Beaumont City Council
May 21, 2024

General Plan Policy
Applicability
natural vegetation and habitats. Prohibited plant species are also identified to protect native habitats within and surrounding the Project due to their flammability or invasive nature. As such, the Project would not conflict with General Plan Policy

8.5.3. Policy 8.5.7: Discourage the use of plant
species on the California Invasive Plant
Inventory.

No Conflict. See Project Consistency response to General Plan Policy 8.5.3. The Project Applicant would incorporate plants identified within the Project's landscape plan and plant species list identified in the Specific Plan. Prohibited plant species are also identified to protect native habitats within and surrounding the Project due to their flammability or invasive nature. As such, the Project would not conflict with General Plan Policy

8.5.7. Goal 8.6: A City that protects and enhances its scenic vistas and views.

Policy 8.6.1: Protect and preserve
existing, signature view of the hills and
mountains from the City.

No Conflict. The Project site is within the Timoteo Badlands, which is characterized with mountainous terrain. The Project site's northwestern and southern portions contain ridges, canyons, and hillsides that are visible from Frontage Road and SR -60. The Project's proposed buildings would be built to a maximum height of 60 feet and therefore would be mainly visible from the SR -60. Landform modifications would occur under the Project in PAs 1-8 and remedial grading would occur in PA 9, along with landscaped, manufactured slopes, fuel modification areas, project signage, as well as the natural slopes which form a buffer between the Specific Plan's
developed areas and PA 10. Although landforms in mid -ground views would be altered for the development, the Project Applicant does not propose to develop the northwestern or southern portions of the Project site, which would preserve distant ridgeline views. As such, public views to the site's natural features would continue to be provided from the immediate surrounding area. Additionally, due to the location and orientation of the Project's proposed buildings and signage, views to San Bernardino Mountains, San Gorgonio Mountains, and San Jacinto Mountains would not be obstructed. As such, the Project would not conflict with General Plan Policy 8.6.1.

Policy 8.6.3: Require the preparation of a
grading analysis on hillside development
to pre -determine where development
should occur to minimize the impact of
new development on views of the City's
hillsides.

Policy 8.6.4: When grading is necessary,
encourage grading for new development
No Conflict. The Project's grading plan would be in
accordance with the standards identified in the City's
Municipal Code, to minimize the potential for erosion,
landslides, and other forms of land failure and preserve views of ridges, canyons, and hillsides. Future development
accommodated by the Specific Plan would be subjected to the recommendations contained in the Geotechnical Report (see Section 5 of Technical Appendix F1, of this EIR), in
accordance with the CBC and Beaumont Municipal Code
Section 17.1.040. Mandatory compliance with the

General Plan Policy
Applicability
that complements the surrounding natural
features.
recommendations contained within the Project site's
Geotechnical Report (as required by the CBSC, Beaumont
Building Code, and conditions of approval) would ensure that the Project is engineered and constructed to maximize stability and preclude safety hazards to on -site and abutting off -site areas. Moreover, although landforms in mid -ground views would be altered for the development, the Project would preserve foreground landforms along the SR -60 Freeway and distant ridgeline view. The boundary between PA 9 and PA 10 is designated as the "Limits of Disturbance" on the Land Use Plan, meaning that no grading, fuel management or
development activities will occur beyond the location of that line. As such, the Project would not conflict with General Plan Policies 8.6.3 and 8.6.4.

Policy 8.6.6: Limit light pollution from
outdoor sources, especially in rural
hillside and mountain areas, and open
spaces, to maintain darkness for night sky
viewing.

No Conflict. The Project's proposed outdoor lighting would be in accordance with the standards established in City of Beaumont Municipal Code Chapter 8.50 (Outdoor Lighting
Ordinance) to limit light pollution. As such, the Project would not conflict with General Plan Policy 8.6.6.

Goal 8.7: A City where open space is preserved and used for resource conservation and/or recreation.

Policy 8.7.6: Preserve permanent open
space edges or greenbelts that provide a
buffer for separation between adjoining
developments.

No Conflict. See Project Consistency response to General Plan Policy 3.1.12. The Project Applicant proposes to preserve 124.7 acres on site as Open Space and 152.4 acres as Open Space - Conservation. The location of the Open Space and Open Space - Conservation areas provide permanent preserve open space edges and provide a buffer from the proposed development to the MSHCP conserved lands to the south and west of the Project site and to the adjacent 60 Freeway.

Therefore, the Project would not conflict with General Plan Policy 8.7.6.

Goal 8.8: A City where the natural and visual character of the community is preserved.

Policy 8.8.1: Promote the maintenance of
No Conflict. Under existing conditions, the Project site is within the jurisdiction of the County of Riverside but is designated for Rural Residential. The Project Applicant proposes to modify the Project site's designation from Rural Residential uses to Industrial, General Commercial, Open Space, and Open Space - Conservation. The Project Applicant proposes to designate the central portion of the Project site as Industrial and General Commercial. The remaining portions of the Project site would be designated as Open Space and Open Space - Conservation. The Project Applicant does not propose to develop the areas designated as Open Space and Open Space - Conservation. These areas would be retained as open space.

See Project Consistency response to General Plan Policy 8.8.3. open space through the implementation of
the General Plan.

Policy 8.8.2: Protect and preserve open
space and natural habitat wherever
possible.

General Plan Policy
Applicability
Therefore, the Project would not conflict with General Plan Policies 8.8.1 and 8.8.2.

Policy 8.8.3: Work with Riverside County
and adjacent cities, landowners, and
conservation organizations to preserve,
protect, and enhance open space, and
No Conflict. The Project requires a Criteria Refinement to approve the Specific Plan, as designed, to be consistent with the MSHCP Reserve Assembly requirements. The Project
designates approximately 152.4 acres as Open Space -
Conservation within the southern portion of the Project site which is intended to be dedicated to the RCA, pursuant to the Western Riverside County MSHCP, for preservation to
augment existing, adjacent conserved lands in this part of Riverside County. The Project Applicant does not propose to disturb the areas designated as Open Space - Conservation. The Project Applicant would preserve this area and retain the natural resources. Therefore, the Project would not conflict with General Plan Policy 8.8.3.
natural resources consistent with the
MSHCP.

Policy 8.8.6: Establish buffers between
open space areas and urban development
by encouraging less intensive rural
development within proximity to the open
space areas.

No Conflict. See Project Consistency response to General Plan Policy 3.12.12. Therefore, the Project would not conflict with General Plan Policy 8.8.6.

Goal 8.9: A City where the extent of urban development in the hillsides is minimized and mitigated.

Policy 8.9.2: Limit the extent and
intensity of uses and development in areas
of unstable terrain, steep terrain, scenic
vistas, and other critical environmental
areas.

No Conflict. The Project site is within the San Timoteo Badlands, which is characterized with mountainous terrain. The Project site contains hillsides, ridges, canyons, and valleys in the northwestern and southeastern portions of the site which per below will be preserved. These areas include PAs 9 and 10 which are designated as Open Space and Open Space -
Conservation, respectively. Areas designated as Open Space - Conservation would serve to protect the natural resources on site and no development would occur in this area. As
previously discussed, grading would occur on PAs 1 through 9.

Landform modifications would occur under the Project in PAs 1-8 and remedial grading would occur in PA 9, along with landscaped, manufactured slopes, fuel modification areas, project signage, as well as the natural slopes which form a buffer between the Specific Plan's developed areas and PA 10.

Although landforms in mid -ground views would be altered for the development, no grading would occur within PA 10 or between the north-northeast property line and SR -60 Freeway, which would preserve foreground landforms along the SR -60 Freeway and distant ridgeline views. The boundary between

General Plan Policy
Applicability
PA 9 and PA 10 is designated as the "Limits of Disturbance" on the Land Use Plan. This designation means that all
development activity will take place inside of the limits of disturbance (i.e., within PA 9 or within PAs 1-8) and not on PA

10. As discussed in Section 4.7, Geology and Soils, geotechnical observation and testing shall be conducted during various stages of grading to avoid geological hazards associated with unstable soils. Mandatory adherence to the recommendations contained in the site -specific geotechnical report during Project construction would ensure impacts associated with geological hazards reduce to a less than significant level. Moreover, as discussed in Threshold a in Section 4.1, Aesthetics, impacts to scenic vistas would be less than significant. Therefore, the Project would not conflict with General Plan Policy 8.9.2.

Policy 8.9.3: Control land grading to
minimize the potential for erosion,
landsliding, and other forms of land
failure, as well as to limit the potential
negative aesthetic impact of excessive
modification of natural landforms.

No Conflict. The Project's grading plan would be in
accordance with the standards identified in the City's
Municipal Code, to minimize the potential for erosion,
landslides, and other forms of land failure. Mandatory
adherence to the recommendations contained in the site - specific geotechnical report (see Section 5 of Technical Appendix F1, of this EIR) during Project construction would ensure impacts associated with geological hazards reduce to a less than significant level.

Although landforms in mid -ground views would be altered for the development, the Project Applicant does not propose to grade the northwestern or southern portions of the Project site within PA 10 or between the north-northeast property line and SR -60 Freeway. The Project would preserve the natural on -site landforms in PA 10, which would preserve foreground
landforms along the SR -60 Freeway and distant ridgeline views. The Project's on -site Open Space designated areas would provide a buffer between the proposed development and adjoining natural open space. As such, the Project would not conflict with General Plan Policy 8.9.3.

Policy 8.9.4: Recognize the value of
ridgelines and hillsides as significant
natural and visual resources and
strengthen their role as features which
define the character of the City and its
individual neighborhood.

No Conflict. The Project would implement measures related to the City of Beaumont to ensure that Project design elements visually enhance and do not degrade the surrounding area. As discussed under Threshold a, the Project's proposed structures, which would reach a maximum height of 60 are not anticipated to block views to the San Gorgonio Mountains, San Bernardino Mountains, and San Jacinto Mountains. Additionally, the Project's proposed Open Space and Open Space - Conservation land uses would ensure that the Project site's existing hillsides, ridges, canyons, and valleys are preserved and retain their rural character. Although landforms in mid -ground views would be altered for the development, the Project would not allow grading within PA 10 or between the north-northeast property

General Plan Policy
Applicability
line and SR -60 Freeway, which would preserve foreground landforms along the SR -60 Freeway and distant ridgeline views. As such, the Project would not conflict with General Plan Policy 8.9.4.

Goal 8.10: A City that promotes the protection of biological resources Policy 8.10.1: Work with landowners and
government agencies in promoting
development concepts that are sensitive to
the environment and consider the
preservation of natural habitats and further
the conservation goals of the MSHCP.

No Conflict. The Open Space — Conservation area would be preserved as natural habitat and dedicated to the RCA as required by the MSHCP. Additionally, the Project Applicant has prepared a Criteria Refinement analysis demonstrating that the proposed Criteria Refinement would be at least equivalent to the existing Criteria as it applies to Effects on Habitats, Effects on Covered Species, Effects on Core Areas, Effects on Linkages and Constrained Linkages, Effects on Non -
Contiguous Habitat Blocks, Effects on MSHCP Conservation Area Configuration and Management, Effects on Ecotones, and Acreage Contributed to the MSHCP Conservation Area.

Therefore, the Project would not conflict with General Plan Policy 8.10.1.

Policy 8.10.2: Work with landowners and
government agencies in identifying areas
within the City of Beaumont and its SOI
that should be preserved as open space for
passive recreation, resource management,
or public safety and which meet the City's
preservation obligations per the MSHCP.

No Conflict. See Project Consistency response to General Plan Policy 8.10.1. Moreover, the Project would conserve 133.62 acres of replacement lands, including 0.32 acre of chaparral,

45.85 acres of Riversidean sage scrub, 86.03 acres of non - native grassland, and 0.22 acre of southern riparian scrub consistent with the MSHCP (PDF 4-1). Therefore, the Project would not conflict with General Plan Policy 8.10.2.

Policy 8.10.4: Preserve significant habitat
and environmentally sensitive areas,
including hillsides, rock outcroppings, and
viewsheds through the application of the
Hillside Ordinance Policies.

No Conflict. See Project Consistency response to General Plan Policy 8.6.1. As discussed in Section 4.4, Biological Resources, through the Project's participation in the MSHCP, impacts to sensitive vegetation communities would be less than
significant. Additionally, implementation of Mitigation Measures MM 4.4-1 through 4.4-5 would reduce the Project's impacts to significant habitat and environmentally sensitive areas to less than significant levels. Therefore, the Project would not conflict with General Plan Policy 8.10.4.

Policy 8.10.5: Require project proponents
to hire a CDFW-qualified biologist or
monitor for special status species or other
wildlife of low or limited mobility. If
present, prior to and during all ground-
and habitat -disturbing activities, move out
of harm's way special status species or
other wildlife of low or limited mobility
that would otherwise be injured or killed.

No Conflict. As discussed in Section 4.4, Biological
Resources, the Project would crotch bumble bee, coastal California gnatcatcher, burrowing owl, and nesting birds.

Implementation of Mitigation Measures MMs 4.4-1 through

4.4-3, and 4.4-5 would require pre -construction surveys conducted by a qualified biologist prior to initial ground - disturbing activities (including vegetation clearing, clearing and grubbing, tree removal, site watering, equipment staging, grading, etc.). If species are present during the survey, measures would be taken to avoid impacts to the sensitive species either through relocation or establishment of buffer

General Plan Policy
Applicability
areas. Therefore, the Project would not conflict with General Plan Policy 8.10.5.

Goal 8.11: A City where archaeological, cultural resources, tribal cultural resources, and historical places are identified, recognized, and preserved.

Policy 8.11.1: Avoid or when avoidance is
not feasible, minimize impacts to sites
with significant archaeological,
paleontological, cultural, and tribal
cultural resources, to the extent feasible.

No Conflict. As discussed in Section 4.5, Cultural Resources, there are no known prehistoric archeological resources present on the Project site. However, Mitigation Measure MM 4.5-2 would ensure the proper identification and subsequent
treatment of any significant archaeological resources that may be encountered during ground -disturbing activities.

Additionally, as discussed in Section 4.7, Geology and Soils, the Project site is identified as within an area of "High" Paleontological Sensitivity; however, implementation of Mitigation Measures MM 4.7-1 through 4.7-3 would ensure the proper identification and subsequent treatment of any
significant paleontological resources that may be encountered during ground -disturbing activities.

Similarly, as discussed in Section 4.18, Tribal Cultural Resources, although there are no tribal cultural resources are known to occur within the Project site, Mitigation Measures MM 4.18-1 through MM 4.18-3 would ensure impacts to tribal cultural resources would be reduced to less than significant levels. Therefore, the Project would not conflict with General Plan Policy 8.11.1.

Policy 8.11.2: Comply with notification of
California Native American tribes and
organization of proposed projects that
have the potential to adversely impact
cultural resources, per the requirements of
AB 52 and SB 18.

No Conflict. As discussed in Section 4.18, Tribal Cultural Resources, the City of Beaumont sent notification to the Native American tribes with possible traditional or cultural affiliation to the area that previously requested consultation pursuant to AB 52 and SB 18 requirements. Of the tribes that were sent notifications letters, three requested consultation—Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians, Morongo Band of Mission Indians, and Soboba Band of Mission Indians. In a letter dated December 15, 2020, the Augustine Band of Cahuilla Mission Indians stated that they were unaware of specific cultural resources that may be affected by the Project but would like to be notified in the event cultural resources are discovered during development.

The City conducted telephone consultations with Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians, Morongo Band of Mission Indians, and Soboba Band of Mission Indians. Mitigation Measure MM

4.18-1 would reduce impacts associated with the unanticipated discovery of tribal cultural resources to less than significant.

Therefore, the Project would not conflict with General Plan Policy 8.11.2.

