August 6, 2002
Section 2 — Water Sources
SECTION 3
WATER USE
3.1 LAW
10631. A plan shall be adopted in accordance with this chapter and shall do all of the following:
10631 (e) (1) Quantify, to the extent records are available, past and current water use, over the same five-year increments described in subdivision (a), and projected water use, identifying the uses among water use sectors including, but not necessarily limited to, all of the following uses:
(A) Single-family residential; (B) Multifamily; (C) Commercial; (D) Industrial; (E) Institutional and governmental; (F) Landscape; (G) Sales to other agencies; (H) Saline water intrusion barriers, groundwater recharge, or conjunctive use, or any combination thereof; and (I) Agricultural.
(2) The water use projections shall be in the same 5 -year increments to 20 years or as far as data is available.
3.2 PAST, CURRENT, AND PROJECTED WATER USE
3.2.1 Past and Current Water Use
In 1990 the demand on the District supply was approximately 5,572 acre-feet, and the water demand in the year 2000 was 6,308 acre-feet. The population during this time period grew from an estimated 12,850 to about 14,550 with an estimated 850 services added. Water use for agricultural purposes has been and is a significant water demand within the District at approximately 4% of the total demand; however, land -use trends suggest that agricultural demand is diminishing and the percent of the District's demand which is agricultural will become relatively insignificant by the year 2025.
Although the water demand is based on well production records, the amount of average daily pumpage exceeds that of the average daily demand. This is due to several factors including inaccurate meters, fire flows, main flushing, leaks, and accidental main breaks, etc. Unaccounted for water is approximately 5 to 7 percent of the total water pumped.
This is easily within the range of a well -operated water system.
Table 3-1 illustrates past, current, and projected water use from 1990 to the year 2025 in AFY by planned development.
Beaumont -Cherry Valley Water District 3-1 August 6, 2002 200O Urban Water Management Plan Section 3 — Water Use
Table 3-1
Past, Current, and Projected Water Use — Development Basis Water Use
Sectors
1990
1995
2000
2005
2010
2015
2020
2025
Single & Multi-
family residential
2,984
2,608
3,297
5,135
7,332
9,256
10,808
11,852
Commercial
556
503
630
882
917
926
965
1,020
Industrial
187
169
212
303
324
338
367
408
Landscape /
Recycled Water
Users
900
900
1,100
1,900 '
4,000
5,900
5,900
6,000
Agriculture
223
201
252
224
212
197
193
163
Other
722
652
817
1,355
1,316
1,291
1,065
957
Total
5,572
5,033
6,308
9,800
14,100
17,900
19,300
20,400
Units of Measure: Acre-feet/Year
Past and current land use based water demands were calculated using the year 2000 land use % demand; projected land use based demands were calculated using the year 2000 and forecast land use % demand.
3.2.2 Projected Water Demands by Land Development
The various land use zones within the District's sphere of influence, based upon the City of Beaumont's General Land Use Plan and the County of Riverside General Plans, were used as the basis for water system planning. Considering full development of the land within the District's SOI, estimates of future water demand can be made. Table 3-2, Figure 3-1, and Figure 3-2 illustrate the percent of total water use by land use designation estimated within the District's S0I for both the current and future conditions.
Table 3-2
Total Projected Water Use by Land Use Zoning Designation TYPE
Present Use (%)
Future Use C%,
Residential (Single & Multifamily)
52%
58%
Commercial
10%
5%
Industrial
3%
2%
Landscaping / Recycled Water Users e.g.
parks, medians, cemeteries, golf courses,
egg ranch, groundwater recharge, etc.
17%
29%
Agriculture
4%
1%
Other e.g. construction, fire, maintenance,
system losses, etc.
13%
5%
Beaumont -Cherry Valley Water District 3-2
2000 Urban Water Management Plan..
age 1925 of 2775
August 6 2002
Section 3 — Water Use
Figure 3-1
Total Water Use by Land Use Designation in 2000
Agriculture
4%
Landscaping
17%
Industrial
3%
Other
13%
Commercial
10%
Residential
(Single &
Multifamily)
52%
Figure 3-2
Total Water Use by Land Use Designation in 2025
Agriculture Other
1% 50/0
Landscaping
29%
Industrial - ~
2%
Commercial
5%
Residential (Single
& Multifamily)
58%
Beaumont -Cherry Valley Water District 3-3
August 6, 2002
2000 Urban Water Management Plan
Section 3 — Water Use
Based upon present trends, the agricultural lands are being developed into residential uses; ultimate development projections are based upon residential use for presently zoned agricultural lands. Table 3-3 provides the water demands based upon the developments provided in Section 1 and provided again here for convenience.
In the District service area, residential customers average 2.90 persons per connection.
Total system per capita water use (excluding agricultural water use) averages 190 gallons per capita per day. The average daily demand for water is estimated to increase from the current value of approximately 5.6 MGD to nearly 33 MGD at build out, a nearly six -time increase as the District's SOI is developed. This complete build out of the SOI, however, will probably not occur until approximately 2050 or beyond. The cause for the substantial increase is (1) continued development of existing pressure zones, (2) expansion of the pressure zones to serve areas not now served by the District, and (3) addition of a new pressure zone, the 2650 Zone, to serve a portion of the SOI.
The residential, commercial, and industrial developments listed in Table 3-3 will add approximately 9,780 gpm or about 15,770 AFY to the current demand. This is based on a water demand of 0.38 gpm/EDU. Analyses of water meter records for three recent projects in Beaumont totaling 392 units indicated a range from 0.34 gpm/unit to 0.39 gpm/unit. The average of the projects studied was 0.37 gpm/unit. For the purposes of planning 0.38 gpm/EDU is used.
As listed in Table 3-2, residential land use is projected to be the primary component of future water demands, which comprises an estimated 58% of the total projected water use for the District service area. Based on a forecast average of 0.38 gpm/EDU or 550 gpd/EDU water demand, the projected, equivalent EDUs of 25,745 would equate to an additional water demand of approximately 15,770 AFY. Adding on the existing water usage of 6,308 acre-feet for the year 2000 results in a forecast usage of approximately 22,080 AFY. However this would not occur until sometime after 2025 when all of the projects identified in Table 3-3 are completed.
To further assess the water demand from forecasted property development, the potable water demand was plotted based on the "Estimated Start Date" for construction and the "Estimated Years to Build -Out" for the developments listed in Table 3-3. This estimated water demand assumes that demand will generally begin one year after the estimated start date of construction. The demand is equally distributed over the number of years to completion of the development. Therefore, the projected demand for each year of construction is based on the total number of EDUs and the estimated years to completion of the development. As referenced above, 0.38 gpm/EDU (i.e., 550 gpd/EDU) was used to estimate the projected water demand. To estimate the projected wastewater generated for residential and commercial/industrial development, 0.19 gpm/EDU (280 gpd/EDU) and 0.17 gpm/EDU (250 gpd/EDU), respectively, were used. The water demand projection based on development does not include some of the large recycled water users (e.g. golf courses) and is therefore mostly potable water demand. The known developments will also be served by the City of Beaumont's Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP). The calculation tables are provided in Appendix K and the results of the potable water demand and sewered wastewater production are shown in Figure 3-3.
Beaumont -Cherry Valley Water District 3-4
2000 Urban Water Management Plapage 1927 of 2775
August 6, 2002
Section 3 — Water Use
Table 3-3
Water Demands for Developments Requesting Service
Project Name
EDUs,
Residential
EDUs,
Commercial
& Industrial
Number of
EDUs
Average
Water
Demand
(AFY)
Estimated
Years to
Build Out
Estimated
Start Date
Deutsch - Pardee
4,500
140
4,640
2,840
31 2002
Noble Creek Villages
-
140
140
90 2
2003
Coscan Stewart, Three Rings Ranch
393
-
393
240
3 2002
Cougar Crossing
164
-
164
100
_
2 2003
Cougar Ranch
67 -
67 40
1 2002
Heartland Califomia Beaumont LP
994
490
1,484
910
10 2004
Hovchild
2,217
88 2,305
1,410
10 Beyond 2025
Lockhead Aircraft, Beaumont Gateway
-
400
400
250
3 2005
Loma Linda
1,078
1,645
_ 2,723
1,670
11 Beyond 2025
2003
Noble Creek (Lone, Donald D.)
200
200
120
2 Noble Creek Meadows, LLC
300
-
300
180
2 2003
Oak Valley Partners LP / SCPGA _
4,000
250
4,250
2,610
30 2003
Olinger Commercial _
-
84 84
50 1
2003
Precision 1 & 2 LLC
71 -
71 40
1 2005
Rolling Hills Ranch _
546
-
546
330
4 2003
Westbrook Oak Valley Greens
2,600
140
2,740
1,680
_
18 2002
Beaumont Mesa, Nejedly
650
200
850
520
4 Beyond 2025
Beyond 2025
Beyond 2025
2002
Willow Springs Area
2,800
210
3,010
1,840
13 Mission Viejo Co., Jack Rabbit
1,200
-
1,200
_ 740
5 Tract 24933
28 -
_ 28
20 1
Tract 30388
59 -
59 40
1 2003
Tract 25272
20 -
20 10
1 .
2002
Tract 30131
35 -
35 20
1 2002
Tract 30132 _
36 -
36 20
1 2002
TOTALS
25,745
15,770
OTHER POTENTIAL FUTURE PROJECTS, UNSCHEDULED
9,880
6,050
Beyond 2025
OVERALL POTENTIAL FUTURE DEVELOPMENT TOTALS
35,625
21,820
The City of Beaumont's WWTP receives wastewater from almost all of the City of Beaumont and the northeast portion of Cherry Valley. The remainder of Cherry Valley is currently unsewered; all parcels are on septic tanks. Development in Cherry Valley is limited to 1 EDU/acre, and it is assumed that septic tanks will continue to be permitted for this planned level of development.
Beaumont -Cherry Valley Water District 3-5
2000 Urban Water Management Plan
August 6, 2002
Section 3 — Water Use
Figure 3-3
Potable Water Demand and Sewered Wastewater Generation
Projected from Development
18,000
16,000
14,000
oL 12,000
10,000
L.
d 8,000
itt
6,000
n 4,000
co
oo 2,000
l l b l F 1 1 F 1 1 11 I I
NCv) LO CS) 1�00CS) NCh•ctCnCOr•-COM NCO•Cr
O O O O O O O O O N N N N N N
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
Year
8.0 7.0
6.0 a
5.0 E
N c
4.0 a
-a
3.0 L a
d o
2.0 dO•
1.0 -A - Potable Water Demand, Overall —0-Severed Wastewater Generation, Beaumont
3.2.2.1 Multiple and Single -Family Residential
Residential water consumption is composed of both indoor and outdoor uses. Indoor water use includes sanitation, bathing, laundry, cooking and drinking. Most outdoor water use is to meet domestic landscaping irrigation requirements. Other minor outdoor uses include car washing, surface cleaning, and similar activities.
Water efficiency improvements appear to be reducing per capita water use. Single-family residences generally contain larger landscaped areas versus multi -family or mobile home areas, and require more water for outdoor landscaping in comparison to other types of housing. Residential area water demands are expected to increase slightly to 58% of the total demand within the District's SOI.
3.2.2.2 Commercial
The District has a mix of commercial customers, ranging from markets, restaurants, stores, insurance offices, beauty shops, and gas stations to office buildings, shopping centers and other facilities serving the population. The commercial sector is growing each year. The planned development as shown in Table 3-3 includes planned areas of commercial land use to serve the proposed increasing population. The commercial water demands are expected to decrease to 5% of the total demand within the District's SOI, however the total demand will actually increase over the next 25 years.
Beaumont -Cherry Valley Water District 3-6
2000 Urban Water Management Plan Page 1929 of 2775
Au�c ust 6. 2002
Section 3 — Water Use
3.2.2.3 Industrial
The District has a small industrial sector, primarily centered on manufacturing and light manufacturing. The industrial sector has not grown much in the last decade. While there will likely be a few additions to the industrial areas within the District's SOI, the impact on water demands are expected to be small. The industrial development envisioned for Beaumont is low water -using industry.
3.2.2.4 Institutional and Governmental
The District service area has a stable institutional/governmental sector, primarily local government and schools. This sector will keep pace with the growth of the city.
3.2.2.5 Landscape / Open Space
Landscaped areas including parks, medians, schools, green belt areas, and executive golf courses in the District currently consume approximately 1,100 AFY. These will be supplied by recycled water once it is available. In addition to the current water demand, there are three championship golf courses, several ready -mix concrete facilities, groundwater recharge facilities, and an egg ranch within the District's SOI that could be served with recycled water as it becomes available. Landscape and recycled water customer demand is expected to increase significantly by approximately 12% over the next 25 years. These current and planned increases in landscape areas account for the increase in irrigation demands and represent a viable use of recycled water to offset those demands.
3.2.2.6 Agricultural
Agricultural water demand is projected to decrease in the next 25 years as the agricultural land is.. developed within the City of Beaumont and Cherry Valley. The City of Beaumont's General Plan reflects local citizen interest preserving open space and agriculture outside of the city.
3.2.3 Projected Water Demands by Population
The SCAG estimates presented in Section 1 were used to provide water demand estimates for comparison with the planned development estimates. This comparison is outlined in Section 5 of this UWMP. Table 3-4 below illustrates projected water use from 2000 to the year 2025 in AFY by population growth.
Beaumont -Cherry Valley Water District 3-7
2000 Urban Water Management Plan
August 6, 2002
Section 3 - Water Use
Table 3-4
Projected Water Use — Population Basis
Year
2000
2005
2010
2015
2020
2025
Total Population
14,550
22,110
33,610
42,850
53,000
66,180
2.74 # People/EDU
2.86 2.94
2.89 2.81
2.71 Forecast Population Demanda
N/A
4,600
7,200
9,400
12,100
14,900
Forecast Overall Useb
N/A
6,500
10,100
13,200
17,000
21,000
Recycled Water Demand
N/A
800
3,300
4,800
4,800
4,900
Total
6,308
7,300
13,400
18,000
21,800
25,900
Units of Measure: Acre-feet/Year
a Projected population based demands were calculated using 550 gpd/EDU, the estimated SCAG population and SCAG density factors.
b Existing District records show that residential (population) demand represent 71 % of total demand.
3.3 POTENTIAL RECYCLED WATER USERS
Section 8 of this plan discusses in more detail the potential users of recycled water within the District's service area.
Beaumont -Cherry Valley Water District 3-8
2000 Urban Water Management PlaPage 1931 of 2775
Au ust 6 2002
Section 3 — Water Use
SECTION 4
WATER RESOURCE RELIABILITY
4.1 LAW
10631. A plan shall be adopted in accordance with this chapter and shall do all of the following:
10631 (c) Describe the reliability of the water supply and vulnerability to seasonal or climatic shortage, to the extent practicable.
10631 (c) For any water source that may not be available at a consistent level of use, given specific legal, environmental, water quality, or climatic factors, describe plans to replace that source with alternative sources or water demand management measures, to the extent practicable.
10631 (c) Provide data for each of the following: (1) An average water year, (2) A single dry water year, (3) Multiple dry water years.
10632. The plan shall provide an urban water shortage contingency analysis which includes each of the following elements which are within the authority of the urban water supplier:
10632 (b) An estimate of the minimum water supply available during each of the next three -water years based on the driest three-year historic sequence for the agency's water supply.
4.2 RELIABILITY
Despite rapidly growing demands from residential development in the District service area, a number of opportunities exist to provide a reliable water supply for the community through to the area's ultimate buildout, which is not expected to occur until 2050 or later.
In the near term, the District will stabilize its demands on the BSU and Edgar Canyon areas, develop recycled water use, capture and percolate stormwater, and use imported water for water supply to customers. Available water supply from the SWP, stormwater capture, and recycled water use can be used interchangeably depending upon local and statewide hydrologic conditions to supplement a stable local groundwater yield.
In the near term, the District Recharge Program is expected to be complete by the winter of 2004-2005. In an average rainfall year, the BSU can be recharged over and above the District's extractions. The surplus recharge will become accumulated storage, which can be extracted during dry years and/or for future water demands. Reports by DWR' and the USGS2 estimate that the volume of groundwater in storage is approximately 1.1 million acre-feet. USGS, in 1971, reported that 160,000 acre-feet of available storage capacity exists in the BSU. DWR, in 1987, indicated the available storage may be even higher, approaching 383,000 acre-feet. This is over and above the 1.1 million acre-feet currently Beaumont -Cherry Valley Water District 4-1 August 6, 2002 2000 Urban Water Management Plan Section 4 — Water Resource Reliability
in storage. STWMA has indicated that the BSU has been in or near equilibrium for twenty years from 1980 to 2000.3
SWP water can be recharged for many years before the demand increases to meet the available supply. Since the BSU has a large amount of available capacity, this recharged water will essentially be banked for future use. Combining the runoff and recharge projects planned by the District and the recharge of SWP water, reliability of water supply in the area appears to be more than adequate over the next 25 years.
To further stabilize the local groundwater use in the Beaumont/ Yucaipa area STWMA is developing a Watershed Management Plan for the 140 square mile area that includes the service area and SOI of the District. The Plan will include all necessary components that will establish how the member agencies will protect water quality and manage the areas local water resources to allow for its best and most beneficial use.
STWMA has completed the first phase of a four phase program to produce the watershed management plan. STWMA, as part of phase 2 is currently in discussion with area groundwater users working toward an amicable settlement on the pumping rights of all of the BSU users. With an agreement in place, which is anticipated for late 2002 or early 2003, groundwater extractions of the BSU will be coordinated and stabilized through a court appointed Water. Master.
The District will continue to incorporate recycled water delivery systems into new development, focusing on servicing new irrigation demands with recycled water and converting existing irrigation uses to recycled water. Recycled water will provide the District a new local source of water of high reliability, both lessening the dependence on imported sources and increasing reliability of the District's total supply.
4.3 FREQUENCY AND MAGNITUDE OF SUPPLY DEFICIENCIES
The District experienced extended droughts during 1950 — 1969; 1976 — 1977; and 1987 — 1992. In all of these drought events the BSU and Edgar Canyon areas continued to provide adequate water quantities without the need to ration water supply and with continued supply to all customers. This can be attributed to the large amount of groundwater in storage in the BSU. This stored water is replenished during wet years.
Approximately 53% of the District's current water supply comes from the BSU. From 1950 to 1993, the groundwater level has declined about an average of 1.4 feet per year to a groundwater elevation of approximately 2,260 feet above mean sea level (msl).
However, from 1980 to 1999 the rate of decline slowed to nearly a steady state condition with essentially no qualitative change in groundwater storage in the BSU5. This clearly demonstrates the ability of the BSU to provide adequate water during extended drought periods.
4.4 PLANS TO AFFIRM A RELIABLE WATER SUPPLY
The main operational goal of the District is to use the surface water runoff, recycled water, and groundwater basins conjunctively. The current and future supply projections through 2025 are provided in Table 2-2 and a discussion is provided Section 2.2, which summarizes future plans to affirm a reliable water supply.
Beaumont -Cherry Valley Water District 4-2 August 6, 2002 2000 Urban Water Management Plan-. 1933 of 2775 Section 4 — Water Resource Reliability
As a means of addressing any future BSU overdraft conditions, the Pass Agency has constructed water transmission facilities initially capable of delivering a minimum average flow of approximately 8,650 AFY from northern California to spreading grounds for recharge of the BSU, and for direct delivery to a proposed treatment plant located in Yucaipa.6 Of this, an estimated 6,500 AFY will likely be available to the District.
However, because the Pass Agency contract entitlement is not a guaranteed amount available, the allocation during critical dry years could be only about 3,300 AFY.7 The Pass Agency's State Water Contract Entitlement is 17,300 AFY. To provide this much water, the current pump station capacity would need to be increased.
4.5 RELIABILITY COMPARISON
The data in Table 4-1 shows the minimum available water supply to the District for a theoretical drought in the next three water years, an average/normal water year in 2010, and a single dry year in 2010. The anticipated dry -year supply in 2010 was used for the single dry -year analysis in order to show the results of local and imported water supply development up through 2010. If projected recycle and import supplies are developed as indicated, no shortages are anticipated within the District service area in the dry -year scenarios analyzed. This assumes 5,000 acre-feet of SWP water can be purchased and/or accumulated groundwater storage can be extracted. As indicated in Section 2 and accounted for in Table 4-1, 8,250 acre-feet is deemed as the District available perennial yield of the BSU, well transfers from the recycled water in lieu program, septic system return flows, and Edgar Canyon groundwater supplies. It should be noted that additional water supplies will be available upon implementation of the recycle water use program projected to begin in 2003, which have been included for the 2010 analysis but not for the multiple dry year scenario. The multiple dry year scenario uses years 2001 through 2003 and would not have the benefit of an implemented recycled water program. Figure 4-1 provides a bar chart of the available water supply for a single normal year and single dry year using 2010 as a basis for comparison.
The year 2010 was used to run a single -dry water year supply reliability analysis. It was found that if the year 2010 is an average, normal water year and the planned conservation and water resource development programs are implemented within the District, then the available supply is projected to be 21,850 acre-feet using all available water resources. In the event of an extreme drought, assuming no rainfall, it is projected that a supply of approximately 11,450 acre-feet would be available for 2010 as a dry water year or about 50% of the projected non -drought, available water supply. This takes into account 5,650 acre-feet being available from the groundwater supplies including return flow from septic systems, 3,200 acre-feet of recycled water, and 2,600 acre-feet from users outside of the District, which have converted to recycle water, such as Oak Valley Golf Course and SCPGA. The dry year reliability analysis is extremely conservative in that it assumes that there will be no runoff for recharge to the BSU. It also assumes that there will be no use of SWP water. In reality, there may be several years of above normal rainfall and/or SWP purchases that provide accumulated supply in the BSU, which can be extracted during a dry year. Also, even historic dry years have limited amounts of rainfall and runoff that could be recharged to the BSU. Of the water supply sources discussed in Section 2, the District intends to utilize available water supply in the following order: Edgar Canyon Beaumont -Cherry Valley Water District 4-3 August 6, 2002 2000 Urban Water Management Plan Section 4 — Water Resource Reliability
wells, BSU wells (including groundwater recharged from stormwater capture and urban runoff), recycled water, and SWP water, transfers and exchanges into the District's supply.
Table 4-1
Available Water Supply Reliability
Multiple Dry Water Years
Average I
Normal Water
Year
2010
Single Dry
Water
Year
2010
Year 1
2001
Year 2
2002
Year 3
2003
21,850
11,450
6,450
_6,450
- - _6,450
Units of Measure: Acre-feet/Year - -
Figure 4-1
Available Water Supply Reliability for 2010
pW25,000
20,000
•
15,000
t5
to
Q. 10,000
Q
3 co
2, 5,000
5 350
300
. 1000`
4,100
3,200
350
•
3,200
:. r
` MgOR
5,000..
Average / Normal Water Single Dry Water Year
Year
• Return Flows from
Septic Systems
®Captured Infiltration
(shallow groundwater)
Urban Runoff/
Groundwater Recharge
o Stormwater Recharged
to Groundwater
o Recycled Water
Use/Potable Offset
® Supplier Produced
Groundwater
SWP via San Gorgonio
Pass Agency
As provided in Table 3-1 of this document, the projected water demand is forecasted to be approximately 14,100 acre-feet for the year 2010. For this case study, there is Beaumont -Cherry Valley Water District 4-4 August 6, 2002 2000 Urban Water Management Plan Page 1935 of 2775 Section 4 — Water Resource Reliability
sufficient water supply to meet the water demand for the year 2010 for a normal water year.
The BSU can be used during dry years to provide water supply from groundwater storage.
The District does. not anticipate the need to reduce water deliveries during a drought unless the drought lasts for many years and the groundwater levels decline to very low levels. The District will however encourage water conservation. The BSU would be recharged during wet years through the use of imported water, increased rainfall percolation, and stormwater runoff recharge. The BSU acts as a large reservoir for the District. For example, if the demand were to exceed the available water supply by 7,000 acre-feet, and this water demand were to be produced from the groundwater basin, the level of the basin would drop approximately 1.3 feet in the water table assuming 28 square miles and a 25% porosity. The District is capable of handling many dry years in a row before the extractions would result in a measurable impact. Storage in the BSU will cycle between more storage and less storage with no adverse impact to the equilibrium of the BSU due to hydrologic conditions.
Similarly, if the water supply were unable to meet water demand within the District's service area, water shortage contingencies, as provided in Section 6, could be implemented on a temporary basis to accommodate such short-term supply deficiencies.
These measures would only be implemented if considered to be necessary.
The emphasis of the District is to develop the recycled water infrastructure and stormwater capture recharge programs. The immediate benefit for additional water resource is the capture of stormwater runoff for percolation into the BSU. The first phase of the project (2,600 AFY) is scheduled for completion by about 2005. It can be seen from Figure 4-1 that full implementation of the project, which is anticipated for completion by 2010, will generate 4,100 AFY of additional water supply. Obviously the anticipated stormwater runoff during a dry year is not expected to match the long-term average of 4,100 AFY, however, the runoff is also expected to be greater during heavy rainfall years. The accumulated storage from heavy rainfall years and surplus storage from typical years can be extracted during dry years when necessary.
4.6 INCONSISTENT WATER SOURCES
4.6.1 Law
10631. A plan shall be adopted in accordance with this chapter and shall do all of the following:
10631 (c) For any water source that may not be available at a consistent level of use, given specific legal, environmental, water quality, or climatic factors, describe plans to replace that source with alternative sources or water demand management measures, to the extent practicable.
All current water sources are available consistently. The District can for short periods of time, extract greater quantities of groundwater in the BSU knowing that during wet years the basin will be replenished. Section 6 discusses water shortage contingencies that can be implemented on a short-term basis to assist during periods of water supply shortages.
Beaumont -Cherry Valley Water District 4-5 _ August 6, 2002 2000 Urban Water Management Plan Section 4 — Water Resource Reliability
4.7 THREE YEAR MINIMUM WATER SUPPLY
4.7.1 Law
10632. The plan shall provide an urban water shortage contingency analysis which includes each of the following elements which are within the authority of the urban water supplier:
10632 (b) An estimate of the minimum water supply available during each of the next three water years based on the driest three-year historic sequence for the agency's water supply.
Based on experiences during the recent and historic droughts, the District can expect to use groundwater as well as future recycled water, banked stormwater runoff capture, and banked imported SWP water to provide adequate water for meeting all of the community's needs during future droughts. The estimated three-year minimum water supply is the same as the multiple dry water years provided in Table 4-1.
I Ground Water Storage, Movement, and Quality Data, San Gorgonio Pass Water Agency (September 1987). Letter Report prepared by Department of Water Resources, page 25.
2 Underground Storage of Imported Water in the San Gorgonio Pass Area, Southern California, Geological Survey Water - Supply Paper 1999-D (1971). Prepared by R.M. Bloyd, Jr., page D29. 3 San Timoteo Watershed Management Authority, Watershed Management Program, Phase 1 (March 2002). Prepared by Wildermuth Environmental Inc., Section 2.3.2.2, page 2-7. 4 1994 Water System Master Plan Update (September 1995). Beaumont -Cherry Valley Water District. Prepared by Parsons Engineering Science Inc. Pages 4-13 through 4-15.
5 San Timoteo Watershed Management Authority, Watershed Management Program, Phase 1 (March 2002). Prepared by Wildermuth Environmental Inc., Section 2.3.2.3, page 2-8. 6 Noble Creek Vistas Specific Plan Draft Environmental Impact Report (September 2001). City of Beaumont. Prepared by Applied Planning Inc. Pages 4.3-4 and 4.3-5.
7 1994 Water System Master Plan Update (September 1995). Beaumont -Cherry Valley Water District. Prepared by Parsons Engineering Science Inc. Page 4-18.
Beaumont -Cherry Valley Water District 4-6 August 6, 2002 2000 Urban Water Management PlaPage 1937 of 2775 Section 4 — Water Resource Reliability
SECTION 5
SUPPLY AND DEMAND COMPARISON PROVISIONS
5.1 LAW
10635 (a) Every urban water supplier shall include, as part of its urban water management plan, an assessment of the reliability of its water service to its customers during normal, dry, and multiple dry water years. This water supply and demand assessment shall compare the total water supply sources available to the water supplier with the total projected water use over the next 20 years, in five-year increments, for a normal water year, a single dry water year, and multiple dry water years. The water service reliability assessment shall be based upon the information compiled pursuant to Section 10631, including available data from the state, regional, or local agency population projections within the service area of the urban water supplier.
5.2 TWENTY-FIVE YEAR COMPARISION
The forecast population growth and the forecast land development presented in Section 4 potentially create two different scenarios for water demand versus supply over time.
Population growth information was provided by SCAG, the developers provided land development data, and the City of Beaumont provided land development data based on the developer's sales forecasts. In addition to the inherent uncertainties of population growth, it is also uncertain if the forecast land development may influence or accelerate the rate of growth in other places within the service area. The twenty-five year comparison of water demand versus supply therefore takes these two scenarios into consideration.
5.2.1 Supply vs. Demand by Population
Table 5-1 compares current, and projected water supply and demand based on the forecast increase in population, and Figure 5-1 depicts the corresponding water demand versus supply. The individual components for the water supply totals are provided in Table 2-3, and the individual components for determining the demand totals are shown in Table 3-1.
Beaumont -Cherry Valley Water District
5-1 August 6, 2002
2000 Urban Water Management Plan Section 5 — Supply and Demand Comparison Provisions
Table 5-1
Projected Supply and Demand Comparison By Population Growth 2000
2005
2010
2015
2020
2025
Supply totals
6,308
15,380
21,950
25,200
26,260
26,720
Demand totals
6,308
7,300
13,400
18,000
21,800
25,900
Supply Surplus
(0)
8,080
8,550
7,200
4,460
820
Units of Measure: Acre-feet/Year
Figure 5-1
Supply Reliability and Demand Comparison By Population Growth 30 I
25 •
N
-a
c
co
N
0 20
0 w
15 * k
m
w-
I-
(5
10 .:
a)
I
l
5 0
1995
2000
2005 2010 2015 2020
Year
2025
2030
--- Supply —6L— Demand, Population Based
The comparison of water supply versus demand by population reflects that in average precipitation years, the District has sufficient water to meet its customers' needs through 2025. This is based on continued commitment to conservation programs, additional recycle water becoming available, development of additional stormwater capture and percolation systems, and the import of SWP water. It should be noted that future Beaumont -Cherry Valley Water District 5-2
August 6, 2002
2000 Urban Water Management Plan Section 5 — Supply and Demand Comparison Provisions
It should be noted that the additional supplies necessary to meet future demands in dry years beyond 2010 will be obtained by further developing recycled water resources, as discussed in Sections 3 and 8, the District's Recharge Program, and supplemental use of banked SWP water if needed.
5.4 STWMA COMPARISONS
The STWMA has prepared a memorandum2, which provides water demand, water supplies, and supplemental water demand for the District from the year 2000 through 2050. Table 5-4 provides a comparison of the STWMA projections with the land development projections discussed in Section 5.2.2 within this report.
