Beaumont City Council
September 17, 2024

L. S. Congleton & Associates

1. Most of Beaumont's new housing growth has occurred in large, attractive master -planned communities that are 7-10 minutes' drive outside of Downtown; and

2. New Beaumont households were perceived by retail/dining businesses as being fueled by modest -income families searching for "affordable" single-family living.

Future demand factors, however, are favorable for Downtown revitalization, based on our competitive research, personal interviews and demand analyses conducted for this study. As of updated July, 2022 U.S. Census figures, the reported median household income of Beaumont households is nearly $100,000 a year ($92,797) —dispelling the perception that Beaumont households are "modest -income." Most households consist of families with children living in single -family -detached homes (average household size of 3.3 persons).

Our in -field interviews with numerous Beaumont home builder representatives revealed that many newer Beaumont households are driving 15 to 45+ minutes to restaurants in Palm Springs/Palm Desert, Yucaipa, and Redlands. The City of Beaumont (including Downtown) is viewed as lacking a critical mass of quality, family, and occasion -oriented dining, in comparison to competing destinations located farther away.

Our competitive dining outlet research supports this view: there are only six Downtown Beaumont dining outlets totaling 13,790 square feet and rated Yelp 4+, at an average size of only 2,298 square feet. And the massive, Freeway -10 and Highland Springs, discount -value shopping node is generally viewed as unappealing to new residents because of the prevalence of low -rated (below Yelp 4 rating), chain restaurants.

Our conservative, estimated projections of future year housing growth reveal that Beaumont will reach about 20,110 occupied households in five years (2028); 22,610 occupied households in ten years (2033); and 31,021 households at build -out (based on General Plan figures). The immediate "sphere of influence" neighborhoods will add another 9,828 households, per the General Plan figures, at build -out, for a total of 40,849 households.

Future housing growth figures for Beaumont (and its sphere of influence) are impressive. A distinct void exists to serve these households with a creative, innovative collection of non -chain dining offerings.

III. SWOT ANALYSIS
Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities And Threats Analysis Is Key To Development Implementation Strategies
The SWOT Analysis chart below summarizes the Downtown Beaumont Economic Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats. A SWOT Analysis is a useful tool for determining the optimum strategies for Downtown success. Implementation strategies should emphasize Strengths; minimize Weaknesses; and produce action steps that reduce the risk of Threats.

L. S. Congleton & Associates
Downtown Beaumont Economic SWOT Analysis
Strengths
■ 'Chit 4 .,itPr[ida rrro-n•ill Mite hl#L.uii+rr rid40 dwthrd HOITtr[ ✓ fut,rr ramie.cif irrd NC Id drotMih xkpeclyd w tofrriu • lirdew Irrtorost rolls not Italy ba %Zw-re+v darnpacihorny demand onei'D pm Iminlk market drrre"dr+*wld COrWaif IV 10141. tawaiih•kl< daprwtktn!
• ciporol WWII:0 lot I:41 ran. ~Ira. +44+nC.1'vcr•}4I
▪ Ifiskr Jaftlilktfr 11401Pliwrfret G
Opportunities
SWOT
• t4rdimp.ItIlehrig r t• leel.n ,J;d n r.purdI:4l LPN.' .I km • 4:41(4;%11111 PM WI. rn . }dt rri4likr ri}r, EAr
▪ brim m awl Fr i*izi y D err %trill Resta Nprn l men
▪ c'IhId igen:MI lFi}rr /yeti Oven IRK Rr1r firxa timid IN ▪ 114hri* Or Crr• Cr i[ {.eM& in t Ior-[r#il rye demi complex of !F a w1415 oc..&d M a mental Dcntirrl.week rrifrike rc+y • e 4. &raarP rrt 5a. irtr su+ut a roe iree ihadotl ~NE • °Ordrrrt 44rb.a.C.,rrku 44rrk ra 22 rei o6.1rSs�[a�i3 • Eltmenamen 1J $sheiSgliocigitoi Indoporbiw4 lath ley+locum ! lg
iamiuyh Irpn rr f}• rK i°n1p i
Weaknesses
r4pn•p Ftnr.}Irt{!}
NIP ~41 ungr G+ !mun I I. I . Shirk
Milli lYtyrx to 60 , h hii t 4ddIIMt+h ray 1. 4#0rwri
Choir anlrll iA i Mal its iilyd TAW,. Daher* JUN :Ll.,
Mane [+r kre*T an mildest & iir In
Gdb[rlll io Ihtid ri iuErfiar dattklsrrr rrn opro hr'uw s 14420 for kp¢r1&.1 zadwis oMeriat rans+ur+{ }4rh+• •or. Wm. h4uSfY titrTM*Kr+[ ir4 st J n 4par' rr'.MI dtmrnd
Threats
• Implorm•-r!alqinn p{r.:Knl on col colon!. rely•rvll{Ird Imcie y hp we! knortud 4 oenrn.4 mtrt•
• iti.ici L} rrOirr frliWrlrL YtrriEid k5 ±Cl rr7 r or6r*Arrestb to tl.

It M[ 4Li. i duhdi (i]
IYI?.tr rrr*ied plYft31 Imp cdrat trrlx Krra t. [rr.Liwitls, L r1' b:. CrNhe pe#estr+an sire{} 4nil cICventowrr Fdeftriti' Dow rirkon watts Elt-XTrdt^'l . t4'P+rlt}Fe! }{e61y VW ! TRI ttnwx411{trnrricm ncs
S Orr I1H., eel: vienefrea crlinsuCkplivN{{r T4orn fey* The highest and best economic opportunities for new development, redevelopment, and renovation include using city -owned parcels and buildings to catalyze new construction and/or building renovation to draw contemporary, independent (non -chain) restaurants, bars, and brewery operators to Downtown. The use of city -owned sites for attracting innovative dining operators has the highest probability of near -term success, given Downtown's lack of significantly -sized available sites and buildings, and the prevalence of many, small, fragmented, privately -owned parcels (see Weaknesses).

Upgrading the retail and dining sales of Downtown businesses on a permanent basis, however, will require the improvement of the City's physical weaknesses. Restaurants and quality retailers seek pedestrian -friendly downtowns. Presently, Downtown's major arterials, 6th Street and Beaumont Avenue, experience high-speed traffic flows; insufficient crosswalks and street lighting; and dangerous parking situations due to speed of vehicles along the streets. Unlike competitive cities, such as Downtown Redlands and Yucaipa, Beaumont has not yet invested in traffic -slowing physical improvements; signage and way -finding; lighting; and parking arrangements that set the stage for a safe and attractive pedestrian dining/shopping district.

L. S. Congleton & Associates
Although national "threats," such as high interest rates and high inflation, are short-term, negative, economic conditions, the City may be able to ameliorate these uncontrollable conditions by favorably ground leasing its owned parcels, and providing selective financial assistance to businesses with strong business plans.

Other potential weaknesses and threats that may be ameliorated by City staff policies, encouragement, and actions, include:

1. Providing consistent, city -initiated leadership and financial commitments;

2. Committing to a phased approach to construct, physical improvements for slowing traffic (i.e., round-abouts);

3. Committing to a phased spending and construction plan for new signage; way -finding; crosswalks; street and alley lighting; city -owned parking and directional signage; and attractive alleyway improvements to encourage outdoor dining;

4. Adjust/expand Downtown zoning sections to accommodate a broader and more flexible array of housing and mixed -use products, ranging from single family detached to attached units at 8 to 25+ units per acre, as well as mixed -use, ground floor commercial with upper -level "workforce" or studio apartments.

5. Incorporate "business friendly" economic tools, such as designating a Downtown New Business Liaison; re-evaluating the potential for stream -lining permitting procedures across departments; and establishing a "one -stop," meeting process that professionally explains all governmental requirements "up -front" in order to eliminate future step "surprises."

6. Publicize a five -to -ten year "vision" and "Downtown Strategic Plan" that outlines physical improvements, and key sites for new, innovative creative dining concepts.

IV. SURVEY OF LOCAL AND REGIONAL RETAIL SHOWS AN ARRAY OF BIG

BOX/DISCOUNT VALUE AND GROCERY/CONVENIENCE STORES ARE

SERVING RESIDENT FAMILY NEEDS WELL
We evaluated the shopping centers serving Beaumont residents, as well as reviewing the restaurants, quick foods, and cafes. We have prepared a retail competition exhibit using our field work observations; selected interviews with shopping center leasing representatives; and selected data sources, including Loopnet listings, leasing brochures and CoStar. (See Exhibits 2, 2A, 2B, 3, 3A, 3B in Appendix.)
The primary reasons for evaluating the big box and grocery -store centers serving the local area are:

1. To assess the overall "health" and vibrancy of the Beaumont area retail market; and

2. To evaluate the quality, quantity and environment of the dining and small shop offerings already found in existing centers.

Page443of744

L. S. Congleton & Associates
Big box retailers and traditional, large grocery stores (of 42,000 to over 100,000 square feet) are typically not appropriate uses for revitalizing a small village downtown. These uses do not garner pedestrian activity, nor do these uses enhance the charm of or encourage repeat customers to a downtown setting. In contrast, dining outlets and small shop retailers, frequently independently operated, are more optimal choices for revitalization efforts.

SUMMARY OF REGIONAL & NEIGHBORHOOD RETAIL COMPETITION
Name
S.F.1'
Key Anchors
Regional (Highland Springs & Freeway 10)
Marketplace Beaumont
187,500
Best Buy, Aldi, Ross Dress for Less
Walmart Supercenter
230,600
Walmart Supercenter
The Home Depot & Big Lots Center
157,500
The Home Depot, Big Lots
Dollar Tree Center
42,500
Dollar Tree
Kohl's
91,000
Kohl's
2nd Street Cinema (Cinema West)
35,302
2nd Street Cinema
Grocery Outlet Center
85,600
Grocery Outlet, Planet Fitness
Rite Aid Center
52,709
Rite Aid
Sun Lakes Village
231,306
Albertsons, Hobby Lobby, Marshalls
Total
1,114,017
Cabazon Outlets
Cabazon Outlets
67,643
Designer Outlet Center
Desert Hills Premium Outlets
651,433
Designer Outlet Center
Total
719,076
Grand Total (Regional & Cabazon Outlets)
1,833,093
Beaumont Neighborhood Centers
Beaumont Center
111,762
Stater Bros. Market, Food 4 Less
Oak Valley Towne Center
70,900
Stater Bros. Market, Walgreens
Oak Valley Plaza
38,347
Rite Aid
The Marketplace at Calimesa
102,700
Stater Bros. Market
Total
323,709
Grand Total (Beaumont Neighborhood Centers)
323,709
Grand Total Regional & Neighborhood -Serving Center
2,156,802
I1'S.F. include pad spaces for restaurants, services, and other uses in the center. I The table above summarizes the shopping centers surveyed and reviewed in -field as part of this study. (See Exhibits 2, 2A and 2B in Appendix.) As of late 2022, there were few vacancies in the freeway -oriented, regional, big box centers, and no vacancies in the Beaumont and Calimesa grocery -store anchored centers. The tenant mixes are well -positioned for the high -growth Beaumont residential market, with a focus on family -oriented, discount/value goods and

L. S. Congleton & Associates
everyday convenience needs. The Beaumont/Calimesa/Banning survey, at the time surveyed, showed a low vacancy factor of 4.2%, a healthy available space rate.

The highest vacancies, and/or available space to lease, were observed in Marketplace Beaumont and Sun Lakes Village, both on Highland Springs Avenue. As of the in -field evaluation (in late 2022), The Marketplace Beaumont had six available spaces, five of which are small shops. The largest space available was the 25,000 -square -foot Bed Bath & Beyond space, due to the retailer's national financial problems and possible bankruptcy, not because of any local location issues. The Sun Lakes Village center showed a large, 20,000 -square -foot space available, as well as two small shops vacant.

V. SURVEY OF COMPETITIVE AND LOCAL RESTAURANT OFFERINGS SHOWS

DEARTH OF HIGH -QUALITY, CLOSE -BY DINING TO SATISFY BEAUMONT

RESIDENT DESIRES AND FAMILY -ORIENTED OCCASION NEEDS
In today's highly competitive dining environment, social media reviews are instrumental to long- term success —particularly to attract repeat resident customers and out-of-town visitors. Yelp is the most used source, with Google and Tripadvisor also used. During our field work, we evaluated the exterior and interior finishings of the restaurants in the competitive market, and summarized those dining establishments with the top ratings. Many patrons, particularly younger and first-time diners, will not try a dining establishment without a minimum Yelp or Tripadvisor rating of 4.0.

Within the Downtown core area, there are only six dining establishments rated 4.0 or higher on Yelp or Tripadvisor:

1. Cornerstone BBQ-4.5 Yelp: excellent take -away BBQ with sparse outdoor dining area.

2. Cafe Agape -4.5 Yelp: "trailer -like," drive -up, take -away, local coffee outlet with wide variety of coffee and tea selection, high quality. No indoor or outdoor dining area.

3. The Craft Lounge -5.0 Yelp. Local craft beer bar/lounge; owner partners with food vendors; numerous evening entertainment events.

4. Frijoles Mexican Restaurant -4.0 Yelp: Adjacent to City Hall; traditional Mexican menu; indoor and outdoor dining.

5. Tuscanos Pizza & Pasta -4.0 Yelp: Take -away pizza, party trays, small informal interior; owner also has larger restaurants in Yucaipa and La Quinta.

6. Ramona's Restaurant -4.0 Tripadvisor: Free-standing, 5,000 -square -foot, 51 -year -old traditional Mexican restaurant.

Page445of744

L. S. Congleton & Associates

SUMMARY OF NOTABLE DOWNTOWN

DINING SQUARE FOOTAGES IN
BEAUMONT 2023
NAME
S.F.

Tuscanos Pizza & Pasta
3,000
Frijoles Mexican Restaurant
3,200
Ramona's Restaurant
5,000
Cornerstone BBQ
700
Cafe Agape
140
The Craft Lounge Taproom & Bottleshor
1,750
Total Square Footage Existing
13,790
Average Size of Existing Restaurants
2,298
About six minutes from the heart of Downtown are three other small highly rated dining offerings:

1. Fuego Cravings -4.0 Yelp: a quick food establishment with modern interior specializing in birria.

2. Domenico's Italian Kitchen -4.0 Yelp: a suburban, small, take -away and sit-down traditional sports bar and family -oriented Italian restaurant, with large outdoor patio in Oak Valley Plaza, anchored by Rite Aid.

3. Two Ladds Bakery -4.5 Yelp: Small, excellent bakery with fresh baked goods, sandwiches, crepes, and drinks in suburban setting on border of Cherry Valley and Beaumont, on Beaumont Avenue.

Surprisingly, there are few highly -rated dining outlets in the big box regional -serving centers off Highland Springs Avenue in Beaumont and Banning. The following are three stand -out offerings, all very small with sparse interiors, all within one center: Sun Lakes Village.

1. Patsy's Country Kitchen -4.0 Yelp: Generous traditional breakfast/lunch offerings in traditional diner setting; open only until 3:00 p.m.

2. Surin Thai Restaurant -4.5 Yelp: Moderate -priced, solidly good Thai food in small outlet with modest interiors.

3. Darumaya-4.5 Yelp: Excellent Japanese food in very small, simple table setting.

It is noteworthy that the large -chain restaurants in the big box centers are generally not highly rated.

Page446of744

L. S. Congleton & Associates
The Marketplace at Calimesa, (an eight -minute drive from Downtown), located at Cherry Valley Boulevard and Freeway 10, serves many of the residents living in Beaumont's, golf -course neighborhoods nearby. In this center, is a modest -sized, free-standing, family -oriented outlet with a burger and beer menu:

1. Fire Rock Burgers & Brews -4.0 Yelp: Limited burger/beer menu, with periodic live entertainment; contemporary interior and attractive outdoor seating.

The Fire Rock Burgers & Brews represents the only new, (open 2021) free-standing, full - service restaurant located near Beaumont's newer, master -planned residential neighborhoods.

Built by Lewis Retail Centers, the Marketplace at Calimesa is a new shopping center facing Freeway 10, north of Beaumont, technically in the City of Calimesa but serving both Calimesa and Beaumont/Cherry Valley area residents.

Two notable restaurants on Myrtlewood Drive are located a short drive off the Freeway 10 in Calimesa:

1. The Haus Bistro (Yelp 4.5): An attractive, American/European restaurant/beer bar, full - service restaurant with friendly service; and

2. 21 Sushi House (Yelp 4.0): A sizable full -service Japanese restaurant.

The Haus Bistro specializes in schnitzel, and offers a range of fish, chicken and beef entrees and lunch sandwiches. This restaurant is one of the few nearby dining offerings with an imaginative, creative, contemporary interior, as well as presenting attractive outdoor furniture, within a short drive time from Downtown.

Downtown or "Uptown" Yucaipa, (a 15 -to -20 -minute drive time away), provides numerous creative and newly entrepreneurial dining destinations, including:

1. Hops and Spokes Brewing Company -4.5 Yelp: A newly -opened craft brewery with a creative, contemporary interior; large lounge/bar; recently open since Covid-19 pandemic.

2. Woodhaus-4.5 Yelp: A new, small, wood -fired pizza outlet adjacent to Uptown Wine Merchant.

3. Uptown Wine Merchant -4.5 Yelp: Attractive, new wine bar allowing customers to bring in pizza from adjacent operation.

4. Kluddes Smokehouse & Brews -4.0 Yelp: A new smokehouse/brewery in a former building that was a renovated "bank vault."
Although Yucaipa has about the same population in 2021 as Beaumont (about 55,000 people), that city has more highly -rated restaurants. In addition to the above restaurants, there are at least six other restaurants and quick foods rated 4.0 Yelp and higher, including the large, contemporary Bella & Yang Chinese and Sushi Bar on 5th Street. Other restaurants include the soda -fountain, "Disneyesque Main Street" -like decorated," Grandlund's Restaurants &

Page447of744

L. S. Congleton & Associates
Candies; and Yu Thai Pa, a small, modest Thai restaurant; and Ocean Pho, a small Vietnamese outlet. Other Yucaipa, highly rated take -away outlets include Italia Bella and Damasco Mediterranean Cuisine, both rated 5.0 on Yelp.

The City of Yucaipa benefits from Southern California regional visitors traveling to the Oak Glen area, especially during the apple -picking season, weekends, and holiday periods. It also has a small array of "historic" or interesting, older buildings for businesses to renovate. For example, the 4.5 Yelp -rated Jitters Coffee House in Yucaipa is housed in a tiny, charming old building.

VI. FUTURE -YEAR, CITY, BUILD -OUT DEMAND SUPPORTS ABOUT 22 RESTAURANTS IN DOWNTOWN. SERVING RESIDENTS AND VISITORS We performed restaurant/dining and retail demand analyses to test the near -term and build -out supportable square footage for Downtown Beaumont. Our sales projections are based on many years of experience conducting demand analyses for on -street shopping districts; thriving master - planned communities; neighborhood and specialty centers; restaurant company sites; and visitor - oriented dining/shopping destinations. Our demand models are based on shopping center industry methodologies for proven, successful centers, and on -street shopping districts.

We project that the dominant demand in the early years will be generated by Beaumont's upscale family households. Over the years, as a critical mass of Downtown operators are open and thriving, we expect additional sales support to be derived from the Beaumont's sphere of influence neighborhoods, as well as travelers along the Freeway 10.

Demand models were prepared for 2023, 2028 (five -years), 2033 (ten years) and for build -out per the City's general plan. We estimate 17,610 occupied households in 2023, based on the 2022 updated, U.S. Census demographics and recently reported housing permits. Starting with the 2022 U.S. Census Beamont population figure of 56,349 (see Exhibit 8, City of Beaumont Updated Demographics), and dividing this figure by the average household size of 3.3 persons to arrive at 17,075 households for July 2022, we then added the average number of five-year single family detached permits, or 535 units, to this figure. (See table summarizing five-year average single family detached permits for years 2018-2022, below and Exhibit 6 in the Appendix.) This 2023 household figure of 17,610 is believed to be a reasonable estimate, especially since recent single family detached permit figures have been 404 unis in 2021 and 790 units in 2022. It is a common occurrence that the U.S. Census under -reports the number of occupied households in new, developing residential areas, like Beaumont, that are experiencing exceptionally high annual growth rates.

Page448of744

L. S. Congleton & Associates

ANNUAL RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY PERMITS
Five -Year Average
2018
684
2019
531
2020
264
2021
404
2022
790
Total Units
2,673
Avg Per Yr
535
Source: Daniel Diaz, Management Analyst, City of Beaumont.

During our in -field Beaumont work evaluating builder's model homes in newly -constructed communities, we discussed the status of home sales rates with representatives —at a time of increasing mortgage interest rates (5.0% to 7.0%+). At that time, the home sales representatives stated that the home sales rates had not significantly suffered in this higher interest rate environment due to the perceived quality and affordability of homes offered. Over a 30 -year period, 5% to 7% mortgage interest rates represent workable interest rates in comparison to historical highs above 10% to 15%.

Our estimate of future -year, occupied households in Beaumont show that the City reaches about 20,110 occupied households in five years (2028) and 22,610 occupied households in ten years (2033), using conservative average annual increases of 500 homes per year. The City of Beaumont's General plan projects a total of 31,021 households upon total build -out, based on projected densities for lands available for development (Table 3.2b, page 46 of City General Plan). Per the General Plan, the immediate "sphere of influence" neighborhoods will add another 9,828 households, at build -out, for a total of 40,849 households (31,021 households plus 9,828 households, Table 3.2c, page 47 of City General Plan).

Our Downtown retail and dining demand models use realistically achievable, optimum capture rates of Beaumont resident spending, based on our experience with similarly -located Downtown cores (15% to 20% for food service/dining, and 5.0% to 6.5% for retail). Although many Beaumont residents live 7 to 10 minutes' drive away from the core Downtown area, the sheer lack of high -quality dining supply near residents' homes and along the Freeway 10 corridor are positive characteristics for drawing strong, sustained support to Downtown Beaumont. As noted above, many residents are driving 15 to 45 minutes from their homes to dining alternatives in Uptown Yucaipa, Downtown Redlands, or the Palm Springs/Palm Desert area.

Page449of744

L. S. Congleton & Associates
The supportable dining square footage for Downtown Beaumont is shown below:

COMPARISON OF PROJECTED DEMAND FOR AND SUPPLY OF DINING SPACE CITY OF BEAUMONT: 2023-2033 And Build -Out Per General Plan Current Year
Maximum
Dining Demand
2023
5 -Year
Maximum
Dining Demand
2028
10 -Year
Maxmium
Dining Demand
2033
City Build -Out
Maximum
Dining Demand
Sphere of
Influence Build -
Out Maximum
Dining Demand
City Build -Out
Dining Demand
Plus Sphere of
Influence
Additional
Dining Support
From Frwy 10 &
Other Regional
Diners (10%) 1/
City Build -Out
Dining Demand
Plus Sphere of
Influence
Downtown Demand for Dining Space (Square Feet)
31,421
35,882
40,343
55,349
13,152
68,501
7,611
76,112
2023 Downtown Dining Space Supply (Square Feet)a
13,790
13,790
13,790
13,790
N/A
13,790
N/A
13,790
Additional Net New Dining Space Supported (Squa e Feet) 17,631
22,092
26,553
41,559
N/A
54,711
7,611
62,322
Estimated
Number of
Restaurants at
Build -Out 2/
The Average
Restaurant Size
31 22
3,460
6 2,298
16 3,895
The supportable square -foot figures for Downtown Beaumont are contained on the first line, and represent just the demand for Downtown core offerings (not City-wide demand). (See also Exhibit 14 Appendix.) For example, over the next five years (in 2028), total Downtown dining demand is 35,882 square feet. Because planning horizons for new operations often require two to five years, it is useful to initially evaluate the five-year demand. Today there are 13,790 square feet of high -quality dining offerings already thriving in Downtown with excellent Yelp ratings (see below).

SUMMARY OF NOTABLE DOWNTOWN

DINING SQUARE FOOTAGES IN
BEAUMONT 2023
NAME S.F.

Tuscanos Pizza & Pasta 3,000
Frijoles Mexican Restaurant 3,200
Ramona's Restaurant 5,000
Cornerstone BBQ 700
Cafe Agape 140
The Craft Lounge Taproom & Bottleshor 1,750
Total Square Footage Existing 13,790
Average Size of Existing Restaurants 2 298
Therefore, the net new demand in five years for dining is 35,882 square feet minus 13,790 square feet, or 22,092 square feet of new space, as shown on the table above (the last line for the year 2028). The net new five-year (2028) demand is equivalent to about 5 to 6 new restaurants averaging about 3,700 to 4,400 each. Should the addition of 6 new restaurants occur over the

L. S. Congleton & Associates
next five years, the total number of Downtown dining offerings would double to 12 different operations. Although dining demand clearly exists for new Downtown restaurants over a short, five-year time horizon, the availability of ready -to -go, appropriate City -owned sites, buildings (for renovation) or other private sector parcels/buildings will be the critical factor in determining the timing.

The demand trends are positive for Downtown over a ten-year time frame. As shown on the above table, the net new demand generates 26,553 square feet of food service space (6 to 7 new restaurants averaging about 3,800 to 4,425 square feet). This figure is cumulative, meaning that if six new restaurants are added within five years, only one new restaurant is supportable in the next five years. Therefore, by the end of ten years, 6 to 7 new restaurants are theoretically supportable in Downtown, in addition to the 6 existing restaurants in 13,790 square feet that already exist, for a total 12 to 13 Downtown restaurants. It is believed the Civic Center Site and the Grace Building would satisfy (or perhaps slightly exceed) the Downtown demand over a ten- year period.

In five to ten years, depending upon construction timing, Downtown Beaumont may theoretically support at least a dozen dining outlets —re-creating a new image of itself as a worthy destination for residents —and possibly starting to draw some visitors traveling along Freeway 10 as well.

When the City reaches its build -out figure of 31,021 households, along with a sphere of influence that includes 9,828 additional households, we estimate that total dining demand in Downtown may reach 76,112 square feet, inclusive of additional 10% support from Freeway 10 travelers and other regional (non -Beaumont) customers. At an average size of 3,460 square feet, this demand translates into about 22 food service outlets, representing a strong pedestrian - oriented variety of drinking, dining, and take -away food service outlets.

Unlike restaurants, that require newly -constructed, high -ceiling new buildings for contemporary operators in the Downtown core, Beaumont already has a high quantity of small shop retail space in Downtown that can be upgraded and/or renovated. Many small shops have been in the Downtown for many years, but have suffered from a lack of pedestrian shopping and from a lack of high -quality dining offerings to draw customers to the area. As the area becomes more visited, and as the dining destinations become more popular, existing space retailers should experience increased customer traffic and sales. Some new stores may also be added, as leases expire, and the area matures.

As shown on the table below (and on Exhibits 1 through 1E), there is a total of 62,606 square footage of small shop space in Downtown Beamont—a large figure that may be restored, revitalized, and/or renovated for existing and new stores.

L. S. Congleton & Associates
1 SUMMARY OF COMMERCIAL USE ESTIMATED SQUARE FOOTAGES (THREE BLOCK

DOWNTOWN CORE/PROJECT BEAUMONT)
Retail and Food
Square Footage (SF)3/
% of Total Retail and Food SF
Markets/Liquor SF
Free -Standing Retail Businesses
Other Retail SF
Food SF 5/
19,093
25,813
62,606
36,719
13%
18%
43%
25%
Total Combined Retail and Food SF
144,231
100%
3/ Excludes services/offices & "B2B," (Business to business uses). 5/Former Thai Air Space is currently vacant. Ataco shop is planned to replace it. Current occupied food space is 36,719 less 1,600 sf or 35,119 as of 7/23.

Like the methodology used for dining, we compared the demand for Downtown retail with the supply of space that exists. (See below and Exhibit 15 Appendix.)

COMPARISON OF PROJECTED DEMAND FOR AND SUPPLY OF
RETAIL SPACE: 2023-2033 And Build -Out Per General Plan Current Year
Maximum Retail
Demand 2023
5 -Year
Maximum Retail
Demand 2028
10 -Year
Maximum Retail
Demand 2033
City Build -Out
Maximum Retail
Demand
Sphere of
Influence Build-
Out Maximum
Retail Demand
City Build Out
Retail Demand Plus
Sphere of Influence
1/
Downtown Demand for Retail Space (Square Feet)
25,258
28,844
32,430
44,493
6,506
50,999
2023 Downtown Retail Space Supply (Square Feet)21
62,606
62,606
62,606
62,606
62,606
Additional New Net Retail Space Supported (Square Feet) -37,348
-33,762
-30,176
-18,113
N/A
-11,607
1/Although dining can support an additional 10% at build -out, retail square footage is conservatively not expected to be increased. The rationale for limiting the expansion of small shop retail space is that regional diners (from Freeway 10 & outside Beaumont and its sphere of influence) have limited time after dining in Downtown Beaumont. 2/Downtown Retail Supply Excluding Free -Standing Businesses (See Exhibit 1).

As shown above, there is no net new retail space demand for newly constructed retail space for over ten years, nor is there any net new supportable space at City build -out. The rationale for this is that there is currently 62,606 square feet of small shop retail space that already exists in

L. S. Congleton & Associates
Downtown. Downtown retail demand is projected to be about 44,493 square feet in ten years, and 50,999 square feet at build -out —below the amount of space that already exists of 62,606 square feet. Pedestrian visitation should be boosted by the addition of restaurants, thereby benefiting customer awareness of Downtown retail spaces, spurring new investment, store revitalization, and upgrading of operations in future years.

The above conclusion does not preclude the ability to add a few newly -constructed retail spaces that are unique, contemporary, and compatible with a newly -created dining district —keeping in mind that the City's first -priority should be restoring the sales health and vitality of existing retail spaces, not the addition of newly -constructed space that is not supported by demand factors.

VII. STAKEHOLDER INTERVIEWS REVEALED ENGAGED, INTERESTED

PARTIES WITH A RECEPTIVENESS TO TRAFFIC -SLOWING

IMPROVEMENTS AND BUILDING SMALL LOT SINGLE-FAMILY-

DETATCHED HOUSING IN DOWNTOWN AREA
As part of our work, we conducted 14 City of Beaumont Stakeholder Interviews of Downtown businesses; property owners; and brokers, based on a list provided by City Staff The interviewees were well -engaged, highly interested participants in the process. Selected findings include:

1. Slow Traffic Down: All interviewees recognized the need to slow traffic down on 6th Street and Beaumont Avenue in order to effectively revitalize Downtown Beaumont.

2. Round-Abouts: Interviewees responded favorably to the suggestion of using round-abouts to slow traffic, and embraced the idea of the City installing them. No interviewee spoke negatively about the idea.

3. Physical Improvement Suggestions:
a. More cross -walks to improve the safety of streets for pedestrians; b. Archway signage announcing Downtown like the one in Uptown Yucaipa; c. Creation of "trail pathways" or walking routes that are lighted for pedestrians; d. Way -finding signage indicating parking areas;
e. Making alleys more attractive and useful for outdoor dining; f. Add more lighting to Downtown walkways, alleys and crosswalks to improve evening perception of safety; and
g. Addition of more signs announcing the speed limit along 6th Street.

L. S. Congleton & Associates

4. "Economic Tool" Suggestions:
a. Increasing the City's "business friendly" way of working with new businesses, reducing the "paper bureaucracy" that businesses face;
b. Revise Downtown zoning to allow small (tiny) workforce/studio apai tiiients to be built for young, Beaumont singles on top of commercial/restaurant buildings; c. Allow houses to be converted to commercial uses;
d. Revise Downtown zoning to allow the construction of small single family detached homes (for rent or own) around the 5th Street area; e. Establish improved communication between the City Economic Development Department and the Fire Marshall; and
f. Create a 5 -year to 10 -year implementation plan that is firm and "fail-safe" that would continue to be effective even if future City Councils change.

5. Downtown Development Use Suggestions:
a. Add/expand high -quality dining, targeting independent successful restaurants; b. Encourage, Downtown existing restaurants (in future years) that wish to expand their buildings and/or outdoor dining to do so;
c. Target a food user for the former "Beaumont Dry Cleaners" building in the Grace Avenue Gateway area, such as a coffee/bakery outlet;
d. Bring back the Ramona's food truck for nearby workers, such as those working at PSI;
e. Target a sandwich outlet/quick food cafe near PSI for workers; f. Add a craft brewery or beer tasting room, similar to the one in Yucaipa; g. Encourage restaurants to enhance and add outdoor dining areas; h. Add a wine bar with food; a bratwurst quick food outlet with outdoor dining; a gastro pub; and a baked potato casual dining outlet;
i. Target an independent burger restaurant like Slaters 50-50 in Orange County; J•
Build small lot single family detached rentals, particular in the Downtown area near 5th Street; and
k. Build small workforce/studio apartments for young people on second floor as part of commercial/restaurant mixed -use projects with ground floor commercial or restaurant.

Page454of744

L. S. Congleton & Associates

6. Other Downtown Suggestions:
a. Consider buying small vacant parcels to consolidate for new development; and b. Consider national retailers for sites as interim uses (10 to 20 years) until sites with auto/tire uses are viable to be converted to dining and retail operations.

