Agenda packet — Beaumont City Council, March 7, 2023 (part 5 of 6)

Roof Runoff
Roof downspouts may be directed towards Bioretention Facilities. However, the downspouts must discharge onto a concrete splash block to protect the Bioretention Facility from erosion.

Retaining Walls
It is recommended that Retaining Wall Type 1A, per Caltrans Standard B3‐3 or equivalent, be constructed around the entire perimeter of the Bioretention Facility. This practice will protect the sides of the Bioretention Facility from collapsing during construction and maintenance or from high service loads adjacent to the BMP. Where such service loads would not exist adjacent to the BMP, an engineered alternative may be used if signed by a licensed civil engineer.

Side Slope Requirements

Bioretention Facilities Requiring Side Slopes
The design should assure that the Bioretention Facility does not present a tripping hazard.

Bioretention Facilities proposed near pedestrian areas, such as areas parallel to parking spaces or along a walkway, must have a gentle slope to the bottom of the facility. Side slopes inside of a Bioretention Facility shall be 4:1. A typical cross section for the Bioretention Facility is shown in Figure 1.

Bioretention Facilities Not Requiring Side Slopes
Where cars park perpendicular to the Bioretention Facility, side slopes are not required. A 6‐ inch maximum drop may be used, and the Bioretention Facility must be planted with trees and shrubs to prevent pedestrian access. In this case, a curb is not placed around the Bioretention Facility,
but wheel stops shall be used to prevent vehicles from entering the Bioretention Facility, as shown in Figure 4.

Figure 4: Bioretention Facility Layout without Side Slopes

Page 583 of 1234 ends

BIORETENTION FACILITY BMP FACT SHEET

Riverside County - Low Impact Development BMP Design Handbook rev. 2/2012

Page 6 ends

Planter Boxes
Bioretention Facilities can also be placed above ground as planter boxes. Planter boxes must have a minimum width of 2 feet, a maximum surcharge depth of 6 inches, and no side slopes are necessary. Planter boxes must be constructed so as to ensure that the top surface of the engineered soil media will remain level. This option may be constructed of concrete, brick, stone or other stable materials that will not warp or bend. Chemically treated wood or galvanized steel, which has the ability to contaminate stormwater, should not be used. Planter boxes must be lined with an impermeable liner on all sides, including the bottom. Due to the impermeable liner, the inside bottom of the planter box shall be designed and constructed with a cross fall, directing treated flows within the subdrain layer toward the point where subdrain exits the planter box, and subdrains shall be oriented with drain holes oriented down. These provisions will help avoid excessive stagnant water within the gravel underdrain layer. Similar to the in‐ground Bioretention Facility versions, this BMP benefits from healthy plants and biological activity in the root zone. Planter boxes should be planted with appropriately selected vegetation.

Figure 5: Planter Box
Source: LA Team Effort
Overflow
An overflow route is needed in the Bioretention Facility design to bypass stored runoff from storm events larger than VBMP or in the event of facility or subdrain clogging. Overflow systems must connect to an acceptable discharge point, such as a downstream conveyance system as shown in Figure 1 and Figure 4. The inlet to the overflow structure shall be elevated inside the Bioretention Facility to be flush with the ponding surface for the design capture volume (VBMP) as shown in Figure 4. This will allow the design capture volume to be fully treated by the Bioretention Facility, and for larger events to safely be conveyed to downstream systems. The overflow inlet shall not be located in the entrance of a Bioretention Facility, as shown in Figure

Page 584 of 1234 ends

BIORETENTION FACILITY BMP FACT SHEET

Riverside County - Low Impact Development BMP Design Handbook rev. 2/2012

Page 7 ends

Underdrain Gravel and Pipes
An underdrain gravel layer and pipes shall be provided in accordance with Appendix B – Underdrains.

Figure 6: Incorrect Placement of an Overflow Inlet.

Inspection and Maintenance Schedule
The Bioretention Facility area shall be inspected for erosion, dead vegetation, soggy soils, or standing water. The use of fertilizers and pesticides on the plants inside the Bioretention Facility should be minimized.

Schedule Activity
Ongoing
 Keep adjacent landscape areas maintained. Remove clippings from landscape maintenance activities.
 Remove trash and debris
 Replace damaged grass and/or plants
 Replace surface mulch layer as needed to maintain a 2‐3 inch soil cover.

After storm events  Inspect areas for ponding
Annually  Inspect/clean inlets and outlets

Page 585 of 1234 ends

Riverside County - Low Impact Development BMP Design Handbook rev. 2/2012

Page 8 ends

Bioretention Facility Design Procedure

1) Enter the area tributary, AT, to the Bioretention Facility.

2) Enter the Design Volume, VBMP, determined from Section 2.1 of this Handbook.

3) Select the type of design used. There are two types of Bioretention Facility designs: the standard design used for most project sites that include side slopes, and the modified design used when the BMP is located perpendicular to the parking spaces or with planter boxes that do not use side slopes.

4) Enter the depth of the engineered soil media, dS. The minimum depth for the engineered soil media can be 18' in limited cases, but it is recommended to use 24' or a preferred 36' to provide an adequate root zone for the chosen plant palette. Engineered soil media deeper than 36' will only get credit for the pore space in the first 36'.

5) Enter the top width of the Bioretention Facility.

6) Calculate the total effective depth, dE, within the Bioretention Facility. The maximum allowable pore space of the soil media is 30% while the maximum allowable pore space for the gravel layer is 40%. Gravel layer deeper than 12' will only get credit for the pore space in the first 12'.

a. For the design with side slopes the following equation shall be used to determine the total effective depth. Where, dP is the depth of ponding within the basin. d୉ ሺftሻ ൌ

0.3 ൈ ቂ൫w୘ ሺftሻ ൈdୗ ሺftሻ൯൅4൫d୔ ሺftሻ൯ଶ ቃ ൅ 0.4 ൈ 1
ሺftሻ ൅d୔ ሺftሻൣ4d୔ ሺftሻ ൅൫w୘ ሺftሻ െ8d୔ ሺftሻ൯൧
w୘ ሺftሻ
This above equation can be simplified if the maximum ponding depth of 0.5’ is used. The equation below is used on the worksheet to find the minimum area required for the Bioretention Facility:
d୉ ሺftሻ ൌ ሺ0.3 ൈ dୗ ሺftሻ ൅ 0.4 x 1ሺftሻ
ሻ െቆ0.7 ሺft ଶ ሻ
w୘ ሺftሻ ቇ൅0.5ሺftሻ

Page 586 of 1234 ends

Riverside County - Low Impact Development BMP Design Handbook rev. 2/2012

Page 9 ends

b. For the design without side slopes the following equation shall be used to determine the total effective depth:
d୉ ሺftሻ ൌd୔ ሺftሻ ൅ ሾሺ0.3ሻ ൈdୗ ሺftሻ ൅ ሺ0.4ሻ ൈ1ሺftሻሿ

The equation below, using the maximum ponding depth of 0.5', is used on the worksheet to find the minimum area required for the Bioretention Facility:

d୉ ሺftሻ ൌ0.5 ሺftሻ ൅ ሾሺ0.3ሻ ൈdୗ ሺftሻ ൅ ሺ0.4ሻ ൈ1ሺftሻሿ

7) Calculate the minimum surface area, AM, required for the Bioretention Facility. This does not include the curb surrounding the Bioretention Facility or side slopes.

A୑ ሺft ଶ ሻ ൌ V୆୑୔ሺftଷ ሻ
d୉ ሺftሻ

8) Enter the proposed surface area. This area shall not be less than the minimum required surface area.

9) Verify that side slopes are no steeper than 4:1 in the standard design, and are not required in the modified design.

10) Provide the diameter, minimum 6 inches, of the perforated underdrain used in the Bioretention Facility. See Appendix B for specific information regarding perforated pipes.

11) Provide the slope of the site around the Bioretention Facility, if used. The maximum slope is 3 percent for a standard design.

12) Provide the check dam spacing, if the site around the Bioretention Facility is sloped.

13) Describe the vegetation used within the Bioretention Facility.

Page 587 of 1234 ends

Riverside County - Low Impact Development BMP Design Handbook rev. 2/2012

Page 10 ends

References Used to Develop this Fact Sheet
Anderson, Dale V. "Landscaped Filter Basin Soil Requirements." Riverside, May 2010.

California Department of Transportation. CalTrans Standard Plans. 15 September 2005. May 2010 http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/esc/oe/project_plans/HTM/stdplns‐ met‐new99.htm>.

Camp Dresser and McKee Inc.; Larry Walker Associates. California Stormwater Best Management Practice Handbook for New Development and Redevelopment. California Stormwater Quality Association (CASQA), 2004.

Contra Costa Clean Water Program. Stormwater Quality Requirements for Development Applications. 3rd Edition. Contra Costa, 2006.

County of Los Angeles Public Works. Stormwater Best Management Practice Design and Maintenance Manual. Los Angeles, 2009.

Kim, Hunho, Eric A. Seagren and Allen P. Davis. "Engineered Bioretention for Removal of Nitrate from Stormwater Runoff." Water Environment Research 75.4 (2003): 355‐366.

LA Team Effort. LA Team Effort: FREE Planter Boxes for Businesses. 2 November 2009. May 2010 http://lateameffort.blogspot.com/2009/11/free‐ planter‐boxes‐for‐businesses‐est.html>.

Montgomery County Maryland Department of Permitting Services Water Resources Section.

Biofiltration (BF). Montgomery County, 2005.

Program, Ventura Countywide Stormwater Quality Management. Technical Guidance Manual for Stormwater Quality Control Measures. Ventura, 2002.

United States Environmental Protection Agency. Storm Water Technology Fact Sheet Bioretention. Washington D.C, 1999.

Urban Drainage and Flood Control District. Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manual Volume 3 ‐ Best Management Practices. Vol. 3. Denver, 2008. 3 vols.

Urbonas, Ben R. Stormwater Sand Filter Sizing and Design: A Unit Operations Approach. Denver:

Urban Drainage and Flood Control District, 2002.

Page 588 of 1234 ends

Page 589 of 1234 ends

Page 590 of 1234 ends

Page 591 of 1234 ends

Page 592 of 1234 ends

Page 593 of 1234 ends

Page 594 of 1234 ends

Page 595 of 1234 ends

Page 596 of 1234 ends

Page 597 of 1234 ends

Page 598 of 1234 ends

Page 599 of 1234 ends

Page 600 of 1234 ends

Page 601 of 1234 ends

Page 602 of 1234 ends

Page 603 of 1234 ends

Page 604 of 1234 ends

Page 605 of 1234 ends

Page 606 of 1234 ends

Page 607 of 1234 ends

Page 608 of 1234 ends

Page 609 of 1234 ends

Page 610 of 1234 ends

Page 611 of 1234 ends

Page 612 of 1234 ends

Staff Report

TO: City Council
FROM: Jennifer Ustation, Finance Director
DATE March 7, 2023
SUBJECT: First Amendment to the Professional Services Agreement for Rogers, Anderson, Malody & Scott, LLP for Professional Auditing Services

Description Amendment to extend the term of the contract for one (1) year and increased labor costs.

Background and Analysis:

On June 3, 2020, City Council approved a three (3) year Professional Services Agreement (PSA) with Rogers, Anderson, Malody & Scott, LLP (RAMS) to provide Professional Auditing Services (Attachment A).

The contract is currently in the third year of the agreement. RAMS has requested an increase for the first option year of approximately 15% or $7,600 due to increased labor costs. City staff requested quotes from other firms to make sure the request was reasonable within industry standards. The responses were within RAMS requested amount and have been included as Attachment C.

Two (2) additional contract term extensions of one year each, may be awarded by City Council per the original contract. City staff is requesting the approval of a one-year extension through June 30, 2024. Per Beaumont Municipal Code 3.02.070, the term of a professional services contract shall be a maximum of five years.

Fiscal Impact:

The increase to the contract will be budgeted in FY2023 -2024. For any services performed this fiscal year, there is sufficient budget in the Finance Department contractual service line item 100-1225-7068-0000.

Recommended Action:

Approve the First Amendment to the Professional Services Agreement with Rogers, Anderson, Malody & Scott, LLP for the first option year in an amount not to exceed $55,800 for auditing services.

Page 613 of 1234 ends

Attachments:

A. Professional Services Agreement (PSA) with Rogers, Anderson, Malody & Scott, LLP dated June 3, 2020.

B. First Amendment to Professional Services Agreement
C. Quotes for Auditing Services

Page 614 of 1234 ends

AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BY INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR

THIS AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BY INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR is made and effective as of the 3r1 day of June, 2020, by and between the CITY OF BEAUMONT ("CITY") whose address is 550 E. 6th Street, Beaumont, California 92223 and Rogers, Anderson, Malody & Scott, LLP whose address is 735 E. Carnegie Drive, Suite 100 San Bernardino, CA 92408 ("CONTRACTOR").

RECITALS
This Agreement is entered into on the basis of the following facts, understandings and intentions of the parties to this Agreement:

A. CITY desires to engage CONTRACTOR to provide independent audit services; and
B. CONTRACTOR has made a proposal ("Proposal") to the CITY to provide such professional services, which Proposal is attached hereto as Exhibit "A"; and C. CONTRACTOR agrees to provide such services pursuant to, and in accordance with, the terms and conditions of this Agreement, and represents and warrants to CITY that CONTRACTOR possesses the necessary skills, licenses, certifications, qualifications, personnel and equipment to provide such services.

AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing Recitals and mutual covenants contained herein, CITY and CONTRACTOR agree as follows:

1. Term of Agreement. This Agreement is effective as of the date first above written and shall continue until terminated as provided for herein. Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, this Agreement shall continue for (3) one-year periods, with an option to extended for (2) one year periods by the parties with the approval of the City Council of the CITY.

2. Services to be Performed. CONTRACTOR agrees to provide the services Services") as set forth in Exhibit "B" hereto ("Engagement Letter") and any other services which the City may request in writing. All Services shall be performed in the manner and according to the timeframe set forth in the Proposal. CONTRACTOR designates Scott W. Manno, CPA, CGMA as CONTRACTOR'S professional responsible for overseeing the Services provided by CONTRACTOR.

3. Associates and Subcontractors. CONTRACTOR may, at CONTRACTOR's sole cost and expense, employ such competent and qualified independent associates, subcontractors and consultants as CONTRACTOR deems necessary to perform the Services; provided, however, that CONTRACTOR shall not subcontract any of the Services without the written consent of CITY.
1

Page 615 of 1234 ends

4. Compensation.

4.01 CONTRACTOR shall be paid at the rates set forth in the Engagement Letter in an amount not to exceed $46,200 for the year ending June 30, 2020 and does not include work to be performed under a Single Audit pursuant to the Federal Single Audit Act, which would be subject to a separate engagement letter if required and as addressed more fully in Exhibit "B" hereto.

4.02 CONTRACTOR shall not be compensated for any Services rendered nor reimbursed for any expenses incurred in excess of those authorized unless approved in advance by the CITY, in writing.

4.03 CONTRACTOR shall submit to CITY, on or before the fifteenth (15th) of each month, itemized invoices for the Services rendered in the previous month. The CITY shall not be obligated to pay any invoice that is submitted more than sixty (60) days after the due date of such invoice. CITY shall have the right to review and audit all invoices prior to or after payment to CONTRACTOR. This review and audit may include, but not be limited to CITY's:
a. Determination that any hourly fee charged is consistent with this Agreement's approved hourly rate schedule;
b. Determination that the multiplication of the hours billed times the approved rate schedule dollars is correct;
c. Determination that each item charged is the usual, customary, and reasonable charge for the particular item. If CITY determines an item charged is greater than usual, customary, or reasonable, or is duplicative, ambiguous, excessive, or inappropriate, CITY shall either return the bill to CONTRACTOR with a request for explanation or adjust the payment accordingly and give notice to CONTRACTOR of the adjustment.

4.04 If the work is satisfactorily completed, CITY shall pay such invoice within thirty (30) days of its receipt. Should CITY dispute any portion of any invoice, CITY shall pay the undisputed portion within the time stated above, and at the same time advise CONTRACTOR in writing of the disputed portion.

5. Oblications of CONTRACTOR.

5.01 CONTRACTOR agrees to perform all Services in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement (including the Proposal and the Engagement Letter). In the event that the terms of the Proposal shall conflict with the terms of this Agreement, or contain additional terms other than the Services to be rendered and the price for the Services, the terms of the Engagement Letter shall govern and said additional or conflicting terms shall be of no force or effect.

5.02 Except as otherwise agreed by the parties, CONTRACTOR will supply all personnel, materials and equipment required to perform the Services. CONTRACTOR 2

Page 616 of 1234 ends

shall provide its own offices, telephones, vehicles and computers and set its own work hours. CONTRACTOR will determine the method, details, and means of performing the Services under this Agreement.

5.03 CONTRACTOR shall keep CITY informed as to the progress of the Services by means of regular and frequent consultations. Additionally, when requested by CITY, CONTRACTOR shall prepare written status reports.

5.04 CONTRACTOR is responsible for paying, when due, all income and other taxes, fees and withholding, including withholding state and federal taxes, social security, unemployment and worker's compensation, incurred as a result of the compensation paid under this Agreement. CONTRACTOR agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless CITY for any claims, costs, losses, fees, penalties, interest, or damages suffered by CITY resulting from CONTRACTOR's failure to comply with this provision.

5.05 In the event CONTRACTOR is required to prepare plans, drawings, specifications and/or estimates, the same shall be furnished in conformance with local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations.

5.06 CONTRACTOR represents that it possesses all required licenses necessary or applicable to the performance of Services under this Agreement and the Proposal and shall obtain and keep in full force and effect all permits and approvals required to perform the Services herein. In the event CITY is required to obtain an approval or permit from another governmental entity, CONTRACTOR shall provide all necessary supporting documents to be filed with such entity.

5.07 CONTRACTOR shall be solely responsible for obtaining Employment Eligibility Verification information from CONTRACTOR's employees, in compliance with the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986, Pub. L. 99-603 (8 U.S.C. 1324a), and shall ensure that CONTRACTOR's employees are eligible to work in the United States.

5.08 In the event that CONTRACTOR employs, contracts with, or otherwise utilizes any CalPers retirees in completing any of the Services performed hereunder, such instances shall be disclosed in advance to the CITY and shall be subject to the CITY's advance written approval.

5.09 Drug-free Workplace Certification. By signing this Agreement, the CONTRACTOR hereby certifies under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the CONTRACTOR will comply with the requirements of the Drug -Free Workplace Act of 1990 (Government Code, Section 8350 et seq.) and will provide a drug- free workplace.

5.10 CONTRACTOR shall comply with all applicable local, state and federal laws, rules, regulations, entitlements and/or permits applicable to, or governing the Services authorized hereunder.

6. Insurance. CONTRACTOR hereby agrees to be solely responsible for the health 3

Page 617 of 1234 ends

and safety of its employees and agents in performing the Services under this Agreement and shall comply with all laws applicable to worker safety including but not limited to Cal -OSHA.

Therefore, throughout the duration of this Agreement, CONTRACTOR hereby covenants and agrees to maintain insurance in conformance with the requirements set forth below. Attached hereto as Exhibit "C" are copies of Certificates of Insurance and endorsements as required by Section 7.02. If existing coverage does not meet the requirements set forth herein, CONTRACTOR agrees to amend, supplement or endorse the existing coverage to do so.

CONTRACTOR shall provide the following types and amounts of insurance:

6.01 Commercial general liability insurance in an amount of not less than 1,000,000 per occurrence and $2,000,000 in the aggregate; CONTRACTOR agrees to have its insurer endorse the general liability coverage required herein to include as additional insured's CITY, its officials, employees and agents. CONTRACTOR also agrees to require all contractors and subcontractors to provide the same coverage required under this Section 6.

6.02 Business Auto Coverage in an amount no less than $1 million per accident.

If CONTRACTOR or CONTRACTOR's employees will use personal autos in performance of the Services hereunder, CONTRACTOR shall provide evidence of personal auto liability coverage for each such person.

6.03 Workers' Compensation coverage for any of CONTRACTOR's employees that will be providing any Services hereunder. CONTRACTOR will have a state -approved policy form providing statutory benefits as required by California law. The provisions of any workers' compensation will not limit the obligations of CONTRACTOR under this Agreement. CONTRACTOR expressly agrees not to use any statutory immunity defenses under such laws with respect to CITY, its employees, officials and agents.

6.04 Optional Insurance Coverage. Choose and check one: Required X_ /Not Required ; Errors and omissions insurance in a minimum amount of $2 million per occurrence to cover any negligent acts or omissions committed by CONTRACTOR, its employees and/or agents in the performance of any Services for CITY.

7. General Conditions pertaining to Insurance Coverage

7.01 No liability insurance coverage provided shall prohibit CONTRACTOR from waiving the right of subrogation prior to a loss. CONTRACTOR waives all rights of subrogation against CITY regardless of the applicability of insurance proceeds and shall require all contractors and subcontractors to do likewise.

7.02. Prior to beginning the Services under this Agreement, CONTRACTOR shall furnish CITY with certificates of insurance, endorsements, and upon request, complete copies of all policies, including complete copies of all endorsements. All copies of policies and endorsements shall show the signature of a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf.

7.03. All required policies shall be issued by a highly rated insurer with a minimum A.M. Best rating of "A:VII"). The insurer(s) shall be admitted and licensed to do business 4

Page 618 of 1234 ends

in California. The certificates of insurance hereunder shall state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided, canceled by either party, or reduced in coverage or in limits, except after thirty (30) days' prior written notice has been given to CITY.

7.04 Self-insurance does not comply with these insurance specifications.

CONTRACTOR acknowledges and agrees that that all insurance coverage required to be provided by CONTRACTOR or any subcontractor, shall apply first and on a primary, non- contributing basis in relation to any other insurance, indemnity or self-insurance available to CITY.

7.05 All coverage types and limits required are subject to approval, modification and additional requirements by CITY, as the need arises. CONTRACTOR shall not make any reductions in scope of coverage (e.g. elimination of contractual liability or reduction of discovery period) that may affect CITY's protection without CITY's prior written consent.

7.06 CONTRACTOR agrees to provide immediate notice to CITY of any claim or loss against CONTRACTOR or arising out of the Services performed under this Agreement. CITY assumes no obligation or liability by such notice but has the right (but not the duty) to monitor the handling of any such claim or claims if they are likely to involve CITY.

8. Indemnification.

Accordingly, the provisions of this indemnity are intended by the parties to be interpreted and construed to provide the fullest protection possible under the law to CITY.

CONTRACTOR acknowledges that CITY would not enter into this Agreement in the absence of the commitment of CONTRACTOR to indemnify and protect CITY as set forth herein.
a. To the fullest extent permitted by law, CONTRACTOR shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless CITY, its employees, agents and officials, from any liability, claims, suits, actions, arbitration proceedings, administrative proceedings, regulatory proceedings, losses, expenses, damages or costs of any kind, whether actual, alleged or threatened, actual attorneys' fees incurred by CITY, court costs, interest, defense costs, including expert witness fees and any other costs or expenses of any kind whatsoever without restriction or limitation incurred in relation to, as a consequence of or arising out of, or in any way attributable actually, allegedly or impliedly, in whole or in part to the performance of this Agreement.

CONTRACTOR's obligation to defend, indemnify and hold harmless shall include any and all claims, suits and proceedings in which CONTRACTOR (and/or CONTRACTOR's agents and/or employees) is alleged to be an employee of CITY.

All obligations under this provision are to be paid by CONTRACTOR as they are 5

Page 619 of 1234 ends

incurred by CITY.
b. Without affecting the rights of CITY under any provision of this Agreement or this Section, CONTRACTOR shall not be required to indemnify and hold harmless CITY as set forth above for liability attributable solely to the fault of CITY, provided such fault is determined by agreement between the parties or the findings of a court of competent jurisdiction.

9. Additional Services, Changes and Deletions.

CONTRACTOR expressly waives any right to be compensated for services and materials not covered by the scope of this Agreement or authorized by the CITY in writing.

9.02 CONTRACTOR shall promptly advise the City Manager and Finance Director of CITY as soon as reasonably practicable upon gaining knowledge of a condition, event or accumulation of events which may affect the scope and/or cost of Services. All proposed changes, modifications, deletions and/or requests for additional services shall be reduced to writing for review and approval by the CITY and/or City Council.

10. Termination of Agreement.

10.01 Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, CITY, at its sole option, may terminate this Agreement with or without cause, or for no cause, at any time by giving twenty (20) days' written notice to CONTRACTOR.

Immediately upon termination, CONTRACTOR agrees to promptly provide and deliver to CITY all original documents, reports, studies, plans, specifications and the like which are in the possession or control of CONTRACTOR and pertain to CITY.

11. Status of CONTRACTOR.

11.01 CONTRACTOR shall perform the Services in CONTRACTOR's own way as an independent contractor, and in pursuit of CONTRACTOR' s independent calling, and not as an employee of CITY. However, CONTRACTOR shall regularly confer with CITY's City Manager as provided for in this Agreement.

11.02 CONTRACTOR agrees that it is not entitled to the rights and benefits afforded to CITY's employees, including disability or unemployment insurance, workers' compensation, retirement, CalPers, medical insurance, sick leave, or any other employment benefit. CONTRACTOR is responsible for providing, at its own expense, disability, unemployment, workers' compensation and other insurance, training, permits, and licenses for itself and its employees and subcontractors.
6

Page 620 of 1234 ends

11.03 CONTRACTOR hereby specifically represents and warrants to CITY that it possesses the qualifications and skills necessary to perform the Services under this Agreement in a competent, professional manner, without the advice or direction of CITY and that the Services to be rendered pursuant to this Agreement shall be performed in accordance with the standards customarily applicable to an experienced and competent professional rendering the same or similar services in the same geographic area where the CITY is located. Further, CONTRACTOR represents and warrants that the individual signing this Agreement on behalf of CONTRACTOR has the full authority to bind CONTRACTOR to this Agreement.

12. Ownership of Documents: Audit.

12.01 All draft and final reports, plans, drawings, studies, maps, photographs, specifications, data, notes, manuals, warranties and all other documents of any kind or nature prepared, developed or obtained by CONTRACTOR in connection with the performance of Services performed for the CITY shall become the sole property of CITY, except those items defined as audit documentation under professional standards promulgated by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA), which will be the property of CONSULTANT and CONTRACTOR shall promptly deliver all such materials to CITY upon request. At the CITY's sole discretion, CONTRACTOR may be permitted to retain original documents, and furnish reproductions to CITY upon request, at no cost to CITY.

12.02 Subject to applicable federal and state laws, rules and regulations, CITY shall hold all intellectual property rights to any materials developed pursuant to this Agreement, except those items defined as audit documentation under professional standards promulgated by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants AICPA), which will be the property of CONSULTANT. CONTRACTOR shall not such use data or documents for purposes other than the performance of this Agreement, nor shall CONTRACTOR release, reproduce, distribute, publish, adapt for future use or any other purposes, or otherwise use, any data or other materials first produced in the performance of this Agreement, nor authorize others to do so, without the prior written consent of CITY.

12.03 CONTRACTOR shall retain and maintain, for a period not less than four years following termination of this Agreement, all-time records, accounting records and vouchers and all other records with respect to all matters concerning Services performed, compensation paid and expenses reimbursed. At any time during normal business hours and as often as CITY may deem necessary, CONTRACTOR shall make available to CITY's agents for examination all of such records and shall permit CITY's agents to audit, examine and reproduce such records.

13. Miscellaneous Provisions.

13.01 This Agreement, which includes all attached exhibits, supersedes any and all previous agreements, either oral or written, between the parties hereto with respect to the rendering of Services by CONTRACTOR for CITY and contains all of the covenants and agreements between the parties with respect to the rendering of such Services in any 7

Page 621 of 1234 ends

manner whatsoever. Any modification of this Agreement will be effective only if it is in writing signed by both parties.

13.02 CONTRACTOR shall not assign or otherwise transfer any rights or interest in this Agreement without the prior written consent of CITY. Unless specifically stated to the contrary in any written consent to an assignment, no assignment will release or discharge the assignor from any duty or responsibility under this Agreement.

13.03 CONTRACTOR shall timely file FPPC Form 700 Conflict of Interest Statements with CITY if required by California law and/or the CITY's conflict of interest policy.

13.04 If any legal action or proceeding, including an action for declaratory relief, is brought to enforce or interpret the provisions of this Agreement, the prevailing party will be entitled to reasonable attorneys' fees and costs, in addition to any other relief to which that party may be entitled.

13.05 This Agreement is made, entered into and shall be performed in the County of Riverside in the State of California and shall in all respects be interpreted, enforced and governed under the laws of the State of California.

13.06 CONTRACTOR covenants that neither it nor any officer or principal of its firm has any interest, nor shall they acquire any interest, either directly or indirectly, which will conflict in any manner or degree with the performance of their Services hereunder.

CONTRACTOR further covenants that in the performance of this Agreement, no person having such interest shall be employed by it as an officer, employee, agent, or subcontractor.

13.07 CONTRACTOR has read and is aware of the provisions of Section 1090 et seq. and Section 87100 et seq. of the Government Code relating to conflicts of interest of public officers and employees. CONTRACTOR agrees that they are unaware of any financial or economic interest of any public officer or employee of the CITY relating to this Agreement. It is further understood and agreed that if such a financial interest does exist at the inception of this Agreement, the CITY may immediately terminate this Agreement by giving notice thereof. CONTRACTOR shall comply with the requirements of Government Code section 87100 et seq. and section 1090 in the performance of and during the term of this Agreement.

13.08 Improper Consideration. CONTRACTOR shall not offer (either directly or through an intermediary) any improper consideration such as, but not limited to, cash, discounts, services, the provision of travel or entertainment, or any items of value to any officer, employee or agent of the CITY in an attempt to secure favorable treatment regarding this Agreement or any contract awarded by CITY. The CITY, by notice, may immediately terminate this Agreement if it determines that any improper consideration as described in the preceding sentence was offered to any officer, employee or agent of the CITY with respect to the proposal and award process of this Agreement or any CITY contract. This prohibition shall apply to any amendment, extension or evaluation process once this Agreement or any CITY contract has been awarded. CONTRACTOR shall 8

Page 622 of 1234 ends

immediately report any attempt by any CITY officer, employee or agent to solicit (either directly or through an intermediary) improper consideration from CONTRACTOR.

13.09 Severability. If any portion of this Agreement is declared invalid, illegal or otherwise unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the entire balance of this Agreement not so affected shall remain in full force and effect.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereby have made and executed this Agreement to be effective as of the day and year first above -written.

CITY:

CITY OF BEAU
By: By:
ey Santos„ Mayor
CONTRACTOR:
9 Print Name: St: ed. / Gw•
Title:C.t.

Page 623 of 1234 ends

EXHIBIT "A"

PROPOSAL
insert behind this page)

Page 624 of 1234 ends

CITY OF BEAUMONT
550 E. Sixth Street, Beaumont, CA 92223
BEAM T Phone: (951) 572-3236 Fax: (951) 769-8526
C A L I F O R N 1 4 -

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL

PROFESSIONAL AUDITING SERVICES

CITY OF BEAUMONT

FINANCE DEPARTMENT
Jeff Mohlenkamp, Director of Finance
550 E. 6th Street - Beaumont, California 92223
951) 572-3236
e-mail address: [email protected]
Proposals Due By:
12:00 Noon
Friday, April 3, 2020
RFP Available online at:

Public Purchase, CSMFO, GFOA and
www.ci.beaumont.ca.us
Item 10.
310

Page 625 of 1234 ends

Table of Contents
Request for Proposal
Introduction 2
Background 2
Project Schedule 2
Response Submittal 4
General Requirements 4
Proposal Requirements 5
Overview and Scope of Services 6
Selection Process 6
Attachment
Contract Services Agreement 8-16
Attachment!!
Contract Services Agreement 17-20
Attachment!!!
Cost Summary 21
Request for Proposal for Professional Auditing Services

Page 1 ends

Item 10.
a
311

Page 626 of 1234 ends

CITY OF BEAUMONT

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL

PROFESSIONAL AUDITING SERVICES

INTRODUCTION
Item 10.

The City of Beaumont is requesting qualified public accounting firms to submit proposals to audit the City's financial statements for the three (3) fiscal years beginning with the year ending June 30, 2020, with the option of extending the contract for two (2) additional one-year periods, at the City's sole discretion. These audits are to be performed in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, Governmental Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, and U.S.

Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-133 Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non -Profit Organizations. Additional information is found in the Scopes of Services (Attachment II).

Background Information
The City of Beaumont is a general law city incorporated in 1912 currently serving a population of approximately 49,000, located in Western Riverside County. The City operates under a council-manager format of government which consists of a Mayor, Mayor Pro -Tem, three Councilmembers and the City Manager. The positions of Mayor and Mayor Pro -Tem are rotated among the elected Councilmembers.

A City Clerk and Treasurer are elected positions, each for a four-year term.

In addition to its function as the governing body of the City, the City Council acts as the governing body for other separate entities: Beaumont Financing Authority, Beaumont Transit System, and Beaumont Utility Authority. The City's management also has custodial, accounting and financial reporting responsibilities for the Successor Agency to the City of Beaumont Redevelopment Agency. There is no requirement for separate financial reporting for these separate entities with one exception (Beaumont Transit System).

Official accounting records are on-site in the Finance Department, while some supporting information may be located in other departments within the City. Beaumont uses the Tyler Incode 10 accounting software and Tyler Incode 9 centralized cashiering system for receipts and sewer utility billing. Payroll is processed through Paychex. We are in the process of upgrading the cashiering system to Incode 10 and should be complete by June 30, 2020.

Relevant operational detail for conducting the independent financial audit is provided as follows:

1. The Finance Department consists of the Finance Director, and five (5) staff members responsible for accounting and financial reporting, budgeting, payroll, accounts payable, revenue recording, banking and treasury investment, purchase order and project accounting tracking. Revenues are collected at various locations throughout the City and recorded into Tyler Incode 9 by non - finance department personnel.

Request for Proposal for Professional Auditing Services

Page 2 ends

312

Page 627 of 1234 ends

Item 10.

2. City Funds and Account Groups are as follows:
a. General Fund (1)
b. Internal Service Funds (2)
c. Special Revenue Funds (9)
d. Debt Service Fund (1)
e. Capital Project Funds (17)
f. Enterprise Funds (7)
g. Agency Funds (4)

3. The City, organized into eight departments (Administration, Finance and Budget, IT, Risk and Human Resources, Community Development, Community Services, Public Safety, Public Works), provides a full range of municipal services. In addition, the City has component units including the Successor Agency, Beaumont Utility Authority, Beaumont Financing Authority, and Beaumont Transit System. Public Safety Fire services are contracted with Cal Fire, but Animal Control, Code Enforcement, Police and Dispatch are performed by City employees.

4. The City's total expected payroll for the year ended June 30, 2020 is approximately $18 million, covering 143 budgeted full-time and part-time positions. The total municipal budget for the 2019-20 fiscal year is approximately $60 million.

For further information, City's past two years AFRs' and current and last year adopted budget are located on the City's website at: https://beaumontca.gov/921/Audits-and-Reports The PUN Group, LLC served as the City's auditor in the past years.

Proiect Schedule
RFP Issued Friday, March 6, 2020
Questions Due Friday, March 20, 2020
Responses to questions provided by Friday, March 27, 2020 Submittals Due Friday, April 3, 2020, 12:00 p.m.

Staff Review April 6, 2020 to April 10, 2020
Presentations/Interview Week of April 20,2020
City Council review/approval Tuesday, May 19, 2020
Implementation begins Monday, July 06, 2020 ,
Request for Proposal for Professional Auditing Services

Page 3 ends

313

Page 628 of 1234 ends

Item 10.

Response Submittal
Interested firms shall submit three (3) copies of the proposal no later than Aura 3, 2020 at 12:OOp.m.

No late submittals will be accepted. "City of Beaumont 2020 Professional Auditing Services RFP" must be clearly marked on the outside of the envelope:

Submit Proposal to:

City of Beaumont
550 E. 6th Street
Beaumont, CA 92223
Additionally, one electronic copy of the proposal shall be sent to finance(aibeaurnontca.gov by 12:OOp.m. on April 3, 2020 for a proposal to be considered.

Any requests for clarification or other questions concerning this RFP must be submitted via email to Lisa Leach (as shown below) no later than March 20, 2020. Responses to all questions will be provided to all know interested parties by March 27, 2020.

Lisa Leach, CPA, Senior Accountant
Email:[email protected]
General Requirements
The City of Beaumont reserves the right to reject any or all responses, to waive any informality in any responses, and to select the vendor that best meets the City's needs.

There is no expressed or implied obligation for the City to reimburse responding firms for any expenses incurred in preparing proposals in response to this request. Materials submitted by respondents are subject to public inspection under the California Public Records Act (Government Code Sec. 6250 et seq.) unless exempt. Any language purporting to render the entire proposal confidential or proprietary will be ineffective and will be disregarded.

All property rights, including publication rights of all reports produced by respondents in connection with services performed under this agreement will be vested in the City. In addition, respondents will not publish or release any of the results of its examination without the express written permission of the City.

Responses must be submitted no later than the date and time stated on this RFP. Responses shall be reviewed and rated as set forth in the Selection Process section of this RFP. The City will then determine which firm best meets the City's requirements.

During the evaluation process, the City reserves the right (where it may serve the City's best interest) to request additional information or clarification from respondents. At the discretion of the City, firms submitting proposals may be requested to make oral presentations as part of the evaluation process.

Request for Proposal for Professional Auditing Services

Page 4 ends

314

Page 629 of 1234 ends

Item 10.

The City reserves the right to retain all proposals submitted and to use any ideas in a proposal regardless of whether the proposal was selected. Submission of a proposal indicates acceptance by the firm of the conditions contained in this Request for Proposals, unless clearly and specifically noted in the proposal as submitted and confirmed in the contract between the City and the firm selected.

The City reserves the right to negotiate final pricing with the most qualified firm. The City may invite selected firms to meet with the evaluation team on or around the week of April 20, 2020, at no additional cost to the City.

The City's standard Contract Services Agreement is included as Attachment I. Upon award of the contract, it is expected that the successful proposer will accept the Agreement terms and conditions "as is" without modification. Any contract modifications are to be stated upfront, at the time of submittal.

Any costs incurred in the preparation of the response, presentation to the City, travel in conjunction with such presentations, or samples of items shall be the responsibility of the respondent. The City assumes no responsibility and no liability for costs incurred by respondents prior to issuance of a contract.

The proposer shall furnish the City with such additional information as the City may reasonably require.

PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS
The City requests responses be organized in a logical format that is relevant to these services. The responses shall also be concise, excluding excessive or irrelevant material.

Personnel - This section shall identify the Partner, Manager, and other key personnel and any subconsultants assigned to the services. Provide information on the training, government auditing experience, and specialized skills of each person.

Compania Background - Firms must provide the following information regarding the organization:

Name
Street Address
City, State, Zip Code
Corporate Structure
State/Country of Incorporation
Website
License #
Contact Information
In addition, please include the size of the firm, the size of the firm's governmental audit staff, and the location of the office from which the work on this engagement will be performed.

Firms should provide an affirmative statement that it is independent of the City as defined by generally accepted auditing standards and the U.S. General Accounting Office's Government Auditing Standards.

Firms should provide an affirmative statement that the firm and all assigned key professional staff are properly licensed to practice in California.

Request for Proposal for Professional Auditing Services

Page 5 ends

315

Page 630 of 1234 ends

Item 10.

Firms shall provide information on the circumstances and status of any disciplinary action taken or pending against the firm with state regulatory bodies or professional organizations, as well as any pending or settled litigation, during the past three years.

Peer Review - Firms shall submit a copy of its most recent quality control review. Quality control reviews older than 3 years will not be considered.

Audit Approach - The proposal should set forth a detailed work plan, including an explanation of the audit methodology for providing the services required in this RFP. Include a proposed timeline for the fiscal year 2019-20 audit.

Specific Expertise Desired —The City has extensive use of Community Facility Districts (CFDs), Development Impact Fees (DIFs) and land secured bond issuances. Direct expertise in these areas is desired. Please provide your experience and knowledge in these areas.

References - For the firm's office that will be assigned responsibility for the audit, provide a list of the most significant engagements performed in the last five years that are similar to the engagement described in this Request for Proposal. Indicate the scope of work, dates, engagement partners, total hours and contact information for the client.

Cost Summary - The Cost Summary should contain, itemized pricing for each of the five potential fiscal years. The total maximum annual price should contain all direct and indirect costs, including out-of- pocket expenses. Please use the Cost Summary (Attachment III) to submit pricing. In your proposal, please indicate any specific costing elements such as footnote disclosures that impact the overall cost, such as preparation of GASB 68 reporting.

The proposal should include the anticipated number of hours and distribution by staff classification. The proposal should also include a schedule of rates by professional staff classifications for audit services and consulting services. Please indicate if your proposal includes a "not to exceed" quote.

Signature - The response shall be signed by an official authorized to bind the firm and shall contain a statement to the effect that the proposal is valid for ninety (90) days.

Overview and Scope of Services
The request for Proposals is for Professional Auditing Services as set forth in Attachment II — Scope of Services.

Selection Process
Staff will review the proposals and make a recommendation to the City Council for review (tentatively scheduled for May 19, 2020). The City intends to evaluate the proposals based upon the data presented in response to the RFP. The following general selection criteria will be used to evaluate each proposal:

Request for Proposal for Professional Auditing Services

Page 6 ends

316

Page 631 of 1234 ends

Item 10.

1. Ability to meet service requirements; understanding the needs and requirements of the City; scope and services offered.

2. Experience, qualifications and knowledge of key personnel; references for similar work completed within the last three years. (Particular emphasis will be placed in the area of customer support.)

3. Proposed pricing.

4. Completeness of responses to the Request for Proposals Request for Proposal for Professional Auditing Services

Page 7 ends

317

Page 632 of 1234 ends

Item 10.

Attachment 1
AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BY INDEPENDENT CONTRACTORError! Bookmark not defined.

THIS AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BY INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR is made and effective as of the day of , 2019, by and between the CITY OF BEAUMONT ("CITY") whose address is 550 E. 6th Street, Beaumont, California 92223 and whose address is
CONTRACTOR").

RECITALS
This Agreement is entered into on the basis of the following facts, understandings and intentions of the parties to this Agreement:

A. CITY desires to engage CONTRACTOR to provide
and
B. CONTRACTOR has made a proposal ("Proposal") to the CITY to provide such professional services, which Proposal is attached hereto as Exhibit "A"; and C. CONTRACTOR agrees to provide such services pursuant to, and in accordance with, the terms and conditions of this Agreement, and represents and warrants to CITY that CONTRACTOR possesses the necessary skills, licenses, certifications, qualifications, personnel and equipment to provide such services.

AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing Recitals and mutual covenants contained herein, CITY and CONTRACTOR agree as follows:

1. Term of ALS I eement. This Agreement is effective as of the date first above written and shall continue until terminated as provided for herein. Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, this Agreement shall automatically terminate after three (3) years unless extended by the parties with the approval of the City Council of the CITY up to an additional two (2) years.

2. Services to be Performed. CONTRACTOR agrees to provide the services ("Services") as follows: per Exhibit "A" and any other services which the City may request in writing. All Services shall be performed in the manner and according to the timeframe set forth in the Proposal. CONTRACTOR designates Ming Guan as CONTRACTOR'S professional responsible for overseeing the Services provided by CONTRACTOR.

Request for Proposal for Professional Auditing Services

Page 8 ends

318

Page 633 of 1234 ends

Item 10.

4. Compensation.

4.01 CONTRACTOR shall be paid at the rates set forth in the Proposal and shall not increase any rate without the prior written consent of the CITY. Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, total fees and charges paid by CITY to CONTRACTOR under this Agreement shall not exceed

4.02 CONTRACTOR shall not be compensated for any Services rendered nor reimbursed for any expenses incurred in excess of those authorized unless approved in advance by the CITY, in writing.

4.03 CONTRACTOR shall submit to CITY, on or before the fifteenth (15t'') of each month, itemized invoices for the Services rendered in the previous month. The CITY shall not be obligated to pay any invoice that is submitted more than sixty (60) days after the due date of such invoice. CITY shall have the right to review and audit all invoices prior to or after payment to CONTRACTOR. This review and audit may include, but not be limited to CITY's:
a. Determination that any hourly fee charged is consistent with this Agreement's approved hourly rate schedule;
b. Determination that the multiplication of the hours billed times the approved rate schedule dollars is correct;
c. Determination that each item charged is the usual, customary, and reasonable charge for the particular item. If CITY determines an item charged is greater than usual, customary, or reasonable, or is duplicative, ambiguous, excessive, or inappropriate, CITY shall either return the bill to CONTRACTOR with a request for explanation or adjust the payment accordingly, and give notice to CONTRACTOR of the adjustment.

4.04 If the work is satisfactorily completed, CITY shall pay such invoice within thirty 30) days of its receipt. Should CITY dispute any portion of any invoice, CITY shall pay the undisputed portion within the time stated above, and at the same time advise CONTRACTOR in writing of the disputed portion.

5. Obligations of CONTRACTOR.

5.01 CONTRACTOR agrees to perform all Services in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement and the Proposal. In the event that the terms of the Proposal shall conflict with the terms of this Agreement, or contain additional terms other than the Services to be rendered and the price for the Services, the terms of this Agreement shall govern and said additional or conflicting terms shall be of no force or effect.

Request for Proposal for Professional Auditing Services

Page 9 ends

319

Page 634 of 1234 ends

Item 10.

5.02 Except as otherwise agreed by the parties, CONTRACTOR will supply all personnel, materials and equipment required to perform the Services. CONTRACTOR shall provide its own offices, telephones, vehicles and computers and set its own work hours.

CONTRACTOR will determine the method, details, and means of performing the Services under this Agreement.

In the event CITY is required to obtain an approval or permit from another governmental entity, CONTRACTOR shall provide all necessary supporting documents to be filed with such entity.

5.10 CONTRACTOR shall comply with all applicable local, state and federal laws, rules, regulations, entitlements and/or permits applicable to, or governing the Services authorized hereunder.

Request for Proposal for Professional Auditing Services

Page 10 ends

320

Page 635 of 1234 ends

Item 10.

6. Insurance. CONTRACTOR hereby agrees to be solely responsible for the health and safety of its employees and agents in performing the Services under this Agreement and shall comply with all laws applicable to worker safety including but not limited to Cal -OSHA. Therefore, throughout the duration of this Agreement, CONTRACTOR hereby covenants and agrees to maintain insurance in conformance with the requirements set forth below. Attached hereto as Exhibit "B" are copies of Certificates of Insurance and endorsements as required by Section 7.02. If existing coverage does not meet the requirements set forth herein, CONTRACTOR agrees to amend, supplement or endorse the existing coverage to do so. CONTRACTOR shall provide the following types and amounts of insurance:

6.01 Commercial general liability insurance in an amount of not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence and $2,000,000 in the aggregate; CONTRACTOR agrees to have its insurer endorse the general liability coverage required herein to include as additional insured's CITY, its officials, employees and agents. CONTRACTOR also agrees to require all contractors and subcontractors to provide the same coverage required under this Section 6.

6.02 Business Auto Coverage in an amount no less than $1 million per accident. If CONTRACTOR or CONTRACTOR's employees will use personal autos in performance of the Services hereunder, CONTRACTOR shall provide evidence of personal auto liability coverage for each such person.

CONTRACTOR expressly agrees not to use any statutory immunity defenses under such laws with respect to CITY, its employees, officials and agents.

6.04 Optional Insurance Coverage. Choose and check one: Required _X_ /Not Required ; Errors and omissions insurance in a minimum amount of $2 million per occurrence to cover any negligent acts or omissions committed by CONTRACTOR, its employees and/or agents in the performance of any Services for CITY.

7. General Conditions pertaining to Insurance Coverage

7.03. All required policies shall be issued by a highly rated insurer with a minimum A M Request for Proposal for Professional Auditing Services

Page 11 ends

321

Page 636 of 1234 ends

Item 10.

Best rating of "A:VII"). The insurer(s) shall be admitted and licensed to do business in California.

The certificates of insurance hereunder shall state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided, canceled by either party, or reduced in coverage or in limits, except after thirty (30) days' prior written notice has been given to CITY.

7.04 Self-insurance does not comply with these insurance specifications.

7.06 CONTRACTOR agrees to provide immediate notice to CITY of any claim or loss against CONTRACTOR or arising out of the Services performed under this Agreement. CITY assumes no obligation or liability by such notice, but has the right (but not the duty) to monitor the handling of any such claim or claims if they are likely to involve CITY.

8. Indemnification.

8.01 CONTRACTOR and CITY agree that CITY, its employees, agents and officials should, to the extent permitted by law, be fully protected from any loss, injury, damage, claim, lawsuit, cost, expense, attorneys' fees, litigation costs, defense costs, court costs or any other costs arising out of or in any way related to the performance of this Agreement by CONTRACTOR or any subcontractor or agent of either as set forth herein. Accordingly, the provisions of this indemnity are intended by the parties to be interpreted and construed to provide the fullest protection possible under the law to CITY. CONTRACTOR acknowledges that CITY would not enter into this Agreement in the absence of the commitment of CONTRACTOR to indemnify and protect CITY as set forth herein.
a. To the fullest extent permitted by law, CONTRACTOR shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless CITY, its employees, agents and officials, from any liability, claims, suits, actions, arbitration proceedings, administrative proceedings, regulatory proceedings, losses, expenses, damages or costs of any kind, whether actual, alleged or threatened, actual attorneys' fees incurred by CITY, court costs, interest, defense costs, including expert witness fees and any other costs or expenses of any kind whatsoever without restriction or limitation incurred in relation to, as a consequence of or arising out of, or in any way attributable actually, allegedly or impliedly, in whole or in part to the performance of this Agreement. CONTRACTOR's obligation to defend, indemnify and hold harmless shall include any and all claims, suits and proceedings in which CONTRACTOR (and/or CONTRACTOR's agents and/or employees) is alleged to be an employee of CITY. All obligations under this provision are to be paid by CONTRACTOR as they are incurred by CITY.

Request for Proposal for Professional Auditing Services

Page 12 ends

322

Page 637 of 1234 ends

Item 10.
b. Without affecting the rights of CITY under any provision of this Agreement or this Section, CONTRACTOR shall not be required to indemnify and hold harmless CITY as set forth above for liability attributable solely to the fault of CITY, provided such fault is determined by agreement between the parties or the findings of a court of competent jurisdiction.

9. Additional Services, Changes and Deletions.

9.01 In the event CONTRACTOR performs additional or different services than those described herein without the prior written approval of the City Manager and/or City Council of CITY, CONTRACTOR shall not be compensated for such services. CONTRACTOR expressly waives any right to be compensated for services and materials not covered by the scope of this Agreement or authorized by the CITY in writing.

10. Termination of A Treement.

10.02 In the event of termination, the payment of monies due CONTRACTOR for undisputed Services performed prior to the effective date of such termination shall be paid within thirty (30) business days after receipt of an invoice as provided in this Agreement Immediately upon termination, CONTRACTOR agrees to promptly provide and deliver to CITY all original documents, reports, studies, plans, specifications and the like which are in the possession or control of CONTRACTOR and pertain to CITY.

