Bellflower City Council
April 27, 2026

238

The plus sign (+) indicates the tree species is native to another continent other than the ones listed in the grouping.

Invasive plant species are often characterized by their vigor, ability to adapt, reproductive capacity, and general lack of natural enemies. These abilities enable them to displace native plants and make them a threat to natural areas.

Five of the 206 tree species in City of Bellflower are identified as invasive on the state invasive species list (California Invasive Species Advisory Committee 2010). These invasive species comprise 1.7 percent of the tree population though they may only cause a minimal level of impact. The three most common invasive species are Punk tree (1.1 percent of population), Chinese tallowtree (0.4 percent), and California peppertree (0.1 percent) (see Appendix V for a complete list of invasive species).

239

II. Urban Forest Cover and Leaf Area
Many tree benefits equate directly to the amount of healthy leaf surface area of the plant. Trees cover about 113.5 acres of City of Bellflower and provide 571.1 acres of leaf area. 600 -
500 -
;°400 -
Q1 300 -
200 -
J
100 -
n
Stratum
Figure 5. Leaf area by stratum, City of Bellflower
In City of Bellflower, the most dominant species in terms of leaf area are Australian willow, Sycamore spp, and Callery pear. The 10 species with the greatest importance values are listed in Table 1. Importance values (IV) are calculated as the sum of percent population and percent leaf area. High importance values do not mean that these trees should necessarily be encouraged in the future; rather these species currently dominate the urban forest structure.

Table 1. Most important species in City of Bellflower
Species Name
Percent Percent
Population Leaf Area
IV
Common crapemyrtle
Australian willow
Callery pear Sycamore
spp Outeniqua
yellowwood Glossy
privet Southern
magnolia Chinese elm
Queen palm
Holly oak

13.5 8.4

6.1 4.0

4.5 3.5

2.9 2.8

5.1 2.2

6.2 9.1

6.5 8.0

5.4 4.1

4.7 3.8

1.3 4.2

19.8 17.5

12.5 11.9

9.9 7.6

7.6 6.6

6.4 6.4

240

This page is left intentionally blank.

F'aee 8
241

III. Air Pollution Removal by Urban Trees
Poor air quality is a common problem in many urban areas. It can lead to decreased human health, damage to landscape materials and ecosystem processes, and reduced visibility. The urban forest can help improve air quality by reducing air temperature, directly removing pollutants from the air, and reducing energy consumption in buildings, which consequently reduces air pollutant emissions from the power sources. Trees also emit volatile organic compounds that can contribute to ozone formation. However, integrative studies have revealed that an increase in tree cover leads to reduced ozone formation (Nowak and Dwyer 2000).

Pollution removal' by trees in City of Bellflower was estimated using field data and recent available pollution and weather data available. Pollution removal was greatest for ozone (Figure 7). It is estimated that trees remove 3.107 tons of air pollution (ozone (03), carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), particulate matter less than 2.5 microns (PM2.5), particulate matter less than 10 microns and greater than 2.5 microns (PM10*)1, and sulfur dioxide (SO2)) per year with an associated value of $61.8 thousand (see Appendix I for more details). 3000 - - 35
A
2500 -
a 2000 -
cu1500
1000 -
m
a 500 -
0 5O2
O
1,1O2 O3 Ptv12, 5 FP:110*
Pollutants
Figure 7. Annual pollution removal (points) and value (bars) by urban trees, City of Bellflower Value (thousands $)
PM10' is particulate matter less than 10 microns and greater than 2.5 microns. PM2.5 is particulate matter less than 2.5 microns. If PM2.5 is not monitored, PM10' represents particulate matter less than 10 microns. PM2,5 is generally more relevant in discussions concerning air pollution effects on human health, Trees remove PM2.5 and PM10' when particulate matter is deposited on leaf surfaces. This deposited PM2.5 and PM10' can be resuspended to the atmosphere or removed during rain events and dissolved or transferred to the soil. This combination of events can lead to positive or negative pollution removal and value depending on various atmospheric factors (see Appendix I for more details).

