Agenda packet — Beaumont City Council, October 1, 2024 (part 5 of 9)

Fairway Canyon 4C 2yr Proposed Conditions
Subsection: Time vs. Volume Scenario: Scenario - 2yr 24hr Label: Basin 1
Time vs. Volume (ft3)
Output Time increment = 3.000 min
Time on left represents time for first value in each row.

Time Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume
(min) (ft3) (ft3) (ft3) (ft3) (ft3)
3,690.000 17.000 17.000 17.000 17.000 17.000
3,705.000 17.000 17.000 17.000 17.000 17.000
3,720.000 17.000 17.000 17.000 17.000 17.000
3,735.000 17.000 17.000 17.000 17.000 17.000
3,750.000 17.000 17.000 17.000 17.000 17.000
3,765.000 17.000 17.000 17.000 17.000 17.000
3,780.000 17.000 17.000 17.000 17.000 17.000
3,795.000 17.000 17.000 17.000 17.000 17.000
3,810.000 17.000 17.000 17.000 17.000 17.000
3,825.000 17.000 17.000 17.000 17.000 17.000
3,840.000 17.000 17.000 17.000 17.000 17.000
3,855.000 17.000 17.000 17.000 17.000 17.000
3,870.000 17.000 17.000 17.000 17.000 17.000
3,885.000 17.000 17.000 17.000 17.000 17.000
3,900.000 17.000 17.000 17.000 17.000 17.000
3,915.000 17.000 17.000 17.000 17.000 17.000
3,930.000 17.000 17.000 17.000 17.000 17.000
3,945.000 17.000 17.000 17.000 17.000 17.000
3,960.000 17.000 17.000 17.000 17.000 17.000
3,975.000 17.000 17.000 17.000 17.000 17.000
3,990.000 17.000 17.000 17.000 17.000 17.000
4,005.000 17.000 17.000 17.000 17.000 17.000
4,020.000 17.000 17.000 17.000 17.000 17.000
4,035.000 17.000 17.000 17.000 17.000 17.000
4,050.000 17.000 17.000 17.000 17.000 17.000
4,065.000 17.000 17.000 17.000 17.000 17.000
4,080.000 17.000 17.000 17.000 17.000 17.000
4,095.000 17.000 17.000 17.000 17.000 17.000
4,110.000 17.000 17.000 17.000 17.000 17.000
4,125.000 17.000 17.000 17.000 17.000 17.000
4,140.000 17.000 17.000 17.000 17.000 17.000
4,155.000 17.000 17.000 17.000 17.000 17.000
4,170.000 17.000 17.000 17.000 17.000 17.000
4,185.000 17.000 17.000 17.000 17.000 17.000
4,200.000 17.000 17.000 17.000 17.000 17.000
4,215.000 17.000 17.000 17.000 17.000 17.000
4,230.000 17.000 17.000 17.000 17.000 17.000
4,245.000 17.000 17.000 17.000 17.000 17.000
4,260.000 17.000 17.000 17.000 17.000 17.000
4,275.000 17.000 17.000 17.000 17.000 17.000
4,290.000 17.000 17.000 17.000 17.000 17.000
Fairway Canyon_v2.ppc
8/26/2024
Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution PondPack CONNECT Edition Center [10.02.00.01]
27 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Page 32 of 55
Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666

Page 654 of 1299 ends

Time
(min)
4,305.000
4,320.000
Fairway Canyon 4C 2yr Proposed Conditions
Subsection: Time vs. Volume Scenario: Scenario - 2yr 24hr Label: Basin 1
Time vs. Volume (ft3)
Output Time increment = 3.000 min
Time on left represents time for first value in each row.

Volume Volume Volume Volume
(ft3) (ft3) (ft3) (ft3)

17.000

17.000
(N/A)

17.000
(N/A)
Volume
(ft3)

17.000
(N/A)
Fairway Canyon_v2.ppc
8/26/2024
Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution PondPack CONNECT Edition Center [10.02.00.01]
27 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Page 33 of 55
Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666

Page 655 of 1299 ends

Fairway Canyon 4C 2yr Proposed Conditions
Subsection: Time vs. Volume Scenario: Scenario - 2yr 24hr Label: Basin 2
Time vs. Volume (ft3)
Time
(min)
Output Time increment = 3.000 min
Time on left represents time for first value in each row.

Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume
(ft3) (ft3) (ft3) (ft3) (ft3)

0.000

2.000

7.000

17.000

15.000

33.000

57.000

91.000
135.000
190.000

30.000
257.000
332.000
415.000
505.000
601.000

45.000
703.000
809.000
919.000
1,033.000
1,150.000

60.000
1,272.000
1,399.000
1,530.000
1,664.000
1,801.000

75.000
1,938.000
2,075.000
2,208.000
2,339.000
2,465.000

90.000
2,587.000
2,706.000
2,824.000
2,939.000
3,053.000
105.000
3,166.000
3,279.000
3,389.000
3,500.000
3,611.000
120.000
3,725.000
3,841.000
3,960.000
4,082.000
4,208.000
135.000
4,335.000
4,465.000
4,594.000
4,723.000
4,853.000
150.000
4,982.000
5,112.000
5,240.000
5,370.000
5,501.000
165.000
5,636.000
5,774.000
5,915.000
6,060.000
6,209.000
180.000
6,362.000
6,516.000
6,672.000
6,828.000
6,985.000
195.000
7,142.000
7,299.000
7,455.000
7,612.000
7,768.000
210.000
7,924.000
8,080.000
8,234.000
8,388.000
8,541.000
225.000
8,693.000
8,843.000
8,995.000
9,146.000
9,299.000
240.000
9,454.000
9,612.000
9,772.000
9,937.000
10,105.000
255.000
10, 276.000
10, 449.000
10, 623.000
10, 798.000
10, 969.000
270.000
11,149.000
11, 333.000
11, 521.000
11, 714.000
11,910.000
285.000
12,111.000
12, 314.000
12, 519.000
12, 726.000
12, 936.000
300.000
13,149.000
13,365.000
13,585.000
13,805.000
14,025.000
315.000
14, 242.000
14,455.000
14,661.000
14,860.000
15,052.000
330.000
15, 239.000
15,424.000
15,611.000
15,800.000
15,994.000
345.000
16,192.000
16, 395.000
16,602.000
16,814.000
17,029.000
360.000
17, 248.000
17,469.000
17,692.000
17,917.000
18,146.000
375.000
18, 377.000
18,613.000
18,852.000
19,096.000
19, 344.000
390.000
19,596.000
19,851.000
20,108.000
20,368.000
20,629.000
405.000
20,891.000
21,157.000
21,427.000
21,702.000
21,982.000
420.000
22,265.000
22,551.000
22,838.000
23,127.000
23,416.000
435.000
23,707.000
23,997.000
24,288.000
24,580.000
24,874.000
450.000
25,171.000
25,537.000
25,794.000
26,060.000
26,334.000
465.000
26,616.000
26,908.000
27,209.000
27,520.000
27,841.000
480.000
28,172.000
28,515.000
28,869.000
29,236.000
29,618.000
495.000
30,015.000
30,429.000
30,858.000
31,304.000
31,767.000
510.000
32,245.000
32,737.000
33,243.000
33,761.000
34,292.000
525.000
34,837.000
35,395.000
35,968.000
36,558.000
37,166.000
540.000
37,792.000
38,436.000
39,099.000
39,783.000
40,491.000
555.000
41,223.000
41,981.000
42,591.000
43,166.000
43,760.000
570.000
44,372.000
45,002.000
45,650.000
46,315.000
46,998.000
585.000
47,700.000
48,419.000
49,156.000
49,912.000
50,688.000
600.000
51,483.000
52,295.000
53,120.000
53,953.000
54,788.000
Fairway Canyon_v2.ppc
8/26/2024
Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution
Center
27 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W
Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666
Pond Pack CONNECT Edition
[10.02.00.01]

Page 34 of 55 ends

Page 656 of 1299 ends

Fairway Canyon 4C 2yr Proposed Conditions
Subsection: Time vs. Volume Scenario: Scenario - 2yr 24hr Label: Basin 2
Time vs. Volume (ft3)
Output Time increment = 3.000 min
Time on left represents time for first value in each row.

Time Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume
(min) (ft3) (ft3) (ft3) (ft3) (ft3)
615.000 55,617.000 56,433.000 57,231.000 58,006.000 58,755.000 630.000 59,483.000 60,198.000 60,910.000 61,625.000 62,350.000 645.000 63,091.000 63,852.000 64,637.000 65,450.000 66,198.000 660.000 66,930.000 67,673.000 68,423.000 69,179.000 69,937.000 675.000 70,698.000 71,458.000 72,217.000 72,975.000 73,732.000 690.000 74,487.000 75,242.000 75,995.000 76,746.000 77,492.000 705.000 78,232.000 78,965.000 79,692.000 80,411.000 81,122.000 720.000 81,828.000 82,535.000 83,249.000 83,974.000 84,718.000 735.000 85,485.000 86,280.000 87,107.000 87,970.000 88,869.000 750.000 89,802.000 90,761.000 91,742.000 92,745.000 93,756.000 765.000 94,773.000 95,809.000 96,866.000 97,942.000 99,038.000 780.000 100,154.000 101, 288.000 102, 441.000 103, 617.000 104, 818.000 795.000 106, 047.000 107, 306.000 108, 596.000 109, 918.000 111, 2 71.000 810.000 112, 652.000 114, 052.000 115, 457.000 116, 861.000 118, 2 50.000 825.000 119, 617.000 120, 950.000 122, 231.000 123, 447.000 124, 619.000 840.000 125, 752.000 126,857.000 127,949.000 129, 032.000 130,112.000 855.000 131,19 5.000 132,283.000 133,381.000 134, 490.000 135,609.000 870.000 136, 737.000 137,868.000 138,998.000 140,125.000 141, 250.000 885.000 142, 372.000 143,493.000 144, 613.000 145, 732.000 146,847.000 900.000 147, 959.000 149, 066.000 15 0,169.000 151, 260.000 152,333.000 915.000 153,400.000 154,459.000 155,512.000 156, 556.000 157, 593.000 930.000 158,620.000 159,639.000 160,647.000 161,642.000 162,621.000 945.000 163, 580.000 164, 518.000 165,425.000 166, 307.000 167,166.000 960.000 168, 004.000 168, 821.000 169, 613.000 170, 3 72.000 171, 086.000 975.000 171, 744.000 172, 337.000 172,856.000 173, 296.000 173, 657.000 990.000 173, 949.000 174,189.000 174, 391.000 174, 561.000 174, 701.000 1,005.000 174,813.000 174,899.000 174,962.000 175, 002.000 175, 022.000 1,020.000 175, 021.000 175, 004.000 174,974.000 174,933.000 174,885.000 1,035.000 174, 832.000 174, 777.000 174, 721.000 174, 667.000 174, 614.000 1,050.000 174, 561.000 174, 508.000 174, 454.000 174, 399.000 174, 343.000 1,065.000 174, 28 5.000 174,225.000 174,163.000 174, 098.000 174, 029.000 1,080.000 173,955.000 173,875.000 173,790.000 173,697.000 173,599.000 1,095.000 173,496.000 173,388.000 173,276.000 173,160.000 173,040.000 1,110.000 172, 919.000 172, 794.000 172, 667.000 172,535.000 172, 398.000 1,12 5.000 172, 2 56.000 172,108.000 171, 952.000 171, 789.000 171, 617.000 1,140.000 171, 437.000 171, 249.000 171, 05 5.000 170, 854.000 170, 648.000 1,15 5.000 170, 439.000 170, 2 28.000 170, 019.000 169, 813.000 169, 610.000 1,170.000 169, 410.000 169, 215.000 169, 023.000 168, 834.000 168, 646.000 1,18 5.000 168, 460.000 168, 2 72.000 168, 081.000 167, 88 5.000 167, 683.000 1,200.000 167, 474.000 167, 260.000 167, 041.000 166, 819.000 166, 594.000 1,215.000 166, 368.000 166,143.000 165,919.000 165,699.000 165,482.000 Fairway Canyon_v2.ppc
8/26/2024
Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution PondPack CONNECT Edition Center [10.02.00.01]
27 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Page 35 of 55
Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666

Page 657 of 1299 ends

Time
(min)
1,230.000
1,245.000
1,260.000
1,275.000
1,290.000
1,305.000
1,320.000
1,335.000
1,350.000
1,365.000
1,380.000
1,395.000
1,410.000
1,425.000
1,440.000
1,455.000
1,470.000
1,485.000
1,500.000
1,515.000
1,530.000
1,545.000
1,560.000
1,575.000
1,590.000
1,605.000
1,620.000
1,635.000
1,650.000
1,665.000
1,680.000
1,695.000
1,710.000
1,725.000
1,740.000
1,755.000
1,770.000
1,785.000
1,800.000
1,815.000
1,830.000
Fairway Canyon_v2.ppc
8/26/2024
Volume
(ft3)
165,268.000
164,216.000
163,154.000
162,025.000
160,892.000
159,739.000
158,593.000
157,434.000
156,287.000
155,112.000
153,884.000
152,638.000
151,385.000
150,116.000
148,839.000
147,528.000
146,041.000
144,400.000
142,697.000
140,962.000
139,209.000
137,446.000
135,682.000
133,916.000
132,153.000
130,391.000
128,636.000
126,882.000
125,136.000
123,394.000
121,654.000
119,882.000
118,120.000
116,367.000
114,623.000
112,889.000
111,165.000
109,449.000
107,743.000
106,045.000
104,357.000
Volume
(ft3)
165,056.000
164,006.000
162,934.000
161,796.000
160,666.000
159,507.000
158,366.000
157,201.000
156,059.000
154,869.000
153,636.000
152,388.000
151,134.000
149,860.000
148,584.000
147,249.000
145,720.000
144,063.000
142,352.000
140,612.000
138,858.000
137,094.000
135,329.000
133,563.000
131,800.000
130,040.000
128,285.000
126,532.000
124,788.000
123,046.000
121,299.000
119,529.000
117,768.000
116,017.000
114,276.000
112,544.000
110,821.000
109,107.000
107,402.000
105,707.000
104,020.000
Volume
(ft3)
164,845.000
163,795.000
162,710.000
161,568.000
160,436.000
159,276.000
158,136.000
156,970.000
155,828.000
154,624.000
153,387.000
152,138.000
150,882.000
149,604.000
148,326.000
146,961.000
145,395.000
143,725.000
142,005.000
140,262.000
138,505.000
136,741.000
134,976.000
133,211.000
131,448.000
129,689.000
127,933.000
126,182.000
124,440.000
122,698.000
120,944.000
119,176.000
117,417.000
115,668.000
113,929.000
112,198.000
110,477.000
108,765.000
107,063.000
105,369.000
103,684.000
Volume
(ft3)
164,635.000
163,583.000
162,483.000
161,342.000
160,205.000
159,047.000
157,903.000
156,741.000
155,593.000
154,378.000
153,138.000
151,887.000
150,628.000
149,349.000
148,065.000
146,663.000
145,066.000
143,384.000
141,658.000
139,911.000
138,153.000
136,388.000
134,623.000
132,859.000
131,095.000
129,338.000
127,583.000
125,833.000
124,091.000
122,350.000
120,589.000
118,823.000
117,067.000
115,320.000
113,582.000
111,853.000
110,134.000
108,424.000
106,723.000
105,031.000
103,348.000
Volume
(ft3)
164,426.000
163,370.000
162,254.000
161,117.000
159,972.000
158,820.000
157,669.000
156,514.000
155,354.000
154,132.000
152,888.000
151,636.000
150,372.000
149,094.000
147,800.000
146,357.000
144,735.000
143,042.000
141,310.000
139,560.000
137,799.000
136,035.000
134,270.000
132,506.000
130,743.000
128,987.000
127,232.000
125,484.000
123,743.000
122,003.000
120,235.000
118,471.000
116,717.000
114,971.000
113,235.000
111,509.000
109,791.000
108,083.000
106,384.000
104,694.000
103,013.000
Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution PondPack CONNECT Edition Center [10.02.00.01]
27 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Page 36 of 55
Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666

Page 658 of 1299 ends

Time Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume
(min) (ft3) (ft3) (ft3) (ft3) (ft3)
1,845.000 102, 678.000 102, 343.000 102, 009.000 101, 674.000 101, 341.000 1,860.000 101,007.000 100,674.000 100,342.000 100,009.000 99,678.000 1,875.000 99,346.000 99,015.000 98,684.000 98,353.000 98,023.000 1,890.000 97,693.000 97,364.000 97,035.000 96,706.000 96,378.000 1,905.000 96,049.000 95,722.000 95,394.000 95,067.000 94,741.000 1,920.000 94,414.000 94,088.000 93,763.000 93,437.000 93,107.000 1,935.000 92,773.000 92,440.000 92,107.000 91,775.000 91,443.000 1,950.000 91,112.000 90,780.000 90,450.000 90,119.000 89,789.000 1,965.000 89,460.000 89,130.000 88,801.000 88,473.000 88,145.000 1,980.000 87,817.000 87,489.000 87,162.000 86,836.000 86,509.000 1,995.000 86,183.000 85,858.000 85,533.000 85,208.000 84,883.000 2,010.000 84,559.000 84,236.000 83,912.000 83,589.000 83,267.000 2,025.000 82,945.000 82,623.000 82,301.000 81,980.000 81,659.000 2,040.000 81,339.000 81,019.000 80,699.000 80,380.000 80,061.000 2,055.000 79,742.000 79,424.000 79,106.000 78,789.000 78,471.000 2,070.000 78,155.000 77,838.000 77,522.000 77,206.000 76,891.000 2,085.000 76,576.000 76,261.000 75,947.000 75,633.000 75,320.000 2,100.000 75,006.000 74,693.000 74,381.000 74,069.000 73,757.000 2,115.000 73,446.000 73,134.000 72,824.000 72,513.000 72,203.000 2,130.000 71,894.000 71,584.000 71,275.000 70,967.000 70,658.000 2,145.000 70,350.000 70,043.000 69,735.000 69,428.000 69,122.000 2,160.000 68,816.000 68,510.000 68,204.000 67,899.000 67,594.000 2,175.000 67,290.000 66,986.000 66,682.000 66,378.000 66,075.000 2,190.000 65,772.000 65,435.000 65,081.000 64,729.000 64,378.000 2,205.000 64,029.000 63,682.000 63,337.000 62,993.000 62,651.000 2,220.000 62,310.000 61,972.000 61,634.000 61,299.000 60,965.000 2,235.000 60,633.000 60,302.000 59,973.000 59,646.000 59,320.000 2,250.000 58,996.000 58,673.000 58,352.000 58,033.000 57,715.000 2,265.000 57,399.000 57,084.000 56,771.000 56,459.000 56,149.000 2,280.000 55,840.000 55,533.000 55,227.000 54,923.000 54,621.000 2,295.000 54,320.000 54,020.000 53,722.000 53,425.000 53,130.000 2,310.000 52,836.000 52,544.000 52,253.000 51,964.000 51,676.000 2,325.000 51,390.000 51,105.000 50,821.000 50,539.000 50,258.000 2,340.000 49,979.000 49,701.000 49,424.000 49,149.000 48,875.000 2,355.000 48,603.000 48,332.000 48,062.000 47,793.000 47,526.000 2,370.000 47,261.000 46,996.000 46,733.000 46,472.000 46,211.000 2,385.000 45,952.000 45,695.000 45,438.000 45,183.000 44,929.000 2,400.000 44,677.000 44,425.000 44,175.000 43,927.000 43,679.000 2,415.000 43,433.000 43,188.000 42,944.000 42,702.000 42,461.000 2,430.000 42,221.000 41,907.000 41,574.000 41,244.000 40,916.000 2,445.000 40,590.000 40,267.000 39,946.000 39,627.000 39,311.000 Fairway Canyon_v2.ppc
8/26/2024
Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution PondPack CONNECT Edition Center [10.02.00.01]
27 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Page 37 of 55
Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666

Page 659 of 1299 ends

Time Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume
(min) (ft3) (ft3) (ft3) (ft3) (ft3)
2,460.000 38,998.000 38,686.000 38,377.000 38,070.000 37,765.000 2,475.000 37,463.000 37,163.000 36,865.000 36,570.000 36,276.000 2,490.000 35,985.000 35,696.000 35,409.000 35,124.000 34,842.000 2,505.000 34,561.000 34,283.000 34,006.000 33,732.000 33,460.000 2,520.000 33,190.000 32,922.000 32,656.000 32,392.000 32,130.000 2,535.000 31,870.000 31,612.000 31,356.000 31,102.000 30,850.000 2,550.000 30,599.000 30,351.000 30,105.000 29,860.000 29,617.000 2,565.000 29,377.000 29,138.000 28,900.000 28,665.000 28,432.000 2,580.000 28,200.000 27,970.000 27,742.000 27,516.000 27,291.000 2,595.000 27,068.000 26,847.000 26,628.000 26,410.000 26,194.000 2,610.000 25,980.000 25,767.000 25,556.000 25,245.000 24,996.000 2,625.000 24,748.000 24,502.000 24,257.000 24,014.000 23,772.000 2,640.000 23,531.000 23,293.000 23,055.000 22,819.000 22,585.000 2,655.000 22,352.000 22,120.000 21,890.000 21,661.000 21,434.000 2,670.000 21,208.000 20,984.000 20,760.000 20,538.000 20,314.000 2,685.000 20,092.000 19,871.000 19,652.000 19,434.000 19,218.000 2,700.000 19, 004.000 18, 791.000 18, 579.000 18, 369.000 18,161.000 2,715.000 17,954.000 17, 749.000 17, 545.000 17, 343.000 17,142.000 2,730.000 16, 942.000 16, 744.000 16, 548.000 16,353.000 16,159.000 2,745.000 15,967.000 15,776.000 15,586.000 15,398.000 15,212.000 2,760.000 15,028.000 14,845.000 14,664.000 14,484.000 14,306.000 2,775.000 14,130.000 13,955.000 13,782.000 13,610.000 13,440.000 2,790.000 13, 271.000 13,104.000 12, 939.000 12, 774.000 12, 612.000 2,805.000 12,450.000 12, 290.000 12,132.000 11,975.000 11,819.000 2,820.000 11,665.000 11, 512.000 11, 361.000 11, 211.000 11,062.000 2,835.000 10,919.000 10, 775.000 10,631.000 10,488.000 10, 347.000 2,850.000 10,207.000 10,069.000 9,932.000 9,798.000 9,664.000 2,865.000 9,532.000 9,402.000 9,273.000 9,145.000 9,019.000 2,880.000 8,895.000 8,772.000 8,650.000 8,529.000 8,410.000 2,895.000 8,293.000 8,176.000 8,061.000 7,947.000 7,835.000 2,910.000 7,724.000 7,614.000 7,505.000 7,397.000 7,291.000 2,925.000 7,186.000 7,082.000 6,979.000 6,878.000 6,778.000 2,940.000 6,678.000 6,580.000 6,483.000 6,387.000 6,292.000 2,955.000 6,198.000 6,106.000 6,014.000 5,923.000 5,834.000 2,970.000 5,745.000 5,658.000 5,571.000 5,485.000 5,401.000 2,985.000 5,318.000 5,236.000 5,155.000 5,076.000 4,998.000 3,000.000 4,921.000 4,845.000 4,771.000 4,697.000 4,625.000 3,015.000 4,554.000 4,484.000 4,415.000 4,347.000 4,280.000 3,030.000 4,214.000 4,150.000 4,086.000 4,023.000 3,961.000 3,045.000 3,900.000 3,840.000 3,781.000 3,723.000 3,666.000 3,060.000 3,609.000 3,554.000 3,499.000 3,445.000 3,392.000 Fairway Canyon_v2.ppc
8/26/2024
Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution PondPack CONNECT Edition Center [10.02.00.01]
27 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Page 38 of 55
Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666

Page 660 of 1299 ends

Time Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume
(min) (ft3) (ft3) (ft3) (ft3) (ft3)
3,075.000 3,340.000 3,289.000 3,238.000 3,188.000 3,139.000 3,090.000 3,091.000 3,043.000 2,996.000 2,950.000 2,905.000 3,105.000 2,860.000 2,816.000 2,773.000 2,730.000 2,688.000 3,120.000 2,647.000 2,606.000 2,566.000 2,527.000 2,488.000 3,135.000 2,449.000 2,412.000 2,375.000 2,338.000 2,302.000 3,150.000 2,267.000 2,232.000 2,198.000 2,164.000 2,130.000 3,165.000 2,098.000 2,065.000 2,034.000 2,002.000 1,972.000 3,180.000 1,941.000 1,911.000 1,882.000 1,853.000 1,824.000 3,195.000 1,796.000 1,769.000 1,742.000 1,715.000 1,688.000 3,210.000 1,662.000 1,637.000 1,612.000 1,587.000 1,562.000 3,225.000 1,538.000 1,515.000 1,491.000 1,468.000 1,446.000 3,240.000 1,424.000 1,402.000 1,380.000 1,359.000 1,338.000 3,255.000 1,317.000 1,297.000 1,277.000 1,258.000 1,238.000 3,270.000 1,219.000 1,200.000 1,182.000 1,164.000 1,146.000 3,285.000 1,128.000 1,111.000 1,094.000 1,077.000 1,060.000 3,300.000 1,044.000 1,028.000 1,012.000 997.000 981.000 3,315.000 966.000 951.000 937.000 922.000 908.000
3,330.000 894.000 880.000 867.000 853.000 840.000
3,345.000 827.000 815.000 802.000 790.000 778.000
3,360.000 766.000 754.000 742.000 731.000 720.000
3,375.000 709.000 698.000 687.000 676.000 666.000
3,390.000 656.000 646.000 636.000 626.000 616.000
3,405.000 607.000 597.000 588.000 579.000 570.000
3,420.000 562.000 553.000 544.000 536.000 528.000
3,435.000 520.000 512.000 504.000 496.000 488.000
3,450.000 481.000 474.000 466.000 459.000 452.000
3,465.000 445.000 438.000 431.000 425.000 418.000
3,480.000 412.000 406.000 399.000 393.000 387.000
3,495.000 381.000 375.000 369.000 364.000 358.000
3,510.000 353.000 347.000 342.000 337.000 331.000
3,525.000 326.000 321.000 316.000 312.000 307.000
3,540.000 302.000 297.000 293.000 288.000 284.000
3,555.000 280.000 275.000 271.000 267.000 263.000
3,570.000 259.000 255.000 251.000 247.000 243.000
3,585.000 239.000 236.000 232.000 228.000 225.000
3,600.000 222.000 218.000 215.000 211.000 208.000
3,615.000 205.000 202.000 199.000 196.000 193.000
3,630.000 190.000 187.000 184.000 181.000 178.000
3,645.000 176.000 173.000 170.000 168.000 165.000
3,660.000 162.000 160.000 157.000 155.000 153.000
3,675.000 150.000 148.000 146.000 144.000 141.000
Fairway Canyon_v2.ppc
8/26/2024
Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution PondPack CONNECT Edition Center [10.02.00.01]
27 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Page 39 of 55
Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666

Page 661 of 1299 ends

Time Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume
(min) (ft3) (ft3) (ft3) (ft3) (ft3)
3,690.000 139.000 137.000 135.000 133.000 131.000
3,705.000 129.000 127.000 125.000 123.000 121.000
3,720.000 119.000 117.000 116.000 114.000 112.000
3,735.000 110.000 109.000 107.000 105.000 104.000
3,750.000 102.000 100.000 99.000 97.000 96.000
3,765.000 94.000 93.000 92.000 90.000 89.000
3,780.000 87.000 86.000 85.000 83.000 82.000
3,795.000 81.000 80.000 78.000 77.000 76.000
3,810.000 75.000 74.000 73.000 71.000 70.000
3,825.000 69.000 68.000 67.000 66.000 65.000
3,840.000 64.000 63.000 62.000 61.000 60.000
3,855.000 59.000 58.000 57.000 57.000 56.000
3,870.000 55.000 54.000 53.000 52.000 52.000
3,885.000 51.000 50.000 49.000 48.000 48.000
3,900.000 47.000 46.000 46.000 45.000 44.000
3,915.000 43.000 43.000 42.000 42.000 41.000
3,930.000 40.000 40.000 39.000 38.000 38.000
3,945.000 37.000 37.000 36.000 36.000 35.000
3,960.000 34.000 34.000 33.000 33.000 32.000
3,975.000 32.000 31.000 31.000 30.000 30.000
3,990.000 30.000 29.000 29.000 28.000 28.000
4,005.000 27.000 27.000 26.000 26.000 26.000
4,020.000 25.000 25.000 25.000 24.000 24.000
4,035.000 23.000 23.000 23.000 22.000 22.000
4,050.000 22.000 21.000 21.000 21.000 20.000
4,065.000 20.000 20.000 19.000 19.000 19.000
4,080.000 19.000 18.000 18.000 18.000 17.000
4,095.000 17.000 17.000 17.000 16.000 16.000
4,110.000 16.000 16.000 15.000 15.000 15.000
4,125.000 15.000 14.000 14.000 14.000 14.000
4,140.000 14.000 13.000 13.000 13.000 13.000
4,155.000 13.000 12.000 12.000 12.000 12.000
4,170.000 12.000 11.000 11.000 11.000 11.000
4,185.000 11.000 11.000 10.000 10.000 10.000
4,200.000 10.000 10.000 10.000 10.000 9.000
4,215.000 9.000 9.000 9.000 9.000 9.000
4,230.000 9.000 8.000 8.000 8.000 8.000
4,245.000 8.000 8.000 8.000 8.000 7.000
4,260.000 7.000 7.000 7.000 7.000 7.000
4,275.000 7.000 7.000 7.000 6.000 6.000
4,290.000 6.000 6.000 6.000 6.000 6.000
Fairway Canyon_v2.ppc
8/26/2024
Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution PondPack CONNECT Edition Center [10.02.00.01]
27 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Page 40 of 55
Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666

Page 662 of 1299 ends

Time Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume
(min) (ft3) (ft3) (ft3) (ft3) (ft3)
4,305.000 1 6.000 1 6.000 1 6.000 1 6.000 1 5.000
4,320.000 5.000 (N/A) (N/A) (N/A) (N/A)
Fairway Canyon_v2.ppc
8/26/2024
Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution PondPack CONNECT Edition Center [10.02.00.01]
27 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Page 41 of 55
Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666

Page 663 of 1299 ends

Fairway Canyon 4C 2yr Proposed Conditions
Subsection: Outlet Input Data Scenario: Scenario - 2yr 24hr Label: Outlet Basins
Requested Pond Water Surface Elevations
Minimum (Headwater)
Increment (Headwater)
Maximum (Headwater)
2,211.50 ft