VIII. RECOMMENDED ACTION PLAN
I. CITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM ACTION PLAN
In consultation with GHD's Urban Planner, Jonathan Linkus, we participated in two "vision planning sessions" to brainstorm possible catalyst sites in Downtown. The following illustrative drawing shows the locations of possible new catalyst projects. (See below.) J
A. GRACE AVENUE GATEWAY
- 2 Restaurants
1 1 2 Townhornes
2 — 3 Additional Cafes
Outdicior Dinning Araas
..... M..
.i_ •ia.ar
- 4 - 6 Small food 1 Bev
Civic Center Plaza
- 40 - 64 Studio Units
• 4 — 5 Retail Shops
• 4 '
...
....a *r■.■
1 •-
• Compact Single Farnil9
i 1 — 20 Horses

1. Expedite Re -Use and Renovation of City -Owned Grace Building (500 Grace Avenue) for Restaurant with Planned Opening within 3 to 5 Years. This charming, historic Spanish - style, city -owned building would make an excellent destination -oriented restaurant of 4,300 to 5,000 square feet (plus outdoor patio space), to be owned and operated by a proven independent entrepreneur (non -chain restaurant). Downtown currently lacks new, innovative, creative full -service, sit-down restaurants/bars, with the average size today in Downtown of only 2,298 square feet for top -rated (Yelp) cafes/restaurants.

L. S. Congleton & Associates
Securing a committed operator quickly prior to any City expenditures would initiate an efficient process. The new operator would retain an architect to design the renovations; and any financial assistance provided by the City could be in the form of a contribution to the approved renovation plans. We recommend that City Management offer a low/minor lease rate in the early years of operation, based upon a sizable, negotiated, financial commitment by the restaurant operator for fit-out/renovation expenditures.

The building lease term should be long enough not to restrict the ability of the restaurant owner to secure fit -out financing (e.g., 20 to 30 years) from a traditional lender and/or investors. The lease should require monthly or quarterly submittals of total revenue receipts, broken out by food versus alcohol sales, in order to track the financial success of the restaurant. The lease should also give the City an option (but not obligation) to "take back" the lease, including all improvements, should the operator's revenues drop below minimally -acceptable levels over an extended period, such as 6 months to a year (e.g., below $300 per square foot). This important clause allows City Management to stay informed about the restaurant's revenue streams, and to be prepared should the new operator not succeed as planned.

Prior to the City's approval of any lease, the new restaurant operator should submit its business plan that will include a minimum of five-year sales projections, including allocations of food versus alcohol sales.

2. Evaluate Re -Use of City -Owned Fleet Maintenance Site At 550 N. California for Near - Term Dining/Bar or Brewery/Tasting Facility. Re -use of this site is likely to require some demolition/clearing of existing uses, and possible construction of a new structure compatible with "Grace Avenue Gateway" nearby buildings. The City may wish to use a targeted approach to attract a proven, independent operator from Yucaipa or Redlands, the closest competitive locations. A 3,500 to 4,500+ square foot use may be accommodated, depending upon off -site parking allocations and any firm off -site parking commitments. For example, should it be determined that additional, off -site (peak period) parking may be accommodated nearby on 5th Street on a vacant parcel, the amount of buildable area on 550 N. California may be maximized. City financial assistance may be needed to clear the site and assist with renovation/new building costs.

3. Target and Solicit A Potential Food -Oriented Use for Former Beaumont Cleaners Building (6th Street and Grace Avenue). This small, charming "retro-style" brick -tiled building has excellent potential for 6th Street visibility for an independent, proven food operator in about 2,000 square feet. If possible, an outdoor dining space of 500 to 1,000 square feet should be part of the long-term plan for the building. Short-term parking may be accommodated adjacent to building, but shared parking alternatives

L. S. Congleton & Associates
should be explored with the re -use of the Grace Building, such as use of City -owned vacant land on 5th Street (for about 30 parking spaces).

4. Assess Legal, Zoning, Regulation and Financial Feasibility of Partial Closure and Attractive Enhancement of City -Owned Alley Bordered by Ramona's Restaurant, 5th Street, Ramona's Parking Area, 6th Street and PSI Building. Working with the private owners near the alley space, assess the process steps and pragmatic efforts required to enhance the alley with attractive improvements (e.g., re -pavement, pedestrian lighting, signage (including direction signage to parking areas). Determine the useability of the space for expansion of Ramona's outdoor dining patio space, as well as possible use as an outdoor -indoor bar space. Consider City financial assistance for alley improvements and outdoor improvements, including private sector assistance based upon submittal of appropriate historical revenues/sales and future business and financing plans based on the alley improvements.

5. Design, Approve, Fund and Initiate Physical Work for Necessary Street Improvements for Grace Avenue Gateway District. Long-term street improvements are optimally phased over time. The Grace Avenue Gateway District is the optimum location for initiating street improvements, including: (a) one round -about; (b) added street lighting; (c) alley enhancements for outdoor dining; (d) improved parking areas owned by the City; (e) way -finding signage and Downtown entry and/or Grace Avenue Gateway signage. (See conceptual drawing of future recommended streetscape improvements prepared by Jonathan Linkus, Urban Planner, GHD.)

L. S. Congleton & Associates
B. CIVIC CENTER SITE

6. Contract with Designer/Architect for Two to Three Preliminary Layouts and Elevation Sketches for Civic -Center Site. In order to secure a successful retail developer for any future Civic Center dining complex site, the optimum strategy is to have an experienced designer/retail architect prepare two to three preliminary layouts and elevation sketches for the estimated 123,141 square feet of land area. The sketches should conservatively assume that the site is self -parked, as well as possibly using shared parking arrangements during peak dining periods (evenings/weekends). Our recommended program for the Civic Center Site is shown in the table, below:

CIVIC CENTER SITE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

PROJECTED SALES (STATED IN TODAY'S DOLLARS)
LEASED

OUTDOOR TARGET TARGET TOTAL TOTAL

INDOOR MID -POINT

NUMBER DESCRIPTION SQUARE DINING MINIMUM OPTIMUM MINIMUM OPTIMUM TARGET SALES

SPACE SALES/SF SALES/SF TARGET SALES TARGET SALES
FEET 1
FACING ORANGE AVENUE AND 6TH STREET
Single -Level Dining with High Ceilings
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 Independent Major Restaurant & Bar
Independent Major Restaurant
Independent Major Restaurant
Independent Casual Family -Oriented
Independent Casual Family -Oriented Cafe
Small Casual Quick Food Cafe
Coffee Outlet
5,000
4,350
4,250
3,850
3,650
2,600
1,000
1,200
1,000
1,000
800
800
750
500
400
400
400
400
400
400
400
650
700
725
550
600
600
600
2,000,000
1,740,000
1,700,000
1,540,000
1,460,000
1,040,000
400,000
3,250,000
3,045,000
3,081,250
2,117,500
2,190,000
1,560,000
600,000
2,625,000
2,392,500
2,390,625
1,828,750
1,825,000
1,300,000
500,000

TOTAL CIVIC CENTER SITE
24,700
6,050
400
641
9,880,000
15,843,750
12,861,875
A retail architect's schematic layouts and elevation sketches will be useful tools for achieving all required City Council reviews and approvals. This step provides the City Management team with realistic design drawings for soliciting proven retail developers for the project, and for negotiating a long-term ground lease with the prospective developer.

7. Initiate Search for Proven, Successful Retail Developer with Public -Private Partnership Experience. Once a list of successful, public -private retail developers is compiled, consider transmission of an RFQ soliciting interest by the private sector. Initiate the review and interview process for a potential redevelopment of the site. Top consideration should be given to retail developers with experience in similarly -sized cities to Beaumont; Southern California building and leasing experience; a long-term commitment to retail property management efforts; a track record securing and leasing

L. S. Congleton & Associates
to successful, independent dining entrepreneurs; and the ability to build the Civic Center project in a phased approach (e.g., two separate phases).

8. Assess the Need for Infrastructure and Street Improvement, City Financial Assistance for Civic Center Project. Assess the need for potential financial assistance for improvements for parking spaces; street enhancements along Orange Avenue; construction of a round -about at or near Beaumont Avenue (or other traffic -slowing measures); city signage and way -finding; street lighting; and other, off -site infrastructure costs. Retain a cost engineer to create a budget for the off -site costs and expenditures required to complete the Civic Center development. Assess how the City may be able to financially assist the implementation of the Civic Center project by funding the necessary off -site and public amenity costs.

9. Negotiate A Deal for The Civic Center Site with a Realistic, Up -Front, Pre -Leasing Period, Approved Design Drawings and Phasing Plan. Within the next four to five years, target completion of a Civic Center Development Agreement and private sector firm financial commitment for a two -phased approach to building out the Civic Center project. An optimistic program would include completion of the first phase of development within two to three years of executing the final Development Agreement.

II. "ECONOMIC TOOLS" ACTION PLAN

10. Modify Administrative Procedures In -House, As Necessary, for The City to Be Considered More "Business Friendly". Review current administrative procedures and permitting processes, and prepare draft revisions. Meet with all affected City departments to reach consensus on revised procedures and processes. Obtain City Council approvals, if needed. From an entrepreneur's business perspective, a "business friendly city" is an authentic, cost -saving, economic tool. It may be one of the most powerful "economic tools" a California city can offer: a city that stands out as one that enthusiastically and pragmatically has a positive business environment is likely to draw more new independent entrepreneurs than other cities known for laborious, time - intensive approval processes.

11. Designate An In -House, "One -Stop" Liaison or "Downtown Business Concierge" to Assist New Businesses That Want to Open or Develop in Downtown. Instead of having a Downtown business applicant go through the permitting/procedural administrative process with individual City departments, designate one in-house City staff person to coordinate all the efforts on behalf of the applicant. Ideally, an applicant would attend one "first -step" meeting, spearheaded by the City Liaison, with the City Planning Department and other related departments, to discuss all the various variance requirements; permitting requirements; and other department reviews required. All

L. S. Congleton & Associates
City requirements should be explained in detail, up -front in one meeting, in contrast to a series of separate meetings at different times.

Business owners and developers need to know all the approval/permitting information up -front —not incrementally, or step-by-step. Businesses sustain added costs with incremental meetings, especially when a business finds out about "surprises" along the way, costing the business unplanned time, money and added costs "down the road." Transparency and clear communications, with a single -designated, enthusiastic City Liaison or "Downtown Business Concierge," would significantly improve an applicant's impression of Beaumont as "Business Friendly."

12. Revise and Simplify Downtown Zoning Allowing a Broad Range of Residential and Mixed -Use Densities. A large swath of the Downtown area is occupied by old automotive outlets, auto repair/tire outlet uses and light industrial/warehouse uses, intermixed with single family detached homes, small detached housing units, attached single -level rental units, mobile homes, and other old-style residential properties. This Downtown area is contained north of Freeway 10, along 5th Street, and south or below 6th Street (but not directly on 6th Street), east of Beaumont Avenue and west of Pennsylvania Street. Property owners interviewed in or near this area report strong occupancy of the residential units, many of which are "affordably" priced, small square footage units.

No new development has occurred in this area in recent years. The area south of 6th Street is unsuitable for retail; office; restaurants or other prime commercial uses that generally are desirable in Downtown areas. No market demand exists for these commercial uses in this area. Modern industrial/warehouse buildings are also unsuitable in this area due to the lack of large-scale parcels fronting Freeway 10, and strong competition from nearby, master -planned industrial parks that are more suitable for big users.

The only near -term development product for this area is residential —irrespective of the mixed, industrial/auto use character of the area. In order to promote and encourage residential development, the current zoning needs to be simplified and expanded to allow a broad range of residential densities. For example, a recommended zoning would allow residential densities ranging from 8 units to the acre to 25 or 30 units to the acre —or maximize the allowable density to as high as 50 units to the acre. The point is to allow residential development zoning flexibility, tied to density —but not product type.

Thriving Downtowns across the nation often have a mix of single -family -detached houses; ownership and rental townhomes; and rental apartments within walking distance of the core shopping district. To date, Beaumont's new housing growth has

L. S. Congleton & Associates
been focused on master -planned communities, most of which are about a 5 -to -10 - minute drive outside the Downtown area. In order to boost interest in new commercial, restaurant and retail businesses along Beaumont Avenue and 6th Street, as well as the Grace Avenue Gateway area, residential development of all kinds should be encouraged in the Downtown area.

13. Encourage Growth of Downtown Housing South of 6th Street and In -Fill Development West and East of Beaumont Avenue (Not On Beaumont Avenue). By simplifying the Downtown area zoning to include a range of densities, such as 8 units to the acre to 25+ units to the acre, property owners will have the flexibility to satisfy near -term and long- term demand market forces. Currently, housing demand is focused on detached products. At 8 to 10 units to the acre, creative, small lot, detached housing may be encouraged in the near -term. As acceptance of this higher density, detached product is accepted, both detached and attached, two and three -level "townhomes" may also be market -accepted, built at densities of 12 to 25 units per acre.

We understand that the current area south of 6th Street, in the downtown mixed use and sixth street mixed -use zones, which contain a mixture of automotive and repair uses, does not allow the development of any single -family -detached units —even at higher densities (such as 8 to 10 units/acre). Based on our property owner interviews, if the zoning were revised to allow higher density detached products, as well as attached, higher density residential, property owners would have the incentive to build quickly.

Without revising the zoning, we predict that many property owners will not develop anything for many years to come due to the lack of demand for high density housing today.

Revising residential zoning should also allow new housing without requiring the incorporation of retail/restaurant or other commercial ground uses. As stated above, there is insufficient demand for retail south of 6th Street to the Freeway 10. Moreover, the retail/restaurant demand should be focused within a walkable, concentrated, pedestrian area of a few blocks near and around the 6th Street and Beaumont Avenue area, including the Grace Building Gateway area; the Civic Center; and Beaumont Avenue area from 6th to about 8th Street.

14. Selectively Purchase Sites for Redevelopment. The City should create a plan for possible selective purchasing of key sites for redevelopment. The optimum parcels should be those sites with existing building uses, or vacant parcels with viable, feasible, pre -development programs. Critical key financial assistance is best provided in cases where business users have already been identified for the site, with firm commitments.

The City may provide a pivotal role in situations where there may be purchase price "gaps," or in cases where a proven developer or restaurant owner cannot close a land

L. S. Congleton & Associates
purchase deal without some land price, off -site improvement, or interior fit -out financial assistance, in the form of a grant or loan. In some cases, the City can be an interim owner in cases where acquisition timing may require some short-term assistance.

IX. FINAL COMMENTS
The City of Beaumont has a rare opportunity to use its City -owned parcels to catalyze the revitalization of Downtown. We believe the City staff has the prerequisite vison to encourage, entice, and bring together the required businesses and development partners to effectuate attractive "Showcase" dining projects over the next five- to ten -years.

We have enjoyed conducting this study and preparing this report. Please give us a call if you have any questions.

Very truly yours,
L.S. CONGLETON & ASSOCIATES
Linda S. Congleton
Principal
Appendix: Exhibits

DOWNTOWN

CITY OF BEAUMONT

ECONOMIC FEASIBILITY STUDY EXHIBITS
#

DESCRIPTION OF EXHIBIT

BEAUMONT

INVENTORY ANALYSIS
1 SUMMARY OF COMMERCIAL USE ESTIMATED SQUARE FOOTAGES (THREE BLOCK CORE) 1A

DOWNTOWN BEAUMONT CORE THREE BLOCK WALKING DISTANCE MAP 1B

NORTH BEAUMONT AVENUE MAP
1C

FAR NORTH BEAUMONT AVENUE MAP
1D
WEST 6TH STREET FROM EDGAR AVENUE TO FREEWAY 10 MAP
1E
EAST 6TH STREET FROM MAPLE AVENUE TO PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE MAP

KEY COMMERICAL

MARKET & COMPETITION
2 BEAUMONT-SERVING REGIONAL AND GROCERY STORE ANCHORED CENTERS 2A

REGIONAL & BEAUMONT GROCERY STORE ANCHORED CENTERS COMPETITION MAP 2B

REGIONAL & BEAUMONT (ONLY) GROCERY STORE ANCHORED CENTERS COMPETITION MAP 2C

CLOSE-UP OF REGIONAL HIGHLAND SPRINGS CORRIDOR MAP
3 BEAUMONT AND REGIONAL SUMMARY OF NOTABLE DINING, 2022-2023 3A
MAP OF BEAUMONT RESTAURANTS (YELP RATED 4 AND ABOVE)
3B
SUMMARY OF NOTABLE DOWNTOWN DINING SQUARE FOOTAGES IN BEAUMONT 2023 KEY

RESIDENTIAL MARKET & COMPETITION
4 NEW CURRENTLY -SELLING FOR -SALE RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS IN BEAUMONT (AS OF APRIL, 2023) 4A

BEAUMONT NEW HOME SALES
5 STAKEHOLDER INTERVIEW LIST
6 MONTHLY RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY PERMITS
7 BEAUMONT CURRENTLY AVAILABLE AND PLANNED LISTED APARTMENTS

DOWNTOWN

DEMAND ANALYSIS & PROGRAM RECOMMENDATIONS
8 CITY OF BEAUMONT UPDATED DEMOGRAPHICS (U.S. CENSUS BUREAU) 9 RETAIL AND DINING DEMAND DOWNTOWN BEAUMONT 2023
10 RETAIL AND DINING DEMAND DOWNTOWN BEAUMONT 2028 (5 YEAR) 11 RETAIL AND DINING DEMAND DOWNTOWN BEAUMONT 2033 (10 YEAR) 12 RETAIL AND DINING DEMAND DOWNTOWN BEAUMONT AT CITY BUILD -OUT 13 RETAIL AND DINING DEMAND DOWNTOWN BEAUMONT BUILD -OUT SPHERE OF INFLUENCE 14 COMPARISON OF PROJECTED DEMAND FOR AND SUPPLY OF DINING SPACE 15 COMPARISON OF PROJECTED DEMAND FOR AND SUPPLY OF RETAIL SPACE 16 DOWNTOWN BEAUMONT NEAR -TERM OPPORTUNITY SITES (CONCEPTUAL DRAWING) 17 DOWNTOWN BEAUMONT POTENTIAL STREET AND ALLEY IMPROVEMENTS (CONCEPTUAL DRAWING) 18 BEAUMONT SWOT ANALYSIS
19 CIVIC CENTER SITE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

EXHIBIT 1

SUMMARY OF COMMERCIAL USE ESTIMATED SQUARE FOOTAGES (THREE BLOCK DOWNTOWN CORE/PROJECT BEAUMONT) #
Address
1 501 Beaumont Ave
Name of Business
McDonald's
Retail Category/
Business Type 1/
Food/Dining
Retail and Food/
Square Feet 2/
Visible from
6th Street
2,975 Yes
2 502 Beaumont Ave
J C Oil Inc. Dba Beaumont 76
Services/Offices/B2B - No
3 529 Beaumont Ave
Baker's Drive Thru
Food/Dining
Food/Dining
2,516 Yes
4 550 Beaumont Ave
Juan Polio
5,452 No
5 560 Beaumont Ave
El Rancho Liquor
Miramontes Barber Shop
Good Companie Shoes
Yeong's Shoes
Auto Parts Pros, LIc (NAPA)
Boost Mobile
Market Liquor
5,292 No
6 620 Beaumont Ave
Services/Offices/B2B - No
7 626 Beaumont Ave
Retail
1,400 No
8 628 Beaumont Ave
Retail
1,400 No
9 636 Beaumont Ave
Free -Standing Retail
Services/Offices/B2B - No
5,400 No
10 643 Beaumont Ave
11 645 Beaumont Ave Gabby's Beauty Shop Services/Offices/B2B No 12 647 Beaumont Ave
JCB Electric
Services/Offices/B2B - No
Services/Offices/B2B - No
13 660 Beaumont Ave
Beaumont Glass Co.
14 680 Beaumont Ave
All American Mattress & Recliners
Retail
2,400 No
15 684 Beaumont Ave Sharp Image Barbershop Services/Offices/B2B - No 16 686 Beaumont Ave
Hair'em Salon D J C
Services/Offices/B2B - No
17 688 Beaumont Ave
Vacant
Vacant - No
18 690 Beaumont Ave
Craft Lounge
Latino Cellular #4
Food/Dining
1,750 No
19 701 Beaumont Ave
Retail
450 No
20 705 Beaumont Ave
Noah's Barber Shop
Just4UPrints (Custom Printing)
Beaumont Smoke Shop
Services/Offices/B2B - No
21 707 Beaumont Ave
Retail
770 No
22 709 Beaumont Ave
Retail
770 No
23 715 Beaumont Ave
Vacant
Vacant - No
24 719 Beaumont Ave
Top Nails & Spa
Taco Shop Coming Soon (Former Thai Air Cuisine)
Services/Offices/B2B - No
25 721 Beaumont Ave
Food/Dining
1,600 No
26 725 Beaumont Ave
Music Centre
Services/Offices/B2B - No
27A 726 Beaumont Ave Beaumont Chamber Of Commerce Services/Offices/B2B - No 27B 726 Beaumont Ave Sensible Adviser Services/Offices/B2B - No 28 727 Beaumont Ave
Plaza Liquor
Shear Wonders Salon and Day Spa
Market Liquor
2,000 No
29 737 Beaumont Ave
Services/Offices/B2B - No
30A 742 Beaumont Ave Dance Spectrum Services/Offices/B2B No 30B 742 Beaumont Ave Wardlow Enterprises, Inc Dba Spectrum Photography Services/Offices/B2B - No 31 746 Beaumont Ave
Beaumont Coin -op Laundry
Agua Pura Vida Beaumont
Smoke & Vape
Players Lounge
Toscanos 4/
Services/Offices/B2B No
Services/Offices/B2B - No
32 750 Beaumont Ave
33 754 Beaumont Ave
Retail
1,440 No
34 758 Beaumont Ave
Food/Dining
1,200 No
35 762 Beaumont Ave
Pnrrc ARA rnf 7.4.4
Food/Dining
3,000 No
36 777 Beaumont Ave
Citibank
Services/Offices/B2B - No

EXHIBIT 1

SUMMARY OF COMMERCIAL USE ESTIMATED SQUARE FOOTAGES (THREE BLOCK DOWNTOWN CORE/PROJECT BEAUMONT) Address
Name of Business
Retail Category/
Business Type 1/
Retail and Food/
Square Feet 2/
Visible from
6th Street
37A 790 Beaumont Ave
Law Offices Of Alexander Pham
Services/Offices/B2B
Services/Offices/B2B
Services/Offices/B2B
Services/Offices/B2B
Services/Offices/B2B
Services/Offices/B2B
Services/Offices/B2B
Services/Offices/B2B
Services/Offices/B2B
Services/Offices/B2B
Services/Offices/B2B
Services/Offices/B2B
Services/Offices/B2B
Services/Offices/B2B
Services/Offices/B2B
Services/Offices/B2B
No
37B 790 Beaumont Ave
Beaumont Concrete Company
Hollistic Spiritual List (Psychic)
No
37C 790 Beaumont Ave #102
No
37D 790 Beaumont Ave #114
M & T Great Haircuts
No
37E 790 Beaumont Ave #213
Phillip Parra L C S W
P H S Counseling Inc.

Financial First Aid
No
37F 790 Beaumont Ave #232 & 240
No
37G 790 Beaumont Ave Suite 106
No
37H 790 Beaumont Ave Suite 202
Tony Moreno Insurance Services Inc
Melissa E. Reilly Attorny-At-Law
Christine Mc Mahon, Psy.D
Renu Hope Foundation
The Beaumont House (Insurance + Realtors)
No
371 790 Beaumont Ave Suite 204
No
37J 790 Beaumont Ave Suite 224
No
38 802 Beaumont Ave
No
39 837 Beaumont Ave
No
40 861 Beaumont Ave
Frontier Communications
No
41 873 Beaumont Ave
Law Offices of Leah Larkin
No
42 874 Beaumont Ave
Beaumont State Preschool Beginnings
Beaumont Family Dental Inc.

Little & Sons Insurance Services, Inc (Closed)
Joanna Helen McCully Doctor Of Chiropractic
Dr. Lee Beaumont Dental
No
43 885 Beaumont Ave
No
44 906 Beaumont Ave
Vacant
No
45 914 Beaumont Ave
Services/Offices/B2B
Services/Offices/B2B
Services/Offices/B2B
Services/Offices/B2B
No
46 930 Beaumont Ave
No
47 965 Beaumont Ave
Michael's Barber Shop
Berkshire Hathaway House Services (Real Estate Sales)
Woodley's Jewelers
Classic Coins & Collectibles
No
48 966 Beaumont Ave
No
49 975 Beaumont Ave
Retail
752
No
50 977 Beaumont Ave
Retail
470
No
51 985 Beaumont Ave
Quick Stop Beaumont Liquor Inc.

Market Liquor
2,943
No
52 1001 Beaumont Ave
Ortegas Mattress
Beaumont Bicycle Shop
Beaumont Barber Shop
Citrus Escrow
Retail
1,440
No
53 1002 Beaumont Ave
Retail
2,326
No
54 1012 Beaumont Ave
Services/Offices/B2B
Services/Offices/B2B
Services/Offices/B2B
Services/Offices/B2B
No
55 1037 Beaumont Ave
No
56 1074 Beaumont Ave
Family Chiropractic
New Start Dental
No
57 1080 Beaumont Ave
No
58 1111 Beaumont Ave
Seven Days Market
Hamamura Dennis T, (Optometrist)
The Healing Hut Counseling Center & One of A Kind Boutique India Weaver Mortuary And Crematory
Oak Valley Florist
Beaumont - Cherry Valley Dental
Market Liquor
3,575
No
59 1130 Beaumont Ave
Services/Offices/B2B
Services/Offices/B2B
Services/Offices/B2B
No
60 1132 Beaumont Ave 106
No
61 1177 Beaumont Ave
No
62 1201 Beaumont Ave
Retail
1,983
No
63 1202 Beaumont Ave
Services/Offices/B2B
No
Rocky's Pawn Shop , l6
Formerly Winnow, Inc. Dba Scott's Headers &P u ears 5 f 7t 4 64 100 E 6th St
Free -Standing Retail
Services/Offices/B2B - Yes
4,443 Yes
65 125 E 6th St

EXHIBIT 1

SUMMARY OF COMMERCIAL USE ESTIMATED SQUARE FOOTAGES (THREE BLOCK DOWNTOWN CORE/PROJECT BEAUMONT) Address
Name of Business
Retail Category/
Business Type 1/
Retail and Food/
Square Feet 2/
Visible from
6th Street
66 136 E 6th St C.H.A.R.L.E.E Family Care Inc. Services/Offices/B2B - Yes 67 141 E 6th St Building N/A - Yes
68 150 E 6th St Aggy Furniture
69 163 E 6th St Heating & Air Conditioning Services/Offices/B2B - Yes 70 167 E 6th St Building N/A - Yes
71 195 E 6th St Perozo's Tire Shop Services/Offices/B2B - Yes 72 196 E 6th St D I Y Wedding Rentals & Venue Services/Offices/B2B - Yes 73 200 E 6th St Suite B
Retail
3,960 Yes
The Clock Guy
Services/Offices/B2B - Yes
74 218 E 6th St Prayer Room Services/Offices/B2B - Yes
75 225 E 6th St
Building
N/A - Yes
76 226 E 6th St Thomas Alexander Law Offices Services/Offices/B2B - Yes 77 237 E 6th St Romantique
Retail
1,372 Yes
78A 257 E 6th St Suite A Roots Tattoo Shop Services/Offices/B2B - Yes 78B 257 E 6th St Suite B iPros Phone Repair Services/Offices/B2B - Yes 78C 257 E 6th St Suite C Moore Construction Services/Offices/B2B - Yes 79 271 E 6th St Cornerstone BBQ4/
Food/Dining
700 Yes
80 275 E 6th St Dick's All Auto Repair Inc. Services/Offices/B2B - Yes 81 280 E 6th St House (Broken Window) N/A - Yes
82 296 E 6th St
Mikes Liquor Market
Market Liquor
1,968 Yes
83A 306 E 6th St Womens Club Community Center Services/Offices/B2B - Yes 83B 306 E 6th St Catch A Star Theatrical Players Services/Offices/B2B - Yes 84 307 E 6th St Beach N Air Conditioning & Heating Services/Offices/B2B - Yes 85 311 E 6th St
Farmers Insurance - Steve Rhodd Insurance Agency
Services/Offices/B2B - Yes
86 313 E 6th St Trendy Tangles Services/Offices/B2B - Yes 87 315 E 6th St Aloha Plumbing Services/Offices/B2B - Yes 88 320 E 6th St The Veterinary Surgical Center at Beaumont Services/Offices/B2B - Yes 89 350 E 6th St Generations Antiques & Gifts
90 380 E 6th St Yum Yum Donut Shop # 42
91 381 E 6th St
Retail
4,900 Yes
Food/Dining
Food/Dining
Food/Dining
1,250 Yes
Cafe Agape
140 Yes
92 383 E 6th St East Wall Chinese Restaurant
1,764 Yes
93 385 E 6th St
Formerly Boost Mobile (Now Vacant)
Vacant - Yes
94 387 E 6th St Nestle Nails & Spa Services/Offices/B2B Yes 95 389 E 6th St
Formerly Celebrity Carpets (Now Vacant)
Vacant - Yes
96 410 E 6th St Casa Palacios Mexican Restaurant
Food/Dining
1,155 Yes
97 430 E 6th St Solid Ground Inc. J & Associates Legal Services/Offices/B2B - Yes 98 442 E 6th St Monica's Raggedy Treasures
Retail
885 Yes
99 444 E 6th St
Estate Addicts
Pcno APP of 7.4.4
Retail
2,080 Yes
100 450 E 6th St Beaumont Antique Mall
Retail
5,076 Yes

EXHIBIT 1

SUMMARY OF COMMERCIAL USE ESTIMATED SQUARE FOOTAGES (THREE BLOCK DOWNTOWN CORE/PROJECT BEAUMONT) Address
Name of Business
101 460 E 6th St Antiques
102 480 E 6th St
Retail Category/
Business Type 1/
Retail
Retail and Food/
Square Feet 2/
Visible from
6th Street
5,733 Yes
Andrews Gallery - Garden Decor - Appt. only Retail 3,440 Yes 103 490 E 6th St Supreme Auto Services Services/Offices/B2B - Yes 104 625 Magnolia Ave Beaumont Power Equipment, Inc (STIHL Brand) 105 499 E 6th St Wells Fargo Services/Offices/B2B Yes
106 547 E 6th St Beaumont Realty Inc. Services/Offices/B2B - Yes 107 557 E 6th St Claudia's Beauty Salon Services/Offices/B2B Yes 108 585 E 6th St Classy Consignments Clothing
109 591 E 6th St Schuelke Real Estate Services/Offices/B2B Yes 110 595 E 6th St The Gentleman's Barber Shop Services/Offices/B2B - Yes 111 649 E 6th St Family Dollar
Retail
2,773 Yes
Retail
1,365 Yes
Free -Standing Retail
8,320 Yes
112A 652 E 6th St #A Frijoles Mexican Restaurant
1126 652 E 6th St #B Moneybeans Barber And Beauty Services/Offices/B2B Yes 112C 652 E 6th St #C DRB Store (Groceries)
112D 652 E 6th St #D Beyond Fitness Services/Offices/B2B Yes Food/Dining
3,200 Yes
Market Liquor
1,794 Yes
113 695 E 6th St O'Reilly Auto Part
114 704 E 6th St Senorial Mexican Restaurant
Free -Standing Retail
7,650 Yes
Food/Dining
3,640 Yes
115 743 E 6th St Beaumont Unique Flowers
Retail
946 Yes
116A 770 E 6th St Suite A Real Estate Masters Group & Arrowhead Capital Mortgage Services/Offices/B2B Yes 116B 770 E 6th St Suite D Grand Mountain Jiu Jitsu LLC Services/Offices/B2B - Yes 116C 770 E 6th St Suite F Sky Blue Nails & Spa Services/Offices/B2B Yes 116D 770 E 6th St Suite G
La Michoacana 100% Natural (Ice Cream & Frozen Yogurt, Juice Bars/Smoothies; Food/Dining 1,377 Yes 117A 795 E 6th St Suite B Town & Country Escrow Corp Services/Offices/B2B Yes 117B 795 E 6th St Suite D Gwpos, Inc. (Office) Services/Offices/B2B - Yes 117C 795 E 6th St Suite K Blade Hair Designs Services/Offices/B2B Yes 117D 795 E 6th St Suite G Curtis R Salley D.C. Services/Offices/B2B - Yes 117E 795 E 6th St Suite K Beaumont Massage Therapy Services/Offices/B2B Yes 117F 795 E 6th St Suite C Cynthia Cabanas Insurance Services/Offices/B2B - Yes 117G 795 E 6h St Suite M The Royal Massage Services/Offices/B2B Yes 117H 795 E 6th St Suite H The Pink Ribbon Candy & Gift Shop 1171 795 E 6th St Suite H Eco Insurance Services Services/Offices/B2B - Yes 118 105 W 6th St Beaumont Cleaners Services/Offices/B2B - Yes 119 232 W 6th St Custom Trophies & U-Neek Awards Services/Offices/B2B Yes Retail
450 Yes
120
249 W 6th St
Ramonas Mexican 4/
Food/Dining
5,000 Yes
121 252 W 6th St Battery Barn (Battery Wholesaler) Services/Offices/B2B - Yes 122 615 Egan Ave Saints Realty Inc. Services/Offices/B2B - Yes 123 304 W 6th St Beaumont American Barber Shop
124 345 W 6th St Ziggv's Spirit Shop (Liquor Store)
Pnrrc iR7 of 7.4.4
Services/Offices/B2B - Yes
Market Liquor
1,521 Yes

EXHIBIT 1

SUMMARY OF COMMERCIAL USE ESTIMATED SQUARE FOOTAGES (THREE BLOCK DOWNTOWN CORE/PROJECT BEAUMONT) Address
Name of Business
Retail Category/
Business Type 1/
Retail and Food/
Square Feet 2/
Visible from
6th Street
125 375 W 6th St Class Acts Autobody Inc Services/Offices/B2B - Yes 126 451 W 6th St A & D Golf Carts Services/Offices/B2B - Yes 127 461 W 6th St Omni Engineering, Inc Services/Offices/B2B - Yes 128 502 W 6th St Rapstine's Red Barn
129 521 Wellwood Ave Absolute Cabinets Inc. Services/Offices/B2B - No 130 532 W 5th St House N/A - No
131 506 Wellwood Ave Oaktree Engraving and Monuments Services/Offices/B2B - No 132 515 Egan Ave Felix Auto Repair Services/Offices/B2B - Yes 133 521 Egan Ave House N/A - No
134 246 W 5th St PSI Precision Stampings Services/Offices/B2B - No 135 500 Grace Ave Previous Beaumont Unified School District N/A No 136 529 Grace Ave Warehouse N/A - No
137 531 Grace Ave Warehouse N/A - No
138 172 E 5th St House N/A - No
139 258 E 5th St Beaumont Precision Machining N/A - No
140 288 E 5th St House N/A - No
141 296 E 5th St House N/A - No
142 325 E 5th St Lee's Auto Body Services/Offices/B2B - No 143 326 E 5th St House N/A - No
144 373 E 5th St Stallion's Inner City Auto Services/Offices/B2B - No 145 480 E 5th St Hotel Salina (Formerly Motel 6) Hotel - No 146 625 E 5th St Americas Best Value Inn Hotel - No
Retail
7,830 Yes
147 655 E 5th St #B Beaumont Tire Services/Offices/B2B - No 148 550 Maple Ave Wines Chiropractic Office Services/Offices/B2B - No 149 650 Maple Ave House N/A - No
150 560 Magnolia Ave Beaumont Cherry Valley Water Distrct Services/Offices/B2B - No 151 540 Euclid Ave
Navarro Stone (Cabinets, Granite, Sinks, Faucets, Quartz, etc.) Retail 6,195 No 152 520 Edgar Ave Apartment N/A - No
153 531 Edgar Ave Well Tec - Pump and Water Well Service Services/Offices/B2B - No 154A 551 Edgar Ave JS Cabinets Storage Services/Offices/B2B - No 1546 555 Edgar Ave JS Cabinets Services/Offices/B2B No
155A 514 N California Ave P R R 0 LLC Services/Offices/B2B - No 1556 514 N California Ave Professional Family Solutions Foundation Services/Offices/B2B No 155C 514 N California Ave Suite #4 Care Givers Galore Services/Offices/B2B - No 156 520 N California Ave City of Beaumont Maintenance Transit Parking Lot 157 552 N California Ave T & M Mufflers Services/Offices/B2B - No City Lot No
158 580 N California Ave Integrity Construction & Remodeling, Inc. Services/Offices/B2B No

159 364 E 7th St Golden Paw Grooming Services/Offices/B2B - No

EXHIBIT 1

SUMMARY OF COMMERCIAL USE ESTIMATED SQUARE FOOTAGES (THREE BLOCK DOWNTOWN CORE/PROJECT BEAUMONT) Address
160 372 E 7th St
Name of Business
The Highlight Hair Salon
Habitat For Humanity
Retail Category/
Business Type 1/
Services/Offices/B2B
Services/Offices/B2B
Retail and Food/
Square Feet 2/
Visible from
6th Street
No
161 738 Euclid Ave
No
Retail and Food
Square Footage (SF) 3/
% of Total Retail and Food SF
Markets/Liquor SF
19,093
13%
Free -Standing Retail Businesses
25,813
18%
Other Retail SF
62,606
43%
Food SF 5/
36,719
25%
Total Combined Retail and Food SF
144,231
100%
Note: LSCA Estimates, Preliminary Vacancy Assumptions.

