR line up to and crossing Interstate 10 will reach 80% capacity and 64% capacity respectively, and the 750 MCM conductor at the current Midway CKT 23 feeder exit and heading along W. Ramsey St. to Lori Way exceeds 60% capacity.

Resolution:
• Construct 800’ of 3Ø, 750 MCM URD line from Vault 320963 to Vault 34038 and up to riser Pole34020 along W. Ramsey St between Highland Home Rd. and Lori Way. • Rebuild 2,165’ of single circuit 3Ø, 336 ACSR to double circuit 3Ø, 336 ACSR from Pole34020 to Pole206642 along W. Ramsey St. between Lori Way and Memorial Dr. • Rebuild 175’ of single circuit 3Ø, 750 MCM URD line to double circuit 3Ø, 750 MCM from riser Pole206642 to Vault 204676 along W. Ramsey St. at Memorial Dr. • At Vault 204676, leave the tap heading west along W. Ramey St. connected to CKT 23 and change the feed of the tap heading north along Memorial Dr. to CKT 22 using the newly constructed line.
• In SG266801 at the intersection of W. Ramsey St. and N. Highland Springs Ave., open cabinet #3
• Connect the three-phase between Vault 204734 and Vault 204656 to change the feed to Smith Creek CKT 22.
• Estimated cost: $1,187,200 (2036).
6-28
411 789

CITY OF BANNING ELECTRIC UTILITY
2026-2045 ELECTRIC SERVICE MASTER PLAN
15-YEAR ESMP
Image 6.4-24 – ESMP Project 23
Smith Creek CKT 24
Circuit 24 will be constructed to serve the existing Midway CKT 24.

ESMP-24
• Construct 300’ of 3Ø, 750 MCM URD from the feeder bay to Pole104900 and switch Midway CKT 24 to Smith Creek CKT 24. Estimated cost: $139,600 (2031). 6-29
412 790

CITY OF BANNING ELECTRIC UTILITY
2026-2045 ELECTRIC SERVICE MASTER PLAN
15-YEAR ESMP
Image 6.4-25 – ESMP Project 24
ESMP-25
Issue: UG1v, 3Ø, 1/0 URD line reaches 81% Capacity
Resolution: Replace 440’ of 3Ø, 1/0 URD with 3Ø, 750 MCM from Junction Box 34967 to Vault 34921 at the intersection of Northwood Ave. and Brooklawn Dr. Estimated cost:
$237,600 (2034).
6-30
413 791

CITY OF BANNING ELECTRIC UTILITY
2026-2045 ELECTRIC SERVICE MASTER PLAN
15-YEAR ESMP
Image 6.4-26 – ESMP Project 25
Smith Creek CKT 25
Circuit 25 will be constructed to serve a portion of the existing Midway CKT 21.

ESMP-26
• Construct 2,745’ of double circuit 3Ø, 750 MCM URD line from the feeder bay to pole P6554COB at the intersection of Westward Ave. and S. Highland Home Rd. *Note, this will also be the route for Smith Creek CKT 26.
• At pole P6554COB, change feed from Midway CKT 21 to Smith Creek CKT 25. • Estimated cost: $1,652,900 (2031).
6-31
414 792

CITY OF BANNING ELECTRIC UTILITY
2026-2045 ELECTRIC SERVICE MASTER PLAN
15-YEAR ESMP
Image 6.4-27 – ESMP Project 26
ESMP-27
Issue: UG1v24, 3Ø, 350 MCM URD conductor reaches 79% capacity.

Resolution: Replace 2,100’ of 3Ø, 350 AL MCM URD conductor with 3Ø, 750 MCM URD conductor from Vault 36923 located at the intersection of Sun Lakes Blvd. and Country Club Dr. and following Country Club Dr. to Vault 41797 at the intersection of Country Club Dr. and Hogan Ave. Estimated cost: $316,000 (2031). 6-32
415 793

CITY OF BANNING ELECTRIC UTILITY
2026-2045 ELECTRIC SERVICE MASTER PLAN
15-YEAR ESMP
Image 6.4-28 – ESMP Project 27
Smith Creek CKT 26
Circuit 26 will be constructed to serve a portion of the existing Midway CKT 21 and 22nd Street CKT 63. See ESMP-26 for project to construct the circuit from Smith Creek.

