Banning City Council
May 26, 2026

City of Banning
Warrant Detail List March 2026
Type Number Date Vendor Name Description
Sum of
Transaction
Amount
Check 199045 Total 691.17
199046 3/19/2026 NOBEL SYSTEMS, INC BLUETTH INTGRTN GEOVIEWER 1,500.00 199046 Total 1,500.00
199047 3/19/2026 NYDIA AND ALEX ALANIZ COMPENSATION P.V SOLAR ELECTRICITY FINAL TRUE-UP 137.05 199047 Total 137.05
199048 3/19/2026 N2W ENGINEERING, INC PROJ MGMT FEB26 33,054.82 PROJ MGMT JAN26 23,425.19
199048 Total 56,480.01
199049 3/19/2026 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS BATTERY/CORE/FEE #833 207.79 BATTERY/CORE/FEE #842 207.79
DISC PAD SET/BRAKE RO #44 333.53
OIL FILTER/AIR FLTR #609 55.12
STRNG DAMPER #359 77.88
TPMS SENSOR #33 91.42
199049 Total 973.53
199050 3/19/2026 ORANGE COUNTY WINWATER WORKS WATER INVENTORY PO NUM 033918 3,186.18 WATER INVENTORY PO NUM 033921 4,660.14
199050 Total 7,846.32
199051 3/19/2026 OROZCO, RICHARD CALPERS PAYROLL MILEAGE 1/28 OROZCO 49.56 199051 Total 49.56
199052 3/19/2026 PACIFIC HYDROTECH CORP WELL M12A EQUIP/IMPR 2/26 183,500.00 199052 Total 183,500.00
199053 3/19/2026 PARKHOUSE TIRE, INC. MAINT/RECYCLING FEE #839 1,335.34 199053 Total 1,335.34
199054 3/19/2026 PARS PAYROLL SUMMARY 324.73
199054 Total 324.73
199055 3/19/2026 PAYPRO ADMINISTRATORS COBRA ADMIN FEB2026 171.00 199055 Total 171.00
199056 3/19/2026 PINNACLE PETROLEUM INC DIESEL FUEL 2,510.40 UNLEADED CARB ETH 27,684.01
199056 Total 30,194.41
199057 3/19/2026 PRATT, FRANCIS & JUDITH COMPENSATION P.V SOLAR 212.66 199057 Total 212.66
199058 3/19/2026 PUBLIC AGENCY RETIREMENT SERVICES PARS PLN ID#PH-ARS05A SVC PERIOD 1/31/2026 300.00 199058 Total 300.00
199059 3/19/2026 PUBLIC ENTITY RISK MANAGEMENT LIABILITY ASSESSMENT PAYMENT 5 OF 5 56,047.00 199059 Total 56,047.00
199060 3/19/2026 QUADIENT POSTAGE FUNDING POSTAGE DUES 2,000.00 199060 Total 2,000.00
199061 3/19/2026 RACEWAY FORD INC FUEL HOUSING/DOOR #1006 189.32 199061 Total 189.32
199062 3/19/2026 RAYGOZA, FRANK DUI TRAINING MEALS 3/30-4/1 RAYGOZA 70.00 199062 Total 70.00
199063 3/19/2026 RICHARD YEN & ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS ARMORY 11/14/25-1/31/26 PO33855 27,285.72 199063 Total 27,285.72
199064 3/19/2026 RINCON CONSULTANTS, INC. COB APR SVCS JAN/FEB26 567.25 199064 Total 567.25
199065 3/19/2026 RITA MOROVICH COMPENSATION P.V SOLAR ELECTRICITY 249.50 199065 Total 249.50
199066 3/19/2026 RIVERSIDE COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH LABO INCIDENT 2601150027 50.00 199066 Total 50.00
199067 3/19/2026 ROBERT FRY COMPENSATION P.V SOLAR ELECTRICITY FINAL TRUE-UP 489.65 199067 Total 489.65
199068 3/19/2026 RWC GROUP BUSHING LEAF/FRIGHT #243 271.85 HORN BUTTON PAD 80.73
199068 Total 352.58
199069 3/19/2026 SCA OF CA, LLC ST/PARK LOT SWEEP FEB26 11,586.06 199069 Total 11,586.06
199070 3/19/2026 SCPPA BUREAU OF RECLAMATION INV# 90160972 143.52 SCPPA TRAINING INV# 08-2026 237.85
SYNERGY COB RESDI#01-2026 19,069.09
199070 Total 19,450.46
199071 3/19/2026 SGP DESIGN AND PRINT COBNG ELECTRIC CIR DECALS 210.11 199071 Total 210.11
199072 3/19/2026 SHRED-IT USA, LLC SHREDDING SVC-PD 177.41 199072 Total 177.41
199073 3/19/2026 SIPE, BRIAN DUI TRAINING MEALS 3/30-4/1 SIPE 70.00 199073 Total 70.00
199074 3/19/2026 SLOVAK BARON EMPEY MURPHY & PINKNEY PROF SVCS FEB2026 77,993.93 199074 Total 77,993.93
199075 3/19/2026 SMART & FINAL SUPPLIES-RECREATION 110.03 199075 Total 110.03
199076 3/19/2026 SO CAL JOINT POLE COMMITTEE OPERATING EXPENSES FEB2026 1,327.63 199076 Total 1,327.63
199077 3/19/2026 SOFTWARE ONE, INC BACKUP SIMPLE STANDARD 1,910.00 199077 Total 1,910.00
199078 3/19/2026 SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY AQMD FLAT FEE FOR FY EMISSIONS 170.94 ICE (500HP) EM ELEC GEN DISEL 565.63
199078 Total 736.57
199079 3/19/2026 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON HIGHLAND HOME RD/SO WESTWARD 2/1/26-2/28/26 96.03

City of Banning
Warrant Detail List March 2026
Type Number Date Vendor Name Description
Sum of
Transaction
Amount
Check 199079 Total 96.03
199080 3/19/2026 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS CO NATURAL GAS VEHICLE FUEL 2/1/26-3/1/26 15,453.59 199080 Total 15,453.59
199081 3/19/2026 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAGE ROLL THERMAL 2-1/4 226.11 199081 Total 226.11
199082 3/19/2026 STATE OF CALIFORNIA DOJ BLOOD ALCOHOL ANALYSIS 315.00 FINGERPRINT APPS 413.00
FINGERPRINTS 147.00
199082 Total 875.00
199083 3/19/2026 STC TRAFFIC INC TRAFFIC SIG UPGRADE 4,440.00 199083 Total 4,440.00
199084 3/19/2026 TEC EQUIPMENT, INC CRANKCASE VENTILTION #805 37.11 KIT/WATER PUMP #244 285.40
PULLEY, FAN #244 94.63
SENSOR KNOCK #243 76.29
199084 Total 493.43
199085 3/19/2026 TELEPACIFIC COMMUNICATIONS CENTRAL SERVICE PHONE SVC 1,669.64 199085 Total 1,669.64
199086 3/19/2026 TOP-LINE INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY, LCC TECHNICAL SPLS/AUTO PART 38.23 199086 Total 38.23
199087 3/19/2026 VALSOFT CORPORATION INC. DIGITIZED SIGNATURE UPDATE JAN 2026 625.00 199087 Total 625.00
199088 3/19/2026 VCS ENVIRONMENTAL PROF SVCS FEB26 10,375.00 199088 Total 10,375.00
199089 3/19/2026 VEOLIA WATER CONTRACT OPERATIONS US COB O&M MAR26 78,662.50 199089 Total 78,662.50
199090 3/19/2026 VERIZON WIRELESS SERVICES, LLC ANIMAL CONTROL CELL PHONE 2/2/26-3/1/26 38.37 BUILDING & SAFETY CELLS 2/2/26-3/1/26 94.73
BUILDING MAINT CELL PHONE 2/2/26-3/1/26 76.74
CITY CLERK CELL PHONE 2/2/26-3/1/26 61.73
CITY COUNCIL CELL PHONE 2/2/26-3/1/26 190.51
CITY MANAGER CELL PHONE 2/2/26-3/1/26 163.48
CODE ENFORCE CELL PHONE 2/2/26-3/1/26 76.74
DIAL-A-RIDE CELL PHONE 2/2/26-3/1/26 181.06
DISPATCH CELLS 2/2/26-3/1/26 26.12
ECONOMIC DEV CELL PHONE 2/2/26-3/1/26 42.97
ELECTRIC CELL PHONE 2/2/26-3/1/26 1,577.98
ENGINEERING CELL PHONE 2/2/26-3/1/26 195.13
FINANCE CELL PHONE 2/2/26-3/1/26 153.48
FIRE DEPT CELL PHONE 2/2/26-3/1/26 40.01
FLEET CELL PHONE 2/2/26-3/1/26 76.74
GOV ACCESS CELL PHONE 2/2/26-3/1/26 26.12
HR CELL PHONE 2/2/26-3/1/26 193.49
INFO SERVICES CELL PHONE 2/2/26-3/1/26 153.48
METER SERVICES CELL PHONE 2/2/26-3/1/26 189.30
OEP GRANT CELL PHONE 2/2/26-3/1/26 38.37
OPPORTUNITY VILLAGE 2/2/26-3/1/26 153.48
PARKS CELL PHONE 2/2/26-3/1/26 107.18
PLANNING CELL PHONE 2/2/26-3/1/26 144.16
POLICE DEPT CELLS 2/2/26-3/1/26 1,381.32
PURCHASING CELL PHONE 2/2/26-3/1/26 72.96
RECREATION CELLS 2/2/26-3/1/26 249.88
REFUSE CELL PHONE 2/2/26-3/1/26 38.37
SENIOR CENTER CELL PHONE 2/2/26-3/1/26 38.37
STREETS DEPT CELLS 2/2/26-3/1/26 328.65
TRANSIT CELL PHONE 2/2/26-3/1/26 829.77
UTILITY BILLING CELL 2/2/26-3/1/26 38.37
WASTEWATER CELL PHONE 2/2/26-3/1/26 115.11
WATER CELL PHONE 2/2/26-3/1/26 940.99
199090 Total 8,035.16
199091 3/19/2026 VESTIS SERVICES LLC UNIFORM-FSR/FIRST AID 224.30 199091 Total 224.30
199092 3/19/2026 VIRTUAL PROJECT MANAGER, LLC SYSTEM MGMT MAR26 1,000.00 199092 Total 1,000.00
199093 3/19/2026 WALTER STANLEY COS, LLC PLEATED MATERIAL 334.84 199093 Total 334.84
199094 3/19/2026 WASTE MANAGEMENT 0F THE IE 40 YD SPECIAL WASTE 2,806.62 CONTAINER FEB 2026 680.12
ENERGY SURCHARGE 446.54
199094 Total 3,933.28
199095 3/19/2026 WATERLINE TECHNOLOGIES, INC CREDIT/CASE DEPOSIT IN (470.00) HYPOCHLORITE SOLUTION 770.95
199095 Total 300.95
199096 3/19/2026 WEAVER GRADING INC CANYON STRMWTR PERCOLTN 17,620.00 199096 Total 17,620.00
199097 3/19/2026 WESTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT 2025 GROUNDWATER-14 CITY WELLS $50 EACH 700.00 199097 Total 700.00
199098 3/19/2026 WESTERN WATER WORKS SUPPLY CO WATER INVENTORY PO NUM 033867 782.28 WATER INVENTORY PO NUM 033917 6,131.54
199098 Total 6,913.82

City of Banning
Warrant Detail List March 2026
Type Number Date Vendor Name Description
Sum of
Transaction
Amount
Check 199099 3/19/2026 WITTMAN ENTERPRISES, LLC BILLING SVCS PERFORMED 2,016.00 199099 Total 2,016.00
199100 3/19/2026 YUNEX, LLC TRAF SIG MAINT FEB26 664.24 TRAFFC SIG CALL OUT FEB26 1,196.45
199100 Total 1,860.69
Check Total 1,686,925.49
Wire 1190 3/2/2026 U.S. BANK PRINCIPAL DUE PAYMENT 10,000.00 1190 Total 10,000.00
1191 3/2/2026 RIVERSIDE PUBLIC UTILITIES AUDIT PAID DURING FEBRUARY 2026 (56,411.90) CAPACITY EXPENSE PAID DURING FEBRUARY 2026 817,585.10
CRR REVENUE PAID DURING FEBRUARY 2026 (10,373.78)
ENERGY EXPENSE PAID DURING FEBRUARY 2026 150,947.71
ENERGY REVENUE PAID DURING FEBRUARY 2026 (2,925.81)
INTEREST REVENUE PAID DURING FEBRUARY 2026 (3,396.21)
S&D EXPENSE PAID DURING FEBRUARY 2026 54,224.00
TRANS EXPENSE PAID DURING FEBRUARY 2026 486,364.74
1191 Total 1,436,013.85
Wire Total 1,446,013.85
Grand Total 6,019,818.95

Issue Date
(Original)
Check
(Original) Vendor # Reason Void Amount
Issue Date
(Reissue) Check (Reissue) Vendor #
Reissued
Amount
3/12/2026 198975 6918

ACCOUNTING
ERROR $ 770.95 3/19/2026 199095 6918 $ 770.95
TOTALS $770.95 $770.95
Voided Checks
March 2026
143
Start End Date Description Check Total
14059 14063 3/6/2026 Warrant Register 2,265.13 $
14064 14068 3/20/2026 Warrant Register 2,264.31 $
TOTALS 4,529.44 $
CHECKS USED 10
March 2026
Payroll ‐ Manual
144

CITY OF BANNING

STAFF REPORT
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Elizabeth Gibbs, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Brandon Robinson, Electrical Engineering Supervisor Art Vela, Public Works Director
MEETING DATE: May 26, 2026
SUBJECT: Consideration of Resolution 2026-77, Approving the Professional Services Agreement with Cornerstone Utility Engineering RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt Resolution 2026-77
BACKGROUND:

The City of Banning Electric Utility Department (BEU) staff currently administers an array of services including management of capital improvement and infrastructure projects related to the design and construction of electric power distribution systems. In addition to managing these projects, staff is also responsible for completing design review and inspections for various projects completed by BEU and the City’s Public Works Department. To maintain an acceptable level of service, BEU executed a contract with Cornerstone Development Company through Resolution 2023-138 for professional engineering services to assist with completing engineering design for the BEU’s Capital Improvement Program (CIP).

Since the execution of the original contract, the Cornerstone Development Company has since been renamed to Cornerstone Utility Engineering ("Cornerstone").

The scope of services requested will include but not be limited to project management, engineering and design, environmental review and permitting, assistance with procurement of materials and equipment, and engineering services during construction for the following existing CIP projects already in design with Cornerstone:

Sun Lakes Blvd Extension Project
Mias Canyon Line Hardening Project
Robertson’s Ready Mix Pole Relocation
Lincoln Street 34.5kV Circuit Re-Route
The recommendation to execute a new professional agreement was presented by staff to the Banning City Management and Finance staff and a case was made by BEU to continue the working relationship with Cornerstone to assist with the completion of the ongoing BEU’s capital improvement program due to Cornerstone being the engineer of record. The previous contract (Resolution 2023-138) with Cornerstone expired with a remaining amount of $302,250, however the requested amount for the new contract has been reduced to $100,000 to cover expenses related to the engineering support for the four CIP projects that have been identified. A Sole Source Justification was provided to Purchasing from BEU staff to justify the need for consistency and continuity with ongoing BEU projects. Staff recommends approving a new Professional Services Agreement in the amount of $100,000 with services ending two years following the execution of the contract.
145
JUSTIFICATION:

Cornerstone Utility Engineering has proven to be a responsible contractor that has effectively and successfully provided professional design engineering services for BEU's CIP projects. It is essential that the City preserves this relationship for current projects that are administered by BEU and the Cornerstone team being the engineer of record in the design and engineering of the City's 4 existing CIP projects. This recommendation was provided in the Sole Source Justification from BEU staff.

If approved, this Professional Services Agreement will allow Cornerstone to carry out professional services in support of the select ongoing BEU projects through completion. BEU intends to solicit a new Request for Proposals (“RFP”) for qualified engineering firms to assist with the BEU's future capital improvement demands.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Total costs over the two-year agreement shall not exceed a contract value of $100,000. The work will be funded by the Electric Improvement Fund 673, via savings that will be transferred from accounts with unused budgets. No additional appropriations are being requested at this time. The consultant will invoice the City on a monthly basis so long as funded contract tasks have been completed, with an itemized list of work performed, along with delivery of the specific work products.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. CC Resolution No. 2026-77.docx

2. Contract No. C01267 Cornerstone Utility Engineering - Engineering Services.pdf

3. CC Resolution No. 2023-138.pdf
146
Resolution 2026-77

RESOLUTION 2026-77

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BANNING, CALIFORNIA,

APPROVING A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH CORNERSTONE

UTILITY ENGINEERING
WHEREAS, the Banning Electric Utility (BEU) requires professional electrical engineering services to complete several capital improvement projects; and WHEREAS, the City executed a two-year contract with Cornerstone Development Company (“Cornerstone”) through City Council Resolution 2023-138 for professional engineering services; and
WHEREAS, a recommendation to extend the professional services provided by Cornerstone as the engineer of record to cover the completion of Sun Lakes Blvd Extension Project, Mias Canyon Line Hardening Project, Robertson’s Ready Mix Pole Relocation, Lincoln Street 34.5kV Circuit Re-Route which are all ongoing projects for BEU’s capital improvement program; and
WHEREAS, the previous contract with Cornerstone expired with a remaining amount of $302,250, however the requested amount for the new contract has been reduced to $100,000; and
WHEREAS, Cornerstone has proven to be a responsible contractor that has effectively and successfully provided professional design engineering services for the City’s Electric Utility capital projects, and it is essential that the City preserve this relationship for the current projects that are administered by BEU; and
WHEREAS, the services will continue to be funded by the Electric Fund and transferred to the appropriate account to be determined at the time of execution for each specific project. The total cost over the full term of the contract shall not exceed $100,000.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Banning as follows:

SECTION 1. The City of Banning City Council approves Resolution No. 2026-77 approving the Professional Services Agreement to Cornerstone Utility Engineering in the amount of $100,000 for a term of two years.

SECTION 2. City Council authorizes the City Manager, or his designee to make necessary budget adjustments, appropriations and transfers related to this Professional Services Agreement with Cornerstone Utility Engineering.

SECTION 3. The City Manager or her designee is authorized to make necessary nonsubstantive adjustments to the Professional Services Agreement to Cornerstone Utility Engineering.
147
Resolution 2026-77

SECTION 4. City Council authorizes the City Manager, or his designee to execute the Professional Services Agreement with Cornerstone Utility Engineering.

SECTION 5. The City Clerk is authorized to certify the adoption of this resolution and shall cause a certified resolution to be filed in the book of original resolutions.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 26th day of May 2026.

Richard Royce, Mayor
City of Banning
ATTEST:

Sandra Calderon, Deputy City Clerk
City of Banning

APPROVED AS TO FORM AND
LEGAL CONTENT:

John Pinkney, City Attorney
Slovak, Baron, Empey, Murphy, &
Pinkney LLP
148
Resolution 2026-77

CERTIFICATION:

I, Sandra Calderon, Deputy City Clerk of the City of Banning, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution 2026-77, was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Banning, California, at a regular meeting thereof held on the 26th day of May 2026 by the following vote, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Sandra Calderon, Deputy City Clerk
City of Banning, California
149
Resolution 2026-77

Exhibit A
Draft Amendment to Agreement with Cornerstone Utility Engineering 150
PS Version 1 Last Reviewed: 3/4/2026
1 AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES (C01267)

BY INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR

THIS AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BY INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR (“Agreement”) is made and effective as of the ____________ by and between the CITY OF BANNING, a California municipal corporation (“City”) whose address is 99 East Ramsey Street, Banning, California 92220, and CORNERSTONE UTILITY ENGINEERING, a California corporation whose address is 13392 Amargosa Road, Victorville, California 92392 (“Contractor”).

City and Contractor are sometimes hereinafter individually referred to as “party” and hereinafter collectively referred to as the “parties.”

RECITALS
This Agreement is entered into on the basis of the following facts, understandings and intentions of the parties to this Agreement:

A. City desires to engage Contractor to provide the following services: engineering and related support services for tasks identified in Exhibit “D”; and B. Contractor has made a proposal (“Proposal”) to the City to provide such professional services, which Proposal is attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and incorporated herein by this reference; and
C. Contractor agrees to provide such services pursuant to, and in accordance with, the terms and conditions of this Agreement, and represents and warrants to City that Contractor possesses the necessary skills, licenses, certifications, qualifications, personnel and equipment to provide such services.

AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing Recitals and mutual covenants contained herein, City and Contractor agree as follows:

1. Term of Agreement. This Agreement is effective as of the date first above written and shall continue until terminated as provided for herein. This Agreement shall remain in effect for a period of two (2) years from the Effective Date, unless earlier terminated as provided herein.

The term may be extended for additional periods, upon mutual written agreement of the parties and approval by the City Council.
151
PS Version 1 Last Reviewed: 3/4/2026
2 2. Services to be Performed. Contractor agrees to provide the services (“Services”) as follows: engineering, design, environmental, project management, and procurement support services in accordance with Exhibit “A” including, but not limited to, preparation of studies, reports, plans, specifications, cost estimates, schedules, bid and contract documents, and other technical or administrative deliverables; coordination with City staff, public agencies, and stakeholders; assistance with permitting and regulatory approvals; support during bidding and construction phases; and general advisory services related to City infrastructure and development projects. All Services shall be performed in the manner and according to the timeframe set forth in the Proposal. Contractor designates Chad Shaules, Chief Executive Officer as Contractor’s Representative responsible for overseeing the Services provided by Contractor (“Contractor’s Representative”). City designates the City Manager, or his or her designee, to act as the Project Manager (“Project Manager”) in connection with the delivery of Services under this Agreement.

Contractor shall supply, at its sole expense, all equipment, tools, materials, and supplies necessary to perform Services. In the event that the Proposal contains terms that are in addition to or in conflict with this Agreement, other than the price for Services, such terms shall not be valid and shall be of no force or effect.

3. Associates and Subcontractors. Contractor may, at Contractor’s sole cost and expense, employ such competent and qualified independent associates, subcontractors and consultants as Contractor deems necessary to perform the Services; provided, however, that Contractor shall not subcontract any of the Services without the prior written consent of City.

Contractor shall ensure that all subcontractors comply with the requirements of this Agreement, including, but not limited to, insurance, indemnification, and licensing requirements.

4. Compensation.

4.01 Contractor shall be paid at the rates set forth in the Proposal and shall not increase any rate without the prior written consent of the City. Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, total fees and charges paid by City to Contractor under this Agreement shall not exceed the amount of One Hundred Thousand Dollars and Zero Cents ($100,000.00).

4.02 Contractor shall not be compensated for any Services rendered nor reimbursed for any expenses incurred in excess of those authorized unless approved in advance by the City, in writing.

4.03 Contractor shall submit to City, on or before the fifteenth (15th) of each month, itemized invoices for the Services rendered in the previous month. The City shall not be obligated to pay any invoice that is submitted more than sixty (60) days after the due date of such invoice. City shall have the right to review and audit all invoices prior to or after payment to Contractor. This review and audit may include, but not be limited to City’s:
152
PS Version 1 Last Reviewed: 3/4/2026
3 a. Determination that any hourly fee charged is consistent with this Agreement's approved hourly rate schedule;
b. Verification that the hours billed, when multiplied by the approved hourly rates, result in the correct total;
c. Determination that each item charged is the usual, customary, and reasonable charge for the particular item. If City determines an item charged is greater than usual, customary, or reasonable, or is duplicative, ambiguous, excessive, or inappropriate, City shall either return the bill to Contractor with a request for explanation or adjust the payment accordingly and give notice to Contractor of the adjustment.

4.04 If the work is satisfactorily completed, City shall pay such invoice within thirty (30) days of its receipt. Should City dispute any portion of any invoice, City shall pay the undisputed portion within the time stated above, and at the same time advise Contractor in writing of the disputed portion.

5. Obligations of Contractor.

5.01 Contractor agrees to perform all Services in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement and the Proposal. In the event that the terms of the Proposal shall conflict with the terms of this Agreement or contain additional terms that purport to bind the City other than the Services to be rendered and the hourly rate for the Services, the terms of this Agreement shall govern and said additional or conflicting terms shall be of no force or effect.

5.02 Except as otherwise agreed by the parties, Contractor will supply all personnel, materials and equipment required to perform the Services. Contractor shall provide its own offices, telephones, vehicles and computers. Contractor will determine the method, details, and means of performing the Services under this Agreement.

5.03 Contractor shall keep City informed as to the progress of the Services by means of regular and frequent consultations. Additionally, when requested by City, Contractor shall prepare written status reports.

5.04 Contractor is responsible for paying, when due, all income and other taxes, fees, and withholding, including withholding state and federal taxes, social security, unemployment and worker’s compensation, incurred as a result of the compensation paid under this Agreement. Contractor agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless City for any claims, 153
PS Version 1 Last Reviewed: 3/4/2026
4 costs, losses, fees, penalties, interest, or damages suffered by City resulting from Contractor’s failure to comply with this provision.

5.05 In the event Contractor is required to prepare plans, drawings, specifications and/or estimates, the same shall be furnished in conformance with local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations.

5.06 Contractor represents that it possesses all required licenses necessary or applicable to the performance of Services under this Agreement and the Proposal and shall obtain and keep in full force and effect all permits and approvals required to perform the Services herein.

In the event City is required to obtain an approval or permit from another governmental entity, Contractor shall provide all necessary supporting documents to be filed with such entity.

5.07 Contractor shall be solely responsible for obtaining Employment Eligibility Verification information from Contractor’s employees, in compliance with the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986, Pub. L. 99-603 (8 U.S.C. 1324a), and shall ensure that Contractor’s employees are eligible to work in the United States.

5.08 In the event that Contractor employs, contracts with, or otherwise utilizes any CalPERS retirees in completing any of the Services performed hereunder, such instances shall be disclosed in advance to the City and shall be subject to the City’s advance written approval.

5.09 Drug-free Workplace Certification. By signing this Agreement, the Contractor hereby certifies under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the Contractor will comply with the requirements of the Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1990 (Government Code, Section 8350 et seq.) and will provide a drug-free workplace.

5.10 Contractor shall comply with all applicable local, state and federal laws, rules, regulations, entitlements and/or permits applicable to, or governing the Services authorized hereunder including, but not limited to California Department of Industrial Relations (Cal/OSHA) regulations; and the U.S. Department of Transportation Omnibus Transportation Employee Testing Act, related to their scope of work and operations. In case of conflict, the most stringent shall apply.

5.11 Contractor shall keep itself informed concerning and shall render all Services hereunder in accordance with all ordinances, resolutions, statutes, rules, and regulations of the City and any federal, state or local governmental entity having jurisdiction in effect at the time service is rendered.
154
PS Version 1 Last Reviewed: 3/4/2026
5 5.12 By executing this Agreement, Contractor warrants that Contractor (i) has thoroughly investigated and considered the scope of Services to be performed, (ii) has carefully considered how the Services should be performed, and (iii) fully understands the conditions, circumstances, difficulties and restrictions attending performance of the Services under this Agreement. If the Services involve work upon any site, Contractor warrants that Contractor has or will investigate the site and is or will be fully acquainted with the conditions there existing, prior to commencement of Services hereunder. Should the Contractor discover any latent or unknown conditions, which will materially affect the performance of the Services hereunder, Contractor shall immediately inform the City of such facts and shall not proceed except at Contractor’s sole risk until written instructions are received from the Project Manager.

Contractor warrants all Services under the Agreement to be of good quality and free from any defective or faulty material and workmanship. Contractor agrees that for a period of one year (or the period of time specified elsewhere in the Agreement or in any guarantee or warranty provided by any manufacturer or supplier of equipment or materials incorporated into the Services, whichever is later) after the date of final acceptance, Contractor shall within ten (10) days after being notified in writing by the City of any defect in the Services or non-conformance of the Services to the Agreement, commence and prosecute with due diligence all Services necessary to fulfill the terms of the warranty at Contractor’s sole cost and expense. Contractor shall act sooner as requested by the City in response to an emergency. In addition, Contractor shall, at its sole cost and expense, repair and replace any portions of the Services (or work of other contractors) damaged by Contractor’s defective Services or which becomes damaged in the course of repairing or replacing defective Services. For any Services so corrected, Contractor’s obligation hereunder to correct defective Services shall be reinstated for an additional one-year period, commencing with the date of acceptance of such corrected Services. All costs associated with such corrective actions and testing, including the removal, replacement, and reinstitution of equipment and materials necessary to gain access, shall be the sole responsibility of Contractor.

In the event that Contractor fails to fulfil its obligations under this Section, or under any other warranty or guaranty under this Agreement, to the satisfaction of the City, the City shall have the right to correct and replace any defective or non-conforming Services and any work damaged by such services or the replacement or correction thereof at Contractor’s sole expense. Contractor shall be obligated to fully reimburse the City for any expenses incurred hereunder upon demand.

Payment to Contractor for work performed pursuant to this Agreement shall not be deemed to waive any defects in work performed by Contractor.

5.13 Time is of the essence in the performance of this Agreement. 155
PS Version 1 Last Reviewed: 3/4/2026
6 6. Insurance. Contractor hereby agrees to be solely responsible for the health and safety of its employees and agents in performing the Services under this Agreement and shall comply with all laws applicable to worker safety including but not limited to Cal-OSHA.

Therefore, throughout the duration of this Agreement, Contractor hereby covenants and agrees to maintain insurance in conformance with the requirements set forth below. Attached hereto as Exhibit “B” are copies of Certificates of Insurance and endorsements as required by Section 7.02.

If existing coverage does not meet the requirements set forth herein, Contractor agrees to amend, supplement or endorse the existing coverage to do so. Contractor shall provide the following types and amounts of insurance:

6.01 Commercial general liability insurance in an amount of not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence and $2,000,000 in the aggregate; Contractor agrees to have its insurer endorse the general liability coverage required herein to include as additional insured’s City, its officials, employees and agents. Contractor also agrees to require all contractors and subcontractors to provide the same coverage required under this Section 6.

6.02 Business Auto Coverage in an amount no less than $1 million per accident.

If Contractor or Contractor’s employees will use personal autos in performance of the Services hereunder, Contractor shall provide evidence of personal auto liability coverage for each such person.

6.03 Workers’ Compensation insurance for any of Contractor’s employees that will be providing any Services hereunder. Contractor will have a state-approved policy form providing statutory benefits as required by California law. The provisions of any Workers’ Compensation insurance will not limit the obligations of Contractor under this Agreement.

Contractor expressly agrees not to use any statutory immunity defenses under such laws with respect to City, its employees, officials and agents. Sole proprietors with no employees, LLCs, or partnerships using the services of members or partners who do not carry Workers’ Compensation insurance acknowledge that they are not subject to the Workers’ Compensation Act of the State of California and agree to complete a signed workers compensation exemption form.

6.04 Optional Insurance Coverage. Choose and check one: Required _X_ /Not Required __; Errors and omissions insurance in a minimum amount of $2 million per occurrence to cover any negligent acts or omissions committed by Contractor, its employees and/or agents in the performance of any Services for City.

6.05 Cyber Liability Insurance REQUIRED IF CHECKED HERE ONLY [__] (Technology Professional Liability – Errors and Omissions), with limits not less than $2,000,000 per occurrence or claim, and $2,000,000 aggregate or the full per occurrence limits of the policies available, whichever is greater. Coverage shall be sufficiently broad to respond to the duties and 156
PS Version 1 Last Reviewed: 3/4/2026
7 obligations as is undertaken by Contractor in this Agreement and shall include, but not be limited to, claims involving infringement of intellectual property, including but not limited to infringement of copyright, trademark, trade dress, invasion of privacy violations, information theft, damage to or destruction of electronic information, release of private information, alteration of electronic information, extortion and network security. The policy shall provide coverage for breach response costs as well as regulatory fines and penalties as well as credit monitoring expenses with limits sufficient to respond to these obligations. Contractor will file with City, before beginning professional services, certificates of insurance (Acord Form 25 or equivalent) satisfactory to City evidencing.

6.06 If Claims Made Policies (applies only to professional liability and cyber liability policies):
i. The Retroactive Date must be shown and must be before the date of the contract or the beginning of contract work.
ii. Insurance must be maintained, and evidence of insurance must be provided for at least five (5) years after completion of the contract of work. iii. If coverage is canceled or non-renewed and not replaced with another claims-made policy form with a Retroactive Date prior to the contract effective date, the Contractor must purchase “extended reporting” coverage for a minimum of five (5) years after completion of the contract work.

7. General Conditions pertaining to Insurance Coverage.

7.01 No liability insurance coverage provided shall prohibit Contractor from waiving the right of subrogation prior to a loss. Contractor waives all rights of subrogation against City regardless of the applicability of insurance proceeds and shall require all contractors and subcontractors to do the same.

7.02 Prior to beginning the Services under this Agreement, Contractor shall furnish City with certificates of insurance, endorsements, and upon request, complete copies of all policies, including complete copies of all endorsements. All copies of policies and endorsements shall show the signature of a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf.

7.03 All required policies shall be issued by a highly rated insurer with a minimum A.M. Best rating of “A:VII”. The insurer(s) shall be admitted and licensed to do business in California. The certificates of insurance hereunder shall state that coverage shall not be 157
PS Version 1 Last Reviewed: 3/4/2026
8 suspended, voided, canceled by either party, or reduced in coverage or in limits, except after thirty (30) days' prior written notice has been given to CITY.

7.04 Self-insurance does not comply with these insurance specifications.

Contractor acknowledges and agrees that that all insurance coverage required to be provided by Contractor or any subcontractor, shall apply first and on a primary, non-contributing basis in relation to any other insurance, indemnity or self-insurance available to City.

7.05 All coverage types and limits required are subject to approval, modification and additional requirements by City, as the need arises. Contractor shall not make any reductions in scope of coverage (e.g. elimination of contractual liability or reduction of discovery period) that may affect City’s protection without City’s prior written consent.

7.06 Contractor agrees to provide immediate notice to City of any claim or loss against Contractor or arising out of the Services performed under this Agreement. City assumes no obligation or liability by such notice, but has the right (but not the duty) to monitor the handling of any such claim or claims if they are likely to involve City.

7.07 The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to City, its directors, officers, employees, or authorized volunteers. If the Contractor maintains broader coverage and/or higher limits than the minimums shown above, the City requires and shall be entitled to the broader coverage and/or higher limits maintained by the Contractor. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum limits of insurance and coverage shall be available to the City.

8. Indemnification.

8.01 Contractor and City agree that City, its employees, agents and officials should, to the extent permitted by law, be fully protected from any loss, injury, damage, claim, lawsuit, cost, expense, attorneys’ fees, litigation costs, defense costs, court costs or any other costs arising out of or in any way related to the performance of this Agreement by Contractor or any subcontractor or agent of either as set forth herein. Accordingly, the provisions of this indemnity are intended by the parties to be interpreted and construed to provide the fullest protection possible under the law to City. Contractor acknowledges that City would not enter into this Agreement in the absence of the commitment of Contractor to defend, indemnify, and protect City as set forth herein.
a. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Contractor shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless City, its employees, agents and officials, from and against any liability, claims, suits, actions, arbitration proceedings, administrative proceedings, regulatory 158
PS Version 1 Last Reviewed: 3/4/2026
9 proceedings, losses, injuries, expenses, damages or costs of any kind, whether actual, alleged or threatened, actual attorneys’ fees incurred by City, court costs, interest, defense costs, including expert witness fees and any other costs or expenses of any kind whatsoever without restriction or limitation incurred in relation to, as a consequence of or arising out of, or in any way attributable actually, allegedly or impliedly, in whole or in part to the performance of this Agreement.

Contractor’s obligation to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless shall include any and all claims, suits, and proceedings in which Contractor (and/or Contractor’s agents and/or employees) is alleged to be an employee of City. All obligations under this provision are to be paid by Contractor as they are incurred by City.
b. Without affecting the rights of City under any provision of this Agreement or this Section, Contractor shall not be required to indemnify and hold harmless City as set forth above for liability attributable solely to the fault of City, provided such fault is determined by agreement between the parties or the findings of a court of competent jurisdiction. 8A Indemnification Design Professionals. In the event that Contractor is a design professional under California Civil Code Section 2782.8 this Section 8A shall apply instead of Section 8. To the fullest extent permitted by California law and in accordance with California Civil Code section 2782.8, Contractor shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its officers, employees, trustees and members (“Indemnified Parties”) from any and all actions, assessments, counts, citations, claims, costs, damages, demands, judgments, liabilities (legal, administrative or otherwise), losses, notices, expenses, fines, penalties, proceedings, responsibilities, violations, attorney’s and consultants’ fees and causes of action including, but not limited to those for, injury to property or persons, including personal injury and/or death (“Claim(s)”), to the extent that the Claim(s) arises out of, pertains to, or relates to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of Contractor, its directors, officials, officers, employees and consultants arising out of, connected with, or resulting from the performance of the Services, the Project, or this Agreement. This indemnity excludes liability caused by the negligence or willful misconduct of any of the Indemnified Parties. The cost to indemnify, hold harmless, and defend charged to Contractor shall not exceed Contractor’s proportionate percentage of fault.

9. Additional Services, Changes and Deletions.

9.01. In the event Contractor performs additional or different services than those described herein without the prior written approval of the City Manager and/or City Council of City, Contractor shall not be compensated for such services. Contractor expressly waives any right to be compensated for services and materials not covered by the scope of this Agreement or authorized by the City in writing.
159
PS Version 1 Last Reviewed: 3/4/2026
10 9.02 Contractor shall promptly advise the City Manager and Finance Director of City as soon as reasonably practicable upon gaining knowledge of a condition, event or accumulation of events which may affect the scope and/or cost of Services. All proposed changes, modifications, deletions and/or requests for additional services shall be reduced to writing for review and approval by the City and/or City Council.

10. Termination of Agreement.

10.01. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, City, at its sole option, may terminate this Agreement with or without cause, or for no cause, at any time by giving twenty (20) days’ written notice to Contractor.

10.02 In the event of termination, the payment of monies due Contractor for undisputed Services performed prior to the effective date of such termination shall be paid within thirty (30) business days after receipt of an invoice as provided in this Agreement. Immediately upon termination, Contractor agrees to promptly provide and deliver to City all original documents, reports, studies, plans, specifications and the like which are in the possession or control of Contractor and pertain to City.

11. Status of Contractor.

11.01 Contractor shall perform the Services in Contractor’s own way as an independent contractor, and in pursuit of Contractor’s independent calling, and not as an employee of City. However, Contractor shall regularly confer with City’s City Manager or Project Manager as provided for in this Agreement.

11.02 Contractor agrees that it is not entitled to the rights and benefits afforded to City’s employees, including disability or unemployment insurance, Workers’ Compensation, retirement, CalPERS, medical insurance, sick leave, or any other employment benefit. Contractor is responsible for providing, at its own expense, disability, unemployment, Workers’ Compensation and other insurance, training, permits, and licenses for itself and its employees and subcontractors.

11.03 Contractor hereby specifically represents and warrants to City that it possesses the qualifications and skills necessary to perform the Services under this Agreement in a competent, professional manner, without the advice or direction of City and that the Services to be rendered pursuant to this Agreement shall be performed in accordance with the standards customarily applicable to an experienced and competent professional rendering the same or similar services in the same geographic area where the City is located. Further, Contractor represents and warrants that the individual signing this Agreement on behalf of Contractor has the full authority to bind Contractor to this Agreement.
160
PS Version 1 Last Reviewed: 3/4/2026
11 12. Ownership of Documents; Audit.

12.01 All draft and final reports, plans, drawings, studies, maps, photographs, specifications, data, notes, manuals, warranties, and all other documents of any kind or nature prepared, developed, or obtained by Contractor in connection with the performance of Services performed for the City shall become the sole property of City, and Contractor shall promptly deliver all such materials to City upon request. At the City’s sole discretion, Contractor may be permitted to retain original documents, and furnish reproductions to City upon request, at no cost to City.

12.02 Subject to applicable federal and state laws, rules and regulations, City shall hold all intellectual property rights to any materials developed pursuant to this Agreement.

Contractor shall not use such data or documents for purposes other than the performance of this Agreement, nor shall Contractor release, reproduce, distribute, publish, adapt for future use or any other purposes, or otherwise use, any data or other materials first produced in the performance of this Agreement, nor authorize others to do so, without the prior written consent of City.

12.03 Contractor shall retain and maintain, for a period not less than four years following termination of this Agreement, all-time records, accounting records and vouchers and all other records with respect to all matters concerning Services performed, compensation paid and expenses reimbursed. At any time during normal business hours and as often as City may deem necessary, Contractor shall make available to City’s agents for examination all of such records and shall permit City’s agents to audit, examine and reproduce such records.

12.04 Contractor acknowledges that the City is a California municipal corporation and is subject to the California Public Records Act, Government Code § 7920.000 et seq. (“CPRA”), and other applicable laws requiring public access to records. Contractor further acknowledges and agrees that any and all documents, records, data, writings, communications, materials, and other information of any kind, in any format (including electronic format), that Contractor (or any associate, subcontractor, consultant, or agent of Contractor) prepares, develops, obtains, provides, transmits, or submits to the City, or that are otherwise received or maintained by the City, in connection with this Agreement or the Services may constitute public records and may be subject to disclosure to third parties in response to a CPRA request, unless the City determines that all or a portion of the Submitted Materials are exempt from disclosure under the CPRA or other applicable law.

13. Miscellaneous Provisions.
161
PS Version 1 Last Reviewed: 3/4/2026
12 13.01 This Agreement, which includes all attached exhibits, supersedes any and all previous agreements, either oral or written, between the parties hereto with respect to the rendering of Services by Contractor for City and contains all of the covenants and agreements between the parties with respect to the rendering of such Services in any manner whatsoever. Any modification of this Agreement will be effective only if it is in writing signed by both parties.

13.02 Contractor shall not assign or otherwise transfer any rights or interest in this Agreement without the prior written consent of City. Unless specifically stated to the contrary in any written consent to an assignment, no assignment will release or discharge the assignor from any duty or responsibility under this Agreement.

13.03 Contractor shall timely file FPPC Form 700 Conflict of Interest Statements with City if required by California law and/or the City’s conflict of interest policy.

13.04 If any legal action or proceeding, including an action for declaratory relief, is brought to enforce or interpret the provisions of this Agreement, the prevailing party will be entitled to reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs, in addition to any other relief to which that party may be entitled.

13.05 This Agreement is made, entered into and shall be performed in the County of Riverside in the State of California and shall in all respects be interpreted, enforced and governed under the laws of the State of California. The parties agree that venue in any litigation between them shall be in Riverside County, California.

13.06 Contractor covenants that neither it nor any officer or principal of its firm has any interest, nor shall they acquire any interest, either directly or indirectly, which will conflict in any manner or degree with the performance of their Services hereunder. Contractor further covenants that in the performance of this Agreement, no person having such interest shall be employed by it as an officer, employee, agent, or subcontractor.

13.07 Contractor has read and is aware of the provisions of Section 1090 et seq. and Section 87100 et seq. of the Government Code relating to conflicts of interest of public officers and employees. Contractor agrees that they are unaware of any financial or economic interest of any public officer or employee of the City relating to this Agreement. It is further understood and agreed that if such a financial interest does exist at the inception of this Agreement, the City may immediately terminate this Agreement by giving notice thereof. Contractor shall comply with the requirements of Government Code section 87100 et seq. and section 1090 in the performance of and during the term of this Agreement.
162
PS Version 1 Last Reviewed: 3/4/2026
13 13.08 Improper Consideration. Contractor shall not offer (either directly or through an intermediary) any improper consideration such as, but not limited to, cash, discounts, services, the provision of travel or entertainment, or any items of value to any officer, employee or agent of the City in an attempt to secure favorable treatment regarding this Agreement or any contract awarded by City. The City, by notice, may immediately terminate this Agreement if it determines that any improper consideration as described in the preceding sentence was offered to any officer, employee or agent of the City with respect to the proposal and award process of this Agreement or any City contract. This prohibition shall apply to any amendment, extension or evaluation process once this Agreement or any City contract has been awarded. Contractor shall immediately report any attempt by any City officer, employee or agent to solicit (either directly or through an intermediary) improper consideration from Contractor.

13.09 Severability. If any portion, section, sentence, provision or paragraph of this Agreement is declared invalid, illegal, or otherwise unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the entire balance of this Agreement not so affected shall remain in full force and effect.

13.10 Prevailing Wages. Contractor shall be responsible to comply with applicable prevailing wages laws. As a condition of payment, if applicable Contractor shall show proof of payment of wages under applicable state and federal laws and regulations relating to prevailing wages in accordance with the “General Wage Determination Made By the Director of Industrial Relations Pursuant To California Labor Code, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 2, Sections 1770, 1773, 1773.1, 1773.5, and 1773.9”, for Riverside County and/or 40 U.S.C. Section 276a, et. seq.

Such wage rates shall conform with those posted at City offices and the project site. In the event that the Contractor fails to pay the prevailing wages, the Contractor shall be solely liable for penalties and for the shortfall in wages and shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless City under Section 8.01 against any of the same. The following Labor Code sections are hereby referenced and made a part of this Agreement:

1. Section 1771 - Requirement to Pay Prevailing Wages

2. Section 1773.1 – Per Diem Wages; Travel and Subsistence Pay.

3. Section 1774 – Payment of Prevailing Wage Rates.

4. Section 1775 - Penalty for Failure to Comply with Prevailing Wage Rates.

5. Section 1776 – Payroll Records and Certified Payroll Reports.

6. Section 1777.5 - Apprenticeship Requirements.

7. Sections 1810 and 1811 - Working Hour Restrictions.

8. Section 1813 - Penalty for Failure to Pay Overtime.

13.11 Covenant Against Discrimination. Contractor covenants that, by and for itself, its heirs, executors, assigns and all persons claiming under or through them, that there shall 163
PS Version 1 Last Reviewed: 3/4/2026
14 be no discrimination against or segregation of, any person or group of persons on account of race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, national origin, or ancestry in the performance of this Agreement. Contractor shall take affirmative action to ensure that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, national origin or ancestry.

13.12 Waiver. Waiver by any party to this Agreement of any term, condition, or covenant of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other term, condition, or covenant.

Waiver by any party of any breach of the provisions of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other provision or a waiver of any subsequent breach or violation of any provision of this Agreement. Acceptance by City of any work or Services by Contractor shall not constitute a waiver of any of the provisions of this Agreement. No delay or omission in the exercise of any right or remedy by a non-defaulting party on any default shall impair such right or remedy or be construed as a waiver. Any waiver by either party of any default must be in writing and shall not be a waiver of any other default concerning the same or any other provision of this Agreement.

13.13 Rights and Remedies are Cumulative. Except with respect to rights and remedies expressly declared to be exclusive in this Agreement, the rights and remedies of the parties are cumulative and the exercise by either party of one or more of such rights or remedies shall not preclude the exercise by it, at the same or different times, of any other rights or remedies for the same default or any other default by the other party.

13.14 Legal Action. In addition to any other rights or remedies, either party may take legal action, in law or in equity, to cure, correct or remedy any default, to recover damages for any default, to compel specific performance of this Agreement, to obtain declaratory or injunctive relief, or to obtain any other remedy consistent with the purpose of this Agreement.

13.15 Interpretation. The terms of this Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the meaning of the language used and shall not be construed for or against either party by reason of the authorship of this Agreement or any other rule of construction which might otherwise apply.

13.16 Force Majeure. Neither party shall be deemed in default of this Agreement to the extent that performance of its obligations is delayed or prevented by causes beyond its reasonable control, including but not limited to acts of God, war, terrorism, riots, fires, floods, epidemics, pandemics, earthquakes, strikes, labor disputes, governmental orders, or failure of utilities. The affected party shall promptly notify the other party in writing of the occurrence of such event and shall use reasonable efforts to resume performance as soon as practicable. Force majeure shall not excuse the obligation to make payments when due. In no event shall force majeure entitle Contractor to additional compensation, but only to a reasonable extension of time. 164
PS Version 1 Last Reviewed: 3/4/2026
15 13.17 Both parties agree to use reasonable care and diligence to perform their respective obligations under this Agreement. Both parties agree to act in good faith to execute all instruments, prepare all documents and take all actions as may be reasonably necessary to carry out the purposes of this Agreement. Unless hereafter specified neither party shall be responsible for the service of the other.

13.18 The parties acknowledge and agree that this Agreement may be executed by electronic signature, which shall be considered as an original signature for all purposes and shall have the same force and effect as an original signature. The parties expressly adopt and confirm each electronic signature made by a party to this Agreement, regardless of whether delivered in person, by mail, courier, facsimile, email, or in portable document format (PDF), as if the same were manually signed and delivered in person. Each party agrees not to assert that any electronic signature is inadequate to bind such party to the same extent as if signed manually and delivered in person.

13.19 The provisions of this Agreement that by their nature are intended to survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement shall survive such expiration or termination.

Without limiting the foregoing, the provisions relating to indemnification, ownership of documents and intellectual property, audit and records retention, insurance obligations, confidentiality, and payment obligations shall survive the termination or expiration of this Agreement.

13.20 Notice. Any notice, demand, request, consent, approval, or other communication required or permitted to be given under this Agreement (“Notice”) shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been duly given if delivered personally, sent by nationally recognized overnight courier, sent by certified or registered mail (return receipt requested), or sent by electronic mail, addressed as follows:

To City:

City of Banning
Attn: City Manager
99 East Ramsey Street
Banning, California 92220
Email: [email protected]
To Contractor:

Cornerstone Utility Engineering
Attn: Chad Shaules
13392 Amargosa Rd
Victorville California 92392
165
PS Version 1 Last Reviewed: 3/4/2026
16 Email: [email protected]
Notices shall be deemed received as follows: (i) on the date of delivery if delivered personally; (ii) one (1) business day after deposit with a nationally recognized overnight courier; (iii) three (3) business days after deposit in the United States mail, postage prepaid; or (iv) on the date transmitted if sent by electronic mail during normal business hours of the receiving party, or on the next business day if sent after normal business hours. Either party may change its address for Notice by providing written Notice of such change to the other party in accordance with this Section.

13.21 This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which when executed and delivered shall be deemed to be an original, and all of which counterparts taken together shall constitute one and the same instrument for all purposes of this Agreement.

13.22 The recitals set forth in the preamble of this Agreement are hereby incorporated into and made a substantive part of this Agreement as if fully set forth herein. [SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE]
166
PS Version 1 Last Reviewed: 3/4/2026
17 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereby have made and executed this Agreement to be effective as of the day and year first above written.

CITY: CONTRACTOR:

CITY OF BANNING CONRNERSTONE UTILITY

ENGINEERING
By:_______________________ By:_______________________
Elizabeth Gibbs, City Manager Print
Name: ____________________
Date: ______________________
Date: _____________________
ATTEST:

By: ______________________
Sandra Calderon, Deputy City Clerk
Date: __________________
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

By: ______________________
John O. Pinkney, City Attorney
Date: __________________

167
PS Version 1 Last Reviewed: 3/4/2026
18 EXHIBIT “A”

PROPOSAL
168
PS Version 1 Last Reviewed: 3/4/2026
19 169
PS Version 1 Last Reviewed: 3/4/2026
20 170
PS Version 1 Last Reviewed: 3/4/2026
21 171
PS Version 1 Last Reviewed: 3/4/2026
22 172
PS Version 1 Last Reviewed: 3/4/2026
23 173
PS Version 1 Last Reviewed: 3/4/2026
24 174
PS Version 1 Last Reviewed: 3/4/2026
25 EXHIBIT “B”

CERTIFICATES OF INSURANCE
175
PS Version 1 Last Reviewed: 3/4/2026
26 EXHIBIT “D”

BUDGET FOR SCOPE OF SERVICES

TASK DESCRIPTION BUDGET
1 Sun Lakes Blvd Extension Project
 Provide support serviced through duration of
construction for relocating an existing utility
pole line consisting of both 34.5kV and

12.47kV circuits.
 Modify overhead reconductoring drawings to
meet current standards and specifications and
ensure conformance to Wildfire Mitigation
Plan.
 Complete Joint Pole Authorization (JPA) and
wind loading documentation as needed.
$35,000
2 Mias Canyon Line Hardening Project
 Provide design support services for
replacement of poles and conductor within
the Mias Canyon, one of the City’s high fire
threat district areas.
 Complete modifications to design drawings
as recommended in the Western Riverside
County Multiple Species Habitat
Conservation Plan (MSHCP) Consistency
Analysis.
 Complete JPA and wind loading
documentation as needed.
$25,000
3 Robertson’s Ready Mix Pole Relocation
 Complete relocation design updates based on
details of the Line Extension agreement upon
execution of the contract.
 Secure easements and provide land surveyor
documentation (legal descriptions and
boundary plats) for electric utility
infrastructure as needed.
$25,000
176
PS Version 1 Last Reviewed: 3/4/2026
27  Complete JPA and wind loading
documentation as needed.
4 Lincoln Street 34.5kV Circuit Re-Route
 Complete relocation plan updates and
coordination with Southern California
Edison for pole replacement, including JPA
and wind loading documentation as needed.
$15,000
TOTAL $100,000
Within the budgeted amounts for each Task, and with the approval of the Contract Manager, funds may be shifted from one Task sub-budget to another so long as the Contract Sum is not exceeded per Section 4.01, unless Additional Services are approved per Section 9.02. 177
RESOLUTION 2023-138

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BANNING, CALIFORNIA,

APPROVING A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH CORNERSTONE

DEVELOPMENT COMPANY OF HESPERIA, CALIFORNIA
WHEREAS, the Banning Electric Utility ( BEU) requires professional electrical engineering services to complete several capital improvement projects; and WHEREAS, the City executed a three-year contract not to exceed $ 900,000 with Cornerstone Development Company through City Council Resolution 2020-110 in September 2020 for professional engineering services; and WHEREAS, A recommendation to extend the existing professional agreement was presented by BEU staff to the Banning City Management and Finance to assist with the completion of future projects for the BEU's capital improvement program; and WHEREAS, Cornerstone Development Company has proven to be a responsible contractor that has effectively and successfully provided professional design engineering services for the City's Electric Utility capital projects; and WHEREAS, the existing contract with Cornerstone Development Company has expired on June 30, 2023 and it is essential that the City preserve this relationship for future projects that are administered by BEU; and
WHEREAS, BEU staff wish to reinstate the services under a new Professional Services Agreement with Cornerstone Development Company to replace the expired contract. The new Agreement will utilize the unused balance and remaining two (2) oneyear extensions remaining on the expired contract. The services will continue to be funded by the Electric Fund and transferred to the appropriate account to be determined at the time of execution for each specific project. The total cost over the full term of contract, including the initial three years, shall not exceed $547,290.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Banning as follows:

SECTION 1. The City of Banning City Council approves Resolution No. 2023-138 approving the Professional Services Agreement to Cornerstone Development Company in the amount of $547,290 with an expiration date of June 25, 2025.

SECTION 2. City Council authorizes the City Manager, or his designee to make necessary budget adjustments, appropriations and transfers related to this Professional Services Agreement with Cornerstone Development Company.

SECTION 3. City Council authorizes the City Manager, or his designee to execute the Professional Services Agreement with Cornerstone Development Company.

Resolution 2023- 138

178
SECTION 4. The City Clerk is authorized to certify the adoption of this resolution and shall cause a certified resolution to be filed in the book of original resolutions.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 22nd day of August 2023.

ATTEST:

Caroline Patton , De
City of Banning

APPROVED AS TO FORM AND
LEGAL CONTENT:

Serita R. Young, City Attorney
Richards , Watson & Gershon
Resolution 2023-138

Alberto San ez , Mayor
City of Ban ing
179
CERTIFICATION:

I, Caroline Patton , Deputy City Clerk of the City of Banning , California , do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution 2023-138 , was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Banning, California , at a regular meeting thereof held on the 22nd day of August 2023 by the following vote, to wit:

AYES : Gonzales , Minjares, and Sanchez.

NOES: Flynn.

ABSENT: Wallace.

ABSTAIN :

Resolution 2023- 138

Caroline Patton , Dep City Clerk
City of Banning , Californ ia .
180
Exhibit A
Draft Agreement with Cornerstone Development Company
Resolution 2023- 138

181
AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ( C00888) FOR

ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR THE ELECTRIC UTILITY

DEPARTMENT BY AND BETWEEN CITY OF BANNING AND

CORNERSTONE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
THIS AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ( herein " Agreement") is made and entered into this day: ________ , (" Effective Date") by and between the CITY OF BANNING, a California municipal corporation (" City") and CORNERSTONE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, a California corporation, (" Consultant"). City and Consultant are sometimes hereinafter individually referred to as " Party" and hereinafter collectively referred to as the " Parties."

RECITALS
A. City has sought, by issuance of a Request for Qualifications ( RFQ No. 19- 044), the performance of the services for the Engineering Services for the Electric Utility Department prepared in connection therewith, and as further defined and described particularly in Article 1 of this Agreement.

B. Consultant, following submission of a proposal or bid for the performance of the services defined and described particularly in Article 1 of this Agreement, was selected by City to perform those services.

C. The Parties desire to formalize the selection of Consultant for performance of those services defined and described particularly in Article I of this Agreement and desire that the terms of that performance be as particularly defined and described herein.

D. Pursuant to the City of Banning' s Municipal Code, City has authority to enter into this Agreement.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants made by the Parties and contained herein and other consideration, the value and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:

ARTICLE 1. SERVICES OF CONSULT ANT

1.1 Scope of Services.

In compliance with all terms and conditions of this Agreement, Consultant shall provide those services specified in the " Scope of Services" attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference, which services may be referred to herein as the " Services" hereunder. As a material inducement to City entering into this Agreement, Consultant represents and warrants that it has the qualifications, experience, and facilities necessary to properly perform the Services required under this Agreement in a thorough, competent, and professional manner, and is experienced in performing the Services contemplated herein. Consultant shall at all times faithfully, competently and to the best of its ability, experience and talent, perform all Services described herein. Consultant covenants that it shall follow the highest professional standards in 2344655v8
182
performing the Services required hereunder and that all materials will be of good quality, and fit for the purpose intended. For purposes of this Agreement, the phrase " highest professional standards" shall mean those standards of practice recognized by one or more first- class firms performing similar work under similar circumstances. This Agreement calls for services that, in whole or in part, constitute " public works" as defined in the California Labor Code. Therefore, as to those services that are " public works," Consultant shall comply in all respects with all applicable provisions of the California Labor Code, including those set forth in Exhibit B hereto.

1.2 Contract Documents and Exhibits.

This Agreement includes the Request for Proposal and Consultant' s accepted proposal Contract Documents"), both of which are on file with the City and incorporated herein by this general reference as though fully set forth herein. Exhibit A ( Scope of Services), Exhibit B Special Requirements), Exhibit C ( Schedule of Compensation), and Exhibit D ( Schedule of Performance) also constitute a part of this Agreement and are incorporated into this Agreement by this reference. Except as set forth in Section 1.10 regarding Exhibit B, this Agreement controls over the Contract Documents and the provisions in Exhibits A, B and C.

1.3 Compliance with Law.

Consultant shall keep itself informed concerning all ordinances, resolutions, statutes, rules, and regulations of City and any Federal, State or local governmental entity having jurisdiction in effect at the time service is rendered, and shall render all Services hereunder in accordance therewith.

1.4 Licenses, Permits, Fees and Assessments.

Consultant shall obtain and maintain during the term of this Agreement, at its sole cost and expense, all necessary licenses, permits, certificates and approvals required by law for the performance of Services under this Agreement, including a City business license. Consultant shall have the sole obligation to pay for all fees, assessments and taxes, plus applicable penalties and interest, which may be imposed by law and which arise from or are necessary for Consultant' s performance of the Services required by this Agreement. Consultant shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless City, its officers, employees or agents, against all such fees, assessments, taxes, penalties or interest levied, assessed or imposed against City hereunder.