Services/Offices/B2B: Includes wholesale businesses and light manufacturing. 2/ Square footages roughly estimated based on Google Maps measuring. 3/ Excludes services/offices & "B2B," (Business to business uses). 4/ Square footages per stakeholder interviews.
5/ Former Thai Air Space is currently vacant. A taco shop is planned to replace it. Current occupied food space is 36,719 less 1,600 sf or 35,119 as of 7/23.

EX 1A
Downtown Beaumont Core Three Block Walking Distance
Cie citi
41)
0 et
CD
cp
0 •
•
F
I
a
0 0
eo 00.00
CD Q
0 0
a
L 5Ih S1
2 A
i
3 0
17 not rX I n
0 •
4 MP
•
E 41 K St
• See I
j. F1 Ln
2 I
f
Mb Sr.
ti
•
ray r r•:-7!

EX 1B
North Beaumont Avenue

EX 1C
Far North Beaumont Avenue
Z.
o-

1. S
F
E
I
9 S
I-
170, Si

EX 1 D
West 6th Street from Edgar Avenue to Freeway 10

EX 1 E
East 6th Street from Maple to Pennsylvania
F Ph t[
•
61h St
•
f
L 571 Si
I
Sus
lAuto Tire Uses
EfFiligt
Auto Tire Uses
r
F
Red4ends;war
Beyond Food U/C
. i y emI,ylGUAM ,-)

1.Mo.:1rF Mi1C- iA

EXHIBIT 2

BEAUMONT-SERVING REGIONAL AND GROCERY STORE ANCHORED CENTERS Key to City
Corridor Map 2/
Name/Center Type
Location
Anchor/ Mini Anchor & Key
Stores
Total
Square Footage
Vacant & Available Space
Description
Est. Vacant
Square Feet 1/
Drive Time
From Core
Vacancies & Comments

EXISTING CENTERS
1 Marketplace Beaumont
1610-1672 Highland Springs Avenue
NW S Highland Springs Ave & E 2nd St
Beaumont, CA 92223
Best Buy
Petco
Aldi
Ross Dress For Less
GameStop
Wienerschnitzel
Juice It Up!
Panda Express
La Casita
Wingstop
Taco Bell
Starbucks
187,500
Small shop
Bed Bath & Beyond
Small shop
Small shop
Small shop
Small shop
1,000
25,000
4,548
1,652
1,562
1,922
7 Minutes
Per leasing agent, Terry Bortnick of Axiom Retail
Advisors (888-301-1888 x 2), Bed Bath & Beyond
space is available for lease due to financial
uncertainties of retailer and possible bankruptcy.

The tenant will remain temporarily open. The
Anytime Fitness space of 4,548 s.f. was recently
taken back by the landlord, and is available. The
Firehouse Subs space of 1,922 space is technically
available, but the landlord is under negotiations to
renew the space with the tenant. Asking rents
range from $2.00 to $2.25 per s.f. per month, with
.80 per s.f. per month for total extra charges. Total
35,684 s.f. available for lease.
2 Walmart Supercenter
1540 E 2nd St
Beaumont, CA 92223
Walmart Supercenter
230,600
N/A
0 6 Minutes
Free-standing Walmart store, no small shops space.

S.F. per Placer.ai.
3 The Home Depot & Big Lots Center 1/
1480 E 2nd St
Beaumont, CA 92223
Home Depot
Big Lots
Tire Services
117,400
35,000
5,100
N/A
0 6 Minutes
Three free-standing pads only, no small shops
space.
4 Dollar Tree Center
1486 E 2nd St
Beaumont, CA 92223
Dollar Tree
Chili's Grill & Bar
McDonald's
El Pollo Loco
Wells Fargo
42,500
Small shop
1,000
6 Minutes
Per Vicky Espinosa of CBRE (909-418-2120), only
one space of 1,000 s.f. is technically vacant, the
Fantastic Sam's space. However, the landlord has
received a rent offer from the Fantastic Sam's
franchisee and if this deal is completed, no spaces
are available or vacant. Asking rent is $3.00 per s.f.
per month ($36 per s.f. per year).
5 Kohl's
1479 E 2nd St
Beaumont, CA 92223
Kohl's
91,000
N/A
0 5 Minutes
Free-standing Kohl's store, no small shops space.
6 2nd Street Cinema (Cinema West)
1491 E 2nd St
Beaumont, CA 92223
2nd Street Cinema
35,302
N/A
0 5 Minutes
Free-standing 12 -screen cinema, no small shops
space. Owned by Cinema West, independent
owner of about 16 cinemas, mostly in California,
with two in Idaho.

EXHIBIT 2

BEAUMONT-SERVING REGIONAL AND GROCERY STORE ANCHORED CENTERS Key to City
Name/Center Type
Anchor/ Mini Anchor & Key
Total
Vacant & Available Space
Est. Vacant
Drive Time
Vacancies & Comments
Corridor Map 2/
Location
Stores
Square Footage
Description
Square Feet 1/
From Core

EXISTING CENTERS
7 Grocery Outlet Center 1/
Grocery Outlet
18,000
N/A
0 5 Minutes
Small shop spaces include: Nekter Juice Bar, Cookie
1575 E 2nd St
Planet Fitness
18,000
Co., Flip Flop Shops, Sharetea, Bright Now Dental &
Beaumont, CA 92223
Small Shops Next To Grocery (4)
8,100
Orthodontics, Bath & Body Works. No vacancies
In -N -Out Pad
5,500
observed. Estimated total square footage of
Raising Cane's Chicken Pad
3,500
84,600.

Ulta Beauty
10,000
Five Below
10,000
Shop Spaces (6 Shops)
12,500
8 Rite Aid Center 1/
Rite Aid
14,608
N/A
0 6 Minutes
Food pad building has unusual rear drive thru, that
1660 E 1st St
Fast5Xpress Car Wash
8,500
is only for Panera Bread, and requiring going in
Beaumont, CA 92223
Sonic Drive -In
Pad With Panera Bread, Dental Office,
Pieology, Ono Hawaiian
6,000
11,401
back of building. Estimated total s.f. of 52,709. No
vacancies observed.

Les Schwab Tire Center
12,200
9 Beaumont Center 1/
1663-1679 E 6th St
Beaumont, CA 92223
Stater Bros. Market
Food 4 Less
111,762
N/A
0 6 Minutes
Small shops include services and quick foods. Very
atypical to see two grocery stores anchoring a
single center. Per CoStar, Food 4 Less s.f. is 50,638
s.f. and Stater Bros s.f. is 29,780 s.f. No vacancies
observed.
10 Oak Valley Towne Center
Stater Bros. Market
70,900
N/A
0 4 Minutes
No vacancies observed. Older, small, North
1400 Beaumont Ave
Beaumont, CA 92223
Walgreens
Beaumont grocery store anchored center. Services
and food within small amounts of small shop space.
11 Oak Valley Plaza
890 Oak Valley Pkwy
Beaumont, CA 92223
Rite Aid
Domenico's
Oak Valley Chevron (Separate Owner)
38,347
N/A
0 6 Minutes
Small neighborhood center. Domenico's Italian
restaurant (Yelp 4) adjacent to outdoor dining
patio. Other restaurants include a sports bar and
sushi restaurant (both Yelp 3.5). Rite Aid is 17,272
s.f. per CoStar. No vacancies observed.
12 Sun Lakes Village
Albertsons
231,306
Small shop
1,750
6 Minutes
Per leasing brochure PetSmart and Boot Barn are
300 S Highland Springs Ave
Hobby Lobby
Small shop
2,438
coming soon. Albertons per CoStar is 41,630 s.f.

Banning, CA 92220
Marshalls
Mobil Gas Station (Separate Owner)
Space bet'n Marshalls &
Hobby Lobby
20,000
Three solid small restaurants with modest interiors,
two rated Yelp 4 (Duramaya Japanese & Patsy's
Country Kitchen) and Surin Thai rated Yelp 4.5.

EXHIBIT 2

BEAUMONT-SERVING REGIONAL AND GROCERY STORE ANCHORED CENTERS Key to City
Corridor Map 2/
Name/Center Type
Location
Anchor/ Mini Anchor & Key
Stores
Total
Square Footage
Vacant & Available Space
Description
Est. Vacant
Square Feet 1/
Drive Time
From Core
Vacancies & Comments

EXISTING CENTERS
13 The Marketplace at Calimesa
Cherry Valley Blvd &I-10 Frwy
1040 Cherry Valley Blvd
Calimesa, CA 92320
Stater Bros. Market
102,700
N/A
0 8 Minutes
Owner Lewis Retail, is pre -leasing 8,149 square
feet on East side of Stater Bros. Market. Urgent
care facility not yet occupied adjacent to dental
office but shown on leasing plan. Notable food use
is free-standing 3,000 sf Fire Rock Burger & Brews
(Yelp 4), with a limited burger and beer menu, with
live entertainment, targeting local families. No
vacancies observed.

LARGE RETAIL CENTERS 10 MINUTES EAST
1 Cabazon Outlets
48750 Seminole Drive #100
Cabazon, CA 92230
Adidas
Columbia Sportswear
Oakley Vault
PUMA
Sunglass Hut
Tilly's
Under Armour
67,643
N/A
0 10 Minutes
Smaller outlet center owned by Northern California
developer, Craig Realty Group. Only 17 tenants
with center thriving off of the success of adjacent
outlet center. Only one small quick food use. No
available spaces per CoStar.
2 Desert Hills Premium Outlets
48400 Seminole Drive
Cabazon, CA 92230
Alexander McQueen
AliSaints
Balenciaga
Bottega Veneta
Burberry
Calvin Klein
Christian Louboutin
Dolce & Gabbana
Fendi
Gucci
Jimmy Choo
Moncler
Prada
Saint Laurent
Salvatore Ferragamo
The North Face
Valentino
Versace
651,433
N/A
0 10 Minutes
One of the most successful, high -performing per sf
sales, open air centers owned by Simon Property
Group. Serves as "regional mall" for Beaumont
residents searching for name -brand premium and
luxury apparel, gifts, and other upscale retail. Few
dining offerings, mostly quick and fast foods in food
court. Center draws from entire Southern
California region, as well as visitors to the Coachella Valley. Saks Off 5th is large mini -anchor of 25,433
s.f. No available spaces per CoStar.

EXHIBIT 2

BEAUMONT-SERVING REGIONAL AND GROCERY STORE ANCHORED CENTERS Key to City
Corridor Map 2/
Name/Center Type
Location
Anchor/ Mini Anchor & Key
Stores
Total
Square Footage
Vacant & Available Space
Description
Est. Vacant
Square Feet 1/
Drive Time
From Core
Vacancies & Comments

EXISTING CENTERS
BEAUMONT-SERVING ANCHORED CENTERS S.F. 1,437,726
TOTAL REGIONAL & NEIGHBORHOOD -SERVING CENTER S.F.: 2,156,802 VACANT SPACE 60,872
PERCENT VACANT 4.2% Excludes Cabazon Outlets and Desert Hills Sources: LoopNet; Leasing brochures; 2022 Directory of Leading Chain Tenants; CoStar; Place.ai; L.S. Congleton & Associates field research; Interviews with property owner/representatives; Google maps area calculator (S.F.). Drive times calculated using core downtown; 6th St & Beaumont Ave. 1/ Square footage estimated using Google Maps.
2/ See Exhibits 2A -2C for corridor map.

EX 2A - Regional & Beaumont Grocery Store Anchored Centers Competition Map Existing Centers
0 Marketplace Beaumont
Q
Walmart Supercenter
0 The Home Depot & Big Lots
Q
Dollar Tree Center
0 Kohl's
a
2nd Street Cinema
0 Grocery Outlet Center
0 Rite Aid Center
0 Beaumont Center
Oak Valley Towne Center
•
Oak Valley Plaza
•
Sun Lakes Village
The Marketplace at Calimesa
Large Retail Centers East
Q
Cabazon Outlets
0 Desert Hills Premium Outlets
OD
kki
Merry VITep tu+d
Bicoisdc Are
'y.1 -4.708-.I Cr
fix': airy May
Chtrry VaLleyr
�r,?Gki L ti4
11116ey now,
r
R
d5 opiim +l-54ski
EtiI.�7
HlyhI (id
Springs
P," Wh1san
Wee sn 1 L
+'r LingNn I
A1cRCINGO
RESET VATION1
41)47,0
as nflrnfl

EX 2B- Regional & Beaumont Grocery Store Anchored Centers Competition Map (Beaumont Only) Existing Centers
0 Marketplace Beaumont
Q
Walmart Supercenter
0 The Home Depot & Big Lots
Q
Dollar Tree Center
0 Kohl's
a
2nd Street Cinema
Grocery Outlet Center
Q
Rite Aid Center
0 Beaumont Center
Oak Valley Towne Center
Oak Valley Plaza
•
Sun Lakes Village
The Marketplace at Calimesa
•
i
i
k
1 I
1 Ch.uri V'.il ei.a
Cherry L .

1. 9rco.sde +a Do41ksdeAre Th Al2Ash
s Ni
■il 111111111i
_dhlilhlllii.i.ii.

Be Du mom s;
4 79 1
•

IARNSUI N
Higf and
Springs
00 0
w
01000
1111/131 - i•amadAk
Mao .iris 02073 Eti gk

EX 2C - Close -Up of Regional Highland Springs Corridor Map Existing Centers
0 Marketplace Beaumont
Q
Walmart Supercenter
0 The Home Depot & Big Lots
0 Dollar Tree Center
0 Kohl's
a
2nd Street Cinema
0 Grocery Outlet Center
0 Rite Aid Center
0 Beaumont Center
E 9Rh R
E 111. t
Redwood sr
OAV UE!IJaWV
a+.+1 VIM Ord
Redlands Fury
E Otiti $R
0 E2nd'S! E2i►45i
el 1011
E15RSt ElsiS1
m
15 15 LelaThi
1 M
=; Erelfe Sc 8 Pr
< LI:•
CI t
FI inning° Si
Potruo Blvd
PGRrere• EPod
0 'idg PIo
Memory: Dr
1 2
4Rh St a w Ramsey st
WRarnaey SR

13. rb
i'1
okitft

•
EXHIBIT 3
BEAUMONT AND REGIONAL SUMMARY OF NOTABLE DINING (YELP RATED 4 AND ABOVE), 2022-2023 Map
Key 21
Name/Location/City
Yelp Rating
Drive Time from
Downtown Core
Type
Menu
Comments
BEAUMONT"
Full -service Restaurants 1
1 Domenico's Italian Kitchen
890 Oak Valley Pkwy
Beaumont, CA 92223
4 613 Reviews
6 Minutes
Restaurant
2,400 s.f.
(Est.)
Italian
Sports Bar
Pizza
Located in Oak Valley Plaza (Rite Aid Center); outlet offers take-out and dining - in, with large outdoor patior in back.
2 Tuscanos Pizza & Pasta
762 Beaumont Ave
Beaumont, CA 92223
4 54 Reviews
1 Minute
Restaurant
3,000 s.f.

Italian
Desserts
Pizza
Located between 7th and 8th Street on Beaumont Avenue. Restaurant has spacious indoor seating, as well as take-out. Exterior has metal roll down windows. Outlet offers party trays. Restaurant also has larger locations in Yucaipa and La Quinta.
3 Frijoles Mexican Restaurant
652 E 6th Street
Beaumont, CA 92223
4 222 Reviews
1 Minute
Restaurant
3,200 s.f.
(Est.)
Mexican
Bar
Caterer
Located adjacent to City Hall. Traditional Mexican Restaurant with wall murals.

Counter ordering, with indoor and outdoor seating areas. 4 Ramona's Restaurant
249 W 6th Street
Beaumont, CA 92223

3.5 222 Reviews
(Tripadvisor Rated 4)
6 Minutes
Quick Casual
5,000 s.f.

Mexican
Free-standing, family -owned, 51 -year -old traditional Mexican restaurant with its own parking lot. Small outdoor patio area in front. Good service and classic Mexican offerings.

Quick Casual
5 Cornerstone BBQ
271 E 6th Street
Beaumont, CA 92223

4.5 193 Reviews
1 Minute
Take -Out
700 s.f.

BBQ
Caterer
Soul Food
Very small, high -quality BBQ outlet. Mostly Take-out and catering. Small outdoor dining area in back. Serves breakfast, lunch and dinner. Open Wednesdays through Sundays.
6 Cafe Agape
381 E 6th St
Beaumont, CA 92223

4.5 307 Reviews
1 Minute
Take -Out
140 s.f.
(Trailer est.)
Coffee & Tea
Bagels
Juices & Smoothies
Small blue, metal trailer offering take -away coffees, teas, oatmeal, bagels, pastries and smoothies. Excellent service and quality. High number of menu offerings. A strong local following, including a "membership club" offering free drinks with frequent purchases. No outdoor seating, drive -through only. 7 The Craft Lounge Taproom & Bottleshop
690 N Beaumont Ave
Beaumont, CA 92223
5 56 Reviews
1 Minute
Quick Casual
1,750 s.f.

Lounge
Craft Beer Bar
Unique beer lounge with top-quality craft California beers. Outlet offers board games, karoke nights, entertainment and bands. Owner partners with food vendors who offer a wide range of quality "quick eats." Open week nights 4:00 to 10:00 p.m., Saturday noon to 11 p.m. and Sunday noon to 8:00 p.m. 8 Fuego Cravings
1680 E 6th Street
Beaumont, CA 92223
4 320 Reviews
6 Minutes
Quick Casual
1,500 s.f.
(Est.)
Mexican
Speciality birria "quick casual dining" with contemporary indoor setting and good counter service. No physical menus, only TV screen with small font.

Other locations in Upland, Rancho Cucamonga, Rolling Hills and Covina. 9 Dutch Bros Coffee
1675 E 8th St
Beaumont, CA 92223
N/A
Only open a few
months
5 Minutes
Take -Out
N.A.

Coffee & Tea
Juice Bars
Smoothies
Recently open in April, 2023. Drive -through only.

BANNING
Full -service Restaurants

EXHIBIT 3
BEAUMONT AND REGIONAL SUMMARY OF NOTABLE DINING (YELP RATED 4 AND ABOVE), 2022-2023 Map
Key
Name/Location/City
Yelp Rating
Downtown Core Drive Time from
Type
Menu
Comments
II
1 The Station TapHouse
41 W Ramsey St
Banning, CA 92220

4.5 394 Reviews
11 Minutes
Restaurant
American
Gastropub
Sport Bar
Large restaurant in historic, old -town Banning.
2 Papaya Bay
575 W Ramsey St
Banning, CA 92220
4 496 Reviews
9 Minutes
Restaurant
Thai
Cafe with authentic Thai interior with old-style furniture. 3 Darumaya
300 S Highland Springs Ave
Banning, CA 92220

4.5 410 Reviews
7 Minutes
Restaurant
Sushi Bar
Ramen
Noodles
Located in Sun Lakes Village Shopping Center (Albertson's-anchored).

Excellent Japanese food, very small restaurant.
4 Senorial Mexican Restaurant
1675 W Ramsey St
Banning, CA 92220

4.5 378 Reviews
10 Minutes
Restaurant
Mexican
Small restaurant with scenic -painted old-style booths. Estimated 3,500 SF. 5 Consuelo's Home Style Mexican Food
1046 E Ramsey St
Banning, CA 92220

4.5 486 Reviews
11 Minutes
Restaurant
Mexican
No sit down dining offered post-Covid. Only take-out service. 6 Guy's Italian Restaurant
5970 W Ramsey St
Banning, CA 92220
4 400 Reviews
5 Minutes
Restaurant
Italian
Desserts
Modest, small Italian, free-standing, restaurant.
7 Surin Thai Restaurant
300 S Highland Springs Ave Ste 6B
Banning, CA 92220

4.5 151 Reviews
8 Minutes
Restaurant
Thai
Located in Sun Lakes Village Shopping Center (Albertson's), with 2 other solid restaurants, Darumaya and Patsy's Kitchen. Open casual atmosphere, resonably priced, solid Thai food in small outlet.
8 Patsy's Country Kitchen
300 S Highland Springs Ave
Banning, CA 92220
4 394 Reviews
8 Minutes
Restaurant
American (Traditional)
Breakfast & Brunch
Diners
Located in Sun Lakes Village (Albertson's). Large windows, classic diner style, traditional seating and food. Generous portions and excellent breakfast offerings.

Quick Casual 1
9 Taqueria Orozco
1987 W Ramsey St
Banning, CA 92220

4.5 44 Reviews
11 Minutes
Quick Casual
Mexican
Tacos
Lime white building, fast casual, fresh pastries. Drive -through.

NORTHERN CITIES
Full -service Restaurants

EXHIBIT 3
BEAUMONT AND REGIONAL SUMMARY OF NOTABLE DINING (YELP RATED 4 AND ABOVE), 2022-2023 Map
Key
Name/Location/City
Yelp Rating
Drive Time from
Downtown Core
Type
Menu
Comments
1 City Sushi & Grill
10370 Beaumont Ave
Cherry Valley, CA 92223
4 293 Reviews
7 Minutes
Restaurant
Japanese
Sushi Bar
Wide menu, inlcudes Japanese and Korean. Bar seating. Spacious interior, estimated 2,500 S.F.
2 Fire Rock Burgers & Brews
1040 Cherry Valley Blvd
Calimesa, CA 92320
4 36 Reviews
8 Minutes
Restaurant
Burgers
Beer Bar
Free-standing building with limited menu of burgers, sides and beers. Live entertainment offered. Located relatively new center, The Marketplace at Calimesa. Family -oriented atmosphere.
3 Kluddes Smokehouse + Saloon
35034 Yucaipa Blvd
Yucaipa, CA 92399
4 58 Reviews
16 Minutes
Restaurant
American
New entrepreneurial restaurant in formerly renovated "bank vault" building.

Menu includes Tri-Tip, brisket, burgers, pork, tacos, smoked and grilled meats, sliders, numerous sides. Opened after Covid.
4 Bella & Yang
12045 5th St
Yucaipa, CA 92399
4 156 Reviews
15 Minutes
Restaurant
Chinese
Sushi Bars
Estimated near 5,000 S.F., very large, with atypical blend of Chinese and Japanese offerings. Located in a 99 cent center. Contemporary and modem interiors, and unusually large interior for sushi bar offerings. 5 Yu Thai Pa
35134 Yucaipa Blvd
Yucaipa, CA 92399

4.5 84 Reviews
15 Minutes
Restaurant
Thai
Desserts
Noodles
Small, modest Thai outlet.
6 Uptown Wine Merchant
35018 Yucaipa Blvd Ste 1
Yucaipa, CA 92399

4.5 68 Reviews
Restaurant
Wine Tasting Room
Beer
Wine & Spirits
New entrepreneurial offering with a variety of selected wines. Building adjacted to Woodhaus, allowing patrons to bring in take-out pizza and food. Open since Covid.
7 Woodhaus
35010 Yucaipa Blvd
Yucaipa, CA 92399

4.5 57 Reviews
16 Minutes
Restaurant
Pizza
Wine Bar
Beer Bar
Tiny wood -fried pizza outlet adjacent to Uptown Wine Merchant. 8 The Haus Bistro
534 Myrtlewood Dr
Calimesa, CA 92320

4.5 309 Reviews
9 Minutes
Restaurant
Bar
American
European
New entrepreneurial restaurant with charming spacious interior. Brick exterior with aesthetic patio seating. Schnitzel is special menu offering. Friendly service.
9 Grandlund's Restaurant & Candies
12194 California St
Yucaipa, CA 92399
4 108 Reviews
16 Minutes
Restaurant
American (New)
"Main Street Disneyland" -like, colorful interior in what appears to be a former house, decorated with bright colors and a red -tiled ice cream bar. 10 Ocean Pho
33527 Yucaipa Blvd Ste C3
Yucaipa, CA 92399
4 307 Reviews
15 Minutes
Restaurant
Vietnamese
Noodles
Sandwiches
Small Vietnamese outlet in strip center next to Italia Bella (see below). 11 21 Sushi House
530 Myrtlewood Dr
Calimesa, CA 92320
4 349 Reviews
10 Minutes
Restaurant
Sushi Bar
Japanese
Located adjacent to The Haus Bistro in Calimesa. Upside down umbrella decoration attatched to ceiling, with small gift items at front of the shop.

Page484of744

EXHIBIT 3
BEAUMONT AND REGIONAL SUMMARY OF NOTABLE DINING (YELP RATED 4 AND ABOVE), 2022-2023 Map
Key
Name/Location/City
Yelp Rating
Drive Time from
Downtown Core
Type
Menu
Comments
Quick Casual .
_
12 Italia Bella
33527 Yucaipa Blvd Ste C1
Yucaipa, CA 92399
5 182 Reviews
15 Minutes
Quick Casual
Desserts
Sandwiches
Sicilian
Take-out only.
13 Damasco Mediterranean Cusine
35045 Avenue D
Yucaipa, CA 92399
5 414 Reviews
16 Minutes
Quick Casual
Mediterranean
Syrian
Tiny operation with take-out only.
14 Two Ladds Bakery
10420 Beaumont Ave
Cherry Valley, CA 92223

4.5 177 Reviews
6 Minutes
Quick Casual
Bakeries
Sandwiches
Creperies
Gourmet bakery offeirngs near border of Beaumont & Cherry Valley on busy road, Beaumont Avenue.
15 Hops and Spokes Brewing Company
34324 Yucaipa Blvd Ste A
Yucaipa, CA 92399

4.5 52 Reviews
16 Minutes
Quick Casual
Brewery
New entrepreneur in Yucaipa with high quality interior and offerings. No food offered, but partners with food vendors outside. Owner brews its own quality craft beer. Open since Covid.

CABAZON
Full -service Restaurants
1 Cielo
49500 Seminole Dr Fl 27
Cabazon, CA 92230
4 569 Reviews
14 Minutes
Restaurant
Seafood
Steakhouse
Cocktail Bar
High -end, large, formal restaurant located upper level of casino, with broad view of mountains.
2 Good Times Cafe
49500 Seminole Dr
Cabazon, CA 92230
4 226 Reviews
15 Minutes
Restaurant
American (Traditional)
Pizza
Breakfast & Brunch
Casual, highly popular bar -dining inside casino serving burgers, Brick Oven pizza, sandwiches, salads, pasta, desserts.

Sources: Yelp, Google, Tripadvisor; L.S. Congleton & Associates field research; Google maps area calculator (S.F.). Drive times calculated using core downtown; 6th St & Beaumont Ave. 11 Included square footages for Beaumont restaurants only to illustrate the small sizes of spaces in the City. v See Exhibit 3A for map key.

EX 3A - Map of Beaumont Restaurants (Yelp Rated 4 and Above) Beaumont Restaurants & Quick
Casual
0 Domenico's
0 Tuscano's Pizza & Pasta
0 Frijoles Restaurant
a
Ramona's Restaurant
Q
Cornerstone BBQ
0 Cafe Agape
0 The Craft Lounge Taproom &
Bottleshop
Q
Fuego Cravings
0 Dutch Bros Coffee (Open 4/23)
Fe.
-004101110
�iS�tale CF2k
A
1 Oak Valley Pkwy
,F4
eldlOrEr10 Var. Fwy
Oak Valley Pkwy E oak Vlyr Pkwy E Oak lily Pkwy
2 CyrioF tra 8
g
b
p `t.

Elwerroo SS 4 10 -
w
•S
fio
O
• > 7 IFSL
a
4e1 INh}JfI3 N
Wgib Si.
any lUwP'10*9
E 13th 5.

E12FSi
2 E �111F$l
E;CM Es1
E91hsi
u
r,. 0E flah . mdIr1t
•
V 105
w-0LhSL &Fes& kg 7q E.41
I
;
rf
a
€'
{
.1.
.. >}
Eut.IX,Il1,1y 1.'r
Fu.h:,a Dr
3 8
cophisi
.411111
7-7
w1Li51
5;
E1stSt E19t5i
4 E 1st St
E Oak VFy *1'e)'
r.S s'_laroe Ey
lax
•Y
•
TiBr flow&
LIpc
71 �f #fir $,,kp
,„ .
3 Aniditoca
4:421.19Ars4„cie
(2 air
,fie e
I:
sa 1
kr ....

Li
RMill
R way
strt$r�e Dr I'�' �
Ik e
`dry =e 5 � 111
�,,k I J 5.4 WI
Dr
l'
l' \ dkl"r3.2 Sal 1:11 ,& .1
si,a11 rtil w}y
+r�L Le.

E 8th St
n �
Redranes Fwy
0 4
EitSt E JP
C 2rrd $t 1
Elyta EMS"
$y�
udar'I Sri
1441) dra X433 I op o

EXHIBIT 36

SUMMARY OF NOTABLE DOWNTOWN

DINING SQUARE FOOTAGES IN BEAUMONT
2023
KEYv NAME S.F.
2 Tuscanos Pizza & Pasta 3,000
3 Frijoles Mexican Restaurant 3,200
4 Ramona's Restaurant 5,000
5 Cornerstone BBQ 700
6 Cafe Agape 140
7 The Craft Lounge Taproom & Bottleshop 1,750
Total Square Footage Existing 13,790
Average Size of 6 Existing Restaurants 2,298
v See Exhibit 3 for map key.

EXHIBIT 4
NEW CURRENTLY -SELLING FOR -SALE RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS IN BEAUMONT (AS OF APRIL - JUNE, 2023) SHOWN IN EXHIBIT 4A Name / Location / # Units
Model
Starting Price Ranges
(Available Homes)
SF Ranges
Starting Price/S.F. Ranges
Bedroom Count
Amenities
Drive Times
Augusta at The Fairways by D.R.

Residence 1342
(1 -Story)
S464.465
1,342
$346.10
3 Single family detatched unit with 2 bathrooms and 2
car garage. $176 HOA fees.
9 Minutes
Horton
11921 Price St, Beaumont, CA
92223
268 SFD
1,342 - 2,617 s.f.

Residence 1865
(1 -Story)
$543,990
1,865
$291.68
4 Single family detatched unit with 3 bathrooms and 2
car garage. $176 HOA fees.

Residence 1986
(2 -Story)
$516,140
1,986
$259.89
3 Single family detatched unit with 2.5 bathrooms and 2 car garage. $176 HOA fees.

Residence 2065 t
(2 -Story)
$541,000
2,065
$261.99
4 Single family detatched unit with 3 bathrooms and 2
car garage. $176 HOA fees.

Residence 2259
(2 -Story)
$531,990
2,259
$235.50
4 Single family detatched unit with 3 bathrooms and 2
car garage. $176 HOA fees.