0.50 ft
2,227.00 ft
Outlet Connectivity
Structure Type Outlet ID Direction Outfall
El
(ft)
E2
(ft)
Orifice -Circular
Orifice - 1
Forward
TW
2,217.26
2,227.00
Stand Pipe
Riser - 1
Forward
TW
2,221.98
2,227.00
User Defined
Underdrain
Forward
TW

0.00 2,227.00
Table
Tailwater Settings
Tailwater
(N/A)
(N/A)
Fairway Canyon_v2.ppc
8/26/2024
Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution PondPack CONNECT Edition Center [10.02.00.01]
27 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Page 42 of 55
Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666

Page 664 of 1299 ends

Fairway Canyon 4C 2yr Proposed Conditions
Subsection: Outlet Input Data Scenario: Scenario - 2yr 24hr Label: Outlet Basins
Structure ID: Underdrain
Structure Type: User Defined Table
Elevation Flow
(ft) (ft3/s)
Fairway Canyon_v2.ppc
8/26/2024
2,211.50
2,212.00
2,213.00
2,214.00
2,215.00
2,216.00
2,217.00
2,218.00
2,219.00
2,220.00
2,221.00
2,222.00
2,223.00
2,224.00
2,225.00
2,226.00
2,227.00

0.00000

2.66204

2.66204
Structure ID: Orifice - 1
Structure Type: Orifice -Circular
Number of Openings 1
Elevation 2,217.26 ft
Orifice Diameter 15.0 in
Orifice Coefficient 0.600
Structure ID: Riser - 1
Structure Type: Stand Pipe
Number of Openings 1
Elevation 2,221.98 ft
Diameter 24.0 in
Orifice Area 3.1 ft2
Orifice Coefficient 0.600
Weir Length 6.28 ft
Weir Coefficient 3.00 (ft^0.5)/s
K Reverse 1.000
Manning's n 0.000
Kev, Charged Riser 0.000
Weir Submergence False
Orifice H to crest True
Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution PondPack CONNECT Edition Center [10.02.00.01]
27 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Page 43 of 55
Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666

Page 665 of 1299 ends

Fairway Canyon 4C 2yr Proposed Conditions
Subsection: Outlet Input Data Scenario: Scenario - 2yr 24hr Label: Outlet Basins
Structure ID: TW
Structure Type: TW Setup, DS Channel
Tailwater Type Free Outfall
Convergence Tolerances
Fairway Canyon_v2.ppc
8/26/2024
Maximum Iterations
Tailwater Tolerance
(Minimum)
Tailwater Tolerance
(Maximum)
Headwater Tolerance
(Minimum)
Headwater Tolerance
(Maximum)
Flow Tolerance (Minimum)
Flow Tolerance (Maximum)
30 0.01 ft

0.50 ft

0.01 ft

0.50 ft

0.001 ft3/s

10.000 ft3/s
Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution PondPack CONNECT Edition Center [10.02.00.01]
27 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Page 44 of 55
Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666

Page 666 of 1299 ends

Fairway Canyon 4C 2yr Proposed Conditions
Subsection: Outlet Input Data Scenario: Scenario - 2yr 24hr Label: Outlet Basin2
Requested Pond Water Surface Elevations
Minimum (Headwater)
Increment (Headwater)
Maximum (Headwater)
2,281.50 ft

0.50 ft
2,292.00 ft
Outlet Connectivity
Structure Type Outlet ID Direction Outfall
El
(ft)
E2
(ft)
Orifice -Circular
Orifice - 2
Forward
TW
2,286.73
2,292.00
Stand Pipe
Riser - 2
Forward
TW
2,288.00
2,292.00
Orifice -Circular
Underdrain
Forward
TW
2,281.50
2,292.00
Tailwater Settings
Tailwater
(N/A)
(N/A)
Fairway Canyon_v2.ppc
8/26/2024
Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution PondPack CONNECT Edition Center [10.02.00.01]
27 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Page 45 of 55
Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666

Page 667 of 1299 ends

Fairway Canyon 4C 2yr Proposed Conditions
Subsection: Outlet Input Data Scenario: Scenario - 2yr 24hr Label: Outlet Basin2
Structure ID: Riser - 2
Structure Type: Stand Pipe
Number of Openings 1
Elevation 2,288.00 ft
Diameter 24.0 in
Orifice Area 3.1 ft2
Orifice Coefficient 0.600
Weir Length 6.28 ft
Weir Coefficient 3.00 (ft^0.5)/s
K Reverse 1.000
Manning's n 0.000
Key, Charged Riser 0.000
Weir Submergence False
Orifice H to crest True
Structure ID: Orifice - 2
Structure Type: Orifice -Circular
Number of Openings 1
Elevation 2,286.73 ft
Orifice Diameter 5.0 in
Orifice Coefficient 0.600
Structure ID: Underdrain
Structure Type: Orifice -Circular
Number of Openings 1
Elevation 2,281.50 ft
Orifice Diameter 6.0 in
Orifice Coefficient 0.600
Structure ID: TW
Structure Type: TW Setup, DS Channel
Tailwater Type Free Outfall
Convergence Tolerances
Fairway Canyon_v2.ppc
8/26/2024
Maximum Iterations
Tailwater Tolerance
(Minimum)
Tailwater Tolerance
(Maximum)
Headwater Tolerance
(Minimum)
Headwater Tolerance
(Maximum)
30 0.01 ft

0.50 ft

0.01 ft

0.50 ft
Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution PondPack CONNECT Edition Center [10.02.00.01]
27 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Page 46 of 55
Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666

Page 668 of 1299 ends

Fairway Canyon 4C 2yr Proposed Conditions
Subsection: Outlet Input Data Scenario: Scenario - 2yr 24hr Label: Outlet Basin2
Convergence Tolerances
Fairway Canyon_v2.ppc
8/26/2024
Flow Tolerance (Minimum)
Flow Tolerance (Maximum)

0.001 ft3/s

10.000 ft3/s
Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution PondPack CONNECT Edition Center [10.02.00.01]
27 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Page 47 of 55
Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666

Page 669 of 1299 ends

Fairway Canyon 4C 2yr Proposed Conditions
Subsection: Elevation -Volume -Flow Table (Pond) Scenario: Scenario - 2yr 24hr Label: Basin 1
Infiltration
Infiltration Method
(Computed)
No Infiltration
Initial Conditions
Elevation (Water Surface,
Initial)
Volume (Initial)
Flow (Initial Outlet)
Flow (Initial Infiltration)
Flow (Initial, Total)
Time Increment
2,211.50 ft

0.000 ft3

0.00000 ft3/s

3.000 min
Elevation
(ft)
Outflow
(ft3/s)
Storage
(ft3)
Area
(ft2)
Infiltration
(ft3/s)
Flow (Total)
(ft3/s)
2S/t + 0
(ft3/s)
2,211.50

0.00000

0.000
9,200

0.00000

0.00000
2,212.00

2.66204
4,600.000
9,200

0.00000

2.66204

53.77315
2,212.50

2.66204
9,194.186
8,050

0.00000

2.66204
104.81966
2,213.00

2.66204
13,219.186
8,050

0.00000

2.66204
149.54188
2,213.50

2.66204
17,244.186
8,050

0.00000

2.66204
194.26410
2,214.00

2.66204
21,337.541
23,000

0.00000

2.66204
239.74583
2,214.50

2.66204
34,752.040
30,850

0.00000

2.66204
388.79582
2,215.00

2.66204
52,379.430
39,851

0.00000

2.66204
584.65570
2,215.50

2.66204
72,892.805
42,214

0.00000

2.66204
812.58210
2,216.00

2.66204
94,604.396
44,644

0.00000

2.66204
1,053.82199
2,216.50

2.66204
117,531.609
47,076

0.00000

2.66204
1,308.56880
2,217.00

2.66204
141,690.666
49,571

0.00000

2.66204
1,577.00278
2,217.26

2.66204
154,747.335
50,867

0.00000

2.66204
1,722.07687
2,217.50

2.87636
167,100.503
52,078

0.00000

2.87636
1,859.54862
2,218.00

4.48605
193,779.172
54,647

0.00000

4.48605
2,157.58797
2,218.50

7.11264
221,747.163
57,235

0.00000

7.11264
2,470.97000
2,219.00

8.89890
251,024.319
59,883

0.00000

8.89890
2,798.05800
2,219.50

10.16815
281,627.837
62,540

0.00000

10.16815
3,139.36634
2,220.00

11.25185
313,574.173
65,255

0.00000

11.25185
3,495.40933
2,220.50

12.21338
346,881.771
67,985

0.00000

12.21338
3,866.45528
2,221.00

13.08660
381,568.506
70,771

0.00000

13.08660
4,252.73666
2,221.50

13.89212
417,651.172
73,568

0.00000

13.89212
4,654.46070
2,221.98

14.62029
453,924.000
76,328

0.00000

14.62029
5,058.22029
2,222.00

14.68175
455,145.981
76,420

0.00000

14.68175
5,071.85931
2,222.50

22.33742
494,067.597
79,275

0.00000

22.33742
5,511.97739
2,223.00

31.26142
534,430.077
82,183

0.00000

31.26142
5,969.37338
2,223.50

35.27539
576,248.051
85,097

0.00000

35.27539
6,438.03151
2,224.00

38.73699
619,535.612
88,062

0.00000

38.73699
6,922.46602
2,224.50

41.83742
664,307.363
91,034

0.00000

41.83742
7,423.03035
Fairway Canyon_v2.ppc
8/26/2024
Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution
Center
27 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W
Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666
PondPack CONNECT Edition
[10.02.00.01]

Page 48 of 55 ends

Page 670 of 1299 ends

Fairway Canyon 4C 2yr Proposed Conditions
Subsection: Elevation -Volume -Flow Table (Pond) Scenario: Scenario - 2yr 24hr Label: Basin 1
Elevation Outflow Storage Area Infiltration Flow (Total) 25/t + 0 (ft) (ft3/s) (ft3) (ft2) (ft3/s) (ft3/s) (ft3/s)
2,225.00 44.67633 710,577.427 94,055 0.00000 44.67633 7,939.98107 2,225.50 47.31375 758,360.455 97,085 0.00000 47.31375 8,473.54103 2,226.00 49.78933 807,670.676 100,164 0.00000 49.78933 9,023.90795 2,226.50 52.13092 858,698.398 103,959 0.00000 52.13092 9,593.22422 2,227.00 54.35904 911,641.436 107,825 0.00000 54.35904 10,183.70833 Fairway Canyon_v2.ppc
8/26/2024
Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution PondPack CONNECT Edition Center [10.02.00.01]
27 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Page 49 of 55
Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666

Page 671 of 1299 ends

Fairway Canyon 4C 2yr Proposed Conditions
Subsection: Level Pool Pond Routing Summary Scenario: Scenario - 2yr 24hr Label: Basin 1 (IN)
Infiltration
Infiltration Method
(Computed)
No Infiltration
Initial Conditions
Elevation (Water Surface,
Initial)
Volume (Initial)
Flow (Initial Outlet)
Flow (Initial Infiltration)
Flow (Initial, Total)
Time Increment
2,211.50 ft

0.000 ft3

0.00000 ft3/s

3.000 min
Inflow/Outflow Hydrograph Summary
Flow (Peak In)
Flow (Peak Outlet)

25.71000 ft3/s

12.44280 ft3/s
Time to Peak (Flow, In)
Time to Peak (Flow, Outlet)
810.000 min
969.000 min
Elevation (Water Surface,
Peak)
Volume (Peak)
2,220.63 ft
355,860.354 ft3
Mass Balance (ft3)
Volume (Initial)
Volume (Total Inflow)
Volume (Total Infiltration)
Volume (Total Outlet
Outflow)
Volume (Retained)
Volume (Unrouted)
Error (Mass Balance)

0.000 ft3
707,994.000 ft3

0.000 ft3
707,977.000 ft3

16.000 ft3
-2.000 ft3

0.0 °A)
Fairway Canyon_v2.ppc
8/26/2024
Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution PondPack CONNECT Edition Center [10.02.00.01]
27 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Page 50 of 55
Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666

Page 672 of 1299 ends

Fairway Canyon 4C 2yr Proposed Conditions
Subsection: Pond Inflow Summary Scenario: Scenario - 2yr 24hr Label: Basin 1 (IN)
Summary for Hydrograph Addition at 'Basin 1'
Upstream Link Upstream Node
DA -D/5
DMA B and C
Node Inflows
Inflow Type Element Volume Time to Peak Flow (Peak)
(ft3) (min) (ft3/s)
Flow (From) DA -D/5 360,360.000 810.000 13.25000
Flow (From) DMA B and C 345,972.000 810.000 12.46000
Flow (In) Basin 1 707,994.180 810.000 25.71000
Fairway Canyon_v2.ppc
8/26/2024
Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution PondPack CONNECT Edition Center [10.02.00.01]
27 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Page 51 of 55
Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666

Page 673 of 1299 ends

Fairway Canyon 4C 2yr Proposed Conditions
Subsection: Elevation -Volume -Flow Table (Pond) Scenario: Scenario - 2yr 24hr Label: Basin 2
Infiltration
Infiltration Method
(Computed)
No Infiltration
Initial Conditions
Elevation (Water Surface,
Initial)
Volume (Initial)
Flow (Initial Outlet)
Flow (Initial Infiltration)
Flow (Initial, Total)
Time Increment
2,281.50 ft

0.000 ft3

0.00000 ft3/s

3.000 min
Elevation
(ft)
Outflow
(ft3/s)
Storage
(ft3)
Area
(ft2)
Infiltration
(ft3/s)
Flow (Total)
(ft3/s)
2S/t + 0
(ft3/s)
2,281.50

0.00000

0.000
10,972

0.00000

0.00000
2,282.00

0.47252
5,486.000
10,972

0.00000

0.47252

61.42807
2,282.50

0.81843
10,965.064
9,600

0.00000

0.81843
122.65247
2,283.00

1.05658
15,765.064
9,600

0.00000

1.05658
176.22396
2,283.50

1.25017
20,565.064
9,600

0.00000

1.25017
229.75087
2,284.00

1.41756
25,446.584
27,429

0.00000

1.41756
284.15738
2,284.50

1.56717
42,167.435
39,839

0.00000

1.56717
470.09422
2,285.00

1.70369
65,670.786
54,559

0.00000

1.70369
731.37909
2,285.50

1.83006
93,325.011
56,061

0.00000

1.83006
1,038.77462
2,286.00

1.94824
121,735.485
57,584

0.00000

1.94824
1,354.56475
2,286.50

2.05966
150,841.469
58,842

0.00000

2.05966
1,678.07598
2,286.73

2.10894
164,442.204
59,426

0.00000

2.10894
1,829.24454
2,287.00

2.30342
180,579.953
60,114

0.00000

2.30342
2,008.74734
2,287.50

2.75796
210,948.934
61,364

0.00000

2.75796
2,346.63500
2,288.00

3.03880
241,946.165
62,627

0.00000

3.03880
2,691.32952
2,288.50

9.93973
273,569.879
63,870

0.00000

9.93973
3,049.60505
2,289.00

18.60749
305,818.094
65,125

0.00000

18.60749
3,416.58631
2,289.50

22.20012
338,688.786
66,360

0.00000

22.20012
3,785.40885
2,290.00

25.24648
372,179.729
67,606

0.00000

25.24648
4,160.57680
2,290.50

27.94175
406,288.891
68,832

0.00000

27.94175
4,542.26277
2,291.00

30.38647
441,014.054
70,070

0.00000

30.38647
4,930.54263
2,291.50

32.64058
476,360.593
71,318

0.00000

32.64058
5,325.53606
2,292.00

34.74327
512,333.882
72,577

0.00000

34.74327
5,727.34195
Fairway Canyon_v2.ppc
8/26/2024
Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution PondPack CONNECT Edition Center [10.02.00.01]
27 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Page 52 of 55
Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666

Page 674 of 1299 ends

Fairway Canyon 4C 2yr Proposed Conditions
Subsection: Level Pool Pond Routing Summary Scenario: Scenario - 2yr 24hr Label: Basin 2 (IN)
Infiltration
Infiltration Method
(Computed)
No Infiltration
Initial Conditions
Elevation (Water Surface,
Initial)
Volume (Initial)
Flow (Initial Outlet)
Flow (Initial Infiltration)
Flow (Initial, Total)
Time Increment
2,281.50 ft

0.000 ft3

0.00000 ft3/s

3.000 min
Inflow/Outflow Hydrograph Summary
Flow (Peak In)
Flow (Peak Outlet)

9.68400 ft3/s

2.23669 ft3/s
Time to Peak (Flow, In)
Time to Peak (Flow, Outlet)
816.000 min
1,017.000 min
Elevation (Water Surface,
Peak)
Volume (Peak)
2,286.91 ft
175,021.797 ft3
Mass Balance (ft3)
Volume (Initial)
Volume (Total Inflow)
Volume (Total Infiltration)
Volume (Total Outlet
Outflow)
Volume (Retained)
Volume (Unrouted)
Error (Mass Balance)

0.000 ft3
284,591.000 ft3

0.000 ft3
284,586.000 ft3

5.000 ft3

0.000 ft3

Page 675 of 1299 ends

Fairway Canyon 4C 2yr Proposed Conditions
Subsection: Pond Inflow Summary Scenario: Scenario - 2yr 24hr Label: Basin 2 (IN)
Summary for Hydrograph Addition at 'Basin 2'
Upstream Link Upstream Node
DMA A (North)
Node Inflows
Inflow Type
Flow (From)
Flow (In)
Element
DMA A (North)
Basin 2
Fairway Canyon_v2.ppc
8/26/2024
Volume Time to Peak Flow (Peak)
(ft3) (min) (ft3/s)
284,590.500 815.000 9.70000
284,591.160 816.000 9.68400
Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution PondPack CONNECT Edition Center [10.02.00.01]
27 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Page 54 of 55
Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666

Page 676 of 1299 ends

Fairway Canyon 4C 2yr Proposed Conditions
Index
B
Basin 1 (Elevation -Volume -Flow Table (Pond))...

Basin 1 (IN) (Level Pool Pond Routing Summary)...

Basin 1 (IN) (Pond Inflow Summary)...

Basin 1 (OUT) (Time vs. Elevation)...

Basin 1 (Time vs. Volume)...

Basin 2 (Elevation -Volume -Flow Table (Pond))...

Basin 2 (IN) (Level Pool Pond Routing Summary)...

Basin 2 (IN) (Pond Inflow Summary)...

Basin 2 (OUT) (Time vs. Elevation)...

Basin 2 (Time vs. Volume)...

D
DA -D/5 (Read Hydrograph)...

DMA A (North) (Read Hydrograph)...

DMA B and C (Read Hydrograph)...

M
Master Network Summary...3
0 Outlet Basinl (Outlet Input Data)...

Outlet Basin2 (Outlet Input Data)...

Outlet Input Data...42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47
U
User Notifications...2
Fairway Canyon_v2.ppc
8/26/2024
Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution PondPack CONNECT Edition Center [10.02.00.01]
27 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Page 55 of 55
Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666

Page 677 of 1299 ends

Appendix 8: Source Control
Pollutant Sources/Source Control Checklist
- 33 -

Page 678 of 1299 ends

STORMWATER POLLUTANT SOURCES/SOURCE CONTROL CHECKLIST
How to use this worksheet (also see instructions in Section G of the WQMP Template):

1. Review Column 1 and identify which of these potential sources of stormwater pollutants apply to your site. Check each box that applies.

2. Review Column 2 and incorporate all of the corresponding applicable BMPs in your WQMP Exhibit.

3. Review Columns 3 and 4 and incorporate all of the corresponding applicable permanent controls and operational BMPs in your WQMP. Use the format shown in Table G.1 on page 23 of this WQMP Template. Describe your specific BMPs in an accompanying narrative, and explain any special conditions or situations that required omitting BMPs or substituting alternative BMPs for those shown here.

Drain" or similar. gip
Provide stormwater pollution
information to new site
prevention
owners, lessees, or operators.
iSee
applicable operational BMPs in
Fact Sheet SC -44, "Drainage System
Maintenance," in the CASQA
Stormwater Quality Handbooks at
www.cabmphandbooks.com
iInclude
the following in lease
"Tenant
agreements: shall not allow
anyone to discharge anything to storm
drains or to store or deposit materials
so as to create a potential discharge to
storm drains."
Cl B. Interior floor drains
and elevator shaft sump
pumps
❑ State that interior floor drains and
elevator shaft sump pumps will be
plumbed to sanitary sewer.
tit Inspect and maintain drains to prevent
blockages and overflow.
❑ C. Interior parking
garages
❑ State that parking garage floor
drains will be plumbed to the
sanitary sewer.
❑ Inspect and maintain drains to prevent
blockages and overflow.

Page 679 of 1299 ends

STORMWATER POLLUTANT SOURCES/SOURCE CONTROL CHECKLIST

P
D2. Landscape/
Outdoor Pesticide Use
0 Show locations of native trees or
to
State that final landscape plans will
accomplish all of the following.
if
Maintain landscaping using minimum
areas of shrubs and ground cover
be undisturbed and retained.

St Show self -retaining landscape
areas, if any.

VShow stormwater treatment and
hydrograph modification
management BMPs. (See
instructions in Chapter 3, Step 5
and guidance in Chapter 5.)
or no pesticides.
0 Preserve existing native trees,
shrubs, and cover to the
it
See applicable operational BMPs in
"What should know
ground
maximum extent possible.
you
for.....Landscape and Gardening" at
http://rcflood.org/stormwater/Error !
Hyperlink reference not valid.

Provide IPM information to new
C]/
,/
Design landscaping to minimize
irrigation and runoff, to promote
u
surface infiltration where
appropriate, and to minimize the
use of fertilizers and pesticides that
can contribute to stormwater
pollution.

Where landscaped areas are used to
retain or detain stormwater, specify
that are tolerant of saturated
if
owners, lessees and operators.
fir
plants
soil conditions.

Consider using pest -resistant
gir
plants, especially adjacent to
hardscape.

To insure successful establishment,
select plants appropriate to site
soils, slopes, climate, sun, wind,
rain, land use, air movement,
ecological consistency, and plant
interactions.

Page 680 of 1299 ends

STORMWATER POLLUTANT SOURCES/SOURCE CONTROL CHECKLIST

IF THESE SOURCES WILL BE
ON THE PROJECT SITE ...
... THEN YOUR WQMP SHOULD INCLUDE THESE SOURCE CONTROL BMPs, AS APPLICABLE 1 Potential Sources of
Runoff Pollutants
2 Permanent Controls —Show on
WQMP Drawings
3 Permanent Controls —List in WQMP
Table and Narrative
4 Operational BMPs—Include in WQMP
Table and Narrative
Cl E. Pools, spas, ponds,
decorative fountains,
and other water
features.
❑ Show location of water feature and
a sanitary sewer cleanout in an
accessible area within 10 feet.
(Exception: Public pools must be
plumbed according to County
Department of Environmental
Health Guidelines.)
If the Co-Permittee requires pools
to be plumbed to the sanitary
sewer, place a note on the plans
and state in the narrative that this
connection will be made according
to local requirements.
❑ See applicable operational BMPs in
"Guidelines for Maintaining Your
Swimming Pool, Jacuzzi and Garden
Fountain" at
http://rcflood.org/stormwater/
U F. Food service
❑ For restaurants, grocery stores, and
other food service operations, show
location (indoors or in a covered
area outdoors) of a floor sink or
other area for cleaning floor mats,
containers, and equipment.

U On the drawing, show a note that
this drain will be connected to a
grease interceptor before
discharging to the sanitary sewer.
❑ Describe the location and features
of the designated cleaning area.
❑ Describe the items to be cleaned in
this facility and how it has been
sized to insure that the largest
items can be accommodated.
❑ See the brochure, "The Food Service
Industry Best Management Practices for:

Restaurants, Grocery Stores,
Delicatessens and Bakeries" at
http://rcflood.org/stormwater/
Provide this brochure to new site
owners, lessees, and operators.
11 G. Refuse areas
1l Show where site refuse and
recycled materials will be handled
and stored for pickup. See local
municipal requirements for sizes
and other details of refuse areas.
ii If dumpsters or other receptacles
are outdoors, show how the
designated area will be covered,
graded, and paved to prevent run-
on and show locations of berms to
prevent runoff from the area.
❑ Any drains from dumpsters,
compactors, and tallow bin areas
shall be connected to a grease
removal device before discharge to
sanitary sewer.
d State how site refuse will be
handled and provide supporting
detail to what is shown on plans.
'' State that signs will be posted on or
near dumpsters with the words "Do
not dump hazardous materials
here" or similar.
ilf State how the following will be
implemented:

Provide adequate number of
receptacles. Inspect receptacles
regularly; repair or replace leaky
receptacles. Keep receptacles covered.

Prohibit/prevent dumping of liquid or
hazardous wastes. Post "no hazardous
materials" signs. Inspect and pick up
litter daily and clean up spills
immediately. Keep spill control
materials available on -site. See Fact
Sheet SC -34, "Waste Handling and
Disposal" in the CASQA Stormwater
Quality Handbooks at
www.cabmphandbooks.com

Page 681 of 1299 ends

STORMWATER POLLUTANT SOURCES/SOURCE CONTROL CHECKLIST

No processes to drain to exterior or
to storm drain system."
Handbooks at
www.cabmphandbooks.com
See the brochure "Industrial &
Commercial Facilities Best Management
Practices for: Industrial, Commercial
Facilities" at
http://rcflood.org/stormwater/

Page 682 of 1299 ends

STORMWATER POLLUTANT SOURCES/SOURCE CONTROL CHECKLIST

IF THESE SOURCES WILL BE
ON THE PROJECT SITE ...
... THEN YOUR WQMP SHOULD INCLUDE THESE SOURCE CONTROL BMPs, AS APPLICABLE 1 Potential Sources of
Runoff Pollutants
2 Permanent Controls —Show on
WQMP Drawings
3 Permanent Controls —List in WQMP
Table and Narrative
4 Operational BMPs—Include in WQMP
Table and Narrative
❑ I. Outdoor storage of
equipment or materials.
(See rows J and K for
source control
measures for vehicle
cleaning, repair, and
maintenance.)
❑ Show any outdoor storage areas,
including how materials will be
covered. Show how areas will be
graded and bermed to prevent run-
on or run-off from area.
❑ Storage of non -hazardous liquids
shall be covered by a roof and/or
drain to the sanitary sewer system,
and be contained by berms, dikes,
liners, or vaults.
❑ Storage of hazardous materials and
wastes must be in compliance with
the local hazardous materials
ordinance and a Hazardous
Materials Management Plan for the
site.

Include a detailed description of
materials to be stored, storage
areas, and structural features to
prevent pollutants from entering
storm drains.

Where appropriate, reference
documentation of compliance with
the requirements of Hazardous
Materials Programs for:
■ Hazardous Waste Generation
• Hazardous Materials Release
Response and Inventory
• California Accidental Release
(Ca1ARP)
■ Aboveground Storage Tank
• Uniform Fire Code Article 80
Section 103(b) & (c) 1991
• Underground Storage Tank
www.cchealth.org/groups/hazmat
❑ See the Fact Sheets SC -31, "Outdoor
Liquid Container Storage" and SC -33,
"Outdoor Storage of Raw Materials "
in the CASQA Stormwater Quality
Handbooks at
�ww•cabmphandbooks.com
1

Page 683 of 1299 ends

STORMWATER POLLUTANT SOURCES/SOURCE CONTROL CHECKLIST

Sources of Runoff Pollutants categories
below. Brochure can be found at
http://rcflood.org/stormwater/
Car dealerships and similar may
rinse cars with water only.
(3) Washing areas for cars, vehicles,
and equipment shall be paved,
designed to prevent run-on to or
runoff from the area, and plumbed
to drain to the sanitary sewer.
(4) Commercial car wash facilities
shall be designed such that no
runoff from the facility is
discharged to the storm drain
system. Wastewater from the
facility shall discharge to the
sanitary sewer, or a wastewater
reclamation system shall be
installed.

Page 684 of 1299 ends

STORMWATER POLLUTANT SOURCES/SOURCE CONTROL CHECKLIST

IF THESE SOURCES WILL BE
ON THE PROJECT SITE ...
... THEN YOUR WQMP SHOULD INCLUDE THESE SOURCE CONTROL BMPs, AS APPLICABLE 1 2
3 4
Potential Sources of
Permanent Controls —Show on
Permanent Controls —List in WQMP
Operational BMPs—Include in WQMP
Runoff Pollutants
WQMP Drawings
Table and Narrative
Table and Narrative
K. Vehicle/Equipment
❑ Accommodate all vehicle
❑ State that no vehicle repair or
In the Stormwater Control Plan, note
Cl
Repair and
Maintenance
equipment repair and maintenance
indoors. Or designate an outdoor
maintenance will be done outdoors,
or else describe the required
that all of the following restrictions
apply to use the site:
work area and design the area to
prevent run-on and runoff of
stormwater.
features of the outdoor work area.
❑ State that there are no floor drains
or if there are floor drains, note the
❑ No person shall dispose of, nor permit
the disposal, directly or indirectly of
vehicle fluids, hazardous materials, or
❑
Show secondary containment for
exterior work areas where motor
oil, brake fluid, gasoline, diesel
fuel, radiator fluid, acid -containing
batteries or other hazardous
materials or hazardous wastes are
used or stored. Drains shall not be
installed within the secondary
containment areas.
agency from which an industrial
waste discharge permit will be
obtained and that the design meets
that agency's requirements.
❑ State that there are no tanks,
containers or sinks to be used for
parts cleaning or rinsing or, if there
are, note the agency from which an
industrial waste discharge permit
rinsewater from parts cleaning into
storm drains.
❑ No vehicle fluid removal shall be
performed outside a building, nor on
asphalt or ground surfaces, whether
inside or outside a building, except in
such a manner as to ensure that any
spilled fluid will be in an area of
secondary containment. Leaking
❑
Add a note on the plans that states
either (1) there are no floor drains,
or (2) floor drains are connected to
wastewater pretreatment systems
prior to discharge to the sanitary
sewer and an industrial waste
discharge permit will be obtained.
will be obtained and that the
design meets that agency's
requirements.
vehicle fluids shall be contained or
drained from the vehicle immediately.

No person shall leave unattended drip
❑ parts or other open containers
containing vehicle fluid, unless such
containers are in use or in an area of
secondary containment.

Refer to "Automotive Maintenance & Car
Care Best Management Practices for Auto
Body Shops, Auto Repair Shops, Car
Dealerships, Gas Stations and Fleet
Service Operations". Brochure can be
found at http://rcflood.org/stormwater/
Refer to Outdoor Cleaning Activities and
Professional Mobile Service Providers for
many of the Potential Sources of
Runoff Pollutants categories below.