11. Status of CONTRACTOR.

11.01 CONTRACTOR shall perform the Services in CONTRACTOR's own way as an independent contractor, and in pursuit of CONTRACTOR's independent calling, and not as an employee of CITY. However, CONTRACTOR shall regularly confer with CITY's City Manager as provided for in this Agreement.

CONTRACTOR is responsible for providing, at its own expense, disability, unemployment, workers' compensation and other insurance, training, permits, and licenses for itself and its Request for Proposal for Professional Auditing Services

Page 13 ends

323

Page 638 of 1234 ends

Item 10.
employees and subcontractors.

12. Ownership of Documents; Audit.

12.01 All draft and final reports, plans, drawings, studies, maps, photographs, specifications, data, notes, manuals, warranties and all other documents of any kind or nature prepared, developed or obtained by CONTRACTOR in connection with the performance of Services performed for the CITY shall become the sole property of CITY, and CONTRACTOR shall promptly deliver all such materials to CITY upon request. At the CITY's sole discretion, CONTRACTOR may be permitted to retain original documents, and furnish reproductions to CITY upon request, at no cost to CITY.

12.02 Subject to applicable federal and state laws, rules and regulations, CITY shall hold all intellectual property rights to any materials developed pursuant to this Agreement.

CONTRACTOR shall not such use data or documents for purposes other than the performance of this Agreement, nor shall CONTRACTOR release, reproduce, distribute, publish, adapt for future use or any other purposes, or otherwise use, any data or other materials first produced in the performance of this Agreement, nor authorize others to do so, without the prior written consent of CITY.

12.03 CONTRACTOR shall retain and maintain, for a period not less than four years following termination of this Agreement, all time records, accounting records and vouchers and all other records with respect to all matters concerning Services performed, compensation paid and expenses reimbursed. At any time during normal business hours and as often as CITY may deem necessary, CONTRACTOR shall make available to CITY's agents for examination all of such records and shall permit CITY's agents to audit, examine and reproduce such records.

13. Miscellaneous Provisions.

13.02 CONTRACTOR shall not assign or otherwise transfer any rights or interest in this Request for Proposal for Professional Auditing Services

Page 14 ends

324

Page 639 of 1234 ends

Item 10.

Agreement without the prior written consent of CITY. Unless specifically stated to the contrary in any written consent to an assignment, no assignment will release or discharge the assignor from any duty or responsibility under this Agreement.

13.03 CONTRACTOR shall timely file FPPC Form 700 Conflict of Interest Statements with CITY if required by California law and/or the CITY's conflict of interest policy.

CONTRACTOR further covenants that in the performance of this Agreement, no person having such interest shall be employed by it as an officer, employee, agent, or subcontractor.

CONTRACTOR shall comply with the requirements of Government Code section 87100 et seq. and section 1090 in the performance of and during the term of this Agreement.

CONTRACTOR shall immediately report any attempt by any CITY officer, employee or agent to solicit (either directly or through an intermediary) improper consideration from CONTRACTOR.

13.09 Severability. If any portion of this Agreement is declared invalid, illegal or otherwise unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the entire balance of this Request for Proposal for Professional Auditing Services

Page 15 ends

325

Page 640 of 1234 ends

Item 10.

Agreement not so affected shall remain in full force and effect.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereby have made and executed this Agreement to be effective as of the day and year first above -written.

CITY: CONTRACTOR:

CITY OF BEAUMONT
By: By:

Rey Santos, Mayor
Print Name:

Title:

Request for Proposal for Professional Auditing Services

Page 16 ends

326

Page 641 of 1234 ends

Item 10.

Attachment II
Scope of Services
The City's goal is to provide the public and its constituents with a financial statement that gives complete, accurate and understandable information about the City's financial condition. The selected independent auditor will be required to perform the following tasks:

1. Annual Financial Report - Audit the Basic Financial Statements of the City to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free from material misstatement. Express an opinion on the fair presentation of the City's governmental activities, business -type activities, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. The Auditor shall also be responsible for performing certain limited procedures involving management's discussion and analysis (MD&A) and the required supplementary information (RSI) required by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board as mandated by generally accepted auditing standards.

2. Single Audit Act Report (if required) — The audit firm will perform a single audit on the expenditures of federal grants in accordance with the provisions of the Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996 and the provisions of U.S. Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-133, Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non -Profit Organizations and render the appropriate audit reports on Internal Control over Finance Reporting based upon the audit of the City's financial statements in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and the appropriate reports on compliance with Requirements Applicable to each Major Program, and internal Control over Compliance. The single audit report prepared and publish by the audit firm will include appropriate schedule of expenditures and material weaknesses and follow up on prior audit findings where required. If the City does not meet the minimum requirements to necessitate a single audit, the fees shall be adjusted accordingly. Additionally, the audit firm will submit the required information to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse.

3. GASB 68 — The firm selected is expected to provide templates and/or journal entries required to comply with Governmental Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 68.

4. Management Letter — The firm will issue a separate "management letter" that includes recommendations for improvement in internal control, accounting procedures and other significant observations that are considered to be non -reportable conditions. The management letter shall be addressed to the City Manager. Prior to its release, City staff shall be given an opportunity to review and comment.

5. Updates — The firm selected is expected to keep the City abreast of new developments affecting municipal finance and reporting, Government Accounting Standards Board pronouncements, procedural changes for grants, etc. The firm is also expected to provide advice to City staff related to the proper accounting treatment for transactions as needed and without additional costs.

Request for Proposal for Professional Auditing Services

Page 17 ends

327

Page 642 of 1234 ends

Item 10.

6. Other — The firm selected will prepare the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) and the statistical sections as well as the Single Audit Report (if needed). The firm will also be asked to prepare the Cities State Controller's Office Financial Transaction Report (FTR). The firm selected may also be asked to examine other reports or perform other services as required. The scope and compensation for any such request would be negotiated between the City and the Auditor.

Auditing Standards to be Followed
To meet the requirements of this Request for Proposal, the audit shall be performed in accordance with:

Generally accepted auditing standards as set forth by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants
The standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States
The provisions of the Federal Single Audit Act
The provisions of the U.S. Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-133, Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non -Profit Organizations Reports to be Issued
Following completion of the audit and preparation of the fiscal year's financial statements and special purpose audits, the Auditor shall issue:

1. Reports on the fair presentation of the financial statements in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America as listed below: a. Basic Financial Statements for the City; b. Single Audit Report

2. A report based on the internal control over financial reporting and on compliance and other matters based on an audit of financial statements performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards.

3. A report on the compliance with requirements that could have a direct and material effect on each major program and internal control over compliance in accordance with OMB Circular A-133 and on the schedule of expenditures of federal awards. Also included would be a schedule of findings and questioned costs associated with federal awards.

4. A Management Letter setting forth recommendations (as applicable) for improvements in the City's internal control, accounting procedures, and any other significant observations.

5. Reports to and communication with those charged with governance, as required by auditing standards.

Request for Proposal for Professional Auditing Services

Page 18 ends

328

Page 643 of 1234 ends

Item 10.

6. Auditors shall be required to make immediate, written notification to the City Council, City Manager, and City Attorney of all irregularities and illegal acts or indications of illegal acts of which they become aware.

7. Any other reports that may become required as a result of a change in accounting standards or new pronouncements that become effective during the term of the engagement.

Other Communications
The Auditor shall make all communications to the City required by the audit standards under which the engagement is performed. Those communications include, but are not limited to:

The Auditor's responsibility under generally accepted auditing standards.

Significant accounting policies.

Management judgment and accounting estimates.

Significant audit adjustments.

Other information in documents containing audited financial statements.

Disagreements with management.

Management consultation with other accountants.

Major issues discussed with management prior to retention.

Difficulties encountered in performing the audit.

Errors, irregularities, and illegal acts.

The Auditor must be available to present the audit plan prior to beginning field work. In addition, the Auditor must be available to present all final reports to City management, Audit and Finance Committe and the City Council as requested at no additional costs.

Working Paper Retention and Access to Working Papers
All work papers and reports must be retained, at the auditor's expense, for a minimum of five years (or the retention timeframe established by the professional standards, whichever is longer) unless the firm is notified in writing by the City of the need to extend the retention period. The work papers are subject to review by Federal and state agencies and other individuals designated by the City. Accordingly, the work papers will be made available upon request.

Request for Proposal for Professional Auditing Services

Page 19 ends

329

Page 644 of 1234 ends

Item 10.

In addition, the firm will respond to the reasonable inquiries of successor auditors and allow successor auditors to review work papers.

Journal Entries
All adjusting journal entries made by the independent auditors must be discussed and explained to the designated Finance Department personnel prior to recording. They should be in a format that shows the lowest level of posting detail needed for data entry in the general ledger system.

Request for Proposal for Professional Auditing Services

Page 20 ends

330

Page 645 of 1234 ends

Item 10.

Attachment III
Cost Summary

NOT TO EXCEED PRICE FOR PROPOSED SERVICES SCHEDULE
In accordance with the Request for Proposal for Audit Services issued by City of Beaumont, the firm referenced below hereby submits the following cost proposal:

Basic Reports to Be Issued
City Audit, including AFR and Related Reports
Total
Additional Audit Reports To Be Requeted At City Option
Single Audit and Related Reports
Annual Report of City Financial Transactions to State Controller Total
Year Ended June 30th
2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
Please include an hourly fee quotation and hours proposed for all positions to be assigned to the audit:

I hereby certify that the undersigned is authorized to represent the firm stated above, and empowered to submit this bid, and if selected, authorized to sign a contract with the City, for the services identified in the Request for Proposals.

Firm Name:

Signature:

Printed Name:

Title:

Date:

Request for Proposal for Professional Auditing Services

Page 21 ends

331
Hours Billing
Rate
1 Estimated Number of
Hours
Estimated Charges
Partners
Mangers
Senior Accountant
Staff Accountant
Clerical/Support Staff
Other
I hereby certify that the undersigned is authorized to represent the firm stated above, and empowered to submit this bid, and if selected, authorized to sign a contract with the City, for the services identified in the Request for Proposals.

Firm Name:

Signature:

Printed Name:

Title:

Date:

Request for Proposal for Professional Auditing Services

Page 21 ends

331

Page 646 of 1234 ends

ROGERS, ANDERSON, MALODY & SCOTT, LLP
CERTIFIED F'UEJL IC: Act. .ir, ,• TL N t SINCE I2 =1i
APRIL 3, 2020

CITY OF BEAUMONT

PROPOSAL FOR PROFESSIONAL AUDITING SERVICES
FOR THE FISCAL YEARS ENDING JUNE 30, 2020, 2021 AND 2022

WITH THE OPTION OF TWO ADDITIONAL FISCAL YEARS)
CONTACT PERSONS:

SCOTT W. MANNO, CPA, CGMA
[email protected]

BRAD WELEBIR, CPA, CGMA, MBA
[email protected]
909.889.0871

PREPARED BY

ROGERS ANDERSON MALODY & SCOTT, LLP
735 E Carnegie Drive, Suite 100
San Bernardino, CA 92408
LICENSE #2596
FEIN 95-2662063
Item 10.
344

Page 647 of 1234 ends

Item 10.

CITY OF BEAUMONT

PROPOSAL FOR PROFESSIONAL AUDITING SERVICES
Table of Contents
Page
Transmittal Letter
Technical Proposal
Personnel 1
Partner and supervisory staff involvement
Staff continuity
Continuing professional education
Assigned personnel
Engagement team resumes
Company background 10
License to practice
Independence
About our firm
Governmental Audit Quality Center
Engagement quality control
Disciplinary action
Equal Opportunity Employer
Peer review 12
External quality control review
Audit approach 13
Services to be provided
Engagement approach
Audit approach and proposed audit segmentation
Level of staff and approximate number of hours assigned to each segment Sample sizes
Audit technology
Analytical procedures
Understanding of internal control over financial reporting Approach in determining applicable laws and regulations Approach in drawing samples for compliance testing
Proposed audit timing
Specific expertise desired 21
References 22
Contract terms 24
Cost summary 25
Attachment A: Government Clients Served
345

Page 648 of 1234 ends

735 E. Carnegie Dr. Suite 100
San Bernardino, CA 92408
909 889 0871 T
909 889 5361 F
ramscpa.net

PARTNERS
Brenda L. Odle, CPA, MST
Terry P. Shea, CPA
Scott W. Manno, CPA, CGMA
Leena Shan bhag, CPA. MST. CGMA
Bradferd A. Welebir. CPA. MBA. CGMA
Jenny W. Liu, CPA, MST
Jay H. Zercher, CPA (Partner Emeritus)
Phillip H. Waller, CPA (Partner Emeritus)
Kirk A. Franks, CPA (Partner Emeritus)

MANAGERS / STAFF
Charles De Simoni, CPA
Gartlenya Duran, CPA
Brianna Schultz. CPA
Jingjie Wu, CPA
Evelyn Morentin-Barcena, CPA
Veronica Hernandez, CPA
Tara R. Thorp, CPA, MSA
Laura Aivizu, CPA
Ye Ying Stella Xia, CPA, MSBA
Louis Fernandez, CPA
Abigail O. Hernandez Conde. CPA, MSA
Zoe Xinlu Zhang, CPA, MSA

MEMBERS
American Institute of
Certified Public Accountants
PCPS The AICPA Alliance
for CPA Firms
Governmental Audit
Quality Censer
Employee Benefit Plan
Audit Quality Center
California Society of
Certified Public Accountants

MEMBER OF
A u
GROUP
A Worldwide Alliance of Independent
Accounting, Lew and Consulting Firms
RA
M S

ROGERS, ANDERSON, MALODY & SCOTT, LLP
CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS. SINCE 1948
April 3, 2020
City of Beaumont
550 E. 6th Street
Beaumont, CA 92223
Dear Evaluation Committee:

I am pleased to respond, on behalf of Rogers, Anderson, Malody & Scott, LLP, RAMS) to your request for a proposal regarding professional auditing services.

As a recognized industry leader and innovator, our goal for the past 72 years has been to provide honest, objective and high quality results to all of our clients, including governmental organizations such as yours. Our success in these efforts is witnessed by both the growth of our firm and the list of long-term clients who trust us.

At RAMS, we are committed to achieving the highest quality audit possible. We understand the complexity of performing governmental audits and that's why we have a dedicated team of auditors that possess the specialized knowledge and experience to help ensure compliance with changes in regulations that may impact your organization. We plan and execute our audits in a way that maximizes audit efficiency and effectiveness and provides you the highest quality services.

We are aware that the City of Beaumont (the City) will be reviewing other proposals during this process, but we believe that RAMS would be an exceptional choice for the audit for the following reasons; which are provided in more detail in our proposal. Our firm:

Utilizes Teammate Analytics, a suite of more than 150 Computer Aided Audit Tools (CAATs). This software empowers our audit teams with the ability to perform powerful, meaningful data analysis which builds upon our other value added services. Teammate Analytics also helps to identify specific transactions or amounts which may be indicative of fraud.

Using our CAAT, performs an intelligent, risk based audit which enables us to focus on key audit areas allowing us to become more efficient resulting in lower audit fees.

Provides auditing services to over 50 governmental agencies and not-for- profit organizations, including over 20 cities, most of which have enterprise activities.

Understands the audit process, as a whole, can be a stressful experience for you and your staff; we understand that you will have other commitments and your regular workloads during the audit. We make every effort to ensure the audit process, from the interim fieldwork to the preparation of any required financial reports, will be as trouble-free as possible for you and your staff. We accomplish this by comprehensively planning the audit and utilizing our staff in the most efficient and effective manner while keeping disruptions and miscommunications to a minimum.

STABILITY ACCURACY. TRUST.

Item 10.
346

Page 649 of 1234 ends

Item 10.

Has an established reputation in the governmental and not-for-profit accounting and auditing community for providing excellent, timely service with high quality reporting to our clients.

Has audit team members that are personable and easy to work with, yet still focused on the audit. Through open and responsive communication with all parties involved in the audit process, we work to have the most efficient audit possible by minimizing operational distractions of your staff, while maximizing quality service and products.

Provides extensive training and continuing education to all of our audit staff through a combined use of in-house instruction and third -party providers. Our audit team members are experienced with and receive regular training in performing Single Audits in accordance with Federal OMB Uniform Guidance.

Is committed to helping you meet all reporting/auditing deadlines, resolving any issues encountered during your audit (e.g. accounting or auditing, new pronouncements, etc.), and providing you with quality audit services.

Has an extensive internal quality control review process to ensure your financial reports meet the highest standards. In addition to the preparation of financial reports by the engagement team and review by the engagement manager, each report is also examined by 2 partners and 1 professional proofreader.

Has assisted many of our clients with the preparation of their Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports, and all of our clients that have submitted their reports for the Government Finance Officers Association GFOA) or California Society of Municipal Finance Officers (CSMFO) awards have received the awards.

Our participation as a GFOA reviewer also indirectly benefits our clients in the quality review process.

Is a full service firm, with specialists in auditing, reviews and compilations, tax planning and preparation, as well as business consulting. The diverse experience and accessibility of the professionals in these areas help us to provide a comprehensive approach to a wide variety of needs.

Believes that our fee estimate and arrangement provides a fair and reasonable cost, commensurate with the experience of the audit team members, to perform the requested audit services.

We are a local Inland Empire firm. All of our employees live, work and shop in the region, allowing our local cities to benefit from our sales and property taxes.

Rogers, Anderson, Malody & Scott, LLP is properly licensed to practice in California, including all of the assigned professional staff to the engagement. Mr. Welebir, Partner and Mr. Manno, Partner are authorized to represent the firm, are empowered to submit the bid and authorized to sign a contract with the City. We understand the work to be done as listed in the section of this proposal titled Services to be provided. In addition, we will be committed to meeting any agreed upon time frames. This proposal is valid for ninety (90) days.

We can be reached at: 735 E. Carnegie Drive, Suite 100, San Bernardino, CA 92408, (909) 889-0871, [email protected] or .;manno ramscpa.net.

Thank you for the opportunity to present our proposal to the City. We will be committed to exceeding your expectations of an auditor and believe this proposal provides you with information about our firm, the service team members and our customized audit approach. We look forward to having a long and mutually beneficial relationship with the City. Please contact us if you have any questions regarding this proposal.

AICPA
GAQC Member
Respectfully yours,

ROGERS, ANDERSON, MALODY& SCOTT, LLP
rgeop—w4-
Scott W. Manno, CPA, CGMA
Partner
347

Page 650 of 1234 ends

CITY OF BEAUMONT

PROPOSAL FOR PROFESSIONAL AUDITING SERVICES
Item 10.

Personnel
The quality of service you receive is dependent on the capabilities of the individuals assigned to the engagement, and the manner in which those personnel resources are organized to efficiently focus their abilities on providing you with the requested audit services. These professionals are highly trained and knowledgeable and have a thorough understanding of the environment in which governmental and not-for- profit entities operate. This experience is a critical component in providing the City with an effective and efficient audit.

Our engagement team will provide significant experience coupled with an extensive, practical understanding of governmental and not-for-profit accounting and auditing along with a broad business perspective. Each member will have access to a wide range of technical resources and knowledge bases which will enable them to provide the City with practical observations and effective solutions.

Quality Control Reviewer
Brad A. Welebir, CPA,

CGMA, MBA
AICPA
GAQC Member
City of Beaumont
City Council
Manager
Charles De Simoni, CPA,
CGMA
Senior
eronica Hernandez, CPA
1-
Concurring Partner
Terry Shea, CPA
R A
M S
348

Page 651 of 1234 ends

CITY OF BEAUMONT

PROPOSAL FOR PROFESSIONAL AUDITING SERVICES
Item 10.

Personnel (continued)
Partner and supervisory staff involvement
All partners and supervisory staff are working professionals and are actively and continually involved in all aspects of their engagements. We believe that partner and supervisory staff involvement in all areas of the audit is a key aspect of the overall audit process. This involvement includes being on-site for interim and year- end fieldwork, thus facilitating a proper, efficient and effective audit, with minimal disruption of your staff. In addition, the time spent on-site by the partners and supervisory staff ensures they gain an understanding of the entire City's accounting processes and procedures. This understanding will enable them to evaluate and develop opportunities for efficiency as well as offer practical and functional advice for improving your accounting processes and procedures.

All professionals on this engagement have worked on audits similar in nature to the City's, therefore, the City will not have to train our engagement team.

Staff continuity
Continuity of audit staff is a principal concern with our firm. In order to retain our staff, we offer extremely competitive wages, opportunities for advancement, generous medical packages, a retirement plan, bonus opportunities, as well as educational benefits. Even with the benefits we provide, we realize we may lose staff at any given time. Knowing this, we plan to provide staff continuity from year to year, which is in the best interest of the City and our firm. Continuity ensures an orderly, efficient, and less disruptive audit experience.

Since we cannot guarantee staff will remain with us, principal supervisory and management staff, including engagement partners, managers, other supervisory staff, and specialists, may be changed if those personnel leave the firm or are promoted. However, the City reserves the right to accept or reject replacements.

We believe that due to the significant involvement of the partners on all of our engagements, any staff transition would have a minimal effect on the audit efficiency and effectiveness of subsequent years.

Continuing professional education
Our team of auditor specialists stays current in this highly technical practice area by adhering to, and typically exceeding, the continuing professional education requirements of Government Auditing Standards as well as the State Board of Accountancy guidelines. All professionals at our firm participate in continuing professional education (CPE) programs, which are sponsored by various organizations including the Government Finance Officers Association, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, the California State Society of Certified Public Accountants, the California Society of Municipal Finance Officers and the Association of Government Accountants. Participation in these programs helps us to ensure that our clients are serviced with the best trained and most proficient government and not-for-profit auditors and accountants available. In addition, we periodically provide in-house training taught by our partners and senior level staff using published resources. All staff are required to attend fraud and ethics training. It is our goal to provide our professional staff continuing education which exceeds the minimum standard of 80 hours over two years.

In accordance with our firm's Quality Control document and Government Auditing Standards (GAS), all staff members who work on audits subject to GAS are required to complete CPE in accordance with GAS standards which require 24 hours directly related to governmental accounting and auditing.

In addition to the required CPE, we also use the following to increase our technical knowledge: view the Governmental Audit Quality Center Annual Webcast Update and other relevant seminars and review monthly publications from the AICPA, the GFOA, and various other resources. We also attend conferences and seminars sponsored by the GFOA, California Society of Municipal Finance Officers and the California Special District Association.

AICPA
GAQC Member 2-
R
349

Page 652 of 1234 ends

CITY OF BEAUMONT

PROPOSAL FOR PROFESSIONAL AUDITING SERVICES
Item 10.
111 d
Personnel (continued)
Assigned personnel
It is our goal to provide you with capable, competent, and personable individuals who offer an extensive background, not only in governmental and not-for-profit accounting and auditing, but also in general business practices. We offer practical solutions, as well as provide technical support. This enables you to stay at the forefront of governmental and not-for-profit accounting and provides you with the support you need in dealing with the complex issues confronting entities such as yours.

In addition, our engagement team has the managerial and supervisory experience to provide the City with a comprehensive audit of the highest quality, while still focusing on personal service. The resumes of the key engagement personnel assigned to the audit are presented near the end of this proposal. The following individuals will be assigned to the engagement for the entire contract period:

Scott W. Manno, CPA, CGMA - Partner, Engagement Partner Scott is a municipal audit partner with the firm and will be the engagement partner. He is licensed to practice as a certified public accountant in the State of California. He has been in public accounting for 25 years specializing in serving local governments such as yours. As the engagement partner, he will be responsible for overall engagement quality, as well as ensuring that the engagement is performed in the most effective and efficient manner. Scott will directly oversee all engagement staff while assisting in planning and performing the engagement as well as reviewing all work -papers prepared during the engagement, in addition to all required reports. Scott is a working partner and will be actively and continually involved in all aspects of the engagement.

Terry Shea, CPA - Partner, Concurring Partner
Terry is also a municipal audit partner with the firm. He is licensed to practice as a certified public accountant in the State of California. Terry has over 39 years of public accounting experience and has provided accounting, auditing, and consulting services for municipalities, special districts, water agencies, and various not-for-profit organizations. As the concurring partner, Terry will work directly with Scott in planning and performing the engagement. In addition, he will provide technical consultation for the engagement team.

Brad A. Welebir, CPA, CGMA, MBA - Partner, Quality Control Reviewer Brad will be the Quality Control Reviewer. He is licensed to practice as a certified public accountant in the State of California. He has over 16 years of practical, governmental accounting and auditing experience.

Brad will be responsible for the final quality control review of all released reports.

Charles De Simoni, CPA, CGMA - Engagement Manager
Charles is an audit manager with the firm. He is licensed to practice as a certified public accountant in the State of California. Charles has over 10 years of public accounting experience and has provided accounting, auditing, and consulting services for municipalities, special districts, water agencies, and various not-for-profit organizations. He will work directly with Scott and Terry while supervising the engagement team during all phases of the engagement. In addition, he will oversee the preparation of any required reports.

AICPA
GAQC Member 3-
CIO
ale
350

Page 653 of 1234 ends

CITY OF BEAUMONT

PROPOSAL FOR PROFESSIONAL AUDITING SERVICES
Item 10.

Personnel (continued)
Veronica Hernandez, CPA - Audit Senior
Veronica is an Audit Senior with the firm. She is licensed to practice as a certified public accountant in the State of California. She has over 4 years' experience in providing accounting and auditing services for municipalities, special districts and various not-for-profit organizations. As an audit senior, Veronica will work closely with the engagement partner and manager and be responsible for planning the audit, supervising the staff assigned to the engagement, and performing reviews of all work -papers prepared for the engagement. In addition, she will also be responsible for the preparation of any required reports.

Senior and staff level accountants
All staff employed by us and working on governmental audits are qualified to perform governmental audits.

Each staff member is encouraged to take on increased responsibility for engagements previously worked on. This enables our staff to grow on each engagement and allows them to continue to gain the skills and knowledge required to perform the audits.

In summary, we want to emphasize the credentials of the above professionals who will be directly responsible for the quality of service that you will receive. Additionally, our audit team has another attribute that is very important, even though it is intangible -- the professionals assigned to the audits have previously worked together as a multi -disciplined team, thus ensuring a smooth, efficient and effective audit. We are committed to allocating the necessary resources to ensure that we provide continuity of personnel throughout the term of our relationship with the City.

Full engagement team resumes are provided as follows.

6. AICPA
GAQC Member 4-
122
351

Page 654 of 1234 ends

Item 10.
1CITYOFBEAUMONT

PROPOSAL FOR PROFESSIONAL AUDITING SERVICES
Personnel (continued)
Engagement team resumes
Scott W. Manno, CPA, CGMA
Engagement Partner
Professional experience
Mr. Manno began his career with Thomas, Bigbie and Smith in 1995 after serving in the United States Army. He spent six years with the firm primarily working on audits of municipalities, special districts and redevelopment agencies as well as various not-for-profit organizations. He joined Rogers, Anderson, Melody & Scott, LLP in July 2001. Currently, Mr. Manno serves as a technical reviewer for the GFOA CAFR Award program. Since 2010, Mr. Manno has been serving as a technical volunteer on the California Special Districts Association Audit Committee and is also on the Association's fiscal committee providing accounting and fiscal program guidance. Also, Mr. Manno has done presentations on fraud.

In addition, he is part of the California State Society of Certified Public Accountants Governmental Accounting and Auditing Committee which meets periodically to discuss current events, pronouncements, etc., including the implementation of GASBS 68/75.

Education/licenses
Bachelor of Science degree from California State University, San Bernardino Certified Public Accountant - State of California
Chartered Global Management Accountant - American Institute of Certified Public Accountants Related professional experience
Partial listing of relevant governmental agencies served (*includes enterprise fund accounting):

City of EI Cajon*
City of Sierra Madre*
City of Claremont
City of San Jacinto*
Town of Yucca Valley
City of Fillmore*
City of Perris*
City of Menifee
City of La Mesa*
City of Chino*
City of Exeter*
City of Aliso Viejo
City of La Verna
City of 29 Palms
City of Woodlake*
City of Poway*
Mr. Manno has completed over 200 hours of continuing professional education courses over the past three years of which the following select courses are relevant to this engagement:

Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Fraud Related Internal Controls American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, Governmental Accounting and Auditing Update Checkpoint Learning, GASB Pension Standards Overview
Professional affiliations
Mr. Manno is a member of the following organizations:

American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) California Society of Certified Public Accountants (CaICPA) Association of Government Accountants (AGA)
Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (ACFE)
Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA)
California Special Districts Association (CSDA)
California Society of Municipal Finance Officers (CSMFO) LI* AICPA
GAQC Member 5-
R A
M S
352

Page 655 of 1234 ends

CITY OF BEAUMONT

PROPOSAL FOR PROFESSIONAL AUDITING SERVICES
Item 10.

Personnel (continued)
Terry P. Shea, CPA
Concurring Partner
Related professional experience
Professional experience
Mr. Shea began his career with Thomas, Byrne and Smith in 1981. He spent five years with the firm primarily working on audits of municipalities, special districts, redevelopment and other governmental agencies. He joined Rogers, Anderson, Malody & Scott, LLP in 1987 where he has completed governmental audits including municipalities and provided financial consulting services for various cities.

Education/licenses
Bachelor of Arts degree from California State University, Fullerton Certified Public Accountant - State of California
Partial listing of relevant governmental agencies served (*includes enterprise fund accounting):

City of La Mesa*
City of Grand Terrace*
City of Twentynine Palms
City of Corona*
City of Norco*
City of Indio*
City of Fontana*
City of Loma Linda*
City of San Jacinto*
City of Palm Desert*
City of Coachella
City of Goleta
City of Mission Viejo*
City of Riverside*
City of El Cajon*
City of Indian Wells
City of Fillmore
City of Redondo Beach*
City of Poway
City of San Marcos
Mr. Shea served as the Interim Finance Director for the City of Perris from July 1998 to October 2001. He currently serves as the Contract Finance Director for one Riverside County city and one Los Angeles County city.

Continuing professional education
Mr. Shea has completed over 120 hours of continuing professional education courses in the past three years, of which, the following select courses are relevant to this engagement:

American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, Foundations in Governmental Accounting American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, Governmental and Not -for -Profit Conference California Society of CPAs Education Foundation, Governmental Auditing Skills Thomson Reuters, Audits of State and Local Governments
Professional affiliations
Mr. Shea is a member of the following professional organizations:

American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) California Society of Certified Public Accountants (CaICPA) Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA)
California Society of Municipal Finance Officers (CSMFO) AICPA
GAQC Member 6- 111
353

Page 656 of 1234 ends

CITY OF BEAUMONT

PROPOSAL FOR PROFESSIONAL AUDITING SERVICES
Item 10.

Personnel (continued)
Brad A. Welebir, CPA, CGMA, MBA
Quality Control Partner
Professional experience
Related professional experience
Mr. Welebir joined Rogers, Anderson, Malody & Scott, LLP in January 2004.

He works primarily on audits of governmental agencies, small to mid-sized businesses, and not-for-profit organizations. Mr. Welebir serves as a technical reviewer for the GFOA CAFR Award program.

Education/licenses
Masters of Business Administration - Accounting Emphasis from California State University, Fullerton
Bachelor of Arts in Business Administration from La Sierra University Certified Public Accountant - State of California
Chartered Global Management Accountant - American Institute of Certified Public Accountants
Partial listing of relevant governmental agencies served (*includes enterprise fund accounting):

San Bernardino International Airport Authority*
City of Twentynine Palms
City of Loma Linda*
City of San Bernardino*
City of Sierra Madre*
City of San Jacinto*
City of Moorpark*
City of Fillmore*
Continuing professional education
Inland Valley Development Agency*
City of San Juan Capistrano
City of La Verne
City of Mission Viejo*
City of Rosemead
City of Redondo Beach*
City of Claremont
City of San Marcos
Mr. Welebir has completed over 120 hours of continuing professional education courses in the past three years of which the following select courses are relevant to this engagement:

California Society of CPAs Education Foundation, Governmental Accounting and Auditing Update American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, OMB A-133 Single Audit Update California Society of Municipal Finance Officers, Annual Conference Sessions Government Finance Officers Association, GAAP Update
Thomson Reuters, Yellow Book Update
Professional affiliations
Mr. Welebir is a member of the following professional organizations:

Page 657 of 1234 ends

CITY OF BEAUMONT

PROPOSAL FOR PROFESSIONAL AUDITING SERVICES
Item 10.

Personnel (continued)
Charles De Simoni, CPA, CGMA
Audit Manager
Related professional experience
Professional experience
Mr. De Simoni joined Rogers, Anderson, Malody & Scott, LLP in January 2009.

He works primarily on audits of governmental agencies, small to mid-sized businesses, and nonprofit organizations. Prior to joining our firm, he worked at Jasper Engines, where he was assistant branch operations manager Education/licenses
Bachelor of Science in Business Administration from CSUSB Certified Public Accountant — State of California
Chartered Global Management Accountant — American Institute of Certified Public Accountants
Partial listing of relevant governmental agencies served (*includes enterprise fund accounting):

City of Fillmore*
Town of Yucca Valley
City of Rosemead
City of Moorpark*
City of San Bernardino*
City of Redondo Beach*
City of West Covina*
Continuing professional education
City of Twentynine Palms
City of Hawthorne*
Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District
City of Menifee
City of Loma Linda*
City of La Verne
City of Aliso Viejo
Mr. De Simoni has completed over 120 hours of continuing professional education courses in the past three years of which the following select courses are relevant to this engagement:

California Society of Municipal Finance Officers, GASB Update California Society of Municipal Finance Officers, GASB 75 Case Study California Society of Municipal Finance Officers, OPEB
California Society of Municipal Finance Officers, GASB 87: Lease Accounting Wolters Kluwer CCH CPE Link, Governmental Accounting and Auditing Update Wolters Kluwer CCH CPE Link, Government Auditing: Current Developments Wolters Kluwer CCH CPE Link, Sub -recipient Monitoring Under Uniform Guidance Professional affiliations
Mr. De Simoni is a member of the following professional organizations:

Page 658 of 1234 ends

CITY OF BEAUMONT

PROPOSAL FOR PROFESSIONAL AUDITING SERVICES
Personnel (continued)
Veronica Hernandez, CPA
Audit Senior
Related professional experience
Professional Experience
Item 10.

Ms. Hernandez is an Audit Senior with the firm. She has over 4 years' experience in providing accounting and auditing services for municipalities, special districts and various nonprofit organizations. As an audit senior, she will work closely with the engagement partner and manager and be responsible for planning the audit, supervising the staff assigned to the engagement, and performing reviews of all workpapers prepared for the engagement. In addition, she will also be responsible for the preparation of any required reports.

Education
Bachelor of Science degree from California State University, San Bernardino Certified Public Accountant — State of California
Partial listing of relevant governmental agencies served (*includes enterprise fund accounting):

City of Loma Linda*
City of Aliso Viejo
City of Hawthorne
City of West Covina
City of Moorpark*
City of San Jacinto
Continuing Professional Education
City of La Verne*
City of Claremont
City of El Cajon
City of Poway*
City of San Marcos
Town of Yucca Valley
Ms. Hernandez has completed over 100 hours of continuing professional education courses over the past two years of which the following select courses are relevant to this engagement:

California Society of Municipal Finance Officers, Lease Accounting California Society of Municipal Finance Officers, Fiduciary Activities California Society of Municipal Finance Officers, Blue Book has been updated California Society of Municipal Finance Officers, Lease Accounting of tomorrow California Society of Municipal Finance Officers, GASB Update American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, Governmental Accounting and Auditing Update Professional affiliations
Ms. Hernandez is a member of the following professional organizations:

American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) California Society of Certified Public Accountants (CaICPA) California Society of Municipal Finance Officers (CSMFO) AICPA
GAQC Member 9-
356

Page 659 of 1234 ends

CITY OF BEAUMONT

PROPOSAL FOR PROFESSIONAL AUDITING SERVICES
Item 10.

Company background
Name:

Street Address:

City, State, Zip Code:

Corporate structure:

State/County of incorporation:

Website:

License #:

Contact information:

License to practice
Rogers, Anderson, Malody & Scott, LLP
735 E. Carnegie Drive, Suite 100
San Bernardino, CA 92408
Limited liability partnership
California/San Bernardino
www.ramscpa.net
2596
Scott W. Manno, CPA, CGMA
909.889.0871
[email protected]
Rogers, Anderson, Malody & Scott, LLP is licensed to practice in the State of California. The key professional staff, which includes the partners, managers, and supervisors, are all certified public accountants licensed to practice in the State of California and are in compliance with all applicable Board of Accountancy standards.

Independence
Rogers, Anderson, Malody & Scott, LLP is independent of the City and any component units, as defined by general standard number two of the generally accepted auditing standards, and by the second general standard for government auditing in the U.S. Government Accountability Office's Government Auditing Standards.

About our firm
and auditing practice
Our firm was founded in 1948 and is located at 735 E. Carnegie Drive, Suite 100, San Bernardino, California and provides the full range of services expected of a full service accounting firm.

We are one of the oldest, most trusted and respected CPA firms in Southern California, with over 72 years of public practice experience, specializing in governmental agency and not-for-profit organization auditing, accounting and
management advisory services. Over nineteen thousand hours peryearare devoted to this area of our practice, which includes cities, redevelopment successor agencies, water districts, other special districts, not-for-profit corporations and joint power authorities. We do not use our government accounting as "fill work" for the firm, it is one of our primary focuses.

We understand your desire engage auditors that have a thorough understanding of the ever changing complex accounting and compliance issues confronting governments today. Our firm has an extensive history of governmental accounting and auditing. During that time we have gained valuable experience, acquired an in- depth knowledge of, and obtained the technical expertise needed to perform high quality governmental audits.

This expertise has enabled us to provide exceptional, high quality service and to provide solutions at fees we feel represent our value to our clients. In addition, we use our participation in various industry associations to continuously update our knowledge with respect to issues relating to governmental accounting, auditing and operations. Any insight we gain is immediately passed on to our clients if we feel they will benefit from it. a. AICPA
GAQC Member 10-
RIA
MIS
357

Page 660 of 1234 ends

CITY OF BEAUMONT

PROPOSAL FOR PROFESSIONAL AUDITING SERVICES
tsar .:•*•2=15WPEEKNErimmenunt
Item 10.

Company background (continued)
Our firm has a total staff of thirty-two people, which includes sixteen certified public accountants. The staff consists of six partners, three managers, seven supervisors/senior accountants, eleven staff accountants and five support staff. The audit staff consists of twenty members who devote over 80% of their time to municipal engagements. The engagement team assigned to the City's engagement will consist of the following full-time staff: one audit partner, one audit manager, one audit supervisor/senior and two to three staff auditors. All personnel are located in our San Bernardino office.

Governmental Audit Quality Center
As a member of the American Institute of CPAs Governmental Audit Quality Center (Center), we are committed to adhering to the highest quality standards by voluntarily agreeing to the Center membership requirements, which include designating a partner responsible for the quality of our governmental and not-for- profit audit practice, establishing quality control programs, performing annual internal inspection procedures, and making our peer review report findings publicly available. At RAMS, our goal is to continue to enhance our quality initiatives within our governmental and not-for-profit audit practice to deliver the highest quality audit services possible.

In addition, the Governmental Audit Quality Center provides access to comprehensive resources that will assist us in further enhancing the quality of your audit. The Center membership provides us with timely information on a variety of technical, legislative and regulatory subjects that we can in turn apply to your audit to help ensure compliance with the appropriate standards and changes in regulations which we pass on to our clients.

Engagement quality control
We have an extensive internal quality control review process to ensure your audit meets the highest standards. In addition to the preparation of financial reports by a senior member of the engagement team, each report is reviewed by the engagement manager/supervisor and then is examined by the engagement partner. Subsequently, a technical review is then performed by the Quality Control partner along with being proofread by a professional staff. In addition, all audit workpapers are reviewed by the in -charge auditor and the partner in -charge of the engagement.

Disciplinary action
The firm has never had any disciplinary action taken or pending against it with state regulatory bodies or professional organizations, nor has it ever had any pending or settled litigation, civil or criminal investigations.

Our firm does not have a record of substandard work.

In addition to the external quality control review, our firm performs in-house peer reviews over our audit and attest engagements annually.

Equal Opportunity Employer
Our firm is an equal opportunity employer and is committed to providing employment opportunities to all qualified persons regardless of race, color, sex, religion, national origin or handicap. Our staff represents a wide range of cultures and ethnic backgrounds. We provide opportunities for advancement for all staff based on ability, skill and desire to advance.

AICPA
GAQC Member 11-
Q
358

Page 661 of 1234 ends

CITY OF BEAUMONT

PROPOSAL FOR PROFESSIONAL AUDITING SERVICES
Item 10.
1 I.

1. y
Peer review
External quality control review
As a member of the AICPA Private Companies Practice Section, our firm has participated in the "Peer Review" program since 1993 and has been examined every three years since that date by an outside, independent firm of certified public accountants. Participation in this program ensures that our engagements, firm policies, and audit procedures meet the standards of the AICPA, the Yellow Book and the California State Board of Accountancy. Throughout our participation in this program, the firm has received pass ratings from the peer reviewers. The latest review below included reviews of specific governmental entities.

During the latest review, an
independent firm reviewed our
policies and procedures and then
inspected a representative
sample of engagement
workpapers and reports, including
governmental entities and
engagements subject to the
Uniform Guidance. For the year
ended November 30, 2017, our
firm received a rating of pass
which indicates our auditing
practice is suitably designed and
complied with to provide
reasonable assurance of
performing and reporting in
conformity with applicable
standards. The results provide
confirmation that the custom audit
approach and procedures we use
are technically sound and in
compliance with applicable
standards.

The firm is not aware of any
federal or state desk reviews or
field reviews of its audits during
the last three years.

4..

GAQC Member
3rant Bennett Associates
raareaswMat. aaworunwa
Report on the fimfs System of Quality Control
May 15, 2012
To the Partum; of Rogers, Amderxy Mrody & Scat LLP and the Peer Revlon Committee of the Caadorma Soddy of CPAs:
we have renewed the sysiem of quality torero for U+e accounting and aua&ng praedce of Pagers„ AMerson- Mclody & Scott, LLP (the fine; in effect far the year ended November 30, 2017. Our pee, renew was conducted in accordance with the Standard: fa Pnianrr 9 and Reporting on Pee' Renews a 01bdwd by the Peer Review Board of the Amason 1015 ,tie of Certified Prone Acmaitant (Standard).

A summary of the nature, objectives, scope, Yntaborc dt, and the procedures perfaTM in a Sy01em Penny as described Mew Standar* may be tared at nweumpe orgrprstnrwy. The sanmoy also includes an ehprenadon M how etgagenheres identified ad Pat pertamed or reported in conformity wi5, appicable profereacnal =naand:, dam, are evaluated by a pee, reetewrer to determine a per review rating_. firm's Responsiblhty
Tx Item Is remon:Mte for de-.pnu s a system a vanish, conn and complyng with it to provide the tarn 04th reronable assurance of deforming and reporting M conformity vitt, appticab'e prole«tonal standard: in aE rnatend respect. The time is ate wormer* to evaluating actions to Promptly rernedate engagerneea deemed a1 not performed or reported in cereal -0V wee professional 0, ndard1 when appiepi a(e, and fee remediating Weathezes mit ;y-.tnn a' quality carve: if any.

Peer Reviewer's Responsibility
Our respona0l ty is to erprm mn opinna1 en the dray, of the sy leo d quality carbo; and ire firths compiancetherreith based on our review.

Required Selections and Considerations
Ergapenene selected for nine* included engagement fxrfamed urdtr Govemmmt A+ddinp standard, encludrng a compliance rude ander the 5.'.'c Audi Act and en audit or an employee benefit plan As a part of our peer renew, we tavdered review: r, regulatory entities m con imoacated iv; the fem. app3oabie, in determmi g the mhne and extent of our procedure-..

Opinion
In our malice; the sy0mr or qualm„• torrid fa the accotnerg and auditing practice of Roger Anderon Melody & Scott UP in erica Pot die year ended november 30. 2017, ha: been astable designed and combed with to provide the firm with temonaCae )•.)ranee of performing acrd reporting in contorn0; -w'itwith applicable p0ksaonal Abideds n air mater M fespeeb. Timm can moths is rating of pa-, pots wen dl,rrientyti d 5140.

Rager4 Anderon, Naiad/ A Scott ILP rias received a pee- review rating of pmt.

XIA...1G r.ai A..r.400.

GRANT BE!#LETT ASSOCIATES
A PRO5E551014A4. CORPCRAT1O44
Certified PubSc Accountant
B 1375 Eopoaioon Boulevard, State 230
9aeramenlo. CA 95111'5
4167922-5509 FAX 44e'641-5Joci
12- Gab
P.O. Box 223096
PrinceMe. HI 46722
p35. 769. 7323
359

Page 662 of 1234 ends

CITY OF BEAUMONT

PROPOSAL FOR PROFESSIONAL AUDITING SERVICES
111112fiu ... ....ti r_
item 10.

Audit approach
Services to be provided
The City desires the auditor to express an opinion on the fair presentation of the financial statements for the following: the City of Beaumont in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

In addition, we shall:

Preparation of the financial statements.

Apply certain limited procedures related to Management's Discussion and Analysis and Required Supplementary Information and provide an "in -relation -to" report on the combining and individual fund financial statements and supporting schedules, if applicable.

Provide opinions as to the compliance with the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (OMB Uniform Guidance). RAMS is to provide an "in - relation -to" report on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards based on the auditing procedures applied during the audit of the financial statements.

Determine compliance with bond covenants.

GASB 68 assistance.

Prepare the Annual Transaction Report to the State Controllers Office.

Test compliance with Article XIIIB pertaining to the City's appropriation limit, and prepare an Agreed - Upon Procedures report to the City Council regarding compliance.

Provide updates on recent GASB pronouncements as needed.

Our audit(s) will be in accordance with:

Generally Accepted Auditing Standards as promulgated by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, including requirements found in the new AICPA audit guide "Audits of State and Local Governments".

Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller of the United States of America.

Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards OMB Uniform Guidance).

Any other applicable standards for conducting the examinations of items outlined in the Scope of Work to be performed and/or reports to be issued.

Reports to be issued:

A report on the fair presentation of the financial statements in conformity with GAAP.

A report on internal control over financial reporting and on compliance and other matters based on an audit of financial statements performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards.

A report in compliance with requirements applicable to each major federal program and internal control over compliance in accordance with the Uniform Guidance.

Prepare Management Letter that includes significant and less significant (i.e. reportable and non - reportable) recommendations for improvements to internal control.

We will issue reports to those charged with governance (SAS 114 letters) as required by auditing standards.

RAMS will also perform the following:

We shall communicate to management any reportable conditions found during the audit, including significant deficiencies and material weaknesses, nonreportable conditions will be reported in a separate letter to management.

Make an immediate, written notification of all irregularities and illegal acts or indication of illegal acts of which we become aware to the following: City Manager and the Director of Finance.

AICPA
GAQC Member 13- 1213
360 •

Page 663 of 1234 ends

CITY OF BEAUMONT

PROPOSAL FOR PROFESSIONAL AUDITING SERVICES
Item 10.

Audit approach (continued)
Engagement approach
Our engagement approach for your audit will be developed using established goals which will enable measurement of the audit process by the engagement partner and lead auditor. Our approach involves frequent communication between the partner and the engagement team to ensure that all audit objectives are achieved in accordance with our goals and that any issues which may arise are communicated and dealt with on a timely basis. Our overall knowledge and expertise in governmental accounting and auditing has allowed us to identify key audit and accounting risks in the government environment. More importantly, the approach provides for a complete reassessment of the management and control environment in each year's audit and thus is capable of responding to changes and will ensure that deadlines are met in issuing the annual financial statements.

Our engagement approach has been developed and refined over many years. The backbone of our approach revolves around the following six constants:

Knowledge and experience. We have been auditing governmental entities like the City, both large and small, for over 72 years. This experience has allowed us to gain in-depth knowledge of the governmental environment which in turn allows us to perform a more efficient and effective audit and enables us to perform detailed risk assessment procedures. These risk assessment procedures allow us to identify significant audit risk areas within the City.

Oversight. Professional judgment is not developed overnight. Our partners, managers and supervisors have been deeply involved in governmental audits on a continuous basis for most of their professional careers. By having direct partner and manager oversight, we are able to design audit strategies that result in effective and efficient audits.

Timeliness. Deadlines are not just "dates" to us, they are professional commitments. All required deadlines will be met.

Open communication. Open lines of communication with all parties (the engagement team members and City Management and staff) throughout the audit process helps to eliminate "surprises." Proper planning and proper use of experienced engagement personnel tend to provide for an effective and efficient audit process. Consequently, inefficiencies, disruptions, and lack of understanding are kept to a minimum.

Availability. All engagement team members are available throughout the year for any questions or additional consultation. City staff will have direct access to the partner, manager and other supervisory staff at all times during the engagement, as well as subsequent to.

Cost effectiveness. Our customized audit approach and procedures and our experienced auditors help to reduce your overall audit costs while still providing and effective audit and high quality reports.

Intelligent design: As discussed later in our proposal, all of our audits are designed to be intelligent using our powerful audit software tools (Engagement and Teammate Analytics). This allows us to analyze large amounts of data in seconds increasing both efficiency and effectiveness on all engagements.

AICPA
GAQC Member 14- is
361

Page 664 of 1234 ends

CITY OF BEAUMONT

PROPOSAL FOR PROFESSIONAL AUDITING SERVICES
IA* riugqirimMIllviii'Z71G' -
Item 10.

Audit approach (continued)
As indicated in the next section of the proposal, the overall objective of the engagement with the City is to conduct an audit of the financial statements in accordance with required auditing standards and the expression of an opinion on those financial statements. Beyond that initial objective, we believe that our engagement approach provides certain other value added characteristics, at no additional cost, that will benefit the City over the long- term:

All of our audits are designed to be performed in an efficient and effective way to minimize disruption to the office operations.

We offer practical observations and recommendations relating to internal control issues, implementation of accounting standards and the policies and procedures regarding both.

We identify opportunities for operating efficiencies which can be used to decrease operating costs of the City.

Audit approach and proposed audit segmentation
The following is a summary of the audit team's audit approach for the City's engagement. The audit will be divided into the following segments:

Segment 1 - Interim testing - planning, pre -audit administration and internal control testing During this phase of the audit, our principal objectives will be to gather information about the City and its environment, including its internal control over financial reporting.

In order to achieve the desired objectives of this phase of the audit, we will:

Meet with the City's staff in order to determine convenient dates in which we can begin our audit, and to discuss the assistance to be provided by the City's staff.

Hold brainstorming sessions with engagement team members to discuss the susceptibility of the City's financial statements to material misstatement and fraud.

Review and evaluate the City's accounting and reporting processes by reviewing the prior year's audit workpapers, any City -prepared documents such as budgets, in-house financial reports, policies and procedures manuals, minutes of council meetings, etc., and by using various analytical procedures.

Analytical procedures will enhance our understanding of the City and will help us identify areas that may need further assessment and additional testing.

Review and retain copies of any pertinent local, state and federal statutes, regulations, or charters that apply to the City.