Residence 2617 if
(2 -Story)
N/A
2,617
N/A
4 Single family detatched unit with 3.5 bathrooms and 2 car garage. $176 HOA fees.

Seasons at The Fairways by
Pearl Lot
(2 -Story)
$589,245
2,370
$248.63
4 Single family detatched unit with 3 bathrooms and 2
car garage. $176 HOA fees.
10 Minutes
Richmond American Homes
35514 Roxy Rd, Beaumont, CA
92223
62 SFD
2,370 - 3,040 s.f.

Tourmaline
(2 -Story)
$613,075
2,681
$228.67
4 Single family detatched unit with 3 bathrooms and 2
car garage. $176 HOA fees.

Ammolite t
(2 -Story)
$656,677
3,040
$216.01
5 Single family detatched unit with 3.5 bathrooms and 2 car garage. $176 HOA fees.

Big Canyon at the Fairways by
Plan 1
(1 -Story)
$524,990
2,023
$259.51
3 to 4
Single family detatched unit with 3 bathrooms and 2
car garage.
10 Minutes
Woodside Homes
35537 Roxy Rd, Beaumont, CA,
92223
73 SFD
2,023 - 3,090 s.f.

Plan 2
(2 -Story)
$565,990
2,720
$208.08
3 to 5
Single family detatched unit with 3 bathrooms and 2
car garage.

Plan 3
(2 -Story)
$598,990
3,090
$193.85
3 to 7
Single family detatched unit with 3-5 bathrooms and 2-
3 car garage.

RidgeView at the Fairways by
Plan 1
(1 -Story)
$464,247
1,432
$324.19
2 Single family detatched unit with 2 bathrooms and 2
car garage.
10 Minutes
Woodside Homes
11541 Jack St, Beaumont, CA,
92223
126 SFD
1,432 - 2,362 s.f.

Plan 2
(2 -Story)
$497,500
2,024
$245.80
4 Single family detatched unit with 3 bathrooms and 2
car garage.

Plan 3
(2 -Story)
$518,000
2,227
$232.60
4 Single family detatched unit with 3 bathrooms and 2
car garage.

Plan 4
(2 -Story)
$522,500
2,362
$221.21
4 Single family detatched unit with 3 bathrooms and 2
car garage.

EXHIBIT 4
NEW CURRENTLY -SELLING FOR -SALE RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS IN BEAUMONT (AS OF APRIL - JUNE, 2023) SHOWN IN EXHIBIT 4A Name / Location / # Units
Model
Starting Price Ranges
(Available Homes)
SF Ranges
Starting Price/S.F. Ranges
Bedroom Count
Amenities
Drive Times
Meritage Homes at The Fairways
Azalea at The
Fairways
$492,000
1,628 2,948
$302.21 $166.89
3 to 5
Single family detatched unit with 2.5-3 bathrooms and
2-3 car garage.
10 Minutes
'Pre -Sales(
35241 Braid PI, Beaumont, CA
92223
287 SFD
Move -Ins 7/23
Magnolia at The
Fairways
$580,595
2,176 3,153
$266.82 $184.14
4 to 5
Single family detatched unit with 2.5-3 bathrooms and
2-3 car garage.

Holly at The Fairways
$677,295

2.527 3,247
$268.02 $208.59
4 to 5
Single family detatched unit with 3.5 bathrooms and 2-
3 car garage.

Crown at Tournament Hills by Tri
Bristol Plan 1
(1 -Story)
$445,000
1,541
$288.77
3 Single family detatched unit with 2 bathrooms and 2
car garage.
9 Minutes
Pointe Homes (Pre -Sales)
Oak Valley Parkway, Beaumont,
California 92223
144 SFD
1,541- 2,049 s.f.

Juniper Plan 2
(1 -Story)
$466,000
1,908
$244.23
3 to 4
Single family detatched unit with 2 bathrooms and 2
car garage.

Rosewood Plan 3
(2 -Story)
$469,000
2,049
$228.89
4 Single family detatched unit with 3 bathrooms and 2
car garage.

Virtue at Tournament Hills by Tri
Cypress Plan 1
(2 -Story)
$448,000
1,741
$257.32
3 Single family detatched unit with 2.5 bathrooms and 2 car garage.
9 Minutes
Pointe Homes (Pre -Sales)
Oak Valley Parkway, Beaumont,
California 92223
124 SFD
1,741- 2,195 s.f.

Ivy Plan 2
(2 -Story)
$457,000
1,957
$233.52
3 to 4
Single family detatched unit with 2.5-3 bathrooms and
2 car garage.

Torrey Plan 3
(2 -Story)
$480,000
2,195
$218.68
4 Single family detatched unit with 3 bathrooms and 2
car garage.

Olivewood by Taylor Morrison (15
Plan 3
(2 -Story)
$503,990
1,966
$256.35
3 Single family detatched unit with 3 bathrooms and 2
car garage.
7 Minutes
Floorplans)
14201 Cornelia Cir, Beaumont, CA
92223
981 SFD
1,564 - 3,266 s.f.

Plan 8
(2 -Story)
$564,990
2,520
$224.20
4 Single family detatched unit with 3 bathrooms and 2
car garage.

Plan 9
(2 -Story)
$618,250
2,730
$226.47
4 Single family detatched unit with 3 bathrooms and 3
car garage.

Plan 14
(2 -Story)
$512,990
2,114
$242.66
4 Single family detatched unit with 2.5 bathrooms and 2 car garage.
1/ Models are not currently available for sale as of June 2023; Pre -sales only.

Sources: LSCA; D.R. Horton, Richmond American, Woodside Homes, Meritage Homes, Taylor Morrison, Tri Pointe Homes leasing brochures.

Drive times to Downtown Core, Yum Yum Donuts, calculated by Google Maps with 12PM weekday arrival time.

EXHIBIT 4A -Beaumont New Home Sales
New Homes
0 Augusta at The Fairways by
D.R. Horton
0 Seasons at The Fairways by
Richmond American Homes
0 Big Canyon at Fairways by
Woodside Homes
0 RidgeView at the Fairways by
Woodside Homes
0 Merit age Homes at The
Fairways
0 Crown at Tournament Hills
Sales Office
0 Virtue at Tournament Hills by
Tri Pointe Homes
Olivewood by Taylor Morrison
0 0
J
0 GhQrrrVi y gr?d
•siockiide AA' 11
ChWtur.s. Dr
Cdk Y:iIX•r
Cheri ti'inrj 61.41
lieGdASJee Axe
tficr:y'Way flkd
Clem
;11F10
L.
..;14 GIrd
Brixlesir:r LV

EXHIBIT 5

STAKEHOLDER INTERVIEW LIST

NAME AND BUSINESS OR PROPERTY/CONTACT PHONE/EMAIL/INTERVIEW DATE A. RESTAURANTS/DINING OUTLETS AND BUSINESS OWNERS

1. JIMMY GARCIA; CRAFT LOUNGE, 690 Beaumont Avenue; (951) 536-7789. E- mail: [email protected]; 4/24/23.

2. VICTOR BARBOSA; TUSCANO'S PIZZA AND PASTA, 762 Beaumont Avenue; (909) 215-7351. E-mail: [email protected] ; 4/27/23.

3. ANTHONY COLINDRES; CORNERSTONE BBQ, 271 6th Street; (909) 991-4415.

E-mail: [email protected]; 4/26/23.

4. STEVEN LUNA; CAFE AGAPE, 381 E. 6th Street; (951) 572-2761. E-mail:
[email protected]; 4/11/23.

5. MARITZA, ADRIAN AND GIL VARGAS; RAMONA'S RESTAURANT, 249 W. 6TH Street; (619) 857-0048 (Adrian), (951) 269-1448 (Maritza); E-mail:
[email protected] ; [email protected],
[email protected]; 5/4/23.

6. JENNIFER BARNTHOUSE, PLANT MANAGER, PRECISION STAMPINGS SOLUTIONS, INC. DBA SMALL PARTS, INC. ("PSI"), AND NANCY BROWN, OFFICE CONTACT; 500 Egan Avenue; (951) 845-1174, Ext. 2501; E-mail:
[email protected] ; 7/12/23.

7. ERIC (HITENDRA) PATEL, SAHIL INVESTMENTS; Beaumont Unique Flowers & Gifts Building, 743 E. 6th Street and 6 -Unit 1929 -Built Motel Adjacent; (909) 553-9589. E-mail: [email protected]; 4/10/23.

8. JOHN DANIEL (ALSO JOHN VEKSER ON WEBSITE), RENESCENT, VEKSER; 514 N.

California Co -Working Building; (310) 505-0010; E-mail: johnvekser.corr.1 vekser.com; 4/10/23.

EXHIBIT 5

STAKEHOLDER INTERVIEW LIST

NAME AND BUSINESS OR PROPERTY/CONTACT PHONE/EMAIL/INTERVIEW DATE

9. JOHN -AARON LENHERT, BEAUMONT 878 LLC; Owner of property across from City Hall, 507 E. 6th Street (now demolished) at SEC of Magnolia and 6th Street, the Craft Lounge building (680-690 Beaumont Avenue), 804 E. 6th Street (tattoo parlor and nine attached residential units), 980 6th Street, and various other sites in Beaumont; (714) 454-9709. E-mail:
[email protected] ; 4/11/23.

10.TOM DANIELS; North of 8th Street, West of Beaumont, Vacant Parcels; (951) 316-7019; E-mail: [email protected]; 4/20/23 and in -person on 4/26/23.

11.AJ PATEL; CITY TREASURER, OWNER OF LAND UNDER HOTEL SALINA, AND ADJACENT LIQUOR STORE, AND IN ESCROW TO PURCHASE THE SITE AT N. 552 CALIFORNIA STREET; (562) 964-7341; E-mail: [email protected] ; 4/21/23.

12.DAVID KIKER; PROPERTY OWNER, AND OWNER OF AUTO REPAIR SERVICE (ACROSS STREET), MAPLE & 5TH STREET, 501 MAPLE AVENUE (505) 867-6222; E-mail: [email protected] ; 4/27/23.

13.ALLEN KOBLIN; COMMERCIAL DIRECTOR BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY; (818) 903- 9448; E-mail: [email protected]; 4/14 and 4/21/23.

14.ERIC RAMIREZ; COMMERCIAL BROKER, MILLENIA REAL ESTATE SERVICES; (909) 223-9540; E-mail: [email protected] ; 4/20/23.

EXHIBIT 6

MONTHLY RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY PERMITS
Month 2005
2006
2007
2008 1MI09
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014 2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Jan
46 179
130
23 32
15 10
5 17
38 13
19 31
41 74
19 0
72 30
Feb
62 145
94 8 13
77 4
12 30
44 18
13 33
3 14
12 0
80 13
Mar
215
112
106
12 35
68 8
6 43
37 25
39 62
23 55
17 31
96 Apr
280
183
114
41 51
17 15
30 39
32 57
24 64
136
63 3
37 97
May
232
203
146
27 34
17 7
33 36
61 56
56 104
82 46
4 61
139
Jun
361
176
129
46 47
31 36
36 119
121 109
7 325
136
53 49
60 44
Jul
127
173
52 47 24
45 17
20 22
2 10
37 0
37 45
17 56
14 Aug
81 131
45 18 31
19 32
38 48
16 21
37 10
11 42
10 48
25 Sep
368
13 19
14 25
14 0
28 53
29 29
30 16
67 15
11 83
48 Oct
211
29 47
39 23
0 5
5 34
14 42
52 46
62 25
8 18
26 Nov
186
56 30
7 10
12 9
32 48
10 50
13 13
45 39
27 10
31 Dec
186
52 116
11 30
6 28
29 12
33 20
54 37
41 60
87 0
118
Total 2,355
1,452
1,028
293 Elim
321
171
274
501
437 450
684
531
264
404
790
43 Five -Year Average
2018
684
2019
531
2020
264
2021
404
2022
790
Total Units
2,673
Avg Per Yr
535
Source: Daniel Diaz, Management Analyst, City of Beaumont.

EXHIBIT 7

BEAUMONT CURRENTLY AVAILABLE LISTED APARTMENTS
Name/Location/Units
Tuscany Villas
703 Allegheny St
Beaumont, CA 92223
40 Units, 2 Stories, 2008
2 Bed 2.5 Bath
Square footage (Sf)
Rent / Sf
$1,995
1,759
$1.13
3 Bed 2.5 Bath
Square footage (Sf)
Rent / Sf
$1,895
1,346
$1.41
3 Bed 2.5 Bath
Square footage (Sf)
Rent / Sf
$2,095
1,692
$1.24

PLANNED APARTMENT UNITS
Allegheny Apartments Allegheny St & 6th St
48 Units, 24 Units/Acre 24 Two -Bedroom, 24 Three -Bedroom Status: Under Review
Illinois Ave. Apartments 735 Illinois Ave & 8th St
21 One -Bedroom, 5 Two -Bedroom,
38 Units
12 Three -Bedroom
Status: Approved 6/2018
8th Street Apartments 1343 East 8th Street
48 Units, 38 Units/Acre 47 One -Bedroom, 1 Two -Bedroom Status: Plans recently prepared 2/2023
Xenia Apartments Xenia Avenue
192 Units, 17.5 Units/Acre 64 One -Bedroom, 128 Two -Bedroom Status: Planning Comission will review in 10/2023
Sources: LSCA; Apartmentguide.com; Apartments.com.

Page494of744

EXHIBIT 8

CITY OF BEAUMONT UPDATED DEMOGRAPHICS
United States -
Census
Bureau
QuickFacts
Beaumont city, California
QuickFacts provides statistics for all states and counties, and for cities and towns with a population oJ'5,000 or more.

Table
All Topics
Beaumont city,
California
Mean travel time to work (minutes), workers age 16 years+, 2017-2021 PEOPLE

35.1 Population
Population Estimates, July 1, 2022, (V2022)
Population estimates base, April 1, 2020, (V2022)
Population, percent change - April 1, 2020 (estimates base) to July 1, 2022, (V2022) Population, Census, April 1, 2020
Population, Census, April 1, 2010
Age and Sex
Persons under 5 years, percent
Persons under 18 years, percent
Persons 65 years and over, percent
Female persons, percent
Race and Hispanic Origin
White alone, percent
Black or African American alone, percent (a)
American Indian and Alaska Native alone, percent (a)
Asian alone, percent (a)
Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander alone, percent (a) Two or More Races, percent
Hispanic or Latino, percent (b)
White alone, not Hispanic or Latino, percent
Population Characteristics
Veterans, 2017-2021
Foreign born persons, percent, 2017-2021
Housing
Housing units, July 1, 2022, (V2022)
Owner -occupied housing unit rate, 2017-2021
© 56,349
8 53,045
6 6.2%
53,036
36,877
0 13.5%
0 51.2%
8 56.0%
8 8.7%
0 1.2%
& 8.2%

0.4%
0 11.8%
0 45.8%
0 34.2%
2,617

17.4%
X

79.5%
Median value of owner -occupied housing units, 2017-2021 $356,700 Median selected monthly owner costs -with a mortgage, 2017-2021 $2,233 Median selected monthly owner costs -without a mortgage, 2017-2021 $703 Median gross rent, 2017-2021 $1,376
Building permits, 2022 X
Families & Living Arrangements
Households, 2017-2021 15,610
Persons per household, 2017-2021 3.33
Living in same house 1 year ago, percent of persons age 1 year+, 2017-2021 89.1% Language other than English spoken at home, percent of persons age 5 years+, 2017-2021 32.6% Computer and Internet Use
Households with a computer, percent, 2017-2021
Households with a broadband Internet subscription, percent, 2017-2021 Education
High school graduate or higher, percent of persons age 25 years+, 2017-2021

98.3%

91.9%

88.7%
Bachelor's degree or higher, percent of persons age 25 years+, 2017-2021 26.5%

Total retail sales, 2017 ($1,000) (c)
Total retail sales per capita, 2017 (c)
Transportation
L
Health
With a disability, under age 65 years, percent, 2017-2021 7.0% Persons without health insurance, under age 65 years, percent 0 7.5% Economy
In civilian labor force, total, percent of population age 16 years+, 2017-2021 In civilian labor force, female, percent of population age 16 years+, 2017-2021 Total accommodation and food services sales, 2017 ($1,000) (c) Total health care and social assistance receipts/revenue, 2017 ($1,000) (c) Total transportation and warehousing receipts/revenue, 2017 ($1,000) (c)

62.5%

58.1%
60,723
55,475
7,844
494,731
$10,645
Mean travel time to work (minutes), workers age 16 years+, 2017-2021 Income & Poverty
Median household income (in 2021 dollars), 2017-2021
Per capita income in past 12 months (in 2021 dollars), 2017-2021 $92,797
$32,061
Persons m poverty, percent
0 8.8%
hi BUSINESSES
Businesses
Total employer establishments, 2021
Total employment, 2021
Total annual payroll, 2021 ($1,000)
Total employment, percent change, 2020-2021
Total nonemployer establishments, 2019
X
X
All employer firms, Reference year 2017
Men -owned employer firms, Reference year 2017
Women -owned employer firms, Reference year 2017
Minority -owned employer firms, Reference year 2017
Nonminority-owned employer firms, Reference year 2017
X
X
X
374
S
S
81 217
Veteran -owned employer firms, Reference year 2017
Nonveteran-owned employer firms, Reference year 2017
S
S

GEOGRAPHY
Geography
Population per square mile, 2020
Population per square mile, 2010
Land area in square miles, 2020
1,749.4
1,193.0

30.32 Land area in square miles, 2010
PIPS Code

30.91 0604758

EXHIBIT 9
Expenditure Potential & Supportable Retail Space for
Downtown Beaumont
Supportable Retail & Restaurant Space 2023
Beaumont Estimated Households Mid -Year 20231/
Assumed Median Household Income 21
Total Disposable Income (000)
17,610
$92,797
$1,393,970
SELECTED SHOPPER'S GOODS:

Expenditure Potential (000)
$136,005 -
$136,005
Estimated Optimum Capture Rates

5.0% -

6.5%
Annualized Sales Estimate (000)
$6,800 -
$8,840
RESTAURANTS/CAFES:

Expenditure Potential (000)
$70,698 -
$70,698
Estimated Optimum Capture Rates

15.0% -

20.0%
Annualized Sales Estimate (000)
$10,605 -
$14,140
CONVENIENCE GOODS -Small Grocery/Liquor
Expenditure Potential (000)
$182,354 -
$182,354
Estimated Optimum Capture Rates

4.0% -

5.0%
Annualized Sales Estimate (000)
$7,294 -
$9,118
TOTAL:

Expenditure Potential (000)
$389,057 -
$389,057
Estimated Optimum Capture Rates

6.3% -

8.3%
Total Sales Estimate (000)
$24,699 -
$32,098

TOTAL SUPPORTABLE SQUARE FOOTAGE
Supportable Sales Estimate:

Selected Shoppers Goods ($ 000)
$6,800 -
$8,840
Shoppers Goods Estimated Space
22,668 -
25,258
Minimum Supportable Sales per S.F.
$300 -
$350
Supportable Sales Estimate:

Restaurants/Cafes ($ 000)
$10,605 -
$14,140
Restaurant/Cafe Estimated Space Supported
26,512 -
31,421
Minimum Supportable Sales per S.F.
$400 -
$450
Supportable Sales Estimate:

Convenience Goods ($ 000)
$7,294 -
$9,118
Convenience Goods Estimated Space Supported
18,235 -
20,262
Achievable Sales per S.F.
$400 -
$450
Total Neighborhood Oriented Sales:
$24,699 -
$32,098
Subtotal S.F. (Without Services):
67,415 -
76,941
Add Personal Services, Recreation/
7,491 -
8,549
Services Space
-
Theoretical Retail S.F. Supportable
74,905 -
85,490
Source: U.S. Census population as of July 1, 2022 was 56,349. Divided by 3.3 persons per household, results in 17,075 households in 2022. Estimated new households of 535, based on Exhibit 6, the average annual number of new housing permits from 2018-2022, was added to 17,075 households to reach estimated figure of 17,610 in 2023. 21 Estimated median household income of households in 2021 dollars per U.S. Census. See Exhibit 8. County of Riverside year - over -year percent change in "covered average weekly wages" have been close to 0% from 2021 to 2022. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.

EXHIBIT 10
Expenditure Potential & Supportable Retail Space for
Downtown Beaumont
Supportable Retail & Restaurant Space 2028
Beaumont Estimated Households Mid -Year 2028 11
Assumed Median Household Income 21
Total Disposable Income (000)
20,110
$92,797
$1,591,860
SELECTED SHOPPER'S GOODS:

Expenditure Potential (000)
$155,313 -
$155,313
Estimated Optimum Capture Rates

5.0% -

6.5%
Annualized Sales Estimate (000)
$7,766 -
$10,095
RESTAURANTS/CAFES:

Expenditure Potential (000)
$80,734 -
$80,734
Estimated Optimum Capture Rates

15.0% -

20.0%
Annualized Sales Estimate (000)
$12,110 -
$16,147
CONVENIENCE GOODS -Small Grocery/Liquor
Expenditure Potential (000)
$208,241 -
$208,241
Estimated Optimum Capture Rates

4.0% -

5.0%
Annualized Sales Estimate (000)
$8,330 -
$10,412
TOTAL:

Expenditure Potential (000)
$444,288 -
$444,288
Estimated Optimum Capture Rates

6.3% -

8.3%
Total Sales Estimate (000)
$28,205 -
$36,654

TOTAL SUPPORTABLE SQUARE FOOTAGE
Supportable Sales Estimate:

Selected Shoppers Goods ($ 000)
$7,766 -
$10,095
Shoppers Goods Estimated Space
25,886 -
28,844
Minimum Supportable Sales per S.F.
$300 -
$350
Supportable Sales Estimate:

Restaurants/Cafes ($ 000)
$12,110 -
$16,147
Restaurant/Cafe Estimated Space Supported
30,275 -
35,882
Minimum Supportable Sales per S.F.
$400 -
$450
Supportable Sales Estimate:

Convenience Goods ($ 000)
$8,330 -
$10,412
Convenience Goods Estimated Space Supported
20,824 -
23,138
Achievable Sales per S.F.
$400 -
$450
Total Neighborhood Oriented Sales:
$28,205 -
$36,654
Subtotal S.F. (Without Services):
76,985 -
87,864
Add Personal Services, Recreation/
8,554 -
9,763
Services Space
-
Theoretical Retail S.F. Supportable
85,539 -
97,626
'i Source: U.S. Census population as of July 1, 2022 was 56,349. Divided by 3.3 persons per household, results in 17,075 households in 2022. Estimated new households of 535, based on Exhibit 6, the average annual number of new housing permits from 2018-2022, was added to 17,075 households to reach estimated figure of 17,610 in 2023. For 2028, we have assumed new homes (both single family and multi -family) sold are conservatively 500 a year over a 5 year period. Therefore, 2,500 new housing units are assumed to be added to the City of Beaumont in 5 years. 2/ Estimated median household income of households in 2021 dollars per U.S. Census. See Exhibit 8. County of Riverside year - over -year percent change in "covered average weekly wages" have been close to 0% from 2021 to 2022. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. All dollars expressed in today's dollars.

EXHIBIT 11
Expenditure Potential & Supportable Retail Space for
Downtown Beaumont
Supportable Retail & Restaurant Space 2033
Beaumont Estimated Households Mid -Year 2033 11
Assumed Median Household Income 21
Total Disposable Income (000)
22,610
$92,797
$1,789,750
SELECTED SHOPPER'S GOODS:

Expenditure Potential (000)
$174,621 -
$174,621
Estimated Optimum Capture Rates

5.0% -

6.5%
Annualized Sales Estimate (000)
$8,731 -
$11,350
RESTAURANTS/CAFES:

Expenditure Potential (000)
$90,771 -
$90,771
Estimated Optimum Capture Rates

15.0% -

20.0%
Annualized Sales Estimate (000)
$13,616 -
$18,154
CONVENIENCE GOODS -Small Grocery/Liquor
Expenditure Potential (000)
$234,128 -
$234,128
Estimated Optimum Capture Rates

4.0% -

5.0%
Annualized Sales Estimate (000)
$9,365 -
$11,706
TOTAL:

Expenditure Potential (000)
$499,520 -
$499,520
Estimated Optimum Capture Rates

6.3% -

8.3%
Total Sales Estimate (000)
$31,712 -
$41,211

TOTAL SUPPORTABLE SQUARE FOOTAGE
Supportable Sales Estimate:

Selected Shoppers Goods ($ 000)
$8,731 -
$11,350
Shoppers Goods Estimated Space
29,104 -
32,430
Minimum Supportable Sales per S.F.
$300 -
$350
Supportable Sales Estimate:

Restaurants/Cafes ($ 000)
$13,616 -
$18,154
Restaurant/Cafe Estimated Space Supported
34,039 -
40,343
Minimum Supportable Sales per S.F.
$400 -
$450
Supportable Sales Estimate:

Convenience Goods ($ 000)
$9,365 -
$11,706
Convenience Goods Estimated Space Supported
23,413 -
26,014
Achievable Sales per S.F.
$400 -
$450
Total Neighborhood Oriented Sales:
$31,712 -
$41,211
Subtotal S.F. (Without Services):
86,555 -
98,787
Add Personal Services, Recreation/
9,617 -
10,976
Services Space
-
Theoretical Retail S.F. Supportable
96,173 -
109,763
'1 Source: U.S. Census population as of July 1, 2022 was 56,349. Divided by 3.3 persons per household, results in 17,075 households in 2022. Estimated new households of 535, based on Exhibit 6, the average annual number of new housing permits from 2018-2022, was added to 17,075 households to reach estimated figure of 17,610 in 2023. For 2033, we have assumed new homes (both single family and multi -family) sold are conservatively 500 a year over a 10 year period. Therefore, 5,000 new housing units are assumed to be added to the City of Beaumont in 10 years. 2/ Estimated median household income of households in 2021 dollars per U.S. Census. See Exhibit 8. County of Riverside year - over -year percent change in "covered average weekly wages" have been close to 0% from 2021 to 2022. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. All dollars expressed in today's dollars.

EXHIBIT 12
Expenditure Potential & Supportable Retail Space for
Downtown Beaumont
Supportable Retail & Restaurant Space: At City Build -Out Per General Plan Beaumont Estimated Households at Build -Out 11
Assumed Median Household Income 21
Total Disposable Income (000)
31,021
$92,797
$2,455,493
SELECTED SHOPPER'S GOODS:

Expenditure Potential (000)
$239,575 -
$239,575
Estimated Optimum Capture Rates

5.0% -

6.5%
Annualized Sales Estimate (000)
$11,979 -
$15,572
RESTAURANTS/CAFES:

Expenditure Potential (000)
$124,535 -
$124,535
Estimated Optimum Capture Rates

15.0% -

20.0%
Annualized Sales Estimate (000)
$18,680 -
$24,907
CONVENIENCE GOODS -Boutique Grocery
Expenditure Potential (000)
$321,218 -
$321,218
Estimated Optimum Capture Rates

4.0% -

5.0%
Annualized Sales Estimate (000)
$12,849 -
$16,061
TOTAL:

Expenditure Potential (000)
$685,328 -
$685,328
Estimated Optimum Capture Rates

6.3% -

8.3%
Total Sales Estimate (000)
$43,508 -
$56,540

TOTAL SUPPORTABLE SQUARE FOOTAGE
Supportable Sales Estimate:

Selected Shoppers Goods ($ 000)
$11,979 -
$15,572
Shoppers Goods Estimated Space
39,929 -
44,493
Minimum Supportable Sales per S.F.
$300 -
$350
Supportable Sales Estimate:

Restaurants/Cafes ($ 000)
$18,680 -
$24,907
Restaurant/Cafe Estimated Space Supported
46,701 -
55,349
Minimum Supportable Sales per S.F.
$400 -
$450
Supportable Sales Estimate:

Convenience Goods ($ 000)
$12,849 -
$16,061
Convenience Goods Estimated Space Supported
32,122 -
35,691
Achievable Sales per S.F.
$400 -
$450
Total Neighborhood Oriented Sales:
$43,508 -
$56,540
Subtotal S.F. (Without Services):
118,752 -
135,532
Add Personal Services, Recreation/
13,195 -
15,059
Services Space
-
Theoretical Retail S.F. Supportable
131,946 -
150,591
11Source: For City build -out, we have used the total number of new residential units figure provided per City of Beaumont General Plan (includes 23,081 single-family units and 7,940 multi -family units. Therefore, 31,021 new housing units are assumed to be added to the City of Beaumont at build -out.
21 Estimated median household income of households in 2021 dollars per U.S. Census. See Exhibit 8. County of Riverside year - over -year percent change in "covered average weekly wages" have been close to 0% from 2021 to 2022. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. All dollars expressed in today's dollars.

EXHIBIT 13
Expenditure Potential & Supportable Retail Space for
Downtown Beaumont
Supportable Retail & Restaurant Space: Build -Out Sphere of Influence Sphere of Influence Estimated Households at Build -Out 1/ Assumed Median Household Income 21
Total Disposable Income (000)
9,828
$92,797
$777,944
SELECTED SHOPPER'S GOODS:

Expenditure Potential (000)
$75,902 -
$75,902
Estimated Optimum Capture Rates

2.5% -

3.0%
Annualized Sales Estimate (000)
$1,898 -
$2,277
RESTAURANTS/CAFES:

Expenditure Potential (000)
$39,455 -
$39,455
Estimated Optimum Capture Rates

10.0% -

15.0%
Annualized Sales Estimate (000)
$3,946 -
$5,918
CONVENIENCE GOODS -Boutique Grocery
Expenditure Potential (000)
$101,768 -
$101,768
Estimated Optimum Capture Rates

2.0% -

2.5%
Annualized Sales Estimate (000)
$2,035 -
$2,544
TOTAL:

Expenditure Potential (000)
$217,125 -
$217,125
Estimated Optimum Capture Rates

3.6% -

4.9%
Total Sales Estimate (000)
$7,878 -
$10,740

TOTAL SUPPORTABLE SQUARE FOOTAGE
Supportable Sales Estimate:

Selected Shoppers Goods ($ 000)
$1,898 -
$2,277
Shoppers Goods Estimated Space
6,325 -
6,506
Minimum Supportable Sales per S.F.
$300 -
$350
Supportable Sales Estimate:

Restaurants/Cafes ($ 000)
$3,946 -
$5,918
Restaurant/Cafe Estimated Space Supported
9,864 -
13,152
Minimum Supportable Sales per S.F.
$400 -
$450
Supportable Sales Estimate:

Convenience Goods ($ 000)
$2,035 -
$2,544
Convenience Goods Estimated Space Supported
5,088 -
5,654
Achievable Sales per S.F.
$400 -
$450
Total Neighborhood Oriented Sales:
$7,878 -
$10,740
Subtotal S.F. (Without Services):
21,277 -
25,311
Add Personal Services, Recreation/
2,364 -
2,812
Services Space
-
Theoretical Retail S.F. Supportable
23,641 -
28,124
'/ Source: Per City General Plan, Potential Development in the City and Sphere of Influence at build -out includes 40,849 residential units.

Subtracting out the City of Beaumont build -out figure of 31,021, results in additional household figure above. 2/ Estimated median household income of households in 2021 dollars per U.S. Census. See Exhibit 8. County of Riverside year -over -year percent change in "covered average weekly wages" have been close to 0% from 2021 to 2022. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. All dollars expressed in today's dollars.

EXHIBIT 14

COMPARISON OF PROJECTED DEMAND FOR AND SUPPLY OF DINING SPACE CITY OF BEAUMONT: 2023-2033 And Build -Out Per General Plan Current Year
Maximum Dining
Demand 2023
5 -Year Maximum
Dining Demand
2028
10 -Year
Maximum Dining
Demand 2033
City Build -Out
Maximum Dining
Demand
Sphere of
Influence Build-
Out Maximum
Dining Demand
City Build -Out
Dining Demand
Plus Sphere of
Influence
Additional Dining
Support From
Frwy 10 & Other
Regional Diners
(10%) 11
City Build -Out
Dining Demand
Plus Sphere of
Influence
Downtown Demand for Dining Space (Square Feet)
31,421
35,882
40,343
55,349
13,152
68,501
7,611
76,112
2023 Downtown Dining Space Supply (Square Feet)
Yelp Rated 4 and Above (See Exhibit 3B)
13,790
13,790
13,790
13,790
N/A
13,790
N/A
13,790
Additional Dining Space Supported (Square Fee )
Net New Dining Demand (Square Feet)
17,631 I
22,092
26,553 I
41,559
N/A I
54,711
7,611
I
62,322
Approximately 10% additional square footage of dining space is estimated to be supported from travelers along Freeway 10, as well as other regional residents living outside of Beaumont and its sphere of influence. This additional support is likely to happen after a critical mass of restaurants (12+ restaurants) has occurred. For conservative purposes, we have estimated that this additional support happens sometime after 10 years. 2/ Current average size of restaurants in Downtown Beaumont (Yelp 4+ Rating) is shown (See Exhibit 38). We estimate that future restaurant average size will be higher due to the void in the market of larger sized, higher quality restaurants.
3/ Square footages exclude outdoor dining space ranging from 500- 1,200 square feet.