1.5 Familiarity with Services.

By executing this Agreement, Consultant warrants that Consultant: ( i) has thoroughly investigated and considered the Scope of Services to be performed, ( ii) has carefully considered how the Services should be performed, and ( iii) fully understands the facilities and any difficulties and restrictions attending performance of the Services under this Agreement. If the Services involve work upon any site, Consultant warrants that Consultant has or will investigate the site and is or will be fully acquainted with the conditions existing therein, prior to commencement of Services hereunder. Should Consultant discover any latent or unknown conditions, which will materially affect the performance of the Services hereunder, Consultant shall immediately inform City of such fact and shall not proceed except at Consultant' s risk until written instructions are received from the Contract Officer ( defined in Section 1.12. A). 2-
11303- 000812465263v I.doc
183

1.6 Prevention of Loss and Damages.

Consultant shall adopt reasonable methods during the Term ( defined in Section 3.4) to furnish continuous protection to the work product, and the equipment, materials, papers, documents, plans, studies and/ or other components thereof to prevent losses or damages, and shall be responsible for all such damages, to persons or property, until acceptance of the Services by City, except such losses or damages as may be caused by City' s own negligence.

1. 7 Further Responsibilities of Parties.

Both Parties agree to use reasonable care and diligence to perform their respective obligations under this Agreement. Both Parties agree to act in good faith to execute all instruments, prepare all documents and take all actions as may be reasonable necessary to carry out the purposes of this Agreement. Unless hereafter specified, neither Party shall be responsible to perform the Services of the other.

1.8 Additional Services.

City shall have the right at any time during the performance of the Services, without invalidating this Agreement, to order extra services beyond that specified in the Scope of Services or to make changes by altering, adding to or deducting from the Services. No such extra services may be undertaken unless a written order is first given by the Contract Officer to Consultant, which written order incorporates therein an adjustment in ( i) the Contract Sum ( as defined in Section

2.1), and/ or (ii) the Schedule of Performance, ( as defined in Section 3.2), and which written order is approved in writing by Consultant. Any increase in compensation of up to ten percent ( 10%) of the Contract Sum, or $ 25,000, whichever is less; or in the Schedule of Performance of up to one hundred eighty ( 180) days may be approved by the Contract Officer. Any greater increases, taken either separately or cumulatively, must be approved by City Council. It is expressly understood by Consultant that the provisions of this Section shall not apply to Services which are specifically set forth in the Scope of Services or which are reasonably contemplated therein. Consultant hereby acknowledges that it accepts the risk that the Services to be provided pursuant to the Scope of Services may be more costly or time consuming than Consultant anticipates and that Consultant shall not be entitled to additional compensation therefor.

1.9 Facilities and Equipment.

Except as otherwise provided, Consultant shall, at its own cost and expense, provide all facilities and equipment necessary to perform the Services required by this Agreement. City shall make available to Consultant only physical facilities such as desks, filing cabinets, and conference space (" City Facilities"), as City deems, in its sole discretion, to be reasonably necessary for Consultant' s use while consulting with City employees and reviewing records and the information in possession of City. The location, quality, and time of furnishing City Facilities shall be in the sole discretion of City. In no event shall City be required to furnish any facilities that may involve incurring any direct expense, including but not limited to a computer, long distance telephone, network data, internet or other communication charges, vehicles and reproduction facilities. 3-
11303- 0008\ 2465263v I.doc
184

1.10 Special Requirements.

Additional terms and conditions of this Agreement, if any, which are made a part hereof are set forth in the " Special Requirements" attached hereto as Exhibit B and incorporated herein by this reference. In the event of a conflict between the provisions of Exhibit B and any other provisions of this Agreement, the provisions of Exhibit B shall govern.

1.11 Corrections.

In addition to the indemnification obligations set forth in Article 4, and Sections 1.4, 1.13,

5.3, 5.4, and 6.3, Consultant shall correct, at its expense, all errors in the Services which may be disclosed during City' s review of Consultant' s report or plans. Should Consultant fail to make such correction( s) in a reasonably timely manner, such correction( s) may be made by City, and the cost thereof shall be charged to Consultant. In addition to all other available remedies, City may deduct the cost of such correction( s) from any retention amount held by City, or may withhold payment otherwise owed Consultant under this Agreement up to the amount of the cost of correction( s), as provided in Section 6.3.

1.12 Party Representatives.

A. Contract Officer: For the purposes of this Agreement, the Contract Officer shall be the City Manager, or such other person designated in writing by the City Manager Contract Officer"). Unless otherwise specified herein, any approval of City required hereunder shall mean the approval of the Contract Officer. The Contract Officer shall have authority, if specified in writing by the City Manager, to sign all documents on behalf of City required hereunder to carry out the terms of this Agreement.

B. Principals and Personnel of Consultant.
1) Consultant Representative: The following principal of Consultant is hereby designated as being the Consultant Representative authorized to act on Consultant' s behalf regarding the Services specified herein and make all decisions in connection therewith:

Name Title
Chad Shaules Chief Executive Officer
It is expressly understood that the experience, knowledge, capability and reputation of the foregoing Consultant Representative were a substantial inducement for City to enter into this Agreement. Therefore, the foregoing Consultant Representative shall be responsible during the term of this Agreement for directing all activities of Consultant and devoting sufficient time to personally supervise the Services hereunder. All personnel of Consultant, and any authorized agents, shall at all times be under the exclusive direction and control of the Consultant Representative. For purposes of this Agreement, the foregoing Consultant Representative may not be replaced nor may their responsibilities be substantially reduced or reassigned by Consultant without the express written approval of City. It shall be Consultant' s responsibility to assure that the Contract Officer is kept informed of the progress of the performance of the Services, and Consultant shall refer any decisions which must be made by City to the Contract Officer. 4-
I 1303- 0008\ 2465263vl. doc
185
2) Consultant' s Personnel: Consultant has, or will secure at its own expense, all personnel required to perform the Services required under this Agreement. All of the Services required under this Agreement shall be performed by Consultant or under its supervision, and all personnel engaged in the Services shall be qualified to perform such Services. Consultant shall make every reasonable effort to maintain the stability and continuity of Consultant' s staff and sub- contractors, if any, assigned to perform the Services required under this Agreement.

Consultant shall notify City of all changes in Consultant' s staff and sub- contractors, if any, assigned to perform the Services required under this Agreement, prior to and during any such performance. In the event that City, in its sole discretion, at any time during the term of this Agreement, desires to reassign any staff or sub- contractor of Consultant, City shall give notice as set forth in Section 8.1. Consultant shall, immediately upon the receipt of the notice to re- assign staff from City, reassign such person or persons.

1.13 Independent Contractor.

A. Consultant is an independent contractor and not an employee of City.

Consultant shall have no power to incur any debt, obligation, or liability on behalf of City. All Services provided pursuant to this Agreement shall be performed by Consultant or under its superv1s1on. Consultant will determine the means, methods, and details of performing the Services. Any additional personnel performing Services under this Agreement on behalf of Consultant shall also not be employees of City and shall at all times be under Consultant' s exclusive direction and control. Consultant shall pay all wages, salaries, and other amounts due such personnel in connection with their performance of Services under this Agreement and as required by law. Consultant shall be responsible for all reports and obligations respecting such additional personnel, including, but not limited to: social security taxes, income tax withholding, unemployment insurance, disability insurance, and workers' compensation insurance.

B. Consultant shall indemnify and hold harmless City and its elected officials, officers, employees, servants, designated volunteers, and agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials, from any and all liability, damages, claims, costs and expenses of any nature to the extent arising from Consultant' s personnel practices. City shall have the right to offset against the amount of any fees due to Consultant under this Agreement any amount due to City from Consultant as a result of Consultant' s failure to promptly pay to City any reimbursement or indemnification arising under this Section.

1.14 Prohibition Against Subcontracting or Assignment.

The experience, knowledge, capability and reputation of Consultant, the Consultant Representative and employees were a substantial inducement for City to enter into this Agreement.

Therefore, Consultant shall not contract with any other entity to perform in whole or in part the Services required hereunder without the express written approval of City. In addition, neither this Agreement nor any interest herein may be transferred, assigned, conveyed, hypothecated or encumbered voluntarily or by operation of law, whether for the benefit of creditors or otherwise, without the prior written approval of City. Transfers restricted hereunder shall include the transfer to any person or group of persons acting in concert of more than twenty- five percent ( 25%) of the present ownership and/ or control of Consultant, taking all transfers into account on a cumulative basis. In the event of any such unapproved transfer, including any bankruptcy proceeding, this 5-
11303- 0008\ 2465263v1. doc
186
Agreement shall be void. No approved transfer shall release Consultant or any surety of Consultant of any liability hereunder without the express consent of City.

ARTICLE 2. COMPENSATION AND METHOD OF PAYMENT.

2.1 Contract Sum.

Subject to any limitations set forth in this Agreement, as full compensation for Services satisfactorily rendered, City shall pay Consultant at the hourly rates set forth in Exhibit C-1 and the not- to-exceed sub- budget total set forth in the " Schedule of Compensation" attached hereto as Exhibit C and incorporated herein by this reference. In no event shall Consultant be paid more than Five Hundred Forty- Seven Thousand Two Hundred Ninety Dollars ($ 547, 290. 00) ( the Contract Sum"). The Contract Sum shall include the attendance of Consultant at all project meetings reasonably deemed necessary by City. Coordination of the performance of the Services with City is a critical component of the Services. If Consultant is required to attend additional meetings to facilitate such coordination, Consultant shall not be entitled to any additional compensation for attending those meetings.

2.2 Method of Compensation.

The method of compensation may include: ( i) a lump sum payment upon completion of the Services, ( ii) payment in accordance with specified tasks or the percentage of completion of the Services, ( iii) payment for time and materials based upon Consultant' s rates as specified in the Schedule of Compensation, provided that time estimates are provided for the performance of sub tasks, but not exceeding the Contract Sum or (iv) such other methods as may be specified in the Schedule of Compensation.

2.3 Reimbursable Expenses.

City shall only reimburse Consultant for those actual and necessary expenses expressly set forth in Exhibit C. Reimbursable expenses may include reimbursement for actual and necessary expenditures for reproduction costs, telephone expenses, and travel expenses approved by the Contract Officer in advance, or actual sub- contractor expenses of an approved sub- contractor pursuant to Section 1.14, and only if specified in the Schedule of Compensation.

2.4 Unauthorized Services and Expenses.

City will not pay for any Services or reimburse for any expenses incurred which are not specified in the Scope of Services, unless authorized in writing as set forth in Section 1.8 of this Agreement. City shall make payment for such authorized additional Services and expenses in accordance with Article 2 of this Agreement.

2.5 Invoices.

Each month Consultant shall furnish to City an original invoice for all Services performed and expenses incurred during the preceding month. Each such invoice shall contain all of the information set forth in Section IV of Exhibit C to this Agreement. By submitting an invoice for payment under this Agreement, Consultant is certifying compliance with all provisions of the 6-
I 1303- 0008\ 2465263v I.doc
187
Agreement. Consultant shall not invoice City for any duplicate Services performed by more than one person.

City shall independently review each invoice submitted by Consultant to determine whether the Services performed and expenses incurred are in compliance with the provisions of this Agreement. City will use its best efforts to cause Consultant to be paid within thirty ( 30) days of receipt of Consultant' s correct and undisputed invoice, except as to any charges for Services performed or expenses incurred by Consultant which are disputed by City, or as provided in Section 6.3. In the event any charges or expenses are disputed by City, the original invoice shall be returned by City to Consultant for correction and resubmission. Review and payment by City of any invoice provided by Consultant shall not constitute waiver of any rights or remedies provided herein or any applicable law.

2.6 Waiver.

Payment to Consultant for Services performed pursuant to this Agreement shall not be deemed to waive any defects in Services performed by Consultant.

ARTICLE 3. PERFORMANCE SCHEDULE
3 .1 Time of Essence.

Time is of the essence in the performance of this Agreement; provided, however, that the foregoing shall not be construed to limit or deprive a Party of the benefits of any grace or use period allowed in this Agreement.

3.2 Schedule of Performance.

Consultant shall commence the Services pursuant to this Agreement upon receipt of a written notice to proceed and shall perform all Services within the time period( s) established in the " Schedule of Performance" attached hereto as Exhibit D and incorporated herein by this reference.

3.3 Force Majeure.

The time period( s) specified in the Schedule of Performance for performance of the Services rendered pursuant to this Agreement may be extended because of any delays due to unforeseeable causes beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of Consultant. Such unforeseeable consequences include, but are not restricted to, acts of God or public enemy, unusually severe weather, fires, earthquakes, floods, epidemics, quarantine restrictions, riots, strikes, freight embargoes, wars, litigation, and/ or acts of any governmental agency, including City, if Consultant shall within ten ( 10) days of the commencement of such delay notify the Contract Officer in writing of the causes of the delay. The Contract Officer shall ascertain the facts and the extent of delay, and extend the time for performing the Services for the period of the enforced delay when and if in the judgment of the Contract Officer such delay is justified, subject to the provisions of Section 1.8. The Contract Officer' s determination ( or the City Council' s determination, in the event the period of enforced delay exceeds the period specified in Section

1.8) shall be final and conclusive upon the Parties to this Agreement. In no event shall Consultant 7-
11303- 0008\ 2465263v I .doc
188
be entitled to recover damages against City for any delay in the performance of this Agreement, however caused; Consultant' s sole remedy shall be the extension of the Agreement pursuant to this Section.

3.4 Term.

The Term of this Agreement shall be from the Effective Date through June 30, 2025, with no option to extend the Agreement, unless sooner terminated as provided in Article 6 of this Agreement or extended as provided in Sections 1.8 and 3.3 of this Agreement.

ARTICLE 4. INSURANCE AND INDEMNIFICATION

4.1 Minimum Scope and Limits of Insurance.

Consultant shall procure and at all times during the term of this Agreement carry, maintain, and keep in full force and effect, insurance as follows:

A. Commercial General Liability Insurance with a mm1mum limit of 1,000, 000. 00 per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage and a general aggregate limit of $2,000, 000.00 per project or location. If Consultant is a limited liability company, the commercial general liability coverage shall be amended so that Consultant and its managers, members, affiliates, employees, agents and other persons necessary or incidental to its operation are insureds.

B. Automobile Liability Insurance for any owned, non- owned or hired vehicle used in connection with the performance of this Agreement with a combined single limit of 1,000, 000. 00 per accident for bodily injury and property damage. IfConsultant does not use any owned, non- owned or hired vehicles in the performance of Services under this Agreement, Consultant shall obtain a non- owned auto endorsement to the Commercial General Liability policy.

C. Workers' Compensation Insurance as required by the State of California and Employer' s Liability Insurance with a minimum limit of$1,000, 000. 00 per accident for bodily injury or disease. If Consultant has no employees while performing Services under this Agreement, workers' compensation policy is not required; however, Consultant shall execute a declaration that it has no employees.

D. Professional Liability/ Errors and Omissions Insurance with minimum limits of$1,000, 000. 00 per claim and in the aggregate.

4.2 Acceptability of Insurers.

The insurance policies required under this Article shall be issued by an insurer admitted to write insurance in the State of California with a rating of A: VII or better in the latest 8-
I 1303- 0008\ 2465263vl. doc
189
edition of the A.M. Best Insurance Rating Guide. Self- insurance shall not be considered to comply with the insurance requirements under this Article.

4.3 Additional Insured.

The commercial general and automobile liability policies shall contain an endorsement naming City, its officers, employees, agents and volunteers as additional insureds.

4.4 Primary and Non- Contributing.

The insurance policies required under this Article shall apply on a primary noncontributing basis in relation to any other insurance or self- insurance available to City. Any insurance or self- insurance maintained by City, its officers, employees, agents or volunteers, shall be in excess of Consultant' s insurance and shall not contribute with it.

4.5 Consultant' s Waiver of Subrogation.

The insurance policies required under this Article shall not prohibit Consultant and Consultant' s employees, agents or sub- contractors from waiving the right of subrogation prior to a loss. Consultant hereby waives all rights of subrogation against City.

4.6 Deductibles and Self- Insured Retentions.

Any deductibles or self- insured retentions must be declared to and approved by City. At City' s option, Consultant shall either reduce or eliminate the deductibles or self- insured retentions with respect to City; or Consultant shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and expenses.

4.7 Cancellations or Modifications to Coverage.

Consultant shall not cancel, reduce or otherwise modify the insurance policies required by this Article during the term of this Agreement. The commercial general and automobile liability policies required under this Agreement shall be endorsed to state that should the issuing insurer cancel the policy before the expiration date, the issuing insurer will endeavor to mail 30 days' prior written notice to City. If any insurance policy required under this Article is canceled or reduced in coverage or limits, Consultant shall, within two ( 2) Business Days ( as defined in Section 8. 12) of notice from the insurer, phone, fax or notify City via certified mail, return receipt requested, of the cancellation of or changes to the policy.

4.8 City Remedy for Noncompliance.

If Consultant does not maintain the policies of insurance required under this Article in full force and effect during the term of this Agreement, or in the event any of Consultant' s policies do not comply with the requirements under this Article, City may either immediately terminate this Agreement or, if insurance is available at a reasonable cost, City may, but has no duty to, take out the necessary insurance and pay, at Consultant' s expense, the premium thereon.

Consultant shall promptly reimburse City for any premium paid by City, or City may withhold amounts sufficient to pay the premiums from payments due to Consultant. 9-
l1303-0008\2465263v I.doc
190

4.9 Evidence of Insurance.

Prior to the performance of Services under this Agreement, Consultant shall furnish the City Clerk with a certificate or certificates of insurance and all original endorsements evidencing and effecting the coverages required under this Article. The endorsements are subject to City' s approval. Consultant may provide complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies to City. Consultant shall maintain current endorsements on file with the City Clerk.

Consultant shall provide proof to the City Clerk that insurance policies expiring during the term of this Agreement have been renewed or replaced with other policies providing at least the same coverage. Consultant shall furnish such proof at least two ( 2) weeks prior to the expiration of the coverages.

4.10 Indemnity Requirements not Limiting.

Procurement of insurance by Consultant shall not be construed as a limitation of Consultant' s liability or as full performance of Consultant' s duty to indemnify City under this Agreement.

4.11 Sub- contractor Insurance Requirements.

Consultant shall require each of its sub- contractors that perform Services under this Agreement to maintain insurance coverage that meets all of the requirements of this Article.

4.12 Indemnification, Hold Harmless, and Duty to Defend.

A. Indemnification of City.

I) Indemnity for Design Professional Services. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Consultant shall, at its sole cost and expense, protect, indemnify, and hold harmless City and its elected officials, officers, attorneys, agents, employees, designated volunteers, successors, assigns and those City agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials collectively " Indemnitees"), from and against any and all damages, costs, expenses, liabilities, claims, demands, causes of action, proceedings, judgments, penalties, liens, and losses of any nature whatsoever, including fees of accountants, attorneys, or other professionals and all costs associated therewith, and reimbursement of attorney' s fees and costs of defense ( collectively Liabilities"), whether actual, alleged or threatened, which arise out of, are claimed to arise out of, pertain to, or relate to, in whole or in part, the negligence, recklessness or willful misconduct of Consultant, its officers, agents, servants, employees, subcontractors, material men, contractors or their officers, agents, servants or employees ( or any entity or individual that Consultant shall bear the legal liability thereof) in the performance of design professional services under this Agreement by a " design professional," as the term is defined under California Civil Code Section 2782. S( c). 2) Other Indemnities. Other than in the performance of design professional services, and to the fullest extent permitted by law, Consultant shall, at its sole cost and expense, defend, hold harmless and indemnify Indemnitees from and against any and all damages, costs, expenses, liabilities, claims, demands, causes of action, proceedings, expenses, judgments, penalties, liens, and losses of any nature whatsoever, including fees of accountants, attorneys, or other professionals and all costs associated therewith and the payment of all consequential 10-
l l303- 0008\ 2465263v I .doc
191
damages ( collectively " Claims"), at law or in equity, whether actual, alleged or threatened, which arise out of, are claimed to arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the acts or omissions of Consultant, its officers, agents, servants, employees, sub- contractors, materialmen, consultants or their officers, agents, servants or employees ( or any entity or individual that Consultant shall bear the legal liability thereof) in the performance of this Agreement, including the Indemnitees' active or passive negligence, except for Claims arising from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the Indemnitees as determined by court decision or by the agreement of the Parties. Consultant shall defend the Indemnitees in any action or actions filed in connection with any Claims with counsel of the Indemnitees' choice, and shall pay all costs and expenses, including all attorneys' fees and experts' costs actually incurred in connection with such defense. Consultant shall reimburse the Indemnitees for any and all legal expenses and costs incurred by Indemnitees in connection therewith.
3) Consultant shall pay all required taxes on amounts paid to Consultant under this Agreement, and indemnify and hold City harmless from any and all taxes, assessments, penalties, and interest asserted against City by reason of the independent contractor relationship created by this Agreement. Consultant shall fully comply with the workers' compensation law regarding Consultant and Consultant' s employees. Consultant shall indemnify and hold City harmless from any failure of Consultant to comply with applicable workers' compensation laws.

City may offset against the amount of any fees due to Consultant under this Agreement any amount due to City from Consultant as a result of Consultant' s failure to promptly pay to City any reimbursement or indemnification arising under this subparagraph A.3. 4) Consultant shall obtain executed indemnity agreements with provisions identical to those in this Article from each and every sub- contractor or any other person or entity involved by, for, with or on behalf of Consultant in the performance of this Agreement. If Consultant fails to obtain such indemnities, Consultant shall be fully responsible and indemnify, hold harmless and defend the Indemnitees from and against any and all Liabilities and Claims, in law or in equity, whether actual, alleged or threatened, which arise out of, are claimed to arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the acts or omissions of Consultant' s sub- contractor, its officers, agents, servants, employees, sub- contractors, materialmen, contractors or their officers, agents, servants or employees ( or any entity or individual that Consultant' s sub- contractor shall bear the legal liability thereof) in the performance of this Agreement, including the Indemnitees' active or passive negligence, except for Liabilities and Claims arising from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the Indemnitees, as determined by court decision or by the agreement of the Parties.

B. Workers' Compensation Acts not Limiting. Consultant' s indemnifications and obligations under this Article, or any other provision of this Agreement, shall not be limited by the provisions of any workers' compensation act or similar act. Consultant expressly waives its statutory immunity under such statutes or laws as to City, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers.

C. Insurance Requirements not Limiting. City does not, and shall not, waive any rights that it may possess against Consultant because of the acceptance by City, or the deposit with City, of any insurance policy or certificate required pursuant to this Agreement. The indemnities in this Article shall apply regardless of whether or not any insurance policies are determined to be applicable to the Liabilities, tax, assessment, penalty or interest asserted against City. 11-
11303-0008\2465263v I.doc
192
D. Survival of Terms. Consultant' s indemnifications and obligations under this Article shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement.

ARTICLE 5. RECORDS, REPORTS, AND RELEASE OF INFORMATION

5. I Service Records.

Consultant shall keep, and require sub- contractors to keep, such ledgers, books ofaccounts, invoices, vouchers, canceled checks, reports, studies or other documents relating to the disbursements charged to City and Services performed hereunder ( the " Service Records"), as shall be necessary to perform the Services required by this Agreement and enable the Contract Officer to evaluate the performance of such Services. Any and all such Service Records shall be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be complete and detailed. The Contract Officer shall have full and free access to such Service Records at all times during normal business hours of City, including the right to inspect, copy, audit and make copies and transcripts from such Service Records. Such Service Records shall be maintained for a period of three ( 3) years following completion of the Services hereunder, and City shall have access to such Service Records in the event any audit is required. In the event of dissolution of Consultant' s business, custody of the Service Records may be given to City, and access shall be provided by Consultant' s successor in interest (" Consultant' s Successor"). If custody of the Service Records is given to Consultant' s Successor, Consultant shall give written notice to City of the transfer of the Service Records to Consultant' s Successor. The notice shall include contact information address and telephone number) for Consultant' s Successor, and access shall be provided to City by Consultant' s Successor.

5.2 Reports.

Consultant shall periodically prepare and submit to the Contract Officer such reports concerning the performance of the Services required by this Agreement as the Contract Officer shall require. Consultant hereby acknowledges that City is greatly concerned about the cost of Services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement. For this reason, Consultant agrees that if Consultant becomes aware of any facts, circumstances, techniques, or events that may or will materially increase or decrease the cost of the Services contemplated herein, Consultant shall promptly notify the Contract Officer of that fact, circumstance, technique or event and the estimated increased or decreased cost related thereto.

5.3 Ownership of Documents.

All drawings, specifications, maps, designs, photographs, studies, surveys, data, notes, computer files, reports, records, documents and other materials ( the " Consultant Documents") prepared by Consultant, its employees, sub- contractors and agents in the performance of this Agreement shall be the property of City and shall be delivered to City upon request of the Contract Officer or upon the termination of this Agreement. Consultant shall have no claim for further employment or additional compensation as a result of the exercise by City of its full rights of ownership use, reuse, or assignment of the Consultant Documents hereunder. Any use, reuse or assignment of such completed Consultant Documents for other projects and/ or use of uncompleted Consultant Documents without specific written authorization by Consultant will be at City' s sole 12-
I I303- 0008\ 2465263v I.doc
193
risk and without liability to Consultant, and Consultant' s guarantee and warranties shall not extend to such use or assignment. Consultant may retain copies of such Consultant Documents for its own use. Consultant shall have an unrestricted right to use the concepts embodied therein. All sub- contractors shall provide for assignment to City of all Consultant Documents prepared by them; and in the event Consultant fails to secure such assignment, Consultant shall indemnify City for all damages resulting therefrom.

5.4 Confidentiality and Release of Information.

A. All information gained or work product produced by Consultant in performance of this Agreement shall be considered confidential, unless such information is in the public domain or already known to Consultant. Consultant shall not release or disclose any such information or work product to persons or entities other than City without prior written authorization from the Contract Officer.

8. Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or sub- contractors, shall not, without prior written authorization from the Contract Officer or unless requested by the City Attorney, voluntarily provide documents, declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories or other information concerning the Services performed under this Agreement. Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered " voluntary" provided Consultant gives City notice of such court order or subpoena.

C. If Consultant, or any officer, employee, agent or sub- contractor of Consultant, provides any information or work product in violation of this Agreement, then City shall have the right to reimbursement and indemnity from Consultant for any damages, costs and fees, including attorneys' fees, caused by or incurred as a result of Consultant' s conduct.

D. Consultant shall promptly notify City should Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or sub- contractors be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice of deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, request for admissions or other discovery request, court order or subpoena from any Party regarding this Agreement and the Services performed thereunder. City retains the right, but has no obligation, to represent Consultant or be present at any deposition, hearing or similar proceeding. Consultant agrees to cooperate fully with City and to provide City with the opportunity to review any response to discovery requests provided by Consultant. However, this right to review any such response does not imply or mean the right by City to control, direct, or rewrite the response.

ARTICLE 6. ENFORCEMENT OF AGREEMENT AND TERMINATION

6.1 California Law.

This Agreement, and any dispute arising from the relationship between the Parties to this Agreement, shall be interpreted, construed and governed both as to validity and to performance of the Parties in accordance with the laws of the State of California. Legal actions concerning any dispute, claim or matter arising out of or in relation to this Agreement shall be instituted in the Superior Court of the County of Riverside, State of California, or any other appropriate court in such county, and Consultant covenants and agrees to submit to the personal jurisdiction of such 13-
11303-0008\2465263v I.doc
194
court in the event of such action. In the event of litigation in a U.S. District Court, venue shall lie exclusively in the Central District of California, in Riverside.

6.2 Disputes; Default.

A. In the event that City determines Consultant is in default under the terms of this Agreement, City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any Services performed after the date of default. In addition to the provisions of Section 4.8, and the right to terminate pursuant to Section 6. 7, if the City Manager determines that Consultant is in default in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, City may serve Consultant with written notice of the default. Consultant shall have ten ( I 0) calendar days after service upon it of the notice in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance.

In the event that Consultant fails to cure its default within such period of time, City may, notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, terminate this Agreement without further notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity or under this Agreement.

B. In the event of termination pursuant to this Section, City may take over the Services and prosecute the same to completion by contract or otherwise, and Consultant shall be liable to the extent that the total cost for completion of the Services required hereunder exceeds the compensation herein stipulated ( provided that City shall use reasonable efforts to mitigate such damages), and City may withhold any payments to Consultant for the purpose of set- off or partial payment of the amounts owed City as provided in Section 6.3.

6.3 Retention of Funds.

Consultant hereby authorizes City to deduct from any amount payable to Consultant whether or not arising out of this Agreement): ( i) any payment amount of which may be in dispute hereunder or which is necessary to compensate City for any losses, costs, liabilities, or damages suffered by City, (ii) all amounts retained pursuant to the provisions of Section 4.8, (iii) all amounts for which City may be liable to third parties, by reason of Consultant' s acts or omissions in performing or failing to perform Consultant' s obligation under this Agreement, and ( iv) all payments due or that become due to Consultant during the period that Consultant or any of its sub- contractors fail to maintain any required insurance in full force and effect, until notice is received by City that the required insurance has been restored to full force and effect and that the premiums therefore have been paid for a period satisfactory to City, as provided in Section 4.9, above. In the event that any claim is made by a third party, the amount or validity of which is disputed by Consultant, or any indebtedness shall exist which shall appear to be the basis for a claim of lien, City may withhold from any payment due, without liability for interest because of such withholding, an amount sufficient to cover such claim. The failure of City to exercise such right to deduct or to withhold shall not, however, affect the obligations of Consultant to insure, indemnify, and protect City as elsewhere provided herein.

6.4 Waiver.

Waiver by any Party to this Agreement of any term, condition, or covenant of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other term, condition, or covenant. Waiver by any 14-
l l303- 0008\ 2465263v I.doc
195
Party of any breach of the provisions of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other provision or a waiver of any subsequent breach or violation of any provision of this Agreement.

Acceptance by City of any Services by Consultant shall not constitute a waiver of any of the provisions of this Agreement. No delay or omission in the exercise of any right or remedy by a non- defaulting Party on any default shall impair such right or remedy or be construed as a waiver.

Any waiver by either Party of any default must be in writing, and shall not be a waiver of any other default concerning the same or any other provision of this Agreement.

6.5 Rights and Remedies are Cumulative.

Except with respect to rights and remedies expressly declared to be exclusive in this Agreement, the rights and remedies of the Parties are cumulative and the exercise by either Party of one or more of such rights or remedies shall not preclude the exercise by it, at the same or different times, of any other rights or remedies for the same default or any other default by the other Party.

6.6 Legal Action.

In addition to any other rights or remedies, either Party may take legal action, in law or in equity, to cure, correct or remedy any default, to recover damages for any default, to compel specific performance of this Agreement, to obtain declaratory or injunctive relief, or to obtain any other remedy consistent with the purposes of this Agreement. Notwithstanding any contrary provision herein, Consultant must file a statutory claim pursuant to Government Code Sections 905 et seq. and 910 et seq., in order to pursue a legal action against City under this Agreement.

6.7 Termination Prior to Expiration of Term.

This Article 6 shall govern any termination of this Agreement except as specifically provided in Section 6.2 for termination for default of Consultant. City reserves the right to terminate this Agreement at any time, with or without cause, upon thirty ( 30) days' written notice to Consultant, except that where termination is due to the fault of Consultant, the period of notice may be a shorter time as may be determined by the Contract Officer. In addition, Consultant reserves the right to terminate this Agreement at any time, with or without cause, upon sixty ( 60) days' written notice to City, except that where termination is due to the fault of City, the period of notice may be a shorter time as Consultant may determine. Upon receipt of any notice of termination, Consultant shall immediately cease all Services hereunder except such as may be specifically approved by the Contract Officer. Except where Consultant has initiated termination, Consultant shall be entitled to compensation for all Services rendered prior to the effective date of the notice of termination and for any Services authorized by the Contract Officer thereafter in accordance with the Schedule of Compensation or such as may be approved by the Contract Officer, except as provided in Section 6.3. In the event Consultant has initiated termination, Consultant shall be entitled to compensation only for the reasonable value of the work product actually produced hereunder. In the event of termination without cause pursuant to this Section, the terminating Party need not provide the non- terminating Party with the opportunity to cure pursuant to Section 6.2.
15-
1I303- 0008\ 2465263v I.doc
196

6.8 Attorneys' Fees.

In any litigation or other proceeding by which a Party seeks to enforce its rights under this Agreement ( whether in contract, tort or both) or seeks a declaration of any rights or obligations under this Agreement, the prevailing Party in such action or proceeding, in addition to any other relief which may be granted, whether legal or equitable, shall be entitled to reasonable attorneys' fees. Attorneys' fees shall include attorney' s fees on any appeal, and in addition the Party entitled to attorneys' fees shall be entitled to all other reasonable costs for investigating such action, taking depositions and discovery and all other necessary costs the court allows which are incurred in such litigation. All such fees shall be deemed to have accrued on commencement of such action and shall be enforceable whether or not such action is prosecuted to judgment.

ARTICLE 7. CITY OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES: NON- DISCRIMINATION 7 .1 Non- liability of City Officers and Employees.

No officer or employee of City shall be personally liable to Consultant, or Consultant' s Successor, in the event of any default or breach by City or for any amount which may become due to Consultant or Consultant' s Successor, or for breach of any obligation of the terms of this Agreement.

7.2 Conflict of Interest.

Consultant covenants that neither it, nor any officer or principal of its firm, has or shall acquire any interest, directly or indirectly, which would conflict in any manner with the interests of City or which would in any way hinder Consultant' s performance of Services under this Agreement. Consultant further covenants that in the performance of this Agreement, no person having any such interest shall be employed by it as an officer, employee, agent or sub- contractor without the express written consent of the Contract Officer. Consultant agrees to at all times avoid conflicts of interest or the appearance of any conflicts of interest with the interests of City in the performance of this Agreement.

No officer or employee of City shall have any direct or indirect financial interest in this Agreement within the scope of Government Code section 1090, nor shall any such officer or employee make, participate in making, or use his or her official position to influence, any City decision relating to the Agreement which has a material financial effect on his or her financial interests or the financial interests of any corporation, partnership or association in which he or she is, directly or indirectly, interested, in violation of any State statute or regulation. Consultant warrants that it has not paid or given, and will not pay or give any third party any money or other consideration for obtaining this Agreement.

Consultant and its officers, employees, associates and sub- contractors, ifany, shall comply with all conflict of interest statutes of the State of California applicable to Consultant' s Services under this Agreement, including the Political Reform Act ( Gov. Code § 81000, et seq.) and Government Code Section 1090. During the term of this Agreement, Consultant may perform similar services for other clients; but Consultant and its officers, employees, associates and subcontractors shall not, without the Contract Officer' s prior written approval, perform services for another person or entity for whom Consultant is not currently performing services that would 16-
l l303- 000812465263v I.doc
197
require Consultant or one of its officers, employees, associates or sub- contractors to abstain from a decision under this Agreement pursuant to a conflict of interest statute. Consultant shall incorporate a clause substantially similar to this Section into any subcontract that Consultant executes in connection with the performance of this Agreement.

7.3 Covenant Against Discrimination.

Consultant covenants that, by and for itself, its heirs, executors, assigns, and all persons claiming under or through them, that there shall be no discrimination against or segregation of, any person or group of persons on account of race, color, creed, religion, sex, gender, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, or ancestry in the performance of this Agreement.

Consultant shall take affirmative action to insure that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment, without regard to their race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, national origin, or ancestry, or other protected class.

7.4 Unauthorized Aliens.

Consultant hereby promises and agrees to comply with all of the provisions of the Federal Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C.A. §§ 1101, et seq., as amended, and in connection therewith, shall not employ unauthorized aliens as defined therein. Should Consultant so employ such unauthorized aliens for the performance of Services covered by this Agreement, and should the any liability or sanctions be imposed against City for such use of unauthorized aliens, Consultant hereby agrees to and shall reimburse City for the cost of all such liabilities or sanctions imposed, together with any and all costs, including attorneys' fees, incurred by City.

ARTICLE 8. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS

8.1 Notices.

Any notice, demand, request, document, consent, approval, bill, invoice, report or other communication required or permitted under this Agreement shall be in writing and conclusively deemed effective: ( a) on confirmed delivery by courier service or overnight delivery service during Consultant' s and City' s regular business hours; or (b) three ( 3) Business Days after deposit in the United States mail, by certified or registered mail, and addressed to the Party to be notified as set forth below:

Ifto City
I 1303- 0008\ 2465263v I.doc
Attn: Brandon Robinson
Electrical Engineering Supervisor
City of Banning
176 East Lincoln Street
Banning, California 92220
Email: brobinson@banningca. gov
17-
198
With a courtesy copy to:

Ifto Consultant:

8.2 Interpretation.

Serita Young, City Attorney
Richards, Watson & Gershon
350 South Grand Avenue, 37th Floor
Los Angeles, California 90071
Email: syoung@rwglaw. com
Attn: Chad Shaules
Chief Executive Officer
Cornerstone Development Company
17615 Alder Street, Suite A
Hesperia, CA 92345
Email: chad@cornerstone. dev
The terms of this Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the meaning of the language used and shall not be construed for or against either Party by reason of the authorship of this Agreement or any other rule of construction which might otherwise apply.

8.3 Counterparts.

This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, and such counterparts shall constitute one and the same instrument.

8.4 Integration; Amendment.

This Agreement, and all exhibits referred to in this Agreement, constitute the final, complete and exclusive statement of the terms of the agreement between the Parties pertaining to the subject matter of this Agreement and supersede all other and cancels any and all previous negotiations, arrangements, agreements and understandings, if any, between the Parties, and none shall be used to interpret this Agreement. No Party has been induced to enter into this Agreement by, nor is any Party relying on, any representation or warranty except those expressly set forth in this Agreement. No amendment to or modification of this Agreement, nor any provision or breach hereof waived, shall be valid unless made in writing and approved by Consultant and by City Council. The Parties agree that this requirement for written modifications cannot be waived and that any attempted waiver shall be void.

8.5 Severability.

In the event that any one or more of the phrases, sentences, clauses, paragraphs, or sections contained in this Agreement shall be declared invalid or unenforceable by a valid judgment or decree of a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unenforceability shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, sentences, clauses, paragraphs, or sections of this Agreement which are hereby declared as severable and shall be interpreted to carry out the intent of the Parties hereunder unless the invalid provision is so material that its invalidity deprives either Party of the basic benefit of their bargain or renders this Agreement meaningless. 18-
I 1303- 0008\ 2465263v I.doc
199

8.6 Mutual Cooperation.

A. City' s Cooperation. City shall provide Consultant with all pertinent data, documents and other requested information as is reasonably available for Consultant' s proper performance of the Services required under this Agreement.

B. Consultant' s Cooperation. In the event any claim or action is brought against City relating to Consultant' s performance of Services rendered under this Agreement, Consultant shall render any reasonable assistance that City requires.

8. 7 No Third Party Beneficiaries Intended.

This Agreement is made solely for the benefit of the Parties to this Agreement and their respective successors and assigns, and no other person or entity may have or acquire a right by virtue of this Agreement.

8.8 Final Payment Acceptance Constitutes Release.

The acceptance by Consultant of the final payment made under this Agreement shall operate as and be a release of City from all claims and liabilities for compensation to Consultant for anything done, furnished or relating to Consultant' s Services. Acceptance of payment shall be any negotiation of City' s check or the failure to make a written extra compensation claim within ten ( 10) calendar days of the receipt of that check. However, approval or payment by City shall not constitute, nor be deemed, a release of the responsibility and liability of Consultant, its employees, sub- contractors and agents for the accuracy and competency of the information provided and/ or Services performed; nor shall such approval or payment be deemed to be an assumption of such responsibility or liability by City for any defect or error in the Services prepared by Consultant, its employees, sub- contractors and agents.

8.9 Non- Appropriation of Funds.

Payments to be made to Consultant by City for Services performed within the current fiscal year which are within the current fiscal budget and within an available, unexhausted fund. In the event that City does not appropriate sufficient funds for payment of Consultant' s Services beyond the current fiscal year, this Agreement shall cover payment for Consultant' s Services only to the conclusion of the last fiscal year in which City appropriates sufficient funds and shall automatically terminate at the conclusion of such fiscal year.

8.10 Headings.

The headings in this Agreement are included solely for convenience of reference and shall not affect the interpretation of any provision of this Agreement or any of the rights or obligations of the Parties to this Agreement.
19-
l 1303- 000812465263v I.doc
200

8.11 Word Usage.

Unless the context clearly requires otherwise, ( a) the words " shall," " will" and agrees" are mandatory and " may" is permissive; ( b) " or" is not exclusive; and ( c) " includes" or including" are not limiting.

8.12 Business Days.

Business Days" refers to days that the Banning City Hall is open for business.

8.13 Corporate Authority.

The persons executing this Agreement on behalf of the Parties hereto warrant that i): such Party is duly organized and existing, ( ii) they are duly authorized to execute and deliver this Agreement on behalf of that Party, ( iii) by so executing this Agreement, such Party is formally bound to the provisions of this Agreement, and ( iv) the entering into this Agreement does not violate any provision of any other Agreement to which that Party is bound. This Agreement shall be binding upon the heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of the Parties.

8.14 Electronic Signatures.

Each Party may adopt as its signature an electronic identification consisting of a symbol or code that is affixed to or contained in each document transmitted by such Party electronic signature"). The Parties hereto herby agree that electronic signatures are acceptable, shall have the same force and effect under the law as original wet signatures, and shall be sufficient to verify that the Parties have executed this Agreement and such other documents transmitted by the Parties.

SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE]
20-
11303-0008\2465263v I.doc
201
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the Parties hereto have executed this Agreement the day and year first hereinabove written.

CITY OF BANNING
Douglas Schulze,
City Manager
ATTEST:

Sonja De La Fuente
Deputy City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Richards, Watson & Gershon
Serita Young.,
City Attorney
Date
Date
Date

CONSULTANT
NAME: Date
TITLE:

NAME: Date
TITLE:

Tax ID No.

Address:

City Council Approval: _____ _
NOTE: PROOF OF AUTHORITY TO BIND CONTRACTING PARTY REQUIRED. APPROPRIATE

ATTESTATIONS SHALL BE INCLUDED AS MAY BE REQUIRED BY THE BYLAWS, ARTICLES OF

INCORPORATION, OR OTHER RULES OR REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO CONSULTANT' S BUSINESS ENTITY.
21-
I l303- 000812465263v I.doc
202
EXHIBIT " A"

SCOPE OF SERVICES
I. Consultant will perform the following Services in connection with providing engineering services for the electric utility department prepared in connection therewith:

II. As part ofthe Services, Consultant will prepare and deliver the following tangible work products and services to City:

The Utility requires various upgrades to the existing primary and secondary distribution systems including, but not limited, to the replacement, rebuilding and upgrading of overhead and underground circuits. The Consultant will provide as- needed services on a task order basis including engineering and design, environmental review and permitting, project management, procurement of materials and equipment, construction management and other related services in support of the Utility' s electrical capital improvement program.

Engineering, Design and Environmental Services
To prepare job packages, the Consultant will conduct field investigations and prepare calculations, design drawings, construction and material standards, construction specifications, material and equipment specifications, cost estimates, and project schedules as may be required to define the work for completion by either the Utility or a Contractor hired by the Utility. The Consultant may be required to provide environmental review, geotechnical studies and surveying to complete the work. It is important that the Consultant has a California licensed P .E. on staff or available to the Consultant. These services may be provided by the Consultant or its subcontractors.

Ifthe Utility elects to have construction work completed by Contractors, at the Utility' s discretion, the Consultant will assist with preparation of bid packages, review of contractor bids, and will provide construction support services. Bid packages will include specifications and drawings, contract documents and other required bidding documents to conform to the Utility' s procurement requirements.

Project Management Services
Project management services will include the development of project scopes, schedules and budgets, maintenance and updating of schedules and budgets, conducting periodic project review meetings, and preparing project progress reports. The Consultant will provide weekly progress reports of approved projects. Progress reports will be in the form of updated project schedules, along with any narrative required to explain problems, corrective actions or proposed changes to the approved schedules and estimates. Progress reports shall be e- mailed to the Utility' s assigned Project Manager bi-weekly or as directed.

Exhibit " A"-1
203
The Consultant will provide the Utility with a monthly report that briefly describes the status of all Contract tasks. All invoices billing to a Task will be submitted to the Utility within 90 days of Task closing date.

Procurement Support Services
The Consultant will assist the Utility with the procurement of materials and equipment needed to complete the projects. Materials and equipment could include wood and steel poles, cross arms, insulators, conductor, cable, splices and terminations, overhead and underground switches, pad- mounted and pole- mounted distribution transformers, cut- outs, substation transformers, circuit breakers, switchgear, protection, control and communications equipment and other equipment as may be needed to complete the work. The Consultant will provide all standards and specifications for equipment and materials that comply with all applicable standards and practices typical of electric municipal utilities in southern California. All design and construction shall conform to the latest version of California Public Utilities General Orders 95 and 128 for overhead and underground electric facilities, respectively. The City does not maintain its own standards for materials, equipment or construction.

The Consultant will assist with the preparation of material and equipment bid packages that conform to the Utility' s procurement requirements, review bids, assist with the recommendation of award, review and approve supplier requests for information and submittals, inspect materials and equipment when delivered and assist the Utility with management of materials and equipment for use by Utility and contractor crews.

Construction Support Services
Construction support services will include the preparation and updating of project schedules and completion- cost estimates, conducting weekly on- site project review meetings with Utility and contractor representatives, preparation of meeting agendas and meeting minutes, preparation and maintenance of action items, review of contractor submittals, requests for information, change requests, and payment requests, and completion of as- built records and drawings. The Consultant will also conduct weekly site inspections of construction projects ( inspections will be performed after weekly on- site meetings, to reduce travel expense) and will work with the Utility and contractor to resolve issues that may arise during the course of construction.

III. In addition to the requirements of Parts I and II of this Scope of Services, during the performance of the Services, Consultant will keep City appraised through periodic status reports regarding the performance of the Services under this Agreement as set forth below and in Section 5.2, by the following means:
a. In-person meetings and/ or teleconferences.
b. Email updates/ questions to applicant team and City while reviews are underway.

Exhibit " A"- 2
204
c. Conference calls.

IV. All work product is subject to review and acceptance by City, and must be revised by Consultant without additional charge to City until found satisfactory and accepted by City.

Exhibit " A"- 3
205
EXHIBIT " B"

SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS

TERMS FOR COMPLIANCE WITH CALIFORNIA LABOR LAW REQUIREMENTS

1. This Agreement calls for services that, in whole or in part, constitute " public works" as defined in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter I ( commencing with Section 1720) of the California Labor Code (" Chapter l "). Further, Consultant acknowledges that this Agreement is subject to (a) Chapter l and ( b) the rules and regulations established by the Department of Industrial Relations DIR") implementing such statutes. Therefore, as to those Services that are " public works," Consultant shall comply with and be bound by all the terms, rules and regulations described in l(a) and 1 (b) as though set forth in full herein.

2. California law requires the inclusion of specific Labor Code provisions in certain contracts. The inclusion of such specific provisions below, whether or not required by California law, does not alter the meaning or scope of Section 1 above.

3. Consultant shall be registered with the Department of Industrial Relations in accordance with California Labor Code Section 1725. 5, and has provided proof of registration to City prior to the Effective Date of this Agreement. Consultant shall not perform work with any subcontractor that is not registered with DIR pursuant to Section 1725. 5. Consultant and subcontractors shall maintain their registration with the DIR in effect throughout the duration of this Agreement. Ifthe Consultant or any subcontractor ceases to be registered with DIR at any time during the duration of the project, Consultant shall immediately notify City.

4. Pursuant to Labor Code Section 1771. 4, Consultant' s Services are subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by DIR. Consultant shall post job site notices, as prescribed by DIR regulations.

5. Pursuant to Labor Code Section 1773 .2, copies of the prevailing rate of per diem wages for each craft, classification, or type of worker needed to perform the Agreement are on file at City Hall and will be made available to any interested party on request. Consultant acknowledges receipt of a copy of the DIR determination of such prevailing rate of per diem wages, and Consultant shall post such rates at each job site covered by this Agreement.

6. Consultant shall comply with and be bound by the provisions of Labor Code Sections 1774 and 1775 concerning the payment of prevailing rates of wages to workers and the penalties for failure to pay prevailing wages. The Consultant shall, as a penalty to City, forfeit 200. 00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each worker paid less than the prevailing rates as determined by the DIR for the work or craft in which the worker is employed for any public work done pursuant to this Agreement by Consultant or by any subcontractor.

7. Consultant shall comply with and be bound by the provisions of Labor Code Section 1776, which requires Consultant and each subcontractor to: keep accurate payroll records and verify such records in writing under penalty of perjury, as specified in Section 1776; certify and make such payroll records available for inspection as provided by Section 1776; and inform City of the location of the records.

Exhibit " B"-1
I I303- 0008\ 2465263v I.doc
206

8. Consultant shall comply with and be bound by the provisions of Labor Code Sections 1777. 5, 1777. 6 and 1777. 7 and California Administrative Code Title 8,. Section 200 et seq. concerning the employment of apprentices on public works projects. Consultant shall be responsible for compliance with these aforementioned Sections for all apprenticeable occupations.

Prior to commencing work under this Agreement, Consultant shall provide City with a copy of the information submitted to any applicable apprenticeship program. Within 60 days after concluding work pursuant to this Agreement, Consultant and each of its subcontractors shall submit to City a verified statement of the journeyman and apprentice hours performed under this Agreement.

9. The Consultant shall not perform Work with any Subcontractor that has been debarred or suspended pursuant to California Labor Code Section 1777. 1 or any other federal or state law providing for the debarment of contractors from public works. The Consultant and Subcontractors shall not be debarred or suspended throughout the duration of this Agreement pursuant to Labor Code Section 1777. 1 or any other federal or state law providing for the debarment of contractors from public works. If the Consultant or any subcontractor becomes debarred or suspended during the duration of the project, the Consultant shall immediately notify City.

10. Consultant acknowledges that eight hours labor constitutes a legal day' s work.

Consultant shall comply with and be bound by Labor Code Section 1810. Consultant shall comply with and be bound by the provisions of Labor Code Section 1813 concerning penalties for workers who work excess hours. The Consultant shall, as a penalty to City, forfeit $ 25.00 for each worker employed in the performance of this Agreement by the Consultant or by any subcontractor for each calendar day during which such worker is required or permitted to work more than eight hours in any one calendar day and 40 hours in any one calendar week in violation of the provisions of Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code. Pursuant to Labor Code section 1815, work performed by employees of Consultant in excess of eight hours per day, and 40 hours during any one week shall be permitted upon public work upon compensation for all hours worked in excess of eight hours per day at not less than one and one- half times the basic rate of pay.

11. California Labor Code Sections 1860 and 3700 provide that every employer will be required to secure the payment of compensation to its employees. In accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code Section 1861, Consultant hereby certifies as follows:

I am aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for workers' compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work of this contract."
Date ______ Signature ___________ _
Exhibit " B"- 2
I 1303- 0008\ 2465263v I.doc
207

12. For every subcontractor who will perform work on the project, Consultant shall be responsible for such subcontractor' s compliance with Chapter I and Labor Code Sections 1860 and 3700, and Consultant shall include in the written contract between it and each subcontractor a copy of those statutory provisions and a requirement that each subcontractor shall comply with those statutory provisions. Consultant shall be required to take all actions necessary to enforce such contractual provisions and ensure subcontractor' s compliance, including, without limitation, conducting a periodic review of the certified payroll records of the subcontractor and upon becoming aware of the failure of the subcontractor to pay his or her workers the specified prevailing rate of wages. Consultant shall diligently take corrective action to halt or rectify any failure.

Exhibit " B"- 3
I I303- 0008l2465263v I.doc
208
EXHIBIT " C"

SCHEDULE OF COMPENSATION
I. Consultant shall perform the following tasks (" Tasks") not to exceed the following rates listed in Cl- 1
II. Within the budgeted amounts for each Task, and with the approval of the Contract Officer, funds may be shifted from one Task sub- budget to another so long as the Contract Sum is not exceeded per Section 2.1, unless Additional Services are approved per Section 1.8.

III. City will compensate Consultant for the Services performed upon submission of a valid invoice. Each invoice is to include:

A. Line items for all personnel describing the Services performed, the number of hours worked, and the hourly rate.

B. Line items for all materials and equipment properly charged to the Services.

C. Line items for all other approved reimbursable expenses claimed, with supporting documentation.

D. Line items for all approved sub- contractor labor, supplies, equipment, materials, and travel properly charged to the Services.

IV. V. Consultant' s billing rates for all personnel are attached as Exhibit C-1.

Exhibit " C"- 1
I 1303- 0008\ 2465263vl . doc
209
EXHIBIT " C-1"

CONSULTANT' S BILLING RATE AND TASK SCHEDULE
General Staff Fee Sheet:

Senior Electrical Engineer $ 185. 00hr ( NT)
Senior Structural Engineer $ 250. 00hr ( NT)
Senior Planner $ 125. 00hr ( NT)
Associate Planner $ 75.00hr ( NT)
Senior Design Drafter $ 85.00hr ( NT)
Associate Design Drafter $ 65.00hr ( NT)
Travel Rate Fee Sheet: ( Paid out for projects/ meetings greater than 75 miles from our main office location)
Daily Per Diem $ 75 Per Day, Per Person
Hotel Fee $ 350 Per Night, Per Person
Millage Fee $ 0.85 cents per mile beyond 75 miles one way IT Usage Fees: Cornerstone proposes to include all computer, IT and specialty software SpidaCALC and AutoCAD) in our General Staff Fee Sheet.

Printing and Administrative Support Fee Sheet:

Administrative Assistant $ 55.00hr ( NT)

8.5" xl l" & 11 " xl 7" Color/ BW text prints $ 0.25 per page

8.5" x11" & 11 " xl 7" Color photo prints ( non- gloss) $ 0.50 per page 24" x36" Color/ 8W Map prints $ 2.50 per page
Telephone/ Online Meeting Fee Sheet: All required personnel shall be billed at 75% of their normal billing rate per the General Staff Fee Sheet.

Exhibit " C- 1"- l
210
EXIDBIT "D"

SCHEDULE OF PERFORMANCE
I. Consultant shall perform all Services timely, and deliver the specified tangible work products and services to City in accordance with agreed upon schedules.

II. The Contract Officer may approve extensions for performance of the Services in accordance with Sections 1.8 and 3.3.

Exhibit " D-1 " - 1
211

CITY OF BANNING

STAFF REPORT
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Elizabeth Gibbs, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Matt Weise, Building Official
Matthew Bassi, Acting Community Development Director
MEETING DATE: May 26, 2026
SUBJECT: City Initiated Code Amendment to add Section 15.12.055 to Chapter 15.12 of Title 15 (Building and Construction) Regarding Refunds RECOMMENDATION:

Introduce by title and waive further reading of Ordinance.

BACKGROUND:

The City enforces the State-adopted model building standards for the purpose of regulating the design, construction, and quality of structures in order to protect life, health, safety, and property. Within the administrative provisions of these codes, Section 109.6 of the California Building Code (CBC) authorizes the Building Official to establish policies governing the refund of building permit fees.

The proposed ordinance amends Title 15 of the Banning Municipal Code to provide clear and express authorization for the Building Official to administer and issue refunds associated with building permits, consistent with the California Building Code. For reference, the Building and Safety Division issues approximately 6–12 refunds annually to residents and contractors operating or residing within the City.

The value of these refunds is typically less than $500.00 per refund after staff costs are considered.

This amendment is intended to ensure transparency, consistency, and equitable treatment in the administration of permit fee refunds, while formally establishing the City’s policy that monetary refunds are only issued for the remaining balance of the permit fee collected once portions of staff services related to the administration, processing, plan review, or inspection of permit applications have been rendered.

JUSTIFICATION:

The California Building Code Section 109.6 authorizes the Building Official to establish a refund policy for building permit fees. Upon review of the existing Banning Municipal Code, staff has determined that it does not currently contain clear and concise provisions establishing a citywide building permit refund policy. The absence of a formally adopted policy creates the potential for inconsistent application of refunds, which may give rise to public perception of inequity, preferential treatment, or favoritism between industry professionals and owner-builder applicants. Such inconsistency undermines transparency and public trust in the permitting process. Accordingly, the establishment of a standardized refund policy is necessary to ensure that all applicants are treated in a fair, impartial, and uniform manner. This policy will provide clear guidance for the administration of refunds related to building 212
permits, regardless of an applicant’s level of experience, knowledge, or resources, and will promote consistency, accountability, and confidence in the City’s regulatory processes.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no direct fiscal impact related to adoption of the Ordinance. If a refund is requested, the payment will come out of the remaining balance of the building permit fees collected when the resident was issued a permit.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Refund_Policy_Ordinance_PAN_Final__1___2_3 (1).docx

2. 1kDAQmS91IYa94LRGzZC_1778519831638.pdf
213
Ordinance 1623

ORDINANCE 1623
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BANNING, CALIFORNIA, ADDING SECTION 15.12.055 TO CHAPTER 15.12 (PERMITS) OF TITLE 15 (BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION) OF THE

BANNING MUNICIPAL CODE TO AUTHORIZE THE BUILDING OFFICIAL TO ISSUE REFUNDS OF PERMIT FEES.

WHEREAS, pursuant to Article XI, Section 7 of the California Constitution, the City of Banning is authorized to adopt and enforce ordinances and regulations not in conflict with the general laws to protect the public health, safety, and welfare; and WHEREAS, the City of Banning is authorized to adopt and enforce building regulations pursuant to the California Building Code (CBC), as adopted and amended by the City; and
WHEREAS, Chapter 15.12 of Title 15 (Building and Construction) of the Banning Municipal Code regulates building permits within the City; and WHEREAS, the collection of building permit, plan review, and inspection fees is necessary to recover the City’s cost of providing such services; and WHEREAS, the City Council has independently reviewed and considered the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and finds that the proposed amendment is not subject to CEQA pursuant to Section 15060(c)(2) and (c)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines, as the amendment will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment and is not a “project” as defined in Section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines.

NOW THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BANNING, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. INCORPORATION OF RECITALS.

The recitals reflected above are true and correct and incorporated herein by this reference as the cause, purpose, and foundation for the action taken by the City Council through this Ordinance.

SECTION 2. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION.

The City Council finds that adoption of this Ordinance is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15060(c)(2) and (c)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines because the adoption of Ordinance will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment and is not a “project” as defined in Section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines
214
Ordinance 1623

SECTION 3. SEVERABILITY.

The City Council hereby declares that if any provision, section, paragraph, sentence, or word of this Ordinance is rendered or declared to be invalid or unconstitutional by any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction, or by reason of any preemptive legislation, such invalidity shall not affect the other provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences, or words of this Ordinance, and to this end the provisions of this Ordinance are severable. The City Council declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance irrespective of the invalidity of any particular portion thereof and intends that the invalid portions should be severed, and the balance of the Ordinance enforced.

SECTION 4. PROSECUTION OF PRIOR ORDINANCES.

Neither the adoption of this Ordinance nor the repeal of any other ordinance of this City shall in any manner affect the prosecution of any violation of any City ordinance or provision of the City of Beaumont Municipal Code, committed prior to the effective date hereof, nor be construed as a waiver of any penalty or the penal provisions applicable to any violation thereof.

SECTION 4. FINDINGS.

The City Council of the City of Banning finds as follows:

A. That establishing a standardized refund policy promotes fairness, transparency, and consistency in the administration of such fees.