General Plan Policy
Applicability
Policy 8.11.4: Require that any human
remains discovered during
implementation of public and private
project within the City be treated with
respect and dignity and fully comply with
the California Native American Graves
Protection and Reparation Act, California
Public Resources Code Amended Status
1982 Chapter 1492, California Public
Resources Code Statues 2006, Chapter
863, Section 1, CA Health and Safety
Code Section 7050.5, Public Resources
Code Section 5097.98, Public Resources
Code Section 5097.94, SB 447 (Chapter
404, Statues of 1987) and other
appropriate laws.

No Conflict. As discussed in Section 4.5, Cultural Resources, the Project would be required to comply with the applicable provisions of California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 and California Public Resources Code Section 5097 et seq.

Mandatory compliance with State law would ensure that human remains, if encountered, are appropriately treated, and would preclude the potential for significant impacts to human remains.

Therefore, the Project would not conflict with General Plan Policy 8.11.4.

Safety (Chapter 9)
Goal 9.2: A City with improved community safety and reduced opportunities for criminal activity through appropriate physical design.

Policy 9.2.1: Implement Crime Prevention
Through Environmental Design (CPTED)
principles with:
• Site design techniques that
maximize natural surveillance and
reduce the potential for criminal
activity.
• Policies and regulations that
encourage a mixture of
compatible land uses to promote
visibility and higher levels of
activity and increased the safety of
public use areas and of pedestrian
travel.
• Improve lighting and nighttime
security across all City
neighborhoods, especially in
existing or potential crime
problem areas.
• Involve the City's Police
Department in the development
review process for evaluation of
building and site plan
No Conflict. See Project Consistency response to General Plan Policy 3.9.1. The Project would result in the development of the Project site with Industrial and General Commercial uses.

The implementation of the Project would provide a clean delineation between public and private space through signage, walls, and fencing. The Project's proposed buildings would feature security lighting to enhance security on site.

Additionally, building facades would face public roadways including SR -60 Freeway, Jack Rabbit Trail, Entertainment Way, and 4th Street. Therefore, the Project would not conflict with General Plan Policy 9.2.1.

General Plan Policy
Applicability
vulnerabilities to criminal
activities, especially for public
areas within developments.

Goal 9.4: A City that is protected from the effects of natural and man-made disasters.

Policy 9.4.5: Require new development to
provide access roads that allow both safe
and efficient access of emergency
equipment and community evacuation.

No Conffict. During the course of the City of Beaumont's review of the Project, the City evaluated the Project's design, including but not limited to proposed driveway locations and parking lot/drive aisle configuration, to ensure that adequate access would be provided for emergency vehicles at Project build out. The Conceptual Circulation Plan (Figure 3-8) identifies a looped perimeter road system (4th Street and Industrial Way) along with a phased series of 40 -foot wide Interim Fire Access Loop Connections, to ensure adequate fire- fighting and emergency access, during construction and
operation of the site. Under operational conditions, the Project would be required by Riverside County Ordinance No. 348, Section 21.32a, to maintain adequate emergency access for emergency vehicles on site. In addition, the Project site design provides for adequate egress in case of emergency evacuation.

As discussed in Section 4.9, Hazards and Hazardous
Materials, and Section 4.20, Wildfire, the Project would not impair implementation of, or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan. Therefore, the Project would not conflict with General Plan Policy 9.4.5.

Goal 9.5: A City with enhanced fire and emergency response services.

Policy 9.5.5: Coordinate with the
Beaumont -Cherry Valley Water District
to ensure that water pressure for existing
and future developed areas is adequate for
firefighting purposes.

No Conflict. As discussed in Section 4.20, Wildfire, the Project would result in the installation of on -site fire hydrants, that are designed in accordance with the Riverside County Fire
Department standards in coordination with Beaumont -Cherry Valley Water District. The internal waterlines are anticipated to supply sufficient fire flows and pressure to meet the demands required for on -site fire hydrants. Therefore, the Project would not conflict with General Plan Policy 9.5.5.

Goal 9.6: A City that protects human life, land, and property from the effects of wildland fire hazards.

Policy 9.6.3: Ensure that development in
Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones
minimizes the risks of wildfire through
planning and design of structures in
accordance with the California Building
Code Chapter 7A. Ensure adequate
No Conffict. As discussed in Section 4.20, Wildfire, the Project site is designated within a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone (VHFHSZ) and High Fire Hazard Severity Zone within an SRA by the Riverside County General Plan and CalFire. The Project would implement on -site defensible space (fuel modification area [FMA] and fuel maintenance zone), which would consist of asphalt roadways, parking stalls, loading zones, irrigated landscaping, and irrigated slope protecting

General Plan Policy
Applicability
provisions for vegetation management,
emergency access, and firefighting.
landscaping to preclude wildfire impacts. Building materials will comply with any state building code requirements for buildings located in a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone and High Fire Hazard Severity Zone. Additionally, the Project would be required by the CBC and Beaumont Building Code to comply with the recommendations identified in the Project's Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation. Therefore, the Project would not conflict with General Plan Policy 9.6.3.

Policy 9.6.4: Require new development in
the High and Very High Fire Hazard
Severity Zones to develop a fire
protection and evacuation plan and ensure
that the plan includes adequate fire access
to new development.

No Conflict. As discussed in Section 4.20, Wildfire, the Project Fire Protection Plan was prepared that includes evacuation routes. The Project will provide a proactive educational component disclosing the potential wildfire risk and the requirements identified in the Project's Fire Protection Plan for Project businesses and occupants. This educational information must include maintaining the landscape and structural
component according to the appropriate standards and
embracing a "Ready, Set, Go!" stance on evacuation.

Therefore, the Project would not conflict with General Plan Policy 9.6.4.

Policy 9.6.6: Require property owners to
clear brush and high fuel vegetation and
maintain fire -safe zones (a minimum
distance of 30 feet from the structure of to
the property line, whichever is closer) to
reduce the risk of fires. For structures
located within the Very High Fire Hazard
Severity Zone, the required brush distance
is up to 200 feet from structures up to
their property line.

No Conflict. As discussed in Section 4.20, Wildfire, the Project would provide a fuel maintenance zone with 20 feet of irrigated vegetation around the perimeter of the Project site and a 100 - foot FMA of paved surface and/or irrigated landscape.

Therefore, the Project would not conflict with General Plan Policy 9.6.6.

Policy 9.6.7: Continue to enforce the
weed abatement ordinance to mitigate
potential fire hazard risks.

No Conflict. The Project would be required to comply with the weed abatement ordinance to reduce wildfire impacts.

Therefore, the Project would not conflict with General Plan Policy 9.6.7.

Policy 9.6.8: Require that developments
located in wildland interface areas
incorporate and enforce standards for
construction, including a fuel modification
program (i.e., brush clearance, planting of
fire -retardant vegetation) to reduce the
threat of wildfires.

No Conflict. As discussed in Section 4.20, Wildfire, the Project would incorporate FMA and fuel maintenance zone, which
would consist of asphalt roadways, parking stalls, loading zones, irrigated landscaping, and irrigated slope protecting landscaping. Vegetation management would also be
implemented as interim fuel management area throughout the construction phases for each structure as there may be a period if one or more years where developing phases are exposed on multiple sides to wildland fuels. Therefore, the Project would not conflict with General Plan Policy 9.6.8.

General Plan Policy
Applicability
1 Goal 9.7: A City that protects safety of human life, land, and property from the effects of earthquakes and geotechnical hazards.

Policy 9.7.1: As new versions of the
California Building Code (CCR Title 24,
published triennially) are released, adopt
and enforce the most recent codes that
contain the most recent seismic
requirements for structural design of new
development and redevelopment to
minimize damage from earthquakes and
other geologic activity.

No Conflict. As required in Regulatory Requirement RR 7-1, the Project shall comply with CBSC (Chapter 18) (adopted by the City of Beaumont as Municipal Code Section Chapter

15.04.010) and Municipal Code Section 17.11.040, which
requires development projects to evaluate and identify site - specific geologic and seismic conditions, and seismic
requirements for structural design. Therefore, the Project would not conflict with General Plan Policy 9.7.1.

Policy 9.7.5: Ensure that Building and
Safety agencies include thorough plan
checks and inspections of structures
vulnerable to seismic activity, fire risk,
and flood hazards. Additionally,
recommend the periodic observation of
construction by design professionals.

No Conflict. According to RCIT and FEMA, the Project site is within an area of minimal flooding (RCIT, 2021; FEMA,
2014). As further discussed under Threshold c of EIR Section

4.10, Hydrology and Water Quality, the Project would maintain a similar drainage pattern as compared to existing conditions. It should be noted that the overall development pad would be elevated by the proposed design grading to be situated above local drainage courses. As such, the risk of flooding is low. As discussed in Section 4.7, Geology and Soils, grading plan review is required to verify that the geotechnical requirements are updated specific to the detailed rough grading plans. Future development accommodated by the Specific Plan would be
required to have site -specific geotechnical investigation reports prepared by the Project applicant's/developer's geotechnical consultant, in accordance with the CBC and Beaumont
Municipal Code Section 17.1.040. The geotechnical
investigations would determine seismic design parameters for the site and the proposed building type per CBC requirements. mandatory compliance with the recommendations contained within the Project site's Geotechnical Report (as required by the CBSC, Beaumont Building Code, and conditions of
approval) would ensure that the Project is engineered and constructed to minimize seismic activity, fire risk, and flood hazards. Moreover, all structures would be protected by an automatic, internal fire sprinkler system. Fire sprinkler systems shall be in accordance with RCFD and National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) Standard 13. Fire sprinkler plans for each structure would be submitted and reviewed by RCFD for
compliance with the applicable fire and life safety regulations, codes, and ordinances as well as the RCFD Fire Prevention Standards for fire protection systems. Therefore, the Project would not conflict with General Plan Policy 9.7.5.

Goal 9.9: A City that promotes preparedness related to the adverse effects of high winds common in the Pass area.

General Plan Policy
Applicability
Policy 9.9.2: Require implementation of
best practices for dust control at all
excavation and grading projects.

No Conflict. The Project would be required to comply with South Coast AQMD Rule 403 (Fugitive Dust), which requires the implementation of best available dust control measures.

Therefore, the Project would not conflict with General Plan Policy 9.9.2.

Goal 9.10: A City that is prepared for the potential impacts of climate change.

Policy 9.10.2: Encourage new
development and redesign of existing
buildings to take steps to reduce the
impacts of extreme heat events, including:
• Design buildings to use less
mechanical heating and cooling
through use of passive solar
techniques.
• Support and incentivize, as
feasible, energy efficiency and
weatherization programs.
• Protect and expand the City's
urban tree canopy to provide
shade, increase carbon
sequestration, and pur ' the air.
• Provide shade structures in public
parks, outdoor playgrounds, and
bus shelters.

No Conflict. As discussed in Section 3.0, Project Description, of this EIR, the Project shall implement the County of
Riverside's 2019 Climate Action Plan (CAP) Screening Table Measures which include cool roofs, enhanced insulation, and energy efficient heating/cooling equipment, and on -site solar to provide 20% of the Project's energy requirements.

Additionally, as shown on Figure 3-14, Master Landscape Plan, streetscape landscaping presents a combination of evergreen and deciduous trees, low shrubs, and masses of groundcovers. Therefore, the Project would not conflict with General Plan Policy 9.10.2.

Policy 9.10.3: Require enhanced water
conservation measures in new
development and redesign of existing
buildings to address the possibility of
constrained future water supplies,
including:
• Compliance with existing
landscape water conservation
ordinance (Chapter 17.06 of the
Municipal Code).
• Use of water conservation
measures in new development
beyond current requirements.
• Installation of recycled water use
and graywater systems.

No Conflict. As disused in Section 4.19, Utilities and Service Systems, the Project would construct an on -site recycled water system. The Project would connect a proposed 14 -inch recycled water line that would connect to the existing 14 -inch recycled water line within the adjacent Hidden Canyon development at 4th Street. The Project will comply with CAP points for increased efficient use of water both inside the building and for landscaping irrigation. Additionally, the Project would be required to comply with Chapter 17.06 of the Municipal Code.

Therefore, the Project would not conflict with General Plan Policy 9.10.3.

General Plan Policy
Applicability
Goal 9.11: A City with minimized risk associated with hazardous materials.

Policy 9.11.2: Require an assessment of
hazardous materials use as part of
environmental review and/or include
approval of the development of a
hazardous management and disposal as a
condition of a project, subject to review
by the County Environmental Health
Department.

No Conflict. A Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) was prepared for the Project by McAlister GeoScience
(GeoScience), which identified the Project site's potential to contain hazardous materials. The results of the Phase I ESA are provided in EIR Section 4.9, Hazards and Hazardous
Materials. Additionally, heavy equipment (e.g., dozers, excavators, tractors) would be operated on the Project site during construction. This heavy equipment likely would be fueled and maintained by petroleum -based substances such as diesel fuel, gasoline, oil, and hydraulic fluid, which are considered hazardous if improperly stored or handled. In addition, materials such as paints, adhesives, solvents, and other substances typically used in building construction would be located on the Project site during construction. These materials would not be in such quantities or stored in such a manner as to pose a significant safety hazard to on -site construction workers or the general public
Based on the facilities and uses that would be allowed at the Project site, hazardous materials (e.g., diesel fuel, lubricants, solvents, corrosives, toxic substances hazardous materials, etc.) could be used during the course of daily operations at the Project site. As concluded in Section 4.9, Hazards and
Hazardous Materials, of this EIR, with mandatory regulatory compliance, the Project would not pose a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, storage, emission, or disposal of hazardous materials, nor would the Project increase the potential for accident conditions which could result in the release of hazardous materials into the environment. Therefore, the Project would not conflict with General Plan Policy 9.11.2.

Policy 9.11.5: Prohibit placement of
proposed new facilities that will be
involved in the production, use, storage,
transport, or disposal of hazardous
materials near existing sensitive land uses
(such as homes, schools, child-care
centers, nursing homes, senior housing,
etc.), that may be adversely affected by
such activities.

No Conflict. As concluded in Section 4.9, Hazards and
Hazardous Materials, of this EIR, with mandatory regulatory compliance, the Project would not pose a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, storage, emission, or disposal of hazardous materials, nor would the Project increase the potential for accident conditions which could result in the release of hazardous materials into the environment. Therefore, the Project would not conflict with General Plan Policy 9.11.5.

Noise (Chapter 10)
Goal 10.1: A City where noise exposure is minimized for those living and working in the community.

Policy 10.1.4: Incorporate noise
considerations into land use planning
No Conflict. As discussed in Section 4.13, Noise, Project traffic noise would exceed the City's applicable significance

General Plan Policy
Applicability
decisions. Require the inclusion of noise
mitigation measures, as may be necessary
to meet standards, in the design of new
development projects in the City.
threshold. The Project would result in a significant impact from traffic noise during Existing (2020) plus Project conditions, Opening Year (2023 and 2027) plus Project Conditions, and Horizon Year (2045) Plus Project Conditions for three roadway segments (#4, #5, and #6). Under Opening Year (2025) plus Project Conditions, the Project would result in a significant impact for one roadway segment (segment #6). Therefore, the Project -related off -site traffic noise level increases at adjacent noise -sensitive land uses are considered a significant impact.

Segments #4, #5, and #6 are located in industrial areas and are not located immediately adjacent to any noise sensitive land uses. This is consistent with the City's General Plan EIR that determined that buildout of the City's General Plan could result in new vehicular traffic which could exceed the FHWA
thresholds, and could substantially increase the ambient noise levels in the City and its SOI. The City's General Plan recognizes that an increase in noise levels will occur in industrial areas due to truck traffic. The City's General Plan goals and policies, therefore, are focused on protecting noise sensitive receptors from road noise, while encouraging timely and efficient goods movement that does not significantly contribute to noise in the City.

The Project's construction and operational (stationary) noise impacts would be less than significant. Therefore, the Project would not conflict with General Plan Policy 10.1.4.

Policy 10.1.5: Require project involving
new development or modifications to
existing development to implement
measures, where necessary, to reduce
noise levels to at least the normally
compatible range. Design measures
should focus on architectural features and
building design and construction, rather
than site design features, such as
excessive setbacks, berms, and sound
walls, to maintain compatibility with
adjacent and surrounding uses.