Estimated
Number of
Restaurants at
Build -Out 2/
The Average
Restaurant Size 31
22 3,460
6 2,298
16 I 3,895

EXHIBIT 15

COMPARISON OF PROJECTED DEMAND FOR AND SUPPLY OF RETAIL SPACE CITY OF BEAUMONT: 2023-2033 And Build -Out Per General Plan Current Year
Maximum Retail
Demand 2023
5 -Year Maximum
Retail Demand
2028
10 -Year
Maximum Retail
Demand 2033
City Build -Out
Maximum Retail
Demand
Sphere of
Influence Build-
Out Maximum
Retail Demand
City Build -Out
Retail Demand
Plus Sphere of
11 Influence
Downtown Demand for Retail Space (Square Feet)
25,258
28,844
32,430
44,493
6,506
50,999
2023 Downtown Retail Space Supply (Square Feet)
Downtown Retail Supply Excluding Free -
Standing Businesses & Grocery/Liquor (See
Exhibit 1)
62,606
62,606
62,606
62,606
62,606
Additional Retail Space Supported (Square Feet)
Net New Retail Demand (Square Feet)
-37,348
-33,762
-30,176
-18,113
N/A
-11,607
1/ Although dining can support an additional 10% at build -out, retail square footage is conservatively not expected to be increased. The rationale for limiting the expansion of small shop retail space is that regional diners (from Freeway 10 & outside Beaumont and its sphere of influence) have limited time after dining in Downtown Beaumont.

EXHIBIT 16 - DOWNTOWN BEAUMONT NEAR -TERM OPPORTUNITY SITES -24.10
OQr�;
�1 J .o17.7itiLim61111i
Gt 1. I__..
�,A ,
INE
E 9th St
Ir _b t
IBC '►. —
EtthSt
!" 6th St
■ •..•.•••• ■ ■ ■ ■
•
• 2 Restaurants
• 12 Townhomes
■
■■■■■■■■■*q
•••••••••06
IN ■ ■ I
■ ■ .;1 ■ I ■ ■ ■ ■
■
7: 2 — 3 Additional Cafe
• Outdoor Dining Areas
Cafes
s

� t
•r-.._6 or. •

-„__... ,
in
lar
•
i1
-1' g Frt4
. • 4 - 6 Small Food / Bev
• Civic Center Plaza
• Compact Single Family
18 — 20 Homes
•
•
•

EXHIBIT 17 - DOWNTOWN BEAUMONT POTENTIAL STREET AND ALLEY IMPROVEMENTS a
7 u• •
• .. .M1
• 0.
. y..
•y k•:�
• . .4
r
• Gateway Rounds' blind
4 -- -Pedestrian
Emphasis
-
41r. rTur
} ,
Stewart Park improvements ; "' ' ", ' +�.•
�' f ir,
_ r•
Civic Center Closeable Market StreetAPP `:: • ``:
i ri Crnti;rkl'mpr ve n#s
h
Page .50.5.58`f 744
4::Lane
Str'eetsc;pe
Beautification
' '- Gateway !Roundabout
viar-
Center-Lane;Par ng.'.J*
ter StreLet,f4ajts
Alley for•Dining
&-Smali.Event Uses
•Pc'iiestriari
• .1. -.Ern ph.s,s
VW'
*ri
M▪ a- r
LMIs u!rada Rd

Strengths Weaknesses
• Affluent households moving into high quality new detached homes • Future family -oriented household growth expected to continue • Higher interest rates not likely to severely dampen home demand • Strong, growing family market drives demand for value priced, casual dining destinations
• Closest competitors are 15-30 min. away (e.g. Redlands, Yucaipa) • Long-term dining "void" demand to serve growing resident market • Easy accessibility from Freeway 10
SWOT
Opportunities Threats
• Several dining outlets interested in expanding long-term • City -owned Grace Bldg. is prime site for major restaurant • A new craft brewery tasting outlet would boost Downtown • Other renovation dining possibilities near Grace Building • Reuse of City -owned Civic Center Site for creative dining complex of 6-7 outlets could be a pivotal Downtown transformation • 8th & Beaumont St. site suitable for tree -shaded dining • Excellent build -out dining demand: 22 restaurants/cafes • Downtown should focus on independent entrepreneurs to distinguish from freeway -oriented competition

EXHIBIT 19

CIVIC CENTER SITE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

PROJECTED SALES (STATED IN TODAY'S DOLLARS)
LEASED
INDOOR

NUMBER DESCRIPTION SQUARE
FEET 1

OUTDOOR
DINING
SPACE

TARGET TARGET TOTAL TOTAL

MID -POINT

MINIMUM OPTIMUM MINIMUM OPTIMUM TARGET SALES

SALES/SF SALES/SF TARGET SALES TARGET SALES
FACING ORANGE AVENUE AND 6TH STREET
Single -Level Dining with High Ceilings
1 Independent Major Restaurant & Bar
5,000
1,200
400
650
2,000,000
3,250,000
2,625,000
2 Independent Major Restaurant
4,350
1,000
400
700
1,740,000
3,045,000
2,392,500
3 Independent Major Restaurant
4,250
1,000
400
725
1,700,000
3,081,250
2,390,625
4 Independent Casual Family -Oriented
3,850
800
400
550
1,540,000
2,117,500
1,828,750
5 Independent Casual Family -Oriented Cafe
3,650
800
400
600
1,460,000
2,190,000
1,825,000
6 Small Casual Quick Food Cafe
2,600
750
400
600
1,040,000
1,560,000
1,300,000
7 Coffee Outlet
1,000
500
400
600
400,000
600,000
500,000

TOTAL CIVIC CENTER SITE
24,700
6,050
400
641
9,880,000
15,843,750
12,861,875

APPENDIX B:

ENVIRONMEN

GENERAL PLAN

PROGRAM

ENVIRONMENTAL

IMPACT REPORT

REVIEW MEMO
A key strategy for facilitating
Downtown Revitalization is
ensuring the Programmatic
Environmental Report connected
to the General Plan and its
Downtown Area Plan also reflects
proposals in the more detailed
Revitalization Plan. The goal will
be a strategic Downtown action
plan that can tier off existing
CEQA documentation.

OVERVIEW OF RECOMMENDATIONS
The Downtown Beaumont Revitalization Plan (DBRP)
is essentially an implementation plan that provides
additional detail regarding downtown area development
contemplated by the City's 2020 General Plan.

However, the DBRP would be adopted by the City as a
discretionary action and would require some form of
CEQA documentation. We recommend this be in the
form of a CEQA Addendum to the 2020 General Plan EIR,
consistent with Section 15164 of the CEQA Guidelines.

��-r�.�.�.,� c ,_
„MN Ord �, - ITM
�
—_.- ‘.
• 1..a....4[..,....
- --.
▪ E..w4N•FERN Ow.
• ••
• .}••... 1

320 Goddard, #200
Irvine, CA 92618
USA
https://www.ghd.com/en-us
Our ref: 12592877
28 March 2024
City of Beaumont
550 E. 6th Street
Beaumont, CA 92223
Downtown Beaumont Revitalization Plan — General Plan PEIR Review Dear Ms. Kendrick and Ms. Taylor:

GHD is pleased to share this Existing Site Conditions Memo with the City of Beaumont (City) to summarize the adequacy and sufficiency of the existing 2020 General Plan (General Plan) and Program -level Environmental Impact Report (PEIR) to address potential environmental impacts associated with implementation of the Downtown Beaumont Revitalization Plan (DBRP). Our review includes evaluating potential future development in downtown Beaumont and guidance on how to appropriately review future projects under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) process.

Overview of Development Under the 2020 General Plan and PEIR The 2020 General Plan and PEIR provides a detailed overview of goals, policies, and implementation measures for the City of Beaumont to support future growth. The overarching elements of the PEIR and General Plan consist of the following:
• Land Use + Community Design Element
• Mobility Element
• Economic Development and Fiscal Element
• Health + Environmental Element
• Community Facilities + Infrastructure Element
• Conservation + Open Space Element
• Safety Element
• Noise Element
To facilitate future development in the City, several of the Elements referenced above include land use designations, preservation of existing and development of new neighborhoods with varied housing opportunities, as well as new commercial and mixed -use areas. Specifically, the Land Use Element of the General Plan focuses on goals and policies for neighborhoods and commercial areas. The General Plan aims to improve the City's infrastructure for the benefit of the community while maintaining diverse and extensive open space networks to maintain natural views as well as promote recreation.

Development goals outlined by the City also include emphasis on future development within the City boundaries, specifically the downtown area. The 2020 General Plan includes a Downtown Area Plan (DAP) intended to articulate a vision for downtown, as the City lacks a defined and recognizable downtown area and has great potential for downtown development. The DAP provides development regulations and design 4 The Power of Commitment
GHD Inc.

guidance for the expansion and growth of Downtown Beaumont's three subareas: Sixth Street Corridor, Sixth Street Corridor Extended, and Beaumont Avenue (Figure 1). `.

J I ll H i I i l�
au
p
i
w
y
_.E
_,_
Na
if".Ii
`C
`l l
o
`F I
Inlj
STPCE
�i
ky
+1IIuldl
—
j
�r .
=
X11#41H�
f —=

12 •
_n
Ilk[
�� +4A!
MMEE
Fes-
at' 041111111
41111 I:
o sraeeT
._t
0 'e
-
NI 11:11111'
sTAF
lab
w
kil J
yiL mL a l ALIA ///_ i% i'��
r
I-10 FREEWAY
I
1 •
Mlles
0 0.075 0.15 9.3 0.45 9.6 j
_ : City Boundary Downtown Mixed Residential — Sixth Street Mixed Use - Public Facilities - Downtown Residential Residential
=Beaumont Ayenue District Multifamily Local Commercial VV Active Ground Uses Required _ Downtown District Downtown Mixed Use Downtown Area Plan Land Use = Extended Sixth Street District Beaumont Mixed Use
City of Beaumont General Plan Update
Downtown Residential single = Sixth Street Mixed Use
Family
.4 1. 14 L NI A.

WEBB
0 Figure 1: Downtown Beaumont Area Boundaries and Land Use Plans Source: Draft PEIR Beaumont General Plan, 2020
Furthermore, City of Beaumont encourages future development to protect views of natural areas in and to the south and west of the City, as well as to incorporate public plazas with seating, public gathering places, and drinking fountains, especially in prominent locations and areas of pedestrian activity. One of the top goals of the 2020 General Plan is to create a vibrant downtown to reduce vacancies and promote mixed use development with ample housing and retail opportunities to invite economic growth. This will be achieved by a human -scale design that includes improved pedestrian experiences (e.g., wide sidewalks), multi -modal streets, and walkable communities.

The DAP lays the groundwork for what the City envisions for the Downtown Core, which is intended to be the "cultural, civic, entertainment, and social heart of the community," and will consist of mixed -use development and prioritize capital spending. The Downtown Core district extends from Egan Avenue on the west to Palm Avenue on the east and is bordered by 8th Street on the north and Interstate 10 (1-10) on the south. The Downtown Core's close proximity to the 1-10 corridor will help draw visitors to the City's new downtown. Furthermore, the DAP identifies quantitative thresholds for development and guidance for land use designations, zoning districts, and residential intensity/density for the DAP districts (Table 1). The DAP promotes densification of downtown and includes guidance on the number of dwelling units per acre (du/ac), which range from 4 du/ac to 22 du/ac, floor area ratios for development square footage, and standards on building heights for a given downtown land use designation. 12592877 1 Downtown Beaumont Revitalization Plan — Existing Conditions Summary Memo 2

Table 1: Proposed Zoning Districts for Downtown Area Plan Land Use Zoning
Designation District Description Density / Intensity
Abbreviations used in this table: du/acre = dwelling units per acre; FAR = floor area ratio; N/A = not applicable Downtown Core
Downtown Mixed
Use
DTMU*
(Downtown
Mixed Use)
This designation supports a lively, thriving Downtown area by accommodating up to 3 story, mixed- use buildings. Active and retail uses are required along the 6th Street and Beaumont Avenue Street frontages to create a pedestrian -oriented and vibrant environment. This designation provides for vertical and horizontal mixed -use development.
• Maximum 15 du/ac
• Maximum FAR 0.35
• Maximum building height
up to 3 stories
Downtown Mixed
Residential
R -SF and
R -TN*
This designation corresponds to existing areas with a mix of single and multifamily residential uses. The corresponding zoning districts will reflect current densities.
• Maximum 15 du/ac
• Maximum FAR N/A
• Maximum building height
up to 2 stories
Public Facilities
P -F
This designation includes the Civic Center, Police Department, Stewart Park, Palm Innovation Academy.
• Maximum FAR up to 1.0
Extended Sixth Street
Sixth Street
Mixed Use
SSMU*
This designation provides for commercial uses and multifamily housing along the 6th Street Corridor east of Palm Avenue and has the highest densities in the Downtown, with nodes of commercial at key intersections. Stand-alone commercial or multifamily uses are permitted. The multifamily housing is supportive of the retail and commercial uses in downtown and is near the future transit station south on Pennsylvania. The typical development is larger than those envisioned in the DMU or BMU designations.
• Maximum 22 du/ac
• Maximum FAR 0.5
• Maximum building height
up to 4 stories
Sixth Street
Mixed Use
Residential)
SSMU-R*
This district provides for multifamily housing and commercial uses along the north side of the 6th Street Corridor, east of Palm Avenue and allows higher densities, with nodes of commercial at key intersections. Multifamily uses are required. The multifamily housing is supportive of the retail and commercial uses in downtown and is near the future transit station south of Pennsylvania. Live/work units are permitted and encouraged. The typical development is larger than those envisioned in the DMU or BMU designations.
• Maximum 22 du/ac
• Maximum FAR 0.5
• Maximum building height
up to 4 stories
Downtown
Residential
Multifamily
DMF*
This designation creates walkable, transit ready residential neighborhoods located near concentrated commercial, civic and recreational uses. Housing in these neighborhoods is primarily multifamily in a variety of housing types, such as townhomes, walkups, garden apartments and condominiums.
• Maximum 22 du/ac
• Maximum FAR 0.5
. Maximum building height
up to 4 stories
Downtown
Residential
Single Family
R -SF
The Residential Single -Family zone corresponds to existing residential development within the Downtown Area Plan
consisting of single-family detached units.
• Maximum 4 du/ac
• Maximum FAR N/A
• Maximum building height
up to 2 stories
Local
Commercial
LC*
The Local Commercial designation covers smaller commercial, retail and service -related activities found along Highland Springs Avenue (at the eastern end of the Sixth Street Corridor). This land use designation permits a range of neighborhood supportive retail and service oriented land uses.
• Maximum FAR 0.7
• Maximum building height
up to 4 stories
Public Facilities
P -F
This designation includes the Civic Center, Police Department, Stewart Park, Palm Innovation Academy.
• Maximum FAR up to 1.0
Beaumont Avenue
Beaumont Mixed
Use
BMU*
The intent of the properties along the segment of Beaumont Avenue, located between 8th Street (on the south) and 13th Street (on the north) is to facilitate the corridor's transition to a mixed- use district containing professional office, service, and limited commercial activities alongside residential uses. Future nonresidential development shall be compatible with neighboring residential development
• Maximum 10 du/ac
• Maximum FAR 0.35
. Maximum building height
up to 2 stories
Beaumont
Residential
Single Family
R -SF
The Residential Single -Family zone corresponds to existing residential development within the Downtown Area Plan
consisting of single-family detached units.
• Maximum 4 du/ac
• Maximum FAR N/A
• Maximum building height
up to 2 stories
12592877 1 Downtown Beaumont Revitalization Plan — Existing Conditions Summary Memo 3

Additionally, the 2020 General Plan explains that new development shall effectively protect sensitive habitats and natural communities, minimize new impervious surface development, reduce light pollution, and emphasize native landscaping. It is also recommended that new development in the City incorporate recycled water infrastructure and renewable energy where feasible. The City of Beaumont's plan for future expansion and revitalization of the downtown area are intended to benefit the local community, elevate the quality of life for residents, and promote economic growth in the region.

New Development Concepts of the DBRP
The proposed development concepts in the DBRP comprise design capacity studies for select areas of the City, which offer the highest redevelopment opportunity for landowners and the downtown community.

These concepts are centered around incremental and investable City improvements to promote economically viable development. The DBRP development scenarios include mixed use, residential, and commercial development, as well as proposed street and parking configurations. Proposed improvements also consist of zoning recommendations, conceptual streetscapes, site plans for redevelopment, architectural guidelines, transportation solutions, increased pedestrian spaces, bicycle -friendly spaces, and upgraded public infrastructure/civic center. Redevelopment in downtown Beaumont is proposed for select opportunity sites and development of select neighborhoods is based on highest and best use of land (Figure 2).

Figure 2: Proposed Land Use Designations for Development Opportunity Sites in Downtown Beaumont.

Source: GHD, 2024
Mixed Use Development
Small 'Starter Home" Residential
Civic Center + Community Facility
Shared Off -Street Parking Facility
Below is an example development scenario for a neighborhood in downtown Beaumont (Figure 3). 12592877 1 Downtown Beaumont Revitalization Plan — Existing Conditions Summary Memo 4

City Accelerated Developments 1 The Arbor Hub at Beaumont & 8th Euclid Ave
ti

1.4K

1.4K

1.4K

1.4K
E 8th St
i
25 Spaces
Private Patio
Dining
5K
Beaumont Ave
Neighborhood Adjacent to a
Unique Dining Garden
Residential
Dwelling Units
NSF per Unit
Food + Bev
Service
Parking (Onsite)
Parking (Offsite)
Parking Demand
16,200 GSF
12 DU
1,400 DU
5,000 GSF
0 GSF
25 Sp
0 Sp
25 Sp 10 Sp
Total GSF
FAR (Housing)
DU/Ac (Housing)
21,200 GSF

0.56 18.14
Figure 3: Potential Development Scenario for The Arbor Hub at Beaumont & 8th Street Neighborhood.

Source. GHD, 2024
This development scenario illustrates a mix -use approach including residential dwelling units, restaurant space, and parking and focuses on densifying the area. Densifying the area will promote connectivity and incorporate multiple land uses in a concentrated area to benefit the community.

Beaumont downtown streetscape improvements include Beaumont Avenue from Fifth Street to Eleventh Street and Sixth Street from Veile Avenue to Pennsylvania Avenue. Improvements encourage complete streets, safety for all modes, and right -sizing parking needs. These proposed improvements are based on the DAP roadway designs, and any slight differences are a result of analysis informing decisions on safety and parking needs, while aligning with the General Plan and DAP.

The proposed transportation improvements are not expected to conflict with any program, plan, ordinance, or policy, and will be consistent with the General Plan, DAP, and PEIR. Specifically, the General Plan identifies Beaumont Avenue and Sixth Street in the downtown area as part of the Pedestrian and Bicycle Priority Network, and these recommendations will contribute to the network though bump -out intersections for pedestrian safety, widened sidewalk space, and travel speeds suitable for pedestrians. Transportation recommendations of the DBRP align with the DAP's Guiding Principle to create a vibrant downtown though multi -modal street design, and with the Circulation Policies.

Roadway reconfiguration designs of the DBRP were based on the DAP designs, and any slight differences in cross sections continue to largely align with DAP principles and policies and the General Plan's vision to implement complete streets. Beaumont Avenue from Fifth Street to Sixth Street will be reduced from four lanes to two lanes with a landscape median and the addition of a bike lane. Similarly, Beaumont Avenue from Sixth Street to Eighth Street will be reduced from four lanes to two lanes with the addition of parallel parking and bike lanes. While recommendations introduce on -street parking to accommodate the deficit in downtown, the solutions align with the DAP:

Policy 11.8.12
Ensure an adequate supply of parking in the Downtown Core district without compromising the vision for a walkable downtown.

Recommended parking management strategies of the DBRP align with those listed in the DAP, including park once and connect to pedestrian and bicycle facilities, permitted parking for employees, shared parking of 6th Street Civic Center with Water District, and Sixth Street fee -in -lieu parking fees.

Potential Environmental Impacts of the DBRP
Implementation of the DRBP will provide community -wide benefits to residents and visitors of the City. As such, the City's proposed new development goals may result in a change to the existing community 12592877 1 Downtown Beaumont Revitalization Plan — Existing Conditions Summary Memo 5

dynamic as well as impacts to the environment. Outlined below are a list of environmental disciplines that may be affected by the DRBP:
• Aesthetics: Redevelopment would result in changes to the community look and feel of the City's downtown area. Development goals include densification of downtown and introduction of mixed - use development, which would result in building up and out from the current downtown footprint. • Air Quality/ Greenhouse Gas Emissions: The DRBP includes expanding parking opportunities in the downtown, which could result in increased vehicle traffic and emissions. • Geology/Soils and Hydrology/Water Quality: Development would result in more ground disturbing activities. Geotechnical or hydrologic studies may be needed depending on the scope and size of a given downtown revitalization project.
• Noise: Increased numbers of restaurants, housing units, vehicles, and people in the downtown would result in greater noise levels. Daytime and nighttime noise ordinances may need to be adjusted to accommodate the increased activity. Noise could also have impacts on nearby wildlife or sensitive receptors.
• Population and Housing: Mixed -use zoning and emphasis on expanding downtown could result in an increased need for housing.
• Recreation: Increased development and visitors downtown could generate a need for recreational facilities and open space.
• Transportation: Increased demand for parking downtown to accommodate more housing, retail, and restaurants would present new challenges for traffic and congestion. There may be a need to adjust street and parking configurations or to introduce more roundabouts to offset potential transportation impacts. Additional parking management recommendations include on -street parking and park one options.
• Utilities and Service Systems: As downtown expands and densifies, there would be an increased need for utility service, maintenance, and capacity to serve the population.

With regards to transportation, Vehicle Miles Travelled (VMT) is anticipated to be reduced through strategic design decisions. The following items align with the OPR SB 743 Technical Advisory and the Caltrans Transportation Analysis under CEQA (TAC) guidance documents and these recommendations are not expected to result in an increase in VMT:
• A reduction in number of through lanes on Beaumont Avenue and Sixth Street. • Installation of two roundabouts along 6th Street.
• Addition of new bike and pedestrian facilities on Beaumont Avenue and Sixth Street. • Adoption of on -street parking along Beaumont Avenue. • Installation of traffic calming devices, including road closures on Sixth Street. • Roadway shoulder enhancements to provide "breakdown space," dedicated space for use only by transit vehicles, to provide bicycle access, or to otherwise improve safety, but which will not be used as automobile vehicle travel lanes; in this project, curb extensions for pedestrian safety. • Safety projects designed to improve bicycle and pedestrian facilities, including high visibility crosswalks, curb extensions, curb ramps, pedestrian refuge island, bike conflict zone markings.

Furthermore, transportation design improvements are anticipated to increase safety along the downtown streets, including widened sidewalks, buffered bicycle lanes, curb extensions, bike conflict zone markings, addition of two roundabouts along Sixth Street, urban cooling through tree -shaded streets, and traffic calming devices. The project designs will comply with all industry standards to ensure safety at intersections for all modes and will not impede emergency access.

CEQA Recommendations
The CEQA checklist, also known as the initial study checklist or CEQA Guidelines Appendix G, is shown below. This checklist is a planning tool that is intended to aid public agencies in determining the level of 12592877 1 Downtown Beaumont Revitalization Plan — Existing Conditions Summary Memo 6

environmental impact of a project. The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by the DBRP, with at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact".

Table 1: CEQA Initial Study Checklist — Environmental Impacts Associated with the DBRP 0 Aesthetics
0 Greenhouse Gas Emissions
❑ Public Services
❑ Agricultural & Forestry
Resources
❑ Hazards & Hazardous Materials
1 Recreation
Air Quality
/1 Hydrology & Water Quality
Transportation
❑ Energy
❑ Land Use & Planning
❑ Tribal Cultural Resources
❑ Biological Resources
❑ Mineral Resources
1 Utilities & Service Systems
❑ Cultural Resources
❑ Wildfire
/1 Noise
❑ Mandatory Findings of
Significance
0 Geology & Soils
0 Population & Housing
Upon review of the CEQA checklist, there are several areas where future development has the potential to result in impacts to the community and environment. However, development will take place in areas of downtown that are previously disturbed and potential environmental impacts associated with the DRBP are sufficiently covered by the PEIR. The PEIR adequately discusses new and proposed development and the PEIR DAP aligns with the goals and objectives of the DRBP. As such, future development in the City's downtown would likely be able to tier off the PEIR (see definition in CEQA Guidelines Section 15385).

Depending upon the scope and scale, future proposed development could either:
• Rely entirely upon the analysis in the General Plan EIR as sufficient; • Prepare a Categorical Exemption (where applicable under CEQA Section 15300); or • Prepare a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND; for projects with potentially significant environmental impacts that can be mitigated).

Categorical exemptions are identified by the State Resources Agency for groups or classes of projects as defined in the CEQA Guidelines (Sections 15300-15333) that have been determined not to have a significant effect on the environment and are therefore exempt from the provisions of CEQA. Examples of CEQA exemptions that may apply to the new development in the City may include Class 2 projects (Section 15302: Replacement or Reconstruction), Class 3 projects (Section 15303: New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures), and/or Class 32 projects (Section 15332: In -Fill Development Projects). For example, the Class 32 exemption may apply to projects for infill housing of less than 5 acres within City limits surrounded by urban land uses.

The DBRP is essentially an implementation plan that provides additional detail regarding downtown area development contemplated by the City's 2020 General Plan. However, the DBRP would be adopted by the City as a discretionary action and would require some form of CEQA documentation. We recommend this be in the form of a CEQA Addendum to the 2020 General Plan EIR, consistent with Section 15164 of the CEQA Guidelines.

In summary, the proposed development scenarios of the DBRP, including transportation recommendations, align well with the goals and objectives of the General Plan, DAP, and PEIR. These documents will aid in the CEQA review process and will help guide future development in the City, subject to additional review as described above.
12592877 1 Downtown Beaumont Revitalization Plan — Existing Conditions Summary Memo 7

Regards,
Charles Smith, AICP, LEED AP
Business Group Leader, Impact Assessment
949-585-5257
[email protected]
Copy to: GHD project team as needed
Nicole Greenberg
Senior Environmental Planner
949-585-5213
[email protected]
12592877 I Downtown Beaumont Revitalization Plan — Existing Conditions Summary Memo 8

— •
•
I- ' • • Q _ ' �'-
i<- . - •
• • 3
4 F R.
•
•r3
th
• H
- a
•
+� ti
5i
-N;" � 4 •
- •
•
PART

DOWNTOWN CODE
y.

1/44 I
• F (1)
II
116 •
44 ce
•
ric 11

0. D CC
1 1C1
0 CI
I �
•

11.1 ' S I�1'
de r
•
ir
`1' l 1
Pi
•
t Ie ap t= •'i. r �,{• -
41;
•
I
4 J
•

DC -1 DOWNTOWN

ARCHITECTURE

GUIDELINES

DC -1.1 ARCHITECTURAL

GUIDELINES PURPOSE
These Guidelines aim to enrich
the development of Downtown
Beaumont by focusing on the
key components of architectural
design that contribute to a
visually engaging, legible, and
more consistent public realm that
expresses the history of the City's
oldest neighborhoods.

Responding to context, whether it be the streets and
paseos, buildings, or activities is key to achieving good design outcomes. Each of these sections is designed to
assist the City in reviewing architectural proposals from a functional and historic prespective, not merely from a stylstic or aesthetic perspective, as they pertain to each of several styles relevant to Beaumont's story.

By providing a series of intent statements, objective
outcomes, and style guide for architectural design within Beaumont's Downtown area, these guidelines can be
applied flexibly and adaptively to help City staff guide collaboratively with developers based on an intented
quality of place.

These guidelines will support safe and comfortable
environments for all users, help establish a sense of
place and quality, and will provide detailed information about architectural elements, building massing, material choices, and more.

HOW TO READ THESE GUIDELINES
The Guidelines use illustrations and photos to visually communicate the desired design results. The intent of the graphic format of this document is to make the information clear and accessible to a diverse audience, including the community, designers, planners, and developers.

Diagrams are provided for illustrative purposes, the
architecture design guidelines aim to accommodate a
variety of styles that are compatible with the existing local architectural fabric of Beaumont.

Development projects are generally required to comply with objective outcomes; however, applicants may choose to
forgo one or more objective outcomes and instead meet the spirit of the relevant intent statements.

The Guidelines are broken up into sections:

1. 1. Approach, Applicability & Context provides an
overarching mission and implementation approach to
these Guidelines, and unpacks Downtown's historical
development as context for today's Guidelines.

2. 2. Downtown Styles introduces and details the four
recommended styles for this document that are intrinsic to past and future development for the downtown area.

3. Massing & Form Articulation lends an understanding
of main massing and roofline

4. Corners at Streetfront addresses special guidelines for active facade corners on 6th St. and Beaumont Ave.

5. Awnings & Shades describes important methods of
outdoor space shading with canopies and trellises

100

DC -1 .2 ARCHITECTURAL

APPROACH & APPLICABILITY
This guide looks at the architectural
and historic context of Downtown
Beaumont, and outlines how we
can use values, principles and
approaches - based on good
design - to addresses matters of
climate, comfort, streetscape, and
human interaction which are specific
to the City. Taken together, these
elements make up the constituent
parts a highly desireable Downtown
for business and lifestyle.

DC -1.2.1 DOWNTOWN

GUIDELINE MISSION
Downtown Beaumont is among the earliest areas to develop in the San Gorgonio Pass. Many historic buildings that serve today gathering places, business settings, and places of worship, are also the original anchors of the district at the heart of the community. Promoting the cultural and structural significance of Downtown through Architectural Guidelines that extend from and reflect on this architectural heritage will ensure future residents and visitors enjoy the same longstanding quality of living Beaumont has always offered.

The City of Beaumont has recently updated its zoning and related development standards. Typically, an architectural guideline serves more subjective approval determinations, where standards offer applicants greater certainty for a more expedient process. Therefore, this guideline supplements and supports the Objective Design Standards and addresses issues not covered by it.

The City Planning department should:
1). Work collaboratively to promote the intent of this
guideline, and without unduly upholding the approval process to achieve one solution where alternatives viably deliver that intent. The City should establish a permit process period goals to promote streamlining that encourages downtown
development.

2.) Provide staff or contract with vendors who have
professional experience in architecture and urban design to support applicants and understand their needs in the review process.

3.) Seek a cohesive, healthy, resilient, and creative Downtown urban environment that is walkable, comfortable, and a
regional visitor and resident touchstone historic district.

DC -1.2.2 DOWNTOWN

GUIDELINE APPROACH
This Architectural Guideline is developed according to four broad style categories which can be observed through the historic development of Downtown Beaumont. Each is
described according to its historic background, its place in a regional narrative, and the intent fulfilled by bringing a project in each style to Downtown. This is followed by a description of the value of style elements to environmental and experiential factors for residents and visitors - lending rationale to the application of each architectural mode.

Lastly, the style is unpacked according to key elements, materials, and colors which must be found in the approved development concept.

Above: contemporary applications of traditional architecture. The City should interpret the intent of Guideline recommendations in a manner which may allow contemporary applications of historic styles and architectural details - as shown in the examples above. Overall, authenticity of materials, build quality, and level of detail are most important.
101 DOWNTOWN BEAUMONT REVITALIZATION PLAN
Page522of744

DC -1.3 ARCHITECTURAL

CONTEXT
This Guideline will ensure that
Downtown Beaumont retains a direct
line to a meaningful story of small
town origins while preparing for
the future as a distinctive, historic,
economically and climatically
resilient, high quality Downtown.

Downtown Beaumont is the "old town" for the City of
Beaumont, and among its earliest notable developments and community anchors were the Queen Anne Victorian McCoy
house (1885), the Hotel Edinburgh (1887), the Beaumont rail depot (1888), Beaumont City Hall (1913), Beaumont Library (a Carnegie Library, 1914). Residential and commercial
development of Downtown Beaumont was continuous
from the turn of the 20th century through the 1950s, and expressed a comprehensive range of architectural styles.

Spanish revival and Mission style were already present in key structures, such as City Hall, and the Triangle Gas Station, the City's first, which still stands at Grace Ave. as the shuttered Beaumont Cleaners. Later examples existed as roadside
hotels and in residential tracts, especially as the bungalow court type.

Craftsman architecture was prominent in early 20th century Downtown Beaumont residential work. Several of these are still found north of E. 6th Street today. The C. B. Eyer house was an early example on E 6th Street near City Hall and recently demolished.

National style, a common late 19th and early 20th century mode of pragmatic architecture, was present in the
Beaumont Depot, as well as the later Beaumont Women's
Club, built in 1909. Many homes, large and small, throughout Downtown, reflect this simple approach to architecture.

Art Moderne and similar Mid -Century Modern architecture of early and mid -20th century roadside commercial
development became the defining face of Beaumont to
travelers along former US -99 / US 60/70, or 6th St. today.

Many examples still line this main community corridor
today, including the former Beaumont Theater (currently the Beaumont Antique Mall, 1940).

Outside of Downtown, modern development of the 1980s
through 2020s primarily carries a Spanish or Mission
architecture - at minimum with application of terra-cotta tyle and beige stucco finish. Ideally, through greater control of architecutre, Downtown will stand as a distinctive district in the architectural context of greater Beaumont.

Page523of744
102

DC -1.4 NATIONAL

FOLK STYLE
A pragmatic and minimally
elaborated American 19th and 20th
century architecture, and bearing
some qualities in common with
Frontier Style; National Folk is a
broad category encompassing
simple residential structures and
some commercial shopfronts.

The National Folk Style, or National Style is a broad catch- all category for several related styles of common American architecture. The grouping of sub -styles under the label "National Style" is commonly divided into pre- and post - railroad eras. The post -railroad era is more common in the Western US, and is found in many Downtown Beaumont
structures. The style was most prevalent from 1850 to
1900 and best describes the design of Beaumont's Summit rail depot, constructed in the 1880s. Today, the style is a standard for pragmatic and efficient architecture with minimal adornment/elaboration while offering a quality suitable for the heart of Beaumont.

Many examples of National Folk Style are recognized by a gable -front pediment, often covering a front stoop or front porch. This can be observed in the Women's Club building in Downtown along E. 6th Street. Other examples are
residential properties, the largest of which still stands at 545 Euclid Ave, which emphasizes Greek revival details. While exhibiting a purer Greek revival style, Beaumont's current City Hall at 550 E. 6th St bears a relationship to the National Style with a front pediment and window proportions.

