Beaumont City Council
December 20, 2022

Traffic Signal Cost Estimate
Sheet 4 of 4
RK Engineering Group, Inc.

Date:January 31, 2020 Location:Highland Springs Ave. & Wilson/8th St.

City of BeaumontJob Number:2467-18-01
By:Prepared for:

Item No. Description Qty. Unit Unit Cost Item Cost

SUBTOTAL $47,214
Engineering/Mobilization 0.00%$0
Fees, Permits, Supervision 0.00%$0
Contingencies 15.00%$7,082
TOTAL $54,296
Robert Kahn R.C.E. No. 20285 Exp. 09/30/21
Date:Reviewed By:
4000 Westerly Place, Suite 280 ∙ Newport Beach, CA 92660 Phone: (949) 474-0809 ∙ Fax (949) 474-0902
01/31/20
SEAL

City of Beaumont
550 E. 6th Street
Beaumont, CA 92223
(951) 769-8520
www.ci.beaumont.ca.us

BOND EXONERATION APPLICATION
Bond Type: Performance Maintenance Final Monument Inspection Other:________

1. Contact’s Name ________________________________________Phone___________

2. Contact’s Address _______________________________________________________ City/State/Zip

5.Contact’s E-mail_________________________________________________________

3. Developer Name ______________________________________Phone____________ (If corporation or partnership application must include names of principal officers or partners)

4. Developer Address _____________________________________________________ City/St/Zip

5. Description of Bonds (including Bond Number, Tract Map/Application number, Lot number, and description of improvements covered):
________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________

6.CERTIFICATION OF ACCURACY AND COMPLETENESS: I hereby certify that to the best of my knowledge the information in this application and all attached answers and exhibits are true, complete, and correct.
________________________________________________________________________ Print Name and Sign – Contact/Applicant Date

7. Contractor shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City and its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against any and all liability, loss, damage, expense, costs (including without limitation costs and fees of litigation) of every nature arising out of or in connection with contractor’s performance of work hereunder or its failure to comply with any of its obligations for which this Bond exoneration is requested, except for such loss or damage which was caused by the active negligence of the City. ________________________________________________________________________ Print Name and Sign – Contact/Applicant Date
Case No. ________________
Receipt No. ______________
Fee $____________________
Date Paid ________________
PW2022-0941
3,484.43
Acct Transfer & R01276535
10/18/22 & 10/19/22

8. Developer/Contractor has completed all the following items prior to requesting release or has included them in the application.
 Remove and replace concrete and AC as needed where lifting.  Provide AC crack fill as needed. Crack fill/seal shall be hot asphaltic emulsion.  Provide Type II slurry coat for all road surfaces.
 Restore/Verify pavement striping/markings.
 Restore/Verify blue dots and signage as needed.
 Clean and camera sewer. Provide report and video copy of camera survey.  Provide all final geotechnical reports.
 Provide Engineers’ certification for line and grade within Right-of-Way.  Provide Landscape Architects Certification as required.

________________________________________________________________________ Print Name and Sign – Contact/Applicant Date

[COMPANY NAME]

Punch List

Project Name: Atwell Storm Drain Improvements Highland Springs Avenue West of Centerline from SCE Easement

Tract No. PW2022-0941
PW2022-0941 Bond No. CMS331829-M
Inspected By: Jason Craghead Page: 1 of 1 Date: 11/2/2022 Item
No. Description
Completed by
Construction
(Sign/Date)
Accepted by
(Sign/Date)
1 There are no items at this time

UNIT TOTAL
LF 4,620.00$
LF 4,230.00$
Each 6,500.00$
SF 5,010.00$
Each 1,000.00$
LF 2,450.00$
Each 1,000.00$
Each 1,000.00$
Each 6,000.00$
31,810.00$
4,771.50$
36,581.50$
36,581.50$
36,581.50$
Faithful Performance (100%)
Labor & Material (100%)

SUBTOTAL
15% Contingency
TOTAL
WCS−1 Connector Full Capture Device 1 1,000.00$
Junction Structure 2 3,000.00$
Remove Existing 24" RCP 49 50.00$
Flogard Plus Catch Basin Filter Insert 1 1,000.00$
Remove Existing Catch Basin w/ LD 1 1,000.00$
Catch Basin (W=24’) w/ Local Depression 1 6,500.00$
R&R Pavement in Kind 1,002 5.00$

UNIT PRICE

STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS
36" RCP 47 90.00$
14"x23" Elliptical RCP 66 70.00$

ITEM QUANTITY
(Subdivisions/Public Works/Commercial Projects)
Prepared By:MDS Consulting
Date Prepared:11/1/2019
Approved By:

Date Approved:

Tract No.:37298−1, Storm Drain
Highland Springs Avenue
City of Beaumont Engineering Division
Construction Cost Estimate for Bonding, Plan Check & Inspection Fees

I:\89404\TECH DOCS\Construction Cost Est\City of Beaumont\2019-1101 89404 TR 37298-1 COST EST (HSA Storm Drain Beaumont).xlsx Cost Estimate approved for Bonding purposes
-Padma Asam, NV5, 11/4/19
Pending changes to mylars over the counter.

25732575260426032602260426032
6 02
260126062
6 0
2 2
6 0
3 2
6 04
261
0 261026
0 4
26 0
3 26
0 2
2625
26032635
2630
2630
2630
2635
2640
2645
2645
2645
2640
2640
2630
26102610261026102610261026102640
261026152607260826072608 2609
26062606
2 6
0 5 26052606260526042605
26062610 2607260926082607260826092607260826092610260
7 2607
260
6 2607 26042605260626052606260726062
6 0
8 26
1 0260426042603 2625
2640
2622262026202
622
2605
2635
2635
2635
2635
2635
2637
26372630
263526452645263026252623
26232620
2620
2620
2620
26152615
2615
261026052
6 0
0 26052605260526
0 1 260426042604260426002600260026002607
26052
6052605 26052605260
5 2605H
W
L
HW
L

HWLHWLHWLHWLHWLHWLHWLHWLHWLHWLHWLH
W
L
2585
2575
2580
2573
25702573.4 WSE2573.4 WSE2573.4 WSE2573.4 WSE
2620.6 WSE
2620.6 W
S
E
2636.
2 3

W
S
E
2570257325752575258025732570260226
1 5
2610
2635
2640
26 3
6 .
2 3
W
S
E
2 5
8 0
25752570
2573
2570HWL26052
6 2
5 263026
2 0
2620
2622
26202622
2630
2640
264026002600
2600260426032603
260
4 26022601260226012606 2607261526202635
26402645
2625
260626072605HWL2
635
2 5
7 5 262526302
6 3
5 2640264526502655266026652
6 7
0 2675268026262526252625
2625
2625262526
2 5
2625263026302630
26302630
2 6
3 5
26352635
2635
263526
4 0
2640
2640
26402640
2640264026452645264526452645
264526452
6 4
5 26452650265026502650
26502650265026502655265526552655
265526552655
2655
265526552660266026602660
2660
2660
26602660
2660
26 6
0 26602660266526652665266526652665
2665
2665
2665266526652
670267026702670
26 7
0 26702670
2670267526752675267526752675
26 7
5 26752675268026802680268026802680
2680
26852685268526
8 5
2685
2685 2690260026152615
2615
26152615262026202620 26202620
262
0 26
2 0262026
2 0
2620262026252625
26 3
0 2635
26352635 2640
25802580
2580
258
0 258025
8 0
258
5 25852585258
5 25
8 525902590 2590
2590
2590
2590
2595
2595259
5 2595259526002600
26002600
2 6
0 0
2 6
0 0
2605
26052605
2605
2605
260526052610
26102610
26102610
261026
1 0
2615
26152615
2620
2620
25 7
5 2575 257525752575257525602565260026
0 0WILSON STREETP.A. 17
PA 3PA 26SCHOOL SITEPA 17LOT 3COMMERCIALPA 4PA 18PA 9BLOT 1COMMERCIALPA 20PA 22LOT 4MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIALPARKLOT 5LINE 'P2'LINE 'N'1234559606189101112131415161718192021222324252627282932333435363738394041424344454647484950515253545556576263666768697475767778798081868788899091929397989910010110210310410510610710810911011182838485123689101113141516171819202122232425262728293035363738394041424344454647485051525354555657585961626364656667686970717273747576778182838485861234567101112131617181920212324252627282930323334353839434445464849505152535455575887LOT 'M'OPEN SPACE33114115116117118119120PA 23CB #P2CB #P1CB #N1CB #N2WQMP AND STORMDETENTION BASIN"J"SEDIMENTBASIN "I"STORMDETENTIONBASIN "G"SEDIMENTBASIN "F"LOT 2MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL37PA 35ASEDIMENTBASIN "M"EXTENDED DETENTIONBASIN #2(BMP)EARTHENBERMEARTHENBERMSEDIMENTBASIN "A"PA 2ATR. NO. 37298TR. NO. 37298-2PA 1ATR. NO. 37298-3PA 1BEXTENDED DETENTIONBASIN #4(BMP)SMITH CREEK2231473656 12SMITH CREEKATWELL DRIVELANDMARK WAYLAN D
M
A
R
K

W
A

Y MEADOWLINE WAYSWIFT DR

APEX STREET COURTCREEKSIDE AVENUE TWILIGHT DRREBLOOM DRLOT 'AA'LOT 'X'LOT 'Y'LOT 'P'LOT'U'LOTREDBUD AVE QUAI
L

WAYVERDE WAYH
A
Z
E
L

L
A
N

ELOT 'W'LOT 'T'LOT 'R''O'LOT 'N'LOT'V'LOTHARMONY WAYBANBURY LANETIMBER WAYCOO L
W
A
T
E
R

W
A

YAURAL PLACESIERRA PLACEPINYON LANE
MALLOW

WAYTREELINE
LOT 'S'4911211334333231EXTENDED DETENTIONBASIN #7(BMP)STORM DETENTIONBASIN #1EXTENDED DETENTIONBASIN #1B(BMP)EXTENDED DETENTIONBASIN #1C(BMP)EXTENDED DETENTIONBASIN #1A(BMP)HIGHLAND SPRINGS AVENUE EXISTING30CB #P1aEXISTING 24" SDEXISTING 12'(W) X 7'(H) RCBPER CHANNEL PLANS, STAGE 3DWG. NO. 5-202EXTENDEDDETENTION BASIN #3(BMP)LINE 'P1'3LOT 'CC''Q'PARKLOT 6EVENFALL DRIVE1IN THE CITY OF BANNING, STATE OF CALIFORNIATRACT NO. 37298-1HIGHLAND SPRINGS AVE. STORM DRAIN (1"=300')03003001506001200SHEET INDEXTRACT BOUNDARYTOP OF CURBTBTCFINISH SURFACEFSRADIUSRDELTALENGTHLEXISTINGEX.FLOW LINEFLRIGHT-OF-WAYR/WPROPOSED ELEVATION600.00EXISTING ELEVATION(600.00)TOP OF GRATETGBEGINNING OF CURVEBCEND OF CURVEECGRADE BREAKGBINVERTINV.PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTP.U.E.PROPOSEDPROP.POINT OF COMPOUND CURVEPCCPOINT OF REVERSE CURVEPRCSTREETST.CENTERLINECINTERSECTIONINT.SHEETSHT.CATCH BASINC.B.ON CENTERO.C.NORTHERLYN'LYEASTERLYE'LYSOUTHERLYS'LYNUMBERNO.WESTERLYW'LYCUBIC FEET PER SECONDCFSVELOCITYVQ100RCPM.H.J.S.HGL100 YEAR STORMREINFORCED CONCRETE PIPEMANHOLEJUNCTION STRUCTUREHYDRAULIC GRADE LINEABBREVIATIONS:GRATE INLETG.I.M.O.S.MIDDLE OF STRUCTURETOP OF RETAINING WALLTRWNEG.NEGLIGIBLETOP OF APRONTABOT.BOTTOMWATER TIGHT PIPE JOINTW.T.OR CONNECTIONL408-120-001 THROUGH -005, -007 THROUGH -009PORTIONS OF 408-120-006, -010, -012, -019, -020ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBERSTHE BEARINGS FOR THIS SURVEY ARE BASED ON THE LINE BETWEEN STATIONS "TRAK" AND"MATH" (PORTIONS PER NATIONAL GEODETIC SURVEY, NAD 83, EPOCH 1995.5), AS SHOWN ONTHE MAP FILED IN BOOK 102, PAGES 50 THROUGH 65 OF RECORDS OF SURVEY, IN THE OFFICE OFTHE COUNTY RECORDER OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, BEING NORTH 52° 49' 02.84" EAST.BASIS OF BEARINGSTRACT NO. 37298-1, OFF-SITE STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENT PLAN MDS File: 89404-SD SHT-01(Title).dwgPlot Scale: 0.386863 Dwg Scale: ----Plot Date: 09.09.2020 2:38:10 PM By: Station166 MDS Proj. Data: I:\89404\ENGINEERING\Plans\Storm Drain\Offsite (Highland Springs)Created: 09.01.2020 11:32:17 AM Author:----Last Edit: 09.01.2020 11:32:17 AM By: Station166REVISIONSMARKAPPRDATECall before you D gW.O. No.CIP No.PROJECT No.SHEET OF 5OFF-SITE STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENT PLANTRACT NO. 37298-1M O R S ES C H U L T ZVoice: 949-251-8821P L A N N E R SE N G I N E E R S S U R V E Y O R S17320 Redhill AvenueSuite 350Irvine, CA 92614PLANS PREPARED BY:SUBMITTED BY:EDWARD J. LENTHRCE# 052496 EXP. 12-31-20DATEAPPROVED BY:ARTURO VELA, RCE #75696PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR/CITY ENGINEERDATECITY OF BANNINGEXP. 6/30/20RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL BY:KEVIN D. SIN, RCE #71299SENIOR CIVIL ENGINEERDATEEXP. 12/31/219-9-2020TITLE SHEET/VICINITY MAPNOT TO SCALEWILSON STREETCHERRY VALLEYBEAUMONTINTERSTATE 10RAMSEY STREETHIGHLAND SPRINGS AVE.

BOULEVARD
HIGHLAND HOME RD.COUNTY OFRIVERSIDEBANNINGPROJECTSITE8TH STREET6TH STREETSUNLAKESBLVD.WESTWARD AVE.BROOKSIDE AVE.DUTTON STREETBELLFLOWER AVE.

SUNSET AVE.LINCOLN ST.PENNSYLVANIA AVE.

SAN GORGONIO AVE.

N HARGRAVE ST.MORO
NGO

R
D
.E GEORGE ST.INTERSTATE 10OAK VALLEY PRKY.PALM AVE.

BEAUMONT AVE.

LA
M
B
CANY
O
N
RD.60101022NDST.IMPROVEMENT PLAN STAFF ENGINEERPUBLIC WORKS DEPART., ENGINEERING DIVISIONDATEREVIEWED BY:CITY ENGINEERDATERECOMMENDED FORAPPROVAL BY:DATEAPPROVED BY:CITY OF BEAUMONT SHEET NO.TITLE SHEET, INDEX MAPINDEXPLAN & PROFILE STORM DRAIN LINE 'N', LINE 'P1' & 'P2'1LOCAL DEPRESSION DETAILS 2CONSTRUCTION NOTES & QUANTITY ESTIMATES 23PARDEE HOMES1250 CORONA POINTE COURT, SUITE 600CORONA, CA 92879(951) 428-4400CONTACT: MICHAEL HEISHMANOWNER/APPLICANT/DEVELOPERUTILITIESFSFINISH SURFACEOAK VALLEYPARKWAYTTM NO. 37390VACANT(ATWELL)TTM NO. 37390VACANT(ATWELL)TTM NO. 37389VACANT(ATWELL)EXISTINGHIGHLANDSPRINGSCHANNEL8THSTREETTRACT NO. 30332-2SUNDANCESINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TRACT NO. 30332-4SUNDANCESINGLE-FAMILYRESIDENTIALPM NO. 35789SUNDANCE CORPORATECOMMERCIAL STARLIGHTAVENUESUNDANCEDRIVECITY OF BEAUMONTEXISTINGHIGHLAND

CITY OF BANNINGSPRINGSCHANNEL
DETAILS4-5LEGAL DESCRIPTIONELEVATIONS OF UTILITIES ARE APPROXIMATE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.12.20.19.18.17.16.14.GENERAL NOTES1.2.3.4.5.6.7.9.10.13.8.11.15.WHERE NOTED THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSTRUCT THE STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS INCONFORMANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATIONDISTRICT'S M.O.U. STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS DATED JUNE 24, 2008, AND RCFC&WCD STANDARD MANUAL. FOR THE LATESTDRAWINGS OF THE STANDARD MANUAL, PLEASE REFER TO THE "PUBLICATIONS AND RECORDS" PAGE FOUND ON THEDISTRICT'S WEBSITE.CONTACT THE ENCROACHMENT PERMIT ENGINEER AT 951.922.3130 IF AN ENCROACHMENT PERMIT IS REQUIRED FROM CITY OFBANNING. AFTER THE PERMIT IS ISSUED THE CITY OF BANNING MUST BE NOTIFIED ONE WEEK PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.ALL STATIONING REFERS TO CENTERLINE OF CONSTRUCTION UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.STATIONING FOR LATERALS AND CONNECTOR PIPES REFER TO THE CENTERLINE INTERSECTION STATIONS.FORTY-EIGHT HOURS BEFORE EXCAVATION, CALL UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT 1.800.227.2600.ALL ELEVATIONS SHOWN ARE IN FEET AND DECIMALS THEREOF BASED ON THE NATIONAL GEODETIC VERTICAL DATUM (NAVD 88).ALL COORDINATES ARE SHOWN IN FEET AND DECIMALS THEREOF BASED ON THE NORTH AMERICAN DATUM (NAD 83),CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM (CCS), ZONE 6 AND EPOCH (1995.5).OPENINGS RESULTING FROM THE CUTTING OR PARTIAL REMOVAL OF EXISTING CULVERTS, PIPES OR SIMILAR STRUCTURESTO BE ABANDONED SHALL BE SEALED WITH 6" OF CLASS "B" CONCRETE.PIPE CONNECTED TO THE MAINLINE PIPE SHALL CONFORM TO JUNCTION STRUCTURE NO. 4 (JS 229) UNLESSOTHERWISE NOTED."V" IS THE DEPTH OF CATCH BASINS MEASURED FROM THE TOP OF CURB TO INVERT OF CONNECTOR PIPE.CATCH BASINS SHALL BE LOCATED SO THAT LOCAL DEPRESSION SHALL BEGIN AT EXISTING CURB RETURN JOINT,UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED.ALL CURBS, GUTTERS, SIDEWALKS, DRIVEWAYS AND OTHER EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS TO BE RECONSTRUCTED IN KINDAND AT THE SAME ELEVATION AND LOCATION AS THE EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.STANDARD DRAWINGS CALLED FOR ON THE PLAN AND PROFILE SHALL CONFORM TO RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOODCONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT STANDARD DRAWINGS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.THE CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO CALL ALL UTILITY AGENCIES REGARDING TEMPORARY SHORING AND SUPPORTREQUIREMENTS FOR THE VARIOUS UTILITY LINES SHOWN ON THESE PLANS.DURING ROUGH GRADING OPERATIONS AND PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION OF PERMANENT DRAINAGE STRUCTURES, TEMPORARYDRAINAGE CONTROL SHOULD BE PROVIDED TO PREVENT PONDING WATER AND DAMAGE TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES.APPROVAL OF THESE PLANS BY THE CITY OF BANNING DOES NOT RELIEVE THE DEVELOPER'S ENGINEER OF RESPONSIBILITYFOR THE ENGINEERING DESIGN. IF FIELD CHANGES ARE REQUIRED, IT WILL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE DESIGN ENGINEERTO MAKE THE NECESSARY CORRECTIONS.THE CONTRACTOR OR DEVELOPER SHALL SECURE ALL REQUIRED ENCROACHMENT AND/OR STATE AND FEDERALREGULATORY PERMITS PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY WORK.THE CONCRETE COATING ON THE INSIDE OF ALL REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPES MUST BE INCREASED TO PROVIDE A MINIMUMOF 1-1/2 INCHES OVER THE REINFORCING AND INCREASED TO A MINIMUM OF 3-1/2 INCHES OVER THE REINFORCING FOR BOXCULVERT, WHEN DESIGN VELOCITIES EXCEED 20 FEET PER SECOND. THE CONCRETE DESIGN STRENGTH IN THESE REACHESSHALL BE F'C=5,000 PSI FOR VELOCITIES EXCEEDING 20 FEET PER SECOND ANDF'C=6,000 PSI FOR VELOCITIES EXCEEDING 30 FEET PER SECOND.CONSTRUCTION JOINT PER CALTRANS STANDARD REINFORCED CONCRETE BOX SHALL BE PLACED ACCORDINGTO RCFC&WCD STANDARD DRAWING NO. BX401.WATERCITY OF BANNING99 EAST RAMSEY STREETBANNING, CA. 92220(951) 922-3281SEWERCITY OF BANNING99 EAST RAMSEY STREETBANNING, CA. 92220(951) 922-3281ELECTRICCITY OF BANNING176 EAST LINCOLN STREETBANNING, CA. 92220(951) 922-3260GASSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY1981 WEST LUGONIA AVENUEREDLANDS, CA. 92374(909) 792-2187TRASHCITY OF BANNING99 EAST RAMSEY STREETBANNING, CA. 92220(951) 922-3130TELEPHONEFRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS280 SOUTH LOCUST STREETPOMONA, CA. 92363(909) 397-0042CABLESPECTRUM CABLE7337 CENTRAL AVENUERIVERSIDE, CA 92504(951) 329-9487STORM DRAINCITY OF BANNING99 EAST RAMSEY STREETBANNING, CA. 92220(951) 922-3130Co WASTE MANAGEMENTLEGEND:TRACT BOUNDARYPROPOSED CURB & GUTTEREXISTING CURB & GUTTERSTREET CENTERLINEFLOW LINEPROPOSED STORM DRAINEXISTING STORM DRAINEXISTING SANITARY SEWEREXISTING DOMESTIC WATER MAINEXISTING NON-POTABLE WATER MAINPROPOSED SANITARY SEWERPROPOSED NON-POTABLE WATER MAINPROPOSED WATER MAIN8" SS16" NW8" WEX. 8" SEX. 16" WEX. 16" NWCONSTRUCTION NOTEPROPOSED SIDEWALKSTREET LIGHTFIRE HYDRANTWATER SERVICESEWER SERVICE5SHEET INDEX NUMBEREX. 24" SDRIGHT-OF-WAYCATVEX. TELE.CABLE TVEXISTING TELEPHONE LINEEXISTING GAS LINEEX. 8"GR/WR/WEX. ELEC.EXISTING ELECTRICLOTS 1-7, 10; AND PORTIONS OF LOTS 8, 9, 10, 18, & 19; OF TRACT MAP NO. 34330,FILED IN BOOK 429 OF MAPS, PAGES 84 THROUGH 103, INCLUSIVE, IN THE OFFICEOF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.EXISTING 13'(W) X 4'(H) RCBCITY BOUNDARYCITY BOUNDARYAPEX ST.NO. 20058PARCEL MAPRESIDENTIALA.P.N. 419-050-018MEMORIAL HOSPITALSAN GORGONIO43/14-15PARCEL MAPNO. 20793PARCEL MAP INDEX MAPSCALE: 1"=300'PER PLANS DWG. NO. 5-202TRACT NO. 30332-3SUNDANCESINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIALTRACT NO. 31468-2SUNDANCESINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIALELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON BENCHMARK MWD 401 1992 - A 3 ¼” STANDARD ALUMINUM MWDDISK, FLUSH, IN BANNING, 0.6 MILES SOUTH ALONG HIGHLAND SPRINGS AVENUE FROM THE INTERSECTION OFHIGHLAND SPRINGS AVENUE AND THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD BRIDGE, 17.5 FEET EAST OF THECENTERLINE OF HIGHLAND SPRINGS AVENUE AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF CATCH BASIN AT THE TOP OFCURB, 0.5 FEET EAST OF FACE OF CURB. ELEVATION = 772.395m = 2534.10 ft (NAVD 88).CONVERSION TO NGVD 29 CAN BE ACCOMPLISHED BY SUBTRACTING 2.66 ft FROM ALL ELEVATIONS PERVERTCON CALCULATION AT THE BENCHMARK. ELEVATION = 2531.44 ft (NGVD 29).BENCH MARK18.THE CONTRACTOR OR DEVELOPER SHALL SECURE ALL REQUIRED ENCROACHMENT AND/OR STATE AND FEDERALREGULATORY PERMITS PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY WORK.CALIFORNIA COORDINATESCENTER LINE HIGHLAND SPRING AVE & WILSON STREETN 2283766.54E 6350263.54CENTER LINE INTERSECTION HIGHLAND SPRING AVE & SUNDANCE DRIVEN 2286406.55E 6350271.59CCS ZONE 6MATH (LAKE MATHEWS)N 2257398.558E 6201355.292TRAK (BOMMER CANYON)N 2171990.406E 6088762.992RECOMMENDED FOR ACCEPTANCE BY:___________________________________________________________STEVEN LATINO, PE.ENGINEERING RESOURCES OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, INC.1REV. SD LINE P1, ADD SD LINE P2, REV. DETAIL FOR C.B #P1, P1a & P2REV. USW-1 CONNECTOR PIPE SCREEN DETAILS. REV. FLOGARD DETAILLINE 'P3'3A2ADD SD LINE P3, REV. SD LINE P2, REV. SD LINE NPLAN & PROFILE STORM DRAIN LINE 'P3'3A3REV. PROFILE SD LINE P1, P2 & P3, ADD TRANSITION STRUCTURE39/16/20FOR DELTA 3 ONLY09/16/2009/16/203292BPage 293 of 877

2LOCAL DEPRESSION DETAILSSCALE: 1"=10''SUMP CONDITIONW=4'6'6'671.94 TC 671.27 FL8" CF
671.82 TC
670.82 FL12" CF
671.77 TC
670.77 FL
12" CF
8" CF 671.77 TC
671.10 FL
FLOW BY CONDITIONW=28'6'3'673.14 TC
672.47 FL8" CF
673.21 TC
672.21 FL12" CF
673.85 TC
672.85 FL12" CF
8" CF 673.99 TC
673.32 FLFLOW BY CONDITIONFLOW BY CONDITION6'3'606.47 TC 605.47 FL
12" CF
8" CF 606.55 TC
605.88 FL
605.68 TC
605.01 FL8" CF
605.72 TC
604.72 FL12" CF
605.56 TC
604.56 FL12" CF
C.B. 15+20.00
8" CF 605.52 TC
604.85 FL
606.01 TC
605.34 FL8" CF
605.92 TC
604.92 FL12" CF
TRACT NO. 37298-1, OFF-SITE STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENT PLAN MDS File: 89404-SD SHT-01(Title).dwgPlot Scale: 0.386863 Dwg Scale: ----Plot Date: 07.17.2019 1:36:51 PM By: Station166 MDS Proj. Data: I:\89404\ENGINEERING\Plans\Storm Drain\Offsite (Highland Springs)Created: 09.01.2020 11:32:17 AM Author:----Last Edit: 09.09.2020 02:21:53 PM By: Station166REVISIONSMARKAPPRDATECall before you D gW.O. No.CIP No.PROJECT No.SHEET OF 5OFF-SITE STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENT PLANTRACT NO. 37298-1M O R S ES C H U L T ZVoice: 949-251-8821P L A N N E R SE N G I N E E R S S U R V E Y O R S17320 Redhill AvenueSuite 350Irvine, CA 92614PLANS PREPARED BY:SUBMITTED BY:EDWARD J. LENTHRCE# 052496 EXP. 12-31-20DATEAPPROVED BY:ARTURO VELA, RCE #75696PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR/CITY ENGINEERDATECITY OF BANNINGEXP. 6/30/20RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL BY:KEVIN D. SIN, RCE #71299SENIOR CIVIL ENGINEERDATEEXP. 12/31/219-9-2020CONSTRUCTION NOTES & ESTIMATED QUANTITIES:213CONSTRUCT CATCH BASIN NO. 1 PER RCFC & WCD STD. DWG. NO. CB1001604CONSTRUCT LOCAL DEPRESSION PER RCFC & WCD STD. DWG. NO. LD201 AND DETAILS HEREON.9755427REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING CATCH BASIN8REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING LOCAL DEPRESSION22W= 4.0'W=24.0'13CONSTRUCT JUNCTION STRUCTURE NO. 1 PER RCFC& WCD STD. DWG. NO. JS226AND LOCAL DEPRESSION DETAILSCONSTRUCTION NOTES, QUANTITIESCL C.B. 15+20.00 FLOW1.36%CL C.B. 53+11.87
FLOW2.20%CL C.B. 11+00.67
41123111112 --7-39121EA.LFLFEA.EA.EA.EA.EA.EA.10REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING 24" RCP32257LF11514EA.FLOGARD CATCH BASIN INSERT FILTER(CURB OPENING INLET)STAFF ENGINEERPUBLIC WORKS DEPART., ENGINEERING DIVISIONDATEREVIEWED BY:CITY ENGINEERDATERECOMMENDED FORAPPROVAL BY:DATEAPPROVED BY:CITY OF BEAUMONT 12INSTALL USW-1 CONNECTOR FULL CAPTURE DEVICE PER DETAILS ON SHEET NO. 4 AND SHEET NO. 5 TO BE MAINTAINED BY THE CITY514EA.FLOW1.44%W=24'L=8'CL C.B. 15+52.00 C.B. P1
C.B. P1a
W=28.0'1-1EA.1REMOVE AND REPLACE AC PAVEMENT OVER BASE IN KIND PER CITY STD. NO. S-172,6611,3221,339SFINSTALL FLOGARD CATCH BASIN INSERT FILTER PER OLDCASTLE STORMWATER SOLUTIONS(SIZE PER PLAN) OR APPROVED EQUAL, DETAILS ON THIS SHEET.606.13 TC 605.13 FL12" CF
606.03 TC
605.03 FL12" CF11 LOCAL DEPRESSION CASE 'C'LOCAL DEPRESSION CASE 'C'LOCAL DEPRESSION CASE 'C'LOCAL DEPRESSION CASE 'A'60 0 .
2 4

I
N
V
S=0.0200601.
1 4

I
N
V
131406377LFM.H3M.HM.HM.H333344441311MAINTAINED BY CITYALSO SEE DETAILS ON STREET IMPROVEMENT PLAN.56--1-11-2723-940-1(2000-D)S=0.0050MAINTAINED BY CITY OF BANNINGMAINTAINED BY CITY OF BANNINGMAINTAINED BY CITY OF BANNINGMAINTAINED BY CITY OF BEAUMONT14873948LF4815946048LF4816INSTALL CONCRETE COLLAR PER RCFC& WCD STD. DWG. NO. M8031-1EA.1102CONSTRUCT 18” RCP STORM DRAIN (D-LOAD PER PROFILE) WITH SLURRY CEMENT BACKFILL IN OUTERBEDDING AND HAUNCH AREAS PER CALTRANS STD. DWG. NO. A62DA.CONSTRUCT 36” RCP STORM DRAIN (D-LOAD PER PROFILE) WITH SLURRY CEMENT BACKFILL IN OUTERBEDDING AND HAUNCH AREAS PER CALTRANS STD. DWG. NO. A62DA.CONSTRUCT 14”X23” ELLIPTICAL PIPE STORM DRAIN (D-LOAD PER PROFILE) WITH SLURRY CEMENTBACKFILL IN OUTER BEDDING AND HAUNCH AREAS PER CALTRANS STD. DWG. NO. A62DA.CONSTRUCT 22"x34" ELLIPTICAL PIPE STORM DRAIN (D-LOAD PER PROFILE) WITH SLURRY CEMENTBACKFILL IN OUTER BEDDING AND HAUNCH AREAS PER CALTRANS STD. DWG. NO. A62DA.CONSTRUCT 19"x30" ELLIPTICAL PIPE STORM DRAIN (D-LOAD PER PROFILE) WITH SLURRY CEMENTBACKFILL IN OUTER BEDDING AND HAUNCH AREAS PER CALTRANS STD. DWG. NO. A62DA.59 9 .
4 8