No Conflict. As discussed in Section 4.13, Noise, the Project's construction and operational (stationary) noise impacts would be less than significant. Therefore, the Project would not conflict with General Plan Policy 10.1.5.

Policy 10.1.6: Encourage reduction of
stationary noise impacts from commercial
and industrial land uses, activities, events,
and businesses on noise -sensitive land
uses.

No Conflict. As discussed in Section 4.13, Noise, the Project's operational (stationary) noise impacts would be less than significant. Project stationary noise would not expose nearby receivers to unacceptable daytime or nighttime noise levels during Project buildout. Therefore, the Project would not conflict with General Plan Policy 10.1.6.

Goal 10.2: A City with minimal mobile source -generated noise levels.

General Plan Policy
Applicability
Policy 10.2.3: Prohibit truck routes
through neighborhoods with sensitive
receptors, where feasible.

No Conflict. See Project Consistency response to General Plan Policy 3.10.4. Due to the Project site's proximity to SR -60, trucks accessing the Project site would efficiently reach the State highway system to facilitate the movement of goods throughout the region. The Project does not propose any truck routes in proximity to sensitive receptors. As such, the Project would not conflict with General Plan Policy 10.2.3.

Land Use (Chapter 11)
Goal 11.12: Encourage development to be efficient in the use of non-renewable resources, including water, energy, and air quality.

Policy 11.12.1: Promote the use of energy
and water conservation technologies and
practices.

Policy 11.12.3: Consider sustainable
development practices that reduce energy
and water demand.

No Conflict. The Project proposes conventional industrial uses reflecting contemporary energy efficient/energy conserving designs and operational programs. Energy efficiency/energy conservation attributes of the Project would be complemented by increasingly stringent State and federal regulatory actions addressing vehicle fuel economies and vehicle emissions standards; and enhanced building/utilities energy efficiencies mandated under California building codes (e.g., Title 24, California Green Building Standards Code). The Project would comply with Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations and proposes conventional industrial uses reflecting contemporary energy efficient/energy conserving designs and operational programs. Uses proposed by the Project are not inherently energy intensive, and the Project energy demands in total would be comparable to, or less than, other industrial projects of similar scale and configuration.

As disused in Section 4.19, Utilities and Service Systems, the Project would construct an on -site recycled water system. The Project would connect a proposed 14 -inch recycled water line that would connect to the existing 14 -inch recycled water line within the adjacent Hidden Canyon development at 4th Street.

Therefore, the Project would not conflict with General Plan Policies 1.12.1 and 11.12.3.

Policy 11.12.4: Ensure that new
development does not result in wind and
solar access impacts.

No Conflict. As shown in Table 4.8-6, 20% of the Project's energy consumption would be from solar consistent with the CAP requirement. Furthermore, the Project's architecture would include skylights and clerestory windows to allow for increased use of passive solar design and day -lighted in new structures. Therefore, the Project would not conflict with General Plan Policy 11.12.4.

Policy 11.12.6: Improve air quality
through improved walkability, reduced
No Conflict. The Project includes installation of sidewalks along the Project site's frontage with Jack Rabbit Trail and 4th

General Plan Policy
Applicability
vehicular use and enhanced non- vehicular
Street and along Industrial Way, a proposed private road travel.
located along the north side of the proposed industrial buildings. The Project Applicant proposes curb adjacent sidewalks and pedestrian paths to encourage and enhance pedestrian activity throughout the Project site. Additionally, the Project would include the installation of bicycle racks and lockers at each of the proposed light industrial buildings.

Therefore, the Project would not conflict with General Plan Policy 11.12.6.

RESOLUTION NO. 2024-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BEAUMONT,

CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A PLAN OF SERVICE AND ANNEXATION

REQUEST AND REQUESTING THE RIVERSIDE LOCAL AGENCY

FORMATION COMMISSION TO FAVORABLY CONSIDER ANNEXATION OF

THE SUBJECT PROPERTY
WHEREAS, the affected territory located on approximately 539.9 acres of land in the unincorporated area of the County of Riverside and set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein (the "Property") is in the Sphere of Influence (as such term is defined in Govt. Code Section 56076) of the City of Beaumont ("City") and is uninhabited; and
WHEREAS, the City desires that the Riverside County Formation Commission ("LAFCO") accept the Owner's application for annexation of the Property into the City and upon completion thereof take proceedings required for the annexation of the Property pursuant to the Cortese -Knox -Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000, commencing with Section 56000 of the California Government Code; WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Beaumont ("City Council") concurrently with the consideration of this Resolution has adopted Resolution No. certifying Final Environmental Impact Report SCH No.
2020099007 ("FEIR"), as supplemented by Supplemental CEQA Memorandum prepared by T&B Planning, Inc. dated March 4, 2024 which considers the pre -zoning of the Property and the annexation of the Property into the City; has adopted environmental findings pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, a Statement of Overriding Considerations and a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program; and has also adopted a General Plan Amendment, pre -zoning of the Property to specific plan, the Beaumont Pointe Specific Plan, a Sign Program and Vesting Tentative Parcel Map No. 38161 with respect to the Property.

WHEREAS, in connection with annexation the City desires to approve the Riverside County Local Agency Formation Commission Plan of Services for the Beaumont Pointe Specific Plan Project dated March 2024 prepared by T&B Planning, Inc. and the Beaumont Pointe Specific Plan Fiscal Impact Analysis dated August 2023 prepared for the City of Beaumont by Development Planning & Financing Group and upon application therefor by the owner of the Property and approval by LAFCO of the application, the City desires to annex the Property into the City of Beaumont consistent with this Resolution; and
WHEREAS, this proposal is consistent with the sphere of influence of the City; and WHEREAS, the Property shares a common boundary and is contiguous (as defined by Govt. Code §56031(a)) with the existing boundary of the City to the east and is surrounded to the south and west by open space within or to be dedicated by the Project to the Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority; and

WHEREAS, to the north of the Property and south of the City boundary lie the SR 60 freeway (Caltrans), the Norton Younglove Reserve (Riverside County Regional Park and Open -Space District) and a railroad right of way (collectively, the "SOI Open Space"), all of which land is within the sphere of influence of the City, is designated as Open Space on the City's General Plan Land Use Map and is not anticipated to be developed or to require services in the foreseeable future;
WHEREAS, annexation of the Property without the SOI Open Space is appropriate in that it will not affect the provision of services to the City or the Property as all services to the Property are to be provided by extension of 4th Street and would not be detrimental to the orderly development of the community, in that the SOI Open Space is separated from the Property by the SR 60 freeway; WHEREAS, the reasons for the proposed annexation are as follows:

This annexation is in the public interest, and that there will be a community benefit resulting from the amendment: (i) a plan of services has been prepared for the General Plan Amendment and provides operation and maintenance of community activities and events, public safety, transit, maintenance of public works, sanitary sewers and trash collections to insure that adequate public services and facilities are provided in a timely manner for the Property and the Project; (ii) it will provide for more efficient public service; and (iii) is compatible with surrounding land uses and is consistent with the existing industrial character of the area; and WHEREAS, it is desired to provide that the proposed annexation be subject to the following terms and conditions:

The annexation is subject to the provisions in the Plan of Service and LAFCO approval.

NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BEAUMONT DOES RESOLVE, DECLARE AND DETERMINE AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. That the City Council hereby approves the Riverside County Local Agency Formation Commission Plan of Services for the Beaumont Pointe Specific Plan Project dated March 2024 prepared by T&B Planning, Inc. ("Plan of Service") and the Beaumont Pointe Specific Plan Fiscal Impact Analysis dated August 2023 prepared for the City of Beaumont by Development Planning & Financing Group.

SECTION 2. That the City Council hereby consents to annexation of the Property described in Exhibit A into the City of Beaumont and recommends to the Riverside County Local Agency Formation Commission ("LAFCO") that it approve the annexation of the Property into the City upon application by the Property owner and subject to the provisions in the Plan of Service and the terms of the LAFCO approval and without requirement to annex the SOI Open Space.

SECTION 3. That LAFCO is hereby requested to take proceedings for the annexation, according to the terms and conditions stated above and in the manner provided by the Cortese -Knox -Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000.

SECTION 4. That this Resolution shall take effect immediately upon adoption by the City Council.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at the regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Beaumont, California, held on the 21st day of May, 2024, by the following roll call vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

CITY OF BEAUMONT CITY COUNCIL
David Fenn, Mayor
ATTEST:

Nicole Wheelwright, City Clerk

ORDINANCE NUMBER 2024 -

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BEAUMONT,

CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BY AND

BETWEEN THE CITY OF BEAUMONT AND BEAUMONT POINTE

PARTNERS, LLC
WHEREAS, City is a general law city and a municipal corporation of the State of California; and;
WHEREAS, BEAUMONT POINTE PARTNERS LLC ("Owner") has a legal and equitable interest in approximately 539.9 acres of land located south of the 60 Freeway and west of Jack Rabbit Trail in the County of Riverside, State of California legally described and depicted on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference ("Property"); and
WHEREAS, the Property is in the unincorporated area of the County of Riverside and in the Sphere of Influence (as such term is defined in Govt. Code Section 56076) of the City of Beaumont and the City desires to annex the Property into the City of Beaumont pursuant to the Cortese -Knox -Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000, commencing with Section 56000 of the California Government Code; and WHEREAS, the Property is, or will be made, subject to the following entitlements:

General Plan Amendment (PLAN2019-0284), Pre -Zoning the Property to specific plan (PLAN2019-0283); Beaumont Pointe Specific Plan (SP2019-0003); Beaumont Pointe Sign Program (PLAN2022-0856); Vesting Tentative Parcel Map No. 38161 (PM2022-0014); Minor Amendment to the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan; and certification of Final Environmental Impact Report No. SCH No. 2020099007 ("FEIR") as supplemented by the Supplemental CEQA Memorandum prepared by T&B Planning, Inc. dated March 4, 2024 and adopting findings, a Statement of Overriding Considerations and a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (collectively the "Entitlements") and is proposed to be annexed into the City; and WHEREAS, the Project (defined below) includes approximately 30.2 acres to be developed for commercial uses as "The Experience at Beaumont Pointe", with community recreation, commercial, retail, restaurant and hospitality land uses, a 125- room hotel and related amenities; approximately 232.6 acres to be developed with industrial uses to accommodate users such as industrial incubators, light manufacturing, parcel hub, warehouse/storage, fulfillment center, high cube warehouse, cold storage warehouse, and e - commerce operations; and approximately 277.1 acres of open space; and WHEREAS the Project will provide jobs and industry in the City of Beaumont; and WHEREAS the Project will provide a community benefit to the residents of the City of Beaumont; and
WHEREAS, the Developer is not requesting from the City, nor is the City 1

providing, any form of financial assistance to locate, develop, construct and/or operate the Project in the City of Beaumont, and Developer agrees to comply with all conditions of approval; and
WHEREAS, to strengthen the public planning process, encourage private participation in comprehensive planning and reduce the economic risk of development, the Legislature of the State of California adopted Sections 65864 et seq. of the California Government Code, (the "Development Agreement Statute") which authorizes cities to enter into property development agreements with any person(s) or entity(ies) having a legal or equitable interest in real property for the development of such real property in order to establish certain development rights in the real property; and WHEREAS, the Development Agreement is intended to provide assurances to Developer that an approved Project may proceed subject to the specified policies, rules, regulations, and conditions of approval applicable to the Project at the time of approval, regardless of any changes to City policies, rules, and regulations after project approval, and provide assurances that City cannot otherwise unilaterally impose conditions of approval of the Project outside what is permitted by the Development Agreement; and WHEREAS the Development Agreement will eliminate uncertainty in planning for and securing orderly development and occupancy of the Property, assure installation of necessary improvements, and ensure attainment of the maximum effective utilization of resources within the City at the least economic cost to its citizens; and WHEREAS, the City prepared the Final EIR and, pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21092.5, the City provided copies of the FEIR to all commenting agencies and persons requesting copies of the responses; and
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission held a public hearing on the Project on November 29, 2023 and continued the item to the January 10, 2024 Planning Commission agenda; and
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission held a continued public hearing on the Project on January 10, 2024; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Beaumont (the "City Council"), at its regularly scheduled public meeting on March 19, 2024, held a public hearing on the Project and the Entitlements and continued the item to the April 16, 2024 City Council agenda; and
WHEREAS, as contained herein and in Resolution No. , the City has endeavored in good faith to set forth the basis for its decision on the Project and the Entitlements; and
2

WHEREAS, based on the foregoing recitals, City has determined that the Development Agreement is appropriate under the Development Agreement Statute and Beaumont City Council Resolution No. 1987-34 and consistent with the policies and programs of the City of Beaumont General Plan and any applicable specific plan; and WHEREAS the Development Agreement is voluntarily entered into in consideration of the benefits to and the rights created in favor of each of the parties hereto and in reliance upon the various representations and warranties contained herein; and WHEREAS, City, as "Lead Agency" under the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the CEQA Guidelines, has determined that the "Project," as defined and more fully described in the Development Agreement, has been fully analyzed per CEQA under the FEIR for the Project, as supplemented by the Supplemental CEQA Memorandum prepared by T&B Planning, Inc. dated March 4, 2024, and all other legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred.

NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
BEAUMONT DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. RECITALS
That the above Recitals are true and correct and are incorporated as though fully set forth herein.

SECTION 2. APPROVAL OF DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
That the City Council hereby approves the Development Agreement by and between the City of Beaumont and Beaumont Pointe Partners LLC ("Development Agreement"), a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "B" and incorporated herein by this reference, subject to the terms and conditions stated therein.

SECTION 3. SEVERABILITY
The City Council declares that, should any provision, section, paragraph, sentence or word of this Ordinance be rendered or declared invalid by any final action in a court of competent jurisdiction or by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences or words of this Ordinance as hereby adopted shall remain in full force and effect.

SECTION 4. EFFECTIVE DATE OF ORDINANCE
That this Ordinance shall take effect 30 days after its second reading by the City Council.

SECTION 5. EFFECTIVE DATE OF DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
3

The Development Agreement shall not be executed by the City until on or after the effective date of the Ordinance.

SECTION 6. REPEAL OFCONFLICTING PROVISIONS
That all the provisions of the Beaumont Municipal Code as heretofore adopted by the City of Beaumont that are in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance are hereby superseded to the extent of such inconsistency.

SECTION 7. RECORDATIONOFDEVELOPMENTAGREEMENT
The City Clerk is hereby directed to record the fully executed Development Agreement with the Riverside County Recorder no later than ten days after its execution.

SECTION 8. CERTIFICATION
That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published according to law.

PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 21st day of May, 2024.

CITY OF BEAUMONT CITY COUNCIL
David Fenn, Mayor
ATTEST:

Nicole Wheelwright, Deputy City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
4

EXHIBIT "A"
Legal Description
5

EXHIBIT "B"
Development Agreement
6

BAUME ONTA -C A L I F O R N I
Staff Report
TO: City Council
FROM: Christina Taylor, Deputy City Manager
DATE May 21, 2024
SUBJECT: Review of the Draft Downtown Beaumont Revitalization Plan (DBRP) Description Presentation of the Draft Downtown Beaumont Revitalization Plan (DBRP) by the City's consultant GHD.

Background and Analysis:

On November 1, 2022, City Council awarded a contract to GHD for the preparation of a Downtown Beaumont Revitalization Plan to serve as a planning and implementation document to achieve the Council's vision for the downtown commercial core. The plan builds on the vision set in the General Plan and strategies laid out in the Economic Development Strategic Plan. It provides a more granular and comprehensive planning picture with market -relevant development types and opportunity sites.

