Agenda packet — Bellflower City Council, May 13, 2024 (part 4 of 4)

EXHIBIT A

INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS
[MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH PROJECT PROPOSAL]
To be awarded this contract, the successful bidder must procure and maintain the following types of insurance with coverage limits complying, at a minimum. with the limits set forth below:

Type of Insurance Limits
Commercial general liability
Business automobile liability
Workers compensation
$2.000,000
$1,000,000
Statutory requirement
Commercial general liability insurance must meet or exceed the requirements of the most recent ISO-CGL Form Number. The amount of insurance set forth above must be a combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury, and property damage for the policy coverage. Liability policies must be endorsed to name the City. its officials. and employees as "additional insureds" under said insurance coverage and to state that such insurance will be deemed "primary" such that any other insurance that may be carried by the City will be excess thereto. Such insurance must be on an "occurrence," not a "claims made." basis and will not be cancelable or subject to reduction except upon thirty (30) days prior written notice to the City.

Professional liability coverage must be on an "occurrence basis" if such coverage is available, or on a "claims made" basis if not available. When coverage is provided on a "claims made basis," the Consultant must continue to maintain the insurance in effect for a period of three (3) years after this Agreement expires or is terminated ("extended insurance"). Such extended insurance must have the same coverage and limits as the policy that was in effect during the term of this Agreement, and cover the Consultant for all claims made by the City arising out of any errors or omissions of the Consultant, or its officers. employees or agents during the time this Agreement was in effect.

Automobile coverage must be written on ISO Business Auto Coverage Form CA 00 01 06 92, including symbol 1 (Any Auto).

The Consultant must furnish to the City duly authenticated Certificates of Insurance evidencing maintenance of the insurance required under this Agreement, endorsements as required herein, and such other evidence of insurance or copies of policies as may be reasonably required by the City from time to time. Insurance must be placed with admitted insurers with a current A.M. Best Company Rating equivalent to at least a Rating of "A:VII." Certificate(s) must reflect that the insurer will provide thirty (30) day notice of any cancellation of coverage
Family Owned and Operated Since 1948 8 Reath Management n MINOS bta Protection
-60-
24 C]corodata
Exhibit A: Insurance Requirements — Continued
The Consultant will require its insurer to modify such certificates to delete any exculpatory wording stating that failure of the insurer to mail written notice of cancellation imposes no obligation, and to delete the word "endeavor'. with regard to any notice provisions
By signing this form, the bidder certifies that it has read, understands. and will comply with these insurance requirements if it is selected as the City's consultant. Failure to provide this form may render the bidder's proposal "nonresponsive." 3/7/2024 ny
Date Bidd
Family Owned and Operated Since 1948 Records Management 0 Shredding imaging
0 Data Protection 25
-61-

City of Bellflower
RFP No, CC -2024-01: Records Storage, Retrieval, Scanning, and Destruction Services

Page 15 of 19 ends

EXHIBIT B - SIGNATURE VERIFICATION FORM
Thank you for doing business with the City of Bellflower. Please note that the City requires verification that the person executing a contract has signature authority.

Signature requirements for contracts vary depending on whether a vendor conducts business in the capacity of a corporation, general partnership, limited partnership, or as an individual. When the contract is with a corporation, California Corporations Code § 313 requires the contract to be signed by: (a) one officer from the corporation's "operational group" consisting of the chairman of the board, the president, or any vice president and (b) one officer from the corporation's "financial group" consisting of the secretary, or assistant secretary, or the chief financial officer or any assistant treasurer.

Alternatively, the board of directors for the corporation can delegate signature authority to a particular individual or individuals. This is generally memorialized in a form of a resolution adopted by the board of directors. When the contract is with a consultant conducting business as a general partnership or limited partnership, the contract should be signed by at least one general partner having authority to enter into the contract on behalf of the partnership. When the contract is with an individual, that individual must sign the contract.

To ensure that the City's contracts are valid, this Signature Verification Form must be completed by vendors/contractors/consultants providing services to the City of Bellflower.

By completing this form, the person listed below has the authority to sign all legal binding agreements with the City of Bellflower on behalf of the company/organization listed below. If a corporation, attach a copy of the document demonstrating signature authority to this form.

The City of Bellflower greatly appreciates your cooperation.

Date:
3/7/2024
Type of Company/Organization: S Corp
Company/Organization Name:

Name:

Title:

Signature:

Corodata Records Management, Inc.

Chris Albright
Director of. Finance and Financial Operations
Please send the completed form to the following address:

City of Bellflower
City Clerk's Office
16600 Civic Center Drive
Bellflower, CA 90706
cclerk(a bellflower.orq
-62-

City of Bellflower
RFP No. CC -2024-01: Records Storage, Retrieval, Scanning, and Destruction Services

Page 15 of 19 ends

Signature requirements for contracts vary depending on whether a vendor conducts business in the capacity of a corporation, general partnership, limited partnership, or as an individual. When the contract is with a corporation, California Corporations Code § 313 requires the contract to be signed by: (a) one officer from the corporation's "operational group" consisting of the chairman of the board, the president, or any vice president; and (b) one officer from the corporation's "financial group" consisting of the secretary, or assistant secretary, or the chief financial officer or any assistant treasurer.

To ensure that the City's contracts are valid, this Signature Verification Form must be completed by vendors/contractors/consultants providing services to the City of Bellflower.

The City of Bellflower greatly appreciates your cooperation.

Date -
3/7/2024
Type of Company/Organization: S Corp
Company/Organization Name:

Name:

Title:

Signature:

Corodata Records Management, Inc.

Ken Stender
Vice President, General Manager
Please send the completed form to the following address:

City of Bellflower
City Clerk's Office
16600 Civic Center Drive
Bellflower, CA 90706
cclerk( belIflower.orq

morodata
Media Storage, Inc.

Quote
City of Bellflower
4/16/2024
Base Admin/Facility/Technology Fee

60.00 /month
Storage Rates
Tape, CD, Thumb Drive, etc (minimum of 20 tapes)
Hard Drive (minimum of 20 hard drives)
Regular Storage Media Container (up to 1.0 cu ft. )
Large Storage Media Container (1.1 to 2.0 cu ft.)
File Storage Container (1.2 cubic foot)

0.50 ea/month

1.00 ea/month

12.00 ea/month

24.00 ea/month

10.00 ea/month
Tape Transportation Containers
Tape Transportation Container - (must have for slotted tapes/hd) 12.00 ea/month Library Services
Tape Movement (pull or slot)
Hard Drive Movement (pull or slot)
Rotation/Storage Container Movement (pull or re -shelve container) Transport Container Handling
Destroy Hard Drive ($50.00 minimum)
Destroy Tape ($50.00 minimum)
Trip Charges
Scheduled or Next Day
4 Hour Rush or Service Window
2 Hour Rush or Service Window
Emergency Service (after hours or immediate dispatch)
4 Hour Service Window for Weekly Service
4 Hour Service Window for Daily Service
Software & Other Options
Tapetrack Lite
Tapetrack Tapemaster
Tapetrack Synchronization
Account Set up Fee
Library Projects
Energy Charge

0.54 /each

3.00 /each

3.75 /each

8.00 /each

0.82 /each

33.75 /trip

81.00 /trip
118.00 /trip
344.00 /trip

94.00 /month
368.00 /month

0.00 /month

79.00 /month

79.00 /month
150.00 /one time

78.00 /hour
Estimated Monthly Charge
Note: Additional services for which a specific rate is not listed will be offered at a negotiated rate. Corodata reserves the right to apply an energy charge to each invoice.

Q6n
Qty
Amount
1 $ 60.00
6 $ 72.00
4 $ 15.00
4 $ 15.00
2 $ 67.50
6% $ 13.77
$ 243.27
-64-

c' p BE LLF(p wkk
staff
CRG k'rNG TOGETN�� report
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
ATTENTION: Ryan Smoot, City Manager
FROM: Jim DellaLonga, Director of Economic Development
SUBJECT: Consideration and possible action to approve and authorize the City Manager to execute a Master Right of Way Agreement (Agreement File No. 1040), in a form approved by the City Attorney, with Tradewinds Networks Inc., for the design, installation and deployment of a Citywide Wireless Internet Network.

DATE: May 13, 2024

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
On August 23, 2021, the City Council approved and authorized the City Manager to execute a Master Right of Way Agreement (AFN 904) with ICC Networking (ICCN) for the design, installation and deployment of a Citywide Wireless Internet Network with an initial focus on connecting the City's downtown and public facilities; and eventually expanding to a citywide wireless network.

As a result of significant new investment, a new company was created to implement the network more quickly. Though a new agreement, the approval of Agreement File No. 1040 is essentially an assignment of the previous master right of way agreement to the new entity, Tradewinds Networks Inc. (TNI). The major terms and conditions are the same from the previous agreement, the company president and key personnel are the same, and TNI has committed to the same network implementation timeline.

RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL
1) Authorize the City Manager to execute Master Right of Way Agreement AFN 1040, in a form approved by the City Attorney, with Tradewinds Networks Inc. for the design, installation and deployment of a Citywide Wireless Network with a revenue sharing component; or
2) Alternatively, discuss and take other action related to this item.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no cost to the City to assign the agreement from ICCN to TNI. The City's share of TNI's advertising revenue is 10% for year 3 of the agreement and 20% going forward.

The amount of revenue will depend on the number of users of the network. Pursuant to the original agreement, the City has budgeted $1,000,000 towards the purchase of 10,000 in -home wireless modems for income qualifying households. This action makes no changes to that budget or revenue structure.

Page 1 of 2 ends

Page 1 of 22 ends

Staff Report — Tradewinds Networks Inc. Master ROW Agreement May 13, 2024

Page 2 of 2 ends

DISCUSSION
On August 23, 2021, after a Request for Proposal process, the City Council approved and authorized the City Manager to execute a Master Right of Way Agreement (AFN 904) with ICC Networking (ICCN) for the design, installation and deployment of a Citywide Wireless Internet Network with an initial focus on connecting the City's downtown and public facilities; and eventually expanding to a citywide wireless network.

As a result of significant new investment into the project, a new company was created to implement the network more quickly and avoiding previously experienced delays through less reliance on third party suppliers as well as an increase in the use of North American production and assembly facilities.

Though a new agreement, the approval of Agreement File No. 1040 is essentially an assignment of the previous master right of way agreement with ICCN to the new entity, Tradewinds Networks Inc. (TNI). The major terms and conditions are the same from the previous agreement, the company president and key personnel are the same, and TNI has committed to the same network implementation timeline.

ATTACHMENT
Attachment No. 1 — Master Right of Way Agreement AFN 1040 3

Page 2 of 22 ends

MASTER RIGHT OF WAY AGREEMENT FILE NO. 1040

BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF BELLFLOWER AND
TRADEWINDS NETWORKS INC.

FOR MINI CELL INSTALLATION

AND CITYWIDE WIRELESS BROADBAND SERVICES
This Master Right of Way Agreement (the "Agreement") made this 13th day of May, 2024 between CITY OF BELLFLOWER, a general law city and municipal corporation ("City") and TRADEWINDS NETWORKS INC., a Delaware corporation ("Provider"). The Parties agree as follows.

1. RECITALS. The Parties enter into this Agreement with reference to the following:

A. Provider desires to install, maintain and operate wired or wireless communications equipment (collectively, "Communication Equipment") in and/or upon City's right-of-way;
B. City seeks to provide its residents with greater accessibility to digital communications within the community;
C. Provider is solely responsible to secure authorization of the owner of any pole or structure in order to deploy the Communications Equipment and will obtain a City permit for each location; and

2. PROPRIETARY CAPACITY. City is acting in its proprietary capacity as a Party to this Agreement. The aesthetics of permitting Provider to install Communications Equipment at various locations within the community is a critical condition of the authorization set forth in this Agreement.

3. LICENSE TO USE PROPERTY.

A. Subject to this Agreement, City agrees to license Provider to use certain space (the "Space") located in City's right-of-way and other real property owned by City in fee (collectively, the "Property") for installing, operating, and maintaining Communication Equipment only. The Property may not be used for any other purpose. The license includes the following:

1. "Access Space" which constitutes the non-exclusive right of ingress and egress to/from the Property at all times (subject, however, to Permits issued by City where streets must be closed or other work restrictions are imposed because of holidays or emergencies) and to/from the Premises (as defined below) to install, operate and maintain the Communications Equipment.

Page 1 of 15 ends

Page 3 of 22 ends

City of Bellflower
Agreement File No. 1040
Tradewinds Networks Inc.

Page 2 of 15 ends

2. "Antenna Space" which constitutes space needed to install, maintain and operate of antennas and associated equipment;

3. "Cabling Space" which constitutes space for installing, operating and maintaining wires, cables, conduits and pipes running between and among the Space and Antenna Space and all necessary electrical and telephone utility sources located on the Property;
B. The Access Space, Antenna Space, Cabling Space, and Space are collectively referenced as the "Premises" and must be as identified in encroachment permits (the "Permits") issued by City in accordance with the Bellflower Municipal Code ("BMC").

C. Provider is solely responsible to secure authorization from the owner of any pole or structure for purposes of attaching Communications Equipment for which a permit is sought.

D. If the Property has insufficient access to electric, telephone, cable or fiber utility sources, then City will issue to Provider or the local utility Provider a Permit to install such utilities on, over and/or under the Property necessary for Provider to operate its Communications Equipment.

E. City must approve the height, material, design, and placement of the Communications Equipment. Such approval will not be unreasonably withheld.

The City Manager, or designee, may make such determination.

4. USE OF PREMISES.

A. Provider is responsible for the planning, design, funding, and maintenance of the communication network intended to deliver electronic communication connectivity to all parts of City in accordance with this Agreement.

B. The network will consist of multiple wired and wireless technologies and other communication methods to reach the greatest number of City residents as is technologically practicable. The network will be open to City residents; visitors; businesses and government.

C. Provider will undertake its best efforts to provide electronic communications coverage in areas that include residential, commercial, government, streets, alleys, public areas, and other locations that will foreseeably become available during the term of this Agreement. There may be geographical limitations or regions not in need of communication technology. Such areas of exclusions will be reported to City.

D. Provider will deploy a communications network that meets or exceeds national

Page 4 of 22 ends

City of Bellflower
Agreement File No. 1040
Tradewinds Networks Inc.

Page 3 of 15 ends

average performance as determined by the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC") while seeking to be on par with local competitors of similar residential device connections to a network.

E. Provider may utilize a revenue model based on subscribers and registered users to the network. City users, however, will not pay for the use of the network once it is live and operational. Moreover, no usage may violate any existing or future Provider Terms and Conditions, or Usage rules.

F. Provider may deploy the network in phases once those phases are confirmed to City. Phases may occur in parallel with each other based on success of deployments, funding, and Permits.

G. City has no requirements regarding data provided to Provider by users accessing the network. Provider must comply with all applicable laws regarding consumer privacy including without limitation, the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA).

H. Provider will provide unlimited and no -cost network access to City for public service announcements including, without limitation, emergency notification; community alerts; and other government speech.

City will provide access and support for successful use of the Premises to Provider including, without limitation:

1. Facilitating processing of Permits for Communication Equipment upon Property and Premises;

2. City will cooperate with Provider in reasonable marketing efforts to encourage network use, enable visibility, and knowledge of the network.

J. City authorized the expenditure of $1,000,000 for 10,000 in -home customer premise equipment (CPE) units for qualified Bellflower households as described in Appendix A and Exhibit A which are incorporated by reference.

K. Provider will provide network expansion to cover up to 20,000 Bellflower, California households with voluntary, ultra -low cost, in -home broadband.

5. PERMITS. Before commencing any work on the Property, Provider must obtain Permits from City pursuant to the BMC. Each Permit will, for purposes of this Agreement, identify a licensed location for installing Communications Equipment subject to this Agreement (a "Licensed Location"). The Permits themselves, however, are governed by the BMC and not this Agreement, i.e., the conditions included in each Permit will be specific for a Licensed Location and are subject to all regulations within the BMC. Provider may surrender Licensed Locations at any time with or without cause upon 90 -day notice to City. In an effort to continue to provide services to the community, City will work with

Page 5 of 22 ends

City of Bellflower
Agreement File No. 1040
Tradewinds Networks Inc.

Page 4 of 15 ends

Provider to identify equal or better alternate locations, before the surrender of an existing location. Provider must provide evidence of authorization to attach Communications Equipment to a pole or structure owned by an entity other than City for a Permit to be issued for that location.

6. TERM; FEES AND PAYMENTS.

A. Unless otherwise terminated, this Agreement will be for a term of 10 years commencing upon the execution of this Agreement. Provider may terminate this Agreement upon written notice of the intent to terminate at least one year before the end of the then current term. City may change, amend, or terminate Provider's use of the Property at any time, and in its sole discretion verbally or in writing with a 60 -day notice.

B. The Licensed Location for installed Communication Equipment will become effective upon City accepting a notice of completion from Provider for that Licensed Location upon the Property (the "Effective Approval Date"). Thereafter, the Permit for a Licensed Location will be coterminous with this Agreement.

C. This Agreement will renew automatically on its anniversary date for four additional 5 -year terms unless terminated by a Party in accordance with this Agreement.

D. Provider will pay City no fees, permit or otherwise for Licensed Locations under this Agreement.

7. CONSIDERATION. In consideration for the use of public rights of way for the purchase and installation of Communications Equipment and providing a voluntary, no -charge citywide wireless communications network to the residents of Bellflower, with an option to purchase low- cost in -home broadband services. Provider will offer City a share of ongoing revenues during the life of the Agreement based on the example provided in Appendix A.

A. Provider must achieve network use of at least 15% of the City's population to make the network financially viable. Appendix A provides estimated costs, projections, and potential revenue sharing results.

B. Network investors will be paid first, within the initial 24 to 36 months of network deployment. The timeline is an estimate only and can be impacted by various factors including permitting, network usage, marketing, operating costs, and other factors not within control of Provider.

C. Provider acknowledges that revenue sharing with City will commence when network deployment is complete and network use reaches 15% of the City's population and agrees to provide regular usage data and deployment updates to City.

Page 6 of 22 ends

City of Bellflower
Agreement File No. 1040
Tradewinds Networks Inc.

Page 5 of 15 ends

8. CONDEMNATION. If all or part of the Property is acquired by eminent domain or purchase in lieu thereof, Provider acknowledges that it will have no claim to any compensation awarded for the taking of Property or any portion thereof or for loss of or damage to Provider's improvements.

9. RELOCATION BENEFITS. Provider acknowledges that it has been informed that City is a public entity and that Property was previously acquired by City for a public purpose. Provider further acknowledges that any rights acquired under this Agreement arose after the date of acquisition of Property and that said rights are subject to termination when Property is needed by City. Provider hereby acknowledges that at the time of said termination of this Agreement by City, it will not be a "displaced person" entitled to any of the relocation assistance or benefits offered to displaced persons under State or Federal law.

10. ALTERATIONS. Provider will not make, or cause to be made, any alterations to the Property, or any part thereof, without City's prior written consent.

11. HAZARDOUS/TOXIC WASTE. City has not, nor, to City's knowledge, has any third party used, generated, stored or disposed of, or permitted the use, generation, storage or disposal of, any Hazardous Material (as defined below) on, under, about or within the Property in violation of any law or regulation. Provider agrees that it will not use, generate, store or dispose of any Hazardous Material (as defined below) on, under, about or within the Property in violation of any law or regulation. Provider agrees to defend and indemnify City, to the extent stated in Section 14, against any and all losses, liabilities, claims or costs arising from any breach of any warranty or agreement contained in this Section. As used in this Section, "Hazardous Material" means any substance, chemical or waste that is identified as hazardous, toxic or dangerous in any applicable federal, state or local law or regulation (including petroleum and asbestos).

12. SIGNS. Provider will not place any sign upon the Property without City's prior written consent.

Provider will pay for all costs of any approved signage and comply with all applicable sign codes and ordinances.

13. ASSIGNMENT. Provider will not be permitted to assign this Agreement or any interest therein without City's written permission. The City Manager is authorized to grant such permission which will not be unreasonably withheld, unless the assignment is due to an acquisition or merger, or by a successor of all or substantially all of the Provider's business or assets.

14. INDEMNIFICATION.

A. Provider will hold City harmless and free from any and all liability arising out of this Agreement, or its performance, except for such loss or damage arising from City's sole negligence or willful misconduct. Should City be named in any suit, or should any claim be against it, by suit or otherwise, whether the same be groundless or not, arising out of this Agreement, or its performance, pursuant to this Agreement,

Page 7 of 22 ends

City of Bellflower
Agreement File No. 1040
Tradewinds Networks Inc.

Page 6 of 15 ends

Provider will defend City (at City's request and with counsel satisfactory to City) and will indemnify it for any judgment rendered against it or any sums paid out in settlement or otherwise.