Evaluate the design of controls that are relevant to the audit by obtaining a thorough understanding of the City's internal controls over financial reporting and compliance by documenting key internal control components, utilizing questionnaires, walkthroughs, inquiring of the City's personnel, and observing and reviewing key supporting documentation (a more thorough explanation of this process is discussed later in the technical proposal).

Test controls, if control risk is assessed below the maximum, by selecting a sample of transactions within the audit area being tested and reviewing supporting documentation, and evaluating the completeness of the documentation tested, as well as the adequacy of support and approvals as they appear on the support.

Document and review with management, any findings noted during the testing of internal controls and provide a preliminary management letter that will include our recommendations for improving any weaknesses in operations. The letter will also include suggestions for improving the efficiency of the City's operations.

AICPA
GAQC Member 15-
CIO
362

Page 665 of 1234 ends

CITY OF BEAUMONT

PROPOSAL FOR PROFESSIONAL AUDITING SERVICES
Item 10.

Audit approach (continued)
In addition, we will perform the following procedures related to IT General Controls that "touch" financial data:

Security access (including physical) controls: evaluate the general system security settings and password parameters; evaluate the process for adding, deleting and changing security access; and evaluate the access capabilities of various types of users; evaluate access controls to networks and financial applications; evaluate access controls related to data files; and evaluate physical access to networks, servers, etc.

Computer operations: Evaluate backup and recovery processes; and review processes of identifying and handling operational problems.

System development and system changes: Evaluate processes related to system development and system changes (if applicable).

Application testing: We will determine if the testing of application controls is deemed necessary based on our professional judgment in the planning stages of the engagement. If deemed appropriate, application control testing might consist of the following:
o Interview key personnel, inquire of testing processes (quality assurance and end user testing) for application changes, review the chain of relevant documents (end user acceptance report); o Observe attempts to input incorrect data, determine who can override controls; o If table driven, determine who can change edits and tolerance levels; o Conduct tests based on user access rights;
o Test access privileges for each sensitive function or transaction:
o Review access rights that set and amend configurable approval and authorization limits; o Observe transmission reports and error reports;
o Observe validity and completeness parameters and settings; o Review access to set and amend configurable parameters on file transfers; and o Review process for validation and test operation.

This phase of the engagement for the audit will be performed by the audit senior and two staff accountants with direct supervision by the audit manager and partner.

Segment 2 - Year-end testing - substantive testing
During this phase of the audit, our principal objectives will be to assess the risk of material misstatement at the financial statement level and specific assertions, design overall responses to assessed risks and further audit procedures, perform substantive tests, as needed, and complete the audit and evaluate audit findings, if applicable.

In order to achieve the desired objectives of this phase of the audit, we will:

Determine whether our testing supports the assessed level of risk initially assigned at the financial statement level and at the assertion level.

Identify significant risks.

Develop a detailed audit plan.

AICPA
GAQC Member 16-
R1A
M S
363

Page 666 of 1234 ends

CITY OF BEAUMONT

PROPOSAL FOR PROFESSIONAL AUDITING SERVICES
Audit approach (continued)
Item 10.

Design substantive tests of account balances, designed and modified specifically for the City's operations and assessed level of risk. Substantive procedures will consist of testing balance sheet accounts, revenues and expenditures accounts along with various analytical procedures as deemed necessary. In addition, varies accounts made be confirmed with outside parties (cash, investments, etc.).

This phase of the engagement for the audit will be performed by the senior accountant and two/three staff accountants with direct supervision by the audit manager and partner.

Segment 3 - Reporting - report preparation/audit conclusion (workpaper review) During this phase of the audit, our principal objectives will be to evaluate whether the financial statements, taken as a whole, are free from material misstatement and form an opinion(s) and issue our report.

In order to achieve the desired objectives of this phase of the audit, we will:

Determine whether, based on our substantive testing and other procedures, the financial statements, taken as a whole, are free of material misstatement. This will provide the basis for our opinion(s).

Review all audit workpapers to ensure that the audit was performed in accordance with the required standards (GAAS, GAGAS, etc.).

Prepare drafts of all required reports by the agreed-upon dates.

Conduct an independent review of the financial statement draft by the engagement's quality control partner.

Issue all reports by the agreed-upon dates.

This phase of the engagement will be performed by the audit senior and one staff accountant with direct supervision by the audit manager and partner. In addition, the engagement's quality control partner will perform a detailed quality control review of the financial statements.

The above procedures are a general list of procedures to be performed. After our initial review of the City and our detailed risk assessment, we will customize the engagement and gear it towards the needs of the City and the audit itself. In doing so, we will determine which procedures to perform relative to our risk assessment.

All of our audits are customized to each entity, helping to ensure a complete, effective, and efficient audit. The foundation of the above approach is based on open communication coupled with a strong knowledge of the City's operations and detailed planning at the initial stages of the audit.

Our firm is dedicated to performing a timely audit engagement. Prior to the start of the audit, we will meet with City staff and decide on adequate timeframes, agreed upon by both the City and us, for the performance of the audit and the release of the financial statements. We will dedicate the necessary resources to meet any agree upon time frames.

46. GAQC Member 17-
MEI
364

Page 667 of 1234 ends

CITY OF BEAUMONT

PROPOSAL FOR PROFESSIONAL AUDITING SERVICES
IItem 10.

Audit approach (continued)
Level of staff and approximate number of hours assigned to each segment:

Segment Partner .- _ManageTr_ -Senior -Slag - - - Trat - Segment 1
Segment 2
Segment 3
Totals*
6 10
14 30
excludes Single Audit hours
Sample sizes
8 12
10 30
30 65 109
48 85 155
42 20 86
120 170 350
Our sample sizes will be determined in accordance with the AICPA's Audit and Accounting Guide, Audit Sampling, and will be selected using professional judgment as permitted by Statement on Auditing Standards.

Our methods are designed to provide the most audit coverage without expending excess time. Our sample sizes will depend upon our preliminary assessment of control risk, our planned substantive testing and analytical procedures as well as our professional judgement.

We utilize our Computer Aided Audit Tools (CAAT) software, Teammate Analytics, to draw our audit samples.

The software allows us to generate random samples, systematic samples, stratified samples, attributes samples as well as monetary unit samples (also called probability -proportional -to -size or dollar unit sampling).

Audit technology
We design our audits to be intelligent using our powerful audit software tools (Engagement and Teammate Analytics). This allows us to analyze large amounts of data in seconds. In addition, all audit team members are linked to each other using wireless connections (or a local router) which enables them to share information at an almost real-time speed. Below are benefits of our audit software:

We utilize Teammate Analytics, a suite of more than 150 dynamic Computer Aided Audit Tools CAATs). Using data received directly from the Department, we can perform the following:
search for duplicate checks, detect transactions occurring on holidays/weekends or during unusual hours, perform Benford's Law analysis, and identify instances when a vendor has issued multiple invoices with sequential references along with many other tests. The software empowers our audit teams with the ability to perform powerful, meaningful data analysis which will build upon our other value added services.

We can create our own analytical schedules allowing for easy analysis of current balances to prior year balance, current vs budget balance, thus reducing significant City staff time.

Once your trial balances and financial statements are entered into our software, we are able to observe your statements in the field allowing us to notice any variances and address them at your office.

We Zink the financial statement schedules directly to our audit software trial balances, and as a result, we can provide the City with fund financial statements almost immediately after importing the trial balances.

We can provide the City with our audited trial balances which show the coding of the financial statement schedules for ease of review for City staff. These reports show each account coded to a specific financial statement line item/function as well as journal entries posted during the audit.

AICPA
GAQC Member 18-
365

Page 668 of 1234 ends

CITY OF BEAUMONT

PROPOSAL FOR PROFESSIONAL AUDITING SERVICES
Item 10.

Audit approach (continued)
Analytical procedures
In order to properly utilize analytical procedures, industry background and knowledge are needed. With our firm's long history and qualified staff, we believe we have the necessary knowledge and experience to effectively apply analytical procedures. We will utilize analytical review procedures throughout our audit of the City. During the interim phase of our audit, we will compare current and prior year unadjusted balances to determine areas that may need additional analysis; we will also compare current year actual amounts to the City's annual budget. During the final phase of our audit, we will perform procedures similar to those mentioned above, as well as compare certain financial ratios for current and prior years. We will also conduct certain "reasonableness" tests. Any significant variances are investigated further through inquiry and other substantive testing as deemed necessary until resolved to our satisfaction. Finally, after we have completed our fieldwork, we will compare current and prior year audited balances, keeping in mind expected relationships obtained from our knowledge of the City and various other entities. In addition, we may choose to use various other analytical techniques such as trend analysis, etc.

Unlike other audit firms, we use analytical procedures to supplement our substantive testing, not supplant them.

Understanding of internal control over financial reporting Our approach to obtaining an understanding of the City's internal control over financial reporting will be performed in accordance with professional standards as promulgated by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants -- our understanding will include the Control Environment, Risk Assessment, Control Activities, Information and Communication, and Monitoring. We will use customized procedures which we have developed internally to evaluate your internal control systems. By combining our customized procedures and our detailed knowledge of the City and its environment, we will be able to provide constructive feedback in areas we feel need improvement. In addition to our customized procedures, we will also perform the following:

Control Environment. Through inquiry of the City's personnel, prompted by questionnaires, personal knowledge, and review of the minutes of the City's Council meetings, we will obtain an understanding of management's and the City Council's attitudes, awareness and actions concerning the control environment, focusing on the substance of the controls rather than their form.

Risk Assessment. Through inquiry of the City's personnel and the use of questionnaires, we will obtain sufficient knowledge of the City's risk assessment process to understand how management considers risks relevant to financial reporting objectives and decides upon actions to address those risks. This will include understanding how management identifies risks, estimates the significance of these risks, assesses the likelihood of their occurrence, and relates them to financial reporting.

Control Activities. Certain control procedures will be documented during our analysis of the control environment and the accounting system. However, many specific control procedures will still need to be documented that will focus primarily on the City's major transaction cycles. As mentioned above, we will test the City's control procedures on which we intend to rely on for safeguarding assets from unauthorized use or disposition and detecting/preventing unauthorized transactions. Any flow charts, organizational charts and any other manuals, programs, and financial and management information systems will be analyzed during this process.

AICPA
GAQC Member 19-
366

Page 669 of 1234 ends

CITY OF BEAUMONT

PROPOSAL FOR PROFESSIONAL AUDITING SERVICES
Item 10.

Audit approach (continued)
Information and Communication. Through inquiry of the City's personnel, we will identify the major types of transactions engaged in by the City. We will become familiar with the treatment of those transactions, including how the transactions are initiated, the related accounting records, and the manner of processing the transactions. Finally, we will obtain an understanding of the City's financial reporting process used to prepare financial reports, including the approaches used in making accounting estimates and disclosures.

Monitoring. Through inquiry of the City's personnel and the use of questionnaires, we will obtain sufficient knowledge of the major types of activities the City uses to monitor internal control over financial reporting. We will also determine how those activities are used to initiate corrective actions.

Approach in determining applicable laws and regulations We understand the importance of laws and regulations in planning an audit of a local government or not-for- profit entity and design all of our audits to ensure we test transactions for compliance. As part of our audit process, our audit team will obtain an understanding of the laws and regulations that will have a direct and material effect on the City's financial statements. In determining which laws and regulations are applicable to the City's financial statement audit, we will consult the following sources:

AICPA Audit and Accounting Guide, Audits of State and Local Governments California Government Code (investments, GANN limit requirements, etc.) U.S. Government Accountability Office's Government Auditing Standards (The Yellow Book), 2018 Revision
Applicable contracts/grants of the City
Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards OMB Uniform Guidance)
After consulting the applicable sources, we will design our audit to provide reasonable assurance of detecting material instances of noncompliance while continuing to refer back to the applicable compliance guideline to ensure changes in compliance are not missed.

Approach in drawing samples for compliance testing
Our approach to be taken in drawing audit samples for purposes of tests of compliance will depend on the number of transactions, the amounts of financial assistance provided (as applicable), and the City's internal controls over the respective programs. Our audits are designed to ensure we will select samples that will provide sufficient evidence of the City's compliance with the laws and regulations that will have a material effect on compliance with laws and regulations.

As previously mentioned, we utilize our CAAT software, Teammate Analytics, to draw our audit samples. The software allows us to pull random samples, systematic samples, stratified samples as well as monetary unit samples (also called probability -proportional -to -size or dollar unit sampling).

46. GAQC Member 20-
CIEL
367

Page 670 of 1234 ends

CITY OF BEAUMONT

PROPOSAL FOR PROFESSIONAL AUDITING SERVICES
Item 10.

IL I
Audit approach (continued)
Proposed audit timing
Auditor
transition:

Meet with
prior auditor
to review
work papers
Entrance
conference
to meet with
management
for pre -audit
planning.

Preliminary
risk
assessment
procedures.

Audit planning
Segment 1 -
Planning/internal
control
Segment 2 -
Substantive
testing/analysis
Segment 3 -
Report
preparation/work
a•er review
May
Obtain an understanding of
systems, internal controls,
and current -year issues.

Assess and evaluate design
and implementation of key
internal controls (including
IT related).

Perform tests of internal
controls as needed.

Identity control deficiencies
Perform detailed risk
assessment procedures.

Draft internal control
comment letter
Develop detailed audit plan
provide management with
a detailed listing of items
needed to perform the audit,
including the timing of when
items are needed.

Anticipated timing of each segment
Specific expertise desired
October November/December
Perform substantive audit •
fieldwork.

Perform substantive
analytical procedures.

Consider whether audit
evidence is sufficient to
form an opinion. •
Conduct exit conference •
with management to
discuss proposed entries,
internal control issues, etc.

Determine whether, based
on our substantive testing
and other procedures, the
financial statements, taken
as a whole, are free of
material misstatement.

Review all workpapers.

Evaluate financial
statements and note
disclosures.

Perform final analytical
procedures.

Draft required reports.

Issue final required reports
by or before agreed upon
date.

Present to Council as
needed.

Almost all of our City clients have development impact fees, we are very familiar with the required accounting, reporting and financial reporting for those funds.

Also, our partners have seen and dealt with a variety of debt issuances throughout the years, including Community Facilities Bonds, Certificates of Participation, Revenue Bonds, Variable Rate Bonds, Tax Anticipation Notes, to name a few.
t r
AICPA
GAQC Member 21-
ISE
368

Page 671 of 1234 ends

CITY OF BEAUMONT

PROPOSAL FOR PROFESSIONAL AUDITING SERVICES
Item 10.

References
Entity: City of Claremont
Scope of work:

Date:

Engagement partner
Total hours:

Contact person:

Financial Audit/CAFR*/Successor Agency
Year ending June 30, 2016 - present
Mr. Brad Welebir
Approximately 400 hours
Mr. Adam Pirrie, Finance Director, (909) 399-5328,
[email protected]
Entity: City of Thousand Oaks
Scope of work:

Date:

Engagement partner:

Total hours:

Contact person:

Financial Audit/CAFR*/Successor Agency/Single Audit
Year ending June 30, 2018 - present
Mr. Terry Shea
Approximately 440 hours
Ms. Elisa Magana, Accounting Manager, (805) 449-2216,
[email protected]
Entity: City of San Marcos
Scope of work:

Date:

Engagement partner:

Total hours:

Contact person:

Scope of work:

Date:

Engagement partner:

Total hours:

Contact person:

City CAFR/Single Audit
Year ending June 30, 2014 - present
Mr. Scott Manno
Approximately 600 hours
Lisa Fowler, Finance Director, (760) 744-1050, Lfowler@san- marcos.net
City of La Mesa
Financial Audit/Single Audit
Year ending June 30, 2011 - present
Mr. Scott Manno
Approximately 325 hours each year
Mrs. Sarah Waller -Bullock, Director of Finance, (619) 667-1125, s bullock@cityoflamesa
Entity: City of Loma Linda
Scope of work: Financial Audit/RDA/Successor Agency
Date: Years ending June 30, 2013 - present
Engagement partner. Mr. Terry Shea
Total hours: Approximately 225 hours each year
Ms. Diana DeAnda, Finance Director/Treasurer, (909) 799-2840, [email protected]
Contact person:
received GFOAICSMFO award.

See Attachment A for a listing of current and recent government clients served.

AICPA
GAQC Metaiber 22- IMO
369

Page 672 of 1234 ends

CITY OF BEAUMONT

PROPOSAL FOR PROFESSIONAL AUDITING SERVICES
Item 10.

References (continued)
Entity:

Scope of vwrk:

Date:

Engagement partner:

Total hours:

Contact person:

City of El Cajon
City CAFR*/Successor Agency/Public Financing Authority/Single Audit/GANN limit/Measure 0
Years ending June 30, 2008 - present
Mr. Scott Manno
Approximately 500 hours each year
Ms. Victoria Danganan, Finance Manager, (619) 441-1763
Entity: Town of Yucca Valley
Scope of work:

Date:

Engagement partner:

Total hours:

Contact person:

Financial Audit/CAFR*/Successor Agency
Years ending June 30, 2008 - present
Mr. Scott Manno
Approximately 350 hours each year
Mr. Curtis Yakimow, Town Manager (760) 369-7207
Entity: City of Exeter
Scope of Work:

Date:

Engagement partner:

Total hours:

Contact Person:

Scope of work:

Date:

Engagement partner:

Total hours:

Contact Person:

Financial Audit/Transportation Fund Audit
Years ending June 30, 2018 - present
Mr. Scott Manno
Approximately 200 hours each year
Mr. Chris Tavarez, Finance Director, (559) 592-2755
City of San Jacinto
Financial Audit/ Single Audit/Successor Agency
Years ending June 30, 2011 - present
Mr. Scott Manno
Approximately 300 hours each year
Mr. Tom Prill, Finance Manager, (951) 487-7330
Entity: City of Sierra Madre
Scope of Inc*:

Date:

Engagement partner.

Total hours:

Contact person:

AICPA
GAQC Member
Financial Audit/CAFR*
Year ending June 30, 2012 - present
Mr. Scott Manno
Approximately 300 hours each year
Mr. Colby Konisek, Finance Director (626) 355-7135
23-
370

Page 673 of 1234 ends

CITY OF BEAUMONT

PROPOSAL FOR PROFESSIONAL AUDITING SERVICES
Item 10.

Contract terms
We have read the terms and conditions of the provided contract and have an issue with the following:

12. Ownership of Documents; Audit.

All draft and final reports, plans, drawings, studies, maps, photographs, specifications, data, notes, manuals, warranties and all other documents of any kind or nature prepared, developed or obtained by CONTRACTOR in connection with the performance of Services performed for the CITY shall become the sole property of CITY, and CONTRACTOR shall promptly deliver all such materials to CITY upon request. At the CITY's sole discretion, CONTRACTOR may be permitted to retain original documents, and furnish reproductions to CITY upon request, at no cost to CITY.

Subject to applicable federal and state laws, rules and regulations, CITY shall hold all intellectual property rights to any materials developed pursuant to this Agreement. CONTRACTOR shall not such use data or documents for purposes other than the performance of this Agreement, nor shall CONTRACTOR release, reproduce, distribute, publish, adapt for future use or any other purposes, or otherwise use, any data or other materials first produced in performance of this Agreement, nor authorize others to do so, without the prior written consent of CITY.

Per professional standards, audit documentation is the property of the auditor. Audit documentation is the auditor's evidence of the procedures performed, evidence obtained, and conclusions reached. However, the auditor may make available to the City, at the auditor's discretion, copies of the audit documentation, provided such disclosure does not undermine the effectiveness and integrity of the audit process. If the language that is currently in the contract is included, that opens our workpapers to a possible FOA request since they are the "property of the City".
411._ AICPA
GAQC Member 24-
371

Page 674 of 1234 ends

CITY OF BEAUMONT

PROPOSAL FOR PROFESSIONAL AUDITING SERVICES
Item 10.

Cost summary
Cost Summary
Not to exceed price for proposed services schedule
In accordance with the Request for Proposal for Audit Services issued by the City of Beaumont, the firm referenced below hereby submits the following cost proposal:

Basic report to be issued
City audit, including CAFR and related reports
Fiscal ears endin3 June 30,
Option years
2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
46,200 $ 46,200 $ 47,350 $ 48,200 $ 48,200
Total $ 46,200 $ 46,200 $ 47,350 $ 48,200 $ 48,200
Additional Audit Reports to be Requested at City Option:

Single Audit* and related reports $ 4,910 $ 4,910 $ 5,025 $ 5,100 $ 5,100 Annual Report of City Financial Transactions to SCR 2,580 2,580 2,635 2,685 2,685 Total $ 7,490 $ 7,490 $ 7,660 $ 7,785 $ 7,785
for the first major program, each additional major program $3,250.

Rates for additional professional services:

Position
Hourly Estimated Estimated
rate hours* charges
Partner $ 280 30 $ 8,400
Manager 190 30 5,700
Senior accountant 140 120 16,800
Staff accountant 90 170 15,300
excludes Single audit and SCR
I hereby certify that the undersigned is authorized to represent the firm stated above, and empowered to submit this bid, and if selected, is authorized to sign a contract with the City, for the services identified in the Request for Proposals.

Firm name: Rovers Anderson Malod4 & Scott, LLP
Signature:

Printed name: Scott W. Manno, CPA, CGMA
Title: Partner
Date: April 3, 2020
We have no specific, separate cost elements.

AICPA
GAQC Member 25-
372

Page 675 of 1234 ends

Government Client
Attachmen

GOVERNMENT CLIENTS SERVED
CSMFO/
GFOA Successor Housing
Years Served Awards Agency Authority
City of El Cajon 06/30/07 to 06/30/19 Yes Yes Yes
City of Exeter 06/30/17 to 06/30/19
City of Woodlake 06/30/17 to 06/30/19
Town of Yucca Valley 06/30/08 to 06/30/19 Yes Yes Yes
City of La Verne 06/30/11 to 06/30/19 Yes Yes Yes
City of San Jacinto 06/30/11 to 06/30/19 Yes Yes
City of Twentynine Palms 06/30/11 to 06/30/19 Yes Yes Yes City of La Mesa 06/30/11 to 06/30/19 Yes Yes
City of Menifee 06/30/14 to 06/30/19 Yes
City of San Marcos 06/30/14 to 06/30/19 Yes Yes Yes
City of Redondo Beach 06/30/12 to 06/30/16 Yes Yes Yes
City of Loma Linda 06/30/13 to 06/30/19 Yes Yes Yes
City of Sierra Madre 06/30/12 to 06/30/19 Yes Yes Yes
Successor Agency to the County of SB 06/30/14 to 06/30/19 City of Hawthorne 06/30/16 to 06/30/19 Yes Yes Yes
City of West Covina 06/30/16 to 06/30/19 Yes Yes Yes
City of Aliso Viejo 06/30/16 to 06/30/19 Yes No No
City of Claremont 06/30/16 to 06/30/19 Yes Yes Yes
City of Thousand Oaks 06/30/18 06/30/19 Yes Yes Yes
City of South Pasadena 06/30/18 06/30/19 Yes Yes
City of Rolling Hills Estates 06/30/19
City of Poway 06/30/14 to 06/30/19 Yes Yes Yes
City of Capitola 06/30/12 to 06/30/18 Yes Yes Yes
City of Fillmore 06/30/08 to 06/30/18 Yes Yes Yes
City of San Juan Capistrano 06/30/11 to 06/30/15 Yes Yes Yes City of Chino 06/30/11 to 06/30/16 Yes Yes Yes
City of Rosemead 06/30/11 to 06/30/17 Yes Yes Yes
City of Moorpark 06/30/12 to 06/30/17 Yes Yes Yes
City of Mission Viejo 06/30/12 to 06/30/15 Yes Yes Yes
Crestline Village Water District 04/30/96 to 04/30/19
Crestline -Lake Arrowhead Water 06/30/98 to 06/30/19
San Bernardino Valley Muni Water District 06/30/04 to 06/30/19 Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District 06/30/15 to 06/30/19 Yes Ventura Regional Sanitation District 06/30/07 to 06/30/19 Yes Saticoy Sanitary District 06/30/07 to 06/30/19
Pine Cove Water District 06/30/10 to 06/30/19
Western Municipal Water District 06/30/11 to 06/30/16 Yes WRCRWA 06/30/11 to 06/30/16
Vista Irrigation District 06/30/11 to 06/30/16 Yes
Idyllwild Water District 06/30/11 to 06/30/19
Vallecitos Water District 06/30/15 to 06/30/18 Yes
29 Palms Water District 06/30/12 to 06/30/15
Big Bear Area Regional Wastewater 06/30/12 to 06/30/19 Yes Beaumont Basin Watermaster 06/30/13 to 06/30/19
Mojave Water Agency 6/30/2019
Item 10.
373

Page 676 of 1234 ends

GOVERNMENT CLIENTS SERVED (continued)
Government Client
Costa Mesa Sanitary District
Beaumont Cherry Valley Water District
United Water Conservation Agency
Inland Empire Resource Cons. District
Rosamond Community Services District
Rossmoor Community Services District
Rim of the World Park & Rec. District
Ventura County Regional Energy
Heartlands Communications Fac Auth
Heartlands Fire Training Authority
Consolidated Fire Agencies
Riverside County Habitat Con. Agency
Santa Ana Watershed Association
SB Fire Training Authority
Capistrano Bay Community Services
District
Ventura County Public Fin Authority
Nipomo Community Services District
SBIAA
West Valley San Bernardino Water
District
WRCOG
San Diego Workforce Partnership
Rubidoux Community Services District
CSUSB - Student Union
CSUSB - Associated Students Inc.

CSUSB - Philanthropic Foundation
CSUSB - University Enterprise Corp.

Helendale Community Services District
Conejo Recreation and Park District
Upper San Gabriel Valley MWD
March Joint Powers Authority
Chino Basin Desalter Authority
Mountains Recreation and Conservation
Running Springs Water District
Phelan Pinon Hills Community Services
District
Years Served
06/30/15
12/31/17
06/30/15
06/30/04
06/30/15
06/30/05
06/30/06
06/30/07
06/30/07
06/30/07
06/30/14
06/30/15
12/31/09
06/30/10
06/30/13
06/30/12
06/30/16
06/30/17
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
06/30/17
12/31/18
06/30/19
06/30/16
06/30/19
06/30/19
06/30/19
06/30/19
06/30/19
06/30/19
06/30/19
06/30/19
12/31/18
06/30/15
Attachmen
Continued)
Item 10.

CSMFO/
GFOA Successor Housing
Awards Agency Authority
Yes
Yes
Yes
to 06/30/19
to 06/30/19
to 06/30/19 Yes
to 06/30/19
06/30/17 to 06/30/19
06/30/17 to 06/30/19
06/30/16 to 06/30/19
06/30/16 to 06/30/19
06/30/05 to 06/30/19
06/30/10 to 06/30/19
06/30/11 to 06/30/19
06/30/11 to 06/30/19
06/30/10 to 06/30/18
06/30/19
06/30/19
06/30/19
06/30/19
06/30/19
Accounting support
Accounting support
Yes
374

Page 677 of 1234 ends

735 E. Carnegie Dr. Suite 100
San Bernardino, CA 92408
909 889 0871 T
909 889 5341 F
ramscpa.net

PARTNERS
Brenda L. Odle, CPA, MST
Terry P. Shea. CPA
Scott W. Manno, CPA, CGMA
Leena Shanbhag, CPA. MST, CGMA
Bradferd A. Welebir. CPA, MBA, CGMA
Jenny W. Liu, CPA, MST
Jay 1-1, Zercher, CPA (Partner Emeritus)
Phillip H. Waller, CPA (Partner Emeritus)
Virk A. Franks. CPA (Partner Emeritus)

MANAGERS / STAFF
Charles De Simoni, CPA
Gardenya Duan, CPA
Breanna Schultz, CPA
Jingjie Wu, CPA
Evelyn Morentin-Barcena, CPA
Veronica Hernandez, CPA
Tara R. Thorp. CPA, MSA
Laura Arvizu, CPA
Ye Ying Stella Xia, CPA. MSBA
Louis Fernandez, CPA
Abigail O. Hernandez Conde, CPA. MSA
Zoe Xinlu Zhang, CPA, MSA

MEMBER OF
AL•
GROUP
A Worldwide Alliance of Independent
Accounting, Law and Consulting Firms
R
M
ROGERS, ANDERSON„ MALODY & SCOTT, LLP
CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS, SINCE 1948
May 20, 2020
To the Honorable City Council
City of Beaumont
Beaumont, California
The following represents our understanding of the services we will provide the City of Beaumont.

You have requested that we audit the governmental activities, business -type activities, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the City of Beaumont (the City), as of June 30, 2020, and for the year then ended and the related notes, which collectively comprise the City's basic financial statements as listed in the table of contents. We are pleased to confirm our acceptance and our understanding of this audit engagement by means of this letter. Our audit will be conducted with the objective of our expressing an opinion on each opinion unit applicable to those basic financial statements.

Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S.

GAAP), as promulgated by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board GASB) require that supplementary information, such as management's discussion and analysis (MD&A) and budgetary comparison information be presented to supplement the basic financial statements. Such information, although not a part of the basic financial statements, is required by the GASB, who considers it to be an essential part of financial reporting for placing the basic financial statements in an appropriate operational, economic, or historical context.

As part of our engagement, we will apply certain limited procedures to the required supplementary information (RSI) in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAS). These limited procedures will consist primarily of inquiries of management regarding their methods of measurement and presentation, and comparing the information for consistency with management's responses to our inquiries. We will not express an opinion or provide any form of assurance on the RSI. The following RSI is required by U.S.

GAAP. This RSI will be subjected to certain limited procedures but will not be audited:

1. Management's Discussion and Analysis

2. General and Major Fund Budgetary Comparison Schedules

3. Pension Related Schedules
1 TABILITY. ACC(JRACY. TRUST.

Item 10.
375

Page 678 of 1234 ends

EXHIBIT "B"

ENGAGEMENT LETTER
insert behind this page)

Page 679 of 1234 ends

735 E. Carnegie Dr. Suite 100
San Bernardino, CA 92408
909 889 0871 T
909 889 5361 F
ramscpa. net

PARTNERS
Brenda L. Odle, CPA, MST
Terry P. Shea, CPA
Scott W. Manno, CPA. CGMA
Leena Shanbhag, CPA, MST, CGMA
Bradferd A. Welebir, CPA, MBA, CGMA
Jenny W. Liu, CPA, MST
Jay H. Zercher. CPA (Partner Emeritus)
Phillip H. Waller, CPA (Partner Emeritus)
Kirk A. Franks, CPA (Partner Emeritus)
MANAGERS f STAFF
Charles De Simoni, CPA
Gardenya Duran, CPA
Brianna Schultz, CPA
Jingjie Wu, CPA
Evelyn Morentin-Barcena. CPA
Veronica Hernandez, CPA
Tara R. Thorp. CPA, MSA
Laura Arvizu. CPA
Ye Ying Stella Xia, CPA, MSBA
Louis Fernandez, CPA
Abigail O. Hernandez. Conde, CPA, MSA.

Zoe. Xinlu Zhang, CPA. MSA

MEMBERS
American Institute of
Certified Public Accountants
PCPS The AICPA Alliance
for CPA Firms
Governmental Audit
Quality Center
Employee Benefit Plan
Audit Quality Center
California Society of
Certified Public Accountants

MEMBER OF
AL
GROUP
A Worldwide Alliance of Independent
Accounting, Law and Consulting Finns
R
M

ROGERS, ANDERSON, MALODY & SCOTT, LLP
CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS, SINCE 1948
May 20, 2020
To the Honorable City Council
City of Beaumont
Beaumont, California
The following represents our understanding of the services we will provide the City of Beaumont.

Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S.

GAAP. This RSI will be subjected to certain limited procedures but will not be audited:

1. Management's Discussion and Analysis

2. General and Major Fund Budgetary Comparison Schedules

3. Pension Related Schedules
1 STABILITY. ACCURACY. TRUST

Page 680 of 1234 ends

Honorable City Council
City of Beaumont
Supplementary information other than RSI will accompany the City's basic financial statements. We will subject the following supplementary information to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and certain additional procedures, including comparing and reconciling such information directly to the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the basic financial statements themselves, and additional procedures in accordance with U.S. GAAS. We intend to provide an opinion on the supplementary information in relation to the basic financial statements as a whole:

1. Non -major Combined Schedules
Auditor Responsibilities
We will conduct our audit in accordance with U.S. GAAS, and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the basic financial statements are free from material misstatement. An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the basic financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor's judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the basic financial statements, whether due to fraud or error, misappropriation of assets, or violations of laws, governmental regulations, grant agreements, or contractual agreements.

An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used, and the reasonableness of significant accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the basic financial statements. If appropriate, our procedures will therefore include tests of documentary evidence that support the transactions recorded in the accounts, tests of the physical existence of inventories, and direct confirmation of cash, investments, and certain other assets and liabilities by correspondence with creditors and financial institutions. As part of our audit process, we will request written representations from your attorneys, and they may bill you for responding. At the conclusion of our audit, we will also request certain written representations from you about the basic financial statements and related matters.

Because of the inherent limitations of an audit, together with the inherent limitations of internal control, an unavoidable risk that some material misstatements (whether caused by errors, fraudulent financial reporting, misappropriation of assets, or violations of laws or governmental regulations) may not be detected exists, even though the audit is properly planned and performed in accordance with U.S. GAAS and Government Auditing Standards.

In making our risk assessments, we consider internal control relevant to the entity's preparation and fair presentation of the basic financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity's internal control. However, we will communicate to you in writing concerning any significant deficiencies or material weaknesses in internal control relevant to the audit of the basic financial statements that we have identified during the audit. Our responsibility as auditors is, of course, limited to the period covered by our audit and does not extend to any other periods.

We cannot provide assurance that unmodified opinions will be expressed. Circumstances may arise in which it is necessary for us to modify our opinions or add emphasis -of -matter or other -matter paragraphs.

If our opinions on the basic financial statements are other than unmodified, we will discuss the reasons with you in advance. If, for any reason, we are unable to complete the audit or are unable to form or have not formed opinions, we may decline to express opinions or to issue a report as a result of this engagement.
2

Page 681 of 1234 ends

Honorable City Council
City of Beaumont
Compliance with Laws and Regulations
As previously discussed, as part of obtaining reasonable assurance about whether the basic financial statements are free of material misstatement, we will perform tests of the City's compliance with the provisions of applicable laws, regulations, contracts, and agreements. However, the objective of our audit will not be to provide an opinion on overall compliance and we will not express such an opinion.

Management's Responsibilities
Our audit will be conducted on the basis that management acknowledge and understand that they have responsibility:

1. For the preparation and fair presentation of the basic financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America;

2. For the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of basic financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to error, fraudulent financial reporting, misappropriation of assets, or violations of laws, governmental regulations, grant agreements, or contractual agreements; and

3. To provide us with:
a. Access to all information of which management is aware that is relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of the basic financial statements such as records, documentation, and other matters;
b. Additional information that we may request from management for the purpose of the audit; and
c. Unrestricted access to persons within the entity from whom we determine it necessary to obtain audit evidence.

4. For including the auditor's report in any document containing basic financial statements that indicates that such basic financial statements have been audited by the entity's auditor;

5. For identifying and ensuring that the entity complies with the laws and regulations applicable to its activities;

6. For adjusting the basic financial statements to correct material misstatements and confirming to us in the management representation letter that the effects of any uncorrected misstatements aggregated by us during the current engagement and pertaining to the current year period(s) under audit are immaterial, both individually and in the aggregate, to the basic financial statements as a whole; and

7. For acceptance of nonattest services, including identifying the proper party to oversee nonattest work;

8. For maintaining adequate records, selecting and applying accounting principles, and safeguarding assets;

9. For informing us of any known or suspected fraud affecting the entity involving management, employees with significant role in internal control and others where fraud could have a material effect on the financials; and

10. For the accuracy and completeness of all information provided. 3

Page 682 of 1234 ends

Honorable City Council
City of Beaumont
With regard to the supplementary information referred to above, you acknowledge and understand your responsibility: (a) for the preparation of the supplementary information in accordance with the applicable criteria; (b) to provide us with the appropriate written representations regarding supplementary information; c) to include our report on the supplementary information in any document that contains the supplementary information and that indicates that we have reported on such supplementary information; and (d) to present the supplementary information with the audited basic financial statements, or if the supplementary information will not be presented with the audited basic financial statements, to make the audited basic financial statements readily available to the intended users of the supplementary information no later than the date of issuance by you of the supplementary information and our report thereon.

As part of our audit process, we will request from management written confirmation concerning representations made to us in connection with the audit.

Reporting
We will issue a written report upon completion of our audit of the City's basic financial statements. Our report will be addressed to the City Council. We cannot provide assurance that unmodified opinions will be expressed. Circumstances may arise in which it is necessary for us to modify our opinions, add an emphasis -of -matter or other -matter paragraph(s), or withdraw from the engagement.

We also will issue a written report on the Appropriations Limit upon completion of our audit.

In accordance with the requirements of Government Auditing Standards, we will also issue a written report describing the scope of our testing over internal control over financial reporting and over compliance with laws, regulations, and provisions of grants and contracts, including the results of that testing. However, providing an opinion on internal control and compliance will not be an objective of the audit and, therefore, no such opinion will be expressed.

Other
We understand that your employees will prepare all confirmations we request and will locate any documents or support for any other transactions we select for testing.

If you intend to publish or otherwise reproduce the financial statements in a format other than that provided by us, and make reference to our firm, you agree to provide us with printers' proofs or masters for our review and approval before printing. You also agree to provide us with a copy of the final reproduced material for our approval before it is distributed. Regarding the electronic dissemination of audited financial statements, including financial statements published electronically on your Internet website, you understand that electronic sites are a means to distribute information and, therefore, we are not required to read the information contained in these sites or to consider the consistency of other information in the electronic site with the original document.

We will assist management with drafting the financial statements based on the City's trial balances and preparing the State Controller's Annual Financial Transactions Report. With respect to this or any nonattest services we perform, the City's management is responsible for (a) making all management decisions and performing all management functions; (b) assigning a competent individual to oversee the services; (c) evaluating the adequacy of the services performed; (d) evaluating and accepting responsibility for the results of the services performed; and (e) establishing and maintaining internal controls, including monitoring ongoing activities. We will not assume management responsibilities on behalf of the City.

Government Auditing Standards require that we document an assessment of the skills, knowledge, and experience of management, should we participate in any form of preparation of the basic financial statements and related schedules or disclosures as these actions are deemed a non -audit service. 4

Page 683 of 1234 ends

Honorable City Council
City of Beaumont
In addition, we will perform an agreed upon procedures engagement related to City's Appropriations Limit.

The procedures have been agreed to by the City and the League of California Cities (as presented in the publication entitled Agreed-upon Procedures Applied to the Appropriations Limitation Prescribed by Article X111B of the California Constitution) and will be performed solely to assist the City in meeting the requirements of Section 1.5 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution. The City's management will be responsible for the Appropriations Limit worksheet.

If it is determined a Single Audit is needed subsequent to this engagement letter, we will provide the City with another engagement letter covering the terms and conditions related to a Single Audit and the Uniform Guidance.

Provisions of Engagement Administration, Timing and Fees During the course of the engagement, we may communicate with you or your personnel via fax or e-mail, and you should be aware that communication in those mediums contains a risk of misdirected or intercepted communications.

Our firm may transmit confidential information that you provided us to third parties in order to facilitate delivering our services to you. We have obtained confidentiality agreements with all our service providers to maintain the confidentiality of your information and we will take reasonable precautions to determine that they have the appropriate procedures in place to prevent the unauthorized release of confidential information to others. We will remain responsible for the work provided by any third -party service providers used under this agreement. By your signature below, you consent to having confidential information transmitted to entities outside the firm. Please feel free to inquire if you would like additional information regarding the transmission of confidential information to entities outside the firm.

Scott Manno, CPA, CGMA is the engagement partner for the audit services specified in this letter. His responsibilities include supervising Rogers, Anderson, Malody & Scott, LLP's services performed as part of this engagement and signing or authorizing another qualified firm representative to sign the audit report.

Our fee for the audit will be $46,200 for the audit and $2,580 for the financial transactions report to the State Controller's Office. We will notify you immediately of any circumstances we encounter that could significantly affect this initial fee estimate. Whenever possible, we will attempt to use the City's personnel to assist in the preparation of schedules and analyses of accounts. This effort could substantially reduce our time requirements and facilitate the timely conclusion of the audit. Further, we will be available during the year to consult with you on financial management and accounting matters of a routine nature.

If during the engagement, the City desires an expanded scope of testing related to any audit area, we will meet with City staff and come to a mutually agree upon fee prior to any additional procedures being performed (including a separate engagement letter).

During the course of the audit we may observe opportunities for economy in, or improved controls over, your operations. We will bring such matters to the attention of the appropriate level of management, either orally or in writing.

You agree to inform us of facts that may affect the basic financial statements of which you may become aware during the period from the date of the auditor's report to the date the financial statements are issued.

To ensure that Rogers, Anderson, Malody & Scott, LLP's independence is not impaired under the AICPA Code of Professional Conduct, you agree to inform the engagement partner before entering into any substantive employment discussions with any of our personnel.

We agree to retain our audit documentation or work papers for a period of at least seven years from the date of our report. Upon expiration of this period, we will be free to destroy our records related to the engagement. However, we do not keep original client documents, so we will return those as they are used during each engagement. It is management's responsibility to retain and protect the records for possible future use, including examination by regulators and federal agencies. 5

Page 684 of 1234 ends

Honorable City Council
City of Beaumont
We require that a copy of the final trial balance (i.e., a trial balance ready to audit) be delivered to us at least 10 business days prior to the start of the audit, otherwise we may reschedule the start of the audit.

At the conclusion of our audit engagement, we will communicate to the City Council the following significant findings from the audit:

Our view about the qualitative aspects of the entity's significant accounting practices; Significant difficulties, if any, encountered during the audit; Uncorrected misstatements, other than those we believe are trivial, if any; Disagreements with management, if any;
Other findings or issues, if any, arising from the audit that are, in our professional judgment, significant and relevant to those charged with governance regarding their oversight of the financial reporting process;
Material, corrected misstatements that were brought to the attention of management as a result of our audit procedures;
Representations we requested from management;
Management's consultations with other accountants, if any; and Significant issues, if any, arising from the audit that were discussed, or the subject of correspondence, with management
The audit documentation for this engagement is the property of Rogers, Anderson, Malody & Scott, LLP and constitutes confidential information. However, we may be requested to make certain audit documentation available to regulators and federal agencies and to the U.S. Government Accountability Office pursuant to authority given to it by law or regulation, or to peer reviewers. If requested, access to such audit documentation will be provided under the supervision of Rogers, Anderson, Malody & Scott, LLP's personnel. Furthermore, upon request, we may provide copies of selected audit documentation to the regulators. The regulators may intend, or decide, to distribute the copies of information contained therein to others, including other governmental agencies.

In accordance with the requirements of Government Auditing Standards, we have attached a copy of our latest external peer review report of our firm for your consideration and files.

Please sign and return this letter to indicate your acknowledgment of, and agreement with, the arrangements for our audit of the financial statements including our respective responsibilities. Keep a copy for your records.

We appreciate the opportunity to be your financial statement auditors and look forward to working with you and your staff.

Respectfully,

ROGERS, ANDERSON, MALODY & SCOTT, LLP
Scott Manno, CPA, CGMA
Partner
6

Page 685 of 1234 ends

Honorable City Council
City of Beaumont
RESPONSE:

This letter correctly sets forth our understanding.

Acknowledged and agreed on behalf ofit )f Beaumont by:

Name:

Title:

Date: 7, 201-o
7

Page 686 of 1234 ends

Grant Bennett Associates

A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
Report on the Firm's System of Quality Control
May 15, 2018
To the Partners of Rogers, Anderson, Malody & Scott, LLP and the Peer Review Committee of the California Society of CPAs:

We have reviewed the system of quality control for the accounting and auditing practice of Rogers, Anderson, Malody & Scott, LLP (the firm) in effect for the year ended November 30, 2017. Our peer review was conducted in accordance with the Standards for Performing and Reporting on Peer Reviews established by the Peer Review Board of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (Standards).

A summary of the nature, objectives, scope, limitations of, and the procedures performed in a System Review as described in the Standards may be found at www.aicpa.org/prsummary . The summary also includes an explanation of how engagements identified as not performed or reported in conformity with applicable professional standards, if any, are evaluated by a peer reviewer to determine a peer review rating.

Firm's Responsibility
The firm is responsible for designing a system of quality control and complying with it to provide the firm with reasonable assurance of performing and reporting in conformity with applicable professional standards in all material respects. The firm is also responsible for evaluating actions to promptly remediate engagements deemed as not performed or reported in conformity with professional standards, when appropriate, and for remediating weaknesses in its system of quality control, if any.

Peer Reviewer's Responsibility
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the design of the system of quality control and the firm's compliance therewith based on our review.

Required Selections and Considerations
Engagements selected for review included engagements performed under Government Auditing Standards, including a compliance audit under the Single Audit Act and an audit of an employee benefit plan.

As a part of our peer review, we considered reviews by regulatory entities as communicated by the firm, if applicable, in determining the nature and extent of our procedures.

Opinion
In our opinion, the system of quality control for the accounting and auditing practice of Rogers, Anderson, Malody & Scott, LLP in effect for the year ended November 30, 2017, has been suitably designed and complied with to provide the firm with reasonable assurance of performing and reporting in conformity with applicable professional standards in all material respects. Firms can receive a rating of pass, pass with deficiency(ies) or fail.

Rogers, Anderson, Malody & Scott, LLP has received a peer review rating of pass.

Aita•A1A0

GRANT BENNETT ASSOCIATES

A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
Certified Public Accountants
GBA
C P A
www.gbacpa.com
1375 Exposition Boulevard, Suite 230 P.O. Box 223096
Sacramento, CA 95815 Princeville, HI 96722
916/922-5109 FAX 916/641-5200 888/769-7323

Page 687 of 1234 ends

EXHIBIT "C"

CERTIFICATES OF INSURANCE AND ENDORSEMENTS A
insert behind this page)

Page 688 of 1234 ends

ACORO"
ROGEAND-01
CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE DATE ( Item 10.

Sitar usv
THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS

CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER.

IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must have ADDITIONAL INSURED provisions or be endorsed.

If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s).

CONTACT
NAME:

PHONENC, No, Ext): (951) 281-5353
E-MAILADDRESS:

PRODUCER
Orion Business Insurance and Risk Management Services, Inc. 1250 Corona Pointe Court, Suite 302
Corona, CA 92879

INSURED
Rogers, Anderson, Malody & Scott LLP
735 E. Carnegie Drive
Suite 100
San Bernardino, CA 92408
Fitt,n0):(951) 737-5083

INSURERISJ AFFORDING COVERAGE
INSURER A :Sentinel Insurance Company
INSURER B : Insurance Company of the West
INSURER c : Travelers Indemnity Company
INSURER D :

INSURER E :

INSURER F :

NAIC #
11000
27847
25658
COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER: REVISION NUMBER:

THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS

CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS.

INSR ADDL MIDR
POLICY NUMBER POLICY EFF IMMLICfrDDYNEXP LIMITSTYPEOFINSURANCE

A X COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY

CLAIMS -MADE X OCCUR
GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER:

POLICY JET LOC
OTHER:

A AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY

ANY AUTO

OWNEDAUTOS ONLY SCHEDULED
AUTOS

X AUTOS ONLY X AUTOONLY

UMBRELLA LIAB X OCCUR

X EXCESS LIAB CLAIMS -MADE
DED X RETENTION $ 10,000
72SBAAR7403 1/1/2020 1 /112021
72SBAAR7403 1/1/2020
72SBAAR7403

B WORKERS COMPENSATION

AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY

ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE
OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED?
Mandatory in NH)
If yes, describe under
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below
Y/N
N/A
WSD 5035483 03
EACH OCCURRENCE $

DAMAGE TO RENTED
PREMISES (Ea occurrence $
MED EXP (Any one person/ $
PERSONAL & ADV INJURY $
GENERAL AGGREGATE $
PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGG $

COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT
Ea accident,
1/1/2021 BODILY INJURY , Per person,
BODILY INJURY i Per accident

PROPERTY DAMAGE
y Per accident,
1,000,000
1,000,000
10,000
1,000,000
2,000,000
2,000,000
1,000,000
EACH OCCURRENCE $
1/1/2020 1/1/2021
AGGREGATE $
3,000,000
3,000,000
C Errors & Omissions 106850737
1/1/2020 1/1/2021
1/1/2020 111/2021 See Description

X STATUTE ERTH
E.L. EACH ACCIDENT $
E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE $
E.L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT $
1,000,000
1,000,000
1,000,000
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS / LOCATIONS / VEHICLES (ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, may be attached if more space is required) Evidence of Insurance

CERTIFICATE HOLDER
City Of Beaumont
550 E. 6th Street
Beaumont, CA 92223

CANCELLATION

SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE

THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS.

AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
ACORD 25 (2016/03) © 1988-2015 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights n The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD
383

Page 689 of 1234 ends

Page 690 of 1234 ends

Page 691 of 1234 ends

Page 692 of 1234 ends

QUOTE WORKSHEETVENDOR INFORMATIONVENDOR 1Vendor Name & Address:Rogers, Anderson, Malody & Scott, LLP735E. Carnegie Dr., Suite 100San Bernardino, CA 92408Harshwal & Company11405 W. Bernardo Ct., Ste. ASan Diego, CA 92127Eadie & Payne3880 Lemon Street, Ste. 300Riverside, CA 92501Person Quoting:Scott W. Manno Sanwar Harshwal Elaine AveryItem DescriptionFees Extension ExtensionCity Audit, ACFR Prep55,800.00$ $55,000.00 $54,250.00Single Audit5,750.00$ $10,000.00 $5,000.00Ea Addtl. Major Program**3,250.00$ $5,000.00Annual Report to State Controller 3,100.00$ $3,050.00$800.00Subtotal$64,650.00 $68,050.00 $60,050.00Total$64,650.00 $68,050.00 $60,050.00Baseline$64,250.00Page 693 of 1234

Staff Report

TO: City Council
FROM: Thaxton Van Belle, General Manager of Utilities
DATE March 7, 2023
SUBJECT: Ratification of Emergency Repair Costs for Membrane Bioreactor (MBR) Pump – Capital Improvement Project No. 2017-005

Description Ratify emergency pump repairs in the amount of $36,890.52.

Background and Analysis:

During the Wastewater Treatment Plant Expansion and Salt Mitigation Project, the MBR process was upgraded and expanded as part of Change Order No.23, approved on December 21, 2021. This enhancement took the number of running process trains from four (4) to six (6). During the ensuing construction and installation, it was discovered that some of the existing Vogelsang Rotary Lobe Pumps needed repairs before the work could be completed. An emergency authorization was given to proceed with repairs so as to not impact the completion of the project.

Fiscal Impact:

The cost of the emergency repairs with tax and freight is $36,890.52 with funding from Capital Improvement Project (CIP) No. 2017-005.

Project Accounting:

Page 694 of 1234 ends

Recommended Action:

Ratify the cost of emergency repairs in the amount of $36,890.52 payable to DXP Enterprises, Inc.