Throughout 2023, staff and GHD held formal and informal stakeholder meetings and conducted outreach to gather insights and interests from residents, businesses and landowners. Coupling this information with staff input and strategic direction from City Council, the Draft Downtown Beaumont Revitalization Plan accomplished these main goals:
• Analyzed the physical environment, regulatory needs, City objectives, and citizen and stakeholder desires.
• Established specific development goals, strategies and an implementation plan, with corresponding timing, anticipated costs, and potential funding sources for each implementation action.
• Outlined strategies for business attraction, retention, and expansion. • Created strategies to incentivize and encourage area development. • Provide critical guidance on enhancing the physical form of the downtown environment through urban elements like streetscape improvements and building prototypes.
• Ongoing work will include signage and updated design requirements specific to downtown.

Fiscal Impact:

The cost to prepare this report is approximately $150. The cost to prepare the Downtown Beaumont Revitalization Plan is $274,758 which was funded in FY23.

Recommended Action:

Receive the presentation and provide direction to staff.

Attachments:

A. Draft Downtown Beaumont Revitalization Plan

BAUME ONTA -c A L I F O R N I
Staff Report
TO: City Council
FROM: Robert L. Vestal, Public Works Director
DATE May 21, 2024
SUBJECT: Presentation and Discussion of Truck Routes
Description Discussion on the framework for studying and updating truck routes in the City.

Background and Analysis:

Over the past 15 years, Southern California has experienced exponential growth in industrial warehousing development. This is a national, and even international, phenomenon that has only slowed slightly due to increases in interest rates. According to regional development projections, growth will continue to extend east and north along 1-10 and 1-15.

Proposed warehousing development in the City in the past year exceeds 13 million square feet. Adjacent cities have also approved major industrial warehousing facilities in the past year, including Sun Lake Village North, a 620,000 SF industrial warehouse in Banning near the southeast corner of the I-10/Highland Springs interchange.

The City, County, State and federal governments each play roles in regulating the operations of commercial vehicles.
• Federal regulations established in 1982 dictate size and weight limits for interstate trucks, as well as access requirements.
• California regulations set more stringent truck size and weight limits known as California legal. For the average person, there is little perceived difference between a 65 -foot tractor -semitrailer (California Legal) and an 80 -foot tractor -semitrailer (STAA). However, the shorter California Legal truck requires less turning radius and are better for serving shopping centers adjacent to residential areas. Caltrans has designated Beaumont Avenue as an STAA Terminal Access Route from 1-10 to the south. • The City's General Plan Update identified a Truck Priority Network to serve existing and planned truck -served facilities, such as warehousing, truck storage/services, manufacturing, and commercial shopping centers.

One of the biggest challenges for the City is truck access to and from the western segment of 1-10. Approximately 29 percent of all trucks enter the City from 1-10 East and 31 percent of exiting trucks use 1-10 West. This puts significant pressure on 1-10 interchanges at Oak Valley Pkwy, 6th Street, Beaumont Ave, Pennsylvania Ave, and Highland Springs Ave.

Planned improvements along SR -60 and 1-10 will improve truck access (e.g., Potrero Interchange, UPRR grade seps at California and Pennsylvania, and widening and interchange improvements at Pennsylvania).

The future extension of Sun Lakes Blvd to Sunset Avenue will also provide additional truck access, however, this segment is in Banning and will require close coordination to implement a truck route on Sun Lakes Blvd. Furthermore, designating Sun Lakes Blvd as a heavy truck route poses potential impacts to existing residents.

A comprehensive analysis of truck access needs, existing and future truck volumes, and design considerations were compiled, resulting in the following observations:
• Truck access improvements are needed to WB 1-10;
• 1st Street may be a preferred truck route over Luis Estrada due to the closely spaced signals at I-10/Beaumont;
• Bike lanes on 1st Street could pose a risk if trucks are routed to 1st (consider an off-street adjacent path for bikes on this corridor);
• California Avenue should prohibit trucks north of 4th Street.

Other considerations for truck operations in the City:
• 1 in 10 trucks picking up/delivering goods to a facility in Beaumont need a place to park for at least 30 minutes;
• 1 in 20 trucks needs a place to rest for 10 hours;
• Legacy Highland will generate truck parking demand of approximately 2,000 trucks per day for short parking events, and 1,000 trucks a day for overnight parking requirements that are mandated by the Federal government. • Four locations have been identified for conducting turning analyses (refer to Figure 1).

City of Banning Update:

The City of Banning is proposing to update Banning's truck route as part of the next General Plan update. Banning intends to classify Highland Springs and Sun Lakes Blvd

as truck routes. This will impact Beaumont's ability to restrict and limit truck traffic on Highland Springs.
• Banning Pointe (Sun Lakes Village North SP) — After the recent judicial ruling, the Design Review is being sent back to City Council for re -consideration on May 28th. The SP remains in place for the use.
• Sunset Crossroads — DRAFT EIR was circulated for public comment and responses are being prepared. They are looking for a PC hearing later this summer. Banning staff continues to work on various entitlement documents in review. Entitlement actions include a GPA, SP, EIR, DA, TTM. • Construction timeframes for both are unknown at this time, but Banning staff imagines they would move quickly once all entitlements are in hand. • Sun Lakes Extension —Banning must have a first invoice by 6/30/25 per their grant agreement. Staff anticipates an 18 -month construction window, with completion on 12/31/26.

Future Items:

1. City Staff and Fehr and Peers will develop a draft Truck Route based on the Council's direction and discussion.

2. 2nd Discussion and presentation with City Council and possible adoption.

3. City staff will develop CIP projects for turning movement improvements and signing and striping installation.

4. City staff will conduct public outreach to enhance awareness.

EE 4th to SB Veile
E& 1st St to NB Pennsylvania
-11 1111M-
1"
1 Figure 1- Turning Analysis Locations
NEE Veile :o SEE Luis EEtrada
ES Oak Valley to SE Beaumont Ave
Fiscal Impact:

The cost of preparing the staff report is estimated to be $350.

The cost for Fehr and Peers to perform the required analysis and present the results is $74,474 and will be paid from the Public Works department's contractual services budget, GL Account 100-3100-7068-0000.

Recommended Action:

Discussion and direction to staff.

Attachments:

A. Truck Route Presentation

Beaumont Truck Routing Study Update
Presented By: Jolene Hayes, Fehr & Peers
Beaumont City Council - May 21, 2024

Beaumont Truck Routing Study Update

TRENDS &

REGULATIONS
National Trends
Local
State
Federal

EXISTING

CONDITIONS
Truck Patterns
Truck Volumes
Secondary Impacts

DEVELOPMENT

AND GROWTH
Regional Growth
Beaumont &
Adjacent Cities
KEY

CORRIDORS
Interstates
State Routes
Local Corridors

TRUCK ROUTING

CONSIDERATIONS
Safety
Access
Roadway Impacts

Supply
Chain &
Trucking
Trends
Development
• Drivers of Development (e -Commerce, Re -shoring, etc.) • Scale (High -Cube, Automated Warehouses)
• Operations (JIT, JIC, same -day, etc.)
• Future Projections
Truck Routing / Access
• Truck Access Required for Industrial and Commercial Uses • Growing Demand for Zoning/Land Use Changes (e.g., Banning) • Growing Congestion at Interchanges and Rail Crossings • ZE Trucks and Access to Charging Stations
Truck Parking
♦ So Cal lacks sufficient truck parking
+ HOS Rules require truck drivers to park and rest
+ 1 in 10 trucks parking at or near delivery/pick-up location for a minimum of 30 minutes
+ 1 in 20 trucks parking at or near delivery/pick-up location for more than 9 hours

LOCAL
STATE

FEDERAL
✓GP Truck Routes
✓No locally designated STAA routes
✓Beaumont truck parking prohibition
✓No off-street truck parking development
standards
✓CA Legal Truck Size
✓Truck Route Restrictions
✓AQ Standards
✓STAA Regulations
✓Hours of Service (HOS)
✓Electronic Logging Devices (ELD)

Truck Routes
• Access must be provided to truck generators
• Designation of local truck routes for CA Legal Trucks • Designation of STAA Routes
On -Street Truck Parking
• Beaumont prohibits it in all zoning districts
• County permits on -street truck parking

California Commercial Vehicle
ilk
Legal Truck Size & Weight Limits
• Length: 65 feet for single trailer; 75 feet for double • King Pin to Rear Axle (KPRA): 40 feet
• Height of Load: 14 feet
• Width: 102 inches
• Weight: 80,000 pounds
40' max. single vehicle
VC 35400(a)
kingpin
landing gear
If 40' max.
then
unlimited, provided semi -trailer does not extend forward of the rear of the cab of the motor truck or truck tractor.

VC 35400(b)(4)
Not allowed where route is posted for a 38' max. kingpin to last axle. VC 35401(e) & (f) May be operated on local roads only where it is deemed safe by the owner or person operating. VC 35401.1

Truck Route Design Guidance
Truck Route Design Considerations
• Recommended Lane Width:
• Inside lane: 11 feet
• Outside lane: 12 feet
• Turning Radius/Curb Return:
• 50 -foot (ideal to minimize overtaking)
• Median Considerations/Options:
• Painted instead of raised
• Mountable curb
• Construct median without a nose
Units: feet

15.00 ..i
WB-67 Vehicle Dimensions

53.00 3.0❑ 45.50

0.00 4.00 19.50

Federal
Commerci
al Vehicle
Regulatio
ns
STAA (1982) Truck Regulations Size & Weight Limits
• Truck Weight (tractor and trailer)
• 80,000 pounds
• Axle Loads
• 20,000 pounds on a single axle
• 34,000 pounds on closely spaced pair of axles
• Max width
• 102 inches
• Max length/number of trailers
• One 48 -foot trailer
• Two 28 -foot trailers

Federal Truck Driver Requirements
HOS & ELDs
• HOS rules adopted
in October 2016
• Full ELD
Compliance
December 2019
Penalties
• Fines up to $16k
• Downgrade to
driver's safety
record
• Loss of CDL
li 11 -Hour Driving
Limit
May drive a maximum of
11 hours after 10
consecutive hours off
duty.

Rest Breaks
May drive only if 8
hours or less have
passed since end of
driver's last off -duty
or sleeper berth period
of at least 30 minutes.

Limit
May not drive beyond
the 14th consecutive
hour after coming on
duty, following 10
hours off duty. Off -
duty time does not
extend the 14 -hour
60/70 -Hour
Driving Limit
May not drive after
60/70 hours on duty in
7/8 consecutive days.

Commercial
and Industrial
Zoning
(—I I City of Beaumont
— Truck Priority Network

11. I 4
1 \�
I I
I
I I
1 I
L 1
1�
- 1
♦ Oa, Valley Parkway -.

Zoning
▪ Local Commercial
Community Commercial
▪ commercial Neighborhood
▪ Manufacturing
1 1
r--
f
6th Street

Existing Land
Use &
Proposed
Development
r i Clty of Beaumont
Truck Priority Network
\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
\\\\�•
Olivewood
\� adastrin! Pwrk l
Land Use
Industrial
General Commercial
Neighborhood Commercial
•
•
\Leg sy.xtghfand\
Related Projects
Industrial
Commercial
Residential
NoLfowood
Residential
—1
e
e,

v
Existing
Conditions:

Truck Origins
and
Destinations
—30% of trips enter from I-10 East
—30% of trips exit on I-10 West
PI —15% of trips enter from CA -60 East
—20% of trips exit on CA -60 West
Source: Streetlight Data, 20
It5% of trips enter from CA -79 North
5% of trips exit on the CA -79 South

22-2023
—25% of trips enter from I-10 West
—20% of trips exit on I-10 East

In
Progress/
Complete
Industrial
Developme
nt

ROLLING HILLS RANCH
• Location: W 4th St / Distribution Wy
• —153 acres
• 3 MSF industrial

POTRERO LOGISTICS CENTER
♦ Location: W 4th St / Potrero Blvd
♦ —32 acres
♦ 577 KSF industrial

Proposed Industrial Development

ORCHARD LOGISTICS
• Location: Western Knolls Ave
/ Prosperity Wy
• —31 acres
• 590 KSF industrial, 20 KSF
office

BEAUMONT POINTE SP
• Location: W 4th St Corridor
• —540 acres
• 5.3 MSF Total
o —5 MSF industrial
4th Street

PROJECT
SITE

LEGACY HIGHLANDS
• Location: W 4th St /
Distribution Wy
• —1,415 acres
• up to —20 MSF industrial
• up to —145 KSF commercial

Proposed
Industrial
Developme
nt in
Banning
Sunset Crossroads
• Status: Proposed
• Bound by Highland Home Rd, I-10/RR
ROW, Sunset Ave, and Bob Cat Rd
• —534 acres
• Incl: 5.545 MSF industrial, travel center
Sun Lake Village North
• Status: Proposed
• Location: Sun Lakes BI at Country Club Dr
• —47 acres
• —620 KSF industrial

Sun Lake Village and Sunset Crossroad

BANNING

SUN LAKES BLVD
ABOIBOWLL MET OF PT NEEDHG 10 BE ACWIFEO
RNi11 OF WRY ID EE V1CATEO
AO(@ NSTYQA
ORNNM£ EREYEM

Proposed
Industrial
Developme
nt in
Banning
Banning 25
• Status: Proposed
• Location: Ramsey St & Hathaway St
• —25 acres
• —418 KSF industrial
Banning Commerce Center
• Status: Proposed
• Location: N Hathaway St & Morongo Rd
♦ —132 acres
♦ 1675 KSF industrial
♦ 368 Trailer Spaces
♦ 272 Docks

+X,XXX
` \\\\1\�� 1--
4a�e
Beaumont
\
\Pointe\
_i City of Beaumont
Truck Priority Network
Additional Daily
Truck Trips
1,0
Oak Valle Parkw
OohV tle\y\\\�
\`' Kirkwood
\ \Ranch
Logistics
Land Use
Industrial
General Commercial
mil Neighborhood Commercial

Related Projects
Industrial
\\� Commercial
Residential
6th Stree
1st Street
Sun Lakes
Sun Lakes Boulevard
N
A

Caltrans
District 8
Truck
Routes
Schultz Rd.. near Valle Vista

5.3 miles east of Rte 79 (PM 11.6)
Menlo Are. -i m0e
north of Rte 74
IPM 26.4)

TRUCK NETWORKS
on
California State Highways
DISTRICI 8
Yap ede
Not to scale
Last revised March 2, 2023
District 9
LEGEND
(CLICK HERE FOR MORE DETAILED LEGEND)
National Network (STAA)
Terminal Access (STAA)
65' Califomia Legal Route
65' Ca Legal 'KPRA Advisory
'KPRA Advisory
Safety Roadside Rest Area
Airport
30 •KPRA = Idngpin-[o+aer-axle distance
R.th RERN:ARDEVO
CAUTION: Rte 173
dosed from PM 1.0 to — T 4.rx Pr

11.3 due to rutted dirt road.

Steetwide at points. C7
Rte 19 Advisory from S. Jot of Waterman Canyon Rd.
by Arrowhead Springs Rd. in San Bernardino IPM 93)
to Marble Canyon Rd. near Camp Rok Rd. IFM 65A1
Rte 330 California Legal from City Creek
2 2 miles north of San Bernardino (PM 325)
to Route 18 (PM 44.1)
Gar ay Rr. in Palm Springs, PM 553
e Autry Trail in Palm Springs
M 47.8) ..k
Lite Break {PM 19.51'47.2)
.. ®
Rishir 11 1.1 miles south
/ Cahuilla Way IPM 923)
1 Break
79 from
miles ,.st Ama Rd. —5 miles
Amu MIL to east of Rte. 15 (PM 14.6)
015 mile
nth oiglurrieta Canna oepanrnml ai Transportaim
swigs
p,, . Rd. Legal Twit ACcea,
11 32nd and
Rannells
32nd al Palo north of
Verde Blvd. in Palo Verde
Palo Verde (PM 3.1) (PM 4.3)

0.56 mi south of the intersection
of Ramona Espy and
Sanderson Ave (PM 31.7)

Truck
Priority
Network
(Beaumont
GP)
��..I City Elouriclory - Iruck RrlorIiy
Q Sphere of Influence P.kenlwIFwdwon

a £ .
114

PENNSYLVANIA AVE

WIDENING/NEW RAMP
,
I
: rei
."
� � ��

Turning Movements for WB-67
Eastbound W 4th St
to Southbound Veile Ave
Eastbound E 15t St
to Northbound Pennsylvania Ave
age 242
E Oak Valley Pkwy / Pennsylvania Ave
Northeastbound Veile Ave
to Southeastbound Luis Estrada Rd
law
L. sir, -DEL
$I Ory An*
A01. .yr-•'.y 1r�4
isf
n.a,Lklif
narwes
roams
friar hair

Elevate Beaumont 2040
414
i
•
•
X61 . b ?
PIE
; ,fil ar
•
Alternative Route - via Luis Estrada Rd

1.1.11111

BAUME ONTA -c A L I F O R N I
Staff Report
TO: City Council
FROM: Christina Taylor, Deputy City Manager
DATE May 21, 2024
SUBJECT: Revisions to the Policy on Land Use and Sensitive Receptors (PLUS) Description Adoption of amendments to the PLUS, formalizing the Community Benefit Fee and updating requirements in the Analysis, Construction Phase, Siting and Design, Operations sections.