B. The City Council finds that the proposed amendment is consistent with the goals and policies of the City of Banning General Plan, including Housing Element Goal

1.0, which promotes the maintenance and preservation of the City’s existing housing stock; and
SECTION 5. AMENDMENT TO THE BANNING MUNCICPAL CODE.

Chapter 15.12 - Permits, is amended to add Section 15.12.055 – Refunds, to read as follows:

Section 15.12.055 - Refunds.

A. The Building Official may issue a refund if the applicant meets the following eligibility requirements:

1. If the applicant withdraws its application prior to the initiation of the plan review process, a refund of up to eighty percent (80%) of the permit fee may be refunded if no plan review has been performed.

2. If the Plan review process has been initiated but not completed, up to fifty percent (50%) of the plan review fee may be refunded, as determined by the Building 215
Ordinance 1623

Official based upon the percentage of plan review work completed. In no event will the refund exceed fifty percent (50%) of the plan review fee.

3. If the plan review has been completed but a permit has not been issued, a refund of the plan review fees is not authorized and will not be granted. A full refund of the permit Inspection fees may be refunded if the permit has not been issued.

4. If the permit has been issued but no inspections have been performed up to eighty percent (80%) of the inspection fee may be refunded.

5. If the permit has been issued and inspections performed, a refund of the permit inspection fees is not authorized and will not be granted.

B. The following fees are not eligible for refund:

1. Permits that have expired due to inactivity or abandonment.

2. Permits that have been finaled or closed.

3. Administrative and processing fees.

4. State-mandated fees (including, but not limited to, seismic and fire-related surcharges).

5. Third-party consultant or contract service fees.

C. Exceptions:

The Building Official, in his or her sole discretion, may authorize exceptions where a fee was collected in error or where extraordinary circumstances justify deviation from this policy.

SECTION 7. CERTIFICATION AND PUBLICATION.

The Mayor shall sign and the City Clerk is directed to certify the passage and adoption of this Ordinance; cause it to be entered into the City of Banning’s book of original ordinances; make a note of the passage and adoption in the records of this meeting; and, within fifteen (15) days after the passage and adoption of this Ordinance, cause it to be published or posted in accordance with California law.

SECTION 8. EFFECTIVE DATE.

This Ordinance will become final and effective thirty (30) days following its passage and adoption by the City Council.

INTRODUCED AND READ for the first time and ordered posted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Banning, California, held on the 26th day of May 2026, by the following roll call vote:

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 9th day of June 2026. 216
Ordinance 1623

Richard Royce, Mayor
City of Banning
ATTEST:

Sandra Calderon, Deputy City Clerk
City of Banning
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

John Pinkney, City Attorney
Slovak, Baron, Empey, Murphy & Pinkney,
LLP
217
Ordinance 1623

CERTIFICATION:

I, Sandra Calderon, Deputy City Clerk of the City of Banning, California, do hereby certify that Ordinance 1623 was duly introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Banning, held on the 26th day of May 2026, and was duly adopted at a regular meeting of said City Council on the 9th day of June 2026, by the following vote, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Sandra Calderon, Deputy City Clerk
City of Banning, California
218
FILER

SANDRA CALDERON
[email protected]
(951) 922-3125

FILING FOR
Record Gazette

INTERIM AD DRAFT
This is the proof of your ad scheduled to run in Record Gazette on the dates indicated below. If changes are needed, please contact us prior to deadline at (951) 849-4586.

Notice ID: 1kDAQmS91IYa94LRGzZC | Proof Updated: May. 11, 2026 at 10:17am PDT Notice Name: Title 15 Amendment NOPH
This is not an invoice. Below is an estimated price, and it is subject to change. You will receive an invoice with the final price upon invoice creation by the publisher.

Columns Wide: 1
Total Column Inches: 16.74
Number of Lines: 151
Ad Class: Legals
05/15/2026: City Legal Notices 282.21
Subtotal $282.21
Tax $0.00
Processing Fee $0.00
Total $282.21
See Proof on Next Page
Title 15 Amendment NOPH - Page 1 of 2
219
Title 15 Amendment NOPH - Page 2 of 2
220

CITY OF BANNING

STAFF REPORT
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Elizabeth Gibbs, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Phaedra Norton,
MEETING DATE: May 26, 2026
SUBJECT: Consideration of Motion for Censure Initiated by Councilmember Flynn against Councilmember Wallace
RECOMMENDATION:

None
BACKGROUND:

Banning Municipal Code Section 2.04.060 – Public Censure of Council Members Pursuant to B.M.C. section 2.04.060(A), it shall be a violation of this section for any sitting member of the Banning city council to violate any general law or regulation, and any rule, law, ordinance or resolution of the city. It shall also be a violation of this section for any sitting member of the city council to violate an administrative policy of the city which has been adopted following a vote of the council on the matter and which by its terms is expressly made applicable to the city council.

Pursuant to B.M.C. section 2.04.060(B), any violation of subsection A may be punished through the administration of a public censure of the council member by the Banning city council. Such censure may be in addition to any other punishment applicable to the violation.

Pursuant to B.M.C. section 2.04.060(C), a councilmember may not be made the subject of a motion for censure without first being given notice of the violation and an opportunity to correct the violation. Upon a continued violation or failure to correct, the councilmember shall be given notice and an opportunity to be heard.

As a precursor to consideration of a motion to censure the procedural step set forth in B.M.C. section

2.04.060(C) must be satisfied. Upon a continued violation or failure to correct, the councilmember shall be given notice and an opportunity to be heard as follows:

1. Only a sitting member of the Banning city council may initiate proceedings for the censure of its members.

2. Proceedings shall be commenced by the presentation of a written statement of charges to the subject councilmember by the councilmember initiating the charges. The statement of charges shall be given at least two council meetings prior to that at which the censure motion is proposed to be brought. The notice shall contain, at a minimum, the designation of the specific rule, law, regulation, etc. which the councilmember is claimed to have violated and a statement of the date, place, and time at which the violation occurred. The statement shall further contain a description of the conduct of the councilmember which is alleged to constitute the violation. The statement of charges shall be delivered to all other 221
council persons and made a part of the public record at the council meeting next occurring after date of its delivery.

3. The motion to censure shall be considered at the second regularly scheduled meeting following that at which the statement of charges is entered into the public record. The hearing may not be continued except upon the absence from the meeting of a member of the city council other than the member bringing the charge or the member who is the subject of the charge.

The hearing shall generally proceed as follows:
a. The hearing shall be conducted in open session.
b. A reading of the charges by the charging member.
c. A statement in rebuttal by the member charged.
d. After reading of the charges, each member may present witnesses in support of their case. e. The member bringing the charges shall be allowed to make a closing statement. f. The member being charged shall be allowed to make a closing statement and shall be allowed to speak last.
g. Members of the public may speak in favor or opposed to the charge(s). h. The remaining council members may speak to the charges. i. Vote on the motion shall be by the three nonparty members of the City Council. i. A unanimous vote of the three members is required to sustain a motion for censure. ii. The voting members shall not go into closed session for deliberation.

4. If the motion for censure does not pass, the proceedings shall be at an end. A new motion for censure on the same grounds may not thereafter be commenced against the same councilmember for a period of one calendar year from date of the vote. However, new proceedings may be commenced on the same charges within the one-year period on the vote of four members of the city council.

5. If the motion for censure does pass, such motion shall become a part of the public record a copy of which shall be made available upon demand to any member of the public and notice of the same shall be placed in the administrative file of the city councilmember.

JUSTIFICATION:

N/A
FISCAL IMPACT:

The cost to prepare this report.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Attachment 1 - Communication dated November 19, 2025 from CM Flynn to the other Council Members.pdf

2. Attachment 2 - Communication dated April 27, 2026 from CM Flynn to CM Wallace and Vickie Sellers.pdf

3. Attachment 3 - Communication dated May 20, 2026, from CM Flynn_Redacted.pdf

4. Attachment 4 - Link to the April 28, 2026, City Council Meeting.pdf 222
223
From: Sheri Flynn
Sent: Monday, April 27, 2026 7:16 PM
To: Colleen Wallace <[email protected]>; Vickie Sellers <[email protected]> Subject: Demand for Censure
April 27, 2026
Formal Request for Censure of Council Member Colleen Wallace Dear Council Member Wallace,
You have not followed the Banning Manual of Procedural Guidelines (BMPG) nor the Banning Municipal Code (BMC) concerning Public Censure between Council Members for misconduct in your complaint against another Council member while serving as an elected City Council member. The violations are outlined below.

Pursuant to the City of Banning’s Municipal Code- Public Censure of Council Members section 2.04.060, it is provided:

A. It shall be a violation of this section for any sitting member of the Banning city council to violate any general law or regulation, and any rule, law, ORDINANCE or resolution of the City. It shall also be a violation of this section for any sitting member of the city council to violate an ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY of the City which has been adopted following a vote of the Council on the matter and which by its terms is EXPRESSLY MADE APPLICABLE TO THE CITY COUNCIL. (emphasis mine)
B. Any violation of subsection A may be punished through the administration of a public censure of the council member by the Banning city council. Such censure may be in addition to any other punishment applicable to the violation.

1.For purposes of this section “censure” shall mean the adoption of a motion setting forth a strong statement of disapproval of a councilmember’s conduct.

C. A councilmember may not be made the subject of a motion for censure without first being given notice of the violation and an opportunity to correct the violation. Upon a continued violation or failure to correct, the councilmember shall be
given notice and an opportunity to be heard.

CENSURE AS A POLICY IS THEREFORE TO BE USED TO ADDRESS GRIEVANCES

AND MISCONDUCT BETWEEN CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS AND IS A PROCESS 224

EXPRESSLY MADE APPLICABLE TO THE LEGISLATIVE BODY AS ELECTED OFFICIALS AND DOES NOT APPLY TO EMPLOYEES.

PLEASE NOTE: The Banning Municipal Code takes precedence over all other policies in that it is actual law passed by Ordinance.

THE COMPLAINT FOR CENSURE:

Your complaint against me was filed with HR on May 19th, 2025. I was not informed of said complaint until September 30, 2025. Notice of the proper procedure to follow in the case of complaints between Council Members as being censure was sent to you, Council Member Wallace, in an email on November 19, 2025 by me, the acting Mayor. You were given notice of the proper procedure that must be used for complaints of misconduct/complaints between council members and given time to correct it- you chose not to do so. You do not get to ignore proper procedures for complaints as outlined in the BMPG and the BMC and proceed to make claims against a sitting elected City Council Member just so those claims will not be aired in public and thus preventing the accused council member the right to respond, in a public hearing, to those charges in the process as delineated in the BMC. You have not followed the BMC, 2.04.060, nor the Banning Manual of Procedural Guidelines 9.5 concerning Public Censure between Council Members for misconduct in your complaint filed against another Council member while serving as an elected City Council member.

ALSO, AN ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY VIOLATION ALSO OCCURED WHEN YOU

IMPROPERLY FILED A COMPLAINT WITH THE HR MANAGER AGAINST A FELLOW COUNCIL MEMBER ON MAY 19, 2025, WHEREAS BOTH YOU AND HER THEN PROCEEDED TO NOT FOLLOW THE CITY’S PROCEDURE FOR CENSURE AS OUTLINED IN 2.04.060 OF THE BMC, NOR 9.5 OF THE BMPG FOR COMPLAINTS BETWEEN COUNCIL MEMBERS.

As provided for in the City’s Administrative Policy IV.2, complaints regarding a member of the City Council should be reported to the City Manager or the City Attorney (Section IV.2(e)) who then become the designated Processor and are NOT to be reported first to HR as was done by you. Proper procedure was, therefore, not followed by you, Council member Wallace, in that the complaint was filed by you directly with Human Resources and not the City Attorney nor the City Manager as required.

Even if HR were to be the designated Processor, which it is not, you, nor HR, followed Administrative Policy IV.2 sections 3, 4, 5, and 6.

You therefore failed to follow the policy of Censure as required by the Municipal Code section 2.04.060, nor the Administrative Policy outlined in #AP-14. Instead you escalated the complaint to HR who sent it to ERMA causing an unnecessary and illegal subsequent City and thus taxpayer funded outside independent investigation to go forward.

The HR Manager, in her memorandum to me dated January 13, 2026 states in part:
“THE CITY IS CONDUCTING AN INDEPENDENT ADMINISTRATIVE INVESTIGATION INTO COUNCILMEMBER COLLEN WALLACE’S ALLEGATIONS REGARDING MISCONDUCT BY YOU”.

HOWEVER, THE ALLEGATIONS LODGED AGAINST ME ALL FALL UNDER THE BMC225 PUBLIC CENSURE OF COUNCIL MEMBERS as you and I are elected City Council officials.

This is confirmed in the last paragraph: "Furthermore, even if an allegation of MISCONDUCT is sustained…… the City does not have legal authority to take corrective action against a council member”.

EXACTLY- only City Council members may take corrective action against a council member for complaints of misconduct against another council member utilizing the formal procedure of CENSURE. Censure is a remedy exclusive to the Council, allowing complaints between Council members to be open, transparent, and to be held at a public hearing -giving both members a fair chance to be heard while allowing the public to also participate- not hidden behind closed doors as has been done with your complaint.

Neither YOU, City Council Member Wallace, the City Attorney, the City Manager, nor HR , followed those policies or procedures that address complaints between council members.

Furthermore, when I asked the City Attorney repeatedly to inform you of the proper way to address complaints between council members my requests were ignored. Instead, a policy was followed as if you and I are simply EMPLOYEES instead of elected officials. We are not and as elected officials we have our own separate censure policy codified in 2.04.060 of the Banning Municipal Code that we are required to follow for complaints of misconduct between Council members.

Instead, it was elevated to ERMA and then to an outside administrative investigation with an investigator chosen and paid for by the City. I was only informed of your complaint five and a half months after your initial complaint negating my rights to prompt notification and due process. The outside investigator was paid for by the City and thus the citizens of Banning with taxpayer monies, of which the City, as you were made clearly aware of, has very little to spend. No taxpayer money would have been unduly spent if the proper policy of censure had been the course taken.

This request for censure of you, Council Member Wallace, is not concerning the actual complaint you filed against me, nor the contents of that complaint, but instead my request for censure of you is being pursued due to your lack of following the proper procedures even though you were given notice of those proper procedures needing to be followed as outlined in the BMPG and the Banning Municipal Code for complaints against and between elected Legislative Body Members in an email sent by me as Mayor to you on November 19, 2025.

Therefore, I am formally giving YOU, COUNCILMEMBER COLLEEN WALLACE, THIS

WRITTEN STATEMENT OF CHARGES OF YOUR CONTINUED VIOLATION AND

FAILURE TO CORRECT THE MUNICIPAL CODE AND ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY VIOLATIONS LISTED.

I AM REQUESTING PROCEEDINGS BE COMMENCED AGAINST COUNCILMEMBER COLLEEN WALLACE UNDER PUBLIC CENSURE OF COUNCIL MEMBERS. SECTION C, 1 through 5, AS OUTLINED IN THE BANNING MUNICIPAL CODE, SECTION 2.04.060.

AND THE APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE BMPG 9.5.
226
Sincerely,
Sheri Flynn
City Council Member, City of Banning
cc Victoria Sellers, City Clerk
227
You don't often get email from Learn why this is important From: Sheri Flynn
Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2026 3:50 PM
To: John O. Pinkney <[email protected]>; Phaedra Norton <[email protected]> Subject: Fw: Demand for Censure
I also gave her and the City Clerk, along with Councilman Miller, a paper copy before the meeting and confirmed that Cindy and Richard had both received the request by email.

Sheri
Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
Begin forwarded message:

On Monday, April 27, 2026, 7:16 PM, Sheri Flynn wrote:

April 27, 2026
Formal Request for Censure of Council Member Colleen Wallace Dear Council Member Wallace,
You have not followed the Banning Manual of Procedural Guidelines (BMPG) nor the Banning Municipal Code (BMC) concerning Public Censure between Council Members for misconduct in your complaint against another Council member while serving as an elected City Council member. The violations are outlined below.

Pursuant to the City of Banning’s Municipal Code- Public Censure of Council Members section 2.04.060, it is provided:

A. It shall be a violation of this section for any sitting member of the Banning city council to violate any general law or regulation, and any rule, law, ORDINANCE or resolution of the City. It shall also be a violation of this section for any sitting member of the city council to violate an ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY of the City which has been adopted following a vote of the Council on the matter and which by its terms is EXPRESSLY MADE APPLICABLE TO THE CITY COUNCIL. (emphasis mine)
B. Any violation of subsection A may be punished through the administration of a public censure of the council member by the Banning city council.

Such censure may be in addition to any other punishment applicable to the violation.
228

1. For purposes of this section “censure” shall mean the adoption of a motion setting forth a strong statement of disapproval of a councilmember’s conduct.

C. A councilmember may not be made the subject of a motion for censure
without first being given notice of the violation and an opportunity to correct the
violation. Upon a continued violation or failure to correct, the councilmember shall be
given notice and an opportunity to be heard.

CENSURE AS A POLICY IS THEREFORE TO BE USED TO ADDRESS

GRIEVANCES AND MISCONDUCT BETWEEN CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS

AND IS A PROCESS EXPRESSLY MADE APPLICABLE TO THE

LEGISLATIVE BODY AS ELECTED OFFICIALS AND DOES NOT APPLY TO EMPLOYEES.

PLEASE NOTE: The Banning Municipal Code takes precedence over all other policies in that it is actual law passed by Ordinance.

THE COMPLAINT FOR CENSURE:

Your complaint against me was filed with HR on May 19th, 2025. I was not informed of said complaint until September 30, 2025. Notice of the proper procedure to follow in the case of complaints between Council Members as being censure was sent to you, Council Member Wallace, in an email on November 19, 2025 by me, the acting Mayor. You were given notice of the proper procedure that must be used for complaints of misconduct/complaints between council members and given time to correct it- you chose not to do so.

You do not get to ignore proper procedures for complaints as outlined in the BMPG and the BMC and proceed to make claims against a sitting elected City Council Member just so those claims will not be aired in public and thus preventing the accused council member the right to respond, in a public hearing, to those charges in the process as delineated in the BMC. You have not followed the BMC, 2.04.060, nor the Banning Manual of Procedural Guidelines 9.5 concerning Public Censure between Council Members for misconduct in your complaint filed against another Council member while serving as an elected City Council member.

ALSO, AN ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY VIOLATION ALSO OCCURED WHEN

YOU IMPROPERLY FILED A COMPLAINT WITH THE HR MANAGER
AGAINST A FELLOW COUNCIL MEMBER ON MAY 19, 2025, WHEREAS BOTH YOU AND HER THEN PROCEEDED TO NOT FOLLOW THE CITY’S PROCEDURE FOR CENSURE AS OUTLINED IN 2.04.060 OF THE BMC, NOR 9.5 OF THE BMPG FOR COMPLAINTS BETWEEN COUNCIL
MEMBERS.

As provided for in the City’s Administrative Policy IV.2, complaints regarding a member of the City Council should be reported to the City Manager or the City 229
Attorney (Section IV.2(e)) who then become the designated Processor and are NOT to be reported first to HR as was done by you. Proper procedure was, therefore, not followed by you, Council member Wallace, in that the complaint was filed by you directly with Human Resources and not the City Attorney nor the City Manager as required.

Even if HR were to be the designated Processor, which it is not, you, nor HR, followed Administrative Policy IV.2 sections 3, 4, 5, and 6.

You therefore failed to follow the policy of Censure as required by the Municipal Code section 2.04.060, nor the Administrative Policy outlined in #AP-14.

Instead you escalated the complaint to HR who sent it to ERMA causing an unnecessary and illegal subsequent City and thus taxpayer funded outside independent investigation to go forward.

The HR Manager, in her memorandum to me dated January 13, 2026 states in part:
“THE CITY IS CONDUCTING AN INDEPENDENT ADMINISTRATIVE
INVESTIGATION INTO COUNCILMEMBER COLLEN WALLACE’S
ALLEGATIONS REGARDING MISCONDUCT BY YOU”.

HOWEVER, THE ALLEGATIONS LODGED AGAINST ME ALL FALL UNDER THE BMC- PUBLIC CENSURE OF COUNCIL MEMBERS as you and I are elected City Council officials.

This is confirmed in the last paragraph: "Furthermore, even if an allegation of MISCONDUCT is sustained…… the City does not have legal authority to take corrective action against a council member”.

EXACTLY- only City Council members may take corrective action against a council member for complaints of misconduct against another council member utilizing the formal procedure of CENSURE. Censure is a remedy exclusive to the Council, allowing complaints between Council members to be open, transparent, and to be held at a public hearing -giving both members a fair chance to be heard while allowing the public to also participate- not hidden behind closed doors as has been done with your complaint.

Neither YOU, City Council Member Wallace, the City Attorney, the City Manager, nor HR , followed those policies or procedures that address complaints between council members. Furthermore, when I asked the City Attorney repeatedly to inform you of the proper way to address complaints between council members my requests were ignored. Instead, a policy was followed as if you and I are simply EMPLOYEES instead of elected officials.

We are not and as elected officials we have our own separate censure policy codified in 2.04.060 of the Banning Municipal Code that we are required to follow for complaints of misconduct between Council members.

Instead, it was elevated to ERMA and then to an outside administrative investigation with an investigator chosen and paid for by the City. I was only informed of your complaint five and a half months after your initial complaint 230
negating my rights to prompt notification and due process. The outside investigator was paid for by the City and thus the citizens of Banning with taxpayer monies, of which the City, as you were made clearly aware of, has very little to spend. No taxpayer money would have been unduly spent if the proper policy of censure had been the course taken.

This request for censure of you, Council Member Wallace, is not concerning the actual complaint you filed against me, nor the contents of that complaint, but instead my request for censure of you is being pursued due to your lack of following the proper procedures even though you were given notice of those proper procedures needing to be followed as outlined in the BMPG and the Banning Municipal Code for complaints against and between elected Legislative Body Members in an email sent by me as Mayor to you on November 19, 2025.

Therefore, I am formally giving YOU, COUNCILMEMBER COLLEEN

WALLACE, THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT OF CHARGES OF YOUR

CONTINUED VIOLATION AND FAILURE TO CORRECT THE MUNICIPAL CODE AND ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY VIOLATIONS LISTED.

I AM REQUESTING PROCEEDINGS BE COMMENCED AGAINST

COUNCILMEMBER COLLEEN WALLACE UNDER PUBLIC CENSURE OF
COUNCIL MEMBERS. SECTION C, 1 through 5, AS OUTLINED IN THE BANNING MUNICIPAL CODE, SECTION 2.04.060. AND THE APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE BMPG 9.5.

Sincerely,
Sheri Flynn
City Council Member, City of Banning
cc Victoria Sellers, City Clerk
231
Attachment 4
Link to the Banning City Council Meeting – April 28, 2026 https://banninglive.viebit.com/watch?hash=tPQ84ny7iwlRn5a5 232

CITY OF BANNING

STAFF REPORT
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Elizabeth Gibbs, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Patrick Safari, Capital Improvement Projects Manager Art Vela, Director of Public Works
MEETING DATE: May 26, 2026
SUBJECT: Consideration of Resolution 2026-75, Approving the 2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey and Adopting Updated Speed Limits for 70 Specified Streets Within the City of Banning.

RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt Resolution 2026-75
BACKGROUND:

The California Vehicle Code (CVC) Section 22357 requires that posted speed limits along public roadways be established and justified by an Engineering and Traffic Survey (E&TS). Furthermore, according to CVC Section 40802, the Speed Survey needs to be updated every five to seven years to allow enforcement of motorists’ speeds by local law enforcement agencies.

The current Speed Survey was conducted in November 2017 and was adopted by City Council on February 27, 2018, under Resolution 2017-112. Those speed limits are now outdated, and a new survey is required to comply with CVC and enable continued radar enforcement by the Police Department.

In October 2021, Assembly Bill 43 (AB 43) was signed into law, providing local agencies with more flexibility in lowering and maintaining speed limits. Key changes incorporated into this 2025 survey include:

Extended Validity Period: An E&TS conducted more than 7 years ago may be extended to 14 years if a traffic engineer certifies no changes in roadway or traffic conditions have occurred CVC 40802(c)(2)(B)(i)(II).

Safety Corridors: Local authorities may designate safety corridors and reduce speed limits by an additional 5 mph on those segments.

Retention of Prior Limits: A local authority may retain the current speed limit or restore the immediately prior speed limit if no additional general-purpose lanes have been added.

The 2025 E&TS surveyed 70 street segments to justify and update posted speed limits, ensuring the City's speed limits are legally defensible and eligible for radar enforcement.

On April 22, 2025, City Council approved Resolution No. 2025-49, awarding a Professional Services Agreement for Engineering and Traffic Survey to Willdan Engineering in the amount of $35,957.

Willdan Engineering completed the 2025 E&TS in October 2025. The survey included radar speed measurements, Average Daily Traffic (ADT) counts, crash history analysis using SWITRS data (April 233
2022 to March 2025), and field reviews of roadway conditions at all 70 locations.

Summary of Recommendations:

Category Number of Segments
Total Segments Surveyed 70
Segments with Recommended
Speed Limit Changes
46 Segments Maintaining Existing
Speed Limit
24 Key Recommended Changes:

Ramsey Street (22nd Street to 8th Street): Reduced from 40 mph to 30 mph due to Safety Corridor designation, uncontrolled crosswalks, and moderate pedestrian use.

Nicolet Street (San Gorgonio Avenue to Hathaway Street): Reduced from 30/35 mph to a uniform 30 mph due to uncontrolled crosswalks, moderate pedestrian use, sidewalk gaps, and hidden driveways.

Ramsey Street (8th Street to Martin Street): Maintained at 25 mph, qualifying as a Business Activity District under CVC 22358.9.

Ramsey Street (Martin Street to Hargrave Street): Increased to 30 mph from 25 mph due to moderate pedestrian activity.

Bluff Street (Hale Lane to San Gorgonio Avenue): New speed limit of 40 mph established (closest to 85th percentile speed).

Various residential streets (8th Street, George Street, Wesley Street, Williams Street): Reduced to 25 mph under Residential District classification criteria.

Safety Corridors: Six segments have been designated as Safety Corridors under AB 43 (including segments on Ramsey Street, Nicolet Street, Westward Avenue, and Wilson Street), allowing for additional 5 mph reductions were justified by fatal and severe injury crash data. The total Safety Corridor length is 7.53 miles, which is within the statutory limit of 1/5 of the City's total roadway network (46 miles).

At a later date, the Public Works and Police Department will consider a separate ordinance to establish a 25-mph speed limit on all local residential streets.

JUSTIFICATION:

It is necessary that the City approve the 2025 E&TS. The 2025 E&TS provides the foundation for setting and enforcing speed limits on specific streets within Banning. It was developed in accordance with the California Vehicle Code (CVC) and followed the procedures set forth in the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices Revision 9 (CA MUTCD).

FISCAL IMPACT:

If approved, various signs and pavement markings will need to be replaced to comply with the 2025 E&TS, at an estimated cost of $45,000. The associated work will be funded through the Gas Tax Fund 100.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution 2026-75.docx
234

2. Resolution No. 2017-112.pdf

3. Resolution No. 2025-049.pdf

4. Banning E&T Report 2025.pdf

5. Streets Speed Limit Exhibits.pdf
235
Resolution 2026-75

RESOLUTION 2026-75

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BANNING, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE 2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY AND ADOPTING UPDATED SPEED LIMITS FOR 70 SPECIFIED STREETS WITHIN THE CITY OF BANNING.

WHEREAS, the California Vehicle Code (CVC) Section 22357 requires that posted speed limits along public roadways be established and justified by an Engineering and Traffic Survey (E&TS); and
WHEREAS, according to CVC Section 40802, the Speed Survey needs to be updated every five to seven years to allow enforcement of motorists’ speeds by local law enforcement agencies; and
WHEREAS, the current Speed Survey was conducted in November 2017 and was adopted by City Council on February 27, 2018 under Resolution 2017-112; and WHEREAS, an updated Speed Survey is needed to be in compliance with the CVC; and WHEREAS, on April 22, 2025, City Council approved Resolution No. 2025-49, awarding a Professional Services Agreement for Engineering and Traffic Survey to Willdan Engineering in the amount of $35,957; and
WHEREAS, Willdan Engineering completed the 2025 E&TS in October 2025 which included radar speed measurements, Average Daily Traffic (ADT) counts, crash history analysis using SWITRS data (April 2022 to March 2025), and field reviews of roadway conditions at all 70 locations; and
WHEREAS, seventy segments were surveyed, of which forty-six segments were recommended for speed limit changes and twenty-four were recommended for maintaining the current speed limit; and
WHEREAS, key changes will include the establishment of safety corridors, reduction of speed limits in various residential streets and increase of speed limits in streets with moderate pedestrian activity; and
WHEREAS, the 2025 E&TS provides the foundation for setting and enforcing speed limits on specific streets within Banning. It was developed in accordance with the California Vehicle Code (CVC) and followed the procedures set forth in the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices Revision 9 (CA MUTCD).

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Banning as follows:

SECTION 1. The City of Banning approves the 2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey.

SECTION 2. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution and shall cause a certified resolution to be filed in the book of original resolutions.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 26th day of May 2026. 236
Resolution 2026-75

Richard Royce, Mayor
City of Banning
ATTEST:

Sandra Calderon, Deputy City Clerk
City of Banning
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

John Pinkney, City Attorney
Slovak, Baron, Empey, Murphy & Pinkney,
LLP
237
Resolution 2026-75

CERTIFICATION:

I, Sandra Calderon, Deputy City Clerk of the City of Banning, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution 2026-75, was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Banning, California, at a regular meeting thereof held on the 26th day of May 2026 by the following vote, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Sandra Calderon, Deputy City Clerk
City of Banning, California
238
Resolution 2026-75

EXHIBIT A
2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
239
RESOLUTION 2017- 12

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BANNING, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE 2017 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
WHEREAS, speed limits in California are governed by the California Vehicle Code ( CVC), which also establishes generally -applicable maximum speed limits for all streets in the State; and
WHEREAS, Sections 22357, 22358 and 22358. 3of the CVC allow local authorities to establish speed limits other than those mandated by the state by ordinance, provided that such limits are justified by an engineering and traffic survey ETS) to be performed every five years, seven years or ten years as specified in Section 40802 of the CVC; and
WHEREAS, the City entered into a contract with Albert A. Webb and Associates in March, 2017 to conduct and prepare an ETS for selected street segments throughout the City; and
WHEREAS, the results of the ETS are contained in a report prepared by Albert A. Webb and Associates entitled " Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits" dated February 2018; and
WHEREAS, the Public Works Department' sEngineering Division has reviewed the Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits dated February 2018, and recommends that the City Council approve the report, as well as the speed limits recommended for establishment on highway segments throughout the City therein.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Banning as follows:

SECTION 1. The City Council finds that all of the facts set forth in this Resolution are true and correct.

SECTION 2. The City Council has reviewed the Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits dated February 2018.

SECTION 3. The City Council approves of the Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits dated February 2018, as well as the speed limits recommended for establishment therein.

SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall certify the passage and adoption of this Resolution, and it shall thereupon take effect.
1 Resolution 2017- 12
240
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 27th day of February, 2018.

ATTEST:

Sonja D' 1Fuente, Deputy City Clerk
City of Banning

APPROVED AS TO FORM AND
LEGAL CONTENT:

Kevin G. Ennis, City Attorney
Richards, Watson & Gershon
2 rge ' o er, M'" or
City of Banning
Resolution 2017- 12
241
CERTIFICATION:

I, Sonja De La Fuente, Deputy City Clerk of the City of Banning, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution 2017- 112, was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Banning, California, at a
regular meeting thereof held on the 27th day of
February 2018, by the following vote, to wit:

AYES: Council Members Andrade, Franklin, Peterson, Welch, and Mayor Moyer NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: None
3 Sonja De La uente, Deputy City Clerk
City of Banning, California
Resolution 2017- 12
242
RESOLUTION 2025- 49

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BANNING, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR PROJECT NO. 2025- 01 ONCALL ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY TO WILLDAN GROUP, INC. OF SAN BERNARDINO, CA IN THE AMOUNT OF $ 35, 957 AND APPROVING A 10% CONTINGENCY FOR A TOTAL PROJECT BUDGET OF " NOT- TO- EXCEED" $ 39, 552. 70 WHEREAS, the California Vehicle Code ( CVC) Section 22357 requires that posted speed limits along public roadways be established and justified by an Engineering and Traffic Survey E&TS); and
WHEREAS, according to CVC Section 40802, the E& TS needs to be updated every five to seven years to allow enforcement of motorists' speeds by local law enforcement agencies; and WHEREAS, the current E& TS was conducted in September 2017 and was adopted by City Council in November 2017 under Resolution 2017- 112; and WHEREAS, an updated E& TS is needed to be in compliance with the CVC; and WHEREAS, On January 29, 2025, Public Works and Purchasing staff advertised a Request for Proposal ( RFP 24-093) on the City' s online public procurement system and on March 11, 2025 the City received two ( 2) proposals ranging in score from 85.5 to 83; and WHEREAS, the E&TS will consist of radar speed measurements of the prevailing free flow speeds along 43 street segments, a review of collision history reports, and a review of existing roadside conditions including the identification of conditions not readily apparent to the motorists.; and
WHEREAS, it is essential that the City Council approve the On- Call Engineering and Traffic Survey which will serve as the basis for the establishment and enforcement of speed limits for selected streets within the City of Banning; and
WHEREAS, staff recommend awarding a Professional Services Agreement to Willdan Group, Inc. in the amount of $ 35,957 and approving a 10% contingency in the amount of 3,595. 70 for a total " not- to-exceed" project budget of$ 39,552. 70; and WHEREAS, an appropriation from the Gas Tax Fund 100 balance to Account No. 100- 4900- 431. 95- 10 in the amount of $ 35,957 is necessary to fund the Professional Services Agreement with Willdan Group, Inc ..

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Banning as follows:

SECTION 1. The City of Banning approves the Professional Services Agreement between Willdan Group, Inc. and the City of Banning.

SECTION 2. The City Council authorizes the City Manager, or designee, to make necessary budget adjustments, appropriations, and transfers related to the Professional Services Agreement with Willdan Group, Inc.

Resolution 2025- 49

243
SECTION 3. The City Council authorizes the City Manager to make necessary non- substantive changes and to execute the Professional Services Agreement with Willdan Group, Inc.

SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution and shall cause a certified resolution to be filed in the book of original resolutions.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 22nd day of April 2025.

ATTEST:

Sandra Calderon, Acting Administrative
City Clerk
City of Banning
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Jo~~ ey
Resolution 2025- 49

Sher IFlynn, Mayor
City of Banning
244
CERTIFICATION:

I, Sandra Calderon, Acting Administrative City Clerk of the City of Banning, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution 2025- 49, was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Banning, California, at a regular meeting thereof held on the 22nd day of April 2025 by the following vote, to wit:

AYES: Barrington, Flynn, Miller, Royce, Wallace
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
Resolution 2025- 49

CwcleAOtu
Sandra Calderon,
Acting Administrative City Clerk
City of Banning, California
245
Resolution 2025- 49

EXHIBIT A
Professional Services Agreement with Willdan Group, Inc. 246
AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ( C01143) FOR ONCALL ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEYS BY AND BETWEEN

CITY OF BANNING AND WILLDAN ENGINEERING
THIS AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ( herein "Agreement") is made and entered into this day: ________ , (" Effective Date") by and between the CITY OF BANNING, a California municipal corporation (" City") and Willdan Engineering, a California Corporation, (" Consultant"). City and Consultant are sometimes hereinafter individually referred to as " Party" and hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Parties."

RECITALS
A. City has sought by a Request for a Proposal (RFP #24-093) for the performance of the services for On-Call Engineering & Traffic Surveys Services and as further defined and described particularly in Article 1 ofthis Agreement.

B. Consultant, following submission of a proposal for the performance ofthe services defined and described particularly in Article 1 ofthis Agreement, was selected by City to perform those services.

C. The Parties desire to formalize the selection ofConsultant for performance ofthose services defined and described particularly in Article 1 ofthis Agreement and desire that the terms ofthat performance be as particularly defined and described herein.

D. Pursuant to the City ofBanning's Municipal Code, City has authority to enter into this Agreement.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration ofthe mutual promises and covenants made by the Parties and contained herein and other consideration, the value and adequacy ofwhich are hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:

ARTICLE 1. SERVICES OF CONSUL TANT

1.1 Scope of Services.

In compliance with all terms and conditions of this Agreement, Consultant shall provide those services specified in the "Scope of Services" attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference, which services may be referred to herein as the "Services" hereunder. As a material inducement to City entering into this Agreement, Consultant represents and warrants that it has the qualifications, experience, and facilities necessary to properly perform the Services required under this Agreement in a thorough, competent, and professional manner, and is experienced in performing the Services contemplated herein. Consultant shall at all times faithfully, competently and to the best of its ability, experience and talent, perform all Services described herein. Consultant covenants that it shall follow the highest professional standards in performing the Services required hereunder and that all materials will be of good quality, and fit for the purpose intended. For purposes of this Agreement, the phrase " highest professional 1-
247
standards" shall mean those standards of practice recognized by one or more first-class firms performing similar work under similar circwnstances.

1.2 Contract Documents and Exhibits.

This Agreement includes the Request for Proposal and Consultant' s accepted proposal Contract Documents"), both of which are on file with the City and incorporated herein by this general reference as though fully set forth herein. Exhibit A (Scope of Services), Exhibit B Special Requirements), Exhibit C (Schedule of Compensation), and Exhibit D ( Schedule of Performance) also constitute a part ofthis Agreement and are incorporated into this Agreement by this reference. Except as set forth in Section 1.10 regarding Exhibit B, this Agreement controls over the Contract Documents and the provisions in Exhibits A, Band C.

1.3 Compliance with Law.

Consultant shall keep itself informed concerning all ordinances, resolutions, statutes, rules, and regulations of City and any Federal, State or local governmental entity having jurisdiction in effect at the time service is rendered, and shall render all Services hereunder in accordance therewith.

1.4 Licenses, Permits, Fees and Assessments.

Consultant shall obtain and maintain during the term ofthis Agreement, at its sole cost and expense, all necessary licenses, permits, certificates and approvals required by law for the performance ofServices under this Agreement, including a City business license. Consultant shall have the sole obligation to pay for all fees, assessments and taxes, plus applicable penalties and interest, which may be imposed by law and which arise from or are necessary for Consultant' s performance of the Services required by this Agreement. Consultant shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless City, its officers, employees or agents, against all such fees, assessments, taxes, penalties or interest levied, assessed or imposed against City hereunder.

1.5 Familiarity with Services.

By executing this Agreement, Consultant warrants that Consultant: ( i) has thoroughly investigated and considered the Scope of Services to be performed, ( ii) has carefully considered how the Services should be performed, and (iii) fully understands the facilities and any difficulties and restrictions attending performance of the Services under this Agreement. If the Services involve work upon any site, Consultant warrants that Consultant has or will investigate the site and is or will be fully acquainted with the conditions existing therein, prior to commencement of Services hereunder. Should Consultant discover any latent or unknown conditions, which will materially affect the performance of the Services hereunder, Consultant shall immediately inform City of such fact and shall not proceed except at Consultant' s risk until written instructions are received from the Contract Officer (defined in Section 1.12. A).

1.6 Prevention of Loss and Damages.

Consultant shall adopt reasonable methods during the Term ( defined in Section 3.4) to furnish continuous protection to the work product, and the equipment, materials, papers, 2-
248
documents, plans, studies and/or other components thereof to prevent losses or damages, and shall be responsible for all such damages, to persons or property, until acceptance of the Services by City, except such losses or damages as may be caused by City's own negligence.

1.7 Further Responsibilities ofParties.

Both Parties agree to use reasonable care and diligence to perfotm their respective obligations under this Agreement. Both Parties agree to act in good faith to execute all instruments, prepare all documents and take all actions as may be reasonable necessary to carry out the purposes of this Agreement. Unless hereafter specified, neither Party shall be responsible to perform the Services ofthe other.

1.8 Additional Services.

City shall have the right at any time during the performance of the Services, without invalidating this Agreement, to order extra services beyond that specified in the Scope ofServices or to make changes by altering, adding to or deducting from the Services. No such extra services may be undertaken unless a written order is first given by the Contract Officer to Consultant, which written order incorporates therein an adjustment in (i) the Contract Sum ( as defined in Section

2.1), and/or (ii) the Schedule ofPerformance, ( as defined in Section 3.2), and which written order is approved in writing by Consultant. Any increase in compensation ofup to ten percent ( 10%) of the Contract Sum, or $25,000, whichever is less; or in the Schedule of Performance of up to one hundred eighty (180) days may be approved by the Contract Officer. Any greater increases, taken either separately or cumulatively, must be approved by City Council. It is expressly understood by Consultant that the provisions ofthis Section shall not apply to Services which are specifically set forth in the Scope ofServices or which are reasonably contemplated therein. Consultant hereby acknowledges that it accepts the risk that the Services to be provided pursuant to the Scope of Services may be more costly or time consuming than Consultant anticipates and that Consultant shall not be entitled to additional compensation therefor.

1.9 Facilities and Equipment.

Except as otherwise provided, Consultant shall, at its own cost and expense, provide all facilities and equipment necessary to perform the Services required by this Agreement. City shall make available to Consultant only physical facilities such as desks, filing cabinets, and conference space (" City Facilities"), as City deems, in its sole discretion, to be reasonably necessary for Consultant' s use while consulting with City employees and reviewing records and the information in possession of City. The location, quality, and time of furnishing City Facilities shall be in the sole discretion ofCity. In no event shall City be required to furnish any facilities that may involve incurring any direct expense, including but not limited to a computer, long distance telephone, network data, internet or other communication charges, vehicles and reproduction facilities.

1. 10 Special Requirements.

Additional terms and conditions of this Agreement, if any, which are made a part hereof are set forth in the " Special Requirements" attached hereto as Exhibit B and incorporated herein by this reference. In the event of a conflict between the provisions of Exhibit B and any other provisions of this Agreement, the provisions ofExhibit B shall govern. 3-
249

1. 11 Corrections.

In addition to the indemnification obligations set forth in Article 4, and Sections 1.4, 1.13,

5.3, 5.4, and 6.3, Consultant shall correct, at its expense, all errors in the Services which may be disclosed during City's review of Consultant' s report or plans. Should Consultant fail to make such correction( s) in a reasonably timely manner, such correction( s) may be made by City, and the cost thereof shall be charged to Consultant. In addition to all other available remedies, City may deduct the cost of such correction( s) from any retention amount held by City, or may withhold payment otherwise owed Consultant under this Agreement up to the amount of the cost of correction( s), as provided in Section 6.3.

1.12 Party Representatives.

A. Contract Officer: For the purposes ofthis Agreement, the Contract Officer shall be the City Manager, or such other person designated in writing by the City Manager Contract Officer"). Unless otherwise specified herein, any approval of City required hereunder shall mean the approval of the Contract Officer. The Contract Officer shall have authority, if specified in writing by the City Manager, to sign all documents on behalf of City required hereunder to carry out the terms of this Agreement.

B. Principals and Personnel of Consultant.
1) Consultant Representative: The following principal of Consultant is hereby designated as being the Consultant Representative authorized to act on Consultant' s behalf regarding the Services specified herein and make all decisions in connection therewith:

Name Title
Jeffery Lau, PE,TE, ENV SP Deputy Director ofEngineering It is expressly understood that the experience, knowledge, capability and reputation of the foregoing Consultant Representative were a substantial inducement for City to enter into this Agreement. Therefore, the foregoing Consultant Representative shall be responsible during the term of this Agreement for directing all activities of Consultant and devoting sufficient time to personally supervise the Services hereunder. All personnel of Consultant, and any authorized agents, shall at all times be unaer the exclusive direction and control of the Consultant Representative. For purposes ofthis Agreement, the foregoing Consultant Representative may not be replaced nor may their responsibilities be substantially reduced or reassigned by Consultant without the express written approval of City. It shall be Consultant' s responsibility to assure that the Contract Officer is kept informed of the progress of the performance of the Services, and Consultant shall refer any decisions which must be made by City to the Contract Officer. 2) Consultant' s Personnel: Consultant has, or will secure at its own expense, all personnel required to perform the Services required under this Agreement. All ofthe Services required under this Agreement shall be performed by Consultant or under its supervision, and all personnel engaged in the Services shall be qualified to perform such Services. Consultant shall make every reasonable effort to maintain the stability and continuity of Consultant' s staff and sub- contractors, if any, assigned to perform the Services required under this Agreement. 4-
250
Consultant shall notify City of all changes in Consultant' s staff and sub-contractors, if any, assigned to perform the Services required under this Agreement, prior to and during any such performance. In the event that City, in its sole discretion, at any time during the term of this Agreement, desires to reassign any staff or sub- contractor of Consultant, City shall give notice as set forth in Section 8.1. Consultant shall, immediately upon the receipt of the notice to re-assign staff from City, reassign such person or persons.

1.13 Independent Contractor.

A. Consultant is an independent contractor and not an employee of City.

Consultant shall have no power to incur any debt, obligation, or liability on behalf of City. All Services provided pursuant to this Agreement shall be performed by Consultant or under its superv1S1on. Consultant will determine the means, methods, and details of performing the Services. Any additional personnel performing Services under this Agreement on behalf of Consultant shall also not be employees of City and shall at all times be under Consultant' s exclusive direction and control. Consultant shall pay all wages, salaries, and other amounts due such personnel in connection with their performance of Services under this Agreement and as required by law. Consultant shall be responsible for all reports and obligations respecting such additional personnel, including, but not limited to: social security taxes, income tax withholding, unemployment insurance, disability insurance, and workers' compensation insurance.

B. Consultant shall indemnify and hold harmless City and its elected officials, officers, employees, servants, designated volunteers, and agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials, from any and all liability, damages, claims, costs and expenses of any nature to the extent arising from Consultant' s personnel practices. City shall have the right to offset against the amount of any fees due to Consultant under this Agreement any amount due to City from Consultant as a result of Consultant' s failure to promptly pay to City any reimbursement or indemnification arising under this Section.

1.14 Prohibition Against Subcontracting or Assignment.

The experience, knowledge, capability and reputation of Consultant, the Consultant Representative and employees were a substantial inducement for City to enter into this Agreement.

Therefore, Consultant shall not contract with any other entity to perform in whole or in part the Services required hereunder without the express written approval of City. In addition, neither this Agreement nor any interest herein may be transferred, assigned, conveyed, hypothecated or encumbered voluntarily or by operation of law, whether for the benefit of creditors or otherwise, without the prior written approval ofCity. Transfers restricted hereunder shall include the transfer to any person or group of persons acting in concert of more than twenty- five percent ( 25%) ofthe present ownership and/or control of Consultant, taking all transfers into account on a cumulative basis. In the event of any such unapproved transfer, including any bankruptcy proceeding, this 5-
251
Agreement shall be void. No approved transfer shall release Consultant or any surety ofConsultant of any liability hereunder without the express consent of City.

1.15 Debarment or Suspension.

Consultant represents and warrants that, as ofthe Effective Date ofthis Agreement, Consultant is not debarred or suspended pursuant to any applicable Federal or State law providing for the debarment of contractors. Consultant shall not perform the Services with any subcontractor that has been debarred or suspended pursuant to any applicable Federal or State law providing for the debarment. Consultant and its subcontractors shall not be debarred or suspended throughout the Term of this Agreement pursuant to any applicable Federal or State law providing for the debarment of contractors. If Consultant or any subcontractor becomes debarred or suspended during the Term of this Agreement, Consultant shall immediately notify City.

ARTICLE 2. COMPENSATION AND METHOD OF PAYMENT.

2.1 Contract Sum.

Subject to any limitations set forth in this Agreement, as full compensation for Services satisfactorily rendered, City shall pay Consultant at the hourly rates set forth in the " Schedule of Compensation" attached hereto as Ethibit C and incorporated herein by this reference. In no event shall Consultant be paid more than Thirty-Five Thousand Nine Hundred Fifty-Seven Dollars 35,957.00) (the " Contract Sum"). The Contract Sum shall include the attendance of Consultant at all project meetings reasonably deemed necessary by City. Coordination ofthe performance of the Services with City is a critical component of the Services. If Consultant is required to attend additional meetings to facilitate such coordination, Consultant shall not be entitled to any additional compensation for attending those meetings.

2.2 Method of Compensation.

The method of compensation may include: ( i) a lump sum payment upon completion ofthe Services, ( ii) payment in accordance with specified tasks or the percentage of completion of the Services, ( iii) payment for time and materials based upon Consultant' s rates as specified in the Schedule of Compensation, provided that time estimates are provided for the performance of sub tasks, but not exceeding the Contract Sum or (iv) such other methods as may be specified in the Schedule of Compensation.

2.3 Reimbursable Expenses.

City shall only reimburse Consultant for those actual and necessary expenses expressly set forth in Exhibit C. Reimbursable expenses may include reimbursement for actual and necessary expenditures for reproduction costs, telephone expenses, and travel expenses approved by the Contract Officer in advance, or actual sub- contractor expenses of an approved sub- contractor pursuant to Section 1.14, and only if specified in the Schedule of Compensation.

2.4 Unauthorized Services and Expenses.
6-
252
City will not pay for any Services or reimburse for any expenses incurred which are not specified in the Scope of Services, unless authorized in writing as set forth in Section 1.8 of this Agreement. City shall make payment for such authorized additional Services and expenses in accordance with Article 2 ofthis Agreement.

2.5 Invoices.

Each month Consultant shall furnish to City an original invoice for all Services performed and expenses incurred during the preceding month. Each such invoice shall contain all of the information set forth in Section III ofExhibit C to this Agreement. By submitting an invoice for payment under this Agreement, Consultant is certifying compliance with all provisions of the Agreement. Consultant shall not invoice City for any duplicate Services performed by more than one person.

City shall independently review each invoice submitted by Consultant to determine whether the Services performed and expenses incurred are in compliance with the provisions of this Agreement. City will use its best efforts to cause Consultant to be paid within thirty (30) days of receipt of Consultant' s correct and undisputed invoice, except as to any charges for Services performed or expenses incurred by Consultant which are disputed by City, or as provided in Section 6.3. In the event any charges or expenses are disputed by City, the original invoice shall be returned by City to Consultant for correction and resubmission. Review and payment by City of any invoice provided by Consultant shall not constitute waiver of any rights or remedies provided herein or any applicable law.

2.6 Waiver.

Payment to Consultant for Services performed pursuant to this Agreement shall not be deemed to waive any defects in Services performed by Consultant.

ARTICLE 3. PERFORMANCE SCHEDULE
3 .1 Time of Essence.

Time is of the essence in the performance of this Agreement; provided, however, that the foregoing shall not be construed to limit or deprive a Party of the benefits of any grace or use period allowed in this Agreement.

3.2 Schedule of Performance.

Consultant shall commence the Services pursuant to this Agreement upon receipt of a written notice to proceed and shall perform all Services within the time period( s) established in the " Schedule of Performance" attached hereto as Exhibit D and incorporated herein by this reference.

3.3 Force Majeure.

The time period( s) specified in the Schedule of Performance for performance of the Services rendered pursuant to this Agreement may be extended because of any delays due to 7-
253
unforeseeable causes beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of Consultant. Such unforeseeable consequences include, but are not restricted to, acts of God or public enemy, unusually severe weather, fires, earthquakes, floods, epidemics, quarantine restrictions, riots, strikes, freight embargoes, wars, litigation, and/or acts of any governmental agency, including City, if Consultant shall within ten ( 10) days of the commencement of such delay notify the Contract Officer in writing of the causes of the delay. The Contract Officer shall ascertain the facts and the extent of delay, and extend the time for performing the Services for the period ofthe enforced delay when and ifin the judgment ofthe Contract Officer such delay is justified, subject to the provisions of Section 1.8. The Contract Officer's determination ( or the City Council's determination, in the event the period of enforced delay exceeds the period specified in Section

1.8) shall be final and conclusive upon the Parties to this Agreement. In no event shall Consultant be entitled to recover damages against City for any delay in the performance of this Agreement, however caused; Consultant's sole remedy shall be the extension of the Agreement pursuant to this Section.

3.4 Term.

The Term ofthis Agreement shall be from the Effective Date through May 31, 2026 unless sooner terminated as provided in Article 6 ofthis Agreement or extended as provided in Sections

1.8 and 3.3 of this Agreement. Maximum term and any subsequent amendment or modification shall not exceed five (5) years.

ARTICLE 4. INSURANCE AND INDEMNIFICATION

4.1 Minimum Scope and Limits ofInsurance.

Consultant shall procure and at all times during the term of this Agreement carry, maintain, and keep in full force and effect, insurance as follows:

A. Commercial General Liability Insurance with a mm1mum limit of 1,000,000.00 per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage and a general aggregate limit of $2,000,000.00 per project or location. If Consultant is a limited liability company, the commercial general liability coverage shall be amended so that Consultant and its managers, members, affiliates, employees, agents and other persons necessary or incidental to its operation are insureds.

B. Automobile Liability Insurance for any owned, non-owned or hired vehicle used in connection with the performance of this Agreement with a combined single limit of 1,000,000.00 per accident for bodily injury and property damage. IfConsultant does not use any owned, non-owned or hired vehicles in the performance of Services under this Agreement, Consultant shall obtain a non-owned auto endorsement to the Commercial General Liability policy.

C. Workers' Compensation Insurance as required by the State of California and Employer's Liability Insurance with a minimum limit of $1,000,000.00 per accident for bodily injury or disease. If Consultant has no employees while performing Services under this Agreement, workers' compensation policy is not required; however, Consultant shall execute a declaration that it has no employees.
8-
254
D. Professional Liability/Errors and Omissions Insurance with minimum limits of $1,000,000.00 per claim and in the aggregate.

4.2 Acceptability ofInsurers.

The insurance policies required under this Article shall be issued by an insurer admitted to write insurance in the State of California with a rating of A: VII or better in the latest edition ofthe A.M. Best Insurance Rating Guide. Self-insurance shall not be considered to comply with the insurance requirements under this Article.

4.3 Additional Insured.

The commercial general and automobile liability policies shall contain an endorsement naming City, its officers, employees, agents and volunteers as additional insureds.

4.4 Primary and Non-Contributing.

The insurance policies required under this Article shall apply on a primary noncontributing basis in relation to any other insurance or self-insurance available to City. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by City, its officers, employees, agents or volunteers, shall be in excess of Consultant' s insurance and shall not contribute with it.

4.5 Consultant' s Waiver of Subrogation.

The insurance policies required under this Article shall not prohibit Consultant and Consultant' s employees, agents or sub-contractors from waiving the right of subrogation prior to a loss. Consultant hereby waives all rights of subrogation against City.

4.6 Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions.

Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by City. At City' s option, Consultant shall either reduce or eliminate the deductibles or self-insured retentions with respect to City; or Consultant shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment oflosses and expenses.

4. 7 Cancellations or Modifications to Coverage.

Consultant shall not cancel, reduce or otherwise modify the insurance policies required by this Article during the term of this Agreement. The commercial general and automobile liability policies required under this Agreement shall be endorsed to state that should the issuing insurer cancel the policy before the expiration date, the issuing insurer will endeavor to mail 30 days' prior written notice to City. If any insurance policy required under this Article is canceled or reduced in coverage or limits, Consultant shall, within two ( 2) Business Days ( as defined in Section 8.12) of notice from the insurer, phone, fax or notify City via certified mail, return receipt requested, ofthe cancellation of or changes to the policy.

4.8 City Remedy for Noncompliance.
9-
255
IfConsultant does not maintain the policies ofinsurance required under this Article in full force and effect during the term of this Agreement, or in the event any of Consultant' s policies do not comply with the requirements under this Article, City may either immediately terminate this Agreement or, if insurance is available at a reasonable cost, City may, but has no duty to, take out the necessary insurance and pay, at Consultant' s expense, the premium thereon.

Consultant shall promptly reimburse City for any premium paid by City, or City may withhold amounts sufficient to pay the premiums from payments due to Consultant.

4.9 Evidence of Insurance.

Prior to the performance of Services under this Agreement, Consultant shall furnish the City Clerk with a certificate or certificates of insurance and all original endorsements evidencing and effecting the coverages required under this Article. The endorsements are subject to City's approval. Consultant may provide complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies to City. Consultant shall maintain current endorsements on file with the City Clerk.

Consultant shall provide proof to the City Clerk that insurance policies expiring during the term of this Agreement have been renewed or replaced with other policies providing at least the same coverage. Consultant shall furnish such proof at least two (2) weeks prior to the expiration of the coverages.

4.10 Indemnity Requirements not Limiting.

Procurement of insurance by Consultant shall not be construed as a limitation of Consultant' s liability or as full performance of Consultant' s duty to indemnify City under this Agreement.

4. l l Sub- contractor Insurance Requirements.

Consultant shall require each of its sub-contractors that perform Services under this Agreement to maintain insurance coverage that meets all ofthe requirements ofthis Article.

4.12 Indemnification, Hold Harmless, and Duty to Defend.

A. Indemnification of City.
l) To the fullest extent permitted by law, Consultant shall, at its sole cost and expense, defend, hold harmless and indemnify City and its elected officials, officers, attorneys, agents, employees, designated volunteers, successors, assigns and those City agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials ( collectively " Indemnitees"), from and against any and all damages, costs, expenses, liabilities, claims, demands, causes of action, proceedings, expenses, judgments, penalties, liens, and losses of any nature whatsoever, including fees of accountants, attorneys, or other professionals and all costs associated therewith and the payment of all consequential damages ( collectively " Liabilities"), at law or in equity, whether actual, alleged or threatened, which arise out of, are claimed to arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the acts or omissions of Consultant, its officers, agents, servants, employees, sub-contractors, materialmen, consultants or their officers, agents, servants or employees ( or any entity or individual that Consultant shall bear the legal liability thereof) in the performance of this Agreement, including the Indemnitees' active or passive negligence, except for Liabilities arising 10-
256
from the sole negligence or willful misconduct ofthe Indemnitees as determined by court decision or by the agreement ofthe Parties. Consultant shall defend the Indemnitees in any action or actions filed in connection with any Liabilities with counsel of the Indemnitees' choice, and shall pay all costs and expenses, including all attorneys' fees and experts' costs actually incurred in connection with such defense. Consultant shall reimburse the lndemnitees for any and all legal expenses and costs incurred by lndemnitees in connection therewith.
2) Consultant shall pay all required taxes on amounts paid to Consultant under this Agreement, and indemnify and hold City harmless from any and all taxes, assessments, penalties, and interest asserted against City by reason of the independent contractor relationship created by this Agreement. Consultant shall fully comply with the workers' compensation law regarding Consultant and Consultant's employees. Consultant shall indemnify and hold City harmless from any failure of Consultant to comply with applicable workers' compensation laws. City may offset against the amount of any fees due to Consultant under this Agreement any amount due to City from Consultant as a result ofConsultant' s failure to promptly pay to City any reimbursement or indemnification arising under this subparagraph A.2. 3) Consultant shall obtain executed indemnity agreements with provisions identical to those in this Article from each and every sub-contractor or any other person or entity involved by, for, with or on behalf of Consultant in the performance ofthis Agreement.

IfConsultant fails to obtain such indemnity obligations, Consultant shall be fully responsible and indemnify, hold harmless and defend the lndemnitees from and against any and all Liabilities at law or in equity, whether actual, alleged or threatened, which arise out of, are claimed to arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the acts or omissions of Consultant's sub-contractor, its officers, agents, servants, employees, sub-contractors, materialmen, consultants or their officers, agents, servants or employees ( or any entity or individual that Consultant's sub-contractor shall bear the legal liability thereof) in the performance of this Agreement, including the Indemnitees' active or passive negligence, except for Liabilities arising from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the Indemnitees as determined by court decision or by the agreement ofthe Parties.