Attachments:

A. Repair Quote
B. Final Invoice

Page 695 of 1234 ends

Page 696 of 1234 ends

02/01/23

INVOICE
12789936
Invoice Date Page

INVOICE
53447940
ORDER NUMBERPO Box 840511
DXP Enterprises, Inc.

Dallas, TX 75284-0511
1 of 2
New Remit
To Address:

Bill To:Ship To:

US
Beaumont, CA 92223-2674
715 W Fourth St

CITY OF BEAUMONTCITY OF BEAUMONT
550 E Sixth St
Beaumont, CA 92223-2253
US
Customer ID:509427
Net Due Date Discount AmountDisc Due DateTerm DescriptionPO Number KEVIN LEE 11/3/22 Net 30 03/03/23 03/03/23 0.00
Primary Salesrep NameOrder Date Pick Ticket No Taker
11/03/22 14941015 Devon Greer TIM.PORRITT
Item ID
Item DescriptionOrderedShippedRemaining
Quantities
UOM
Disp.Unit Size
Pricing
UOM Unit
Price
Unit Size
Price
Extended
Tracking #:Carrier:

1.000 0.000 EA SERVICE REPAIR KIT EA 9,970.0000 9,970.00

1.0 1.0000

0.000

SERVICE REPAIR KIT
**********Service Item**********
Serial Number:LABOR RO 2420

LABOR TO REPAIR VOGELSANG PUMP

1.000 0.000 EA SERVICE REPAIR KIT EA 24,593.0000 24,593.00

1.0 1.0000

0.000

SERVICE REPAIR KIT
**********Service Item**********
Serial Number:PARTS RO 2420

PARTS TO REPAIR VOGELSANG PUMP
SERIAL#A23427

1.000 0.000 EA SERVICE FREIGHT KIT EA 409.9000 409.90

1.0 1.0000

0.000

FREIGHT
**********Service Item**********
Serial Number:FRIEGHT RO 2420

FREIGHT FOR PARTS TO COME IN AND
SHIP PUMP TO CUSOTMER.

ORIGINAL
Pioneering Solutions in Industrial Distribution Since 1908 ALL SALES SUBJECT TO TERMS AND CONDITIONS AT WWW.DXPE.COM/TERMS.HTMLPage 697 of 1234

02/01/23

INVOICE
12789936
Invoice Date Page

INVOICE
53447940
ORDER NUMBERPO Box 840511
DXP Enterprises, Inc.

Dallas, TX 75284-0511
2 of 2
New Remit
To Address:

Item ID
Item DescriptionOrdered Shipped Remaining
Quantities
UOM
Disp.Unit Size
Pricing
UOM Unit
Price
Unit Size
Price
Extended
SUB-TOTAL:Total Lines:3 34,972.90
Total tax for invoice 1,917.62:
36,890.52AMOUNT DUE:

USD

ORIGINAL
Pioneering Solutions in Industrial Distribution Since 1908 ALL SALES SUBJECT TO TERMS AND CONDITIONS AT WWW.DXPE.COM/TERMS.HTML REQ 2133

Page 698 of 1234 ends

Staff Report

TO: City Council
FROM: Nicole Wheelwright, Deputy City Clerk
DATE March 7, 2023
SUBJECT: Update to the Economic Development Committee Policy and Procedures

Description Determination of authorized power of appointment to a voting seat on the Economic Development Committee.

Background and Analysis:

At the City Council meeting of December 20, 2022, two applicants were appointed as Alternate Members to the Economic Development Committee. At the City Council meeting of February 7, 2023, an updated policy and procedures was adopted and as a result, two of the vacant seats on the committee are no longer categorized as business owner members. This in turn makes the seats eligible for the alternates to be appointed to. In accordance with Government Code Section 54974, the vacancies have also been advertised on the City’s website. As of March 2, 2023, no applications have been received.

The topic of appointment of alternate members to the vacant seats was discussed during the Economic Development Committee meeting of February 8, 2023, and it was requested that the determination of appointment power be researched.

Currently, there is no provision within the Policy and Procedure that speaks to this and it was recommended that it come before the City Council for review and determination.

The City Council determined that the Economic Development Committee shall have authority to appoint Alternate Members to vacant seats on the committee as they arise.

Secondly, during the City Council’s appointment process to the committee, should they choose alternate members f or the committee, they will be numbered Alternate Member No. 1, 2, etc., for order of eligibility when the committee makes any appointments to any vacant seats.

These changes have been made to the attached policy for review and adoption.

Page 699 of 1234 ends

Fiscal Impact:

The cost of this staff report is estimated to be $50.

Recommended Action:

Review and adopt the updated Economic Development Committee Policy and Procedure.

Attachments:

A. EDC Policies and Procedures – updated March 2, 2023

Page 700 of 1234 ends

Economic Development Committee
Policies and Procedures

Section 1. Creation of Committee. The City Council on March 15th, 2016 created an Economic Development Committee. The Committee shall consist of fifteen (15) members. The Student committee position shall be a non-voting member and shall be selected from members of the Beaumont Youth Council.

Section 2. Appointment and Qualifications of Committee Members. The City Council shall appoint the members of the Committee. Committee members shall be at least sixteen (16) years of age and shall consist of two (2) members of the City Council, the City Manager, an Economic Development staff member of the City as assigned by the City Manager, a Beaumont Chamber of Commerce Representative, a local developer/economic development representative, three (3) members preferably from the business community, a BUSD representative, a post- secondary education representative, two (2) community members, a Beaumont Youth Council member and a Rotating Member position for an industry expert. At the discretion of the City Council, Alternate Members may be selected and appointed as non -voting members.

There will be fourteen (14) voting members. Each member shall be allowed to send an alternate from their represented organization to fill in. The alternate will count toward the meeting quorum, but will not be considered a voting member.

Section 3. Excused/Unexcused Absences. Members who serve on the committee shall plan on attending all meetings. From time-to-time members may become ill or have an emergency that conflicts with the meeting day and time. If the member informs City Staff or the Chairperson of their absence for a related reason prior to the meeting start, the absence will be considered excused. All committee members will be allowed two (2) unexcused absences within a calendar year. In the event a committee member is absent, and an alternate attends o n behalf of that member, the absence will not be considered unexcused. Any Committee member may be asked to resign or removed from the Committee after two unexcused absences.

Section 4. Vacancies. In the event of a vacant seat on the committee, the committee members shall have the authority to appoint a Council-appointed Alternate Member to an applicable vacant seat on the committee.

Page 701 of 1234 ends

Section 5. Term and Tenure of Members. All members of the Committee shall be appointed for a term of two (2) years and shall serve at the pleasure of the City Council. Members shall serve without compensation. City Council may elect for the terms to be staggered.

Section 5. Powers and Duties. The Committee shall be advisory to the City Council. The Committee shall hold public meetings monthly at a date and time agreeable to members of the committee. In the event there is no Committee business to conduct, the meeting may be canceled. The Committee shall not utilize and/or expend City Staff or consultants time, without the prior approval and authorization by the City Council.

Section 6. Rules and Regulations. The Committee shall appoint a chair, who shall conduct Committee meetings and report quarterly to the City Council on Committee activities and recommendations. The Committee shall adopt such rules and regulations as are needed to conduct its meetings and shall comply with the Brown Act and other applicable laws.

Page 702 of 1234 ends

Staff Report

TO: City Council
FROM: Elizabeth Gibbs, City Manager
DATE March 7, 2023
SUBJECT: Second Reading to Adopt Ordinance Amending Procurement of Professional Services

Description Adoption of an ordinance amending Beaumont Municipal Code Chapter

3.02. – Procurement of Professional Services.

Background and Analysis:

At the City Council meeting of January 17, 2023, City Council directed staff to modify Beaumont Municipal Code (BMC) Chapter 3.02 – Procurement of Professional Services, making the following modifications:

(1) Section 3.02.050 Exemptions to Competitive Procurement Procedures – exempting legal services.
(2) Section 3.02.060 Award of Contract – increasing City Council required approval to $75,000.
(3) Section 3.02.070 Term of Professional Services – increasing contract award from five years to five years with two one-year renewals, subject to City Council approval.
(4) Section 3.02.090 Contracts under Seventy-Five Thousand Dollars – increasing professional services contracts without competitive bidding process from $25,000 to $75,000.

On February 21, 2023, City Council held a public hearing and waived the first full reading and adopted by title only the proposed ordinance.

Fiscal Impact:

The cost to prepare this staff report is approximately $350.

Page 703 of 1234 ends

Recommended Action:

Waive the second full reading and adopt by title only. “An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Beaumont, California, Amending Chapter 3.02 to the City of Beaumont Municipal Code.”
Attachments:

A. Ordinance

Page 704 of 1234 ends

ORDINANCE NO.

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY

OF BEAUMONT, CALIFORNIA AMENDING CHAPTER

3.02 CONCERNING PROCUREMENT OF PROFESSIONAL

SERVICES OF THE CITY OF BEAUMONT MUNICIPAL
CODE

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BEAUMONT DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. CEQA. The City Council finds that the actions contemplated by this Ordinance are exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to Section 15060 (c)(2) (the activity will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment) and 15060(c)(3) (the activity is not a project as defined in Section 15378) of the CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, because it has no potential for resulting in physical change to the environment, directly or indirectly.

SECTION 2. Severability. The City Council hereby declares that if any provision, section, paragraph, sentence, or word of this Ordinance is rendered or declared to be invalid or unconstitutional by any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction, or by reason of any preemptive legislation, such invalidity shall not affect the other provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences or words of this Ordinance, and to this end the provisions of this Ordinance are severable.

The City Council declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance irrespective of the invalidity of any particular portion thereof and intends that the invalid portions should be severed and the balance of the Ordinance enforced.

SECTION 3. Chapter 3.01 are hereby amended and restated in full to read as attached hereto as Exhibit “A”.

SECTION 4. Effective Date and Publication. The Mayor shall sign and the City Clerk shall certify to the passage of this Ordinance and cause the same or a summary thereof to be published within 15 days after adoption in accordance with Government Code Section 36933. This Ordinance shall take effect 30 days after adoption in accordance with Government Code Section 36937.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED that the City Council of the City of Beaumont, California, approves this amendment to the City Code.

Page 705 of 1234 ends

INTRODUCED AND READ for the first time and ordered posted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Beaumont, California, held on the _____ day of _________ 2023, by the following roll call vote:

AYES:

NOES
ABSENT:

ABSTAIN

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Beaumont, California, held on the _____ day of __________ 2023, by the following roll call vote:

AYES:

NOES
ABSENT:

ABSTAIN

_______________________
Julio Martinez III, Mayor

Attest:

_______________________
Elaine Morgan, City Clerk

Page 706 of 1234 ends

Chapter 3.02.000 - Procurement of Professional Services Sections:

3.02.010 Purpose and Policy.

3.02.020 Purchasing Officer-Office Created.

3.02.030 Purchasing Officer-Duties.

3.02.040 Competitive Procurement Procedures.

3.02.050 Exemptions to Competitive Procurement Procedures.

3.02.060 Award of Contract.

3.02.070 Term of Professional Services.

3.02.080 City Council Discretion.

3.02.090 Contracts Under TwentySeventy- Five Thousand Dollars ($725,000).

3.02.010 Purpose and Policy. It shall be the policy of the City that the procurement of professional services, including engineering, architectural, landscape architectural, environmental, land surveying, or construction project management services shall be on the basis of demonstrated competence and on the professional qualifications necessary for the satisfactory performance of the services required, and on the fairness and reasonableness of the costs of services to the City, but shall not be awarded solely on the basis of cost.

3.02.020 Purchasing Officer-Office Created. There is created the position of Purchasing Officer. The duties of the Purchasing Officer shall be administered by the City Manager or such person as he or she may designate.

3.02.030 Purchasing Officer-Duties. The duties of the Purchasing Officer shall be:

A. The promulgation of administrative regulations and the adoption of such other rules and regulations as may be prescribed by the City Manager and approved by the City Council. Such regulations shall specifically prohibit practices which might result in unlawful activity including, but not limited to, rebates, kickbacks, or other unlawful consideration, and shall specifically prohibit City employees from participating in the selection process when those employees have a relationship with a person or business entity seeking a contract under this Section which would subject those employees to the prohibitions of the conflict of interest laws.

B. The negotiation and recommendation of execution of contracts for professional services.

3.02.040 Competitive Procurement Procedures. The Purchasing Officer shall comply with the following procedure for the procurement of professional services:

A. Request for Proposal: Prepare a request for proposal outlining services desired. The request for proposal shall identify all significant evaluation factors, including price or costs when required, and their relative importance.

Page 707 of 1234 ends

B. Solicitation of Proposal: The request for proposals shall be publicized and disclosed publically on the City website. Any properly qualified firm or professional shall be permitted to timely submit a responsive proposal for consideration.

C. Evaluation: The Purchasing Officer shall develop mechanisms for the technical evaluation of proposals received, and shall conduct discussions with the proposers regarding anticipated concepts and the relative utility of alternative methods of approach for furnishing the required services.

D. Compilation: The Purchasing Officer shall compile the proposals for consideration by the City Council.

3.02.050 Exemptions to Competitive Procurement Procedure. Upon obtaining approval from the City Council, the Purchasing Officer may engage services of a professional firm or individual without complying with the Competitive Procurement Procedures in the following circumstances:

A. Legal services

B. The services are available only from a single source; or

C. Public exigency or emergency will not permit delay; or

D. State or federal grant or loan requirements authorize noncompetitive procurement of such services; or

E. After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is deemed inadequate.

In circumstances of public exigency or emergency where prior approval of the City Council cannot be reasonably obtained, the City Manager may engage services of a professional firm or individual. The professional services contract shall be submitted to the City Council at the next regularly scheduled City Council meeting.

3.02.060 Award of Contract. City Council approval is required for all contracts for professional services when the cost of the services is twentyseventy- five thousand dollars ($725,000) or more. The contract shall clearly state the names of the professionals that will provide services under the contract, along with their hourly rate. The contract shall also state a “not to exceed” sum. The professional shall not exceed the “not to exceed” sum without the City Council’s prior approval. Contracts awarded to any firm shall not exceed an aggregate amount of seventytwenty- five thousand ($725,000) in a fiscal year without approval by the City Council.

Page 708 of 1234 ends

3.02.070 Term of Professional Services. Except in the case of procurement of legal services, the term of any professional services contract awarded shall be a maximum of five (5) years, with two (2) one-year renewals, subject to City Council approval. In the case of legal services, City Council may at any time exercise their right to termination of legal services contracts with a simple majority vote of the City Council. Contracts shall be submitted to the City Council annually for approval, renewal, termination, non-renewal or extension. Extension of a contract beyond the initial term shall be approved by four fifth (4/5) vote of the City Council.

Professional services contracts shall not contain “evergreen” type clauses that allow for automatic renewal without City Council approval.

3.02.080. City Council Discretion. The award of a contract for professional services shall be within the City Council’s discretion. The City Council may, in its discretion, modify or extend a request for proposal for professional services. The City Council reserves the right to reject any and all proposals.

3.02.090 Contracts Under Seventy-Twenty Five Thousand Dollars ($725,000). Professional services contracts under seventy-twenty five thousand dollars ($725,000) may be awarded by the Purchasing Officer without a formal bidding procedure. Professional services contracts shall not be divided into smaller contracts or subcontracts to avoid the competitive procedures set forth in section 3.01.040 and 3.01.060.

Page 709 of 1234 ends

Staff Report

TO: City Council
FROM: Jennifer Ustation, Finance Director
DATE March 7, 2023
SUBJECT: Public Hearing and Consideration of Resolution Adopting an Updated User Fee Schedule

Description Specific service fees to be updated based on comprehensive user fee study. The adoption of this Resolution is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA,” Public Resources Code Sections 21000 et seq.), because it approves and sets forth a procedure for determining fees for the purpose of meeting the operating expenses of City departments, as set forth in Public Resources Code Section 21080(b)(8)(A) and Section 15273 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines.

Background and Analysis:

On September 20, 2022, staff brought forth a cost of services study for direction on a proposed new fee schedule. Staff used recommendations from City Council to work with Revenue and Cost Specialists (RCS) to complete the proposed new fee schedule changes. The study accounts for all revenue but focuses on the relationship between fees and taxes. RCS then determined what total service costs for each fee are and whether the revenue received supports the total cost or if the service is subsidized by taxes.

RCS suggests that services that are Personal Choice as opposed to Community Supported Services should be paid for by the service requestor rather than subsidized by the entire community, however, the City Council has final decision on the nature of the service and whether it deserves to be subsidized.

On December 20, 2022, City Council was presented options for possible fees relating to the Community Services Department including sports field fees and facility rental fees.

The discussion on that night included edits to the proposed Sports Field Policy Handbook, revisions to the proposed fee schedule, and the residency requirements for discounted fees that would apply to Youth Non-Profit Organizations. The goals of the discussion with City Council were to present proposed fees in a way that would allow for

Page 710 of 1234 ends

some cost recovery, but also consider the impact it may have on non-profit organizations and the services they provide the community.

On January 17, 2023, the City Council discussed with staff proposed recreation fees.

New fees have been suggested to offset public expenses to operate, maintain, supervise, and administer the use of park and athletic facilities. At this meeting, the City Council approved the Sports Field Policy Handbook which will assist the Community Services Department with the direction of applying fees to the sports fields.

On February 7, 2023, the City Council reviewed the proposed fee changes (not including recreation fees), that have been recommended from the cost of services study. At that meeting, the City Council recommended to change the Minor Special Event Permit from the recommended $1,288 per application to a staff recommended reduced amount. Staff is recommending making the Minor Special Event Permit to a deposit-based fee of $500.

Included in this report is the recommended changes for all fees. Any fees that had not been reviewed prior were posted to the City’s website for review at least 10 days prior to this meeting which includes suggested new fire fees and recreation fees.

Public Notice Requirement

The user fees include both development and non -development fees. A public hearing is required for fee revisions. A public hearing notice was published in accordance with California Government Code section 6062a for a hearing at this March 7, 2023, regularly scheduled City Council meeting to adopt a resolution that confirms and updates the user fees and changes. The notice was published in the Press-Enterprise on February 25, 2023.

Effective Date and Future Fee Updates

Staff is recommending an effective date of July 1, 2023. It is a recommended best practice that a comprehensive review of cost of services and fees be performed every three to five years. Annual fee adjustments will be made utilizing the current CPI factor.

Fiscal Impact:

Approving the updated recommended user fees and charges will allow the City to improve its ability to seek full cost recovery for most City services. Actual cost recovery is dependent upon actual activity for those services.

Page 711 of 1234 ends

Overall revenue increases are difficult to estimate, due to the change in activity levels from year to year. RCS has provided a possible new revenue amount with these changes of $702,300.

Recommended Action:

Hold a Public Hearing, and
Waive the full reading and adopt by title only, “A Resolution of the City Council of Beaumont Adopting a Comprehensive User Fee Study and Adopting a Comprehensive Fee Schedule Establishing User Fees for Certain Specified Services.” Attachments:

A. Resolution Adopting Fee Study and Fee Schedule
B. Exhibit A of Resolution
C. Exhibit B of Resolution
D. Cost of Services Study for the City of Beaumont
E. Public Notice

Page 712 of 1234 ends

RESOLUTION NO.

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

BEAUMONT ADOPTING A COMPREHENSIVE USER FEE

STUDY AND ADOPTING A COMPREHENSIVE FEE

SCHEDULE ESTABLISHING USER FEES FOR CERTAIN

SPECIFIED SERVICES

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BEAUMONT DOES HEREBY
RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. The City Council of the City of Beaumont (“City Council”) hereby finds, determines and declares that:

A. The City Council has conducted an extensive analysis of its services, the costs reasonably borne by the City in provided those services, the beneficiaries of those services, and the revenues produced by those paying fees and charges for special services;
B. The City Council has determined that City staff provides many types of services ("Services") involving requests by City customers ("Applicants"); and C. The City currently imposes user fees ("User Fees") upon Applicants to recover the costs of staff time, copying costs, and other expenses related to providing these Services; and
D. Current User Fees charged for the City's Services do not adequately recoup the City's costs of providing certain Services and thus, a significant amount of these costs are currently paid out of the City's general fund and, therefore, borne by the general public; and
E. The City Council finds that providing these Services are of special benefit to Applicants both separate and apart from the general benefit to the public, and therefore, in the interests of fairness to the general public, the City desires to better recover the costs of providing these Services from Applicants who have sought the City's Services by revising its schedule of User Fees; and F. The proposed User Fees are initially based upon the information contained in a document by City staff and Consultant ("Consultant") entitled "Cost of Services Study for the City of Beaumont " ("Fee Study"), dated September 2022, and updated by staff to reflect current costs of the City to provide the Services; and

Page 713 of 1234 ends

G. Pursuant to state law, the City may impose User Fees for certain services.

H. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66014, the City is empowered to impose User Fees covering up to 100 percent of the actual costs of providing Services to Applicants; and
I. The City desires to adjust certain fees to recoup part or all of the actual costs incurred by the City in providing these Services; and
J. Chapter 3.32 of the Beaumont Municipal Code provides that the City may set fees to recoup costs reasonably borne by the City by means of adopting a resolution of the City Council, after compliance with the requirements of state law; and K. Government Code Section 66014 et al. allows local agencies to charge fees for various activities as long as those fees do not exceed the estimated reasonable costs of provided the service for which the fee is intended; and L. Pursuant to Government Code Sections 66014, 66015,66017 and 66018 and the Beaumont Municipal Code, the specific fees to be charged for certain regulations, services and products must be adopted by resolution or ordinance, following notice and public hearing; and
M. written notice has been provided to interested parties who filed written requests for mailed notice of meetings on new or increased development-related fees or service charges as required by Section 66016(a); and
N. The City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing on March 7, 2022, at which time the public was invited to make oral and written presentations as part of the regularly scheduled meeting prior to the adoption of this Resolution; and O. At least ten (10) days prior to the public hearing referenced above, the City made available for public inspection the Fee Study as required under Government Code Section 66016; and
P. The City published notice of the public hearing as described above in accordance with Government Code Sections 66018 and 6062a (10 days in a newspaper regularly published once a week or oftener. Two publications, with at least five days intervening between the dates of first and last publication not counting such publication dates, are sufficient); and
Q. The establishment and increase of User Fees is statutorily and categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act because setting User Fees and Development Fees fits within the statutory exemptions for local agency decisions involving rates, tolls or other charges pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21080(b)(8) and Section 15273 of the California

Page 714 of 1234 ends

Environmental Quality Act Guidelines this Resolution is not "an essential step culminating in action which may affect the environment”.

Section 2. Adoption of the Report and Methodology. The City Council hereby approves “Cost of Services Study for the City of Beaumont”, dated September 2022, and updated by staff to reflect current costs of the City to provide the Services and adopts the methodology for calculating and collecting the fees and charges established therein.

Section 3. Adoption of Fees and Charges. The City Council hereby adopts the "City of Beaumont User Fee Schedule" as set forth in attached Exhibit "A" and incorporated by this reference. Unless otherwise stated in the Fee Schedule, all User Fees shall be paid to the City by the Applicant prior to the City's performance of the requested Services.

Section 4. Repeal of Conflicting Resolutions. It is the desire of the City Council that all fees and charges for services, programs or products be set forth in one document for ease of reference. Accordingly, any and all provisions of prior Resolutions of the City Council establishing or modifying fees for the services, programs or products set forth in Exhibit “A,” are hereby repealed and replaced as of the effective date of this Resolution in the manner set forth in Exhibit “A;” provided, however, that such repeal shall not excuse or affect the failure of any person or entity to pay any fee heretofore imposed upon such person or entity. The City Council desires to clarify that in adopting this Resolution, it is taking action only on those fees for the services, progr ams or products set forth in Exhibit A which have been modified from prior resolutions of the City Council. The remaining fees that have not been modified from prior resolutions shall remain in full force and effect and are hereby restated in Exhibit “B” for convenience so that all fees are set forth in one document.

Section 5. Building Valuation Based Fees. Building valuation to determine building fees based on project valuation shall be determined by using the current International Code Council (ICC) Building Valuation Data published preceding the fee update. The current publication in effect is August 2022 published 09/20/2022. When the Building Valuation Data publication does not define the project, the valuation of the work shall be determined as described in the currently adopted California Code of Regulations Title 24.

Section 6. Deposit Based Fees. The City Council herby authorizes the stop work of applications which fall below ten percent (20%) balance on all deposit-based applications.

The application is automatically deemed incomplete due to lack of funds and additional fess shall be deposited, as requested by staff, with the City of Beaumont for estimated completion of the application.

Section 7. Environmental Exemption. The adoption of this Resolution is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA,” Public Resources Code Sections 21000 et seq.), because it approves and sets forth a procedure for determining fees for the purpose of meeting the operating expenses of City departments, as set forth in Public

Page 715 of 1234 ends

Resources Code Section 21080(b)(8)(A) and Section 15273 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines.

Section 8. Severability. If any section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this Resolution or any part hereof is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portio n of this Resolution or any part thereof. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed each section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase hereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more section, subsection, sub division, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase be declared invalid or unconstitutional.

Section 9. Effective Date. This Resolution and all fees and rates herein shall continue and/or take effect on July 1, 2023.

ADOPTED this 7th day of March 2023.

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

By: __________ Julio Martinez, Mayor, City of Beaumont

ATTEST:

Nicole Wheelwright
Deputy City Clerk

By: _____________

Page 716 of 1234 ends

EXHIBIT "A"
Establishing or Modified Fees
[Attached]

Page 717 of 1234 ends

EXHIBIT "B"
All Other Fees Not Modified
[Attached]

Page 718 of 1234 ends

REF # FEE TITLE FEE AMOUNT
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
S-001 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT $5,000 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs
S-002 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT $2,715 per application S-003 FINDINGS OF PUBLIC CONV/NECESSITY $2,005 per application S-004 CUP TIME EXTENSION $1,970 per application
S-005 LARGE GROUP HOME CUP $3,730 per application
S-006 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT Up to 50 acres - $5,000 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs
Over 50 acres - $7,500 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus
any outside costs
S-007 ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT CHANGE $5,000 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs
S-008 SPECIFIC PLAN $15,000 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs
S-009 SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT $7,500 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs
S-010 SPEC PLAN CONFORMITY DETERMINATION $5,000 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs
S-011 ANNEXATION $25,000 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside or LAFCo costs
S-012 PLAN OF SERVICES $5,000 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs
S-013 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT $25,000 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs
S-014 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT ANNUAL REVIEW $2,165 per review S-015 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AMENDMENT $10,000 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs
S-016 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT ASSIGNMENT $5,000 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs
S-017 ESTOPPEL CERTIFICATE $5,000 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs
S-018 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Actual consultant cost plus 20% Administrative fee Filing Fees - Actual costs
S-019 FACILITY FEE CREDIT AGREEMENT $10,000 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs
S-020 DENSITY BONUS AGREEMENT $5,000 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs
S-021 PRE-APPLICATION MEETING $2,210 per meeting/review 50% credit on the first meeting's fee if the project is submitted within six months
S-022 ZONING MAP CHANGE $5,000 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs
S-023 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP $5,000 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs
S-024 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP $7,500 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs

Page 719 of 1234 ends

REF # FEE TITLE FEE AMOUNT
S-025 TENTATIVE MAP TIME EXTENSION $2,190 per application S-026 CONDOMINIUM CONVERSION $10,000 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs
S-027 VARIANCE $2,560 per application
S-028 MINOR VARIANCE/MODIF OF STANDARDS $245 per application S-029 PLOT PLAN $5,000 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs
S-030 PLOT PLAN AMENDMENT $3,000 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs
S-031 PLOT PLAN TIME EXTENSION $2,005 per application
S-032 RESIDENTIAL ADMIN PLOT PLAN $925 per application
S-033 NON-RESIDENTIAL ADMIN PLOT PLAN $1,030 per application S-034 MINOR PLOT PLAN - STAFF $1,435 per application
S-035 MINOR PLOT PLAN - PLAN COMM $3,230 per application S-036 PICK A LOT SITE PLAN REVIEW $315 per lot
S-037 MAP/PLOT PLAN CONFORMITY DETERMIN. $2,500 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs
S-038 LANDSCAPE PLAN REVIEW $20 per application plus $140 per sheet S-039 LANDSCAPE PLAN AMENDMENT $20 per application plus $140 per sheet Cost is based on six sheets
S-040 LANDSCAPE INSPECTION (PLANNING)$205 per lot
S-041 SIGN PROGRAM $1,870 per application
S-042 SIGN PROGRAM AMENDMENT $1,870 per application
S-043 SIGN PERMIT $375 per application
S-044 SIGN PERMIT PANEL CHANGE $170 per application
S-045 TEMPORARY SIGN PERMIT $170 per application
S-046 UNLICENSED GROUP HOME PERMIT $3,335 per application S-047 AUTOMOBILE FOR HIRE REVIEW $2,720 per application S-048 HOME OCCUPATION PERMIT $225 per application
S-049 MINOR SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT $500 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all staff involved plus any outside costs.

S-050 MAJOR SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT $1,985 per application Carnival/Circus/Menagerie - additional $455 per
application
Events of more than 1,000 people - $5,000 deposit with
charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all staff involved plus any outside costs
S-051 MISCELLANEOUS SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT $1,000 per application S-052 APPEAL TO PLANNING COMISSION $2,585 per appeal
S-053 APPEAL TO CITY COUNCIL $2,985 per appeal
S-054 PLANNING INFORMATION REQUEST $225 per letter, plus a deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all
personnel involved for additional research
S-055 MISCELLANEOUS PLANNING REVIEW Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus
any outside costs
S-056 COM DEV TECHNOLOGY SURCHARGE 3.29% Of Building, Planning, and Engineering fees S-057 BUILDING PLAN CHECK/INSPECTION See Appendix C below for detail S-058 FINAL PARCEL MAP $5,000 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs
S-059 FINAL TRACT MAP $7,500 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs
S-060 TENTATIVE REVERSION TO ACREAGE This fee should be removed as the service is no longer provided
S-061 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT/PARCEL MERGER $1,200 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs

Page 720 of 1234 ends

REF # FEE TITLE FEE AMOUNT
S-062 FINAL MONUMENT SETTING This fee should be removed from the fee schedule as the service is no longer provided
S-063 FINAL MONUMENT INSPECTION $1,500 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs
S-064 PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN CHECK $565 per plan
S-065 RESIDENTIAL GRADING PLAN CHECK $95 per plan plus $750 per sheet $95 per plan plus $750 per sheet
$95 per plan plus $750 per sheet
$95 per plan plus $750 per sheet
S-066 RES GRADING PLAN CHECK AMENDMENT $3,000 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs
S-067 RES GRADING PLAN CHECK ADD'L REVIEW $1,000 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs
S-068 COMMERCIAL GRADING PLAN CHECK $95 per plan plus $1,125 per sheet S-069 COMMERCIAL GRADING PLAN AMENDMENT $3,000 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs
S-070 COMM GRADING PLAN CHECK ADD'L REV $1,000 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs
S-071 GRADING/STOCKPILE INSPECTION Charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs
Charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all
personnel involved plus any outside costs
Charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all
personnel involved plus any outside costs
Charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all
personnel involved plus any outside costs
S-072 GRADING/STOCKPILE RES. INFILL INSP $435 per permit S-073 STREET LIGHT PLAN REVIEW $95 per plan plus $655 per sheet S-074 IMPROVEMENT CONSTRUCTION PLAN CHECK $95 per plan plus $1,030 per sheet S-075 IMPROVEMENT CONSTRUCTION PLAN AMEND $1,500 deposit with charges at contract cost plus 20% for administration
S-076 IMPROVEMENT CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION Deposit based on the Engineers Estimate (Minimum $750)
Deposit based on the Engineers Estimate
(Minimum $750)
S-077 SUBDIVISION/IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT $725 per agreement plus actual costs for legal S-078 PERFORMANCE BOND RELEASE $915 per application
S-079 BOND RELEASE INSPECTION $3,000 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs
S-080 MAINTENANCE BOND RELEASE $915 per application
S-081 MAINTENANCE BOND INSPECTION $3,000 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs
S-082 SUSPENSION OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT This fee should be removed as the service is no longer provided
S-083 APPEAL SUSPENSION OF IMPROVEMENT This fee should be removed as the service is no longer provided
S-084 STREET VACATION/OFFER OF DEDICATION $2,000 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs
S-085 NON-STANDARD ENCROACH PERMIT APPL $60 per application S-086 EXIST RESID STANDARD ENCROACH PRMT $280 per permit S-087 NON-STANDARD ENCROACH PLAN CHECK $40 per plan plus charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs S-088 NON-STANDARD ENCROACH INSPECTION Deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs

Page 721 of 1234 ends

REF # FEE TITLE FEE AMOUNT
S-089 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE/CORRECT. $1,000 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs
S-090 PUBLIC WORKS PERMIT ISSUANCE Within One Year - $95 After One Year - $1,000 deposit with charges at the
fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs
S-091 WATER QUALITY MGMT PRELIM PLAN CHK 0-10 acres - $2,345 per plan Above 10 acres - $3,465 per plan
S-092 WATER QUALITY MGMT FINAL PLAN CHECK Above 10 acres - $2,420 per plan 0-10 acres - $1,855 per plan
S-093 PRELIM HYDROLOGY/HYDRAULIC STUDY 0-10 acres - $2,345 per study 10-50 acres - $3.095 per study
50-100 acres - $3,840 per study
100+ acres - $4,590 per study
S-094 FINAL HYDROLOGY/HYDRAULIC STUDY 0-10 acres - $2,345 per study 10-50 acres - $3,095 per study
50-100 acres - $3,840 per study
100+ acres - $4,590 per study
S-095 STORMWATER POLLUTION PROTECT REVIEW This fee should be removed from the fee schedule as the service is provided by the State
S-096 STORMWATER POST-CONSTRUCT INSPECT Charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs
S-097 SEWER CONNECTION/LATERAL INSPECTION This fee should be removed as the service cost is already covered as part an encroachment permit
S-098 LANDSCAPE PLAN CHECK $95 per plan plus $560 per sheet S-099 LANDSCAPE INSPECTION (PW) Deposit of 50% of Engineers Estimate ($500 minimum)
S-100 TRAFFIC STUDY REVIEW $2,000 deposit with charges at contract cost plus 20% for administration
S-101 SCOPING AGREEMENT $750 deposit with charges at contract cost plus 20% for administration
S-102 TRANSPORTATION WIDE LOAD PERMIT Fees are set by the State: Single - $16 per permit Fees are set by the State: Annual - $90 per permit
S-103 HAUL ROUTE REVIEW $245 per application
S-104 DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING DEPOSIT SVC These fees are detailed in the various services with a deposit-based fee
S-105 ENGINEERING EXTRA PLAN CHECK Charges at contract cost plus 20% for administration S-106 MISCELLANEOUS ENGINEERING SERVICES Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus
any outside costs plus 20% for administration
PUBLIC SAFETY SERVICES
S-107 CODE ENFORCEMENT INSPECTION $120 per hour
S-108 INSPECTION WARRANT Charge the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs
S-109 ABATEMENT WARRANT Charge the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs
S-110 CODE ENFORCEMENT CITATION HEARING $500 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs S-111 ABANDONED PROP. INIT. REGISTRATION $185 per property S-112 ABANDONED PROPERTY MONTHLY INSPECT. $60 per month S-113 WEED ABATEMENT $245 plus actual cost of abatement S-114 WEED ABATEMENT SUBSCRIPTION PROGRAM $245 or 20% of abatement cost, whichever is less, plus actual cost of abatement
S-115 FIRE PLAN CHECK/INSPECTION See Appendix D for detail S-116 STORED VEHICLE RELEASE $175 per release
S-117 STORED VEHICLE RELEASE - DUI $290 per release
S-118 VIN VERIFICATION $60 per vehicle
S-119 TRAFFIC CITATION SIGN OFF $25 per citation
S-120 POLICE ALARM LICENSE $28 per license

Page 722 of 1234 ends

REF # FEE TITLE FEE AMOUNT
S-121 AUTO REPOSSESSION PROCESSING Fee is set by State law:
$15 per vehicle
S-122 SECOND HAND DEALER LICENSE $235 per application
S-123 FORTUNETELLER PERMIT $540 per application per year S-124 MASSAGE TECHNICIAN PERMIT - NEW $540 per application S-125 MASSAGE TECHNICIAN PERMIT - RENEWAL $45 per renewal S-126 MASSAGE ESTABLISHMENT PERMIT $225 per application, annually S-127 ADULT ORIENTED ESTABLISHMENT PERMIT $985 per application, annually S-128 TOBACCO RETAILER PERMIT $985 per application
S-129 GRAFFITI IMPLEMENTATION SALE PERMIT $140 per application S-130 TOW YARD INSPECTION $355 per inspection
S-131 PEDDLER SOLICITOR PERMIT $180 per person, annually S-132 BINGO PERMIT Remote Caller Game - $465 per permit Other - $50 per application (limited by State law)
S-133 RV PARKING PERMIT $7.50 per permit
S-134 GOLF CART PERMIT $175 per application, annually
S-135 CONCEALED WEAPON CARRY PERMIT Fee is set by State Law: New application - $100 Fee is set by State Law: $25 - renewal application
Fee is set by State Law:Psychological testing costs are to be added to the above fee up to $150
Fee is set by State Law: 20% of the fee is collected upon filing of the initial application and is and is non-
refundable. The balance of the fee is collected on
issuance of the license.

S-136 RECORDS CHECK/IMMIGRATION LETTER $25 per check
S-137 FINGERPRINTING Resident - $25
Non-Resident - $35
S-138 BICYCLE REGISTRATION Per State Vehicle Code, Section 39004: New - $4 Per State Vehicle Code, Section 39004: Transfer - $2
Per State Vehicle Code, Section 39004: Replacement -
$2
Per State Vehicle Code, Section 39004: Renewal - $2
S-139 CITATION PROCESSOR LATE FEE $35 per citation
S-140 POLICE REPORT COPY Black & White - $0.35 per copy Color - $0.45 per copy
S-141 POLICE ELECTRONIC FILE COPY $7 per device
S-142 ANIMAL RELINQUISHMENT Beaumont: Pick up - $135
Calimesa: Pick up - $135
Beaumont: Bring In - $115
Calimesa: Bring In - $115
Shelter Cost - $81
S-143 ANIMAL IMPOUND/RETURN TO OWNER Beaumont - $50
Calimesa - $80
S-144 DECEASED ANIMAL PICK UP Beaumont - $140
Calimesa - $140
S-145 ANIMAL QUARANTINE Beaumont - $175 per animal plus $50 per day Calimesa - $175 per animal plus $50 per day
S-146 DANGEROUS ANIMAL REGISTRATION $220 per animal
$220 per animal
S-147 ANIMAL TRAP RENTAL Beaumont - $60 per trap plus $10 per day after the fifth day, plus deposit based on replacement cost of
trap
Calimesa - $97 per trap plus $12 per day after the fifth day, plus deposit based on replacement cost of trap
S-148 DOG SILENCER RENTAL Beaumont - $60 plus deposit based on replacement cost of trap
Calimesa - $73 plus deposit based on replacement cost
of trap
S-149 KENNEL LICENSE Beaumont: 1 year - $300
Late Fee Penalty - 50% of License Fee
Beaumont: 2 year - $425
Late Fee Penalty - 50% of License Fee
Calimesa: 1 year - $300
Late Fee Penalty - 50% of License Fee

Page 723 of 1234 ends

REF # FEE TITLE FEE AMOUNT
S-150 SENTRY KENNEL LICENSE 1 year - $365
Late Fee Penalty - 50% of License Fee
2 year - $715
Late Fee Penalty - 50% of License Fee
S-151 MICROCHIP IDENTIFICATION DEVICE Beaumont - $35
Calimesa - $35
S-152 ANIMAL CONTROL RESPONSE Beaumont - $75
Calimesa - $94
S-153 ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES See Appendix E for below detail ENTERPRISE SERVICES
S-157 FATS, OILS OR GREASE INSPECTION General Facility - $205 per first inspection Dental Facility - $205 per first inspection plus $40 for Amalgam use
Reinspection - $95
S-158 INDUSTRIAL WASTE INSPECTION Charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs
S-159 WASTEWATER SURVEY $30 per review
S-160 SEWER FLOW MODELING Charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs
S-161 SEWAGE SPILL RESPONSE Charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
S-162 NEW BUSINESS LICENSE PROCESSING $80 per application $80 per application
S-163 BUSINESS LICENSE RENEWAL PROCESSING $40 per renewal $40 per renewal
S-164 RELEASE OF LIEN $50 per lien plus County fees
S-165 NON-UTILITY NSF CHECK/ACH PROCESS $35 per NSF check/ACH S-166 UTILITY BILLING ACH RETURN PROCESS $10 per ACH return S-167 CREDIT CARD PROCESSING 2% of the amount charged
S-168 DOCUMENT REPRODUCTION Black & White - $0.35 per copy Color - $0.45 per copy
Larger than 11 x 17 - Actual Costs
S-169 ELECTRONIC FILE REPRODUCTION $7 per device
$7 per device
$7 per device
$7 per device
$7 per device
S-170 PUBLIC NOTARY $15 per signature (fee is set by the State) APPENDIX C – BUILDING FEES FEE AMOUNT
Permit Processing
Residential Permit Processing $63
Commercial/Industrial Permit Processing $84
Minimum Permit Fee - Residential $155
Minimum Permit Fee - Commercial $307
Demolition
Patio Cover or Room $178
Swimming Pool or Building $268
Manufactured and Mobile Home Permits (ALL)Fixed Fee Set By State Inspections
Additional Inspection-Commercial $223
Additional Inspection-Residential $107
After Hours or Weekend Inspections (2 HR. Minimum)OT Hourly Rate Re-inspection Fee $128
Building Investigation Fee: In Field Double Permit Fees Plan Review
Plan Check 3rd and Subsequent Review - Outside Consultant Actual Cost Plan Check 3rd and Subsequent Review - In house $147
Expedited Plan Review 150% of Standard Plan Check Fee

Page 724 of 1234 ends

REF # FEE TITLE FEE AMOUNT
Accesibility Ramp $527
Accessory Structures‐Residential
Aluminum Patio Cover $208
Patio Cover - City Standard $312
Patio Cover - Non-Standard $438
Block Wall
Standard up to 6' Height <6' City Standard $178
Each Additional 100 LF over 50 LF $30
Non-Standard up to 6' Height <6' height $457
Each Additional 100 LF over 50 LF $47
Non-Standard <50' and Greater than 6' height $699
Each Additional 100 LF over 50 LF $47
Retaining Wall
Standard up to 6' Height <6' City Standard $478
Each Additional 100 LF over 50 LF $47
Non-Standard up to 6' Height <6' $699
Each Additional 100 LF over 50 LF $47
Non-Standard <50' and greater than 6' height $850
Each Additional 100 LF over 50 LF $48
Cellular Antenna/Pole
New $730
Modification $435
Commercial Hood & Duct $1,465
Construction Trailer $223
New Door/Window/Skylight - Residential $617
Drywall Repair - Up To 1,000 SF $312
Each Additional 1,000 SF $15
Flag Pole
Up To 25' $483
Over 25' $680
Food Truck or Carnival $223
Model Home Complex with Sales Office Conversion $1,247
Parking Lot Restriping - 1-2 Accessible Stalls $241
Each Additional Stall over 2 $24
Re‐Roof
Single Family Dwelling $164
Multi-Family/Commercial/Industrial - Up to 25,000 SQ or 250 Squares $268 Each Additional 25,000 SF or 250 Squares $44
Siding or Stucco Repair $510
Signs
Wall Sign $304
Monument Sign $604
Site Signage $831
Spray Booth $1,134
Storage Rack - First 500 LF $349
Each Additional 500 LF $40
Swimming Pool
Residential $630
Mult-Family/Commercial $1,984
Temporary Uses (e.g. Christmas Tree Lot/Pumpkin Lot/Similar Events)$438 Trash Enclosure $768
Wall Addition
Interior Residential $1,144
Interior Commercial $1,956
Window Changeout $241
New Construction Combo Trade Permit 10% of Building Permit Fee per Trade Plan Check Fee* 65% of the Permit Fee
Plan Check Revisions and/or Deferred submittals*City Cost + Admin 20% Miscellaneous Fees
Activity Reports $42
Addressing $122
Each Address $10
Appeal of Construction Board of Appeals or Accessibility Board of Appeals $2,585 Building Standards Fee Fixed Fee Set by State

Page 725 of 1234 ends

REF # FEE TITLE FEE AMOUNT
Change of Address $42
Change of Contractor-Permit Updates $42
Duplicate Inspection Card $21
Duplicate Certificate of Occupancy $103
Permit/Plan Review Extension $103
Property Permit History Search: Office or Field Actual Costs SMIP Fixed Fee Set by State
Street Names $122
Each street $19
Technology Surcharge 3.29%
Fees not specified. FBHR
Certificate of Occupancy $340
Services Not Listed Actual Costs
CONSTRUCTION FEES CALCULATED BY VALUE*:

VALLUATION
$0 to $1999 $321
$2000-$20,000 $321 plus $93 per $1,000 over $2k
$20,001-$50,000 $1,995 plus $18 per $1,000 over $20k
$50,001-$75,000 $2,535 plus $26 per $1,000 over $50k
$75,001-$100,000 $3,185 plus $32 per $1,000 over $75k
100,001 to 500,000 $3,985 plus $3 per $1,000 over $100k $500,001 to $1,000,000 $5,185 plus $3 per $1,000 over $500k $1,000,001 and up $6,685 plus $3 per $1,000 over $1M
Residential Homes, ADUs and Room Additions
Construction Fees Calculated by Sq. Ft.

Square Feet Rate Per Sq. Ft.
1-499 $772
500-999 $1,252 plus $61 per 100 SF over 500 SF
1000-2499 $1,557 plus $35 per 100 SF over 1,000 SF
2500 and over $2,082 plus $21 per 100 SF over 2,500 SF

ELECTRICAL
Electrical Permit Processing Fee - Residential $63
Minimum Electrical Permit Fee-Residential $156
Electrical Permit Processing Fee - Commercial $84
Minimum Electrical Permit Fee-Commercial $156
Processing fee simaltaneously with other MEP permit $21 Electrical Only Plan Review Fee 10% of Electrical Permit Fee ELECTRICAL FIXED FEES
Electrical Panel/Pedestal or Sub-Panel Max 200 amp $134 Electrical Meter Reset Permit $134
EV Charger Plug-Residential Plan Review $63
EV Charger Plug-Residential Permit $223
EV Charging Station - Commercial Plan Review $189
EV Charging Station each additional charger at same location $10 EV Charging Station - Commercial Permit $268
EV Charging Station each additional charger at same location $14 Generator 10 KW or less Plan Review $63
Generator 10 KW or less Permit $178
Generator over 10 KW Plan Review $95
Generator over 10 KW Permit $223
Solar
Residential Roof Mounted Solar Less Than 15 KW Plan Review $136 State Law Caps at $450 up to 15 kw (136+240 = $376)
Each additional 15 KW $7.50
State Law Caps at $15 FBHR is $16 (8+8 = $16)
Residential Roof Mounted Solar Less Than 15 KW Permit $240 State Law Caps at $450 up to 15 kw (136+240 = $376)
Each additional 15 KW $7.50
State Law Caps at $15 FBHR is $16 (8+8 = $16)

Page 726 of 1234 ends

REF # FEE TITLE FEE AMOUNT
Commercial Roof Mounted Solar Less than 50 KW Plan Review $222 State Law Caps at $1,000 up to 50kw (772+222 =
$994)
Commercial Roof Mounted Solar 51-250 KW Plan Review each KW $3.50 State Law Caps each KW from 51-250 to $7 Actual Fee
$16
Commercial Roof Mounted Solar 251+ KW Plan Review each KW $2.50 State Law Caps each KW over 250 to $5 Actual Fee $16
Commercial Roof Mounted Solar Less than 50 KW Permit $772 State Law Caps at $1,000 up to 50kw (772+222 =
$994)
Commercial Roof Mounted Solar 51-250 KW Permit each KW $3.50 State Law Caps each KW from 51-250 to $7 Actual Fee
$16
Commercial Roof Mounted Solar 251+ KW Permit each KW $2.50 State Law Caps each KW over 250 to $5 Actual Fee $16
Tract & Solar App - Residential Roof Mounted Solar Less Than 15 KW Permit
$240
State Law Caps at $450 up to 15 kw (136+240 = $376)
Each additional 15 KW $8
State Law Caps at $15
Residential Ground Mounted Solar Less Than 15 KW Plan Review $204 State Law Caps at $450 up to 15 kw (204+385 = $589)
Each additional 15 KW $7.50
State Law Caps at $15 FBHR is $16 (8+8 = $16)
Residential Roof Mounted Solar Less Than 15 KW Permit $385 State Law Caps at $450 up to 15 kw (204+385 = $589)
Each additional 15 KW $7.50
State Law Caps at $15 FBHR is $16 (8+8 = $16)
Commercial Ground Mounted Solar Less than 50 KW Plan Review $407 State Law Caps at $1,000 up to 50kw (407+963 =
$1,370)
Commercial Ground Mounted Solar 51-250 KW Plan Review each KW $3.50 State Law Caps each KW from 51-250 to $7 Actual Fee
$16
Commercial Ground Mounted Solar 251+ KW Plan Review each KW $2.50 State Law Caps each KW over 250 to $5 Actual Fee $16
Commercial Ground Mounted Solar Less than 50 KW Permit $963 State Law Caps at $1,000 up to 50kw (407+963 =
$1,370)
Commercial Ground Mounted Solar 51-250 KW Permit each KW $3.50 State Law Caps each KW from 51-250 to $7 Actual Fee
$16
Commercial Ground Mounted Solar 251+ KW Permit each KW $2.50 State Law Caps each KW over 250 to $5 Actual Fee $16
Battery Storage
1st Battery Plan Review $95
Each Additional Battery $32
1st Battery Permit $357
Each Additional Battery $44
Battery Storage with Solar Installation Plan Review $126 Battery Storage with Solar Installation Permit $44
Temporary Electrical Prior to FInal $223
Temporary Power Poles $223
Each Span Pole $14
FIXTURE COUNTS
To be used only when flat or valuation fee is not
applicable
Receptacles, Switches, Fixtures and Outlets
Each receptacle, switch, fixture, or outlet, lights $5

Page 727 of 1234 ends

REF # FEE TITLE FEE AMOUNT
Residential Appliance-For fixed residential appliances or receptacle outlets for same, including wall-mounted electric ovens; counter-mounted cooking tops; electric ranges; self-contained room, console or through-wall air conditions; space heater; food waste grinders; dishwashers; washing machines; water heaters; clothes dryers; or other motor-operated appliances not exceeding 1 horsepower (HP)
$7
Non-Residential Appliance-For nonresidential appliances and self-contained factory-wired, nonresidential appliances not exceeding 1 horsepower (HP), kilowatt (kW) or kilovolt-ampere (kVA) in rating, including medical and dental devices; food, beverage and ice cream cabinets; illuminated show cases; drinking fountains; vending machines; laundry machines; or other similar types of equipment.
$7
Power Apparatus
Power Apparatus: Up To 1 HP, kW, Or kVA $7
Power Apparatus: 1- 10 HP, kW, Or kVA $24
Power Apparatus: 11 - 50 HP, kW, Or kVA $36
Power Apparatus: 50 - 100 HP, kW, Or kVA $71
Power Apparatus: > 100 HP, kW, Or kVA $107
Busway and Trolley
Busway - Plug-In Typw - Each 100 LF $7
Trolley - Each 100 LF $7
Signs, Outline Lighting and Marquees
For signs, outline lighting systems or marquees supplied from one branch circuit $36 For additional branch circuits within the same sign, outline lighting system or marquee
$7
Services (Service Change)
Service Entrance - 600V or 1000A $107
Temporary Power Service
Temporary Pedestal $36
Temporary Distribution System $12
Temporary Lighting $12
Carnival or Circus
Generator $24
Generator and Electrically Driven Ride $24
Other Rides or Displays with Electrical Lighting $7
System of Area and Booth Lighting $7
Motors
Motor 1HP or Less $16
Motor 1HP < 10 HP $43
Motor 10HP <50 HP $58
Motor 50 HP <100 HP $102
Motor 100 HP and Up $102

PLUMBING
Plumbing Permit Processing Fee - Residential $63
Minimum Plumbing Permit Fee-Residential $156
Plumbing Permit Processing Fee - Commercial $84
Minimum Plumbing Permit Fee-Commercial $156
Processing fee simaltaneously with other MEP permit $21 Plumbing Only Plan Review Fee 10% of Plumbing Permit Fee PLUMBING FIXED FEES
Gas Line $271
Gas Re-Piping $208
Septic System - New or Replacement $617
Sewer Hook-up $331
Sewer Connection Application $25
Sewer Repair $208
Temporary Gas Prior to Final $223
Tub to Walk-in Shower $420
Water Heater $89
Water Re-Piping $208
Water Heater - Tankless $241

Page 728 of 1234 ends

REF # FEE TITLE FEE AMOUNT
FIXTURE COUNTS
To be used only when flat or valuation fee is not
applicable
Cesspool
For each private sewage disposal system, ex: septic tank $71 For each industrial waste pretreatment interceptor, including its trap and vent, excepting kitchen-type grease interceptors functioning as fixture traps $36
Fixtures and Vents
For each plumbing fixture or trap or set of fixtures on one trap (including water, drainage piping and backflow protection thereof)
$12
For repair or alteration of drainage or vent piping $5
Each Drain Piping, Drinking fountain, urinal, water piping, floor drain, washer (auto), laundry tray, kitchen sink, water closet, lavatory, shower, bath tub. $20
Gas Piping System
1-4 outlets - Per Outlet $5
5 or More Outlets - Per Outlet $3
House Sewer $45
Lawn Sprinkler, Vacuum Breaker, Backflow Pretection Devices Lawn Sprinkler System on any one meter, including backflow protect $17 Each Backflow Protection Device 2 inches or smaller $17 Each Backflow Protection Device over 2 inches $36
Miscellaneous $17
Lateral Connection $143
Leach System $65
Sewers, Disposal Systems and Interceptors
For each residential building sewer and each trailer park sewer $36 Rainwater systems - per drain (inside building)$12
Sewage Disposal $103
Water Piping and Water Heater
For installation, alteration, or repair of water piping or water-treating equipment, or both
$5
For each water heater including vent $17

MECHANICAL
Mechanical Permit Processing Fee - Residential $63
Minimum Mechanical Permit Fee-Residential $156
Mechanical Permit Processing Fee - Commercial $84
Minimum Mechanical Permit Fee-Commercial $156
Processing fee simaltaneously with other MEP permit $21 Mechanical Only Plan Review Fee 10% of Mechanical Permit Fee MECHANICAL FIXED FEES
Furnace - Floor $89
Furnace - Wall $268
Fireplace $104
HVAC Change-Out - Commercial - First Unit $223
HVAC Change-Out - Commercial - Each Additional Unit $45 HVAC Change-Out - Residential $134
Incinerator - Domestic $134
Incinerator - Commercial/Industrial $325
Vent System- Hood $12
FIXTURE COUNTS
To be used only when flat or valuation fee is not
applicable
Air Handling Unit
Up to 10,000 CFM $12
Over 10,000 CFM $24
Appliance Vent $7
For the installation, relocation or replacement of each appliance vent installed and not included in an appliance permit.

