Cities Index.
Agenda packet

Beaumont City Council
October 18, 2022

Document
Agenda packet
Meeting
October 18, 2022
Body
Beaumont City Council
Pages
2,513
Original file
5.7 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on portal.laserfiche.com. That file is the official record.

Good morning,

We anticipate the project will be heard at the Planning Commission on June 28 th.

217

CHRISTINA TAYLOR
Deputy City Manager

City of Beaumont
550 E. 6th Street, Beaumont, Ca 92223
Desk (951) 572-3212
BeaumontCa.gov
Facebook | Twitter | Instagram | YouTube

#ACITYELEVATED

From: Sheila M. Sannadan
Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2022 11:02 AM
To: Christina Taylor ; Carole Kendrick
Subject: Beaumont Summit Specific Plan Project - Hearings

Good Morning Ms. Taylor and Ms. Kendrick,

I see that it is mentioned on the City’s website that the Beaumont Summit Station Project is tentatively scheduled for a City Planning Commission hearing on June 28, 2022. https://www.beaumontca.gov/CivicAlerts.aspx?AID=849

Could you please tell me whether this Project is indeed scheduled for a public hearing on June 28, 2022? If not, what is the new tentative, or scheduled, hearing date for this Project?

Thank you for your assistance.

Regards,
Sheila

Sheila Sannadan
Legal Assistant
Adams Broadwell Joseph & Cardozo
601 Gateway Boulevard, Suite 1000
South San Francisco, CA 94080
Phone (650) 589-1660
Fax (650) 589-5062
[email protected]

218
Christina Taylor
From:Tiana Lee
Sent:Monday, July 4, 2022 10:40 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:Latest warehouse proposal
This is fo inform you that I vehemently oppose the latest Beaumont warehouse project. I am a Banning resident and feel bombarded with warehouse proposals from every direction. What the hell! Countless people will be feeling the adverse impact surrounded by noise, traffic, pollution. This has to stop!! I feel like a frog in a vat of water that is slowly heating up to the fatal end result.

Sent from my iPad

219
Christina Taylor
From:Gregory White
Sent:Monday, July 4, 2022 7:28 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:Against the Summit Project
Good evening, as a citizen of Beaumont for the past 17 years I must add my voice of opposition to the Summit Project travesty. These builders are here and then gone leaving behind the consequences of the monstrosities they build. Look around you as health-related issues are starting to appear in other cities that have allowed these projects to commence. If you were to poll most citizens in Beaumont I'm sure you would find a majority against this project. Please send to City Council with a NO vote for this project. Thank you.

220
Christina Taylor
From:Howard Katz
Sent:Saturday, July 2, 2022 11:42 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:Beaumont Warehouses
No more warehouses in the Beaumont/Banning area.

Howard Katz 909-227-0202

221
Christina Taylor
From:Debbie Avakian
Sent:Saturday, July 2, 2022 2:54 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:Re: Beaumont Summit Station - Public Hearing Notice Attachments:Summit Station Legal Ad 6.30.22 Final.pdf
Thank You, if all these warehouses are built this whole area will be a cess pool and I’m sure from just talking to people randomly most of this areas tax base will be moving out of state. They should be looking at shopping along cherry valley blvd. we can‘t even get to shopping in Beaumont with all the traffic…. Decent shopping not warehouses Sent from my iPhone

On Jul 1, 2022, at 1:41 PM, Christina Taylor wrote:

Good afternoon,

You are receiving this email because you have requested project updates for the proposed Summit Station project in the City of Beaumont. Attached is the Public Hearing notice for consideration of this project by the City Council on July 19, 2022. The Planning Commission heard the item on June 28, 2022, and in a 4-1 vote, forwarded a recommendation of denial of the project to City Council.

All project information available to date can be found here https://www.beaumontca.gov/1239/Beaumont-Summit-Station .

CHRISTINA TAYLOR
Deputy City Manager

City of Beaumont
550 E. 6th Street, Beaumont, Ca 92223
Desk (951) 572-3212
BeaumontCa.gov
Facebook | Twitter | Instagram | YouTube

222

#ACITYELEVATED

223
Christina Taylor
From:Lisa Lucchesi
Sent:Saturday, July 2, 2022 11:59 AM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:BEAUMONT SUMMIT STATION
To all it may concern on the Beaumont City Council,

This is the same letter that I sent to the Planning Commission, so I am sure it sounds familiar. Those in my area have not changed our minds. We already have terrible air in the pass, adding all of the diesel trucks will make it worse that we already are dealing with,
We (myself, husband and neighbors of Solera) are vehemently against this Summit Station Project. We campaigned furiously against the warehouses (No Way Gateway) currently being constructed and it all fell on deaf ears, or stuffed pockets.

Until the County of Riverside, Caltrans and the City of Beaumont can fix the infrastructure needed to even deal with the city's population boom, building this project would be terrible for the homeowners, traffic on Brookside and Cherry Valley Blvd, not to mention the off and on ramps of the 10 freeway. It already gets backed up, just with parents heading to and from schools to pick up their children. I am just waiting for the current warehouses to open and see how many accidents happen when a semi pulls out in front of cars going 45-55mph or turns in front of someone. We do not need another warehouse/eyesore dotting our nice open landscape. The jobs that these provide are not high paying and with all of the other jobs available right now, this project is not needed.

If you are going to build a project, forget the warehouses and get more entertainment, restaurants, shopping and infrastructure.

I know we have a severe drought in California and rolling blackouts during the summer, so why are we using 10,000 gallons for each water truck to spray the dirt to grade pads for these behemoths? The amount of trucks and water needed for these projects would be enough water for several homes already here. Also, all of the electricity to keep these giant buildings air conditioned and running 24/7. It's okay for business to use our precious water and power, but not current residents? And the pollution of all of those diesel trucks pulling in and out! Please think about the people in Beaumont, Cherry Valley and Calimesa that moved here for a nice town and open spaces that are now fighting gridlock and pollution.

No one that I have spoken to is for this project, and every time I drive by the Gateway Project, I get angry. Please don't let this happen to Beaumont.

Thank you,

Lisa and Anthony Lucchesi
Solera Resident

224
Christina Taylor
From:Sonny Lee
Sent:Friday, July 1, 2022 4:26 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:RE: Beaumont Summit Station - Public Hearing Notice Hi Christina,

Thank you for your information.

Sonny.

From: Christina Taylor [ mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, July 1, 2022 3:23 PM
To: Sonny Lee
Subject: RE: Beaumont Summit Station - Public Hearing Notice

Hi Sonny,

The City Council will be making a decision on the project on July 19 th. It is up to the City Council whether or not they approve or deny the project. Planning Commission only forwards a recommendation.

CHRISTINA TAYLOR
Deputy City Manager

City of Beaumont
550 E. 6th Street, Beaumont, Ca 92223
Desk (951) 572-3212
BeaumontCa.gov
Facebook | Twitter | Instagram | YouTube

The linked image cannot be displayed. The file may have been moved, renamed, or deleted. Verify that the link points to the correct file and location.

#ACITYELEVATED

From: Sonny Lee
Sent: Friday, July 01, 2022 3:21 PM
To: Christina Taylor
Subject: RE: Beaumont Summit Station - Public Hearing Notice

225
Hi Christina,

Will the Summit Station project be denied on 7/19/2022? Thank you.

Have a blessed day.

Sonny.

From: Christina Taylor [ mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, July 1, 2022 1:42 PM
To: Christina Taylor
Subject: Beaumont Summit Station - Public Hearing Notice

Good afternoon,

You are receiving this email because you have requested project updates for the proposed Summit Station project in the City of Beaumont. Attached is the Public Hearing notice for consideration of this project by the City Council on July 19, 2022. The Planning Commission heard the item on June 28, 2022, and in a 4-1 vote, forwarded a recommendation of denial of the project to City Council.

All project information available to date can be found here https://www.beaumontca.gov/1239/Beaumont- Summit-Station .

CHRISTINA TAYLOR
Deputy City Manager

City of Beaumont
550 E. 6th Street, Beaumont, Ca 92223
Desk (951) 572-3212
BeaumontCa.gov
Facebook | Twitter | Instagram | YouTube

The linked image cannot be displayed. The file may have been moved, renamed, or deleted. Verify that the link points to the correct file and location.

#ACITYELEVATED

226
Christina Taylor
From:Malou Reyes
Sent:Friday, July 1, 2022 3:49 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:Re: Beaumont Summit Station - Public Hearing Notice Thank you for the update, Ms. Taylor.

Sincerely,
Malou

On Fri, Jul 1, 2022 at 1:41 PM Christina Taylor wrote:

Good afternoon,

You are receiving this email because you have requested project updates for the proposed Summit Station project in the City of Beaumont. Attached is the Public Hearing notice for consideration of this project by the City Council on July 19, 2022. The Planning Commission heard the item on June 28, 2022, and in a 4-1 vote, forwarded a recommendation of denial of the project to City Council.

All project information available to date can be found here https://www.beaumontca.gov/1239/Beaumont- Summit-Station .

CHRISTINA TAYLOR
Deputy City Manager

City of Beaumont
550 E. 6th Street, Beaumont, Ca 92223
Desk (951) 572-3212
BeaumontCa.gov
Facebook | Twitter | Instagram | YouTube

227

#ACITYELEVATED

228
Christina Taylor
From:Sonny Lee
Sent:Friday, July 1, 2022 3:21 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:RE: Beaumont Summit Station - Public Hearing Notice Hi Christina,

Will the Summit Station project be denied on 7/19/2022? Thank you.

Have a blessed day.

Sonny.

From: Christina Taylor [ mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, July 1, 2022 1:42 PM
To: Christina Taylor
Subject: Beaumont Summit Station - Public Hearing Notice

Good afternoon,

You are receiving this email because you have requested project updates for the proposed Summit Station project in the City of Beaumont. Attached is the Public Hearing notice for consideration of this project by the City Council on July 19, 2022. The Planning Commission heard the item on June 28, 2022, and in a 4-1 vote, forwarded a recommendation of denial of the project to City Council.

All project information available to date can be found here https://www.beaumontca.gov/1239/Beaumont- Summit-Station .

CHRISTINA TAYLOR
Deputy City Manager

City of Beaumont
550 E. 6th Street, Beaumont, Ca 92223
Desk (951) 572-3212
BeaumontCa.gov
Facebook | Twitter | Instagram | YouTube

229
The linked image cannot be displayed. The file may have been moved, renamed, or deleted. Verify that the link points to the correct file and location.

#ACITYELEVATED

230
Christina Taylor
From:Julie
Sent:Friday, July 1, 2022 2:37 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:Re: Beaumont Summit Station - Public Hearing Notice Attachments:image001.png; Summit Station Legal Ad 6.30.22 Final.pdf Thank you for these updates!
Sent from my iPhone

On Jul 1, 2022, at 1:41 PM, Christina Taylor wrote:

Good afternoon,

You are receiving this email because you have requested project updates for the proposed Summit Station project in the City of Beaumont. Attached is the Public Hearing notice for consideration of this project by the City Council on July 19, 2022. The Planning Commission heard the item on June 28, 2022, and in a 4-1 vote, forwarded a recommendation of denial of the project to City Council.

All project information available to date can be found here https://www.beaumontca.gov/1239/Beaumont-Summit-Station .

CHRISTINA TAYLOR
Deputy City Manager

City of Beaumont
550 E. 6th Street, Beaumont, Ca 92223
Desk (951) 572-3212
BeaumontCa.gov
Facebook | Twitter | Instagram | YouTube

#ACITYELEVATED

231
Christina Taylor
From:[email protected]
Sent:Friday, July 1, 2022 2:28 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:Summit Station warehouse
Dear City Council members,
We ask all of you to vote NO on the Summit Station warehouse project.

We do not want the deadly air pollution or the thundering trucks rolling through residential neighborhoods close to schools and homes.

We are already fighting a warehouse behind Albertsons which would spill hundreds of trucks onto Highland Springs causing gridlock and cutting off emergency services to the south side of the city.

There is no point in having a general plan if its zoning is changed from residential to industrial to accommodate a monstrous building with all its attendant problems, just for a short-term monetary gain.

Please consider the residents and their health and well-being, NOT the developers who just want to make $millions and move on.

Thank you, Geoff & Sue Wilson. (12-year Beaumont residents)

232
Christina Taylor
From:Jennifer Hastings
Sent:Friday, July 1, 2022 2:06 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:Re: Beaumont Summit Station - Public Hearing Notice 4-1 that is awesome!! Thank you so much for this information and working to keep and preserve our beautiful valley!

On Fri, Jul 1, 2022 at 1:41 PM Christina Taylor wrote:

Good afternoon,

You are receiving this email because you have requested project updates for the proposed Summit Station project in the City of Beaumont. Attached is the Public Hearing notice for consideration of this project by the City Council on July 19, 2022. The Planning Commission heard the item on June 28, 2022, and in a 4-1 vote, forwarded a recommendation of denial of the project to City Council.

All project information available to date can be found here https://www.beaumontca.gov/1239/Beaumont- Summit-Station .

CHRISTINA TAYLOR
Deputy City Manager

City of Beaumont
550 E. 6th Street, Beaumont, Ca 92223
Desk (951) 572-3212
BeaumontCa.gov
Facebook | Twitter | Instagram | YouTube

233

#ACITYELEVATED

234
Christina Taylor
From:Ron Roy
Sent:Thursday, June 30, 2022 4:54 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:Re: June 28 2022 Planning Commission Meeting
Many thanks Christina and have a very enjoyable 4th of July!

Ron Roy.

On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 12:01 PM Christina Taylor wrote:

Hi Ron,

Thanks for calling in to the meeting the other night with your comments. I just wanted to confirm for you that your written comments received via email will be included for City Council. The meeting will be held on July 19th. We will be sending notices out as well.

CHRISTINA TAYLOR
Deputy City Manager

City of Beaumont
550 E. 6th Street, Beaumont, Ca 92223
Desk (951) 572-3212
BeaumontCa.gov
Facebook | Twitter | Instagram | YouTube

235

#ACITYELEVATED

From: Ron Roy
Sent: Monday, June 27, 2022 5:03 PM
To: Christina Taylor
Subject: June 28 2022 Planning Commission Meeting

Hello Christina:

Attached please find comment letters and other attachments that relate to the June 28th Planning Commission hearing on Beaumont Summit Station Specific Plan Amendment.

Please include these attachments to the official record of Planning Commissions hearing on this matter.

Please confirm:

I also expect to send some more documents tomorrow (June 28 2022). Pleas let me know the deadline for tomorrow.

Thank you
Ron Roy

236
Christina Taylor
From:Diana Trejo
Sent:Wednesday, June 29, 2022 8:43 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:Summit Station Project
To whom It May Concern,

We have been living here in Beaumont for the last 3 years. It may not be long enough as other residents here but I can feel their frustration. The reason we moved out here was because it was a beautiful Scenery and its tranquility. Also the commute was not bad at all for us. When we have seen the other warehouse being built on Cherry Valley it have taken away that beautiful view of the Mountain. The congestion has gotten even worse with more homes being built and now with this warehouse it will get even worse. The people in charge of these projects should of consider the roads and freeway entrance of being a huge issue. This is a huge problem and disappointment and I really hope this project gets cancelled. One more thing Beaumont name came from Beautiful Mountain and these warehouses are taking that away from our city.

237
Christina Taylor
From:Sheila M. Sannadan
Sent:Wednesday, June 29, 2022 4:03 PM
To:Christina Taylor; Carole Kendrick
Subject:RE: Beaumont Summit Specific Plan Project - Hearings Good Afternoon,

Is there an anticipated release date of the FEIR for the Beaumont Summit Specific Plan Project and any hearings scheduled for this project at this time?

Thank you.

Regards,
Sheila

Sheila Sannadan
Legal Assistant
Adams Broadwell Joseph & Cardozo
601 Gateway Boulevard, Suite 1000
South San Francisco, CA 94080
Phone (650) 589-1660
Fax (650) 589-5062
[email protected]

From: Christina Taylor
Sent: Monday, June 13, 2022 2:55 PM
To: Sheila M. Sannadan ; Carole Kendrick
Subject: RE: Beaumont Summit Specific Plan Project - Hearings

Good afternoon,

The Summit Station project is set for public hearing at the Planning Commission on June 28 th at 6pm. The meeting will be held in person and streamed on You Tube. The legal ad is attached and will be published in the newspaper and mailed out as required.

CHRISTINA TAYLOR
Deputy City Manager

City of Beaumont
550 E. 6th Street, Beaumont, Ca 92223
Desk (951) 572-3212
BeaumontCa.gov
Facebook | Twitter | Instagram | YouTube

238

#ACITYELEVATED

From: Sheila M. Sannadan
Sent: Monday, June 13, 2022 2:11 PM
To: Christina Taylor ; Carole Kendrick
Subject: RE: Beaumont Summit Specific Plan Project - Hearings

Good Afternoon Ms. Taylor and Ms. Kendrick,

Is the the Beaumont Summit Station Project set for a City Planning Commission hearing on June 28, 2022? If not, could you please tell me what is the newly scheduled, or tentatively scheduled hearing for this project?

Thank you for your assistance.

Regards,
Sheila

Sheila Sannadan
Legal Assistant
Adams Broadwell Joseph & Cardozo
601 Gateway Boulevard, Suite 1000
South San Francisco, CA 94080
Phone (650) 589-1660
Fax (650) 589-5062
[email protected]

From: Christina Taylor
Sent: Wednesday, June 1, 2022 11:06 AM
To: Sheila M. Sannadan ; Carole Kendrick
Subject: RE: Beaumont Summit Specific Plan Project - Hearings

Good morning,

We anticipate the project will be heard at the Planning Commission on June 28 th.

CHRISTINA TAYLOR
Deputy City Manager

City of Beaumont
550 E. 6th Street, Beaumont, Ca 92223

239
Desk (951) 572-3212
BeaumontCa.gov
Facebook | Twitter | Instagram | YouTube

#ACITYELEVATED

From: Sheila M. Sannadan
Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2022 11:02 AM
To: Christina Taylor ; Carole Kendrick
Subject: Beaumont Summit Specific Plan Project - Hearings

Good Morning Ms. Taylor and Ms. Kendrick,

I see that it is mentioned on the City’s website that the Beaumont Summit Station Project is tentatively scheduled for a City Planning Commission hearing on June 28, 2022. https://www.beaumontca.gov/CivicAlerts.aspx?AID=849

Could you please tell me whether this Project is indeed scheduled for a public hearing on June 28, 2022? If not, what is the new tentative, or scheduled, hearing date for this Project?

Thank you for your assistance.

Regards,
Sheila

Sheila Sannadan
Legal Assistant
Adams Broadwell Joseph & Cardozo
601 Gateway Boulevard, Suite 1000
South San Francisco, CA 94080
Phone (650) 589-1660
Fax (650) 589-5062
[email protected]

240
Christina Taylor
From:Amber Foley
Sent:Wednesday, June 29, 2022 11:52 AM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:Summit Station
To the City Council of Beaumont California:

I am writing today to ask you to reject the summit station plans. The huge warehouses approved by the county on cherry valley Blvd are enough. Exeter has painted a pretty picture of a remodeled interchange at cherry valley Blvd and the 10, fancy restaurants, and a big box store, who of course they cannot name. No store is going to commit to any location before that location has been approved to even exist. Exeter is trying to manipulate the residents of this city, and you the council, by honing in on our cities vulnerabilities and promises to fix them. They know we cannot fund the interchange, they know we need local jobs, they pull at parents heart strings with the park plan, but summit station is NOT the answer.

Yes traffic is a problem but, it will still be a problem with a fancy interchange once you add thousands of extra cars and big rigs to the mix; Warehouse jobs are not good paying jobs. Warehouse worker salaries cannot afford to buy a house in Beaumont so most of the jobs will not be held by residents of Beaumont; and Beaumont has plenty of parks already.

Please do not be blinded by the illusion of greatness that Exeter is painting and instead vote NO. This is NOT what your residents want. This is NOT going to help the city grow responsibly. This is simply going to line Exeters pockets at the expense of our residents and their children.

Sincerely,

The Foley family

241
Christina Taylor
From:Alisha C. Pember
Sent:Tuesday, June 28, 2022 6:11 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Cc:Christina Caro; Aidan P. Marshall
Subject:Agenda Item 2: Comments on the Beaumont Summit Station Project (SP2021-0005, PM2021-0009, PLAN2021-0656, PP2021-0388, PP2021-0390, PP2021-0391, Env2021-0017)
Attachments:6128-008acp - Beaumont PC Comments - Item 2 6.28.22 and Exhibits A-B.pdf Good afternoon,

Please see the attached Agenda Item 2: Comments on the Beaumont Summit Station Project (SP2021-0005, PM2021- 0009, PLAN2021-0656, PP2021-0388, PP2021-0390, PP2021-0391, Env2021-0017) and Exhibits A-B.

If you have any questions, please contact Aidan Marshall.

Thank you.

Alisha Pember

Alisha C. Pember
Adams Broadwell Joseph & Cardozo
601 Gateway Boulevard, Suite 1000
South San Francisco, CA 94080
(650) 589-1660 voice, Ext. 24
[email protected]
___________________
This e-mail may contain material that is confidential, privileged and/or attorney work product for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, reliance or distribution by others or forwarding without express permission is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.

242
Christina Taylor
From:Ron Roy
Sent:Monday, June 27, 2022 5:03 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:June 28 2022 Planning Commission Meeting
Attachments:Ron Roy Comment Letter 2022-6-27 Traffic.Road.Transportation Issues.docx; Ron Roy Comments to Beaumont Planning Commission June 28 2022.docx

Hello Christina:

Attached please find comment letters and other attachments that relate to the June 28th Planning Commission hearing on Beaumont Summit Station Specific Plan Amendment.

Please include these attachments to the official record of Planning Commissions hearing on this matter.

Please confirm:

I also expect to send some more documents tomorrow (June 28 2022). Pleas let me know the deadline for tomorrow.

Thank you
Ron Roy

243
Christina Taylor
From:Richard Hobson
Sent:Monday, June 27, 2022 8:14 AM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:Comment for the 6/28/22 meeting of the Planning Commission Other communities seem to be able to finance themselves through a tax base that does not involve destroying their air and roads and peace and quiet. No doubt, there are plenty of people who will profit from another warehouse in our community, but the ordinary people who live here will not.

Do we believe that diesel truck freight transport is the wave of the future? Why not consider catering to the rail industry instead of the trucking industry? Climate considerations are bound to encourage new investments in rail freight. When rail and highway freight come into conflict, future governments are likely to favor rail. Ever-increasing restrictions on diesel exhaust and ever-higher taxes on diesel fuel are on the way. I’ll bet I don’t need to remind anyone that the rail industry builds its own roads, while we, the taxpayers, build the roads for the trucking industry. And we, the taxpayers, maintain those roads despite the fact that the majority of damage to those roads is caused by heavy trucks, not cars. Why not build a forward-looking future for Beaumont instead of another dinosaur palace.

Thanks,

Richard Hobson
8886 Whispering Pines Road
Beaumont CA 92223

1 Christina Taylor
From:Nicole Wheelwright
Sent:Tuesday, October 18, 2022 12:39 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:FW: Opposition to the Summit Station

- Nicole

From: Christine McIntyre
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2022 12:34 PM
To: Nicole Wheelwright
Subject: Opposition to the Summit Station

Good afternoon -

I am writing to you to advise you of my opposition to the Summit Station. As a long-time resident of Beaumont and Cherry Valley, I've seen the negative impact of the overdevelopment of the beautiful open spaces and rural landscapes I moved here for. I've seen the school system, namely the high school, suffer from overpopulation and a lack of resources to support our minors. Our roads are becoming clogged like the roads I left in Los Angeles County. A warehouse will not benefit the community, as it will mar our beautiful landscape, congest our roads, and at best, provide a non-living wage for a handful of residents. There is a vast amount of open space in this county for projects of this nature, Keep Beaumont and Cherry Valley rural. Focus on resources for our children and our community. Like a sports complex or youth center. Heck, leave it open and let us enjoy the beautiful open land and skies. Just because it's not developed doesn't mean it's not valuable.

Thank you for your time.

Christine McIntyre
9285 Rancho Drive
Cherry Valley, CA 92223

2 Christina Taylor
From:Nicole Wheelwright
Sent:Tuesday, October 18, 2022 12:39 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:FW: No on Beaumont Summit Station Project

- Nicole

From: Juan Carlos Medina
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2022 12:35 PM
To: Nicole Wheelwright
Subject: No on Beaumont Summit Station Project

Dear Beaumont City Council,

My name is Dr. Juan Carlos Medina, I am a resident of the Stetson Community in Beaumont. Please accept my apologies for not being able to attend in person, my job requires me to travel quite a bit, but I appreciate the opportunity to contribute my voice and opinion.

I am reaching out today to, once again, adamantly speak out against the proposed changes to the city's Specific Plan as it relates to the Summit Station Project and to ask that you deny the requested changes to the City's zoning.

To be clear, I DO NOT agree with the proposed change to the specific plan from Single Family Residential to Mixed Use Industrial, General Commercial, Open Space zoning and implore you, as representatives of the interests of the residents of Beaumont, to deny the proposed zoning changes and keep the original specific plan in place.

In June, the City of Beaumont's Planning Commission listened to the unified voice of the residents of our beautiful city and voted to recommend that the proposed changes to the Specific Plan be Denied. Similarly, a few years ago, this very council voiced their opposition to the Warehouses that are currently being built on Cherry Valley Blvd. I urge you all to take the recommendation of the planning commission, and your previous opposition to warehouses in a residential area, along with the adamant opposition to this project from your constituents, into consideration as you make your decision tonight.

Moreover, as you prepare to make this decision, I ask that you consider what is most beneficial for the public health, public safety, and the greater long-term future of our beautiful shared city.

As a city committed to providing a safe environment for children to grow, that prides itself on its natural beauty and has statutes in place to limit noise and light pollution at night, we would be working against our own interests if we allowed the specific plan to be changed. In approving the proposed change, and allowing multiple warehouses to be built in the middle of a residential community, so close to three different schools (elementary, middle, and high), we would effectively not only increase noise in the area, but would endanger the many residents that live off of Brookside Ave.

In the multiple misleading flyers, text messages, and phone calls that residents have received, the developer has attempted to claim that the proposed mixed-use project would divert Truck traffic to Cherry Valley and would pose no change to the traffic on Brookside unlike the residential plan. I would beg to differ.

3 It is no secret that big rig trucks and delivery vans not only bring increased traffic, they bring added pollution. With increased traffic, as you know, comes increased air pollution which would endanger the health of our older residents of the Solera Community. Similarly, the added traffic would not only endanger the safety of our children who travel along Brookside Ave. to get to school, it would severely impact the flow of traffic going to and from Brookside Elementary School and Beaumont High School, as increased truck traffic along Cherry Valley would very likely lead more residents to drive along Brookside to avoid the hundreds of trucks on Cherry Valley.

Brookside is already a dangerous road, where at least one death has occured over the past two years. Adding several hundred trucks a day would do nothing for our community. Despite the developers claims that truck traffic would utilize Cherry Valley, it can not guarantee this will be the case. In fact, big rig trucks already utilize brookside on a fairly regular basis, what is to stop the added trucks from utilizing this back road to "speed up" deliveries?

For a city that prides itself on being family friendly, we MUST do what is right for our children. Studies related to the impact of noise pollution on children's learning (Evans and Lepore, 1993; Stansfeld and Clark, 2015) have shown that noise pollution severely affects children's non auditory mental processing which impacts their ability to learn at high levels, as well as their ability to self-regulate. Combine these facts with the increased air pollution and the danger of added traffic, we effectively risk the wellbeing, healthy development, and learning of our children with these proposed changes.

Please do what is right for the residents of Beaumont and accept the recommendation of the Planning Commision by voting to DENY the proposed Changes. This council has already invested time and energy in the past to oppose the Cherry Valley Warehouses and to create a Strategic Plan that zoned the area south of the 60 freeway for Warehouses.

Please listen to your constituents and vote to deny the proposed changes to the specific plan.

I, on behalf of my family, ask that you keep the original specific plan for Single Family Residential in place. We do not need nor want a warehouse in our community, please keep them together south of the 60 freeway.

Sincerely,

Dr. Juan Carlos Medina
PhD: UW-Madison SOE
MAT: Occidental College
Phone: 323.216.0220
Pronouns: he/him/his

4 Christina Taylor
From:Nicole Wheelwright
Sent:Tuesday, October 18, 2022 12:37 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:FW: warehouse

- Nicole

From: [email protected] On Behalf Of [email protected] Sent: Friday, October 14, 2022 9:59 AM
To: Nicole Wheelwright
Subject: warehouse

I can't believe anyone would approve a warehouse directly across from a residential development. Please say NO to this bad idea.

Sincerely,

Michael and Marcia Tulledge
Solera residents

5 Christina Taylor
From:Nicole Wheelwright
Sent:Tuesday, October 18, 2022 12:37 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:FW: Warehouse . No on more moster warehouses in the area. Thought it had been voted down. When doesn't no mean no. There are two schools on Brookside which would have to contend with traffic plus all the homes in the area. Plus the already warehouses. Bea

- Nicole

From: loislsanchez
Sent: Friday, October 14, 2022 10:26 AM
To: Nicole Wheelwright
Subject: Warehouse . No on more moster warehouses in the area. Thought it had been voted down. When doesn't no mean no. There are two schools on Brookside which would have to contend with traffic plus all the homes in the area.

Plus the already warehouses. Beau...

Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone

6 Christina Taylor
From:Nicole Wheelwright
Sent:Tuesday, October 18, 2022 12:36 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:FW: Proposed Warehouse on Brookside

- Nicole
-
-----Original Message-----
From: Heidi Rehm
Sent: Friday, October 14, 2022 10:10 AM
To: Nicole Wheelwright
Subject: Proposed Warehouse on Brookside

I vote “no”. Totally against it

7 Christina Taylor
From:Nicole Wheelwright
Sent:Tuesday, October 18, 2022 12:27 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:FW: I’m against Summit Station Warehouse

- Nicole
-
-----Original Message-----
From: PKpopdU
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2022 12:14 PM
To: Nicole Wheelwright
Subject: I’m against Summit Station Warehouse

Hello. I am a resident of Beaumont, and really horrified at the warehouse scourge.

I worked in transportation engineering before retiring a few years ago, and I worked with regional planning agencies like RCTC and city public works agencies funding and planning projects.

This end run by warehouse developers, to go after the low hanging fruit in these growing outskirts towns, and destroy our communities, it’s really shameful.

Razing the landscape of Beaumont, and building warehouses is not a good infrastructure solution. Being aggressive with RCTC and funding needed projects, and having work on the shelf is the solution. We need to catch up on the egregiously poor planning from the past and keep Beaumont residential, not cave in to unscrupulous warehouse developers promising better roads and recreation. They don’t live in our communities and never will.

Stop the truck traffic, it’s already killing us on Oak Valley. Thanks for your time.

Paul King, VP
Oak Valley 2 HOA

Sent from my iPhone

8 Christina Taylor
From:Nicole Wheelwright
Sent:Tuesday, October 18, 2022 12:07 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:[*Suspicious Link*] FW: Warehouse

- Nicole

From: Jerry Liversage
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2022 11:34 AM
To: Nicole Wheelwright
Cc: Rhea Weber
Subject: [*Suspicious Link*] Warehouse

Hi Nicole

My name is Jerry Liversage. My wife and I are residents at Highland Springs Country Club. Though we are unable to attend the open meeting regarding the warehouse that would be built between Cherry Valley Blvd. and Brookside across from the current two warehouses, we wanted to voice our OPPOSED voices to this endeavor. This addition would make big rig traffic and congestion a terrible nightmare as well as air pollution for our beautiful rural Cherry Valley.