Background and Analysis:

Throughout 2022, staff and the Land Use Subcommittee worked together to prepare a draft policy for analysis of industrial developments. Staff worked with the Land Use Subcommittee on a draft policy which was originally presented to City Council on August 3, 2022. At that meeting, staff received feedback from City Council as well as interested parties. Staff continued to work with stakeholders, with the primary concern related to the 1,000 feet separation between dock doors and sensitive receptors.

On September 6, 2022, staff presented the policy with the additional information requested and additional points of discussion in a redline format. On October 4, 2022, Council held discussion and adopted the policy. Staff subsequently formalized the policy, clearing the redlines and incorporating Council's comments.

On December 19, 2023, City Council considered changes to the Community Benefit section of the PLUS and discussed additional changes to the document. On February 6, 2024, the policy changes to the Community Benefit section were discussed. There was general consensus in favor of the community benefit section amendments with direction to staff to discuss additional amendments with the land use sub -committee.

The land use sub -committee met on April 23, 2024, to discuss additional amendments to the policy. A redline version of the discussed changes is included as Attachment A to this report. A clean version of the PLUS is included as Attachment B to this report.

Fiscal Impact:

The cost to prepare this report and the changes to the PLUS is approximately $250.

Recommended Action:

Hold discussion and adopt amended PLUS as proposed.

Attachments:

A. PLUS redline
B. PLUS clean version

Policy on Land Use and Sensitive Receptors BEAUMONT
-CALIFORNIA-
Purpose
For the past decade, the City of Beaumont was one of the fastest growing cities in the region. The City's proximity to Los Angeles, Orange and San Diego counties, the availability of affordable land and high quality of life have all contributed to making Beaumont an attractive place to live and work. The continuing rate of growth in Beaumont and in the larger region exceeds the capacity of the City's financial resources to meet the needs for transportation infrastructure. Warehousing, logistics, e -commerce and distribution are established sectors of the Inland Empire economy and are increasing in the City of Beaumont. These uses contribute to local job growth and continue to expand based on trends in e -commerce. Due to the City's location, providing direct access to 1-10, SR -60 and SR79, it is anticipated that strong demand for growth in the logistics industry will continue.

The City recognizes construction and operations of logistics, warehouses and other similar types of projects in close proximity to sensitive land uses or sensitive receptors, negatively affects quality of life. Sensitive receptors generally include residences, schools, parks, playgrounds, community centers, assisted living, day care centers, nursing homes, hospitals, and similar uses. The City of Beaumont has all of these types of sensitive receptors and additionally has several active -55+ communities.

This policy is intended to provide a guide through which logistics, warehouses and similar projects can be planned in a way that lessens their impact on the community and the environment. This policy will aid in minimizing potential impacts to sensitive receptors by acknowledging the City's existing General Plan and zoning which provides location and standards for development of these types of projects and California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) project analysis. This policy does not exempt a project from preparation of the appropriate environmental review and application of any necessary measures that may arise as a result.

This policy provides criteria which shall be implemented to supplement project -level mitigation measures, to further reduce impacts related to logistics, warehousing and any project of similar size or type of development.

The application of this policy is intended to be included in the evaluation of and conditions of approval for individual development projects. This will provide standards for which applicants and the public can look to and will provide an opportunity for City staff to monitor individual conditions of approval. The policies are organized into specific categories, to address potential quality of life issues from initial design to construction and operations.

Applicability
The policy guidelines apply to new projects submitted after the policy approval date and will be implemented during the development review process.

This policy applies to logistics, warehouse and similar projects that include any building larger than 100,000 square feet in size or type. It is intended to provide a general guidance that will be appropriate for most industrial or logistics, warehouse or similar projects. Project -level review under CEQA applies to any project,

4.231.2,1.24

regardless of square footage and may include any technical reports including, but not limited to noise, greenhouse gas, air quality, and traffic. The Planning Department shall use this policy to review projects and in instances where a project does not conform to the policy shall document findings to be considered by the Planning Commission and City Council.

Analysis

1. An "Air Quality" study shall be prepared in accordance with CEQA and the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) guidelines which includes both project specific and cumulative impact analysis.

2. A "Health Risk Assessment" shall be prepared in accordance with CEQA and the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) guidelines when a proposed project meeting the criteria of this policy is located within 1,000 feet of a sensitive receptor.

3. A "Noise Impact Analysis" shall be prepared in accordance with CEQA guidelines to assess potential impacts to the neighboring properties and surrounding community.

4. A "Construction Traffic Control Plan" shall be prepared, reviewed and approved prior to issuance of a grading permit, which details the locations of equipment staging areas, material stockpiles, proposed road closures, and hours of construction operations.

5. A "Traffic Study" or "Traffic Impact Analysis" shall be prepared in accordance with CEQA, analyzing both Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) and Level of Service (LOS) C as allowed by the City's General Plan. The study shall identify improvements and fair share costs for the project.

6. A stacking or queuing study shall be provided as part of the project review. The study shall identify the necessary on -site queuing area so vehicle and truck traffic waiting to access the site shall not extend into the public right-of-way.

7. A "Water Supply Assessment" shall be prepared as part of the environmental review process.

8. A "Sewer Study" shall be prepared as part of the project review process.

9. An "Economic Impact Study" shall be prepared as part of the project review process. At a minimum, the study shall provide a cost for service analysis, estimate of revenue generated, anticipated property tax revenue and any other information necessary to provide a comprehensive evaluation of the fiscal impacts to the City. The study shall include best, and worst -case scenario lanalvsisl.

10. An "Energy Efficiency Plan" shall be prepared as part of the project review process which shows how the project will encourage efficiency above and beyond Title 24 requirements.

Construction Phase

1. During construction of the project, all copy of current California registration for each piece of construction equipment accessing the site shall be provided to the City. If equipment is not registered in

4.231.2,1.24
Commented [CT1]: PLUS committee does not believe this
language is necessary based on current evaluation
processes - City's financial advisors and staff review the study

California proof of CARB-Compliant engines or newer as identified by the most current CARB engine standards shall be provided.

2. Construction contractors shall locate or park all stationary construction equipment away from sensitive receptors nearest the project site.

3. The surrounding streets shall be swept on a daily basis to remove any construction related debris and dirt.

4. Dust control measures meeting SCAQMD standards shall be implemented for all land disturbance and construction activity. A sign must be posted during construction with a name and phone number to report air quality 'events'.

5. All Water Quality requirements and best practices shall be adhered to throughout the construction phase. A sign must be posted during construction with a name and phone unmbcr to report air quality levent4

6. Construction contractors shall prohibit truck drivers from idling more than five (5) minutes and require operators to turn off engines when not in use, in compliance with the California Air Resources Board regulations.

7. During construction, a City representative shall conduct an on -site inspection with a project representative to verify compliance with these policies, and to identify other opportunities to reduce construction impacts.

8. A sign must be posted during construction with a name and phone number to report noise, water quality or other project lconcernsl.

Siting and Design

1. Truck bays and loading docks shall be a minimum of 1,000 feet, from the property line of the sensitive receptor to the nearest dock door using a direct straight-line method. This distance may be reduced if the site design includes berms or other similar features to appropriately shield and buffer the sensitive receptors from the active truck operations areas. Dock doors shall not be visible from surrounding residential properties or the public right-of-way. Other setbacks appropriate to the site's zoning classification shall be incorporated in the design. Anty reduction to the 1000 foot distance must be approved by staff Planning Commission.

2. Projects shall be designed to provide adequate on -site parking for commercial trucks and passenger vehicles and on -site queuing for trucks not visible from sensitive receptors. Commercial trucks shall not be parked in the public right-of-way or nearby residential areas. Queuing shall not extend into the public right- of-way.

3. Truck driveways shall be placed on streets that do not front sensitive receptors.

4. Sites shall clearly mark entry and exit points for trucks and service vehicles.

4.231.2,1.24
'Commented [CT2]: PLUS Committee: Ok with
redundancy, Already an AQMD requirement.

Commented [CT3]: Wrong line. Belongs with #4
Commented [CT4]: Added this line in as a catch all for
reporting

5. Facility operators shall establish specific truck routes between the facility and regular destinations, identifying the most direct routes to the nearest highway/freeway and prohibit traveling near sensitive receptors or through residential neighborhoods. The truck route should be submitted as part of the entitlement package.

6. Separate entry and exit points for trucks and passenger vehicles shall be provided to minimize vehicle/truck conflict.

7. Sites shall be densely screened with landscaping along all bordering streets and adjacent sensitive receptors, with trees spaced no further apart than 25 feet on center. Trees utilized in landscape screening shall be a minimum of 36 -inch box with a minimum calliper (trunk measurement) ofi- 52.5 to 3.5". A Ipermanentl maintenance mechanism shall be approved as part of the entitlement process to assure that the landscaping remains in place and functional in accordance with the approved landscaping plan.

8. A "wing -wall" shall be installed perpendicular to the loading dock areas to further reduce truck or operational noise and to serve as an aesthetic screening feature for the loading area when adjacent to sensitive receptors.

9. All project lighting shall comply with the City's "Dark Sky Ordinance", Beaumont Municipal Code Chapter 8.50 Outdoor Lighting. Lighting shall be shielded and directed down to the interior of the site and not spill over onto adjacent properties.

10. Project facilities shall install electrical panels and conduit to facilitate future electrical connections, to eliminate idling of main and auxiliary engines during the loading and unloading process. At all cold storage facilities electrical connections shall be provided to each dock.

11. Facility construction and operational noise shall comply with Beaumont Municipal Code Chapter 9.02 Noise Control.

12. Sites shall be designed to significantly minimize aesthetic impact and structures shall have a neutral or earth tone palette, blending in with the surrounding environment. Pad heights shall be varied to blend with existing topography and provide visual dimension and reduce visible height of a Istructurel.

13. A.Mcchanical or structural equipment shall be placed out of public view and completely screened wh,.,� vi ibIc. Any mechanical or structural equipment or components located on the exterior of the building shall be completely screened from view and enclosed to protect the equipment and deter vandalism.

Ope
ration

1. Facility operators shall prohibit truck drivers from id11Rgidling [foil more than five (5) minutes and require operators to turn off engines when not in use, in compliance with the California Air Resources Board regulations.

2. Facility operators shall coordinate with CARB and SCAQMD to obtain the latest information about regional air quality concentrations, health risks, and trucking regulations.

4.231.2,1.24
Formatted: Strikethrough
Commented [CT5]: PLUS Committee: concurs
Commented [CT6]: PLUS Committee: Ok with comment
Formatted: Strikethrough
Commented [CT7]: PLUS Committee: accepted

3. On -site equipment shall be compliant with CARB and SCAQMD regulations.

4. Facility operators shall require all drivers to park and perform any maintenance of trucks in designated on -site areas and not within the surrounding community or on public streets.

5. Facility operators for sites that exceed 250 employees shall establish a rideshare program, in accordance with AQMD rule 2202, with the intent of discouraging single -occupancy vehicle trips and promote alternate modes of transportation, such as carpooling and transit where feasible.

6. As minimum of 5% or as required by the Cal Green Code, whichever is gr atcr ofpmployce parking [ Formatted: Strikethrough spaces shall be designated and infrastructure installed and operational for electric or other alternative fueled 'vehicles

7. Externally announcing public address (PA) system are prohibited with the exception of emergency notifications.

8. Facility operational noise shall comply with Beaumont Municipal Code Chapter 9.02 Noise Control.

Any ongoing operational noise shall be evaluated through the CEQA process.

Wayfinding

1. Wayfinding signs shall be posted in the appropriate locations that trucks should not idle for more than five (5) minutes and that truck drivers should turn off their engines when not in use.

2. Wayfinding signage shall be posted in the appropriate locations that clearly show the designated entry and exit points for trucks, service vehicles and passenger vehicles.

3. Signs stating parking and maintenance of all trucks is to be conducted within designated areas and not within the surrounding community or on public streets shall be posted in the appropriate locations.

4. Signs should be posted in the appropriate locations and handouts should be provided that show the locations of nearest food options, fueling, truck maintenance services, and other similar convenience services, if these services are not available onsite. The facility operator shall also email this information to drivers expected to visit the site, 24 hours in advance of their arrival.

5. Each facility shall designate a point of contact responsible for implementing the measures described herein and/or in the project conditions of approval and mitigation measures. Contact information should be provided to the City and updated annually, and signs should be posted in visible locations providing the contact information for the point of contact to the surrounding community. These signs shall also identify the website and contact information for the South Coast Air Quality Management District.

6. Signage shall comply with the City's Sign Ordinance, Beaumont Municipal Code Chapter 17.07 Signage, which may be amended from time to time.

4.231.2,1.24
[Commented [CT8]: PLUS Committee: Accepted

i
Community Benefit

1. Applicants for proposed projects meeting the criteria for this policy shall engage in meaningful and transparent community outreach to engage the existing community in determining issues of concern. The applicant shall make a quantifiable effort to address concerns through site design and other means during the project entitlement process. Suggested outreach efforts include but are not limited to, hosting community meetings, making presentations at Homeowner's Association meetings, and Planning Commission workshops.

2. Warehouse/distribution, logistics, e -commerce and other similar types of industrial development typically produce some community impacts related to the construction and operation of these facilities. The applicant for any new project will be requested to participate in the community benefit fee program, which would will be utilized to further off -set potential air quality impacts to the community and provide a community benefit above and beyond any CEQA related mitigation measures. Thc fcc Program participation would will be based on a nexus study and subject to the requirements of California Government Code sections 66000 66025 (thc "Mitigation Fee Act"), and Assembly Bill AB) 1600. Thc fcc will be collected on a one time basis negotiated on a per -project basis. Funds collected through thc fcc program will be subject to designation for use by the City Council and will generally be used for projects that directly benefit the impacted community wherein thc project is located.

4.231.2,1.24

Purpose
Policy on Land Use and Sensitive Receptors
MO
BEAU

C A L I F O R N I ANT
For the past decade, the City of Beaumont was one of the fastest growing cities in the region. The City's proximity to Los Angeles, Orange and San Diego counties, the availability of affordable land and high quality of life have all contributed to making Beaumont an attractive place to live and work. The continuing rate of growth in Beaumont and in the larger region exceeds the capacity of the City's financial resources to meet the needs for transportation infrastructure. Warehousing, logistics, e -commerce and distribution are established sectors of the Inland Empire economy and are increasing in the City of Beaumont. These uses contribute to local job growth and continue to expand based on trends in e -commerce. Due to the City's location, providing direct access to I-10, SR -60 and SR79, it is anticipated that strong demand for growth in the logistics industry will continue.

The City recognizes construction and operations of logistics, warehouses and other similar types of projects in close proximity to sensitive land uses or sensitive receptors, negatively affects quality of life. Sensitive receptors generally include residences, schools, parks, playgrounds, community centers, assisted living, day care centers, nursing homes, hospitals, and similar uses. The City of Beaumont has all of these types of sensitive receptors and additionally has several active -55+ communities.