I
N
V
59 9
.
3 8

I
N
VCONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY EXISTING UTILITYLOCATION AND ELEVATION PRIOR TO BEGINING OF CONSTRUCTION.*6CONSTRUCT 24” RCP STORM DRAIN (D-LOAD PER PROFILE) WITH SLURRY CEMENT BACKFILL IN OUTER BEDDING AND HAUNCH AREAS PER CALTRANS STD. DWG. NO. A62DA. 6-6LF61REV. SD LINE P1, ADD SD LINE P2, REV. DETAIL FOR C.B #P1, P1a & P2REV. FLOGARD DETAILSPECIFIER CHARTMODEL NO.Curb OpeningWidth- W -FGP-24CI2.0' (24")2.5' (30")3.0' (36")3.5' (42")4.0' (48")5.0' (60")6.0' (72")7.0' (84")8.0' (96")10.0' (120")12.0' (144")14.0' (168")16.0' (192")18.0' (216")21.0' (252")24.0' (288")StorageCapacity- Cu. Ft. -.951.201.501.802.102.403.053.654.254.856.107.308.559.4510.9512.20FilteredFlow Rate- GPM/CFS -338 / .75450 / 1.00563 / 1.25675 / 1.50768 / 1.76900 / 2.001,126 / 2.511,350 / 3.011,576 / 3.511,800 / 4.012,252 / 5.022,700 / 6.023.152 / 7.023,490 / 7.784,050 / 9.024,504 / 10.04FGP-30CIFGP-36CIFGP-42CIFGP-48CIFGP-5.0CIFGP-6.0CIFGP-7.0CIFGP-8.0CIFGP-10.0CIFGP-12.0CIFGP-14.0CIFGP-16.0CIFGP-18.0CIFGP-21.0CIFGP-24.0CIDETAIL AABSECTION B-BSECTION A-AWFILTER LINER &SUPPORT BASKET.FILTER LINER &SUPPORT BASKET.FloGarddFILTER FRAME.MOUNTING BRACKET.EXPANSIONBOLT.CURBOPENINGFOSSIL ROCKfABSORBENT POUCH.FloGardd CURB INLETFILTER ASSEMBLY.FloGarddCURB INLET FILTERASSEMBLY.BSEE DETAIL AOUTLETRUBBER GASKETS.CATCHBASIN.CATCH BASIN.CURBOPENING.12"BypassFlow Rate- GPM/CFS -2,513 / 5.63,008 / 6.73,547 / 7.93,951 / 8.84,445 / 9.95,208 / 11.66,196 / 13.87,139 / 15.98,082 / 18.09,833 / 21.911,764 / 26.213,515 / 30.115,446 / 34.417,152 / 38.219,891 / 44.323,528 / 52.4FGP-0002SHEET 1 OF 1DRAWING NO.FGP-0002DATEJPR 1/3/06REVECOETHIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF OLDCASTLE PRECAST, INC. IT IS SUBMITTED FOR REFERENCE PURPOSES ONLY AND SHALL NOT BEUSED IN ANY WAY INJURIOUS TO THE INTERESTS OF SAID COMPANY. COPYRIGHT © 2010 OLDCASTLE PRECAST, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.ECO-0127JPR 5/18/15FloGarddCatch Basin Insert FilterCurb Inlet Style7921 Southpark Plaza, Suite 200 | Littleton, CO | 80120 | Ph: 800.579.8819 | oldcastlestormwater.comStormwater SolutionsdAInletFiltrationNOTES:1.Filter insert shall have a high flow bypass feature.2.Filter support frame shall be constructed from stainless steelType 304.3.Filter medium shall be Fossil Rockf, installed andmaintained in accordance with manufacturer specifications.4.Storage capacity reflects 80% of maximum solids collectionprior to impeding filtering bypass.28.0' (336")14.605,400 / 12.03FGP-28.0CI26,311 / 58.6101212123X599.48 INV2ADD SD LINE P3, REV. SD LINE P2, REV. SD LINE NCL 17CONSTRUCT TRANSITION STRUCTURE NO. 3 PER RCFC& WCD STD. DWG. NO. TS30311EA.133REV. PROFILE SD LINE P1, P2, ADD TRANSITION STRUCTURE33EX. 24" RCP LINE "P1"3333W=24'6 0 0
.
6 6

I
N
VEX. 24" SDSEE SHEET 3LINE "P1"15600.37 INV*166(600.22 INV)22'6 0 0
.
6 2

I
N
V LINE "P2"SEE SHEET 355'6'EX. LDEX. EDGEOF GUTTEREX. CURBLINE "P3"SEE SHEET 3A5'600.37 INV 6'13'6'LINE "P2"SEE SHEET 3SEE SHEET 3LINE "P1"15106'W=24'5'22'5'EX. CURBEX. LDEX. EDGEOF GUTTER5LINE "P3"599.48 INVSEE SHEET 3A6'11715159/16/20FOR DELTA 3 ONLY09/16/2009/16/203292BPage 294 of 877

TRACT NO. 37298-1, OFF-SITE STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENT PLAN MDS File: 89404-SD SHT-03.dwgPlot Scale: 0.386863 Dwg Scale: ----Plot Date: 09.09.2020 5:34:53 PM By: STATION114 MDS Proj. Data: I:\89404\ENGINEERING\Plans\Storm Drain\Offsite (Highland Springs)Created: 09.09.2020 03:50:48 PM Author:----Last Edit: 09.09.2020 03:50:48 PM By: Station166REVISIONSMARKAPPRDATECall before you D gW.O. No.CIP No.PROJECT No.SHEET OF 5OFF-SITE STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENT PLANTRACT NO. 37298-1M O R S ES C H U L T ZVoice: 949-251-8821P L A N N E R SE N G I N E E R S S U R V E Y O R S17320 Redhill AvenueSuite 350Irvine, CA 92614PLANS PREPARED BY:SUBMITTED BY:EDWARD J. LENTHRCE# 052496 EXP. 12-31-20DATEPROFILE SCALES1"=40'VERT. 1"=4'PLAN SCALEHORIZ. 1"=40'APPROVED BY:ARTURO VELA, RCE #75696PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR/CITY ENGINEERDATECITY OF BANNINGEXP. 6/30/20RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL BY:KEVIN D. SIN, RCE #71299SENIOR CIVIL ENGINEERDATEEXP. 12/31/219-9-2020123LINE "N"LINEBEARINGDISTANCEL1N 49°01'26" E150.99'L2LINE TABLE610600590CONSTRUCTION NOTES:12680670660L3N 89°49'39" W14.02'N 10°00'00" E19.44'12LINE "P1" & "P2"HIGHLAND SPRINGS AVENUECONSTRUCT CATCH BASIN NO. 1 PER RCFC & WCD STD. DWG. NO. CB100346806706603LINE "N"LINE "P2"LINE "N", LINE "P1" & "P2"REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING CATCH BASIN7REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING LOCAL DEPRESSION8610600590CONSTRUCT JUNCTION STRUCTURE NO. 1 PER RCFC& WCD STD. DWG. NO. JS2269CURVE TABLE # DELTA R L TCONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY EXISTING UTILITYLOCATION AND ELEVATION PRIOR TO BEGINING OF CONSTRUCTION.*REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING 24" RCP10HIGHLAND SPRINGS AVENUE11STAFF ENGINEERPUBLIC WORKS DEPART., ENGINEERING DIVISIONDATEREVIEWED BY:CITY ENGINEERDATERECOMMENDED FORAPPROVAL BY:DATEAPPROVED BY:CITY OF BEAUMONT INSTALL FLOGARD CATCH BASIN INSERT FILTER PER OLDCASTLE STORMWATER SOLUTIONS(SIZE PER PLAN) OR APPROVED EQUAL, DETAILS ON SHEET 212INSTALL USW-1 CONNECTOR FULL CAPTURE DEVICE PER DETAILS ON SHEET NO. 4AND NO. 5 TO BE MAINTAINED BY THE CITYL4N 89°49'30" W17.33'L5N 89°49'30" W(55.67')L6N 00°10'30" W8.00' C1 79°49'39" 22.50' 31.35' 18.82'REMOVE AND REPLACE AC PAVEMENT OVER BASE IN KIND PER CITY STD.5TRACT NO. 37298-1LOT #1, PA 17COMMERCIAL SITE15MEADOWLINE WAY CONSTRUCT LOCAL DEPRESSION PER RCFC & WCD STD. DWG. NO. LD201AND DETAILS HEREON. ALSO SEE DETAILS ON STREET IMPROVEMENT PLAN.NOTE:1.RCFC& WCD PLANS FOR HIGHLAND SPRINGS CHANNEL, STAGE 3 USES NGVD 292.TO CONVERT FROM NGVD 29 TO NAVD 88, 2.66 FEET IS ADDEDTO STAGE 3 PLAN ELEVATIONS610600590LINE "P1"L786.34'N 89°49'30" W1214L820.50'N 89°49'30" WINSTALL CONCRETE COLLAR PER RCFC& WCD STD. DWG. NO. M80316CONSTRUCT 18” RCP STORM DRAIN (D-LOAD PER PROFILE) WITH SLURRY CEMENTBACKFILL IN OUTER BEDDING AND HAUNCH AREAS PER CALTRANS STD. DWG. NO. A62DA.CONSTRUCT 36” RCP STORM DRAIN (D-LOAD PER PROFILE) WITH SLURRY CEMENTBACKFILL IN OUTER BEDDING AND HAUNCH AREAS PER CALTRANS STD. DWG. NO. A62DA.13CONSTRUCT 14”X23" ELLIPTICAL PIPE STORM DRAIN (D-LOAD PER PROFILE) WITH SLURRY CEMENTBACKFILL IN OUTER BEDDING AND HAUNCH AREAS PER CALTRANS STD. DWG. NO. A62DA.CONSTRUCT 22”X34" ELLIPTICAL PIPE STORM DRAIN (D-LOAD PER PROFILE) WITH SLURRY CEMENTBACKFILL IN OUTER BEDDING AND HAUNCH AREAS PER CALTRANS STD. DWG. NO. A62DA.CONSTRUCT 19”X30" ELLIPTICAL PIPE STORM DRAIN (D-LOAD PER PROFILE) WITH SLURRY CEMENTBACKFILL IN OUTER BEDDING AND HAUNCH AREAS PER CALTRANS STD. DWG. NO. A62DA.L106.17'N 89°49'30" W6CONSTRUCT 24” RCP STORM DRAIN (D-LOAD PER PROFILE) WITH SLURRY CEMENTBACKFILL IN OUTER BEDDING AND HAUNCH AREAS PER CALTRANS STD. DWG. NO. A62DA.1REV. SD LINE P1, ADD SD LINE P22ADD SD LINE P3, REV. SD LINE P2, REV. SD LINE N3REV. PROFILE SD LINE P1, P2, ADD TRANSITION STRUCTURE3333333CONSTRUCT TRANSITION STRUCTURE NO. 3 PER RCFC& WCD STD. DWG. NO. TS303173333332 6 7
4 2
6 7
3 2675
266726702
6 7
4 2
6 7
3 2675
2667267012" W116'
58'58'
L1 L2R/WEXISTING RCB 13'(W) X 4'(H)(PER PLANS DWG. NO. 5-202)139EXIST. BCVWD 16" WATER=64+95.98 CL RCB 13'(W) X 4'(H)=52+16.26 HIGHLAND SPRINGS AVEOAK VALLEYPARKWAY71'80'151'32'EASEMENT PER DOC. #63162=1+00.00 CL INT. LINE "N"VARIES12 11 12" NON-POTABLE WATER12" W EX. CATVEX. ELEC EX. 8" G COUNTY OF RIVERSIDEDATE: 7/1/7043C11+11.56 PROP. R/WEXIST. R/WTTM 37390(ATWELL)1 1 43 TRACT NO. 31893SUNDANCESINGLE-FAMILYRESIDENTIALCITY OF BEAUMONTTRACT NO. 30332-4SUNDANCESINGLE-FAMILYRESIDENTIALL510'CITY BOUNDARY10+00.00 CL INT. OAK LANE EXIST. BCVWD 16" NON-POTABLE WATERTRACT BOUNDARYCAUTION!!!EX. 30" GAS& TRACT BOUNDARY40'2 6 7
4 2
6 7
3 2675
26672670C C.B. #N253+11.87 ST. STAW=28', V=7.60'
55'±PROPOSED PUBLIC DRAINAGE& MAINTENANCE EASEMENTPER SEPARATE INSTRUMENTCITY OF BEAUMONTCITY OF BANNING=52+27.20 HIGHLAND SPRINGS AVE2+50.99LC C .

B
.
#N
1W=4
'
,

V=
5 .
3 7
'
11+
0 0
.
6 7

S
T
.

S
TA
2+99.53 EC2+68.18 BC1L3
12" W52 53 541011
1230'EXIST. AC BERM10+0011+00WILSON STREET4W=24', V=5.65' @ 24"RCP15+20.00 ST. STA28+00.00 RCB STA3EX. 18" W71'47'L5PROP. R/W8TH STREETLOT "AA"8782'153'W=24', V=6.36'28+00.00 RCB STAC C.B. #P234L78PER STREET IMPROVEMENT PLANPROPOSED CURB & GUTTER 6'38'26'18'11 12" W EX. CATV
EX. ELEC
1211EX. 4" G12'(W) X 7'(H) RCB CULVERTPER CHANNEL PLANS, STAGE 3DWG. NO. 5-02132L4L6W=24', V=5.47'15+52.00 ST. STAC C.B. #P1a4311L124'10EXIST. RCB HIGHLAND SPRINGSCHANEL STAGE II (DWG NO. 5-147)TRACT NO. 37298-1LOT#3, PA 18COMMERCIAL SITECITY OF BANNINGPM NO. 35789SUNDANCECORPORATE CENTERCOMMERCIALCITY OF BEAUMONT5W=22'CITY BOUNDARYEXISTING CURB & GUTTER EX. 8" GAS EX. R/WEX. TELEEX. FIBER OPTICPROPOSED RAISED MEDIAN& TRACT BOUNDARYEXISTING CURB & GUTTER TO BE REMOVEDEXIST. R/WEASEMENT PER DOC. #63162COUNTY OF RIVERSIDEDATE: 7/1/70129CITY OF BANNING CITY OF BEAUMONT =15+20.00 ST. STASEE DETAIL ON SHEET 2CL INTERSECTION13+67.92 CL HIGHLAND SPRINGS AVE.= 9+99.82 CONST. CL WILSON ST.CL INTERSECTION13+59.92 CL HIGHLAND SPRINGS AVE.= 10+00.00 LEGAL CL WILSON ST.C C.B. #P1LL7SD LINE 'P1'SD LINE 'P2'1515L8L101+97.50 CONC. COLLARJOIN EX. PIPE166V=5.61' @ELLIPTICAL PIPESD LINE 'P3'SEE SHEET NO. 3AX317EX. CURB & GUTTER TO BE REMOVEDR/W33ENCASEMENT 101+41.73 END T.S JOIN EX. PIPEEND REMOVAL EX. 24 RCP313 14 15 16 91011605.98 TC
C.B #P1
605.83 TC
C.B #P2
CONST. 86.34 L.F.19"X30" ELLIPTICAL RCP S=0.0035STA 2+03.67 600.37 INV

END PIPE
STA 1+17.33 599.48 INV

BEGIN PIPE
Q =9.8 CFSV =3.1 FPS100MAXEX. SCE ENCASEMENT*
(599.46 TOP SCE)
599.54 BOT SD
EX. (2) 2" CATV
(602.84 BOP) CATV*
602.16 TOP SD
1+45.79
600.17 INV/GB CLEX. (2) 8" GAS(601.78 BOP) YELLOW GAS LINE*601.56 TOP SD(602.00 BOP) BLACK GAS LINE601.59 TOP SDCAUTION!!!RIVERSIDE COUNTY EASEMENT82'R/WEXIST.CL26'LPROPOSED FINISHED SURFACEOVER STORM DRAIN CINSTALL SAND CUSHIONINSTALL SAND CUSHIONSTA 1+14.16 600.38 INV END PIPE 12'(W) X 7'(H) RCB CULVERTPER CHANNEL PLANS, STAGE 3DWG. NO. 5-0213INSTALL SAND CUSHIONHGLCITY OF BEAUMONTCITY OF BANNINGHIGHLAND SPRINGS AVENUEREMOVE EXISTING SCE CONCRETEBACKFILL ABOVE SCE ENCASEMENTUNDER SCE SUPERVISION36" SD SEELINE P-1 PROFILE12" WATER X-ING2600.05 BOP SD2598.12 TOP CASING2597.31 TOP 12" WATSTA 1+96.00 S=0.0242(D-2000)WATER TIGHT JOINTS(664.41 INV )(PER PLAN DWG. NO. 5-202)EXISTING 13'(W) X 4'(H) RCB 673.14 TC C.B #N2671.56 TC C.B #N1
STA 3+18.97
STA 1+11.56665.56 INV END PIPECONSTRUCT 139.43 L.F.14"X23" ELLIPTICAL (D-1500)@ S=0.0020STA 2+54.16 665.86 INVCONSTRUCT 64.81 L.F.18" RCP (D-1500)@ S=0.0050Q =9.8 CFSV =6.4 FPS100MAX=64+95.98 CL EXIST. RCB 1+00.00 CL INT.CL=52+16.26 HIGHLAND SPRINGS AVEPROPOSED FINISHED SURFACEOVER STORM DRAIN CLHGL667.94 BOP 12" W666.94 TOP SD EX. CATVEX. 8" GAS665.28 INV ELEV. RSTA 2+50.99 2+68.18 BC665.93 INV2+99.53 EC666.09 INVQ =1.3 CFSV =0.7 FPS100MAX666.65 WSE666.19 INV ***STA 1+08.63(665.27 ELEV. S)*(667.40 BOP)*BEGIN PIPEBEGIN PIPE END PIPE (668.60 BOP)666.74 TOP SD666.73 TOP SD(667.40 BOT)EX. ELEC. ENCASEMENT666.58 TOP SDINSTALLEX. 16" W(662.21 TOP)SAND CUSHIONINSTALL SAND CUSHIONPOTABLE WATER(661.78 TOP)EX. 16" NONCITY OF BEAUMONTCITY OF BANNINGHIGHLAND SPRINGSAVENUEFIELD SHOT (NAVD 88)(NAVD 88)**605.89 TC C.B #P2
605.74 TC
STA 1+97.50 (600.22 INV)CL(S=0.0035)STA 1+08.00
C.B #P1
LRIVERSIDE COUNTY EASEMENT82'R/WEXIST.PROPOSED FINISHED SURFACEOVER STORM DRAIN C12'(W) X
7 '(H)
RCBCL26'(597.59

FL)
NAVD
88604.98 WSESTA 1+14.16 599.38 INV
STA 1+17.33 599.48 INV
HGL12'(W) X 7'(H) RCB CULVERTPER CHANNEL PLANS, STAGE 3DWG. NO. 5-0213EX. (2) 2" CATV*STA 1+06.00599.34 INV ELEV. S599.35 INV ELEV. R

BEGIN PIPE

END PIPE

BEGIN PIPE
CONC. COLLAR (603.01 TP)=STA 15+20
.00
H

IGHLAND
SPR
ING
AVE
.STA 28+00
.00

RCB(NAVD 88)**Q =36.2 CFSV =5.1 FPS100MAXEND PIPE
2+03.67 600.24 INV***CONST. 6.17 L.FEX. (2) 8" GAS(601.84 BOP) YELLOW GAS LINE*(601.55 TOP SD)(601.98 BOP) BLACK GAS LINE(601.59 TOP SD)CAUTION!!!CITY OF BEAUMONTCITY OF BANNINGHIGHLAND SPRINGSAVENUEREMOVE EXIST. JUNCTIONSTRUCTURE FOR 24" RCP12" WATER
X
-
ING
(

2599
.96
BOP
EX
.
24 "
SD
)2598.11
TOP
CAS
INGEXIST. 55.67 L.F.24" RCPCONST. 6.16 L.F.36" RCP (D-2000)@ S=0.0045CONST. 20.50 L.F.19"X30" ELLIPTICAL(D-2000)24" RCP (D-2000)JOIN EX. PIPE @ S=0.0035**2597.30
TOP
12 "
WATSTA 1+96
.00Q =8.3 CFSV =2.6 FPS100MAXQ =8.3 CFSV =2.6 FPS100MAXQ =8.3 CFSV =2.6 FPS100MAX1+41.83 END T.S 600.02 INV
EX. SCE ENCASEMENT*
(599.46 TOP SCE)
599.54 BOT SD
S=0.0240
1+37.83 BEGIN T.S
599.97 INV INSTALLSAND CUSHIONINSTALLSAND CUSHIONWATER TIGHT JOINTSWATER TIGHT JOINTSWATER TIGHT JOINTS9/16/20FOR DELTA 3 ONLY09/16/2009/16/203292BPage 295 of 877

TRACT NO. 37298-1, OFF-SITE STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENT PLAN MDS File: 89404-SD SHT-03A.dwgPlot Scale: 0.386863 Dwg Scale: ----Plot Date: 09.09.2020 3:31:35 PM By: Station166 MDS Proj. Data: I:\89404\ENGINEERING\Plans\Storm Drain\Offsite (Highland Springs)Created: 09.09.2020 03:02:47 PM Author:----Last Edit: 09.09.2020 03:12:41 PM By: Station166REVISIONSMARKAPPRDATECall before you D gW.O. No.CIP No.PROJECT No.SHEET OF 5OFF-SITE STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENT PLANTRACT NO. 37298-1M O R S ES C H U L T ZVoice: 949-251-8821P L A N N E R SE N G I N E E R S S U R V E Y O R S17320 Redhill AvenueSuite 350Irvine, CA 92614PLANS PREPARED BY:SUBMITTED BY:EDWARD J. LENTHRCE# 052496 EXP. 12-31-20DATEPROFILE SCALES1"=40'VERT. 1"=4'PLAN SCALEHORIZ. 1"=40'APPROVED BY:ARTURO VELA, RCE #75696PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR/CITY ENGINEERDATECITY OF BANNINGEXP. 6/30/20RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL BY:KEVIN D. SIN, RCE #71299SENIOR CIVIL ENGINEERDATEEXP. 12/31/219-9-20203ACONSTRUCTION NOTES:112LINE "P3"LINE "P3"610600590CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY EXISTING UTILITYLOCATION AND ELEVATION PRIOR TO BEGINING OF CONSTRUCTION.*HIGHLAND SPRINGS AVENUESTAFF ENGINEERPUBLIC WORKS DEPART., ENGINEERING DIVISIONDATEREVIEWED BY:CITY ENGINEERDATERECOMMENDED FORAPPROVAL BY:DATEAPPROVED BY:CITY OF BEAUMONT REMOVE AND REPLACE AC PAVEMENT OVER BASE IN KIND PER CITY STD.5NOTE:1.RCFC& WCD PLANS FOR HIGHLAND SPRINGS CHANNEL, STAGE 3 USES NGVD 292.TO CONVERT FROM NGVD 29 TO NAVD 88, 2.66 FEET IS ADDEDTO STAGE 3 PLAN ELEVATIONS610600590LINE "P3"CONSTRUCT 18” RCP STORM DRAIN (D-LOAD PER PROFILE) WITH SLURRY CEMENTBACKFILL IN OUTER BEDDING AND HAUNCH AREAS PER CALTRANS STD. DWG. NO. A62DA.2ADD SD LINE P3LINEBEARINGDISTANCEL1N 89°49'30" W86.34'LINE TABLE3REV. PROFILE SD LINE P3333310+0011+00WILSON STREET15+20.00 ST. STA28+00.00 RCB STAEX. 18" W71'47'PROP. R/W8TH STREETLOT "AA"82'153'W=24', V=6.36'28+00.00 RCB STAC C.B. #P2LPER STREET IMPROVEMENT PLANPROPOSED CURB & GUTTER 6'38'26'18' 12" W EX. CATV
EX. ELEC
EX. 4" G12'(W) X 7'(H) RCB CULVERTPER CHANNEL PLANS, STAGE 3DWG. NO. 5-021315+52.00 ST. STAC C.B. #P1aL24'EXIST. RCB HIGHLAND SPRINGSCHANEL STAGE II (DWG NO. 5-147)TRACT NO. 37298-1LOT#3, PA 18COMMERCIAL SITECITY OF BANNINGPM NO. 35789SUNDANCECORPORATE CENTERCOMMERCIALCITY OF BEAUMONT5W=22'CITY BOUNDARYEXISTING CURB & GUTTER EX. 8" GAS EX. R/WEX. TELEEX. FIBER OPTICPROPOSED RAISED MEDIAN& TRACT BOUNDARYEXISTING CURB & GUTTER TO BE REMOVEDEXIST. R/WEASEMENT PER DOC. #63162COUNTY OF RIVERSIDEDATE: 7/1/70CITY OF BANNING CITY OF BEAUMONT =15+20.00 ST. STACL INTERSECTION13+67.92 CL HIGHLAND SPRINGS AVE.= 9+99.82 CONST. CL WILSON ST.CL INTERSECTION13+59.92 CL HIGHLAND SPRINGS AVE.= 10+00.00 LEGAL CL WILSON ST.C C.B. #P1LSD LINE 'P3'SD LINE 'P2'1SD LINE 'P1'SEE SHEET NO. 3SEE SHEET NO. 3L1V=5.61' @ 18" RCPR/WEX. CURB & GUTTER TO BE REMOVED13 14 15 16 91011605.98 TC
C.B #P1
605.83 TC
C.B #P2
CONST. 86.34 L.F.18" RCP (D-2000) S=0.0035STA 2+03.67 600.37 INV

END PIPE
STA 1+17.33 599.48 INV

BEGIN PIPE
Q =6.3 CFSV =3.6 FPS100MAXEX. SCE ENCASEMENT
*(599.46 TOP SCE)
599.54 BOT SD
EX. (2) 2" CATV
(602.84 BOP) CATV*
602.02 TOP SD
1+56.44
600.20 INV/GB CLEX. (2) 8" GAS*CAUTION!!!RIVERSIDE COUNTY EASEMENT82'R/WEXIST.CL26'LPROPOSED FINISHED SURFACEOVER STORM DRAIN CINSTALL SAND CUSHION12'(W) X 7'(H) RCB CULVERTPER CHANNEL PLANS, STAGE 3DWG. NO. 5-0213INSTALL SAND CUSHIONHGLCITY OF BEAUMONTCITY OF BANNINGHIGHLAND SPRINGS AVENUEREMOVE EXISTING SCE CONCRETEBACKFILL ABOVE SCE ENCASEMENTUNDER SCE SUPERVISION36" SD SEELINE P-1 PROFILE12" WATER X-ING2600.13 BOP SD2598.10 TOP CASING2597.30 TOP 12" WATSTA 1+96.00(601.92 BOP) YELLOW GAS LINE601.34 TOP SD(602.20 BOP) BLACK GAS LINE601.38 TOP SDSTA 1+14.16 600.38 INVEND PIPE S=0.0184WATER TIGHT JOINTS9/16/20FOR DELTA 3 ONLY09/16/2009/16/203292BPage 296 of 877

4TRACT NO. 37298-1, OFF-SITE STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENT PLAN MDS File: 89404-SD SHT-03A.dwgPlot Scale: 0.386863 Dwg Scale: ----Plot Date: 07.17.2019 1:36:51 PM By: Station166 MDS Proj. Data: I:\89404\ENGINEERING\Plans\Storm Drain\Offsite (Highland Springs)Created: 08.28.2020 10:47:54 AM Author:----Last Edit: 08.31.2020 04:16:16 PM By: Station166REVISIONSMARKAPPRDATECall before you D gW.O. No.CIP No.PROJECT No.SHEET OF 5OFF-SITE STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENT PLANTRACT NO. 37298-1M O R S ES C H U L T ZVoice: 949-251-8821P L A N N E R SE N G I N E E R S S U R V E Y O R S17320 Redhill AvenueSuite 350Irvine, CA 92614PLANS PREPARED BY:SUBMITTED BY:EDWARD J. LENTHRCE# 052496 EXP. 12-31-20DATEAPPROVED BY:ARTURO VELA, RCE #75696PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR/CITY ENGINEERDATECITY OF BANNINGEXP. 6/30/20RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL BY:KEVIN D. SIN, RCE #71299SENIOR CIVIL ENGINEERDATEEXP. 12/31/219-1-2020USW-1 CONNECTOR PIPE SCREEN DETAILSUSW-1 CONNECTOR PIPE SCREENMAINTAINED BY CITY STAFF ENGINEERPUBLIC WORKS DEPART., ENGINEERING DIVISIONDATEREVIEWED BY:CITY ENGINEERDATERECOMMENDED FORAPPROVAL BY:DATEAPPROVED BY:CITY OF BEAUMONT SS-304 Wedge Anchor3/8" x 3" (Typ)CPS unit Front Screen304 SS 14 Gauge 5mmOpening Screen1"x1 1/2" Angle 14 GaugeCenter Support BracketSS 304 Perforated Screen5 mm Opening 14 GaugeN.T.S1x 1 1/2" Angle 14 GaugeDeflector Support Bracket(Typ)12" C-C(Typ)DETAIL 1DETAIL 2DETAIL 3DETAIL 4DETAIL 5See Detail "J"12(ALSO SEE LOCAL DEPRESSION DETAILS SHEET 2)B=11"ASSEMBLED REMOVABLE FRONT SCREEN CPSCONNECTOR PIPE SCREEN FRAME & DEFLECTOR (CPS)DEFLECTOR PLAN VIEWREMOVABLE FRONT CPS SCREEN PANEL WITH SUPPORT BRACINGCPS Sizing Table 1on Sheet 5Connector PipeAAAL=AL=A+2BL=A+2BConnector PipeConnector PipeDeflectorSee Detail 3Deflector, SeeDetail 3CPS Sizing Table 1on Sheet 5Detail JN.T.SC.BM.HTop ofSide WalkHs5mm OpeningScreen 14 gaugeSection x-xN.T.SSee Detail "J"Side Walk2"x2" PerforatedAngle 304 SS 14 Gauge (Typ)3/8x3" SS 304Concrete WedgeAnchor (Typ)3/8x3" SS 304Concrete WedgeAnchor (Typ)SS 304Perforated Angle 2"x2" 14 Gauge (Typ)#12x1/2" Self Tapping304 SS Tech Screws(Secures 2"x2" Angle ToSupport Leg & Side Panel)#12x1/2" Self Tapping304 SS Tech Screws(Secures 2"x2" Angle ToSupport Leg & Side Panel)SS 304Wedge Anchor3/8"x3" (2 each) (Typ)1" x1-1/2 DeflectorSupport FrameSS 304, 5mm OpeningPerforated "Z" Screen14 Gauge one PieceSS 304 Self Drilling Screw 3/16 Total 4 bottomBracket and 2 TopRemovable Front ScreenPlanN.T.SGutter2"x2" GuideAngleSupport Frame Angle2"x2" PeforatedAngle 304 SS 14 Gauge (Typ)1 1/2 x1 1/214 Gauge 5 mmPerforated SupportFrame Angle (Typ)3/8 x3" SS 304Concrete Wedge Anchor (Typ)3/8 x3" SS 304Concrete Anchor (Typ)HsSee Detail 3Deflector See Detai 31-Piece "Z"3/8 x3" SS 304Concrete Wedge Anchor (Typ)Side Panels10" Wide 14 GaugePerforated SeeDetail "J" Side PanelsLower CenterSupport BracketSide Panels 10" Wide14 Gauge PerforatedFront Removable ScreenPanel Can Be RemovedVertically By LiftingSee Front Screen Panel Detail 3Side Panels 10" Wide 14 Gauge Perforated*HbScreenFront RemovableBottom Trimmed ToConform to Irregular Catch BasinFloor Surface#12x1/2" Self Tapping304 SS Tech Screws(Secures 2"x2" Angle ToSupport Leg & Side Panel)DeflectorSide Panels 10" Wide 14 Gauge Perforated**Both legs of Deflector Support Frame mustextend to the top of the Deflector and Alsoextend at least to the bottom of the Mounting Frame**Side PanelHb BelowDeflector ScreenCurb faceDETAILS PER UNITED STORM WATER, INC. SEE TABLE 1 ON SHEET 51-1/4"1-1/4"A-1/2"Angled Member Length to Be Determinedin Field as Based on As-Built Catch basinConditions Under Review of Inspector1/4" (Typ)1/8" (Typ)2" (Typ)3"(typ)1- 1/2"AAHs/212" 3"(Typ)1 1/2"1 1/2"1 1/2"1 1/2"1 1/2"1 1/2"Hs(Typ)9/16/20FOR DELTA 3 ONLY09/16/203292BPage 297 of 877

5TRACT NO. 37298-1, OFF-SITE STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENT PLAN MDS File: 89404-SD SHT-03A.dwgPlot Scale: 0.386863 Dwg Scale: ----Plot Date: 07.17.2019 1:36:51 PM By: Station166 MDS Proj. Data: I:\89404\ENGINEERING\Plans\Storm Drain\Offsite (Highland Springs)Created: 08.28.2020 10:47:54 AM Author:----Last Edit: 08.31.2020 04:16:16 PM By: Station166REVISIONSMARKAPPRDATECall before you D gW.O. No.CIP No.PROJECT No.SHEET OF 5OFF-SITE STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENT PLANTRACT NO. 37298-1M O R S ES C H U L T ZVoice: 949-251-8821P L A N N E R SE N G I N E E R S S U R V E Y O R S17320 Redhill AvenueSuite 350Irvine, CA 92614PLANS PREPARED BY:SUBMITTED BY:EDWARD J. LENTHRCE# 052496 EXP. 12-31-20DATEAPPROVED BY:ARTURO VELA, RCE #75696PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR/CITY ENGINEERDATECITY OF BANNINGEXP. 6/30/20RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL BY:KEVIN D. SIN, RCE #71299SENIOR CIVIL ENGINEERDATEEXP. 12/31/219-1-2020APPENDIX A-1 ANDSTAFF ENGINEERPUBLIC WORKS DEPART., ENGINEERING DIVISIONDATEREVIEWED BY:CITY ENGINEERDATERECOMMENDED FORAPPROVAL BY:DATEAPPROVED BY:CITY OF BEAUMONT CPS SIZING TABLE 1 USW-1 CONNECTOR PIPE SCREENMAINTAINED BY CITY12(ALSO SEE LOCAL DEPRESSION DETAILS SHEET 2)TABLE 1Installation to be verified in field by Contractor"V" AT DOWNSTREAM SIDE OF C.B.**2FOR DELTA 3 ONLY9/16/2009/16/203292BPage 298 of 877

Staff Report

TO: City Council
FROM: Jeff Hart, Public Works Director
DATE December 20, 2022
SUBJECT: Final Approval of Tract Map No 31462-23

Description Approve Tract Map No. 31462-23 and Accept Security Agreement for Survey Monuments.