Boiler, Compressor, Absorption System
Up to 3 HP/100,000 btu/h $17
Over 3 HP/ 100,000 btu/h $29
Ductwork $43
Evaporative Cooler $12
Forced Heating System $43
Furnace
Up to 100,000 btu/h $17

Page 729 of 1234 ends

REF # FEE TITLE FEE AMOUNT
Over 100,000 btu/h $24
For the installation or relocation of each floor furnace, including vent.$17 For the installation or relocation of each suspended heater, recessed wall heater or floor-mounted unit heater.
$17
Misc. Equipment $12
Repairs or Additions
For the repair of, alteration of, or addition to each heating appliance, refrigeration unit, cooling unit, absorption unit, or each heating, cooling, absorption or evaporative cooling system, including installation of controls regulated by the Mechanical Code.
$17
Ventilation and Exhaust
For each ventilation fan connected to a single duct $7
For each ventilation system which is not a portion of any heating or air-conditioning system authorized by a permit
$12
For the installation of each hood which is served by mechanical exhaust, including the ducts for such hood.
$12
APPENDIX E – ANIMAL LICENSE FEE AMOUNT
Beaumont
1 Year License Altered $25
2 Year License Altered $40
3 Year License Altered $55
1 Year Unaltered $100
Late License Fee $25
Replacement Tag $25
Banning
1 Year License Altered
This fee should be removed from the fee schedule as
the service is no longer provided
2 Year License Altered
This fee should be removed from the fee schedule as
the service is no longer provided
3 Year License Altered
This fee should be removed from the fee schedule as
the service is no longer provided
1 Year Unaltered
This fee should be removed from the fee schedule as
the service is no longer provided
Late License Fee
This fee should be removed from the fee schedule as
the service is no longer provided
Replacement Tag
This fee should be removed from the fee schedule as
the service is no longer provided
Calimesa
1 Year License Altered $25
2 Year License Altered $40
3 Year License Altered $55
1 Year Unaltered $100
Late License Fee $25
Replacement Tag $25
Shelter Fees ‐ Determined by Ramona Humane Society

Page 730 of 1234 ends

APPENDIX D ‐ FIRE FEES
FIRE PLAN CHECK
FEE AMOUNT
FIRE INSPECTION
FEE AMOUNT
Minimum Inspection Fee $150
Fire Fees For Sprinkler Permits (FSS)
New 13, 13R Fire Sprinkler System plan check (base fee)$525 New 13, 13R Fire Sprinkler System inspection (per sprinkler head)$7 New 13D Fire Sprinkler System plan check (base fee)$225 New 13D Fire Sprinkler System inspection (per sprinkler head) (each separate plan type)$7
TI 13, 13R Fire Sprinkler System plan check (base fee)$375 TI 13, 13R Fire Sprinkler System inspection (per sprinkler head)$7 TI 13D Fire Sprinkler System plan check (base fee)$187
TI 13D Fire Sprinkler System inspection (per sprinkler head)$7 Construction Reinspection Fee $150
Alternate methods and materials (initial - 4 hrs. min.)$600 Alternate methods and materials Plan Review (addtl. hrs.)$150 Consultant Fire Plan Review Actual consultant cost + 20% admin fee Misc./Over the Counter/ Revisions $150
3rd review and subsequent submittals (per hour)$150
Expedited Plan Review (per hour)$225
Overtime Inspection (per hour) $225
Work without Permit (PENALTY)$300
Fire Fees For Alarm Permits (FAL)
New Fire Alarm System plan check (base fee)$525
New Fire Alarm System inspection (per initiating or notification device)$7 TI Fire Alarm System Plan Check (base fee)$375
TI Fire Alarm System Inspection (per initiating or notification device)$7 Monitoring Only Plan Check $150
Monitoring Only Inspection $150
Construction Reinspection Fee $150
Alternate methods and materials (initial - 4 hrs. min.)$600 Alternate methods and materials (addtl hrs.)$150
Consultant Fire Plan Review Actual consultant cost + 20% admin fee Misc./Over the Counter/ Revisions $150
3rd review and subsequent submittals (per hour)$150
Expedited Plan Review (per hour)$225
Overtime Inspection (per hour) $225
Work without Permit (PENALTY)$300
Fire Fees For Water System Permits (FTW)
Underground plan check (per connection)$225
Underground inspection (per connection)$300
Fire Pump plan check $450
Fire Pump inspection $375
Aboveground Temporary Tank plan check $225
Aboveground Temporary Tank inspection $225
Emergency Underground Repair plan check $225
Emergency Underground Repair inspection $450
Standpipes/Hose valves plan check $225
Standpipes/Hose valves inspection $300
Construction Reinspection Fee $150
Alternate methods and materials (initial - 4 hrs. min.)$600 Alternate methods and materials (addtl. hrs.)$150
Consultant Fire Plan Review Actual consultant cost + 20% admin fee Misc./Over the Counter/ Revisions $150
3rd review and subsequent submittals (per hour)$150
Expedited Plan Review (per hour)$225
Overtime Inspection (per hour) $225
Work without Permit (PENALTY)$300
Fire Fees For Protection Systems Permits (FPS)
Special Extinguishing System plan check $412
Special Extinguishing System inspection $225
Hood and Duct Extinguishing System plan check (per system)$225 Hood and Duct Extinguishing System inspection (per system)$225 Smoke Control - Rationale Analysis and Plan Review $1,050 Smoke Control System inspection $900
Construction Reinspection Fee $150
Alternate methods and materials (initial - 4 hrs. min.)$600 Alternate methods and materials (addtl. hrs.)$150
Consultant Fire Plan Review Actual consultant cost + 20% admin fee Misc./Over the Counter/ Revisions $150
3rd review and subsequent submittals (per hour)$150
Expedited Review (per hour)$225
Overtime Inspection (per hour) $225
Work without Permit (PENALTY)$300
Fire Fees For Other Systems Permits (FOS)
Special Equipment (Oven, Dust, etc) plan check $300

Page 731 of 1234 ends

APPENDIX D ‐ FIRE FEES
FIRE PLAN CHECK
FEE AMOUNT
FIRE INSPECTION
FEE AMOUNT
Special Equipment (Oven, Dust, etc) inspection $300
Battery Energy Sytems - Commercial plan check $300
Battery Energy Sytems - Commercial inspection $300
Battery Energy Sytems - Residential under 20 kWh plan check $150 Battery Energy Sytems - Residential under 20 kWh inspection $0 Battery Energy Sytems - Residential over 20 kWh plan check $150 Battery Energy Sytems - Residential over 20 kWh inspection $150 Refrigeration System 100 Chemicals plan check $825
Haz-Mat Chem Class >100 Chemicals inspection $525
Underground Storage Tanks plan check (per tank) Installation or Removal $338 Underground Storage Tanks inspection (per tank) Installation or Removal $112 Aboveground Storage Tanks plan check (per tank) Installation or Removal $338 Aboveground Storage Tanks inspection (per tank) Installation or Removal $112 Alterations to gas stations plan check (no tank alterations)$225 Alterations to gas stations inspection (no tank alterations)$150 Construction Reinspection Fee $150
Alternate methods and materials (initial - 4 hrs. min.)$600 Alternate methods and materials Plan Review (addtl. hrs.)$150 Consultant Fire Plan Review Actual consultant cost + 20% admin fee Misc./Over the Counter/Revisions $150
3rd review and subsequent submittals (per hour)$150
Expedited Plan Review (per hour)$225
Overtime Inspection (per hour) $225
Work without Permit (PENALTY)$300
Fire Fees For High Pile Storage Permits (FHP)
High Pile Storage <12,000 sq. ft. plan check $300
High Pile Storage <12,000 sq. ft. Inspection $300
High Pile Storage 12,001 - 50,000 sq. ft. plan check $600

Page 732 of 1234 ends

APPENDIX D ‐ FIRE FEES
FIRE PLAN CHECK
FEE AMOUNT
FIRE INSPECTION
FEE AMOUNT
High Pile Storage 12,001 - 50,000 sq. ft. Inspection $600 High Pile Storage 50,001 - 100,000 sq. ft. plan check $900 High Pile Storage 50,001 - 100,000 sq. ft. Inspection $900 High Pile Storage > 100,000 sq. ft. plan check $1,200
High Pile Storage > 100,000 sq. ft. Inspection $1,200
Construction Reinspection Fee $150
Alternate methods and materials (initial - 4 hrs. min.)$600 Alternate methods and materials Plan Review (addtl. hrs.)$150 Consultant Fire Plan Review Actual consultant cost + 20% admin fee Misc./Over the Counter/Revisions $150
3rd review and subsequent submittals (per hour)$150
Expedited Plan Review (per hour)$225
Overtime Inspection (per hour) $225
Work without Permit (PENALTY)$300
Fire Fees For Hazard Abatement (FHA)
Hazard Reduction Inspection, per inspection $150
Hazard Reduction Abatement Administrative Fee $300
Hazard Reduction Abatement Cost Recovery actual costs
Fire Fees For Tumbleweed Abatement (FTA)
Hazard Reduction Inspection, per inspection $150
Hazard Reduction Abatement Administrative Fee $300
Hazard Reduction Abatement Cost Recovery actual costs
Fire Fees For Inspections (FIN)
Residential Care Facility 6 or less Pre-inspection $150 Residential Day Care Facility 8-14 Fire Clearance $150
Special Event WITH tents and/or canopies >400 sq. ft. $300 $300 Special Event with NO tents and/or canopies $150 $150
Carnivals and Fairs $300 $300
Food Trucks $150 $150
Firework Displays $900
Complaints (not on fee schedule but is documented under this record type) $0 Fire Clearances (not on fee schedule but is documented under this record type for hospital, res. care facility 850 fire clearance, etc)$0 Hydrant/Control Valve Flow Test $225
Fire Standby (per hour)$150
Miscellaneous Inspection (uses 1 hour of the hourly rate fee)$150 Annual Fire Code Permits (CFC Operational Permits)
Aerosol Products Level 2 & 3 $75
Open Flame and/ or Candles in Assembly Occupancies $75
Cellulose Nitrate $75
Combustible Fibers $150
Combustible Materials $75
Compressed Gases $150
Cryogenic Fluids $150
Dispensing of Flammable/Combustible liquids into a vehicle $150 Dry Cleaning Plants 1-2 units $75
Dry Cleaning Plants > 2 units $225
Combustible Dust Producing & Operations $150
Covered and Uncovered Mall Buildings $225
Explosives $150
Flammable/Combustible Liquids Inside ≥60 Gal.$150
Flammable/Combustible Liquids Inside 100,000 sq. ft. $600 Industrial Ovens/Drying $150
Liquefied Petroleum Gases $75
Liquid or Gas Filled Vehicles in Assemblies $150
Miscellaneous Combustible Storage $150
Motor Vehicle Repair $150
Storage of Tires $150
Places of Assembly $150
Pyrotechnical Special Effects $600
Spray Booths/ Dipping Operations $150
Welding and Cutting $75
Special Amusement Buildings $225
Hazardous Production Materials $150
Lumber yards and woodworking plants $300
Magnesium $75
Refrigeration Equipment <500 lbs.$150

Page 733 of 1234 ends

APPENDIX D ‐ FIRE FEES
FIRE PLAN CHECK
FEE AMOUNT
FIRE INSPECTION
FEE AMOUNT
Refrigeration Equipment ≥500 lbs.$300
Additive Manufacturing (3D Printing)$150
Energy Storage Systems $300
Mobile Fueling of Hydrogen-Fueled Vehicles $150
Motor Fuel-Dispensing Facilities $150
Lithium Batteries $150
Fire Fees For Business Annuals (Fire # FBP)
A-1 occupancies: Assembly uses, usually with fixed seating, intended for the production and viewing of performing arts or motion pictures 350,000 sq. ft.$900 H or L Occupancy $450
2nd Re-Inspection Penalty (Penalty of $150 + reinspection fee $150 = $300) $300 3rd + Re-inspection Penalty (Penalty of $250 + reinspection fee $150 = $400)$400
Work without Permit (PENALTY)$300
Fire Fees For Multi Family Annuals (Fire # FMF)
R-1 Occupancy (i.e. hotels, motels) 100 units $900
R-2 Occupancy (i.e. Res Permanent 3+) per unit $37
Care Facility Commercial 0-50 State Licensed $300
Care Facility Commercial 51-99 State Licensed $375
Care Facility Commercial 100-150 State Licensed $450
Care Facility Commercial ≥ 151 State Licensed $600
2nd Re-Inspection Penalty (Penalty of $150 + reinspection fee $150 = $300) $300 3rd + Re-inspection Penalty (Penalty of $250 + reinspection fee $150 = $400)$400
Work without Permit (PENALTY)$300
Fire Fees For State Mandates Annuals (Fire # FSM)
E Occupancy (Schools) 10,000 sq. ft.$600
Hospitals 10,000 S.F.$600
Skilled Nursing 10,000 S.F.$600
Jail 10,000 S.F.$600
High-Rise 75' or more $900
Day Care Facilities Commercial 0-50 $150
Day Care Facilities Commercial 51-100 $225
Day Care Facilities Commercial 101-150 $300
Day Care Facilities Commercial >150 $375
2nd Re-Inspection Penalty (Penalty of $150 + reinspection fee $150 = $300) $300 3rd + Re-inspection Penalty (Penalty of $250 + reinspection fee $150 = $400)$400
Work without Permit (PENALTY)$300

Page 734 of 1234 ends

APPENDIX D ‐ FIRE FEES
FIRE PLAN CHECK
FEE AMOUNT
FIRE INSPECTION
FEE AMOUNT
Miscellaneous Fire Fees
Inspection (per hour)$150
Plan Review (per hour)$150
Consultant Fire Plan Review Actual consultant cost + 20% admin fee

Page 735 of 1234 ends

September 2022
Prepared by:

Revenue & Cost Specialists, LLC
1519 E Chapman Ave, Ste C
Fullerton, CA 92831
www.revenuecost.com
(714) 992-9020

Page 736 of 1234 ends

Cost of Services Study for the City of Beaumont

Page 737 of 1234 ends

Cost of Services Study for the City of Beaumont

September 6, 2022

Honorable Mayor and City Council
via Jennifer Ustation, Director of Finance
City of Beaumont
550 E 6th Street
Beaumont, Ca 92223

Honorable Mayor, City Council, and Ms. Ustation:

This Report is submitted pursuant to our contract with the City to perform a revenue and cost analysis for the City for its services.

The motivation for this study is the need of both the City Council and City staff to maintain City’s services at a level commensurate with the standards previously set by the City Council, and to maintain effective policy and management control of City services.

This Report provides currently useful information about the City’s status on recovery of costs for all City services. In addition, it will assist in projecting and determining the future level and equity of these City services.

RCS wishes to thank all City department heads and staff for their assistance and cooperation extended to us during the accomplishment of our work, without whose aid this Report could not have been produced. The response, awareness and information gathered and supplied by numerous City employees make this Report the sound one we believe it to be.

We also believe that your constituents will appreciate your subjecting the City’s operations to business costing methodologies, and your willingness to be informed of the true and full costs of those services which you have decided the City should provide its citizens.

Respectfully submitted,

ERIC JOHNSON CHU THAI
President Vice President

Page 738 of 1234 ends

Cost of Services Study for the City of Beaumont
Table of Contents
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY __________________________________________________________________________________ 5

CHAPTER I – BACKGROUND OF STUDY ________________________________________________________________ 9

CHAPTER II – IDENTIFYING AND COSTING SERVICES _______________________________________________ 13

CHAPTER III – REVENUES MATCHED AGAINST COSTS ______________________________________________ 19

CHAPTER IV – SERVICE REVENUE RECOMMENDATIONS ____________________________________________ 25

CONCLUSION ___________________________________________________________________________________________ 37

APPENDIX A – SUMMARY OF CURRENT FEES AND PROPOSED FEES _______________________________ 39

APPENDIX B – SUMMARY WORKSHEETS MATCHED WITH COST DETAIL WORKSHEETS _________ 71

APPENDIX C – BUILDING & SAFETY FEE DETAIL __________________________________________________ 413

APPENDIX D – FIRE PREVENTION FEE DETAIL ____________________________________________________ 419

APPENDIX E – ANIMAL LICENSE FEE DETAIL ______________________________________________________ 427

APPENDIX F – LESIURE & CULTURAL SERVICES FEE DETAIL _____________________________________ 429

Page 739 of 1234 ends

Pg. 05 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Cost of Services Study for the City of Beaumont

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Revenue & Cost Specialists (RCS) has subjected the City's operations to a detailed analysis seeking alternate and more equitable ways to finance its services. This report presents the analytical advantages which are available to the City through the institution of a comprehensive system designed by RCS to implement Article XIIIB of the California Constitution.

Based on data presented in this report, the City Council can better respond to the limits on tax revenues available to the City as well as the constant demand for higher and more operational services and capital improvements. Due to demands made of the City, it is essential that the Council and City management have additional information upon which to assist in charting a future financial course that will preserve the quality of life which its citizens have come to expect.

Systematic and Documented Approach. This analysis was designed to provide the City with a systematic and documented approach to understand, control, and recapture the costs which are forced on it by normal service demands, growth and general economic inflation.

Constitutional Methodology. The methodology used for this analysis is the "costs reasonably borne" test established by Section 8(c) of Proposition 4, now Article XIIIB of the California Constitution. In following that process, RCS has analyzed the ways in which City services can be financed more equitably to assure the City's future financial viability.

Full Business Costs Determined. The methodology followed by both the Authors of Proposition 4, and consequently by RCS, determines the full business cost of providing the reported City services.

It also identifies the beneficiaries of those services and determines if they are paying in relationship to benefits derived or if they are deserving of a subsidy paid from the taxes paid by all local citizens and businesses. Thus, the City Council will have full knowledge of costs which are actually occurring.

Financial Integrity Established. This report summarizes the work accomplished and presents recommendations. These recommendations, if implemented, would establish the financial integrity of the analyzed City services and would establish a continuing cost control system following the business principles which are generally espoused for government, but often are ignored in application.

Identifying Service Center
There are three basic steps in the process used by RCS. The first step is to identify the services offered by the City. Next, the service costs are calculated. Finally, the revenue currently received is matched to the cost of providing the service to determine if there is a subsidy from taxes.

5 Page 740 of 1234

Pg. 06 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Cost of Services Study for the City of Beaumont
Refinement Process. In a series of meetings held with City staff, department by department, we developed a list of services, and then allocated staff time to the appropriate services. This service time was refined over the course of these meetings until all available staff time was allocated and represented an accurate allocation.

Personal Choice versus Community Supported Services
Personal Choice Services are those offered to identifiable customers at a measured level. They are also services that can be withheld for non-payment. These services are not precisely likened to fee- based services to the extent that policy makers may have decided to subsidize them in full or part.

These services are distinguished from Community Supported Services that carry an implicit requirement and rationale for setting a level of subsidization typically based on social, safety or general community welfare.

Summary of Results
If all the recommendations and suggestions made in this Report are adopted, the City of Beaumont would increase cost recovery by $702,300 on an annual basis. By taking such actions, far more equity between taxpayers and fee-payers would be gained, and the City’s financial picture would be improved.

Policy Review Information
As the Council conducts its policy review of each of the revenue-cost match-ups, it should refer to Appendix A and also to the text in Chapter IV to assist in that review.

The policy review should assess the tax revenues used to subsidize each service and address the following options available to the City for each service center:

1. Reduce costs and thereby the tax subsidy by reducing the level of service or restructuring the service to provide it differently.

2. Adjust or institute a fee or charge to recover all of the "costs reasonably borne".

3. Eliminate a tax subsidy to another "less deserving" service to utilize the taxes in order to provide this service.

TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL POSSIBLE

FEE SERVICE PROFIT/ NEW

SERVICE REVENUE COST (SUBSIDY) ACTUAL SUGGEST REVENUE
(2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8)
[S-001 to S-106] COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT $3,804,984 $4,036,726 ($231,742) 94.3% VAR. $255,550 [S-107 to S-153] PUBLIC SAFETY $376,296 $1,082,598 ($706,302) 34.8% VAR. $234,850 [S-154 to S-156] LEISURE & CULTURAL $149,770 $1,655,091 ($1,505,321) 9.0% VAR. $0 [S-157 to S-162] ENTERPRISE $0 $44,734 ($44,734) 0.0%VAR. $44,700 [S-163 to S-171] ADMINISTRATIVE $85,789 $248,175 ($162,386) 34.6% VAR. $167,200 $4,416,839 $7,067,324 ($2,650,485) 62.5% $702,300
PCT. RECOVERY

FROM FEES

If all the
recommendations
and suggestions
made in this Report
are adopted, the City
of Beaumont would
increase cost
recovery by
$702,300 on an
annual basis
6 Page 741 of 1234

Pg. 07 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Cost of Services Study for the City of Beaumont
Result of Acceptance of Fee Suggestions
If the suggestions in Chapter IV and in the fee recommendations in Appendix A are adopted in full then a significant amount of added revenues will be available to the City, which would provide taxpayer equity. Most of these new revenues will be from fee increases to replace tax monies used to make up the difference between fees collected and costs incurred in providing the services, which will then be available for those services which can only be funded from taxes.

These tax "diversions" are the now-documented tax subsidies to potentially self-supporting City services. Thus, additional monies could be made available for police services, infrastructure maintenance, and other City services which are not generally conducive to service charges, thereby achieving much closer equity between benefits and associated payments.

Policy Guidance. More importantly, the Council would be able to make its decisions based on business principles as much as is possible.

Understanding of Equitable Charging for Government. The City Council now has to assist its constituents to understand that under the California Constitution the intent is that:

 Taxes finance services for which there is no alternative way to finance them.  Service charges should be utilized to finance those things for which benefits can be determined.
 Beneficiaries of such services be charged in direct relationship to the benefits derived.

7 Page 742 of 1234

Pg. 08 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Cost of Services Study for the City of Beaumont

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK

8 Page 743 of 1234

Pg. 09 CHAPTER I – BACKGROUND OF STUDY

Cost of Services Study for the City of Beaumont
CHAPTER I – BACKGROUND OF STUDY
Revenue & Cost Specialist has subjected the City's operations to a detailed analysis seeking alternate and more equitable ways to finance its services. This report presents the analytical advantages which are available to the City through the institution of a comprehensive system designed by RCS to implement Article XIIIB of the California Constitution.

Based on data presented in this report, the City Council can better respond to the limits on tax revenues available to the City as well as the constant demand for higher and more operational services and capital improvements. Due to demands made of the City, it is essential that the Council and City management have additional information upon which to assist in charting future financial course that will preserve the quality of life which its citizens have come to expect.

Full Business Costs Determined. The methodology followed by both the Authors of Proposition 4, and consequently by RCS, determines the full business cost of providing the reported City services.

Financial Integrity Established. This text summarizes the work accomplished and presents recommendations. These recommendations, if implemented, would firmly establish the financial integrity of the analyzed City services and would establish a continuing cost control system following the business principles which are generally espoused for government, but often are ignored in application.

Financing Adjustments Pursuant to Proposition 4
Proposition 4, which is more commonly referred to as the "Gann Spirit of 13 'Let's Finish the Job' Initiative", was adopted by 74.3% of the voters of California on November 6, 1979. It became effective on July 1, 1980, retroactive to Fiscal Year 1978-1979. Statutes clarifying certain 9 Page 744 of 1234

Pg. 10 CHAPTER I – BACKGROUND OF STUDY

Cost of Services Study for the City of Beaumont
provisions of the Proposition, which is now Article XIIIB of the California Constitution, became effective January 1, 1981.

This report provides data to the City for reviewing the reported fee-financed services based on full-costing information and for implementing the "costs reasonably borne" provision of this Constitutional Article, within presently known legal parameters and the authors' pronounced and published intent.

Adjustments to Financing. As a result of this analysis, the City now possesses the basis for making necessary adjustments to its methods of financing services for those services reported on herein. It can achieve a more equitable and fair mix for financing those services and capital needs, using taxes and service charges, in the direction pointed by passage of Article XIIIB, and the business methodologies inherent in that Article.

It should be remembered from the start that taxes are now limited and controlled, and therefore the capability of using these taxes to subsidize "special" services which are wholly or partially fee- financed is also limited.

The "Costs Reasonably Borne" Test. The "costs reasonably borne" process as envisioned by the Authors of Proposition 4 implies a direct relationship between payment of fees and charges and receipt of services. It also implies the use of taxes for financing those governmental activities which humanely and properly cannot be financed other than by taxes.

Desirability of Direct Relationship between Payment and Service This direct fee-for-service and tax equity relationship does not exist when tax monies are used to subsidize services which are received by only a small portion of the taxpaying public or by non- residents. A major underlying goal of this project is to provide information and guidance to the Council on how the City can continue as a viable financial entity, finance the services and facilities that its citizens and business enterprises have come to expect, and yet in the long run be able to live within the limits imposed by Article XIIIB and Propositions 13 and 218.

At the same time, the City can in great part re-establish basic fairness and equity between users of City services and those who pay for them and control those costs on a continuing basis.

Impact of Propositions 4, 13, 26, and 218
Initiative 4 of November 1979, coupled with its immediate predecessor – Proposition 13 of a year earlier – wrought the greatest changes in California governmental financing in a century.

Proposition 218, passed in 1996 and becoming Articles XIIIC & D, further limited local governments’ revenue source options. Those propositions have had, and will continue to have, a profound effect on California governments.
10 Page 745 of 1234

Pg. 11 CHAPTER I – BACKGROUND OF STUDY

Cost of Services Study for the City of Beaumont

Effects on the City. One effect of these propositions has been a constant search for new revenue sources to finance services required by the City. However, at the same time, State and Federal program revenues continue to decrease. Consequently, the City faces the prospect of declining revenue with which to fund City services.

Costs Exceeding Revenues. The full costs of delivering the City's defined fee-financed services -- as defined in business terms by the authors of Article XIIIB, and as applied by the business methods of this analysis as based on that Constitutional Article -- are running at an annual rate beyond current or expected fee revenues. The result is the diversion of tax monies to make up the difference between fee revenues collected and full business costs incurred.

Variety of Equitable Revenue Sources. This analysis presents a wide variety of ways in which revenue can surely and legally be raised and as important, more equitably raised than at present.

The amount of new revenues to be raised is dependent upon the Council's determination of the level of support for essential services.

Proposition 26. With the passage of Proposition 26 in 2010, these principles were codified with some changes. Article XIII C of the State Constitution was amended to formally declare that fees are not considered taxes if they do not exceed the reasonable costs of the service.

Some of the types of services for which reasonable fees are allowable are:

(1) A charge imposed for a specific benefit conferred or privilege granted directly to the payor that is not provided to those not charged, and which does not exceed the reasonable costs to the local government of conferring the benefit or granting the privilege. (2) A charge imposed for a specific government service or product provided directly to the payor that is not provided to those not charged, and which does not exceed the reasonable costs to the local government of providing the service or product. (3) A charge imposed for the reasonable regulatory costs to a local government for issuing licenses and permits, performing investigations, inspections, and audits, enforcing agricultural marketing orders, and the administrative enforcement and adjudication thereof.

Article XIII C also provides that a local government agency must demonstrate that the amount of revenue to be generated by a fee is no more than necessary to cover the reasonable costs of the governmental activity supported by the fee, and that the manner in which those costs are allocated to a payor bear a fair or reasonable relationship to the payor’s burdens on, or benefits received from, the governmental activity. This Report was prepared in accordance with these principles.

11 Page 746 of 1234

Pg. 12 CHAPTER I – BACKGROUND OF STUDY

Cost of Services Study for the City of Beaumont
Text Topics
The remaining Chapters of this text address the following topics:

II. Identifying and Costing Service Centers
III. Overview of Service Revenues Matched Against Costs IV. Service Revenue Recommendations
V. Conclusion

12 Page 747 of 1234

Pg. 13 CHAPTER II – IDENTIFYING AND COSTING SERVICES

Cost of Services Study for the City of Beaumont
CHAPTER II – IDENTIFYING AND COSTING

SERVICES
There are three basic steps in the process used by RCS to identify and cost out service centers. The first step is to identify the services offered by the City. Next, the service costs are calculated.

Finally, the revenue currently received is matched to the cost of providing the service to determine if there is a subsidy from taxes. This chapter covers the first two steps and Chapter III shows the match-up of revenues and costs.

Identifying Service Centers
Two techniques were utilized to identify the service centers for which revenue and cost data were gathered and around which the service cost analysis of this Report is built.

Revenue Analysis. The first technique involved gathering revenue information for the past fiscal year, and then updating and revising the budget estimates for the same revenue sources for the fiscal year during which the analysis was performed by RCS. The Budget and financial reports for the current fiscal year were secured and analyzed. Budgeted and received revenues for all fee- supported services were extracted from those reports, where such information was available. RCS has divided services into far smaller "service centers" than the City has traditionally designated.

Service Center Identification. The second technique involved several scheduled meetings with City staff to identify each type of service being provided with or without charge. In a series of meetings held with City staff, department by department, RCS developed a comprehensive list of services, and then allocated staff time to the appropriate services. This service time was refined over the course of these meetings until all available staff time was allocated and represented an accurate allocation.

Resultant Service Centers
"Service Center" Defined. The "service revenue," fee or charge for a service, and the related "service cost" comprise a "service center". Each service center has a unique "Revenue and Cost Summary Worksheet" and a matching "Cost Detail Worksheet”, which are found in Appendix B of this Report. These "Service Center Worksheets" are matched to one another on facing pages.

Detailed Back-Up Workpapers. The costs are backed up by detailed analyses, which have been turned over to the City in several volumes of work papers and detailed cost distribution reports.

Constitutional Basis for Cost of Services
The costs determined by RCS for the various service centers are based on the definitions of “costs reasonably borne” as utilized in Article XIIIB (Proposition 4) and as further defined by its Authors 13 Page 748 of 1234

Pg. 14 CHAPTER II – IDENTIFYING AND COSTING SERVICES

Cost of Services Study for the City of Beaumont
in their background documents. The Authors of Proposition 4 intended their full business costing definitions to be used by California governments. Thus, the City can know and control its costs, using those Constitutionally-set business principles and legally set elements and definitions of “costs reasonably borne”.

Listing of Detailed Full Business Cost Definitions. Thus, the following are put forward by the Authors as the accepted elements of "costs reasonably borne":
a) Labor costs
b) Employee benefit costs
c) Operational services and supply expenses
d) Overhead expense
e) Administrative costs
f) Start-up costs
g) Future capital expenses
h) Capital replacement expense
i) Costs of expansion of services
j) Repayment of debt

Authors' Background. It is not surprising that the authors used such business definitions and elements of "cost" as quoted herein. They represented several known business organizations:
 The California Taxpayers Association
 The California Chamber of Commerce
 The National Tax Limitation Committee
 The California Association of Realtors

In effect, the pillars of California business and their thinking were represented, and their ideas were adopted overwhelmingly by the electorate of California at referendum. Thus, by definition, the premises of this report process have a California electoral mandate.

Principle Involved. A basic principle involved in this report was the recognition of those full business costs as used and as defined by the authors of the Constitutional amendment.

Types of Costs
The following costs, identified above as part of "costs reasonably borne" by the Authors of Proposition 4, make up the cost detail found on the right-hand page in Appendix B for each service center.

Salaries and Wages. City government is in fact a service industry, and therefore, it is natural that salaries make up the largest single element of cost for most services. In order to allocate the

To validate the
reasonableness of
the Study, 100% of
the available work
hours for all City
employees were
distributed and
accounted for,
even if it’s not
public serving.

14 Page 749 of 1234

Pg. 15 CHAPTER II – IDENTIFYING AND COSTING SERVICES

Cost of Services Study for the City of Beaumont
salaries, lengthy interviews were held, documents sought and researched, and reports and accounting records examined by RCS. The result was, in most cases, a percentage or hours distribution of individual employee personal services costs.

To validate the reasonableness of the Study, 100% of the available work hours for all City employees were distributed and accounted for, even if it’s not public serving. In other words, one staff member cannot state they overworked on fee services beyond 100% of their hours, and another staff member cannot account for 100% of their time. No judgments were made about what personnel should or might be doing. Their time was distributed to those service centers where the time was expended.

Employee Fringe Benefits. Since fractional time, to as low as three minutes per unit of service or one-twentieth of a percent of the annual time of an employee has been allocated to service centers, fringe benefit costs also must be fractionalized to carefully and accurately distribute those ancillary personnel costs.

The City finances numerous benefits for its employees, thereby incurring measurable costs for these items, including:
 Retirement and pension liabilities
 Group Health Insurance
 Life Insurance
 Medicare Insurance
 State Unemployment Insurance
 Workers Compensation Insurance

All of these costs are current operating expenses, and the amounts were isolated. Actual costs were determined and reduced to a percentage of salary for each of the positions.

Available Work-Hours. After the individual elements of cost for positions was compiled, the total cost for each position was divided by the number of available work-hours. Available work hours were calculated as the total possible work-hours in a year, 2,080, less the following away-from- work benefit hours:
 Holidays
 Vacations
 Personal Leave
 Sick Leave
 Morning/Afternoon Breaks
 Start Up/Down Time

15 Page 750 of 1234

Pg. 16 CHAPTER II – IDENTIFYING AND COSTING SERVICES

Cost of Services Study for the City of Beaumont
Maintenance and Operation Costs. All maintenance and operation costs, including non-personnel expenses such as professional services, insurance, operating supplies etc., were derived from the current year Council-approved budget and allocated via percentages or through actual allocation to each of the service centers identified in a department or division.

General and Departmental Overhead Costs. Overhead costs provide the vital glue that holds an organization together operationally and provide important coordinating capabilities. They also provide the day-to-day support services and facilities required for the organization to function effectively. RCS calculated Beaumont’s Cost Allocation Plan (CAP) to identify and allocate these costs to the remainder of the City organization. In the CAP, costs were allocated to end-user departments and divisions by applying an agreed-upon overhead allocation factor. Each factor was related to the work effort of its particular overhead element and was assessed for relevance and reasonableness.

Full Cost Distribution. The purpose of deriving overhead costs to apportion these amounts to direct service program costs. By adopting this method, the City will be aware of its true costs and be able to emulate business methods. Article XIIIB’s (Proposition 4 of 1979) authors intended this, defining as part of “costs reasonably borne” a calculated “reasonable allocation for overhead and administration.”

General City Overhead. These services primarily set policy and support other departments without providing a deliverable service to the public. Where they do perform an end-user service, such costs have not been allocated to other departments. Costs in this general administration category include the following functions:

Administration

16.1%
Legal Services

14.6%
Finance

12.6%
Info Tech

16.3%
HR

6.0%
Risk Mgmt

18.9%
Buildings &
Grounds

15.5%
General City Overhead
16 Page 751 of 1234

Pg. 17 CHAPTER II – IDENTIFYING AND COSTING SERVICES

Cost of Services Study for the City of Beaumont
Departmental Administration. Costs in this category involve intra-departmental support functions, outside the above listed general City overhead functions, and involve the allocation of staff time within and among departmental functions. These services also do not provide end-user deliverables to the public, but instead provide vital administrative support within specific departments.

Fully Allocated Hourly Rates (FAHR)
All of the above items make up the fully allocated hourly rate which is calculated for each position in the City. The makeup of each component of the City-wide average fully allocated hourly rate is detailed in the chart below.

Salaries 41.9%
Benefits 19.8%Operating
Expenses 4.3%
Dept. Overhead

14.2%
City Overhead

19.8%
Fully Allocated Hourly Rate Components
17 Page 752 of 1234

Pg. 18 CHAPTER II – IDENTIFYING AND COSTING SERVICES

Cost of Services Study for the City of Beaumont

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK

18 Page 753 of 1234

Pg. 19 CHAPTER III – REVENUES MATCHED AGAINST COSTS

Cost of Services Study for the City of Beaumont
CHAPTER III – REVENUES MATCHED AGAINST
COSTS
In the last chapter the method of calculating the costs for all City services was identified. This chapter begins with a Summary that itemizes the revenues and costs by service center. Then, an overview is presented of what will be presented in the following chapter, which shows that there is no one solution to the City’s financial challenge.

Accounting for All Revenues – Fees and Taxes
Local government funding comes from a multitude of revenue sources such as taxes, fines, grants, use of property, user fees, utility rates, etc. Our Study accounts for all revenues, and focuses on the relationship between fees and taxes. As an example, Large Group Home CUP (S-005) in the following schedule estimates the full costs at $3,729. These expenses are offset by current fee revenues of $1,118, and tax revenues of $2,611 must pay for the remaining. This subsidy can be eliminated by raising the relevant fees. To the extent that the fees are NOT increased, general City taxes paid by all taxpayers are the only alternative revenue source.

SCHEDULE 1

CITY OF BEAUMONT

SUMMARY OF FEE SERVICES AND CURRENT FINANCING
FISCAL YEAR 2021-22

TOTAL RESOURCES USED

SERVICE TO FINANCE SERVICE
REF# (1) FEE SERVICE (2) COST (3) FEES (4) TAXES (5)

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
S-001 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT $0 $0 $0
S-002 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT $2,713 $0 $2,713 S-003 FINDINGS OF PUBLIC CONV/NECESSITY $2,006 $0 $2,006 S-004 CUP TIME EXTENSION $1,968 $829 $1,139
S-005 LARGE GROUP HOME CUP $3,729 $1,118 $2,611
S-006 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT $0 $0 $0
S-007 ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT CHANGE $0 $0 $0
S-008 SPECIFIC PLAN $0 $0 $0
S-009 SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT $0 $0 $0
S-010 SPEC PLAN CONFORMITY DETERMINATION $0 $0 $0
S-011 ANNEXATION $0 $0 $0
S-012 PLAN OF SERVICES $0 $0 $0
S-013 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT $0 $0 $0
S-014 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT ANNUAL REVIEW $2,165 $3,027 ($862) S-015 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AMENDMENT $0 $0 $0
S-016 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT ASSIGNMENT $0 $0 $0
S-017 ESTOPPEL CERTIFICATE $0 $0 $0
S-018 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW $0 $0 $0
19 Page 754 of 1234

Pg. 20 CHAPTER III – REVENUES MATCHED AGAINST COSTS

Cost of Services Study for the City of Beaumont

TOTAL RESOURCES USED

SERVICE TO FINANCE SERVICE
REF# (1) FEE SERVICE (2) COST (3) FEES (4) TAXES (5)
S-019 FACILITY FEE CREDIT AGREEMENT $0 $0 $0
S-020 DENSITY BONUS AGREEMENT $0 $0 $0
S-021 PRE-APPLICATION MEETING $57,488 $23,606 $33,882 S-022 ZONING MAP CHANGE $0 $0 $0
S-023 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP $0 $0 $0
S-024 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP $0 $0 $0
S-025 TENTATIVE MAP TIME EXTENSION $2,188 $847 $1,341 S-026 CONDOMINIUM CONVERSION $0 $0 $0
S-027 VARIANCE $33,266 $19,900 $13,366
S-028 MINOR VARIANCE/MODIF OF STANDARDS $246 $155 $91 S-029 PLOT PLAN $0 $0 $0
S-030 PLOT PLAN AMENDMENT $0 $0 $0
S-031 PLOT PLAN TIME EXTENSION $2,006 $565 $1,441
S-032 RESIDENTIAL ADMIN PLOT PLAN $19,395 $10,845 $8,550 S-033 NON-RESIDENTIAL ADMIN PLOT PLAN $59,852 $29,954 $29,898 S-034 MINOR PLOT PLAN - STAFF $11,483 $9,759 $1,724
S-035 MINOR PLOT PLAN - PLAN COMM $3,230 $1,220 $2,010 S-036 PICK A LOT SITE PLAN REVIEW $317 $103 $214
S-037 MAP/PLOT PLAN CONFORMITY DETERMIN. $0 $0 $0
S-038 LANDSCAPE PLAN REVIEW $857 $744 $113
S-039 LANDSCAPE PLAN AMENDMENT $857 $615 $242
S-040 LANDSCAPE INSPECTION $205 $82 $123
S-041 SIGN PROGRAM $1,872 $1,653 $219
S-042 SIGN PROGRAM AMENDMENT $1,872 $970 $902
S-043 SIGN PERMIT $376 $207 $169
S-044 SIGN PERMIT PANEL CHANGE $170 $83 $87
S-045 TEMPORARY SIGN PERMIT $170 $0 $170
S-046 UNLICENSED GROUP HOME PERMIT $6,671 $1,600 $5,071 S-047 AUTOMOBILE FOR HIRE REVIEW $2,718 $413 $2,305
S-048 HOME OCCUPATION PERMIT $225 $77 $148
S-049 MINOR SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT $19,327 $1,162 $18,165 S-050 MAJOR SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT $10,392 $387 $10,005 S-051 MISCELLANEOUS SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT $1,000 $77 $923 S-052 APPEAL TO PLANNING COMISSION $2,583 $642 $1,941 S-053 APPEAL TO CITY COUNCIL $2,986 $1,946 $1,040
S-054 PLANNING INFORMATION REQUEST $225 $57 $168
S-055 MISCELLANEOUS PLANNING REVIEW $0 $0 $0
S-056 COM DEV TECHNOLOGY SURCHARGE $170,000 $169,000 $1,000 S-057 BUILDING PLAN CHECK/INSPECTION $2,549,034 $2,876,175 ($327,141) S-058 FINAL PARCEL MAP $0 $0 $0
S-059 FINAL TRACT MAP $0 $0 $0
S-060 TENTATIVE REVERSION TO ACREAGE $0 $0 $0
S-061 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT/PARCEL MERGER $0 $0 $0
S-062 FINAL MONUMENT SETTING $0 $0 $0
S-063 FINAL MONUMENT INSPECTION $0 $0 $0
20 Page 755 of 1234

Pg. 21 CHAPTER III – REVENUES MATCHED AGAINST COSTS

Cost of Services Study for the City of Beaumont

TOTAL RESOURCES USED

SERVICE TO FINANCE SERVICE
REF# (1) FEE SERVICE (2) COST (3) FEES (4) TAXES (5)
S-064 PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN CHECK $8,460 $0 $8,460 S-065 RESIDENTIAL GRADING PLAN CHECK $68,439 $50,282 $18,157 S-066 RES GRADING PLAN CHECK AMENDMENT $0 $0 $0
S-067 RES GRADING PLAN CHECK ADD'L REVIEW $0 $0 $0
S-068 COMMERCIAL GRADING PLAN CHECK $29,268 $19,509 $9,759 S-069 COMMERCIAL GRADING PLAN AMENDMENT $0 $0 $0
S-070 COMM GRADING PLAN CHECK ADD'L REV $0 $0 $0
S-071 GRADING/STOCKPILE INSPECTION $0 $0 $0
S-072 GRADING/STOCKPILE RES. INFILL INSP $411 $434 ($23) S-073 STREET LIGHT PLAN REVIEW $24,792 $6,864 $17,928 S-074 IMPROVEMENT CONSTRUCTION PLAN CHECK $95,699 $58,385 $37,314 S-075 IMPROVEMENT CONSTRUCTION PLAN AMEND $0 $0 $0
S-076 IMPROVEMENT CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION $0 $0 $0
S-077 SUBDIVISION/IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT $19,620 $7,781 $11,839 S-078 PERFORMANCE BOND RELEASE $14,624 $7,751 $6,873
S-079 BOND RELEASE INSPECTION $0 $0 $0
S-080 MAINTENANCE BOND RELEASE $5,484 $2,907 $2,577
S-081 MAINTENANCE BOND INSPECTION $0 $0 $0
S-082 SUSPENSION OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT $0 $0 $0
S-083 APPEAL SUSPENSION OF IMPROVEMENT $0 $0 $0
S-084 STREET VACATION/OFFER OF DEDICATION $0 $0 $0
S-085 NON-STANDARD ENCROACH PERMIT APPL $14,192 $12,706 $1,486 S-086 EXIST RESID STANDARD ENCROACH PRMT $2,818 $2,179 $639 S-087 NON-STANDARD ENCROACH PLAN CHECK $225 $80 $145
S-088 NON-STANDARD ENCROACH INSPECTION $0 $0 $0
S-089 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE/CORRECT. $0 $0 $0
S-090 PUBLIC WORKS PERMIT ISSUANCE $11,697 $9,199 $2,498 S-091 WATER QUALITY MGMT PRELIM PLAN CHK $25,681 $44,756 ($19,075) S-092 WATER QUALITY MGMT FINAL PLAN CHECK $19,699 $4,411 $15,288 S-093 PRELIM HYDROLOGY/HYDRAULIC STUDY $39,549 $0 $39,549 S-094 FINAL HYDROLOGY/HYDRAULIC STUDY $39,549 $50,040 ($10,491) S-095 STORMWATER POLLUTION PROTECT REVIEW $0 $0 $0
S-096 STORMWATER POST-CONSTRUCT INSPECT $0 $0 $0
S-097 SEWER CONNECTION/LATERAL INSPECTION $0 $0 $0
S-098 LANDSCAPE PLAN CHECK $15,783 $9,866 $5,917
S-099 LANDSCAPE INSPECTION $0 $0 $0
S-100 TRAFFIC STUDY REVIEW $0 $0 $0
S-101 SCOPING AGREEMENT $0 $0 $0
S-102 TRANSPORTATION WIDE LOAD PERMIT $20 $16 $4
S-103 HAUL ROUTE REVIEW $245 $0 $245
S-104 DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING DEPOSIT SVC $626,879 $360,000 $266,879 S-105 ENGINEERING EXTRA PLAN CHECK $0 $0 $0
S-106 MISCELLANEOUS ENGINEERING SERVICES $0 $0 $0

SUBTOTAL - COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT $4,036,726 $3,804,984 $231,742 21 Page 756 of 1234

Pg. 22 CHAPTER III – REVENUES MATCHED AGAINST COSTS

Cost of Services Study for the City of Beaumont

TOTAL RESOURCES USED

SERVICE TO FINANCE SERVICE
REF# (1) FEE SERVICE (2) COST (3) FEES (4) TAXES (5)

PUBLIC SAFETY
S-107 CODE ENFORCEMENT INSPECTION $122 $0 $122
S-108 INSPECTION WARRANT $0 $0 $0
S-109 ABATEMENT WARRANT $0 $0 $0
S-110 CODE ENFORCEMENT CITATION HEARING $14,813 $0 $14,813 S-111 ABANDONED PROP. INIT. REGISTRATION $2,196 $0 $2,196 S-112 ABANDONED PROPERTY MONTHLY INSPECT. $732 $0 $732 S-113 WEED ABATEMENT $7,564 $3,875 $3,689
S-114 WEED ABATEMENT SUBSCRIPTION PROGRAM $14,396 $4,425 $9,971 S-115 FIRE PLAN CHECK/INSPECTION $396,626 $164,911 $231,715 S-116 STORED VEHICLE RELEASE $101,137 $43,125 $58,012 S-117 STORED VEHICLE RELEASE - DUI $7,269 $3,750 $3,519 S-118 VIN VERIFICATION $643 $165 $478
S-119 TRAFFIC CITATION SIGN OFF $166 $105 $61
S-120 POLICE ALARM LICENSE $41,850 $31,500 $10,350
S-121 AUTO REPOSSESSION PROCESSING $19 $0 $19
S-122 SECOND HAND DEALER LICENSE $1,634 $749 $885
S-123 FORTUNETELLER PERMIT $542 $240 $302
S-124 MASSAGE TECHNICIAN PERMIT - NEW $542 $100 $442
S-125 MASSAGE TECHNICIAN PERMIT - RENEWAL $44 $100 ($56) S-126 MASSAGE ESTABLISHMENT PERMIT $2,240 $1,010 $1,230 S-127 ADULT ORIENTED ESTABLISHMENT PERMIT $983 $424 $559 S-128 TOBACCO RETAILER PERMIT $983 $250 $733
S-129 GRAFFITI IMPLEMENTATION SALE PERMIT $141 $25 $116 S-130 TOW YARD INSPECTION $1,060 $429 $631
S-131 PEDDLER SOLICITOR PERMIT $2,704 $750 $1,954
S-132 BINGO PERMIT $926 $100 $826
S-133 RV PARKING PERMIT $88 $60 $28
S-134 GOLF CART PERMIT $1,733 $500 $1,233
S-135 CONCEALED WEAPON CARRY PERMIT $383 $100 $283
S-136 RECORDS CHECK/IMMIGRATION LETTER $496 $190 $306 S-137 FINGERPRINTING $35,111 $18,320 $16,791
S-138 BICYCLE REGISTRATION $26 $0 $26
S-139 CITATION PROCESSOR LATE FEE $34 $30 $4
S-140 POLICE REPORT COPY $672 $0 $672
S-141 POLICE ELECTRONIC FILE COPY $702 $168 $534
S-142 ANIMAL RELINQUISHMENT $3,551 $440 $3,111
S-143 ANIMAL IMPOUND/RETURN TO OWNER $3,891 $3,600 $291 S-144 DECEASED ANIMAL PICK UP $2,781 $1,272 $1,509
S-145 ANIMAL QUARANTINE $581 $120 $461
S-146 DANGEROUS ANIMAL REGISTRATION $661 $677 ($16)
S-147 ANIMAL TRAP RENTAL $1,194 $760 $434
S-148 DOG SILENCER RENTAL $166 $93 $73
S-149 KENNEL LICENSE $1,037 $668 $369
S-150 SENTRY KENNEL LICENSE $1,079 $910 $169
22 Page 757 of 1234

Pg. 23 CHAPTER III – REVENUES MATCHED AGAINST COSTS

Cost of Services Study for the City of Beaumont

TOTAL RESOURCES USED

SERVICE TO FINANCE SERVICE
REF# (1) FEE SERVICE (2) COST (3) FEES (4) TAXES (5)
S-151 MICROCHIP IDENTIFICATION DEVICE $3,644 $2,520 $1,124 S-152 ANIMAL CONTROL RESPONSE $202 $153 $49
S-153 ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES $425,234 $89,682 $335,552

SUBTOTAL - PUBLIC SAFETY $1,082,598 $376,296 $706,302

LEISURE & CULTURAL SERVICES
S-154 RECREATION PROGRAMS $816,542 $18,750 $797,792
S-155 FACILITY RENTALS $221,180 $128,520 $92,660
S-156 BALLFIELD RENTALS $617,369 $2,500 $614,869

SUBTOTAL - LEISURE & CULTURAL SERVICES $1,655,091 $149,770 $1,505,321

ENTERPRISE SERVICES
S-157 FATS, OILS OR GREASE INSPECTION $33,334 $0 $33,334 S-158 INDUSTRIAL WASTE INSPECTION $0 $0 $0
S-159 WASTEWATER SURVEY $11,400 $0 $11,400
S-160 SEWER FLOW MODELING $0 $0 $0
S-161 SEWAGE SPILL RESPONSE $0 $0 $0

SUBTOTAL - ENTERPRISE SERVICES $44,734 $0 ($44,734)

ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
S-162 NEW BUSINESS LICENSE PROCESSING $23,187 $9,145 $14,042 S-163 BUSINESS LICENSE RENEWAL PROCESSING $50,972 $19,455 $31,517 S-164 RELEASE OF LIEN $12,929 $17,850 ($4,921)
S-165 NON-UTILITY NSF CHECK/ACH PROCESS $35 $0 $35
S-166 UTILITY BILLING ACH RETURN PROCESS $11 $0 $11
S-167 CREDIT CARD PROCESSING $161,000 $39,316 $121,684 S-168 DOCUMENT REPRODUCTION $1 $1 $0
S-169 ELECTRONIC FILE REPRODUCTION $4 $7 ($3)
S-170 PUBLIC NOTARY $36 $15 $21

SUBTOTAL - ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES $248,175 $85,789 $162,386

GRAND TOTAL $7,067,324 $4,416,839 $2,650,485

Schedule 1 above shows that the City provides $7.1 million in fee services annually, and only recovers $4.4 million from fee revenues. Each year, an additional $2.65 million, coming from other funding sources, is needed to pay for these fee services. 23 Page 758 of 1234

Pg. 24 CHAPTER III – REVENUES MATCHED AGAINST COSTS

Cost of Services Study for the City of Beaumont
Policy Review Information
As the Council conducts its policy review of each of the revenue-cost match-ups in the next chapter, it should refer to comments on the bottom of the service center worksheets in Appendix B and also in the text in the next chapter to assist in that review.