Please re-consider your choice of building this new warehouse.

Thank you,

Rev. Jerry Liversage - DBAC, M-RAS

www.respondingrecoveryministries.org
www.banningnazarene.org
www.jerryliversageministries.org

This electronic mail message and any attachments are from Jerry Liversage Ministries, Inc./Responding Recovery Ministries and are intended only for the addressee(s). This message may contain confidential or sensitive information, which is privileged, and may be subject to various federal and state laws. If you are not the intended recipient of this message or responsible for delivering this email to its intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error. Any review, dissemination, copying, or taking action based on the

9 contents of this information is prohibited. Please promptly delete this message and notify the sender of the delivery error by email.

10 Christina Taylor
From:Nicole Wheelwright
Sent:Tuesday, October 18, 2022 12:07 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:FW: Summit Station

- Nicole

From: marylou noll
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2022 11:35 AM
To: Nicole Wheelwright
Subject: FW: Summit Station

I am still opposed to this development for the reasons stated in my previous email.

The developer is using false information to get residents’ approval. Sunny Acres (475 houses) is no longer being planned or built. Who would want to buy a house close to the warehouses on Cherry Valley Blvd. So why would we want warehouses close to our existing houses.

This developer is not truthful in his mailings so why should we believe he’ll fulfill his promises.

Please do not approve this plan.

Sincerely,

Mary L. Noll
1738 Snowberry Road
Beaumont, CA 92223

Sent from Mail for Windows

From: marylou noll
Sent: Monday, June 6, 2022 11:38 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Summit Station

I am opposed to this development for the following reasons:

This property is not zoned for industrial use. Do not let the developer change the zoning.

11 Air pollution from a 2.5 million sq. ft. warehouse with trucks arriving 24/7. Our air quality is already at risk from the warehouses on Cherry Valley Blvd.

Lack of infrastructure, this area can’t handle 18 wheelers. The proposed change to the Cherry Valley Interchange will take years to build. Brookside over Interstate 10 is only two lanes wide. It can hardly manage the traffic going to and from the high school.

Warehouses do not belong next to residential areas. The City of Colton just stated this in not allowing a warehouse building permit. Beaumont has an Industrial-Warehouse district on 4th Street. Please keep warehouses there.

My husband and I moved to Solera to be close to our son and his family. We wanted a quiet and well-maintained community. We enjoyed the views of the rolling hills and countryside. I lost my husband to Covid in 2020. This development, if approved, will impact the quality of life for myself and 1,290 households in Solera and many more on either side of Interstate 10.

Please do not change the zoning.

Sincerely,

Mary L. Noll
1738 Snowberry
Beaumont, CA 92223

Sent from Mail for Windows

12 Christina Taylor
From:Nicole Wheelwright
Sent:Tuesday, October 18, 2022 12:07 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:FW: Summit Station

- Nicole

From: John Chavez
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2022 11:39 AM
To: Nicole Wheelwright
Subject: Summit Station

Without writing a long opposition to this Ill conceived plan to build and populate a massive warehouse within close proximity of approximately 2300 senior citizens with various respiratory issues is absolutely ludicrous.

Developers are more confident than ever that they can entice city government or county government with numerous come ons then bail out when the political body approves the plan based on promises of a better Beaumont.

We have a history of questionable political behavior in Beaumont this city belongs to the people that live in it. There have been several community discussions relating to warehousing within city limits I have yet to hear a positive tone from any citizen in the community especially from us that have to live with decisions that directly affect our quality of life.

I strongly suggest that the City Council reject this proposed Warehouse and it’s candy covered coating that the citizens would normally approve if not tethered to a 2.5 million sqft Warehouse.

John Chavez
1519 High Meadow Dr
Beaumont CA
A Solera resident

Sent from the all new AOL app for iOS

13 Christina Taylor
From:Nicole Wheelwright
Sent:Tuesday, October 18, 2022 12:06 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:FW: No more warehouses

- Nicole
-
-----Original Message-----
From: Lori Stuart
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2022 11:48 AM
To: Nicole Wheelwright
Subject: No more warehouses

Stop building warehouses until you fix the roads to handle the traffic

Sent from my iPhone

14 Christina Taylor
From:Nicole Wheelwright
Sent:Tuesday, October 18, 2022 12:06 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:FW: Summit Station Warehouse

- Nicole

From: Kent Drinkwater
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2022 11:48 AM
To: Nicole Wheelwright
Subject: Summit Station Warehouse

To members of the Beaumont City Council,
Please do not allow this warehouse to be built without additional streets traveling parallel to the 10 freeway and also additional streets crossing the 10 freeway with an on-ramp in both directions. The traffic is already overwhelming the existing intersections at Cherry Valley Blvd. and the widening of Cherry Valley Blvd. will allow more congestion back up at the intersection. The frontage roads at Cherry Valley need signal lights as it is almost impossible in high traffic hours to enter onto Cherry Valley Blvd from them.

There must be additional ingress and egress to the 10 fwy as well as parallel roads to the 10 fwy prior to construction of the proposed warehouse.

Thank you in advance for your consideration of this matter as it will affect the daily lives of everyone who lives in the area.

Kent Drinkwater

15 Christina Taylor
From:Nicole Wheelwright
Sent:Tuesday, October 18, 2022 12:06 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:FW: Opposing the Warehouse (Summit Station)

- Nicole

From: [email protected]
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2022 12:01 PM
To: Nicole Wheelwright
Subject: Opposing the Warehouse (Summit Station)

Good afternoon,

I am sending you this email to inform you that my family OPPOSE the Summit Station on Cherry Valley Blvd. We are residents of Cherry Valley and DO NOT want this project! Please include our opposition at your meeting tonight. If you need to contact us you are more than welcome.

Dallas and Christy Sterling - 951-845-2363
Sara Mullins (my mom) - 951-845-5288

Sincerely,

Christy Sterling

16 Christina Taylor
From:Nicole Wheelwright
Sent:Tuesday, October 18, 2022 12:06 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:FW: Warehouses

- Nicole

From: Tracy Fry
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2022 12:05 PM
To: Nicole Wheelwright
Subject: Warehouses

Warehouses should not be near are homes, but out in the desert. I oppose summit warehouse and all other future sites.

17 Christina Taylor
From:Nicole Wheelwright
Sent:Tuesday, October 18, 2022 11:29 AM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:FW:

- Nicole

From: [email protected]
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2022 11:28 AM
To: Nicole Wheelwright
Subject:

Against the construction of warehouse

Sent from the all new AOL app for iOS

18 Christina Taylor
From:Nicole Wheelwright
Sent:Tuesday, October 18, 2022 11:26 AM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:FW: Summit Station Warehouse

- Nicole

From: Jacqueline Smith
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2022 11:18 AM
To: Nicole Wheelwright
Subject: Summit Station Warehouse

How in the world monstrosities like these could be considered, let alone, built in our quiet hillside community I have no idea.

The City Council does NOT have the interest of residents at heart, if they allow this warehouse plan to be passed.

Why do they not allow small businesses, like restaurants, to thrive instead? Creating more of a community feel for the area, rather than an industrial, commercial, impersonal wasteland.

I oppose this warehouse and any to come in the future. Let’s look for redevelopment options rather than mowing down our last peaceful open fields!

Sincerely,
Jacqueline Smith
Cherry Valley resident
--

Please consider the environment before printing this email.

19 Christina Taylor
From:Nicole Wheelwright
Sent:Tuesday, October 18, 2022 11:26 AM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:FW: Summit Station proposal

- Nicole
-
-----Original Message-----
From: Nancy Dawes
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2022 11:23 AM
To: Nicole Wheelwright
Subject: Summit Station proposal

Ian against adding more warehouses in
This area we already have enough
Days where are air is bad all this added diesels will not improve our air quality. I have driven past the warehouse built on Cherry Valley Blvd it will be a nightmare when they are u and running already have traffic congestion Al will not improve. I have pulmonary lung problems and some of my family has asthma which has already caused hospitalization.

I do not see how the EPA has approved This has before they didn’t. Vote No Citizens lives are at stake here.

Sent from my iPhone

20 Christina Taylor
From:Kelly Lucia
Sent:Tuesday, October 18, 2022 11:12 AM
To:Christina Taylor; Carole Kendrick
Cc:Bonnie Johnson; Elizabeth Gibbs; Andrew Greybar
Subject:Beaumont Summit Station Public Hearing - City of Calimesa Statement for the Public Record
Attachments:City of Calimesa_Statement on Beaumont Summit Station Project_10.18.2022.pdf Good morning Christina,

Please find attached the City of Calimesa's statement on the Beaumont Summit Station project. We request that this be entered into the record during tonight's public hearing please.

Thank you,

Kelly Lucia, M. URP
Planning Director

Cell 909.809.8778 (preferred)
Office 909.795.9801 ext. 229
Email
[email protected]

21 Christina Taylor
From:Nicole Wheelwright
Sent:Tuesday, October 18, 2022 11:05 AM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:Fwd: emailing comments re Summit Station
Attachments:Summit Station response to council.docx

Nicole Wheelwright
Deputy City Clerk
City of Beaumont
From: bob radabaugh
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2022 3:09:01 PM
To: Nicole Wheelwright
Subject: emailing comments re Summit Station

Thanks for allowing me to voice my concerns.

Bob Radabaugh
886 Annandale Rd
Beaumont CA 92223

22 Christina Taylor
From:Nicole Wheelwright
Sent:Tuesday, October 18, 2022 11:04 AM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:Fwd:

Nicole Wheelwright
Deputy City Clerk
City of Beaumont
From: Nancy Kniep
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2022 3:21:40 PM
To: Nicole Wheelwright
Subject:

No more warehouses in Cherry Valley Ca. Its rural.

Nancy Kniep

23 Christina Taylor
From:Nicole Wheelwright
Sent:Tuesday, October 18, 2022 11:04 AM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:Fwd: Warehouses

Nicole Wheelwright
Deputy City Clerk
City of Beaumont
From: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2022 3:32:35 PM
To: Nicole Wheelwright
Subject: Warehouses

We certainly do NOT need any more warehouses in Beaumont!!!!!!!! What we DO need are some decent restaurants!!!!!!!! We've lived here 18 years and we still do NOT have any nice restaurants!!!!! We would like a Cracker Barrel, Red Lobster and an Olive Garden. Some nice apparel stores would also be nice.

Thank you,
Charlene Weller

24 Christina Taylor
From:Nicole Wheelwright
Sent:Tuesday, October 18, 2022 11:04 AM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:Fwd: Opposition to the Summit Station warehouse

Nicole Wheelwright
Deputy City Clerk
City of Beaumont
From: Marian Putnam
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2022 10:44:19 PM
To: Nicole Wheelwright
Subject: Opposition to the Summit Station warehouse

To the Beaumont City Council:

I am writing to express my opposition to the Summit Station warehouse project. I live in Solera and already suffer the ill effects of the air pollution along the 10 freeway. I can’t imagine another 500 diesel trucks a day clogging up the air, the city streets, and the freeway. Warehouses do not belong near residential neighborhoods.

Additionally, it is well known that 70% of the jobs in today’s warehouses will soon be automated, negating the argument that warehouses are a source of jobs.

Please pay attention to the source of the letters and speakers who support the warehouse. As happened in Banning, much of the support came from construction workers who showed up at Council meetings at the behest of their union.

Construction jobs on warehouses are temporary and do not usually employ local workers.

Also as occurred in Banning, the developer took special pains to avoid calling his project a warehouse. The people of Sun Lakes were promised a “multi-use light industrial building”, restaurants in front of it, and a healthcare building on the lot. All of the extra buildings were later denied by the developer because they would not be easily rented out.

I moved from Sun Lakes, where I was involved in the Pass Action Group protests, to Solera a year ago. I hope the Beaumont City Council is more responsive to their citizens than the Banning City Council has been. This is largely a question of common sense. Take a look at the freeway. Half the lanes are already congested with big rigs. How many more will you add? The air is already thick with pollution in the summertime. How much more can our seniors and asthmatic children breathe in?

Do the right thing. Keep big rigs off our streets and away from your residential neighborhoods. Please say no to the Summit Station warehouse.

Sincerely,
Marian Putnam
973 Pebble Beach Rd.

Beaumont

25 26
Christina Taylor
From:Nicole Wheelwright
Sent:Tuesday, October 18, 2022 11:04 AM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:Fwd: No to Summit Station Warehouse…. Please!

Nicole Wheelwright
Deputy City Clerk
City of Beaumont
From: Pam Sampson
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2022 7:24:33 AM
To: Nicole Wheelwright
Subject: No to Summit Station Warehouse…. Please!

Nicole…
Please vote no to the Summit Station Warehouse. I live in Solera. The two current warehouses built will already bring too much traffic congestion and degrade our air quality, not to mention the eyesore.

Please, please vote no! There has to be a more suitable location, further away from housing, for warehouses to be built.

Thank you. …Pam

Sent from my iPhone

27 Christina Taylor
From:Nicole Wheelwright
Sent:Tuesday, October 18, 2022 11:03 AM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:Fwd: Summit Station

Nicole Wheelwright
Deputy City Clerk
City of Beaumont
From: Tyleen Paige
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2022 8:57:29 AM
To: Nicole Wheelwright
Subject: Fwd: Summit Station

Oops. I messed up the address the first time
Sent from my iPhone

Begin forwarded message:

From: Tyleen Paige
Date: October 17, 2022 at 2:24:30 PM PDT
To: [email protected]
Subject: Summit Station

My name is Audley Tyleen Paige and I am a resident of Cherry Valley and a registered voter. My daughter and her family live in CV also and currently have a son in Beaumont High School. Regarding the Summit Station project I have questions. It seems that is a giant undertaking that, while it might bring revenue to the city of Beaumont, will negatively impact the quality of life for residents in northwest Beaumont and Cherry Valley.

1. Given the monstrosity of the warehouses on Cherry Valley Blvd. by the 10 freeway, what further impact will Summit bring to Cherry Valley Blvd? People who must use the boulevard to get to the freeway are already facing the unknown when 18 wheelers and other large trucks are coming in and out of that facility.

2. What about traffic on Brookside Avenue? With the high school and elementary school there, children in cars, walking, on bicycles going up and down Brookside and side street connectors, what will be the impact on student safety?

3. Will Oak Valley Parkway be impacted with traffic from large trucks also?

28 4. What will be the impact of a construction that large on air quality?

5. What will be the impact on water supplies, fire, public safety, and other services? We are told that Beaumont / CV have enough water this year. But what about the next? Persistent drought must be considered.

6. Dare I even mention the impact on animals that live in that area: coyotes, hawks, rabbits, snakes, burrowing owls, etc.?

The article that came out in the Record Gazette did not seem to address these major concerns. Most of us in Cherry Valley value our rural life. Now it seems as though the county and Beaumont are determined to make this area a giant parking lot and turn us into Orange County. As Joni Mitchell sang, "You pave paradise and put a parking lot." I suspect my comments are about as useful as those many of us made to the county when protesting that giant warehouse construction on Cherry Valley Blvd. As a county employee told my daughter, "Give it up. It's a done deal." Is the Summit Station project "a done deal?"

Bigger is not always better.

29 Christina Taylor
From:Nicole Wheelwright
Sent:Tuesday, October 18, 2022 11:03 AM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:Fwd: opposition to summit station warehouse project

Nicole Wheelwright
Deputy City Clerk
City of Beaumont
From: Trina Brown
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2022 9:16:40 AM
To: Nicole Wheelwright
Subject: opposition to summit station warehouse project

NO more warehouses.

I grew up in Cherry Valley, I am 52 years old. I work for Beaumont Unified School District and I am a solid part of this community. Another warehouse is NOT what we need. The impact on our rural way of life, our small town feel, cannot be reversed. Please do not create another Ontario, a sea of warehouses and industrial muck. That is not Beaumont. Let's preserve what we have while we have the chance. Big money should not be coming in and buying our land for industrial use, compromising the lifestyle of our community and polluting the beautiful surrounding area that we call home. This proposed land is next to housing developments. Let the developes go to open fields away from houses and communities. Let them pollute unpopulated areas that will not have an impact on lifestyle.

With respect, please honor our community and do not sell use out ot big development. Fight to preserve what we have, after it is destroyed with huge industrial complexes there will no going to back to what was.

Thank you,

Trina Brown

30 Christina Taylor
From:Nicole Wheelwright
Sent:Tuesday, October 18, 2022 11:03 AM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:Fwd: Summit Station warehouse

Nicole Wheelwright
Deputy City Clerk
City of Beaumont
From: Elizabeth Laine
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2022 9:43:35 AM
To: Nicole Wheelwright
Subject: Summit Station warehouse

We are opposed to the building of the Summit Station warehouse due to increased environmental and traffic issues.

Richard and Elizabeth Laine.

31 Christina Taylor
From:Nicole Wheelwright
Sent:Tuesday, October 18, 2022 11:03 AM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:Fwd: Stop the destruction.

Nicole Wheelwright
Deputy City Clerk
City of Beaumont
From: Richard Hobson
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2022 9:51:08 AM
To: Nicole Wheelwright
Subject: Stop the destruction.

No more warehouses!
Richard & Carol Hobson (a veteran family)
8886 Whispering Pines Road
Cherry Valley

32 Christina Taylor
From:Nicole Wheelwright
Sent:Tuesday, October 18, 2022 11:03 AM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:Fwd: Summit warehouse

Nicole Wheelwright
Deputy City Clerk
City of Beaumont
From: Marianne Bunn
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2022 10:00:07 AM
To: Nicole Wheelwright
Subject: Summit warehouse

To the Beaumont City Council,
I’m writing this email to voice my opposition to the Summit Warehouse. My husband and I moved to Solera 2 years ago thinking it was a quiet , rural community. Next thing we know there’s a huge warehouse on Cherry Valley road and new plans for a mega warehouse right on our back street. I have many concerns over this project. There will be hundreds of diesel trucks traveling on the same road as local residents along with heavy school traffic. It will contribute to our already poor air quality and lower property values here. The noise level will be unbearable in our own backyards because of all the trucks. I’m respectfully asking that the City Council bands together and votes against this project.

Thank you,
Marianne Bunn

Sent from my iPhone

33 Christina Taylor
From:Nicole Wheelwright
Sent:Tuesday, October 18, 2022 11:02 AM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:Fwd: Summit Warehouse

Nicole Wheelwright
Deputy City Clerk
City of Beaumont
From: Rodney
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2022 10:05:09 AM
To: Nicole Wheelwright
Subject: Summit Warehouse

To the Beaumont City Council,
I’m writing this email to voice my opposition to the Summit Warehouse. My wife and I moved to Solera 2 years ago thinking it was a quiet , rural community. Next thing we know there’s a huge warehouse on Cherry Valley road and new plans for a mega warehouse right on our back street. I have many concerns over this project. There will be hundreds of diesel trucks traveling on the same road as local residents along with heavy school traffic. It will contribute to our already poor air quality and lower property values here. The noise level will be unbearable in our own backyards because of all the trucks.

I’m respectfully asking that the City Council bands together and votes against this project.

Thank you, Rod Bunn
Ps. A vote for this project will get 2 votes against you on the ballot!

34 Christina Taylor
From:Nicole Wheelwright
Sent:Tuesday, October 18, 2022 11:02 AM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:Fwd: Summit Station Warehouse

Nicole Wheelwright
Deputy City Clerk
City of Beaumont
From: LJ Foster
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2022 10:06:42 AM
To: Nicole Wheelwright
Cc: Rhea Weber ; Rhea Weber
Subject: Summit Station Warehouse

Good Day,

As a homeowner in Cherry Valley I strongly oppose allowing the construction of another warehouse in Cherry Valley.

We have decades of scientific studies on the health effects of nitrogen oxides, sulfates, and airborne particulates – all of which will increase in concentration with increased traffic, especially from large diesel trucks. Particulates are tiny fragments from tires, road surfaces, & brake pads; these particulates lodge deeply in lungs and can remain for at least three months. (April 2017 American Chemical Society journal, Nano.) Our health is affected even when pollutant levels are within national “safe” standards. A 12-year study published in 2012 showed that Medicare recipients all over the US had greater mortality as air pollution increased even when those levels remained below national limits (New England Journal of Medicine); a 2007 study of 65,893 people showed that for every increase of only 10 micrograms (millionths of a gram) of particulates per cubic meter of air led to a 24% increase in cardiovascular events & a 76% increase in deaths by heart attack & stroke (also NEJM)...an MIT study in 2013 found that 200,000 premature deaths occur in the US every year due to air pollution...new research shows that air pollution influences rates of obesity, metabolic disease, & diabetes due to hormonal disruption by airborne pollutants...& most recently, air pollutants accelerated brain aging in lab animals, decreased white matter in human brains, and led to a small but measurable increase in the rates of Alzheimer's & other forms of dementia (Sept 2017 issue of Journal of Clinical Neuroscience). Background noise, particularly low-frequencies produced by large vehicle engines, interferes with learning in children. All residents in this area would be affected by the drastic increase in traffic expected with another warehouse being built — it’s bad enough that we’re stuck with the ones already here. Some residents are living with compromised health. All these residents benefit from the relatively cleaner air we have now. Using Cherry Valley as a dumping ground for huge warehouses demonstrates a severe absence of consideration for local residents of all ages.

I came to Cherry Valley almost 25 years ago specifically because of its rural nature. I wanted my mule, peach trees, and chickens in my back yard; barn owls raised their young in my palm tree; kids still ride their horses up my street; neighbors raise goats, tend gardens, and produce other food. Most nights it's pretty quiet after 8 or 9 o'clock. Before I came here, I checked the Riverside County general plan. The general plan is kind of a deal between residents and the governing board. When I looked into the plan, I felt reassured that Cherry Valley would remain rural. As a child, I lived where neighbors had sheep, rabbits, chickens, and a pony, but once the local city took over, we lost our rural lifestyle. I wanted to avoid that when I bought my house.

In summary, the proposed Summit Station Warehouse project is inconsistent with the general plan, clashes with the concerns & wishes of the residents, and would contribute to less healthy living conditions for residents of Cherry Valley and neighboring communities.

Sincerely,

35 Linda Jean Foster
10466 Cherry Avenue
Cherry Valley CA 92223-4817

36 Christina Taylor
From:Nicole Wheelwright
Sent:Tuesday, October 18, 2022 11:02 AM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:Fwd: Summit Station

Nicole Wheelwright
Deputy City Clerk
City of Beaumont
From: Mary Pickett
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2022 10:18:28 AM
To: Nicole Wheelwright
Subject: Summit Station

NO NO NO NO on Summit Station!!!!!!!!! Cherry Valley is already being ruined by the current warehouse being built!! No More!! Please save our air from tons of pollution and our space from MORE overcrowding!!!! Say no to Summit Station!!!!
Thank you,
Mary Anne Pickett
Cherry Valley resident

37 Christina Taylor
From:Nicole Wheelwright
Sent:Tuesday, October 18, 2022 11:02 AM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:Fwd: Summit Station

Nicole Wheelwright
Deputy City Clerk
City of Beaumont
From: Barbara Otte
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2022 10:29:29 AM
To: Nicole Wheelwright
Subject: Summit Station

As Solera residents whose home backs up to Brookside, we want to express our opposition to the Summit Station warehouse project. One monstrous warehouse on Cherry Valley Blvd. is one too many, and two would be a disaster! Please respect the area residents and reject the Summit Station proposal.

Barbara and Wayne Otte

38 Christina Taylor
From:Nicole Wheelwright
Sent:Tuesday, October 18, 2022 11:02 AM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:Fwd: warehouse cherry valley blvd and Brookside

Nicole Wheelwright
Deputy City Clerk
City of Beaumont
From: diane sanford
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2022 10:45:41 AM
To: Nicole Wheelwright
Subject: warehouse cherry valley blvd and Brookside

Please don't allow it! Our mobilization in and out as well as within our community is being disabled by all of these warehouses.

The land they are taking could be used for schools, retail, parks, and many other facilities , especially with the explosion of population in this whole area.

Fight got us...........

39 Christina Taylor
From:Nicole Wheelwright
Sent:Tuesday, October 18, 2022 11:01 AM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:Fwd: Summit Station Warehouse

Nicole Wheelwright
Deputy City Clerk
City of Beaumont
From: Bonnie Landa
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2022 10:49:17 AM
To: Nicole Wheelwright
Subject: Summit Station Warehouse

My parents moved to Cherry Valley in 1985; the rest of my family moved here over 20 years ago.

I moved to Cherry Valley 13 years ago. What appealed to us was the quiet rural atmosphere.

In the 80's & 90's, when I visited my parents, I loved the fresh crisp clean air and their delicious tap water. I'd even bring home jugs of water from their kitchen faucet (better drinking than Arrowhead Water). I used to comment that I wanted to bottle up the air, so I could breathe it at home, in the smoggy Inland Empire.

Beaumont City has succeeded in boxing us in, by approving thousands of houses, encouraging more businesses, and developing few plans to prevent traffic congestion. We can deal with those changes, but we cannot escape the air pollution (from the carcinogenic exhaust produced by thousands of big rigs) invading our area, not to mention the traffic congestion. I am anxious to VOTE NO for Hewitt, who approves of the invasion of warehouses into our area. At the last warehouse meeting I attended with over 100 residents, Hewitt suggested we give up on protesting, because the project was "a done deal".

PLEASE FIND PROPERTY AWAY FROM HOUSING TRACTS TO BUILD WAREHOUSES.

THERE IS ABUNDANT OPEN PROPERTY SOUTH OF SOUTH OF THE 10 FREEWAY.

There are many senior communities here, with seniors who already have respiratory/health problems.... Children will grow up with the pollution and have to deal with the effects of the poisoning earlier in their lives.

Sincerely, Bonnie Landa

40 Christina Taylor
From:Pam Sampson
Sent:Tuesday, October 18, 2022 7:25 AM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:Summit Station Warehouse Opposition!
Taylor,
Please vote no to the Summit Station Warehouse. I live in Solera. The two current warehouses built will already bring too much traffic congestion and degrade our air quality, not to mention the eyesore.

Please, please vote no! There has to be a more suitable location, further away from housing, for warehouses to be built.

Thank you. …Pam

Sent from my iPhone

41 Christina Taylor
From:[email protected]
Sent:Tuesday, October 18, 2022 6:14 AM
To:Christina Taylor; Carole Kendrick; Nicole Wheelwright; Rey Santos; Lloyd White; David Fenn; Julio Martinez
Subject:Michael Lara Says YES for Beaumont Summit Station Please Vote Yes for the Beaumont Summit Station project!

I am a Beaumont resident who supports Beaumont Summit Station because it provides $78 million in traffic funding that the city needs to fix our roads!

The project includes a commercial center along with three industrial buildings. Summit Station offers more benefits, such as jobs and retail amenities, than the housing plan.

Additionally, I support the project because it:

• Prevents an additional 1,640 daily trips on Brookside Ave • Contributes $10 million to a new 123-acre community park and sports complex • Preserves 30 acres of natural open space buffer between residential neighborhoods • Creates 2,800 new permanent jobs from industrial, retail, and restaurant businesses • Saves 112 million gallons of water per year

I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Michael Lara
92223
[email protected]

42 Christina Taylor
From:[email protected]
Sent:Tuesday, October 18, 2022 5:49 AM
To:Christina Taylor; Carole Kendrick; Nicole Wheelwright; Rey Santos; Lloyd White; David Fenn; Julio Martinez
Subject:Darlene Turner Says YES for Beaumont Summit Station Please Vote Yes for the Beaumont Summit Station project!

I am a Beaumont resident who supports Beaumont Summit Station because it provides $78 million in traffic funding that the city needs to fix our roads!

The project includes a commercial center along with three industrial buildings. Summit Station offers more benefits, such as jobs and retail amenities, than the housing plan.

Additionally, I support the project because it:

• Prevents an additional 1,640 daily trips on Brookside Ave • Contributes $10 million to a new 123-acre community park and sports complex • Preserves 30 acres of natural open space buffer between residential neighborhoods • Creates 2,800 new permanent jobs from industrial, retail, and restaurant businesses • Saves 112 million gallons of water per year

I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Darlene Turner
92223
[email protected]

43 Christina Taylor
From:[email protected] mcgee
Sent:Tuesday, October 18, 2022 12:53 AM
To:Christina Taylor
Cc:Rey Santos; Lloyd White; David Fenn; Mike Lara; Julio Martinez; Christina Taylor; Carole Kendrick; Nicole Wheelwright
Subject:Please Vote NO on Beaumont Summit Station Warehouse Projectht Please vote NO on the Beaumont Summit Station WAREHOUSE. I purchased my house and have lived in Beaumont, CA for four-and-one-half years and feel strongly that Beaumont and the Pass area does not need another warehouse for any reason, either for commercial or residential purposes.

I am against the plan because it:
· Builds a 2 million square foot warehouse and the Developer continues to put out false advertising to unsuspecting residents that doesn’t even mention the warehouse; · Is projected to add more than 800 trucks a day without having improved our highway interchanges in ; · Will impact our environment in a dramatically negative way; · The majority of jobs offered are low paying, high turnover jobs, with no benefits; · Data from other cities nearby show that warehouses will affect property values.

I want this to be read into the record at the October 18 City Council meeting.

Norma McGee
92223

44 Christina Taylor
From:TENNIE LUNDY
Sent:Monday, October 17, 2022 8:58 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:Please Vote No On Summit Station Warehouse Project

Sent from my iPhone
To: [email protected]
Cc: Rey Santos ; Lloyd White ; David Fenn
; Mike Lara ; Julio Martinez ;
Christina Taylor ; Carole Kendrick ; Nicole Wheelwright

Please vote NO for the Beaumont Summit Station WAREHOUSE. I have live in the City of Banning since 2013 and my husband has been here 20 years. We feel strongly that Beaumont and the Pass area does not need another warehouse especially on property that is designated for residential use.

I am against the plan because it:
· Builds a 2 million square foot warehouse and the Developer continues to put out false advertising to unsuspecting residents that doesn’t even mention the warehouse · It’s projected to add over 800 trucks a day without having improved our highway interchanges in advance which is totally unacceptable
· Will impact our environment (i.e. traffic and pollution) in a dramatically negative way · The majority of jobs offered are low paying, high turnover with no benefits. · Data from other cities nearby show that warehouses will affect property values.

I want this to be read into the record at the October 18th City Council meeting.

Tennie and Charlie Boggs
92220

45 Christina Taylor
From:JOHN BOGGS
Sent:Monday, October 17, 2022 8:27 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:Beaumont Summit Station
Please vote NO for the Beaumont Summit Station WAREHOUSE. I have lived in Beaumont ) for 6 years and feel strongly that Beaumont and the Pass area does not need another warehouse especially one designated for residential use.

I am against the plan because it:
· Builds a 2 million square foot warehouse and the Developer continues to put out false advertising to unsuspecting residents that doesn’t even mention the warehouse · It’s projected to add over 800 trucks a day without having improved our highway interchanges in advance · Will impact our environment in a dramatically negative way · The majority of jobs offered are low paying, high turnover with no benefits. · Data from other cities nearby show that warehouses will affect property values.

I want this to be read into the record at the October 18th City Council meeting.

Name Kellie &John Boggs
Zip Code 92223

Sent from my iPhone

46 Christina Taylor
From:Brenda Florio
Sent:Monday, October 17, 2022 7:55 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Cc:Rey Santos; Lloyd White; David Fenn; Mike Lara; [email protected]; Christina Taylor; Carole Kendrick; Nicole Wheelwright
Subject:PLEASE VOTE NO on Beaumont Summit Station Warehouse Project Please vote NO for the Beaumont Summit Station WAREHOUSE . I have lived in Beaumont for 4 years and feel strongly that Beaumont and the Pass area does not need another warehouse especially one near residential area and school children. The infrastructure in Beaumont is not even close to being ready to handle ANY additional traffic.