ESMP-28
• Create open point at Pole104842 along Westward Ave to switch a portion of load from 22nd Street CKT 63
• At SG49762 along Country Club Dr. between Birdie Dr. and Gleneagles Dr., open cabinet #2 and change feed to Smith Creek CKT 25 at Vault 41797 along County Club Dr. at Hogan Ave.
• Estimated cost: $4,900 (2031).
6-33
416 794

CITY OF BANNING ELECTRIC UTILITY
2026-2045 ELECTRIC SERVICE MASTER PLAN
15-YEAR ESMP
Image 6.4-29 – ESMP Project 28
ESMP-29
Issue: UG16v2, 3Ø, 350 MCM URD conductor reaches 70% capacity.

Resolution: Replace 2,420’ of 3Ø, 350 MCM URD with 3Ø, 750 MCM URD beginning at Pad 44570 along Sun Lakes Blvd, heading south on Country Club Dr. and ending at Vault 46131. Estimated cost: $370,300 (2033).
6-34
417 795

CITY OF BANNING ELECTRIC UTILITY
2026-2045 ELECTRIC SERVICE MASTER PLAN
15-YEAR ESMP
Image 6.4-30 – ESMP Project 29
Smith Creek CKT’s 27 & 28
Circuits 27 and 28 will be constructed to serve new planned load in an area bordered by Interstate 10 and Westward Ave. on the north and south and Highland Home Rd. and Sunset Ave. on the east and west.

ESMP-30
• Construct 2, 3Ø, 750 MCM URD lines from the feeder bay heading due south from the substation to what will be the extension of W Lincoln St. and then heading east along W.

Lincoln St. to Sunset Ave at Pole104911. Estimated cost: $2,372,900 (2032). 6-35
418 796

CITY OF BANNING ELECTRIC UTILITY
2026-2045 ELECTRIC SERVICE MASTER PLAN
15-YEAR ESMP
Image 6.4-31 – ESMP Project 30
Image 6.4-32 – Smith Creek Feeder Plan
6-36
419 797

CITY OF BANNING ELECTRIC UTILITY
2026-2045 ELECTRIC SERVICE MASTER PLAN
15-YEAR ESMP

6.5 – TOTAL COST ESTIMATE
The tables below contain a breakdown of the total estimated cost of the 15-Year ESMP.

Table 6.5-1 – 15-Year ESMP Cost Estimate (2031-2035)
2031 2032 2033 2034 2035
OH Maintenance Program
Total Cost $1,228,822 $1,265,687 $1,303,658 $1,342,767 $1,383,050 CIAC $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
BEU Funding Cost $1,228,822 $1,265,687 $1,303,658 $1,342,767 $1,383,050 Capital-Maintenance Projects
Total Cost $6,850,000 $1,500,000 $0 $0 $0
CIAC $3,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
BEU Funding Cost $3,850,000 $1,500,000 $0 $0 $0
System Improvement Projects
Total Cost $3,468,800 $3,405,300 $370,300 $237,600 $1,049,700 CIAC $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
BEU Funding Cost $3,468,800 $3,405,300 $370,300 $237,600 $1,049,700 15-year ESMP Cost
Total Cost $11,547,622 $6,170,987 $1,673,958 $1,580,367 $2,432,750 CIAC $3,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
BEU Funding Cost $8,547,622 $6,170,987 $1,673,958 $1,580,367 $2,432,750 6-37
420 798

CITY OF BANNING ELECTRIC UTILITY
2026-2045 ELECTRIC SERVICE MASTER PLAN
15-YEAR ESMP
Table 6.5-2 – 15-Year ESMP Cost Estimate (2036-2040)
2036 2037 2038 2039 2040
OH Maintenance Program
Total Cost $1,521,715 $1,567,367 $1,614,387 $1,662,819 $1,712,704 CIAC $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
BEU Funding Cost $1,521,715 $1,567,367 $1,614,387 $1,662,819 $1,712,704 Capital-Maintenance Projects
Total Cost $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
CIAC $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
BEU Funding Cost $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
System Improvement Projects
Total Cost $1,190,000 $166,400 $539,700 $2,900 $132,800 CIAC $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
BEU Funding
Cost $1,190,000 $166,400 $539,700 $2,900 $132,800
15-year ESMP Cost
Total Cost $2,711,715 $1,733,767 $2,154,087 $1,665,719 $1,845,504 CIAC $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
BEU Funding Cost $2,711,715 $1,733,767 $2,154,087 $1,665,719 $1,845,504 6-38
421 799