Brochure can be found at
http://rcflood.org/stormwater/

Page 685 of 1299 ends

STORMWATER POLLUTANT SOURCES/SOURCE CONTROL CHECKLIST

Page 686 of 1299 ends

STORMWATER POLLUTANT SOURCES/SOURCE CONTROL CHECKLIST

Page 687 of 1299 ends

STORMWATER POLLUTANT SOURCES/SOURCE CONTROL CHECKLIST

0. Miscellaneous Drain
or Wash Water or Other
Sources
❑ Boiler drain lines
❑ Condensate drain lines
❑ Rooftop equipment
C Drainage sumps
Roofing, gutters, and
trim.
❑ Other sources
U Boiler drain lines shall be directly
or indirectly connected to the
sanitary sewer system and may not
discharge to the storm drain
❑ system.

Condensate drain lines may
discharge to landscaped areas if the
flow is small enough that runoff
will not occur. Condensate drain
lines may not discharge to the
❑ storm drain system.

Rooftop equipment with potential
to produce pollutants shall be
❑ roofed and/or have secondary
containment.

Any drainage sumps on -site shall
dfeature a sediment sump to reduce
the quantity of sediment in
pumped water.
st Avoid roofing, gutters, and trim
made of copper or other
unprotected metals that may leach
into runoff.

Include controls for other sources
as specified by local reviewer.

Page 688 of 1299 ends

STORMWATER POLLUTANT SOURCES/SOURCE CONTROL CHECKLIST

Plazas, sidewalks,
and lots.
if
Sweep plazas, sidewalks, and parking
lots regularly to accumulation
parking
prevent
of litter and debris. Collect debris from
pressure washing to prevent entry into
the storm drain system. Collect
washwater containing any cleaning
agent or degreaser and discharge to
the sanitary sewer not to a storm drain.

Page 689 of 1299 ends

Appendix 9: O&M
Operation and Maintenance Plan and Documentation of Finance, Maintenance and Recording Mechanisms - 34 -

Page 690 of 1299 ends

Recording requested by and mail to:

City Clerk
City of Beaumont
550 E. Sixth Street
Beaumont, CA 92223

SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE
EXEMPT FROM RECORDER'S FEES PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 6103 AND 27383 APN:

STORM WATER MANAGEMENT WQMP/BMP FACILITIES
COVENANT AND AGREEMENT NO.

City of Beaumont, Riverside County, California
THIS COVENANT AND AGREEMENT is made and entered into this of 20 , by and between , ("Owner"), and the City of Beaumont, California, ("City").

The Owner hereby certifies 1 am (we are) the sole owner of certain real property located at (Site Address) in the City of Beaumont, County of Riverside, State of California, more specifically described in Exhibit "A" and depicted in Exhibit "B" ("Property").

The Owner covenants and agrees to comply with the Project Water Quality Management Plan ("WQMP"), attached hereto as Exhibit "C", providing for storm water quality treatment within the confines of the Property.

The Owner covenants and agrees that the health, safety and welfare of the residents of the City of Beaumont, require that the Best Management Practice ("BMP") facilities, more specifically described in the WQMP ( for example bio- swales, catch basins, roof drains and appurtenances) be constructed and maintained to minimize pollutants in urban runoff by the Owner.

The Owner further covenants and agrees as follows:

I. The on -site storm water management/BMP facilities mentioned above shall be constructed by the Owner at its sole cost and expense, in accordance with the plans and specifications identified in the WQMP approved by City.

2. The Owner shall adequately maintain the storm water management/BMP facilities in a manner assuring peak performance at all times, including source control BMPs at all times as its sole responsibility, at its sole cost and expense. This includes all pipes and channels built to convey storm water on the Property, including catch basin inserts, underground detention ponds, swales and vegetation provided to control the quantity and quality of the 1

Page 691 of 1299 ends

storm water. Adequate maintenance is herein defined as good working con dition so that these facilities are performing in accordance with their design functions continuously at all times.

3. The Owner shall annually inspect the storm water management/BMP facilities mentioned above and submit an inspection report annually to the Public Works Department by the anniversary of the date of this Agreement of each year. The purpose of the inspection is to assure safe and proper functioning of the facilities. The inspection shall cover the sto rm water management BMPs listed in the WQMP such as bioswales, catch basins and related filter units, etc. Deficiencies shall be noted in the inspection report and corrected by Owner promptly.

4. The O wner hereby grants permission to City, its authorized agents and employees, to e nter upon the Property and to inspect the storm water management/BMP facilities, take samples and perform testing whenever the City deems necessary and as required by the City's most current National Pollutant Discharge Eliminati on System ( NPDES) Permit. The purpose of the inspection, testing and sampling is to follow up on apparent and rep orted deficiencies and/or to respond to citizen complaints and meet the requirements of the City's NPDES Permit issued by the State Water Reso urces Contro l Bo ard — Santa Ana River Region. The City shall provide the Owner with advanced n otice of entering upon the Property, ex cept in the event of an emergency, as determined by the City. The City shall provide the O wner copies of the inspection findings and a directive to commence with the repairs if necessary.

Owner or Owner's successors or assigns shall pay City for all costs incurred by City in the inspection, sampling, testing of the BMPs within thirty (30) calendar days of City invoice.

5. In the event the Owner fails to maintain the storm water management/BMP facilities in g ood w orking condition rn acceptable to the City, u pon five (5) days advanced written notice, the City may enter up on the Property a nd take N whatever steps necessary to co rrect deficiencies identified in a ny inspection report and to charge the costs of such o repairs to the Owner the co st of which shall constitute a lien agai nst the Property . In the event of an emergency, as al determined by City, advanced n otice as aforesaid, shall not be req uired. Notwithstanding the forgoing, it is expressly u nderstood and agreed that the City is under no obligation to maintain or repair said facilities, and in no ev ent shall this Agreement be construed to imp ose any such obligation to the City. o_

6. The O wner will perform the work necessary to keep these facilities in good working order as appropriate. The maintenance schedule for the storm water management BMP facilities (including sediment removal) is outlined in the approved WQMP and the schedule must be followed at all times. In the future, City of Bea umont may adopt an annual Stormwater Inspection Fee that would be assessed to the Owner .

7. In the event the City, pursuant to this Agreement, performs work of any nature, or expends any funds in performance of said work for labor, use of equipment, supplies, materials and the like, the Owner, its successors and assigns shall reimburse the City upon demand, within thirty (30) days of receipt thereof for all actual costs i ncurred by the City hereunder.

8. This Agreement imp oses no liability of any kind whatsoever on the City. Owner agrees to indemnify, defend (with counsel reasonably appro ved by the City) and hold harmless the City and its authorized officers,

9. employees, agents a nd volu nteers from any and all claims, actions, losses, damages, and/or liability arising out of this Agreement fr om any cause whatsoever, including the acts, errors or omissions of any person and for any c osts or expenses i ncurred by the City on account of any claim e xcept where such indemnification is prohibited by law. This indem nification provision shall apply regardless of the e xiste nce or degree of fa ult of indemnitees . The Owner's i ndem nification obligation applies to the City's "active" as well as "passive" negligence but does not apply to the City's "s ole negligence" or "willful misconduct" within the meaning of Civil Code Section 2 2782, or to any claims, actions, losses, damages, and/or liabilities, to the extent caused by the acts or omissions of any third party co ntractors u ndertaking any work (other than field inspections) or other maintenance on the Property on behalf of the City un der this Agreement.

10. This Agreement shall be recorded with the County Recorder for the County of Riverside and shall constitute a cov en ant running with the land, equitable servitude and lien against the Property, and shall be binding on the Owner, its successors, assigns, transferees, administrators, ex ecuto rs, heirs, encumbrancers and any other su ccesso rs in interests, including any homeowner's association.

11. In addition to any remedy available to City under this Agreement, if Owner violates any term of this Agreement and does not cure the violation within the time already prov ided in this Agreement, or, if not provided, within thirty (30) calendar days, or within such time au tho riz ed by the City if said cure reasonably requires m ore than the subject time, the City may bring an action at law or in equ ity in a court of competent jurisdiction to enforce compliance by the Owner with the terms of this Agreement. In such action, the City may recover any damages to which the City may be entitled for the violation, enjo in the violation by temporary or permanent injunction without the necessity of proving actual damages or the in adequacy of otherwise a vailable legal remedies, or obtain other equitable relief, including, but not limited to , the restoration of the Property and/or the BMPs identified in the WQMP to the condition in which it/they existed prior to any s uch vi olatio n or injury .

12. Owner shall prov ide printed educa tional materials with any sale of the Property which pr ovide information on what storm water management facilities are present, the types and locations of maintenance signs that are required and o, how the necessary maintenance can be maintained. N
I3. Owner shall pro vide actua l notice of this Agreement and its terms to any respecti ve buyers or successor(s) in interest.

14. In order to be valid, amendment or change to this Agreement including the WQMP and BMPs requires an amendment ex ecuted by the City and Owner which is recorded with the Riverside County Recorder.

WITN ESS the followi ng signatures:

OWNER:

By:

Name:

Title:
�"It -E iii c C
Pr -7e 5- tA4-4,-
Organization: Re Q ✓ d rky �JVn e S
By:

Name:

Title:

Organization:

All signatures on this Agreement on behalf of the Owner m ust be ack nowledged before a Notary Public. In the e vent that the owner is a c orporati on, the President/Vice President and the c orporate secretary of the corporation must sign. 3 City:

CITY OF BEAUMONT
a Municipal Corporation
Signature:

City Manager
A TTEST:

Signature:

City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Signature:

Jo hn Pinkn ey, City Attorney
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:

Page 694 of 1299 ends

Signature:

Robert Vestal, Director of Engineering/Public Works
4 A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accu racy, or va lidity of that docu ment.

State of•Ga.lifvrrita TXP
County of41-iveit#tiegOit
�n ' i454-�`� , 20 ,before me, 014V1 YU Mt 1 LQili , notary p ublic, personally appeared (,�flOtivOtWVho proved to me on the basis o satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose names) is/are subscribed to the within instrumen t and ackno wledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authoriz ed capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the perso n(s) acted, executed the instrument.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the f oreg oing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.

Signature
ailirwarilbialmilirdlimiaiddballwillr f P t RAYANNE NICOLE MILLER i1 , Notary IR #132944616(Seal s�W 4.1, My Commission Expires ► i "4OF February 26, 2025 M
A notary public or other officer completing this certific ate verifies o nly the ide ntity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.

State of California
County of Riverside
On , 20 , before me, , n otary p ublic, personally appeared who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are s ubscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they e xecuted the same in his/her/their authori zed capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, e xecuted the instrument . 1 certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foreg oing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.

Signature: (Seal)

Page 695 of 1299 ends

5 A no tary public or o ther officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that documen t.

State of Califo rnia
Cou nty of Riverside
)
)
On , 20 , before me, , notary public, personally appeared who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they e xecuted the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.

Signature. (Seal)
A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that doc ument .

State of California
County of Riverside
)
)
On , 20 , before me, , notary public, personally appeared wh o pr oved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, e xec uted the instrument.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal .

Signature: (Seal)

Page 696 of 1299 ends

6 EXHIBIT "A"

LEGAL DESCRIPTION

Page 697 of 1299 ends

7 PRELIMINARY REPORT Chicago Title Company
YOUR REFERENCE: ORDER NO.: 00207854-RT4
EXHIBIT "A"

LEGAL DESCRIPTION

THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN BELOW IS SITUATED IN THE CITY OF BEAUMONT, IN THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

TRACT NO. 31462-17, BEING A DIVISION OF PARCEL 2 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 38953, IN THE CITY OF

BEAUMONT, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, RECORDED IN BOOK , PAGES THROUGH INCLUSIVE OF PARCEL MAPS, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY.

EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE ABOVE PARCEL ANY AND ALL NATURAL OIL, OIL RIGHTS,

MINERALS, MINERAL RIGHTS, NATURAL GAS, NATURAL GAS RIGHTS AND OTHER

HYDROCARBONS BY WHATSOEVER NAME KNOWN AND ALL RIGHTS THEREIN, GEOTHERMAL STEAM,

AND ALL PRODUCTS DERIVED FROM ANY OF THE FOREGOING, THAT MAY BE WITHIN OR UNDER THE

LAND, TOGETHER WITH THE PERPETUAL RIGHT OF DRILLING, MINING, EXPLORING AND

OPERATING THEREFOR AND STORING IN AND REMOVING THE SAME FROM THE LAND OR ANY

OTHER PROPERTY, INCLUDING THE RIGHT TO WHIPSTOCK OR DIRECTIONALLY DRILL AND

MINE FROM PROPERTY OTHER THAN THE LAND, OIL OR GAS WELLS, TUNNELS AND SHAFTS INTO,

THROUGH OR ACROSS THE SUBSURFACE OF THE LAND, AND TO BOTTOM SUCH WHIPSTOCKED OR

DIRECTIONALLY DRILLED WELLS, TUNNELS AND SHAFTS UNDER AND BENEATH OR BEYOND THE

EXTERIOR LIMITS THEREOF, AND TO REDRILL, RETUNNEL, EQUIP, MAINTAIN, REPAIR, DEEPEN AND

OPERATE ANY SUCH WELLS, TUNNELS OR SHAFTS, WITHOUT THE RIGHT TO DRILL, MINE, STORE OR EXCAVATE THROUGH THE SURFACE OR THE UPPER 500 FEET OF THE SUBSURFACE OR THE LAND AS RESERVED BY OAK VALLEY PARTNERS, L.P., A TEXAS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP WHICH IS REGISTERED IN CALIFORNIA AS OVP, L.P., IN A GRANT DEED RECORDED NOVEMBER 14, 2003 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2003-899365 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.

ANY AND ALL WATER, WATER RIGHTS OR INTERESTS THEREIN APPURTENANT OR RELATING TO THE

LAND OR OWNED OR USED BY GRANTOR IN CONNECTION WITH OR WITH RESPECT TO THE LAND (NO

MATTER HOW ACQUIRED BY GRANTOR), WHETHER SUCH WATER RIGHTS SHALL BE RIPARIAN,

OVERLYING, APPROPRIATIVE, LITTORAL, PERCOLATING, PRESCRIPTIVE, ADJUDICATED,

STATUTORY OR CONTRACTUAL, TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT AND POWER TO EXPLORE, DRILL,

REMOVE AND RESTORE THE SAME FROM OR IN THE LAND OR TO DIVERT OR OTHERWISE UTILIZE

SUCH WATER, RIGHTS OR INTERESTS ON ANY OTHER PROPERTY OWNED BY OR LEASED BY

GRANTOR, WITHOUT THE RIGHT TO ENTER UPON THE SURFACE OF THE LAND IN THE EXERCISE OF SUCH RIGHTS; PROVIDED, HOWEVER, ONLY IF AND TO THE EXTENT THAT SUCH RIGHTS ARE NOT

USED BY GRANTEE IN ITS USE AND ENJOYMENT OF THE LAND AS RESERVED BY OAK VALLEY PARTNERS, L.P., A TEXAS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, WHICH IS REGISTERED IN CALIFORNIA AS OVP, L.P., IN A GRANT DEED RECORDED NOVEMBER 14, 2003 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2003-899365 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.

PORTION OF APN: 413-790-074
CLTA Preliminary Report Form — Modified (11/17/06)

Page 698 of 1299 ends

Page 4 ends

EXHIBIT "B"

DIAGRAM OF PROPERTY

Page 699 of 1299 ends

8 NORTH
66Z I- 10 OOL abed

VICINITY MAP

NOT TO SCALE

CHAMPIONS DRIVE

CHERRY VALLEY BL

OAK VALLEY PARKWAY

Page 701 of 1299 ends

//
11 LEGEND
PROP. CONTOUR

PROPERTY LINE
— DMA BOUNDARY
— — RIGHT-OF-WAY

DMA NAME

AREA (IN ACRES)

GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
0 20 0 800

MISIOXS
IGmley »Horn
146161011
OF

Page 702 of 1299 ends

BMP Inspection and Maintenance Plan
BMP
Responsible Party
Inspection/Maintenance Activities Required
Minimum Frequency of Activities
Parking Area
Maintenance
Owner
Parking lots and private streets must be swept.

Quarterly (minimum), weekly during
rainy season (oct-may)
Drainage System
Maintenance
Owner
Inspect, clean and maintain drainage facilities.

Prior to rainy season and after every rain
event greater than 0.5 inches.

Plaza and Sidewalk
Cleaning
Owner
Litter shall be picked up. Sidewalk and plaza areas shall be swept.

Weekly
Landscape
Maintenance
Owner
Vegetated Areas Mowing and/or trimming of vegetation must be performed on a regular schedule based on specific site conditions.

Vegetated areas must be inspected at least annually for erosion and scour.

Vegetated areas should also be inspected at least annually for unwanted growth, which should be removed with minimum disruption to the planting soil bed and remaining vegetation. When establishing or restoring vegetation, biweekly inspections of vegetation health should be performed during the first growing season or until the vegetation is established. Once established, inspections of vegetation health, density, and diversity should be performed at least twice annually during both the growing and non - growing seasons.

The vegetative cover should be maintained at 85 percent. If vegetation has greater than 50 percent damage, the area should be reestablished in accordance with the original specifications and the inspection requirements presented above.

All use of fertilizers, mechanical treatments, pesticides and other means to assure optimum vegetation health should not compromise the intended purpose of the bioretention system. All vegetation deficiencies should be addressed without the use of fertilizers and pesticides whenever possible.

Weekly

Page 703 of 1299 ends

BMP Inspection and Maintenance Plan
BMP
Responsible Party
Inspection/Maintenance Activities Required
Minimum Frequency of Activities
Efficient Irrigation
Owner
Irrigation systems must be inspected to ensure proper functionality. Timers must be inspected to avoid overwatering and water cycle and duration shall be adjusted seasonally by landscape maintenance contractor.

Weekly
Storm Drain Signage
Owner
Maintain legibility of stenciling and signs.

Yearly
Trash Storage Areas
Owner
Trash and waste storage areas must be inspected to ensure receptacles are not collecting storm water. Trash enclosure areas shall be swept and cleaned, dumpsters shall be emptied. Lids must always be maintained closed.

Weekly
Bioretention Basins
Owner
Keep adjacent landscape areas maintained. Remove clippings from landscape maintenance activities. Remove trash and debris. Replace damaged grass and/or plants. Replace surface mulch later as needed to maintain a 2-3 inch soil cover. Inspect areas for ponding after storm events.

Inspect/clean inlets and outlets annually.

Annually

Page 704 of 1299 ends

BMP Inspection and Maintenance Log
Date
Inspection/Maintenance Task Performed
Inspector

Page 705 of 1299 ends

BMP Inspection and Maintenance Log
Date
Inspection/Maintenance Task Performed
Inspector

Page 706 of 1299 ends

Stormwater BMP Inspection and Maintenance Log
Facility Name
Address
Begin Date
End Date
Date
BMP ID#
BMP Description
Inspected
by:

Cause for
Inspection
Exceptions Noted
Comments and
Actions Taken
Instructions: Record all inspections and maintenance for all treatment BMPs on this form. Use additional log sheets and/or attach extended comments or documentation as necessary. Submit a copy of the completed log with the annual independent inspectors' report to the municipality, and start a new log at that time.
• BMP ID# — Always use ID# from the Operation and Maintenance Manual. • Inspected by — Note all inspections and maintenance on this form, including the required independent annual inspection. • Cause for inspection — Note if the inspection is routine, pre -rainy -season, post -storm, annual, or in response to a noted problem or complaint. • Exceptions noted — Note any condition that requires correction or indicates a need for maintenance. • Comments and actions taken — Describe any maintenance done and need for follow-up.

Page 707 of 1299 ends

Appendix 10: Educational Materials
BMP Fact Sheets, Maintenance Guidelines and Other End -User BMP Information - 35 -

Page 708 of 1299 ends

3.5 Bioretention Facility
1 Type of BMP
LID — Bioretention
Treatment Mechanisms
Infiltration, Evapotranspiration, Evaporation, Biofiltration Maximum Drainage Area
This BMP is intended to be integrated into a project's landscaped area in a distributed manner. Typically, contributing drainage areas to Bioretention Facilities range from less than 1 acre to a maximum of around 10 acres.

Other Names
Rain Garden, Bioretention Cell, Bioretention Basin, Biofiltration Basin, Landscaped Filter Basin, Porous Landscape Detention
Description
Bioretention Facilities are shallow, vegetated basins underlain by an engineered soil media.

Healthy plant and biological activity in the root zone maintain and renew the macro -pore space in the soil and maximize plant uptake of pollutants and runoff. This keeps the Best Management Practice (BMP) from becoming clogged and allows more of the soil column to function as both a sponge (retaining water) and a highly effective and self -maintaining biofilter.

In most cases, the bottom of a Bioretention Facility is unlined, which also provides an opportunity for infiltration to the extent the underlying onsite soil can accommodate. When the infiltration rate of the underlying soil is exceeded, fully biotreated flows are discharged via underdrains. Bioretention Facilities therefore will inherently achieve the maximum feasible level of infiltration and evapotranspiration and achieve the minimum feasible (but highly biotreated) discharge to the storm drain system.

Siting Considerations
These facilities work best when they are designed in a relatively level area. Unlike other BMPs, Bioretention Facilities can be used in smaller landscaped spaces on the site, such as:
✓ Parking islands
✓ Medians
✓ Site entrances
Landscaped areas on the site (such as may otherwise be required through minimum landscaping ordinances), can often be designed as Bioretention Facilities. This can be accomplished by:
• Depressing landscaped areas below adjacent impervious surfaces, rather than elevating those areas
• Grading the site to direct runoff from those impervious surfaces into the Bioretention Facility, rather than away from the landscaping
• Sizing and designing the depressed landscaped area as a Bioretention Facility as described in this Fact Sheet
Riverside County - Low Impact Development BMP Design Handbook rev. 2/2012

Page 1 ends

Page 709 of 1299 ends

Bioretention Facilities should however not be used downstream of areas where large amounts of sediment can clog the system. Placing a Bioretention Facility at the toe of a steep slope should also be avoided due to the potential for clogging the engineered soil media with erosion from the slope, as well as the potential for damaging the vegetation.

Design and Sizing Criteria
The recommended cross section necessary for a Bioretention Facility includes:
• Vegetated area
• 18' minimum depth of engineered soil media
• 12' minimum gravel layer depth with 6' perforated pipes (added flow control features such as orifice plates may be required to mitigate for HCOC conditions) 5' MINIMUM TOP WIDTH
2' VARIES
(DEPTH X SIDE SLOPE)

SLOTTED CURS

GRAVEL PAD
PARKING OR DRIVE AISLE {TYP}
18" - 36"

ENGINEERED

SOIL MEDIA

PERFORATED PIPE --

RETAINING WALL TYPE IA PER
CALTRANS STANDARD B3.3 OR

ENGINEERED ALTERNATIVE BASED

ON GEOTECHNICAL PARAMETERS
2' MINIMUM
(DEPTH X SIDE SLOPE)

PONDING DEPTH
6" MAXIMUM

MATURE VEGETATION
- AND 2-3" MULCH LAYER

TIE SUBDRAIN INTO INLET
CALTRANS 073 T T PE G-1 OR

FUNCTIONAL EQUIVALENT

DROP INLET
PARKING OR DRIVE AISLE {TYP}
While the 18 -inch minimum engineered soil media depth can be used in some cases, it is recommended to use 24 inches or a preferred 36 inches to provide an adequate root zone for the chosen plant palate. Such a design also provides for improved removal effectiveness for nutrients. The recommended ponding depth inside of a Bioretention Facility is 6 inches; measured from the flat bottom surface to the top of the water surface as shown in Figure 1.

Because this BMP is filled with an engineered soil media, pore space in the soil and gravel layer is assumed to provide storage volume. However, several considerations must be noted:
• Surcharge storage above the soil surface (6 inches) is important to assure that design flows do not bypass the BMP when runoff exceeds the soil's absorption rate. • In cases where the Bioretention Facility contains engineered soil media deeper than 36 inches, the pore space within the engineered soil media can only be counted to the 36 - inch depth.
• A maximum of 30 percent pore space can be used for the soil media whereas a maximum of 40 percent pore space can be use for the gravel layer.

Riverside County - Low Impact Development BMP Design Handbook rev. 2/2012

Page 2 ends

Page 710 of 1299 ends

Figure 1: Standard Layout for a Bioretention Facility

BIORETENTION FACILITY BMP FACT SHEET
Engineered Soil Media Requirements
The engineered soil media shall be comprised of 85 percent mineral component and 15 percent organic component, by volume, drum mixed prior to placement. The mineral component shall be a Class A sandy loam topsoil that meets the range specified in Table 1 below. The organic component shall be nitrogen stabilized compost', such that nitrogen does not leach from the media.

Table 1: Mineral Component Range Requirements
Percent Range
Component
70-80
Sand
15-20
Silt
5-10
Clay
The trip ticket, or certificate of compliance, shall be made available to the inspector to prove the engineered mix meets this specification.

Vegetation Requirements
Vegetative cover is important to minimize erosion and ensure that treatment occurs in the Bioretention Facility. The area should be designed for at least 70 percent mature coverage throughout the Bioretention Facility. To prevent the BMP from being used as walkways, Bioretention Facilities shall be planted with a combination of small trees, densely planted shrubs, and natural grasses. Grasses shall be native or ornamental; preferably ones that do not need to be mowed. The application of fertilizers and pesticides should be minimal. To maintain oxygen levels for the vegetation and promote biodegradation, it is important that vegetation not be completely submerged for any extended period of time. Therefore, a maximum of 6 inches of ponded water shall be used in the design to ensure that plants within the Bioretention Facility remain healthy.

A 2 to 3 -inch layer of standard shredded aged hardwood mulch shall be placed as the top layer inside the Bioretention Facility. The 6 -inch ponding depth shown in Figure 1 above shall be measured from the top surface of the 2 to 3 -inch mulch layer.

Curb Cuts
To allow water to flow into the Bioretention Facility, 1 -foot -wide (minimum) curb cuts should be placed approximately every 10 feet around the perimeter of the Bioretention Facility. Figure 2 shows a curb cut in a Bioretention Facility. Curb cut flow lines must be at or above the VBMP water surface level.

For more information on compost, visit the US Composting Council website at: http://compostingcouncil.org/ Riverside County - Low Impact Development BMP Design Handbook rev. 2/2012

Page 3 ends

Page 711 of 1299 ends

BIORETENTION FACILITY BMP FACT SHEET
Figure 2: Curb Cut located in a Bioretention Facility
To reduce erosion, a gravel pad shall be placed
at each inlet point to the Bioretention Facility.

The gravel should be 1- to 1.5 -inch diameter in
size. The gravel should overlap the curb cut
opening a minimum of 6 inches. The gravel pad
inside the Bioretention Facility should be flush
with the finished surface at the curb cut and
extend to the bottom of the slope.

In addition, place an apron of stone or concrete,
a foot square or larger, inside each inlet to
prevent vegetation from growing up and
blocking the inlet. See Figure 3.

N
4i
1 Figure 3: Apron located in a Bioretention Facility
Terracing the Landscaped Filter Basin
It is recommended that Bioretention Facilities be level. In the event the facility site slopes and lacks proper design, water would fill the lowest point of the BMP and then discharge from the basin without being treated. To ensure that the water will be held within the Bioretention Facility on sloped sites, the BMP must be terraced with nonporous check dams to provide the required storage and treatment capacity.

The terraced version of this BMP shall be used on non -flat sites with no more than a 3 percent slope. The surcharge depth cannot exceed 0.5 feet, and side slopes shall not exceed 4:1. Table 2 below shows the spacing of the check dams, and slopes shall be rounded up (i.e., 2.5 percent slope shall use 10' spacing for check dams).

Table 2: Check Dam Spacing
6" Check Dam
Slope
Spacing
Spacing
1%
25'
2%
15'
3%
10' 1
Riverside County - Low Impact Development BMP Design Handbook rev. 2/2012

Page 4 ends

Page 712 of 1299 ends

BIORETENTION FACILITY BMP FACT SHEET
Roof Runoff
Roof downspouts may be directed towards Bioretention Facilities. However, the downspouts must discharge onto a concrete splash block to protect the Bioretention Facility from erosion.

Retaining Walls
It is recommended that Retaining Wall Type 1A, per Caltrans Standard B3-3 or equivalent, be constructed around the entire perimeter of the Bioretention Facility. This practice will protect the sides of the Bioretention Facility from collapsing during construction and maintenance or from high service loads adjacent to the BMP. Where such service loads would not exist adjacent to the BMP, an engineered alternative may be used if signed by a licensed civil engineer.

Side Slope Requirements
Bioretention Facilities Requiring Side Slopes
The design should assure that the Bioretention Facility does not present a tripping hazard.

Bioretention Facilities proposed near pedestrian areas, such as areas parallel to parking spaces or along a walkway, must have a gentle slope to the bottom of the facility. Side slopes inside of a Bioretention Facility shall be 4:1. A typical cross section for the Bioretention Facility is shown in Figure 1.

Bioretention Facilities Not Requiring Side Slopes
Where cars park perpendicular to the Bioretention Facility, side slopes are not required. A 6 - inch maximum drop may be used, and the Bioretention Facility must be planted with trees and shrubs to prevent pedestrian access. In this case, a curb is not placed around the Bioretention Facility,
but wheel stops shall be used to prevent vehicles from entering the Bioretention Facility, as shown in Figure 4.

VARIES

WHEELSTOP (AS NEEDED)
PARKING iTYPY
2MINIMUM

PONDING DEPTH
6" MAXIMUM

ENGINEERED
SOIL F.IEDIA
L
RETAINING 'f, ALL TYPE LA F'ER
CALTF:ANS `:TANDARD• F'-? OR
ENGI NEEDED ALT EP NAT'.'E BASED
ON •GEOTE•CHNI•:AL PARAF.IETERS

PERFORATED FIFE-
'MATURE VEGETATION
-.AND 2-3" MULCH LAYER

TIESUFDRAIN

INTO INLET
Riverside County - Low Impact Development BMP Design Handbook CALTRANS DT' = TYPE •G-1 OP FUNCTIONAL

EQUIVALENT DROP INLET
VHEELSTOP (AS NEEDED}
PARKING (TYP}
rev. 2/2012

Page 5 ends

Page 713 of 1299 ends

BIORETENTION FACILITY BMP FACT SHEET
Planter Boxes
Bioretention Facilities can also be placed above ground as planter boxes. Planter boxes must have a minimum width of 2 feet, a maximum surcharge depth of 6 inches, and no side slopes are necessary. Planter boxes must be constructed so as to ensure that the top surface of the engineered soil media will remain level. This option may be constructed of concrete, brick, stone or other stable materials that will not warp or bend. Chemically treated wood or galvanized steel, which has the ability to contaminate stormwater, should not be used. Planter boxes must be lined with an impermeable liner on all sides, including the bottom. Due to the impermeable liner, the inside bottom of the planter box shall be designed and constructed with a cross fall, directing treated flows within the subdrain layer toward the point where subdrain exits the planter box, and subdrains shall be oriented with drain holes oriented down. These provisions will help avoid excessive stagnant water within the gravel underdrain layer. Similar to the in -ground Bioretention Facility versions, this BMP benefits from healthy plants and biological activity in the root zone. Planter boxes should be planted with appropriately selected vegetation.