B. For purposes of this section "City" includes City's officers, officials, employees, agents, representatives, and certified volunteers.

C. Provider expressly agrees that this release, waiver, and indemnity agreement is intended to be as broad and inclusive as is permitted by the law of the State of California and that if any portion is held invalid, it is agreed that the balance will, notwithstanding, continue in full legal force and effect.

D. It is expressly understood and agreed that the foregoing provisions will survive termination of this Agreement.

E. The requirements as to the types and limits of insurance coverage to be maintained by Provider as required by below, and any approval of said insurance by City, are not intended to and will not in any manner limit or qualify the liabilities and obligations otherwise assumed by Provider pursuant to this Agreement, including but not limited to the provisions concerning indemnification.

15. INSURANCE.

A. Before commencing performance under this Agreement, and at all other times this Agreement is effective, Provider will procure and maintain the following types of insurance with coverage limits complying, at a minimum, with the limits set forth below:

Type of Insurance Limits (combined single)
Commercial general liability: $2,000,000
Workers compensation Statutory limits
B. Commercial general liability insurance will meet or exceed the requirements of the most current ISO Forms. The amount of insurance set forth above will be a combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury, and property damage for the policy coverage. Liability policies must be endorsed to name City, its officials, and employees as "additional insureds" under said insurance coverage and to state that such insurance will be deemed "primary" such that any other insurance that may be carried by City will be excess thereto. Such insurance will be on an "occurrence," not a "claims made," basis and will not be cancelable except upon thirty (30) days prior written notice to City except for nonpayment of premiums which may be cancelable upon ten (10) day notice.

Page 8 of 22 ends

City of Bellflower
Agreement File No. 1040
Tradewinds Networks Inc.

Page 7 of 15 ends

C. Provider will furnish to City duly authenticated Certificates of Insurance and Endorsements evidencing maintenance of the insurance required under this Agreement and such other evidence of insurance or copies of policies as may be reasonably required by City from time to time. Insurance must be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best Company Rating equivalent to at least a Rating of "A:VII." Certificate(s) must reflect that the insurer will provide thirty (30) day notice of any cancellation of coverage. Provider will require its insurer to modify such certificates to delete any exculpatory wording stating that failure of the insurer to mail written notice of cancellation imposes no obligation, and to delete the word "endeavor" with regard to any notice provisions.

D. Should Provider, for any reason, fail to obtain and maintain the insurance required by this Agreement, City may obtain such coverage at Provider's expense and charge the cost of such insurance to Provider under this Agreement or terminate.

E. All policies required by this Agreement must allow City, as additional insured, to satisfy the self -insured retention ("SIR") and deductible of the policy in lieu of Provider (as the named insured) should Provider fail to pay the SIR or deductible requirements. The amount of the SIR or deductible is subject to the approval of the City Attorney and the Finance Director. Provider understands and agrees that satisfaction of this requirement is an express condition precedent to the effectiveness of this Agreement. Failure by Provider as primary insured to pay its SIR or deductible constitutes a material breach of this Agreement. Should City pay the SIR or deductible on Provider's behalf upon the Provider's failure or refusal to do so in order to secure defense and indemnification as an additional insured under the policy, City may include such amounts as damages in any action against Provider for breach of this Agreement in addition to any other damages incurred by City due to the breach.

16. COMPLIANCE WITH LAW. Provider will, at its sole cost and expense, comply with all of the requirements of all federal, state, and local authorities now in force, or which may hereafter be in force, pertaining to the Property and will faithfully observe in the use of the Property all applicable laws. The judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, or the admission of Provider in any action or proceeding against Provider, whether City be a party thereto or not, that Provider has violated any such ordinance or statute in the use of the Property will be conclusive of that fact as between City and Provider.

17. INTERFERENCE.

A. Provider agrees that Provider's Communication Equipment will not cause interference that is measurable in accordance with industry standards to any City communications equipment including, without limitation, traffic signal control equipment. City agrees that City will not cause interference that is measurable in accordance with industry standards to the Communication Equipment.

Page 9 of 22 ends

City of Bellflower
Agreement File No. 1040
Tradewinds Networks Inc.

Page 8 of 15 ends

B. Without limiting any other rights or remedies, if interference occurs and continues for a period exceeding 48 hours following notice to the interfering party via telephone to Provider's Network Operations Center at (a telephone number to be provided before the network going live, or to City at (562) 804-1424, extension 2010, the interfering party must reduce power or cease operations of the interfering equipment until the interference is cured.

C. The Parties acknowledge that there will not be an adequate remedy at law for noncompliance with the provisions of this section and therefore the Parties have the right to equitable remedies such as, without limitation, injunctive relief and specific performance.

18. REMOVAL AT END OF TERM; TERMINATION; ABANDONMENT OF RIGHT-OF- WAY; WIDENING.

A. Provider will, within 120 days after termination of this Agreement, restore the Property to its original condition, reasonable wear and tear and casualty damage excepted. City agrees and acknowledges that all of the Communication Equipment will remain the personal property of Provider and Provider will have the right to remove the same at any time during the Term, whether or not said items are considered fixtures and attachments to real property under applicable laws.

B. The Parties recognize that City may hold an easement interest only in certain of its Property. Upon abandonment by City of a road or section thereof, Provider may have no rights against the owner of the underlying fee estate to maintain its facilities. Provider will have no right to cause City to continue to operate such Property. In the event, in its reasonable discretion, City determines it is in the public interest to abandon such Property, the affected Licensed Location will terminate and Provider will not be obligated to pay City further fees for such Licensed Location.

C. The Parties recognize that City may from time to time widen, expand and/or add sidewalks, bike trails or make other right-of-way improvements (collectively referred to as "Widening Improvements"). In the event that Provider's Communication Equipment must be moved to accommodate said improvements.

City may, but is not required to, work with Provider to identify equal or better alternate locations, before the surrender of an existing location.

19. RIGHTS UPON SALE. Except as otherwise provided, should City at any time during the Term decide (i) to sell or transfer all or any part of the Property to a purchaser other than Provider, or (ii) to grant to a third party by easement or other legal instrument an interest in and to a portion of a Licensed Location, or a larger portion thereof, for the purpose of operating and maintaining communications facilities or the management thereof, such sale or grant of an easement or interest therein will be under and subject to this Agreement and any such purchaser or transferee will recognize Provider's contractual rights.

Page 10 of 22 ends

City of Bellflower
Agreement File No. 1040
Tradewinds Networks Inc.

Page 9 of 15 ends

20. DEFAULT. In the event there is a breach by a Party with respect to any of the provisions of this Agreement or its obligations under it, the non -breaching Party will give the breaching Party written notice of such breach. After receipt of such written notice, the breaching Party will have 60 days in which to cure any breach, provided the breaching Party will have such extended period as may be required beyond the sixty 60 days if the breaching Party commences the cure within the 60 -day period and thereafter continuously and diligently pursues the cure to completion. The non -breaching Party may not maintain any action or effect any remedies for default against the breaching Party unless and until the breaching Party has failed to cure the breach within the time periods provided in this Paragraph.

21. CASUALTY. In the event of damage by fire or other casualty to the Premises, not the fault or cause of Provider, that cannot reasonably be expected to be repaired within 45 days following same or if the Property is damaged by fire or other casualty so that such damage may reasonably be expected to disrupt Provider's operations at the Premises for more than 45 days, then Provider may, at any time following such fire or other casualty, provided City has not completed the restoration required to permit Provider to resume its operation at the Premises, may terminate this Agreement upon 15 days prior written notice to City. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the casualty is not the fault or cause of Provider then the fees owed to City will abate during the period of repair following such fire or other casualty in proportion to the degree to which Provider's use of the Premises is impaired.

22. WAIVER OF BREACH. Any express or implied waiver of a breach of any term of this Agreement will not constitute a waiver of any further breach of the same or other term of this Agreement.

23. ENTRY BY CITY AND PUBLIC. Neither this Agreement nor any Permit conveys any property interest to Provider. Except for areas restricted because of safety concerns, City and the general public will have unrestricted access upon Property for all lawful acts.

24. POSSESSORY INTEREST TAXES. While this Agreement constitutes a license to use real property without any possessory interest granted to Provider, City nevertheless informs Provider pursuant to Revenue & Taxation Code § 107.6 that any property interest in the Property may be subject to property taxation if created and that Provider may be subject to the payment of property taxes levied on its interest. Provider may not deduct such amount from payments to City.

25. INSOLVENCY; RECEIVER. Either the appointment of a receiver to take possession of all or substantially all of the assets of Provider, or a general assignment by the Provider for the benefit of creditors, or any action taken or offered by Provider under any insolvency or bankruptcy action, will constitute a breach of this Agreement by Provider, and in such event said license will automatically cease and terminate.

Page 11 of 22 ends

City of Bellflower
Agreement File No. 1040
Tradewinds Networks Inc.

Page 10 of 15 ends

26. NOTICES. Except as otherwise expressly provided by law, all notices or other communications required or permitted by this Agreement or by law to be served on or given to either party to this Agreement by the other party will be in writing and will be deemed served when personally delivered to the party to whom they are directed, or in lieu of the personal service, upon deposit in the United States Mail, certified or registered mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid, addressed to Provider at:

To City
City Manager
City of Bellflower
16600 Civic Center Dr,
Bellflower, CA 90706
To Provider:

Tradewinds Networks Inc.
11801 Pierce St., 2nd FL
Riverside, CA 92505
Attn: Keith Alexis
Either party may change its address for the purpose of this Section by giving written notice of the change to the other party.

27.ACCEPTANCE OF ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES. This Agreement and its amendments may be executed with electronic signatures in accordance with Government Code §16.5. Such electronic signatures will be treated in all respects as having the same effect as an original signature.

28. GOVERNING LAW. This license has been made in and will be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California and exclusive venue for any action involving this Agreement will be in Los Angeles County.

29. PARTIAL INVALIDITY. Should any provision of this Agreement be held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be either invalid or unenforceable, the remaining provisions of this Agreement will remain in effect, unimpaired by the holding.

30. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This instrument and its Attachments constitute the sole agreement between City and Provider respecting Property, the use of Property by Provider, and the specified license term, and correctly sets forth the obligations of City and Provider. Any agreement or representations respecting Property or its licensing by City to Provider not expressly set forth in this instrument are void.

Page 12 of 22 ends

City of Bellflower
Agreement File No. 1040
Tradewinds Networks Inc.

Page 11 of 15 ends

31. CONSTRUCTION. The language of each part of this Agreement will be construed simply and according to its fair meaning, and this Agreement will never be construed either for or against either party.

32.AUTHORITY/MODIFICATION. The Parties represent and warrant that all necessary action has been taken by the Parties to authorize the undersigned to execute this Agreement and to engage in the actions described herein. This license may be modified by written agreement. City's city manager, or designee, may execute any such amendment on behalf of City.

33. COUNTERPARTS. This license may be executed in any number or counterparts, each of which will be an original, but all of which together will constitute one instrument executed on the same date.

34. MUNICIPAL POWERS. Nothing in this Agreement is intended to, nor can it, act as a limitation on City's present or future exercise of police powers in accordance with the California Constitution and applicable law.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement the day and year first hereinabove written.

CITY OF BELLFLOWER TRADEWINDS NETWORKS INC.

Ryan Smoot, City Manager Keith Alexis, President
ATTEST:

Mayra Ochiqui, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Karl H. Berger, City Attorney
Taxpayer ID No. 99-0620615

Page 13 of 22 ends

City of Bellflower
Agreement File No. 1040
Tradewinds Networks Inc.

Page 12 of 15 ends

Appendix A
Estimated network cost, revenue, and revenue sharing.

Due to the flexible and undulating nature of ad revenue, these are estimated projections, provided as guidance and will be updated quarterly and reported to City with a report on the progress.

Deployment locations and Phases:

PFH13E
PHASE`
Estimated cost of deployment for each section. This cost is carried but the investor group working in tandem with Tradewinds Networks Inc. as part of the TEA (TNi Equity Access) program to bridge the digital divide. These deployment values are estimates only and will be confirmed once final site surveys are completed.

Item
EST. Cost
EST. Months to
ROI
Phase 1 - POC
$75,000
12 Phase 2
$350,000
15 Phase 3
$350,000 15
Phase 4
EST Accumulated
Monthly Ad Rev
$15,000
$25,000
$30,000
$250,000 12 $37,000
Phase 5
$250,000 12
Total Private Investment $1,275,000
$40,000+

Page 14 of 22 ends

City of Bellflower
Agreement File No. 1040
Tradewinds Networks Inc.

Page 13 of 15 ends

REVENUE MODEL:

The TEA Program works with investors, local community groups, and federal, state, and local grant programs to facilitate IP networks for cities. Once live, the network is monetized using various revenue options to help pay for initial investment, ongoing support, maintenance, and expansion. Repayment of the initial network funding typically takes 24-36 months based on adoption rates. Once repayment of the initial network and infrastructure is complete, the revenue sharing with the City will begin.

The City of Bellflower's Estimated Ad Revenue Sharing Plan Based on estimated gross revenue from advertising monetization TEA
Program
Year
Estimated
Monthly
Revenue
Estimated
Annual Gross
Revenue
Revenue
Donation
Rate
Estimated
Annual
Program
Donation
Year 3
$73,708
$884,496
10%
$88,450
Year4
$96,508
$1,158,096
20%
$231,619
Year 5
$144,721
$1,736,652
20%
$347,330
Year 6
$173,556
$2,082,672
20%
$416,534
Year 7
$250,863
$3,010,356
20%
$602,071
Year 8
$250,863
$3,010,356
20%
$602,071
Year 9
$250,863
$3,010,356
20%
$602,071
Year 10
$250,863
$3,010,356
20%
$602,071
Category definitions:

1. TEA Program Year — Each year the City is eligible for network revenue sharing

2. Est. Monthly Revenue — An estimate of the average total revenue per month for a 12 -month period

3. Est. Annual Gross Revenue — An estimate of the average total revenue per year

4. Rev Donation Rate — This is the percentage of revenue shared with the City for that year

5. Est. Annual Program Donation — The total estimated revenue given to the City in that one year.

NOTE: These revenue projections are subject to fluctuations, both upward and downward, throughout the duration of the agreement, and are provided as estimates. Various factors, including but not limited to market conditions, regulatory changes, and unforeseen events, may impact the actual revenues experienced.

Page 15 of 22 ends

City of Bellflower
Agreement File No. 1040
Tradewinds Networks Inc.

Page 14 of 15 ends

NOTE:

Delay of payments to the investors and City can include events the Provider cannot control including without limitation:
• Acts of God and other Force Majeure events beyond the control of the provider • Construction, permit, regulatory, and installer delays • Delays due to public notices provided in response to pandemic and other health or non -health emergencies
• Limitation of location for equipment installations
• Supplier shortages or supply chain disruptions
• Any other limitation or delay that the Provider reports to the City

Page 16 of 22 ends

City of Bellflower
Agreement File No. 1040
Tradewinds Networks Inc.

Page 15 of 15 ends

Exhibit A

CITY OF BELLFLOWER
BUDGET RESOLUTION NO. 23-34

Page 17 of 22 ends

CITY OF BELLFLOWER
RESOLUTION NO. 23-34

A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE OPERATING BUDGET
FOR FISCAL YEARS 2022-2024 TO CARRYOVER AND

ADJUST VARIOUS CAPITAL PROJECTS, ACTIVITIES, AND
REVENUES; AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO

IMPLEMENT THIS RESOLUTION
THE CITY COUNCIL RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. The City Council finds and declares as follows:

A. On June 14, 2021, the City Council adopted the 2021-2023 Operating Budget (Resolution No. 21-36), and on June 12, 2023, the City Council adopted the 2023-2025 Operating Budget (Resolution No. 23-22); and B. Due to uncompleted multi -year capital projects and certain subsequent activities and developments, budget amendments are necessary for fiscal years 2022-2024.

SECTION 2. The City Council approves the budget amendments for fiscal years 2022-2024 attached as Exhibit "A," and incorporated by reference.

SECTION 3. The City Manager, or designee, is authorized to implement this Resolution. As part of that implementation, the City Manager is authorized to implement an employee appreciation program that, among other things, provides workplace incentives consistent with this Resolution including, without limitation, certificates of recognition; gift cards; and other indicia of appreciation. Such a program is in the public interest to attract and retain high quality employees which results in better public service. The expense of associated with such a public purpose is nominal as compared to the costs of high staff turn -over, loss of institutional knowledge, and reduction in customer service. The findings are consistent with Article IV, Section 17; Article XI, Section 10; and Article XVI, Section 6 of the California Constitution and California law.

SECTION 4. PLANNING AGENCY. Pursuant to Bellflower Municipal Code ("BMC") § 2.32.050(F), the City Council will act as the Bellflower Planning Agency for purposes of this Resolution. In accordance with Government Code § 65401, the Bellflower Public Works Department prepared and submitted a capital improvement plan ("CIP") to the Planning Agency. Government Code § 65103(c) requires the Planning Agency to annually review the City's CIP to determine whether the CIP is consistent with the Bellflower General Plan. The City Council finds that the CIP is consistent with the Bellflower General Plan.

Page 1 of 3 ends

Page 18 of 22 ends

3 City of Bellflower
Resolution No. 23-34

Page 2 of 3 ends

SECTION 5. REAPPROPRIATION. The City Manager, or designee, is authorized to reappropriate any unused appropriations for capital projects, special projects, grant programs, and contractual obligations at the close of a fiscal year to a subsequent fiscal year for the Budget and CIP and adjust that fiscal year's special and grant revenues and transfers accordingly.

SECTION 6. BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS. In addition to reappropriation, the Budget may also be adjusted as follows:

A. By majority vote of the City Council; or
B. By the City Manager, or designee, pursuant to the approved Policies.

SECTION 7. CONTRACTING AUTHORITY.

A. The City Manager, or designee, is authorized to bid and/or award contracts for the equipment, supplies, and services approved in the Budget in accordance with the BMC.

B. In accordance with the BMC, the City Manager, or designee, is authorized to execute all contracts awarded for equipment, supplies, and services approved in the Budget.

C. For all other services, equipment, and supplies, the City Manager, or designee, is authorized to execute contracts in accordance with the BMC.

SECTION 8. GENERAL FUND RESERVES. As of June 30, 2023, the Contingency Reserve is $10 million for cash flow needs and unforeseen contingencies such as emergencies, revenue shortfalls, mandates, or unanticipated inflation; and the Property Acquisition Reserve is $5 million as follows: $1,876,401 for properties held for development/resale and $3,123,599 in cash set -aside.

SECTION 9. INVESTMENTS. Government Code § 53607 allows the City Council to delegate investment authority to the City Treasurer, who may then designate persons to implement such authority. The City Council delegates the investment authority to the City Treasurer who is authorized to implement the Investment Policy on the City's behalf.

SECTION 10. This Resolution does not affect any penalty, forfeiture, or liability incurred before, or preclude prosecution and imposition of penalties for any violation occurring before, this Resolution's effective date. Any such amended part will remain in full force and effect for sustaining action or prosecuting violations occurring before the effective date of this Resolution.

Page 19 of 22 ends

4 City of Bellflower
Resolution No. 23-34

Page 3 of 3 ends

SECTION 11. If any part of this Resolution or its application is deemed invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, the City Council intends that such invalidity will not affect the effectiveness of the remaining provisions or applications and, to this end, the provisions of this Resolution are severable.

SECTION 12. Electronic Signatures. This Resolution may be executed with electronic signatures in accordance with Government Code §16.5. Such electronic signatures will be treated in all respects as having the same effect as an original signature.

SECTION 13. The Mayor, or presiding officer, is hereby authorized to affix his signature to this Resolution signifying its adoption by the City Council of the City of Bellflower, and the City Clerk, or her duly appointed deputy, is directed to attest thereto.

SECTION 14. This Resolution will become effective immediately upon adoption.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BELLFLOWER THIS 28TH DAY OF AUGUST 2023.