Table 5-4
STWMA Compared to Estimates By Land Development
Basis Years =>
2000
2005
2010
2015
2020
2025
Suppl totals
UWMP
6,308
15,380
21,850
24,800
25,460
26,120
STWMAa '
11,400
15,200
15,800
, 18,000
20,200
22,400
Demand totals
UWMP
6,308
9,800
14,100
17,800
19,300
20,400
STWMAb
11,400
13,600
15,800
18,000
20,2.00
22,400
Units of Measure: Acre-feet/Year
As shown in Table 5-4, the STWMA report matches the demand with supply. Any difference. between demand and supply was handled by increasing the available supply with imported water to satisfy the demand. Only year 2005 is shown to have a surplus in water supply. Interestingly, the STWMA demand estimates are higher than the estimates used for this UWMP, and the STWMA supply estimates are lower than the estimates used for this UWMP. Figure 5-3 provides a graphical comparison of the two estimates.
The STWMA projections and the District's UWMP projections correlate reasonably well. a Includes supplemental water demand satisfied with imported water after 2002. b Includes both potable and non -potable demands.
Beaumont -Cherry Valley Water District 5-7 August 6, 2002 2000 Urban Water Management Plan Section 5 — Supply and Demand Comparison Provisions
Figure 5-3
STWMA and UWMP Land Development Estimates
Water, acre-feet (thousands)
N N G
_a O CT 0 C71 0 U1 C
/'
,
Ci
p'
-
-0- UWMP Supply totals, Land
Development
--®—STWMA Supply totals
---UWMP Demand totals, Land
Development
- O - STWMA Demand totals
•
2000
2005
2010 2015 2020 2025 2030
Year
I 2000 Urban Water Management Plan (December 2000), Carlsbad Municipal Water District, Chapter 6, pg. 28. 2 San Timoteo Watershed Management Authority, Watershed Management Program,Phase 1 (March 2002).
Prepared by Wildermuth Environmental Inc., Table 4-2.
Beaumont -Cherry Valley Water District 5-8 August 6, 2002 2000 Urban Water Management Plan Section 5 - Supply and Demand Comparison Provisions
SECTION 6
WATER SHORTAGE CONTINGENCY PLAN
6.1 LAW
10632. The plan shall provide an urban water shortage contingency analysis which includes each of the following elements which are within the authority of the urban water supplier:
10632 (c) Actions to be undertaken by the urban water supplier to prepare for, and implement during, a catastrophic interruption of water supplies including, but not limited to, a regional power outage, an earthquake, or other disaster.
6.2 PREPARATION FOR CATASTROPHIC WATER SUPPLY INTERUPTIONS Water supplies may be interrupted or reduced significantly in a number of ways - drought, an earthquake that damages water delivery or storage facilities, or a toxic spill that affects water quality. This section of the UWMP describes how the District plans to respond to such emergencies so that emergency needs are met promptly and equitably.
6.2.1 Drought Conditions
The Pass Agency is the wholesale contractor for delivery of SWP water to the District.
The DWR has prepared a study, which projects the probability of delivering the full entitlement to its wholesale contractors. The State Water Project has been able to deliver to their member Agencies approximately 75 percent of the water requested between 1990 and 2001. At such time when the District receives SWP water it is estimated that the District would receive approximately 5,000 AFY on a long-term basis. During times of drought the SWP may only deliver about 10%-20% of the amount requested.
As discussed in Section 2, the storage within BSU can be used in times of continued drought and would be recharged with natural water, recycled water and/or imported water during wet years or years of surplus water supply.
Beaumont -Cherry Valley Water District
6-1 August 6, 2002
2000 Urban Water Management Plan Section 6 — Water Shortage Contingency Plan
6.2.2 Earthquake or other Natural Disasters
The San Andreas Fault passes through the Pass area. If a major earthquake were to occur along the San Andreas Fault in the Pass area many of the District's facilities could be affected.
The California Aqueduct could be ruptured by displacement on the San Andreas Fault, and supply may not be restored for a three to six week period. The situation would be further complicated by physical damage to the pumping equipment and local loss of electrical power. The DWR has a contingency Aqueduct Outage Plan for bringing the California Aqueduct back on line should a major break occur, which they estimate would take approximately four months to repair.
Experts agree it may be at least 72 hours after the earthquake before outside help could get into the local area. Extended supply shortages of both groundwater and imported water, due to power outages and/or equipment damage resulting from a natural disaster, would be severe until the water supply could be restored.
The District's recently constructed storage tanks have been fitted with flexible couplings, which should reduce the damage to local storage. The public would be asked to reduce consumption to minimum health and safety levels. This would provide sufficient time to restore groundwater production, if interrupted.
The District is also working on emergency interties at various locations along Highland Springs Road such that water can be supplied in either direction between the City of Banning and the District.
6.2.3 Contamination
The local water sources are of very good quality, with no problems related to industrial or agricultural contamination. If contamination did result from a toxic spill or similar accident, the contamination would be isolated and should not significantly impact the total water supply.
6.3 BEAUMONT-CHERRY VALLEY WATER DISTRICT EMERGENCY FACILITIES To meet emergency water needs the District has a multi -tiered system. First, approximately 12.65 MG (38.8 acre-feet) of gravity storage is available as listed in Table 6-1. Second, emergency engine generators and backup systems are available for the wells and locations provided in Table 6-2; the wells can supply up to a maximum of 6,200 gpm, or 27.4 acre-feet per day (AF/Day). Note that the year 2001 average demand of 7,134 acre-feet is equivalent to 19.5 AF/Day as a comparison.
Beaumont -Cherry Valley Water District 6-2 August 6, 2002 2000 Urban Water Management Plan Section 6 — Water Shortage Contingency Plan
Table 6-1
Available Emergency Reservoir Storage
Available Reservoirs
Total Aboveground
Storage (MG)
Total Aboveground
Storage (acre-feet))
Upper Edgar
0.75 2.3
Lower Edgar
1.0 3.1
Noble &
Highland Springs
2.0 6.1
Vineland
1.0 3.1
Cherry
2.0 6.1
Taylor (under const., est.
to complete 10/02)
3.9 12.0
Vineland H (in design)
2.0 6.1
TOTAL
12.65 38.8
The above reservoir storage capacity does not include the Twelfth and Palm Reservoir (0.4 MG). This serves as an equalization tank for the Twelfth and Palm Boosters. A second Vineland Reservoir with a capacity of 2 MG is in design and proposed to be on- line in 2003. This would increase the storage to 14.65 MG or 45.0 acre-feet.
Table 6-2
Wells With Emergency Generators and Backup Systems
Wells '
No.
Location
Total Capacity
Remarks
GPM AF/Day
12 Upper Edgar Canyon
, 400
1.8 Auxiliary engine drive
14 Upper Edgar Canyon
500
2.2 Portable generator connection
6 Middle Edgar Canyon
600
2.7 Auxiliary engine drive
4A
Lower Edgar Canyon
650
2.9 Portable generator connection
2 BSU
2,200
9.7 Portable generator connection
16 BSU
1,250
5.5 Portable generator connection
21 BSU
2,200
9.7 Portable generator connection
22 BSU
1,750
7.7 Portable generator connection
TOTAL
9,550
42.2 ^
Well Nos. 6 and 12 have auxiliary engine -drives, which can be used in the event of an electrical failure. Well Nos. 2, 4A, 14, 16, 21, and 22 have provisions for portable generator hook-up. The District has three portable and two stationary generators. The portable units have the capability of running up to 50, 350 and 550 horsepower (hp) Beaumont -Cherry Valley Water District
2000 Urban Water Management Plan
6-3 August 6, 2002
Section 6 — Water Shortage Contingency Plan
motors. The Cherry Yard Booster station also has a natural gas driven pump that has a capability of pumping 1,500 gpm from the Cherry reservoir to the Noble reservoir. There is an emergency booster at the Well 4A site with a 100 hp motor; which is rated at 500 gpm and delivers water to the Upper Edgar Tank. In addition, the 50 hp Noble Tank Booster, which has a rated capacity of 500 gpm, serves as a backup to the Mesa Pressure Zone and Lower Edgar Tank. In 1998 and 1999, Boosters 21A and 21B which pump from the Cherry Reservoir to Noble Reservoir were also retrofited with transfer switches.
In 2001 the District installed stationary backup generators with automatic transfer switches at the headquarters and at Highland Springs Hydropneumatic system.
6.4 STAGES OF ACTION
As mentioned earlier, the District presently receives all of its water supply from underground sources. Although the District presently has a. relatively uninterrupted source of water to meet water demands, water shortage contingency planning is still of utmost importance to the District in order to meet future water demands during a prolonged drought condition. The District proposes a four -stage plan of action in the event of a long-term drought condition or loss of supply. The action levels for each stage are presented in the subsections that follow, and the water supply rationing stages are provided in Table 6-3.
Table 6-3
Water Supply Shortage Stages and Conditions
RATIONING STAGES
Rationing Stages
1 2
3 4
Water.Supply Conditions
(% Total Reduction)
10%"
10%m /
20%"
20%m /
30%"
20%m /
30%"
v = voluntary reduction
m = mandatory reduction
6.4.1 Stage 1
Stage 1 occurs when the District declares a water shortage and imposes voluntary water conservation. In this stage the District shall notify all its customers that water deliveries may be reduced. The District will recommend a voluntary 10 percent water use reduction based on an established base year to be determined by the District at the time Stage 1 is implemented. At the same time the District shall start its own public awareness program to encourage the efficient use of water. This will be accomplished by printing articles in the local newspaper and distributing literature and publications to its customers. Public awareness programs will also include educational conservation programs that would be introduced in the schools.
6.4.2 Stage 2
Stage 2 occurs when the District determines voluntary water reduction goals are not being met and the declared water shortage has been in effect for two consecutive years. In this stage the District will recommend a 10 percent mandatory reduction in water use and Beaumont -Cherry Valley Water District 6-4 August 6, 2002 2000 Urban Water Management Plan Section 6 — Water Shortage Contingency Plan
continue its public awareness efforts and conduct a survey on a 20 percent voluntary water use reduction program. The District at this time will begin to establish a water conservation advisory committee. This committee will comprise of officials from the District, the City of Beaumont, and the Cherry Valley community.
6.4.3 Stage 3
Stage 3 occurs if the water shortage continues for four consecutive years. In this stage the District will recommend a mandatory 20 percent and a voluntary 30 percent water use reduction from the established base year. The District will adopt a rate structure with financial incentives to encourage efficient water use. The District will also develop a plan and ordinance to enforce penalties for excessive water use and include prohibition against specific wasteful practices such as gutter flooding, open hose car washing, and driveway washdown, etc. The District will analyze the impacts of the plan on the revenues and expenditures of the District and propose measures to overcome those impacts, such as adjustments in customer rates, to help pay for additional sources of water.
6.4.4 Stage 4
Stage 4 occurs if the declared water shortage continues for one year after Stage 3. In this stage the District shall conduct a survey on the mandatory 20 percent and voluntary 30 percent water use reduction programs and consider enforcing penalties described in the ordinance developed under Stage 3.
6.4.5 Implementation
It is highly unlikely that the District will need to implement any of these stages within the next 20 to 25 years since the available water supply even under worst case conditions is nearly equal to or greater than the demand for the next 3 years. Because of this it is not possible to link specific water supply quantities with "stages" at this time. The District recognizes the importance of long-term groundwater management and to that end has taken steps to implement a Basin Wide (AB3030) Groundwater Management Plan (GWMP) through the participation in the STWMA. As part of the STWMA, data on the BSU characteristics would be collected and analyzed to better understand basin performance under varying hydrologic (wet/dry) conditions. This information could be used to determine if specific trigger mechanisms are necessary to protect the BSU.
6.5 METHODS OF DEMAND REDUCTION
6.5.1 Health and Safety Requirements for Residential Households Based on commonly accepted estimates of interior residential water use in the United States, Table 6-4 indicates minimum per capita health and safety water requirements. In Stage 1 shortages, customers may adjust either interior or outdoor water use or both, in order to meet the voluntary water reduction goals. Where mandatory reduction is required, Stages 2, 3, and 4, the District staff may recommend to the Board that Beaumont -Cherry Valley Water District
2000 Urban Water Management Plan
6-5 August 6, 2002
Section 6 — Water Shortage Contingency Plan
residential customers meet the interior water use shown below or be subject to penalties and charges.
Table 6-4
Per Capita Health & Safety Water Quantity Calculations
Non -Conserving Fixtures
Habit Changes'
Conserving Fixtures2
Toilets
5 flushes x 5.5 gpf
27.5 3 flushes x 5.5 gpf
16.5 5 flushes x 1.6 gpf
8.0 Shower
5 min x 4.0 gpm
20.0 4 min x 3.0 gpm
12.0 5 min x 2.0 gpm
10.0 Washer
12.5 gpcd (1/3 Toad)
12.5 11.5 gpcd (1/3 load)
11.5 11. 5 gpcd (I /3 load)
11.5 Kitchen
4 gpcd
4.0 4 gpcd
4.0 4 gpcd
4.0 Other
4 gpcd
4.0 4 gpcd
4.0 4 gpcd
4.0 Total
gpcd
68.0 Total
48.0 Total
37.5 Reduced shower use results from shorter and reduced flow. Reduced washer use results from fuller loads. 2 Fixtures include ULF 1.6 gpf toilets, 2.0 gpm showerheads, and efficient clothes washers.
6.5.2 Consumption Reduction Methods and Prohibitions
The City of Beaumont Water Use Regulations Ordinances (Appendices L -M) include prohibitions on various wasteful water uses such as washing sidewalks and driveways with potable water, and allowing plumbing leaks to go uncorrected more than 48 hours after customer notification.
6.5.3 Penalties or Charges
Any customer violating the regulations and restrictions on water use set forth in the Water Use Ordinance shall receive a written warning for the first such violation. Upon a second violation, the customer shall receive a written warning and the City may cause a flow- restrictor to be installed in the service. If a flow-restrictor is placed, the violator shall pay the cost of the installation and removal. Any willful violation occurring subsequent to the issuance of the second written warning shall constitute a misdemeanor and may be referred to the City of Beaumont Police Department for prosecution.
Table 6-5
Penalties and Charges
Examples of Penalties and Charges
Stage When Penalty May Take Effect
Penalties for not reducing consumption
4 Charges for excess use
_ 4
Flat fine
4 Charge per unit over allotment
4 Flow restriction
4 6.5.4 Water Use Restrictions for New Construction
In Stage 4, it may be necessary to discontinue all use of construction water (unless recycled water is used), even if a permit has been issued, and consider banning all use of water for nonessential uses, such as new landscaping and filling pools.
Beaumont -Cherry Valley Water District 6-6 August 6, 2002 2000 Urban Water Management Plan Section 6 — Water Shortage Contingency Plan
6.6 MONITORING WATER DEMANDS & USAGE TRENDS
The District keeps historic and current pumping records on all of its wells and implemented a computer accounting system on its customer's water usage. These records are then used to determine seasonal and annual fluctuations in water use. Within the District, since total water pumped closely approximates water use, the District can compare pumping records from one year to the next to determine actual reductions in water use. The District also, through its accounting system, is able to determine historic and current use by service account and therefore track customer usage during a drought and evaluate the effectiveness of each conservation measure implemented under this plan.
Beaumont -Cherry Valley Water District
6-7 August 6, 2002
2000 Urban Water Management Plan Section 6 — Water Shortage Contingency Plan
SECTION 7
WATER DEMAND MANAGEMENT MEASURES
7.1 LAW
1063'1. A plan shall be adopted in accordance with this chapter and shall do all of the following:
(f) Provide a description of the supplier's water demand management measures.
This description shall include all of the following:
(1) A description of each water demand management measure that is currently being implemented, or scheduled for implementation, including the steps necessary to implement any proposed measures, including, but not limited to, all of the following:
(A) Water survey programs for single-family residential and multifamily residential customers.
(B) Residential plumbing retrofit.
(C) System water audits, leak detection, and repair.
(D) Metering with commodity rates for all new connections and retrofit of existing connections.
(E) Large landscape conservation programs and incentives. (F) High -efficiency washing machine rebate programs.
(G) Public information programs.
(H) School education programs.
(I) Conservation- programs for commercial, industrial, and institutional accounts.
(J) Wholesale agency programs.
(K) Conservation pricing.
(L) Water conservation coordinator.
(M) Water waste prohibitions.
(N) Residential ultra -low -flush toilet replacement programs. (2) A schedule of implementation for all water demand management measures proposed or described in the plan.
(3) A description of the methods, if any, that the supplier will use to evaluate the effectiveness of water demand management measures implemented or described under the plan.
Beaumont -Cherry Valley Water District
7-1 August 6, 2002
2000 Urban Water Management Plan Section 7 — Water Demand Management Measures
(4) An estimate, if available, of existing conservation savings on water use within the supplier's service area, and the effect of such savings on the supplier's ability to further reduce demand.
(g) An evaluation of each water demand management measure listed in paragraph (1) of subdivision (f) that is not currently being implemented or scheduled for implementation. In the course of the evaluation, first consideration shall be given to water demand management measures, or combination of measures, which offer lower incremental costs than expanded or additional water supplies. This evaluation shall do all of the following:
(1) Take into account economic and noneconomic factors, including environmental, social, health, customer impact, and technological factors. (2) Include a cost -benefit analysis, identifying total benefits and total costs. (3) Include a description of funding available to implement any planned water supply project that would provide water at a higher unit cost. (4) Include a description of the water supplier's legal authority to implement the measure and efforts to work with other relevant agencies to ensure the implementation of the measure and to share the cost of implementation.
(h) Urban water suppliers that are members of the California Urban Water Conservation Council and submit annual reports to the council in accordance with the "Memorandum of Understanding Regarding Urban Water Conservation in California," dated September 1991, may submit the annual reports identifying water demand management measures currently being implemented, or scheduled for implementation, to satisfy the requirements of subdivisions (f) and (9)-
7.2 WATER DEMAND MANAGEMENT MEASURES
The District has implemented several water conservation measures beginning as early as the 1980 Immediate Needs Study. Presently the District is not signatory to the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) regarding Urban Water Conservation in California but the District does implement several of the Best Management Practices (BMP) identified in the MOU.
The District's 1986 Urban Water Conservation Plan (UWCP) took a list of conservation methods and assessed whether they were currently being implemented and, if not, what level of effort was required. This was also conducted for the District's 1990 UWCP and 1995 UWMP along with an initial screening and assessment. Table 7-1 lists a summary of conservation methods from the 1986 UWCP.
The 1986 and 1990 UWCPs focused on measures that reduced and/or regulated the water used for agricultural and landscape purposes. This was, and still is, the area with the greatest potential for water conservation. Such measures as the installation of drip irrigation systems and restructuring of water rates for irrigation have been implemented.
The conservation measures focused on in the 1990 UWCP took three approaches: system modification, conservation incentives, and public education. Because of the extent of orchard irrigation within the District, it was believed that the greatest potential for current water conservation through system modification existed in the conversion to drip irrigation systems. Other measures recommended were: the use of low flow equipment in Beaumont -Cherry Valley Water District 7-2 August 6, 2002 2000 Urban Water Management Pla�age 1950 0Sectiaa 7 — Water Demand Management Measures
Table 7-1
Status of 1986 Water Conservation Measures
1995 Current
Status Status
I. Education and Public Information
A. Local Water Conservation Advisory Committee X +
B. Conservation Literature
1. General Water Conservation Brochure O O+
2. Landscape Brochure with Plant List + +
3. Brochures for Specific Water Users + +
C. Previous Year's Use on Water Bills X X
1. Public Relations O O+
2. Public Speaking Presentations O O+
3. Demonstration Low Water -Using Landscapes X X
4. Promotional Campaign with Nurseries and Irrigators X X
5. Awards for Conservation Developments X X
D. Work with Large Water Users (Landscapers, Agriculture, + O+ and Parks)
E. In -School Education X +
F. Information on Federal and State Laws and Programs + + II. Water Management Programs
A. Water Loss Reduction Techniques
1. System -Wide Water Audit + O
2. Leak Detection Program
a. For BCVWD's System O O+
b. For Customer's Side X O+
3. Meter Calibration and Replacement Program O O+
4. Corrosion Control O O+
5. Valve Mapping and Exercising Program O O+
B. Metering Existing Customers O O+
C. DeviceDistribution + +
D. Meter Loan Program, Construction Water Users O O
E. Water Waste Prohibition O O
F. Conservation Pricing O O
G. Financial Incentives O O
III. Regulations
A. Environmental Impact Reports/Statements O O
B. Water Waste Reduction Program + +
C. Water Conservation Ordinances + +
1. Requirements for Large Water Users (Landscape, O O
Agriculture, and Parks)
2. Self -closing Faucets - Commercial and Institutional X X
3. Low Water -Using Landscapes X +
4. Metering New Customers O O
5. Ultra -low -flow Toilets X +
IV. Water Shortage Contingency Plan + _+
X = Recommended Implementation
+ = Recommend Increased Effort
O = Currently Implemented
O+= Continue to Implement
Beaumont -Cherry Valley Water District
7-3 August 6, 2002
2000 Urban Water Management Plan Section 7 — Water Demand Management Measures
new developments (i.e., ultra -low -flow water use toilets, shower flow restrictors, and self closing faucets), conservation incentives (which take the form of water rate increases and seem to have the greatest impact on reducing water consumption), and public education (which is used to emphasize a relationship between the individual consumer and the District). The latter also informs customers of conservation methods as well as instills conservation ethics.
As indicated in the 1995 UWMP, the District was and is experiencing much new land development, which previously was used for agricultural purposes. This land is in the process of being turned into commercial and residential uses.
The District is requiring developers to install separate recycled water pipelines to serve street medians, parks, playgrounds, schoolyards and common areas. Initially these areas will be served with potable water, but eventually will be converted over to recycled water.
In addition the District is looking for opportunities to use recycled water for other non - potable uses. For example, the District has an agreement with an existing concrete "ready. mix" plant to use recycled water as soon as it is available. This should occur within the next few years.
Table 7-2 summarizes and briefly describes the water demand management measures and indicates if the District in some form has implemented the measure.
Table 7-2
Recommended Water Demand Management Measure and Their Status as of 2000 Measure
Water Survey Audits for Single -Family
and Multi -Family Residential Customers
Residential Plumbing Retrofits
Distribution System Water Audits
Metering with Commodity Rates
Large Landscapes Conservation
Programs
High -Efficiency Washing Machine
Rebate
Definition
Implemented
(YIN)
Inspect for leaks in households and to improve N
the efficiency of landscape irrigation water use.
Replace devices with high efficiency (low flow) N
devices. Retrofitting of residential toilets and
showers with water saving devices.
Reduce system leakage. Repair pipes. Y
Test and replace defective meters. Meter all Y
new connections.
Review water irrigation techniques such as
water cycle times for golf courses, schools,
parks, and cemeteries. Establish rotating use
schedules for irrigation, which reduces the
impact of peak demands. Convert to recycled
water wherever possible.
Y
Customer rebates for high -efficiency N
(horizontal -axis) clothes washers.
Beaumont -Cherry Valley Water District 7-4 August 6, 2002 2000 Urban Water Management Plan Section 7 — Water Demand Management Measures
Table 7-2 (Continued)
Recommended Water Demand Management Measure and Their Status as of 2000 Measure
Public Information Programs
School Education Programs
Conservation Programs for Commercial
and Industrial Users
Wholesale Agency Assistance
Conservation Pricing
Conservation Coordinator
Water Waste Prohibitions
Ultra -Low -Flush Toilets
Definition
Describe and make available water
conservation information. Emphasize the
relationship between the individual consumer
water use to the total District water demand.
Implemented
(YIN)
Y
Teach water conservation methods and instill a Y
conservation ethics.
Evaluate existing sites water needs and Y
recommend water efficiency measures. Look
at opportunities to use recycled water.
Wholesale water suppliers to provide incentives N
or equivalent resources to benefit their retail
suppliers. The District is not a wholesale water
supplier.
Charge irrigators for actual amount of water
used. Eliminate reduced rate for irrigation
water.
Y
Designate a water conservation coordinator to N
promote and enforce conservation programs
Develop methods to prohibit gutter flooding and N
single pass cooling systems and develop
measures to encourage, recirculating water
systems in conveyor car wash, commercial
laundry systems, and in decorative fountains.
Incentive programs to replace high -water -using N
toilets.
Measures considered for this 2000 UWMP update fall into six categories: (1) inside residential, (2) industrial and commercial measures, (3) landscape measures, (4) distribution system measures, (5) public relation and education measures, and (6) pricing measures. The majority of the programs recommended will focus on regulating new developments. The new developments place additional strain on existing water supplies.
Water conservation measures are easiest and most cost effective to install in new construction because there are no removal or replacement costs. A large percent of the total population increase in the City of Beaumont in the next 10 to 15 years will be as a result of new development; therefore less emphasis is placed on measures involving existing residential, industrial, and commercial customers.
Beaumont -Cherry Valley Water District
2000 Urban Water Management Plan
7-5 August 6, 2002
Section 7 — Water Demand Management Measures
7.3 BMP 1 -WATER SURVEYS PROGRAMS FOR SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
AND MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL CUSTOMERS
The District presently does not implement this demand management measure in performing water audits for single-family and multi -family residential sites.
7.3.1 Implementation or Scheduled Implementation
The District's long range goal is to develop guidelines for implementing a water survey for single and multi -family residential customers. Initially this will be in the form of information items, bill stuffers, etc. to inform customers how to monitor their consumption. Some guidelines will be provided so those customers can compare themselves to a "baseline".
7.4 BMP 2 -RESIDENTIAL PLUMBING RETROFIT
Minimal (Limited) Kit Delivery Program; this type of kit may include a variety of water saving devices. A limited kit could contain shower flow restrictors, toilet tank displacement bag, and toilet tank leak detection dye tablets together with installation information, leak detection, and repair tips. These kits are intended for use in non - conserving showerheads and toilets in accordance with City and county ordinances.
7.4.1 Implementation or Scheduled Implementation
This measure is not presently implemented. The District will be considering providing Minimal (Limited) Kits in the implementation of such a measure for existing devices.
New residential construction already incorporates low flow fixtures.
7.4.2 Methods to Evaluate Effectiveness
The technology for each of the items in the kit has been successfully demonstrated.
Shower flow restrictors constrict the flow rate to 3 gpm compared to unrestricted showerheads that have a rated flow of 5 to 8 gpm. Toilet tank displacement bags lessen the amount of water used to flush by holding a small amount of water out of use. Non - conserving toilets fitted with tank displacement bags use 4.8 gallons per flush, versus 5.5 gallons per flush for non -conserving toilet. Toilet leaks are detected using leak detection tablets. The tablets are placed in the toilet tank, turning the water a bright color. If the water is leaking from the tank to the toilet bowl, the water in the toilet bowl will turn color.
7.4.3 Estimate of Existing Conservation Savings
This program is cost effective to consumers. The installation of these fixtures will reduce current water and wastewater flows significantly and will have direct economic benefits in deferred sewage treatment facility enlargement and deferred water supply alternatives.
Water and monetary savings offset the cost to the District and the consumer for the purchase and installation of the retrofit kits.
Beaumont -Cherry Valley Water District 7-6 August 6, 2002 2000 Urban Water Management Plan Section 7 — Water Demand Management Measures
7.5 BMP 3- SYSTEM WATER AUDITS, LEAKS DETECTION AND REPAIR Water distribution lines are routinely checked and/or tested for leaks; when leaks are found they are promptly repaired.
The distribution system water audit compares the amount of water produced (from wells, surface supplies) by the District to the amount of water used by consumers (as reported by metering readings). The difference is unmetered water. After allowing for authorized unmetered uses such as fire fighting, main flushing, and public use, it can be assumed that the remaining unmetered water is explained by inaccurate meter readings, malfunctioning valves and leakage, and theft.
7.5.1 Implementation or Scheduled Implementation
The District has an ongoing schedule to inspect facilities and periodically calibrate master water meters. The District has already implemented leak detection. Water system audits are generally done at least once a year
7.5.2 Methods to Evaluate Effectiveness
The District annually reviews data records to confirm that unaccounted for water losses stay within an acceptable range of 5% to 7%.
7.6 BMP 4 -METERING WITH COMMODITY RATES FOR ALL NEW
CONNECTIONS AND RETROFIT OF EXISTING CONNECTIONS
Purveyors are required to place water meters on all new service connections per California State law. The District fully meters all customer sectors.
7.6.1 Implementation or Scheduled Implementation
Prior to the 1980s, the District's method of billing on any land 0.81 acres or more was a fixed rate schedule independent of water use. In 1982 the District changed the billing method to reflect a varying rate structure based on water use.
The District presently replaces old meters under the Meter Exchange Program, which started in the early 1980s. The District continues to change out every meter on ten year intervals. The District plans to continue to conduct its meter calibration and replacement program.
7.6.2 Methods to Evaluate Effectiveness
Use daily District -wide pumping records to evaluate consumption. Utilize customer water bills to analyze water use consumption patterns.
7.7 BMP 5 -LARGE LANDSCAPE CONSERVATION PROGRAMS AND
INCENTIVES
Presently the City of Beaumont reviews, on a project -by -project basis, the conditions of approval for landscape practices. This approved Landscape Ordinance for New Construction encourages landscaping using low -water -using plants. Irrigation systems Beaumont -Cherry Valley Water District
7-7 August 6, 2002
2000 Urban Water Management Plan Section 7 — Water Demand Management Measures
with automatic controllers and valves are required on all commercial and industrial developments to control excessive water use. Landscaping practices that require excessive water use will be re-evaluated on a project -by -project basis.
The District also establishes rotating use of schedules for irrigation for those irrigation customers, which reduces the impact of peak demands. The District is encouraging the use of recycled water for these areas.
7.7.1 Implementation or Scheduled Implementation
The City of Beaumont's landscape ordinance has been implemented and in effect since 1995.
7.7.2 Methods to Evaluate Effectiveness
Water usage in new landscaped areas particularly during the typical dry months from May through September may be compared on a "per acre" basis with existing landscaped areas, which were not affected nor required prior to the implementation of the Landscape Ordinance.
Surveys, landscape information training, water bill historical water use and other programs will also assess effectiveness.
7.7.3 Estimate of Existing Conservation Savings
A 20 percent savings in water use through water efficient landscape is possible, compared to traditional landscaping water use for existing commercial, industrial, or governmental landscape.
7.7.4 Evaluation
Because many new developments are currently under construction, a current evaluation of the method has not been determined. However, future assessments should be possible to more accurately estimate the cost savings and water demand reduction of this method.
7.8 BMP 6 -HIGH -EFFICIENCY WASHING MACHINE REBATE PROGRAMS The District and the City of Beaumont presently do not have a rebate program in place for the replacement of old clothes washers.
7.9 BMP 7 -PUBLIC INFORMATION PROGRAMS
The District participates and exhibits at public events such as fairs to provide information and promote water conservation. At these events the District provides information on water consumption, costs, and water quality. The District also has available brochures that provide the general public with information on water quality and water conservation.
7.9.1 Implementation or Scheduled Implementation
The public information programs are ongoing and information is provided as needed.
Beaumont -Cherry Valley Water District 7-8 August 6, 2002 2000 Urban Water Management Planage 1956 otea t ng 7 — Water Demand Management Measures
7.10 BMP 8 -SCHOOL EDUCATION PROGRAMS
The District presently does not make a special effort to promote water conservation at local schools. Teachers at the schools may periodically discuss with students, awareness and importance of water conservation.
7.10.1 Implementation or Scheduled Implementation
District staff may consider coordinating with School District staff, events where information packets on water conservation and water savings techniques can be distributed to students.
