Agenda packet — Beaumont City Council, February 15, 2022 (part 1 of 2)

CITY COUNCIL CLOSED & REGULAR SESSION
550 E. Sixth Street, Beaumont, CA
Tuesday, February 15, 2022
Closed Session: 5:00 PM | Regular Meeting: 6:00 PM
Materials related to an item on this agenda submitted to the City Council after distribution of the agenda packets are available for public inspection in the City Clerk’s office at 550 E. 6th Street during normal business hours.

AGENDA

MEETING PARTICIPATION NOTICE
This meeting will be conducted utilizing teleconference communications and will be recorded for live streaming as well as open to public attendance subject to social distancing and applicable health orders. All City of Beaumont public meetings will be available via live streaming and made available on the City's official YouTube webpage. Please use the following link during the meeting for live stream access.
beaumontca.gov/livestream
Public comments will be accepted using the following options.

1. Written comments will be accepted via email and will be read aloud during the corresponding item of the meeting. Public comments shall not exceed three (3) minutes unless otherwise authorized by City Council. Comments can be submitted anytime prior to the meeting as well as during the meeting up until the end of the corresponding item. Please submit your comments to: [email protected]

2. Phone-in comments will be accepted by joining a conference line prior to the corresponding item of the meeting. Public comments shall not exceed three (3) minutes unless otherwise authorized by City Council. Please use the following phone number to join the call (951) 922 - 4845.

3. In person comments subject to the adherence of the applicable health orders and social distancing requirements.

In compliance with the American Disabilities Act, if you require special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk's office using the above email or call (951) 572 - 3196.

Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will ensure the best reasonable accommodation arrangements.
1 CLOSED SESSION - 5:00 PM
A Closed Session of the City Council / Beaumont Financing Authority / Beaumont Utility Authority / Beaumont Successor Agency (formerly RDA)/Beaumont Parking Authority / Beaumont Public Improvement Authority may be held in accordance with state law which may include, but is not limited to, the following types of items: personnel matters, labor negotiations, security matters, providing instructions to real property negotiators and conference with legal counsel regarding pending litigation. Any public comment on Closed Session items will be taken prior to the Closed Session. Any required announcements or discussion of Closed Session items or actions following the Closed Session with be made in the City Council Chambers.

CALL TO ORDER
Mayor White, Mayor Pro Tem Martinez, Council Member Fenn, Council Member Santos, Council Member Lara
Public Comments Regarding Closed Session

1. Conference with Legal Counsel Regarding Existing Litigation Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1): Ezekwesili Iloputaife, et. al. v. City of Beaumont et. al., Riv.

Co. Sup. Ct. Case No. 2105069

2. Conference with Labor Negotiators - Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6 City Designated Representatives City Manager Todd Parton and Administrative Services Director Kari Mendoza. Employee Organizations: Police Management and SEIU

3. Annual Public Employee Performance Evaluation pursuant to Government Code Section 54957. Title: City Manager
Adjourn to Regular Session
REGULAR SESSION - 6:00 PM

CALL TO ORDER
Mayor White, Mayor Pro Tem Martinez, Council Member Fenn, Council Member Santos, Council Member Lara
Report out from Closed Session
Action on any Closed Session Items
Action of any Requests for Excused Absence
Pledge of Allegiance
Invocation
Adjustments to the Agenda
Conflict of Interest Disclosure

ANNOUNCEMENTS/ RECOGNITION / PROCLAMATIONS / CORRESPONDENCE

1. Retirement Recognition of Building Official Pedro Rico

PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD (ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA)
Any one person may address the City Council on any matter not on this agenda. If you wish to speak, please fill out a “Public Comment Form” provided at the back table and give it to the City Clerk. There is a three (3) minute time limit on 2 public comments. There will be no sharing or passing of time to another person. State Law prohibits the City Council from discussing or taking actions brought up by your comments.

CONSENT CALENDAR
Items on the consent calendar are taken as one action item unless an item i s pulled for further discussion here or at the end of action items. Approval of all Ordinances and Resolutions to be read by title only.

2. Approval of Minutes
Recommended Action:

Approve Minutes dated February 1, 2022.

3. Ratification of Warrants
Recommended Action:

Ratify Warrants dated:

January 27, 2022, and
February 4, 2022.

4. Authorize Staff to Issue a Bond Exoneration Letter for Performance and Payment Bond No. 30120819 for Street Improvements and Accept Maintenance Bond No. 30120819 -M Recommended Action:

Authorize City staff to issue a Bond Exoneration Letter for Performance and Payment Bonds No. 30120819 for Street Improvements and Accept Maintenance Bond No. 30120819-M.

PUBLIC HEARINGS
Approval of all Ordinances and Resolutions to be read by title only.

5. Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act (TEFRA) Hearing for Noble Creek Apartments Recommended Action:

Conduct a Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act Hearing in consideration of the issuance of tax-exempt bond financing by the California Statewide Communities Development Authority for the benefit of HPD Noble Creek II LP, to provide financing for the acquisition, rehabilitation, improvement, and equipping of a 108-unit multifamily rental housing project generally known as Noble Creek Apartments; and

Waive the full reading and adopt by title only, A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Beaumont Approving the Issuance by the California Statewide Communities Development Authority of Multi-Family Housing Revenue Bonds for the Noble Creek Apartments.”

6. Public Hearing and First Reading to Approve an Addition to Municipal Code Section

1.16 “General Penalty” Adding Penalties for the Possession and Use of I llegal Fireworks Recommended Action:

Hold a public hearing, and
3 Waive the full first reading and approve by title only, “An Ordinance of the City of Beaumont Amending the Beaumont Municipal Code Chapter 1.16 Entitled ‘General Penalty’ and Making Findings Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act.”

ACTION ITEMS
Approval of all Ordinances and Resolutions to be read by title only.

7. Approve the Sponsorship of the 2022 Beaumont Cherry Festival and Allocate $100,000 from Recreation Programs Account No. 100-1550-7040-0000 Recommended Action:

Approve the sponsorship of the 2022 Beaumont Cherry Festival and allocate $100,000 from the Recreation Programs Account No. 100-1550-7040-0000.

8. Consider Non-Binding Memorandum of Understanding Between the City of Beaumont and the Beaumont-Cherry Valley Recreation & Park Corporation (Corporation) to Collaborate on Development of a Regional Park at the Danny Thomas Ranch Recommended Action:

It is recommended that the City Council approve the non-binding memorandum of understanding between the City of Beaumont and the Beaumont – Cherry Valley Recreation & Park Corporation to collaborate on development of a regional park at the Danny Thomas Ranch.

9. Subscription Renewal Amendment for Dossier Systems Vehicle Repair Order Program Recommended Action:

Approve the renewal and additional enhancements of Dossier in an amount not to exceed $34,787.06,
Authorize the City Manager to execute the Dossier On-Demand Order Form, and Authorize City staff to execute a purchase order in an amount not to exceed $34,787.06.

10. Consider Resolution Adopting a Policy Statement to Encourage but Not Mandate or Require Contractors to “Hire Locally” and Use a “Skilled and Trained Workforce” within the Meaning of Public Contract Code Section 2601(d) for Any Construction Activities Related to an “Apprenticeable Occupation” Pursuant to Public Contract Code Section 2601(a) for Projects 30,000 Square Feet or Larger
Recommended Action:

The following options are provided for City Council’s consideration:

1. Waive the full reading and adopt the resolution by title only, “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Beaumont, California, Adopting a Policy Statement to Encourage but Not Mandate or Require Contractors to “Hire Locally” and Use a “Skilled and Trained Workforce” within the Meaning of Public Contract Code Section 2601(d) for Any Construction Activities Related to an “Apprenticeable Occupation” Pursuant to Public Contract Code Section 2601(a) for Projects 30,000 Square Feet or Larger,”
4 or

2. Do not approve resolution and provide staff with further direction.

11. Award a Professional Services Agreement to Albert A. Webb Associates to Provide Engineering and Design Services for the Beaumont Mesa Lift Station and Force Main Project in an Amount Not to Exceed $536,785
Recommended Action:

Award a Professional Services Agreement to Albert A. Webb Associates to provide engineering and design services for the Beaumont Mesa Lift Station and Force Main Project in an amount not to exceed $536,785.

12. Approval of the First Amendment to the Professional Services Agreement with Chambers Group, Inc., for Environmental Documentation Services for the West Side Fire Station Project in the Amount of $34,613, with the Total Contract Amount Not to Exceed $59,506
Recommended Action:

Approve the First Amendment to the Professional Services Agreement with Chambers Group, Inc., for environmental documentation services for the West Side Fire Station Project in the amount of $34,613, with the total contract amount not to exceed $59,506.

13. Authorize the Purchase of Trimble S7 Survey Equipment with California Surveying and Drafting Supply in an Amount Not to Exceed $44,031.88
Recommended Action:

Approve and authorize the issuance of a purchase order to California Surveying Drafting Supply for Trimble S7 Survey Equipment in the amount of $44,031.88.

14. Procedure for Addressing Public Requests for Traffic Related Safety Concerns Recommended Action:

Approve the procedure for addressing public requests for traffic related safety concerns.

15. Food Trucks and Motorized, Mobile Food Vendor Standards Recommended Action:

Hold discussion and provide direction to staff on preparing an ordinance for the regulation of food trucks.

16. Review and Approve the City of Beaumont 2022 Legislative Platform Recommended Action:

Hold discussion and approve the 2022 Legislative Platform.

17. Request City Council to Approve the Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Beaumont and Police Managers as Individuals
Recommended Action:
5 Approve the Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Beaumont and Police Managers as Individuals and authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement.

18. Approval of Compensation Plan and Salary Table
Recommended Action:

Approval of the Compensation Plan and Salary Table.

19. Approval of City Attorney Invoices for the Month of January 2022 Recommended Action:

Approve invoices in the amount of $149,284.06.

LEGISLATIVE UPDATES AND DISCUSSION

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT UPDATE
Economic Development Committee Report Out and City Council Direction

CITY TREASURER REPORT
Finance and Audit Committee Report Out and City Council Direction

CITY CLERK REPORT

CITY ATTORNEY REPORT

20. Current Pending Litigation

CITY MANAGER REPORT

21. Department Project Schedule Updates - January 2022

FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS

COUNCIL REPORTS
- Lara
- Santos
- Fenn
- Martinez
- White

ADJOURNMENT
The next regular meeting of the Beaumont City Council, Beaumont Financing Authority, the Beaumont Successor Agency (formerly RDA), the Beaumont Utility Authority, the Beaumont Parking Authority and 6 the Beaumont Public Improvement Agency is scheduled for Tu esday, March 1 2022, at 5:00 p.m., unless otherwise posted.
7 CITY COUNCIL CLOSED & REGULAR SESSION
550 E. Sixth Street, Beaumont, CA
Tuesday, February 01, 2022
Closed Session: 5:00 PM | Regular Meeting: 6:00 PM
Materials related to an item on this agenda submitted to the City Council after distribution of the agenda packets are available for public inspection in the City Clerk’s office at 550 E. 6th Street during normal business hours

MINUTES
CLOSED SESSION - 5:00 PM
A Closed Session of the City Council / Beaumont Financing Authority / Beaumont Utility Authority / Beaumont Successor Agency (formerly RDA)/Beaumont Parking Authority / Beaumont Public Improvement Authority may be held in accordance with state law which may include, but is not limited to, the following types of items: personnel matters, labor negotiations, security matters, providing instructions to real property negotiators and conference with legal counsel regarding pending litigation. Any public comment on Closed Session items will be taken prior to the Closed Session. Any required announcements or discussion of Closed Session items or actions following the Closed Session with be made in the City Council Chambers.

CALL TO ORDER at 5:00 p.m.

Present: Mayor White, Mayor Pro Tem Martinez, Council Member Fenn, Council Member Santos, Council Member Lara
Public Comments Regarding Closed Session
None

1. Conference with Legal Counsel Regarding Existing Litigation Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1): Steven Fortier v. City of Beaumont, Riv. Sup. Ct Case No: CVRI 2105608
Motion by Mayor Pro Tem Martinez
Second by Council Member Lara
To defend the case.

Approved by a unanimous vote.

8 Item 2.

3. Annual Public Employee Performance Evaluation pursuant to Government Code Section 54957. Title: City Manager
No reportable action.

4. Conference with Labor Negotiators Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6 Agency Designated Representatives: Councilmember Mike Lara and Mayor Pro Tem Julio Martinez. Unrepresented Employee: City Manager
No reportable action.

REGULAR SESSION - 6:00 PM

CALL TO ORDER at 6:35 p.m.

Present: Mayor White, Mayor Pro Tem Martinez, Council Member Fenn, Council Member Santos, Council Member Lara
Report out from Closed Session
Action on any Closed Session Items: see above.

Action of any Requests for Excused Absence: None
Pledge of Allegiance
Adjustments to the Agenda: None
Conflict of Interest Disclosure: None

PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD (ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA)
Any one person may address the City Council on any matter not on this agenda. If you wish to speak, please fill out a “Public Comment Form” provided at the back table and give it to the City Clerk. There is a three (3) minute time limit on public comments. There will be no sharing or passing of time to another person. State Law prohibits the City Council from discussing or taking actions brought up by your comments.

No comments.

CONSENT CALENDAR
Items on the consent calendar are taken as one action item unless an item is pulled for further discussion here or at the end of action items. Approval of all Ordinances and Resolutions to be read by title only.

1. Approval of Minutes
Recommended Action:

Approve Minutes dated January 18, 2022
9 Item 2.

2. Ratification of Warrants
Recommended Action:

Ratify Warrants dated:

January 7, 2022,
January 13, 2022, and
January 20, 2022.

3. Re-Ratification of Local Emergency and Re-Authorizing the Use of Teleconferencing to Conduct Public Meetings
Recommended Action:

Waive the full reading and adopt by title only, “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Beaumont Proclaiming a Local Emergency Persists, Re-Ratifying the Proclamation of a State of Emergency by Executive Order N-09-21, and Re-Authorizing Remote Teleconference Meetings of the Legislative Bodies of the City of Beaumont for the Period of February 1, 2022, through March 1, 2022, Pursuant to Provisions of the Ralph M. Brown Act.”

4. Resolution Approving the City of Beaumont Wastewater Master Plan Recommended Action:

Waive the full reading and adopt by title only, “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Beaumont Adoption of the Wastewater Master Plan.”

Motion by Council Member Lara
Second by Mayor White
To approve the Consent Calendar
Approved by a unanimous vote.

ACTION ITEMS
Approval of all Ordinances and Resolutions to be read by title only.

5. Contract Amendment with Webb Municipal Finance, LLC for Annual Community Facilities District (CFD) Administration Services, Special Tax Consultant Services and Annual CFD Financial Reporting Services
Motion by Mayor Pro Tem Martinez
Second Council Member Lara
To approve the Second Amendment to the contract with Webb Municipal Finance, LLC.

Approved by a unanimous vote.

10 Item 2.

6. Appointment to the Beaumont Planning Commission
Nomination of: Michael Cannon, Eric Ustation, Sedrick Bedolla, and David Castaldo.

Dr. Sedrick Bedolla received majority vote to be appointed to the Planning Commission Meeting.

Approved by a 3-2 vote.

7. Presentation/Update of the Police Station Feasibility Study and Direction from City Council Motion by Council Member Lara
Second by Fenn
To approve of the Draft Space Needs Assessment.

Approved by a unanimous vote.

8. Approve the Purchase and Installation of Mobile View Camera System on 18 Public Transportation Buses, Not to Exceed $110,000
Motion by Council Member Lara
Second by Council Member Santos
To approve the purchase of a Mobile View camera system in an amount not to exceed $110,000 as part of capital improvement project CIP T-08 and authorize City staff to issue a purchase order for the procurement and installation of camera systems on 18 Beaumont Transit buses.

Approved by a unanimous vote.

9. Transit Capital Improvement Project Update
City Attorney John Pinkney recused himself on this item due to a potential conflict of interest.

Motion by Mayor White
Second by Council Member Fenn
To receive and file the Transit Capital Improvement update.

Approved by a unanimous vote.

10. Update of the Department of Building and Safety
Motion by Mayor White
Second by City Council Lara
To receive and file.

Approved by a unanimous vote.
11 Item 2.

11. City Hall Renovation Update
Motion by Mayor White
Second by Council Member Lara
To receive and file the Capital Improvement City Hall Update.

Approved by a unanimous vote.

12. Collections System CIP Project Update
Motion by Mayor White
Second by Council Member Lara
To receive and file the Collection System CIP Project Update.

Approved by a unanimous vote.

13. First Amendment of an Agreement to Extend the Contract for Professional Services with Burrtec Waste Industries, Inc., to Provide Sludge Hauling Services for the Wastewater Treatment Plant
City Attorney recused himself due to a conflict of interest.

Motion by Council Member Lara
Second by Council Member Santos
To approve the first amendment of an agreement to extend the existing contract for professional services with Burrtec Waste Industries, Inc., to provide sludge hauling services for the WWTP through April 30, 2023.

Approved by a unanimous vote.

14. Authorize Preliminary Discussions with the Beaumont – Cherry Valley Recreation & Park Improvement Corporation (Corporation) on a Collaborative Effort to Develop a Park Facility on 123 Acres on the North Side of Cherry Valley Boulevard and Formerly Known as the Danny Thomas Ranch
Public Comment
S. Mehlman - Raised concerns regarding another warehouse potential across from the proposed park
D. Burke - Representing the Park District looks forward to working with the City.

Consensus to agree to begin preliminary discussions with the Beaumont – Cherry Valley Recreation and Park Improvement Corporation (Corporation) to explore how a future park facility at the Danny Thomas Ranch (DTR) site might mutually benefit both agencies,
Appoint Mayor White and Council Member Santos to a 2 by 2 committee to meet with representatives of the Corporation, and
Provide a report to the City Council when the City/District discussions have yielded tangible results.
12 Item 2.

15. Authorize Fifth Amendment to the City Manager Employment Agreement City Manager Todd Parton recused himself due to the item involving his contract.

Motion by Council Member Lara
Second by Council Member Martinez
To authorize the Mayor to execute the Fifth Amendment to the City Manager Employment Agreement.

Approved by a unanimous vote.

LEGISLATIVE UPDATES AND DISCUSSION

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT UPDATE
Economic Development Committee will meet next week.

CITY TREASURER REPORT
Finance and Audit Committee will meet in 2 weeks.

CITY CLERK REPORT
No report.

CITY ATTORNEY REPORT
No report.

CITY MANAGER REPORT
Thanked the Council for their support.

16. December 2021 Department Project Updates

FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
- Discussion of Planning Commission structure.
- Youth Council establishment.

COUNCIL REPORTS
- Lara - No report
- Santos - No report
- Fenn – Shared a positive experience using the app
- Martinez - Needing someone to represent the City at career day and Three Rings. - White – Asked that Council photos be updated.

ADJOURNMENT at 9:59 p.m.
13 Item 2.

The next regular meeting of the Beaumont City Council, Beaumont Financing Authority, the Beaumont Successor Agency (formerly RDA), the Beaumont Utility Authority, the Beaumont Parking Authority and the Beaumont Public Improvement Agency is scheduled for Tuesday, February 15 2022, at 5:00 p.m., unless otherwise posted.

14 Item 2.

15 Item 3.

16 Item 3.

17 Item 3.

18 Item 3.

19 Item 3.

20 Item 3.

21 Item 3.

22 Item 3.

23 Item 3.

24 Item 3.

25 Item 3.

26 Item 3.

27 Item 3.

28 Item 3.

29 Item 3.

30 Item 3.

31 Item 3.

32 Item 3.

33 Item 3.

34 Item 3.

35 Item 3.

36 Item 3.

37 Item 3.

38 Item 3.

39 Item 3.

40 Item 3.

41 Item 3.

Staff Report

TO: City Council
FROM: Robert L. Vestal, Assistant Public Works Director DATE February 15, 2022
SUBJECT: Authorize Staff to Issue a Bond Exoneration Letter for Performance and Payment Bond No. 30120819 for Street Improvements and Accept Maintenance Bond No. 30120819-M

Background and Analysis:

The City requires all developers to provide construction security for public improvements consisting of, but not limited to, street improvements, sewer improvements, storm drain improvements, and survey monumentation. After the improvements are constructed, City staff verifies that no liens have been filed , that the improvements are completed in accordance with the project’s conditions of approval, design standards, and City requirements, and that all punch list items have been addressed. Once verified, City Council may exonerate the construction security and accept a one-year maintenance security.

During the one-year maintenance period, the developer maintains all associated improvements. After the one-year term has elapsed, the developer may petition City Council to accept the improvements into the publicly maintained system and exonerate the maintenance security.

Tri Pointe Homes IE-SD, Inc.

The principal, Tri Pointe Homes IE-SD, Inc., is requesting that the performance and payment bond No. 30120819 be exonerated. Improvements associated with said bonds were constructed under Public Works Project No. PW2018-0320, shown on City file No. 3270, and generally located as shown in Figure 1 – Vicinity Map. 42 Item 4.

Figure 1 - Vicinity Map

City staff has verified no liens have been filed, that the improvements were constructed in accordance with the project’s conditions of approval, design standards, and City requirements, and that all punch list items had been addressed. Additionally, City staff has received and reviewed the following documents:

1. Bond Exoneration Application No. PW2021-0737, and

2. Maintenance Bond 30120819-M, provided by Tri Pointe Homes IE-SD, Inc.

The following table is a summary of the bonds.

Table 1 –Bond Summary
# Improvement PW# Performance
Bond Number
Maintenance
Bond Number
1 Street PW2018-0320 30120819 30120819-M

Therefore, City staff recommends that City Council accept the maintenance bond and authorize City staff to issue a bond exoneration letter for the performance and payment bonds.

Fiscal Impact:

The cost of preparing the staff report is estimated to be $350. 43 Item 4.

Recommended Action:

Authorize City staff to issue a Bond Exoneration Letter for Performance and Payment Bonds No. 30120819 for Street Improvements and Accept Maintenance Bond No. 30120819-M.

Attachments:

A. Bond Exoneration Application PW2021-0737, maintenance bond, and punch list. 44 Item 4.

45 Item 4.

46 Item 4.

47 Item 4.

48 Item 4.

49 Item 4.

50 Item 4.

51 Item 4.

52 Item 4.

53 Item 4.

54 Item 4.

1250 Corona Pointe Court / Suite 600 / Corona / CA / 92879 / Ph (951) 428-4400 / Fax (951) 428-4410

LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL

TO: City of Beaumont DATE: 08/28/2021
550 E. 6th Street
Beaumont, CA 92223

ATTN: Sue Foxworth PROJECT: Sundance
TEL: (951) 769-8520 PW2021-0737
FAX: Bond 30120819

WE ARE FORWARDING:

X DropBox Will Call UPS
Overnight Pick up U.S. Mail

DESCRIPTION
Submittals:

1. Bond Exoneration Application - 30120819 Signed

2. SUND Cherry Ave Street Imp Bond 30120819

3. PW2018-0320 Approved Cherry Ave Widening Street Plans 2021.02.17

THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:

For Approval Approved as Submitted For Your Use For Your Action

X At Your Request As Requested,

COMMENTS:

SIGNED: Rick Rush
Rick Rush
Project Manager

55 Item 4.

56Item 4.

57Item 4.

58Item 4.

59Item 4.

60Item 4.

61Item 4.

62Item 4.

63Item 4.

64Item 4.

65Item 4.

66Item 4.

67Item 4.

68Item 4.

69Item 4.

70Item 4.

71Item 4.

72Item 4.

73Item 4.

74Item 4.

Street Improvement Plans

CITY OF BEAUMONT, CALIFORNIA

CHERRY AVENUE STREET WIDENING
Located Within a Portion of Section 35, Township 2 South, Range 1 West, S.B.M.

DECLARATION OF RESPONSIBLE CHARGE

ABBREVIATIONS

SHEET INDEX

CONTACT
OWNER

BASIS OF TOPOGRAPHY

SOILS ENGINEER
LEGEND
GENERAL NOTES:

REFERENCE PLANS

INDEX OF SHEETS
NPDES PERMIT#:
(MARY LANE TO BROOKSIDE AVENUE)VICINITY MAP
WORK TO BE DONE:

PRIVATE ENGINEER'S NOTICE TO
CONTRACTOR:
24-HOUR EMERGENCY
WDID 833C365311

STREET NOTES

CONSTRUCTION NOTES

DEMOLITION NOTES
BENCHMARK:

ELEV.= 2678.277 (1982), NGVD 29
BY

ENGINEER R E V I S I O N S
DATE
SEAL DESIGN BY:

DRAWN BY:

CHECKED BY:

SCALE:

DATE:

JOB NUMBER:CITY OF BEAUMONT, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT

ENGINEERING DIVISION
Reviewed By:

Recommended
for Approval By:

Approved By:

FILE NO:

S H E E T

OF SHEETS
550E. 6th St
Beaumont, CA 92223
TEL: (951) 769-8520 FAX: (951) 769-8526
Date:

Date:

NOTE:

AS NOTED
NOVEMBER 2020
169884
CG
CG
MMI
MBAKERINTL.COM
75410 Gerald Ford Dr. Ste:100
Palm Desert, CA 92211
Phone: (760) 346-7481
BEARING: N 52°49'02.84" E
BASIS OF BEARINGS:

MARK DESCRIPTION APPR. DATE
CITY

STREET IMPROVEMENT PLAN

CI V I LS
T

ATE OF CA L IF O RNIAREGISTERED P R O F E SSIONAL
E
NGI
NEERMAURICIO M . IACU
E
L
LI
No. C63249
Staff Engineer
MAURICIO M. IACUELLI
R.C.E. 63249 * EXP. 6/30/22 PW2018-0320COUNTY OVERSIGHT ENGINEERREGISTRATION NUMBERDATE SIGNEDRECMDREVISED: 02/04/2021BENJIE CHO2/5/2021 2/5/2021
CEG 1257 2/8/21
2/10/2021
2/10/2021
02/17/2021
3270
75 Item 4.

DEMOLITION NOTESREMOVAL LEGEND

EROSION CONTROL LEGEND

CONSTRUCTION NOTES
CHERRY AVENUE (43+75.55 TO 48+62.46)

TYPICAL STREET SECTION
CHERRY AVENUE (48+62.46 TO 62+00.00)

TYPICAL STREET SECTION

GRIND AND OVERLAY DETAIL

BROOKSIDE AVENUE

EXISTING STREET SECTION (LOOKING EAST)

EROSION CONTROL NOTES
BENCHMARK:

ELEV.= 2678.277 (1982), NGVD 29
BY

ENGINEER R E V I S I O N S
DATE
SEAL DESIGN BY:

DRAWN BY:

CHECKED BY:

SCALE:

DATE:

JOB NUMBER:CITY OF BEAUMONT, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT

ENGINEERING DIVISION
Reviewed By:

Recommended
for Approval By:

Approved By:

FILE NO:

S H E E T

OF SHEETS
550E. 6th St
Beaumont, CA 92223
TEL: (951) 769-8520 FAX: (951) 769-8526
Date:

Date:

NOTE:

AS NOTED
NOVEMBER 2020
169884
CG
CG
MMI
MBAKERINTL.COM
75410 Gerald Ford Dr. Ste:100
Palm Desert, CA 92211
Phone: (760) 346-7481
BEARING: N 52°49'02.84" E
BASIS OF BEARINGS:

MARK DESCRIPTION APPR. DATE
CITY

STREET IMPROVEMENT PLAN

CI V I LS
T

ATE OF CA L IF O RNIAREGISTERED P R O F E SSIONAL
E
NGI
NEERMAURICIO M . IACU
E
L
LI
No. C63249
Staff Engineer
MAURICIO M. IACUELLI
R.C.E. 63249 * EXP. 6/30/22 PW2018-0320COUNTY OVERSIGHT ENGINEERREVISED: 02/04/2021FH Vss FHss s
ssss
ssFHs
s2/5/2021
2/10/2021
2/10/2021
02/17/2021
3270
76 Item 4.

BENCHMARK:

ELEV.= 2678.277 (1982), NGVD 29
BY

ENGINEER R E V I S I O N S
DATE
SEAL DESIGN BY:

DRAWN BY:

CHECKED BY:

SCALE:

DATE:

JOB NUMBER:CITY OF BEAUMONT, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT

ENGINEERING DIVISION
Reviewed By:

Recommended
for Approval By:

Approved By:

FILE NO:

S H E E T

OF SHEETS
550E. 6th St
Beaumont, CA 92223
TEL: (951) 769-8520 FAX: (951) 769-8526
Date:

Date:

NOTE:

AS NOTED
NOVEMBER 2020
169884
CG
CG
MMI
MBAKERINTL.COM
75410 Gerald Ford Dr. Ste:100
Palm Desert, CA 92211
Phone: (760) 346-7481
BEARING: N 52°49'02.84" E
BASIS OF BEARINGS:

MARK DESCRIPTION APPR. DATE
CITY

STREET IMPROVEMENT PLAN

CI V I LS
T

ATE OF CA L IF O RNIAREGISTERED P R O F E SSIONAL
E
NGI
NEERMAURICIO M . IACU
E
L
LI
No. C63249
Staff Engineer
MAURICIO M. IACUELLI
R.C.E. 63249 * EXP. 6/30/22 PW2018-0320COUNTY OVERSIGHT ENGINEERREVISED: 11/09/202048+0047+0046+0045+0044+0043+00 54+0053+0052+0051+0050+0049+00

CONSTRUCTION NOTES
LINE DATA TABLE FH Vss FHss
◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊274527402735273027402735
27402740 274527302731.12738.82730.82732.12740.92730.52731.42744.42741.72741.12739.82739.42738.92738.52736.62733.12733.42744.82746.9BRUSHBRUSHVEGETATIONVEGETATIONVEGETATIONVEGETATIONVEGETATIONVEGETATIONREVISED: 02/04/202/5/2021 2/10/2021
2/10/2021
02/17/2021
3270
77 Item 4.

BENCHMARK:

ELEV.= 2678.277 (1982), NGVD 29
BY

ENGINEER R E V I S I O N S
DATE
SEAL DESIGN BY:

DRAWN BY:

CHECKED BY:

SCALE:

DATE:

JOB NUMBER:CITY OF BEAUMONT, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT

ENGINEERING DIVISION
Reviewed By:

Recommended
for Approval By:

Approved By:

FILE NO:

S H E E T

OF SHEETS
550E. 6th St
Beaumont, CA 92223
TEL: (951) 769-8520 FAX: (951) 769-8526
Date:

Date:

NOTE:

AS NOTED
NOVEMBER 2020
169884
CG
CG
MMI
MBAKERINTL.COM
75410 Gerald Ford Dr. Ste:100
Palm Desert, CA 92211
Phone: (760) 346-7481
BEARING: N 52°49'02.84" E
BASIS OF BEARINGS:

MARK DESCRIPTION APPR. DATE
CITY

STREET IMPROVEMENT PLAN

CI V I LS
T

ATE OF CA L IF O RNIAREGISTERED P R O F E SSIONAL
E
NGI
NEERMAURICIO M . IACU
E
L
LI
No. C63249
Staff Engineer
MAURICIO M. IACUELLI
R.C.E. 63249 * EXP. 6/30/22 PW2018-0320COUNTY OVERSIGHT ENGINEERREVISED: 11/09/202059+0058+0057+0056+0055+0054+00 63+0062+0061+0060+00

CONSTRUCTION NOTES

LINE DATA TABLE
s
ssss
ssFHs
s2
7 6
027552
7 5
0 2
7 5
0275527552750
27502759.72757.72757.62758.92758.42753.52755.62756.92753.42755.82753.52753.82751.52747.72746.92748.62746.62749.52750.62752.72755.32756.32757.1VEGETATIONBRUSHVEGETATIONBRUSHBRUSHVEGETATIONVEGETATIONVEGETATIONREVISED: 02/04/202/5/2021 2/10/2021
2/10/2021
02/17/2021
3270
78 Item 4.

FHFHFHFHFHFHFHFHBENCHMARK:

ELEV.= 2678.277 (1982), NGVD 29
BY

ENGINEER R E V I S I O N S
DATE
SEAL DESIGN BY:

DRAWN BY:

CHECKED BY:

SCALE:

DATE:

JOB NUMBER:CITY OF BEAUMONT, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT

ENGINEERING DIVISION
Reviewed By:

Recommended
for Approval By:

Approved By:

FILE NO:

S H E E T

OF SHEETS
550E. 6th St
Beaumont, CA 92223
TEL: (951) 769-8520 FAX: (951) 769-8526
Date:

Date:

NOTE:

AS NOTED
NOVEMBER 2020
169884
CG
CG
RZ
MBAKERINTL.COM
75410 Gerald Ford Dr. Ste:100
Palm Desert, CA 92211
Phone: (760) 346-7481
BEARING: N 52°49'02.84" E
BASIS OF BEARINGS:

MARK DESCRIPTION APPR. DATE
CITY
STREET IMPROVEMENT PLANStaff Engineer
RYAN K. ZELLERS
R.C.E. 69470 * EXP. 6/30/22 PW2018-0320REVISED: 11/09/2020COUNTY OVERSIGHT ENGINEERCONSTRUCTION NOTESSIGN LEGEND

STOP LIMIT

SPEED DO
NOT

PASSALL WAY
11/9/2020 REVISED: 02/04/202/10/2021
2/10/2021
02/17/2021
3270
79 Item 4.

Staff Report

TO: City Council
FROM: Christina Taylor, Community Development Director
DATE February 15, 2022
SUBJECT: Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act (TEFRA) Hearing for Noble Creek Apartments

Background and Analysis:

HPD Noble Creek II LP (“Borrower”) has requested that the California Statewide Communities Development Authority (“CSCDA”) serve as the municipal issuer of tax- exempt multi-family housing revenue bonds in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $12,000,000 (“Bonds”).

The proceeds of the Bonds will be used for the purpose of making a loan to the Borrower to finance the acquisition, rehabilitation, improvement and equipping of the Noble Creek Apartments, 719 Xenia Avenue and being generally located at the southwest corner of Xenia Avenue and Eighth Street (“Project”). This complex is a 108- unit affordable multifamily rental housing development. The project site will be owned and operated by the Borrower. A location map is provided below.

Project Location
80 Item 5.

On December 8, 2021, the project received an award of private activity bond allocation from the California Debt Limit Allocation Committee. The Bonds will be issued as limited obligations of CSCDA, and the City will have no liability with respect to the Bonds or any role to play in the bond issuance other than being required to hold a Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act (TEFRA) hearing. The Bonds to be issued by the CSCDA for the Project will be the sole responsibility of Borrower, and the C ity will have no financial, legal, moral obligation, liability or responsibility for the Project or the repayment of the Bonds for the financing of the Project. All financing documents with respect to the issuance of the loan will contain clear disclaimers that the Bonds are not obligations of the City and are to be paid for solely from funds provided by Borrower. The Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement provides that the CSCDA is a public entity, separate and apart from each member executing such agreement. The debts, liabilities and obligations of the CSCDA do not constitute debts, liabilities or obligations of the members executing such agreement.

As cited in the published notice of February 4, 2022, in the Press Enterprise, the public hearing is to be held so that all interested persons have the opportunity to speak or to submit written comments concerning the proposal to issue the Bonds and the nature or location of the Project to be financed; however, there is no formal obligation on the part of the Borrower or the City Council to respond to any specific comments made during the hearing or submitted in writing. The public hearing is also a requirement for all of a portion of the Bonds to qualify as tax exempt.

Adoption of the resolution is solely for the purposes of satisfying the requirements of the TEFRA, the Internal Revenue Code and the California Government Code Section 6500.

Prior to such TEFRA hearing, reasonable notice must be provided to the members of the community. Following the close of the TEFRA hearing, an “applicable elected representative” of the governmental unit hosting the Project must provide its approval of the issuance of the Bonds for the financing of the Project. A public notice was published on February 4, 2022 (Attachment A).

CSCDA is a joint powers authority sponsored by the League of California Cities ("League") and the California State Association of Counties ("CSAC"). CSCDA was created by the League and CSAC in 1988 to enable local government and eligible private entities access to low-cost, tax-exempt financing for projects that provide a tangible public benefit, contribute to social and economic growth and improve the overall quality of life in local communities throughout California. CSCDA is comprised of more than 530 members, including the City of Beaumont. CSCDA has issued more than $65 billion through 1,700 plus financings since 1988 and consistently ranks in the 81 Item 5.

top 10 of more than 3,000 nationwide public issuers of tax-exempt debt, as measured by annual issuance amount.

Fiscal Impact:

The cost for review of documents and preparation of this staff report is estimated to be $1,500.00. The applicant has agreed to pay the City for its services. Except for such fee, there is no fiscal impact to the City. The Bonds will be issued as limited obligations of CSCDA, payable solely from revenues and receipts derived from a loan to be made by CSCDA to the Borrower with the Bond proceeds. The City bears no liability with respect to the issuance of the Bonds. Further, the City is not a party to any of the financing documents related to the Bond issuance and is not named in any of the disclosure documents describing the Bonds or the proposed financing.

Recommended Action:

A. Public Notice
B. Resolution
82 Item 5.

LEGAL ADVERTISEMENT

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that, at 6:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as the matter can be heard, on Tuesday, February 15, 2022, at the City Council Chambers, 550 E. 6th Street, Beaumont, California, the City Council of the City of Beaumont (the "City") will conduct a public hearing as required by Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the "Code"), at which it will hear and consider information concerning a proposed plan of financing providing for the issuance by the California Statewide Communities Development Authority of exempt facility bonds for a qualified residential rental project pursuant to Section 142(a)(7) of the Code in one or more series issued from time to time, including bonds issued to refund such exempt facility bonds in one or more series from time to time, and at no time to exceed $12,000,000 in outstanding aggregate principal amount, to finance or refinance the acquisition, rehabilitation and development of a multifamily rental housing project located at 719 Xenia Avenue, Beaumont, California. The facilities are to be owned by HPD Noble Creek II LP (the "Borrower") or a partnership of which Highland Property Development LLC (the "Developer") or a related person to the Developer is the general partner (the "Project").

Public comments can be made in person with adherence to the current COVID-19 safety protocols, using the public comment phone line or by written email. Phone-in comments will be accepted by calling the designated public comment phone line (found on the agenda) prior to the corresponding item. Public comments shall not exceed three minutes unless otherwise authorized by City Council. Written comments can be emailed to [email protected] Public comments accepted via email will be read aloud during the corresponding item of the meeting. Comments can be submitted any time prior to the meeting as well as during the meeting until the end of the corresponding item.

This meeting will be conducted utilizing teleconference communications and will be recorded for live streaming. All City of Beaumont public meetings will be made available via live streaming and made available on the City’s official YouTube webpage. Please use the following link during the meeting for live stream access: BeaumontCa.gov/Livestream

Christina Taylor
Community Development Director

January 24, 2022
83 Item 5.

RESOLUTION 2022-__

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL

OF THE CITY OF BEAUMONT APPROVING

THE ISSUANCE BY THE CALIFORNIA

STATEWIDE COMMUNITIES DEVELOPMENT

AUTHORITY OF MULTIFAMILY HOUSING

REVENUE BONDS FOR THE NOBLE

CREEK APARTMENTS

WHEREAS, the California Statewide Communities Development Authority (the "Authority") is authorized pursuant to the provisions of California Government Code Section 6500 et seq. and the terms of an Amended and Restated Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement, dated as of June 1, 1988 (the "Agreement"), among certain local agencies throughout the State of California, including the City of Beaumont (the "City"), to issue revenue bonds in accordance with Chapter 7 of Part 5 of Division 31 of the California Health and Safety Code for the purpose of financing multifamily rental housing projects; and

WHEREAS, HPD Noble Creek II LP or a partnership of which Highland Property Development LLC (the "Developer") or a related person to the Developer is the general partner, has requested that the Authority adopt a plan of financing providing for the issuance of exempt facility bonds for a qualified residential rental project pursuant to Section 142(a)(7) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the "Code") in one or more series issued from time to time, including bonds issued to refund such exempt facility bonds in one or more series from time to time, and at no time to exceed $12,000,000 in outstanding aggregate principal amount (the "Bonds"), to finance or refinance the acquisition, rehabilitation and development of a multifamily rental housing project located at 719 Xenia Avenue, Beaumont, California (the "Project"); and

WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 147(f) of the Code, prior to their issuance, the Bonds are required to be approved by the "applicable elected representative" of the governmental units on whose behalf such bonds are expected to be issued and by a governmental unit having jurisdiction over the entire area in which any facility financed by such bonds is to be located, after a public hearing held following reasonable public notice; and

WHEREAS, the members of this City Council (this "City Council") are the applicable elected representatives of the City; and

WHEREAS, there has been published, at least 7 days prior to the date hereof, in a newspaper of general circulation within the City, a notice that a public hearing regarding the Bonds would be held on a date specified in such notice; and

WHEREAS, such public hearing was conducted on such date, at which time an opportunity was provided to interested parties to present arguments both for and against the issuance of the Bonds; and

84 Item 5.

WHEREAS, the Authority is also requesting that the City Council approve the issuance of any refunding bonds hereafter issued by the Authority for the purpose of refinancing the Bonds which financed the Project (the "Refunding Bonds"), but only in such cases where federal tax laws would not require additional consideration or approval by the City Council; and

WHEREAS, it is intended that this resolution shall constitute the approval of the issuance of the Bonds required by Section 147(f) of the Code and Section 9 of the Agreement;

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Beaumont as follows:

Section 1: The above recitals are true and correct.

Section 2: The City Council hereby approves the issuance of the Bonds and the Refunding Bonds by the Authority. It is the purpose and intent of the City Council that this resolution constitute approval of the Bonds for the purposes of (a) Section 147(f) of the Code and (b) Section 9 of the Agreement; provided, however, that this Resolution shall not constitute an approval by the Council of the Project for any other purposes, including compliance thereof with CEQA, nor does it constitute an approval of the underlying credit or financial structure of the Bonds.

Section 3: The officers of the City are hereby authorized and directed, jointly and severally, to do any and all things and to execute and deliver any and all documents that they deem necessary or advisable in order to carry out, give effect to and comply with the terms and intent of this resolution and the financing approved hereby.

Section 4: The adoption of this Resolution shall not obligate the City or any department thereof to (i) provide any financing for the Project; (ii) approve any application or request for or take any other action in connection with any planning approval, permit or other action necessary for the acquisition, construction, rehabilitation or operation of the Project; or (iii) make any contribution or advance any funds whatsoever to the Authority. The City shall not bear any responsibility for the issuance of the Bonds, the tax-exempt status of the Bonds, the repayment of the Bonds or any other matter related to the Bonds. The issuance of the Bonds shall be subject to approval of the Authority of all financing documents relating thereto to which the Authority is a party. The City shall have no responsibility or liability whatsoever with respect to repayment or administration of the Bonds.

Section 5: This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its passage. 85 Item 5.

MOVED, PASSED and ADOPTED this 15th day of February, 2022, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

Lloyd White, Mayor

ATTEST:

City Clerk

86 Item 5.

Staff Report

TO: City Council
FROM: Sean Thuilliez, Chief of Police
DATE February 15, 2022
SUBJECT: Public Hearing and First Reading to Approve an Addition to Municipal Code Section 1.16 “General Penalty” Adding Penalties for the Possession and Use of Illegal Fireworks

Background and Analysis:

A discussion was held at the January 4, 2022, City Council meeting regarding complaints received related to illegal fireworks activity following Independence Day 2021.

The Beaumont Police Department (BPD) received 138 calls reporting the use of illegal fireworks. Of these calls, officers issued six citations and confiscated a large quantity of fireworks. The BPD also responded to another 243 calls for service within the same time frame. The dispatch center handled 371 calls for service when the daily average is approximately 240 daily calls. To handle this increased call load, the department staffed an additional communications officer, a police lieutenant, sergeant and five additional officers.

In addition to fireworks enforcement, the BPD also staffs the City’s concert and fireworks show at Stewart Part on Independence Day. This event results in a considerable dedication of police officers and volunteers to provide site security and traffic control. The cost of police services for the Independence Day event in 2019 was over $10,000.

In its prior deliberation on this matter the City Council directed that penalties be increased for the possession and or use of illegal fireworks. If approved, the following will be added to Beaumont Municipal Code Chapter 1.16.030, as section “C”:

C. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a violation involving the possession or use of fireworks as defined in California Health & Safety Code §12676 and §12677 is punishable by:
87 Item 6.

i. A fine not exceeding $1,000.00 for a first violation; ii. A fine not exceeding $2,500.00 for a second violation of the same provision within one year; and
iii. A fine not exceeding $5,000.00 for each additional violation of the same provision within one year of the first violation.

The fourth violation and every violation of the same ordinance within one year may thereafter be charged as a misdemeanor.

A notification to the public was published in area newspapers on February 1, 2022.

This notification advertised the ordinance and the scheduled public hearing.

Fiscal Impact:

City staff estimates the cost to prepare this staff report to be $146.

Recommended Action:

Hold a public hearing, and
Waive the full first reading and approve by title only, “An Ordinance of the City of Beaumont Amending the Beaumont Municipal Code Chapter 1.16 Entitled ‘General Penalty’ and Making Findings Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act.”
Attachments:

A. Ordinance
B. Exhibit A to Ordinance
C. Public Notice
88 Item 6.

1 ORDINANCE NO. __

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BEAUMONT AMENDING THE
BEAUMONT MUNICIPAL CODE TO AMEND CHAPTER 1.16 ENTITLED
“GENERAL PENALTY” AND MAKING FINDINGS PURSUANT TO THE

CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BEAUMONT HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1 . Findings .

(a) In March 2002, a municipal code ordinance was enacted governing the penalties for failing to comply with any of the mandatory requirements of the ordinances of the City of Beaumont (“City”).

(b) City desires to add section 1.16.030.C to the Beaumont Municipal Code to add penalties for the possession or use of illegal fireworks in the City consistent with the City’s efforts to enforce the City’s ordinances regarding possession and or use of illegal fireworks in the City.

(c) The City desires to amend the Beaumont Municipal Code to repeal and replace chapter 1.16, to enforce and ensure compliance with the Beaumont Municipal Code chapter 9.41, Fireworks.

Section 2. CEQA. The City Council hereby finds and determines that adoption of this ordinance is not a project within the meaning of section 15378 of the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA Guidelines”) because it has no potential for resulting in physical change in the environment, either directly or ultimately. The City Council also finds the approval of this ordinance is exempt under Section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the adoption of this ordinance may have a significant effect on the environment

Section 3. Repeal and Replace Chapter 5.64. The City Council hereby repeals Chapter 1.16 of the Municipal Code, General Penalty, in its entirety, and replaces with a new Chapter 1.16 of the Municipal Code, General Penalty as set forth in Exhibit “A” attached hereto and made a part hereof by this reference.

Section 4. Severability. If any sentence, word, phrase, section or provision of this ordinance is held invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, such provision shall be considered a separate, distinct and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity and enforceability of the other provisions of this ordinance.

Section 5. Publication and Certification. The City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published at least once in a newspaper of general circulation published and circulated in the City within fifteen (15) days after its passage in accordance with Section 36933 of the Government Code, shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance, and shall cause this ordinance and certification, 89 Item 6.

2 together with proof of publication, to be entered in the book of ordinances of the Council of this City.

Section 6. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect thirty-one days after its adoption.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED that the City Council of the City of Beaumont, California, approves an amendment to the City Code.

INTRODUCED AND READ for the first time and ordered posted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Beaumont, California, held on the _____ day of ______________ 2022, by the following roll call vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Beaumont, California, held on the _____ day of _________, 2022.

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

_______________________________
Lloyd White, Mayor

Attest: _______________________________
Nicole Wheelwright, Deputy City Clerk

Approved as to form:

_______________________________
John O. Pinkney, City Attorney

90 Item 6.

1 EXHIBIT “A”

1.16.0 10 Violation —Misdemeanor —When.

Any person violating any of the provisions or failing to comply with any of the mandatory requirements of the ordinances of the City, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, unless the violation is made an infraction by ordinance.

1.16.0 20 Violation — Misdemeanor —Penalty.

Except in cases where a different punishment is prescribed by any ordinance of the City any person convicted of a misdemeanor for violation of an ordinance of the City is punishable by a fine of not more than $1,000.00, or by imprisonment not to exceed six months or by both such fine and imprisonment.

1.16.030 Violation —Infraction —Administrative fine —Penalty.

A. Except as provided in subsection B below and in cases where a different punishment is prescribed by any ordinance of the City, any person subject to code enforcement by administrative citation or convicted of an infraction for violating an ordinance of the City, is punishable by:

i. A fine not exceeding $100.00 for a first violation ; ii. A fine not exceeding $200.00 for a second violation of the same ordinance within one year ;
iii. A fine not exceeding $500.00 for each additional violation of the same ordinance within one year of the first violation.

The fourth violation and every violation of the same ordinance within one year may thereafter be charged as a misdemeanor.

B. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a violation of a City building and safety code provision is punishable by:

i. A fine not exceeding $100.00 for a first violation; ii. A fine not exceeding $500.00 for a second violation of the same provision within one year;
iii. A fine not exceeding $1,000.00 for each additional violation of the same provision within one year of the first violation.

The fourth violation and every violation of the same ordinance within one year may thereafter be charged as a misdemeanor.

C. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a violation involving the possession or use of fireworks as defined in California Health & Safety Code §12676 and §12677 is punishable by:

i. A fine not exceeding $1000.00 for a first violation; ii. A fine not exceeding $2500.00 for a second violation of the same provision within one year;
91 Item 6.

2 iii. A fine not exceeding $5,000.00 for each additional violation of the same provision within one year of the first violation.

The fourth violation and every violation of the same ordinance within one year may thereafter be charged as a misdemeanor.

1.16.0 40 Separate offense .

Each such person shall be guilty of a separate offens e for each and every day during any portion of which any violation of any provision of the ordinances of the City is committed, continued or permitted by any such person, and he shall be punishable accordingly.

92 Item 6.

1825 Chicago Ave, Suite 100
Riverside, CA 92507
951-684-1200
951-368-9018 FAX

BEAUMONT, CITY OF / LEGAL
550 E SIXTH ST
BEAUMONT, CA 92223
02/01/2022
I am a citizen of the United States. I am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to or interested in the above entitled matter. I am an authorized representative of THE PRESS-ENTERPRISE, a newspaper in general circulation, printed and published daily in the County of Riverside, and which newspaper has been adjudicated a newspaper of general circulation by the Superior Court of the County of Riverside, State of California, under date of April 25, 1952, Case Number 54446, under date of March 29, 1957, Case Number 65673, under date of August 25, 1995, Case Number 267864, and under date of September 16, 2013, Case Number RIC 1309013; that the notice, of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been published in said newspaper in accordance with the instructions of the person(s) requesting publication, and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to wit:

PROOF OF PUBLICATION OF
Ad Desc.: General Penalties, Fireworks /
I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

Date: February 01, 2022
At: Riverside, California
Ad Number: 0011515242-01
P.O. Number:

Publication(s): The Press-Enterprise
Ad Copy:

PROOF OF PUBLICATION
(2010, 2015.5 C.C.P)
Legal Advertising Representative, The Press-Enterprise
#BM_Tag::2||5209422||-||1||0;0;0#
93 Item 6.

Staff Report

TO: City Council
FROM: Doug Story, Assistant Director of Community Services DATE February 15, 2022
SUBJECT: Approve the Sponsorship of the 2022 Beaumont Cherry Festival and Allocate $100,000 from Recreation Programs Account No. 100-1550- 7040-0000

Background and Analysis:

The 103rd Cherry Festival will be held June 2 through June 5, 2022, and is a significant regional event that is synonymous with the City of Beaumont.

Through the years, the event has generated funds that have directly benefited the community through park improvements in Stewart Park. In past years, the Cherry Festival Association spent over $4,000 repairing light towers at the park.

In 2017 and 2018, the City supported this event with a $100,000 cash donation, as well as overtime expenses of the Beaumont Police Department and the waiving of park fees for the four-day event.

In 2018, City Council designated this event as one of three annual keynote e vents and directed City staff to include funding in the FY 19/20 budget. City staff is proposing that Beaumont continue its sponsorship of the program with a cash contribution of $100,000 to cover a portion of the artists’ fees and the waiver of costs for police services.

Fiscal Impact:

The fiscal impact is $100,000 from the recreation programs and City staff estimates the cost to prepare this report to be $95.

Recommended Action:

Approve the sponsorship of the 2022 Beaumont Cherry Festival and allocate $100,000 from the Recreation Programs Account No. 100-1550-7040-0000.

94 Item 7.

Staff Report

TO: City Council
FROM: Todd Parton, City Manager
DATE February 15, 2022
SUBJECT: Consider Non-Binding Memorandum of Understanding Between the City of Beaumont and the Beaumont-Cherry Valley Recreation & Park Corporation (Corporation) to Collaborate on Development of a Regional Park at the Danny Thomas Ranch

Background and Analysis:

At the meeting of February 1, 2022, the City Council voted unanimously to initiate discussions with the Beaumont - Cherry Valley Recreation and Park Improvement Corporation (Corporation) for a collaborative effort to develop a park on 123 acres of land donated to the Corporation. Said property is located on the north side of Cherry Valley Boulevard, approximately 1 mile east of IH-10, and has been formerly known as the Danny Thomas Ranch (DTR).

City Council voted to do the following:

1. Begin preliminary discussions with the Corporation to explore how a future park facility at the Danny Thomas Ranch (DTR) site might mutually benefit both agencies,

2. Appoint Mayor White and Councilmember Santos as members to a 2 by 2 committee to meet with representatives of the Corporation, and

3. Provide a report to the City Council when the City/District discussions have yielded tangible results.

Attached is a draft memorandum of understanding (MOU) that sets forth the core expectations for parties. The MOU is non-binding and automatically terminates within ten (10) years after the effective date if the park is not substantially completed. It may also be terminated at any time by either party with 30 days written notice.

This MOU has been presented to the Corporation’s legal counsel.

95 Item 8.

Fiscal Impact:

City staff estimates it cost approximately $55 to prepare this report.

Recommended Action:

Attachments:

A. Non-Binding Memorandum of Understanding Between the City of Beaumont and the Beaumont-Cherry Valley Recreation & Park Corporation to Collaborate on Development of a Regional Park at the Danny Thomas Ranch 96 Item 8.

NON-BINDING MEMORANDUM OF

UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE CITY OF

BEAUMONT

AND THE BEAUMONT - CHERRY VALLEY

RECREATION & PARK CORPORATION TO

COLLABORATE ON DEVELOPMENT OF A

REGIONAL PARK AT THE DANNY THOMAS
RANCH

RECITALS

WHEREAS, the mission of the Beaumont-Cherry Valley Recreation & Park Corporation (“Corporation”) is to enrich and fulfill the lives of community members by providing parks, park facilities and recreational programs of outstanding quality.

WHEREAS, the Corporation endeavors to achieve its mission and meet the needs of its growing community by acquiring, constructing, improving, maintaining and operating recreation centers throughout

WHEREAS, The City of Beaumont (“City”) provides park and recreational services to enhance the quality of life and meet the needs of residents living within the City’s jurisdictional boundaries.

WHEREAS, City and Corporation desire to collaborate and explore the means and strategies by which they might jointly pursue design, funding and development of a first class regional park to serve as a regional sport and recreation draw at the Danny Thomas Ranch, within their respective jurisdictional boundaries, in order to meet regional park and recreation needs.

WHEREAS, City and Corporation desire to provide for a Non-Binding Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”) in furtherance of their interests in jointly pursuing the design, funding and development of a regional park to serve residents within their jurisdictional boundaries.

WHEREAS, City and Corporation acknowledge that Corporation will serve as the lead agency in development of the proposed regional park and will maintain ownership and control over the operation and maintenance of the park once completed.

WHEREAS, City and Corporation further acknowledge that Corporation shall retain all fees and revenue collected in connection with the proposed park once completed.

97 Item 8.

AGREEMENT

NOW THEREFORE, City and Corporation agree as follows:

1. INCORPORATION OF RECITALS. The above recitals are incorporated herein by this reference.

2. IMPLEMENTATION. City and Corporation will collaborate on the design of a proposed regional park to be developed at the Danny Thomas Ranch as follows:

a. Corporation shall serve as the lead and responsible agency in connection with development of the park.

b. Corporation shall retain ownership of the park and will maintain ownership and control over the operation and maintenance of the park once completed.

c. Corporation will be entitled to retain any fees or revenues generated from operating the park once developed.

d. The proposed park will be developed to meet regional recreational and sports related needs.

e. The park shall be designed and developed to comply with applicable state and federal laws, including but not limited to, the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA).

f. Corporation and City agree that any property to be included within the park not currently within City’s jurisdictional boundaries will be annexed into the City. City and Corporation will work cooperatively and shall take any actions needed to accomplish such annexations.

g. Corporation will be responsible as the lead agency for purposes of environmental review and for obtaining all permits and coordinating all construction.

3. INSURANCE AND RISK ALLOCATION.

a. Corporation shall maintain all insurance required to construct, operate and maintain the park naming City as an additional insured.

b. It is further understood that any responsibility for alleged injuries or damages arising from the existence or use of the park shall be governed by and subject to provisions of the California Tort Claims Act.

4. TERM AND TERMINATION OF THIS MOU.

a. This Non-binding MOU may be terminated without cause at any time by either party upon thirty (30) days written notice or by mutual agreement of City and Corporation.

98 Item 8.

b. This MOU shall terminate automatically if the park is not substantially completed within ten (10) years after execution of this MOU.

5. EFFECTIVE DATE. This MOU shall be effective upon date of its execution by all parties.

6. NON-BINDING. This MOU sets forth the intent of City and Corporation to cooperatively pursue planning, design and development of a regional park, but is non-binding and may be terminated at any time by either City or Corporation.

APPROVED BY:

Lloyd White, Mayor
City of Beaumont
Date

Dan Hughes,
Beaumont -Cherry Valley Recreation &
Park Corporation
Date

Approved As To Form:

John Pinkney, Beaumont City Attorney

Albert Maldonado, General Counsel,
Beaumont-Cherry Valley Recreation & Park Corporation

99 Item 8.

Staff Report

TO: City Council
FROM: Doug Story, Assistant Director of Community Services DATE February 15, 2022
SUBJECT: Subscription Renewal Amendment for Dossier Systems Vehicle Repair Order Program

Background and Analysis:

On March 5, 2019, City Council approved the purchase and 36-month subscription to Dossier On-Demand and is set to expire March 5, 2022. For the last three years the Dossier vehicle maintenance software has been integrated into the preventative maintenance and emergency maintenance tracking for all vehicles, in all City departments. This software system has proven to be efficient and effective and has allowed City staff to accurately track time and materials when working on specific vehicles for individual departments. Dossier gives the vehicle maintenance department the ability to create, edit, and submit repair orders and internal invoices on all vehicles within the fleet. The system tracks parts inventory, total cost of repairs, maintenance costs, repair order history, maintenance reminders, and cost per mile for each vehicle.

Additionally, City staff is automatically notified when safety alerts or potential warranty issues are released for fleet vehicles. Dossier is internet based and technicians can access the system and have data available wherever there is internet access. This allows the review of vehicle service history on the scene of incidents or wherever a vehicle may need a technicians’ assistance.

The amended 36-month subscription renewal includes the ability to integrate with Zonar Systems, a software currently used by the City’s Transit Department. Zonar is a pre/post-trip system used by Transit drivers to inspect their vehicle before and after the vehicle leaves the yard for service. The new subscrip tion will also increase the subscription portfolio from 150 to 200 assets/vehicles. The increased number of assets are necessary for the City’s growing fleet as well as the additional operational equipment vehicle maintenance staff will be working on. Additional equipment includes lawnmowers, weed eaters, stump grinders, chippers, and other landscape tools.

The renewal order, with the additional assets and Zonar integration, will bring the total amount of the 36-month term to $34,787.06. This amount include s an initial activation 100
Item 9.

fee of $1,782.50 for the additional new assets and quarterly fees of $2,750.38 for the 36-month term.

Fiscal Impact:

The total cost of $34,787.06 will be paid from the Transit Services Fund from 750 -7300- 7071-0000. This amount is allocated in the FY21/22 approved budget and all future budgets will include this quarterly amount for the term of the agreement.

Recommended Action:

Attachments:

A. Dossier Original Agreement
B. Dossier on-Demand Order Form
101
Item 9.

102
Item 9.

103
Item 9.

104
Item 9.

105
Item 9.

106
Item 9.

107
Item 9.

108
Item 9.

109
Item 9.

110
Item 9.

111
Item 9.

112
Item 9.

113
Item 9.

114
Item 9.

115
Item 9.

116
Item 9.

117
Item 9.

118
Item 9.

119
Item 9.

120
Item 9.

121
Item 9.

122
Item 9.

24 January 2022 City_of_Beaumont_DOD_Order_Form_24JAN2022 Dossier Systems Page 1 of 1 Dossier On-Demand Order Form – Rev. 18 May 2020 6 Terri Lane Suite 700
Burlington NJ 08016
O. 609.747.8800 F. 609.747.8801

www.dossier.systems
[email protected]

DOSSIER ON-DEMAND (DOD) ORDER FORM
For
City of Beaumont
This DOD ORDER FORM defines the Subscription to the DOD SERVICE offered in accordance with the Dossier On-Demand (DOD) TERMS OF SERVICE (included herein by reference), to be provided by Dossier Systems, Inc. (COMPANY) to City of Beaumont (CUSTOMER) as follows:

CUSTOMER PORTFOLIO: CUSTOMER’s Subscription to the DOD SERVICE includes:
· Dossier Professional Edition with the following:
· Two hundred (200) Maximum Assets (vehicles, equipment, units, etc.) · One (1) Full Named User
· Four (4) Technician Named Users
· Four (4) Reporting Named Users
· Inventory, Personnel, Vendor, Advanced Reporting
· Barcode
· Fuel and Meter Import
· Dossier On-Board Telematics Integration as follows: Zonar, meters, DTCs, eDVIR Quantity = 20

SUBSCRIPTION TERM: Beginning 05 March 2022 and continuing for 36 months.

FEES AND OTHER CHARGES:

TOTAL FEES DUE UPON RECEIPT OF ORDER: $1,782.50
Activation Fee: $1,782.50 (with this renewal, you are increasing the subscription portfolio by fifty (50) moving your portfolio from 150 to 200 Maximum assets)
First Installment of SUBSCRIPTION FEES: $2,750.38, based on quarterly billing. i.e. the SUBSCRIPTION SERVICE PERIOD. (Due in advance of the NEXT SUBSCRIPTION SERVICE PERIOD, presently, your account subscription is paid through 05 March 2022)

Please note: You are also adding one additional Dossier On-Board (DOB) Unit to the portfolio bringing total unit count from 19 to 20 DOB Units. The first initial invoice will include a prorated subscription fee to sync the additional DOB unit to the current DOB quarterly billing cycle currently paid through 5 March 2022.

Ongoing SUBSCRIPTION FEES (Recurring for the duration of the SUBSCRIPTION TERM), due in advance of each SUBSCRIPTION SERVICE PERIOD: $2,750.38
Authorized on behalf of CUSTOMER by:

Signature: /s/______________________________________

Name (print): /n/ ___________________________________

Title: /t/_________________________________________

Order Date: /d/____________________________________

CUSTOMER Purchase Order Number (if applicable): /po/______________________________________________

Commercial Clarifications:

1. Offer validity: 30 days from date of issue.
123
Item 9.

Staff Report

TO: City Council
FROM: Todd Parton, City Manager
DATE February 15, 2022
SUBJECT: Consider Resolution Adopting a Policy Statement to Encourage but Not Mandate or Require Contractors to “Hire Locally” and Use a “Skilled and Trained Workforce” within the Meaning of Public Contract Code Section 2601(d) for Any Construction Activities Related to an “Apprenticeable Occupation” Pursuant to Public Contract Code Section 2601(a) for Projects 30,000 Square Feet or Larger

Background and Analysis:

Project: State law requires each county and city to prepare and adopt a 20 -year comprehensive and long-range general plan for its physical development (Gov. Code § 65300). On or about November 17, 2020, the City Council of the City of Beaumont (“City”) (1) approved the Beaumont General Plan Update (“Beaumont 2040 Plan”), Zoning Code Amendment, and Zoning Map, and (2) certified the Final Program Environmental Impact Report for the Beaumont 2040 Plan, adopting Findings of Fact s and a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and adopting the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (“the Project”).

Lawsuit: On or about December 17, 2020, the Southwest Regional Council of Carpenters (“Petitioner”) filed an action against the City entitled Southwest Regional Council of Carpenters v. City of Beaumont, in Riverside County Superior Court, Case No. CVR120000653, seeking to enjoin the City’s November 17, 2020 action, and demanding a writ of mandate, declaratory and injunctive relief under the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") ("Lawsuit"). Petitioner alleged that the City violated CEQA, Pub. Res. Code § 21000 et seq.; and State Planning and Zoning Law, Gov.

Code § 65000 et seq. in approving the Project.

Settlement Agreement/Dismissal: On January 10, 2022, the parties entered into a Settlement Agreement and Release. The lawsuit was dismissed with prejudice on January 19, 2022.
124
Item 10.

Proposed Resolution: As part of the settlement agreement, the City Council for the City of Beaumont agreed to consider a resolution adopting a policy statement to encourage but not mandate or require contractors to “hire locally”1 and use a “skilled and trained workforce”2 for any construction activities related to an “apprenticeable occupation”3 for projects 30,000 square feet or larger. The term “encourage” means to make the resolution, if ultimately adopted, available through the City’s website ( https://www.beaumontca.gov/) and to provide a copy to developers of projects 30,000 square feet or larger within the City’s jurisdictional limits. The City has no obligation to qualify, monitor or report on the labor forces hired for local projects. Pursuant to the settlement agreement, the City Council retains full discretion to approve or disapprove the proposed resolution.

Fiscal Impact:

No fiscal impacts are anticipated, except for minimal printing costs to provide copies of the resolution to developers of projects 30,000 square feet or larger within the City’s jurisdictional limits.

Recommended Action:

The following options are provided for City Council’s consideration:

1. Waive the full reading and adopt the resolution by title only, “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Beaumont, California, Adopting a Policy Statement to Encourage but Not Mandate or Require Contractors to “Hire Locally” and Use a “Skilled and Trained Workforce” within the Meaning of Public Contract Code Section 2601(d) for Any Construction Activities Related to an “Apprentice able Occupation” Pursuant to Public Contract Code Section 2601(a) for Projects 30,000 Square Feet or Larger,”
or

2. Do not approve resolution and provide staff with further direction.

1 The definition of ”hire locally” means at least 30 percent of the construction workforce for construction activities 30,000 square feet or larger should reside within 10 miles of the City of Beaumont. 2 “Skilled and trained workforce” is defined in Public Contract Code section 2601(d). Section 6 (d) of the proposed Resolution sets forth the specific definition. 3 “Apprenticeable Occupation” under Public Contract Code section 2601(a) means an occupation for which the Chief of the Division of Apprenticeship Standards of the Department of Industrial Relations had approved an apprenticeship program pursuant to Section 3075 of the Labor Code before January 1, 2014.
125
Item 10.

Attachments:

A. Draft Resolution
126
Item 10.

Page 1 of 4 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 2022-___

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BEAUMONT,

CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A POLICY STATEMENT TO ENCOURAGE BUT NOT MANDATE OR REQUIRE CONTRACTORS TO “HIRE LOCALLY” AND USE A “SKILLED AND TRAINED WORKFORCE” WITHIN THE MEANING OF PUBLIC CONTRACT CODE SECTION 2601(d) FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES RELATED TO AN “APPRENTICEABLE OCCUPATION” PURSUANT TO PUBLIC CONTRACT CODE SECTION 2601(a) FOR PROJECTS 30,000 SQUARE FEET OR LARGER.

WHEREAS, the City recognizes the importance of requiring the use of apprentices and graduates of apprenticeship as a means to ensure that a qualified workforce is employed on public works projects;
WHEREAS, the skilled and trained standard is used to help ensure quality wor k and protect against accidents;
WHEREAS, use of a local state certified apprenticeship program or a skilled and trained workforce with a local hire component can help demonstrate emission reductions; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Beaumont desires to adopt a policy encouraging but not mandating or requiring contractors to hire locally and use a skilled and trained workforce, as defined below.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Beaumont, California, hereby adopts this Policy Statement:

SECTION 1: The City shall adopt a policy statement to encourage but not mandate or require contractors to “hire locally” and use a “skilled and trained workforce” for any construction activities related to an “apprenticeable occupation” for projects 30,000 square feet or larger.