Sonny Santa Ines, Mayor
ATTEST:

Mayra Ochiqui, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Karl H. Berger, City Attorney
Attachment:

Exhibit A — Budget Amendments for Fiscal Years 2022-2024

Page 20 of 22 ends

5 EXHIBIT A
RESOLUTION NO . 23-34
A ccount Number Fund / Account Description
Adopted Amended
Fiscal Year Carryover Adjustments Budget Budget
140 42324 9000 State Gas Tax Fund / Bridge Maintenance 2023-24 59,695 0 100,000 159,695 320 47000 9000 Measure W Fund / Structural Improvements 2023-24 300,000 0 0 300,000 320 47010 9000 Measure W Fund / Stormwater Projects 2023-24 356,000 0 1,302,000 1,658,000 030 47011 9000 Special Grants Fund / Stormwater Capture Project -Caruthers Park 2023-24 10,200 0 20,000 30,200 030 34066 Special Grants Fund / Caltrans State Highway Account Grant 2023-24 10,200 0 20,000 30,200 320 47013 9000 Measure W Fund / Stormwater Capture Project -Simms Park 2023-24 1,549,857 0 8,151,131 9,700,988 320 35532 Measure W Fund / SCWP Regional Program Grant 2023-24 1,549,857 0 8,151,131 9,700,988 030 47148 9000 Special Grants Fund / Traffic Signal Improvements 2023-24 552,497 546,593 2,546,918 3,646,008 030 35670 Special Grants Fund / Measure R Highway Program Grant 2023-24 371,753 367,780 751,500 1,491,033 030 35780 Special Grants Fund / Measure M Multi -Year Subregional Grant 2023-24 180,744 178,813 1,795,418 2,154,975 013 47209 9000 DOT Highway Relinquishment Fund / Lakewood ADA Improvements 2023-24 200,000 0 200,000 400,000 011 47230 9000 General Projects Fund / Thompson Park Improvements 2023-24 45,618 0 111,000 156,618 011 47240 9000 General Projects Fund / Caruthers Park Improvements 2023-24 25,000 0 364,000 389,000 011 47253 9000 General Projects Fund / Public Safety Center 2023-24 97,413 0 0 97,413 011 47260 9000 General Projects Fund / City Maintenance Yard 2023-24 805,967 0 10,000 815,967 022 47260 9000 Public Facilities Fund / City M aintenance Yard 2023-24 8,290 21,210 0 29,500 020 47312 9000 Public Arts Fund / Gateway Sign 2023-24 424,416 0 0 424,416 024 47922 9000 Park Facilities Fund / Butterfly Garden 2023-24 511,598 0 100,000 611,598 030 47922 9000 Special Grants Fund / Butterfly Garden 2023-24 721,138 0 0 721,138 030 35210 Special Grants Fund / Land & Water Conservation Fund 2023-24 468,254 0 0 468,254 920 47160 9000 ARPA SLFRP Fund / Water Infrastructure Improvements 2023-24 0 1,656,000 3,344,000 5,000,000 011 47160 9000 General Projects Fund / Water Infrastructure Improvements 2023-24 0 (1,656,000) 1,656,000 0 920 35092 A RPA SLFRP Fund / ARPA SLFRP Funds 2023-24 0 756,000 4,244,000 5,000,000 920 44104 8020 ARPA SLFRP Fund / Wireless Broadband 2023-24 0 (900,000) 900,000 0 510 44104 4002 Economic Dev Fund / Wireless Broadband 2023-24 100,000 900,000 0 1,000,000 150 47500 3420 A QMD Fund / Equipment Purchases 2023-24 284,065 0 147,000 431,065 010 42022 4100 General Fund / Document Conversion / Planning 2023-24 4,000 0 15,000 19,000 600 42022 4120 Building & Safety Fund / Document Conversion 2023-24 10,000 0 15,000 25,000 600 31600 Building & Safety Fund / Building Permit Fees 2023-24 0 10,000 800,000 810,000 - Carryover of unexpended allocations and other adjustments. 2 • 125 4XXXX 3910 Measure R Fund / Bike Trail Maintenence Costs 2022-23 0 246,442 203,558 450,000 N 125 4XXXX 3710 Measure R Fund / Administration 2022-23 0 26,188 73,812 100,000 O 730 39000 Debt Sery Fund -2021 POBS / Transfers In 2022-23 0 919,934 0 919,934 N 944 30100 Parking District Fund / Property Assessment 2022-23 0 21,400 21,200 42,600

Page 1 of 2 ends

6 EXHIBIT A
RESOLUTION NO . 23-34
A ccount Number
Fund / Account Description
Adopted Amended
Fiscal Year Carryover Adjustments Budget Budget
944 4XXXX
710 48106
710 48132
030 35510
010 35510
010 42054
030 42054
010 41000
010 42534
311 49800
3410
5530
5530
8010
8010
1020
5000
9999
Parking District Fund / Maintenance Costs
BFA Debt Service Fund / Principal - MWS COPS Payoff
BFA Debt Service Fund / Principal - MTB Note
Special Grants Fund / Los Angeles County Grant
General Fund / Los Angeles County Grant
General Fund / Contract Services / Temporary Shelter
Special Grants Fund / Contract Services / Temporary Shelter General Fund / P&R Commission Stipends
General Fund / P&R Special Interest Programs
MWS Fund / 286 AF Water Rights to General Fund
- Adjustments based on actual / estimated actual.
010 49000 9999 General Fund / Transfers Out
510 39000 Economic Dev Fund / Transfers In
920 49000 9999 ARPA SLFRP Fund / Transfers Out
010 39070 General Fund / Transfers In
012 39000 Public Projects Fund / Transfers In
31X 49000 9999 MWS Fund / Transfers Out
- Adjustments to inter -fund transfers in and ou t.

ZZ Jo ZZ e6ed

Page 2 of 2 ends

2022-23 0
2022-23 0
2022-23 0
2022-23 0
2022-23 0
2022-23 0
2022-23 0
2022-23 0
2022-23 0
2022-23 0
2022-23 0
2022-23 0
2022-23 0
2022-23 0
2022-23 0
2022-23 0
15,222
5,470,000
751
500,000
(500,000)
(580,207)
580,207
600
74,300
1,160,243
1,205,000
1,205,000
1,330,044
1,330,044
12,341,719
12,341,719
33,678 48,900
280,000 5,750,000
37,666 38,417
0 500,000
500,000 0
1,365,000 784,793
798,332 1,378,539
3,000 3,600
78,000 152,300
0 1,160,243
4,697,816 5,902,816
240,000 1,445,000
3,513,718 4,843,762
3,513,718 4,843,762
0 12,341,719
0 12,341,719
7 c' p BELLFL 0„
'CROWING TOCib•
stafftePort
14-F
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
ATTENTION: Ryan Smoot, City Manager
FROM: Jim DellaLonga, Director of Economic Development
SUBJECT: Consideration and possible action to receive and file the Eligibility/Feasibility Analysis — Proposed Downtown Bellflower Enhanced Infrastructure Financing District.

DATE: May 13, 2024

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
In response to a number of consultant inquiries and L.A. Metro encouragement to form an Enhanced Infrastructure Financing District (EIFD) around the proposed future light rail station on Bellflower Boulevard, staff hired a consultant to assess the eligibility and feasibility of a potential EIFD.

In February 2024, an eligibility and feasibility analysis for a potential Enhanced Infrastructure Financing District (EIFD) was completed by Harris & Associates to determine its viability as a financing mechanism for sewer improvements for Downtown Bellflower and the area within approximately 1/2 mile of the proposed Southeast Gateway Line light rail station on Bellflower Boulevard. EIFDs are limited tax increment financing (TIF) districts created as a potential local government economic development tool after the dissolution of redevelopment. Due to the limited nature of these districts, locating an EIFD in high potential property tax growth areas along with the voluntary participation of the largest non -education taxing entity, the County, is key to the successful formation and implementation of an EIFD.

To be eligible and feasible, Los Angeles County would have to waive its policy of minimum requirements of participation in EIFDs and would have to participate with a tax increment property tax share of more than double that of the City's 6.67% of the 1`)/0 tax rate.

RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL
1) Receive and file the Eligibility/Feasibility Analysis — Proposed Downtown Bellflower Enhanced Infrastructure Financing District; or
2) Alternatively, discuss and take other action related to this item.

Page 1 of 2 ends

Page 1 of 30 ends

Staff Report — North Downtown Bellflower Parking
May 13, 2024

Page 2 ends

FISCAL IMPACT
None.

DISCUSSION
In 2022, a number of consultants and L.A. Metro contacted the City to establish an EIFD around the area of the future light rail station on Bellflower Boulevard. claiming that such a district could help capture the potential increased property values that often occur around light rail station sites. As a result of these inquiries and claims, the City Manager directed staff to hire a consultant (Harris & Associates) to provide an independent assessment regarding the feasibility of such an EIFD.

In February 2024, Harris & Associates completed the attached Eligibility/Feasibility Analysis — Proposed Downtown Bellflower Enhanced Infrastructure Financing District.

The study examined a potential EIFD to finance sewer system improvements generally located within the '/2 mile radius of the propose Southeast Gateway Line light rail station on Bellflower Boulevard. This location was chosen because of the tendency for areas near light rail stations to redevelop relatively quickly thereby increasing property tax.

Sewer system improvements in the area would increase sewer capacity to accommodate the potential anticipated increase in housing units built in the area around the light rail station.

EIFDs are limited tax increment financing (TIF) districts created as a potential local government economic development tool after the dissolution of redevelopment. They can only be used to finance infrastructure improvements and housing activities, and property taxing entities are not required to participate." The County of Los Angeles is the largest property taxing entity at 48.34% of the 1`)/0 property tax rate and has an EIFD Policy Manual that outlines the minimum requirements of County participation in EIFDs.

Education based property taxing entities, such as school districts, are not eligible to participate in EIFDs.

Pursuant to the County's EIFD Policy Manual, in order for it to consider participation in an EIFD, a City must have a property tax share of at least 15% of the 1% tax rate. The City's property tax share is 6.67%. The Policy Manual also states that the County will only potentially contribute tax increment up to the amount that the City would contribute.

Not only is the City's property tax share already below the County's minimum threshold for participation, but it would need a significantly higher contribution of tax increment by the County to make the financing of the sewer infrastructure improvements feasible.

The analysis concludes that although the proposed EIFD can meet a number of the County's minimum requirements for consideration, it does not meet the following key requirements rendering it ineligible and infeasible:

1. The City of Bellflower does not meet the County's minimum property tax share requirement of 15% of the 1% for the County to consider participating in the proposed EIFD;

Page 2 of 30 ends

Staff Report — North Downtown Bellflower Parking
May 13, 2024

Page 2 of 2 ends

DISCUSSION — Continued

2. Even if the County were to waive the 15% requirement described above, its Policy Manual states that it will only potentially contribute a tax increment percentage up to the amount that the City would generate/contribute. At the City's property tax share of 6.67% of the 1% tax rate, this would not generate enough tax increment to finance the proposed improvements. For the proposed project to be financially feasible, the County would need to contribute approximately 14% of its property tax share.

ATTACHMENT
Eligibility/Feasibility Analysis — Proposed Downtown Bellflower Enhanced Infrastructure Financing District 3

Page 3 of 30 ends

Eligibility/Feasibility Analysis —
Proposed Downtown Bellflower
Enhanced Infrastructure Financing
i District

CITY OF BELLFLOWER
February 16, 2024
Prepared for:

CITY OF BELLFLOWER
Prepared by:

Harris & Associates
101 Progress, Suite 250
Irvine, California 92618
(949) 655-3900

Page 4 of 30 ends

Table of Contents
Section 1 Introduction 2

1.1 Executive Summary 2

1.2 Background 3

1.3 EIFD Area 4

1.3.1 Boundary 4
Section 2 County Participation Requirements 6

2.1 Minimum Requirements 6

2.1.1 County Benefit Fiscal Analysis 7
Section 3 Tax Increment Projection Analysis 9

3.1 Assumptions 9

3.1.1 Base Assumptions (Non -RDA EIFD Area and RDA EIFD Area) 9

3.1.2 RDA EIFD Area Assumptions (EIFD Area Within RDA Only) 13

3.2 Tax Increment Projection Methodology 15

3.2.1 Non -RDA EIFD Area Before Successor Agency Dissolution 16

3.2.2 RDA EIFD Area Pre -Successor Agency Dissolution 17

3.2.3 Total EIFD Area Post -Successor Agency Dissolution 18

3.2.4 Tax Increment Projection Summary 20

3.3 Infrastructure Cost Analysis 20

3.4 Additional Potential Costs to the City 22
Section 4 Conclusion 24
Appendix A — Bellflower EIFD 45 -Year Tax Increment Projection 25 1

Page 5 of 30 ends

Section 1 Introduction

1.1 Executive Summary
Harris & Associates ("Harris") was retained by the city of Bellflower ("City" or "Bellflower") to analyze the eligibility and feasibility of an enhanced infrastructure financing district ("EIFD") in the Downtown Bellflower Transit Oriented Development Specific Plan ("TODSP") area and some other surrounding areas. The proposed EIFD area revolves around the expected development of a station for the new Metro light rail that will run between southeast Los Angeles County and downtown Los Angeles. A map of the proposed EIFD area can be found in Figure 1: EIFD Area on page 5 of this study. The City wishes to evaluate the potential EIFD to fund sewer improvements to allow for projected development around the proposed station.

Harris has analyzed both the financial feasibility and the eligibility of the proposed EIFD pursuant to:
• The County of Los Angeles ("County") Board of Supervisors ("Board") EIFD Policy Manual ("Policy Manual"), which outlines the minimum requirements of County participation in EIFDs. • California Government Code ("GC") Sections 53398.5 through 53398.58, which outline all requirements for the formation of EIFDs.

The primary findings of the analysis include the following:
• An EIFD in the City does not meet the County's minimum requirements for the City's share of the 1% property tax rate (a 15% minimum is required). The City's 1% tax rate in the EIFD area is 6.67%.
• The County's participation is critical to the feasibility of an EIFD due to the much higher share of the 1% property tax at 48.34%. However, the County requirements state that it will only potentially contribute tax increment up to the amount that the City would generate, significantly limiting the potential tax increment generated. The projected cost of the needed sewer improvements is $17.4 million in 2023 dollars. The proposed EIFD is projected to generate just $113,592,337 over a 45 -year period.
• The proposed sewer improvements will be challenging as the County owns the infrastructure. 2

Page 6 of 30 ends

1.2 Background
EIFDs are limited tax increment financing ("TIF") districts created after the dissolution of redevelopment agencies in 2011. TIF for EIFDs freezes the property tax revenues for participating taxing entities that flow from a designated area to a city, county, or other taxing entities at a base level for the current year.

Any additional, incremental tax revenue to participating taxing entities in future years is diverted into a separate pool of funds that can pay for improvements to an EIFD area or pay back bonds issued against anticipated TIF revenuer. It is important to note that only the local jurisdiction can collect tax increment from EIFDs unless other, non -education taxing entities, like a county, opt in.

Senate Bill ("SB") 628, enacted into law on September 29, 2014, modified existing Infrastructure Financing Districts into EIFDs to help cities and counties fund economic development projects.

However, several legislative measures have been passed since SB 628 adjusting EIFD requirements and uses including but not limited to: Assembly Bill 733 (2017) allows EIFDs to fund climate change adaptation projects including projects that address conditions that impact public health and extreme weather events; Senate Bill 1145 (2018) allows EIFDs to fund infrastructure maintenance costs; Assembly Bill 116 (2019) allows for EIFDs to issue bonds without a public vote while increasing public engagement requirements2; Assembly Bill 464 (2021) expands the types of facilities and projects EIFDs can fund to include small business structures impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic and nonprofit community organizations' facilities. Throughout these modifications, a county's participation in these districts has always been voluntary.

Once established, an EIFD can have a term of up to 45 years after the first bond is issued and can accomplish, but is not limited to, the following:
• Infrastructure maintenance,
• Transportation infrastructure,
• Sewage treatment,
• Housing development,
• Economic development,
• Climate adaptation projects,
• COVID-19 impacted small business structure improvements, and • Nonprofit community organization facility improvements. ' Enhanced Infrastructure Financing District (EIFD). Southern California Association of Governments ("SCAG"). (2021, January 11). https://scag.ca.gov/post/enhanced-infrastructure-financing-district-eifd 2 SCAG, Enhanced Infrastructure Financing District (EIFD). 3

Page 7 of 30 ends

For the purposes of this study, a 45 -year projection has been prepared.

1.3 EIFD Area

1.3.1 Boundary
The proposed Downtown Bellflower EIFD area ("EIFD Area"), which corresponds to the City's TODSP area with slight modifications, is comprised of approximately 550 acres and is located along Bellflower Boulevard between Interstate 91 and Jefferson Street. Figure 1: EIFD Area provides a detailed map of the proposed EIFD Area.

The figure also details the portion of the City's former Redevelopment Area #1 ("RDA") that is included in the EIFD Area. The RDA area is important to point out as the City's share of tax increment for properties in those areas is calculated differently than the properties outside the RDA for the duration of the RDA's remaining enforceable obligations. This creates two different areas that comprise the EIFD Area which will be referred to throughout this study:
• The area within the EIFD Area but outside of the former RDA ("Non -RDA EIFD Area") • The area within the EIFD Area and the former RDA ("RDA EIFD Area") This issue is discussed in greater detail in Section 3, Tax Increment Projection Analysis. 4

Page 8 of 30 ends

Figure 1: EIFD Area
u rel St
raps Ave
et Blvd
Blvd
unt
F wy
Ives St
Darnell St
Linden St
1111.11
Alondra_ Blvd I_L ;I'
�_ L✓•
Harvard St
-Olive St
Ma
Somerset
Continuation
High School
aple St
Walnut S C1
3-
n
m
Park St

1. Art:
co
CO
a
?FT Brac r
1es, al�i
ate Parks, sn, 1
Garmin, S fe.�
GeoTechnol ogiet. 1 _
METI/NASA, USe., tureaL.
:. !•® e EPA,
�• USDA
Arkan
3Cih . Palm St
0 3
St
a
r
II BE
111 Trabuco S•
Oregon Ave
■
Maple St 1.1,112440
Walnut St
ansas St
m
rt
Ramona
Cedar
Esri Community Maps Cc Angeles
California State Parks, Esri, HERE, Garmin, SateGraph, Geolechnologies, Inc METI/NASA, USGS, Bureau of Land Management, EPA, NPS, US Census Bureau.

Rose St USDA
California Ave
s
0 ''? St
0 a
—IfD Park St
Beach St
Midway St
Beverly St
Artesia -PI' --
Hacienda St
Monterey St
Blvd
EIFD Area
O City of Bellflower
//, RDA EIFD Area
Source: ('//r fBellflower
Harris & Associates N A,1 0.13 0.25 Downtown Bellflower Miles
EIFD Boundary
Downtown Bellflower EIFD Feasibility Memo
5

Page 9 of 30 ends

Section 2 County Participation Requirements

2.1 Minimum Requirements
In many cases, including for Bellflower, the goal(s) of an EIFD district will only be financially feasible with the County's involvement. Pursuant to the Policy Manual, the EIFD Area must meet all the following minimum requirements for the County to consider participating in an EIFD:

1. The City's share of property tax increment must equal a minimum of 15 cents ($0.15) for every dollar ($1.00) captured in the EIFD Area.

2. The City's contribution of property tax increment must be at least equal to that contributed by the County general fund and its special districts. Examples of County special districts include the Fire District, Flood Control District, and Library Fund.

3. The County must not be required to contribute 100% of its property tax increment.

4. A fiscal analysis conducted by the County Chief Executive Office ("CEO") must demonstrate a positive net impact to the County general fund as a result of the tax revenue generated from the EIFD Area.

5. In addition to supporting economic development, the proposed EIFD project must align with established Board priorities in one or more of the following areas: 1) affordable housing; 2) homelessness prevention; 3) workforce development; or 4) sustainability.

6. Any rental housing proposed for the EIFD must allocate a minimum of 20% of all units for affordable housing. In certain circumstances, this requirement may be satisfied through payment of an in -lieu fee, or through provision of an equivalent number of affordable housing units at a separate location in proximity to the economic development site.

7. The EIFD proposal must be consistent with Division 2 of Title 5 of the California GC (Section 53398.5 - 53398.58), which authorizes the formation of EIFDs.

Table 1: County Minimum Requirements analyzes how the EIFD Area and the proposed EIFD would meet the minimum requirements in the Policy Manual. The requirements in red are considered limiting factors for the County's involvement in the EIFD while the green signifies requirements that the Downtown Bellflower EIFD meets.
6

Page 10 of 30 ends

Table 1: County Minimum Requirements
Minimum Requirements
Analysis

1. The City's share of property tax increment must equal a minimum of 15 cents ($0.15) for every dollar ($1.00) captured in the EIFD Project Area.

The average City tax share is 6.67% of the 1% property tax in TRAs that make up the EIFD Area. This is less than the 15% required to be considered for County participation in the EIFD.

2. The City's contribution of property tax increment must be at least equal to that contributed by the County General Fund and it's special districts. Examples of County special districts include the Fire District, Flood Control District, and Library Fund.

The average 1% City tax share in TRAs that make up the EIFD Area is

6.67% with the County General Fund share alone is 25.06%. The TIP scenario assumes that the County will match what the City is contributing which means the City's contribution will be equal to that of the County.