I am against the plan because it:

1. Builds a 2 million square foot warehouse and the Developer continues to put out false advertising to unsuspecting residents that doesn’t even mention the warehouse.

2. Adds over 800 trucks a day without having completed our highway interchanges in advance.

3. Will impact our environment in a dramatically negative way.

4. The majority of jobs offered are low paying, high turnover with no benefits.

5. Data from other cities nearby show that warehouses will affect property values.

I want this to be read into the record at the
October 18th City Council meeting.

Brenda Florio / Ralph Carrocino
92223

47 This message (including any attachments) contains business proprietary/confidential information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law. If you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message. Any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this message, or the taking of any action based on it, without the express permission of the originator, is strictly prohibited.

48 Christina Taylor
From:[email protected]
Sent:Monday, October 17, 2022 7:11 PM
To:Christina Taylor; Carole Kendrick; Nicole Wheelwright; Rey Santos; Lloyd White; David Fenn; Julio Martinez
Subject:Anna Pacleb Says YES for Beaumont Summit Station Please Vote Yes for the Beaumont Summit Station project!

I am a Beaumont resident who supports Beaumont Summit Station because it provides $78 million in traffic funding that the city needs to fix our roads!

The project includes a commercial center along with three industrial buildings. Summit Station offers more benefits, such as jobs and retail amenities, than the housing plan.

Additionally, I support the project because it:

• Prevents an additional 1,640 daily trips on Brookside Ave • Contributes $10 million to a new 123-acre community park and sports complex • Preserves 30 acres of natural open space buffer between residential neighborhoods • Creates 2,800 new permanent jobs from industrial, retail, and restaurant businesses • Saves 112 million gallons of water per year

I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Anna Pacleb
92223
[email protected]

49 Christina Taylor
From:[email protected]
Sent:Monday, October 17, 2022 3:23 PM
To:Christina Taylor; Carole Kendrick; Nicole Wheelwright; Rey Santos; Lloyd White; David Fenn; Julio Martinez
Subject:Nicole Covington Says YES for Beaumont Summit Station Please Vote Yes for the Beaumont Summit Station project!

I am a Beaumont resident who supports Beaumont Summit Station because it provides $78 million in traffic funding that the city needs to fix our roads!

The project includes a commercial center along with three industrial buildings. Summit Station offers more benefits, such as jobs and retail amenities, than the housing plan.

Additionally, I support the project because it:

• Prevents an additional 1,640 daily trips on Brookside Ave • Contributes $10 million to a new 123-acre community park and sports complex • Preserves 30 acres of natural open space buffer between residential neighborhoods • Creates 2,800 new permanent jobs from industrial, retail, and restaurant businesses • Saves 112 million gallons of water per year

I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Nicole Covington
92223
[email protected]

50 Christina Taylor
From:Cheryl Chapman
Sent:Monday, October 17, 2022 3:23 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:Warehouse
Please vote NO on the Summit Station Warehouse.

Cheryl Chapman
Sun Lakes Resident

Sent from my iPhone

51 Christina Taylor
From:Nicole Wheelwright
Sent:Monday, October 17, 2022 2:39 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:FW: Warehouse

- Nicole

From: Cathy Hanes
Sent: Wednesday, October 5, 2022 1:37 PM
To: Nicole Wheelwright
Subject: Warehouse

I would like to make a public comment via email for the October 18, 2022 Beaumont City Council meeting regarding the Summit Station warehouse proposal.

As a homeowner in Cherry Valley, the rural atmosphere is what drew us to purchase our property from a f amily member eleven years ago. They had owned the property since 1987. The wonderful drive up Highland Springs, the cows, the views... the country roads... all attributes that allow for higher property value due to the desire to have these perks and still be close enough to everything you need. The two mile stretch up Highland Springs had no stops... (now there are six I believe.) The four mile scenic drive down Cherry Valley Blvd to downtown... . well... the gas station, market and other family owned businesses... a feed store. Along this drive, there was livestock, goats, ponies and even llamas.. We pay a bit more for gas there, but it was all a part of being a small community. That is why we were willing to pay more to own a home in that area.

Getting off the 10 fwy, it was like the part in the Wizard of Oz where it goes from black and white, to color... another world, separated from the hustle and bustle of nearby cities. This has now been tarnished. Instead of seeing rolling hills and mountains, we see the cement walled warehouse, with a bandaid of trees and shrubs trying to make us believe we don't see what we are seeing. We have not even begun to play cat and mouse with the semi's that will be lined up on the already overburdened roadways. The quaint two lane road will now be a cement divider with four lanes of warehouse traffic going back and forth.

Beaumont now wants to take away even more of the serene countryside. These decisions are permanent. Cherry will never be the same again. What drew people to this area will be lost forever.. and the property values will fall. Soon the whole town will be encroached on by cement, traffic and stop signs.. it will be an industrial area.. possibly as bleak as Fontana. More traffic, more smog... more gray.

It's as if Beaumont is biting the hands that feed them.... if property values drop..so does the revenue from taxes... so it will be a lose, lose situation.

We are begging you to STOP. Focus your attention on keeping and improving the Beaumont/Cherry Valley we already have... focus on community... on picnics and parades...that home town atmosphere... on pride for what Beaumont/Cherry Valley already has to offer.

Don't let YOUR greed, take away what most of us have spent a lifetime building.

Thank you.

52 Cathy Hanes
Cherry Valley Homeowner

--
Cathy Hanes
Stampin' Up Demonstrator

Browse my Journey Time with Stampin' Up shop!

53 Christina Taylor
From:Nicole Wheelwright
Sent:Monday, October 17, 2022 2:38 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:FW: Beaumont Summit Station

- Nicole

From: krislinn951
Sent: Wednesday, October 5, 2022 9:48 PM
To: Nicole Wheelwright
Subject: Beaumont Summit Station

Kristal Morgan
769 Aspen Glen Ln Beaumont, CA 92223
951-398-9992

To whom it may concern:

I oppose Beaumont Summit Station because the increased traffic on an already maxed out infrastructure is detrimental to my child’s asthma and will negatively effect my daily work commute.

I would like to propose to keep the plan residential as this community has a small town feel and functions best being residential neighborhoods. Beaumont’s vision for its commercial industry is to keep future commercial properties built solely in the 4th st commercial district, out of the way of residential neighborhoods, schools and retiree communities.

Our family moved to Beaumont in 2019 from Riverside. We moved here because of the small town feeling and the beautiful neighborhood. We would hate to see warehouses being built in our neighborhoods and the increased unsafe traffic near our children's schools.

Please consider the residents and our children, how they will be affected.

Thank you,

Kristal Morgan
Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone

54 Christina Taylor
From:Nicole Wheelwright
Sent:Monday, October 17, 2022 2:38 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:FW: Warehouse

- Nicole

From: Harry Finigan
Sent: Thursday, October 6, 2022 2:21 PM
To: Nicole Wheelwright
Subject: Warehouse

No on any more warehouses in this area for obvious reasons. We have too many now. Will make area unliveable. Please let them know I am against this project as a resident of the area.

Betty Finigan

55 Christina Taylor
From:Nicole Wheelwright
Sent:Monday, October 17, 2022 2:38 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:FW: Purposed wearhouses

- Nicole
-
-----Original Message-----
From: Lynn Mohling
Sent: Friday, October 7, 2022 12:02 PM
To: Nicole Wheelwright
Subject: Purposed wearhouses

Thank you for considerations. I would like to say no to purposed for more were houses built adjacent to Solera OVG.

We have one and don’t need another. Let other communities share. I feel Traffic congestion will increase on the roads, hwy 10 off of Cherry Valley and increase noise and decrease air quality. Solera has many elderly residence with lung and heart disease negating the reason for moving to Beaumont area.

Thank you

Sent from my iPad

56 Christina Taylor
From:Nicole Wheelwright
Sent:Monday, October 17, 2022 2:38 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:FW: Summit Station

- Nicole
-
-----Original Message-----
From: Amber Foley
Sent: Saturday, October 8, 2022 2:29 PM
To: Nicole Wheelwright
Subject: Summit Station

I am writing to oppose the summit station project. I exit and enter both directions of the 10 freeway at cherry valley daily. Sometimes it takes 20 minutes to get on and off the ramp with 0 big rigs. The county all ready screwed us with that monstrosity of a distribution center that will be operational long before any improvements will be made to the 10/cherry. Sometimes the eastbound exit lane is already stopped into the slow lane causing a traffic hazard and making it a dangerous exit, imagine adding more to that!?! Adding more traffic to these ramps before improvements are made is irresponsible and negligent. On another note, housing communities do not want to live across the street from a warehouse. The noise, pollution, and traffic is NOT what we need near our homes and schools! This park they promise to build is just a shiny bow to the destruction this developer will create to our town to make themselves rich at the residents expense!

Amber Foley

57 Christina Taylor
From:Nicole Wheelwright
Sent:Monday, October 17, 2022 2:38 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:FW: I oppose the Summit bldg as a warehouse

- Nicole

From: Rebecca Lazaroff
Sent: Sunday, October 9, 2022 9:04 PM
To: Nicole Wheelwright
Subject: I oppose the Summit bldg as a warehouse

I live I Beaumont, Four Seasons. I oppose rhe Summit warehouse off the I-10.

Rebecca Lazaroff
Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android

58 Christina Taylor
From:Nicole Wheelwright
Sent:Monday, October 17, 2022 2:37 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:FW: Please Vote Yes for the Beaumont Summit Station Project!

- Nicole
-
-----Original Message-----
From: Gerardo Carmona
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2022 10:26 AM
To: Nicole Wheelwright
Subject: Please Vote Yes for the Beaumont Summit Station Project!

Sent from my iPhone

59 Christina Taylor
From:Nicole Wheelwright
Sent:Monday, October 17, 2022 2:37 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:FW: Please Vote Yes for the Beaumont Summit Station Project!

- Nicole
-
-----Original Message-----
From: Raymond Sharkey
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2022 10:26 AM
To: Nicole Wheelwright
Subject: Please Vote Yes for the Beaumont Summit Station Project!

Sent from my iPhone

60 Christina Taylor
From:[email protected]
Sent:Monday, October 17, 2022 12:11 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:Beaumont Summit Station
Christina

Thank you for coming out to Four Seasons with your presentation on what is in the works for Beaumont. Sadly, the majority of what seems to be planned for Beaumont is warehouses!

As seniors, we moved here because it was a rural community and although it’s grown very rapidly over the past several years, we still get a rural feel.

Traffic has become a problem, but huge truck traffic will not only make it worse, and impact our relatively tranquil way of life; they will travel through our limited shopping and dining areas clogging the roads even more making them more hazardous while rarely ever contributing to those businesses the way residents would. Current traffic will seem like a walk in the park compared to the major nightmare it will become with 18 Wheelers filling our streets. Never mind the diesel fumes degrading our already impacted air quality.

My husband and I urge you and the city council to REJECT the warehouse project at Summit Station and most others planned as well.

Thank you

Rorie Snyder
1562 Rio Grande, Beaumont, Ca
[email protected]
909-973-2870 - cell

61 Christina Taylor
From:Nicole Wheelwright
Sent:Monday, October 17, 2022 2:37 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:FW: Please Vote Yes for the Beaumont Summit Station Project!

- Nicole
-
-----Original Message-----
From: Ruben Castillo
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2022 10:27 AM
To: Nicole Wheelwright
Subject: Please Vote Yes for the Beaumont Summit Station Project!

Sent from my iPhone

62 Christina Taylor
From:Nicole Wheelwright
Sent:Monday, October 17, 2022 2:37 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:FW: Please Vote Yes for the Beaumont Summit Station Project!

- Nicole
-
-----Original Message-----
From: Santino Lachappa
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2022 10:31 AM
To: Nicole Wheelwright
Subject: Please Vote Yes for the Beaumont Summit Station Project!

Yes

Sent from my iPhone

63 Christina Taylor
From:Nicole Wheelwright
Sent:Monday, October 17, 2022 2:37 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:FW: Please Vote Yes for the Beaumont Summit Station Project!

- Nicole

From: Ivan Renovato
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2022 10:31 AM
To: Nicole Wheelwright
Subject: Please Vote Yes for the Beaumont Summit Station Project!

Hello,

I am a Beaumont resident who supports Beaumont Summit Station because it provides $78 million for traffic relief which the city needs to fix our roads!

The project includes a 4-story hotel, restaurants & shopping amenities, and 3 industrial buildings.

Additionally, I support the project because it:

%7 Prevents an additional 1,640 daily trips on Brookside Ave

%7 Contributes $10 million to a new 123 acre community park and sports complex

%7 Preserves 30 acres of natural open space buffer between residential neighborhoods

%7 Creates 2,800 new permanent jobs from industrial, retail, and restaurant businesses

%7 Saves 112 million gallons of water per year

I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Thank you

Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android

64 Christina Taylor
From:Nicole Wheelwright
Sent:Monday, October 17, 2022 2:36 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:FW: Please Vote Yes for the Beaumont Summit Station Project!

- Nicole
-
-----Original Message-----
From: Ruben Castillo
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2022 10:32 AM
To: Nicole Wheelwright
Subject: Please Vote Yes for the Beaumont Summit Station Project!

Yes

Sent from my iPhone

65 Christina Taylor
From:Nicole Wheelwright
Sent:Monday, October 17, 2022 2:36 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:FW:

- Nicole
-
-----Original Message-----
From: Ramiro Ramirez
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2022 10:33 AM
To: Nicole Wheelwright
Subject:

Yes

Sent from my iPhone

66 Christina Taylor
From:Nicole Wheelwright
Sent:Monday, October 17, 2022 2:36 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:FW: Please Vote Yes for the Beaumont Summit Station Project!

- Nicole
-
-----Original Message-----
From: Alex Rodriguez
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2022 10:37 AM
To: Nicole Wheelwright
Subject: Please Vote Yes for the Beaumont Summit Station Project!

Yes

Sent from my iPhone

67 Christina Taylor
From:Nicole Wheelwright
Sent:Monday, October 17, 2022 2:36 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:FW: Please Vote Yes for the Beaumont Summit Station Project!

- Nicole
-
-----Original Message-----
From: chris espinoza
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2022 10:40 AM
To: Nicole Wheelwright
Subject: Please Vote Yes for the Beaumont Summit Station Project!

Yes ڐڑڒ

Sent from my iPhone

68 Christina Taylor
From:Nicole Wheelwright
Sent:Monday, October 17, 2022 2:36 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:FW: Please Vote Yes for the Beaumont Summit Station Project!

- Nicole
-
-----Original Message-----
From: Adan Tellez
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2022 10:41 AM
To: Nicole Wheelwright
Subject: Please Vote Yes for the Beaumont Summit Station Project!

Yes

Sent from my iPhone

69 Christina Taylor
From:Nicole Wheelwright
Sent:Monday, October 17, 2022 2:36 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:FW: Please Vote Yes for the Beaumont Summit Station Project!

- Nicole
-
-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Jones
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2022 10:41 AM
To: Nicole Wheelwright
Subject: Please Vote Yes for the Beaumont Summit Station Project!

I vote yes

Sent from my iPhone

70 Christina Taylor
From:Nicole Wheelwright
Sent:Monday, October 17, 2022 2:36 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:FW: Please Vote Yes for the Beaumont Summit Station Project!

- Nicole
-
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2022 10:43 AM
To: Nicole Wheelwright
Subject: Please Vote Yes for the Beaumont Summit Station Project!

I vote Yes!!

71 Christina Taylor
From:Nicole Wheelwright
Sent:Monday, October 17, 2022 2:36 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:FW: Please Vote Yes for the Beaumont Summit Station Project!

- Nicole
-
-----Original Message-----
From: Lance Reyes
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2022 10:43 AM
To: Nicole Wheelwright
Subject: Please Vote Yes for the Beaumont Summit Station Project!

I vote Yes

Sent from my iPhone

72 Christina Taylor
From:Nicole Wheelwright
Sent:Monday, October 17, 2022 2:36 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:FW: Please Vote Yes for the Beaumont Summit Station Project!

- Nicole
-
-----Original Message-----
From: Ezequiel martinez
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2022 10:43 AM
To: Nicole Wheelwright
Subject: Please Vote Yes for the Beaumont Summit Station Project!

I vote Yes .

Sent from my iPhone

73 Christina Taylor
From:Nicole Wheelwright
Sent:Monday, October 17, 2022 2:36 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:FW: Please Vote Yes for the Beaumont Summit Station Project!

- Nicole

From: Ronald Javier Ruiz Sequeira
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2022 10:43 AM
To: Nicole Wheelwright
Subject: Please Vote Yes for the Beaumont Summit Station Project!

Hello,

I am a Beaumont resident who supports Beaumont Summit Station because it provides $78 million for traffic relief which the city needs to fix our roads!

The project includes a 4-story hotel, restaurants & shopping amenities, and 3 industrial buildings.

Additionally, I support the project because it:

� Prevents an additional 1,640 daily trips on Brookside Ave

� Contributes $10 million to a new 123 acre community park and sports complex

� Preserves 30 acres of natural open space buffer between residential neighborhoods

� Creates 2,800 new permanent jobs from industrial, retail, and restaurant businesses

� Saves 112 million gallons of water per year

I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Thank you

Sent via the Samsung Galaxy S22+ 5G, an AT&T 5G smartphone YES

74 Christina Taylor
From:Nicole Wheelwright
Sent:Monday, October 17, 2022 2:35 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:FW: Please Vote Yes for the Beaumont Summit Station Project!

- Nicole

From: Ronald Javier Ruiz Sequeira
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2022 10:44 AM
To: Nicole Wheelwright
Subject: Please Vote Yes for the Beaumont Summit Station Project!

Hello,

I am a Beaumont resident who supports Beaumont Summit Station because it provides $78 million for traffic relief which the city needs to fix our roads!

The project includes a 4-story hotel, restaurants & shopping amenities, and 3 industrial buildings.

Additionally, I support the project because it:

� Prevents an additional 1,640 daily trips on Brookside Ave

� Contributes $10 million to a new 123 acre community park and sports complex

� Preserves 30 acres of natural open space buffer between residential neighborhoods

� Creates 2,800 new permanent jobs from industrial, retail, and restaurant businesses

� Saves 112 million gallons of water per year

I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Thank you

Sent via the Samsung Galaxy S22+ 5G, an AT&T 5G smartphone

75 Christina Taylor
From:Nicole Wheelwright
Sent:Monday, October 17, 2022 2:35 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:FW: Please Vote Yes for the Beaumont Summit Station Project!

- Nicole
-
-----Original Message-----
From: Dylan Carter
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2022 10:44 AM
To: Nicole Wheelwright
Subject: Please Vote Yes for the Beaumont Summit Station Project!

I vote yes.

Sent from my iPhone

76 Christina Taylor
From:Nicole Wheelwright
Sent:Monday, October 17, 2022 2:35 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:FW: Please Vote Yes for the Beaumont Summit Station Project!

- Nicole
-
-----Original Message-----
From: Lance Reyes
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2022 10:44 AM
To: Nicole Wheelwright
Subject: Please Vote Yes for the Beaumont Summit Station Project!

I vote yes

Sent from my iPhone

77 Christina Taylor
From:Nicole Wheelwright
Sent:Monday, October 17, 2022 2:32 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:FW: Please Vote Yes for the Beaumont Summit Station Project!

- Nicole
-
-----Original Message-----
From: Trav is
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2022 10:45 AM
To: Nicole Wheelwright
Subject: Please Vote Yes for the Beaumont Summit Station Project!

I vote yes

Sent from my iPhone

78 Christina Taylor
From:Nicole Wheelwright
Sent:Monday, October 17, 2022 2:32 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:FW: Please Vote Yes for the Beaumont Summit Station Project!

- Nicole
-
-----Original Message-----
From: Mario Cruz
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2022 10:45 AM
To: Nicole Wheelwright
Subject: Please Vote Yes for the Beaumont Summit Station Project!

I Vote yes

Sent from my iPhone

79 Christina Taylor
From:Nicole Wheelwright
Sent:Monday, October 17, 2022 2:32 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:FW: Please Vote Yes for the Beaumont Summit Station Project!

- Nicole
-
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2022 10:46 AM
To: Nicole Wheelwright
Subject: Please Vote Yes for the Beaumont Summit Station Project!

I Vote yes

Sent from my iPhone

80 Christina Taylor
From:Nicole Wheelwright
Sent:Monday, October 17, 2022 2:32 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:FW: Please Vote Yes for the Beaumont Summit Station Project!

- Nicole
-
-----Original Message-----
From: William Brown
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2022 10:47 AM
To: Nicole Wheelwright
Subject: Please Vote Yes for the Beaumont Summit Station Project!

I vote Yes

Sent from my iPhone

81 Christina Taylor
From:Nicole Wheelwright
Sent:Monday, October 17, 2022 2:32 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:FW: Please Vote Yes for the Beaumont Summit Station Project!

- Nicole

From: Ronald Javier Ruiz Sequeira
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2022 10:47 AM
To: Nicole Wheelwright
Subject: Please Vote Yes for the Beaumont Summit Station Project!

Hello,

I am a Beaumont resident who supports Beaumont Summit Station because it provides $78 million for traffic relief which the city needs to fix our roads!

The project includes a 4-story hotel, restaurants & shopping amenities, and 3 industrial buildings.

Additionally, I support the project because it:

� Prevents an additional 1,640 daily trips on Brookside Ave

� Contributes $10 million to a new 123 acre community park and sports complex

� Preserves 30 acres of natural open space buffer between residential neighborhoods

� Creates 2,800 new permanent jobs from industrial, retail, and restaurant businesses

� Saves 112 million gallons of water per year

I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Thank you

Sent via the Samsung Galaxy S22+ 5G, an AT&T 5G smartphone YES

82 Christina Taylor
From:Nicole Wheelwright
Sent:Monday, October 17, 2022 2:32 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:FW: Please Vote Yes for the Beaumont Summit Station Project!

- Nicole

From: Marco Aguilar
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2022 10:48 AM
To: Nicole Wheelwright
Subject: Please Vote Yes for the Beaumont Summit Station Project!

I vote yes

83 Christina Taylor
From:Nicole Wheelwright
Sent:Monday, October 17, 2022 2:32 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:FW: Please Vote Yes for the Beaumont Summit Station Project!

- Nicole
-
-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew Cisneros
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2022 10:44 AM
To: Nicole Wheelwright
Subject: Please Vote Yes for the Beaumont Summit Station Project!

I Vote Yes

Sent from my iPhone

84 Christina Taylor
From:Nicole Wheelwright
Sent:Monday, October 17, 2022 2:31 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:FW: Please Vote Yes for the Beaumont Summit Station Project!

- Nicole

From: Juan Munoz
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2022 3:37 PM
To: Nicole Wheelwright
Subject: Please Vote Yes for the Beaumont Summit Station Project!

I ask that you vote yes on Beaumont Summit Station. Projects like this put the Beaumont on the map and make it a better place to live.

Best regards,

Juan Munoz
Disclaimer
The information contained in this communication from the sender is confidential. It is intended solely for use by the recipient and others authorized to receive it. If you are not the recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking action in relation of the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.

85 Christina Taylor
From:Nicole Wheelwright
Sent:Monday, October 17, 2022 2:30 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:FW: Please Vote Yes for the Beaumont Summit Station Project!

- Nicole

From: Isaac Anaya
Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2022 2:49 PM
To: Nicole Wheelwright
Subject: Please Vote Yes for the Beaumont Summit Station Project!

Hello,

I am a Beaumont resident who supports Beaumont Summit Station because it provides $78 million for traffic relief which the city needs to fix our roads!

The project includes a 4-story hotel, restaurants & shopping amenities, and 3 industrial buildings.

Additionally, I support the project because it:

� Prevents an additional 1,640 daily trips on Brookside Ave

� Contributes $10 million to a new 123 acre community park and sports complex

� Preserves 30 acres of natural open space buffer between residential neighborhoods

� Creates 2,800 new permanent jobs from industrial, retail, and restaurant businesses

� Saves 112 million gallons of water per year

I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Thank you

86 Christina Taylor
From:Nicole Wheelwright
Sent:Monday, October 17, 2022 2:30 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:FW: Please Vote Yes for the Beaumont Summit Station Project!

- Nicole
-
-----Original Message-----
From: Ricardo Casas
Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2022 2:55 PM
To: Nicole Wheelwright
Subject: Please Vote Yes for the Beaumont Summit Station Project!

Please it will benefit us all
Sincerely JS
Sent from my iPhone

87 Christina Taylor
From:Nicole Wheelwright
Sent:Monday, October 17, 2022 2:30 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:FW: Please Vote Yes for the Beaumont Summit Station Project!

- Nicole

From: Ramses Rodriguez
Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2022 2:56 PM
To: Nicole Wheelwright
Subject: Please Vote Yes for the Beaumont Summit Station Project!

Hello,

I am a Beaumont resident who supports Beaumont Summit Station because it provides $78 million for traffic relief which the city needs to fix our roads!

The project includes a 4-story hotel, restaurants & shopping amenities, and 3 industrial buildings.

Additionally, I support the project because it:

%7 Prevents an additional 1,640 daily trips on Brookside Ave

%7 Contributes $10 million to a new 123 acre community park and sports complex

%7 Preserves 30 acres of natural open space buffer between residential neighborhoods

%7 Creates 2,800 new permanent jobs from industrial, retail, and restaurant businesses

%7 Saves 112 million gallons of water per year

I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Thank you

Sincerely Ramses Rodriguez

Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android

88 Christina Taylor
From:Nicole Wheelwright
Sent:Monday, October 17, 2022 2:30 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:FW: Please Vote Yes for the Beaumont Summit Station Project!

- Nicole

From: Jack Huggins
Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2022 2:58 PM
To: Nicole Wheelwright
Subject: Please Vote Yes for the Beaumont Summit Station Project!

Good afternoon,

I’m a resident of the city of Beaumont and I am in favor of the summit station project, as a construction worker myself I would love the opportunity to work close to home on this project and I like the idea of a new park close to my home.

Thanks you

Jack

Get Outlook for iOS

Disclaimer
THIS MESSAGE IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE ADDRESSEE. IT MAY CONTAIN PRIVILEGED OR CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION THAT IS EXEMPT FROM DISCLOSURE. Dissemination, distribution or copying of this message by anyone other than the addressee is strictly prohibited. If you received this message in error, please notify us immediately by replying: "Received in error" and delete the message.

89 Christina Taylor
From:Nicole Wheelwright
Sent:Monday, October 17, 2022 2:29 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:FW: Please Vote Yes for the Beaumont Summit Station Project!

- Nicole

From: joel beaver
Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2022 2:59 PM
To: Nicole Wheelwright
Subject: Please Vote Yes for the Beaumont Summit Station Project!

Hello,

I am a fellow Beaumont resident,and wanted to show my support for the new summit station project. I feel that it will bring not only work closer for me to home, but benefit the community in many ways. I hope to see a yes across the board and look forward to working with you.

90 Christina Taylor
From:Nicole Wheelwright
Sent:Monday, October 17, 2022 2:29 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:FW: Please Vote Yes for the Beaumont Summit Station Project!

- Nicole
-
-----Original Message-----
From: cristian hernandez
Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2022 3:00 PM
To: Nicole Wheelwright
Subject: Please Vote Yes for the Beaumont Summit Station Project!

i'm in favor of this upcoming project will be a huge help for construction workers as myself to work closer to home and be more involve in my community

Sent from my iPhone

91 Christina Taylor
From:Nicole Wheelwright
Sent:Monday, October 17, 2022 2:29 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:FW: Please Vote Yes for the Beaumont Summit Station Project!

- Nicole

From: Jerry Huerta
Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2022 2:58 PM
To: Nicole Wheelwright
Subject: Please Vote Yes for the Beaumont Summit Station Project!

I’m a Beaumont resident and I am in favor to Please Vote Yes for the Beaumont Summit Station project!
The project includes a 4-story hotel, restaurants & shopping amenities, and 3 industrial buildings.

More importantly, I am a Beaumont resident who supports Beaumont Summit Station because it provides $78 million for traffic relief which the city needs to fix our roads!This will also save a lot of water and gas for me and other local workers.

Gerald Huerta
92220
[email protected]

Sent from my iPhone

92 Christina Taylor
From:Nicole Wheelwright
Sent:Monday, October 17, 2022 2:29 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:FW: Please Vote Yes for the Beaumont Summit Station Project!

- Nicole
-
-----Original Message-----
From: Bryan Calderon
Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2022 2:58 PM
To: Nicole Wheelwright
Subject: Please Vote Yes for the Beaumont Summit Station Project!

I am a Beaumont resident who supports Beaumont Summit Station because it provides $78 million for traffic relief which the city needs to fix our roads! Also to say I want work closer to home because I want to be close to my family here in Beaumont

Bryan Calderon

93 Christina Taylor
From:Nicole Wheelwright
Sent:Monday, October 17, 2022 2:29 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:FW: Please Vote Yes for the Beaumont Summit Station Project!

- Nicole
-
-----Original Message-----
From: romeo rodriguez
Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2022 3:01 PM
To: Nicole Wheelwright
Subject: Please Vote Yes for the Beaumont Summit Station Project!

To whom it may concern,
I would really appreciate your vote in approving the Summit Station Project, this project would greatly benefit Beaumont and all the wonderful people in the community. Aside from bringing much needed employment to the community, the funds this would provide to addressing some of the infrastructure needs would go a long way in alleviating the congestion problems on the cherry valley off-ramp.

Thank You,
Romeo Rodriguez

Sent from my iPhone

94 Christina Taylor
From:Nicole Wheelwright
Sent:Monday, October 17, 2022 2:29 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:FW: Please Vote Yes for the Beaumont Summit Station Project!

- Nicole

From: tropicGBR palying
Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2022 2:56 PM
To: Nicole Wheelwright
Subject: Please Vote Yes for the Beaumont Summit Station Project!

Hey I’m a resident of Beaumont and if you voted yes on the summit station it would greatly effect me so that I wouldn’t have to drive so far away for work anymore. I am driving over 100 miles for work right now and this would cut down on my daily commute. Thank you

Sent from my iPhone

95 Christina Taylor
From:Nicole Wheelwright
Sent:Monday, October 17, 2022 2:29 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:FW: Opposition to Summit Station Warehouse Proposal

- Nicole

From: Greg & Debby
Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2022 1:27 PM
To: Nicole Wheelwright
Subject: Opposition to Summit Station Warehouse Proposal

Please submit the opposition of my husband and I to the proposed Summit Station Warehouse again be considered on October 18. We live in the senior community of Solera Oak Valley Greens and this project will be located across the street and just down from us.

Enough is enough! Our beautiful community will soon be overrun by trucks from the other project down by Cherry Valley Blvd. and now you are considering this project!! And all residents of Banning in the Sun Lakes area are facing detrimental problems with the approval of the project down in that area. Trying to navigate all the traffic now to shop down in that area is extremely difficult for all residents in Banning and Beaumont and will be unimaginable in the foreseeable future.

We hope you will consider the pleas of your constituents and deny this project.

Sincerely, Gregory P. and Deborah K. Chamberlin

96 Christina Taylor
From:Nicole Wheelwright
Sent:Monday, October 17, 2022 2:28 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:FW: SUMMIT STATION

- Nicole

From: [email protected]
Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2022 1:45 PM
To: Nicole Wheelwright
Subject: SUMMIT STATION

Dear Beaumont City Council:

As a long-time Beaumont resident living in Solera I urge the Beaumont City Council to vote NO on the Summit Station project. Please act on the "NO" recommendation of the Planning Commission and act in the best interest of the residents of Beaumont. Don't turn your back on the residents of Beaumont as the Banning City Council did when approving a warehouse across from Sun Lakes and next to The Lakes.