Background and Analysis:

As part of the development process to subdivide a parcel(s) in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act, a tentative map is reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission and City Council. During the review process, staff reviews conditions of approval provided by all City departments and prepares final conditions to be issued along with the tentative map approval. Once a tentative map is approved by City Council and conditions have been satisfied, final approval by City Council is required to complete the subdivision process.

On October 7, 2003, City Council approved Tentative Map No. 31462, subject to the completion of the conditions of approval. Tentative Tract No. 31462 proposes to subdivide 960.91 acres into 3,300 single family residences, apartments, and townhomes, with a series of parks, open space, school sites and commercial and recreation areas. Tentative Map No. 31462 comprises a majority of the adopted Oak Valley & SCPGA Golf Course Specific Plan. Refer to Figure 1 for Tentative Map No. 31462 layout.

The proposed Tract Map No. 31462-23 (Tract) is a phased portion of Tentative Tract Map No. 31462 and is within Planning Area (PA) 22B of the Oak Valley & SCPGA Golf Course Specific Plan. The Tract consist of 14.62 gross acres and will create 55 residential lots. Refer to Figure 2 for Vicinity Map.

Figure 1- Tentative Map No. 31462

Figure 2 - Tract Map No. 31462-23 Vicinity Map

Per Beaumont Municipal Code 16.36.080, The City Engineer has certified that:
(A) He has examined the map.
(B) The land division as shown is substantially the same as it appeared on the tentative map and any approved alterations thereof.
(C) All provisions of the Subdivision Map Act and all City ordinances applicable at the time of approval of the tentative map have been complied with. (D) He is satisfied that the map is technically correct. (E) In the City Engineers/Surveyors certificate, the date of approval of the tentative map and the date of expiration is stated.

Subsequently, staff recommends the Final Map be approved pursuant to Section

16.36.090 of the Beaumont Municipal Code. However, if City Council determines that the division of land does not conform to all the requirements of the Subdivision Map Act, Development Agreement, and Beaumont Municipal Code applicable of the tentative map and any rulings made thereunder, may disapprove the map; provided, however, the final map shall not be disapproved due to technical or inadvertent errors which can easily be corrected, and in the opinion of the City Engineer, do not materially affect the validity of the map.

There are several public improvements required as part of the development of the Tract including storm drain, street, and sewer improvements. As of the date of this report, no improvements have been accepted. Therefore, in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act and Beaumont Municipal Code 16.56.010, the land divided shall enter into an agreement with the City to complete the improvements, and in connection therewith shall furnish the City improvement security in the amounts required by Section

16.56.040 of said Beaumont Municipal Code.

In addition to the public improvements, there are several survey monuments required to be set as part of this Tract. The Subdivision Map Act requires that at least one exterior boundary line of the land being subdivided be adequately monumented or referenced before the map is recorded. The land divider has certified that all exterior boundary lines are monumented. Furthermore, the Subdivision Map Act and Beaumont Municipal Code

16.36.100 states that interior monuments need not be set at the time the map is recorded if the engineer or surveyor certifies on the map that the monuments will be set on, or before, a specified later date, and if the land divider furnishes security guaranteeing the payment of the cost of setting such monuments.

The land divider has provided a subdivision improvement agreement and security in the form of a cash deposit for the interior survey monuments. The agreement has been reviewed by staff and found to be consistent with the Beaumont Municipal Code.

The land divider has previously provided security agreements and security in the form of bonds for all other public improvements. The following table is a summary of the improvements and corresponding bonds:

Table 1 - Tract Map No. 31462-23 Bond Summary
Bond
Number
Improvement PW
Project
Number
Plan Number Date of Acceptance
30148217 Sewer PW2021-
0703
3402A April 19, 2022
30148221 Storm Drain PW2021-
0704
3398A April 19, 2022
30148212 Street PW2021-
0702
3407 April 5, 2022

Fiscal Impact:

The cost to prepare this staff report is estimated to be $350. All public improvements associated with Tract will be completed at developer’s expense. The City is not liable for public improvement maintenance until the public improvements are accepted into the publicly maintained system.

Recommended Action:

Approve Tract Map No. 31462-23 as it is in substantial conformance with the approved tentative map, and
Accept Security Agreement for survey monuments.

Attachments:

A. Tract Map No. 31462-23 Final Map Package

I
1 0

November 16, 2022

Tract Map 31462-23 – Meritage Homes of California, Inc.

Monumentation - Cash Surety Deposit

The City of Beaumont received a Cash Surety for the above Tract Map Monumentation. The payment was made on the 30th of September by authority of Nick Harris, Forward Planning Analyst for Meritage Homes. Payment was collected on behalf of the City of Beaumont by Francisca Ochoa, Customer Service Coordinator. Cash Surety receipt confirmation number is R01270138. The Cash Surety amount is as follows:

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Thank you,

Richard Godsey
Public Works

Submittal Name Amount
TR 31462-23 – Cash Surety

$9,000.00

Staff Report

TO: City Council
FROM: Jeff Hart, Public Works Director
DATE December 20, 2022
SUBJECT: Final Approval of Tract Map No 31462-25

Description Approve Tract Map No. 31462-25 and Accept Security Agreement for Survey Monuments.

Background and Analysis:

As part of the development process to subdivide a parcel(s) in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act, a tentative map is reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission and City Council. During the review process, staff reviews conditions of approval provided by all City departments and prepares final conditions to be issued along with the tentative map approval. Once a tentative map is approved by City Council and conditions have been satisfied, final approval by City Council is required to complete the subdivision process.

On October 7, 2003, City Council approved Tentative Map No. 31462, subject to the completion of the conditions of approval. Tentative Tract No. 31462 proposes to subdivide 960.91 acres into 3,300 single family residences, apartments, and townhomes, with a series of parks, open space, school sites and commercial and recreation areas. Tentative Map No. 31462 comprises a majority of the adopted Oak Valley & SCPGA Golf Course Specific Plan. Refer to Figure 1 for Tentative Map No. 31462 layout.

Proposed Tract Map No. 31462-25 (Tract) is a phased portion of Tentative Tract Map No. 31462, and is within Planning Area (PA) 22D of the Oak Valley & SCPGA Golf Course Specific Plan. The Tract consist of 10.99 gross acres and will create 54 residential lots. Refer to Figure 2 for Vicinity Map.

Figure 1- Tentative Map No. 31462

Figure 2 - Tract Map No. 31462-25 Vicinity Map

Per Beaumont Municipal Code 16.36.080, The City Engineer has certif ied that:
(A) He has examined the map.
(B) The land division as shown is substantially the same as it appeared on the tentative map and any approved alterations thereof.
(C) All provisions of the Subdivision Map Act and all City ordinances applicable at the time of approval of the tentative map have been complied with. (D) He is satisfied that the map is technically correct. (E) In the City Engineers/Surveyors certificate, the date of approval of the tentative map and the date of expiration is stated.

Subsequently, staff recommends the Final Map be approved pursuant to Section

16.36.090 of the Beaumont Municipal Code. However, if City Council determines that the division of land does not conform to all the requirements of the Subdivision Map Act, Development Agreement, and Beaumont Municipal Code applicable of the tentative map and any rulings made thereunder, may disapprove the map; provided, however, the final map shall not be disapproved due to technical or inadvertent errors which can easily be corrected, and in the opinion of the City Engineer, do not materially affect the validity of the map.

There are several public improvements required as part of the development of the Tract including storm drain, street, and sewer improvements. As of the date of this report, n o improvements have been accepted. Therefore, in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act and Beaumont Municipal Code 16.56.010, the land divided shall enter into an agreement with the City to complete the improvements, and in connection therewith shall furnish the City improvement security in the amounts required by Section

16.56.040 of said Beaumont Municipal Code.

In addition to the public improvements, there are several survey monuments required to be set as part of this Tract. The Subdivision Map Act requires that at least one exterior boundary line of the land being subdivided be adequately monumented or referenced before the map is recorded. The land divider has certified that all exterior boundary lines are monumented. Furthermore, the Subdivision Map Act and Beaumont Municipal Code

16.36.100 state that interior monuments need not be set at the time the map is recorded if the engineer or surveyor certifies on the map that the monuments will be set on , or before, a specified later date, and if the land divider furnishes security guaranteeing the payment of the cost of setting such monuments.

The land divider has provided a subdivision improvement agreement and security in the form of a cash deposit for the interior survey monuments. The agreement has been reviewed by staff and found to be consistent with the Beaumont Municipal Code.

The land divider has previously provided security agreements and security in the form of bonds for all other public improvements. The following table is a summary of the improvements and corresponding bonds:

Table 1 - Tract Map No. 31462-25 Bond Summary
Bond
Number
Improvement PW Project
Number
Plan
Number
Date of Acceptance
30148219 Sewer PW2021-
0709
3404 April 5, 2022
30148223 Storm Drain PW2021-
0710
3340 April 5, 2022
30148215 Street PW2021-
0708
3409 April 5, 2022

Fiscal Impact:

The cost to prepare this staff report is estimated to be $350. All public improvements associated with the tract will be completed at developer’s expense. The City is not liable for public improvement maintenance until the public improvements are accepted into the City’s publicly maintained system.

Recommended Action:

Approve Tract Map No. 31462-25 as it is in substantial conformance with the approved tentative map, and
Accept Security Agreement for survey monuments.

Attachments:

A. Tract Map No. 31462-25 Final Map Package

I
1 0

November 16, 2022

Tract Map 31462-25 – Meritage Homes of California, Inc.

Monumentation - Cash Surety Deposit

The City of Beaumont received a Cash Surety for the above Tract Map Monumentation. The payment was made on the 30th of September by authority of Nick Harris, Forward Planning Analyst for Meritage Homes. Payment was collected on behalf of the City of Beaumont by Francisca Ochoa, Customer Service Coordinator. Cash Surety receipt confirmation number is R01270139. The Cash Surety amount is as follows:

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Thank you,

Richard Godsey
Public Works

Submittal Name Amount
TR 31462-25 – Cash Surety

$8,000.00

Staff Report

TO: City Council
FROM: Doug Story, Community Services Director
DATE December 20, 2022
SUBJECT: First Amendment of Contract to West Coast Arborists, Inc. for Tree Trimming and Tree Maintenance Services

Description Extend the contract with West Coast Arborists, Inc. for tree services.

Background and Analysis:

On January 21, 2020, City Council approved a contract for tree trimming and tree maintenance services with West Coast Arborist, Inc. (WCA). The scope of work included annual tree trimming, tree maintenance, and general arborist inspection and reporting services.

The following line items were included in the cost proposals:

 Routine Annual Tree Trimming
 Palm Tree Trimming
 Tree Pruning
 Crown Raising/Clearance Pruning
 Tree Removal and Stump Grinding
 Root Pruning
 Root Barrier Installation
 Tree Planting
 Tree Watering
 General Labor Rates
 Day Rate Service Crew
 Specialty Equipment Day Rate
 Emergency Services
 General Arborist Services
 Plant Health Care Services

Since the implementation of this contract City Council has approved an operating budget (100-6050-7157-0000) for tree maintenance services and tree trimming services

in the amount of $300,000 annually. This amount allows for each city owned tree to be trimmed every two years.

As part of this contract WCA conducted an inventory of all City owned trees in the community. This inventory allows the ability to track the health and maintenance of each tree. In addition to the inspection and observation of each tree, it allowed an arborist to assign a dollar value to each tree in the City’s inventory. At this time, over 9,000 trees that are maintained are estimated at a value of over $20,000,000 in tree assets.

A three-year contract was awarded to WCA in January of 2020. Two contract term extensions of one year each, may be awarded by City Council Per Municipal Code Section 3.02.070. City staff is requesting the approval of a one-year contract extension for services through January 2024.

Fiscal Impact:

This cost is included as a line item in the approved FY 2022/23 Annual Budget. The annual budget for tree trimming and tree maintenance services is currently $300,000. In 2022, WCA increased their rates due to CPI and increased labor costs, these new rates are included as Attachment C.

Recommended Action:

Approve the First Amendment for the Agreement for Maintenance Servic es with West Coast Arborist, Inc. for the tree trimming and tree maintenance services for the City of Beaumont.

Attachments:

A. First Amendment for Maintenance Services
B. WCA Schedule of Compensation for 2022-2023
C. Original Agreement for Maintenance Services

1 FIRST AMENDMENT
TO

AGREEMENT FOR MAINTENANCE SERVICES

THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO MAINTENANCE SERVICES AGREEMENT (“Amendment”) is made and effective as of the 20th day of December 2022 by and between the CITY OF BEAUMONT (“CITY”), a general law city, and West Coast Arborist, Inc., (“CONTRACTOR”) in consideration of the mutual promises and purpose contained herein, the parties agree as follow:

RECITALS

This Amendment is made with respect to the following facts and purpose that the parties agree are true and correct:

A. On January 22, 2020, the City and Contractor, entered into that certain agreement entitled Agreement for Maintenance Services (“Agreement”) for tree maintenance and trimming services for city owned trees which remains in effect.

B. City and Contractor wish to extend the term of the Agreement.

AMENDMENT

1. The Agreement is hereby amended as follows:

Section 1. Term of Agreement: The Agreement shall be extended through January 21, 2024.

Section 3. Compensation: 3.01 Contractor shall be paid at the rates set forth in the Proposal dated May 3, 2022 (“Proposal”), copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and incorporated herein by this reference. Contractor shall not increase any rate without prior written consent of the CITY.

The recitals to this Amendment are deemed incorporated herein by this reference. All other terms of the Agreement not expressly amended by this Amendment shall remain in full force and effect.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereby have made and executed this Amendment to be effective as of the day and year first above-written.

[signatures on following page]

2 CITY:

CITY OF BEAUMONT

By: ________________________________
Julio Martinez III, Mayor

CONTRACTOR:

West Coast Arborist, Inc.

By: ______________________________

Print Name: _______________________

Title: _____________________________

3 EXHIBIT “A”

PROPOSAL

Staff Report

TO: Finance and Audit Committee Members
FROM: Jennifer Ustation, Finance Director
DATE December 20, 2022
SUBJECT: Annual Compliance Report for AB 1600 Development Impact Fees

Description Receive and file the Annual Compliance Report for AB 1600 Development Impact Fees.

Background and Analysis:

State of California Assembly Bill 1600 (AB 1600) – the Mitigation Fee Act (Gov. Code, Sections 66000 et seq.) sets forth the standards governing fees charged to address the impacts of development.

The City Council adopted and updated various other develo pment impact fees applicable to new development within the City. The purpose of development impact fees is to finance the design, construction and acquisition of facilities and equipment necessary to accommodate future development.

Development impact fees that are collected are then segregated and placed in special funds or accounts, which earn interest. Those funds are held for the facilities in which the fees are collected, in accordance with Government Code Section 66006. This report provides a summary of development fee activity and financial detail regarding each of the projects impacted during FY 2022 (July 1, 2021, through June 30, 2022).

The summary of development fee activity and detail regarding each project is included as Attachment A to this report.

Annual Compliance Reporting for all Development Impact Fees

Government Code Subsection 66006 (b) (1) sets forth the annual compliance reporting requirements as:

For each separate account or fund established pursuant to subdivision (a), the lo cal agency shall, within 180 days after the last day of each fiscal year, make available to the public the following information for the fiscal year:

A brief description of the type of fee in the account or fund;

The amount of the fee;

The beginning and ending balance of the account or fund;

The amount of the fees collected and the interest earned;

An identification of each public improvement on which fees were expended and the amount of the expenditures on each improvement, including the total percentage of the cost of the public improvement that was funded with fees;

An identification of an approximate date by which the construction of the public improvement will commence if the local agency determines that sufficient funds have been collected to complete financing on an incomplete public improvement, as identified in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 66001, and the public improvement remains incomplete;

A description of each inter-fund transfer or loan made from the account or fund, including the public improvement on which the transferred or loaned fees will be expended, and in the case of an inter-fund loan, the date on which the loan will be repaid and the rate of interest that the account or fund will receive on the loan; an d

The amount of refunds made pursuant to subdivision (e) Section 66001 and any allocation pursuant to subdivision (f) of Section 66001 .

Recommended Action:

Receive and file the AB 1600 report on development impact fee activity that occurred during the period of July 1, 2021, through June 30, 2022.

Attachments:

A. Exhibit A
B. Exhibit B
C. Exhibit C
D. AB1600 Report

**Revised
Summary of AB1600 Development Impact Fee Reports
Report # Description
Balance
6/30/2021 *Fees Interest Expenditures Transfers In Refund Balance
6/30/2022 FUND
1 Traffic Signal 1,620,542.13     179,997.81        4,544.24          (182,953.78)              1,622,130.40     556 2 Railroad Crossing 2,311,038.86     242,393.23        6,636.63          (28,323.25)                 2,605,466.09     558 3 Fire Facility 4,597,214.37     472,975.23        13,116.35        5,083,305.95     560 4 BSFF Facility 1,035,995.94     439,312.70        3,635.53          (131,596.03)              1,347,348.14     552 5 Emergency Prepardeness (928,736.64)       831,470.64         ‐                     ‐                               (97,266.00)         566 6 General Plan 15,057.00          87,226.25          175.67             102,458.92        554 7 Recycled Water 2,837,178.63     1,382,580.62     10,652.18        4,230,411.43     564 8 Noble Creek Sewer 54,772.72          31,742.25          206.54              ‐                               86,721.51          705‐6010 9 Trunk Maint Facility 268,062.02        11,134.43          1,010.83           ‐                               280,207.28        705‐6030 10 Upper Potrero Sewer 92,482.85           ‐                      348.74              ‐                               92,831.59          705‐6015 11 Lower Potrero Sewer 542,653.75        45,032.42          2,046.28           ‐                               589,732.45        705‐6020 12 San Timoteo Sewer 103,228.42         ‐                      389.26              ‐                               103,617.68        705‐6025 & 6024? 13 Beaumont Mesa Sewer 171,157.71        82,015.24          645.42              ‐                               253,818.37        705‐6026 14 Eastside Facility 104,879.58         ‐                      395.49              ‐                               105,275.07        705‐6040 15 Westside Facility 1,052.26             ‐                      3.97                   ‐                               1,056.23            705‐6045 16 Road and Bridge Benefit 7,735,750.81     2,411,074.91     32,550.96        385,591.67       10,564,968.35   562 17 Regional Park 1,940,879.48      ‐                      4,917.46           ‐                                ‐                     1,945,796.94     568 18 Alley In‐Leiu Facility ‐                      ‐                      550 19 Sewer Capacity 4,359,993.22     5,896,211.22     16,441.03        (6,752,113.24)           3,520,532.23     705‐6005 20 South West Water 7,385.76             ‐                      27.85                 ‐                               7,413.61            705‐6035 21 4th Street Extension 101,416.82         ‐                      382.43              ‐                               101,799.25        705‐6060 22 Willow Springs 72,909.94           ‐                      274.93              ‐                               73,184.87          705‐6065 23 Recreational Facilities 1,238,623.10     847,937.94        4,844.41           ‐                               2,091,405.45     555 24 Police Facilities 1,011,812.51     514,075.82        3,672.24          (222,860.21)              1,306,700.36     559 25 Community Park Development 1,177,004.81     968,166.08        4,325.04          (20,500.00)                 (237,332.00)      1,891,663.93     567 26 Neighborhood Park Development 1,545,416.48     1,171,643.15     5,582.24          7,775.80            (287,211.00)      2,443,206.67     569 Totals 32,017,772.53   15,614,989.94   116,825.72      (7,338,346.51)           393,367.47       (524,543.00)      40,353,786.77 Summary of Expenditures and Transfers to Projects and Debt Service on Bonds FY21/22 expendit Project #
% Funded by
Fees Amount
CF104 100% 131,596.03
2016‐001 100% 86,479.85
2016‐003 9,762.20
2017‐005 5,822,798.98
2017‐006 412,677.28
2017‐012 100% 28,323.25
P‐01 100% 20,500.00
PS‐01 New Police Station Feasibility Study 89,939.22
PS‐04 132,920.99
R‐11 86,711.73
WW‐04 16,053.98
Debt Service 6% 500,583.00
Total 7,338,346.51
Summary of Unexpended Approved Funds to Projects
Project #Amount
Source of Funds
CF104 City Hall and Building B BSFF Facility 617,523.88 2017‐001 Pennsylvania Avenue (WRCOG) Road and Bridge Benefit 3,590,838.14 2017‐005 WWTP Exp PH1 & Adv R/O Recycled Water 3,101,052.40 2017‐005 WWTP Exp PH1 & Adv R/O Sewer Capacity 82,472.34 2017‐006 Brine Line to S.B. Sewer Capacity 1,247,049.58 2017‐009 Pennsylvania Widening Road and Bridge Benefit 1,222,693.53 2017‐012 Pennsylvania Ave/UPR Grade Seperation Railroad Crossing 933,522.24 2017‐012 Pennsylvania Ave/UPR Grade Seperation Road and Bridge Benefit 750,000.00 2017‐028 Potrero Fire Station Fire Facility 4,100,000.00 2019‐009 2nd Street Extension Design Road and Bridge Benefit 48,563.74 P‐01 Stewart Park Splash Park Community Park Development 1,024,853.51 P‐02 Rangel Park Splash Park Neighborhood Park Development 500,000.00 P‐03 Nicklaus Park Splash Park Neighborhood Park Development 850,000.00 P‐04 Sports Park Field Lighting & Field Expansion Regional Park 1,000,000.00 P‐05 Nicklaus Park Field Lighting & Field Expansion Regional Park 900,000.00 P‐06 Sports Park Support Building for Leagues Recreational Facilities 300,000.00 P‐07 Nicklaus Park Support Building for Leagues Recreational Facilities 300,000.00 P‐08 Nicklaus Park Skate Park Recreational Facilities 300,000.00 PS‐01 New Police Station Feasibility Study Police Facilities 160,060.78 R‐01 Oak Valley Parkway Expansion I10‐Desert Lawn Ph 2 Road and Bridge Benefit 600,000.00 R‐02 Citywide Traffic Signal Upgrade & Capacity Improvement Ph 1 Traffic Signal 147,200.00 R‐11 Citywide Traffic Signal Upgrade & Capacity Improvement Ph 2 Traffic Signal 63,288.27 WW‐04 16" Mesa Force Main and Pump Replacement Design Sewer Capacity 390,300.28 Total 22,229,418.69
Exhibit A
WWTP Exp PH 1 & Advanced R/O
Brine Pipeline to San Bernardino
Pennsylvania Ave/UPR Grade Seperation
Potrero Interchange
Description
Description
City Hall and Building B
Oak Valley/I‐10 Interchange Traffic Signals
Stewart Park Splash Park
Wastewater 2018 Revenue Bonds Debt Service Payment
Public Safety Radio System Upgrade
Citywide Traffic Signal Upgrade PH2
16" Mesa Force Main and Pump Replacement Design

Summary of AB1600 Development Impact Transfers In
Report # Description Transfers In
1 Traffic Signal
2 Railroad Crossing
3 Fire Facility
4 BSFF Facility
5 Emergency Prepardeness
6 General Plan
7 Recylced Water
8 Noble Creek Sewer
9 Trunk Maint Facility
10 Upper Potrero Sewer
11 Lower Potrero Sewer
12 San Timoteo Sewer
13 Eastide Facility
14 Westside Facility
15 Road and Bridge Benefit 385,591.67
16 CFD ‐ TUMF
17 Regional Park
18 Alley In‐Leiu Facility
19 Sewer Capacity
20 South West Water
21 4th Street Extension
22 Willow Springs
23 Recreational Facilities
24 Police Facilities
25 Community Park Development
26 Neighborhood Park Development 7,775.80
Totals 393,367.47
Summary of Transfer Ins by Projects
Project #Amount
2016‐003 Potrero Interchange 385,591.67
P‐02 Rangel Park Splash Park 7,775.80
Totals 393,367.47
Exhibit B
Description

Summary of Future Projects**
Project #Amount
Source of Funds
R‐12 Road and Bridge 1,500,000.00
2017‐009 Road and Bridge 1,200,000.00
2017‐001 Road and Bridge 2,800,000.00
R‐13 Trffic Signal 150,000.00
PS‐06 Police Facilities 750,000.00
PS‐07 Police Facilities 700,000.00
WW‐09 Sewer Capacity 2,000,000.00
WW‐10 Sewer Capacity 750,000.00
WW‐11 Sewer Capacity 900,000.00
Totals 10,750,000.00
Mesa Lift Station ‐ Construction
Citywide Traffic Signal Upgrade & Capacity Improvement PH 3 Building C Renovation
New Police Station Design
16" Mesa Force Maint Construction
Mesa Lift Station Pump Capactiy Enhancement Construction Exhibit C
Description
2nd Street Extension Construction
Additional funds for Pennsylvania Widening
Additional funds for Pennsylvania Avenue/Ramp Additions

Attachment 1

CITY OF BEAUMONT
ANNUAL COMPLIANCE REPORT FOR AB 1600

TRAFFIC SIGNAL IMPACT FEES
Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2022
For the purpose of compliance with Government Code Subsection 66006(b)(1), the following information regarding AB 1600 fees is presented:

For each separate account or fund established pursuant to subdivision (a), the local agency shall, within 180 days after the last day of each fiscal year, make available to the public the following information for the fiscal year:

(A) A brief description of the type of fee in the account or fund.

Traffic Signal Impact Fee – The purpose of this fee is to finance the construction of traffic signals and improvements needed to maintain traffic movement and safety on City streets.

These fees provide the above described project funding to accommodate traffic generated by future development within the City.

(B) The amount of the fee.

Dev
Units 1
Impact Fee
Per Unit 1
Updated
1/1/2022 1, 2
Residential-Single Family DU $272.89 $294.91
Residential-Multi- Family DU $183.34 $198.14
Residential-Mobile Home DU $159.07 $171.91
Commercial, KSF $337.02 $364.22
2222227
322222
2222222
2221111
11114
Industrial/Business Park KSF $231.88 $250.59
8777777 Industrial/High-Cube WH KSF
$
$32.36 $34.97
1 Development Units--DU = dwelling unit; KSF = 1,000 gross square feet of building area. 2 Net Impact Fee (Gross $272.89 less 1% Administration portion $2.73).

(C) The beginning and ending balance of the account or fund.

(D) The amount of the fees collected and the interest earned.

Beginning – July 1, 2021 $1,620.542.13
Plus: Fees Collected 179.997.81
Interest 4.544.24
Less: Expenditure (182.953.78)
Refunds

(0)

Ending June 30, 2022
(A) An
identifi
cation
of each
public
improv
ement
on
which
$1,622,130..40

(E) An identification of each public improvement on which fees were expended and the amount of the expenditures on each improvement, including the total percentage of the cost of the public improvement that was funded with fees.

No direct expenditures were made for these public improvements during this fiscal year. Page 438 of 877

(F) An identification of an approximate date by which the con struction of the public improvement will commence if the local agency determines that sufficient funds have been collected to complete financing on an incomplete public improvement, as identified in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 66001, and the public improvement remains incomplete.

Engineering, design and planning work has been completed for two signals at Oak Valley Blvd and I10 off and on Ramps. Studies have started on planning of up to potentially signalizing 5 additional intersections throughout the City. The signals identified are to be completed in the next three years, or as soon as they are warranted.

(G) A description of each interfund transfer or loan made from the account or fund, including the public improvement on which the transferred or loaned fees will be expended, and, in the case of an interfund loan, the date on which the loan will be repaid and the rate of interest that the account or fund will receive on the loan.

Transfers were made to the following projects:
2016-001 Oak Valley/Interchange Traffic Signal $86.479.85 2016-003 Potrero Interchange $ 9,762.20 *2016-003
was
Is an accounting error and should have transferred
from

From road and bridge and will be corrected.

(H) The amount of refunds made pursuant to subdivision (e) Section 66001 and any allocation pursuant to subdivision (f) of Section 66001.

Refunds of $0 occurred in FY2022.

Attachment 2

CITY OF BEAUMONT
ANNUAL COMPLIANCE REPORT FOR AB1600

RAILROAD CROSSING FACILITY FEE
Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2021
For the purpose of compliance with Government Code Subsection 66006(b)(1), the following information regarding AB 1600 fees is presented:

For each separate account or fund established pursuant to subdivision (a), the local agency shall, within 180 days after the last day of each fiscal year, make available to the public the following information for the fiscal year:

(A) A brief description of the type of fee in the account or fund.

Railroad Crossing Facility Fee - The purpose of this fee is to finance the construction of Railroad Crossings, traffic signals, improvements needed to maintain traffic movement and safety on City streets. These fees provide the above described project funding to accommodate traffic generated by future development within the City.

(B) The amount of the fee.

Dev
Units 1
Impact Fee
Per Unit 1
Updated
1/1/2022 1 2
Residential-Single Family DU $293.26 $316.92
Residential-Multi-Family DU $197.03 $212.93
Residential-Mobile Home DU $170.95 $184.74
Commercial KSF $362.18
444444
444444
444440
0444
$391.40
Industrial-Business Park KSF $249.18
111
$269.29
Industrial-High-Cube WH KSF $34.77 $37.57
1 Development Units--DU = dwelling unit; KSF = 1,000 gross square feet of building area. 2 Net Impact Fee (Gross $293.26 less 1% Administration portion $2.93).

(C) The beginning and ending balance of the account or fund.

(D) The amount of the fees collected and the interest earned.