Figure 5: Planter Box
Source: LA Team Effort
Overflow
An overflow route is needed in the Bioretention Facility design to bypass stored runoff from storm events larger than VBMP or in the event of facility or subdrain clogging. Overflow systems must connect to an acceptable discharge point, such as a downstream conveyance system as shown in Figure 1 and Figure 4. The inlet to the overflow structure shall be elevated inside the Bioretention Facility to be flush with the ponding surface for the design capture volume (VBMP) as shown in Figure 4. This will allow the design capture volume to be fully treated by the Bioretention Facility, and for larger events to safely be conveyed to downstream systems. The overflow inlet shall not be located in the entrance of a Bioretention Facility, as shown in Figure

6. Riverside County - Low Impact Development BMP Design Handbook rev. 2/2012

Page 6 ends

Page 714 of 1299 ends

BIORETENTION FACILITY BMP FACT SHEET
Underdrain Gravel and Pipes
An underdrain gravel layer and pipes shall be provided in accordance with Appendix B — Underdrains.

Figure 6: Incorrect Placement of an Overflow Inlet.

Inspection and Maintenance Schedule
The Bioretention Facility area shall be inspected for erosion, dead vegetation, soggy soils, or standing water. The use of fertilizers and pesticides on the plants inside the Bioretention Facility should be minimized.

Schedul
Activity
Ongoing
• Keep adjacent landscape areas maintained. Remove clippings from landscape maintenance activities.
• Remove trash and debris
• Replace damaged grass and/or plants
• Replace surface mulch layer as needed to maintain a 2-3 inch soil cover.

After storm events • Inspect areas for ponding
Annually • Inspect/clean inlets and outlets
Riverside County - Low Impact Development BMP Design Handbook rev. 2/2012

Page 7 ends

Page 715 of 1299 ends

Bioretention Facility Design Procedure
1) Enter the area tributary, AT, to the Bioretention Facility. 2) Enter the Design Volume, VgMp, determined from Section 2.1 of this Handbook. 3) Select the type of design used. There are two types of Bioretention Facility designs: the standard design used for most project sites that include side slopes, and the modified design used when the BMP is located perpendicular to the parking spaces or with planter boxes that do not use side slopes.
4) Enter the depth of the engineered soil media, ds. The minimum depth for the engineered soil media can be 18' in limited cases, but it is recommended to use 24' or a preferred 36' to provide an adequate root zone for the chosen plant palette. Engineered soil media deeper than 36' will only get credit for the pore space in the first 36'. 5) Enter the top width of the Bioretention Facility.
dE (ft) =
6) Calculate the total effective depth, dE, within the Bioretention Facility. The maximum allowable pore space of the soil media is 30% while the maximum allowable pore space for the gravel layer is 40%. Gravel layer deeper than 12' will only get credit for the pore space in the first 12'.
5v,1
T
4dE
ViAt
5,••:' T - U 4d p
id,
• Engineered soil media with 34% pore space•:
f-
a. For the design with side slopes the following equation shall be used to determine the total effective depth. Where, dp is the depth of ponding within the basin.

0.3 x [(wT(ft) x ds(ft)) + 4(dp(ft))21 + 0.4 x 1(ft) + dp(ft)[4dp(ft) + (wT(ft) — 8dp(ft))] wT (ft)
This above equation can be simplified if the maximum ponding depth of 0.5' is used. The equation below is used on the worksheet to find the minimum area required for the Bioretention Facility:
dE (ft) = (0.3 x ds(ft) + 0.4 x 1(ft))

0.7 (ft2)
+ 0.5(ft)
WT (ft)
Riverside County - Low Impact Development BMP Design Handbook rev. 2/2012

Page 8 ends

Page 716 of 1299 ends

b. For the design without side slopes the following equation shall be used to determine the total effective depth:
dE(ft) = dE(ft) + [(0.3) x ds(ft) + (0.4) x 1(ft)]
The equation below, using the maximum ponding depth of 0.5', is used on the worksheet to find the minimum area required for the Bioretention Facility:
dE(ft) = 0.5 (ft) + [(0.3) x ds(ft) + (0.4) x 1(ft)]
7) Calculate the minimum surface area, AM, required for the Bioretention Facility. This does not include the curb surrounding the Bioretention Facility or side slopes.

AM(ft2) _ VBMP(ft3)
dE (ft)
8) Enter the proposed surface area. This area shall not be less than the minimum required surface area.
9) Verify that side slopes are no steeper than 4:1 in the standard design, and are not required in the modified design.
10) Provide the diameter, minimum 6 inches, of the perforated underdrain used in the Bioretention Facility. See Appendix B for specific information regarding perforated pipes.
11) Provide the slope of the site around the Bioretention Facility, if used. The maximum slope is 3 percent for a standard design.
12) Provide the check dam spacing, if the site around the Bioretention Facility is sloped. 13) Describe the vegetation used within the Bioretention Facility.

Riverside County - Low Impact Development BMP Design Handbook rev. 2/2012

Page 9 ends

Page 717 of 1299 ends

References Used to Develop this Fact Sheet
Anderson, Dale V. "Landscaped Filter Basin Soil Requirements." Riverside, May 2010.

California Department of Transportation. CalTrans Standard Plans. 15 September 2005. May 2010 http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/esc/oe/project_plans/HTM/stdpins-met-new99.htm >.

Camp Dresser and McKee Inc.; Larry Walker Associates. California Stormwater Best Management Practice Handbook for New Development and Redevelopment. California Stormwater Quality Association (CASQA), 2004.

Contra Costa Clean Water Program. Stormwater Quality Requirements for Development Applications. 3rd Edition. Contra Costa, 2006.

County of Los Angeles Public Works. Stormwater Best Management Practice Design and Maintenance Manual. Los Angeles, 2009.

Kim, Hunho, Eric A. Seagren and Allen P. Davis. "Engineered Bioretention for Removal of Nitrate from Stormwater Runoff." Water Environment Research 75.4 (2003): 355-366.

LA Team Effort. LA Team Effort: FREE Planter Boxes for Businesses. 2 November 2009. May 2010 http://lateameffort.blogspot.com/2009/11/free-planter-boxes-for-businesses-est.html >.

Montgomery County Maryland Department of Permitting Services Water Resources Section.

Biofiltration (BF). Montgomery County, 2005.

Program, Ventura Countywide Stormwater Quality Management. Technical Guidance Manual for Stormwater Quality Control Measures. Ventura, 2002.

United States Environmental Protection Agency. Storm Water Technology Fact Sheet Bioretention. Washington D.C, 1999.

Urban Drainage and Flood Control District. Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manual Volume 3 - Best Management Practices. Vol. 3. Denver, 2008. 3 vols.

Urbonas, Ben R. Stormwater Sand Filter Sizing and Design: A Unit Operations Approach. Denver:

Urban Drainage and Flood Control District, 2002.

Riverside County - Low Impact Development BMP Design Handbook rev. 2/2012

Page 10 ends

Page 718 of 1299 ends

Drainage System Maintenance SC -44
Description
As a consequence of its function, the stormwater conveyance system collects and transports urban runoff and stormwater that may contain certain pollutants. The protocols in this fact sheet are intended to reduce pollutants reaching receiving waters through proper conveyance system operation and maintenance.

Approach
Pollution Prevention
Maintain catch basins, stormwater inlets, and other stormwater conveyance structures on a regular basis to remove pollutants, reduce high pollutant concentrations during the first flush of storms, prevent clogging of the downstream conveyance system, restore catch basins' sediment trapping capacity, and ensure the system functions properly hydraulically to avoid flooding.

Suggested Protocols
Catch Basins/Inlet Structures
• Staff should regularly inspect facilities to ensure compliance with the following:
- Immediate repair of any deterioration threatening
structural integrity.
- Cleaning before the sump is 40% full. Catch basins
should be cleaned as frequently as needed to meet this
standard.
- Stenciling of catch basins and inlets (see SC34 Waste Handling and Disposal).

Objectives
• Cover
• Contain
• Educate
• Reduce/Minimize
Targeted Constituents
Sediment
Nutrients
Trash
Metals
Bacteria
Oil and Grease
Organics
ILAsnA
nror�asr«mwaeercus�iryAstoUatlonifornia
Stormwater
Quality
Association
January 2003
California Stormwater BMP Handbook 1 of 6
Industrial and Commercial
Page. 49 lcnecs.corn
You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer ( http://www.novapdf.com)

SC -44 Drainage System Maintenance
• Clean catch basins, storm drain inlets, and other conveyance structures before the wet season to remove sediments and debris accumulated during the summer. • Conduct inspections more frequently during the wet season for problem areas where sediment or trash accumulates more often. Clean and repair as needed. • Keep accurate logs of the number of catch basins cleaned. • Store wastes collected from cleaning activities of the drainage system in appropriate containers or temporary storage sites in a manner that prevents discharge to the storm drain.
• Dewater the wastes if necessary with outflow into the sanitary sewer if permitted. Water should be treated with an appropriate filtering device prior to discharge to the sanitary sewer. If discharge to the sanitary sewer is not allowed, water should be pumped or vacuumed to a tank and properly disposed. Do not dewater near a storm drain or stream.

Storm Drain Conveyance System
• Locate reaches of storm drain with deposit problems and develop a flushing schedule that keeps the pipe clear of excessive buildup.
• Collect and pump flushed effluent to the sanitary sewer for treatment whenever possible.

Pump Stations
• Clean all storm drain pump stations prior to the wet season to remove silt and trash. • Do not allow discharge to reach the storm drain system when cleaning a storm drain pump station or other facility.
• Conduct routine maintenance at each pump station.
• Inspect, clean, and repair as necessary all outlet structures prior to the wet season.

Open Channel
• Modify storm channel characteristics to improve channel hydraulics, increase pollutant removals, and enhance channel/creek aesthetic and habitat value. • Conduct channel modification/improvement in accordance with existing laws. Any person, government agency, or public utility proposing an activity that will change the natural (emphasis added) state of any river, stream, or lake in California, must enter into a Steam or Lake Alteration Agreement with the Department of Fish and Game. The developer -applicant should also contact local governments (city, county, special districts), other state agencies (SWRCB, RWQCB, Department of Forestry, Department of Water Resources), and Federal Corps of Engineers and USFWS.

Illicit Connections and Discharges
• Look for evidence of illegal discharges or illicit connections during routine maintenance of conveyance system and drainage structures:
- Is there evidence of spills such as paints, discoloring, etc? 2 of 6 California Stormwater BMP Handbook
Industrial and Commercial
www.c fPa1gtPa Kt@QM.*OD 9
January 2003
You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer ( http://www.novapdf.com)

Drainage System Maintenance SC -44
- Are there any odors associated with the drainage system? - Record locations of apparent illegal discharges/illicit connections? - Track flows back to potential dischargers and conduct aboveground inspections. This can be done through visual inspection of upgradient manholes or alternate techniques including zinc chloride smoke testing, fluorometric dye testing, physical inspection testing, or television camera inspection.
- Eliminate the discharge once the origin of flow is established. • Stencil or demarcate storm drains, where applicable, to prevent illegal disposal of pollutants.

Storm drain inlets should have messages such as "Dump No Waste Drains to Stream" stenciled next to them to warn against ignorant or intentional dumping of pollutants into the storm drainage system.
• Refer to fact sheet SC-io Non-Stormwater Discharges.

Illegal Dumping
• Inspect and clean up hot spots and other storm drainage areas regularly where illegal dumping and disposal occurs.
• Establish a system for tracking incidents. The system should be designed to identify the following:
- Illegal dumping hot spots
- Types and quantities (in some cases) of wastes
- Patterns in time of occurrence (time of day/night, month, or year) - Mode of dumping (abandoned containers, "midnight dumping" from moving vehicles, direct dumping of materials, accidents/spills)
- Responsible parties
• Post "No Dumping" signs in problem areas with a phone number for reporting dumping and disposal. Signs should also indicate fines and penalties for illegal dumping. • Refer to fact sheet SC-io Non-Stormwater Discharges.

Training
• Train crews in proper maintenance activities, including record keeping and disposal. • Allow only properly trained individuals to handle hazardous materials/wastes. • Have staff involved in detection and removal of illicit connections trained in the following:
- OSHA -required Health and Safety Training (29 CFR 1910.120) plus annual refresher training (as needed).

January 2003
California Stormwater BMP Handbook 3 of 6
Industrial and Commercial
Page.74rr arlcNeks.com
You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer ( http://www.novapdf.com)

SC -44 Drainage System Maintenance
OSHA Confined Space Entry training (Cal -OSHA Confined Space, Title 8 and Federal OSHA 29 CFR 1910.146).
- Procedural training (field screening, sampling, smoke/dye testing, TV inspection).

Spill Response and Prevention
• Investigate all reports of spills, leaks, and/or illegal dumping promptly. • Clean up all spills and leaks using "dry" methods (with absorbent materials and/or rags) or dig up, remove, and properly dispose of contaminated soil. • Refer to fact sheet SC -ii Spill Prevention, Control, and Cleanup.

Other Considerations (Limitations and Regulations)
• Clean-up activities may create a slight disturbance for local aquatic species. Access to items and material on private property may be limited. Trade-offs may exist between channel hydraulics and water quality/riparian habitat. If storm channels or basins are recognized as wetlands, many activities, including maintenance, may be subject to regulation and permitting.
• Storm drain flushing is most effective in small diameter pipes (36 -inch diameter pipe or less, depending on water supply and sediment collection capacity). Other considerations associated with storm drain flushing may include the availability of a water source, finding a downstream area to collect sediments, liquid/sediment disposal, and prohibition against disposal of flushed effluent to sanitary sewer in some areas. • Regulations may include adoption of substantial penalties for illegal dumping and disposal. • Local municipal codes may include sections prohibiting discharge of soil, debris, refuse, hazardous wastes, and other pollutants into the storm drain system.

Requirements
Costs
• An aggressive catch basin cleaning program could require a significant capital and O&M budget.
• The elimination of illegal dumping is dependent on the availability, convenience, and cost of alternative means of disposal. The primary cost is for staff time. Cost depends on how aggressively a program is implemented. Other cost considerations for an illegal dumping program include:
- Purchase and installation of signs.
- Rental of vehicle(s) to haul illegally -disposed items and material to landfills. - Rental of heavy equipment to remove larger items (e.g., car bodies) from channels. - Purchase of landfill space to dispose of illegally -dumped items and material. 4 of 6 California Stormwater BMP Handbook
Industrial and Commercial
www.cfPa1g a ctif• IcOD9
January 2003
You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer ( http://www.novapdf.com)

Drainage System Maintenance SC -44
• Methods used for illicit connection detection (smoke testing, dye testing, visual inspection, and flow monitoring) can be costly and time-consuming. Site -specific factors, such as the level of impervious area, the density and ages of buildings, and type of land use will determine the level of investigation necessary.

Maintenance
• Two -person teams may be required to clean catch basins with vactor trucks. • Teams of at least two people plus administrative personnel are required to identify illicit discharges, depending on the complexity of the storm sewer system. • Arrangements must be made for proper disposal of collected wastes. • Technical staff are required to detect and investigate illegal dumping violations.

Supplemental Information
Further Detail of the BMP
Storm Drain Flushing
Flushing is a common maintenance activity used to improve pipe hydraulics and to remove pollutants in storm drainage systems. Flushing may be designed to hydraulically convey accumulated material to strategic locations, such as an open channel, another point where flushing will be initiated, or the sanitary sewer and the treatment facilities, thus preventing resuspension and overflow of a portion of the solids during storm events. Flushing prevents "plug flow" discharges of concentrated pollutant loadings and sediments. Deposits can hinder the designed conveyance capacity of the storm drain system and potentially cause backwater conditions in severe cases of clogging.

Storm drain flushing usually takes place along segments of pipe with grades that are too flat to maintain adequate velocity to keep particles in suspension. An upstream manhole is selected to place an inflatable device that temporarily plugs the pipe. Further upstream, water is pumped into the line to create a flushing wave. When the upstream reach of pipe is sufficiently full to cause a flushing wave, the inflated device is rapidly deflated with the assistance of a vacuum pump, thereby releasing the backed up water and resulting in the cleaning of the storm drain segment.

To further reduce impacts of stormwater pollution, a second inflatable device placed well downstream may be used to recollect the water after the force of the flushing wave has dissipated. A pump may then be used to transfer the water and accumulated material to the sanitary sewer for treatment. In some cases, an interceptor structure may be more practical or required to recollect the flushed waters.

It has been found that cleansing efficiency of periodic flush waves is dependent upon flush volume, flush discharge rate, sewer slope, sewer length, sewer flow rate, sewer diameter, and population density. As a rule of thumb, the length of line to be flushed should not exceed 700 feet. At this maximum recommended length, the percent removal efficiency ranges between 65- 75% for organics and 55-65% for dry weather grit/inorganic material. The percent removal efficiency drops rapidly beyond that. Water is commonly supplied by a water truck, but fire hydrants can also supply water. To make the best use of water, it is recommended that reclaimed water be used or that fire hydrant line flushing coincide with storm sewer flushing.

January 2003
California Stormwater BMP Handbook 5 of 6
Industrial and Commercial
Page.74131l lcnecs. corn
You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer ( http://www.novapdf.com)

SC -44 Drainage System Maintenance
References and Resources
California's Nonpoint Source Program Plan http://www.swrcb.ca.gov/nps/index.html Clark County Storm Water Pollution Control Manual
http://www.co.clark.wa.us/pubworks/bmpman.pdf
Ferguson, B.K. 1991. Urban Stream Reclamation, p. 324-322, Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

King County Storm Water Pollution Control Manual http://dnr.metrokc.gov/w1r/dss/spcm.htm Oregon Association of Clean Water Agencies. Oregon Municipal Stormwater Toolbox for Maintenance Practices. June 1998.

Santa Clara Valley Urban Runoff Pollution Prevention Program http://www.scvurppp.org , The Storm Water Managers Resource Center http://www.stormwatercenter.net United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2002. Pollution Prevention/Good Housekeeping for Municipal Operations Storm Drain System Cleaning. On line:
http://www.epa.gov/npdes/menuofbmps/poll 16.htm
6 of 6 California Stormwater BMP Handbook
Industrial and Commercial
January 2003
www.c ea724cb#.4299
You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer ( http://www.novapdf.com)

Landscape Maintenance
SC -73
Description
Landscape maintenance activities include vegetation removal; herbicide and insecticide application; fertilizer application; watering; and other gardening and lawn care practices.

Vegetation control typically involves a combination of chemical (herbicide) application and mechanical methods. All of these maintenance practices have the potential to contribute pollutants to the storm drain system. The major objectives of this BMP are to minimize the discharge of pesticides, herbicides and fertilizers to the storm drain system and receiving waters; prevent the disposal of landscape waste into the storm drain system by collecting and properly disposing of clippings and cuttings, and educating employees and the public.

Approach
Pollution Prevention
• Implement an integrated pest management (IPM) program.

IPM is a sustainable approach to managing pests by
combining biological, cultural, physical, and chemical tools. • Choose low water using flowers, trees, shrubs, and
groundcover.
• Consider alternative landscaping techniques such as
naturescaping and xeriscaping.
• Conduct appropriate maintenance (i.e. properly timed
fertilizing, weeding, pest control, and pruning) to help preserve the landscapes water efficiency.

Objectives
• Contain
• Educate
• Red ucelMinimize
• Product Substitution
Targeted Constituents
Sediment
Nutrients
Trash
Metals
Bacteria
Oil and Grease
Organics
Oxygen Demanding

CALEFORNIA SIORMWATFR
January 2003
California Stormwater BMP Handbook
Municipal
Page . N 5 Idi r1lbQ&s. corn
1 of 6

SC -73 Landscape Maintenance
• Consider grass cycling (grass cycling is the natural recycling of grass by leaving the clippings on the lawn when mowing. Grass clippings decompose quickly and release valuable nutrients back into the lawn).

Suggested Protocols
Mowing, Trimming, and Weeding
• Whenever possible use mechanical methods of vegetation removal (e.g mowing with tractor - type or push mowers, hand cutting with gas or electric powered weed trimmers) rather than applying herbicides. Use hand weeding where practical.
• Avoid loosening the soil when conducting mechanical or manual weed control, this could lead to erosion. Use mulch or other erosion control measures when soils are exposed. • Performing mowing at optimal times. Mowing should not be performed if significant rain events are predicted.
• Mulching mowers may be recommended for certain flat areas. Other techniques may be employed to minimize mowing such as selective vegetative planting using low maintenance grasses and shrubs.
• Collect lawn and garden clippings, pruning waste, tree trimmings, and weeds. Chip if necessary, and compost or dispose of at a landfill (see waste management section of this fact sheet).
• Place temporarily stockpiled material away from watercourses, and berm or cover stockpiles to prevent material releases to storm drains.

Planting
• Determine existing native vegetation features (location, species, size, function, importance) and consider the feasibility of protecting them. Consider elements such as their effect on drainage and erosion, hardiness, maintenance requirements, and possible conflicts between preserving vegetation and the resulting maintenance needs. • Retain and/or plant selected native vegetation whose features are determined to be beneficial, where feasible. Native vegetation usually requires less maintenance (e.g., irrigation, fertilizer) than planting new vegetation.
• Consider using low water use groundcovers when planting or replanting.

Waste Management
• Compost leaves, sticks, or other collected vegetation or dispose of at a permitted landfill. Do not dispose of collected vegetation into waterways or storm drainage systems. • Place temporarily stockpiled material away from watercourses and storm drain inlets, and berm or cover stockpiles to prevent material releases to the storm drain system. • Reduce the use of high nitrogen fertilizers that produce excess growth requiring more frequent mowing or trimming.
2 of 6 California Stormwater BMP Handbook
Municipal
www.cfkigeaKtactif.1.299
January 2003

Landscape Maintenance SC -73
• Avoid landscape wastes in and around storm drain inlets by either using bagging equipment or by manually picking up the material.

Irrigation
• Where practical, use automatic timers to minimize runoff. • Use popup sprinkler heads in areas with a lot of activity or where there is a chance the pipes may be broken. Consider the use of mechanisms that reduce water flow to sprinkler heads if broken.
• Ensure that there is no runoff from the landscaped area(s) if re-claimed water is used for irrigation.
• If bailing of muddy water is required (e.g. when repairing a water line leak), do not put it in the storm drain; pour over landscaped areas.
• Irrigate slowly or pulse irrigate to prevent runoff and then only irrigate as much as is needed.
• Apply water at rates that do not exceed the infiltration rate of the soil.

Fertilizer and Pesticide Management
• Utilize a comprehensive management system that incorporates integrated pest management (IPM) techniques. There are many methods and types of IPM, including the following:

Mulching can be used to prevent weeds where turf is absent, fencing installed to keep rodents out, and netting used to keep birds and insects away from leaves and fruit.

Visible insects can be removed by hand (with gloves or tweezers) and placed in soapy water or vegetable oil. Alternatively, insects can be sprayed off the plant with water or in some cases vacuumed off of larger plants.

Store-bought traps, such as species -specific, pheromone -based traps or colored sticky cards, can be used.

Slugs can be trapped in small cups filled with beer that are set in the ground so the slugs can get in easily.

In cases where microscopic parasites, such as bacteria and fungi, are causing damage to plants, the affected plant material can be removed and disposed of (pruning equipment should be disinfected with bleach to prevent spreading the disease organism).

Small mammals and birds can be excluded using fences, netting, tree trunk guards.

Beneficial organisms, such as bats, birds, green lacewings, ladybugs, praying mantis, ground beetles, parasitic nematodes, trichogramma wasps, seed head weevils, and spiders that prey on detrimental pest species can be promoted. • Follow all federal, state, and local laws and regulations governing the use, storage, and disposal of fertilizers and pesticides and training of applicators and pest control advisors.

January 2003
California Stormwater BMP Handbook
Municipal
Purge. 1177 i3r1�bi jcs.com
3 of 6

SC -73 Landscape Maintenance
• Use pesticides only if there is an actual pest problem (not on a regular preventative schedule).
• Do not use pesticides if rain is expected. Apply pesticides only when wind speeds are low (less than 5 mph).
• Do not mix or prepare pesticides for application near storm drains. • Prepare the minimum amount of pesticide needed for the job and use the lowest rate that will effectively control the pest.
• Employ techniques to minimize off -target application (e.g. spray drift) of pesticides, including consideration of alternative application techniques. • Fertilizers should be worked into the soil rather than dumped or broadcast onto the surface. • Calibrate fertilizer and pesticide application equipment to avoid excessive application. • Periodically test soils for determining proper fertilizer use. • Sweep pavement and sidewalk if fertilizer is spilled on these surfaces before applying irrigation water.
• Purchase only the amount of pesticide that you can reasonably use in a given time period (month or year depending on the product).
• Triple rinse containers, and use rinse water as product. Dispose of unused pesticide as hazardous waste.
• Dispose of empty pesticide containers according to the instructions on the container label.

Inspection
• Inspect irrigation system periodically to ensure that the right amount of water is being applied and that excessive runoff is not occurring. Minimize excess watering, and repair leaks in the irrigation system as soon as they are observed. • Inspect pesticide/fertilizer equipment and transportation vehicles daily.

Training
• Educate and train employees on use of pesticides and in pesticide application techniques to prevent pollution. Pesticide application must be under the supervision of a California qualified pesticide applicator.
• Train/encourage municipal maintenance crews to use IPM techniques for managing public green areas.
• Annually train employees within departments responsible for pesticide application on the appropriate portions of the agency's IPM Policy, SOPs, and BMPs, and the latest IPM techniques.
4 of 6 California Stormwater BMP Handbook
Municipal
www. arge MOM 4.299
January 2003

Landscape Maintenance SC -73
• Employees who are not authorized and trained to apply pesticides should be periodically (at least annually) informed that they cannot use over-the-counter pesticides in or around the workplace.
• Use a training log or similar method to document training.

Spill Response and Prevention
• Refer to SC -ii, Spill Prevention, Control & Cleanup
• Have spill cleanup materials readily available and in a know in location • Cleanup spills immediately and use dry methods if possible. • Properly dispose of spill cleanup material.

Other Considerations
• The Federal Pesticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act and California Title 3, Division 6, Pesticides and Pest Control Operations place strict controls over pesticide application and handling and specify training, annual refresher, and testing requirements. The regulations generally cover: a list of approved pesticides and selected uses, updated regularly; general application information; equipment use and maintenance procedures; and record keeping.

The California Department of Pesticide Regulations and the County Agricultural Commission coordinate and maintain the licensing and certification programs. All public agency employees who apply pesticides and herbicides in "agricultural use" areas such as parks, golf courses, rights -of -way and recreation areas should be properly certified in accordance with state regulations. Contracts for landscape maintenance should include similar requirements.
• All employees who handle pesticides should be familiar with the most recent material safety data sheet (MSDS) files.
• Municipalities do not have the authority to regulate the use of pesticides by school districts, however the California Healthy Schools Act of 2000 (AB 226o) has imposed requirements on California school districts regarding pesticide use in schools. Posting of notification prior to the application of pesticides is now required, and IPM is stated as the preferred approach to pest management in schools.

Requirements
Costs
Additional training of municipal employees will be required to address IPM techniques and BMPs. IPM methods will likely increase labor cost for pest control which may be offset by lower chemical costs.

Maintenance
Not applicable
January 2003
California Stormwater BMP Handbook
Municipal
Page•729 r1 s-cam
5 of 6

SC -73 Landscape Maintenance
Supplemental Information
Further Detail (lithe BMP
Waste Management
Composting is one of the better disposal alternatives if locally available. Most municipalities either have or are planning yard waste composting facilities as a means of reducing the amount of waste going to the landfill. Lawn clippings from municipal maintenance programs as well as private sources would probably be compatible with most composting facilities Contractors and Other Pesticide Users
Municipal agencies should develop and implement a process to ensure that any contractor employed to conduct pest control and pesticide application on municipal property engages in pest control methods consistent with the IPM Policy adopted by the agency. Specifically, municipalities should require contractors to follow the agency's IPM policy, SOPs, and BMPs; provide evidence to the agency of having received training on current IPM techniques when feasible; provide documentation of pesticide use on agency property to the agency in a timely manner.

References and Resources
King County Stormwater Pollution Control Manual. Best Management Practices for Businesses. 1995. King County Surface Water Management. July. On-line:
http://dnr.metroke.gov/w1r/dssispcm.htm
Los Angeles County Stormwater Quality Model Programs. Public Agency Activities http://ladpw.org/wmd/npdes/model links . cfm
Model Urban Runoff Program: A How -To Guide for Developing Urban Runoff Programs for Small Municipalities. Prepared by City of Monterey, City of Santa Cruz, California Coastal Commission, Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary, Association of Monterey Bay Area Governments, Woodward -Clyde, Central Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board. July. 1998.

Orange County Stormwater Program
http://www.ocwatersheds.com/StormWater/swp introduction.asp Santa Clara Valley Urban Runoff Pollution Prevention Program. 1997 Urban Runoff Management Plan. September 1997, updated October 2000.

United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2002. Pollution Prevention/Good Housekeeping for Municipal Operations Landscaping and Lawn Care. Office of Water. Office of Wastewater Management. On-line: http://www.epa.gov/npdes/menuofbmps/poll 8. htm 6 of 6 California Stormwater BMP Handbook
Municipal
www• cfbagea7$flq1-4c299
January 2003

Site Design & Landscape Planning SD -10
Design Objectives
Maximize Infiltration
Provide Retention
Slow Runoff
Minimize Impervious Land
Coverage
Prohibit Dumping of Improper
Materials
Contain Pollutants
Collect and Convey
Description
Each project site possesses unique topographic, hydrologic, and vegetative features, some of which are more suitable for development than others. Integrating and incorporating appropriate landscape planning methodologies into the project design is the most effective action that can be done to minimize surface and groundwater contamination from stormwater.

Approach
Landscape planning should couple consideration of land suitability for urban uses with consideration of community goals and projected growth. Project plan designs should conserve natural areas to the extent possible, maximize natural water storage and infiltration opportunities, and protect slopes and channels.

Suitable Applications
Appropriate applications include residential, commercial and industrial areas planned for development or redevelopment.