Regards,
Gary M. Stoh
Solera Resident

97 Christina Taylor
From:Nicole Wheelwright
Sent:Monday, October 17, 2022 2:28 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:FW: Warehouse

- Nicole

From: Susan Miller
Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2022 4:20 PM
To: Nicole Wheelwright
Subject: Warehouse

Please stop this warehouse from going in so close to a residential area. We have had enough. Beaumont will lose all a round. No longer will it be the special community pucked in a beautiful the shadow of the beautiful mountains.

We have enough warehouses let’s put in a beautiful park or something that will enrich the community. It is a community not a manufacturing warehouse eyesore.

Thank you
Sue Miller

98 Christina Taylor
From:Nicole Wheelwright
Sent:Monday, October 17, 2022 2:27 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:FW: SUMMIT WAREHOUSE

- Nicole

From: [email protected]
Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2022 4:22 PM
To: Nicole Wheelwright
Subject: SUMMIT WAREHOUSE

I urge you to vote NO on approving the building of the Summit Station project. The traffic, air quality, and congestion will be detrimental to the many senior communities, neighborhood communities and schools surrounding this area. And the freeway traffic entering and exiting the Cherry Valley off ramp from the 10 freeway will be an absolute nightmare. I am not opposed to warehouse distribution centers; however, they should be built in appropriate areas – building them in residential areas is not an appropriate area.

Lane Joel

Virus-free. www.avast.com

99 Christina Taylor
From:Nicole Wheelwright
Sent:Monday, October 17, 2022 2:27 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:FW: Summit Station

- Nicole

From: Bud Charlick
Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2022 4:29 PM
To: Nicole Wheelwright
Subject: Summit Station

Dear Beaumont City Council Members:

Please consider voting NO on the proposed Summit Station Warehouse and Hotel . Please consider the residents who reside in Solera and Stetson as this Warehouse and Hotel will impact our way of life. Brookside Avenue was never meant to be a highway as it does not connect to 1-10 and is merely a method of getting from Highland Springs to Desert Lawn.

Currently it has become a speedway with parents and students going to Beaumont High School. If Summit Station is approved, with the advent of 1600 more vehicles on the "road".each day, residents will not be able to exit from their developments onto Brookside .

WE feel it would be better to leave the zoning as it has been to build the 495 homes as this would benefit Beaumont better with the additional tax revenue .

Again, we pray that you will consider your residents who reside in Solera and Stetson and vote NO on this action.

Bud Charlick
1192 Lantana Road
[email protected]
951-769-6465

100
Christina Taylor
From:Nicole Wheelwright
Sent:Monday, October 17, 2022 2:27 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:FW: oppose summit station warehouse

- Nicole

From: [email protected]
Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2022 4:55 PM
To: Nicole Wheelwright
Subject: oppose summit station warehouse

my husband and i are seniors living in solera. i cannot believe that beaumont would even consider another warehouse. the traffic the bad air quality the noise the water usage i can go on and on. protect your citizens vote NOOO on this project. there are plenty of other places for them to build their warehouses without infringing on our quality of life
jack and carole clark
1590 tanglewood court
beaumont

101
Christina Taylor
From:Nicole Wheelwright
Sent:Monday, October 17, 2022 2:27 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:FW: Summit station warehouse

- Nicole
-
-----Original Message-----
From: Sharon Waitman
Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2022 6:05 PM
To: Nicole Wheelwright
Subject: Summit station warehouse

Nicole,
I have lived off brookside since 1995. First on Union street on a farm and then in Solera since 2005. This is a beautiful area to live with the surrounding mountains, open spaces, blue skies.

This is all being destroyed by the greed of cities and counties.

There are so many other areas that are the appropriate location, not adjacent to residential communities.

I urge the beaumont governing body to deny this project and consider the community first.

Sharon waitman
1048 Northview st
Beaumont ca 92223

102
Christina Taylor
From:Nicole Wheelwright
Sent:Monday, October 17, 2022 2:26 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:FW: Proposed warehouse outside Solera

- Nicole

From: Nancy Friedman
Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2022 6:05 PM
To: Nicole Wheelwright
Subject: Proposed warehouse outside Solera

Please do not put another warehouse in my community. I retired here to have some peace and quiet and clean air to breathe. We already have enough warehouses in this area and don’t want or need any more. This will change our lives and not for the better.

A concerned citizen

103
Christina Taylor
From:Nicole Wheelwright
Sent:Monday, October 17, 2022 2:26 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:FW: PLEASE VOTE AGAINST Summit Station Warehouse Proposal!!

- Nicole

From: Peggy Rockwell
Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2022 8:58 PM
To: Nicole Wheelwright
Cc: Peggy Rockwell
Subject: PLEASE VOTE AGAINST Summit Station Warehouse Proposal!!

Hi Nicole,
We moved to Solera four years ago to enjoy retirement and literally get away from the stress of traffic congestion, etc. and move into a peaceful area where the air quality was also of utmost importance regarding my husband's health.

SUMMIT STATION POSES A GREAT DETRIMENT -- creating traffic havoc/congestion, air, and noise pollution that would greatly impact thousands of seniors AND families, alike. It would be doing the very opposite of the numerous reasons why so many decided to make Beaumont their "home" -- alongside the fact that the surrounding landscape and peaceful hillside views of Beaumont makes it such a pleasant and attractive city in which to live -- and thrive! Beaumont's residents are extremely grateful that the City of Beaumont has, indeed, listened and "heard" the 'voice' of its residents by having voted against Summit Station.

However, the residents of Beaumont are now finding themselves pleading for CITY COUNCIL to stand alongside, in agreement, and to partner with the same conscientious that made the determination of the City of Beaumont to 'stand in the gap' for its citizens and VOTE AGAINST the Summit Station project.

By so doing, City Council will, ULTIMATELY, have greatly proven that they -- like the City of Beaumont -- respect the wishes, honor, and value the lives of its thousands of residents.

It is our hope that City Council will have demonstrated to have truly 'listened', 'heard', and PROVEN -- themselves -- to be trustworthy by governing in a way that places consideration of the needs of its citizens as a 'TOP' priority -- a City Council that the residents of Beaumont desires to respect and can be proud of.

PLEASE SHOW US YOU CARE! Thank you.

104
Very sincerely,
James & Peggy Rockwell
812 Annandale Rd, Beaumont, CA 92223

105
Christina Taylor
From:Nicole Wheelwright
Sent:Monday, October 17, 2022 2:26 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:FW: Warehouse on Brookside

- Nicole
-
-----Original Message-----
From: CAROL ENNIS
Sent: Friday, October 14, 2022 6:24 AM
To: Nicole Wheelwright
Subject: Warehouse on Brookside

I am totally opposed to building the warehouse on Brookside. It is very close to a senior community and is not goid for our health

Carol Ennis
966 Hidden Oaks
Beaumont, CA

106
Christina Taylor
From:Nicole Wheelwright
Sent:Monday, October 17, 2022 2:26 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:FW: Summit Station Warehouse

- Nicole
-
-----Original Message-----
From: Roadrunner
Sent: Friday, October 14, 2022 8:03 AM
To: Nicole Wheelwright
Subject: Summit Station Warehouse

Nicole and the rest of the Beaumont City Council

I have lived here 16 years and loved the rural location. However, recently Beaumont has turned into a warehouse mecca! I fought the Cherry Valley sneaky zone change to get that monstrosity built- I don’t want another warehouse out my back door. I live in Solera and the roads do not accommodate 18 wheelers and the on ramps are already a mess and the cherry valley warehouse is not even in operation yet The city should be working on making the traffic lights work to keep the flow of traffic more efficient instead of being a mess on Highland Springs and Beaumont avenues.

Most of this city’s streets are in need of repair and haven’t been worked on the entire time I have lived here. The only businesses we attract are dollar stores, car washes, auto parts stores and 7-11s.

Why can’t we get something like Black Beat Restaurants or Trader Joe’s Right now though I am concentrating on this unwanted warehouse!

I DON’T WANT ANY WAREHOUSE IN BEAUMONT AREA!

Patty Grana
Beaumont Resident

Sent from my iPad

107
Christina Taylor
From:Nicole Wheelwright
Sent:Monday, October 17, 2022 2:25 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:FW: Proposed new warehouses

- Nicole

From: Michael Rezinas
Sent: Friday, October 14, 2022 9:00 AM
To: Nicole Wheelwright
Subject: Proposed new warehouses

As a resident of Beaumont for just under five years I’ve already seen the dramatic effect these mega warehouses are doing to our beautiful city. We must put a stop to this insidious growth. Think about the destruction of our environment by the pollution these hundreds of semi trucks are dumping upon us. We must stop now!

Thank you,

Mike
--
Thanks

Mike

108
Christina Taylor
From:Nicole Wheelwright
Sent:Monday, October 17, 2022 2:25 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:FW: Reg. Summit Station Warehouse

- Nicole

From: Hubbs, Angela
Sent: Friday, October 14, 2022 11:31 AM
To: Nicole Wheelwright
Subject: Reg. Summit Station Warehouse

Hello Members of Beaumont City Council,

I am writing today to firmly oppose the Summit Station Warehouse Project. I have lived in the Beaumont area for 26 years. One of the reasons we moved to Beaumont was for the small town rural way of living. Beaumont has grown tremendously from 1995 at around 10,000 population to almost 50,000. Although I know that growth is inevitable, I do not feel that the Summit Warehouse project should be a part of that growth. There are more suitable areas for this project to be built and I don't feel that right in the middle of town, down the street from a high school and an elementary school is the right place. Please listen to the residents of this once small town city and vote NO on this project.

Thank You,
Angie Hubbs PSR
Family Medicine Beaumont/Banning
81 Highland Springs Avenue
Beaumont, CA 92223
951-846-2611 ext. 23001

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain confidential and privileged information for the use of the designated recipients named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this communication in error and that any review, disclosure, dissemination, distribution or copying of it or its contents is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify me immediately by replying to this message and destroy all copies of this communication and any attachments. Thank you.

109
Christina Taylor
From:[email protected]
Sent:Monday, October 17, 2022 1:59 PM
To:Christina Taylor; Carole Kendrick; Nicole Wheelwright; Rey Santos; Lloyd White; David Fenn; Julio Martinez
Subject:Eric Rutherford Says YES for Beaumont Summit Station Please Vote Yes for the Beaumont Summit Station project!

I am a Beaumont resident who supports Beaumont Summit Station because it provides $78 million in traffic funding that the city needs to fix our roads!

The project includes a commercial center along with three industrial buildings. Summit Station offers more benefits, such as jobs and retail amenities, than the housing plan.

Additionally, I support the project because it:

• Prevents an additional 1,640 daily trips on Brookside Ave • Contributes $10 million to a new 123-acre community park and sports complex • Preserves 30 acres of natural open space buffer between residential neighborhoods • Creates 2,800 new permanent jobs from industrial, retail, and restaurant businesses • Saves 112 million gallons of water per year

I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Eric Rutherford
92223
[email protected]

110
Christina Taylor
From:Social P
Sent:Monday, October 17, 2022 1:38 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Cc:Rey Santos; Lloyd White; David Fenn; Mike Lara; Julio Martinez; Carole Kendrick; Nicole Wheelwright
Subject:Beaumont Summit Station Comments

As a 16 ½ year resident of Beaumont, I applaud the Council’s recent development and adoption of a Policy on Land Use and Sensitive Receptors. This policy will provide a foundation and formal framework to guide growth management decisions toward prudent stewardship by City leadership. Thank you for the foresight.

This letter registers my opposition to the proposed Beaumont Summit Station Warehouse development. I respectfully implore every Council Member to align with the recommendation of the Planning Commission and VOTE NO on amending Plans or taking any other action that would allow the proposed Beaumont Summit Station warehouse.

Land Use Falsely Represented
 According to comments made during the July, 2022 Planning Commission meeting, the developer, distributed project advertising to residents omitting mention of its plan for the proposed two million square foot warehouse. Really? They just forgot about the majority (96%) of their proposed project? What was distributed was a devious misrepresentation of the project.  Beaumont Planning Commissioners noted that there are other areas in town already zoned for similar purposes that Exeter Cherry Valley Land, LLC is striving for. The city should not be compelled to rezone the land to industrial/commercial, nor approve the proposed project.

Reality Check: How Would Low Wage Warehouse Jobs Benefit Beaumont Residents? The developer claims that the Summit Station warehouse project would provide 2800 jobs. Realistically, those jobs would not likely be filled by Beaumont residents.  $31,000 - $46,000 Average warehouse worker’s gross annual wages  $500,000 Median home price in Beaumont
 $100,000 Annual income needed to purchase a $500k home; easily twice what warehouse workers are paid.
 Low wage warehouse jobs would simply not provide Beaumont residents/workers enough income to live in Beaumont, a city with growing property prices and high property taxes.

111
Environmental Impact – Truck Emissions
A quick fact-check on the assertion about homes having a greater significant impact than the proposed warehouse…
 The average truck’s carbon footprint to be 201,834 kilograms or 223 tons of carbon dioxide. According to The Nature Conservancy, the average yearly carbon footprint of a person in the United States is 16 tons. This means the average truck impacts our atmosphere each year as much as 14 people.”

Why would we want to allow increased truck traffic at this location so near family homes including sensitive senior communities?

 Resources and Services
o Now is not the time to further dilute diminishing water resources by adding an additional draw of the magnitude required for a 2 million square foot warehouse employing 2800 people!
o Given the Summit Station Draft EIR, the warehouse will use electric yard and cargo handling equipment. In addition to the electricity required to support general operation of a warehouse, all that equipment will need charging stations. While in theory this sounds good, again, locally, the SCE grid is inadequate to support the addition of this warehouse’s electricity requirements and doing so would further dilute an already over-burdened utility resource, the consequences of which will be more outages for Beaumont residents, businesses and municipal needs.

Address Infrastructure Deficiencies Prior to New Large-Scale Development It is understood that the city is obligated to give fair consideration to the owner of the property proposed for the Summit Station warehouse, but isn’t the city first and foremost obligated to prudent stewardship on behalf of its constituents? Please do not approve any warehouse projects unless and until the City can assure residents of a solid plan to correctly and timely resolve infrastructure deficiencies. Failure to do so will impose additional strain on current roads, traffic, utility resources, and dilute availability and response times for emergency services.

Kindly read and formally register into the record of the October 18, 2022 Beaumont City Council meeting, my comments in opposition to any Plan Amendment that would allow the proposed Beaumont Summit Station warehouse project to move forward.

Respectfully submitted,
Patricia Putnam
187 Brush Creek

112
Beaumont, CA 92223

113
Christina Taylor
From:Nicole Wheelwright
Sent:Monday, October 17, 2022 1:35 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:FW: Resolution Opposing Beaumont Summit Station Warehouse Attachments:Resolution oppositng Summit Station.docx
***This one has an attachment***

- Nicole

From: Marcia
Sent: Friday, October 14, 2022 7:19 PM
To: Nicole Wheelwright
Subject: FW: Resolution Opposing Beaumont Summit Station Warehouse

Attached is a Resolution Opposing the Beaumont Summit Station warehouse Which, was adopted by the Board of Directors for Solera Oak Valley Greens Homeowners Association on May 9, 2022.

We would like to make sure the members of the City Council of Beaumont are aware of our opposition to this project.

Thank you,

Marcia Casem
President

Sent from Mail for Windows

114
Christina Taylor
From:Nicole Wheelwright
Sent:Monday, October 17, 2022 1:34 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:FW: Summit Station

- Nicole

From: Carolyn Snell
Sent: Saturday, October 15, 2022 12:02 PM
To: Nicole Wheelwright
Subject: Fwd: Summit Station

Sent from my iPhone

Begin forwarded message:

From: Carolyn Snell
Date: October 15, 2022 at 11:55:17 AM PDT
To: [email protected]
Subject: Summit Station

I totally oppose the Summit Station. Gateway is enough for the area. Would cause to much truck traffic and pollution let alone an eye sore.

Sent from my iPhone

115
Christina Taylor
From:Nicole Wheelwright
Sent:Monday, October 17, 2022 1:31 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:FW: SUMMIT STATION PROJECT

- Nicole

From: CATHI MENDOZA
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2022 12:55 PM
To: Nicole Wheelwright
Subject: SUMMIT STATION PROJECT

I am writing in regards to the Summit Station project.

I believe this project should be tabled at this time due to many reasons. Let’s start with infrastructure. An example, this past weekend, there was an accident at Cherry Valley Bl EB off ramp area. Fr eeway traffic is exiting to travel on Calimesa Bl to avoid the slow down. Now there’s HEAVY congestion at the Calimesa Bl / Cherry Valley Bl stop sign. So, bad that CHP had to come and direct traffic. Now that you have a visual of a situation, image adding 100+ big rig trucks to this mix?

The Cherry Valley Bl off ramp is heavily congested at times. The day, and time of day makes a difference when using both off ramps. Adding more traffic, such as numerous big rigs, is not a good neighborly mix.

Where will the idle trucks stay waiting for their load? Along the roadways is not a good mix.

The roads in and out of Cherry Valley are limited. The saturation of everyone leaving at once during an evacuation would be a complete nightmare. Keep in mind of the ranches in the area with many animals. The Apple and El Dorado fires are examples of this. Getting the many horse and animal trailers in / out of the area was successful but very timely due to traffic. Now add the addition big rig traffic to the mix.

Now, let’s add in the unhealthy air. Many individuals with health problems live in the area for the clean air. Think of a loved one with asthma or using an oxygen tank to breathe. Plus the long exposure to these harmful elements.

The environment for the wildlife is dwindling. These poor creatures are losing their homes to human expansion.

Please put of the needs of infrastructure and community before a large project…. don’t put the cart before the horse.

Catherine Mendoza

Sent from Mail for Windows

116
Christina Taylor
From:[email protected]
Sent:Monday, October 17, 2022 12:58 PM
To:Christina Taylor; Carole Kendrick; Nicole Wheelwright; Rey Santos; Lloyd White; David Fenn; Julio Martinez
Subject:samuel Fausto Says YES for Beaumont Summit Station Please Vote Yes for the Beaumont Summit Station project!

I am a Beaumont resident who supports Beaumont Summit Station because it provides $78 million in traffic funding that the city needs to fix our roads!

The project includes a commercial center along with three industrial buildings. Summit Station offers more benefits, such as jobs and retail amenities, than the housing plan.

Additionally, I support the project because it:

• Prevents an additional 1,640 daily trips on Brookside Ave • Contributes $10 million to a new 123-acre community park and sports complex • Preserves 30 acres of natural open space buffer between residential neighborhoods • Creates 2,800 new permanent jobs from industrial, retail, and restaurant businesses • Saves 112 million gallons of water per year

I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

samuel Fausto
92220
[email protected]

117
Christina Taylor
From:Nicole Wheelwright
Sent:Monday, October 17, 2022 12:24 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:FW: our opposition to the proposed Summit station Warehouse, Beaumont

- Nicole

From: [email protected]
Sent: Saturday, October 15, 2022 5:01 PM
To: Nicole Wheelwright
Subject: Re: our opposition to the proposed Summit station Warehouse, Beaumont

Gentlepersons

Re: Our opposition to the proposed Summit Station Warehouse, Beaumont (Public Hearing on October 18, at 6 p.m.)

We are writing this email to voice our opposition to the proposed warehouse. This proposed warehouse will take up lot of space ruining our enjoyment and benefits of nature; will increase the truck traffic making the current traffic worse; and will further pollute the already polluted riverside air.

Please let us know if our opinion counts and how do you make the decision?

Thank you.

Sushma Puri and Pramod Puri, 1608 Woodlands Rd., Beaumont, CA

118
Christina Taylor
From:Nicole Wheelwright
Sent:Monday, October 17, 2022 12:24 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:FW: Warehouses

- Nicole

From: janet brouwer
Sent: Saturday, October 15, 2022 8:15 PM
To: Nicole Wheelwright
Subject: Warehouses

I moved to Beaumont because it is a nice city.My husband and I do not want the warehouses here .I hope the council will think about the us that live here and pay our taxes.PLEASE DO NOT GIVE PERMISSION AND PERMITS TO BUILT

Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPad

119
Christina Taylor
From:Nicole Wheelwright
Sent:Monday, October 17, 2022 12:24 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:FW: Summit Station warehouses

- Nicole

From: Willie Hill
Sent: Sunday, October 16, 2022 2:50 PM
To: Nicole Wheelwright
Subject: Summit Station warehouses

I oppose the building of the Summit Station warehouse project.

We still don't know the effects of traffic caused by the trucks from the warehouses on Cherry Valley road not to mention the air pollution caused by these trucks.

Willie Hill
1747 Las Colinas rd
Beaumont, CA 92223
951-769-1272

120
Christina Taylor
From:Nicole Wheelwright
Sent:Monday, October 17, 2022 12:24 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:FW:

- Nicole

From: Kate Taylor
Sent: Sunday, October 16, 2022 4:26 PM
To: Nicole Wheelwright
Subject:

Summit Warehouse

Please don't approve/allow another warehouse in this obviously residential area! I understand that warehouses are necessary, but zoning changes to accommodate the promise of future revenue is short sighted. Is the goal really to cause Beaumont to be the next crime ridden San Bernardino or Moreno Valley?

Kate Taylor
1111 Silverleaf Canyon Rd, Beaumont, CA 92223

121
Christina Taylor
From:Nicole Wheelwright
Sent:Monday, October 17, 2022 12:23 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:FW: Proposed Summit Station Warehouse

- Nicole

From: Diane Tepper
Sent: Sunday, October 16, 2022 4:41 PM
To: Nicole Wheelwright
Subject: Proposed Summit Station Warehouse

I am opposed to the Summit Station Warehouse proposed project. I've lived in Solera for 18 years as the original owner, and I don't want to be so close to the warehouse with everything that goes along with it.

Thank You,

Diane Tepper

122
Christina Taylor
From:Nicole Wheelwright
Sent:Monday, October 17, 2022 12:23 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:FW: NO to Transfer Station

- Nicole
-
-----Original Message-----
From: Janet Carpenter
Sent: Sunday, October 16, 2022 6:06 PM
To: Nicole Wheelwright
Subject: NO to Transfer Station

Dear Beaumont City Council members,

I am a new resident of Solera Oak Valley Greens and do not approve of a warehouse transfer station in the area of Cherry Valley and Brookside Ave. The trucks must not interfere with traffic at the nearby schools and the local Noble Park area.

Beaumont is a bedroom community with mostly mom and pop businesses and we would like to keep it this way.

The current traffic issues we face in order to access the 10 and the 60 are bad. We are also dealing with the train tracks on the other side of town. Beaumont is not the right fit for constant trucking traffic.

Thank you for your consideration.

Janet Carpenter
Solera Oak Valley Greens

From Janet

123
Christina Taylor
From:Nicole Wheelwright
Sent:Monday, October 17, 2022 12:23 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:FW: Regarding Summit Station Warehouse

- Nicole
-
-----Original Message-----
From: Malulani Beale
Sent: Sunday, October 16, 2022 9:37 PM
To: Nicole Wheelwright
Subject: Regarding Summit Station Warehouse

To Beaumont City Council,
I oppose the Summit Station Warehouse project. This prospective warehouse is undesirable to most residents in Beaumont, Calimesa, Cherry Valley, etc due to the increase In Traffic, noise pollution, air pollution , increase in big rigs, and undesirable aesthetics! NO MORE WAREHOUSES IN A PLACE WE CALL HOME!

Sincerely,
Malulani K. Beale-Short

124
Christina Taylor
From:Nicole Wheelwright
Sent:Monday, October 17, 2022 12:23 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:FW: Public Comments for City Council's Public Hearings of Summit Station - Specific Plan dated on 10/18/2022

- Nicole

From: Sonny Lee
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2022 2:11 AM
To: Nicole Wheelwright
Subject: Public Comments for City Council's Public Hearings of Summit Station - Specific Plan dated on 10/18/2022

Dear Mayer, Councilmen, and Planners,

I’m the owner of 10755 Trouble Ct (APN 407-190-024), Beaumont, CA 92223 adjacent to the east boundary of Summit Station - Specific Plan.

Basically, I strongly support the project because it will bring prosperity to our city and residents and increase employment and income provided that the developer needs to construct some infrastructures contributing to neighbors and City of Beaumont by widening Cherry Valley Blvd to 4-6 lanes with bright street lights, building storm drains, high capacity sewer lines and water lines, underground power lines if possible, plants over-fence with Cypress trees or palms along the boundary lines to beautify the environment, blocking noise of commercial trucks along the boundary lines from neighbors, building nice parks in the open space Planning Area 3, and paving neighbor streets on Fabian Ln and Goodie Ln. Thank you.

Have a blessed day.

Best Regards,

Kuo Ming Lee.

125
Christina Taylor
From:Nicole Wheelwright
Sent:Monday, October 17, 2022 12:23 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:FW: Summit Station
Attachments:Screenshot_20221017-025408_Google.jpg; Screenshot_20221017-025343_Google.jpg

- Nicole

From: Judy Reckard
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2022 3:02 AM
To: Nicole Wheelwright
Subject: Summit Station

I am asking to vote no on any new warehouses in Beaumont. We already have one that was foreced on us by Riverside City Council on Cherry Valley.and another one by Sun Lakes. Warehouses do not belong in residential areas creating noise pollution , gardners have to use battery blowers because of noise pollution, but not trucks! I use to be able to open my windows 18 years ago but truck traffic has increased on the freeway that it is very noisy. The pollution from diesel affects our air quality. Surrouding areas San Bernardino , Riverside, ontatio are seeing the effect of poor air quality . Google San Bernardino and pollution. We moved here to get out of the smog for cleaner air. Vote NO !! Save our beautiful City. VOTE NO!

Sincerely yours,

Judy and Gale Reckard

126
Christina Taylor
From:Nicole Wheelwright
Sent:Monday, October 17, 2022 12:22 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:FW: Summit Station Warehouse

- Nicole
-
-----Original Message-----
From: Carol Draney
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2022 6:37 AM
To: Nicole Wheelwright
Subject: Summit Station Warehouse

We strongly oppose the Summit Station Warehouse! Please, City Council, vote NO on this project. Beaumont already has a Mega Warehouse on Cherry Valley.

Blvd. Don’t allow outside interests destroy our community! Our once peaceful city is becoming a warehouse/trucking community. PLEASE DO NOT ALLOW THIS TO HAPPEN!

Respectfully,

Michael and Carol Draney
1145 Lantana Avenue
Beaumont

127
Christina Taylor
From:Nicole Wheelwright
Sent:Monday, October 17, 2022 12:22 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:FW: Summit Station Warehouse

- Nicole

From: Diane OConnor
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2022 7:22 AM
To: Nicole Wheelwright
Subject: Summit Station Warehouse

Please OPPOSE this measure. It is an abomination. It makes Beaumont look like a city that has no regard for quality of life for its residents or for its environment. It would make Beaumont look like yet another trashed backyard on the 10 freeway!

Diane O'Connor

128
Christina Taylor
From:Nicole Wheelwright
Sent:Monday, October 17, 2022 12:22 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:FW: Summit Station Warehouse
Attachments:Summit Station Development.pdf

- Nicole

From: Brad McDuffee
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2022 7:56 AM
To: Nicole Wheelwright
Subject: Summit Station Warehouse

I am submitting this document to register my opposition to the proposed development.

Thank you,
Brad McDuffee
Solera resident

129
Christina Taylor
From:Nicole Wheelwright
Sent:Monday, October 17, 2022 12:22 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:FW: Summit Station

- Nicole

From: Lauree Feigenbaum
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2022 8:00 AM
To: Nicole Wheelwright
Subject: Summit Station

Dear Councilwoman,
Please represent the people of Beaumont in voting "no" on both the Summit Station and the Sunny Cal Residential. This part of Beaumont is a quiet residential area. The Summit station will take that away from us. As for the Sunny Cal residential, we just don't have the infrastructure in place for it. The entrance would be on Brookside and Brookside is a small one lane each way street that would instantly become a traffic jam that would not only impact residents but also the children trying to get to and from school.

In addition, this is such a slap in the face to those of us who are paying $1500 per year Mello Roos taxes. We were told the Mello Roos tax was to build new streets. In 17 years there has not been one new street built which is why we do not have Brookside ready for a place like Sunny Cal Residential. When we purchased our homes we were told the Mello Roos would be for 10 years. As we approached the ten years, it was changed to 25 years. That is why we have absolutely no trust in our city council that has not only not protected us but has outright scammed us.

Lauree Feigenbaum, resident of Beaumont

130
Christina Taylor
From:Nicole Wheelwright
Sent:Monday, October 17, 2022 12:19 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:FW: Summit warehouse

- Nicole
-
-----Original Message-----
From: Tony Lucchesi
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2022 9:38 AM
To: Nicole Wheelwright
Subject: Summit warehouse

We oppose the building of yet another warehouse. There is one already being built call the gateway on Cherry Valley Blvd.
we will be getting choke by the hundreds of diesel semi trucks already and causing many who rely on good air quality to survive. We don’t need another hundreds of extra trucks. Plus the congestion of traffic as students travel to Beaumont high. It will also cause disease to the students for breathing. So you will be killing our future. Not to mention sports in the area.

Tony and Lisa Lucchesi
1758 N Forest Oaks Dr.,
Beaumont Ca 92223

Sent from my iPhone

131
Christina Taylor
From:Nicole Wheelwright
Sent:Monday, October 17, 2022 12:18 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:FW: Summit Station

- Nicole

From: Susan Stillerman
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2022 9:52 AM
To: Nicole Wheelwright
Subject: Summit Station

We are strongly opposed to the Summit Station warehouse. You are dropping this horror into a community with a large group of homes, three schools and senior citizen housing. The enormous amount of trucks will cause air pollution and traffic congestion.

We are sure there are better places to build this that are less residential. We will not be voting for anyone who does not oppose this horror. We are certain that anyone involved in the construction of the warehouse would be outraged if it came to their own community.

Thank you,
Susan and Philip Stillerman

Sent from Mail for Windows

132
Christina Taylor
From:Nicole Wheelwright
Sent:Monday, October 17, 2022 12:17 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:FW: Summit Station

- Nicole

From: Alfred Barrios
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2022 11:30 AM
To: Nicole Wheelwright
Subject: Summit Station

I oppose the proposal of the Summit Station Project, due to the detrimental effect of Environmental, Logistical and Quality of life issues that will arise from it’s implementation! Sent from Mail for Windows

133
Christina Taylor
From:Nicole Wheelwright
Sent:Monday, October 17, 2022 12:17 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:FW: Summit Station

- Nicole

From: Tiffani Lawyer
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2022 11:33 AM
To: Nicole Wheelwright
Subject: Summit Station

Hello,
Please submit my name as in opposition to the Summit Station Construction bid.

Thank you
Tiffani Lawyer

134
Christina Taylor
From:[email protected]
Sent:Monday, October 17, 2022 11:59 AM
To:Christina Taylor; Carole Kendrick; Nicole Wheelwright; Rey Santos; Lloyd White; David Fenn; Julio Martinez
Subject:Jesus BLANCO Says YES for Beaumont Summit Station Please Vote Yes for the Beaumont Summit Station project!

I am a Beaumont resident who supports Beaumont Summit Station because it provides $78 million in traffic funding that the city needs to fix our roads!

The project includes a commercial center along with three industrial buildings. Summit Station offers more benefits, such as jobs and retail amenities, than the housing plan.

Additionally, I support the project because it:

• Prevents an additional 1,640 daily trips on Brookside Ave • Contributes $10 million to a new 123-acre community park and sports complex • Preserves 30 acres of natural open space buffer between residential neighborhoods • Creates 2,800 new permanent jobs from industrial, retail, and restaurant businesses • Saves 112 million gallons of water per year

I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Jesus BLANCO
92223
[email protected]

135
Christina Taylor
From:[email protected]
Sent:Monday, October 17, 2022 10:26 AM
To:Christina Taylor
Cc:Rey Santos; Lloyd White; David Fenn; Mike Lara; Julio Martinez; Christina Taylor; Carole Kendrick; Nicole Wheelwright
Subject:Please Vote NO on Beaumont Summit Station Warehouse Project Please vote NO for the Beaumont Summit Station WAREHOUSE. I have lived in Banning for 1 1/2 years and feel strongly that Beaumont and the Pass area does not need another warehouse.