SECTION 2: The definition of ”hire locally” for purposes of this Policy Statement means at least 30 percent of the construction workforce for construction activities 30,000 square feet or larger should reside within 10 miles of the City of Beaumont.

SECTION 3: The definition of “skilled and trained workforce” for purposes of this Policy Statement is defined below and in conformance with Public Contract Code section 2601(d).

SECTION 4: The definition of “apprenticeable occupation” for purposes of this Policy Statement is defined below and in conformance with Public Contract Code section 2601(a).

SECTION 5: As used in Section 1, the term “encourage” means to make the Resolution, if ultimately adopted, available through the City’s website ( https://www.beaumontca.gov/) and to provide a copy to developers of projects 30,000 square feet or larger within the City’s 127
Item 10.

Page 2 of 4 ends

jurisdictional limits. These are the only obligations the City has to Southwest Regional Council of Carpenters under this Resolution. The City has no obligation to qualify, monitor or report on the labor forces hired for local projects. In the event that the City should fail to provide a copy of the Resolution pursuant to this Section, the City shall have thirty (30) days after receiving written notice from Southwest Regional Council of Carpenters of said failure upon which to cure (“Cure Period”). Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, the parties agree that this Resolution does not apply to Chapter 2.9 of the Skilled and Trained Workforce Requirements (Public Contract Code sections 2600, et seq.).The City shall have no obligations under Chapter 2.9 of the Skilled and Trained Workforce Requirements (Public Contract Code sections 2600, et seq.), including but not limited to, any notice, monitoring, penalties or reporting requirements, or verification of conditions met under the “Skilled and Trained Workforce” definition on the labor forces hired for local projects.

SECTION 6: For the application of this Policy Statement, the following definitions pursuant to California Public Contract Code section 2601 applies:
(a) “Apprenticeable Occupation” means an occupation for which the Chief of the Division of Apprenticeship Standards of the Department of Industrial Relations had approved an apprenticeship program pursuant to Section 3075 of the Labor Code before January 1, 2014. (b) "Chief" means the Chief of the Division of Apprenticeship Standards of the Department of Industrial Relations.
(c) "Graduate of an Apprenticeship Program" means either of the following: (1) An individual that has been issued a certificate of completion under the authority of the California Apprenticeship Council for completing an apprenticeship program approved by the Chief pursuant to Section 3075 of the Labor Code; or (2) An individual that has completed an apprenticeship program located outside California and approved for federal purposes pursuant to the apprenticeship regulations adopted by the federal Secretary of Labor. (d) “Skilled and Trained Workforce” means a workforce that meets all of the following conditions:
(1) All the workers performing work in an Apprenticeable Occupation in the building and construction trades are either Skilled Journeypersons or apprentices registered in an apprenticeship program approved by the Chief.
(2) At least sixty (60) percent of the Skilled Journeypersons employed to perform work within the scope of the construction contract or project by every contractor and each of its subcontractors at every tier are Graduates of an Apprenticeship Program for the applicable occupation.

Pursuant to Public Contract Code Section 2601, this Policy Statement shall not apply to work performed in the following occupations:
128
Item 10.

Page 3 of 4 ends

acoustical installer, bricklayer, carpenter, cement mason, drywall installer or lather, marble mason, finisher, or setter, modular furniture or systems installer, operating engineer, pile driver, plasterer, roofer or waterproofer, stone mason, surveyor, teamster, terrazzo worker or finisher, and tile layer, setter, or finisher.
(3) For an Apprenticeable Occupation in which no apprenticeship program had been approved by the Chief before January 1, 1995, up to one-half of the graduation percentage requirements may be satisfied by Skilled Journeypersons who commenced working in the Apprenticeable Occupation before the Chief's approval of an apprenticeship program for that occupation in the County of Riverside.
(4) The above apprenticeship graduation percentage requirements are satisfied if, in a particular calendar month, either of the following is true:
(A) At least the required percentage of the Skilled Journeypersons employed by the contractor or subcontractor to perform work on the contract or project meet the graduation percentage requirement; or (B) For the hours of work performed by Skilled Journeypersons employed by the contractor or subcontractor on the contract or project , the percentage of hours performed by Skilled Journeypersons who met the graduation requirement is at least equal to the required graduation percentage.
(5) The contractor or subcontractor need not meet the apprenticeship graduation requirements above if, during the calendar month, the contractor or subcontractor employs Skilled Journeypersons to perform fewer than 10 hours of work on the contract or project. (6) A subcontractor need not meet the apprenticeship graduation requirements specified in this Policy Statement if both of the following requirements are met: (A) The subcontractor was not required to be a listed subcontractor under Public Contract Code section 4104 or was not a substitute for a listed subcontractor; and (B) The subcontract does not exceed one-half of 1 percent of the price of the prime contract. (e) “Skilled Journeyperson” means a worker who either: (1) Graduated from an apprenticeship program for the applicable occupation that was approved by the Chief or which was located outside California and approved for federal purposes pursuant to the apprenticeship regulations adopted by the federal Secretary of Labor; or (2) Has at least as many hours of on-the-job experience in the applicable occupation as would be required to graduate from an apprenticeship program for the applicable occupation that is approved by the Chief.
129
Item 10.

Page 4 of 4 ends

SECTION 7: The City has no obligation to qualify, monitor or report on the labor forces hired for local projects. As set forth in Section 5, the use of Public Contract Code section 2601 is used solely for the purpose of defining “Skilled and Trained Workforce” and “Apprenticeable Occupation” under Section 6 of this Resolution, and by no means requires the City to substantiate or verify that the project applicants have met the conditions under these definitions. Moreover, none of the other sections under Chapter 2.9 of the Skilled and Trained Workforce Requirements (Public Contract Code sections 2600, et seq.) are applicable to this Resolution, including, but not limited to, Public Contract Code sections 2600 (applicability of chapter), 2600.5 (failure to provide notice; obligations not excused), 2602 (enforceable commitments; required provisions), and 2603 (failure to use skilled and trained workforce; penalty).

SECTION 8: This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its passage and adoption.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Beaumont, California, held on the ____ day of February 2022, by the following roll call vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

________________________________
Lloyd White, Mayor Pro Tem

Attest:

________________________
Steven Mehlman, City Clerk

Approved as to form:

___________________________
John O. Pinkney, City Attorney

130
Item 10.

Staff Report

TO: Mayor and City Council Members
FROM: Jeff Hart, Public Works Director
DATE February 15, 2022
SUBJECT: Award a Professional Services Agreement to Albert A. Webb Associates to Provide Engineering and Design Services for the Beaumont Mesa Lift Station and Force Main Project in an Amount Not to Exceed $536,785

Background and Analysis:

The Beaumont Mesa Lift Station conveys wastewater from five upstream lift stations:

Fairway Canyon, Lower Oak Valley, Upper Oak Valley, Olivewood, and Middle Oak (temporary) lift stations. The lift station conveys these flows to the City’s Wastewater Treatment Plant through an existing 12-inch force main. The City’s recent 2021 Wastewater Master Plan identifies the Beaumont Mesa Lift Statio n as deficient to meet the future needs of the rapidly developing area. Existing pumps are undersized to meet future flows, and the existing wet well is undersized for providing the required emergency capacity and response time. The existing 12-inch force main is also undersized for future wastewater flows.

Beaumont Mesa Lift Station and Force Main Project:

As part of the five-year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP), the City Council has budgeted the design of the Beaumont Mesa Lift Station and Force Main Project in order to resolve these deficiencies. Preliminary design efforts will include the following:

 A review of potential environmental concerns, jurisdictional requirements, permitting requirements, and right-of-way concerns;
 Geotechnical Investigation;
 Wastewater System hydraulic and operational analysis;  Completion of Environmental documentation required by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA);
 Detailed Engineers Construction Cost Estimates; and
 Coordination with Southern California Edison (SCE) for increased service capacity.
131
Item 11.

Final design efforts include the preparation of detailed construction documents including construction drawings and specifications. Final design efforts will include the following:

 Design of a new pump configuration for increased pumping capacity,  Design of additional wet well volume for increased wet well capacity,  Design of a new 16-inch force main to parallel the exiting 12-inch force main, and  Lift station site improvements including replacement of outdated equipment.

City staff prepared a Request for Proposal (RFP) for the Beaumont Mesa Lift Station and Force Main Project. The project was advertised November 22, 2021, and four (4) proposals were received on January 10, 2022. Each firm was evaluated by a four- person panel based on the following criteria:

 Project Approach and Scope of Services (25%),
 Project Team Organization and Qualifications (20%),
 Related Experience and Past Projects (25%),
 References (10%), and
 Proposed Fee (20%).

After review of proposals and interviews with top candidates, City staff is recommending Albert A. Webb Associates (Webb) to perform engineering and design services for the project. Webb’s proposal demonstrated the most efficient approach to environmental and permitting requirements, the greatest familiarity with the local conditions of the project site and a proven history of delivering reliable engineering services for the City.

Webb has partnered with the City on several recent projects including the design of the Wastewater Treatment Plant and the Brine Line project and is familiar with City standards and local project conditions. The cost of services to complete the project design is $536,785.

City staff anticipates completion of environmental documentation and construction documents one year from project kick-off.

132
Item 11.

Project Accounting Update:

The following table is an overview of project funding available:

Project Funding Summary
SLFRF Program $400,000
Wastewater DIF $450,000

Total Project Funding $850,000

The following table is an overview the project accounting summary:

WW-04 & WW-05 Project Summary
Project Components Budget Amount Paid to Date Remaining Project Management
Project Contingency
Preliminary Services $24,400.00 $24,400.00
Preliminary Services Contingency
Environmental
Environmental Contingency
Design $536,785.00 $536,785.00
Design Contingency $38,000.00 $38,000.00
Construction
Construction Contingency
Construction Management
Construction Management
Contingency

Permits
Equipment
Misc.

Project Summary Totals $599,185.00 $0.00 $599,185.00

Fiscal Impact:

The professional services agreement in an amount not to exceed $536,785 for the Beaumont Mesa Lift Station and Force Main Project will be paid from the CIP project’s WW-04 and WW-05. City staff estimates the cost to prepare this report to be $440.

133
Item 11.

Recommended Action:

Attachments:

A. Professional Services Agreement – Beaumont Mesa Lift Station and Force Main Project
B. Webb Associates Proposal to provide Professional Engineering Services for the Beaumont Mesa Lift Station and Force Main Project
134
Item 11.

Page 1 of 10 ends

AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BY INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR

THIS AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BY INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR is made and effective as of the 15th day of February, 2022, by and between the CITY OF BEAUMONT (“CITY”) whose address is 550 E. 6th Street, Beaumont, California 92223 and Albert A. Webb Associates whose address is 3788 McCray Street, Riverside, CA 92506 (“CONTRACTOR”).

RECITALS

This Agreement is entered into on the basis of the following facts, understandings and intentions of the parties to this Agreement:

A. CITY desires to engage CONTRACTOR to provide Engineering and Design Services for the Beaumont Mesa Lift Station and Force Main Project; and

B. CONTRACTOR has made a proposal (“Proposal”) to the CITY to provide such professional services, which Proposal is attached hereto as Exhibit “A”; and

C. CONTRACTOR agrees to provide such services pursuant to, and in accordance with, the terms and conditions of this Agreement, and represents and warrants to CITY that CONTRACTOR possesses the necessary skills, licenses, certifications, qualifications, personnel and equipment to provide such services.

AGREEMENT

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing Recitals and mutual covenants contained herein, CITY and CONTRACTOR agree as follows:

1. Term of Agreement. This Agreement is effective as of the date first above written and shall continue until terminated as provided for herein. Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement, this Agreement shall automatically terminate after three (3) years unless extended by the parties with the approval of the City Council of the CITY.

2. Services to be Performed. CONTRACTOR agrees to provide the services (“Services”) as follows: Engineering and Design Services for the Beaumont Mesa Lift Station and Force Main Project and any other services which the City may request in writing.

All Services shall be performed in the manner and according to the timeframe set forth in the Proposal. CONTRACTOR designates __Brian Knoll_ as CONTRACTOR’S professional responsible for overseeing the Services provided by CONTRACTOR.

3. Associates and Subcontractors. CONTRACTOR may, at CONTRACTOR’s sole cost and expense, employ such competent and qualified independent associates, subcontractors and consultants as CONTRACTOR deems necessary to perform the Services; provided, however, that CONTRACTOR shall not subcontract any of the Services without the written consent of CITY.
135
Item 11.

2 4. Compensation.

4.01 CITY agrees to pay CONTRACTOR the amount as set forth in the Proposal. CONTRACTOR shall be paid at the rates set forth in the Proposal and shall not increase any rate without the prior written consent of the CITY. Not with standing anything in this Agreement to the contrary, total fees and charges paid by City to CONTRACTOR under this Agreement shall not exceed Five Hundred Thirty Six Thousand Seven Hundred Eighty Five Dollars ($536,785)

4.02 CONTRACTOR shall not be compensated for any Services rendered nor reimbursed for any expenses incurred in excess of those authorized unless approved in advance by the CITY, in writing.

4.03 CONTRACTOR shall submit to CITY, on or before the fifteenth (15th) of each month, itemized invoices for the Services rendered in the previous month. The CITY shall not be obligated to pay any invoice that is submitted more than sixty (60) days after the due date of such invoice. CITY shall have the right to review and audit all invoices prior to or after payment to CONTRACTOR. This review and audit may include, but not be limited to CITY’s:

a. Determination that any hourly fee charged is consistent with this Agreement's approved hourly rate schedule;
b. Determination that the multiplication of the hours billed times the approved rate schedule dollars is correct;
c. Determination that each item charged is the usual, customary, and reasonable charge for the particular item. If CITY determines an item charged is greater than usual, customary, or reasonable, or is duplicative, ambiguous, excessive, or inappropriate, CITY shall either return the bill to CONTRACTOR with a request for explanation or adjust the payment accordingly, and give notice to CONTRACTOR of the adjustment.

4.04 If the work is satisfactorily completed, CITY shall pay such invoice within thirty (30) days of its receipt. Should CITY dispute any portion of any invoice, CITY shall pay the undisputed portion within the time stated above, and at the same time advice CONTRACTOR in writing of the disputed portion.

5. Obligations of CONTRACTOR.

5.01 CONTRACTOR agrees to perform all Services in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement and the Proposal. In the event that the terms of the Proposal shall conflict with the terms of this Agreement, or contain additional terms other than the Services to be rendered and the price for the Services, the terms of this Agreement shall govern and said additional or conflicting terms shall be of no force or effect.

5.02 Except as otherwise agreed by the parties, CONTRACTOR will supply all 136
Item 11.

3 personnel, materials and equipment required to perform the Services. CONTRACTOR shall provide its own offices, telephones, vehicles and computers and set its own work hours. CONTRACTOR will determine the method, details, and means of performing the Services under this Agreement.

5.03 CONTRACTOR shall keep CITY informed as to the progress of the Services by means of regular and frequent consultations. Additionally, when requested by CITY, CONTRACTOR shall prepare written status reports.

5.04 CONTRACTOR is responsible for paying, when d ue, all income and other taxes, fees and withholding, including withholding state and federal taxes, social security, unemployment and worker’s compensation, incurred as a result of the compensation paid under this Agreement. CONTRACTOR agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless CITY for any claims, costs, losses, fees, penalties, interest, or damages suffered by CITY resulting from CONTRACTOR’s failure to comply with this provision.

5.05 In the event CONTRACTOR is required to prepare plans, drawings, specifications and/or estimates, the same shall be furnished in conformance with local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations.

5.06 CONTRACTOR represents that it possesses all required licenses necessary or applicable to the performance of Services under this Agreement and the Proposal and shall obtain and keep in full force and effect all permits and approvals required to perform the Services herein. In the event CITY is required to obtain an approval or permit from another governmental entity, CONTRACTOR shall provide all necessary supporting documents to be filed with such entity.

5.07 CONTRACTOR shall be solely responsible for obtaining Employment Eligibility Verification information from CONTRACTOR’s employees, in compliance with the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986, Pub. L. 99-603 (8 U.S.C. 1324a), and shall ensure that CONTRACTOR’s employees are eligible to work in the United States.

5.08 In the event that CONTRACTOR employs, contracts with, or otherwise utilizes any CalPers retirees in completing any of the Services performed hereunder, such instances shall be disclosed in advance to the CITY and shall be subject to the CITY’s advance written approval.

5.09 Drug-free Workplace Certification. By signing this Agreement, the CONTRACTOR hereby certifies under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the CONTRACTOR will comply with the requirements of the Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1990 (Government Code, Section 8350 et seq.) and will provide a drug-free workplace.

5.10 CONTRACTOR shall comply with all applicable local, state and federal laws, rules, regulations, entitlements and/or permits applicable to, or governing the Services authorized hereunder.

137
Item 11.

4 6. Insurance. CONTRACTOR hereby agrees to be solely responsible for the health and safety of its employees and agents in performing the Services under this Agreement and shall comply with all laws applicable to worker safety including but not limited to Cal-OSHA.

Therefore, throughout the duration of this Agreement, CONTRACTOR hereby covenants and agrees to maintain insurance in conformance with the requirements set forth below. If existing coverage does not meet the requirements set forth herein, CONTRACTOR agrees to amend, supplement or endorse the existing coverage to do so. CONTRACTOR shall provide the following types and amounts of insurance:

6.01 Commercial general liability insurance in an amount of not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence and $2,000,000 in the aggregate; CONTRACTOR agrees to have its insurer endorse the general liability coverage required herein to include as additional insured’s CITY, its officials, employees and agents. CONTRACTOR also agrees to require all contractors and subcontractors to provide the same coverage required under this Section 6.

6.02 Business Auto Coverage in an amount no less than $1 million per accident. If CONTRACTOR or CONTRACTOR’s employees will use personal autos in performance of the Services hereunder, CONTRACTOR shall provide evidence of personal auto liability coverage for each such person.

6.03 Workers’ Compensation coverage for any of CONTRACTOR’s employees that will be providing any Services hereunder. CONTRACTOR will have a state-approved policy form providing statutory benefits as required by California law.

The provisions of any workers’ compensation will not limit the obligations of CONTRACTOR under this Agreement. CONTRACTOR expressly agrees not to use any statutory immunity defenses under such laws with respect to CITY, its employees, officials and agents.

6.04 Optional Insurance Coverage. Choose and check one: Required _X_ /Not Required ___; Errors and omissions insurance in a minimum amount of $2 million per occurrence to cover any negligent acts or omissions committed by CONTRACTOR, its employees and/or agents in the performance of any Services for CITY.

7. General Conditions pertaining to Insurance Coverage

7.01 No liability insurance coverage provided shall prohibit CONTRACTOR from waiving the right of subrogation prior to a loss. CONTRACTOR waives all rights of subrogation against CITY regardless of the applicability of insurance proceeds and shall require all contractors and subcontractors to do likewise.

7.02. Prior to beginning the Services under this Agreement, CONTRACTOR shall furnish CITY with certificates of insurance, endorsements, and upon request, complete copies of all policies, including complete copies of all endorsements. All copies of policies and endorsements shall show the signature of a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf.

7.03. All required policies shall be issued by a highly rated insurer with a 138
Item 11.

5 minimum A.M. Best rating of “A:VII”). The insurer(s) shall be admitted and licensed to do business in California. The certificates of insurance hereunder shall state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided, canceled by either party, or reduced in coverage or in limits, except after thirty (30) days' prior written notice has been given to CITY.

7.04 Self-insurance does not comply with these insurance specifications.

CONTRACTOR acknowledges and agrees that that all insurance coverage required to be provided by CONTRACTOR or any subcontractor, shall apply first and on a primary, non-contributing basis in relation to any other insurance, indemnity or self-insurance available to CITY.

7.05 All coverage types and limits required are subject to approval, modification and additional requirements by CITY, as the need arises. CONTRACTOR shall not make any reductions in scope of coverage (e.g. elimination of contractual liability or reduction of discovery period) that may affect CITY’s protection without CITY’s prior written consent.

7.06 CONTRACTOR agrees to provide immediate notice to CITY of any claim or loss against CONTRACTOR or arising out of the Services performed under this Agreement. CITY assumes no obligation or liability by such notice, but has the right (but not the duty) to monitor the handling of any such claim or claims if they are likely to involve CITY.

8. Indemnification.

8.01 CONTRACTOR and CITY agree that CITY, its employees, agents and officials should, to the extent permitted by law, be fully protected from any loss, injury, damage, claim, lawsuit, cost, expense, attorneys’ fees, litigation costs, defense costs, court costs or any other costs arising out of or in any way rel ated to the performance of this Agreement by CONTRACTOR or any subcontractor or agent of either. Accordingly, the provisions of this indemnity are intended by the parties to be interpreted and construed to provide the fullest protection possible under the law to CITY.

CONTRACTOR acknowledges that CITY would not enter into this Agreement in the absence of the commitment of CONTRACTOR to indemnify and protect CITY as set forth herein.

a. To the fullest extent permitted by law, CONTRACTOR shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless CITY, its employees, agents and officials, from any liability, claims, suits, actions, arbitration proceedings, administrative proceedings, regulatory proceedings, losses, expenses, damages or costs of any kind, whether actual, alleged or threatened, actual attorneys’ fees incurred by CITY, court costs, interest, defense costs, including expert witness fees and any other costs or expenses of any kind whatsoever without restriction or limitation incurred in relation to, as a consequence of or arising out of or in any way attributable actually, allegedly or impliedly, in whole or in part to the performance of this Agreement. CONTRACTOR’s obligation to defend, indemnify and hold harmless shall include any and all claims, suits and proceedings in which CONTRACTOR (and/or CONTRACTOR’s agents and/or employees) is alleged 139
Item 11.

6 to be an employee of CITY. All obligations under this provision are to be paid by CONTRACTOR as they are incurred by CITY.

b. Without affecting the rights of CITY under an y provision of this Agreement or this Section, CONTRACTOR shall not be required to indemnify and hold harmless CITY as set forth above for liability attributable solely to the fault of CITY, provided such fault is determined by agreement between the parties or the findings of a court of competent jurisdiction.

9. Additional Services, Changes and Deletions.

9.01 In the event CONTRACTOR performs additional or different services than those described herein without the prior written approval of the City Manager and/or City Council of CITY, CONTRACTOR shall not be compensated for such services.

CONTRACTOR expressly waives any right to be compensated for services and materials not covered by the scope of this Agreement or authorized by the CITY in writing.

9.02 CONTRACTOR shall promptly advise the City Manager and Finance Director of CITY as soon as reasonably practicable upon gaining knowledge of a condition, event or accumulation of events which may affect the scope and/or cost of Services. All proposed changes, modifications, deletions and/or requests for additional services shall be reduced to writing for review and approval by the CITY and/or City Council.

10. Termination of Agreement.

10.01 Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, CITY, at its sole option, may terminate this Agreement with or without cause, or for no cause, at any time by giving twenty (20) days’ written notice to CONTRACTOR.

10.02 In the event of termination, the payment of monies due CONTRACTOR for undisputed Services performed prior to the effective date of such termination shall be paid within thirty (30) business days after receipt of an invoice as provided in this Agreement. Immediately upon termination, CONTRACTOR agrees to promptly provide and deliver to CITY all original documents, reports, studies, plans, specifications and the like which are in the possession or control of CONTRACTOR and pertain to CITY.

11. Status of CONTRACTOR.

11.01 CONTRACTOR shall perform the Services in CONTRACTOR’s own way as an independent contractor, and in pursuit of CONTRACTOR’s independent calling, and not as an employee of CITY. However, CONTRACTOR shall regularly confer with CITY’s City Manager as provided for in this Agreement.

11.02 CONTRACTOR agrees that it is not entitled to the rights and benefits afforded to CITY’s employees, including disability or unemployment insurance, workers’ compensation, retirement, CalPers, medical insurance, sick leave, or any other employment benefit. CONTRACTOR is responsible for providing, at its own expense, 140
Item 11.

7 disability, unemployment, workers’ compensation and other insurance, training, permits, and licenses for itself and its employees and subcontractors.

11.03 CONTRACTOR hereby specifically represents and warrants to CITY that it possesses the qualifications and skills necessary to perform the Services under this Agreement in a competent, professional manner, without the advice or direction of CITY and that the Services to be rendered pursuant to this Agreement shall be performed in accordance with the standards customarily applicable to an experienced and competent professional rendering the same or similar services in the same geographic area where the CITY is located. Further, CONTRACTOR represents and warrants that the individual signing this Agreement on behalf of CONTRACTOR has the full authority to bind CONTRACTOR to this Agreement.

12. Ownership of Documents; Audit.

12.01 All draft and final reports, plans, drawings, studies, maps, photographs, specifications, data, notes, manuals, warranties and all other documents of any kind or nature prepared, developed or obtained by CONTRACTOR in conn ection with the performance of Services performed for the CITY shall become the sole property of CITY, and CONTRACTOR shall promptly deliver all such materials to CITY upon request. At the CITY’s sole discretion, CONTRACTOR may be permitted to retain original documents, and furnish reproductions to CITY upon request, at no cost to CITY.

12.02 Subject to applicable federal and state laws, rules and regulations, CITY shall hold all intellectual property rights to any materials developed pursuant to this Agreement. CONTRACTOR shall not such use data or documents for purposes other than the performance of this Agreement, nor shall CONTRACTOR release, reproduce, distribute, publish, adapt for future use or any other purposes, or otherwise use, any data or other materials first produced in the performance of this Agreement, nor authorize others to do so, without the prior written consent of CITY.

12.03 CONTRACTOR shall retain and maintain, for a period not less than four years following termination of this Agreement, all time records, accounting records and vouchers and all other records with respect to all matters concerning Services performed, compensation paid and expenses reimbursed. At any time during normal business hours and as often as CITY may deem necessary, CONTRACTOR shall make available to CITY’s agents for examination all of such records and shall permit CITY’s agents to audit, examine and reproduce such records.

13. Miscellaneous Provisions.

13.01 This Agreement, which includes all attached exhibits, supersedes any and all previous agreements, either oral or written, between the parties hereto with respect to the rendering of Services by CONTRACTOR for CITY and contains all of the covenants and agreements between the parties with respect to the rendering of such Services in any manner whatsoever. Any modification of this Agreement will be effective only if it is in writing signed by both parties.

141
Item 11.

8 13.02 CONTRACTOR shall not assign or otherwise transfer any rights or interest in this Agreement without the prior written consent of CITY. Unless specifically stated to the contrary in any written consent to an assignment, no assignment will release or discharge the assignor from any duty or responsibility under this Agreement.

13.03 CONTRACTOR shall timely file FPPC Form 700 Conflict of Interest Statements with CITY if required by California law and/or the CITY’s conflict of interest policy.

13.04 If any legal action or proceeding, including an action for declaratory relief, is brought to enforce or interpret the provisions of this Agreement, the prevailing party will be entitled to reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs, in addition to any other relief to which that party may be entitled.

13.05 This Agreement is made, entered into and shall be performed in the County of Riverside in the State of California and shall in all respects be interpreted, enforced and governed under the laws of the State of California.

13.06 CONTRACTOR covenants that neither it nor any officer or principal of its firm has any interest, nor shall they acquire any interest, either directly or indirectly, which will conflict in any manner or degree with the performance of their Services hereunder. CONTRACTOR further covenants that in the performance of this Agreement, no person having such interest shall be employed by it as an officer, employee, agent, or subcontractor.

13.07 CONTRACTOR has read and is aware of the provisions of Section 1090 et seq. and Section 87100 et seq. of the Government Code relating to conflict s of interest of public officers and employees. CONTRACTOR agrees that they are unaware of any financial or economic interest of any public officer or employee of the CITY relating to this Agreement. It is further understood and agreed that if such a financial interest does exist at the inception of this Agreement, the C ITY may immediately terminate this Agreement by giving notice thereof. CONTRACTOR shall comply with the requirements of Government Code section 87100 et seq. and section 1090 in the performance of and during the term of this Agreement.

13.08 Improper Consideration. CONTRACTOR shall not offer (either directly or through an intermediary) any improper consideration such as, but not limited to, cash, discounts, services, the provision of travel or entertainment, or any items of value to any officer, employee or agent of the CITY in an attempt to secure favorable treatment regarding this Agreement or any contract awarded by CITY. The CITY, by notice, may immediately terminate this Agreement if it determines that any improper consideration as described in the preceding sentence was offered to any officer, employee or agent of the CITY with respect to the proposal and award process of this Agreement or any CITY contract. This prohibition shall apply to any amendment, extension or evaluation process once this Agreement or any C ITY contract has been awarded. CONTRACTOR shall immediately report any attempt by any C ITY officer, employee or agent to solicit (either directly or through an intermediary) improper consideration from CONTRACTOR.

142
Item 11.

9 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereby have made and executed this Agreement to be effective as of the day and year first above-written.

CITY:

CITY OF BEAUMONT

By: ________________________________
Lloyd White, Mayor
CONTRACTOR:

________________________________

By: ______________________________

Print Name: _______________________

Title: _____________________________

143
Item 11.

EXHIBIT “A”

PROPOSAL

144
Item 11.

145
Item 11.

146
Item 11.

Section A. Cover Letter ................................................................1 Section B. Introduction/Information .............................................3 Section C. Approach ....................................................................7 Section D. Firm Profile ................................................................10 Section E. Location ....................................................................11 Section F. Organization, Key Personnel, and Resumes .............11 Section G. Project Experiences ..................................................13 Section H. References ................................................................14 Section I. Scope of Services ......................................................15 Section J. Cost Proposal ............................................................20 Section K. Additional Information ...............................................20 Section L. Insurance/ Certification .............................................20 Appendix A. Project Team Resumes ..........................................A1 Appendix B. Detailed Project Experience ..................................B1 Appendix C. CEQA Technical Study Detailed Scopes of Work ..C1 Appendix D. Project Schedule ...................................................D1 Table of Contents
147
Item 11.

148
Item 11.

1 Section A. Cover Letter
Corporate Headquarters
3788 McCray Street
Riverside, CA 92506
T: 951.686.1070
Murrieta Office
41870 Kalmia Street #160
Murrieta, CA 92562
T: 951.686.1070
January 10, 2022
Dustin Christensen, PE
Public Works Department
City of Beaumont
550 E. 6th Street
Beaumont, CA 92223
RE: Request for Proposal for Professional Engineering Services for Beaumont Mesa Lift Station and Force Main Project
Dear Mr. Christensen:

Enclosed is Albert A. Webb Associates (WEBB) proposal to provide engineering services for the Beaumont Mesa Lift Station and Force Main Project for the City of Beaumont (City). The City needs a trusted and experienced technical team to manage and lead this project.

The WEBB Team fully
understands that the Beaumont
Mesa Lift Station and force main
is a critical component of the
City’s overall sewage collection
system and that this lift station
needs a high level of reliability
and redundancy to prevent
sanitary sewer overflows.

WEBB’s proposal delves into the critical project issues providing the City a clear path to meeting project objectives, illustrates our approach, and lays out a detailed scope of work to successfully complete the project.

Below are some specific valuable characteristics this WEBB Team delivers to this project:

Detailed Project Experience and Expertise: Our team has very specific and detailed experience with this project that will be invaluable to the City. We performed an initial evaluation of the Mesa Lift Station as part of a sewer study completed for Calimesa. We have also been working on PLC and SCADA upgrades and this and other City lift stations. Our experience designing and overseeing construction of the City’s Brineline along a significant portion of the alignment allows our team to jump start this project.

In selecting the WEBB Team, you will
have a trusted local partner with the
technical experience in lift station
design and assessment to efficiently
develop the right approach for the
lift station and force main alignment
upgrade options.
www.webbassociates.com 149
Item 11.

2 Brief Project Understanding and Approach: WEBB has reviewed the scope of work, documents provided, visited the site and understands the critical nature of this facility. The Mesa Lift Station and Force Main are critically important because they handle all of the sewer flows north of the 60 Freeway and west of the Interstate 10. The current facilities lack sufficient redundancy and storage and must operate nearly perfectly to avoid sewer backups and overflows. During certain high flow conditions, the Mesa Lift Station has less than 30 minutes of storage volume, which creates a very precarious situation for the City’s Operations Staff.

A key element of our project approach is to work closely with City Staff in determining the best approach for the lift station modifications, additional storage, and the best alignment for the force main considering available right-of-way and Caltrans permitting requirements.

Experienced Team: Our core team has the experience on similar sized facilities under similar requirements. The WEBB team is intimately aware of the current issues at the lift station and the challenges for the alignment based on our recent experience with several recent City projects.

We will need little time to get up to speed on the intricacies of this project. We understand how to unravel and investigate older facilities, and we understand how to reduce risks and challenges on just this type of project.

Efficient: The same team has worked together seamlessly and has similar experience. With our knowledge of the current status, we avoid unnecessary tasks and quickly assess the lift station condition and force main alignment options. We will work together to eliminate unnecessary tasks.

In addition, our team has experience with equipment procurement strategies and construction delivery alternatives to achieve the best product at the best price.

Commitment: The City will benefit from a team committed to identifying the best alternatives, developing the preliminary designs, and determining the most efficient procurement and implementation strategy for the best value. Our team is capable of launching straight into this project, will be responsive to your requests, and will provide expedited completion.

On behalf of our entire project team, I would like to thank the City for this opportunity to submit our proposal for this very important project. We look forward to discussing our team, our scope, and ideas with you in greater detail.

Our team members will remain available throughout the duration of the project. As a result, you can be confident your sewer system improvements will be successfully completed in a timely and professional manner. We look forward to the opportunity to continue working together. If you have any questions regarding our proposal, please contact me directly at 951.830.3389, or by email at [email protected].

Our Cost Proposal has been submitted separate from this proposal per the City’s request.

WEBB acknowledges the receipt of Addendum 1.

Sincerely,
Brian Knoll, PE - Chief Operations Officer
Work Phone: 951.248.4279
Mobile Phone: 951.830.3389
[email protected]
150
Item 11.

3 Section B. Introduction/Information
Project Understanding
The City of Beaumont (City) is requesting a proposal for the preparation of designs of upgrades for the Beaumont Mesa Lift Station with new pumps, flow meters, piping and additional wet well volume for additional emergency storage and a new 16-in diameter force main along Potrero Blvd and Western Knolls Avenue. The City’s goal is to install this critical infrastructure to meet the current and near- term needs of the City’s sewer collection system. According to the addendum, the realignment of the existing 12-in diameter force main has already been designed to 95% and will be differed until the Western Knolls Avenue is realigned.

The City service area covers approximately 26 square miles of the western portion of Riverside County bound by Calimesa, Cherry Valley, San Jacinto, and Banning. Wastewater generated in the City’s service area is collected and conveyed to the treatment facilities. The City’s sewer system consists of approximately 175 miles of gravity sewer pipelines, 20 miles of sewer force main pipelines, and nine active lift stations. The Beaumont Mesa Lift Station and Force Main were constructed in 2008 to convey wastewater from the northwest side of the City to the WWTP. Based on the data provided, it has been confirmed that an active 12-inch diameter force main crosses State Highway 60 along its alignment to the WWTP and there is a 16-in diameter force main paralleling a portion of this alignment along Western Knolls Avenue, under the 60 Fwy and then to the WWTP.

Legal Name: Albert A. Webb Associates
Legal Form of Company: Corporation
Representative: Brian Knoll, PE
Chief Operations Officer
3788 McCray Street
Riverside, CA 92506
951.248.4279
California Business License Number:

C0262218
Department of Industrial Relations (DIR):
1000006209
Above Grade Piping at Beaumont Mesa LS
151
Item 11.

WEBB assisted the City with their Wastewater Treatment Plant Expansion and Brine Line planning, design, environmental clearances, permitting and construction and is familiar with the City’s wastewater system and facilities. Specifically, our experience with the brine line alignment selection between the Beaumont Mesa Lift Station and the Wastewater Treatment Plant will be invaluable for the design of the proposed force main alignment.

Previously, WEBB has completed the Country Village Wastewater Capacity Study that reviewed upstream development, ultimately a tributary area to the Beaumont Mesa Lift Station and identified preliminary evaluation and data requirements for the lift station. WEBB understands how important this facility is to the City’s collection system and that the lift station reliability and emergency storage are critical to prevent major sanitary sewer overflows. During high flow conditions, the Mesa Lift Station has less than 30 minutes of storage, thus creating a very precarious situation for the City’s Operations Staff.

For the environmental clearance, most of the proposed alignment of the 16-inch force main was evaluated as part of the preferred alignment for the Brine Pipeline, which was analyzed in the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Beaumont Wastewater Treatment Plant Upgrade/Expansion and Brine Pipeline. The Beaumont City Council adopted the mitigated negative declaration and approved the project on March 20, 2018.

For addenda to existing CEQA documents, the following state guidelines apply:

State CEQA Guidelines Section 15164(b) states:
“An addendum to an adopted negative declaration may be prepared if only minor technical changes or additions are necessary or none of the conditions described in Section 15162 calling for the preparation of a subsequent EIR or negative declaration have occurred.” An addendum would avoid the requirement for the AB 52 consultation and potential delays from this process.

Management Philosophy
WEBB understands the absolute need for strong project management. Our team will factor in all critical issues associated with schedules. Communication and coordination between an engineering consultant and the City is paramount to each project. To guarantee continuous and effective communication, Brad Sackett, our project manager is assigned to serve as the primary point of contact to the City and Brian Knoll, our principal-in-charge will be monitoring the process as a whole. This will ensure a constant and effective way of communication resulting in strong schedule control and meeting design milestones.

WEBB’s project manager will be responsible for the day-to-day project and technical management of the project including:
• Facilitating frequent and consistent communications with the City • Implementing the overall delivery plan
• Managing the overall scope, schedule, and budget
• Implementing the QA/QC Program
• Weekly e-mail updates and monthly status reports on progress The project manager will be responsible for facilitating final decisions by the City, coordination, management, communicating with the project team and the City Project Manager, and preparing and reviewing design deliverables.
4 152
Item 11.

5 Brad Sackett led the design of the City’s Brineline and will lead the force main design.

Shane Bloomfield will take the role of project engineer for the lift station evaluation and design work and will be supported by Dave Algranti, our chief design engineer, SKM, will lead electrical and SCADA design, our design sub-consultant and Klienfelder will lead structural design. This is the same team that worked together on the City’s Wastewater Treatment Plant Upgrade project.

Schedule Management
A preliminary schedule has been prepared and included in the proposal. In collaboration with the City, the project schedule and milestones will be evaluated and modifications will be made to set the final baseline schedule during the initial project kick-off process. The baseline schedule will be monitored and tracked by our project manager to maintain the project milestones and manage critical path items. A tracking schedule will be provided with monthly updates and all schedule variances identified. Actions required to correct schedule deviations will be developed and implemented by the team. The project schedule is an effective management tool when developed and maintained to guide the design team through the tasks required to successfully complete a project. WEBB uses Microsoft Project software to schedule and track project tasks.

Key components of maintaining the project schedule revolve around the following actions between the WEBB team and the City:

1. Close coordination with the City Project Manager.

2. Effectively and thoroughly addressing City comments and concerns throughout this project.

3. Early coordination and follow up with SCE if a new electrical service is needed.

4. Early coordination and follow up with Caltrans for the parallel encroachment permit application.

WEBB will perform initial coordination with the agencies which establishes the basis for completion of these items through the preliminary and final design phases. The project manager continually reviews the project schedule, project budget, and work completed to date. The project manager will then discuss the results of this review with the City and provide updates every week. If necessary, corrective measures will be implemented and the project schedule updated.

Cost/Budget Management Plan
The proposed project budget will be prepared based on the project RFP requirements. Our project manager will track the final budget compared to the tasks completed and costs-to-date, and will identify any project cost variance at least monthly. Corrective actions will be taken to maintain the project budget. If changes to the scope and budget are deemed necessary, our project manager will work with the City to justify the need and clearly define the impacts.

Issue Management/Risk Management
The tracking of project issues and management of risks is facilitated through a tracking log and available to the City and the project team. With issues being raised through e-mail, phone calls, and meetings throughout the duration of the project, having a centralized document ensures project impacts are identified, logged, assigned, analyzed, acted upon, and addressed as part of the design process.

Communication Plan and Management
Communication between all team members and City Staff is critical to its success. A key differentiator between our project team and our competitors is our physical locations and our ability to meet with City Staff and stakeholders quickly. Whether it is City Council meetings, a community workshop, or a strategy meeting with the City, representatives from the Project Team can be there within 30 minutes.

We also have full access through Microsoft Teams to facilitate meetings in a timely and cost effective manner.
153
Item 11.

6 CURTAIL ERRORS & OMMISSIONS
QA/QC Process

CURTAIL ERRORS & OMMISSIONS
QA/QC Process
Quality Management
WEBB has established an extensive in-house Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) Program that all project managers must conform to for all of our projects. This program is overseen by our chief operations officer, who continually monitors compliance with our in-house QA/QC Program.

Our team utilizes WEBB’s detailed approach to quality assurance and quality control. It demands our principal leaders rigorously scrutinize every critical aspect of a project. Our quality assurance begins with developing a close and continuous line of communication between the WEBB Team and the City. Our past experience indicates good communication is a critical element to project success.

Under our project protocol, we keep an organized directory of all project-related communication, meeting minutes and action items, documents, images, data, and plan sets which allows us to respond quickly to requests. We will seek the input of operations and engineering staff throughout the project development to ensure the project meets the needs of the client.

The quality control for all projects is embedded in every stage of the project development. Our QA/QC Program is designed to enhance the cooperation and synergy between the disciplines in- house, our design teams, subconsultants, and the City. Our entire staff is part of the QA/QC Program and each plays a significant role in its implementation. As an underlying principle of our QA/QC Program, WEBB will utilize senior level staff to review the work product to utilize the experience and knowledge to each aspect of the project. By bringing these disciplines together early in the project, we are able to recommend the best project alternative and develop a list of critical design issues that need to be addressed as detailed design is implemented.

After the preliminary design has been developed, the project will receive a comprehensive internal peer review prior to submittal. The peer review panel consists of WEBB professionals apart from the design team. This peer review will be utilized to ensure the preliminary design is clear, concise, comprehensive, and most importantly, meets the objectives of the City. Final approval at 100% is achieved only after the associate responsible for each portion of the project signs off on our internal QA/QC approved document, known as the “Zero Sheet”, prior to submittal to the City. 154
Item 11.

7 Section C. Approach
Based on review of available plans for the force mains, the design intent appears to be for both the 12-inch and 16-inch force mains to convey the ultimate flows to the WWTP. There were several places that the force mains would be inter-tied for redundancy and future maintenance purposes.

WEBB will confirm the exact end point of the existing 16-inch diameter force main along Western Knolls Avenue and confirm what other proposed appurtenances were previously constructed by on-site inspection and potholing. WEBB will also confirm whether the existing 16-in diameter force main is currently active and the configuration of all existing force main appurtenances and vaults to ensure they are suitable for the proposed 16-in diameter force main.

The Beaumont Mesa Lift Station receives flow from multiple lift stations and then pumps this sewage to the WWTP. Based on previous discussions with the City, none of the available as-built plans accurately reflect the existing condition of the lift station. As part of the wastewater master plan, Akel and Cannon prepared some updated as-built drawings. WEBB’s first task will be to thoroughly review those as-built drawings and other available data as part of our on-site verification of existing facilities. WEBB will supplement this information to document the existing condition such that there is a definitive set of as-builts to be used as the basis of the redesign work.

The WEBB team will then assess each of the lift station components; (wet well, emergency storage, pumps, valves, piping, electrical, emergency genset, SCADA, electrical service connection, site paving and access, etc.), determine the ultimate pump sizes/HP’s and make recommendations for the ultimate facility and appropriate phasing for this work. WEBB will review the operating points of the existing multiple low flow and one high flow pumps currently installed and compare against the system head curves for the 12-in force main, the 16-in force-main operating both together and separately. Operating outside the recommended pump curve may be the cause of wear and tear on the pumps. If a new SCE service connection is required, the application will be submitted to SCE as quickly as possible to minimize the impact to the project schedule. The WEBB team will also develop a carefully thought out cut over plan for the electrical service to essentially eliminate or minimize any service interruptions for this critical facility.

Our team includes SKM, Inc. who is familiar with the electrical systems and SCADA operation systems of the City’s multitude of lift stations and is currently working on some interim upgrades to the existing lift station’s electrical and SCADA system.

It is understood that the emergency storage volume at the lift station is to be expanded to provide additional emergency storage. WEBB will review the findings of the previous work in the master plan and confirm with the City which approach will be implemented. WEBB has included Kleinfelder on our team to prepare the necessary structural design/details for the additional emergency storage.

Currently, the area fronting the lift station is unimproved. WEBB will propose an access driveway to the existing pavement in Potrero Blvd. WEBB also has landscape architects on staff who can propose low maintenance improvements to area around the lift station owned by the City to screen the lift station and minimize maintenance costs. Ultimately, the City may want the lift station to blend into the surrounding development.

The City could condition future development to appropriately landscape around the lift station consistent with their future landscaping scheme.
155
Item 11.

8 This project will design a parallel 16-in force
main approximately 6,200 lf from the Beaumont
Mesa Lift Station along Potrero Blvd and
Western Knolls Avenue to the connection point
near the front of an existing mini storage facility.

This location is based on the available plans for
the force mains. WEBB will leverage its previous
work on the brine line design for this project.

WEBB has identified some key issues along this
alignment, confirming the connection point to
the existing 16-in force main on Western Knolls,
confirming the location/configuration of any of
the existing appurtenances along this alignment,
confirming the location of the existing 12-in
force main, and permitting the proposed 16-in
force main within Caltrans jurisdiction. There are
some major regional gas and petroleum lines
within this alignment which will be identified as
part of the utility research. WEBB will coordinate
with these major utilities for both potholing and
construction plans.

Based on review of available plans for the force
mains, the design intent appears to be for both the
12-in and 16-in force mains to convey the ultimate
flows to the WWTP. There were several places that
the force mains could be intertied for redundancy
and future maintenance purposes, consistent
with the original design concept. WEBB has the
original construction plans for the force mains and
will confirm the exact end point of the existing 16-in diameter force main along Western Knolls Avenue and confirm what other proposed appurtenances were previously constructed by on-site inspection, utility locating and potholing. It will also be confirmed whether the existing 16-in diameter force main is currently active, however, it is anticipated that the 16-in diameter force main is not currently active.

WEBB will be able to use previous data developed for the brine line associated with surveying, mapping, potholing, and geotechnical investigation for this project. WEBB will only have to supplement this work for this proposed project, saving the City time and money on these tasks. Updated aerial will be inserted into the existing mapping files as recent improvements along Potrero Blvd need to be included. Some additional potholing will also be completed by the team.

WEBB’s approach to environmental compliance for the proposed 16-inch force main and improvements at the Mesa Lift Station is to prepare an Addendum to the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Beaumont Wastewater Treatment Plant Upgrade/Expansion and Brine Pipeline. Most of the proposed alignment of the 16-inch force main was evaluated as part of the preferred alignment for the Brine Pipeline, which was analyzed in the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Beaumont Wastewater Treatment Plant Upgrade/Expansion and Brine Pipeline (WTP MND), which was adopted March 2018. Although the RFP provides the Caltrans CEQA/ NEPA document for their State Route 60 Project, we believe, the Proposed Project fits best using the city’s MND as the foundational CEQA document for the Proposed Project. We propose to provide Location of 12 and 16 in diameter force mains prior to
crossing the 60 Fwy
(Left) Marker for Questar 16-in pipeline along the
realignment of Western Knolls Avenue
(Right) Existing Force Main appurtenance along
Western Knolls Avenue
156
Item 11.

9 an Addendum pursuant to section 15164 of the
CEQA Guidelines to the City’s WTP MND. The
benefit of the Addendum is that no Public Review
period is needed, and AB 52 Tribal Consultation
is not triggered, thereby saving the City time and
money. Updated technical studies for air quality/
greenhouse gas emissions, biological resources,
and cultural resources will be prepared as further
described in our scope of services in Task 4.1
and Task 4.2 of this proposal.

Communication will be key in the early stages of
this project as the investigations proceed, the alternatives are analyzed, and results are documented in the technical memorandum. WEBB proposes that key personnel from the City and the WEBB team are included in weekly coordination meetings to keep the investigation process on track and obtain input from City Staff. In our technical memorandum, WEBB will outline the opportunities and challenges for the project in terms of CEQA documentation, jurisdictional delineations, regulatory permits, encroachment permits, any right-of-way or easement requirements, existing force mains, lift station upgrades and emergency storage expansion and summarize our recommendations for the final design phase.

WEBB has assembled a design team very familiar with the project, the area and these types of projects.

Brad Sackett, PE will be the overall project manager leveraging his experience with the planning, design, and construction support of the brine line. Brad will also take the lead on the force main alignment selection and design aspects of the project. Brad will be supported by Brian Knoll, PE as our principal in charge. Brian was intimately involved in the WWTP upgrades and brine line project as overall program manager for these two projects.

For the lift station, Shane Bloomfield, PE will head up the evaluation and design efforts. Shane was the lead engineer on the civil design for the WWTP project and has over 20 years of experience with pump station and lift station design. Shane will be supported by Dave Algranti, PE, WEBB’s Chief Design Engineer, with over 40 years of experience on pump station and lift station design.

Cheryl DeGano will lead up the environmental documentation for the project. Cheryl was the lead environmental analyst for the brine line CEQA documentation, and she will leverage her knowledge and experience from that work. Cheryl will be supported by Stephanie Standerfer, WEBB’s environmental department director. Autumn DeWoody will track the permitting on the project, again leveraging her area-specific knowledge from the permitting for the brine line project. WEBB’s same survey team will prepare the mapping and topography, building on the mapping already completed for the brine line project.

Mark Jeppsen from SKM, Inc. will be the lead electrical engineer and will build on his specific experience with on-going interim improvements at the Beaumont Mesa Lift Station and his experience with the City’s WWTP work. SKM also provided electrical design and SCADA programming for the WWTP Upgrade Project and has extensive experience with the City’s facilities, standards and operating procedures. Converse Consultants will provide the geotechnical investigation, leveraging their specific work on geotechnical work for the brine line project. Kleinfelder will provide the structural design of the emergency storage and wet well expansions, similar to their work on the WWTP upgrades and the brineline vault structures.

C-Below will provide potholing services, similar to those provided as part of the brine line project.

Overall, this team has worked together on many projects and specifically for the City’s Brine Line and WWTP projects and is committed to successfully completing these upgrades to the City’s critical sewer collection system infrastructure in a timely and professional manner.

Appurtenances for ex. 12-in Force Main
along Potrero Blvd
157
Item 11.

158
Item 11.

10 Section D. Firm Profile
Albert A. Webb Associates (WEBB), a Corporation, has consistently provided civil engineering services to public sector clients throughout California since 1945. This means our clients receive the benefit of a financially stable firm that has withstood many diverse economic times. WEBB is a mid-size consulting firm with offices in Riverside and Murrieta to best meet the needs of all of our clients. WEBB has over 165 associates and the in-house expertise to address the needs of cities, water and special districts, counties, regional agencies, and our partner firms within the industry. WEBB offers a broad range of services to meet the objectives of our clients which include project development, planning, design, entitlement, funding, permitting, construction management, and inspection.

Service Departments Owner and Principal Parties
Firm Specifics
• Water Resources
• Construction Management and
Inspection
• Land Development Engineering
• Traffic and Transportation Engineering
• Planning and Environmental
• Land Survey and Mapping Services
• Landscape Architecture
• Geographic Information Systems
• Matthew Webb, PE, TE, LS - President/CEO
• Scott Webb - Senior Vice President
• Steve Webb - Director of Risk Management
• Brian Knoll, PE - Chief Operations Officer
• Kevin W.M. Ferguson - Chief Development Officer
• Todd Smith - Chief Financial Officer
• Sam Gershon, RCE - Senior Vice President
• Scott Hildebrandt, PE - Senior Vice President
• Bruce Davis, PE - Senior Vice President
• Dilesh Sheth, PE, TE - Senior Vice President
• Stephanie Standerfer - Vice President
• Jason Ardery, PE, TE, LLS, CPESC, QSD - Vice
President
• Joseph Caldwell, PE, CPESC, CPSWQ, QSD, QSP,
CFM - Director
• Emily Webb, J.D. - Senior Land Use and Entitlement
Specialist
1945 165 53
Founding Year Number of Employees Professional Licenses Corporate Headquarters:
3788 McCray Street
Riverside, CA 92506
951.686.1070
Palm Desert Office:
74967 Sheryl Avenue
Palm Desert, CA 92260
T: 951.686.1070
Murrieta:
41870 Kalmia Street #160
Murrieta, CA 92562
951.686.1070
159
Item 11.

160
Item 11.

Section F. Organization, Key Personnel, and Resumes
Brad will serve as Project Manager and will be the City’s primary point-of-contact for the project. Brad will act as an extension of the City to ensure a successful outcome of this project from beginning to end. This will include a strict adherence to the project schedules and QA/QC standards that will be developed and maintained at the project’s onset. Brad will be supported by a highly qualified project team with experience on similar well projects. The experience of this team will improve overall project management and provide very effective and efficient services.

Our assigned project team consists of senior level professionals who will perform the required tasks for the City. By taking this hands-on approach, an experienced professional always has in-depth and intimate knowledge of each project task. This improves overall project management, reduces the opportunity for costly mistakes and delays, and allows our staff to provide very effective and efficient service to you. Coordination is critical for your project. Every project assigned to WEBB includes principal involvement.

Brad will be the lead on the force main for this project and will supported by our Key Project Engineers, Shane Bloomfield, PE and David Algranti, PE. Shane and Dave will assist with key components of the lift station as they have worked on multiple lift station projects. WEBB’s Principal Environmental Analyst, Cheryl Degano, will lead the environmental documentation for this project. Our team members are readily available to you and remain accessible throughout the project to the extent required to successfully complete it.

We have also fortified our project team with our specialty subconsultants - SKM, Inc. will provide electrical engineering services, C Below will provide potholing services, Converse Consultants will provide geotechnical engineering services, and Kleinfelder will provide structural design services.

These subconsultants have worked with the WEBB Team on a variety of water and sewer infrastructure projects throughout Inland Southern California.

Detailed resumes for key WEBB project team members can be found in Appendix A. • Twenty-one years of pertinent experience with WEBB
• Project Manager for the City’s Brineline project
• Extensive experience on water and sewer system design and implementation • Strong technical background on lift station design
• Long-standing relationship with our subconsultants
Project Manager Highlights
Bradley A. Sackett, PE
Senior Engineer
11 Section E. Location
Office Location: 3788 McCray Street, Riverside, CA 92506 Phone Number: 951.686.1070
161
Item 11.

We have assembled a project team of highly experienced engineering and technical personnel with extensive experience in lift station design and lift station condition assessment.

Organizational Chart
Brian Knoll, PE
Chief Operations Officer
Principal-in-Charge
C 65690
Experience: 20 Years
Bradley Sackett, PE
Senior Engineer
Project Manager
C 65862
Experience: 21 Years
Dave Algranti, PE
Chief Design Engineer
Technical Advisor
C 26817
Experience: 46 Years
Shane Bloomfield, PE
Senior Engineer
Project Engineer
C 77435
Experience: 19 Years
Stephanie Standerfer
Vice President
CEQA Manager
Experience: 22 Years
Cheryl DeGano
Principal Environmental Analyst
CEQA Analysis
Experience: 17 Years
Autumn DeWoody
Senior Environmental Analyst
Water Audit Validator
Experience: 19 Years
Electrical
Engineering
SKM Inc.

Geotechnical
Engineering
Converse
Consultants
Structural
Design
Kleinfelder
Potholing
Services
C-Below
Biological
Resources
Wood
Cultural
Resources
Æ, Inc.

LEADERSHIP

PROJECT ENGINEERS

ENVIRONMENTAL TEAM

SUBCONSULTANTS
12 162
Item 11.

13 Section G. Project Experience
For detailed project experience, please refer to Addendum 2.

Gateway of the Americas, Sewer Lift Station No. 2
County of Imperial - Public Works
• Replacement of two 5-hp submersible sewage pumping units • Wet Well Dry Pit
• New 740 GPM pumping units, new control building
Client Contact: John Gay, 442.265.1836, [email protected] “B” Street Lift Station Upgrades
City of Imperial
• This project constructed a dry pit adjacent to the existing wet well with new non- clog Gorman-Rupp sewage pumps
• Project included oxygenation equipment to reduce odors, new shade structures, and upgraded electrical systems
Client Contact: Jackie Loper, 760.355.1152, [email protected] Regional Lift Station Improvements
Jurupa Community Services District
• Facility is a wet well dry pit design with an ultimate capacity of 4,500 GPM • Involved with all aspects of planning, phasing, design, and construction of facilities • Approx. 3.5 miles of 24-inch dia. PVC pipeline through existing developed streets Client Contact: Eddie Rhee, 951.685.7434 x 118, [email protected] River Road Lift Station
Golden State Water Company
• 60-inch diameter jacked and bore casing for 42-inch HDPE influent pipeline • 35-FT deep pre-cast manhole with sluice gate for emergency shutoff • 35-FT deep diversion structure to direct flows to any of the three wet well cells Client Contact: Eddie Rhee, 951.685.7434 x 118, [email protected] Sewer Bond Projects (Partial List)
Jurupa Community Services District
• Florine Sewer Lift Station - 3,500 LF 10-inch diameter Gravity Main and Force Main • Regional Sewer Lift Station – 7,500 GPM, 750 HP Capacity • Force Main and 2,200 LF of 27-inch diameter Gravity Sewer Client Contact: Eddie Rhee, 951.685.7434 x 118, [email protected] Clay Street Lift Station Replacement
Jurupa Community Services District
• New 700 GPM, 25 hp pumping units w/ a 100 kw standby generator @ Linares LS • New 18-inch diameter regional force main segment within Clay Street • New 8-inch diameter gravity sewers within Clay Street and General Drive • Two new 12-inch diameter waterlines within Clay Street Client Contact: Eddie Rhee, 951.685.7434 x 118, [email protected] 163
Item 11.

164
Item 11.

14 Section H. References
The City will benefit from WEBB’s approach to client service. Client service is our number one goal.

WEBB’s reputation for superior quality work, integrity, and long-standing client relationships is a direct result of our industry proven capabilities and experience. We are proud of the name WEBB as it has become synonymous with quality experience and customer service. We encourage the City to speak with your staff who have worked with our firm or to call upon our references to truly understand the commitment we all make to each of our clients and their projects.

Contact Person/Title
Eddie Rhee, PE
Engineering Manager
Jurupa Community Services District
11201 Harrel Street
Jurupa Valley, CA 91752-3715
951.685.7434 x118
[email protected]
Agency Contact Information
Jackie Loper
Director of Community Development
City of Imperial
420 South Imperial Avenue
Imperial, California 92251
760.355.3336
[email protected]
Jeff Sims
General Manager
Rubidoux Community Services District
3590 Rubidoux Boulevard
Riverside, CA, 92509-4525
951.684.7580
[email protected]
Sambo Lay
Civil Engineer
Eastern Municipal Water District
2270 Trumble Road
Perris, CA 92572-8300
951.928.3777
[email protected]
John Gay
Deputy Director of Public Works
County of Imperial - Public Works
155 South 11th Street
El Centro, CA 92243-2803
442.265.1836
[email protected]
165
Item 11.

166
Item 11.

15 Section I. Scope of Services
Task 1 - Project Management
Kick-Off Meeting – WEBB will organize and conduct a project kick-off meeting with the City upon receipt of notice to proceed. The meeting will focus on confirmation of the scope of work, schedule, identify key interface points with the City, methods for communication, points-of-contact, standards and design preferences, permitting requirements, and a review of concepts to refine site layout. In addition, WEBB will review critical path items such as site acquisition and finalize our approach in close coordination with City Staff. WEBB will provide the City with a draft agenda prior to the meeting and distribute meeting minutes summarizing results of topics discussed and action items.

Electronic Project Schedule – WEBB will prepare a baseline schedule, update the schedule monthly, and submit the updates on a monthly basis for City use, review, and comment. The schedule will include all submittals and any required coordination with City staff.

Weekly Project Status Updates – WEBB will provide the City project manager with a brief weekly update summarizing the progress made on the project, as well as any schedule or budget issues.

If project issues require discussion, WEBB will coordinate a conference call/meeting with the City’s project manager to ensure the project issues are clearly communicated and resolved.

Monthly Coordination/Progress Meetings – WEBB will organize project meetings or conference calls with the City’s project manager. During the first phases of the project, the meetings are intended to be every two weeks to maintain focus on the investigation. Once the project gets into the design phase, the meetings will be monthly. The meetings will focus on project status, action items, schedule, and budget. WEBB will provide the City with a draft agenda prior to the meeting and distribute meeting minutes summarizing results of topics discussed and action item updates. The meeting minutes will serve as the monthly report to the City and will be submitted as one hard copy and one electronic copy (pdf). Any out of-scope items will be clearly identified to the City and WEBB will seek approval prior to proceeding.

Design Workshops – WEBB will conduct presentations to City Staff at the end of each major task.

This will be at the Preliminary Design phase, the 60% design and 90% design to discuss the project details, construction schedule, costs, and constraints, and receive feedback from City Staff on the design approach and follow up on previous comments. The 60% and 90% will include a field walk to confirm site conditions are consistent with the design approach.

Quality Assurance/Quality Control – WEBB will develop a quality assurance and quality control program for the project. WEBB uses a checklist approach for pipelines and lift stations based on our experience with design for other agencies. Other documents and design calculations will be reviewed and signed off by senior staff prior to submittal. The program will include constructability and operational reviews by both WEBB and City staff.

Coordination With Other Agencies – WEBB will coordinate any required meetings with the City and other agencies. For this project, this effort is anticipated to be focused on the Caltrans if an encroachment permit is required. We do not anticipate permits from Riverside County Flood Control as this drainage is improved and not within facilities that RCFC maintains. Other agency coordination WEBB acknowledges the Scope of Work in the RFP and has summarized our proposed scope below.
167
Item 11.

will be SCE for an electrical service plan. On the Environmental side, resource agencies such as Cal Department of Wildlife may be involved depending upon the findings of the jurisdictional delineation and the project footprint. Typically, coordination with other agencies such as existing utilities, South Coast Air Quality Management City, or Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation City can be handled with direct correspondence, emails, or telephone conferences. The City’s project manager will be included on all communication to ensure the City is fully aware of any issues.

Task 2 - Data Gathering and Analysis
Data Gathering – WEBB will assemble all pertinent data related to the project including the WWMP, the hydraulic model, current operational data, and other related drawings and mapping from the brine line project and Caltrans recent Potrero Bridge project. WEBB will confirm critical pipeline sizes and lengths for the force main, and elevation data related to the proposed force main alignment options. WEBB will check critical parameters within the hydraulic model for accuracy and compare against existing operating set points.

Field Visits, Inquiries, and Investigations – WEBB will conduct at least one field visit to confirm parameters related to the alignment selection process. Our mapping at this stage will be based on the previously prepared mapping for the brine line, available GIS information and our field visit. We will review the alignments for potential biological and jurisdictional issues. Converse Consultants will conduct a desktop geotechnical review from published reports and available aerial data. Webb will conduct a thorough review of the lift station site, as built plans and existing mechanical and electrical equipment.

Independent Review and Analysis –WEBB will conduct a review of the Akel’s recommendations from the WWMP as it relates to the lift station, any implications for facilities such as the emergency storage capacity. Any alternatives will be identified in this preliminary design phase. This review will include the environmental documents associated with previous projects.

Environmental Concerns - As part of this task, WEBB, Wood Environment and Infrastructure Solutions (Wood), and Applied Earthworks (Æ) will assist the engineering team with potential environmental concerns (i.e., environmental constraints). The identified environmental concerns and a discussion of any jurisdictional features and needed permits will be documented in the Technical Memorandum.

Workshop and Deliverables – WEBB will conduct a workshop with City Staff with our findings. A technical memorandum will be prepared with all recommendations and findings.

Task 3 - Investigations
Task 3.1 Surveying and Utility Potholing – WEBB will self-perform field survey services to provide complete topographical survey and mapping of the selected alignment rights-of-way with 1-FT contours, supplementing the previously prepare brine line mapping. Field topography with more accuracy will be done as needed for the lift station design, design of any street or drainage improvements and where recent improvements have been implemented. The mapping will identify all existing easements, assessor parcel numbers, and existing utilities on or adjacent to the proposed sites or alignments using NAD83 coordinates and NAVD88 county benchmarks.

Any required easements, right-of-way, encroachment permits, or temporary construction easements will be considered and documented for the pipeline alignment selection and alternative analysis.

Potholing – WEBB will prepare a pothole plan for the recommended potholes, coordinate with our sub-consultant, C-Below, to perform the actual potholing, and collect survey data of each pothole. 16 168
Item 11.

17 WEBB will prepare and maintain a pothole list and findings. Our budget includes effort for 10 potholes.

Deliverable: – A complete set of aerial photography and mapping to City Standards in AutoCAD format a potholing plan and potholing report as electronic files on CDs and two hard copies as requested in the RFP.

Task 3.2 Geotechnical Investigation – The geotechnical investigation will build upon the previously prepared report. Two new borings on the lift station site, laboratory testing, geological analysis, regional seismicity review, and preparation of the geotechnical report will be completed by Converse. The geotechnical investigation will include recommendations for excavations, backfill and compaction, seismic parameters, liquefaction, soil corrosivity, and suitability of onsite materials for backfill. The report will include soils parameters and design criteria such as allowable soils bearing, pipe bedding, shoring, dewatering, trench stability and site preparation, and earthwork specifications. We will also use the previous geotechnical report prepared for the brine line for the force main alignment.

Deliverables: Complete geotechnical investigation and corrosion analysis with findings, results, and recommendations.

Task 3.3 - Hydraulic Evaluation and Operational Control Strategy – WEBB will perform hydraulic evaluation for the lift station to confirm required hydraulic design parameters, including additional wetwell storage volume. WEBB will develop anticipated system curves for the proposed lift station for current and ultimate condition. All conditions will be considered including existing and ultimate dry and wet weather flow scenarios. WEBB will use model provided by the City as the basis of this analysis. WEBB has Infowater and Infosewer modeling software. We will also review the station set points, current and future operating conditions, start up and commissioning requirements, required integration programming and SCADA requirements.

WEBB will develop a detailed construction phasing and connection plan that preliminarily lays out the construction phasing and connection sequence of each required improvement to ensure that existing flows are properly handled or bypassed. This will be used as the final design is completed and updated to ensure that the contractor has a clear understanding of the required phasing and the project is constructable without service interruptions.

Deliverables: WEBB will summarize our findings, results, and recommendations into a technical memorandum. Hard copies and one electronic copy (searchable PDF) of the report shall be submitted for review. City comments shall be incorporated and hard copies and one electronic copy (searchable pdf) of the final report shall be submitted.

Task 4 - Environmental Services
WEBB will utilize a CEQA Initial Study Checklist (following Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines) to document whether or not the Proposed Project will have new or different significance determinations as compared to the previously-prepared WTP MND. The intent of the Checklist is to be able to substantiate the findings per CEQA Guidelines §15164 that an Addendum can be supported. The Addendum will be focused only on the alignment for new 16-inch diameter force main and Mesa Lift Station and will determine if new or different impacts will result from what was previously disclosed in the prior CEQA document. The Addendum will include a Clarified Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (CMMRP) that focuses mitigation measures only on potential impacts resulting from construction and operation of the Proposed Project. These measures can then be incorporated into the final construction contract documents 169
Item 11.

18 WEBB will support the City with filing a new Notice of Determination (NOD) once the Addendum is adopted/approved by the City.

The Addendum will be supported by updated air quality/greenhouse gas emissions, biological resources, cultural resources, and paleontological resources analysis and reports as described in Appendix C of this Proposal.

The following assumptions were used in developing the environmental scope of services:
• Project design will not create new or more severe impacts than were previously evaluated in the WTP MND.
• Obtaining an encroachment permit will not require preparation of a new National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) document, NEPA-CEQA revalidation, an Archaeological Survey Report (ASR), Historic Property Survey Report (HPSR), or Paleontological Identification Report (PIR). • No Native American consultation will be required pursuant to AB 52. • Two (2) rounds of revisions to the Addendum are included. • One hard copy and one electronic copy will be provided at the 1st Screencheck and two hard copies and one electronical copy will be provided of the Final Addendum.