The policy review should assess the tax revenues used to subsidize each service and address the following options available to the City for each service center:

1. Reduce costs and thereby the tax subsidy by reducing the level of service or restructuring the service to provide it differently.

2. Adjust or institute a fee or charge to recover all of the "costs reasonably borne".

3. Eliminate a tax subsidy to another "less deserving" service to utilize the taxes in order to provide this service.

Result of Acceptance of Fee Suggestions
If the suggestions in the following Chapter and on the Service Center Worksheets are adopted in full then a significant amount of added revenues will be available to the City, which would provide taxpayer equity. Most of these new revenues will be from fee increases to replace tax monies used to make up the difference between fees collected and costs incurred in providing the services, which will then be available for those services which can only be funded from taxes.

Policy Guidance. More importantly, the Council would be able to make its decisions based on business principles as much as is possible.

Understanding of Equitable Charging for Government. The City Council now has to assist its constituents to understand that under the California Constitution the intent is:
 That taxes finance those services for which there is no other alternative way to finance them.
 That service charges and special assessments should be utilized to finance those things for which benefits can be determined.
 That the beneficiaries of such services be charged in direct relationship to the benefits derived.

Then there no longer will be a feeling that the old definitional saw of "a good tax" being "the one which you pay and from which I get the benefits" exists in the City.

[T]he City provides
$7.1 million in fee
services, and only
recovers $4.4 million
from fee revenues.

Each year, an
additional $2.65
million, coming from
other funding
sources, is needed to
pay for these fee
services.
24 Page 759 of 1234

Pg. 25 CHAPTER IV – SERVICE REVENUE RECOMMENDATIONS

Cost of Services Study for the City of Beaumont
CHAPTER IV – SERVICE REVENUE

RECOMMENDATIONS
The purpose of this Chapter is to present the services which RCS has initially labeled as Personal Choice and to suggest the magnitude of tax revenues that could be diverted from these services to Community Supported Services.

City Council has Final Judgment. It must be understood that considerable judgment, albeit experienced, was exercised by RCS in suggesting what services were Personal Choice as opposed to Community Supported Services and in suggesting that most Personal Choice Services should be paid for by the service requestor rather than subsidized by the entire community. However, the final decision on the nature of the service and whether it deserves to be subsidized will have to be made by the City Council.

Service Groups
RCS has organized Personal Choice Services into the following service groups for purposes of discussion:

1. Community Development Services

2. Public Safety Services

3. Leisure & Cultural Services

4. Enterprise Services

5. Administrative Services

These groups, explained in turn, are program oriented. Each group includes a table summarizing the revenues and costs of each service. The table summarizing the group tables is found at the end of this Chapter.

Appendix A, following the text, summarizes the current fees and the proposed fees for each of the Personal Choice service centers

Service Center details found in Appendix B, are in sequence by the Reference Number (Column 1 on each of the following Tables), include detail information for each service on two facing pages.

The left page has textual and summary information including RCS’s suggested service fee. The right page has the service cost detail.

25 Page 760 of 1234

Pg. 26 CHAPTER IV – SERVICE REVENUE RECOMMENDATIONS

Cost of Services Study for the City of Beaumont
General Commentary on Chapter Tables
Each table has eight columns, explained here:
 Column 1 is the Report Reference Number.
 Column 2 is the title of the service.
 Columns 3, 4 & 5 are the same amounts for revenue, cost and profit (subsidy) found on the left page of the detail service sheets in Appendix B.
 Column 6 is the current percentage of costs recovered from the user fees and charges with the difference being subsidized by taxes.
 Column 7 is the percentage of user fee cost recovery which might be obtainable without tax subsidy. Of course, decisions regarding tax subsidies to a service are a City Council policy decision on how to allocate its tax and general revenues.  Column 8 contains the estimated amount of revenues which RCS suggests could be raised or reduced.

Special Circumstances
The table also footnotes which identify special circumstances for some fees. A service that is marked (a) is suggested to be removed from the City’s fee schedule for various reasons. When a service is marked (b), the fee is deposit based and financial estimations is not possible. For services marked (c), there is insufficient data to determine the financial impact. Services and services marked (d), is restricted by law, and cannot be adjusted for full cost recovery. For services marked (e), City staff recommends the service fee remaining subsidized.

26 Page 761 of 1234

Pg. 27 CHAPTER IV – SERVICE REVENUE RECOMMENDATIONS

Cost of Services Study for the City of Beaumont
Community Development Services
When basic City development services are supported by general taxes, there is little reason for taxes to also finance those Personal Choice services which mainly benefit a developer or specific property owner. Thus, the expenses distributed across these service centers are primarily the incremental additional expenses caused by community development. Were no development to take place, most of these costs could be eliminated, or at least significantly reduced.

TABLE 1 – COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES

TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL POSSIBLE

FEE SERVICE PROFIT/ NEW
REF # SERVICE REVENUE COST (SUBSIDY) ACTUAL SUGGEST REVENUE (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8)
S-001 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N/A N/A N/A N/A 100% $0 (b) S-002 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT $0 $2,713 ($2,713) 0.0% 100% $0 (a) S-003 FINDINGS OF PUBLIC CONV/NECESSITY $0 $2,006 ($2,006) 0.0% 100% $0 (a) S-004 CUP TIME EXTENSION $829 $1,968 ($1,139) 42.1% 100% $0 (a) S-005 LARGE GROUP HOME CUP $1,118 $3,729 ($2,611) 30.0% 100% $0 (a) S-006 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT N/A N/A N/A N/A 100% $0 (b) S-007 ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT CHANGE N/A N/A N/A N/A 100% $0 (b) S-008 SPECIFIC PLAN N/A N/A N/A N/A 100% $0 (b)
S-009 SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT N/A N/A N/A N/A 100% $0 (b) S-010 SPEC PLAN CONFORMITY DETERMINATION N/A N/A N/A N/A 100% $0 (b) S-011 ANNEXATION N/A N/A N/A N/A 100% $0 (b)
S-012 PLAN OF SERVICES N/A N/A N/A N/A 100% $0 (b)
S-013 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT N/A N/A N/A N/A 100% $0 (b) S-014 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT ANNUAL REVIEW $3,027 $2,165 $862 139.8% 100% $0 (a) S-015 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AMENDMENT N/A N/A N/A N/A 100% $0 (b) S-016 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT ASSIGNMENT N/A N/A N/A N/A 100% $0 (b) S-017 ESTOPPEL CERTIFICATE N/A N/A N/A N/A 100% $0 (b)
S-018 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW N/A N/A N/A N/A 100% $0 (b)
S-019 FACILITY FEE CREDIT AGREEMENT N/A N/A N/A N/A 100% $0 (b) S-020 DENSITY BONUS AGREEMENT N/A N/A N/A N/A 100% $0 (b) S-021 PRE-APPLICATION MEETING $23,606 $57,488 ($33,882)41.1% 100% $16,950 (d) S-022 ZONING MAP CHANGE N/A N/A N/A N/A 100% $0 (b)
S-023 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP N/A N/A N/A N/A 100% $0 (b)
S-024 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP N/A N/A N/A N/A 100% $0 (b)
S-025 TENTATIVE MAP TIME EXTENSION $847 $2,188 ($1,341)38.7% 100% $0 (a) S-026 CONDOMINIUM CONVERSION N/A N/A N/A N/A 100% $0 (b) S-027 VARIANCE $19,900 $33,266 ($13,366) 59.8% 100% $13,400 S-028 MINOR VARIANCE/MODIF OF STANDARDS $155 $246 ($91)63.0% 100% $0 (a) S-029 PLOT PLAN N/A N/A N/A N/A 100% $0 (b)
S-030 PLOT PLAN AMENDMENT N/A N/A N/A N/A 100% $0 (b)
S-031 PLOT PLAN TIME EXTENSION $565 $2,006 ($1,441) 28.2% 100% $0 (a) S-032 RESIDENTIAL ADMIN PLOT PLAN $10,845 $19,395 ($8,550) 55.9% 100% $8,600 S-033 NON-RESIDENTIAL ADMIN PLOT PLAN $29,954 $59,852 ($29,898) 50.0% 100% $29,900 S-034 MINOR PLOT PLAN - STAFF $9,759 $11,483 ($1,724) 85.0% 100% $1,700 S-035 MINOR PLOT PLAN - PLAN COMM $1,220 $3,230 ($2,010) 37.8% 100% $0 (a) S-036 PICK A LOT SITE PLAN REVIEW $103 $317 ($214) 32.5%100% $0 (a) S-037 MAP/PLOT PLAN CONFORMITY DETERMIN. N/A N/A N/A N/A 100% $0 (b) S-038 LANDSCAPE PLAN REVIEW $744 $857 ($113) 86.8% 100% $100 S-039 LANDSCAPE PLAN AMENDMENT $615 $857 ($242) 71.8% 100% $200 S-040 LANDSCAPE INSPECTION $82 $205 ($123) 40.0% 100% $100 PCT. RECOVERY

FROM FEES
27 Page 762 of 1234

Pg. 28 CHAPTER IV – SERVICE REVENUE RECOMMENDATIONS

Cost of Services Study for the City of Beaumont

TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL POSSIBLE

FEE SERVICE PROFIT/ NEW
REF # SERVICE REVENUE COST (SUBSIDY) ACTUAL SUGGEST REVENUE (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8)
S-041 SIGN PROGRAM $1,653 $1,872 ($219) 88.3% 100% $200 S-042 SIGN PROGRAM AMENDMENT $970 $1,872 ($902) 51.8% 100% $900 S-043 SIGN PERMIT $207 $376 ($169) 55.1% 100% $200
S-044 SIGN PERMIT PANEL CHANGE $83 $170 ($87) 48.8% 100% $100 S-045 TEMPORARY SIGN PERMIT $0 $170 ($170) 0.0% 100% $200 S-046 UNLICENSED GROUP HOME PERMIT $1,600 $6,671 ($5,071) 24.0% 100% $5,100 S-047 AUTOMOBILE FOR HIRE REVIEW $413 $2,718 ($2,305) 15.2% 100% $0 (a) S-048 HOME OCCUPATION PERMIT $77 $225 ($148) 34.2% 100% $100 S-049 MINOR SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT $1,162 $19,327 ($18,165) 6.0% 100% $18,200 S-050 MAJOR SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT $387 $10,392 ($10,005)3.7% 100% $10,000 S-051 MISCELLANEOUS SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT $77 $1,000 ($923) 7.7% 100% $900 S-052 APPEAL TO PLANNING COMISSION $642 $2,583 ($1,941)24.9% 100% $0 (a) S-053 APPEAL TO CITY COUNCIL $1,946 $2,986 ($1,040) 65.2% 100% $0 (a) S-054 PLANNING INFORMATION REQUEST $57 $225 ($168) 25.3%100% $0 (a) S-055 MISCELLANEOUS PLANNING REVIEW N/A N/A N/A N/A 100% $0 (b) S-056 COM DEV TECHNOLOGY SURCHARGE $169,000 $170,000 ($1,000) 99.4% 100% $0 S-057 BUILDING PLAN CHECK/INSPECTION $2,876,175 $2,549,034 $327,141 112.8% 100% $0 S-058 FINAL PARCEL MAP N/A N/A N/A N/A 100% $0 (b)
S-059 FINAL TRACT MAP N/A N/A N/A N/A 100% $0 (b)
S-060 TENTATIVE REVERSION TO ACREAGE N/A N/A N/A N/A 100%$0 (e) S-061 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT/PARCEL MERGER N/A N/A N/A N/A 100% $0 (b) S-062 FINAL MONUMENT SETTING N/A N/A N/A N/A 100% $0 (e) S-063 FINAL MONUMENT INSPECTION N/A N/A N/A N/A 100% $0 (b) S-064 PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN CHECK $0 $8,460 ($8,460)0.0% 100% $8,500 S-065 RESIDENTIAL GRADING PLAN CHECK $50,282 $68,439 ($18,157) 73.5% 100% $18,200 S-066 RES GRADING PLAN CHECK AMENDMENT N/A N/A N/A N/A 100% $0 (b) S-067 RES GRADING PLAN CHECK ADD'L REVIEW N/A N/A N/A N/A 100% $0 (b) S-068 COMMERCIAL GRADING PLAN CHECK $19,509 $29,268 ($9,759) 66.7% 100% $9,800 S-069 COMMERCIAL GRADING PLAN AMENDMENT N/A N/A N/A N/A 100% $0 (b) S-070 COMM GRADING PLAN CHECK ADD'L REV N/A N/A N/A N/A 100% $0 (b) S-071 GRADING/STOCKPILE INSPECTION N/A N/A N/A N/A 100% $0 (b) S-072 GRADING/STOCKPILE RES. INFILL INSP $434 $411 $23 105.6% 100% $0 S-073 STREET LIGHT PLAN REVIEW $6,864 $24,792 ($17,928)27.7% 100% $17,900 S-074 IMPROVEMENT CONSTRUCTION PLAN CHECK $58,385 $95,699 ($37,314) 61.0% 100% $37,300 S-075 IMPROVEMENT CONSTRUCTION PLAN AMEND N/A N/A N/A N/A 100% $0 (b) S-076 IMPROVEMENT CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION N/A N/A N/A N/A 100% $0 (b) S-077 SUBDIVISION/IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT $7,781 $19,620 ($11,839) 39.7% 100% $11,800 S-078 PERFORMANCE BOND RELEASE $7,751 $14,624 ($6,873) 53.0% 100% $6,900 S-079 BOND RELEASE INSPECTION N/A N/A N/A N/A 100% $0 (b) S-080 MAINTENANCE BOND RELEASE $2,907 $5,484 ($2,577) 53.0% 100% $2,600 S-081 MAINTENANCE BOND INSPECTION N/A N/A N/A N/A 100% $0 (b) S-082 SUSPENSION OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT N/A N/A N/A N/A 100% $0 (e) S-083 APPEAL SUSPENSION OF IMPROVEMENT N/A N/A N/A N/A 100% $0 (e) S-084 STREET VACATION/OFFER OF DEDICATION N/A N/A N/A N/A 100% $0 (b) S-085 NON-STANDARD ENCROACH PERMIT APPL $12,706 $14,192 ($1,486) 89.5% 100% $1,500 S-086 EXIST RESID STANDARD ENCROACH PRMT $2,179 $2,818 ($639) 77.3% 100% $600 S-087 NON-STANDARD ENCROACH PLAN CHECK $80 $225 ($145) 35.6% 100% $0 (b) S-088 NON-STANDARD ENCROACH INSPECTION N/A N/A N/A N/A 100% $0 (b) S-089 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE/CORRECT. N/A N/A N/A N/A 100% $0 (b) S-090 PUBLIC WORKS PERMIT ISSUANCE $9,199 $11,697 ($2,498) 78.6% 100% $2,500 S-091 WATER QUALITY MGMT PRELIM PLAN CHK $44,756 $25,681 $19,075 174.3% 100% ($19,100) S-092 WATER QUALITY MGMT FINAL PLAN CHECK $4,411 $19,699 ($15,288) 22.4% 100% $15,300 S-093 PRELIM HYDROLOGY/HYDRAULIC STUDY $0 $39,549 ($39,549) 0.0% 100% $39,500 S-094 FINAL HYDROLOGY/HYDRAULIC STUDY $50,040 $39,549 $10,491 126.5% 100% ($10,500) S-095 STORMWATER POLLUTION PROTECT REVIEW N/A N/A N/A N/A 100% $0 (e) PCT. RECOVERY

FROM FEES
28 Page 763 of 1234

Pg. 29 CHAPTER IV – SERVICE REVENUE RECOMMENDATIONS

Cost of Services Study for the City of Beaumont

Development services provided to individuals and businesses account for $3,804,984 in total service costs for the City. The City is able to recover 94.3% from the current fees, and RCS’ suggested fees will recover an additional $255,550 for the City.

TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL POSSIBLE

FEE SERVICE PROFIT/ NEW
REF # SERVICE REVENUE COST (SUBSIDY) ACTUAL SUGGEST REVENUE S-096 STORMWATER POST-CONSTRUCT INSPECT N/A N/A N/A N/A 100% $0 (b) S-097 SEWER CONNECTION/LATERAL INSPECTION N/A N/A N/A N/A 100% $0 (e) S-098 LANDSCAPE PLAN CHECK $9,866 $15,783 ($5,917) 62.5%100% $5,900 S-099 LANDSCAPE INSPECTION N/A N/A N/A N/A 100% $0 (b)
S-100 TRAFFIC STUDY REVIEW N/A N/A N/A N/A 100% $0 (b)
S-101 SCOPING AGREEMENT N/A N/A N/A N/A 100% $0 (b)
S-102 TRANSPORTATION WIDE LOAD PERMIT $16 $20 ($4) 80.0%80% $0 (c) S-103 HAUL ROUTE REVIEW $0 $245 ($245) 0.0% 100% $0 (a) S-104 DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING DEPOSIT SVC $360,000 $626,879 ($266,879) 57.4% 100% $0 S-105 ENGINEERING EXTRA PLAN CHECK N/A N/A N/A N/A 100% $0 (b) S-106 MISCELLANEOUS ENGINEERING SERVICES N/A N/A N/A N/A 100% $0 (b) COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT $3,804,984 $4,036,726 ($231,742) 94.3% $255,550 NOTES:
(a) Insufficient data to determine financial impact
(b) Deposit based service/fee
(c) Fee restricted by Law
(d) Fees are market sensitive
(e) Deletion of service/fee
PCT. RECOVERY

FROM FEES
29 Page 764 of 1234

Pg. 30 CHAPTER IV – SERVICE REVENUE RECOMMENDATIONS

Cost of Services Study for the City of Beaumont
Public Safety Services
While the majority of public safety services are tax-based programs such as patrol and investigation, the list below are user fee-based services provided to the public. These service centers are identified for those who use safety services disproportionately from others.

TABLE 2 – PUBLIC SAFETY SERVICES

TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL POSSIBLE

FEE SERVICE PROFIT/ NEW
REF # SERVICE REVENUE COST (SUBSIDY) ACTUAL SUGGEST REVENUE (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8)
S-107 CODE ENFORCEMENT INSPECTION $0 $122 ($122) 0.0% 100% $0 (a) S-108 INSPECTION WARRANT N/A N/A N/A N/A 100% $0 (b)
S-109 ABATEMENT WARRANT N/A N/A N/A N/A 100% $0 (b)
S-110 CODE ENFORCEMENT CITATION HEARING $0 $14,813 ($14,813) 0.0% 100% $0 (b) S-111 ABANDONED PROP. INIT. REGISTRATION $0 $2,196 ($2,196) 0.0% 100% $2,200 S-112 ABANDONED PROPERTY MONTHLY INSPECT. $0 $732 ($732) 0.0% 100% $700 S-113 WEED ABATEMENT $3,875 $7,564 ($3,689) 51.2% 100% $3,700 S-114 WEED ABATEMENT SUBSCRIPTION PROGRAM $4,425 $14,396 ($9,971) 30.7% 100% $10,000 S-115 FIRE PLAN CHECK/INSPECTION $164,911 $396,626 ($231,715) 41.6% 100% $115,850 S-116 STORED VEHICLE RELEASE $43,125 $101,137 ($58,012)42.6% 100% $58,000 S-117 STORED VEHICLE RELEASE - DUI $3,750 $7,269 ($3,519) 51.6% 100% $3,500 S-118 VIN VERIFICATION $165 $643 ($478) 25.7% 100% $500 S-119 TRAFFIC CITATION SIGN OFF $105 $166 ($61) 63.3% 100% $100 S-120 POLICE ALARM LICENSE $31,500 $41,850 ($10,350) 75.3% 100% $10,400 S-121 AUTO REPOSSESSION PROCESSING $0 $19 ($19) 0.0% 80% $0 (c) S-122 SECOND HAND DEALER LICENSE $749 $1,634 ($885) 45.8% 100% $900 S-123 FORTUNETELLER PERMIT $240 $542 ($302) 44.3% 100% $0 (a) S-124 MASSAGE TECHNICIAN PERMIT - NEW $100 $542 ($442) 18.5% 100% $0 (a) S-125 MASSAGE TECHNICIAN PERMIT - RENEWAL $100 $44 $56 227.3% 100% $0 (a) S-126 MASSAGE ESTABLISHMENT PERMIT $1,010 $2,240 ($1,230) 45.1% 100% $1,200 S-127 ADULT ORIENTED ESTABLISHMENT PERMIT $424 $983 ($559) 43.1% 100% $0 (a) S-128 TOBACCO RETAILER PERMIT $250 $983 ($733) 25.4% 100%$0 (a) S-129 GRAFFITI IMPLEMENTATION SALE PERMIT $25 $141 ($116) 17.7% 100% $0 (a) S-130 TOW YARD INSPECTION $429 $1,060 ($631) 40.5% 100% $600 S-131 PEDDLER SOLICITOR PERMIT $750 $2,704 ($1,954) 27.7% 100% $2,000 S-132 BINGO PERMIT $100 $926 ($826) 10.8% 10% $0 (c)
S-133 RV PARKING PERMIT $60 $88 ($28) 68.2% 100% $0
S-134 GOLF CART PERMIT $500 $1,733 ($1,233) 28.9% 100% $1,200 S-135 CONCEALED WEAPON CARRY PERMIT $100 $383 ($283) 26.1% 25% $0 (c) S-136 RECORDS CHECK/IMMIGRATION LETTER $190 $496 ($306)38.3% 100% $300 S-137 FINGERPRINTING $18,320 $35,111 ($16,791) 52.2% 100% $16,800 S-138 BICYCLE REGISTRATION $0 $26 ($26) 0.0% 15% $0 (c) S-139 CITATION PROCESSOR LATE FEE $30 $34 ($4) 88.2% 100%$0 S-140 POLICE REPORT COPY $0 $672 ($672) 0.0% 25% $0 (c) S-141 POLICE ELECTRONIC FILE COPY $168 $702 ($534) 23.9%25% $0 (c) S-142 ANIMAL RELINQUISHMENT $440 $3,551 ($3,111) 12.4% 100% $3,100 S-143 ANIMAL IMPOUND/RETURN TO OWNER $3,600 $3,891 ($291) 92.5% 100% $300 S-144 DECEASED ANIMAL PICK UP $1,272 $2,781 ($1,509) 45.7% 100% $1,500 S-145 ANIMAL QUARANTINE $120 $581 ($461) 20.7% 100% $500 S-146 DANGEROUS ANIMAL REGISTRATION $677 $661 $16 102.4%100% $0 S-147 ANIMAL TRAP RENTAL $760 $1,194 ($434) 63.7% 100% $400 S-148 DOG SILENCER RENTAL $93 $166 ($73) 56.0% 100% $0 (a) S-149 KENNEL LICENSE $668 $1,037 ($369) 64.4% 100% $0 (a) S-150 SENTRY KENNEL LICENSE $910 $1,079 ($169) 84.3% 100%$0 (a) PCT. RECOVERY

FROM FEES
30 Page 765 of 1234

Pg. 31 CHAPTER IV – SERVICE REVENUE RECOMMENDATIONS

Cost of Services Study for the City of Beaumont

Adopting RCS’s suggested fees would increase public safety cost recovery by $234,850 per year.

TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL POSSIBLE

FEE SERVICE PROFIT/ NEW
REF # SERVICE REVENUE COST (SUBSIDY) ACTUAL SUGGEST REVENUE (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8)
S-151 MICROCHIP IDENTIFICATION DEVICE $2,520 $3,644 ($1,124) 69.2% 100% $1,100 S-152 ANIMAL CONTROL RESPONSE $153 $202 ($49) 75.7% 100% $0 S-153 ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES $89,682 $425,234 ($335,552) 21.1% 100% $0 PUBLIC SAFETY $376,296 $1,082,598 ($706,302) 34.8% $234,850 NOTES:
(a) Insufficient data to determine financial impact
(b) Deposit based service/fee
(c) Fee restricted by Law
(d) Fees are market sensitive
(e) Deletion of service/fee
PCT. RECOVERY

FROM FEES
31 Page 766 of 1234

Pg. 32 CHAPTER IV – SERVICE REVENUE RECOMMENDATIONS

Cost of Services Study for the City of Beaumont
Leisure & Cultural Services

TABLE 3 – LEISURE & CULTURAL SERVICES

Conclusion of Leisure & Cultural Services. Leisure & Cultural Services include fees from the Community Services Department. As anticipated, the above findings suggest that a subsidy level exists for leisure & cultural activities. This report recommends that leisure and cultural service cost recovery goals be set as a percentage of their program costs. This practice is quite common in local government operations, not because indirect costs do not exist and are not important, but rather to ensure that the cost recovery goals remain relevant, market competitive, and are easily reproducible.

Social Policy. The City Council should develop a conscious policy as to what programs and service centers, and to what extent, should be subsidized with tax monies in promoting social benefit. It may well be that some level of subsidy for many of the services identified in this group is not only necessary, but also appropriate. If that is deemed to be the case, subsidy levels can be set as part of a budgetary or programmatic policy statement. These policy statements can also explicitly describe the social reasoning involved in the decision-making process.

TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL POSSIBLE

FEE SERVICE PROFIT/ NEW
REF # SERVICE REVENUE COST (SUBSIDY) ACTUAL SUGGEST REVENUE (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8)
S-154 RECREATION PROGRAMS $18,750 $816,542 ($797,792) 2.3% 2% $0 (d) S-155 FACILITY RENTALS $128,520 $221,180 ($92,660) 58.1%58% $0 (d) S-156 BALLFIELD RENTALS $2,500 $617,369 ($614,869) 0.4% 1% $0 (d) LEISURE & CULTURAL $149,770 $1,655,091 ($1,505,321) 9.0% $0 NOTES:
(a) Insufficient data to determine financial impact
(b) Deposit based service/fee
(c) Fee restricted by Law
(d) Fees are market sensitive
(e) Deletion of service/fee
PCT. RECOVERY

FROM FEES
32 Page 767 of 1234

Pg. 33 CHAPTER IV – SERVICE REVENUE RECOMMENDATIONS

Cost of Services Study for the City of Beaumont
Enterprise Services

Enterprise services represents the enterprise operations within the City, such as wastewater services.

TABLE 4 – ENTERPRISE SERVICES

With RCS’s suggested fee changes, the City will achieve $44,700 in additional cost recovery.

TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL POSSIBLE

FEE SERVICE PROFIT/ NEW
REF # SERVICE REVENUE COST (SUBSIDY) ACTUAL SUGGEST REVENUE (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8)
S-157 FATS, OILS OR GREASE INSPECTION $0 $33,334 ($33,334) 0.0% 100% $33,300 S-158 INDUSTRIAL WASTE INSPECTION N/A N/A N/A N/A 100% $0 (b) S-159 WASTEWATER SURVEY $0 $11,400 ($11,400) 0.0% 100% $11,400 S-160 SEWER FLOW MODELING N/A N/A N/A N/A 100% $0 (b)
S-161 SEWAGE SPILL RESPONSE N/A N/A N/A N/A 100% $0 (b) ENTERPRISE $0 $44,734 ($44,734) 0.0% $44,700
NOTES:
(a) Insufficient data to determine financial impact
(b) Deposit based service/fee
(c) Fee restricted by Law
(d) Fees are market sensitive
(e) Deletion of service/fee
PCT. RECOVERY

FROM FEES
33 Page 768 of 1234

Pg. 34 CHAPTER IV – SERVICE REVENUE RECOMMENDATIONS

Cost of Services Study for the City of Beaumont
Administrative Services
Miscellaneous administrative service centers fall into this group.

TABLE 5 – ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES

With RCS’s suggested fee changes, the City will achieve $167,200 in additional cost recovery, with most coming from a new credit card processing fee. Several administrative services are limited by State law.

TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL POSSIBLE

FEE SERVICE PROFIT/ NEW
REF # SERVICE REVENUE COST (SUBSIDY) ACTUAL SUGGEST REVENUE (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8)
S-162 NEW BUSINESS LICENSE PROCESSING $9,145 $23,187 ($14,042) 39.4% 100% $14,000 S-163 BUSINESS LICENSE RENEWAL PROCESSING $19,455 $50,972 ($31,517) 38.2% 100% $31,500 S-164 RELEASE OF LIEN $17,850 $12,929 $4,921 138.1% 100% $0 S-165 NON-UTILITY NSF CHECK/ACH PROCESS $0 $35 ($35) 0.0% 100% $0 S-166 UTILITY BILLING ACH RETURN PROCESS $0 $11 ($11) 0.0% 100% $0 S-167 CREDIT CARD PROCESSING $39,316 $161,000 ($121,684) 24.4% 100% $121,700 S-168 DOCUMENT REPRODUCTION $1 $1 $0 100.0% 100% $0 (c) S-169 ELECTRONIC FILE REPRODUCTION $7 $4 $3 175.0% 100% $0 (c) S-170 PUBLIC NOTARY $15 $36 ($21) 41.7% 50% $0 (c)
ADMINISTRATIVE $85,789 $248,175 ($162,386) 34.6% $167,200 NOTES:
(a) Insufficient data to determine financial impact
(b) Deposit based service/fee
(c) Fee restricted by Law
(d) Fees are market sensitive
(e) Deletion of service/fee
PCT. RECOVERY

FROM FEES
34 Page 769 of 1234

Pg. 35 CHAPTER IV – SERVICE REVENUE RECOMMENDATIONS

Cost of Services Study for the City of Beaumont
Summary of Personal Choice Services
The following Table summarizes the recommendations and suggestions made in this Chapter.

TABLE 6 – SUMMARY

If all the recommendations and suggestions made in this Chapter and in Appendix A are adopted, the City would raise $702,300 on an annual basis.

When calculating the possible new revenue, we want this number to be as realistic as possible.

Therefore, the Possible New Revenue is less than the Total Subsidies in the above schedule. This occurs for the following reasons:

Some services occur infrequently and so no revenue is projected. Other services are market sensitive, and therefore the fees and possible new revenues are projected to be less than the subsidies so that the fees fit into the market.

Taxpayer Equity Achieved. By taking such positive actions, the City’s financial picture would be improved, far more equity between taxpayers and fee-payers could be gained, and fairness between property-related and non-property-related services could be secured.

The above table shows that the City is subsidizing $2,650,485 of Personal Choice Services with City tax dollars. Should the City Council feel that tax dollars are insufficient, or use for different purposes, this chapter has shown that there are opportunities to either increase the user fees or lower the cost of Personal Choice Services.

A Master Fee Resolution
RCS recommends that the City adopt a Master Fee Resolution which the Finance Department updates and the City Council adopts annually. RCS will work with Finance to help implement this Resolution.

TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL POSSIBLE

FEE SERVICE PROFIT/ NEW

FROM FEES
35 Page 770 of 1234

Pg. 36 CHAPTER IV – SERVICE REVENUE RECOMMENDATIONS

Cost of Services Study for the City of Beaumont
Policy Regarding “New” Services
RCS also recommends that the City Council adopt a policy of not starting any new service without a cost analysis, using the costing approach utilized in this Report, so as to determine ways in which the service could be fee-financed, if at all possible. This approach could be used when considering new parks or public buildings, improved police protection, or any other desired function or service.

Available to answer questions
RCS is available to discuss the process and results with the City Council. In addition, we can share our experience of doing this for hundreds of cities as the City Council determines what action to take.

36 Page 771 of 1234

Pg. 37 CONCLUSION

Cost of Services Study for the City of Beaumont

CONCLUSION
Elimination of Subsidies
This Report highlights and recommends that most tax subsidies be eliminated as being unintentional. Service users thus can vote with their dollars and not use a service for which they are unwilling or unable to pay. Hidden subsidies, which have existed for many of the City’s supposedly self-financed and self-supporting services, can now be re-evaluated.

Issues Involved
The basic issue involved in viewing the results of the analysis presented by this text is to what degree fees should be expected to support the costs of the services.

Or viewed another way, to what extent should general taxes be utilized to subsidize the difference between the costs of each service center and the revenue produced from fees paid by the user of that service'?

Pressure on Tax Money Use. The opposite side of this issue is the increasing pressure on the use of public tax monies. Tax monies have severely decreased for local government in California. If fees do not pay all costs, then taxes must make up the differences not paid for by fees generated by users of specific services, or those services are threatened with extinction.

Addressing of Issues by City Council
The City Council should address the principles and issues enumerated herein to determine where, and to what extent, taxes will be utilized to cover costs incurred in the provision of special services. This is the current nature of competition between deserving public services for the scarce tax dollar. Who gets the dollars -- Police or Public Works? City streets or persons wanting zone changes? Code Enforcement or Animal Control? This is the nature of the tough policy questions involved in being an elected official in local government today.

Specific Policy Alternatives to Be Answered. Once the above cost issues are determined then the City Council has four clear policy alternatives available as to the revenue/cost mix of each service center:
 Continue any tax subsidy which might be found.
 Eliminate the tax subsidy by increasing fees to cover all "costs reasonably borne".  Reduce costs by reducing the level of service.
 Decide on an appropriate level of tax subsidy, being aware that taxes are now limited in rate, base and, consequently, in amounts yielded and available. 37 Page 772 of 1234

Pg. 38 CONCLUSION

Cost of Services Study for the City of Beaumont
Conclusion
The City has appropriately responded to the mandate and spirit of Proposition 4. It is utilizing the passage of Propositions 4, 13 and 218 and the attention given to them as an opportunity to review its financial structure and philosophy, and to institute a businesslike cost control system, tailored to the City's needs, to supplement its governmental accounting and budgeting systems.

The cooperation, excellent support and data provided in accomplishment of the work reported herein speaks well of the way in which a City organization can adapt to the so-called "new realities" of California governmental finance.

38 Page 773 of 1234

APPENDIX A – SUMMARY OF CURRENT FEES AND PROPOSED FEES

39 Page 774 of 1234

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

FEE COMPARISON REPORT
S-001 CONDITIONAL USE PERMITREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$5,000 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs.

Stand-alone - $2,038.94 deposit
S-002 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENTREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$2,715 per applicationNone
S-003 FINDINGS OF PUBLIC CONV/NECESSITYREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$2,005 per applicationNone
S-004 CUP TIME EXTENSIONREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$1,970 per application$829.42 per application
S-005 LARGE GROUP HOME CUPREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$3,730 per application$1,117.60 per application
S-006 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENTREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Up to 50 acres - $5,000 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs.

Over 50 acres - $7,500 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs.

Up to 50 acres - $3,368 deposit
Over 50 acres - $5,563 deposit
September 5, 2022
1 40 Page 775 of 1234

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

FEE COMPARISON REPORT
S-007 ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT CHANGEREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$5,000 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs.
$4,324 deposit
S-008 SPECIFIC PLANREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$15,000 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs.
$11,081 deposit
S-009 SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENTREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$7,500 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs.
$2,686 deposit
S-010 SPEC PLAN CONFORMITY DETERMINATIONREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$5,000 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs.
$2,354 deposit
S-011 ANNEXATIONREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$25,000 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside or LAFCo costs. $48,235 deposit plus actual costs for LAFCo
S-012 PLAN OF SERVICESREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$5,000 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs.
$3,584 deposit
September 5, 2022
2 41 Page 776 of 1234

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

FEE COMPARISON REPORT
S-013 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$25,000 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs.
$42,426 deposit
S-014 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT ANNUAL REVIEWREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$2,165 per review$3,027.43 per review
S-015 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AMENDMENTREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$10,000 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs.
$41,231 deposit
S-016 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT ASSIGNMENTREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$5,000 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs.
$3,521.16 per application
S-017 ESTOPPEL CERTIFICATEREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$5,000 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs.
$3,521.16 per application
S-018 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEWREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Actual consultant cost plus 20% Administrative fee
Filing Fees - Actual costs
Actual consultant cost plus 20% Administrative fee
Filing Fees - Actual costs
September 5, 2022
3 42 Page 777 of 1234

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

FEE COMPARISON REPORT
S-019 FACILITY FEE CREDIT AGREEMENTREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$10,000 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs.
$9,797 deposit
S-020 DENSITY BONUS AGREEMENTREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$5,000 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs.
$2,994.38 per application
S-021 PRE-APPLICATION MEETINGREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$2,210 per meeting/review
50% credit on the first meeting's fee if the project is submitted within six months.
$907.92 per meeting/review
S-022 ZONING MAP CHANGEREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$5,000 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs.
$4,324 deposit
S-023 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAPREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$5,000 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs.
$1,723 deposit
S-024 TENTATIVE TRACT MAPREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$7,500 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs.
$4,390 deposit
September 5, 2022
4 43 Page 778 of 1234

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

FEE COMPARISON REPORT
S-025 TENTATIVE MAP TIME EXTENSIONREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$2,190 per application$846.98 per application
S-026 CONDOMINIUM CONVERSIONREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$10,000 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs.
$10,548 deposit
S-027 VARIANCEREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$2,560 per application$1,530.76 per application
S-028 MINOR VARIANCE/MODIF OF STANDARDSREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$245 per application$154.94 per application
S-029 PLOT PLANREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$5,000 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs.
$3,778 deposit
S-030 PLOT PLAN AMENDMENTREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$3,000 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs.
$2,148 deposit
September 5, 2022
5 44 Page 779 of 1234

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

FEE COMPARISON REPORT
S-031 PLOT PLAN TIME EXTENSIONREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$2,005 per application$565 per application
S-032 RESIDENTIAL ADMIN PLOT PLANREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$925 per application$516.45 per application
S-033 NON-RESIDENTIAL ADMIN PLOT PLANREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$1,030 per application$516.45 per application
S-034 MINOR PLOT PLAN - STAFFREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$1,435 per application$1,219.85 per application
S-035 MINOR PLOT PLAN - PLAN COMMREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$3,230 per application$1,219.85 per application
S-036 PICK A LOT SITE PLAN REVIEWREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$315 per lot$103.29 per lot
September 5, 2022
6 45 Page 780 of 1234

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

FEE COMPARISON REPORT
S-037 MAP/PLOT PLAN CONFORMITY DETERMIN.REF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$2,500 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs.
$984 deposit
S-038 LANDSCAPE PLAN REVIEWREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$20 per application plus $140 per sheet$743.69 per application S-039 LANDSCAPE PLAN AMENDMENTREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$20 per application plus $140 per sheet
Cost is based on six sheets
$614.58 per application
S-040 LANDSCAPE INSPECTIONREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$205 per lot$81.60 per lot
S-041 SIGN PROGRAMREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$1,870 per application$1,652.64 per application
S-042 SIGN PROGRAM AMENDMENTREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$1,870 per application$969.89 per application
September 5, 2022
7 46 Page 781 of 1234

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

FEE COMPARISON REPORT
S-043 SIGN PERMITREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$375 per application$206.58 per application
S-044 SIGN PERMIT PANEL CHANGEREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$170 per application$82.63 per application
S-045 TEMPORARY SIGN PERMITREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$170 per applicationNone
S-046 UNLICENSED GROUP HOME PERMITREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$3,335 per application$800 per application
S-047 AUTOMOBILE FOR HIRE REVIEWREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$2,720 per application$413.16 per application
S-048 HOME OCCUPATION PERMITREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$225 per application$77.47 per application
September 5, 2022
8 47 Page 782 of 1234

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

FEE COMPARISON REPORT
S-049 MINOR SPECIAL EVENT PERMITREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$1,290 per application$77.47 per application
S-050 MAJOR SPECIAL EVENT PERMITREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$1,985 per application
Carnival/Circus/Menagerie - additional $455 per application Events of more than 1,000 people - $5,000 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all staff involved plus any outside costs.
$77.47 per application
S-051 MISCELLANEOUS SPECIAL EVENT PERMITREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$1,000 per application$77.47 per application
S-052 APPEAL TO PLANNING COMISSIONREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$2,585 per appeal$642.46 per appeal
S-053 APPEAL TO CITY COUNCILREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$2,985 per appeal$1,945.98 per appeal
S-054 PLANNING INFORMATION REQUESTREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$225 per letter
Plus a deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved for additional research.
$56.81 per letter
September 5, 2022
9 48 Page 783 of 1234

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

FEE COMPARISON REPORT
S-055 MISCELLANEOUS PLANNING REVIEWREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs. $1,195 deposit
Planning Commission Hearing required by any action - $786.04 S-056 COM DEV TECHNOLOGY SURCHARGEREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE

3.29% Of Building, Planning, and Engineering fees3.29% Of Building, Planning, and Engineering fees S-057 BUILDING PLAN CHECK/INSPECTIONREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
See Appendix C for detailSee Appendix C for detail
S-058 FINAL PARCEL MAPREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$5,000 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs.
$2,500 deposit
S-059 FINAL TRACT MAPREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$7,500 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs.
$4,000 deposit
S-060 TENTATIVE REVERSION TO ACREAGEREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
This fee should be removed as the service is no longer provided.$1,000 deposit September 5, 2022
10 49 Page 784 of 1234

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

FEE COMPARISON REPORT
S-061 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT/PARCEL MERGERREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$1,200 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs.
$1,200 deposit with charges at contract cost plus 20% for administration
S-062 FINAL MONUMENT SETTINGREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
This fee should be removed from the fee schedule as the service is no longer provided.

First four parcels/lots
- $2,582.25 plus $258.23 per
each additional parcel/lot
S-063 FINAL MONUMENT INSPECTIONREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$1,500 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs.

First four parcels/lots
- $1,032.90 plus $25.82 per
each additional parcel/lot
S-064 PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN CHECKREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$565 per planNone
S-065 RESIDENTIAL GRADING PLAN CHECKREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$95 per plan plus $750 per sheetGrading/Stockpile - $620.77 per sheet Wall/Fence - $273.72 per sheet
Parking Lot Plan Check and Inspection - $258.23 per sheet Erosion Control - $1,000 deposit
S-066 RES GRADING PLAN CHECK AMENDMENTREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$3,000 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs.
$2,500 deposit
September 5, 2022
11 50 Page 785 of 1234

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

FEE COMPARISON REPORT
S-067 RES GRADING PLAN CHECK ADD'L REVIEWREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$1,000 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs.
$1,000 deposit with charges at contract cost plus 20% for administration
S-068 COMMERCIAL GRADING PLAN CHECKREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$95 per plan plus $1,125 per sheetGrading/Stockpile - $812.89 per sheet Wall/Fence - $273.72 per sheet
Parking Lot Plan Check and Inspection - $258.23 per sheet Erosion Control - $1,000 deposit
S-069 COMMERCIAL GRADING PLAN AMENDMENTREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$3,000 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs.
$2,500 deposit
S-070 COMM GRADING PLAN CHECK ADD'L REVREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs.
2,000-10,000 CY - $1,735.27 plus $433.82 each additional 1,000 cubic Yards or fraction thereof up to 10,000 cubic yards 10,001-100,000 CY - $3,904.36 plus $63.01 each additional 1,000 cubic Yards or fraction thereof up to 100,000 cubic yards 100,001-200,000 CY - $10,845.45 plus $108.45 each additional 1,000 cubic Yards or fraction thereof up to 200,000 cubic yards 200,001+ CY - $25,000 deposit
Clear & Grub - $5,000 plus $500 per acre over 10 acres deposit September 5, 2022
12 51 Page 786 of 1234

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

FEE COMPARISON REPORT
S-072 GRADING/STOCKPILE RES. INFILL INSPREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$435 per permit$433.82 per application
S-073 STREET LIGHT PLAN REVIEWREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$95 per plan plus $655 per sheet$623.87 per plan
S-074 IMPROVEMENT CONSTRUCTION PLAN CHECKREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$95 per plan plus $1,030 per sheet$686.88 per sheet
S-075 IMPROVEMENT CONSTRUCTION PLAN AMENDREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$1,500 deposit with charges at contract cost plus 20% for administration
$2,500 deposit
S-076 IMPROVEMENT CONSTRUCTION INSPECTIONREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Deposit based on the Engineers Estimate
(Minimum $750)
Deposit based on the Engineers Estimate
(Minimum $750)
Street Light Inspection - $78.50 per light
S-077 SUBDIVISION/IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENTREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$725 per agreement plus actual costs for legal services$288.18 per agreement September 5, 2022
13 52 Page 787 of 1234

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

FEE COMPARISON REPORT
S-078 PERFORMANCE BOND RELEASEREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$915 per application$484.43 per application
S-079 BOND RELEASE INSPECTIONREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$3,000 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs.
$3,000 deposit
S-080 MAINTENANCE BOND RELEASEREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$915 per application$484.43 per application
S-081 MAINTENANCE BOND INSPECTIONREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$3,000 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs.
$3,000 deposit
S-082 SUSPENSION OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENTREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
This fee should be removed as the service is no longer provided.$1,000 deposit S-083 APPEAL SUSPENSION OF IMPROVEMENTREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
This fee should be removed as the service is no longer provided.$1,000 deposit September 5, 2022
14 53 Page 788 of 1234

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

FEE COMPARISON REPORT
S-084 STREET VACATION/OFFER OF DEDICATIONREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$2,000 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs.
$1,200 deposit with charges at contract cost plus 20% for administration
S-085 NON-STANDARD ENCROACH PERMIT APPLREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$60 per application$51.65 per application
S-086 EXIST RESID STANDARD ENCROACH PRMTREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$280 per permit$217.94 per permit
S-087 NON-STANDARD ENCROACH PLAN CHECKREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$40 per plan plus charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs.

Actual Cost
S-088 NON-STANDARD ENCROACH INSPECTIONREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs.
$500 deposit
S-089 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE/CORRECT.REF #:TITLE:

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

FEE COMPARISON REPORT
S-090 PUBLIC WORKS PERMIT ISSUANCEREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Within One Year - $95
After One Year - $1,000 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs.

Within One Year - $75.40
After One Year - $500 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs.