I am against the plan because it:
· Builds a 2 million square foot warehouse and the Developer continues to put out false advertising to unsuspecting residents that doesn’t even mention the warehouse · It’s projected to add over 800 trucks a day without having improved our highway interchanges in advance · Will impact our environment in a dramatically negative way · The majority of jobs offered are low paying, high turnover with no benefits. · Data from other cities nearby show that warehouses will negatively affect property values.

I want this to be read into the record at the October 18th City Council meeting.

Denis Marin
Zip Code 92220

136
Christina Taylor
From:Sonia Nigro
Sent:Monday, October 17, 2022 10:19 AM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:BEAUMONT SUMMIT STATION
As a resident of the Banning/Beaumont area, I am UNEQUIVOCALLY OPPOSED to the massive warehouse being proposed.

The Banning/Beaumont area has potential for more appropriate development but a warehouse should NOT be considered.

Respectfully,
Sonia and Ron Nigro
4888 St Croix Way, Banning, CA 92220
914-629-6270

137
Christina Taylor
From:Kelly Lucia
Sent:Monday, October 17, 2022 9:38 AM
To:Greybar, Andrew; Christina Taylor; Elizabeth Gibbs
Cc:Bonnie Johnson; Virgilio, Cristina; Tarikere, Pranesh; Ostoich, Mark; Cano, Kari; Perez, Aldo; Mike Thornton; Justin Schlaefli; Michael Thornton - City Engineer Subject:Re: FW: Beaumont Summit Station - City of Calimesa Comments on Notice of Availability
Attachments:City of Calimesa_FEIR Comment Letter_Beaumont Summit Station_10.3.2022.pdf Good morning Andrew and Christina,

We reviewed the packet for tomorrow's hearing and noticed that our FEIR comment letter dated 10/3/2022 (attached here) is not part of the packet. We will be submitting a statement to be read into the record for the hearing with our comment letter attached. Per your email below, we expected to receive some additional information last week. However, with the hearing upon us, we want to ensure that the entitlement and environmental documents appropriately address the City's concerns. Please let us know if we should still expect additional information.

Thank you,

Kelly Lucia, M. URP
Planning Director

Cell 909.809.8778 (preferred)
Office 909.795.9801 ext. 229
Email
[email protected]

From: Greybar, Andrew
Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2022 3:01 PM
To: Bonnie Johnson
Cc: Virgilio, Cristina ; Tarikere, Pranesh ;
Ostoich, Mark ; Kelly Lucia ; Cano, Kari
; Perez, Aldo ; Mike Thornton
; Justin Schlaefli ; Michael Thornton - City Engineer

Subject: Re: FW: Beaumont Summit Station - City of Calimesa Comments on Notice of Availability

Bonnie - so that I don't let this hang out there too long, I just wanted to give you a heads up that we're working on responding to each point, flushing out some of the finer points of our contribution and hope to have a decent response to each point by the end of the week.

138
It suggests to me that we still have some work to do to back up the contribution and mechanism for it in the agreement, but our response should give you enough to push to the next step.

Please look out for our email by the end of the week. Thanks!

Andrew Greybar
Senior Project Manager
EQT Exeter
M +1 708-341-9821
5060 N 40th St Suite 108
Phoenix, AZ 85018
[email protected]

On Tue, Oct 4, 2022 at 3:09 PM Bonnie Johnson wrote:

Hi Andrew,

My apologies for the delay. We have been reviewing your FEIR response to comments concurrent with this review. The Comment letter was submitted yesterday. In order to finalize our comments on the Participation Agreement, I need clarification/assistance on a few things:
 Please explain the scope of Cherry Valley Interchange improvements meant by “Ramps” as the proposed agreement refers to? The Improvements also include ROW acquisition, bridge, realignment of Calimesa Blvd, etc.
 Please explain how the fair share will be calculated. Our understanding of this will be key to reaching an agreement.
 Please see City comments in the recently submitted (and attached) FEIR Comment letter. Several of these comments refer to the fair share calculation (comments 6 through 11).  Agreement section 2. “Contribution Toward Interchange”: this section, although short, is confusing and vague. How is the “TUMF portion” defined? Who’s “TUMF portion” does that refer to? What is meant by “other programmed funding”? What does “in immediately available funds” mean? How does all this measure up against Exeter’s representation at the PC Hearing that the project would pay a substantial amount toward the Interchange to ensure completion ($40 million?? – I cannot readily recall the exact amount that was represented).

Thanks so much for working with the City toward an amicable agreement for all parties. We will be able to finalize our comments once we have received the requested clarification.

139
Bonnie

Bonnie Johnson
City Manager
City of Calimesa
(909)795-9801

From: Greybar, Andrew
Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2022 2:08 PM
To: Kelly Lucia
Cc: Virgilio, Cristina ; Tarikere, Pranesh ;
Ostoich, Mark ; Cano, Kari ; Perez, Aldo
; Bonnie Johnson ; Mike Thornton
; Justin Schlaefli
Subject: Re: FW: Beaumont Summit Station - City of Calimesa Comments on Notice of Availability

Kelly and Team - following up on this email. Is there anything you need from us to get this review underway and move toward a final agreement?

Thanks,

Andrew Greybar
Senior Project Manager
EQT Exeter
M +1 708-341-9821
5060 N 40th St Suite 108
Phoenix, AZ 85018
[email protected]

140

On Thu, Sep 8, 2022 at 2:28 PM Greybar, Andrew wrote:

Kelly - please see attached draft of our Participation agreement for the interchange.

Below is a link to the Traffic and Transportation section of our EIR https://www.beaumontca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/37644/415-Transportation

Here is a link to the Appendix K TIA and VMT
https://www.beaumontca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/37620/Appendix-K-Traffic

Can you and your team please review and provide a redline or comments to the attached documents? Let me know if you'd like to get on a call to discuss - happy to do that at your earliest convenience.

Thanks,

Andrew Greybar
Senior Project Manager
EQT Exeter
M +1 708-341-9821
5060 N 40th St Suite 108
Phoenix, AZ 85018
[email protected]

On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 3:52 PM Kelly Lucia wrote:

Hi Andrew,

141

Yes, we did hear about the continuation. We don't have a template agreement, so please feel free to take the first crack at drafting one for our review. If there is going to be a TUMF agreement, we assume that will go through the City of Beaumont. However, we would be happy to provide some improvement descriptions if needed. If the project intends to go over and above TUMF (as discussed during the Planning Commission hearing) we would request that Beaumont memorialize the commitment in a project condition of approval, to be followed with a MOU. Please let us know if any clarifications are needed, we would be happy to discuss further.

Thank you,

Kelly Lucia, M. URP
Planning Manager

Cell 909.809.8778 (preferred)
Office 909.795.9801 ext. 229
Email
[email protected]

From: Greybar, Andrew
Sent: Monday, July 18, 2022 9:39 PM
To: Kelly Lucia
Cc: Virgilio, Cristina ; Tarikere, Pranesh ;
Ostoich, Mark ; Cano, Kari ; Perez, Aldo
; Bonnie Johnson ; Mike Thornton
; Justin Schlaefli
Subject: Re: FW: Beaumont Summit Station - City of Calimesa Comments on Notice of Availability

Kelly - sorry for the delay, you may have heard but we are continued to the August Beaumont Council meeting.

142
In conferring with Mark Ostoich, we're wondering if there is a template agreement you've used with a developer to contribute to the interchange improvements, or any direction you can provide so that we have a framework for drafting it ourselves?

Thanks,

Andrew Greybar
Senior Project Manager
EQT Exeter
M +1 708-341-9821
5060 N 40th St Suite 108
Phoenix, AZ 85018
[email protected]

On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 3:13 PM Kelly Lucia wrote:

Hi Andrew,

Here is the information I received back from the City Engineer. Also, do you have any update on the draft agreement(s)?

Question: Information about the improvement and their status and costs

Response: Cherry Valley Interchange shall include ultimate interchange construction that includes a diverging diamond interchange and related work including realignment of Calimesa Boulevard. The City, in collaboration with the County of Riverside, has completed the Project Study Report step with Caltrans and is just about complete with Project Approval and Environmental Document (PA&ED) step – the Environmental Document has been circulated and comments have been received. Plans, Specifications, and Estimates step has commenced. It will be followed by right-of-way acquisition and construction.

Thank you,

143

Kelly Lucia, M. URP
Planning Manager

Cell 909.809.8778 (preferred)
Office 909.795.9801 ext. 229
Email
[email protected]

From: Greybar, Andrew
Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2022 2:34 PM
To: Kelly Lucia
Cc: Virgilio, Cristina ; Tarikere, Pranesh ;
Ostoich, Mark ; Cano, Kari ; Perez, Aldo
; Bonnie Johnson ; Mike Thornton
; Justin Schlaefli
Subject: Re: FW: Beaumont Summit Station - City of Calimesa Comments on Notice of Availability

Really appreciate all the info. We'll take a look at the agreements you linked and look out for the intel you mentioned from Mike Thornton soon.

Thanks again and we'll work internally to get the first steps of agreement going. Please let us know if you need anything in the meantime!

Andrew Greybar
Senior Project Manager
EQT Exeter
M +1 708-341-9821
5060 N 40th St Suite 108
Phoenix, AZ 85018
[email protected]

On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 9:21 AM Kelly Lucia wrote:

Good morning Andrew and team,

Please see the below responses to your questions. We look forward to working together.

144
 Parties to be involved in crafting and negotiating the agreement (feel free to send an intro email)
 The parties to be involved are Bonnie Johnson (City Manager), myself (Planning Manager), Mike Thornton (City Engineer), Justin Schlaefli (City Traffic Engineer) (all copied here), and the City Attorney's office. Calimesa staff will loop the City Attorney's office as appropriate.
 Information about the improvements and their status and costs  Mike Thornton to provide.
 Agreements with adjacent developers for the same improvements  We are aware that the I-10 logistics (Shopoff) project is conditioned by Riverside County to contribute to interim and ultimate improvements at I- 10/Cherry Valley Blvd. Those conditions can be found here:
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fo/xeu38zztgmggfkd0mwekb/h?dl=0&rlkey=o 4pmnowqsuyvgffrjyyv6ncvn. There may be other agreements related to the Shopoff project, which can be obtained from the project representatives.

There is also the CV Communities settlement agreement and TUMF agreement related to the former project. We suspect that new Agreements will replace prior ones, potentially.
 Any guidance or next steps the City of Calimesa would like to take as we move toward an agreement
 When reaching out to our team, please ensure to copy all staff included here (Bonnie, myself, Mike, and Justin) so that we all stay in the loop.

Thank you,

Kelly Lucia, M. URP
Planning Manager

Cell 909.809.8778 (preferred)
Office 909.795.9801 ext. 229
Email
[email protected]

From: Greybar, Andrew
Sent: Wednesday, June 8, 2022 10:02 AM
To: Kelly Lucia
Cc: Virgilio, Cristina ; Tarikere, Pranesh ;

145
Ostoich, Mark ; Cano, Kari ; Perez, Aldo

Subject: Re: FW: Beaumont Summit Station - City of Calimesa Comments on Notice of Availability

Kelly,

We received your letter through the City of Beaumont and wanted to express our interest in entering into an agreement with the City of Calimesa toward the described traffic improvements. Copied is our fantastic team of experts that will help toward that end. We are meeting internally to prepare some questions and comments that will help in drafting the agreement and plan to prepare the first draft for the City of Calimesa's review soon.

Could you please provide us with as much of the information below as possible:
 Parties to be involved in crafting and negotiating the agreement (feel free to send an intro email)  Information about the improvements and their status and costs  Agreements with adjacent developers for the same improvements  Any guidance or next steps the City of Calimesa would like to take as we move toward an agreement
Thanks,

Andrew Greybar
Senior Project Manager
EQT Exeter
M +1 708-341-9821
5060 N 40th St Suite 108
Phoenix, AZ 85018
[email protected]

On Mon, Jun 6, 2022 at 10:32 AM Cano, Kari wrote:

Hello all,

Please review the letter we received from the City of Calimesa.

Thank you,
Kari

Kari Cano
Kimley-Horn | 3880 Lemon Street, Suite 420, Riverside, CA 92501 Direct: 951-543-9869 | Mobile Phone: 951-212-3848 |
Connect with us: Twitter | LinkedIn | Facebook | Instagram | Kimley-Horn.com Celebrating 14 years as one of FORTUNE’s 100 Best Companies to Work For

From: Christina Taylor
Sent: Monday, June 6, 2022 9:56 AM
To: Cano, Kari ; Harry, Jennifer
Cc: Carole Kendrick
Subject: FW: Beaumont Summit Station - City of Calimesa Comments on Notice of Availability

FYI from Calimesa

146

CHRISTINA TAYLOR
Deputy City Manager

City of Beaumont
550 E. 6th Street, Beaumont, Ca 92223
Desk (951) 572-3212
BeaumontCa.gov
Facebook | Twitter | Instagram | YouTube

#ACITYELEVATED

From: Kelly Lucia
Sent: Monday, June 06, 2022 9:26 AM
To: Christina Taylor
Subject: Beaumont Summit Station - City of Calimesa Comments on Notice of Availability

Good morning Christina,

Please find attached the City of Calimesa's comments on the Notice of Availability for the Beaumont Summit Station Draft EIR. A hard copy of the letter is also being sent to City Hall to your attention. We look forward to continue working with you on this project.

Thank you,

Kelly Lucia, M. URP
Planning Manager

Cell 909.809.8778 (preferred)
Office 909.795.9801 ext. 229
Email
[email protected]

147
This message and any attachment(s) hereto are confidential and may be privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that you have received this message in error and that you must not - in whole or in part - review, copy, distribute, retain copies or disclose the contents of this message or any attachments hereto. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this message and any attachment from your system.

This message and any attachment(s) hereto are confidential and may be privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that you have received this message in error and that you must not - in whole or in part - review, copy, distribute, retain copies or disclose the contents of this message or any attachments hereto. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this message and any attachment from your system.

This message and any attachment(s) hereto are confidential and may be privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that you have received this message in error and that you must not - in whole or in part - review, copy, distribute, retain copies or disclose the contents of this message or any attachments hereto. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this message and any attachment from your system.

This message and any attachment(s) hereto are confidential and may be privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that you have received this message in error and that you must not - in whole or in part - review, copy, distribute, retain copies or disclose the contents of this message or any attachments hereto. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this message and any attachment from your system.

This message and any attachment(s) hereto are confidential and may be privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that you have received this message in error and that you must not - in whole or in part - review, copy, distribute, retain copies or disclose the contents of this message or any attachments hereto. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this message and any attachment from your system.

148
Christina Taylor
From:Cano, Kari
Sent:Monday, October 17, 2022 8:45 AM
To:Christina Taylor; Harry, Jennifer; Greybar, Andrew; Virgilio, Cristina Cc:Carole Kendrick
Subject:RE: City Council Meeting 10-18-22 6PM Public Hearing Item H.1 Beaumont Summit Station Specific Plan EIR
Received. Thank you Christina.

Kari Cano
Kimley-Horn | 3880 Lemon Street, Suite 420, Riverside, CA 92501 Direct: 951-543-9869 | Mobile Phone: 951-212-3848 |
Connect with us: Twitter | LinkedIn | Facebook | Instagram | Kimley-Horn.com Celebrating 14 years as one of FORTUNE’s 100 Best Companies to Work For

From: Christina Taylor
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2022 8:32 AM
To: Cano, Kari ; Harry, Jennifer ; Greybar, Andrew
; Virgilio, Cristina
Cc: Carole Kendrick
Subject: FW: City Council Meeting 10-18-22 6PM Public Hearing Item H.1 Beaumont Summit Station Specific Plan EIR

FYI attached and below

CHRISTINA TAYLOR
Deputy City Manager

City of Beaumont
550 E. 6th Street, Beaumont, Ca 92223
Desk (951) 572-3212
BeaumontCa.gov
Facebook | Twitter | Instagram | YouTube

#ACITYELEVATED

149
From: steven piepkorn
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2022 7:17 AM
To: Christina Taylor
Subject: City Council Meeting 10-18-22 6PM Public Hearing Item H.1 Beaumont Summit Station Specific Plan EIR

To whom it may concern,

Attached to this email and below are public comments on behalf of Golden State Environmental Justice Alliance. The attachment contains further comments than below and is not duplicative of the below comments. These comments are submitted to the City Council to be included in the record for the City Council's consideration regarding The Beaumont Summit Station Specific Plan EIR, at the City Council meeting October 18, 2022 at 6PM Public Hearing Agenda Item H.1.

For clarification purposes, only the highlighted yellow portion of the body of this email is the public comment to be read aloud during the meeting as stated in the agenda packet.

Good evening, my name is Steven Piepkorn and I’m with the Golden State Environmental Justice Alliance. We submitted a comment letter to the Environmental Impact Report. Our letter identified several deficiencies with the EIR. The deficiencies include but are not limited to, project description, , air quality, energy, greenhouse gas emissions, land use and planning, population and housing, and transportation/traffic.

During these turbulent times, we as citizens expect and deserve our local government’s elected and appointed officials to protect us from environmental and social injustice, to aid in the preservation and rehabilitation of the environment in which we all share, and to ensure accountability and responsibility in regard to the environmental decisions they may make.

We stand by our comment letter, and believe the EIR is flawed and must be redrafted and recirculated for public review. In closing we call on this council to be a leader on the aforementioned issues, and be the first line of defense for our citizenry and environment. Only by working together can we continue to be excellent stewards of our environment, outstanding stewards to our citizens and each other. Thank You.

Please confirm receipt of this email.

Thank You,

Steven Piepkorn

150
Christina Taylor
From:steven piepkorn
Sent:Monday, October 17, 2022 7:17 AM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:City Council Meeting 10-18-22 6PM Public Hearing Item H.1 Beaumont Summit Station Specific Plan EIR
Attachments:2022 Beaumont Summit Station EIR CC Meeting 10-18-22.pdf To whom it may concern,

Attached to this email and below are public comments on behalf of Golden State Environmental Justice Alliance. The attachment contains further comments than below and is not duplicative of the below comments. These comments are submitted to the City Council to be included in the record for the City Council's consideration regarding The Beaumont Summit Station Specific Plan EIR, at the City Council meeting October 18, 2022 at 6PM Public Hearing Agenda Item H.1.

For clarification purposes, only the highlighted yellow portion of the body of this email is the public comment to be read aloud during the meeting as stated in the agenda packet.

Good evening, my name is Steven Piepkorn and I’m with the Golden State Environmental Justice Alliance. We submitted a comment letter to the Environmental Impact Report. Our letter identified several deficiencies with the EIR. The deficiencies include but are not limited to, project description, , air quality, energy, greenhouse gas emissions, land use and planning, population and housing, and transportation/traffic.

During these turbulent times, we as citizens expect and deserve our local government’s elected and appointed officials to protect us from environmental and social injustice, to aid in the preservation and rehabilitation of the environment in which we all share, and to ensure accountability and responsibility in regard to the environmental decisions they may make.

We stand by our comment letter, and believe the EIR is flawed and must be redrafted and recirculated for public review. In closing we call on this council to be a leader on the aforementioned issues, and be the first line of defense for our citizenry and environment. Only by working together can we continue to be excellent stewards of our environment, outstanding stewards to our citizens and each other. Thank You.

Please confirm receipt of this email.

Thank You,

Steven Piepkorn

151
Christina Taylor
From:[email protected]
Sent:Monday, October 17, 2022 12:25 AM
To:Christina Taylor; Carole Kendrick; Nicole Wheelwright; Rey Santos; Lloyd White; David Fenn; Mike Lara; Julio Martinez
Subject:Mike Hernandez Says YES for Beaumont Summit Station Please Vote Yes for the Beaumont Summit Station project!

I am a Beaumont resident who supports Beaumont Summit Station because it provides $78 million in traffic funding that the city needs to fix our roads!

The project includes a commercial center along with three industrial buildings. Summit Station offers more benefits, such as jobs and retail amenities, than the housing plan.

Additionally, I support the project because it:

• Prevents an additional 1,640 daily trips on Brookside Ave • Contributes $10 million to a new 123-acre community park and sports complex • Preserves 30 acres of natural open space buffer between residential neighborhoods • Creates 2,800 new permanent jobs from industrial, retail, and restaurant businesses • Saves 112 million gallons of water per year

I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Mike Hernandez
92223
[email protected]

152
Christina Taylor
From:[email protected]
Sent:Sunday, October 16, 2022 9:49 PM
To:Christina Taylor; Carole Kendrick; Nicole Wheelwright; Rey Santos; Lloyd White; David Fenn; Mike Lara; Julio Martinez
Subject:Meandra Hartman Says YES for Beaumont Summit Station Please Vote Yes for the Beaumont Summit Station project!

I am a Beaumont resident who supports Beaumont Summit Station because it provides $78 million in traffic funding that the city needs to fix our roads!

The project includes a commercial center along with three industrial buildings. Summit Station offers more benefits, such as jobs and retail amenities, than the housing plan.

Additionally, I support the project because it:

• Prevents an additional 1,640 daily trips on Brookside Ave • Contributes $10 million to a new 123-acre community park and sports complex • Preserves 30 acres of natural open space buffer between residential neighborhoods • Creates 2,800 new permanent jobs from industrial, retail, and restaurant businesses • Saves 112 million gallons of water per year

I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Meandra Hartman
92223
[email protected]

153
Christina Taylor
From:[email protected]
Sent:Sunday, October 16, 2022 9:30 PM
To:Christina Taylor; Carole Kendrick; Nicole Wheelwright; Rey Santos; Lloyd White; David Fenn; Mike Lara; Julio Martinez
Subject:Sam Balan Says YES for Beaumont Summit Station
Please Vote Yes for the Beaumont Summit Station project!

I am a Beaumont resident who supports Beaumont Summit Station because it provides $78 million in traffic funding that the city needs to fix our roads!

The project includes a commercial center along with three industrial buildings. Summit Station offers more benefits, such as jobs and retail amenities, than the housing plan.

Additionally, I support the project because it:

• Prevents an additional 1,640 daily trips on Brookside Ave • Contributes $10 million to a new 123-acre community park and sports complex • Preserves 30 acres of natural open space buffer between residential neighborhoods • Creates 2,800 new permanent jobs from industrial, retail, and restaurant businesses • Saves 112 million gallons of water per year

I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Sam Balan
92223
[email protected]

154
Christina Taylor
From:[email protected]
Sent:Sunday, October 16, 2022 8:52 PM
To:Christina Taylor; Carole Kendrick; Nicole Wheelwright; Rey Santos; Lloyd White; David Fenn; Mike Lara; Julio Martinez
Subject:Nancy Ayala Says YES for Beaumont Summit Station Please Vote Yes for the Beaumont Summit Station project!

I am a Beaumont resident who supports Beaumont Summit Station because it provides $78 million in traffic funding that the city needs to fix our roads!

The project includes a commercial center along with three industrial buildings. Summit Station offers more benefits, such as jobs and retail amenities, than the housing plan.

Additionally, I support the project because it:

• Prevents an additional 1,640 daily trips on Brookside Ave • Contributes $10 million to a new 123-acre community park and sports complex • Preserves 30 acres of natural open space buffer between residential neighborhoods • Creates 2,800 new permanent jobs from industrial, retail, and restaurant businesses • Saves 112 million gallons of water per year

I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Nancy Ayala
92223
[email protected]

155
Christina Taylor
From:[email protected]
Sent:Sunday, October 16, 2022 8:26 PM
To:Christina Taylor; Carole Kendrick; Nicole Wheelwright; Rey Santos; Lloyd White; David Fenn; Mike Lara; Julio Martinez
Subject:Kate McLane Says YES for Beaumont Summit Station Please Vote Yes for the Beaumont Summit Station project!

I am a Beaumont resident who supports Beaumont Summit Station because it provides $78 million in traffic funding that the city needs to fix our roads!

The project includes a commercial center along with three industrial buildings. Summit Station offers more benefits, such as jobs and retail amenities, than the housing plan.

Additionally, I support the project because it:

• Prevents an additional 1,640 daily trips on Brookside Ave • Contributes $10 million to a new 123-acre community park and sports complex • Preserves 30 acres of natural open space buffer between residential neighborhoods • Creates 2,800 new permanent jobs from industrial, retail, and restaurant businesses • Saves 112 million gallons of water per year

I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Kate McLane
92223
[email protected]

156
Christina Taylor
From:[email protected]
Sent:Sunday, October 16, 2022 8:05 PM
To:Christina Taylor; Carole Kendrick; Nicole Wheelwright; Rey Santos; Lloyd White; David Fenn; Mike Lara; Julio Martinez
Subject:Konstantin Titov Says YES for Beaumont Summit Station Please Vote Yes for the Beaumont Summit Station project!

I am a Beaumont resident who supports Beaumont Summit Station because it provides $78 million in traffic funding that the city needs to fix our roads!

The project includes a commercial center along with three industrial buildings. Summit Station offers more benefits, such as jobs and retail amenities, than the housing plan.

Additionally, I support the project because it:

• Prevents an additional 1,640 daily trips on Brookside Ave • Contributes $10 million to a new 123-acre community park and sports complex • Preserves 30 acres of natural open space buffer between residential neighborhoods • Creates 2,800 new permanent jobs from industrial, retail, and restaurant businesses • Saves 112 million gallons of water per year

I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Konstantin Titov
92223
[email protected]

157
Christina Taylor
From:[email protected]
Sent:Sunday, October 16, 2022 8:02 PM
To:Christina Taylor; Carole Kendrick; Nicole Wheelwright; Rey Santos; Lloyd White; David Fenn; Mike Lara; Julio Martinez
Subject:Elena Titova Says YES for Beaumont Summit Station Please Vote Yes for the Beaumont Summit Station project!

I am a Beaumont resident who supports Beaumont Summit Station because it provides $78 million in traffic funding that the city needs to fix our roads!

The project includes a commercial center along with three industrial buildings. Summit Station offers more benefits, such as jobs and retail amenities, than the housing plan.

Additionally, I support the project because it:

• Prevents an additional 1,640 daily trips on Brookside Ave • Contributes $10 million to a new 123-acre community park and sports complex • Preserves 30 acres of natural open space buffer between residential neighborhoods • Creates 2,800 new permanent jobs from industrial, retail, and restaurant businesses • Saves 112 million gallons of water per year

I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Elena Titova
92223
[email protected]

158
Christina Taylor
From:[email protected]
Sent:Sunday, October 16, 2022 6:16 PM
To:Christina Taylor; Carole Kendrick; Nicole Wheelwright; Rey Santos; Lloyd White; David Fenn; Mike Lara; Julio Martinez
Subject:Sara Avelar Says YES for Beaumont Summit Station Please Vote Yes for the Beaumont Summit Station project!

I am a Beaumont resident who supports Beaumont Summit Station because it provides $78 million in traffic funding that the city needs to fix our roads!

The project includes a commercial center along with three industrial buildings. Summit Station offers more benefits, such as jobs and retail amenities, than the housing plan.

Additionally, I support the project because it:

• Prevents an additional 1,640 daily trips on Brookside Ave • Contributes $10 million to a new 123-acre community park and sports complex • Preserves 30 acres of natural open space buffer between residential neighborhoods • Creates 2,800 new permanent jobs from industrial, retail, and restaurant businesses • Saves 112 million gallons of water per year

I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Sara Avelar
92223
[email protected]

159
Christina Taylor
From:[email protected]
Sent:Sunday, October 16, 2022 3:22 PM
To:Christina Taylor; Carole Kendrick; Nicole Wheelwright; Rey Santos; Lloyd White; David Fenn; Mike Lara; Julio Martinez
Subject:Beverly Monroe Says YES for Beaumont Summit Station Please Vote Yes for the Beaumont Summit Station project!

I am a Beaumont resident who supports Beaumont Summit Station because it provides $78 million in traffic funding that the city needs to fix our roads!

The project includes a commercial center along with three industrial buildings. Summit Station offers more benefits, such as jobs and retail amenities, than the housing plan.

Additionally, I support the project because it:

• Prevents an additional 1,640 daily trips on Brookside Ave • Contributes $10 million to a new 123-acre community park and sports complex • Preserves 30 acres of natural open space buffer between residential neighborhoods • Creates 2,800 new permanent jobs from industrial, retail, and restaurant businesses • Saves 112 million gallons of water per year

I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Beverly Monroe
92223
[email protected]

160
Christina Taylor
From:[email protected]
Sent:Sunday, October 16, 2022 1:54 PM
To:Christina Taylor; Carole Kendrick; Nicole Wheelwright; Rey Santos; Lloyd White; David Fenn; Mike Lara; Julio Martinez
Subject:Patrick Martinez Says YES for Beaumont Summit Station Please Vote Yes for the Beaumont Summit Station project!

I am a Beaumont resident who supports Beaumont Summit Station because it provides $78 million in traffic funding that the city needs to fix our roads!

The project includes a commercial center along with three industrial buildings. Summit Station offers more benefits, such as jobs and retail amenities, than the housing plan.

Additionally, I support the project because it:

• Prevents an additional 1,640 daily trips on Brookside Ave • Contributes $10 million to a new 123-acre community park and sports complex • Preserves 30 acres of natural open space buffer between residential neighborhoods • Creates 2,800 new permanent jobs from industrial, retail, and restaurant businesses • Saves 112 million gallons of water per year

I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Patrick Martinez

[email protected]

161
Christina Taylor
From:Mary Anderson
Sent:Sunday, October 16, 2022 12:44 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:Summit Station
Please count our ABSOLUTE OBJECTION to the proposed Summit Station in our neighborhood!! Thanks for your assistance with this matter.

Mary & Robert Anderson
Solera Residents

162
Christina Taylor
From:[email protected]
Sent:Sunday, October 16, 2022 11:53 AM
To:Christina Taylor; Carole Kendrick; Nicole Wheelwright; Rey Santos; Lloyd White; David Fenn; Mike Lara; Julio Martinez
Subject:Juan Lobo Says YES for Beaumont Summit Station
Please Vote Yes for the Beaumont Summit Station project!

I am a Beaumont resident who supports Beaumont Summit Station because it provides $78 million in traffic funding that the city needs to fix our roads!

The project includes a commercial center along with three industrial buildings. Summit Station offers more benefits, such as jobs and retail amenities, than the housing plan.

Additionally, I support the project because it:

• Prevents an additional 1,640 daily trips on Brookside Ave • Contributes $10 million to a new 123-acre community park and sports complex • Preserves 30 acres of natural open space buffer between residential neighborhoods • Creates 2,800 new permanent jobs from industrial, retail, and restaurant businesses • Saves 112 million gallons of water per year

I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Juan Lobo
92223
[email protected]

163
Christina Taylor
From:Jane Gentry
Sent:Sunday, October 16, 2022 10:22 AM
To:Christina Taylor
Cc:Mike Lara; Rey Santos; Julio Martinez; Lloyd White; David Fenn Subject:Beaumont Summit Station Warehouse Project - Please Vote No Good Evening City Council Members,

I have lived in Beaumont for almost five years.

As I was researching the Beaumont Summit Station and its impact to the community I felt strongly that Beaumont and the Pass area do not need another warehouse.

I am against the plan for a number of reasons and will share a few with you.

1. It adds more than 800 trucks a day to our area which will increase pollution and significantly increase traffic.

2. The infrastructure for the increased traffic is not currently in place.

3. The majority of jobs to be offered appear to be low paying and will not help people who are seeking jobs that offer realistic living wages.