Beginning – July 1, 2021 $2,311,038.86
Plus: Fees Collected 242,393.23
Interest 6,636.63
Less: Expenditure (28,323.25)
Refunds

(0.00)
Ending June 30, 2022 $2,605,466.09

(E) An identification of each public improvement on which fees were expended and the amount of the expenditures on each improvement, including the total percentage of the cost of the public improvement that was funded with fees.

No direct expenditures were made for these public improvements during this fiscal year. Page 440 of 877

(F) An identification of an approximate date by which the construction of the public improvement will commence if the local agency determines that sufficient funds have been collected to complete financing on an incomplete public improvement, as identified in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 66001, and the public improvement remains incomplete.

Preliminary Engineering, design and planning work for the Pennsylvania Avenue Grade Separation began in FY2017/18 and is completed. Preliminary design work for the California Avenue Grade Separation Project began in FY2017/18 and is also completed.

In July of 2022, Final Engineering resumed for the Pennsylvania Avenue Grade Separation. Completion of engineering is expected in early 2024. Construction for this project is currently unfunded.

(G) A description of each interfund transfer or loan made from the account or fund, including the public improvement on which the transferred or loaned fees will be expended, and, in the case of an interfund loan, the date on which the loan will be repaid and the rate of interest that the account or fund will receive on the loan.

2017-012 Pennsylvania Ave/UPR Grade Separation $28,323.25

(H) The amount of refunds made pursuant to subdivision (e) Section 66001 and any allocation pursuant to subdivision (f) of Section 66001.

No refunds were made this FY

Attachment 3

CITY OF BEAUMONT
ANNUAL COMPLIANCE REPORT FOR AB 1600

FIRE STATION FACILITY FEE
Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2022
For the purpose of compliance with Government Code Subsection 66006(b)(1), the following information regarding AB 1600 fees is presented:

For each separate account or fund established pursuant to subdivision (a), the local agency shall, within 180 days after the last day of each fiscal year, make available to the public the following information for the fiscal year:

(A) brief description of the type of fee in the account or fund.

Fire Facility Fee – The Fee is used to fund the design, permitting, administration, acquisition, construction of fire station facilities and equipment necessary to serve future development in the City.

(B) The amount of the fee.

Dev
Units 1
Impact Fee
Per Unit 1
Updated
1/1/2022 1 2
Residential-Single Family DU $576.29 $664.52
Residential-Multi-Family DU $184.42 $212.65
Residential-Mobile Home DU $276.63 $318.98
Commercial KSF $211.67 $244.08
Industrial-Business Park KSF $176.40 $203.41
Industrial-High-Cube WH KSF $132.30 $152.56
1 Development Units--DU = dwelling unit; KSF = 1,000 gross square feet of building area. 2 Net Impact Fee (Gross $576.29 less 1% Administration portion $5.76).

(C) The beginning and ending balance of the account or fund.

(D) The amount of the fees collected and the interest earned.

Beginning – July 1, 2021 $ 4,597,214.37
Plus: Fees Collected 472,975.23
Interest 13,116.35
Less: Expenditure

(0)

Refunds ___(0)
Ending – June 30, 2022 $ 5,083,305.95

(E) An identification of each public improvement on which fees were expended and the amount of the expenditures on each improvement, including the total percentage of the cost of the public improvement that was funded with fees.

No direct expenditures were made for these public improvements during this fiscal year.

(F) An identification of an approximate date by which the construction of the public improvement will commence if the local agency determines that sufficient funds have been collected to complete financing on an incomplete public improvement, as identified in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 66001, and the public improvement remains incomplete.

Engineering, design and planning work for Fire Station 106 began in FY2017/18 and is completed. Final Architecture and Engineering has been completed and construction began in October of 2022. This project is scheduled to be complete by the end of 2023.

(G) A description of each interfund transfer or loan made from the account or fund, including the public improvement on which the transferred or loaned fees will be expended, and, in the case of an interfund loan, the date on which the loan will be repaid and the rate of interest that the account or fund will receive on the loan.

City Council appropriated unused bond proceeds for this project, funds that had been funded by this DIF were transferred back into the DIF fund.

(H) The amount of refunds made pursuant to subdivision (e) Section 66001 and any allocation pursuant to subdivision (f) of Section 66001.

No refunds this FY 21/22.

Attachment 4

CITY OF BEAUMONT
ANNUAL COMPLIANCE REPORT FOR AB 1600

PUBLIC FACILITY FEE
Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2022
For the purpose of compliance with Government Code Subsection 66006(b)(1), the following information regarding AB 1600 fees is presented:

For each separate account or fund established pursuant to subdivision (a), the local agency shall, within 180 days after the last day of each fiscal year, make available to the public the following information for the fiscal year:

(A) A brief description of the type of fee in the acco unt or fund.

BSFF Facility Fee – This fee is required to maintain present basic services and to offset the ever-increasing demand caused in part by construction of new residential development and that said fee is necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health and safety.

In January 2018, BSFF Facility Fee was renamed to Public Facility Fee.

(B) The amount of the fee.

Dev
Units 1
Impact Fee
Per Unit 1
Updated
1/1/2022 1 2
Residential-Single Family DU $424.23 $489.18
Residential-Multi-Family DU $356.89 $411.53
Residential-Mobile Home DU $394.60 $455.01
Commercial KSF $94.28 $108.71
Industrial-Business Park KSF $65.99 $76.09
Industrial-High-Cube WH KSF $37.71 $43.48
1 Development Units--DU = dwelling unit; KSF = 1,000 gross square feet of building area. 2 Net Impact Fee (Gross $424.23 less 1% Administration portion $4.24).

(C) The beginning and ending balance of the account or fund.

(D) The amount of the fees collected and the interest earned.

Beginning – July 1, 2021 $1,035,995.94
Plus: Fees Collected 439,312.70
Interest 3,635.53
Less: Expenditure (131,596.03)
Refunds (0.00)
Ending – June 30, 2022 $1,347,348.14

(E) An identification of each public improvement on which fees were expended and the amount of the expenditures on each improvement, including the total percentage of the cost of the public improvement that was funded with fees.

No direct expenditures were made for these public improvements during this fiscal year.

(F) An identification of an approximate date by which the construction of the public improvement will commence if the local agency determines that sufficient funds have been collected to complete financing on an incomplete public improvement, as identified in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 66001, and the public improvement remains incomplete.

Conceptual design work for City Hall complex was completed in FY 2018/19. Phase 1 expansion was designed and completed September 2018.The facility is undergoing additional expansion planning and design with construction next calendar year.

(G) A description of each interfund transfer or loan made from the account or fund, including the public improvement on which the transferred or loaned fees will be expended, and, in the case of an interfund loan, the date on which the loan will be repaid and the rate of interest that the account or fund will receive on the loan.

Transfers were made to the following project
CF104X City Hall and Building B $131,596.03

.
(H) The amount of refunds made pursuant to s ubdivision (e) Section 66001 and any allocation pursuant to subdivision (f) of Section 66001.

No refunds were made this FY

Attachment 5

CITY OF BEAUMONT
ANNUAL COMPLIANCE REPORT FOR AB 1600

EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS FEE
Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2022
For the purpose of compliance with Government Code Subsection 66006(b)(1), the following information regarding AB 1600 fees is presented:

For each separate account or fund established pursuant to subdivision (a), the local agency shall, within 180 days after the last day of each fiscal year, make available to the public the following information for the fiscal year:

(A) A brief description of the type of fee in the account or fund.

Emergency Preparedness Fee – This fee is established for the purpose of continuing growth of the City of Beaumont combined with the expectation of high quality services by its citizens, and has been a catalyst for review of City’s existing and future public facilities, as well as a variety of emergencies, near-disasters which provides care for its citizens during disasters and other emergencies affecting public health and welfare.

(B) The amount of the fee.

Dev
Units 1
Impact Fee
Per Unit 1
Residential-Single Family DU $729.63
Residential-Duplex/Multi DU $729.63
Residential-Mobile Home DU $729.63
Commercial KSF .22/SF
Industrial KSF .22/SF
1 Development Units--DU = dwelling unit; KSF = 1,000 gross square feet of building area.

(C) The beginning and ending balance of the account or fund.

(D) The amount of the fees collected and the interest earned.

Beginning – July 1, 2021 $ (928,736.64)
Plus: Fees Collected 831,470.64
Interest .00
Less: Expenditure (.00)
Refunds (0.00)
Ending – June 30, 2022 $ (97,266.00)

(E) An identification of each public improvement on which fees were expended and the amount of the expenditures on each improvement, including the total percentage of the cost of the public improvement that was funded with fees.

No expenditures were made for these public improvements durin g this fiscal year. This fund has been negative for many years, will only collect the fee until the fund is made whole.

(F) An identification of an approximate date by which the construction of the public improvement will commence if the local agency determines that sufficient funds have been collected to complete financing on an incomplete public improvement, as identified in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 66001, and the public improvement remains incomplete.

This fund has been over allocated; Current fees collected are paying for previously completed project. Future projects will be proposed once the fees accumulate again .

(G) A description of each interfund transfer or loan made from the account or fund, including the public improvement on which the transferred or loaned fees will be expended, and, in the case of an interfund loan, the date on which the loan will be repaid and the rate of interest that the account or fund will receive on the loan.

No interfund transfers or loans were made during the fiscal year utilizing these funds. (H) The amount of refunds made pursuant to subdivision (e) Section 66001 and any allocation pursuant to subdivision (f) of Section 66001.

No refunds were made for this FY.

Attachment 6

CITY OF BEAUMONT
ANNUAL COMPLIANCE REPORT FOR AB 1600

GENERAL PLAN FEE (GPE)
Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2022
For the purpose of compliance with Government Code Subsection 66006(b)(1), the following information regarding AB 1600 fees is presented:

For each separate account or fund established pursuant to subdivision (a), the local agency shall, within 180 days after the last day of each fiscal year, make available to the public the following information for the fiscal year:

(A) A brief description of the type of fee in the account or fund.

GPF Fee – The purpose of this fee is to finance updates to the City’s General Plan.

(B) The amount of the fee.

Dev
Units 1
Impact Fee
Per Unit 1
Residential DU $50.00
Residential-Mobile Home DU $35.00
Commercial, Industrial KSF .05/SF
Hotel/Motel PR 35.00 PR
Recreational Vehicle Park PS .$25.00 PS
1 Development Units--DU = dwelling unit; KSF = 1,000 gross square feet of building area; PR is per room; PS is per RV space

(C) The beginning and ending balance of the account or fund.

(D) The amount of the fees collected and the interest earned.

Beginning – July 1, 2021 $15,057.00
Plus: Fees Collected 87,226.25
Interest 175,.67
Less: Expenditure (0)
Ending – June 30, 2022 $15,057.00

(E) An identification of each public improvement on which fees were expended and the amount of the expenditures on each improvement, including the total percentage of the cost of the public improvement that was funded with fees.

No expenditures were made for these public improvements during this fiscal year.

(F) An identification of an approximate date by which the construction of the public improvement will commence if the local agency determines Page 448 of 877

that sufficient funds have been collected to complete financing on an incomplete public improvement, as identified in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 66001, and the public improvement remains incomplete.

Contract for General Plan Update was awarded to Raimi and Associates on December 6, 2016. The update is completed and adopted by City Council. Accumulated fees will go to the next update.

(G) A description of each interfund transfer or loan made from the account or fund, including the public improvement on which the transferred or loaned fees will be expended, and, in the case of an interfund loan, the date on which the loan will be repaid and the rate of interest that the account or fund will receive on the loan.

Transfers were made to the following project:

No transfers were made

(H) The amount of refunds made pursuant to subdivision (e) Section 66001 and any allocation pursuant to subdivision (f) of Section 66001.

No refunds were made this FY

Attachment 7

CITY OF BEAUMONT
ANNUAL COMPLIANCE REPORT FOR AB 1600

RECYCLED WATER FACILITY FEE
Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2022
For the purpose of compliance with Government Code Subsection 66006(b)(1), the following information regarding AB 1600 fees is presented:

For each separate account or fund established pursuant to subdivision (a), the local agency shall, within 180 days after the last day of each fiscal year, make available to the public the following information for the fiscal year:

(A) A brief description of the type of fee in the account or fund.

Recycled Water Facility Fee – The purpose of this fee is to make provisions for assessing and collecting fees referred to as “water facilities fees” as a condition of issuing a permit for development of any portion of land which is benefitted by the acquisition and construction of the of the Southwest Properties Water Project for the purpose of defraying the actual or estimated cost of construction of the improvements.

(B) The amount of the fee.

Dev
Units 1
Impact Fee
Per Unit 1
Sewer EDU DU/EDU $786.64
1 Development Units--DU = dwelling unit; KSF = 1,000 gross square feet of building area.

(C) The beginning and ending balance of the account or fund.

(D) The amount of the fees collected and the interest earned.

Beginning – July 1, 2021 $2,837,178.63
Plus: Fees Collected 1,382,580.62
Interest 10,652.18
Less: Expenditure (0)
Refunds (0.00)
Ending – June 30, 2022 $4,230,411.43

(E) An identification of each public improvement on which fees were expended and the amount of the expenditures on each improvement, including the total percentage of the cost of the public improvement that was funded with fees.

No expenditures were made for these public improvements during this fiscal year.

(F) An identification of an approximate date by which the construction of the public improvement will commence if the local agency determines that sufficient funds have been collected to complete financing on an incomplete public improvement, as identified in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 66001, and the public improvement remains incomplete.

Engineering, design and planning work has been performed for upgrades to the Wastewater Treatment Plant to produce recycled water. The construction of the new facility began October 2018 and the WWTP now has the capability to produ ce recycled water as of November 2022.

(G) A description of each interfund transfer or loan made from the account or fund, including the public improvement on which the transferred or loaned fees will be expended, and, in the case of an interfund loan, the date on which the loan will be repaid and the rate of interest that the account or fund will receive on the loan.

(H) The amount of refunds made pursuant to subdivision (e) Section 66001 and any allocation pursuant to subdivision (f) of Section 66001.

No refunds were made in this FY

Attachment 8

CITY OF BEAUMONT

ANNUAL COMPLIANCE REPORT FOR AB
1600 NOBLE CREEK SEWER MAIN FACILITY
FEES
Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2022
For the purpose of compliance with Government Code Subsection 66006(b)(1), the following information regarding AB 1600 fees is presented:

For each separate account or fund established pursuant to subdivision (a), the local agency shall, within 180 days after the last day of each fiscal year, make available to the public the following information for the fiscal year:

(A) A brief description of the type of fee in the account or fund.

Noble Creek Sewer Main Facility Fee – The Purpose of this fee is for the finance of construction for sewer force main and related infrastructure.

(B) The amount of the fee.

Dev
Units 1
Impact Fee
Per Unit 1
EDU/DU $173
1 Development Units--DU = dwelling unit; KSF = 1,000 gross square feet of building area.

(C) The beginning and ending balance of the account or fund.

(D) The amount of the fees collected and the interest earned.

Beginning – July 1, 2021 $ 54,772.72
Plus: Fees Collected 31,742.25
Interest 206.54
Less: Expenditure (0.00)
Refunds (0.00)
Ending – June 30, 2022 $86,721.51
.54,638.6
6 (E) An identification of an approximate date by which the construction of the public improvement will commence if the local agency determines that sufficient funds have been collected to complete financing on an incomplete public improvement, as identified in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 66001, and the public improvement remains incomplete.

No expenditures were made for these public improvements during this fiscal year

(F) A description of each interfund transfer or loan made from the account or fund, including the public improvement on which the transferred or loaned fees will be expended, and, in the case of an interfund loan, Page 452 of 877

the date on which the loan will be repaid and the rate of interest that the account or fund will receive on the loan.

Wastewater Master Plan was awarded November 2019 and the final plan was adopted in January 2022. Hydraulic analysis with potential future development will identify capacity needs for the collection system.

(G) A description of each interfund transfer or loan made from the account or fund, including the public improvement on which the transferred or loaned fees will be expended, and, in the case of an interfund loan, the date on which the loan will be repaid and the rate of interest that the account or fund will receive on the loan

Transfers were made to the following project:

No interfund transfers or loans were made during the fiscal year utilizing these funds.

(H) The amount of refunds made pursuant to subdivision (e) Section 66001 and any allocation pursuant to subdivision (f) of Section 66001.

No refunds were made during the fiscal year.

Attachment 9

CITY OF BEAUMONT
ANNUAL COMPLIANCE REPORT FOR AB 1600

SOUTHERN TRUNK MAIN SEWER
Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2022
For the purpose of compliance with Government Code Subsection 66006(b)(1), the following information regarding AB 1600 fees is presented:

For each separate account or fund established pursuant to subdivision (a), the local agency shall, within 180 days after the last day of each fiscal year, make available to the public the following information for the fiscal year:

(A) A brief description of the type of fee in the account or fund.

Trunk Main Facility Fee – The purpose of this fee is to establish and generate revenues sufficient to install sewer trunk main, bridge and major thoroughfare transportation facilities.

(B) The amount of the fee.

Dev
Units 1
Impact Fee
Per Unit 1
DU $90.15
1 Development Units--DU = dwelling unit; KSF = 1,000 gross square feet of building area.

(C) The beginning and ending balance of the account or fund.

(D) The amount of the fees collected and the interest earned.

Beginning – July 1, 2021 $268,062.02
Plus: Fees Collected 11,134.43
Interest 1,010.83
Less: Expenditure (0.00)
Refunds (0)
Ending – June 30, 2022 $280,207.28

No
expendi
tures
were
made
for
these
public
improve
ments
during
this
fiscal
year

(E) An identification of an approximate date by which the construction of the public improvement will commence if the local agency determines that sufficient funds have been collected to complete financing on an incomplete public improvement, as identified in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 66001, and the public improvement remains incomplete.

No expenditures were made for these public improvements during this fiscal year

(F) A description of each interfund transfer or loan made from the account or fund, including the public improvement on which the transferred or loaned fees will be expended, and, in the case of an interfund loan, Page 454 of 877

the date on which the loan will be repaid and the rate of interest that the account or fund will receive on the loan.

Wastewater Master Plan was awarded November 2019 and the final plan was adopted in January 2022. Hydraulic analysis with potential future development will identify capacity needs for the collection system.

(G) A description of each interfund transfer or loan made from the account or fund, including the public improvement on which the transferred or loaned fees will be expended, and, in the case of an interfund loan, the date on which the loan will be repaid and the rate of interest that the account or fund will receive on the loan

No interfund transfers or loans were made during the fiscal year utilizing these funds.

(H) The amount of refunds made pursuant to subdivision (e) Section 66001 and any allocation pursuant to subdivision (f) of Section 66001.

No refunds were made this FY 21/22.

Attachment 10

CITY OF BEAUMONT
ANNUAL COMPLIANCE REPORT FOR AB 1600

UPPER POTRERO SEWER FACILITY
FEES
Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2022
For the purpose of compliance with Government Code Subsection 66006(b)(1), the following information regarding AB 1600 fees is presented:

For each separate account or fund established pursuant to subdivision (a), the local agency shall, within 180 days after the last day of each fiscal year, make available to the public the following information for the fiscal year:

(A) A brief description of the type of fee in the account or fund.

Upper Potrero Sewer Facility Fee – The Purpose of this fee is to finance sewer mains, force mains, and other sewer related infrastructures.

(B) The amount of the fee.

Dev
Units 1
Impact Fee
Per Unit 1
EDU/DU $251.66
1 Development Units--DU = dwelling unit; KSF = 1,000 gross square feet of building area.

(C) The beginning and ending balance of the account or fund.

(D) The amount of the fees collected and the interest earned.

Beginning – July 1, 2021 $92,482.85

93,026.98
Plus: Fees Collected 0.0
33,178 Interest 348.74
Less: Expenditure (0.00)
Refunds (0)
Ending – June 30, 2022 $92,831.59
93,0

26.98 .00
(I) identific
ation of
an
approxi
mate
date by
which
the
constru
ction of
the
public
improv
ement
will
comme

(E) An identification of an approximate date by which the construction of the public improvement will commence if the local agency determines that sufficient funds have been collected to complete financing on an incomplete public improvement, as identified in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 66001, and the public improvement remains incomplete.

No expenditures were made for these public improvements during this fiscal year

(F) An identification of an approximate date by which the construction of the public improvement will commence if the local agency determines that sufficient funds have been collected to complete financing on an Page 456 of 877

incomplete public improvement, as identified in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 66001, and the public improvement remains incomplete.

Wastewater Master Plan was awarded November 2019 and the final plan was adopted in January 2022. Hydraulic analysis with potential future development will identify capacity needs for the collection system.

(G) A description of each interfund transfer or loan made from the account or fund, including the public improvement on which the transferred or loaned fees will be expended, and, in the case of an interfund loan, the date on which the loan will be repaid and the rate of interest that the account or fund will receive on the loan.

No interfund transfers or loans were made during the fiscal year utilizing these funds (H) The amount of refunds made pursuant to subdivision (e) Section 66001 and any allocation pursuant to subdivision (f) of Section 66001.

No refunds were made this FY 21/22.

Attachment 11

CITY OF BEAUMONT
ANNUAL COMPLIANCE REPORT FOR AB 1600

LOWER POTRERO SEWER FACILITY FEES
Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2022
For the purpose of compliance with Government Code Subsection 66006(b)(1), the following information regarding AB 1600 fees is presented:

For each separate account or fund established pursuant to subdivision (a), the local agency shall, within 180 days after the last day of each fiscal year, make available to the public the following information for the fiscal year:

(A) A brief description of the type of fee in the account or fund.

Lower Potrero Sewer Facility Fees – The Purpose of this fee is to finance sewer mains, force mains, and other sewer related infrastructures.

(B) The amount of the fee.

Dev
Units 1
Impact Fee
Per Unit 1
DU $492.16
1 Development Units--DU = dwelling unit; KSF = 1,000 gross square feet of building area.

(C) The beginning and ending balance of the account or fund.

(D) The amount of the fees collected and the interest earned.

Beginning – July 1, 2021 $ 542,653.75
Plus: Fees Collected 45,032.42
Interest 2,046.28
Less: Expenditure (0.00)
Refunds (.00)
Ending – June 30, 2022 $ 589,732.45

(F) An
identifi
cation
of an
approxi
mate
date by
which
the
constru
ction of
the
public
improv
ement
will

(E) An identification of an approximate date by which the construction of the public improvement will commence if the local agency determines that sufficient funds have been collected to complete financing on an incomplete public improvement, as identified in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 66001, and the public improvement remains incomplete.

No expenditures were made for these public improvements during this fiscal year

(F) An identification of an approximate date by which the construction of the public improvement will commence if the local agency determines that sufficient funds have been collected to complete financing on an incomplete public improvement, as identified in paragraph (2) of Page 458 of 877

subdivision (a) of Section 66001, and the public improvement remains incomplete.

Wastewater Master Plan was awarded November 2019 and the final plan was adopted in January 2022. Hydraulic analysis with potential future development will identify capacity needs for the collection system.

(G) A description of each interfund transfer or loan made from the account or fund, including the public improvement on which the transferred or loaned fees will be expended, and, in the case of an interfund loan, the date on which the loan will be repaid and the rate of interest that the account or fund will receive on the loan.

No interfund transfers or loans were made during the fiscal year utilizing these funds

(H) The amount of refunds made pursuant to subdivision (e) Section 66001 and any allocation pursuant to subdivision (f) of Section 66001.

No refunds were made during the fiscal year.

Attachment 12

CITY OF BEAUMONT
ANNUAL COMPLIANCE REPORT FOR AB 1600

SAN TIMOTEO SEWER FACILITY FEE
Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2022
For the purpose of compliance with Government Code Subsection 66006(b)(1), the following information regarding AB 1600 fees is presented:

For each separate account or fund established pursuant to subdivision (a), the local agency shall, within 180 days after the last day of each fiscal year, make available to the public the following information for the fiscal year:

(A) A brief description of the type of fee in the account or fund.

San Timoteo Sewer Facility Fees– This Fee Study calculates a proposed facility fee based upon the reasonable apportionment of sewer facility costs to measurable units of development in accordance with Government code Section 6600.

(B) The amount of the fee.

Dev
Units 1
Impact Fee
Per Unit 1
Lower Oak Valley Sewer EDU $996.55
Upper Oak Valley Sewer EDU $857.13
Beaumont Mesa Sewer EDU $241.94
Development Units--DU = dwelling unit; KSF = 1,000 gross square feet of building area.

(C) The beginning and ending balance of the account or fund.

(D) The amount of the fees collected and the interest earned.

Beginning – July 1, 2021 $ 277,89.55
Plus: Fees Collected 82,015.24
Interest 645.42
Less: Expenditure (.00)
Refunds (.00)
Ending – June 30, 2022 $360,149.67

(E) An identification of each public improvement on which fees were expended and the amount of the expenditures on each improvement, including the total percentage of the cost of the public improvement that was funded with fees.

No expenditures were made for these public improvements during this fiscal year.

(F) An identification of an approximate date by which the construction of the public improvement will commence if the local agency determines that sufficient funds have been collected to complete financing on an incomplete public improvement, as identified in paragraph 2) of

subdivision (a) of Section 66001, and the public improvement remains incomplete.

Wastewater Master Plan was awarded November 2019 and the final plas was adopted in January 2022. Hydraulic analysis with potential future development will identify capacity needs for the collection system.

(G) A description of each interfund transfer or loan made from the account or fund, including the public improvement on which the transferred or loaned fees will be expended, and, in the case of an interfund loan, the date on which the loan will be repaid and the rate of interest that the account or fund will receive on the loan.

Transfers were made to the following project:

No interfund transfers or loans were made during the fiscal year utilizing these funds

(H) The amount of refunds made pursuant to subdivision (e) Section 66001 and any allocation pursuant to subdivision (f) of Section 66001.

No refunds were made this FY 21/22.

Attachment 13

CITY OF BEAUMONT
ANNUAL COMPLIANCE REPORT FOR AB 1600

ROAD AND BRIDGE BENEFIT FACILITY FEE
Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2022
For the purpose of compliance with Government Code Subsection 66006(b)(1), the following information regarding AB 1600 fees is presented:

For each separate account or fund established pursuant to subdivision (a), the local agency shall, within 180 days after the last day of each fiscal year, make available to the public the following information for the fiscal year:

(A) A brief description of the type of fee in the account or fund.

Road and Bridge Benefit Facility Fee – This fee was established to prepare the Beaumont Road and Bridge District Area of Benefit District Fee Study to fairly and equitably allocate transportation facility cost for Required Improvemen ts in accordance with Ordinance No. 837 and AB 1600.

(B) The amount of the fee.

Dev
Units 1
Impact Fee
Per Unit 1
Updated
01/01/2022 1
2 Residential-Single Family DU $2,484.51 $2,685.01
Residential-Multi-Family DU $1,669.23 $1,803.94
Residential-Mobile Home DU $1,448..30 $1,565.17
Commercial KSF $3,068.44 $3,316.06
Industrial-Business Park KSF $2,111.08 $2,281.44
Industrial-High-Cube WH KSF $294.57 $318.34
1 Development Units--DU = dwelling unit; KSF = 1,000 gross square feet of building area. 2 Net Impact Fee (Gross $2,484.51 less 1% Administration portion $24.84).

(C) The beginning and ending balance of the account or fund.

(D) The amount of the fees collected and the interest earned.

Beginning – July 1, 2021 $7,735,750.81
Plus: Fees Collected 2,411,074.91
Interest 32,550.96
Transfers In 385,591.67 Less: Expenditure (0.00)
Refunds (0.00)
Ending – June 30, 2022 $ 10,564,968.35

(E) An identification of each public improvement on which fees were expended and the amount of the expenditures on each improvement, including the total percentage of the cost of the public improvement that was funded with fees.

No Direct expenditure was made during this fiscal year.

(F) An identification of an approximate date by which the construction of the public improvement will commence if the local agency determines that sufficient funds have
been collected to complete financing on an incomplete
public improvement, as identified in paragraph (2) of
subdivision (a) of Section 66001, and the public
improvement remains incomplete.

Engineering, design and planning work is currently being done for Potrero/I60 Interchange Project Phase 2. Construction for Phase 1 was completed in 2020.

Engineering, design and planning work for the Pennsylvania Avenue/I10 Interchange Project began in FY2017/18. Engineering, design and planning work for the Oak Valley Parkway/I10 Interchange Project is funded and is expected to begin in FY2023/24.

(G) A description of each interfund transfer or loan made from the account or fund, including the public improvement on which the transferred or loaned fees will be expended, and, in the case of an interfund loan, the date on which the loan will be repaid and the rate of interest that the account or fund will receive on the loan.

No transfers were made
(H) The amount of refunds made pursuant to subdivision (e) Section 66001 and any allocation pursuant to subdivision (f) of Section 66001.

No refunds were made in this FY.

Attachment 14

CITY OF BEAUMONT
ANNUAL COMPLIANCE REPORT FOR AB 1600

REGIONAL PARK FEE
Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2022
For the purpose of compliance with Government Code Subsection 66006(b)(1), the following information regarding AB 1600 fees is presented:

For each separate account or fund established pursuant to subdivision (a), the local agency shall, within 180 days after the last day of each fiscal year, make available to the public the following information for the fiscal year:

(A) A brief description of the type of fee in the account or fund.

Regional Park Fee – The purpose of this fee is to finance construction of regional parks and amenities.

Effective January 22, 2018, the Regional Park Fee was eliminated.

(B) The amount of the fee.

Dev
Units 1
Impact Fee
Per Unit 1
Multi- Family DU $N/A
Age Restricted DU $N/A
1 Development Units--DU = dwelling unit; KSF = 1,000 gross square feet of building area.

(C) The beginning and ending balance of the account or fund.

(D) The amount of the fees collected and the interest earned.

Beginning – July 1, 2021 $1,940,879.48
Plus: Fees Collected 0.00
Interest 4,917.46
Less: Expenditure (.00)
Refunds (0.00)
Ending – June 30, 2022 $1,945,796.94

(E) An identification of each public improvement on which fees were expended and the amount of the expenditures on each improvement, including the total percentage of the cost of the public improvement that was funded with fees.

No direct expenditures were made for these public improvements during this fiscal year.

(F) An identification of an approximate date by which the construction of the public improvement will commence if the local agency determines that sufficient funds have been collected to complete financing on an incomplete public improvement, as identified in paragraph (2) of

subdivision (a) of Section 66001, and the public improvement remains incomplete.

Funds will be used towards regional park improvements.

(G) A description of each interfund transfer or loan made from the account or fund, including the public improvement on which the transferred or loaned fees will be expended, and, in the case of an interfund loan, the date on which the loan will be repaid and the rate of interest that the account or fund will receive on the loan.

No interfund transfers or loans were made during the fiscal year utilizing these funds. (H) The amount of refunds made pursuant to subdivision (e) Section 66001 and any allocation pursuant to subdivision (f) of Section 66001.

No refunds were made during the fiscal year.

Attachment 15

CITY OF BEAUMONT
ANNUAL COMPLIANCE REPORT FOR AB 1600

SEWER CAPACITY FEE
Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2022
For the purpose of compliance with Government Code Subsection 66006(b)(1), the following information regarding AB 1600 fees is presented:

For each separate account or fund established pursuant to subdivision (a), the local agency shall, within 180 days after the last day of each fiscal year, make available to the public the following information for the fiscal year:

(A) A brief description of the type of fee in the account or fund.

Sewer Fee – The purpose of this fee is to finance the capacity increase in the Waste Water Treatment Plant.

(B) The amount of the fee.

Per Ordinance No. 1087, dated June 6, 2017

For permanent single-family residence (SFR) the fixed rate per Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU) $5,561.55
Effective January 1,2022 $5,923.05

Connection/Capacity for new non-SFR customers connecting to the City’s sewer system shall be calculated based on a multiple of EDUs based on the individual flow and strength characteristics of the new customer pursuant to a resolution of the City Council.

(C) The beginning and ending balance of the account or fund.

(D) The amount of the fees collected and the interest earned.

Beginning – July 1, 2021 $ 4,359,993.22
Plus: Fees Collected 5,896,211.22
Interest 16,441.03
Less: Expenditure (6,752,113.24)
Refunds (0)
Ending – June 30, 2022 $ 3,520,532.23

(E) An identification of each public improvement on which fees were expended and the amount of the expenditures on each improvement, including the total percentage of the cost of the public improvement that was funded with fees.