B. Workers' Compensation Acts not Limiting. Consultant' s indemnifications and obligations under this Article, or any other provision of this Agreement, shall not be limited by the provisions of any workers' compensation act or similar act. Consultant expressly waives its statutory immunity under such statutes or laws as to City, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers.

C. Insurance Requirements not Limiting. City does not, and shall not, waive any rights that it may possess against Consultant because ofthe acceptance by City, or the deposit with City, of any insurance policy or certificate required pursuant to this Agreement. The indemnities in this Article shall apply regardless of whether or not any insurance policies are determined to be applicable to the Liabilities, tax, assessment, penalty or interest asserted against City.

D. Survival of Terms. Consultant's indemnifications and obligations under this Article shall survive the expiration or termination ofthis Agreement. 11-
257
ARTICLE 5. RECORDS, REPORTS, AND RELEASE OF INFORMATION

5.1 Service Records.

Consultant shall keep, and require sub-contractors to keep, such ledgers, books ofaccounts, invoices, vouchers, canceled checks, reports, studies or other documents relating to the disbursements charged to City and Services performed hereunder (the "Service Records"), as shall be necessary to perform the Services required by this Agreement and enable the Contract Officer to evaluate the performance of such Services. Any and all such Service Records shall be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be complete and detailed. The Contract Officer shall have full and free access to such Service Records at all times during normal business hours ofCity, including the right to inspect, copy, audit and make copies and transcripts from such Service Records. Such Service Records shall be maintained for a period of three ( 3) years following completion of the Services hereunder, and City shall have access to such Service Records in the event any audit is required. In the event ofdissolution ofConsultant's business, custody of the Service Records may be given to City, and access shall be provided by Consultant' s successor in interest (" Consultant' s Successor"). If custody of the Service Records is given to Consultant' s Successor, Consultant shall give written notice to City of the transfer of the Service Records to Consultant's Successor. The notice shall include contact information address and telephone number) for Consultant' s Successor, and access shall be provided to City by Consultant' s Successor.

5.2 Reports.

Consultant shall periodically prepare and submit to the Contract Officer such reports concerning the performance of the Services required by this Agreement as the Contract Officer shall require. Consultant hereby acknowledges that City is greatly concerned about the cost of Services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement. For this reason, Consultant agrees that if Consultant becomes aware of any facts, circumstances, techniques, or events that may or will materially increase or decrease the cost of the Services contemplated herein, Consultant shall promptly notify the Contract Officer of that fact, circumstance, technique or event and the estimated increased or decreased cost related thereto.

5.3 Ownership ofDocuments.

All drawings, specifications, maps, designs, photographs, studies, surveys, data, notes, computer files, reports, records, documents and other materials ( the " Consultant Documents") prepared by Consultant, its employees, sub-contractors and agents in the performance of this Agreement shall be the property ofCity and shall be delivered to City upon request ofthe Contract Officer or upon the termination of this Agreement. Consultant shall have no claim for further employment or additional compensation as a result of the exercise by City of its full rights of ownership use, reuse, or assignment of the Consultant Documents hereunder. Any use, reuse or assignment ofsuch completed Consultant Documents for other projects and/or use ofuncompleted Consultant Documents without specific written authorization by Consultant will be at City's sole risk and without liability to Consultant, and Consultant's guarantee and warranties shall not extend to such use or assignment. Consultant may retain copies of such Consultant Documents for its own use. Consultant shall have an unrestricted right to use the concepts embodied therein. All 12-
258
sub-contractors shall provide for assignment to City of all Consultant Documents prepared by them; and in the event Consultant fails to secure such assignment, Consultant shall indemnify City for all damages resulting therefrom.

5.4 Confidentiality and Release of Information.

A. All information gained or work product produced by Consultant in performance ofthis Agreement shall be considered confidential, unless such information is in the public domain or already known to Consultant. Consultant shall not release or disclose any such information or work product to persons or entities other than City without prior written authorization from the Contract Officer.

B. Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or sub-contractors, shall not, without prior written authorization from the Contract Officer or unless requested by the City Attorney, voluntarily provide documents, declarations, letters ofsupport, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories or other information concerning the Services performed under this Agreement. Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered " voluntary" provided Consultant gives City notice of such court order or subpoena.

C. If Consultant, or any officer, employee, agent or sub-contractor of Consultant, provides any information or work product in violation of this Agreement, then City shall have the right to reimbursement and indemnity from Consultant for any damages, costs and fees, including attorneys' fees, caused by or incurred as a result ofConsultant's conduct.

D. Consultant shall promptly notify City should Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or sub-contractors be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice of deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, request for admissions or other discovery request, court order or subpoena from any Party regarding this Agreement and the Services performed thereunder. City retains the right, but has no obligation, to represent Consultant or be present at any deposition, hearing or similar proceeding. Consultant agrees to cooperate fully with City and to provide City with the opportunity to review any response to discovery requests provided by Consultant. However, this right to review any such response does not imply or mean the right by City to control, direct, or rewrite the response.

ARTICLE 6. ENFORCEMENT OF AGREEMENT AND TERMINATION

6.1 California Law.

This Agreement, and any dispute arising from the relationship between the Parties to this Agreement, shall be interpreted, construed and governed both as to validity and to performance of the Parties in accordance with the laws of the State of California. Legal actions concerning any dispute, claim or matter arising out of or in relation to this Agreement shall be instituted in the Superior Court of the County of Riverside, State of California, or any other appropriate court in such county, and Consultant covenants and agrees to submit to the personal jurisdiction of such court in the event of such action. In the event of litigation in a U.S. District Court, venue shall lie exclusively in the Central District ofCalifornia, in Riverside. 13-
259

6.2 Disputes; Default.

A. In the event that City determines Consultant is in default under the terms of this Agreement, City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any Services performed after the date of default. In addition to the provisions of Section 4.8, and the right to te1minate pursuant to Section 6.7, if the City Manager determines that Consultant is in default in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, City may serve Consultant with written notice of the default. Consultant shall have ten ( 10) calendar days after service upon it ofthe notice in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance.

In the event that Consultant fails to cure its default within such period of time, City may, notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, terminate this Agreement without further notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity or under this Agreement.

B. In the event of termination pursuant to this Section, City may take over the Services and prosecute the same to completion by contract or otherwise, and Consultant shall be liable to the extent that the total cost for completion of the Services required hereunder exceeds the compensation herein stipulated (provided that City shall use reasonable efforts to mitigate such damages), and City may withhold any payments to Consultant for the purpose of set-off or partial payment of the amounts owed City as provided in Section 6.3.

6.3 Retention of Funds.

Consultant hereby authorizes City to deduct from any amount payable to Consultant whether or not arising out ofthis Agreement): ( i) any payment amount ofwhich may be in dispute hereunder or which is necessary to compensate City for any losses, costs, liabilities, or damages suffered by City, (ii) all amounts retained pursuant to the provisions ofSection 4.8, (iii) all amounts for which City may be liable to third parties, by reason of Consultant's acts or omissions in performing or failing to perfmm Consultant' s obligation under this Agreement, and ( iv) all payments due or that become due to Consultant during the period that Consultant or any of its sub-contractors fail to maintain any required insurance in full force and effect, until notice is received by City that the required insurance has been restored to full force and effect and that the premiums therefore have been paid for a period satisfactory to City, as provided in Section 4.9, above. In the event that any claim is made by a third party, the amount or validity of which is disputed by Consultant, or any indebtedness shall exist which shall appear to be the basis for a claim of lien, City may withhold from any payment due, without liability for interest because of such withholding, an amount sufficient to cover such claim. The failure of City to exercise such right to deduct or to withhold shall not, however, affect the obligations of Consultant to insure, indemnify, and protect City as elsewhere provided herein.

6.4 Waiver.

Waiver by any Party to this Agreement of any term, condition, or covenant of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other term, condition, or covenant. Waiver by any Party of any breach of the provisions ofthis Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other provision or a waiver of any subsequent breach or violation of any provision of this Agreement.

Acceptance by City of any Services by Consultant shall not constitute a waiver of any of the 14-
260
provisions of this Agreement. No delay or omission in the exercise of any right or remedy by a non-defaulting Party on any default shall impair such right or remedy or be construed as a waiver.

Any waiver by either Party of any default must be in writing, and shall not be a waiver of any other default concerning the same or any other provision ofthis Agreement.

6.5 Rights and Remedies are Cumulative.

Except with respect to rights and remedies expressly declared to be exclusive in this Agreement, the rights and remedies of the Parties are cumulative and the exercise by either Party of one or more of such rights or remedies shall not preclude the exercise by it, at the same or different times, of any other rights or remedies for the same default or any other default by the other Party.

6.6 Legal Action.

In addition to any other rights or remedies, either Party may take legal action, in law or in equity, to cure, correct or remedy any default, to recover damages for any default, to compel specific performance ofthis Agreement, to obtain declaratory or injunctive relief, or to obtain any other remedy consistent with the purposes of this Agreement. Notwithstanding any contrary provision herein, Consultant must file a statutory claim pursuant to Government Code Sections 905 et seq. and 910 et seq., in order to pursue a legal action against City under this Agreement.

6.7 Termination Prior to Expiration of Term.

This Article 6 shall govern any termination of this Agreement except as specifically provided in Section 6.2 for termination for default of Consultant. City reserves the right to terminate this Agreement at any time, with or without cause, upon thirty (30) days' written notice to Consultant, except that where termination is due to the fault of Consultant, the period of notice may be a shorter time as may be determined by the Contract Officer. In addition, Consultant reserves the right to terminate this Agreement at any time, with or without cause, upon sixty (60) days' written notice to City, except that where termination is due to the fault of City, the period of notice may be a shorter time as Consultant may determine. Upon receipt of any notice of termination, Consultant shall immediately cease all Services hereunder except such as may be specifically approved by the Contract Officer. Except where Consultant has initiated termination, Consultant shall be entitled to compensation for all Services rendered prior to the effective date of the notice of termination and for any Services authorized by the Contract Officer thereafter in accordance with the Schedule of Compensation or such as may be approved by the Contract Officer, except as provided in Section 6.3. In the event Consultant has initiated termination, Consultant shall be entitled to compensation only for the reasonable value of the work product actually produced hereunder. In the event of termination without cause pursuant to this Section, the terminating Party need not provide the non-terminating Party with the opportunity to cure pursuant to Section 6.2.

6.8 Attorneys' Fees.

In any litigation or other proceeding by which a Party seeks to enforce its rights under this Agreement ( whether in contract, tort or both) or seeks a declaration of any rights or obligations under this Agreement, the prevailing Party in such action or proceeding, in addition to any other 15-
261
relief which may be granted, whether legal or equitable, shall be entitled to reasonable attorneys' fees. Attorneys' fees shall include attorney' s fees on any appeal, and in addition the Party entitled to attorneys' fees shall be entitled to all other reasonable costs for investigating such action, taking depositions and discovery and all other necessary costs the court allows which are incurred in such litigation. All such fees shall be deemed to have accrued on commencement of such action and shall be enforceable whether or not such action is prosecuted to judgment.

ARTICLE 7. CITY OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES: NON-DISCRIMINATION 7 .1 Non-liability of City Officers and Employees.

No officer or employee of City shall be personally liable to Consultant, or Consultant' s Successor, in the event of any default or breach by City or for any amount which may become due to Consultant or Consultant' s Successor, or for breach of any obligation of the terms of this Agreement.
7 .2 Conflict of Interest.

Consultant covenants that neither it, nor any officer or principal of its firm, has or shall acquire any interest, directly or indirectly, which would conflict in any manner with the interests of City or which would in any way hinder Consultant' s performance of Services under this Agreement. Consultant further covenants that in the performance of this Agreement, no person having any such interest shall be employed by it as an officer, employee, agent or sub- contractor without the express written consent ofthe Contract Officer. Consultant agrees to at all times avoid conflicts of interest or the appearance of any conflicts of interest with the interests of City in the performance ofthis Agreement.

No officer or employee of City shall have any direct or indirect financial interest in this Agreement within the scope of Government Code section 1090, nor shall any such officer or employee make, participate in making, or use his or her official position to influence, any City decision relating to the Agreement which has a material financial effect on his or her financial interests or the financial interests of any corporation, partnership or association in which he or she is, directly or indirectly, interested, in violation of any State statute or regulation. Consultant warrants that it has not paid or given, and will not pay or give any third party any money or other consideration for obtaining this Agreement.

Consultant and its officers, employees, associates and sub- contractors, ifany, shall comply with all conflict of interest statutes of the State of California applicable to Consultant' s Services under this Agreement, including the Political Reform Act ( Gov. Code § 81000, et seq.) and Government Code Section 1090. During the term of this Agreement, Consultant may perform similar services for other clients; but Consultant and its officers, employees, associates and subcontractors shall not, without the Contract Officer' s prior written approval, perform services for another person or entity for whom Consultant is not currently performing services that would require Consultant or one of its officers, employees, associates or sub- contractors to abstain from a decision under this Agreement pursuant to a conflict of interest statute. Consultant shall incorporate a clause substantially similar to this Section into any subcontract that Consultant executes in connection with the performance of this Agreement. 16-
262

7.3 Covenant Against Discrimination.

Consultant covenants that, by and for itself, its heirs, executors, assigns, and all persons claiming under or through them, that there shall be no discrimination against or segregation of, any person or group of persons on account of race, color, creed, religion, sex, gender, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, or ancestry in the performance of this Agreement.

Consultant shall take affirmative action to insure that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment, without regard to their race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, national origin, or ancestry, or other protected class.

7.4 Unauthorized Aliens.

Consultant hereby promises and agrees to comply with all ofthe provisions ofthe Federal Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C.A. §§ 1101, et seq., as amended, and in connection therewith, shall not employ unauthorized aliens as defined therein. Should Consultant so employ such unauthorized aliens for the performance of Services covered by this Agreement, and should the any liability or sanctions be imposed against City for such use of unauthorized aliens, Consultant hereby agrees to and shall reimburse City for the cost ofall such liabilities or sanctions imposed, together with any and all costs, including attorneys' fees, incurred by City.

ARTICLE 8. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS

8.1 Notices.

Any notice, demand, request, document, consent, approval, bill, invoice, report or other communication required or permitted under this Agreement shall be in writing and conclusively deemed effective: ( a) on confirmed delivery by courier service or overnight delivery service during Consultant' s and City' s regular business hours; or (b) three ( 3) Business Days after deposit in the United States mail, by certified or registered mail, and addressed to the Party to be notified as set forth below:
lfto City
With a courtesy copy to:

Attn: Patrick Safari
City' s Project Manager
City ofBanning
99 East Ramsey Street
Banning, California 92220
Email: psafari@banningca. gov
Serita R. Young, City Attorney
Richards, Watson & Gershon
350 South Grand Avenue, 37th Floor
Los Angeles, California 90071
Email: SYoung@rwglaw. com
17-
263
Ifto Consultant:

8.2 Interpretation.

Attn: Jeffrey Lau
Deputy Director ofEngineering
Willdan Engineering
650 E. Hospitality Lane, Suite 400
San Bemandino, CA 92408
Email: [email protected]
The terms of this Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the meaning of the language used and shall not be construed for or against either Party by reason ofthe authorship of this Agreement or any other rule of construction which might otherwise apply.

8.3 Counterparts.

This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each ofwhich shall be deemed to be an original, and such counterparts shall constitute one and the same instrument. 8 .4 Integration; Amendment.

This Agreement, and all exhibits referred to in this Agreement, constitute the final, complete and exclusive statement ofthe terms ofthe agreement between the Parties pertaining to the subject matter of this Agreement and supersede all other and cancels any and all previous negotiations, arrangements, agreements and understandings, ifany, between the Parties, and none shall be used to interpret this Agreement. No Party has been induced to enter into this Agreement by, nor is any Party relying on, any representation or warranty except those expressly set forth in this Agreement. No amendment to or modification ofthis Agreement, nor any provision or breach hereof waived, shall be valid unless made in writing and approved by Consultant and by City Council. The Parties agree that this requirement for written modifications cannot be waived and that any attempted waiver shall be void.

8.5 Severability.

In the event that any one or more ofthe phrases, sentences, clauses, paragraphs, or sections contained in this Agreement shall be declared invalid or unenforceable by a valid judgment or decree of a court ofcompetent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unenforceability shall not affect any ofthe remaining phrases, sentences, clauses, paragraphs, or sections ofthis Agreement which are hereby declared as severable and shall be interpreted to carry out the intent ofthe Parties hereunder unless the invalid provision is so material that its invalidity deprives either Party of the basic benefit oftheir bargain or renders this Agreement meaningless.

8.6 Mutual Cooperation.

A. City's Cooperation. City shall provide Consultant with all pertinent data, documents and other requested information as is reasonably available for Consultant's proper performance ofthe Services required under this Agreement. 18-
264
B. Consultant' s Cooperation. In the event any claim or action is brought against City relating to Consultant' s performance of Services rendered under this Agreement, Consultant shall render any reasonable assistance that City requires.

8.7 No Third Party Beneficiaries Intended.

This Agreement is made solely for the benefit of the Parties to this Agreement and their respective successors and assigns, and no other person or entity may have or acquire a right by virtue ofthis Agreement.

8.8 Final Payment Acceptance Constitutes Release.

The acceptance by Consultant of the final payment made under this Agreement shall operate as and be a release of City from all claims and liabilities for compensation to Consultant for anything done, furnished or relating to Consultant' s Services. Acceptance of payment shall be any negotiation of City's check or the failure to make a written extra compensation claim within ten (10) calendar days ofthe receipt ofthat check. However, approval or payment by City shall not constitute, nor be deemed, a release ofthe responsibility and liability of Consultant, its employees, sub-contractors and agents for the accuracy and competency of the information provided and/or Services performed; nor shall such approval or payment be deemed to be an assumption of such responsibility or liability by City for any defect or error in the Services prepared by Consultant, its employees, sub-contractors and agents.

8.9 Non-Appropriation of Funds.

Payments to be made to Consultant by City for Services performed within the current fiscal year which are within the current fiscal budget and within an available, unexhausted fund. In the event that City does not appropriate sufficient funds for payment of Consultant' s Services beyond the current fiscal year, this Agreement shall cover payment for Consultant' s Services only to the conclusion of the last fiscal year in which City appropriates sufficient funds and shall automatically terminate at the conclusion of such fiscal year.

8.10 Headings.

The headings in this Agreement are included solely for convenience of reference and shall not affect the interpretation of any provision of this Agreement or any of the rights or obligations ofthe Parties to this Agreement.

8.11 Word Usage.

Unless the context clearly requires otherwise, ( a) the words " shall," " will" and agrees" are mandatory and " may" is permissive; ( b) " or" is not exclusive; and ( c) " includes" or including" are not limiting.

8.12 Business Days.
19-
265
Business Days" refers to days that the Banning City Hall is open for business.

8.13 Corporate Authority.

The persons executing this Agreement on behalf ofthe Parties hereto warrant that i): such Party is duly organized and existing, (ii) they are duly authorized to execute and deliver this Agreement on behalfofthat Party, (iii) by so executing this Agreement, such Party is formally bound to the provisions of this Agreement, and ( iv) the entering into this Agreement does not violate any provision ofany other Agreement to which that Party is bound. This Agreement shall be binding upon the heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns ofthe Parties.

8.14 Electronic Signatures.

Each Party may adopt as its signature an electronic identification consisting of a symbol or code that is affixed to or contained in each document transmitted by such Party electronic signature"). The Parties hereto herby agree that electronic signatures are acceptable, shall have the same force and effect under the law as original wet signatures, and shall be sufficient to verify that the Parties have executed this Agreement and such other documents transmitted by the Parties.

SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE]
20-
266
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the Parties hereto have executed this Agreement the day and year first hereinabove written.

CITY OF BANNING
Robert Fisher, Date
Acting City Manager
ATTEST:

Sandra Calderon Date
Acting Administrative City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

SLOVAK BARON EMPEY MURPHY &

PINKNEYLLP
John 0. Pinkney
City Attorney
Date

CONSULTANT
NAME: Date
TITLE:

NAME: Date
TITLE:

Tax ID No.

Address:

City Council Approval: ____ _
NOTE: PROOF OF AUTHORITY TO BIND CONTRACTING PARTY REQUIRED. APPROPRIATE

ATTESTATIONS SHALL BE INCLUDED AS MAY BE REQUIRED BY THE BYLAWS, ARTICLES OF

INCORPORATION, OR OTHER RULES OR REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO CONSULT ANT' S BUSINESS ENTITY.
21-
267
EXHIBIT " A"

SCOPE OF SERVICES
I. Consultant will perform the following Services in connection with providing OnCall Engineering & Traffic Survey prepared in connection therewith:

II. As part ofthe Services, Consultant will prepare and deliver the following tangible work products and services to City:

Exhibit "A"-1
268
March 11, 2025
City of Banning
Public Works Department
c/ o Barbara Mason, Purchasing Manager
99 E. Ramsey Street
Banning, CA 92220
EXHIBIT " A"
Subject: Cost Proposal for On-Call Engineering and Traffic Surveys RFP- 24- 093
W w1LLDAN
Willdan Engineering appreciates the opportunity to submit our cost proposal to the City of Banning for On- Call Engineering and Traffic Surveys. This fee proposal is valid for a period of 120 days from the date of signing.

Individual billing rates by job classification as well as overall costs for the project are both included . The fee breakdown, on the following page, is a not- to- exceed price; however, it includes two optional tasks .

Total cost with the optional services is $ 35, 957 , without those two tasks, the total is $ 22, 750. The expenses listed are for mileage while doing the field reviews.

Willdan has read and will comply with all terms and conditions of the RFP . If there are any questions regarding our qualifications or this submittal, please contact Nicolle Spann, our proposed Project Manager at nspann@willdan . com .

Respectfully submitted,
WILL
Deputy Director of Engineering
909. 386. 0200 I b50 E. Ho<,pital,ty Lane, Suite 400, San Bernardino, ( A 92408 www. willdan. com
Exhibit " A" - 2 269
Rada r Speed Surveys ( 43 Segments)
Radar Speed Re- Surveys ( 10 Segments)
ADT Data Collection ( 43 Segments)
Field Review
Crash Data Ana lys is
Speed Limit Recommendation Table
Citywide Speed Limit Map
City Or dinan ce Preparation
Prepare Draft E& T Survey Report
Prep ar e Final E& T Surv ey Rep ort
Notes :

CITY OF BANNING
2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY

PROPOSED PROJECT FEE

4.0 1.0 1.0

1.0 5.0 0. 0

1.0 3.0

1.0 1.0 I 2.0 3. 0

12. 0 12 .0

6.0 7. 0
Addrtional E&T Survey Street Segmen ts can be added for an addrtion al $ 460 per location . w Exhibit " A" - 3
20 7. 00
4,300. 00 s
1, 000 .00 s
4, 700 .00 s 5,066. 00
s 2, 199. 00
s 690. 00
Cos t Proposal fo r On- Cal l Engineering
And T raffic Surveys
2 270
III. In addition to the requirements of Parts I and II of this Scope of Services, during the performance of the Services, Consultant will keep City appraised through periodic status reports regarding the performance of the Services under this Agreement as set forth below and in Section 5.2, by the following means:
a. In-person meetings and/or teleconferences.
b. Email updates/ questions to applicant team and City while reviews are underway.
c. Conference calls.

IV. All work product is subject to review and acceptance by City. If the City determines that any work product is unacceptable, for any reason, it must be revised by Consultant without additional charge to City until found satisfactory and accepted by City.

Exhibit " A" -4
271
EXHIBIT " B"

SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS

TERMS FOR COMPLIANCE WITH CALIFORNIA LABOR LAW REQUIREMENTS

1. This Agreement calls for services that, in whole or in part, constitute " public works" as defined in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1 ( commencing with Section 1720) of the California Labor Code (" Chapter 1 "). Further, Consultant acknowledges that this Agreement is subject to (a) Chapter 1 and ( b) the rules and regulations established by the Department of Industrial Relations DIR") implementing such statutes. Therefore, as to those Services that are " public works," Consultant shall comply with and be bound by all the terms, rules and regulations described in l(a) and 1 (b) as though set forth in full herein.

2. California law requires the inclusion of specific Labor Code provisions in certain contracts. The inclusion of such specific provisions below, whether or not required by California law, does not alter the meaning or scope of Section 1 above.

3. Consultant shall be registered with the Department of Industrial Relations in accordance with California Labor Code Section 1725.5, and has provided proof ofregistration to City prior to the Effective Date of this Agreement. Consultant shall not perform work with any subcontractor that is not registered with DIR pursuant to Section 1725.5. Consultant and subcontractors shall maintain their registration with the DIR in effect throughout the duration of this Agreement. Ifthe Consultant or any subcontractor ceases to be registered with DIR at any time during the duration ofthe project, Consultant shall immediately notify City.

4. Pursuant to Labor Code Section 1771.4, Consultant' s Services are subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by DIR. Consultant shall post job site notices, as prescribed by DIR regulations.

5. Pursuant to Labor Code Section 1773.2, copies of the prevailing rate of per diem wages for each craft, classification, or type ofworker needed to perform the Agreement are on file at City Hall and will be made available to any interested party on request. Consultant acknowledges receipt of a copy of the DIR determination of such prevailing rate of per diem wages, and Consultant shall post such rates at each job site covered by this Agreement.

6. Consultant shall comply with and be bound by the provisions of Labor Code Sections 1774 and 1775 concerning the payment of prevailing rates of wages to workers and the penalties for failure to pay prevailing wages. The Consultant shall, as a penalty to City, forfeit 200.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each worker paid less than the prevailing rates as determined by the DIR for the work or craft in which the worker is employed for any public work done pursuant to this Agreement by Consultant or by any subcontractor.

7. Consultant shall comply with and be bound by the provisions of Labor Code Section 1776, which requires Consultant and each subcontractor to: keep accurate payroll records and verify such records in writing under penalty of perjury, as specified in Section 1776; certify and make such payroll records available for inspection as provided by Section 1776; and inform City of the location of the records.

Exhibit " B" -1
272

8. Consultant shall comply with and be bound by the provisions of Labor Code Sections 1777.5, 1777.6 and 1777.7 and California Administrative Code Title 8, Section 200 et seq. concerning the employment of apprentices on public works projects. Consultant shall be responsible for compliance with these aforementioned Sections for all apprenticeable occupations.

Prior to commencing work under this Agreement, Consultant shall provide City with a copy ofthe information submitted to any applicable apprenticeship program. Within 60 days after concluding work pursuant to this Agreement, Consultant and each of its subcontractors shall submit to City a verified statement ofthe journeyman and apprentice hours performed under this Agreement.

9. The Consultant shall not perform Work with any Subcontractor that has been debarred or suspended pursuant to California Labor Code Section 1777 .1 or any other federal or state law providing for the debarment of contractors from public works. The Consultant and Subcontractors shall not be debarred or suspended throughout the duration of this Agreement pursuant to Labor Code Section 1777 .1 or any other federal or state law providing for the debarment of contractors from public works. If the Consultant or any subcontractor becomes debarred or suspended during the duration of the project, the Consultant shall immediately notify City.

10. Consultant acknowledges that eight hours labor constitutes a legal day's work.

Consultant shall comply with and be bound by Labor Code Section 1810. Consultant shall comply with and be bound by the provisions of Labor Code Section 1813 concerning penalties for workers who work excess hours. The Consultant shall, as a penalty to City, forfeit $25.00 for each worker employed in the performance of this Agreement by the Consultant or by any subcontractor for each calendar day during which such worker is required or permitted to work more than eight hours in any one calendar day and 40 hours in any one calendar week in violation ofthe provisions of Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code. Pursuant to Labor Code section 1815, work performed by employees of Consultant in excess of eight hours per day, and 40 hours during any one week shall be permitted upon public work upon compensation for all hours worked in excess of eight hours per day at not less than one and one- half times the basic rate of pay.

11. California Labor Code Sections 1860 and 3700 provide that every employer will be required to secure the payment of compensation to its employees. In accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code Section 1861, Consultant hereby certifies as follows:

I am aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for workers' compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work of this contract."
Date ______ Signature ___________ _
Exhibit " B"-2
273

12. For every subcontractor who will perform work on the project, Consultant shall be responsible for such subcontractor' s compliance with Chapter 1 and Labor Code Sections 1860 and 3700, and Consultant shall include in the written contract between it and each subcontractor a copy of those statutory provisions and a requirement that each subcontractor shall comply with those statutory provisions. Consultant shall be required to take all actions necessary to enforce such contractual provisions and ensure subcontractor' s compliance, including, without limitation, conducting a periodic review of the certified payroll records of the subcontractor and upon becoming aware of the failure of the subcontractor to pay his or her workers the specified prevailing rate of wages. Consultant shall diligently take corrective action to halt or rectify any failure.

Exhibit "B"-3
274
EXHIBIT "C"

SCHEDULE OF COMPENSATION
I. Consultant shall perform the following tasks (" Tasks") at the following rates as attached as Exhibit C-1.

II. Within the budgeted amounts for each Task, and with the approval of the Contract Officer, funds may be shifted from one Task sub-budget to another so long as the Contract Sum is not exceeded per Section 2.1, unless Additional Services are approved per Section 1.8.

III. City will compensate Consultant for the Services performed upon submission of a valid invoice. Each invoice is to include:

A. Line items for all personnel describing the Services performed, the number of hours worked, and the hourly rate.

B. Line items for all materials and equipment properly charged to the Services.

C. Line items for all other approved reimbursable expenses claimed, with supporting documentation.

D. Line items for all approved sub-contractor labor, supplies, equipment, materials, and travel properly charged to the Services.

Exhibit " C" -1
275
EXHIBIT "C-1"

CONSULTANT' S BILLING RATE AND TASK SCHEDULE

CITY OF BANNING
2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY

PROPOSED PROJECT FEE
Tuesda , March 11 , 2025 ---
Crtylratm
SUMMARY TASK 0.pufyDhcD ! enla,~ nglrlnr Aaaluanl Tec:. hnbl~I E1lrmaMdHour1 Eapen•• Counl_.. C,...,, t.dC-=- t eng..,...._ H t:na. wer ( Subcon. uhnl)
lamml~ lllltm: a •
Ta!'.k 1 ProJeCI Managemenl
o 111UO
f<k:k ,ot'f Meermgo ,. o 2.0 , ..

11. 0 0.0 0.0 LO 1, 2U. IO
a~k 2 • Data Collection
R1dl,r Speed StJ. rwys (-' 3 Segrmm(. s) 1 0 30 •. o 4,300 .00 s ... 7" 7.00 1 0 1.0 1,000. 00 s 1,0l1. 00
ADT D« a Cof/ ection f43 S,gmet' lrsJ 1 0 2.0 J.0 C,700. 00 s 11,1111. GO 12 0 12. 0 207. 00 s Z.119. 00
Cr ash Data- Ana/ys,.s 1 0 60 7.0 s s s •. oo

0.0 , z.o 12. 0 27 .0 s 207. 00 s 10. 000. 00 s U, 7n.OO nk 3 Speed Lamn Analy1m; • nd Recornmenda11on
80 1.0 s 1.UZ. 00
1 0 70 8.0 s $ s 771 . 00

0.0 t.O 0.0 7.1 11. D s s s
City Odioot> ce Prapaa1•, oo 1 0 BO 9.0 s s 1.1711. 00 , ..

I.D 0. 0 0.0 ,. o s s s 1,175. 00
Pr•p•re DraN E4 T Sv/Vey Repo, r 1 0 60 2.0 80 17.0 s

1.0 20 1.0 20 6.0 s m .oo
TOTAL( Ta1k11tt1rull CO 330 15.0 290 110 $ 20700 I 10,DOOOO S 22. 76000 Optional Tnti 6 Safaty Conidor
1 1.1 I .. o I 0.0 I u I 1U IS I s Is 1,707. IOI
Dc!lta Coll« r,oo ( 25 Sl! gmer; UJ I I 2D I 80 I BO I 11. 0 I s 12s. oo I s S,200. 00 I S 1,1111. 00 I I I 60 I I 60 I 12. 0 I s I s I S 1,110. ao I
I 1.0 I so I 2.0 I I 14. 0 I s I s I s Z.OIUOI
TOTAL. INCLUDING OPTIONAL TASK ( Tnks 1 thnl 71 8 0 50 0 25.0 57 D 13& 0 $ 332 00 $ 10,000 00 S l5., IS7 00 Exhibit "C -1 "- I
276
EXHIBIT " D"

SCHEDULE OF PERFORMANCE
I. Consultant shall perform all Services timely, and deliver the specified tangible work products to City in accordance with the schedule attached as Exhibit D-1.

II. The Contract Officer may approve extensions for performance of the Services in accordance with Sections 1.8 and 3.3.

Exhibit " D" - 1
277
2025 Engineering and
Traffic Survey Report
October 2025
Willdan Engineering
13191 Crossroads Pkwy N Suite 405
City of Industry, CA 91746
562.908.6200
278

CITY OF BANNING
October 22, 2025
Patrick Safari
CIP Manager
99 E. Ramsey Street
Banning, CA 92220
Subject: Engineering and Traffic Survey (E&TS) – 2025
Dear Mr. Safari:

As requested, Willdan has completed an Engineering and Traffic Survey (E&TS) to justify and update the posted speed limits along 70 street segments in the City of Banning. These segments were last surveyed in 2016 and require an update to comply with limitation set forth in the California Vehicle Code (CVC).

We are pleased to submit the enclosed Report that describes the E&TS procedures and contains recommendations for posted speed limits on the City’s arterial and collector street system. A summary of these recommendations is included in the Analysis. Supporting documentation for each speed zone recommendation is provided in the Appendices.

The Report was conducted in accordance with applicable provisions of the CVC, following procedures outlined in the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices Revision 9 (California MUTCD) dated April 2025, and as required by Section 627 of the CVC. The Report is intended to satisfy the requirements of Section 40802 of the CVC to enable the continued use of radar for traffic speed enforcement.

We appreciate the opportunity to serve the City of Banning and the assistance, cooperation, and guidance afforded to us during the course of this study.

Very truly yours,

WILLDAN
Nicolle Spann, P.E., T.E.

Traffic Engineer
Enclosure
279

CITY OF BANNING
Table of Contents
Introduction........................................................................................................1 Elements Of the Engineering and Traffic Survey.......................................................................................2 Speed Sampling......................................................................................................................................2 Crash History..........................................................................................................................................4 Conditions Not Readily Apparent to Motorists......................................................................................4 Safety Corridors – New from AB 43 .......................................................................................................4 Residence Districts & Local Roads .........................................................................................................4 Survey Conditions...............................................................................................6 Survey Locations........................................................................................................................................6 Data Collection ..........................................................................................................................................6 Speed Data.............................................................................................................................................6 Volume Data ..........................................................................................................................................6 Field Review Data ..................................................................................................................................6 Crash Data .............................................................................................................................................7 Safety Corridor Establishment – New from AB 43 ....................................................................................8 Analysis ..............................................................................................................9 Speed Limit Recommendations.........................................................................10 Recommendation Tables.........................................................................................................................10 Table 1 - Summary of Recommended Speed Limits.............................................................................11 Table 2 - Street Segments with Recommended Speed Changes..........................................................18 Table 3 – Street Segments Maintaining the Posted Speed Limit.........................................................20 Segments with Special Conditions.....................................................................21 Conditions Not Readily Apparent to Motorists.......................................................................................21 Residential Districts.................................................................................................................................23 Business Activity Districts........................................................................................................................25 Safety Corridors.......................................................................................................................................26

APPENDIX A
Street Segment Data

APPENDIX B
Radar Speed Distribution Forms

APPENDIX C
ADT Count Sheets

APPENDIX D
Survey Equipment Used
280

CITY OF BANNING

APPENDIX E
Safety Corridor Factor Weights & Thresholds
Citywide Safety Corridor Table

APPENDIX F
2025 Recommended Speed Limit Map

APPENDIX G
Legislative References
281
2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

CITY OF BANNING
1 Introduction
This E&TS is intended to be the basis for the establishment, revision, and enforcement of speed limits for selected streets within the City of Banning. This E&TS presents recommended speed limits for 70 street segments in the City of Banning. E&T Surveys are required by the State of California to establish intermediate speed limits on local, major, secondary, collector, and arterial streets and to enforce those limits using radar or other speed measuring devices. Historically, these surveys must be updated every 7 to 14 years to ensure the speeds reflect current conditions, and can be enforced per CVC Section 40802.

E&T Surveys are prepared under the direction of CVC Sections 627,22350-22359, and 40801-40803. The CVC also requires that the surveys be conducted based on the methodology required by the California MUTCD Revision 8 (California MUTCD) dated January 2024.

Assembly Bill No. 43 (AB 43), signed in October 2021, has given local agencies more leeway in lowering and maintaining speed limits aimed at enhancing traffic safety. The California Vehicle Code was amended in 2022 and the California MUTCD was amended in March 2023 to implement laws and guidelines with the changes set forth in AB 43. There were three major changes to how speed limits can be recommended under AB 43 as follows:

1. An E&T Survey conducted more than 7 years ago may be extended to 14 years (previously to 10 years) if a traffic engineer certifies that no changes in roadway or traffic conditions have occurred [CVC 40802 (c)(2)(B)(i)(II)].

2. A local authority may establish and designate safety corridors throughout their jurisdiction. The local authority may recommend a speed limit with an additional five mile per hour reduction on segments designated as safety corridors. Local authorities may not lower a speed limit under this section until June 30, 2024, or until the Judicial Council has developed an online tool for adjudicating infraction violations statewide, whichever is sooner. Since the E&TS was completed in March 2025, this report reflects lowering speeds on these designating the roadway segments.

3. If a local authority, after completing an E&T Survey, finds that the speed limit is still reasonable or safe, the local authority may retain the current speed limit or restore the immediately prior speed limit if that speed limit was established with an E&T Survey and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since completion of the traffic survey that established the prior speed limit.

This E&TS was requested by the City for the proper posting of speed limits and to enable the Police Department to utilize radar or other electronic speed measuring devices for speed enforcement. CVC Sections 40801 and 40802 require E&T Surveys that verify the prima facie speed limit before enforcement by such a device is legal. The law further specifies that these surveys be conducted every 5 years. The surveys can be extended to 7 years provided the City’s Police Department(s) have completed a 24-hour radar operator course [CVC 40802(c)(2)(B)(i)(I)].

Posted speed limits are primarily established to protect the public by mitigating the risks posed by reckless and unpredictable driving behavior. The posted speed limits provide law enforcement with a clearly understood method to identify and apprehend violators of the basic speed law (CVC Section 22350). This law states that "No person shall drive a vehicle on a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable or prudent having due regard for weather, visibility, the traffic on, and the surface and width 282
2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

CITY OF BANNING
2 of the highway, and in no event at a speed which endangers the safety of persons or property." The posted speed limit gives motorists a clear warning of the maximum speed that is reasonable and prudent under typical driving conditions.

The basic fundamentals for establishing speed limits recognize that the majority of drivers behave in a safe and reasonable manner, and therefore, the normally careful and competent actions of a reasonable driver should be considered legal. Speed limits established on these fundamentals conform to the consensus that those who drive the highway determine what speed is reasonable and safe, not on the judgment of one or a few individuals. A radar speed study is usually conducted to record the prevailing speed of reasonable drivers.

Speed limits are also established to advise drivers of conditions which may not be readily apparent to a reasonable driver. For this reason, accident history, roadway conditions, traffic characteristics, and land use must also be analyzed before determining speed limits. Speed limit changes are usually made in coordination with physical changes in roadway conditions or roadside developments. Unusually short zones of less than one-half mile in length should be avoided to reduce driver confusion.

The E&T Surveys for the City were conducted in accordance with procedures outlined in the California MUTCD and as required by Section 627 of the CVC. The Code further describes three elements of an E&T Survey:

1. Measurement of prevailing speed based on the 85th percentile rule

2. Accident history on the roadway

3. Roadway conditions and other relevant factors that are not readily apparent to the motorist.

Additionally, it is generally accepted that speed limits cannot be successfully enforced without voluntary compliance by a majority of drivers. Consequently, only the driver whose behavior is clearly out of line with the normal flow of traffic is usually targeted for enforcement.

Elements Of the Engineering and Traffic Survey
The California MUTCD specifies the methodology to be used for completing E&T Surveys. This methodology includes an evaluation of current vehicle speeds, accident history and conditions not readily apparent to motorists. The basic elements of the E&TS are discussed in more detail as follows:

Speed Sampling
Existing vehicle speeds are surveyed by a certified radar operator with a calibrated radar unit in an unmarked vehicle. Speed samples are taken for each segment representing a statistically significant sample of current traffic. This data is then evaluated to identify the distribution of speeds. A key element in the evaluation is the identification of the 85th percentile speed. The 85th percentile speed is the speed at or below which 85 percent of the traffic travels. This threshold represents what is historically found to be a safe and reasonable speed for most drivers based on common roadway conditions. A speed limit is established in the three options below.

Options:
▪ Closest to 85th Percentile Speed – A speed limit is established at the nearest 5-mile per hour increment to the 85th percentile speed.
283
2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

CITY OF BANNING
3 ▪ California MUTCD Option 1 - Reduction using Segments with Special Conditions - For cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require rounding down, the posted speed may be reduced by an additional 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed, in compliance with CVC Section 627 and 22358.5. ▪ California MUTCD Option 2 - For cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85thpercentile speed would require a rounding up, then the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reduction is used. Refer to CVC Section 21400(b).

If the speed limit to be posted has had the 5 mph reduction applied, then an E&T Survey shall document in writing the conditions and justification for the lower speed limit. The reasons for the lower speed limit shall be in compliance with CVC Section 627 and 22358.5.

The following examples are provided to explain the application of these speed limit criteria:

If the 85th percentile speed in a speed survey for a location was 33 mph, the 3 options may be applied as follows:
▪ Closest to 85th Percentile Speed - The 85th percentile speed would round up to the nearest 5- mph increment. The speed limit would be established at 35 mph since it is the closest 5 mph increment to the 33 mph speed.
▪ California MUTCD Option 1 - Reduction using Segments with Special Conditions - The first step is to round up, then the speed limit would be established at 35 mph since it is the closest 5 mph increment to the 33 mph speed. As indicated by this option, this 35 mph established speed limit could be reduced by 5 mph to 30 mph if conditions and justification for using this lower speed limit are documented in the E&T Survey. However, it is best to apply MUTCD Option 2 in these scenarios as it will not require documentation of conditions and justification to lower the speed limit.
▪ California MUTCD Option 2 - Instead of rounding up to 35 mph, the speed limit can be established at 30 mph, but no further reduction can be applied.

If the 85th percentile speed in a speed survey for a location was 37 mph, the 3 options may be applied as follows:
▪ Closest to 85th Percentile Speed - The 85th percentile speed would round down to the nearest 5- mph increment. The speed limit would be established at 35 mph since it is the closest 5 mph increment to the 37 mph speed.
▪ California MUTCD Option 1 - Reduction using Segments with Special Conditions - The first step is to round down, then the speed limit would be established at 35 mph since it is the closest 5 mph increment to the 37 mph speed. As indicated by this option, this 35 mph established speed limit could be reduced by 5 mph to 30 mph if conditions and justification for using this lower speed limit are documented in the E&T Survey.
▪ California MUTCD Option 2 – This option is not applicable to 85th percentile speeds that already round down to the nearest 5-mph increment using the “Closest to 85th Percentile Speed” option. 284
2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

CITY OF BANNING
4 Crash History
Reported crashes reviewed from California Highway Patrol’s Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) electronic crash database are reviewed for each street segment to determine if there is a higher than expected average rate of crashes. A segment that has an above-average crash rate typically suggests conditions that are not readily apparent to motorists.

Conditions Not Readily Apparent to Motorists
Each street segment is field inspected to identify roadway conditions that may not be readily apparent to motorists. A determination is made whether any conditions are significant and warrant the recommendation of the speed limit 5 mph below the basic speed limit.

The Legislature, in adopting Section 22358.5 of the CVC, has made it clear that physical conditions, such as width, curvature, grade and surface conditions, or any other condition readily apparent to a driver, in the absence of other factors, would not be the basis for special downward speed zoning.

Conditions not readily apparent to motorists include the considerations of crash history, poor visibility, and the safety of bicyclists and pedestrians.

Safety Corridors – New from AB 43
The provisions of CVC Section 22358.7, a new section added through AB 43, to additionally lower the speed limit by designating a safety corridor, shall not be applicable until actions required per CVC Section 22358.7 by Department of Transportation and Judicial Council are completed or June 30, 2024, whichever is sooner. Since the E&TS was completed in 2025 on these designated roadway segments, this report reflects lowering speeds using the application of safety corridors.

Data used to determine a safety corridor may be from the most recent E&T Survey performed. The crash data source may include, but is not limited to, California Highway Patrol’s (CHP) Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS). The prioritized subset of safety corridors shall:

1. Identify specific locations with high crash occurrences.

2. Identify corridor-level segments with a pattern of crash reoccurrence.

3. Be able to be stratified by mode.

The total reduction in the speed limit using the nearest 5 mph increment, rounding up, rounding down and using 5 mph speed reduction, plus an additional 5 mph speed reduction for safety corridor designation, shall not exceed 12.4 mph from the 85-percentile speed. Refer to CVC Section 22358.6(e).

Residence Districts & Local Roads
The lawful use of a posted speed limit involves two separate steps:

1. Establishing the Speed Limit Lawfully –Under CVC Sections 22357 and 22358, a posted speed limit must generally be supported by a valid E&T Survey. However, certain situations are exempt from this requirement including:
▪ Residence districts (§ 22352)
▪ Narrow residential Streets (§ 22358.3)
▪ School zones (§ 22358.4)
▪ Senior zones (§ 22352(b)(2))
▪ Business activity districts (§ 22358.9)
285
2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

CITY OF BANNING
5 2. Enforcing the Speed Limit Lawfully – Even if a speed limit is properly established, it must also be enforceable under the CVC’s prohibition on speed traps (§ 40802). Radar may be used only when supported by an E&TS, except in the following locations:
▪ Local streets or roads (§ 40802(b)(1))
▪ School zones (§ 40802(b)(2))
▪ Senior zones (§ 40802(b)(3))
▪ Business activity districts (§ 40802(b)(4))
Within residence districts, a 25-mph prima facie speed limit is designated by CVC Section 22352(b)(1), unless a different speed is determined by ordinance using an E&TS. A residence district is defined in CVC Section 515 as a segment with a residential density greater than either of the following ratios:
▪ On one side of the highway, within a quarter mile, 13 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures; or
▪ On both sides combined, within a quarter mile, 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures.

A residence district may extend longer than a quarter mile if the above density ratio continues.

Local streets or roads, as defined in CVC Section 40802(b)(1), are either functionally classified as “local” on the California Road System Maps or meet all of the following criteria:
▪ Primarily provide access to abutting residential property, ▪ Are no more than 40 feet wide,
▪ Have no more than one-half mile of uninterrupted length, and ▪ Have no more than one traffic lane in each direction.

For a 25-mph prima facie speed limit to be both established and enforceable on a residential street without an E&T Survey, the roadway must qualify as both:

3. A residence district, so that the 25-mph limit is lawfully established without an E&T Survey; and

4. A local street or road, so that the speed limit is enforceable with radar without creating a prohibited speed trap.

All 15 study segments were reviewed against these criteria to determine eligibility for a 25-mph prima facie speed limit without an E&TS. The evaluation worksheet is provided in Appendix C. Two segments qualified as a residence district and therefore may be lawfully posted with a 25-mph prima facie limit without the need for an E&TS. Because the limits were established by statute, speed data did not need to be collected for this study on residence districts.
286
2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

CITY OF BANNING
6 Survey Conditions
Survey Locations
The procedures described below describe the criteria and methods used to survey selected streets within the City of Banning. The specific location of the radar speed survey for each street segment was selected after considering the following:

1. Minimum stop sign and traffic signal influence.

2. Minimum visibility restrictions.

3. Non-congested traffic flow away from intersections and driveways.

4. Minimum influence from curves or other roadway conditions that would affect the normal operation of a vehicle.

Data Collection
Data of existing conditions was obtained including prevailing speed of vehicles, traffic volume, traffic crashes, visibility restrictions, and roadway conditions within the community.

Speed Data
Radar speed measurements were conducted at 70 locations during the months of May and June 2025.

The radar speed distribution forms are in Appendix B. All surveys were conducted in good weather conditions, during off-peak hours on weekdays. The radar unit was operated from an unmarked vehicle to minimize any influence on driver behavior. Typically, a minimum sample size of 100 vehicles or the total samples during a maximum period of 2 hours were obtained for each segment. Traffic speeds in both directions were recorded for individual segments.

Volume Data
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) data was collected at 70 locations during the month of May 2025. The ADT Segment data forms are in Appendix C. All surveys were conducted in good weather conditions on weekdays while school was in session.

Field Review Data
A field review was conducted for each of the selected street segments in the City with consideration for the following factors:

1. Street width and alignment;

2. Pedestrian activity and traffic flow characteristics;

3. Number of lanes and other channelization and striping patterns;

4. Frequency of intersections, driveways, and on-street parking;

5. Location of stop signs and other regulatory traffic control devices;

6. Visibility obstructions;
287
2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

CITY OF BANNING
7 7. Land use and proximity to schools;

8. Pedestrian and bicycle usage;

9. Uniformity with existing speed zones and those in adjacent jurisdictions; and

10. Any other unusual condition not readily apparent to the driver.

Crash Data
Crash data was obtained from the California Highway Patrol’s Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) electronic crash database. For this study, crash data was used from the latest 2 years of reported accidents from April 1, 2022 to March 31, 2025. The crash rates for the 70 segments are expressed in crashes per million vehicle miles (C/MVM). To calculate these rates, 24-hour traffic volumes were collected for each street segment. This information was then entered into the following formula to determine the crash rate:

𝑹 =
𝑪 × 𝟏, 𝟎𝟎𝟎, 𝟎𝟎𝟎
𝒕 × 𝟑𝟔𝟓 𝒅𝒂𝒚𝒔
𝒚𝒆𝒂𝒓
× 𝒍 × 𝒗
C = Number of midblock crashes over time period
R = Crash Rate (crashes/million vehicle miles)
t = Time Period Covered (in years)
l = Length of Segment (miles)
v = Traffic Volume (average daily traffic)
The segment crash rate was then compared to the average statewide crash rate of similar roadways.

The average statewide crash rates were obtained from 2023 Collision Data on California State Highways published by Caltrans.
288
2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

CITY OF BANNING
8 Safety Corridor Establishment – New from AB 43
Safety corridors were established under the guidelines set forth in the California MUTCD. Fatal and severe injury crash data was gathered using UC Berkeley’s Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS) from January 1, 2020 to December 31, 2024.

Weighted factors were established across the roadway network to identify which segments are classified as a safety corridor. The weighted factors for the 70 segments are expressed in factors per mile. This information was entered into the following formula to determine the weighted factor for each segment:

𝑭 =
𝟐𝑻 + 𝟏𝟎𝑺 + 𝟏𝟎𝑺𝑯 + 𝟓𝑷 − 𝟏𝑫 + 𝟏𝑬 + 𝟏𝑽 + 𝟑𝑺𝒁
𝒍
F = Weighted Factor per mile
T = Total Fatal and Serious Injury Crashes
S = Speed Related Fatal and Serious Injury Crashes
SH = Fatal and Serious Injury Crashes Near Schools
and During School Hours (7am- 4pm)
P = Pedestrian or Bicycle Related Fatal and Serious
Injury Crashes
D = DUI Related Fatal and Serious Injury Crashes
E = Segment within a census tract with a
CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Percentile greater than 75%
V = Segment within a census tract with a
population ages 65 and older over 16% and/ or a
population ages 15 and younger under 23%
according to the American Community Survey
SZ = Segment in a School Zone
l = Length of Segment (miles)
The safety corridor established within the 46-mile roadway network within the City of Banning cannot exceed 1/5 of the total roadway network1(9.20 miles) of the City. There were 17 fatal and severe injury crashes observed in the City of Banning within the 5-year study period. The safety corridor network may include at least 25% of fatal and severe injury crashes2. This translates to at least 40 fatal and severe injury crashes in the City’s safety corridor network.

For the City of Banning, any segment with a weighted factor over 5 is considered a safety corridor. This threshold was selected to prioritize segments with fatal and severe injury crashes that includes the most segments designated as a safety corridor as allowed within the constraints of not exceeding 1/5 of the total roadway network.

𝑺𝒂𝒇𝒆𝒕𝒚 𝑪𝒐𝒓𝒓𝒊𝒅𝒐𝒓: 𝑭 > 𝟓
A spreadsheet that identifies the total length of roadways established as a safety corridor, and criteria made to establish safety corridors using the above criteria is provided in Appendix E. Additionally, Appendix E includes a citywide map showing where the established safety corridors are located. 1 Reference CVC 22358.7(a)(1)
2 Reference California MUTCD Chapter 2B.13 - 12t
289
2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

CITY OF BANNING
9 Analysis
Survey data was compiled and analyzed to determine the recommended speed limit in accordance with several criteria contained in The California MUTCD. Some of the criteria used are:

A. The critical speed or 85th percentile speed is that speed at or below which 85 percent of the traffic is moving. This speed is the baseline value in determining what the majority of drivers believe is safe and reasonable. Speed limits set higher than the critical speed are not considered reasonable and safe. Speed limits set lower than the critical speed make a large number of reasonable drivers "unlawful," and do not facilitate the orderly flow of traffic. The “basic speed limit” is the nearest 5 mph increment to the 85th percentile speed.

B. The 10 mile per hour (mph) pace speed is the 10 mph increment that contains the highest percentage of vehicles. It is a measure of the dispersion of speeds across the range of the samples surveyed. An accepted practice is to keep the speed limit within the 10 mph pace while considering the critical speed and other factors that might require a speed lower than the critical speed.

C. The crash rate for each street segment is compared to average crash rates that can be reasonably expected to occur on streets and highways in other jurisdictions, in proportion to the volume of traffic per lane mile. These average crash rates have been developed by the State of California and are considered reasonable for use in the City of Banning.

The Engineering and Traffic Survey Forms, presented in Appendix A, illustrate results of a thorough evaluation of available data and recommend a speed limit for each of the 70 street segments surveyed based on the guidelines for an Engineering and Traffic Survey set forth by the California MUTCD and the CVC. A complete summary of all 70 E&TS recommendations is shown in Table 1. In each case, the recommended speed limit was consistent with the prevailing behavior as demonstrated by the radar speed measurements. Typically, a speed limit in the upper range of the 10-mile pace was selected unless a crash rate significantly higher than expected was discovered or roadway conditions not readily apparent to the driver were identified. Any segments with recommended speed limits 5 mph or more below the basic speed limit are fully explained later in the Segments with Special Conditions section of this report.

The California State Legislature, in adopting Section 22358.5 of the CVC, has made it clear that physical conditions, such as width, curvature, grade and surface conditions, or any other condition readily apparent to a driver, in the absence of other factors, would not be the basis for special downward speed zoning. In these cases, the basic speed law (CVC Section 22350) is sufficient to regulate such conditions. 290
2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

CITY OF BANNING
10 Speed Limit Recommendations
The recommendations contained in this Report are intended to establish prima facie speed limits. They are not intended to be absolute for all prevailing conditions. All prima facie speed violations are actually violations of the basic speed law (CVC Section 22350). This statute states that a person shall not drive a vehicle at a speed greater than is safe having regard for traffic, roadway, and weather conditions. A prima facie limit is intended to establish a maximum safe speed under normal conditions.

Recommendation Tables
Tables 1-3 summarizing the recommendations are referenced below and included in the following pages. The speed limit recommendations have been organized into the following three tables:

Recommendation Table
Total Number
of Segments
Table 1 - Summary of E&TS Recommended Speed Limits 70
Table 2 - Street Segments with Recommended Changes to the Posted Speed Limit 46 Table 3 - Recommended Street Segments Maintaining the Posted Speed Limit 24 291
Table 1 - Summary of Recommended Speed Limits
Street From To ADT
Dist.
(mi.)
Crash
Rate***
Exp.
85%
Speed
10 mi.

Pace
% in
Act. Pace
Posted
Speed
Limit
Rec.

Speed
Limit No. Justification

CITY OF BANNING
8th Street Indian School
Road
1 Wilson Street 0.4 3,615 1.68 0.00 30 36 27-36 67 % 25 Special Condition 8th Street Wilson Street I-10 Westbound
Ramps
2 0.54 8,854 1.68 0.00 30 36 27-36 77 % 30 Special Condition 3 8th Street Lincoln Street Westward Avenue 0.25 2,480 1.68 0.00 NP 40 26-35 59 % 35 Special Condition 4 22nd Street Nicolet Street Ramsey Street 0.25 1,250 1.68 0.00 NP 29 21-30 83 % 25 Special Condition 22nd Street Ramsey Street Lincoln Street 0.25 2,250 0.96 2.44 34 26-35 69 California MUTCD Option 2 to Round Down
5 45 % 30
6 22nd Street Lincoln Street Westward Avenue 0.25 1,031 0.96 0.00 NP 37 25-34 51 % 30 Special Condition 22nd Street Westward
Avenue
Victory Avenue 0.25 106 1.68 0.00 29 23-32 82 California MUTCD Option 2 to Round Down
7 NP % 25
Apex Street Wilson Street Ramsey Street 0.25 1,336 1.68 0.00 34 22-31 72 California MUTCD Option 2 to Round Down
8 NP % 30
Bluff Street Hale Lane San Gorgonio
Avenue
9 2.78 338 1.68 1.46 NP 40 31-40 73 % 40 Closest to 85th Speed 10 George Street 20th Street 8th Street 0.75 608 1.68 0.00 35 35 26-35 80 % 30 Special Condition 2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report 11
*** Crash rate units: Collisions per One Million Vehicle Miles ** 25 mph when children are present
Act.: Actual Crash Rate based on mid-block crashes recorded between January 1, 2022 and December 31, 2024 Exp.: Expected Crash Rate based on the Caltrans 2023 Crash Data on California State Highways Rate * See Segments with Special Conditions Section for detailed justification Recommended Speed Limit Reduction Recommended Speed Limit Increase 292
Table 1 - Summary of Recommended Speed Limits
Street From To ADT
Dist.
(mi.)
Crash
Rate***
Exp.
85%
Speed
10 mi.

Pace
% in
Act. Pace
Posted
Speed
Limit
Rec.

Speed
Limit No. Justification

CITY OF BANNING
11 George Street 8th Street Hargrave Street 1 677 1.68 0.00 30/35 34 26-35 75 % 25 Special Condition 12 George Street Hargrave Street Hathaway Street 0.5 1,099 1.68 0.00 35 37 28-37 76 % 35 Closest to 85th Speed 13 George Street Sunset Avenue Woodland Avenue 0.36 300 1.68 0.00 25 26 21-30 97 % 25 Closest to 85th Speed Gilman Street 8th Street San Gorgonio
Avenue
14 0.5 628 1.68 0.00 25 30 21-30 84 % 25 Special Condition 15 Gilman Street Durward Street Cherry Street 0.5 338 1.68 0.00 NP 27 21-30 95 % 25 Closest to 85th Speed 16 Hargarve Street Repplier Road Hoffer Street 0.5 1,003 1.68 0.00 NP 37 28-37 72 % 25 Special Condition 17 Hargarve Street Hoffer Street Williams Street 0.38 4,315 1.68 0.00 25 31 23-32 81 % 30 Closest to 85th Speed Hargrave Street Williams Street Lincoln Street 0.36 5,865 1.68 0.00 34 24-33 71 California MUTCD Option 2 to Round Down
18 30 % 30
19 Hargarve Street Lincoln Street Westward Avenue 0.25 4,026 1.68 0.00 30 37 29-38 56 % 30 Special Condition Hargarve Street Westward
Avenue
20 Porter Street 0.5 2,100 1.68 0.00 30 40 30-39 65 % 35 Special Condition 2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report 12
*** Crash rate units: Collisions per One Million Vehicle Miles ** 25 mph when children are present
Act.: Actual Crash Rate based on mid-block crashes recorded between January 1, 2022 and December 31, 2024 Exp.: Expected Crash Rate based on the Caltrans 2023 Crash Data on California State Highways Rate * See Segments with Special Conditions Section for detailed justification Recommended Speed Limit Reduction Recommended Speed Limit Increase 293
Table 1 - Summary of Recommended Speed Limits
Street From To ADT
Dist.
(mi.)
Crash
Rate***
Exp.
85%
Speed
10 mi.