4. All the reasons stated in the letter written by Mary Daniel dated May 1, 2022 in opposition to this warehouse.

City Council members, please vote NO for the Beaumont Summit Station.

Thank you for serving our community.

I want this email read into the record at the City Council meeting.

Jane Gentry
Beaumont Resident
92223

164
Christina Taylor
From:[email protected]
Sent:Sunday, October 16, 2022 10:18 AM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:Opposition to Summit Station
We support the Resolution OPPOSING the Beaumont Summit Station Warehouse for the following reasons:

1. Close proximity to diesel 18-wheel trucks. A major health concern for Seniors living nearby at Solera Del Webb.

2. A warehouse in proximity to a Over-55 Retirement Community could result in significant reductions of the value of homes.

3. Sound factors from "big rigs" would produce an environmental noise factor that could lead to later health problems throughout the community. See, article - "The Effects of Noise on Health" - Harvard Medicine Review - May 2, 2022.

We urge the City Council to vote NO on this Summit Station.

Mel & Cecilia Irwin

165
Christina Taylor
From:[email protected]
Sent:Sunday, October 16, 2022 9:18 AM
To:Christina Taylor; Carole Kendrick; Nicole Wheelwright; Rey Santos; Lloyd White; David Fenn; Mike Lara; Julio Martinez
Subject:Anna Pacleb Says YES for Beaumont Summit Station Please Vote Yes for the Beaumont Summit Station project!

I am a Beaumont resident who supports Beaumont Summit Station because it provides $78 million in traffic funding that the city needs to fix our roads!

The project includes a commercial center along with three industrial buildings. Summit Station offers more benefits, such as jobs and retail amenities, than the housing plan.

Additionally, I support the project because it:

• Prevents an additional 1,640 daily trips on Brookside Ave • Contributes $10 million to a new 123-acre community park and sports complex • Preserves 30 acres of natural open space buffer between residential neighborhoods • Creates 2,800 new permanent jobs from industrial, retail, and restaurant businesses • Saves 112 million gallons of water per year

I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Anna Pacleb
92223
[email protected]

166
Christina Taylor
From:[email protected]
Sent:Saturday, October 15, 2022 10:03 PM
To:Christina Taylor; Carole Kendrick; Nicole Wheelwright; Rey Santos; Lloyd White; David Fenn; Mike Lara; Julio Martinez
Subject:Ben Andrade Says YES for Beaumont Summit Station Please Vote Yes for the Beaumont Summit Station project!

I am a Beaumont resident who supports Beaumont Summit Station because it provides $78 million in traffic funding that the city needs to fix our roads!

The project includes a commercial center along with three industrial buildings. Summit Station offers more benefits, such as jobs and retail amenities, than the housing plan.

Additionally, I support the project because it:

• Prevents an additional 1,640 daily trips on Brookside Ave • Contributes $10 million to a new 123-acre community park and sports complex • Preserves 30 acres of natural open space buffer between residential neighborhoods • Creates 2,800 new permanent jobs from industrial, retail, and restaurant businesses • Saves 112 million gallons of water per year

I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Ben Andrade
92223
[email protected]

167
Christina Taylor
From:[email protected]
Sent:Saturday, October 15, 2022 8:55 PM
To:Christina Taylor; Carole Kendrick; Nicole Wheelwright; Rey Santos; Lloyd White; David Fenn; Mike Lara; Julio Martinez
Subject:Dixon Gayer Says YES for Beaumont Summit Station Please Vote Yes for the Beaumont Summit Station project!

I am a Beaumont resident who supports Beaumont Summit Station because it provides $78 million in traffic funding that the city needs to fix our roads!

The project includes a commercial center along with three industrial buildings. Summit Station offers more benefits, such as jobs and retail amenities, than the housing plan.

Additionally, I support the project because it:

• Prevents an additional 1,640 daily trips on Brookside Ave • Contributes $10 million to a new 123-acre community park and sports complex • Preserves 30 acres of natural open space buffer between residential neighborhoods • Creates 2,800 new permanent jobs from industrial, retail, and restaurant businesses • Saves 112 million gallons of water per year

I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Dixon Gayer
92224
[email protected]

168
Christina Taylor
From:[email protected]
Sent:Saturday, October 15, 2022 6:34 PM
To:Christina Taylor; Carole Kendrick; Nicole Wheelwright; Rey Santos; Lloyd White; David Fenn; Mike Lara; Julio Martinez
Subject:Raymond Spiess Says YES for Beaumont Summit Station Please Vote Yes for the Beaumont Summit Station project!

I am a Beaumont resident who supports Beaumont Summit Station because it provides $78 million in traffic funding that the city needs to fix our roads!

The project includes a commercial center along with three industrial buildings. Summit Station offers more benefits, such as jobs and retail amenities, than the housing plan.

Additionally, I support the project because it:

• Prevents an additional 1,640 daily trips on Brookside Ave • Contributes $10 million to a new 123-acre community park and sports complex • Preserves 30 acres of natural open space buffer between residential neighborhoods • Creates 2,800 new permanent jobs from industrial, retail, and restaurant businesses • Saves 112 million gallons of water per year

I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Raymond Spiess
92223
[email protected]

169
Christina Taylor
From:[email protected]
Sent:Saturday, October 15, 2022 3:29 PM
To:Christina Taylor; Carole Kendrick; Nicole Wheelwright; Rey Santos; Lloyd White; David Fenn; Mike Lara; Julio Martinez
Subject:Darryl Robertson Says YES for Beaumont Summit Station Please Vote Yes for the Beaumont Summit Station project!

I am a Beaumont resident who supports Beaumont Summit Station because it provides $78 million in traffic funding that the city needs to fix our roads!

The project includes a commercial center along with three industrial buildings. Summit Station offers more benefits, such as jobs and retail amenities, than the housing plan.

Additionally, I support the project because it:

• Prevents an additional 1,640 daily trips on Brookside Ave • Contributes $10 million to a new 123-acre community park and sports complex • Preserves 30 acres of natural open space buffer between residential neighborhoods • Creates 2,800 new permanent jobs from industrial, retail, and restaurant businesses • Saves 112 million gallons of water per year

I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Darryl Robertson
92223
[email protected]

170
Christina Taylor
From:[email protected]
Sent:Saturday, October 15, 2022 2:21 PM
To:Christina Taylor; Carole Kendrick; Nicole Wheelwright; Rey Santos; Lloyd White; David Fenn; Mike Lara; Julio Martinez
Subject:Arlene Tamayo Says YES for Beaumont Summit Station Please Vote Yes for the Beaumont Summit Station project!

I am a Beaumont resident who supports Beaumont Summit Station because it provides $78 million in traffic funding that the city needs to fix our roads!

The project includes a commercial center along with three industrial buildings. Summit Station offers more benefits, such as jobs and retail amenities, than the housing plan.

Additionally, I support the project because it:

• Prevents an additional 1,640 daily trips on Brookside Ave • Contributes $10 million to a new 123-acre community park and sports complex • Preserves 30 acres of natural open space buffer between residential neighborhoods • Creates 2,800 new permanent jobs from industrial, retail, and restaurant businesses • Saves 112 million gallons of water per year

I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Arlene Tamayo
92223
[email protected]

171
Christina Taylor
From:[email protected]
Sent:Saturday, October 15, 2022 2:09 PM
To:Christina Taylor; Carole Kendrick; Nicole Wheelwright; Rey Santos; Lloyd White; David Fenn; Mike Lara; Julio Martinez
Subject:Jason Pritchard Says YES for Beaumont Summit Station Please Vote Yes for the Beaumont Summit Station project!

I am a Beaumont resident who supports Beaumont Summit Station because it provides $78 million in traffic funding that the city needs to fix our roads!

The project includes a commercial center along with three industrial buildings. Summit Station offers more benefits, such as jobs and retail amenities, than the housing plan.

Additionally, I support the project because it:

• Prevents an additional 1,640 daily trips on Brookside Ave • Contributes $10 million to a new 123-acre community park and sports complex • Preserves 30 acres of natural open space buffer between residential neighborhoods • Creates 2,800 new permanent jobs from industrial, retail, and restaurant businesses • Saves 112 million gallons of water per year

I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Jason Pritchard
92223
[email protected]

172
Christina Taylor
From:Julie
Sent:Saturday, October 15, 2022 1:00 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:Re: Beaumont Summit Station - Public Hearing Notice Thank you but shouldn’t the website be updated? No emails go out any longer either so it feels like a secretive deal is being made.

Sent from my iPhone

On Oct 15, 2022, at 9:30 AM, Christina Taylor wrote:

Good morning Julie,

The Summit Station project is schedule for a public hearing at City Council on Tuesday, October 18th at 6pm. The agenda and information can be found using the link below.

https://pub-beaumont.escribemeetings.com/?MeetingviewId=6&Year=2022

CHRISTINA TAYLOR
Deputy City Manager
City of Beaumont
550 E. 6th Street, Beaumont, Ca 92223
Desk (951) 572-3212 | Fax (951) 769-8526
BeaumontCa.gov
Facebook | Twitter | Instagram | YouTube

#ACITYELEVATED

Get Outlook for iOS
From: Julie
Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2022 7:17:32 AM
To: Christina Taylor
Subject: Re: Beaumont Summit Station - Public Hearing Notice

What is the latest on the Summit Station please? The website isn’t updated.

Thank you!
Sent from my iPhone

On Jul 1, 2022, at 2:37 PM, Julie wrote:

173
Thank you for these updates!
Sent from my iPhone

On Jul 1, 2022, at 1:41 PM, Christina Taylor
wrote:

Good afternoon,

You are receiving this email because you have requested project updates for the proposed Summit Station project in the City of Beaumont. Attached is the Public Hearing notice for consideration of this project by the City Council on July 19, 2022. The Planning Commission heard the item on June 28, 2022, and in a 4-1 vote, forwarded a recommendation of denial of the project to City Council.

All project information available to date can be found here https://www.beaumontca.gov/1239/Beaumont-Summit-Station .

CHRISTINA TAYLOR
Deputy City Manager

City of Beaumont
550 E. 6th Street, Beaumont, Ca 92223
Desk (951) 572-3212
BeaumontCa.gov
Facebook | Twitter | Instagram | YouTube

#ACITYELEVATED

174
Christina Taylor
From:[email protected]
Sent:Saturday, October 15, 2022 11:45 AM
To:Christina Taylor; Carole Kendrick; Nicole Wheelwright; Rey Santos; Lloyd White; David Fenn; Mike Lara; Julio Martinez
Subject:Starr Eaton Says YES for Beaumont Summit Station Please Vote Yes for the Beaumont Summit Station project!

I am a Beaumont resident who supports Beaumont Summit Station because it provides $78 million in traffic funding that the city needs to fix our roads!

The project includes a commercial center along with three industrial buildings. Summit Station offers more benefits, such as jobs and retail amenities, than the housing plan.

Additionally, I support the project because it:

• Prevents an additional 1,640 daily trips on Brookside Ave • Contributes $10 million to a new 123-acre community park and sports complex • Preserves 30 acres of natural open space buffer between residential neighborhoods • Creates 2,800 new permanent jobs from industrial, retail, and restaurant businesses • Saves 112 million gallons of water per year

I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Starr Eaton
92223
[email protected]

175
Christina Taylor
From:[email protected]
Sent:Saturday, October 15, 2022 10:28 AM
To:Christina Taylor; Carole Kendrick; Nicole Wheelwright; Rey Santos; Lloyd White; David Fenn; Mike Lara; Julio Martinez
Subject:Matt Kenny Says YES for Beaumont Summit Station Please Vote Yes for the Beaumont Summit Station project!

I am a Beaumont resident who supports Beaumont Summit Station because it provides $78 million in traffic funding that the city needs to fix our roads!

The project includes a commercial center along with three industrial buildings. Summit Station offers more benefits, such as jobs and retail amenities, than the housing plan.

Additionally, I support the project because it:

• Prevents an additional 1,640 daily trips on Brookside Ave • Contributes $10 million to a new 123-acre community park and sports complex • Preserves 30 acres of natural open space buffer between residential neighborhoods • Creates 2,800 new permanent jobs from industrial, retail, and restaurant businesses • Saves 112 million gallons of water per year

I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Matt Kenny
92223
[email protected]

176
Christina Taylor
From:Ron Roy
Sent:Saturday, October 15, 2022 10:24 AM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:Re: Beaumont Summit Station: Oct 18th hearing
Thank you.

On Sat, Oct 15, 2022 at 9:17 AM Christina Taylor wrote:

Hi Ron,

Previously submitted public comments will be included for Council.

CHRISTINA TAYLOR
Deputy City Manager
City of Beaumont
550 E. 6th Street, Beaumont, Ca 92223
Desk (951) 572-3212 | Fax (951) 769-8526
BeaumontCa.gov
Facebook | Twitter | Instagram | YouTube

#ACITYELEVATED

Get Outlook for iOS
From: Ron Roy
Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2022 12:53:05 PM
To: Christina Taylor
Subject: Beaumont Summit Station: Oct 18th hearing

Hello Christina

Are public comments submitted during the October 2021 and June 2022 hearings automatically included for the councils review, or do they have to be resubmitted? I hope its the first instance.

Thank you

Ron Roy

177
Christina Taylor
From:[email protected]
Sent:Friday, October 14, 2022 9:05 PM
To:Christina Taylor; Carole Kendrick; Nicole Wheelwright; Rey Santos; Lloyd White; David Fenn; Mike Lara; Julio Martinez
Subject:Candyce Scott Says YES for Beaumont Summit Station Please Vote Yes for the Beaumont Summit Station project!

I am a Beaumont resident who supports Beaumont Summit Station because it provides $78 million in traffic funding that the city needs to fix our roads!

The project includes a commercial center along with three industrial buildings. Summit Station offers more benefits, such as jobs and retail amenities, than the housing plan.

Additionally, I support the project because it:

• Prevents an additional 1,640 daily trips on Brookside Ave • Contributes $10 million to a new 123-acre community park and sports complex • Preserves 30 acres of natural open space buffer between residential neighborhoods • Creates 2,800 new permanent jobs from industrial, retail, and restaurant businesses • Saves 112 million gallons of water per year

I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Candyce Scott
92223
[email protected]

178
Christina Taylor
From:Nicole Wheelwright
Sent:Friday, October 14, 2022 7:21 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:Fw: Resolution Opposing Beaumont Summit Station Warehouse Attachments:Resolution oppositng Summit Station.docx
To add to the folder. For the next pdf grouping.

From: Marcia
Sent: Friday, October 14, 2022 7:18 PM
To: Nicole Wheelwright
Subject: FW: Resolution Opposing Beaumont Summit Station Warehouse

Attached is a Resolution Opposing the Beaumont Summit Station warehouse Which, was adopted by the Board of Directors for Solera Oak Valley Greens Homeowners Association on May 9, 2022.

We would like to make sure the members of the City Council of Beaumont are aware of our opposition to this project.

Thank you,

Marcia Casem
President

Sent from Mail for Windows

179
Christina Taylor
From:[email protected]
Sent:Friday, October 14, 2022 4:40 PM
To:Christina Taylor; Carole Kendrick; Nicole Wheelwright; Rey Santos; Lloyd White; David Fenn; Mike Lara; Julio Martinez
Subject:Bernard Albanese Says YES for Beaumont Summit Station Please Vote Yes for the Beaumont Summit Station project!

I am a Beaumont resident who supports Beaumont Summit Station because it provides $78 million in traffic funding that the city needs to fix our roads!

The project includes a commercial center along with three industrial buildings. Summit Station offers more benefits, such as jobs and retail amenities, than the housing plan.

Additionally, I support the project because it:

• Prevents an additional 1,640 daily trips on Brookside Ave • Contributes $10 million to a new 123-acre community park and sports complex • Preserves 30 acres of natural open space buffer between residential neighborhoods • Creates 2,800 new permanent jobs from industrial, retail, and restaurant businesses • Saves 112 million gallons of water per year

I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Bernard Albanese
92223
[email protected]

180
Christina Taylor
From:[email protected]
Sent:Friday, October 14, 2022 4:32 PM
To:Christina Taylor; Carole Kendrick; Nicole Wheelwright; Rey Santos; Lloyd White; David Fenn; Mike Lara; Julio Martinez
Subject:Bobbie joe Raymond Says YES for Beaumont Summit Station Please Vote Yes for the Beaumont Summit Station project!

I am a Beaumont resident who supports Beaumont Summit Station because it provides $78 million in traffic funding that the city needs to fix our roads!

The project includes a commercial center along with three industrial buildings. Summit Station offers more benefits, such as jobs and retail amenities, than the housing plan.

Additionally, I support the project because it:

• Prevents an additional 1,640 daily trips on Brookside Ave • Contributes $10 million to a new 123-acre community park and sports complex • Preserves 30 acres of natural open space buffer between residential neighborhoods • Creates 2,800 new permanent jobs from industrial, retail, and restaurant businesses • Saves 112 million gallons of water per year

I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Bobbie joe Raymond
92223
[email protected]

181
Christina Taylor
From:[email protected]
Sent:Friday, October 14, 2022 3:41 PM
To:Christina Taylor; Carole Kendrick; Nicole Wheelwright; Rey Santos; Lloyd White; David Fenn; Mike Lara; Julio Martinez
Subject:Violeta Perez Says YES for Beaumont Summit Station Please Vote Yes for the Beaumont Summit Station project!

I am a Beaumont resident who supports Beaumont Summit Station because it provides $78 million in traffic funding that the city needs to fix our roads!

The project includes a commercial center along with three industrial buildings. Summit Station offers more benefits, such as jobs and retail amenities, than the housing plan.

Additionally, I support the project because it:

• Prevents an additional 1,640 daily trips on Brookside Ave • Contributes $10 million to a new 123-acre community park and sports complex • Preserves 30 acres of natural open space buffer between residential neighborhoods • Creates 2,800 new permanent jobs from industrial, retail, and restaurant businesses • Saves 112 million gallons of water per year

I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Violeta Perez
92223
[email protected]

182
Christina Taylor
From:[email protected]
Sent:Friday, October 14, 2022 2:01 PM
To:Christina Taylor; Carole Kendrick; Nicole Wheelwright; Rey Santos; Lloyd White; David Fenn; Mike Lara; Julio Martinez
Subject:Katie Chamlee Says YES for Beaumont Summit Station Please Vote Yes for the Beaumont Summit Station project!

I am a Beaumont resident who supports Beaumont Summit Station because it provides $78 million in traffic funding that the city needs to fix our roads!

The project includes a commercial center along with three industrial buildings. Summit Station offers more benefits, such as jobs and retail amenities, than the housing plan.

Additionally, I support the project because it:

• Prevents an additional 1,640 daily trips on Brookside Ave • Contributes $10 million to a new 123-acre community park and sports complex • Preserves 30 acres of natural open space buffer between residential neighborhoods • Creates 2,800 new permanent jobs from industrial, retail, and restaurant businesses • Saves 112 million gallons of water per year

I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Katie Chamlee
92223
[email protected]

183
Christina Taylor
From:[email protected]
Sent:Friday, October 14, 2022 11:00 AM
To:Christina Taylor; Carole Kendrick; Nicole Wheelwright; Rey Santos; Lloyd White; David Fenn; Mike Lara; Julio Martinez
Subject:Lisa Grana Says YES for Beaumont Summit Station Please Vote Yes for the Beaumont Summit Station project!

I am a Beaumont resident who supports Beaumont Summit Station because it provides $78 million in traffic funding that the city needs to fix our roads!

The project includes a commercial center along with three industrial buildings. Summit Station offers more benefits, such as jobs and retail amenities, than the housing plan.

Additionally, I support the project because it:

• Prevents an additional 1,640 daily trips on Brookside Ave • Contributes $10 million to a new 123-acre community park and sports complex • Preserves 30 acres of natural open space buffer between residential neighborhoods • Creates 2,800 new permanent jobs from industrial, retail, and restaurant businesses • Saves 112 million gallons of water per year

I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Lisa Grana
92223
[email protected]

184
Christina Taylor
From:[email protected]
Sent:Friday, October 14, 2022 9:20 AM
To:Christina Taylor; Carole Kendrick; Nicole Wheelwright; Rey Santos; Lloyd White; David Fenn; Mike Lara; Julio Martinez
Subject:ALFONSO AVALOS Says YES for Beaumont Summit Station Please Vote Yes for the Beaumont Summit Station project!

I am a Beaumont resident who supports Beaumont Summit Station because it provides $78 million in traffic funding that the city needs to fix our roads!

The project includes a commercial center along with three industrial buildings. Summit Station offers more benefits, such as jobs and retail amenities, than the housing plan.

Additionally, I support the project because it:

• Prevents an additional 1,640 daily trips on Brookside Ave • Contributes $10 million to a new 123-acre community park and sports complex • Preserves 30 acres of natural open space buffer between residential neighborhoods • Creates 2,800 new permanent jobs from industrial, retail, and restaurant businesses • Saves 112 million gallons of water per year

I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

ALFONSO AVALOS
92223
[email protected]

185
Christina Taylor
From:[email protected]
Sent:Friday, October 14, 2022 9:16 AM
To:Christina Taylor; Carole Kendrick; Nicole Wheelwright; Rey Santos; Lloyd White; David Fenn; Mike Lara; Julio Martinez
Subject:Emily Aviles Says YES for Beaumont Summit Station Please Vote Yes for the Beaumont Summit Station project!

I am a Beaumont resident who supports Beaumont Summit Station because it provides $78 million in traffic funding that the city needs to fix our roads!

The project includes a commercial center along with three industrial buildings. Summit Station offers more benefits, such as jobs and retail amenities, than the housing plan.

Additionally, I support the project because it:

• Prevents an additional 1,640 daily trips on Brookside Ave • Contributes $10 million to a new 123-acre community park and sports complex • Preserves 30 acres of natural open space buffer between residential neighborhoods • Creates 2,800 new permanent jobs from industrial, retail, and restaurant businesses • Saves 112 million gallons of water per year

I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Emily Aviles
92223
[email protected]

186
Christina Taylor
From:[email protected]
Sent:Friday, October 14, 2022 7:06 AM
To:Christina Taylor; Carole Kendrick; Nicole Wheelwright; Rey Santos; Lloyd White; David Fenn; Mike Lara; Julio Martinez
Subject:Karen Johnson Says YES for Beaumont Summit Station Please Vote Yes for the Beaumont Summit Station project!

I am a Beaumont resident who supports Beaumont Summit Station because it provides $78 million in traffic funding that the city needs to fix our roads!

The project includes a commercial center along with three industrial buildings. Summit Station offers more benefits, such as jobs and retail amenities, than the housing plan.

Additionally, I support the project because it:

• Prevents an additional 1,640 daily trips on Brookside Ave • Contributes $10 million to a new 123-acre community park and sports complex • Preserves 30 acres of natural open space buffer between residential neighborhoods • Creates 2,800 new permanent jobs from industrial, retail, and restaurant businesses • Saves 112 million gallons of water per year

I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Karen Johnson
92223
[email protected]

187
Christina Taylor
From:[email protected]
Sent:Friday, October 14, 2022 6:10 AM
To:Christina Taylor; Carole Kendrick; Nicole Wheelwright; Rey Santos; Lloyd White; David Fenn; Mike Lara; Julio Martinez
Subject:Heather Cox Says YES for Beaumont Summit Station Please Vote Yes for the Beaumont Summit Station project!

I am a Beaumont resident who supports Beaumont Summit Station because it provides $78 million in traffic funding that the city needs to fix our roads!

The project includes a commercial center along with three industrial buildings. Summit Station offers more benefits, such as jobs and retail amenities, than the housing plan.

Additionally, I support the project because it:

• Prevents an additional 1,640 daily trips on Brookside Ave • Contributes $10 million to a new 123-acre community park and sports complex • Preserves 30 acres of natural open space buffer between residential neighborhoods • Creates 2,800 new permanent jobs from industrial, retail, and restaurant businesses • Saves 112 million gallons of water per year

I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Heather Cox
92223
[email protected]

188
Christina Taylor
From:[email protected]
Sent:Friday, October 14, 2022 3:34 AM
To:Christina Taylor; Carole Kendrick; Nicole Wheelwright; Rey Santos; Lloyd White; David Fenn; Mike Lara; Julio Martinez
Subject:Ron Dunn Says YES for Beaumont Summit Station
Please Vote Yes for the Beaumont Summit Station project!

I am a Beaumont resident who supports Beaumont Summit Station because it provides $78 million in traffic funding that the city needs to fix our roads!

The project includes a commercial center along with three industrial buildings. Summit Station offers more benefits, such as jobs and retail amenities, than the housing plan.

Additionally, I support the project because it:

• Prevents an additional 1,640 daily trips on Brookside Ave • Contributes $10 million to a new 123-acre community park and sports complex • Preserves 30 acres of natural open space buffer between residential neighborhoods • Creates 2,800 new permanent jobs from industrial, retail, and restaurant businesses • Saves 112 million gallons of water per year

I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Ron Dunn
92223
[email protected]

1 Christina Taylor
From:Greybar, Andrew
Sent:Tuesday, October 18, 2022 12:55 PM
To:Christina Taylor; Carole Kendrick
Cc:Cristina Virgilio
Subject:Fwd: FW: Beaumont Summit Station - City of Calimesa Comments on Notice of Availability
Christina and Carole - it was unfortunate to see that Calimesa submitted their response as they explicitly told us they would not do in the email chain below.
 9/9 Participation agreement delivered to City of Calimesa  9/20 Follow up by Exeter after no response from City of Calimesa  10/4 Participation agreement response and request for additional information, calculations and backup by City of Calimesa
 10/18 Responses and data provided to City of Calimesa from Exeter I've provided the information they requested below and ask that they retract their comment or amend it. Just wanted to give you the heads up.

Thanks,

Andrew Greybar
Senior Project Manager
EQT Exeter
M +1 708-341-9821
5060 N 40th St Suite 108
Phoenix, AZ 85018
[email protected]

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Greybar, Andrew
Date: Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 12:48 PM
Subject: Re: FW: Beaumont Summit Station - City of Calimesa Comments on Notice of Availability To: Bonnie Johnson
Cc: Virgilio, Cristina , Tarikere, Pranesh ,
Ostoich, Mark , Kelly Lucia , Cano, Kari
, Perez, Aldo , Mike Thornton
, Justin Schlaefli , Michael Thornton - City Engineer

Bonnie and Team - it looks like Mark and I short circuited who was going to get you these comments on Friday.

See below. If these responses are satisfactory to the City of Calimesa, we'd ask that you retract your comment letter or amend it so it is not so critical of myself and the project due to a minor miscommunication and delay in providing the information. Given approximately 30 days transpired between our draft of the agreement and Calimesa's response, we believe that to be a fair request.

Thank you and please advise. Thank you,

2 Please see draft response below and let me know if you would like to discuss.

 Please explain the scope of Cherry Valley Interchange improvements meant by “Ramps” as the proposed agreement refers to? The Improvements also include ROW acquisition, bridge, realignment of Calimesa Blvd, etc.

We agree that the mention of "ramps" seems overly limited and understand the scope to be all of the items you mentioned above. The reason we referenced ramps is only because that is how trip generation and Traffic Impact Analysis comes up with the percentage shares we've described. We're open to the City's suggestion for proper accounting of all costs to align with the percentages we impact the "ramps" (or routes). We're imagining a spreadsheet of some kind that we can agree on aligning with the interchange budget.

 Please explain how the fair share will be calculated. Our understanding of this will be key to reaching an agreement.

The June 2022 Kimley-Horn traffic study for the Summit Station Project determined that the average contribution (average of the EB and WB ramps) of the Summit Station Project to the new growth in traffic to Horizon Year (2040) at the Ramps is 20.3%. The percentage was calculated based on project contribution for the highest peak hour at the I-10 / Cherry Valley ramp intersections, which is 16.8% for I-10 EB ramps and

23.8% for I-10WB ramps. The average of the two percentages was calculated as 20.3% to determine the fair share percentage towards the overall interchange improvements. If the City wants to get as granular as separating the budget by EB/WB that's fine with us, but we'd suggest agreeing to the 20.3% average to clearly and simply align with the total interchange budget.

 Please see City comments in the recently submitted (and attached) FEIR Comment letter. Several of these comments refer to the fair share calculation (comments 6 through 11).

The comments say fair share calculation may be affected by inclusion of traffic from additional cumulative projects. It should be noted that fair share calculation is based on project traffic contribution to overall growth to Horizon Year traffic, which is based on RivTAM subregional model. As such fair share percentage will not be affected as the project traffic is not understated. Further, adding additional background traffic will reduce the project’s fair share, so the suggested fair share in the traffic study is conservative.

3  Agreement section 2. “Contribution Toward Interchange”: this section, although short, is confusing and vague. How is the “TUMF portion” defined? Who’s “TUMF portion” does that refer to? What is meant by “other programmed funding”? What does “in immediately available funds” mean? How does all this measure up against Exeter’s representation at the PC Hearing that the project would pay a substantial amount toward the Interchange to ensure completion ($40 million?? – I cannot readily recall the exact amount that was represented).

In addition to the the fair contribution from Exeter discussed above, the project will be required to pay TUMF Development Impact Fees, collected by the City of Beaumont on the behalf of WRCOG. Our initial calculation came to $4,631,283 based on published fee info and square footage, which will be calculated by the City before we're issued permits. Immediately available means to us that we will literally pay the fees prior to permits, to be held onto or spent at the City, County and WRCOG's discretion.

Andrew Greybar
Senior Project Manager
EQT Exeter
M +1 708-341-9821
5060 N 40th St Suite 108
Phoenix, AZ 85018
[email protected]

On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 4:10 PM Bonnie Johnson wrote:

Thank you for the update Andrew.

From: Greybar, Andrew
Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2022 3:02 PM
To: Bonnie Johnson
Cc: Virgilio, Cristina ; Tarikere, Pranesh ;
Ostoich, Mark ; Kelly Lucia ; Cano, Kari
; Perez, Aldo ; Mike Thornton
; Justin Schlaefli ; Michael Thornton - City Engineer

Subject: Re: FW: Beaumont Summit Station - City of Calimesa Comments on Notice of Availability

Bonnie - so that I don't let this hang out there too long, I just wanted to give you a heads up that we're working on responding to each point, flushing out some of the finer points of our contribution and hope to have a decent response to each point by the end of the week.

It suggests to me that we still have some work to do to back up the contribution and mechanism for it in the agreement, but our response should give you enough to push to the next step.

4 Please look out for our email by the end of the week. Thanks!

Andrew Greybar
Senior Project Manager
EQT Exeter
M +1 708-341-9821
5060 N 40th St Suite 108
Phoenix, AZ 85018
[email protected]

On Tue, Oct 4, 2022 at 3:09 PM Bonnie Johnson wrote:

Hi Andrew,

My apologies for the delay. We have been reviewing your FEIR response to comments concurrent with this review. The Comment letter was submitted yesterday. In order to finalize our comments on the Participation Agreement, I need clarification/assistance on a few things:
 Please explain the scope of Cherry Valley Interchange improvements meant by “Ramps” as the proposed agreement refers to? The Improvements also include ROW acquisition, bridge, realignment of Calimesa Blvd, etc.
 Please explain how the fair share will be calculated. Our understanding of this will be key to reaching an agreement.
 Please see City comments in the recently submitted (and attached) FEIR Comment letter. Several of these comments refer to the fair share calculation (comments 6 through 11).  Agreement section 2. “Contribution Toward Interchange”: this section, although short, is confusing and vague. How is the “TUMF portion” defined? Who’s “TUMF portion” does that refer to? What is meant by “other programmed funding”? What does “in immediately available funds” mean? How does all this measure up against Exeter’s representation at the PC Hearing that the project would pay a substantial amount toward the Interchange to ensure completion ($40 million?? – I cannot readily recall the exact amount that was represented).