No expenditures were made for these public improvements during this fiscal year. Page 466 of 877

(F) An identification of an approximate date by which the construction of the public improvement will commence if the local agency determines that sufficient funds have been collected to complete financing on an incomplete public improvement, as identified in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 66001, and the public improvement remains incomplete.

The Wastewater Treatment Plant Expansion design was completed in December 2017.

Construction began in October 2018 and is completed.

(G) A description of each interfund transfer or loan made from the account or fund, including the public improvement on which the transferred or loaned fees will be expended, and, in the case of an interfund loan, the date on which the loan will be repaid and the rate of interest that the account or fund will receive on the loan.

Debt Service on Revenue Bonds $500,583
2017-005 Wastewater Treatment Plant Expansion $5,822,798.98 2017-006 Brineline Pipeline to San Bernardino $ 412,677.28 WW-04 16” Mesa Force Main and Pump Replacement Design $ 16,053.98

Used bond proceeds for previously paid invoices by DIF funds, moved funds back into this DIF that were covered by bond proceeds through Transfers In.

(H) The amount of refunds made pursuant to subdivision (e) Section 66001 and any allocation pursuant to subdivision (f) of Section 66001.

No refunds were made in this FY.

Attachment 17

CITY OF BEAUMONT
ANNUAL COMPLIANCE REPORT FOR AB 1600
4th STREET EXTENSION FEES
Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2022
For the purpose of compliance with Government Code Subsection 66006(b)(1), the following information regarding AB 1600 fees is presented:

For each separate account or fund established pursuant to subdivision (a), the local agency shall, within 180 days after the last day of each fiscal year, make available to the public the following information for the fiscal year:

(A) A brief description of the type of fee in the account or fund.

4TH Street Extension Fee – The purpose of this fee is to finance the construction of the extension of 4th Street. These fees provide the above described project funding to accommodate traffic generated by future development within the City

(B) The amount of the fee.

Dev
Units 1
Impact Fee
Per Unit 1
EDU $509.05
1 Development Units--DU = dwelling unit; KSF = 1,000 gross square feet of building area.

(C) The beginning and ending balance of the account or fund.

(D) The amount of the fees collected and the interest earned.

Beginning – July 1, 2021 $ 101,416.82
Plus: Fees Collected .00
Interest 382.43
Less: Expenditure (.00)
Refunds (.00)
Ending – June 30, 2022 $ 101,799.25

(E) An identification of each public improvement on which fees were expended and the amount of the expenditures on each improvement, including the total percentage of the cost of the public improvement that was funded with fees.

No expenditures were made for these public improvements during this fiscal year.

(F) An identification of an approximate date by which the construction of the public improvement will commence if the local agency determines that sufficient funds have been collected to complete financing on an incomplete public improvement, as identified in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 66001, and the public improvement remains incomplete.

Majority of 4th Street Extension has been completed through development projects.

These funds will be used to expand capacity in the future.

(G) A description of each interfund transfer or loan made from the account or fund, including the public improvement on which the transferred or loaned fees will be expended, and, in the case of an interfund loan, the date on which the loan will be repaid and the rate of interest that the account or fund will receive on the loan.

No interfund transfers or loans were made during the fiscal year utilizing these funds. (H) The amount of refunds made pursuant to subdivision (e) Section 66001 and any allocation pursuant to subdivision (f) of Section 66001.

No refunds were made during the fiscal year.

Attachment 18

CITY OF BEAUMONT
ANNUAL COMPLIANCE REPORT FOR AB 1600

WILLOW SPRINGS SEWER
Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2022
For the purpose of compliance with Government Code Subsection 66006(b)(1), the following information regarding AB 1600 fees is presented:

For each separate account or fund established pursuant to subdivision (a), the local agency shall, within 180 days after the last day of each fiscal year, make available to the public the following information for the fiscal year:

(A) A brief description of the type of fee in the account or fund.

Willow Springs Sewer Fee – The purpose of this fee is to establish and generate revenues sufficient to install sewer line facilities.

(B) The amount of the fee.

Dev
Units 1
Impact Fee
Per Unit 1
DU $453.80
1 Development Units--DU = dwelling unit; KSF = 1,000 gross square feet of building area.

(C) The beginning and ending balance of the account or fund.

(D) The amount of the fees collected and the interest earned.

Beginning – July 1, 2021 $72,909.94
Plus: Fees Collected .00
Interest 274.93
Less: Expenditure (.00)
Refunds (.00)
Ending – June 30, 2022 $ 73,184.87

(E) An identification of each public improvement on which fees were expended and the amount of the expenditures on each improvement, including the total percentage of the cost of the public improvement that was funded with fees.

No expenditures were made for these public improvements during this fiscal year.

(F) An identification of an approximate date by which the construction of the public improvement will commence if the local agency determines that sufficient funds have been collected to complete financing on an incomplete public improvement, as identified in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 66001, and the public improvement remains incomplete.

Wastewater Master Plan was awarded November 2019 and the final plan was adopted in January 2022. Hydraulic analysis with potential future development will identify capacity needs for the collection system.

(G) A description of each interfund transfer or loan made from the account or fund, including the public improvement on which the transferred or loaned fees will be expended, and, in the case of an interfund loan, the date on which the loan will be repaid and the rate of interest t hat the account or fund will receive on the loan.

No interfund transfers or loans were made during the fiscal year utilizing these funds. (H) The amount of refunds made pursuant to subdivision (e) Section 66001 and any allocation pursuant to subdivision (f) of Section 66001.

No refunds were made during the fiscal year.

Attachment 19

CITY OF BEAUMONT
ANNUAL COMPLIANCE REPORT FOR AB 1600

RECREATIONAL FACILITY FEE
Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2022
For the purpose of compliance with Government Code Subsection 66006(b)(1), the following information regarding AB 1600 fees is presented:

For each separate account or fund established pursuant to subdivision (a), the local agency shall, within 180 days after the last day of each fiscal year, make available to the public the following information for the fiscal year:

(A) A brief description of the type of fee in the account or fund.

Recreational Facility Fee – The purpose of this fee is to finance additional recreation facilities to serve the future development.

Fee is effective January 22, 2019.

(B) The amount of the fee.

Dev
Units 1
Impact Fee Updated
Per Unit1 2 01/01/20221 2
Residential-Single Family DU $725.07 $783.58
Residential-Multi-Family DU $609.99 $659.21
Residential-Mobile Home DU $674.44 $728.86
1 Development Units--DU = dwelling unit; KSF = 1,000 gross square feet of building area. 2 Net Impact Fee (Gross $725.07 less 1% Administration portion $7.25).

(C) The beginning and ending balance of the account or fund.

(D) The amount of the fees collected and the interest earned.

Beginning – July 1, 2021 $1,238,623.10
Plus: Fees Collected 847,937.94
Interest 4,844.41 Less: Expenditure (0.00) Refunds (0.00) Ending – June 30, 2022 $ 2,091,405.45

(E) An identification of each public improvement on which fees were expended and the

.

amount of the expenditures on each improvement, including the total percentage of the cost of the public improvement that was funded with fees.

No direct expenditures were made for these public improvement during this fiscal year.

(F) An identification of an approximate date by which the construction of the public improvement will commence if the local agency determines that sufficient funds have been collected to complete financing on an incomplete public improvement, as identified in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 66001, and the public improvement remains incomplete.

Funds will be used towards expansion or additional recreational facilities.

(G) A description of each interfund transfer or loan made from the account or fund, including the public improvement on which the transferred or loaned fees will be expended, and, in the case of an interfund loan, the date on which the loan will be repaid and the rate of interest that the account or fund will receive on the loan.

No interfund transfers or loans were made during the fiscal year utilizing these funds. (H) The amount of refunds made pursuant to subdivision (e) Section 66001 and any allocation pursuant to subdivision (f) of Section 66001.

No refunds were made during the fiscal year.

Attachment 20

CITY OF BEAUMONT
ANNUAL COMPLIANCE REPORT FOR AB 1600

POLICE FACILITY FEE
Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2022
For the purpose of compliance with Government Code Subsection 66006(b)(1), the following information regarding AB 1600 fees is presented:

For each separate account or fund established pursuant to subdivision (a), the local agency shall, within 180 days after the last day of each fiscal year, make available to the public the following information for the fiscal year:

(A) A brief description of the type of fee in the account or fund.

Police Facility Fee – The purpose of this fee is to finance additional police facilities to serve future development.

Fee is effective January 22, 2019.

(B) The amount of the fee.

Dev
Units 1
Impact Fee Updated
Per Unit 1 2 01/01/2022 1 2
Residential-Single Family DU $497.60 $573.79 Residential-Multi-Family DU $418.62 $482.71 Residential-Mobile Home DU $462.85 $533.71
Commercial, KSF $110.58 $127.51
Industrial-Business Park KSF $77.41 $ 89.26 Industrial-High-Cube WH KSF $44.23 $51.00 1 Development Units--DU = dwelling unit; KSF = 1,000 gross square feet of building area. 2 Net Impact Fee (Gross $497.60 less 1% Administration portion $4.97).

(C) The beginning and ending balance of the account or fund.

(D) The amount of the fees collected and the interest earned.

Beginning – July 1, 2021 $1,011,812.51
Plus: Fees Collected 514,075.82
Interest 3,672.24
Less: Expenditure (222,860.21)
Refunds (0.00) Ending-June 30, 2022 $1,306,700.36

(E) An identification of each public improvement on which fees were expended and the amount of the expenditures on each improvement, including the total percentage of the cost of the public improvement that was funded with fees No direct expenditures were made for these public improvement during this fiscal year Page 474 of 877

.

(F) An identification of an approximate date by which the construction of the public improvement will commence if the local agency determines that sufficient funds have been collected to complete financing on an incomplete public improvement, as identified in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 66001, and the public improvement remains incomplete.

Funds will be used towards additional police facilities to serve future development.

(G) A description of each interfund transfer or loan made from the account or fund, including the public improvement on which the transferred or loaned fees will be expended, and, in the case of an interfund loan, the date on which the loan will be repaid and the rate of interest that the account or fund will receive on the loan.

PS-01 New Police Station Feasibility Study $89,939.22 PS-04 Public Safety Radio System Upgrade $132,920.99 *The PS-04 project was an accounting error. This amount will show reversed in FY23 as it should have been a different funding source.
(H) The amount of refunds made pursuant to subdivision (e) Section 66001 and any allocation pursuant to subdivision (f) of Section 66001.

No refunds were made during the fiscal year.

Attachment 21

CITY OF BEAUMONT
ANNUAL COMPLIANCE REPORT FOR AB 1600

COMMUNITY PARK DEVELOPMENT FEE
Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2022
For the purpose of compliance with Government Code Subsection 66006(b)(1), the following information regarding AB 1600 fees is presented:

For each separate account or fund established pursuant to subdivision (a), the local agency shall, within 180 days after the last day of each fiscal year, make available to the public the following information for the fiscal year:

(A) A brief description of the type of fee in the account or fund.

Community Park Development Fee – The purpose of this fee is to finance land acquisition and construction of community parks with related amenities.

Fee is effective January 22, 2019.

(B) The amount of the fee.

Dev
Units 1
Impact Fee Updated
Per Unit 1 2 01/01/2022 1 2
Residential-Single Family DU $2,373.32 $2,564.84 Residential-Multi-Family DU $1,996.60 $2,157.72 Residential-Mobile Home DU $2,207.55 $2,385.70 1 Development Units--DU = dwelling unit; KSF = 1,000 gross square feet of building area. 2 Net Impact Fee (Gross $2,373.32 less 1% Administration portion $23.73).

(C) The beginning and ending balance of the account or fund.

(D) The amount of the fees collected and the interest earned.

Beginning – July 1, 2021 $1,177,004.81
Plus: Fees Collected 968,166.08
Interest 4,325.04 Less: Expenditure (20,500.00) Refunds (237,332.00) Ending - June 30, 2022 $1,891,663.93

(E) An identification of each public improvement on which fees were expended and the amount of the expenditures on each improvement, including the total percentage of the cost of the public improvement that was funded with fees

No direct expenditures were made for these public improvement during this fiscal year

.

(F) An identification of an approximate date by which th e construction of the public improvement will commence if the local agency determines that sufficient funds have been collected to complete financing on an incomplete public improvement, as identified in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 66001, and the public improvement remains incomplete.

Funds will be used towards construction of community park improvements.

(G) A description of each interfund transfer or loan made from the account or fund, including the public improvement on which the transferred or loaned fees will be expended, and, in the case of an interfund loan, the date on which the loan will be repaid and the rate of interest that the account or fund will receive on the loan.

P-01 Stewart Park Splash Park $20,500 (H) The amount of refunds made pursuant to subdivision (e) Section 66001 and any allocation pursuant to subdivision (f) of Section 66001.

Refund to Developer due to Park Credit Agreement.

Attachment 22

CITY OF BEAUMONT
ANNUAL COMPLIANCE REPORT FOR AB 1600

NEIGHBORHOOD PARK DEVELOPMENT FEE
Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2022
For the purpose of compliance with Government Code Subsection 66006(b)(1), the following information regarding AB 1600 fees is presented:

For each separate account or fund established pursuant to subdivision (a), the local agency shall, within 180 days after the last day of each fiscal year, make available to the public the following information for the fiscal year:

(A) A brief description of the type of fee in the account or fund.

Neighborhood Park Development Fee – The purpose of this fee is to finance land acquisition and construction of neighborhood parks with related amenities.

Fee is effective January 22, 2019.

(B) The amount of the fee.

Dev
Units 1
Impact Fee Updated
Per Unit 1 2 01/01/2022 1 2
Residential-Single Family DU $2,872.11 $3,103.89 Residential-Multi-Family DU $2,416.22 $2,611.21
Residential-Mobile Home DU $2,671.51 $2,887.10
1 Development Units--DU = dwelling unit; KSF = 1,000 gross square feet of building area. 2 Net Impact Fee (Gross $2,872.11 less 1% Administration portion $28.72).

(C) The beginning and ending balance of the account or fund.

(D) The amount of the fees collected and the interest earned.

Beginning – July 1, 2021 1,545,416.48
Plus: Fees Collected 1,171,643.15
Interest 5,582.24 Transfers In 7,775.80 Less: Expenditure (0.00) Refunds (287,211.00) Ending – June 30, 2022 $2,443,206.67

(E) An identification of each public improvement on which fees were expended and the amount of the expenditures on each improvement, including the total percentage of the cost of the public improvement that was funded with fees

No direct expenditures were made for these public improvement during this fiscal year

.

(F) An identification of an approximate date by which the construction of the public improvement will commence if the local agency determines that sufficient funds have been collected to complete financing on an incomplete public improvement, as identified in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 66001, and the public improvement remains incomplete.

Funds will be used towards construction of neighborhood park improvements.

(G) A description of each interfund transfer or loan made from the account or fund, including the public improvement on which the transferred or loaned fees will be expended, and, in the case of an interfund loan, the date on which the loan will be repaid and the rate of interest that the account or fund will receive on the loan.

No interfund transfers or loans were made during the fiscal year utilizing these funds. (H) The amount of refunds made pursuant to subdivision (e) Section 66001 and any allocation pursuant to subdivision (f) of Section 66001.

Refund to Developer due to Park Credit Agreement.

Staff Report

TO: City Council
FROM: Kari Mendoza, Administrative Services Director
DATE December 20, 2022
SUBJECT: Triennial Performance Audit of the City of Beaumont Transit

Description Beaumont Transit Triennial Performance Audit 2019-2021.

Background and Analysis:

The Transportation Development Act (TDA) of 1971 provides funding to be allocated to transit (and non-transit) related purposes that comply with regional transportation plans.

To ensure program compliance, performance audits are conducted every three years and include performance measures that verify the efficiency and effectiveness of Beaumont Transit services. Performance audits are generally conducted by auditing firms designated by the Regional Transportation Planning Agency (RTPA). In Beaumont’s case, the RTPA is the Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC).

RCTC retained the services of Michael Baker International to conduct the TDA triennial performance audit of the public transit operators under its jurisdiction in Riverside County, including Beaumont Transit, for Fiscal Years 2018-2019 through 2020-2021 (Attachment A).

The performance audit includes a review of the following four areas:

 Compliance with TDA requirements
 Status of prior audit recommendations
 TDA Performance Indicators
 Detailed functional review

Recommendations are then developed to improve the operational efficiency and effectiveness of the transit service.

Triennial Performance Audit Highlights:

Operator Compliance Requirements
The City of Beaumont fully complied with five applicable requirements and partially complied with the remaining three.

Fully Complied

1. CHP Transit Operator Compliance Program
 Vehicles inspected within 13 months prior to each TDA claim with a rating of satisfactory

2. Annual STA and LTF claims for funding submitted to RCTC

3. Annual operating budget did not increase more than 15% over previous year  FY 2019 +1.9%
 FY 2020 +13.6%
 FY 2021 -10.2%

4. Performance Measures are Consistent with Public Utilities Code Section 99247

5. Retirement System is in compliance with Public Utilities Code Section 99271

Partially Complied

1. Farebox Recovery Ratio
System-wide farebox recovery standard partially met (10 Percent Standard)  FY 2019 – 11.68%
 FY 2020 – 7.82%
 FY 2021 – 22.52%
FY 2020 Farebox recovery ratio fell short due to COVID-19

2. Submit Transit Operators Financial Transactions Reports (FTR) on or before January 31st
 FY 19 was submitted March 17th, and FY 20 was submitted February 11th.  FY 21 was submitted on time (January 31st).

3. Submit Annual Fiscal and Compliance Audits within 180 days following the end of the fiscal year (Dec 27th) or has received the appropriate 90-day extension allowed by law.
 FY 2019 was submitted after the 90-day extension period.

Plan of Action:

1. Annual Fiscal and Compliance Audits
 Requesting a 90-day extension from RCTC for FY 2022’s Audit.

2. Financial Transactions Report
 Staff is on track to submit FY 2022’s report by the January 31, 2023, deadline set by SCO.

3. Evaluate and implement route changes to better accommodate riders. This should increase ridership and the farebox recovery ratio.

4. Evaluate potential fare increases due to inflation, as recommended by the 2020 Comprehensive Operations Analysis (COA).

Status of Prior Recommendations (FY 2016-2018 Performance Audit) In this section of the performance audit, the auditor reviews recommendations made in the prior triennial audit and makes conclusions concerning whether the recommendations have been adopted by the agency. During the prior audit period of FY 2016-2018, four recommendations were made to the City, two of which have been implemented:

1. Timely completion and submittal of the FTRs
 Carried forward for full implementation

Plan of Action: Co-ordinate preparation of separate reports for both fixed route service and specialized service with our finance department. This is to include obtaining a new identification number from the SCO for Dial-A-Ride reports, and separating financial, asset and operating data between the transportation modes in their respective SCO reports.

2. Collaborate with RTA and Mt. San Jacinto College on fare revenue reimbursement from the College Go-Pass Revenue Agreement.
 This recommendation has not been implemented and is no longer applicable

Plan of Action: After multiple attempts to reach an agreement and lack of interest from RTA and Mt. San Jacinto College, Beaumont Transit will propose to remove the Go-Pass program from the fare schedule in FY 2023’s Short Range Transit Plan (SRTP).

3. Include a link to Banning Transit on the Beaumont Transit web page.  This recommendation has been implemented.

4. Report mechanical road calls and other vehicle operation metrics in TransTrack Manager software.
 This recommendation has been implemented.

Performance Trends/Indicators
In addition to maintaining the 10% minimum farebox recovery ratio, TDA requires a minimum of five specific performance indicators be reported and met to maintain funding. Included in the audit on pages 18-24 are tables and graphs depicting the trends and indicators of the Beaumont Transit system. It should be noted that the system-wide operating costs and fare revenues are derived from audited data.

Summary of Findings
During the audit period, it is noted that the impacts from the COVID-19 pandemic are reflected in the overall performance. Beaumont Transit systemwide experienced a

67.5% decrease in passengers per service hour. During this time, fixed-route operating costs increased 1.0% and Dial-A-Ride operating costs fell 23.6%. Farebox recovery ratio showed an overall increase in comparison to the previous triennial audit. However, the auditor still recommends that farebox recovery be monitored closely as the ratio has fluctuated above and below the mandated 10% system wide. The auditor also references the 2020 Comprehensive Operations Analysis (COA) which included a 3- phase implementation program to improve performance and increase service.

Detailed Functional Review
The final section of the performance audit reviews the various functions of the transit system including: Operations, maintenance, planning, marketing, general administration and management. A narrative summary can be found on pages 2 7-35 of the audit.

Overall Findings and Recommendations
For this reporting period, four recommendations were given and, as required by RCTC, will be included in the upcoming Short Range Transit Plan, set for adoption in June 2023.

1. Separate the State Controller Transit Operators Financial Transactions Reports into two submittals: Fixed Route and Dial-A-Ride
 Coordinate preparation of separate reports for fixed route service and specialized service with our finance department. This is to include obtaining a new identification number from the SCO for Dial-A-Ride reports, and separating financial, asset and operating data between the transportation modes in their respective SCO reports.

2. Ensure timely completion of external TDA financial reports  Beaumont Transit will request an appropriate 90-day extension in order to wrap up the city-wide audit and submit the required reports within the extension period.

3. Regularly update vehicle fleet in TransTrack
 During the Audit, information pulled from TransTrack included 3 vehicles from other transit agencies. Beaumont has never owned these types of vehicles, and it appears to have been a software issue. We will continue to update TransTrack regularly.

4. Re-engage with riders and collect user input
 Beaumont Transit plans to implement a link to online surveys for passenger input on the Beaumont Transit webpage. In addition, rider surveys will be available to passengers on the buses. Direct input and feedback will help improve service for our passengers.

Conclusion
Riverside County Transportation Commission, acting as the Regional Transportation Planning Agency, will formally review and act on this audit. Should additional information come from that meeting, staff will update City Council at a future meeting.

Fiscal Impact:

This is an informational item with no fiscal impact.

Recommended Action:

Receive and file the Triennial Performance Audit of City of Beaumont Transit .

Attachments:

A. Final Triennial Performance Audit of City of Beaumont Transit

September 2022

2 TABLE OF CONTENTS

Section I ........................................................................................................................................... 1

Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 1

Overview of the Transit System ....................................................................... 1

Section II .......................................................................................................................................... 7

Operator Compliance Requirements .............................................................................................. 7

Section III ....................................................................................................................................... 13

Prior Triennial Performance Recommendations .......................................................................... 13

Section IV ...................................................................................................................................... 17

TDA Performance Indicators ......................................................................................................... 17

Section V ....................................................................................................................................... 27

Review of Operator Functions ...................................................................................................... 27

Operations ............................................................................................................................ 27 Maintenance ......................................................................................................................... 31 Planning................................................................................................................................. 32 Marketing .............................................................................................................................. 32 General Administration and Management ........................................................................... 34

Section VI ...................................................................................................................................... 36

Statement of Facts ........................................................................................................................ 36 Recommendations ........................................................................................................................ 39

Triennial Performance Audit of Beaumont Transit – FYs 2019-2021 Michael Baker International - 1 1
Section I

Introduction

California’s Transportation Development Act (TDA) requires that a triennial performance audit be conducted of public transit entities that receive TDA revenues. The performance audit serves to ensure accountability in the use of public transportation revenue per Public Utilities Code (PUC) 99246.

The Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) engaged Michael Baker International to conduct the TDA triennial performance audit of the public transit operators under its jurisdiction in Riverside County. This performance audit is conducted for the City of Beaumont Transit (Beaumont Transit) covering the most recent triennial period, fiscal years 2018-19 through 2020- 2021.

The purpose of the performance audit is to evaluate Beaumont Transit’s effectiveness and efficiency in its use of TDA funds to provide public transportation in its service area. This evaluation is required as a condition for continued receipt of these funds for public transportation purposes. In addition, the audit evaluates Beaumont Transit’s compliance with the conditions specified in the California Public Utilities Code (PUC). This task involves ascertaining whether the transit agency is meeting the PUC’s reporting requirements. Moreover, the audit includes calculations of transit service performa nce indicators and a detailed review of the transit administrative functions. From the analysis that has been undertaken, a set of recommendations has been made which is intended to improve the performance of transit operations.

In summary, this TDA audit affords the opportunity for an independent, constructive, and objective evaluation of the organization and its operations that otherwise might not be available.

The methodology for the audit included in-person interviews with management, collection and review of agency documents, data analysis, and on-site observations. The Performance Audit Guidebook for Transit Operators and Regional Transportation Planning Entities, published by the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), was used to guide the development and conduct of the audit.

Overview of the Transit System

The City of Beaumont has provided public transportation service since 1975. The current transit system is composed of both fixed-route and Dial-A-Ride services. Fixed-route service began as a single 15-mile route in 1979, after the existing general public Dial-A-Ride service could not meet the growing demand. The fixed route serves the City of Beaumont and the unincorporated community of Cherry Valley to the north. Dial-A-Ride is limited to elderly and Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) certified passengers. A combination of Dial-A-Ride and fixed-route deviations are available to assist passengers who are outside the quarter-mile border of each bus route. In July 2019, the Cities of Banning and Beaumont adopted an interagency service

Triennial Performance Audit of Beaumont Transit – FYs 2019-2021 Michael Baker International - 2 2
agreement, which allows the two transit providers to provide interconnected service through June 30, 2022. This agreement came after the discontinuation of Pass Transit, an initiative that began in 2002 to integrate the two cities’ transit services into one regional service. With the termination of the Pass Transit agreement, Pass Transit branding has been phased out and Beaumont Transit Route 2 service was discontinued in the City of Banning.

Based on the 2020 US Census, Beaumont’s population is 53,036, which grew 43.8 percent since the 2010 US Census. The senior citizen population, composed of residents aged 65 and over, is

13.5 percent. The 2021 population for Beaumont is estimated to be 52,686 as reported by the California Department of Finance, Population Estimates for Cities, Counties, and the State January 1, 2021. The city covers a 30.91-square-mile area.

System Characteristics

Beaumont Transit operates both fixed-route and demand-responsive transit services. During the audit period, the fixed-route system was composed of three commuter/express regional and five local routes. Local routes serve Beaumont, Cherry Valley, and Cabazon, with transfers to Banning Connect routes. The commuter routes provide service between Beaumont and the San Bernardino Metrolink station, Redlands and the Loma Linda VA Hospital, and the Cabazon Outlets and Morongo Resort and Casino. The system operates Monday through Friday from 5:30 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. and Saturdays from 7:30 a.m. to 5:20 p.m. Beaumont Transit does not operate on New Year’s Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day, and Christmas Day. Limited service following a weekend schedule is offered on Martin Luther King Jr.

Day, Presidents’ Day, Columbus Day, Veterans Day, and day after Thanksgiving. Beaumont Transit’s fixed-route services during the audit period are summarized in Table I-1.

Table I-1
Beaumont Transit Fixed Route Services
Route Destination Frequency/Operation Key Time Points
Route 3 Beaumont High –
Walmart
Every 60 minutes
(Monday through Friday
from 6:30 a.m. to 5:25
p.m.)

▪ Beaumont High School
▪ Cougar Way & Beaumont
Avenue
▪ Chatigny Recreation Center
▪ Noble Creek Apartments
▪ Walmart
▪ San Gorgonio Hospital
Route 4

Downtown
Beaumont
Every 60 minutes
(Monday through Friday
from 6:35 a.m. to 6:35
p.m.)

▪ Pennsylvania & 8th Street
▪ Walmart
▪ San Gorgonio Hospital
▪ Three Rings Ranch Park
▪ Beaumont Library
▪ Beaumont Civic Center
▪ Cougar Way @ Beaumont
Avenue
▪ Beaumont High School

Triennial Performance Audit of Beaumont Transit – FYs 2019-2021 Michael Baker International - 3 3
Route Destination Frequency/Operation Key Time Points

Route 3/4
(Saturday Only)
Walmart – Cherry
Valley
Every 60 minutes
(Saturday from 8:00 a.m.
to 5:00 p.m.)

▪ Beaumont High School
▪ Brookside Avenue (Sports
Park)
▪ Chatigny Recreation Center
▪ Pennsylvania & 8th Street
▪ Walmart
▪ San Gorgonio Hospital
▪ Beaumont Civic Center
▪ Cougar Way
Route 7

Tournament Hills
– Fairway Canyon
Two a.m. trips & two p.m.
trips (Monday through
Friday from 6:45 a.m. to
4:50 p.m. when school is
in session)

▪ Oak Valley Parkway & Desert
Lawn
▪ Palmer & Morris
▪ Palmer & Trevino
▪ Champions & Bay Hill
▪ Monte Verde & Morgan
▪ Beaumont High School
▪ Cougar Way @ Beaumont
Avenue
▪ Oak Valley & Rite Aid
Route 9

Seneca Springs –
Cherry Valley
Two a.m. trips & two p.m.
trips (Monday through
Friday from 6:45 a.m. to
4:23 p.m. when school is
in session)

▪ Manzanita Parkway @
Brownie Way
▪ DeForge Park
▪ Walmart
▪ Beaumont Co-Op
▪ Pennsylvania Avenue @ 8th
Street
▪ Cougar Way @ Beaumont
Avenue
▪ Beaumont High School
Commuter Link 120 Beaumont
Walmart – San
Bernardino
Metrolink
Three bidirectional a.m.
trips & three p.m. trips
(Monday through Friday
from 5:30 a.m. to 7:00
p.m.). Two bidirectional
a.m. trips & two p.m.
trips (Saturday from 7:30
a.m. to 5:20 p.m.)

▪ Beaumont Walmart
▪ Beaumont Civic Center
▪ Beaumont Wells Fargo
▪ Cabazon Outlets
▪ Casino Morongo (Saturday
service only)
▪ San Bernardino Metrolink
Commuter Link 125 Beaumont-
Redlands- Loma
Linda VA
Two a.m. trips & two p.m.
trips (Monday through
Friday from 6:30 a.m. to
4:30 p.m.)

▪ Walmart
▪ Beaumont Civic Center
▪ Redlands Transit Center
▪ Loma Linda VA Hospital
▪ Kaiser Redlands Medical
Offices
▪ Beaumont Wells Fargo

Triennial Performance Audit of Beaumont Transit – FYs 2019-2021 Michael Baker International - 4 4
Route Destination Frequency/Operation Key Time Points
Casino Express Beaumont
Walmart – Casino
Morongo
Two a.m. trips & two p.m.
trips (Monday through
Friday from 7:20 a.m. to
4:45 p.m.)

▪ Walmart
▪ Casino Morongo
▪ San Gorgonio Hospital
▪ Cabazon Outlets
Source: Beaumont Transit

Commuter Link 125 was implemented in September 2018 and is the second regional route connecting the Pass Area with San Bernardino County. Commuter Link 125 was designed to provide more direct service to Loma Linda Veterans Administration Hospital, thus enabling Commuter Link 120 to operate more frequencies to the San Bernardino Transit Center. The Casino Express route was implemented in August 2020, providing service to the Morongo Casino and Cabazon Outlets.

In April 2020, Beaumont Transit adjusted service schedules in response to a March 2020 shelter- in-place order resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic. Service changes included combining Routes 3 and 4 and combining Commuter Links 120 and 125.

Dial-A-Ride

Dial-A-Ride offers complementary demand-response door-to-door service in the Beaumont/Cherry Valley area to passengers certified under the ADA and seniors (ages 65 years old and older). ADA certification is conducted through the Riverside Transit Agency (RTA). Dial-A- Ride service operates Monday through Friday from 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. with Saturday and Sunday service offered to ADA-certified persons only from 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. After March 2020, Sunday service on Dial-A-Ride was no longer offered as an impact from the pandemic.

Reservations are required at least 24 hours and up to a month in advance on a first-come, first- served basis. A $2.00 cancellation fee is charged in the event of a no-show or insufficient notice of a cancelled trip.

Fares

Beaumont Transit’s fares are structured based on passenger, route, and service type. Multi-trip passes are also available for purchase. Fare increases were implemented in July 2018 at the beginning of the audit period. That same year, Beaumont Transit began offering mobile ticketing via the Token Transit app. In July 2019, Beaumont increased fares once more for all services except paratransit. The fare structures following the 2019 changes are summarized in Table I-2.