3. The County must not be required to contribute 100% of its property tax increment.

In the TIP scenario, the County is matching the City's contribution which would be 14% of the County's property tax increment.

4. The Fiscal Analysis conducted by the CEO must demonstrate a positive net impact to the County General Fund as a result of the tax revenue generated from the Project area.
_
A Fiscal Analysis will still need to be conducted by the County on the proposed Downtown Bellflower EIFD. The City will most likely have to pay for this County -led analysis.

5. 6.

In addition to supporting economic development, the proposed EIFD Project must align with established Board priorities in one or more of the following areas: 1) affordable housing; 2) homelessness prevention; 3) workforce development; or 4) sustainability.

In an effort to meet this requirement, a 25% affordable housing set aside is being proposed in our TIP.

Any rental housing proposed for the EIFD must allocate a minimum of 20% of all units for affordable housing. In certain circumstances, this requirement may be satisfied through payment of an in -lieu fee, or through provision of an equivalent number of affordable housing units at a separate location in proximity to the economic development site.

To meet this requirement, the City must establish an inclusionary housing requirement or fee for all rental housing developed within the EIFD Are

7. The EIFD proposal must be consistent with Division 2 of Title 5 of the California Government Code (Section 53398.5 - 53398.58), which authorizes the formation of EIFDs.

Harris assumes that State Law will be adhered to throughout the formation of the EIFD.

Source: Lost Angeles County Board of Supervisors Policy Manual EIFD Minimum Requirements As shown in Table 1: County Minimum Requirements the proposed Downtown Bellflower EIFD meets just four of the seven minimum requirements set forth by the County for their participation in EIFDs.

County participation is crucial to the feasibility of EIFDs. While certain requirements such as requirements number ("No.") 4 and 6 could possibly be met by City action and cooperation, requirement No. 1 is the most limiting as the City cannot change its tax rate. As a reminder, the Policy Manual states that the County will consider participating only if an EIFD meets all the minimum requirements.

2.1.1 County Benefit Fiscal Analysis
The County requires that each request for EIFD participation include a fiscal analysis that estimates the expected financial impact to the County's general fund and any special districts that may contribute a portion of their tax increment share. The tax increment scenario detailed in Section 3.2 Tax Increment Methodology includes participation from the City and County only. No special districts are projected to participate in the EIFD in this scenario.

The County benefit fiscal analysis must include the following pursuant to the Policy Manual:

1. Anticipated growth in assessed value absent any new development;

2. Expected new development in terms of retail square footage, business park square footage, office space, apai tinent units, condominium units, housing units, hotel units, and parking spaces; 7

Page 11 of 30 ends

3. Tax increment generated as a result of each new development opportunity associated with the EIFD;

4. Tax increment contributions from each participating agency;

5. Scenario analysis based on differing contributions from each County taxing entity;

6. Property tax revenue resulting to each taxing entity based on new development and growth in assessed value;

7. Sales and transient occupancy tax revenues resulting to the City and County; and

8. Sensitivity analysis evaluating the risk associated with tax forecasts based on various economic scenarios that might impact the amount of actual development realized in the EIFD.

It should be noted that most of the points to be included in the fiscal analysis (numbered points 1-6) are included in the feasibility analysis completed for the preparation of this report.

The Policy Manual states that, "Where appropriate, the County may require reimbursement from the proposing entity for the cost of conducting the fiscal analysis." Harris estimates that this analysis would cost approximately $20,000 to complete with a 2 -month timeframe for completion. This estimate is provided with the understanding that most of the required analysis that is already completed in this report will likely need to be updated with the most current data and assessed values. This estimate also includes the caveat that the fiscal analysis is to be conducted by the CEO, not the City or any City -appointed consultants. The cost and duration of the analysis will ultimately be determined by the CEO. 8

Page 12 of 30 ends

Section 3 Tax Increment Projection Analysis

3.1 Assumptions
TIF freezes the property tax revenues for participating taxing entities that flow from a designated area to a city, county, and other taxing entities at a base level for the year the EIFD is adopted. Any additional, incremental tax revenue to participating taxing entities in future years is diverted into a separate pool of funds that can pay for improvements to an EIFD area or pay back bonds issued against anticipated TIF revenue. In the case of the proposed Downtown Bellflower EIFD, the goal is to raise funds for infrastructure costs relating to development that will take place within the EIFD Area due to the proposed Metro line station.

As mentioned previously and shown in Figure 1: EIFD Area on page 5, portions of the EIFD Area are located within the City's former RDA. This is the only former redevelopment area in the City. GC Section 53398.75 states that "where any district boundaries overlap with the boundaries of any former redevelopment project area, any debt or obligation of a district shall be subordinate to any and all enforceable obligations of the former redevelopment agency, as approved by the Oversight Board and the Department of Finance."
Harris prepared the Downtown Bellflower EIFD tax increment projections ("TIPs") analysis using the assumptions described in Sections 3.1.1 and 3.1.2.

3.1.1 Base Assumptions (Non -RDA EIFD Area and RDA EIFD Area) The assumptions outlined in this section apply to the entire EIFD Area. • EIFD Assessed Value: The assessed valuation of the parcels found within the EIFD Area was provided by the City on July 14, 2023, and is based on the County Assessor's equalized assessment roll.
• Growth Rate: Harris assumes that assessed values will increase by 2% each year through Fiscal Year ("FY") 2052-53 for a period of 45 years, starting in FY 2023-24. This is consistent with the provisions of Proposition 13.
• Tax Rates: Harris used FY 2022-23 Tax Rate Area ("TRA") data from the County for the TRAs found within the EIFD Area. The TRAs within the EIFD Area are as follows:
o 02254
o 02263
o 02267
o 02273
o 02277
o 02335
9

Page 13 of 30 ends

o 02336
o 02375
o 11274
• A 1% tax rate is assessed on all property taxes as established by Proposition 13 (1978). This 1% is divided between the City, County, special districts, and school districts - the individual shares of each taxing entity can vary by TRA. Table 2: 1% Tax Shares Breakdown displays the average share that goes to each taxing entity (City, County, special districts, and school districts) in the TRAs that make up the EIFD Area.

Table 2: 1% Tax Shares Breakdown
Taxing Entity
Groups
Taxing Entities
Average 1% Tax Share
(From EIFD Area TRAs)
City
City -Bellflower TD#1

0.06662%

0.06666°A
City -Bellflower Vehicle PD#1

0.00004%
County
County Sanitation District No 2 Op

0.01341%

0.48341%
Consolidated Fire Project District of LA Co

0.17639%
Greater LA Co Vector Control

0.00038%
LAC Fire-FFW

0.00735%
LA County Library

0.02354%
LA County Accum Cap Outlay

0.00011%
LA Co Flood Control Direct Impact District Maintenance

0.00175%
LA Co Flood Control Maint

0.00991%
Los Angeles County General

0.25058%
School
Bellflower Unified School District

0.20932%

0.44975%
Cerritos Community College District

0.02551%
Children's Instil Tuition Fund

0.00282%
County School Service Fund - Bellflower

0.00754%
County School Services

0.00142%
Educational Augmentation Fund Impound

0.13434%
Educational Rev Augmentation Fund

0.06880%
Special
District
Little Lake Cemetery District

0.000002%

0.00018%
Water Replenishment District of SoCal

0.00018%
Total

1.00000%

1.00000%
Source: Los Angeles County Auditor -Controller
As shown in Table 2: 1% Tax Shares Breakdown, the average City and County 1% tax share within the EIFD Area are 0.06666% and 0.48341%, respectively. • Added Value (new development): The TIPs include a calculation of additional assessed value from anticipated new commercial and residential development in the EIFD Area due to the planned Metro line station, including sites identified in the City's 6th Cycle Housing Element Update ("HEU").
10

Page 14 of 30 ends

The HEU identifies opportunity areas or groups of parcels that the City deems as potential locations for future housing development ("Opportunity Areas") and assigns a number of units projected to be built on those areas during the next planning period (2021-2029). More specifically, the HEU plans for the development of 2,786 units on seven Opportunity Areas within the EIFD Area. Table 3: EIFD Area Projected Units details the Opportunity Areas within the EIFD Area and the number of units expected to be developed at those locations. The table also breaks down the number of units projected to be developed within the Non -RDA EIFD Area and the RDA EIFD Area. The methodology behind these projections is shown in Table 5: RDA EIFD Area Projected Units on page 14 of this study. It should be noted that the HEU did not identify existing entitled or proposed projects for any Opportunity Areas within the EIFD Area.

All the units in Table 3: EIFD Area Projected Units are associated with HEU Opportunity Areas.

Table 3: EIFD Area Projected Units
EIFD Area
Opportunity
Areas
# of Units Projected
Non -RDA
EIFD Area

RDA EIFD
Area
Total
Area 2
42 0
42 Area 3
31 0
31 Area 5
724
576
1,300
Area 6
0 729
729
Area 7
30 271
301
Area 11
112
199
311
Area 12
72 0
72 Total
1,011
1,775
2,786
50%
505
888
1,393
Units developed
per year over 10
years
51 89
139
Source: City of Bellflower 6th Cycle Housing Element Update The TIPs assume that 50% of the 2,786 units will be developed over ten years with the development beginning in FY 2025-26 due to the impending Metro line station. This translates to approximately 139 units built per year over the ten-year period. This conservative assumption is due to the current high interest rates that are impacting residential and commercial development.

Assumptions for commercial development within the EIFD Area were made as well. Table 4:

EIFD Area Commercial Projections displays the assumptions for commercial development within the Non -RDA EIFD Area, the RDA EIFD Area, and the total EIFD Area. The methodology behind these projections is shown in Table 6: RDA EIFD Area Commercial Projection on page 14 of this study.
11

Page 15 of 30 ends

Table 4: EIFD Area Commercial Projections
Sq. Ft. of Commercial Development Projected
Non RDA EIFD Area
RDA EIFD Area
Total
Total
109,585
90,415
200,000
Sq. ft. per year
over 15 years
7,306
6,028
13,333
Source: Downtown Bellflower Transit Oriented Development Specific Plan An assumption of 200,000 square feet ("sq. ft.") of additional commercial development due to the Metro line station was made based on expected development within the EIFD Area using the City's TODSP. This 200,000 sq. ft. is projected to be developed over 15 years beginning in FY 2028-29 which will hopefully coincide with the completion of the Metro line station. The assumption of 200,000 sq. ft. of commercial development over 15 years yields 13,333 sq. ft. of added commercial space per year over that period.

Harris then utilized CoStar, a market data tool, to complete market research on the value of similar developments around Bellflower. More specifically, CoStar was used to identify sales over the last 3 years3 within a ten -mile radius of Bellflower:
• Commercial sales (excluding the city of Long Beach)
• Multifamily sales (excluding the cities of Long Beach and Whittier) for properties built in 2020 or later with ten units or more.

The average price per residential unit and sq. ft. of commercial development were calculated utilizing the comparable sales. The results of these analyses yield a residential per unit value of $581,425 and a commercial per sq. ft. value of $2,066 in 2023 dollars.

An annual inflation factor of 4% was applied to the per unit value for residential development as a conservative assumption based on the growth of median home values in the City over the last five years. According to Zillow, an online real estate data source, the average annual percent change in home value over the last five years is 7.36%, but a more conservative 4% inflation factor was used due to the recent downward trend of home value growth due to high interest rates.

The increase in median home values in the City between September 2022 to September 2023 was just 0.76%.

For commercial development, CoStar was, again, utilized to calculate average market pricing trends over the last seven years yielding an average growth of 3.79% since 2017.

The added assessed value estimates for the EIFD Area are as follows in 2023 dollars:
3 As of August 2023.
12

Page 16 of 30 ends

o Residential — 1,393 units (50% of the 2,786 units identified in the HEU within the EIFD Area) at $581,425 per unit with a 4% inflation factor (Zillow). The development is projected to begin in FY 2025-26 and be developed over ten years. o Commercial — 200,000 sq. ft. of development at $2,066 per sq. ft. (CoStar) with a 3.79% inflation factor (CoStar). The development is projected to begin in FY 2028-29 and be developed over 15 years.

3.1.2 RDA EIFD Area Assumptions (EIFD Area Within RDA Only) Assumptions for the area within the RDA EIFD Area are described in this section. These assumptions only apply to this area until FY 2033-34 when the RDA's enforceable obligations end according to the City's last and final Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule ("ROPS"). It is important to note that property taxes are treated differently in the RDA area due to redevelopment dissolution requirements.

The tax increment generated in the RDA must first be applied to enforceable obligations before it can flow for a potential EIFD. Therefore, the tax increment in the RDA EIFD Area is calculated using modified assumptions until FY 2033-34.
• RDA EIFD Area Value: The assessed valuation of the parcels within the EIFD Area was provided by the City on July 14, 2023, based on the County Assessor's equalized assessment roll. The RDA EIFD Area's value is a portion of the EIFD Area's total valuation. • Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund ("RPTTF") Distributions: RPTTF distribution projections are based upon actual calendar year 20234 distributions for administration, negotiated pass -through payments, and statutory pass -through payments, as shown on the RPTTF reports prepared by the County Auditor -Controller's office. The ratio of the actual calendar year 2023 distributions as compared to gross RPTTF was calculated and applied to the annual TIPs. • Enforceable Obligations: All future enforceable obligations are projected per the City's last and final ROPS, which shows obligations ending in FY 2033-34. • RDA EIFD Area Added Value (new development): A portion of residential and commercial added value is expected to take place within the RDA EIFD Area and should be applied to the TIPs as such.

Of the seven HEU Opportunity Areas projected to be developed within the EIFD Area, four are at least partially within the RDA EIFD Area. For the RDA EIFD Area TIPs, the percentage of the Opportunity Areas' acreage within the RDA EIFD Area applied to the total number of projected units on each Opportunity Area yields the number of units projected for the RDA EIFD Area. The Opportunity Areas in question and the unit projection methodology are described as follows in Table 5: RDA EIFD Area Projected Units.
4 Calendar year 2023 includes ROPS periods 22-23B and 23-24A. 13

Page 17 of 30 ends

Table 5: RDA EIFD Area Projected Units
HEU Opportunity
Area
# of
Units
Total
Acerage
Acrage within
RDA TRAs
% Area within
RDA EIFD Area

RDA EIFD
Area Units
5 1,300

18.10 8.02

44.32%
576
6 729

4.04 4.04
100.00%
729
7 301

12.49 11.24

90.06%
271
11 311

7.21 4.61

63.95%
199
Total
1,775
50%
888
Units developed
per year over 10
years
89 It is important to note that the 1,775 units projected by the HEU to be developed within the RDA EIFD Area are a portion of the 2,786 units projected for the entire EIFD Area. See Table 3: EIFD Area Projected Units on page 11 for a breakdown of the projected units across the EIFD Area.

The RDA EIFD Area TIPs assume that 50% of the HEU units, or 888 units, will be developed over ten years beginning in FY 2025-26 due to the impending Metro line station. This equates to 89 units developed per year over that period within the RDA EIFD Area. The separate calculation for the RDA EIFD Area in the TIPs ends in FY 2033-34 when the enforceable obligations of the RDA cease.

The precise location of commercial development within the TODSP is not identified in the specific plan document, but it is assumed to be surrounding the Metro line station area as a part of mixed -use, transit -oriented development. Therefore, the ratio of commercially zoned acres found in the RDA EIFD Area to the commercially zoned acres within the entire EIFD Area is used to project the amount of projected commercial development taking place within the RDA EIFD Area. More specifically, 39 of the 87 acres of total commercially zoned acres in the EIFD Area are within the RDA EIFD Area, or 45% of the total acres. When applying this percentage to the total 200,000 sq. ft. of projected commercial development, 90,415 sq. ft. is estimated to be developed within the RDA EIFD Area. The methodology breakdown and RDA EIFD Area commercial development projections are detailed in Table 6: RDA EIFD Area Commercial Projection.

Table 6: RDA EIFD Area Commercial Projection
EIFD Area
Total
Commercially
Zoned Acres

RDA EIFD
Area
Commercially
Zoned Acres
% of EIFD Area
Commercially Zoned
Acres within RDA
EIFD Area
Total Sq. Ft. of
Commercial
Development
Projected
Sq. Ft. of Commercial
Development
Projected within RDA
EIFD Area

86.79 39.24

45.21%
200,000
90,415
Sq. ft. per year
over 15 years
6,028
14

Page 18 of 30 ends

The TIPS for the RDA EIFD Area assumes 90,415 sq. ft. of commercial development will be built over 15 years beginning in FY 2028-29, which translates to 6,028 sq. ft. of added commercial development per year. See Table 4: EIFD Area Commercial Projections on page 12 for a breakdown of the commercial projections across the EIFD Area.

To summarize, the assessed value estimates within the RDA EIFD Area are as follows in 2023 dollars. These added values are a portion of the EIFD Area projected added value estimates as seen in Section 3.1.1, but will be applied to the TIPs differently during the periods where the RDA still has enforceable obligations:
o Residential — 888 units (50% of the 1,775 units identified in the HEU within the RDA EIFD Area) at $581,425 per unit with a 4% inflation factor (Zillow). The development is projected to begin in FY 2025-26 and be developed over ten years. o Commercial — 90,415 sq. ft. of development at $2,066 per sq. ft. (CoStar) with a 3.79% inflation factor (CoStar). The development is projected to begin in FY 2028-29 and be developed over 15 years.

Note that with the RDA dissolving in FY 2033-34, one year of the projected residential development and nine years of the projected commercial development will take place outside of the separate RDA EIFD Area TIPs. However, the per unit, sq. ft., and inflation assumptions will stay the same as the entire EIFD area will be projected as one area for the remainder of the 45 - year TIPs.

3.2 Tax Increment Projection Methodology
The TIPs for the EIFD Area, prepared using the assumptions detailed in the previous sections, show the City contributing 100% of its tax increment towards the EIFD. However, the TIPs include the County only matching the City's contribution pursuant to the following County minimum requirements for EIFD participation outlined in Policy Manual requirements No. 1 and 2:

1. The City's contribution of property tax increment must be at least equal to that contributed by the County general fund and its special districts. Examples of County special districts include the Fire District, Flood Control District, and Library Fund.

2. The County must not be required to contribute 100% of its property tax increment.

County participation is crucial to the viability of the EIFD. A housing set aside was also added to the projections to put a good faith effort towards meeting the County's minimum requirement No. 5 as outlined in the Policy Manual.

The TIPs discussion is contained in the following sections:
15

Page 19 of 30 ends

• Section 3.2.1 describes the TIPs for the Non -RDA EIFD Area from FY 2024-25 to FY 2033-34 before the enforceable obligations are retired and the successor agency is formally dissolved. • Section 3.2.2 describes the TIPs for the RDA EIFD Area from FY 2024-25 to FY 2033-34 when enforceable obligations are retired and the successor agency dissolves. • Section 3.2.3 describes the TIPs for the total EIFD Area from FY 2034-35 to FY 2068-69, after the successor agency dissolution for the remainder of the 45 -year projection.

The complete 45 -year TIPs are provided in Appendix A.

3.2.1 Non -RDA EIFD Area - Before Successor Agency Dissolution Table 7: Non -RDA EIFD Area Pre -Successor Agency Dissolution TIPs shows the projection of EIFD revenue generated within the EIFD Area that is outside of the RDA EIFD Area through FY 2033-34 when the successor agency will formally dissolve. This section utilizes the base assumptions found in Section 3.1.1 for the Non -RDA EIFD Area as displayed in Table 3: EIFD Area Projected Units and Table 4: EIFD Area Commercial Projections which are both on page 12. Once the obligations are fully paid, the tax increment for the entire EIFD Area (without separating the RDA EIFD Area from the Non - RDA EIFD Area) will be calculated in a consistent manner, as shown in Table 10: Total EIFD Area Post -Successor Agency Dissolution TIPs on page 19.

Table 7: Non -RDA EIFD Area Pre -Successor Agency Dissolution TIPs -
Non -RDA EIFD Area Pre -Successor Agency Dissolution 11 Total Assessed Value
EIFD Revenue
Fiscal
Year
Total Assessed
EIFD Value not
within RDA
EIFD Area
Added Value
Incremental
Value
City
County
(Matching
per Policy
Manual)
Total County
Revenue
County
share if
matching
City
Housing
Set Aside
25%
Total
100%
Matching
23-24
712,159,635
-
-
-
24-25
726,402,828
-
-
-
-
-

0.00%
-
-
25-26
740,930,884
31,784,963
28,771,249
19,180
19,180
139,084

13.79%
9,590
28,770
26-27
787,534,465
33,056,361
75,374,830
50,247
50,247
364,372

13.79%
25,123
75,370
27-28
836,341,515
34,378,616
124,181,880
82,783
82,783
600,312

13.79%
41,392
124,175
28-29
887,446,961
53,936,449
175,287,326
116,851
116,851
847,362

13.79%
58,426
175,277
29-30
959,132,349
56,055,863
246,972,714
164,639
164,639
1,193,899

13.79%
82,319
246,958
30-31
1,034,370,859
58,258,611
322,211,224
214,795
214,795
1,557,612

13.79%
107,397
322,192
31-32
1,113,316,887
60,547,973
401,157,252
267,423
267,423
1,939,248

13.79%
133,711
401,134
32-33
1,196,131,197
62,927,355
483,971,562
322,629
322,629
2,339,583

13.79%
161,314
483,943
33-34
1,282,981,176
65,400,300
570,821,541
380,525
_ 380,525
2,759,427

13.79%
190,263
570,788
Total: 456,346,490 2,428,608
16

Page 20 of 30 ends

Before the RDA's enforceable obligations are fully paid, the EIFD Area outside the RDA EIFD Area is projected to generate $2,428,608 of revenue with $456,346,490 of value being added to the area on top of the base 2% growth rate.