7.11 BMP 9 -CONSERVATION PROGRAMS FOR COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL,
AND INSTITUTIONAL (CII) ACCOUNTS
The District does not make a special effort to audit water use by commercial and industrial users but does work with local commercial and industrial users to promote water conservation as needed particularly with recycled water use. The District "standard" metering practice for large commercial/industrial customers is to install multiple, parallel small diameter (2 -in) meters. These meters are more accurate at low flows than larger meters and provide an opportunity to monitor consumption.
Malfunctioning meters are easily detected. If any of the meters read "high" or "low" they are replaced. The District works with existing and new commercial and industrial users to determine if recycled water can be incorporated and used in their operation such as a concrete ready mix business.
7.11.1 Implementation or Scheduled Implementation
The District will continue to implement this measure on an as need basis.
7.11.2 Methods to Evaluate Effectiveness
Water bills show the water customer the amount of water used in previous billing period.
All commercial and industrial users are provided with historical usage on their bill. This allows customers to compare their water usage with the same period of the previous year and to monitor their water usage over time. The District is available to assist customers, if requested, to review methods to improve water use effectiveness.
7.12 BMP 10 -WHOLESALE AGENCY ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS
The District is not a wholesale water supplier and therefore does not provide financial assistance or resources to advance water conservation efforts to retail water suppliers.
7.13 BMP 11 -CONSERVATION PRICING
The District has eliminated a reduced water rate for high agricultural water users. These users pay the prevailing rate as set by the District for the volume of water used.
Beaumont -Cherry Valley Water District
7-9 August 6, 2002
2000 Urban Water Management Plan Section 7 — Water Demand Management Measures
7.13.1 Implementation or Scheduled Implementation
The District will continue to review their rate structure to eliminate non -conserving pricing structures.
7.13.2 Methods to Evaluate Effectiveness
Review billing records and pricing structures.
7.14 BMP 12 -CONSERVATION COORDINATOR
The District presently does not have a designated conservation coordinator.
7.14.1 Implementation or Scheduled Implementation
The District will review staff needs and make recommendation to the Board to possibly implement this measure. The District is a small agency and funding a full time water conservation coordinator would have significant financial impacts. The District will investigate opportunities to incorporate water conservation "duties" within the existing staffing or if this can be accomplished regionally through the STWMA.
7.15 BMP 13 -WATER WASTE PROHIBITION
Section 9.6 of the District's Rules Governing Water Service states the following:
It is a violation of these Regulations:
3) To cause or permit the waste of water from the water system or to maintain or cause or permit to be maintained any leaky outlets, apparatus or plumbing fixtures through which water is permitted to waste;
4) To use water for washing sidewalks and driveways in a manner that prevents the usual and customary use of public streets and sidewalks by others; 5) To permit water sprinklers to spray onto sidewalks and streets or to permit water to run from the consumer's property onto public sidewalks and streets to cause risk and/or damage to the public or to public and private property; Section 15 of the District's Rules Governing Water Service states the following:
No person, firm or corporation shall use, deliver, or apply waters received from this District in any manner that causes the loss, waste, or the application of water for unbeneficial purposes. Within the meaning of this Regulation, any waters that are allowed to escape, flow, and run into areas which do not make reasonable beneficial use of such waters, including but not limited to streets, gutters, drains, channels, and uncultivated lands, shall be presumed to be wasted contrary to the prohibitions of these Rules and Regulations.
The Regulations for Water Service have a series of warnings/penalties. The first notice is a written warning; the second offense results in a doubling of the water charges until full compliance is attained. After the third offense, the District can terminate water service to the customer.
7.15.1 Implementation or Scheduled Implementation
The District already has the ordinance regulation in place.
Beaumont -Cherry Valley Water District 7-10 August 6, 2002 2000 Urban Water Management Plan Section 7 — Water Demand Management Measures
7.16 BMP 14 -RESIDENTIAL ULTRA -LOW -FLUSH TOILETS (ULFT)
REPLACEMENT PROGRAMS
The California Code of Regulations, Title 24, regulated by Part 5 of the California Plumbing Code, which is a division of the California Building Standards, requires ULFTs in all new construction starting January 1, 1994. The District does not presently have a program for replacement or a rebate program for replacement of old pre -1994 toilets.
7.16.1 Implementation or Scheduled Implementation
The City of Beaumont requires all new construction and remodel projects to install ULFTs.
Beaumont -Cherry Valley Water District 7-11 August 6, 2002 2000 Urban Water Management Plan Section 7 — Water Demand Management Measures
SECTION 8
WATER RECYCLING
8.1 WASTEWATER SYSTEM DESCRIPTION
10633. The plan shall provide, to the extent available, information on recycled water and its potential for use as a water source in the service area of the urban water supplier. To the extent practicable, the preparation of the plan shall be coordinated with local water, wastewater, groundwater, and planning agencies and shall include all of the following:
10633 (a) A description of the wastewater collection and treatment systems in the supplier's service area...
The City of Beaumont's WWTP is within the service area of the District. The City of Beaumont is responsible for the collection and treatment of municipal wastewater.
Although the District is not responsible for wastewater collection and treatment, the District is coordinating with the City of Beaumont on recycle water projects for reuse of treated wastewater. The present capacity of the plant is approximately 1.5 million gallons per day (mgd). The City of Beaumont is presently making modifications and enhancements to the plant to increase the plant capacity to 2 mgd. The ultimate capacity of the plant will be approximately 8 mgd. It is not known at this time when the next major expansion to the plant is scheduled.
Raw wastewater from the City of Beaumont enters the plant and flows through a mechanical screening and flow metering facility before flowing to the influent pumping station. From there the wastewater is pumped to a pair of combination flow equalization/aeration basins for secondary treatment. The effluent from the equalization/aeration basins flows to two secondary clarifiers where the activated sludge is separated and returned to the equalization/aeration basins. The plant will incorporate a centrifuge system for dewatering in their current modifications. The clarified secondary effluent flows to two shallow bed, traveling bridge filters then through an ultraviolet light facility for final disinfection. The disinfected effluent then flows through a metering flume and down a stair -step cascade aeration channel to Coopers Creek, which is tributary to San Timoteo Creek. It should be noted that the outfall to Coopers Creek is outside and not tributary to the BSU. The plant currently meets Title 22 requirements for unrestricted use and will provide tertiary treated effluent for water recycling. Additions will be made at the treatment facility for recycled water pumping and for chlorine application to maintain water quality within the recycled water distribution system.
Beaumont -Cherry Valley Water District
8-1 August 6, 2002
2000 Urban Water Management Plan Section 8 — Water Recycling
8.2 WASTEWATER GENERATION, COLLECTION, AND TREATMENT
10633. The plan shall provide, to the extent available, information on recycled water and its potential for use as a water source in the service area of the urban water supplier. To the extent practicable, the preparation of the plan shall be coordinated with local water, wastewater, groundwater, and planning agencies and shall include all of the following:
10633 (a) A [...] quantification of the amount of wastewater collected and treated...
Table 8-1 summarizes the estimated wastewater generation and collection within the existing service area of the District and estimated flows through 2025 based on known developments. Wastewater generation includes all flows received by the City of Beaumont's WWTP and estimated flows to on -site collection systems. Table 8-2 indicates the present flows to the City of Beaumont's WWTP.
Table 8-1
Wastewater Generation and Collection
2000
2005
2010
2015
2020
2025
Wastewater collected and treated at City
of Beaumont WWTP
1.2 2.1
3.1 3.9
4.4 4.8
Units of Measure: Million Gallonsper Day (mgd)
Table 8-2
Wastewater Treatment
Treatment
Plant Name
Location
(City)
Average Daily
Flow (2000)
Maximum Daily
Flow (2000)
Est. Year of
Planned Build-
out i
Planned
Ultimate Avg.
Daily Flow
City of
Beaumont
WWTP
Beaumont
1.2 1.3
2050
8.0 Units of Measure: Million Gallons per Day (mgd)
8.2.1 Overview of the Recycled Water Plan
The City of Beaumont has expanded and upgraded its WWTP to a full reclamation facility. This is in response to the California Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), Santa Ana River Region to upgrade the level of treatment to allow continued discharge to Cooper's Creek, a tributary of San Timoteo Creek. In lieu of discharging effluent to the creek, the City of Beaumont and District, through the two party Cooperative Agreement, have agreed to implement a water recycling project, since the effluent limits for discharge to the creek currently are equivalent to that required for water recycling.
All of the arrangements have not been finalized, but at this point it is believed the City of Beaumont will operate the treatment facility and deliver treated water to the District for recycling. The District will own and operate the recycled water pumping stations, storage Beaumont -Cherry Valley Water District 8-2
2000 Urban Water Management Plan
August 6, 2002
Section 8 — Water Recycling
reservoirs and distribution piping. The District will then enter into agreements with various users, such as the City of Beaumont, Parks and Recreation District, Caltrans, Golf Courses, etc. for providing recycled water. The District will be responsible for metering and revenue collection as well as overall recycled water pumping, storage and distribution system operation and maintenance.
The District intends to serve recycled water to the full extent possible for non -potable uses and as permitted by law. This would make potable water, now used for irrigation, available for new development. As new development occurs, the new projects would include appropriate piping systems to permit the use of recycled water for irrigation of street medians, greenbelts, schools, parks and common areas. This concept then envisions limiting the use of potable quality water to potable water purposes to the extent practical. Surplus recycled water will be available during certain times of the year when normal irrigation demands are reduced. During these times, the surplus will be piped to spreading basins for surface spreading of recycled water for recharge to the BSU.
The recycled water system will be developed in phases to match both demand for recycled water and the availability of treated effluent to be recycled.
8.3 WASTEWATER DISPOSAL AND RECYCLED WATER USES
10633. The plan shall provide, to the extent available, information on recycled water and its potential for use as a water source in the service area of the urban water supplier. To the extent practicable, the preparation of the plan shall be coordinated with local water, wastewater, groundwater, and planning agencies and shall include all of the following:
10633 (a) A description of the [...] methods of wastewater disposal. 10633 (b) A description of the recycled water currently being used in the supplier's. service area, including but not limited to, the type, place and quantity of use.
10633 (c) A description and quantification of the potential uses of recycled water, including, but not limited to, agricultural irrigation, landscape irrigation, wildlife habitat enhancement, wetlands, industrial reuse, groundwater recharge, and other appropriate uses, and a determination with regard to the technical and economic feasibility of serving those uses.
10633 (d) The projected use of recycled water within the supplier's service area at the end of 5, 10, 15, and 20 years.
8.3.1 History of Water Recycling in the Service Area
The District has considered the use of recycled water to supplement the water supply for a number of years. As early as 1987 the District began discussing water recycling in earnest with the City of Beaumont and the Pass Agency.
In June of 1989 the District prepared an internal memorandum on the potential for using recycled water in the Pass area. The report discussed the installation and operation of a conceptual project, which included treatment facilities serving the cities of Banning and Beaumont. Included in this plan were conceptual alignments for recycled water distribution and storage facilities. The concept involved the formation of a Joint Powers Reclamation Agency with each city operating its own treatment facilities. The effluent Beaumont -Cherry Valley Water District
8-3 August 6, 2002
2000 Urban Water Management Plan Section 8 — Water Recycling
would be provided to the JPA for distribution. Surplus recycled water was proposed to be percolated into the ground for recharge.
In August of 1989 the cities of Beaumont and Banning along with the District sent letters to the Pass Agency to have the Pass Agency take the lead on the conceptual project.
Since that time, the District, the City of Beaumont and several large developers took the lead in developing a conceptual regional wastewater collection and reclamation study.
The District's Engineer completed the study in 1993. The plan envisioned a regional reclamation facility in San Timoteo Canyon in the vicinity of San Timoteo Canyon and Singleton Roads. The plan also envisioned continued use of the City of Beaumont's WWTP as a satellite reclamation plant. The current plan, however, is to keep the City of Beaumont's WWTP in operation supplying recycled water up to at least 8 mgd. Flow will not reach this level until well into the future.
With increasing interest in development in the City of Beaumont, the District and the City of Beaumont entered into a cooperative agreement that funded a new recycled water master plan from Community Facilities District Bonds. This work was completed as part of the 1995 Master Plan.
8.3.2 Type and Place of Recycled Water Currently Being Used At the present time treated wastewater is not being used to offset potable water demands.
Pipelines are being installed as development occurs in accordance with the District's Recycled Water Master Plan, which is presently being updated. Certain facilities need to be in place such as a booster station, chlorination facility, and water storage at the City of Beaumont's WWTP in addition to pipelines before water recycling can be begin. The chlorination facility is not for disinfection, but to provide a residual disinfectant in the recycled water to maintain water quality in the recycled water distribution system.
8.3.3 Recycled Water Quantity
Successful recycled water systems require the recycled water to be available not only in sufficient quantities, on demand, but also be of the highest quality possible.
With respect to quantity, the demand must not outpace the supply and sufficient storage must be provided to match hourly demand with supply.
Currently there is about 1.2 mgd of wastewater treated at the City of Beaumont's WWTP.
This water, once treated, is discharged into Coopers Creek, which is tributary to San Timoteo Creek. Because it provides a portion of the streamflow to San Timoteo Creek, the RWQCB has indicated that some portion of the flow should continue to be discharged to the creek. For purposes of this plan this is assumed to be 20 percent of the current discharge or about 0.25 mgd. Based on this there is currently about 0.95 mgd available for recycling. Other alternative mitigation measures may be implemented such that the total present flow from the wastewater treatment plant, 1.2 mgd, would be available for recycling. Any mitigation measures would require approval by the RWQCB.
The initial recycled water system, then, must be designed to serve only facilities, which require less than 1.2 mgd. As development occurs, the recycled water distribution system Beaumont -Cherry Valley Water District 8-4
2000 Urban Water Management Plan
August 6, 2002
Section 8 — Water Recycling
can be expanded to serve the ultimate plant capacity of 8 mgd.
8.3.4 Recycled Water Quality
Current users of potable water recognize the value of water quality; changes from potable water to recycled water are sometimes met with resistance, primarily due to the unknowns. These unknowns relate to both quality and quantity. Golf course superintendents are concemed about the mineral water quality and its impact on very sensitive grasses. Nursery owners are concerned about the impact of the water on sensitive ornamentals. School site administrators want to know how the play areas will react to recycled water.
8.3.4.1 Recycled Water Quality
Water quality parameters of interest to recycled water users are typically:
• Mineral content
• Metals
• Organics and pesticides
• Microbiological content
8.3.4.2 Mineral Content
The mineral content is extremely important to landscape irrigation, nursery users, irrigators and golf course superintendents. From an irrigation standpoint the important parameters are the total dissolved solids (TDS) concentration, the concentration of specific ions such as sodium, chloride, and boron; and the impact the use of the water will have on the soil structure as measured by the Sodium Adsorption Ratio (SAR) or the Modified SAR.
The mineral content is also of importance when groundwater recharge is considered. If the recycled water has excessive mineral content, the quality of the groundwater will eventually deteriorate. In groundwater recharge projects, the quality of the recharge water must be of such quality, that it will not cause the groundwater basin water quality objectives to be exceeded. Basin water quality objectives are established by the RWQCB and are published in the Basin Plan.
Table 8-3 presents a summary of the mineral quality characteristics of the wastewater currently being discharged by the City of Beaumont's WWTP between 1995 and 2001.
Beaumont -Cherry Valley Water District
8-5 August 6, 2002
2000 Urban Water Management Plan Section 8 — Water Recycling
Table 8-3
Recycled Water Mineral Quality (1995-2001)
RANGE
PARAMETER
UNITS
MIN
MAX
AVERAGE
Total Hardness as CaCO3
mg/L
150
200
177
Calcium (Ca)
mg/L
39 53
46 Magnesium (Mg)
mg/L
12 18
15 Sodium (Na)
mg/L
57 82
68 Potassium (K)
mg/L
11 14
12 Ammonium Nitrogen (NH4-N)
• mg/L
ND
8 0.62
Total Alkalinity as CaCO3
mg/L _
160
250
202
Hydroxide (OH)
mg/L
ND
<3
0 Carbonate (CO3)
mg/L
ND
3 2
Bicarbonate (HCO3)
mg/L
140
310
247
Sulfate (SO4)
mg/L
36 67
46 Chloride (CI I
mg/L
30 65
49 Nitrate Nitrogen (NO3-N)
mg/L
<1
20 7
Fluoride (F)
mg/L
0.4 2.0
0.66 Cyanide (CN)
mg/L
ND
0.02 <0.01
Total Phosphorus
mg/L
0.1 4.6
2.21 Nitrite Nitrogen (NO2-N)
mg/L
ND
0.8 0.18
Inorganic Nitrogen
mg/L
1 31
9 Total -Dissolved Solids (TDS)
mg/L
360
510
428
Total Organic Carbon (TOC)
mg/L
3 24
6 Sodium Adsorption Ratio
meq/L
2.0 2.5
2.2 Overall the mineral water quality of the recycled water is excellent. The TDS ranges from 360 to 510 mg/L with an average of 428 mg/L. The TDS of the District supplied groundwater ranges from 220 to 320 mg/L and averages about 260 mg/L. The water quality varies depending on the source i.e. Edgar Canyon supply or the BSU. Water from Edgar Canyon has slightly lower mineral concentration than water pumped from the BSU.
The recycled water concentration shows an increase of 168 mg/L from the supply water.
This is lower than that typically experienced and is reflective of the good quality water source and the predominately residential character of the wastewater.
The concentration of sulfates, chlorides and sodium in the recycled water, of concern to irrigators, averages 46, 49 and 68 mg/L, respectively. In the District supplied groundwater these concentrations average 30, 10 and 20 mg/L, respectively. The recycled water concentrations show an increase of 16, 39, and 48 mg/L from the supply water.
This is typical.
The SAR for the reclaimed water averages 2.2. SAR values less than 3 present a low risk Beaumont -Cherry Valley Water District 8-6
2000 Urban Water Management Plan
August 6, 2002
Section 8 — Water Recycling
of decreasing soil permeability with long-term use of the water.
This water can be used for irrigation without any fear of damage to grasses or landscaping.
The recycled water contains a total phosphorus (as P) of 2.2 mg/L and total inorganic nitrogen (as N) of 9 mg/L. This translates into a fertilizer equivalent of 6 lb. of P/acre/foot of water applied and 25 lb. of N/acre/foot of water applied. On the basis that 5 feet of water will be applied per year per acre, the recycled water will supply about 30 lb. of P/acre/year and 125 lb. of N/acre/year. Use of the recycled water for irrigation will reduce the need to purchase and apply chemical fertilizers.
8.3.4.3 Metals
Table 8-4 presents the quality of the recycled water in terms of metals. Metals are present in only trace amounts and all comply with the maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) set for potable water.
The boron concentration ranges from <0.1 to 0.3 mg/L with an average of 0.22 mg/L.
Boron is of concern in concentrations above about 0.75 mg/L.
8.3.4.4 Organics and Pesticides
Organics and pesticides are essentially below detection levels except for chloroform.
Chloroform is a disinfection by-product formed during the disinfection process using chlorine and is a trihalomethane (THM). The WWTP uses ultraviolet disinfection so chloroform levels should be minimal. The chloroform concentration in recent samples was below 30 µg/L. The drinking water MCL for total trihalomethanes is 80 µg/L and hence the concentration in the recycled water would not appear to be of concern.
The total organic carbon (TOC) in the recycled water ranges from 3 to 24 mg/L with an average value of 6 mg/L. TOC is an important consideration in groundwater recharge involving recycled water because it is reflective of refractory organic material, which was not removed in the treatment process. This level of TOC may be an issue in groundwater recharge and some additional effluent "polishing" may be required.
8.3.4.5 Microbiological Content
The regulations for recycled water use are based on producing virus and pathogen free water. The upgraded and expanded WWTP will provide recycled water that meets these objectives.
Beaumont -Cherry Valley Water District
8-7 August 6, 2002
2000 Urban Water Management Plan Section 8 — Water Recycling
Table 8-4
Recycled Water Metal Concentrations (1995-2001)
RANGE
PARAMETER _
UNITS
MIN
MAX
AVERAGE
Antimony (Sb) _
pg/L _
<1
2 <1
Arsenic (As)
_ pg/L _
<1
5 1
Barium (Ba I _
pg/L_
<20
24 _
<20
Beryllium (Be)
pg/L. _
<10
<10
<10
Boron (B)
mg/L
_ _ <0.1
0.3 0.22
CadmiumjCd)
pg/L
<1
1 <1
Total Chromium (Cr)
µg/L
<10
10 <10
Cobalt (Co,
pg/L
<10
<10
<10
Copper (Cu)
pg/L
<10
15 <10
Iron (Fe)
nglL
<20
110
20 Lead (Pb)
pg/L
<1
13 1
Manganese (Mn)
pg/L
<10
10 <10
Mercury (Hg)
µg/L
<0.5
0.5 <0.5
Nickel (Ni)
pg/L
<20
20 <20
Selenium (Se)
pg/L
<1
7 <1
Silver (Ag)
pg/L
<10
10 <10
Thallium (TI)
pg/L
<5
200
<5
Zinc (Zn)
pg/L
35 150
60 8.3.4.6 Projected Water Quality
When the newly upgraded WWTP is on-line, it is expected that most of the mineral water quality constituents will not vary appreciably from those in Table 8-3. However, there could be a change in some of the constituents if treated SWP water is used in the service area for potable water.
SWP water contains higher concentrations of TDS, chlorides and sulfates than does the local groundwater. Table 8-5 presents data on the variation of these constituents in. the SWP water from Silverwood Reservoir, the water source for the Pass Agency.
The variations of water quality are substantial and depend on the water supply conditions in Northern California. Drought conditions result in more intrusion of poor quality water into the Sacramento -San Joaquin River Delta, the source of the SWP exports. The expected value shown in Table 8-5 is not an average but rather is reflective of conditions believed to be representative in the future.
Beaumont -Cherry Valley Water District 8-8
2000 Urban Water Management Plan
August 6, 2002
Section 8 — Water Recycling
Table 8-5
State Water Project Water Quality
Parameter
_ Units _
Range
Expected
350
TDS
_ mg/L
_
100 - 400
Chloride
mg/L
10 -150
120
Sulfate
_ mg/L 1
30 -120
_
_ 80
If SWP water is used in the District water supply system, the concentrations of TDS, chlorides and sulfates in the recycled water will increase slightly; the amount of increase depends on the proportion of SWP water used. Most likely the water supply for the service area in the future will consist of a blend of local groundwater and SWP water, so the anticipated concentrations of TDS, chlorides and sulfates in the recycled water will be 490, 115 and 70 mg/L, respectively versus the 428, 49, and 46 mg/1 respectively, currently experienced in the City of Beaumont's WWTP effluent.
8.3.5 Potential Uses of Recycled Water
8.3.5.1 Irrigation and Other Direct Uses
At the present time the only potential recycled water uses envisioned are those related to irrigation of freeway medians, golf courses, cemeteries, parks, playgrounds and schoolyards. Recycled water used for those purposes shall be disinfected tertiary recycled water. (Strictly speaking the irrigation of freeway medians and cemeteries only needs to be disinfected secondary effluent. Treating only a portion of the effluent to meet those reduced requirements is impractical and furthermore would require a separate piping system to distribute the water to those users.)
In the future the recycled water system could be expanded to irrigate cherry and other fruit orchards. The proposed requirement for this use is disinfected tertiary recycled water also. It is anticipated that future demand for irrigation of fruit trees will diminish as the orchards are replaced with other land uses.
The City of Beaumont's WWTP already produces effluent, which meets Title 22 requirements for unrestricted use. There are, however, a number of use area requirements and facility design requirements. These requirements assume disinfected tertiary recycled water is used.
1. No irrigation shall take place within 50 feet of any domestic, including municipal, water supply well and no impoundment shall occur within 100 feet of any domestic well.
2. Any irrigation runoff shall be confined to the use area and shall not enter a dwelling, outdoor eating area or a food handling facility. Drinking water fountains shall be protected against contact with recycled water spray, mist or runoff.
Irrigation of parks, playgrounds and schoolyards usually requires irrigation during the nighttime hours.
Beaumont -Cherry Valley Water District 8-9 August 6, 2002 2000 Urban Water Management Plan Section 8 — Water Recycling
3. Recycled water use areas shall be posted with signs.
4. There shall be no physical connection between any recycled water system and a potable water system. Only an air gap separation is permitted on back-up supplies.
5. The recycled water system shall not have any hose bibs. Only quick couplers different from those used on the potable water system are permitted.
6. A reduced pressure principle backflow prevention device shall be placed on the potable water supply connection to each reuse area.
7. A detailed recycled water use report shall be prepared. This report shall contain • A detailed description of the use site including the person(s) responsible for operation and maintenance of the system,
• Piping layout including backflow prevention devices, and • Methods used by the recycled water supplier to ensure no cross connections.
8.3.5.2 Groundwater Recharge by Surface Spreading
The following requirements, excerpted from the "Draft, dated April 23, 2001, Groundwater Recharge Reuse Regulations," affect the design and operation of a proposed recycled water project.
1. All reclaimed water shall be from a wastewater collection system operated under a comprehensive industrial pretreatment and pollutant source control program.
The City of Beaumont will have this in place, as it is part of the overall wastewater discharge permit.
2. Requires that the recycled water be oxidized, filtered and disinfected.
Essentially this is a filtered and disinfected secondary effluent. This is basically the same quality required for direct discharge to San Timoteo Creek. The current level of treatment meets this requirement.
Some polishing supplementary refractory organics removal may be needed.
3. The average quantity of recycled water in each aquifer shall be specified by the Department of Health Services. The amount will be a function of the TOC in the recycled water. The recycled water TOC shall not exceed 0.001 g TOC/L divided by the recycled water fraction, i.e., the fraction of the total aquifer that is recycled water.
4. Recycled water shall be retained underground a minimum of 6 months prior to being withdrawn at a domestic (municipal) water supply well.
5. The minimum horizontal separation between a surface spreading area and a domestic (municipal) water supply well shall be 500 feet.
6. A detailed engineering report shall be prepared and contain the following information as a minimum:
• A plan of the treatment, storage, transmission, spreading and monitoring facilities, Beaumont -Cherry Valley Water District 8-10
2000 Urban Water Management Plan
August 6, 2002
Section 8 — Water Recycling
• A project description,
• A detailed hydrogeologic study to address the aquifer travel time, percent recycled water intercepted by domestic wells, water quality impacts, etc., • A description of the operation and maintenance personnel, their qualifications, experience and responsibilities,
• A description of project operation including a contingency plan to preclude the recharge of water when conditions or quality does not meet requirements, • A determination of anticipated TOC and total nitrogen levels, and • A detailed mound monitoring plan.
Based on the requirements established above, there does not appear to be any reason why the surface spreading of recycled water would not be permitted.
8.3.6 Potential Recycled Water Demands
Table 8-6 summarizes the potential recycled water users in 5 -year increments through 2025. To serve all of these users would involve a very extensive distribution and storage network. It is envisioned that the recycled water system could serve the entire area eventually.
Table 8-6
Potential Recycled Water Demands (2005 - 2025)
Year 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025
Recycled Water. (Dist. Cust.) Potable 0.2 0.3 0.6 1.0 1.0 Water *Offset?
Recycled Water Exchanges for Potable 0.7` 2.3d 4.0e 4.0 4.0 Water Offsetsb
Recycled Water Recharge - 0_3 0_3 0_3 0_4
TOTALS 0.9 2.9 4.9 5.3 5.4
Units of Measure: Million Gallons per Day (mgd)
a Estimated offset demand for irrigation of parkways, medians, cemeteries, and parks. b Estimated offset demand for irrigation of golf courses. c Oak Valley Golf Course.
d Oak Valley, Highland Springs North, and PGA Golf Courses. e Oak Valley, Highland Springs North, and PGA Golf Courses and Sunny Cal Egg Ranch.
Table 8-7 summarizes the comparison of recycled water available from the City of Beaumont's WWTP and the projected recycled water demands through 2025. It is estimated that by 2015 and beyond that the demand for recycled water will be greater than the supply. It may be possible for the District to work with neighboring agencies (e.g.
YVWD) to increase the recycled water supply.
Beaumont -Cherry Valley Water District
8-11 August 6, 2002
2000 Urban Water Management Plan Section 8 — Water Recycling
Table 8-7
Projected Recycled Water Supply and Projected Recycled Water Demands Comparison (2005 — 2025)
Year 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025
Projected Available Recycled Water 1.9 2.9 3.7 4.1 4.6
Supply for Reusea
Projected Recycled Water Demand 0.9 2.9 4.9 5.3 5.4
Units of Measure: Million Gallons per Day (mgd)
a Available supply equals total wastewater plant flows Tess 0.25 mgd flow to Coopers Creek.
8.4 CITY OF BEAUMONT RECYCLED WATER ORDINANCES
The City of Beaumont has adopted several ordinances regulating the use of recycled water. The City of Beaumont, in conjunction with the District, has adopted polices such that when recycled water becomes available, recycled water will be used for non -potable uses such as irrigation of landscape medians, cemeteries, golf courses, and parks. The City of Beaumont also has ordinances that adopt the District's UWMP and the water conservation measures and procedures stated in the UWIVIP. The City of Beaumont's ordinances applicable to recycled water are attached in Appendices L, M, and N.
Beaumont -Cherry Valley Water District 8-12
2000 Urban Water Management Plan
August 6, 2002
Section 8 — Water Recycling
Plan of Services
PLAN OF SERVICES
For
NOBLE CREEK VISTAS
PREPARED FOR
BEAUMONT CHERRY VALLEY
WATER DISTRICT
December 2003
PREPARED BY:
PARSONS
100 West Walnut Street
Pasadena, CA 91124
BEAUMONT CHERRY VALLEY WATER DISTRICT
PLAN OF SERVICES
for
NOBLE CREEK VISTAS
November 20, 2003
Introduction
Noble Creek Vistas (Project) is requesting annexation to the Beaumont Cherry Valley Water District (District) for their project. The.Project will consist of a total of 965 single-family residential dwelling units, 20 acres for a middle school, and 50 acres of parks/open space. The general location of the Project is in a portion of the east half of Section 33, T2S, R1 W SBB&M and a portion of the west quarter of Section 34, T2S, R1W SBB&M within the unincorporated area of Riverside County at the northerly limits of the city of Beaumont. The Project is within the city of Beaumont's Sphere. of Influence and will ultimately be annexed to the city of Beaumont. Beaumont Avenue borders the Project on the east, Brookside Avenue on the north, Oak View Drive (Nancy Avenue) and future Noble Creek Parkway on the west, and Oak Valley Parkway (formally 14th Street) on the south. The annexation area consists of approximately 333 acres of currently undeveloped dry farming land. The Project will be served from the District's 2850 (Intermediate) Pressure Zone.
Tentative tracts have been developed for a portion of the project. They are:
Tract No. 28988 — 201 Residential Lots
Tract No. 29267 — 333 Residential Lots
Tract No. 29522 — 298 Residential Lots
There is a portion of the Project that has not been identified as a tentative tract but consists of 133 residential lots.