Task 5 - Easement Acquisition and Permitting Support (if required) Based on the proposed alignment, a permit for a parallel encroachment from Caltrans is anticipated.

WEBB has recently assisted the City of Victorville acquire a similar parallel encroachment permit along Hwy 18. In addition to the typical permit application, WEBB will prepare a separate justification summary for the parallel encroachment. It is anticipated that the City would commit to constructing new force mains in the future when Western Knolls Avenue is relocated to support a new Hwy 60 interchange at Potrero Blvd. A permit from SCAQMD will be required if the emergency generator is upgraded.

As noted above, an easement may be needed based on the final force main alignment. WEBB will prepare the easement legal description and plat maps and support the City in the acquisition process.

Deliverables: Easement legal and plats, permit applications and final permits Task 6 - SCE Electrical Service Upgrade
SKM will identify if an electrical service upgrade is required and will coordinate with SCE for a service plan for the ultimate facilities. We assume SCE will prepare the service plan and the City will pay all of the applicable fees. SKM will coordinate as early in the process as possible, however, SCE standard practice is not to prepare the service plan until the lift station plan is nearing 90%.

We will work closely with the SCE planner to ensure that the service plan is moving forward.

Deliverables: Approved for construction SCE Service plan.

Task 7 - Final Design and Contract Documents
Prepare civil, mechanical, architectural, electrical, instrumentation, architectural, structural, and landscaping drawings and details for the upgraded lift station and the force mains per the selected alignment. The phasing of the commissioning of the lift station and force main connections will be coordinated with the City and described in the contract documents as the project start-up plan and operational control strategy are refined at each design phase. We do not anticipate significant traffic control impacts and therefore, we anticipate that the contractor will provide traffic control based on a performance specification to 170
Item 11.

19 comply with MUTCD guidelines. WEBB will prepare one set of bid documents, technical specifications, special provisions, and contract documents incorporating all phases of the project. It is anticipated the intermediate milestones will be established based on the phasing and delineation between each project milestone will be specifically identified within the contract documents.

Prepare estimates of probable cost for all three project segments. Cost estimates will be submitted with the 60%, 90%, and 100% submittals and will be refined as the design progresses. 60% and 90% Design Workshops – Conduct two additional workshops with City Staff to update the team on the progress and details of the final design. The design workshop will take place at the 60% plans and 90% plans phase to discuss the City’s comments. A field walk will be conducted in coordination with these workshops. WEBB will provide a draft agenda to the City prior to each meeting and coordinate the presentation materials with the City’s Project Manager. Meeting minutes and action items will be provided to the City’s Project Manager after each workshop.

Deliverables: Sets of plans and specifications per City standards, construction cost estimates, and any required design calculations at 60%, 90%, and 100% submittals in hard copy format and electronic (smart PDF and original formats) as well as final signed mylars and all final documents in hard copy and electronic formats.

Task 8 - Services During Bidding
WEBB will provide services during bidding to include attending and leading the pre-bid walk, providing technical support and prepare timely responses to bidder’s questions as needed, assist the City in reviewing the bid and provide rationale for award if bids are more than 10% higher than the engineer’s estimate.

Deliverables: Draft and final addenda, memorandum if bid amounts are more than 10% higher than anticipated.
171
Item 11.

172
Item 11.

20 Section J. Cost Proposal
In accordance with the RFP, WEBB has provided the cost proposal in a separate sealed envelope.

Section K. Additional Information
No additional information at this time.

Section L. Insurance/Certification
Below is a sample insurance certificate. Upon notification of award, WEBB will provide a furnished COI to the City for the project.

ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVEOFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED?

INSR ADDL SUBRLTRINSD WVD
PRODUCER CONTACTNAME:FAXPHONE(A/C, No):(A/C, No, Ext):

E-MAILADDRESS:

INSURER A :

INSURED INSURER B :

INSURER C :

INSURER D :

INSURER E :

INSURER F :

POLICY NUMBER POLICY EFF POLICY EXPTYPE OF INSURANCE LIMITS(MM/DD/YYYY) (MM/DD/YYYY)

AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY

UMBRELLA LIAB

EXCESS LIAB

WORKERS COMPENSATIONAND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY

AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
EACH OCCURRENCE $
DAMAGE TO RENTEDCLAIMS-MADE OCCUR $PREMISES (Ea occurrence) MED EXP (Any one person) $
PERSONAL & ADV INJURY $
GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER:GENERAL AGGREGATE $

PRO-POLICY LOC PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGGJECT
OTHER:$
COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT $(Ea accident)
ANY AUTO BODILY INJURY (Per person) $OWNED SCHEDULED BODILY INJURY (Per accident) $AUTOS ONLY AUTOS HIRED NON-OWNED PROPERTY DAMAGE $AUTOS ONLY AUTOS ONLY
(Per accident)
$

OCCUR EACH OCCURRENCE
CLAIMS-MADE AGGREGATE $
DED RETENTION $

PER OTH-STATUTE ER
E.L. EACH ACCIDENT
E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE $If yes, describe under E.L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMITDESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below INSURER(S) AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC #

COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY
Y / N
N / A(Mandatory in NH)

SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED INACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS.

THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIODINDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS,EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS.

THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THISCERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZEDREPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER.

IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must have ADDITIONAL INSURED provisions or be endorsed.

If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement onthis certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s).

COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER:REVISION NUMBER:

CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION
© 1988-2015 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved.ACORD 25 (2016/03)

CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE DATE (MM/DD/YYYY)
$
$
$
$
$
The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD

KLAUTERJUNG
Kristie Koehrer
ALBEAWE-01
A
CUP9H48683618
A
BA5456P92918CAG
A
UB4J64817818
A
6305456P929TIL18
B 031711122
1,000,000
1,000,000
1,000,000
0 1,000,000
1,000,000
2,000,000
1,000,000
2,000,000
$0 Deductible 5,000
100,000
1,000,000
1,000,000
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X X
X
X
License # 0757776
02/01/2018 02/01/2021
02/01/2018 02/01/2021
08/08/2018 08/08/2020
09/01/2018 09/01/2020
02/01/2018 02/01/2021
HUB International Insurance Services Inc.PO Box 5345Riverside, CA 92517 (951) 779-8558
Albert A. Webb Associates3788 McCray StreetRiverside, CA 92506 Travelers Property Casualty Company of America
Lexington Insurance Company
25674
19437
X
X
[email protected]
Y X
Ded $150k/EaClaim 1M 2,000,000Professional Liab.
173
Item 11.

174
Item 11.

A1
Wastewater Treatment Plant Expansion and Salt Mitigation Project, City of Beaumont (City) - Brad serves as Project Engineer for the City’s project which consists of two major components:

Brine Line - Final Design - Brine disposal is an integral part of this project and was a key driver in the selection of this project. Without a safe, reliable, and cost effective way to dispose of the brine, this project cannot move forward and compliance with the Basin Plan would be impossible. The brine pipeline connecting to the Inland Empire Brine Line (IEBL) was determined to be the best option during the feasibility study, due to cost and certainty of operation. The brine line has been sized at 12-inches and will be approximately 23-miles long. The pipeline begins at the City’s WWTP and ends near the City of San Bernardino’s WWTP on Waterman Avenue.

South Regional Lift Station Analysis, Western Riverside County Regional Wastewater Authority - Brad served as the Project Manager for this project. WEBB obtained as-built plans, pump information, current operating conditions, and ultimate flow projections from each agency. Based on the hydraulic analysis of the systems, WEBB determined the existing system maximum capacity and compared against ultimate daily and instantaneous flow projections. Since there Bradley A. Sackett, PE
Senior Engineer
Brad Sackett, PE, is a Senior Engineer and Project Manager with WEBB’s Water Resources Department. Brad specializes in assisting major public agencies with a wide variety of water resource projects. Clients seek his expertise with pumping facilities, water pipeline design, gravity sewer main design, water and sewer system master plans, hydraulic modeling analysis, and sewer resource plans for Specific Plan Environmental Impact Reports (EIRs), among other projects.

Brad has been instrumental in assisting clients with in-house projects, while representing these agencies with their constituents as an on-site consultant. Throughout Brad’s career he has been intricately involved in the design, management, and construction support of projects for such clients as Eastern Municipal Water District (EMWD), Western Municipal Water District (WMWD), and the cities of Riverside and St. Helena, to name a few.

His detailed approach ensures each project integrates flawlessly into master plan requirements from concept through construction. He specializes in operations take-over and integration of systems with a focus on cost effective and efficient transitions.

REGISTRATIONS
Registered Civil Engineer C 65862 (CA)

EDUCATION
BS, Chemical Engineering
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

AFFILIATIONS
American Water Works Association (AWWA)
Appendix A. Project Team Resumes
175
Item 11.

A2
Bradley A. Sackett, PE
Senior Engineer
is essentially no storage capacity in the South Regional Lift Station and conveyance system, all wet weather and peak flows must be pumped to the treatment plant to avoid sewer spills or discharges to the IEBL emergency connection. Flow projections included both dry weather and wet weather maximum flows based on estimates of peaking factors for both situations. Improvements were identified to meet the ultimate flow projects.

Baxter Road and Clearview Street Lift Stations, Eastern Municipal Water District Brad served as Senior Engineer for this project. Two lift stations were partially constructed during the mid-2000’s but were never completed when the housing market collapsed. With the recovery of the housing market and a revised development proposal, WEBB analyzed the proposed development plan based on revised tributary areas, determined the ultimate station capacity, inspected the existing facilities for current condition and salvageable facilities, re-designed and specified all required improvements and installation for both the renovated Baxter Road Lift Station, Clearview Street Lift Station, and the abandonment of the Menifee Court Lift Station.

Dauchy and Gamble Lift Stations, Western Municipal Water District - Brad served as Senior Engineer for this project. As part of a large residential development, WEBB designed the Dauchy and Gamble Sewer Lift Stations, the entire collection system, and force mains to convey sewage flows from the proposed residential development to the Western Water Reclamation Facility. WEBB was involved in all aspects of the project including planning, site location, design and assistance in construction.

Enchanted Heights Sewer System Infrastracture, Eastern Municipal Water District - Brad served as Senior Engineer for this project. WEBB prepared final engineering plans and specifications for a gravity collection system and accompanying lift station. This system included approximately 23,000 LF of 8-inch gravity pipe, 3,000 LF of 6-inch diameter force main, a new sanitary sewer lift station (Lukens) and modifications to an existing lift station (Diana). WEBB completed an evaluation of three potential site locations for the proposed lift station to provide the District flexibility in acquiring the required right-of-way. Critical issues included proximity to an elementary school for the emergency generator, permitting, geotechnical conditions including shallow rock and perched groundwater, on site connections to 446 residences, and the tri-party funding source from the City of Perris, Eastern Municipal Water District, and County of Riverside.

Green Valley Lift Station, Eastern Municipal Water District - Brad is currently overseeing the design of the Green Valley List Station for a developer within Eastern Municipal Water District’s service area. The station serves 460 residential units with a peak flow of 285 gpm.

Clay Street Lift Station, Jurupa Community Services District - Brad served as Project Manager for the relocation of the existing Clay Street Lift Station. The Clay Street Lift Station has a peak flow of 700 gpm, 25 hp pumping units with a 100 kw standby generator. WEBB provided design, planning, and construction management and inspection services for this project. This project consisted of 3,000 LF of 18-inch PVC sewer force main, 1,100 LF of 10-inch PVC sewer force main, 3,800 LF of 12-inch CML/CMC waterline and appurtenances, and construction of the sewer lift station. 176
Item 11.

A3
Brian Knoll, PE
Chief Operations Officer
Brian Knoll, PE, is WEBB’s Chief Operations Officer. Brian has been responsible for the design and direction of capital improvement projects throughout southern California. Brian’s expertise lies in planning, design, and construction oversight of water and wastewater facilities. Brian has been involved in numerous large multi-discipline water and wastewater projects including the City of Riverside’s 26 MGD expansion of their water quality control plant, the City of Beaumont’s advanced water treatment facility and brine line, the 14 MGD expansion of the Western Riverside Wastewater Treatment Plant, and the 6 MGD expansion of the Calipatria Water Treatment Plant. He has worked extensively with the City of Imperial, Western Municipal Water District, Golden State Water Company, the City of Corona, Crestline Lake Arrowhead Water Agency, Eastern Municipal Water District, the City of Riverside, and WRCRWA. Brian has also worked closely with other engineering partners such as CDM Smith, Black & Veatch, and CH2M Hill. His macro style in water resources leadership coupled with a practical approach, enhances Brian’s standing within the firm and the industry.

REGISTRATIONS
Registered Civil Engineer C 65690 (CA)
Registered Civil Engineer C 42407 (AZ)

EDUCATION
MS, Civil Engineering
Brigham Young University
BS, Civil Engineering
Brigham Young University

AFFILIATIONS
American Water Works Association (AWWA)
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
Water Environment Federation (WEF)
Inland County Water Association (ICWA)
“B” Street Lift Station, City of Imperial - Public Works - Brian served as Principal-in-Charge for this project. The “B” Street Lift Station was originally constructed as a submersible pump lift station with pumps 20-FT below the ground surface. These pumps consistently clogged and required excessive maintenance. The lift station was also a constant odor problem for the City. This project constructed a dry pit adjacent to the existing wet well with new non-clog Gorman-Rupp sewage pumps.

In addition, the project included oxygenation equipment to reduce odors, new shade structures, and upgraded electrical systems. WEBB also provided construction management and inspections services for this project.

Firehouse Sewer Lift Station, Olivenhain Municipal Water District - Brian served as project manager for the District’s project. The existing Firehouse Lift Station was constructed as a below grade packaged lift station within a steel enclosure. The enclosure was failing and also represented a safety hazard for operators due to the small exit.

The existing control building was also in disrepair with a leaking roof.

This project included the construction of a new dry pit, with improved access, new 750 GPM pumping units, new control building, bridge crane for pump removal, and miscellaneous site improvements.

Our work also included preparation of a sewer bypass plan to allow uninterrupted service during construction.
177
Item 11.

A4
Claypool Lift Station and Force Main, City of Imperial - Brian served as a Principal-in-Charge for the replacement of the Claypool Lift Station and new associated force main. The City of Imperial was experiencing reduced pumping capabilities in a damaged portion of force main that required the replacement of an existing pump station and the installation of a new force main. The project included the removal of the existing pump station, installation of two new pumps with controls, and the installation of 3,100 LF of 8-inch diameter PVC force main.

Sewer Lift Station #12, Lake Arrowhead Community Services District - Brian served as a Principal-in-Charge for the Sewer Lift Station #12 project for the District. WEBB provide engineering design services associated with the design of additional emergency storage at Sewer Lift Station #12. peak flow there is approximately fifteen minutes of emergency storage in the existing wet well.

WEBB designed a new below grade emergency storage vault immediately adjacent to the existing wetwell to expand that capacity to approximately one hour. The proposed vault will is located within the existing access road for Lift Station #12. The vault has an overflow weir to accept sewage flows when the sewage level in the existing wet well exceeds the high water level, a level sensor and alarm inter tied to the existing SCADA system, a bottom outlet with slide gate to drain the vault and a sloped bottom to facilitate cleaning.

Wastewater Treatment Plant Expansion and Salt Mitigation Project, City of Beaumont (City) - Brian serves as Principal-in-Charge and Project Manager for the City’s project which consists of two major components:

Waste Water Treatment Plant (WWTP) Expansion and Upgrade - Final Design The existing WWTP needs to be expanded and upgraded. The WWTP is currently treating over 75% of its permitted capacity and therefore must begin the expansion process. Per the new Regional Water Quality Control Board’s updated Basin Plan, the City must begin reducing TDS being discharged from the plant. The City completed a feasibility study to identify the best way to expand and upgrade the plant. The Plant will be converted to an MBR process followed by RO for TDS reduction. The Plant will also add screening, EQ, sludge dewatering, and drying.

Brian Knoll, PE
Chief Operations Officer
178
Item 11.

A5
River Road Lift Station, Jurupa Community Services District Dave served as Chief Design Engineer for this project. WEBB was responsible for the preliminary engineering and final design of this 19,000 GPM (27.3 MGD) ultimate capacity sewer lift station, utilizing 75 HP and 150 HP VFD vertical turbine solids handling pumping units. In addition, WEBB also developed an implementation plan to provide uninterrupted service during construction and startup of the lift station facilities. Once construction began, our team was responsible for coordination, on-site inspection services, and overall construction management.

The 55-FT deep wet well is a special design with a three compartment cast-in-place reinforced concrete structure self-cleaning wet well to better match flows at both interim and ultimate condition. The design also included a separate 35-FT deep diversion structure with sluice gates directing flow to each wet well compartment, connection to the plant headworks, grinder/comminutor, and standby emergency generator.

David Algranti, PE
Chief Design Engineer
David (Dave) Algranti, PE, is a Chief Design Engineer with WEBB’s Water Resources Department. Dave has years of experience in the planning, design, and construction of water resources projects.

With such deep knowledge of water-related systems, he assists as technical advisor for all WEBB teams handling such projects for clients. Dave helped develop WEBB’s quality management program, enabling him to coordinate and directly perform project quality control and assurance - making sure project technical issues are recognized early and resolved efficiently by an expert in the firm.

He has provided design and supervisory services for a wide range of water systems projects that provide reliable infrastructure to improve communities. These include water storage reservoirs, major water pumping plants, surge and water hammer control equipment, water treatment plants, water wells, and water transmission mains.

Clients also look to Dave for his experience with pressure station and metering facilities, utility relocation projects for state freeway projects, Clean Water Grant sewer construction projects, Department of Water Resources and U.S. Department of Agriculture Rural Development- funded water and sewer system upgrade projects, and sewage lift stations and force mains. In addition, he is well-versed in all aspects of construction management - ensuring projects proceed smoothly, remain on-schedule, and stay within budget.

Due to his recognized excellence in the industry, Dave is a member of the American Water Works Association (AWWA) Standards Committee on Steel Elevated Tanks, Standpipes, and Reservoirs.

REGISTRATIONS
Registered Civil Engineer C 26817 (CA)

EDUCATION
BS, Civil Engineering, California Polytechnic
University, Pomona

AFFILIATIONS
American Water Works Association (AWWA)
179
Item 11.

A6
David Algranti, PE
Chief Design Engineer
Regional Lift Station Improvements, Jurupa Community Services District - Dave served as Chief Design Engineer for this project. The Regional Sewer Lift Station, commonly referred to as Plant 1, is the main pumping station for the eastern half of the Jurupa Community Services District sewer service area to pump wastewater to the City of Riverside Regional Water Quality Control Plant for treatment. The facility is a wet well dry pit design with an ultimate capacity of 4,500 GPM.

The District has completed various improvements and modifications since Plant 1 and the associated Regional Force Main was originally constructed in the mid 1970’s. WEBB has been involved with nearly all aspects of planning, phasing, design, and construction of the facilities. The District has added 5 MG of emergency storage (equalization ponds and bypass pump station) which allows sewage to be bypassed for maintenance and repairs and inspection of the internal condition of the existing force main. Recent improvements included electrical and SCADA upgrades to improve reliability and site security, new wet well coating, and regional force main replacement. The Regional Force Main Replacement Project included approximately 3.5 miles of 24-inch diameter PVC pipeline through existing developed streets. Planned improvements included VFD and pump replacements to better match existing flow conditions and a final connection to the treatment plant. “B” Street Lift Station, City of Imperial - Public Works - Dave served as Chief Design Engineer for this project. The “B” Street Lift Station was originally constructed as a submersible pump lift station with pumps 20-FT below the ground surface. These pumps consistently clogged and required excessive maintenance. The lift station was also a constant odor problem for the City. This project constructed a dry pit adjacent to the existing wet well with new non-clog Gorman-Rupp sewage pumps. In addition, the project included oxygenation equipment to reduce odors, new shade structures, and upgraded electrical systems. WEBB also provided construction management and inspections services for this project.

Firehouse Sewer Lift Station Replacement, Olivenhain Municipal Water District - Dave served as Chief Design Engineer for this project. The existing Firehouse Lift Station was constructed as a below grade packaged lift station within a steel enclosure. The enclosure was failing and also represented a safety hazard for operators due to the small exit as shown in the photo above. The existing control building was also in disrepair with a leaking roof. This project included the construction of a new dry pit with improved access, new 750 GPM pumping units, new control building, bridge crane for pump removal, and miscellaneous site improvements. Our work also included preparation of a sewer bypass plan to allow uninterrupted service during construction. WEBB also provided construction management and inspection services for this project.

Gateway of the Americas, Sewer Lift Station No. 2, County of Imperial - Public Works - Dave served as Chief Design Engineer for this project. The existing sewer lift station required a complete overhaul and replacement. The project included replacement of two 5-hp submersible sewage pumping units, replacement equipment and pump appurtenances including pump guide rail system (to support three pumps), level control system, all hardware inside the wet well, and replacement of motor control center and electrical wiring. This project included the construction of a new dry pit with improved access, new 750 GPM pumping units, new control building, bridge crane for pump removal, and miscellaneous site improvements. Our work also included preparation of a sewer bypass plan to allow uninterrupted service during construction. 180
Item 11.

A7
Shane Bloomfield, PE
Senior Engineer
Shane Bloomfield, PE, is a Senior Engineer with WEBB’s Water Resources Department. Shane specializes in the design of public works projects consisting of major pumping plants, groundwater pumping wells, sewer collection system design, wet well rehabilitation, water distribution system design, wastewater treatment plant design, and hydraulic system modeling using various computer models. He has engineering design responsibilities for several projects for public works agency clients including the City of Ontario, City of Riverside, Jurupa Community Services District, Eastern Municipal Water District, and Crestline-Lake Arrowhead Water Agency.

REGISTRATIONS
Registered Civil Engineer C 77435 (CA)

EDUCATION
BS, Geology/Hydrology’
Brigham Young University
MS, Environmental Science & Engineering
Colorado School of Mines

AFFILIATIONS
National Groundwater Association (NGWA)
Replacement of Two Lift Station Pumps - Gateway of the
Americas, Sewer Lift Station No. 2, Imperial County Department of Public Works (ICDPW) - Shane served as the Project Manager for the replacement of two 5-hp submersible sewage pumping units for ICDPW’s Lift Station No. 2. Project specifications included the replacements of equipment and pump appurtenances systems, pump guide rail system (to support three pumps), level control system, and all hardware inside the wet well, replacement of motor control center, and electrical wiring.

Sewer System Improvement Projects Jurupa Community Services District - Shane served as the Project Engineer for a major project with several components to improve sewer system efficiency within the Jurupa Community Services District. The project included the Trunk Sewer System Improvements, the Regional Wastewater Pump System Expansion and New Force Main to the City of Riverside’s Water Quality Control Plant, and the Lakeside Lift Station Renovation. Working with the WEBB Team, Shane proposed a preliminary design for the various components of the project that facilitated the final design within the timeline specified by the Capital Improvement Program.

Claypool Lift Station and Force Main, City of Imperial - Shane served as a Project Engineer for the replacement of the Claypool Lift Station and new associated force main. The City of Imperial was experiencing reduced pumping capabilities in a damaged portion of force main that required the replacement of an existing pump station and the installation of a new force main. The project included the removal of the existing pump station, installation of two new pumps with controls, and the installation of 3,100 LF of 8-inch diameter PVC force main.
181
Item 11.

A8
Shane Bloomfield, PE
Senior Engineer
Lakeside Lift Station, Jurupa Community Services District - Shane served as a Project manager for the recommissioning of the Lakeside Lift Station. The Lakeside Lift Station and force main was decommissioned by the District when the Indian Hills Wastewater Reclamation Plant “Plant 2” was abandoned. The lift station had an 8-inch diameter overflow connection within its wet well structure.

Wastewater within the wet well surcharged and flowed into the overflow connection which outlet into a 12-inch diameter gravity main on Limonite Avenue, also known as the “Plant 2 Overflow Line”. Final evaluation indicated re-commissioning the station was feasible and cost effective. The design project consisted of preparing plans and specifications to re-commission the sewer lift station by removing the existing mechanical and electrical equipment and replace it with new equipment, including a new electrical service and vactor truck turnout.

Firehouse Sewer Lift Station, Olivenhain Municipal Water District - Shane served as Project Engineer for the District’s project. The existing Firehouse Lift Station was constructed as a below grade packaged lift station within a steel enclosure. The enclosure was failing and also represented a safety hazard for operators due to the small exit. The existing control building was also in disrepair with a leaking roof. This project included the construction of a new dry pit, with improved access, new 750 GPM pumping units, new control building, bridge crane for pump removal, and miscellaneous site improvements. Our work also included preparation of a sewer bypass plan to allow uninterrupted service during construction.

Claypool Lift Station and Force Main, City of Imperial - Brian served as a Principal-in-Charge for the replacement of the Claypool Lift Station and new associated force main. The City of Imperial was experiencing reduced pumping capabilities in a damaged portion of force main that required the replacement of an existing pump station and the installation of a new force main. The project included the removal of the existing pump station, installation of two new pumps with controls, and the installation of 3,100 LF of 8-inch diameter PVC force main.

Well Design & Equipping of Jurupa Community Services District Well Nos. 27 & 28, Jurupa Community Services District - Shane served as Project Manager on the well design & equipping of these wells. His responsibilities included pump (4,500 gpm to 4,000 gpm) and motor sizing (800 hp), emergency generator sizing, on-site chlorine generation system sizing, preparation of all civil and mechanical and coordination of the electrical and architectural drawings, preparation of bid documents, and technical specifications.

Well Drilling, Design, & Equipping of City of Ontario Well Nos. 40, 41, 45, 46, 47, 49, & 50, City of Ontario Municipal Utility Company - Shane served as Project Manager on the well drilling, design, & equipping of these City of Ontario wells. His responsibilities included pump (2,500 gpm to 3,500 gpm) and motor sizing (350 hp to 800 hp), emergency generator sizing, on-site chlorine generation system sizing, preparation of all civil and mechanical, and coordination of the electrical drawings, and preparation of bid documents and technical specifications for numerous groundwater drinking wells for the City of Ontario.
182
Item 11.

A9
Cheryl DeGano
Principal Environmental Analyst
Cheryl DeGano serves as a Principal Environmental Analyst with WEBB’s Planning and Environmental Department. Cheryl manages the preparation and approval of environmental and planning documents for public and private sector clients. During her consulting career, Cheryl has been responsible for the preparation and processing of environmental and planning documents including environmental impact reports, environmental assessments, initial studies and mitigated negative declarations, mitigation monitoring and reporting programs (MMRPs), specific plans, development impact fee (“Nexus”) studies per California Government Code 66000 et seq., and development and entitlement applications. Cheryl has been responsible for all aspects of these projects including research, data collection and analysis, report writing, quality assurance/quality control review, preparation of distribution lists, direction of public noticing, project management, representation at public meetings and hearings, and agency and client coordination. Cheryl is also experienced in the analysis of construction noise using the Federal Highway Administration’s Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM). In addition to her environmental and planning background, Cheryl has assisted public agencies and private sector clients finance public facilities/services through the formation and administration of special finance districts and is well versed in socio-economic issues.

Cheryl possesses strong communication and analytical skills and establishes and maintains excellent client relationships. Cheryl has a proven ability to take over large projects with minimal disruption to the client, experience with high profile and controversial studies, and the ability to work effectively and collaboratively within the increasingly complex regulatory and environmental context of development in southern California to develop solutions, strategies, and feasible alternatives for complex projects.

Cheryl is experienced in the preparation of environmental and planning documents and assisting public agencies and private sector clients finance public facilities/services through the formation and administration of special finance districts and the preparation of development impact fee studies. Strengths include communication and analytical skills, establishment and maintenance of excellent client relationships, proven ability to take over large projects with minimal disruption to client, experience with high profile and controversial studies, and a desire to work collaboratively toward a common goal.

EDUCATION
BA, Biology
University of California, Riverside

AFFILIATIONS
American Planning Association (APA)
Association of Environmental Professionals
(AEP)
AEP Co-Vice President of Programs 2019
AEP Inland Empire Chapter President 2013
183
Item 11.

A10
Stephanie Standerfer
Vice President
Stephanie Standerfer is a Vice President and Director of WEBB’s Planning and Environmental Department. Stephanie has worked as an environmental planning project manager, focusing on California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) matters for small, medium, and large public and private projects.

Stephanie has managed all levels of CEQA documents for healthcare clients, community college districts, water districts, cities, counties, and private developers. Her varied project experience allows her to foresee and navigate challenges that arise during CEQA compliance. As an expert in CEQA implementation throughout Inland Southern California, she also provides local agencies training in CEQA processing. She regularly oversees and coordinates with large teams of environmental planners, engineers, and architects and actively assists her clients through the environmental compliance gauntlet.

Stephanie served as contract staff to the Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority (RCA), the agency responsible for implementing the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP). In this role, she provided processing, review, and consultation on MSHCP implementation procedures and policies. She provided training and policy guidance documents to not only the RCA but all permittees which included all 17 cities in western Riverside County. In this capacity she regularly interfaced with regulatory agencies working toward solutions to MSHCP compliance issues. Stephanie’s experience with the RCA has resulted in a solid amicable working relationship with the regulatory agencies which allows her to anticipate issues on projects before they arise and advise clients accordingly.

Clients benefit from Stephanie’s interdisciplinary environmental planning background which includes experience on general plan updates, specific plans, planning studies, environmental constraints analyses, air quality impact studies, health risk assessments, noise studies, biological resource surveys, and cultural resource studies. She has managed small and large teams of subconsultants, engineers, and architects on a variety of controversial public works and private development projects over the years and often spearheads making public presentations on her projects.

Because of her reputation as a CEQA authority, clients seek out Stephanie’s assistance in peer reviewing CEQA documents and guidance on CEQA and MSHCP processing strategies. She enjoys working closely with her clients and establishing long-standing professional relationships with her clients.

EDUCATION
MS, Environmental Sciences,
Washington State University, Pullman, WA
BS, Environmental Sciences,
University of California, Riverside

AFFILIATIONS
American Planning Association (APA)
Association of Environmental Professionals
(AEP)
City of Riverside Cultural Heritage Board,
Chair (2003–2011)
184
Item 11.

A11
Autumn DeWoody, CPSWQ
Senior Environmental Analyst
Autumn DeWoody, CPSWQ, is a Senior Environmental Analyst with WEBB’s Planning and Environmental Department. Autumn offers clients a bridge between our technical municipal and stormwater engineering services and environmental documentation. She regularly partners with WEBB’s project managers to prepare various planning documents on behalf of our water, wastewater, and flood control district clients.

In addition, Autumn offers private and public clients jurisdictional delineations and regulatory permitting services as well as environmental monitoring at construction sites to ensure compliance with Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Plans (MMRPs). She has been repeatedly commended by clients on the frequency and helpfulness of timely updates during permit processing.

Autumn is a certified Level 1 Water Audit Validator and has also prepared Water Supply Assessments and Urban Water Management Plans for a variety of public and private clients. As a result, she appreciates the importance of timely client communication in order to collect pertinent data that is sufficiently detailed and accurate to provide a thorough reflection of the project. This data collection, communication, and collaboration early in the project has proven to keep projects on schedule and budget. She is familiar with the intricacies of complex water supply portfolios and the technical components of planning for future water demands.

Autumn brings a decade of water-related experiences in the Inland Empire including local university research in stormwater management, to non-profit water quality advocacy and on the-ground improvement projects, to commercial wet-chemistry laboratory work. Using her strong analytical skills at WEBB, Autumn reviews the hydraulic and/or hydrologic technical studies and ensures clients are provided the most current data on permitting regulation, surface and ground water quality, and local hydrology.

EDUCATION
MS, Environmental Sciences
University of California, Riverside
BS, Environmental Sciences
University of California, Riverside

CERTIFICATIONS
CPSWQ No. 0927
Certified Level 1 Water Audit Validator

AFFILIATIONS
Association of Environmental Professionals
(AEP)
Groundwater Resources Association of
California (GRA),
Southern California Chapter
185
Item 11.

A12
Subconsultants Qualifications
SKM, Inc.

Electrical Engineering
SKM, Inc. (SKM) will provide electrical engineering services for the District’s project. SKM, Inc. is a premier electrical engineering firm specializing in SCADA (supervisory control and data acquisition), telemetry, and electrical and control design. They employ a staff of highly trained electrical engineers with extensive experience in electrical design, instrumentation and controls, and PLC and HMI programming and design services. Their focus on wastewater and water systems provide clients with extensive process knowledge and understanding of water well and treatment projects.

Converse Consultants
Geotechnical Engineering
Converse Consultants provides professional services in the fields of geotechnical engineering, engineering geology, groundwater sciences, environmental sciences, and soils and materials testing and inspection. Their mission is to work together with clients to provide them with responsive and quality services, resulting in the development of long-term relationships. Clients include public agencies and private sector clients in the transportation, water/wastewater, educational, residential, commercial, and other market segments.

Kleinfelder
Structural Design
Kleinfelder will provide structural engineering services for the WEBB Team. Kleinfelder’s structural engineering services are delivered by a multi-disciplinary team of experts to various public agencies and private companies. During the past 25 years, their experienced structural engineers have gradually adapted to changing technology, codes, and standards. Kleinfelder’s structural design is fully integrated with technology using the most recent software developments such as BIM (Building Information Modeling), SAP 2000, Larsa 4D Bridge Plus, and others.

Kleinfelder’s structural engineers have extensive experience in the design and construction management support for a variety of projects utilizing current guidelines, codes, and standards. They have an outstanding reputation of accomplishing projects on time and within the original negotiated budget. 186
Item 11.

A13
C-Below
Potholing Services
C Below Subsurface Imaging (C Below) will provide potholing services for the WEBB Team. WEBB has worked on numerous water and sewer infrastructure projects with C Below. C Below specializes in subsurface imaging including utility locating, ground penetrating radar (GPR), and radiography. C Below is a certified SBE and will be providing potholing services for our team. One of the key advantages to using C Below for potholing is the training their technicians and operators undergo. Each new team member undergoes months of training in all processes before they are staffed on projects. The result is potholers that can locate and have a greater understanding of your needs.

Wood Environment and Infrastructure Solutions, Inc. (Wood E&I) Biological Resources
WEBB will team with a long-term partner, Wood E&I, to provide biological services including MSHCP surveys and regulatory permitting. Wood E&I is dedicated to technical excellence in the fields of biological issues including, but not limited to focused surveys for threatened and endangered species, Wetland Delineations, CRAM Assessments, Habitat Mitigation and Monitoring Plans, Wildlife Corridor Studies, Acoustic Studies, Mitigation/Restoration Planning and Monitoring, WEAP Training, Pre Construction Surveys, Construction Monitoring, and Post Construction Monitoring. WEBB has worked with Wood E&I for more than 60 years.

Wood E&I is dedicated to technical excellence in the fields of biological issues including, but not limited to focused surveys for threatened and endangered species, Wetland Delineations, CRAM Assessments, Habitat Mitigation and Monitoring Plans, Wildlife Corridor Studies, Acoustic Studies, Mitigation/Restoration Planning and Monitoring, WEAP Training, Pre Construction Surveys, Construction Monitoring, and Post Construction Monitoring. WEBB has worked with Wood E&I for more than 20 years. This long term relationship allows Wood to work as an extension of WEBB’s Staff and Project Managers.

Applied Earthworks, Inc. (Æ)
Cultural Resources
AE specializes in history, archaeology, paleontology, and cultural resources management. Current laws and regulations mandate consideration of prehistoric and historical remains. They use a variety of procedures to manage these resources without impeding progress. Through effective communication, technical expertise, economical and efficient project management, and creative solutions, AE makes it possible to build for the future without sacrificing our cultural heritage. WEBB and AE are currently working through AB52 compliance issues for other jurisdictions.

WEBB has partnered on multiple projects with AE over the past five years. 187
Item 11.

188
Item 11.

B1
Appendix B. Detailed Project Experience
Design Project Experience
Sewer Bond Projects (JCSD)
Jurupa Community Services District
Eddie Rhee, PE, Engineering Manager
Jurupa Community Services District
11201 Harrel Street
Jurupa Valley, CA 91752-3715
951.685.7434 x 118
[email protected]
• Florine Sewer Lift Station - 3,500 LF 10-inch diameter Gravity Main and Force Main (Complete) • Regional Sewer Lift Station – 7,500 GPM, 750 HP Capacity (Design) • Van Buren Bridge Force Main Crossing – 2,400 LF of 24-inch diameter Sewer (Complete) • Upgrades and Enhancements to Electrical/SCADA at Plant 1 (Complete) • Regional Force Main to City of Riverside WWTP – 17,600 LF of 24-inch diameter Force Main and 2,200 LF of 27-inch diameter Gravity Sewer (Complete)
• Pyrite Creek Trunk Sewer – 10,300 LF of 30-inch and 36-inch diameter Sewer Main, 7,200 LF of 8-inch to 21 inch diameter Sewer Main, 3,000 LF of Slip Lining and small Sewer Lift Station (Complete)
• Jurupa Road Trunk Sewer – 14, 600 LF of 10-inch, 18-inch, and 21-inch diameter Sewer Main (Complete)
• Sky Country Trunk Sewer – 8,100 LF of 12-inch and 18-inch diameter Sewer Main (Design) • Sky Country Trunk Sewer - 8,100 LF of 12-inch and 18-inch diameter Sewer Main (Complete) Condition Assessment Experience
• New 700 GPM, 25 hp pumping units with a 100 kw standby generator at the Linares Lift Station • A new 18-inch diameter regional force main segment within Clay Street • New 8-inch diameter gravity sewers within Clay Street and General Drive • Two new 12-inch diameter waterlines within Clay Street • A new 10-inch diameter sewer force main within Clay Street from railroad tracks to north of Linares Avenue
• Replacement of the pumps and electrical system for the existing Clay/Van Buren Lift Station, along with a new standby generator
Clay Street Lift Station
Replacement
Jurupa Community Services District
Eddie Rhee, PE, Engineering Manager
Jurupa Community Services District
11201 Harrel Street
Jurupa Valley, CA 91752-3715
951.685.7434 x 118
[email protected]
189
Item 11.

B2
The Lakeside Lift Station and force main was decommissioned by the District when the Indian Hills Wastewater Reclamation “Plant 2” was abandoned. The lift station has an existing 8-inch diameter overflow connection within its wet well structure. Currently, wastewater within the wet well surcharges and flows into this overflow connection which outlets into an existing 12-inch diameter gravity main on Limonite Avenue, also known as the “Plant 2 Overflow Line”. Because the wastewater must surcharge to flow into the Limonite Avenue line, there is an excessive build up of grease in the wet well that requires cleaning on a constant basis. The cleaning process to remove grease and waste build up creates a maintenance issue for the District. The original solution to resolve the maintenance issue was to convert the wet well to a “flow through” manhole to eliminate the surcharging and tie into the 12-inch gravity main in Limonite Avenue. During the design of the gravity system, utility potholing discovered a conflict with multiple utility lines in Limonite Avenue. It would not be feasible to avoid this conflict with the gas main by a proposed gravity line and therefore the original design concept was abandoned, and it was determined the lift station would be re-commissioned to avoid maintenance issues.

Lakeside Lift Station
Jurupa Community Services District
Eddie Rhee, PE, Engineering Manager
Jurupa Community Services District
11201 Harrel Street
Jurupa Valley, CA 91752-3715
951.685.7434 x 118
[email protected]
The “B” Street Lift Station was originally constructed as a submersible pump lift station with pumps 20-FT below the ground surface. These pumps consistently clogged and required excessive maintenance. The lift station was also a constant odor problem for the City. This project constructed a dry pit adjacent to the existing wet well with new non-clog Gorman-Rupp sewage pumps. In addition, the project included oxygenation equipment to reduce odors, new shade structures, and upgraded electrical systems. WEBB also provided construction management and inspections services for this project.
“B” Street Lift Station Upgrades
County of Imperial - Public Works
Jackie Loper, Community Development
Director
County of Imperial - Public Works
420 S. Imperial Avenue
Imperial, CA 92251-1637
760.355.1152
[email protected]
190
Item 11.

B3
• 60-inch diameter jacked and bore casing for 42-inch HDPE influent pipeline • 35-FT deep pre-cast manhole with sluice gate for emergency shutoff • 35-FT deep diversion structure to direct flows to any of the three wet well cells • SCADA operated 4-FT x 4-FT sluice gates in diversion structure • Hydraulically operated channel grinder
• Four sequentially operated, 75 HP VFD controlled vertical turbine solids handling pumps for initial capacity of 8,200 GPM; planned capacity increases up to 19,000 GPM • 20-FT x 60-FT x 60-FT deep cast-in-place wet well divided into three cells, each with two pumps in self cleaning sumps
• 20-inch diameter HDPE sewer force main to the WRCRWA Treatment Plant with provisions for a future parallel 30-inch SFM
• 650 KW standby generator
• Provisions for future odor control equipment
River Road Lift Station
Jurupa Community Services District
Eddie Rhee, PE, Engineering Manager
Jurupa Community Services District
11201 Harrel Street
Jurupa Valley, CA 91752-3715
951.685.7434 x 118
[email protected]
The Regional Sewer Lift Station, commonly referred to as Plant 1, is the main pumping station for the eastern half of the Jurupa Community Services District sewer service area to pump wastewater to the City of Riverside Regional Water Quality Control Plant for treatment. The facility is a wet well dry pit design with an ultimate capacity of 4,500 GPM. WEBB has been involved with nearly all aspects of planning, phasing, design, and construction of the facilities. Recent improvements included electrical and SCADA upgrades to improve reliability and site security, new wet well coating, and regional force main replacement.

The Regional Force Main Replacement Project included approximately 3.5 miles of 24-inch diameter PVC pipeline through existing developed streets. Planned improvements included VFD and pump replacements to better match existing flow conditions and a final connection to the treatment plant.

Regional Lift Station Improvements
Jurupa Community Services District
Eddie Rhee, PE, Engineering Manager
Jurupa Community Services District
11201 Harrel Street
Jurupa Valley, CA 91752-3715
951.685.7434 x 118
[email protected]
191
Item 11.

B4
As part of a large residential development, WEBB designed the Dauchy and Gamble Sewer Lift Stations, the entire collection system, and force mains to convey sewage flows from the proposed residential development to the Western Water Reclamation Facility. WEBB was involved in all aspects of the project including planning, site location, design, and assistance in construction.

Critical Issues
• Odor
• Space Constraints
• Sound Attenuation
Dauchy and Gamble Lift Stations
Western Municipal Water District
Derek Kawaii, PE, Director of Engineering
Western Municipal Water District
14205 Meridian Parkway
Riverside, CA 92518-3045
(951) 571-7100
[email protected]
The existing sewer lift station required a complete overhaul and replacement. The project included replacement of two 5-hp submersible sewage pumping units, replacement equipment and pump appurtenances including pump guide rail system (to support three pumps), level control system, all hardware inside the wet well, and replacement of motor control center and electrical wiring. This project included the construction of a new dry pit with improved access, new 750 GPM pumping units, new control building, bridge crane for pump removal, and miscellaneous site improvements.

Our work also included preparation of a sewer bypass plan to allow uninterrupted service during construction.

Applicable Issues:
• Wet Well Dry Pit
• Bypassing plan of Existing Flows
Gateway of the Americas, Sewer Lift
Station No. 2
County of Imperial - Public Works
John Gay, Deputy Director of Public Works
County of Imperial - Public Works
155 South 11th Street
El Centro, CA 92243-2803
442.265.1836
[email protected]
192
Item 11.

B5
WEBB Sewer Lift Station Projects (Representative List)
Capacity (GPM)Project Client
400 Lukens Lift Station EMWD
300 Diana Lift Station Improvements EMWD
130 Baxter Lift Station Retrofit EMWD
320 Clearview Lift Station Retrofit EMWD
285 Green Valley Lift Station EMWD
800 “B” Street Lift Station City of Imperial
1,000 Sandalwood Glen Lift Station Rehabilitation City of Imperial 700 Victoria Ranch Sewer Lift Station City of Imperial
500 Claypool Lift Station Improvements City of Imperial 750 Gateway of the Americas #2 Imperial County
19,000 River Road Lift Station JCSD
1,750 Chandler & Archibald Lift Station JCSD
1,000 Florine Lift Station Replacement JCSD
350 Lakeside Lift Station Rehabilitation JCSD
250 Sky Country Lift Station Rehabilitation JCSD
4500 Regional (Plant 1) Lift Station JCSD
700 Clay/Van Buren Lift Station JCSD
750 Linares Lift Staion JCSD
750 Firehouse Lift Station Olivenhain MWD
4,000 Horno Lift Station Evaluation Santa Margarita WD
750 Ripley Lift Station Riverside County-EDA
500 Green River Lift Station City of Corona
350 Gamble Lift Station WMWD
750 Dauchy Lift Station WMWD
3,500 South Regional Lift Station Analysis WMWD
800 1269 Lift Station Analysis WMWD
193
Item 11.

194
Item 11.

C1
Appendix C. CEQA Technical Study Detailed Scopes of Work Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas Emissions
WEBB will prepare an Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas (AQ/GHG) Analysis in accordance with the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) requirements for the construction of the pipeline alignment. The analysis will
• Calculate emissions from construction activities using the SCAQMD’s CalEEMod (version 2020.4.0) program
• Prepare a regional significance threshold analysis as well as a localized significance threshold analysis using the LST Look-Up Tables, per SCAQMD requirements • Compare project emissions to SCAQMD draft GHG thresholds • Analyze model results and incorporate mitigation measures, as appropriate, into the computer model.

A technical memorandum will summarize project-related emissions, identify potential impacts from the project, and recommend mitigation measures to reduce those impacts, as appropriate. WEBB will also calculate the energy consumption from both construction activities and long-term energy usage, if applicable, associated with the proposed project. Energy calculations will be presented in tables and included under separate cover. This scope includes revisions from one round of City comments that are editorial in nature.

Biological Resources
Wood will prepare an MSHCP Consistency Report, and (if needed) Jurisdictional Delineation, Protocol Burrowing Owl Survey, and Narrow Endemic Plant Surveys.

To prepare the MSHCP Consistency report Wood will:
• Perform an updated literature review of the project site and immediate vicinity to determine MSHCP consistency issues associated with the project site. A field survey will be conducted; using methodologies appropriate for the detection of special-status elements identified by the MSHCP. Depending on the timing of the field survey, certain elements may be undetectable, such as vernal pools. Habitat suitability will be assessed for all special-status elements potentially occurring on the site including burrowing owl, narrow-endemic plants, and vernal pools. If suitable habitat is present for the afore mentioned species within the project area and/or immediate vicinity, focused surveys may be required.
• Prepare a habitat suitability report which will include supporting documentation including a comprehensive species list, photographic figures, and maps according to the standards of the MSHCP. The report will describe the results of the biological assessment for the project. An electronic copy of the draft report will be provided for review. Following one round of review comments, any necessary changes will be incorporated into a final electronic report.

To complete the Jurisdictional Delineation Wood will:
• Update the Jurisdictional Delineation of jurisdictional areas in the vicinity of the proposed project in accordance with methodology in the Army Corps of Engineers 1987 Wetlands Delineation Manual, Arid West Supplement and applicable definitions in the California Fish and Game Code.

To make a jurisdictional determination and delineate potential waters, a Wood wetland specialist 195
Item 11.

C2
review of background information and visit the site to collect data upstream and downstream of the site location.

If suitable habitat to support burrowing owls is present, Wood will:
• Wood will perform focused Burrowing Owl surveys in accordance with the methodology described in MSHCP, augmented by the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (California Department of Fish and Game [now CDFW], March 7, 2012). The protocol focused BUOW surveys will include a survey of BUOW burrows on the site followed by focused BUOW surveys, on four separate days during the breeding season, based on the MSHCP requirements. If Burrowing Owl are present, a habitat loss mitigation and relocation program may be necessary. This proposal does not include costs for any type of BUOW habitat loss mitigation development or relocation program. If any additional tasks are indicated because of survey work, a separate cost proposal will be prepared.

Plant Surveys
Surveys for Munz’s onion and many-stemmed dudleya will be performed in all potentially suitable habitat areas within the project alignment during the appropriate flowering period, early April and late May. Surveys will be conducted in accordance with the guidelines established by the California Native Plant Society and California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG). The first site visit will be conducted in early April to account for the early blooming period and again in late May to account for the mid to late blooming period.

Following the field surveys, Wood will prepare a letter report of findings that will document the findings of the focused survey and, if applicable, will include a map of any observed sensitive plant species, including additional sensitive species not included in the list of species from the RCIP Conservation Summary Report Generator. Although USFWS and CDFG do not have a standard requirement for written reports, a letter report of findings will be prepared and submitted to the client and regulatory agencies as appropriate. Wood will also conduct a recent search of the California Native Plant Species Electronic Inventory (CNPSEI) and California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB). In addition to the site description, methodology, and findings, the report will describe the areas of the site that are occupied by Munz’s onion and many-stemmed dudleya and provide an estimate of the number of occupied acres. Mitigation recommendations for potential impacts to sensitive plant species observed on the project site will also be included in the report.

Cultural Resources
Applied Earthworks will:
• Complete a cultural resource literature and records search at the Eastern Information Center (EIC), housed at the University of California, Riverside. • Contact the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) for a search of the Sacred Lands Files (SLF). Æ also will contact Tribes/individuals identified by the NAHC with local Traditional Use Areas that may have information regarding Native American cultural resources within the vicinity of the APE. Æ will initiate contact by emailed letter to be followed-up by email or telephone. • Conduct an intensive pedestrian field survey of the Project area. Survey transect spacing will range from 10 to 15 meters (30 to 50 feet) insofar as possible and the ground surface of all landforms with likely intact and significant cultural resources, if any, also will be examined. Additionally, Æ’s Archaeologist will investigate any unusual contours, soil changes, distinctive vegetation patterns, features (e.g., road cuts, ditches, and stream cuts), and other potential cultural site markers. 196
Item 11.

C3
• Prepare a report of findings, to Section 106 and CEQA standards. This report will describe the Project, cultural setting, desktop and field investigation methods, survey results, and management recommendations. The report also will incorporate the results of the records search from the EIC as well as communication with local Native American tribes. • Submit draft reports electronically in MS Word format for ease of review and submit final report electronically as a PDF file. After the City and federal agency has approved the report, Æ will submit one hardcopy of the final report to the EIC.

Paleontological Resources
Applied Earthworks will:
• Request museum records searches from the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County (NHMLAC) and the Western Science Center (WSC) for recorded paleontological resource localities within and in the vicinity of the project boundary. we also will complete reviews of online paleontological records at the University of California Museum of Paleontology (UCMP) and the Paleobiology Database.
• Supplement museum collections records by reviewing published and unpublished geologic mapping and literature to identify the geology and paleontology of the project area. Upon receipt of the museum records search results and completion of the desktop study, Æ will conduct a pedestrian field survey to verify the High paleontological sensitivity of the project area. The field paleontologist will visually inspect the ground surface for exposed fossils within the project area and evaluate geologic exposures in and adjacent to the project area for their potential to include preserved fossil material in the subsurface.
• Prepare a paleontological technical memorandum documenting the desktop and field findings and will provide project-specific recommendations. All paleontological work will meet the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology’s (SVP) guidelines. One round of minor comments will be addressed following City and federal regulatory agency review of the draft memorandum. 197
Item 11.

198
Item 11.

D1
Appendix D. Project Schedule
ID Task Name Start Finish Duration
1 Task 1 - Project Management Tue 2/15/22 Mon 1/2/23 229 days 2 Kick off Meeting Tue 2/15/22 Tue 2/15/22 0 days
3 Monthly Coordination Tue 3/1/22 Mon 1/2/23 219 days
15 16 Design Presentations / Meetings Mon 3/21/22 Mon 10/24/22 155 days 17 Draft Preliminary Design Workshop Mon 3/21/22 Mon 3/21/22 0 days 18 60% Design Review Workshop Mon 7/25/22 Mon 7/25/22 0 days 19 90% Design Review Workshop Mon 10/24/22 Mon 10/24/22 0 days 20 21 Task 2 - Data Gathering and Analysis Tue 2/15/22 Mon 3/28/22 30 days 22 Utility Research Tue 2/15/22 Mon 3/28/22 6 wks
23 Data Gathering Tue 2/15/22 Mon 2/21/22 1 wk
24 Independent Review of previous reports Tue 2/22/22 Mon 2/28/22 1 wk 25 Prepare Draft Technical Memorandum Tue 3/1/22 Mon 3/7/22 1 wk 26 City Review Tue 3/8/22 Mon 3/21/22 2 wks
27 Final Technical Memorandum Tue 3/22/22 Mon 3/28/22 1 wk 28 29 Task 3 - Investigations Tue 2/15/22 Mon 5/9/22 60 days 30 Survey Tue 2/15/22 Mon 3/28/22 6 wks
31 Potholing Map Tue 3/29/22 Mon 4/4/22 1 wk
32 Potholing Tue 4/5/22 Mon 4/18/22 2 wks
33 FM Alignment Selection Tue 4/19/22 Mon 5/2/22 2 wks
34 Geotechnical Investigation Tue 2/22/22 Mon 4/4/22 6 wks 35 Hydraulic Analysis Tue 5/3/22 Mon 5/9/22 1 wk
36 Condition Assessment - Lift Station Tue 2/22/22 Mon 3/21/22 4 wks 37 Operational Control Strategy Tue 3/22/22 Mon 4/11/22 3 wks 38 Final Technical Memorandum Tue 5/3/22 Mon 5/9/22 1 wk 39 40 Task 4 - Environmental Services Tue 2/15/22 Mon 8/22/22 135 days 41 CEQA Documentation - Addendum (includes City review time)Tue 8/9/22 Mon 8/22/22 2 wks 42 Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas Emissions Tue 5/10/22 Mon 6/20/22 6 wks 43 Biological Resources Assessments (assumes focused surveys required)
Tue 3/8/22 Mon 8/8/22 22 wks
44 Cultural Resources Assessment Tue 2/15/22 Mon 7/4/22 20 wks 45 Paleontological Resources Assessment Tue 2/15/22 Mon 5/9/22 12 wks 46 47 Task 5 - Easement Acquisition Support Tue 5/10/22 Mon 8/8/22 65 days 48 Prepare Exhibits and base maps Tue 5/10/22 Mon 5/16/22 1 wk 49 Prepare legal descriptions and plat maps Tue 5/10/22 Mon 5/23/22 2 wks 50 Permitting Tue 5/10/22 Mon 8/8/22 13 wks
51 52 Task 6 - SCE Electrical Service Upgrade Tue 5/10/22 Mon 10/24/22 120 days 53 Initial SCE Coordination Tue 5/10/22 Mon 5/30/22 3 wks 54 SCE Coordination Tue 7/26/22 Mon 8/1/22 1 wk
55 SCE Design Process Tue 8/2/22 Mon 10/24/22 12 wks
56 Final Approved SCE Service Plan Mon 10/24/22 Mon 10/24/22 0 wks 57 58 Task 7 - Preparation of Contract Documents Tue 5/10/22 Mon 12/12/22 155 days 59 60% Design Tue 5/10/22 Mon 7/4/22 8 wks
60 City Review Tue 7/5/22 Mon 7/25/22 3 wks
61 60% Design Workshop Mon 7/25/22 Mon 7/25/22 0 days
62 90% Design Tue 7/26/22 Mon 10/3/22 10 wks
63 City Review Tue 10/4/22 Mon 10/24/22 3 wks
64 90% Design Workshop Mon 10/24/22 Mon 10/24/22 0 wks
65 Prepare 100% Design Tue 10/25/22 Mon 11/21/22 4 wks
66 City Review Tue 11/22/22 Mon 12/12/22 3 wks
67 68 Task 8 - Bid Support Mon 1/2/23 Fri 2/3/23 25 days 69 Construction Bidding Mon 1/2/23 Fri 1/27/23 4 wks
70 Hold Pre-Bid Meeting Mon 1/9/23 Fri 1/13/23 1 wk
71 Prepare Addenda Mon 1/16/23 Fri 1/20/23 1 wk
72 Bid Opening Fri 1/27/23 Fri 1/27/23 0 wks
73 Review bid results Mon 1/30/23 Fri 2/3/23 1 wk
74 75 Construction Mon 2/6/23 Fri 3/1/24 280 days
76 Construction Contract Award Mon 2/6/23 Fri 3/3/23 4 wks 77 Construction Mon 3/6/23 Fri 3/1/24 52 wks
2/15
3/21
7/25
10/24
10/24
7/25
10/24
1/27
30 6 13 20 27 6 13 20 27 3 10 17 24 1 8 15 22 29 5 12 19 26 3 10 17 24 31 7 14 21 28 4 11 18 25 2 9 1623 30 6 13 20 27 4 11 18 25 1 8 15 22 29 5 121926 5 12 19 26 2 9 16 2330 7 14 21 28 4 11 18 25 2 9 16 23 30 6 13 20 27 3 10 1724 1 8 15 22 29 5 12 1926 3 10 17 24 31 7 14 21 28 4 11 18 25 3 10 17 24 3 Feb '22 Mar '22 Apr '22 May '22 Jun '22 Jul '22 Aug '22 Sep '22 Oct '22 Nov '22 Dec '22 Jan '23 Feb '23 Mar '23 Apr '23 May '23 Jun '23 Jul '23 Aug '23 Sep '23 Oct '23 Nov '23 Dec '23 Jan '24 Feb '24 Mar '24

CITY OF BEAUMONT, CA

PROJECT SCHEDULE
Beaumont Mesa Lift Station and Force Main Project
\\elsinore\WO2\Proposals\FORMAL PROPOSALS\City of Beaumont\015102 - Mesa Lift Station and Force Main\Project Schedule - 015102.mpp 199
Item 11.

200Item 11.

Staff Report

TO: City Council
FROM: Jeff Hart, Public Works Director
DATE February 15, 2022
SUBJECT: Approval of the First Amendment to the Professional Services Agreement with Chambers Group, Inc., for Environmental
Documentation Services for the West Side Fire Station Project in the Amount of $34,613, with the Total Contract Amount Not to Exceed $59,506

Background and Analysis:

On September 16, 2021, City staff engaged Chambers Group, Inc. (Chambers), for environmental documentation services for the West Side Fire Station Project (Project) in the amount of $24,893 (see Attachment A). The scope of services within this contract included data collection, document review, field studies and site visits, and environmental documentation and clearance for the Project (see Attachment B).

The environmental document has been prepared and was posted for a mandatory 30 - day public review on January 21, 2022. In the process of performing the required technical studies and preparing the environmental document it was identified that regulatory permitting would be required. Chambers has provided a scope and fee to assist City staff with permit coordination and applications with the United States Army Corp of Engineers, the Regional Water Quality Control Board, and the California Department of Fish and Wildlife.

City staff is requesting that City Council approve a contract amendment with Chambers in the amount of $34,613 to assist with environmental permitting.

201
Item 12.

Project Accounting Update:

The following table is an overview of project funding available:

Project Funding Summary
Development Impact Fees $4,100,000
General Fund Reserves (FY19-24) $4,550,000

Total Project Funding $8,650,000

The following table is an overview the project accounting summary:

2017-028 Project Summary
Project Components Budget Amount
Contract
Amounts

Remaining
Project Management $25,000.00 $25,000.00
Project Contingency
Preliminary Services $7,500.00 $7,500.00 $0.00
Preliminary Services Contingency
Environmental $107,199.00 $106,197.22 $1,001.78
Environmental Contingency
Design $265,301.00 $265,301.00 $0.00
Design Contingency
Construction $7,450,000.00 $7,450,000.00
Construction Contingency $745,000.00 $745,000.00
Construction Management
Construction Management
Contingency

Permits $50,000.00 $50,000.00
Equipment
Misc.

Project Summary Totals $8,650,000.00 $378,998.22 $8,271,001.78

Fiscal Impact:

The cost associated with preparing this staff report is $350.

202
Item 12.

Recommended Action:

Attachments:

A. Professional Services Agreement with Chambers Group, Inc.

B. First Amendment to Professional Services Agreement with Chambers Group, Inc.

C. Chambers Group – Change Order
203
Item 12.

204
Item 12.

205
Item 12.

206
Item 12.

207
Item 12.

208
Item 12.

209
Item 12.

210
Item 12.

211
Item 12.

COO
Mike McEntee
212
Item 12.

213
Item 12.

214
Item 12.

215
Item 12.

216
Item 12.

217
Item 12.

218
Item 12.

219
Item 12.

FIRST AMENDMENT TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF BEAUMONT AND CHAMBERS GROUP, INC. FOR ENVIRONMENTAL

SERVICES FOR THE WEST SIDE FIRE STATION PROJECT

THIS SECOND AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BY INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR is made and effective as of the 16th day of February, 2022, by and between the CITY OF BEAUMONT, a general law city, (“CITY”) whose address is 550 E. 6th Street, Beaumont, California 92223 and Chambers Group, Inc. whose address is 5 Hutton Centre Drive, Suite 750, Santa Ana, CA 92707 (“CONTRACTOR”) in consideration of the mutual promises and purpose contained herein, the parties agree as follow:

1. RECITALS

This Second Amendment is made with respect to the following facts and purpose that the parties agree are true and correct:

A. On September 16th, 2021, the City and Chambers Group, Inc. entered into that certain agreement entitled “Agreement for Professional Services by Independent Contractor” for providing Environmental Documentation Services for the West Side Fire Station Project. (“Agreement”).

B. City has requested a further change in scope to the work under the Agreement regarding Environmental Services a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit “A”, and incorporated herein by this reference.

2. AMENDMENT

Section 2 of the Agreement is hereby amended to add to the Services those services identified in the Proposal attached hereto as Exhibit “A”.

Section 4.01 of the Agreement is hereby amended to increase the maximum compensation under the Agreement as follows: Under the original Agreement, compensation was set at an amount not to exceed Twenty Four Thousand Eight Hundred Ninety Three Dollars ($24,893.00).

Per this First Amendment, compensation of Twenty Four Thousand Eight Hundred Ninety Three Dollars ($24,893.00) is increased by the maximum amount of Thirty Four Thousand Six Hundred Thirteen Dollars ($34,613.00) as provided in the Proposal attached hereto as Exhibit “A” resulting in total compensation under the Agreement not to exceed Fifty Nine Thousand Five Hundred Six Dollars ($59,506.00).

The recitals to this Amendment are deemed incorporated herein by this reference. All other terms of the Agreement not expressly amended by this Amendment shall remain in full force and effect.
220
Item 12.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereby have made and executed this First Amendment to Professional Services Agreement to be effective as of the day and year first above-written.

CITY:

CITY OF BEAUMONT

By: ________________________________
Lloyd White, Mayor

CONTRACTOR:

________________________________

By: ______________________________

Print Name: _______________________

Title: _____________________________

221
Item 12.

EXHIBIT “A”

PROPOSAL DATED January 27th, 2022
222
Item 12.

Change Order: West Side Fire Station
City of Beaumont

1 63757

January 27, 2022
Christina Taylor, Community Development Director
City of Beaumont
550 E. Sixth Street
Beaumont, CA 92223
Subject: Change Order for the West Side Fire Station Project to Perform USACE, RWQCB, and CDFW Permit Coordination and Applications
Dear Christina Taylor,
Chambers Group thanks the City of Beaumont (City) for the opportunity to provide the following scope and cost for jurisdictional waters permitting for the construction of an approximately 10,000 square-foot fire station on a 1.5-acre parcel located north of State Route 60 and east of Potrero Road (Proposed Project).

As with the CEQA document, a Jurisdictional Delineation (JD) and Determination of Biologically Equivalent or Superior Preservation Report (DBSEP) have been completed for the Proposed Project and will be relied upon for the completion of this work.

Scope of Work
Chambers Group can commence work on this Proposed Project as soon as we receive written notice to proceed (NTP).

We will accomplish the scope of work as described below.

Task 6: USACE, RWQCB, and CDFW Permit Coordination and Applications Chambers Group assumes the City will directly pay any associated project permit fees to the corresponding regulatory agencies for this task, as applicable.

Preparation of USACE 404 Permit Applications
The level of work associated with preparing the notification to the USACE pursuant to Section 404 is dependent on the magnitude of project impacts on jurisdictional waters and other resources. The delineation determines if the project requires an individual permit or if it could fall under a nationwide permit. Based on the findings of the JD, Chambers Group assumes the project would qualify for a non-notifying Nationwide Permit (NWP), which would expedite the permitting process compared to an Individual Permit. If it is determined that a NWP is not valid for the final project description, Chambers Group will inform the City and additional costs may be required. This cost estimate includes preparation of the supporting information to identify the project qualifies for a non-notifying NWP and no coordination with USACE is included.

Preparation of Written Notification for Water Quality (401) Certification A water quality certification is required from the RWQCB for any activity that requires a federal license or permit (such as a Section 404 permit) and may result in a discharge to jurisdictional waters. Recently, RWQCB has required pre-filing application meetings a minimum of 30 days prior to the submittal of an application. Chambers Group will coordinate the meeting and prepare and submit the necessary documentation to the RWQCB for its review of the project pursuant to water quality certification. Chambers Group will schedule one additional meeting with the RWQCB at the project site, if necessary, to facilitate the RWQCB’s review of the project and completion of the water quality certification. This cost estimate includes no more than two rounds of comments from RWQCB and those comments do not request or require further study than what is readily available and/or identified in this proposal.

Preparation of CDFW 1600 Permit Application
Chambers Group will prepare and submit a notification to CDFW for a 1600 Lake and Streambed Alteration Agreement (SAA). CDFW has recently transitioned to an entirely online application process through the Environmental Permit Information Management System (EPIMS). This will require the City to have an account on EPIMS to initiate the permit application and sign any documentation or electronically provide Chambers Group permissions to sign on the City’s 223
Item 12.

Change Order: West Side Fire Station
City of Beaumont

2 63757

behalf. Chambers Group will schedule one meeting with CDFW at the Project site, if necessary, to facilitate CDFW’s review of the project and completion of the Agreement. This cost estimate includes no more than two rounds of comments from CDFW and those comments do not request or require further study than what is readily available and/or identified in this proposal.

Permit Application Processing
Chambers Group will coordinate with CDFW and RWQCB throughout their review of the 401 and 1600 Permit applications to ensure that any potential concerns are made known to the City and resolved at the earliest possible opportunity. If the regulatory permits are being prepared in concurrence with the CEQA document rather than subsequent, they will be submitted to the agencies at the time of the Draft circulation to ensure that the permits are processed in a timely manner along with the rest of the Project. This also ensures that the agencies are involved in the preparation of the environmental document and mitigation development, if necessary.

Deliverables: Supporting Documentation for Qualification for Non-Notifying NWP; Draft and Final Permit Applications for 401 and 1600
Costs
This work is proposed at a firm fixed cost as shown below:

Task Cost
Task 6: Permitting $34,613.00
TOTAL $34,613.00
.

Authorization
The services proposed herein are in compliance with the terms and conditions of the Master Services Agreement (MSA), dated July 17, 2018. Chambers Group considers the pricing and other business information the property of Chambers Group. This proposal and the information contained herein shall not be used for any purpose other than as specifically stated and shall not be disclosed to any other party without Chambers Group's written consent.

If City of Beaumont elects to use a purchase order or other document to commence the services or for billing or accounting purposes, Chambers Group will refer to such document by number in its correspondences, invoices, and work products. If this scope of work and cost meet with your satisfaction, please execute this letter and return it to Chambers Group as our authorization to begin work. The schedule and cost quoted herein are valid for 30 days.

Thank you for the opportunity to provide this proposal, and we look forward to having the opportunity to continue working with you. Please call or email Corinne Lytle Bonine at (858) 541-2800 extension 7100, or via email at clytle- [email protected] if you have any questions or comments regarding this proposal.

Sincerely, Authorized By:

CHAMBERS GROUP, INC. City of Beaumont
Mike McEntee
President Signature

Date
224
Item 12.