Design Considerations
Design requirements for site design and landscapes planning should conform to applicable standards and specifications of agencies with jurisdiction and be consistent with applicable General Plan and Local Area Plan policies.
1 of 4
January 2003
California Stormwater BMP Handbook
New Development and Redevelopment
Page. m rJi i r1QD4fi}cs.corn

SD -10 Site Design & Landscape Planning
Designing New Installations
Begin the development of a plan for the landscape unit with attention to the following general principles:
• Formulate the plan on the basis of clearly articulated community goals. Carefully identify conflicts and choices between retaining and protecting desired resources and community growth.
• Map and assess land suitability for urban uses. Include the following landscape features in the assessment: wooded land, open unwooded land, steep slopes, erosion -prone soils, foundation suitability, soil suitability for waste disposal, aquifers, aquifer recharge areas, wetlands, floodplains, surface waters, agricultural lands, and various categories of urban land use. When appropriate, the assessment can highlight outstanding local or regional resources that the community determines should be protected (e.g., a scenic area, recreational area, threatened species habitat, farmland, fish run). Mapping and assessment should recognize not only these resources but also additional areas needed for their sustenance.

Project plan designs should conserve natural areas to the extent possible, maximize natural water storage and infiltration opportunities, and protect slopes and channels.

Conserve Natural Areas during Landscape Planning
If applicable, the following items are required and must be implemented in the site layout during the subdivision design and approval process, consistent with applicable General Plan and Local Area Plan policies:
• Cluster development on least -sensitive portions of a site while leaving the remaining land in a natural undisturbed condition.
• Limit clearing and grading of native vegetation at a site to the minimum amount needed to build lots, allow access, and provide fire protection.
• Maximize trees and other vegetation at each site by planting additional vegetation, clustering tree areas, and promoting the use of native and/or drought tolerant plants. • Promote natural vegetation by using parking lot islands and other landscaped areas. • Preserve riparian areas and wetlands.

Maximize Natural Water Storage and Infiltration Opportunities Within the Landscape Unit • Promote the conservation of forest cover. Building on land that is already deforested affects basin hydrology to a lesser extent than converting forested land. Loss of forest cover reduces interception storage, detention in the organic forest floor layer, and water losses by evapotranspiration, resulting in large peak runoff increases and either their negative effects or the expense of countering them with structural solutions. • Maintain natural storage reservoirs and drainage corridors, including depressions, areas of permeable soils, swales, and intermittent streams. Develop and implement policies and 2 of 4 California Stormwater BMP Handbook
New Development and Redevelopment
www. c tgba7$hgl3S-4 99
January 2003

Site Design & Landscape Planning SD -10
regulations to discourage the clearing, filling, and channelization of these features. Utilize them in drainage networks in preference to pipes, culverts, and engineered ditches. • Evaluating infiltration opportunities by referring to the stormwater management manual for the jurisdiction and pay particular attention to the selection criteria for avoiding groundwater contamination, poor soils, and hydrogeological conditions that cause these facilities to fail. If necessary, locate developments with large amounts of impervious surfaces or a potential to produce relatively contaminated runoff away from groundwater recharge areas.

Protection of Slopes and Channels during Landscape Design • Convey runoff safely from the tops of slopes.
• Avoid disturbing steep or unstable slopes.
• Avoid disturbing natural channels.
• Stabilize disturbed slopes as quickly as possible.
• Vegetate slopes with native or drought tolerant vegetation. • Control and treat flows in landscaping and/or other controls prior to reaching existing natural drainage systems.
• Stabilize temporary and permanent channel crossings as quickly as possible, and ensure that increases in run-off velocity and frequency caused by the project do not erode the channel. • Install energy dissipaters, such as riprap, at the outlets of new storm drains, culverts, conduits, or channels that enter unlined channels in accordance with applicable specifications to minimize erosion. Energy dissipaters shall be installed in such a way as to minimize impacts to receiving waters.
• Line on -site conveyance channels where appropriate, to reduce erosion caused by increased flow velocity due to increases in tributary impervious area. The first choice for linings should be grass or some other vegetative surface, since these materials not only reduce runoff velocities, but also provide water quality benefits from filtration and infiltration. If velocities in the channel are high enough to erode grass or other vegetative linings, riprap, concrete, soil cement, or geo-grid stabilization are other alternatives. • Consider other design principles that are comparable and equally effective.

Redeveloping Existing Installations
Various jurisdictional stormwater management and mitigation plans (SUSMP, WQMP, etc.) define "redevelopment" in terms of amounts of additional impervious area, increases in gross floor area and/or exterior construction, and land disturbing activities with structural or impervious surfaces. The definition of " redevelopment" must be consulted to determine whether or not the requirements for new development apply to areas intended for redevelopment. If the definition applies, the steps outlined under "designing new installations" above should be followed.

January 2003
California Stormwater BMP Handbook
New Development and Redevelopment
Page.74fi r Ibi Acs -cam
3 of 4

SD -10 Site Design & Landscape Planning
Redevelopment may present significant opportunity to add features which had not previously been implemented. Examples include incorporation of depressions, areas of permeable soils, and swales in newly redeveloped areas. While some site constraints may exist due to the status of already existing infrastructure, opportunities should not be missed to maximize infiltration, slow runoff, reduce impervious areas, disconnect directly connected impervious areas.

Other Resources
A Manual for the Standard Urban Stormwater Mitigation Plan (SUSMP), Los Angeles County Department of Public Works, May 2002.

Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington, Washington State Department of Ecology, August 2001.

Model Standard Urban Storm Water Mitigation Plan (SUSMP) for San Diego County, Port of San Diego, and Cities in San Diego County, February 14, 2002.

Model Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for County of Orange, Orange County Flood Control District, and the Incorporated Cities of Orange County, Draft February 2003.

Ventura Countywide Technical Guidance Manual for Stormwater Quality Control Measures, July 2002.
4 of 4 California Stormwater BMP Handbook
New Development and Redevelopment
www. c tgta7 * $.41,99
January 2003

Rain Garden
Roof Runoff Controls SD -11
Design Objectives
El Maximize Infiltration
Q Provide Retention
Q Slow Runoff
Minimize Impervious Land
Coverage
Prohibit Dumping of Improper
Materials
▪ Contain Pollutants
Collect and Convey
Description
Various roof runoff controls are available to address stormwater that drains off rooftops. The objective is to reduce the total volume and rate of runoff from individual lots, and retain the pollutants on site that may be picked up from roofing materials and atmospheric deposition. Roof runoff controls consist of directing the roof runoff away from paved areas and mitigating flow to the storm drain system through one of several general approaches: cisterns or rain barrels; dry wells or infiltration trenches; pop-up emitters, and foundation planting. The first three approaches require the roof runoff to be contained in a gutter and downspout system. Foundation planting provides a vegetated strip under the drip line of the roof.

Approach
Design of individual lots for single-family homes as well as lots for higher density residential and commercial structures should consider site design provisions for containing and infiltrating roof runoff or directing roof runoff to vegetative swales or buffer areas. Retained water can be reused for watering gardens, lawns, and trees. Benefits to the environment include reduced demand for potable water used for irrigation, improved stormwater quality, increased groundwater recharge, decreased runoff volume and peak flows, and decreased flooding potential.

Suitable Applications
Appropriate applications include residential, commercial and industrial areas planned for development or redevelopment.

Design Considerations
Designing New Installations
Cisterns or Rain Barrels
One method of addressing roof runoff is to direct roof downspouts to cisterns or rain barrels. A cistern is an above ground storage vessel with either a manually operated valve or a permanently open outlet. Roof runoff is temporarily stored and then released for irrigation or infiltration between storms. The number of rain 1 of 3
January 2003
California Stormwater BMP Handbook
New Development and Redevelopment
P 7 dfiafi k. corn

SD -11 Roof Runoff Controls
barrels needed is a function of the rooftop area. Some low impact developers recommend that every house have at least 2 rain barrels, with a minimum storage capacity of laaa liters. Roof barrels serve several purposes including mitigating the first flush from the roof which has a high volume, amount of contaminants, and thermal load. Several types of rain barrels are commercially available. Consideration must be given to selecting rain barrels that are vector proof and childproof. In addition, some barrels are designed with a bypass valve that filters out grit and other contaminants and routes overflow to a soak -away pit or rain garden.

If the cistern has an operable valve, the valve can be closed to store stormwater for irrigation or infiltration between storms. This system requires continual monitoring by the resident or grounds crews, but provides greater flexibility in water storage and metering. If a cistern is provided with an operable valve and water is stored inside for long periods, the cistern must be covered to prevent mosquitoes from breeding.

A cistern system with a permanently open outlet can also provide for metering stormwater runoff. If the cistern outlet is significantly smaller than the size of the downspout inlet (say 114 to l inch diameter), runoff will build up inside the cistern during storms, and will empty out slowly after peak intensities subside. This is a feasible way to mitigate the peak flow increases caused by rooftop impervious land coverage, especially for the frequent, small storms.

Dry wells and Infiltration Trenches
Roof downspouts can be directed to dry wells or infiltration trenches. A dry well is constructed by excavating a hole in the ground and filling it with an open graded aggregate, and allowing the water to fill the dry well and infiltrate after the storm event. An underground connection from the downspout conveys water into the dry well, allowing it to be stored in the voids. To minimize sedimentation from lateral soil movement, the sides and top of the stone storage matrix can be wrapped in a permeable filter fabric, though the bottom may remain open. A perforated observation pipe can be inserted vertically into the dry well to allow for inspection and maintenance.

In practice, dry wells receiving runoff from single roof downspouts have been successful over long periods because they contain very little sediment. They must be sized according to the amount of rooftop runoff received, but are typically 4 to 5 feet square, and 2 to 3 feet deep, with a minimum of 1 -foot soil cover over the top (maximum depth of 10 feet).

To protect the foundation, dry wells must be set away from the building at least 10 feet. They must be installed in solids that accommodate infiltration. In poorly drained soils, dry wells have very limited feasibility.

Infiltration trenches function in a similar manner and would be particularly effective for larger roof areas. An infiltration trench is a long, narrow, rock -filled trench with no outlet that receives stormwater runoff. These are described under Treatment Controls.

Pop-up Drainage Emitter
Roof downspouts can be directed to an underground pipe that daylights some distance from the building foundation, releasing the roof runoff through a pop-up emitter. Similar to a pop-up irrigation head, the emitter only opens when there is flow from the roof. The emitter remains flush to the ground during dry periods, for ease of lawn or landscape maintenance. 2 of 3 California Stormwater BMP Handbook
New Development and Redevelopment
www.cFlaCbaT3163@ c1 9
January 2003

Roof Runoff Controls SD -11
Foundation Planting
Landscape planting can be provided around the base to allow increased opportunities for stormwater infiltration and protect the soil from erosion caused by concentrated sheet flow coming off the roof. Foundation plantings can reduce the physical impact of water on the soil and provide a subsurface matrix of roots that encourage infiltration. These plantings must be sturdy enough to tolerate the heavy runoff sheet flows, and periodic soil saturation.

Supplemental Information
Examples
• City of Ottawa's Water Links Surface —Water Quality Protection Program • City of Toronto Downspout Disconnection Program
• City of Boston, MA, Rain Barrel Demonstration Program Other Resources
Hager, Marty Catherine, Stormwater, "Low -Impact Development", January/February 2003. www.stormh2o.com
Low Impact Urban Design Tools, Low Impact Development Design Center, Beltsville, MD. www.lid-stormwater.net
Start at the Source, Bay Area Stormwater Management Agencies Association, 1999 Edition January 2003
California Stormwater BMP Handbook
New Development and Redevelopment
P 74337ne(iafi k. corn
3 of 3

Efficient Irrigation SD -12
Description
Design Objectives
® Maximize Infiltration
• Provide Retention
Q Slow Runoff
Minimize Impervious Land
Coverage
Prohibit Dumping of Improper
Materials
Contain Pollutants
Collect and Convey
Irrigation water provided to landscaped areas may result in excess irrigation water being conveyed into stormwater drainage systems.

Approach
Project plan designs for development and redevelopment should include application methods of irrigation water that minimize runoff of excess irrigation water into the stormwater conveyance system.

Suitable Applications
Appropriate applications include residential, commercial and industrial areas planned for development or redevelopment. (Detached residential single-family homes are typically excluded from this requirement.)
Design Considerations
Designing New Installations
The following methods to reduce excessive irrigation runoff should be considered, and incorporated and implemented where determined applicable and feasible by the Permittee:
• Employ rain -triggered shutoff devices to prevent irrigation after precipitation. • Design irrigation systems to each landscape area's specific water requirements. • Include design featuring flow reducers or shutoff valves triggered by a pressure drop to control water loss in the event of broken sprinkler heads or lines.
• Implement landscape plans consistent with County or City water conservation resolutions, which may include provision of water sensors, programmable irrigation times (for short cycles), etc.
1 of 2
January 2003
California stormwater BMP Handbook
New Development and Redevelopment
Page. 831a rkc2b9g<s.com

SD -12 Efficient Irrigation
• Design timing and application methods of irrigation water to minimize the runoff of excess irrigation water into the storm water drainage system.
• Group plants with similar water requirements in order to reduce excess irrigation runoff and promote surface filtration. Choose plants with low irrigation requirements (for example, native or drought tolerant species). Consider design features such as:

Using mulches (such as wood chips or bar) in planter areas without ground cover to minimize sediment in runoff
Installing appropriate plant materials for the location, in accordance with amount of sunlight and climate, and use native plant materials where possible and/or as recommended by the landscape architect
Leaving a vegetative barrier along the property boundary and interior watercourses, to act as a pollutant filter, where appropriate and feasible Choosing plants that minimize or eliminate the use of fertilizer or pesticides to sustain growth
• Employ other comparable, equally effective methods to reduce irrigation water runoff.

Other Resources
A Manual for the Standard Urban Stormwater Mitigation Plan (SUSMP), Los Angeles County Department of Public Works, May 2002.

Model Standard Urban Storm Water Mitigation Plan (SUSMP) for San Diego County, Port of San Diego, and Cities in San Diego County, February 14, 2002.

Model Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for County of Orange, Orange County Flood Control District, and the Incorporated Cities of Orange County, Draft February 2003.

Description
Storm Drain Signage SD -13
Design Objectives
Maximize Infiltration
Provide Retention
Slow Runoff
Minimize Impervious Land
Coverage
Prohibit Dumping of Improper
Materials
Contain Pollutants
Collect and Convey
Waste materials dumped into storm drain inlets can have severe impacts on receiving and ground waters. Posting notices regarding discharge prohibitions at storm drain inlets can prevent waste dumping. Storm drain signs and stencils are highly visible source controls that are typically placed directly adjacent to storm drain inlets_ Approach
The stencil or affixed sign contains a brief statement that prohibits dumping of improper materials into the urban runoff conveyance system. Storm drain messages have become a popular method of alerting the public about the effects of and the prohibitions against waste disposal.

Suitable Applications
Stencils and signs alert the public to the destination of pollutants discharged to the storm drain.

Signs are appropriate in residential, commercial, and industrial areas, as well as any other area where contributions or dumping to storm drains is likely_ Design Considerations
Storm drain message markers or placards are recommended at all storm drain inlets within the boundary of a development project. The marker should be placed in clear sight facing toward anyone approaching the inlet from either side. All storm drain inlet locations should be identified on the development site map.

Designing New Installations
The following methods should be considered for inclusion in the project design and show on project plans:
• Provide stenciling or labeling of all storm drain inlets and catch basins, constructed or modified, within the project area with prohibitive language. Examples include "NO DUMPING CALIFORNIA SNRVfS'c ATER
January 2003
California Stormwater BMP Handbook
New Development and Redevelopment
Page. (1l FlaWs.com
You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer ( http://www.novapdf.com) 1 of 2

SD -13 Storm Drain Signage
— DRAINS TO OCEAN" and/or other graphical icons to discourage illegal dumping. • Post signs with prohibitive language and/or graphical icons, which prohibit illegal dumping at public access points along channels and creeks within the project area.

Note - Some local agencies have approved specific signage and/or storm drain message placards for use. Consult local agency stormwater staff to determine specific requirements for placard types and methods of application.

Redeveloping Existing Installations
Various jurisdictional stormwater management and mitigation plans (SUSMP, WQMP, etc.) define "redevelopment" in terms of amounts of additional impervious area, increases in gross floor area and/or exterior construction, and land disturbing activities with structural or impervious surfaces. If the project meets the definition of "redevelopment", then the requirements stated under " designing new installations" above should be included in all project design plans.

Additional Information
Maintenance Considerations
• Legibility of markers and signs should be maintained. If required by the agency with jurisdiction over the project, the owner/operator or homeowner's association should enter into a maintenance agreement with the agency or record a deed restriction upon the property title to maintain the legibility of placards or signs.

Placement
• Signage on top of curbs tends to weather and fade.
• Signage on face of curbs tends to be worn by contact with vehicle tires and sweeper brooms.

Supplemental Information
Examples
• Most MS4 programs have storm drain signage programs_ Some MS4 programs will provide stencils, or arrange for volunteers to stencil storm drains as part of their outreach program.

Other Resources
A Manual for the Standard Urban Stormwater Mitigation Plan (SUSMP), Los Angeles County Department of Public Works, May 2002.

Model Standard Urban Storm Water Mitigation Plan (SUSMP) for San Diego County, Port of San Diego, and Cities in San Diego County, February 14, 2002.

Model Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for County of Orange, Orange County Flood Control District, and the Incorporated Cities of Orange County, Draft February 24303.

Ventura Countywide Technical Guidance Manual for Stormwater Quality Control Measures, July 2002.
2 of 2 California Stormwater BMP Handbook
New Development and Redevelopment
www.cRagt• a74149$-44 99
You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer ( http://www.novapdf.com) January 2003

03 di ,r uazgo }�
wo' ay) aijjj
?LJi&,it isstormwater runa
Stormwater runoff occurs when precipitation
from rain or snowmelt flows over the ground.

Impervious surfaces like driveways, sidewalks,
and streets prevent stormwater from
naturally soaking into the ground.
?(4 is stormwater runa f f
pro6fem?
Stormwater can pick up debris, chemicals, dirt, and other pollutants and flow into a storm sewer system or directly to a lake, stream, river, wetland, or coastal water. Anything that enters a storm sewer system is discharged untreated into the waterbodies we use for swimming, fishing, and providing drinking water.

Page 74 ends

flLVAA N' T1D
JO NVRA 3Hi
Jaded palohoe aad euuol49 sseooJd
uoolsod ./001:4 uo sNul Poses I!O
algele6eA 41!M Paluud algel.CoaWllpalORoaa
no6'eda'MMM,fd11H Ilan) sse,ppVleualul
ZOO -£O -S-££8 Vd
Rou ku3 vd 3 /\
uopoaya yu d!e auauoe6
sayeyS pa1!un V
sdu/na•eda inmm
aalemuuo1s/sapdu/na•eda 'MAMA
11[SIA JO
:pe;uoa uol;euuoJul azow Jod
SNIVU 11 N]HM
Tke effects' of �aLfian
Polluted stormwater runoff can have
many adverse effects on plants, fish,
animals, and people.
• Sediment can cloud the water
and make it difficult or
impossible for aquatic plants to
grow Sediment also can
destroy aquatic habitats.
• Excess nutrients can cause
algae blooms. When algae die,
they sink to the bottom and decompose
in a process that removes oxygen from
the water. Fish and other aquatic
organisms can't exist in water with low
dissolved oxygen levels.
• Bacteria and other pathogens can wash
into swimming areas and create health
hazards, often making beach closures
necessary.
• Debris —plastic bags, six-pack rings, bottles, and
cigarette butts —washed into waterbodies can choke, suffocate, or disable aquatic life like ducks, fish, turtles, and birds. • Household hazardous wastes like insecticides, pesticides, paint, solvents, used motor oil, and other auto fluids can poison aquatic life.

Land animals and people can become sick or die from eating diseased fish and shellfish or ingesting polluted water.
• Polluted stormwater often
affects drinking water
sources. This, in turn, can
affect human health and
increase drinking water
treatment costs.

Storrnwateri Pollution So[utions
Peep ort pluipm4 dupat& o hou4eho&d p'wducE that
cow eleauea& QuAA 04 i&uee&1de4, peiteich, pau-ct
4o&ea, ad cued mote acc a&cd ally& auto .

Dow tpow le" orb tle g7ouad at icta Aqukt, dxaicu.

Lawn care
Excess fertilizers
and pesticides
applied to lawns
and gardens wash
off and pollute
streams. In
addition, yard
clippings and
leaves can wash
into storm drains and contribute
nutrients and organic matter to streams.
• Don't overwater your lawn. Consider
using a soaker hose instead of a
sprinkler.
• Use pesticides and fertilizers
sparingly. When use is necessary, use
these chemicals in the recommended
amounts. Use organic mulch or safer
pest control methods whenever
possible.
• Compost or mulch yard waste. Don't
leave it in the street or sweep it into
storm drains or streams.
• Cover piles of dirt or mulch being
used in landscaping projects.

Septic
systems
Leaking and
poorly
maintained
septic
systems release nutrients and
pathogens (bacteria and
viruses) that can be picked up
by stormwater and discharged
into nearby waterbodies.

Pathogens can cause public
health problems and
environmental concerns.

Auto care
Washing your car and
degreasing auto parts at home
can send detergents and other
contaminants through the
storm sewer system. Dumping
automotive fluids into storm
drains has the same result as
dumping the materials directly
into a waterbody.
• Use a commercial car wash that treats or
recycles its wastewater, or wash your car on
your yard so the water infiltrates into the
ground.
• Repair leaks and dispose of used auto fluids
and batteries at designated drop-off or
recycling locations.
• Inspect your system every
3 years and pump your
tank as necessary (every 3
to 5 years).
• Don't dispose of
household hazardous
waste in sinks or toilets.

Pet waste
Pet waste can be
a major source of
bacteria and
excess nutrients
in local waters.
• When walking
your pet,
remember to pick up the
waste and dispose of it
properly. Flushing pet
waste is the best disposal
method. Leaving pet waste
on the ground increases
public health risks by
allowing harmful bacteria
and nutrients to wash into
the storm drain and
eventually into local
waterbodies.

Edu atiow 14 &torrid& eltuAgic+g peop14 behalf -tot.

S jr i aNd maxke gem Slut dxaim theca tegdec
tlat pollata4 erctedify dxat&ce will 6e ewucied
cuttreated load wateirborzy.

Permeable Pavement —Traditional concrete and
asphalt don't allow water to soak into the ground.

Instead these surfaces rely on storm drains to
divert unwanted water. Permeable pavement
systems allow rain and snowmelt to soak through,
decreasing stormwater runoff.

Rain Barrels —You can
collect rainwater from
rooftops in mosquito -
proof containers. The
water can be used later on
lawn or garden areas.

Rain Gardens and
Grassy Swales—Specially
designed areas planted
with native plants
can provide natural places for
rainwater to collect
and soak into the
ground. Rain from
rooftop areas or paved
areas can be diverted
into these areas rather
than into storm drains.

Vegetated Filter Strips —Filter strips are areas of
native grass or plants created along roadways or
streams. They trap the pollutants stormwater
picks up as it flows across driveways and streets.

Dirt, oil, and debris that collect in
parking lots and paved areas can be
washed into the storm sewer system
and eventually enter local
waterbodies.
• Sweep up litter and debris from
sidewalks, driveways and parking lots,
especially around storm drains.
• Cover grease storage and dumpsters
and keep them clean to avoid leaks.
• Report any chemical spill to the local
hazardous waste cleanup team.

They'll know the best way to keep
spills from harming the environment.

Erosion controls that aren't maintained can cause
excessive amounts of sediment and debris to be
carried into the stormwater system. Construction
vehicles can leak fuel, oil, and other harmful fluids
that can be picked up by stormwater and
deposited into local waterbodies.
• Divert stormwater away from disturbed or
exposed areas of the construction site.
• Install silt fences, vehicle mud removal areas,
vegetative cover, and other sediment and
erosion controls and properly maintain them,
especially after rainstorms.
• Prevent soil erosion by minimizing disturbed
areas during construction projects, and seed
and mulch bare areas as soon as possible.

Lack of vegetation on streambanks can lead to erosion. Overgrazed pastures can also contribute excessive amounts of sediment to local waterbodies. Excess fertilizers and pesticides can poison aquatic animals and lead to destructive algae blooms. Livestock in streams can contaminate waterways with bacteria, making them unsafe for human contact. • Keep livestock away from streambanks and provide
them a water source away from waterbodies.
• Store and apply manure away from waterbodies and in
accordance with a nutrient management plan.
• Vegetate riparian areas along waterways.
• Rotate animal grazing to prevent soil erosion in fields. • Apply fertilizers and pesticides according to label
instructions to save money and minimize pollution.

Improperly managed logging operations can result in erosion and sedimentation.
• Conduct preharvest planning to prevent erosion and lower costs. • Use logging methods and equipment that minimize soil disturbance. • Plan and design skid trails, yard areas, and truck access roads to minimize stream crossings and avoid disturbing the forest floor. • Construct stream crossings so that they minimize erosion and physical changes to streams.
• Expedite revegetation of cleared areas.

Page 743 of 1299 ends

�r
Con tructJb" .

Au motive
rFacikes
'L
Uncovered fueling stations allow spills to be
washed into storm drains. Cars waiting to be
repaired can leak fuel, oil, and other harmful
fluids that can be picked up by stormwater.
• Clean up spills immediately and properly
dispose of cleanup materials.
• Provide cover over fueling stations and
design or retrofit facilities for spill
containment.
• Properly maintain fleet vehicles to prevent
oil, gas, and other discharges from being
washed into local waterbodies.
• Install and maintain oil/water separators.

Landscaping and garden
maintenance activities
can be major contributors to
water pollution. Soils, yard
wastes, over -watering and
garden chemicals become
part of the urban runoff mix
that winds its way through
streets, gutters and storm
drains before entering lakes,
rivers, streams, etc. Urban
runoff pollution contami-
nates water and harms
aquatic life!
In Riverside County, report illegal discharges
into the storm drain, call
1-800-506-2555
"Only Rain Down the Storm Drain"
Important Links:

Riverside County Household Hazardous
Waste Collection Information

1.800.304-2226 or wwa.rivcowm.org
Riverside County Backyard
Composting Program
1 -800 -366 -SAVE
Integrated Pest Management (IPM) Solutions
www.ipm.ucdavis.edu
California Master Gardener Programs
www mastergardeners.org
www.camastergardeners.ucdavis.edu
California Native Plant Society
www.cnps.org
The Riverside County "Only Rain Down the Storm Drain"
Pollution Prevention Program gratefully acknowledges
Orange County's Storm Water Program for their
contribution to this brochure.

Li
,tl
Pa9e �1299
...Only Rain Down
...the Storm Drain
What you should know for...

Landscape and Gardening
Best Management tips for:
• Professionals
• Novices
• Landscapers
• Gardeners
• Cultivators

Tips for Landscape & Gardening
This brochure will help you to get the most
of your lawn and gardening efforts and keep our
waterways clean. Clean waterways provide
recreation, establish thriving fish habitats, secure
safe sanctuaries for wildlife, and add beauty to
our communities. NEVER allow gardening
products or waste water to enter the street,
gutter or storm drain.

General Landscaping Tips
• Protect stockpiles and materials from wind
and rain by storing them under tarps or
secured plastic sheeting.
• Prevent erosion of
slopes by planting fast-
growing, dense ground
covering plants. These
will shield and bind the
soil.
• Plant native vegetation
to reduce the amount
of water, fertilizers and
pesticides applied to
the landscape.
• Never apply pesticides or fertilizers when rain
is predicted within the next 48 hours.

Garden el Lawn Maintenance
• Do not overwater. Use irrigation practices
such as drip irrigation, soaker hoses or micro -
spray systems. Periodically inspect and fix
leaks and misdirected sprinklers.
• Do not rake or blow leaves, clippings or
pruning waste into the street, gutter or storm
drain. Instead, .
dispose of green
waste by com-
posting, hauling
it to a per-
mitted landfill,
or recycling it
through your
city's program.
• Consider recycling your green waste and
adding "nature's own fertilizer" to your lawn
or garden.
• Read labels and use only as directed. Do not
over -apply pesticides or fertilizers. Apply to
spots as needed, rather than blanketing an
entire area.
• Store pesticides, fertilizers and other
chemicals in a dry covered area to prevent
exposure that may result in the deterioration
of containers and packaging.
• Rinse empty pesticide containers and re -use
rinse water as you would use the product.

Do not dump rinse water down storrnn drains
or sewers. Dispose of empty containers in
the trash.
• When available, use non-toxic alternatives to
traditional pesticides, and use pesticides
specifically designed to control the pest you
are targerip ge 745 of 1299
• Try natural long-term common sense
solutions first. Integrated Pest Management
[IPM) can provide landscaping guidance and
solutions, such as:
.0 Physical Controls - Try hand picking,
barriers, traps or caulking holes to
control weeds and pests.
• Biological Controls - Use predatory
insects to control harmful pests.
• Chemical Controls - Check out
www.ipm.ucdavis.edu before using
chemicals. Remember, all chemicals
should be used cautiously and in
moderation.
• If fertilizer is spilled, sweep up the spill before
irrigating. If the spill is liquid, apply an
absorbent material such as cat litter, and then
sweep it up and dispose of it in the trash.
• Take unwanted pesticides to a Household
Waste Collection Center to be recycled.
• Dumping toxics into the street, gutter or
storm drain is illegal!
www.bewaterwise.com Great water
conservation tips and drought tolerant
garden designs.
www.ourwaterourworld.com Learn how to
safely manage home and garden pests.

Additional information can also be found on
the back of this brochure.

Helpful telephone numbers and links:

Do you know where street flows actually go?
Riverside County Stormwater Protection Partners
Flood Control District
County of Riverside
City of Banning
City of Beaumont
City of Calimesa
City of Canyon Lake
Cathedral City
City of Coachella
City of Corona
City of Desert Hot Springs
City of Eastvale
City of Hemet
City of Indian Wells
City of Indio
City of Lake Elsinore
City of La Quinta
City of Menifee
City of Moreno Valley
City of Murrieta
City of Norco
City of Palm Desert
City of Palm Springs
City of Perris
City of Rancho Mirage
City of Riverside
City of San Jacinto
City of Temecula
City of Wildomar
(951) 955-1200
(951) 955-1000
(951) 922-3105
(951) 769-8520
(909) 795-9801
(951) 244-2955
(760) 770-0327
(760) 398-4978
(951) 736-2447
(760) 329-6411
(951) 361-0900
(951) 765-2300
(760) 346-2489
(760) 391-4000
(951) 674-3124
(760) 777-7000
(951) 672-6777
(951) 413-3000
(951) 304-2489
(951) 270-5607
(760) 346-0611
(760) 323-8299
(951) 943-6100
(760) 324-4511
(951) 361-0900
(951) 654-7337
(951) 694-6444
(951) 677-7751

REPORT ILLEGAL STORM DRAIN DISPOSAL
1-800-506.2555 or e-mail us at
fcnpdes (& rcflood. org
• Riverside County Flood Control and Water
Conservation District
www.rcflood.org
Online resources include:
• California Storm Water Quality Association
www.casqa.org
• State Water Resources Control Board
www.waterboards.ca.gov
• Power Washers of North America
wwvv thepwna.org
Storm drains are NOT connected to sanitary sewer systems and treatment plants!