Pace
% in
Act. Pace
Posted
Speed
Limit
Rec.

Speed
Limit No. Justification

CITY OF BANNING
Hathaway Street Morongo Road Nicolet Street 0.25 2,782 1.68 0.00 38 28-37 54 California MUTCD Option 2 to Round Down
21 40 % 35
22 Hathaway Street Nicolet Street Ramsey Street 0.25 2,930 0.94 0.00 40 42 29-38 64 % 40 Closest to 85th Speed 23 Hathaway Street Lincoln Street Westward Avenue 0.25 1,080 1.68 0.00 NP 42 29-38 49 % 40 Closest to 85th Speed Hathaway Street Westward
Avenue
24 Porter Street 0.37 651 1.68 0.00 NP 42 35-44 46 % 40 Closest to 85th Speed Highland Springs
Avenue
25 North City Limit Oak Valley Parkway 1 11,751 1.68 0.23 45 50 41-50 64 % 50 Closest to 85th Speed Highland Springs
Avenue
Oak Valley
Parkway
26 Wilson Street 0.71 22,898 0.94 0.08 40/45 46 37-46 66 % 45 Closest to 85th Speed Highland Springs
Avenue
Wilson Street Sun Lakes
Boulevard/1st Street
27 0.74 17,851 0.94 0.00 30 37 29-38 62 % 35 Closest to 85th Speed Highland Springs
Avenue
Sun Lakes
Boulevard
South City Limit 1.19 5,645 0.96 0.00 43 33-42 54 California MUTCD Option 2 to Round Down
28 35 % 40
Highland Home
Road
Gilman Street Wilson Street 0.2 5,263 0.94 0.00 44 31-40 57 California MUTCD Option 2 to Round Down
29 35 % 40
Highland Home
Road
30 Wilson Street Ramsey Street 0.35 2,469 0.94 0.00 40 42 31-40 62 % 40 Closest to 85th Speed 2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report 13
*** Crash rate units: Collisions per One Million Vehicle Miles ** 25 mph when children are present
Act.: Actual Crash Rate based on mid-block crashes recorded between January 1, 2022 and December 31, 2024 Exp.: Expected Crash Rate based on the Caltrans 2023 Crash Data on California State Highways Rate * See Segments with Special Conditions Section for detailed justification Recommended Speed Limit Reduction Recommended Speed Limit Increase 294
Table 1 - Summary of Recommended Speed Limits
Street From To ADT
Dist.
(mi.)
Crash
Rate***
Exp.
85%
Speed
10 mi.

Pace
% in
Act. Pace
Posted
Speed
Limit
Rec.

Speed
Limit No. Justification

CITY OF BANNING
Highland Home
Road
Sun Lakes
Boulevard
31 South City Limit 0.35 530 1.68 0.00 NP 37 29-38 58 % 35 Closest to 85th Speed Indian School Lane 8th Street Hargrave Street 1 612 1.68 0.00 34 25-34 72 California MUTCD Option 2 to Round Down
32 25 % 30
Lincoln Street Sunset Avenue Adams Street 0.75 1,752 1.68 0.00 39 29-38 58 California MUTCD Option 2 to Round Down
33 40 % 35
Lincoln Street Adams Street 8th Street 0.75 2,333 1.68 0.00 48 35-44 55 California MUTCD Option 2 to Round Down
34 45 % 45
Lincoln Street San Gorgonio
Avenue
Hathaway Street 1 6,826 1.68 0.20 43 35-44 60 California MUTCD Option 2 to Round Down
35 45 % 40
Mountain Avenue North City Limit Wilson Street 0.34 2,185 1.68 0.00 38 29-38 81 California MUTCD Option 2 to Round Down
36 NP** % 35**
Nicolet Street Sunset Avenue Sunrise Avenue 0.5 1,625 1.68 0.00 39 30-39 48 California MUTCD Option 2 to Round Down
37 40 % 35
38 Nicolet Street Sunrise Avenue 8th Street 1 1,438 1.68 0.00 35** 31 21-30 64 % 30** Closest to 85th Speed Nicolet Street 8th Street San Gorgonio
Avenue

0.5 1,601 1.68 0.00 34 26-35 70 California MUTCD Option 2 to Round Down
39 35** % 30**
Nicolet Street San Gorgonio
Avenue
40 Hathaway Street 1 997 1.68 1.37 30/35** 35 28-37 69 % 30** Special Condition 2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report 14
*** Crash rate units: Collisions per One Million Vehicle Miles ** 25 mph when children are present
Act.: Actual Crash Rate based on mid-block crashes recorded between January 1, 2022 and December 31, 2024 Exp.: Expected Crash Rate based on the Caltrans 2023 Crash Data on California State Highways Rate * See Segments with Special Conditions Section for detailed justification Recommended Speed Limit Reduction Recommended Speed Limit Increase 295
Table 1 - Summary of Recommended Speed Limits
Street From To ADT
Dist.
(mi.)
Crash
Rate***
Exp.
85%
Speed
10 mi.

Pace
% in
Act. Pace
Posted
Speed
Limit
Rec.

Speed
Limit No. Justification

CITY OF BANNING
41 Omar Street Wilson Street Ramsey Street 0.37 967 1.68 0.00 35 36 22-31 63 % 35 Closest to 85th Speed Ramsey Street Highland
Springs Avenue
Highland Home
Road

0.95 13,660 0.94 0.32 43 34-43 74 California MUTCD Option 2 to Round Down
42 45 % 40
Ramsey Street Highland Home
Road
43 Sunset Avenue 1.1 15,577 0.94 0.24 45 42 33-42 75 % 40 Closest to 85th Speed Ramsey Street Sunset Avenue 22nd Street 0.62 6,962 0.94 0.00 44 34-43 68 California MUTCD Option 2 to Round Down
44 40 % 40
45 Ramsey Street 22nd Street 8th Street 0.87 11,466 0.94 0.27 40 42 32-41 72 % 30 Special Condition 46 Ramsey Street 8th Street Martin Street 0.66 5,554 .94 0.00 25 36 28-37 76 % 25 Special Condition 47 Ramsey Street Martin Street Hargrave Street 0.31 5,554 .94 0.00 25 36 28-37 76 % 30 Special Condition Ramsey Street Hargrave Street Hathaway Street 0.5 5,042 1.68 0.00 39 29-38 65 California MUTCD Option 2 to Round Down
48 40 % 35
San Gorgonio
Avenue
Bluff Street Wilson Street 1 652 1.68 0.00 33 26-35 77 California MUTCD Option 2 to Round Down
49 30 % 30
San Gorgonio
Avenue
50 Wilson Street Ramsey Street 1 2,596 1.68 0.00 25** 30 21-30 59 % 25** Special Condition 2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report 15
*** Crash rate units: Collisions per One Million Vehicle Miles ** 25 mph when children are present
Act.: Actual Crash Rate based on mid-block crashes recorded between January 1, 2022 and December 31, 2024 Exp.: Expected Crash Rate based on the Caltrans 2023 Crash Data on California State Highways Rate * See Segments with Special Conditions Section for detailed justification Recommended Speed Limit Reduction Recommended Speed Limit Increase 296
Table 1 - Summary of Recommended Speed Limits
Street From To ADT
Dist.
(mi.)
Crash
Rate***
Exp.
85%
Speed
10 mi.

Pace
% in
Act. Pace
Posted
Speed
Limit
Rec.

Speed
Limit No. Justification

CITY OF BANNING
San Gorgonio
Avenue
51 Ramsey Street Lincoln Street 0.24 2,369 1.68 0.00 30 25 15-24 82 % 25 Closest to 85th Speed Sun Lakes
Boulevard
Highland
Springs Avenue
Highland Home
Road
52 1.1 4,267 0.94 0.00 35 36 28-37 76 % 35 Closest to 85th Speed Sunrise Avenue Wilson Street Nicolet Street 0.23 898 1.68 0.00 34 26-35 91 California MUTCD Option 2 to Round Down
53 NP % 30
54 Sunset Avenue Walling Drive Wilson Street 1.72 1,340 1.68 0.00 NP 40 34-43 89 % 40 Closest to 85th Speed 55 Sunset Avenue Wilson St Ramsey St 0.45 9,445 0.96 0.00 40 45 34-43 68 % 40 Special Condition 56 Sunset Avenue Ramsey Street Westward Avenue 0.51 2,550 1.68 0.00 35 36 27-36 77 % 35 Closest to 85th Speed Wesley Street San Gorgonio
Avenue
57 Hathaway Street 0.98 360 1.68 0.00 35 34 27-36 88 % 25 Special Condition 58 Westward Avenue Sunset Avenue 22nd Street 0.6 1,226 1.68 0.00 40 45 37-46 55 % 45 Closest to 85th Speed 59 Westward Avenue 22nd Street 8th Street 0.9 1,298 1.68 0.00 40 47 34-43 50 % 40 Special Condition Westward Avenue 8th Street San Gorgonio
Avenue

0.5 2,456 1.68 0.00 38 29-38 71 California MUTCD Option 2 to Round Down
60 NP** % 35**
2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report 16
*** Crash rate units: Collisions per One Million Vehicle Miles ** 25 mph when children are present
Act.: Actual Crash Rate based on mid-block crashes recorded between January 1, 2022 and December 31, 2024 Exp.: Expected Crash Rate based on the Caltrans 2023 Crash Data on California State Highways Rate * See Segments with Special Conditions Section for detailed justification Recommended Speed Limit Reduction Recommended Speed Limit Increase 297
Table 1 - Summary of Recommended Speed Limits
Street From To ADT
Dist.
(mi.)
Crash
Rate***
Exp.
85%
Speed
10 mi.

Pace
% in
Act. Pace
Posted
Speed
Limit
Rec.

Speed
Limit No. Justification

CITY OF BANNING
61 Westward Avenue Hathaway Street East End 0.5 87 1.68 0.00 NP 37 27-36 54 % 35 Closest to 85th Speed Williams Street Sunset Avenue Sunrise Avenue 0.5 1,442 1.68 0.00 39 26-35 61 California MUTCD Option 2 to Round Down
62 25 % 35
63 Williams Street Sunrise Avenue 4th Street 1.25 1,305 1.68 0.84 25 31 22-31 84 % 25 Special Condition 64 Williams Street 4th Street Murray Street 0.3 887 1.68 0.00 25** 25 18-27 91 % 25** Closest to 85th Speed 65 Williams Street Murray Street Hathaway Street 0.93 443 1.68 0.00 25 35 24-33 73 % 30 Special Condition Wilson Street Highland
Springs Avenue
Highland Home
Road
66 0.98 17,016 0.94 0.16 45 47 38-47 68 % 45 Closest to 85th Speed Wilson Street Highland Home
Road
Sunset Avenue 1 16,416 0.94 0.00 48 38-47 70 California MUTCD Option 2 to Round Down
67 45** % 45**
Wilson Street Sunset Avenue Sunrise Avenue 0.5 11,190 1.68 0.00 48 35-44 56 California MUTCD Option 2 to Round Down
68 50 % 45
69 Wilson Street Sunrise Avenue 8th Street 1 6,585 0.96 0.00 40** 48 39-48 64 % 40** Special Condition 70 Wilson Street 8th Street Blanchard Street 1.1 6,521 1.68 0.19 40** 40 31-40 76 % 40** Closest to 85th Speed 2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report 17
*** Crash rate units: Collisions per One Million Vehicle Miles ** 25 mph when children are present
Act.: Actual Crash Rate based on mid-block crashes recorded between January 1, 2022 and December 31, 2024 Exp.: Expected Crash Rate based on the Caltrans 2023 Crash Data on California State Highways Rate * See Segments with Special Conditions Section for detailed justification Recommended Speed Limit Reduction Recommended Speed Limit Increase 298
Table 2 - Street Segments with Recommended Speed Changes No. Street From To Existing New Change

CITY OF BANNING
1 8th Street Indian School Road Wilson Street 30 25 - 5 3 8th Street Lincoln Street Westward Avenue NP 35 PL
4 22nd Street Nicolet Street Ramsey Street NP 25 PL
5 22nd Street Ramsey Street Lincoln Street 45 30 - 15
6 22nd Street Lincoln Street Westward Avenue NP 30 PL
7 22nd Street Westward Avenue Victory Avenue NP 25 PL
8 Apex Street Wilson Street Ramsey Street NP 30 PL
9 Bluff Street Hale Lane San Gorgonio Avenue NP 40 PL
10 George Street 20th Street 8th Street 35 30 - 5
11 George Street 8th Street Hargrave Street 30/35 25 PL 15 Gilman Street Durward Street Cherry Street NP 25 PL
16 Hargarve Street Repplier Road Hoffer Street NP 25 PL 17 Hargarve Street Hoffer Street Williams Street 25 30 + 5 20 Hargarve Street Westward Avenue Porter Street 30 35 + 5 21 Hathaway Street Morongo Road Nicolet Street 40 35 - 5 23 Hathaway Street Lincoln Street Westward Avenue NP 40 PL 24 Hathaway Street Westward Avenue Porter Street NP 40 PL 25 Highland Springs Avenue North City Limit Oak Valley Parkway 45 50 + 5 26 Highland Springs Avenue Oak Valley Parkway Wilson Street 40/45 45 PL 27 Highland Springs Avenue Wilson Street Sun Lakes Boulevard/1st S 30 35 + 5 28 Highland Springs Avenue Sun Lakes Boulevard South City Limit 35 40 + 5 29 Highland Home Road Gilman Street Wilson Street 35 40 + 5 31 Highland Home Road Sun Lakes Boulevard South City Limit NP 35 PL 32 Indian School Lane 8th Street Hargrave Street 25 30 + 5 33 Lincoln Street Sunset Avenue Adams Street 40 35 - 5
35 Lincoln Street San Gorgonio Avenue Hathaway Street 45 40 - 5 36 Mountain Avenue North City Limit Wilson Street NP 35 PL 37 Nicolet Street Sunset Avenue Sunrise Avenue 40 35 - 5 38 Nicolet Street Sunrise Avenue 8th Street 35 30 - 5
39 Nicolet Street 8th Street San Gorgonio Avenue 35 30 - 5 40 Nicolet Street San Gorgonio Avenue Hathaway Street 30/35 30 PL 42 Ramsey Street Highland Springs Avenue Highland Home Road 45 40 - 5 2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report 18
299
Table 2 - Street Segments with Recommended Speed Changes No. Street From To Existing New Change

CITY OF BANNING
43 Ramsey Street Highland Home Road Sunset Avenue 45 40 - 5 45 Ramsey Street 22nd Street 8th Street 40 30 - 10
47 Ramsey Street Martin Street Hargrave Street 25 30 + 5 48 Ramsey Street Hargrave Street Hathaway Street 40 35 - 5 51 San Gorgonio Avenue Ramsey Street Lincoln Street 30 25 - 5 53 Sunrise Avenue Wilson Street Nicolet Street NP 30 PL 54 Sunset Avenue Walling Drive Wilson Street NP 40 PL
57 Wesley Street San Gorgonio Avenue Hathaway Street 35 25 - 10 58 Westward Avenue Sunset Avenue 22nd Street 40 45 + 5
60 Westward Avenue 8th Street San Gorgonio Avenue NP 35 PL 61 Westward Avenue Hathaway Street East End NP 35 PL
62 Williams Street Sunset Avenue Sunrise Avenue 25 35 + 10 65 Williams Street Murray Street Hathaway Street 25 30 + 5 68 Wilson Street Sunset Avenue Sunrise Avenue 50 45 - 5 Total Segments with Recommended Speed Limit Changes = 46 PL= Post Speed Limit Sign
NP= No Posted Speed Limit
2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report 19
300
Table 3 - Street Segments Maintaining the Posted Speed Limit No. Street From To Existing New

CITY OF BANNING
2 8th Street Wilson Street I-10 Westbound Ramps 30 30
12 George Street Hargrave Street Hathaway Street 35 35
13 George Street Sunset Avenue Woodland Avenue 25 25
14 Gilman Street 8th Street San Gorgonio Avenue 25 25
18 Hargrave Street Williams Street Lincoln Street 30 30 19 Hargarve Street Lincoln Street Westward Avenue 30 30 22 Hathaway Street Nicolet Street Ramsey Street 40 40
30 Highland Home Road Wilson Street Ramsey Street 40 40 34 Lincoln Street Adams Street 8th Street 45 45
41 Omar Street Wilson Street Ramsey Street 35 35
44 Ramsey Street Sunset Avenue 22nd Street 40 40
46 Ramsey Street 8th Street Martin Street 25 25
49 San Gorgonio Avenue Bluff Street Wilson Street 30 30 50 San Gorgonio Avenue Wilson Street Ramsey Street 25 25 52 Sun Lakes Boulevard Highland Springs Avenue Highland Home Road 35 35 55 Sunset Avenue Wilson St Ramsey St 40 40
56 Sunset Avenue Ramsey Street Westward Avenue 35 35
59 Westward Avenue 22nd Street 8th Street 40 40
63 Williams Street Sunrise Avenue 4th Street 25 25
64 Williams Street 4th Street Murray Street 25 25
66 Wilson Street Highland Springs Avenue Highland Home Road 45 45 67 Wilson Street Highland Home Road Sunset Avenue 45 45 69 Wilson Street Sunrise Avenue 8th Street 40 40
70 Wilson Street 8th Street Blanchard Street 40 40
Total Segments Maintaining the Posted Speed Limit = 24
PL= Post Speed Limit Sign
NP= No Posted Speed Limit
2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report 20
301
2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

CITY OF BANNING
21 Segments with Special Conditions
This section is meant to further explain the use of special conditions to lower the recommended speed limit lower than the 85th Percentile speed. These special conditions include the following:
▪ Conditions Not Readily Apparent to Motorists
▪ Residential Districts
▪ Business Activity Districts
▪ Safety Corridors
Conditions Not Readily Apparent to Motorists
The following segments surveyed had recommended speed limits that were 5 miles per hour (mph) or more above or below the 85th percentile speed due to conditions not readily apparent to the driver.

Each segment is discussed below.

Segment 2 – 8th Street – Wilson Street to I-10 Westbound Ramps This segment is currently posted at 30 mph and has one through lane in each direction with an ADT of 8,854 vehicles per day. The adjacent land is residential along the 0.54-mile-long segment. The 85th percentile speed is 36 mph, which would normally justify a 35 mph posted speed limit. However, the segment lies within a designated safety corridor, contains multiple uncontrolled crosswalks, and serves a high-density residential neighborhood. These conditions increase pedestrian activity and potential conflicts that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers. For this reason, it is recommended that the speed limit remain posted at 30 mph.

Segment 3 – 8th Street – Lincoln Street to Westward Avenue This segment is not currently posted and has one through lane in each direction with an ADT of 2,480 vehicles per day. The adjacent land is residential along the 0.25-mile-long segment. The 85th percentile speed is 40 mph, which would normally justify a 40 mph posted speed limit. However, the narrow roadway includes hidden driveways, on-street parking, and limited visibility. To account for these special conditions, it is recommended that the speed limit be posted at 35 mph.

Segment 6 – 22nd Street – Lincoln Street to Westward Avenue This segment is not currently posted and has two through lanes in each direction with an ADT of 1,031 vehicles per day. The adjacent land is residential along the 0.25-mile-long segment. The 85th percentile speed is 37 mph, which would normally justify a 35 mph posted speed limit. However, the roadway has multiple hidden driveways and varying cross-section widths, creating conditions that warrant a lower speed. It is recommended that the speed limit be posted at 30 mph.

Segment 10 – George Street – 20th Street to 8th Street
This segment is currently posted at 35 mph and has one through lane in each direction with an ADT of 608 vehicles per day. The adjacent land is residential along the 0.75-mile-long segment. The 85th percentile speed is 35 mph, which would normally justify a 35 mph posted speed limit. However, the corridor includes uncontrolled crosswalks and moderate pedestrian use. To account for pedestrian activity, it is recommended that the speed limit be reduced and posted at 30 mph. 302
2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

CITY OF BANNING
22 Segment 19 – Hargrave Street – Lincoln Street to Westward Avenue This segment is currently posted at 30 mph and has one through lane in each direction with an ADT of 4,026 vehicles per day. The adjacent land is residential along the 0.25-mile-long segment. The 85th percentile speed is 37 mph, which would normally justify a 35 mph posted speed limit. However, the roadway contains hidden driveways and fair visibility. To account for these safety factors, it is recommended that the speed limit remain posted at 30 mph.

Segment 20 – Hargrave Street – Westward Avenue to Porter Street This segment is currently posted at 30 mph and has one through lane in each direction with an ADT of 2,100 vehicles per day. The adjacent land is residential along the 0.50-mile-long segment. The 85th percentile speed is 40 mph, which would normally justify a 40 mph posted speed limit. However, the segment contains hidden driveways, no sidewalks, and fair roadway conditions. It is recommended that the speed limit be increased only slightly and posted at 35 mph.

Segment 40 – Nicolet Street – San Gorgonio Avenue to Hathaway Street This segment is currently posted at 30/35 mph and has one through lane in each direction with an ADT of 997 vehicles per day. The adjacent land is residential along the 1.00-mile-long segment. The 85th percentile speed is 35 mph, which would normally justify a 35 mph posted speed limit. However, uncontrolled crosswalks, moderate pedestrian use, sidewalk gaps, and hidden driveways are present along the corridor. To address these safety conditions, it is recommended that the speed limit be posted at 30 mph.

Segment 47 – Ramsey Street – Martin Street to Hargrave Street This segment is currently posted at 25 mph and has one through lane in each direction with an ADT of 5,554 vehicles per day. The adjacent land is commercial along the 1.00-mile-long segment. The 85th percentile speed is 36 mph, which would normally justify a 35 mph posted speed limit. However, the corridor experiences moderate pedestrian activity and uncontrolled crosswalks, with sidewalk gaps present. It is recommended that the speed limit be posted at 30 mph.

Segment 50 – San Gorgonio Avenue – Wilson Street to Ramsey Street This segment is currently posted at 25 mph and has one through lane in each direction with an ADT of 2,596 vehicles per day. The adjacent land is residential along the 1.00-mile-long segment. The 85th percentile speed is 30 mph, which would normally justify a 30 mph posted speed limit. However, heavy pedestrian use, uncontrolled crosswalks, and hidden driveways are present. To account for these conditions, it is recommended that the speed limit remain posted at 25 mph.

Segment 55 – Sunset Avenue – Wilson Street to Ramsey Street This segment is currently posted at 40 mph and has two through lanes in each direction with a center turn lane, carrying an ADT of 9,445 vehicles per day. The adjacent land is residential along the 0.45-milelong segment. The 85th percentile speed is 45 mph, which would normally justify a 45 mph posted speed limit. However, the corridor includes hidden driveways and is located within a disadvantaged community with vulnerable populations. It is recommended that the speed limit remain posted at 40 mph.
303
2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

CITY OF BANNING
23 Segment 65 – Williams Street – Murray Street to Hathaway Street This segment is currently posted at 25 mph and has one through lane in each direction with an ADT of 443 vehicles per day. The adjacent land is residential along the 0.93-mile-long segment. The 85th percentile speed is 35 mph, which would normally justify a 35 mph posted speed limit. However, the roadway serves a residential neighborhood with moderate pedestrian activity and limited visibility. To account for these conditions, it is recommended that the speed limit be posted at 30 mph.

Residential Districts
The following segments surveyed have been identified as residential districts. These segments’ speed limits do not need to be justified with an E&T Survey and can be posted at 25 mph. The residence district requirements and segment conditions are identified below showing segments that are classified as a residential district by meeting both local road and residential density thresholds.

Segment 1 – 8
th Street – Indian School Road to Wilson Street
This segment is currently posted at 30 mph and has one through lane in each direction with an ADT of 3,615 vehicles per day. The segment is 0.40 miles in length, with a roadway width of 40 feet, sidewalks and driveways on both sides, and adjacent residential land use. The roadway provides direct access to abutting residential property, is less than 0.5 miles in uninterrupted length, and has only one lane in each direction. In addition, the residential density exceeds the California Vehicle Code threshold, with approximately 98 dwelling units per mile along the segment. Because this corridor meets residential district classification criteria, a lower speed limit is warranted. It is recommended that the speed limit be reduced and posted at 25 mph for the above reasons.

Segment 4 – 22nd Street – Nicolet Street to Ramsey Street This segment is not currently posted and has one through lane in each direction with an ADT of 1,250 vehicles per day. The segment is 0.25 miles in length, with a roadway width of 40 feet, sidewalks and driveways on both sides, and adjacent residential land use. The roadway provides direct access to abutting residential property, is less than 0.5 miles in uninterrupted length, and has only one lane in each direction. In addition, the residential density exceeds the California Vehicle Code threshold, with approximately 80 dwelling units per mile along the segment. Because this corridor meets residential district classification criteria, a lower speed limit is warranted. It is recommended that the speed limit be posted at 25 mph for the above reasons.

Segment 11 – George Street – 8th Street to Hargrave Street This segment is currently posted at 30/35 mph and has one through lane in each direction with an ADT of 677 vehicles per day. The segment is 1.00 mile in length, with a roadway width of 40 feet, sidewalks and driveways on both sides, and adjacent residential land use. The roadway provides direct access to abutting residential property, is less than 0.5 miles in uninterrupted length, and has only one lane in each direction. The residential density is approximately 64 dwelling units per mile along the segment, which meets the California Vehicle Code threshold. Because this corridor meets residential district classification criteria, a lower speed limit is warranted. It is recommended that the speed limit be reduced and posted at 25 mph for the above reasons.
304
2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

CITY OF BANNING
24 Segment 14 – Gilman Street – 8th Street to San Gorgonio Avenue This segment is currently posted at 25 mph and has one through lane in each direction with an ADT of 628 vehicles per day. The segment is 0.50 miles in length, with a roadway width of 30 feet, driveways on both sides, and adjacent residential land use. The roadway provides direct access to abutting residential property, is less than 0.5 miles in uninterrupted length, and has only one lane in each direction. The residential density is approximately 64 dwelling units per mile along the segment, which satisfies the California Vehicle Code requirement. Because this corridor meets residential district classification criteria, the current lower speed limit is warranted. It is recommended that the speed limit remain posted at 25 mph for the above reasons.

Segment 16 – Hargrave Street – Repplier Road to Hoffer Street This segment is not currently posted and has one through lane in each direction with an ADT of 1,003 vehicles per day. The segment is 0.50 miles in length, with a roadway width of 40 feet, sidewalks and driveways on both sides, and adjacent residential land use. The roadway provides direct access to abutting residential property, is less than 0.5 miles in uninterrupted length, and has only one lane in each direction. The residential density is approximately 72 dwelling units per mile along the segment, which exceeds the California Vehicle Code threshold. Because this corridor meets residential district classification criteria, a lower speed limit is warranted. It is recommended that the speed limit be posted at 25 mph for the above reasons.

Segment 57 – Wesley Street – San Gorgonio Avenue to Hathaway Street This segment is currently posted at 35 mph and has one through lane in each direction with an ADT of 360 vehicles per day. The segment is 0.98 miles in length, with a roadway width of 36 feet, sidewalks and driveways on both sides, and adjacent residential land use. The roadway provides direct access to abutting residential property, is less than 0.5 miles in uninterrupted length, and has only one lane in each direction. The residential density is approximately 64 dwelling units per mile along the segment, meeting the California Vehicle Code threshold. Because this corridor meets residential district classification criteria, a lower speed limit is warranted. It is recommended that the speed limit be reduced and posted at 25 mph for the above reasons.

Segment 63 – Williams Street – Sunrise Avenue to 4th Street This segment is currently posted at 25 mph and has one through lane in each direction with an ADT of 1,305 vehicles per day. The segment is 1.25 miles in length, with a roadway width of 40 feet, sidewalks and driveways on both sides, and adjacent residential land use. The roadway provides direct access to abutting residential property, is less than 0.5 miles in uninterrupted length, and has only one lane in each direction. The residential density is approximately 75 dwelling units per mile along the segment, exceeding the California Vehicle Code threshold. Because this corridor meets residential district classification criteria, the current lower speed limit is warranted. It is recommended that the speed limit remain posted at 25 mph for the above reasons.
305
2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

CITY OF BANNING
25 Business Activity Districts
The following segment surveyed has been identified as a business activity district. The business activity district requirements and segment conditions are identified below showing segment is classified as a business activity district.

Segment 46 – Ramsey Street – 8
th Street to Martin Street
This segment is currently posted at 25 mph and has one through lane in each direction with an ADT of 5,554 vehicles per day. The adjacent land is commercial and civic center uses along the 1.00-mile-long segment.

There are marked parallel parking spaces located alongside the roadway and there are two marked uncontrolled crosswalks. This segment qualifies as a business activity district using the following guidelines as identified in CVC 22358.9. This segment does not need to be included in future E&T Studies as a prima facie 25 mph speed limit should be posted for being in a business activity district.

Business Activity District Definition Segment 46 Conditions Meets all of the following 2 requirements: Yes
Maximum of four traffic lanes 2 Lanes
Maximum posted 30 mph speed limit immediately prior and after the business activity district (when establishing a 25 mph speed limit)
Segment 45- 30 mph
Segment 47- 30 mph
Meets 3 of the following 4 requirements: Yes
No less than 50% of contiguous property fronting the highway consists of retail or dining commercial uses that open directly onto sidewalk adjacent to the highway
Yes
Parking, including parallel, diagonal, or perpendicular spaces located alongside the highway
Yes
Traffic control signals regulating traffic flow on the highway, located at intervals of no more than 600 feet
No
Marked crosswalks not controlled by a traffic control device. Yes Business Activity District Requirements Met Yes
306
2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

CITY OF BANNING
26 Safety Corridors
Using CVC Section 22358.7, if a local authority, after completing an engineering and traffic survey, finds that the speed limit is still more than is reasonable or safe, the local authority may, by ordinance, determine and declare a prima facie speed limit that has been reduced an additional five miles per hour if the portion of the highway has been designated as a safety corridor. The following segments used the additional 5-mph reduction.

Segment 45 – Ramsey Street – 22nd Street to 8th Street
This segment is currently posted at 40 mph and has two through lanes in each direction with a center two-way left-turn lane and bike lanes, carrying an ADT of 11,466 vehicles per day. The adjacent land is commercial along the 0.87-mile-long segment. The 85th percentile speed is 42 mph and would normally justify a 40 mph posted speed limit. However, due to uncontrolled crosswalks, moderate pedestrian use, and its designation as a safety corridor, a lower speed limit is prudent. An additional 5 mph reduction is applied because of the safety corridor designation. It is recommended that the speed limit be posted at 30 mph for the above reasons. This recommendation falls within the limitations requiring the recommendation be no more than 12.4 mph under the 85th percentile speed.

Segment 59 – Westward Avenue – 22nd Street to 8th Street This segment is currently posted at 40 mph and has one through lane in each direction with an ADT of 1,298 vehicles per day. The adjacent land is residential along the 0.90-mile-long segment. The 85th percentile speed is 47 mph and would normally justify a 45 mph posted speed limit. However, the corridor is designated as a safety corridor. An additional 5 mph reduction is applied due to the safety corridor designation. It is recommended that the speed limit remain posted at 40 mph for the above reasons. This recommendation falls within the limitations requiring the recommendation be no more than 12.4 mph under the 85th percentile speed.

Segment 69 – Wilson Street – Sunrise Avenue to 8th Street This segment is currently posted at 40 mph and has two through lanes in each direction with a center two-way left-turn lane, carrying an ADT of 6,585 vehicles per day. The adjacent land is residential and includes schools along the 1.00-mile-long segment. The 85th percentile speed is 48 mph and would normally justify a 40 mph posted speed limit by rounding down to the nearest 5-mph interval using the California MUTCD Option 2. However, the corridor is designated as a safety corridor. An additional 5 mph reduction is applied due to the safety corridor designation. It is recommended that the speed limit remain posted at 40 mph for the above reasons. This recommendation falls within the limitations requiring the recommendation be no more than 12.4 mph under the 85th percentile speed. 307
2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

CITY OF BANNING

APPENDIX A
Street Segment Data
308
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 1

CITY OF BANNING
Date of Speed Survey 5/13/2025
Time of Speed Survey 10:20 AM
85th Percentile Speed 36
50th Percentile Speed 31
10 mph Pace 27-36
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 67
Posted Speed Limit 30
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68 Crash Rate 0.00
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Length of Segment 0.40
Sidewalks Both Sides
Driveways Both Sides
Width 40
Adjacent Land Use Residential
Field Study By LA Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Banning was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 25
Residential District
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
10/22/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 105
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 3,615
Number of Lanes 2
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Date of ADT 5/8/2025
Date Range 2/1/2022-1/31/2025
STREET 8th Street
FROM Indian School Road TO Wilson Street
CERTIFICATION DATE 10/22/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Light
Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Fair
Roadway Conditions Fair
Lighting Both Sides
2016 ET Speed Limit mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
This Segment is a Designated Safety Corridor
Type of Traffic Control AWS @ Gilman, Wilson
%
Total 1
Speed Related 0
DUI 0
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 0
Disadvantaged Community NO
School Zone NO
Vulnerable Populations NO
Safety Factor per mile 5
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
309
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 2

CITY OF BANNING
Date of Speed Survey 5/13/2025
Time of Speed Survey 9:55 AM
85th Percentile Speed 36
50th Percentile Speed 32
10 mph Pace 27-36
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 77
Posted Speed Limit 30
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68 Crash Rate 0.00
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Length of Segment 0.54
Sidewalks Both Sides
Driveways Both Sides
Width 42
Adjacent Land Use Residential
Field Study By LA Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Banning was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 30
Uncontrolled crosswalks, high residential density
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
10/22/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 109
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 8,854
Number of Lanes 2
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks @ George, William
Date of ADT 5/8/2025
Date Range 2/1/2022-1/31/2025
STREET 8th Street
FROM Wilson Street TO I-10 Westbound Ramps
CERTIFICATION DATE 10/22/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Light
Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Fair
Roadway Conditions Good
Lighting Both Sides
2016 ET Speed Limit mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
Type of Traffic Control AWS @ Wilson, Nicolet; TS @ Ramsey %
Total 1
Speed Related 0
DUI 0
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 0
Disadvantaged Community YES
School Zone NO
Vulnerable Populations NO
Safety Factor per mile 4.70
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
310
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 3

CITY OF BANNING
Date of Speed Survey 5/13/2025
Time of Speed Survey 9:00 AM
85th Percentile Speed 40
50th Percentile Speed 32
10 mph Pace 26-35
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 59
Posted Speed Limit NP
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68 Crash Rate 0.00
On-Street Parking East Side Only
Length of Segment 0.25
Sidewalks East Side Only
Driveways East Side Only
Width 24/30
Adjacent Land Use Residential
Field Study By LA Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Banning was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 35
Hidden Driveways
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
10/22/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 105
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 2,480
Number of Lanes 2
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Date of ADT 5/8/2025
Date Range 2/1/2022-1/31/2025
STREET 8th Street
FROM Lincoln Street TO Westward Avenue
CERTIFICATION DATE 10/22/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Light
Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Fair
Roadway Conditions Fair
Lighting None
2016 ET Speed Limit mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
Type of Traffic Control AWS @ Lincoln, Westward
%
Total 0
Speed Related 0
DUI 0
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 0
Disadvantaged Community NO
School Zone NO
Vulnerable Populations NO
Safety Factor per mile 0
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
311
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 4

CITY OF BANNING
Date of Speed Survey 5/14/2025
Time of Speed Survey 1:15 PM
85th Percentile Speed 29
50th Percentile Speed 25
10 mph Pace 21-30
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 83
Posted Speed Limit NP
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68 Crash Rate 0.00
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Length of Segment 0.25
Sidewalks Both Sides
Driveways Both Sides
Width 40
Adjacent Land Use Residential
Field Study By LA Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Banning was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 25
Residential District
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
10/22/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 103
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 1,250
Number of Lanes 2
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Date of ADT 5/8/2025
Date Range 2/1/2022-1/31/2025
STREET 22nd Street
FROM Nicolet Street TO Ramsey Street
CERTIFICATION DATE 10/22/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Light
Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve Yes
Visibility Fair
Roadway Conditions Fair
Lighting West Side Only
2016 ET Speed Limit mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
Type of Traffic Control TS @ Ramsey; Stop @ Williams; AWS @ Nicolet %
Total 0
Speed Related 0
DUI 0
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 0
Disadvantaged Community YES
School Zone NO
Vulnerable Populations NO
Safety Factor per mile 1
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
312
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 5

CITY OF BANNING
Date of Speed Survey 5/14/2025
Time of Speed Survey 12:10 PM
85th Percentile Speed 34
50th Percentile Speed 29
10 mph Pace 26-35
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 69
Posted Speed Limit 45
Total Crashes 1
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.96 Crash Rate 1.62
On-Street Parking None
Length of Segment 0.25
Sidewalks Both Sides
Driveways Both Sides
Width 60
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Railroad
Field Study By LA Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Banning was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 30
California MUTCD Option 2
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
10/22/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 104
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 2,250
Number of Lanes 4 + TWLTL
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Date of ADT 5/8/2025
Date Range 2/1/2022-1/31/2025
STREET 22nd Street
FROM Ramsey Street TO Lincoln Street
CERTIFICATION DATE 10/22/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Light
Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve Yes
Visibility Fair
Roadway Conditions Fair
Lighting Both Sides
2016 ET Speed Limit mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
Type of Traffic Control AWS @ Lincoln; TS @ Ramsey
%
Total 0
Speed Related 0
DUI 0
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 0
Disadvantaged Community NO
School Zone NO
Vulnerable Populations NO
Safety Factor per mile 0
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
313
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 6

CITY OF BANNING
Date of Speed Survey 5/14/2025
Time of Speed Survey 11:03 AM
85th Percentile Speed 37
50th Percentile Speed 29
10 mph Pace 25-34
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 51
Posted Speed Limit NP
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.96 Crash Rate 0.00
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Length of Segment 0.25
Sidewalks None
Driveways Both Sides
Width 62/45
Adjacent Land Use Residential
Field Study By LA Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Banning was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 30
Hidden Driveways
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
10/22/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 53
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 1,031
Number of Lanes 4 Lanes
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Date of ADT 5/8/2025
Date Range 2/1/2022-1/31/2025
STREET 22nd Street
FROM Lincoln Street TO Westward Avenue
CERTIFICATION DATE 10/22/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Light
Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Fair
Roadway Conditions Fair
Lighting Both Sides
2016 ET Speed Limit mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
Type of Traffic Control AWS @ Lincoln, Westward
%
Total 0
Speed Related 0
DUI 0
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 0
Disadvantaged Community NO
School Zone NO
Vulnerable Populations NO
Safety Factor per mile 0
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
314
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 7

CITY OF BANNING
Date of Speed Survey 5/14/2025
Time of Speed Survey 9:00 AM
85th Percentile Speed 29
50th Percentile Speed 27
10 mph Pace 23-32
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 82
Posted Speed Limit NP
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68 Crash Rate 0.00
On-Street Parking East Side Only
Length of Segment 0.25
Sidewalks None
Driveways East Side Only
Width 26
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Farm
Field Study By LA Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Banning was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 25
California MUTCD Option 2
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
10/22/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 11
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 106
Number of Lanes 2
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Date of ADT 5/8/2025
Date Range 2/1/2022-1/31/2025
STREET 22nd Street
FROM Westward Avenue TO Victory Avenue
CERTIFICATION DATE 10/22/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Light
Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve Yes
Visibility Fair
Roadway Conditions Fair
Lighting Both Sides
2016 ET Speed Limit mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
Type of Traffic Control AWS @ Westward
%
Total 0
Speed Related 0
DUI 0
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 0
Disadvantaged Community YES
School Zone NO
Vulnerable Populations YES
Safety Factor per mile 2
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
315
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 8

CITY OF BANNING
Date of Speed Survey 5/30/2025
Time of Speed Survey 8:00 AM
85th Percentile Speed 34
50th Percentile Speed 27
10 mph Pace 22-31
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 72
Posted Speed Limit NP
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68 Crash Rate 0.00
On-Street Parking East Side Only
Length of Segment 0.25
Sidewalks Both Sides
Driveways Few
Width 42
Adjacent Land Use Residential
Field Study By LA Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Banning was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 30
California MUTCD Option 2
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
10/22/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 78
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 1,336
Number of Lanes 2
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Date of ADT 5/8/2025
Date Range 2/1/2022-1/31/2025
STREET Apex Street
FROM Wilson Street TO Ramsey Street
CERTIFICATION DATE 10/22/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Light
Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Fair
Roadway Conditions Fair
Lighting None
2016 ET Speed Limit mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
Type of Traffic Control Stop @ Ramsey; TS @ Wilson
%
Total 0
Speed Related 0
DUI 0
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 0
Disadvantaged Community NO
School Zone NO
Vulnerable Populations YES
Safety Factor per mile 1
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
316
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 9

CITY OF BANNING
Date of Speed Survey 5/28/2025
Time of Speed Survey 7:30 AM
85th Percentile Speed 40
50th Percentile Speed 36
10 mph Pace 31-40
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 73
Posted Speed Limit NP
Total Crashes 1
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68 Crash Rate 0.97
On-Street Parking None
Length of Segment 2.78
Sidewalks None
Driveways North Side Only
Width 24
Adjacent Land Use Mountain, Residential @ North Side
Field Study By LA Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Banning was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 40
Closest to 85th Speed
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
10/22/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 22
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 338
Number of Lanes 2
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Date of ADT 5/20/2025
Date Range 2/1/2022-1/31/2025
STREET Bluff Street
FROM Hale Lane TO San Gorgonio Avenue
CERTIFICATION DATE 10/22/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Light
Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve Yes
Visibility Fair
Roadway Conditions Poor
Lighting None
2016 ET Speed Limit mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
Type of Traffic Control None
%
Total 1
Speed Related 1
DUI 0
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 0
Disadvantaged Community NO
School Zone NO
Vulnerable Populations NO
Safety Factor per mile 4.31
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
317
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 10

CITY OF BANNING
Date of Speed Survey 5/28/2025
Time of Speed Survey 12:20 PM
85th Percentile Speed 35
50th Percentile Speed 31
10 mph Pace 26-35
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 80
Posted Speed Limit 35
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68 Crash Rate 0.00
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Length of Segment 0.75
Sidewalks North Sides Only
Driveways Both Sides
Width 36
Adjacent Land Use Residential
Field Study By LA Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Banning was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 30
Uncontrolled Crosswalks, Moderate Pedestrian Use
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
10/22/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 56
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 608
Number of Lanes 2
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks @ 10th
Date of ADT 5/13/2025
Date Range 2/1/2022-1/31/2025
STREET George Street
FROM 20th Street TO 8th Street
CERTIFICATION DATE 10/22/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Moderate
Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Fair
Roadway Conditions Fair
Lighting Both Sides
2016 ET Speed Limit mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
Type of Traffic Control Stop @ 20th, 8th
%
Total 0
Speed Related 0
DUI 0
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 0
Disadvantaged Community NO
School Zone NO
Vulnerable Populations NO
Safety Factor per mile 0
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
318
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 11

CITY OF BANNING
Date of Speed Survey 5/28/2025
Time of Speed Survey 2:10 PM
85th Percentile Speed 34
50th Percentile Speed 29
10 mph Pace 26-35
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 75
Posted Speed Limit 30/35
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68 Crash Rate 0.00
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Length of Segment 1.00
Sidewalks South Side Only
Driveways Both Sides
Width 40
Adjacent Land Use Residential
Field Study By LA Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Banning was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 25
Residential District
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
10/22/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 61
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 677
Number of Lanes 2
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Date of ADT 5/13/2025
Date Range 2/1/2022-1/31/2025
STREET George Street
FROM 8th Street TO Hargrave Street
CERTIFICATION DATE 10/22/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Light
Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Fair
Roadway Conditions Fair
Lighting Both Sides
2016 ET Speed Limit mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
Type of Traffic Control Stop @ Hargrave, 8th
%
Total 0
Speed Related 0
DUI 0
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 0
Disadvantaged Community YES
School Zone NO
Vulnerable Populations NO
Safety Factor per mile 1
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
319
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 12

CITY OF BANNING
Date of Speed Survey 5/28/2025
Time of Speed Survey 3:17 PM
85th Percentile Speed 37
50th Percentile Speed 32
10 mph Pace 28-37
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 76
Posted Speed Limit 35
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68 Crash Rate 0.00
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Length of Segment 0.50
Sidewalks North Side Only
Driveways Both Sides
Width 38
Adjacent Land Use Residential
Field Study By LA Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Banning was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 35
Closest to 85th Speed
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
10/22/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 75
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 1,099
Number of Lanes 2
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Date of ADT 5/13/2025
Date Range 2/1/2022-1/31/2025
STREET George Street
FROM Hargrave Street TO Hathaway Street
CERTIFICATION DATE 10/22/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Light
Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Fair
Roadway Conditions Good
Lighting South Side Only
2016 ET Speed Limit mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
Type of Traffic Control Stop @ Hargrave, San Gorgonio, Allesandro %
Total 0
Speed Related 0
DUI 0
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 0
Disadvantaged Community YES
School Zone NO
Vulnerable Populations NO
Safety Factor per mile 1
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
320
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 13

CITY OF BANNING
Date of Speed Survey 5/30/2025
Time of Speed Survey 12:40 PM
85th Percentile Speed 26
50th Percentile Speed 25
10 mph Pace 21-30
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 97
Posted Speed Limit 25
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68 Crash Rate 0.00
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Length of Segment 0.36
Sidewalks South Side Only
Driveways Both Sides
Width 50
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Park
Field Study By LA Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Banning was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 25
Closest to 85th Speed
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
10/22/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 30
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 300
Number of Lanes 2
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Date of ADT 5/13/2025
Date Range 2/1/2022-1/31/2025
STREET George Street
FROM Sunset Avenue TO Woodland Avenue
CERTIFICATION DATE 10/22/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Light
Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Fair
Roadway Conditions Good
Lighting North Side Only
2016 ET Speed Limit mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
Type of Traffic Control Stop @ Sunset, Woodland
%
Total 0
Speed Related 0
DUI 0
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 0
Disadvantaged Community NO
School Zone NO
Vulnerable Populations NO
Safety Factor per mile 0
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
321
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 14

CITY OF BANNING
Date of Speed Survey 5/28/2025
Time of Speed Survey 10:45 AM
85th Percentile Speed 30
50th Percentile Speed 26
10 mph Pace 21-30
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 84
Posted Speed Limit 25
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68 Crash Rate 0.00
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Length of Segment 0.50
Sidewalks None
Driveways Both Sides
Width 30
Adjacent Land Use Residential
Field Study By LA Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Banning was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 25
Residential District
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
10/22/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 57
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 628
Number of Lanes 2
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Date of ADT 5/20/2025
Date Range 2/1/2022-1/31/2025
STREET Gilman Street
FROM 8th Street TO San Gorgonio Avenue
CERTIFICATION DATE 10/22/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Light
Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Fair
Roadway Conditions Fair
Lighting South Side Only
2016 ET Speed Limit mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
Type of Traffic Control AWS @ 8th, 4th, San Gorgonio
%
Total 0
Speed Related 0
DUI 0
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 0
Disadvantaged Community NO
School Zone NO
Vulnerable Populations NO
Safety Factor per mile 0
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
322
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 15

CITY OF BANNING
Date of Speed Survey 6/2/2025
Time of Speed Survey 9:10 AM
85th Percentile Speed 27
50th Percentile Speed 24
10 mph Pace 21-30
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 95
Posted Speed Limit NP
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68 Crash Rate 0.00
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Length of Segment 0.50
Sidewalks None
Driveways Both Sides
Width 36
Adjacent Land Use Residential
Field Study By LA Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Banning was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 25
Closest to 85th Speed
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
10/22/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 41
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 338
Number of Lanes 2
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Date of ADT 5/20/2025
Date Range 2/1/2022-1/31/2025
STREET Gilman Street
FROM Durward Street TO Cherry Street
CERTIFICATION DATE 10/22/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Light
Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Fair
Roadway Conditions Fair
Lighting North Side Only
2016 ET Speed Limit mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
Type of Traffic Control Stop @ Almond, Hargrave; AWS @ Phillips %
Total 0
Speed Related 0
DUI 0
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 0
Disadvantaged Community YES
School Zone NO
Vulnerable Populations NO
Safety Factor per mile 1
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
323
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 16

CITY OF BANNING
Date of Speed Survey 5/13/2025
Time of Speed Survey 12:50 PM
85th Percentile Speed 37
50th Percentile Speed 32
10 mph Pace 28-37
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 72
Posted Speed Limit NP
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68 Crash Rate 0.00
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Length of Segment 0.50
Sidewalks Both Sides
Driveways Both Sides
Width 40
Adjacent Land Use Residential
Field Study By LA Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Banning was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 25
Residential District
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
10/22/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 107
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 1,003
Number of Lanes 2
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Date of ADT 5/20/2025
Date Range 2/1/2022-1/31/2025
STREET Hargrave Street
FROM Repplier Road TO Hoffer Street
CERTIFICATION DATE 10/22/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Light
Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Fair
Roadway Conditions Fair
Lighting Both Sides
2016 ET Speed Limit mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
Type of Traffic Control AWS @ Hoffer
%
Total 0
Speed Related 0
DUI 0
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 0
Disadvantaged Community YES
School Zone NO
Vulnerable Populations NO
Safety Factor per mile 1
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
324
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 17

CITY OF BANNING
Date of Speed Survey 5/13/2025
Time of Speed Survey 1:37 PM
85th Percentile Speed 31
50th Percentile Speed 28
10 mph Pace 23-32
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 81
Posted Speed Limit 25
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68 Crash Rate 0.00
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Length of Segment 0.38
Sidewalks Both Sides
Driveways Both Sides
Width 52/58
Adjacent Land Use Residential
Field Study By LA Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Banning was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 30
Closest to 85th Speed
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
10/22/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 106
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 4,315
Number of Lanes 2
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Date of ADT 5/20/2025
Date Range 2/1/2022-1/31/2025
STREET Hargrave Street
FROM Hoffer Street TO Williams Street
CERTIFICATION DATE 10/22/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Light
Truck Traffic Moderate
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Fair
Roadway Conditions Fair
Lighting Both Sides
2016 ET Speed Limit mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
Type of Traffic Control AWS @ Hoffer, Wilson, Nicolet
%
Total 0
Speed Related 0
DUI 0
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 0
Disadvantaged Community YES
School Zone NO
Vulnerable Populations NO
Safety Factor per mile 1
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
325
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 18

CITY OF BANNING
Date of Speed Survey 5/13/2025
Time of Speed Survey 2:14 PM
85th Percentile Speed 34
50th Percentile Speed 29
10 mph Pace 24-33
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 71
Posted Speed Limit 30
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68 Crash Rate 0.00
On-Street Parking None
Length of Segment 0.36
Sidewalks Both Sides
Driveways Both Sides
Width 40
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Railroad
Field Study By LA Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Banning was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 30
California MUTCD Option 2
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
10/22/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 120
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 5,865
Number of Lanes 2 + TWLTL
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Date of ADT 5/20/2025
Date Range 2/1/2022-1/31/2025
STREET Hargrave Street
FROM Williams Street TO Lincoln Street
CERTIFICATION DATE 10/22/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Light
Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve Yes
Visibility Fair
Roadway Conditions Fair
Lighting Both Sides
2016 ET Speed Limit mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
Type of Traffic Control AWS @Lincoln; TS @ Ramsey
%
Total 0
Speed Related 0
DUI 0
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 0
Disadvantaged Community YES
School Zone NO
Vulnerable Populations NO
Safety Factor per mile 1
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
326
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 19

CITY OF BANNING
Date of Speed Survey 5/13/2025
Time of Speed Survey 2:37 PM
85th Percentile Speed 37
50th Percentile Speed 31
10 mph Pace 29-38
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 56
Posted Speed Limit 30
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68 Crash Rate 0.00
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Length of Segment 0.25
Sidewalks East Side Only
Driveways Both Sides
Width 42
Adjacent Land Use Residential
Field Study By LA Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Banning was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 30
Hidden Driveways
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
10/22/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 108
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 4,026
Number of Lanes 2
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Date of ADT 5/13/2025
Date Range 2/1/2022-1/31/2025
STREET Hargrave Street
FROM Lincoln Street TO Westward Avenue
CERTIFICATION DATE 10/22/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Light
Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Fair
Roadway Conditions Fair
Lighting Both Sides
2016 ET Speed Limit mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
Type of Traffic Control AWS @ Lincoln
%
Total 0
Speed Related 0
DUI 0
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 0
Disadvantaged Community NO
School Zone NO
Vulnerable Populations NO
Safety Factor per mile 0
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
327
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 20

CITY OF BANNING
Date of Speed Survey 5/13/2025
Time of Speed Survey 3:14 PM
85th Percentile Speed 40
50th Percentile Speed 32
10 mph Pace 30-39
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 65
Posted Speed Limit 30
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68 Crash Rate 0.00
On-Street Parking South Side Only
Length of Segment 0.50
Sidewalks None
Driveways Both Sides
Width 40
Adjacent Land Use Residential
Field Study By LA Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Banning was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 35
Hidden Driveways
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
10/22/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 54
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 2,100
Number of Lanes 2
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Date of ADT 5/13/2025
Date Range 2/1/2022-1/31/2025
STREET Hargrave Street
FROM Westward Avenue TO Porter Street
CERTIFICATION DATE 10/22/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Light
Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Fair
Roadway Conditions Fair
Lighting Both Sides
2016 ET Speed Limit mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
Type of Traffic Control AWS @ Wesley, Porter
%
Total 0
Speed Related 0
DUI 0
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 0
Disadvantaged Community NO
School Zone NO
Vulnerable Populations NO
Safety Factor per mile 0
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
328
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 21

CITY OF BANNING
Date of Speed Survey 5/15/2025
Time of Speed Survey 11:10 AM
85th Percentile Speed 38
50th Percentile Speed 32
10 mph Pace 28-37
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 54
Posted Speed Limit 40
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68 Crash Rate 0.00
On-Street Parking West Side Only
Length of Segment 0.25
Sidewalks Both Sides
Driveways West Side Only
Width 46
Adjacent Land Use Residential
Field Study By LA Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Banning was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 35
California MUTCD Option 2
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
10/22/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 109
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 2,782
Number of Lanes 2
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Date of ADT 5/13/2025
Date Range 2/1/2022-1/31/2025
STREET Hathaway Street
FROM Morongo Road TO Nicolet Street
CERTIFICATION DATE 10/22/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Light
Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Fair
Roadway Conditions Fair
Lighting Both Sides
2016 ET Speed Limit mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
Type of Traffic Control AWS @ Morongo, Nicolet
%
Total 0
Speed Related 0
DUI 0
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 0
Disadvantaged Community YES
School Zone NO
Vulnerable Populations YES
Safety Factor per mile 2
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
329
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 22

CITY OF BANNING
Date of Speed Survey 5/15/2025
Time of Speed Survey 11:54 AM
85th Percentile Speed 42
50th Percentile Speed 34
10 mph Pace 29-38
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 64
Posted Speed Limit 40
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.94 Crash Rate 0.00
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Length of Segment 0.25
Sidewalks Both Sides
Driveways West Side Only
Width 58
Adjacent Land Use Residential
Field Study By LA Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Banning was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 40
Closest to 85th Speed
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
10/22/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 107
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 2,930
Number of Lanes 4 + TWLTL + Raised Median
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Date of ADT 5/13/2025
Date Range 2/1/2022-1/31/2025
STREET Hathaway Street
FROM Nicolet Street TO Ramsey Street
CERTIFICATION DATE 10/22/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Light
Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Fair
Roadway Conditions Fair
Lighting Both Sides
2016 ET Speed Limit mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
Type of Traffic Control TS @ Ramsey
%
Total 0
Speed Related 0
DUI 0
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 0
Disadvantaged Community YES
School Zone NO
Vulnerable Populations YES
Safety Factor per mile 2
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
330
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 23

CITY OF BANNING
Date of Speed Survey 5/15/2025
Time of Speed Survey 12:35 PM
85th Percentile Speed 42
50th Percentile Speed 34
10 mph Pace 29-38
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 49
Posted Speed Limit NP
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68 Crash Rate 0.00
On-Street Parking None
Length of Segment 0.25
Sidewalks West Side Only
Driveways West Side Only
Width 50
Adjacent Land Use Residential
Field Study By LA Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Banning was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 40
Closest to 85th Speed
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
10/22/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 111
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 1,080
Number of Lanes 2
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Date of ADT 5/13/2025
Date Range 2/1/2022-1/31/2025
STREET Hathaway Street
FROM Lincoln Street TO Westward Avenue
CERTIFICATION DATE 10/22/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Light
Truck Traffic Moderate
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Fair
Roadway Conditions Fair
Lighting Both Sides
2016 ET Speed Limit mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
Type of Traffic Control None
%
Total 0
Speed Related 0
DUI 0
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 0
Disadvantaged Community YES
School Zone NO
Vulnerable Populations YES
Safety Factor per mile 2
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
331
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 24

CITY OF BANNING
Date of Speed Survey 5/15/2025
Time of Speed Survey 1:50 PM
85th Percentile Speed 42
50th Percentile Speed 35
10 mph Pace 35-44
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 46
Posted Speed Limit NP
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68 Crash Rate 0.00
On-Street Parking None
Length of Segment 0.37
Sidewalks West Side Only
Driveways West Side Only
Width 30
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Industrial, Vacant
Field Study By LA Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Banning was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 40
Closest to 85th Speed
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
10/22/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 54
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 651
Number of Lanes 2
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Date of ADT 5/13/2025
Date Range 2/1/2022-1/31/2025
STREET Hathaway Street
FROM Westward Avenue TO Porter Street
CERTIFICATION DATE 10/22/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Light
Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Fair
Roadway Conditions Fair
Lighting West Side Only
2016 ET Speed Limit mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
Type of Traffic Control None
%
Total 0
Speed Related 0
DUI 0
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 0
Disadvantaged Community YES
School Zone NO
Vulnerable Populations YES
Safety Factor per mile 2
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
332
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 25

CITY OF BANNING
Date of Speed Survey 5/27/2025
Time of Speed Survey 9:00 AM
85th Percentile Speed 50
50th Percentile Speed 45
10 mph Pace 41-50
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 64
Posted Speed Limit 45
Total Crashes 2
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68 Crash Rate 0.16
On-Street Parking None
Length of Segment 1.00
Sidewalks South Side Only
Driveways Both Sides
Width 48
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Vacant
Field Study By LA Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Banning was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 50
Closest to 85th Speed
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
10/22/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 200
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 11,751
Number of Lanes 2 + TWLTL + Bike Lane + Raised Median
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Date of ADT 5/8/2025
Date Range 2/1/2022-1/31/2025
STREET Highland Springs Avenue
FROM North City Limit TO Oak Valley Parkway
CERTIFICATION DATE 10/22/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Light
Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Fair
Roadway Conditions Fair
Lighting Both Sides
2016 ET Speed Limit mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
Type of Traffic Control TS @ Oak; AWS @ Discovery, Cougar %
Total 0
Speed Related 0
DUI 0
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 0
Disadvantaged Community NO
School Zone NO
Vulnerable Populations YES
Safety Factor per mile 1
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
333
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 26