Staff Report

TO: City Council
FROM: Jeff Hart, Public Works Director
DATE February 15, 2022
SUBJECT: Authorize the Purchase of Trimble S7 Survey Equipment with California Surveying and Drafting Supply in an Amount Not to Exceed $44,031.88

Background and Analysis:

A critical component of every Public Works project is the acquisition and delivery of survey information, which includes boundary, horizontal and vertical control, benchmarks, topographic features, surface features, appurtenances, sightline surveys, and construction staking. Additionally, several Transit, Parks and Recreation, and Wastewater projects require similar survey information.

The Public Works Department does not have any survey-grade surveying equipment.

Consequently, City staff must rent equipment or hire a consultant to perform the survey work regardless of the size of the project. The average cost to rent equipment is approximately $500 per day. The average cost to have a consultant provide surveying services for a street improvement project is approximately $24,000 per mile. With the acquisition, the City will now be able to utilize equipment to perform in-house surveys for various public works projects, as well as assist other departments by providing support that would have otherwise required rental equipment or engagement of outside consultants.

City staff obtained a quote to purchase a Trimble S7 total robotic station from California Surveying Drafting Supply (CSDS). Refer to Attachment A for quote. CSDS has an existing, competitively solicited, cooperative contract (Contract No. 1-21-66-03) with the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) and the Department of Water Resources (DWP). The contract permits local governmental agencies to utilize the State contract for pricing (see Attachment B). By utilizing the State contract, the City will save approximately 15% from the retail price.

225
Item 13.

Fiscal Impact:

The one-time cost for the purchase of the Trimble S7 survey equipment is $44,031.88 and is included in the FY 21/22 budget in the amount of $45,000. The purchase will be paid for from the Public Works Equipment Fund (GL100-3100-8040-000). City staff estimates the costs to prepare this report to be $75.

Recommended Action:

Approve and authorize the issuance of a purchase order to California Surveying Drafting Supply for Trimble S7 Survey Equipment in the amount of $44,031.88.

Attachments:

A. CSDS Quote
B. State Contract No. 1-21-66-03
226
Item 13.

4733 Auburn Blvd
Sacramento, CA 95841
USA
Pro Forma forOrder
91123109
Bill-To-Party

CITY OF BEAUMONT
550 E 6TH ST
Beaumont CA 92223 USA
Ship-To-Party

CITY OF BEAUMONT
550 E 6TH ST
BEAUMONT CA 92223 USA
Item Material/Description Quantity Price Price Unit Value 2000 566544 1 EA 5,040.00 USD 1 EA 5,040.00 USD
TSC7 QWERTY WITH NO SOFTWARE
Manufacturer Part No.: TSC7-1-1111-00
Percentage Discount -15.000%-756.00
Net Value 2 4,284.00USD 4,284.00
3000 566541 1 EA 1,417.50 USD 1 EA 1,417.50 USD
TSC5/7/T100/RANGER 5/7 2.4GHZ RAD MODULE
Manufacturer Part No.: 110238-00-1
Percentage Discount -15.000%-212.63
Net Value 2 1,204.87USD 1,204.87
4000 501024 1 EA 3,105.00 USD 1 EA 3,105.00 USD

MULTITRACK TARGET INCLUDES LITH-ION BATT
Manufacturer Part No.: MT1000
Percentage Discount -15.000%-465.75
Net Value 2 2,639.25USD 2,639.25
5000 566538 1 EA 83.00 USD 1 EA 83.00 USD
TRIMBLE TSC7 SHOULDER SLING BAG
Manufacturer Part No.: 121354-01-1
Percentage Discount -15.000%-12.45
Net Value 2 70.55USD 70.55
6000 566534 1 EA 208.80 USD 1 EA 208.80 USD
TRIMBLE TSC7/RANGER 7 POLE MOUNT BRACKET
Manufacturer Part No.: 121349-01-1
Tel: +1-800-243-1414 www.csdsinc.com
[email protected]

Page 1 of 4 ends

Information
Document Number:91123109
Document Date:02/03/2022
Ref.Order No./Date:701476 / 02/03/2022
Ref. Order Type:Standard Order
PO No.:Pending
PO Date:

Customer No.:1108422
Ship-To No.:1108422
Terms of Payment:Payable upon receipt
227
Item 13.

4733 Auburn Blvd
Sacramento, CA 95841
USA
Pro Forma forOrder
91123109
Item Material/Description Quantity Price Price Unit Value Percentage Discount -15.000%-31.32
Net Value 2 177.48USD 177.48
7000 596437 1 EA 395.00 USD 1 EA 395.00 USD
LEICA GST120 WOOD TRIPOD
Manufacturer Part No.: 667-301
8000 558650 1 EA 1,035.90 USD 1 EA 1,035.90 USD
2 X R10 DUAL BATTERY CHARGER
Manufacturer Part No.: 101070-02-01
Percentage Discount -15.000%-155.39
Net Value 2 880.51USD 880.51
9000 568454 1 EA 1,278.00 USD 1 EA 1,278.00 USD

ROBOTIC POWER KIT W/CASE FOR DUAL CHRGS
Manufacturer Part No.: SLSU-S2018-3
Percentage Discount -15.000%-191.70
Net Value 2 1,086.30USD 1,086.30
10000 566535 1 EA 441.00 USD 1 EA 441.00 USD
TSC7 EXT BATT CHGR W/INT CORD & 2 BATTS
Manufacturer Part No.: 121358-01-1
Percentage Discount -15.000%-66.15
Net Value 2 374.85USD 374.85
11000 517102 1 EA 3,250.00 USD 1 EA 3,250.00 USD

TRIMBLE ACCESS-GENERAL SURVEY - PERP LIC
Manufacturer Part No.: TA-GENSURV-P
Percentage Discount -15.000%-487.50
Net Value 2 2,762.50USD 2,762.50
12000 500361 1 EA 1,750.00 USD 1 EA 1,750.00 USD
Specialized Application Roads, perpetual
Manufacturer Part No.: SA-ROADS-P
Percentage Discount -15.000%-262.50
Net Value 2 1,487.50USD 1,487.50
13000 573997 1 EA 49.50 USD 1 EA 49.50 USD

TRIMBLE MCS USB TO USB TRANSFER CABLE
Manufacturer Part No.: ACCAA-574
Percentage Discount -15.000%-7.43
Tel: +1-800-243-1414 www.csdsinc.com
[email protected]

Page 2 of 4 ends

228
Item 13.

4733 Auburn Blvd
Sacramento, CA 95841
USA
Pro Forma forOrder
91123109
Item Material/Description Quantity Price Price Unit Value Net Value 2 42.07USD 42.07
14000 547575 1 EA 340.32 USD 1 EA 340.32 USD
ROBOTIC POLE 8.5',CM/.01,135,TLV
15000 547577 1 EA 210.09 USD 1 EA 210.09 USD
SECO, Thumb-Release Bipod - Yellow
Manufacturer Part No.: 5217-04-YEL
15010 520319 1 EA 25,215.25 USD 1 EA 25,215.25 USD
TRIMBLE S7 2" ROB, DRPLUS, VIS, FL, SCN
Manufacturer Part No.: S7253200x
Subtotal before taxes 41,170.54 USD
Tax Jur Code Level 1 6.00 % 2,215.23
USD
Tax Jur Code Level 2 1.25 % 461.51 USD
Tax Jur Code Level 4 0.50 % 184.60 USD
x
Total Amount 44,031.88 USD
x
Amount to pay: 44,031.88 USD
Remit Payment To: California Surveying & Drafting Supply 4733 Auburn Blvd, Sacramento, CA 95841 Tel: +1-800-243-1414 www.csdsinc.com
[email protected]

Page 3 of 4 ends

229
Item 13.

Terms and Conditions

Page 4 of 4 ends

230
Item 13.

Department of General Services
Procurement Division
707 Third Street, 2nd Floor
West Sacramento, CA 95605-2811
State of California

STATEWIDE CONTRACT

USER INSTRUCTIONS
All changes to most recent Supplement are in bold red italic. Additions are enclosed in asterisks, *, and deletions are enclosed in brackets, [].

MANDATORY
ISSUE AND EFFECTIVE DATE: 8/24/2021
CONTRACT NUMBER: 1-21-66-03
DESCRIPTION: Land Survey Products, Trimble Brand
CONTRACTOR: California Surveying and Drafting
Supply, Inc.

CONTRACT TERM: 8/26/2021 through 8/25/2024
STATE CONTRACT ADMINISTRATOR: Sarah Samaan
(916) 375-4432
[email protected]
The contract user instructions, products, and pricing are included herein. All purchase documents issued under this contract incorporate the contract terms and applicable California General Provisions:

IT General Provisions, rev 09/05/2014
( http://www.documents.dgs.ca.gov/dgs/fmc/gs/pd/pd_401IT.pdf) Cal eProcure link: www.caleprocure.ca.gov

ORDER PLACEMENT INFORMATION
Mailing Address:

California Surveying &
Drafting Supply, Inc.
4733 Auburn Blvd.

Sacramento, CA 95841
Fax/Email:

Fax: (916) 344-2998
Email: [email protected]
Contact Information:

California Surveying &
Drafting Supply, Inc.

Mike Woodel

Phone: (916) 344-0232
Email: [email protected]

231
Item 13.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES

PROCUREMENT DIVISION
Contract Mandatory 1-21-66-03
Contract User Instructions

Page 2 ends

All changes to most recent Supplement are in bold red italic. Additions are enclosed in asterisks; deletions are enclosed in brackets.

SUMMARY OF CHANGES
Supplement
Number Description/Articles Supplement
Date
N/A Original Contract Posted

8/24/2021
All other terms and conditions remain the same.

232
Item 13.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES

PROCUREMENT DIVISION
Contract Mandatory 1-21-66-03
Contract User Instructions

Page 3 ends

233
Item 13.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES

PROCUREMENT DIVISION
Contract Mandatory 1-21-66-03
Contract User Instructions

Page 4 ends

234
Item 13.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES

PROCUREMENT DIVISION
Contract Mandatory 1-21-66-03
Contract User Instructions

Page 5 ends

SCOPE
The State’s contract with California Surveying and Drafting Supply, Inc. (Contractor) provides Land Survey Products, Trimble Brand at contracted pricing to the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), the Department of Water Resources (DWR), and participating State and local agencies in accordance with the requirements of Contract # 1- 21-66-03. The Contractor shall supply the entire portfolio of products as identified in the contract and will be the primary point of contact for data collection, reporting, and distribution of Land Survey Products, Trimble Brand to the State.

The contract term is for three (3) years with an option to extend the contract for two (2) additional one (1) year periods or portion thereof. The terms, conditions, and prices for the contract extension option shall be by mutual agreement between the Contractor and the State. If a mutual agreement cannot be met the contract may be terminated at the end of the current contract term.

CONTRACT USAGE/RULES
A. State Departments
 The use of this contract is mandatory for the Caltrans Office of Land Surveys (OLS) and the DWR Geomatic Branch and available for use by other participating State and local agencies. Use of this contract by State departments other than Caltrans OLS and the DWR Geomatic Branch require approval from the State Contract Administrator.
 State departments must adhere to all applicable State laws, regulations, policies, best practices, and purchasing authority requirements, e.g. California Codes, Code of Regulations, State Administrative Manual, Management Memos, and State Contracting Manual Volume 3, as applicable.
 Prior to placing orders against this contract, State departments must have been granted IT purchasing authority by the Department of General Services, Procurement Division (DGS-PD) for the use of this statewide contract. State departments that have not been granted purchasing authority by DGS-PD for the use of the State’s statewide contracts may contact DGS-PD’s Purchasing Authority Management Section by e-mail at [email protected].
 State departments must have a Department of General Services (DGS) agency billing code prior to placing orders against this contract. Ordering departments may contact their Purchasing Authority contact or their department ’s fiscal office to obtain this information.

B. Local Governmental Agencies
 Local governmental agency use of this contract is optional.  Local government agencies are defined in Public Contract Code Chapter 2, Section 10298 (a) (b) and 10299 (b); this includes the California State Universities (CSU) 235
Item 13.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES

PROCUREMENT DIVISION
Contract Mandatory 1-21-66-03
Contract User Instructions

Page 6 ends

and University of California (UC) systems, K-12 schools and community colleges empowered to expend public funds for the acquisition of products While the State makes this contract available to local governmental agencies, each local governmental agency should determine whether this contract is consistent with its procurement policies and regulations.
 Local governmental agencies shall have the same rights and privileges as State departments under the terms of this contract. Any local governmental agencies desiring to participate shall be required to adhere to the same responsibilities as do State departments and have no authority to amend, modify or change any condition of the contract.
 A DGS issued billing code is not required for local governmental agencies to place orders against this contract.

C. Unless otherwise specified within this document, the term “ordering agencies” will refer to all State departments and/or local governmental agencies eligible to utilize this contract. Ordering and/or usage instructions exclusive to State departments or local governmental agencies shall be identified within each article.

DGS ADMINISTRATIVE FEES
A. State Departments
The DGS will bill each State department an administrative fee for use of this statewide contract. The administrative fee should NOT be included in the order total, nor remitted before an invoice is received from DGS.

Current fees are available online in the Price Book & Directory of Services ( https://www.dgs.ca.gov/OFS/Price-Book) (go to Price Book Download and click on Purchasing under Procurement Division).

B. Local Governmental Agencies
For all local government agency transactions issued against the contract , the Contractor is required to remit the DGS-PD an Incentive Fee of an amount equal to

1.25 percent of the total purchase order amount excluding taxes and freight. This Incentive Fee shall not be included in the local governmental agency’s purchase price, nor invoiced or charged to the local governmental agency. All prices quoted to local governmental agencies shall reflect State contract pricing, including any and all applicable discounts, and shall include no other add-on fees.

SB/DVBE OFF-RAMP PROVISION
There is no SB/DVBE off ramp associated with this contract.

EXEMPT PURCHASES
There are no exempt purchases associated with this contract. 236
Item 13.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES

PROCUREMENT DIVISION
Contract Mandatory 1-21-66-03
Contract User Instructions

Page 7 ends

PROBLEM RESOLUTION/SUPPLIER PERFORMANCE
Ordering agencies and/or Contractor shall inform the State Contract Administrator of any technical or contractual difficulties encountered during contract performance in a ti mely manner. This includes and is not limited to informal disputes, supplier performance, outstanding deliveries, etc. The ordering agency should include all relevant information and/or documentation (e.g., purchase documents).

CONTRACT ITEMS
All available line items and associated pricing are listed on Attachment A, Contract Pricing .

SPECIFICATIONS
Core and Non-Core Catalog items are comprised of models from Attachment B – Trimble Geomatic Hardware Price List 7-1-2021 and Attachment B1 – Trimble Software Price List 7-1-2021.

PIVOT PLATFORM SUPPORT LEVEL II
Pivot Platform Support Level II is a maintenance program that supports the Caltrans Real Time Network (RTN). The RTN is a series of GPS receivers that uses Pivot Platform Support Level II to create mathematical corrections for surveyors when collecting points in the field.

Support shall include, but not be limited, to the following:

 Version upgrades to the program
 Technical support
 License updates

The maintenance percentage value is defined as the cost to support Pivot Platform Support Level II based on the total network value. The total network value is the value of the hardware and software of the entire Pivot network utilized by Caltrans and DWR.

CUSTOMER SERVICE
Contractor will provide office and personnel resources for responding to requests, including telephone coverage weekdays during the hours of 8:00 AM through 5:00 PM (PT).

Contact Phone Email
Mike Woodel (916) 344-0232 [email protected]

237
Item 13.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES

PROCUREMENT DIVISION
Contract Mandatory 1-21-66-03
Contract User Instructions

Page 8 ends

ONGOING TECHNICAL SUPPORT
Ongoing Technical Support shall be provided to ordering agencies to resolve issues that affect instrument functionality or interoperability. The technical support shall include, but may not necessarily be limited to, the following:

• Provide assistance in resolving documentation, installation, configuration, and usability issues.
• Diagnose problems and provide workarounds and fixes for known problems. • Diagnose interoperability issues and provide workaround solutions, if possible. • Diagnose new product defects and provide temporary fixes and workarounds, if possible.
• Characterize newly discovered defects, initiate corrective action, and distribute the correction when available.

Contractor will provide a Technical Support contact with appropriate knowledge and training to provide a level of Ongoing Technical Support acceptable to the State and shall be available between 8:00 AM through 5:00 PM (PT), Monday through Friday, excluding State holidays. Support shall be provided by phone and email. Response time shall be by telephone or email contact within two (2) hours. Resolution and notification of resolution for most issues should occur within twenty-four (24) hours. Contractor cannot require the ordering agency to deal directly with the manufacturer

Contact Phone Email
Robert Jones (916) 344-0232 [email protected]

OFFER FORMAT
The Contractor shall provide an offer to ordering agencies in MS Excel spreadsheet format. The authorization process requires submission of the Contractor’s offer format spreadsheet showing company letterhead) which must include the following data elements:
 Contractor letterhead
 Offer/Quote “prepared by” name and contact inf ormation  Offer/Quote number
 Date of Offer/Quote
 Date of the OEM’s publically available price index (MSRP/MSIP)  Ordering agency name
 Ordering agency contact person
 Contract number
 Contract expiration date
238
Item 13.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES

PROCUREMENT DIVISION
Contract Mandatory 1-21-66-03
Contract User Instructions

Page 9 ends

o Table consisting of:
o Contract Line Item Number
o Quantity
o Core/Non-Core (Y/N)
o Description of Item
o Manufacturer’s Part Number/SKU
o MSRP/Index Price
o Contract Discount
o Contract Unit Price
o Extended Price (Quantity x Contract Price)
o Subtotals of taxable and non-taxable items
o Rate and calculated tax
o Applicable fees
o Grand total

PRODUCT SUBSTITUTIONS
Products on Attachment A – Contract Pricing shall be available throughout the duration of the contract term. The contract provides for technology refresh as models are discontinued or cease production and must be approved by the State Contract Administrator. These changes will be made in the form of a contract supplement and will not be effective until the supplement’s release.

The Contractor shall not substitute products or configurations or modify catalog information without written approval from the State Contract Administrator.

The Contractor will maintain the contract discount as bid throughout the original term of the contract and any extensions, including upon approved substitution.

If no substitute product is available to replace the line items on Attachment A – Contract Pricing due to fundamental technology or market change, the State may alter the common configurations to meet the updated marketplace standards. Obsolescence of line items may be determined at the discretion of the State.

Items with the same model number or SKU available elsewhere on the contract shall be made available to the State at the highest discount.

PROMOTIONAL PRICING
The Contractor shall immediately notify the State Contract Administrator of all manufacturer’s price declines. Ordering agencies shall receive full benefit of such declines, effective on the date of manufacturer’s public announcement.

PURCHASE EXECUTION
A. State Departments
239
Item 13.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES

PROCUREMENT DIVISION
Contract Mandatory 1-21-66-03
Contract User Instructions

Page 10 ends

1) Std. 65 Purchase Documents
State departments not transacting in FI$CAL must use the Purchasing Authority Purchase Order (Std. 65) for purchase execution. An electronic version of the Std. 65 is available at the Office of State Publishing web site ( https://www.dgsapps.dgs.ca.gov/osp/StatewideFormsWeb/Forms.aspx) (select STD Forms).

All Purchasing Authority Purchase Orders (Std. 65) must contain the following:
 Agency Order Number (Purchase Order Number)
 Ordering Agency Name
 Agency Billing Code
 Purchasing Authority Number
 Leveraged Procurement Number (Contract Number)
 Supplier Information (Contact Name, Address, Phone Number, Fax Number, E-mail)
 Line Item number
 Quantity
 Unit of Measure
 Commodity Code Number
 Product Description
 Unit Price
 Extension Price

2) FI$CAL Purchase Documents
State departments transacting in FI$CAL will follow the FI$CAL procurement and contracting procedures.
3) Blanket Orders
The use of blanket purchase orders against this statewide contract is not allowed.

B. Local Governmental Agencies
Local governmental agencies may use their own purchase document for purchase execution. The purchase documents must include the same data elements as listed above (Exception: Purchasing Authority Number and Billing Code which are used by State departments only).

MINIMUM ORDER
There is no minimum order for this contract.

240
Item 13.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES

PROCUREMENT DIVISION
Contract Mandatory 1-21-66-03
Contract User Instructions

Page 11 ends

ORDERING PROCEDURE
Ordering agencies are to submit appropriate purchase documents directly to the Contractor via one of the following ordering methods:
 U.S. Mail
 Facsimile
 Email
The Contractor’s Order Placement Information is as follows:

ORDER PLACEMENT INFORMATION
U.S. Mail:

California Surveying &
Drafting Supply, Inc.
4733 Auburn Blvd.

Sacramento, CA 95841
Facsimile:
(916) 344-2998
Email:
[email protected]
When using any of the ordering methods specified above, all State departments must conform to proper State procedures.

ORDER ACCEPTANCE
The Contractor shall accept orders from Caltrans OLS, DWR Geometrics Branch, and local government agencies. The Contractor shall not accept purchase documents for this contract that:
 Are incomplete
 Contain non-contract items
 Contain non-contract terms and conditions
 State departments that do not have DGS-PD approval to utilize this contract.

The Contractor must not refuse to accept orders from approved State departments and local government agencies for any other reason without written authorization from the State Contract Administrator.

ORDER RECEIPT CONFIRMATION
The Contractor will provide ordering agencies with an email or facsimile order receipt confirmation within two (2) business days of receipt of purchase document. The Order Receipt Confirmation shall include the following information:
 Ordering agency name
 Agency order number (purchase order number)
 Purchase order total cost
 Anticipated delivery date
241
Item 13.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES

PROCUREMENT DIVISION
Contract Mandatory 1-21-66-03
Contract User Instructions

Page 12 ends

OUT OF STOCK REMEDY
Upon receipt of an order acknowledgment identifying out of stock items, the ordering agencies shall have the following options:
 Request a back order
 Cancel the item from the order with no penalty
The Contractor will provide notification to the ordering agencies regarding out-of-stock items which have been back ordered.

Under no circumstance is the Contractor permitted to make substitutions with non -contract items or unauthorized products.

DISCONTINUED ITEM REMEDY
Upon receipt of an order acknowledgment identifying discontinued items, the ordering agencies shall have the following options:
 Amend purchase document to reflect State-approved substitute item (per Article 13, Product Substitutions)
 Cancel the item from the order
Under no circumstance is the Contractor permitted to make substitutions with non -contract items or unauthorized products without approval from the State Contract Administrator.

DELIVERY SCHEDULES
Delivery for orders placed against this contract shall be in accordance with the following:

A. Locations
Deliveries to Caltrans are to be made to:

California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) Division of Right of Way and Land Surveys
Office of Land Surveys
1727 30th Street, MS-35
Sacramento, CA 95816
Deliveries to DWR are to be made to:

California Department of Water Resources
Division of Engineering – Geomatics Branch - Field Surveys 3500 Industrial Blvd, RM 163
West Sacramento, CA 95691
Office: 916-376-9863 Cell: 916-862-2166
242
Item 13.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES

PROCUREMENT DIVISION
Contract Mandatory 1-21-66-03
Contract User Instructions

Page 13 ends

B. Schedule
Delivery of ordered product shall be completed in full within thirty (30) calendar daysafter receipt of an order (ARO). Since receiving hours for each ordering agency will vary by facility, it will be the Contractor’s responsibility to check with each ordering agency for their specific delivery hours before delivery occurs. The Contractor must notify the ordering agency within twelve (12) hours of scheduled delivery time, if delivery cannot be made within the time frame specified on the Order Rec eipt Confirmation.

The Contractor is requested to make deliveries in Los Angeles County, Orange County, San Bernardino Metropolitan Area, and San Diego Metropolitan Area during off-peak hours. Off-peak hours are Monday through Friday, 10:00 AM to 4:00 PM PT.

C. Security Requirements
Deliveries may be made to locations inside secure grounds that require approvals to be made for delivery drivers. The Contractor will be responsible for contacting the secure location for procedures, hours of operation for deliveries, and rules of delivery.

Deliveries that are delayed due to drivers not being cleared to enter secrured grounds may be cause for contract default.

FREE ON BOARD (F.O.B.) DESTINATION
All prices are F.O.B. destination, freight prepaid by the Contractor, to the ordering agency’s receiving point. Responsibility and liability for loss or damage for all orders will remain with the Contractor until final inspection and acceptance, when all responsibility will pass to the ordering agency, except the responsibility for latent defects, fraud, and the warranty obligations.

SHIPPED ORDERS
All shipments shall be in accordance with the IT General Provisions (rev 09/05/2014), paragraph 12 entitled “Packing and Shipment”.

PACKING SLIP
Packing slip requirements shall be in accordance with the IT General Provisions (rev 09/05/2014), paragraph 12 entitled “Packing and Shipment”.

INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE
Inspection and acceptance shall be in accordance with the IT General Provisions (rev 09/05/2014), paragraph 16 titled Inspection, Acceptance and Rejection.

243
Item 13.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES

PROCUREMENT DIVISION
Contract Mandatory 1-21-66-03
Contract User Instructions

Page 14 ends

CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION
Both the State and the Contractor have assigned contract administrators as the single points of contact for problem resolution and related contract issues .

Administrator
Information DGS-PD California Surveying and
Drafting Supply, Inc.

Contact
Name:

Sarah Samaan Tom Cardenas
Telephone: (916) 375-4432 (916) 344-0232
Facsimile: (916) 375-4613 (916) 344-2998
Email: [email protected] [email protected]
Address: DGS/Procurement Division
Attn: Sarah Samaan
707 Third Street, 2nd Floor, MS
201
West Sacramento, CA 95605
California Surveying and
Drafting Supply, Inc.

Attn: Tome Cardenas
4733 Auburn Blvd.

Sacramento, CA 95841

RETURN POLICY
Contractor will accept all products for return if returned prior to acceptance by the State in accordance with Article 26, Inspection and Acceptance. Contractor shall offer a credit or refund in accordance with Article 29, Credit Policy. Contractor will not impose a restocking fee in accordance with Article 30, Restocking Fees.

Products returned should be in the packaging as delivered and include all documentation.

Lost or damaged packaging materials and/or documentation shall be supplied by the Contractor. The Contractor shall not charge for these materials in excess of the Contractor’s cost or the restocking fee, in accordance with Article 30, Restocking Fee, whichever is lower. The Contractor shall provide the State Contract Administrator and/or ordering department a copy of the Contractor’s material cost, if requested, within ten (10) working days of request.

All returns shall be picked up within seven (7) working days of notification. Notification is defined as notice in writing, by facsimile or e-mail. Shipping or freight costs for returned items that were shipped in error, defective or freight-damaged shall be paid by the Contractor.

CREDIT POLICY
The Contractor shall offer a full credit/refund for the following items:
 Items shipped in error
 Defective or freight-damaged items
 Items that are not accepted (within fifteen (15) calendar days of delivery) 244
Item 13.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES

PROCUREMENT DIVISION
Contract Mandatory 1-21-66-03
Contract User Instructions

Page 15 ends

All other items returned in accordance with Article 28, Return Policy, shall receive credit or refund, less any applicable restocking fees in accordance with Article 30, Restocking Fees.

In all cases, the ordering agency shall have the option of taking an exchange, receiving a credit, or receiving a refund.

The Contractor will be responsible for the credit/refund or replacement of all products, including those covered by manufacturer warranties as stated in Article 35, Warranty.

Contractor cannot require the ordering agency to deal directly with the manufacturer

RESTOCKING FEES
The Contractor will not impose a restocking fee on the ordering agency.

INVOICING
Ordering agencies may require separate invoicing, as specified by each ordering agency.

Invoices will contain the following information:

 Contractor’s name, address and telephone number
 Contract Number
 Purchase Order Number
 Line Item Number
 Quantity purchased
 Contract Unit Price and Extension
 State sales and/or use tax
 Prompt payment discounts/cash discounts, if applicable  Totals for each order

PAYMENT
A. Terms
Payment terms for this contract are net forty-five (45) days. Payment will be made in accordance with the provisions of the California Prompt Payment Act, Government Code Section 927, et seq. Unless expressly exempted by statute, the Act requires State departments to pay properly submitted, undisputed invoices not more than forty- five (45) days after the date of acceptance of goods, performance of services, or receipt of an undisputed invoice, whichever is later.

B. CAL-Card Use
State departments may use the CAL-Card for the payment of invoices. Use of the CAL-Card requires the execution of a Purchasing Authority Purchase Order (Std. 65) in accordance with Article15, Purchase Execution and must include all required documentation applicable to the purchase.
245
Item 13.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES

PROCUREMENT DIVISION
Contract Mandatory 1-21-66-03
Contract User Instructions

Page 16 ends

The CAL-Card is a payment mechanism, not a procurement approach and, therefore, does not relieve State departments from adhering to all procurement laws, regulations, policies, procedures, and best practices, including those discussed in the State Contracting Manual (SCM) Volume 1 and Volume 2. This includes but is not limited to the application of all sales and use tax laws, rules and policies as applicable to the purchase.

C. State Financial Marketplace
State departments reserve the right to select the form of payment for all procurements, be it either an outright purchase with payment rendered directly by the State, or a financing/lease-purchase or operating lease via the State Financial Marketplace (GS $Mart and/or Lease $Mart). If payment is via the financial marketplace, the Contractor will invoice the State department and the State department will approve the invoice and the selected Lender/Lessor for all product listed on the State's procurement document will pay the Contractor on behalf of the State.

D. Payee Data Record
Each State department’s accounting office must have a copy of the Contractor’s Payee Data Record (Std. 204) in order to process payments. State departments should forward a copy of the Std. 204 to their accounting offices. Without the Std. 204, payment may be unnecessarily delayed.

CAL-CARD INVOICING
All CAL-Card invoices are to be processed separately from other payment methods and include the elements identified in Article 31, Invoicing. CAL-Card invoices shall be submitted to the CAL-Card account holder. The total invoice amount for each CAL-Card order must reflect a zero (0) balance due or credit, if applicable, and state “paid by CAL- Card”.

This website contains additional information regarding DGS-PD’s CAL-Card program ( https://www.dgs.ca.gov/PD/Services/Page-Content/Procurement-Division-Services-List- Folder/Enroll-in-CAL-Card-Program-for-Government-Entities).

CALIFORNIA SELLER’S PERMIT
The California seller permit number for the Contractor is listed below. Ordering Agencies can verify that permits are currently valid at the following website: www.cdtfa.ca.gov .

State departments must adhere to the file documentation identified in the State Contracting Manual Volume 3.

Contractor Name Seller Permit #
California Surveying and
Drafting Supply, Inc. 028805258

246
Item 13.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES

PROCUREMENT DIVISION
Contract Mandatory 1-21-66-03
Contract User Instructions

Page 17 ends

WARRANTY
The Contractor must honor all manufacturers’ warranties and guarantees for a period of one (1) year from the date of acceptance on all products offered as part of this contract. If the manufacturer offers a longer warranty period, the contractor shall ensure the longer warranty is transferred to the State so that the State receives the full benefit of said warranty as offered by the manufacturer. The Contractor shall bear all material and labor costs for repair of equipment defects and failure. The Contractor shall be the main point of contact for all warranty issues and shall facilitate any necessary contact between the ordering agency and the manufacturer.

During the warranty period, the Contractor must:
 Honor all manufacturers’ warranties and guarantees on all products offered through the contract.
 Continue to provide warranty service after contract termination until expiration of warranties for products that have been sold under the contract.  Provide all labor, parts, and travel necessary to keep the products in good operating condition and preserve its operating efficiency in accordance with its technical specifications.
 Pay any necessary shipment and insurance costs.

The warranty services listed shall include all products, software and firmware maintenance costs and costs of labor, parts, travel, factory overhaul, rehabilitation, transportation, and substitute products as necessary.

Substitute products will be comparable to or better than the products removed. In instances where it is necessary for the Contractor to return the products to the factory, the Contractor will be responsible for all costs of the products from the time it leaves the authorized purchaser’s site until it is returned to the site in good operating condition.

Only new standard parts or parts equal in performance to new parts will be used in effecting repairs. Parts that have been replaced will become the prope rty of the Contractor. Replacement parts installed will become the property of the authorized purchaser.

All operating system software and firmware will be considered an integral component of the equipment and the Contractor will respond to all requests f or warranty service for any failure.

Warranty services during the warranty period will not include electrical work external to the products, the furnishing of supplies, or adding or removing accessories, attachments, or other devices not provided under this contract. Warranty services also will not include repair of damage resulting from transportation by the authorized purchaser between ordering agencies sites or from accident.
247
Item 13.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES

PROCUREMENT DIVISION
Contract Mandatory 1-21-66-03
Contract User Instructions

Page 18 ends

EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT DURING WARRANTY
If a product provided fails to perform in accordance with technical specifications and functional descriptions contained or referenced in the awarded contract agreement and is subject to warranty response three (3) or more times during any ninety (90) day period, the Contractor will, upon the authorized purchaser’s request, replace the product at no cost.

The replacement product will be delivered no later than fifteen (15) working days after the authorized purchaser’s request is received by the Contractor. Replacement goods cannot be used, refurbished, or recycled and must be of equal or greater value.

LOANER EQUIPMENT
If the equipment takes more than two (2) business days for repair to be completed, the Contractor may need to provide a loaner/replacement device that meets or exceeds the specification of the replaced product. All loaner/replacement equipment shall be provided at no cost to the State or local agency.

RECYCLED CONTENT
There is no recycled content associated with this contract.

SB/DVBE PARTICIPATION
There is no Small Business (SB) or Disabled Veteran Business Enterprise (DVBE) participation for this contract.

BIDDER DECLARATION/COMMERCIALLY USEFUL FUNCTION (CUF)
The DGS-PD, as the awarding department, has assessed the Contractor and subcontractor certifications and CUF during the solicitation evaluation process.

Consequently, when executing purchase documents pursuant to this contract, it is not necessary for State departments operating under statewide contract purchasing authority to request the completion of a Bidder Declaration document or perform additional CUF analysis. The State department should make a notation of this within their procurement file.

ATTACHMENTS
Attachment A – Contract Pricing
Attachment B – Trimble Geomatic Hardware Price List 7-1-2021 Attachment B1 – Trimble Software Price List 7-1-2021

248
Item 13.

Staff Report

TO: City Council
FROM: Jeff Hart, Public Works Director
DATE February 15, 2022
SUBJECT: Procedure for Addressing Public Requests for Traffic Related Safety Concerns

Background and Analysis:

City staff receives various requests from the public for traffic related safety concerns.

These requests are often for increased enforcement, additional signage, installation of stop signs, installation of traffic signals and several other common issues. In an effort to equitably address these concerns City staff developed a procedure for handling requests (see Attachment A).

City staff is seeking approval of the attached procedure for addressing public requests for traffic related safety concerns for immediate implementation.

Fiscal Impact:

The cost associated with preparing this staff report is $1,500.

Recommended Action:

Approve the procedure for addressing public requests for traffic related safety concerns.

Attachments:

A. Traffic Request Procedure
249
Item 14.

Public Request Regarding Traffic Safety Concerns

There is a variety of traffic safety concerns, particularly in residential neighborhoods that stem from increased traffic volume and higher speeds. The best solutions for resolving traffic safety concerns often come from effective partnership among residents, law enforcement, school officials, traffic engineers, and City representatives. The process involves:
 Request/Petition - A written request/petition for residents or community groups.  Evaluation - Traffic studies including field reviews, data analysis, preliminary recommendations, and design.
 Response - A response from the City to the resident or community group explaining the results and to discuss solutions.
 Implementation - Installation and implementation.
 Review - Follow-up performance review.

The following is additional information for the above process:

Request/Petition
The City is committed to working together with the community to identify traffic safety concerns and implement appropriate and effective traffic control devices. A resident or community group can submit a request/petition to the City to evaluate a traffic safety concern through the City’s website www.beaumontca.gov in three different ways:
o Under the “How do I…” heading, then select the “Public Service Request” option. Once completed, the request is sent directly to Public Works. o Through the “Report a Concern” icon on the City’s home page. o Through the Beaumont Police Department page under “Traffic & Parking Concerns.” The request must be in writing, however, Public Works is available to discuss the concern and answer questions at (951) 769-8522. The request is processed in order of receipt. City staff is continually processing requests and collecting field data. Based on staff level, equipment, and request volume, the request should be evaluated within 2 months or less.

Evaluation
The request will receive an initial evaluation to determine the significance of the request and potential measures. Some of the measures may include:
 Enforcement,
 Traffic signs and markings,
 Stop signs,
 Traffic signals, and
 Traffic signal modifications (e.g., timing, protected movements, etc.)

250
Item 14.

The consistent application of traffic control devices or measures is essential in maintaining traffic safety.

Any given measure for the control of traffic should have the same meaning and require the same action on the part of motorist regardless of where it is encountered. The California Penal Code (CPC), the California Vehicle Code (CVC), and the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD) govern how the City implements traffic control devices and measures. Subsequently, each traffic control device has specific requirements, warrants, and guidelines that must be met for the respective device to be considered.

The following is a brief explanation of the criteria for the listed measures and how they are evaluated:

Enforcement
Speeding laws and other vehicle operation laws are enforced by the Beaumont Police Department (BPD). Public Works may assist BPD by collecting field data including: 85th percentile speed, traffic speed statistics, and times where peak violations occur.

All enforcement related measures are resolved exclusively by BPD.

Traffic Signs and Markings
Speed limit signs remind the motorist to drive within the established speed limit. Unnecessary signs often confuse and annoy drivers and tend to foster lack of adherence for other appropriate traffic signs.

Well-placed signs in accordance with CA MUTCD criteria can be highly effective in reducing speeds and increasing traffic safety.

The CVC sets the following speed limits:
 15 mph in alleys, at blind intersections, and blind railroad crossings; and  25 mph in residential and business districts, school zones, playground areas when children are present, and at senior citizen facilitiesThese speed limits may be posted or unposted.

Speed limits may also be established by an engineering and traffic survey. This survey determines an appropriate speed limit considering factors such as the type of adjacent development, pedestrian and bicycle activity, roadside conditions, reported collision history, and the prevailing speed of traffic. The prevailing speed is that speed which 85 percent of the motorists are traveling at or below. The prevailing speed is utilized as a reference to establish speed limits based on the concept that most motorists can be relied upon to drive at a reasonable speed. Studies have shown that setting arbitrarily low speed limits results in wholesale violations and does not necessarily result in lower driving speeds.

City staff performs the engineering and traffic survey by installing radar at the location of concern and collecting a minimum of 24-hours of traffic data. The data is analyzed by a registered civil engineer to determine the 85th percentile.

251
Item 14.

Stop Signs
Stop signs are not intended to reduce speeding. Generally, stop signs are installed at intersections where conflicting traffic volumes are high enough to require control, or where there is a high incidence of collisions correctable by a stop.

Stop signs help drivers and pedestrians establish right-of-way at intersections. The justification for stop sign installation is determined by the CA MUTCD "warrants," or guidelines. These warrants consider:
 The number of vehicles and pedestrians entering the intersection during a substantial part of the day,
 The prevailing speed of traffic,
 The amount of time traffic must wait to enter the intersection, including the availability of safe crossing opportunities, and
 Collision patterns susceptible of correction by stop control.

Stop signs installed at locations that do not satisfy the above warrants may produce negative consequences such as:
 Unnecessary traffic congestion and delay,
 Motorist frustration and the temptation to not completely stop or disobey the stop signs,  An increase in the potential for rear-end collisions,  Added noise and pollution for nearby residents as vehicles stop and accelerate, and  An intersection that previously appeared "not busy," may now look like a major intersection.

Public works staff evaluates the warrants by installing radar at multiple locations around the primary location of concern and collects a minimum of 24-hours of traffic data at each location. Since the warrants require multiple locations, the field data collection occurs over a five-to-ten-day duration. The data is analyzed by a registered civil engineer against the warrants to determine if the primary location “meets warrants” or “does not meet warrants”.

Traffic Signals
Traffic signals are not intended to reduce speeding. Generally, traffic signals are installed at intersections where conflicting traffic volumes are high enough to require control, or where there is a high incidence of collisions correctable by signalization. Traffic signals provide for the orderly movement of vehicles and pedestrians by:
 Increasing the traffic handling capacity of the intersection,  Reducing the frequency of certain types of accidents, especially the right angle type (broadside),  Providing for the efficient and orderly movement of traffic, and  Providing for minor street traffic to enter or cross the major street with less delay or risk of accidents.

The justification for installing traffic signals is based on CA MUTCD “warrants,” or guidelines, and considers factors such as:
 The number of vehicles and pedestrian entering the intersection during a substantial part of the day,
252
Item 14.

 The prevailing speed of traffic,
 Schools in the vicinity,
 The amount of time traffic must wait to enter the intersection, including the availability of safe crossing opportunities, and
 Any accident patterns susceptible of correction by traffic signals.

City staff evaluates the warrants by installing radar at multiple locations around the primary location in question and collects a minimum of 24-hours of traffic data at each location. Since the warrants require multiple locations, the field data collection occurs over a five-to-ten-day duration. The data is analyzed by a registered civil engineer against the warrants to determine if the primary location “meets warrants” or “does not meet warrants”.

Traffic Signal Modification
Traffic signal modification uses the same warrants and evaluation as traffic signals.

Response
The City will contact the resident or community group by phone to discuss the request, initial evaluation, field data, final evaluation, and results. There are usually several options available to improve traffic and pedestrian safety when a significant traffic concern exists. However, in some cases, the results do not meet the warrants. It is important to understand that the City cannot arbitrarily implement a traffic control device or measure.

Implementation
If the traffic control device or measure is warranted, the City will start the process of implementation.

Depending on the device or measure, funding availability, and staff availability, the process can take as little as a few days or as long as few years. The following is an approximate guideline for the duration:
 Enforcement –specified by BPD on a case-by-case basis,  Traffic signs and markings – one to eight weeks,
 Stop sign – one to six months,
 Traffic signal – one to two years, and
 Traffic signal modification – six months to two years.

Review
The City will re-evaluate the implementation to verify the intended result was achieved. If the device is underperforming the City may make modifications or install an additional device or measure. The City will not contact the resident or community group with the results of the final evaluation unless specifically requested to do so.
253
Item 14.

Staff Report

TO: City Council
FROM: Christina Taylor, Community Development Director
DATE February 15, 2022
SUBJECT: Food Trucks and Motorized, Mobile Food Vendor Standards

Background and Analysis:

On December 7, 2021, a discussion was held and City staff received direction from City Council regarding the development of regulations for food trucks and other motorized, mobile food vendors. Based on that direction, City staff has prepared draft language addressing the following concerns:
 Licensing and permitting,
 Operation standards:
o General,
o Private property,
o Public property, and
 Term, renewal and revocation.

Previous points of discussion centered around location of operation and operational standards for food trucks. The draft language includes extensive standards for both location and operations. The key points of discussion are:

1. Location options:
 Allowed to operate on public streets if approved through a special event permit,  Allowed on public property subject to a special event permit,  Allowed on private property subject to a special event permit,  Allowed to operate on public street if in a legal parking space, and  Allowed to operate on public street for a maximum of 4 hours.

2. Operational Standards:

An extensive list of operation standards is included in the draft language but a few of the previously discussed standards are:
254
Item 15.

 Partnering with an existing bar or brewery,
 Providing proof of sellers permit (tax tracking),
 Health certificate,
 No canopies or seating,
 Quarterly inspections, and
 Waste disposal.

One item not previously discussed in detail is length of time or number of days, for an independent food truck operation (not part of an approved event). Length of time of operation could range from annual approval to specified hours at certain locations. This would need to be called out should an ordinance be drafted.

City staff recommends that in addition to a business license, food truck operations be subject to special event permit review and approval. The requirements for a special event permit are codified in Chapter 9 of the Beaumont Municipal Code and require a much more detailed application submittal and staff review process than a temporary use permit. This process allows City staff to review all components of an operation including location, size and scope of setup, hours of operation, length of operation at a location and anticipated crowd. The special event application also provides for multi - departmental review, conditions and sign-off of a proposal if needed.

Another item of discussion is the fee for service. The special event application is a free application. There is no cost recovery for any City staff time spent reviewing these applications. The Planning fee schedule provides for cost recovery of City staff time directly based on the time spent on an item or through a miscellaneous application (all requests not otherwise specified) fee of $1,195. City staff recommends establishing a flat fee specifically for food truck special event applications or utilizing the miscellaneous application provision.

At City Council’s direction, any or all of the items in the draft language can be used to create a new code section in the Beaumont Municipal Code. City staff can coordinate with the City Attorney’s office to review and ensure compliance with any applicable laws and regulations. The adoption process would entail publishing a public notice, holding a public hearing at Planning Commission in March, a first reading at City Council in April followed by a second reading.

Fiscal Impact:

The cost to prepare this staff report is approximately $1,000. 255
Item 15.

Recommended Action:

Hold discussion and provide direction to staff on preparing an ordinance for the regulation of food trucks.

Attachments:

A. Draft language for regulation of food trucks
B. Special Event Permit Application
256
Item 15.

Food Trucks
Purpose
The purpose of this chapter is to regulate motorized, mobile vendors (food truck) activities in order to promote public health, safety and welfare while providing an opportunity for a variety of business activities in a non-traditional manner. The city council hereby finds that, to promote the health, safety and welfare, restrictions on motorized, mobile food vendor (food trucks) activity are necessary in part to:

1. Ensure no interference with the performance of public safety officers.

2. Ensure no interference with pedestrian or vehicular traffic.

3. Ensure the safe sale of food and merchandise by providing the public a simple way to ensure food truck operators prepare food safely and according to Riverside Department of Public Health requirements.

4. Prevent unsanitary conditions and ensure trash and debris in the areas vending is taking place are removed by food truck operators.

5. Ensure reasonable access for the use and maintenance of the public right-of-way.

Intent
It is unlawful for any person to sell or offer for sale, or conduct business from any vehicle parked, stopped or standing on any public street, alley, parkway, sidewalk or other public property in the city except in accordance with all applicable requirements of this code and the provisions of the Beaumont Municipal Code.

Definitions
The following words, terms and phrases when used in this chapter shall have the meanings ascribed to them in this section. If a term or phrase is not defined in this part, or elsewhere in this Code, the most common dictionary definition is presumed to be correct.

Building means a structure of a permanent nature located or constructed on a parcel of land, and shall include but not be restricted to, dwelling, hotel, apartment house, apartment, court, rooming house, boarding home for the aged, motel, cottage, house trailer, commercial establishment, store, office, plant, factory, warehouse and similar buildings.

Business license means a City of Beaumont business license.

City means City of Beaumont
Food means any item provided in Health and Safety Code § 113781, or any successor section.

Food truck shall mean any motorized device or vehicle by which any person or property may be propelled or moved upon a highway, or which may be drawn or towed by a motorized vehicle, from which food or food products are sold, offered for sale, displayed, bartered, exchanged or otherwise 257
Item 15.

given. This definition shall exclude sidewalk vendors as defined in Beaumont Municipal Code Chapter

5.66 Sidewalk Vending.

Food truck event shall mean an organized gathering of food truck vendors which is open to the general public.

Immediate vicinity means the streets abutting an activity or event (and any contiguous parking areas), the sidewalks on either side of such streets, as well as any open or unoccupied space between the activity or event and the abutting streets and sidewalks.

Park means a public park owned or operated by the city.

Property owner shall mean the holder of fee title to a property, whether a person, partnership, corporation or other entity recognized by law, and his/her/its lessees, permittees, assignees or successors in interest.

Public property shall mean any real property owned, leased, operated, or controlled by the City of Perris other than a street, alley, parkway, sidewalk or other area dedicated, identified or used as a public right- of-way.

Public right-of-way shall mean any public street, road, avenue, highway, named or unnamed alley, lane, court, place, trail, parkway, sidewalk or other public way, operated and/or controlled by the city or other public entity, or subject to an easement owned by or dedicated or granted to the city.

Residential means any area zoned or used exclusively as residential in the city.

Special event means any temporary event, as further described herein, not exceeding thirty days whether indoors or outdoors, or on improved or unimproved public or private property, which is inconsistent with the permanent use to which the property may legally be put, or the occupancy levels permitted thereon. Special event shall also refer to any activity that may result in the closure of any public streets, or any activities which may temporarily require the installation of materials or devices using building, electrical, mechanical, plumbing, flammable or similar materials. Special events may include, but are not limited to, short-term events such as any show, circus, concert, festival, carnival, dance open to the public, exhibition, lecture, auction, rave, boxing match, wrestling match, walk-a-thon, marathon run, cycling event, sporting event, permitted film production event, farmers' market, pumpkin patch, outdoor sales, including, but not limited to, vehicle sales, or any combination thereof which members of the public are invited for free or admitted for a fee. All special events shall be classified under one of the following categories:

1. "Major special events" shall mean those events that impact multiple departments within the City and (a) have participation by 500 or more persons, or (b) will result in the closure of a City roadway, street, right-of-way, or highway, or more than 50 percent of a City park (i.e., carnivals, parades, festivals, car races, marathon events, street fairs).

2."Minor special events" shall mean those events that impact multiple City departments and (a) have participation by less than 500 persons, or (b) will have an impact on City rights-of-way (i.e., 5K/10K races, bicycle rides, boxing matches, block parties, grand openings). 258
Item 15.

3."Miscellaneous special events" means those events which impact only one City department, including, but not limited to, the following departments:
a. Community Services
b. Police Department
c. Community Services; or
d. Fire Department.

Permit and License Required
No person shall conduct a food truck operation within the City of Beaumont, without first obtaining a business license and special event permit from the City pursuant to this chapter and the provisions of the Beaumont Municipal Code Chapter 9.03 Regulation of Special Events and Title 5 Business, Taxes, Licenses and Regulations, except in the following situations:

1. No special event permit shall be required when the food truck activity is associated with the operation of a city-permitted special event, subject to the conditions thereof.

The following requirements must be provided to the City prior to issuance of the business license and special event permit:

1. A copy of the county health permit for each food truck operating in the City.

2. Proof that the food truck operator possesses a valid California Department of Tax and Fee Administration seller's permit which notes the city as a location or sublocation, which shall be maintained for the duration of the operator's food truck permit.

3. Proof of public liability insurance and property damage insurance, including general commercial liability coverage in an amount not less than $1,000,000.00.

A. A copy of the business license and special event permit shall be displayed in conspicuous view, on each food truck, at all times while business is conducted.

B. Business licenses and special event permits are non-transferable. Any change in ownership or operation of a food truck requires a new business license and special event permit as set forth in this chapter.

Health Permit Required
It is unlawful for any person to engage in the activity of operating a food truck in the City of Beaumont without a valid permit, certificate, or other authorization as required by the County of Riverside Department of Environmental Health. A copy of said permit shall be kept in the food truck and shall be visible at all times. All food products sold or provided from a food truck shall comply with all applicable food labeling requirements established by the State of California. a. Quarterly inspections of all food trucks operating in the City shall be required to verify business license, health department permit and special event permit validity. 259
Item 15.

b. More than three reports of food borne illness are grounds for revocation of the business license and special event permit.

General Operational Standards for Food Trucks

1. Food trucks shall not operate on public streets unless approved by a special event permit.

2. Food trucks shall not operate in residential areas as defined in this chapter.

3. No food truck shall operate within 500 feet of a restaurant located within a building.

4. No food truck shall operate within 500 feet of any off-street food truck event or city-permitted special event or activity.

5. No operator shall operate within one block of a school, park, community center or public playground facility; provided, however, that operation at or near a city park is permissible when it has been approved by the city in conjunction with an approved special event.

6. No operator shall permit the food truck to vend within 100 feet of a marked or unmarked crosswalk.

7. Food trucks shall not operate on any undeveloped lot within the city except as part of a city- permitted special event.

8. No food truck shall operate before 6:00 a.m. or after 12:00 a.m., including setup and clean-up, except as approved by a special event permit.

9. The operation shall comply at all times with the City’s Noise Ordinance, Chapter 9.02, of the Beaumont Municipal Code.

10. No temporary lighting shall be provided on the site where the food truck is operating, except that localized lighting may be used on or in the food trucks for the purpose of inside food preparation and menu illumination.

11. No signage other than that exhibited on the food truck may be displayed at the site where the food truck is operating. The prohibition shall include any handheld signage, handbills or flyers.

12. No sales or service of alcohol shall be permitted.

13. Food trucks shall provide refuse and recycling containers during all hours of food truck operations. Food truck operators shall remove all refuse and refuse containers upon the close of operation daily for disposal or more frequently if needed.

14. Food truck operations shall consist only of service from the food truck itself. No canopies, tables, chairs or other accommodations shall be allowed unless approved as part of a special event permit.

15. The food truck operator shall properly dispose of solids or liquids consistent with applicable law, and shall not dispose of solids or liquids by discharging such solids or liquids into the public right-of-way or storm drains.
260
Item 15.

a. Proof of a recycling, dump receipt or haul-off receipt shall be provided at the required quarterly inspection.

Food Trucks on Private Property
The following standards apply to food truck operations on private property and are in addition to the general operational standards included in this chapter:

1. Food trucks may operate on private properties pursuant to approval of a special event permit and the following additional minimum standards and conditions:

2. The food truck must be parked entirely on paved portions of the private property.

3. A minimum of two off-street parking spaces shall be provided for each food truck. The parking required herein shall not be reserved, encumbered, or designated to satisfy the off-street parking of another business or activity that is operating on the site at the same time as the food truck.

4. Additional separate refuse and recycling containers shall be provided on-site during all hours of food truck operations. Food truck operators shall remove all refuse and refuse containers upon the close of operation daily for disposal or more frequently if needed.

5. No overnight parking of food trucks shall be allowed on the permitted vending site located on the private property.

6. Uncovered seating area may be provided to serve patrons of the food truck on private property. All seating areas shall be removed prior to close of business for the day. The seating shall be located in an area of the site that is not landscaped, reserved, encumbered, or designated to satisfy the off-street parking of a business or activity that is operating at the same time as the food truck, and shall not obstruct any pedestrian or vehicular traffic or impede line of sight.

Food Trucks on Public Right-of-Way
The following standards apply to food truck operations in the public right-of-way and are in addition to the general operational standards included in this chapter:

1. Food trucks may only operate on a public right-of-way while parked in a legal parking space.

2. Food trucks shall be parked directly adjacent to a paved sidewalk, free and clear for pedestrian passage.

3. Food service shall be limited solely to that side of the food truck facing the adjacent sidewalk.

No food truck may dispense food street side.

4. No food truck may operate on the same block for longer than four hours. The four-hour time period is cumulative for all time that the food truck is operating on the same block in each 24- hour period and does not start over by moving the food truck to another parking space on the same block or closing the sales window between sales. The four-hour limit does not include set- up or clean-up time, provided that the food truck is not vending or not ready to serve customers during set-up or clean-up.
261
Item 15.

Fees
Fees will have to be established for this process or billed at the cost of staff time Term and Renewal
All special event permits are subject to the terms of approval at the time of issuance. Any modification to the special event permit shall require a new special event permit to be filled. Business license term and renewal are subject to Title 5 Business Taxes, Licenses and Regulations of the Beaumont Municipal Code.

Revocation
Any food truck permit may be revoked by the city manager, or the city manager's designee for good cause shown including but not necessarily limited to any of the following reasons:
a. Citation for operator's third or subsequent violation of the requirements set forth in this article.
b. Falsification of any information supplied by the food truck operator upon which issuance of the food truck permit was based.
c. Failure of the food truck operator, or any employees or subcontractors of the operator, to comply with the regulations set forth in this article.
d. Conviction of a violation, or plea of guilty or nolo contendere, by the food truck operator, or any employee, subcontractor or independent contractor of the permittee, of any federal or state law, or municipal ordinance while in the course of conducting food truck activity pursuant to the food truck permit.
e. Conviction of a violation, or a plea of guilty or nolo contendere, by the food truck operator of any applicable provision or requirement of this section. f. Conviction of, or a plea of guilty or nolo contendere, by the food truck operator of any misdemeanor, or conspiracy to commit, or attempt to commit, the same, which is a crime of moral turpitude or a crime that is violent or sexual in nature, as defined by state and/or local law.
g. No food truck operator whose food truck permit is revoked shall be eligible to apply for a new food truck permit for a period of one year following such revocation.

In the event of a food truck operator who owns more than one truck, the revocation shall apply to the food truck permit for each truck.

Revocation of a business license is subject to the provisions in Title 5 Business Taxes, Licenses and Regulations of the Beaumont Municipal Code.

Appeals
Appeal of a special event permit decision is subject to the provisions in Chapter 9.03 Regulation of Special Events of the Beaumont Municipal Code.
262
Item 15.

Appeal of a business license decision is subject to the provisions in Title 5 Business Taxes, Licenses and Regulations of the Beaumont Municipal Code.

Violations
Any person who willfully fails to comply with the requirements of this Chapter, or of any conditions attached hereunder, or who falsifies any information on any application hereunder is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable as set forth by state law and is subject to administrative penalties and fines as set forth in Chapter 1 of the Beaumont Municipal Code. Any special event otherwise in accordance with this Chapter shall be a public nuisance which may be enjoined or abated as allowed by law. The City retains any and all civic remedies, including the right of civil injunction for the prevention of the violations and for the recovery of money damages therefor.

263
Item 15.

City of Beaumont
550 E. 6th Street
Beaumont, CA 92223
(951) 769-8520
www.ci.beaumont.ca.us

Special Event Information

For Applicants wishing to apply for a Special Event Permit .

1. Please submit your application at least four (4) weeks prior to you event. If you want to have your event at a City Facility, please check with Community Services regarding availability prior to completion.

2. All vendors shall have a City of Beaumont Business License. Please be aware that Business License Applications should be submitted at least 2 weeks prior to the event.

3. There is no application fee for the Special Event application, however are reviewing the requests fees maybe required for needed Fire, police, or Community Services time, based on the type of event.

4. For events on private property a Temporary Use Permit maybe required to be submitted and approved by the Community Development Department.

5. For events on Public Property (i.e. Parks) a Facility Use Permit may be required to be submitted and approved by the Community Services Department.

6. Any signs wanted for the event must be approved by the Community Development Department and must meet the requirements of the Municipal Code.

7. Violations of any conditions issued as part of your approval may lead to immediate revocation and possible fines.

8. All non profit vendors/applicants shall apply for a standard annual business license which shall be issued at no charge. (with submittal of 501c3 letter)

264
Item 15.

APPLICANT (Organization Conducting Event)
YES NO
__________
__________

EVENT CONTACTS
FOR THE OFFICE OF CULTURAL AFFAIRS COORDINATED EVENTS ONLY:

GENERAL EVENT INFORMATION
City of Beaumont
550 East Sixth Street
Beaumont, Ca 92223
Phone: (951)769-8520 Fax: (951)769-8526
DAY TEL:__(____)______________ ALTERNATE TEL:__(____)______________ FAX:_____________________

SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT APPLICATION - CITY OF BEAUMONT
ORGANIZATION:____________________________________________________________ ADDRESS:_________________________________ CITY/STATE:_____________________ ZIP:___________ TEL:__(____)______________ FAX:__(____)______________ EMAIL:____________________________________ Is this a non-profit organization? If yes, provide tax identification number Can members of the general public join this organization? PRIMARY'S NAME:__________________________________ EMAIL:___________________________________ ADDRESS:_________________________________ CITY/STATE:_____________________ ZIP:___________ DAY TEL:__(____)______________ ALTERNATE TEL:__(____)______________ FAX:_____________________ ALTERNATE CONTACT:________________________________ EMAIL:__________________________________ ADDRESS:_________________________________ CITY/STATE:_____________________ ZIP:___________ ____ On a City street…………..Name of street(s):________________________________________________________ Website:________________________________________________________________________________________ Public Information Contact Name:______________________ Public Information Contact Phone#:__(____)__________ EVENT NAME:_________________________________________________________________________________ TYPE: (Parade, Festival, Run, Ceremony, ect.):__________________________________________________________ LOCATION: Check and complete all applicable lines
____ On the Downtown Parade Route (STREET)
____ In the Downtown Festival Site ( STREET)
____ In a City park…………….Name of Park(s):_________________________________________________________ ____ On a Paseo or Plaza……..Name of Paseo or Plaza(s):_________________________________________________ Page-1 of 4
FINAL CLEANUP: Date:__________ Time of Day: am/pm Indicate when the event site will be completely cleaned & reopened for normal use
City Office Use Only:
____ On private property……..Event location address:____________________________________________________ Assessor's parcel number(s) of event location:___________________________________ BEGIN SETUP: Date:_______ Time of Day: am/pm Indicate when you will take possession of the event site to begin event setup
ACTUAL EVENT DAY/DATE(S): TIME OF DAY: Est. Daily Attendance _______________________ (Start) am/pm (End) am/pm ___________________________ _______________________ (start) am/pm (End) am/pm ___________________________ _______________________ (start) am/pm (End) am/pm ___________________________ Number of attendees by age: Youth (under 18):__________ Adult:__________ Total attendance:__________________________ Number of attendees present during the most crowded period of event:_______________________________________________ 265
Item 15.

YES NO
YES NO
information (address, email and phone) for this individual should be included in the letter.

Page-2 of 4
Business Name__________________________ Tel _(____)____________________ Email___________________ For Private Property Event, a letter from the property owner (or an agent authorized by the owner) must be included with this application. The letter should be on company letterhead acknowledging their approval of the event, knowledge of the date, time and activities scheduled to take place. Contact closure.

Director of Environmental Services or his/her designee if the following conditions are met: the event occurs on a City street or on a City-owned site, facility or public park and has an average daily attendance of at least 1,000 persons.

Signature______________________________________________________________ Date___________________ Print Name___________________________________________________ Title_____________________________ _____ _____ Will there be any food and/or beverages prepared, sold or served at the event? _____ _____ Will there be sales of any kind? _____ _____ Will there be any activity connected to the event? (Examples: live animal display, parachute jump). _____ _____ Do you require any City services? (Examples: traffic control, tow zone, street barricades, electrical power, ect.)
If you answered NO to all of the questions in this section, you have completed this application. Sign the Declaration below, attach the Mandatroy Site Diagram or Route Map and submit your application. If you answered YES to ANY of the questions in this section, please complete the remainder of this application.

DECLARATION
As the authorized representative of the applicant, I hereby declare that:

Applicant shall have first obtained all approvals and paid any license fee or other fee required by the copyright owner.

SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT APPLICATION - CITY OF BEAUMONT

EVENT DESCRIPTION
_____ _____ Was this event held last year? If yes, where_______________________ Attendance?______________ _____ _____ Is this a Charitable fundraiser? If yes, for what cause?________________________________________ _____ _____ Is there an attandance fee? Fee per person: $________ Fee collected in advance?________ _____ _____ Is this event open to the public? _____ _____ Will any equipment be used on the event site? (Examples: fence, tent, canopy, table, chair, stage, trash container, dumpster, booth, amplified sound system, musical instruments, carnival ride, parade float, portable toilet, ect.)
_____ _____ Will the event require the closure of any public street or traffic lane?

SPECIFIC EVENT INFORMATION
_____ _____ Will there be any areas within the event that will be for private use only? (Example:VIP area, ect.) MANDATORY ATTACHMENTS: Required to be submitted with every application. Reference page ii for instructions. _____EVENT NARRATIVE: Please provide a description of the event theme, purpose,schedule of activities, entertainment, food, beverages (including alcohol), cleanup plan, ect. _____SITE DIAGRAM: For activities on public and private property: a detailed drawing depicting the proposed latout, including the location of booths, tables, stages, fences, dumpsters, signage, portable toilets and all other event equipment. For any activity on private property: diagram must also show all marked parking spaces, adjacent streets, residential units, and indicate the linear feet from the event boundary to streets and residences. _____ROUTE MAP: For parades, runs, walks and races on public streets or sidewalks: a map of the proposed route, route, start and finish points, direction of movement and proposed street closures including the specific lane(s) requiring

1. The information contained in this application and attachment(s) is true, complete and to the best of my knowledge.

2. Applicant agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless City, its officers, agents and employees from and against any and all claims, demands, causes of action, or liabilities incurred by City, its officers, agents, or employees, arising from Applicant's acts or omissions under this Agreement or any act of omission of the Applicant's permission or invitation of Applicant, except as may arise from the negligence or willful misconduct of City, its officers, agents, contractors, or employees. In any action or claim against City in which Applicant is defending City, City shall have the right to approve legal counsel providing City's defense and such approval shall not be reasonably withheld.

3. Applicant has received and understands the information contained in the Special Events Guidelines and will adhere to required arrangements listed within these Guidelines.

4. Applicant will pay for actual costs of any City services provided for your event within 30 days from receipt of City invoice. copyright law.

6. Applicant will provide access to the City's Special Event recycling service provider at a level of service established by the

5. No copyrighted musical or visual arts composition shall be performed or played, weather amplified, televised, in the form of a mechanical recording or personal rendition, or otherwise in connection with any use of City property, unless the Without limitation of any other provision, Applicant's indemnification of City as set forth in a permit or authorization to conduct an event, shall include indemnifying and saving City harmless from and against any and all liability or responsibility whatsoever for any infringement of an/or other violation of the right of any such copyright owner under any 266
Item 15.

YES No
YES NO
YES NO
YES NO
YES NO

SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT APPLICATION - CITY OF BEAUMONT

ADDITIONAL EVENT INFORMATION
Equipment / Source of Power

1. ______ ______ Will the event be fenced? ……. Do you want the City to provide fencing? YES:______ NO:______

2. ______ ______ Will there be parade floats?
Food and Beverage

3. ______ ______ Will ther be a tent or conopy? …….. If yes, date being erected:____________ Size(s):_____________

4. ______ ______ Will amplified sound equipment be used?

5. ______ ______ Will electrical power be used...Do you want the City to provide electrical power?Yes:___NO:___

6. ______ ______ Will a generator be used?

7. ______ ______ Will there be a stage?........ If yes, date being set up:_____________ Removal date:_____________

8. ______ ______ Will heaters be used?............. If yes, indicate heater type:_________________________________

9. ______ ______ Will there be booths?.........If yes, complete the following information:
# of sales booths:___________________ # of non-sales booths:_______________ Total booths:___________________ Booth setup date:___________ Setup time:_____________ Booth removal date:_____________ Removal time:____________ Vendor arrival date:________________ Arrival:__________________

10. Total tables that will be set up (outside of booths):_____________________________

18. ______ ______ Will you require a "No Parking" tow zone?

11. ______ ______ Will alcohol be sold or served?....... If yes, Beer?__________ Wine?__________ Other? __________

12. ______ ______ Will there be food preparation?

13. ______ ______ Will there be cooking booths?

14. Indicate all cooking methods: Electrical appliance:______________________ Liquid fuel device:______________________ Wood/Charcoal BBQ:______________________ Deep Fryer:______________________ Sales

15. ______ ______ Will any items be sold?

16. ______ ______ Will vehicles be sold?

17. ______ ______ Are you requesting a Vendor Zone? Applicable to Downtown events only - this controls vendor carts around your event.

Traffic and Parking Control
_________________________________________________________________________________ Page-3 of 4
_________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ Additional information describing above responses:______________________________________________

19. ______ ______ Will you require a traffic control officer?

20. ______ ______ Are you requesting that any public street or traffic lane be closed for your event? Miscellaneous Activities

21. ______ ______ Will ther be a circus or carnival?

22. ______ ______ Will there be fireworks/pyrotechnics?

23. ______ ______ Will there be aircraft or a parachute jump?

24. ______ ______ Will there be live animals?

25. ______ ______ Will there be items that produce extra trash/litter ((flyers, box lunches, ect.)? Describe: __________________________________________________________________________

26. ______ ______ Will there be any other type of activity not listed here? Describe: __________________________________________________________________________ 267
Item 15.

Date:

Date:
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Comments:_____________________________________________________________________

SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT APPLICATION - CITY OF BEAUMONT
Comments:_____________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Comments:_____________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Comments:_____________________________________________________________________

4. Planning _________________________________________________ Page-4 of 4

APPROVAL
_________________1. Community service ___________________________

2. Police (Chief of Designee) ______________________________________________

3. Fire ___________________________________________________ 268
Item 15.

269
Item 15.

270
Item 15.

Staff Report

TO: City Council
FROM: Christina Taylor, Community Development Director
DATE February 15, 2022
SUBJECT: Review and Approve the City of Beaumont 2022 Legislative Platform

Background and Analysis:

Each year, City Council reviews and updates the City’s legislative platform. The purpose of a legislative platform is to establish City Council’s position on various legislative topics and issues. This will allow City staff as well as the City’s legislative representatives to act quickly on behalf of the City when legislation is proposed which either agrees or conflicts with the City’s position as described in the platform.