This Plan of Services utilizes information from the District's 1994 Water System Master Plan Update, which addresses water demands and master planned facilities for the project. This master plan is currently being updated. Land use information was obtained from the Riverside County General Plan, the city of Beaumont Planning Department's General Plan and Noble Creek Vistas Specific Plan Draft Environmental Impact Report, dated. September 2001. The Project is zoned for single family residential development. The site currently consists of agricultural land and open space traversed by several natural runoff gullies. The tentative schedule for the Project has a start date of approximately 2003 with an estimated completion date of 2006-2007.
1 of 14
POS_NobleCkVistas DOC
Overall Project Water System Improvements
The Project will be served from the District's 2850 (Intermediate) Pressure Zone. The proposed Noble Creek Vistas development is located outside of the District's existing service boundary. The District currently has no existing facilities to support the development of the Project. The ,required backbone pipeline facilities to serve potable and recycled water to the overall Project include the following and are shown in Exhibits A-1 and A-2:
2850 (Intermediate) Pressure Zone
Pipelines
1. Approximately 1,625 LF 8" in future "M". Street (Tract No. 28988)/"Y" Street (Tract No. 29267) from an existing 12" connection point in Cougar Way north to future Noble Creek Parkway.
Approximately 1,705 LF 12" in the future Noble Creek Parkway from future "M" Street (Tract No. 28988)P'Y" Street (Tract No. 29267) to a connection point at.
Brookside and Beaumont Avenues.
3. Approximately 3,250 LF 16" in Brookside Avenue from Beaumont Avenue to Oak View Drive.
4. Approximately 1,280 LF 12" in Beaumont Avenue from an existing 12" connection point approximately 1,320 LF north of Oak Valley Parkway (formally 14`" Street) to Cougar Way.
5. Approximately 1,100 LF 8" in Cougar Way from an existing 12" connection point to future Noble Creek Parkway.
6. Approximately 2,830 LF 12" in future Noble Creek Parkway from Cougar Way to Oak Valley Parkway and Elm Street with a connection to the existing 10" water main in Oak Valley Parkway.
7. Approximately 100 LF 16" in Brookside Avenue from a connection point 100 feet east of Beaumont Avenue to Beaumont Avenue.
8. Reconnect 10" in Oak Valley Parkway. and 12" in Beaumont Avenue to the 2850 Pressure Zone.
2. All other in -tract pipelines shall be minimum 8 -inch mains.
All pipes shall be ductile iron pipe with push -on joints. The minimum pressure class of the pipe shall be Class 150. In addition, the applicant shall install fire hydrants or 4 -inch blow - offs at the end of all lines in cul-de-sacs for line flushing.
The applicant shall install standard 6 -inch fire hydrants with one 4" and two 2 1/2" outlets "super head" fire hydrants in accordance with District standards. The Fire Marshall shall approve all fire hydrant locations.
The applicant shall install 1" copper services from the water main to and including angle meter stop and coupling fitting for each residential lot in accordance with District's standard 2of14
POS _NobleCk V istas. DOC
drawings and specifications. All service laterals shall be located horizontally a minimum of 5 feet off property lines and minimum 10 feet clear of all sewer laterals Recycled Water System Improvements
Pipelines
1: Approximately 3,250 LF 16" in Brookside Avenue from Beaumont Avenue to Oak View Drive with a connection to the existing 16" recycled water line in Oak View Dr.
2. Approximately 1,705 LF 16" in the future Noble Creek Parkway from future "M" Street (Tract No. 28988)/"Y" Street (Tract No. 29267) to the intersection of Brookside and Beaumont Avenues.
3. Approximately 1,625 LF 16" in future "M" Street (Tract No. 28988)/"Y" Street (Tract No. 29267) from an existing connection point in Cougar Way north to future Noble Creek Parkway.
4. Approximately 1,500 LF 8" in future Noble Creek Parkway from Cougar Way to the existing Southern California Edison easement.
Additional recycled distribution water lines shall be installed to all parks, green belt, and other landscape areas.
All recycled water pipes shall be ductile iron pipe with push -on joints and bagged with purple polyethylene bags per AWWA standards. The minimum pressure class of the pipe shall be Class 150. All above -ground appurtenances shall be color coded per AWWA standards.
Signs shall be posted around the use area notifying that recycled water is being used and it is unsafe to drink. All signage shall be installed in accordance with AWWA standards.
It is noted that the Beaumont Unified School District recently constructed a 12 -inch potable water line and 16" recycled water line in Cougar Way from Beaumont Avenue west to the westerly boundary of the proposed middle school.
Recent Legislation
As development increases, the need for additional potable water sources will increase.
The District is actively pursuing additional water sources to meet the future demands within the District's service area. Recently passed legislation, effective January 1, 2002, includes Senate Bill No. 221, ("Kuehl") which stipulates that legislative bodies of a city, county, or public water system provide written verification that a sufficient water supply is available prior to completion of a project/subdivision. A subdivision is defined in the Kuehl Bill as "a proposed residential development of more than 500 dwelling units for a public water system with 5,000 services connections or more" which is applicable to the District. Senate Bill No. 610, ("Costa") requires the water supplier to prepare a water supply assessment. The above legislation bills are applicable to this Project.
3of14
POS_NobleCk V istas. DOC
Additional information to support this Plan of Services as required by LAFCO's Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000 is provided below.
Beaumont Cherry Valley Water District Background
Beaumont Cherry Valley Water District (District) was first formed in April 1919, to provide domestic and irrigation water to the new community of Beaumont and the surrounding area. The District was originally named the Beaumont Irrigation District. In 1973 the name was changed to the Beaumont Cherry Valley Water District. However, even though the name has changed, the District's authority comes from the Irrigation District Law of the State of California.
The District's present service area covers about 10 square miles, virtually all of which is in Riverside County. The District's ultimate service planning area encompasses an area of about 40 square miles. (See Exhibit "B" attached)
Water Supply
The District presently extracts water from two local groundwater sources to meet the District's water demand, Edgar Canyon and the Beaumont Basin. The table below shows the total amount of water extracted over the previous five years from the two sources.
Year
Groundwater Production
(ac-ft/yr)
2002
- 8,025
2001
7,134
2000
6,308
1999
5,887
1998
4,874
The Beaumont Basin is a very large groundwater source that the United States Geological Survey (USGS) estimates contains approximately 1.1 million acre-feet of groundwater in storage.
This mid 1960s estimate was based on existing well data at the time. The report has been the basis for a general consensus that the base of useable water was 1,000' Below Ground Surface (BGS). The District, however has recently drilled a new test well in the Beaumont Basin at the District's newest recharge site to a depth of 1,500 feet BGS. As part of a draft report titled "Geohydrologic Investigation Noble Creek Artificial Recharge Study", dated July 1, 2002 prepared by Geoscience, (Appendix I, attached as Exhibit No. 1), results from pump test data suggests that high quality groundwater with a lower Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) and a different water chemistry exists in large quantities below the USGS previously theorized 1,000' base.
Other deep wells drilled by Southern California Professional Golfers Association (SCPGA), Oak 4 of 14
POS_NobleCkV istas. D0C
Valley Greens and the Sunnycal Egg Ranch show that the deep source is relatively wide spread throughout the Beaumont Basin. This additional volume of water in storage greatly increases the reliability ofthe •District's groundwater supply as presently believed.
Based on District studies and those prepared by San Gorgonio Pass Water Agency (Agency) and the San Timoteo Watershed Management Authority (STWMA), it is estimated that the long-term safe yield for the Edgar Canyon is 1,800 ac-ft/yr and Beaumont Basin is about 10,000 ac-ft/yr. These volumes should only be considered as estimates as the deep aquifer yields from the Beaumont Basin were not considered in these studies.
In 1902 the District's predecessor, Beaumont Land and Water Company (Company) began diversions of water in the Little San Gorgonio Creek and Noble Creek to supplement irrigation water demands using surface water rights that the Company had purchased .with land accusations along the creeks. The Company also purchased down stream riparian water rights to allow full use of the surface flows of the creeks. The District's first shallow wells were built about this same time (1902) -to augment surface water supplies and to provide a more reliable water supply to the growing community. As the wells came on line the Company began to impound the stream flows to recharge shallow aquifers the wells pumped from. This diversion has continued throughout the twentieth century and continues today. Through the last twenty or so years the District has closely monitored diversions and extractions determining- that more water is recharged than is pumped from the canyon supply. The USGS in cooperation with the District and the San Gorgonio Pass Water Agency, has recently determined in a currently unpublished USGS report, that the recharged groundwater in the Little San Gorgonio Creek Canyon does not flow underground into the Beaumont Basin presumably because of the existing geology underlying alluvial fill in the canyon areas fhe District uses for recharge.
To augment existing water sources, which is presently totally groundwater extractions and capture lost recharge from the canyon recharge efforts, the District is developing a project that will capture stormwater flows in Little San Gorgonio and Noble Creeks and deliver the flows, through a pipeline, to recharge basins directly overlying the Beaumont Basin. A District engineering study titled "Resource Development —Surface Water Capture for Little San Gorgonio Creek and Other Locations", amended December 10, 2001 (attached as Exhibit No. 2) discusses in detail the recharge and recovery project. The recharge site will also be able to receive State Project Water from San Gorgonio Pass Water Agency for groundwater recharge and may be used for conjunctive use projects discussed later in this section. The estimated yearly average long- term capture of stormwater flows is 4,100 ac-ft/yr.
With projects like Noble Creek Vistas coming on line, the District has secured funding for the engineering design, completed a $1.6 million dollar recharge study, Exhibit No. 1, taken possession of the 78 acre recharge site that will be developed as a park/recharge facility and has completed the environmental impact report titled "Groundwater Recharge Program", March 2003 (attached as Exhibit No. 3) for the recharge project.
5of14
POS NobleCkVistas.D0C
The District in cooperation with the City of Beaumont is also developing a recycled water distribution system for delivery of recycled water from the City's treatment facility. Currently the annual irrigation water demand supplied by the District is estimated to be approximately 1,100 ac-ft/yr, which includes irrigation of parks, schools, green belt areas, and a golf course. In addition it is estimated that about 4,000 ac-ft/yr of potable water is used to irrigate various golf courses in the area which will eventually be converted to recycled water as discussed in the District's 1994 Master Plan. Once these golf courses are converted, the current groundwater demand for irrigation would then be available to the District to meet domestic demands. These golf courses consist of three championship golf courses in the District's service area that pump from the Beaumont Basin, a smaller golf course, which is served by the District and a second small course served by a well outside of the Beaumont Basin in Marshall Canyon. One. of the smaller golf courses is also receiving water from springs located northeast of the developed area of Cherry Valley. The District current recycled water plan also envisions recycled water service to the Banning Sun Lakes course.
The City of Beaumont estimates that the average annual wastewater collected per EDU is
0.19 gpm/EDU (0.31 ac-ft/yr/EDU.) This statistic indicates, when compared to the District's actual average deliveries of water to individual EDU on 10,000 square foot lots or less (.61 ac ft/yr/EDU) that 50% of the water delivered to an EDU is recycled under the new system plan.
Portions of the recycled water system have recently been completed and pipeline construction continues as developing lands come on line.
The use of recycled water for the parks, golf courses, and other open space areas will "free -up" available potable water, which is presently being used for irrigation. It is estimated that presently there is approximately 800 acre-feet of recycled water available at the City of Beaumont's Wastewater Treatment Plant. The City -is currently building a plant expansion that includes a reservoir for storage of recycled water at the plant along with a booster station to pump recycled water through the District's recycled water distribution system.
The District is currently constructing recycled water transmission mains for delivery of recycled water to existing irrigation users. The District is also installing a recycled water distribution system as new development occurs. The District continues to collect a Recycled Water Facility Fee from each new EDU to finance the improvements. This fee is providing the necessary capital for the District and the City of Beaumont to complete the recycled water system as development occurs. First deliveries of recycled water to the District's recycled water distribution system in the southern portion of the District will begin in late 2004 or early 2005.
The City of Beaumont and the District are also working together with developers throughout the District's service area to develop four "Incidental Recharge" areas. The largest of which is on Noble Creek that runs through the Noble Creek Vistas project. These areas will be developed to capture urban storm runoff for recharge to the groundwater basin. They.will also be used for blending storm flows with surplus recycled water during winter months. The Noble Creek site may also be used to recharge various additional supplies that may be available from the District's recharge facility located directly up stream and adjacent to Noble Creek Vistas proj ect.
6of14
POS_NobleCkVistas DOC
The District in August 2002 approved its latest update to the "Urban Water Management Plan" (UWMP) (attached as Exhibit No. 4) which provides a complete detail of the District water resource plan and explains the where and how the District plans to serve development in the District's Sphere of Influence through 2025. This plan was certified by the California Department of Water Resources in 2003. Table 2-2 from the UWMP forecasts the water supply that the District will rely on as we move through the first 25 years of the 21 -century. Based on the District's resource development plan, the District will reduce its dependency on the Beaumont 'Basin, which currently is relied on for most of pur water supply and limit the District's reliance on State Project Water to approximately 20% of the District's overall water demand.
Development of the water resources shown in Table 2-2 are dependent on development within the District's Sphere of Influence as it is the developing lands that will provide a majority of the funding for the expansion of the District's future water resources.
Table 2-2
Current and Projected Available Water Supplies — Development Basis Water Supply Sources
2000a
2005
2010
2015
2020
2025
SWP Via Pass Agency (Estimated Available)
0 5,000
5,000
• 5,000
5,000
5,000
Groundwater Extractions (Edgar Canyon)
2;671
1,800
1,800
1,800
1,800
1,800
Groundwater Extractions (BSU)
3,637 __
3,500
3,500
3,500
3,500
3,500
Return Flows from Septic Systems
0 280
350
400
460
520
Urban Runoff/Groundwater Recharge
0 400
1,000
1,100
1,200
_
1,300
Captured Infiltration
(shallow groundwater)
0 0
300
300
300
300
Stormwater Capture / Groundwater
Recharge
0 2,600
4,100
4,100
4,100
4,100
Recycled Water Users -Well Transfers
0 800
2,600
4,500
4,500
4,500
Recycled Water Supply / Use
0 1,000
3,200
4,100
4,600
_
5,100
Total Forecasted
6,308
15,380
21,850
24,800
25,460
26,120
Units of Measure: Acre-feet/Year
a Current water supply indicates actual water production for year 2000 and may not include all available water supply. b Includes 500 AFY estimated urban runoff at Cherry Ave and Brookside Ave starting around 2010. c Acquisition of potable water supply wells from potential recycled water users as they become District customers. d Recycled water supply that would be in demand for non -potable use by various potential users including but not limited to: Oak Valley Greens -800 AFY, Oak Valley Goff and Resort (SCPGA)-800'2 AFY, Highland Springs North -200 AFY, SunnyCal- 1900 AFY.
Additional sources of water for future development also include increased return flows from the development of lands overlying the Beaumont Basin. The San Timeteo Watershed Management Authority (STWMA) discussed later in this section is currently developing a study funded by STWMA and the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board that will study the relationship between recharge from vacant lands and developed lands that are irrigated regularly (lawn watering, golf course watering etc.). It will also give a better indication of the water supply that is being developed by the capture of runoff from impervious areas of both existing and 7 of 14
POS_\obleCkVistas D0C
newly developing areas, which will better quantify the available water that is delivered to an EDU and returned to the groundwater source as return flow.
Based on the water projected forecast shown on Table 2-2, 80% of the District water demand will be supplied by local water sources as the various projects funded by development are constructed. The additional 20% of the District's water demand necessary for new development will be supplied by imported water that will come through a new water system that was built by the Department of Water Resources (DWR) in cooperation with the San Gorgonio Pass Water Agency (Agency).
Currently the Agency has an entitlement for import of 17,300 acre-feet of water from the State Water Project (SWP). It also has a requirement by Law to prioritize water delivered to offset overdraft that may exist in any agency or district receiving water.
Following is an excerpt from Chapter 101 of the San Gorgonio Pass Water Agency Law as stated in the California State Water Code Appendix:
"§ 101 —15.5 Allocation of water from state water project Sec. 15.5. It is the intent of the Legislature that, in allocating water received from the State Water Project pursuant to this act, the highest priority shall be given to eliminating groundwater overdraft conditions within any agency or district receiving the water." The District, City of Beaumont, and the Agency are currently working out the details for an agreement for the purchase of 2,000 acre-feet of State Project Water for delivery to the District's service area for recharge of the groundwater area and irrigation deliveries to golf courses, schools, parks and green belt areas, and to offset existing overdraft. Along with the 2,000 acre-feet of water to be purchased by the District and City, the Agency will deliver to the District's non -potable water system an additional in -lieu water SPW delivery of 2,000 acre-feet for existing irrigation demands and for recharge at the District's recently acquired 78 acre recharge site at the corner of Beaumont and Brookside Avenues. Construction is under way on the first portion of the system, which will be in operation as early as summer 2004. This will serve the Oak Valley Greens golf course, the new high school and elementary school, the City of Beaumont Sports Park and green belt areas in the Oak Valley Greens and Noble Creek development areas. This first delivery will reduce the potable water pumped from the basin by approximately 1,200 acre-feet.
The remainder of the 4,000 acre-feet of SWP water delivered to the District will be recharged at one of two District recharge sites (the existing District site in upper Cherry Valley or the new site in lower Cherry Valley). With development funds from the various projects in the District, including Noble Creek Vistas, the District in cooperation with the City of Beaumont, will complete the next phase of the non -potable/ recycled water system in 2004-2005 to SCPGA and the City of Banning's Sun Lakes Golf .Courses which will further reduce the use of potable water from the Beaumont Basin for irrigation. As more new development comes on line more recycled water will become available (approximately .30 acre-feet per EDU per year) to further reduce the SWP water demand for irrigation. This will increase the recharge of SWP water in to the Beaumont Basin until there is enough development to finance completion of the District's 8of14
POS_ NobleCkVistas.DOC
Water Treatment Facility for direct deliveries of SWP water to the District's potable water system. The District currently has about $3,000,000 on deposit for construction of a Water Treatment Facility for direct deliveries of SP water.
The District is also in the process of implementing a Replenishment Assessment District in the developing areas including Noble Creek Vistas for the purpose of paying for the importation (delivery) of supplemental water supply annually based on the demand as the new units come on line. This replenishment fund will be used to further assist the Agency in paying for overdraft offset as required by 101-15.5.
Beyond the Replenishment Assessment, the District will be implementing a new addition to its current Facility Fee for the developing areas for the purpose of buying additional imported water (rights) supply beyond the Agency's current 17,300 acre-foot entitlement because the District expects all of the existing entitlement to be used to offset current and future overdraft throughout the Agency service area. The intent for this new water purchase fee is to pay for the water rights necessary to cover the 20% shown in Table 2-2 above as "SPW Via Pass Agency".
The fee, which will be in place within the next 90 days from the date of this report, will provide the District with revenue to purchase, through the Agency, new entitlement beyond the current SWP entitlement. For example, there is currently 4,000 acre-feet of existing entitlement available for sale by one of the SWP contractors. Neither the City nor the District have available funds to purchase the water rights currently valued at $2,000 per acre foot. With the new fee added to the existing Facility Fee, the District in the future as demands grow will have the funds available to purchase additional water supply to augment the 80% local supply. In other words the new fee will allow the District to develop the revenue source to purchase and develop 100% of the water needed for new development without relying on existing SPW entitlements.
In 2001 the San Timeteo Watershed Management Authority (STWMA) was formed for the purpose of developing a watershed management plan for an area of over 120 square miles of the upper San Timeteo Creek drainage area. The Joint Powers Authority members include the City of Beaumont, Beaumont Cherry Valley Water District, South Mesa Water Company and Yucaipa Valley Water District. STWMA has completed its Phase 1 report toward development of a watershed management plan that includes all of the service area of the four member Agencies along with their respective water development areas. One of the most important issues facing STWMA was to implement management and control of the Beaumont Basin, which is the largest groundwater basin in the watershed and is relied upon by all members of STWMA as well as others for a majority of the watershed's water supply. To resolve the issues related to the Beaumont Basin including current and future overdraft, STWMA filed a legal action for adjudication of the water basin naming all extractors from the Beaumont Basin including the STWMA member agencies. Following intense negotiations for approximately one year, the extractors have developed a Stipulated Judgment that when filed will complete the adjudication of the Beaumont Basin and form a Water Master to manage the basins water supply.
Additional water supplies can be made available through a conjunctive use program. The USGS has indicated in previous reports that the Beaumont Basin currently has between 200 and 400,000 acre-feet of vacant storage space that can be used to store water for later use. With the 9of14
POS_NobleCk V isms. DOC
adjudication and the Water Master in place the management of the Beaumont Basin will include conjunctive use. This program involves the lease of vacant water storage space in the basin for use by a conjunctive use partner. A conjunctive use partner can be defined as an agency or entity from outside the area that pays to store supplemental water for later use. The Stipulated Judgment provides that there will be a "minimum of 200,000 acre-feet" of storage space for conjunctive use. Development of a conjunctive use program in the Beaumont Basin will benefit all "appropriators" using the basin as it will make available additional funds to complete local water resource projects purchase additional supplemental supplies.
In summary, Figure 5-1 of the UWMP shows water supply reliability and the water demand comparison by growth.
Figure 5-1
Supply Reliability and Demand Comparison By Population Growth 30 , acre-feet (thousands)
-+ N N
O c
i 1V
m
R
5 -r
0 1995
2000
2005 2010 2015 2020
Year
2025
2030
--o— Supply —6— Demand, Population Based
With the continued exploration of the deep aquifers discussed in Exhibit No. 1, 'the implementation of projects discussed in this report and discussed in detail in Exhibit No. 4, the implementation of the Replenishment Assessment District, the development of a new fee for 10 of 14
POS_NobleCkVistaz. DOC
purchase of additional SPW entitlement, the soon to be filed Beaumont Basin adjudication, the creation of a Water Master to manage the basin and the development of a conjunctive use program, the District does have the sufficient water supply to serve this project with potable water and recycled water.
Water Demand Analysis
The District currently serves approximately 147 agriculture users, 267 commercial users, 7 industrial users, and 6,079 domestic residential and irrigation users. The following table shows the approximate amount of water used by each user classification in 2002.
User Category
Water Demand, 2002
(ac-ft/yr)
Agriculture
277
Commercial
640
Industrial
222
Residential & Irrigation
5,386
Other
(Construction, Fire, Maintenance, System Losses, etc.)
1,500
The yearly average domestic water demand is based on a water demand factor of 0.38 gpm per EDU (Equivalent Dwelling Unit, residential units). The District's UWMP discusses the water demand requirements for the Project. The yearly average demand for the proposed Project is estimated to be 367 gpm or about 592 ac-ft/yr. The Riverside County Fire Department will stipulate the required fire flow requirements for the Project.
The District does have the sufficient water supply to serve this project with potable water.
The table below compares current and projected water supply and demand based on the forecast increase of known developments requesting service and water supplies discussed above.
The individual components for the water supply and demand totals are discussed in the UWMP. 11 of 14
POS tiobteCkVistas.D0C
Projected Supply and Demand Comparison By Known Developments Requesting Service
2000
2005
2010
2015
2020
2025
Supply totals
6,308
15,380
21,850
24,500
25,160
25,820
Demand totals
6,308
9,800
-
14,100
17,900
19,300
20,400 i
Supply Surplus
(0)
5,580
7,750
5,860
5,420
__6,600
Units of Measure: Acre-feet/Year
Source: BCVWD 2000 Urban Water Management Plan Update
The following comparisons for the normal water year, single dry year, and multiple dry years are based on the forecasted supply versus demandbased upon planned development. The growth for the service area is an assessment based on the forecast planned and approved developments provided by the City of Beaumont and adjusted based on knowledge of the development specific plans and tract maps.
The supply reliability and demand comparison for the dry -year assessment is shown in the table below and includes demands and supplies during a single dry year (using 2010) and multiple dry water years using 2001, 2002 and 2003 as a basis. The years 2001 through 2003 were used as a basis because demand is anticipated to be met only by groundwater sources and would be the most critical three year period. Beyond 2003 additional water sources, such as recycled water, becomes available.
Supply Reliability and Demand Comparison
Average /
Normal
Water
Year
Single Dry
Water
Year
Multiple Dry Water Years
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Basis Years =>
2010
2010
2001
2002
2003
Supply totals
21,850
11,450
6,450
_ 6,450
6,450
Demand totals
14,100
15,091
7,640
7,810
8,240
Surplus Supply
7,750
(3,641)
(1,190)
(1,360)
(1,790)
Units of Measure: Acre-feet/Year
Source: BCVWD 2000 Urban Water Management Plan Update
The analysis predicts a water supply deficit for a dry year in 2010 of 3,641 acre-feet. This deficit can temporarily be over come by extracting additional groundwater from the Beaumont Basin for short periods of time along with implementation of some of the water shortage 12of14
PO S _N obleCk V istas. D OC
contingency measures as discussed in the UWMP. The additional water extracted from the Beaumont Basin would be replenished during wet years. Recycled water sources were assumed to not be available until after 2003 for this analysis. At such time recycled water is available, this source, during low demand periods such as during winter months, can be percolated to increase the amount of groundwater stored in the basin.
The years 2001 through 2003 were evaluated for the multiple dry years supply reliability because demand will likely be met only by groundwater sources during this period. Other sources would not be available until several years later. The supply calculations for each year of the multiple year comparison show that available groundwater resources do not adequately meet the increased water demand posed by a theoretical drought or extended dry period conditions.
Again, as indicated above, the water supply for the three successive years would be available from the perennial groundwater yield. When there is a need for additional water supply, the District has historically and plans to continue to draw on accumulated storage in the Beaumont Basin during critical supply years with plans to recharge the groundwater during wet years and. with the percolation of recycled water.
It should be noted that the additional supplies necessary to meet future demands in dry years beyond 2010 will be obtained by further developing recycled water resources, and implementing the District's water resource projects as discussed above.
Fees
Fees such as facility fees are collected at the time a request for water service is made by the applicant for each proposed tract and a Water Main Extension and Facilities Construction Agreement with the District is executed. The fees are collected to secure funding for the purpose of constructing backbone master planned facilities. A component of the facility fees includes a new water source fee to construct or obtain additional water required as a result of the new development. Facility fees are based on domestic water usage per EDUs. The proposed Project is equivalent to 965 EDUs.
Other fees include connection and meter fees, which are paid by the developer at time of construction for each tract.
The present standard District charges are shown below. The charges are subject to change. All facility fees and other charges will be at the rate at the time of execution of the Water Main Extension and Facilities Construction Agreement.
Facilities Fee
$6,329 per EDU + Adjustment for fire flows
1 EDU = 0.38gpm (approx. 550 gpd)
13of14
POS _NobleCk V istas. DOC
District Charges
Connection Charge ( 8") $26.00/LF (Front Footage)
Water Meter (1") Charge and Installation $329.00/meter
Other fees applicable to domestic retail service are:
Water Rates
$0.77 per CCF (hundred cubic feet)
Monthly Service Charge for 1" meter $14.00
Other fees applicable to domestic retail service are:
Additional Charges
Power 1% to 3%
of total monthly water consumption charges.
Financing
The water improvements required for annexation of the proposed Project will be paid by the developer and through collection of facility fees and/or water rate assessments.
By:
C. J. Butcher, General Manager
Beaumont Cherry Valley Water District
Date:
14 of 14
POS NobleC?Vistas.DOC
MOUNTAIN
CHERRY VALLEY AVE.
BROOKSIDE AVENUE 16"
LEGEND
— -> — DEVELOPMENT BOUNDARY
X" EXISTING WATER LINES
fai • S X" FUTURE WATER LINES
4 NORTH
NOT TO SCALE
NOBLE CREEK VISTAS
2850 PRESSURE ZONE
EXHIBIT A-1
CHERRY VALLEY AVE.
BROOKSIDE AVENUE
16"
be
I
19%
." 0
'
•'r
9" 4,
12850
I■■ ZONE
�p ■
I
16" COUGAR WAY
i
14TH STREET 9 I
LEGEND
— — — — DEVELOPMENT BOUNDARY
+� • X" RECYCLED WATER LINES
X" EXISTING RECYCLED
WATER LINES
NORTH
NOT TO SCALE
NOBLE CREEK VISTAS
RECYCLE WATER PLAN
EXHIBIT A-2
Source: modified from USGS 1:24 000 topographic maps of Beaumont, Forest Falls, Yucaipa, and El Casco, CA NORTH
0 8000
Aaproximate Scale in Feet
Exhibit B
District Boundary and Sphere of Influence
Beaumont Cherry Valley Water District
Beaumont, California
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
LAW OFFICES OF ROBERT C. GOODMAN
ROBERT C. GOODMAN (State Bar No. 111554)
ANN M. BLESSING (State Bar No. 172573)
177 Post Street, Suite 750
San Francisco, CA 94108
Telephone: (415) 777-2210
Facsimile: (415) 777-2215
Attorneys for Petitioners Cherry Valley
Pass Acres and Neighbors and Cherry Valley
Environmental Planning Group
SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
Riverside Branch
CHERRY VALLEY PASS ACRES AND )
NEIGHBORS, a California non-profit ) No. RIC 427282
corporation; and CHERRY VALLEY )
ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING GROUP, a ) Case Filed Under the Environmental Quality California non-profit corporation, ) Act
Petitioners, ) NOTICE OF ENTRY OF SETTLEMENT
) AGREEMENT AND FINAL STIPULATED
v. ) JUDGMENT
CITY OF BEAUMONT, a municipal )
corporation; )
)
Respondent. )
)
)
TAHITI GROUP; JACK D. VANDER )
WOUDE; LEONARD B. OLINGER; )
LEONARD B. OLINGER TRUST; JOSEPH )
DIAMOND; BEATRICE DIAMOND; NOBLE)
CREEK MEADOWS; DIANE C. ONEY as )
trustee of the D. DONALD LONIE, JR. )
FAMILY TRUST; R. F. BIANCHI TRUST;
ALLIED GROUP, INC.; and ROES 100 )
through 200, inclusive, )
Real Parties in Interest )
)
NOTICE OF ENTRY OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND FINAL STIPULATED JUDGMENT CASE NO. RIC 427282
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on May 31, 2006, the Court approved and entered the attached Settlement Agreement and Final Stipulated Judgment.
Dated: June 2006
LAW OFFICES OF ROBERT C. GOODMAN
By:
-2-
R3ERT C. GOODMAN
Attorneys for Petitioners
Cherry Valley Pass Acres and Neighbors
and Cherry Valley Environmental
Planning Group
NOTICE OF ENTRY OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND FINAL STIPULATED JUDGMENT CASE NO. RIC 427282
1 2
3 4
5 LAW OFFICES OF ROBERT C. GOODMAN
ROBERT C. GOODMAN (State Bar No. 111554)
ANN M. BLESSING (State Bar No. 172573)
177 Post Street, Suite 750
San Francisco, CA 94108
Telephone: (415) ?77_22I0
Facsimile: (415) 777-2215
6 Attorneys for Petitioners Cherry Valley
Pass Acres and Neighbors and Cherry Valley
7 Environment Planning Group
B
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
R1VEFi51DE COtJN1X)
MAY 3 1 ZOOS
L Martia
Doputyr
SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STAB OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
Riverside Branch
CHERRY VALLEY PASS ACRES AND BY FA
NEIGHBORS, a California non-profit
corporatio • and p ) No. RIC 427282
� CHERRY VALLEY
EN
VIRONMENTAL -AcoLANNING GROUP, a ) Case Filed Under the Environmental Quali �'0 n, � Act tY
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT, AND
FINAL STIPULATED JUDGMENT
) [CaL Pub. Res. Code §§.21167.4(c), 21168.5;
) Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 1085]
)
) Trial Date: April 7, 2006
)
Petitioners,
v.