Frontier architecture describes a subcategory of this style that emphasizes entry porches, column supported gable -covered balconies. This type of structure also emphasizes timber post and beam framing, especially for exterior facade balconies, roof extensions, and smaller shade elements. Knee bracing is a common element in these structures.

Finish materials in the National Style are similar to Craftsman architecture, commonly emphasizing wood/clapboard, but
may include vertical wood siding types, shingles, brick, and even stucco finishes where relief elements take the place of wood trim. Two story structures, especially mixed use and large commercial projects are encouraged to employ dormers, and broken rooflines covering extensive porches to both add - visual interest and offer opportunities for activity and visual connection at the building street frontage.

DC -1.4.1 WHEN BEST TO USE

A NATIONAL FOLK STYLE
The National style is best suited for residential projects and very small retail development. Developers seeking to employ this style of architecture along 6th St or Beaumont Ave should employ gable -covered porches to address the need for an active street frontage. Clerestory or dormer windows should be required for side -gabled structures that present a large roof surface toward the street frontage - especially for 2 -story structures. A Frontier style approach is highly preferable for mixed -use development applications which commonly
replaces a gable -covered porch with a balcony useful to upper story occupants.

National Folk style is an acceptable alternative to Craftsman architecture for residential projects that undergo significant value engineering. Where the City may desire more
elaboration to represent a truly Craftsman structure and a project applicant needs to significantly reduce cost, the City should discuss the National style as a suitable approach with similar aesthetic and structural qualities.
•
tvAL!ILII II I
11 2 -level hotel, Bridgeport, CA
2 -level mixed use with hotel, Healdsburg, CA
103 DOWNTOWN BEAUMONT REVITALIZATION PLAN
Page524of744

DC -1.4.2 NATIONAL FOLK ELEMENTS

1. Moderate slope gable roof (typ. 4:12 to 12:12), may be hipped, pyramidal, bonnet, lean-to, or broken -gable

2. Gable-front/pediment, or, extended side -gable eaves, or lean-to, typ. to cover front porch or balcony; centered or wrap -around.

3. Vertically oriented hung windows, matched width, may be clustered in 2 or 3, regularly spaced, simple wood or similar appearance box frame - typ. unelaborated.

4. Wood siding preferred, typ. clapboard or vertical types, also shake/shingle, limited brick or stucco.

FIGURE DC -1.4.A: NATIONAL FOLK ELEMENTS EXAMPLE

5. Simple timber supports for eaves and roof
extensions; often unelaborated knee bracing
(straight or cuved); rafter tails/corbels under eaves.

6. Entry near center of street frontage facade, esp. on gable -front facade; never on corner. L and T Plan
may include recessed sidewall entry on porch.

DC -1.4.3 NATIONAL FOLK COLOR PALETTE
Primarly white, also beige/tan or wide array of pastel hues are principal colors. Roofs are warm -tone or wood colored, but may be gray.

Accents also commonly white or wood, may be ochre, green or pastel.

Recommended principal colors:
#: ffffff
#: f7f0e8
#: b9dcea
■
Recommended accent colors:
#: a5454b
#: wood stain
#: 608179 •#: wood stain
FIGURE DC -1.4.B: National Folk Color Palette
Page525of744
104

DC -1.5 AMERCIAN

CRAFTSMAN STYLE
A renowned architetural style
that is both popular and common
in historic neighborhoods of
Southern California built from1900
to the 1930s, Craftsman structures
can be found in Downtown
Beaumont. It is versitile style
easily applicable to residential and
commercial projects.

Craftsman Style originated in Southern California
and was the dominant style for smaller houses built
throughout the country during the period from about
1905 until the 1930s. One story vernacular homes in
this style became the definitive "California bungalow"
style. Most of Downtown Beaumont residential tracts
developed initially during this period.

The Craftsman style's large covered patios and porches
under low pitched roofs and timber trellises go hand -in - hand with wider windows and screened -in porches. All of this was in service of more opportunities to be sheltered while outdoors. This makes a true craftsman project
suitable for the activated outdoor setting anticipated for Downtown Beaumont.

DC -1.5.1 WHEN BEST TO USE

THE CRAFTSMAN STYLE
The Craftsman style today is still most suitable for
residential developments, from individual homes to
attached products (townhomes) or multifamily. This is
due to it's primarly stick -built structure, high degree of transparency and quantity of windows on facades, and
the amount of covered space at corners and under gables and eave extensions. Still, mixed use and retail projects are encouraged to apply the benefits of these elements to their functional spaces.

Gable extensions with long mass -timber spans create
desirable shaded spaces for outdoor dining, small events, and highly active uses such as bar patios. Additional use of these outdoor spaces may include upper floor tenant
balconies, shelter for bicycle parking, and ADA ramps at entries.

Interior roof -wall junctions and high ceilings with exposed rafter and beam framing serve as highly imageble spaces for retail patrons and multi -family residential entries.

Throughout, an emphasis on timber elements and stacked
stone columb piers and landings evoke Beaumont's
elevated relationship to nearby mountains.

Downtown resiliency benefits include:

Small roof shades, dormer, gable extensions over patio
spaces to create shaded spaces that buffer heat in
variable climates such as inland Southern California.
• Prevalent trellises and pergolas as opportunities to
extend activation outdoors and around the building.
• Grouped windows and multi -pane sashes are ideal for
streetlevel visibility into retail establishments
• Especially for mixed -use and retail: key differentiation from other Beaumont commercial district architecture.
3 -level multifamily (townhomes), Tustin, CA
2 -level retail/ office mixed -use, Tustin, CA
105 DOWNTOWN BEAUMONT REVITALIZATION PLAN

DC -1.5.2 CRAFTSMAN ELEMENTS

1. Low pitched gable roofs (typically up to 6:12, steeper examples rare), gable front or eave extension over porch

2. Large square timber frame porch / trellis supports, often grouped in twin or quad post, sometimes tapered

3. Mass timber construction, or hybridized with exterior 5. mass timber, braces and stickwork, especially in gables

4. Stone cladding up to lower 1/3 of walls; otherwise stone low piers, corner and porch supports, exterior columns.

FIGURE DC -1.5.A: CRAFTSMAN ELEMENTS EXAMPLE
Cottage and casement windows more common than
sash; typ. horizontal orientation and clustered/
multipane.

6. Multiple roof panes and dormers expressing massed
plan expressing heirachy of interior spaces.

DC -1.5.3 CRAFTSMAN

COLOR PALETTE
Principal colors are earth tones, neutral tones, and may include accents in more saturated red, orange, black. Wood elaborations are commonly stained (unpainted), or white.

Recommended principal colors:
1#: faf3ec
IP
Recommended accent colors:
#: Wood Stain
#: 8f5b42
#: Wood Stain
#: 5c2c1a
#: 696959
FIGURE DC -1.5.B: Craftsman Color Palette
#: Wood Stain
#: 619183
#: a5454b
Page527of744
106

DC -1.6 SPANISH

MISSION STYLE
The Mission Revival movement
was most popular between 1890
and 1920, in numerous residential,
commercial and institutional
structures, particularly schools,
churches, and railroad depots. Its
broad unadorned walls and highly
articulated windows and doorways
is suited to a hot, dry environment.

Aligned styles include Spanish
Revival, Spanish Eclectic.

The Mission Revival style was an architectural movement that began in the late 19th century for a colonial style's revivalism and reinterpretation, which drew inspiration from the late 18th and early 19th century Spanish
missions in California. Based on the long tradition and importance of Spanish missions throughout California, it is sometimes termed California Mission Revival.

The missions' style of necessity and security evolved
around an enclosed courtyard, using massive adobe
walls with broad unadorned plaster surfaces, limited
fenestration and door piercing, low-pitched roofs with
projecting wide eaves and non-flammable clay roof tiles, and thick arches springing from piers. Exterior walls were coated with white plaster (stucco), which with wide side eaves shielded the adobe brick walls from rain. Other
features included long exterior arcades, an enfilade of interior rooms and halls, semi-independent bell -gables, and at more prosperous missions curved 'Baroque'
gables on the principal facade with towers.

DC -1.6.1 WHEN BEST TO

USE THE MISSION STYLE
These architectural elements were replicated, in varying degrees, accuracy, and proportions, in the Mission
Revival structures that can be found throughout the
American Southwest and occasionally elsewhere.

Contemporary construction materials and practices,
earthquake codes, and building uses render the
structural and religious architectural components
primarily aesthetic decoration, while the service
elements such as tile roofing, solar shielding of walls and interiors, and outdoor shade arcades and courtyards are still functional.

Typical features include a low-pitched roof with little or no eave overhang, a red -tiled roof, perhaps a prominent and decorated arch over a door, window or porch, a stucco
wall surface, and usually an asymmetrical facade.

The Mission Revival style of architecture, have
historical, narrative —nostalgic, cultural —environmental associations, and climate appropriateness that have
made for a predominant historical regional vernacular
architecture style in the Southwestern United States,
especially in California.

This style is appropriate to any type of building, yet given its historical prevalence in the style in significant hotels throughout California, the provision of generous, shaded arcades, courtyards, and volumetric composition of
building forms may lend this style best for hospitality, community, and dining facilities.

Historic downtown bungalo court housing, Beaumont, CA
Community center and clubhouse, Beaumont, CA
107 DOWNTOWN BEAUMONT REVITALIZATION PLAN
Page528of744

DC -1.6.2 MISSION ELEMENTS

1. Arched windows, doors and covered outdoor shade arcades.

2. Curvilinear parapet gables with stone or tile coping.

3. Pergola areas for protected seating or dining, composed of heavy timber columns, timber roof structure and terracotta tiles, sometimes columns are supported with stuccoed brick bases.

4. Round or square vertical protrusions or towers.

5. Covered entries with timber and tiled awning.

6. Window and balcony decorative metal work.

FIGURE DC -1.6.A: MISSION ELEMENTS EXAMPLE

7. Terracotta or red tiled roofs with minimal or no eaves.

8. Small decorative tile vents or windows.

DC -1.6.3 MISSION

COLOR PALETTE
Principal colors range from simple whites to beiges, with accents coming in bright white or ochre for tile and other detailing, black for metalwork details, and dark brown for timber work.

Recommended principal colors:
#: fff8f1
#: f5efde
#: f8eedf
#: fle8ce
#: f4e4d2
#: e8dbb4
Recommended accent colors:
#: fff8f1
#: c76f4d
#: 5c2c1a
FIGURE DC -1.6.B: Mission Color Palette
#: efd8c:
#: e8cc99
#: 141324

108

DC -1.7 EARLY 20TH

CENTURY MODERN
The broad category of Modern
architecture prevalent from the
1920s to the 1950s has roots in the
International Style, High Modernism,
and Art Deco. It was commonly
used in government and commercial
structures in the 1920's to 1940s.

Most commercial architecture today is rooted in what was once a revolutionary shift toward a more efficiently designed, sanitary, and affordable architecture from the 1920s through the mid -20th century period. Early 20th Century modern architecture followed two trends in exterior elaboration for small commercial structures in the United States: art deco, and art modern. Art Modern incorporated simpler
streamlined elements, horizontality, and extensive glazing.

Art Deco was elaborated with unique motifs, more vertical elements, and vertically oriented windows.

This Early 20th Century time period aligns with the original frontage development of 6th St through Beaumont (once
US -99), which retains some of the original Art Moderne and Spanish style architecture. Mid-century and later versions of these movements emphasized sweeping rooflines, indoor - outdoor transparency, and more open floorplans.

These styles are the forebears of contemporary modern
commercial structures, and developers approaching the
City may desire this approach for it's efficiency in materials, constructability, and ease of maintenance. In particular, these two sub -categories have a stronger relationship to the development of historic Downtown Beaumont and are
preferable for Downtown over mid and late -20th century modern modes of architecture. This style option is intended as a broad catch-all category that guides the City in accepting modern architecture while ensuring some traditional
elements, materials, and elaborations. Development that reflects Early 20th Century comemrcial, industrial and mixed use modern styles will likely satisfy this category.

DC -1.7.1 WHEN BEST TO USE
EARLY 20TH CENTURY MODERN
The Modern style is characterized by suitability to a
challenging climate when horizontal elements and projections are used strategically for shading over ground floor and glazed elements. This is a versitile style that achieves programmatic efficiency suitable for the densest projects at the heart of Downtown.

Modern architecture is higly preferable for commercial
frontage, public architecture, and mixed use development.

Developers are encouraged to employ the extensive
storefront systems, corner glazing, wide span openings, and horizontal shading elements typical of modern architecture to ensure a high degree of connection from streetscape to indoor activity. Communicating indoor -outdoor connection was an early impetus for the adoption of modern architecture 100 years ago and is a driving reason it will remain relevant along Downtown's shopfronts today.

Modern architecture, and especially Art Moderne,
are associated with government and institutional
facilities - a result of Depression Era public project
style preferences. This is exemplified by the Banning
High School to the East in the heart of historic Banning.

Spanish Revival is also prevalent in the California
public architecture, as in Beaumont's first City Hall.

The City is encouraged to apply these two styles for
new public projects.

Townhouses in an early -20th century modern style
Mixed -use example in an early -20th century modern style. 109 DOWNTOWN BEAUMONT REVITALIZATION PLAN

DC -1.7.2 MODERN ELEMENTS

1. Primary facade material white or light gray smooth
finish, brick, tile; metal panel, wood, metal spandrel, and glass brick as secondary or accent material.

2. Flat parapet roof with no elaboration/cornice; metal flashing, with only flat shading eaves/extensions

3. Curvilinear or rounded elements at key corners,
glazing at or near primary corner; retail transparency

4. Horizontal orientation for most windows and storefront apertures, matching top/lintel elevation alignment
FIGURE DC -1.7.A: MODERN ELEMENTS EXAMPLE

5. Horizontal brows/bands algined with flat shade awnings, horizontal slat shading also acceptable; avoid fabric and sloped awnings

6. Single finish upward from base of elevation to second level; finish changes preferred at levels or vertically.

DC -1.7.3 MODERN

COLOR PALETTE
Principal colors range from light to dark neutrals. A
secondary principal color is acceptable. Accent colors
vary widely but only on small elements - less is more
Recommended principal colors:
#: fff8f1
#: f5efde
#: e8dbb4
Recommended accent colors:
#: ededed
#: c76f4d
#: a2a3aa
#: a6543c
#: 747577
#: 8e5b42
#: Brick
#: 141324
#: 5c2c1a
FIGURE DC -1.7.B: Art Moderne Color Palette

110

DC -1.8 MASSING &

FORM ARTICULATION
INTENT
To create buildings that are
compatible with and enhance
the surrounding area through
the consideration of building
scale, massing, and detailing.

Massing should create a
human -scale environment that
is of high aesthetic quality and
accommodates a variety of design
features. Building massing should
include elements that create a
human -scaled experience that
enhances the context of the
site, and is consistent in scale,
mass and character to adjacent
buildings.

OUTCOMES

1. In Downtown, buildings align to the street at ground level, without setback, unless the design response
includes a purposeful set back to provide an open
private or public space which offers a high level of
amenity, including good solar access, comfortable
wind conditions, seating and landscape elements.

2. Building massing should be broken down into a series of street wall elements to reinforce the vertical grain, rhythm, and scale of its surrounding context.

3. Buildings elements should be scaled to respond to
their context by sensitively and positively addressing
the scale and massing of their adjacent neighbors.

4. Where possible orient buildings so that longer side
aligns the E -W axis allowing the winter sun into the
building to warm it and provide light, while minimizing the effects of the hot summer sun.

5. Must avoid long continuous blank walls at street level in the Downtown area, break up long blank walls with
facade elements such as windows where applicable or
by articulating the facade with patterns of protrusions and recesses.

6. Central courtyards, covered patios, and sheltered
outdoor common areas are highly encouraged.

7. Massing and its composition can be visually varied
or mitigated with layering in elevation with timber
pergolas and trellises, tower, chimney or campanile
elements, parapet extensions, and running balconies
or colonades/arcades.

FIGURE DC -1.8.A: MASSING

SETBACK DIAGRAM
INTENTIOtIAL SETBACK
- - - STREET SETBACK
111

DOWNTOWN BEAUMONT REVITALIZATION PLAN

FIGURE DC -1.8.B: MASSING & FORM ARTICULATION IN DOWNTOWN STYLES

CRAFTSMAN SPANISH MODERN

1. Broken up into multiple building
masses which cascade down toward
perimeter - with exceptions for grand
or highlighted entrances

2. Asymmetric building mass
composition, varied largely by timber
elements, roof extensions, and
layering of outdoor spaces

3. Timber elements that interrupt the full
reading of building mass
Tri 40464, 111
L;ii.r1
IC

1. Building mass composition varied with
square or round tower elements

2. Arcade toward streetscape to deepen
active frontage and retail facade

3. Building forms step down in height
towards street/public level

4. Upper levels articulated with covered
roofwalks and open patios

1. Clean horizontal lines define the
building's mass. Can be angled or flat
and often integrated into awnings and
public shading for street frontage

2. High degree of evenly spaced glazing
to break read of massing along active
frontages

3. Clean horizontal roofline with minimal
stepping or hight differences - with
exception for thin vertical elements

4. Long continuous step backs

NATIONAL FOLK

1. Consistent colonnade to the street
frontage(s) - typically centered and
symmetric on multi -story mixed use

2. Second story balconies as a use of
the public colonnade

3. Massing can be broken down
by roof gable and dormers, but
rooflines parallel to street should be
interrupted by dormers which face
main street frontage.

Page533of744
112

DC -1.9 CORNERS

AT STREETFRONT
INTENT
To create buildings that reinforce
the hierarchy of the street and
create greater engagement with
the public realm. Corners should
be important focal points in the
streetscape to help reinforce the
definition and importance of the
street, and to provide harmonious
transitions between streets and
alleys, leading to more active and
diverse public spaces.

OUTCOMES

1. Buildings on corner lots should be designed to
positively define and frame the public realm of both
streets they front.

2. Buildings on corner lots should be designed to
acknowledge their location. Different frontage types
can be used on each of the two street facing facades,
the same frontage type can be used on each facade,
or a frontage type can wrap around the corner from
one facade to the other.

3. Encourage public entry to be on or near the corner of the building when a building is located on the corner
of two streets or a street and an alley.

4. Options for corner treatment:

Chamfer building edges on street corners to
prevent blind corners and to highlight entrance
Recess corners to shelter entrance and provide
outdoor public space seating area
If not chamfered or recessed, storefront glazing
should wrap around corner, interrupted only by
an abutting structural corner wall or column.

FIGURE DC -1.9.A: CORNER

WITH ENTRY DIAGRAM
Each architectural style addresses streetfront corners in unique ways. Here, a national folk style mixed use project (left) and craftsman project (right) provide similar active frontages with differing details. National folk is often characterized by wrap -around balconies; crafftsman provides feature windows or outdoor spaces.

PUBLIC ENTRY

PUBLIC SPACE
113 DOWNTOWN BEAUMONT REVITALIZATION PLAN

FIGURE DC -1.9.B: CORNER TREATMENTS IN DOWNTOWN STYLES

CRAFTSMAN SPANISH MODERN

1. Corner recessed massing inclusive of
entrance with pergola shaded seating
area

2. Chamfered corner entrance
projecting to lot line at corner, with
seating on either side

1. Open corner outdoor dining area

2. Arcade recessed facade on street
continues around corner at chamfer
entrance

3. Rounded building corner at massing
peak to signify main entrance

1. Typical early 20th century modern
retail corner without entrance.

Example of storefont glazing which
wraps corner with exception to corner
column.

2. Chamfered entrance at corner under
neon wall -sign atop shade canopy

NATIONAL FOLK

1. Chamfered corner entry

2. Colonnade continues around corner
to create a seamless public front
to both the main address and side
street/alley.

114

DC -1.10 AWNINGS
&SHADES
INTENT
Beaumont sits atop a regional
geographic highpoint and
experiences greater high and low
temperatures relative to many other
coastal and basin communities
in Southern California. Awnings,
shade trellises and other extensions
of building architecture to shelter
outdoor spaces are highly
preferred, especially facing 6th St
and Beaumont Ave.

AWNING OUTCOMES

1. The retail frontage should be enriched with canopies or awnings, which may be fixed or retractable to
shelter pedestrians and to shade the shop front glass
from glare.

2. Awnings provide should be a similar height and width to those in the existing context.

3. Awnings are to be broken into rhythmic segments to
respond to the shop front design.

4. Canopies are at least 5' deep and are used along a
minimum of 50% of facades that face south or west.

5. Canopies do not enclose more than one third of the
width of alleys to preserve outlook to the sky.

6. When transom windows are above display windows,
awnings, canopies, and similar weather protection
elements shall be installed between transom and
display windows. These elements should allow for light
to enter the storefront through the transom windows
and allow the weather protection feature to shade the
display window.

FIGURE DC -1.10.A: AWNINGS HEIGHT DIAGRAM

AWN INOS I SHADING
- - - 'HEIGHT DATUM
An example of a single mixed use project with varied massing connected by a datum of shade canopies, awnings, trellises, and storefront lintels (top edges). This complex is approximately the width of a 6th street block frontage. This example uniquely represents a national folk architecture with elements of early 20th century modern.
115 DOWNTOWN BEAUMONT REVITALIZATION PLAN

1. The most traditional / iconic craftsman
shade element is the bungalo roof
extension over a full width front porch

1. Flat horizontal cantlivered or stayed
canopies are most cost efficient and
still appropriate
FIGURE DC -1.10.B: AWNINGS AND SHADES IN DOWNTOWN STYLES

CRAFTSMAN SPANISH MODERN
I

2. Trellises and solid canopies (half -
roofs) are often applied together for
extended outdoor spaces

3. Pier supported roof elements may be
attached to building but as a separate
pavillion or wing above an elevated
porch
T Ar
Simple terracotta tiled awning over 1.
an entries, supported off the exterior
facade with timber structure, supported
without the need for columns

2. Outdoor spaces shaded with pergola
consisting of stucco brick columns and
timber shading roof

3. The most recognizeable form of
shade element is the stucco arcade or
colonade

2. Fabric awnings are most applicable
to modern style buildings in this
setting, but awnings should be simple
straight -edged and fixed

3. Historic examples of early 20th
Century modern canopy are
curvilinear with horizontal edge detail

NATIONAL FOLK

1. Covered balconies are recognizeable
shade elements in national folk
buildings. Columns should be placed
more frequently than in craftsman
examples, but aligned with window and
storefront patterns

2. Enclosed balconies are a useful retail /
dining space application of National folk.

3. Upper floor projections and balconies
can provide a shading role over entries
Page537of744
116

DC -2 DOWNTOWN

SIGNAGE PROGRAM

DC -2.1 SIGNAGE

PROGRAM PURPOSE
Downtown Beaumont is envisioned
as the heart of a community that's
inviting and accessible to all.

Ensuring that requires a welcoming,
navigable, and recognizable setting
This is achieved through consistent
public signage and appropriate
private signage - essential to a
quality downtown experience.

Elevated experience for residents, visitors, and businesses is a primary goal within the long-term vision for the City of Beaumont, and especially its Downtown. Signage is
among the most straightforward means to achieve that
because it will ensure that all users know where to go, what to expect, and how to think about Downtown. This
section organizes and standardizes Downtown signage
through city -maintained public signage, and through
design and quality control of private signage.

The first two sections present the Downtown Public
Wayfinding Strategy, which includes an overall layout
strategy for public signage types, design concepts for
a kit -of -parts downtown signage suite, and a primer on the design approach, applicability and placement of
those sign types. The latter two sections together form a downtown signage program. This includes a non-
conforming signage removal incentives program, and,
following that, a signage guideline for private realm
signage controls in downtown.

Page539of744

HOW TO USE THIS PROGRAM
The public signage portion of this sign program should
serve as a primer to keep City staff informed of the
elements of a complete signage suite for Downtown. The
Strategy Framework diagram should be used to plan for
placement of signs in public realm renovation designs,
and to quantify those signs in capital improvement
budgeting. The Design Concepts should be provided
to any design firm commissioned to revise and finalize
Downtown signage.

The private signage guidelines, and related non-
conforming signs incentive, should be treated as
supplemental to the City of Beaumont's Sign Ordinance.

The Downtown Signage Guidelines may be used to
further raise the quality of the public realm with more detailed placement, design, and quality rules with new
developments and enforcement efforts.

The Guidelines are broken up into sections:

1. Downtown Public Signage Strategy indicates
recommented locations for a suite of city -installed sign types, with strategic rationale for their placement

2. Downtown Signage Design Concepts provides draft
public sign elevations to guide a final design effort

3. Downtown Private Signage Guidelines serves as a
supplemental design code for downtown private signs

4. Non -Conforming Signs Removal Incentive is a
proposed incentives program to assist in compliance
118

DC -2.2 DOWNTOWN PUBLIC

SIGNAGE STRATEGY
Public signage should be applied
consistently across Downtown
Beaumont, rather than a
peacemeal installation approach.

As Downtown revitalization occurs,
these signs can be installed in a
layered manner, to distribute the
capital costs.

VEHICULAR WAYFINDING STRATEGY
Vehicular wayfinding still has an important role in the navigability of small downtowns, despite the prevalence of smartphones with gps/mapping capability. This
is especially true for new or evolving businesses and
districts such as Downtown. Navigation to less notable
public facilities such as public parking, special event parking, and least-impactful routes into and out of the area for visitors will all lend operational benefits to Downtown's success.

Directionals should be placed at entrypoints to the
district and well before turning decision -points.

Trailblazers should be treated as a "trail of breadcrumbs" where key turns are needed mid way along wayfinding
paths. Consistent and and clearly City -branded parking identification ensures visitors understand a facility as safe and City -operated.

PEDESTRIAN WAYFINDING STRATEGY
Pedestrian scale wayfinding ensures that local navigation does not requires that visitors' heads are down at
smartphones; further, they support a sense of welcoming accessibility to a district. Pedestrian directionals and maps shold be located where people are likely to arrive or depart a destination on -foot, rather than at decision points. They should be visible from the largest adjacent right-of-way as well as from gathering spaces in the heart of a pedetrian area.

DOWNTOWN IDENTITY + BRANDING
Downtown identity and branding signage announces
Downtown Beaumont as a special and distinctive place,
and also has a decorative role in the public realm. It
should be built separately from directionals, and placed consistently at entrypoints along major thoroughfares
into Downtown.

The Pedestrian Area Light Standard and Custom Bollard
are recommended public realm installations which
differentiate pedestrian -oriented spaces from other
streetscapes commonly along roadways. They are
recommended as framing elements at the Grace Ave
Gateway and Town Center opportunity sites. Custom
or supplier catalogued bollards may be placed along
streetscapes expected to have a high volume of
pedestrian activity to bolster walking safety and the
constency of Downtown as a special district.

LEGEND
••4
1 •I•
•
11 4
am El
PaNeu! ar Wayfindf
Vaibalai arectronn!
Ylclrrl�r Yr'aIFh{a. r1Muluplq}
leali War Tradhlaaaf
Pa dang lien b f rr at vin
ParFkrg Slruc1Lrr Mirqurxr
PEINIFIARE 7' nrrng
P nan OrrVtranal
P dra:Irian Map
n Irrr~li n Volnk
YlFbll Mar,nl1 d MrdnIFrSn
Owe town Arc hyoop
E nlown%thick.lienlitl
Fraena,rk1l'nhit PyFgn
Pod.c.sleinn 'nem UV Stirclard
15190aFINan 4 Ivr►SUUIIQrd
1jo• Plan
OpporiLfu' Scx:s
Rea red 5,11.

PTIrkriE Opflorluriplloi
moiltrei
119 DOWNTOWN BEAUMONT REVITALIZATION PLAN

•
w 1-
✓
•
"r
•1
• .2 �'
Yy� rte-- ..-_;
E
F I • Ir {I
"III Y.

1.11' •P
-• • • • • 4:cV.sl
ZEN
Lti▪ civ
T4 fir'_..

I
4 •
L , w
L...1 Curida Rd
•
. 1 OD
120

�__ .—I
I
r'` r .
i
J IL
lJ'
1 � °11_ .
i
• :04 .
acmi
•
(Oro
0 J5.' 300.
r r.
•I

10'
5'
10 5'
0 4. ..m. ►.a.(
sei.unwwr
#,PUNA
AM. ea
Vehicular Directional Vehicular Trailblazer
(multi -destination)
FIGURE DC -2.2.A: VEHICULAR WAYFINDING DESIGN CONCEPTS
Pedestrian Directional
Pedestrian Map
(w/ Trailblazer Option)
FIGURE DC -2.2.B: PEDESTRIAN WAYFINDING DESIGN CONCEPTS

Vehicular Trailblazer
Parking Identification Parking Structure
Marquee
Pedestrian Information Kiosk
Interpretive / Historical
Information Sign
1 •i =

ar
20 15'
10 S'
10 FIGURE DC -2.2.C: DOWNTOWN GATEWAY ARCH CONCEPT
Vehicular Identity
Custom Bollard Pedestrian Area Light Standards
1 4
Downtown Freeway
Identity Pylon
(w/ Cell Tower Potential)
1- 1O••
FIGURE DC -2.2.D: DOWNTOWN IDENTITY CONCEPTS
Page543of744

DC -2.3 DOWNTOWN

PRIVATE SIGNAGE

GUIDELINE
DC -2.3.1 PURPOSE & INTENT
Signs in Downtown Beaumont
should advertise a place of
business or provide directions
and information. An effective sign
and graphics system functions
not as a separate entity but
as an integral part of the built
environment. Design standards
are needed to coordinate well -
designed signs. Carefully planned,
signs communicate essential
information, while also ordering
and enhancing the architectural
character of Downtown Beaumont.

DC -2.3.2 APPLICABILITY
This Downtown Private Signage Guideline applies to
properties fronting both sides of Sixth Street between
Veile Avenue and Palm Avenue, and both sides of
Beaumont Ave from Fifth Street to Seventh Street.

This sign guideline area of applicability includes the
Antique Village District Area special commercial area
and replaces it's criteria with those set forth within this section.

DC -2.3.3 OVERALL OBJECTIVES
A sign's use of color, its size, shape placement, and
selection of lettering can attract or detract from its
effectiveness. An effectively designed sign should:

Be compatible with the surrounding physical and visual
character of the area.
• Promote the "individuality" of establishments.
• Identify the business clearly and attractively.

Enhance the building on which it is located.

Reduce the amount of visual clutter caused by
excessive and poorly placed signage
DC -2.3.4 PREFERRED SIGN TYPES
While many sign types are permitted in Downtown
Beaumont, the following sign types are preferred because they support a pedestrian -oriented environment.

Business wall signs in sign board area at upper portion of first story;
Awning signs;
Under Awning or Under Canopy Signs;
Projecting Signs and Blade Signs;
Murals and supergraphics not advertising a business
(painted on a wall surface);
Permanent painted window signs, first floor permitted
only and limited to 30% of the window area;
Building signs containing the name of the business at
rear entrances used by customers; and,
• Signs made of carved or sandblasted wood.

DC -2.3.5 RELATIONSHIPS

TO OTHER SIGNS
Where there is more than one monument sign located
upon a lot, all such signs shall have designs which are well related to each other by the similar treatment or
incorporated of not less than four of the following six design elements:
• Type of construction materials as used in the
several sign components (such as cabinet, sign
copy, supports);
• Letter style of sign copy;
• Illumination;
• Type or method used for supports, uprights or
structure on which sign is supported;
• Sign cabinet or other configuration of sign area;
• Shape of entire sign and its several components.

DC -2.3.6 GENERAL DESIGN &

PLACEMENT REQUIREMENTS
DC -2.3.6.1 Clear Sign Message: The following
standards address the legibility of downtown signage
and help to ensure the clarity and usefulness of the
information they contain:
• Use a brief message. The fewer the words, the
more effective the sign. A sign with a brief, succinct
message is simpler and faster to read, looks
cleaner and is more attractive.
• Avoid hard -to -read, overly intricate typefaces. These typefaces are difficult to read and reduce the sign's
ability to communicate.
• Lettering should be in proportion to the size of
the sign. As a proportionality rule -of -thumb, the
recommended size of letters is between one -
quarter (1/4) to one-half (2) the height of the sign.
• Sign lettering for wall, projecting, monument,
and blade signs should meet the following
recommendations:

For store fronts 0' - 60' wide, a maximum letter
height of 12" is recommended.

For store fronts 60" wide or greater, a
maximum letter height of 16" is recommended.
123 DOWNTOWN BEAUMONT REVITALIZATION PLAN
Page544of744

• Avoid signs with strange shapes. Signs that are
unnecessarily narrow, oddly shaped, or unrelated to
the products or services being provided on site can
restrict the legibility of the message. If an unusual
shape is not symbolic, it is probably confusing.
• Use widely recognized logos rather than print/test
whenever possible.
• Make signs smaller if they are oriented to
pedestrians. The pedestrian -oriented sign is usually
read from a distance of fifteen to twenty feet; the
vehicle -oriented sign is viewed from a much greater
distance. The closer a sign's viewing distance, the
smaller that sign need be.

DC -2.3.6.2 Sign Color: Sign colors should be compatible with the building architecture. Within shopping centers, sign color should complement the color scheme for the
center. This provision does not apply to noncommercial
messages displayed on signs.
• Colors should be selected to contribute to legibility and design integrity of signage. Even the most
carefully thought out sign may be unattractive and a
poor communicator because of poor color selection.
• A substantial contrast should be provided between
the color and material of the background and the
letters or symbols to make the sign easier to read in
both day and night.
• Limit colors to three on a single sign. Color is most effective when used simply. Too many colors,
particularly accent colors, may distract the reader,
reduce legibility, and make the sign less effective.
• Vertical or horizontal wooden signs can be effectively utilized in a variety of different ways on windows,
building surfaces or as accent bands. A wooden wall
sign can be painted or stained and sealed for a more
natural look, depending upon the appearance of
the surrounding structures. Lettering can consist of
metal or raised wood and when placed within a sign
band, will serve to unify the building facade. Carved
or sandblasted wood signs are also appropriate.
• Metal sign panels can utilize raised lettering on
metal bands. Printing and lettering can also be
applied directly to a flat metal sign band with letters consisting of wood, acrylic or metal.