Triennial Performance Audit of Beaumont Transit – FYs 2019-2021 Michael Baker International - 5 5
Table I-2
Beaumont Transit Fixed-Route Fare Schedule
Fare Category Fares
General Public $1.25
Youth (grades K-12) N/A
Seniors (ages 65 and older) $0.75
Persons with Disabilities (ADA or Medicare Card) $0.75
Military Veterans (with photo ID) $0.75
Active Military Free
Go-Pass (during school session only) Free
Child (46” tall or under accompanied by full-fare paying adult) $0.25 Zone Deviations (one way to/from Route 3 and 4) $0.50

Commuter Link & Express – General Public/Go-Pass $3.50
Commuter Link & Express – Youth/Seniors/Disabled/Veterans $2.50

10-Tripper Punch Pass (youth) N/A
10-Ticket Book – General Public $12.50
10-Ticket Book – Seniors/Disabled/Veterans $7.50

Day Pass – General Public $3.10
Day Pass – Youth N/A
Day Pass – Seniors/Disabled/Veterans $1.90

Commuter Link Punch Pass – General Public/Go-Pass $31.50 Commuter Link Punch Pass – Youth $22.50
Commuter Link Punch Pass – Seniors/Disabled/Veterans $22.50

Monthly Pass – General Public $39.00
Monthly Pass – Youth N/A
Monthly Pass – Seniors/Disabled/Veterans $24.80
Source: Beaumont Transit; fares as of July 1, 2019

Active military personnel with proper identification and students holding the Go-Pass can ride free. All jurors summoned to serve in Banning courthouses can ride free on Beaumont Transit Route 2, directly to and from the courthouse, by showing their current and valid juror summons badge to the bus driver.

From October 2020 through October 2021, Beaumont Transit offered fare-free service as part of a Low Carbon Transit Operations Program (LCTOP) Fare Free project.

Triennial Performance Audit of Beaumont Transit – FYs 2019-2021 Michael Baker International - 6 6
Table I-3
Beaumont Transit Dial-A-Ride Fare Schedule
Fare Category Fares
One-Way $2.00
Companion $3.00
Personal Care Attendant (with ID) Free
No-Show (collected during the next ride) $2.00
Child (46” tall or under accompanied by full-fare paying adult) $3.00 10-Ride Punch Card $18.00
Source: Beaumont Transit; fares as of July 1, 2019

Fleet

There were 20 vehicles in the transit fleet during the audit period: 19 fixed-route/commuter and 1 demand-response. Vehicles are wheelchair accessible with tie-downs in compliance with the ADA. Table I-4 summarizes the Beaumont Transit fleet.

Table I-4
Beaumont Transit Fleet
Year Make/Model Quantity Fuel Type Service Mode Seating Capacity
2009 C5500 Starcraft 1 CNG Fixed Route 28 (2 W/C)
2009 GMC 5500 1 CNG Fixed-Route 28 (2 W/C)
2010 C5500 Starcraft 1 CNG Fixed-Route 28 (2 W/C)
2010 Chevy C5500 Starcraft 1 Gasoline Fixed-Route 30 (2 W/C) 2010 Ford E-450 Starcraft 3 Gasoline Fixed-Route 16 (2 W/C) 2011 El Dorado National 3 Gasoline Fixed-Route 30 (2 W/C) 2011 El Dorado National 1 CNG Fixed-Route 30 (2 W/C)
2015 El Dorado National 3 CNG Fixed-Route 43 (2 W/C)
2016 Ford E-450 El Dorado National 1 CNG Demand Response 20 (2 W/C) 2016 Ford F550 El Dorado National 1 CNG Fixed Route 30 (2 W/C) 2018 EZ Rider El Dorado National 1 CNG Fixed Route 30 (2 W/C) 2019 Glaval Entourage 3 CNG Fixed Route 28 (2 W/C)
Total 20
Source: Beaumont Transit

As shown, Beaumont Transit's fleet includes three 16-passenger vehicles with over 300,000 miles each and which have been in service for the past decade. Three new Ford Entourage Type E buses were purchased and delivered in FY 2020-21. A printout of the Beaumont Transit fleet in TransTrack provided to the auditor incorrectly includes three Gillig commuter buses. Beaumont Transit staff verified the incorrect listing and provided the above vehicle list. The TransTrack data should be reviewed and modified to accurately reflect the vehicle fleet.

Triennial Performance Audit of Beaumont Transit – FYs 2019-2021 Michael Baker International - 7 7
Section II

Operator Compliance Requirements

This section of the audit report contains the analysis of Beaumont Transit’s ability to comply with state requirements for continued receipt of TDA funds. The evaluation uses the Caltrans guidebook Performance Audit Guidebook for Transit Operators and Regional Transportation Planning Agencies, September 2008 (third edition) to assess transit operators. The guidebook contains a checklist of 11 measures taken from relevant sections of the PUC and the California Code of Regulations. Each of these requirements is discussed in the table below, including a description of the system’s efforts to comply with the requirements. In addition, the findings from the compliance review are described in the text following the table.

Table II-1
Operator Compliance Requirements Matrix
Operator Compliance
Requirements
Reference Compliance Efforts
The transit operator has
submitted annual reports to the
RTPA based upon the Uniform
System of Accounts and Records
established by the State
Controller. Report is due
within seven (7) months
after the end of the fiscal year
(on or before January 31). The
report shall contain underlying
data from audited financial
statements prepared in
accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles,
if this data is available.

Public Utilities Code,
Section 99243
Completion/submittal dates:

FY 2019: March 17, 2020
FY 2020: February 11, 2021
FY 2021: January 31, 2022

The FY 2019 Transit Operator
Financial Transactions Report was
submitted approximately one
month and a half after the
statutory submittal date. The FY
2020 report was also submitted
slightly beyond the submittal date.

It is also noted that a single Transit
Operators Financial Transaction
Report was prepared by Beaumont
Transit for both fixed route and
Dial-A-Ride for each of the three
audit years. Since Dial-A-Ride has
been designated as a specialized
service for ADA-certified, senior
and disabled passengers, State
Controller instructions require that
separate reports be submitted for
each service type.

Triennial Performance Audit of Beaumont Transit – FYs 2019-2021 Michael Baker International - 8 8
Table II-1
Operator Compliance Requirements Matrix
Operator Compliance
Requirements
Reference Compliance Efforts

Conclusion: Partial Compliance.

The operator has submitted
annual fiscal and compliance
audits to the RTPA and to the
State Controller within 180 days
following the end of the fiscal
year (Dec. 27) or has received
the appropriate 90-day
extension by the RTPA allowed
by law.

Public Utilities Code,
Section 99245
Completion/submittal dates:

FY 2019: May 4, 2020
FY 2020: March 29, 2021
FY 2021: March 4, 2022

Beaumont Transit requested and
was granted a 90-day extension for
the FY 2020 and FY 2021 fiscal and
compliance audit by RCTC as
allowed by law.

The FY 2019 fiscal and compliance
audits was submitted after the 90-
day extension period.

Conclusion: Partial Compliance.

The CHP has, within the 13
months prior to each TDA claim
submitted by an operator,
certified the operator’s
compliance with Vehicle Code
Section 1808.1 following a CHP
inspection of the operator’s
terminal.

Public Utilities Code,
Section 99251 B
Beaumont Transit participates in
the California Highway Patrol (CHP)
Transit Operator Compliance
Program in which the CHP has
conducted inspections within the
13 months prior to each TDA claim.

Inspections were conducted at the
City of Beaumont located at 550
East 6th Street.

Inspection dates applicable to the
audit period were June 4 & 6,
2018; May 20 & 29, 2019; and May
18 & 19, 2020.

Conclusion: Complied.

The operator’s claim for TDA Public Utilities Code, As a condition of approval,

Triennial Performance Audit of Beaumont Transit – FYs 2019-2021 Michael Baker International - 9 9
Table II-1
Operator Compliance Requirements Matrix
Operator Compliance
Requirements
Reference Compliance Efforts
funds is submitted in
compliance with rules and
regulations adopted by the RTPA
for such claims.

Section 99261 Beaumont Transit’s annual claims
for Local Transportation Funds and
State Transit Assistance funds are
submitted in compliance with the
rules and regulations adopted by
RCTC.

Conclusion: Complied.

If an operator serves urbanized
and non-urbanized areas, it has
maintained a ratio of fare
revenues to operating costs at
least equal to the ratio
determined by the rules and
regulations adopted by the
RTPA.

Public Utilities Code,
Section 99270.1
This requirement is not applicable,
as Beaumont Transit only serves a
nonurbanized area.

Note: In the 2020 Census maps,
the City will be in the RIV-SAN UZA
and thus be subject to the 20
percent farebox recovery ratio in
future fiscal audits, and
performance audits.

Conclusion: Not Applicable.

The operator’s operating budget
has not increased by more than
15% over the preceding year,
nor is there a substantial
increase or decrease in the
scope of operations or capital
budget provisions for major new
fixed facilities unless the
operator has reasonably
supported and substantiated the
change(s).

Public Utilities Code,
Section 99266
Percentage change in Beaumont
Transit’s operating budget:

FY 2019: +1.9%
FY 2020: +13.6%
FY 2021: -10.2%

Source: City of Beaumont Annual
Budgets for FYs 2019-2021.

Conclusion: Complied.

The operator’s definitions of
performance measures are
consistent with Public Utilities
Code Section 99247, including
(a) operating cost, (b) operating
cost per passenger, (c) operating
Public Utilities Code,
Section 99247
The Beaumont Transit’s definition
of performance is consistent with
PUC Section 99247. A review of
trip sheets generated during the
audit period indicates that correct
performance data are being

Triennial Performance Audit of Beaumont Transit – FYs 2019-2021 Michael Baker International - 10 10
Table II-1
Operator Compliance Requirements Matrix
Operator Compliance
Requirements
Reference Compliance Efforts
cost per vehicle service hour,
(d) passengers per vehicle
service hour, (e) passengers per
vehicle service mile, (f) total
passengers, (g) transit vehicle,
(h) vehicle service hours, (i)
vehicle service miles, and (j)
vehicle service hours per
employee.

collected.

Conclusion: Complied.

If the operator serves an
urbanized area, it has
maintained a ratio of fare
revenues to operating costs at
least equal to one-fifth (20
percent), unless it is in a county
with a population of less than
500,000, in which case it must
maintain a ratio of fare revenues
to operating costs of at least
equal to three-twentieths (15
percent), if so determined by
the RTPA.

Public Utilities Code,
Sections 99268.2,
99268.3, 99268.12,
99270.1
This requirement is not applicable,
as Beaumont Transit only serves a
nonurbanized area.

Conclusion: Not Applicable.

If the operator serves a rural
area, or provides exclusive
services to elderly and disabled
persons, it has maintained a
ratio of fare revenues to
operating costs at least equal to
one-tenth (10 percent).

Public Utilities Code,
Sections 99268.2,
99268.4, 99268.5
Operating ratios for Beaumont
Transit using audited data were as
follows:

FY 2019: 11.68%
FY 2020: 7.82%
FY 2021: 22.52%

Audited farebox ratio accounts for
local support revenue and
exclusion of new or expanded
service. Beaumont Transit is
subject to a system-wide farebox
standard of 10 percent. The system
did not meet the minimum farebox
ratio in FY 2020.

Triennial Performance Audit of Beaumont Transit – FYs 2019-2021 Michael Baker International - 11 11
Table II-1
Operator Compliance Requirements Matrix
Operator Compliance
Requirements
Reference Compliance Efforts

Source: City of Beaumont Transit
System Financial Statements
(audited).

Conclusion: Partial Compliance.

The current cost of the
operator’s retirement system is
fully funded with respect to the
officers and employees of its
public transportation system, or
the operator is implementing a
plan approved by the RTPA
which will fully fund the
retirement system within 40
years.

Public Utilities Code,
Section 99271
To be eligible for TDA funds, the
annual TDA claims form requires a
sign-off from the transit claimant
to comply with standard
assurances, one of which is that
the City of Beaumont’s retirement
system is funded.

City staff’s retirement is funded
through the California Public
Employees’ Retirement System.

Conclusion: Complied.

If the operator receives state
transit assistance funds, the
operator makes full use of funds
available to it under the Urban
Mass Transportation Act of 1964
before TDA claims are granted.

California Code of
Regulations, Section
6754(a)(3)
As a recipient of State Transit
Assistance funds, Beaumont
Transit does not utilize federal
funds (other than those funds that
are passed through RCTC).

Conclusion: Not Applicable.

Triennial Performance Audit of Beaumont Transit – FYs 2019-2021 Michael Baker International - 12 12
Findings and Observations from Operator Compliance Requirements Matrix

1. Of the compliance requirements pertaining to Beaumont Transit, the operator fully complied with five out of the eight applicable requirements. Beaumont Transit was in partial compliance with regard to the timely completion and submittal of its Transit Operator Financial Transactions Report to the State Controller, annual fiscal and compliance audits, and farebox recovery attainment. Three additional compliance requirements did not apply to the operator (intermediate and urban farebox recovery ratio and the use of federal funds).

2. Based on the farebox calculation in the annual Transit System Financial Statements (audited), Beaumont’s farebox recovery ratio met or exceeded the required minimum standard of 10 percent in two of the three audit years. The system-wide farebox recovery ratios were 11.68 percent in FY 2019, 7.82 percent in FY 2020, and 22.52 percent in FY 2021.1 It is noted that the audited farebox ratio in FY 2020 was adversely impacted from the COVID-19 pandemic and state shelter-in-place order as well as the suspension of fare collection. Beaumont Transit utilized an allowable combination of additional local support revenues plus exclusion of new services costs in order to meet minimum farebox recovery attainment in FY 2021.

3. Beaumont Transit participates in the CHP Transit Operator Compliance Program in which the CHP conducted inspections within the 13 months prior to each TDA claim. The CHP inspection reports submitted for review were found to be satisfactory.

4. The annual operating budget did not increase above 15 percent but did exhibit fluctuations during the audit period due to COVID-19 pandemic impacts. Beaumont saw increases of 1.9 percent and 13.6 percent, respectively, during FY 2019 and FY 2020. The budget exhibited a decrease of 10.2 percent in FY 2021. The FY 2020 budgetary increase is attributed to higher salaries and fringe benefits.

1 AB 90, passed into law and signed by the governor in June 2020 in response to the COVID-19 pandemic impacts, prohibits the imposition of penalties on a transit operator that does not maintain the required ratio of fare revenues to operating cost during FY 2019–20 or FY 2020–21.

Triennial Performance Audit of Beaumont Transit – FYs 2019-2021 Michael Baker International - 13 13

Section III

Prior Triennial Performance Recommendations

Beaumont Transit’s efforts to implement the recommendations made in the FY 2016-2018 triennial performance audit are examined in this section of the report. For this purpose, each prior recommendation for the agency is described, followed by a discussion of Beaumont Transit’s efforts to implement the recommendation. Conclusions concerning the extent to which the recommendations have been adopted by the agency are then presented.

Prior Recommendation 1

Prepare and submit separate State Controller Transit Operators Financial Transactions Reports for general public transit and specialized service.

Background: This recommendation is carried over from the prior performance audit. Beaumont’s annual Transit Operators Financial Transactions Report to the State Controller has historically combined information for both general public (fixed route/commuter) and specialized service for seniors and persons with disabilities (ADA-certified and noncertified). Although the State Controller’s Office has not provided notice to the City, written instructions by the state to prepare this particular report require separate reporting of these modes. In the General Instruction Form completed by Beaumont Transit, a selection must be made as to which mode of transit is represented in the report. The options are general public use or elderly/disabled.

The Transit Operators Financial Transactions Report instructions contain the following passages under the General Instruction Form:

Transit operators providing two types of service, (general public use and transit service exclusively for the elderly/handicapped) must complete a separate report for each type of service.

… a separate report must be filed for each type of service provided: General Public Use Service or Specialized Service exclusive for elderly and/or handicapped. For example, if an agency has received Article 4 and Article 8(c) monies to provide General Public Use Service, the agency should submit one report. If that agency has also received Article 4 monies to provide Specialized Service for the elderly and/or handicapped, then a report must be submitted for the Specialized Service operations.

The submission of separate reports to the State Controller will further demonstrate Beaumont’s proactive approach to compliance with state reporting instructions.

Triennial Performance Audit of Beaumont Transit – FYs 2019-2021 Michael Baker International - 14 14
Actions taken by Beaumont Transit

A review of the Transit Operators Financial Transactions Reports completed and submitted by the City to the State Controller revealed that Beaumont Transit has continued its practice of including information for both general public (Pass Transit fixed route) and specialized service for seniors and persons with disabilities (ADA-certified and noncertified) in the same report. Since Beaumont Dial-a-Ride is considered a specialized service for ADA-certified and seniors, the City would still need to complete the report entitled “Transit Operators Financial Transactions – Specialized Service.”

Conclusion

This recommendation has not been implemented and is carried forward for full implementation.

Beaumont Transit should coordinate preparation of separate reports with the City Finance Department to complete separate financial reporting of general public and specialized services.

This will include obtaining a new identification number for Dial-A-Ride reports from the State Controller’s Office, and separating financial, asset, and operating data between the two modes in their respective SCO reports.

Prior Recommendation 2

Continue to work with RTA and Mt. San Jacinto College on fare revenue reimbursement from the College Go-Pass Revenue Agreement.

Background: Beaumont Transit had taken steps to reach a fare revenue reimbursement agreement with Mt. San Jacinto College. In the meantime, Beaumont Transit had continued to honor RTA’s Go-Pass without an agreement in place. Under the Go-Pass program, Mt. San Jacinto College students get unlimited rides on RTA buses. Beaumont Transit was anticipating that the Mt. San Jacinto College student body would vote on the separate fare revenue agreement in early 2018; however, the vote never materialized. It was recommended that Beaumont Transit continue to work with the college and RTA on having such an agreement in place as a farebox enhancement measure.

Actions taken by the Beaumont Transit

Beaumont Transit approached and met with representatives of Mt. San Jacinto College and RTA about executing a fare revenue agreement that would benefit Beaumont Transit. The parties were not able to come to an agreement due to a lack of interest on the part of the college and RTA. Beaumont Transit will propose in the FY 2023 Short-Range Transit Plan to remove the Go- Pass program from the fare schedule.

Triennial Performance Audit of Beaumont Transit – FYs 2019-2021 Michael Baker International - 15 15
Conclusion

This recommendation has not been implemented and is no longer applicable due to inability to secure a fare revenue agreement.

Prior Recommendation 3

Include a link to Banning Transit on the Beaumont Transit web page.

Background: The Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) or cooperative services agreement between the Cities of Banning and Beaumont that has been in effect since December 2002 was terminated during the audit period and involved phasing out the Pass Transit brand and the removal of Beaumont Transit Route 2 from operating within the City of Banning. In its place, an interagency service agreement between the two cities was adopted in July 2019, which provides continued cooperation of both cities in “providing the public with specific transit information, advertising the operations of both agencies and promoting the general use of transit.” Pursuant to the interagency service agreement with the City of Banning, it was recommended that Beaumont include a link to Banning Connect on its transit page.

Actions taken by Beaumont Transit

Beaumont Transit’s website and transit page ( https://www.beaumontca.gov/90/Transit) were updated during the audit period. Included on the updated transit webpage are regional service provider links to Banning Connect as well as RTA, SunLine Transit Agency, OmniTrans, MetroLink, and IE511 agency websites.

Conclusion

This recommendation has been implemented.

Prior Recommendation 4

Report mechanical road calls and other vehicle operation metrics in TransTrack Manager.

Background: The Transit Division indicated that system road calls were not being regularly tracked. A mechanical failure of a bus in revenue service that causes a delay to service, and which necessitates removing the bus from service until repairs are made, can impact overall system performance. Transit performance data are routinely entered into TransTrack for trends analysis across the different service modes. TransTrack features modules that track customer service complaints, Dial-A-Ride no-shows, accidents, and mechanical road calls. The recent implementation of the Dossier fleet maintenance software and Zonar should allow for road call data to be downloaded or migrated into TransTrack. It was recommended that the Transit Division start reporting road call data in TransTrack.

Triennial Performance Audit of Beaumont Transit – FYs 2019-2021 Michael Baker International - 16 16
Actions taken by Beaumont Transit

Beaumont Transit has been tracking system road calls on an Excel spreadsheet, which was provided for the purposes of this performance audit. The road calls are categorized according to the National Transit Database definitions. Commencing in FY 2021, Beaumont started to report mechanical road calls in TransTrack Manager.

Conclusion

This recommendation has been implemented.

Triennial Performance Audit of Beaumont Transit – FYs 2019-2021 Michael Baker International - 17 17
Section IV

TDA Performance Indicators

This section reviews Beaumont Transit’s performance in providing transit service to the community in an efficient and effective manner. The TDA requires that at least five specific performance indicators be reported, which are contained in the following tables. Farebox recovery ratio is not one of the five specific indicators but is a requirement for continued TDA funding. Therefore, farebox calculation is also included. Two additional performance indicators that gauge service effectiveness and revenue, operating cost per mile and average fare per passenger, are included as well. Findings from the analysis are contained in the section following the tables.

Tables IV-1 through IV-3 provide the performance indicators for Beaumont Transit system-wide, fixed route, and Dial-A-Ride. Charts are also provided to depict the trends in the indicators. It is noted that the system-wide operating costs and fare revenues are based on audited data. Total operating costs and fare revenues are shown in the tables and include the exempted services (e.g., new or extended services) to illustrate overall expenses and revenue for the transit system.

The exempted services are then excluded from expenses and revenue to generate the farebox recovery ratios as allowed by the TDA and shown in the audit figures.

Triennial Performance Audit of Beaumont Transit – FYs 2019-2021 Michael Baker International - 18 18
Table IV-1
Beaumont Transit TDA Performance Indicators
System-wide
Audit Period
Performance Data and Indicators FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 % Change FY
2018-2021
Operating Cost (less depreciation)(1) $2,679,451 $2,846,002 $2,701,869 $2,646,509 -1.2% Adjusted Operating Costs (less depreciation &
exclusions)(1) $2,221,266 $2,302,689 $1,508,389 $1,290,883 -41.9% Total Passengers 197,775 197,775 108,169 39,213 -80.2%
Vehicle Service Hours 24,791 24,771 18,437 15,106 -39.1% Vehicle Service Miles 413,009 413,009 392,585 336,542 -18.5% Employee FTEs 24 24 26 24 0.0%
Total Passenger Fares $234,182 $184,282 $174,542 $18,116 -92.3% Passenger Fare Exclusions (new/extended
services) $32,371 $49,675 $58,940 $9,394 -71.0%
Other Fare Revenue Contributions $0 $134,444 $2,288 $281,999 Total Fare Revenue with exclusions $201,811 $269,051 $117,890 $290,721 44.1%

Operating Cost per Passenger(2) $13.55 $14.39 $24.98 $67.49 398.2% Operating Cost per Vehicle Service Hour(2) $108.08 $114.89 $146.55 $175.20 62.1% Operating Cost per Vehicle Service Mile(2) $6.49 $6.89 $6.88 $7.86 21.2% Passengers per Vehicle Service Hour 8.0 8.0 5.9 2.6 -67.5% Passengers per Vehicle Service Mile 0.48 0.48 0.28 0.12 -75.7% Vehicle Service Hours per Employee 1,033.0 1,032.1 709.1 629.4 -39.1% Average Fare per Passenger $1.18 $0.93 $1.61 $0.46 -61.0% Farebox Recovery Ratio (passenger fares only)(2) 8.74% 6.48% 6.46% 0.68% -92.2% Adjusted Farebox Recovery Ratio (adjusted
operating costs & other fare revenue
contributions)(3) 9.09% 11.68% 7.82% 22.52% 147.9%

Consumer Price Index - (CPI-All) (4) 3.5% 3.4% 2.5% 2.0% 8.1% Source: City of Beaumont Transit System Basic Financial Statements (audited); Transit Operator Financial Transactions Report (1) System-wide operating costs are as shown in Basic Financial Statements. Modal operational costs in subsequent tables are noted in Beaumont Transit System internal financial reports. Modal operational costs do not sum to operational costs due to differing data sources.
(2) Calculation uses operating costs less depreciation. (3) Calculation uses adjusted operational costs, per the audited financial statements. (4) Percentage change in the three-year CPI is based on the difference between the FY 2021 price index and FY 2018 price index. The annual CPI is the change in the price index from the prior year.

Triennial Performance Audit of Beaumont Transit – FYs 2019-2021 Michael Baker International - 19 19
Table IV-2
Beaumont Transit TDA Performance Indicators
Fixed Route
Audit Period
Performance Data and Indicators FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 % Change FY
2018-2021
Operating Cost(1) $2,438,004 $2,630,095 $2,457,439 $2,462,029 1.0% Total Passengers 187,489 187,489 102,349 37,130 -80.2%
Vehicle Service Hours 21,605 21,605 16,621 14,453 -33.1% Vehicle Service Miles 380,714 380,714 369,039 322,449 -15.3% Employee FTEs 22 22 24 22 0.0%
Passenger Fares $219,496 $164,121 $162,239 $12,373 -94.4%

Operating Cost per Passenger(2) $13.00 $14.03 $24.01 $66.31 409.9% Operating Cost per Vehicle Service Hour(2) $112.84 $121.74 $147.85 $170.35 51.0% Operating Cost per Vehicle Service Mile(2) $6.40 $6.91 $6.66 $7.64 19.2% Passengers per Vehicle Service Hour 8.7 8.7 6.2 2.6 -70.4% Passengers per Vehicle Service Mile 0.49 0.49 0.28 0.12 -76.6% Vehicle Service Hours per Employee 982.0 982.0 692.5 657.0 -33.1% Average Fare per Passenger $1.17 $0.88 $1.59 $0.33 -71.5% Farebox Recovery Ratio (Total Fixed Route
Mode Only)(2) 9.00% 6.24% 6.60% 0.50% -94.4%

Consumer Price Index - (CPI-All) 3.5% 3.4% 2.5% 2.0% 8.1% Source: City of Beaumont Transit System Financial Statements (audited); Transit Operator Financial Transactions; Beaumont Transit System Internal Financial Reports
(1) Modal operational costs are as noted in Beaumont Transit System internal financial reports. Modal operational costs do not sum to operational costs due to differing data sources. (2) Calculation uses modal operational cost.

Triennial Performance Audit of Beaumont Transit – FYs 2019-2021 Michael Baker International - 20 20
Table IV-3
Beaumont Transit TDA Performance Indicators
Dial-A-Ride
Audit Period
Performance Data and Indicators FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 % Change FY
2018-2021
Operating Cost(1) $241,447 $215,907 $244,431 $184,480 -23.6% Total Passengers 10,286 10,286 5,820 2,083 -79.7%
Vehicle Service Hours 3,186 3,166 1,816 653 -79.5%
Vehicle Service Miles 32,295 32,295 23,546 14,093 -56.4% Employee FTEs 2 2 2 2 0.0%
Passenger Fares $14,686 $20,161 $12,303 $5,743 -60.9%

Operating Cost per Passenger(2) $23.47 $20.99 $42.00 $88.56 277.3% Operating Cost per Vehicle Service Hour(2) $75.78 $68.20 $134.60 $282.51 272.8% Operating Cost per Vehicle Service Mile(2) $7.48 $6.69 $10.38 $13.09 75.1% Passengers per Vehicle Service Hour 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 -1.2% Passengers per Vehicle Service Mile 0.32 0.32 0.25 0.15 -53.6% Vehicle Service Hours per Employee 1,593.0 1,583.0 908.0 326.5 -79.5% Average Fare per Passenger $1.43 $1.96 $2.11 $2.76 93.1% Farebox Recovery Ratio(2) 6.08% 9.34% 5.03% 3.11% -48.8%

Consumer Price Index - (CPI-All) 3.5% 3.4% 2.5% 2.0% 8.1% Source: City of Beaumont Transit System Financial Statements (audited); Transit Operator Financial Transactions; Beaumont Transit System Internal Financial Reports
(1) Modal operational costs are as noted in Beaumont Transit System internal financial reports. Modal operational costs do not sum to operational costs due to differing data sources. (2) Calculation uses modal operational cost.

Triennial Performance Audit of Beaumont Transit – FYs 2019-2021 Michael Baker International - 21 21
Graph IV-1
Operating Costs (less depreciation, without exemptions) System-wide, Fixed Route, and Dial-A-Ride

Graph IV-2
Ridership
System-wide, Fixed Route, and Dial-A-Ride

Triennial Performance Audit of Beaumont Transit – FYs 2019-2021 Michael Baker International - 22 22
Graph IV-3
Operating Cost per Passenger
System-wide, Fixed Route, and Dial-A-Ride

Graph IV-4
Operating Cost per Vehicle Service Hour
System-wide, Fixed Route, and Dial-A-Ride

Triennial Performance Audit of Beaumont Transit – FYs 2019-2021 Michael Baker International - 23 23
Graph IV-5
Passengers per Vehicle Service Hour
System-wide, Fixed Route, and Dial-A-Ride

Graph IV-6
Fare Recovery Ratio (passenger fares & operating costs, less depreciation) System-wide, Fixed Route, and Dial-A-Ride

Triennial Performance Audit of Beaumont Transit – FYs 2019-2021 Michael Baker International - 24 24
Graph IV-7
Adjusted Fare Recovery Ratio (adjusted operating costs & other fare revenue contributions ) System-wide

Triennial Performance Audit of Beaumont Transit – FYs 2019-2021 Michael Baker International - 25 25

Findings from Verification of TDA Performance Indicators

It is noted that adverse impacts on transit service from the COVID-19 pandemic and statewide shelter-in-place order are reflected in various performance measure trends described below. The operator’s response during this period is contained in the functional review section of this audit.

1. Operating cost per vehicle service hour, an indicator of cost efficiency, increased 62.1 percent system-wide from $108.08 in the FY 2018 base year to $175.20 in FY 2021. System- wide operating costs (based on audited data) decreased 1.2 percent during the period, while vehicle service hours decreased by 39.1 percent. The average annual decrease in operating costs was 0.3 percent.

2. Operating cost per passenger, an indicator of cost effectiveness, increased 398.2 percent system-wide from $13.55 in FY 2018 to $67.49 in FY 2021. Ridership system-wide decreased

80.2 percent during the review period from 197,775 passengers in FY 2018 to 39,213 passengers in FY 2021, while operating costs decreased by 1.2 percent over the same period.

3. Passengers per vehicle service hour, which measures the effectiveness of the service delivered, decreased 67.5 percent between FY 2018 and FY 2021 system-wide from 8 to 2.6 passengers per hour. Fixed-route operations were consistent with this trend, with a decrease of 70.4 percent over the same period from 8.7 to 2.6 passengers per hour. In contrast, Dial-A- Ride operations exhibited a lesser decrease of 1.2 percent from 3.23 to 3.19 passengers per hour. The trend in this indicator demonstrates a significant decline in passenger trips as compared to the decline in vehicle service hours.

4. Passengers per vehicle service mile, another indicator of service effectiveness, decreased

75.7 percent between FY 2018 and FY 2021 system-wide from 0.48 to 0.12 passengers per mile. For fixed-route operations, the number of passengers per service mile decreased by

76.6 percent from 0.49 to 0.12. Passengers per service mile on Dial-A-Ride decreased by 53.6 percent during the same period, from 0.32 in FY 2018 to 0.15 in FY 2021. From the FY 2018 base year to FY 2021, actual vehicle service miles decreased 18.5 percent system-wide.

5. Vehicle service hours per employee decreased 39.1 percent system-wide between FY 2018 and FY 2021. This decrease was associated with a net decrease in vehicle service hours for both fixed-route and Dial-A-Ride services, and net employee full-time equivalents (FTE) remaining constant over the audit period. This measure is based on the number of employee FTEs using employee pay hours from the State Controller Report and dividing by 2,000 hours per employee.

6. Farebox recovery calculated, taking into consideration passenger fares, fare exclusions, and adjusted operating costs, less depreciation and exclusions, exhibited an overall increase of 147.9 percent system-wide between FY 2018 and FY 2021 from 9.09 percent to 22.52 percent. System-wide, passenger fare revenues decreased 92.3 percent based on audited

Triennial Performance Audit of Beaumont Transit – FYs 2019-2021 Michael Baker International - 26 26
data while operating costs, less depreciation, decreased 1.2 percent. Adjusted operating costs, less depreciation and exclusions, decreased 41.9 percent, indicating that route exclusions increased over the audit period. Other fare contributions also increased substantially over the audit period, yielding an over 44.1 percent increase to total fare revenues system-wide. At a modal level, fixed-route farebox recovery decreased 94.4 percent whereas Dial-A-Ride farebox recovery decreased 48.8 percent.