3.2.2 RDA EIFD Area Pre -Successor Agency Dissolution
Because the RDA EIFD Area is a portion of the former RDA, the associated value is subject to the RPTTF tax increment distribution process per GC Section 53398.75. There are multiple potential methodologies possible to project the revenue from the RDA EIFD Area specifically. The total EIFD revenue to the City is ultimately determined by the County in its calculations at the formation of the EIFD. The County does have EIFDs that contain portions or entire former RDAs, however, their specific methodology is not publicly available. Harris did reach out to the County for an explanation of their methodology but has not heard back as of the preparation of this study.

The approach used to complete the TIPs for the RDA EIFD Area takes into consideration that the pass - through payments and enforceable obligations could grow to the point where RPTTF generated by the RDA EIFD Area increment and its added value is needed to fulfill those obligations5. This approach calculates the RDA EIFD Area's City share to the EIFD by projecting the total gross RPTTF generated by the RDA with the projected added value, and projecting its distributions (including administration, negotiated pass-throughs, statutory pass-throughs, and enforceable obligations). Then, the percentage of total RDA value within the RDA EIFD Area is applied to the total excess revenue with the City's tax share of that portion of excess revenue becoming the City's share of EIFD revenue. Table 8: RDA EIFD Area Pre -Successor Agency Dissolution City Share Calculation calculates the City's share of excess revenue for the EIFD as the percentage of the RDA EIFD Area's projected value within the RDA.

Table 8: RDA EIFD Area Pre -Successor Agency Dissolution City Share Calculation RPTTF Share of the EIFD Area Portion of Total Excess Revenue Fiscal
Year
Total RDA
Assessed Value
(Including
Added Value)
Total Incremental
Value from RDA
Base Year
Total Gross
RPTTF
Total
Admin
Negotiated
Pass -Through
Payments
Statutory Pass
Through
Payments
Approved
Enforceable
Obligations
(via L&F)
Total Excess
Revenue
Percentage
of Value in
Overlap
Area
EIFD Area
Portion of Total
Excess Revenue
City Share
of Excess
Revenue
23-24
831,079,990
-
24-25
847,701,590
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0%
-
-
25-26
864,655,622
665,157,351
6,651,574
(102,945)
(168,749)
(1,239,714)
(2,254,797)
2,885,369
21%
594,538
39,634
26-27
937,765,264
738,266,993
7,382,670
(114,260)
(187,296)
(1,375,975)
(2,345,397)
3,359,742
25%
851,053
56,734
27-28
1,014,569,760
815,071,489
8,150,715
(126,147)
(206,781)
(1,519,123)
(2,438,817)
3,859,847
30%
1,142,636
76,171
28-29
1,095,232,314
895,734,043
8,957,340
(138,631)
(227,245)
(1,669,461)
(2,537,666)
4,384,338
33%
1,468,031
97,863
29-30
1,194,924,814
995,426,543
9,954,265
(154,060)
(252,537)
(1,855,267)
(2,640,897)
5,051,505
38%
1,910,159
127,336
30-31
1,299,691,289
1,100,193,018
11,001,930
(170,274)
(279,116)
(2,050,529)
(2,748,308)
5,753,703
42%
2,398,313
159,878
31-32
1,409,755,235
1,210,256,964
12,102,570
(187,308)
(307,039)
(2,255,666)
(1,293,548)
8,059,009
45%
3,639,502
242,619
32-33
1,525,349,450
1,325,851,179
13,258,512
(205,199)
(336,365)
(2,471,109)
(1,110,962)
9,134,877
48%
4,412,404
294,143
33-34
1,646,716,419
1,447,218,148
14,472,181
(223,982)
(367,155)
(2,697,312)
(73,650)
11,110,082
51%
5,683,396
378,871
Total 1,473,249
5 GC Section 53398.75 explains, "where any district boundaries overlap with the boundaries of any former redevelopment project area, any debt or obligation of a district shall be subordinate to any and all enforceable obligations of the former redevelopment agency, as approved by the Oversight Board and the Department of Finance."
17

Page 21 of 30 ends

This approach yields $1,473,249 of City share for the EIFD within the RDA EIFD Area during the periods the RDA still has enforceable obligations.

For the EIFD 45 -year TIPs, with the County still matching the City's EIFD contribution and the 25% housing set aside being factored in, this approach yields $2,209,874 of EIFD revenue from the RDA EIFD Area for the periods the RDA still has enforceable obligations. Table 9: RDA EIFD Area Pre - Successor Agency Dissolution TIPs breaks down this figure.

Table 9: RDA EIFD Area Pre -Successor Agency Dissolution TIPs RDA EIFD Area Pre -Successor Agency Dissolution
Total Assessed Value
EIFD Revenue
Fiscal
Year
Total Assessed
EIFD Value
within Former
RDA
Added Value
Incremental
Value
City Revenue
County
Revenue
Housing
Set Aside
25%
Total
100%
Matching
23-24
171,246,203
-
24-25
174,671,127
-
-
-
-
-
-
25-26
178,164,550
55,816,530
6,918,347
39,634
39,634
19,817
59,450
26-27
237,544,371
58,049,191
66,298,168
56,734
56,734
28,367
85,100
27-28
300,344,449
60,371,159
129,098,246
76,171
76,171
38,086
114,257
28-29
366,722,497
77,787,853
195,476,294
97,863
97,863
48,932
146,795
29-30
451,844,800
80,867,979
280,598,597
127,336
127,336
63,668
191,005
30-31
541,749,675
84,070,120
370,503,472
159,878
159,878
79,939
239,817
31-32
636,654,788
87,399,111
465,408,585
242,619
242,619
121,310
363,929
32-33
736,786,995
90,859,980
565,540,792
294,143
294,143
147,072
441,215
33-34
842,382,715
94,457,954
671,136,512
378,871
378,871
189,435
568,306
Total: 689,679,876 2,209,874

3.2.3 Total EIFD Area Post -Successor Agency Dissolution Table 10: Total EIFD Area Post -Successor Agency Dissolution TIPs includes the projections for FY 2034-35 to FY 2068-69 after the formal dissolution of the successor agency and that the tax increment for the entire EIFD is calculated in the same way due to retirement of enforceable obligations for the RDA area.
18

Page 22 of 30 ends

Table 10: Total EIFD Area Post -Successor Agency Dissolution TIPs Total EIFD Area Post Successor Agency Dissolution
EIFD Revenue
Fiscal
Year
City
County
Total
100%
Matching
34-35
962,826
962,826
1,444,239
35-36
1,104,634
1,104,634
1,656,950
36-37
1,167,208
1,167,208
1,750,811
37-38
1,232,121
1,232,121
1,848,182
38-39
1,299,462
1,299,462
1,949,193
39-40
1,369,322
1,369,322
2,053,983
40-41
1,441,796
1,441,796
2,162,694
41-42
1,516,982
1,516,982
2,275,473
42-43
1,594,982
1,594,982
2,392,473
43-44
1,675,902
1,675,902
2,513,854
44-45
1,721,199
1,721,199
2,581,798
45-46
1,767,401
1,767,401
2,651,101
46-47
1,814,527
1,814,527
2,721,790
47-48
1,862,595
1,862,595
2,793,893
48-49
1,911,625
1,911,625
2,867,438
49-50
1,961,636
1,961,636
2,942,454
50-51
2,012,647
2,012,647
3,018,970
51-52
2,064,678
2,064,678
3,097,016
52-53
2,117,749
2,117,749
3,176,624
53-54
2,171,882
2,171,882
3,257,823
54-55
2,227,098
2,227,098
3,340,647
55-56
2,283,418
2,283,418
3,425,127
56-57
2,340,864
2,340,864
3,511,296
57-58
2,399,460
2,399,460
3,599,189
58-59
2,459,227
2,459,227
3,688,840
59-60
2,520,189
2,520,189
3,780,284
60-61
2,582,371
2,582,371
3,873,557
61-62
2,645,797
2,645,797
3,968,695
62-63
2,710,491
2,710,491
4,065,736
63-64
2,776,479
2,776,479
4,164,718
64-65
2,843,786
2,843,786
4,265,679
65-66
2,912,440
2,912,440
4,368,660
66-67
2,982,467
2,982,467
4,473,700
67-68
3,053,894
3,053,894
4,580,842
68-69
3,126,750
3,126,750
4,690,125
108,953,855
19

Page 23 of 30 ends

A total of $108,953,855 of EIFD revenue is projected to be generated by the entire EIFD Area after the RDA's enforceable obligations are fully paid.

3.2.4 Tax Increment Projection Summary
Table 11: EIFD Revenue Summary breaks down the revenue that is projected to be collected by the EIFD over the 45 -year TIPs.

Table 11: EIFD Revenue Summary
Non -RDA
EIFD Area
Revenue

RDA EIFD
Area
Revenue
EIFD Area
Revenue
GRAND
TOTAL
Pre -Successor Agency
Dissolution
(FY 2024-25 - FY 2033-34)
2,428,608
2,209,874
4,638,482
Post -Successor Agency
Dissolution
(FY 2035-36 - FY 2068-69)
108,953,855
108,953,855
TOTAL
113,592,337
The total EIFD projected revenue including all three projection sections is as follows:
• Grand Total EIFD Revenue over 45 years - $113,592,337 (the complete 45 -year TIPs can be found in Appendix A at the end of this study)
o Non -RDA EIFD Area Pre -Successor Agency Dissolution - $2,428,608 o RDA EIFD Area Pre -Successor Agency Dissolution - $2,209,874 o Total EIFD Area Post Successor Agency Dissolution - $108,953,855 The projection also shows $1,705,989,581 of assessed value added to the EIFD Area due to growth from the Metro line station over the next 45 years. With the County matching the City's contribution, it should be noted that this would be asking the County to contribute just 13.79% of its total tax increment collected from the EIFD Area. A housing set aside was also added to the projections to put a good faith effort towards meeting the County's minimum requirement No. 5 as outlined in the Policy Manual.

The complete 45 -year TIPs including all the projection sections are available in Appendix A at the end of this study.

3.3 Infrastructure Cost Analysis
Due to the limitations for tax increment revenue given the County's minimum requirements for EIFD participation, only the cost for sewer improvements consistent with the projected development 20

Page 24 of 30 ends

assumptions has been estimated. These assumptions are shown previously in this study and summarized as follows:
• Residential — 1,393 multifamily apartment units total or 139 units per year over ten years. • Commercial — 200,000 sq. ft. of retail development total or 13,333 per year over 15 years.

Table 12: Infrastructure Cost Estimate details a cost estimate for sewer improvement within the EIFD Area prepared by a licensed civil engineer with Harris.

Table 12: Infrastructure Cost Estimate

DOWNTOWN BELLFLOWER
Area Specific Plan
ROUGH COST ESTIMATE (2023$)
for Sewer Improvements
Bid Item List IM ,
Item No.

Item Description
Unit
Estimated
Quantity
Unit Cost
Item Cost
General
1 Mobilization and Demobilization
LS
1 $497,000
$497,000
2 Traffic Control
LS
1 $298,000
$298,000
3 SWPPP
LS
1 $65,000
$65,000
4 Construction Survey
LS
1 $75,000
$75,000
5 Trench Sheeting, Shoring and Bracing
LS
1 $150,000
$150,000
Subtotal: Miscellaneous
$1,085,000
Sanitary Sewer Improvements
6 Remove and Replace Existing 8" SS with 12" SS by Open Trench and Restore Connections LF
8960
$550
$4,928,000
7 Remove and Replace Existing 12" SS with 18" SS by Open Trench and Restore Connections LF
4120
$725
$2,987,000
8 Remove and Replace Existing 15" SS with 24" SS by Open Trench and Restore Connections LF
1600
$900
$1,440,000
9 Remove and Replace Existing SSMH
EA
6 $9,500
$57,000
10 Rehabilitate Existing SSMH
EA
59 $3,500
$206,500
11 Rehabilitate Existing Connection to Trunk Sewer
EA
3 $5,500
$16,500
Subtotal: SS Improvements
$9,635,000
Construction Contingency (20%)
$2,144,000
Construction Total
$12,864,000
Planning, Environmental and Engineering (15%)
$1,929,600
Inspection and Construction Management (15%)
$1,929,600
Other Soft Cost (5%)
$643,200
Project Total
*round up to the nearest thousand
$17,367,000
The total estimated cost for sewer improvements in the EIFD Area total $17,367,000 in 2023 dollars.

The 2023 dollars note is significant as, like the value of the EIFD Area, the cost of the sewer improvements will be subject to inflationary forces throughout the TIPs period. While the TIPs project the EIFD to generate $113,592,337 of revenue over 45 years, the estimated improvement cost of $17,367,000 set at a year -over -year inflation rate of 4% (similar to the inflation rates of the added value) for the same 45 -year period values the improvements at $101,443,698. This means that the estimated sewer improvement cost after 45 years will be nearly $12 million less than the sum of all EIFD revenue over the 45 -year period after tax increment will start to be collected. 21

Page 25 of 30 ends

It should be stated, however, that the sewer system that serves the EIFD Area is owned by the County.

The partnership between the City and County to do the improvements may justify a larger portion of County participation in the EIFD as the County -owned infrastructure will be upgraded by the EIFD.

3.4 Additional Potential Costs to the City
Coordination with the County to garner their participation in the EIFD as well as the formation procedures of the EIFD will add additional potential costs to the City.

As discussed in Section 2.1.1 County Benefit Fiscal Analysis, the County will conduct a fiscal analysis to determine the benefit of the EIFD to the County and other participating taxing entities. The Policy Manual states the following:
"Where appropriate, the County may require reimbursement from the proposing entity for the cost of conducting the fiscal analysis."
Harris estimates the fiscal analysis cost at approximately $20,000 with a 2 -month timeframe for the completion of the fiscal analysis. However, per the Policy Manual, the fiscal analysis is to be conducted by the CEO, not the City or any City -appointed consultants. The cost and duration of the analysis will ultimately be determined by the CEO.

The formation of the EIFD would also be a significant cost to the City if the EIFD moves forward.

Additional steps to form the EIFD include, but are not limited to, the following according to Senate Bill 628 and identified best practices6:

1. Conducting Outreach
a. Outreach should include elected officials, affected residents, and property owners.

Participating taxing entities should already be on board before formation steps are taken.

2. Establishing a Public Financing Authority
a. This includes drafting and adopting a resolution of intention to establish the proposed EIFD.

3. Preparing an Infrastructure Financing Plan ("IFP") including:
a. A map and legal description of the proposed EIFD;
b. A description of the public facilities and other forms of development for financial assistance that is proposed within the EIFD; and
c. A financing section that:
6 How to create an EIFD. California Association for Local Economic Development (CALED). (2022, August 4). https://caled.org/how-to-create-an-eifd/ 22

Page 26 of 30 ends

i. Specifies the maximum amount of incremental tax revenues each participating entity proposes to dedicate to the EIFD.
ii. Revenue projections.
iii. A plan for financing public facilities.
iv. A limit on the total revenues that may be allocated to the EIFD. v. A date on which the district will cease to exist and when tax allocations to the district will end, which can be up to 45 years from the approval data for issuing EIFD bonds of providing an EIFD loan.
vi. Fiscal analysis of potential impacts on the city of county and other taxing entities.

4. Public Hearings and Protest Proceedings
a. This includes the distribution of the IFP to all affected taxing entities and property owners and providing notices to of the public hearings and meetings.

5. Approval and Formation
Harris estimates that the formation process would be an additional cost to the City of $90,000 to $110,000 with the process taking 12 to 18 months to complete.
23

Page 27 of 30 ends

Section 4 Conclusion
The analysis of eligibility and feasibility of the potential Downtown Bellflower EIFD Area indicates the following:
• The proposed EIFD meets just four of the seven minimum requirements (Policy Manual requirements No. 2, 3, 5, and 7) for County participation.
o Policy Manual requirement No. 1 seems very unlikely for the City to remedy. o County participation is vital to the financial feasibility of the EIFD. Without County participation, the City would only receive its own share of tax increment revenue which would be equal to the City's share without the EIFD in place. Additionally, the City's share would be insufficient to fund the needed sewer improvements.
• The amount of tax revenue generated under the County's Policy for EIFD participation would be insufficient to fund the sewer improvements needed to allow for additional development capacity. o Should the County be willing to veer from its policy requirements and be willing to contribute

13.79% of its tax increment, the EIFD would generate an estimated $113,592,337 in projected tax increment revenue over 45 years. The cost of needed sewer improvements is estimated at $17,367,000 in 2023 dollars. This amount with inflation applied over the same 45 -year period grows to $101,443,698.

Given the results of the analysis, should the City wish to pursue an EIFD for the Transit Oriented Development area around the future Bellflower Light Rail Station, it is recommended that the City consider trying to meet with the County to discuss the possibility of a partnership for the sewer improvements (County owned sewer). This would require policy flexibility on a) the County's minimum requirements on the City's property tax rate (6.67% vs. at least 15%) and b) if, the County can agree to item a), the County's willingness to match the City's increment contribution which would lead to the County contributing 13.79% of its increment as opposed to the City's 100% contribution. 24

Page 28 of 30 ends

Appendix A — Bellflower EIFD 45 -Year Tax Increment Projection 25

Page 29 of 30 ends

No -RDA EIFD Area Pre -Successor Agency Dissolution III RDA EIFD Area Pre -Successor Agency Dissolution Total EIFD Area Post Successor Agency Dissolution
GRAND
TOTAL
Total Assessed Value
EIFD Revenue
Total Assessed Value
EIFD Revenue
Total Assessed Value
EIFD Revenue
-1111
Fiscal
Year
Total Assessed
EIFD Value not
within RDA
FIFDArea
Added Value
Incremental
Value
City
County
(Matching
Manual)
Total County
Revenue
County
share if
matching
City
Housing
Set Aside
SetPolicy
25%
Total
Total Assessed
EIFD Value
within Forma
RDA
Added Value
Incremental
Value
County
City Revenue
County
Revenue
Housing
Set Aside
25%
Total
Total Assessed
EIFD Value not
within Porno
RDA
Added Value
Incremental Value
City
County
Total County
share
County
share if
matching
City
Housing Set
Aside 25%
Total
100%
Matching
100%
Matching
100%
Matching
23-24
712,159,635
-
-
-
171,246,203
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
24-25
726,402,828
-
-
-
-
-

0.00%
-
-
174,671,127
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-

0.00%
-
-
-
25-26
740,930,884
31,784,963
28,771,249
19,180
19,180
139,084

13.79%
9,590
28,770
178,164,550
55,816,530
6,918,347
39,634
39,634
39,634
19,817
59,450
-
-
-
-
-
-

0.00%
-
-
88,220
26-27
787,534,465
33,056,361
75,374,830
50,247
50,247
364,372

13.79%
25,123
75,370
237,544,371
58,049,191
66,298,168
56,734
56,734
56,734
28,367
85,100
-
-
-
-
-
-

0.00%
-
-
160,471
27-28
836,341,515
34,378,616
124,181,880
82,783
82,783
600,312

13.79%
41,392
124,175
300,344,449
60,371,159
129,098,246
76,171
76,171
76,171
38,086
114,257
-
-
-
-
-
-

0.00%
-
-
238,432
28-29
887,446,961
53,936,449
175,287,326
116,851
116,851
847,362

13.79%
58,426
175,277
366,722,497
77,787,853
195,476,294
97,863
97,863
97,863
48,932
146,795
-
-
-
-
-
-

0.00%
-
-
322,072
29-30
959,132,349
56,055,863
246,972,714
164,639
164,639
1,193,899

13.79%
82,319
246,958
451,844,800
80,867,979
280,598,597
127,336
127,336
127,336
63,668
191,005
-
-
-
-
-
-

0.00%
-
-
437,963
30-31
1,034,370,859
58,258,611
322,211,224
214,795
214,795
1,557,612