DC -2.3.6.3 Placement: The following rules ensure the
location of signage is coordinated with it's related project and is appropriately situated in view of the public realm for legibility, accessibility, and urban character:
• Wall signs should be placed such that facade
rhythm, scale, and proportion is established. In many
buildings that have a monolithic or plain facade,
signs can establish or continue appropriate design
rhythm, scale, and proportion.
• Align storefront wall mounted signs and nameplate
signs with other signs on nearby buildings; or if on
the same building, align the bottom edges of the
signs.
• Stand-alone and channel lettering may be allowed if
facing the street front and may be mounted atop an
awning at first level or in the same manner as a wall
sign.
• Projecting, Blade, Awning and Under Awning signs
shall be placed at least 8' above the sidewalk right-
of-way. No projecting sign shall extend above the roof
or parapet line of any building.
• Monument signs should be setback from the public
right-of-way a minimum of five (5) feet.

DC -2.3.7 SIGN TYPE DESIGN &

PLACEMENT REQUIREMENTS
DC -2.3.7.1 Wall Signs: Requirements applicable to
downtown instances of wall signs:
• Wall signs should have a maximum width of 60% of
their leased frontage and the maximum sign area
allowed shall be 75 square. Signs should be an
appropriate scale with the building on which they are
placed and should not overwhelm the architecture of
the building and the character of the neighborhood.
• One wall sign is permitted for each wall face of the
establishment provided there are not more than
four wall signs for any one establishment. If used for
commercial messages, the message must qualify as
onsite.
• Painted wall signs are permitted when determined to
be compatible with the architectural character of the
building and area.
• If the sign contains a logo, said logo shall be a
maximum of 36 inches in height.
• A wall sign may not project any of its height above the roof, eave line or parapet of the wall upon which it is mounted.

DC -2.3.7.2 Awning Signs: Requirements applicable to
downtown instances of awning signs:
• The sign on awnings should be placed on the awning
flap. The flap should be at least eight (8) inches in
height so that the letters and symbols can be big
enough to read easily.
• The color of an awning sign should be compatible
with and complementary to the color and material of
the building to which it is attached.

DC -2.3.7.3 Under Awning or Under Canopy Signs:: For
each use or occupancy, one maximum four (4) square foot identification under canopy sign per frontage.

DC -2.3.7.4 Projecting Signs: Requirements applicable to downtown instances of projecting signs:
• Projecting signs should be proportional to the
building facade to which it is attached and should
not exceed ten (10) square feet.

Page545of744
124

• A projecting sign should be hung perpendicular to
and should not project more than six (6) feet from
the face of the building.
• To minimize visual clutter, projecting signs should not be located within close proximity to other hanging
signs or projecting signs, preferably at least twenty-
five (25) feet from each other.
• The placement of a projecting sign should not
impede the safe movement of people or vehicles
within a public right-of-way and should be properly
secured to a building in a structurally sound manner.

Identification signs shall be centered on the lease
space.

DC -2.3.7.5 Monument Signs: Requirements applicable to
downtown instances of monument signs:
• Monument signs should be a maximum of six (6) feet
in height, and not exceed thirty (30) square feet in
area.
• One monument sign is permitted per establishment;
only one monument sign is permitted in a
commercial complex which may be permitted to
identify separate establishments or uses in the
comercial complex, or for noncommercial messages.

One additional monument sign may be permitted on
parcels having more than one frontage and the signs
are located at least 200 feet apart.
• Monument signs should be placed perpendicular to
the street and located to ensure that vehicular and
pedestrian sight distances at entry driveways and
sidewalks are not impaired.
• Monument signs should have no more than two sign
faces.
• Monument signs should be constructed of a solid
architectural base and side, of durable, long-lasting
materials. The materials used should match an
architectural element(s) of the development itself.

Monument signs should be
located and constructed to
allow for natural surveillance
on all sides and to prevent
opportunities for hiding
places.

DC -2.3.7.6 Blade Signs:

Requirements applicable to
downtown instances of blade
signs:

Blade signs are a type
of projecting sign, not
exceeding five (5) feet in
width, which projects out
perpendicularly from a building face, which fits within a bounding box with a horizontal dimension which
does not exceed a 50 percent of the overall height of
the sign from its bottom edge, and may or may not
extend above a roof line.

Example of blade sign on historic
building in Bishop, CA with
example bounding box for blade
sign conformance.

Blade sign top may not exceed roof height by more
than the height of the first level (to second level
finish floor) for multi -story buildings, or, it's overall top height may not be more than twice the building
height for single story buildings.

Parapet and structurally integrated building vertical
extensions used
primarly to support a
sign are considered
blade signs by type in
this special area, and
their bounding box shall
be determined by the
Example of parapet extension
on historic building in Beaumont
with bounding box for blade sign
conformance.
width of the signage panel and its height should begin
at the ground level. See example.

DC -2.3.7.7 Pylon Signs: Requirements applicable to
downtown instances of pylon signs:
• Pylon signs not to exceed 75 square feet in sign
area which may be permitted to identify separate
establishments or uses in the commercial complex,
subject to approval of a sign permit by the Planning
Commission.
• In consideration of pylon signs in this area the
Planning Commission shall consider the need for
compatibility and appropriateness of such signage
at the proposed location, but shall not consider the
message content of the proposed sign, other than the
onsite/offsite distinction for commercial messages.

DC -2.3.7.8 Automobile Service Station Signs: Service
station signs shall be permitted subject to the following requirements:
• Identification/price monument sign: For each
service station, one monument, combination price
and identification sign, maximum 30 square feet in
size and maximum six feet in overall height shall be
permitted, and must include all price advertising as
required by State law.
• Special service signs: Each service station may display two special service signs per pump island. Special
service signs shall be limited to such items as self
serve, full serve, air, water, cashier, and shall be non - illuminated. Such signs must be permanently affixed
to the pump island they identify. Each sign may not
exceed four square feet in overall size.
• Wall signs for automobile service stations shall be
permitted subject to the provisions set forth in Section

17.07.110.A.(1) and (16).
• Directional Signs: A maximum of two on -site
directional signs per drive approach each not to
125 DOWNTOWN BEAUMONT REVITALIZATION PLAN
Page546of744

exceed a total of ten square feet in area and four feet in height.
• Window Signs: Window signs conforming to the
provisions of Section 17.07.070.A.(1) and (16).

DC -2.3.7.9 Service and Delivery Signs: limited to one
unlighted sign per occupancy not to exceed two square feet, may be placed on the rear of the building for service and delivery purposes.

DC -2.3.7.10 Directional Signs: A maximum of two on -site directional signs per drive approach each not to exceed a total of ten square feet in area and four feet in height.

DC -2.3.8 SIGN FABRICATION &

INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS
DC -2.3.8.1 Electical Requirements:
• All signs and their installation shall comply with all local building and electrical codes.
• All electrical signs will be fabricated by a U.L. Approved sign company, according to U.L. Specifications and
bear U.L. Label.
• Exposed junction boxes, LED modules and wiring are
not permitted.

DC -2.3.8.2 Fabrication Quality Requirements:
• All sign fabrication work shall be of excellent quality.

All logo images and type -styles shall be accurately
reproduced. Lettering that approximates type -styles
will not be acceptable. The Landlord reserves the right to reject any fabrication work deemed to be below
standard.
• Signs must be made of durable rust -inhibiting
materials that are appropriate complimentary to the
building.
• Sign Company to be fully licensed with the City and
State and shall have full Workman's Compensation
and general liability insurance.

DC -2.3.8.3 Signage Finish Requirements:
• All penetrations of building exterior surface are to
be sealed waterproof in color and finish to match
existing exterior.
• Painted surfaces to have satin finish. Only paint
containing acrylic polyurethane products may be
used.
• Color coating shall exactly match the colors specified on the approved plans.
• Joining of materials (e.g., Seams) shall be finished in a way as to be unnoticeable. Visible welds shall be
continuous and ground smooth. Rivets, screws, and
other fasteners that extend to visible surfaces shall
be flush, filled, and finished so as to be unnoticeable. • Finished surfaces of metal shall be free from oil
canning and warping. All sign finishes shall be free
from dust, orange peel, drips, and runs and shall
have a uniform surface conforming to the highest
standards of the industry.

DC -2.3.8.4 Signage Landscape Requirements: Each
monument sign shall be located in a planted landscaped
area which is of a shape, design and size (equal to at least the sign area) that will provide a compatible setting and ground definition to the sign. The planted landscaped area shall be maintained on a reasonable and regular basis.

DC -2.3.8.5 Signage Illumination and Motion
Requirements: Monument signs shall be non-moving
stationary structures (in all components) and illumination, if any, shall be maintained by artificial light which is stationary and constant in intensity and color at all times (non -flashing).

Internal illumination shall be Light Emitting
Diodes (LED).

All lighting must match the exact specification
of the approved working drawings. No exposed
conduits or raceways will be allowed.

No bare or unfiltered light sources, lamps, or
especially, Light Emitting Diodes (LED) are
permitted in direct line -of sight of pedestrians
and drivers, and must be covered or behind
filters which obscure/diffuse light from their
sources (such as backlighting). LED and other
light sources may be used for bounced lighting
such as in backlighting or spotlighting. Neon
lighting or diffused LED strip based neon lighting
is permitted.

Page547of744
126

DC -2.4 REMOVING

NON -CONFORMING

SIGNS INCENTIVE
DC -2.4.1 PURPOSE & INTENT
In order to enhance the image and
develop a unified theme for the
City, it is desirable to encourage
the removal of nonconforming
signs at a rapid pace. Therefore,
in order to encourage the removal
of nonconforming signs, the City
may offer owners of nonconforming
signs the following incentives to
hasten their removal.

DC -2.4.2 NON-CONFORMANCE

INCENTIVE REQUIREMENTS
All nonconforming signs shall be removed within five (5) years of the date of adoption of this ordinance package update . Upon adoption of the ordinance, the City shall advise all property owners with non -conforming signs of the new requirements and the City's incentive program
for removal. At the conclusion of the five-year period, it shall be a violation of the City's ordinance to have any non -conforming signs on the property, and the City will undertake enforcement measures to have the signs
removed. Property owners may apply for an extension
up to six (6) months at the conclusion of the five-year period by submitting documentation of a replacement
sign to be installed within the extension timeframe.

DC -2.4.3 INCENTIVE PROGRAM
Owners of nonconforming signs may at their discretion
choose to participate in the following sign removal
incentive program. The City will select a number of
applicants each year to participate in the program based on the priority list of signs provided above and the
availability of funds.

In order to qualify for the nonconforming sign removal
incentive, a sign proposed to be removed must have
been a legal conforming sign at the time of its original placement. (In other words, the sign cannot be illegal).

The nonconforming sign removal incentive program is a
four (4) year program commencing on the effective date
of this ordinance. The program is designed to encourage the rapid removal of the least desirable types of signs by providing larger incentives in the early years and tapering off to no incentives in the fifth year.

The incentives which may be provided are as follows:

Year One
•
Free removal of nonconforming sign.

Payment of an incentive bonus of $1,000 for pole
signs, $500 for all others.

Free design service to provide conforming, attractive
sign sketches.*
Year Two
Free removal of nonconforming sign.

Free design service to provide conforming, attractive
sign sketches*
Years Three and Four
• Free removal of nonconforming sign.
*Those participants availing themselves of the free design service must agree to utilize one of the alternative sketches provided and to erect a new sign within three (3) months of receiving the sketch designs. If said new sign is not erected, the participant will be required to reimburse the City for the cost of the sign design service.
127 DOWNTOWN BEAUMONT REVITALIZATION PLAN

BAUME ONTA -c A L I F O R N I
Staff Report
TO: City Council
FROM: Joel Belding, Economic Development Manager
DATE September 17, 2024
SUBJECT: Authorization for Access to California Department of Tax and Fee Administration Sales and Use Tax Records
Description Consideration of a Resolution Authorizing Access to California Department of Tax and Fee Administration Data.

Background and Analysis:

The California Department of Tax and Fee Administration (CDTFA) requires the City to adopt a resolution authorizing one or more of its representatives to have access to CDTFA records. When adopting a resolution, the City is to list all positions that will need access to the confidential sales and use tax records. CDTFA recommends the resolution authorize access to position titles rather than individual names, which will accommodate personnel changes without the need to amend the resolution each time.

Given changes to positions and position titles that have occurred since the prior resolution, Resolution No. 2002-39, was adopted in July 2002, there is a need to adopt a new resolution. The proposed resolution will specifically reference only the City Manager but allow for additional positions to become authorized recipients by transmittal of a letter from the City to CDFTA. This approach will eliminate the need for further amendments to this resolution should positions and position titles change over time, unless CDTFA issues new requirements for access.

This resolution will also authorize continued access for Hinderliter, de Llamas & Associates (HdL), the City's current consulting firm, to assist the City with budgeting, fiscal forecasting, and economic development activities.

Adoption of this resolution will rescind Resolution No. 2002-39. Following adoption of this resolution, the City Manager will convey the resolution and a letter designating additional positions, such as the Finance Director, Community Development Director, and the Economic Development Manager, as authorized representatives to CDFTA.

Page549of744

Fiscal Impact:

There is no fiscal impact from adoption of this resolution. The cost to prepare this staff report was $150.

Recommended Action:

Waive the full reading and adopt by title only, "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Beaumont Authorizing Examination of Sales or Transactions and Use Tax Records".

Attachments:

A. Resolution

RESOLUTION NO.

A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Beaumont Authorizing Examination of Sales or Transactions and Use Tax Records WHEREAS, pursuant to Ordinance Number 288, the City of Beaumont (City) entered into a contract with the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration (Department) to perform all functions incident to the administration and collection of sales and use taxes; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Beaumont deems it desirable and necessary for authorized officers, employees and representatives of the City to examine confidential sales or transactions and use tax records of the Department pertaining to sales and use taxes collected by the Department for the City pursuant to that contract; and
WHEREAS, Section 7056 of the California Revenue and Taxation Code sets forth certain requirements and conditions for the disclosure of Department records, and Section 7056.5 of the California Revenue and Taxation Code establishes criminal penalties for the unlawful disclosure of information contained in, or derived from, the sales or transactions and use tax records of the Department;

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BEAUMOUNT HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. That the City Manager, and other officers or employees of the City designated in writing by the City Manager, to the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration is hereby appointed to represent the City with authority to examine sales or transactions and use tax records of the Department pertaining to sales and use taxes collected for the City by the Department pursuant to the contract between the City and the Department.

Section 2. The information obtained by examination of Department records shall be used only for purposes related to the collection of City sales and use taxes by the Department pursuant to that contract, and for purposes related to the following governmental functions of the City:
(a) Budget Planning
(b) Economic Development
(c) Transportation Planning
The information obtained by examination of Department records shall be used only for those governmental functions of the City listed above.

Section 3. That Hinderliter, de Llamas & Associates are hereby designated to examine the sales or transactions and use tax records of the Department pertaining to sales and use taxes collected for the City by the Department. The person or entity designated by this section meets all of the following conditions, which are also included in the contract between the City and the Hinderliter, de Llamas & Associates:

a) has an existing contract with the City to examine those sales or transactions and use tax records; b) is required by that contract to disclose information contained in, or derived from, those sales or transactions and use tax records only to the officer or employee authorized under Section 1 of this resolution to examine the information.
c) is prohibited by that contract from performing consulting services for a retailer during the term of that contract;
d) is prohibited by that contract from retaining the information contained in, or derived from those sales or transactions and use tax records, after that contract has expired.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the information obtained by examination of Department records shall be used only for purposes related to the collection of City sales and use taxes by the Department pursuant to the contract between the City and the Department and for those purposes relating to the governmental functions of the City listed in section 2 of this resolution.

Section 4. That this resolution supercedes all prior resolutions of the City Council of the City of Beaumont adopted pursuant to subdivision (b) of Revenue and Taxation Code section 7056.

Introduced, approved and adopted this 17'1' day of September 2024.

ATTEST: (s) (s)
City Clerk Mayor
I, , City Clerk of the City of , California, DO
HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was duly introduced, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of , at a regular meeting of said Council held on the day of , 20 , by the following roll call vote:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:
(s)
City Clerk
Page552of744

BAUME ONTA -C A L I F O R N I
Staff Report
TO: City Council
FROM: Kari Mendoza, Administrative Services Director
DATE September 17, 2024
SUBJECT: Authorize Changes to the Uniform Compensation Plan and Position Allocation Table
Description The attached compensation plan has been updated to reflect all new classifications approved in the FY 2025 adopted budget, one title change and additional position request.

Background and Analysis:

On June 4, 2024, Council adopted the FY 24/25 budget with 247 full time equivalent employees. The new classifications authorized included Lifeguard, Water Safety Instructor, Pool Manager, Principal Management Analyst and Senior Planner. The new position salaries were studied through subscriptions with Neogov and Govinvest Live Compensation Module.

Staff and administration are consistently evaluating current positions, staffing levels and individual department organizational structures. The Finance Department seeks to re- title a vacant position from Budget Specialist to Budget Analyst, which is more consistent with industry standard. The City Manager's office seeks to add the Community Development Director position back to the City's classification list.

Fiscal Impact:

The new classifications that were fully budgeted in FY 24/25 budget include the approved Lifeguard, Water Safety Instructor, Pool Manager, Principal Management Analyst and Senior Planner. The additional positions are currently vacant, prior to the position being filled staff will bring back a budget adjustment.

Staff estimates the cost to prepare this staff report is $513.

Recommended Action:

Approve the attached Uniform Compensation Plan.

Page553of744

Approve the addition of one Community Development Director.

Approve the elimination of one Budget Specialist.

Approve the addition of one Budget Analyst.

Attachments:

A. Unform Compensation Plan

BEAUMONT
—ca �iroq NlA----
- COMPENSATION PLAN -
Adopted by City Council September 17, 2024
Effective September 17, 2024
Position
MOU Assigned To
SEIU
Salary
First Step
57 Range
Top Step
67 Accountant
Account Technician I
SEIU
46 56
Account Technician II
SEIU
50 60
Administrative Services Director
Employment Contract
92 102
Animal Control Officer I
SEIU
46 56
Animal Control Officer II
SEIU
50 60
Assistant Director of Finance
Manager/Professional/Technical
83 93
Assistant Planner
SEIU
56 66
Associate Engineer
SEIU
64 74
Budget Analyst
Manager/Professional/Technical
62 72
Building/Grounds/Maintenance Supervisor
Manager/Professional/Technical
60 70
Building/Grounds/Maintenance Worker
SEIU
40 50
Building Inspector
SEIU
54 64
Building Permit Technician I
SEIU
42 52
Building Permit Technician II
SEIU
48 58
Building Plans Examiner
SEIU
59 69
Bus Driver
SEIU
37 47
Chief Building Official
Manager/Professional/Technical
84 94
Chief of Police
Employment Contract
98 108
City Engineer / Public Works Director
Employment Contract
92 102
City Manager
Employment Contract
102
112
Community Development Director
Employment Contract
92 102
Community Enhancement Officer I
SEIU
48 58
Community Enhancement Officer II
SEIU
52 62
Community Services Director
Employment Contract
84 94
Community Services Officer
POA
48 58
Customer Service Coordinator I
SEIU
34 44
Customer Service Coordinator II
SEIU
40 50
Deputy City Manager
Employment Contract
94 104
Deputy Cite Clerk
Manager/Professional/Technical
66 76
Director of Water Reclamation
Employment Contract
85 95
Economic Development Manager
Manager/Professional/Technical
74 84
Engineering Development Technician I
SEIU
42 52
Engineering Development Technician II
SEIU
48 58
Environmental Compliance Program Specialist
Manager/Professional/Technical
63 73
Executive Assistant
Manager/Professional/Technical
51 61
Finance Director
Employment Contract
92 102
GIS Analyst
SEIU
55 65
Grants Analyst
SEIU
60 70
Grounds/Parks/Facilities Manager
Manager/Professional/Technical
74 84
HR/Payroll Technician
SEIU
46 56
Dated: September 17, 2024
Uniform Compensation Plan
Page555of744

Position
MOU Assigned To
Manager/Professional/Technical
Salary
Firct Step
60 Range
Top Step
70 HR/Risk Analyst
Information Technology Manager
Manager/Professional/Technical
83 93
IT Analyst I
SEIU
53 63
IT Analyst II
SEIU
61 71
Lead Building/Grounds Maintenance Worker
SEIU
46 56
Lead Bus Driver
SEIU
43 53
Lead Dispatcher
POA
52 62
Lead Street Maintenance Worker
SEIU
50 60
Lead Support Services Specialist
Police Officers Association
44 54
Lifeguard
SEIU
27 32
Mechanic
SEIU
46 56
Management Analyst I
SEIU
54 64
Management Analyst II
SEIU
60 70
Payroll / Benefits Supervisor
Manager/Professional/Technical
65 75
Planning Manager
Manager/Professional/Technical
80 90
Police Cadet
31 31
Police Captain
Police Management
93 103
Police Corporal
Police Officers Association
72 I 82
Police Lieutenant
Police Management
88 98
Police Officer
Police Officers Association
66 76
Police Sergeant
Police Officers Association
78 88
Police Services Manager
Manager/Professional/Technical
73 83
Police Trainee
49 49
Pool Manager
SEIU
34 39
Principal Engineer
Manager/Professional/Technical
74 84
Principal Management Analyst
Manager/Professional/Technical
70 80
Procurement/Contract Specialist
SEIU
53 63
Project Manager (CIP)
Manager/Professional/Technical
71 81
Public Information Officer
Manager/Professional/Technical
72 82
Public Safety Dispatcher I
Police Officers Association
40 50
Public Safety Dispatcher II
Police Officers Association
46 56
Public Works Inspector
SEIU _
59 69
Records Technician
SEIU
46 56
Recreation Coordinator
SEIU
46 56
Recreation Specialist
SEIU
26 36
Recreation Manager
Manager/Professional/Technical
69 79
Senior Engineer
Manager/Professional/Technical
70 80
Senior Management Analyst
Manager/Professional/Technical
65 75
Senior Planner
Manager/Professional/Technical
70 80
Street Maintenance Supervisor
Manager/Professional/Technical
61 71
Street Maintenance Worker
SEIU
46 56
Support Services Specialist I
Police Officers Association
34 44
Support Services Specialist II
Police Officers Association
40 50
Support Services Supervisor
Police Officers Association
60 70
Transit Manager
Manager/Professional/Technical
74 84
Vehicle Maintenance Supervisor
Manager/Professional/Technical
65 75
Dated: September 17, 2024
Uniform Compensation Plan

Position
MOU Assigned To
Salary
First Step
Range
Top Step
Wastewater Collections Supervisor
ManaL er/Professional/Technical
58 68
Wastewater Collection System Worker I
SEIU
48 58
Wastewater Collection System Worker II
SEIU
52 62
Wastewater Plant Operator I
SEIU
53 63
Wastewater Plant Operator II
SEIU
59 69
Wastewater Plant Operator III
SEIU
63 73
Wastewater Plant Operator IV
SEIU
67 77
Wastewater Plant Operator V
SEIU
71 81
Wastewater Plant Supervisor
Manager/Professional/Technical
67 77
Water Safety Instructor
SEIU
27 32
Dated: September 17, 2024
Uniform Compensation Plan Page 3 of 2
Page557of744

City of Beaumont
Salary Range Table
Effective 9/17/24
Step
Annual
Monthly
,40Y.d!
Bi-Weekly
1) 0id.41_
Hourly
1,506.27
S 695.2(
1,544.4(
712.80
1,582.53
$ 730.40
1,622.40
$ 748.80
1,662.27
l 767.2C

1.703.8';
786.4C
1,747.20
$ 806.40
h.
1,790.53
$ 826.40
.) 10.x_
1,835.60
$ 847.20
$ 10.59
1,882.4(
868.80
$ 10.86
1,929.20
$ 890.40
$ 11.13
1,976.00
$ 912.00
$ 11.40
2,026.27
4) 935.20
5 11.69
2,076.53
$ 958.40

11.98 >42.3t
2,128.53
5 982.40
5 12.28
26,187.2,
2,182.27
$ 1,007.20
$ '1.59
4, 26,832.01

2.236.00
$ 1.32.00
$ _ ..90
$ 27,518.41
2,293.20
$ 1,058.40
$ 13.23
$ 28,204.81
$ 28,911.9(
$ 29,619.2,
168.0,

16.8,
J1,907 .1 t
,. 32,697.6€
724.80
$ 1,2.
26 $ 33,508.80
$ 2,792.40
$ 1,288.80
$ 16.11
27 $ 34,361.64
$ 2,863.47
$ 1,321.60
$ 16.52
28 $ 35,214.36
$ 2,934.53
$ 1,354.40
$ 16.93
29 $ 36,087.96
$ 3,007.33
$ 1,388.00
$ 17.35
30 $ 37,003.20
$ 3,083.60
$ 1,423.20
$ 17.79
31 $ 37,918.44
$ 3,159.87
$ 1,458.40
$ 18.23
32 $ 38,875.20
$ 3,239.60
$ 1,495.20
$ 18.69
33 $ 39,852.84
$ 3,321.07
$ 1,532.80
$ 19.16
34 $ 40,830.36
$ 3,402.53
$ 1,570.40
$ 19.63
35 $ 41,849.64
$ 3,487.47
$ 1,609.60
$ 20.12
36 S 42,910.44
$ 3,575.87
$ 1,650.40
$ 20.63
37 $ 43,971.24
$ 3,664.27
$ 1,691.20
$ 21.14
38 $ 45,073.56
$ 3,756.13
$ 1,733.60
$ 21.67
39 $ 46,196.76
$ 3,849.73
$ 1,776.80
$ 22.21
40 $ 47,361.60
$ 3,946.80
$ 1,821.60
$ 22.77
41 $ 48,547.20
$ 4,045.60
$ 1,867.20
$ 23.34
42 $ 49,753.56
$ 4,146.13
$ 1,913.60
$ 23.92
43 $ 51,001.56
$ 4,250.13
$ 1,961.60
$ 24.52
44 $ 52,270.44
$ 4,355.87
$ 2,010.40
$ 25.13
45 $ 53,580.84
$ 4,465.07
$ 2,060.80
$ _ 25.76
46 $ 54,932.76
$ 4,577.73
$ 2,112.80
$ 26.41
47 $ 56,305.56
$ 4,692.13
$ 2,165.60
$ 27.07
48 $ 57,699.24
$ 4,808.27
$ 2,219.20
$ 27.74
49 $ 59,155.20
$ 4,929.60
$ 2,275.20
$ 28.44
50 $ 60,632.04
$ 5,052.67
$ 2,332.00
$ 29.15
51 $ 62,150.40
$ 5,179.20
$ 2,390.40
$ 29.88
52 $ 63,689.64
$ 5,307.47
$ 2,449.60
$ 30.62
53 $ 65,291.16
$ 5,440.93
$ 2,511.20
$ 31.39
54 $ 66,913.56
$ 5,576.13
$ 2,573.60
$ 32.17
55 $ 68,598.36
$ 5,716.53
$ 2,638.40
$ 32.98
$ 1390
56 $ 70,304.04
$ 5,858.67
$ 2,704.00
558
Step
57 Annual
Monthly
$ 6,006.00
Bi-Weekly
$ 2,772.00
Hourly
$ 34.65
$ 72,072.00
58 $ 73,860.84
$ 6,155.07
$ 2,840.80
$ 35.51
59 $ 75,711.96
$ 6,309.33
$ 2,912.00
$ 36.40
60 $ 77,604.84
$ 6,467.07
$ 2,984.80
$ 37.31
61 $ 79,539.24
$ 6,628.27
$ 3,059.20
$ 38.24
62 $ 81,536.04
$ 6,794.67
$ 3,136.00
$ 39.20
63 $ 83,574.36
$ 6,964.53
$ 3,214.40
$ 40.18
64 $ 85,654.44
$ 7,137.87
$ 3,294.40
$ 41.18
65 $ 87,796.80
$ 7,316.40
$ 3,376.80
$ 42.21
66 $ 90,001.56
$ 7,500.13
$ 3,461.60
$ 43.27
67 $ 92,247.96
$ 7,687.33
$ 3,548.00
$ 44.35
68 $ 94,556.76
$ 7,879.73
$ 3,636.80
$ 45.46
69 $ 96,927.96
$ 8,077.33
$ 3,728.00
$ 46.60
70 $ 99,361.56
$ 8,280.13
$ 3,821.60
$ 47.77
71 $ 101,816.04
$ 8,484.67
$ 3,916.00
$ 48.95
72 $ 104,374.44
$ 8,697.87
$ 4,014.40
_
$ 50.18
73 $ 106,974.36
$ 8,914.53
$ 4,114.40
$ 51.43
74 $ 109,657.56
$ 9,138.13
$ 4,217.60
$ 52.72
75 $ 112,403.16
$ 9,366.93
$ 4,323.20
$ 54.04
76 $ 115,211.16
$ 9,600.93
$ 4,431.20
$ 55.39
77 $ 118,081.56
$ 9,840.13
$ 4,541.60
$ 56.77
78 $ 121,035.24
$ 10,086.27
$ 4,655.20
$ 58.19
79 $ 124,071.96
$ 10,339.33
$ 4,772.00
$ 59.65
80 $ 127,171.20
$ 10,597.60
$ 4,891.20
$ 61.14
81 $ 130,353.60
$ 10,862.80
$ 5,013.60
$ 62.67
82 $ 133,598.40
$ 11,133.20
$ 5,138.40
$ 64.23
83 $ 136,947.24
$ 11,412.27
$ 5,267.20
$ 65.84
84 $ 140,358.36
$ 11,696.53
$ 5,398.40
$ 67.48
85 $ 143,873.64
$ 11,989.47
$ 5,533.60
$ 69.17
86 $ 147,471.96
$ 12,289.33
$ 5,672.00
$ 70.90
87 $ 151,153.56
$ 12,596.13
$ 5,813.60
$ 72.67
88 $ 154,939.20
$ 12,911.60
$ 5,959.20
$ 74.49
89 $ 158,808.00
$ 13,234.00
$ 6,108.00
$ 76.35
90 $ 162,780.84
$ 13,565.07
$ 6,260.80
$ 78.26
91 $ 166,857.60
$ 13,904.80
$ 6,417.60
$ 80.22
92 $ 171,017.64
$ 14,251.47
$ 6,577.60
_
$ 82.22
93 $ 175,302.36
$ 14,608.53
$ 6,742.40
$ 84.28
94 $ 179,691.24
$ 14,974.27
$ 6,911.20
$ 86.39
95 $ 184,163.16
$ 15,346.93
$ 7,083.20
$ 88.54
96 $ 188,780.76
$ 15,731.73
$ 7,260.80
$ 90.76
97 $ 193,502.40
$ 16,125.20
$ 7,442.40
$ 93.03
98 $ 198,327.96
$ 16,527.33
$ 7,628.00
$ 95.35
99 $ 203,299.20
$ 16,941.60
$ 7,819.20
$ 97.74
100
$ 208,374.36
$ 17,364.53
$ 8,014.40
$ 100.18
101
$ 213,574.44
$ 17,797.87
$ 8,214.40
$ 102.68
102
$ 218,919.96
$ 18,243.33
$ 8,420.00
$ 105.25
103
$ 224,390.40
$ 18,699.20
$ 8,630.40
$ 107.88
104
$ 230,006.40
$ 19,167.20
$ 8,846.40
$ 110.58
105
$ 235,747.20
$ 19,645.60
$ 9,067.20
$ 113.34
106
$ 241,633.56
$ 20,136.13
$ 9,293.60
$ 116.17
107
$ 247,665.60
$ 20,638.80
$ 9,525.60
$ 119.07
108
$ 253,863.96
$ 21,155.33
$ 9,764.00
$ 122.05
109
$ 260,208.00
$ 21,684.00
$ 10,008.00
$ 125.10
110
$ 266,718.36
$ 22,226.53
$ 10,258.40
$ 128.23
111
$ 273,395.16
$ 22,782.93
$ 10,515.20
$ 131.44
112 $ 280,238.40
$ 23,353.20
$ 10,778.40
$ 134.73
4174i-287,247.96
$ 23,937.33
$ 11,048.00
$ 138.10

BAUME ONTA -c A L I F O R N I
Staff Report
TO: City Council
FROM: Robert L. Vestal, Public Works Director
DATE: September 17, 2024
SUBJECT: Agreement for the Purchase of Mitigation Bank Credits for Second Street Extension
Description Authorize an agreement in the amount of $200,000 for the purchase of mitigation bank credits for the Second Street Extension (Project).

Background and Analysis:

The proposed Project includes the extension of Second Street from the westerly boundary of Home Depot to the proposed intersection at Pennsylvania Avenue. The Project will include the construction of a new storm drain facility and improvements to existing drainage and culverts, which will impact approximately 0.36 -acres of California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) 1602 resources, including three ephemeral streams and roadside drainage with potential riparian habitat.

The City entered into a Streambed Alteration Agreement (EPIMS-RIV-33589-R6) with CDFW that identifies the terms, conditions, and measures to protect the fish and wildlife resources. Accordingly, the City must purchase at least 1.00 (acre) credit from a mitigation bank to compensate for the 0.36 acres of permanent impacts to fish and wildlife resources.

Barry Jones Wetland Mitigation Bank (Shunk Hollow) has prepared an agreement for the sale of one (1.00) mitigation credit in the amount of $200,000 (Attachment A).