S-091 WATER QUALITY MGMT PRELIM PLAN CHKREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
0-10 acres - $2,345 per plan
Above 10 acres - $3,465 per plan
0-10 acres - $4,211.13 per plan
Above 10 acres - $5,533.25 per plan
S-092 WATER QUALITY MGMT FINAL PLAN CHECKREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
0-10 acres - $1,855 per plan
Above 10 acres - $2,420 per plan
$441.05 per plan
S-093 PRELIM HYDROLOGY/HYDRAULIC STUDYREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
0-10 acres - $2,345 per study
10-50 acres - $3.095 per study
50-100 acres - $3,840 per study
100+ acres - $4,590 per study
None
S-094 FINAL HYDROLOGY/HYDRAULIC STUDYREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
0-10 acres - $2,345 per study
10-50 acres - $3,095 per study
50-100 acres - $3,840 per study
100+ acres - $4,590 per study
0-10 acres - $2,889.02 per study
10-50 acres - $4,211.13 per study
50-100 acres - $5,533.25 per study
100+ acres - $8,177.47 per study
September 5, 2022
16 55 Page 790 of 1234

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

FEE COMPARISON REPORT
S-095 STORMWATER POLLUTION PROTECT REVIEWREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
This fee should be removed from the fee schedule as the service is provided by the State.

Plan Check:
0-10 acres - $4,211.13 per plan
Above 10 acres - $5,533.25 per plan
S-096 STORMWATER POST-CONSTRUCT INSPECTREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs.

None
S-097 SEWER CONNECTION/LATERAL INSPECTIONREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
This fee should be removed as the service cost is already covered as part an encroachment permit.
$75 per inspection
Special Construction or Construction under unusual conditions - $65 per hour ($75 minimum)
S-098 LANDSCAPE PLAN CHECKREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$95 per plan plus $560 per sheet$411.09 per sheet
S-099 LANDSCAPE INSPECTIONREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Deposit of 50% of Engineers Estimate ($500 minimum)Deposit of 50% of Engineers Estimate ($500 minimum) S-100 TRAFFIC STUDY REVIEWREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$2,000 deposit with charges at contract cost plus 20% for administration
$1,000 deposit with charges at contract cost plus 20% for administration
September 5, 2022
17 56 Page 791 of 1234

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

FEE COMPARISON REPORT
S-101 SCOPING AGREEMENTREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$750 deposit with charges at contract cost plus 20% for administration
None
S-102 TRANSPORTATION WIDE LOAD PERMITREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Fees are set by the State:

Single - $16 per permit
Annual - $90 per permit
Fees are set by the State:

Single - $16 per permit
Annual - $90 per permit
S-103 HAUL ROUTE REVIEWREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$245 per applicationNone
S-104 DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING DEPOSIT SVCREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
These fees are detailed in the various services with a deposit-based fee
These fees are detailed in the various services with a deposit-based fee
S-105 ENGINEERING EXTRA PLAN CHECKREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Charges at contract cost plus 20% for administrationCharges at contract cost plus 20% for administration S-106 MISCELLANEOUS ENGINEERING SERVICESREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs plus 20% for administration.

Actual Cost
September 5, 2022
18 57 Page 792 of 1234

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

FEE COMPARISON REPORT
S-107 CODE ENFORCEMENT INSPECTIONREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$120 per hourNone
S-108 INSPECTION WARRANTREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Charge the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs.

None
S-109 ABATEMENT WARRANTREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Charge the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs.

None
S-110 CODE ENFORCEMENT CITATION HEARINGREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$500 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs.

None
S-111 ABANDONED PROP. INIT. REGISTRATIONREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$185 per propertyNone
S-112 ABANDONED PROPERTY MONTHLY INSPECT.REF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$60 per monthNone
September 5, 2022
19 58 Page 793 of 1234

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

FEE COMPARISON REPORT
S-113 WEED ABATEMENTREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$245 plus actual cost of abatement$125 plus actual cost of abatement S-114 WEED ABATEMENT SUBSCRIPTION PROGRAMREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$245 or 20% of abatement cost, whichever is less, plus actual cost of abatement
$75 plus actual cost of abatement
S-115 FIRE PLAN CHECK/INSPECTIONREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
See Appendix D for detailSee Appendix D for detail
S-116 STORED VEHICLE RELEASEREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$175 per release$75 per release
S-117 STORED VEHICLE RELEASE - DUIREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$290 per release$150 per release
S-118 VIN VERIFICATIONREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$60 per vehicle$15 per vehicle
September 5, 2022
20 59 Page 794 of 1234

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

FEE COMPARISON REPORT
S-119 TRAFFIC CITATION SIGN OFFREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$25 per citation$15 per citation
S-120 POLICE ALARM LICENSEREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$28 per license$21 per license
S-121 AUTO REPOSSESSION PROCESSINGREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Fee is set by State law:
$15 per vehicle
None
S-122 SECOND HAND DEALER LICENSEREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$235 per application$107 per application
S-123 FORTUNETELLER PERMITREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$540 per application per year$240 per application per year S-124 MASSAGE TECHNICIAN PERMIT - NEWREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$540 per application$100 per application
September 5, 2022
21 60 Page 795 of 1234

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

FEE COMPARISON REPORT
S-125 MASSAGE TECHNICIAN PERMIT - RENEWALREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$45 per renewal$100 per renewal
S-126 MASSAGE ESTABLISHMENT PERMITREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$225 per application, annually$101 per application, annually S-127 ADULT ORIENTED ESTABLISHMENT PERMITREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$985 per application, annually$424 per application, annually S-128 TOBACCO RETAILER PERMITREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$985 per application$250 per application
S-129 GRAFFITI IMPLEMENTATION SALE PERMITREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$140 per application$25 per application
S-130 TOW YARD INSPECTIONREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$355 per inspection$143 per inspection
September 5, 2022
22 61 Page 796 of 1234

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

FEE COMPARISON REPORT
S-131 PEDDLER SOLICITOR PERMITREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$180 per person, annually$50 per person, annually
S-132 BINGO PERMITREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Remote Caller Game - $465 per permit
Other - $50 per application (limited by State law)
$50 per application
S-133 RV PARKING PERMITREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$7.50 per permit$5 per permit
S-134 GOLF CART PERMITREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$175 per application, annually$50 per application, annually S-135 CONCEALED WEAPON CARRY PERMITREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Fee is set by State Law:

New application - $100 $25 - renewal application
Amended application - $10
Psychological testing costs are to be added to the above fee up to $150
20% of the fee is collected upon filing of the initial application and is and is non-refundable. The balance of the fee is collected on issuance of the license.
$100 per application
S-136 RECORDS CHECK/IMMIGRATION LETTERREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$25 per check$10 per check
September 5, 2022
23 62 Page 797 of 1234

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

FEE COMPARISON REPORT
S-137 FINGERPRINTINGREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Resident - $25
Non-Resident - $35
Resident - $15
Non-Resident - $25
S-138 BICYCLE REGISTRATIONREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Per State Vehicle Code, Section 39004:

New - $4
Transfer - $2
Replacement - $2
Renewal - $2
None
S-139 CITATION PROCESSOR LATE FEEREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$35 per citation$30 per citation
S-140 POLICE REPORT COPYREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Black & White - $0.35 per copy
Color - $0.45 per copy
Black & White - $0.35 per copy
Color - $0.45 per copy
S-141 POLICE ELECTRONIC FILE COPYREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$7 per device$7 per device
September 5, 2022
24 63 Page 798 of 1234

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

FEE COMPARISON REPORT
S-142 ANIMAL RELINQUISHMENTREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Beaumont:

Pick up - $135
Bring In - $115
Calimesa:

Pick up - $135
Bring In - $115
Shelter Cost - $81
Pick up - $20
Bring in - $10
Shelter Cost - $81
S-143 ANIMAL IMPOUND/RETURN TO OWNERREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Beaumont - $50
Calimesa - $80
Beaumont - $50
Calimesa - $80
S-144 DECEASED ANIMAL PICK UPREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Beaumont - $140
Calimesa - $140
Beaumont - $40
Calimesa - $132
S-145 ANIMAL QUARANTINEREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Beaumont - $175 per animal plus $50 per day
Calimesa - $175 per animal plus $50 per day
$40 per animal plus $15 per day
S-146 DANGEROUS ANIMAL REGISTRATIONREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$220 per animalBeaumont - $208
Calimesa - $263
September 5, 2022
25 64 Page 799 of 1234

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

FEE COMPARISON REPORT
S-147 ANIMAL TRAP RENTALREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Beaumont - $60 per trap plus $10 per day after the fifth day Calimesa - $97 per trap plus $12 per day after the fifth day Plus deposit based on replacement cost of trap
Beaumont - $25 per trap plus $10 per day after the fifth day Calimesa - $97 per trap plus $12 per day after the fifth day Small Trap Replacement:

Beaumont - $149
Calimesa - $157
Large Trap Replacement:

Beaumont - $299
Calimesa - $307
S-148 DOG SILENCER RENTALREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Beaumont - $60
Calimesa - $73
Plus deposit based on replacement cost of trap
Beaumont - $20
Calimesa - $73
Replacement:

Beaumont - $154
Calimesa - $162
S-149 KENNEL LICENSEREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Beaumont:
1 year - $300
2 year - $425
Calimesa:
1 year - $300
Late Fee Penalty - 50% of License Fee
Beaumont:
1 year - $291
2 year - $377
Late Fee Penalty - 50% of License Fee
S-150 SENTRY KENNEL LICENSEREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Beaumont:
1 year - $365
2 year - $715
Late Fee Penalty - 50% of License Fee
Beaumont:
1 year - $338
2 year - $572
Late Fee Penalty - 50% of License Fee
September 5, 2022
26 65 Page 800 of 1234

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

FEE COMPARISON REPORT
S-151 MICROCHIP IDENTIFICATION DEVICEREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Beaumont - $35
Calimesa - $35
$28 per device
S-152 ANIMAL CONTROL RESPONSEREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Beaumont - $75
Calimesa - $94
Beaumont - $59
Calimesa - $94
S-153 ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICESREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
See Appendix E for detailSee Appendix E for detail
S-154 RECREATION PROGRAMSREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
See Appendix F for detailVarious fees
S-155 FACILITY RENTALSREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
See Appendix F for detailVarious fees
S-156 BALLFIELD RENTALSREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
See Appendix F for detailVarious fees
September 5, 2022
27 66 Page 801 of 1234

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

FEE COMPARISON REPORT
S-157 FATS, OILS OR GREASE INSPECTIONREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
General Facility - $205 per first inspection
Dental Facility - $205 per first inspection plus $40 for Amalgam use Reinspection - $95
None
S-158 INDUSTRIAL WASTE INSPECTIONREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs.

Actual costs
S-159 WASTEWATER SURVEYREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$30 per review$25.82 per review (not currently charging) S-160 SEWER FLOW MODELINGREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs.

Actual cost plus 20% for administration
S-161 SEWAGE SPILL RESPONSEREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs.

Actual cost plus 20% for administration
S-162 NEW BUSINESS LICENSE PROCESSINGREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$80 per application$31 per application
On-Line - $15 per application
September 5, 2022
28 67 Page 802 of 1234

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

FEE COMPARISON REPORT
S-163 BUSINESS LICENSE RENEWAL PROCESSINGREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$40 per renewal$15 per renewal
On-Line - $5 per renewal
S-164 RELEASE OF LIENREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$50 per lien plus County fees$51 per lien
S-165 NON-UTILITY NSF CHECK/ACH PROCESSREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$35 per NSF check/ACHNone
S-166 UTILITY BILLING ACH RETURN PROCESSREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$10 per ACH returnNone
S-167 CREDIT CARD PROCESSINGREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
2% of the amount chargedFees calculated based on the amount charged and the actual merchant rates
S-168 DOCUMENT REPRODUCTIONREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Black & White - $0.35 per copy
Color - $0.45 per copy
Larger than 11 x 17 - Actual Costs
Black & White - $0.35 per copy
Color - $0.45 per copy
Larger than 11 x 17 - $10
September 5, 2022
29 68 Page 803 of 1234

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

FEE COMPARISON REPORT
S-169 ELECTRONIC FILE REPRODUCTIONREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$7 per deviceReproduction - $7 per disc
Scan of documents to disc - $0.25 per page
Scan of documents larger than 11 x 17 to disc - $7 per page Electronically transmitted documents - $0.20 per image
Photographs from Development Center - Actual Costs
S-170 PUBLIC NOTARYREF #:TITLE:

CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$15 per signature (fee is set by the State)$15 per signature (fee is set by the State) September 5, 2022
30 69 Page 804 of 1234

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK
70 Page 805 of 1234

APPENDIX B - SUMMARY WORKSHEETS MATCHED WITH COST DETAIL

WORKSHEETS

71 Page 806 of 1234

S-001CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT

APPLICATIONPLANNING
Review of a request for a new use for a particular site which is allowable with a Conditional Use Permit usually with conditions placed on the approval.

Stand-alone - $2,038.94 deposit
$5,000 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs. 100%
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
6 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
$0
$0
$0
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
72 Page 807 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT S-001
6 REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST

0.00 $0.00 0 $0
$0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$0 0.00TOTALS $0.00
73 Page 808 of 1234

S-002CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT

APPLICATIONPLANNING
Review of a proposed amendment to an approved Conditional Use Permit for compliance with City codes and standards.

None
$2,715 per application
100%
$0.00
$2,713.00
$(2,713.00)
1 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
$(2,713)
$2,713
$0
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
74 Page 809 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT S-002
1 REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST ADMIN CUST SVCS COORD I/II 0.25 $19.65 1 $20 PUBLIC WORKS ASST DIR/PRIN/SR ENGINEER 1.00 $187.30 1 $187 PUBLIC WORKS PW DIR/CITY ENGINEER 0.50 $147.20 1 $147 PLANNING COMM DEV DIR/DEPUTY CM 1.75 $541.33 1 $541 PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER 7.00 $1,817.48 1 $1,817 $2,713 $2,712.96 10.50TYPE SUBTOTAL
$2,713 10.50TOTALS $2,713.00
75 Page 810 of 1234

S-003FINDINGS OF PUBLIC CONV/NECESSITY

APPLICATIONPLANNING
Review of a request for a public convenience to serve alcohol on a temporary basis for compliance with City codes and standards.

None
$2,005 per application
100%
$0.00
$2,006.00
$(2,006.00)
1 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
$(2,006)
$2,006
$0
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
76 Page 811 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
FINDINGS OF PUBLIC CONV/NECESSITY S-003
1 REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST ADMIN CUST SVCS COORD I/II 0.25 $19.65 1 $20 PLANNING ASST/ASSOC PLANNER 2.00 $301.42 1 $301 PLANNING COMM DEV DIR/DEPUTY CM 1.25 $386.66 1 $387 PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER 5.00 $1,298.20 1 $1,298 $2,006 $2,005.93 8.50TYPE SUBTOTAL
$2,006 8.50TOTALS $2,006.00
77 Page 812 of 1234

S-004CUP TIME EXTENSION

APPLICATIONPLANNING
Review of a proposed time extension to an approved CUP that will expire in compliance with City codes and standards.
$829.42 per application
$1,970 per application
100%
$829.00
$1,968.00
$(1,139.00)
1 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 42.12%
$(1,139)
$1,968
$829
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
78 Page 813 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
CUP TIME EXTENSION S-004
1 REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST ADMIN CUST SVCS COORD I/II 0.25 $19.65 1 $20 PLANNING ASST/ASSOC PLANNER 1.75 $263.74 1 $264 PLANNING COMM DEV DIR/DEPUTY CM 1.25 $386.66 1 $387 PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER 5.00 $1,298.20 1 $1,298 $1,968 $1,968.25 8.25TYPE SUBTOTAL
$1,968 8.25TOTALS $1,968.00
79 Page 814 of 1234

S-005LARGE GROUP HOME CUP

APPLICATIONPLANNING
Review of a request for a Group Home for compliance with City codes and standards. $1,117.60 per application
$3,730 per application
100%
$1,118.00
$3,729.00
$(2,611.00)
1 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 29.98%
$(2,611)
$3,729
$1,118
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
80 Page 815 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
LARGE GROUP HOME CUP S-005
1 REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST ADMIN CUST SVCS COORD I/II 0.25 $19.65 1 $20 PUBLIC WORKS ASST DIR/PRIN/SR ENGINEER 2.00 $374.60 1 $375 PUBLIC WORKS PW DIR/CITY ENGINEER 0.50 $147.20 1 $147 PLANNING ASST/ASSOC PLANNER 2.75 $414.45 1 $414 PLANNING COMM DEV DIR/DEPUTY CM 2.25 $695.99 1 $696 PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER 8.00 $2,077.12 1 $2,077 $3,729 $3,729.01 15.75TYPE SUBTOTAL
$3,729 15.75TOTALS $3,729.00
81 Page 816 of 1234

S-006GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT

APPLICATIONPLANNING
Review of a request to amend the General Plan in compliance with City codes and standards.

Up to 50 acres - $3,368 deposit
Over 50 acres - $5,563 deposit
Up to 50 acres - $5,000 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs.

Over 50 acres - $7,500 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs.
100%
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
1 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
$0
$0
$0
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
82 Page 817 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT S-006
1 REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST

0.00 $0.00 0 $0
$0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$0 0.00TOTALS $0.00
83 Page 818 of 1234

S-007ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT CHANGE

APPLICATIONPLANNING
Review of a proposed zone text amendment for compliance with City codes and standards. $4,324 deposit
$5,000 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs. 100%
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
1 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
$0
$0
$0
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
84 Page 819 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT CHANGE S-007
1 REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST

0.00 $0.00 0 $0
$0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$0 0.00TOTALS $0.00
85 Page 820 of 1234

S-008SPECIFIC PLAN

APPLICATIONPLANNING
Review of a proposed new Specific Plan for compliance with City codes and standards. $11,081 deposit
$15,000 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs. 100%
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
1 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
$0
$0
$0
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
86 Page 821 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
SPECIFIC PLAN S-008
1 REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST

0.00 $0.00 0 $0
$0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$0 0.00TOTALS $0.00
87 Page 822 of 1234

S-009SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT

APPLICATIONPLANNING
Review of proposed amendment to an existing Specific Plan. $2,686 deposit
$7,500 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs. 100%
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
1 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
$0
$0
$0
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
88 Page 823 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT S-009
1 REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST

0.00 $0.00 0 $0
$0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$0 0.00TOTALS $0.00
89 Page 824 of 1234

S-010SPEC PLAN CONFORMITY DETERMINATION

APPLICATIONPLANNING
Review of minor changes to an approved Specific Plan to determine if it substantially conforms with previous approvals.
$2,354 deposit
$5,000 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs. 100%
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
1 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
$0
$0
$0
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
90 Page 825 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
SPEC PLAN CONFORMITY DETERMINATION S-010
1 REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST

0.00 $0.00 0 $0
$0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$0 0.00TOTALS $0.00
91 Page 826 of 1234

S-011ANNEXATION

APPLICATIONPLANNING
Review of a request for an annexation to the City for compliance with City codes and standards. $48,235 deposit plus actual costs for LAFCo
$25,000 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside or LAFCo costs.
100%
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
1 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
$0
$0
$0
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
92 Page 827 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
ANNEXATION S-011
1 REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST

0.00 $0.00 0 $0
$0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$0 0.00TOTALS $0.00
93 Page 828 of 1234

S-012PLAN OF SERVICES

APPLICATIONPLANNING
Review of a plan of services related to a proposed annexation for compliance with City codes and standards $3,584 deposit
$5,000 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs. 100%
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
1 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
$0
$0
$0
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
94 Page 829 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
PLAN OF SERVICES S-012
1 REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST

0.00 $0.00 0 $0
$0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$0 0.00TOTALS $0.00
95 Page 830 of 1234

S-013DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT

APPLICATIONPLANNING
Negotiate and enforce agreements to develop land within specific physical requirements. $42,426 deposit
$25,000 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs. 100%
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
1 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
$0
$0
$0
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
96 Page 831 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT S-013
1 REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST

0.00 $0.00 0 $0
$0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$0 0.00TOTALS $0.00
97 Page 832 of 1234

S-014DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT ANNUAL REVIEW

REVIEWPLANNING
Annual review of an approved Development Agreement.
$3,027.43 per review
$2,165 per review
100%
$3,027.00
$2,165.00
$862.00
1 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 139.82%
$862
$2,165
$3,027
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
98 Page 833 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT ANNUAL REVIEW S-014
1 REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PLANNING COMM DEV DIR/DEPUTY CM 7.00 $2,165.31 1 $2,165 $2,165 $2,165.31 7.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$2,165 7.00TOTALS $2,165.00
99 Page 834 of 1234

S-015DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AMENDMENT

APPLICATIONPLANNING
Review of amendment to an existing Development Agreement $41,231 deposit
$10,000 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs. 100%
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
1 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
$0
$0
$0
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
100 Page 835 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AMENDMENT S-015
1 REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST

0.00 $0.00 0 $0
$0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$0 0.00TOTALS $0.00
101 Page 836 of 1234

S-016DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT ASSIGNMENT

APPLICATIONPLANNING
Review of an Assignment of Development Agreement for compliance with City codes and standards. $3,521.16 per application
$5,000 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs. 100%
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
1 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
$0
$0
$0
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
102 Page 837 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT ASSIGNMENT S-016
1 REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST

0.00 $0.00 0 $0
$0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$0 0.00TOTALS $0.00
103 Page 838 of 1234

S-017ESTOPPEL CERTIFICATE

APPLICATIONPLANNING
Review a request for an Estoppel Certificate of a Development Agreement for compliance with City codes and standards.
$3,521.16 per application
$5,000 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs. 100%
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
1 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
$0
$0
$0
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
104 Page 839 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
ESTOPPEL CERTIFICATE S-017
1 REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST

0.00 $0.00 0 $0
$0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$0 0.00TOTALS $0.00
105 Page 840 of 1234

S-018ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW

APPLICATIONPLANNING
Environmental review of a particular project under the terms of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

Actual consultant cost plus 20% Administrative fee
Filing Fees - Actual costs
Actual consultant cost plus 20% Administrative fee
Filing Fees - Actual costs
100%
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
4 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
$0
$0
$0
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
106 Page 841 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW S-018
4 REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST

0.00 $0.00 0 $0
$0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$0 0.00TOTALS $0.00
107 Page 842 of 1234

S-019FACILITY FEE CREDIT AGREEMENT

APPLICATIONPLANNING
Review of a Facility Fee Credit Agreement in compliance with City codes and standards. $9,797 deposit
$10,000 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs. 100%
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
1 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
$0
$0
$0
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
108 Page 843 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
FACILITY FEE CREDIT AGREEMENT S-019
1 REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST

0.00 $0.00 0 $0
$0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$0 0.00TOTALS $0.00
109 Page 844 of 1234

S-020DENSITY BONUS AGREEMENT

APPLICATIONPLANNING
Review of an affordable housing agreement and density bonus for compliance with City codes and standards. $2,994.38 per application
$5,000 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs. 100%
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
1 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
$0
$0
$0
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
110 Page 845 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
DENSITY BONUS AGREEMENT S-020
1 REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST

0.00 $0.00 0 $0
$0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$0 0.00TOTALS $0.00
111 Page 846 of 1234

S-021PRE-APPLICATION MEETING

MEETINGPLANNING
Formal pre-application review of a proposed development on request. $907.92 per meeting/review
$2,210 per meeting/review
50% credit on the first meeting's fee if the project is submitted within six months. 100%
$907.92
$2,211.08
$(1,303.16)
26 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 41.06%
$(33,882)
$57,488
$23,606
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
112 Page 847 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
PRE-APPLICATION MEETING S-021
26 REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST ADMIN CUST SVCS COORD I/II 0.25 $19.65 26 $511 PUBLIC WORKS ASST DIR/PRIN/SR ENGINEER 2.00 $374.60 26 $9,740 PLANNING ASST/ASSOC PLANNER 2.25 $339.10 26 $8,817 PLANNING COMM DEV DIR/DEPUTY CM 1.00 $309.33 26 $8,043 PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER 4.50 $1,168.38 26 $30,378 $57,488 $2,211.06 10.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$57,488 10.00TOTALS $2,211.08
113 Page 848 of 1234

S-022ZONING MAP CHANGE

DEPOSITPLANNING
Reviewing a request for zoning map change on a specific parcel. $4,324 deposit
$5,000 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs. 100%
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
1 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
$0
$0
$0
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
114 Page 849 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
ZONING MAP CHANGE S-022
1 REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST

0.00 $0.00 0 $0
$0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$0 0.00TOTALS $0.00
115 Page 850 of 1234

S-023TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP

APPLICATIONPLANNING
Review of a proposed tentative parcel map consisting of the subdivision of land into four or fewer lots for residential, commercial or industrial development.
$1,723 deposit
$5,000 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs. 100%
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
2 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
$0
$0
$0
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
116 Page 851 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP S-023
2 REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST

0.00 $0.00 0 $0
$0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$0 0.00TOTALS $0.00
117 Page 852 of 1234

S-024TENTATIVE TRACT MAP

APPLICATIONPLANNING
Review of a proposed tentative tract map consisting of the subdivision of land into five or more lots for residential, commercial or industrial development.
$4,390 deposit
$7,500 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs. 100%
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
1 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
$0
$0
$0
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
118 Page 853 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP S-024
1 REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST

0.00 $0.00 0 $0
$0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$0 0.00TOTALS $0.00
119 Page 854 of 1234

S-025TENTATIVE MAP TIME EXTENSION

APPLICATIONPLANNING
Review of a proposed time extension to a tentative parcel or tract map for compliance with City codes and standards.
$846.98 per application
$2,190 per application
100%
$847.00
$2,188.00
$(1,341.00)
1 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 38.71%
$(1,341)
$2,188
$847
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
120 Page 855 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
TENTATIVE MAP TIME EXTENSION S-025
1 REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST ADMIN CUST SVCS COORD I/II 0.25 $19.65 1 $20 PLANNING ASST/ASSOC PLANNER 2.00 $301.42 1 $301 PLANNING COMM DEV DIR/DEPUTY CM 1.00 $309.33 1 $309 PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER 6.00 $1,557.84 1 $1,558 $2,188 $2,188.24 9.25TYPE SUBTOTAL
$2,188 9.25TOTALS $2,188.00
121 Page 856 of 1234

S-026CONDOMINIUM CONVERSION

APPLICATIONPLANNING
Review of the conversion of an existing apartment building into condominiums and resulting maps. $10,548 deposit
$10,000 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs. 100%
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
1 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
$0
$0
$0
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
122 Page 857 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
CONDOMINIUM CONVERSION S-026
1 REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST

0.00 $0.00 0 $0
$0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$0 0.00TOTALS $0.00
123 Page 858 of 1234

S-027VARIANCE

APPLICATIONPLANNING
Review of a request for a Variance from the Zoning Code for compliance with City codes and guidelines. $1,530.76 per application
$2,560 per application
100%
$1,530.77
$2,558.92
$(1,028.15)
13 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 59.82%
$(13,366)
$33,266
$19,900
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
124 Page 859 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
VARIANCE S-027
13 REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST ADMIN CUST SVCS COORD I/II 0.25 $19.65 13 $255 PLANNING ASST/ASSOC PLANNER 3.25 $489.81 13 $6,368 PLANNING COMM DEV DIR/DEPUTY CM 0.75 $232.00 13 $3,016 PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER 7.00 $1,817.48 13 $23,627 $33,266 $2,558.94 11.25TYPE SUBTOTAL
$33,266 11.25TOTALS $2,558.92
125 Page 860 of 1234

S-028MINOR VARIANCE/MODIF OF STANDARDS

APPLICATIONPLANNING
Review and of a requested minor variance or modification of standards for compliance with City codes and standards.
$154.94 per application
$245 per application
100%
$155.00
$246.00
$(91.00)
1 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 63.01%
$(91)
$246
$155
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
126 Page 861 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
MINOR VARIANCE/MODIF OF STANDARDS S-028
1 REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST ADMIN CUST SVCS COORD I/II 0.25 $19.65 1 $20 PLANNING ASST/ASSOC PLANNER 1.50 $226.07 1 $226 $246 $245.72 1.75TYPE SUBTOTAL
$246 1.75TOTALS $246.00
127 Page 862 of 1234

S-029PLOT PLAN

APPLICATIONPLANNING
Review the site and design characteristics of a particular property for compliance with City codes and standards. $3,778 deposit
$5,000 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs. 100%
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
5 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
$0
$0
$0
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
128 Page 863 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
PLOT PLAN S-029
5 REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST

0.00 $0.00 0 $0
$0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$0 0.00TOTALS $0.00
129 Page 864 of 1234

S-030PLOT PLAN AMENDMENT

APPLICATIONPLANNING
Review of a proposed amendment to an approved Plot Plan for compliance with City codes and standards. $2,148 deposit
$3,000 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs. 100%
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
1 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
$0
$0
$0
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
130 Page 865 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
PLOT PLAN AMENDMENT S-030
1 REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST

0.00 $0.00 0 $0
$0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$0 0.00TOTALS $0.00
131 Page 866 of 1234

S-031PLOT PLAN TIME EXTENSION

APPLICATIONPLANNING
Review a request for an extension to an approved Plot Plan, including advertising costs. $565 per application
$2,005 per application
100%
$565.00
$2,006.00
$(1,441.00)
1 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 28.17%
$(1,441)
$2,006
$565
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
132 Page 867 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
PLOT PLAN TIME EXTENSION S-031
1 REFERENCE NO.

S-032RESIDENTIAL ADMIN PLOT PLAN

APPLICATIONPLANNING
Review a request for a Residential Administrative Plot Plan for compliance City codes and standards. $516.45 per application
$925 per application
100%
$516.43
$923.57
$(407.14)
21 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 55.92%
$(8,550)
$19,395
$10,845
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
134 Page 869 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
RESIDENTIAL ADMIN PLOT PLAN S-032
21 REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST ADMIN CUST SVCS COORD I/II 0.25 $19.65 21 $413 PUBLIC WORKS ASST DIR/PRIN/SR ENGINEER 0.50 $93.65 21 $1,967 PLANNING ASST/ASSOC PLANNER 1.50 $226.07 21 $4,747 PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER 2.25 $584.19 21 $12,268 $19,395 $923.56 4.50TYPE SUBTOTAL
$19,395 4.50TOTALS $923.57
135 Page 870 of 1234

S-033NON-RESIDENTIAL ADMIN PLOT PLAN

APPLICATIONPLANNING
Review a request for a Non-Residential Administrative Plot Plan for compliance City codes and standards. $516.45 per application
$1,030 per application
100%
$516.45
$1,031.93
$(515.48)
58 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 50.05%
$(29,898)
$59,852
$29,954
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
136 Page 871 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
NON-RESIDENTIAL ADMIN PLOT PLAN S-033
58 REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST ADMIN CUST SVCS COORD I/II 0.25 $19.65 58 $1,140 POLICE PD SERGEANT 0.25 $70.70 58 $4,101 PUBLIC WORKS ASST DIR/PRIN/SR ENGINEER 0.50 $93.65 58 $5,432 PLANNING ASST/ASSOC PLANNER 1.75 $263.74 58 $15,297 PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER 2.25 $584.19 58 $33,883 $59,852 $1,031.93 5.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$59,852 5.00TOTALS $1,031.93
137 Page 872 of 1234

S-034MINOR PLOT PLAN - STAFF

APPLICATIONPLANNING
Review a request for a Minor Plot Plan reviewed by staff for compliance City codes and standards. $1,219.85 per application
$1,435 per application
100%
$1,219.88
$1,435.38
$(215.50)
8 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 84.99%
$(1,724)
$11,483
$9,759
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
138 Page 873 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
MINOR PLOT PLAN - STAFF S-034
8 REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST ADMIN CUST SVCS COORD I/II 0.25 $19.65 8 $157 POLICE PD SERGEANT 0.25 $70.70 8 $566 PUBLIC WORKS ASST DIR/PRIN/SR ENGINEER 1.00 $187.30 8 $1,498 PLANNING ASST/ASSOC PLANNER 2.00 $301.42 8 $2,411 PLANNING COMM DEV DIR/DEPUTY CM 0.25 $77.33 8 $619 PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER 3.00 $778.92 8 $6,231 $11,483 $1,435.32 6.75TYPE SUBTOTAL
$11,483 6.75TOTALS $1,435.38
139 Page 874 of 1234

S-035MINOR PLOT PLAN - PLAN COMM

APPLICATIONPLANNING
Review a request for a Minor Plot Plan reviewed by the Planning Commission for compliance City codes and standards.
$1,219.85 per application
$3,230 per application
100%
$1,220.00
$3,230.00
$(2,010.00)
1 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 37.77%
$(2,010)
$3,230
$1,220
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
140 Page 875 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
MINOR PLOT PLAN - PLAN COMM S-035
1 REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST ADMIN CUST SVCS COORD I/II 0.25 $19.65 1 $20 POLICE PD SERGEANT 0.50 $141.40 1 $141 PUBLIC WORKS ASST DIR/PRIN/SR ENGINEER 2.00 $374.60 1 $375 PLANNING ASST/ASSOC PLANNER 3.25 $489.81 1 $490 PLANNING COMM DEV DIR/DEPUTY CM 1.25 $386.66 1 $387 PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER 7.00 $1,817.48 1 $1,817 $3,230 $3,229.60 14.25TYPE SUBTOTAL
$3,230 14.25TOTALS $3,230.00
141 Page 876 of 1234

S-036PICK A LOT SITE PLAN REVIEW

LOTPLANNING
Review of a proposed request for the construction of a specific house on a specific lot within a subdivision. $103.29 per lot
$315 per lot
100%
$103.00
$317.00
$(214.00)
1 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 32.49%
$(214)
$317
$103
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
142 Page 877 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
PICK A LOT SITE PLAN REVIEW S-036
1 REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST ADMIN CUST SVCS COORD I/II 0.25 $19.65 1 $20 PLANNING ASST/ASSOC PLANNER 0.25 $37.68 1 $38 PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER 1.00 $259.64 1 $260 $317 $316.97 1.50TYPE SUBTOTAL
$317 1.50TOTALS $317.00
143 Page 878 of 1234

S-037MAP/PLOT PLAN CONFORMITY DETERMIN.

APPLICATIONPLANNING
Review of minor changes to an approved Map/Plot Plan to determine if it substantially conforms with previous approvals.
$984 deposit
$2,500 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs. 100%
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
1 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
$0
$0
$0
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
144 Page 879 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
MAP/PLOT PLAN CONFORMITY DETERMIN.S-037
1 REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST

0.00 $0.00 0 $0
$0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$0 0.00TOTALS $0.00
145 Page 880 of 1234

S-038LANDSCAPE PLAN REVIEW

SHEETPLANNING
Review the plans of a proposed construction of landscaping which was required as part of a development. $743.69 per application
$20 per application plus $140 per sheet
100%
$744.00
$857.00
$(113.00)
1 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 86.81%
$(113)
$857
$744
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
146 Page 881 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
LANDSCAPE PLAN REVIEW S-038
1 REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST ADMIN CUST SVCS COORD I/II 0.25 $19.65 1 $20 PLANNING ASST/ASSOC PLANNER 6 Sheets 1.25 $188.39 1 $188 PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER 6 Sheets 2.50 $649.10 1 $649 $857 $857.14 4.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$857 4.00TOTALS $857.00
147 Page 882 of 1234

S-039LANDSCAPE PLAN AMENDMENT

APPLICATIONPLANNING
Review a request to amend an existing landscape plan in compliance to City codes and standards. $614.58 per application
$20 per application plus $140 per sheet
Cost is based on six sheets
100%
$615.00
$857.00
$(242.00)
1 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 71.76%
$(242)
$857
$615
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
148 Page 883 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
LANDSCAPE PLAN AMENDMENT S-039
1 REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST ADMIN CUST SVCS COORD I/II 0.25 $19.65 1 $20 PLANNING ASST/ASSOC PLANNER 1.25 $188.39 1 $188 PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER 2.50 $649.10 1 $649 $857 $857.14 4.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$857 4.00TOTALS $857.00
149 Page 884 of 1234

S-040LANDSCAPE INSPECTION

LOTPLANNING
To inspect construction of landscaping which was required as part of a development. $81.60 per lot
$205 per lot
100%
$82.00
$205.00
$(123.00)
1 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 40.00%
$(123)
$205
$82
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
150 Page 885 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
LANDSCAPE INSPECTION S-040
1 REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PLANNING ASST/ASSOC PLANNER 0.50 $75.36 1 $75 PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER 0.50 $129.82 1 $130 $205 $205.18 1.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$205 1.00TOTALS $205.00
151 Page 886 of 1234

S-041SIGN PROGRAM

APPLICATIONPLANNING
Review of a comprehensive sign criteria program by the Planning Commission for a development to assure compliance with City codes and standards.
$1,652.64 per application
$1,870 per application
100%
$1,653.00
$1,872.00
$(219.00)
1 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 88.30%
$(219)
$1,872
$1,653
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
152 Page 887 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
SIGN PROGRAM S-041
1 REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST ADMIN CUST SVCS COORD I/II 0.25 $19.65 1 $20 PLANNING ASST/ASSOC PLANNER 5.75 $866.58 1 $867 PLANNING COMM DEV DIR/DEPUTY CM 0.25 $77.33 1 $77 PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER 3.50 $908.74 1 $909 $1,872 $1,872.30 9.75TYPE SUBTOTAL
$1,872 9.75TOTALS $1,872.00
153 Page 888 of 1234

S-042SIGN PROGRAM AMENDMENT

APPLICATIONPLANNING
Review of proposed amendment to an approved sign program. $969.89 per application
$1,870 per application
100%
$970.00
$1,872.00
$(902.00)
1 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 51.82%
$(902)
$1,872
$970
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
154 Page 889 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
SIGN PROGRAM AMENDMENT S-042
1 REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST ADMIN CUST SVCS COORD I/II 0.25 $19.65 1 $20 PLANNING ASST/ASSOC PLANNER 5.75 $866.58 1 $867 PLANNING COMM DEV DIR/DEPUTY CM 0.25 $77.33 1 $77 PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER 3.50 $908.74 1 $909 $1,872 $1,872.30 9.75TYPE SUBTOTAL
$1,872 9.75TOTALS $1,872.00
155 Page 890 of 1234

S-043SIGN PERMIT

APPLICATIONPLANNING
Review of a new sign for compliance with City codes and standards. $206.58 per application
$375 per application
100%
$207.00
$376.00
$(169.00)
1 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 55.05%
$(169)
$376
$207
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
156 Page 891 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
SIGN PERMIT S-043
1 REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST ADMIN CUST SVCS COORD I/II 0.25 $19.65 1 $20 PLANNING ASST/ASSOC PLANNER 1.50 $226.07 1 $226 PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER 0.50 $129.82 1 $130 $376 $375.54 2.25TYPE SUBTOTAL
$376 2.25TOTALS $376.00
157 Page 892 of 1234

S-044SIGN PERMIT PANEL CHANGE

APPLICATIONPLANNING
Review of a panel change to an existing sign for compliance with City codes and standards. $82.63 per application
$170 per application
100%
$83.00
$170.00
$(87.00)
1 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 48.82%
$(87)
$170
$83
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
158 Page 893 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
SIGN PERMIT PANEL CHANGE S-044
1 REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST ADMIN CUST SVCS COORD I/II 0.25 $19.65 1 $20 PLANNING ASST/ASSOC PLANNER 1.00 $150.71 1 $151 $170 $170.36 1.25TYPE SUBTOTAL
$170 1.25TOTALS $170.00
159 Page 894 of 1234

S-045TEMPORARY SIGN PERMIT

APPLICATIONPLANNING
Review of a proposed temporary sign or banner for compliance with City codes and standards.

None
$170 per application
100%
$0.00
$170.00
$(170.00)
1 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
$(170)
$170
$0
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
160 Page 895 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
TEMPORARY SIGN PERMIT S-045
1 REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST ADMIN CUST SVCS COORD I/II 0.25 $19.65 1 $20 PLANNING ASST/ASSOC PLANNER 1.00 $150.71 1 $151 $170 $170.36 1.25TYPE SUBTOTAL
$170 1.25TOTALS $170.00
161 Page 896 of 1234

S-046UNLICENSED GROUP HOME PERMIT

APPLICATIONPLANNING
Inspection and registration of unlicensed group homes within the City. $800 per application
$3,335 per application
100%
$800.00
$3,335.50
$(2,535.50)
2 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 23.98%
$(5,071)
$6,671
$1,600
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
162 Page 897 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
UNLICENSED GROUP HOME PERMIT S-046
2 REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST ADMIN CUST SVCS COORD I/II 0.25 $19.65 2 $39 POLICE PD SERGEANT 2.00 $565.58 2 $1,131 POLICE SUPPORT SUPPORT SVCS SPEC I/II 0.50 $52.25 2 $105 PLANNING ASST/ASSOC PLANNER 2.25 $339.10 2 $678 PLANNING COMM DEV DIR/DEPUTY CM 1.75 $541.33 2 $1,083 PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER 7.00 $1,817.48 2 $3,635 $6,671 $3,335.39 13.75TYPE SUBTOTAL
$6,671 13.75TOTALS $3,335.50
163 Page 898 of 1234

S-047AUTOMOBILE FOR HIRE REVIEW

APPLICATIONPLANNING
Review of an Automobile for Hire application in compliance with City codes and standards. $413.16 per application
$2,720 per application
100%
$413.00
$2,718.00
$(2,305.00)
1 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 15.19%
$(2,305)
$2,718
$413
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
164 Page 899 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
AUTOMOBILE FOR HIRE REVIEW S-047
1 REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST ADMIN CUST SVCS COORD I/II 0.25 $19.65 1 $20 PLANNING ASST/ASSOC PLANNER 2.25 $339.10 1 $339 PLANNING COMM DEV DIR/DEPUTY CM 1.75 $541.33 1 $541 PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER 7.00 $1,817.48 1 $1,817 $2,718 $2,717.56 11.25TYPE SUBTOTAL
$2,718 11.25TOTALS $2,718.00
165 Page 900 of 1234

S-048HOME OCCUPATION PERMIT

APPLICATIONPLANNING
Review an application to conduct a business in a residential zone to determine whether it is allowed by the Zoning Code.
$77.47 per application
$225 per application
100%
$77.00
$225.00
$(148.00)
1 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 34.22%
$(148)
$225
$77
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
166 Page 901 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
HOME OCCUPATION PERMIT S-048
1 REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST ADMIN CUST SVCS COORD I/II 0.25 $19.65 1 $20 PLANNING ASST/ASSOC PLANNER 0.50 $75.36 1 $75 PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER 0.50 $129.82 1 $130 $225 $224.83 1.25TYPE SUBTOTAL
$225 1.25TOTALS $225.00
167 Page 902 of 1234

S-049MINOR SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT

APPLICATIONPLANNING
Review of a proposed minor special event of up to 500 people or has an impact on the public right-of-way. $77.47 per application
$1,290 per application
100%
$77.47
$1,288.47
$(1,211.00)
15 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 6.01%
$(18,165)
$19,327
$1,162
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
168 Page 903 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
MINOR SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT S-049
15 REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST ADMIN CUST SVCS COORD I/II 0.25 $19.65 15 $295 POLICE PD SERGEANT 0.50 $141.21 15 $2,118 PUBLIC WORKS CUST SVCS COORD I/II 0.50 $32.50 15 $488 PUBLIC WORKS ASST DIR/PRIN/SR ENGINEER 0.50 $93.65 15 $1,405 PUBLIC WORKS PW DIR/CITY ENGINEER 0.50 $147.20 15 $2,208 PLANNING ASST/ASSOC PLANNER 0.50 $75.36 15 $1,130 PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER 3.00 $778.92 15 $11,684 $19,327 $1,288.49 5.75TYPE SUBTOTAL
$19,327 5.75TOTALS $1,288.47
169 Page 904 of 1234

S-050MAJOR SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT

APPLICATIONPLANNING
Review of a proposed major special event of more than 500 people or involving a closure in the public right-of-way or public park.
$77.47 per application
$1,985 per application
Carnival/Circus/Menagerie - additional $455 per application Events of more than 1,000 people - $5,000 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all staff involved plus any outside costs.
100%
$77.40
$2,078.40
$(2,001.00)
5 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 3.72%
$(10,005)
$10,392
$387
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
170 Page 905 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
MAJOR SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT S-050
5 REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST ADMIN CUST SVCS COORD I/II 0.25 $19.65 5 $98 POLICE PD SERGEANT 0.50 $141.40 5 $707 PUBLIC WORKS CUST SVCS COORD I/II 0.50 $32.50 5 $163 PUBLIC WORKS ASST DIR/PRIN/SR ENGINEER 0.50 $93.65 5 $468 PUBLIC WORKS PW DIR/CITY ENGINEER 0.50 $147.20 5 $736 PLANNING ASST/ASSOC PLANNER 0.50 $75.36 5 $377 PLANNING COMM DEV DIR/DEPUTY CM 1.00 $309.33 5 $1,547 PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER 4.50 $1,168.38 5 $5,842 $9,937 $1,987.47 8.25TYPE SUBTOTAL
PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER Add Carnv/Circ/Menag 1.75 $454.37 1 $454 $454 $454.37 1.75TYPE SUBTOTAL
$10,392 10.00TOTALS $2,078.40
171 Page 906 of 1234

S-051MISCELLANEOUS SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT

APPLICATIONPLANNING
Review of a proposed miscellaneous special event that impacts only one department, such as a block party permit.
$77.47 per application
$1,000 per application
100%
$77.00
$1,000.00
$(923.00)
1 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 7.70%
$(923)
$1,000
$77
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
172 Page 907 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
MISCELLANEOUS SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT S-051
1 REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST ADMIN CUST SVCS COORD I/II 0.25 $19.65 1 $20 PUBLIC WORKS CUST SVCS COORD I/II 0.50 $32.50 1 $33 PUBLIC WORKS ASST DIR/PRIN/SR ENGINEER 0.50 $93.65 1 $94 PLANNING ASST/ASSOC PLANNER 0.50 $75.36 1 $75 PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER 3.00 $778.92 1 $779 $1,000 $1,000.08 4.75TYPE SUBTOTAL
$1,000 4.75TOTALS $1,000.00
173 Page 908 of 1234

S-052APPEAL TO PLANNING COMISSION

APPEALPLANNING
Processing and review of an appeal of a staff decision to the Planning Commission. $642.46 per appeal
$2,585 per appeal
100%
$642.00
$2,583.00
$(1,941.00)
1 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 24.85%
$(1,941)
$2,583
$642
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
174 Page 909 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
APPEAL TO PLANNING COMISSION S-052
1 REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST ADMIN CUST SVCS COORD I/II 0.25 $19.65 1 $20 PLANNING ASST/ASSOC PLANNER 2.50 $376.78 1 $377 PLANNING COMM DEV DIR/DEPUTY CM 3.50 $1,082.66 1 $1,083 PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER 4.25 $1,103.47 1 $1,103 $2,583 $2,582.56 10.50TYPE SUBTOTAL
$2,583 10.50TOTALS $2,583.00
175 Page 910 of 1234

S-053APPEAL TO CITY COUNCIL

APPEALPLANNING
Processing and review of an appeal to the City Council. $1,945.98 per appeal
$2,985 per appeal
100%
$1,946.00
$2,986.00
$(1,040.00)
1 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 65.17%
$(1,040)
$2,986
$1,946
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
176 Page 911 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
APPEAL TO CITY COUNCIL S-053
1 REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST ADMIN CUST SVCS COORD I/II 0.25 $19.65 1 $20 PLANNING ASST/ASSOC PLANNER 1.50 $226.07 1 $226 PLANNING COMM DEV DIR/DEPUTY CM 5.50 $1,701.32 1 $1,701 PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER 4.00 $1,038.56 1 $1,039 $2,986 $2,985.60 11.25TYPE SUBTOTAL
$2,986 11.25TOTALS $2,986.00
177 Page 912 of 1234

S-054PLANNING INFORMATION REQUEST

LETTERPLANNING
Providing a written response to a request for the zoning information of a particular parcel or additional information.
$56.81 per letter
$225 per letter
Plus a deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved for additional research.
100%
$57.00
$225.00
$(168.00)
1 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 25.33%
$(168)
$225
$57
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
178 Page 913 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
PLANNING INFORMATION REQUEST S-054
1 REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST ADMIN CUST SVCS COORD I/II 0.25 $19.65 1 $20 PLANNING ASST/ASSOC PLANNER 0.50 $75.36 1 $75 PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER 0.50 $129.82 1 $130 $225 $224.83 1.25TYPE SUBTOTAL
$225 1.25TOTALS $225.00
179 Page 914 of 1234

S-055MISCELLANEOUS PLANNING REVIEW

APPLICATIONPLANNING
Review miscellaneous applications that are not specifically identified in City fee schedule. $1,195 deposit
Planning Commission Hearing required by any action - $786.04 Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs.
100%
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
1 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
$0
$0
$0
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
180 Page 915 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
MISCELLANEOUS PLANNING REVIEW S-055
1 REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST

0.00 $0.00 0 $0
$0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$0 0.00TOTALS $0.00
181 Page 916 of 1234

S-056COM DEV TECHNOLOGY SURCHARGE
PERMITCOMM. DEVELOPMENT
Surcharge for the maintenance and purchase of Community Development Technology needs.

3.29% Of Building, Planning, and Engineering fees

3.29% Of Building, Planning, and Engineering fees
100%
$169,000.00
$170,000.00
$(1,000.00)
1 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 99.41%
$(1,000)
$170,000
$169,000
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
182 Page 917 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
COM DEV TECHNOLOGY SURCHARGE S-056
1 REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PLANNING 0.00 $170,000.00 1 $170,000 $170,000 $170,000.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$170,000 0.00TOTALS $170,000.00
183 Page 918 of 1234

S-057BUILDING PLAN CHECK/INSPECTION

PLAN/PERMITBLDG & SAFETY
Review of Building construction plans and the inspection of the resulting construction for compliance with City codes and standards.