This policy is intended to provide a guide through which logistics, warehouses and similar projects can be planned in a way that lessens their impact on the community and the environment. This policy will aid in minimizing potential impacts to sensitive receptors by acknowledging the City's existing General Plan and zoning which provides location and standards for development of these types of projects and California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) project analysis. This policy does not exempt a project from preparation of the appropriate environmental review and application of any necessary measures that may arise as a result.

This policy provides criteria which shall be implemented to supplement project -level mitigation measures, to further reduce impacts related to logistics, warehousing and any project of similar size or type of development.

The application of this policy is intended to be included in the evaluation of and conditions of approval for individual development projects. This will provide standards for which applicants and the public can look to and will provide an opportunity for City staff to monitor individual conditions of approval. The policies are organized into specific categories, to address potential quality of life issues from initial design to construction and operations.

Applicability
The policy guidelines apply to new projects submitted after the policy approval date and will be implemented during the development review process.

This policy applies to logistics, warehouse and similar projects that include any building larger than 100,000 square feet in size or type. It is intended to provide a general guidance that will be appropriate for most industrial or logistics, warehouse or similar projects. Project -level review under CEQA applies to any project,

4.23.24

regardless of square footage and may include any technical reports including, but not limited to noise, greenhouse gas, air quality, and traffic. The Planning Department shall use this policy to review projects and in instances where a project does not conform to the policy shall document findings to be considered by the Planning Commission and City Council.

Analysis

1. An "Air Quality" study shall be prepared in accordance with CEQA and the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) guidelines which includes both project specific and cumulative impact analysis.

2. A "Health Risk Assessment" shall be prepared in accordance with CEQA and the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) guidelines when a proposed project meeting the criteria of this policy is located within 1,000 feet of a sensitive receptor.

3. A "Noise Impact Analysis" shall be prepared in accordance with CEQA guidelines to assess potential impacts to the neighboring properties and surrounding community.

4. A "Construction Traffic Control Plan" shall be prepared, reviewed and approved prior to issuance of a grading permit, which details the locations of equipment staging areas, material stockpiles, proposed road closures, and hours of construction operations.

5. A "Traffic Study" or "Traffic Impact Analysis" shall be prepared in accordance with CEQA, analyzing both Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) and Level of Service (LOS) C as allowed by the City's General Plan. The study shall identify improvements and fair share costs for the project.

6. A stacking or queuing study shall be provided as part of the project review. The study shall identify the necessary on -site queuing area so vehicle and truck traffic waiting to access the site shall not extend into the public right-of-way.

7. A "Water Supply Assessment" shall be prepared as part of the environmental review process.

8. A "Sewer Study" shall be prepared as part of the project review process.

9. An "Economic Impact Study" shall be prepared as part of the project review process. At a minimum, the study shall provide a cost for service analysis, estimate of revenue generated, anticipated property tax revenue and any other information necessary to provide a comprehensive evaluation of the fiscal impacts to the City.

10. An "Energy Efficiency Plan" shall be prepared as part of the project review process which shows how the project will encourage efficiency above and beyond Title 24 requirements.

Construction Phase

1. During construction of the project, all copy of current California registration for each piece of construction equipment accessing the site shall be provided to the City. If equipment is not registered in

4.23.24

California proof of CARB-Compliant engines or newer as identified by the most current CARB engine standards shall be provided.

2. Construction contractors shall locate or park all stationary construction equipment away from sensitive receptors nearest the project site.

3. The surrounding streets shall be swept on a daily basis to remove any construction related debris and dirt.

4. Dust control measures meeting SCAQMD standards shall be implemented for all land disturbance and construction activity. A sign must be posted during construction with a name and phone number to report air quality events.

5. All Water Quality requirements and best practices shall be adhered to throughout the construction phase.

6. Construction contractors shall prohibit truck drivers from idling more than five (5) minutes and require operators to turn off engines when not in use, in compliance with the California Air Resources Board regulations.

7. During construction, a City representative shall conduct an on -site inspection with a project representative to verify compliance with these policies, and to identify other opportunities to reduce construction impacts.

8. A sign must be posted during construction with a name and phone number to report noise, water quality or other project concerns.

Siting and Design

1. Truck bays and loading docks shall be a minimum of 1,000 feet, from the property line of the sensitive receptor to the nearest dock door using a direct straight-line method. This distance may be reduced if the site design includes berms or other similar features to appropriately shield and buffer the sensitive receptors from the active truck operations areas. Dock doors shall not be visible from surrounding residential properties or the public right-of-way. Other setbacks appropriate to the site's zoning classification shall be incorporated in the design. Any reduction to the 1000 foot distance must be approved by Planning Commission.

2. Projects shall be designed to provide adequate on -site parking for commercial trucks and passenger vehicles and on -site queuing for trucks not visible from sensitive receptors. Commercial trucks shall not be parked in the public right-of-way or nearby residential areas. Queuing shall not extend into the public right- of-way.

3. Truck driveways shall be placed on streets that do not front sensitive receptors.

4. Sites shall clearly mark entry and exit points for trucks and service vehicles.

4.23.24

5. Facility operators shall establish specific truck routes between the facility and regular destinations, identifying the most direct routes to the nearest highway/freeway and prohibit traveling near sensitive receptors or through residential neighborhoods. The truck route should be submitted as part of the entitlement package.

6. Separate entry and exit points for trucks and passenger vehicles shall be provided to minimize vehicle/truck conflict.

7. Sites shall be densely screened with landscaping along all bordering streets and adjacent sensitive receptors, with trees spaced no further apart than 25 feet on center. Trees utilized in landscape screening shall be a minimum of 36 -inch box with a minimum calliper (trunk measurement) of 2.5 to 3.5". A permanent maintenance mechanism shall be approved as part of the entitlement process to assure that the landscaping remains in place and functional in accordance with the approved landscaping plan.

8. A "wing -wall" shall be installed perpendicular to the loading dock areas to further reduce truck or operational noise and to serve as an aesthetic screening feature for the loading area when adjacent to sensitive receptors.

9. All project lighting shall comply with the City's "Dark Sky Ordinance", Beaumont Municipal Code Chapter 8.50 Outdoor Lighting. Lighting shall be shielded and directed down to the interior of the site and not spill over onto adjacent properties.

10. Project facilities shall install electrical panels and conduit to facilitate future electrical connections, to eliminate idling of main and auxiliary engines during the loading and unloading process. At all cold storage facilities electrical connections shall be provided to each dock.

11. Facility construction and operational noise shall comply with Beaumont Municipal Code Chapter 9.02 Noise Control.

12. Sites shall be designed to significantly minimize aesthetic impact and structures shall have a neutral or earth tone palette, blending in with the surrounding environment. Pad heights shall be varied to blend with existing topography and provide visual dimension and reduce visible height of a structure.

13. Any mechanical or structural equipment or components located on the exterior of the building shall be completely screened from view and enclosed to protect the equipment and deter vandalism.

Operation

1. Facility operators shall prohibit truck drivers from idling for more than five (5) minutes and require operators to turn off engines when not in use, in compliance with the California Air Resources Board regulations.

2. Facility operators shall coordinate with CARB and SCAQMD to obtain the latest information about regional air quality concentrations, health risks, and trucking regulations.

3. On -site equipment shall be compliant with CARB and SCAQMD regulations.

4.23.24

raciiityoperators shall require all drivers to park and perform any maintenance of trucks in g ed on -site areas and not within the surrounding community or on public streets.

5. Facility operators for sites that exceed 250 employees shall establish a rideshare program, in accordance with AQMD rule 2202, with the intent of discouraging single -occupancy vehicle trips and promote alternate modes of transportation, such as carpooling and transit where feasible.

6. As required by the Cal Green Code, employee parking spaces shall be designated and infrastructure installed and operational for electric or other alternative fueled vehicles.

7. Externally announcing public address (PA) system are prohibited with the exception of emergency notifications.

8. Facility operational noise shall comply with Beaumont Municipal Code Chapter 9.02 Noise Control.

Any ongoing operational noise shall be evaluated through the CEQA process.

Wayfinding

1. Wayfinding signs shall be posted in the appropriate locations that trucks should not idle for more than five (5) minutes and that truck drivers should turn off their engines when not in use.

2. Wayfinding signage shall be posted in the appropriate locations that clearly show the designated entry and exit points for trucks, service vehicles and passenger vehicles.

3. Signs stating parking and maintenance of all trucks is to be conducted within designated areas and not within the surrounding community or on public streets shall be posted in the appropriate locations.

4. Signs should be posted in the appropriate locations and handouts should be provided that show the locations of nearest food options, fueling, truck maintenance services, and other similar convenience services, if these services are not available onsite. The facility operator shall also email this information to drivers expected to visit the site, 24 hours in advance of their arrival.

5. Each facility shall designate a point of contact responsible for implementing the measures described herein and/or in the project conditions of approval and mitigation measures. Contact information should be provided to the City and updated annually, and signs should be posted in visible locations providing the contact information for the point of contact to the surrounding community. These signs shall also identify the website and contact information for the South Coast Air Quality Management District.

6. Signage shall comply with the City's Sign Ordinance, Beaumont Municipal Code Chapter 17.07 Signage, which may be amended from time to time.

Community Benefit

1. Applicants for proposed projects meeting the criteria for this policy shall engage in meaningful and transparent community outreach to engage the existing community in determining issues of concern. The applicant shall make a quantifiable effort to address concerns through site design and other means during the project entitlement process. Suggested outreach efforts include but are not limited to, hosting

4.23.24

community meetings, making presentations at Homeowner's Association meetings, and Planning Commission workshops.

2. Warehouse/distribution, logistics, e -commerce and other similar types of industrial development typically produce some community impacts related to the construction and operation of these facilities. The applicant for any new project will be requested to participate in the community benefit program, which will be utilized to further off -set impacts to the community and provide a community benefit above and beyond any CEQA related mitigation measures. Program participation will be negotiated on a per -project basis. Funds collected will be subject to designation for use by the City Council and will generally be used for projects that directly benefit the community

4.23.24

BAUME ONTA -c A L I F O R N I
Staff Report
TO: City Council
FROM: Claudia Shedd, Budget Specialist
DATE May 21, 2024
SUBJECT: FY2023-2024 3rd Quarter Budget Amendment
Description Staff recommends the City Council to review and approve staff's recommended budget adjustment for fiscal year 2023/2024. Budget adjustments are recommended for Self -Insurance, Public Works SB1383 Grant and Police, Fire Department AMR funds and approved CIP budget adjustments.

Background and Analysis:

Per the City of Beaumont Financial Policies, the Finance Department will maintain a system of tools for departments to manage their budgets and for financial monitoring and control of the City's budget during the fiscal year. This system will provide departments, Mayor and City Council with information on revenue, expenditures and budget performance at both the department and fund level. The system will include provisions for amending the budget during the year in order to comply with this policy and State of California budgetary statutes.

The City has had to make settlement payments in relation to general litigation. Due to these settlement payments the spending authority in the self-insurance fund needs to be increased to allow for the payments that have taken place.

On February 26, 2024, the City of Beaumont received an award notification for SB 1383 Local Assistance Grant Program (OWR4) from the Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (Cal Recycle) in the amount of $154,625. Since this grant falls between FY2023/2024 and FY2024/2025, staff is requesting to complete a budget adjustment of $50,000 for FY2023/2024 and the remaining of the grant will be allocated to FY2024/2025.

The Police and Fire Department have identified expenditures for the AMR program.

Staff plans to fund purchases using available AMR funds.

The following budget adjustments are recommended due to new information or to remain within spending authority.

Self -Insurance Fund:

Expenses
Settlements $153,403 General Litigation
Other Special Revenues Fund:

Revenues
Grants-SB 1383 Recycle
$50,000
CalRecycle- Partial Allocation
Expenses
SB 1383 Costs
$50,000
Capacity Planning and Procurement
Other Special Revenues Fund:

Expenses
Special Dept Supplies -AMR
$56,816 AMR General Expenses
On May 7, 2024, the City Council approved the Resolution for the fourth amendment to the City's FY2024-2028 Capital Improvement Plan. Attachment D reflects the budget adjustments needed to provide spending authority for the approved changes.

Fiscal Impact:

The General Fund unprogrammed expenditures will increase by $2,590,762. The Self - Insurance Fund expenditures will increase by $153,403 to balance the legal settlement expenses incurred throughout the fiscal year. Other Special Revenue Fund will increase by $50,000 with the amount coming from the SB 1383 Local assistance Grant and expense for Capacity Planning and Procurement. The AMR Special Dept Supplies will increase expense by $56,816 for the purchases of supplies for the Police and Fire Department. The CFD Admin Fund will increase expenditures by $295,000. The Capital Projects Fund will reduce fund balance by $1,474,690. The Road and Bridge DIF expenditures will increase by $1,525,310. The Wastewater Mitigation Fund will decrease expenditures by $1,463,716. The Police Facilities Mitigation Fund will decrease expenditures by $660,397 and the Traffic Signal Mitigation Fund will decrease expenditures by $27,946.

Recommended Action:

Approve FY2023-2024 budget adjustments as outline in attachments.

Attachments:

A. Self -Insurance Fund 120 Budget Adjustment Form

B. Public Works SB 1383 Grant Budget Adjustment Form
C. AMR Program Budget Adjustment Form
D. CIP Fourth Amendment FY2024-2028 Budget Adjustment Form (City Council approved on 5/7/24)
E. CIP Approved Changes

BEAUMONT
—CALIFOR NIA—
City of Beaumo nt
Budget Adjustment Form
FY 2023/2024
DATE: 5/7/2024
DEPARTMENT NAME: Finance Department
PREPARED BY: Claudia Shedd
Department Director Approval:

City Manager Approval:

City Council Approval:

Explanations/ Ju stification: Increase the Self -Insurance budg eted amount in orde r to support the settlements and worker's compensation e xpenses
Revenue = (Credit)
Expense = Debit
Revenue = (Credit)
Expense = Debit
Debit (Credit)

ACCOUNT NUMBER

ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION

CURRENT BUDGET

ADJUSTMENT

NEW BUDGET AMT
N otes
PO,
120-9662-7500-0000

SETTLEMENTS
(70,000. 00)
(153,403. 00)
(223,403 .00)

SETTLEMENTS AND WORKER'S CO MPENSATION EXPENSES
7r
N
C)
es)
7r
C"l
a)
0)
ca
0_
https://beaumontca.sharepoint.com/sites/financ egroup2/Shared D ocuments/Budg ets/BUDGET SPECIALIST/FORMS/Budget adjustme nt f orm - blank updated: Budget Adjustment F orm

DATE:

BEAUMONT
—CA L 1 T O R N I A---- -
4/18/2024
City of Beaumont
Budget Adjustment Form
FY 2023/2024
DEPARTMENT NAME: Public Works
PREPARED BY: sio mara Giroux

APPROVED BY
evenue - (Credit) Revenu e = (Credit)
Expense = Debit
Expense = Debit
De bit
(Credit)

ACCOUNT NUMBER

ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION

CURRENT BUDGET

ADJUSTMENT

NEW BUDGET AMT
Explanations / Justificati on
240-2371-4817-0000
58 1383 Grant Revenue
(50,000.00)
(50,000.00)
Taansfer a partial amount of the grant to use a vailable fu nds. 240-2371-7096-0000
58 1383 Gra nt Ex pen se
3,647.72
50,000.00
53,647.72
Pay for capacity pla nning and procurem ent requirements .

TOTALS'
$

C:1Users\sgiroux\AppData\Local \Micr osoft\Wi ndows \Inez[ache\content.Dutl ook\x6D6VYAl\Budget adjustment f orm - bla nk: Budget Adjustment Form (21

BEAUMONT
-C ALIFO RN IA-
DATE:

DEPARTMENT NAME:

PREPARED BY:

City of Beaumont
Budget Adjustment Form
FY 2023/2024
4/23/2024
Police Departmen t
Tara Chamberlin
Department Director Appro val: Sean Thuilliez
City Manager Approval:

City Council Approval:
mple ,.