CITY OF BEA-UNION-I; a municipal
corporation;
Respondent,
21 TAHITI GROUP; JACK D. VANDER )
WOUDE; LEONARD 13.OLINGER;
22 LEONARD 13.OLINGE�R TRUST; JOSEPH)
DIAMOND; BEATRICE DIAMOND;
23 NOBLE IvIEADOWS; DIANE C. ONEY as )
24 ' tee of the D. DONALD LON1E, )
�R. FAMILY TRUST R. F. BIANCHI )
25 TRUST; ALLIED GROUP, INC.; and ROES )
100 through 200, inclusive, )
261 )
27 I Real Parties in interest )
28 -I-
SETTLEMENT AGRai4iENT AND FINAL STIPULATED JUDGMENT
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 This Settlement Agreement and Final Stipulated Judgment is entered into by and between Petitioners CHERRY VALLEY PASS ACRES AND NEIGHBORS and CHERRY VALLEY ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING GROUP (collectively "Petitioners") on the one hand, and on the other hand Respondent CITY OF BEAUMONT ("City") and Real Parties in Interest NOBEL CREEK MEADOWS, LLC, erroneously sued herein as NOBLE CREEK MEADOWS, TAHITI GROUP and JACK D. VANDER WOUDE; OLINGER RIVERSIDE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, erroneously sued herein as LEONARD B. OLINGER and LEONARD B.
OLINGER TRUST; DIAMOND RIVERSIDE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, erroneously sued herein as JOSEPH DIAMOND and BEATRICE DIAMOND; and FIESTA DEVELOPMENT, as successor in interest to Diane C. Oney as Trustee of the D. Donald Lonie Jr. Family Trust and BEK Consulting Engineers, Inc., (collectively "Real Parties in Interest"). Petitioners, City, and Real Parties in Interest are referred to collectively as "the Parties." The settlement and judgment relate to the petition Petitioners filed under the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") on March 17, 2005 ("the Action"), concerning a proposed 965 unit residential development in Beaumont, California, which the developers currently call "Noble Creek Vistas" ("the Project").
RECITALS
A. Petitioners are California non profit corporations located in Cherry Valley California.
B. City is the lead agency for the Project that is the subject of the petition.
C. OLINGER RIVERSIDE LIM1 mD PARTNERHHIP, DIAMOND RIVERSIDE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, NOBEL CREEK MEADOWS, LLC., and FIESTA DEVELOPMENT, as successor in interest to Diane C. Oney as Trustee of the D. Donald Lonie Jr. Family Trust and BEK Consulting Engineers, Inc., own the property which comprises the Project which is the subject of this action, as identified more specifically on Exhibit A, attached hereto.
D. TAHITI GROUP, JACK D. VANDER WOUDE are proponents of the Project.
E. On or about February 15, 2005 the Beaumont City Council certified the Noble 28 Creek Vistas Specific Plan EIR, approved certain Conditions of Approval, adopted a Statement of 584270.1 -
2 SE 1'1 _ LEMENT AGREEMENT AND FINAL STIPULATED JUDGMENT
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
Overriding Considerations, and filed a Notice of Determination with the Riverside County Recorder in connection with the Project. On March 17, 2005, Petitioners filed this Action challenging City's certification of the EIR and approval of the Project.
F. Each of the Parties believes that it is in their best interest and in the public interest to settle this case without further litigation.
AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing recitals and the mutual promises and agreements contained herein, and for other good and valuable consideration the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, it is agreed as follows:
1. Jurisdiction. This Court has jurisdiction of the subject matter of the Action and each of the Parties hereto.
2. Modifications. This Agreement, upon being executed by all the parties and approved by the Court, shall constitute binding and enforceable modifications of the Conditions of Approval issued by the City on February 15, 2005, for the Project.
City and Real Parties in Interest commit to the following modifications to the Conditions of Approval for the Project:
A. The Project will contain no more than 648 residential units, each of which shall be a detached single family home.
B. At least 50% of all homes backing up on Brookside Avenue and 50% of all homes backing up on Beaumont Avenue will be single story homes.
C. At least 25% of all lots backing up on Brookside Avenue and at least 25% of all lots backing up on Beaumont Avenue will be minimum 15,000 square feet in size.
The remainder of lots backing up on those two streets will be a minimum 10,000 square feet in size.
D. All homes will be constructed and certified under the California Green Builder program as described on the California Green Builder website, www.cagreenbuilder.org ., as of March 10, 2006. Real Parties shall provide Petitioners with a copy of all communications with the California Green Builder 584274.1
-3-
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND FINAL STIPULATED JUDGMENT
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
584270.1
program regarding the Project within five (5) days of sending or receipt, including without limitation the completed California Green Builder Application form and the California Green Builder Project Certificate. City shall not issue any certificates of occupancy for the Project until the Project has received the California Green Builder Project Certificate.
E. There will be a 40 foot landscape buffer from the western edge of the Beaumont Avenue right of way to the Project boundary, with a berm along the project wall, and a meandering sidewalk within the landscape buffer, as reflected in the diagram attached as Exhibit C.
F. There will be a permeable surface in a 25 foot radius around the deodar cedar trees (except in those areas on the street side of the trees in which there is a distance of less than 25 feet to the street).
G The 11 foot right of way along the west side of Beaumont Avenue shall be designated a landscape right of way.
H. There will be a landscape buffer along the southern edge of Brookside Avenue right of way to the Project boundary. The width of the buffer will be 38 feet.
There will also be a landscape buffer along the southern edge of Noble Creek Parkway. The width of this buffer will range from 18 to 38 feet to accommodate Noble Creek as it crosses Brookside Avenue, as reflected in the diagram attached as Exhibit D.
The landscape buffers and landscape right of way described above will utilize drought resistant plants consistent with City landscape standards. The landscape buffers, landscape right of way and deodar cedars shall be maintained by the Community Facilities District ("CFD") that is being established in accordance with the Project Conditions of Approval. Should the CFD be dissolved for any reason, the Project Conditions of Approval will require that there be a Homeowners Association (consisting of all homeowners within the Project) that will become activated upon the dissolution of the CFD and which will have -4-
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND FINAL STIPULATED JUDGMENT
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
responsibility for the landscape and tree maintenance described in this Paragraph 2, as well as all other obligations of the CFD, in perpetuity.
J Each of the modifications identified in this Paragraph 2 shall be reflected in the modified Project Conditions, attached hereto as Exhibit B, and summarized in a notification of this settlement in the form attached as Exhibit E, which shall be recorded against the properties that comprise the Project such that they will run with the land and be binding on future owners.
K. Within 15 days of the effective date of this Agreement, City will take action to modify the Project Conditions of Approval and Project Specific Plan to reflect the modifications set forth in this section.
3. Additional Commitments of the City and Real Parties in Interest. City and Real Parties in Interest agree to do the following:
A. City and the Real Parties in Interest will provide Petitioners with advance notice of all significant events and/or actions proposed to be taken by the City relating to the Project, including without limitation, submission of subdivision maps, improvement plans, and any other submissions relating to the Project requiring City review and/or approval.
B. Real Parties in Interest will provide access to and dedicate approximately 15 acres of land to the City for use by the Beaumont Cherry Valley Water District ("Water District") to construct recharge facilities along the Noble Creek. As a condition of such dedication, City will require that such land not be fenced and that such land will be made available for recreational purposes. The Water District will construct and maintain the recharge facilities in the manner similar to those on its property located along the east side of Beaumont Avenue between Brookside Avenue and Cherry Valley Boulevard. If the Water District does not accept the gift of land referred to in this paragraph, the land will be given to the Beaumont Cherry Valley Recreation and Parks District to be used as parkland, to be maintained by the CFD. 584270.1
-5-
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND FINAL STIPULATED JUDGMENT
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
584270.1
C. Real Parties will comply with the Conditions of Approval and all City Code requirements in connection with construction of parks and open space on the Project. The specific location and size of the parks will be finalized upon the preparation of the tract maps for individual tracts comprising the Project.
D. The City shall not issue any certificates of occupancy for the Project until the improvements contemplated by the Specific Plan to the following streets and intersections have been completed: the intersections of Beaumont Avenue and Oak Valley Parkway, Beaumont Avenue and Cougar Way, Beaumont Avenue and Brookside Avenue and Beaumont Avenue and Cherry Valley Boulevard.
Specifically, the improvements will result in compliance with the level of service required in the mitigation measures approved by the City for the Project E. Real Parties in Interest and City agree to maintain the deodar cedar trees along the west side of Beaumont Avenue through the CFD referenced in paragraph 21, above, and to replace trees that die with deodar cedar trees. The City will maintain the deodar cedar trees along the east side of Beaumont Avenue upon the completion of the annexation proceedings, whereby the area is annexed into the City, and replace trees that die with deodar cedar trees.
F. Real Parties in Interest agree to retain a certified arborist to study the condition of the deodar cedar trees along Beaumont Avenue from Oak Valley Parkway to Cherry Valley Boulevard, and recommend ways to improve their condition and prolong the longevity of the trees. Petitioners will participate in the study of the deodar cedar trees through the selection of the arborist who will perform the study.
If the Real Parties in Interest and Petitioners cannot agree on an arborist, each will select an arborist, and the two selected arborists will in turn select the arborist who will perform the study. Petitioners shall have an opportunity to review and comment on a draft of the arborist's study and recommendations and provide comments regarding same. Petitioners shall have no approval authority over the -6-
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND FINAL STIPULATED JUDGMENT
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
recommendations of the arborist. The selection of the arborist and the study are to commence within 60 days of the execution of the settlement agreement.
4. Monetary Payments and Dismissal.
A. Within 15 days of the effective date of this Agreement Real Parties in Interest shall pay to Petitioners and its attorneys, Law Offices of Robert C. Goodman, the sum of $225,000 as compensation for Petitioners' attorneys fees, costs, expenses and other efforts in prosecuting the Action.
B. The obligation of the Real Parties M Interest to make the monetary payment required by this Paragraph 4 are joint and several.
C. Petitioners shall dismiss this action within 10 days of the receipt of the settlement funds.
5. Effective Date. This Agreement shall become effective on the date it is filed with the Riverside County Superior Court.
6. Commitments of the Petitioners. As long as City and the Real Parties in Interest are in compliance with this Agreement and the modified Project Conditions of Approval and Project Specific Plan they will not: (a) oppose the Project, the annexation proceedings or the tentative tract maps submitted by the individual property owners; and (b) will not institute any further actions or challenges to the Project either under their own names or under the name of any other organization or through their members.
7. No Admission, Denial of Liability. This Agreement and the payments and other terms provided for herein are made, executed, given and accepted as part of a compromise and settlement of disputed claims. No provision(s) of this Agreement, nor any acceptance of the benefits thereof, by or on behalf of any of the Parties hereto shall be construed or deemed to be evidence of an admission of fact, matter, thing or liability of any kind to any other Party.
8. Notice. All notices concerning this agreement shall be in writing, shall be deemed given when received, and shall be delivered by mail, facsimile or overnight delivery to:
Petitioners:
Patsy Reeley
584274.1
-T-
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND FINAL STIPULATED JUDGMENT
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
Cherry Valley Acres & Neighbo
P.O. Box 3257
Beaumont, California 92223
Walt Beckman
Cherry Valley Environmental Planning Group
Cherry Valley, CA 92223
With a copy to:
Robert C. Goodman
177 Post Street, Suite 750
San Francisco, CA 94108
City:
City of Beaumont
c/o Ernest Egger
550 East 6th Street
Beaumont, CA 92223
With a copy to:
Joseph Aklufi
Aklufi & Wysocki
3403 Tenth Street
Suite 610
Riverside, CA 92501
Real Parties in Interest:
Nobel Creek Meadows, LLC
c/o Jack D. Vander Woude
P.O. Box 5441
San Bernardino, CA 92412
With a copy to:
Leonard Polyakov
Newmeyer & Dillion, LLC
895 Dove Street, 5th Floor
Newport Beach, CA 92660
Vien Tran
Fiesta Development
470 E. Harrison Street
Corona, CA 92879-1314
Olinger Riverside Limited Partnership
c/o Dr. Leonard Olinger
462 N. Linden Drive
Beverly Hills, CA 90212
584270.1
_8_
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND FINAL STIPULATED JUDGMENT
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
With a copy to:
Roger H. Howard
Christensen, Miller, et al.
10250 Constellation Blvd., 19th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90067
Diamond Riverside Limited Partnership
c/o Beatrice Diamond
233 S. Spaulding Drive
Beverly Hills CA 90212
With a copy to:
Edward F. Quigley
Cox, Castle & Nicholson, LLP
2049 Century Park East, 28th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90067-3284
9. Entire Agreement. This Agreement is the entire agreement between the Parties with respect to resolution of the subject matter hereof and supersedes any and all prior or contemporaneous oral and written agreements and discussions between or among any of them.
The Parties hereto acknowledge and agree that there are no conditions, covenants, agreements or understandings between or among any of them except as set forth in this Agreement and the exhibits hereto. This Agreement may be amended, and the requirements set forth herein modified, only by a further signed writing of all Parties.
10. Successors. This Agreement is binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of each of the Parties hereto and (as appropriate) their respective parent companies, subsidiaries, affiliates, predecessors, successors, divisions, shareholders, directors, officers, employees, attorneys, agents, representatives, heirs and assigns.
11. Controlling Law. This Agreement is to be executed and delivered within the State of California, and its validity, construction and performance, as well as the rights and obligations of the parties hereunder, shall be governed, construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of California, without regard to principles of choice of law.
12. Fair Interpretation. This Agreement is the product of negotiations between the Parties and their respective attorneys, and shall be given fair interpretation. Each of the Parties hereto has cooperated and participated in the drafting and preparation of this Agreement. Accordingly, the 584270.1
-9-
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND FINAL STIPULATED JUDGMENT
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 11
12 13
14 15
16 17
18 19
20 21
22 23
24 25
26 27
28 parties hereby acknowledge and agree that this Agreement shall not be construed or interpreted in favor of or against any party by virtue of the identity of its preparer.
13. Mutual Representations and Covenants. Each of the Parties to this Agreement represents, warrants and agrees as follows:
A. Each Party has received independent legal advice from its attorney with respect to the advisability of making the settlement provided for herein and the advisability of executing this Agreement.
B. Each Party hereto represents and warrants that there has been no assignment, sale or transfer, by operation of the law or otherwise, of any claim, right, cause of action, demand, obligation, liability or interest released by any of them as provided herein.
14. Authority to Enter Into Agreement. Each Party executing this Agreement represents and warrants that it has the authority to bind the respective party and needs no further authority to bind the respective Parties to the rights, duties and obligations set forth herein.
15. Counterparts. Each Party (i) hereby agrees that a facsimile or other electronic copy (such as a ".pdf'/"Adobe Acrobat" copy) of the signature of the person executing this Agreement on behalf of such Party may be used for any and all purposes, with the same force and effect as an original of such signature, (ii) intends to be bound by the facsimile or other electronic copy of such signature, (iii) is aware that the other Party will rely on the facsimile or other electronic copy of such signature, and (iv) hereby acknowledges such reliance and waives any defenses to the enforcement of this Agreement based on a facsimile or other electronic copy of such signature.
16. Continuing Jurisdiction. By signing this Settlement Agreement and Final Stipulated Judgment, the parties hereby move the court pursuant to Section 664.6 of the Code of Civil Procedure to enter judgment pursuant to the terms of this settlement. This Judgment shall go into effect immediately upon entry hereof. Entry is authorized immediately upon filing. The parties hereby request and acknowledge that the Superior Court will retain jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to Section 664.6 of the Code of Civil Procedure to enforce the terms of the Agreement until performance in full of its terms.
584270.1
- 10 -
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND FINAL STIPULATED JUDGMENT
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
Dated: March , 2006
Dated: March , 2006
Cherry Valley Acres & Neighbors
By:
Patsy Reeky
Cherry Valley Environmental Planning Group
By:
Walt Beckman
Dated: March , 2006 City of Beaumont
By:
Dated: March , 2006 Nobel Creek Meadows, LLC
By:
Jack Vander Woude
Dated: March , 2006 Fiesta Development
By:
Dated: March , 2006 Olinger Riverside Limited Partnership By:
Leonard B. Olinger
Dated: March , 2006 Diamond Riverside Limited Partnership 584270.1
By:
Beatrice Diamond
- 11 -
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND FINAL STIPULATED JUDGMENT
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
2006
d: 1tif ,5 , 2006
Dated: March , 2006
Dated: March _ , 2006
Dated: March , 2006
Dated: March , 2006
Dated: March , 2006
514270.1
Cherry Valley Acres & Neighbors
Cherry Valley Environmental Planning Group
BY: fl
Walt &x
City of Beaumont
By:
Nobel Creek Meadows, LLC
By:
Jack Vander Woude
Fiesta Development
By:
Olinger Riverside Limited Partnership
By:
Leonard B. Olinger
Diamond Riverside Limited Partnership
By:
Beatrice Diamond
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND FINAL STIPULATED JUDGMENT
05/17/2006 17:41 FAX
NEWMEYER PILLION LLP 013
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
1?
18 19
20 21
22 23
24 25
26 27
28 gifi:(ssal4 NO11111110 r6I97,39606:01S3 x660L$INQ agPedi Wd tii303 900VII S LY au , ZIZ 39tid Darted: March . 2046
baked: March . 2006
M0.y
Dated:.Mateh 15.2006
Dated March .2006
Dated: Marsh , 2006
Dated: March , 2006
Did:
MATMA
Cherry Valley Acres & Neighbo
By:
Patsy Rceley
harry V,dky Environmental Planning Group
By:
Walt Backman
City of Beaumont
Nobel Creek Meadows, LLC
ck Vander Woude
©linger Riverside Limited Partnership
By;
Leonard B. ©linger
2006 Diamond Riverside Limited Partnership
By:
Beatrice Diamond
Z0 3 id
t1 EMENT AGREEMENT AND FINAL STIPULATED JODGMEkT
I>1rJOSAP ova in -Div 6196689606. EZ:9T 900Z(LI/S0
O5/17/2006 17:41 FAX
NEWMEYER DILLION LLP
Z014
1 2
3 Dated: March , 2006 Cherry Valley Acres & Neighbors
may:_
4 ! Patsy Reeley
5 6
Dated: March . 2006 Cherry Valley Environmental Planning Group 7 By:
8 9
10 11
12 13
14 15
16 17
18 19
20 21
22 23
24 25
26 27
28 Dated: March , 2006
Dated: $r . , 2006
Dated: March 2006
Dated: March , 2006
Walt Beckman
City of Beaumont
Fiesta Development
By;
Olinger Riverside Limited Partnership
By:
Leonard B. Olinger
Dated: March . 2006 Diamond Riverside Limited Partnership 554270,1
By: _
Beatrice Diamond
-1)-
SL1 1LEMENT AGREEMENT AND FINAL STIPULA'fEU JUDGMENT
05/17/2006 17:41 FAX
NEWMEYER DILLION LLP [1015
2 4
5 6
7 9
10 11
12 13
14 15
16 17
18 19
20 21
22 23
24 25
26 27
28 Dated: March , 2006
Dated: March . 2006
Dated: March . 2006
Dated: March 2006
Dated: March , 2006
Dated: March , 2006
Cherry Valley Acres & Neighbors
By:
Patsy Reeley
Cherry Valley Environmental Planning Group
By:
Walt Beckman
City of }3eaumont
By
Nobel Creek Meadows, LLC
By:
Jack Vander Woude
to Development
d: March , 2006 Olinger Riverside Limited Partnership
By:,
Leonard B, Olinger
Diamond Riverside Limited Partnership
13y:
Beatrice Diamond
AGREEMENT AND FINAL STIPULATED JUDGMENT
05/17/2006 17:42 FAX
SJJf VJr .a.-vgvv, S $ vvv •��r
WMEYER PILLION LLP
2016
4 S
6 7
9 10
12 13
14 15
16 17
15 19
20 21
22 Dated: March 2006 Cry Wiley Acres & Neighbors
23 24
25 26
27 2S
March , 2006
BY_ _
Pauy Reeley
Cherry Valk, Egviroemmtal Planning Group
Wait Beckmm
tied: Mil, , 2006 - City of Bceumont
Deed: March !� 2006
2006
Nobel Crock 1<4eadoWs, LLC
]ernk'Vandet Woo&
Fiesta Development
13y:
Olinger Riverside L{mltod Fatnership
Disrrond Riverside Limited Partnership
- 11 -
- 11 -
sr
sETruatiENT AGREEM:DZT AND FINAL S1VULATED JUDGMENT
05/17/2006 17:42 FAX NEWMEYER DILLION LLP
Z017
017
05-15-09 02:43p From -COX, CASTLE, & MICHOLS011
1 2 Dated: March , 2006
3 4
5 Dated; March 2006
6 7
8 310 -2T7 -T909 T-es5 P.003/004 F-189
Cherry Valley Acres & Neighbors
Patsy Reelery
Cherry Valley Environmental. Planning Group
By:
Walt Beckman
9 Dated: March 2006
_..., City of Bcatuncmt
10 11 By:
12 13
14 i By.
15 16
17 18
19 Dated: March , 2006 Nobel Creek Meadows, LLC
Jack Vander Woude
Dated; March , 2006 Fiesta Development
20 Dated: March, 2006 Olinger Riverside Limited Partnership 21 22 By:
23 Leonard B. Olinger
24 J Dated! March , 2006 Diamond Riverside Limited Partnership 25 26 1 By:
27 28
Beatrice Diamond
PAGE 311' RCYD AT 511512046 2:43:11 PM (Fault DayigtIt Timej' SVR:SFAX6219 DNIS:7099CSV:316 277 7889' DURATION (lmisp1.16
1 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 11
12 13
14 15
16 17
18 19
20 2I
22 23
24 25
26 27
28 ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED. This Court shall retain jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to Section 664.6 of the Code of Civil Procedure to supervise, interpret, and enforce, the terms of this Final Stipulated Judgment.
Dated:
-12-
STEPHEN Q- CUNNtSQN
Hon. Stephen Cunnison
JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND FINAL STIPULATED JUDGMENT
Exhibit A
The Project that is the subject matter of this Agreement is known as the Noble Creek Vistas Specific Plan as approved by the City Council of the City of Beaumont on February 15, 2005 and consisting of the following County of Riverside Assessor's parcels:
406-290-028 Bianchi Properties, Ltd.
406-290-034 Mike and Donna Bell
406-290-035 Pure Rock Community Church
406-070-024 Nobel Creek Meadows, LLC
406-070-038 Diamond Riverside Limited Partnership and Olinger Riverside Limited Partnership
406-070-046 Diamond Riverside Limited Partnership and Olinger Riverside Limited Partnership
406-080-011 Fiesta Development
406-080-032 Fiesta Development
Exhibit B
[Revised] CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
NOBLE CREEK VISTAS
SPECIFIC PLAN
REVISED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (3/21/06)
GENERAL CONDITIONS
The following conditions of approval are for the NOBLE CREEK VISTAS SPECIFIC PLAN and consist of Conditions 1 through 36 inclusive.
The Noble Creek Vistas Specific Plan shall consist of the following, components as approved through City of Beaumont City Council Resolution No. 2005- a. Approved Noble Creek Vistas Specific Plan Text (fmal document incorporating all changes made through public hearing process).
b. Exhibits "A" and "13," Final Environmental Impact Report, Findings of Fact and Mitigation Monitoring Program.
c. Exhibit "C": Specific Plan Conditions of Approval.
d. These Revised Conditions of Approval.
All mitigation measures as contained in the Final EIR shall be conditions of approval for the project. Subsequent to the completion of the public hearing process, the Applicant shall finalize the Specific Plan to incorporate all changes and modifications, and provide the Director with 25 bound and one reproducible copies of the Specific Plan text and exhibits, and the Final Environmental Impact Report.
3. If any of the following conditions of approval differ from the specific plan text or exhibits, the conditions enumerated herein shall take precedence.
4. Mitigation measures for impacts to the Beaumont Unified School District and any other districts which may ultimately serve the project shall be identified prior to the recordation of implementing tentative subdivision maps in accordance with the State laws and City Council policies in effect at the time of application submittal.
5. The development standards contained in the approved Specific Plan shall become the prevailing land use regulations for the areas contained within the Noble Creek Vistas Specific Plan. These regulations will have full force of the Zoning Ordinance of the Beaumont Municipal Code through application of the SPA (Specific Plan Area) Zone.
Where conflicts exist between approved Specific Plan and the Beaumont Zoning Ordinance, the Specific Plan regulation shall prevail. Subject to the vesting effect of the Development Agreement, where conflicts existing between the Specific Plan and the provisions of the
NOBLE CREEK VISTAS SPECIFIC PLAN
Conditions of Approval
Municipal Code, other than the Zoning Ordinance, the provisions of the Municipal Code shall prevail.
6. Development applications for development portions of the Specific Plan area which incorporate common areas shall be accompanied by design plans for the common area. Such plans shall specify the location and extent of landscaping and irrigation systems.
Additionally, all circulation components (vehicular, pedestrian and/or equestrian) shall be indicated, and the approximate locations of structures or groups of structures shall be indicated.
7. A parcel map filed for the purposes of phasing or financing shall not be considered a development application for the purpose of these conditions. Tentative Tract Maps No.28988 and 29267, which have been held in abeyance due to litigation related to prior efforts to develop the subject site, shall be subject to a new approval date of February 15, 2005, subsequent to which the initial two-year approval duration shall ensue.
8. The Planning Director may require special studies or reports in connection with implementing development applications for each planning area, if and to the extent reasonably necessary for appropriate review of a development application or as required under applicable law. Such reports may include, where appropriate:
Study/Report
a. Preliminary Soils and Geotechnical Report
b. Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan
c. Streetscape, parkway and median landscape plan
d. Fencing and wall plan
e. Traffic and circulation assessment to document adequacy/function of proposed improvements
f. Fuel modification plan
g. Acoustical Study
h. Cultural Resource Assessment
9. Common areas identified in the Specific Plan (Le., parks, entry features, parkways, medians
NOBLE CREEK VISTAS SPECIFIC PLAN
Conditions of Approval
and open space features) shall be designed, developed, owned and maintained through the City's Community Facilities District (CFD), with all developers/landowners and subsequent occupants in the project responsible for a pro rata share of the cost of CFD formation, design and development of common facilities and parks, and for the long-term maintenance of such improvements. The project developers also will create a Noble Creek Vistas Homeowners Association (HOA) of which each homeowner in the Specific Plan shall belong. Should the CFD be dissolved for any reason the HOA will become activated and will have the same responsibilities as the CFD, including without limitation, the design, development, ownership and maintenance of all common areas identified in the Specific Plan.
10. Prior to issuance of a building permit for the construction of any use contemplated by this approval, any developer shall first obtain clearance from the Planning Department that all pertinent conditions of approval of the specific plan have been satisfied for the subject phase of development.
11. If and to the extent required by applicable law, an environmental assessment shall be conducted for each subsequent development applications including, but not limited to, parcel map, tract, change of zone, plot plan, use permit, variance or specific plan amendment. Said environmental assessment shall, to the greatest extent feasible under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), utilize the evaluation of impacts addressed in the EIR prepared for the Noble Creek Vistas Specific Plan. The Noble Creek Vistas Specific Plan EIR shall be used as a Program EIR in evaluating subsequent discretionary entitlement actions.
12. The Noble Creek Specific Plan shall remain unmodified (except for modifications requested by the Applicant and approved by the City) for 15 years. Should the entire project not be built out in that period of time, the City shall be entitled to adopt specific plan amendments for any portion of the project which has not been constructed within 15 years.
13. The Applicants (or their successors -in -interest, as the case may be) shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Beaumont, its agents, consultants, officers, and employees from any third -party claim, action or proceeding against the City of Beaumont or this agents, consultants, officers, or employees to attach, set aside, void or annul an approval of the City of Beaumont, its advisory agencies, appeal boards or legislative body concerning the Noble Creek Vistas Specific Plan. The City of Beaumont will promptly notify the Applicants or their successors of any such claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Beaumont and will cooperate fully in the defense.
14. The Applicants shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of Beaumont and its employees, agents, consultants, officers and contractors from any third -party claim, action or proceeding related to the environmental documentation pursuant to the California
NOBLE CREEK VISTAS SPECIFIC PLAN
Conditions of Approval
Environmental Quality Act associated with the Noble Creek Vistas Specific Plan.
15. In accordance with Section 711.4 of the California Fish and Game Code, the Applicants/subdividers are obligated to pay a filing fee to defray cost incurred by the Department of Fish and Game in managing and protecting fish and wildlife trust resources.
The Applicants/subdividers are also obligated to pay a documentary handling fee to defray costs incurred by the City of Beaumont in implementing the Department of Fish and Game filing fee program. These fees shall be paid to the County Clerk if the County ofRiverside at the time of filing a notice of determination pursuant to Section 21152 of the Public Resources Code. Applicants shall not be entitled to exercise their rights under the Specific Plan or the Development Agreement until such fees have been paid. The amount of the fees shall be in accordance with legally adopted fees at the time of the filing of the notice of determination.
LAND USE CONDITIONS
16. The Specific Plan may be developed up to a maximum yield of 648 dwelling units, each of which shall be a detached single family home. Densities for each Planning Area shown in Figure 1 of the supplement to the Specific Plan shall be determined through the appropriate development application, but not limited to, the following:
a. Adequate availability of services;
b. Adequate access and circulation;
c. Sensitivity to land forms;
d. Innovation in housing types, design, conservation, or opportunities; and e. Sensitivity to neighborhood design through appropriate lot and street layouts.
17. The following standards shall govern development of the specified components of the Specific Plan's land use plan:
a. The minimum lot size throughout the project shall be 6,000 square feet, and each Planning Area shall have an average lot size of at least 7,500 square feet. b. A minimum of 25 percent of the developable residential lots established in Planning Area 8 and a minimum of 25 percent of the developable residential lots established in Planning Area 11 shall be at least 7,200 square feet in size. c. A minimum of 25 percent of the developable residential lots established in Planning Area 7 shall be at least 7,200 square feet in size.
d. A minimum of 75 percent of the developable residential lots established in Planning Area 7 shall have rear setbacks with a minimum average depth of 20 feet. e. All residential lots which back up to Beaumont Avenue (Planning Areas 2 and 10) shall be at least 10,000 square feet in size. At least 25% of all lots backing up to
NOBLE CREEK VISTAS SPECIFIC PLAN
Conditions of Approval
Beaumont Avenues shall be minimum 15,000 square feet in size. f. A11 residential lots which back up to Brookside Avenue shall be at least 10,000 square feet in size. At least 25% of all lots backing up to Brookside Avenue shall be minimum 15,000 square feet in size.
g. At least 50% of all homes backing up to Beaumont Avenue and at least 50% of all homes backing up to Brookside Avenue shall be single story homes. h. All homes within the Specific Plan are to be constructed and certified under the California Green Builder program as described on the California Green Builder website, www.cagreenbuilder.org as of March 10, 2006. The City will not issue any certificates of occupancy for the homes within the Specific Plan until the California Green Builder certificates are obtained for those homes.i. A multi -purpose trail, subject to the design approval of the Planning Director, shall be provided along the entire Brookside Avenue frontage.
j. Fencing materials within the project shall be limited to materials such as masonry, stucco, tubular steel or vinyl, as approved by the Director of Planning. Wood fencing shall not be permitted within the project.
k. There will be a 40 foot landscape buffer from the western edge of the Beaumont Avenue right of way to the Project boundary, with a berm along the project wall, and a meandering sidewalk within the landscape buffer.