See Appendix C for detail
See Appendix C for detail
100%
$2,876,175.00
$2,549,034.00
$327,141.00
1 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 112.83%
$327,141
$2,549,034
$2,876,175
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
184 Page 919 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
BUILDING PLAN CHECK/INSPECTION S-057
1 REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST ADMIN CUST SVCS COORD I/II 7.5% Of 3 368.78 $28,986.11 1 $28,986 PUBLIC WORKS ASST DIR/PRIN/SR ENGINEER 5% Of 2 163.90 $30,698.47 1 $30,698 PLANNING ASST/ASSOC PLANNER 25% 409.75 $61,753.42 1 $61,753 PLANNING COMM DEV DIR/DEPUTY CM 5% 81.55 $25,225.86 1 $25,226 PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER 35% 573.65 $148,942.49 1 $148,942 BUILDING & SAFETY BUILDING INSPECTOR 100% Of 3 4,917.00 $701,410.05 1 $701,410 BUILDING & SAFETY BLDG PLANS EXAMINER 100% Of 1 1,639.00 $206,415.66 1 $206,416 BUILDING & SAFETY BLDG PERMIT TECH I/II Remainder Of 2 2,888.00 $242,043.28 1 $242,043 BUILDING & SAFETY CHIEF BLDG OFFICIAL 100% Of 1 1,639.00 $397,998.37 1 $397,998 BUILDING & SAFETY OVERTIME $3,000 2,000.00 $6,360.00 1 $6,360 BUILDING & SAFETY Contr Svcs/Exp 0.00 $49,200.00 1 $49,200 BUILDING & SAFETY Contract Inspection 0.00 $150,000.00 1 $150,000 BUILDING & SAFETY Plan Check Fees 0.00 $500,000.00 1 $500,000 $2,549,034 $2,549,033.71 14,680.63TYPE SUBTOTAL
$2,549,034 14,680.63TOTALS $2,549,034.00
185 Page 920 of 1234

S-058FINAL PARCEL MAP

MAPENGINEERING
Review of a final parcel map (4 lots or less) for compliance with City codes and standards. $2,500 deposit
$5,000 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs. 100%
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
3 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
$0
$0
$0
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
186 Page 921 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
FINAL PARCEL MAP S-058
3 REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST

0.00 $0.00 0 $0
$0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$0 0.00TOTALS $0.00
187 Page 922 of 1234

S-059FINAL TRACT MAP

MAPENGINEERING
Review of a final map (5 or more lots) for compliance with City codes and standards, as well as the Subdivision Map Act.
$4,000 deposit
$7,500 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs. 100%
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
3 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
$0
$0
$0
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
188 Page 923 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
FINAL TRACT MAP S-059
3 REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST

0.00 $0.00 0 $0
$0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$0 0.00TOTALS $0.00
189 Page 924 of 1234

S-060TENTATIVE REVERSION TO ACREAGE

APPLICATIONENGINEERING
Review a request for a Tentative Reversion to Acreage.
$1,000 deposit
This fee should be removed as the service is no longer provided. 100%
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
1 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
$0
$0
$0
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
190 Page 925 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
TENTATIVE REVERSION TO ACREAGE S-060
1 REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST

0.00 $0.00 0 $0
$0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$0 0.00TOTALS $0.00
191 Page 926 of 1234

S-061LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT/PARCEL MERGER

APPLICATIONENGINEERING
Review and processing of a Lot Line Adjustment or Parcel Merger. $1,200 deposit with charges at contract cost plus 20% for administration $1,200 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs. 100%
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
3 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
$0
$0
$0
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
192 Page 927 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT/PARCEL MERGER S-061
3 REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST

0.00 $0.00 0 $0
$0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$0 0.00TOTALS $0.00
193 Page 928 of 1234

S-062FINAL MONUMENT SETTING

APPLICATIONENGINEERING
Review of Final Monument Setting.

First four parcels/lots
- $2,582.25 plus $258.23 per
each additional parcel/lot
This fee should be removed from the fee schedule as the service is no longer provided. 100%
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
1 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
$0
$0
$0
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
194 Page 929 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
FINAL MONUMENT SETTING S-062
1 REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST

0.00 $0.00 0 $0
$0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$0 0.00TOTALS $0.00
195 Page 930 of 1234

S-063FINAL MONUMENT INSPECTION

PROJECTENGINEERING
Inspection of the placement of final monuments.

First four parcels/lots
- $1,032.90 plus $25.82 per
each additional parcel/lot
$1,500 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs. 100%
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
1 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
$0
$0
$0
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
196 Page 931 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
FINAL MONUMENT INSPECTION S-063
1 REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST

0.00 $0.00 0 $0
$0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$0 0.00TOTALS $0.00
197 Page 932 of 1234

S-064PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN CHECK

PLANENGINEERING
Review of the plan for preliminary grading.

None
$565 per plan
100%
$0.00
$564.00
$(564.00)
15 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
$(8,460)
$8,460
$0
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
198 Page 933 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN CHECK S-064
15 REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST ADMIN CUST SVCS COORD I/II 0.25 $19.65 15 $295 PUBLIC WORKS ENG DEV TECH I/II 1.00 $76.07 15 $1,141 PUBLIC WORKS ASST DIR/PRIN/SR ENGINEER 2.50 $468.25 15 $7,024 $8,460 $563.97 3.75TYPE SUBTOTAL
$8,460 3.75TOTALS $564.00
199 Page 934 of 1234

S-065RESIDENTIAL GRADING PLAN CHECK

SHEETENGINEERING
Review of the plan of Residential Grading or Stockpiles, including three reviews.

Grading/Stockpile - $620.77 per sheet
Wall/Fence - $273.72 per sheet
Parking Lot Plan Check and Inspection - $258.23 per sheet Erosion Control - $1,000 deposit
$95 per plan plus $750 per sheet
100%
$620.77
$844.93
$(224.16)
81 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 73.47%
$(18,157)
$68,439
$50,282
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
200 Page 935 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
RESIDENTIAL GRADING PLAN CHECK S-065
81 REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST ADMIN CUST SVCS COORD I/II 0.25 $19.65 81 $1,592 PUBLIC WORKS ENG DEV TECH I/II 1.00 $76.07 81 $6,162 PUBLIC WORKS ASST DIR/PRIN/SR ENGINEER Per Sheet 4.00 $749.20 81 $60,685 $68,439 $844.92 5.25TYPE SUBTOTAL
$68,439 5.25TOTALS $844.93
201 Page 936 of 1234

S-066RES GRADING PLAN CHECK AMENDMENT

PLANENGINEERING
Review of the plan of a proposed amendment to an approved Residential Grading or Stockpile Plan. $2,500 deposit
$3,000 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs. 100%
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
25 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
$0
$0
$0
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
202 Page 937 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
RES GRADING PLAN CHECK AMENDMENT S-066
25 REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST

0.00 $0.00 0 $0
$0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$0 0.00TOTALS $0.00
203 Page 938 of 1234

S-067RES GRADING PLAN CHECK ADD'L REVIEW

REVIEWENGINEERING
Fourth and subsequent review of a Residential Grading Plan. $1,000 deposit with charges at contract cost plus 20% for administration $1,000 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs. 100%
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
9 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
$0
$0
$0
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
204 Page 939 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
RES GRADING PLAN CHECK ADD'L REVIEW S-067
9 REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST

0.00 $0.00 0 $0
$0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$0 0.00TOTALS $0.00
205 Page 940 of 1234

S-068COMMERCIAL GRADING PLAN CHECK

SHEETENGINEERING
Review of the plan of Commercial Grading or Stockpile, including three reviews.

Grading/Stockpile - $812.89 per sheet
Wall/Fence - $273.72 per sheet
Parking Lot Plan Check and Inspection - $258.23 per sheet Erosion Control - $1,000 deposit
$95 per plan plus $1,125 per sheet
100%
$812.88
$1,219.50
$(406.62)
24 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 66.66%
$(9,759)
$29,268
$19,509
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
206 Page 941 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
COMMERCIAL GRADING PLAN CHECK S-068
24 REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST ADMIN CUST SVCS COORD I/II 0.25 $19.65 24 $472 PUBLIC WORKS ENG DEV TECH I/II 1.00 $76.07 24 $1,826 PUBLIC WORKS ASST DIR/PRIN/SR ENGINEER Per Sheet 6.00 $1,123.80 24 $26,971 $29,268 $1,219.52 7.25TYPE SUBTOTAL
$29,268 7.25TOTALS $1,219.50
207 Page 942 of 1234

S-069COMMERCIAL GRADING PLAN AMENDMENT

PLANENGINEERING
Review of the plan for a proposed amendment to an approved Commercial Grading or Stockpile Plan. $2,500 deposit
$3,000 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs. 100%
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
25 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
$0
$0
$0
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
208 Page 943 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
COMMERCIAL GRADING PLAN AMENDMENT S-069
25 REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST

0.00 $0.00 0 $0
$0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$0 0.00TOTALS $0.00
209 Page 944 of 1234

S-070COMM GRADING PLAN CHECK ADD'L REV

REVIEWENGINEERING
Fourth and subsequent review of a Commercial Grading Plan. $1,000 deposit with charges at contract cost plus 20% for administration $1,000 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs. 100%
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
4 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
$0
$0
$0
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
210 Page 945 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
COMM GRADING PLAN CHECK ADD'L REV S-070
4 REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST

0.00 $0.00 0 $0
$0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$0 0.00TOTALS $0.00
211 Page 946 of 1234

S-071GRADING/STOCKPILE INSPECTION

PERMITENGINEERING
Inspection of the construction of Grading or Stockpile Improvements. 2,000-10,000 CY - $1,735.27 plus $433.82 each additional 1,000 cubic Yards or fraction thereof up to 10,000 cubic yards
10,001-100,000 CY - $3,904.36 plus $63.01 each additional 1,000 cubic Yards or fraction thereof up to 100,000 cubic yards
100,001-200,000 CY - $10,845.45 plus $108.45 each additional 1,000 cubic Yards or fraction thereof up to 200,000 cubic yards
200,001+ CY - $25,000 deposit
Clear & Grub - $5,000 plus $500 per acre over 10 acres deposit Charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs. 100%
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
1 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
$0
$0
$0
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
212 Page 947 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
GRADING/STOCKPILE INSPECTION S-071
1 REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST

0.00 $0.00 0 $0
$0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$0 0.00TOTALS $0.00
213 Page 948 of 1234

S-072GRADING/STOCKPILE RES. INFILL INSP

PERMITENGINEERING
Inspection of Residential Grading or Stockpile of less than one acre. $433.82 per application
$435 per permit
100%
$434.00
$411.00
$23.00
1 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 105.60%
$23
$411
$434
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
214 Page 949 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
GRADING/STOCKPILE RES. INFILL INSP S-072
1 REFERENCE NO.

S-073STREET LIGHT PLAN REVIEW

PLANENGINEERING
Review of a street light plan for compliance with City codes and standards. $623.87 per plan
$95 per plan plus $655 per sheet
100%
$208.00
$751.27
$(543.27)
33 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 27.69%
$(17,928)
$24,792
$6,864
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
216 Page 951 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
STREET LIGHT PLAN REVIEW S-073
33 REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST ADMIN CUST SVCS COORD I/II 0.25 $19.65 33 $648 PUBLIC WORKS ENG DEV TECH I/II 1.00 $76.07 33 $2,510 PUBLIC WORKS ASST DIR/PRIN/SR ENGINEER Per Sheet 3.50 $655.55 33 $21,633 $24,792 $751.27 4.75TYPE SUBTOTAL
$24,792 4.75TOTALS $751.27
217 Page 952 of 1234

S-074IMPROVEMENT CONSTRUCTION PLAN CHECK

SHEETENGINEERING
Review of on-site and offsite Public Improvement Construction plans, including three reviews. $686.88 per sheet
$95 per plan plus $1,030 per sheet
100%
$686.88
$1,125.87
$(438.99)
85 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 61.01%
$(37,314)
$95,699
$58,385
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
218 Page 953 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
IMPROVEMENT CONSTRUCTION PLAN CHECK S-074
85 REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST ADMIN CUST SVCS COORD I/II 0.25 $19.65 85 $1,670 PUBLIC WORKS ENG DEV TECH I/II 1.00 $76.07 85 $6,466 PUBLIC WORKS ASST DIR/PRIN/SR ENGINEER Per Sheet 5.50 $1,030.15 85 $87,563 $95,699 $1,125.87 6.75TYPE SUBTOTAL
$95,699 6.75TOTALS $1,125.87
219 Page 954 of 1234

S-075IMPROVEMENT CONSTRUCTION PLAN AMEND

PLANENGINEERING
Review of an proposed amendment to an approved Public Improvement Construction plan. $2,500 deposit
$1,500 deposit with charges at contract cost plus 20% for administration 100%
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
52 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
$0
$0
$0
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
220 Page 955 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
IMPROVEMENT CONSTRUCTION PLAN AMEND S-075
52 REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST

0.00 $0.00 0 $0
$0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$0 0.00TOTALS $0.00
221 Page 956 of 1234

S-076IMPROVEMENT CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION

PROJECTENGINEERING
Processing and inspection of the construction of on-site of off-site Public Improvements.

Deposit based on the Engineers Estimate
(Minimum $750)
Street Light Inspection - $78.50 per light
Deposit based on the Engineers Estimate
(Minimum $750)
100%
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
16 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
$0
$0
$0
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
222 Page 957 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
IMPROVEMENT CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION S-076
16 REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST

0.00 $0.00 0 $0
$0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$0 0.00TOTALS $0.00
223 Page 958 of 1234

S-077SUBDIVISION/IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT

AGREEMENTENGINEERING
Processing and review of a Subdivision or Improvement Agreement. $288.18 per agreement
$725 per agreement plus actual costs for legal services 100%
$288.19
$726.67
$(438.48)
27 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 39.66%
$(11,839)
$19,620
$7,781
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
224 Page 959 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
SUBDIVISION/IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT S-077
27 REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST ADMIN CUST SVCS COORD I/II 0.25 $19.65 27 $531 PUBLIC WORKS ENG DEV TECH I/II 0.50 $38.04 27 $1,027 PUBLIC WORKS ASST DIR/PRIN/SR ENGINEER 2.00 $374.60 27 $10,114 PUBLIC WORKS PW DIR/CITY ENGINEER 1.00 $294.39 27 $7,949 $19,620 $726.68 3.75TYPE SUBTOTAL
$19,620 3.75TOTALS $726.67
225 Page 960 of 1234

S-078PERFORMANCE BOND RELEASE

APPLICATIONENGINEERING
Processing and review of a request for a Performance Bond Release. $484.43 per application
$915 per application
100%
$484.44
$914.00
$(429.56)
16 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 53.00%
$(6,873)
$14,624
$7,751
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
226 Page 961 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
PERFORMANCE BOND RELEASE S-078
16 REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST ADMIN CUST SVCS COORD I/II 0.25 $19.65 16 $314 PUBLIC WORKS ENG DEV TECH I/II 0.50 $38.04 16 $609 PUBLIC WORKS ASST DIR/PRIN/SR ENGINEER 3.00 $561.90 16 $8,990 PUBLIC WORKS PW DIR/CITY ENGINEER 1.00 $294.39 16 $4,710 $14,624 $913.98 4.75TYPE SUBTOTAL
$14,624 4.75TOTALS $914.00
227 Page 962 of 1234

S-079BOND RELEASE INSPECTION

PROJECTENGINEERING
Inspection of a request for a Bond Release.
$3,000 deposit
$3,000 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs. 100%
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
26 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
$0
$0
$0
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
228 Page 963 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
BOND RELEASE INSPECTION S-079
26 REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST

0.00 $0.00 0 $0
$0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$0 0.00TOTALS $0.00
229 Page 964 of 1234

S-080MAINTENANCE BOND RELEASE

APPLICATIONENGINEERING
Processing and review of a request for a Maintenance Bond Release. $484.43 per application
$915 per application
100%
$484.50
$914.00
$(429.50)
6 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 53.01%
$(2,577)
$5,484
$2,907
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
230 Page 965 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
MAINTENANCE BOND RELEASE S-080
6 REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST ADMIN CUST SVCS COORD I/II 0.25 $19.65 6 $118 PUBLIC WORKS ENG DEV TECH I/II 0.50 $38.04 6 $228 PUBLIC WORKS ASST DIR/PRIN/SR ENGINEER 3.00 $561.90 6 $3,371 PUBLIC WORKS PW DIR/CITY ENGINEER 1.00 $294.39 6 $1,766 $5,484 $913.98 4.75TYPE SUBTOTAL
$5,484 4.75TOTALS $914.00
231 Page 966 of 1234

S-081MAINTENANCE BOND INSPECTION

PROJECTENGINEERING
Inspection of a request to release a Maintenance Bond.
$3,000 deposit
$3,000 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs. 100%
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
2 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
$0
$0
$0
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
232 Page 967 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
MAINTENANCE BOND INSPECTION S-081
2 REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST

0.00 $0.00 0 $0
$0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$0 0.00TOTALS $0.00
233 Page 968 of 1234

S-082SUSPENSION OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT

AGREEMENTENGINEERING
Processing a suspension of an Improvement Agreement.
$1,000 deposit
This fee should be removed as the service is no longer provided. 100%
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
1 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
$0
$0
$0
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
234 Page 969 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
SUSPENSION OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT S-082
1 REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST

0.00 $0.00 0 $0
$0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$0 0.00TOTALS $0.00
235 Page 970 of 1234

S-083APPEAL SUSPENSION OF IMPROVEMENT

APPEALENGINEERING
Processing an Appeal for Suspension of Improvement Required. $1,000 deposit
This fee should be removed as the service is no longer provided. 100%
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
1 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
$0
$0
$0
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
236 Page 971 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
APPEAL SUSPENSION OF IMPROVEMENT S-083
1 REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST

0.00 $0.00 0 $0
$0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$0 0.00TOTALS $0.00
237 Page 972 of 1234

S-084STREET VACATION/OFFER OF DEDICATION

APPLICATIONENGINEERING
Review and processing of a Street Vacation and/or Offer of Dedication. $1,200 deposit with charges at contract cost plus 20% for administration $2,000 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs. 100%
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
6 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
$0
$0
$0
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
238 Page 973 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
STREET VACATION/OFFER OF DEDICATION S-084
6 REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST

0.00 $0.00 0 $0
$0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$0 0.00TOTALS $0.00
239 Page 974 of 1234

S-085NON-STANDARD ENCROACH PERMIT APPL

APPLICATIONENGINEERING
Processing of a Non-Standard Encroachment permit application. $51.65 per application
$60 per application
100%
$51.65
$57.69
$(6.04)
246

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 89.53%
$(1,486)
$14,192
$12,706
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
240 Page 975 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
NON-STANDARD ENCROACH PERMIT APPL S-085
246
REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST ADMIN CUST SVCS COORD I/II 0.25 $19.65 246 $4,834 PUBLIC WORKS ENG DEV TECH I/II 0.50 $38.04 246 $9,358 $14,192 $57.69 0.75TYPE SUBTOTAL
$14,192 0.75TOTALS $57.69
241 Page 976 of 1234

S-086EXIST RESID STANDARD ENCROACH PRMT

PERMITENGINEERING
Review of an Encroachment Permit for Existing Residential Standard ROW Improvement, which includes the Application Processing, Plan Check, and Inspection.
$217.94 per permit
$280 per permit
100%
$217.90
$281.80
$(63.90)
10 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 77.32%
$(639)
$2,818
$2,179
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
242 Page 977 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
EXIST RESID STANDARD ENCROACH PRMT S-086
10 REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST ADMIN CUST SVCS COORD I/II 0.25 $19.65 10 $197 PUBLIC WORKS ENG DEV TECH I/II 0.50 $38.04 10 $380 PUBLIC WORKS ASST DIR/PRIN/SR ENGINEER 0.50 $93.65 10 $937 PUBLIC WORKS PW INSPECTOR 1.00 $130.47 10 $1,305 $2,818 $281.81 2.25TYPE SUBTOTAL
$2,818 2.25TOTALS $281.80
243 Page 978 of 1234

S-087NON-STANDARD ENCROACH PLAN CHECK

PLANENGINEERING
Review of the plan for a Non-Standard Encroachment.

Actual Cost
$40 per plan plus charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs. 100%
$80.00
$225.00
$(145.00)
1 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 35.56%
$(145)
$225
$80
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
244 Page 979 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
NON-STANDARD ENCROACH PLAN CHECK S-087
1 REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PUBLIC WORKS ENG DEV TECH I/II 0.50 $38.04 1 $38 PUBLIC WORKS ASST DIR/PRIN/SR ENGINEER 1.00 $187.30 1 $187 $225 $225.34 1.50TYPE SUBTOTAL
$225 1.50TOTALS $225.00
245 Page 980 of 1234

S-088NON-STANDARD ENCROACH INSPECTION

PERMITENGINEERING
Inspection of the inspection of Non-Standard Encroachments. $500 deposit
Deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs. 100%
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
1 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
$0
$0
$0
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
246 Page 981 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
NON-STANDARD ENCROACH INSPECTION S-088
1 REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST

0.00 $0.00 0 $0
$0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$0 0.00TOTALS $0.00
247 Page 982 of 1234

S-089CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE/CORRECT.

APPLICATIONENGINEERING
Review a request for a Certificate of Compliance or Certificate of Correction to exempt the applicant from the Subdivision Map Act.
$1,000 deposit with charges at contract cost plus 20% for administration $1,000 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs. 100%
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
1 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
$0
$0
$0
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
248 Page 983 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE/CORRECT.S-089
1 REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST

0.00 $0.00 0 $0
$0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$0 0.00TOTALS $0.00
249 Page 984 of 1234

S-090PUBLIC WORKS PERMIT ISSUANCE

PERMITENGINEERING
Issuance of a Public Works permit.

Within One Year - $75.40
After One Year - $500 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs.

Within One Year - $95
After One Year - $1,000 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs.
100%
$74.79
$95.10
$(20.31)
123

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 78.64%
$(2,498)
$11,697
$9,199
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
250 Page 985 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
PUBLIC WORKS PERMIT ISSUANCE S-090
123
REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST ADMIN CUST SVCS COORD I/II 0.25 $19.65 123 $2,417 $2,417 $19.65 0.25TYPE SUBTOTAL
PUBLIC WORKS ENG DEV TECH I/II Within One Year 1.00 $76.07 122 $9,281 $9,281 $76.07 1.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
PUBLIC WORKS ENG DEV TECH I/II After 1 Year 0.00 $0.00 1 $0 $0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$11,697 1.25TOTALS $95.10
251 Page 986 of 1234

S-091WATER QUALITY MGMT PRELIM PLAN CHK

PLANENGINEERING
Preliminary review of a Water Quality Management Plan Review for compliance with City codes and standards. 0-10 acres - $4,211.13 per plan
Above 10 acres - $5,533.25 per plan
0-10 acres - $2,345 per plan
Above 10 acres - $3,465 per plan
100%
$4,475.60
$2,568.10
$1,907.50
10 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 174.28%
$19,075
$25,681
$44,756
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
252 Page 987 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
WATER QUALITY MGMT PRELIM PLAN CHK S-091
10 REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST ADMIN CUST SVCS COORD I/II 0.25 $19.65 10 $197 $197 $19.65 0.25TYPE SUBTOTAL
PUBLIC WORKS ENG DEV TECH I/II 0-10 Acres 1.00 $76.07 8 $609 PUBLIC WORKS ASST DIR/PRIN/SR ENGINEER 0-10 Acres 12.00 $2,247.60 8 $17,981 $18,589 $2,323.67 13.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
PUBLIC WORKS ENG DEV TECH I/II 10+ Acres 1.00 $76.07 2 $152 PUBLIC WORKS ASST DIR/PRIN/SR ENGINEER 10+ Acres 18.00 $3,371.40 2 $6,743 $6,895 $3,447.47 19.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$25,681 32.25TOTALS $2,568.10
253 Page 988 of 1234

S-092WATER QUALITY MGMT FINAL PLAN CHECK

PLANENGINEERING
Review of Final Water Quality Management Plans for compliance with City codes and standards. $441.05 per plan
0-10 acres - $1,855 per plan
Above 10 acres - $2,420 per plan
100%
$441.10
$1,969.90
$(1,528.80)
10 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 22.39%
$(15,288)
$19,699
$4,411
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
254 Page 989 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
WATER QUALITY MGMT FINAL PLAN CHECK S-092
10 REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST ADMIN CUST SVCS COORD I/II 0.25 $19.65 10 $197 $197 $19.65 0.25TYPE SUBTOTAL
PUBLIC WORKS ENG DEV TECH I/II 0-10 Acres 2.00 $152.14 8 $1,217 PUBLIC WORKS ASST DIR/PRIN/SR ENGINEER 0-10 Acres 9.00 $1,685.70 8 $13,486 $14,703 $1,837.84 11.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
PUBLIC WORKS ENG DEV TECH I/II 10+ Acres 2.00 $152.14 2 $304 PUBLIC WORKS ASST DIR/PRIN/SR ENGINEER 10+ Acres 12.00 $2,247.60 2 $4,495 $4,799 $2,399.74 14.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$19,699 25.25TOTALS $1,969.90
255 Page 990 of 1234

S-093PRELIM HYDROLOGY/HYDRAULIC STUDY

STUDYENGINEERING
Preliminary review of a Hydrology or Hydraulic study for compliance with City codes and standards.

None
0-10 acres - $2,345 per study
10-50 acres - $3.095 per study
50-100 acres - $3,840 per study
100+ acres - $4,590 per study
100%
$0.00
$2,824.93
$(2,824.93)
14 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
$(39,549)
$39,549
$0
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
256 Page 991 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
PRELIM HYDROLOGY/HYDRAULIC STUDY S-093
14 REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST ADMIN CUST SVCS COORD I/II 0.25 $19.65 14 $275 $275 $19.65 0.25TYPE SUBTOTAL
PUBLIC WORKS ENG DEV TECH I/II 0-10 Acres 1.00 $76.07 8 $609 PUBLIC WORKS ASST DIR/PRIN/SR ENGINEER 0-10 Acres 12.00 $2,247.60 8 $17,981 $18,589 $2,323.67 13.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
PUBLIC WORKS ENG DEV TECH I/II 11-50 Acres 1.00 $76.07 4 $304 PUBLIC WORKS ASST DIR/PRIN/SR ENGINEER 11-50 Acres 16.00 $2,996.80 4 $11,987 $12,291 $3,072.87 17.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
PUBLIC WORKS ENG DEV TECH I/II 51-100 Acres 1.00 $76.07 1 $76 PUBLIC WORKS ASST DIR/PRIN/SR ENGINEER 51-100 Acres 20.00 $3,746.00 1 $3,746 $3,822 $3,822.07 21.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
PUBLIC WORKS ENG DEV TECH I/II 100+ Acres 1.00 $76.07 1 $76 PUBLIC WORKS ASST DIR/PRIN/SR ENGINEER 100+ Acres 24.00 $4,495.20 1 $4,495 $4,571 $4,571.27 25.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$39,549 76.25TOTALS $2,824.93
257 Page 992 of 1234

S-094FINAL HYDROLOGY/HYDRAULIC STUDY

STUDYENGINEERING
Final review of a Hydrology or Hydraulic study for compliance with City codes and standards. 0-10 acres - $2,889.02 per study
10-50 acres - $4,211.13 per study
50-100 acres - $5,533.25 per study
100+ acres - $8,177.47 per study
0-10 acres - $2,345 per study
10-50 acres - $3,095 per study
50-100 acres - $3,840 per study
100+ acres - $4,590 per study
100%
$3,574.29
$2,824.93
$749.36
14 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 126.53%
$10,491
$39,549
$50,040
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
258 Page 993 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
FINAL HYDROLOGY/HYDRAULIC STUDY S-094
14 REFERENCE NO.

S-095STORMWATER POLLUTION PROTECT REVIEW

PLANENGINEERING
Review of Stormwater Pollution Protection Plan and construction inspection.

Plan Check:
0-10 acres - $4,211.13 per plan
Above 10 acres - $5,533.25 per plan
This fee should be removed from the fee schedule as the service is provided by the State. 100%
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
1 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
$0
$0
$0
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
260 Page 995 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
STORMWATER POLLUTION PROTECT REVIEW S-095
1 REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST

0.00 $0.00 0 $0
$0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$0 0.00TOTALS $0.00
261 Page 996 of 1234

S-096STORMWATER POST-CONSTRUCT INSPECT

INSPECTIONENGINEERING
Providing Stormwater NPDES Inspections and Post-Construction Water Quality Inspections for compliance with state and federal standards.

None
Charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs. 100%
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
1 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
$0
$0
$0
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
262 Page 997 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
STORMWATER POST-CONSTRUCT INSPECT S-096
1 REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST

0.00 $0.00 0 $0
$0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$0 0.00TOTALS $0.00
263 Page 998 of 1234

S-097SEWER CONNECTION/LATERAL INSPECTION

INSPECTIONENGINEERING
Inspection of a new Sewer connection and lateral.
$75 per inspection
Special Construction or Construction under unusual conditions - $65 per hour ($75 minimum) This fee should be removed as the service cost is already covered as part an encroachment permit. 100%
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
1 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
$0
$0
$0
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
264 Page 999 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
SEWER CONNECTION/LATERAL INSPECTION S-097
1 REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST

0.00 $0.00 0 $0
$0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$0 0.00TOTALS $0.00
265 Page 1000 of 1234

S-098LANDSCAPE PLAN CHECK

SHEETENGINEERING
Review of the plans for off-site or on-site common area landscaping, including three reviews. $411.09 per sheet
$95 per plan plus $560 per sheet
100%
$411.08
$657.63
$(246.55)
24 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 62.51%
$(5,917)
$15,783
$9,866
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
266 Page 1001 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
LANDSCAPE PLAN CHECK S-098
24 REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST ADMIN CUST SVCS COORD I/II 0.25 $19.65 24 $472 PUBLIC WORKS ENG DEV TECH I/II 1.00 $76.07 24 $1,826 PUBLIC WORKS ASST DIR/PRIN/SR ENGINEER 3.00 $561.90 24 $13,486 $15,783 $657.62 4.25TYPE SUBTOTAL
$15,783 4.25TOTALS $657.63
267 Page 1002 of 1234

S-099LANDSCAPE INSPECTION

PROJECTENGINEERING
Inspection of the construction of off-site or on-site common area landscaping.

Deposit of 50% of Engineers Estimate ($500 minimum)
Deposit of 50% of Engineers Estimate ($500 minimum)
100%
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
24 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
$0
$0
$0
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
268 Page 1003 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
LANDSCAPE INSPECTION S-099
24 REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST

0.00 $0.00 0 $0
$0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$0 0.00TOTALS $0.00
269 Page 1004 of 1234

S-100TRAFFIC STUDY REVIEW

REVIEWENGINEERING
Review of traffic study for conformance with City codes, regulations and standards. $1,000 deposit with charges at contract cost plus 20% for administration $2,000 deposit with charges at contract cost plus 20% for administration 100%
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
1 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
$0
$0
$0
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
270 Page 1005 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
TRAFFIC STUDY REVIEW S-100
1 REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST

0.00 $0.00 0 $0
$0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$0 0.00TOTALS $0.00
271 Page 1006 of 1234

S-101SCOPING AGREEMENT

AGREEMENTENGINEERING
Scoping agreement between the City and consultant.

None
$750 deposit with charges at contract cost plus 20% for administration 100%
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
1 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
$0
$0
$0
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
272 Page 1007 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
SCOPING AGREEMENT S-101
1 REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST

0.00 $0.00 0 $0
$0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$0 0.00TOTALS $0.00
273 Page 1008 of 1234

S-102TRANSPORTATION WIDE LOAD PERMIT

PERMITENGINEERING
Processing a Transportation Wide Load Permit.

Fees are set by the State:

Single - $16 per permit
Annual - $90 per permit
Fees are set by the State:

Single - $16 per permit
Annual - $90 per permit
80%
$16.00
$20.00
$(4.00)
1 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 80.00%
$(4)
$20
$16
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
274 Page 1009 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
TRANSPORTATION WIDE LOAD PERMIT S-102
1 REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST ADMIN CUST SVCS COORD I/II 0.25 $19.65 1 $20 $20 $19.65 0.25TYPE SUBTOTAL
$20 0.25TOTALS $20.00
275 Page 1010 of 1234

S-103HAUL ROUTE REVIEW

APPLICATIONENGINEERING
Review of the haul route for dirt/gravel trucks of a development.

None
$245 per application
100%
$0.00
$245.00
$(245.00)
1 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
$(245)
$245
$0
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
276 Page 1011 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
HAUL ROUTE REVIEW S-103
1 REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST ADMIN CUST SVCS COORD I/II 0.25 $19.65 1 $20 PUBLIC WORKS ENG DEV TECH I/II 0.50 $38.04 1 $38 PUBLIC WORKS ASST DIR/PRIN/SR ENGINEER 1.00 $187.30 1 $187 $245 $244.99 1.75TYPE SUBTOTAL
$245 1.75TOTALS $245.00
277 Page 1012 of 1234

S-104DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING DEPOSIT SVC

N/AENGINEERING
Review and inspection of Development Engineering Services with a deposit-based fee.

These fees are detailed in the various services with a deposit-based fee These fees are detailed in the various services with a deposit-based fee 100%
$360,000.00
$626,879.00
$(266,879.00)
1 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 57.43%
$(266,879)
$626,879
$360,000
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
278 Page 1013 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING DEPOSIT SVC S-104
1 REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN SVCS MGR 20% 327.84 $62,735.46 1 $62,735 PUBLIC WORKS CUST SVCS COORD I/II 15% 245.85 $15,980.25 1 $15,980 PUBLIC WORKS ENG DEV TECH I/II 5% 81.95 $6,233.94 1 $6,234 PUBLIC WORKS ASST DIR/PRIN/SR ENGINEER 14% Of 2.5 573.65 $107,444.65 1 $107,445 PUBLIC WORKS PW DIR/CITY ENGINEER 25% 407.71 $120,025.75 1 $120,026 PUBLIC WORKS PW INSPECTOR Remainder Of 1.5 2,076.72 $270,949.66 1 $270,950 PUBLIC WORKS SOLID WASTE & RECYCL MGR 20% 327.80 $43,508.89 1 $43,509 $626,879 $626,878.60 4,041.52TYPE SUBTOTAL
$626,879 4,041.52TOTALS $626,879.00
279 Page 1014 of 1234

S-105ENGINEERING EXTRA PLAN CHECK

REVIEWENGINEERING
Review of Engineering plans beyond the standard number of reviews.

Charges at contract cost plus 20% for administration
Charges at contract cost plus 20% for administration
100%
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
1 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
$0
$0
$0
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
280 Page 1015 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
ENGINEERING EXTRA PLAN CHECK S-105
1 REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST

0.00 $0.00 0 $0
$0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$0 0.00TOTALS $0.00
281 Page 1016 of 1234

S-106MISCELLANEOUS ENGINEERING SERVICES

REVIEWENGINEERING
Review of miscellaneous Engineering services or any service not included on the fee schedule.

Actual Cost
Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs plus 20% for administration.
100%
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
1 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
$0
$0
$0
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
282 Page 1017 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
MISCELLANEOUS ENGINEERING SERVICES S-106
1 REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST

0.00 $0.00 0 $0
$0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$0 0.00TOTALS $0.00
283 Page 1018 of 1234

S-107CODE ENFORCEMENT INSPECTION

HOURCODE ENFORCEMENT
Inspection of code enforcement issues after the second inspection or other issues not categorized.

None
$120 per hour
100%
$0.00
$122.00
$(122.00)
1 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
$(122)
$122
$0
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
284 Page 1019 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
CODE ENFORCEMENT INSPECTION S-107
1 REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST COMM ENHANCE QUAL OF LIFE OFFICER I/II 1.00 $122.00 1 $122 $122 $122.00 1.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$122 1.00TOTALS $122.00
285 Page 1020 of 1234

S-108INSPECTION WARRANT

WARRANTCODE ENFORCEMENT
Inspection of an abatement warrant due to the need to access the property.

None
Charge the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs. 100%
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
1 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
$0
$0
$0
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
286 Page 1021 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
INSPECTION WARRANT S-108
1 REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST

0.00 $0.00 0 $0
$0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$0 0.00TOTALS $0.00
287 Page 1022 of 1234

S-109ABATEMENT WARRANT

WARRANTCODE ENFORCEMENT
Processing of an abatement of a property due to the need to access the property.

None
Charge the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs. 100%
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
1 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
$0
$0
$0
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
288 Page 1023 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
ABATEMENT WARRANT S-109
1 REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST

0.00 $0.00 0 $0
$0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$0 0.00TOTALS $0.00
289 Page 1024 of 1234

S-110CODE ENFORCEMENT CITATION HEARING

HEARINGCODE ENFORCEMENT
Processing a hearing of an code enforcement complaint or issue at the property owner's request.

None
$500 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs. 100%
$0.00
$7,406.50
$(7,406.50)
2 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
$(14,813)
$14,813
$0
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
290 Page 1025 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
CODE ENFORCEMENT CITATION HEARING S-110
2 REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PLANNING COMM DEV DIR/DEPUTY CM 20.00 $6,186.60 2 $12,373 COMM ENHANCE QUAL OF LIFE OFFICER I/II 10.00 $1,220.00 2 $2,440 $14,813 $7,406.60 30.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$14,813 30.00TOTALS $7,406.50
291 Page 1026 of 1234

S-111ABANDONED PROP. INIT. REGISTRATION

PROPERTYCODE ENFORCEMENT
Processing the initial registration of an abandoned property within the City.

None
$185 per property
100%
$0.00
$183.00
$(183.00)
12 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
$(2,196)
$2,196
$0
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
292 Page 1027 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
ABANDONED PROP. INIT. REGISTRATION S-111
12 REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST COMM ENHANCE QUAL OF LIFE OFFICER I/II 1.50 $183.00 12 $2,196 $2,196 $183.00 1.50TYPE SUBTOTAL
$2,196 1.50TOTALS $183.00
293 Page 1028 of 1234

S-112ABANDONED PROPERTY MONTHLY INSPECT.

MONTHCODE ENFORCEMENT
Monthly reinspection of an abandoned property for the purpose of enforcing City codes.

None
$60 per month
100%
$0.00
$61.00
$(61.00)
12 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
$(732)
$732
$0
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
294 Page 1029 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
ABANDONED PROPERTY MONTHLY INSPECT.S-112
12 REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST COMM ENHANCE QUAL OF LIFE OFFICER I/II 0.50 $61.00 12 $732 $732 $61.00 0.50TYPE SUBTOTAL
$732 0.50TOTALS $61.00
295 Page 1030 of 1234

S-113WEED ABATEMENT

LOTCODE ENFORCEMENT
Abatement of the weeds on a lot due to non-compliance.
$125 plus actual cost of abatement
$245 plus actual cost of abatement
100%
$125.00
$244.00
$(119.00)
31 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 51.23%
$(3,689)
$7,564
$3,875
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
296 Page 1031 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
WEED ABATEMENT S-113
31 REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST COMM ENHANCE QUAL OF LIFE OFFICER I/II 2.00 $244.00 31 $7,564 $7,564 $244.00 2.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$7,564 2.00TOTALS $244.00
297 Page 1032 of 1234

S-114WEED ABATEMENT SUBSCRIPTION PROGRAM

LOTCODE ENFORCEMENT
Processing of request by property owner to participate in Weed Abatement Subscription program, in which the lost is automatically cleared of weeds.
$75 plus actual cost of abatement
$245 or 20% of abatement cost, whichever is less, plus actual cost of abatement 100%
$75.00
$244.00
$(169.00)
59 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 30.74%
$(9,971)
$14,396
$4,425
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
298 Page 1033 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
WEED ABATEMENT SUBSCRIPTION PROGRAM S-114
59 REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST COMM ENHANCE QUAL OF LIFE OFFICER I/II 2.00 $244.00 59 $14,396 $14,396 $244.00 2.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$14,396 2.00TOTALS $244.00
299 Page 1034 of 1234

S-115FIRE PLAN CHECK/INSPECTION

PLAN/PERMITFIRE
Review of Fire plans or inspections that are necessary due to the actions of the applicant.

See Appendix D for detail
See Appendix D for detail
100%
$93.59
$225.10
$(131.51)
1,762

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 41.58%
$(231,715)
$396,626
$164,911
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
300 Page 1035 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
FIRE PLAN CHECK/INSPECTION S-115
1,762
REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST FIRE PREVENTION Contract Svcs 0.00 $196.47 1,762 $346,180 PLANNING COMM DEV DIR/DEPUTY CM 10% 0.09 $28.63 1,762 $50,446 $396,626 $225.10 0.09TYPE SUBTOTAL
$396,626 0.09TOTALS $225.10
301 Page 1036 of 1234

S-116STORED VEHICLE RELEASE

RELEASEPOLICE
Release of a vehicle which was impounded.
$75 per release
$175 per release
100%
$75.00
$175.89
$(100.89)
575

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 42.64%
$(58,012)
$101,137
$43,125
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
302 Page 1037 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
STORED VEHICLE RELEASE S-116
575
REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST POLICE PD SERGEANT 0.50 $141.40 575 $81,305 POLICE SUPPORT SUPPORT SVCS SPEC I/II 0.33 $34.49 575 $19,832 $101,137 $175.89 0.83TYPE SUBTOTAL
$101,137 0.83TOTALS $175.89
303 Page 1038 of 1234

S-117STORED VEHICLE RELEASE - DUI

RELEASEPOLICE
Collection and release of a vehicle impounded for DUI by the City. $150 per release
$290 per release
100%
$150.00
$290.76
$(140.76)
25 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 51.59%
$(3,519)
$7,269
$3,750
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
304 Page 1039 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
STORED VEHICLE RELEASE - DUI S-117
25 REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST POLICE PD OFFICER 1.25 $248.03 25 $6,201 POLICE SUPPORT PUBL SAFT DISPATCHER I/II 0.08 $8.23 25 $206 POLICE SUPPORT SUPPORT SVCS SPEC I/II 0.33 $34.49 25 $862 $7,269 $290.75 1.66TYPE SUBTOTAL
$7,269 1.66TOTALS $290.76
305 Page 1040 of 1234

S-118VIN VERIFICATION

VEHICLEPOLICE
Processing a request to verify the vehicle identification number (VIN) of a vehicle at the request of the vehicle owner.
$15 per vehicle
$60 per vehicle
100%
$15.00
$58.45
$(43.45)
11 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 25.66%
$(478)
$643
$165
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
306 Page 1041 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
VIN VERIFICATION S-118
11 REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST POLICE PD OFFICER 0.25 $50.10 11 $551 POLICE SUPPORT SUPPORT SVCS SPEC I/II 0.08 $8.36 11 $92 $643 $58.46 0.33TYPE SUBTOTAL
$643 0.33TOTALS $58.45
307 Page 1042 of 1234

S-119TRAFFIC CITATION SIGN OFF

CITATIONPOLICE
Review the sign-off of a correctable failure citation.
$15 per citation
$25 per citation
100%
$15.00
$23.71
$(8.71)
7 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 63.25%
$(61)
$166
$105
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
308 Page 1043 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
TRAFFIC CITATION SIGN OFF S-119
7 REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST POLICE PD OFFICER 0.08 $15.29 7 $107 POLICE SUPPORT SUPPORT SVCS SPEC I/II 0.08 $8.36 7 $59 $166 $23.65 0.16TYPE SUBTOTAL
$166 0.16TOTALS $23.71
309 Page 1044 of 1234

S-120POLICE ALARM LICENSE

LICENSEPOLICE
Registering the contact information of a commercial or private burglary alarm. $21 per license
$28 per license
100%
$21.00
$27.90
$(6.90)
1,500

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 75.27%
$(10,350)
$41,850
$31,500
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
310 Page 1045 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
POLICE ALARM LICENSE S-120
1,500
REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST POLICE Contract Svcs 0.00 $5.40 1,500 $8,100 POLICE SUPPORT PIO/SPECIAL PROJ ANALYST 2 Hours/Week 0.07 $14.14 1,500 $21,210 POLICE SUPPORT SUPPORT SVCS SPEC I/II 0.08 $8.36 1,500 $12,540 $41,850 $27.90 0.15TYPE SUBTOTAL
$41,850 0.15TOTALS $27.90
311 Page 1046 of 1234

S-121AUTO REPOSSESSION PROCESSING

VEHICLEPOLICE
Processing the notice of an auto repossession.

None
Fee is set by State law:
$15 per vehicle
80%
$0.00
$19.00
$(19.00)
1 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
$(19)
$19
$0
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
312 Page 1047 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
AUTO REPOSSESSION PROCESSING S-121
1 REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST POLICE SUPPORT PUBL SAFT DISPATCHER I/II 0.18 $18.52 1 $19 $19 $18.52 0.18TYPE SUBTOTAL
$19 0.18TOTALS $19.00
313 Page 1048 of 1234

S-122SECOND HAND DEALER LICENSE

APPLICATIONPOLICE
Review of a request to operate a new pawn shop or secondhand store in the City. $107 per application
$235 per application
100%
$107.00
$233.43
$(126.43)
7 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 45.84%
$(885)
$1,634
$749
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
314 Page 1049 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
SECOND HAND DEALER LICENSE S-122
7 REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST POLICE PD SERGEANT 0.67 $189.47 7 $1,326 POLICE SUPPORT SUPPORT SVCS SPEC I/II 0.42 $43.89 7 $307 $1,634 $233.36 1.09TYPE SUBTOTAL
$1,634 1.09TOTALS $233.43
315 Page 1050 of 1234

S-123FORTUNETELLER PERMIT

APPLICATIONPOLICE
Review of a request to operate a fortuneteller business in the City. $240 per application per year
$540 per application per year
100%
$240.00
$542.00
$(302.00)
1 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 44.28%
$(302)
$542
$240
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
316 Page 1051 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
FORTUNETELLER PERMIT S-123
1 REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST POLICE PD SERGEANT 1.67 $472.26 1 $472 POLICE SUPPORT SUPPORT SVCS SPEC I/II 0.67 $70.02 1 $70 $542 $542.28 2.34TYPE SUBTOTAL
$542 2.34TOTALS $542.00
317 Page 1052 of 1234

S-124MASSAGE TECHNICIAN PERMIT - NEW

APPLICATIONPOLICE
Review of a request to operate as a massage technician in the City who is not state certified. $100 per application
$540 per application
100%
$100.00
$542.00
$(442.00)
1 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 18.45%
$(442)
$542
$100
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
318 Page 1053 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
MASSAGE TECHNICIAN PERMIT - NEW S-124
1 REFERENCE NO.

S-125MASSAGE TECHNICIAN PERMIT - RENEWAL

RENEWALPOLICE
Review a request to renew a massage technician and continue operation in the City. $100 per renewal
$45 per renewal
100%
$100.00
$44.00
$56.00
1 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 227.27%
$56
$44
$100
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
320 Page 1055 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
MASSAGE TECHNICIAN PERMIT - RENEWAL S-125
1 REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST POLICE SUPPORT SUPPORT SVCS SPEC I/II 0.42 $43.89 1 $44 $44 $43.89 0.42TYPE SUBTOTAL
$44 0.42TOTALS $44.00
321 Page 1056 of 1234

S-126MASSAGE ESTABLISHMENT PERMIT

APPLICATIONPOLICE
Conduct background check for a massage parlor business owner in order to preserve and insure the public peace, health, safety, and welfare.
$101 per application, annually
$225 per application, annually
100%
$101.00
$224.00
$(123.00)
10 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 45.09%
$(1,230)
$2,240
$1,010
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
322 Page 1057 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
MASSAGE ESTABLISHMENT PERMIT S-126
10 REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST POLICE PD SERGEANT 0.67 $189.47 10 $1,895 POLICE SUPPORT SUPPORT SVCS SPEC I/II 0.33 $34.49 10 $345 $2,240 $223.96 1.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$2,240 1.00TOTALS $224.00
323 Page 1058 of 1234

S-127ADULT ORIENTED ESTABLISHMENT PERMIT

APPLICATIONPOLICE
Conduct background check for either a adult oriented establishment business or entertainer order to preserve and insure the public peace, health, safety, and welfare.
$424 per application, annually
$985 per application, annually
100%
$424.00
$983.00
$(559.00)
1 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 43.13%
$(559)
$983
$424
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
324 Page 1059 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
ADULT ORIENTED ESTABLISHMENT PERMIT S-127
1 REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST POLICE PD SERGEANT 3.17 $896.44 1 $896 POLICE SUPPORT SUPPORT SVCS SPEC I/II 0.83 $86.74 1 $87 $983 $983.18 4.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$983 4.00TOTALS $983.00
325 Page 1060 of 1234

S-128TOBACCO RETAILER PERMIT

APPLICATIONPOLICE
Permitting and inspection of businesses selling tobacco products within the City. $250 per application
$985 per application
100%
$250.00
$983.00
$(733.00)
1 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 25.43%
$(733)
$983
$250
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
326 Page 1061 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
TOBACCO RETAILER PERMIT S-128
1 REFERENCE NO.

S-129GRAFFITI IMPLEMENTATION SALE PERMIT

APPLICATIONPOLICE
Conduct background check for graffiti implementation sales service provider within the City. $25 per application
$140 per application
100%
$25.00
$141.00
$(116.00)
1 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 17.73%
$(116)
$141
$25
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
328 Page 1063 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
GRAFFITI IMPLEMENTATION SALE PERMIT S-129
1 REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST POLICE PD SERGEANT 0.50 $141.40 1 $141 $141 $141.40 0.50TYPE SUBTOTAL
$141 0.50TOTALS $141.00
329 Page 1064 of 1234

S-130TOW YARD INSPECTION

INSPECTIONPOLICE
Review and inspection of a request to operate a tow truck business within the City. $143 per inspection
$355 per inspection
100%
$143.00
$353.33
$(210.33)
3 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 40.47%
$(631)
$1,060
$429
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
330 Page 1065 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
TOW YARD INSPECTION S-130
3 REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST POLICE PD SERGEANT 1.25 $353.49 3 $1,060 $1,060 $353.49 1.25TYPE SUBTOTAL
$1,060 1.25TOTALS $353.33
331 Page 1066 of 1234

S-131PEDDLER SOLICITOR PERMIT

PERSONPOLICE
Processing a request for a peddler solicitor permit within the City. $50 per person, annually
$180 per person, annually
100%
$50.00
$180.27
$(130.27)
15 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 27.74%
$(1,954)
$2,704
$750
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
332 Page 1067 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
PEDDLER SOLICITOR PERMIT S-131
15 REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST POLICE PD SERGEANT 0.33 $93.51 15 $1,403 POLICE SUPPORT SUPPORT SVCS SPEC I/II 0.83 $86.74 15 $1,301 $2,704 $180.25 1.16TYPE SUBTOTAL
$2,704 1.16TOTALS $180.27
333 Page 1068 of 1234

S-132BINGO PERMIT

APPLICATIONPOLICE
Processing a request for a Bingo operation within the City. $50 per application
Remote Caller Game - $465 per permit
Other - $50 per application (limited by State law)
10%
$50.00
$463.00
$(413.00)
2 CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 10.80%
$(826)
$926
$100
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

September 5, 2022
334 Page 1069 of 1234

September 5, 2022

CITY OF BEAUMONT
FY 2021/22

COST DETAIL WORKSHEET

SERVICE
BINGO PERMIT S-132
2 REFERENCE NO.

TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST POLICE PD SERGEANT 1.33 $376.11 2 $752 POLICE SUPPORT SUPPORT SVCS SPEC I/II 0.83 $86.74 2 $173 $926 $462.85 2.16TYPE SUBTOTAL
$926 2.16TOTALS $463.00
335 Page 1070 of 1234

Beaumont City CouncilMarch 7, 2023

Beaumont City Council
March 7, 2023