13.79%
107,397
322,192
541,749,675
84,070,120
370,503,472
159,878
159,878
159,878
79,939
239,817
-
-
-
-
-
-

0.00%
-
-
562,010
31-32
1,113,316,887
60,547,973
401,157,252
267,423
267,423
1,939,248

13.79%
133,711
401,134
636,654,788
87,399,111
465,408,585
242,619
242,619
242,619
121,310
363,929
-
-
-
-
-
-

0.00%
-
-
765,063
32-33
1,196,131,197
62,927,355
483,971,562
322,629
322,629
2,339,583

13.79%
161,314
483,943
736,786,995
90,859,980
565,540,792
294,143
294,143
294,143
147,072
441,215
-
-
-
-
-
-

0.00%
-
-
925,158
33-34
1,282,981,176
65,400,300
570,821,541
380,525
380,525
2,759,427

13.79%
190,263
570,788
842,382,715
94,457,954
671,136,512
378,871
378,871
378,871
189,435
568,306
-
-
-
-
-
-

0.00%
-
-
1,139,095
34-35
-
-
-
-
-
-

0.00%
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0%
-
-
2,327,729,423
166,168,955
1,444,323,585
962,826
962,826
6,982,053

13.79%
481,413
1,444,239
1,444,239
35-36
-
-
-
-
-
-

0.00%
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0%
-
-
2,540,452,966
43,057,305
1,657,047,128
1,104,634
1,104,634
8,010,387

13.79%
552,317
1,656,950
1,656,950
36-37
-
-

0.00%
0%
2,634,319,331
44,689,508
1,750,913,493
1,167,208
1,167,208
8,464,149

13.79%
583,604
1,750,811
1,750,811
37-38
-
-
-
-
-
-

0.00%
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0%
-
-
2,731,695,225
46,383,583
1,848,289,387
1,232,121
1,232,121
8,934,877

13.79%
616,061
1,848,182
1,848,182
38-39
-
-
-
-
-
-

0.00%
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0%
-
-
2,832,712,713
48,141,877
1,949,306,875
1,299,462
1,299,462
9,423,209

13.79%
649,731
1,949,193
1,949,193
39-40
-
-
-
-
-
-

0.00%
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0%
-
-
2,937,508,845
49,966,824
2,054,103,007
1,369,322
1,369,322
9,929,808

13.79%
684,661
2,053,983
2,053,983
40-41
-
-
-
-
-
-

0.00%
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0%
-
-
3,046,225,846
51,860,951
2,162,820,008
1,441,796
1,441,796
10,455,360

13.79%
720,898
2,162,694
2,162,694
41-42
-
-
-
-
-
-

0.00%
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0%
-
-
3,159,011,314
53,826,879
2,275,605,476
1,516,982
1,516,982
11,000,580

13.79%
758,491
2,275,473
2,275,473
42-43
-
-
-
-
-
-

0.00%
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0%
-
-
3,276,018,419
55,867,332
2,392,612,581
1,594,982
1,594,982
11,566,208

13.79%
797,491
2,392,473
2,392,473
43-44
-
-
-
-
-
-

0.00%
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0%
-
-
3,397,406,119
-
2,514,000,281
1,675,902
1,675,902
12,153,012

13.79%
837,951
2,513,854
2,513,854
44-45
-
-
-
-
-
-

0.00%
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0%
-
-
3,465,354,242
-
2,581,948,404
1,721,199
1,721,199
12,481,483

13.79%
860,599
2,581,798
2,581,798
45-46
-
-
-
-
-
-

0.00%
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0%
-
-
3,534,661,327
-
2,651,255,489
1,767,401
1,767,401
12,816,522

13.79%
883,700
2,651,101
2,651,101
46-47
-
-
-
-
-
-

0.00%
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0%
-
-
3,605,354,553
-
2,721,948,715
1,814,527
1,814,527
13,158,263

13.79%
907,263
2,721,790
2,721,790
47-48
-
-
-
-
-
-

0.00%
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0%
-
-
3,677,461,644
-
2,794,055,806
1,862,595
1,862,595
13,506,838

13.79%
931,298
2,793,893
2,793,893
48-49
-
-
-
-
-
-

0.00%
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0%
-
-
3,751,010,877
-
2,867,605,039
1,911,625
1,911,625
13,862,385

13.79%
955,813
2,867,438
2,867,438
49-50
-
-
-
-
-
-

0.00%
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0%
-
-
3,826,031,095
-
2,942,625,257
1,961,636
1,961,636
14,225,042

13.79%
980,818
2,942,454
2,942,454
50-51
-
-
-
-
-
-

0.00%
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0%
-
-
3,902,551,716
-
3,019,145,878
2,012,647
2,012,647
14,594,953

13.79%
1,006,323
3,018,970
3,018,970
51-52
-
-
-
-
-
-

0.00%
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0%
-
-
3,980,602,751
-
3,097,196,913
2,064,678
2,064,678
14,972,262

13.79%
1,032,339
3,097,016
3,097,016
52-53
-
-
-
-
-
-

0.00%
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0%
-
-
4,060,214,806
-
3,176,808,968
2,117,749
2,117,749
15,357,118

13.79%
1,058,875
3,176,624
3,176,624
53-54
-
-
-
-
-
-

0.00%
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0%
-
-
4,141,419,102
-
3,258,013,264
2,171,882
2,171,882
15,749,670

13.79%
1,085,941
3,257,823
3,257,823
54-55
-
-
-
-
-
-

0.00%
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0%
-
-
4,224,247,484
-
3,340,841,646
2,227,098
2,227,098
16,150,074

13.79%
1,113,549
3,340,647
3,340,647
55-56
-
-
-
-
-
-

0.00%
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0%
-
-
4,308,732,434
-
3,425,326,596
2,283,418
2,283,418
16,558,485

13.79%
1,141,709
3,425,127
3,425,127
56-57
-
-
-
-
-
-

0.00%
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0%
-
-
4,394,907,082
-
3,511,501,244
2,340,864
2,340,864
16,975,065

13.79%
1,170,432
3,511,296
3,511,296
57-58
-
-
-
-
-
-

0.00%
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0%
-
-
4,482,805,224
-
3,599,399,386
2,399,460
2,399,460
17,399,976

13.79%
1,199,730
3,599,189
3,599,189
58-59
-
-
-
-
-
-

0.00%
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0%
-
-
4,572,461,328
-
3,689,055,490
2,459,227
2,459,227
17,833,386

13.79%
1,229,613
3,688,840
3,688,840
59-60
-
-
-
-
-
-

0.00%
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0%
-
-
4,663,910,555
-
3,780,504,717
2,520,189
2,520,189
18,275,463

13.79%
1,260,095
3,780,284
3,780,284
60-61
-
-
-
-
-
-

0.00%
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0%
-
-
4,757,188,766
-
3,873,782,928
2,582,371
2,582,371
18,726,383

13.79%
1,291,186
3,873,557
3,873,557
61-62
-
-
-
-
-
-

0.00%
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0%
-
-
4,852,332,541
-
3,968,926,703
2,645,797
2,645,797
19,186,320

13.79%
1,322,898
3,968,695
3,968,695
62-63
-
-
-
-
-
-

0.00%
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0%
-
-
4,949,379,192
-
4,065,973,354
2,710,491
2,710,491
19,655,457

13.79%
1,355,245
4,065,736
4,065,736
63-64
-
-
-
-
-
-

0.00%
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0%
-
-
5,048,366,776
-
4,164,960,938
2,776,479
2,776,479
20,133,976

13.79%
1,388,239
4,164,718
4,164,718
64-65
-
-
-
-
-
-

0.00%
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0%
-
-
5,149,334,112
-
4,265,928,274
2,843,786
2,843,786
20,622,066

13.79%
1,421,893
4,265,679
4,265,679
65-66
-
-
-
-
-
-

0.00%
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0%
-
-
5,252,320,794
-
4,368,914,956
2,912,440
2,912,440
21,119,917

13.79%
1,456,220
4,368,660
4,368,660
66-67
-
-
-
-
-
-

0.00%
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0%
-
-
5,357,367,210
-
4,473,961,372
2,982,467
2,982,467
21,627,725

13.79%
1,491,233
4,473,700
4,473,700
67-68
-
-
-
-
-
-

0.00%
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0%
5,464,514,554
-
4,581,108,716
3,053,894
3,053,894
22,145,690

13.79%
1,526,947
4,580,842
4,580,842
68-69
-
-
-
-
-
-

0.00%
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0%
-
-
5,573,804,845
-
4,690,399,007
3,126,750
3,126,750
22,674,014

13.79%
1,563,375
4,690,125
4,690,125
Total: 456,346,490 2,428,608
Total: 689,679,876 2,209,874
Total: 559,963,215 108,953,855
113,592,337
23

Page 30 of 30 ends

BE
cv LLFLow-4
'CROWING TOGS'
staqp0 14-G
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
ATTENTION: Ryan Smoot, City Manager
FROM: Len Gorecki, Assistant City Manager/Director of Public Works Jerry Stock, City Engineer
SUBJECT:

Consideration and possible action to authorize the Director of Public Works, or designee, to install time -based parking restrictions in the 8800 block of Palm Street (C.E.# 24-04).

DATE: May 13, 2024

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This action would approve and authorize the installation of time -based parking restrictions in the 8800 block of Palm Street pursuant to Bellflower Municipal Code ("BMC") Chapter 10.04.

RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL
1) Authorize the Director of Public Works, or designee, to install the time -based parking restrictions in the 8800 block of Palm Street; or
2) Alternatively, discuss and take other action related to this item.

FISCAL IMPACT
The estimated cost to install the time -based parking restrictions is $300. Funds are budgeted in Account Nos. 010-43170-3100 (Street Maintenance Traffic Paint) and 010-43180-3100 (Street Maintenance Street Signs).

DISCUSSION
The City received a request from the Facilities and Safety Manager of Habitat for Humanity of Greater Los Angeles (Habitat for Humanity) to extend the existing red curb parking restrictions an additional 40 feet on the north side of the street in the 8800 block of Palm Street. The City Engineer spoke with Habitat for Humanity's Facilities and Safety Manager to better understand their needs. The basis of the request is to improve access to their loading/unloading dock area at the rear of their property on Palm Street.

Currently, vehicles parked in that area impede semi -trucks from safely entering and exiting the loading dock area.

Page 1 of 2 ends

-1-

Staff Report — Installation of Time -Based Parking Restrictions in the 8800 block of Palm Street
May 13, 2024

Page 2 of 2 ends

DISCUSSION — Continued
On March 5, 2024, Public Works staff provided notice to area residents of the request to extend the existing red curb parking restrictions. During the preparation of the staff report for the March 19 Public Safety Commission meeting, staff determined that the item should be tabled to allow for additional review as the original request for 40 feet would not be sufficient to clear ingress and egress for their loading dock.

On March 28, the City Engineer and Director of Public Works conducted a site visit to better assess the need for restricted parking. Rather than extending the existing red curb that restricts parking all the time, the City is proposing to install 112 feet of time -based parking restrictions. Parking would be restricted Monday — Friday from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. These were the operating hours provided by Habitat for Humanity. Outside of these hours, parking would not be restricted. The location of the proposed change is illustrated in the attached aerial photograph.

On April 2, 2024, Public Works staff re -noticed area residents that a request to install time -based parking restrictions would be brought before the Public Safety Commission at its April 16, 2024, meeting. The City Engineer presented the request at this meeting and the Public Safety Commission recommended that the request to install the proposed time -based parking restrictions be forwarded to City Council for approval.

ATTACHMENTS
Aerial Photo 3
Street View Photo 4
Letter from Habitat for Humanity of Greater Los Angeles 5 Notification Letter to Residents 8
-2-

City of Bellflower
Installation of Time -Based Parking Restrictions
8800 Block of Palm Street
ttIVii 1...t tttbR
No Parking:

Monday - Friday
9:00 AM - 5:00 PM
E
s
Scale: 1 in = 40 ft
Printed 4/2/2024
-3-

8800 block of Palm Street
\\\\\F,,...

Proposed Time -Based Parking Restrictions
Monday - Friday
9:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m.
-4-

Dear City Engineering Department,
I hope this letter finds you well. I am writing on behalf of Habitat for Humanity of Greater Los Angeles located at 8739 Artesia Blvd. Bellflower, CA 90706.We are reaching out to request your assistance in improving access to our loading entrance area on Palm Ave, on the rear side of Habitat for Humanity building.

Our organization relies heavily on the efficient loading and unloading of goods and supplies for our operations. However, we have been experiencing significant difficulty due to the presence of parked vehicles in close proximity to our loading entrance area. Specifically, trucks attempting to back into the loading dock encounter challenges maneuvering safely and effectively when vehicles are parked too close.

To address this issue and ensure the smooth flow of operations, we kindly request the installation of a 40 foot red curb extension along Palm Ave, adjacent to our loading dock area or request a no parking zone. This would help to prevent vehicles from parking too close to the loading dock entrance area, allowing trucks the necessary space to maneuver safely and facilitating efficient loading and unloading procedures.

We understand the importance of parking availability in the area and are willing to be flexible regarding these restrictions. We propose limiting the red curb extension restrictions or no parking zone area to Monday through Saturday, from 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM, to accommodate the loading and unloading activities during regular business hours.

We believe that implementing a red curb extension or a no parking zone in this area would greatly alleviate the current challenges we face and contribute to the overall improvement of traffic flow and safety in the vicinity of our facility.

Thank you for considering our request. We are available to provide any additional information or assistance you may require. We look forward to a positive response and the opportunity to work together to enhance the accessibility and functionality of our loading dock entrance area.

Sincerely,
Michael Solorzano
Facilities and Safety Manager
(562) 483-9797
[email protected]
-5-

-6-

-7-

The City of Bellflower
gamniiies. J3usinesses. `.Ju/uses.
16600 Civic Center Drive, Bellflower, CA 90706
TeI 562.804.1424 Fax 562.925.8660 www.bellflower.org
April 2, 2024
G'1 4114
of BELLft0
°ROwnv° Tooe'l`'
SUBJECT: Notification of Pending Changes — Installation of Time -Based Parking Restrictions in the 8800 block of Palm Street
Dear Resident/Property Owner:

This letter is to inform you of the proposed change described below.

The City is proposing to install (112') of time -based parking restrictions in the 8800 block of Palm Street. Parking will be restricted on the north side of the street Monday — Friday from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Outside of these hours parking would not be restricted. The proposed change is illustrated on the attached aerial photograph.

This item will be discussed at the City of Bellflower's Public Safety Commission meeting on Tuesday, April 16, 2024. The meeting will be held at Bellflower City Hall in the City Council Chambers located at 16600 Civic Center Drive. The meeting will start at 7:00 p.m.

You are welcome to make your concerns known to the City by contacting Jerry Stock, City Engineer, at (562) 804-1424, ext. 2218 prior to April 16, 2024, or by presenting them at the April 16th Public Safety Commission meeting. Thank you in advance for your cooperation.

Sincerely,
Viiiivimifrr _IJorld443"
Kimberly Gonzalez
Public Works Coordinator
Enclosure: Aerial Photograph
>
-8-

pp BELLFLO
14 _ ( L staff
oRowtNGToovr-0 ¢ e p o r t 14-H
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
ATTENTION: Ryan Smoot, City Manager
FROM: Len Gorecki, Assistant City Manager/Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Consideration and possible action to authorize the City Manager to execute Agreement File No. 51.97, a funding agreement with the County of Los Angeles for the design and implementation of the Traffic Signal Synchronization Program (TSSP) for Woodruff Avenue from Foster Road to Rose Street.

DATE: May 13, 2024

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Agreement File No. 51.97 is a cooperative funding agreement between the City and the County of Los Angeles for the design and implementation of the Traffic Signal Synchronization Program (TSSP) for Woodruff Avenue from Foster Road to Rose Street in Bellflower.

RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL
1) Authorize the City Manager to execute Agreement File No. 51.97, in a form approved by the City Attorney; or
2) Alternatively, discuss and take other action related to this item.

FISCAL IMPACT
The City's proportional cost for the design and implementation of the Woodruff Avenue TSSP project is $424,100. Payment for the project is due after July 1, 2025.

Subsequently, as part of the next budget cycle, appropriate funding will be established for the project using Prop C funds as this project is Prop C eligible.

DISCUSSION
In June 2008, the City entered into a cooperative agreement with the County of Los Angeles which memorialized the relative rights, obligations and duties of each agency with respect to the Los Angeles County Traffic Signal Synchronization Program (TSSP).

The purpose of the TSSP is to maintain traffic signal coordination timing along arterial roadways in an effort to promote coordinated traffic operations, multi -jurisdictional cooperation and improve arterial traffic flow conditions. In March 2021, Amendment No. 1 was made to this agreement which added Woodruff Avenue and the relinquished portion of Lakewood Boulevard to the list of eligible arterial roadways in Bellflower.

Page 1 of 2 ends

-1-

Staff Report - Agreement File No. 51.97 County of Los Angeles Funding Agreement for Woodruff Avenue TSSP Project
May 13, 2024

Page 2 of 2 ends

DISCUSSION — Continued
The Woodruff Avenue TSSP project spans the entire length of Woodruff Avenue from Firestone Boulevard in Downey to Willow Street in Long Beach. The proposed improvements are jurisdictionally shared between the cities of Downey, Bellflower, Lakewood, Long Beach and Los Angeles County. The work associated with the TSSP project includes the preliminary engineering and design of the project, geotechnical investigation, surveying, utility coordination and relocation, traffic control, signal timing equipment and the construction management and inspection.

The total estimated cost of the Woodruff Avenue TSSP project is $5,176,000.

Bellflower's jurisdictional share of the estimated project is $1,294,100. In an effort to reduce the total project cost, the County has secured a regional grant for this project through Metro for an amount up to $1,992,000. By claiming our jurisdictional share of the Metro grant funds which are anticipated to be $484,500, and the County agreeing to contribute an additional $385,500 to Bellflower's total project cost, the City's net cost for the project is estimated to be $424,100 at this time. Traffic signal coordination projects are an eligible use of Prop C funds and the City will utilize this funding source to pay its jurisdictional share of the estimated project costs.

ATTACHMENT
Agreement File No. 51.97 3
-2-

AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into by and between the CITY OF BELLFLOWER, a municipal corporation in the County of Los Angeles, hereinafter referred to as CITY, and the COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, a political subdivision of the State of California (hereinafter referred to as COUNTY):

WITNESSETH
WHEREAS, to assist in the traffic flow, CITY, the City of Lakewood, the City of Long Beach, the City of Downey, and COUNTY desire to modify and synchronize the traffic signals along Woodruff Avenue from Firestone Boulevard to Willow Street, a portion of which is within CITY, and which work is hereinafter referred to as PROJECT; and
WHEREAS, the proposed improvements are jurisdictionally shared between CITY, the City of Lakewood, the City of Long Beach, the City of Downey, and COUNTY, and separate agreements between the City of Lakewood and COUNTY, the City of Long Beach and COUNTY are being executed covering the portions of PROJECT within the City of Lakewood's, and the City of Long Beach's, jurisdictions; and
WHEREAS, PROJECT is within the shared geographical boundaries of CITY, the City of Lakewood, the City of Long Beach, the City of Downey, and COUNTY; and
WHEREAS, PROJECT is of general interest to CITY, the City of Lakewood, the City of Long Beach, the City of Downey, and COUNTY; and WHEREAS, CITY and COUNTY, on March 22, 2021, entered into an amended Agreement to memorialize their understanding regarding their relative rights, obligations, and duties with respect to the County's Traffic Signal Synchronization Program (hereinafter referred to as TSSP Agreement); and WHEREAS, PROJECT is included in the TSSP Agreement; and WHEREAS, for the purpose of providing funding for PROJECT, COUNTY, as lead agency, on February 26, 2018, entered into an amended Memorandum of Understanding No. P00F3309 (MOU) with the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro); and
WHEREAS, COUNTY is willing to utilize and share with CITY the funding provided for in COUNTY/Metro MOU P00F3309 to finance a portion of COST OF PROJECT; and
WHEREAS, COST OF PROJECT includes the COST OF PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING, COST OF CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT, and COST OF CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION; and

Page 1 of 11 ends

-3-

WHEREAS, the total COST OF PROJECT is currently estimated to be Five Million One Hundred Seventy -Six Thousand and 00/100 Dollars ($5,176,000.00); and
WHEREAS, under the MOU, Metro will provide to COUNTY a grant (GRANT) of up to a maximum of One Million Nine Hundred Ninety -Two Thousand and 00/100 Dollars ($1,992,000.00) for PROJECT; and
WHEREAS, allocation of the Metro grant is currently estimated to be, Four Hundred Eighty -Four Thousand Five Hundred and Dollars and 00/100 ($484,500) towards CITY's jurisdictional share, Fifty -Three Thousand Nine Hundred and 00/100 Dollars ($53,900.00) towards COUNTY's jurisdictional share, Seven Hundred Eight Thousand Two Hundred and 00/100 Dollars ($708,200.00) towards the City of Lakewood's jurisdictional share, and Seven Hundred Forty -Five Thousand Four Hundred and 00/100 Dollars ($745,400.00) towards the City of Long Beach's jurisdictional share.