Conclusion from the Verification of TDA Performance Indicators

Despite the introduction of new and expanded services along with the associated increases in vehicle service hours and miles, ridership has decreased across both service modes. FY 2019-20 was the first year that Pass Transit split up into Banning Connect and Beaumont Transit, which essentially eliminated Beaumont’s ability to effectively get passengers to social service locations in Banning without transfers. The COVID-19 pandemic and statewide shelter-in-place order starting in March 2020 further contributed to the performance decline including suspension of fare collection.

After an increase in demand over the prior audit period, passenger trips exhibited an annual decline of 36.4 percent from the FY 2018 base year to FY 2021. The decline on fixed route mirrored the system-wide percentage. On the other hand, average annual decreases in Dial-A- Ride ridership averaged a comparable 35.9 percent. Fixed-route operating costs grew 1.0 percent during the reporting period while Dial-A-Ride operating costs decreased 23.6 percent.

The modal changes in cost do not include exclusions for new routes or expanded services.

Vehicle service hours decreased overall by 39.1 percent and vehicle service miles decreased by

18.5 percent.

Farebox recovery should be monitored closely as the audited ratios with exclusions have hovered or dipped below the minimum standard of 10 percent system-wide. To aid the farebox with local revenue support, in FY 2020, Beaumont purchased a 6.14-acre parcel in the City's southwest industrial area, in partnership with the Wastewater Fund. This property includes a 28,000-square-foot public fueling station for compressed natural gas vehicles, which serves as a critical revenue source for Beaumont Transit's farebox recovery. In addition, Beaumont Transit completed a Comprehensive Operational Analysis (COA) in November 2020, which contained a three-phase implementation program to improve on-time performance and increase service into areas of growth.

Triennial Performance Audit of Beaumont Transit – FYs 2019-2021 Michael Baker International - 27 27

Section V

Review of Operator Functions

This section provides an in-depth review of various functions in the Beaumont Transit System.

The review highlights accomplishments, issues, and/or challenges that were determined during the audit period. The following functions were reviewed at the City of Beaumont:

• Operations
• Maintenance
• Planning
• Marketing
• General Administration and Management

Within some departments are subfunctions that require review as well, such as Grants Administration that falls under General Administration.

Operations

Beaumont Transit has continued to expand and harmonize its transit system to meet the growing area population and service demand from commuters and students. The system was able to sustain basic service despite the COVID-19 pandemic impacts. Routes operate on hourly headways, but as more residents and economic development move into the area, Beaumont Transit sees the potential for implementation of new routes and amenities in the future.

An interagency services agreement was adopted between the Cities of Beaumont and Banning in July 2019. The new agreement allows for interline transfers between the two systems at the Walmart in Beaumont and the San Gorgonio Memorial Hospital in Banning. Beaumont limits Banning to no more than three buses per hour at Walmart and Banning will limit Beaumont to no more than three buses per hour at the San Gorgonio Memorial Hospital bus stop.

Route 3 has grown to be one of the busiest routes in the system due to the new subdivisions and requests for service in Cherry Valley. Tripper service was added to Route 3 to service Beaumont High School and Cherry Valley. Route 4 was realigned to run in an east–west orientation, while Route 9 was implemented in response to the high student ridership in southern Beaumont. A deviation was built into Route 4 to serve the Amazon Fulfillment Center located at 1010 West 4th Street. Beaumont Transit also placed a bus stop at the Amazon facility.

Routes 7 and 9 operate the morning and afternoon peak hours when school is in session. Route 3/4 combines Routes 3 and 4 and operates hourly headway service on Saturday and limited

Triennial Performance Audit of Beaumont Transit – FYs 2019-2021 Michael Baker International - 28 28
service on holidays. More than 50 percent of the local fixed-route ridership is composed of students. Beaumont Transit also interlines with RTA, Banning Connect, and SunLine routes at Walmart, which serves as the main transit hub for the system.

At the request of the City of Calimesa and RTA, Beaumont Transit implemented Route 136 to Calimesa in FY 2017. The route was designed with one-hour headways and an alternative route during peak morning afternoon hours to serve local students attending the Yucaipa School District. The route only comprised 1 percent of system-wide trips and was eventually discontinued due to low ridership in its third year of service (FY 2019).

A second commuter route, Commuter Link 125, was implemented in September 2018 to provide service to the Loma Linda Veterans Administration Hospital and Kaiser in Redlands. Commuter Link Route 120, which was implemented in 2013, was realigned to provide more direct service to the San Bernardino Transit Center. This has allowed for better coordination and interline connections with Omnitrans pursuant to an interagency agreement.

In its capacity as an emergency service provider, Beaumont Transit was dispatched to evacuate mobile home communities impacted by the Apple Fire that burned through the Cherry Valley area north of Beaumont in the summer of 2020. An evacuation center was established at Beaumont High School.

Passenger amenities include refurbished bus shelters at the Walmart transit hub. The shelters are larger with lean bars installed. Beaumont Transit has applied for LCTOP funding to make improvements at three busy bus stop locations and for a free fare promotion. Vehicles operated on the commuter routes are equipped with USB ports and luggage racks. Beaumont Transit also received delivery of two electric buses outfitted with a distinctive wrap containing a green stripe and electric bolt livery. Beaumont Transit is looking to procure two EZ Rider buses for the commuter routes.

Transit operations are administered by the Community Services Department from Building D at the Beaumont Civic Center Complex from the Fleet Maintenance facility at 550 North California Avenue. A surveillance camera system was installed with 24-hour monitoring of the bus yard by the Police Department.

The City’s Transit Division is looking to consolidate its administration, operations, and fleet maintenance functions on a parcel that the City has acquired in an industrial area of town at the intersection of West 4th Street and Veile Avenue. The facility would also feature a CNG fueling station open to the general public with plans to include an electric vehicle charging station in order to meet the state’s zero-emission vehicle mandates.

Beaumont Transit has seen an increased number of disabled and wheelchair-bound passengers.

Delivery of newer electric vehicles to replace aging ones will be able to accommodate three wheelchairs each. In response to a prior audit recommendation, Beaumont Transit reformatted

Triennial Performance Audit of Beaumont Transit – FYs 2019-2021 Michael Baker International - 29 29
its trip sheets to account for the number of wheelchair-bound and disabled passengers, given the higher demand.

All buses are equipped with five surveillance cameras and Motorola radio systems. The radio system was upgraded as part of an overall upgrade to the City’s communication system spearheaded by the City Police Department. The upgrade to a five-channel trunked 800- megahertz system has allowed the Beaumont Police and other City departments to be on the same frequency with other county, state, and federal public safety agencies in the event of a major emergency. In addition, the new radio system has allowed for better reception in more remote areas of the service area.

Dial-A-Ride serves Beaumont and the unincorporated community of Cherry Valley with service provided on Sunday for ADA-certified passengers. Three peak vehicles are used for Dial-A-Ride.

ADA-certified passengers have priority over other eligible riders on Dial-A-Ride, including seniors, when the service accepts both ADA and non-ADA riders. Beaumont Transit uses a self- certification process with professional verification and accepts ADA certification by the RTA. This allows Beaumont to work under the umbrella of RTA’s ADA policy as a provider of ADA paratransit. There have been no ADA denials reported. Also, according to the City’s website, Beaumont Transit charges a cancellation fee if inadequate notice to cancel is given by the passenger.

Beaumont utilizes DoubleMap commuter-aided dispatching with an automatic vehicle locator feature for its fixed and Commuter Link routes. DoubleMap provides real-time bus data which are utilized to track on-time performance. On-time performance has averaged 92 percent for fixed-route and commuter services.

Trip Master software is used to schedule Dial-A-Ride trips, generating manifests and tracking no- shows. The Trip Master software contains a module that allows for electronic prepayment of fares. Prior to the adoption of Trip Master, Beaumont Transit utilized Schedule VIEW and Excel spreadsheets for trip scheduling. Driver trip sheets for both service modes include sections for recording the passenger count and fare categories, fuel mileage, revenue hours and miles, and yard hours and miles. The yard hours and miles include deadhead hours and mileage. Drivers also use Samsung-branded tablets to assist with routing and communications with dispatch.

Vehicles are equipped with Diamond vaulted fareboxes. At the end of each shift, drivers pull out the vaults but do not handle the revenues. The vaults automatically shut and lock upon removal.

The vaults are then placed into a locker and are removed for counting the following day by two Transit Division employees and reconciled with the trip sheets. The count is entered into a computer system and the revenues are sealed for deposit. The Finance Department receives a copy of the deposit record and matches it up with the deposit slip for comparison.

Beaumont Transit implemented the Token Transit mobile ticketing platform for online pass and ticket purchases at the beginning of FY 2019. Token Transit receives a 10 percent commission on fares in excess of $2.00 per trip. For all other transactions under $2.00, the fee is $0.06 plus 7

Triennial Performance Audit of Beaumont Transit – FYs 2019-2021 Michael Baker International - 30 30
percent of the purchase. In addition, Beaumont phased out punch card passes, which were used by students.

COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts

As impacts from the novel coronavirus started to be realized in California, a state of emergency was declared on March 4, 2020. Subsequently, a mandatory statewide shelter-in-place order was implemented on March 19 of the same year. In response, Beaumont Transit implemented measures and protocols to mitigate the spread of the virus. Fare collection was suspended in March 2020. Beaumont Transit installed driver barriers, enforced mandated masking protocols, and implemented enhanced cleaning measures.

During the pandemic, Route 3/4, which generally operates Saturdays, was expanded to operate Monday through Saturday; Commuter Routes 120 and 125 were combined; and Route 2 was eventually eliminated. In addition, office personnel began working from home and drivers were given an opportunity to continue working by doing other tasks since certain routes were suspended. This included shifting some drivers temporarily to assist other City departments, like Parks and Recreation, during transit downtimes. These necessary activities in response to the rapidly evolving COVID-19 pandemic condition resulted in severe impacts on performance trends, which were pervasive throughout the transit industry during the fourth quarter of FY 2020 and most of FY 2021. Fare collection resumed on all service modes effective October 2021.

Personnel

Beaumont Transit personnel are City employees. The Transit Division is composed of a part-time transit director, part-time assistant director, half-time management analyst, operations manager/scheduler, dispatcher, vehicle maintenance supervisor, 12 full-time equivalent drivers, and 4 full-time equivalent mechanics.2 Drivers and nonexempt employees are represented by Service Employees International Union (SEIU), Local 721. In FY 2021, an operations manager position was created with the promotion of the operations supervisor. The operations manager now oversees all transit operations including vehicle maintenance. Staff turnover and attrition were minimal prior to the pandemic. In FY 2021, Beaumont Transit hired two drivers and saw the departure of six part-time drivers which resulted in a driver shortage during portions of the pandemic.

Prospective drivers are recruited through job postings at City Hall and on the City’s website as well as through newspaper classified advertising. The City has also utilized GovernmentJobs.com through the NeoGov online platform as a recruitment tool. Candidates are required to submit an H-6 printout from the Department of Motor Vehicles as well as undergoing an interview, background checks, Department of Transportation medical clearance, and fingerprinting. During the audit period, in particular during COVID-19, candidate no-shows for interviews increased to about half, a trend driven by many factors such as availability of other employment, government

2 Vehicle maintenance staff service all City vehicles including transit.

Triennial Performance Audit of Beaumont Transit – FYs 2019-2021 Michael Baker International - 31 31
stimulus checks and unemployment benefits, and required drug and alcohol tests. Drivers are required to have a Class B license with a passenger endorsement. School bus operator experience is considered a plus. Training consists of 40 hours behind-the-wheel instruction.

There are two driver trainers on staff. Drivers also undergo sensitivity training that includes wheelchair securement, as well as sessions from the CHP and quarterly police training.

Maintenance

Vehicle maintenance for Beaumont Transit is conducted by the City. Preventive maintenance inspections (PMIs) are performed on a 6,000-mile or 90-day inspection schedule. Tune-ups are performed every three months on the Cummins powered CNG buses. Diesel vehicles are certified annually in October. Fire suppression systems are inspected every six months and CNG tanks are inspected every 36,000 miles.

Bus vehicle maintenance occurs at the City Fleet Maintenance facility located at 550 North California Avenue. The garage has three service bays; however, the service bays cannot accommodate the vehicles due to their size. Therefore, a portable lift is used to service the vehicles outside. The City has been seeking Automotive Service Excellence certification for its mechanics. A–Z Bus Sales offers wheelchair lift maintenance training.

Beaumont Transit utilizes the Dossier fleet maintenance software program, which operates on a web-based platform. In addition, Beaumont Transit acquired Zonar for pre- and post-trip inspections. Vehicle parts are ordered in bulk from a local vendor, O’Reilly Auto Parts, located at 695 East 6th Street in Beaumont. Inventory cycle counts are conducted on an annual basis.

Beaumont Transit has reported supply chain issues with Ford vehicle parts.

Flyers Energy is the primary fuel vendor. The CNG vehicles are fueled at stations at the Beaumont Unified School District’s transportation yard, located at 1001 Cougar Way. Under construction is a dedicated $1.5 million CNG fueling facility located on a parcel at the intersection of West 4th Street and Veile Avenue. The new facility eliminates Beaumont Transit's reliance and dependence on the limited fueling available at the school district. Fueling the CNG buses has been problematic and, more frequently than not, the school district station is unavailable, forcing the fleet to fuel at stations located as far away as Hemet and Moreno Valley.

Additionally, the parcel will include slow-fill stations for each CNG bus in the fleet, with room for expansion, giving Beaumont Transit the ability to fuel CNG vehicles during non-operational hours.

The CHP is responsible for certifying Beaumont’s maintenance facilities and inspecting vehicles on an annual basis. Inspections conducted during the audit period were rated satisfactory. Road call data were not provided by the operator. The recent implementation of the Dossier fleet maintenance software and Zonar allowed for road call data to be downloaded into TransTrack.

Beaumont Transit started reporting road call data in TransTrack pursuant to a prior audit recommendation.

Triennial Performance Audit of Beaumont Transit – FYs 2019-2021 Michael Baker International - 32 32
Planning

Beaumont Transit prepares a Short-Range Transit Plan (SRTP) on an annual basis. The SRTP covers a three-year planning horizon and includes a system overview; services and performance analysis for each route and service provided; service changes; and financial and capital plans.

Under the Existing Service and Route Performance chapter, a series of recommendations for service improvements is presented for each route or program.

Performance data from TransTrack Manager is also included to provide an annual comparison. In adhering to the SRTP analysis element, Beaumont must meet at least four out of seven discretionary performance indicators. There is one mandatory indicator, which is the farebox recovery ratio set at 10 percent. Using the SRTP covering FY 2020-21 through FY 2022-23, Table V-1 summarizes the FY 2020-21 performance targets. Beaumont met five out of the eight performance indicator targets.

Table V-1
Beaumont Transit Performance Targets
Performance Indicators FY 2020-21 Target
Actual
Performance Met Target
Farebox Recovery >=10.00% 14.43%* Yes
Operating Cost Per Revenue Hour =$15.80 & =$3.32 & =$57.43 & =$2.92 & =3.09 & =0.15 & <=0.21 0.30 Yes - Better Source: City of Beaumont, TransTrack Manager
*Farebox recovery ratio is derived from unaudited cost and revenue data.

In addition to the annual SRTP process, Beaumont conducted a COA which was completed in November 2020. The prior COA was conducted in May 2014. The latest COA involved a 100 percent ride check of all fixed-route, regional, and commuter routes to gauge service demand in light of the demographic changes that have taken place in the city. The COA is a five-year action plan with 15 service and program recommendations. The implementation plan is structured over three phases. The short-term implementation phase is focused on on-time performance adjustments and an update to the Beaumont Transit’s bus stop placement policy. The mid- and long-term phases are focused on new service opportunities and capital improvements, including a fleet maintenance and operations facility, an electric vehicle charging station in downtown, and vehicle replacement.

Marketing

Beaumont uses several media approaches in marketing its transit services. During the audit period, the system underwent an extensive rebranding as the shared Pass Transit branding

Triennial Performance Audit of Beaumont Transit – FYs 2019-2021 Michael Baker International - 33 33
agreement with Banning was phased out. Under the current interagency service agreement, each agency agreed to cooperate in providing the public with specific transit information by advertising the operations of both agencies and promoting the general usage of public transit. In the spirit of this agreement, Beaumont includes a link on its transit page to Banning Transit.

Printed schedules and other marketing materials are produced in-house. Nevertheless, Beaumont Transit has relied primarily on electronic media such as its website and social media to promote transit. The City of Beaumont website contains a page devoted to the transit program ( https://www.beaumontca.gov/90/Transit) , which was updated during the audit period. The transit page provides general information, fares, and modal links to the fixed-route, commuter, and Dial-A-Ride services as well as links to other regional transit services and trip planning tools.

The trip planner interactive tool is powered by Google Transit. With the phaseout of the Pass Transit brand, the City implemented a new brand identity, named Beaumont Transit. Given the relatively new branding of the service, emphasis on cleanliness during the COVID pandemic, and alterations of routes, Beaumont could re-engage with its customers to gain feedback firsthand and collect direct input about its operations. Regular surveying of riders could be undertaken either formally or informally as a gauge of the changes made to the transit system.

There are quick response (QR) codes on route maps and at bus stops for smartphone users to download transit information. Bus shelters have been equipped with kiosks containing schedule information. In the area of social media, Beaumont Transit posts content on Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter.

In addition, transit buses are equipped with GPS locators that can be accessed through a mobile app called DoubleMap, which includes website access ( http://beaumont.doublemap.com/map/) so that users can access real-time information and GPS coordinates of all routes currently in service.

Beaumont Transit staff engages the community through events and presentations. A free shuttle service is offered during the annual Cherry Festival in Beaumont. During school orientations, staff meets with students and their parents to educate them on their transit options in the service area. In conjunction with the Commuter Link Routes 120 and 125, staff participates in regional veteran committees to promote veteran transportation services from the Pass Area to Loma Linda Veterans Administration Hospital. Travel training presentations have been conducted at local homeowners’ associations, though this was suspended during COVID-19.

Beaumont Transit participates in the Go-Pass program in conjunction with Mt. San Jacinto College. Student pass holders ride the system for free by presenting their student identification card with the Go-Pass sticker. The agreement for the Go-Pass program is between RTA and the college; however, there are no provisions in the agreement for Beaumont to receive any of the revenues despite participating in the program and offering free rides to the students. Beaumont Transit approached and met with representatives of Mt. San Jacinto College and RTA about executing a fare revenue agreement that would benefit Beaumont Transit. The parties were not able to come to an agreement due to a lack of interest on the part of the college and RTA.

Triennial Performance Audit of Beaumont Transit – FYs 2019-2021 Michael Baker International - 34 34
Beaumont Transit will propose in the FY 2023 Short-Range Transit Plan to remove it from the fare schedule.

General Administration and Management

The City of Beaumont was incorporated November 18, 1912, as a general law city and currently operates under a council/manager form of government. The five-member City Council serves as the City’s principal legislative body and each councilmember is elected for a four-year term. The mayor and the mayor pro tem are elected from the City Council and serve one-year terms but no more than two consecutive terms. The City Council meets the first and third Tuesdays of each month at 6:00 p.m. at the Beaumont Civic Center. The council is reported to be supportive of the transit service.

The chief administrative officer for the City is the City manager, who is appointed by the City Council. The City manager oversees and coordinates City departments and services including transit operations. Transit is a division of the Community Services Department and overseen by a transit operations director, who is assisted by two administrative employees: a transit operations manager and a management analyst.

The primary source of transit funding support is derived from the Local Transportation Fund (LTF) for operations. Beaumont Transit submits the annual TDA claim for funds to RCTC. TDA claims are based on Beaumont Transit’s annual budget projections and the financial element of the SRTP. Based on the audited financial statements, Beaumont Transit’s LTF allocation was $2,349,215 in FY 2019; $2,889,230 in FY 2020; and $2,433,985 in FY 2021. State Transportation Assistance (STA) funds received by Beaumont Transit were $1,575,040 in FY 2019; $74,200 in FY 2020; and $851,212 in FY 2021. STA is used primarily toward capital assistance.

Beaumont Transit’s annual TDA claim and transit budget are based on the prior year’s budget and the finance director’s analysis of the SRTP projections. Costs for service expansion are estimated and include projected employee compensation and benefit increases. The finance director is tasked with completion and submittal of Beaumont Transit’s TDA claim and external reports such as the Transit Operators Financial Transactions Report to the State Controller. The City’s recent administrative reorganization has resulted in more financial controls and protocols.

Grants Management

Grant funding allocated toward the transit system has been derived from state sources composed of Proposition 1B, SB 1 State of Good Repair (SGR), and LCTOP funds. Under the Proposition 1B Public Transportation Modernization, Improvement & Service Enhancement Account (PTMISEA) program, Beaumont received funding for vehicle purchases, bus shelter, and CNG facility upgrades. At the end of June 30, 2021, Beaumont Transit had an unexpended balance of $24,358 in PTMISEA funds.

Triennial Performance Audit of Beaumont Transit – FYs 2019-2021 Michael Baker International - 35 35
Beaumont Transit applied for SB 1 SGR program funds toward the construction of the new consolidated administrative, fleet maintenance, and operations facility. In addition, Beaumont Transit received LCTOP funding toward the rehabilitation of three bus stops and shelter adjacent to the Walmart transfer station as well as toward free fare days.

The finance director tracks the financial element of the SRTP and provides quarterly reporting to RCTC through the capital tracking report. A management analyst in Administrative Services updates the grant spreadsheet and the resources director is responsible for capital project management and procurement with approval of the finance director. The management analyst initiates grant application process and prepares the reporting. Beaumont does not utilize federal transit funding for operating expenses, thus avoiding federal transit grant and Title VI reporting requirements.

Triennial Performance Audit of Beaumont Transit – FYs 2019-2021 Michael Baker International - 36 36
Section VI

Statement of Facts

The following summarizes factual events and trends obtained from this triennial audit covering fiscal years 2019 through 2021. A set of recommendations is then provided.

1. Of the compliance requirements pertaining to Beaumont Transit, the operator fully complied with five out of the eight applicable requirements. Beaumont Transit was in partial compliance with regard to the timely completion and submittal of its Transit Operator Financial Transactions Report to the State Controller, annual fiscal and compliance audits and farebox recovery attainment. Three additional compliance requirements did not apply to the operator (intermediate and urban farebox recovery ratio and the use of federal funds).

2. Based on the farebox calculation in the annual Transit System Financial Statements (audited), Beaumont’s farebox recovery ratio met or exceeded the required minimum standard of 10 percent in two of the three audit years. The system-wide farebox recovery ratios were 11.68 percent in FY 2019, 7.82 percent in FY 2020, and 22.52 percent in FY 2021.3 Beaumont Transit utilized an allowable combination of additional local support revenues plus exclusion of new services costs in order to meet minimum farebox recovery attainment in FY 2021.

3. The audited farebox ratio in FY 2019-20 was adversely impacted from several significant factors. That year was the first Pass Transit split up into Banning Transit and Beaumont Transit, which essentially eliminated Beaumont’s ability to effectively get passengers to social service locations in Banning without transfers. The COVID-19 pandemic and statewide shelter-in-place order starting in March 2020 further contributed to the performance decline including suspension of fare collection.

4. Beaumont Transit participates in the CHP Transit Operator Compliance Program in which the CHP conducted inspections within the 13 months prior to each TDA claim. The CHP inspection reports submitted for review were found to be satisfactory.

5. The annual operating budget did not increase above 15 percent but did exhibit fluctuations during the audit period due to COVID-19 pandemic impacts. Beaumont saw increases of 1.9 percent and 13.6 percent, respectively, during FY 2019 and FY 2020. The budget exhibited a decrease of 10.2 percent in FY 2021. The FY 2020 budgetary increase is attributed to higher salaries and fringe benefits.

3 AB 90, passed into law and signed by the governor in June 2020 in response to the COVID-19 pandemic impacts, prohibits the imposition of penalties on a transit operator that does not maintain the required ratio of fare revenues to operating cost during the FY 2019–20 or FY 2020–21.

Triennial Performance Audit of Beaumont Transit – FYs 2019-2021 Michael Baker International - 37 37

6. Beaumont satisfactorily implemented two of the four prior audit recommendations. The two recommendations pertained to the inclusion of a link to Banning Transit on the Beaumont Transit web page and the tracking of road calls in TransTrack Manager. One recommendation pertaining to fare sharing agreement with RTA and Mt. San Jacinto College for Go-Pass riders was not implemented and is no longer applicable and the recommendation pertaining to the completion and submittal of separate State Controller Reports for both general and specialized service was not implemented is being carried forward for full implementation.

7. Operating cost per vehicle service hour, an indicator of cost efficiency, increased 62.1 percent system-wide from $108.08 in the FY 2018 base year to $175.20 in FY 2021. System- wide operating costs (based on audited data) decreased 1.2 percent during the period, while vehicle service hours decreased by 39.1 percent. The average annual decrease in operating costs was 0.3 percent. Operating costs held relatively steady while service hours declined due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

8. Operating cost per passenger, an indicator of cost effectiveness, increased 398.2 percent system-wide from $13.55 in FY 2018 to $67.49 in FY 2021. Ridership system-wide decreased

80.2 percent during the review period from 197,775 passengers in FY 2018 to 39,213 passengers in FY 2021, while operating costs decreased by 1.2 percent over the same period.

The split of Pass Transit and the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in a significant decline in ridership.

9. Passengers per vehicle service hour, which measures the effectiveness of the service delivered, decreased 67.5 percent between FY 2018 and FY 2021 system-wide from 8 to 2.6 passengers per hour. Fixed-route operations were consistent with this trend, with a decrease of 70.4 percent over the same period from 8.7 to 2.6 passengers per hour. In contrast, Dial-A- Ride operations exhibited a lesser decrease of 1.2 percent from 3.23 to 3.19 passengers per hour. The trend in this indicator demonstrates a significant decline in passenger trips as compared to the decline in vehicle service hours.

10. Passengers per vehicle service mile, another indicator of service effectiveness, decreased

75.7 percent between FY 2018 and FY 2021 system-wide from 0.48 to 0.12 passengers per mile. For fixed-route operations, the number of passengers per service mile decreased by

76.6 percent from 0.49 to 0.12. Passengers per service mile on Dial-A-Ride decreased by 53.6 percent during the same period, from 0.32 in FY 2018 to 0.15 in FY 2021. From the FY 2018 base year to FY 2021, actual vehicle service miles decreased 18.5 percent system-wide.

11. A new interagency services agreement was adopted between the Cities of Beaumont and Banning in July 2019. The new agreement allows for interline transfers between the two systems at the Walmart in Beaumont and the San Gorgonio Memorial Hospital in Banning.

This dissolution of the MOU resulted in the two transit systems developing their own distinct identities and service boundaries. Highland Springs Avenue became the boundary between the two systems.

Triennial Performance Audit of Beaumont Transit – FYs 2019-2021 Michael Baker International - 38 38

12. Beaumont Transit implemented measures and protocols to mitigate the spread of COVID-19.

Fare collection was suspended in March 2020. Beaumont Transit installed driver barriers, enforced mandated masking protocols, and implemented enhanced cleaning measures.

During the pandemic, Route 3/4, which generally operates Saturdays, was expanded to operate Monday through Saturday; Commuter Routes 120 and 125 were combined; and Route 2 was eventually eliminated.

13. In FY 2021, an operations manager position was created with the promotion of the operations supervisor. The operations manager now oversees all transit operations including vehicle maintenance.

14. Beaumont conducted a Comprehensive Operational Analysis (COA) which was completed in November 2020. The latest COA involved a 100 percent ride check of all fixed-route, regional, and commuter routes to gauge service demand in light of the demographic changes that have taken place in the city. The COA is a five-year action plan with 15 service and program recommendations. The implementation plan is structured over three phases.

Triennial Performance Audit of Beaumont Transit – FYs 2019-2021 Michael Baker International - 39 39
Recommendations

1. Prepare and submit separate State Controller Transit Operators Financial Transactions Reports for general public transit and specialized service.

This recommendation is carried over from the prior performance audit. Beaumont’s annual Transit Operators Financial Transactions Report to the State Controller has historically combined information for both general public (fixed route/commuter) and specialized service for seniors and persons with disabilities (ADA-certified and noncertified). Although the State Controller’s Office has not provided notice to the City, written instructions by the state to prepare this particular report require separate reporting of these modes. In the General Instruction Form completed by Beaumont Transit, a selection must be made as to which mode of transit is represented in the report. The options are general public use or elderly/disabled.

The Transit Operators Financial Transactions Report Instructions contain the following passages under the General Instruction Form:

Transit operators providing two types of service, (general public use and transit service exclusively for the elderly/handicapped) must complete a separate report for each type of service.

… a separate report must be filed for each type of service provided: General Public Use Service or Specialized Service exclusive for elderly and/or handicapped. For example, if an agency has received Article 4 and Article 8(c) monies to provide General Public Use Service, the agency should submit one report. If that agency has also received Article 4 monies to provide Specialized Service for the elderly and/or handicapped, then a report must be submitted for the Specialized Service operations.

The submission of separate reports to the State Controller will further demonstrate Beaumont’s proactive approach to compliance with state reporting instructions. Beaumont Transit should coordinate preparation of separate reports with the City Finance Department to complete separate financial reporting of general public and specialized services. This will include obtaining a new identification number for Dial-A-Ride reports from the State Controller’s Office, and separating financial, asset, and operating data between the two modes in their respective SCO reports.

2. Ensure timely completion and submittal of external TDA financial reports.

Beaumont Transit was in partial compliance with the timely completion and submittal of its annual fiscal and compliance audits. The late submittal may be due to the financial closeout procedures needed to generate the financial information required in the Controller’s report.

This in turn also impacts the timely submittal of its fiscal and compliance audits which cannot be completed until the financial closeout by the City. The TDA statute provides the submittal

Triennial Performance Audit of Beaumont Transit – FYs 2019-2021 Michael Baker International - 40 40
timelines and allowable extensions granted by RCTC. Although City financial closeout procedures are not within the scope of this performance audit, it is suggested that a schedule be coordinated between the City’s Finance Department, TDA fiscal auditor, and RCTC that anticipates financial closeout by the City and completion of the external TDA financial reports. The financial closeout triggers the undertaking of the TDA financial reports, and close tracking of the timeliness of the closeout could advance some aspects and earlier preparation of the TDA reports.

3. Regularly update the vehicle fleet list in TransTrack.

A printout of the Beaumont Transit fleet in TransTrack provided to the auditor incorrectly includes three Gillig commuter buses in FY 2020-21, artificially raising the total fleet number.

Beaumont transit staff verified the incorrect listing and provided a separate vehicle list that does not include these commuter bus models. The TransTrack data should be reviewed, modified, and verified regularly to accurately reflect the current vehicle fleet and services type, whether local, commuter, or demand response.

4. Re-engage with riders and collect user input.

Given the relatively new branding of the service, emphasis on cleanliness during the COVID pandemic, and alterations of routes, Beaumont Transit has undergone multiple changes over the past several years. As a way to continue to improve, the transit operator should re- engage with its customers to gain feedback firsthand and collect direct input about its operations. Regular surveying of riders could be undertaken as a customer facing activity to gauge public perception of the changes made to the transit system. Various low cost and low barrier survey means should be considered such as an on-line survey on the transit page on Beaumont Transit’s website, or informal conversations occurring between passengers and drivers that are reported back to transit management. Additional assets such as electric vehicles also provide opportunity for the system to capitalize on its brand and appeal to its ridership and service area.

Staff Report

TO: City Council
FROM: Nicole Wheelwright, Deputy City Clerk
DATE December 20, 2022
SUBJECT: Appointments to City Board, Committees and Commission

Description Appointments to Administrative Appeals Board, Finance and Audit Committee, Economic Development Committee, and Planning Commission Background and Analysis:

The following board, committees and commission have members with term ending dates in which City Council shall appoint new or returning members to. An application period was opened on November 2, 2022, and closed on December 8, 2022.