1 There will be a permeable surface in a 25 foot radius around the deodar cedar trees (except in those areas on the street side of the trees in which there is a distance of less than 25 feet to the street).
m. The 11 foot right of way along the west side of Beaumont Avenue shall be designated a landscape right of way.
n. There will be a 40 foot landscape buffer along the southern edge of Brookside Avenue right of way to the Project boundary. There will be a landscape buffer ranging from 18 to 38 feet along the southern edge of Noble Creek Parkway. o. The landscape buffers and landscape right of way described above will utilize drought resistant plants consistent with City landscape standards. The landscape buffers, landscape right of way and deodar cedars shall be maintained by the CFD as described in paragraph 9, above.
18. Lots created pursuant to this specific plan shall be in conformance with the development standards of the SPA zone as established by this Specific Plan and the corresponding Planning Area standards for each Planning Area.
19. All grading within the specific plan shall be performed in accordance with the following conditions and development criteria:
a. All grading shall take place in accordance with the City's adopted policies in effect at the time permits are issued and the grading criteria contained in the Specific Plan.
NOBLE CREEK VISTAS SPECIFIC PLAN
Conditions of Approval
b. Where cut and fill slopes are created in excess of 5 feet in vertical cut height or 3 feet in vertical fill height, detailed landscaping and irrigation plans shall be submitted to the City prior to approval of grading plans. The plans will be reviewed for type and density of ground cover, seed mix, plant materials, staking details, and sizes and irrigation systems.
20. Applicants shall incorporate the following defensible space concepts into the design of projects which shall be included within all development plans and reviewed and approved by the City Police Department prior to approval of implementing projects:
a. Circulation for pedestrians, vehicles and police patrols. b. Lighting of streets, walkways, bikeways, and commercial and industrial areas. c. Visibility of doors and windows from the street and between buildings. d. Fencing heights and materials.
21. In the event that, during or following grading of the project site or portions thereof, economic or other conditions prevent the Developer(s) from continuing with the project within a reasonable amount of time, as determined by the City, the City shall so notify the Developer(s) who shall contact the City Planning Department to identify necessary activities that the Developer must implement to protect public safety and minimize/prevent environmental degradation, particularly due to wind and water erosion. The Developer(s) shall be required to reimburse the City for the cost of activities to satisfy this condition.
23. Each developer shall use its best efforts to ensure that all construction contractors and subcontractors properly dispose of all wastes generated in permitted landfills or with a licensed recycling company. If any improper dumping of construction waste occurs, the developer of the portion of the Specific Plan area from which such wastes were taken shall guarantee reimbursement to the City of costs incurred by it associated with clean up, proper disposal, any necessary revegetation and legal penalties and remedies.
24. Construction areas shall be fenced as required by the City to preclude the creation of an attractive nuisance and to limit access to and disturbance of sensitive habitat areas.
25. An obsolete exhibit is contained in the Specific Plan document for Planning Area 2. Said exhibit shall be replaced with the correct exhibit in the final document.
26. Any front setbacks which may be proposed which are less than 20 feet, such as for side -entry garages as provided for in the Specific Plan, shall be subject to the review and approval of the Planning Commission in the form of a Plot Plan.
NOBLE CREEK VISTAS SPECIFIC PLAN
Conditions of Approval
CIRCULATION PLAN CONDITIONS
27. The Circulation Plan contained in the Specific Plan shall be modified as follows:
a. The cross-section for Beaumont Avenue shall be modified to reflect a divided two- lane roadway, based upon the County of Riverside standard for an industrial collector, with a right-of-way of 78 feet and a curb -to -curb width of 52 feet. b. The cross-section for Noble Creek Parkway shall be modified to reflect a divided two-lane roadway, based upon the County of Riverside standard for an industrial collector, with a right-of-way of 78 feet and a curb -to -curb width of 52 feet. c. The City shall not issue any certificates of occupancy for the Project until the improvements contemplated by the Specific Plan to the following streets and intersections have been completed: the intersections of Beaumont Avenue and Oak Valley Parkway, Beaumont Avenue and Cougar Way, Beaumont Avenue and Brookside Avenue and Beaumont Avenue and Cherry Valley Boulevard.
Specifically, the improvements will result in compliance with the level of service required in the mitigation measures approved by the City for the Project
PHASING CONDITIONS
28. Construction of the development permitted hereby, including recordation of final subdivision maps, may be conducted progressively in stages, provided adequate vehicular access, infrastructure and public services are provided for all dwelling units and non-residential land uses in each stage of development, and further, provided that such phase of development conforms substantially with the intent and purpose of the Specific Plan Master Phasing Program and subsequent amendment as determined by the Planning Director.
PARKS AND RECREATION CONDITIONS
29. Development of the property shall be accompanied by the concurrent phased dedication and improvement of not less than 15.44 acres of fully improved and usable park area. That phased dedication shall be to the City for maintenance by a Community Facilities District or other suitable maintenance entity as determined by the City, and shall be accomplished as described below. Due to the non -definitive nature of the Specific Plan's parks program, the following requirements shall be applicable to each individual development within the Noble Creek Specific Plan area:
NOBLE CREEK VISTAS SPECIFIC PLAN
Conditions of Approval
a. It is recognized that the Noble Creek Specific Plan is composed of several ownerships, and that park facilities shown in the Specific Plan are not proportionately assigned to the development areas which correspond with individual ownerships. As a result, the design, development and maintenance of park facilities shall be accomplished by the City through its Community Facilities District, and funded by the landowners and ultimate occupants of the project.
b. Prior to, or concurrent with, the recordation of any final subdivision map, the respective developer shall have the necessary assurances and financial commitments in place to ensure compliance with the applicable park requirements.
30. Prior to recordation of the first implementing subdivision map, Applicants shall obtain City (and, if necessary, LAFCO) approval for the formation of a Community Facilities District or other appropriate financing mechanism, as determined by the City, to ensure the perpetual maintenance of dedicated lands for parks and recreational purposes, and for maintenance of other landscaped areas contained within public rights -of -way, or held in fee title by the City of Beaumont.
INFRASTRUCTURE CONDITIONS
31. Drainage and flood control facilities and improvements shall be provided in accordance with Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District requirements. A detailed engineered hydrology study shall be submitted for the approval of the Public Works Director prior to the recordation of any subdivision map.
32. An amendment to CEQA required the preparation of a program to ensure that all mitigation measures are fully and completely implemented. The Environmental Impact Report (EIR) prepared for the Noble Creek Specific Plan imposes certain mitigation measures on the project. Certain conditions of approval for the Noble Creek Specific Plan constitute self contained reporting/monitoring programs for certain mitigation measures. At the time of approval of subsequent development applications, further environmental reporting/monitoring programs may be established if additional mitigation is determined to be necessary through further environmental review. The mitigation monitoring program for the Noble Creek Specific Plan EIR is hereby incorporated and performance of the mitigation measures set forth therein is a condition of approval of the Specific Plan.
33. Through Community Facilities District No. 93-1, an assessment district and/or through payment of development impact fees, the Developer shall be responsible for funding the project's fair share infrastructure and facility costs, as will be determined by the City of Beaumont Comprehensive Public Facilities Financing Plan.
NOBLE CREEK VISTAS SPECIFIC PLAN
Conditions of Approval
34. Right-of-way shall be provided for and dedicated for the ultimate improvement of all roadways within or adjoining the project area in accordance with the City of Beaumont General Plan Circulation Element and the Noble Creek Vistas Specific Plan.
35. Prior to the recordation of any subdivision map for any properties fronting Beaumont Avenue, a detailed alignment study shall be prepared for the review and approval of the Planning Director and Public Works Director. The alignment study shall be accompanied by a report prepared by a qualified arborist and any recommendations necessary to protect the long-term health and viability of the trees.
36. As portions of property which adjoin the portion of Cougar Way, west of Beaumont Avenue, are developed, full -width road improvements shall provided therewith.
Exhibit C
BEAUMONT AVENUE CONCEPTUAL PLAN
STREET SECTION EXHIBIT
gist
TRACT
BOUNDARY
WOOD FENCE c
OR BLOCK WALL
P
78'
a nwa���v vt.t+rv\ 39'
D.G. WALK
5f6r LANDSC PEt PAI k%kY
TYPICAL HALF- SECTION BEAUMONT AVENUE
NO SCALE
Exhibit D
BROOKSIDE AVENUE TRANSITION TO NOBLE CREEK PARKWAY
CONCEPTUAL PLAN
BROOKSIDE TRANSITION EXHIBIT
BROOKSIDE AVE
BEAUMONT AVE
Exhibit E
[Sample) NOTIFICATION OF SETTLEMENT
RECORDING REQUESTED BY
AND WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO:
Robert C. Goodman, Esq.
Law Offices of Robert C. Goodman
177 Post Street, Suite 750
San Francisco, CA 94108
Space Above This Line for Recorder's Use
MEMORANDUM OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
To Whom It May Concern:
A. [Property Owner] own rcal property, commonly known as in the County of Riverside, California, and more particularly described in Exhibit A hereto ("the Property").
B. The Property, and certain property adjacent to it is part of the Noble Creek Vistas project ("the Project"), and was the subject of an action brought in the Riverside County Superior Court, captioned Cherry Valley Pass Acres and Neighbors v. City of Beaumont, et al. (Case No. RIC 427282) ("the Action")
C. The parties to the Action entered into a Settlement Agreement and Final Stipulated Judgment (the "Settlement Agreement"), which was entered by the Court on , 2006. The Settlement Agreement affects the Property. A copy of the Settlement Agreement is attached hereto as Exhibit B.
D. The parties to the Settlement Agreement agreed to certain modifications of the Conditions of Approval for the Project, originally approved by the City Council of the City of Beaumont on February 15, 2005, as more fully set forth in the Settlement Agreement. The Settlement Agreement provides that certain commitments trade therein shall be binding upon each successive owner of the Property, and shall run with the land. Interested parties in the Property should consult legal counsel regarding the legal implications of the Settlement Agreement.
E. Nothing in this Memorandum is intended, nor shall it be construed, to alter, amend, modify or supersede any of the terms of the Settlement Agreement.
Dated: , 2006
By
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF
) ss.
On this day of , 2006 before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of California, duly commissioned and sown, personally appeared personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she executed the same in his/her authorized capacity, and that by his/her signature on the instrument the person, or entity upon behalf of which the person acted, executed the instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Notary Public
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
PROOF OF SERVICE BY MAIL
I, Daniel An, declare as follows:
I am employed in the City and County of San Francisco, California. I am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to the within action. My business address is 177 Post Street, Suite 750, San Francisco, California 94108, which is located in the county where the mailing described below took place.
I am readily familiar with the regular collection and processing practices at my place of business for mailing with the United States Postal Service. Correspondence so collected and processed is deposited with the United States Postal Service that same day in the ordinary course of business.
On May 18, 2006, at San Francisco, California, the following document:
SET 1LEMENT AGREEMENT AND FINAL STIPULATED JUDGMENT
was placed for deposit in the United States Postal Service in a sealed envelope, with postage fully prepaid, addressed to:
Leonard Polyakov
Karen J. Lee
Newmeyer & Dillion LLP
895 Dove Street, Fifth Floor
Newport Beach, CA 92660
Joseph S. Aklufi
Aklufi & Wysocki
3403 Tenth Street, Suite 610
Riverside, CA 92501
and that envelope was placed for collection and mailing on that date following ordinary business practices.
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed at San Francisco, California, May 18, 2006.
Daniel An
PROOF OF SERVICE BY MAIL
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 11
12 13
14 15
16 17
18 19
20 21
22 23
24 25
26 I, Daniel An, declare as follows:
I am employed in the City and County of San Francisco, California. I am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to the within action. My business address is 177 Post Street, Suite 750, San Francisco, California 94108, which is located in the county where the mailing described below took place.
I am readily familiar with the regular collection and processing practices at my place of business for mailing with the United States Postal Service. Correspondence so collected and processed is deposited with the United States Postal Service that same day in the ordinary course of business.
On June 19, 2006, at San Francisco, California, the following document:
NOTICE OF ENTRY OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
AND FINAL STIPULATED JUDGMENT
was placed for deposit in the United States Postal Service in a sealed envelope, with postage fully prepaid, addressed to:
Leonard Polyakov
Karen J. Lee
Newmeyer & Dillion LLP
895 Dove Street, Fifth Floor
Newport Beach, CA 92660
Joseph S. Aklufi
Aklufi & Wysocki
3403 Tenth Street, Suite 610
Riverside, CA 92501
and that envelope was placed for collection and mailing on that date following ordinary business practices.
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed at San Francisco, California, June 19, 2006.
Daniel An
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION
PC2025-01
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
BEAUMONT RECOMMENDING REPEAL OF THE NOBLE CREEK VISTAS
SPECIFIC PLAN (PLAN 2025-0204)
WHEREAS, on or about February 15, 2005, the Beaumont City Council passed Resolution 2005- 11 certifying the Noble Creek Vistas Specific Plan ("NCVSP") EIR No. 01-1 and approving NCVSP Specific Plan No. 01-1;
WHEREAS, on March 17, 2005, an action was filed challenging the City's certification of the EIR entitled Cherry Valley Pass Acres and Neighbors v. City of Beaumont (no. RIC 427282) ("Action") which was settled in its entirety pursuant to a Settlement Agreement and Final Stipulated Judgement approved by the court on May 31, 2006 ("Settlement Agreement"); WHEREAS, NCVSP was republished and/or approved as of October of 2006; and WHEREAS, NCVSP was amended in or about June of 2014; and WHEREAS, Beaumont Municipal Code Section 17.03.140 provides that the adoption and amendment of specific plans are subject to Section 17.03.140 and Section 65450 et seq. of the California Government Code; and
WHEREAS, Government Code Section 65453 provides that a specific plan shall be prepared, adopted, and amended (including repeal) in the same manner as a general plan, except that a specific plan may be adopted by ordinance or resolution as often as deemed necessary by the City Council;
WHEREAS, on April 9, 2025, the Planning Commission opened a noticed public hearing regarding the repeal of the NCVSP and continued the public hearing without discussion to the May 14, 2025, Planning Commission meeting.
WHEREAS After duly conducting the hearing on May 14, 2025, the Commission adopted this resolution recommending to the City Council its repeal of the NCVSP.
WHEREAS, Prior to adopting or amending a general plan or specific plan, the city council shall hold at least one public hearing, notice of which shall be given pursuant to government Code Section 65090.
WHEREAS, certain land consisting of approximately 41.26 acres in Planning Area 2 within the NCVSP has been acquired by the San Gorgonio Pass Water Agency for recharge ponds, not originally contemplated by the NCVSP;
WHEREAS, the City acquired 29.33 acres within the NCVSP for the purpose of entitling and building constructing a police station;
WHEREAS, because of the changed circumstances and other reasons the NCVSP is no longer feasible for the development of the land within its boundaries; WHEREAS, the NCVSP should be repealed for the reasons stated in the foregoing Recitals and for other reasons contained in the record;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Beaumont as follows:
Section 1. Recitals
The above recitals are hereby incorporated herein by this reference.
Section 2. Administrative Record.
The Planning Commission has considered all of the evidence submitted into the administrative record for the recommendations listed in this Resolution, including but not limited to, the following:
(a) Beaumont, California — Code of Ordinances and Beaumont General Plan; (b) The Noble Creek Vistas Specific Plan ("NCVSP"), and documents associated therewith, and Exhibit "A" thereto (Maps of the Specific Plan pg 8-10, 14-15 of SP) as well as the amendment dated June of 2014;
(c) All environmental documents, including but not limited to, the Environmental Impact Report ("EIR"), public comments in response to the EIR, and final EIR; (d) Settlement Agreement;
(e) Staff Report;
(f) Staff presentation at the public hearing conducted at the Planning Commission meeting; (g) Testimony and/or comments from interested parties submitted to the City in both written and oral form at, or prior to, the public hearing conducted at the Planning Commission meeting;
(h) Public comments, both written and oral, received and/or submitted at, or prior to, the public hearing conducted at the Planning Commission meeting.
(i) All other documents in the possession of the City and relevant to this Resolution.
Section 3. Environmental Findings.
Further, the Repeal of the Specific Plan Amendment is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3), because it can be seen with certainty that the proposed action will not have any effect or any substantial effect on the environment. The proposed Repeal returns the development standards that were previously existing prior to the adoption of NCVSP as amended. No new
changes to the development standards in these areas would be made. The return of these standards to those previously existing or thereafter amended will not have an environmental impact.
Section 4. Findings for Specific Plan.
The Planning Commission has considered all of the evidence submitted into the administrative record for the proposed repeal of the Noble Creek Vistas Specific Plan and in accordance with
17.03.140 of the Beaumont, California — Code of Ordinances, bases its recommendation of repeal of the NCVSP on the following findings.
(a) The subject property is no longer physically suitable for the land use designation(s) and the anticipated land use development(s) identified in the NCVSP; (b) The NCVSP is now outdated and no longer feasible for development. Repeal of the NCVSP will not adversely affect surrounding properties in that it will return to its previous state, which was previously compatible with the surrounding neighborhood; (c) Repeal of the NCVSP will not affect the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City.
Section 5. Repeal of Specific Plan
The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council repeal the Noble Creek Vistas Specific Plan.
Section 6. Severability
That if any provision, section, paragraph, sentence or word of this Resolution be rendered or declared invalid by any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction or by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences or words of this Resolution as hereby adopted shall remain in full force and effect.
Section 7. Effective Date
That this Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its passage.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Beaumont, California, held on the 14th day of May 2025, by the following roll call vote:
AYES: KobI v. Cueva, Pik, 50v t1g %
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT: Gook?
By:
Phili .t: outhard, hair
City of Beaumont
ATTEST:
By:
Nicdle Wheelwright
Deputy City Clerk
Nobel Creek Meadows, LLC
9595 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 700
Beverly Hills, CA 90212
May 13, 2025
CITY OF BEAUMONT
550 East Sixth Street
Beaumont, CA 92223
Attention: Melody Arechiga, Senior Planner
Sent Via Electronic Mail
Subject: PLAN2025-0204 to Consider Repeal of the Noble Creek Vistas Specific Plan May 14, 2025 Planning Commission Item C.2
Honorable Planning Commissioners:
On behalf of the property owners, Nobel Creek Meadows, LLC. Project Dimensions, Inc. has been retained to represent the owners in matters related to the planning, entitlement and development of the property (APN 400-250-008). As you may know, this vacant 94 -acre parcel is currently designated as Residential and Open Space Planning Areas 7, 8, 9A/B and 11 in the Noble Creek Vistas Specific Plan (NCVSP). This ownership is also the only component of the Specific Plan that was processed as a residential development project, making substantial progress to obtain subdivision map approval as well as the required development permits before the previous developer allowed some of these approvals to expire.
Project Dimensions started working with Carole Kendrick on preparation of a revised development concept for the property in early 2024, followed with a Pre -Application Review submittal in September 2024. The plan proposal included mixed residential products between 570 and 630 units that largely preserved many of the project development features (Street Improvement Plans for Beaumont Avenue, Cougar Way and Mountain View Avenue; Extension of Noble Creek Parkway and Cougar Way; Noble Creek Collector Gravity Sewer; Noble Creek Channel Protection Plan, etc.) for TTM No. 29267. The plan also included numerous open space and recreational amenities.
Since the October 24, 2024 DRC Meeting (PIan2024-0110) and receipt of the City's Preliminary Review Findings, the applicant's design and technical team has made substantial progress to prepare a formal application [as requested by the City] that includes the following components:
1. Draft Tentative "A" Tract Map
2. Conceptual Grading and Utility Plans
3. Preliminary Hydrology Study
4. Preliminary WQMP
5. Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation
6. Technical Site Plan (provided as an attachment for your reference)
7. New Draft Noble Creek Specific Plan (including landscape and architectural details) In addition, throughout our discussions with Carole Kendrick, the applicant's team was encouraged to be proactive in the preparation of all required CEQA documentation and resource agency approvals [Pre -Application included a Project CEQA Approach description]. As discussed in the CEQA approach, our consultant, EPD Solutions, Inc. has made the recommendation to prepare a Subsequent EIR for the current project proposal. This approach allows the tiering of relevant
CITY OF BEAUMONT
PLAN2025-0204 to Consider Repeal of the Noble Creek Vistas Specific Plan May 14, 2025 Planning Commission Item C.2
2 information from the Noble Creek Vistas Specific Plan Consolidated EIR that has also been incorporated into the City's General Plan, Zoning and subsequently processed jurisdictional permitting, in addition to resource agency mitigation clearances.
More specifically, the previous applicant had, or was in the process of obtaining clearances for:
• Streambed Alteration Agreement 1600-2017-0076-R6 from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife
• A Determination of Biologically Equivalent or Superior Preservation Report (DBESP) • Burrowing Owl Protection and Relocation Plan from CDFW and USFWS • A Habitat Mitigation and Monitoring Plan for the Noble Creek Meadows Mitigation Site • Securing final mitigation clearances for project -related impacts to Los Angeles Pocket Mouse through the purchase of 30.6 -acres of designated habitat from the Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority for $151,530.89 (payment made on 6/10/2020).
In reliance on direction provided by the City, EPD Solutions, Inc. has made substantial progress to complete an Administrative Draft EIR for the project. In support of the Subsequent EIR and the previously mentioned Tentative Tract Map studies, the applicant's technical team has produced:
• General Biological Assessment for
Assessor's Parcel Number 400-250-008
• Aquatic Resource Delineation Report
• Wastewater Hydraulic Modeling Study
• ASTM Phase I Environmental Site
Assessment
• Phase I Cultural Resources Survey
• Paleontological Resources Assessment
Additionally, to support the implementation of Tract Map No. 29267, numerous dedications have been made by the property owners to facilitate the implementation of public streets and other circulation and infrastructure improvements as described previously. Dedication of the Noble Creek stream course abutting the property to the City has also been made. Easements have also been recorded throughout the property providing access and conveyance of surface water flows over the property to the City and various other utility providers. All of these existing encumbrances intended to support development of the property in accordance with the adopted NCVSP.
Last of all, the City of Beaumont's RHNA requirement assesses a total allocation of 4,210 units for the October 2021 to October 2029 planning period. The City Housing Element currently allocates 274 units to the NCVSP in the Above -Moderate -Income category. The current proposed 586 -unit project would supplement local housing production by providing an additional 312 -unit mix of homes and price points to further meet City and regional housing needs. This variety is specifically intended to accommodate a range of income levels and family lifestyles (market based) that will be located immediately adjacent to both established and proposed recreation, commercial and all grade levels of school facilities.
In closing, thank you in advance for your consideration of the above noted points. Given the substantial investment of time and funds to prepare a formal Project Application for City's consideration, we would respectively request that the Planning Commission give consideration to a recommendation to the City Council for postponement of any final decision related to the repeal of the Noble Creek Vistas Specific Plan until such time that it can be determined that our project
CITY OF BEAUMONT
PLAN2025-0204 to Consider Repeal of the Noble Creek Vistas Specific Plan May 14, 2025 Planning Commission Item C.2
3 proposal will not be adversely affected by the City's proposed action. We would also like to apologize for not being able to attend the hearing in person due to our receiving notice of this hearing only recently. In the future, it would be appreciated if Project Dimensions, Inc. could be added to the City's Interested Parties List for the above referenced property so that we can be involved in any future dialog regarding the planning of this area.
Sincerely,
for
Nobel C Meadows, LLC
Copies: City of Beaumont Planning Commissioners
Gustavo J. Romo, Deputy City Manager
Greg Scott, Managing Partner, Nobel Creek Meadows, LLC
Attachment: Noble Creek Technical Site Plan Exhibit
/
/
/
NOBLE CREEK
REGIONAL PARK
CITY OF BEAUMONT
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
V
/
\
\
i
i
A
AA
a
-\
a
1Vo
VV
ooh
—
\\
,,
a
a
d
a _
.a
\
\
L
-a
1 \
a
J
D
OAK VALLEY PARKWAY
a
a
D
a
a
D
a
D
-
�
1 J
f
p`1
1 -
a
f
I-
1 J
f
p_
a
a
a
\
1 PASS WATER AGENCY
BASIN SITE
MOUNTAIN VIEW
MIDDLE SCHOOL
COUGAR WAY
ITRANCE
LEGEND
SETBACK
40' x 50' BUILDING
35' x 40' BUILDING
SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED (3,600 SF)
SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED (4,500 SF)
SOLANA (CLUSTER - 8 PACK)
SONOMA (CLUSTER - 6 PACK)
HORIZONS (TOWNHOMES)
TOTAL
82 DU
103 DU
126 DU
115 DU
160 DU
586 DU
100' 0' 50' 100' 200'
SCALE: 1" = 100'
NOBLE CREEK
CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN
JANUARY 16, 2025
AWN-
i�
ENGINEERING
6390 Greenwich Dr, Suite 170
San Diego, Ca 92122
858.554.1500
fuscoe.com
JOB NO.
662—006
DRAWN BY:
RR
SHEET
1 of 1
F:\PROJECTS\662\006\EXHIBITS\662-006 EXH TECH SITE PLAN.DWG (04-08-2025 4:34:15PM) Plotted by: KKozlik
Column
INTERIM AD DRAFT
This is the proof of your ad scheduled to run in The Press -Enterprise on the dates indicated below.
If changes are needed, please contact us prior to deadline at (951) 368-9229.
Notice ID: WIWXE7jymezf2o68mKKj I Proof Updated: May. 27, 2025 at 11:02am PDT Notice Name: PLAN2025-0204 - Repeal of Noble Creek SP
FILER
Melody Arechiga
[email protected]
(951) 769-8520
Columns Wide: 4
FILING FOR
The Press -Enterprise
Ad Class: Legals
05/30/2025: City Notices 255.53
Subtotal $255.53
Tax % 0
Total $255.53
See Proof on Next Page
PLAN2025-0204 - Repeal of Noble Creek SP - Page 1 of 2
LEGAL ADVERTISEMENT
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the city of Beaumont will conduct a public hearing to consider the matter described below. The City Council public hearing will be held at 6:00 p.m. on Tuesday, June 17, 2025, at 550 East Sixth Street, Beaumont, California.
RESOLUTION PLAN2025-0204, Conduct a public hearing and
consideration of a resolution repealing the Noble Creek Vistas Specific Plan. The proposed application is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15061 (b) (3), because it can be seen with certainty that the proposed action will not have any effect or any substantial effect on the environment. (AP N5: 400-250-002, 400-250-012, 400-250-010, 400-250- 008, 404-140-001, 404-140-002, 404-140-003, 404-010-010, 404-010-017, 404- 010-011,404-010-016,400-250-013,400-250-009,400-250-011).
The applicant for this protect is City of Beaumont.
Public comments can be made in person, using the public comment phone line or by written email_ Phone -1n comments will be accepted by calling the designated public comment phone line (951) 922- 4845 prior to the corresponding item. Public comments shall not exceed three minutes unless otherwise authorized by City Council.
Written comments can be emalled to [email protected] Public comments accepted via email will be read aloud during the corresponding item of the meeting. Comments can be submitted any time prior to the meeting as well as during the meeting until the end of the corresponding item.
This meeting will be conducted in person and also will be recorded for live streaming. All City of Beaumont public meetings will be made available via live streaming and made available on the City's official YouTube webpage. Please use the following link during the meeting for live stream access: BeaumontCa.gov/Livestream
Melody Arechiga
Senior Planner
[email protected]
The Press -Enterprise
Published: 5/30/25
PL,AN2025-0204 - Repeal of Noble Creek SP - Page 2 of 2
��unluluuuly
iArlllllllllllll�
•— IIIIIIIIIIIilluq
unuum-1.
Inumy,�_.�.�
so
,* ivi`,,alntis i Q still ..•
.aaaaar� • 4JII........ •inu1111� o =
ll%plO.InIII1111111III IIIIIIIIIIIIIIlIIIIuIIIIIII
�7t,≤: �111111uu1 .unnn.n.unnln. ul/'ai
] ''''''''' IIIIIIII1111111111111111 1M- i r7t .i �IIIIIIII a►��q—.1 S Illlllllll% blIlllllll111/111 .t _� •_. 11 ., , �.u.unw.uA
300' Radius Map
g 1111111111111111111111
=111111.