WHEREAS, CITY is willing to finance its jurisdictional share of COST OF PROJECT currently estimated to be One Million Two Hundred Ninety -Four Thousand One Hundred and 00/100 Dollars ($1,294,100.00) by claiming its share of COUNTY/Metro grant funds, currently estimated to be Four Hundred Eighty - Four Thousand Five Hundred and 00/100 Dollars ($484,500.00) and contributing other CITY funds in the amount of Four Hundred Twenty -Four Thousand One Hundred and 00/100 Dollars ($424,100.00) to finance a portion of the COST OF PROJECT; and
WHEREAS, COUNTY agrees to contribute Three Hundred Eighty -Five Thousand Five Hundred and 00/100 Dollars ($385,500.00) to finance a portion of CITY's COST OF PROJECT; and
WHEREAS, CITY agrees to contribute funds in the amount of Four Hundred Twenty -Four Thousand One Hundred and 00/100 Dollars ($424,100.00) to finance a portion of the COST OF PROJECT; and
WHEREAS, CITY'S estimated share is the sum of the costs of actual quantities of construction contract items utilized within CITY jurisdiction plus thirty (30) percent of that for PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING cost, twenty (20) percent of that for CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION cost, twenty (20) percent of that for contingencies, and three and a half (3.5) percent of combined costs of PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING and CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION towards contract city liability trust fund altogether estimated to be One Million Two Hundred Ninety -Four Thousand One Hundred and 00/100 Dollars ($1,294,100.00); and
WHEREAS, BASIC TRAFFIC SIGNAL TIMING involves the timing parameters for the general operation of a traffic signal, which typically include, but is not limited to, defining the phases, attributes and timing values for each permitted phase, pedestrian movement, and assigning detection; and

Page 2 of 11 ends

-4-

WHEREAS, COORDINATION TRAFFIC SIGNAL TIMING involves the timing parameters that allow multiple traffic signals to be synchronized with each other, which typically include defining coordination cycle lengths, offsets and time of day operations for each traffic signal coordination plan; and WHEREAS, COUNTY agrees to be responsible to perform or cause to be performed the PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING, solicitation of construction bids and award of CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT, and CONSTRUCTION
ADMINISTRATION for PROJECT; and
WHEREAS, COUNTY agrees to be responsible to perform or cause to be performed the equipment and system testing and develop and implement the BASIC TRAFFIC SIGNAL TIMING and COORDINATION TRAFFIC SIGNAL TIMING for PROJECT; and
WHEREAS, such a proposal is authorized and provided for by the provisions of Sections 6500 and 23004, et seq., of the Government Code and Sections 1685 and 1803 of the California Streets and Highways Code.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual benefits to be derived by CITY and COUNTY and of the promises herein contained, it is hereby agreed as follows:
(1) DEFINITIONS:
a. The term JURISDICTION, as referred to in this AGREEMENT, shall be defined as the area within the jurisdictional boundary of each governmental entity party to this AGREEMENT.
b. PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING, as referred to in this AGREEMENT, shall consist of environmental findings and approvals/permits; design survey; soils report; traffic index and geotechnical investigation; preparation of plans, specifications, and cost estimates; right-of-way engineering; utility engineering; and all other necessary work prior to advertising of PROJECT for construction bids.
c. COST OF CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT, as referred to in this AGREEMENT, shall consist of the actual payments to the construction contractor(s) for PROJECT and the total of all payments to utility companies or contractor(s) for the relocation of facilities necessary for the construction of PROJECT, and the cost of any additional unforeseen work that is necessary for the construction of PROJECT. d. CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION as referred to in this
AGREEMENT shall consist of construction contract administration, construction inspection, materials testing, construction survey, traffic detour, signing and striping, construction engineering, utility relocation

Page 3 of 11 ends

-5-

and coordination matters, changes and modifications of plans and specifications for PROJECT necessitated by unforeseen or unforeseeable field conditions encountered during construction of PROJECT, construction contingencies, and all other necessary work after advertising of PROJECT for construction bids to cause PROJECT to be constructed in accordance with said plans and specifications approved by CITY and COUNTY.
e. COST OF PROJECT, as referred to in this AGREEMENT, shall consist of the COST OF CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT and costs of

PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING, CONSTRUCTION
ADMINISTRATION, BASIC TRAFFIC SIGNAL TIMING, and
COORDINATION TRAFFIC SIGNAL TIMING for traffic signals within PROJECT limits, right-of-way acquisition and clearance matters, and all other work and materials necessary to construct PROJECT in accordance with the approved plans and shall include currently effective percentages added to total salaries, wages, and equipment costs to cover overhead, administration, and depreciation in connection with any or all of the aforementioned items.
f. Completion of PROJECT as referred to in this AGREEMENT shall be defined as the date of field acceptance of construction of PROJECT by COUNTY and an electronic notification to CITY'S City Manager that the improvements within CITY'S JURISDICTION are completed and transferred to CITY for purpose of operation and maintenance. (2) CITY AGREES:
a. To finance CITY'S share of COST OF PROJECT, the actual amount of which is to be determined by a final accounting, pursuant to paragraph (4) d., below.
b. To deposit with COUNTY, following execution of this AGREEMENT and upon demand by COUNTY on or after July 1, 2025, CITY funds in the amount of Four Hundred Twenty Four Thousand One Hundred and 00/100 Dollars ($424,100.00) hereinafter referred as CITY'S PAYMENT.

Said demand will consist of a billing invoice prepared by COUNTY and delivered to CITY.
c. To obtain and grant to COUNTY any necessary temporary right of way within CITY for the construction of PROJECT at no cost to COUNTY. d. To issue to COUNTY a no -fee permit(s) authorizing COUNTY to construct those portions of PROJECT with CITY highway right of way on condition that the COUNTY'S contractor meets the insurance requirements as required and approved by the CITY's Risk Manager.

Page 4 of 11 ends

-6-

e. To cooperate with COUNTY in conducting negotiations with and, where appropriate, issue notices to public utilities and owners of substructure and overhead facilities regarding the relocation, removal, operation, and maintenance of all surface and underground utilities and facilities, structures, and transportation services, which interfere with the proposed construction. Where utilities have been installed in CITY streets or on CITY property, CITY will provide the necessary right of way for the relocation of those utilities and facilities that interfere with the construction of PROJECT. CITY will take all necessary steps to grant, transfer, or assign all prior rights over utility companies and owners of substructure and overhead facilities when necessary to construct, complete, and maintain PROJECT.
f. To authorize COUNTY to represent CITY pursuant to this AGREEMENT, in negotiations pertaining to the advertisement of PROJECT for construction bids, award, and administration of the construction contract and in all things necessary and proper to complete PROJECT.
g. Upon completion of PROJECT: (1) to accept full and complete ownership of, and responsibility for, the PROJECT; and (2) to maintain in good condition and at CITY expense all improvements constructed as part of PROJECT within CITY'S JURISDICTION, including the BASIC TRAFFIC SIGNAL TIMING and the COORDINATION TRAFFIC
SIGNAL TIMING to support synchronization of traffic signals on Woodruff Avenue.
(3) COUNTY AGREES:
a. To perform or cause to be performed the preliminary engineering, contract administration, construction inspection and engineering, utility engineering and relocation, traffic detour, BASIC TRAFFIC SIGNAL TIMING, TRAFFIC SIGNAL COORDINATION TIMING, and final signing and striping for PROJECT.
b. To act as lead agency, prepare the necessary environmental documents, and make the required environmental findings for PROJECT pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. c. To contribute toward CITY'S share of COST OF PROJECT, currently estimated to be Three Hundred Eighty -Five Thousand Five Hundred and 00/100 Dollars ($385,500.00).
d. To submit an invoice to CITY in the amount of Four Hundred Twenty - Four Thousand One Hundred and 00/100 Dollars ($424,100.00) upon adoption of this AGREEMENT by COUNTY.

Page 5 of 11 ends

-7-

e. To obtain CITY'S approval of plans for PROJECT prior to advertising for construction bids.
f. To advertise PROJECT for construction bids, to award and to administer the construction contract, and to act on behalf of CITY in all negotiations pertaining thereto.
g.

To administer the design and construction of PROJECT in accordance with all regulations and requirements of Metro relating to the expenditure of Proposition C Local Return funds and Proposition C Twenty-five Percent (25%) Discretionary funds and Memorandum of Understanding No. P000F3309 between COUNTY and Metro. COUNTY'S records for PROJECT shall be open to inspection and subject to audit and reproduction by COUNTY and Metro, or any of their duly authorized representatives, and shall be retained by COUNTY for a period of not less than seven (7) years after final payment to contractor(s) for PROJECT.
h. To ensure that CITY and all officers and employees of CITY are named as additional insured parties under the construction contractor's(s') Contractor's General Liability and automobile insurance policies. i. To furnish to CITY, within one hundred eighty (180) calendar days after final Board acceptance of PROJECT, a final accounting of the actual CITY'S share of COST OF PROJECT including an itemization of actual unit costs and actual contract quantities for PROJECT.

To perform or cause to be performed the equipment and system testing and to develop and implement the BASIC TRAFFIC SIGNAL TIMING and COORDINATION TRAFFIC SIGNAL TIMING for the PROJECT. k. To return any unexpended CITY funds if COUNTY fails to complete all or a portion of PROJECT within CITY'S JURISDICTION.
(4) IT IS MUTUALLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED AS FOLLOWS:
a. Nothing in this AGREEMENT is intended to alter TSSP Agreement. b. The financial obligations of COUNTY pursuant to this AGREEMENT are conditional upon COUNTY obtaining reimbursement from Metro pursuant to Memorandum of Understanding No. P00F3309 between COUNTY and Metro. If COUNTY and/or Metro fails to provide its financial contribution, then COUNTY shall refund CITY'S payment within ninety (90) calendar days after notice from Metro to COUNTY that Metro funds are not available.
c. The final accounting of the actual total COST OF PROJECT shall allocate said total cost between CITY and COUNTY based on the

Page 6 of 11 ends

-8-

previously agreed upon improvements and/or work completed. Thus, the cost of all work or improvements (including all engineering, administration, and all other costs incidental to PROJECT work), previously agreed upon as CITY'S share of the COST OF PROJECT, shall be borne by CITY. The cost of all work or improvements (including all engineering, administration, and all other costs incidental to PROJECT work), previously agreed upon as COUNTY'S share of the COST OF PROJECT, shall be borne by COUNTY.
d. That if at final accounting CITY'S share of COST OF PROJECT exceeds CITY'S PAYMENT, as set forth in paragraph (2) b., above, CITY shall pay to COUNTY the additional amount upon demand. Said demand shall consist of a billing invoice prepared by COUNTY. Conversely, if CITY'S share is less than CITY'S PAYMENT, COUNTY shall refund the difference to CITY without further action by CITY.
e. That if CITY'S PAYMENT, as set forth in paragraph (2) b., above is not delivered to COUNTY office, which is described on the billing invoice prepared by COUNTY within sixty (60) calendar days after the date of said invoice, notwithstanding the provisions of Government Code Section 907, COUNTY may satisfy such indebtedness, including interest thereon, from any funds of CITY on deposit with COUNTY after giving notice to CITY of COUNTY'S intention to do so.
f. CITY shall review the final accounting invoice prepared by COUNTY and report in writing any discrepancies to COUNTY within sixty (60) calendar days after the date of said invoice. Undisputed charges shall be paid by CITY to COUNTY within sixty (60) calendar days after the date of said invoice. COUNTY shall review all disputed charges and submit a written justification detailing the basis for those charges within sixty (60) calendar days of receipt of CITY'S written report. CITY shall then make payment of the previously disputed charges or submit justification for nonpayment within sixty (60) calendar days after the date of COUNTY'S written justification.
g.

COUNTY at any time may, at its sole discretion, designate an alternative payment mailing address and an alternative schedule for payment of CITY funds if applicable. CITY shall be notified of such changes by invoice prepared by COUNTY and delivered to CITY.
h. During construction of PROJECT, COUNTY shall furnish an inspector or other representative to perform the functions of an inspector. CITY may also furnish, at no cost to COUNTY, an inspector or other representative to inspect construction of the PROJECT. CITY shall have no obligation to inspect the PROJECT and no liability shall be attributable as a result of CITY'S inspection or failure to inspect. Said inspectors shall cooperate and consult with each other, but the orders of COUNTY inspector to the contractor or any other person in charge of

Page 7 of 11 ends

-9-

construction shall prevail and be final, and COUNTY inspector shall be responsible for the proper inspection of PROJECT as needed. i. This AGREEMENT may be amended or modified only by mutual written consent of COUNTY and CITY. Amendments and modifications of a nonmaterial nature may be made by the mutual written consent of the parties.
j.

Any correspondence, communication, or contact concerning this AGREEMENT shall be directed to the following:

CITY:

Mr. Len Gorecki
Director of Public Works
City of Bellflower
16600 Civic Center Drive
Bellflower, CA 90706
COUNTY: Mr. Mark Pestrella
Director of Public Works
Los Angeles County Public Works
P.O. Box 1460
Alhambra, CA 91802-1460
k. COUNTY and CITY acknowledge and recognize that the improvements contemplated by this AGREEMENT provide significant regional and local benefits with respect to reducing traffic congestion. COUNTY and CITY further acknowledge and recognize that the cost of defending claims and lawsuit arising from the improvements contemplated by this AGREEMENT is paid for by public monies and both parties share an interest in reducing the amount of public monies spent on defending claims and lawsuits where possible without prejudicing their respective defenses.

I. In the event that a claim lawsuit is brought against COUNTY and CITY based on the allegation that the design, construction, maintenance, or operation of the improvements constructed under this AGREEMENT proximately caused injuries or damage, COUNTY and CITY agree to cooperate as much as possible with respect to defending the claim or lawsuit without causing prejudice to their respective defenses to the claim or lawsuit. Upon receipt of the claim or lawsuit, the COUNTY and CITY, through their respective agents if appropriate, shall promptly investigate the matter. COUNTY and CITY shall then meet and confer promptly regarding whether a joint defense is appropriate or if one party should tender its defense and indemnification to the other party.

Page 8 of 11 ends

-10-

m. Neither COUNTY nor any officer or employee of COUNTY shall be responsible for any damage or liability occurring by reason of any act or omission on the part of CITY under or in connection with any work, authority, or jurisdiction delegated to, assumed by, or determined to be the responsibility of CITY under this AGREEMENT. It is also understood and agreed that, pursuant to Government Code, Section 895.4, CITY shall fully indemnify, defend, and hold COUNTY harmless from any liability imposed for injury (as defined by Government Code, Section 810.8) occurring by reason of any act or omission on the part of CITY under or in connection with any work, authority, or jurisdiction delegated to or determined to be the responsibility of CITY under this AGREEMENT. Where liability for injury (as defined by Government Code, Section 810.8) is sought to be imposed under Section 830, et seq., of the Government Code for a dangerous condition of property owned by or under the control of CITY, CITY shall fully defend, indemnify, and hold COUNTY harmless from any and all liability arising from such dangerous condition.
n. Neither CITY nor any officer or employee of CITY shall be responsible for any damage or liability occurring by reason of any act or omission on the part of COUNTY under or in connection with any work, authority, or jurisdiction delegated to or determined to be the responsibility of COUNTY under this AGREEMENT. It is also understood and agreed that, pursuant to Government Code, Section 895.4, COUNTY shall fully indemnify, defend, and hold CITY harmless from any liability imposed for injury (as defined by Government Code, Section 810.8) occurring by reason of any act or omission on the part of COUNTY under or in connection with any work, authority, or jurisdiction delegated to or determined to be the responsibility of COUNTY under this AGREEMENT.
o. It is understood and agreed that the provisions of Assumption of Liability Agreement No. 32050 between CITY and COUNTY, adopted by the Board of Supervisors on December 27, 1977, and currently in effect, are inapplicable to this AGREEMENT.
11 11
11 11
11 11
11 11
11 11
11 11
11

Page 9 of 11 ends

-11-

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this AGREEMENT to be executed by their respective officers, duly authorized, by the CITY OF BELLFLOWER on , 2024, and by the
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES on , 2024.

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
By
Director of Public Works
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

DAWYN R. HARRISON
County Counsel
By
Deputy

CITY OF BELLFLOWER
By
City Manager
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

By By
City Clerk City Attorney

Page 10 of 11 ends

-12-

SP:\TSM\TRA\TSSP/2009 Call/GW/Woodruff TSSP/8 Cost Estimate/Funding Agreements

Page 11 of 11 ends

-13-

CRO'WING TOcir,.•
GSA � � LLFj owk'k
stafteport
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Ryan Smoot, City Manager
SUBJECT: Consideration and possible action to authorize the City Manager to issue a letter to Hollywood Sports Park, LLC (HSP) regarding the City's intent to approve, upon HSP's request, the first lease extension option under the Agency Sublease with HSP for use of real property at 9030 Somerset Boulevard and 9108 Somerset Boulevard.

Date: May 13, 2024

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The proposed action seeks authorization for the City Manager to issue a notice of intent letter to Hollywood Sports Park, LLC (HSP) regarding the potential extension of its lease agreement for use of real property located at 9030 Somerset Boulevard and 9108 Somerset Boulevard. The proposed letter expresses the City's intent to approve the next option on the lease when and if requested by HSP as stipulated in the lease.

While the formal request from HSP to exercise its option under the lease may not be made until October 2024, this letter signifies the City's commitment to retaining HSP as a valued tenant and community partner and expresses the City's intent to approve that request when it is made. This proactive approach emphasizes the City's interest in supporting its long-standing partnership with HSP and assuring HSP and its operators that the City is committed to working together to support our community for many years to come.

RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL
1) Authorize the City Manager to issue a letter to Hollywood Sports Park, LLC (HSP) regarding the City's intent to approve, upon HSP's request, the first lease extension option under the Agency Sublease with HSP for use of real property at 9030 Somerset Boulevard and 9108 Somerset Boulevard; or
2) Alternatively, discuss and take other action related to this item.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with this action.

Page 1 of 2 ends

-1-

Staff Report — Lease Extension Letter to Hollywood Sports Park, LLC May 13, 2024

Page 2 of 2 ends

BACKGROUND
Hollywood Sports Park, LLC has been the tenant of City -owned property at 9030 Somerset Boulevard and 9108 Somerset Boulevard since October 23, 2000. On March 21, 2000, the City and former Bellflower Redevelopment Agency entered into a Disposition and Development Agreement with Hollywood Sports Park, LLC to develop and operate approximately 22 acres into, among other things, an outdoor recreational paintball park and BMX Bike Track. Subsequently, an Agency Sublease ("Sublease") between the former Bellflower Redevelopment Agency and Hollywood Sports Park, LLC was executed on October 23, 2000. The Sublease (which was assigned to the City on February 25, 2013) established a 25 -year lease term through October 23, 2025, with three (3) consecutive additional periods of ten (10) years each on the same terms and conditions contained in the Sublease. Written notice of HSP's exercise of its option to extend the Term of the Sublease must be given to the City no more than twelve (12) months prior, but no less than three (3) months before October 23, 2025.

Accordingly, the earliest HSP can request to exercise its first 10 -year option to extend the lease is October 24, 2024. However, issuing this letter signifies the City's commitment to retaining HSP as a valued tenant and community partner.

HSP holds a significant presence as a well-known business within the community, consistently drawing enthusiasts of paintball and BMX from diverse geographic areas throughout the greater L.A. region and contributes positively to the Bellflower community.

HSP continues to make timely lease payments and maintains a collaborative working relationship with City staff.

ATTACHMENT
Letter to Hollywood Sports Park, LLC 3
-2-

The City of Bellflower
`,7amifxes. Businesses. 7ulures.
16600 Civic Center Drive, Bellflower, CA 90706
Tel 562.804.1424 Fax 562.925.8660 www.bellflower.org
May 13, 2024
Dennis Bukowski
Hollywood Sports Park, LLC
90 Marbella
San Clemente, CA 92673
G�C`1 of BELLFLoi..
°'O G T00.'-
SUBJECT: Option to Extend — Agency Sublease between the City of Bellflower and Hollywood Sports Park, LLC
Dear Mr. Bukowski:

Thank you for your company's ongoing partnership with the City of Bellflower ("City"). The City Council values the many years your company has demonstrated good corporate citizenship and looks forward to many more. Toward that end, this letter expresses the City's intent to approve, upon your company's request as outlined in your lease agreement, the next option on the lease with Hollywood Sports Park, LLC for use of real property at 9030 Somerset Boulevard and 9108 Somerset Boulevard. As you know, formal acceptance of HSP's request for an extension may not happen until October of this year, but should you desire to make that request, it is the City's intent to continue our partnership for many more years.