Explanation s/ Justification : The AMR Fund needs to be spent down and the following items have been identified as qu alified expenses. 1. Ballistic Helmets currently in GF PD bu dget $38,316 - PO change f orm to be completed (23/241812) 2. M edical kits $9,000 for PD 3. $1,500 for Fire Dept expenditure

4. Fire Dept was instructed by CM to purchase req uested resc ue equipment for Station 66 from these funds in stead of FY24/25 GF for $8,000.

Revenue = (Cre dit)
Expense = Debit
Revenue = (Credit)
Expense = Debit
Debit (Credit)

ACCOUNT NUMBER

ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION

CURRENT BUDGET

ADJUSTMENT

NEW BUDGET AMT
Notes
O
ti
240-2320-7070-0000
Spec Dept Supplies - AMR Program
56,816.00
56,816 00
•..2.40
f r,n ation s - AMR Prngra pp
(56,816.00)
(82,216.00)
mov e from Reserve - -0000)
N
4-
0 L()
fV
CL
https://beaumontca.shar epoint.com/sites/BPDFinance/Shared Documents/Budget adjustment form - spending A MR funds: Budget Adjustment F orm

BEAUMONT
—CALIFORNIA—
DATE:

DEPARTMENT NAME:

PREPARED BY:
5/7/2024
City of Beaumont
Budget Adjustment Form
FY 2023/2024
Finance Department
Claudia Shedd
Department Director Approval:

City Manager Approval:

City Council Approval:

Explanations/ Justification: Fourth Amendment to the City's FY2024- 2028 Capital Improvement Plan City Council Approved 5/7/2024 *Account Number for Example only
Revenue = (Credit)
Expense = Debit
Revenue = (Credit)
Expense = Debit
Debit (Credit)

ACCOUNT NUMBER

ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION

CURRENT BUDGET

ADJUSTMENT I

NEW BUDGET AMT
Notes
500-0000-8040-0000
AD24-01

INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENT
-
295,000.00
295,000.00
AD24-01 LOCAL GOVERNMENT RADIOS - NEW PROJECT
500-0000-9950-0000
AD24-01

TRANSER IN
63,258,148.00
(295,000.00)
62,963,148.00
AD24-01 LOCAL GOVERNMENT RADIOS - NEW PROJECT
250-0000-9960-0000

TRANSFER OUT
1,482,414.00
295,000.00
1,777,414.00
AD24-01 LOCAL GOVERNMENT RADIOS - NEW PROJECT
710-0000-8030-0000
WW24-01

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
16,916,451.00
465,631.00
17,382,082.00
WW24-01 WWTP IMPROVEMENTS - NEW PROJECT
710-0000-8030-0000
WW24-01

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
16,916,451.00
1,584,369.00
18,500,820.00
WW24-01 WWTP IMPROVEMENTS- NEW PROJECT
710-0000-8030-0000
WW24-01

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
16,916,451.00
450,000.00
17,366,451.00
WW24-01 WWTP IMPROVEMENTS - NEW PROJECT
710-0000-9950-0000
WW24-01-D

TRANSFER IN
24,277,012.00
(465,631.00)
23,811,381.00
WW24-01 WWTP IMPROVEMENTS - NEW PROJECT
710-0000-9950-0000
WW24-01-T

TRANSFER IN
24,277,012.00
(1,584,369.00)
22,692,643.00
WW24-01 WWTP IMPROVEMENTS - NEW PROJECT
710-0000-9950-0000
WW24-01-0

TRANSFER IN
24,277,012.00
(450,000.00)
23,827,012.00
WW24-01 WWTP IMPROVEMENTS - NEW PROJECT
705-0000-9960-0000

TRANSFER OUT
9,435,221.00
465,631.00
9,900,852.00
WW24-01 WWTP IMPROVEMENTS - NEW PROJECT
510-0000-9960-0000

TRANSFER OUT
10,487,937.00
1,584,369.00
12,072,306.00
WW24-01 WWTP IMPROVEMENTS - NEW PROJECT
700-0000-9960-0000

TRANSFER OUT
5,356,153.00
450,000.00
5,806,153.00
WW24-01 WWTP IMPROVEMENTS - NEW PROJECT
710-0000-9950-0000
WW -08-T

TRANSFER IN
24,277,012.00
450,000.00
24,727,012.00
WW -08 CLOSE
710-0000-8030-0000
WW -08-A

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
16,916,451.00
(450,000.00)
16,466,451.00
WW -08 CLOSE

C:\Users\cshedd\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\NOSUGVRO\Budget adjustment form - blank updated: Budget Adjustment Form

ACCOUNT NUMBER

ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION

CURRENT BUDGET

ADJUSTMENT

NEW BUDGET AMT
Notes
700-0000-9960-0000

TRANSFER OUT
5,356,153.00
(450,000.00)
4,906,153.00
WW -08 CLOSE
710-0000-8030-0000
2017-005A

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
16,916,451.00
(1,584,369.00)
15,332,082.00
2017-005 WWTP EXPANSION - CLOSE
710-0000-8030-0000
2017-005A

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
16,916,451.00
(1,883,373.00)
15,033,078.00
2017-005 WWTP EXPANSION - CLOSE
710-0000-9950-0000
2017-OO5M

TRANSFER IN
24,277,012.00
1,584,369.00
25,861,381.00
2017-005 WWTP EXPANSION - CLOSE
710-0000-9950-0000
2017-OOST

TRANSFER IN
24,277,012.00
1,883,373.00
26,160,385.00
2017-005 WWTP EXPANSION - CLOSE
710-0000-9950-0000
2019-0100

TRANSFER IN
24,277,012.00
45,974.00
24,322,986.00
2019-010 PLC UPGRADE - CLOSE
710-0000-8030-0000
WW24-01

CAPITAL I M PROVEM ENT
16,916,451.00
(45,974.00)
16,870,477.00
2019-010 PLC UPGRADE - CLOSE
510-0000-9960-0000

TRANSFER OUT
10,487,937.00
(1,584,369.00)
8,903,568.00
2017-005 WWTP EXPANSION - CLOSE
705-0000-9960-0000

TRANSFER OUT
9,435,221.00
(1,883,373.00)
7,551,848.00
2017-005 WWTP EXPANSION - CLOSE
705-0000-9960-0000

TRANSFER OUT
9,435,221.00
(45,974.00)
9,389,247.00
2019-010 PLC UPGRADE - CLOSE
500-0000-8030-0000
2016-003P2A

INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENT
91,074,921.00
1,474,690.00
92,549,611.00
2016-003 POTRERO INTERCHANGE - CIP FUND BALANCE
500-0000-9950-0000
2016-003PH2T

TRANSFER IN
(63,258,148.00)
(1,525,310.00)
(64,783,458.00)
2016-003 POTRERO INTERCHANGE - ROAD AND BRIDGE DIF
500-0000-8030-0000
2016-003P2A

INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENT
91,074,921.00
1,525,310.00
92,600,231.00
2016-003 POTRERO INTERCHANGE - ROAD AND BRIDGE DIF
562-0000-9960-0000

TRANSFER OUT
12,641,021.00
1,525,310.00
14,166,331.00
2016-003 POTRERO INTERCHANGE - ROAD AND BRIDGE DIF
500-0000-9950-0000
2016-003PH2X

TRANSFER IN
(63,258,148.00)
(2,304,000.00)
(65,562,148.00)
2016-003 GENERAL FUND FUNDING
500-0000-9950-0000
CD -03-T

TRANSFER IN
(63,258,148.00)
(2,304,000.00)
(65,562,148.00)
CD -03 BUDGET CHANGE
500-0000-8030-0000
2016-003P2A

INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENT
91,074,921.00
2,304,000.00
93,378,921.00
2016-003 GENERAL FUND FUNDING
500-0000-8990-0000
CD -03-B

CAPITAL OUTLAY
10,461,545.00
(2,304,000.00)
8,157,545.00
CD -03 BUDGET CHANGE
500-0000-9950-0000
R -24-T3

TRANSFER IN
(63,258,148.00)
1,000,000.00
(62,258,148.00)
R-24 BUDGETCHANGE
500-0000-9950-0000
R -36-T1

TRANSFER IN
(63,258,148.00)
(1,000,000.00)
(64,258,148.00)
R-36 BUDGETCHANGE
500-0000-8030-0000
R -24-D

INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENT
91,074,921.00
(1,000,000.00)
90,074,921.00
R-24 BUDGET CHANGE
500-0000-8030-0000
R -36-C

INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENT
91,074,921.00
1,000,000.00
92,074,921.00
R-36 BUDGETCHANGE
500-0000-8990-0000
P -10-A

INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENT
91,074,921.00
3,100,000.00
94,174,921.00
P-10 BUDGET CHANGE
500-0000-9950-0000
P -10-T1

TRANSFER IN
(63,258,148.00)
(3,100,000.00)
(66,358,148.00)
P-10 BUDGETCHANGE
100-0000-9960-0000

TRANSFER OUT
-
3,100,000.00
3,100,000.00
P-10 BUDGET CHANGE 1

C:\Users\cshedd\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.0utlook\NOSUGVRO\Budget adjustment form - blank updated: Budget Adjustment Form

ACCOUNT NUMBER

ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION

CURRENT BUDGET

ADJUSTMENT I

NEW BUDGET AMT
Notes
100-0000-7900-0000

FUND BALANCE CONTINGENCY
2,736,436.00
(2,590,762.00)
145,674.00
P-10 BUDGET CHANGE
500-0000-8990-0000
PS -06-A

CAPITAL OUTLAY
10,461,545.00
(660,397.00)
9,801,148.00
PS -06 CLOSE
500-0000-9950-0000
PS -06-T

TRANSFER IN
(63,258,148.00)
660,397.00
(62,597,751.00)
PS -06 CLOSE
559-0000-9960-0000

TRANSFER OUT
1,515,854.00
(660,397.00)
855,457.00
PS -06 CLOSE
100-3100-8060-0000
R -28-A

VEHICLES
689,000.00
(430,000.00)
259,000.00
R-28 CLOSE
500-0000-9950-0000
R -11-T

TRANSFER IN
(63,258,148.00)
27,946.00
(63,230,202.00)
R-11 CLOSE
500-0000-8990-0000
R -11A

CAPITAL OUTLAY
10,461,545.00
(27,946.00)
10,433,599.00
R-11 CLOSE
556-0000-9960-0000

TRANSFER OUT
984,378.00
(27,946.00)
956,432.00
R-11 CLOSE
100-3100-8040-0000
R -27A

EQUIPMENT
370,000.00
(898.00)
369,102.00
R-27 CLOSE
100-3100-8040-0000
R -29A

EQUIPMENT
370,000.00
(4,608.00)
365,392.00
R-29 CLOSE
500-0000-8030-0000
R -33-A

INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENT
91,074,921.00
(73,732.00)
91,001,189.00
R-33 CLOSE
500-0000-9950-0000
R -33-T

TRANSFER IN
(63,258,148.00)
73,732.00
(63,184,416.00)
R-33 CLOSE
100-0000-9960-0000

TRANSFER OUT
-
(73,732.00)
(73,732.00)
R-33 CLOSE
TOTALS
$ (3,465,059.00)
Net Effect

C:\Users\cshedd\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\NOSUGVRO\Budget adjustment form - blank updated: Budget Adjustment Form

BEAUMONT
-CALIFORNIA-

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM- CHANGE LOG
FY24-28 AMENDMENT NO. 4
City of Beaumont
CIP
CIP
Project
Budget Changes unding
Source
295,000 CFD ADMIN
FY
Funding
2024
Update
A New Project
AD24-01 Local Government Radios
WW24-01 WWTP Improvements
465,631 DIF-WW
2024
A New Project
WW24-01 WWTP Improvements
1,584,369 Pay -Go
2024
A New Project
WW24-01 WWTP Improvements
450,000 WW -OP
2024
A New Project
2016-003 Potrero Interchange- Phase II
7,000,000 TUMF - PASS
2025
Budget Change
2016-003 Potrero Interchange- Phase II
1,474,690 CIP Fund Balance 2024
Budget Change
2016-003 Potrero Interchange- Phase II
1,525,310 DIF-R&B
2024
Budget Change
2016-003 Potrero Interchange- Phase II
2,304,000 General Fund
2024
Budget Change
CD -03 Downtown Revitalization
(2,304,000) General Fund
2024
Budget Change
R-24 2023 Citywide Street Rehabilitation & Maintena
(1,000,000) General Fund
2024
Budget Change
R-36 Annual Citywide Street Rehabilitation and Maint
1,000,000 General Fund
2024
Budget Change
P-10 Stewart Park Redevelopment and Skate Park (P1
(3,500,000) General Fund
2025
Budget Change
P-10 Stewart Park Redevelopment and Skate Park (P1
3,100,000 General Fund
2024
Budget Change
PS -06 Building C Renovation
(660,397) DIF -PD
2024
Closed
R-28 Purchase Vactor Truck
(430,000) General Fund
2024
Closed
2017-005 WWTP Exp PH 1 & Advanced R
(1,584,369) Pay -Go
2024
Closed
2017-005 WWTP Exp PH 1 & Advanced R
(1,883,373) DIF-WW
2024
Closed
2019-010 PLC Upgrade Construction
(45,974) DIF-WW
2024
Closed
R-02 Citywide Traffic Signal Upgrade & Capacity Impn
- DIF - TS
2024
Closed
R-11 Citywide Traffic Signal Upgrade & Capacity Impn
(27,946) DIF - TS
2024
Closed
R-27 Purchase Skid Steer Grader Attachment
(898) General Fund
2024
Closed
R-29 Purchase Tandem Vibratory Roller
(4,608) General Fund
2024
Closed
R-33 6th Street & Palm Storm Drain
(73,732) General Fund
2024
Closed
WW -08 Vactor Dump Station
(450,000) WW -OP
2024
Closed
Change Log
PagePa2 Ta012470

S:E6I
T T ❑ R NE Y S
BILLING DEPARTMENT REPLY To:
[email protected] Palm Springs, California
May 3, 2024
CITY OF BEAUMONT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES THRU: 4/30/2024
TOTAL DUE:

Sincerely,

SBEMP, LLP
By: Accounting Department
$115,842.02

SLOVAK BARON EMPEY MURPHY & PINKNEY LLP
Palm Springs, CA Indian Wells, CA Orange County, CA San Diego, CA New Jersey New York T (760) 322-2275 T (760) 322- 9240
T (714) 435-9591 T (619) 501-4540
p11 2s nf 0
T (609) 955-3393 T (212) 829-4399

SEiP

A T T O R N E Y S
1800 E Tahquitz Canyon Way
Palm Springs, CA 92262
Fed. ID #33-0833010
Telephone 760-322-2275
Facsimile 760-322-2107
May 3, 2024
City of Beaumont

E-MAIL INVOICES
Our file no:

City of Beaumont*240 PB LLC
Professional services through: 4/30/2024: Invoice # 86756 BALANCE DUE — PLEASE SUBMIT PAYMENT:

Amount
$78.00

SLOVAK BARON EMPEY MURPHY & PINKNEY LLP
Palm Springs, CA Indian Wells, CA Orange County, CA San Diego, CA T (760) 322-2275
New Jersey New York
T (760) 322- 9240 T (714) 435-9591 T (619) 501-4540 T (609) 955-3393 T (212) 829-4399 .......sbemp.,,,,...