CITY OF BANNING
Date of Speed Survey 5/27/2025
Time of Speed Survey 9:22 AM
85th Percentile Speed 46
50th Percentile Speed 41
10 mph Pace 37-46
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 66
Posted Speed Limit 40/45
Total Crashes 1
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.94 Crash Rate 0.06
On-Street Parking None
Length of Segment 0.71
Sidewalks Both Sides
Driveways Both Sides
Width 80
Adjacent Land Use Residential
Field Study By LA Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Banning was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 45
Closest to 85th Speed
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
10/22/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 200
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 22,898
Number of Lanes 4 + TWLTL + Bike Lane + Raised Median
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Date of ADT 5/8/2025
Date Range 2/1/2022-1/31/2025
STREET Highland Springs Avenue
FROM Oak Valley Parkway TO Wilson Street
CERTIFICATION DATE 10/22/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Moderate
Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Fair
Roadway Conditions Fair
Lighting Both Sides
2016 ET Speed Limit mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
Type of Traffic Control TS @ Wilson, Patriot, Starlight, Sundance, Oak %
Total 0
Speed Related 0
DUI 0
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 0
Disadvantaged Community NO
School Zone NO
Vulnerable Populations YES
Safety Factor per mile 1
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
334
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 27

CITY OF BANNING
Date of Speed Survey 5/27/2025
Time of Speed Survey 9:47 AM
85th Percentile Speed 37
50th Percentile Speed 32
10 mph Pace 29-38
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 62
Posted Speed Limit 30
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.94 Crash Rate 0.00
On-Street Parking None
Length of Segment 0.74
Sidewalks Both Sides
Driveways Both Sides
Width 74-104
Adjacent Land Use Residential
Field Study By LA Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Banning was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 35
Closest to 85th Speed
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
10/22/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 200
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 17,851
Number of Lanes 6/4 + TWLTL + Raised Median
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Date of ADT 5/8/2025
Date Range 2/1/2022-1/31/2025
STREET Highland Springs Avenue
FROM Wilson Street TO Sun Lakes Boulevard/1st Street
CERTIFICATION DATE 10/22/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Light
Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Fair
Roadway Conditions Fair
Lighting Both Sides
2016 ET Speed Limit mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
Type of Traffic Control TS @ Sun Lakes, 2nd, Ramsey, Wilson, Redlands Fwy, 10 FWY Ramps %
Total 0
Speed Related 0
DUI 0
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 0
Disadvantaged Community NO
School Zone NO
Vulnerable Populations YES
Safety Factor per mile 1
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
335
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 28

CITY OF BANNING
Date of Speed Survey 5/27/2025
Time of Speed Survey 10:16 AM
85th Percentile Speed 43
50th Percentile Speed 36
10 mph Pace 33-42
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 54
Posted Speed Limit 35
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.96 Crash Rate 0.00
On-Street Parking None
Length of Segment 1.19
Sidewalks Both Sides
Driveways Few
Width 74/65
Adjacent Land Use Residential
Field Study By LA Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Banning was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 40
California MUTCD Option 2
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
10/22/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 200
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 5,645
Number of Lanes 4 + TWLTL + Bike Lane
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Date of ADT 5/8/2025
Date Range 2/1/2022-1/31/2025
STREET Highland Springs Avenue
FROM Sun Lakes Boulevard TO South City Limit
CERTIFICATION DATE 10/22/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Light
Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Fair
Roadway Conditions Good
Lighting Both Sides
2016 ET Speed Limit mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
Type of Traffic Control TS @ Sun Lakes; AWS @ Gleneagles %
Total 0
Speed Related 0
DUI 0
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 0
Disadvantaged Community NO
School Zone NO
Vulnerable Populations YES
Safety Factor per mile 1
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
336
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 29

CITY OF BANNING
Date of Speed Survey 5/27/2025
Time of Speed Survey 2:45 PM
85th Percentile Speed 44
50th Percentile Speed 36
10 mph Pace 31-40
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 57
Posted Speed Limit 35
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.94 Crash Rate 0.00
On-Street Parking None
Length of Segment 0.20
Sidewalks West Side Only
Driveways None
Width 68
Adjacent Land Use Residential
Field Study By LA Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Banning was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 40
California MUTCD Option 2
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
10/22/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 113
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 5,263
Number of Lanes 4 + Bike Lane + Raised Median
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Date of ADT 5/8/2025
Date Range 2/1/2022-1/31/2025
STREET Highland Home Road
FROM Gilman Street TO Wilson Street
CERTIFICATION DATE 10/22/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Light
Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Fair
Roadway Conditions Good
Lighting Both Sides
2016 ET Speed Limit mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
Type of Traffic Control TS @ Wilson
%
Total 0
Speed Related 0
DUI 0
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 0
Disadvantaged Community NO
School Zone NO
Vulnerable Populations YES
Safety Factor per mile 1
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
337
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 30

CITY OF BANNING
Date of Speed Survey 5/27/2025
Time of Speed Survey 1:40 PM
85th Percentile Speed 42
50th Percentile Speed 37
10 mph Pace 31-40
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 62
Posted Speed Limit 40
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.94 Crash Rate 0.00
On-Street Parking None
Length of Segment 0.35
Sidewalks Both Sides
Driveways Both Sides
Width 84
Adjacent Land Use Residential
Field Study By LA Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Banning was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 40
Closest to 85th Speed
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
10/22/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 108
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 2,469
Number of Lanes 4 + Bike Lane + Raised Median
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Date of ADT 5/8/2025
Date Range 2/1/2022-1/31/2025
STREET Highland Home Road
FROM Wilson Street TO Ramsey Street
CERTIFICATION DATE 10/22/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Light
Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve Yes
Visibility Fair
Roadway Conditions Fair
Lighting Both Sides
2016 ET Speed Limit mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
Type of Traffic Control TS @ Wilson; Stop @ Ramsey
%
Total 0
Speed Related 0
DUI 0
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 0
Disadvantaged Community NO
School Zone NO
Vulnerable Populations YES
Safety Factor per mile 1
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
338
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 31

CITY OF BANNING
Date of Speed Survey 5/27/2025
Time of Speed Survey 11:30 AM
85th Percentile Speed 37
50th Percentile Speed 31
10 mph Pace 29-38
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 58
Posted Speed Limit NP
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68 Crash Rate 0.00
On-Street Parking None
Length of Segment 0.35
Sidewalks None
Driveways None
Width 26
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Country Club, Field
Field Study By LA Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Banning was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 35
Closest to 85th Speed
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
10/22/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 36
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 530
Number of Lanes 2
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Date of ADT 5/8/2025
Date Range 2/1/2022-1/31/2025
STREET Highland Home Road
FROM Sun Lakes Boulevard TO South City Limit
CERTIFICATION DATE 10/22/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Light
Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Fair
Roadway Conditions Fair
Lighting East Side Only
2016 ET Speed Limit mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
Type of Traffic Control AWS @ Sun Lakes
%
Total 0
Speed Related 0
DUI 0
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 0
Disadvantaged Community YES
School Zone NO
Vulnerable Populations YES
Safety Factor per mile 2
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
339
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 32

CITY OF BANNING
Date of Speed Survey 5/13/2025
Time of Speed Survey 11:08 AM
85th Percentile Speed 34
50th Percentile Speed 29
10 mph Pace 25-34
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 72
Posted Speed Limit 25
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68 Crash Rate 0.00
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Length of Segment 1.00
Sidewalks None
Driveways Both Sides
Width 40
Adjacent Land Use Residential
Field Study By LA Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Banning was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 30
California MUTCD Option 2
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
10/22/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 58
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 612
Number of Lanes 2 + Trees Median
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Date of ADT 5/20/2025
Date Range 2/1/2022-1/31/2025
STREET Indian School Lane
FROM 8th Street TO Hargrave Street
CERTIFICATION DATE 10/22/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Light
Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve Yes
Visibility Fair
Roadway Conditions Fair
Lighting Both Sides
2016 ET Speed Limit mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
Type of Traffic Control Stop @ Alessandra, Hargrave, 8th %
Total 0
Speed Related 0
DUI 0
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 0
Disadvantaged Community YES
School Zone NO
Vulnerable Populations NO
Safety Factor per mile 1
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
340
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 33

CITY OF BANNING
Date of Speed Survey 5/23/2025
Time of Speed Survey 10:44 AM
85th Percentile Speed 39
50th Percentile Speed 32
10 mph Pace 29-38
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 58
Posted Speed Limit 40
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68 Crash Rate 0.00
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Length of Segment 0.75
Sidewalks None
Driveways Both Sides
Width 38
Adjacent Land Use Residential
Field Study By LA Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Banning was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 35
California MUTCD Option 2
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
10/22/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 120
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 1,752
Number of Lanes 2
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Date of ADT 5/13/2025
Date Range 2/1/2022-1/31/2025
STREET Lincoln Street
FROM Sunset Avenue TO Adams Street
CERTIFICATION DATE 10/22/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Light
Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Fair
Roadway Conditions Good
Lighting Both Sides
2016 ET Speed Limit mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
Type of Traffic Control AWS @ 22nd, Navajo; Stop @ Sunset %
Total 0
Speed Related 0
DUI 0
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 0
Disadvantaged Community NO
School Zone NO
Vulnerable Populations NO
Safety Factor per mile 0
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
341
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 34

CITY OF BANNING
Date of Speed Survey 5/23/2025
Time of Speed Survey 12:38 PM
85th Percentile Speed 48
50th Percentile Speed 40
10 mph Pace 35-44
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 55
Posted Speed Limit 45
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68 Crash Rate 0.00
On-Street Parking North Side Only
Length of Segment 0.75
Sidewalks None
Driveways Both Sides
Width 44/26
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Industrial
Field Study By LA Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Banning was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 45
California MUTCD Option 2
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
10/22/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 130
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 2,333
Number of Lanes 2
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Date of ADT 5/13/2025
Date Range 2/1/2022-1/31/2025
STREET Lincoln Street
FROM Adams Street TO 8th Street
CERTIFICATION DATE 10/22/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Light
Truck Traffic Moderate
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve Yes
Visibility Fair
Roadway Conditions Fair
Lighting North Side Only
2016 ET Speed Limit mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
Type of Traffic Control AWS @ 8th
%
Total 0
Speed Related 0
DUI 0
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 0
Disadvantaged Community NO
School Zone NO
Vulnerable Populations NO
Safety Factor per mile 0
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
342
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 35

CITY OF BANNING
Date of Speed Survey 5/23/2025
Time of Speed Survey 1:41 PM
85th Percentile Speed 43
50th Percentile Speed 38
10 mph Pace 35-44
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 60
Posted Speed Limit 45
Total Crashes 1
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68 Crash Rate 0.13
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Length of Segment 1.00
Sidewalks South Side Only
Driveways Both Sides
Width 66
Adjacent Land Use Industrial, Residential
Field Study By LA Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Banning was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 40
California MUTCD Option 2
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
10/22/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 160
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 6,826
Number of Lanes 2 + TWLTL
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Date of ADT 5/13/2025
Date Range 2/1/2022-1/31/2025
STREET Lincoln Street
FROM San Gorgonio Avenue TO Hathaway Street
CERTIFICATION DATE 10/22/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Light
Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve Yes
Visibility Fair
Roadway Conditions Fair
Lighting Both Sides
2016 ET Speed Limit mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
This Segment is a Designated Safety Corridor
Type of Traffic Control AWS @ San Gorgonio, Hargrave
%
Total 1
Speed Related 0
DUI 0
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 1
Disadvantaged Community NO
School Zone NO
Vulnerable Populations NO
Safety Factor per mile 7
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
343
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 36

CITY OF BANNING
Date of Speed Survey 5/30/2025
Time of Speed Survey 10:14 AM
85th Percentile Speed 38
50th Percentile Speed 33
10 mph Pace 29-38
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 81
Posted Speed Limit NP
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68 Crash Rate 0.00
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Length of Segment 0.34
Sidewalks Both Sides
Driveways None
Width 54
Adjacent Land Use Residential
Field Study By LA Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Banning was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 35
California MUTCD Option 2
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
10/22/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 113
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 2,185
Number of Lanes 2
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Date of ADT 5/20/2025
Date Range 2/1/2022-1/31/2025
STREET Mountain Avenue
FROM North City Limit TO Wilson Street
CERTIFICATION DATE 10/22/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Light
Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Fair
Roadway Conditions Fair
Lighting Both Sides
2016 ET Speed Limit mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
Type of Traffic Control TS @ Wilson; AWS @ Red Bluff
%
Total 0
Speed Related 0
DUI 0
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 0
Disadvantaged Community NO
School Zone YES
Vulnerable Populations YES
Safety Factor per mile 4
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
344
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 37

CITY OF BANNING
Date of Speed Survey 5/14/2025
Time of Speed Survey 2:43 PM
85th Percentile Speed 39
50th Percentile Speed 31
10 mph Pace 30-39
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 48
Posted Speed Limit 40
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68 Crash Rate 0.00
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Length of Segment 0.50
Sidewalks Both Sides
Driveways Both Sides
Width 58
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Park
Field Study By LA Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Banning was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 35
California MUTCD Option 2
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
10/22/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 109
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 1,625
Number of Lanes 2
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Date of ADT 5/13/2025
Date Range 2/1/2022-1/31/2025
STREET Nicolet Street
FROM Sunset Avenue TO Sunrise Avenue
CERTIFICATION DATE 10/22/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Light
Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Fair
Roadway Conditions Good
Lighting Both Sides
2016 ET Speed Limit mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
Type of Traffic Control Stop @ Sunset; AWS @ Sunrise
%
Total 0
Speed Related 0
DUI 0
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 0
Disadvantaged Community YES
School Zone NO
Vulnerable Populations NO
Safety Factor per mile 1
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
345
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 38

CITY OF BANNING
Date of Speed Survey 5/14/2025
Time of Speed Survey 2:08 PM
85th Percentile Speed 31
50th Percentile Speed 25
10 mph Pace 21-30
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 64
Posted Speed Limit 35
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68 Crash Rate 0.00
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Length of Segment 1.00
Sidewalks Both Sides
Driveways Both Sides
Width 38/40
Adjacent Land Use Residential, School
Field Study By LA Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Banning was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 30
Closest to 85th Speed
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
10/22/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 114
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 1,438
Number of Lanes 2
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks @ Sims
Date of ADT 5/13/2025
Date Range 2/1/2022-1/31/2025
STREET Nicolet Street
FROM Sunrise Avenue TO 8th Street
CERTIFICATION DATE 10/22/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Light
Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve Yes
Visibility Fair
Roadway Conditions Fair
Lighting South Side Only
2016 ET Speed Limit mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
This Segment is a Designated Safety Corridor
Type of Traffic Control AWS @ Sunrise, 20th, 16th, 8th
%
Total 1
Speed Related 0
DUI 0
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 0
Disadvantaged Community YES
School Zone YES
Vulnerable Populations NO
Safety Factor per mile 6
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
346
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 39

CITY OF BANNING
Date of Speed Survey 5/15/2025
Time of Speed Survey 9:00 AM
85th Percentile Speed 34
50th Percentile Speed 30
10 mph Pace 26-35
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 70
Posted Speed Limit 35
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68 Crash Rate 0.00
On-Street Parking West Side Only @ 8th-4th
Length of Segment 0.50
Sidewalks Both Sides
Driveways Both Sides
Width 40
Adjacent Land Use Residential, School
Field Study By LA Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Banning was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 30
California MUTCD Option 2
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
10/22/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 106
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 1,601
Number of Lanes 2
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks @ 4th
Date of ADT 5/13/2025
Date Range 2/1/2022-1/31/2025
STREET Nicolet Street
FROM 8th Street TO San Gorgonio Avenue
CERTIFICATION DATE 10/22/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Light
Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Fair
Roadway Conditions Fair
Lighting Both Sides
2016 ET Speed Limit mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
Type of Traffic Control AWS @ 8th, 2nd, San Gorgonio
%
Total 0
Speed Related 0
DUI 0
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 0
Disadvantaged Community YES
School Zone YES
Vulnerable Populations NO
Safety Factor per mile 4
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
347
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 40

CITY OF BANNING
Date of Speed Survey 5/15/2025
Time of Speed Survey 10:17 AM
85th Percentile Speed 35
50th Percentile Speed 30
10 mph Pace 28-37
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 69
Posted Speed Limit 30/35
Total Crashes 1
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68 Crash Rate 0.92
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Length of Segment 1.00
Sidewalks South Side Only
Driveways Both Sides
Width 38
Adjacent Land Use Residential
Field Study By LA Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Banning was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 30
Uncontrolled Crosswalk, Moderate Pedestrian Use, Sidewalk Gaps, Hidden Driveways
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
10/22/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 52
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 997
Number of Lanes 2
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks @ Murray
Date of ADT 5/13/2025
Date Range 2/1/2022-1/31/2025
STREET Nicolet Street
FROM San Gorgonio Avenue TO Hathaway Street
CERTIFICATION DATE 10/22/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Moderate
Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Fair
Roadway Conditions Good
Lighting Both Sides
2016 ET Speed Limit mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
This Segment is a Designated Safety Corridor
Type of Traffic Control AWS @ San Gorgonio., Alessandro, Hargrave, Hathaway %
Total 1
Speed Related 0
DUI 0
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 0
Disadvantaged Community YES
School Zone YES
Vulnerable Populations NO
Safety Factor per mile 6
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
348
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 41

CITY OF BANNING
Date of Speed Survey 5/30/2025
Time of Speed Survey 9:12 AM
85th Percentile Speed 36
50th Percentile Speed 29
10 mph Pace 22-31
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 63
Posted Speed Limit 35
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68 Crash Rate 0.00
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Length of Segment 0.37
Sidewalks West Side Only
Driveways West Side Only
Width 40/30
Adjacent Land Use Residential
Field Study By LA Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Banning was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 35
Closest to 85th Speed
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
10/22/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 60
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 967
Number of Lanes 2
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Date of ADT 5/8/2025
Date Range 2/1/2022-1/31/2025
STREET Omar Street
FROM Wilson Street TO Ramsey Street
CERTIFICATION DATE 10/22/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Light
Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Fair
Roadway Conditions Fair
Lighting West Side Only
2016 ET Speed Limit mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
Type of Traffic Control Stop @ Ramsey, Wilson
%
Total 0
Speed Related 0
DUI 0
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 0
Disadvantaged Community NO
School Zone NO
Vulnerable Populations YES
Safety Factor per mile 1
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
349
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 42

CITY OF BANNING
Date of Speed Survey 5/12/2025
Time of Speed Survey 12:04 PM
85th Percentile Speed 43
50th Percentile Speed 39
10 mph Pace 34-43
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 74
Posted Speed Limit 45
Total Crashes 3
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.94 Crash Rate 0.21
On-Street Parking None
Length of Segment 0.95
Sidewalks Both Sides
Driveways Both Sides
Width 116-102
Adjacent Land Use Commercial, Residential
Field Study By LA Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Banning was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 40
California MUTCD Option 2
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
10/22/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 200
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 13,660
Number of Lanes 4 + Bike Lane + Raised Median
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Date of ADT 5/8/2025
Date Range 2/1/2022-1/31/2025
STREET Ramsey Street
FROM Highland Springs Avenue TO Highland Home Road
CERTIFICATION DATE 10/22/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Moderate
Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve Yes
Visibility Fair
Roadway Conditions Fair
Lighting Both Sides
2016 ET Speed Limit mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
Type of Traffic Control TS @ Highland Springs
%
Total 1
Speed Related 0
DUI 1
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 0
Disadvantaged Community NO
School Zone NO
Vulnerable Populations YES
Safety Factor per mile 2.05
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
350
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 43

CITY OF BANNING
Date of Speed Survey 5/12/2025
Time of Speed Survey 11:29 AM
85th Percentile Speed 42
50th Percentile Speed 38
10 mph Pace 33-42
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 75
Posted Speed Limit 45
Total Crashes 3
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.94 Crash Rate 0.16
On-Street Parking None
Length of Segment 1.10
Sidewalks North Side Only
Driveways Both Sides
Width 100-88
Adjacent Land Use Commercial
Field Study By LA Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Banning was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 40
Closest to 85th Speed
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
10/22/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 200
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 15,577
Number of Lanes 4 + Bike Lane + Raised Median
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Date of ADT 5/8/2025
Date Range 2/1/2022-1/31/2025
STREET Ramsey Street
FROM Highland Home Road TO Sunset Avenue
CERTIFICATION DATE 10/22/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Light
Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve Yes
Visibility Fair
Roadway Conditions Fair
Lighting Both Sides
2016 ET Speed Limit mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
Type of Traffic Control TS @ Sunset
%
Total 0
Speed Related 0
DUI 0
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 0
Disadvantaged Community NO
School Zone NO
Vulnerable Populations YES
Safety Factor per mile 1
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
351
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 44

CITY OF BANNING
Date of Speed Survey 5/12/2025
Time of Speed Survey 11:03 AM
85th Percentile Speed 44
50th Percentile Speed 38
10 mph Pace 34-43
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 68
Posted Speed Limit 40
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.94 Crash Rate 0.00
On-Street Parking None
Length of Segment 0.62
Sidewalks Both Sides
Driveways Both Sides
Width 80
Adjacent Land Use Commercial
Field Study By LA Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Banning was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 40
California MUTCD Option 2
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
10/22/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 200
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 6,962
Number of Lanes 4 + Bike Lane + Raised Median
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Date of ADT 5/8/2025
Date Range 2/1/2022-1/31/2025
STREET Ramsey Street
FROM Sunset Avenue TO 22nd Street
CERTIFICATION DATE 10/22/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Light
Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve Yes
Visibility Fair
Roadway Conditions Fair
Lighting Both Sides
2016 ET Speed Limit mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
This Segment is a Designated Safety Corridor
Type of Traffic Control TS @ Sunset, 22nd
%
Total 1
Speed Related 1
DUI 0
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 0
Disadvantaged Community YES
School Zone NO
Vulnerable Populations NO
Safety Factor per mile 20.3
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
352
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 45

CITY OF BANNING
Date of Speed Survey 5/12/2025
Time of Speed Survey 10:39 AM
85th Percentile Speed 42
50th Percentile Speed 37
10 mph Pace 32-41
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 72
Posted Speed Limit 40
Total Crashes 2
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.94 Crash Rate 0.18
On-Street Parking None
Length of Segment 0.87
Sidewalks Both Sides
Driveways Both Sides
Width 68
Adjacent Land Use Commercial
Field Study By LA Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Banning was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 30
Uncontrolled Crosswalk, Moderate Pedestrian Use, Safety Corridor mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
10/22/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 200
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 11,466
Number of Lanes 4 + TWLTL + Raised Median + Bike Lane
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks @ 16th
Date of ADT 5/8/2025
Date Range 2/1/2022-1/31/2025
STREET Ramsey Street
FROM 22nd Street TO 8th Street
CERTIFICATION DATE 10/22/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Moderate
Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve Yes
Visibility Fair
Roadway Conditions Good
Lighting Both Sides
2016 ET Speed Limit mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
This Segment is a Designated Safety Corridor
Type of Traffic Control TS @ 22nd, 8th
%
Total 2
Speed Related 1
DUI 0
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 0
Disadvantaged Community YES
School Zone NO
Vulnerable Populations NO
Safety Factor per mile 17.0
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
353
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 46

CITY OF BANNING
Date of Speed Survey 5/12/2025
Time of Speed Survey 9:02 AM
85th Percentile Speed 36
50th Percentile Speed 32
10 mph Pace 28-37
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 76
Posted Speed Limit 25
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate .94 Crash Rate 0.00
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Length of Segment 0.66
Sidewalks Both Sides
Driveways Both Sides
Width 46
Adjacent Land Use Commercial, Civic Center
Field Study By LA Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Banning was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 25
Business Activity District
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
10/22/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 200
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 5,554
Number of Lanes 2 + TWLTL + Shared Bike Lane
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks @ 6th, 3rd, 2nd, 1st
Date of ADT 5/8/2025
Date Range 2/1/2022-1/31/2025
STREET Ramsey Street
FROM 8th Street TO Martin Street
CERTIFICATION DATE 10/22/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Moderate
Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Fair
Roadway Conditions Fair
Lighting Both Sides
2016 ET Speed Limit mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
Type of Traffic Control TS @ 8th, 4th, San Gorgonio
%
Total 0
Speed Related 0
DUI 0
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 0
Disadvantaged Community YES
School Zone NO
Vulnerable Populations NO
Safety Factor per mile 1
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
354
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 47

CITY OF BANNING
Date of Speed Survey 5/12/2025
Time of Speed Survey 9:02 AM
85th Percentile Speed 36
50th Percentile Speed 32
10 mph Pace 28-37
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 76
Posted Speed Limit 25
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate .94 Crash Rate 0.00
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Length of Segment 0.31
Sidewalks Both Sides, Gaps
Driveways Both Sides
Width 56
Adjacent Land Use Commercial
Field Study By LA Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Banning was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 30
Moderate Pedestrian Use, Uncontrolled Crosswalks
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
10/22/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 200
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 5,554
Number of Lanes 2 + TWLTL + Shared Bike Lane
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks @ Martin
Date of ADT 5/8/2025
Date Range 2/1/2022-1/31/2025
STREET Ramsey Street
FROM Martin Street TO Hargrave Street
CERTIFICATION DATE 10/22/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Moderate
Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Fair
Roadway Conditions Fair
Lighting Both Sides
2016 ET Speed Limit mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
Type of Traffic Control TS @ Hargrave
%
Total 0
Speed Related 0
DUI 0
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 0
Disadvantaged Community YES
School Zone NO
Vulnerable Populations NO
Safety Factor per mile 1
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
355
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 48

CITY OF BANNING
Date of Speed Survey 5/12/2025
Time of Speed Survey 9:52 AM
85th Percentile Speed 39
50th Percentile Speed 33
10 mph Pace 29-38
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 65
Posted Speed Limit 40
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68 Crash Rate 0.00
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Length of Segment 0.50
Sidewalks Both Sides
Driveways Both Sides
Width 56
Adjacent Land Use Commercial, Industrial
Field Study By LA Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Banning was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 35
California MUTCD Option 2
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
10/22/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 200
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 5,042
Number of Lanes 2
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Date of ADT 5/8/2025
Date Range 2/1/2022-1/31/2025
STREET Ramsey Street
FROM Hargrave Street TO Hathaway Street
CERTIFICATION DATE 10/22/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Light
Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Fair
Roadway Conditions Fair
Lighting Both Sides
2016 ET Speed Limit mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
Type of Traffic Control TS @ Hargrave, Hathaway
%
Total 0
Speed Related 0
DUI 0
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 0
Disadvantaged Community YES
School Zone NO
Vulnerable Populations NO
Safety Factor per mile 1
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
356
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 49

CITY OF BANNING
Date of Speed Survey 5/28/2025
Time of Speed Survey 9:37 AM
85th Percentile Speed 33
50th Percentile Speed 29
10 mph Pace 26-35
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 77
Posted Speed Limit 30
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68 Crash Rate 0.00
On-Street Parking East Side Only
Length of Segment 1.00
Sidewalks West Side Only
Driveways Both Sides
Width 28
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Commericial
Field Study By LA Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Banning was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 30
California MUTCD Option 2
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
10/22/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 57
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 652
Number of Lanes 2 + Shared Bike Lane
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Date of ADT 5/20/2025
Date Range 2/1/2022-1/31/2025
STREET San Gorgonio Avenue
FROM Bluff Street TO Wilson Street
CERTIFICATION DATE 10/22/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Light
Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve Yes
Visibility Fair
Roadway Conditions Fair
Lighting Both Sides
2016 ET Speed Limit mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
Type of Traffic Control AWS @ Repplier, Wilson; Stop @ Gilman %
Total 0
Speed Related 0
DUI 0
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 0
Disadvantaged Community YES
School Zone NO
Vulnerable Populations NO
Safety Factor per mile 1
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
357
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 50

CITY OF BANNING
Date of Speed Survey 5/23/2025
Time of Speed Survey 2:45 PM
85th Percentile Speed 30
50th Percentile Speed 24
10 mph Pace 21-30
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 59
Posted Speed Limit 25
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68 Crash Rate 0.00
On-Street Parking None
Length of Segment 1.00
Sidewalks Both Sides
Driveways Both Sides
Width 46
Adjacent Land Use Residential
Field Study By LA Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Banning was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 25
Heavy Pedestrian Use, Uncontrolled Crosswalks, Hidden Driveways mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
10/22/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 110
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 2,596
Number of Lanes 2 + TWLTL + Shared Bike Lane
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks @ George, Hays
Date of ADT 5/20/2025
Date Range 2/1/2022-1/31/2025
STREET San Gorgonio Avenue
FROM Wilson Street TO Ramsey Street
CERTIFICATION DATE 10/22/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Heavy
Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Fair
Roadway Conditions Fair
Lighting West Side Only
2016 ET Speed Limit mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
Type of Traffic Control AWS @ Wilson, George, Nicolet, Williams, Ramsey %
Total 0
Speed Related 0
DUI 0
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 0
Disadvantaged Community YES
School Zone YES
Vulnerable Populations NO
Safety Factor per mile 4
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
358
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 51

CITY OF BANNING
Date of Speed Survey 5/23/2025
Time of Speed Survey 2:08 PM
85th Percentile Speed 25
50th Percentile Speed 21
10 mph Pace 15-24
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 82
Posted Speed Limit 30
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68 Crash Rate 0.00
On-Street Parking None
Length of Segment 0.24
Sidewalks None
Driveways Both Sides
Width 44
Adjacent Land Use Industrial, Railroad
Field Study By LA Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Banning was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 25
Closest to 85th Speed
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
10/22/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 117
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 2,369
Number of Lanes 2
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Date of ADT 5/20/2025
Date Range 2/1/2022-1/31/2025
STREET San Gorgonio Avenue
FROM Ramsey Street TO Lincoln Street
CERTIFICATION DATE 10/22/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Light
Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Fair
Roadway Conditions Fair
Lighting Both Sides
2016 ET Speed Limit mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
This Segment is a Designated Safety Corridor
Type of Traffic Control TS @ Ramsey; AWS @ Lincoln
%
Total 1
Speed Related 1
DUI 0
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 1
Disadvantaged Community YES
School Zone NO
Vulnerable Populations NO
Safety Factor per mile 71.8
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
359
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 52

CITY OF BANNING
Date of Speed Survey 5/27/2025
Time of Speed Survey 10:50 AM
85th Percentile Speed 36
50th Percentile Speed 32
10 mph Pace 28-37
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 76
Posted Speed Limit 35
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.94 Crash Rate 0.00
On-Street Parking None
Length of Segment 1.10
Sidewalks Both Sides
Driveways Both Sides
Width 72
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Country Club
Field Study By LA Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Banning was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 35
Closest to 85th Speed
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
10/22/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 109
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 4,267
Number of Lanes 4 + Raised Median
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Date of ADT 5/8/2025
Date Range 2/1/2022-1/31/2025
STREET Sun Lakes Boulevard
FROM Highland Springs Avenue TO Highland Home Road
CERTIFICATION DATE 10/22/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Light
Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve Yes
Visibility Fair
Roadway Conditions Good
Lighting Both Sides
2016 ET Speed Limit mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
Type of Traffic Control TS @ Highland Springs; AWS @ Country Club, Twin Hills, Highland Home %
Total 0
Speed Related 0
DUI 0
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 0
Disadvantaged Community NO
School Zone NO
Vulnerable Populations YES
Safety Factor per mile 1
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
360
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 53

CITY OF BANNING
Date of Speed Survey 5/30/2025
Time of Speed Survey 11:11 AM
85th Percentile Speed 34
50th Percentile Speed 32
10 mph Pace 26-35
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 91
Posted Speed Limit NP
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68 Crash Rate 0.00
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Length of Segment 0.23
Sidewalks None
Driveways West Side Only
Width 40
Adjacent Land Use Residential
Field Study By LA Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Banning was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 30
California MUTCD Option 2
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
10/22/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 53
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 898
Number of Lanes 2
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Date of ADT 5/8/2025
Date Range 2/1/2022-1/31/2025
STREET Sunrise Avenue
FROM Wilson Street TO Nicolet Street
CERTIFICATION DATE 10/22/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Light
Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Fair
Roadway Conditions Fair
Lighting East Side Only
2016 ET Speed Limit mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
Type of Traffic Control AWS @ Nicolet; Stop @ Wilson
%
Total 0
Speed Related 0
DUI 0
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 0
Disadvantaged Community NO
School Zone NO
Vulnerable Populations NO
Safety Factor per mile 0
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
361
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 54

CITY OF BANNING
Date of Speed Survey 5/29/2025
Time of Speed Survey 9:33 AM
85th Percentile Speed 40
50th Percentile Speed 38
10 mph Pace 34-43
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 89
Posted Speed Limit NP
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68 Crash Rate 0.00
On-Street Parking None
Length of Segment 1.72
Sidewalks None
Driveways None
Width 24
Adjacent Land Use Mountain
Field Study By LA Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Banning was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 40
Closest to 85th Speed
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
10/22/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 61
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 1,340
Number of Lanes 2
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Date of ADT 5/8/2025
Date Range 2/1/2022-1/31/2025
STREET Sunset Avenue
FROM Walling Drive TO Wilson Street
CERTIFICATION DATE 10/22/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Light
Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve Yes
Visibility Fair
Roadway Conditions Fair
Lighting None
2016 ET Speed Limit mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
Type of Traffic Control AWS @ Wilson
%
Total 3
Speed Related 0
DUI 0
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 0
Disadvantaged Community NO
School Zone NO
Vulnerable Populations YES
Safety Factor per mile 4.48
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
362
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 55

CITY OF BANNING
Date of Speed Survey 5/29/2025
Time of Speed Survey 9:13 AM
85th Percentile Speed 45
50th Percentile Speed 40
10 mph Pace 34-43
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 68
Posted Speed Limit 40
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.96 Crash Rate 0.00
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Length of Segment 0.45
Sidewalks South Side Only
Driveways Both Sides
Width 60/64
Adjacent Land Use Residential
Field Study By LA Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Banning was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 40
Hidden Driveways
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
10/22/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 136
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 9,445
Number of Lanes 4 + TWLTL
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Date of ADT 5/8/2025
Date Range 2/1/2022-1/31/2025
STREET Sunset Avenue
FROM Wilson St TO Ramsey St
CERTIFICATION DATE 10/22/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Light
Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Fair
Roadway Conditions Fair
Lighting Both Sides
2016 ET Speed Limit mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
Type of Traffic Control AWS @ Wilson; TS @ Ramsey
%
Total 0
Speed Related 0
DUI 0
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 0
Disadvantaged Community YES
School Zone NO
Vulnerable Populations YES
Safety Factor per mile 2
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
363
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 56

CITY OF BANNING
Date of Speed Survey 5/29/2025
Time of Speed Survey 8:05 AM
85th Percentile Speed 36
50th Percentile Speed 31
10 mph Pace 27-36
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 77
Posted Speed Limit 35
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68 Crash Rate 0.00
On-Street Parking None
Length of Segment 0.51
Sidewalks East Side Only
Driveways East Side Only
Width 65-30
Adjacent Land Use Residential
Field Study By LA Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Banning was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 35
Closest to 85th Speed
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
10/22/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 106
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 2,550
Number of Lanes 2 + Raised Median @ North Side Only
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Date of ADT 5/8/2025
Date Range 2/1/2022-1/31/2025
STREET Sunset Avenue
FROM Ramsey Street TO Westward Avenue
CERTIFICATION DATE 10/22/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Light
Truck Traffic Moderate
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Fair
Roadway Conditions Fair
Lighting East Side Only
2016 ET Speed Limit mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
Type of Traffic Control TS @ Ramsey; AWS @ Westward
%
Total 1
Speed Related 0
DUI 1
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 0
Disadvantaged Community NO
School Zone NO
Vulnerable Populations YES
Safety Factor per mile 2.96
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
364
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 57

CITY OF BANNING
Date of Speed Survey 6/2/2025
Time of Speed Survey 11:25 AM
85th Percentile Speed 34
50th Percentile Speed 31
10 mph Pace 27-36
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 88
Posted Speed Limit 35
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68 Crash Rate 0.00
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Length of Segment 0.98
Sidewalks None
Driveways Both Sides
Width 36
Adjacent Land Use Residential
Field Study By LA Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Banning was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 25
Residential District
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
10/22/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 26
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 360
Number of Lanes 2
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Date of ADT 5/13/2025
Date Range 2/1/2022-1/31/2025
STREET Wesley Street
FROM San Gorgonio Avenue TO Hathaway Street
CERTIFICATION DATE 10/22/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Light
Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Fair
Roadway Conditions Fair
Lighting Both Sides
2016 ET Speed Limit mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
Type of Traffic Control Stop @ San Gorgonio; AWS @ Hargrave %
Total 0
Speed Related 0
DUI 0
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 0
Disadvantaged Community NO
School Zone NO
Vulnerable Populations NO
Safety Factor per mile 0
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
365
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 58

CITY OF BANNING
Date of Speed Survey 5/23/2025
Time of Speed Survey 9:39 AM
85th Percentile Speed 45
50th Percentile Speed 39
10 mph Pace 37-46
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 55
Posted Speed Limit 40
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68 Crash Rate 0.00
On-Street Parking North Side Only
Length of Segment 0.60
Sidewalks North Side Only
Driveways North Side Only
Width 28
Adjacent Land Use Residential
Field Study By LA Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Banning was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 45
Closest to 85th Speed
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
10/22/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 60
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 1,226
Number of Lanes 2
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Date of ADT 5/13/2025
Date Range 2/1/2022-1/31/2025
STREET Westward Avenue
FROM Sunset Avenue TO 22nd Street
CERTIFICATION DATE 10/22/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Light
Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Fair
Roadway Conditions Fair
Lighting North Side Only
2016 ET Speed Limit mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
Type of Traffic Control AWS @ Sunset, 22nd
%
Total 0
Speed Related 0
DUI 0
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 0
Disadvantaged Community YES
School Zone NO
Vulnerable Populations YES
Safety Factor per mile 2
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
366
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 59

CITY OF BANNING
Date of Speed Survey 5/23/2025
Time of Speed Survey 8:33 AM
85th Percentile Speed 47
50th Percentile Speed 40
10 mph Pace 34-43
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 50
Posted Speed Limit 40
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68 Crash Rate 0.00
On-Street Parking None
Length of Segment 0.90
Sidewalks None
Driveways Both Sides
Width 34
Adjacent Land Use Residential
Field Study By LA Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Banning was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 40
Closest to 85th Speed & Safety Corridor
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
10/22/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 107
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 1,298
Number of Lanes 2
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Date of ADT 5/13/2025
Date Range 2/1/2022-1/31/2025
STREET Westward Avenue
FROM 22nd Street TO 8th Street
CERTIFICATION DATE 10/22/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Light
Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Fair
Roadway Conditions Fair
Lighting South Side Only
2016 ET Speed Limit mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
This Segment is a Designated Safety Corridor
Type of Traffic Control AWS @ 22nd, 8th
%
Total 1
Speed Related 1
DUI 0
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 0
Disadvantaged Community YES
School Zone NO
Vulnerable Populations YES
Safety Factor per mile 15.3
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
367
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 60

CITY OF BANNING
Date of Speed Survey 5/23/2025
Time of Speed Survey 8:15 AM
85th Percentile Speed 38
50th Percentile Speed 33
10 mph Pace 29-38
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 71
Posted Speed Limit NP
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68 Crash Rate 0.00
On-Street Parking North Side Only
Length of Segment 0.50
Sidewalks North Side Only
Driveways North Side Only
Width 32/42
Adjacent Land Use Residential, School
Field Study By LA Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Banning was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 35
California MUTCD Option 2
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
10/22/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 132
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 2,456
Number of Lanes 2
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Date of ADT 5/13/2025
Date Range 2/1/2022-1/31/2025
STREET Westward Avenue
FROM 8th Street TO San Gorgonio Avenue
CERTIFICATION DATE 10/22/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Light
Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Fair
Roadway Conditions Fair
Lighting Both Sides
2016 ET Speed Limit mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
This Segment is a Designated Safety Corridor
Type of Traffic Control AWS @ 8th; Stop @ San Gorgonio
%
Total 0
Speed Related 0
DUI 0
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 0
Disadvantaged Community YES
School Zone YES
Vulnerable Populations YES
Safety Factor per mile 5
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
368
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 61

CITY OF BANNING
Date of Speed Survey 5/15/2025
Time of Speed Survey 2:42 PM
85th Percentile Speed 37
50th Percentile Speed 32
10 mph Pace 27-36
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 54
Posted Speed Limit NP
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68 Crash Rate 0.00
On-Street Parking None
Length of Segment 0.50
Sidewalks None
Driveways Both Sides
Width 34
Adjacent Land Use Industrial
Field Study By LA Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Banning was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 35
Closest to 85th Speed
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
10/22/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 35
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 87
Number of Lanes 2
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Date of ADT 5/13/2025
Date Range 2/1/2022-1/31/2025
STREET Westward Avenue
FROM Hathaway Street TO East End
CERTIFICATION DATE 10/22/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Light
Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Fair
Roadway Conditions Fair
Lighting Both Sides
2016 ET Speed Limit mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
Type of Traffic Control Stop @ Hathaway
%
Total 0
Speed Related 0
DUI 0
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 0
Disadvantaged Community YES
School Zone NO
Vulnerable Populations YES
Safety Factor per mile 2
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
369
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 62

CITY OF BANNING
Date of Speed Survey 5/29/2025
Time of Speed Survey 10:42 AM
85th Percentile Speed 39
50th Percentile Speed 33
10 mph Pace 26-35
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 61
Posted Speed Limit 25
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68 Crash Rate 0.00
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Length of Segment 0.50
Sidewalks South Side Only
Driveways Both Sides
Width 58
Adjacent Land Use Residential
Field Study By LA Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Banning was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 35
California MUTCD Option 2
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
10/22/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 114
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 1,442
Number of Lanes 2
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Date of ADT 5/13/2025
Date Range 2/1/2022-1/31/2025
STREET Williams Street
FROM Sunset Avenue TO Sunrise Avenue
CERTIFICATION DATE 10/22/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Light
Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve Yes
Visibility Fair
Roadway Conditions Good
Lighting North Side Only
2016 ET Speed Limit mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
Type of Traffic Control Stop @ Sunset
%
Total 0
Speed Related 0
DUI 0
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 0
Disadvantaged Community YES
School Zone NO
Vulnerable Populations NO
Safety Factor per mile 1
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
370
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 63

CITY OF BANNING
Date of Speed Survey 5/29/2025
Time of Speed Survey 11:39 AM
85th Percentile Speed 31
50th Percentile Speed 27
10 mph Pace 22-31
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 84
Posted Speed Limit 25
Total Crashes 1
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68 Crash Rate 0.56
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Length of Segment 1.25
Sidewalks Both Sides
Driveways Both Sides
Width 40
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Railroad
Field Study By LA Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Banning was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 25
Residential District
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
10/22/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 105
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 1,305
Number of Lanes 2
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Date of ADT 5/13/2025
Date Range 2/1/2022-1/31/2025
STREET Williams Street
FROM Sunrise Avenue TO 4th Street
CERTIFICATION DATE 10/22/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Light
Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Fair
Roadway Conditions Fair
Lighting Both Sides
2016 ET Speed Limit mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
Type of Traffic Control Stop @ 4th, 8th; AWS @ 16th, 21st %
Total 0
Speed Related 0
DUI 0
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 0
Disadvantaged Community YES
School Zone NO
Vulnerable Populations NO
Safety Factor per mile 1
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
371
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 64

CITY OF BANNING
Date of Speed Survey 5/29/2025
Time of Speed Survey 12:51 PM
85th Percentile Speed 25
50th Percentile Speed 22
10 mph Pace 18-27
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 91
Posted Speed Limit 25
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68 Crash Rate 0.00
On-Street Parking None
Length of Segment 0.30
Sidewalks Both Sides
Driveways Both Sides
Width 30
Adjacent Land Use Residential, School
Field Study By LA Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Banning was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 25
Closest to 85th Speed
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
10/22/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 55
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 887
Number of Lanes 2
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Date of ADT 5/13/2025
Date Range 2/1/2022-1/31/2025
STREET Williams Street
FROM 4th Street TO Murray Street
CERTIFICATION DATE 10/22/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Light
Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Fair
Roadway Conditions Fair
Lighting North Side Only
2016 ET Speed Limit mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
Type of Traffic Control Stop @ Murray, 4th; AWS @ San Gorgonio, 1st, 2nd %
Total 0
Speed Related 0
DUI 0
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 0
Disadvantaged Community YES
School Zone YES
Vulnerable Populations NO
Safety Factor per mile 4
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
372
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 65

CITY OF BANNING
Date of Speed Survey 5/29/2025
Time of Speed Survey 2:44 PM
85th Percentile Speed 35
50th Percentile Speed 30
10 mph Pace 24-33
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 73
Posted Speed Limit 25
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68 Crash Rate 0.00
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Length of Segment 0.93
Sidewalks Both Sides
Driveways Both Sides
Width 40
Adjacent Land Use Residential
Field Study By LA Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Banning was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 30
Residential Density, Moderate Pedestrian Use
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
10/22/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 109
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 443
Number of Lanes 2
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Date of ADT 5/13/2025
Date Range 2/1/2022-1/31/2025
STREET Williams Street
FROM Murray Street TO Hathaway Street
CERTIFICATION DATE 10/22/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Moderate
Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Fair
Roadway Conditions Fair
Lighting North Side Only
2016 ET Speed Limit mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
Type of Traffic Control Stop @ Hathaway, Hargrave, Alessandro, Murray %
Total 0
Speed Related 0
DUI 0
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 0
Disadvantaged Community YES
School Zone NO
Vulnerable Populations NO
Safety Factor per mile 1
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
373
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 66

CITY OF BANNING
Date of Speed Survey 5/12/2025
Time of Speed Survey 12:32 PM
85th Percentile Speed 47
50th Percentile Speed 42
10 mph Pace 38-47
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 68
Posted Speed Limit 45
Total Crashes 2
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.94 Crash Rate 0.11
On-Street Parking None
Length of Segment 0.98
Sidewalks Both Sides
Driveways Both Sides
Width 80
Adjacent Land Use Residential
Field Study By LA Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Banning was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 45
Closest to 85th Speed
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
10/22/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 200
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 17,016
Number of Lanes 4 + TWLTL + Bike Lane + Raised Median
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Date of ADT 5/20/2025
Date Range 2/1/2022-1/31/2025
STREET Wilson Street
FROM Highland Springs Avenue TO Highland Home Road
CERTIFICATION DATE 10/22/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Light
Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve Yes
Visibility Fair
Roadway Conditions Fair
Lighting Both Sides
2016 ET Speed Limit mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
Type of Traffic Control TS @ Highland Springs, Apex, Highland Home %
Total 0
Speed Related 0
DUI 0
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 0
Disadvantaged Community NO
School Zone NO
Vulnerable Populations YES
Safety Factor per mile 1
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
374
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 67

CITY OF BANNING
Date of Speed Survey 5/12/2025
Time of Speed Survey 12:56 PM
85th Percentile Speed 48
50th Percentile Speed 43
10 mph Pace 38-47
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 70
Posted Speed Limit 45
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.94 Crash Rate 0.00
On-Street Parking None
Length of Segment 1.00
Sidewalks South Side Only
Driveways Both Sides
Width 80
Adjacent Land Use Residential
Field Study By LA Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Banning was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 45
California MUTCD Option 2
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
10/22/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 200
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 16,416
Number of Lanes 4/2 + TWLTL + Raised Median
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Date of ADT 5/20/2025
Date Range 2/1/2022-1/31/2025
STREET Wilson Street
FROM Highland Home Road TO Sunset Avenue
CERTIFICATION DATE 10/22/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Light
Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve Yes
Visibility Fair
Roadway Conditions Fair
Lighting South Side Only
2016 ET Speed Limit mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
Type of Traffic Control TS @ Highland Home, Mountain; AWS @ Sunset %
Total 0
Speed Related 0
DUI 0
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 0
Disadvantaged Community NO
School Zone YES
Vulnerable Populations YES
Safety Factor per mile 4
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
375
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 68

CITY OF BANNING
Date of Speed Survey 5/12/2025
Time of Speed Survey 1:24 PM
85th Percentile Speed 48
50th Percentile Speed 41
10 mph Pace 35-44
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 56
Posted Speed Limit 50
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68 Crash Rate 0.00
On-Street Parking South Side Only
Length of Segment 0.50
Sidewalks South Side Only
Driveways South Side Only
Width 46-34
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Mountain
Field Study By LA Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Banning was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 45
California MUTCD Option 2
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
10/22/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 200
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 11,190
Number of Lanes 2
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Date of ADT 5/20/2025
Date Range 2/1/2022-1/31/2025
STREET Wilson Street
FROM Sunset Avenue TO Sunrise Avenue
CERTIFICATION DATE 10/22/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Light
Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Fair
Roadway Conditions Fair
Lighting South Side Only
2016 ET Speed Limit mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
Type of Traffic Control AWS @ Sunset
%
Total 0
Speed Related 0
DUI 0
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 0
Disadvantaged Community NO
School Zone NO
Vulnerable Populations NO
Safety Factor per mile 0
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
376
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 69

CITY OF BANNING
Date of Speed Survey 5/12/2025
Time of Speed Survey 1:58 PM
85th Percentile Speed 48
50th Percentile Speed 43
10 mph Pace 39-48
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 64
Posted Speed Limit 40
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.96 Crash Rate 0.00
On-Street Parking South Side Only
Length of Segment 1.00
Sidewalks Both Sides
Driveways Both Sides
Width 70-64
Adjacent Land Use Residential, School
Field Study By LA Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Banning was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 40
California MUTCD Option 2 & Safety Corridor
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
10/22/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 200
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 6,585
Number of Lanes 4 + TWLTL
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks @ 12th, 10th
Date of ADT 5/20/2025
Date Range 2/1/2022-1/31/2025
STREET Wilson Street
FROM Sunrise Avenue TO 8th Street
CERTIFICATION DATE 10/22/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Light
Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Fair
Roadway Conditions Fair
Lighting Both Sides
2016 ET Speed Limit mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
This Segment is a Designated Safety Corridor
Type of Traffic Control AWS @ 8th
%
Total 1
Speed Related 0
DUI 0
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 0
Disadvantaged Community NO
School Zone YES
Vulnerable Populations NO
Safety Factor per mile 5
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
377
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 70

CITY OF BANNING
Date of Speed Survey 5/12/2025
Time of Speed Survey 2:36 PM
85th Percentile Speed 40
50th Percentile Speed 35
10 mph Pace 31-40
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 76
Posted Speed Limit 40
Total Crashes 1
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68 Crash Rate 0.13
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Length of Segment 1.10
Sidewalks Both Sides
Driveways Both Sides
Width 40
Adjacent Land Use Residential
Field Study By LA Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Banning was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 40
Closest to 85th Speed
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
10/22/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 200
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 6,521
Number of Lanes 2 + Shared Bike Lane
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Date of ADT 5/20/2025
Date Range 2/1/2022-1/31/2025
STREET Wilson Street
FROM 8th Street TO Blanchard Street
CERTIFICATION DATE 10/22/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Light
Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Fair
Roadway Conditions Good
Lighting Both Sides
2016 ET Speed Limit mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
Type of Traffic Control AWS @ 8th, 4th, San Gorgonio, Alessandro, Florida; Stop @ Almond, Blanchard
%
Total 0
Speed Related 0
DUI 0
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 0
Disadvantaged Community YES
School Zone YES
Vulnerable Populations NO
Safety Factor per mile 4
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
378
2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

CITY OF BANNING

APPENDIX B
Radar Speed Distribution Forms
379
DATE: 05/13/25 DAY: Tuesday TIME PERIOD: 10:20AM 11:04AM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): INDIAN SCHOOL RD AND WILSON ST 65 00 064 00 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 932 8TH ST63 00 062 00 061 00 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 30 MPH OBSERVER:60 00 059 00 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:58 00 057 00 0 ROAD SURFACE:56 00 055 00 0 ROAD CONDITION:54 00 053 00 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:52 00 051 00 050 00 049 00 048 00 047 00 046 00 045 00 044 00 043 X 10 1 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND42 X 10 141 X X X 03 340 X 01 1 85TH %: 36 37 36 M.P.H.39 X X 11 238 X X X X X 32 5 50TH %: 30 32 31 M.P.H.37 X X X 12 336 X X X X X X 33 6 15TH %: 24 27 26 M.P.H.35 X X X X X X 33 6 *34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 7 13 * 10 MPH PACE: 27 - 36 27 - 36 27 - 36 M.P.H.33 X X X X 31 4 *32 X X X X X X 24 6 P % IN PACE: 60% 73% 67%31 X X X X X 23 5 A30 X X X X X X X X 44 8 C % OVER PACE: 13% 17% 15%29 X X X X X X X X X 45 9 E28 X X X X X X X 34 7 * % UNDER PACE: 26% 10% 18%27 X X X X X X 24 6 *26 X X X X 31 4 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 31 32 31 M.P.H.25 X X X X 31 424 X X X 30 3 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 32 28 3023 00 022 X X 20 2 STANDARD DEVIATION: 6 5 5 M.P.H.21 X 10 120 X X 11 2 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.61 0.54 0.2919 X 01 118 00 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.78 0.73 0.54 M.P.H.17 X X 11 216 00 015 00 0 53 52 105

FAIRRADAR

CITY OF BANNING
TO
8TH STREET

CARLOSPARTLY CLOUDRY
380
DATE: 05/13/25 DAY: Tuesday TIME PERIOD: 9:55AM 10:17AM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): WILSON ST AND I-10 WESTBOUND RAMP 65 00 064 00 0 OBSERVATION POINT: NORTH OF WILLIAMS ST63 00 062 00 061 00 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 30 MPH OBSERVER:60 00 059 00 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:58 00 057 00 0 ROAD SURFACE:56 00 055 00 0 ROAD CONDITION:54 00 053 00 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:52 00 051 00 050 00 049 00 048 00 047 00 046 00 045 00 044 00 043 00 0 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND42 X X 11 241 X 10 140 X 01 1 85TH %: 34 36 36 M.P.H.39 00 038 X X X X X 23 5 50TH %: 30 32 32 M.P.H.37 X X X 03 336 X X X X X X 33 6 15TH %: 27 26 27 M.P.H.35 X X X X 13 4 *34 X X X X X X X X 26 8 * 10 MPH PACE: 27 - 36 28 - 37 27 - 36 M.P.H.33 X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 5 12 *32 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 4 13 P % IN PACE: 83% 73% 77%31 X X X 03 3 A30 X X X X X X X X X X X 5 6 11 C % OVER PACE: 8% 9% 11%29 X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 4 12 E28 X X X X X X X X 44 8 * % UNDER PACE: 9% 18% 12%27 X X X X X X X 52 7 *26 X X 11 2 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 31 31 31 M.P.H.25 X 10 124 X X X X X X 24 6 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 17 22 2023 X X 02 222 00 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 4 5 4 M.P.H.21 00 020 X X 11 2 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.33 0.39 0.1819 00 018 00 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.57 0.63 0.42 M.P.H.17 00 016 00 015 00 0 53 56 109

FAIRRADAR

CITY OF BANNING
TO
8TH STREET

CARLOSPARTLY CLOUDRY
381
DATE: 05/13/25 DAY: Tuesday TIME PERIOD: 9:00AM 9:51AM
FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): LINCOLN ST AND WESTWARD AVE 65 00 064 00 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 738 8TH ST63 00 062 00 061 00 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 35 MPH OBSERVER:60 00 059 00 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:58 00 057 00 0 ROAD SURFACE:56 00 055 00 0 ROAD CONDITION:54 00 053 00 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:52 00 051 00 050 X 01 149 00 048 00 047 X 01 146 X X 02 245 X X X 21 344 X 01 143 X 01 1 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND42 X X 11 241 X X 02 240 X X X X X 05 5 85TH %: 34 41 40 M.P.H.39 X X X X 13 438 X X X X X X 06 6 50TH %: 30 36 32 M.P.H.37 X X 02 236 X X X 03 3 15TH %: 25 28 26 M.P.H.35 X X 11 2 *34 X X X X X X X X X 81 9 * 10 MPH PACE: 25 - 34 32 - 41 26 - 35 M.P.H.33 X X X X X X X 43 7 *32 X X X X X X 33 6 P % IN PACE: 79% 55% 59%31 X X X X X 32 5 A30 X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 3 12 C % OVER PACE: 10% 15% 31%29 X X X X X X 33 6 E28 X X X X 31 4 * % UNDER PACE: 12% 30% 10%27 X X X X 22 4 *26 X X X X X X X 43 7 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 31 35 33 M.P.H.25 X X 20 224 X X X 30 3 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 25 47 4223 X X 20 222 X 10 1 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5 7 6 M.P.H.21 00 020 00 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.48 0.89 0.4019 X 01 118 00 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.69 0.95 0.63 M.P.H.17 X 01 116 00 015 00 0 52 53 105

FAIRRADAR

CITY OF BANNING
TO
8TH STREET

CARLOSPARTLY CLOUDRY

NOT POSTED
382
DATE: 05/14/25 DAY: Wednesday TIME PERIOD: 1:15PM 2:04PM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): NICOLET ST AND RAMSEY ST 65 00 064 00 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 102 22ND ST63 00 062 00 061 00 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 25 MPH OBSERVER:60 00 059 00 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:58 00 057 00 0 ROAD SURFACE:56 00 055 00 0 ROAD CONDITION:54 00 053 00 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:52 00 051 00 050 00 049 00 048 00 047 00 046 00 045 00 044 00 043 00 0 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND42 00 041 00 040 00 0 85TH %: 27 30 29 M.P.H.39 00 038 00 0 50TH %: 24 26 25 M.P.H.37 00 036 00 0 15TH %: 22 21 22 M.P.H.35 00 0 *34 00 0 * 10 MPH PACE: 21 - 30 21 - 30 21 - 30 M.P.H.33 X X X X 13 4 *32 X X X 03 3 P % IN PACE: 94% 73% 83%31 X X 02 2 A30 X X X 12 3 C % OVER PACE: 2% 15% 9%29 X X X X X X X 25 7 E28 X X X X X X X 43 7 * % UNDER PACE: 4% 12% 8%27 X X X X X X X X X 54 9 *26 X X X X X X X X X X X 4 7 11 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 24 26 25 M.P.H.25 X X X X X X X X X X 8 2 1024 X X X X X X X X 35 8 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 9 19 1423 X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 4 1222 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 3 13 STANDARD DEVIATION: 3 4 4 M.P.H.21 X X X X X X 33 620 00 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.18 0.36 0.1419 X X X 12 318 X X 02 2 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.42 0.60 0.37 M.P.H.17 X X 02 216 X 10 115 00 0 51 52 103

FAIRRADAR

CITY OF BANNING
TO
22ND STREET

CARLOSSUNNYDRY

NOT POSTED
383
DATE: 05/14/25 DAY: Wednesday TIME PERIOD: 12:10PM 1:12PM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): RAMSEY ST AND LINCOLN ST 65 00 064 00 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 259 22ND ST63 00 062 00 061 00 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 35 MPH OBSERVER:60 00 059 00 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:58 00 057 00 0 ROAD SURFACE:56 00 055 00 0 ROAD CONDITION:54 00 053 00 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:52 00 051 00 050 00 049 00 048 00 047 00 046 00 045 00 044 00 043 00 0 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND42 00 041 00 040 00 0 85TH %: 33 35 34 M.P.H.39 00 038 X X X 30 3 50TH %: 30 29 29 M.P.H.37 X X 20 236 X X X X 04 4 15TH %: 23 24 24 M.P.H.35 X X X X X 14 5 *34 X X X X 22 4 * 10 MPH PACE: 26 - 35 27 - 36 26 - 35 M.P.H.33 X X X X X X X 43 7 *32 X X X X X X X 34 7 P % IN PACE: 69% 72% 69%31 X X X X X X X X X 72 9 A30 X X X X X X X X X X X 5 6 11 C % OVER PACE: 10% 0% 9%29 X X X X X X X X X X X 5 6 11 E28 X X X X X X X 43 7 * % UNDER PACE: 22% 28% 22%27 X X X X X X 24 6 *26 X X X X X 23 5 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 29 29 29 M.P.H.25 X X X X X 14 524 X X X X 22 4 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 24 21 2223 X X X X X 32 522 X X X X X 32 5 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5 5 5 M.P.H.21 X 01 120 X 10 1 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.47 0.38 0.2119 00 018 00 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.69 0.62 0.46 M.P.H.17 00 016 00 015 X X 11 2 51 53 104