The City is committed to facilitating a smooth and seamless renewal process and, as always, I am available to address any questions or concerns you may have. Please do not hesitate to contact me at (562) 804-1424 ext. 2207 or via email at rsmoot(c�bel lflower.org.

Sincerely,
Ryan Smoot
City Manager
-3-

- i. o LLFL0 W
c\ -"'c -?i,
OR "'WING TOGfrt--
staf�eport 14J
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
ATTENTION: Ryan Smoot, City Manager
FROM: Len Gorecki, Assistant City Manager/Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Consideration and possible action to adopt Resolution No. 24-23 — A Resolution approving the Plans and Specifications for the Bellflower Youth and Senior Center (Specifications No. 23/24-07) pursuant to Government Code § 830.6, establishing a project payment account; and authorizing solicitation of bids.

DATE: May 13, 2024

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This action would approve the Plans and Specifications and authorize the Public Works Department to advertise for bids for the Bellflower Youth and Senior Center (Specifications No. 23/24-07). The award of the contract will be brought before the City Council at a later date for formal award of the project.

RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL
1) Adopt Resolution No. 24-23; or
2) Alternatively, discuss and take other action related to this item.

FISCAL IMPACT
The Engineer's estimate of cost plus contingency to perform the work under Specifications No. 23/24-07 is $10,755,000. Funds are budgeted in Account Nos. 011-47604-9000 (General Fund Capital Projects — Youth/Senior Center), 030-47604-9000 (Grant Funds — Youth/Senior Center), and 070-47604-9000 (Measure A Fund — Youth/Senior Center).

DISCUSSION
The Parks and Recreation Department received Measure A grant funds from the Los Angeles County Regional Park and Open Space District (RPOSD) for the planning and design of the Bellflower Youth and Senior Center. On June 27, 2022, the City entered into agreements with Pretty Smart and NCA Studio Inc. for design architectural services. The plans, specifications, and a preliminary engineer's estimate have been completed. Upon City Council approval of the Plans and Specifications, staff will solicit bids for the construction of the new facility.

Page 1 of 2 ends

Staff Report — Approval of Plans and Specifications for the Bellflower Youth and Senior Center, Spec. No. 23/24-07
May 13, 2024

Page 2 of 2 ends

CEQA
Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Public Resources Code §§ 21000, et seq.) and CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations, Title 14, §§ 15000, et seq.), the City conducted an environmental assessment for the project consisting of an Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration. The Initial Study determined that the project would not result in any significant effect on the environment with incorporation of mitigation measures contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration.

ATTACHMENTS
Resolution No. 24-23 3
Plans and Specifications No. 23/24-07 5
-2-

CITY OF BELLFLOWER
RESOLUTION NO. 24-23

A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLANS AND

SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE BELLFLOWER YOUTH AND
SENIOR CENTER (SPECIFICATIONS NO. 23/24-07)
PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE § 830.6,
ESTABLISHING A PROJECT PAYMENT ACCOUNT; AND

AUTHORIZING SOLICITATION OF BIDS
THE CITY COUNCIL RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. The City Council finds and declares as follows:

A. Public Works Department prepared the plans and specifications for the Bellflower Youth and Senior Center ("Project");
B. The Director of Public Works reviewed the completed Plans and Specifications for the Project and agrees that the plans and specifications are complete and the Project may be completed;
C. The City Council wishes to obtain the immunities set forth in Government Code §830.6 with regard to the Plans and Specifications and completion of the Project; and
D. The City reviewed the project's environmental impacts under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Public Resources Code §§ 21000, et seq.) and CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations, Title 14 §§ 15000, et seq.), conducted an Initial Study, and prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration. The Initial Study determined that the project would not result in any significant effect on the environment with incorporation of mitigation measures contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration.

SECTION 2. Design Immunity; Authorization.

A. The Plans and Specifications for the Project are determined to be consistent with the City's standards and are approved.

B. The Plans and Specifications approval set forth in this Resolution occurred before actual work on the Project construction commenced.

C. The approval granted by this Resolution conforms to the City's General Plan.

D. The Director of Public Works, or designee, is authorized to act on the City's behalf in approving any alterations or modifications of the Plans and Specifications approved by this Resolution.

Page 1 of 2 ends

-3-

City of Bellflower
Resolution No. 24-23

Page 2 of 2 ends

E. The approval and authorization granted by this Resolution is intended to avail the City of the immunities set forth in Government Code §830.6.

F. The City Manager, or designee, may solicit bids for the Project in accordance with applicable law.

SECTION 3. Project Payment Account. For purposes of the Contract Documents administering the Project, the City Council directs the City Manager, or designee, to establish a fund containing sufficient monies from the current fiscal year budget to pay for the Project ("Project Payment Account"). The Project Payment Account is the sole source of funds available for the Contract Sum, as defined in the Contract Documents administering the Project.

SECTION 4. If any part of this Resolution or its application is deemed invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, the City Council intends that such invalidity will not affect the effectiveness of the remaining provisions or applications and, to this end, the provisions of this Resolution are severable.

SECTION 5. Electronic Signatures. This Resolution may be executed with electronic signatures in accordance with Government Code 16.5 Such electronic signatures will be treated in all respects as having the same effect as an original signature.

SECTION 6. The Mayor, or presiding officer, is hereby authorized to affix his signature to this Resolution signifying its adoption by the City Council of the City of Bellflower and the City Clerk, or her duly appointed deputy, shall attest thereto.

SECTION 7. This Resolution will become effective immediately upon adoption.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BELLFLOWER ON THIS 13TH DAY OF MAY 2024.

Dan Koops, Mayor
ATTEST:

Mayra Ochiqui, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Karl H. Berger, City Attorney
-4-

BUILDING GRID LINES

REVISI ON CLOUD
OCC
WATER

CL OSETS

U RIN ALS

LA VAT ORIES

D RINKIN G

F OUNT AINS

SER VICE
SINK

FIRE SPRINKLER

FIRE ALARM

HEALTH DEPA RTMENT
• EV PARKING MOT IN SC OPE , PART OF PARKING L OT AND ST OR MWAT§R

RECAPTURE PROJE CT)
• ILLUMINATED SIGNS
• SOLAR
• SITE CMU WALL
• S

SIDEWALK
)
)
)
PROJECT ADDRESS_ issrocuRx AVE
BELLFL OWE R, CA 90706
COUNT Y: LOS ANGELES

ASSESS OR'S PA RCEL
NUMBER_ ],0 6003902,],0600 3903,],06003909
ZONE: 0.S (OPEN SPACE)
LOT SIZE_

BUILDING C ONSTRUCTION
T YPE: TYPE V -B
O CCUPANCY_ B( OFFICE), A3(ASSE MBLY) , S-1(STORAGE) Q
OCCUPANT LO ADS_ B ( OFFICE) 8, A3 ( ASSEMBLY):569 , S-1 (ST ORA GE)6 , TST _ :2
• •I D. E
BLDG HEIGHT (IN FEET) 26'b "
BUILDIN G AREA 10,560 SF (INTE RI OR)'10903F (PATIO)=11650 SF PR OJE CT AREA: 33,359 SF
SC OPE OF W ORK: NEW CONSTRUCTION OF A CO MMUNITY BUILDING WITH

ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES FOR THE CITY OF

BELLFL OWE R
A
��LL;;JJ EC30S0N0POUNnENVI RONMENTAL
L
MALE
127
3 2
1 R EVISI ON N O.

T OT AL

FIXTU RES

FE MALE
,2]
6 2
-

REQUIRED
TOTAL
253
9 2
3 2
1 WIN DOW SYMBOL

MATCH LINE
MALE
12]
1 2
1 ETNO.

TOTAL

FIXTURES

FE MALE
12]
4 -
2 REFE REN CE LETTER

T HE SHA DED

PORTON IS E

PROVIDED
UNISEX
4 1
4 CONSI DER ED
TOTAL
253
9 3
7 3
1 DO OR SY MB OL

FIXTURE AND

EQUIPMENT SYMB OL P ATI O
PLUMBING FI XTU RE CALCULATIO NS PER CPC TABLE 422.1
SEP ARATE PER MITS SCALE 4A

PM XI JAE
AREA

FACTO R
OCC

PM NAME
AREA

F ACT OR
044
NIA
nal R EO RErvcE NO.

DM
1105 SF
30 FEM ALE RES TRGO M 112
APPROVED C80 WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN WILL BE PROVIDED BY GENERAL

CONTR ACT OR BEFORE THE BUILDIN G PE RMIT IS ISSUED
PATIO STO RAGE 002
161 SF
4000
0 MALE RESTROOM 113
ENTRY FOYER 100
279 SF
30 FAMILY RESI RO OM 114
NA
DETAIL

R OOM LABELRECEPTION
101
80 SF
30 IT ROOM 115
COMMON ARE A 102 A
2075 SF
30 COMMUNI TY RO OM 1160
471 SF
30 <WI
'MN E
R OOM
COMMON ARE A 102B
607 SF
30 zo
B
482 SF
30 AR EA REFER ENC E
LIMN
RE51RO OM 103
NA
COMM UNITY STORAGE rM
000
0 DETA IL NO .

R OO M
R ESIROOM 1.

NA
BR EA K AREA118
173 SF
3B

SH EET NO .

JANI TOR 105
NA
HALL 11 9
NA
No.
12 o 00Mo SENI OR
STO RAGE 106
309 SF
4000
0 RESIR OOM 120

FLOOR LE VEL

SENIO R RM 107B
478 SF
30 OPEN OFFICE 122
293 SF
2 KITCH EN 108
300 SF
50 6
PRI VA TE OFFICE 123
99 SF

EX TERIOR ELEVA TION

SECTI ON
DR Y GO ODS STO RAG E 109
87 SF
4000
PRI VA TE OFFICE 124
104 SF
YOUTH ROOM 110A
476 SF
30 PRIVATE OFFICE 125
134 SF
50 ELEV ATION NO.

YOUTH ROOM r10B
485 SF
30 PRIVATE ODE'
134 SF
SH EET

YOUTH STORAGE,'
425 SF
4000
0 TOTAL26
a SE
253
SC ALE

PLUMBING FIXTURE CALLS
7 NOTE
SCALE
4B

PROJECT INF ORMATI ON
SC ALE
N/ A
N/A

INTERIOR ELEVA TIO N

INTERI OR FINISH
AlN rrvo.IrvPICALI

L ESS T HAN
10%

OWNER CIVIL/ STRUCTUR AL

ENGINEER

CITY OF BELLFLOWER LABIB FUNK B ASSOCIATES
16600 CI VIC CENTER DRIVE 319 M AIN ST REET

BELLFLOWER, CA EL SE GUNDO , CA
90]06 90245
56 2804_,424 2,32399]00

—

AC CESS OR Y

RUSE, NO

SEPA RATOR

EQ UIRED

PARTIO N SYM BO L

MATERIAL TAG
_
r
10 7
4 1
NCA STUDIO, IN C. ARC ENGINEERIN G
923E 3RD STREET #108 3045 N. HOLLYWO OD

L OS AN GELES, CA BURBANK, CA
90013 91505
3236382344 8,850 86300

DESIGN ARCHITE CT LANDSCAPE ARCHITE CT
WAY
�/Bo

MATER IAL CO DE
�PnaTlTlary TYPE
!

MA TERIA L NUMB ER
11 8
5 2

FINISH TRANSITIO N
sw DIMENSION STRING
II
I

PRE TTY SMART KORN RANDOLPH
411] E 4TH STREET 609 E AST GREEN

LONG BEACH, CA P ASADENA, CA
90814
56 9,10,
2 343 2491 626_564 .0259

FO OD SER VICE C ONSULT ANT AV/ TELECOM C ONSULTANTS
STREET
12 9
fi
3 , I' r
��llkkFFHH'{'{"
I

CEILING H EIG HT

Q NOR TH A RRO W
-

ALL DR AWINGS AN D DET AILS ARE IDENTIFIED ID NU MB ER IN THE ALL NUMB ER LOCATIONSc ox ORM TO THIS GRID 545069 .

ER
L OWRI GHT Ham
O

_(
P
DESIGN F OR RESTAUR ANT PLUS, INC . WAVE GUIDE
1195_ATLANTIC BLVD_ #228 6060 CENTER DRIVE
MONT EREY PA RK, CA 91]84 LOS AN GELES,
90045
6265789978 832 _372_5428

SI GN AGE C ONSULT ANT PV C ONSULT ANT
CA
C 8'-0" CEILING HEIGHT
—
L

WORK POINT OR

CO NTRO L POINT
GRA.

DW YONS
1133 B RO ADW AY

SAN D IEGO, AY

SAN DIEGO, CA
92123
61923 91336

GE OTFCHNICAI

TETR A TECH
2170 COPLEY DR, STE 200

DIA MOND BAR, CA
9,]65
sos_aso�n]
., ., ., ., ... _.., ., .,
QMECOEEEE.
1309 SHERIDFFEEN AVE,YE
82801 AN, WY
82801
Q 2, 3444.9100
LLC
STE 1200
J

ELEVATIO N TA G
BOOCCUPAN PAR T -110 N
® Sxa RA TED PARn r

SYMBOLS
SCALE

11 O CCUPANCY SEPA RATIO N SCALE
s

SHEET GRID SYSTEM
SCALE
5 NIA
N/A
NIA
B
.. Angle COL Co lumn F.D. Floor Dram INSU L Insu labon OF F AL Inte rio r CO RD Con dition or
me CONN Co nne ction F.E.C. Frre Extinguis her cab 446 tor Dom Con dense r Cabin et JS Jo in P
F. H.C. Fire Ho se
D ia me ter or
41 ormen dicu tar CO RER Con trac to r FIN Fin ish
a/ Number k IBM PL
OFR Cen te r FLUOR Fluore scen t LAM Lames

C. W. AO Arr Co nditio ning to A nc ho r Bo lt C TSK LA V PLMG AC T A coustical Tile D Deep, Depth F.0 S. Face of ammtiA.C. A sphaltic Concrete F 0 M. Face of M asonry Leff Hand PLA S LT Light PR
=:111e OBL Dou ble
PT
A.F F. A bove EM I. Fl oor OF. Danking Fountain FS Full Size LV R Louver P. T.D.

ALT A lte r or Ntemate D IA Diame ter FT Foot, Feet P TN ALUM Aluminum DIM Dimens ion FTG FootingANOD A no dize d a Q .T.O A.P. A ccegs Panel Er APPROX A pproxim ate 0 .0. �rOpeninti Architec tu ra l
DS Downs pou t GA Gauge
AS PH Aspha lt OR Door
R .D.

OS P. Dry Sta ndloge GB. Grab Bar u , REF
Dra wer
own DwGlazing MIN RE IN F
MOD Bulklin g GM G round M IR M irro r RE G BLlte Blocking EA Ea. Ge d YP G ypsum PoeBM Beam El Expansio n Joint M R. M ois ture m R EG BOT Bo tto m EL Ele vation H High
BR Bedro om ELEC Electrical H. Hose Bib MUL Mullio n RM R ootingRo ugh
aw0
CAB Cabinet EO.S. Edge Eqmm neSlab
C.D. C atch B asin E QUIP HORI2 H onz ontal No Scale No CEM Ce men t E. W. Eac h Wa y HR Ho ur .T 5 Not to FR He ight SECT rc mer H.W.Ho t wa le s im sae
Iron E xs Heating,Ventilatio n S EP
CLG C eiling EXP ma - -- Sx
CLO C lo set Ex posed Obsc ure SHR
CLR C lea r Eele ro r c omes sHT
Con crete Maso nry Una TD. Inside Demeter OB. Outside Demeter sM G.emow an _
Owrnana SP EC Squar ne
Op en mg a wT wegM
e Standard
STL S tee l
STO R Storage
!enterDrain
late
�mm �a
Laminate System
Wood T TreadOU S
ati
am t T.B
aper Towe l DueeTAG To welBa rAG
Dop rain
Top
amMtie Te mpe ra ture
asARCH
Roof Drain TOIL To OM,
Refe re nce T.O. P. Top of
...or T.O .S. Top of Slab
Rea moo R emo sense s
T.S. To p of Ste el
TV Te.m sion
Roofing TIP Typical °,
Rehr a. UN F Unfinishe d aerwse Note d,,
Openng
-
voL Vary -n Held
So ld Core Mme
Sec tio n
Separa tion, wnn
n Separate r
snow wmern eate
snorer W/O wnnout
Snem wC. wa erc lo se t
s mear wO wo oa
,... -, .. . .. .
{
ry .: f w : 9 8
fir_
VZ� w ��i.. at _,

4. I a at ' -Mt
a .. ..
t. .-_ ..
i - p
wal

PROJECT DIRECTORY
SC ALE
2 APPLICABLE CODES:
`
I
Op,ts fw f i
;9 ; ,
`+► ..
.! ( �,�Wed
7 t
4,4 ` r
@}�
s � .'
, ..
,
s HT 11 I ,
N '" '"
.MLINIKAN.��:

CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE
2022 CALIFO RNI A C ODE OF RE GUL ATIONS TITLE 24, P ART 2022 CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE
2022 CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE
2022 CALIFO RNI A PLU MBING CODE
2022 CALIFO RNI A ENER GY CODE
2022 C ALIF ORNIA GREEN ENER GY CODE
2020 CALIFORNIA HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE, PART ]_ CALIFORNIA RETAIL F OOD CODE 2022 CIT Y OF BELLFLOWER MUNI CIPAL CODE

ABBREVIATIO NS I
SCA LE
9 VICINITY MAP
SCALE
6 APPLICABLE CODES
SC ALE
s
N/A
N/A
N/A

TITLE SHEET
JOB 422-0718
A0.00

A COMPLETE SET OF PLANS AND

SPECIFICATIONS ARE AVAILABLE FOR

INSPECTION WITH THE PUBLIC WORKS
DEPARTMENT.

c,' ov BELLFLob,
-
'C k�jWING TOGIOlk-
staf 14-K
report
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
ATTENTION: Ryan Smoot, City Manager
FROM: Mayra Ochiqui, City Clerk
SUBJECT: Consideration and possible action to approve the reappointment of Chamber of Commerce's nominee Larry Wehage to the Southeast Los Angeles County Workforce Development Board
(SELACO WDB) for the term ending June 2026.

DATE: May 13, 2024

RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL
1) Approve the reappointment of Chamber of Commerce's nominee Larry Wehage to the SELACO WDB for the term ending June 2026; or
2) Alternatively, discuss and take other action related to this item.

FISCAL IMPACT
Private Sector Directors receive $75 for each meeting of the Policy Board attended, up to a maximum of $75 per month per Resolution No. 03-14 adopted April 14, 2013. Funds are budgeted in Account No. 010-41210-1000.

BACKGROUND
Each participating city has two Private Sector Director on the Southeast Los Angeles County Workforce Development Board (SELACO WDB), which serve staggered, two-year terms. WDB Private Sector Directors meet bi-monthly on the third Tuesday of the month at 12:00 noon, location varies, (SELACO WDB Offices are located at 10900 East 183rd Street, Suite 350, Cerritos). Private Sector Directors must be nominated by local business organizations and business trade associations (e.g., the Chamber of Commerce), and must be representatives of business in the local area who:
1) are owners of businesses, chief executives or operating officers of businesses, and other business executives or employers with optimum policy -making or hiring authority; and
2) represent businesses with employment opportunities that reflect the employment opportunities of the local area.

Bellflower's current representatives are Aaron Drake and Larry Wehage. The Directors of the Chamber of Commerce have requested that Larry Wehage be reappointed to serve as Bellflower's Private Sector Director on the SELACO WDB for the term ending June 2026 (correspondence attached).

ATTACHMENT
Correspondence from Chamber of Commerce 2

April 29th, 2024
Ms. Mayra Ochiqui
Bellflower City Clerk
16600 Civic Center Drive
Bellflower, CA 90706
Dear Ms. Ochiqui,
The Bellflower Chamber of Commerce Board of Directors nominates Vice President, Larry Wehage to remain and serve on the SELACO Workforce Investment Board representing the Bellflower Chamber of Commerce.

Sincerely,
/1(70 -
Michele Moore
Chamber Manager
Bellflower Chamber of Commerce [email protected]
16730 Bellflower Blvd, Suite A Bellflower, CA 90706 www.bellflowerchamber.org

Bellflower City CouncilMay 13, 2024

Bellflower City Council
May 13, 2024