With regard to issues that are not included in the legislative platform, no official City position will be established until City Council discusses the topic and comes to a consensus.

Guiding principles of the legislative platform are as follows:

I. PRESERVE LOCAL CONTROL
Preserve and protect the City’s powers, duties and prerogatives to enact local legislation and policy direction concerning local affairs and oppose legislation that preempts local authority. Local agencies should preserve authority and accountability for revenues raised and services provided.

II. PROMOTE FISCAL STABILITY
Support measures that promote fiscal stability, predictability, financial independence, and preserve the City’s revenue base and maximum local control over local government budgeting. Oppose measures that shift local funds to the County, State or Federal Governments and/or make cities more dependent on the County, State or Federal Governments for financial stability, such as unfunded mandates or mandated costs with no guarantee of local reimbursement or offsetting benefits.

271
Item 16.

III. SUPPORT FUNDING OPPORTUNITIES
Support opportunities that allow the City to compete for its fair share of regional, state and federal funding. Support funding for programs with combined benefits to air quality, water quality, affordable housing, infrastructure (including multi-modal transportation systems), public safety and public health.

IV. ENHANCE QUALITY OF LIFE THROUGH ADEQUATE PUBLIC SAFETY Reform recently enacted criminal justice laws — enacted by both statute and initiative — that have eroded public safety protections of Beaumont residents. Protect existing City authority to deliver local emergency services.

The platform contains policy statements covering the following fifteen areas:

1. Administration,

2. Economic Development,

3. Environment and California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA),

4. Air Quality,

5. Building,

6. Natural Hazards,

7. Solid W aste and Recycling,

8. Water Quality and W ater Supply,

9. Land Use Planning and Housing,

10. Education and Libraries,

11. Parks and Recreation,

12. Human Resources and Risk Management,

13. Public Safety and Police,

14. Fire and Emergency Medical Services, and

15. Transportation and Public W orks.

City staff will compose a legislative tracking list for the current year along with any carryover bills from the previous session and provide to City Council. The tracking will highlight those bills that may have significant impacts on the City and indicate City Council’s positions on these bills. These positions will be used to either support, oppose, or monitor each bill as it makes it way though the legislative process.

Fiscal Impact:

The cost to prepare this staff report is approximately $175.

272
Item 16.

Recommended Action:

Hold discussion and approve the 2022 Legislative Platform.

Attachments:

A. 2022 DRAFT Legislative Platform
273
Item 16.

1 CITY OF BEAUMONT
2022 LEGISLATIVE PLATFORM

PURPOSE

The City of Beaumont’s 2022 Legislative Platform confirms the City Council’s position on current issues with the potential to directly or indirectly impact the City, thereby establishing guidelines to actively pursue pending legislation through monitoring and communications activities. Below are the Guiding Principles and Policy Statements that will allow City staff to address 2022 legislative and regulatory issues in a timely manner, without precluding the consideration of additional legislative and budget issues that may arise during the legislative session.

GUIDING PRINCIPLES

IV. ENHANCE QUALITY OF LIFE THROUGH ADEQUATE PUBLIC SAFETY

Reform recently enacted criminal justice laws — enacted by both statute and initiative — that have eroded public safety protections of Beaumont residents. Protect existing city authority to deliver local emergency services.

POLICY STATEMENTS

Administration

1. Oppose State or Federal efforts to “borrow” local revenues and encourage the State to find other methods of balancing its budget.

2. Support local government action, rather than the imposition of state, federal or regional mandates 274
Item 16.

2 upon local governments, as well as federal mandates placed on the state.

3. Support maximum flexibility for local government in contracting and contract negotiations.

4. Support open government initiatives as well as the principles of the open meetings provisions of the Ralph M. Brown Act at all levels of government.

5. Support legislation that facilitates the ability of local government to share resources to increase efficiencies and decrease costs, including local efforts to address regional management of public safety personnel.

6. Support legislation that preserves the ability of local governments to determine the appropriate type of election for their jurisdiction.

7. Monitor local, state and federal legislation pertaining to e-cigarettes and cannabis.

8. Monitor and evaluate Proposition 13 and city and county tax apportionment proposals.

9. Monitor and evaluate all proposals that include an unfunded mandate.

10. Oppose any amendment to the redistribution of sales and use taxes which will negatively affect the City and its ability to provide city services and thereby cause a negative fiscal impact.

Economic Development

11. Support international, statewide, regional and local efforts to attract, retain and provide resources for current and future commercial and industrial businesses.

12. Support efforts to provide funding mechanisms for economic development tools including infrastructure investment, housing and economic development.

13. Support policies and programs that encourage working with other cities, counties and government agencies to jointly leverage resources and assets to create and strengthen economic clusters within the region.

14. Support policies, projects, programs and regulations for diversifying Beaumont’s primary economic base and facilitating investment in the City’s industrial areas that will result in maintaining or growing local jobs and creating an environment that is attractive to current and emerging industries.

15. Support economic development initiatives that preserve and enhance a positive business climate and maintain and grow the business tax base.

16. Retain job skills to adapt to economic job changes due to advances in technology.

17. Maintain an equitable program for the continued disbursement of sales and use taxes which reflect local impacts on various communities.

Environment

18. Support legislation that provides funding opportunities focused on coordinating sustainable planning in transportation, housing and economic development.

Air Quality

19. Support continued funding and incentives to local agencies to work together to improve air quality through the reduction of emissions and advancing economic and technical developments.

20. Oppose any policy or guidelines of the California Air Resources Board, or any other agency, that restricts the introduction of mixed-use development projects near multi-modal transportation centers.

21. Support policies, guidelines, incentives and funding for programs with combined benefits to air quality, water quality, housing, infrastructure (including multi-modal transportation systems) and public health. 275
Item 16.

3 Building

22. Oppose policies that mandate building requirements with a sole power source.

Natural Hazards

23. Support programs which provide funding to hazard mitigation projects including those identified in a FEMA-approved Local Hazard Mitigation Plan.

24. Support funding of state efforts to update and prepare earthquake hazard mapping.

25. Support legislation and funding that would create an earthquake early warning system.

Solid Waste and Recycling

26. Support measures that maintain and enhance local authority and economic flexibility to regulate solid waste and recyclables.

27. Oppose any measures that invalidate AB 939 (California Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989) indemnification and prevent cities from negotiating indemnification clauses with waste haulers as well as support measures that would mandate state agencies to comply with AB 939 in the same manner as required of cities and counties.

Water Quality and Water Supply

28. Support and monitor legislation that would increase the availability of, and funding for, water conservation, water reuse technologies, water recycling, local water storage and other water supply technologies such as the Groundwater Replenishment System project.

29. Support the enhancement of a reliable and sustainable water supply for California.

30. Support measures to increase water supply and improve water quality in the region, including drought relief legislation

31. Monitor water desalination technologies and support community education efforts, both pro and con, regarding desalination.

32. Support funding opportunities that are provided to local jurisdictions through Proposition 1, the Water Quality, Supply and Infrastructure Improvement Act of 2014 and Proposition 68, Park, Environment, and Water Act of 2016.

33. Support legislation that requires water providers to service housing projects that meet RHNA and or other housing mandates.

California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)

34. Support all efforts to create efficiencies within CEQA and support efforts to limit delays in the local planning and development process.

35. Support legislation that allows State agencies and local governments to continue to retain full authority to reject projects or to condition project approvals and impose mitigation measures.

36. Support legislation that prevents CEQA lawsuits from being filed for any reason other than a bonafide environmental impact.

Land Use Planning and Housing

37. Support efforts to strengthen the legal and fiscal capability of local agencies to prepare, adopt and implement plans for orderly growth, development, beautification and conservation of local planning areas.

38. Support housing measures that promote the development and enhancement of safe and affordable housing and accessible housing within the City for all economic segments of the population, while still 276
Item 16.

4 preserving local control and compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

39. Support funding opportunities that are provided to local jurisdictions through statewide bond efforts.

40. Monitor local, state and federal actions related to medical and recreational marijuana regulatory changes.

41. Oppose measures to withhold funding dedicated to transportation funding unless proposed housing goals are being met.

42. Oppose measures which would undermine established general plan, zoning and housing documents.

43. Oppose measures which undermine the planning vision of local government and contradict the expectations of our community, which includes projects mitigation their impacts.

44. Support measures which support meeting the State’s planning goals while maintaining local control, ensuring communities evolve in a manner that reflects the will of the residents and protects the public’s health, safety, and welfare.

Libraries

45. Support full funding of the Public Library fund and other local public library programs.

Education

46. Support measures that support, encourage, and/or fund Career Technical and Science, Technology, Engineering and Math (STEM) educational opportunities.

47. Support legislation that allows cities to have discretionary review on school district planning and requires school districts to mitigate their impact.

Parks and Recreation

48. Oppose efforts that erode funding for vital regional and community services that negatively impact Californian's access to parks, open space, bike lanes, after school programming, youth services, senior services, food programs, facilities that promote physical activity, protect natural resources and strengthen safety and security.

49. Support legislation and funding opportunities (e.g. federal and state park grant f unds, conservancy grant funds, project mitigation funds, etc.) that helps cities build better, stronger communities by providing funding to improve air, water, parks, open space, natural resources, historic preservation, the arts and cultural resources.

50. Promote local agency control over policies that recognize the benefits of parks and recreation facilities.

Human Resources and Risk Management

51. Oppose measures that reduce local control over employee relations issues or mandate new or enhanced local government employee benefits.

52. Oppose measures that impose compulsory and binding arbitration with respect to employees.

53. Support legislation to amend the Americans with Disabilities Act to require notice prior to filing a lawsuit.

54. Support pension reform measures designed to control or decrease employer liability or increase transparency in reporting without imposing undo hardships or administrative burdens on local government.
277
Item 16.

5 Public Safety

55. Support measures that encourage community safety and well-being including those which support state and federal reimbursement of homeland security related expenses.

56. Advocate for the strengthening and enforcement of penalties under Proposition 83 (Jessica’s Law).

Police

57. Support local control over adult entertainment facilities, problem alcohol establishments and properties where illegal drugs are sold.

58. Support local control for the regulation of cultivation, storage, manufacture, transport and use of medical marijuana.

59. Support legislation increasing resources and local authority for abatement of public vandalism, especially graffiti.

60. Support the use of Homeland Security Funds for local law enforcement agencies as first responders.

61. Monitor legislation on implementation of best practices regarding law enforcement procedures.

62. Advocate for the safeguarding of State asset forfeiture funds for law enforcement training and equipment.

Fire and Emergency Medical Services

63. Support local control of emergency medical services and ambulance service, including pre-hospital care and transport.

64. Support efforts to streamline and coordinate hazardous materials regulations.

65. Oppose National Fire Prevention Association (NPFA) standard 1710 requiring four-person fire crew staffing on each apparatus but support local determination of adequate staffing based on data and analytics.

66. Oppose the California Emergency Response Initiative and similar initiatives.

Transportation and Public Works

67. Support legislation that would increase funding for local transportation projects including road resurfacing projects, local transit projects, adding bicycle lanes, sidewalks and trails throughout the city where appropriate, programs that facilitate development-oriented transit and transit-oriented development and enhancing pedestrian safety.

68. Support increased State and Federal funding of transportation improvements with regional or sub - regional benefits for all modes of transportation.

69. Support protection of dedicated transportation-related tax revenues and enhance the ability of local agencies to finance local transportation programs and facilities.

70. Support joint planning efforts and projects with Beaumont’s border cities on traffic congestion relief projects.

71. Support efforts that remove institutional barriers of regulatory differences between public transit providers and school districts. Advocate for cooperation, collaboration, and funding between school districts and public transit providers to develop partnerships in providing transportation to students.

72. Support the reallocation of state or federal transportation dollars to reduce VMT by funding the expansion of local rail and transit projects to less populated areas. 278
Item 16.

6 73. Support commuter public transportation hubs to be located in areas where there will be a large public benefit.

279
Item 16.

Staff Report

TO: City Council
FROM: Kari Mendoza, Administrative Services Director
DATE February 15, 2022
SUBJECT: Request City Council to Approve the Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Beaumont and Police Managers as Individuals

Background and Analysis:

The current Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the City of Beaumont and the Police Managers as Individuals expired December 31, 2021, the individual parties began to meet and confer on terms and condition for the new MOU.

On February 10, 2022, the City and the Police Managers as individuals reached a tentative agreement with the major changes in the following areas:

1. Term: January 1, 2022 – June 30, 2026;

2. Salary Market Adjustments: scale adjustments based on compensation study conducted;

3. Cost of Living Adjustment: July 2023 and July 2025 based on two-year CPI;

4. Cost of Living Adjustment: If City general fund revenues exceed budged general fund revenues by 10% for any fiscal year, the City will offer a one-time 2.5% base salary lump sum;

5. Salary Step Increases: Merit steps reduced from 5% to 2.5%;

6. Salary Step Increases: One time 2.5% base salary lump sum payment for those who have reached top step; and

7. Administrative/Personal Leave: 40 hours of leave annually with a maximum of 80 hours.

Fiscal Impact:

Total impact to the reminder of the FY 21/22 budget is approximately $53,500. City staff estimates the cost to prepare this report to be $75.

280
Item 17.

Recommended Action:

Approve the Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Beaumont and Police Managers as Individuals and authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement.

Attachments:

A. Memorandum of Understanding
281
Item 17.

Dated: ___2/15/2022 MOU – POLICE MANAGEMENT UNIT Page 1 of 20

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING

BETWEEN

CITY OF BEAUMONT
AND

POLICE MANAGEMENT UNIT

Effective January 1, 2022 through June 30, 2026

282
Item 17.

Dated: ___2/15/2022 MOU – POLICE MANAGEMENT UNIT Page 2 of 20

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING

BETWEEN

CITY OF BEAUMONT
AND

POLICE MANAGEMENT UNIT

THIS MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING (“Agreement”) is entered into between the City of Beaumont (“CITY”), a Municipal Corporation, and the Beaumont Police Management Unit (“POLICE MANAGEMENT UNIT”), relative to wages, hours and other terms and conditions of employment for the classifications listed in Article IV, section A. This Agreement shall become effective January 1, 2022 and remain in full force and effect until June 30, 2026.

ARTICLE I: EMPLOYEE HANDBOOK

It is understood and agreed that there is an Employee Handbook (also referred to as the Personnel Manual) and an Employer-Employee Relations Resolution (Resolution No. 1978 - 16), which are incorporated in this Agreement by reference unless hereafter modifie d by mutual agreement. The provisions of this Agreement prevail when there is an inconsistency between this Agreement and the Employee Handbook . All previous Memoranda of Understanding and Agreements, whether written or verbal, are superseded by this Agreement.

ARTICLE II: MANAGEMENT RIGHTS

The members of the POLICE MANAGEMENT UNIT (referred to as employees or members herein) recognize and agree that the CITY and its representatives have the exclusive responsibility and authority for managing and directing all operations and activities of the CITY, including, but not limited to, the exclusive right to dete rmine the composition of its constituent departments, commissions and boards, the processes and the material to be employed: to subcontract any w ork or operation; to expand or diminish services; the procedures and standards of selection for employment and promotion; determine classification, direct its employees; take disciplinary action (for just cause following any probation period); relieve its employees from duty because of lack of work or for other legitimate reasons; maintain the efficiency of governmental operations; determine the methods, means and personnel by which governmental operations are to be conducted and to assign work to employees , make reasonable assignments outside normal job classifications when mandated by reduction of personnel, to establish and change work schedules and assignments, to determine the days and hours when the employees shall work; take all necessary actions to carry out its mission in emergencies; and exercise complete control and discretion over its organization and the technology of performing its work.

ARTICLE III: NON-DISCRIMINATION CLAUSE

The provisions of this Agreement shall apply to all persons covered by this Agreement without discrimination on account of race, religion (including religious dress and grooming practices), color, sex (including pregnancy, childbirth, breastfeeding and/or related medical conditions), sexual orientation, national origin (including language use restrictions), ancestry, citizenship 283
Item 17.

Dated: ___2/15/2022 MOU – POLICE MANAGEMENT UNIT Page 3 of 20

status, uniformed service member or veteran status, marital status, age, medical condition (genetic characteristics, cancer related), physical or mental disability (including HIV and AIDS), gender, gender identity, or gender expression, nor will there be any discrimination with respect to hiring, retention or any conditions of employment because of membership or activities on the POLICE MANAGEMENT UNIT.

The POLICE MANAGEMENT UNIT will accept into membership all eligible persons of the bargaining unit without regard to any protected class under federal, state or local law.

ARTICLE IV: POLICE MANAGEMENT UNIT SPECIFIC BENEFITS

A. RECOGNITION: The CITY hereby recognizes the POLICE MANAGEMENT UNIT as the only authorized representative of present and future employees in the Deputy Chief of Police and Police Lieutenant classifications covered by this Agreement. Provided, however, that this provision shall not preclude employees from exercising his/her rights as may be provided by the Meyers-Milias-Brown Act, or the Employee-Employer Relations Resolution of the CITY.

This Agreement does not cover the Beaumont Police Officers Association, Managers/Profession Technical, SEIU Local 721, or any other classification of employees.

B. SAFETY EQUIPMENT: The CITY will provide for their use all safety equipment, including duty weapons, to each authorized employee.

C. DUTY WEAPONS: The CITY shall furnish a duty weapon to each authorized employee. If an employee elects to carry a different duty weapon, the employee shall provide the weapon at his/her own cost. Duty weapons shall be restricted to the following calibers:
40, 45, or 9mm. Duty weapons shall be approved by the Range Staff and the Chief of Police. The employee shall qualify with the weapon before it can be carried on duty. The CITY shall provide all duty-ammunition for duty weapons.

D. 1959 SURVIVOR’S BENEFIT PROGRAM: The CITY agrees to pay the CITY and Employee portion of the 1959 Survivor’s Benefit Program (4th Level), not to exceed $150.00 per year.

E. UNIFORM ALLOWANCE: The uniform allowance for members of the unit is $100.00 per month. It is the employee’s responsibility to maintain all uniforms. CalPERS CCR 571(5) defines uniform allowance as a statutory item for classic members as reportable for the purpose of calculating retirement benefits.

F. PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT: The CITY hereby agrees to budget and to pay the dues, subscription, travel and subsistence expenses for professional and official travel, meetings, and occasions adequate to continue the professional development and to adequately pursue necessary official and other functions for the CITY, including but not limited to the California Peace Officers Association, the FBI National Academy Associates, local service clubs and such other national, regional, state, and local government groups and committees thereof on which a Manager serves as a member, as may be approved by the City Manager. The CITY also agrees to budget and to pay for the travel and subsistence expenses of members for short courses and institutes and 284
Item 17.

Dated: ___2/15/2022 MOU – POLICE MANAGEMENT UNIT Page 4 of 20

seminars that are necessary for his/her professional development, which are not POST reimbursed courses, as may be approved by the City Manager.

G. CITY VEHICLE: The CITY shall provide a CITY-owned take home vehicle for use by a member who is assigned to provide 24-hour response to emergency incidents. The CITY shall provide fuel, maintenance, and automobile insurance. A take home vehicle is to be used only for official CITY business unless approved, in writing, for incidental use by the City Manager.

In order to be eligible for a take home vehicle, a member must be able to respond promptly to the designated location and arrive within a reasonable period of time after being notified to respond. Reasonable response time shall be the time required to get ready and then drive at normal speeds to the designated duty location (including the need to first stop at the station if necessary). Employees subject to this provision must be able to arrive at the designated location within one (1) hour of notification.

Use of the vehicle is conditioned upon the following:

 Vehicle and equipment shall be secured at all times.
 Vehicle shall be either garaged or stored off-street.  Any weapons in the vehicle shall be secured in a locked compartment or vault.  Vehicle shall only be operated by the authorized employee.  Employees shall adhere to all Beaumont Police Department and CITY policies and procedures relating to vehicle operations.
 Operating the vehicle for incidental use shall not be considered time-worked, unless driving to or from an official job-related function.
 Vehicle shall not be operated outside a 100-mile radius of the CITY’s civic center without prior approval of the City Manager.
 Vehicle shall be left at the police facility while employee is on leave for one or more weeks and the vehicle will be left unattended.

H. CELL PHONE: With City Manager approval, the CITY shall provide a cell phone for use by a member who is subject to 24-hour call back.

I. EDUCATIONAL INCENTIVE: Each employee shall receive a salary increase, as indicated, if they obtain the following:

 Management P.O.S.T. Certificate an additional 2.5%.

285
Item 17.

Dated: ___2/15/2022 MOU – POLICE MANAGEMENT UNIT Page 5 of 20

ARTICLE V : S ALARY AND B ENEFITS

A. UNIFORM COMPENSATION PLAN: The CITY agrees to maintain a Uniform Compensation Plan, and shall place employees within monthly salary ranges, or the equivalent hourly rate if the employee is permanent part-time.

SALARY MARKET ADJUSTMENT: The CITY has completed and accepted a compensation study conducted by Ralph Andersen and Associates. Effective January 7th and after ratification of this MOU, the City agrees to increase salary ranges for all classifications in the bargaining unit to the median of the agencies compared in the study. The median shall be determined at top step of each range, and all steps below top step will be adjusted accordingly. Salary table attached for reference.

B. COST OF LIVING ADJUSTMENT (“COLA”):

Beginning July 1, 2023, increase salaries by CPI (with a minimum of 2% and a maximum of 5%) using the Inland Empire/Riverside index for general costs, for the two years ending the previous December 31. (Example: increase on July 1, 2023 shall be based on the increase in CPI for the two year period ending November 30, 2022.)

Beginning July 1, 2025, increase salaries by CPI (with a minimum of 2% and a maximum of 5%) using the Inland Empire/Riverside index for general costs, for the two years ending the p revious November 30.

If the City’s general fund revenues exceed the budgeted general fund revenues by 10% for any fiscal year, as determined by the City’s annual financial audit, the City will offer a one-time

2.5% of base salary, lump sum, with the first payroll distribution in the calendar month beginning after publication of the City’s audited financial statements. Such lump sum shall be reported to CalPERS if the classification has not received a scale adjustment in that fiscal year.

The parties agree that if there is no successor MOU in place as of June 30, 2026 the City will have no obligation to continue to grant additional increases based on CPI or otherwise. The City will be obligated to provide only those increases (if any) agreed to by the parties in a successor MOU or imposed by the City after impasse procedures are exhausted.

C. SALARY STEP INCREASE: Each employee may (until reaching the maximum step for a salary range), on his/her anniversary date, be eligible for a 2.5% salary step increase within the approved salary range. The CITY retains the right to approve or deny any salary step increase, for reasonable cause, after formal evaluation of said employee, which shall occur every year on or about the employee ’s anniversary date.

Once an employee reaches top step, each following year with a meets standards or higher evaluation will receive a 2.5% base salary lump sum payment. This lump sum cannot be reported to CalPERS as earnings.

D. RATE OF PAY HIGHER THAN STARTING: When an employee is hired to fill a specific position within the CITY, and his/her qualifications and/or experience justifies a rate of pay higher than the posted starting pay, the City Manager may at his/her sole discretion approve a starting pay 286
Item 17.

Dated: ___2/15/2022 MOU – POLICE MANAGEMENT UNIT Page 6 of 20

anywhere within the salary range for that position. The City Manager may also at his/her discretion offer credit for previous experience in another governmental agency for the purpose of vacation accrual calculations.

E. SAFETY POLICE EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM (PERS):

1. CalPERS Definitions:

The CITY provides employees with retirement benefits through the California Public Employees Retirement System (CalPERS). Such benefits are subject to applicable law and regulations, including but not limited to the Public Employees’ Retirement Law (PERL), the Public Employees ’ Pension Reform Act (PEPRA) of 2013, and CalPERS. For the purpose of retirement benefits, employees are defined as either a “classic” or “new” member of CalPERS as follows:

a) “Classic” Member: Any employee hired by the CITY prior to January 1, 2013; or any employee previously employed by a CalPERS participating public agency, or an agency participating in a reciprocal California public retirement system hired by that agency prior to January 1, 2013, and who becomes employed by the CITY with less than a six (6) month break in service; or any transit employee hired by the CITY prior to December 29, 2014; or any employee, regardless of hire date, who is eligible for reciprocity with another California public retirement system.

b) “New” Member: Any employee meeting the definition of New Member set forth in Government Code section 7522.04(f) .
.

2. Retirement Formulas and Calculations:

Retirement formulas and calculations are based upon a combination of the employee’s age, years of service, and annual pensionable compensation.

a) “Classic” Members: “3% at 50” and single highest year.

b) “New” Members: “2.7% at 57” and three-year average. Pensionable compensation cap on annual salary used to calculate final compensation.

3. Rates of Contributions:

a) “Classic” Members: The CITY shall pay one hundred percent (100%) of the employer’s obligation. The employee shall pay one hundred percent (100%) of the statutorily required employee obligation currently nine percent (9%) for public safety employees. There shall be no Employer Paid Member Contributions (EPMC).

287
Item 17.

Dated: ___2/15/2022 MOU – POLICE MANAGEMENT UNIT Page 7 of 20

b) “New” Members: The CITY and employee will participate in equal sharing of normal costs, with the employee paying fifty percent (50%) of normal costs or the rate as it may be changed from time to time by CalPERS.

4. Eligibility for Part-Time Employees:

Part-time employees shall be eligible for CalPERS membership if he/she meets any of the criteria set forth in Government Code section 20305, which include but are not limited to, membership on the first day of the pay period in which the employees complete one thousand (1,000) hours of service during any fiscal year (July 1 through June 30).

5. CalPERS Service Credit for Vested Sick Leave:

In accordance with the provisions set forth in Article V, section H, the CITY agrees to a service credit of unused sick leave for CalPERS retirement when an employee retires from CITY employment.

F. ASSIGNMENT TO A HIGHER JOB CLASSIFICATION: When an employee is assigned to a higher job classification for more than ninety (90) consecutive days, he/she shall receive an additional five (5%) percent differential pay, retroactive to the first day of service in the higher classification.

Such assignments shall not exceed six (6) consecutive months in length without mutual agreement of the City Manager and the appropriate unit representative or individual.

G. CAFETERIA PLAN: The CITY shall contribute one-thousand six hundred seventy five dollars ($1,675.00) per month to each unit member for the cafeteria benefit plan detailed in this section.

1. Said contribution shall be used to provide for health insurance for the employee.

The employee shall be covered by health insurance with a CITY approved health plan unless the employee provides proof to the CITY the employee is covered by another acceptable health plan as determined by the CITY’s Human Resource Department.

2. The balance may be used for any of the following or any combination thereof:

a) Health Insurance for employee ’s spouse and/or dependents;

b) Dental Insurance for employee ’s, spouse and/or dependents;

c) Eye care plan for employee, spouse and/or dependents.

3. There is no cash-back of the remaining contributions amount, if any, to the employee after payment of the selected premiums(s). The employee shall be responsible for the remaining payments(s) through payroll deduction, of any premiums selected which are in excess of the monthly contribution amount.

288
Item 17.

Dated: ___2/15/2022 MOU – POLICE MANAGEMENT UNIT Page 8 of 20

5. Cafeteria Plan Reopener: If the combined premiums for Healthcare, Dental, and Vision insurance increase more than 5% from their January 2022 rates, then the parties agree to meet and confer about increasing the Cafeteria Plan Contribution. The parties agree to hold additional reopeners in this regard if, subsequent to triggering the initial meet and confer, measuring the combined premium increases (cumulative to the triggering date) for the subsequent year(s) shows subsequent premium increases of more than 5%.

H. SICK LEAVE:

1. Sick leave shall accrue at the rate of 3.69 hours per bi-weekly pay period for full- time employees.

2. The CITY agrees to a one thousand (1,000) hour sick leave accumulation cap.

Employees will not accrue sick leave once they have reached the cap.

3. The CITY agrees to a service credit of unused sick leave for PERS retirement when an employee retires from CITY employment. If an employee leaves t he CITY with at least seven (7) years of service, the employee may elect to receive a lump sum payment of the value of the unused sick leave. If the employee leaves the CITY prior to completing seven (7) years of service, then the employee is eligible for sick leave cash out using the following guidelines. This payment will be determined by a graduating scale that increases by fifteen percent (15%) per year for each year completed, through the first six (6) years of service ninety percent (90%) and an additional ten percent (10%) after completion of the seventh (7th) year of service (100%). All sick leave vesting levels shall begin after the completion of probation and the second (2nd) year of service thirty percent (30%).

A year of service will be considered completed when the employee reaches the anniversary date of their initial employment. Any accumulated sick leave that is cashed out shall not also be eligible to obtain additional CalPERS service credit.

See scale provided below:

Year Completed 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th
% Vested 0% 30% 45% 60% 75% 90% 100%

Accumulated sick leave hours will be paid out at the time of separation from service at the employee’s hourly rate at the time of separation.

4. Employees who are laid off as a result of a reduction in force shall receive, at the option of the employee, either a lump sum payment equal to one hundred percent (100%) of accrued sick leave or the one hundred percent (100%) service credit towards retirement if the employee chooses to retire immediately following layoff.

5. All employees can use accrued paid sick leave for the purposes set forth in Labor Code section 246.5(a).

289
Item 17.

Dated: ___2/15/2022 MOU – POLICE MANAGEMENT UNIT Page 9 of 20

6. Accrued paid sick leave shall carry over to the following year, but no additional paid sick pay will accrue until the employee’s accrued paid sick leave falls below the one thousand (1,000) hour cap.

7. The CITY will provide all employees with a written notice of the amount of paid sick leave available. The notice will be provided on the designated pay date with the employee’s payment of wages. Sick pay will be paid at employee’s hourly rate of pay when the sick leave is taken. Sick pay will be paid by the payday for the next regular payroll period after the sick leave is taken.

8. Employees can use accrued paid sick leave upon a written or oral request. If the need to use paid sick leave is foreseeable, the employee must give reasonable advance notice. If the need to use paid sick leave is unforeseeable, notice must be given as soon as practicable.

9. On July 1st of every year, part-time, seasonal temporary employees will be credited 3 days (24 hours) or 3 times their normal shift of sick leave. It shall not be carried over but is available for cash out upon termination.

10. Accumulated sick leave hours can be paid at the time of separation from service at the employee’s hourly rate at the time of separation or the CITY agrees to a service credit of unused sick leave for CalPERS retirement when an employee retires from CITY employment.

11. An employee may make an irrevocable election each December to receive payment of up to eighty (80) hours of the sick leave to be accrued in the following calendar year. The employee is eligible to make the request provided that the employee is fully vested (7 years) and has a minimum of 160 sick hours in the sick hours bank at the time the irrevocable election is made in December. Such payments will be made by separate check with the payroll distribution for the first full pay period in July unless the employee requests equal quarterly payments. Cash payment shall only be made for sick leave accrued that has not yet been used by the employee by the payment date. The City will provide the form for the employee to make the irrevocable election. The form shall be submitted to the City’s Human Resources Department no later than December 15 of each year or employee will waive his/her right to elect to cash out sick leave for the following year. The only exception to this deadline is if the employee experiences an unforeseeable event after the deadline.

In those circumstances, the employee can seek to make an initial election, or increase the number of hours elected (subject to all the other requirements and limitations as set forth herein) by submitting the City’s election form to the City’s Human Resources Department.

The City Manager shall make a determination if the exception applies and the City Manager determination shall be final and not subject to any grievance procedure or appeal process.

I. LIFE INSURANCE: The CITY agrees to provide group term life insurance up to fifty thousand dollars ($50,000) for each employee.

J. SHORT-TERM DISABILITY INSURANCE: The CITY agrees to maintain the short-term disability coverage at the levels in effect on January 1, 2014 for full-time employees.

290
Item 17.

Dated: ___2/15/2022 MOU – POLICE MANAGEMENT UNIT Page 10 of 20

K. BILINGUAL PAY: Employees who have been certified using a CITY designated language proficiency test as being fluent speaking or interpreting (not reading or writing) in sign language or other secondary languages shall receive one dollar and fifty cents ($1.50) per hour premium pay, if the need for fluency is necessary in the current job and approved by the Administrative Director and City Manager. Each certified employee may be required to be recertified as a condition of continued receipt of premium pay. Authorization and continuation of premium pay will be at the sole discretion of the City Manager.

L. DIRECT DEPOSIT: As a general rule, all employees shall be paid by direct deposit of their payroll check into an account of their choice at a financial institution.

M. WELLNESS PROGRAM: An employee who voluntarily joins a health or fitness club, purchases pre- approved exercise equipment, visits a chiropractor shall be eligible for reimbursement of the fee up to but not exceeding fifty dollars ($50) for each full month the employee has been employed.

It will be the responsibility of the employee to submit requests for reimbursement to the Human Resources department in order to receive reimbursement. The CITY shall pay this reimbursement bi-annually under the CITY reimbursement policy. Each participating employee is solely liable and responsible for any and all personal injuries, and shall fully indemnify the CITY. The CITY assumes no liability for injury or compensation for employee participation in this program, nor is this a mandated program or a job requirement.

N. ADMINISTRATIVE/PERSONAL LEAVE: Salary employees shall be allocated a maximum of forty (40) hours of administrative/personal leave on July 1st of each CITY fiscal year. The maximum amount of administrative/personal leave that the salary employees may accrue at any given time may not exceed eighty (80) hours total. Employees may request payment of up to forty (40) hours banked administrative leave pay, to be paid by separate check, per calendar year.

Requests for payment of banked leave pay should be submitted in accordance with the procedure stated in section V.H.11 above.

ARTICLE VI: HOURS AND WORKING CONDITIONS

A. HOLIDAY ACCRUAL: The CITY allocates fourteen (14) eight-hour days per year accrued at 4.31 hours per pay period (one hundred twelve (112) hours per year). Holiday time may be taken as time off if the Department Head or City Manager can properly schedule the time off. Scheduled time off does not need to occur on actual holidays.

An employee may request payment of banked holiday pay, to be paid by separate check.

Requests for cash payment pursuant to this section shall be submitted to the Human Resources department bi-annually. Such requests must be submitted quarterly by March 1st, June 1st, September 1st, or December 1st to be paid on the first full pay period after.

An employee may maintain a maximum of two hundred twenty-four hours (224) of banked holiday pay. Any excess holiday hours, above the maximum accrual, as of December 31st of any year, will be paid to employees in January of the next year using the rate of pay in effect prior to any Memorandum of Understanding increase in January.

291
Item 17.

Dated: ___2/15/2022 MOU – POLICE MANAGEMENT UNIT Page 11 of 20

Those employees assigned to a flex schedule will deduct the scheduled hours from their holiday accrual leave bank (E.g. An employee that is normally scheduled to work a 4/10 will deduct 10 hours holiday accrual from their leave bank on a holiday off).

A holiday shall cover a twenty-four (24)-hour period beginning at 12:00 a.m. and ending at 11:59 p.m.

B. VACATION ACCRUAL: Vacation time shall be accrued on the following basis and shall be credited for subsequent use each pay period.

Total vacation accrual for any employee shall not exceed the equivalent of two (2) years’ accrual at the current accrual rate for that employee. Employees will no longer accrue vacation hours once they have reached the cap.

An employee may make an irrevocable election each December to receive payment of up to eighty (80) hours of vacation leave to be accrued in the following calendar year. Such payments will be made by separate check with the payroll distribution for the first full pay period in July unless the employee requests equal quarterly payments. Cash payment shall only be made for vacation leave accrued that has not yet been used by the employee by the payment date. The City will provide the form for the employee to make the irrevocable election. The form shall be submitted to the City’s Human Resources Department no later than December 15 of each year or employee will waive his/her right to elect to cash out vacation leave for the following year. The only exception to this deadline is if the employee experiences an unforeseeable event after the deadline. In those circumstances, the employee can seek to make an initial election, or increase the number of hours elected (subject to all the other requirements and limitations as set forth herein) by submitting the City’s election form to the City’s Human Resources Department. The City Manager shall make a determination if the exception applies and the City Manager determination shall be final and not subject to any grievance procedure or appeal process.

C. Administrative/Personal Leave. EMPLOYEE shall be allocated a maximum of forty (40) hours of administrative/personal leave on July 1st of each CITY fiscal year. The maximum amount of administrative/personal leave that EMPLOYEE may accrue at any given time may not exceed eighty (80) hours total. EMPLOYEE may request payment of up to forty (40) hours banked administrative leave pay, to be paid by separate check, per calendar Hire date - Three (3) years two (2) weeks per year 3.077 hours per pay period Three (3) years 1 day - Seven (7) years three (3) weeks per year 4.615 hours per pay period Seven (7) years 1 day - Nineteen (19)
years
four (4) weeks per year 6.153 hours per pay period
Nineteen (19) years 1 day five (5) weeks per year 7.692 hours per pay period 292
Item 17.

Dated: ___2/15/2022 MOU – POLICE MANAGEMENT UNIT Page 12 of 20

year. Requests for payment of banked administrative leave pay should be submitted in accordance with the procedure stated in the Managers Group MOU.

D. PROMOTION PROBATIONARY PURPOSES: During the probationary in paid status following a promotion or transfer, a regular employee who held permanent status at the time of the promotion or transfer shall, upon the employee’s request, be returned to a position in the previously held classification in the former employing department if a vacancy exists. If the return involves a change in classification, the salary step shall be the same step that the employee held or would have received immediately prior to the promotion or transfer. Computation of the probationary period in a paid status does not include overtime, stand-by, on-call or military leave of absence.

E. BIDDING FOR OPEN POSITIONS: In the event any position becomes open, it will be the responsibility of the Human Resources Department to notify permanent full-time and permanent part-time CITY employees of the opening prior to outside recruitment. Such responsibility shall include posting of a notice in a conspicuous place within each regular work location for a period of ten (10) working days prior to outside recruitment. This notice will include the rate of pay ranges, hours to be worked, and any special requirements and conditions. An eligible and qualified employee interested in an open position shall submit an application and supporting documentation within ten (10) working days of the announcement’s posting to be considered for the position prior to outside recruitment. If an eligible and qualified represented employee is selected to fill an open position, the employee will maintain his/her seniority, but will be required to accept the salary step range applicable to the job. Placement of an individual on a step higher than starting pay will be at the discretion of the department administrator of the job applied for and the City Manager. Seniority within the CITY will prevail over similar qualifications. If an individual believes that he/she was unfairly evaluated for the position bid for, he/she may utilize the formal grievance procedure.

Employees shall meet all requirements, qualifications and training, and pass any and all examinations that may be required for such position before being appointed.

ARTICLE VII: PERSONNEL RULES AND REGULATIONS

Representatives from the CITY and the POLICE MANAGEMENT UNIT will meet for the purpose of possible modification of the Employee Handbook and to convert it into a Personnel Rules and Regulations format.

ARTICLE VIII : J OB DESCRIPTIONS

Representatives from the CITY and each bargaining unit will meet for the purpose of possible modifications and revisions of employee job descriptions into a standardized and consistent format.

ARTICLE IX : S AVINGS C LAUSE

Should any provision of this Agreement, or any application thereof, be made unlawful by virtue of any Federal, State or local law and/or regulation, including judicial decisions, such provision 293
Item 17.

Dated: ___2/15/2022 MOU – POLICE MANAGEMENT UNIT Page 13 of 20

shall be effective and implemented only to the extent permitted by such laws, regulations and decisions. In all other respects the provisions of this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect for the term thereof.

ARTICLE X : S KELLY PROCEDURE

A. STANDARDS OF CONDUCT: It is expected that all CITY employees shall render the best possible service and reflect credit on the CITY, and therefore high standards of conduct are essential.

B. IMPROPER EMPLOYEE CONDUCT: Improper conduct may be cause for disciplinary action up to and including termination of employment. The term “improper conduct” means not only any improper action by an employee in the employee’s official capacity, but also conduct by an employee not connected with the employee’s official duties that affects the employee’s ability to perform official duties, and any improper use of the position as an employee for personal advantage. In addition, improper conduct includes, but is not limited to, the following.

1. Tardiness.

2. Failure to observe precautions for personal safety, posted rules, signs, safety instructions, or to use protective clothing or equipment.

3. Careless workmanship resulting in waste of materials.

4. Unsatisfactory work performance.

5. Abuse of sick leave privileges, e.g., failure to present adequate documentation of illness when required by the City Manager or respective department head, use of sick leave for unauthorized purposes.

6. Failure or delay in carrying out orders, work assignments, or instructions of superiors; inattention to, or dereliction of duty, including loafing or wasting time.

7. Acceptance of gifts from parties doing business with the CITY.

8. Unauthorized sleeping while on duty.

9. Disorderly conduct: fighting, threatening, attempting to inflict bodily injury on another; engaging in dangerous horseplay.

10. Being on duty under the influence of a chemical or intoxicant or reporting for duty while so influenced.

11. Chemical or alcohol abuse affecting work performance.

12. Loss or destruction of CITY property or the property of others, through carelessness.

13. Political activity in violation of the law.

294
Item 17.

Dated: ___2/15/2022 MOU – POLICE MANAGEMENT UNIT Page 14 of 20

14. Unexcused absence from duty.

15. Reckless driving on CITY premises or reckless operation of CITY vehicle.

16. Gambling or promotion of gambling on CITY premises while on duty.

17. Endangering the safety of or causing injury to any employee, including him or herself.

18. Unauthorized disclosure of confidential information as defined by law or by written directive of the CITY or respective department.

19. Treating any city official, officer or employee, or any member of the public, in a disrespectful, rude, insulting, abusive or demeaning manner while in the performance of duties, or related thereto.

20. Unauthorized use of CITY vehicles or equipment.

21. Covering up or attempting to conceal defective work, removing or destroying same without permission.

22. Knowingly making a falsification, misstatement or concealment of material fact in connection with employment, promotion, any record, investigation, or other proper proceeding.

23. Making false or unfounded statements which are derogatory, slanderous or defamatory about other employees or officials.

24. Willful damage to CITY property or to the property of others.

25. Making a false confession.

26. Any on-duty violation of federal, state or local laws or any off-duty violation of law which might bring discredit to the CITY.

27. Failure to adhere to this adopted Memorandum of Understanding or to other CITY or departmental rules, policies or procedures.

28. Sexual harassment or other unlawful discrimination.

29. Willful violation of CITY or Departmental policies and procedures regarding media contact.

C. DISCIPLINARY PROCESS: The purpose of disciplinary action is to correct deficiencies in employee performance, to seek improvement to meet appropriate standards, and/or to correct for violation of CITY policies. The CITY will verbally counsel an employee when circumstances warrant it, prior to taking any formal disciplinary action. This gives the supervisor an opportunity to communicate in a non-disciplinary fashion that a problem is perceived and that the supervisor is available to help solve it. 295
Item 17.

Dated: ___2/15/2022 MOU – POLICE MANAGEMENT UNIT Page 15 of 20

Discipline may be initiated for various reasons, including, but not limited to, violations of CITY work rules, insubordination or poor job performance. The severity of the action depends on the nature of the offense and an employee’s record, and may range from verbal counseling to dismissal.

The disciplinary process outlined below has been established to provide general guidelines for a fair method for disciplining employees. Disciplinary actions imposed under this article shall be in accordance with sections 3300-3311 of the California Government Code.

1. Normal Progressive Discipline Sequence:

a) Verbal Reprimand: To communicate to the employee that a repeat action may result in more serious disciplinary action. (Not appealable)

b) Written Reprimand: A written communication to the employee that the same or related offense has been committed. A copy of this warning is given to the employee and one copy is filed in the employee’s personnel file.

Written reprimands may be appealed to the Chief of Police within five (5) calendar days. The decision of the Chief of Police shall be final. In addition, the employee may submit a written response within thirty (30) calendar days. The employee’s response will be attached to the written reprimand.

c) Suspension: Temporary removal of an employee from his/her duties without pay for misconduct.

d) Demotion: This step involves either the reduction in pay step or reduction in class.

e) Dismissal: The final step in the disciplinary process.

2. Disciplinary Procedure: Although one or more of these steps may be taken in connection with a particular employee, no formal order or system is necessary. The CITY reserves the right to deviate from this sequence when it feels that circumstances are so severe that such a deviation is warranted. The Chief of Police or designee is vested with the authority to determine the appropriate course of action.

Further steps in the discipline involving suspension, demotion or dismissal should not be taken without consulting the department head and the Human Resources Director.
a) Suspension, Demotion, Dismissal. Subject to the Hearings and Appeals Procedures specified in section D below, the CITY may:

Impose a suspension without pay upon an employee when, in his/her judgment, such action will best serve the interests of the CITY. Such suspension shall, however, not exceed a period of thirty (30) working days 296
Item 17.

Dated: ___2/15/2022 MOU – POLICE MANAGEMENT UNIT Page 16 of 20

except that if the suspension is imposed because of an employee’s trial by a court of law, the suspension may extend to such time as that court has rendered its decision.

b) Suspension without Pay. Suspensions shall occur only after the notice procedures specified in section D.1 and shall be subject to appeal in accordance with section D.2.

c) Demote an employee to a position in a lower class with an appropriate reduction in pay or a reduction in pay step, for reasons including, but not limited to, unsatisfactory performance.

d) Dismiss for cause any r employee.

D. HEARINGS, APPEALS AND GRIEVANCES: Only discipline involving suspension, demotion or dismissal is subject to an appeal as outlined below.

1. Pre-Discipline Meeting Procedures: Prior to undertaking the personnel actions set forth in Article XII, the department head or designee shall first provide the employee with a written specification of reasons for the proposed action and all documents relied on to support the action being taken. The statement shall either be delivered personally to the employee or sent by Certified Mail, Return Receipt Requested, and shall notify the employee of his/her right to request a meeting with the department head. The employee may, accordingly, request a meeting to determine if there is cause for the proposed personnel action. A request for a meeting must be in writing and must be delivered to the department head on or before five (5) working days after the employee’s receipt of notice of intended action.

Upon receipt of the Request for Meeting, the department head shall notify the employee of the time and place for a meeting to be held not later than ten (10) working days after receipt of the request therefore. The employee shall be entitled to be present at such meeting together with an attorney and/or designated representative. The meeting is to be conducted by the department head or designee and shall provide the employee with the opportunity to refute, explain, or otherwise address the proposed statement of charges. All decisions of the department head or designee shal l be rendered within ten (10) working days after conclusion of the meeting, and shall be final unless timely appealed by the employee as provided in section D.2.

2. Appeals Procedures: Any regular employee subjected to any disciplinary action set forth herein (suspension, demotion or dismissal) may appeal any decision of the department head or designee by filing a written Notice of Appeal with the City Manager or designee within five (5) working days after his/her receipt of the decision. The employee’s appeal shall be heard by an impartial hearing officer selected in a manner mutually agreeable to the City Manager and the employee; if no agreement is reached the hearing officer shall be selected from a list of advisory 297
Item 17.

Dated: ___2/15/2022 MOU – POLICE MANAGEMENT UNIT Page 17 of 20

mediators from a list provided by the State Mediation and Conciliation Service (SCMS) – Public Employment Relations Board (PERB).

a) Representation: The employee may be represented by his/her Association/Union representative, any other regular employee of the CITY, or his/her attorney.

b) Hearing: The hearing officer shall issue subpoenas to compel the attendance of witnesses, if he/she deems such to be necessary at the request of either party. The hearing may be recorded by a certified shorthand reporter.

c) Evidence: Oral evidence shall be taken only on oath or affirmation. Each party shall have the right to call and examine witnesses, to introduce exhibits, to cross-examine opposing witnesses on any matter relevant to the issue even though the matter was not covered in the direct examination, to impeach any witness regardless of which party first called him/her to testify, and to rebut the evidence against him/her.

3. Binding Arbitration: Permanent employees who receive a long-term suspension or are demoted or terminated may, after the hearing, appeal the discipline by submitting it to binding arbitration. Arbitration shall be conducted as follows: If the parties cannot mutually choose an arbitrator, the parties will request a list of five (5) arbitrators, preferably arbitrators with experience in police and fire discipline matters, from the State Mediation and Conciliation Service (SMCS) - Public Employment Relations Board (PERB). The parties will flip a coin. The winner shall choose the first name and so on until one name is left who shall be the arbitrator. The arbitrator must decide each and every dispute in accordance with the laws of the State of California, and all other applicable laws. Limited discovery may be conducted in the arbitration proceeding as approved by the arbitrator. Unless the employee and the city stipulate to the contrary, prior to the appointment of the arbitrator, all disputes shall first be submitted to non- binding mediation, conducted by a neutral mediator. The parties shall split the cost of all fees charged for such mediation and arbitration proceedings. The arbitrator’s decision is final and binding.

ARTICLE XI: GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE-NON-SKELLY

A. PURPOSE: A grievance is a complaint by an employee or the employee’s organization that the employee has been adversely affected due to a misinterpretation or misapplication of this Memorandum of Understanding. Disciplinary actions are subject only to the provisions of Article XII, and are not subject to the procedures of this Article.

B. TIME LIMIT FOR PURSUING GRIEVANCES: To ensure timely resolution of grievances, a grievance shall be pursued within 10 business days after the employee became aware of the grievance, or reasonably should have been aware of it. All other grievances shall be deemed untimely and may be rejected unless the city manager, in his/her sole discretion, determines that there is good cause for the late filing of a grievance.

298
Item 17.

Dated: ___2/15/2022 MOU – POLICE MANAGEMENT UNIT Page 18 of 20

C. GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE: There are four steps to the grievance procedure:

Step 1: Informal Discussion with Immediate Supervisor: Employee(s) shall first take their grievance up informally with his/her immediate supervisor. If the grievance is not resolved by informal discussion, the employee(s) may formally submit, in writing, the grievance to his/her immediate supervisor. The employee(s) shall briefly describe the grievance and, when possible, a suggested solution. The immediate supervisor shall forward the grievance within two working days to the department head. If the immediate supervisor is the subject of the grievance, skip to Step 2.

Step 2: Department Head: The department head shall meet with the employee(s) within three working days after receiving the written grievance and shall deliver his/her answer in writing to the employee(s) within two working days thereafter. The employee(s) shall have the right to present the grievance to the department head with or without a representative.

Step 3: Human Resources Director or Assistant City Manager: If the grievance is not resolved in step 2, the employee(s) may submit it in writing to the Human Resources Director (or Assistant City Manager) within three working days after the department head’s answer is received by the employee(s). The Human Resources Director (or Assistant City Manager) shall meet with the employee(s) within three working days after having received the written grievance and shall deliver his/her response to them in writing within three working days after such meeting.

Step 4: City Manager: If The grievance is not resolved in step 3, the employee(s) may submit it in writing to the City Manager within three working days after the decision of the Human Resources Manager/Assistant City Manager is received. The City Manager shall meet with the employee(s) within five working days after having received the grievance and shall deliver his or her response in writing within five working days after such meeting, or subsequent meeting(s), if any. The decision of the City Manager shall be binding and conclusive on all parties.

ARTICLE XII: NEGOTIATING
For purposes of renegotiating the Agreement, either party may submit a written request to the other party to renegotiate this Agreement no earlier than Jan 1 and no later than March 31 prior to the scheduled date of expiration of the Agreement.

The parties shall meet and confer in good faith in an endeavor to reach agreement prior to the adoption of the CITY's final budget for the ensuing fiscal year. As set forth in the Employer - Employee Relations Resolution, good faith shall consist of, among other things, the meeting of the parties at reasonable times and places, the exchange of information, the exchange of proposals and counter proposals; however, it shall not require the granting of a concession, nor the incorporation of permissive items into the final agreement. In the event that an agreement is reached, the parties shall reduce the matter to writing in the form of a Memorandum of Understanding, which shall not be binding, and shall submit the matter for consideration before the City Council during a p ublic meeting.

299
Item 17.

Dated: ___2/15/2022 MOU – POLICE MANAGEMENT UNIT Page 19 of 20

ARTICLE XIII: COMPLETE AGREEMENT CLAUSE

This written Agreement is the complete Agreement negotiated between the parties. Nothing excluded from this Agreement is agreed to unless it is put in writing, signed by all parties and attached to the Agreement as an amendment hereto.

ARTICLE XIV: WAGE REOPENER

During the term of this Agreement, in the event that CITY determines that layoffs will be implemented during the term of this Agreement, both parties agree that upon written notice from CITY, this Agreement shall reopen on the subject of wages only, and the parties shall meet and confer over wages.

300
Item 17.

Dated: ___2/15/2022 MOU – POLICE MANAGEMENT UNIT Page 20 of 20

SIGNATURE PAGE TO

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING

BETWEEN

CITY OF BEAUMONT
AND

POLICE MANAGEMENT UNIT

Effective January 1, 2022 through June 30, 2026

For the CITY OF BEAUMONT

___________________________________ _____________
City Manager Date

For the POLICE MANAGEMENT UNIT

___________________________________ _____________
Date

301
Item 17.

Staff Report

TO: City Council
FROM: Todd Parton, City Manager
DATE February 15, 2022
SUBJECT: Approval of Compensation Plan and Salary Table

Background and Analysis:

The attached compensation plan has been adjusted to account for all 202 2 minimum wage requirements, negotiated salary increases between bargaining units, individuals and the City of Beaumont as well as all other positions found to be below the market median pursuant to the attached compensation study performed by Ralph Andersen and Associates.

All positions authorized by City Council since the last adoption of the compensation plan on May 4, 2021, have been added to the schedule. These positions include the Assistant Director of Finance, Environmental Compliance Manager, General Manager of Utilities and the Wastewater Collections Supervisor.

Additional positions that were adjusted in conjunction with the study completed by Ralph Andersen and Associates include the Assistant City Manager, Assistant Director of Community Services, Assistant Director of Finance, IT Analyst II, Police Cadet, Police Corporal, Principal Engineer, Police Trainee and Support Services Specialist. These positions were adjusted to ensure internal equity in the organization based on job duties and assignments and also considering their respectful positions in the City’s organizational structure. Ralph Andersen recommended executive positions should generally move in line with other key department heads. City Council also directed staff to maintain a minimum of 15% of separation between supervisors and subordinates and a minimum of 20% between executive directors and assistant directors.

Fiscal Impact:

The fiscal impact for the remainder of FY 21/22 is approximately $402,000. City staff estimates the cost to prepare this staff report to be $340.

302
Item 18.

Recommended Action:

Approval of the Compensation Plan and Salary Table.

Attachments:

A. Compensation Plan
B. Salary Table
C. Ralph Andersen and Associates Labor Market Survey
303
Item 18.

Dated: February 15, 2022 Uniform Compensation Plan Page 1 of 2

- COMPENSATION PLAN -

Adopted by City Council February 15, 2022

Position MOU Assigned To Salary Range
First Step Top Step
Account Technician SEIU 44 54
Administrative Services Director Employment Contract 92 102 Administrative Services Manager Professional/Technical/Manager 74 84 Animal Control Officer I SEIU 44 54
Animal Control Officer II SEIU 48 58
Assistant City Manager Employment Contract 99 109
Assistant Director of Community Services Professional/Technical/Manager 75 85 Assistant Director of Finance Professional/Technical/Manager 84 94 Assistant Director of Public Works/
Assistant City Engineer
Professional/Technical/Manager
78 88
Budget Specialist Professional/Technical/Manager 60 70 Building/Grounds/Maintenance Supervisor Professional/Technical/Manager 57 67 Building/Grounds/Maintenance Worker SEIU 38 48
Building Inspector SEIU 52 62
Building Permit Technician I SEIU 40 50
Building Permit Technician II SEIU 46 56
Building Plans Examiner SEIU 54 64
Bus Driver – Lead SEIU 38 48
Bus Driver I SEIU 32 42
Bus Driver II SEIU 38 48
Chief Building Official Professional/Technical/Manager 82 92 Chief of Police Employment Contract 98 108
Chief Plant Operator – Wastewater Professional/Technical/Manager 77 87 City Engineer / Public Works Director Employment Contract 92 102 City Manager Employment Contract 102 112
Community Enhancement Officer I SEIU 46 56
Community Enhancement Officer II SEIU 50 60
Community Development Director Employment Contract 88 98 Community Services Director Employment Contract 83 93
Community Services Manager Professional/Technical/Manager 66 76 Customer Service Coordinator I SEIU 32 42
Customer Service Coordinator II SEIU 38 48
Deputy Chief of Police Police Management 92 102
Deputy City Clerk Professional/Technical/Manager 64 74
Economic Development Manager Professional/Technical/Manager 72 82 Engineering Development Technician I SEIU 40 50
Engineering Development Technician II SEIU 46 56
Environmental Compliance Manager Professional/Technical/Manager 60 70 Executive Assistant Professional/Technical/Manager 49 59 Finance Director Employment Contract 92 102
General Manager of Utilities Employment Contract 92 102 304
Item 18.

Dated: February 15, 2022 Uniform Compensation Plan Page 2 of 2 Position MOU Assigned To Salary Range
First Step Top Step
Information Technology Manager Professional/Technical/Manager 81 91 HR/Payroll Technician SEIU 42 52
IT Analyst I SEIU 45 55
IT Analyst II SEIU 53 63
Lead Building/Grounds Maintenance Worker SEIU 44 54
Lead Dispatcher POA 47 57
Mechanic SEIU 44 54
Management Analyst SEIU 58 68
Planning Manager Professional/Technical/Manager 78 88
Police Cadet 29 29
Police Corporal Police Officers Association 68 78
Police Lieutenant Police Management 85 95
Police Officer Police Officers Association 62 72
Police Sergeant Police Officers Association 74 84
Principal Engineer Professional/Technical/Manager 72 82 Public Safety Dispatcher I Police Officers Association 37 47 Public Safety Dispatcher II Police Officers Association 43 53 Police Trainee 47 47
Public Works Inspector SEIU 57 67
Recreation Specialist SEIU 24 34
Senior Accountant Professional/Technical/Manager 68 78
Solid Waste Recycling Manager Professional/Technical/Manager 60 70 Special Projects/Press Information Officer Professional/Technical/Manager 69 79 Street Maintenance Supervisor Professional/Technical/Manager 56 66 Street Maintenance Worker SEIU 44 54
Support Services Specialist I Police Officers Association 31 41 Support Services Specialist II Police Officers Association 37 47 Support Services Supervisor Police Officers Association 57 67 Transit Manager Professional/Technical/Manager 72 82
Vehicle Maintenance Supervisor Professional/Technical/Manager 63 73 Wastewater Collections Supervisor Professional/Technical/Manager 56 66 Wastewater Collection System Worker I SEIU 44 54
Wastewater Collection System Worker II SEIU 48 58
Wastewater Plant Operator I SEIU 45 55
Wastewater Plant Operator II SEIU 51 61
Wastewater Plant Operator III SEIU 55 65
Wastewater Plant Operator IV SEIU 59 69
Wastewater Plant Operator V SEIU 63 73
Wastewater Plant Supervisor Professional/Technical/Manager 65 75

305
Item 18.

Step Annual Monthly Bi-Weekly Hourly Step Annual Monthly Bi-Weekly Hourly 0 17,638.44$ 1,469.87$ 678.40$ 8.48$ 57 72,072.00$ 6,006.00$ 2,772.00$ 34.65$ 1 18,075.24$ 1,506.27$ 695.20$ 8.69$ 58 73,860.84$ 6,155.07$ 2,840.80$ 35.51$ 2 18,532.80$ 1,544.40$ 712.80$ 8.91$ 59 75,711.96$ 6,309.33$ 2,912.00$ 36.40$ 3 18,990.36$ 1,582.53$ 730.40$ 9.13$ 60 77,604.84$ 6,467.07$ 2,984.80$ 37.31$ 4 19,468.80$ 1,622.40$ 748.80$ 9.36$ 61 79,539.24$ 6,628.27$ 3,059.20$ 38.24$ 5 19,947.24$ 1,662.27$ 767.20$ 9.59$ 62 81,536.04$ 6,794.67$ 3,136.00$ 39.20$ 6 20,446.44$ 1,703.87$ 786.40$ 9.83$ 63 83,574.36$ 6,964.53$ 3,214.40$ 40.18$ 7 20,966.40$ 1,747.20$ 806.40$ 10.08$ 64 85,654.44$ 7,137.87$ 3,294.40$ 41.18$ 8 21,486.36$ 1,790.53$ 826.40$ 10.33$ 65 87,796.80$ 7,316.40$ 3,376.80$ 42.21$ 9 22,027.20$ 1,835.60$ 847.20$ 10.59$ 66 90,001.56$ 7,500.13$ 3,461.60$ 43.27$ 10 22,588.80$ 1,882.40$ 868.80$ 10.86$ 67 92,247.96$ 7,687.33$ 3,548.00$ 44.35$ 11 23,150.40$ 1,929.20$ 890.40$ 11.13$ 68 94,556.76$ 7,879.73$ 3,636.80$ 45.46$ 12 23,712.00$ 1,976.00$ 912.00$ 11.40$ 69 96,927.96$ 8,077.33$ 3,728.00$ 46.60$ 13 24,315.24$ 2,026.27$ 935.20$ 11.69$ 70 99,361.56$ 8,280.13$ 3,821.60$ 47.77$ 14 24,918.36$ 2,076.53$ 958.40$ 11.98$ 71 101,816.04$ 8,484.67$ 3,916.00$ 48.95$ 15 25,542.36$ 2,128.53$ 982.40$ 12.28$ 72 104,374.44$ 8,697.87$ 4,014.40$ 50.18$ 16 26,187.24$ 2,182.27$ 1,007.20$ 12.59$ 73 106,974.36$ 8,914.53$ 4,114.40$ 51.43$ 17 26,832.00$ 2,236.00$ 1,032.00$ 12.90$ 74 109,657.56$ 9,138.13$ 4,217.60$ 52.72$ 18 27,518.40$ 2,293.20$ 1,058.40$ 13.23$ 75 112,403.16$ 9,366.93$ 4,323.20$ 54.04$ 19 28,204.80$ 2,350.40$ 1,084.80$ 13.56$ 76 115,211.16$ 9,600.93$ 4,431.20$ 55.39$ 20 28,911.96$ 2,409.33$ 1,112.00$ 13.90$ 77 118,081.56$ 9,840.13$ 4,541.60$ 56.77$ 21 29,619.24$ 2,468.27$ 1,139.20$ 14.24$ 78 121,035.24$ 10,086.27$ 4,655.20$ 58.19$ 22 30,368.04$ 2,530.67$ 1,168.00$ 14.60$ 79 124,071.96$ 10,339.33$ 4,772.00$ 59.65$ 23 31,116.84$ 2,593.07$ 1,196.80$ 14.96$ 80 127,171.20$ 10,597.60$ 4,891.20$ 61.14$ 24 31,907.16$ 2,658.93$ 1,227.20$ 15.34$ 81 130,353.60$ 10,862.80$ 5,013.60$ 62.67$ 25 32,697.60$ 2,724.80$ 1,257.60$ 15.72$ 82 133,598.40$ 11,133.20$ 5,138.40$ 64.23$ 26 33,508.80$ 2,792.40$ 1,288.80$ 16.11$ 83 136,947.24$ 11,412.27$ 5,267.20$ 65.84$ 27 34,361.64$ 2,863.47$ 1,321.60$ 16.52$ 84 140,358.36$ 11,696.53$ 5,398.40$ 67.48$ 28 35,214.36$ 2,934.53$ 1,354.40$ 16.93$ 85 143,873.64$ 11,989.47$ 5,533.60$ 69.17$ 29 36,087.96$ 3,007.33$ 1,388.00$ 17.35$ 86 147,471.96$ 12,289.33$ 5,672.00$ 70.90$ 30 37,003.20$ 3,083.60$ 1,423.20$ 17.79$ 87 151,153.56$ 12,596.13$ 5,813.60$ 72.67$ 31 37,918.44$ 3,159.87$ 1,458.40$ 18.23$ 88 154,939.20$ 12,911.60$ 5,959.20$ 74.49$ 32 38,875.20$ 3,239.60$ 1,495.20$ 18.69$ 89 158,808.00$ 13,234.00$ 6,108.00$ 76.35$ 33 39,852.84$ 3,321.07$ 1,532.80$ 19.16$ 90 162,780.84$ 13,565.07$ 6,260.80$ 78.26$ 34 40,830.36$ 3,402.53$ 1,570.40$ 19.63$ 91 166,857.60$ 13,904.80$ 6,417.60$ 80.22$ 35 41,849.64$ 3,487.47$ 1,609.60$ 20.12$ 92 171,017.64$ 14,251.47$ 6,577.60$ 82.22$ 36 42,910.44$ 3,575.87$ 1,650.40$ 20.63$ 93 175,302.36$ 14,608.53$ 6,742.40$ 84.28$ 37 43,971.24$ 3,664.27$ 1,691.20$ 21.14$ 94 179,691.24$ 14,974.27$ 6,911.20$ 86.39$ 38 45,073.56$ 3,756.13$ 1,733.60$ 21.67$ 95 184,163.16$ 15,346.93$ 7,083.20$ 88.54$ 39 46,196.76$ 3,849.73$ 1,776.80$ 22.21$ 96 188,780.76$ 15,731.73$ 7,260.80$ 90.76$ 40 47,361.60$ 3,946.80$ 1,821.60$ 22.77$ 97 193,502.40$ 16,125.20$ 7,442.40$ 93.03$ 41 48,547.20$ 4,045.60$ 1,867.20$ 23.34$ 98 198,327.96$ 16,527.33$ 7,628.00$ 95.35$ 42 49,753.56$ 4,146.13$ 1,913.60$ 23.92$ 99 203,299.20$ 16,941.60$ 7,819.20$ 97.74$ 43 51,001.56$ 4,250.13$ 1,961.60$ 24.52$ 100 208,374.36$ 17,364.53$ 8,014.40$ 100.18$ 44 52,270.44$ 4,355.87$ 2,010.40$ 25.13$ 101 213,574.44$ 17,797.87$ 8,214.40$ 102.68$ 45 53,580.84$ 4,465.07$ 2,060.80$ 25.76$ 102 218,919.96$ 18,243.33$ 8,420.00$ 105.25$ 46 54,932.76$ 4,577.73$ 2,112.80$ 26.41$ 103 224,390.40$ 18,699.20$ 8,630.40$ 107.88$ 47 56,305.56$ 4,692.13$ 2,165.60$ 27.07$ 104 230,006.40$ 19,167.20$ 8,846.40$ 110.58$ 48 57,699.24$ 4,808.27$ 2,219.20$ 27.74$ 105 235,747.20$ 19,645.60$ 9,067.20$ 113.34$ 49 59,155.20$ 4,929.60$ 2,275.20$ 28.44$ 106 241,633.56$ 20,136.13$ 9,293.60$ 116.17$ 50 60,632.04$ 5,052.67$ 2,332.00$ 29.15$ 107 247,665.60$ 20,638.80$ 9,525.60$ 119.07$ 51 62,150.40$ 5,179.20$ 2,390.40$ 29.88$ 108 253,863.96$ 21,155.33$ 9,764.00$ 122.05$ 52 63,689.64$ 5,307.47$ 2,449.60$ 30.62$ 109 260,208.00$ 21,684.00$ 10,008.00$ 125.10$ 53 65,291.16$ 5,440.93$ 2,511.20$ 31.39$ 110 266,718.36$ 22,226.53$ 10,258.40$ 128.23$ 54 66,913.56$ 5,576.13$ 2,573.60$ 32.17$ 111 273,395.16$ 22,782.93$ 10,515.20$ 131.44$ 55 68,598.36$ 5,716.53$ 2,638.40$ 32.98$ 112 280,238.40$ 23,353.20$ 10,778.40$ 134.73$ 56 70,304.04$ 5,858.67$ 2,704.00$ 33.80$ 113 287,247.96$ 23,937.33$ 11,048.00$ 138.10$ City of Beaumont
Salary Range Table
Effective 1/4/2022
306
Item 18.