CITY OF BANNING ELECTRIC UTILITY
2026-2045 ELECTRIC SERVICE MASTER PLAN
15-YEAR ESMP
Table 6.5-3 – 15-Year ESMP Cost Estimate (2041-2045)
2041 2042 2043 2044 2045 Totals
OH Maintenance Program
Total Cost $1,764,085 $1,817,007 $1,871,518 $1,927,663 $1,985,493 $23,968,742 CIAC $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
BEU Funding Cost $1,764,085 $1,817,007 $1,871,518 $1,927,663 $1,985,493 $23,968,742 Capital-Maintenance Projects
Total Cost $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $8,350,000
CIAC $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,000,000
BEU Funding Cost $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,350,000
System Improvement Projects
Total Cost $348,700 $3,400 $115,200 $120,400 $388,100 $11,539,300 CIAC $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
BEU Funding Cost $348,700 $3,400 $115,200 $120,400 $388,100 $11,539,300 15-year ESMP Cost
Total Cost $2,112,785 $1,820,407 $1,986,718 $2,048,063 $2,373,593 $43,858,042 CIAC $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,000,000
BEU Funding Cost $2,112,785 $1,820,407 $1,986,718 $2,048,063 $2,373,593 $40,858,042 For the BEU funding cost, 22% is for OH Maintenance Program, 63% is for Capital Maintenance Projects, and 15% is for System-Improvement Projects.
6-39
422 800

CITY OF BANNING ELECTRIC UTILITY
2026-2045 ELECTRIC SERVICE MASTER PLAN

7.0 – 2026-2045 ESMP SUMMARY

7.1 – Total Overhead Maintenance Program
The Overhead Maintenance Program includes the routine inspection and replacement of poles on the sub-transmission and distribution circuits on the BEU system.

It is projected that BEU will inspect a total of 22,100 poles for the duration of the ESMP. An estimated cost of $278 per pole inspection was used for 2026 and a 3% inflation to this cost was assumed per year every year after thru 2045. The total estimated cost for pole inspections for the ESMP is $8,501,657.

It is projected that BEU will replace 1,850 for the duration of the ESMP. An estimated cost of $7,746 per pole replacement was used for 2026 and a 3% inflation to this cost was assumed per year every year after thru 2045. The total estimated cost for pole replacements for the ESMP is $19,525,523.

The total estimated cost for the Overhead Maintenance Program for the ESMP is $28,027,180.

7.2 – Total Capital Maintenance Program
BEU has identified 23 Capital Maintenance Projects to include in the ESMP. The total estimated cost for these projects is $29,134,500. It is projected that BEU will receive $12,293,750 in contributions in aid to these projects bringing the total BEU funding cost to $16,840,750.

7.3 – Total Distribution System Improvement Projects
Analysis was run using Milsoft’s Windmil software on the distribution system to determine system improvement projects to correct low voltage, decrease conductor and equipment loading, and reduce single phase line loading to aid in phase balancing. The analysis results include:
• 19 projects to switch load to adjacent lines at a total estimated cost $58,800 • 12 projects for new underground line construction totaling $7,443,500 • 2 projects for new overhead line construction totaling $1,219,000, • 9 projects for single-phase to three-phase line rebuild totaling $2,142,100 • 11 projects for overhead line rebuild using larger conductor totaling $2,212,100 • 4 projects for replacing underground line using larger conductor totaling $1,269,500 The total estimated cost for distribution system improvements is $14,345,000. 7-1
423 801

CITY OF BANNING ELECTRIC UTILITY
2026-2045 ELECTRIC SERVICE MASTER PLAN

7.4 – Total 2026-2045 ESMP Cost Estimate
The table below contains a breakdown of the total estimate cost for the 2026-2045 ESMP. 2026-2045 Electric Service Master Plan
5-year CIP 15- Year ESMP Totals
OH Maintenance Program
Total Cost $4,058,438 $23,968,742 $28,027,180
CIAC $0 $0 $0
BEU Funding Cost $4,058,438 $23,968,742 $28,027,180
Capital Maintenance. Projects
Total Cost $20,784,500 $8,350,000 $29,134,500
CIAC $9,293,750 $3,000,000 $12,293,750
BEU Funding Cost $11,490,750 $5,350,000 $16,840,750
System Improvement Projects
Total Cost $2,805,700 $11,539,300 $14,345,000
CIAC $0 $0 $0
BEU Funding Cost $2,805,700 $11,539,300 $14,345,000
Total ESMP Cost
Total Cost $27,648,638 $43,858,042 $71,506,680
CIAC $9,293,750 $3,000,000 $12,293,750
BEU Funding Cost $18,354,888 $40,858,042 $59,212,930
7-2
424 802

Banning City CouncilMay 12, 2026

Banning City Council
May 12, 2026