ONLY RAIN IN THE DRAIN
The primary purpose of storm drains is to carry rain water away from developed areas to prevent flooding. Pollutants discharged to storm drains are transported directly into rivers, lakes and streams. Soaps, degreasers, automotive fluids, litter and a host of materials are washed off buildings, sidewalks, plazas and parking areas. Vehicles and equipment must be properly managed to prevent the pollution of local waterways.

Unintentional spills by mobile service operators can flow into storm drains and pollute our waterways. Avoid mishaps. Always have a Spill Response Kit on hand to clean up unintentional spills. Only emergency Mechanical repairs should be done in City streets, using drip pans for spills. Plumbing should be done on private property. Always store chemicals in a leak -proof container and keep covered when not in use. Window/Power Washing waste water shouldn't be released into the streets, but should be disposed of in a sanitary sewer, landscaped area or in the soil. Soiled Carpet Cleaning wash water should be filtered before being discharged into the sanitary sewer. Dispose of all filter debris properly. Car Washing/Detailing operators should wash cars on privto prope ty and use a regulated hose nozzle for water flow control and runoff prevention. Capture and dispose of waste water and chemicals properly.

Remember, storm drains are for receiving rain water runoff only.

REPORT ILLEGAL

STORM DRAIN

DISPOSAL
1-800-506-2555
• - • - A . .
••

Ileli, Prolecl Our Waterways!
Use these guidelines for Outdoor Cleaning Activities and Wash Water Disposal Did you know that disposing of
pollutants into the street, gutter,
storm drain or body of water is
PROHIBITED by law and can result
in stiff penalties?
Best Management Practices
Waste wash water from Mechanics, Plumbers,
Window/Power Washers, Carpet Cleaners, Car
Washing and Mobile Detailing activities may
contain significant quantities of motor oil, grease,
chemicals, dirt, detergents, brake pad dust, litter
and other materials.

Best Management Practices, or BMPs as they are
known, are guides to prevent pollutants from
entering the storm drains. Each of us can do our
part to keep stormwater clean by using the
suggested BMPs below:

Simple solutions for both
light and heavy duty jobs:

DO...consider dry cleaning methods first such
as a mop, broom, rag or wire brush. Always keep
a spill response kit on site.

DO...prepare the work area before power
cleaning by using sand bags, rubber mats, vacuum
booms, containment pads or temporary berms to
keep wash water away from the gutters and storm
drains.

DO...use vacuums or other machines to
remove and collect loose debris or litter before
applying water.

DO...obtain the property owner's permission to
dispose of small amounts of power washing waste
water on to landscaped, gravel or unpaved
surfaces.

DO...check your local sanitary sewer agency's
policies on wash water disposal regulations before
disposing of wash water into the sewer. (See list
on reverse side)
DO...be aware that if discharging to landscape
areas, soapy wash water may damage landscaping.

Residual wash water may remain on paved
surfaces to evaporate. Sweep up solid residuals
and dispose of properly. Vacuum booms are
another option for capturing and collecting wash
water.

DO...check to see if local ordinances prevent
certain activities.

Do not let...wash or waste water from
sidewalk, plaza or building cleaning go into a
street or storm drain.

Report illegal storm drain disposal
Call Toll Free
1-800-506-2555
Using Cleaning Agents
Try using biodegradable/phosphate-free products.

They are easier on the environment, but don't
confuse them with being toxic free. Soapy water
entering the storm drain system can impact the
delicate aquatic environment.

When cleaning surfaces with a high-pressure
washer or steam cleaner, additional precautions
should be taken to prevent the discharge of
pollutants into the storm drain system. These
two methods of surface cleaning can loosen
additional material that can contaminate local
waterways.

Think Water Conservation
Minimize water use by using high pressure, low
volume nozzles. Be sure to check all hoses for
leaks. Water is a precious resource, don't let it flow
freely and be sure to shut it off in between uses.

Pane 747 of 12 (49
Screening Wash Water
Conduct thorough dry cleanup before washing
exterior surfaces, such as buildings and decks
with loose paint, sidewalks or plaza areas. Keep
debris from entering the storm drain after
cleaning by first passing the wash water through
a "20 mesh" or finer screen to catch the solid
materials, then dispose of the mesh in a refuse
container. Do not let the remaining wash water
enter a street, gutter or storm drain.

Drain Inlet Protection &
Collection of Wash Water
• Prior to any washing, block all storm drains
with an impervious barrier such as sandbags
or berms, or seal the storm drain with plugs
or other appropriate materials.
• Create a containment area with berms and
traps or take advantage of a low spot to keep
wash water contained.
• Wash vehicles and equipment on grassy or
gravel areas so that the wash water can seep
into the ground.
• Pump or vacuum up all wash water in the
contained area.

Concrete/Coring/Saw Cutting
and Drilling Projects
Protect any down -gradient inlets by using dry
activity techniques whenever possible. If water is
used, minimize the amount of water used during
the coring/drilling or saw cutting process. Place a
barrier of sandbags and/or absorbent berms to
protect the storm drain inlet or watercourse. Use a
shovel or wet vacuum to remove the residue from
the pavement. Do not wash residue or particulate
matter into a storm drain inlet or watercourse.

Your community deserves waterways free from trash and other pollutants.

As a California State Water Board certified trash capture device, thousands of StormTek devices are already in the field, helping to keep waterways clear.

HIGHLIGHTS:
✓ Quick, seamless installation
✓ Easy cleaning and maintenance
✓ Fits a variety of catch basin sizes & shapes
✓ Allows use of up to 90% of the catch basin vault
/ Industry -leading 5 -year warranty
Trusted by numerous cities, counties and major corporations efr ailfrarrs
�T
CALIFOANA PAkTAMO OP ikaHYPOPTRTbM
amazon
Go•cgle
The City of
DIEGO.) SAC RA l'91PNITO1 ENTURA

CITY OF
o, il` %3

SAN JOSE

CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY

StormTek
Trash capture
made easy
1 SCHEDULE A

CONSULTATION
No -cost consultation
with one of our trash
capture experts
W1MS
Storm Water Inspection &
Maintenance Services
fi t0W STORMTEK MAKES
:TRASH CAPTURE EASY
✓ FITS IN EXISTING INFRASTRUCTURE
StormTek attaches to the existing catch
basin wall in front of the outflow pipe.
✓ BUILT TO LAST
Made from heavy gauge stainless steel,
StormTek units are built to last for decades.
✓ VERSATILE
Fabricated to meet a wide variety of catch
basin outflow pipe sizes and shapes.
v DESIGNED FOR COMPLIANCE
Meets even the rigorous California
State Water Board requirements.
✓ EASY TO INSTALL AND MAINTAIN
Simple to install, remove, clean and replace.

HOW TO GET STARTED
2 RECEIVE A QUOTE 3 CAPTURE TRASH!
Review our Follow our detailed
no -obligation proposal instructions, to install
for customized your StormTek devices.

StormTek devices.

Page 749 of 1299 ends

P.O. Box 1627
Discovery Bay, CA 94505
(866) 967-9467
www.Sto rmTe kC lea n.com

BAUME ONTA -C A L I F O R N I
Staff Report
TO: City Council
FROM: Carole Kendrick, Interim Community Development Director DATE October 1, 2024
SUBJECT: Second Reading of Vector Control Ordinance (PLAN2024-0100) Description Second reading regarding the adoption of Riverside County Ordinance No. 523 by reference, adding Chapter 8.56 (Riverside County Ordinance No. 523 Control of Vectors) to the Beaumont Municipal Code.

Background and Analysis:

The City of Beaumont traditionally utilizes the County of Riverside, Department of Environmental Health to provide vector control services including mosquito surveillance and control, and advice on other vectors. A memorandum of understanding (MOU) between the Riverside County Department of Environmental Health and the City of Beaumont was approved by the City Council on June 20, 2023.

The County's performance on the MOU is contingent on the County of Riverside having adequate legal authority and jurisdiction to perform the services, which requires the adoption of the Riverside County Code 8.36 (Control of Vectors). Staff has prepared a draft Ordinance to adopt by reference Riverside County Code 8.36 (shown as Attachment B), as provided in Attachment A.

The proposed ordinance amendment is drafted in Title 8 — Health and Safety section of the Beaumont Municipal Code. Title 8 includes nuisances, regulation of abandoned residential properties, and other chapters related to protecting public health and safety.

Chapter 8.56 will add to Title 8 to address the control of vectors.

At the September 17, 2024, City Council meeting, the City Council approved PLAN2024-0100 by a vote of 3-0.

CEQA:

The City has analyzed this proposed project and has determined that is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines, which provides that CEQA only applies to projects that have the

Page 750 of 1299 ends

potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. The proposed ordinance in itself does not relate to any physical project and will not result in any physical change to the environment and does not affect the land use or density limitations of the General Plan. Therefore, it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that this ordinance may have a significant adverse effect on the environment, and therefore, the adoption of this ordinance is exempt from CEQA pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines.

Public Communications Received:

A 10 -day public notice was placed in the Press Enterprise on September 6, 2024. At the time of report preparation for the first reading, the Planning Department has not received any letters of comment from the public in favor or opposition to the project.

Fiscal Impact:

The cost to prepare this staff report and related materials is approximately $150.

Recommended Action:

Waive the second full reading and adopt by title only, "An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Beaumont, California Adding Chapter 8.56 `Control of Vectors' to the Beaumont Municipal Code Adopting by Reference Riverside County Ordinance No. 523, as Amended through 523.3 'An Ordinance of the County of Riverside Relating to the Control of Vectors and Incorporating by Reference Ordinance No 75,' Codified as Chapter 8.36 (Control of Vectors') Et Seq. of Riverside County Code of Ordinances".

Attachments:

A. Draft Ordinance
B. Exhibit A Riverside County Ordinance No. 523 "Control of Vectors" C. Proof of Publication

Page 751 of 1299 ends

ORDINANCE NO.

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BEAUMONT, CALIFORNIA ADDING CHAPTER 8.56 "CONTROL OF VECTORS," OF THE

BEAUMONT MUNICIPAL CODE ADOPTING BY REFERENCE RIVERSIDE COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 523, AS AMENDED THROUGH 523.3, "AN ORDINANCE OF THE

COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE RELATING TO THE CONTROL OF VECTORS AND INCORPORATING BY REFERENCE ORDINANCE NO. 725", CODIFIED AS CHAPTER 8.36 ("CONTROL OF VECTORS") ET SEQ. OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY CODE OF ORDINANCES.

BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BEAUMONT, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA AS FOLLOWS:

WHEREAS, the City of Beaumont and Riverside County, Department of Environmental Health, entered into that certain Memorandum of Understanding having approved by the City Council on June 20, 2023 ("MOU"). In relevant part, the MOU provides that the City shall adopt Riverside County Ordinance No. 523, codified in Chapter 8.36 et. Seq. of the Riverside County Code of Ordinances; and WHEREAS, the County of Riverside ("County") represents it has duly adopted Ordinance No. 523, as amended through 523.3, an "Ordinance of the County of Riverside Relating to the Control of Vectors and Incorporating by Reference Ordinance No. 725," (collectively "Ordinance No. 523") which generally consists of regulations regarding control of vectors; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the MOU, the County has agreed to provide vector control services within jurisdictional boundaries of the City, that include mosquito surveillance and control, and fly, rodent, and cockroach advice. Community awareness, public presentations, consultations, and public education with flyers and booklets can also be provided upon request; and
WHEREAS, County will submit quarterly itemized billings, and the City will pay County at the rate in Riverside Ordinance No. 640 for the cost of specific services rendered within City boundaries, for the five (5) year MOU term, unless otherwise agreed between City and County. Any applicable administrative citations amounts charged by County against City residents and/or businesses for any actions taken by County will be used to offset amounts charged to City, less the cost of processing the citation; and
WHEREAS, City staff has recommended that the City incorporate by reference County Ordinance No. 523 into Chapter 8.56 of the Beaumont Municipal Code, as set forth herein; and
WHEREAS, the MOU further provides that County shall provide environmental planning review, technical assistance, and plan review for onsite wastewater treatment

Page 752 of 1299 ends

systems in accordance with Riverside County Local Agency Management Program; that City shall enact regulations to allow for billing of fees by County for said services to be rendered, according to Riverside County Ordinance No. 640; and City will enact necessary ordinances to allow County to directly bill any applicant for applicable services; and
WHEREAS, the County of Riverside ("County") represents it has duly adopted an "Ordinance of the County of Riverside Amending Ordinance No. 640 Establishing Environmental Health Services Fees" (as amended through 640.10) (collectively "Ordinance No. 640"), codified in Chapter 4.52 ("Environmental Health Services Fees" of Riverside County Code; and

NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BEAUMONT DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. CEQA. The City Council finds that the actions contemplated by this Ordinance are exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") pursuant to 15061(b)(3), CEQA review is not required because there is no possibility that this Ordinance may have a significant effect upon the environment and the proposed text amendments constitute a minor alteration in a land use limitation under CEQA Guidelines Section 15305, and such a land use limitation is a permissible exercise of the City's zoning powers.

SECTION 2. Severability. The City Council hereby declares that if any provision, section, paragraph, sentence, or word of this Ordinance is rendered or declared to be invalid or unconstitutional by any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction, or by reason of any preemptive legislation, such invalidity shall not affect the other provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences, or words of this Ordinance, and to this end the provisions of this Ordinance are severable. The City Council declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance irrespective of the invalidity of any particular portion thereof and intends that the invalid portions should be severed and the balance of the Ordinance enforced.

SECTION 3. Prosecution of Prior Ordinances. Neither the adoption of this Ordinance nor the repeal of any other ordinance of this City shall in any manner affect the prosecution of any violation of any City ordinance or provision of the City of Beaumont Municipal Code, committed prior to the effective date hereof, nor be construed as a waiver of any penalty or the penal provisions applicable to any violation thereof.

SECTION 4. The City Council hereby amends Title 8, Chapter 8.56, entitled "Control of Vectors" to Beaumont Municipal Code, to read as specifically set forth in Exhibit "A" which Exhibit is attached hereto and made a part thereof. 2

Page 753 of 1299 ends

SECTION 5. Effective Date and Publication. The Mayor shall sign and the City Clerk shall certify to the passage of this Ordinance and cause the same or a summary thereof to be published within 15 days after adoption in accordance with Government Code Section 36933. This Ordinance shall take effect 30 days after adoption in accordance with Government Code Section 36937.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED that the City Council of the City of Beaumont, California, approves an amendment to the City Code.

INTRODUCED AND READ for the first time and ordered posted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Beaumont, California, held on the 17th day of September 2024, by the following roll call vote:

AYES:

NOES
ABSENT

ABSTAIN
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Beaumont, California, held on the 1st day of October, 2024.

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

David Fenn, Mayor
Attest:

City Clerk
Approved as to form:

John O. Pinkney, City Attorney
3

Page 754 of 1299 ends

Exhibit A
4

Page 755 of 1299 ends

ORDINANCE NO. 523
(AS AMENDED THROUGH 523.3)

AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE

RELATING TO THE CONTROL OF VECTORS AND
INCORPORATING BY REFERENCE ORDINANCE NO. 725
The Board of Supervisors of the County of Riverside, State of California, do ordain as follows:

Section 1. DEFINITIONS.
"ENFORCEMENT OFFICER" and "OFFICER" mean the Director of Environmental Health and his or her duly authorized designees. "PERSON" means any person, corporation, partnership, firm, or legal representative.
"VECTOR" means any animal capable of transmitting the causative agent of human disease or capable of producing human discomfort or injury, including, but not limited to mosquitoes, flies, ticks, bees, wasps, other arthropods, rodents and other vertebrates.
"VECTOR BREEDING HAZARD" means the accumulation, existence or maintenance of any substance, matter, material, or condition known to cause the existence or breeding of vectors in an amount or manner such as to endanger the public health or safety, or to create a public nuisance.

Section 2. On property owned or under their control, no person shall create conditions or permit the accumulation of solid debris, standing water, decaying animal, decaying vegetable or organic matter, excreta from domestic animals or fowls, human excreta, or any other potential harborage for vectors in such a manner as to cause, or known to cause, a vector breeding hazard or the occurrence of excessive vectors. The determination of the presence of excessive vectors or a vector breeding hazard shall be made by the Enforcement Officer. The presence of excessive vectors on the property shall be prima facie evidence that an adverse public health/well-being hazard exists. The person claiming ownership, title, and/or control of the property shall be responsible for the abatement of the vector breeding hazard and any excessive vectors.

Section 3. Pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure section 1822.50 et seq., and Riverside County Ordinance 725, the Enforcement Officer shall have the authority to enforce this ordinance and shall have the right to enter upon lands other than buildings or dwellings for the purpose of enforcing this ordinance. The Enforcement officer shall make all reasonable attempts to gain voluntary compliance to enter onto the land/property. Entry onto said land/property shall occur for the following reasons:
(a) Conduct surveillance programs and other appropriate studies of vectors and vector borne diseases.

Page 756 of 1299 ends

(b) Take any and all necessary or proper actions to prevent the occurrence of vectors and vector borne diseases.
(c) Take any and all necessary or proper actions to abate or control vectors and vector borne diseases so as to minimize the spread of disease from any premises.
(d) Abate a public nuisance, as defined in Section 2 of Riverside County Ordinance 725.

Section 4. Any person who restrains, hinders, obstructs, or threatens the Enforcement Officer in the performance of that person's duties, or any person who interferes with any work done by, or under the direction of, the Enforcement Officer is guilty of a misdemeanor.

Section 5. Nothing contained in this ordinance shall be construed to authorize any person to maintain a public or private nuisance, or to prevent any proceeding for abatement thereof.

Section 6. ADMINISTRATIVE CITATIONS AND PENALTIES: In addition to the remedies and penalties contained in this Ordinance, and in accordance with California Government Code Section 53069.4, and as may be amended, an administrative citation may be issued for any violation of this Ordinance. The following procedures shall govern the imposition, enforcement, collection and administrative review of administrative citations and penalties.

A. Notice of Violation. If the violation is not corrected within the period stated in the notice of violation, or if the violation creates an immediate danger to health or safety, an administrative citation may be issued by the Enforcement Officer.

B. Content of Citation. The administrative citation shall be issued on a form approved by County Counsel and shall contain the information listed below. The failure of the citation to set forth all required contents shall not affect the validity of the proceedings.

1. Date, location and approximate time the violation was observed.

2. The Ordinance section violated and a brief description of the violation.

3. The amount of the administrative penalty imposed for the violation.

4. The corrective actions that need to be taken.

5. Instructions for the payment of the penalty, the time period by which it shall be paid, and the consequences of failure to pay the penalty within this time period.

6. Instructions on how to appeal the citation.

7. The signature of the Enforcement Officer.

C. Service of Citation.

1. If the property owner or other authorized person who has violated the Ordinance is present at the scene of the violation, the Enforcement Officer shall attempt to obtain their signature on the administrative citation and shall deliver a copy of the administrative citation to them. A copy will be mailed to the property owner if the person receiving the administrative citation is not the property owner.

Page 757 of 1299 ends

2. If the property owner or other authorized person who has violated the Ordinance cannot be located at the property, then the administrative citation shall be posted in a conspicuous place on or near the property and a copy mailed by certified mail, return receipt requested, to the property owner and/or other authorized person who has violated the Ordinance. The citation shall be mailed to the property address and/or the address listed for the owner on the last County Equalized Assessment Roll.

3. The failure of any interested person to receive the citation shall not affect the validity of the proceedings.

D. Administrative Penalties.

1. The penalties assessed for each violation shall not exceed the following amounts:
a. $100.00 for a first violation;
b. $200.00 for a second violation of this Ordinance within one (1) year from the date of the first violation; and
c. $500.00 for each additional violation of this Ordinance within one (1) year from the date of the first violation.

2. If the violation is not corrected, additional administrative citations may be issued for the same violation. The amount of the penalty shall increase at the rate specified in Section 6.D.1., above.

3. Payment of the penalty shall not excuse the failure to correct the violation nor shall it bar further enforcement action.

4. The penalties assessed shall be payable to the County of Riverside.

E. Administrative Appeal.

1. Notice of Appeal. The recipient of an administrative citation may appeal the citation by filing a written notice of appeal with the Department. The written notice of appeal must be filed within (20) days of the service of the administrative citation. Failure to file a written notice of appeal within this time period shall constitute a waiver of the right to appeal the administrative citation. The notice of appeal shall contain the following information:
a. A brief statement setting forth the appellant's interest in the proceedings;
b. A brief statement of the material facts which the appellant claims support the contention that no administrative penalty should be imposed or that an administrative penalty of a different amount is warranted;
c. An address at which the appellant agrees notice of any additional proceeding or an order relating the imposition of the administrative penalty may be received by mail.
d. The notice of appeal must be signed under penalty of perjury by the appellant.

2. Administrative Hearing. Upon a timely written request by the recipient of the administrative citation, an administrative hearing shall be held as follows:
a. Notice of Hearing. Notice of the administrative hearing shall be given at least (10) days before the hearing to the person requesting the

Page 758 of 1299 ends

hearing. The notice may be delivered to the person or may be mailed to the address listed in the notice of appeal.
b. Hearing Officer. The administrative hearing shall be held before the Board of Supervisors, the County Hearing Officer or the County Hearing Board. The hearing officer shall not be the Enforcement Officer who issued the administrative citation or said Enforcement Officer's immediate supervisor or subordinate. The Board of Supervisors, the County Hearing Officer or the County Hearing Board may contract with a qualified provider to conduct administrative hearings or to process administrative citations.
c. Conduct of the Hearing. Except as may be required by the Hearing Officer, the Enforcement Officer who issued the administrative citation is not required to participate in the administrative hearing. The contents of the Enforcement Officer's file in the case shall be admitted as prima facie evidence of the facts stated therein. The Hearing Officer shall not be limited by the technical rules of evidence. If the person requesting the appeal fails to appear at the administrative hearing, the Hearing Officer shall make his or her determination based on the information contained in the notice of appeal and the underlying administrative citation.
d. Hearing Officer's Decision. The Hearing Officer's decision following the administrative hearing shall be delivered to the person requesting the hearing personally or sent by mail. The Hearing Officer may allow payment of the administrative penalty in installments, if the person provides evidence satisfactory to the Hearing Officer of an inability to pay the penalty in full. The Hearing Officer's decision shall contain instructions for obtaining review of the decision by the superior court.

F. Review of Administrative Hearing Officer's Decision.

1. Notice of Appeal. Within twenty (20) days of the date of the delivery or mailing of the hearing officer's decision, a person may contest that decision by filing an appeal to be heard by the Superior Court. The fee for filing the notice of appeal is twenty-five dollars ($25.00). The failure to file the written appeal and to pay the court filing fee within this period shall constitute a waiver of the right to an appeal and the decision shall be deemed confirmed. A copy of the notice of appeal shall be served in person or by first class mail upon the issuing agency by the contestant.

2. Conduct of Hearing. The conduct of the appeal is a subordinate judicial duty and may be performed by traffic trial commissioners and other subordinate judicial officials at the direction of the presiding judge of the court. The appeal shall be heard de novo, except that the contents of the issuing agency's file in the case shall be received in evidence. A copy of the document or instrument of the issuing agency providing notice of the violation and imposition of the administrative penalty shall be admitted into evidence as prima facie evidence of the facts stated therein. The court shall request that the issuing agency's file on the case be forwarded to the court, to be received within fifteen (15) days of the request.

Page 759 of 1299 ends

3. Judgment. The court shall retain the twenty-five dollar ($25.00) filing fee regardless of the outcome of the appeal. If the court finds in favor of the contestant, the amount of the fine or penalty shall be reimbursed to the contestant by the local agency. Any deposit of the fine or penalty shall be refunded by the issuing agency in accordance with the judgment of the court.

If the fine or penalty has not been deposited and the decision of the court is against the contestant, the issuing agency may proceed to collect the penalty pursuant to the procedures set forth in this Ordinance, or in any other manner provided by law.

Section 7. SUMMARY ABATEMENT. Pursuant to California Government Code Section 25845(a), and as may be amended, the Enforcement Officer is authorized to summarily abate public nuisances determined by the Officer to constitute an immediate threat to public health, safety or welfare. If an Enforcement Officer summarily abates a public nuisance, he may keep an account of the abatement costs and pursue cost recovery pursuant to Section 10 of this Ordinance. In cases of summary abatement, however, at the hearing to confirm the abatement costs, the Administrative Hearing Officer shall also determine whether a public nuisance existed.

Section 8. CRIMINAL PENALTIES. Any person who neglects or refuses to abate a condition found by the Enforcement Officer to be in violation of this Ordinance within the time specified in a written notice shall be in violation of the provisions of this ordinance and shall be deemed guilty of an infraction or misdemeanor as hereinafter specified. Such person(s) shall be deemed guilty of a separate offense for each and every day or portion thereof during which any violation of any of the provisions of this ordinance is committed, continued, or permitted. Any person deemed guilty of violating this ordinance shall be: (1) guilty of an infraction offense and punished by a fine not exceeding one hundred dollars ($100.00) for a first violation; (2) guilty of an infraction offense and punished by a fine not exceeding two hundred dollars ($200.00) for a second violation on the same site. (3) The third and any additional violations on the same site shall constitute an infraction or a misdemeanor offense and shall be punishable by a fine not exceeding one thousand dollars ($1,000.00) or six (6) months in jail, or both. Notwithstanding the above, a first and a second violation may be charged and prosecuted as a misdemeanor. Payment of any penalty herein shall not relieve an individual from the responsibility for correcting the violation.

Section 9. CIVIL ACTIONS
A. Injunctive Relief and Abatement. Whenever, in the judgment of the Enforcement Officer, any person is engaged in any act or practice which constitutes or will constitute a violation of any provision of this Ordinance, or any rule, regulation, order, permit or conditions of approval issued thereunder, upon the request of the Enforcement Officer, the County Counsel or District Attorney may commence proceedings for the abatement, removal, correction and enjoinment thereof, and require the violator to pay civil penalties and/or abatement costs.

B. Civil Remedies and Penalties. Any person, whether acting as principal, agent, employee, owner, lessor, lessee, tenant, occupant, operator, contractor or

Page 760 of 1299 ends

otherwise, who willfully violates the provisions of this Ordinance or any rule, regulation, order or conditions of approval issued thereunder, shall be liable for a civil penalty not to exceed $1,000.00 for each day or portion thereof, that the violation continues to exist. In determining the amount of the civil penalty to impose, the court shall consider all relevant circumstances, including, but not limited to, the extent of the harm caused by the conduct constituting a violation, the nature and persistence of such conduct, the length of time over which the conduct occurred, the assets, liabilities, and net worth of the violator, whether corporate or individual, and any corrective action taken by the violator.

Section 10. ABATEMENT COSTS AND DAMAGES. Any person, whether acting as a principal, agent, employee, owner, lessor, lessee, tenant, occupant, operator or contractor, or otherwise, violating any provisions of this Ordinance or the rules, regulations, orders, permits or conditions of approval issued thereunder, shall be liable to the County of Riverside for costs of abatement, including attorney's fees, and any damages suffered by the County, its agents and agencies, as a result of such violations, following the procedure outlined in Ordinance 725, and as may be amended.

Section 11. RECOVERY OF ATTORNEYS' FEES IN NUISANCE ABATEMENT CASES.

In any action, administrative proceeding, or special proceeding to abate a nuisance pursuant to this Ordinance attorneys' fees may be recovered by the prevailing party. In no action, administrative proceeding, or special proceeding shall an award of attorneys' fees to a prevailing party exceed the amount of reasonable attorneys' fees incurred by the County in the action or proceeding.

Section 12. RECORDATION OF NOTICES IN ABATEMENT PROCEEDINGS.

A. NOTICE OF PENDENCY.

1. Whenever the County institutes a judicial action or proceeding to enforce this Ordinance, a Notice of Pendency ("Notice") of the action or proceeding may be filed with the County Recorder's Office. The Notice may be filed at the time of the commencement of the action or proceeding and upon recordation of the Notice, shall have the same effect as a notice recorded in compliance with Section 405.20 et seq. of the California Code of Civil Procedure, and as amended.

2. Upon motion of a party to the judicial action or proceeding, the Notice of Pendency may be vacated upon an appropriate showing of need therefore by an order of a judge of the Court in which the action or proceeding is pending.

B. NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS.

1. Whenever a Notice of Violation has issued pursuant to this Ordinance, the Enforcement Officer may record a Notice of Pendency of Administrative Proceedings with the Office of the County Recorder and shall notify the owner of the property of such action.

2. The Notice of Pendency of Administrative Proceedings shall describe the real property, shall set forth the non -complying conditions, and shall state that all current or subsequent owners of the property may be liable for abatement costs pertaining to any violation of this ordinance and that the abatement

Page 761 of 1299 ends

costs may be affixed as a lien and special tax assessment on the real property.

3. A Release of Notice of Pendency of Administrative Proceedings may be recorded after the Enforcement Officer has confirmed that each violation described in the Notice of Pendency of Administrative Proceedings has been abated and all related abatement costs have been reimbursed to the County.

C. NOTICE OF NON COMPLIANCE. Any Notice of Non Compliance issued or recorded by the Enforcement Officer in abatement proceedings prior to the effective date of this Ordinance Amendment shall remain in full force and effect.

Section 13. REMEDIES AND PENALTIES. All remedies and penalties provided for herein shall be cumulative and not exclusive. The conviction and punishment of any person hereunder shall not relieve such person from the responsibility of correcting removing or abating the violation, nor prevent the enforced correction, removal or abatement thereof.

Each and every day during any portion of which any violation of this Ordinance or the rules, regulations, orders, Permits or conditions of approval issued thereunder is committed, continued, or permitted by such person, shall be deemed a separate and distinct offense.

Section 14. SEVERABILITY. If any provision, clause, sentence or paragraph of this Ordinance or the application thereof to any person or circumstances shall be held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect the other provisions or applications of the provisions of this Ordinance which can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end, the provisions of this Ordinance are hereby declared to be severable.

Section 15. EFFECTIVE DATE. The ordinance shall take effect 30 days after its adoption.

Adopted: 523 03/30/1970 (Eff: 04/29/1970)
Amended: 523.1 Item 3.6 of 08/01/1989 (Eff: 08/31/1989) 523.2 Item 15.7 of 05/22/2007 (Eff: 06/21/2007)
523.3 Item 3.35 of 04/11/2017 (Eff: 05/11/2017)

Page 762 of 1299 ends

LEGAL ADVERTISEMENT
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the City of Beaumont will conduct public hearings to consider the matter described below. The City Council's public hearing will held at 6:00 p.m. on Tuesday, September 17, 2024, at 550 East Sixth Street, Beaumont, California.

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE

CITY OF BEAUMONT, CALIFORNIA
ADDING CHAPTER 8.56 "CONTROL OF VECTORS," OF

THE BEAUMONT MUNICIPAL CODE
The purpose and intent of this addition is to provide control measures and processes for the control of vectors in the municipal code.