FAIRRADAR

CITY OF BANNING
TO
22ND STREET

CARLOSSUNNYDRY
384
DATE: 05/14/25 DAY: Wednesday TIME PERIOD: 11:03AM 12:07PM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): LINCOLN ST AND WESTWARD AVE 65 00 064 00 0 OBSERVATION POINT: SOUTH OF JEFFERSON ST63 00 062 00 061 00 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 35 MPH OBSERVER:60 00 059 00 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:58 00 057 00 0 ROAD SURFACE:56 00 055 00 0 ROAD CONDITION:54 00 053 00 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:52 00 051 00 050 00 049 00 048 00 047 X 10 146 00 045 00 044 00 043 X 01 1 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND42 00 041 X X 11 240 00 0 85TH %: 37 39 37 M.P.H.39 X X 11 238 X 01 1 50TH %: 29 31 29 M.P.H.37 X X X 21 336 X 10 1 15TH %: 23 19 21 M.P.H.35 X X 11 2 *34 X 01 1 * 10 MPH PACE: 25 - 34 32 - 41 25 - 34 M.P.H.33 X X X X X X 33 6 *32 X X 02 2 P % IN PACE: 59% 42% 51%31 X X 11 2 A30 X X 20 2 C % OVER PACE: 26% 4% 25%29 X 10 1 E28 X X 20 2 * % UNDER PACE: 15% 54% 25%27 X X X 21 3 *26 X X X X 31 4 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 30 28 29 M.P.H.25 X X X X 22 424 X 01 1 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 44 66 5423 X X 11 222 X 01 1 STANDARD DEVIATION: 7 8 7 M.P.H.21 X X X X 22 420 00 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 1.62 2.36 1.0219 X X 11 218 00 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 1.27 1.54 1.01 M.P.H.17 00 016 X 01 115 X X 02 2 27 26 53

FAIRRADAR

CITY OF BANNING
TO
22ND STREET

CARLOSSUNNYDRY

NOT POSTED
385
DATE: 05/14/25 DAY: Wednesday TIME PERIOD: 9:00AM 11:00AM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): WESTWARD AVE AND VICTORY AVE 65 00 064 00 0 OBSERVATION POINT: MID BLOCK63 00 062 00 061 00 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 35 MPH OBSERVER:60 00 059 00 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:58 00 057 00 0 ROAD SURFACE:56 00 055 00 0 ROAD CONDITION:54 00 053 00 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:52 00 051 00 050 00 049 00 048 00 047 00 046 00 045 00 044 00 043 00 0 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND42 00 041 00 040 00 0 85TH %: 29 29 29 M.P.H.39 00 038 00 0 50TH %: 26 27 27 M.P.H.37 00 036 00 0 15TH %: 20 22 22 M.P.H.35 00 0 *34 00 0 * 10 MPH PACE: 23 - 32 22 - 31 23 - 32 M.P.H.33 00 0 *32 X 10 1 P % IN PACE: 80% 100% 82%31 00 0 A30 X 01 1 C % OVER PACE: 0% 0% 0%29 X X X 12 3 E28 00 0 * % UNDER PACE: 20% 0% 18%27 X 01 1 *26 X 10 1 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 26 27 26 M.P.H.25 00 024 X 01 1 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 23 10 1423 X 10 122 X 01 1 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5 3 4 M.P.H.21 00 020 X 10 1 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 4.50 1.69 1.3019 00 018 00 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 2.12 1.30 1.14 M.P.H.17 00 016 00 015 00 0 5 6 11

FAIRRADAR

CITY OF BANNING
TO
22ND STREET

CARLOSSUNNYDRY

NOT POSTED
386
DATE: 05/30/25 DAY: Friday TIME PERIOD: 8:00AM 9:06AM
FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): WILSON ST AND RAMSEY ST 65 00 064 00 0 OBSERVATION POINT: MID BLOCK63 00 062 00 061 00 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: NOT POSTED OBSERVER:60 00 059 00 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:58 00 057 00 0 ROAD SURFACE:56 00 055 00 0 ROAD CONDITION:54 00 053 00 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:52 00 051 00 050 00 049 00 048 00 047 X 01 146 X 01 145 00 044 00 043 00 0 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND42 00 041 X X 02 240 X 01 1 85TH %: 29 35 34 M.P.H.39 X 01 138 00 0 50TH %: 26 29 27 M.P.H.37 00 036 X 01 1 15TH %: 23 24 23 M.P.H.35 X X 02 2 *34 X X X X X 14 5 * 10 MPH PACE: 22 - 31 25 - 34 22 - 31 M.P.H.33 X 01 1 *32 X X X 03 3 P % IN PACE: 94% 62% 72%31 X 10 1 A30 X X X X X 23 5 C % OVER PACE: 3% 20% 23%29 X X X X X X X X X 36 9 E28 X X X X X X 42 6 * % UNDER PACE: 3% 18% 5%27 X X X X X X X 43 7 *26 X X X X X X X X X 72 9 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 26 30 28 M.P.H.25 X X X X X X 24 624 X X X X 22 4 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 8 44 3223 X X X X 40 422 X X X X X 23 5 STANDARD DEVIATION: 3 7 6 M.P.H.21 X 10 120 X 01 1 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.25 0.97 0.4119 X X 02 218 00 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.50 0.98 0.64 M.P.H.17 00 016 00 015 00 0 33 45 78

FAIRRADAR

CITY OF BANNING
TO

APEX STREET

CARLOSSUNNYDRY

NOT POSTED
387
DATE: 05/28/25 DAY: Wednesday TIME PERIOD: 7:30AM 9:30AM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): HALE LN AND SAN GORGONIO AVE 65 00 064 00 0 OBSERVATION POINT: WAR CONSTRUCTION DRIVEWAY63 00 062 00 061 00 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 45 MPH OBSERVER:60 00 059 00 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:58 00 057 00 0 ROAD SURFACE:56 00 055 00 0 ROAD CONDITION:54 00 053 00 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:52 00 051 00 050 00 049 X 10 148 00 047 X 01 146 00 045 00 044 00 043 00 0 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND42 X 10 141 00 040 X X 11 2 85TH %: 42 39 40 M.P.H.39 X X 11 238 X X 20 2 50TH %: 38 34 36 M.P.H.37 X 01 136 X X 02 2 15TH %: 31 30 30 M.P.H.35 X 10 1 *34 X X 11 2 * 10 MPH PACE: 34 - 43 32 - 41 31 - 40 M.P.H.33 X X 02 2 *32 X 01 1 P % IN PACE: 70% 75% 73%31 X 10 1 A30 X 01 1 C % OVER PACE: 10% 8% 14%29 00 0 E28 00 0 * % UNDER PACE: 20% 17% 14%27 00 0 *26 X X 11 2 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 37 35 36 M.P.H.25 00 024 00 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 39 29 3323 00 022 00 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 6 5 6 M.P.H.21 00 020 00 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 3.93 2.38 1.4919 00 018 00 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 1.98 1.54 1.22 M.P.H.17 00 016 00 015 00 0 10 12 22

FAIRRADAR

CITY OF BANNING
TO

BLUFF STREET

CARLOSCLOUDYDRY

NOT POSTED
388
DATE: 05/28/25 DAY: Wednesday TIME PERIOD: 12:20PM 2:06PM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): 20TH ST AND 8TH ST 65 00 064 00 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 1101 GEORGE ST63 00 062 00 061 00 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 35 MPH OBSERVER:60 00 059 00 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:58 00 057 00 0 ROAD SURFACE:56 00 055 00 0 ROAD CONDITION:54 00 053 00 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:52 00 051 00 050 00 049 00 048 00 047 00 046 00 045 00 044 00 043 00 0 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 00 041 00 040 X 10 1 85TH %: 35 34 35 M.P.H.
39 X 10 138 X 10 1 50TH %: 32 31 31 M.P.H.37 X 01 136 X 10 1 15TH %: 27 25 26 M.P.H.35 X X X X 22 4 *34 X X X X X X X 52 7 * 10 MPH PACE: 27 - 36 26 - 35 26 - 35 M.P.H.33 X X X X 22 4 *32 X X X X X X X X 44 8 P % IN PACE: 82% 78% 80%31 X X X 21 3 A30 X X X X X X X X 44 8 C % OVER PACE: 9% 4% 9%29 X X X 21 3 E28 X X 20 2 * % UNDER PACE: 9% 17% 11%27 X X X X 31 4 *26 X X 11 2 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 31 30 31 M.P.H.25 X X 02 224 X 10 1 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 16 17 1623 X X 11 222 00 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 4 4 4 M.P.H.21 X 01 120 00 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.49 0.73 0.2919 00 018 00 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.70 0.86 0.54 M.P.H.17 00 016 00 015 00 0 33 23 56

FAIRRADAR

CITY OF BANNING
TO

GEORGE STREET

CARLOSCLOUDYDRY
389
DATE: 05/28/25 DAY: Wednesday TIME PERIOD: 2:10PM 3:07PM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): 8TH ST AND HARGRAVE ST 65 00 064 00 0 OBSERVATION POINT: EAST OF SIXTH ST63 00 062 00 061 00 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 35 MPH OBSERVER:60 00 059 00 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:58 00 057 00 0 ROAD SURFACE:56 00 055 00 0 ROAD CONDITION:54 00 053 00 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:52 00 051 00 050 00 049 00 048 00 047 00 046 00 045 00 044 00 043 00 0 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 00 041 00 040 00 0 85TH %: 34 34 34 M.P.H.
39 00 038 X 01 1 50TH %: 30 29 29 M.P.H.37 X X 20 236 X 10 1 15TH %: 26 23 25 M.P.H.35 X X X X X 23 5 *34 X X X X X 32 5 * 10 MPH PACE: 27 - 36 26 - 35 26 - 35 M.P.H.33 X 10 1 *32 X X X X 31 4 P % IN PACE: 80% 69% 75%31 X X 20 2 A30 X X X X X X 42 6 C % OVER PACE: 6% 4% 7%29 X X X X X X X X X X X 6 5 11 E28 X X X X 31 4 * % UNDER PACE: 14% 27% 18%27 X X X X 31 4 *26 X X X X 13 4 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 30 28 29 M.P.H.25 X X X 21 324 X X 02 2 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 17 25 2123 X X 11 222 00 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 4 5 5 M.P.H.21 X X 02 220 00 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.49 0.96 0.3419 00 018 X 01 1 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.70 0.98 0.58 M.P.H.17 X 10 116 00 015 00 0 35 26 61

FAIRRADAR

CITY OF BANNING
TO

GEORGE STREET

CARLOSCLOUDYDRY
390
DATE: 05/28/25 DAY: Wednesday TIME PERIOD: 3:17PM 4:03PM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): HARGRAVE ST AND HATHAWAY ST 65 00 064 00 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 1189 GEORGE ST63 00 062 00 061 00 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 35 MPH OBSERVER:60 00 059 00 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:58 00 057 00 0 ROAD SURFACE:56 00 055 00 0 ROAD CONDITION:54 00 053 00 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:52 00 051 00 050 00 049 00 048 00 047 X 01 146 00 045 X 01 144 00 043 00 0 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 X X 11 241 X X 02 240 00 0 85TH %: 37 36 37 M.P.H.
39 X 10 138 X X 11 2 50TH %: 33 32 32 M.P.H.37 X X X 30 336 X X X X X X 24 6 15TH %: 28 28 28 M.P.H.35 X X X X 31 4 *34 X X X X X X X 43 7 * 10 MPH PACE: 28 - 37 27 - 36 28 - 37 M.P.H.33 X X X X X X X X 35 8 *32 X X X X X X X X 44 8 P % IN PACE: 79% 78% 76%31 X X 11 2 A30 X X X X X X X X 26 8 C % OVER PACE: 9% 15% 12%29 X X X X X X 33 6 E28 X X X X X 23 5 * % UNDER PACE: 12% 7% 12%27 X X X 12 3 *26 X 10 1 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 32 33 33 M.P.H.25 X X 02 224 X X 11 2 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 20 27 2323 00 022 00 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 4 5 5 M.P.H.21 X 10 120 00 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.58 0.66 0.3119 00 018 00 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.76 0.81 0.56 M.P.H.17 00 016 00 015 00 0 34 41 75

FAIRRADAR

CITY OF BANNING
TO

GEORGE STREET

CARLOSCLOUDYDRY
391
DATE: 05/30/25 DAY: Friday TIME PERIOD: 12:40PM 2:40PM
FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SUNSET AVE AND WOODLAND AVE 65 00 064 00 0 OBSERVATION POINT: WEST OF PARK AVE63 00 062 00 061 00 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 25 MPH OBSERVER:60 00 059 00 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:58 00 057 00 0 ROAD SURFACE:56 00 055 00 0 ROAD CONDITION:54 00 053 00 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:52 00 051 00 050 00 049 00 048 00 047 00 046 00 045 00 044 00 043 00 0 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 00 041 00 040 00 0 85TH %: 26 26 26 M.P.H.
39 00 038 00 0 50TH %: 24 25 25 M.P.H.37 00 036 00 0 15TH %: 22 24 23 M.P.H.35 00 0 *34 00 0 * 10 MPH PACE: 20 - 29 21 - 30 21 - 30 M.P.H.33 00 0 *32 00 0 P % IN PACE: 100% 100% 97%31 00 0 A30 X 01 1 C % OVER PACE: 0% 0% 0%29 00 0 E28 X 01 1 * % UNDER PACE: 0% 0% 3%27 X X 11 2 *26 X X X X X X 24 6 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 24 25 25 M.P.H.25 X X X X X X 33 624 X X X X X X X 25 7 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 44 423 X X X X 31 422 X 10 1 STANDARD DEVIATION: 2 2 2 M.P.H.21 X 01 120 X 10 1 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.28 0.24 0.1419 00 018 00 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.52 0.49 0.37 M.P.H.17 00 016 00 015 00 0 13 17 30

FAIRRADAR

CITY OF BANNING
TO

GEORGE STREET

CARLOSSUNNYDRY
392
DATE: 05/28/25 DAY: Wednesday TIME PERIOD: 10:45AM 12:13PM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): 8TH ST AND SAN GORGONIO AVE 65 00 064 00 0 OBSERVATION POINT: EAST OF LINDA VISTA DR63 00 062 00 061 00 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 25 MPH OBSERVER:60 00 059 00 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:58 00 057 00 0 ROAD SURFACE:56 00 055 00 0 ROAD CONDITION:54 00 053 00 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:52 00 051 00 050 00 049 00 048 00 047 00 046 00 045 00 044 00 043 00 0 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 X 10 141 00 040 00 0 85TH %: 32 30 30 M.P.H.
39 00 038 X 10 1 50TH %: 26 27 26 M.P.H.37 X 01 136 00 0 15TH %: 22 24 24 M.P.H.35 00 0 *34 X 01 1 * 10 MPH PACE: 21 - 30 23 - 32 21 - 30 M.P.H.33 X 10 1 *32 X X 20 2 P % IN PACE: 79% 90% 84%31 X 01 1 A30 X X X 12 3 C % OVER PACE: 18% 7% 14%29 X X X X 31 4 E28 X X X X X X X X 26 8 * % UNDER PACE: 4% 3% 2%27 X X X X X 14 5 *26 X X X X X X X X 53 8 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 27 27 27 M.P.H.25 X X X X X X X 16 724 X X X X X X 42 6 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 26 10 1823 X X X 21 322 X 10 1 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5 3 4 M.P.H.21 X X X 21 320 00 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.92 0.36 0.3119 X 10 118 00 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.96 0.60 0.55 M.P.H.17 00 016 00 015 00 0 28 29 57

FAIRRADAR

CITY OF BANNING
TO

GILMAN STREET

CARLOSCLOUDYDRY
393
DATE: 06/02/25 DAY: Monday TIME PERIOD: 9:10AM 11:10AM
FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): DURWOOD ST AND CHERRY ST 65 00 064 00 0 OBSERVATION POINT: WEST OF HERMOSA AVE63 00 062 00 061 00 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 25 MPH OBSERVER:60 00 059 00 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:58 00 057 00 0 ROAD SURFACE:56 00 055 00 0 ROAD CONDITION:54 00 053 00 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:52 00 051 00 050 00 049 00 048 00 047 00 046 00 045 00 044 00 043 00 0 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 00 041 00 040 00 0 85TH %: 26 27 27 M.P.H.
39 00 038 00 0 50TH %: 24 25 24 M.P.H.37 00 036 00 0 15TH %: 21 22 22 M.P.H.35 00 0 *34 00 0 * 10 MPH PACE: 20 - 29 21 - 30 21 - 30 M.P.H.33 00 0 *32 00 0 P % IN PACE: 100% 96% 95%31 00 0 A30 X 01 1 C % OVER PACE: 0% 0% 0%29 X 10 1 E28 00 0 * % UNDER PACE: 0% 4% 5%27 X X X X X 23 5 *26 X X X X 13 4 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 24 24 24 M.P.H.25 X X X X X X X 25 724 X X X X X X 42 6 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 66 623 X X X X X X 33 622 X X X X X X 24 6 STANDARD DEVIATION: 2 2 2 M.P.H.21 X X X 21 320 X 10 1 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.31 0.26 0.1419 X 01 118 00 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.55 0.51 0.37 M.P.H.17 00 016 00 015 00 0 18 23 41

FAIRRADAR

CITY OF BANNING
TO

GILMAN STREET

CARLOSPRTLY SUNNYDRY

NOT POSTED
394
DATE: 05/13/25 DAY: Tuesday TIME PERIOD: 12:50PM 1:34PM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): REPPLIER RD AND HOFFER ST 65 00 064 00 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 1094 HARGRAVE ST63 00 062 00 061 00 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 30 MPH OBSERVER:60 00 059 00 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:58 00 057 00 0 ROAD SURFACE:56 00 055 00 0 ROAD CONDITION:54 00 053 00 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:52 00 051 00 050 00 049 X 01 148 00 047 00 046 00 045 00 044 00 043 X 01 1 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND42 X X 02 241 X X 02 240 X X 02 2 85TH %: 35 39 37 M.P.H.39 X X X 21 338 X 01 1 50TH %: 31 33 32 M.P.H.37 X X X X X X X 25 736 X X X X X X 42 6 15TH %: 25 28 27 M.P.H.35 X X X X X X X 52 7 *34 X X X X X X X X X X 4 6 10 * 10 MPH PACE: 28 - 37 28 - 37 28 - 37 M.P.H.33 X X X X X X 33 6 *32 X X X X X X X X X X X 7 4 11 P % IN PACE: 76% 68% 72%31 X X X X X X X X X X 6 4 10 A30 X X X X X X X X X X 4 6 10 C % OVER PACE: 4% 19% 11%29 X X X X 31 4 E28 X X X X X X 33 6 * % UNDER PACE: 20% 13% 17%27 X X X 12 3 *26 X X 11 2 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 31 33 32 M.P.H.25 X X X 21 324 X X 11 2 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 25 32 3023 00 022 X X 20 2 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5 6 5 M.P.H.21 X X 11 220 X X X 21 3 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.46 0.60 0.2819 00 018 X 10 1 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.68 0.78 0.53 M.P.H.17 00 016 00 015 00 0 54 53 107

FAIRRADAR

CITY OF BANNING
TO

HARGRAVE STREET

CARLOSPARTLY CLOUDRY

NOT POSTED
395
DATE: 05/13/25 DAY: Tuesday TIME PERIOD: 2:14PM 2:33PM
FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): WILLIAMS ST AND LINCOLN ST 65 00 064 00 0 OBSERVATION POINT: NORTH OF RAMSEY ST63 00 062 00 061 00 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 30 MPH OBSERVER:60 00 059 00 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:58 00 057 00 0 ROAD SURFACE:56 00 055 00 0 ROAD CONDITION:54 00 053 00 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:52 00 051 00 050 00 049 X 10 148 00 047 00 046 X 10 145 00 044 00 043 00 0 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND42 00 041 00 040 00 0 85TH %: 34 34 34 M.P.H.39 00 038 X 10 1 50TH %: 31 27 29 M.P.H.37 X X X X X 23 536 X X 02 2 15TH %: 25 22 24 M.P.H.35 X X X X X 32 5 *34 X X X X X X 33 6 * 10 MPH PACE: 24 - 33 24 - 33 24 - 33 M.P.H.33 X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 5 12 *32 X X X X X X X X X X 6 4 10 P % IN PACE: 79% 61% 71%31 X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 2 12 A30 X X X X X 32 5 C % OVER PACE: 17% 18% 18%29 X X X X X X X X 53 8 E28 X X X X X X 42 6 * % UNDER PACE: 3% 21% 12%27 X X X X X X X X 35 8 *26 X X X X X X 24 6 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 30 28 29 M.P.H.25 X X X X X X X X X 54 924 X X X X X X X X X 54 9 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 25 31 2923 X X X X 13 422 X X 02 2 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5 6 5 M.P.H.21 X 01 120 X X 11 2 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.39 0.54 0.2419 X X 02 218 00 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.62 0.73 0.49 M.P.H.17 X X 02 216 00 015 X 01 1 63 57 120

FAIRRADAR

CITY OF BANNING
TO

HARGRAVE STREET

CARLOSPARTLY CLOUDRY
396
DATE: 05/13/25 DAY: Tuesday TIME PERIOD: 1:37PM 2:09PM
FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): HOFFER ST AND WILLIAMS ST 65 00 064 00 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 905 HARGRAVE ST63 00 062 00 061 00 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 30 MPH OBSERVER:60 00 059 00 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:58 00 057 00 0 ROAD SURFACE:56 00 055 00 0 ROAD CONDITION:54 00 053 00 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:52 00 051 00 050 00 049 00 048 00 047 00 046 00 045 00 044 00 043 00 0 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND42 00 041 00 040 00 0 85TH %: 31 32 31 M.P.H.39 X 10 138 00 0 50TH %: 28 28 28 M.P.H.37 00 036 00 0 15TH %: 22 24 23 M.P.H.35 00 0 *34 X X X X X 05 5 * 10 MPH PACE: 22 - 31 25 - 34 23 - 32 M.P.H.33 X X X 12 3 *32 X X X X X X X 34 7 P % IN PACE: 81% 85% 81%31 X X X X X X X X X X X 4 7 11 A30 X X X X X X X X X X 4 6 10 C % OVER PACE: 9% 0% 8%29 X X X X X X X 52 7 E28 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 6 16 * % UNDER PACE: 9% 15% 10%27 X X X X X X X X X 36 9 *26 X X X X X X 24 6 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 27 28 28 M.P.H.25 X X X X X X X X 53 824 X X X X X 32 5 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 19 12 1723 X X X X X X X 34 722 X X X X 40 4 STANDARD DEVIATION: 4 4 4 M.P.H.21 X X 02 220 X 10 1 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.36 0.24 0.1619 X X 20 218 00 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.60 0.49 0.39 M.P.H.17 X 10 116 00 015 X 10 1 53 53 106

FAIRRADAR

CITY OF BANNING
TO

HARGRAVE STREET

CARLOSPARTLY CLOUDRY

NOT POSTED
397
DATE: 05/13/25 DAY: Tuesday TIME PERIOD: 2:37PM 3:10PM
FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): LINCOLN ST AND WESTWARD AVE 65 00 064 00 0 OBSERVATION POINT: NORTH OF BARBOUR ST63 00 062 00 061 00 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 30 MPH OBSERVER:60 00 059 00 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:58 00 057 00 0 ROAD SURFACE:56 00 055 00 0 ROAD CONDITION:54 00 053 00 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:52 00 051 00 050 X 10 149 00 048 00 047 00 046 00 045 00 044 00 043 X 01 1 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND42 X X X X 31 441 X X 20 240 X X 11 2 85TH %: 37 38 37 M.P.H.39 00 038 X X X X 13 4 50TH %: 31 31 31 M.P.H.37 X X X X X X X X X 45 936 X X X X X X 51 6 15TH %: 24 23 24 M.P.H.35 X X X X X X X 52 7 *34 X X X X X X X X 53 8 * 10 MPH PACE: 28 - 37 29 - 38 29 - 38 M.P.H.33 X 10 1 *32 X X X X 04 4 P % IN PACE: 54% 61% 56%31 X X X X X X 24 6 A30 X X X X X X X 43 7 C % OVER PACE: 14% 6% 9%29 X X X X X X X X X 36 9 E28 X X X X 22 4 * % UNDER PACE: 32% 33% 34%27 X X X 21 3 *26 X X X X X X X 43 7 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 32 30 31 M.P.H.25 X X X X X 32 524 X X X 21 3 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 45 47 4623 X X X X 31 422 X X 11 2 STANDARD DEVIATION: 7 7 7 M.P.H.21 X X 11 220 00 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.79 0.87 0.4319 X 01 118 X X 20 2 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.89 0.93 0.65 M.P.H.17 00 016 X 01 115 X X X 03 3 57 51 108

FAIRRADAR

CITY OF BANNING
TO

HARGRAVE STREET

CARLOSPARTLY CLOUDRY
398
DATE: 05/13/25 DAY: Tuesday TIME PERIOD: 3:14PM 4:11PM
FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): WESTWARD AVE AND PORTER ST 65 00 064 00 0 OBSERVATION POINT: NORTH OF WESLEY ST63 00 062 00 061 00 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 30 MPH OBSERVER:60 00 059 00 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:58 00 057 00 0 ROAD SURFACE:56 00 055 00 0 ROAD CONDITION:54 00 053 00 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:52 00 051 00 050 00 049 00 048 00 047 00 046 X 01 145 00 044 00 043 X 10 1 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND42 X 10 141 X X X X X 23 540 X X 11 2 85TH %: 40 40 40 M.P.H.39 X X 11 238 X X X 03 3 50TH %: 32 36 32 M.P.H.37 X X 02 236 X X X X 22 4 15TH %: 29 29 29 M.P.H.35 X X X 30 3 *34 X X 11 2 * 10 MPH PACE: 30 - 39 32 - 41 30 - 39 M.P.H.33 X 10 1 *32 X X X X X X X X X 54 9 P % IN PACE: 67% 71% 65%31 X X X 21 3 A30 X X X X X X 51 6 C % OVER PACE: 17% 4% 19%29 X X 11 2 E28 00 0 * % UNDER PACE: 17% 25% 17%27 X 01 1 *26 X 01 1 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 33 35 34 M.P.H.25 X 01 124 00 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 35 29 3323 X 10 122 X 10 1 STANDARD DEVIATION: 6 5 6 M.P.H.21 X X 20 220 00 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 1.15 1.21 0.6119 00 018 00 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 1.07 1.10 0.78 M.P.H.17 00 016 00 015 00 0 30 24 54

FAIRRADAR

CITY OF BANNING
TO

HARGRAVE STREET

CARLOSPARTLY CLOUDRY
399
DATE: 05/15/25 DAY: Thursday TIME PERIOD: 11:10AM 11:52AM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): MORONGO RD AND NICOLET ST 65 00 064 00 0 OBSERVATION POINT: SOUTH OF GEORGE ST63 00 062 00 061 00 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 40 MPH OBSERVER:60 00 059 00 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:58 00 057 00 0 ROAD SURFACE:56 00 055 00 0 ROAD CONDITION:54 00 053 00 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:52 00 051 00 050 00 049 00 048 X 01 147 00 046 X X 20 245 00 044 X 10 143 X X 20 2 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND42 X X X 21 341 X X X X 22 440 X X 02 2 85TH %: 41 37 38 M.P.H.39 X 01 138 X X X 21 3 50TH %: 33 30 32 M.P.H.37 X X X X X X X X 44 836 X X X X X 32 5 15TH %: 25 25 25 M.P.H.35 X X X 30 3 *34 X X X X X 14 5 * 10 MPH PACE: 28 - 37 25 - 34 28 - 37 M.P.H.33 X X X X X X X X X X X 6 5 11 *32 X X X X 13 4 P % IN PACE: 54% 61% 54%31 X X X 12 3 A30 X X X X X X X X 35 8 C % OVER PACE: 21% 25% 17%29 X X X X 22 4 E28 X X X X X X X X 44 8 * % UNDER PACE: 25% 14% 28%27 X X X X X X 24 6 *26 X X X X X 14 5 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 32 31 32 M.P.H.25 X X X X X 32 524 X X X 12 3 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 54 39 4623 X X X X 22 422 X 01 1 STANDARD DEVIATION: 7 6 7 M.P.H.21 X 01 120 X 10 1 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 1.03 0.68 0.4219 X X 11 218 00 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 1.02 0.82 0.65 M.P.H.17 X X 11 216 X 10 115 00 0 52 57 109

FAIRRADAR

CITY OF BANNING
TO

HATHAWAY STREET

CARLOSSUNNYDRY
400
DATE: 05/15/25 DAY: Thursday TIME PERIOD: 11:54AM 12:30PM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): NICOLET ST AND RAMSEY ST 65 00 064 00 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 333 HATHAWAY ST63 00 062 00 061 00 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 40 MPH OBSERVER:60 00 059 00 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:58 00 057 00 0 ROAD SURFACE:56 X 10 155 X 01 1 ROAD CONDITION:54 00 053 00 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:52 00 051 X 01 150 00 049 00 048 00 047 X 10 146 00 045 X 10 144 X X X X 22 443 X 10 1 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND42 X X X X X X X 61 741 X X 02 240 X X X X X 23 5 85TH %: 42 40 42 M.P.H.39 X 10 138 X X X X X X 42 6 50TH %: 35 34 34 M.P.H.37 X X X X X X X 34 736 X X X X X X X 52 7 15TH %: 31 28 29 M.P.H.35 X X X X X X X X 44 8 *34 X X X X X X X X 35 8 * 10 MPH PACE: 30 - 39 28 - 37 29 - 38 M.P.H.33 X X X X X X 42 6 *32 X X X X X X X 43 7 P % IN PACE: 69% 63% 64%31 X X X X X X X X X X 6 4 10 A30 X X X X X X X 43 7 C % OVER PACE: 25% 23% 23%29 X X X 03 3 E28 X X X X 13 4 * % UNDER PACE: 5% 13% 12%27 X X X 12 3 *26 00 0 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 36 34 35 M.P.H.25 00 024 X X 02 2 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 34 44 4023 X X 02 222 X 01 1 STANDARD DEVIATION: 6 7 6 M.P.H.21 X 10 120 00 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.62 0.85 0.3719 00 018 00 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.79 0.92 0.61 M.P.H.17 00 016 00 015 00 0 55 52 107

FAIRRADAR

CITY OF BANNING
TO

HATHAWAY STREET

CARLOSSUNNYDRY
401
DATE: 05/15/25 DAY: Thursday TIME PERIOD: 12:35PM 1:49PM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): LINCOLN ST AND WESTWARD AVE 65 00 064 00 0 OBSERVATION POINT: NORTH OF BARBOUR ST63 00 062 00 061 00 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 40 MPH OBSERVER:60 00 059 00 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:58 X 10 157 00 0 ROAD SURFACE:56 X X 20 255 00 0 ROAD CONDITION:54 X X 20 253 00 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:52 00 051 00 050 X 10 149 00 048 X 10 147 00 046 00 045 X 10 144 X X X X 22 443 X X 20 2 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND42 X X X X X 23 541 X X X X X 23 540 X X X X X X 51 6 85TH %: 44 40 42 M.P.H.39 X X 11 238 X X X X X X 24 6 50TH %: 36 32 34 M.P.H.37 X X 11 236 X X X X X X X X 53 8 15TH %: 29 24 26 M.P.H.35 X X X X X 23 5 *34 X X X X X X X 34 7 * 10 MPH PACE: 29 - 38 29 - 38 29 - 38 M.P.H.33 X 10 1 *32 X X X X X X X X 53 8 P % IN PACE: 48% 49% 49%31 X X X 21 3 A30 X X X X X X X X 35 8 C % OVER PACE: 38% 19% 29%29 X X X X X X 42 6 E28 X 01 1 * % UNDER PACE: 14% 32% 23%27 X X 11 2 *26 X X X X X X X X 26 8 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 36 32 34 M.P.H.25 X X 11 224 X X 02 2 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 83 43 6723 X X X X 04 422 X 01 1 STANDARD DEVIATION: 9 7 8 M.P.H.21 X X 11 220 X 10 1 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 1.42 0.81 0.6119 X X 20 218 00 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 1.19 0.90 0.78 M.P.H.17 00 016 00 015 00 0 58 53 111

FAIRRADAR

CITY OF BANNING
TO

HATHAWAY STREET

CARLOSSUNNYDRY
402
DATE: 05/15/25 DAY: Thursday TIME PERIOD: 1:50PM 2:38PM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): WESTWARD AVE AND PORTER ST 65 00 064 00 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 960 HATHAWAY ST63 00 062 00 061 00 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 40 MPH OBSERVER:60 00 059 00 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:58 00 057 00 0 ROAD SURFACE:56 00 055 00 0 ROAD CONDITION:54 00 053 00 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:52 00 051 00 050 X X 11 249 00 048 00 047 00 046 00 045 X 01 144 X X X 12 343 X X 02 2 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND42 X 10 141 X X 02 240 X X X X X 23 5 85TH %: 40 43 42 M.P.H.39 X 01 138 X X X 12 3 50TH %: 30 38 35 M.P.H.37 X X 20 236 X X X 30 3 15TH %: 23 30 24 M.P.H.35 X X X 12 3 *34 X 01 1 * 10 MPH PACE: 33 - 42 35 - 44 35 - 44 M.P.H.33 X X X X 22 4 *32 X 01 1 P % IN PACE: 43% 54% 46%31 X 01 1 A30 X X X X 22 4 C % OVER PACE: 7% 8% 6%29 X 01 1 E28 X X 11 2 * % UNDER PACE: 50% 38% 48%27 00 0 *26 X X X X 40 4 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 32 37 34 M.P.H.25 00 024 X X X 30 3 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 66 43 6123 X X 20 222 00 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 8 7 8 M.P.H.21 X 01 120 00 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 2.36 1.66 1.1319 X 10 118 00 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 1.53 1.29 1.06 M.P.H.17 00 016 X 10 115 00 0 28 26 54

FAIRRADAR

CITY OF BANNING
TO

HATHAWAY STREET

CARLOSSUNNYDRY

NOT POSTED
403
DATE: 05/27/25 DAY: Tuesday TIME PERIOD: 9:00AM 9:19AM
FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): NORTH CITY LIMIT AND OAK VALLEY PKWY 65 00 064 00 0 OBSERVATION POINT: MID BLOCK63 00 062 X 10 161 00 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 45 MPH OBSERVER:60 X 01 159 X X 20 2 COMMENTS: WEATHER:58 X 10 157 X X X 21 3 ROAD SURFACE:56 X X 11 255 X X 11 2 ROAD CONDITION:54 X X X 30 353 X X 20 2 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:52 X X X 30 351 X X X 21 350 X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 6 1249 X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 5 1248 X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 5 1247 X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 5 1246 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 10 1745 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 7 1344 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 5 8 1343 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 8 16 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND42 X X X X X X X X X X X 5 6 1141 X X X X X X X X X 63 940 X X X X X X X X X X X 4 7 11 85TH %: 52 49 50 M.P.H.39 X X X X X X X 25 738 X X X X 22 4 50TH %: 46 44 45 M.P.H.37 X X X X X X X X X X 4 6 1036 X X X X 13 4 15TH %: 40 37 38 M.P.H.35 X X X X X X 24 6 *34 X 10 1 * 10 MPH PACE: 41 - 50 40 - 49 41 - 50 M.P.H.33 X X X 21 3 *32 00 0 P % IN PACE: 64% 64% 64%31 00 0 A30 X 01 1 C % OVER PACE: 18% 11% 12%29 X X X 03 3 E28 00 0 * % UNDER PACE: 18% 25% 25%27 00 0 *26 00 0 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 46 43 44 M.P.H.25 00 024 00 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 37 34 3723 00 022 00 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 6 6 6 M.P.H.21 00 020 00 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.37 0.34 0.1819 00 018 00 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.61 0.58 0.43 M.P.H.17 00 016 00 015 00 0 100 100 200

FAIRRADAR

CITY OF BANNING
TO

HIGHLAND SPRINGS AVENUE

CARLOSPRTLY SUNNYDRY
404
DATE: 05/27/25 DAY: Tuesday TIME PERIOD: 9:22AM 9:40AM
FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): OAK VALLEY PKWY AND WILSON ST 65 00 064 00 0 OBSERVATION POINT: SOUTH OF SUNDANCE DR63 00 062 00 061 00 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 45 MPH OBSERVER:60 X 10 159 00 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:58 00 057 X X 20 2 ROAD SURFACE:56 X 10 155 X X 20 2 ROAD CONDITION:54 00 053 00 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:52 X 10 151 X X 11 250 X X X X X 41 549 X X X X X 41 548 X X X X X 32 547 X X X X X 41 546 X X X X X X X X X X 7 3 1045 X X X X X X X X X X X 6 5 1144 X X X X X X X X X X X 5 6 1143 X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 6 12 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND42 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 8 1641 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 11 1740 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 4 10 14 85TH %: 49 44 46 M.P.H.39 X X X X X X X X X X X X 5 7 1238 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 11 19 50TH %: 42 40 41 M.P.H.37 X X X X X X X X X X 4 6 1036 X X X X X X X X X 54 9 15TH %: 36 34 35 M.P.H.35 X X X X X X 42 6 *34 X X X X X X 24 6 * 10 MPH PACE: 38 - 47 36 - 45 37 - 46 M.P.H.33 X X X X X X X X X 36 9 *32 X X 11 2 P % IN PACE: 59% 74% 66%31 X X X 12 3 A30 00 0 C % OVER PACE: 19% 9% 15%29 X 01 1 E28 X 01 1 * % UNDER PACE: 22% 17% 20%27 X 10 1 *26 X 10 1 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 42 40 41 M.P.H.25 00 024 00 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 41 21 3223 00 022 00 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 6 5 6 M.P.H.21 00 020 00 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.41 0.21 0.1619 00 018 00 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.64 0.45 0.40 M.P.H.17 00 016 00 015 00 0 100 100 200

FAIRRADAR

CITY OF BANNING
TO

HIGHLAND SPRINGS AVENUE

CARLOSPRTLY SUNNYDRY
405
DATE: 05/27/25 DAY: Tuesday TIME PERIOD: 9:47AM 10:06AM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): WILSON ST AND SUN LAKES BLVD/1ST ST 65 00 064 00 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 655 HIGHLAND SPRINGS AVE63 00 062 00 061 00 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 30 MPH OBSERVER:60 00 059 00 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:58 00 057 00 0 ROAD SURFACE:56 00 055 00 0 ROAD CONDITION:54 00 053 00 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:52 00 051 00 050 00 049 00 048 00 047 00 046 00 045 X 10 144 00 043 X 01 1 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND42 00 041 X 01 140 X X X X X X X 34 7 85TH %: 36 38 37 M.P.H.39 X X X X X X X 25 738 X X X X X X X X X X X 5 6 11 50TH %: 32 32 32 M.P.H.37 X X X X X X X X X 45 936 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 5 8 13 15TH %: 26 25 25 M.P.H.35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 7 13 *34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 5 14 * 10 MPH PACE: 26 - 35 30 - 39 29 - 38 M.P.H.33 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 8 16 *32 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 5 14 P % IN PACE: 67% 60% 62%31 X X X X X X X X X X X 6 5 11 A30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 6 13 C % OVER PACE: 20% 6% 9%29 X X X X X X X X X X 5 5 10 E28 X X X X X X X X 53 8 * % UNDER PACE: 13% 34% 30%27 X X X X X X X X X X 6 4 10 *26 X X X X X X X X X X X 6 5 11 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 31 32 32 M.P.H.25 X X X X X X X X X X X 4 7 1124 X X X X X X 15 6 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 24 30 2723 X X X X X X X X X 63 922 X X 20 2 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5 6 5 M.P.H.21 00 020 00 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.24 0.30 0.1319 00 018 00 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.49 0.55 0.37 M.P.H.17 X X 02 216 00 015 00 0 100 100 200

FAIRRADAR

CITY OF BANNING
TO

HIGHLAND SPRINGS AVENUE

CARLOSPRTLY SUNNYDRY
406
DATE: 05/27/25 DAY: Tuesday TIME PERIOD: 10:16AM 10:42AM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SUN LAKES BLVD AND SOUTH CITY LIMIT 65 00 064 00 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 81 HIGHLAND SPRINGS AVE63 00 062 00 061 00 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 35 MPH OBSERVER:60 00 059 00 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:58 00 057 00 0 ROAD SURFACE:56 00 055 00 0 ROAD CONDITION:54 00 053 00 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:52 00 051 00 050 X 01 149 X X X 21 348 X X X 12 347 00 046 X X 20 245 X X X X X X X 34 744 X X X X X X X X 53 843 X X X X X X X X X X 5 5 10 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND42 X X X X X X X X X X X X 5 7 1241 X X X X X X X X X X X 5 6 1140 X X X X X X X X X X X 4 7 11 85TH %: 43 43 43 M.P.H.39 X X X X X X X X X 45 938 X X X X X X X X X X 6 4 10 50TH %: 36 36 36 M.P.H.37 X X X X X X X X X 63 936 X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 4 12 15TH %: 29 29 29 M.P.H.35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 5 8 13 *34 X X X X X X X X X X 5 5 10 * 10 MPH PACE: 32 - 41 33 - 42 33 - 42 M.P.H.33 X X X X X X X X X X X 4 7 11 *32 X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 5 12 P % IN PACE: 54% 56% 54%31 X X X X X X X X X 45 9 A30 X X X X X 23 5 C % OVER PACE: 23% 16% 17%29 X X X X X X X X X X 4 6 10 E28 X X X X X X 33 6 * % UNDER PACE: 23% 28% 29%27 X X X X X 23 5 *26 X X X X X X 42 6 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 36 36 36 M.P.H.25 X X 11 224 X X 20 2 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 38 35 3623 X 10 122 00 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 6 6 6 M.P.H.21 00 020 00 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.38 0.35 0.1819 00 018 00 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.62 0.59 0.43 M.P.H.17 00 016 00 015 00 0 100 100 200

FAIRRADAR

CITY OF BANNING
TO

HIGHLAND SPRINGS AVENUE

CARLOSPRTLY SUNNYDRY
407
DATE: 05/27/25 DAY: Tuesday TIME PERIOD: 2:45PM 3:53PM
FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): GILMAN ST AND WILSON ST 65 00 064 00 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 1100 HIGHLAND HOME RD63 00 062 00 061 00 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 35 MPH OBSERVER:60 00 059 00 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:58 00 057 00 0 ROAD SURFACE:56 00 055 00 0 ROAD CONDITION:54 X 01 153 00 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:52 X 10 151 00 050 X 10 149 X X 11 248 X X 11 247 X X 11 246 X X X X 31 445 X X X X 22 444 X X 11 243 X X X 12 3 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND42 X X X X X 32 541 X X X 21 340 X X X X X X 24 6 85TH %: 45 43 44 M.P.H.39 X X X X 22 438 X X X X 22 4 50TH %: 37 35 36 M.P.H.37 X X X X X X X X X 54 936 X X X X X 23 5 15TH %: 31 30 30 M.P.H.35 X X X X X X X X X X 4 6 10 *34 X X X X 22 4 * 10 MPH PACE: 31 - 40 28 - 37 31 - 40 M.P.H.33 X X X X X X X X 44 8 *32 X X X X 13 4 P % IN PACE: 57% 60% 57%31 X X X X X X X X X X 6 4 10 A30 X X X X X X 15 6 C % OVER PACE: 32% 35% 27%29 X X X X 22 4 E28 X X X 03 3 * % UNDER PACE: 11% 5% 17%27 X 01 1 *26 X 01 1 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 37 36 37 M.P.H.25 00 024 X X 11 2 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 50 40 4523 00 022 00 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 7 6 7 M.P.H.21 X 10 120 X 10 1 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.94 0.67 0.3919 00 018 00 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.97 0.82 0.63 M.P.H.17 00 016 00 015 00 0 53 60 113

FAIRRADAR

CITY OF BANNING
TO

HIGHLAND HOME ROAD

CARLOSPRTLY SUNNYDRY
408
DATE: 05/27/25 DAY: Tuesday TIME PERIOD: 1:40PM 2:39PM
FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): WILSON ST AND RAMSEY ST 65 00 064 00 0 OBSERVATION POINT: SOUTH OF AUTUMN LN63 00 062 00 061 00 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 40 MPH OBSERVER:60 00 059 00 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:58 00 057 00 0 ROAD SURFACE:56 X 10 155 00 0 ROAD CONDITION:54 00 053 00 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:52 X 10 151 X 01 150 00 049 X 10 148 X X 11 247 X 01 146 X 10 145 X X X 12 344 X 10 143 X X X X 31 4 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND42 X X X X 40 441 X X X X X 32 540 X X X X X X X X 44 8 85TH %: 43 40 42 M.P.H.39 X X X X X X 51 638 X X X X X X X X 26 8 50TH %: 38 35 37 M.P.H.37 X X X X X X X X X 72 936 X X X X X 14 5 15TH %: 31 29 30 M.P.H.35 X X X X X X 15 6 *34 X X X X X 32 5 * 10 MPH PACE: 31 - 40 29 - 38 31 - 40 M.P.H.33 X X X X X X 24 6 *32 X X X X X 23 5 P % IN PACE: 62% 64% 62%31 X X X X X X X X X 72 9 A30 X X X X X 14 5 C % OVER PACE: 31% 25% 23%29 X X X 12 3 E28 X X 11 2 * % UNDER PACE: 7% 11% 15%27 X X X 03 3 *26 X X 11 2 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 38 35 37 M.P.H.25 00 024 00 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 37 35 3723 X 01 122 00 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 6 6 6 M.P.H.21 00 020 00 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.67 0.65 0.3419 00 018 00 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.82 0.81 0.59 M.P.H.17 00 016 00 015 00 0 55 53 108

FAIRRADAR

CITY OF BANNING
TO

HIGHLAND HOME ROAD

CARLOSPRTLY SUNNYDRY
409
DATE: 05/27/25 DAY: Tuesday TIME PERIOD: 11:30AM 1:30PM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SUN LAKES BLVD AND SOUTH CITY LIMIT 65 00 064 00 0 OBSERVATION POINT: MID BLOCK63 00 062 00 061 00 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: NOT POSTED OBSERVER:60 00 059 00 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:58 00 057 00 0 ROAD SURFACE:56 00 055 00 0 ROAD CONDITION:54 00 053 00 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:52 00 051 00 050 00 049 00 048 00 047 00 046 00 045 X 10 144 00 043 00 0 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND42 00 041 00 040 X 01 1 85TH %: 37 36 37 M.P.H.39 X 10 138 X X 11 2 50TH %: 29 33 31 M.P.H.37 X X 20 236 X X 11 2 15TH %: 20 25 23 M.P.H.35 X X 02 2 *34 X X X X X 23 5 * 10 MPH PACE: 25 - 34 29 - 38 29 - 38 M.P.H.33 X 01 1 *32 00 0 P % IN PACE: 50% 75% 58%31 X X X X 22 4 A30 X 01 1 C % OVER PACE: 30% 6% 8%29 X X 11 2 E28 X X 11 2 * % UNDER PACE: 20% 19% 33%27 X X 20 2 *26 00 0 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 30 32 31 M.P.H.25 X X X 21 324 00 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 62 20 4423 X X 11 222 00 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 8 5 7 M.P.H.21 00 020 X 10 1 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 3.11 1.28 1.2219 00 018 00 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 1.76 1.13 1.11 M.P.H.17 00 016 X 10 115 X 10 1 20 16 36

FAIRRADAR

CITY OF BANNING
TO

HIGHLAND HOME ROAD

CARLOSPRTLY SUNNYDRY
410
DATE: 05/13/25 DAY: Tuesday TIME PERIOD: 11:08AM 12:29PM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): 8TH ST AND HARGRAVE ST 65 00 064 00 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 566 INDIAN SCHOOL LANE63 00 062 00 061 00 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 25 MPH OBSERVER:60 00 059 00 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:58 00 057 00 0 ROAD SURFACE:56 00 055 00 0 ROAD CONDITION:54 00 053 00 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:52 00 051 00 050 00 049 00 048 00 047 00 046 00 045 00 044 00 043 00 0 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 00 041 00 040 00 0 85TH %: 34 35 34 M.P.H.
39 X 10 138 X X 02 2 50TH %: 28 29 29 M.P.H.37 X 01 136 X 01 1 15TH %: 25 22 24 M.P.H.35 X X 11 2 *34 X X X X 31 4 * 10 MPH PACE: 25 - 34 25 - 34 25 - 34 M.P.H.33 X X X X X 23 5 *32 X X X X 22 4 P % IN PACE: 80% 64% 72%31 X X X X 22 4 A30 X X 11 2 C % OVER PACE: 7% 18% 12%29 X X X X X X 33 6 E28 X X X 21 3 * % UNDER PACE: 13% 18% 16%27 X X X X X 32 5 *26 X X X X 31 4 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 28 29 29 M.P.H.25 X X X X X 32 524 X 10 1 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 26 28 2723 X 01 122 X X 11 2 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5 5 5 M.P.H.21 X X 02 220 00 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.88 1.02 0.4719 X 01 118 00 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.94 1.01 0.68 M.P.H.17 X 10 116 00 015 X 10 1 30 28 58

FAIRRADAR

CITY OF BANNING
TO

INDIAN SCHOOL LANE

CARLOSPARTLY CLOUDRY
411
DATE: 05/23/25 DAY: Friday TIME PERIOD: 10:44AM 11:44AM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SUNSET AVE AND ADAMS ST 65 00 064 00 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 2721 LINCOLN ST63 00 062 00 061 00 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 40 MPH OBSERVER:60 00 059 00 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:58 00 057 00 0 ROAD SURFACE:56 00 055 00 0 ROAD CONDITION:54 00 053 00 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:52 00 051 00 050 00 049 00 048 00 047 X 01 146 X X X 03 345 X 01 144 X X X 03 343 00 0 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 X X 11 241 X 01 140 X X X X 13 4 85TH %: 37 41 39 M.P.H. 39 X X X X 22 438 X X X X X X 51 6 50TH %: 32 33 32 M.P.H.37 X X X X X X X X X X 6 4 1036 X X X X X X 24 6 15TH %: 26 25 25 M.P.H.35 X X X X 22 4 *34 X X X X X X X X X 54 9 * 10 MPH PACE: 29 - 38 31 - 40 29 - 38 M.P.H.33 X X X X X X 33 6 *32 X X X X X X X 43 7 P % IN PACE: 67% 50% 58%31 X X X X X X X X 44 8 A30 X X X X X X X X 62 8 C % OVER PACE: 7% 17% 16%29 X X X X X 32 5 E28 X X X X 31 4 * % UNDER PACE: 27% 33% 27%27 X X X X X X 42 6 *26 X X 11 2 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 32 33 33 M.P.H.25 X X X X X X X 34 724 X X 11 2 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 26 56 4123 X X 11 222 X X X 12 3 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5 7 6 M.P.H.21 X X X 21 320 X X 02 2 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.43 0.93 0.3419 X 01 118 00 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.66 0.96 0.58 M.P.H.17 00 016 00 015 00 0 60 60 120

FAIRRADAR

CITY OF BANNING
TO

LINCOLN STREET

CARLOSPARTLY SUNNDRY
412
DATE: 05/23/25 DAY: Friday TIME PERIOD: 12:38PM 1:36PM
FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): ADAMS ST AND 8TH ST 65 00 064 00 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 1692 LINCOLN ST63 00 062 00 061 00 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 45 MPH OBSERVER:60 00 059 00 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:58 X 10 157 X 10 1 ROAD SURFACE:56 X 01 155 X X 02 2 ROAD CONDITION:54 00 053 X 01 1 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:52 X 10 151 X 01 150 X X 02 249 X X X X X X 24 648 X X X X 31 447 X X X X X X X X 53 846 00 045 X X X 21 344 X X X X X X X X X X X 5 6 1143 X X X X X X 33 6 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 X X X X X X X X 53 841 X X X X X X 33 640 X X X X X X X X 35 8 85TH %: 47 49 48 M.P.H. 39 X X X X X X 33 638 X X X X X 41 5 50TH %: 40 40 40 M.P.H.37 X X X X X X 24 636 X X X X X X X 34 7 15TH %: 30 34 33 M.P.H.35 X X X X X X X X X 45 9 *34 X X X X X 14 5 * 10 MPH PACE: 35 - 44 35 - 44 35 - 44 M.P.H.33 X X X X 22 4 *32 X X X 12 3 P % IN PACE: 54% 57% 55%31 X X 11 2 A30 X X 20 2 C % OVER PACE: 23% 25% 24%29 X X 11 2 E28 00 0 * % UNDER PACE: 23% 18% 21%27 X 10 1 *26 00 0 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 39 40 40 M.P.H.25 X 10 124 00 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 75 57 6623 X X 20 222 X 01 1 STANDARD DEVIATION: 9 8 8 M.P.H.21 X 10 120 00 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 1.16 0.86 0.5119 00 018 00 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 1.08 0.93 0.71 M.P.H.17 00 016 00 015 X X X 21 3 65 65 130

FAIRRADAR

CITY OF BANNING
TO

LINCOLN STREET

CARLOSPARTLY SUNNDRY
413
DATE: 05/23/25 DAY: Friday TIME PERIOD: 1:41PM 2:03PM
FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SAN GORGONIO AVE AND HATHAWAY ST 65 00 064 00 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 504 LINCOLN ST63 00 062 00 061 00 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 40 MPH OBSERVER:60 00 059 00 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:58 00 057 00 0 ROAD SURFACE:56 X 10 155 00 0 ROAD CONDITION:54 00 053 X 01 1 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:52 00 051 00 050 X 10 149 X 10 148 X 10 147 X X 20 246 X X X X X 41 545 X X X X 31 444 X X X X X X X 43 743 X X X X X X X X 53 8 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 X X X X X X X X X X X 8 3 1141 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 3 1340 X X X X X X X X X X 8 2 10 85TH %: 44 43 43 M.P.H. 39 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 0 1238 X X X X X X X X X 63 9 50TH %: 39 34 38 M.P.H.37 X X X X X X X X 53 836 X X X X X X X X 71 8 15TH %: 33 27 31 M.P.H.35 X X X X X X X X X X 5 5 10 *34 X X X X 13 4 * 10 MPH PACE: 35 - 44 29 - 38 35 - 44 M.P.H.33 X X X X X X X 43 7 *32 X X X X X 32 5 P % IN PACE: 70% 52% 60%31 X X X X X X X X X 27 9 A30 X X 02 2 C % OVER PACE: 13% 28% 10%29 X X 02 2 E28 X X X 12 3 * % UNDER PACE: 17% 20% 30%27 X X X X 22 4 *26 X 10 1 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 39 34 37 M.P.H.25 X X 11 224 X X 11 2 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 33 58 4723 00 022 X 01 1 STANDARD DEVIATION: 6 8 7 M.P.H.21 X X 02 220 X X X 12 3 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.33 0.95 0.3019 00 018 00 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.58 0.97 0.54 M.P.H.17 00 016 00 015 X 01 1 100 60 160

FAIRRADAR

CITY OF BANNING
TO

LINCOLN STREET

CARLOSPARTLY SUNNDRY
414
DATE: 05/30/25 DAY: Friday TIME PERIOD: 10:14AM 11:01AM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): NORTH CITY LIMIT AND WILSON ST 65 00 064 00 0 OBSERVATION POINT: NORTH OF ELM DR63 00 062 00 061 00 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: NOT POSTED OBSERVER:60 00 059 00 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:58 00 057 00 0 ROAD SURFACE:56 00 055 00 0 ROAD CONDITION:54 00 053 00 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:52 00 051 00 050 00 049 00 048 00 047 00 046 X 10 145 00 044 00 043 X 01 1 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND42 00 041 X X X X X X 42 640 X 01 1 85TH %: 38 38 38 M.P.H.39 X X X X X 23 538 X X X X X X X X X X 5 5 10 50TH %: 34 33 33 M.P.H.37 X X X X X 32 536 X X X X X X X X 44 8 15TH %: 30 30 30 M.P.H.35 X X X X X X X X X 54 9 *34 X X X X X X X X 35 8 * 10 MPH PACE: 30 - 39 29 - 38 29 - 38 M.P.H.33 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 11 17 *32 X X X X X X X 34 7 P % IN PACE: 79% 84% 81%31 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 7 13 A30 X X X X X X X X X 45 9 C % OVER PACE: 10% 11% 12%29 X X X X X X 24 6 E28 X X 02 2 * % UNDER PACE: 12% 5% 6%27 X X 20 2 *26 X X 20 2 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 34 34 34 M.P.H.25 X 01 124 00 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 18 14 1623 00 022 00 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 4 4 4 M.P.H.21 00 020 00 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.35 0.23 0.1419 00 018 00 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.59 0.47 0.37 M.P.H.17 00 016 00 015 00 0 52 61 113

FAIRRADAR

CITY OF BANNING
TO

MOUNTAIN AVENUE

CARLOSSUNNYDRY
415
DATE: 05/14/25 DAY: Wednesday TIME PERIOD: 2:43PM 3:58PM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SUNSET AVE AND SUNRISE AVE 65 00 064 00 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 2556 NICOLET ST63 00 062 00 061 00 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 40 MPH OBSERVER:60 00 059 00 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:58 00 057 00 0 ROAD SURFACE:56 00 055 00 0 ROAD CONDITION:54 00 053 00 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:52 00 051 00 050 00 049 00 048 00 047 00 046 00 045 00 044 X 10 143 X X 20 2 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 X 10 141 X X 11 240 X X X 12 3 85TH %: 39 37 39 M.P.H. 39 X X X X X X X X 62 838 X X X X X X X X 53 8 50TH %: 31 30 31 M.P.H.37 X X X X X 23 536 X X X X 13 4 15TH %: 23 21 22 M.P.H.35 X X 11 2 *34 X X X X 22 4 * 10 MPH PACE: 30 - 39 29 - 38 30 - 39 M.P.H.33 X X X X X 23 5 *32 X X X X X X 24 6 P % IN PACE: 48% 49% 48%31 X X X X X 23 5 A30 X X X X X 32 5 C % OVER PACE: 11% 9% 8%29 X X X X 13 4 E28 X X X X 31 4 * % UNDER PACE: 41% 42% 44%27 X X X X X X 42 6 *26 X X X X X X X 25 7 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 32 30 31 M.P.H.25 X X X X 22 424 X X X 21 3 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 47 41 4423 X X X 21 322 X X X X X X X 43 7 STANDARD DEVIATION: 7 6 7 M.P.H.21 X X X X 13 420 X X X X X X 15 6 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.87 0.74 0.4119 00 018 00 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.93 0.86 0.64 M.P.H.17 00 016 00 015 00 0 54 55 109