Step Annual Monthly Bi-Weekly Hourly Step Annual Monthly Bi-Weekly Hourly 0 16,640.04$ 1,386.67$ 640.00$ 8.00$ 53 63,689.64$ 5,307.47$ 2,449.60$ 30.62$ 1 17,638.44$ 1,469.87$ 678.40$ 8.48$ 54 65,291.16$ 5,440.93$ 2,511.20$ 31.39$ 2 18,075.24$ 1,506.27$ 695.20$ 8.69$ 55 66,913.56$ 5,576.13$ 2,573.60$ 32.17$ 3 18,532.80$ 1,544.40$ 712.80$ 8.91$ 56 68,598.36$ 5,716.53$ 2,638.40$ 32.98$ 4 18,990.36$ 1,582.53$ 730.40$ 9.13$ 57 70,304.04$ 5,858.67$ 2,704.00$ 33.80$ 5 19,468.80$ 1,622.40$ 748.80$ 9.36$ 58 72,072.00$ 6,006.00$ 2,772.00$ 34.65$ 6 19,947.24$ 1,662.27$ 767.20$ 9.59$ 59 73,860.84$ 6,155.07$ 2,840.80$ 35.51$ 7 20,446.44$ 1,703.87$ 786.40$ 9.83$ 60 75,711.96$ 6,309.33$ 2,912.00$ 36.40$ 8 20,966.40$ 1,747.20$ 806.40$ 10.08$ 61 77,604.84$ 6,467.07$ 2,984.80$ 37.31$ 9 21,486.36$ 1,790.53$ 826.40$ 10.33$ 62 79,539.24$ 6,628.27$ 3,059.20$ 38.24$ 10 22,027.20$ 1,835.60$ 847.20$ 10.59$ 63 81,536.04$ 6,794.67$ 3,136.00$ 39.20$ 11 22,588.80$ 1,882.40$ 868.80$ 10.86$ 64 83,574.36$ 6,964.53$ 3,214.40$ 40.18$ 12 23,150.40$ 1,929.20$ 890.40$ 11.13$ 65 85,654.44$ 7,137.87$ 3,294.40$ 41.18$ 13 23,712.00$ 1,976.00$ 912.00$ 11.40$ 66 87,796.80$ 7,316.40$ 3,376.80$ 42.21$ 14 24,315.24$ 2,026.27$ 935.20$ 11.69$ 67 90,001.56$ 7,500.13$ 3,461.60$ 43.27$ 15 24,918.36$ 2,076.53$ 958.40$ 11.98$ 68 92,247.96$ 7,687.33$ 3,548.00$ 44.35$ 16 25,542.36$ 2,128.53$ 982.40$ 12.28$ 69 94,556.76$ 7,879.73$ 3,636.80$ 45.46$ 17 26,187.24$ 2,182.27$ 1,007.20$ 12.59$ 70 96,927.96$ 8,077.33$ 3,728.00$ 46.60$ 18 26,832.00$ 2,236.00$ 1,032.00$ 12.90$ 71 99,361.56$ 8,280.13$ 3,821.60$ 47.77$ 19 27,518.40$ 2,293.20$ 1,058.40$ 13.23$ 72 101,816.04$ 8,484.67$ 3,916.00$ 48.95$ 20 28,204.80$ 2,350.40$ 1,084.80$ 13.56$ 73 104,374.44$ 8,697.87$ 4,014.40$ 50.18$ 21 28,911.96$ 2,409.33$ 1,112.00$ 13.90$ 74 106,974.36$ 8,914.53$ 4,114.40$ 51.43$ 22 29,619.24$ 2,468.27$ 1,139.20$ 14.24$ 75 109,657.56$ 9,138.13$ 4,217.60$ 52.72$ 23 30,368.04$ 2,530.67$ 1,168.00$ 14.60$ 76 112,403.16$ 9,366.93$ 4,323.20$ 54.04$ 24 31,116.84$ 2,593.07$ 1,196.80$ 14.96$ 77 115,211.16$ 9,600.93$ 4,431.20$ 55.39$ 25 31,907.16$ 2,658.93$ 1,227.20$ 15.34$ 78 118,081.56$ 9,840.13$ 4,541.60$ 56.77$ 26 32,697.60$ 2,724.80$ 1,257.60$ 15.72$ 79 121,035.24$ 10,086.27$ 4,655.20$ 58.19$ 27 33,508.80$ 2,792.40$ 1,288.80$ 16.11$ 80 124,071.96$ 10,339.33$ 4,772.00$ 59.65$ 28 34,361.64$ 2,863.47$ 1,321.60$ 16.52$ 81 127,171.20$ 10,597.60$ 4,891.20$ 61.14$ 29 35,214.36$ 2,934.53$ 1,354.40$ 16.93$ 82 130,353.60$ 10,862.80$ 5,013.60$ 62.67$ 30 36,087.96$ 3,007.33$ 1,388.00$ 17.35$ 83 133,598.40$ 11,133.20$ 5,138.40$ 64.23$ 31 37,003.20$ 3,083.60$ 1,423.20$ 17.79$ 84 136,947.24$ 11,412.27$ 5,267.20$ 65.84$ 32 37,918.44$ 3,159.87$ 1,458.40$ 18.23$ 85 140,358.36$ 11,696.53$ 5,398.40$ 67.48$ 33 38,875.20$ 3,239.60$ 1,495.20$ 18.69$ 86 143,873.64$ 11,989.47$ 5,533.60$ 69.17$ 34 39,852.84$ 3,321.07$ 1,532.80$ 19.16$ 87 147,471.96$ 12,289.33$ 5,672.00$ 70.90$ 35 40,830.36$ 3,402.53$ 1,570.40$ 19.63$ 88 151,153.56$ 12,596.13$ 5,813.60$ 72.67$ 36 41,849.64$ 3,487.47$ 1,609.60$ 20.12$ 89 154,939.20$ 12,911.60$ 5,959.20$ 74.49$ 37 42,910.44$ 3,575.87$ 1,650.40$ 20.63$ 90 158,808.00$ 13,234.00$ 6,108.00$ 76.35$ 38 43,971.24$ 3,664.27$ 1,691.20$ 21.14$ 91 162,780.84$ 13,565.07$ 6,260.80$ 78.26$ 39 45,073.56$ 3,756.13$ 1,733.60$ 21.67$ 92 166,857.60$ 13,904.80$ 6,417.60$ 80.22$ 40 46,196.76$ 3,849.73$ 1,776.80$ 22.21$ 93 171,017.64$ 14,251.47$ 6,577.60$ 82.22$ 41 47,361.60$ 3,946.80$ 1,821.60$ 22.77$ 94 175,302.36$ 14,608.53$ 6,742.40$ 84.28$ 42 48,547.20$ 4,045.60$ 1,867.20$ 23.34$ 95 179,691.24$ 14,974.27$ 6,911.20$ 86.39$ 43 49,753.56$ 4,146.13$ 1,913.60$ 23.92$ 96 184,163.16$ 15,346.93$ 7,083.20$ 88.54$ 44 51,001.56$ 4,250.13$ 1,961.60$ 24.52$ 97 188,780.76$ 15,731.73$ 7,260.80$ 90.76$ 45 52,270.44$ 4,355.87$ 2,010.40$ 25.13$ 98 193,502.40$ 16,125.20$ 7,442.40$ 93.03$ 46 53,580.84$ 4,465.07$ 2,060.80$ 25.76$ 99 198,327.96$ 16,527.33$ 7,628.00$ 95.35$ 47 54,932.76$ 4,577.73$ 2,112.80$ 26.41$ 100 203,299.20$ 16,941.60$ 7,819.20$ 97.74$ 48 56,305.56$ 4,692.13$ 2,165.60$ 27.07$ 101 208,374.36$ 17,364.53$ 8,014.40$ 100.18$ 49 57,699.24$ 4,808.27$ 2,219.20$ 27.74$ 102 213,574.44$ 17,797.87$ 8,214.40$ 102.68$ 50 59,155.20$ 4,929.60$ 2,275.20$ 28.44$ 103 218,919.96$ 18,243.33$ 8,420.00$ 105.25$ 51 60,632.04$ 5,052.67$ 2,332.00$ 29.15$ 104 224,390.40$ 18,699.20$ 8,630.40$ 107.88$ 52 62,150.40$ 5,179.20$ 2,390.40$ 29.88$ 105 230,006.40$ 19,167.20$ 8,846.40$ 110.58$ City of Beaumont
Salary Range Table
Effective January 1, 2014
307
Item 18.

Salary Minimum Minimum Minimum Minimum Salary Minimum Minimum Minimum Minimum Salary Minimum Minimum Minimum Minimum Range Annual Monthly Bi-Weekly Hourly Range Annual Monthly Bi-Weekly Hourly Range Annual Monthly Bi-Weekly Hourly 0 16,640.04 1,386.67 640.00 8.00 35 40,830.36 3,402.53 1,570.40 19.63 70 96,927.96 8,077.33 3,728.00 46.60 1 17,638.44 1,469.87 678.40 8.48 36 41,849.64 3,487.47 1,609.60 20.12 71 99,361.56 8,280.13 3,821.60 47.77 2 18,075.24 1,506.27 695.20 8.69 37 42,910.44 3,575.87 1,650.40 20.63 72 101,816.04 8,484.67 3,916.00 48.95 3 18,532.80 1,544.40 712.80 8.91 38 43,971.24 3,664.27 1,691.20 21.14 73 104,374.44 8,697.87 4,014.40 50.18 4 18,990.36 1,582.53 730.40 9.13 39 45,073.56 3,756.13 1,733.60 21.67 74 106,974.36 8,914.53 4,114.40 51.43 5 19,468.80 1,622.40 748.80 9.36 40 46,196.76 3,849.73 1,776.80 22.21 75 109,657.56 9,138.13 4,217.60 52.72 6 19,947.24 1,662.27 767.20 9.59 41 47,361.60 3,946.80 1,821.60 22.77 76 112,403.16 9,366.93 4,323.20 54.04 7 20,446.44 1,703.87 786.40 9.83 42 48,547.20 4,045.60 1,867.20 23.34 77 115,211.16 9,600.93 4,431.20 55.39 8 20,966.40 1,747.20 806.40 10.08 43 49,753.56 4,146.13 1,913.60 23.92 78 118,081.56 9,840.13 4,541.60 56.77 9 21,486.36 1,790.53 826.40 10.33 44 51,001.56 4,250.13 1,961.60 24.52 79 121,035.24 10,086.27 4,655.20 58.19 10 22,027.20 1,835.60 847.20 10.59 45 52,270.44 4,355.87 2,010.40 25.13 80 124,071.96 10,339.33 4,772.00 59.65 11 22,588.80 1,882.40 868.80 10.86 46 53,580.84 4,465.07 2,060.80 25.76 81 127,171.20 10,597.60 4,891.20 61.14 12 23,150.40 1,929.20 890.40 11.13 47 54,932.76 4,577.73 2,112.80 26.41 82 130,353.60 10,862.80 5,013.60 62.67 13 23,712.00 1,976.00 912.00 11.40 48 56,305.56 4,692.13 2,165.60 27.07 83 133,598.40 11,133.20 5,138.40 64.23 14 24,315.24 2,026.27 935.20 11.69 49 57,699.24 4,808.27 2,219.20 27.74 84 136,947.24 11,412.27 5,267.20 65.84 15 24,918.36 2,076.53 958.40 11.98 50 59,155.20 4,929.60 2,275.20 28.44 85 140,358.36 11,696.53 5,398.40 67.48 16 25,542.36 2,128.53 982.40 12.28 51 60,632.04 5,052.67 2,332.00 29.15 86 143,873.64 11,989.47 5,533.60 69.17 17 26,187.24 2,182.27 1,007.20 12.59 52 62,150.40 5,179.20 2,390.40 29.88 87 147,471.96 12,289.33 5,672.00 70.90 18 26,832.00 2,236.00 1,032.00 12.90 53 63,689.64 5,307.47 2,449.60 30.62 88 151,153.56 12,596.13 5,813.60 72.67 19 27,518.40 2,293.20 1,058.40 13.23 54 65,291.16 5,440.93 2,511.20 31.39 89 154,939.20 12,911.60 5,959.20 74.49 20 28,204.80 2,350.40 1,084.80 13.56 55 66,913.56 5,576.13 2,573.60 32.17 90 158,808.00 13,234.00 6,108.00 76.35 21 28,911.96 2,409.33 1,112.00 13.90 56 68,598.36 5,716.53 2,638.40 32.98 91 162,780.84 13,565.07 6,260.80 78.26 22 29,619.24 2,468.27 1,139.20 14.24 57 70,304.04 5,858.67 2,704.00 33.80 92 166,857.60 13,904.80 6,417.60 80.22 23 30,368.04 2,530.67 1,168.00 14.60 58 72,072.00 6,006.00 2,772.00 34.65 93 171,017.64 14,251.47 6,577.60 82.22 24 31,116.84 2,593.07 1,196.80 14.96 59 73,860.84 6,155.07 2,840.80 35.51 94 175,302.36 14,608.53 6,742.40 84.28 25 31,907.16 2,658.93 1,227.20 15.34 60 75,711.96 6,309.33 2,912.00 36.40 95 179,691.24 14,974.27 6,911.20 86.39 26 32,697.60 2,724.80 1,257.60 15.72 61 77,604.84 6,467.07 2,984.80 37.31 96 184,163.16 15,346.93 7,083.20 88.54 27 33,508.80 2,792.40 1,288.80 16.11 62 79,539.24 6,628.27 3,059.20 38.24 97 188,780.76 15,731.73 7,260.80 90.76 28 34,361.64 2,863.47 1,321.60 16.52 63 81,536.04 6,794.67 3,136.00 39.20 98 193,502.40 16,125.20 7,442.40 93.03 29 35,214.36 2,934.53 1,354.40 16.93 64 83,574.36 6,964.53 3,214.40 40.18 99 198,327.96 16,527.33 7,628.00 95.35 30 36,087.96 3,007.33 1,388.00 17.35 65 85,654.44 7,137.87 3,294.40 41.18 100 203,299.20 16,941.60 7,819.20 97.74 31 37,003.20 3,083.60 1,423.20 17.79 66 87,796.80 7,316.40 3,376.80 42.21 101 208,374.36 17,364.53 8,014.40 100.18 32 37,918.44 3,159.87 1,458.40 18.23 67 90,001.56 7,500.13 3,461.60 43.27 102 213,574.44 17,797.87 8,214.40 102.68 33 38,875.20 3,239.60 1,495.20 18.69 68 92,247.96 7,687.33 3,548.00 44.35 103 218,919.96 18,243.33 8,420.00 105.25 34 39,852.84 3,321.07 1,532.80 19.16 69 94,556.76 7,879.73 3,636.80 45.46 104 224,390.40 18,699.20 8,630.40 107.88 City of Beaumont
Salary Range Table
Effective January 8, 2010
308
Item 18.

Step Annual Monthly Bi-Weekly Hourly Step Annual Monthly Bi-Weekly Hourly Step Annual Monthly Bi-Weekly Hourly 0 16,640.04$ 1,386.67$ 640.00$ 8.00$ 38 43,971.24$ 3,664.27$ 1,691.20$ 21.14$ 76 112,403.16$ 9,366.93$ 4,323.20$ 54.04$ 1 17,638.44$ 1,469.87$ 678.40$ 8.48$ 39 45,073.56$ 3,756.13$ 1,733.60$ 21.67$ 77 115,211.16$ 9,600.93$ 4,431.20$ 55.39$ 2 18,075.24$ 1,506.27$ 695.20$ 8.69$ 40 46,196.76$ 3,849.73$ 1,776.80$ 22.21$ 78 118,081.56$ 9,840.13$ 4,541.60$ 56.77$ 3 18,532.80$ 1,544.40$ 712.80$ 8.91$ 41 47,361.60$ 3,946.80$ 1,821.60$ 22.77$ 79 121,035.24$ 10,086.27$ 4,655.20$ 58.19$ 4 18,990.36$ 1,582.53$ 730.40$ 9.13$ 42 48,547.20$ 4,045.60$ 1,867.20$ 23.34$ 80 124,071.96$ 10,339.33$ 4,772.00$ 59.65$ 5 19,468.80$ 1,622.40$ 748.80$ 9.36$ 43 49,753.56$ 4,146.13$ 1,913.60$ 23.92$ 81 127,171.20$ 10,597.60$ 4,891.20$ 61.14$ 6 19,947.24$ 1,662.27$ 767.20$ 9.59$ 44 51,001.56$ 4,250.13$ 1,961.60$ 24.52$ 82 130,353.60$ 10,862.80$ 5,013.60$ 62.67$ 7 20,446.44$ 1,703.87$ 786.40$ 9.83$ 45 52,270.44$ 4,355.87$ 2,010.40$ 25.13$ 83 133,598.40$ 11,133.20$ 5,138.40$ 64.23$ 8 20,966.40$ 1,747.20$ 806.40$ 10.08$ 46 53,580.84$ 4,465.07$ 2,060.80$ 25.76$ 84 136,947.24$ 11,412.27$ 5,267.20$ 65.84$ 9 21,486.36$ 1,790.53$ 826.40$ 10.33$ 47 54,932.76$ 4,577.73$ 2,112.80$ 26.41$ 85 140,358.36$ 11,696.53$ 5,398.40$ 67.48$ 10 22,027.20$ 1,835.60$ 847.20$ 10.59$ 48 56,305.56$ 4,692.13$ 2,165.60$ 27.07$ 86 143,873.64$ 11,989.47$ 5,533.60$ 69.17$ 11 22,588.80$ 1,882.40$ 868.80$ 10.86$ 49 57,699.24$ 4,808.27$ 2,219.20$ 27.74$ 87 147,471.96$ 12,289.33$ 5,672.00$ 70.90$ 12 23,150.40$ 1,929.20$ 890.40$ 11.13$ 50 59,155.20$ 4,929.60$ 2,275.20$ 28.44$ 88 151,153.56$ 12,596.13$ 5,813.60$ 72.67$ 13 23,712.00$ 1,976.00$ 912.00$ 11.40$ 51 60,632.04$ 5,052.67$ 2,332.00$ 29.15$ 89 154,939.20$ 12,911.60$ 5,959.20$ 74.49$ 14 24,315.24$ 2,026.27$ 935.20$ 11.69$ 52 62,150.40$ 5,179.20$ 2,390.40$ 29.88$ 90 158,808.00$ 13,234.00$ 6,108.00$ 76.35$ 15 24,918.36$ 2,076.53$ 958.40$ 11.98$ 53 63,689.64$ 5,307.47$ 2,449.60$ 30.62$ 91 162,780.84$ 13,565.07$ 6,260.80$ 78.26$ 16 25,542.36$ 2,128.53$ 982.40$ 12.28$ 54 65,291.16$ 5,440.93$ 2,511.20$ 31.39$ 92 166,857.60$ 13,904.80$ 6,417.60$ 80.22$ 17 26,187.24$ 2,182.27$ 1,007.20$ 12.59$ 55 66,913.56$ 5,576.13$ 2,573.60$ 32.17$ 93 171,017.64$ 14,251.47$ 6,577.60$ 82.22$ 18 26,832.00$ 2,236.00$ 1,032.00$ 12.90$ 56 68,598.36$ 5,716.53$ 2,638.40$ 32.98$ 94 175,302.36$ 14,608.53$ 6,742.40$ 84.28$ 19 27,518.40$ 2,293.20$ 1,058.40$ 13.23$ 57 70,304.04$ 5,858.67$ 2,704.00$ 33.80$ 95 179,691.24$ 14,974.27$ 6,911.20$ 86.39$ 20 28,204.80$ 2,350.40$ 1,084.80$ 13.56$ 58 72,072.00$ 6,006.00$ 2,772.00$ 34.65$ 96 184,163.16$ 15,346.93$ 7,083.20$ 88.54$ 21 28,911.96$ 2,409.33$ 1,112.00$ 13.90$ 59 73,860.84$ 6,155.07$ 2,840.80$ 35.51$ 97 188,780.76$ 15,731.73$ 7,260.80$ 90.76$ 22 29,619.24$ 2,468.27$ 1,139.20$ 14.24$ 60 75,711.96$ 6,309.33$ 2,912.00$ 36.40$ 98 193,502.40$ 16,125.20$ 7,442.40$ 93.03$ 23 30,368.04$ 2,530.67$ 1,168.00$ 14.60$ 61 77,604.84$ 6,467.07$ 2,984.80$ 37.31$ 99 198,327.96$ 16,527.33$ 7,628.00$ 95.35$ 24 31,116.84$ 2,593.07$ 1,196.80$ 14.96$ 62 79,539.24$ 6,628.27$ 3,059.20$ 38.24$ 100 203,299.20$ 16,941.60$ 7,819.20$ 97.74$ 25 31,907.16$ 2,658.93$ 1,227.20$ 15.34$ 63 81,536.04$ 6,794.67$ 3,136.00$ 39.20$ 101 208,374.36$ 17,364.53$ 8,014.40$ 100.18$ 26 32,697.60$ 2,724.80$ 1,257.60$ 15.72$ 64 83,574.36$ 6,964.53$ 3,214.40$ 40.18$ 102 213,574.44$ 17,797.87$ 8,214.40$ 102.68$ 27 33,508.80$ 2,792.40$ 1,288.80$ 16.11$ 65 85,654.44$ 7,137.87$ 3,294.40$ 41.18$ 103 218,919.96$ 18,243.33$ 8,420.00$ 105.25$ 28 34,361.64$ 2,863.47$ 1,321.60$ 16.52$ 66 87,796.80$ 7,316.40$ 3,376.80$ 42.21$ 104 224,390.40$ 18,699.20$ 8,630.40$ 107.88$ 29 35,214.36$ 2,934.53$ 1,354.40$ 16.93$ 67 90,001.56$ 7,500.13$ 3,461.60$ 43.27$ 105 230,006.40$ 19,167.20$ 8,846.40$ 110.58$ 30 36,087.96$ 3,007.33$ 1,388.00$ 17.35$ 68 92,247.96$ 7,687.33$ 3,548.00$ 44.35$ 106 235,747.20$ 19,645.60$ 9,067.20$ 113.34$ 31 37,003.20$ 3,083.60$ 1,423.20$ 17.79$ 69 94,556.76$ 7,879.73$ 3,636.80$ 45.46$ 107 241,633.56$ 20,136.13$ 9,293.60$ 116.17$ 32 37,918.44$ 3,159.87$ 1,458.40$ 18.23$ 70 96,927.96$ 8,077.33$ 3,728.00$ 46.60$ 108 247,665.60$ 20,638.80$ 9,525.60$ 119.07$ 33 38,875.20$ 3,239.60$ 1,495.20$ 18.69$ 71 99,361.56$ 8,280.13$ 3,821.60$ 47.77$ 109 253,863.96$ 21,155.33$ 9,764.00$ 122.05$ 34 39,852.84$ 3,321.07$ 1,532.80$ 19.16$ 72 101,816.04$ 8,484.67$ 3,916.00$ 48.95$ 110 260,208.00$ 21,684.00$ 10,008.00$ 125.10$ 35 40,830.36$ 3,402.53$ 1,570.40$ 19.63$ 73 104,374.44$ 8,697.87$ 4,014.40$ 50.18$ 111 266,718.36$ 22,226.53$ 10,258.40$ 128.23$ 36 41,849.64$ 3,487.47$ 1,609.60$ 20.12$ 74 106,974.36$ 8,914.53$ 4,114.40$ 51.43$ 112 273,395.16$ 22,782.93$ 10,515.20$ 131.44$ 37 42,910.44$ 3,575.87$ 1,650.40$ 20.63$ 75 109,657.56$ 9,138.13$ 4,217.60$ 52.72$ City of Beaumont
Salary Range Table
Effective January 1, 2014
309
Item 18.

Step Annual Monthly Bi-Weekly Hourly Step Annual Monthly Bi-Weekly Hourly 0 16,640.04$ 1,386.67$ 640.00$ 8.00$ 57 70,304.04$ 5,858.67$ 2,704.00$ 33.80$ 1 17,638.44$ 1,469.87$ 678.40$ 8.48$ 58 72,072.00$ 6,006.00$ 2,772.00$ 34.65$ 2 18,075.24$ 1,506.27$ 695.20$ 8.69$ 59 73,860.84$ 6,155.07$ 2,840.80$ 35.51$ 3 18,532.80$ 1,544.40$ 712.80$ 8.91$ 60 75,711.96$ 6,309.33$ 2,912.00$ 36.40$ 4 18,990.36$ 1,582.53$ 730.40$ 9.13$ 61 77,604.84$ 6,467.07$ 2,984.80$ 37.31$ 5 19,468.80$ 1,622.40$ 748.80$ 9.36$ 62 79,539.24$ 6,628.27$ 3,059.20$ 38.24$ 6 19,947.24$ 1,662.27$ 767.20$ 9.59$ 63 81,536.04$ 6,794.67$ 3,136.00$ 39.20$ 7 20,446.44$ 1,703.87$ 786.40$ 9.83$ 64 83,574.36$ 6,964.53$ 3,214.40$ 40.18$ 8 20,966.40$ 1,747.20$ 806.40$ 10.08$ 65 85,654.44$ 7,137.87$ 3,294.40$ 41.18$ 9 21,486.36$ 1,790.53$ 826.40$ 10.33$ 66 87,796.80$ 7,316.40$ 3,376.80$ 42.21$ 10 22,027.20$ 1,835.60$ 847.20$ 10.59$ 67 90,001.56$ 7,500.13$ 3,461.60$ 43.27$ 11 22,588.80$ 1,882.40$ 868.80$ 10.86$ 68 92,247.96$ 7,687.33$ 3,548.00$ 44.35$ 12 23,150.40$ 1,929.20$ 890.40$ 11.13$ 69 94,556.76$ 7,879.73$ 3,636.80$ 45.46$ 13 23,712.00$ 1,976.00$ 912.00$ 11.40$ 70 96,927.96$ 8,077.33$ 3,728.00$ 46.60$ 14 24,315.24$ 2,026.27$ 935.20$ 11.69$ 71 99,361.56$ 8,280.13$ 3,821.60$ 47.77$ 15 24,918.36$ 2,076.53$ 958.40$ 11.98$ 72 101,816.04$ 8,484.67$ 3,916.00$ 48.95$ 16 25,542.36$ 2,128.53$ 982.40$ 12.28$ 73 104,374.44$ 8,697.87$ 4,014.40$ 50.18$ 17 26,187.24$ 2,182.27$ 1,007.20$ 12.59$ 74 106,974.36$ 8,914.53$ 4,114.40$ 51.43$ 18 26,832.00$ 2,236.00$ 1,032.00$ 12.90$ 75 109,657.56$ 9,138.13$ 4,217.60$ 52.72$ 19 27,518.40$ 2,293.20$ 1,058.40$ 13.23$ 76 112,403.16$ 9,366.93$ 4,323.20$ 54.04$ 20 28,204.80$ 2,350.40$ 1,084.80$ 13.56$ 77 115,211.16$ 9,600.93$ 4,431.20$ 55.39$ 21 28,911.96$ 2,409.33$ 1,112.00$ 13.90$ 78 118,081.56$ 9,840.13$ 4,541.60$ 56.77$ 22 29,619.24$ 2,468.27$ 1,139.20$ 14.24$ 79 121,035.24$ 10,086.27$ 4,655.20$ 58.19$ 23 30,368.04$ 2,530.67$ 1,168.00$ 14.60$ 80 124,071.96$ 10,339.33$ 4,772.00$ 59.65$ 24 31,116.84$ 2,593.07$ 1,196.80$ 14.96$ 81 127,171.20$ 10,597.60$ 4,891.20$ 61.14$ 25 31,907.16$ 2,658.93$ 1,227.20$ 15.34$ 82 130,353.60$ 10,862.80$ 5,013.60$ 62.67$ 26 32,697.60$ 2,724.80$ 1,257.60$ 15.72$ 83 133,598.40$ 11,133.20$ 5,138.40$ 64.23$ 27 33,508.80$ 2,792.40$ 1,288.80$ 16.11$ 84 136,947.24$ 11,412.27$ 5,267.20$ 65.84$ 28 34,361.64$ 2,863.47$ 1,321.60$ 16.52$ 85 140,358.36$ 11,696.53$ 5,398.40$ 67.48$ 29 35,214.36$ 2,934.53$ 1,354.40$ 16.93$ 86 143,873.64$ 11,989.47$ 5,533.60$ 69.17$ 30 36,087.96$ 3,007.33$ 1,388.00$ 17.35$ 87 147,471.96$ 12,289.33$ 5,672.00$ 70.90$ 31 37,003.20$ 3,083.60$ 1,423.20$ 17.79$ 88 151,153.56$ 12,596.13$ 5,813.60$ 72.67$ 32 37,918.44$ 3,159.87$ 1,458.40$ 18.23$ 89 154,939.20$ 12,911.60$ 5,959.20$ 74.49$ 33 38,875.20$ 3,239.60$ 1,495.20$ 18.69$ 90 158,808.00$ 13,234.00$ 6,108.00$ 76.35$ 34 39,852.84$ 3,321.07$ 1,532.80$ 19.16$ 91 162,780.84$ 13,565.07$ 6,260.80$ 78.26$ 35 40,830.36$ 3,402.53$ 1,570.40$ 19.63$ 92 166,857.60$ 13,904.80$ 6,417.60$ 80.22$ 36 41,849.64$ 3,487.47$ 1,609.60$ 20.12$ 93 171,017.64$ 14,251.47$ 6,577.60$ 82.22$ 37 42,910.44$ 3,575.87$ 1,650.40$ 20.63$ 94 175,302.36$ 14,608.53$ 6,742.40$ 84.28$ 38 43,971.24$ 3,664.27$ 1,691.20$ 21.14$ 95 179,691.24$ 14,974.27$ 6,911.20$ 86.39$ 39 45,073.56$ 3,756.13$ 1,733.60$ 21.67$ 96 184,163.16$ 15,346.93$ 7,083.20$ 88.54$ 40 46,196.76$ 3,849.73$ 1,776.80$ 22.21$ 97 188,780.76$ 15,731.73$ 7,260.80$ 90.76$ 41 47,361.60$ 3,946.80$ 1,821.60$ 22.77$ 98 193,502.40$ 16,125.20$ 7,442.40$ 93.03$ 42 48,547.20$ 4,045.60$ 1,867.20$ 23.34$ 99 198,327.96$ 16,527.33$ 7,628.00$ 95.35$ 43 49,753.56$ 4,146.13$ 1,913.60$ 23.92$ 100 203,299.20$ 16,941.60$ 7,819.20$ 97.74$ 44 51,001.56$ 4,250.13$ 1,961.60$ 24.52$ 101 208,374.36$ 17,364.53$ 8,014.40$ 100.18$ 45 52,270.44$ 4,355.87$ 2,010.40$ 25.13$ 102 213,574.44$ 17,797.87$ 8,214.40$ 102.68$ 46 53,580.84$ 4,465.07$ 2,060.80$ 25.76$ 103 218,919.96$ 18,243.33$ 8,420.00$ 105.25$ 47 54,932.76$ 4,577.73$ 2,112.80$ 26.41$ 104 224,390.40$ 18,699.20$ 8,630.40$ 107.88$ 48 56,305.56$ 4,692.13$ 2,165.60$ 27.07$ 105 230,006.40$ 19,167.20$ 8,846.40$ 110.58$ 49 57,699.24$ 4,808.27$ 2,219.20$ 27.74$ 106 235,747.20$ 19,645.60$ 9,067.20$ 113.34$ 50 59,155.20$ 4,929.60$ 2,275.20$ 28.44$ 107 241,633.56$ 20,136.13$ 9,293.60$ 116.17$ 51 60,632.04$ 5,052.67$ 2,332.00$ 29.15$ 108 247,665.60$ 20,638.80$ 9,525.60$ 119.07$ 52 62,150.40$ 5,179.20$ 2,390.40$ 29.88$ 109 253,863.96$ 21,155.33$ 9,764.00$ 122.05$ 53 63,689.64$ 5,307.47$ 2,449.60$ 30.62$ 110 260,208.00$ 21,684.00$ 10,008.00$ 125.10$ 54 65,291.16$ 5,440.93$ 2,511.20$ 31.39$ 111 266,718.36$ 22,226.53$ 10,258.40$ 128.23$ 55 66,913.56$ 5,576.13$ 2,573.60$ 32.17$ 112 273,395.16$ 22,782.93$ 10,515.20$ 131.44$ 56 68,598.36$ 5,716.53$ 2,638.40$ 32.98$
City of Beaumont
Salary Range Table
Effective January 1, 2014
310
Item 18.

Ralph Andersen & Associates Data Effective June 2021
Beaumont
Labor Market Summary - Median Total Compensation
Class Title # of
Obs.Base Base +
Cash
Gain/
Loss
Base +
Cash +
Insurance
Gain/
Loss
Total Comp
(Cash + Ins.
+ Ret.)
Gain/
Loss
Total
Gain/
Loss
Account Technician 12 9.6%16.9%7.3%14.5%-2.5%11.0%-3.5%1.4% Administrative Services Director 13 -12.6%-20.8%-8.2%-19.8%1.0%-11.1%8.7%1.5% Administrative Services Manager 8 -20.8%-24.6%-3.8%-19.1%5.5%-23.6%-4.5%-2.7% Animal Control Officer II 7 27.3%32.7%5.3%27.3%-5.4%15.8%-11.4%-11.5% Assistant City Manager 9 7.6%2.3%-5.2%1.4%-0.9%-1.3%-2.7%-8.9% Assistant Director of Public Works/ Assistant City Engineer 7 -5.3%-5.3%0.0%-5.5%-0.2%-13.9%-8.3%-8.6% Associate Planner - Drift Check 13
Building Inspector 12 5.6%9.3%3.6%9.5%0.2%8.6%-0.8%3.0% Building Permit Technician II 13 12.0%11.6%-0.4%12.7%1.1%10.8%-1.9%-1.2% Building Plans Examiner 11 -1.5%4.1%5.6%9.2%5.2%5.9%-3.4%7.4% Building/Grounds/Maintenance Supervisor 12 1.5%0.5%-1.0%-0.7%-1.2%0.6%1.4%-0.8% Building/Grounds/Maintenance Worker 13 -0.3%8.7%9.0%8.5%-0.2%4.8%-3.7%5.1% Bus Driver I 5 -2.1%7.2%9.3%9.4%2.2%8.3%-1.2%10.4%
Chief Building Official 11 19.7%15.0%-4.7%12.6%-2.4%13.7%1.1%-6.0% Chief of Police 12 -2.8%-9.4%-6.6%-11.9%-2.5%-16.2%-4.3%-13.3% Chief Plant Operator – Wastewater 4 28.1%25.7%-2.4%25.1%-0.6%22.2%-2.9%-5.9% City Engineer / Public Works Director 13 8.0%5.4%-2.6%4.3%-1.1%1.2%-3.1%-6.8% City Manager 13 8.4%8.5%0.1%7.1%-1.5%-0.9%-8.0%-9.4%
Community Development Director 13 -7.2%-10.4%-3.3%-10.0%0.5%-16.1%-6.1%-8.9% Community Enhancement Officer II 13 12.6%10.0%-2.7%8.5%-1.5%8.4%0.0%-4.2% Community Services Coordinator - Drift Check 8
Community Services Director 9 -1.4%-2.6%-1.1%-6.0%-3.5%-10.9%-4.9%-9.5% Community Services Manager 11 -8.9%-19.5%-10.6%-10.8%8.6%-19.7%-8.8%-10.8% Customer Service Coordinator II 8 11.5%17.4%5.9%19.5%2.1%18.2%-1.3%6.6% Deputy City Clerk 4 30.8%29.1%-1.7%21.6%-7.4%23.6%2.0%-7.2% Economic Development Manager 12 3.1%0.2%-3.0%2.4%2.3%-3.9%-6.4%-7.1% Engineering Development Technician II 13 3.5%6.0%2.6%8.4%2.4%2.3%-6.1%-1.2% Executive Assistant 13 -4.3%-13.3%-8.9%-8.1%5.1%-13.4%-5.3%-9.0% Finance Director 13 -13.7%-21.2%-7.5%-19.8%1.3%-23.3%-3.4%-9.6% HR/Payroll Technician 13 -4.0%5.2%9.2%2.8%-2.4%6.5%3.7%10.4% Information Technology Manager 12 -13.1%-21.2%-8.2%-17.0%4.2%-24.2%-7.2%-11.2% IT Analyst II 12 -18.5%-9.8%8.7%-7.0%2.9%-12.4%-5.4%6.1% Management Analyst 12 8.8%13.4%4.5%12.6%-0.8%9.3%-3.3%0.5% Mechanic 12 8.6%12.2%3.5%14.8%2.7%14.1%-0.7%5.5%
Print Date: 1/26/2022
311
Item 18.

Ralph Andersen & Associates Data Effective June 2021
Beaumont
Account Technician 12 Cash Supplements Insurance Benefits Survey Agency Comparable Class Range
Max.Long.Uniform Educ.

Inc.

Def.

Comp.

Ret.

Pickup
Base +
Cash Health Dental Vision Life LTD
Base +
Cash +
Ins.

Banning Accounting Specialist $4,909 $4,909 $1,400 inc $21 inc $6,330 Cathedral City No Comparable Class
Colton Account Technician II $4,452 $89 $223 $4,764 $1,100 inc inc $8 $20 $5,893 Corona Accounting Technician II $4,255 $83 $4,338 $1,564 inc inc $0 $29 $5,931 Menifee Accounting Technician II $5,536 $5,536 $1,800 inc inc $13 $7,348 Murrieta Accounting Specialist $4,929 $100 $5,029 $1,563 $98 $40 $8 $34 $6,771 Palm Springs Account Specialist $5,394 $270 $5,664 $2,106 inc inc $11 $20 $7,801 Redlands Accounting Technician II $4,538 $227 $4,765 $900 $127 $19 $5,811 Rialto Accounting Technician $5,518 $331 $414 $600 $6,863 $1,300 inc inc $8,163 Riverside Accounting Technician $5,161 $5,161 $1,411 $45 inc $3 $6,620 San Bernardino Accounting Technician $4,607 $4,607 $880 inc inc $1 $8 $5,496 Temecula Accounting Technician II $6,127 $245 $6,372 $1,600 inc inc $7,972 Upland Accounting Technician $5,153 $232 $100 $5,485 $1,267 inc inc $6,752 Beaumont Accounting Technician $5,576 $558 $6,134 $1,675 inc inc $7 $7,816 Average $5,048 $5,291 $6,741
% +/-9.5%13.7%13.8%
Median $5,041 $5,095 $6,686
12 % +/-9.6%16.9%14.5%
75th Percenile $5,425 $5,568 $7,461
13 % +/-2.7%9.2%4.5%
Median Gain/Loss 7.3%-2.5%
3 Print Date: 1/26/2022 313
Item 18.

Ralph Andersen & Associates Data Effective June 2021
Beaumont
Account Technician
Survey Agency Comparable Class
Banning Accounting Specialist
Cathedral City No Comparable Class
Colton Account Technician II
Corona Accounting Technician II
Menifee Accounting Technician II
Murrieta Accounting Specialist
Palm Springs Account Specialist
Redlands Accounting Technician II
Rialto Accounting Technician
Riverside Accounting Technician
San Bernardino Accounting Technician
Temecula Accounting Technician II
Upland Accounting Technician
Beaumont Accounting Technician
Average
% +/-
Median
12 % +/-
75th Percenile
13 % +/-
Retirement Benefits Leave Benefits
Emp. Ret.EE Cont
to ER Ret. Form.

Base +
Cash +
Ins. + Ret.

Hol Sick Admin Vac
Max
Total
Leave
$1,512 2@60 $7,842 11 8 13 32
$1,474 2.5@55 $7,366 11 8 13 32
$2,409 2.7@55 $8,340 8 21 29
$866 2.7@55 $8,215 10 9 13 32
$499 2@60 $7,270 9 23 32
$1,894 2@60 $9,694 10 21 31
$1,183 2@55 $6,994 11 8 17 35
$2,608 2.7@55 $10,771 12 10 23 44
$1,640 2.7@55 $8,259 8 8 13 29
$1,994 ($60)2@55 $7,430 11 8 17 35
$2,110 2@60 $10,082 8 23 31
$2,378 ($72)2.5@55 $9,058 11 8 15 34
$1,439 3@60 $9,255 9 8 17 34
$8,444 33.0

8.8%2.9%
$8,237 32.1

11.0%5.6%
$9,217 33.9

0.4%0.2%
-3.5%
4 Print Date: 1/26/2022 314
Item 18.

Ralph Andersen & Associates Data Effective June 2021
Beaumont
Administrative Services Director 13 Cash Supplements Insurance Benefits Survey Agency Comparable Class Range
Max.Long.Uniform Educ.

Inc.

Def.

Comp.

Ret.

Pickup
Base +
Cash Health Dental Vision Life LTD
Base +
Cash +
Ins.

Banning Administrative Services Director/Dep CM $15,183 $275 $15,458 $1,667 inc $21 $39 $17,184 Cathedral City Administrative Services Director $18,502 $2,775 $925 $100 $1,295 $23,598 $2,300 inc inc $80 $44 $26,022 Colton Human Resources Director $14,100 $14,100 $1,183 inc inc $17 $63 $15,363 Corona ACM/Administrative Services Director $18,715 $167 $18,882 $1,564 inc inc $0 $127 $20,573 Menifee Deputy City Manager $18,142 $18,142 $1,800 inc inc $17 $19,959 Murrieta Administrative Services Director $18,034 $250 $18,284 $1,563 $98 $40 $36 $123 $20,143 Palm Springs Director of Human Resources $14,408 $720 $15,128 $2,094 inc inc $11 $179 $17,412 Redlands Assistant City Manager $17,738 $355 $18,093 $2,706 $127 $19 $20,945 Rialto Director of Human Resources/Risk Mgmt $14,454 $1,084 $750 $16,288 $1,300 $137 $25 $17,750 Riverside Human Resources Director $19,339 $75 $19,414 $1,482 $45 inc $111 $21,052 San Bernardino Director of Human Resources $14,509 $14,509 $1,250 inc inc $16 $25 $15,800 Temecula Director of HR/Risk Management $14,903 $1,043 $15,946 $1,600 inc inc $17,546 Upland Asst City Manager (Administrative Services)$16,858 $421 $1,517 $18,797 $1,184 inc inc $19,981 Beaumont Administrative Services Director $14,974 $14,974 $1,675 inc inc $7 $16,656 Average $16,530 $17,434 $19,210
% +/--10.4%-16.4%-15.3%
Median $16,858 $18,093 $19,959
13 % +/--12.6%-20.8%-19.8%
75th Percenile $18,142 $18,797 $20,573
13 % +/--21.2%-25.5%-23.5%
Median Gain/Loss -8.2%1.0%
5 Print Date: 1/26/2022 315
Item 18.

Ralph Andersen & Associates Data Effective June 2021
Beaumont
Administrative Services Director
Survey Agency Comparable Class
Banning Administrative Services Director/Dep CM
Cathedral City Administrative Services Director
Colton Human Resources Director
Corona ACM/Administrative Services Director
Menifee Deputy City Manager
Murrieta Administrative Services Director
Palm Springs Director of Human Resources
Redlands Assistant City Manager
Rialto Director of Human Resources/Risk Mgmt
Riverside Human Resources Director
San Bernardino Director of Human Resources
Temecula Director of HR/Risk Management
Upland Asst City Manager (Administrative Services)
Beaumont Administrative Services Director
Average
% +/-
Median
13 % +/-
75th Percenile
13 % +/-
Retirement Benefits Leave Benefits
Emp. Ret.EE Cont
to ER Ret. Form.

Base +
Cash +
Ins. + Ret.

Hol Sick Admin Vac
Max
Total
Leave
$4,676 2@60 $21,861 11 8 8 13 40
$1,703 ($1,665)2@60 $26,059 12 8 18 38
$4,666 2.5@55 $20,029 12 8 7 13 40
$10,596 2.7@55 $31,168 8 9 25 42
$2,840 2.7@55 $22,799 10 9 5 13 37
$1,826 2@60 $21,968 9 10 23 42
$5,058 2@60 $22,470 10 4 21 35
$4,623 2@55 $25,568 9 33 42
$6,833 2.7@55 $24,583 10 10 12 20 52
$6,144 2.7@55 $27,196 8 8 4 17 37
$6,281 ($334)2@55 $21,747 11 8 7 17 42
$5,133 ($447)2@60 $22,232 8 7 24 39
$7,781 ($236)2.5@55 $27,526 11 8 7 15 40
$3,865 3@60 $20,521 9 8 3 17 37
$24,247 40.3
-18.2%-8.0%
$22,799 40.2
-11.1%-7.6%
$26,059 41.7
-27.0%-11.6%

8.7%
6 Print Date: 1/26/2022 316
Item 18.

Ralph Andersen & Associates Data Effective June 2021
Beaumont
Administrative Services Manager 8 Cash Supplements Insurance Benefits Survey Agency Comparable Class Range
Max.Long.Uniform Educ.

Inc.

Def.

Comp.

Ret.

Pickup
Base +
Cash Health Dental Vision Life LTD
Base +
Cash +
Ins.

Banning Human Resources/Risk Manager $10,501 $275 $10,776 $1,400 inc $21 $39 $12,236 Cathedral City Human Resources Manager $13,807 $2,071 $690 $100 $966 $17,635 $2,300 inc inc $60 $33 $20,028 Colton No Comparable Class
Corona Human Resources Manager II $9,786 $167 $9,953 $1,564 inc inc $0 $67 $11,583 Menifee Human Resources Manager $11,581 $11,581 $1,800 inc inc $17 $13,398 Murrieta Human Resources Manager $11,967 $217 $12,184 $1,563 $98 $40 $24 $81 $13,989 Palm Springs No Comparable Class
Redlands Asst Dir, Human Resources/Risk Mgmt $14,290 $286 $14,576 $2,706 $127 $19 $17,428 Rialto No Comparable Class
Riverside No Comparable Class
San Bernardino Human Resources Manager $10,234 $10,234 $1,250 inc inc $7 $18 $11,509 Temecula No Comparable Class
Upland Human Resources/Risk Manager $10,037 $452 $703 $11,191 $1,184 inc inc $12,375 Beaumont Administrative Services Manager $9,138 $9,138 $1,675 inc inc $7 $10,820 Average $11,525 $12,266 $14,068
% +/--26.1%-34.2%-30.0%
Median $11,041 $11,386 $12,886
8 % +/--20.8%-24.6%-19.1%
75th Percenile $12,427 $12,782 $14,849
8 % +/--36.0%-39.9%-37.2%
Median Gain/Loss -3.8%5.5%
7 Print Date: 1/26/2022 317
Item 18.

Ralph Andersen & Associates Data Effective June 2021
Beaumont
Administrative Services Manager
Survey Agency Comparable Class
Banning Human Resources/Risk Manager
Cathedral City Human Resources Manager
Colton No Comparable Class
Corona Human Resources Manager II
Menifee Human Resources Manager
Murrieta Human Resources Manager
Palm Springs No Comparable Class
Redlands Asst Dir, Human Resources/Risk Mgmt
Rialto No Comparable Class
Riverside No Comparable Class
San Bernardino Human Resources Manager
Temecula No Comparable Class
Upland Human Resources/Risk Manager
Beaumont Administrative Services Manager
Average
% +/-
Median
8 % +/-
75th Percenile
8 % +/-
Retirement Benefits Leave Benefits
Emp. Ret.EE Cont
to ER Ret. Form.

Base +
Cash +
Ins. + Ret.

Hol Sick Admin Vac
Max
Total
Leave
$3,234 2@60 $15,471 10 8 13 31
$1,271 ($1,243)2@60 $20,056 12 8 18 38
$5,541 2.7@55 $17,123 8 9 25 42
$1,813 2.7@55 $15,210 10 9 5 13 37
$1,212 2@60 $15,200 9 7 23 39
$3,725 2@55 $21,153 9 33 42
$4,430 ($236)2@55 $15,703 11 8 7 17 42
$4,633 ($141)2.5@55 $16,868 11 8 4 15 38
$2,359 3@60 $13,179 9 8 17 34
$17,098 38.5
-29.7%-13.1%
$16,285 38.4
-23.6%-12.8%
$17,856 41.7
-35.5%-22.5%
-4.5%
8 Print Date: 1/26/2022 318
Item 18.

Ralph Andersen & Associates Data Effective June 2021
Beaumont
Animal Control Officer II 7 Cash Supplements Insurance Benefits Survey Agency Comparable Class Range
Max.Long.Uniform Educ.

Inc.

Def.

Comp.

Ret.

Pickup
Base +
Cash Health Dental Vision Life LTD
Base +
Cash +
Ins.

Banning No Comparable Class
Cathedral City No Comparable Class
Colton Animal Services Officer $3,996 $80 $200 $4,276 $1,100 inc inc $8 $18 $5,402 Corona Animal Control Officer II $4,472 $83 $70 $4,625 $1,564 inc inc $0 $30 $6,219 Menifee No Comparable Class
Murrieta No Comparable Class
Palm Springs Animal Control Officer $5,525 $85 $276 $5,886 $2,106 inc inc $11 $20 $8,024 Redlands Animal Control Officer $4,181 $142 $72 $4,394 $900 $127 $19 $5,440 Rialto Animal Control Officer II $4,838 $290 $133 $363 $600 $6,224 $1,300 inc inc $7,524 Riverside No Comparable Class
San Bernardino Animal Control Officer $4,170 $4,170 $880 inc inc $1 $7 $5,058 Temecula No Comparable Class
Upland Animal Services Officer $4,785 $215 $25 $100 $5,125 $1,267 inc inc $6,392 Beaumont Animal Control Officer II $6,155 $100 $616 $6,871 $1,675 inc inc $7 $8,553 Average $4,567 $4,957 $6,294
% +/-25.8%27.8%26.4%
Median $4,472 $4,625 $6,219
7 % +/-27.3%32.7%27.3%
75th Percenile $4,812 $5,506 $6,958
9 % +/-21.8%19.9%18.6%
Median Gain/Loss 5.3%-5.4%
9 Print Date: 1/26/2022 319
Item 18.

Ralph Andersen & Associates Data Effective June 2021
Beaumont
Animal Control Officer II
Survey Agency Comparable Class
Banning No Comparable Class
Cathedral City No Comparable Class
Colton Animal Services Officer
Corona Animal Control Officer II
Menifee No Comparable Class
Murrieta No Comparable Class
Palm Springs Animal Control Officer
Redlands Animal Control Officer
Rialto Animal Control Officer II
Riverside No Comparable Class
San Bernardino Animal Control Officer
Temecula No Comparable Class
Upland Animal Services Officer
Beaumont Animal Control Officer II
Average
% +/-
Median
7 % +/-
75th Percenile
9 % +/-
Retirement Benefits Leave Benefits
Emp. Ret.EE Cont
to ER Ret. Form.

Base +
Cash +
Ins. + Ret.

Hol Sick Admin Vac
Max
Total
Leave
$1,322 2.5@55 $6,724 11 8 13 32
$2,532 2.7@55 $8,751 8 21 29
$1,940 2@60 $9,963 10 21 31
$1,090 2@55 $6,530 9 8 17 34
$2,287 2.7@55 $9,811 11 10 23 44
$1,805 ($54)2@55 $6,809 11 8 17 35
$2,209 ($67)2.5@55 $8,534 11 8 15 34
$1,589 3@60 $10,141 9 8 17 34
$8,161 33.9

19.5%0.2%
$8,534 33.5

15.8%1.5%
$9,281 34.4

8.5%-1.2%
-11.4%
10 Print Date: 1/26/2022 320
Item 18.

Ralph Andersen & Associates Data Effective June 2021
Beaumont
Assistant City Manager 9 Cash Supplements Insurance Benefits Survey Agency Comparable Class Range
Max.Long.Uniform Educ.

Inc.

Def.

Comp.

Ret.

Pickup
Base +
Cash Health Dental Vision Life LTD
Base +
Cash +
Ins.

Banning No Comparable Class
Cathedral City Assistant City Manager $18,040 $2,706 $902 $100 $1,263 $23,011 $2,300 inc inc $78 $43 $25,432 Colton Assistant City Manager $15,846 $15,846 $1,183 inc inc $17 $71 $17,117 Corona No Comparable Class
Menifee Assistant City Manager $19,070 $19,070 $1,800 inc inc $17 $20,887 Murrieta Deputy City Manager $18,935 $250 $19,185 $1,563 $98 $40 $38 $129 $21,052 Palm Springs Assistant City Manager $19,332 $967 $20,299 $2,094 inc inc $11 $240 $22,643 Redlands No Comparable Class
Rialto Deputy City Manager $16,713 $1,253 $750 $18,716 $1,300 $137 $25 $20,179 Riverside Assistant City Manager $21,954 $75 $22,029 $1,482 $45 inc $126 $23,682 San Bernardino Assistant City Manager $18,159 $18,159 $1,250 inc inc $20 $32 $19,460 Temecula Assistant City Manager $18,158 $1,271 $19,429 $1,600 inc inc $21,029 Upland No Comparable Class
Beaumont Assistant City Manager $19,646 $19,646 $1,675 inc inc $7 $21,328 Average $18,467 $19,527 $21,276
% +/-6.0%0.6%0.2%
Median $18,159 $19,185 $21,029
9 % +/-7.6%2.3%1.4%
75th Percenile $19,070 $20,299 $22,643
10 % +/-2.9%-3.3%-6.2%
Median Gain/Loss -5.2%-0.9%
11 Print Date: 1/26/2022 321
Item 18.

Ralph Andersen & Associates Data Effective June 2021
Beaumont
Assistant City Manager
Survey Agency Comparable Class
Banning No Comparable Class
Cathedral City Assistant City Manager
Colton Assistant City Manager
Corona No Comparable Class
Menifee Assistant City Manager
Murrieta Deputy City Manager
Palm Springs Assistant City Manager
Redlands No Comparable Class
Rialto Deputy City Manager
Riverside Assistant City Manager
San Bernardino Assistant City Manager
Temecula Assistant City Manager
Upland No Comparable Class
Beaumont Assistant City Manager
Average
% +/-
Median
9 % +/-
75th Percenile
10 % +/-
Retirement Benefits Leave Benefits
Emp. Ret.EE Cont
to ER Ret. Form.

Base +
Cash +
Ins. + Ret.

Hol Sick Admin Vac
Max
Total
Leave
$1,660 ($1,624)2@60 $25,469 12 8 22 42
$5,244 2.5@55 $22,362 12 8 7 13 40
$2,985 2.7@55 $23,871 10 9 5 13 37
$1,917 2@60 $22,969 9 10 23 42
$6,787 2@60 $29,430 10 4 21 35
$7,901 2.7@55 $28,079 10 10 12 20 52
$6,975 2.7@55 $30,657 8 8 4 17 37
$7,861 ($418)2@55 $26,903 11 8 7 17 42
$6,254 ($545)2@60 $26,738 8 7 24 39
$5,071 3@60 $26,399 9 8 17 34
$26,275 40.4

0.5%-19.0%
$26,738 39.7
-1.3%-16.7%
$28,079 42.0
-6.4%-23.5%
-2.7%
12 Print Date: 1/26/2022 322
Item 18.

Ralph Andersen & Associates Data Effective June 2021
Beaumont
Assistant Director of Public Works/ Assistant City Engineer 7 Cash Supplements Insurance Benefits Survey Agency Comparable Class Range
Max.Long.Uniform Educ.

Inc.

Def.

Comp.

Ret.

Pickup
Base +
Cash Health Dental Vision Life LTD
Base +
Cash +
Ins.

Banning No Comparable Class
Cathedral City No Comparable Class
Colton Asst Public Works & Utility Srvcs Director $14,100 $14,100 $1,183 inc inc $17 $63 $15,363 Corona Assistant Public Works Director/City Eng $15,103 $167 $15,270 $1,564 inc inc $0 $103 $16,936 Menifee Assistant City Engineer $12,924 $12,924 $1,800 inc inc $17 $14,741 Murrieta No Comparable Class
Palm Springs No Comparable Class
Redlands Engineering Manager $12,630 $253 $12,883 $900 $127 $19 $13,929 Rialto No Comparable Class
Riverside Deputy Public Works Director/City Engineer $17,079 $75 $17,154 $1,482 $45 inc $98 $18,779 San Bernardino Deputy Dir of Public Works/City Engineer $12,937 $12,937 $1,250 inc inc $7 $23 $14,216 Temecula No Comparable Class
Upland Engineering Manager $11,356 $511 $795 $12,662 $1,184 inc inc $13,846 Beaumont Assistant Director of Public Works/ Assistant City Engineer$12,289 $12,289 $1,675 inc inc $7 $13,971 Average $13,733 $13,990 $15,401
% +/--11.7%-13.8%-10.2%
Median $12,937 $12,937 $14,741
7 % +/--5.3%-5.3%-5.5%
75th Percenile $14,601 $14,685 $16,150
9 % +/--18.8%-19.5%-15.6%
Median Gain/Loss 0.0%-0.2%
13 Print Date: 1/26/2022 323
Item 18.

Ralph Andersen & Associates Data Effective June 2021
Beaumont
Assistant Director of Public Works/ Assistant City Engineer Survey Agency Comparable Class
Banning No Comparable Class
Cathedral City No Comparable Class
Colton Asst Public Works & Utility Srvcs Director
Corona Assistant Public Works Director/City Eng
Menifee Assistant City Engineer
Murrieta No Comparable Class
Palm Springs No Comparable Class
Redlands Engineering Manager
Rialto No Comparable Class
Riverside Deputy Public Works Director/City Engineer
San Bernardino Deputy Dir of Public Works/City Engineer Temecula No Comparable Class
Upland Engineering Manager
Beaumont Assistant Director of Public Works/ Assistant City Engineer Average
% +/-
Median
7 % +/-
75th Percenile
9 % +/-
Retirement Benefits Leave Benefits
Emp. Ret.EE Cont
to ER Ret. Form.

Base +
Cash +
Ins. + Ret.

Hol Sick Admin Vac
Max
Total
Leave
$4,666 2.5@55 $20,029 12 8 7 13 40
$8,551 2.7@55 $25,487 8 25 33
$2,023 2.7@55 $16,764 10 9 5 13 37
$3,292 2@55 $17,221 9 8 10 17 44
$5,426 2.7@55 $24,205 8 8 3 15 34
$5,601 ($298)2@55 $19,519 11 8 7 17 42
$5,242 ($159)2.5@55 $18,929 11 8 4 15 38
$3,172 3@60 $17,143 9 8 17 34
$20,308 38.0
-18.5%-11.9%
$19,519 37.7
-13.9%-10.8%
$22,117 40.8
-29.0%-19.9%
-8.3%
14 Print Date: 1/26/2022 324
Item 18.

Ralph Andersen & Associates Data Effective June 2021
Beaumont
Associate Planner - Drift Check 13 Cash Supplements Insurance Benefits Survey Agency Comparable Class Range
Max.Long.Uniform Educ.

Inc.

Def.

Comp.

Ret.

Pickup
Base +
Cash Health Dental Vision Life LTD
Base +
Cash +
Ins.

Banning Associate Planner $7,251 $275 $7,526 $1,400 inc $21 $39 $8,986 Cathedral City Associate Planner $9,812 $1,472 $491 $100 $687 $12,561 $2,300 inc inc $42 $24 $14,927 Colton Associate Planner $6,556 $6,556 $1,100 inc inc $8 $30 $7,694 Corona Associate Planner $7,183 $83 $7,266 $1,564 inc inc $0 $49 $8,879 Menifee Associate Planner $7,927 $7,927 $1,800 inc inc $13 $9,740 Murrieta Associate Planner $7,586 $150 $7,736 $1,563 $98 $40 $15 $52 $9,503 Palm Springs Associate Planner $8,291 $415 $8,706 $2,094 inc inc $11 $103 $10,913 Redlands Associate Planner $7,245 $362 $7,607 $900 $127 $19 $8,653 Rialto Associate Planner $7,240 $434 $507 $400 $8,581 $1,300 inc inc $9,881 Riverside Associate Planner $7,299 $7,299 $1,411 $45 inc $3 $8,758 San Bernardino Associate Planner $6,867 $6,867 $1,030 inc inc $1 $12 $7,910 Temecula Associate Planner II $8,240 $330 $8,570 $1,600 inc inc $10,170 Upland Associate Planner $6,761 $304 $473 $7,539 $1,184 inc inc $8,723 Beaumont Associate Planner - Drift
Average $7,558 $8,057 $9,595
% +/-
Median $7,251 $7,607 $8,986
13 % +/-
75th Percenile $7,927 $8,570 $9,881
12 % +/-
Median Gain/Loss
15 Print Date: 1/26/2022 325
Item 18.

Ralph Andersen & Associates Data Effective June 2021
Beaumont
Associate Planner - Drift Check
Survey Agency Comparable Class
Banning Associate Planner
Cathedral City Associate Planner
Colton Associate Planner
Corona Associate Planner
Menifee Associate Planner
Murrieta Associate Planner
Palm Springs Associate Planner
Redlands Associate Planner
Rialto Associate Planner
Riverside Associate Planner
San Bernardino Associate Planner
Temecula Associate Planner II
Upland Associate Planner
Beaumont Associate Planner - Drift
Average
% +/-
Median
13 % +/-
75th Percenile
12 % +/-
Retirement Benefits Leave Benefits
Emp. Ret.EE Cont
to ER Ret. Form.

Base +
Cash +
Ins. + Ret.

Hol Sick Admin Vac
Max
Total
Leave
$2,233 2@60 $11,219 11 8 13 32
$903 ($883)2@60 $14,947 12 8 18 38
$2,170 2.5@55 $9,863 11 8 7 13 39
$4,067 2.7@55 $12,946 8 21 29
$1,241 2.7@55 $10,981 10 9 13 32
$768 2@60 $10,271 9 5 23 37
$2,911 2@60 $13,824 10 21 31
$1,888 2@55 $10,542 11 8 17 35
$3,422 2.7@55 $13,304 12 10 10 23 54
$2,319 2.7@55 $11,076 8 8 13 29
$2,973 ($158)2@55 $10,724 11 8 3 17 39
$2,838 2@60 $13,008 8 23 31
$3,121 ($95)2.5@55 $11,749 11 8 4 15 38
$11,881 35.6
$11,219 35.3
$13,008 38.0
16 Print Date: 1/26/2022 326
Item 18.

Ralph Andersen & Associates Data Effective June 2021
Beaumont
Building Inspector 12 Cash Supplements Insurance Benefits Survey Agency Comparable Class Range
Max.Long.Uniform Educ.

Inc.

Def.

Comp.

Ret.

Pickup
Base +
Cash Health Dental Vision Life LTD
Base +
Cash +
Ins.

Banning No Comparable Class
Cathedral City Building Inspector II $7,207 $360 $100 $7,667 $2,441 inc inc $17 $10,125 Colton Building Inspector II $5,469 $109 $273 $5,852 $1,100 inc inc $8 $25 $6,985 Corona Building Inspector II $5,194 $83 $5,277 $1,564 inc inc $0 $35 $6,876 Menifee Building Inspector $6,860 $6,860 $1,800 inc inc $13 $8,672 Murrieta Building Inspector II $6,266 $100 $6,366 $1,563 $98 $40 $8 $43 $8,117 Palm Springs Building Inspector $6,903 $30 $345 $7,278 $2,106 inc inc $11 $26 $9,421 Redlands Building Inspector II $6,558 $328 $6,886 $900 $127 $19 $7,932 Rialto Building Inspector $5,942 $357 $446 $600 $7,344 $1,300 inc inc $8,644 Riverside Building Inspector II $7,260 $7,260 $1,411 $45 inc $3 $8,719 San Bernardino Building Inspector II $5,912 $5,912 $880 inc inc $1 $10 $6,803 Temecula Building Inspector II $7,651 $10 $306 $7,967 $1,600 inc inc $9,567 Upland Building Inspector II $5,976 $269 $17 $100 $6,362 $1,267 inc inc $7,629 Beaumont Building Inspector $6,795 $100 $679 $7,574 $1,675 inc inc $7 $9,256 Average $6,433 $6,753 $8,291
% +/-5.3%10.8%10.4%
Median $6,412 $6,873 $8,381
12 % +/-5.6%9.3%9.5%
75th Percenile $6,979 $7,295 $8,894
13 % +/--2.7%3.7%3.9%
Median Gain/Loss 3.6%0.2%
17 Print Date: 1/26/2022 327
Item 18.

Ralph Andersen & Associates Data Effective June 2021
Beaumont
Building Inspector
Survey Agency Comparable Class
Banning No Comparable Class
Cathedral City Building Inspector II
Colton Building Inspector II
Corona Building Inspector II
Menifee Building Inspector
Murrieta Building Inspector II
Palm Springs Building Inspector
Redlands Building Inspector II
Rialto Building Inspector
Riverside Building Inspector II
San Bernardino Building Inspector II
Temecula Building Inspector II
Upland Building Inspector II
Beaumont Building Inspector
Average
% +/-
Median
12 % +/-
75th Percenile
13 % +/-
Retirement Benefits Leave Benefits
Emp. Ret.EE Cont
to ER Ret. Form.

Base +
Cash +
Ins. + Ret.

Hol Sick Admin Vac
Max
Total
Leave
$663 2@60 $10,789 12 8 18 38
$1,810 2.5@55 $8,795 11 8 13 32
$2,941 2.7@55 $9,817 8 21 29
$1,074 2.7@55 $9,746 10 9 13 32
$634 2@60 $8,751 9 23 32
$2,423 2@60 $11,844 10 21 31
$1,709 2@55 $9,641 11 8 17 35
$2,809 2.7@55 $11,453 12 10 23 44
$2,307 2.7@55 $11,025 8 8 13 29
$2,559 ($77)2@55 $9,286 11 8 17 35
$2,635 2@60 $12,203 8 23 31
$2,758 ($84)2.5@55 $10,303 11 8 15 34
$1,754 3@60 $11,010 9 8 17 34
$10,304 33.5

6.4%1.5%
$10,060 32.2

8.6%5.3%
$11,132 35.2
-1.1%-3.6%
-0.8%
18 Print Date: 1/26/2022 328
Item 18.

Ralph Andersen & Associates Data Effective June 2021
Beaumont
Building Permit Technician II 13 Cash Supplements Insurance Benefits Survey Agency Comparable Class Range
Max.Long.Uniform Educ.

Inc.

Def.

Comp.

Ret.

Pickup
Base +
Cash Health Dental Vision Life LTD
Base +
Cash +
Ins.

Banning Building Permit Specialist $5,158 $5,158 $1,400 inc $21 inc $6,579 Cathedral City Permit Technician II $6,076 $304 $100 $6,480 $2,441 inc inc $15 $8,935 Colton Planning/Building Technician $4,567 $91 $228 $4,887 $1,100 inc inc $8 $21 $6,015 Corona Senior Building Permit Technician $4,701 $83 $4,784 $1,564 inc inc $0 $32 $6,380 Menifee Building Permit Technician $6,055 $6,055 $1,800 inc inc $13 $7,868 Murrieta Development Services Technician $5,597 $100 $5,697 $1,563 $98 $40 $8 $38 $7,443 Palm Springs Permit Center Technician $6,570 $329 $6,899 $2,106 inc inc $11 $24 $9,040 Redlands Permit Technician II $5,763 $288 $6,051 $900 $127 $19 $7,097 Rialto Permit Technician $4,877 $293 $366 $600 $6,135 $1,300 inc inc $7,435 Riverside Building Permit Technician $5,030 $5,030 $1,411 $45 inc $3 $6,489 San Bernardino Community Development Technician $4,607 $4,607 $880 inc inc $1 $8 $5,496 Temecula Community Development Technician II $5,978 $239 $6,217 $1,600 inc inc $7,817 Upland Development Services Technician $4,555 $205 $100 $4,860 $1,267 inc inc $6,127 Beaumont Building Permit Technician II $5,859 $586 $6,445 $1,675 inc inc $7 $8,127 Average $5,349 $5,605 $7,132
% +/-8.7%13.0%12.2%
Median $5,158 $5,697 $7,097
13 % +/-12.0%11.6%12.7%
75th Percenile $5,978 $6,135 $7,817
13 % +/--2.0%4.8%3.8%
Median Gain/Loss -0.4%1.1%
19 Print Date: 1/26/2022 329
Item 18.

Ralph Andersen & Associates Data Effective June 2021
Beaumont
Building Permit Technician II
Survey Agency Comparable Class
Banning Building Permit Specialist
Cathedral City Permit Technician II
Colton Planning/Building Technician
Corona Senior Building Permit Technician
Menifee Building Permit Technician
Murrieta Development Services Technician
Palm Springs Permit Center Technician
Redlands Permit Technician II
Rialto Permit Technician
Riverside Building Permit Technician
San Bernardino Community Development Technician
Temecula Community Development Technician II
Upland Development Services Technician
Beaumont Building Permit Technician II
Average
% +/-
Median
13 % +/-
75th Percenile
13 % +/-
Retirement Benefits Leave Benefits
Emp. Ret.EE Cont
to ER Ret. Form.