Applications received have been attached.

Board of Administrative Appeals
Nine (9) vacancies
Applications received: Four (4) – See Attachment A

Finance and Audit Committee
Three (3) Resident Member vacancies
Two (2) Alternate Member vacancies
Applications received: One (1) – See Attachment B

Economic Development Committee
Three (3) Beaumont Business Community Member vacancies
One (1) Community Member/Non Business vacancy
One (1) Local Developer/Economic Development Rep vacancy Two (2) Alternate Member vacancies
Applications received: Two (2) – See Attachment C

Planning Commission
Three (3) vacancies
Applications received: Ten (10) - See Attachment D

Per Beaumont Municipal Code Section 2.04.100 – Appointments to City Boards and Commissions, the selection process shall be as follows:

A. Members of the public may apply when a vacancy on a board or commission occurs. The City Council will conduct interviews of applicants at a City Council meeting once a sufficient number of applications have been received.

B. Upon completion of applicant interviews, Council Members may nominate applicants to be appointed to the board or commission. Once all nominations are received, a vote will be taken for each nomination beginning with the first applicant nominated. Council Members may vote mu ltiple times if there are multiple vacancies for the board or commission.

C. If a nominee receives a majority vote from a quorum of the Council, that nominee shall be appointed to the board or commission.

Fiscal Impact:

City staff estimates the cost of preparing this report to be $390.

Recommended Action:

Conduct interviews followed by the selection process outlined in BMC 2.04.100.

Attachments:

A. BOAA Applications
B. FAC Application
C. EDC Application
D. PC Applications

Board of Administrative Appeals Applications
December 2022

Steve Cooley
Allen Koblin
Ronald Rader
Timothy Ousley

1 Nicole Wheelwright
From:[email protected]
Sent:Wednesday, December 7, 2022 8:53 PM
To:Nicole Wheelwright
Subject:Online Form Submittal: Board of Administrative Appeals 2022 Categories:Print
Board of Administrative Appeals 2022

Applications to fill the vacant seats of the City of Beaumont Board of Administrative Appeals will be accepted through Thursday, December 8, 2022, at 5:00 p.m.

Selection process will be held during the City Council Meeting of December 20, 2022, at 6:00 p.m.

First Name Steve
Last Name Cooley
Primary Phone
Alternate Phone
Home Address
Address 2 Field not completed.

Email
Occupation/Profession retired forensic accountant
Employer Name Field not completed.

Are you 18 year of age or
older?
Yes
Please select the option
that best represents you
Beaumont Resident
Questions
Will you be able to serve a
full two-year term?
Yes
Within the next two years,
what days of the week
Most any day and time

2 would you normally be
available to serve as a
Board Member?
What days/times would you
not be available to serve?
Field not completed.

Additional Information
Resume Field not completed.

Additional Information City.docx

Email not displaying correctly? View it in your browser.

I have conducted several hundreds of administrative hearings during my employment. I have excellent skills in keeping witnesses and adjudicators on tack.

1 Nicole Wheelwright
From:[email protected]
Sent:Tuesday, December 6, 2022 10:10 AM
To:Nicole Wheelwright
Subject:Online Form Submittal: Board of Administrative Appeals 2022 Categories:Print
Board of Administrative Appeals 2022

Applications to fill the vacant seats of the City of Beaumont Board of Administrative Appeals will be accepted through Thursday, December 8, 2022, at 5:00 p.m.

Selection process will be held during the City Council Meeting of December 20, 2022, at 6:00 p.m.

First Name Allen
Last Name Koblin
Primary Phone
Alternate Phone
Home Address
Address 2 Field not completed.

Email
Occupation/Profession COMMERCIAL RETIREAL ESTATE
Employer Name SELF EMPLOYED
Are you 18 year of age or
older?
Yes
Please select the option
that best represents you
Beaumont Resident
Questions
Will you be able to serve a
full two-year term?
Yes
Within the next two years,
what days of the week
AVAILABLE ANY DAY OF THE WEEK FROM 7:00AM TO
6:00PM

2 would you normally be
available to serve as a
Board Member?
What days/times would you
not be available to serve?
AVAILABLE EVERY DAY OF THE WEEK.

Additional Information
Resume Field not completed.

Additional Information Field not completed.

Email not displaying correctly? View it in your browser.

1 Nicole Wheelwright
From:[email protected]
Sent:Wednesday, December 7, 2022 7:20 PM
To:Nicole Wheelwright
Subject:Online Form Submittal: Board of Administrative Appeals 2022 Categories:Print
Board of Administrative Appeals 2022

Applications to fill the vacant seats of the City of Beaumont Board of Administrative Appeals will be accepted through Thursday, December 8, 2022, at 5:00 p.m.

Selection process will be held during the City Council Meeting of December 20, 2022, at 6:00 p.m.

First Name Ronald
Last Name Rader
Primary Phone
Alternate Phone N/A
Home Address
Address 2 N/A
Email
Occupation/Profession SGMH Board of Directors / Secretary Employer Name San Gorgonio Memorial Hospital
Are you 18 year of age or
older?
Yes
Please select the option
that best represents you
Beaumont Resident
Questions
Will you be able to serve a
full two-year term?
Yes
Within the next two years,
what days of the week
Monday through Friday

2 would you normally be
available to serve as a
Board Member?
What days/times would you
not be available to serve?
Able to serve all days
Additional Information
Resume Ronald Rader Resume.docx
Additional Information Field not completed.

Email not displaying correctly? View it in your browser.

Ronald
Rader
, Beaumont,
CA 92223

Experience
2014 - 2019
Administrative Appeals Hearing Officer / Beaumont, California

2014 - 2022
Board of Directors / San Gorgonio Memorial Hospital, Banning, California, Finance Committee, Board of Director Secretary

2010 - 2022
Oversight Committee Measure “A” and Measure “D” / San Gorgonio Memorial Hospital, Banning, California

2008 - 2014
Solera Home Owners Board of Directors / Beaumont, California

2013 - 2016
Beaumont Cherry Valley Rotary Board of Directors / Beaumont, California

1977 - 2004
Manager / Ralph’s Grocery Company / Various Locations in California Activities
Beaumont / Cherry Valley Rotary Foundation Board Member Banning / San Gorgonio Pass Rotary
Beaumont Chamber of Commerce
Banning Chamber of Commerce
Boys & Girls Club – Director
Beaumont / Banning Student of the Month
Regional Collaborative Committee

1 Nicole Wheelwright
From:[email protected]
Sent:Tuesday, November 8, 2022 5:25 PM
To:Nicole Wheelwright
Subject:Online Form Submittal: Board of Administrative Appeals 2022 Board of Administrative Appeals 2022

Applications to fill the vacant seats of the City of Beaumont Board of Administrative Appeals will be accepted through Thursday, December 8, 2022, at 5:00 p.m.

Selection process will be held during the City Council Meeting of December 20, 2022, at 6:00 p.m.

First Name Timothy
Last Name Ousley
Primary Phone
Alternate Phone Field not completed.

Home Address
Address 2 Field not completed.

Email
Occupation/Profession Retired
Employer Name Field not completed.

Are you 18 year of age or
older?
Yes
Please select the option
that best represents you
Beaumont Resident
Questions
Will you be able to serve a
full two-year term?
Yes
Within the next two years,
what days of the week
would you normally be
All days

2 available to serve as a
Board Member?
What days/times would you
not be available to serve?
None
Additional Information
Resume Resume 1.pdf
Additional Information Field not completed.

Email not displaying correctly? View it in your browser.

Timothy P. Ousley

Beaumont, CA 92223

Tim Ousley
Retired after a long career in public service, I have the experience and skills to understand the needs of local government, labor-management relations, public policy, council-staff interaction, and community-based problem solving. I’m a 10-year Beaumont resident.

Education:

Bachelor of Science in Public Administration, University of Laverne, 1993 Master of Public Administration, California State University San Bernardino, 1997

Law Enforcement Community Educator
Ontario Police: 1968-1972
Cadet to Officer

Fontana Police: 1973-2004
Officer to Captain

Rialto Police: 2005-2006
Interim Deputy Chief

Board of Directors:

Fontana AYSO
Fontana YMCA
Chula Vista Yacht Club

Volunteerism:

Fontana Little League
City of Fontana Youth Sports
Fontana AYSO
Greater Fontana United
Way
California Baptist University
Political Science &
Criminology
1994-1997

California State University,
San Bernardino
Research Methods in Public
Administration (Master’s
Level)
1997-2001

Served at all levels—entry level,
supervisory, management and
command staff. Involvement in
all aspects of municipal law
enforcement, including patrol,
traffic, detective, adminis-
tration, budget, community-
oriented problem solving,
working closely with Council &
other city departments, and sat
on both sides of the table
during collective bargaining.

Coached in youth sports for
over 10 years and was on the
AYSO Board.

Owned a boat and moored it in
Chula Vista (San Diego Bay).

Served as a Director on the
Yacht Club there.

As an adjunct professor, taught
undergraduate (Cal Baptist) and
graduate level (CSUSB) courses
in Political Science, Criminology
and Public Administration.

Specialized in Research
Methods in Public
Administration.

Finance and Audit Committee Application
December 2022

Ronald Rader

1 Nicole Wheelwright
From:[email protected]
Sent:Wednesday, December 7, 2022 7:28 PM
To:Nicole Wheelwright
Subject:Online Form Submittal: Finance & Audit Committee Appointment 2022 Categories:Print
Finance & Audit Committee Appointment 2022

Applications to fill the vacant seats of the City of Beaumont Finance & Audit Committee will be accepted through Thursday, December 8, 2022, at 5:00 p.m.

Selection process will be held during the City Council Meeting of December 20, 2022, at 6:00 p.m.

First Name Ronald
Last Name Rader
Primary Phone
Alternate Phone N/A
Home Address
Address 2 N/A
Email
Occupation/Profession SGMH Board of Directors / Secretary Employer Name San Gorgonio Memorial Hospital
Are you 18 year of age or
older?
Yes
Do you reside in the City of
Beaumont?
Yes
Questions
Are you aware of any
conflicts, financial or
otherwise, which could
affect your appointment as
No

2 a Finance & Audit
Committee member?
If you answer "Yes", please
explain
N/A
Qualifications - Briefly state
your qualifications,
including any education,
skill, or background related
to finance & audit functions
Degree from Cypress College in Marketing and Finance.

Serving on the San Gorgonio Memorial Hospital for eight years.

I have served as Chairman of this committee. During my career with Ralph's Grocery Company as a manager I was
responsible for budgets at various locations. I also worked as an internal auditor at the corporate office.

Additional Information
Resume Ronald Rader Resume.docx
Additional Information Field not completed.

Email not displaying correctly? View it in your browser.

Ronald
Rader
Beaumont,
CA 92223

Experience
2014 - 2019
Administrative Appeals Hearing Officer / Beaumont, California

2014 - 2022
Board of Directors / San Gorgonio Memorial Hospital, Banning, California, Finance Committee, Board of Director Secretary

2010 - 2022
Oversight Committee Measure “A” and Measure “D” / San Gorgonio Memorial Hospital, Banning, California

2008 - 2014
Solera Home Owners Board of Directors / Beaumont, California

2013 - 2016
Beaumont Cherry Valley Rotary Board of Directors / Beaumont, California

1977 - 2004
Manager / Ralph’s Grocery Company / Various Locations in California Activities
Beaumont / Cherry Valley Rotary Foundation Board Member Banning / San Gorgonio Pass Rotary
Beaumont Chamber of Commerce
Banning Chamber of Commerce
Boys & Girls Club – Director
Beaumont / Banning Student of the Month
Regional Collaborative Committee

Economic Development Committee Applications
December 2022

Richard Bennecke
Steven Mehlman
Rob Moran

1 Nicole Wheelwright
From:[email protected]
Sent:Monday, November 14, 2022 2:59 PM
To:Nicole Wheelwright
Subject:Online Form Submittal: Economic Development Committee Appointment 2022 Economic Development Committee Appointment 2022

Applications to fill the vacant seats of the City of Beaumont Economic Development Committee will be accepted through Thursday, December 8, 2022 at 5:00 p.m.

Selection process will be held during the City Council Meeting of December 20, 2022 at 6:00 p.m.

First Name Richard
Last Name Bennecke
Primary Phone
Alternate Phone Field not completed.

Home Address
Address 2 Field not completed.

Email
Occupation/Profession Retired
Employer Name Field not completed.

Are you 18 year of age or
older?
Yes
Do you represent a local
business or industry within
the limits of the City of
Beaumont?
No
Questions
Are you aware of any
conflicts, financial or
otherwise, which could
affect your appointment as
No

2 an Economic Development
Committee member?
If you answer "Yes", please
explain
no
Qualifications - Briefly state
your qualifications,
including any education,
skill, or background related
to economic development
functions
34 years as a Public Manager/Administrator with City, State and Federal Gov agencies.

Served on the following Beaumont City
Commissions/Committees: Planning Commission, Audit/Fin.

Committee, Economic Dev. Committee, Downtown Specific
Plan Committee, General Plan Committee.

As Chief of Staff for the Mayor of the City of San Bernardino, I was the Mayor's liaison to the City's Redevelopment
Committee, ,Budget Committee , City Beautification
Committee, and City Schools Partnership Program.

My final career assignment had me working for the Sec. of Defense as a liaison between the Federal Gov, County Board of Supervisors, local elected City Officials and the Business Development Community. The Mission was to close an active Military Installation and assist the community in its efforts to secure the military installation and redevelop the property for commercial and industrial use.

Education: H.S Diploma, BA Pol Sci, Masters, Public Adm.

Additional Information
Resume Field not completed.

Additional Information Field not completed.

Email not displaying correctly? View it in your browser.

1 Nicole Wheelwright
From:[email protected]
Sent:Monday, November 7, 2022 12:46 PM
To:Nicole Wheelwright
Subject:Online Form Submittal: Economic Development Committee Appointment 2022 Economic Development Committee Appointment 2022

Applications to fill the vacant seats of the City of Beaumont Economic Development Committee will be accepted through Thursday, December 8, 2022 at 5:00 p.m.

Selection process will be held during the City Council Meeting of December 20, 2022 at 6:00 p.m.

First Name Steven
Last Name Mehlman
Primary Phone
Alternate Phone
Home Address , Beaumont CA 92223
Address 2 Field not completed.

Email
Occupation/Profession Retired/volunteer
Employer Name n.a.

Are you 18 year of age or
older?
Yes
Do you represent a local
business or industry within
the limits of the City of
Beaumont?
No
Questions
Are you aware of any
conflicts, financial or
otherwise, which could
affect your appointment as
No

2 an Economic Development
Committee member?
If you answer "Yes", please
explain
No
Qualifications - Briefly state
your qualifications,
including any education,
skill, or background related
to economic development
functions
Served on the Beaumont General Plan Advisory Committee.

Also served as City Clerk and a member of the New Fire
Station Advisory Committee. Board Member of Solera HOA.

Past chair of Riverside County Council on Aging.

Have lived in Beaumont for more than a decade. Have always supported responsible economic growth of our community, including abiding by our General Plan, providing infrastructure to support development, etc.

Additional Information
Resume Resume-2022.doc
Additional Information Field not completed.

Email not displaying correctly? View it in your browser.

Steven Mehlman, APR
, Beaumont, CA 92223

Experienced and Talented Communications Pro
Recognized expertise in writing op-ed columns, letters to the editor, policy papers, speeches, ad copy, strategic plans, and other written communications. Proficient public speaker with extensive media relations experience. Worked on public relations and advocacy campaigns at local, state, and national levels.

Professional Experience
 City Clerk, Beaumont, CA 2019 – present  Communications Consultant, Beaumont, CA 2013 – present  Communications Manager, UDW Homecare Providers Union, San Diego, CA 2008 – 2013  Communications Consultant, California Professional
Firefighters, Sacramento, CA 2008  Communications Director, California State Employees Assn., Sacramento, CA 2004 -2007
 Senior Communications Specialist, ACS Inc. (for U.S.

Department of Energy), Atlanta, GA 2002 – 2004  Consumer Program Manager, AARP, Atlanta GA 1994 – 2001

Volunteer Leadership
 Senior Senator, CA Senior Legislature
 Past Chair, Riverside County Advisory Council on Aging  Member, Beaumont General Plan Task Force
 Member, Solera/Oak Valley Greens Homeowners Assn.
 Distinguished President, Crofton (MD) Kiwanis Club

Education/Professional Development
 American University, Washington, D.C., B.A. in Public Relations
 Accredited (APR) by Public Relations Society of America  Former member, PRSA National Advocacy Advisory Board

1 Nicole Wheelwright
From:Moran, Robert
Sent:Thursday, December 15, 2022 4:23 PM
To:Nicole Wheelwright
Cc:Kyle Warsinski
Subject:Beaumont Economic Development Committee Term Renewal Good Evening Ms. Wheelwright,

I would like to respectfully submit this email as a request to continue serving on the City’s Economic Development Committee. My term expires at the end of this calendar year and I was not able to reapply before the City’s filing deadline. I believe that the synergy between the City and County economic development teams is important and this committee allows us to maintain up to date on current City and County activities and best practices.

Please let me know if you need additional information.

Thank you,

Rob Moran

Confidentiality Disclaimer
This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure.

If you are not the author's intended recipient, be advised that you have received this email in error and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of this email is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error please delete all copies, both electronic and printed, and contact the author immediately.

County of Riverside California

Planning Commission Applications
December 2022

Sedrick Bedolla
David Castaldo
Steve Cooley
Steven Hovey
Allen Koblin
Dustin Nirschl
Peter Sierra
Nathan Smith
Robert Tinker
Eric Ustation

1 Nicole Wheelwright
From:[email protected]
Sent:Thursday, December 8, 2022 10:25 AM
To:Nicole Wheelwright
Subject:Online Form Submittal: Planning Commission Appointment 2022 Categories:Print
Planning Commission Appointment 2022

Applications to fill the vacant seats of the Beaumont Planning Commission will be accepted through Thursday, December 8, 2022 at 5:00 p.m.

Selection process will be held during the City Council Meeting of December 20, 2022 at 6:00 p.m.

First Name Sedrick
Last Name Bedolla
Primary Phone
Alternate Phone Field not completed.

Home Address
Address 2 Field not completed.

Email
Occupation/Profession Administrator
Employer Name Eisenhower Health
Are you 18 years of age or
older?
Yes
Are you a resident in the
City of Beaumont?
Yes
Questions
Please answer the following questions which are intended to assist the City Council in assessing your qualifications and experience for the Planning Commission vacancy.

Are you aware of any
conflicts, financial or
No

2 otherwise, which could
affect your appointment as
a Planning Commissioner?
Briefly state your
qualifications, including any
skills or background related
to City Planning,
development and
building/construction:

I have served on the Planning Commission for the last 10 months. I have greatly enjoyed learning about the functions of city government and its role on the daily lives of citizens What would your vision for
Beaumont’s future?
I seek to continue the path of responsible development in the city. I hope to see improved transportation corridors and improved infrastructure projects. I also would like to see the continued development of the downtown area as well as new business opportunities for the community.

If you were a Planning
Commission member
representing the Beaumont
Citizens, how would you
define “quality of life”?
Safe spaces for our families, and safe and efficient
thoroughfares for the community. Industrial spaces away from residential areas and community governments that helps local businesses.

What involvement do you
currently have in the
community?
I am on the Planning Commission presently, but my term
expires this month. I have coached and refereed several teams for the local soccer and basketball programs. I serve on the local AYSO Board.

Additional Information
Resume BedollaCV.doc
Additional Information Field not completed.

Email not displaying correctly? View it in your browser.

Sedrick D. Bedolla DBA, RRT

Beaumont Ca. 92223

Current Responsibilities:

 Director of Respiratory Care, Pulmonary Services, Interventional Bronchoscopy and Neurology, Eisenhower Health
 Clinical Assistant Professor for MHA and HCM programs, Southern Illinois University (SIU) at Carbondale
 Ongoing performance improvement and enhancing employee engagement of team of dynamic Respiratory Therapists, Registered Nurses, EEG Techs and Pulmonary Function Technicians in multiple departments in a 400 plus bed acute care hospital, Eisenhower Medical Center.  Responsible for direction of administrative and clinical aspects of the departments including Pulmonary Function Lab, Arterial Blood Gas Lab and Interventional Bronchoscopy Lab, Neurology Lab and Respiratory Therapy in coordination with activities of other hospital departments.
 Oversight of 3 Managers, 2 Discharge Coordinators, 7 Team Leaders including a staff of 75 Adult Respiratory Therapists, 7 NICU Therapists and 8 Therapists providing Pulmonary Function Testing, Registered Nurses in Interventional Bronchoscopy, and 3 EEG technicians supporting Neurology.
 Ensure staff and leaders receive continuous and current educational opportunities.  Develop, maintain, review and the implement policies and procedures for clinical activities, evaluations, in-service education and development of performance improvement standards.  Develops and implements department capital and operational budgets.  Responsible for a multi-million-dollar supply, equipment and payroll budget.  Provides employee feedback and conducts formal counseling sessions as needed. Conducts formal evaluations annually for every staff member.
 Active leader within the hospital and a member of several key hospital committees such as, Professional Practice, Critical Care, Pulmonary Section, Quality, Leadership Development, Clinical Competency, Value Analysis, and Pharmacy and Therapeutics.  Administrative Chair of the Opioid Stewardship Committee

PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE:

 Director of Respiratory Care and Pulmonary Services, Eisenhower Medical Center (EMC) Rancho Mirage Ca. 2012-Present:

Added Interventional Bronchoscopy in 2013
Added Neurology in 2016
 Clinical Assistant Professor for Sothern Illinois University MHA and HCM online instruction.  Manager, Respiratory Care Services (RCS) White Memorial Medical Center (WMMC) (2010- 2012), Clinical Supervisor, RCS WMMC (2009-2010) Shift Supervisor RCS WMMC (2004- 2009), Staff Therapist RCS WMMC 2002-2004.
 2007-2010: Director of Clinical Education, Concorde Career College.  2006-2007: Instructor of the Advanced Respiratory Therapy Course, Concorde Career College

Additional PROFFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE

 2003-2004: Deployed overseas in support of Operations Enduring Freedom and Iraqi Freedom  1999-2002: Supervisor, Respiratory Therapy Department, Wilford Hall Medical Center (USAF) San Antonio Tx.
 1995-1999: Non-Commissioned Officer in the USAF serving primarily as a Medical Technician (LVN) and Emergency Medical Technician (EMT). Duties also included supervising, training, and mentoring junior members.
 1993-1995: Enlisted member of the United States Air Force (USAF) serving primarily as an Operating Room technician.
 Certified as a College of American Pathologists (CAP) Inspector (2015), performed inspection of two facilities as a peer inspector.

Accomplishments in Current role:

 Upon accepting the position, departmental productivity was 0.35 UOS per productive hour (UOS/HR) .04 over budget with a yearly productivity average of 81%. Through the use of Lean process mapping, auditing, quality improvement/quality assessment (QI/QA) programs, staff input and empowerment, the department has now achieved a UOS of .26 per productive hour against a lowered budget target of .27. The Staff is averaging a 103% productivity levels when measured against national respiratory guidelines.
 Partnered with nursing leadership to reduce the number of Ventilator Associated Events (VAE) in the ICU. Brought the rate down from 4.1 per 1000 patient days to 0.0 in 2014. The Hospital did not have one VAE between July 2012 and July 2018.
 Reorganized the Respiratory Department, re-wrote job descriptions clarifying Therapists role in the facility which led to increased employee engagement scores and increased patient satisfaction scores.
 Created Discharge Coordinator position and assumed responsibility for reducing COPD and Pneumonia 30-day readmission rates. When process implemented, rates were 21%, as of April 2018, they average 12% and HASC scores have increased dramatically.  Guided and assisted the development of a new Interventional Bronchoscopy Service line.

Through construction oversight, capital acquisition, staff training, process flows and interdepartmental cooperation, developed this new service line. More outpatient procedures are now performed in a day than were performed in one month. We now support a physician that performs the most EBUS and interventional bronch cases in the nation.  A CAP inspection occurring shortly after I began the position and found 46 Phase II deficiencies, which caused the Lab CLIA license to be put in a probationary status. I collaborated with the staff and Lab leadership and was able to resolve all 46 deficiencies within 60 days and CAP accepted all remedies. EMC was then subjected to annual inspections and received no more than 3 Phase II deficiencies for the entire blood gas lab. The Lab had its license restored to full status.
 Achieved a score of 62% of staff fully engaged, reported by an independent survey company, one of the highest in the facility.
 Active mentor who ensures staff are continually challenged to be the best using several on- going Quality Improvement programs (QI). Constantly solicits input from front line care givers

always seeking the best answers to improve patient care. Continually challenging staff to own their environment and hold each other accountable for the care they provide.  Constantly challenges staff to utilize Lean methodologies to improve workflows and create more efficient and safe processes. Increased available PFT appointments from 32 to 50 per week, and reduced patient scheduling wait times from 4 weeks to 10 days.  Has achieved year over year reduction of FTE/UOS ratios, decreased supply costs per UOS and increased department billing by 30% and reduced audit challenges by 45%.  Actively seeks ways to improve patient safety, reduce costs and improve clinical outcomes through active participation and collaboration with other leaders and on hospital committees and working groups. EMC has achieved a 5-star rating from CMS and an A grade from Leap Frog. EMC has been rated #1 best place to work for RN’s in the state.  Calmly and compassionately communicates with patients and their family members regarding questions and concerns about care they received.
 Partnered with Local Skilled Nursing Facilities, local DME vendors and physician clinics to ensure patients receive appropriate follow up care reducing 30-day readmission rates. This included training for staff, developing a tracking mechanism to ensure follow up appointments, prescriptions deliveries and device deliveries.
 Created a career track for the Respiratory and Pulmonary Departments. Through active support of continuing education, 12 staff members attained their Adult Critical Care Specialist (ACCS) credential from our profession’s National Board.

EDUCATION:

 Doctorate in Business Administration (DBA) with a focus in Healthcare Administration.

Doctoral Research Dissertation: Preventable Error Reduction Leadership Strategies of Nurse Managers in a Hospital Setting.
 Master’s Degree in Business Administration (MBA) 2006.  Bachelor of Science degree in Business Management (BSBM) 2005.  Associate Degree in Cardiopulmonary Technology 2000.
 Associate Degree in Allied Health 1999.
 Critical Care Air Transport Team (CCATT) training (Basic) at Brooks Air Force Base (AFB), San Antonio, TX. 2002
 USAF Non-Commissioned Officer Academy. 1997
 CCATT training (Advanced) University of Cincinnati Medical Center. 2005

AWARDS

 November 2000: received top graduate honors from Cardiopulmonary School.  Awarded Air Medal for combat actions during Operation Iraqi Freedom.  Awarded 2 Air Force Commendation Medals, 1 Air force Achievement Medal, 6 Combat Readiness Medals, 3 Air Force Reserve Meritorious Service medals and 2 National Defense medals.
 Volunteered and assisted in building three houses for Habitat for Humanity.  Recognized as outstanding Respiratory Therapist as a member of the CCAT Team Baghdad International Airport (BIAP), Iraq.
 Voted world’s best Father by his kids! (twice)

1 Nicole Wheelwright
From:[email protected]
Sent:Thursday, December 8, 2022 10:46 AM
To:Nicole Wheelwright
Subject:Online Form Submittal: Planning Commission Appointment 2022 Categories:Print
Planning Commission Appointment 2022

Applications to fill the vacant seats of the Beaumont Planning Commission will be accepted through Thursday, December 8, 2022 at 5:00 p.m.

Selection process will be held during the City Council Meeting of December 20, 2022 at 6:00 p.m.

First Name David
Last Name Castaldo
Primary Phone
Alternate Phone Field not completed.

Home Address
Address 2 Field not completed.

Email
Occupation/Profession Business owner
Employer Name A.C. Equipment Incorporated
Are you 18 years of age or
older?
Yes
Are you a resident in the
City of Beaumont?
Yes
Questions
Please answer the following questions which are intended to assist the City Council in assessing your qualifications and experience for the Planning Commission vacancy.

Are you aware of any
conflicts, financial or
None that I am aware of.

2 otherwise, which could
affect your appointment as
a Planning Commissioner?
Briefly state your
qualifications, including any
skills or background related
to City Planning,
development and
building/construction:

Beaumont Planning Commission 2004 to 2008
Beaumont City Council 2010 to 2014
San Gorgonio Pass Water Agency 2016 to 2020
Beaumont Chamber of Commerce member since 1998
Owner of A.C. Equipment Incorporated since 1979
Owner of A.C. Propane since 1979
Operated 2 businesses in Beaumont since 1985
Owned 3 different businesses in Beaumont since 1998
Lived in the Pass area since 1975
Lived in the Beaumont / Cherry Valley area since 1997
Lived in Beaumont since 2003
Built 2 commercial buildings in Beaumont
Built one residential home in Beaumont
What would your vision for
Beaumont’s future?
To continue and create a community that meets and exceeds the visions and expectations of all of Beaumont’s residents.

If you were a Planning
Commission member
representing the Beaumont
Citizens, how would you
define “quality of life”?
Meeting and exceeding Beaumont citizens expectations and visions.

What involvement do you
currently have in the
community?
More than some, not as much as others.

I have participated in every Cherry Festival parade since 1998.

I have participated in both Veteran parades.

I do some volunteering and contribute at various events throughout the last 25 years.

And at a few certain times in my life, I have been known to annoy one or two people in my lifetime (just being honest).

Additional Information
Resume Field not completed.

Additional Information Field not completed.

Email not displaying correctly? View it in your browser.

1 Nicole Wheelwright
From:[email protected]
Sent:Wednesday, December 7, 2022 8:40 PM
To:Nicole Wheelwright
Subject:Online Form Submittal: Planning Commission Appointment 2022 Categories:Print
Planning Commission Appointment 2022

Applications to fill the vacant seats of the Beaumont Planning Commission will be accepted through Thursday, December 8, 2022 at 5:00 p.m.

Selection process will be held during the City Council Meeting of December 20, 2022 at 6:00 p.m.

First Name Steve
Last Name Cooley
Primary Phone
Alternate Phone
Home Address
Address 2 Field not completed.

Email
Occupation/Profession retired forensic accountant
Employer Name Field not completed.

Are you 18 years of age or
older?
Yes
Are you a resident in the
City of Beaumont?
Yes
Questions
Please answer the following questions which are intended to assist the City Council in assessing your qualifications and experience for the Planning Commission vacancy.

Are you aware of any
conflicts, financial or
None

2 otherwise, which could
affect your appointment as
a Planning Commissioner?
Briefly state your
qualifications, including any
skills or background related
to City Planning,
development and
building/construction:

While employed by the State of Utah entity that regulated every professional license including contractors, I conducted hundreds of investigations and administrative hearings
applying building codes as well as the codes relating to professional conduct. As a result I became very knowledgeable of various building codes including the models.

I worked for several years with a large commercial property developer who owned and operated most of the shopping malls in the Intermountain West. In addition to ensuring that building codes were adhered to, I worked to develop pleasant and workable shopping communities. While these shopping malls were not cities, they served thousands of citizens on a daily basis. My team insured that the needs of the public as well as the tenants were met and strived to exceed expectations.

Some of the centers included residential housing and services.

My team developed, built and operated a temporary housing facility that housed the construction crew that built a natural gas processing plant in rural Wyoming . The facility took nearly 5 years to complete. The facility provided all community services including housing, public safety, food services and recreation opportunities.

For the past 5 years I have chaired the Architectural Review Committee for Four Seasons Beaumont HOA. A large part of my responsibilities included knowing and applying the City's building codes and the HOA rules. In many instances my team was responsible for ensuring that the community plans were applied as well as developing processes and tweaking areas to more fully develop the existing community.

I have a MBA which included some City Planning and
Development course work. I have a working knowledge of City Planning concepts and practices including excellent financial skills in budgeting and grant writing and compliance.

What would your vision for
Beaumont’s future?
Beaumont City is a mix of residents some of whom would like to maintain their rural community in which they grew up.

However the City has grown to meet the needs of people who moved here for affordable housing and available employment.

The City must work to find a common ground with both these groups. With in that arena the City must develop adequate