This meeting will be conducted utilizing teleconference communications and will be recorded for live streaming. All City of Beaumont public meetings will be made available via live streaming and made available on the City's official YouTube webpage. Please use the following link during the meeting for live stream access:

BeaumontCa.gov/Livestream
Public comments can be made in person, using the public comment phone line or by written email. Phone-in comments will be accepted by calling the designated public comment phone line (951) 922- 4845 prior to the corresponding item. Public comments shall not exceed three minutes unless otherwise authorized by City Council.

Written comments can be emailed to [email protected] Public comments accepted via email will be read aloud during the corresponding item of the meeting. Comments can be submitted any time prior to the meeting as well as during the meeting until the end of the corresponding item.

BeaumontCa.gov/Livestream
Carole Kendrick Page 763 of 1299
Interim Community Development Director
The Press -Enterprise
Published: 9/6/24

BAUME ONTA -C A L I F O R N I
Staff Report
TO: City Council
FROM: Nicole Wheelwright, Deputy City Clerk
DATE October 1, 2024
SUBJECT: Establishment of a 2x2x2 Ad Hoc Meeting with the Cities of Banning and Calimesa
Description Ad Hoc Meeting to Discuss Truck Routes.

Background and Analysis:

At its September 3, 2024, meeting, City Council had a consensus to establish a 2x2x2 Ad Hoc with the cities of Banning and Calimesa to discuss truck routes. This item is intended to confirm the selection of Mayor Pro Tem Lara and Council Member Voigt as the appointed members. City Manager Gibbs has reached out to the City Managers of each city and they have communicated that they will be taking this request of an Ad Hoc to their City Council Meetings this month.

Fiscal Impact:

The cost to prepare this report is estimated to be $75.00.

Recommended Action:

Confirm appointed representatives, Mayor Pro Tem Lara and Council Member Voigt and direct staff to contact the cities of Banning and Calimesa.

Page 764 of 1299 ends

BAUME ONTA -C A L I F O R N I
Staff Report
TO: City Council
FROM: Jennifer Ustation, Finance Director
DATE October 1, 2024
SUBJECT: Adoption of Development Impact Fee Nexus Study and Development Impact Fee Schedule
Description Hold two public hearings for the proposed adoption of the 2024 Development Impact Fee Nexus Study and Development Impact Fee Schedule.

Background and Analysis:

A development impact fee (DIF), also known as a public facilities fee, is imposed to mitigate the impact of development on the community. Development impact fees must have an "essential nexus" to the government's land -use interest and "rough proportionality" to the development's impact on the land -use interest.

A city imposes public facilities fees under authority granted by the Mitigation Fee Act (the Act), contained in California Government Code Sections 66000 et seq. When imposing such a fee, a local agency must make certain specific findings as outlined by the Act. As a basis for such findings, local agencies typically prepare a fee study.

On January 1, 2022, new requirements went into effect for California jurisdictions implementing impact fees. Among other changes, AB 602 added Section 66016.5 to the Government Code, which set guidelines for impact fee nexus studies. Four key requirements from that section which concern the nexus study are reproduced here:
66016.5. (a) (2) When applicable, the nexus study shall identify the existing level of service for each public facility, identify the proposed new level of service, and include an explanation of why the new level of service is appropriate. 66016.5. (a) (4) If a nexus study supports the increase of an existing fee, the local agency shall review the assumptions of the nexus study supporting the original fee and evaluate the amount of fees collected under the original fee. 66016.5. (a) (5) A nexus study adopted after July 1, 2022, shall calculate a fee imposed on a housing development project proportionately to the square footage of proposed

Page 765 of 1299 ends

units of the development. A local agency that imposes a fee proportionately to the square footage of proposed units of the development shall be deemed to have used a valid method to establish a reasonable relationship between the fee charged and the burden posed by the development.
66016.5. (a) (6) Large jurisdictions shall adopt a capital improvement plan as a part of the nexus study. Large jurisdictions are defined as cities with populations of over 250,000 residents.

Finally, AB 602 requires that the DIF Nexus Studies be updated every eight years.

Development Impact Fee Nexus Study Update
On November 21, 2017, the City Council adopted the 2017 DIF Nexus Study. Since the 2017 DIF Nexus Study, the city has seen significant increases in construction costs and significant city growth, and since that time, has adopted the 2040 General Plan update, and the City Council's 2023 Strategic Plan. Consequently, the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) has expanded in cost and projects to maintain the city's level of service for existing and future development.

On August 15, 2023, the City Council approved a Professional Services Agreement (PSA) with Wildan Financial Services to work with city staff to complete the 2024 DIF Nexus study.

The public facilities and improvements included in the analysis are divided into the fee categories listed below:

Parks
Recycled Water
Recreation Facilities
General Plan
Fire Protection Facilities
*Library District
Police Facilities
Emergency Preparedness Facilities
Public Facilities
*Storm Drain
Transportation Facilities
*Trails
Sewer Facilities
*Maintenance Equipment
Sewer Capacity
*New proposed fees
Compliance with AB 602
Pursuant to State law, the 2024 DIF Nexus Study does the following: 1) identifies the purpose of each DIF; 2) identifies the use to which each DIF is to be put; 3) identifies all

Page 766 of 1299 ends

public facilities that will be financed by the respective DIF; 4) determines how there is a reasonable relationship between each DIF's use and the type of development project on which the respective DIF is imposed; and 5) determines how there is a reasonable relationship between the need for the public facility and the type of development project on which the particular DIF is imposed.

Capital Improvement Plan (CIP)
AB602 requires large jurisdictions to adopt a CIP as part of the DIF Nexus study. The 2024 DIF Nexus Study was developed using prior -year and active CIPs with all projects related to the fees included within the Nexus Study.

Initial Report
On April 30, 2024, City staff held a webinar and invited the development community to go over the results of the Nexus Study.

On May 7, 2024, the City Council held a public hearing to review the first draft of the Nexus study. The hearing was continued to allow time for the City to host webinars with the development community to go over the Nexus Study results.

On June 5, 2024, City staff held an in -person meeting with the development community to go over the nexus study.

On June 18, 2024, the city held the continued public hearing. The public hearing was closed, and it was noted it would be brought back later after certain items had been completed.

Development Impact Fee Schedule Summary
The initial study that was presented on May 7, 2024, and June 18, 2024, had an estimate of total development at the 2040 planning horizon as an indicator of future demand to determine total facilities needed to accommodate growth and remedy existing facility deficiencies and is included in the redlined updated study as Attachment E. The table below is the Maximum Justified Development Impact Fee Schedule from the initial study.

Page 767 of 1299 ends

E.1: Maximum Justified Development Impact Fee Schedule - per Square Foot Land Use
Residential
Dwelling
Unit Commercial
Industrial/
Business Park
Industrial/
High -Cube
Warehouse
Park Land In Lieu {Subdivisions)'
Park Land Acquisition (Non Subdirisions)2
Community Park Improvements
Neighborhood Park Improvements
Recreation Facilities
Fire Protection Facilities
Police Facilities
Public Facilities
Transportation Facilities
Sewer Facilities
Sewer Capacity3
Recycled Water
General Plan
Library District
Emergency Preparedness Facilities
Storm Drain
Trails
Maintenance Equipment
Total (Subdivisions)
Total (In51i)
$ 0.79 5 5 5

0.77 0.53 - - -

0.59 1.12 -

0.38 0.47 0.68 0.19

1.33 0.73 1.06 0.30

0.60 0.33 0.48 0.14

2.61 26.23 11.86 1.65

2.57 1.34 0.99 2.06

4.72 1.80 3.33 2.29

0.32 0.17 0.12 0.26

0.02 0.01 0.02 0.01

0.15 -

0.01 0.004 0.006 0.002

0.92 0.97 0.75 0.97

0.02 au 0.010 0.010 0.004
$ 16.70 $ 32.06 5 19.31 $ 7.88
$ 16.68 5 32.06 5 19.31 $ 7.88
Fee in lieu of parkland dedication charged under the Quirrby Act.

Fee for parkland acquisition charged under the Mtgation Fee Act. "Cormercial medium strength" fee show n for corrmercial.-hdustnal high strength" lee show n for industrial/busness park "Industrial low strength -fee shown for industrial/high cube warehouse. Refer to Table 10.5 for full sewer capacity nonresidential fee Sources: Tables 3.8.4.7. 5.7.6.7. 7.7. 8.5, 9.5. 10.4, 10.5. 11.3, 12.5. 13.6, 14.5. 15.6. 16.7 and 17.7.

Changes from the Initial Development Impact Fee Nexus Study The City Council gave staff the following direction regarding the study at the June 18, 2024, City Council meeting:

Look at longer time -horizon
Use a blended trip rate in the transportation calculation Review the storm drain fee
Obtain a second opinion on the report
The revised study addresses the direction of the City Council by changing the growth forecast from the 2040 estimate to General Plan buildout which is not assigned a specific year and has been included as Attachment D.

Page 768 of 1299 ends

The table below summarizes the development impact fees that meet the City's identified needs and comply with the requirements of the Mitigation Fee Act from the revised report.

E.'1: Maximum Justified Development Impact Fee Schedule - per Square Foot Fee Category
Residential Industrial;
Dwelling Industrial? High -Cube
Unit Commercial Business Park Warehouse
Park Land In Lieu (Subdivisions)' $ 0.79 $ - $ S
Park Land Acquisition (Non Subdiasions)2 0.77 -
Cammunity Park Improvements 0.53 -
Neighborhood Park Improvements 0.59 -
Recreation Facilities 0.93 -
Fire Protection Facilities 0.28 0.34 0.50 0.14
Police Facilities 0.87 0.48 0.69 0.20
Public Facilities 0.28 0.15 0.22 0.06
Streets and Bridges 1.70 15.59 7.04 1.95
Railroad Crossings 0.52 4.78 2.16 0.57
Sewer Facilities 0.92 0.45 0.33 0.69
Sewer Capacity3 472 1.80 3.33 2.29
Recycled Water 0.29 0.14 0.10 0.21
General Plan 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.004
Library District 0.15 -
Emergency Preparedness Facilities 0.01 11004 0.006 0.002 Storm Drain 1.10 0.97 0.75 0.97
Trails 0.01 -
Maintenance Equipment 0.01 0.01 0.010 0.003
Total (Subdivisions) $ 13.72 $ 24.72 $ 15.16 S 6.99
Total (Infill) $ 13.70 $ 24.72 $ 15.16 S 6.98
Fee in lieu of parkland dedication charged under the duirrby Act. 2 Fee for parkland acquisition charged under the ',litigation Fee Act. 3 "Commercial medium strength' fee shown for commercial. "Industrial high strength" fee shown for industrfaltusiness park. "Industrial low strength" fee shown for industrialfhigh cube w arehouse. Refer to Table 10.5 for full sewer capacity.. nonresidenlial fee Sources: Tables 18, 4.7, 5.6, 6.7, 7.7, 8.5, 9.5,10.4;10.5. 11.3, 12.5, 13.6, 14.5, 15.7, 16.6 and 17.6.

Impact fee may only fund the share of public facilities related to new development in Beaumont. They may not be used to fund the share of facility needs generated by existing development or by development outside of the City. The table below provides for identified additional funding that will be needed to complete the projects identified in the study.

Page 769 of 1299 ends

Table E.2: Non -Impact Fee Funding Required
Fee Category
Park Land
Community Park Irnproernents
Neighborhood Park Improvements
Recreation Facilities
Fire Protection Facilities
Police Facilities
Public Facilities
Streets and Bridges
Railroad Crossings
Sewer Facilities
Sewer Capacity'
Recycled Water
General Plan
Library District
Emergency Preparedness Facilities
Storrn Drain
Trails
Maintenance Equipment
Total
Net Project
Cost
$ 26,127, 072
18,072, 000
19,969, 000
62,440,220
12,965, 326
73,182,221
23,345, 367
304, 533, 272
92,211,598
70, 382,100
29,432, 627
1,722,271
5,807,961
695,153
51,250,472
312,000
573,512
$ 793,022,171
Development
Fee Revenue
$ 26,127,072
18,072,000
19, 969, 000
31,421,365
12, 965, 326
34,267,352
10,944,524
159,527,369
48,881,819
39,532,250
12,321,396
764,653
5,807,961
334,549
51,250,472
312,000
573,512
$ 473,072,650
Additional
Funding
Required
$
31,018,855
38, 914,869
12, 400,843
145, 005,902
43, 329,778
30, 849, 850
17,111,231
957,588
360,604
$ 319, 949,520
' Na project casts shown. Capacity fee revenue is used to pay back City far excess capacity used to serve new development at W VTP.

Sources: Tables 3.5.3.6.4.6. 5.3, 5.6. 7.6. 5.3. $.4. 9.4, 11.2. 12.4. 13.5, 14.4, 15.6, 16.3 and 17.3.

Second Opinion Report
City staff obtained a second opinion regarding the initial study from Urban Futures, Inc., whose overall conclusion and validation of the initial report states, "The Nexus Study satisfies the key elements and requirements of the Mitigation Fee Act, using appropriate and defensible methods, to establish the maximum amount of fifteen development impact fees that can be imposed and collected by the city on new development as applicable. The approach and methodologies used in the Nexus Study provide a strong foundation for supporting the five required "nexus" findings as established by the Mitigation Fee Act and other applicable laws."
This report has been included as Attachment G.

Follow-up with the Development Community

Page 770 of 1299 ends

On August 20, 2024, city staff had a follow-up meeting with representatives for the National Association for Industrial and Office Parks (NAIOP) Inland Empire Chapter and the Riverside County Building Industry Association (BIA), at their request, to review the changes within the revised report.

Notification
On September 1, 2024, in accordance with Government Code Section 66016.5, a 30 - day notice was published in the local newspaper of this public hearing with intent to adopt an Impact Fee Nexus Study which is included as Attachment K.

On September 13, 2024, city staff electronically sent the revised report and related documents to NAIOP Inland Empire Chapter and the Riverside County BIA.

On September 16, 2024, the revised report and schedules were added onto the city website and a link to the site was sent out to all stakeholders on the distribution list.

On September 20, 2024, in accordance with Government Code Section 66018, a 10 - day notice was published in the local newspaper of this public hearing with intent to adopt a Development Impact Fee Schedule which is included as Attachment L.

City Council Options
Transportation Projects Adjustments and Alternatives
The initial study presented at the May 7, 2024, Council meeting used the lowest trip rate for calculating the Industrial/High-cube Warehouse land use transportation fee and the study presented on June 18, 2024, used the highest trip rate. This report uses a blended trip rate for calculating the Industrial/High-cube Warehouse land use transportation fee which averages the probability of each use rather than the minimum and maximum extremes. Adjusting the Industrial/High-cube Warehouse land use trip rate impacts the allocation of the fee across all land uses. It was also requested for staff to bring back a schedule of prioritized projects and alternatives to the fully justifiable schedule. Staff provided transportation project alternative calculations for the transportation impact fee for near -term projects only and for mid-term and near -term projects. At the June 18, 2024, Council meeting it was requested that staff bring back an alternative schedule based on priority. That has been included as Attachment G. As a policy decision the City Council could choose to implement fees at lower levels than the maximum justified fees included in the study. However, it should be noted that City staff does not recommend this approach.

Page 771 of 1299 ends

Phased Fee Schedule Approach
As a policy decision, the City Council can also choose to phase in fees. Staff has included a phasing fee schedule which would incorporate the fees evenly over a four- year period. This schedule has been included as Attachment H. The estimated revenue loss from phasing the fees has been calculated and is included as Attachment I. This approach is also not recommended by City staff.

Reduced Fee in a Category
City staff recommends adopting the Storm Drain Fee at 50% of the maximum justified amount until the completion of a Storm Drain Master Plan. At that time the fee can be re-evaluated. This reduced fee has been included in the 2024 DIF Schedule which has been included as Attachment C.

Proposed Resolutions
There are two separate Resolutions staff is recommending that the City Council adopt:

1. A Resolution adopting the 2024 DIF Nexus Study; and

2. A Resolution adopting the 2024 DIF Schedule
If the City Council approves the 2024 DIF Schedule, State law requires a 60 -day period after the adoption of the respective Resolution before the fee increases can go into effect. City staff recommends the fees to become effective beginning on January 1, 2025.

Fiscal Impact:

The initial cost for the fee study is $79,080 with $76,212.50 spent by the end of FY2024.

The remaining amount of the purchase order was approved by the City Council to roll into the FY2025 budget, and an amendment was approved in the amount of $18,600 for a total of $97,680. The cost of the second opinion is $10,000 and staff time is estimated at $15,070 for a total study cost of $122,750.

The updated DIF Nexus Study dated September 6, 2024, supports a maximum future revenue stream of $473,072,650 with an additional funding requirement of $319,949,520 for projects identified in the study. The amount that will be collected is dependent on development within the city and will vary by fiscal year.

The estimated cost to prepare this report is $1,850.

Page 772 of 1299 ends

Recommended Action:

Staff recommends adopting at the maximum justified fees except for the Storm Drain Fee which is recommended to be adopted at 50% of the maximum justified fee.

Hold a Public Hearing:

Waive the full reading and adopt by title only, "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Beaumont Adopting the City of Beaumont Development Impact Fee Study Update Dated September 6, 2024".

Hold a second Public Hearing:

Waive the full reading and adopt by title only, "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Beaumont Adopting the City of Beaumont 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule Set Forth in the City of Beaumont Development Impact Fee Study Update Dated September 6, 2024".

Attachments:

A. Resolution No. DIF Nexus Study
B. Resolution No. DIF Schedule
C. Exhibit A to Resolution No. 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule D. 2024 Development Impact Fee Study Update 9/6/2024
E. Redline 2024 Development Impact Fee Study Update 9/6/2024 F. Impact Fee Scenario Comparison
G. Urban Futures, Inc Review of Development Impact Fee Nexus Study (dated May 31, 2024)
H. Alternative Transportation Impact Fee Schedule
I. Four -Year Phase -In Schedule
J. Potential Lost Revenue from Phase -In
K. Legal Advertisement Notice Dated September 1, 2024
L. Legal Advertisement Notice Dated September 20, 2024
M. Notice of Public Hearing for Fee Increase — So Cal Gas N. Notice of Public Hearing for Fee Increase — DVBA

0. Notice of Public Hearing for Fee Increase — Riverside BIA

Page 773 of 1299 ends

RESOLUTION NO.

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BEAUMONT

ADOPTING THE CITY OF BEAUMONT DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE
STUDY UPDATE (FINAL) DATED September 6, 2024
A. The City of Beaumont ("City") adopted Ordinance 1095 ("Ordinance") establishing the 2017 Development Impact Fee Program ("Fee").

B. Purpose of the Fee. The City Council finds that the purpose of the Fees hereby imposed is to prevent new development from adversely impacting the level of service for public facilities in Beaumont by requiring new development to contribute to the cost of improvements needed to meet the needs of new development.

C. Use of the Fee. The City Council finds that revenue from the impact fees hereby enacted will be used to acquire land and equipment and construct new facilities needed to mitigate the impacts of new development. Those improvements are identified in the 2024 City of Beaumont Development Impact Fee Study Update ("Fee Study") prepared by Wildan Financial Services.

D. Reasonable Relationship: Based on analysis presented in the 2024 City of Beaumont Development Impact Fee Study Update prepared by Wildan Financial Services, which is incorporated herein by reference, the City Council finds that there is a reasonable relationship between:

1. The use of the fees and the types of development projects on which they are imposed; and

2. The need for facilities and the types of development projects on which the fees are imposed.

E. In 2021, Assembly Bill 602 ("AB 602") amended the Mitigation Fee Act of the California Government Code which governs Development Impact Fees; and F. AB 602 emphasized the need to adopt a Development Impact Fee Nexus Study at a public hearing prior to the adoption of any new or increased Development Impact Fees; and
G. AB 602 requires in part that the Development Impact Fee Nexus Study identify existing level of service for each public facility, identify new levels of service, include an explanation of why the new levels of service are more appropriate, and include information to support the required findings for adoption of new or increased Development Impact Fees; and H. The Development Impact Fee Nexus Study basically provides a quantified basis for support of each Development Impact Fee and legal support for the required findings that must be made to justify the amount of each Development Impact Fee, based on existing deficiencies of certain public facilities and the projected burdens on those facilities caused by prospective development in the City; and
1

Page 774 of 1299 ends

I. The City's last Development Impact Fee Nexus Study took place in 2017, and since that time, the City has approved a Capital Improvement Plan, and has seen significant development activity in the recent years; and
J. The City retained the professional services of Wildan Financial Services to prepare the City of Beamont Development Impact Fee Study Update (Final) Dated September 6, 2024 ("2024 DIF Nexus Study"); and
K. By notice duly given and published, the City Council set the time and place for a public hearing on the Impact Fee Nexus Study to be presented for adoption, and at least 14 days prior to the hearing, the City made the Fee Study available to the public.

L. At the time and place set for the hearing, the City Council duly considered the data and information provided by the public relative to the costs for which the fees are proposed and all other comments, whether written or oral, submitted prior to the conclusion of the hearing.

M. The City Council finds that the Fee Study proposes a fair and equitable method for distributing a portion of the unfunded costs of the improvements and facilities.

N. The City Council hereby adopts the Fee Study and findings incorporated therein, and incorporates it herein as though set forth in full.

O. The City Council has determined that the adoption of this resolution is exempt from CEQA pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines.

NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Beaumont does resolve as follows:

SECTION 1. Recitals. The recitals set forth above are true and correct, and are hereby incorporated herein by this reference, and adopted as findings in support of this Resolution.

SECTION 2. Exhibits. That the Exhibit attached to this Resolution, which include the 2024 DIF Nexus Study attached and incorporated herein as Exhibit "A", which is on file with the Beaumont City Clerk's Office, the related Staff Report and all documents referenced therein are hereby incorporated herein by this reference.

SECTION 3. Evidence. That the City Council has considered all evidence submitted into the Administrative Record for the proposed adoption of the 2024 DIF Nexus Study.

SECTION 4. Findings. That based on the foregoing Recitals, Exhibits and all other evidence contained in the Administrative Record for this matter the City Council finds as follows:
a. That the 2024 DIF Nexus Study identifies the purpose of each Development Impact Fee;
b. That the 2024 DIF Nexus Study identifies the use to which each Development Impact Fee is to be put;
2

Page 775 of 1299 ends

c. That the 2024 DIF Nexus Study identifies all public facilities that will be financed by the respective Development Impact Fee;
d. That the 2024 DIF Nexus Study determines how there is a reasonable relationship between each Development Impact Fee's use and the type of development project on which the respective Development Impact Fee will be imposed; and e. That the 2024 DIF Nexus Study determines how there is a reasonable relationship between the need for each public facility and the type of development project on which the particular Development Impact Fee will be imposed; f. That the 2024 DIF Nexus Study includes all the requisite information to support the adoption of the 2024 DIF Nexus Study as required under subdivision (a) of Section 66001 of the California Government Code.
g.

That the 2024 DIF Nexus Study supports all increases of existing Development Impact Fees and the assumptions contained in the 2024 DIF Nexus Study supporting the original fees were properly reviewed and amount of the fees collected under the original fees were properly reviewed and amount of the fees collected under the original fee were properly evaluated pursuant to subdivision (a)(4) of Section 66016.5 of the California Government Code. h. That pursuant to subdivision (a)(5)(A) of Section 66016.5 of the California Government Code, since the 2024 DIF Nexus Study calculates the Development Impact Fees imposed on housing based on the square footage of the proposed number of units, it is deemed to be a valid method of establishing a reasonable relationship between the Development Impact Fee charged and the burden imposed by housing development;
i. That proper notice of the October 1, 2024, Public Hearing was provided pursuant to Sections 66002 and 60016.5 of the California Government Code for the 2024 DIF Nexus Study.

SECTION 5. Adoption of Fee Study. The City Council hereby adopts the Fee Study and its findings. The Fee Study is attached and incorporated herein as Exhibit "A".

ADOPTED this 1st day of October 2024.

NOES:

ABSTAIN:
3

Page 776 of 1299 ends

By:

David Fenn, Mayor, City of Beaumont
ATTEST:

CITY CLERK
By:
4

Page 777 of 1299 ends

EXHIBIT "A"
(ATTACH FEE STUDY)
5

Page 778 of 1299 ends

RESOLUTION NO.

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BEAUMONT ADOPTING THE CITY OF BEAUMONT 2024 DEVELOPMENT IMPACT

FEE SCHEDULE BASED ON THE FINDINGS SET FORTH IN THE CITY OF

BEAUMONT DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE STUDY UPDATE (FINAL) DATED SEPTEMBER 6, 2024
A. The City of Beaumont ("City") adopted Ordinance 1095 ("Ordinance") establishing the 2017 Development Impact Fee Program ("Fee").

1. The use of the fees and the types of development projects on which they are imposed; and

2. The need for facilities and the types of development projects on which the fees are imposed.

Page 779 of 1299 ends

prospective development in the City; and
I. The City's last Development Impact Fee Nexus Study took place in 2017, and since that time, the City has approved a Capital Improvement Plan, and has seen significant development activity in the recent years; and
J. The City retained the professional services of Wildan Financial Services to prepare the City of Beamont Development Impact Fee Study Update (Final) Dated September 6, 2024 ("2024 DIF Nexus Study"); and
K. By notice duly given and published, the City Council set the time and place for a public hearing on the Fee Study and the Fee proposed thereunder, and at least ten days prior to the hearing, the City made the Fee Study available to the public on September 16, 2024.

M. The City Council found that the Fee Study proposes a fair and equitable method for distributing a portion of the unfunded costs of the improvements and facilities, and specifically:

1. That the 2024 DIF Nexus Study identifies the purpose of each Development Impact Fee;

2. That the 2024DIF Nexus Study identifies the use to which each Development Impact Fee is to be put;

3. That the 2024 DIF Nexus Study identifies all public facilities that will be financed by the respective Development Impact Fee;

4. That the 2024 DIF Nexus Study determines how there is a reasonable relationship between each Development Impact Fee's use and the type of development project on which the respective Development Impact Fee will be imposed; and

5. That the 2024 DIF Nexus Study determines how there is a reasonable relationship between the need for each public facility and the type of development project on which the particular Development Impact Fee will be imposed;

6. That the 2024 DIF Nexus Study includes all the requisite information to support the adoption of the 2024 DIF Nexus Study as required under subdivision (a) of Section 66001 of the California Government Code.

7. That the 2024 DIF Nexus Study supports all increases of existing Development Impact Fees and the assumptions contained in the 2024 DIF Nexus Study supporting the original fees were properly reviewed and amount of the fees 2

Page 780 of 1299 ends

collected under the original fees were properly reviewed and amount of the fees collected under the original fee were properly evaluated pursuant to subdivision (a)(4) of Section 66016.5 of the California Government Code.

8. That pursuant to subdivision (a)(5)(A) of Section 66016.5 of the California Government Code, since the 2024 DIF Nexus Study calculates the Development Impact Fees imposed on housing based on the square footage of the proposed number of units, it is deemed to be a valid method of establishing a reasonable relationship between the Development Impact Fee charged and the burden imposed by housing development;
That proper notice of the October 1, 2024, Public Hearing was provided pursuant to Sections 66002 and 60016.5 of the California Government Code for the 2024 DIF Nexus Study.

N. The City Council adopted the Fee Study and findings incorporated therein, and incorporates it herein as though set forth in full.

O. The levying of the Fee has been reviewed by the City Council and staff in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the CEQA Guidelines and it has been determined that the adoption of this resolution is exempt from CEQA pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines.

NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Beaumont does resolve as follows:

SECTION 1. Fee Schedule. In accordance with the Ordinance, there is hereby adopted the fee schedule for the Fees as contained in Table E.1 in the Fee Study and attached hereto as Exhibit "A".

SECTION 2. Effective Date. This Resolution shall become effective sixty (60) days from the date of approval.

ADOPTED this 1st day of October 2024.

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

By:

David Fenn, Mayor, City of Beaumont
3

Page 781 of 1299 ends

ATTEST:

CITY CLERK
By:
4

Page 782 of 1299 ends

EXHIBIT "A"
5

Page 783 of 1299 ends

Public Works - Fee Schedule
City of Beaumont

DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES
Based on Nexus Study Dated 9/6/2024 (CC 10/17/2024)
Service Name
Fee Description
Fee
Emergency Preparedness Fee
Residential Dwelling Unit
Square Foot
$0.01
Commercial
Square Foot
$0.004
Industrial/Business Park
Square Foot
$0.006
Industrial/High-Cube Warehouse
Square Foot
$0.002
Fire Protection Facilities Fee
Residential Dwelling Unit
Square Foot
$0.28
Commercial
Square Foot
$0.34
Industrial/Business Park
Square Foot
$0.50
Industrial/High-Cube Warehouse
Square Foot
$0.14
General/Advanced Planning Impact Fee
Residential Dwelling Unit
Square Foot
$0.02
Commercial
Square Foot
$0.01
Industrial/Business Park
Square Foot
$0.02
Industrial/High-Cube Ware
Square Foot
$0.004
Maintenance Equipment Facilities Fee
Residential Dwelling Unit
Square Foot
$0.01
Commercial
Square Foot
$0.01
Industrial/Business Park
Square Foot
$0.01
Industrial/High-Cube Ware
Square Foot
$0.003
Park Facilities Fee Schedul-
Park Land in Lieu (Subdivisions)
Square Foot
$0.79
Park Land Acquisition (Non -Subdivisions)
Square Foot
$0.77
Community Park Improvements
Square Foot
$0.53
Neighborhood Park Improvements
Square Foot
$0.59
Police Facilities Fee
Residential Dwelling Unit
Square Foot
$0.87
Commercial
Square Foot
$0.48
Industrial/Business Park
Square Foot
$0.69
Industrial/High-Cube Warehouse
Square Foot
$0.20
Public Facilities Fee
1 Residential Dwelling Unit
Square Foot
$0.28
Commercial
Square Foot
$0.15
Industrial/Business Park
Square Foot
$0.22
Industrial/High-Cube Warehouse
Square Foot
$0.06
Railroad Crossing Impact Fee
Residential Dwelling Unit
Square Foot
$0.52
Commercial
Square Foot
$4.78
Industrial/Business Park
Square Foot
$2.16
Industrial/High-Cube Warehouse
Square Foot
$0.57
Recreation Facilities Fee
Residential Dwelling Unit
Square Foot
$0.93
Recycled Water Facility Fee
Residential Dwelling Unit
Square Foot
$0.29
Commercial
Square Foot
$0.14
Industrial/Business Park
Square Foot
$0.10

Page 784 of 1299 ends

Public Works - Fee Schedule
City of Beaumont
Industrial/High-Cube Warehouse
Square Foot
$0.21
Sewer Capacity Fee
Residential Dwelling Unit
Square Foot
$4.72
Commercial
Square Foot
$1.80
Industrial /Business Park
Square Foot
$3.33
Industrial/High-Cube Warehouse
Square Foot
$2.29
Sewer Facilities Fee
Residential Dwelling Unit
Square Foot
$0.92
Commercial
Square Foot
$0.45
Industrial/Business Park
Square Foot
$0.33
Industrial/High-Cube Ware
Square Foot
$0.68
Storm Drain Facilities Impact Fee
50% of Nexus Study until the Master Plan is Developed
Residential Dwelling Unit
Square Foot
$0.55
Commercial
Square Foot
$0.49
Industrial/Business Park
Square Foot
$0.38
Industrial/High-Cube Ware
Square Foot
$0.49
Streets & Bridges Impact Fee
Residential Dwelling Unit
Square Foot
$1.70
Commercial
Square Foot
$15.59
Industrial/Business Park
Square Foot
$7.04
Industrial/High-Cube Warehouse
Square Foot
$1.85
Trails Fee
Residential Dwelling Unit
Square Foot
$0.01
Non -City Fees
Library Facilities Fee
Residential Dwelling Unit
Square Foot
$0.15
Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP)*
Refer to RCA/MSHCP for actual Fees I.