C 111111111 =111111 11111
EIllllJi 11111
111111 III"
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII II =_
111111111111111111111 11 "
0'4111Iu11 __ 11111102M
t 1111r' X111=�,
■_
51111/t1111111111111111111'=4
rik
!'illllll�l I I It 1111
lIIIIIIIIIIIIII
_ IllllllllluIll
= f= `psi`
400-250-002, 400-250-012, 400-250-010, 400-250-008, 404-140-007, 404-140-002, 404-140-003, 404-010-010, 404-010-017, 404-010-011, 404-010-016, 400-250-013, 400-250-009, 400-250-011
400441006
CHEN FAMILY TRUST DTD 5/15/21
3486 CASTLEFORD PL
ROWLAND HEIGHTS CA 91748
400432007
MEDALEN ALEX
1746 DOUBLE EAGLE AVE
BEAUMONT CA 92223
400421007
ANGLIN JEREMY T
703 GOLF AVE
BEAUMONT CA 92223
400482017
MCKIBBAN STEVEN
1610 PRIMROSE AVE
BEAUMONT CA 92223
400462008
ZAMARIA JOHN D
713 INDIGO ST
BEAUMONT CA 92223
400461018
WAGNER KENNETH D
732 COPPER CIR
BEAUMONT CA 92223
404150005
DELEON OLIVAR ISMAEL
1540 MOUNTAIN VIEW TR
BEAUMONT CA 92223
414370006
BEAUMONT HOLDINGS
3313 W WARNER AVE
SANTA ANA CA 92704
404010007
SUNNY -CAL EGG & POULTRY INC
37251 CHERRY VALLEY BLVD
CHERRY VALLEY. CA 92223
400440006
LUNGU CONSTANTIN & CORNELIA OUV1ER LIVING TRUST DTD 09/01123 1729 SILVER CT
BEAUMONT CA 92223
400420019
NGUYEN OEN & JEAN_ _ FAMILY TRUST DATED IC CE
9887 WHITE RIVER CIR
FOUNTAIN VALLEY CA 92708
404150012
BENAVIDES LINDA
1553 MOUNTAIN VIEW TR
BEAUMONT CA 92223
400432012
CITY OF BEAUMONT
PO BOX 158
BEAUMONT CA 92223
400462016
KOKOYACHUK MARTA
1686 GOLDEN WAY
BEAUMONT CA 92223
400482026
RAMIREZ JOE & SUSAN RAMIREZ TRUST 12/26/1995
702 WHITEBARK
MISSION VIEJO CA 92692
404151004
HUSBANDS SHARMAYNE
1503 MOUNTAIN VIEW TR
BEAUMONT CA 92223
404150007
KOCH BRANDON
1536 MOUNTAIN VIEW TR
BEAUMONT CA 92223
400461008
CHOI VINCENT HOI LEUNG
310 W CYPRES AVE
MONROVIA CA 91016
400250008
NOBEL CREEK MEADOWS
9595 WILSHIRE BLV NO 700
BEVERLY HILLS CA 90212
400481015
GREEN VANESSA
1635 PRIMROSE AVE
BEAUMONT CA 92223
400482020
VASQUEZ CARLOS
1628 PRIMROSE AVE
BEAUMONT CA 92223
400250001
CALIF OAK VALLEY GOLF & RESORT
15957 AURORA CREST DR
WHITTIER CA 90605
404140004
CITY OF BEAUMONT
PO BOX 158
BEAUMONT CA 92223
415020010
TARDY ADAM DAVID
109 OAK VALLEY PKY
BEAUMONT CA 92223
404010017
SAN GORGONIO PASS WATER AGENCY
1210 BEAUMONT AVE
BEAUMONT CA 92223
414370009
BEAUMONT HOLDINGS
3313 W WARNER AVE
SANTA ANA CA 92704
400420022
JNO TRUST UDT 05/27/2021
56190 NEZ PERCE
YUCCA VALLEY CA 92284
404182001
FIGUEROA SANTOS A
503 CEDAR VIEW DR
BEAUMONT CA 92223
400462019
NUTTALL WILLIAM
1702 GOLDEN WAY
BEAUMONT CA 92223
400481024
CERRATO DORIS 0
1634 IVY CT
BEAUMONT CA 92223
400440003
SHAH ANANDKUMAR
1710 GOLDEN WAY
BEAUMONT CA 92223
404150010
VALDEZ DONALD
1541 MOUNTAIN VIEW TR
BEAUMONT CA 92223
404150002
SUFFICOOL STANLEY
1556 MOUNTAIN VIEW TR
BEAUMONT CA 92223
400481018
CONIGLIO BARBARA
1617 PRIMROSE AVE
BEAUMONT CA 92223
404010013
CITY OF BEAUMONT
550 E 6TH ST
BEAUMONT CA 92223
404150019
AVILA MARIO
1581 MOUNTAIN VIEW TRL
BEAUMONT CA 92223
400440009
GIRKIN FAMILY TRUST DTD 11/14/23
1721 SILVER CT
BEAUMONT CA 92223
404151005
LABONTE MICHAEL
1509 MOUNTAIN VIEW TR
BEAUMONT CA 92223
400482023
PETTIT RICHARD K
1640 PRIMROSE AVE
BEAUMONT CA 92223
404150017
GILMOUR NICHOLAS C
1573 MOUNTAIN VIEW TR
BEAUMONT CA 92223
400482029
PRICE ROGER F
710 FLOWER ST
BEAUMONT CA 92223
403200010
UYEMURA AMY ODA
2901 PEBBLE DR
CORONA DEL MAR CA 92625
400420003
HERSHEY BRIAN J
1783 LONG DR
BEAUMONT CA 92223
404150016
SANTIAGO ENRIQUE
1569 MOUNTAIN VIEW TR
BEAUMONT CA 92223
400482021
FLORES ANDRES
1632 PRIMROSE AVE
BEAUMONT CA 92223
400250002
BEAUMONT UNIFIED SCHOOL DIST
PO BOX 187
BEAUMONT CA 92223
404150013
BURKE JACOB R
1557 MOUNTAIN VIEW TR
BEAUMONT CA 92223
404151008
BARRERA CARLOS
1521 MOUNTAIN VIEW TR
BEAUMONT CA 92223
404140003
GINSBURG ALLEN H MD
208 YACHT CLUB WAY
REDONDO BEACH CA 90277
404151002
ORTA YADIRA DENISE
1522 MOUNTAIN VIEW TR
BEAUMONT CA 92223
400432010
HUANG GUAN WU
3209 ISABEL AVE
ROSEMEAD CA 91770
405240005
BEAUMONT UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
P O BOX 187
BEAUMONT CA 92223
400420023
CITY OF BEAUMONT
P O BOX 158
BEAUMONT CA 92223
414370038
BEAUMONT HOLDINGS
3313 W WARNER AVE
SANTA ANA CA 92704
400440004
ARSENAULT FAMILY LIVING TRUST DTD 11 07 22
1712 GOLDEN WAY
BEAUMONT CA 92223
403200011
BEAUMONT UNIFIED SCHOOL DIST
P O BOX 187
BEAUMONT CA 92223
400420017
CORDOVA DEBRA A
704 GOLF AVE
BEAUMONT CA 92223
400462014
SMITH NGINA
1672 GOLDEN WAY
BEAUMONT CA 92223
404150008
RAMIREZ JOSE G
1533 MOUNTAIN VIEW TR
BEAUMONT CA 92223
400482012
REGALADO RAYMOND
713 STARGAZER ST
BEAUMONT CA 92223
400461014
LE HAU QUOC
712 INDIGO ST
BEAUMONT CA 92223
400481019
NIETO ARLENE C TRUST DTD 10/4/18
710 STARGAZER ST
BEAUMONT CA 92223
400420004
MASON LUCEN LLOYD JR & ! INDA ANN MASON LMING TRUST 411421 1779 LONG DR
BEAUMONT CA 92223
400441001
DEGASPERIN MICHAEL R
1715 GOLDEN WAY
BEAUMONT CA 92223
404151001
MOLLER GREGORY ALLEN
1524 MOUNTAIN VIEW TR
BEAUMONT CA 92223
400482024
MORGEN JOHN B TRUST DTD 11/16/23
1644 PRIMROSE AVE
BEAUMONT CA 92223
400481013
WHITE JAMES A II
709 FLOWER ST
BEAUMONT CA 92223
404150020
MENDEZ ALVARO P
1585 MOUNTAIN VIEW TR
BEAUMONT CA 92223
400441007
KRAUT ROSALYN M
1695 JADE CT
BEAUMONT CA 92223
404150014
SALAS CHRISTOPHER JOHN
1561 MOUNTAIN VIEW TR
BEAUMONT CA 92223
400482018
HYLTON D MERCEDES
1618 PRIMROSE AVE
BEAUMONT CA 92223
400432008
FEDELE DOUGLAS
1748 DOUBLE EAGLE AVE
BEAUMONT CA 92223
400462011
ET FINANCIAL NETWORK
3048 HACIENDA BLVD
HACIENDA HEIGHTS CA 91745
404010001
CITY OF BEAUMONT
550 E 6TH ST
BEAUMONT CA 92223
414370007
BEAUMONT HOLDINGS
3313 W WARNER AVE
SANTA ANA CA 92704
404151003
ADAME MARISA A
1518 MOUNTAIN VIEW TR
BEAUMONT CA 92223
400481022
CORRENTI RALPH & LOUISE FAMILY TRUST DATED
PO BOX 66
BEAUMONT CA 92223
400420020
BLAUSTEIN JOSEPH HERBERT
1774 LONG DR
BEAUMONT CA 92223
404010010
BEAUMONT UNIFIED SCHOOL DIST
PO BOX 187
BEAUMONT CA 92223
400461017
FRANKLIN NIKELLE
730 COPPER CIR
BEAUMONT CA 92223
400461011
DENILA LELANIE FUENTES
1685 GOLDEN WAY
BEAUMONT CA 92223
400462017
MARTIN BARBARA
1690 GOLDEN WAY
BEAUMONT CA 92223
400440001
::7IC!A A REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST DATED 0&10119
1704 GOLDEN WAY
BEAUMONT CA 92223
404151007
MARIN RICARDO
1517 MOUNTAIN VIEW TR
BEAUMONT CA 92223
400482015
WILKES LIVING TRUST DATED 12/08/2023
1604 PRIMROSE AVE
BEAUMONT CA 92223
400481016
WEISBERG BRANDI ROCHELLE
1631 PRIMROSE AVE
BEAUMONT CA 92223
400441004
DENILA CONRADO J
7535 WEAVER ST
HIGHLAND CA 92346
400420001
RAMIREZ ANDRES A
1789 LONG DR
BEAUMONT CA 92223
400482019
MCGARRY FAMILY TRUST DATED 09/15/2017
1624 PRIMROSE AVE
BEAUMONT CA 92223
400421005
PERKINS JESSICA A
707 GOLF AVE
BEAUMONT CA 92223
404190007
ABIFAKER BASIL MUNIR
6605 GRANITE CREST CT
SAN DIEGO CA 92130
400432009
PORTILLO MARIO
708 CADDIE ST
BEAUMONT CA 92223
404140007
SILVA FAMILY TRUST DATED 10/3/2007
2535 W WOODLAND DR
ANAHEIM CA 92801
414370010
BEAUMONT HOLDINGS
3313 W WARNER AVE
SANTA ANA CA 92704
400420021
HERNANDEZ JAVIER FUENTES
1780 LONG DR
BEAUMONT CA 92223
404150009
ALATORRE GUADALUPE
1537 MOUNTAIN VIEW TR
BEAUMONT CA 92223
404150004
SORAPURU MELISSA
1548 MOUNTAIN VIEW TR
BEAUMONT CA 92223
400461012
MOELLER ALEXANDRA R
1679 GOLDEN WAY
BEAUMONT CA 92223
400462012
SUMMERSFAMILY TRUST DTD 07/18/24
1660 GOLDEN WAY
BEAUMONT CA 92223
400462018
MOYEDA MARGARET
1696 GOLDEN WAY
BEAUMONT CA 92223
414020011
CTANG HOLDINGS
7950 CHERRY AVE STE 114
FONTANA CA 92336
400481017
GREEN DONALD W
1625 PRIMROSE AVE
BEAUMONT CA 92223
400250011
DIAMOND RIVERSIDE LTD PARTNERSHIP
550 E 6TH ST
BEAUMONT CA 92223
404010014
CITY OF BEAUMONT
550 E 6TH ST
BEAUMONT CA 92223
400440010
SffRNANDE&DIANE :3 N'.?NGTRUSTDTD1111017
1717 SILVER CT
BEAUMONT CA 92223
400482016
ANTINUCCI TRENT
1608 PRIMROSE AVE
BEAUMONT CA 92223
403200006
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONT
1995 MARKET ST
RIVERSIDE CA 92501
404150015
ZAVALA EDITH VILLARREAL
1565 MOUNTAIN VIEW TR
BEAUMONT CA 92223
400441005
2OULTER FAMLY REVOCABLE LMNG TRUST DATED 103f2019
1701 GOLDEN WAY
BEAUMONT CA 92223
400421008
LYONS JOHN B
701 GOLF AVE
BEAUMONT CA 92223
404150001
BEDOLLA ADALBERTO
1562 MOUNTAIN VIEW TR
BEAUMONT CA 92223
404150011
SAMANIEGO URIARTE JOSE CARLOS
1549 MOUNTAIN VIEW TR
BEAUMONT CA 92223
405240006
BEAUMONT UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
PO BOX 187
BEAUMONT CA 92223
400462009
GREGORY FAMILY LIVING TRUST USA DTD 1 2723
707 INDIGO ST
BEAUMONT CA 92223
404190006
BEAUMONT CA LEASED HOUSING ASSOC I
2905 NORTHWEST BLV NO 150
PLYMOUTH MN 55441
400250013
DIAMOND RIVERSIDE LTD PARTNERSHIP
550 E 6TH ST
BEAUMONT CA 92223
400440007
THOMAS MARQUINN 0
1727 SILVER CT
BEAUMONT CA 92223
400420018
ARIAS DOMINICK E
706 GOLF AVE
BEAUMONT CA 92223
404182011
CITY OF BEAUMONT
PO BOX 158
BEAUMONT CA 92223
400482013
MILLER CHARLES G
709 STARGAZER ST
BEAUMONT CA 92223
400462015
MURTAGH JAMES M
1680 GOLDEN WAY
BEAUMONT CA 92223
400461009
BUTLER MONTE & LISA FAMILY TRUST DTD 9129121
1698 ROSE AVE
BEAUMONT CA 92223
404151006
NAVARRO GUADALUPE H
PO BOX 1043
PATTON CA 92369
400482027
DIAZ JACOB
704 FLOWER ST
BEAUMONT CA 92223
400481014
MERLINO STEVEN C
178 FOX LN
CALIMESA CA 92320
404010002
CITY OF BEAUMONT
550 E 6TH ST
BEAUMONT CA 92223
400250009
CITY OF BEAUMONT
PO BOX 158
BEAUMONT CA 92223
400441002
BUTLER PATRICK M
1713 GOLDEN WAY
BEAUMONT CA 92223
404190002
GINSBURG ALLEN H
208 YACHT CLUB WAY
REDONDO BEACH CA 90277
400250001
CALIF OAK VALLEY GOLF & RESORT
15957 AURORA CREST DR
WHITTIER CA 90605
404150003
MARTINEZ JESUS JAVIER
1554 MOUNTAIN VIEW TR
BEAUMONT CA 92223
404010004
ORCHARD PARK APARTMENTS
69 NW NEWPORT AVE STE 200
BEND OR 97703
400421009
CITY OF BEAUMONT
PO BOX 158
BEAUMONT CA 92223
400462010
FELIX FAMILY TRUST DATED 05/04/2024
701 INDIGO ST
BEAUMONT CA 92223
404151009
PACHECO ISMAEL I
1525 MOUNTAIN VIEW TR
BEAUMONT CA 92223
414370008
BEAUMONT HOLDINGS
3313 W WARNER AVE
SANTA ANA CA 92704
404150018
GREEN TIMOTHY A
1577 MOUNTAIN VIEW TR
BEAUMONT CA 92223
400481023
KOWALSKI DONALD B
1628 IVY CT
BEAUMONT CA 92223
404190006
BEAUMONT CA LEASED HOUSING ASSOC I
2905 NORTHWEST BLV NO 150
PLYMOUTH MN 55441
400440002
VELA ARTURO C
1706 GOLDEN WAY
BEAUMONT CA 92223
404010011
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONT
1995 MARKET ST
RIVERSIDE CA 92501
414370040
BEAUMONT HOLDINGS
3313 W WARNER AVE
SANTA ANA CA 92704
404140006
CITY OF BEAUMONT
PO DRAWER 158
BEAUMONT CA 92223
404150006
KALOMBO AUBERTO KALOMBO WA
1538 MOUNTAIN VIEW TR
BEAUMONT CA 92223
400420002
RITARITA DEREK D
1785 LONG DR
BEAUMONT CA 92223
400482014
ALTMAN JEANETTE Y
703 STARGAZER ST
BEAUMONT CA 92223
400461010
SIPERA STEPHANI
1687 GOLDEN WAY
BEAUMONT CA 92223
400482028
COOPER RANDALL D & PENNY E LIVING TRUST DTD &30105
708 FLOWER ST
BEAUMONT CA 92223
415020007
GOGERBOCKER LIVING TRUST
1440 BEAUMONT STE A2-305
BEAUMONT CA 92223
400441003
HEINTZ WILLIAM W
1711 GOLDEN WAY
BEAUMONT CA 92223
400440008
ORLANDO BECKY LIVING TRUST DATED 12 18 2023
1725 SILVER CT
BEAUMONT CA 92223
400250010
SAN GORGONIO PASS WATER AGENCY
1210 BEAUMONT AVE
BEAUMONT CA 92223
400482022
WHELAN MICHAEL RICHARD
1636 PRIMROSE AVE
BEAUMONT CA 92223
400421006
SANKER REGINA L
705 GOLF AVE
BEAUMONT CA 92223
404140002
GINSBURG ALLEN H MD
208 YACHT CLUB WAY
REDONDO BEACH CA 90277
400462007
WALKER ANDREW
719 INDIGO ST
BEAUMONT CA 92223
400420024
CITY OF BEAUMONT
PO BOX 158
BEAUMONT CA 92223
404010006
ACEVEDO AUGUSTIN GARCIA
28120 ELLER WAY
MENIFEE CA 92585
400440005
NEES MATTHEW
1722 SILVER CT
BEAUMONT CA 92223
400481020
GARCIA JAVIER C
714 STARGAZER ST
BEAUMONT CA 92223
400462013
2018-4 IH BORROWER
PO BOX 4900
SCOTTSDALE AZ 85261
404010003
ORCHARD PARK APARTMENTS
69 NW NEWPORT AVE STE 200
BEND OR 97703
400420016
IORDAN CRISTIAN M
702 GOLF AVE
BEAUMONT CA 92223
404150025
LAU RAKESH NATH
1586 MOUNTAIN VIEW TR
BEAUMONT CA 92223
400461013
MARQUEZ THELMA
708 INDIGO ST
BEAUMONT CA 92223
404010016
SAN GORGONIO PASS WATER AGENCY
1210 BEAUMONT AVE
BEAUMONT CA 92223
404140005
CITY OF BEAUMONT
P O DRAWER 158
BEAUMONT CA 92223
400440011
CITY OF BEAUMONT
P O BOX 158
BEAUMONT CA 92223
400250012
SAN GORGONIO PASS WATER AGENCY
1210 BEAUMONT AVE
BEAUMONT CA 92223
400250014
BEAUMONT CHERRY VAL RECREATION & PARK DIST
P 0 BOX 490
BEAUMONT CA 92223
400250005
CITY OF BEAUMONT
PO DRAWER 158
BEAUMONT CA 92223
400482025
DODARO WANDA J
1650 PRIMROSE AVE
BEAUMONT CA 92223
Cherry Valley Pass Acres & Neighbors
P.O. Box 3257
Beaumont, CA 92223
BEAUMONT
-C A L I F O R N I A
Staff Report
TO: City Council
FROM: Doug Story, Community Services Director
DATE June 17, 2025
SUBJECT: Public Hearing to Consider Amending the City's Fee Schedule to Add Vendor Registration Fees for Special Events Hosted by the City Description Public Hearing to Consider a Resolution Amending the City's Fee Schedule to Add a Vendor Registration Fee for Special Events Hosted by the City.
Background and Analysis:
On April 1, 2025, staff provided an update to the Council on the 2025 season for Beaumont Nights at Towncenter. Subsequently, staff and Council discussed the possibility of establishing a fee or deposit for vendors to encourage participation and improve vendor attendance. During the discussion, the Council expressed their preference to establish a deposit -based registration fee that is fully or partially refundable, contingent on Vendor attendance.
Based on Council's direction, staff prepared a Resolution, provided as Attachment A, to establish a deposit -based registration fee for vendor participation in City events, including but not limited to: Beaumont Nights at Towncenter. As proposed, vendors participating in City events will be required to submit a daily registration fee based on their category. In an effort to ensure fair and reasonable pricing, vendors have been classified into three categories; Food and/or Alcohol Vendors, Other Vendors, and Beaumont Non -Profits. The proposed fees were developed to ensure the costs are affordable and the City can maintain a wide variety of vendors at Beaumont Nights and other City events.
The registration fee will be applied per day and per 10'x10' booth space, with the intent of encouraging consistent vendor participation. A portion of the registration fee is refundable under the following conditions:
• 50% of the registration fee will be refunded if the vendor participates in the scheduled event date(s).
• Vendors who cannot attend but provide at least 14 days' advance notice to staff will also be eligible to be refunded 50% of the registration fee.
Fee Breakdown
Vendor Type
Food or Alcohol
Vendor
All Other Vendors
Beaumont Non-
profits
Daily Registration
Fee
$50/day
$25/day
No cost
Refundable Amount (Upon Participation or
14 -Day Notice)
$25/day
$12.50/day
N/A
Failure to attend without advanced notice will result in the forfeiture of the full registration fee.
Public Notice Requirement
In compliance with Government Code Sections 66018 and 6062a, a notice of this public hearing was published in a newspaper of general circulation Two publications, with at least five days intervening between the dates of first and last publication on June 6 and 12, 2025.
Effective Date and Future Fee Updates
Staff is recommending an effective date of September 1, 2025. It is a recommended best practice that a comprehensive review of the City's fee schedule is performed every three to five years.
Fiscal Impact:
Although the primary purpose of the proposed registration fee is to encourage vendor participation and improve vendor attendance, the fee has the potential to generate a small amount of revenue to offset costs. With approximately 85 vendors per day at Beaumont Nights and an expected absence of 7.5%, an estimated 5% being Beaumont Non -Profits, and at least 20% being Food or Alcohol Vendors, the City would retain approximately $1,150 per day. This amount will help to recoup some of the costs for the required permits and equipment rentals.
The cost of preparing this staff report is estimated to be $580.
Recommended Action:
Hold a Public Hearing, and
Waive the full reading and Adopt by Title Only, "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Beaumont, California, Amending the City's Fee Schedule and Approving the
Addition of a New Deposit Based Registration Fee for Vendor Participation in Special Events Hosted by the City".
Attachments:
A. Resolution Amending the City's Fee Schedule
B. Exhibit "A" of Resolution
C. Exhibit "B" of Resolution
D. Notice of Public Hearing
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
BEAUMONT, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE CITY'S FEE
SCHEDULE AND APPROVING THE ADDITION OF A NEW
DEPOSIT BASED REGISTRATION FEE FOR VENDOR
PARTICIPATION IN SPECIAL EVENTS HOSTED BY THE
CITY OF BEAUMONT
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BEAUMONT HEREBY
RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The City Council of the City of Beaumont ("City Council") hereby finds, determines and declares that:
A. The City of Beaumont (City) hosts special events in which businesses, nonprofits, organizations and other entities or individuals ("Vendors") can register to participate; and
B. The City desires to implement a deposit -based registration fee for Vendors to participate in special events hosted by the City to discourage no-shows and improve attendance; and
C. Subject to availability, the City offers spaces to vendors that can vary in size based on the type of special event. Vendors that need additional space from the determined standard allocation for each event, may request multiple spaces; and D. The Vendor Registration Fee will apply per space and per day of event; and E. Vendors will be classified into three categories:
1. Food and/or Alcohol Vendors: Those that will prepare, sell or serve food and, or, alcohol at the event.
2. Other Vendors: Those that will not prepare, sell or serve food and, or, alcohol at the event. This includes, but is not limited to, craft vendors, merchandise sellers, informational booths, and commercial exhibitors. All Vendors that do not fall into Category 1 or 3 shall be considered "Other Vendors".
3. Beaumont Non -Profit Organizations: Organizations that are formally recognized as 501(C)(3) or other registered non-profit entities that are based in the 92223 -zip code. Verification of non-profit status is required, and; F. The registration fee per date will be determined on the vendor classification outlined above. Food or Alcohol Vendors will be subject to a fee of $50 per day and per space. Other Vendors will be subject to a fee of $25 per day and per space.
Beaumont Non -Profits will not be subject to a registration fee.
G. A portion of the registration fee is refundable under the following conditions:
1. The Vendor attends and participates in the scheduled event dates
2. The Vendor does not attend but provides at least 14 days' advance notice to the City of the expected absence.
H. Vendors that meet the criteria outlined in Section G of this Resolution shall receive a partial refund for the Vendor Registration Fee. A partial refund is defined as a 50% refund of the paid registration fee for each individual date.
I. For events that are part of a series, the City will issue partial refunds for the Registration Fee to Vendors once at the end of each series as determined by the City.
J. Staff will take attendance at the start of each event to determine Vendor eligibility for a partial refund of the Vendor Registration Fee; and K. Should an event be cancelled, the City will issue a full refund to all Vendors that have signed up and paid the registration fee for each specific date.
L. Chapter 3.32 of the Beaumont Municipal Code provides that the City may set fees to recoup costs reasonably borne by the City by means of adopting a resolution of the City Council, after compliance with the requirements of state law; and M. Government Code Section 66014 et al. allows local agencies to charge fees for various activities as long as those fees do not exceed the estimated reasonable costs of providing the service for which the fee is intended; and N. Pursuant to Government Code Sections 66014, 66015, 66017 and 66018 and the Beaumont Municipal Code, the specific fees to be charged for certain regulations, services and products must be adopted by resolution or ordinance, following notice and public hearing; and
O. The City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing on June 17, 2025, at which time the public was invited to make oral and written presentations as part of the regularly scheduled meeting prior to the adoption of this Resolution; and P. The City published notice of the public hearing as described above in accordance with Government Code Sections 66018 and 6062a (10 days in a newspaper regularly published once a week or oftener. Two publications, with at least five days intervening between the dates of first and last publication not counting such publication dates, are sufficient); and
Section 2. Vendor Registration Fee. The City Council hereby establishes the Vendor Registration Fee Vendors to participate in special events hosted by the City to discourage no-show and improve attendance.
Section 2. Update of User Fees and Charges. The City Council hereby updates the "City of Beaumont User Fee Schedule" as provided in Exhibit A. All other fees established shall remain in full force and effect.
Section 3. Environmental Exemption. The adoption of this Resolution is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA," Public Resources Code Sections 21000 et seq), because it approves and sets forth a procedure for determining fees for the purpose of meeting the operating expenses of City departments, as set forth in Public Resources Code Section 21080(b)(8)(A) and Section 15273 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines.
Section 4. Severability. If any section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this Resolution or any part hereof is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Resolution or any part thereof. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed each section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase hereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase be declared invalid or unconstitutional.
Section 5. Effective Date. This Resolution and all fees and rates herein shall continue and/or take effect on September 1, 2025.
ADOPTED this 17th day of June 2025.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
By:
Mike Lara, Mayor, City of Beaumont
ATTEST:
Nicole Wheelwright
Deputy City Clerk
By:
EXHIBIT "A"
Fee Schedule Addition - S-157 Vendor Registration Fee
[Attached]
EXHIBIT "B"
City of Beaumont Recreation Fee Schedule
[Attached]
REF a
FEE TITLE FEE AMOUNT
S-157
Vendor Registration Fee
Vendor Type:
Food And / Or Alcohol Vendors - $50 per day
per space
Beaumont Non -Profits - $0 / Day
All Other Vendors - $25 per day and per space
50% of the registration fee will be refunded if
the vendor participates in the scheduled event
date(s).
Vendors who cannot attend but provide at least
14 days' advance notice to staff will also be
eligible for a refund of 50% of the paid
registration fee.
Failure to attend without advanced notice will
result in the forfeiture of the full deposit.
REF # FEE TITLE FEE AMOUNT
LEISURE & CULTURAL SERVICES
S-155
FACILITY RENTALS
Albert A. Chatigny Sr. Community Recreation
Center
Community Meeting Room
Private - $50/hour Non -Profit - $40/hour
Deposit- $100
Dance/Fitness Room
Private - $75/hour Non -Profit - $60/hour
Deposit - $250
Kitchen
Private - $150/day Non -Profit - $150/day
Deposit - $250
Gymnasium
Private - $150/hour Non -Profit -
$120/hour
Deposit - $500
Building Attendant - $20/hour
Belmont Civic Center
Gymnasium
Private - $150/hour Non -Profit -
$120/hour
Deposit - $500
Building Attendant - $20/hour
Community Park Pavilions
Pavilion - $25/hour
Deposit - $100
Restroom Key- $50
S-156
BALLFIELD RENTALS
Sports Field Permit Fee (credited to total fee) -
$100 per permit
All Permits adjusted - $10 per transaction
Permit Cancellation Fee - $100
Group 2 (>80% residency)
Youth Group Field Use (Non -Tournament) - $5
per hour/per field
Youth Group Field Use (Tournament) - $10
per hour/per field
Group 3-5 (<80% residency)
Youth Group Field Use (Non -Tournament) -
$15 per hour/per field
Youth Group Field Use (Tournament) - $20
per hour/per field
Group 6 (non-resident teams)
Youth Group Field Use - $30 per hour/per
field
Adult Group Field Use - $30 per hour/per
field
Tournaments - $30 per hour/per field
Lights:
Sports Park Soccer Complex - $30 per
hour/per field
Rangle Park - $15 per hour
Stewart Park - $30 per hour
Key Deposit (Refundable) - $45 (includes 2
keys)
APPENDIX D - FIRE FEES
FIRE PLAN CHECK
FEE AMOUNT
FIRE INSPECTION
FEE AMOUNT
Minimum Inspection Fee
$150
Fire Fees For Sprinkler Permits (FSS)
New 13, 13R Fire Sprinkler System plan check (base fee) $525
New 13, 13R Fire Sprinkler System inspection (per sprinkler head) $7
New 13D Fire Sprinkler System plan check (base fee)
$225
New 13D Fire Sprinkler System inspection (per sprinkler head) (each separate plan type)
$7
APPENDIX D - FIRE FEES
FIRE PLAN CHECK
FEE AMOUNT
FIRE INSPECTION
FEE AMOUNT
TI 13, 13R Fire Sprinkler System plan check (base fee)
',375
TI 13, 13R Fire Sprinkler System inspection (per sprinkler head) $7
TI 13D Fire Sprinkler System plan check (base fee)
$187
TI 13D Fire Sprinkler System inspection (per sprinkler head) $7
Construction Reinspection Fee
$150
Alternate methods and materials (initial - 4 hrs. min.) $600
Alternate methods and materials Plan Review (addtl. hrs.) $150
Consultant Fire Plan Review
Actual consultant cost + 20% admin fee
Misc./Over the Counter/ Revisions
$150
3rd review and subsequent submittals (per hour)
$150
Expedited Plan Review (per hour)
$225
Overtime Inspection (per hour)
$225
Work without Permit (PENALTY)
$300
Fire Fees For Alarm Permits (FAL)
New Fire Alarm System plan check (base fee)
$525
New Fire Alarm System inspection (per initiating or notification device) $7
TI Fire Alarm System Plan Check (base fee)
$375
TI Fire Alarm System Inspection (per initiating or notification device) $7
Monitoring Only Plan Check
$150
Monitoring Only Inspection
$150
Construction Reinspection Fee
$150
Alternate methods and materials (initial - 4 hrs. min.) $600
Alternate methods and materials (addtl hrs.)
$150
Consultant Fire Plan Review
Actual consultant cost + 20% admin fee
Misc./Over the Counter/ Revisions
$150
3rd review and subsequent submittals (per hour)
$150
Expedited Plan Review (per hour)
$225
Overtime Inspection (per hour)
$225
Work without Permit (PENALTY)
$300
Fire Fees For Water System Permits (FTW)
Underground plan check (per connection)
$225
Underground inspection (per connection)
$300
Fire Pump plan check
$450
Fire Pump inspection
$375
Aboveground Temporary Tank plan check
$225
Aboveground Temporary Tank inspection
$225
Emergency Underground Repair plan check
$225
Emergency Underground Repair inspection
$450
Standpipes/Hose valves plan check
$225
Standpipes/Hose valves inspection
$300
Construction Reinspection Fee
$150
Alternate methods and materials (initial - 4 hrs. min.) $600
Alternate methods and materials (addtl. hrs.)
$150
Consultant Fire Plan Review
Actual consultant cost + 20% admin fee
Misc./Over the Counter/ Revisions
$150
3rd review and subsequent submittals (per hour)
$150
Expedited Plan Review (per hour)
$225
Overtime Inspection (per hour)
$225
Work without Permit (PENALTY)
$300
Fire Fees For Protection Systems Permits (FPS)
Special Extinguishing System plan check
$412
Special Extinguishing System inspection
$225
Hood and Duct Extinguishing System plan check (per system) $225
Hood and Duct Extinguishing System inspection (per system) $225
Smoke Control - Rationale Analysis and Plan Review
$1,050
Smoke Control System inspection
$900
Construction Reinspection Fee
$150
Alternate methods and materials (initial - 4 hrs. min.) $600
Alternate methods and materials (addtl. hrs.)