Fiscal Impact:

The cost to prepare this staff report is estimated to be $350.

Funding for this Project is provided by CIP R-12 Second Street Extension. The following is a summary of the funding and budget for CIP R-12 Second Street Extension:

Page559of744

CIP R-12 Second Street Extension (Construction) Project Funding Summary
Estimated Project Cost= $5,800,000
CIP R-12 Second Street Extension (Construction) Project Budget Summary Project
Component
Budget Encumbered
Paid to
Date
Remaining
Budget
Project Management
Preliminary Services
$55,650 $(55,650) $(17,769)
Environmental
Design
Permit
$220,000 $(8,970)
Right -of -Way
Construction
$5,524,350
I
$5,524,350
Construction Management
$5,735,380
This project was awarded $1,000,000 from the Community Project Funding/Congressionally Directed Spending (CPFCDS) grant funding sponsored by Congressman Ruiz. A CIP amendment reflecting the updated funding is tentatively scheduled for October 1, 2024. The summary above includes the proposed grant funding.

Recommended Action:

Page560of744

Authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement for the sale of credits in the amount of $200,000 for the purchase of mitigation bank credits associated with CIP R- 12 Second Street Extension.

Attachments:

A. Purchase Agreement for Mitigation Credits

f)arr Jones Wetland
Mitigation I ank

MITIGATION CREDIT

PURCHASE AGREEMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGMENT

THIS MITIGATION CREDIT PURCHASE AGREEMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGMENT ("Agreement") is entered into this day of , 2024 by and between RBV MITIGATION CREDITS, LLC, a California limited liability company ("Seller") and CITY OF BEAUMONT ("Buyer").

RECITALS
A. Pursuant to that certain Memorandum of Agreement Regarding the Establishment, Operation and Use of the Barry Jones Wetland Mitigation Bank dated December 1997 (the "MOA"), by and among Pacific Bay Homes (Seller's predecessor in interest); the California Department of Fish and Wildlife ("CDFW"); the United States Fish and Wildlife Service ("USFWS"); and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers ("USACOE") (CDFW, USFWS and USACOE are referred to collectively hereinafter as the "Agencies"). The Agencies have acknowledged the creation of the Barry Jones Wetland Mitigation Bank (the "Mitigation Bank") and the right of Seller to sell "Mitigation Credits" as provided therein. Each Mitigation Credit is equivalent to 1 acre of mitigation.

B. Buyer desires to mitigate the loss of certain wetland habitat values on real property located in Riverside County California commonly known as Second Street Extension (the "Buyer's Property").

C. Buyer has agreed to purchase from Seller, and Seller has agreed to sell to Buyer 1.0 Mitigation Credit (the "Conveyed Credits") from the Mitigation Bank on the terms and conditions set forth herein. The 1.0 credit represents 1.0 acre of valid U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and California Department of Fish and Wildlife mitigation for wetland resources, all credits being fully consistent with the Banking Enabling Instrument ("BEI") a.k.a.

Memorandum of Agreement Regarding The Establishment, Operation And Use Of The Barry Jones Wetland Mitigation Bank.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the agreements and acknowledgments set forth herein and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, Seller and Buyer hereby agree and acknowledge as follows:

Barry Jones Wetland Mitigation Bank
Mitigation Credit Purchase Agreement

Page562of744

1. Purchase Price. The purchase price for the 1.0 Conveyed Credits shall be Two Hundred Thousand dollars ($200,000.00). The Purchase Price shall be paid in good funds on the Closing Date, as hereinafter defined in Paragraph 3 below.

2. Acknowledgment of Sale. On the Closing Date, Seller shall deliver a fully executed original of the Acknowledgment of Sale of Mitigation Credits ("Acknowledgment"), a form of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A and such other documents and instruments as may be required by any of the Agencies to evidence and recognize the transfer of the Conveyed Credits to Buyer. Moreover, Seller agrees that to the extent such have not been provided to Buyer at the closing, then if requested by Buyer subsequent to the closing, Seller will provide such documents and instruments as may be required by any of the Agencies to evidence and recognize the transfer of the Conveyed Credits within ten (10) days following Buyer's request. The provisions of this Paragraph 2 shall survive the closing and termination of this Agreement.

3. Closing. The closing will occur on or before September 30, 2024, or such other date to which the Buyer and Seller may mutually agree in writing (the "Closing Date"). The closing shall mean the date that the Purchase Price is delivered to Seller and the fully executed Acknowledgment of Sale of Mitigation Credits is delivered to Buyer.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, Buyer may accelerate the Closing Date.

4. AS -IS Sale. Buyer acknowledges and agrees that: (a) it is the Buyer's sole responsibility to obtain a determination from each federal, state, or local governmental agency with jurisdiction over the Buyer's Property, including, without limitation, the Agencies and the Regional Water Quality Control Board that the Conveyed Credits are acceptable to each such governmental agency and/or suitable for Buyer's purposes, including, without limitation, mitigation for impacts to wetland/riparian values; (b) the purchase and sale of the Conveyed Credits shall be made on an "AS IS, WHERE IS, WITH ALL FAULTS" basis as provided for in the BEI; and (c) any completed sale of any Conveyed Credits shall be final. Buyer further acknowledges and agrees that except as otherwise expressly set forth in this Agreement, neither Seller nor any of its officers, affiliates, representatives, consultants, or agents have made any representations or warranties, or have assumed any responsibility, with respect to (i) the mitigation value or mitigation requirements of the Buyer's Property; (ii) the mitigation value of the property conveyed to the Agencies in establishing the Mitigation Bank; (iii) the acceptability of the Conveyed Credits to any federal, state, or local governmental agency with jurisdiction over the Buyer's Property; (iv) the suitability or adequacy of the Conveyed Credits for Buyer's purposes in purchasing such Credits; or (v) any other fact or circumstances which might affect the Mitigation Bank, the Buyer's Property, the Conveyed Credits, or Buyer's purposes in purchasing such Credits. The Seller further specifically advises Buyer to consult with the Barry Jones Wetland Mitigation Bank
Mitigation Credit Purchase Agreement

Page563of744

Regional Water Quality Control Board as to the acceptability of the Conveyed Credits. The Regional Water Quality Control Board is not a signatory to the BEI.

5. Termination. Time is of the essence in this Agreement. In the event the closing does not occur by the Closing Date, Seller, at its election, and in its sole and absolute discretion, by written notice to Buyer, may terminate this Agreement and neither party shall have any further obligations hereunder to each other or otherwise except as provided in Paragraph 6 below.

6. Brokers. Seller shall pay a commission to McCollum Associates pursuant to the terms of a separate written agreement if and only if the sale closes. Seller and Buyer each represent to the other that it has not had any other contract, agreement or dealings regarding the Conveyed Credits with, nor any communication in connection with the subject matter of this transaction through, any consultant, broker, agent, finder or other person who can claim a right to a consultant fee, commission or finder's fee in connection with the sale contemplated herein. In the event that other consultant, broker or finder makes a claim for a consultant fee or commission or finder's fee based upon any such contract, agreement, dealings or communication, the party through whom such claim is made shall be solely responsible for and shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the other party from and against said commission or fee and all costs and expenses (including without limitation reasonable attorneys' fees) incurred by the other party in defending against such claim. The provisions of this Paragraph 6 shall survive the termination of this Agreement.

7. Integration. Buyer and Seller agree that all negotiations, discussions, understandings and agreements heretofore made between them or their respective agents or representatives are merged in this Agreement and the Exhibits attached hereto, and this written Agreement alone fully and completely expresses their agreement with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersedes all prior agreements and understandings between the parties relating to the subject matter of this Agreement. Buyer and Seller further agree that Buyer has no responsibilities or obligations whatsoever regarding the Conveyed Credits or the MOA except as are expressly stated in this Agreement.

8. Notices. All deposits and any notice required or permitted to be made or given under this Agreement shall be made and delivered to the parties at the addresses set forth below each party's respective signature. All notices shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been given when delivered by courier, when transmitted by facsimile (upon confirmation of successfully completed transmission), or upon the expiration of two (2) business days after the date of deposit of such notice in the United States mail, registered or certified mail, postage prepaid.

9. Attorneys' Fees. This Agreement shall be governed and construed in accordance with Barry Jones Wetland Mitigation Bank
Mitigation Credit Purchase Agreement

Page564of744

the laws of the State of California and interpreted as if prepared by both parties hereto. In the event a dispute arises concerning the meaning or interpretation of any provision of this Agreement, or in the event of any litigation arising out of or related to this Agreement, the party not prevailing in such dispute or litigation shall pay any and all costs and expenses incurred by the other party in establishing or defending its rights hereunder, including, without limitation, court costs, expert witness fees, and reasonable attorneys' fees.

10. Limited Representations and Warranties. Seller is a limited liability company duly formed, presently existing and in good standing under the laws of the State of California, is qualified to transact business in the State of California, and has the power and authority to own, and does own, the Mitigation Credits, and the power and authority to consummate the sale of Conveyed Credits as contemplated by this Agreement, and the person executing this Agreement has the full authority to bind Seller. This Agreement and all instruments, including assignment and/or conveyance documents to be executed by Seller in connection herewith are or when delivered to Buyer will be duly authorized, executed and delivered by Seller and will be valid, binding and enforceable obligations of Seller. Neither this Agreement nor any instrument, including assignment and/or conveyance documents to be executed by Seller in connection herewith does now or will hereafter constitute a breach or default or invalidate, make inoperative or interfere with any contract, agreement, right or interest affecting or relating in any manner to the Conveyed Credits. The Conveyed Credits shall be assigned/conveyed to Buyer at the closing free and clear of all liens or other encumbrances of any type, monetary or non -monetary.

11. Counterparts. This Agreement and any other document necessary for the consummation of the transaction contemplated by this Agreement may be executed in counterparts, including counterparts that are manually executed and counterparts that are in the form of electronic records and are electronically executed. An electronic signature means a signature that is executed by symbol attached to or logically associated with a record and adopted by a party with the intent to sign such record, including facsimile or e-mail signatures. All executed counterparts shall constitute one agreement, and each counterpart shall be deemed an original. The parties hereby acknowledge and agree that electronic records and electronic signatures, as well as facsimile signatures, may be used in connection with the execution of this Agreement and electronic signatures, facsimile signatures or signatures transmitted by electronic mail in so-called PDF format shall be legal and binding and shall have the same full force and effect as if a paper original of this Agreement had been delivered that had been signed using a handwritten signature. All parties to this Agreement (i) agree that an electronic signature, whether digital or encrypted, of a party to this Agreement is intended to authenticate this writing and to have the same force and effect as a manual signature; (ii) intended to be bound by the signatures (whether original, faxed, or electronic) on any document sent or delivered by facsimile or electronic mail or other electronic means; (iii) are aware that the other party(ies) will rely on such signatures; and, Barry Jones Wetland Mitigation Bank
Mitigation Credit Purchase Agreement

Page565of744

(iv) hereby waive any defenses to the enforcement of the terms of this Agreement based on the foregoing forms of signature. If this Agreement has been executed by electronic signature, all parties executing this document are expressly consenting, under the United States Federal Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act of 2000 ("E -SIGN") and the California Uniform Electronic Transactions Act ("UETA") (California Civil Code §1633.1 et seq.), that a signature by fax, e-mail, or other electronic means shall constitute an Electronic Signature to an Electronic Record under both E -SIGN and UETA with respect to this specific transaction.

Barry Jones Wetland Mitigation Bank
Mitigation Credit Purchase Agreement

WHEREUPON, this Agreement has been executed as of the date first -above written.

SELLER:

RBV MITIGATION CREDITS, LLC, a California limited liability company
By:

Name: Karin T. Krogius
Its: Member
178 Shorecliff Road
Corona Del Mar, CA 92625
Attention: Karin Krogius
Telephone: (949) 300-4864
Fax: (949) 644-7410
Email: kkrogiusApboaks.com
BUYER:

CITY OF BEAUMONT
By:

Name: Elizabeth Gibbs
Its: City Manager
550 E. 6th Street
Beaumont, CA 92223
Telephone: (951) 769-8520
Email: egibbs(a,beaumontca.gov
Attention: Vincent Lopez, Project Manager
Telephone: (951) 572-3227
Email: vlopez(a,beaumontca.gov
USACOE Permit n/a
RWQCB Permit SARWQCB WDID No. 332023-04
CDFW Agreement EPIMS-RIV-33589-R6
Barry Jones Wetland Mitigation Bank
Mitigation Credit Purchase Agreement

Page567of744

BAUME ONTA -c A L I F O R N I
Staff Report
TO: City Council
FROM: Robert L. Vestal, Director of Public Works
DATE: September 17, 2024
SUBJECT: Third Amendment to Professional Service Agreement with EXP U.S.

Services, Inc
Description Third Amendment to the Professional Services Agreement for EXP U.S.

Services, Inc. for the Beaumont Master Drainage Plan (MDP) Line 2, Stage 1 Project (CIP 2019-019).

Background and Analysis:

On March 17, 2020, City Council amended the FY19/20 Capital Improvement Project (CIP) Budget to include the Beaumont Master Drainage Plan (MDP) Line 2, Stage 1 Project (Stage 1). Stage 1 was incorporated into the CIP in the amount of $5,000,000 with the source of funds being the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (District) via a cooperative funding agreement. On September 1, 2020, City Council approved the cooperative agreement and on September 22, 2020, the District fully executed the agreement. On December 15, 2020, City Council awarded a Professional Service Agreement (PSA) to EXP U.S. Services, Inc. (EXP) to perform preliminary and final engineering services.

On November 15, 2022, City Council approved Amendment No. 1 which modified the scope of services to include additional hydraulic analysis and extended the term of agreement to February 16, 2024.

On August 15, 2023, City Council approved Amendment No. 2 which increased the fees of subconsultants due to the inflation and operating costs and extended the term of the agreement to February 16, 2025.

The third amendment to the professional services agreement is proposed to provide additional environmental services and to extend the term of the contract by one (1) year to February 16, 2026. The original environmental scope was based on providing a Categorical Exemption (CE) for CEQA. Due to changes in the design scope, the project now requires an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND). As a result of the additional environmental work, EXP is requesting a fee adjustment.

Page568of744

The following is a summary of the EXP fee increase for environmental work:

Scope Original Fee (2020) Revised Fee (2024)
Environmental Clearance $81,835.00 $155,189.70
The revised environmental fee represents a rounded increase in cost of $73,355. This results in a revised total contract cost not to exceed $597,420 for the PSA. A summary of the contract amendments to date including the proposed Amendment No. 3 is provided in the following table.

Agreement Summary
Original Agreement
Amendment No. 1
Amendment No. 2
Amendment No. 3
Total PSA:

Original Fee (2020)
$442,214.00
$61,847.00
$20,003.96
$73,355.00
$597,420.00
Project Background and Update:

The original environmental scope anticipated that the proposed storm drain would connect to the existing 78" storm drain within the street right-of-way, avoiding any construction in the Berkshire Channel where the outlet of the pipe is located. The results of the hydrology/hydraulic study showed that the existing 78" storm drain outlet was not large enough and recommended a new 102" storm drain outlet into Berkshire Channel. This also requires a new headwall in the channel. With work now required within the channel, the environmental document is elevated to an IS/MND. The proposed environmental work includes coordination with regulatory agencies and additional technical studies.

Final environmental clearance is anticipated to be completed by July 2025.

Fiscal Impact:

The cost of preparing the staff report is estimated to be $500.

The funding for this contract amendment will be paid from the Beaumont Master Drainage Plan (MDP) Line 2, Stage 1 Project (CIP2019-019) budget.

Please refer to the following project accounting chart and table for a summary of project funding and budget:

Page569of744

CIP 2019-019 MDP Line -2 Project Funding Summary
Estimated Project Cost= $5,000,000
Grant- RCFC,
$5,000,000 , 100%
CIP 2019-019 MDP Line -2 Project Budget Summary
Project
Component
Budget Encumbered
Paid to
Date
Remaining
Budget
Project Managem
Preliminary Services
Environmental
Design
$600,000 $(597,420) $(224,092)
$2,580
Permits k
Right -of -Way
$5,001
$4,395,000
Construction Management
Equip
$5,000,000
Recommended Action:

Approve the third Amendment to the Professional Services Agreement for EXP U.S.

Services, Inc. for the Beaumont Master Drainage Plan (MDP) Line 2, Stage 1 Project (CIP 2019-019) with a new total contract amount not -to -exceed $597,420.

Attachments:

A. Third Amendment to the Professional Services Agreement with EXP U.S.

Services, Inc.

B. Professional Services Agreements with EXP (Original Agreement) C. First Amendment to the Professional Services Agreement with EXP U.S.

Services, Inc.

D. Second Amendment to the Professional Services Agreement with EXP U.S.

Services, Inc.

E. Levine Act Statement - EXP

City of Beaumont Contract Number:

C21-09.3

THIRD AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT FOR INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR

THIS THIRD AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT OF SERVICES BY INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR ("Amendment") is made and effective upon signature by and between the CITY OF BEAUMONT ("CITY"), a general law city, and EXP U.S. SERVICES, INC, a California Corporation, (hereinafter called "CONTRACTOR") in consideration of the mutual promises and purpose contained herein, the parties agree as follow:

RECITALS
This Amendment is made with respect to the following facts and purpose that the parties agree are true and correct:

A. On December 15, 2020, CITY and CONTRACTOR entered into that certain agreement entitled "Agreement for Professional Services by Independent Contractor ("Agreement") to provide PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR THE BEAUMONT MASTER DRAINAGE PLAN (MDP) LINE 2 PROJECT.

B. CONTRACTOR has requested that the fee should be increased as provided in the request dated June 25, 2024, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this reference.

AMENDMENT
Section 1 of the Agreement is hereby amended to extend the period of time during which the Services are to be provided hereunder, but not to exceed February 16, 2026.

Section 4.01 of the Agreement is hereby amended to increase the maximum compensation under the Agreement as follows: Under previous amendments, compensation was set at an amount not to exceed five hundred twenty-four thousand, sixty-five dollars ($524,065). Per this Third Amendment, compensation is increased by the maximum amount of seventy-three thousand, three hundred fifty-five dollars ($73,355) as provided in the Proposal attached hereto as Exhibit "A" resulting in total compensation under the Agreement not to exceed five hundred ninety-seven thousand, four hundred twenty dollars ($597,420).

The recitals to this Amendment are deemed incorporated herein by this reference. All other terms of the Agreement not expressly amended by this Amendment shall remain in full force and effect.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereby have made and executed this Amendment to be effective as of the day and year first above -written.

Page572of744

City of Beaumont Contract Number:

C21-09.3

SIGNATURE PAGE TO FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT FOR

SERVICES BY INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR

CITY OF BEAUMONT
CITY: CONTRACTOR:

CITY OF BEAUMONT EXP U.S. SERVICES,
By:

By: Print Name: Ga
David Fenn, Mayor
Date:

ATTEST
City Clerk

APPROVED AS TO FORM
John Pinkney, City Attorney
Title: Vice President
Date: August 28, 2024

City of Beaumont Contract Number:

C21-09.3
EXHIBIT "A"

PROPOSAL

exp
June 25, 2024
Nadeem Syed
City of Beaumont
550 E 6th Street
Beaumont, CA 92223
SUBJECT: CHANGE ORDER NO. 3 SCOPE OF WORK TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL

ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES TO COMPLETE THE INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED

NEGATIVE DELCARATION AND NOTICE OF DETERMINATION TO ACHIEVE

ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE FOR THE BEAUMONT MASTER DRAINAGE PLAN (MDP) LINE 2, STAGE 1 PROJECT (CIP2019-019).

Dear Mr. Nadeem Syed:

On behalf of EXP U.S. Services Inc. (CONSULTANT), we are pleased to provide the City of Beaumont with a change order request to provide additional environmental services to obtain environmental clearance for the Beaumont MDP Line 2 project.

We thank you for your consideration of our request. Should you have any questions please call me at 909.563.0525.

Sincerely,
EXP U.S. SERVICES INC.

Christine Brown, P.E.

Project Manager
PW19106 Page 1 of 1
Page575of744

Scope of Work
Task 1: Kick Off Meeting and Data Acquisition
Meetings and Data Acquisition
CONSULTANT will meet with the Client and representatives from the City at a Project Initiation/Kick- Off Meeting virtually to discuss the project description, specific project issues, and CEQA schedule; as well as receive any pertinent project information reports including but not limited to previous environmental studies completed for the project site.

CONSULTANT will review all available Project -related data and reports provided by the City and Client, though CONSULTANT is not responsible for the accuracy of any existing technical reports not authored by CONSULTANT. Following the review of existing data, any gaps in the data and recommendation for correcting the gaps would be provided in a memorandum format to the Client.

CONSULTANT will work closely with the Client to determine what additional data must be collected in support of the CEQA document being prepared. It is assumed that CONSULTANT can use these documents in the analysis of the Project. CONSULTANT assumes that the additional technical studies in support of the Project (i.e. geotechnical, hydrology, and sewer reports/data) will be provided by the assigned engineer for the Project.

Project Description
CONSULTANT will develop a comprehensive description of the proposed Project that will form the basis for the analysis of the potential impacts on the environment, based on the information provided by the Client. The Project description will include a narrative and graphical presentation of the proposed Project, including components, location and boundaries, regional and vicinity maps, and a statement of the Project goals and objectives.

CONSULTANT assumes that the Client will provide Project details necessary to develop the Project description, including but not limited to site maps, construction equipment, quantities of materials imported or exported, schedule, and site plans.

Deliverables: One electronic copy of the Project description for City and Client review. One electronic copy of the final Project description.

Task 2: Initial Study (IS)
Administrative Draft IS
Once the Project description has been approved, CONSULTANT will prepare an IS Checklist to confirm the preparation of an appropriate CEQA Documentation for the proposed Project. The IS will be prepared using the most recent revision of the IS Environmental Checklist Form suggested in the CEQA Guidelines Appendix G. In compliance with CEQA Section 15063, the IS will contain the following, in brief form:
• A description of the project, including the location of the project; • An identification of the environmental setting;

• A preliminary identification of environmental effects by use of a checklist, matrix, or other method, with some evidence to support the entries; and
• A preliminary discussion of the ways to mitigate the significant effects identified, if any.

The environmental factors outlined in the CEQA checklist include:
• Aesthetics
• Agricultural and Forestry Resources
• Air Quality
• Biological Resources
• Cultural Resources
• Energy
• Geology and Soils
• Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions
• Hazards and Hazardous Materials
• Hydrology and Water Quality
• Land Use and Planning
Final Draft IS
• Mandatory Findings of Significance
• Mineral Resources
• Noise
• Population and Housing
• Public Services
• Recreation
• Transportation
• Tribal Cultural Resources (TCRs)
• Utilities and Service Systems
• Wildfire
After receipt of one set of integrated comments on the draft IS from the Client, CONSULTANT will revise the IS to the Final IS.

Deliverables: One electronic copy of the Administrative IS for Client review. One electronic copy of the Final IS. Technical studies outlined below will be provided electronically.

Task 3: Technical Studies
Task 3.1: Air Quality and Noise
Task 3.1.1: Construction Air Quality and GHG
CONSULTANT will prepare the Air Quality Impact Analysis to meet County and South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) CEQA requirements. Impact analyses will be prepared consistent with the analytical methodology, technical requirements and significance criteria outlined by the SCAQMD in their CEQA Air Quality Handbook (as updated per the SCAQMD website).

The regulatory and environmental setting discussion will include a summary of relevant federal, state, and local laws, rules, and regulations; a summary of local pollutant concentration and climate data; descriptions of the affected resource areas for air quality and climate change; and identification/descriptions of sensitive receptor locations.

The California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod) will be used to quantify short-term construction and long-term operations emissions. Daily emissions will be compared to SCAQMD local and regional significance criteria. Mitigation measures will be developed to address any significant impacts. The potential for odor and health -risk impacts are low; and as such, odor and health -risk impacts will be addressed qualitatively.

It is anticipated that Project -level carbon monoxide (CO) and particulate matter (PM) hot -spot analyses will be addressed qualitatively. And finally, discussions of cumulative impacts and Project consistency with the SCAQMD air quality management plan (AQMP) will be provided.

The GHG Emissions and Climate Change Analysis will be prepared to meet City and SCAQMD CEQA requirements. The regulatory and environmental setting discussion will include a summary of relevant federal, State, and local laws, rules, and regulations; a summary of potential climate change effects; a summary of state and local GHG emissions inventories; and historical climate data.

Ca1EEMod will be used to quantify short-term construction, and long-term operations emissions.

Daily emissions will be compared to SCAQMD preliminary significance criteria. Mitigation measures will be developed to address any significant impacts. Discussions of cumulative impacts, and Project consistency with the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) Sustainable Communities Strategy, the Assembly Bill (AB) 32 Scoping Plan, and relevant County policies and/or initiatives will be provided.

Both the air quality and GHG analysis will be documented as a standalone study. The results of the Air Quality and GHG Impact Analysis will be summarized in the CEQA environmental document.

Deliverables: One draft and one final version of the AQ and GHG Impact Analysis submitted electronically for City and/or Project team review. Results to be incorporated into the environmental document.

Task 3.1.2: Construction Noise and Vibration
CONSULTANT will conduct a noise analysis of construction impacts related to the Project. The Project would consist of 5,000 feet of reinforced concrete pipe being placed underground. A desktop review identified that the majority of the Project alignment is not noise sensitive, however a portion of the Project alignment along 1st Street does run parallel to residences.

Along with the residences identified toward the southern section of the alignment, CONSULTANT will identify any other noise sensitive land uses located in the general vicinity of the Project which could be impacted by noise and vibration during construction. Based on the scope of the analysis it is assumed that ambient noise measurements will not be necessary.

A generalized noise and vibration analysis will be developed using construction information provided by the Project Engineer along with published data for construction equipment and established modeling methodology (e.g., the Federal Highway Administration Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM) and the Federal Transit Administration Noise and Vibration Manual).

Based on the nature of the Project operational noise would generally be negligible. Therefore, it is assumed that operational noise will be addressed qualitatively.

The City generally exempts construction except for interior levels which could exceed the City's municipal code at residence. Therefore, impacts from construction activities on the nearby noise and vibration sensitive land uses will be characterized relative to the relevant City standards. Where significant impacts are noted, CONSULTANT will propose separate mitigation measures for the sensitive uses along First Street, which could vary based on construction operations and schedules which the noise and vibration would be reduced where practicable. The results of the noise analysis

will be summarized in a standalone technical study and the results summarized in the CEQA environmental document. The Noise and Vibration Impact Analysis will provide a discussion of the Project's physical and regulatory setting, the evaluation methodology and results, and several different mitigation measures which may need to be implemented during Project construction.

Deliverables: One draft and one final version of the Noise and Vibration Analysis submitted electronically for City and/or Project team review. Results to be incorporated into the environmental document.

Task 3.2: Biological Resources
Task 3.2.1: Biological Assessment, Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Analysis, Jurisdictional Delineation and Letter Report
In accordance with the Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP), CONSULTANT will conduct a biological resources survey and habitat assessment and prepare a consistency analysis to address potential impacts to resources regulated by the MSHCP, including sensitive plant and wildlife species or waterways and riparian corridors. CONSULTANT will use Geographic Information Systems (GIS) software to map the site in relation to MSHCP areas including Criteria Cells; U.S. Department of Agriculture soils data; U.S. Geological Survey data for state and federal waters; conservation areas and wildlife movement corridors and linkages; Criteria Area Species Survey Areas for plant, bird, mammal, and amphibian species; Narrow Endemic Plants Survey Area; and survey requirements for inadequately covered species. The Riverside County Integrated Project (RCIP) Conservation Summary Report will be queried to determine habitat assessment and potential survey requirements for the Project. In addition, CONSULTANT will determine if there are any records of listed and/or sensitive plant and wildlife species and communities occurring on or in the immediate vicinity of the Project site. This task will include a review of the California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB) and the California Native Plant Society's Electronic Inventory (CNPSEI), and the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). A survey area map will be created to identify the area to be analyzed in the report.

After conducting the literature search, biologists will conduct a habitat assessment survey of the proposed Project site, CONSULTANT biologists will document the presence of common and sensitive biological resources, both flora and fauna, within the proposed Project boundaries. The field survey will focus primarily on determining the potential presence of federal- and state -listed or otherwise sensitive plant and wildlife species and sensitive habitats, including burrowing owl (Athene cunicularia). If any sensitive species are present, the biologists will determine the appropriate avoidance and minimization measures. Plant communities will be mapped, and the habitat will be assessed for the potential occurrence for sensitive species. Photographs will be taken to document the current conditions of the survey area. Lists of all species of plants and animals observed during the survey will be recorded.

In addition, the field survey determines if any potential waters and wetland habitats are present on the site and will be evaluated using the methodology set forth in the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USAGE) Wetland Delineation Manual (USACE 1987) and will utilize the Arid West Regional Delineation Supplement. Surveyors will walk the Project area identifying and mapping limits of

jurisdiction with the Global Positioning System (GPS). Suspected USACE/ Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB)/California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) jurisdictional areas will be field checked for the presence of definable channels within the survey area. The surveyor will document the boundary of the Ordinary High -Water Mark (OHWM) and bank to bank features within the survey area. Hydrologic indicators include evidence of inundation, saturation, watermarks, drift lines, and sediment deposits. The boundaries of the hydrological feature will be mapped in a shape file that can be distinguished by respective Agencies' jurisdiction, based on current Agency guidance documents.

After completing the biological survey, CONSULTANT will prepare a biological letter report for the Project. The report will include an introduction, methods used to conduct the survey, results of the survey documenting the existing biological resources MSHCP consistency analysis, a discussion of sensitive plant and wildlife species with the potential to occur on -site, MSHCP analysis, and a discussion of sensitive plant and wildlife species with the potential to occur on -site, and any waters or wetlands on -site. The report will include current photographs and maps documenting existing conditions and the locations of any sensitive or listed species occurring, or potentially occurring onsite. Protection measures for sensitive species that are known to occur on site or in the immediate vicinity of the site will also be included.

The report will include up to 25 pages of text and eight graphics, photographs of the site and appendices. One electronic copy of the draft memo report will be provided for review within 3 weeks of completion of the survey. CONSULTANT will incorporate one round of comments into the final report within 1 week of receiving comments on the draft report. Electronic copies of the final report will be submitted.

Task 3.2.2: Determination of Biological Equivalent or Superior Preservation In accordance with the Riverside County MSHCP, CONSULTANT will prepare a Determination of Biological Equivalent or Superior Preservation (DBESP) to address temporal impacts to resources regulated by Section 6.1.2 of the MSHCP. A DBESP is required when a proposed Project action directly and/or indirectly impacts MSHCP regulated riparian/riverine/vernal pool resources or conflicts with guidelines for specific MSHCP covered floral and faunal species. The DBESP will discuss and demonstrate that implementation of avoidance and/or mitigation measures would result in an alternative that is biologically equivalent or superior to existing conditions. In addition, the DBESP will address compliance with MSHCP requirements and include a MSHCP consistency analysis.

CONSULTANT will deliver one electronic copy of the Draft DBESP Report within 3 weeks following completion of the site visit. CONSULTANT will incorporate one round of comments from the Draft Report into a Final Report.

Assumptions:
• The cost for the field effort for Task 3.2.1 includes two biologists surveying for one full day and associated travel time.

• Task 3.2 does not include protocol -level surveys for listed or otherwise sensitive species. If required, CONSULTANT will be pleased to provide these services under a separate cost and scope of work.
• Additional meetings, agency consultations, permitting and additional sensitive species memos are not included in this scope of work. If required, CONSULTANT will be pleased to provide these services under a separate cost and scope of work. • This scope of work does not include a waters assessment or a formal jurisdictional delineation. Although not anticipated, if a delineation of waters is required, CONSULTANT can provide as a separate cost and scope of work.

Deliverables: One electronic copy of the draft and final report. Results to be incorporated into the environmental document.

Task 3.3: Cultural Resources and Consultation
Task 3.3.1: Records Search Requests & Literature Review CONSULTANT will conduct a literature review, including a review of the findings of a records search through the California Historical Resources Information System (CHRIS) database at the appropriate Information Center (IC). The records search will be conducted by IC staff and review relevant previously recorded cultural resources and previous investigations completed for the half -mile search radius surrounding the Project site. Information to be reviewed will include location maps for all previously recorded cultural resources, previously conducted investigation boundaries, National Archaeological Database (NADB) citations and copies for associated reports, historic maps, and historic addresses. CONSULTANT will also review properties listed on/as the California Points of Historical Interest (CPHI), California Historical Landmarks (CHL), California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) Historic Highway Bridge Inventory, California Historical Resources Inventory, local City and County registries of historic properties, the California Register of Historic Resources (CRHR), and the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). Additional sources of information that may be reviewed include but are not limited to Certified Local Government annual reports and other data, Historic American Buildings Survey/Historic American Engineering Record (HABS/HAER) records, the National Register Information System, the on-line database for National Register sites, Calisphere Digital Resources, Online Archive of California, General Land Office Plat Maps, Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps, local historical societies and libraries, as well as inventory files and data on -file with other agencies that control property near the area. The task will also include a search for potential prehistoric and/or historic burials (human remains) evident in previous site records and/or historical maps (i.e., Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps, General Land Office Plat Maps). A paleontological records search will also be completed for the half -mile search radius surrounding the Project site by the relevant Natural History Museum.

In addition to the above research, a request that the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) will be submitted for a review of their sacred land files (SLF). This search will identify if any resources important to Native Americans have been recorded within the Project site and surrounding vicinity.

The NAHC will provide the results and a list of affiliated tribal representatives to contact for additional information. CONSULTANT will provide the results of the NAHC SLF search and list of tribes in the desktop cultural resources letter report. Note: This research alone does not satisfy the lead agency's