Thanks so much for working with the City toward an amicable agreement for all parties. We will be able to finalize our comments once we have received the requested clarification.

Bonnie

5 Bonnie Johnson
City Manager
City of Calimesa
(909)795-9801

From: Greybar, Andrew
Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2022 2:08 PM
To: Kelly Lucia
Cc: Virgilio, Cristina ; Tarikere, Pranesh ;
Ostoich, Mark ; Cano, Kari ; Perez, Aldo
; Bonnie Johnson ; Mike Thornton
; Justin Schlaefli
Subject: Re: FW: Beaumont Summit Station - City of Calimesa Comments on Notice of Availability

Kelly and Team - following up on this email. Is there anything you need from us to get this review underway and move toward a final agreement?

Thanks,

Andrew Greybar
Senior Project Manager
EQT Exeter
M +1 708-341-9821
5060 N 40th St Suite 108
Phoenix, AZ 85018
[email protected]

6 On Thu, Sep 8, 2022 at 2:28 PM Greybar, Andrew wrote:

Kelly - please see attached draft of our Participation agreement for the interchange.

Below is a link to the Traffic and Transportation section of our EIR https://www.beaumontca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/37644/415-Transportation

Here is a link to the Appendix K TIA and VMT
https://www.beaumontca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/37620/Appendix-K-Traffic

Can you and your team please review and provide a redline or comments to the attached documents? Let me know if you'd like to get on a call to discuss - happy to do that at your earliest convenience.

Thanks,

Andrew Greybar
Senior Project Manager
EQT Exeter
M +1 708-341-9821
5060 N 40th St Suite 108
Phoenix, AZ 85018
[email protected]

On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 3:52 PM Kelly Lucia wrote:

Hi Andrew,

7 Yes, we did hear about the continuation. We don't have a template agreement, so please feel free to take the first crack at drafting one for our review. If there is going to be a TUMF agreement, we assume that will go through the City of Beaumont. However, we would be happy to provide some improvement descriptions if needed. If the project intends to go over and above TUMF (as discussed during the Planning Commission hearing) we would request that Beaumont memorialize the commitment in a project condition of approval, to be followed with a MOU. Please let us know if any clarifications are needed, we would be happy to discuss further.

Thank you,

Kelly Lucia, M. URP
Planning Manager

Cell 909.809.8778 (preferred)
Office 909.795.9801 ext. 229
Email
[email protected]

From: Greybar, Andrew
Sent: Monday, July 18, 2022 9:39 PM
To: Kelly Lucia
Cc: Virgilio, Cristina ; Tarikere, Pranesh ;
Ostoich, Mark ; Cano, Kari ; Perez, Aldo
; Bonnie Johnson ; Mike Thornton
; Justin Schlaefli
Subject: Re: FW: Beaumont Summit Station - City of Calimesa Comments on Notice of Availability

Kelly - sorry for the delay, you may have heard but we are continued to the August Beaumont Council meeting.

In conferring with Mark Ostoich, we're wondering if there is a template agreement you've used with a developer to contribute to the interchange improvements, or any direction you can provide so that we have a framework for drafting it ourselves?

8 Thanks,

Andrew Greybar
Senior Project Manager
EQT Exeter
M +1 708-341-9821
5060 N 40th St Suite 108
Phoenix, AZ 85018
[email protected]

On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 3:13 PM Kelly Lucia wrote:

Hi Andrew,

Here is the information I received back from the City Engineer. Also, do you have any update on the draft agreement(s)?

Question: Information about the improvement and their status and costs

Response: Cherry Valley Interchange shall include ultimate interchange construction that includes a diverging diamond interchange and related work including realignment of Calimesa Boulevard. The City, in collaboration with the County of Riverside, has completed the Project Study Report step with Caltrans and is just about complete with Project Approval and Environmental Document (PA&ED) step – the Environmental Document has been circulated and comments have been received. Plans, Specifications, and Estimates step has commenced. It will be followed by right-of-way acquisition and construction.

Thank you,

Kelly Lucia, M. URP
Planning Manager

Cell 909.809.8778 (preferred)
Office 909.795.9801 ext. 229
Email
[email protected]

9 From: Greybar, Andrew
Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2022 2:34 PM
To: Kelly Lucia
Cc: Virgilio, Cristina ; Tarikere, Pranesh ;
Ostoich, Mark ; Cano, Kari ; Perez, Aldo
; Bonnie Johnson ; Mike Thornton
; Justin Schlaefli
Subject: Re: FW: Beaumont Summit Station - City of Calimesa Comments on Notice of Availability

Really appreciate all the info. We'll take a look at the agreements you linked and look out for the intel you mentioned from Mike Thornton soon.

Thanks again and we'll work internally to get the first steps of agreement going. Please let us know if you need anything in the meantime!

Andrew Greybar
Senior Project Manager
EQT Exeter
M +1 708-341-9821
5060 N 40th St Suite 108
Phoenix, AZ 85018
[email protected]

On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 9:21 AM Kelly Lucia wrote:

Good morning Andrew and team,

Please see the below responses to your questions. We look forward to working together.  Parties to be involved in crafting and negotiating the agreement (feel free to send an intro email)

10  The parties to be involved are Bonnie Johnson (City Manager), myself (Planning Manager), Mike Thornton (City Engineer), Justin Schlaefli (City Traffic Engineer) (all copied here), and the City Attorney's office. Calimesa staff will loop the City Attorney's office as appropriate.
 Information about the improvements and their status and costs  Mike Thornton to provide.
 Agreements with adjacent developers for the same improvements  We are aware that the I-10 logistics (Shopoff) project is conditioned by Riverside County to contribute to interim and ultimate improvements at I- 10/Cherry Valley Blvd. Those conditions can be found here:
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fo/xeu38zztgmggfkd0mwekb/h?dl=0&rlkey= o4pmnowqsuyvgffrjyyv6ncvn. There may be other agreements related to the Shopoff project, which can be obtained from the project representatives.

There is also the CV Communities settlement agreement and TUMF agreement related to the former project. We suspect that new Agreements will replace prior ones, potentially.
 Any guidance or next steps the City of Calimesa would like to take as we move toward an agreement
 When reaching out to our team, please ensure to copy all staff included here (Bonnie, myself, Mike, and Justin) so that we all stay in the loop.

Thank you,

Kelly Lucia, M. URP
Planning Manager

Cell 909.809.8778 (preferred)
Office 909.795.9801 ext. 229
Email
[email protected]

From: Greybar, Andrew
Sent: Wednesday, June 8, 2022 10:02 AM
To: Kelly Lucia
Cc: Virgilio, Cristina ; Tarikere, Pranesh ;

11 Ostoich, Mark ; Cano, Kari ; Perez, Aldo

Subject: Re: FW: Beaumont Summit Station - City of Calimesa Comments on Notice of Availability

Kelly,

We received your letter through the City of Beaumont and wanted to express our interest in entering into an agreement with the City of Calimesa toward the described traffic improvements. Copied is our fantastic team of experts that will help toward that end. We are meeting internally to prepare some questions and comments that will help in drafting the agreement and plan to prepare the first draft for the City of Calimesa's review soon.

Could you please provide us with as much of the information below as possible:
 Parties to be involved in crafting and negotiating the agreement (feel free to send an intro email)  Information about the improvements and their status and costs  Agreements with adjacent developers for the same improvements  Any guidance or next steps the City of Calimesa would like to take as we move toward an agreement
Thanks,

Andrew Greybar
Senior Project Manager
EQT Exeter
M +1 708-341-9821
5060 N 40th St Suite 108
Phoenix, AZ 85018
[email protected]

On Mon, Jun 6, 2022 at 10:32 AM Cano, Kari wrote:

Hello all,

Please review the letter we received from the City of Calimesa.

Thank you,

12 Kari

Kari Cano
Kimley-Horn | 3880 Lemon Street, Suite 420, Riverside, CA 92501 Direct: 951-543-9869 | Mobile Phone: 951-212-3848 |
Connect with us: Twitter | LinkedIn | Facebook | Instagram | Kimley-Horn.com Celebrating 14 years as one of FORTUNE’s 100 Best Companies to Work For

From: Christina Taylor
Sent: Monday, June 6, 2022 9:56 AM
To: Cano, Kari ; Harry, Jennifer
Cc: Carole Kendrick
Subject: FW: Beaumont Summit Station - City of Calimesa Comments on Notice of Availability

FYI from Calimesa

CHRISTINA TAYLOR
Deputy City Manager

City of Beaumont
550 E. 6th Street, Beaumont, Ca 92223
Desk (951) 572-3212
BeaumontCa.gov
Facebook | Twitter | Instagram | YouTube

13 #ACITYELEVATED

From: Kelly Lucia
Sent: Monday, June 06, 2022 9:26 AM
To: Christina Taylor
Subject: Beaumont Summit Station - City of Calimesa Comments on Notice of Availability

Good morning Christina,

Please find attached the City of Calimesa's comments on the Notice of Availability for the Beaumont Summit Station Draft EIR. A hard copy of the letter is also being sent to City Hall to your attention. We look forward to continue working with you on this project.

Thank you,

Kelly Lucia, M. URP
Planning Manager

Cell 909.809.8778 (preferred)
Office 909.795.9801 ext. 229

14 Email
[email protected]

To help protect your priv acy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.

This message and any attachment(s) hereto are confidential and may be privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that you have received this message in error and that you must not - in whole or in part - review, copy, distribute, retain copies or disclose the contents of this message or any attachments hereto. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this message and any attachment from your system.

To help protect your priv acy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.

This message and any attachment(s) hereto are confidential and may be privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that you have received this message in error and that you must not - in whole or in part - review, copy, distribute, retain copies or disclose the contents of this message or any attachments hereto. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this message and any attachment from your system.

To help protect your priv acy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.

This message and any attachment(s) hereto are confidential and may be privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that you have received this message in error and that you must not - in whole or in part - review, copy, distribute, retain copies or disclose the contents of this message or any attachments hereto. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this message and any attachment from your system.

To help protect your priv acy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.

This message and any attachment(s) hereto are confidential and may be privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that you have received this message in error and that you must not - in whole or in part - review, copy, distribute, retain copies or disclose the contents of this

15 message or any attachments hereto. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this message and any attachment from your system.

This message and any attachment(s) hereto are confidential and may be privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that you have received this message in error and that you must not - in whole or in part - review, copy, distribute, retain copies or disclose the contents of this message or any attachments hereto. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this message and any attachment from your system.

This message and any attachment(s) hereto are confidential and may be privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that you have received this message in error and that you must not - in whole or in part - review, copy, distribute, retain copies or disclose the contents of this message or any attachments hereto. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this message and any attachment from your system.

16 Christina Taylor
From:Greybar, Andrew
Sent:Tuesday, October 18, 2022 12:56 PM
To:Kelly Lucia
Cc:Christina Taylor; Carole Kendrick; Bonnie Johnson; Elizabeth Gibbs Subject:Re: Beaumont Summit Station Public Hearing - City of Calimesa Statement for the Public Record
Kelly - Exeter has since provided this information requested to the City of Calimesa and requested that the City of Calimesa amend or retract their comment upon review.

Thank you,

Andrew Greybar
Senior Project Manager
EQT Exeter
M +1 708-341-9821
5060 N 40th St Suite 108
Phoenix, AZ 85018
[email protected]

On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 11:12 AM Kelly Lucia wrote:

Good morning Christina,

Please find attached the City of Calimesa's statement on the Beaumont Summit Station project. We request that this be entered into the record during tonight's public hearing please.

Thank you,

Kelly Lucia, M. URP
Planning Director

Cell 909.809.8778 (preferred)
Office 909.795.9801 ext. 229
Email
[email protected]

This message and any attachment(s) hereto are confidential and may be privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that you have received this message in error and that you must not - in whole or in part - review, copy, distribute, retain copies or disclose the contents of this message or any attachments hereto. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this message and any attachment from your system.

17 Christina Taylor
From:Bonnie Johnson
Sent:Tuesday, October 18, 2022 1:34 PM
To:Greybar, Andrew
Cc:Virgilio, Cristina; Tarikere, Pranesh; Ostoich, Mark; Kelly Lucia; Cano, Kari; Perez, Aldo; Mike Thornton; Justin Schlaefli; Michael Thornton - City Engineer; Christina Taylor; Elizabeth Gibbs
Subject:RE: FW: Beaumont Summit Station - City of Calimesa Comments on Notice of Availability
Hi Andrew,

My apologies as the statement was not meant to be over critical of you/Exeter just a statement about literally where we are so that the City’s interests were on record in the public hearing. I would like nothing better than to come to an amicable agreement. However, entitlements are being acted upon this evening, including the certification of the EIR, and thus time has run short for the parties to get an agreement prior to tonight’s hearing. Mitigation of concerns noted by Calimesa will potentially(and most likely) require amendments to the EIR.

I will amend the statement to remove any mention of the email from you but will not retract the statement and attached letter as it is important to Calimesa to have our mitigation concerns on the record.

I will be sending the revision in a follow up email.

Respectfully,

Bonnie

Bonnie Johnson
City Manager
City of Calimesa
(909)795-9801

From: Greybar, Andrew
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2022 12:49 PM
To: Bonnie Johnson
Cc: Virgilio, Cristina ; Tarikere, Pranesh ;
Ostoich, Mark ; Kelly Lucia ; Cano, Kari
; Perez, Aldo ; Mike Thornton
; Justin Schlaefli ; Michael Thornton - City Engineer

Subject: Re: FW: Beaumont Summit Station - City of Calimesa Comments on Notice of Availability

Bonnie and Team - it looks like Mark and I short circuited who was going to get you these comments on Friday.

See below. If these responses are satisfactory to the City of Calimesa, we'd ask that you retract your comment

18 letter or amend it so it is not so critical of myself and the project due to a minor miscommunication and delay in providing the information. Given approximately 30 days transpired between our draft of the agreement and Calimesa's response, we believe that to be a fair request.

Thank you and please advise. Thank you,

Please see draft response below and let me know if you would like to discuss.

 Please explain the scope of Cherry Valley Interchange improvements meant by “Ramps” as the proposed agreement refers to? The Improvements also include ROW acquisition, bridge, realignment of Calimesa Blvd, etc.

We agree that the mention of "ramps" seems overly limited and understand the scope to be all of the items you mentioned above. The reason we referenced ramps is only because that is how trip generation and Traffic Impact Analysis comes up with the percentage shares we've described. We're open to the City's suggestion for proper accounting of all costs to align with the percentages we impact the "ramps" (or routes). We're imagining a spreadsheet of some kind that we can agree on aligning with the interchange budget.

 Please explain how the fair share will be calculated. Our understanding of this will be key to reaching an agreement.

The June 2022 Kimley-Horn traffic study for the Summit Station Project determined that the average contribution (average of the EB and WB ramps) of the Summit Station Project to the new growth in traffic to Horizon Year (2040) at the Ramps is 20.3%. The percentage was calculated based on project contribution for the highest peak hour at the I-10 / Cherry Valley ramp intersections, which is 16.8% for I-10 EB ramps and

23.8% for I-10WB ramps. The average of the two percentages was calculated as 20.3% to determine the fair share percentage towards the overall interchange improvements. If the City wants to get as granular as separating the budget by EB/WB that's fine with us, but we'd suggest agreeing to the 20.3% average to clearly and simply align with the total interchange budget.

 Please see City comments in the recently submitted (and attached) FEIR Comment letter. Several of these comments refer to the fair share calculation (comments 6 through 11).

19 The comments say fair share calculation may be affected by inclusion of traffic from additional cumulative projects. It should be noted that fair share calculation is based on project traffic contribution to overall growth to Horizon Year traffic, which is based on RivTAM subregional model. As such fair share percentage will not be affected as the project traffic is not understated. Further, adding additional background traffic will reduce the project’s fair share, so the suggested fair share in the traffic study is conservative.

 Agreement section 2. “Contribution Toward Interchange”: this section, although short, is confusing and vague. How is the “TUMF portion” defined? Who’s “TUMF portion” does that refer to? What is meant by “other programmed funding”? What does “in immediately available funds” mean? How does all this measure up against Exeter’s representation at the PC Hearing that the project would pay a substantial amount toward the Interchange to ensure completion ($40 million?? – I cannot readily recall the exact amount that was represented).

In addition to the the fair contribution from Exeter discussed above, the project will be required to pay TUMF Development Impact Fees, collected by the City of Beaumont on the behalf of WRCOG. Our initial calculation came to $4,631,283 based on published fee info and square footage, which will be calculated by the City before we're issued permits. Immediately available means to us that we will literally pay the fees prior to permits, to be held onto or spent at the City, County and WRCOG's discretion.

Andrew Greybar
Senior Project Manager
EQT Exeter
M +1 708-341-9821
5060 N 40th St Suite 108
Phoenix, AZ 85018
[email protected]

On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 4:10 PM Bonnie Johnson wrote:

Thank you for the update Andrew.

From: Greybar, Andrew
Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2022 3:02 PM
To: Bonnie Johnson
Cc: Virgilio, Cristina ; Tarikere, Pranesh ;
Ostoich, Mark ; Kelly Lucia ; Cano, Kari
; Perez, Aldo ; Mike Thornton
; Justin Schlaefli ; Michael Thornton - City Engineer

Subject: Re: FW: Beaumont Summit Station - City of Calimesa Comments on Notice of Availability

Bonnie - so that I don't let this hang out there too long, I just wanted to give you a heads up that we're working on responding to each point, flushing out some of the finer points of our contribution and hope to have a decent response to each point by the end of the week.

20 It suggests to me that we still have some work to do to back up the contribution and mechanism for it in the agreement, but our response should give you enough to push to the next step.

Please look out for our email by the end of the week. Thanks!

Andrew Greybar
Senior Project Manager
EQT Exeter
M +1 708-341-9821
5060 N 40th St Suite 108
Phoenix, AZ 85018
[email protected]

On Tue, Oct 4, 2022 at 3:09 PM Bonnie Johnson wrote:

Hi Andrew,

My apologies for the delay. We have been reviewing your FEIR response to comments concurrent with this review. The Comment letter was submitted yesterday. In order to finalize our comments on the Participation Agreement, I need clarification/assistance on a few things:
 Please explain the scope of Cherry Valley Interchange improvements meant by “Ramps” as the proposed agreement refers to? The Improvements also include ROW acquisition, bridge, realignment of Calimesa Blvd, etc.
 Please explain how the fair share will be calculated. Our understanding of this will be key to reaching an agreement.
 Please see City comments in the recently submitted (and attached) FEIR Comment letter. Several of these comments refer to the fair share calculation (comments 6 through 11).  Agreement section 2. “Contribution Toward Interchange”: this section, although short, is confusing and vague. How is the “TUMF portion” defined? Who’s “TUMF portion” does that refer to? What is meant by “other programmed funding”? What does “in immediately available funds” mean? How does all this measure up against Exeter’s representation at the PC Hearing that the project would pay a substantial amount toward the Interchange to ensure completion ($40 million?? – I cannot readily recall the exact amount that was represented).

21 Thanks so much for working with the City toward an amicable agreement for all parties. We will be able to finalize our comments once we have received the requested clarification.

Bonnie

Bonnie Johnson
City Manager
City of Calimesa
(909)795-9801

From: Greybar, Andrew
Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2022 2:08 PM
To: Kelly Lucia
Cc: Virgilio, Cristina ; Tarikere, Pranesh ;
Ostoich, Mark ; Cano, Kari ; Perez, Aldo
; Bonnie Johnson ; Mike Thornton
; Justin Schlaefli
Subject: Re: FW: Beaumont Summit Station - City of Calimesa Comments on Notice of Availability

Kelly and Team - following up on this email. Is there anything you need from us to get this review underway and move toward a final agreement?

Thanks,

Andrew Greybar
Senior Project Manager
EQT Exeter
M +1 708-341-9821
5060 N 40th St Suite 108

22 Phoenix, AZ 85018
[email protected]

On Thu, Sep 8, 2022 at 2:28 PM Greybar, Andrew wrote:

Kelly - please see attached draft of our Participation agreement for the interchange.

Below is a link to the Traffic and Transportation section of our EIR https://www.beaumontca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/37644/415-Transportation

Here is a link to the Appendix K TIA and VMT
https://www.beaumontca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/37620/Appendix-K-Traffic

Can you and your team please review and provide a redline or comments to the attached documents? Let me know if you'd like to get on a call to discuss - happy to do that at your earliest convenience.

Thanks,

Andrew Greybar
Senior Project Manager
EQT Exeter
M +1 708-341-9821
5060 N 40th St Suite 108
Phoenix, AZ 85018
[email protected]

23 On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 3:52 PM Kelly Lucia wrote:

Hi Andrew,

Yes, we did hear about the continuation. We don't have a template agreement, so please feel free to take the first crack at drafting one for our review. If there is going to be a TUMF agreement, we assume that will go through the City of Beaumont. However, we would be happy to provide some improvement descriptions if needed. If the project intends to go over and above TUMF (as discussed during the Planning Commission hearing) we would request that Beaumont memorialize the commitment in a project condition of approval, to be followed with a MOU. Please let us know if any clarifications are needed, we would be happy to discuss further.

Thank you,

Kelly Lucia, M. URP
Planning Manager

Cell 909.809.8778 (preferred)
Office 909.795.9801 ext. 229
Email
[email protected]

From: Greybar, Andrew
Sent: Monday, July 18, 2022 9:39 PM
To: Kelly Lucia
Cc: Virgilio, Cristina ; Tarikere, Pranesh ;
Ostoich, Mark ; Cano, Kari ; Perez, Aldo
; Bonnie Johnson ; Mike Thornton
; Justin Schlaefli
Subject: Re: FW: Beaumont Summit Station - City of Calimesa Comments on Notice of Availability

Kelly - sorry for the delay, you may have heard but we are continued to the August Beaumont Council meeting.

24 In conferring with Mark Ostoich, we're wondering if there is a template agreement you've used with a developer to contribute to the interchange improvements, or any direction you can provide so that we have a framework for drafting it ourselves?

Thanks,

Andrew Greybar
Senior Project Manager
EQT Exeter
M +1 708-341-9821
5060 N 40th St Suite 108
Phoenix, AZ 85018
[email protected]

On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 3:13 PM Kelly Lucia wrote:

Hi Andrew,

Here is the information I received back from the City Engineer. Also, do you have any update on the draft agreement(s)?

Question: Information about the improvement and their status and costs

Response: Cherry Valley Interchange shall include ultimate interchange construction that includes a diverging diamond interchange and related work including realignment of Calimesa Boulevard. The City, in collaboration with the County of Riverside, has completed the Project Study Report step with Caltrans and is just about complete with Project Approval and Environmental Document (PA&ED) step – the Environmental Document has been circulated and comments have been received. Plans, Specifications, and Estimates step has commenced. It will be followed by right-of-way acquisition and construction.

Thank you,

25 Kelly Lucia, M. URP
Planning Manager

Cell 909.809.8778 (preferred)
Office 909.795.9801 ext. 229
Email
[email protected]

From: Greybar, Andrew
Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2022 2:34 PM
To: Kelly Lucia
Cc: Virgilio, Cristina ; Tarikere, Pranesh ;
Ostoich, Mark ; Cano, Kari ; Perez, Aldo
; Bonnie Johnson ; Mike Thornton
; Justin Schlaefli
Subject: Re: FW: Beaumont Summit Station - City of Calimesa Comments on Notice of Availability

Really appreciate all the info. We'll take a look at the agreements you linked and look out for the intel you mentioned from Mike Thornton soon.

Thanks again and we'll work internally to get the first steps of agreement going. Please let us know if you need anything in the meantime!

Andrew Greybar
Senior Project Manager
EQT Exeter
M +1 708-341-9821
5060 N 40th St Suite 108
Phoenix, AZ 85018
[email protected]

On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 9:21 AM Kelly Lucia wrote:

Good morning Andrew and team,

Please see the below responses to your questions. We look forward to working together.

26  Parties to be involved in crafting and negotiating the agreement (feel free to send an intro email)
 The parties to be involved are Bonnie Johnson (City Manager), myself (Planning Manager), Mike Thornton (City Engineer), Justin Schlaefli (City Traffic Engineer) (all copied here), and the City Attorney's office. Calimesa staff will loop the City Attorney's office as appropriate.
 Information about the improvements and their status and costs  Mike Thornton to provide.
 Agreements with adjacent developers for the same improvements  We are aware that the I-10 logistics (Shopoff) project is conditioned by Riverside County to contribute to interim and ultimate improvements at I- 10/Cherry Valley Blvd. Those conditions can be found here:
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fo/xeu38zztgmggfkd0mwekb/h?dl=0&rlkey= o4pmnowqsuyvgffrjyyv6ncvn. There may be other agreements related to the Shopoff project, which can be obtained from the project representatives.

There is also the CV Communities settlement agreement and TUMF agreement related to the former project. We suspect that new Agreements will replace prior ones, potentially.
 Any guidance or next steps the City of Calimesa would like to take as we move toward an agreement
 When reaching out to our team, please ensure to copy all staff included here (Bonnie, myself, Mike, and Justin) so that we all stay in the loop.

Thank you,

Kelly Lucia, M. URP
Planning Manager

Cell 909.809.8778 (preferred)
Office 909.795.9801 ext. 229
Email
[email protected]

27 From: Greybar, Andrew
Sent: Wednesday, June 8, 2022 10:02 AM
To: Kelly Lucia
Cc: Virgilio, Cristina ; Tarikere, Pranesh ;
Ostoich, Mark ; Cano, Kari ; Perez, Aldo

Subject: Re: FW: Beaumont Summit Station - City of Calimesa Comments on Notice of Availability

Kelly,

We received your letter through the City of Beaumont and wanted to express our interest in entering into an agreement with the City of Calimesa toward the described traffic improvements. Copied is our fantastic team of experts that will help toward that end. We are meeting internally to prepare some questions and comments that will help in drafting the agreement and plan to prepare the first draft for the City of Calimesa's review soon.

Could you please provide us with as much of the information below as possible:
 Parties to be involved in crafting and negotiating the agreement (feel free to send an intro email)  Information about the improvements and their status and costs  Agreements with adjacent developers for the same improvements  Any guidance or next steps the City of Calimesa would like to take as we move toward an agreement
Thanks,

Andrew Greybar
Senior Project Manager
EQT Exeter
M +1 708-341-9821
5060 N 40th St Suite 108
Phoenix, AZ 85018
[email protected]

On Mon, Jun 6, 2022 at 10:32 AM Cano, Kari wrote:

Hello all,

Please review the letter we received from the City of Calimesa.

28 Thank you,
Kari

Kari Cano
Kimley-Horn | 3880 Lemon Street, Suite 420, Riverside, CA 92501 Direct: 951-543-9869 | Mobile Phone: 951-212-3848 |
Connect with us: Twitter | LinkedIn | Facebook | Instagram | Kimley-Horn.com Celebrating 14 years as one of FORTUNE’s 100 Best Companies to Work For

From: Christina Taylor
Sent: Monday, June 6, 2022 9:56 AM
To: Cano, Kari ; Harry, Jennifer
Cc: Carole Kendrick
Subject: FW: Beaumont Summit Station - City of Calimesa Comments on Notice of Availability

FYI from Calimesa

CHRISTINA TAYLOR
Deputy City Manager

City of Beaumont
550 E. 6th Street, Beaumont, Ca 92223
Desk (951) 572-3212
BeaumontCa.gov
Facebook | Twitter | Instagram | YouTube

29 #ACITYELEVATED

From: Kelly Lucia
Sent: Monday, June 06, 2022 9:26 AM
To: Christina Taylor
Subject: Beaumont Summit Station - City of Calimesa Comments on Notice of Availability

Good morning Christina,

Please find attached the City of Calimesa's comments on the Notice of Availability for the Beaumont Summit Station Draft EIR. A hard copy of the letter is also being sent to City Hall to your attention. We look forward to continue working with you on this project.

Thank you,

Kelly Lucia, M. URP
Planning Manager

Cell 909.809.8778 (preferred)
Office 909.795.9801 ext. 229

30 Email
[email protected]

To help protect your priv acy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.

This message and any attachment(s) hereto are confidential and may be privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that you have received this message in error and that you must not - in whole or in part - review, copy, distribute, retain copies or disclose the contents of this message or any attachments hereto. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this message and any attachment from your system.

To help protect your priv acy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.

This message and any attachment(s) hereto are confidential and may be privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that you have received this message in error and that you must not - in whole or in part - review, copy, distribute, retain copies or disclose the contents of this message or any attachments hereto. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this message and any attachment from your system.

To help protect your priv acy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.

This message and any attachment(s) hereto are confidential and may be privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that you have received this message in error and that you must not - in whole or in part - review, copy, distribute, retain copies or disclose the contents of this message or any attachments hereto. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this message and any attachment from your system.

To help protect your priv acy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.

This message and any attachment(s) hereto are confidential and may be privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that you have received this message in error and that you must not - in whole or in part - review, copy, distribute, retain copies or disclose the contents of this

31 message or any attachments hereto. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this message and any attachment from your system.

This message and any attachment(s) hereto are confidential and may be privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that you have received this message in error and that you must not - in whole or in part - review, copy, distribute, retain copies or disclose the contents of this message or any attachments hereto. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this message and any attachment from your system.

This message and any attachment(s) hereto are confidential and may be privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that you have received this message in error and that you must not - in whole or in part - review, copy, distribute, retain copies or disclose the contents of this message or any attachments hereto. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this message and any attachment from your system.

32 Christina Taylor
From:Greybar, Andrew
Sent:Tuesday, October 18, 2022 1:43 PM
To:Bonnie Johnson
Cc:Virgilio, Cristina; Tarikere, Pranesh; Ostoich, Mark; Kelly Lucia; Cano, Kari; Perez, Aldo; Mike Thornton; Justin Schlaefli; Michael Thornton - City Engineer; Christina Taylor; Elizabeth Gibbs
Subject:Re: FW: Beaumont Summit Station - City of Calimesa Comments on Notice of Availability
No problem Bonnie, I am completely comfortable with Calimesa protecting their (and the surrounding communities') interests towards reaching an agreement on the interchange. Given the dire need by residents and our project's tenants, and Exeter's $12MM contribution, I'm confident we'll get there, albeit after this meeting.

The intent was to try and keep the tone cooperative, which it sounds like your amended statement should do.

If you're willing to state that both parties have been working diligently toward an agreement I think that captures the spirit we'd like to hear read into the record.

Thanks,

Andrew Greybar
Senior Project Manager
EQT Exeter
M +1 708-341-9821
5060 N 40th St Suite 108
Phoenix, AZ 85018
[email protected]

On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 1:33 PM Bonnie Johnson wrote:

Hi Andrew,

My apologies as the statement was not meant to be over critical of you/Exeter just a statement about literally where we are so that the City’s interests were on record in the public hearing. I would like nothing better than to come to an amicable agreement. However, entitlements are being acted upon this evening, including the certification of the EIR, and thus time has run short for the parties to get an agreement prior to tonight’s hearing. Mitigation of concerns noted by Calimesa will potentially(and most likely) require amendments to the EIR.

I will amend the statement to remove any mention of the email from you but will not retract the statement and attached letter as it is important to Calimesa to have our mitigation concerns on the record.

I will be sending the revision in a follow up email.

33 Respectfully,

Bonnie

Bonnie Johnson
City Manager
City of Calimesa
(909)795-9801

From: Greybar, Andrew
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2022 12:49 PM
To: Bonnie Johnson
Cc: Virgilio, Cristina ; Tarikere, Pranesh ;
Ostoich, Mark ; Kelly Lucia ; Cano, Kari
; Perez, Aldo ; Mike Thornton
; Justin Schlaefli ; Michael Thornton - City Engineer

Subject: Re: FW: Beaumont Summit Station - City of Calimesa Comments on Notice of Availability

Bonnie and Team - it looks like Mark and I short circuited who was going to get you these comments on Friday. See below. If these responses are satisfactory to the City of Calimesa, we'd ask that you retract your comment letter or amend it so it is not so critical of myself and the project due to a minor miscommunication and delay in providing the information. Given approximately 30 days transpired between our draft of the agreement and Calimesa's response, we believe that to be a fair request.