Base +
Cash +
Ins. + Ret.

Hol Sick Admin Vac
Max
Total
Leave
$1,589 2@60 $8,167 11 8 13 32
$559 2@60 $9,494 12 8 18 38
$1,511 2.5@55 $7,527 11 8 13 32
$2,662 2.7@55 $9,042 8 21 29
$948 2.7@55 $8,816 10 9 13 32
$567 2@60 $8,010 9 23 32
$2,307 2@60 $11,346 10 21 31
$1,502 2@55 $8,599 11 8 17 35
$2,305 2.7@55 $9,741 12 10 23 44
$1,598 2.7@55 $8,087 8 8 13 29
$1,994 ($60)2@55 $7,430 11 8 17 35
$2,059 2@60 $9,876 8 23 31
$2,103 ($64)2.5@55 $8,166 11 8 15 34
$1,512 3@60 $9,639 9 8 17 34
$8,792 33.4

8.8%1.8%
$8,599 32.2

10.8%5.4%
$9,494 35.2

1.5%-3.4%
-1.9%
20 Print Date: 1/26/2022 330
Item 18.

Ralph Andersen & Associates Data Effective June 2021
Beaumont
Building Plans Examiner 11 Cash Supplements Insurance Benefits Survey Agency Comparable Class Range
Max.Long.Uniform Educ.

Inc.

Def.

Comp.

Ret.

Pickup
Base +
Cash Health Dental Vision Life LTD
Base +
Cash +
Ins.

Banning No Comparable Class
Cathedral City No Comparable Class
Colton Plans Examiner $6,016 $120 $301 $6,437 $1,100 inc inc $8 $27 $7,573 Corona Plan Checker $5,542 $83 $5,625 $1,564 inc inc $0 $38 $7,227 Menifee Plans Examiner $7,693 $7,693 $1,800 inc inc $13 $9,506 Murrieta Plans Examiner $7,432 $100 $7,532 $1,563 $98 $40 $8 $51 $9,291 Palm Springs Plans Examiner $7,252 $363 $7,615 $2,106 inc inc $11 $27 $9,758 Redlands Plans Examiner $7,245 $362 $7,607 $900 $127 $19 $8,653 Rialto Plans Examiner $5,942 $357 $446 $600 $7,344 $1,300 inc inc $8,644 Riverside Plans Examiner $8,086 $8,086 $1,411 $45 inc $3 $9,545 San Bernardino Plans Examiner II $6,867 $6,867 $880 inc inc $1 $12 $7,760 Temecula Plan Checker $9,322 $373 $9,695 $1,600 inc inc $11,295 Upland Plans Examiner $6,930 $312 $17 $100 $7,359 $1,267 inc inc $8,626 Beaumont Building Plans Examiner $7,138 $714 $7,852 $1,675 inc inc $7 $9,534 Average $7,121 $7,442 $8,898
% +/-0.2%5.2%6.7%
Median $7,245 $7,532 $8,653
11 % +/--1.5%4.1%9.2%
75th Percenile $7,563 $7,654 $9,525
13 % +/--5.9%2.5%0.1%
Median Gain/Loss 5.6%5.2%
21 Print Date: 1/26/2022 331
Item 18.

Ralph Andersen & Associates Data Effective June 2021
Beaumont
Building Plans Examiner
Survey Agency Comparable Class
Banning No Comparable Class
Cathedral City No Comparable Class
Colton Plans Examiner
Corona Plan Checker
Menifee Plans Examiner
Murrieta Plans Examiner
Palm Springs Plans Examiner
Redlands Plans Examiner
Rialto Plans Examiner
Riverside Plans Examiner
San Bernardino Plans Examiner II
Temecula Plan Checker
Upland Plans Examiner
Beaumont Building Plans Examiner
Average
% +/-
Median
11 % +/-
75th Percenile
13 % +/-
Retirement Benefits Leave Benefits
Emp. Ret.EE Cont
to ER Ret. Form.

Base +
Cash +
Ins. + Ret.

Hol Sick Admin Vac
Max
Total
Leave
$1,991 2.5@55 $9,564 11 8 13 32
$3,138 2.7@55 $10,364 8 21 29
$1,204 2.7@55 $10,710 10 9 13 32
$752 2@60 $10,043 9 23 32
$2,546 2@60 $12,304 10 21 31
$1,888 2@55 $10,542 11 8 17 35
$2,809 2.7@55 $11,453 12 10 23 44
$2,569 2.7@55 $12,113 8 8 13 29
$2,973 ($90)2@55 $10,643 11 8 17 35
$3,211 2@60 $14,506 8 23 31
$3,199 ($97)2.5@55 $11,727 11 8 15 34
$1,842 3@60 $11,376 9 8 17 34
$11,270 33.1

0.9%2.7%
$10,710 32.0

5.9%5.8%
$11,920 34.3
-4.8%-1.0%
-3.4%
22 Print Date: 1/26/2022 332
Item 18.

Ralph Andersen & Associates Data Effective June 2021
Beaumont
Building/Grounds/Maintenance Supervisor 12 Cash Supplements Insurance Benefits Survey Agency Comparable Class Range
Max.Long.Uniform Educ.

Inc.

Def.

Comp.

Ret.

Pickup
Base +
Cash Health Dental Vision Life LTD
Base +
Cash +
Ins.

Banning Public Works Superintendent $9,282 $275 $9,557 $1,400 inc $21 $39 $11,016 Cathedral City Public Works Supervisor $8,476 $1,271 $424 $100 $593 $10,865 $2,300 inc inc $37 $20 $13,221 Colton Building Maintenance Supervisor $7,173 $7,173 $1,100 inc inc $8 $32 $8,313 Corona Parks Superintendent $8,260 $167 $8,427 $1,564 inc inc $0 $56 $10,047 Menifee Public Works Maintenance Supervisor $7,927 $7,927 $1,800 inc inc $13 $9,740 Murrieta Maintenance Supervisor $7,218 $150 $7,368 $1,563 $98 $40 $14 $49 $9,132 Palm Springs Maintenance Supervisor $8,084 $404 $8,488 $2,094 inc inc $11 $100 $10,693 Redlands Field Services Coordinator $6,776 $339 $7,115 $900 $127 $19 $8,161 Rialto No Comparable Class
Riverside Park Supervisor $6,917 $7 $75 $6,999 $1,482 $45 inc $40 $8,566 San Bernardino Parks & Landscape Maintenance Supervisor $7,111 $7,111 $1,030 inc inc $1 $12 $8,154 Temecula Maintenance Supervisor - Landscape $9,795 $10 $686 $10,491 $1,600 inc inc $12,091 Upland Maintenance Supervisor $6,596 $297 $462 $7,355 $1,184 inc inc $8,539 Beaumont Bldg/Grounds/Maintenance Supervisor $7,687 $7,687 $1,675 inc inc $7 $9,369 Average $7,801 $8,240 $9,806
% +/--1.5%-7.2%-4.7%
Median $7,573 $7,648 $9,436
12 % +/-1.5%0.5%-0.7%
75th Percenile $8,314 $8,755 $10,774
12 % +/--8.2%-13.9%-15.0%
Median Gain/Loss -1.0%-1.2%
23 Print Date: 1/26/2022 333
Item 18.

Ralph Andersen & Associates Data Effective June 2021
Beaumont
Building/Grounds/Maintenance Supervisor
Survey Agency Comparable Class
Banning Public Works Superintendent
Cathedral City Public Works Supervisor
Colton Building Maintenance Supervisor
Corona Parks Superintendent
Menifee Public Works Maintenance Supervisor
Murrieta Maintenance Supervisor
Palm Springs Maintenance Supervisor
Redlands Field Services Coordinator
Rialto No Comparable Class
Riverside Park Supervisor
San Bernardino Parks & Landscape Maintenance Supervisor Temecula Maintenance Supervisor - Landscape
Upland Maintenance Supervisor
Beaumont Bldg/Grounds/Maintenance Supervisor
Average
% +/-
Median
12 % +/-
75th Percenile
12 % +/-
Retirement Benefits Leave Benefits
Emp. Ret.EE Cont
to ER Ret. Form.

Base +
Cash +
Ins. + Ret.

Hol Sick Admin Vac
Max
Total
Leave
$2,859 2@60 $13,875 11 8 13 32
$780 ($763)2@60 $13,239 12 8 18 38
$2,374 2.5@55 $10,687 11 8 13 32
$4,677 2.7@55 $14,723 8 9 23 40
$1,241 2.7@55 $10,981 10 9 4 13 36
$731 2@60 $9,862 9 5 23 37
$2,838 2@60 $13,531 10 4 21 35
$1,766 2@55 $9,927 11 8 17 35
$2,198 2.7@55 $10,764 8 8 14 30
$3,078 ($164)2@55 $11,069 11 8 17 35
$3,374 ($294)2@60 $15,171 8 5 24 37
$3,045 ($92)2.5@55 $11,491 11 8 4 15 38
$1,984 3@60 $11,354 9 8 17 34
$12,110 35.5
-6.7%-4.4%
$11,280 35.6

0.6%-4.8%
$13,617 37.2
-19.9%-9.5%

1.4%
24 Print Date: 1/26/2022 334
Item 18.

Ralph Andersen & Associates Data Effective June 2021
Beaumont
Building/Grounds/Maintenance Worker 13 Cash Supplements Insurance Benefits Survey Agency Comparable Class Range
Max.Long.Uniform Educ.

Inc.

Def.

Comp.

Ret.

Pickup
Base +
Cash Health Dental Vision Life LTD
Base +
Cash +
Ins.

Banning Maintenance Worker $4,029 $4,029 $1,400 inc $21 inc $5,450 Cathedral City Facilities Maintenance Worker II $5,383 $269 $100 $5,752 $2,441 inc inc $13 $8,206 Colton Maintenance Worker II $4,000 $80 $200 $4,280 $1,100 inc inc $8 $18 $5,407 Corona Park Services Worker III $5,194 $83 $5,277 $1,564 inc inc $0 $35 $6,876 Menifee Facility Maintenance Worker $5,086 $5,086 $1,800 inc inc $13 $6,898 Murrieta Maintenance Worker II $4,537 $100 $4,637 $1,563 $98 $40 $8 $31 $6,376 Palm Springs Maintenance Mechanic I $5,394 $270 $5,664 $2,106 inc inc $11 $20 $7,801 Redlands Grounds Maintenance Worker II $3,988 $199 $4,187 $900 $127 $19 $5,234 Rialto Facility Maintenance Technician $4,877 $293 $366 $600 $6,135 $1,300 inc inc $7,435 Riverside Park Maintenance Worker II $4,821 $7 $4,828 $1,411 $45 inc $3 $6,287 San Bernardino Parks Maintenance Worker II $3,967 $3,967 $880 inc inc $1 $7 $4,855 Temecula Maintenance Worker II - Facilities $5,689 $228 $5,917 $1,600 inc inc $7,517 Upland Maintenance Worker $4,335 $195 $100 $4,630 $1,267 inc inc $5,897 Beaumont Bldg/Grounds/Maintenance Worker $4,808 $481 $5,289 $1,675 inc inc $7 $6,971 Average $4,715 $4,953 $6,480
% +/-1.9%6.4%7.0%
Median $4,821 $4,828 $6,376
13 % +/--0.3%8.7%8.5%
75th Percenile $5,194 $5,664 $7,435
13 % +/--8.0%-7.1%-6.7%
Median Gain/Loss 9.0%-0.2%
25 Print Date: 1/26/2022 335
Item 18.

Ralph Andersen & Associates Data Effective June 2021
Beaumont
Building/Grounds/Maintenance Worker
Survey Agency Comparable Class
Banning Maintenance Worker
Cathedral City Facilities Maintenance Worker II
Colton Maintenance Worker II
Corona Park Services Worker III
Menifee Facility Maintenance Worker
Murrieta Maintenance Worker II
Palm Springs Maintenance Mechanic I
Redlands Grounds Maintenance Worker II
Rialto Facility Maintenance Technician
Riverside Park Maintenance Worker II
San Bernardino Parks Maintenance Worker II
Temecula Maintenance Worker II - Facilities
Upland Maintenance Worker
Beaumont Bldg/Grounds/Maintenance Worker
Average
% +/-
Median
13 % +/-
75th Percenile
13 % +/-
Retirement Benefits Leave Benefits
Emp. Ret.EE Cont
to ER Ret. Form.

Base +
Cash +
Ins. + Ret.

Hol Sick Admin Vac
Max
Total
Leave
$1,241 2@60 $6,691 11 8 13 32
$495 2@60 $8,701 12 8 18 38
$1,324 2.5@55 $6,730 11 8 13 32
$2,941 2.7@55 $9,817 8 21 29
$796 2.7@55 $7,694 10 9 13 32
$459 2@60 $6,836 9 23 32
$1,894 2@60 $9,694 10 21 31
$1,039 2@55 $6,273 11 8 17 35
$2,305 2.7@55 $9,741 12 10 23 44
$1,532 2.7@55 $7,818 8 8 13 29
$1,717 ($52)2@55 $6,520 11 8 17 35
$1,959 2@60 $9,476 8 23 31
$2,001 ($61)2.5@55 $7,837 11 8 15 34
$1,241 3@60 $8,212 9 8 17 34
$7,987 33.4

2.7%1.8%
$7,818 32.2

4.8%5.4%
$9,476 35.2
-15.4%-3.4%
-3.7%
26 Print Date: 1/26/2022 336
Item 18.

Ralph Andersen & Associates Data Effective June 2021
Beaumont
Chief Building Official 11 Cash Supplements Insurance Benefits Survey Agency Comparable Class Range
Max.Long.Uniform Educ.

Inc.

Def.

Comp.

Ret.

Pickup
Base +
Cash Health Dental Vision Life LTD
Base +
Cash +
Ins.

Banning No Comparable Class
Cathedral City Building & Safety Manager $11,359 $1,704 $568 $100 $795 $14,526 $2,300 inc inc $49 $27 $16,902 Colton Building Official $10,361 $10,361 $1,100 inc inc $8 $47 $11,516 Corona Building Official/Building Inspection Manager $8,946 $167 $9,113 $1,564 inc inc $0 $61 $10,737 Menifee Building Official $12,924 $12,924 $1,800 inc inc $17 $14,741 Murrieta City Building Official $11,967 $150 $12,117 $1,563 $98 $40 $24 $81 $13,922 Palm Springs Building Official $11,537 $577 $12,114 $2,094 inc inc $11 $143 $14,362 Redlands Chief Building Official $11,442 $229 $11,671 $900 $127 $19 $12,717 Rialto Building & Safety Manager $10,230 $614 $716 $400 $11,960 $1,300 inc inc $13,260 Riverside Building Official $12,797 $75 $12,872 $1,482 $45 inc $74 $14,473 San Bernardino No Comparable Class
Temecula Building Official $13,501 $10 $945 $14,456 $1,600 inc inc $16,056 Upland Building Official $10,288 $463 $720 $11,471 $1,184 inc inc $12,655 Beaumont Building Official $14,251 $14,251 $1,675 inc inc $7 $15,933 Average $11,396 $12,144 $13,758
% +/-20.0%14.8%13.7%
Median $11,442 $12,114 $13,922
11 % +/-19.7%15.0%12.6%
75th Percenile $12,382 $12,898 $14,607
12 % +/-13.1%9.5%8.3%
Median Gain/Loss -4.7%-2.4%
27 Print Date: 1/26/2022 337
Item 18.

Ralph Andersen & Associates Data Effective June 2021
Beaumont
Chief Building Official
Survey Agency Comparable Class
Banning No Comparable Class
Cathedral City Building & Safety Manager
Colton Building Official
Corona Building Official/Building Inspection Manager
Menifee Building Official
Murrieta City Building Official
Palm Springs Building Official
Redlands Chief Building Official
Rialto Building & Safety Manager
Riverside Building Official
San Bernardino No Comparable Class
Temecula Building Official
Upland Building Official
Beaumont Building Official
Average
% +/-
Median
11 % +/-
75th Percenile
12 % +/-
Retirement Benefits Leave Benefits
Emp. Ret.EE Cont
to ER Ret. Form.

Base +
Cash +
Ins. + Ret.

Hol Sick Admin Vac
Max
Total
Leave
$1,045 ($1,022)2@60 $16,925 12 8 18 38
$3,429 2.5@55 $14,945 11 8 7 13 39
$5,065 2.7@55 $15,802 8 9 23 40
$2,023 2.7@55 $16,764 10 9 5 13 37
$1,212 2@60 $15,134 9 5 23 37
$4,050 2@60 $18,412 10 4 21 35
$2,982 2@55 $15,699 9 8 10 17 44
$4,836 2.7@55 $18,096 12 10 10 23 54
$4,066 2.7@55 $18,538 8 8 3 15 34
$4,650 ($405)2@60 $20,302 8 5 24 37
$4,749 ($144)2.5@55 $17,260 11 8 4 15 38
$3,679 3@60 $19,612 9 8 17 34
$17,080 39.3

12.9%-15.7%
$16,925 37.7

13.7%-10.8%
$18,254 39.7

6.9%-16.7%

1.1%
28 Print Date: 1/26/2022 338
Item 18.

Ralph Andersen & Associates Data Effective June 2021
Beaumont
Chief Plant Operator – Wastewater 4 Cash Supplements Insurance Benefits Survey Agency Comparable Class Range
Max.Long.Uniform Educ.

Inc.

Def.

Comp.

Ret.

Pickup
Base +
Cash Health Dental Vision Life LTD
Base +
Cash +
Ins.

Banning No Comparable Class
Cathedral City No Comparable Class
Colton Wastewater Utilities Supervisor $7,850 $7,850 $1,100 inc inc $8 $35 $8,993 Corona Deputy Chief Op - Water Reclamation $9,545 $167 $9,712 $1,564 inc inc $0 $65 $11,340 Menifee No Comparable Class
Murrieta No Comparable Class
Palm Springs No Comparable Class
Redlands Wastewater Operations Supervisor $8,580 $429 $9,009 $900 $127 $19 $10,055 Rialto No Comparable Class
Riverside Wastewater Plant Supervisor $10,113 $13 $75 $10,201 $1,482 $45 inc $58 $11,786 San Bernardino No Comparable Class
Temecula No Comparable Class
Upland No Comparable Class
Beaumont Chief Plant Operator – Wastewater $12,596 $12,596 $1,675 inc inc $7 $14,278 Average $9,022 $9,193 $10,544
% +/-28.4%27.0%26.2%
Median $9,063 $9,360 $10,698
4 % +/-28.1%25.7%25.1%
75th Percenile $9,687 $9,834 $11,452
6 % +/-23.1%21.9%19.8%
Median Gain/Loss -2.4%-0.6%
29 Print Date: 1/26/2022 339
Item 18.

Ralph Andersen & Associates Data Effective June 2021
Beaumont
Chief Plant Operator – Wastewater
Survey Agency Comparable Class
Banning No Comparable Class
Cathedral City No Comparable Class
Colton Wastewater Utilities Supervisor
Corona Deputy Chief Op - Water Reclamation
Menifee No Comparable Class
Murrieta No Comparable Class
Palm Springs No Comparable Class
Redlands Wastewater Operations Supervisor
Rialto No Comparable Class
Riverside Wastewater Plant Supervisor
San Bernardino No Comparable Class
Temecula No Comparable Class
Upland No Comparable Class
Beaumont Chief Plant Operator – Wastewater
Average
% +/-
Median
4 % +/-
75th Percenile
6 % +/-
Retirement Benefits Leave Benefits
Emp. Ret.EE Cont
to ER Ret. Form.

Base +
Cash +
Ins. + Ret.

Hol Sick Admin Vac
Max
Total
Leave
$2,598 2.5@55 $11,591 11 8 7 13 39
$5,404 2.7@55 $16,744 8 9 23 40
$2,236 2@55 $12,291 11 8 17 35
$3,213 2.7@55 $14,999 8 8 14 30
$3,251 3@60 $17,529 9 8 17 34
$13,906 36.2

20.7%-6.4%
$13,645 37.2

22.2%-9.3%
$15,435 39.3

11.9%-15.7%
-2.9%
30 Print Date: 1/26/2022 340
Item 18.

Ralph Andersen & Associates Data Effective June 2021
Beaumont
City Engineer / Public Works Director 13 Cash Supplements Insurance Benefits Survey Agency Comparable Class Range
Max.Long.Uniform Educ.

Inc.

Def.

Comp.

Ret.

Pickup
Base +
Cash Health Dental Vision Life LTD
Base +
Cash +
Ins.

Banning Public Works Director/City Engineer $15,183 $275 $15,458 $1,667 inc $21 $39 $17,184 Cathedral City Director of Engineering/Public Works $16,782 $2,517 $839 $100 $1,175 $21,413 $2,300 inc inc $72 $40 $23,826 Colton Public Works & Utility Services Director $15,091 $15,091 $1,183 inc inc $17 $68 $16,359 Corona Public Works Director $16,114 $167 $16,281 $1,564 inc inc $0 $110 $17,954 Menifee Director of Public Works and Engineering $17,259 $17,259 $1,800 inc inc $17 $19,076 Murrieta Director of PW/City Engineer $18,034 $250 $18,284 $1,563 $98 $40 $36 $123 $20,143 Palm Springs City Engineer $14,993 $750 $15,743 $2,094 inc inc $11 $186 $18,034 Redlands Director of Municipal Util & PW Eng $18,637 $373 $19,010 $2,706 $127 $19 $21,862 Rialto Public Works Director $16,354 $1,227 $750 $18,331 $1,300 $137 $25 $19,793 Riverside Public Works Director $19,958 $75 $20,033 $1,482 $45 inc $115 $21,675 San Bernardino Director of Public Works $17,020 $17,020 $1,250 inc inc $18 $30 $18,318 Temecula Director of Public Works $17,283 $1,210 $18,493 $1,600 inc inc $20,093 Upland Public Works Director $14,822 $371 $1,334 $16,527 $1,184 inc inc $17,711 Beaumont City Engineer/Public Works Director $18,243 $18,243 $1,675 inc inc $7 $19,925 Average $16,733 $17,611 $19,387
% +/-8.3%3.5%2.7%
Median $16,782 $17,259 $19,076
13 % +/-8.0%5.4%4.3%
75th Percenile $17,283 $18,493 $20,143
13 % +/-5.3%-1.4%-1.1%
Median Gain/Loss -2.6%-1.1%
31 Print Date: 1/26/2022 341
Item 18.

Ralph Andersen & Associates Data Effective June 2021
Beaumont
City Engineer / Public Works Director
Survey Agency Comparable Class
Banning Public Works Director/City Engineer
Cathedral City Director of Engineering/Public Works
Colton Public Works & Utility Services Director
Corona Public Works Director
Menifee Director of Public Works and Engineering
Murrieta Director of PW/City Engineer
Palm Springs City Engineer
Redlands Director of Municipal Util & PW Eng
Rialto Public Works Director
Riverside Public Works Director
San Bernardino Director of Public Works
Temecula Director of Public Works
Upland Public Works Director
Beaumont City Engineer/Public Works Director
Average
% +/-
Median
13 % +/-
75th Percenile
13 % +/-
Retirement Benefits Leave Benefits
Emp. Ret.EE Cont
to ER Ret. Form.

Base +
Cash +
Ins. + Ret.

Hol Sick Admin Vac
Max
Total
Leave
$4,676 2@60 $21,861 11 8 8 13 40
$1,544 ($1,510)2@60 $23,860 12 8 18 38
$4,994 2.5@55 $21,354 12 8 7 13 40
$9,123 2.7@55 $27,077 8 9 25 42
$2,702 2.7@55 $21,778 10 9 5 13 37
$1,826 2@60 $21,968 9 10 23 42
$5,264 2@60 $23,297 10 4 21 35
$4,858 2@55 $26,720 9 33 42
$7,731 2.7@55 $27,524 10 10 12 20 52
$6,341 2.7@55 $28,016 8 8 4 17 37
$7,368 ($392)2@55 $25,294 11 8 7 17 42
$5,953 ($518)2@60 $25,527 8 7 24 39
$6,841 ($208)2.5@55 $24,344 11 8 7 15 40
$4,709 3@60 $24,634 9 8 3 17 37
$24,509 40.3

0.5%-8.0%
$24,344 40.2

1.2%-7.6%
$26,720 41.7
-8.5%-11.6%
-3.1%
32 Print Date: 1/26/2022 342
Item 18.

Ralph Andersen & Associates Data Effective June 2021
Beaumont
City Manager 13 Cash Supplements Insurance Benefits
Survey Agency Comparable Class Range
Max.Long.Uniform Educ.

Inc.

Def.

Comp.

Ret.

Pickup
Base +
Cash Health Dental Vision Life LTD
Base +
Cash +
Ins.

Banning City Manager $20,930 $275 $21,205 $1,667 inc $21 $39 $22,931 Cathedral City City Manager $16,362 $2,454 $818 $1,000 $1,145 $21,780 $2,300 inc inc $71 $39 $24,190 Colton City Manager $16,554 $16,554 $1,183 inc inc $17 $74 $17,829 Corona City Manager $20,782 $167 $20,949 $1,564 inc inc $0 $141 $22,654 Menifee City Manager $22,082 $1,546 $23,628 $1,800 inc inc $17 $25,445 Murrieta City Manager $21,385 $1,625 $23,010 $1,563 $98 $40 $85 $145 $24,941 Palm Springs City Manager $22,917 $625 $23,542 $2,094 inc inc $22 $284 $25,942 Redlands City Manager $26,862 $537 $27,399 $2,706 $127 $19 $30,252 Rialto City Manager $20,000 $1,500 $750 $22,250 $1,300 $137 $25 $23,712 Riverside City Manager $26,803 $75 $26,878 $1,482 $45 inc $154 $28,559 San Bernardino City Manager $23,750 $23,750 $1,250 inc inc $26 $42 $25,067 Temecula City Manager $21,093 $1,477 $22,570 $1,600 inc inc $24,170 Upland City Manager $23,239 $581 $2,092 $25,911 $1,184 inc inc $27,095 Beaumont City Manager $23,353 $1,800 $25,153 $1,675 inc inc $7 $26,835 City ManagerAvg Average $21,751 $23,033 $24,830
% +/-6.9%8.4%7.5%
Median $21,385 $23,010 $24,941
13 % +/-8.4%8.5%7.1%
75th Percenile $23,239 $23,750 $25,942
13 % +/-0.5%5.6%3.3%
Median Gain/Loss 0.1%-1.5%
33 Print Date: 1/26/2022 343
Item 18.

Ralph Andersen & Associates Data Effective June 2021
Beaumont
City Manager
Survey Agency Comparable Class
Banning City Manager
Cathedral City City Manager
Colton City Manager
Corona City Manager
Menifee City Manager
Murrieta City Manager
Palm Springs City Manager
Redlands City Manager
Rialto City Manager
Riverside City Manager
San Bernardino City Manager
Temecula City Manager
Upland City Manager
Beaumont City Manager
City ManagerAvg Average
% +/-
Median
13 % +/-
75th Percenile
13 % +/-
Retirement Benefits Leave Benefits
Emp. Ret.EE Cont
to ER Ret. Form.

Base +
Cash +
Ins. + Ret.

Hol Sick Admin Vac
Max
Total
Leave
$6,447 2@60 $29,378 10 8 8 13 40
$1,506 ($1,473)2@60 $24,223 12 8 22 42
$5,478 ($497)2.5@55 $22,810 12 8 7 13 40
$11,766 2.7@55 $34,420 8 9 25 42
$3,456 2.7@55 $28,901 10 9 7 13 38
$2,165 2@60 $27,106 9 10 23 42
$8,045 2@60 $33,987 10 23 33
$7,001 2@55 $37,253 9 33 42
$9,454 2.7@55 $33,167 10 10 12 13 45
$8,515 2.7@55 $37,075 7 8 7 17 39
$10,282 ($547)2@55 $34,802 11 8 7 17 42
$7,265 ($633)2@60 $30,802 8 7 24 39
$10,726 ($325)2.5@55 $37,497 11 8 7 15 40
$6,028 3@60 $32,863 9 8 3 17 37
$31,648 40.2

3.7%-7.7%
$33,167 40.2
-0.9%-7.6%
$34,802 41.8
-5.9%-12.1%
-8.0%
34 Print Date: 1/26/2022 344
Item 18.

Ralph Andersen & Associates Data Effective June 2021
Beaumont
Community Development Director 13 Cash Supplements Insurance Benefits Survey Agency Comparable Class Range
Max.Long.Uniform Educ.

Inc.

Def.

Comp.

Ret.

Pickup
Base +
Cash Health Dental Vision Life LTD
Base +
Cash +
Ins.

Banning Community Development Director $12,461 $275 $12,736 $1,667 inc $21 $39 $14,463 Cathedral City Director of Planning/Building $16,782 $2,517 $839 $100 $1,175 $21,413 $2,300 inc inc $72 $40 $23,826 Colton Development Services Director $14,100 $14,100 $1,183 inc inc $17 $63 $15,363 Corona Community Development Director $16,114 $167 $16,281 $1,564 inc inc $0 $110 $17,954 Menifee Community Development Director $17,259 $17,259 $1,800 inc inc $17 $19,076 Murrieta City Planner $12,746 $250 $12,996 $1,563 $98 $40 $25 $87 $14,808 Palm Springs Director of Development Services $15,751 $788 $16,539 $2,094 inc inc $11 $195 $18,839 Redlands Development Services Director $16,957 $339 $17,296 $2,706 $127 $19 $20,149 Rialto Community Development Director $17,181 $1,289 $750 $19,220 $1,300 $137 $25 $20,682 Riverside City Planner $12,797 $75 $12,872 $1,482 $45 inc $74 $14,473 San Bernardino Director of Community & Econ Development $17,020 $17,020 $1,250 inc inc $18 $30 $18,318 Temecula Director of Community Development $16,049 $1,123 $17,172 $1,600 inc inc $18,772 Upland Development Services Director $14,244 $356 $1,282 $15,882 $1,184 inc inc $17,066 Beaumont Community Development Director $14,974 $14,974 $1,675 inc inc $7 $16,656 Average $15,343 $16,214 $17,984
% +/--2.5%-8.3%-8.0%
Median $16,049 $16,539 $18,318
13 % +/--7.2%-10.4%-10.0%
75th Percenile $16,957 $17,259 $19,076
13 % +/--13.2%-15.3%-14.5%
Median Gain/Loss -3.3%0.5%
35 Print Date: 1/26/2022 345
Item 18.

Ralph Andersen & Associates Data Effective June 2021
Beaumont
Community Development Director
Survey Agency Comparable Class
Banning Community Development Director
Cathedral City Director of Planning/Building
Colton Development Services Director
Corona Community Development Director
Menifee Community Development Director
Murrieta City Planner
Palm Springs Director of Development Services
Redlands Development Services Director
Rialto Community Development Director
Riverside City Planner
San Bernardino Director of Community & Econ Development Temecula Director of Community Development
Upland Development Services Director
Beaumont Community Development Director
Average
% +/-
Median
13 % +/-
75th Percenile
13 % +/-
Retirement Benefits Leave Benefits
Emp. Ret.EE Cont
to ER Ret. Form.

Base +
Cash +
Ins. + Ret.

Hol Sick Admin Vac
Max
Total
Leave
$3,838 2@60 $18,301 11 8 8 13 40
$1,544 ($1,510)2@60 $23,860 12 8 18 38
$4,666 2.5@55 $20,029 12 8 7 13 40
$9,123 2.7@55 $27,077 8 9 25 42
$2,702 2.7@55 $21,778 10 9 5 13 37
$1,290 2@60 $16,099 9 10 23 42
$5,530 2@60 $24,369 10 4 21 35
$4,420 2@55 $24,568 9 33 42
$8,122 2.7@55 $28,804 10 10 12 20 52
$4,066 2.7@55 $18,538 8 8 4 17 37
$7,368 ($392)2@55 $25,294 11 8 7 17 42
$5,528 ($481)2@60 $23,819 8 7 24 39
$6,575 ($199)2.5@55 $23,441 11 8 7 15 40
$3,865 3@60 $20,521 9 8 3 17 37
$22,767 40.3
-10.9%-8.0%
$23,819 40.2
-16.1%-7.6%
$24,568 41.7
-19.7%-11.6%
-6.1%
36 Print Date: 1/26/2022 346
Item 18.

Ralph Andersen & Associates Data Effective June 2021
Beaumont
Community Enhancement Officer II 13 Cash Supplements Insurance Benefits Survey Agency Comparable Class Range
Max.Long.Uniform Educ.

Inc.

Def.

Comp.

Ret.

Pickup
Base +
Cash Health Dental Vision Life LTD
Base +
Cash +
Ins.

Banning Code Compliance Officer $5,554 $5,554 $1,400 inc $21 inc $6,975 Cathedral City Code Compliance Officer II $6,704 $335 $100 $100 $7,239 $2,441 inc inc $16 $9,696 Colton Code Enforcement Officer $5,118 $102 $256 $5,476 $1,100 inc inc $8 $23 $6,608 Corona Code Enforcement Officer II $5,194 $83 $5,277 $1,564 inc inc $0 $35 $6,876 Menifee Code Enforcement Officer II $6,493 $6,493 $1,800 inc inc $13 $8,306 Murrieta Code Enforcement Officer $6,572 $50 $100 $6,722 $1,563 $98 $40 $8 $45 $8,475 Palm Springs Code Compliance Officer $6,251 $30 $313 $6,594 $2,106 inc inc $11 $23 $8,734 Redlands Code Enforcement Officer $5,649 $282 $17 $5,948 $900 $127 $19 $6,994 Rialto Code Enforcement Officer $5,518 $331 $96 $414 $600 $6,959 $1,300 inc inc $8,259 Riverside Code Enforcement Officer II $6,783 $23 $6,806 $1,411 $45 inc $3 $8,265 San Bernardino Code Enforcement Officer II $5,625 $5,625 $880 inc inc $1 $10 $6,516 Temecula Code Enforcement Officer II $6,280 $10 $251 $6,542 $1,600 inc inc $8,142 Upland Code Enforcement Officer $5,549 $250 $25 $100 $5,924 $1,267 inc inc $7,191 Beaumont Community Enhancement Officer II $6,467 $100 $647 $7,214 $1,675 inc inc $7 $8,896 Average $5,945 $6,243 $7,772
% +/-8.1%13.5%12.6%
Median $5,649 $6,493 $8,142
13 % +/-12.6%10.0%8.5%
75th Percenile $6,493 $6,722 $8,306
13 % +/--0.4%6.8%6.6%
Median Gain/Loss -2.7%-1.5%
37 Print Date: 1/26/2022 347
Item 18.

Ralph Andersen & Associates Data Effective June 2021
Beaumont
Community Enhancement Officer II
Survey Agency Comparable Class
Banning Code Compliance Officer
Cathedral City Code Compliance Officer II
Colton Code Enforcement Officer
Corona Code Enforcement Officer II
Menifee Code Enforcement Officer II
Murrieta Code Enforcement Officer
Palm Springs Code Compliance Officer
Redlands Code Enforcement Officer
Rialto Code Enforcement Officer
Riverside Code Enforcement Officer II
San Bernardino Code Enforcement Officer II
Temecula Code Enforcement Officer II
Upland Code Enforcement Officer
Beaumont Community Enhancement Officer II
Average
% +/-
Median
13 % +/-
75th Percenile
13 % +/-
Retirement Benefits Leave Benefits
Emp. Ret.EE Cont
to ER Ret. Form.

Base +
Cash +
Ins. + Ret.

Hol Sick Admin Vac
Max
Total
Leave
$1,711 2@60 $8,686 11 8 13 32
$617 2@60 $10,313 12 8 18 38
$1,694 2.5@55 $8,302 11 8 13 32
$2,941 2.7@55 $9,817 8 21 29
$1,016 2.7@55 $9,323 10 9 13 32
$665 2@60 $9,140 9 23 32
$2,195 2@60 $10,928 10 21 31
$1,472 2@55 $8,467 11 8 17 35
$2,608 2.7@55 $10,867 12 10 215 237
$2,155 2.7@55 $10,420 8 8 13 29
$2,435 ($73)2@55 $8,878 11 8 17 35
$2,163 2@60 $10,305 8 23 31
$2,561 ($78)2.5@55 $9,674 11 8 15 34
$1,669 3@60 $10,565 9 8 17 34
$9,624 48.2

8.9%-41.8%
$9,674 32.2

8.4%5.4%
$10,313 35.2

2.4%-3.4%
-0.0%
38 Print Date: 1/26/2022 348
Item 18.

Ralph Andersen & Associates Data Effective June 2021
Beaumont
Community Services Coordinator - Drift Check 8 Cash Supplements Insurance Benefits Survey Agency Comparable Class Range
Max.Long.Uniform Educ.

Inc.

Def.

Comp.

Ret.

Pickup
Base +
Cash Health Dental Vision Life LTD
Base +
Cash +
Ins.

Banning Program Coordinator $4,448 $4,448 $1,400 inc $21 inc $5,868 Cathedral City No Comparable Class
Colton Recreation Services Coordinator $4,568 $91 $228 $4,888 $1,100 inc inc $8 $21 $6,017 Corona Recreation Coordinator $5,066 $83 $5,149 $1,564 inc inc $0 $34 $6,747 Menifee Community Services Coordinator $5,704 $5,704 $1,800 inc inc $13 $7,516 Murrieta Senior Recreation Coordinator $5,949 $100 $6,049 $1,563 $98 $40 $8 $40 $7,798 Palm Springs Program Coordinator $5,394 $270 $5,664 $2,106 inc inc $11 $20 $7,801 Redlands Program Specialist $5,114 $256 $5,370 $900 $127 $19 $6,416 Rialto No Comparable Class
Riverside No Comparable Class
San Bernardino Community Recreation Program Coordinator $3,416 $3,416 $880 inc inc $1 $6 $4,303 Temecula No Comparable Class
Upland No Comparable Class
Beaumont Community Services Coordinator - Drift
Average $4,957 $5,086 $6,558
% +/-
Median $5,090 $5,260 $6,582
8 % +/-
75th Percenile $5,471 $5,674 $7,587
8 % +/-
Median Gain/Loss
39 Print Date: 1/26/2022 349
Item 18.

Ralph Andersen & Associates Data Effective June 2021
Beaumont
Community Services Coordinator - Drift Check
Survey Agency Comparable Class
Banning Program Coordinator
Cathedral City No Comparable Class
Colton Recreation Services Coordinator
Corona Recreation Coordinator
Menifee Community Services Coordinator
Murrieta Senior Recreation Coordinator
Palm Springs Program Coordinator
Redlands Program Specialist
Rialto No Comparable Class
Riverside No Comparable Class
San Bernardino Community Recreation Program Coordinator Temecula No Comparable Class
Upland No Comparable Class
Beaumont Community Services Coordinator - Drift
Average
% +/-
Median
8 % +/-
75th Percenile
8 % +/-
Retirement Benefits Leave Benefits
Emp. Ret.EE Cont
to ER Ret. Form.

Base +
Cash +
Ins. + Ret.

Hol Sick Admin Vac
Max
Total
Leave
$1,370 2@60 $7,238 11 8 13 32
$1,512 2.5@55 $7,529 11 8 13 32
$2,868 2.7@55 $9,616 8 21 29
$893 2.7@55 $8,409 10 9 13 32
$602 2@60 $8,400 9 23 32
$1,894 2@60 $9,694 10 21 31
$1,333 2@55 $7,749 11 8 17 35
$1,479 ($45)2@55 $5,737 11 8 17 35
$8,047 32.3
$8,074 32.1
$8,711 33.0
40 Print Date: 1/26/2022 350
Item 18.

Ralph Andersen & Associates Data Effective June 2021
Beaumont
Community Services Director 9 Cash Supplements Insurance Benefits Survey Agency Comparable Class Range
Max.Long.Uniform Educ.

Inc.

Def.

Comp.

Ret.

Pickup
Base +
Cash Health Dental Vision Life LTD
Base +
Cash +
Ins.

Banning Parks and Recreation Director $12,461 $275 $12,736 $1,667 inc $21 $39 $14,463 Cathedral City No Comparable Class
Colton Community Services Director $14,100 $14,100 $1,183 inc inc $17 $63 $15,363 Corona No Comparable Class
Menifee Community Services Director $16,419 $16,419 $1,800 inc inc $17 $18,236 Murrieta Parks and Recreation Manager $11,038 $217 $11,255 $1,563 $98 $40 $22 $75 $13,052 Palm Springs Director of Parks and Recreation $13,921 $696 $14,617 $2,094 inc inc $11 $173 $16,895 Redlands No Comparable Class
Rialto Director of Community Services $14,454 $1,084 $750 $16,288 $1,300 $137 $25 $17,750 Riverside Parks/Recreation and Community Services Director$19,010 $75 $19,085 $1,482 $45 inc $109 $20,721 San Bernardino Director of Parks, Rec, & Community Services $14,509 $14,509 $1,250 inc inc $16 $25 $15,800 Temecula Director of Community Services $16,049 $1,123 $17,172 $1,600 inc inc $18,772 Upland No Comparable Class
Beaumont Community Services Director $14,251 $14,251 $1,675 inc inc $7 $15,933 Average $14,662 $15,131 $16,784
% +/--2.9%-6.2%-5.3%
Median $14,454 $14,617 $16,895
9 % +/--1.4%-2.6%-6.0%
75th Percenile $16,049 $16,419 $18,236
10 % +/--12.6%-15.2%-14.5%
Median Gain/Loss -1.1%-3.5%
41 Print Date: 1/26/2022 351
Item 18.

Ralph Andersen & Associates Data Effective June 2021
Beaumont
Community Services Director
Survey Agency Comparable Class
Banning Parks and Recreation Director
Cathedral City No Comparable Class
Colton Community Services Director
Corona No Comparable Class
Menifee Community Services Director
Murrieta Parks and Recreation Manager
Palm Springs Director of Parks and Recreation
Redlands No Comparable Class
Rialto Director of Community Services
Riverside Parks/Recreation and Community Services Director San Bernardino Director of Parks, Rec, & Community Services Temecula Director of Community Services
Upland No Comparable Class
Beaumont Community Services Director
Average
% +/-
Median
9 % +/-
75th Percenile
10 % +/-
Retirement Benefits Leave Benefits
Emp. Ret.EE Cont
to ER Ret. Form.

Base +
Cash +
Ins. + Ret.

Hol Sick Admin Vac
Max
Total
Leave
$3,838 2@60 $18,301 11 8 8 13 40
$4,666 2.5@55 $20,029 12 8 7 13 40
$2,570 2.7@55 $20,806 10 9 5 13 37
$1,117 2@60 $14,169 9 7 23 39
$4,887 2@60 $21,782 10 4 21 35
$6,833 2.7@55 $24,583 10 10 12 20 52
$6,039 2.7@55 $26,761 8 8 4 17 37
$6,281 ($334)2@55 $21,747 11 8 7 17 42
$5,528 ($481)2@60 $23,819 8 7 24 39
$3,679 3@60 $19,612 9 8 3 17 37
$21,333 39.9
-8.8%-6.9%
$21,747 38.8
-10.9%-3.8%
$23,819 40.3
-21.4%-8.1%
-4.9%
42 Print Date: 1/26/2022 352
Item 18.

Ralph Andersen & Associates Data Effective June 2021
Beaumont
Community Services Manager 11 Cash Supplements Insurance Benefits Survey Agency Comparable Class Range
Max.Long.Uniform Educ.

Inc.

Def.

Comp.

Ret.

Pickup
Base +
Cash Health Dental Vision Life LTD
Base +
Cash +
Ins.

Banning Recreation Manager $7,251 $275 $7,526 $1,400 inc $21 $39 $8,986 Cathedral City No Comparable Class
Colton Recreation Services Manager $8,239 $8,239 $1,100 inc inc $8 $37 $9,385 Corona Recreation Services Manager $10,813 $167 $10,980 $1,564 inc inc $0 $74 $12,617 Menifee Community Services Manager $10,429 $10,429 $1,800 inc inc $17 $12,246 Murrieta Community Services Manager $8,580 $217 $8,797 $1,563 $98 $40 $17 $58 $10,572 Palm Springs No Comparable Class
Redlands Recreation Services Coordinator $5,879 $294 $6,173 $900 $127 $19 $7,219 Rialto Recreation & Community Srvcs Manager $9,267 $556 $649 $400 $10,872 $1,300 inc inc $12,172 Riverside Recreation Superintendent $10,432 $75 $10,507 $1,482 $45 inc $60 $12,094 San Bernardino Community Recreation Manager $7,218 $7,218 $1,030 inc inc $1 $13 $8,262 Temecula Community Services Manager $10,039 $703 $10,742 $1,600 inc inc $12,342 Upland Recreation Manager $8,444 $380 $591 $9,415 $1,184 inc inc $10,599 Beaumont Community Services Manager $7,880 $7,880 $1,675 inc inc $7 $9,562 Average $8,781 $9,172 $10,590
% +/--11.4%-16.4%-10.8%
Median $8,580 $9,415 $10,599
11 % +/--8.9%-19.5%-10.8%
75th Percenile $10,234 $10,624 $12,209
12 % +/--29.9%-34.8%-27.7%
Median Gain/Loss -10.6%8.6%
43 Print Date: 1/26/2022 353
Item 18.

Ralph Andersen & Associates Data Effective June 2021
Beaumont
Community Services Manager
Survey Agency Comparable Class
Banning Recreation Manager
Cathedral City No Comparable Class
Colton Recreation Services Manager
Corona Recreation Services Manager
Menifee Community Services Manager
Murrieta Community Services Manager
Palm Springs No Comparable Class
Redlands Recreation Services Coordinator
Rialto Recreation & Community Srvcs Manager
Riverside Recreation Superintendent
San Bernardino Community Recreation Manager
Temecula Community Services Manager
Upland Recreation Manager
Beaumont Community Services Manager
Average
% +/-
Median
11 % +/-
75th Percenile
12 % +/-
Retirement Benefits Leave Benefits
Emp. Ret.EE Cont
to ER Ret. Form.

Base +
Cash +
Ins. + Ret.

Hol Sick Admin Vac
Max
Total
Leave
$2,233 2@60 $11,219 10 8 13 31
$2,727 2.5@55 $12,112 11 8 7 13 39
$6,122 2.7@55 $18,739 8 9 25 42
$1,632 2.7@55 $13,879 10 9 5 13 37
$869 2@60 $11,441 9 7 23 39
$1,532 2@55 $8,751 11 8 17 35
$4,381 2.7@55 $16,552 12 10 10 23 54
$3,314 2.7@55 $15,408 8 8 3 15 34
$3,125 ($166)2@55 $11,220 11 8 3 17 39
$3,458 ($301)2@60 $15,498 8 5 24 37
$3,897 ($118)2.5@55 $14,378 11 8 4 15 38
$2,034 3@60 $11,596 9 8 17 34
$13,563 38.6
-17.0%-13.5%
$13,879 37.7
-19.7%-10.8%
$15,453 38.9
-33.3%-14.3%
-8.8%
44 Print Date: 1/26/2022 354
Item 18.

Ralph Andersen & Associates Data Effective June 2021
Beaumont
Customer Service Coordinator II 8 Cash Supplements Insurance Benefits Survey Agency Comparable Class Range
Max.Long.Uniform Educ.

Inc.

Def.

Comp.

Ret.

Pickup
Base +
Cash Health Dental Vision Life LTD
Base +
Cash +
Ins.

Banning Office Specialist $3,931 $3,931 $1,400 inc $21 inc $5,352 Cathedral City No Comparable Class
Colton Customer Service Representative II $3,973 $79 $199 $4,251 $1,100 inc inc $8 $18 $5,377 Corona Customer Service Representative III $4,966 $83 $5,049 $1,564 inc inc $0 $34 $6,647 Menifee No Comparable Class
Murrieta Accounting Assistant $4,461 $100 $4,561 $1,563 $98 $40 $8 $30 $6,300 Palm Springs No Comparable Class
Redlands Customer Service Technician II $4,275 $214 $4,489 $900 $127 $19 $5,535 Rialto No Comparable Class
Riverside Senior Office Specialist $4,233 $4,233 $1,411 $45 inc $3 $5,692 San Bernardino Senior Customer Service Representative $3,967 $3,967 $880 inc inc $1 $7 $4,855 Temecula No Comparable Class
Upland Customer Service Specialist II $4,443 $200 $100 $4,743 $1,267 inc inc $6,010 Beaumont Customer Service Representative $4,808 $481 $5,289 $1,675 inc inc $7 $6,971 Average $4,281 $4,403 $5,721
% +/-11.0%16.8%17.9%
Median $4,254 $4,370 $5,613
8 % +/-11.5%17.4%19.5%
75th Percenile $4,448 $4,606 $6,082
9 % +/-7.5%12.9%12.7%
Median Gain/Loss 5.9%2.1%
45 Print Date: 1/26/2022 355
Item 18.

Ralph Andersen & Associates Data Effective June 2021
Beaumont
Customer Service Coordinator II
Survey Agency Comparable Class
Banning Office Specialist
Cathedral City No Comparable Class
Colton Customer Service Representative II
Corona Customer Service Representative III
Menifee No Comparable Class
Murrieta Accounting Assistant
Palm Springs No Comparable Class
Redlands Customer Service Technician II
Rialto No Comparable Class
Riverside Senior Office Specialist
San Bernardino Senior Customer Service Representative
Temecula No Comparable Class
Upland Customer Service Specialist II
Beaumont Customer Service Representative
Average
% +/-
Median
8 % +/-
75th Percenile
9 % +/-
Retirement Benefits Leave Benefits
Emp. Ret.EE Cont
to ER Ret. Form.

Base +
Cash +
Ins. + Ret.

Hol Sick Admin Vac
Max
Total
Leave
$1,211 2@60 $6,562 11 8 13 32
$1,315 2.5@55 $6,692 11 8 13 32
$2,812 2.7@55 $9,458 8 21 29
$452 2@60 $6,751 9 23 32
$1,114 2@55 $6,649 11 8 17 35
$1,345 2.7@55 $7,036 8 8 13 29
$1,717 ($52)2@55 $6,520 11 8 17 35
$2,051 ($62)2.5@55 $7,998 11 8 15 34
$1,241 3@60 $8,212 9 8 17 34
$7,209 32.3

12.2%4.9%
$6,722 32.2

18.2%5.2%
$7,277 33.9

11.4%0.2%
-1.3%
46 Print Date: 1/26/2022 356
Item 18.

Ralph Andersen & Associates Data Effective June 2021
Beaumont
Deputy City Clerk 4 Cash Supplements Insurance Benefits Survey Agency Comparable Class Range
Max.Long.Uniform Educ.

Inc.

Def.

Comp.

Ret.

Pickup
Base +
Cash Health Dental Vision Life LTD
Base +
Cash +
Ins.

Banning No Comparable Class
Cathedral City No Comparable Class
Colton Chief Deputy City Clerk $5,881 $5,881 $1,100 inc inc $8 $26 $7,016 Corona No Comparable Class
Menifee Deputy City Clerk $6,493 $6,493 $1,800 inc inc $13 $8,306 Murrieta No Comparable Class
Palm Springs Deputy City Clerk $6,161 $308 $6,469 $2,094 inc inc $11 $76 $8,650 Redlands No Comparable Class
Rialto Deputy City Clerk $6,891 $413 $482 $400 $8,187 $1,300 inc inc $9,487 Riverside No Comparable Class
San Bernardino No Comparable Class
Temecula No Comparable Class
Upland No Comparable Class
Beaumont Deputy City Clerk $9,138 $9,138 $1,675 inc inc $7 $10,820 Average $6,357 $6,758 $8,365
% +/-30.4%26.1%22.7%
Median $6,327 $6,481 $8,478
4 % +/-30.8%29.1%21.6%
75th Percenile $6,593 $6,917 $8,860
6 % +/-27.9%24.3%18.1%
Median Gain/Loss -1.7%-7.4%
47 Print Date: 1/26/2022 357
Item 18.

Ralph Andersen & Associates Data Effective June 2021
Beaumont
Deputy City Clerk
Survey Agency Comparable Class
Banning No Comparable Class
Cathedral City No Comparable Class
Colton Chief Deputy City Clerk
Corona No Comparable Class
Menifee Deputy City Clerk
Murrieta No Comparable Class
Palm Springs Deputy City Clerk
Redlands No Comparable Class
Rialto Deputy City Clerk
Riverside No Comparable Class
San Bernardino No Comparable Class
Temecula No Comparable Class
Upland No Comparable Class
Beaumont Deputy City Clerk
Average
% +/-
Median
4 % +/-
75th Percenile
6 % +/-
Retirement Benefits Leave Benefits
Emp. Ret.EE Cont
to ER Ret. Form.

Base +
Cash +
Ins. + Ret.

Hol Sick Admin Vac
Max
Total
Leave
$1,946 2.5@55 $8,962 11 8 7 13 39
$1,016 2.7@55 $9,323 10 9 13 32
$2,163 2@60 $10,813 10 4 21 35
$3,258 2.7@55 $12,744 12 10 10 23 54
$2,359 3@60 $13,179 9 8 17 34
$10,461 40.0

20.6%-17.5%
$10,068 36.8

23.6%-8.4%
$11,296 42.9

14.3%-26.1%

2.0%
48 Print Date: 1/26/2022 358
Item 18.

Ralph Andersen & Associates Data Effective June 2021
Beaumont
Economic Development Manager 12 Cash Supplements Insurance Benefits Survey Agency Comparable Class Range
Max.Long.Uniform Educ.

Inc.

Def.

Comp.

Ret.

Pickup
Base +
Cash Health Dental Vision Life LTD
Base +
Cash +
Ins.

Banning Economic Development Manager $11,033 $275 $11,308 $1,400 inc $21 $39 $12,768 Cathedral City Economic Development Director $16,782 $2,517 $839 $100 $1,175 $21,413 $2,300 inc inc $72 $40 $23,826 Colton Economic Development Manager $9,240 $9,240 $1,100 inc inc $8 $42 $10,390 Corona Economic Development Manager I $9,081 $167 $9,248 $1,564 inc inc $0 $62 $10,873 Menifee Economic Development Director $16,419 $16,419 $1,800 inc inc $17 $18,236 Murrieta Business Development Program Manager $7,393 $217 $7,610 $1,563 $98 $40 $15 $50 $9,375 Palm Springs Central Business District Administrator $9,851 $493 $10,344 $2,094 inc inc $11 $122 $12,571 Redlands Economic Development Manager $11,163 $223 $11,386 $900 $127 $19 $12,432 Rialto No Comparable Class
Riverside Economic Development Manager $14,717 $75 $14,792 $1,482 $45 inc $85 $16,404 San Bernardino Economic Development Division Manager $10,757 $10,757 $1,250 inc inc $7 $19 $12,033 Temecula Economic Development Manager $10,811 $757 $11,568 $1,600 inc inc $13,168 Upland Development Services Manager $9,792 $441 $685 $10,918 $1,184 inc inc $12,102 Beaumont Economic Development Manager $11,133 $11,133 $1,675 inc inc $7 $12,815 Average $11,420 $12,084 $13,681
% +/--2.6%-8.5%-6.8%
Median $10,784 $11,113 $12,502
12 % +/-3.1%0.2%2.4%
75th Percenile $12,052 $12,374 $13,977
12 % +/--8.2%-11.1%-9.1%
Median Gain/Loss -3.0%2.3%
49 Print Date: 1/26/2022 359
Item 18.

Ralph Andersen & Associates Data Effective June 2021
Beaumont
Economic Development Manager
Survey Agency Comparable Class
Banning Economic Development Manager
Cathedral City Economic Development Director
Colton Economic Development Manager
Corona Economic Development Manager I
Menifee Economic Development Director
Murrieta Business Development Program Manager
Palm Springs Central Business District Administrator
Redlands Economic Development Manager
Rialto No Comparable Class
Riverside Economic Development Manager
San Bernardino Economic Development Division Manager
Temecula Economic Development Manager
Upland Development Services Manager
Beaumont Economic Development Manager
Average
% +/-
Median
12 % +/-
75th Percenile
12 % +/-
Retirement Benefits Leave Benefits
Emp. Ret.EE Cont
to ER Ret. Form.

Base +
Cash +
Ins. + Ret.

Hol Sick Admin Vac
Max
Total
Leave
$3,398 2@60 $16,166 11 8 13 32
$1,544 ($1,510)2@60 $23,860 12 8 18 38
$3,058 2.5@55 $13,448 11 8 7 13 39
$5,141 2.7@55 $16,014 8 9 25 42
$2,570 2.7@55 $20,807 10 9 5 13 37
$748 2@60 $10,123 9 7 23 39
$3,458 2@60 $16,029 10 4 21 35
$2,910 2@55 $15,342 9 8 10 17 44
$4,676 2.7@55 $21,079 8 8 3 15 34
$4,657 ($248)2@55 $16,442 11 8 7 17 42
$3,724 ($324)2@60 $16,567 8 5 24 37
$4,520 ($137)2.5@55 $16,485 11 8 4 15 38
$2,874 3@60 $15,689 9 8 17 34
$16,864 37.9
-7.5%-11.6%
$16,304 37.8
-3.9%-11.3%
$17,627 39.7
-12.4%-16.7%
-6.4%
50 Print Date: 1/26/2022 360
Item 18.

Ralph Andersen & Associates Data Effective June 2021
Beaumont
Engineering Development Technician II 13 Cash Supplements Insurance Benefits Survey Agency Comparable Class Range
Max.Long.Uniform Educ.

Inc.

Def.

Comp.

Ret.

Pickup
Base +
Cash Health Dental Vision Life LTD
Base +
Cash +
Ins.

Banning Engineering Services Assistant $4,339 $4,339 $1,400 inc $21 inc $5,760 Cathedral City Engineering Technician I $6,227 $311 $100 $6,638 $2,441 inc inc $15 $9,094 Colton Engineering Technician II $5,660 $113 $283 $6,056 $1,100 inc inc $8 $25 $7,190 Corona Engineering Technician $4,941 $83 $5,024 $1,564 inc inc $0 $34 $6,622 Menifee Engineering Technician II $6,691 $6,691 $1,800 inc inc $13 $8,503 Murrieta Development Services Technician $5,597 $100 $5,697 $1,563 $98 $40 $8 $38 $7,443 Palm Springs Permit Center Technician $6,570 $329 $6,899 $2,106 inc inc $11 $24 $9,040 Redlands Counter Services Technician $4,405 $220 $4,625 $900 $127 $19 $5,671 Rialto Engineering Technician $5,656 $339 $424 $600 $7,020 $1,300 inc inc $8,320 Riverside Engineering Technician $7,481 $4 $7,485 $1,411 $45 inc $3 $8,944 San Bernardino Community Development Technician $4,607 $4,607 $880 inc inc $1 $8 $5,496 Temecula Engineering Technician II $6,599 $264 $6,863 $1,600 inc inc $8,463 Upland Engineering Technician $4,554 $205 $100 $4,859 $1,267 inc inc $6,126 Beaumont Engineering Technician II $5,859 $586 $6,445 $1,675 inc inc $7 $8,127 Average $5,641 $5,908 $7,436
% +/-3.7%8.3%8.5%
Median $5,656 $6,056 $7,443
13 % +/-3.5%6.0%8.4%
75th Percenile $6,570 $6,863 $8,503
13 % +/--12.1%-6.5%-4.6%
Median Gain/Loss 2.6%2.4%
51 Print Date: 1/26/2022 361
Item 18.

Ralph Andersen & Associates Data Effective June 2021
Beaumont
Engineering Development Technician II
Survey Agency Comparable Class
Banning Engineering Services Assistant
Cathedral City Engineering Technician I
Colton Engineering Technician II
Corona Engineering Technician
Menifee Engineering Technician II
Murrieta Development Services Technician
Palm Springs Permit Center Technician
Redlands Counter Services Technician
Rialto Engineering Technician
Riverside Engineering Technician
San Bernardino Community Development Technician
Temecula Engineering Technician II
Upland Engineering Technician
Beaumont Engineering Technician II
Average
% +/-
Median
13 % +/-
75th Percenile
13 % +/-
Retirement Benefits Leave Benefits
Emp. Ret.EE Cont
to ER Ret. Form.

Base +
Cash +
Ins. + Ret.

Hol Sick Admin Vac
Max
Total
Leave
$1,336 2@60 $7,096 11 8 13 32
$573 2@60 $9,667 12 8 18 38
$1,873 2.5@55 $9,063 11 8 13 32
$2,797 2.7@55 $9,419 8 21 29
$1,047 2.7@55 $9,551 10 9 13 32
$567 2@60 $8,010 9 23 32
$2,307 2@60 $11,346 10 21 31
$1,148 2@55 $6,819 11 8 17 35
$2,674 2.7@55 $10,993 12 10 23 44
$2,377 2.7@55 $11,320 8 8 13 29
$1,994 ($60)2@55 $7,430 11 8 17 35
$2,273 2@60 $10,736 8 23 31
$2,102 ($64)2.5@55 $8,164 11 8 15 34
$1,512 3@60 $9,639 9 8 17 34
$9,201 33.4

4.5%1.8%
$9,419 32.2

2.3%5.4%
$10,736 35.2
-11.4%-3.4%
-6.1%
52 Print Date: 1/26/2022 362
Item 18.

Ralph Andersen & Associates Data Effective June 2021
Beaumont
Executive Assistant 13 Cash Supplements Insurance Benefits Survey Agency Comparable Class Range
Max.Long.Uniform Educ.

Inc.

Def.

Comp.

Ret.

Pickup
Base +
Cash Health Dental Vision Life LTD
Base +
Cash +
Ins.

Banning Executive Assistant $5,419 $5,419 $1,400 inc $21 inc $6,840 Cathedral City Administrative Assistant II $7,322 $1,098 $366 $100 $513 $9,399 $2,300 inc inc $32 $18 $11,748 Colton Executive Assistant $5,219 $5,219 $1,100 inc inc $8 $23 $6,351 Corona Executive Assistant II $5,570 $167 $5,737 $1,564 inc inc $0 $38 $7,338 Menifee Executive Assistant $5,819 $5,819 $1,800 inc inc $13 $7,631 Murrieta Executive Assistant $6,374 $133 $6,507 $1,563 $98 $40 $8 $43 $8,259 Palm Springs Executive Administrative Assistant $6,700 $335 $7,035 $2,094 inc inc $11 $83 $9,223 Redlands Senior Administrative Assistant $5,114 $256 $5,370 $900 $127 $19 $6,416 Rialto Executive Assistant $5,656 $339 $396 $400 $6,791 $1,300 inc inc $8,091 Riverside Executive Assistant $6,240 $75 $6,315 $1,482 $45 inc $36 $7,878 San Bernardino Executive Assistant to Director $5,091 $5,091 $1,250 inc inc $5 $9 $6,354 Temecula Executive Assistant $6,280 $440 $6,720 $1,600 inc inc $8,320 Upland Executive Assistant to the CM $5,976 $269 $418 $6,663 $1,184 inc inc $7,847 Beaumont Executive Assistant $5,576 $5,576 $1,675 inc inc $7 $7,258 Average $5,906 $6,314 $7,869
% +/--5.9%-13.2%-8.4%
Median $5,819 $6,315 $7,847
13 % +/--4.3%-13.3%-8.1%
75th Percenile $6,280 $6,720 $8,259
13 % +/--12.6%-20.5%-13.8%
Median Gain/Loss -8.9%5.1%
53 Print Date: 1/26/2022 363
Item 18.

Ralph Andersen & Associates Data Effective June 2021
Beaumont
Executive Assistant
Survey Agency Comparable Class
Banning Executive Assistant
Cathedral City Administrative Assistant II
Colton Executive Assistant
Corona Executive Assistant II
Menifee Executive Assistant
Murrieta Executive Assistant
Palm Springs Executive Administrative Assistant
Redlands Senior Administrative Assistant
Rialto Executive Assistant
Riverside Executive Assistant
San Bernardino Executive Assistant to Director
Temecula Executive Assistant
Upland Executive Assistant to the CM
Beaumont Executive Assistant
Average
% +/-
Median
13 % +/-
75th Percenile
13 % +/-
Retirement Benefits Leave Benefits
Emp. Ret.EE Cont
to ER Ret. Form.

Base +
Cash +
Ins. + Ret.

Hol Sick Admin Vac
Max
Total
Leave
$1,669 2@60 $8,509 11 8 13 32
$674 ($659)2@60 $11,763 12 8 18 38
$1,727 2.5@55 $8,079 11 8 7 13 39
$3,154 2.7@55 $10,492 8 9 25 42
$911 2.7@55 $8,542 10 9 4 13 36
$645 2@60 $8,904 9 23 32
$2,352 2@60 $11,575 10 4 21 35
$1,333 2@55 $7,749 11 8 17 35
$2,674 2.7@55 $10,765 12 10 10 23 54
$1,982 2.7@55 $9,860 8 8 3 15 34
$2,204 ($117)2@55 $8,441 11 8 17 35
$2,163 ($188)2@60 $10,294 8 5 24 37
$2,758 ($84)2.5@55 $10,522 11 8 4 15 38
$1,439 3@60 $8,697 9 8 17 34
$9,653 37.5
-11.0%-10.2%
$9,860 35.9
-13.4%-5.7%
$10,522 38.0
-21.0%-11.8%
-5.3%
54 Print Date: 1/26/2022 364
Item 18.

Ralph Andersen & Associates Data Effective June 2021
Beaumont
Finance Director 13 Cash Supplements Insurance Benefits Survey Agency Comparable Class Range
Max.Long.Uniform Educ.

Inc.

Def.

Comp.

Ret.

Pickup
Base +
Cash Health Dental Vision Life LTD
Base +
Cash +
Ins.

Banning Administrative Services Dir/Deputy CM $15,183 $275 $15,458 $1,667 inc $21 $39 $17,184 Cathedral City Administrative Services Director $18,502 $2,775 $925 $100 $1,295 $23,598 $2,300 inc inc $80 $44 $26,022 Colton Finance Director $14,100 $14,100 $1,183 inc inc $17 $63 $15,363 Corona ACM/Administrative Services Director $18,715 $167 $18,882 $1,564 inc inc $0 $127 $20,573 Menifee Deputy City Manager $18,142 $18,142 $1,800 inc inc $17 $19,959 Murrieta Administrative Services Director $18,034 $250 $18,284 $1,563 $98 $40 $36 $123 $20,143 Palm Springs Director of Finance & Treasurer $16,132 $807 $16,939 $2,094 inc inc $11 $200 $19,244 Redlands Director of Management Services $17,738 $355 $18,093 $2,706 $127 $19 $20,945 Rialto Finance Director $16,354 $1,227 $750 $18,331 $1,300 $137 $25 $19,793 Riverside Chief Financial Officer/City Treasurer $19,958 $75 $20,033 $1,482 $45 inc $115 $21,675 San Bernardino Director of Finance $17,020 $17,020 $1,250 inc inc $18 $30 $18,318 Temecula Director of Finance $16,049 $1,123 $17,172 $1,600 inc inc $18,772 Upland Asst City Manager (Administrative Services)$16,858 $421 $1,517 $18,797 $1,184 inc inc $19,981 Beaumont Finance Director $14,974 $14,974 $1,675 inc inc $7 $16,656 Average $17,137 $18,065 $19,844
% +/--14.4%-20.6%-19.1%
Median $17,020 $18,142 $19,959
13 % +/--13.7%-21.2%-19.8%
75th Percenile $18,142 $18,797 $20,573
13 % +/--21.2%-25.5%-23.5%
Median Gain/Loss -7.5%1.3%
55 Print Date: 1/26/2022 365
Item 18.

Ralph Andersen & Associates Data Effective June 2021
Beaumont
Finance Director
Survey Agency Comparable Class
Banning Administrative Services Dir/Deputy CM
Cathedral City Administrative Services Director
Colton Finance Director
Corona ACM/Administrative Services Director
Menifee Deputy City Manager
Murrieta Administrative Services Director
Palm Springs Director of Finance & Treasurer
Redlands Director of Management Services
Rialto Finance Director
Riverside Chief Financial Officer/City Treasurer
San Bernardino Director of Finance
Temecula Director of Finance
Upland Asst City Manager (Administrative Services)
Beaumont Finance Director
Average
% +/-
Median
13 % +/-
75th Percenile
13 % +/-
Retirement Benefits Leave Benefits
Emp. Ret.EE Cont
to ER Ret. Form.