FAIRRADAR

CITY OF BANNING
TO

NICOLET STREET

CARLOSSUNNYDRY
416
DATE: 05/14/25 DAY: Wednesday TIME PERIOD: 2:08PM 2:39PM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SUNRISE AVE AND 8TH ST 65 00 064 00 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 2128 NICOLET ST63 00 062 00 061 00 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 35 MPH OBSERVER:60 00 059 00 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:58 00 057 00 0 ROAD SURFACE:56 00 055 00 0 ROAD CONDITION:54 00 053 00 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:52 00 051 00 050 00 049 00 048 00 047 00 046 00 045 00 044 00 043 X 10 1 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 00 041 00 040 00 0 85TH %: 32 30 31 M.P.H.
39 00 038 X 10 1 50TH %: 26 24 25 M.P.H.37 X X 20 236 X 10 1 15TH %: 20 19 19 M.P.H.35 X 10 1 *34 X X 11 2 * 10 MPH PACE: 22 - 31 21 - 30 21 - 30 M.P.H.33 X X 02 2 *32 X X X X 22 4 P % IN PACE: 62% 68% 64%31 X X X X X 32 5 A30 X X X X X X X 34 7 C % OVER PACE: 17% 11% 17%29 X X X X X X X X 44 8 E28 X X X X X X 24 6 * % UNDER PACE: 21% 21% 19%27 X X X X X X X X 44 8 *26 X X X X X X X X 44 8 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 26 25 25 M.P.H.25 X X X X X X X 34 724 X X X X X X X X X 45 9 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 38 22 3023 X X X X X X X X 26 822 X X X X X X 33 6 STANDARD DEVIATION: 6 5 5 M.P.H.21 X X X X X X 24 620 X X X X X 23 5 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.74 0.35 0.2619 X X X X 13 418 X X X X 13 4 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.86 0.59 0.51 M.P.H.17 X X X X X 23 516 X X X 21 315 X 10 1 52 62 114

FAIRRADAR

CITY OF BANNING
TO

NICOLET STREET

CARLOSSUNNYDRY
417
DATE: 05/15/25 DAY: Thursday TIME PERIOD: 9:00AM 10:12AM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): 8TH ST AND SAN GORGONIO AVE 65 00 064 00 0 OBSERVATION POINT: WEST OF 4TH ST63 00 062 00 061 00 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 35 MPH OBSERVER:60 00 059 00 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:58 00 057 00 0 ROAD SURFACE:56 00 055 00 0 ROAD CONDITION:54 00 053 00 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:52 00 051 00 050 00 049 00 048 00 047 00 046 X X 11 245 00 044 00 043 X 10 1 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 00 041 00 040 00 0 85TH %: 37 32 34 M.P.H.
39 X X 20 238 X X 20 2 50TH %: 30 29 30 M.P.H.37 X X X X 31 436 X 10 1 15TH %: 25 24 24 M.P.H.35 X X X X 31 4 *34 X X X X X X 42 6 * 10 MPH PACE: 26 - 35 24 - 33 26 - 35 M.P.H.33 X X X X X X 33 6 *32 X X X X X X 15 6 P % IN PACE: 64% 79% 70%31 X X X X X X X X 53 8 A30 X X X X X X X X X X X X 4 8 12 C % OVER PACE: 19% 9% 11%29 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 9 15 E28 X X X X X X 24 6 * % UNDER PACE: 17% 11% 19%27 X X X X X X X 43 7 *26 X X X X 22 4 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 31 29 30 M.P.H.25 X X X X 22 424 X X X X X X 33 6 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 33 21 2823 X 01 122 X X X X X 23 5 STANDARD DEVIATION: 6 5 5 M.P.H.21 00 020 00 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.62 0.40 0.2619 X X 11 218 X 01 1 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.79 0.63 0.51 M.P.H.17 X 10 116 00 015 00 0 53 53 106

FAIRRADAR

CITY OF BANNING
TO

NICOLET STREET

CARLOSSUNNYDRY
418
DATE: 05/15/25 DAY: Thursday TIME PERIOD: 10:17AM 11:06AM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SAN GORGONIO AVE AND HATHAWAY ST 65 00 064 00 0 OBSERVATION POINT: WEST OF DRURY LANE63 00 062 00 061 00 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 30 MPH OBSERVER:60 00 059 00 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:58 00 057 00 0 ROAD SURFACE:56 00 055 00 0 ROAD CONDITION:54 00 053 00 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:52 00 051 00 050 00 049 00 048 00 047 00 046 00 045 00 044 00 043 00 0 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 00 041 X X 11 240 00 0 85TH %: 34 36 35 M.P.H.
39 X 01 138 00 0 50TH %: 30 31 30 M.P.H.37 X 01 136 X X X X 22 4 15TH %: 19 28 24 M.P.H.35 X 01 1 *34 X X X 30 3 * 10 MPH PACE: 27 - 36 28 - 37 28 - 37 M.P.H.33 X X X 12 3 *32 X X X X X 32 5 P % IN PACE: 65% 81% 69%31 X X X X 22 4 A30 X X X X X X X X 44 8 C % OVER PACE: 3% 10% 6%29 X X X X 22 4 E28 X X X 21 3 * % UNDER PACE: 32% 10% 25%27 X 10 1 *26 X 10 1 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 28 32 30 M.P.H.25 X 10 124 X X X 21 3 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 38 21 3423 00 022 X 01 1 STANDARD DEVIATION: 6 5 6 M.P.H.21 00 020 X 10 1 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 1.23 0.98 0.6519 X 10 118 X X X 30 3 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 1.11 0.99 0.81 M.P.H.17 00 016 X 10 115 00 0 31 21 52

FAIRRADAR

CITY OF BANNING
TO

NICOLET STREET

CARLOSSUNNYDRY
419
DATE: 05/30/25 DAY: Friday TIME PERIOD: 9:12AM 10:09AM
FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): WILSON ST AND RAMSEY ST 65 00 064 00 0 OBSERVATION POINT: SOUTH OF AUTUMN GOLD63 00 062 00 061 00 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 35 MPH OBSERVER:60 00 059 00 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:58 00 057 00 0 ROAD SURFACE:56 00 055 00 0 ROAD CONDITION:54 00 053 00 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:52 00 051 00 050 00 049 00 048 00 047 00 046 00 045 00 044 00 043 00 0 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND42 00 041 X 01 140 X 10 1 85TH %: 36 35 36 M.P.H.39 X 01 138 X X X X 31 4 50TH %: 29 27 29 M.P.H.37 00 036 X X X X 40 4 15TH %: 23 22 23 M.P.H.35 X X X 12 3 *34 X X 11 2 * 10 MPH PACE: 22 - 31 24 - 33 22 - 31 M.P.H.33 X X 20 2 *32 X X 02 2 P % IN PACE: 63% 64% 63%31 00 0 A30 X X X 21 3 C % OVER PACE: 38% 21% 33%29 X X X X X X X X 53 8 E28 X X X X X 41 5 * % UNDER PACE: 0% 14% 3%27 X X X X X X 06 6 *26 X X 11 2 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 30 28 29 M.P.H.25 X X X 21 324 X X X 03 3 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 30 33 3123 X X X 30 322 X X X X X 32 5 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5 6 6 M.P.H.21 00 020 X 01 1 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.93 1.17 0.5219 00 018 00 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.96 1.08 0.72 M.P.H.17 X 01 116 00 015 00 0 32 28 60

FAIRRADAR

CITY OF BANNING
TO

OMAR STREET

CARLOSSUNNYDRY
420
DATE: 05/12/25 DAY: Monday TIME PERIOD: 12:04PM 12:23PM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): HIGHLAND SPRINGS AVE AND HIGHLAND HOME RD 65 00 064 00 0 OBSERVATION POINT: WEST OF APEX AVE63 00 062 00 061 00 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 45 MPH OBSERVER:60 00 059 00 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:58 00 057 00 0 ROAD SURFACE:56 00 055 00 0 ROAD CONDITION:54 X 01 153 00 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:52 00 051 X 01 150 X X X 12 349 X X X 03 348 00 047 X X X X X 05 546 X X 11 245 X X X X X 23 544 X X X X X X X X 26 843 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 3 11 14 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 X X X X X X X X X X 5 5 1041 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 9 1840 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 7 13 85TH %: 41 45 43 M.P.H. 39 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 10 1838 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 6 18 50TH %: 37 40 39 M.P.H.37 X X X X X X X X X X 6 4 1036 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 7 15 15TH %: 33 35 34 M.P.H.35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 9 22 *34 X X X X X X X X X X 7 3 10 * 10 MPH PACE: 33 - 42 35 - 44 34 - 43 M.P.H.33 X X X X X X X X X 72 9 *32 X X X X X 32 5 P % IN PACE: 81% 74% 74%31 X X 20 2 A30 X X X X X X 42 6 C % OVER PACE: 9% 16% 14%29 X 01 1 E28 X 10 1 * % UNDER PACE: 10% 10% 12%27 00 0 *26 00 0 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 37 40 39 M.P.H.25 00 024 00 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 16 24 2223 00 022 00 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 4 5 5 M.P.H.21 00 020 00 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.16 0.24 0.1119 00 018 00 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.40 0.49 0.33 M.P.H.17 00 016 00 015 00 0 100 100 200

FAIRRADAR

CITY OF BANNING
TO

RAMSEY STREET

CARLOSPARTLY SUNNDRY
421
DATE: 05/12/25 DAY: Monday TIME PERIOD: 11:29AM 11:53AM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): HIGHLAND HOME RD AND SUNSET AVE 65 00 064 00 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 3317 RAMSEY ST63 00 062 00 061 00 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 45 MPH OBSERVER:60 00 059 00 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:58 00 057 00 0 ROAD SURFACE:56 00 055 00 0 ROAD CONDITION:54 00 053 00 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:52 00 051 00 050 00 049 00 048 00 047 00 046 X X 02 245 X X X X 22 444 X X X X X X X X X X X 4 7 1143 X X X X X 23 5 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 7 1541 X X X X X X X X X 63 940 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 9 22 85TH %: 42 42 42 M.P.H. 39 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 5 1338 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 11 20 50TH %: 38 37 38 M.P.H.37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 5 1736 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 8 17 15TH %: 33 31 33 M.P.H.35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 8 17 *34 X X X X X X X 34 7 * 10 MPH PACE: 33 - 42 31 - 40 33 - 42 M.P.H.33 X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 4 12 *32 X X X X X X X X X X 3 7 10 P % IN PACE: 85% 68% 75%31 X X X X X X X X X X 3 7 10 A30 X X X X X X 06 6 C % OVER PACE: 8% 24% 11%29 X X X 12 3 E28 00 0 * % UNDER PACE: 7% 8% 15%27 00 0 *26 00 0 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 38 37 37 M.P.H.25 00 024 00 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 13 21 1723 00 022 00 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 4 5 4 M.P.H.21 00 020 00 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.13 0.21 0.0819 00 018 00 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.35 0.46 0.29 M.P.H.17 00 016 00 015 00 0 100 100 200

FAIRRADAR

CITY OF BANNING
TO

RAMSEY STREET

CARLOSPARTLY SUNNDRY
422
DATE: 05/12/25 DAY: Monday TIME PERIOD: 11:03AM 11:23AM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SUNSET AVE AND 22ND ST 65 00 064 00 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 2648 RAMSEY ST63 00 062 00 061 00 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 40 MPH OBSERVER:60 00 059 00 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:58 00 057 00 0 ROAD SURFACE:56 00 055 00 0 ROAD CONDITION:54 X 01 153 00 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:52 X X 20 251 X X 11 250 00 049 X 10 148 X X 20 247 X X X 21 346 X X X X X X X 43 745 X X X X X X 51 644 X X X X X X X X X X 7 3 1043 X X X X X X X X 71 8 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 11 2 1341 X X X X X X 42 640 X X X X X X X X X X X 5 6 11 85TH %: 45 40 44 M.P.H. 39 X X X X X X X X X X X X 4 8 1238 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 11 19 50TH %: 40 36 38 M.P.H.37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 10 1936 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 12 19 15TH %: 35 32 33 M.P.H.35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 8 16 *34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 3 10 13 * 10 MPH PACE: 35 - 44 32 - 41 34 - 43 M.P.H.33 X X X X X X X X 35 8 *32 X X X X X X X X X X 3 7 10 P % IN PACE: 70% 79% 68%31 X X X 12 3 A30 X X X 21 3 C % OVER PACE: 17% 13% 17%29 X X 02 2 E28 X X 11 2 * % UNDER PACE: 13% 8% 15%27 X X 02 2 *26 00 0 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 40 37 38 M.P.H.25 00 024 00 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 25 22 2623 00 022 00 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5 5 5 M.P.H.21 00 020 00 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.25 0.22 0.1319 00 018 00 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.50 0.47 0.36 M.P.H.17 00 016 00 015 00 0 100 100 200

FAIRRADAR

CITY OF BANNING
TO

RAMSEY STREET

CARLOSPARTLY SUNNDRY
423
DATE: 05/12/25 DAY: Monday TIME PERIOD: 10:39AM 10:59AM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): 22ND ST AND 8 TH ST 65 00 064 00 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 1601 RAMSEY ST63 00 062 X 10 161 00 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 40 MPH OBSERVER:60 00 059 00 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:58 00 057 00 0 ROAD SURFACE:56 00 055 00 0 ROAD CONDITION:54 X 10 153 00 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:52 X 10 151 00 050 X X 11 249 X X X 21 348 X X 11 247 X X X X X 32 546 X X X 12 345 X X 11 244 X X X X 22 443 X X X X 22 4 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 X X X X X X 33 641 X X X X X X X X X X X 8 3 1140 X X X X X X X X X 54 9 85TH %: 43 41 42 M.P.H. 39 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 9 1538 X X X X X X X X X 36 9 50TH %: 37 37 37 M.P.H.37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 14 2736 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 10 18 15TH %: 32 32 32 M.P.H.35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 11 9 20 *34 X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 6 12 * 10 MPH PACE: 32 - 41 32 - 41 32 - 41 M.P.H.33 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 7 13 *32 X X X X X X X X X X 5 5 10 P % IN PACE: 71% 73% 72%31 X X X X 13 4 A30 X X X X X X X 34 7 C % OVER PACE: 19% 15% 17%29 X X X X X X 42 6 E28 X X X X 22 4 * % UNDER PACE: 10% 12% 11%27 00 0 *26 X 01 1 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 38 37 37 M.P.H.25 00 024 00 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 35 23 2923 00 022 00 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 6 5 5 M.P.H.21 00 020 00 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.35 0.23 0.1519 00 018 00 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.59 0.48 0.38 M.P.H.17 00 016 00 015 00 0 100 100 200

FAIRRADAR

CITY OF BANNING
TO

RAMSEY STREET

CARLOSPARTLY SUNNDRY
424
DATE: 05/12/25 DAY: Monday TIME PERIOD: 9:02AM 9:46AM
FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): 8TH ST AND HARGRAVE ST 65 00 064 00 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 590 RAMSEY ST63 00 062 00 061 00 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 25 MPH OBSERVER:60 00 059 00 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:58 00 057 00 0 ROAD SURFACE:56 00 055 00 0 ROAD CONDITION:54 00 053 00 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:52 00 051 00 050 00 049 00 048 00 047 00 046 X X 02 245 00 044 X 10 143 X 10 1 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 X X X 12 341 X X X X 31 440 X X 11 2 85TH %: 36 36 36 M.P.H. 39 X X X 21 338 X X X X 13 4 50TH %: 32 32 32 M.P.H.37 X X X X X X X X X X 5 5 1036 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 4 9 13 15TH %: 28 27 28 M.P.H.35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 8 15 *34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 10 18 * 10 MPH PACE: 28 - 37 28 - 37 28 - 37 M.P.H.33 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 6 14 *32 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 10 25 P % IN PACE: 77% 75% 76%31 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 7 16 A30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 11 10 21 C % OVER PACE: 10% 10% 10%29 X X X X X X X X X X X 6 5 11 E28 X X X X X X X X X 45 9 * % UNDER PACE: 13% 15% 14%27 X X X X X X X 34 7 *26 X X X X X X 15 6 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 32 32 32 M.P.H.25 X 10 124 X X X X X 32 5 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 21 23 2223 X X X X 22 422 X X 20 2 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5 5 5 M.P.H.21 X 10 120 X X 02 2 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.21 0.23 0.1119 00 018 00 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.46 0.48 0.33 M.P.H.17 00 016 00 015 00 0 100 100 200

FAIRRADAR

CITY OF BANNING
TO

RAMSEY STREET

CARLOSPARTLY SUNNDRY

MARTIN ST
425
DATE: 05/12/25 DAY: Monday TIME PERIOD: 9:02AM 9:46AM
FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): 8TH ST AND HARGRAVE ST 65 00 064 00 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 590 RAMSEY ST63 00 062 00 061 00 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 25 MPH OBSERVER:60 00 059 00 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:58 00 057 00 0 ROAD SURFACE:56 00 055 00 0 ROAD CONDITION:54 00 053 00 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:52 00 051 00 050 00 049 00 048 00 047 00 046 X X 02 245 00 044 X 10 143 X 10 1 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 X X X 12 341 X X X X 31 440 X X 11 2 85TH %: 36 36 36 M.P.H. 39 X X X 21 338 X X X X 13 4 50TH %: 32 32 32 M.P.H.37 X X X X X X X X X X 5 5 1036 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 4 9 13 15TH %: 28 27 28 M.P.H.35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 8 15 *34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 10 18 * 10 MPH PACE: 28 - 37 28 - 37 28 - 37 M.P.H.33 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 6 14 *32 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 10 25 P % IN PACE: 77% 75% 76%31 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 7 16 A30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 11 10 21 C % OVER PACE: 10% 10% 10%29 X X X X X X X X X X X 6 5 11 E28 X X X X X X X X X 45 9 * % UNDER PACE: 13% 15% 14%27 X X X X X X X 34 7 *26 X X X X X X 15 6 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 32 32 32 M.P.H.25 X 10 124 X X X X X 32 5 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 21 23 2223 X X X X 22 422 X X 20 2 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5 5 5 M.P.H.21 X 10 120 X X 02 2 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.21 0.23 0.1119 00 018 00 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.46 0.48 0.33 M.P.H.17 00 016 00 015 00 0 100 100 200

FAIRRADAR

CITY OF BANNING
TO

RAMSEY STREET

CARLOSPARTLY SUNNDRY

MARTIN ST AND HARGRAVE ST
426
DATE: 05/12/25 DAY: Monday TIME PERIOD: 9:52AM 10:31AM
FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): HARGRAVE ST AND HATHAWAY ST 65 00 064 00 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 932 RAMSEY ST63 00 062 00 061 00 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 40 MPH OBSERVER:60 00 059 00 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:58 00 057 00 0 ROAD SURFACE:56 00 055 00 0 ROAD CONDITION:54 00 053 00 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:52 00 051 00 050 00 049 00 048 00 047 X X 11 246 X X X 21 345 X 01 144 X 10 143 X X X 12 3 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 X X X X 13 441 X X 11 240 X X X X X X X 25 7 85TH %: 38 39 39 M.P.H. 39 X X X X X X X X 53 838 X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 3 12 50TH %: 33 33 33 M.P.H.37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 9 1636 X X X X X X X X X 36 9 15TH %: 28 27 27 M.P.H.35 X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 4 12 *34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 9 16 * 10 MPH PACE: 29 - 38 29 - 38 29 - 38 M.P.H.33 X X X X X X X X X X X 5 6 11 *32 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 9 17 P % IN PACE: 68% 62% 65%31 X X X X X X X X 53 8 A30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 8 17 C % OVER PACE: 14% 17% 16%29 X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 5 12 E28 X X X X X X X 43 7 * % UNDER PACE: 18% 21% 20%27 X X X X X X X X X X X X 4 8 12 *26 X X X X X X X X 62 8 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 33 33 33 M.P.H.25 X X X X X X X 34 724 X 01 1 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 28 33 3023 00 022 00 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5 6 5 M.P.H.21 00 020 X 01 1 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.28 0.33 0.1519 X 01 118 X 10 1 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.53 0.57 0.39 M.P.H.17 X 01 116 00 015 00 0 100 100 200

FAIRRADAR

CITY OF BANNING
TO

RAMSEY STREET

CARLOSPARTLY SUNNDRY
427
DATE: 05/28/25 DAY: Wednesday TIME PERIOD: 9:37AM 10:41AM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): BLUFF ST AND WILSON ST 65 00 064 00 0 OBSERVATION POINT: NORTH OF THEODORE ST63 00 062 00 061 00 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 30 MPH OBSERVER:60 00 059 00 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:58 00 057 00 0 ROAD SURFACE:56 00 055 00 0 ROAD CONDITION:54 00 053 00 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:52 00 051 00 050 00 049 00 048 X 01 147 00 046 00 045 00 044 00 043 00 0 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND42 00 041 X 01 140 X 01 1 85TH %: 32 34 33 M.P.H.39 00 038 00 0 50TH %: 29 29 29 M.P.H.37 X 01 136 X 10 1 15TH %: 26 24 26 M.P.H.35 X 01 1 *34 X X 02 2 * 10 MPH PACE: 27 - 36 26 - 35 26 - 35 M.P.H.33 X X X X X 14 5 *32 X X X 21 3 P % IN PACE: 86% 72% 77%31 X X X X X 23 5 A30 X X X X X 32 5 C % OVER PACE: 0% 11% 9%29 X X X X X X X X X 45 9 E28 X X X X 22 4 * % UNDER PACE: 14% 17% 14%27 X X X X X X X 34 7 *26 X X X 12 3 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 29 30 30 M.P.H.25 X 01 124 X X 02 2 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 10 36 2623 X 10 122 X X 11 2 STANDARD DEVIATION: 3 6 5 M.P.H.21 00 020 00 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.48 0.99 0.4619 00 018 X 01 1 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.69 1.00 0.68 M.P.H.17 X 01 116 00 015 00 0 21 36 57

FAIRRADAR

CITY OF BANNING
TO

SAN GORGONIO AVENUE

CARLOSCLOUDYDRY
428
DATE: 05/23/25 DAY: Friday TIME PERIOD: 2:45PM 3:46PM
FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): WILSON ST AND RAMSEY ST 65 00 064 00 0 OBSERVATION POINT: SOUTH OF GEORGE ST63 00 062 00 061 00 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 25 MPH OBSERVER:60 00 059 00 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:58 00 057 00 0 ROAD SURFACE:56 00 055 00 0 ROAD CONDITION:54 00 053 00 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:52 00 051 00 050 00 049 00 048 00 047 00 046 00 045 00 044 00 043 00 0 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND42 00 041 00 040 00 0 85TH %: 30 31 30 M.P.H.39 00 038 00 0 50TH %: 23 25 24 M.P.H.37 00 036 00 0 15TH %: 16 18 17 M.P.H.35 X 01 1 *34 X X 11 2 * 10 MPH PACE: 21 - 30 21 - 30 21 - 30 M.P.H.33 X 10 1 *32 X X X X X 23 5 P % IN PACE: 57% 61% 59%31 X X X X 22 4 A30 X X X X X X X X 35 8 C % OVER PACE: 11% 13% 12%29 X X X X X 23 5 E28 X X X X X X 24 6 * % UNDER PACE: 32% 26% 29%27 X X X X X 41 5 *26 X X X X X X X X X 45 9 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 23 25 24 M.P.H.25 X X X X X X X 34 724 X X X X X 23 5 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 29 28 2823 X X X X X X X X X 72 922 X X X X X 23 5 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5 5 5 M.P.H.21 X X X X X X 33 620 X X X X X 23 5 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.52 0.49 0.2619 X X X X X 23 518 X X X X X 32 5 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.72 0.70 0.51 M.P.H.17 X X X X X 32 516 X X X X X X 42 615 X X X X X X 42 6 56 54 110

FAIRRADAR

CITY OF BANNING
TO

SAN GORGONIO AVENUE

CARLOSPARTLY SUNNDRY
429
DATE: 05/23/25 DAY: Friday TIME PERIOD: 2:08PM 2:39PM
FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): RAMSEY ST AND LINCOLN ST 65 00 064 00 0 OBSERVATION POINT: NORTH OF BRYANT ST63 00 062 00 061 00 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 30 MPH OBSERVER:60 00 059 00 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:58 00 057 00 0 ROAD SURFACE:56 00 055 00 0 ROAD CONDITION:54 00 053 00 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:52 00 051 00 050 00 049 00 048 00 047 00 046 00 045 00 044 00 043 00 0 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND42 00 041 00 040 00 0 85TH %: 26 30 25 M.P.H.39 00 038 00 0 50TH %: 21 21 21 M.P.H.37 00 036 00 0 15TH %: 17 15 16 M.P.H.35 00 0 *34 00 0 * 10 MPH PACE: 15 - 24 15 - 24 15 - 24 M.P.H.33 X 10 1 *32 X 10 1 P % IN PACE: 80% 85% 82%31 X 10 1 A30 X X 11 2 C % OVER PACE: 20% 15% 18%29 X X X X 22 4 E28 X 01 1 * % UNDER PACE: 0% 0% 0%27 X X X 21 3 *26 X X X X X 41 5 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 22 20 21 M.P.H.25 X X X 12 324 X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 6 12 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 19 18 1923 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 5 1422 X X X X X X 33 6 STANDARD DEVIATION: 4 4 4 M.P.H.21 X X X X X X X X 53 820 X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 4 12 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.30 0.29 0.1619 X X X X X X X 34 718 X X X X X X X X 44 8 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.54 0.54 0.40 M.P.H.17 X X X X X X X X X 63 916 X X X X X X X 34 715 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 4 9 13 64 53 117

FAIRRADAR

CITY OF BANNING
TO

SAN GORGONIO AVENUE

CARLOSPARTLY SUNNDRY
430
DATE: 05/27/25 DAY: Tuesday TIME PERIOD: 10:50AM 11:25AM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): HIGHLAND SPRINGS AVE AND HIGHLAND HOME RD 65 00 064 00 0 OBSERVATION POINT: WEST OF SILVER LAKES AVE63 00 062 00 061 00 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 35 MPH OBSERVER:60 00 059 00 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:58 00 057 00 0 ROAD SURFACE:56 00 055 00 0 ROAD CONDITION:54 00 053 00 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:52 00 051 00 050 00 049 00 048 00 047 00 046 00 045 X 10 144 X 10 143 00 0 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 00 041 X 10 140 X 10 1 85TH %: 36 36 36 M.P.H.
39 X X 11 238 X X 02 2 50TH %: 32 31 32 M.P.H.37 X X X X X 23 536 X X X X X 23 5 15TH %: 28 26 27 M.P.H.35 X X X X X X X X X 36 9 *34 X X X X X X X X 44 8 * 10 MPH PACE: 28 - 37 28 - 37 28 - 37 M.P.H.33 X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 4 12 *32 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 4 13 P % IN PACE: 80% 73% 76%31 X X X X X X X X X X 3 7 10 A30 X X X X X X X X X X X 7 4 11 C % OVER PACE: 9% 5% 7%29 X X X X 22 4 E28 X X X X X X 33 6 * % UNDER PACE: 11% 22% 17%27 X X X X X 23 5 *26 X X X X X 23 5 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 32 31 32 M.P.H.25 X X X X 22 424 X X 02 2 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 18 18 1823 00 022 X X 02 2 STANDARD DEVIATION: 4 4 4 M.P.H.21 00 020 00 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.33 0.33 0.1719 00 018 00 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.58 0.58 0.41 M.P.H.17 00 016 00 015 00 0 54 55 109

FAIRRADAR

CITY OF BANNING
TO

SUN LAKES BOULEVARD

CARLOSPRTLY SUNNYDRY
431
DATE: 05/30/25 DAY: Friday TIME PERIOD: 11:11AM 12:34PM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): WILSON ST AND NICOLET ST 65 00 064 00 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 661 SUNRISE AVE63 00 062 00 061 00 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: NOT POSTED OBSERVER:60 00 059 00 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:58 00 057 00 0 ROAD SURFACE:56 00 055 00 0 ROAD CONDITION:54 00 053 00 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:52 00 051 00 050 00 049 00 048 00 047 X 10 146 X 10 145 X 01 144 00 043 00 0 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND42 00 041 00 040 00 0 85TH %: 34 34 34 M.P.H.39 00 038 X 10 1 50TH %: 32 31 32 M.P.H.37 X 10 136 00 0 15TH %: 29 28 29 M.P.H.35 X X 11 2 *34 X X X X X 32 5 * 10 MPH PACE: 28 - 37 26 - 35 26 - 35 M.P.H.33 X X X X X X X X X 63 9 *32 X X X X X X X X 44 8 P % IN PACE: 87% 95% 91%31 X X X X 22 4 A30 X X X X X X 33 6 C % OVER PACE: 10% 5% 9%29 X X X X X X X 52 7 E28 X X X X X 23 5 * % UNDER PACE: 3% 0% 0%27 00 0 *26 X X 11 2 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 33 32 32 M.P.H.25 00 024 00 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 21 14 1823 00 022 00 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5 4 4 M.P.H.21 00 020 00 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.67 0.65 0.3419 00 018 00 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.82 0.81 0.58 M.P.H.17 00 016 00 015 00 0 31 22 53

FAIRRADAR

CITY OF BANNING
TO

SUNRISE AVENUE

CARLOSSUNNYDRY
432
DATE: 05/29/25 DAY: Thursday TIME PERIOD: 9:33AM 10:35AM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): WALLING DR AND WILSON ST 65 00 064 00 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 1/4 MILE NORTH OF WILSON ST63 00 062 00 061 00 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 40 MPH OBSERVER:60 00 059 00 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:58 00 057 00 0 ROAD SURFACE:56 00 055 00 0 ROAD CONDITION:54 00 053 00 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:52 00 051 00 050 X 10 149 00 048 00 047 00 046 00 045 X X 11 244 X 01 143 X X 11 2 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND42 X X 20 241 X 10 140 X X X X X X X 43 7 85TH %: 42 40 40 M.P.H.39 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 4 9 1338 X X X X X X X X 53 8 50TH %: 38 38 38 M.P.H.37 X X X X X X 24 636 X X X 12 3 15TH %: 35 34 35 M.P.H.35 X X X X X X X 34 7 *34 X X X X X 23 5 * 10 MPH PACE: 34 - 43 31 - 40 34 - 43 M.P.H.33 X 01 1 *32 00 0 P % IN PACE: 89% 91% 89%31 X X 11 2 A30 00 0 C % OVER PACE: 7% 9% 7%29 00 0 E28 00 0 * % UNDER PACE: 4% 0% 5%27 00 0 *26 00 0 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 39 38 38 M.P.H.25 00 024 00 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 14 9 1223 00 022 00 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 4 3 3 M.P.H.21 00 020 00 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.50 0.28 0.1919 00 018 00 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.71 0.53 0.44 M.P.H.17 00 016 00 015 00 0 28 33 61

FAIRRADAR

CITY OF BANNING
TO

SUNSET AVENUE

CARLOSPRTLY SUNNYDRY

NOT POSTED
433
DATE: 05/29/25 DAY: Thursday TIME PERIOD: 9:13AM 9:29AM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): WILSON ST AND RAMSEY ST 65 00 064 X 10 1 OBSERVATION POINT: 316 SUNSET AVE63 00 062 00 061 X 01 1 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 40 MPH OBSERVER:60 00 059 00 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:58 00 057 00 0 ROAD SURFACE:56 00 055 00 0 ROAD CONDITION:54 00 053 X 10 1 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:52 00 051 X 01 150 00 049 X X X X 22 448 X X 11 247 X X X X X X 15 646 X 10 145 X X X X 13 444 X X X X X X 15 643 X X X X X 23 5 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND42 X X X X X X X X X X X 6 5 1141 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 7 1440 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 7 15 85TH %: 43 45 45 M.P.H.39 X X X X X X X X X 36 938 X X X X X X X X X X X 8 3 11 50TH %: 38 40 40 M.P.H.37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 5 1336 X X X 12 3 15TH %: 34 35 34 M.P.H.35 X X X X 22 4 *34 X X X X X X X 61 7 * 10 MPH PACE: 34 - 43 36 - 45 34 - 43 M.P.H.33 X X X X 22 4 *32 X X 02 2 P % IN PACE: 73% 70% 68%31 X 01 1 A30 X 10 1 C % OVER PACE: 13% 15% 20%29 X X 02 2 E28 X X 20 2 * % UNDER PACE: 14% 15% 13%27 X 10 1 *26 X 10 1 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 39 41 40 M.P.H.25 X X 20 224 00 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 43 30 3823 X 10 122 00 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 7 5 6 M.P.H.21 00 020 00 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.61 0.45 0.2819 00 018 00 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.78 0.67 0.53 M.P.H.17 00 016 00 015 00 0 70 66 136

FAIRRADAR

CITY OF BANNING
TO

SUNSET AVENUE

CARLOSPRTLY SUNNYDRY
434
DATE: 05/29/25 DAY: Thursday TIME PERIOD: 8:05AM 9:08AM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): RAMSEY ST AND WESTWARD AVE 65 00 064 00 0 OBSERVATION POINT: SOUTH OF JEFFERSON ST63 00 062 00 061 00 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 35 MPH OBSERVER:60 00 059 00 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:58 00 057 00 0 ROAD SURFACE:56 00 055 00 0 ROAD CONDITION:54 00 053 00 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:52 00 051 00 050 00 049 00 048 00 047 00 046 X 10 145 X 10 144 00 043 00 0 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND42 X 01 141 X 01 140 00 0 85TH %: 36 36 36 M.P.H.39 X X X 12 338 X 01 1 50TH %: 31 32 31 M.P.H.37 X X X 30 336 X X X X X X X X 44 8 15TH %: 26 28 27 M.P.H.35 X X X X X X X 16 7 *34 X X X X 22 4 * 10 MPH PACE: 25 - 34 27 - 36 27 - 36 M.P.H.33 X X X X X X X X X X 7 3 10 *32 X X X X X X X X X X X 5 6 11 P % IN PACE: 78% 80% 77%31 X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 4 12 A30 X X X X X X X X X 54 9 C % OVER PACE: 20% 10% 10%29 X X X X X X X X X X 4 6 10 E28 X X X X X X X 34 7 * % UNDER PACE: 2% 10% 12%27 X X X X 22 4 *26 X X X X X X X 52 7 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 32 32 32 M.P.H.25 X X X 21 324 X 01 1 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 20 18 1923 X 01 122 X 10 1 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5 4 4 M.P.H.21 00 020 00 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.37 0.35 0.1819 00 018 00 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.61 0.59 0.42 M.P.H.17 00 016 00 015 00 0 55 51 106

FAIRRADAR

CITY OF BANNING
TO

SUNSET AVENUE

CARLOSPRTLY SUNNYDRY
435
DATE: 06/02/25 DAY: Monday TIME PERIOD: 11:25AM 1:25PM
FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SAN GORGONIO AVE AND HATHAWAY ST 65 00 064 00 0 OBSERVATION POINT: EAST OF FLORIDA ST63 00 062 00 061 00 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 35 MPH OBSERVER:60 00 059 00 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:58 00 057 00 0 ROAD SURFACE:56 00 055 00 0 ROAD CONDITION:54 00 053 00 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:52 00 051 00 050 00 049 00 048 00 047 00 046 00 045 00 044 00 043 00 0 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 00 041 00 040 00 0 85TH %: 33 34 34 M.P.H.
39 00 038 00 0 50TH %: 32 31 31 M.P.H.37 00 036 X X 11 2 15TH %: 27 26 27 M.P.H.35 X X 20 2 *34 X 01 1 * 10 MPH PACE: 27 - 36 28 - 37 27 - 36 M.P.H.33 X X X X 40 4 *32 X X X X 22 4 P % IN PACE: 88% 89% 88%31 X X 11 2 A30 X X 20 2 C % OVER PACE: 0% 0% 0%29 X X 02 2 E28 X X X 21 3 * % UNDER PACE: 12% 11% 12%27 X 10 1 *26 X X 11 2 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 31 31 31 M.P.H.25 00 024 00 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 12 10 1123 X 10 122 00 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 4 3 3 M.P.H.21 00 020 00 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.73 1.08 0.4319 00 018 00 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.86 1.04 0.65 M.P.H.17 00 016 00 015 00 0 17 9 26

FAIRRADAR

CITY OF BANNING
TO

WESLEY STREET

CARLOSPRTLY SUNNYDRY
436
DATE: 05/23/25 DAY: Friday TIME PERIOD: 9:39AM 10:41AM
FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SUNSET AVE AND 22ND ST 65 00 064 00 0 OBSERVATION POINT: WEST OF WOODLAND AVE63 00 062 00 061 00 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 40 MPH OBSERVER:60 00 059 00 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:58 00 057 00 0 ROAD SURFACE:56 00 055 00 0 ROAD CONDITION:54 X 10 153 X 01 1 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:52 00 051 X 10 150 00 049 00 048 X 01 147 X X X 21 346 X X 20 245 X X X X 31 444 X X 02 243 X X X X X 23 5 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 X X 20 241 X X 11 240 X X X X X 50 5 85TH %: 46 45 45 M.P.H. 39 X X X X X 14 538 X 10 1 50TH %: 40 37 39 M.P.H.37 X X X X X 23 536 X 10 1 15TH %: 30 24 26 M.P.H.35 X X 02 2 *34 00 0 * 10 MPH PACE: 38 - 47 35 - 44 37 - 46 M.P.H.33 00 0 *32 X 01 1 P % IN PACE: 66% 48% 55%31 X 10 1 A30 X X X 12 3 C % OVER PACE: 7% 13% 12%29 X X 11 2 E28 X 01 1 * % UNDER PACE: 28% 39% 33%27 00 0 *26 X 01 1 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 39 35 37 M.P.H.25 00 024 X X 02 2 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 78 106 9723 00 022 00 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 9 10 10 M.P.H.21 00 020 00 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 2.67 3.22 1.6119 00 018 00 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 1.64 1.79 1.27 M.P.H.17 00 016 X X 02 215 X X X X 22 4 29 31 60

FAIRRADAR

CITY OF BANNING
TO

WESTWARD AVENUE

CARLOSPARTLY SUNNDRY
437
DATE: 05/23/25 DAY: Friday TIME PERIOD: 8:33AM 9:35AM
FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): 22ND ST AND 8TH ST 65 00 064 X 01 1 OBSERVATION POINT: 1027 WESTWARD AVE63 00 062 00 061 00 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 35 MPH OBSERVER:60 X 10 159 X 10 1 COMMENTS: WEATHER:58 X X 20 257 X 10 1 ROAD SURFACE:56 00 055 00 0 ROAD CONDITION:54 00 053 X X 11 2 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:52 X 01 151 X 10 150 X X 20 249 00 048 X X X 30 347 X X X X X X 51 646 X X 20 245 X X X X X X 33 644 X X X 03 343 X X X X X X 51 6 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 X X X X 22 441 X X X X X X X 43 740 X X X X X X 42 6 85TH %: 50 44 47 M.P.H. 39 X X X X 13 438 X X X X 31 4 50TH %: 42 37 40 M.P.H.37 X X X X X X X 25 736 X X X X X 32 5 15TH %: 35 28 32 M.P.H.35 X X X X 22 4 *34 X X X X X X 15 6 * 10 MPH PACE: 39 - 48 33 - 42 34 - 43 M.P.H.33 X X X X X 32 5 *32 X X 02 2 P % IN PACE: 54% 51% 50%31 X X X X 22 4 A30 X X 02 2 C % OVER PACE: 17% 21% 30%29 X 01 1 E28 X 01 1 * % UNDER PACE: 30% 28% 21%27 X 01 1 *26 X X X 03 3 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 43 37 40 M.P.H.25 X X 02 224 X 01 1 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 53 61 6623 00 022 00 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 7 8 8 M.P.H.21 00 020 00 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.98 1.16 0.6219 00 018 00 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.99 1.07 0.79 M.P.H.17 00 016 00 015 00 0 54 53 107

FAIRRADAR

CITY OF BANNING
TO

WESTWARD AVENUE

CARLOSPARTLY SUNNDRY
40 438
DATE: 05/23/25 DAY: Friday TIME PERIOD: 8:15AM 8:30AM
FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): 8TH ST AND SAN GORGONIO AVE 65 00 064 00 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 519 WESTWARD AVE63 00 062 00 061 00 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 35 MPH OBSERVER:60 00 059 00 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:58 00 057 00 0 ROAD SURFACE:56 00 055 00 0 ROAD CONDITION:54 00 053 00 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:52 00 051 00 050 00 049 00 048 X 10 147 X 10 146 00 045 00 044 00 043 X 01 1 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 00 041 X X X 21 340 X X X X 40 4 85TH %: 38 38 38 M.P.H. 39 X X X 30 338 X X X X X X X X X X X X 4 8 12 50TH %: 33 33 33 M.P.H.37 X X X X X X X X X 81 936 X X X X X X X X 53 8 15TH %: 28 27 28 M.P.H.35 X X X X X X X 16 7 *34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 5 13 * 10 MPH PACE: 31 - 40 29 - 38 29 - 38 M.P.H.33 X X X X X X X X X X X 6 5 11 *32 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 4 14 P % IN PACE: 74% 71% 71%31 X X X X X X X X X 72 9 A30 X X X X X X 33 6 C % OVER PACE: 5% 4% 10%29 X X X X X 23 5 E28 X X X X X X X X X 36 9 * % UNDER PACE: 21% 25% 19%27 X X X X X 23 5 *26 X X X X X 41 5 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 34 32 33 M.P.H.25 X 01 124 X X X 12 3 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 24 21 2323 X 01 122 00 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5 5 5 M.P.H.21 00 020 X 10 1 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.31 0.37 0.1719 00 018 00 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.56 0.61 0.42 M.P.H.17 00 016 00 015 00 0 76 56 132

FAIRRADAR

CITY OF BANNING
TO

WESTWARD AVENUE

CARLOSPARTLY SUNNDRY

NOT POSTED
439
DATE: 05/15/25 DAY: Thursday TIME PERIOD: 2:42PM 4:42PM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): HATHAWAY ST AND EAST END 65 00 064 00 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 1910 WESTWARD AVE63 00 062 00 061 00 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: NOT POSTED OBSERVER:60 00 059 00 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:58 00 057 00 0 ROAD SURFACE:56 00 055 00 0 ROAD CONDITION:54 00 053 00 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:52 00 051 00 050 00 049 00 048 00 047 00 046 00 045 00 044 00 043 X 01 1 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 X 10 141 X 01 140 X 10 1 85TH %: 35 38 37 M.P.H.
39 00 038 X 01 1 50TH %: 30 32 32 M.P.H.37 X 01 136 X X 02 2 15TH %: 18 20 20 M.P.H.35 X X X 30 3 *34 X X X X 13 4 * 10 MPH PACE: 33 - 42 30 - 39 27 - 36 M.P.H.33 X X 20 2 *32 X 01 1 P % IN PACE: 50% 58% 54%31 00 0 A30 X X X X 13 4 C % OVER PACE: 0% 11% 17%29 00 0 E28 00 0 * % UNDER PACE: 50% 32% 29%27 X X X 12 3 *26 00 0 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 29 31 30 M.P.H.25 00 024 X 10 1 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 63 56 5823 X X 11 222 00 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 8 7 8 M.P.H.21 00 020 X X X X 22 4 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 3.95 2.79 1.6619 00 018 X 10 1 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 1.99 1.67 1.29 M.P.H.17 X 10 116 00 015 X 01 1 16 19 35

FAIRRADAR

CITY OF BANNING
TO

WESTWARD AVENUE

CARLOSSUNNYDRY
440
DATE: 05/29/25 DAY: Thursday TIME PERIOD: 10:42AM 11:34AM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SUNSET AVE AND SUNRISE AVE 65 00 064 00 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 3040 WILLIAMS ST63 00 062 00 061 00 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 25 MPH OBSERVER:60 X 01 159 00 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:58 00 057 00 0 ROAD SURFACE:56 00 055 00 0 ROAD CONDITION:54 00 053 00 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:52 00 051 00 050 00 049 00 048 00 047 00 046 00 045 X X X X 13 444 00 043 X 01 1 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 X X X X 13 441 X X X 12 340 X X X 30 3 85TH %: 36 41 39 M.P.H. 39 X X X X X X X X 17 838 X X 02 2 50TH %: 29 35 33 M.P.H.37 X X X X 04 436 X X X X X X X X X 45 9 15TH %: 26 28 27 M.P.H.35 X X X X X X X X X 18 9 *34 X X X X X 23 5 * 10 MPH PACE: 25 - 34 30 - 39 26 - 35 M.P.H.33 X X X X X X X 52 7 *32 X X X X X X X 34 7 P % IN PACE: 75% 66% 61%31 X X X 12 3 A30 X X X X X X 24 6 C % OVER PACE: 23% 16% 34%29 X X X X X X X X 62 8 E28 X X X X X X X X 44 8 * % UNDER PACE: 2% 18% 4%27 X X X X X X 42 6 *26 X X X X X X X X X X X 8 3 11 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 31 35 33 M.P.H.25 X X X X 40 424 00 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 28 36 3623 X 10 122 00 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5 6 6 M.P.H.21 00 020 00 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.53 0.57 0.3219 00 018 00 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.73 0.76 0.56 M.P.H.17 00 016 00 015 00 0 52 62 114

FAIRRADAR

CITY OF BANNING
TO

WILLIAMS STREET

CARLOSPRTLY SUNNYDRY
441
DATE: 05/29/25 DAY: Thursday TIME PERIOD: 11:39AM 12:47PM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SUNRISE AVE AND 4TH ST 65 00 064 00 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 2170 WILLIAMS ST63 00 062 00 061 00 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 25 MPH OBSERVER:60 00 059 00 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:58 00 057 00 0 ROAD SURFACE:56 00 055 00 0 ROAD CONDITION:54 00 053 00 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:52 00 051 00 050 00 049 00 048 00 047 00 046 00 045 00 044 00 043 00 0 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 00 041 X X 20 240 X 10 1 85TH %: 32 30 31 M.P.H.
39 X X 20 238 00 0 50TH %: 28 26 27 M.P.H.37 00 036 X X 11 2 15TH %: 24 23 24 M.P.H.35 X X 11 2 *34 X 10 1 * 10 MPH PACE: 23 - 32 22 - 31 22 - 31 M.P.H.33 X 01 1 *32 X X X 21 3 P % IN PACE: 83% 88% 84%31 X X X X X X X X 62 8 A30 X X X X X X X 25 7 C % OVER PACE: 15% 8% 13%29 X X X X X X X X X X 6 4 10 E28 X X X X X X X X X X X X 5 7 12 * % UNDER PACE: 2% 4% 3%27 X X X X X X 24 6 *26 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 6 14 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 29 27 28 M.P.H.25 X X X X X X X X X X 6 4 1024 X X X X X X X X X X X 4 7 11 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 23 12 1923 X X X X X X 33 622 X X X X 04 4 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5 3 4 M.P.H.21 X X X 12 320 00 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.44 0.23 0.1819 00 018 00 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.66 0.48 0.42 M.P.H.17 00 016 00 015 00 0 53 52 105

FAIRRADAR

CITY OF BANNING
TO

WILLIAMS STREET

CARLOSPRTLY SUNNYDRY
442
DATE: 05/29/25 DAY: Thursday TIME PERIOD: 12:51PM 2:39PM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): 4TH ST AND MURRAY ST 65 00 064 00 0 OBSERVATION POINT: EAST OF 3RD ST63 00 062 00 061 00 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 25 MPH OBSERVER:60 00 059 00 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:58 00 057 00 0 ROAD SURFACE:56 00 055 00 0 ROAD CONDITION:54 00 053 00 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:52 00 051 00 050 00 049 00 048 00 047 00 046 00 045 00 044 00 043 00 0 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 00 041 00 040 00 0 85TH %: 26 25 25 M.P.H.
39 00 038 00 0 50TH %: 23 21 22 M.P.H.37 00 036 00 0 15TH %: 20 19 19 M.P.H.35 00 0 *34 00 0 * 10 MPH PACE: 20 - 29 18 - 27 18 - 27 M.P.H.33 00 0 *32 00 0 P % IN PACE: 85% 96% 91%31 00 0 A30 X 10 1 C % OVER PACE: 4% 0% 4%29 X 10 1 E28 00 0 * % UNDER PACE: 11% 4% 5%27 X X X 21 3 *26 X X X 21 3 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 23 22 22 M.P.H.25 X X X X X X X X X 45 924 X X X X 22 4 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 12 8 1023 X X X X 40 422 X X X 12 3 STANDARD DEVIATION: 3 3 3 M.P.H.21 X X X X X X X X X X 5 5 1020 X X X X X X X X 26 8 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.44 0.29 0.1919 X X X X 13 418 X X 02 2 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.66 0.54 0.44 M.P.H.17 00 016 X X 20 215 X 01 1 27 28 55

FAIRRADAR

CITY OF BANNING
TO

WILLIAMS STREET

CARLOSPRTLY SUNNYDRY
443
DATE: 05/29/25 DAY: Thursday TIME PERIOD: 2:44PM 4:07PM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): MURRAY ST AND HATHAWAY ST 65 00 064 00 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 605 WILLIAMS ST63 00 062 00 061 00 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 25 MPH OBSERVER:60 00 059 00 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:58 00 057 00 0 ROAD SURFACE:56 00 055 00 0 ROAD CONDITION:54 00 053 00 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:52 00 051 00 050 00 049 00 048 00 047 00 046 00 045 00 044 X X 20 243 00 0 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 X X X 30 341 X X 20 240 00 0 85TH %: 38 33 35 M.P.H. 39 X 01 138 X X X X 40 4 50TH %: 31 29 30 M.P.H.37 X X X X 22 436 00 0 15TH %: 26 24 25 M.P.H.35 X X X X X X 42 6 *34 X X X 03 3 * 10 MPH PACE: 24 - 33 24 - 33 24 - 33 M.P.H.33 X X X X X 05 5 *32 X X X X X X 42 6 P % IN PACE: 68% 79% 73%31 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 6 13 A30 X X X X X X X 34 7 C % OVER PACE: 32% 14% 23%29 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 7 14 E28 X X X X X X X X 35 8 * % UNDER PACE: 0% 7% 4%27 X X X 21 3 *26 X X X X X X X X X 54 9 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 32 29 30 M.P.H.25 X X X X X X X X X 36 924 X X X X X X 24 6 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 31 17 2623 00 022 X X X 03 3 STANDARD DEVIATION: 6 4 5 M.P.H.21 X 01 120 00 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.59 0.31 0.2419 00 018 00 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.77 0.56 0.49 M.P.H.17 00 016 00 015 00 0 53 56 109

FAIRRADAR

CITY OF BANNING
TO

WILLIAMS STREET

CARLOSPRTLY SUNNYDRY
444
DATE: 05/12/25 DAY: Monday TIME PERIOD: 12:32PM 12:53PM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): HIGHLAND SPRINGS AVE AND HIGHLAND HOME RD 65 00 064 00 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 5231 WILSON ST63 00 062 00 061 00 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 45 MPH OBSERVER:60 00 059 X 10 1 COMMENTS: WEATHER:58 00 057 X 10 1 ROAD SURFACE:56 00 055 X 01 1 ROAD CONDITION:54 X X 11 253 X X X X X 23 5 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:52 X 01 151 X X X X X 23 550 X X 11 249 X X X 12 348 X X X X X X X X X 36 947 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 5 9 1446 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 6 1445 X X X X X X X X 44 844 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 5 1443 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 8 17 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 10 1641 X X X X X X X X X X 4 6 1040 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 6 15 85TH %: 47 48 47 M.P.H. 39 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 7 1738 X X X X X X X X X X 6 4 10 50TH %: 42 42 42 M.P.H.37 X X X X X X X 43 736 X X X X X X X X X X X 5 6 11 15TH %: 37 37 37 M.P.H.35 X X X X X X 33 6 *34 X X X X 22 4 * 10 MPH PACE: 38 - 47 39 - 48 38 - 47 M.P.H.33 X X X X 31 4 *32 X 01 1 P % IN PACE: 70% 67% 68%31 00 0 A30 X 01 1 C % OVER PACE: 12% 12% 15%29 X 10 1 E28 00 0 * % UNDER PACE: 18% 21% 18%27 00 0 *26 00 0 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 42 43 42 M.P.H.25 00 024 00 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 28 28 2823 00 022 00 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5 5 5 M.P.H.21 00 020 00 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.28 0.28 0.1419 00 018 00 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.53 0.53 0.38 M.P.H.17 00 016 00 015 00 0 100 100 200

FAIRRADAR

CITY OF BANNING
TO

WILSON STREET

CARLOSPARTLY SUNNDRY
445
DATE: 05/12/25 DAY: Monday TIME PERIOD: 12:56PM 1:20PM
FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): HIGHLAND HOME RD AND SUNSET AVE 65 00 064 00 0 OBSERVATION POINT: EAST OF DYSART DR63 00 062 00 061 00 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 45 MPH OBSERVER:60 00 059 00 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:58 X 10 157 X 01 1 ROAD SURFACE:56 00 055 X X 11 2 ROAD CONDITION:54 X 01 153 X 10 1 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:52 X X X 12 351 X X X X 04 450 X X X X X X 24 649 X X X X X X X X X X X 6 5 1148 X X X X X X X X X X X 7 4 1147 X X X X X X X X 35 846 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 5 9 1445 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 8 1544 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 6 1343 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 7 21 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND42 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 6 1441 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 7 1340 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 8 17 85TH %: 48 49 48 M.P.H.39 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 4 1338 X X X X X X X X X X X X 5 7 12 50TH %: 43 43 43 M.P.H.37 X X X X X X X 43 736 X X 02 2 15TH %: 39 38 38 M.P.H.35 X X X X X X 24 6 *34 X X 11 2 * 10 MPH PACE: 39 - 48 38 - 47 38 - 47 M.P.H.33 X X 11 2 *32 00 0 P % IN PACE: 75% 67% 70%31 00 0 A30 00 0 C % OVER PACE: 12% 22% 21%29 00 0 E28 00 0 * % UNDER PACE: 13% 11% 10%27 00 0 *26 00 0 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 43 44 43 M.P.H.25 00 024 00 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 20 25 2323 00 022 00 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 4 5 5 M.P.H.21 00 020 00 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.20 0.25 0.1119 00 018 00 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.45 0.50 0.34 M.P.H.17 00 016 00 015 00 0 100 100 200

FAIRRADAR

CITY OF BANNING
TO

WILSON STREET

CARLOSPARTLY SUNNDRY
446
DATE: 05/12/25 DAY: Monday TIME PERIOD: 1:24PM 1:55PM
FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SUNSET AVE AND SUNRISE AVE 65 00 064 00 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 3086 WILSON ST63 00 062 00 061 00 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 50 MPH OBSERVER:60 00 059 00 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:58 X 10 157 X X 02 2 ROAD SURFACE:56 00 055 X X X 12 3 ROAD CONDITION:54 00 053 00 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:52 X 10 151 00 050 X X X X X X X X 44 849 X X X X X X X X X X 3 7 1048 X X X X X X X X X X X 7 4 1147 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 4 10 1446 X X X X X X 24 645 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 8 1444 X X X X X X X X X 18 943 X X X X X X X X 26 8 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 X X X X X X X X X X X X 5 7 1241 X X X X X X X X X X X 7 4 1140 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 7 13 85TH %: 48 48 48 M.P.H. 39 X X X X X X X X 71 838 X X X X X X X X X X X 8 3 11 50TH %: 39 43 41 M.P.H.37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 7 1436 X X X X X X X X X X 8 2 10 15TH %: 35 36 35 M.P.H.35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 6 15 *34 X X X X X 41 5 * 10 MPH PACE: 33 - 42 40 - 49 35 - 44 M.P.H.33 X X X X X 32 5 *32 X X X X 22 4 P % IN PACE: 64% 65% 56%31 X 01 1 A30 X X X 12 3 C % OVER PACE: 32% 8% 35%29 00 0 E28 00 0 * % UNDER PACE: 4% 27% 10%27 X 10 1 *26 00 0 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 41 43 42 M.P.H.25 00 024 00 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 34 34 3523 00 022 00 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 6 6 6 M.P.H.21 00 020 00 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.34 0.34 0.1719 00 018 00 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.58 0.58 0.42 M.P.H.17 00 016 00 015 00 0 100 100 200

FAIRRADAR

CITY OF BANNING
TO

WILSON STREET

CARLOSPARTLY SUNNDRY
447
DATE: 05/12/25 DAY: Monday TIME PERIOD: 1:58PM 2:34PM
FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SUNRISE AVE AND 8TH ST 65 00 064 00 0 OBSERVATION POINT: EAST OF SIMS DR63 00 062 00 061 X 01 1 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 50 MPH OBSERVER:60 00 059 X 01 1 COMMENTS: WEATHER:58 00 057 X 10 1 ROAD SURFACE:56 00 055 00 0 ROAD CONDITION:54 X 01 153 X X 11 2 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:52 X 10 151 X X 20 250 X X X X X X X X 62 849 X X X X X X X X X 72 948 X X X X X X X 34 747 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 7 1546 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 7 1645 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 8 1844 X X X X X X X X X X X 6 5 1143 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 5 10 15 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 6 1541 X X X X X X X X X X X 6 5 1140 X X X X X X X X 35 8 85TH %: 49 47 48 M.P.H. 39 X X X X X X X X X X X X 5 7 1238 X X X X X X X 34 7 50TH %: 44 42 43 M.P.H.37 X X X X X X X X 26 836 X X X X X X X X X X X 4 7 11 15TH %: 37 36 36 M.P.H.35 X X X X 13 4 *34 X X X X 13 4 * 10 MPH PACE: 41 - 50 39 - 48 39 - 48 M.P.H.33 X X X X 22 4 *32 X X X X 22 4 P % IN PACE: 69% 64% 64%31 X X 11 2 A30 00 0 C % OVER PACE: 5% 8% 13%29 X X 20 2 E28 00 0 * % UNDER PACE: 26% 28% 23%27 00 0 *26 00 0 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 43 42 43 M.P.H.25 00 024 00 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 30 31 3123 00 022 00 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5 6 6 M.P.H.21 00 020 00 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.30 0.31 0.1519 00 018 00 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.55 0.56 0.39 M.P.H.17 00 016 00 015 00 0 100 100 200

FAIRRADAR

CITY OF BANNING
TO

WILSON STREET

CARLOSPARTLY SUNNDRY
40 448
DATE: 05/12/25 DAY: Monday TIME PERIOD: 2:36PM 3:37PM
FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): 8TH ST AND BLANCHARD ST 65 00 064 00 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 660 WILSON ST63 00 062 00 061 00 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 40 MPH OBSERVER:60 00 059 00 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:58 00 057 00 0 ROAD SURFACE:56 00 055 00 0 ROAD CONDITION:54 00 053 00 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:52 00 051 00 050 00 049 00 048 00 047 00 046 00 045 X 01 144 X 10 143 X 10 1 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 X X X X X X X X X X 6 4 1041 X X X X X X 42 640 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 5 14 85TH %: 40 39 40 M.P.H. 39 X X X X X X X X X X X X 5 7 1238 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 6 16 50TH %: 36 35 35 M.P.H.37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 9 1736 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 8 20 15TH %: 31 30 30 M.P.H.35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 10 18 *34 X X X X X X X X X X X 5 6 11 * 10 MPH PACE: 31 - 40 29 - 38 31 - 40 M.P.H.33 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 8 17 *32 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 3 11 14 P % IN PACE: 77% 76% 76%31 X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 4 12 A30 X X X X X X X X X 45 9 C % OVER PACE: 12% 19% 10%29 X X X X X X X X X X X 2 9 11 E28 X X X X X X X 43 7 * % UNDER PACE: 11% 5% 15%27 X X 11 2 *26 X 01 1 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 36 35 35 M.P.H.25 00 024 00 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 16 16 1723 00 022 00 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 4 4 4 M.P.H.21 00 020 00 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.16 0.16 0.0819 00 018 00 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.40 0.41 0.29 M.P.H.17 00 016 00 015 00 0 100 100 200

FAIRRADAR

CITY OF BANNING
TO

WILSON STREET

CARLOSPARTLY SUNNDRY
449
2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

CITY OF BANNING

APPENDIX C
ADT Count Sheets
450