Thank you and please advise. Thank you,

34 Please see draft response below and let me know if you would like to discuss.

 Please explain the scope of Cherry Valley Interchange improvements meant by “Ramps” as the proposed agreement refers to? The Improvements also include ROW acquisition, bridge, realignment of Calimesa Blvd, etc.

We agree that the mention of "ramps" seems overly limited and understand the scope to be all of the items you mentioned above. The reason we referenced ramps is only because that is how trip generation and Traffic Impact Analysis comes up with the percentage shares we've described. We're open to the City's suggestion for proper accounting of all costs to align with the percentages we impact the "ramps" (or routes). We're imagining a spreadsheet of some kind that we can agree on aligning with the interchange budget.

 Please explain how the fair share will be calculated. Our understanding of this will be key to reaching an agreement.

The June 2022 Kimley-Horn traffic study for the Summit Station Project determined that the average contribution (average of the EB and WB ramps) of the Summit Station Project to the new growth in traffic to Horizon Year (2040) at the Ramps is 20.3%. The percentage was calculated based on project contribution for the highest peak hour at the I-10 / Cherry Valley ramp intersections, which is 16.8% for I-10 EB ramps and

23.8% for I-10WB ramps. The average of the two percentages was calculated as 20.3% to determine the fair share percentage towards the overall interchange improvements. If the City wants to get as granular as separating the budget by EB/WB that's fine with us, but we'd suggest agreeing to the 20.3% average to clearly and simply align with the total interchange budget.

 Please see City comments in the recently submitted (and attached) FEIR Comment letter. Several of these comments refer to the fair share calculation (comments 6 through 11).

The comments say fair share calculation may be affected by inclusion of traffic from additional cumulative projects. It should be noted that fair share calculation is based on project traffic contribution to overall growth to Horizon Year traffic, which is based on RivTAM subregional model. As such fair share percentage will not be affected as the project traffic is not understated. Further, adding additional background traffic will reduce the project’s fair share, so the suggested fair share in the traffic study is conservative.

35  Agreement section 2. “Contribution Toward Interchange”: this section, although short, is confusing and vague. How is the “TUMF portion” defined? Who’s “TUMF portion” does that refer to? What is meant by “other programmed funding”? What does “in immediately available funds” mean? How does all this measure up against Exeter’s representation at the PC Hearing that the project would pay a substantial amount toward the Interchange to ensure completion ($40 million?? – I cannot readily recall the exact amount that was represented).

In addition to the the fair contribution from Exeter discussed above, the project will be required to pay TUMF Development Impact Fees, collected by the City of Beaumont on the behalf of WRCOG. Our initial calculation came to $4,631,283 based on published fee info and square footage, which will be calculated by the City before we're issued permits. Immediately available means to us that we will literally pay the fees prior to permits, to be held onto or spent at the City, County and WRCOG's discretion.

Andrew Greybar
Senior Project Manager
EQT Exeter
M +1 708-341-9821
5060 N 40th St Suite 108
Phoenix, AZ 85018
[email protected]

On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 4:10 PM Bonnie Johnson wrote:

Thank you for the update Andrew.

From: Greybar, Andrew
Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2022 3:02 PM
To: Bonnie Johnson
Cc: Virgilio, Cristina ; Tarikere, Pranesh ;
Ostoich, Mark ; Kelly Lucia ; Cano, Kari
; Perez, Aldo ; Mike Thornton
; Justin Schlaefli ; Michael Thornton - City
Engineer
Subject: Re: FW: Beaumont Summit Station - City of Calimesa Comments on Notice of Availability

36 Bonnie - so that I don't let this hang out there too long, I just wanted to give you a heads up that we're working on responding to each point, flushing out some of the finer points of our contribution and hope to have a decent response to each point by the end of the week.

It suggests to me that we still have some work to do to back up the contribution and mechanism for it in the agreement, but our response should give you enough to push to the next step.

Please look out for our email by the end of the week. Thanks!

Andrew Greybar
Senior Project Manager
EQT Exeter
M +1 708-341-9821
5060 N 40th St Suite 108
Phoenix, AZ 85018
[email protected]

On Tue, Oct 4, 2022 at 3:09 PM Bonnie Johnson wrote:

Hi Andrew,

My apologies for the delay. We have been reviewing your FEIR response to comments concurrent with this review. The Comment letter was submitted yesterday. In order to finalize our comments on the Participation Agreement, I need clarification/assistance on a few things:
 Please explain the scope of Cherry Valley Interchange improvements meant by “Ramps” as the proposed agreement refers to? The Improvements also include ROW acquisition, bridge, realignment of Calimesa Blvd, etc.
 Please explain how the fair share will be calculated. Our understanding of this will be key to reaching an agreement.
 Please see City comments in the recently submitted (and attached) FEIR Comment letter. Several of these comments refer to the fair share calculation (comments 6 through 11).  Agreement section 2. “Contribution Toward Interchange”: this section, although short, is confusing and vague. How is the “TUMF portion” defined? Who’s “TUMF portion” does that refer to? What is meant by “other programmed funding”? What does “in immediately available funds” mean? How does all this

37 measure up against Exeter’s representation at the PC Hearing that the project would pay a substantial amount toward the Interchange to ensure completion ($40 million?? – I cannot readily recall the exact amount that was represented).

Thanks so much for working with the City toward an amicable agreement for all parties. We will be able to finalize our comments once we have received the requested clarification.

Bonnie

Bonnie Johnson
City Manager
City of Calimesa
(909)795-9801

From: Greybar, Andrew
Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2022 2:08 PM
To: Kelly Lucia
Cc: Virgilio, Cristina ; Tarikere, Pranesh ;
Ostoich, Mark ; Cano, Kari ; Perez, Aldo
; Bonnie Johnson ; Mike Thornton
; Justin Schlaefli
Subject: Re: FW: Beaumont Summit Station - City of Calimesa Comments on Notice of Availability

Kelly and Team - following up on this email. Is there anything you need from us to get this review underway and move toward a final agreement?

Thanks,

Andrew Greybar

38 Senior Project Manager
EQT Exeter
M +1 708-341-9821
5060 N 40th St Suite 108
Phoenix, AZ 85018
[email protected]

On Thu, Sep 8, 2022 at 2:28 PM Greybar, Andrew wrote:

Kelly - please see attached draft of our Participation agreement for the interchange.

Below is a link to the Traffic and Transportation section of our EIR https://www.beaumontca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/37644/415-Transportation

Here is a link to the Appendix K TIA and VMT
https://www.beaumontca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/37620/Appendix-K-Traffic

Can you and your team please review and provide a redline or comments to the attached documents? Let me know if you'd like to get on a call to discuss - happy to do that at your earliest convenience.

Thanks,

Andrew Greybar
Senior Project Manager
EQT Exeter
M +1 708-341-9821
5060 N 40th St Suite 108
Phoenix, AZ 85018

39 [email protected]

On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 3:52 PM Kelly Lucia wrote:

Hi Andrew,

Yes, we did hear about the continuation. We don't have a template agreement, so please feel free to take the first crack at drafting one for our review. If there is going to be a TUMF agreement, we assume that will go through the City of Beaumont. However, we would be happy to provide some improvement descriptions if needed. If the project intends to go over and above TUMF (as discussed during the Planning Commission hearing) we would request that Beaumont memorialize the commitment in a project condition of approval, to be followed with a MOU. Please let us know if any clarifications are needed, we would be happy to discuss further.

Thank you,

Kelly Lucia, M. URP
Planning Manager

Cell 909.809.8778 (preferred)
Office 909.795.9801 ext. 229
Email
[email protected]

From: Greybar, Andrew
Sent: Monday, July 18, 2022 9:39 PM
To: Kelly Lucia
Cc: Virgilio, Cristina ; Tarikere, Pranesh ;
Ostoich, Mark ; Cano, Kari ; Perez, Aldo
; Bonnie Johnson ; Mike Thornton
; Justin Schlaefli
Subject: Re: FW: Beaumont Summit Station - City of Calimesa Comments on Notice of Availability

40 Kelly - sorry for the delay, you may have heard but we are continued to the August Beaumont Council meeting.

In conferring with Mark Ostoich, we're wondering if there is a template agreement you've used with a developer to contribute to the interchange improvements, or any direction you can provide so that we have a framework for drafting it ourselves?

Thanks,

Andrew Greybar
Senior Project Manager
EQT Exeter
M +1 708-341-9821
5060 N 40th St Suite 108
Phoenix, AZ 85018
[email protected]

On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 3:13 PM Kelly Lucia wrote:

Hi Andrew,

Here is the information I received back from the City Engineer. Also, do you have any update on the draft agreement(s)?

Question: Information about the improvement and their status and costs

Response: Cherry Valley Interchange shall include ultimate interchange construction that includes a diverging diamond interchange and related work including realignment of Calimesa Boulevard. The City, in collaboration with the County of Riverside, has completed the Project Study Report step with Caltrans and is just about complete with Project Approval and Environmental Document (PA&ED) step – the Environmental Document has been circulated and comments have been received. Plans, Specifications, and Estimates step has commenced. It will be followed by right-of-way acquisition and construction.

Thank you,

41 Kelly Lucia, M. URP
Planning Manager

Cell 909.809.8778 (preferred)
Office 909.795.9801 ext. 229
Email
[email protected]

From: Greybar, Andrew
Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2022 2:34 PM
To: Kelly Lucia
Cc: Virgilio, Cristina ; Tarikere, Pranesh ;
Ostoich, Mark ; Cano, Kari ; Perez, Aldo
; Bonnie Johnson ; Mike Thornton
; Justin Schlaefli
Subject: Re: FW: Beaumont Summit Station - City of Calimesa Comments on Notice of Availability

Really appreciate all the info. We'll take a look at the agreements you linked and look out for the intel you mentioned from Mike Thornton soon.

Thanks again and we'll work internally to get the first steps of agreement going. Please let us know if y ou need anything in the meantime!

Andrew Greybar
Senior Project Manager
EQT Exeter
M +1 708-341-9821
5060 N 40th St Suite 108
Phoenix, AZ 85018
[email protected]

On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 9:21 AM Kelly Lucia wrote:

Good morning Andrew and team,

42 Please see the below responses to your questions. We look forward to working together.  Parties to be involved in crafting and negotiating the agreement (feel free to send an intro email)
 The parties to be involved are Bonnie Johnson (City Manager), myself (Planning Manager), Mike Thornton (City Engineer), Justin Schlaefli (City Traffic Engineer) (all copied here), and the City Attorney's office. Calimesa staff will loop the City Attorney's office as appropriate.
 Information about the improvements and their status and costs  Mike Thornton to provide.
 Agreements with adjacent developers for the same improvements  We are aware that the I-10 logistics (Shopoff) project is conditioned by Riverside County to contribute to interim and ultimate improvements at I- 10/Cherry Valley Blvd. Those conditions can be found here:
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fo/xeu38zztgmggfkd0mwekb/h?dl=0&rlkey= o4pmnowqsuyvgffrjyyv6ncvn. There may be other agreements related to the Shopoff project, which can be obtained from the project representatives.

There is also the CV Communities settlement agreement and TUMF agreement related to the former project. We suspect that new Agreements will replace prior ones, potentially.
 Any guidance or next steps the City of Calimesa would like to take as we move toward an agreement
 When reaching out to our team, please ensure to copy all staff included here (Bonnie, myself, Mike, and Justin) so that we all stay in the loop.

Thank you,

Kelly Lucia, M. URP
Planning Manager

Cell 909.809.8778 (preferred)
Office 909.795.9801 ext. 229
Email
[email protected]

43 From: Greybar, Andrew
Sent: Wednesday, June 8, 2022 10:02 AM
To: Kelly Lucia
Cc: Virgilio, Cristina ; Tarikere, Pranesh ;
Ostoich, Mark ; Cano, Kari ; Perez, Aldo

Subject: Re: FW: Beaumont Summit Station - City of Calimesa Comments on Notice of Availability

Kelly,

We received your letter through the City of Beaumont and wanted to express our interest in entering into an agreement with the City of Calimesa toward the described traffic improvements. Copied is our fantastic team of experts that will help toward that end. We are meeting internally to prepare some questions and comments that will help in drafting the agreement and plan to prepare the first draft for the City of Calimesa's review soon.

Could you please provide us with as much of the information below as possible:
 Parties to be involved in crafting and negotiating the agreement (feel free to send an intro email)
 Information about the improvements and their status and costs  Agreements with adjacent developers for the same improvements  Any guidance or next steps the City of Calimesa would like to take as we move toward an agreement
Thanks,

Andrew Greybar
Senior Project Manager
EQT Exeter
M +1 708-341-9821
5060 N 40th St Suite 108
Phoenix, AZ 85018
[email protected]

On Mon, Jun 6, 2022 at 10:32 AM Cano, Kari wrote:

Hello all,

44 Please review the letter we received from the City of Calimesa.

Thank you,
Kari

Kari Cano
Kimley-Horn | 3880 Lemon Street, Suite 420, Riverside, CA 92501 Direct: 951-543-9869 | Mobile Phone: 951-212-3848 |
Connect with us: Twitter | LinkedIn | Facebook | Instagram | Kimley-Horn.com Celebrating 14 years as one of FORTUNE’s 100 Best Companies to Work For

From: Christina Taylor
Sent: Monday, June 6, 2022 9:56 AM
To: Cano, Kari ; Harry, Jennifer
Cc: Carole Kendrick
Subject: FW: Beaumont Summit Station - City of Calimesa Comments on Notice of Availability

FYI from Calimesa

CHRISTINA TAYLOR
Deputy City Manager

City of Beaumont
550 E. 6th Street, Beaumont, Ca 92223
Desk (951) 572-3212
BeaumontCa.gov
Facebook | Twitter | Instagram | YouTube

45 #ACITYELEVATED

From: Kelly Lucia
Sent: Monday, June 06, 2022 9:26 AM
To: Christina Taylor
Subject: Beaumont Summit Station - City of Calimesa Comments on Notice of Availability

Good morning Christina,

Please find attached the City of Calimesa's comments on the Notice of Availability for the Beaumont Summit Station Draft EIR. A hard copy of the letter is also being sent to City Hall to your attention. We look forward to continue working with you on this project.

Thank you,

Kelly Lucia, M. URP
Planning Manager

Cell 909.809.8778 (preferred)
Office 909.795.9801 ext. 229

46 Email
[email protected]

To help protect your priv acy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.

This message and any attachment(s) hereto are confidential and may be privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that you have received this message in error and that you must not - in whole or in part - review, copy, distribute, retain copies or disclose the contents of this message or any attachments hereto. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this message and any attachment from your system.

To help protect your priv acy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.

This message and any attachment(s) hereto are confidential and may be privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that you have received this message in error and that you must not - in whole or in part - review, copy, distribute, retain copies or disclose the contents of this message or any attachments hereto. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this message and any attachment from your system.

To help protect your priv acy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.

This message and any attachment(s) hereto are confidential and may be privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that you have received this message in error and that you must not - in whole or in part - review, copy, distribute, retain copies or disclose the contents of this message or any attachments hereto. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this message and any attachment from your system.

To help protect your priv acy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.

This message and any attachment(s) hereto are confidential and may be privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that you have received this message in error and that you must not - in whole or in part - review, copy, distribute, retain copies or disclose the contents of this

47 message or any attachments hereto. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this message and any attachment from your system.

This message and any attachment(s) hereto are confidential and may be privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that you have received this message in error and that you must not - in whole or in part - review, copy, distribute, retain copies or disclose the contents of this message or any attachments hereto. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this message and any attachment from your system.

This message and any attachment(s) hereto are confidential and may be privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that you have received this message in error and that you must not - in whole or in part - review, copy, distribute, retain copies or disclose the contents of this message or any attachments hereto. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this message and any attachment from your system.

This message and any attachment(s) hereto are confidential and may be privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that you have received this message in error and that you must not - in whole or in part - review, copy, distribute, retain copies or disclose the contents of this message or any attachments hereto. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this message and any attachment from your system.

48 Christina Taylor
From:Nicole Wheelwright
Sent:Tuesday, October 18, 2022 1:56 PM
To:Jaime Salas
Cc:Christina Taylor
Subject:RE: Round 2 of PC Summit Station
Got it, thank you!

- Nicole

From: Jaime Salas
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2022 1:04 PM
To: Nicole Wheelwright
Cc: Christina Taylor
Subject: Round 2 of PC Summit Station

Sent from Mail for Windows

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

49 Christina Taylor
From:Nicole Wheelwright
Sent:Tuesday, October 18, 2022 1:56 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:FW: Opposition To Summit Station

- Nicole

From: jorge vawter
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2022 1:11 PM
To: Nicole Wheelwright
Subject: Opposition To Summit Station

Dear Beaumont City Council Members:

Please vote "NO" to building the Summit Station. Beaumont does not need another warehouse which will bring more trucks, traffic and pollution. Beaumont needs some nice restaurants (not fast food) and more shopping choices.

Thank you!

Sincerely,
Ronnie Zacker
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

50 Christina Taylor
From:Nicole Wheelwright
Sent:Tuesday, October 18, 2022 1:57 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:FW: No to summit station

- Nicole

From: Janet Carpenter
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2022 1:21 PM
To: Nicole Wheelwright
Subject: No to summit station

i live at solara and do want #trucks that this amount of warehousing will bring. I moved here to get away from this volumn of traffic.this amount of ware housing have hundreds of truck bays.the new building here is not open yet and you want to double traffic NO THANK YOU Richard Carpenter Solara resident CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

51 Christina Taylor
From:Nicole Wheelwright
Sent:Tuesday, October 18, 2022 1:57 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:FW: Beaumont the 'elevated city' ???

- Nicole

From: Kurt Galvao On Behalf Of [email protected] Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2022 1:34 PM
To: Nicole Wheelwright
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Beaumont the 'elevated city' ???

Really??? Putting a warehouse in a beautiful rural setting…in the middle of our town? Stupid

The reason we live here is the peace and quiet and rural landscape. Big rig trucks, noise, exhaust, busy roads I’m sorry but if that warehouse goes in we are out, we will move. This will literally be in our back yard, how mean and cruel can you be to propose this???

Just breaks my heart.

So much for the ‘elevated city’ more like the city planners lining their pockets and the board is too weak to stand up

I am so disappointed and extremely angry this is on the table, and makes no sense for our beautiful town…again…sounds like someone is looking out for their payoff

We are 100% against this proposal of a warehouse between Cherry Ave and Brookside

Kurt and Laurie Galvao
805-358-8208
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

52 Christina Taylor
From:Nicole Wheelwright
Sent:Tuesday, October 18, 2022 1:57 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:FW: Summit Warehouse

- Nicole

From: Mindy Tummler
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2022 1:37 PM
To: Nicole Wheelwright
Subject: Summit Warehouse

Vote No!!! Don't turn this city into another Moreno Valley. Listen to the community and vote it down and without another extension!!!
Sent from the all new AOL app for Android
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

53 Christina Taylor
From:[email protected]
Sent:Tuesday, October 18, 2022 2:12 PM
To:Christina Taylor; Carole Kendrick; Nicole Wheelwright; Rey Santos; Lloyd White; David Fenn; Julio Martinez
Subject:Diana Weber Says YES for Beaumont Summit Station Please Vote Yes for the Beaumont Summit Station project!

I am a Beaumont resident who supports Beaumont Summit Station because it provides $78 million in traffic funding that the city needs to fix our roads!

The project includes a commercial center along with three industrial buildings. Summit Station offers more benefits, such as jobs and retail amenities, than the housing plan.

Additionally, I support the project because it:

• Prevents an additional 1,640 daily trips on Brookside Ave • Contributes $10 million to a new 123-acre community park and sports complex • Preserves 30 acres of natural open space buffer between residential neighborhoods • Creates 2,800 new permanent jobs from industrial, retail, and restaurant businesses • Saves 112 million gallons of water per year

I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Diana Weber
92223
[email protected]
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

54 Christina Taylor
From:[email protected]
Sent:Tuesday, October 18, 2022 2:26 PM
To:Christina Taylor; Carole Kendrick; Nicole Wheelwright; Rey Santos; Lloyd White; David Fenn; Julio Martinez
Subject:Maria Lodichand Says YES for Beaumont Summit Station Please Vote Yes for the Beaumont Summit Station project!

I am a Beaumont resident who supports Beaumont Summit Station because it provides $78 million in traffic funding that the city needs to fix our roads!

The project includes a commercial center along with three industrial buildings. Summit Station offers more benefits, such as jobs and retail amenities, than the housing plan.

Additionally, I support the project because it:

• Prevents an additional 1,640 daily trips on Brookside Ave • Contributes $10 million to a new 123-acre community park and sports complex • Preserves 30 acres of natural open space buffer between residential neighborhoods • Creates 2,800 new permanent jobs from industrial, retail, and restaurant businesses • Saves 112 million gallons of water per year

I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Maria Lodichand
92223
[email protected]
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

55 Christina Taylor
From:[email protected]
Sent:Tuesday, October 18, 2022 2:42 PM
To:Christina Taylor; Carole Kendrick; Nicole Wheelwright; Rey Santos; Lloyd White; David Fenn; Julio Martinez
Subject:Sean Flynn Says YES for Beaumont Summit Station Please Vote Yes for the Beaumont Summit Station project!

I am a Beaumont resident who supports Beaumont Summit Station because it provides $78 million in traffic funding that the city needs to fix our roads!

The project includes a commercial center along with three industrial buildings. Summit Station offers more benefits, such as jobs and retail amenities, than the housing plan.

Additionally, I support the project because it:

• Prevents an additional 1,640 daily trips on Brookside Ave • Contributes $10 million to a new 123-acre community park and sports complex • Preserves 30 acres of natural open space buffer between residential neighborhoods • Creates 2,800 new permanent jobs from industrial, retail, and restaurant businesses • Saves 112 million gallons of water per year

I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Sean Flynn
92223
[email protected]
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

56 Christina Taylor
From:Kelly Lucia
Sent:Tuesday, October 18, 2022 2:45 PM
To:Greybar, Andrew
Cc:Christina Taylor; Carole Kendrick; Bonnie Johnson; Elizabeth Gibbs Subject:Re: Beaumont Summit Station Public Hearing - City of Calimesa Statement for the Public Record
Attachments:City of Calimesa_Statement on Beaumont Summit Station Project_10.18.2022 _revised.pdf
Hi Christina,

Please find attached a revised statement letter to be entered into the record. Please disregard the version sent today at 11:12 am.

Thank you,

Kelly Lucia, M. URP
Planning Director

Cell 909.809.8778 (preferred)
Office 909.795.9801 ext. 229
Email
[email protected]

From: Greybar, Andrew
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2022 12:55 PM
To: Kelly Lucia
Cc: Christina Taylor ; Carole Kendrick ; Bonnie Johnson ; Elizabeth Gibbs
Subject: Re: Beaumont Summit Station Public Hearing - City of Calimesa Statement for the Public Record

Kelly - Exeter has since provided this information requested to the City of Calimesa and requested that the City of Calimesa amend or retract their comment upon review.

Thank you,

Andrew Greybar
Senior Project Manager
EQT Exeter
M +1 708-341-9821
5060 N 40th St Suite 108
Phoenix, AZ 85018
[email protected]

57 On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 11:12 AM Kelly Lucia wrote:

Good morning Christina,

Please find attached the City of Calimesa's statement on the Beaumont Summit Station project. We request that this be entered into the record during tonight's public hearing please.

Thank you,

Kelly Lucia, M. URP
Planning Director

Cell 909.809.8778 (preferred)
Office 909.795.9801 ext. 229
Email
[email protected]

This message and any attachment(s) hereto are confidential and may be privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that you have received this message in error and that you must not - in whole or in part - review, copy, distribute, retain copies or disclose the contents of this message or any attachments hereto. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this message and any attachment from your system.

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

58 Christina Taylor
From:[email protected]
Sent:Tuesday, October 18, 2022 2:22 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Cc:Rey Santos; Lloyd White; David Fenn; Mike Lara; Julio Martinez; Christina Taylor; Carole Kendrick; Nicole Wheelwright
Subject:Warehouse Moratorium Ordinance
Attachments:Moratorium policy_Redlands.pdf
Hi Christina,

So nice to meet you at the town hall. This is a copy of the moratorium ordinance that Redlands adopted that I mentioned to you.

Sorry that it took me a while to get a copy.

I think our city would be well served to consider something similar and I will mention that tonight during public comment.

Pat Wayne
949-290-1811
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

59 Christina Taylor
From:Christine Vergara
Sent:Tuesday, October 18, 2022 2:59 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:Fwd: Beaumont Summit Station

Begin forwarded message:

From: Christine Vergara
Subject: Beaumont Summit Station
Date: October 16, 2022 at 3:37:55 PM PDT
To: [email protected]

To the Members of the City Council:

My husband and I would like to be on record as strongly opposing the proposed Summit Station Industrial Project.

We moved to Beaumont fourteen years ago in our retirement, drawn to this area for its beauty and quality of life. Over the ensuing years with every new warehouse project this area has seen, our air quality and our quality of life has diminished.

The last thing Beaumont needs is more warehouses. Our air quality is an issue that affects everyone-- every child playing sports in this air, every parent, every retiree in this community. Please consider all of us who live in this town and vote this proposal down.

Thank you,

Sincerely,

Arthur and Christine Vergara

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

60 Christina Taylor
From:Nicole Wheelwright
Sent:Tuesday, October 18, 2022 3:16 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:FW: Beaumont Summit Station Vote

- Nicole

From: Meagan
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2022 2:09 PM
To: Nicole Wheelwright
Subject: Beaumont Summit Station Vote

Please vote no on the Summit Station Warehouse Project. Long term effects of diesel exhaust particles are known causes of many health issues to include asthma and lung cancer. The impact of such health risks on our city's residents far outweighs the perceived "benefit" of this warehouse build.

Thank you,
Meagan Glauser
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

61 Christina Taylor
From:Nicole Wheelwright
Sent:Tuesday, October 18, 2022 3:16 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:FW: Summit Station

- Nicole
-
-----Original Message-----
From: Helen Garcia
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2022 2:20 PM
To: Nicole Wheelwright
Subject: Summit Station

I am opposed to the building of the Summit Station. The roads /freeway we have now are already so congested, I am really concerned what this plan will bring.

Sent from my iPad
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

62 Christina Taylor
From:Nicole Wheelwright
Sent:Tuesday, October 18, 2022 3:16 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:FW: regarding warehouses

- Nicole

From: CARL LEDFORD
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2022 2:34 PM
To: Nicole Wheelwright
Subject: regarding warehouses

This is in regards to the warehouses they are wanting to build between Cherry Valley Blvd and Brookside across from the two ones already built . I am a resident of Cherry Valley at Highland Springs Country Club. And we don't need any more traffic than has already been created in the two that have already been built . So we don't need any more to take our scenery away and traffic nightmare that this has created. I really hope this doesn't go thru to be built . Can you imagine having to get to the freeway and have 100 trucks lined up on Brookside put yourself in our shoes.

Thank you
Carl. Theresa Ledford
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

63 Christina Taylor
From:Nicole Wheelwright
Sent:Tuesday, October 18, 2022 3:16 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:FW: Summit Station Warehouse

- Nicole

From: Sue
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2022 2:38 PM
To: Nicole Wheelwright
Subject: Summit Station Warehouse

I will not be able to attend the Beaumont Council Tonight but I definitely want to voice my opinion. I DO NOT want anymore warehouses built on Cherry Valley Ave.!!!!! The mess and pollution we're already seeing from the building of the other warehouses is ridiculous- and the hundreds of trucks have not even started invading our -what USED to be- beautiful valley. Putting another warehouse will make it even worse and destroy the area (the 1st one is already doing that!) . Please do not allow another warehouse in our area. We were sold out before when the zoning was changed to allow the ones being build now. WE DO NOT NEED ANYMORE WAREHOUSES!!!!!!!

Thank you
Susan Gagnon
10760 Deerfield Dr.

Cherry Valley
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

64 Christina Taylor
From:Nicole Wheelwright
Sent:Tuesday, October 18, 2022 3:17 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:FW: Beaumont Summit Station Vote

- Nicole

From: Dustin Glauser
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2022 3:07 PM
To: Nicole Wheelwright
Subject: Beaumont Summit Station Vote

I would like to ask that you vote no on the Summit Station Warehouse project. The story I'm telling myself is that the cons out way the pros. Please consider my view on this matter during the vote tonight. Thank you.

-Dustin Glauser
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

65 Christina Taylor
From:Nicole Wheelwright
Sent:Tuesday, October 18, 2022 3:17 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:FW: VOTE NO FOR BEAUMONT SUMMIT STATION PROJECT!

- Nicole

From: jorge vewter
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2022 3:07 PM
To: Nicole Wheelwright
Subject: Re: VOTE NO FOR BEAUMONT SUMMIT STATION PROJECT!

Vote NO for the Beaumont Summit Station Project!

George Vawter
1013 Riviera Court
Beaumont Ca
92223
[email protected]

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

66 Christina Taylor
From:Nicole Wheelwright
Sent:Tuesday, October 18, 2022 4:00 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:FW: Summit Station

- Nicole

From: carolynr03
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2022 3:21 PM
To: Nicole Wheelwright
Subject: Summit Station

To those who can make a difference,

Please do not add another warehouse to the Cherry Valley, or northern Beaumont area. We have beautiful mountains and valleys to enjoy and view. We don't need to sell out our rural areas for warehouses and the traffic they will bring.

Please say no.

Thank you,
Carolyn Reinbolz

Sent via the Samsung Galaxy S8, an AT&T 5G Evolution capable smartphone

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

67 Christina Taylor
From:Nicole Wheelwright
Sent:Tuesday, October 18, 2022 4:00 PM
To:Christina Taylor
Subject:FW: City Council Meeting 10/18/22 - Public Hearing for Summit Station - Statement in Opposition

- Nicole

From: Kathleen Dale
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2022 3:47 PM
To: Nicole Wheelwright
Subject: City Council Meeting 10/18/22 - Public Hearing for Summit Station - Statement in Opposition

Please ensure that these comments are read into the record as part of this evening's public hearing.

I am a resident of Banning, but have a significant connection to Beaumont as my daughters, their husbands, and my five grandchildren all reside in Beaumont. We all regularly travel Cherry Valley Boulevard and Brookside Avenue as we travel between one another's homes, the kids' schools, and the kids' sports activities.

You have thousands and thousands of pages of information in front of you that make it very easy to lose focus on what really matters. If you step back and take a deep breath, there are two primary considerations that you need to resolve in deciding how to act on this matter.

First, is there a compelling reason to modify your General Plan to commit this land to warehouse development? The City has designated substantial lands along the 60 freeway for industrial development and upheld the current land use designations for this site in a fairly recent comprehensive General Plan update. My informed opinion is that the answer to this fundamental question is NO.

Second, is there a compelling reason to approve this substantial shift in land use policy despite the significant, unavoidable adverse air quality, noise and traffic impacts. The statement of overriding considerations justifications presented for your consideration focus on employment benefits and transportation funding. However, the City has already planned for sufficient employment-generating land use and, even with the improvements and money the project throws at roads, the impacts remain significant. My informed opinion is that the answer to this fundamental is also NO.

I respectfully request that the Beaumont City Council NOT certify the final EIR, NOT adopt a statement of overriding considerations, and DENY the various entitlement applications that comprise the Summit Station project.

Respectfully,

Kathleen Dale
Banning
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

← All documents from this meeting