Residential -Less than 8 du per acre
Dwelling Unit
$4,236
Residential -Between 8 and 14 du per acre
Dwelling Unit
$1,766
Residential - More than 14 du per acre
Dwelling Unit
$781
Commercial/Industrial
Per Acre
$19,066
* Fee Subject to change per RCA
Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF)*
Refer to WRCOG/TUMF for actual Fees
Residential -Single Family
Dwelling Unit
$10,104
Residential -Multi -Family
Dwelling Unit
$6,580
Commercial -Retail
Square Foot
$7.72
Commercial -Service
Square Foot
$4.89
Commercial -Service Class A & B Office
Square Foot
$2.45
Industrial
Square Foot
$1.86

Page 785 of 1299 ends

CITY OF BEAUMONT

DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS

STUDY UPDATE

REVISED DRAFT
SEPTEMBER 6, 2024
IVFinancial Services
Oakland Office
66 Franklin Street
Suite 300
Oakland, CA 94607
Tel: (510) 832-0899

LLDAN WI
WI
Corporate Office
27368 Via Industria
Suite 200
Temecula, CA 92590
Tel: (800) 755-6864
Fax: (888) 326-6864
www.willdan.com
Other Regional Offices
Aurora, CO
Orlando, FL
Phoenix, AZ
Plano, TX
Seattle, WA
Washington, DC

Page 786 of 1299 ends

This page intentionally left blank.

Page 787 of 1299 ends

TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6
Background and Study Objectives 6
Facility Standards and Costs 7
Use of Fee Revenues 7
Development Impact Fee Schedule Summary 8
Other Funding Needed 8

1. INTRODUCTION 10
Public Facilities Financing in California 10
Study Objectives 10
Fee Program Maintenance 11
Administrative Costs 11
Study Methodology 11
Types of Facility Standards 12
New Development Facility Needs and Costs 12
Organization of the Report 14

2. GROWTH FORECASTS 15
Land Use Types 15
Existing and Future Development 15
Occupant Densities 16

3. PARK FACILITIES 18
Service Population 18
Existing Parkland and Park Facilities Inventory 18
Parkland and Park Facilities Unit Costs 19
Parkland and Park Facility Standards 20
Mitigation Fee Act 20
Quimby Act 20
City of Beaumont Parkland and Park Facilities Standards 21 Facilities Needed to Accommodate New Development 21
Park Facilities Cost per Capita 23
Use of Fee Revenue 24
Fee Schedule 24

4. RECREATION FACILITIES 26
Service Population 26
Existing Recreation Facilities Inventory 26
Planned Recreation Facilities 27
Cost Allocation 27
Existing Level of Service 27
Future Level of Service 28
Use of Fee Revenue 28
Non -Fee Funding Required 28

WILLDAN I
Financial Services

Page 788 of 1299 ends

City of Beaumont Development Impact Fee Nexus Study Update Fee Schedule 29

5. FIRE PROTECTION FACILITIES 30
Service Population 30
Facility Inventories and Standards 31
Existing Inventory 31
Planned Facilities 32
Cost Allocation 33
Existing Level of Service 33
Future Level of Service 34
Use of Fee Revenue 34
Fee Revenue Projection 34
Fee Schedule 35

6. POLICE FACILITIES 36
Service Population 36
Facility Inventories and Standards 37
Existing Inventory 37
Planned Facilities 38
Cost Allocation 39
Existing Level of Service 39
Future Level of Service 39
Use of Fee Revenue 40
Non -Fee Funding Required 40
Fee Schedule 41

7. PUBLIC FACILITIES 42
Service Population 42
Facility Inventories and Standards 43
Existing Inventory 43
Planned Facilities 44
Cost Allocation 45
Existing Level of Service 45
Future Level of Service 45
Use of Fee Revenue 46
Non -Fee Funding Required 46
Fee Schedule 47

8. TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES 48
Fee Structure Changes 48
Trip Demand 48
Trip Growth 49
Project Costs 50
Fee per Trip Demand Unit 52
Fee Schedule 52

9. SEWER FACILITIES 54
Sewer Demand 54

WILLDAN
Financial Services
ii

Page 789 of 1299 ends

City of Beaumont Development Impact Fee Nexus Study Update EDU Generation by New Development 55
Facility Needs and Costs 55
Cost per EDU 60
Fee Schedule 60

10. SEWER CAPACITY 61
Current Demand for Wastewater Treatment 61
Current Sewer System Asset Valuation 61
Adjusted System Valuation 62
Fee per Gallon per Day 62
Nonresidential Fee Schedule 63
1 1 . RECYCLED WATER FACILITIES 65
Recycled Water Demand 65
Planned Facilities 65
Cost per EDU 65
Fee Schedule 66

12. GENERAL PLAN 68
Service Population 68
Planned Costs 69
Facility Standard 70
Fee Revenue Projection 70
Fee Schedule 71

13. LIBRARY FACILITIES 73
Service Population 73
Existing Library Facilities 73
Planned Facilities 74
Cost Allocation 74
Existing Level of Service 74
Use of Fee Revenue 75
Fee Revenue Projection 75
Fee Schedule 75

14. EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS FACILITIES 77
Service Population 77
Planned Facilities and Standards 78
Planned Facilities 78
Cost Allocation 79
Future Level of Service 79
Use of Fee Revenue 79
Non -Fee Funding Required 79
Fee Schedule 80

15. STORM DRAINAGE FACILITIES 81
Storm Drain Demand 81

WILLDAN
Financial Services
iii

Page 790 of 1299 ends

City of Beaumont Development Impact Fee Nexus Study Update EDU Generation by New Development 81
Existing Inventory 82
Planned Facilities 82
Cost per Equivalent Dwelling Unit 83
Projected Fee Revenue 83
Fee Schedule 84

16. TRAILS 85
Service Population 85
Existing Trails Inventory 85
Planned Trails 86
Cost Allocation 86
Existing Level of Service 86
Future Level of Service 87
Use of Fee Revenue 87
Fee Revenue Projection 87
Fee Schedule 87

17. MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT FACILITIES 89
Service Population 89
Facility Inventories and Standards 90
Existing Inventory 90
Planned Facilities 91
Cost Allocation 91
Existing Level of Service 91
Future Level of Service 92
Use of Fee Revenue 92
Fee Revenue Projection 92
Fee Schedule 93

18. AB 602 REQUIREMENTS 94
Compliance with AB 602 94
66016.5. (a) (2) - Level of Service 94
66016.5. (a) (4) — Review of Original Fee Assumptions 95 66016.5. (a) (5) — Residential Fees per Square Foot 95
66016.5. (a) (6) — Capital Improvement Plan 95

19. IMPLEMENTATION 96
Impact Fee Program Adoption Process 96
Inflation Adjustment 96
Reporting Requirements 96
Programming Revenues and Projects with the CIP 96

20. MITIGATION FEE ACT FINDINGS 97
Purpose of Fee 97
Use of Fee Revenues 97
Benefit Relationship 97
Burden Relationship 98

WILLDAN
Financial Services
iv

Page 791 of 1299 ends

City of Beaumont Development Impact Fee Nexus Study Update Proportionality 98
APPENDIX 1

WILLDAN
Financial Services
V

Page 792 of 1299 ends

Executive Summary
This report summarizes an analysis of development impact fees needed to support future development in the City of Beaumont through buildout of the City's General Plan. It is the City's intent that the costs representing future development's share of public facilities and capital improvements be imposed on that development in the form of a development impact fee, also known as a public facilities fee. The public facilities and improvements included in this analysis are divided into the fee categories listed below:
• Parks • Recycled Water
• Recreation Facilities • General Plan
• Fire Protection Facilities • Library District
• Police Facilities • Emergency Preparedness Facilities • Public Facilities • Storm Drain
• Transportation Facilities • Trails
• Sewer Facilities • Maintenance Equipment
• Sewer Capacity
Background and Study Objectives
The primary policy objective of a development impact fee program is to ensure that new development pays the capital costs associated with growth. The primary purpose of this report is to calculate and present fees that will enable the City to expand its inventory of public facilities, as new development creates increases in service demands.

The City imposes public facilities fees under authority granted by the Mitigation Fee Act (the Act), contained in California Government Code Sections 66000 et seq. This report provides the necessary findings required by the Act for adoption of the fees presented in the fee schedules contained herein.

The Mitigation Fee Act findings required to implement impact fees in California demonstrate the essential nexus between new development and a fee to fund facilities needed to serve that development. The term essential nexus refers to the relationship between new development and the need for facilities (and corresponding impact fees) to serve that development. The findings also require that this study demonstrates rough proportionality of the fees- meaning that the amount of the exactions must roughly correspond to the burden placed on the government, resulting from the proposed development project. To ensure that fees are roughly proportional to demand for facilities from new development, this study first allocates facilities costs to new development using the allocation methods described below, then to individual units of new development based on the demand characteristics of each unit, by land use type. This is described in detail in each chapter and summarized in Chapter 20.

All development impact fee -funded capital projects should be programmed through the City's five- year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). Using a CIP can help the City identify and direct its fee revenue to public facilities projects that will accommodate future growth. By programming fee revenues to specific capital projects, the City can help ensure a reasonable relationship between new development and the use of fee revenues as required by the Mitigation Fee Act.

Afif/WILLDAN
Financial Services

Page 793 of 1299 ends

6 City of Beaumont Development Impact Fee Nexus Study Update Facility Standards and Costs
There are several approaches typically used to calculate facilities standards and allocate the costs of planned facilities to accommodate growth in compliance with the Mitigation Fee Act requirements.

The system plan approach is based on a master facility plan in situations where the needed facilities serve both existing and new development. This approach allocates existing and planned facilities across existing and new development to determine new development's fair share of facility needs. This approach is used when it is not possible to differentiate the benefits of new facilities between new and existing development. Often the system plan is based on increasing facility standards, so the City must find non -impact fee revenue sources to fund existing development's fair share of planned facilities. This approach is used for the recreation, police, recycled water, general plan, emergency preparedness, and public facility fees in this report.

The planned facilities approach allocates costs based on the ratio of planned facilities that serve new development to the increase in demand associated with new development. This approach is appropriate when specific planned facilities that only benefit new development can be identified, or when the specific share of facilities benefiting new development can be identified. Examples include street improvements to avoid deficient levels of service or a sewer trunk line extension to a previously undeveloped area. This approach is used for the transportation -related, sewer facilities, fire facilities, maintenance equipment facilities and trails facility fees in this report.

The existing inventory approach is based on a facility standard derived from the City's existing level of facilities and existing demand for services. This approach results in no facility deficiencies attributable to existing development. This approach is often used when a long-range plan for new facilities is not available. Only the initial facilities to be funded with fees are identified in the fee study. Future facilities to serve growth will be identified through the City's annual capital improvement plan and budget process and/or completion of a new facility master plan. This approach is to calculate the parks, library, and storm drainage facilities fees in this report.

The buy -in method is typically used when the existing system has sufficient capacity to serve new development now and into the future. Under the buy -in methodology, new development "buys" a proportionate share of existing capacity at the current value of the existing facilities. This approach is typically used for utility fees, where existing facilities are built with excess capacity to serve future development. This approach is used for the sewer capacity fees in this report.

Use of Fee Revenues
The Mitigation Fee Act requires that this analysis "Identify the use to which the fee is to be put. If the use is financing public facilities, the facilities shall be identified. That identification may, but need not, be made by reference to a capital improvement plan as specified in Section 65403 or 66002, may be made in applicable general or specific plan requirements, or may be made in other public documents that identify the public facilities for which the fee is charged."1 Each chapter in this report identifies the appropriate use of impact fee revenues for each particular impact fee category.

Impact fee revenue must be spent on new facilities or expansion of current facilities to serve new development. Facilities can be generally defined as capital acquisition items with a useful life greater than five years. Impact fee revenue can be spent on capital facilities to serve new development, including but not limited to land acquisition, construction of buildings, infrastructure, the acquisition of vehicles or equipment, information technology, software licenses and equipment.
1 California Government Code §66001 (a) (2).

WWILLDAN
Financial Services
7

Page 794 of 1299 ends

City of Beaumont Development Impact Fee Nexus Study Update Development Impact Fee Schedule Summary
Table E.1 summarizes the development impact fees that meet the City's identified needs and comply with the requirements of the Mitigation Fee Act.

E.1: Maximum Justified Development Impact Fee Schedule - per Square Foot Fee Category
Park Land In Lieu (Subdivisions)
1 Park Land Acquisition (Non Subdivisions)2
Community Park Improvements
Neighborhood Park Improvements
Recreation Facilities
Fire Protection Facilities
Police Facilities
Public Facilities
Streets and Bridges
Railroad Crossings
Sewer Facilities
Sewer Capacity3
Recycled Water
General Plan
Library District
Emergency Preparedness Facilities
Storm Drain
Trails
Maintenance Equipment
Total (Subdivisions)
Total (Infill)
Residential
Dwelling
Unit Commercial
$ 0.79 $ $

0.77 0.53

0.59 0.93

0.28 0.34

0.87 0.48

0.28 0.15

1.70 15.59

0.52 4.78

0.92 0.45

4.72 1.80

0.29 0.14

0.02 0.01

0.15 0.01 0.004

1.10 0.97

0.01 0.01 0.01
$ 13.72 $ 24.72 $
$ 13.70 $ 24.72 $
Industrial/
Business Park

0.50 0.69

0.22 7.04

2.16 0.33

3.33 0.10

0.02 0.006

0.75 Industrial/
High -Cube
Warehouse

0.14 0.20

0.06 1.85

0.57 0.68

2.29 0.21

0.004

0.002

0.97 0.010 0.003

15.16 $ 6.98

15.16 $ 6.98
1 Fee in lieu of parkland dedication charged under the Quimby Act. 2 Fee for parkland acquisition charged under the Mitigation Fee Act. 3 "Commercial medium strength" fee show n for commercial. "Industrial high strength" fee show n for industrial/business park. "Industrial low strength" fee show n for industrial/high cube w arehouse. Refer to Table 10.5 for full sew er capacity nonresidential fee Sources: Tables 3.8, 4.7, 5.6, 6.7, 7.7, 8.5, 9.5, 10.4, 10.5, 11.3, 12.5, 13.6, 14.5, 15.7, 16.6 and 17.6.

Other Funding Needed
Impact fees may only fund the share of public facilities related to new development in Beaumont.

They may not be used to fund the share of facility needs generated by existing development or by development outside of the City. As shown in Table E.2, approximately $319.9 million in additional funding will be needed to complete the facility projects the City currently plans to develop. The "Additional Funding Required" column shows non -impact fee funding required to fund a share of the improvements partially funded by impact fees. Non -fee funding is needed because these facilities are needed partially to remedy existing deficiencies and partly to accommodate new development.

The City will need to develop alternative funding sources to fund existing development's share of the planned facilities. Potential sources of revenue include but are not limited to existing or new general fund revenues, existing or new taxes, special assessments, and grants.

WWILLDAN
Financial Services
8

Page 795 of 1299 ends

City of Beaumont Development Impact Fee Nexus Study Update Table E.2: Non -Impact Fee Funding Required
Fee Category
Net Project Development
Cost Fee Revenue
Additional
Funding
Required
Park Land
Community Park Improvements
Neighborhood Park Improvements
Recreation Facilities
Fire Protection Facilities
Police Facilities
Public Facilities
Streets and Bridges
Railroad Crossings
Sewer Facilities
Sewer Capacity'
Recycled Water
General Plan
Library District
Emergency Preparedness Facilities
Storm Drain
Trails
Maintenance Equipment
Total
$ 26,127,072 $ 26,127,072
18, 072, 000 18, 072, 000
19, 969, 000 19, 969, 000
62,440,220 31,421,365
12, 965, 326 12, 965, 326
73,182, 221 34, 267, 352
23, 345, 367 10, 944, 524
304, 533, 272 159, 527, 369
92,211,598 48,881,819
70, 382,100 39, 532, 250
29,432,627 12,321,396
1,722,271 764,683
5,807,961 5,807,961
695,153 334,549
51,250,472 51,250,472
312,000 312,000
573,512 573,512
$ 793,022,171 $ 473,072,650
31, 018, 855
38, 914, 869
12, 400, 843
145, 005, 902
43, 329, 778
30, 849, 850
17,111,231
957,588
360,604
$ 319, 949, 520
1 No project costs show n. Capacity fee revenue is used to pay back City for excess capacity used to serve new development at WWTP.

Sources: Tables 3.5, 3.6, 4.6, 5.3, 6.6, 7.6, 8.3, 8.4, 9.4, 11.2, 12.4, 13.5, 14.4, 15.6, 16.3 and 17.3.

WILLDAN
Financial Services
9

Page 796 of 1299 ends

1. Introduction
This report presents an analysis of the need for public facilities to accommodate new development in the City of Beaumont. This chapter provides background for the study and explains the study approach under the following sections:
• Public Facilities Financing in California;
• Study Objectives;
• Fee Program Maintenance;
• Study Methodology; and,
• Organization of the Report.

Public Facilities Financing in California
The changing fiscal landscape in California during the past 45 years has steadily undercut the financial capacity of local governments to fund infrastructure. Four dominant trends stand out:
• The passage of a string of tax limitation measures, starting with Proposition 13 in 1978 and continuing through the passage of Proposition 218 in 1996; • Declining popular support for bond measures to finance infrastructure for the next generation of residents and businesses;
• Unfunded state and federal mandates; and,
• Steep reductions in federal and state assistance.

Faced with these trends, many cities and counties have had to adopt a policy of "growth pays its own way." This policy shifts the burden of funding infrastructure expansion from existing ratepayers and taxpayers onto new development. This funding shift has been accomplished primarily through the imposition of assessments, special taxes, and development impact fees also known as public facilities fees. Assessments and special taxes require the approval of property owners and are appropriate when the funded facilities are directly related to the developing property. Development impact fees, on the other hand, are an appropriate funding source for facilities that benefit all development jurisdiction -wide. Development impact fees need only a majority vote of the legislative body for adoption.

Study Objectives
The primary policy objective of a public facilities fee program is to ensure that new development pays the capital costs associated with growth. Implementation Policy LUCD6 of the City's General Plan states "Development Fees. Update citywide development impact fees for infrastructure, affordable housing, other community benefits, and long range planning." The primary purpose of this report is to update the City's impact fees based on the most current available facility plans and growth projections. The proposed fees will enable the City to expand its inventory of public facilities as new development leads to increases in service demands. This report supports the General Plan policy stated above.

The City imposes public facilities fees under authority granted by the Mitigation Fee Act (the Act), contained in California Government Code Sections 66000 et seq. This report provides the necessary findings required by the Act to demonstrate the essential nexus between new development and the impact fees needed to support that development. The findings demonstrate

W'WILLDAN
Financial Services

Page 797 of 1299 ends

10 City of Beaumont Development Impact Fee Nexus Study Update that the fees are proportional to demand for facilities from new development and are necessary to allow the City to adopt the fee schedules presented in this report.

Beaumont is forecast to have significant growth through this study's planning horizon of General Plan buildout, which is not assigned to a particular year. This growth will create an increase in demand for public services and the facilities required to deliver them. Given the revenue challenges described above, Beaumont has decided to use a development impact fee program to ensure that new development funds the share of facility costs associated with growth. This report makes use of the most current available growth forecasts and capital facilities planning documents to update the City's existing fee program to ensure that the fee program accurately represents the facility needs resulting from new development.

Fee Program Maintenance
Once a fee program has been adopted it must be properly maintained to ensure that the revenue collected adequately funds the facilities needed by new development. To avoid collecting inadequate revenue, the inventories of existing facilities and costs for planned facilities must be updated periodically for inflation, and the fees recalculated to reflect the higher costs. The use of established indices for each facility included in the inventories (land, buildings, and equipment), such as the California Construction Cost Index, is necessary to accurately adjust the impact fees.

While fee updates using inflation indices are appropriate for annual or periodic updates to ensure that fee revenues keep up with increases in the costs of public facilities, it is recommended to conduct more extensive updates of the fee documentation and calculation (such as this study) when significant new data on growth forecasts and/or facility plans become available. For further detail on fee program implementation, see Chapter 19.

Administrative Costs
Administration of an impact fee program to comply with the requirements of the Mitigation Fee Act imposes costs on the City for capital budgeting, fee adjustments, mandated annual reports and 5 - year reviews of the impact fee program, as well as periodic impact fee update studies and legal review. It is common practice in California for cities to add a small administrative charge to impact fees to cover those costs.

This study uses an assumption of 1 % of the maximum justified fee to estimate the administrative costs associated with the fee program, consistent with the last impact fee study. To validate this assumption, City staff prepared an analysis of the administrative costs of the fee program from FY 2022-23. These costs were conservatively estimated at $108,282 compared to fee revenue of $8,184,833, equal to 1.32% of collected revenue. Note that this analysis excluded the administrative costs (and corresponding revenues) of the recycled water and sewer -related fees, as the administrative costs of those fee components were not tracked separately.

Study Methodology
Development impact fees are calculated to fund the cost of facilities required to accommodate growth. The six steps followed in this development impact fee study include:

1. Estimate existing development and future growth: Identify a base year for existing development and a growth forecast that reflects increased demand for public facilities;

2. Identify facility standards: Determine the facility standards used to plan for new and expanded facilities;

WI LLDAN
Financial Services

Page 798 of 1299 ends

11 City of Beaumont Development Impact Fee Nexus Study Update

3. Determine facilities required to serve new development: Estimate the total amount of planned facilities, and identify the share required to accommodate new development;

4. Determine the cost of facilities required to serve new development: Estimate the total amount and the share of the cost of planned facilities required to accommodate new development;

5. Calculate fee schedule: Allocate facilities costs per unit of new development to calculate the development impact fee schedule; and

6. Identify alternative funding requirements: Determine if any non -fee funding is required to complete projects.

The key public policy issue in development impact fee studies is the identification of facility standards (step #2, above). Facility standards document a reasonable relationship between new development and the need for new facilities. Standards ensure that new development does not fund deficiencies associated with existing development.

Types of Facility Standards
There are three separate components of facility standards:
• Demand standards determine the amount of facilities required to accommodate growth, for example, park acres per thousand residents, square feet of library space per capita, or gallons of water per day. Demand standards may also reflect a level of service such as the vehicle volume -to -capacity (V/C) ratio used in traffic planning. • Design standards determine how a facility should be designed to meet expected demand, for example, park improvement requirements and technology infrastructure for City office space. Design standards are typically not explicitly evaluated as part of an impact fee analysis but can have a significant impact on the cost of facilities. Our approach incorporates the cost of planned facilities built to satisfy the City's facility design standards.
• Cost standards are an alternate method for determining the amount of facilities required to accommodate growth based on facility costs per unit of demand. Cost standards are useful when demand standards were not explicitly developed for the facility planning process. Cost standards also enable different types of facilities to be analyzed based on a single measure (cost or value) and are useful when different facilities are funded by a single fee program. Examples include facility costs per capita, cost per vehicle trip, or cost per gallon of water per day.

New Development Facility Needs and Costs
A number of approaches are used to identify facility needs and costs to serve new development.

This is often a two-step process: (1) identify total facility needs, and (2) allocate to new development its fair share of those needs.

There are three common methods for determining new development's fair share of planned facilities costs: the system plan method, the planned facilities method, and the existing inventory method. The formula used by each approach and the advantages and disadvantages of each method is summarized below:

System Plan Method
This method calculates the fee based on the value of existing facilities plus the cost of planned facilities, divided by demand from existing plus new development:

Value of Existing Facilities + Cost of Planned Facilities = $/unit of demand

AP/WILLDAN
Financial Services

Page 799 of 1299 ends

12 City of Beaumont Development Impact Fee Nexus Study Update Existing + New Development Demand
This method is useful when planned facilities need to be analyzed as part of a system that benefits both existing and new development. It is difficult, for example, to allocate a new fire station solely to new development when that station will operate as part of an integrated system of fire stations that together achieve the desired level of service.

The system plan method ensures that new development does not pay for existing deficiencies.

Often facility standards based on policies such as those found in General Plans are higher than the existing facility standards. This method enables the calculation of the existing deficiency required to bring existing development up to the policy -based standard. The local agency must secure non -fee funding for that portion of planned facilities required to correct the deficiency to ensure that new development receives the level of service funded by the impact fee. This approach is used for the recreation, police, recycled water, general plan, emergency preparedness, and public facility fees in this report.

Existing Inventory Method
The existing inventory method allocates costs based on the ratio of existing facilities to demand from existing development as follows:

Current Value of Existing Facilities
Existing Development Demand
Under this method new development will fund the expansion of facilities at the same standard currently serving existing development. By definition the existing inventory method results in no facility deficiencies attributable to existing development. This method is often used when a long- range plan for new facilities is not available. Only the initial facilities to be funded with fees are identified in the fee study. Future facilities to serve growth are identified through an annual capital improvement plan and budget process, possibly after completion of a new facility master plan.

This approach is to calculate the parks, library, and storm drainage facilities fees in this report.

Planned Facilities Method
= $/unit of demand
The planned facilities method allocates costs based on the ratio of planned facility costs to demand from new development as follows:

Cost of Planned Facilities
New Development Demand
This method is appropriate when planned facilities will entirely serve new development, or when a fair share allocation of planned facilities to new development can be estimated. An example of the former is a Wastewater trunk line extension to a previously undeveloped area. An example of the latter is a portion of a roadway that has been identified as necessary to mitigate the impact from new development through traffic modeling analysis. Under this method new development will fund the expansion of facilities at the standards used in the applicable planning documents. This approach is used for the transportation -related, sewer facilities, fire facilities, maintenance equipment facilities and trails facility fees in this report. - $/unit of demand
Buy -In Method
The buy -in method is based on the value of the existing system's capacity. This method is typically used when the existing system has sufficient capacity to serve new development now and into the future. Under the buy -in methodology, new development "buys" a proportionate share of existing capacity at the current value of the existing facilities.

The buy -in fee is determined by taking the current value of assets (replacement cost new, less depreciation) divided by the current capacity provided by the system. Responsibility for new capital improvements is then shared equally by all customers. A simplified version of the calculation equation is:

Vbif/WILLDAN
Financial Services

Page 800 of 1299 ends

13 City of Beaumont Development Impact Fee Nexus Study Update Present Value of Existing Facilities
= cost per unit of demand
Existing System Capacity
This approach is typically used for utility fees, where existing facilities are built with excess capacity to serve future development. This approach is used for the sewer capacity fees in this report.

Organization of the Report
The determination of a public facilities fee begins with the selection of a planning horizon and development of growth projections for population and employment. These projections are used throughout the analysis of different facility categories and are summarized in Chapter 2.

Chapters 3 through 17 identify facility standards and planned facilities, allocate the cost of planned facilities between new development and other development, and identify the appropriate development impact fee for each of the following facility categories:
• Parks • Recycled Water
• Recreation Facilities • General Plan
• Fire Protection Facilities • Library District
• Police Facilities • Emergency Preparedness Facilities • Public Facilities • Storm Drain
• Transportation Facilities • Trails
• Sewer Conveyance • Road Maintenance Equipment
• Sewer Capacity
Chapter 18 describes how this study complies with the requirements of AB 602.

Chapter 19 details the procedures that the City must follow when implementing a development impact fee program. Impact fee program adoption procedures are found in California Government Code Sections 66016 through 66018.

The five statutory findings required for adoption of the proposed public facilities fees in accordance with the Mitigation Fee Act are documented in Chapter 20.

WI LLDAN
Financial Services

Page 801 of 1299 ends

14 2. Growth Forecasts
Growth projections are used as indicators of demand to determine facility needs and allocate those needs between existing and new development. This chapter explains the source for the growth projections used in this study based on a 2023 base year and a planning horizon of General Plan buildout, which is not assigned a particular year.

Estimates of existing development and projections of future growth are critical assumptions used throughout this report. These estimates are used as follows:
• The estimate of existing development in 2023 is used as an indicator of existing facility demand and to determine existing facility standards. • The estimate of total development at buildout is used as an indicator of future demand to determine total facilities needed to accommodate growth and remedy existing facility deficiencies, if any.
• Estimates of growth from 2023 through buildout are used to (1) allocate facility costs between new development and existing development, and (2) estimate total fee revenues.

The demand for public facilities is based on the service population, dwelling units or nonresidential development creating the need for the facilities.

Land Use Types
To ensure a reasonable relationship between each fee and the type of development paying the fee, growth projections distinguish between different land use types. The land use types that impact fees have been calculated for are defined below. • Residential: All residential dwelling units. Fees charged per square foot of living space.
• Commercial: All commercial, retail, educational, and hotel/motel development. • Industrial/Business Park: All manufacturing and other industrial development. • Industrial/High Cube Warehouse: All warehouse and distribution center development
Some developments may include more than one land use type, such as a mixed -use development with both residential and commercial uses. Another similar situation would be a warehousing facility that contains office space. In those cases, the facilities fee would be calculated separately for each land use type included within the building.

The City has the discretion to determine which land use type best reflects a development project's characteristics for purposes of imposing an impact fee and may adjust fees for special or unique uses to reflect the impact characteristics of the use.

Existing and Future Development
Table 2.1 shows the estimated number of residents, dwelling units, employees, and building square feet in Beaumont, both in 2023 and at buildout. The base year estimates of residents and dwelling units come from the California Department of Finance. The projection of total dwelling units at buildout is identified in Table 3.2b of the City's General Plan. Total dwelling units at buildout is then used to estimate population at building by multiplying the count of units by the Vbif/WILLDAN
Financial Services

Page 802 of 1299 ends

Beaumont City CouncilOctober 1, 2024

Beaumont City Council
October 1, 2024