$150
Consultant Fire Plan Review
Actual consultant cost + 20% admin fee
Misc./Over the Counter/ Revisions
$150
3rd review and subsequent submittals (per hour)
$150
Expedited Review (per hour)
$225
Overtime Inspection (per hour)
$225
Work without Permit (PENALTY)
$300
Fire Fees For Other Systems Permits (FOS)
Special Equipment (Oven, Dust, etc) plan check
$300
Special Equipment (Oven, Dust, etc) inspection
$300
Battery Energy Sytems - Commercial plan check
$300
Battery Energy Sytems - Commercial inspection
$300
Battery Energy Sytems - Residential under 20 kWh plan check $150
Battery Energy Sytems - Residential under 20 kWh inspection $0
Battery Energy Sytems - Residential over 20 kWh plan check $150
Battery Energy Sytems - Residential over 20 kWh inspection $150
Refrigeration System < 500 lbs. plan check
$450
APPENDIX D - FIRE FEES
FIRE PLAN CHECK
FEE AMOUNT
FIRE INSPECTION
FEE AMOUNT
Refrigeration System 100 Chemicals plan check
$825
Haz-Mat Chem Class >100 Chemicals inspection
$525
Underground Storage Tanks plan check (per tank) Installation or Removal $338
Underground Storage Tanks inspection (per tank) Installation or Removal $112
Aboveground Storage Tanks plan check (per tank) Installation or Removal $338
Aboveground Storage Tanks inspection (per tank) Installation or Removal $112
Alterations to gas stations plan check (no tank alterations) $225
Alterations to gas stations inspection (no tank alterations) $150
Construction Reinspection Fee
$150
Alternate methods and materials (initial - 4 hrs, min.) $600
Alternate methods and materials Plan Review (addtl. hrs.) $150
Consultant Fire Plan Review
Actual consultant cost + 20% admin fee
Misc./Over the Counter/Revisions
$150
3rd review and subsequent submittals (per hour)
$150
Expedited Plan Review (per hour)
$225
Overtime Inspection (per hour)
$225
Work without Permit (PENALTY)
$300
Fire Fees For High Pile Storage Permits (FHP)
High Pile Storage 100,000 sq. ft plan check
$1,200
High Pile Storage > 100,000 sq. ft. Inspection
$1,200
Construction Reinspection Fee
$150
Alternate methods and materials (initial - 4 hrs. min.) $600
Alternate methods and materials Plan Review (addtl. hrs.) $150
Consultant Fire Plan Review
Actual consultant cost + 20% admin fee
APPENDIX D - FIRE FEES
FIRE PLAN CHECK
FEE AMOUNT
FIRE INSPECTION
FEE AMOUNT
Misc./Over the Counter/Revisions
',150
3rd review and subsequent submittals (per hour)
$150
Expedited Plan Review (per hour)
$225
Overtime Inspection (per hour)
$225
Work without Permit (PENALTY)
$300
Fire Fees For Hazard Abatement (FHA)
Hazard Reduction Inspection, per inspection
$150
Hazard Reduction Abatement Administrative Fee
$300
Hazard Reduction Abatement Cost Recovery
actual costs
Fire Fees For Tumbleweed Abatement (FTA)
Hazard Reduction Inspection, per inspection
$150
Hazard Reduction Abatement Administrative Fee
$300
Hazard Reduction Abatement Cost Recovery
actual costs
Fire Fees For Inspections (FIN)
Residential Care Facility 6 or less Pre -inspection
$150
Residential Day Care Facility 8-14 Fire Clearance
$150
Special Event WITH tents and/or canopies >400 sq. ft.
$300
$300
Special Event with NO tents and/or canopies
$150
$150
Carnivals and Fairs
$300
$300
Food Trucks
$150
$150
Firework Displays
$900
Complaints (not on fee schedule but is documented under this record type) $0
Fire Clearances (not on fee schedule but is documented under this record type for hospital, res. care facility 850 fire clearance, etc) $0
Hydrant/Control Valve Flow Test
$225
Fire Standby (per hour)
$150
Miscellaneous Inspection (uses 1 hour of the hourly rate fee) $150
Annual Fire Code Permits (CFC Operational Permits)
Aerosol Products Level 2 & 3
$75
Open Flame and/ or Candles in Assembly Occupancies
$75
Cellulose Nitrate
$75
Combustible Fibers
$150
Combustible Materials
$75
Compressed Gases
$150
Cryogenic Fluids
$150
Dispensing of Flammable/Combustible liquids into a vehicle $150
Dry Cleaning Plants 1-2 units
$75
Dry Cleaning Plants > 2 units
$225
Combustible Dust Producing & Operations
$150
Covered and Uncovered Ma1I Buildings
$225
Explosives
$150
Flammable/Combustible Liquids Inside ≥60 Gal.
$150
Flammable/Combustible Liquids Inside 100,000 sq. ft
$600
Industrial Ovens/Drying
$150
Liquefied Petroleum Gases
$75
Liquid or Gas Filled Vehicles in Assemblies
$150
Miscellaneous Combustible Storage
$150
Motor Vehicle Repair
$150
Storage of Tires
$150
Places of Assembly
$150
Pyrotechnical Special Effects
$600
Spray Booths/ Dipping Operations
$150
Welding and Cutting
$75
Special Amusement Buildings
$225
Hazardous Production Materials
$150
Lumber yards and woodworking plants
$300
Magnesium
$75
Refrigeration Equipment <500 lbs.
$150
Refrigeration Equipment ≥500 lbs.
$300
Additive Manufacturing (3D Printing)
$150
Energy Storage Systems
$300
Mobile Fueling of Hydrogen -Fueled Vehicles
$150
Motor Fuel -Dispensing Facilities
$150
Lithium Batteries
$150
Fire Fees For Business Annuals (Fire # FBP)
A-1 occupancies: Assembly uses, usually with fixed seating, intended for the production and viewing of performing arts or motion pictures <20,000 sq. ft. $225
APPENDIX D - FIRE FEES
FIRE PLAN CHECK
FEE AMOUNT
FIRE INSPECTION
FEE AMOUNT
A-1 occupancies: Assembly uses, usually with fixed seating, intended for the production and viewing of performing arts or motion pictures ≥20,000 sq. ft. $450
A-2 occupancies: Assembly uses intended for food and/or drink consumption with occupant load of 50-150
$150
A-2 occupancies: Assembly uses intended for food and/or drink consumptionwith occupant load or more than 151
$225
A-3 occupancies: Assembly uses intended for worship, recreation or amusement and other assembly occupancies not classified as A -1,A -2,A-4, and A-5 occupancies 350,000 sq. ft
$900
H or L Occupancy
$450
2nd Re -Inspection Penalty (Penalty of $150 + reinspection fee $150 = $300) $300
3rd + Re -inspection Penalty (Penalty of $250 + reinspection fee $150 = $400) $400
Work without Permit (PENALTY)
$300
Fire Fees For Multi Family Annuals (Fire # FMF)
R-1 Occupancy (i.e. hotels, motels) 100 units
$900
R-2 Occupancy (i.e. Res Permanent 3+) per unit
$37
Care Facility Commercial 0-50 State Licensed
$300
Care Facility Commercial 51-99 State Licensed
$375
Care Facility Commercial 100-150 State Licensed
$450
Care Facility Commercial ≥ 151 State Licensed
$600
2nd Re -Inspection Penalty (Penalty of $150 + reinspection fee $150 = $300) $300
3rd + Re -inspection Penalty (Penalty of $250 + reinspection fee $150 = $400) $400
Work without Permit (PENALTY)
$300
Fire Fees For State Mandates Annuals (Fire # FSM) IF
E Occupancy (Schools) 10,000 sq. ft.
Hospitals 10,000 S.F.
Skilled Nursing 10,000 S.F.
Jail 10,000 S.F.
High -Rise 75' or more
$600
$900
Day Care Facilities Commercial 0-50
$150
Day Care Facilities Commercial 51-100
$225
Day Care Facilities Commercial 101-150
$300
Day Care Facilities Commercial >150
$375
2nd Re -Inspection Penalty (Penalty of $150 + reinspection fee $150 = $300) $300
3rd + Re -inspection Penalty (Penalty of $250 + reinspection fee $150 = $400) $400
Work without Permit (PENALTY)
$300
Miscellaneous Fire Fees
Inspection (per hour)
150
Plan Review (per hour)
$150
Consultant Fire Plan Review
Actual consultant cost + 20% admin fee
Fire Fees For Items That No Record Is Created
False Alarm - Residential
$0
False Alarm - Commercial
$300
Fire Fees That Will Be In Planning Records
Annexation Process and Environmental Review, Deposit
$150
Conditional Use Permit
$450
APPENDIX D - FIRE FEES
FIRE PLAN CHECK
FEE AMOUNT
FIRE INSPECTION
FEE AMOUNT
Conditional Use Permit: Admin & Existing Structure
300
Conditional Use Permit: Amended CUP/Substantial Conformance $150
Custom Home Review
$300
Development Agreement, Deposit
Actual Costs
Development Agreement Amendment, Deposit
Actual Costs
Environmental Review
EIR Report Preparation, Deposit
Actual Costs
Extension of Time
Actual Costs
General Plan Amendment, Deposit
Actual Costs
Phasing Map
$150
Plot Plan
With hearing
$450
Without hearing (notice)
$450
Without hearing (no notice)
$450
Amended plot plan/substantial conformance
$150
Pre -application Review
$450
Specific Plan, Deposit
Actual Costs
Specific Plan Amendment, Deposit
Actual Costs
Special Event Permit - Minor
$150
Special event Permit - Major
$300
Tentative Parcel Map
Residential
$450
Commercial
$450
Tentative Tract or Condo Map
$450
Tentative Tract or Parcel Map Revised
$450
Fire Fees That Will Be In Land Development Records
Precise Grading plan review, per sheet
$225
Water/Sewer plan review, per sheet
$225
4th+ submittal ( 1/2 hour of hourly rate)
$75
Fire Fees For New Const. & Ti'S (BFC & BRC)
Buildings for all Commercial Uses - (The enclosure for all newly constructed or added space for non-residential occupancies classified as CBC Group A, B, E, F, I, M, S, or other commercial occupancies not specifically addressed elsewhere in this Fee Schedule where the interior is completed and occupiable (same fees as shell buildings)
0 - 1999 sq. ft
$150
$150
2,000 - 4,999 sq. ft
$188
$188
5,000 - 9,999 sq. ft.
$225
$225
10,000 - 24,999 sq. ft
$300
$300
25,000 - 49,999 sq. ft
$375
$375
50,000 or > to be charged by base fee plus a sq. ft. multiplier $450 + $9 per 1,000 SF
$450 + $9 per 1,000 SF
Residential and Multifamily Residential Uses - (All newly constructed or added space for residential occupancies classified as CBC Group R, or other residential occupancies not specifically addressed elsewhere in this Fee Schedule)
0 - 1999 sq. ft
$150
$150
2,000 - 4,999 sq. ft.
$188
$188
5,000 - 9,999 sq. ft
$225
$225
10,000 - 24,999 sq. ft
$300
$300
25,000 - 49,999 sq. ft
$375
$375
50,000 or > to be charged by base fee plus a sq. ft. multiplier $450 + $9 per 1,000 SF
$450 + $9 per 1,000 SF
Hazardous Use - (AII newly constructed or added space for hazardous use occupancies classified as CBC Group H.
0 - 1999 sq. ft
$188
$188
2,000 - 4,999 sq. ft
$300
$300
5,000 - 9,999 sq. ft.
$413
$413
10,000 - 24,999 sq. ft
$525
$525
25,000 - 49,999 sq. ft
$638
$638
50,000 or > to be charged by base fee plus a sq. ft. multiplier $750 + $15 per 1,000 SF
$750 + $15 per 1,000 SF
Shell Buildings for all Commercial Uses - (The enclosure for all newly constructed or added space for non-residential occupancies classified as CBC Group A, B, E, F, I, M, S, or other commercial occupancies not specifically addressed elsewhere in this Fee Schedule where the interior is not completed or occupiable)
0 - 1999 sq. ft
$150
$150
2,000 - 4,999 sq. ft.
$188
$188
5,000 - 9,999 sq. ft.
$225
$225
10,000 - 24,999 sq. ft
$300
$300
25,000 - 49,999 sq. ft
$375
$375
50,000 or > to be charged by base fee plus a sq. ft. multiplier $450 + $9 per 1,000 SF
$450 + $9 per 1,000 SF
Tenant Improvement - (Remodeled space for non-residential occupancies classified as CBC Group A, B, E, F, I, M, R, S, or other commercial occupancies not specifically addressed elsewhere.)
0 - 1999 sq. ft
$150
$150
APPENDIX D - FIRE FEES
FIRE PLAN CHECK
FEE AMOUNT
FIRE INSPECTION
FEE AMOUNT
2,000 - 4,999 sq. ft.
'.188
188
5,000 - 9,999 sq. ft.
$225
$225
10,000 - 24,999 sq. ft
$300
$300
25,000 - 49,999 sq. ft
$375
$375
50,000 or > to be charged by base fee plus a sq. ft. multiplier $450 + $9 per 1,000 SF
$450 + $9 per 1,000 SF
Tenant Improvement - Hazardous Use (Remodeled space for non- residential occupancies classified as CBC Group H.
0 - 1999 sq. ft
$150
$150
2,000 - 4,999 sq. ft.
$225
$225
5,000 - 9,999 sq. ft.
$338
$338
10,000 - 24,999 sq. ft
$450
$450
25,000 - 49,999 sq. ft.
$563
$563
50,000 or > to be charged by base fee plus a sq. ft. multiplier $675 + $13.50 per 1,000 SF
$675 + $13.50 per 1,000 SF
Solar / Photovoltaic (BON / BFR / BRC)
Solar Photovoltaic Systems (Commercial)
$300
$150
Cell Sites
Cell Site New
$150
$150
Cell Site Modification
$75
$150
Additional Fire Fees for BFC / BFR / BON
Construction Trailer
$75
$150
Model Home Complex/Sales Office Conversion
$150
$150
Storage Racks - first 500 LF
$150
$150
Storage Racks - each additional 500 LF
$150
$150
Swimming Pool - Multi-Family/Commercial
$150
$150
Commercail EV Charging Station
$150
$150
Consultant Fire Plan Review
Actual consultant cost + 20% admin fee
Misc./Over the Counter/ Revisions
$150
Misc./Over the Counter/ Revisions option 2
$150
3rd review and subsequent submittals (per hour)
$150
Expedited / Overtime Plan Review (per hour)
$225
Expedited / Overtime Inspection (per hour)
$225
THE PRESS -ENTERPRISE
KEEP YOUR EYES ON TI Ih:'PRISE
pe.com
3512 14 Street
Riverside, California 92501
(951) 368-9229
[email protected]
City of Beaumont
550 E. 6th Street
Beaumont, California 92223
Account Number:
Ad Order Number:
Customer's Reference/PO Number:
Publication:
Publication Dates:
Total Amount:
Payment Amount:
Amount Due:
Notice ID:
Invoice Text:
5209298
0011739493
The Press -Enterprise
06/06/2025 and 06/12/2025
$411.34
$0.00
$411.34
H e i pSQCvkKs36 M 11 H m Kc
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the City of Beaumont will conduct a public hearing to consider the matter described below. The City of Beaumont's public hearing will be held at 6:00 p.m. on Tuesday, June 17, 2025, at 550 East Sixth Street, Beaumont, California. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BEAUMONT
ADOPTING THE CITY'S FEE SCHEDULE AMD APPROVING THE ADDITION OF A
NEW DEPOSIT BASED REGISTRATION FEE FOR VENDOR PARTICIPATION IN BEAUMONT NIGHTS AT TOWNCENTER This meeting will be open to the public and will be recorded for live streaming on the City's official YouTube webpage . Please use the following link during the meeting for live stream access:
BeaumontCa.gov/Livestream Public comments will be accepted using the following options: 1. Emailed comments will be read aloud during the corresponding item of the meeting. Please submit your comments to [email protected] 2. In person public comments. 3. Call -in comments using a designated public comment phone line (951) 922-4845. City Council will conduct a public hearing to receive testimony and comments from all interested persons. Public comments shall not exceed three minutes unless otherwise authorized by City Council. Comments can be submitted any time prior to the meeting as well as during the meeting until the end of the corresponding item. Dated: June 3, 2025
Vendor Registration Fees - Page 1 of 1
THE PRESS -ENTERPRISE
KEEP YOUR EYES ON TI ❑E PIVISR
The Press -Enterprise
3512 14 Street
Riverside, California 92501
(951) 368-9229
City of Beaumont
550 E. 6th Street
Beaumont, California 92223
Publication: The Press -Enterprise
PROOF OF PUBLICATION OF
Ad Desc: 0011739493
FILE NO. 0011739493
PROOF OF PUBLICATION
I am a citizen of the United States. I
am over the age of eighteen years and
not party to or interested in the above -
entitled matter. I am an authorized
representative of THE PRESS -
ENTERPRISE, a newspaper of general
circulation, printed and published daily
in the County of Riverside, and which
newspaper has been adjudicated a
newspaper of general circulation by the
Superior Court of the County of
Riverside, State of California, under
date of April 25, 1952, Case Number
54446, under date of March 29, 1957,
Case Number 65673, under date of
August 25, 1995, Case Number
267864, and under date of September
16, 2013, Case Number RIC 1309013;
that the notice, of which the annexed is
a printed copy, has been published in
said newspaper in accordance with the
instructions of the person(s) requesting
publication, and not in any supplement
thereof on the following dates, to wit:
06/06/2025, 0611212025
I certify (or declare) under the penalty
of perjury that the foregoing is true and
correct.
Date: June 12, 2025.
At: Riverside, California
Signature
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the City of Beaumont will conduct cm public hearing to consider the matter described below. The City of Beaumont's public hearing will be held at 6:00 p.m. on Tuesday, June 17, 2025, at 550 East Sixth Street, Beaumont, California.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BEAUMONT
ADOPTING THE CITY'S FEE SCHEDULE AMD APPROVING THE
ADDITION OF A NEW DEPOSIT BASED REGISTRATION FEE FOR
VENDOR PARTICIPATION IN BEAUMONT NIGHTS AT TOWNCENTER
This meeting will be open to the public and will be recorded for live streaming on the City's official YouTube webpage . Please use the following link during the meeting for live stream access:
BeaumontCa.gov/Livestream
Public comments will be accepted using the following options:
1. Emalled comments will be react aloud during the corresponding Item of the meeting. Please submit your comments to N1coleW(n) BecrumontCa.gov
2. In person public comments.
3. Call-ln comments using a designated public comment phone line (951) 922-4845.
City Council will conduct a public hearing to receive testimony and comments from all Interested persons. Public comments shall not exceed three minutes unless otherwise authorized by City Council.
Comments can be submitted any time prior to the meeting as well as during the meeting until the end of the corresponding ltern.
Dated: June 3, 2025
The Press -Enterprise
Published: 6/6, 6/12/25
Vendor Registration Fees - Page 1 of 1
BEAUMONT
-C A L I F O R N I A
Staff Report
TO: City Council
FROM: Jennifer Ustation, Finance Director
DATE June 17, 2025
SUBJECT: Annual Resolution to Place the Levy of Special Taxes for Community Facilities Districts on the Fiscal Year 2025-26 Riverside County Tax Roll Description The approval of this item will allow the Riverside County Auditor -Controller to levy and collect special taxes for the City's Community Facilities Districts for the 2025-2026 fiscal year.
Background and Analysis:
Beaumont is required to direct the Riverside County Auditor -Controller to place its levy of special taxes for the Community Facilities Districts (CFDs) on the County tax roll. For Fiscal Year (FY) 2025-26, this must occur prior to August 15, 2025. The resolutions before the Council are required to complete the annual enrollment and collection of the City's Community Facilities District ("CFD") special taxes needed to meet all financial and contractual obligations.
City staff has prepared the Fiscal Year 2025-26 Special Levy for the City's various improvement areas ("IA") of CFD No. 93-1, CFD Nos. 2016-1, 2016-2, 2016-3, 2016-4, 2018-1, 2019-1, 2021-1, and 2023-1. The calculations incorporate various assumptions as applicable for each IA or CFD, including:
1. The expected annual debt service costs;
2. The expected costs of providing services such as the landscaping, maintenance, and lighting of City -owned parks, parkways, streets, roads, and open space;
3. The expected costs of providing public safety services such as police, fire, and ambulance and paramedic services;
4. The expected administrative costs; and
5. The collection of funds for future facilities.
Over the past several years, the City has implemented measures to reduce special tax rates for all applicable IAs of CFD No. 93-1 and recently formed CFDs for which the final series of bonds has been issued. The City's developing CFDs, for which the final series of bonds has not been issued, are not yet eligible for a reduction. Historically, the reduction in special tax rates has been accomplished through two forms: i) bond
refinancing, and ii) bond issuances to fully bond CFDs/IAs. For Fiscal Year 2025-26, the City and finance team have reviewed available funds for services and are recommending enrollment of an amount that is less than the FY 2025-26 Maximum Special Tax for Services and Public Safety. Cumulatively, this leads to a projected savings of approximately $670,010 across 33 IAs and 8 CFDs.
Approval of the attached resolutions establishes the levy of all IAs/CFDs listed in Attachment F and authorizes the County of Riverside to place the levy upon the property tax roll for Fiscal Year 2025-26. Detailed parcel calculations will be provided to the County of Riverside to levy and collect such special taxes on behalf of the City.
The aggregate Fiscal Year 2025-26 projected CFD levy will show an increase over FY 2024-25, primarily as a result of building permits being issued and increased development within the City. In some cases, certain IAs/CFDs have seen an increase in their levies because the IA was not eligible for reduction, and the special tax escalated annually per the requirements of the RMA and/or debt service requirements for bonds outstanding. Staff will continue to make all efforts possible to continue to reduce the special tax rates in future years for all eligible IAs/CFDs.
Multiple resolutions are provided for individual consideration. This will allow individual City Council members to recuse themselves for consideration of those IAs/CFDs for which they own property.
Fiscal Impact:
The fiscal impact on the City's general fund is indirect, as the administration and maintenance portions of assessments collected are the funding source for the administration of the CFD processes and maintenance of the various applicable geographic regions.
The estimated cost to prepare this report is $320.
Recommended Action:
Waive the full reading and adopt by title only "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Beaumont, California, Levying the Special Tax in Community Facilities Districts No. 93-1, 2016-1, 2016-2, 2016-3, 2016-4, 2018-1, 2019-1, 2021-1, and 2023-1 and Directing the County Auditor to Collect the Same on the Tax Rolls (93-1, 2016-1, 2016- 2, 2016-3, 2016-4, 2018-1, 2019-1, 2021-1, and 2023-1)." Waive the full reading and adopt by title only "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Beaumont, California, Levying the Special Tax in Community Facilities Districts
No. 93-1 (IA 18) and Directing the County Auditor to Collect the Same on the Tax Rolls (IA 18)"
Waive the full reading and adopt by title only "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Beaumont, California, Levying the Special Tax in Community Facilities Districts No. 93-1 (IA 14 and 14B) and Directing the County Auditor to Collect the Same on the Tax Rolls (IA 14 and 14B)."
Waive the full reading and adopt by title only "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Beaumont, California, Levying the Special Tax in Community Facilities Districts No. 93-1 (IA 9) and Directing the County Auditor to Collect the Same on the Tax Rolls (IA 9)."
Waive the full reading and adopt by title only "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Beaumont, California, Levying the Special Tax in Community Facilities Districts No. 93-1 (IA 8E) and Directing the County Auditor to Collect the Same on the Tax Rolls (IA 8E)."
Attachments:
A. Resolution for Annual Levy 2025 (Balance)
B. Resolution for Annual Levy 2025 (Fenn recusal — IAs 14, 14B) C. Resolution for Annual Levy 2025 (Martinez recusal — IA 9) D. Resolution for Annual Levy 2025 (Voigt recusal — IA 8E) E. Resolution for Annual Levy 2025 (White recusal — IA 18) F. Summary of CFD Special Tax Enrollment
G. PowerPoint Presentation
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
BEAUMONT, CALIFORNIA, LEVYING THE SPECIAL TAX IN
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICTS NO. 93-1, 2016-1, 2016-2, 2016-3, 2016-4, 2018-1, 2019-1, 2021-1 & 2023-1 AND DIRECTING THE COUNTY
AUDITOR TO COLLECT THE SAME ON THE TAX ROLLS
(93-1, 2016-1, 2016-2, 2016-3, 2016-4, 2018-1, 2019-1, 2021-1 & 2023-1) WHEREAS, The City Council (the "City Council") of the City of Beaumont is the legislative body of Community Facilities Districts No. 93-1, 2 016 -1, 2 016 - 2, 2016-3, 2016-4, 2018-1, 2019-1, 2021-1 & 2023-1 (collectively or individually 'District"), which District was established pursuant to the provisions of the Mello -Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, as amended, being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the G overnment Code of the State of California (the "Act"); and
WHEREAS, on June 29, 1993 the City Council adopted Resolution 1993- 13 establishing the District, including separate improvement areas therein (each an Improvement Area, and collectively, the 'Improvement Area") and providing for the Special Tax within each such Improvement Area; a n d WHEREAS, on August 11, 1993 the City Council enacted Ordinance No. 721 in accordance with Section 53340 of the Act authorizing the levy of the Special Tax on the property located within Improvement Areas No's. 1 thru 7 (including 6A and 6B) and 10 thru 12 of the District. (Fund Code 68-2109 thru 68-2130); and WHEREAS, on January 18, 2005 the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 873 in accordance with Section 53340 of the Act authorizing the levy of Special Tax on the property located within Improvement Area 6A1. (Fund Code 68-2088 & 68-2183); and
WHEREAS, on May 3, 2005 the City Council adopted Ordinance No's. 882 in accordance with Section 53340 of the Act authorizing the levy of Special Tax on the property located within Improvement Area 7B. (Fund Code 68-2139 & 68- 2095); and WHEREAS, on May 3, 2005 the City Council adopted Ordinance No's. 883 in accordance with Section 53340 of the Act authorizing the levy of Special Tax on the property located within Improvement Area 7C. (Fund Code 68-2094 & 68- 2146); and WHEREAS, on May 3, 2005 the City Council adopted Ordinance No's. 884 in accordance with Section 53340 of the Act authorizing the levy of Special Tax on the property located within Improvement Area 7D. (Fund Code 68-2179 & 68- 2180); and WHEREAS, on December 16, 2014, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 1053 in accordance with Section 53340 of the Act authorizing the levy of Special Tax on the property located within Improvement Area 7A1. (Fund Code 68-1811 & 68-1812); and
WHEREAS, on February 19, 2002 the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 825 in accordance with Section 53340 of the Act authorizing the levy of Special Tax on the property located within Improvement Area No. 8. (Fund Code 68-2127 & 68- 2129); and
WHEREAS, on November 2, 2004 the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 871 in accordance with Section 53340 of the Act authorizing the levy of Special Tax on the property located within Improvement Area 8A. (Fund Code 68-2136 & 68-2101); and WHEREAS, on June 6, 2006 the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 896 in accordance with Section 53340 of the Act authorizing the levy of Special Tax on the property located within Improvement Area 8B. (Fund Code 68-2140 & 68-2102); and WHEREAS, on June 6, 2006 the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 897 in accordance with Section 53340 of the Act authorizing the levy of Special Tax on the property located within Improvement Area 8C. (Fund Code 68-2141 & 68-2149); and WHEREAS, on May 1, 2007 the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 913 amending Ordinance 8 9 7 in accordance with Section 53340 of the Act authorizing the levy of Special Tax on the property located within Improvement Area 8C. (Fund Code 68-2141 & 68-2149); and
WHEREAS, on August 21, 2007, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 915 in accordance with Section 53340 of the Act authorizing the levy of Special Tax on the property located within Improvement Area 8D. (Fund Code 68-2147 & 68-2150); and
WHEREAS, on July 21, 2015 the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 10 5 7 in accordance with Section 53340 of the Act authorizing the levy of Special Tax on the property located within Improvement Area 8F. (Fund Code 68-2162 & 68-2163); and WHEREAS, on May 22, 1995 the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 752 in accordance with Section 53340 of the Act authorizing the levy of Special Tax on the property located within Improvement Area No. 13. (Fund Code 68-2120); and WHEREAS, on November 5, 2002, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 836 in accordance with Section 53340 of the Act authorizing the levy of Special Tax on the property located within Improvement Area 14A. (Fund Code 68-2181); and WHEREAS, on May 21, 2002 the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 830 in accordance with Section 53340 of the Act authorizing the levy of the Special Tax on the property located within Improvement Area No. 15. (Fund Code 68-2128); and WHEREAS, on July 20, 2004 the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 868 in accordance with Section 53340 of the Act authorizing the levy of Special Tax on the property located within Improvement Area 16. (Fund Code 60-2093 & 68-2134); and WHEREAS, on November 18, 2004 the City Council adopted Ordinance No.
851 in accordance with Section 53340 of the Act authorizing the levy of Special Tax on the property located within Improvement Area 17A (Fund Code 68-2090 & 68- 2131); and
WHEREAS, on December 5, 2006 the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 905 in accordance with Section 53340 of the Act authorizing the levy of Special Tax on the property located within Improvement Area 1711 (Fund Code 68-2089 & 68- 2142); and
WHEREAS, on August 7, 2012, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 1022 in accordance with Section 53340 of the Act authorizing the levy of Special Tax on the property located within Improvement Area 17C. (Fund Code 68-2098 & 68-2144); and
WHEREAS, on July 21, 2015, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 1058 in accordance with Section 53340 of the Act authorizing the levy of Special Tax on the property located within Improvement Area 17D. (Fund Code 68-0531 & 68-0532); and WHEREAS, on December 7, 2004 the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 872 in accordance with Section 53340 of the Act authorizing the levy of Special Tax on the property located within Improvement Area 19A. (Fund Code 68-2096 & 68-2135); and WHEREAS, on December 7, 2004 the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 872 in accordance with Section 53340 of the Act authorizing the levy of Special Tax on the property located within Improvement Area 19C. (Fund Code 68-2099 & 68-2137); and WHEREAS, on December 20, 2005 the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 889 in accordance with Section 53340 of the Act authorizing the levy of Special Tax on the property located within Improvement Area 20. (Fund Code 68-2091 & 68-2143); and WHEREAS, on August 15, 2006 the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 899 in accordance with Section 53340 of the Act authorizing the levy of Special Tax on the property located within Improvement Area 23. (Fund Code 68-2138); and WHEREAS, on June 7, 2016, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 1073 in accordance with Section 53340 of the Act authorizing the levy of Special Tax on the property located within CFD 2016-1 (Fund Code 68-1818 & 68-1819); and WHEREAS, on February 21, 2017, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 1081 in accordance with Section 53340 of the Act authorizing the levy of Special Tax on the property located within CFD 2 016-2 (Fund Code 68-0043, 68-0045 & 68-0046); and WHEREAS, on February 21, 2017, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 1082 in accordance with Section 53340 of the Act authorizing the levy of Special Tax on the property located within CFD 2 016-3 (Fund Code 68-0204, 68-0205 & 68-0206); and WHEREAS, on February 21, 2017, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 1083 in accordance with Section 53340 of the Act authorizing the levy of Special Tax on the property located within CFD 2 016-4 (Fund Code 68-0047, 68-0048 & 68-0049).