Base +
Cash +
Ins. + Ret.

Hol Sick Admin Vac
Max
Total
Leave
$4,676 2@60 $21,861 11 8 8 13 40
$1,703 ($1,665)2@60 $26,059 12 8 18 38
$4,666 2.5@55 $20,029 12 8 7 13 40
$10,596 2.7@55 $31,168 8 9 25 42
$2,840 2.7@55 $22,799 10 9 5 13 37
$1,826 2@60 $21,968 9 10 23 42
$5,663 2@60 $24,907 10 4 21 35
$4,623 2@55 $25,568 9 33 42
$7,731 2.7@55 $27,524 10 10 12 20 52
$6,341 2.7@55 $28,016 8 8 4 17 37
$7,368 ($392)2@55 $25,294 11 8 7 17 42
$5,528 ($481)2@60 $23,819 8 7 24 39
$7,781 ($236)2.5@55 $27,526 11 8 7 15 40
$3,865 3@60 $20,521 9 8 3 17 37
$25,118 40.3
-22.4%-8.0%
$25,294 40.2
-23.3%-7.6%
$27,524 41.7
-34.1%-11.6%
-3.4%
56 Print Date: 1/26/2022 366
Item 18.

Ralph Andersen & Associates Data Effective June 2021
Beaumont
HR/Payroll Technician 13 Cash Supplements Insurance Benefits Survey Agency Comparable Class Range
Max.Long.Uniform Educ.

Inc.

Def.

Comp.

Ret.

Pickup
Base +
Cash Health Dental Vision Life LTD
Base +
Cash +
Ins.

Banning Human Resources Technician $5,032 $275 $5,307 $1,400 inc $21 $39 $6,767 Cathedral City Payroll Coordinator $7,322 $1,098 $366 $100 $513 $9,399 $2,300 inc inc $32 $18 $11,748 Colton Payroll Technician II $4,900 $98 $245 $5,243 $1,100 inc inc $8 $22 $6,373 Corona Payroll Technician III $5,654 $167 $5,821 $1,564 inc inc $0 $38 $7,423 Menifee Accounting Technician II $5,536 $5,536 $1,800 inc inc $13 $7,348 Murrieta Human Resources Technician $5,260 $133 $5,393 $1,563 $98 $40 $8 $36 $7,137 Palm Springs Payroll Coordinator $7,146 $357 $7,503 $2,094 inc inc $11 $89 $9,697 Redlands Human Resources Technician $4,723 $236 $4,959 $900 $127 $19 $6,005 Rialto Accounting Technician $5,518 $331 $414 $600 $6,863 $1,300 inc inc $8,163 Riverside Accounting Technician $5,161 $5,161 $1,411 $45 inc $3 $6,620 San Bernardino Payroll Technician $4,607 $4,607 $1,250 inc inc $5 $8 $5,870 Temecula Human Resources Technician II $6,599 $462 $7,061 $1,600 inc inc $8,661 Upland Payroll Technician $5,688 $256 $100 $6,044 $1,267 inc inc $7,311 Beaumont HR/Payroll Technician $5,307 $531 $5,838 $1,675 inc inc $7 $7,520 Average $5,627 $6,069 $7,625
% +/--6.0%-4.0%-1.4%
Median $5,518 $5,536 $7,311
13 % +/--4.0%5.2%2.8%
75th Percenile $5,688 $6,863 $8,163
13 % +/--7.2%-17.6%-8.5%
Median Gain/Loss 9.2%-2.4%
57 Print Date: 1/26/2022 367
Item 18.

Ralph Andersen & Associates Data Effective June 2021
Beaumont
HR/Payroll Technician
Survey Agency Comparable Class
Banning Human Resources Technician
Cathedral City Payroll Coordinator
Colton Payroll Technician II
Corona Payroll Technician III
Menifee Accounting Technician II
Murrieta Human Resources Technician
Palm Springs Payroll Coordinator
Redlands Human Resources Technician
Rialto Accounting Technician
Riverside Accounting Technician
San Bernardino Payroll Technician
Temecula Human Resources Technician II
Upland Payroll Technician
Beaumont HR/Payroll Technician
Average
% +/-
Median
13 % +/-
75th Percenile
13 % +/-
Retirement Benefits Leave Benefits
Emp. Ret.EE Cont
to ER Ret. Form.

Base +
Cash +
Ins. + Ret.

Hol Sick Admin Vac
Max
Total
Leave
$1,550 2@60 $8,317 10 8 13 31
$674 ($659)2@60 $11,763 12 8 18 38
$1,621 2.5@55 $7,995 11 8 13 32
$3,201 2.7@55 $10,624 8 25 33
$866 2.7@55 $8,215 10 9 13 32
$533 2@60 $7,670 9 23 32
$2,509 2@60 $12,206 10 4 21 35
$1,231 2@55 $7,236 11 8 17 35
$2,608 2.7@55 $10,771 12 10 23 44
$1,640 2.7@55 $8,259 8 8 13 29
$1,994 ($106)2@55 $7,758 11 8 17 35
$2,273 ($198)2@60 $10,736 8 5 24 37
$2,625 ($80)2.5@55 $9,857 11 8 15 34
$1,370 3@60 $8,890 9 8 17 34
$9,339 34.4
-5.0%-1.3%
$8,317 33.5

6.5%1.5%
$10,736 35.3
-20.8%-3.9%

3.7%
58 Print Date: 1/26/2022 368
Item 18.

Ralph Andersen & Associates Data Effective June 2021
Beaumont
Information Technology Manager 12 Cash Supplements Insurance Benefits Survey Agency Comparable Class Range
Max.Long.Uniform Educ.

Inc.

Def.

Comp.

Ret.

Pickup
Base +
Cash Health Dental Vision Life LTD
Base +
Cash +
Ins.

Banning Information Technology Manager $9,282 $275 $9,557 $1,400 inc $21 $39 $11,016 Cathedral City Chief Technology Officer $13,807 $2,071 $690 $100 $966 $17,635 $2,300 inc inc $60 $33 $20,028 Colton No Comparable Class
Corona Chief Information Officer $16,114 $167 $16,281 $1,564 inc inc $0 $110 $17,954 Menifee Information Technology Director $17,259 $17,259 $1,800 inc inc $17 $19,076 Murrieta Information Technology Manager $11,296 $150 $11,446 $1,563 $98 $40 $23 $77 $13,245 Palm Springs Information Technology Manager $11,997 $600 $12,597 $2,094 inc inc $11 $149 $14,851 Redlands IT Operations Manager $9,504 $72 $9,576 $913 $127 $19 $10,634 Rialto Information Technology Systems Manager $11,291 $677 $790 $400 $13,159 $1,300 inc inc $14,459 Riverside Chief Innovation Officer $19,010 $75 $19,085 $1,482 $45 inc $109 $20,721 San Bernardino Director of Information Technology $14,509 $14,509 $1,250 inc inc $16 $25 $15,800 Temecula Director of IT/Support Svcs $14,903 $1,043 $15,946 $1,600 inc inc $17,546 Upland Information Technology Manager $10,037 $452 $703 $11,191 $1,184 inc inc $12,375 Beaumont Information Technology Manager $11,412 $11,412 $1,675 inc inc $7 $13,094 Average $13,251 $14,020 $15,642
% +/--16.1%-22.9%-19.5%
Median $12,902 $13,834 $15,325
12 % +/--13.1%-21.2%-17.0%
75th Percenile $15,206 $16,525 $18,234
12 % +/--33.2%-44.8%-39.3%
Median Gain/Loss -8.2%4.2%
59 Print Date: 1/26/2022 369
Item 18.

Ralph Andersen & Associates Data Effective June 2021
Beaumont
Information Technology Manager
Survey Agency Comparable Class
Banning Information Technology Manager
Cathedral City Chief Technology Officer
Colton No Comparable Class
Corona Chief Information Officer
Menifee Information Technology Director
Murrieta Information Technology Manager
Palm Springs Information Technology Manager
Redlands IT Operations Manager
Rialto Information Technology Systems Manager
Riverside Chief Innovation Officer
San Bernardino Director of Information Technology
Temecula Director of IT/Support Svcs
Upland Information Technology Manager
Beaumont Information Technology Manager
Average
% +/-
Median
12 % +/-
75th Percenile
12 % +/-
Retirement Benefits Leave Benefits
Emp. Ret.EE Cont
to ER Ret. Form.

Base +
Cash +
Ins. + Ret.

Hol Sick Admin Vac
Max
Total
Leave
$2,859 2@60 $13,875 10 8 13 31
$1,271 ($1,243)2@60 $20,056 12 8 18 38
$9,123 2.7@55 $27,077 8 9 25 42
$2,702 2.7@55 $21,778 10 9 5 13 37
$1,144 2@60 $14,389 9 5 23 37
$4,212 2@60 $19,062 10 4 21 35
$2,477 2@55 $13,111 11 8 10 17 45
$5,337 2.7@55 $19,796 12 10 10 23 54
$6,039 2.7@55 $26,761 8 8 4 17 37
$6,281 ($334)2@55 $21,747 11 8 7 17 42
$5,133 ($447)2@60 $22,232 8 5 24 37
$4,633 ($141)2.5@55 $16,868 11 8 4 15 38
$2,946 3@60 $16,040 9 8 17 34
$19,729 39.4
-23.0%-15.8%
$19,926 37.4
-24.2%-9.9%
$21,891 41.7
-36.5%-22.7%
-7.2%
60 Print Date: 1/26/2022 370
Item 18.

Ralph Andersen & Associates Data Effective June 2021
Beaumont
IT Analyst II 12 Cash Supplements Insurance Benefits
Survey Agency Comparable Class Range
Max.Long.Uniform Educ.

Inc.

Def.

Comp.

Ret.

Pickup
Base +
Cash Health Dental Vision Life LTD
Base +
Cash +
Ins.

Banning Information Technology Analyst II $7,470 $7,470 $1,400 inc $21 inc $8,891 Cathedral City Enterprise Applications Engineer $9,345 $1,402 $467 $100 $654 $11,968 $2,300 inc inc $40 $22 $14,331 Colton Information Technology Coordinator $7,266 $7,266 $1,100 inc inc $8 $33 $8,407 Corona Network Analyst $7,076 $83 $7,159 $1,564 inc inc $0 $48 $8,771 Menifee Information Technology Analyst $8,458 $8,458 $1,800 inc inc $13 $10,271 Murrieta Information Technology Analyst $7,539 $150 $7,689 $1,563 $98 $40 $15 $51 $9,455 Palm Springs Information Technology Analyst $7,509 $375 $7,884 $2,094 inc inc $11 $93 $10,083 Redlands System Administrator $7,485 $72 $7,557 $913 $127 $19 $8,615 Rialto Information Systems Analyst $7,063 $424 $494 $400 $8,381 $1,300 inc inc $9,681 Riverside Innovation & Technology Analyst II $8,303 $75 $8,378 $1,482 $45 inc $48 $9,953 San Bernardino Information Technology Analyst II $7,218 $7,218 $1,250 inc inc $5 $13 $8,485 Temecula Information Technology Specialist II $7,105 $284 $7,389 $1,600 inc inc $8,989 Upland No Comparable Class
Beaumont IT Analyst II $6,309 $631 $6,940 $1,675 inc inc $7 $8,622 IT Analyst IIAvg Average $7,653 $8,068 $9,661
% +/--21.3%-16.3%-12.0%
Median $7,477 $7,623 $9,222
12 % +/--18.5%-9.8%-7.0%
75th Percenile $7,730 $8,379 $9,985
12 % +/--22.5%-20.7%-15.8%
Median Gain/Loss 8.7%2.9%
61 Print Date: 1/26/2022 371
Item 18.

Ralph Andersen & Associates Data Effective June 2021
Beaumont
IT Analyst II
Survey Agency Comparable Class
Banning Information Technology Analyst II
Cathedral City Enterprise Applications Engineer
Colton Information Technology Coordinator
Corona Network Analyst
Menifee Information Technology Analyst
Murrieta Information Technology Analyst
Palm Springs Information Technology Analyst
Redlands System Administrator
Rialto Information Systems Analyst
Riverside Innovation & Technology Analyst II
San Bernardino Information Technology Analyst II
Temecula Information Technology Specialist II
Upland No Comparable Class
Beaumont IT Analyst II
IT Analyst IIAvg Average
% +/-
Median
12 % +/-
75th Percenile
12 % +/-
Retirement Benefits Leave Benefits
Emp. Ret.EE Cont
to ER Ret. Form.

Base +
Cash +
Ins. + Ret.

Hol Sick Admin Vac
Max
Total
Leave
$2,301 2@60 $11,192 11 8 13 32
$860 ($841)2@60 $14,350 12 8 18 38
$2,404 2.5@55 $10,811 11 8 7 13 39
$4,006 2.7@55 $12,777 8 21 29
$1,324 2.7@55 $11,595 10 9 4 13 36
$763 2@60 $10,219 9 5 23 37
$2,636 2@60 $12,719 10 4 21 35
$1,951 2@55 $10,566 11 8 10 17 45
$3,339 2.7@55 $13,020 12 10 10 23 54
$2,638 2.7@55 $12,591 8 8 3 15 34
$3,125 ($166)2@55 $11,444 11 8 17 35
$2,447 2@60 $11,436 8 23 31
$1,629 3@60 $10,251 9 8 17 34
$11,893 37.1
-16.0%-9.1%
$11,519 35.5
-12.4%-4.5%
$12,733 38.2
-24.2%-12.5%
-5.4%
62 Print Date: 1/26/2022 372
Item 18.

Ralph Andersen & Associates Data Effective June 2021
Beaumont
Management Analyst 12 Cash Supplements Insurance Benefits Survey Agency Comparable Class Range
Max.Long.Uniform Educ.

Inc.

Def.

Comp.

Ret.

Pickup
Base +
Cash Health Dental Vision Life LTD
Base +
Cash +
Ins.

Banning Management Analyst $7,251 $275 $7,526 $1,400 inc $21 $39 $8,986 Cathedral City Senior Analyst $8,073 $1,211 $404 $100 $565 $10,353 $2,300 inc inc $35 $19 $12,707 Colton Administrative Analyst II $6,240 $6,240 $1,100 inc inc $8 $28 $7,376 Corona Management Analyst II $7,328 $167 $7,495 $1,564 inc inc $0 $50 $9,108 Menifee Management Analyst II $8,458 $8,458 $1,800 inc inc $13 $10,271 Murrieta Management Analyst $7,576 $217 $7,793 $1,563 $98 $40 $15 $52 $9,559 Palm Springs No Comparable Class
Redlands Management Analyst $7,121 $72 $7,193 $913 $127 $19 $8,251 Rialto Administrative Analyst $6,723 $403 $471 $400 $7,997 $1,300 inc inc $9,297 Riverside Management Analyst $6,862 $75 $6,937 $1,482 $45 inc $40 $8,503 San Bernardino Administrative Analyst II $6,532 $6,532 $1,250 inc inc $7 $11 $7,800 Temecula Management Analyst $8,039 $563 $8,602 $1,600 inc inc $10,202 Upland Management Analyst $6,435 $290 $450 $7,175 $1,184 inc inc $8,359 Beaumont Management Analyst $7,880 $788 $8,668 $1,675 inc inc $7 $10,350 Average $7,220 $7,692 $9,202
% +/-8.4%11.3%11.1%
Median $7,186 $7,510 $9,047
12 % +/-8.8%13.4%12.6%
75th Percenile $7,692 $8,112 $9,720
12 % +/-2.4%6.4%6.1%
Median Gain/Loss 4.5%-0.8%
63 Print Date: 1/26/2022 373
Item 18.

Ralph Andersen & Associates Data Effective June 2021
Beaumont
Management Analyst
Survey Agency Comparable Class
Banning Management Analyst
Cathedral City Senior Analyst
Colton Administrative Analyst II
Corona Management Analyst II
Menifee Management Analyst II
Murrieta Management Analyst
Palm Springs No Comparable Class
Redlands Management Analyst
Rialto Administrative Analyst
Riverside Management Analyst
San Bernardino Administrative Analyst II
Temecula Management Analyst
Upland Management Analyst
Beaumont Management Analyst
Average
% +/-
Median
12 % +/-
75th Percenile
12 % +/-
Retirement Benefits Leave Benefits
Emp. Ret.EE Cont
to ER Ret. Form.

Base +
Cash +
Ins. + Ret.

Hol Sick Admin Vac
Max
Total
Leave
$2,233 2@60 $11,219 11 8 13 32
$743 ($727)2@60 $12,723 12 8 18 38
$2,065 2.5@55 $9,442 11 8 7 13 39
$4,149 2.7@55 $13,257 8 9 25 42
$1,324 2.7@55 $11,595 10 9 4 13 36
$767 2@60 $10,326 9 7 23 39
$1,856 2@55 $10,107 11 8 10 17 45
$3,178 2.7@55 $12,475 12 10 10 23 54
$2,180 2.7@55 $10,683 8 8 3 15 34
$2,828 ($150)2@55 $10,477 11 8 7 17 42
$2,769 ($241)2@60 $12,729 8 5 24 37
$2,970 ($90)2.5@55 $11,239 11 8 4 15 38
$2,034 3@60 $12,384 9 8 17 34
$11,356 39.6

8.3%-16.6%
$11,229 38.4

9.3%-12.8%
$12,537 41.7
-1.2%-22.7%
-3.3%
64 Print Date: 1/26/2022 374
Item 18.

Ralph Andersen & Associates Data Effective June 2021
Beaumont
Mechanic 12 Cash Supplements Insurance Benefits
Survey Agency Comparable Class Range
Max.Long.Uniform Educ.

Inc.

Def.

Comp.

Ret.

Pickup
Base +
Cash Health Dental Vision Life LTD
Base +
Cash +
Ins.

Banning Fleet Maintenance Mechanic $4,909 $4,909 $1,400 inc $21 inc $6,330 Cathedral City No Comparable Class
Colton Equipment Mechanic $4,560 $91 $228 $4,880 $1,100 inc inc $8 $21 $6,009 Corona Fleet Services Technician $5,016 $83 $5,099 $1,564 inc inc $0 $34 $6,697 Menifee No Comparable Class
Murrieta No Comparable Class
Omnitrans Equipment Mechanic $5,663 $5,663 $1,355 inc inc $14 $52 $7,084 Palm Springs Maintenance Technician III - Fleet $6,409 $320 $6,729 $2,106 inc inc $11 $24 $8,870 Redlands Mechanic II $5,165 $258 $5,423 $900 $127 $19 $6,469 Rialto Equipment Mechanic $5,124 $307 $384 $600 $6,416 $1,300 inc inc $7,716 Riverside Mechanic $5,065 $7 $5,072 $1,411 $45 inc $3 $6,531 RTA Mechanic $6,061 $6,061 $1,217 $7,278
San Bernardino Equipment Mechanic II $4,843 $4,843 $880 inc inc $1 $8 $5,732 Sunline Mechanic $5,458 $25 $5,483 $1,432 $6,915
Temecula No Comparable Class
Upland Equipment Mechanic $5,027 $226 $100 $5,353 $1,267 inc inc $6,620 Beaumont Equipment Mechanic $5,576 $558 $6,134 $1,675 inc inc $7 $7,816 MechanicAvg Average $5,275 $5,494 $6,854
MechanicAvgPct % +/-5.4%10.4%12.3%
MechanicMedian Median $5,095 $5,388 $6,659
12 % +/-8.6%12.2%14.8%
75th Percenile $5,509 $5,762 $7,132
13 % +/-1.2%6.1%8.7%
Median Gain/Loss 3.5%2.7%
65 Print Date: 1/26/2022 375
Item 18.

Ralph Andersen & Associates Data Effective June 2021
Beaumont
Mechanic
Survey Agency Comparable Class
Banning Fleet Maintenance Mechanic
Cathedral City No Comparable Class
Colton Equipment Mechanic
Corona Fleet Services Technician
Menifee No Comparable Class
Murrieta No Comparable Class
Omnitrans Equipment Mechanic
Palm Springs Maintenance Technician III - Fleet
Redlands Mechanic II
Rialto Equipment Mechanic
Riverside Mechanic
RTA Mechanic
San Bernardino Equipment Mechanic II
Sunline Mechanic
Temecula No Comparable Class
Upland Equipment Mechanic
Beaumont Equipment Mechanic
MechanicAvg Average
MechanicAvgPct % +/-
MechanicMedian Median
12 % +/-
75th Percenile
13 % +/-
Retirement Benefits Leave Benefits
Emp. Ret.EE Cont
to ER Ret. Form.

Base +
Cash +
Ins. + Ret.

Hol Sick Admin Vac
Max
Total
Leave
$1,512 2@60 $7,842 11 8 13 32
$1,509 2.5@55 $7,518 11 8 13 32
$2,840 2.7@55 $9,537 8 21 29
$930 2%@55 $8,014 7 8 17 32
$2,250 2@60 $11,120 10 21 31
$1,346 2@55 $7,816 11 8 17 35
$2,422 2.7@55 $10,138 12 10 23 44
$1,609 2.7@55 $8,140 8 8 13 29
$606 2%@55 $7,884 9 8 20 37
$2,097 ($63)2@55 $7,766 11 8 17 35
2%@60 $6,915 4 7 25 36
$2,320 ($70)2.5@55 $8,870 11 8 15 34
$1,439 3@60 $9,255 9 8 17 34
$8,463 33.9

8.6%0.3%
$7,949 32.9

14.1%3.2%
$9,037 35.5

2.4%-4.4%
-0.7%
66 Print Date: 1/26/2022 376
Item 18.

Ralph Andersen & Associates Data Effective June 2021
Beaumont
Planning Manager 11 Cash Supplements Insurance Benefits Survey Agency Comparable Class Range
Max.Long.Uniform Educ.

Inc.

Def.

Comp.

Ret.

Pickup
Base +
Cash Health Dental Vision Life LTD
Base +
Cash +
Ins.

Banning No Comparable Class
Cathedral City No Comparable Class
Colton Planning Manager $8,739 $8,739 $1,100 inc inc $8 $39 $9,886 Corona Planning Manager $11,365 $167 $11,532 $1,564 inc inc $0 $77 $13,173 Menifee Planning Manager $12,924 $12,924 $1,800 inc inc $17 $14,741 Murrieta City Planner $12,746 $217 $12,963 $1,563 $98 $40 $25 $87 $14,775 Palm Springs Assistant Director of Planning $12,003 $600 $12,603 $2,094 inc inc $11 $149 $14,857 Redlands City Planner $11,728 $235 $11,963 $900 $127 $19 $13,009 Rialto Community Development Manager $11,574 $694 $868 $400 $13,536 $1,300 inc inc $14,836 Riverside City Planner $12,797 $75 $12,872 $1,482 $45 inc $74 $14,473 San Bernardino Planning Division Manager $9,784 $9,784 $1,250 inc inc $7 $17 $11,058 Temecula Planning Manager $12,232 $856 $13,088 $1,600 inc inc $14,688 Upland Planning Manager $10,288 $463 $720 $11,471 $1,184 inc inc $12,655 Beaumont Planning Manager $10,086 $10,086 $1,675 inc inc $7 $11,768 Average $11,471 $11,952 $13,468
% +/--13.7%-18.5%-14.4%
Median $11,728 $12,603 $14,473
11 % +/--16.3%-25.0%-23.0%
75th Percenile $12,489 $12,943 $14,758
13 % +/--23.8%-28.3%-25.4%
Median Gain/Loss -8.7%2.0%
67 Print Date: 1/26/2022 377
Item 18.

Ralph Andersen & Associates Data Effective June 2021
Beaumont
Planning Manager
Survey Agency Comparable Class
Banning No Comparable Class
Cathedral City No Comparable Class
Colton Planning Manager
Corona Planning Manager
Menifee Planning Manager
Murrieta City Planner
Palm Springs Assistant Director of Planning
Redlands City Planner
Rialto Community Development Manager
Riverside City Planner
San Bernardino Planning Division Manager
Temecula Planning Manager
Upland Planning Manager
Beaumont Planning Manager
Average
% +/-
Median
11 % +/-
75th Percenile
13 % +/-
Retirement Benefits Leave Benefits
Emp. Ret.EE Cont
to ER Ret. Form.

Base +
Cash +
Ins. + Ret.

Hol Sick Admin Vac
Max
Total
Leave
$2,892 2.5@55 $12,778 11 8 7 13 39
$6,435 2.7@55 $19,607 8 9 25 42
$2,023 2.7@55 $16,764 10 9 5 13 37
$1,290 2@60 $16,065 9 7 23 39
$4,214 2@60 $19,071 10 4 21 35
$3,057 2@55 $16,065 9 8 10 17 44
$5,471 2.7@55 $20,308 10 10 10 23 53
$4,066 2.7@55 $18,538 8 8 3 15 34
$4,236 ($225)2@55 $15,068 11 8 7 17 42
$4,213 ($367)2@60 $18,534 8 5 24 37
$4,749 ($144)2.5@55 $17,260 11 8 4 15 38
$2,603 3@60 $14,372 9 8 17 34
$17,278 39.8
-20.2%-17.1%
$17,260 38.7
-20.1%-13.9%
$18,805 41.7
-30.8%-22.8%

2.9%
68 Print Date: 1/26/2022 378
Item 18.

Ralph Andersen & Associates Data Effective June 2021
Beaumont
Police Services Analyst 9 Cash Supplements Insurance Benefits Survey Agency Comparable Class Range
Max.Long.Uniform Educ.

Inc.

Def.

Comp.

Ret.

Pickup
Base +
Cash Health Dental Vision Life LTD
Base +
Cash +
Ins.

Banning No Comparable Class
Cathedral City Crime Analyst $7,207 $360 $100 $7,667 $2,441 inc inc $17 $10,125 Colton No Comparable Class
Corona Crime Analyst $6,185 $83 $6,268 $1,564 inc inc $0 $42 $7,874 Menifee Crime Analyst $8,458 $8,458 $1,800 inc inc $13 $10,271 Murrieta Crime Analyst $6,568 $100 $6,668 $1,563 $98 $40 $8 $45 $8,421 Palm Springs Crime Analyst $6,251 $313 $6,564 $2,106 inc inc $11 $23 $8,704 Redlands Crime Analyst $6,809 $130 $6,939 $900 $127 $19 $7,985 Rialto Crime Analyst Supervisor $6,636 $398 $498 $750 $8,282 $1,300 inc inc $9,582 Riverside Crime Analyst $6,881 $6,881 $1,411 $45 inc $3 $8,340 San Bernardino Crime Analyst $5,625 $5,625 $880 inc inc $1 $10 $6,516 Temecula No Comparable Class
Upland No Comparable Class
Beaumont Police Services Analyst $7,316 $100 $732 $8,148 $1,500 inc inc $7 $9,655 Average $6,736 $7,039 $8,646
% +/-7.9%13.6%10.4%
Median $6,636 $6,881 $8,421
9 % +/-9.3%15.6%12.8%
75th Percenile $6,881 $7,667 $9,582
10 % +/-6.0%5.9%0.8%
Median Gain/Loss 6.3%-2.8%
69 Print Date: 1/26/2022 379
Item 18.

Ralph Andersen & Associates Data Effective June 2021
Beaumont
Police Services Analyst
Survey Agency Comparable Class
Banning No Comparable Class
Cathedral City Crime Analyst
Colton No Comparable Class
Corona Crime Analyst
Menifee Crime Analyst
Murrieta Crime Analyst
Palm Springs Crime Analyst
Redlands Crime Analyst
Rialto Crime Analyst Supervisor
Riverside Crime Analyst
San Bernardino Crime Analyst
Temecula No Comparable Class
Upland No Comparable Class
Beaumont Police Services Analyst
Average
% +/-
Median
9 % +/-
75th Percenile
10 % +/-
Retirement Benefits Leave Benefits
Emp. Ret.EE Cont
to ER Ret. Form.

Base +
Cash +
Ins. + Ret.

Hol Sick Admin Vac
Max
Total
Leave
$663 2@60 $10,789 12 8 18 38
$3,502 2.7@55 $11,376 8 21 29
$1,324 2.7@55 $11,595 10 9 4 13 36
$665 2@60 $9,086 9 23 32
$2,195 2@60 $10,898 10 21 31
$1,775 2@55 $9,760 9 8 17 34
$3,137 2.7@55 $12,719 11 10 23 44
$2,186 2.7@55 $10,526 8 8 13 29
$2,435 ($73)2@55 $8,878 11 8 17 35
$1,889 3@60 $11,544 9 8 17 34
$10,625 34.1

8.0%-0.3%
$10,789 33.7

6.5%1.0%
$11,376 35.9

1.5%-5.6%
-6.2%
70 Print Date: 1/26/2022 380
Item 18.

Ralph Andersen & Associates Data Effective June 2021
Beaumont
Public Safety Dispatcher II 11 Cash Supplements Insurance Benefits Survey Agency Comparable Class Range
Max.Long.Uniform Educ.

Inc.

Def.

Comp.

Ret.

Pickup
Base +
Cash Health Dental Vision Life LTD
Base +
Cash +
Ins.

Banning Public Safety Dispatcher $4,789 $4,789 $1,400 inc $21 inc $6,210 Cathedral City Public Safety Dispatcher II $6,535 $327 $75 $100 $7,037 $2,441 inc inc $16 $9,493 Colton Police Dispatcher II $4,801 $75 $4,876 $1,100 inc inc $8 $22 $6,006 Corona Public Safety Dispatcher II $5,598 $83 $5,681 $1,564 inc inc $0 $38 $7,283 Menifee No Comparable Class
Murrieta Public Safety Dispatcher II $6,084 $50 $100 $6,234 $1,563 $98 $40 $8 $41 $7,984 Palm Springs Dispatcher $6,099 $305 $6,404 $2,106 inc inc $11 $23 $8,544 Redlands Dispatcher III $5,362 $142 $72 $5,575 $900 $127 $19 $6,621 Rialto Emergency Dispatcher II $5,209 $313 $67 $391 $600 $6,579 $1,300 inc inc $7,879 Riverside Public Safety Dispatcher II $6,229 $26 $6,255 $1,411 $45 inc $3 $7,713 San Bernardino Police Dispatcher II $4,843 $4,843 $880 inc inc $1 $8 $5,732 Temecula No Comparable Class
Upland Police Dispatcher II $5,153 $232 $25 $100 $5,510 $1,267 inc inc $6,777 Beaumont Public Safety Dispatcher II $5,179 $100 $518 $5,797 $1,500 inc inc $7 $7,304 Average $5,518 $5,798 $7,295
% +/--6.5%0.0%0.1%
Median $5,362 $5,681 $7,283
11 % +/--3.5%2.0%0.3%
75th Percenile $6,092 $6,329 $7,931
11 % +/--17.6%-9.2%-8.6%
Median Gain/Loss 5.5%-1.7%
71 Print Date: 1/26/2022 381
Item 18.

Ralph Andersen & Associates Data Effective June 2021
Beaumont
Public Safety Dispatcher II
Survey Agency Comparable Class
Banning Public Safety Dispatcher
Cathedral City Public Safety Dispatcher II
Colton Police Dispatcher II
Corona Public Safety Dispatcher II
Menifee No Comparable Class
Murrieta Public Safety Dispatcher II
Palm Springs Dispatcher
Redlands Dispatcher III
Rialto Emergency Dispatcher II
Riverside Public Safety Dispatcher II
San Bernardino Police Dispatcher II
Temecula No Comparable Class
Upland Police Dispatcher II
Beaumont Public Safety Dispatcher II
Average
% +/-
Median
11 % +/-
75th Percenile
11 % +/-
Retirement Benefits Leave Benefits
Emp. Ret.EE Cont
to ER Ret. Form.

Base +
Cash +
Ins. + Ret.

Hol Sick Admin Vac
Max
Total
Leave
$1,475 2@60 $7,686 11 8 13 32
$601 2@60 $10,095 12 8 18 38
$1,589 2.5@55 $7,595 12 8 13 33
$3,169 2.7@55 $10,452 8 21 29
$616 2@60 $8,600 9 23 32
$2,141 2@60 $10,685 10 21 31
$1,398 2@55 $8,019 9 8 17 34
$2,462 2.7@55 $10,341 11 10 23 44
$1,979 2.7@55 $9,692 8 8 13 29
$2,097 ($63)2@55 $7,766 11 8 17 35
$2,378 ($72)2.5@55 $9,083 11 8 15 34
$1,337 3@60 $8,641 9 8 17 34
$9,092 33.6
-5.2%1.1%
$9,083 33.0
-5.1%2.9%
$10,218 34.4
-18.2%-1.2%
-5.4%
72 Print Date: 1/26/2022 382
Item 18.

Ralph Andersen & Associates Data Effective June 2021
Beaumont
Public Works Inspector 12 Cash Supplements Insurance Benefits Survey Agency Comparable Class Range
Max.Long.Uniform Educ.

Inc.

Def.

Comp.

Ret.

Pickup
Base +
Cash Health Dental Vision Life LTD
Base +
Cash +
Ins.

Banning Public Works Inspector $6,131 $6,131 $1,400 inc $21 inc $7,552 Cathedral City No Comparable Class
Colton Public Works and Utility Inspector $6,462 $42 $323 $6,827 $1,100 inc inc $13 $29 $7,968 Corona Public Works Inspector II $5,570 $83 $5,653 $1,564 inc inc $0 $38 $7,255 Menifee Public Works Inspector II $7,210 $7,210 $1,800 inc inc $13 $9,023 Murrieta Public Works Inspector $6,393 $100 $6,493 $1,563 $98 $40 $8 $43 $8,245 Palm Springs Public Works Inspector $7,075 $354 $7,429 $2,106 inc inc $11 $26 $9,572 Redlands Construction Inspector II $7,173 $359 $7,532 $900 $127 $19 $8,578 Rialto Construction Inspector $6,090 $365 $457 $600 $7,512 $1,300 inc inc $8,812 Riverside Construction Inspector II $6,783 $11 $6,794 $1,411 $45 inc $3 $8,252 San Bernardino Construction Inspector II $5,912 $5,912 $880 inc inc $1 $10 $6,803 Temecula Public Works Inspector II $6,280 $10 $251 $6,542 $1,600 inc inc $8,142 Upland Senior Public Works Inspector $6,596 $297 $100 $6,993 $1,267 inc inc $8,260 Beaumont Public Works Inspector $7,687 $100 $769 $8,556 $1,675 inc inc $7 $10,238 Average $6,473 $6,752 $8,205
% +/-15.8%21.1%19.9%
Median $6,427 $6,810 $8,249
12 % +/-16.4%20.4%19.4%
75th Percenile $6,856 $7,265 $8,636
13 % +/-10.8%15.1%15.6%
Median Gain/Loss 4.0%-1.0%
73 Print Date: 1/26/2022 383
Item 18.

Ralph Andersen & Associates Data Effective June 2021
Beaumont
Public Works Inspector
Survey Agency Comparable Class
Banning Public Works Inspector
Cathedral City No Comparable Class
Colton Public Works and Utility Inspector
Corona Public Works Inspector II
Menifee Public Works Inspector II
Murrieta Public Works Inspector
Palm Springs Public Works Inspector
Redlands Construction Inspector II
Rialto Construction Inspector
Riverside Construction Inspector II
San Bernardino Construction Inspector II
Temecula Public Works Inspector II
Upland Senior Public Works Inspector
Beaumont Public Works Inspector
Average
% +/-
Median
12 % +/-
75th Percenile
13 % +/-
Retirement Benefits Leave Benefits
Emp. Ret.EE Cont
to ER Ret. Form.

Base +
Cash +
Ins. + Ret.

Hol Sick Admin Vac
Max
Total
Leave
$1,888 2@60 $9,440 11 8 13 32
$2,139 2.5@55 $10,107 12 8 13 33
$3,154 2.7@55 $10,408 8 21 29
$1,129 2.7@55 $10,152 10 9 13 32
$647 2@60 $8,892 9 23 32
$2,484 2@60 $12,056 10 21 31
$1,870 2@55 $10,447 11 8 17 35
$2,879 2.7@55 $11,691 12 10 23 44
$2,155 2.7@55 $10,407 8 8 13 29
$2,559 ($77)2@55 $9,286 11 8 17 35
$2,163 2@60 $10,305 8 23 31
$3,045 ($92)2.5@55 $11,212 11 8 15 34
$1,984 3@60 $12,222 9 8 17 34
$10,367 33.1

15.2%2.7%
$10,356 32.1

15.3%5.6%
$10,639 33.9

13.0%0.2%
-4.2%
74 Print Date: 1/26/2022 384
Item 18.

Ralph Andersen & Associates Data Effective June 2021
Beaumont
Public Works Manager - Drift Check 11 Cash Supplements Insurance Benefits Survey Agency Comparable Class Range
Max.Long.Uniform Educ.

Inc.

Def.

Comp.

Ret.

Pickup
Base +
Cash Health Dental Vision Life LTD
Base +
Cash +
Ins.

Banning Public Works Superintendent $9,282 $275 $9,557 $1,400 inc $21 $39 $11,016 Cathedral City No Comparable Class
Colton Public Works Superintendent $7,613 $7,613 $1,100 inc inc $8 $34 $8,756 Corona Public Works Program Manager $8,813 $167 $8,980 $1,564 inc inc $0 $60 $10,603 Menifee Public Works Manager $11,581 $11,581 $1,800 inc inc $17 $13,398 Murrieta Maintenance Manager $9,953 $150 $10,103 $1,563 $98 $40 $20 $68 $11,891 Palm Springs Street Maintenance Manager $8,929 $446 $9,375 $2,094 inc inc $11 $111 $11,591 Redlands No Comparable Class
Rialto Public Works Superintendent $9,499 $570 $712 $400 $11,181 $1,300 inc inc $12,481 Riverside Field Service Operations Manager $12,022 $75 $12,097 $1,482 $45 inc $69 $13,693 San Bernardino Operations & Maintenance Division Mgr $10,285 $10,285 $1,250 inc inc $7 $18 $11,560 Temecula Maintenance Manager $11,081 $10 $776 $11,867 $1,600 inc inc $13,467 Upland Operations Manager $11,356 $511 $795 $12,662 $1,184 inc inc $13,846 Beaumont Public Works Manager - Drift
Average $10,038 $10,482 $12,027
% +/-
Median $9,953 $10,285 $11,891
11 % +/-
75th Percenile $11,219 $11,724 $13,432
11 % +/-
Median Gain/Loss
75 Print Date: 1/26/2022 385
Item 18.

Ralph Andersen & Associates Data Effective June 2021
Beaumont
Public Works Manager - Drift Check
Survey Agency Comparable Class
Banning Public Works Superintendent
Cathedral City No Comparable Class
Colton Public Works Superintendent
Corona Public Works Program Manager
Menifee Public Works Manager
Murrieta Maintenance Manager
Palm Springs Street Maintenance Manager
Redlands No Comparable Class
Rialto Public Works Superintendent
Riverside Field Service Operations Manager
San Bernardino Operations & Maintenance Division Mgr
Temecula Maintenance Manager
Upland Operations Manager
Beaumont Public Works Manager - Drift
Average
% +/-
Median
11 % +/-
75th Percenile
11 % +/-
Retirement Benefits Leave Benefits
Emp. Ret.EE Cont
to ER Ret. Form.

Base +
Cash +
Ins. + Ret.

Hol Sick Admin Vac
Max
Total
Leave
$2,859 2@60 $13,875 11 8 13 32
$2,520 2.5@55 $11,275 11 8 13 32
$4,990 2.7@55 $15,593 8 9 23 40
$1,813 2.7@55 $15,210 10 9 5 13 37
$1,008 2@60 $12,898 9 5 23 37
$3,135 2@60 $14,726 10 4 21 35
$4,490 2.7@55 $16,972 10 10 10 23 53
$3,819 2.7@55 $17,513 8 8 3 15 34
$4,452 ($237)2@55 $15,775 11 8 7 17 42
$3,817 ($332)2@60 $16,951 8 5 24 37
$5,242 ($159)2.5@55 $18,929 11 8 4 15 38
$15,429 37.9
$15,593 37.0
$16,962 39.0
76 Print Date: 1/26/2022 386
Item 18.

Ralph Andersen & Associates Data Effective June 2021
Beaumont
Recreation Coordinator - Drift Check 10 Cash Supplements Insurance Benefits Survey Agency Comparable Class Range
Max.Long.Uniform Educ.

Inc.

Def.

Comp.

Ret.

Pickup
Base +
Cash Health Dental Vision Life LTD
Base +
Cash +
Ins.

Banning No Comparable Class
Cathedral City No Comparable Class
Colton Recreation Services Coordinator $4,568 $91 $228 $4,888 $1,100 inc inc $8 $21 $6,017 Corona Recreation Coordinator $5,066 $83 $5,149 $1,564 inc inc $0 $34 $6,747 Menifee Community Services Coordinator $5,704 $5,704 $1,800 inc inc $13 $7,516 Murrieta Recreation Coordinator $4,885 $100 $4,985 $1,563 $98 $40 $8 $33 $6,727 Palm Springs Program Coordinator $5,394 $270 $5,664 $2,106 inc inc $11 $20 $7,801 Redlands Program Specialist $5,114 $256 $5,370 $900 $127 $19 $6,416 Rialto Recreation Programmer $5,124 $307 $384 $600 $6,416 $1,300 inc inc $7,716 Riverside Assistant Recreation Coordinator $3,658 $3,658 $1,411 $45 inc $3 $5,117 San Bernardino Community Recreation Program Coordinator $3,416 $3,416 $880 inc inc $1 $6 $4,303 Temecula Community Services Coordinator II $5,833 $233 $6,066 $1,600 inc inc $7,666 Upland No Comparable Class
Beaumont Recreation Coordinator - Drift
Average $4,876 $5,132 $6,603
% +/-
Median $5,090 $5,260 $6,737
10 % +/-
75th Percenile $5,327 $5,694 $7,629
11 % +/-
Median Gain/Loss
77 Print Date: 1/26/2022 387
Item 18.

Ralph Andersen & Associates Data Effective June 2021
Beaumont
Recreation Coordinator - Drift Check
Survey Agency Comparable Class
Banning No Comparable Class
Cathedral City No Comparable Class
Colton Recreation Services Coordinator
Corona Recreation Coordinator
Menifee Community Services Coordinator
Murrieta Recreation Coordinator
Palm Springs Program Coordinator
Redlands Program Specialist
Rialto Recreation Programmer
Riverside Assistant Recreation Coordinator
San Bernardino Community Recreation Program Coordinator Temecula Community Services Coordinator II
Upland No Comparable Class
Beaumont Recreation Coordinator - Drift
Average
% +/-
Median
10 % +/-
75th Percenile
11 % +/-
Retirement Benefits Leave Benefits
Emp. Ret.EE Cont
to ER Ret. Form.

Base +
Cash +
Ins. + Ret.

Hol Sick Admin Vac
Max
Total
Leave
$1,512 2.5@55 $7,529 11 8 13 32
$2,868 2.7@55 $9,616 8 21 29
$893 2.7@55 $8,409 10 9 13 32
$495 2@60 $7,221 9 23 32
$1,894 2@60 $9,694 10 21 31
$1,333 2@55 $7,749 11 8 17 35
$2,422 2.7@55 $10,138 12 10 23 44
$1,162 2.7@55 $6,279 8 8 13 29
$1,479 ($45)2@55 $5,737 11 8 17 35
$2,009 2@60 $9,675 8 23 31
$8,205 33.0
$8,079 31.9
$9,660 34.5
78 Print Date: 1/26/2022 388
Item 18.

Ralph Andersen & Associates Data Effective June 2021
Beaumont
Recreation Specialist 12 Cash Supplements Insurance Benefits Survey Agency Comparable Class Range
Max.Long.Uniform Educ.

Inc.

Def.

Comp.

Ret.

Pickup
Base +
Cash Health Dental Vision Life LTD
Base +
Cash +
Ins.

Banning Recreation Leader $2,923 $2,923 $2,923
Cathedral City No Comparable Class
Colton Recreation Leader $2,574 $2,574 $2,574
Corona Library & Recreation Services Leader II $3,202 $3,202 $3,202 Menifee Recreation Leader $3,867 $3,867 $3,867
Murrieta Recreation Leader $2,740 $2,740 $2,740
Palm Springs Recreation Program Assistant $3,816 $191 $4,007 $2,106 inc inc $11 $14 $6,138 Redlands Program Assistant $2,586 $2,586 $2,586
Rialto Recreation Specialist $2,981 $2,981 $2,981
Riverside Recreation Leader $2,730 $2,730 $2,730
San Bernardino Recreation Leader $2,789 $2,789 $880 inc inc $1 $5 $3,675 Temecula Recreation Leader $3,389 $136 $3,525 $1,600 inc inc $5,125 Upland Recreation Leader $2,950 $2,950 $2,950
Beaumont Recreation Specialist $3,160 $316 $3,476 $1,675 inc inc $7 $5,158 Average $3,046 $3,073 $3,458
% +/-3.6%11.6%33.0%
Median $2,936 $2,936 $2,966
12 % +/-7.1%15.5%42.5%
75th Percenile $3,249 $3,283 $3,723
13 % +/--2.8%5.6%27.8%
Median Gain/Loss 8.4%27.0%
79 Print Date: 1/26/2022 389
Item 18.

Ralph Andersen & Associates Data Effective June 2021
Beaumont
Recreation Specialist
Survey Agency Comparable Class
Banning Recreation Leader
Cathedral City No Comparable Class
Colton Recreation Leader
Corona Library & Recreation Services Leader II
Menifee Recreation Leader
Murrieta Recreation Leader
Palm Springs Recreation Program Assistant
Redlands Program Assistant
Rialto Recreation Specialist
Riverside Recreation Leader
San Bernardino Recreation Leader
Temecula Recreation Leader
Upland Recreation Leader
Beaumont Recreation Specialist
Average
% +/-
Median
12 % +/-
75th Percenile
13 % +/-
Retirement Benefits Leave Benefits
Emp. Ret.EE Cont
to ER Ret. Form.

Base +
Cash +
Ins. + Ret.

Hol Sick Admin Vac
Max
Total
Leave
$2,923
$2,574
$3,202
$3,867
$2,740
$1,340 2@60 $7,478 10 21 31
$2,586
$2,981
$2,730
$1,207 ($36)2@55 $4,846 11 8 17 35
$1,167 2@60 $6,292 8 23 31
$2,950
$816 3@60 $5,973 9 8 17 34
$3,764 8.0

37.0%76.3%
$2,966

50.4%100.0%
$4,112 7.7

31.2%77.4%

7.9%
80 Print Date: 1/26/2022 390
Item 18.

Ralph Andersen & Associates Data Effective June 2021
Beaumont
Senior Accountant 9 Cash Supplements Insurance Benefits Survey Agency Comparable Class Range
Max.Long.Uniform Educ.

Inc.

Def.

Comp.

Ret.

Pickup
Base +
Cash Health Dental Vision Life LTD
Base +
Cash +
Ins.

Banning Accountant II $5,693 $5,693 $1,400 inc $21 inc $7,114 Cathedral City No Comparable Class
Colton Senior Accountant $6,813 $6,813 $1,100 inc inc $8 $31 $7,952 Corona Accounting Supervisor $7,703 $167 $7,870 $1,564 inc inc $0 $52 $9,486 Menifee No Comparable Class
Murrieta No Comparable Class
Palm Springs No Comparable Class
Redlands Senior Accountant $7,560 $72 $7,632 $913 $127 $19 $8,690 Rialto Senior Accountant $7,063 $424 $494 $400 $8,381 $1,300 inc inc $9,681 Riverside Senior Accountant $7,814 $75 $7,889 $1,482 $45 inc $45 $9,461 San Bernardino Accountant III $6,532 $6,532 $1,030 inc inc $1 $11 $7,574 Temecula Accountant II $8,656 $606 $9,262 $1,600 inc inc $10,862 Upland Senior Accountant $6,761 $304 $100 $7,165 $1,267 inc inc $8,432 Beaumont Senior Accountant $10,086 $10,086 $1,675 inc inc $7 $11,768 Average $7,177 $7,471 $8,806
% +/-28.8%25.9%25.2%
Median $7,063 $7,632 $8,690
9 % +/-30.0%24.3%26.2%
75th Percenile $7,703 $7,889 $9,486
10 % +/-23.6%21.8%19.4%
Median Gain/Loss -5.6%1.8%
81 Print Date: 1/26/2022 391
Item 18.

Ralph Andersen & Associates Data Effective June 2021
Beaumont
Senior Accountant
Survey Agency Comparable Class
Banning Accountant II
Cathedral City No Comparable Class
Colton Senior Accountant
Corona Accounting Supervisor
Menifee No Comparable Class
Murrieta No Comparable Class
Palm Springs No Comparable Class
Redlands Senior Accountant
Rialto Senior Accountant
Riverside Senior Accountant
San Bernardino Accountant III
Temecula Accountant II
Upland Senior Accountant
Beaumont Senior Accountant
Average
% +/-
Median
9 % +/-
75th Percenile
10 % +/-
Retirement Benefits Leave Benefits
Emp. Ret.EE Cont
to ER Ret. Form.

Base +
Cash +
Ins. + Ret.

Hol Sick Admin Vac
Max
Total
Leave
$1,754 2@60 $8,868 11 8 13 32
$2,255 2.5@55 $10,207 11 8 7 13 39
$4,361 2.7@55 $13,847 8 9 23 40
$1,970 2@55 $10,661 11 8 10 17 45
$3,339 2.7@55 $13,020 12 10 10 23 54
$2,483 2.7@55 $11,943 8 8 3 15 34
$2,828 ($150)2@55 $10,252 11 8 3 17 39
$2,981 ($260)2@60 $13,584 8 5 24 37
$3,121 ($95)2.5@55 $11,458 11 8 15 34
$2,603 3@60 $14,372 9 8 17 34
$11,538 39.4

19.7%-15.8%
$11,458 38.5

20.3%-13.3%
$13,020 40.3

9.4%-18.6%
-5.9%
82 Print Date: 1/26/2022 392
Item 18.

Ralph Andersen & Associates Data Effective June 2021
Beaumont
Special Projects/Press Information Officer 7 Cash Supplements Insurance Benefits Survey Agency Comparable Class Range
Max.Long.Uniform Educ.

Inc.

Def.

Comp.

Ret.

Pickup
Base +
Cash Health Dental Vision Life LTD
Base +
Cash +
Ins.

Banning Public Information Officer $7,110 $275 $7,385 $1,400 inc $21 $39 $8,845 Cathedral City Communications/Events Manager $9,812 $1,472 $491 $100 $687 $12,561 $2,300 inc inc $42 $24 $14,927 Colton No Comparable Class
Corona No Comparable Class
Menifee Public Information Officer $11,072 $11,072 $1,800 inc inc $17 $12,889 Murrieta Public Information Officer $10,338 $217 $10,555 $1,563 $98 $40 $21 $70 $12,346 Palm Springs Director of Communications $9,702 $485 $10,187 $2,094 inc inc $11 $120 $12,412 Redlands Public Information Officer $9,867 $197 $10,064 $900 $127 $19 $11,110 Rialto No Comparable Class
Riverside Communications Officer $8,670 $75 $8,745 $1,482 $45 inc $50 $10,322 San Bernardino No Comparable Class
Temecula No Comparable Class
Upland No Comparable Class
Beaumont Special Projects/Press Information Officer $8,280 $8,280 $1,675 inc inc $7 $9,962 Average $9,510 $10,081 $11,836
% +/--14.9%-21.8%-18.8%
Median $9,812 $10,187 $12,346
7 % +/--18.5%-23.0%-23.9%
75th Percenile $10,103 $10,814 $12,651
7 % +/--22.0%-30.6%-27.0%
Median Gain/Loss -4.5%-0.9%
83 Print Date: 1/26/2022 393
Item 18.

Ralph Andersen & Associates Data Effective June 2021
Beaumont
Special Projects/Press Information Officer
Survey Agency Comparable Class
Banning Public Information Officer
Cathedral City Communications/Events Manager
Colton No Comparable Class
Corona No Comparable Class
Menifee Public Information Officer
Murrieta Public Information Officer
Palm Springs Director of Communications
Redlands Public Information Officer
Rialto No Comparable Class
Riverside Communications Officer
San Bernardino No Comparable Class
Temecula No Comparable Class
Upland No Comparable Class
Beaumont Special Projects/Press Information Officer
Average
% +/-
Median
7 % +/-
75th Percenile
7 % +/-
Retirement Benefits Leave Benefits
Emp. Ret.EE Cont
to ER Ret. Form.

Base +
Cash +
Ins. + Ret.

Hol Sick Admin Vac
Max
Total
Leave
$2,190 2@60 $11,035 10 8 13 31
$903 ($883)2@60 $14,947 12 8 18 38
$1,733 2.7@55 $14,622 10 9 5 13 37
$1,047 2@60 $13,392 9 7 23 39
$3,406 2@60 $15,818 10 4 21 35
$2,572 2@55 $13,682 9 8 10 17 44
$2,754 2.7@55 $13,076 8 8 3 15 34
$2,137 3@60 $12,099 9 8 17 34
$13,796 36.7
-14.0%-8.1%
$13,682 36.8
-13.1%-8.1%
$14,785 38.4
-22.2%-12.8%

10.8%
84 Print Date: 1/26/2022 394
Item 18.

Ralph Andersen & Associates Data Effective June 2021
Beaumont
Street Maintenance Supervisor 12 Cash Supplements Insurance Benefits Survey Agency Comparable Class Range
Max.Long.Uniform Educ.

Inc.

Def.

Comp.

Ret.

Pickup
Base +
Cash Health Dental Vision Life LTD
Base +
Cash +
Ins.

Banning No Comparable Class
Cathedral City Public Work Supervisor $7,871 $1,181 $394 $100 $551 $10,096 $2,300 inc inc $34 $19 $12,449 Colton Collection System Maintenance Supervisor $5,118 $5,118 $1,100 inc inc $8 $23 $6,249 Corona Public Works Program Supervisor $6,632 $167 $6,799 $1,564 inc inc $0 $45 $8,407 Menifee Public Works Maintenance Supervisor $7,927 $7,927 $1,800 inc inc $13 $9,740 Murrieta Maintenance Supervisor $7,218 $150 $7,368 $1,563 $98 $40 $14 $49 $9,132 Palm Springs Maintenance Supervisor $8,084 $404 $8,488 $2,094 inc inc $11 $100 $10,693 Redlands Field Services Coordinator $6,776 $72 $6,848 $913 $127 $19 $7,906 Rialto Public Works Supervisor $7,421 $445 $557 $400 $8,823 $1,300 inc inc $10,123 Riverside Street Maintenance Supervisor $7,592 $75 $7,667 $1,482 $45 inc $44 $9,238 San Bernardino Maintenance Supervisor $6,532 $6,532 $1,030 inc inc $1 $11 $7,574 Temecula Maintenance Supervisor $9,095 $10 $637 $9,742 $1,600 inc inc $11,342 Upland Maintenance Supervisor $6,596 $297 $462 $7,355 $1,184 inc inc $8,539 Beaumont Street Maintenance Supervisor $6,467 $6,467 $1,675 inc inc $7 $8,149 Average $7,239 $7,730 $9,283
% +/--11.9%-19.5%-13.9%
Median $7,320 $7,518 $9,185
12 % +/--13.2%-16.2%-12.7%
75th Percenile $7,885 $8,572 $10,265
13 % +/--21.9%-32.5%-26.0%
Median Gain/Loss -3.1%3.5%
85 Print Date: 1/26/2022 395
Item 18.

Ralph Andersen & Associates Data Effective June 2021
Beaumont
Street Maintenance Supervisor
Survey Agency Comparable Class
Banning No Comparable Class
Cathedral City Public Work Supervisor
Colton Collection System Maintenance Supervisor
Corona Public Works Program Supervisor
Menifee Public Works Maintenance Supervisor
Murrieta Maintenance Supervisor
Palm Springs Maintenance Supervisor
Redlands Field Services Coordinator
Rialto Public Works Supervisor
Riverside Street Maintenance Supervisor
San Bernardino Maintenance Supervisor
Temecula Maintenance Supervisor
Upland Maintenance Supervisor
Beaumont Street Maintenance Supervisor
Average
% +/-
Median
12 % +/-
75th Percenile
13 % +/-
Retirement Benefits Leave Benefits
Emp. Ret.EE Cont
to ER Ret. Form.

Base +
Cash +
Ins. + Ret.

Hol Sick Admin Vac
Max
Total
Leave
$724 ($708)2@60 $12,465 12 8 18 38
$1,694 2.5@55 $7,943 11 8 7 13 39
$3,755 2.7@55 $12,162 8 9 23 40
$1,241 2.7@55 $10,981 10 9 4 13 36
$731 2@60 $9,862 9 5 23 37
$2,838 2@60 $13,531 10 4 21 35
$1,766 2@55 $9,672 11 8 10 17 45
$3,508 2.7@55 $13,631 10 10 10 23 53
$2,412 2.7@55 $11,650 8 8 14 30
$2,828 ($150)2@55 $10,252 11 8 3 17 39
$3,133 ($273)2@60 $14,202 8 5 24 37
$3,045 ($92)2.5@55 $11,491 11 8 4 15 38
$1,669 3@60 $9,818 9 8 17 34
$11,487 38.8
-17.0%-14.3%
$11,570 37.8
-17.8%-11.3%
$12,732 39.3
-29.7%-15.7%
-5.1%
86 Print Date: 1/26/2022 396
Item 18.

Ralph Andersen & Associates Data Effective June 2021
Beaumont
Street Maintenance Worker 13 Cash Supplements Insurance Benefits Survey Agency Comparable Class Range
Max.Long.Uniform Educ.

Inc.

Def.

Comp.

Ret.

Pickup
Base +
Cash Health Dental Vision Life LTD
Base +
Cash +
Ins.

Banning Maintenance Worker $4,029 $4,029 $1,400 inc $21 inc $5,450 Cathedral City Street Maintenance Worker II $5,383 $269 $100 $5,752 $2,441 inc inc $13 $8,206 Colton Maintenance Worker II $4,000 $80 $200 $4,280 $1,100 inc inc $8 $18 $5,407 Corona Senior Street Maintenance Worker $4,941 $83 $5,024 $1,564 inc inc $0 $34 $6,622 Menifee Street Maintenance Worker II $5,086 $5,086 $1,800 inc inc $13 $6,898 Murrieta Maintenance Worker II $4,537 $100 $4,637 $1,563 $98 $40 $8 $31 $6,376 Palm Springs Street/Traffic Maintenance Worker $4,887 $244 $5,131 $2,106 inc inc $11 $18 $7,266 Redlands Maintenance Worker II $3,988 $199 $4,187 $900 $127 $19 $5,234 Rialto Field Service Worker $4,103 $246 $308 $600 $5,257 $1,300 inc inc $6,557 Riverside Street Maintenance Worker $4,821 $7 $4,828 $1,411 $45 inc $3 $6,287 San Bernardino Maintenance Worker II $3,967 $3,967 $880 inc inc $1 $7 $4,855 Temecula Maintenance Worker II - Streets/Parks $5,283 $211 $5,494 $1,600 inc inc $7,094 Upland Maintenance Worker $4,335 $195 $100 $4,630 $1,267 inc inc $5,897 Beaumont Street Maintenance Worker $5,576 $558 $6,134 $1,675 inc inc $7 $7,816 Average $4,566 $4,793 $6,319
% +/-18.1%21.9%19.1%
Median $4,537 $4,828 $6,376
13 % +/-18.6%21.3%18.4%
75th Percenile $4,941 $5,131 $6,898
13 % +/-11.4%16.3%11.7%
Median Gain/Loss 2.7%-2.9%
87 Print Date: 1/26/2022 397
Item 18.

Ralph Andersen & Associates Data Effective June 2021
Beaumont
Street Maintenance Worker
Survey Agency Comparable Class
Banning Maintenance Worker
Cathedral City Street Maintenance Worker II
Colton Maintenance Worker II
Corona Senior Street Maintenance Worker
Menifee Street Maintenance Worker II
Murrieta Maintenance Worker II
Palm Springs Street/Traffic Maintenance Worker
Redlands Maintenance Worker II
Rialto Field Service Worker
Riverside Street Maintenance Worker
San Bernardino Maintenance Worker II
Temecula Maintenance Worker II - Streets/Parks
Upland Maintenance Worker
Beaumont Street Maintenance Worker
Average
% +/-
Median
13 % +/-
75th Percenile
13 % +/-
Retirement Benefits Leave Benefits
Emp. Ret.EE Cont
to ER Ret. Form.

Base +
Cash +
Ins. + Ret.

Hol Sick Admin Vac
Max
Total
Leave
$1,241 2@60 $6,691 11 8 13 32
$495 2@60 $8,701 12 8 18 38
$1,324 2.5@55 $6,730 11 8 13 32
$2,797 2.7@55 $9,419 8 21 29
$796 2.7@55 $7,694 10 9 13 32
$459 2@60 $6,836 9 23 32
$1,716 2@60 $8,982 10 21 31
$1,039 2@55 $6,273 11 8 17 35
$1,940 2.7@55 $8,496 12 10 23 44
$1,532 2.7@55 $7,818 8 8 13 29
$1,717 ($52)2@55 $6,520 11 8 17 35
$1,820 2@60 $8,914 8 23 31
$2,001 ($61)2.5@55 $7,837 11 8 15 34
$1,439 3@60 $9,255 9 8 17 34
$7,763 33.4

16.1%1.8%
$7,818 32.2

15.5%5.4%
$8,701 35.2

6.0%-3.4%
-2.9%
88 Print Date: 1/26/2022 398
Item 18.

Ralph Andersen & Associates Data Effective June 2021
Beaumont
Support Services Specialist II 12 Cash Supplements Insurance Benefits Survey Agency Comparable Class Range
Max.Long.Uniform Educ.

Inc.

Def.

Comp.

Ret.

Pickup
Base +
Cash Health Dental Vision Life LTD
Base +
Cash +
Ins.

Banning Police Assistant II $4,339 $4,339 $1,400 inc $21 inc $5,760 Cathedral City Property & Evidence Technician II $6,704 $335 $75 $100 $7,214 $2,441 inc inc $16 $9,671 Colton Police Services Clerk II $3,524 $70 $176 $3,771 $1,100 inc inc $8 $16 $4,895 Corona Property Administrator $3,870 $83 $3,953 $1,564 inc inc $0 $26 $5,543 Menifee Crime Scene/Property & Evidence Spec $6,860 $6,860 $1,800 inc inc $13 $8,672 Murrieta Property & Evidence Technician $4,442 $50 $100 $4,592 $1,563 $98 $40 $8 $30 $6,331 Palm Springs Property Technician $5,664 $283 $5,947 $2,106 inc inc $11 $21 $8,085 Redlands Community Service Officer II $4,759 $142 $72 $4,972 $900 $127 $19 $6,018 Rialto Property & Evidence Technician $5,082 $305 $381 $600 $6,368 $1,300 inc inc $7,668 Riverside Police Property Specialist $4,596 $26 $4,622 $1,411 $45 inc $3 $6,080 San Bernardino Property & Evidence Technician II $4,843 $4,843 $880 inc inc $1 $8 $5,732 Temecula No Comparable Class
Upland Police Records Specialist II $4,026 $181 $25 $100 $4,332 $1,267 inc inc $5,599 Beaumont Support Services Specialist II $4,465 $100 $447 $5,012 $1,500 inc inc $7 $6,519 Average $4,892 $5,151 $6,671
% +/--9.6%-2.8%-2.3%
Median $4,678 $4,732 $6,049
12 % +/--4.8%5.6%7.2%
75th Percenile $5,228 $6,052 $7,772
12 % +/--17.1%-20.8%-19.2%
Median Gain/Loss 10.3%1.6%
89 Print Date: 1/26/2022 399
Item 18.

Ralph Andersen & Associates Data Effective June 2021
Beaumont
Support Services Specialist II
Survey Agency Comparable Class
Banning Police Assistant II
Cathedral City Property & Evidence Technician II
Colton Police Services Clerk II
Corona Property Administrator
Menifee Crime Scene/Property & Evidence Spec
Murrieta Property & Evidence Technician
Palm Springs Property Technician
Redlands Community Service Officer II
Rialto Property & Evidence Technician
Riverside Police Property Specialist
San Bernardino Property & Evidence Technician II
Temecula No Comparable Class
Upland Police Records Specialist II
Beaumont Support Services Specialist II
Average
% +/-
Median
12 % +/-
75th Percenile
12 % +/-
Retirement Benefits Leave Benefits
Emp. Ret.EE Cont
to ER Ret. Form.

Base +
Cash +
Ins. + Ret.

Hol Sick Admin Vac
Max
Total
Leave
$1,336 2@60 $7,096 11 8 13 32
$617 2@60 $10,288 12 8 18 38
$1,166 2.5@55 $6,062 11 8 13 32
$2,191 2.7@55 $7,734 8 21 29
$1,074 2.7@55 $9,746 10 9 13 32
$450 2@60 $6,780 9 23 32
$1,988 2@60 $10,074 10 21 31
$1,240 2@55 $7,259 9 8 17 34
$2,402 2.7@55 $10,070 11 10 23 44
$1,460 2.7@55 $7,541 8 8 13 29
$2,097 ($63)2@55 $7,766 11 8 17 35
$1,858 ($56)2.5@55 $7,401 11 8 15 34
$1,153 3@60 $7,671 9 8 17 34
$8,151 33.4
-6.3%1.7%
$7,637 32.2

0.4%5.2%
$9,827 34.0
-28.1%-0.1%
-6.8%
90 Print Date: 1/26/2022 400
Item 18.

Ralph Andersen & Associates Data Effective June 2021
Beaumont
Support Services Supervisor 7 Cash Supplements Insurance Benefits Survey Agency Comparable Class Range
Max.Long.Uniform Educ.

Inc.

Def.

Comp.

Ret.

Pickup
Base +
Cash Health Dental Vision Life LTD
Base +
Cash +
Ins.

Banning No Comparable Class
Cathedral City No Comparable Class
Colton Police Support Services Manager $7,322 $7,322 $1,100 inc inc $8 $33 $8,464 Corona Support Services Manager $9,545 $167 $153 $9,865 $1,564 inc inc $0 $65 $11,494 Menifee Police Support Services Manager $11,581 $11,581 $1,800 inc inc $17 $13,398 Murrieta Public Safety Radio Systems Administrator $6,787 $50 $150 $6,987 $1,563 $98 $40 $14 $46 $8,747 Palm Springs No Comparable Class
Redlands Police Operations Manager $9,626 $193 $9,819 $900 $127 $19 $10,865 Rialto Emergency Dispatch Supervisor $5,866 $352 $67 $440 $750 $7,475 $1,300 inc inc $8,775 Riverside No Comparable Class
San Bernardino No Comparable Class
Temecula No Comparable Class
Upland Police Dispatch Supervisor $6,435 $290 $25 $450 $7,200 $1,184 inc inc $8,384 Beaumont Support Services Supervisor $7,316 $100 $732 $8,148 $1,500 inc inc $7 $9,655 Average $8,166 $8,607 $10,018
% +/--11.6%-5.6%-3.8%
Median $7,322 $7,475 $8,775
7 % +/--0.1%8.3%9.1%
75th Percenile $9,586 $9,842 $11,179
9 % +/--31.0%-20.8%-15.8%
Median Gain/Loss 8.3%0.9%
91 Print Date: 1/26/2022 401
Item 18.

Ralph Andersen & Associates Data Effective June 2021
Beaumont
Support Services Supervisor
Survey Agency Comparable Class
Banning No Comparable Class
Cathedral City No Comparable Class
Colton Police Support Services Manager
Corona Support Services Manager
Menifee Police Support Services Manager
Murrieta Public Safety Radio Systems Administrator
Palm Springs No Comparable Class
Redlands Police Operations Manager
Rialto Emergency Dispatch Supervisor
Riverside No Comparable Class
San Bernardino No Comparable Class
Temecula No Comparable Class
Upland Police Dispatch Supervisor
Beaumont Support Services Supervisor
Average
% +/-
Median
7 % +/-
75th Percenile
9 % +/-
Retirement Benefits Leave Benefits
Emp. Ret.EE Cont
to ER Ret. Form.

Base +
Cash +
Ins. + Ret.

Beaumont City CouncilFebruary 15, 2022

Beaumont City Council
February 15, 2022