S=E►iP

A T T O R N E Y S
1800 E Tahquitz Canyon Way
Palm Springs, CA 92262
Fed. ID #33-0833010
Telephone 760-322-2275
Facsimile 760-322-2107
May 3, 2024
City of Beaumont

E-MAIL INVOICES
Our file no:

City of Beaumont*Baker
Professional services through: 4/30/2024: Invoice # 86757 BALANCE DUE — PLEASE SUBMIT PAYMENT:

Amount
$5,773.05

SLOVAK BARON EMPEY MURPHY & PINKNEY LLP
Palm Springs, CA Indian Wells, CA Orange County, CA San Diego, CA T (760) 322-2275
New Jersey New York
T (760) 322- 9240 T (714) 435-9591 T (619) 501-4540 T (609) 955-3393 T (212) 829-4399 --...sbemp.,,,,...

S=E►iP

A T T O R N E Y S
1800 E Tahquitz Canyon Way
Palm Springs, CA 92262
Fed. ID #33-0833010
Telephone 760-322-2275
Facsimile 760-322-2107
May 3, 2024
City of Beaumont

E-MAIL INVOICES
Our file no:

City of Beaumont*Blackwell
Professional services through: 4/30/2024: Invoice # 86758 BALANCE DUE — PLEASE SUBMIT PAYMENT:

Amount
$2,146.05

SLOVAK BARON EMPEY MURPHY & PINKNEY LLP
Palm Springs, CA Indian Wells, CA Orange County, CA San Diego, CA T (760) 322-2275
New Jersey New York
T (760) 322- 9240 T (714) 435-9591 T (619) 501-4540 T (609) 955-3393 T (212) 829-4399 --...sbemp.,,,,...

S=E►iP

A T T O R N E Y S
1800 E Tahquitz Canyon Way
Palm Springs, CA 92262
Fed. ID #33-0833010
Telephone 760-322-2275
Facsimile 760-322-2107
May 3, 2024
City of Beaumont

E-MAIL INVOICES
Our file no:

City of Beaumont*Cazares&Rosa
Professional services through: 4/30/2024: Invoice # 86760 BALANCE DUE — PLEASE SUBMIT PAYMENT:

Amount
$2,466.90

SLOVAK BARON EMPEY MURPHY & PINKNEY LLP
Palm Springs, CA Indian Wells, CA Orange County, CA San Diego, CA T (760) 322-2275
New Jersey New York
T (760) 322- 9240 T (714) 435-9591 T (619) 501-4540 T (609) 955-3393 T (212) 829-4399 --...sbemp.,,,,...

S=E►iP

A T T O R N E Y S
1800 E Tahquitz Canyon Way
Palm Springs, CA 92262
Fed. ID #33-0833010
Telephone 760-322-2275
Facsimile 760-322-2107
May 3, 2024
City of Beaumont

E-MAIL INVOICES
Our file no:

City of Beaumont*Fernley
Professional services through: 4/30/2024: Invoice # 86761 BALANCE DUE — PLEASE SUBMIT PAYMENT:

Amount
$4,659.12

SLOVAK BARON EMPEY MURPHY & PINKNEY LLP
Palm Springs, CA Indian Wells, CA Orange County, CA San Diego, CA T (760) 322-2275
New Jersey New York
T (760) 322- 9240 T (714) 435-9591 T (619) 501-4540 T (609) 955-3393 T (212) 829-4399 --...sbemp.,,,,...

S=E►iP

A T T O R N E Y S
1800 E Tahquitz Canyon Way
Palm Springs, CA 92262
Fed. ID #33-0833010
Telephone 760-322-2275
Facsimile 760-322-2107
May 3, 2024
City of Beaumont

E-MAIL INVOICES
Our file no:

City of Beaumont*Police Dept
Professional services through: 4/30/2024: Invoice # 86764 BALANCE DUE — PLEASE SUBMIT PAYMENT:

Amount
$5,512.60

SLOVAK BARON EMPEY MURPHY & PINKNEY LLP
Palm Springs, CA Indian Wells, CA Orange County, CA San Diego, CA T (760) 322-2275
New Jersey New York
T (760) 322- 9240 T (714) 435-9591 T (619) 501-4540 T (609) 955-3393 T (212) 829-4399 --...sbemp.,,,,...

S=E►iP

A T T O R N E Y S
1800 E Tahquitz Canyon Way
Palm Springs, CA 92262
Fed. ID #33-0833010
Telephone 760-322-2275
Facsimile 760-322-2107
May 3, 2024
City of Beaumont

E-MAIL INVOICES
Our file no:

City of Beaumont*Urban Logic
Professional services through: 3/15/2024: Invoice # 86755 BALANCE DUE — PLEASE SUBMIT PAYMENT:

Amount
$39,412.10

SLOVAK BARON EMPEY MURPHY & PINKNEY LLP
Palm Springs, CA Indian Wells, CA Orange County, CA San Diego, CA T (760) 322-2275
New Jersey New York
T (760) 322- 9240 T (714) 435-9591 T (619) 501-4540 T (609) 955-3393 T (212) 829-4399 --...sbemp.,,,,...

S=E►iP

A T T O R N E Y S
1800 E Tahquitz Canyon Way
Palm Springs, CA 92262
Fed. ID #33-0833010
Telephone 760-322-2275
Facsimile 760-322-2107
May 3, 2024
City of Beaumont

E-MAIL INVOICES
Our file no:

City of Beaumont*Webb
Professional services through: 4/30/2024: Invoice # 86766 BALANCE DUE — PLEASE SUBMIT PAYMENT:

Amount
$4,867.50

SLOVAK BARON EMPEY MURPHY & PINKNEY LLP
Palm Springs, CA Indian Wells, CA Orange County, CA San Diego, CA T (760) 322-2275
New Jersey New York
T (760) 322- 9240 T (714) 435-9591 T (619) 501-4540 T (609) 955-3393 T (212) 829-4399 --...sbemp.,,,,...

S=E►iP

A T T O R N E Y S
1800 E Tahquitz Canyon Way
Palm Springs, CA 92262
Fed. ID #33-0833010
Telephone 760-322-2275
Facsimile 760-322-2107
May 3, 2024
City of Beaumont

E-MAIL INVOICES
Our file no:

City of Beaumont*Wright
Professional services through: 4/30/2024: Invoice # 86767 BALANCE DUE — PLEASE SUBMIT PAYMENT:

Amount
$24,763.90

SLOVAK BARON EMPEY MURPHY & PINKNEY LLP
Palm Springs, CA Indian Wells, CA Orange County, CA San Diego, CA T (760) 322-2275
New Jersey New York
T (760) 322- 9240 T (714) 435-9591 T (619) 501-4540 T (609) 955-3393 T (212) 829-4399 --...sbemp.,,,,...

S=E►iP

A T T O R N E Y S
1800 E Tahquitz Canyon Way
Palm Springs, CA 92262
Fed. ID #33-0833010
Telephone 760-322-2275
Facsimile 760-322-2107
May 3, 2024
City of Beaumont

E-MAIL INVOICES
Our file no:

City of Beaumont-OverRetainer
Professional services through: 4/30/2024: Invoice # 86769 BALANCE DUE — PLEASE SUBMIT PAYMENT:

Amount
$18,662.80

SLOVAK BARON EMPEY MURPHY & PINKNEY LLP
Palm Springs, CA Indian Wells, CA Orange County, CA San Diego, CA T (760) 322-2275
New Jersey New York
T (760) 322- 9240 T (714) 435-9591 T (619) 501-4540 T (609) 955-3393 T (212) 829-4399 --...sbemp.,,,,...

S=E►iP

A T T O R N E Y S
1800 E Tahquitz Canyon Way
Palm Springs, CA 92262
Fed. ID #33-0833010
Telephone 760-322-2275
Facsimile 760-322-2107
May 3, 2024
City of Beaumont

E-MAIL INVOICES
Our file no:

City of Beaumont -Retainer
Professional services through: 4/30/2024: Invoice # 86827 BALANCE DUE — PLEASE SUBMIT PAYMENT:

Amount
$7,500.00

SLOVAK BARON EMPEY MURPHY & PINKNEY LLP
Palm Springs, CA Indian Wells, CA Orange County, CA San Diego, CA T (760) 322-2275
New Jersey New York
T (760) 322- 9240 T (714) 435-9591 T (619) 501-4540 T (609) 955-3393 T (212) 829-4399 --...sbemp.,,,,...

PROPRIETARY/ENTERPRISE FUNDS
840 Community Facilities District
860 Evidence
TOTALS
FY 2024
Beginning Fund Estimated April Activity
Balance Revenues
(202,817,899.71)
2,472.14
(202,815,427.57) 18,442,029.00
18,442,029.00
FYTD 2024 Actual
Revenues
FY 2024 FYTD 2024
% Budgeted April Activity Actual % T/D Ending Fund
Expenditures Expenditures Balance
27,902,690.17 151% 18,442,029.00 14,342,289.00 31,309,774.46 0% (206,224,984.00) 128.57 961.17 - - 25.00 3,408.31
128.57 27,903,651.34 151% 18,442,029.00 14,342,289.00 31,309,799.46 170% (206,221,575.69)

Beginning Fund Balance

GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS
FY 2024 Budgeted April Activity FYTD 2024 Actual % FY 2024 Budgeted April Activity YT. FD 2024 Actual % T/D Ending Fund Revenues Receipts Expenditures Disbursements Balance
100 GENERAL FUND 35,456,303.91 67,853,103.00 1,796,189.67 47,142,361.52 69% 75,559,564.00 2,492,580.29 37,952,557.24 50% 44,646,108.19 120 SELF INSURANCE 6,329,219.38 445,000.00 467,784.25 0% 70,000.00 223,402.06 0% 6,573,601.57 200 GAS TAX 1,566,996.00 119,487.99 1,307,940.04 83% 1,566,996.00 1,175,272.00 75% 132,668.04 201 SB1 2,329,870.55 1,353,950.00 128,705.88 1,104,089.92 82% 2,018,738.00 378,871.49 19% 3,055,088.98 202 MEASURE A 2,895,980.53 743,600.00 621,195.03 84% 2,264,528.00 1,628,879.21 72% 1,888,296.35 205 AQMD 267,785.11 72,300.00 43,988.20 61% 90,000.00 86,819.10 0% 224,954.21 210 PEG 35,711.17 19,238.00 4,707.64 24% 14,630.00 4,587.14 31% 35,831.67 215 CDBG/GRANTS (407,984.19) 4,183,450.00 60,986.42 1% 4,981,581.00 627,267.47 13% (974,265.24) 220 COPS 523,785.60 159,459.00 158,582.83 99% 171,992.00 19,177.03 175,661.08 102% 506,707.35 225 ASSET SEIZURES (STATE) 294,397.72 758.11 6,323.89 0% 25.00 0% 300,696.61 230 ASSET SEIZURES (FEDERAL) 59,719.24 18.54 39,513.74 0% 0% 99,232.98 240 OTHER FUNDS 409,241.73 72,839.00 810.00 63,138.53 87% 164,970.00 12,000.00 97,766.22 59% 374,614.04 250 CFD-ADMIN 1,329,821.12 1,802,415.00 1,028,457.62 57% 1,854,890.00 17,031.09 939,591.54 51% 1,418,687.20 255 CFD-MAINTSVCS 70,092.92 3,950,426.00 2,617,231.58 66% 4,851,993.00 2,539,083.21 52% 148,241.29 260 CFD-PUBLIC SAFETY 197,521.59 1,086,506.00 827,596.81 76% 1,086,506.00 543,253.00 50% 481,865.40 500 GENERAL CAPITAL PROJECTS 39,101,617.32 117,960,732.00 9,286.12 16,167,015.72 14% 115,593,732.00 948,075.94 21,046,134.59 18% 34,222,498.45 510 CFD CAPITAL PROJECTS 13,214,314.25 1,058,869.00 383,259.91 0% 10,487,937.00 642,516.86 0% 12,955,057.30 550 DIF 6,728.22 196.05 0% 0% 6,924.27
552 BASIC SERVICES DIF 1,703,433.15 238,218.00 6,894.37 206,908.36 87% 813,664.00 698,664.34 0% 1,211,677.17 554 GENERAL PLAN DIF 231,129.48 27,953.00 663.12 22,457.74 80% 0% 253,587.22 555 RECREATIONAL FACILITIES DIF 2,500,479.58 391,556.00 38,936.16 315,285.77 81% 900,000.00 - 0% 2,815,765.35 556 TRAFFIC IMPACT DIF 1,371,765.82 174,068.00 4,048.91 153,420.97 88% 984,378.00 143,716.11 15% 1,381,470.68 558 RAILROAD CROSSING DIF 2,809,846.12 195,490.00 4,351.16 199,847.39 102% 773,561.00 215,642.10 0% 2,794,051.41 559 POLICE FACILITIES DIF 1,874,579.00 282,666.00 8,087.07 231,381.19 82% 1,515,854.00 59,333.25 0% 2,046,626.94 560 FIRE STATION DIF 5,799,822.34 354,691.00 891.55 323,056.04 91% 4,700,000.00 2,921,376.44 0% 3,201,501.94 562 ROAD AND BRIDGE DIF 12,090,362.68 1,388,471.00 36,863.37 5,161,005.11 372% 12,641,021.00 1,724,254.52 0% 15,527,113.27 566 EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS DIF 806,387.02 344,446.00 9,676.71 239,353.08 69% 0% 1,045,740.10 567 COMMUNITY PARK DIF 2,981,755.80 624,440.00 3,352.08 386,362.70 62% 2,414,828.00 0% 3,368,118.50 568 REGIONAL PARK DIF 1,977,512.20 56,839.35 0% 1,871,479.00 64,511.69 0% 1,969,839.86 569 NEIGHBORHOOD PARK DIF 3,770,090.08 756,574.00 4,056.57 472,272.42 62% 1,349,000.00 0% 4,242,362.50 570 PASS THROUGH DIF 6,882,593.93 0% 9,758,000.00 1,627,900.03 0% 5,254,693.90 850 Beaumont Financing Authority 35,953,179.63 3,080,846.00 2,559,916.26 83% 3,080,846.00 2,428,571.32 0% 36,084,524.57 855 Beaumont Public Improvement Authorit 47,777,680.32 3,023,346.00 2,724,171.29 90% 3,023,346.00 2,723,125.97 0% 47,778,725.64 TOTALS 140,031,289.44 207,107,456.00 79,812,559.82 39% 264,604,034.00 80,668,782.98 30% 145,954,663.60

FY 2024 FYTD 2024 Actual FY 2024 FYTD 2024
Beginning Fund Estimated April Activity % Budgeted April Activity Actual % T/D Ending Fund Balance Revenues Revenues Expenditures Expenditures Balance

PROPRIETARY/ENTERPRISE FUNDS
564 RECYCLED WATER DIF 4,119,073.25 442,851.00 10,226.32 639,023.24 144% 3,972,634.00 14,657.38 0% 4,743,439.11 600 INTERNAL SERVICE FUND 8,359,174.89 1,814,483.00 1,542,222.70 85% 7,140,037.00 56,856.25 1,697,761.63 24% 8,203,635.96 700 WASTEWATER 7,574,329.71 13,461,665.00 108,947.64 9,879,088.95 73% 13,765,222.36 568,217.08 9,288,144.18 67% 8,165,274.48 705 WASTEWATER DIF 9,714,063.78 2,172,351.00 84,173.76 2,536,387.33 117% 9,435,221.00 133,430.55 1% 12,117,020.56 710 WASTEWATER CAPITAL PRO 107,266,694.48 24,277,012.00 3,704,411.39 15% 24,548,883.00 122,087.50 4,460,505.83 18% 106,510,600.04 750 TRANSIT (75,904.84) 3,032,770.00 8,751.61 2,481,213.53 82% 3,032,769.24 190,138.45 2,246,784.92 74% 158,523.77 755 Transit GASB 68 Fund 512,421.35 - 0% 0% 512,421.35
760 TRANSIT CAPITAL PROJECTS 2,515,106.61 14,151,692.00 1,458,004.98 10% 14,151,692.00 1,494,612.12 11% 2,478,499.47 TOTALS 139,984,959.23 59,352,824.00 212,099.33 22,240,352.12 37% 76,046,458.60 937,299.28 19,335,896.61 25% 142,889,414.74