242

In 2026, trees in City of Bellflower emitted an estimated 3.247 tons of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) (1.747 tons of isoprene and 1.5 tons of monoterpenes). Emissions vary among species based on species characteristics (e.g. some genera such as oaks are high isoprene emitters) and amount of leaf biomass. Thirty- two percent of the urban forest's VOC emissions were from Holly oak and Glossy privet. These VOCs are precursor chemicals to ozone formation.' General recommendations for improving air quality with trees are given in Appendix VIII. 3 Some economic studies have estimated VOC emission costs. These costs are not included here as there is a tendency to add positive dollar estimates of ozone removal effects with negative dollar values of VOC emission effects to determine whether tree effects are positive or negative in relation to ozone. This combining of dollar values to determine tree effects should not be done, rather estimates of VOC effects on ozone formation (e.g., via photochemical models) should be conducted and directly contrasted with ozone removal by trees (i.e., ozone effects should be directly compared, not dollar estimates). In addition, air temperature reductions by trees have been shown to significantly reduce ozone concentrations (Cardelino and Chameides 1990; Nowak et al 2000), but are not considered in this analysis. Photochemical modeling that integrates tree effects on air temperature, pollution removal, VOC emissions, and emissions from power plants can be used to determine the overall effect of trees on ozone concentrations.

243

IV. Carbon Storage and Sequestration
Climate change is an issue of global concern. Urban trees can help mitigate climate change by sequestering atmospheric carbon (from carbon dioxide) in tissue and by altering energy use in buildings, and consequently altering carbon dioxide emissions from fossil -fuel based power sources (Abdollahi et al 2000).

Trees reduce the amount of carbon in the atmosphere by sequestering carbon in new growth every year. The amount of carbon annually sequestered is increased with the size and health of the trees. The gross sequestration of City of Bellflower trees is about 202.6 tons of carbon per year with an associated value of $87.7 thousand. See Appendix I for more details on methods.

A
A
A
b
-4
-3
-2
e���`� ¢ �•`� c��v �\ 03 s' oa o ¢ygQ o oat �� o`�a �`,¢� e��J�' �o c �J ` c
S ��
c�Q ON `T��e �`a� e -, 'r �.N' �c,;,.\
S �e`
\ fib' .)
Species
�,o
o t`
v¢
c
co
o
r
al
7 Figure 8. Estimated annual gross carbon sequestration (points) and value (bars) for urban tree species with the greatest sequestration, City of Bellflower
Carbon storage is another way trees can influence global climate change. As a tree grows, it stores more carbon by holding it in its accumulated tissue. Asa tree dies and decays, it releases much of the stored carbon back into the atmosphere. Thus, carbon storage is an indication of the amount of carbon that can be released if trees are allowed to die and decompose. Maintaining healthy trees will keep the carbon stored in trees, but tree maintenance can contribute to carbon emissions (Nowak et al 2002c). When a tree dies, using the wood in long-term wood products, to heat buildings, or to produce energy will help reduce carbon emissions from wood decomposition or from fossil - fuel or wood -based power plants.

244

Trees in City of Bellflower are estimated to store 4660 tons of carbon ($2.02 million). Of the species sampled, Wilga; australian willow stores the most carbon (approximately 20.1% of the total carbon stored) and Common crapemyrtle sequesters the most (approximately 9.07% of all sequestered carbon.) c
o
a
ao
(15
S-
4-,
1000
900
800
700
600
500
400
300
200
100
— 450
- 400
- 350
- 300
- 250
- 200
- 150
- 100
- 50
-0
-4) e`'ee' ' cyg'c' fi� e �`�ooa `,1y\ar °ie`'Q o,\�°ate arc°�a ea�c, {a\� Or��. `awe `tke �e`�° � �`', ,�. etch `'`e�,
J
o� •oJ7,46
�� o`er
�\�a a Low J�0, c •ems
O
Species
tn.
c
0 al
Figure 9. Estimated carbon storage (points) and values (bars) for urban tree species with the greatest storage, City of Bellflower

245

V. Oxygen Production
Oxygen production is one of the most commonly cited benefits of urban trees. The annual oxygen production of a tree is directly related to the amount of carbon sequestered by the tree, which is tied to the accumulation of tree biomass.

Trees in City of Bellflower are estimated to produce 540.4 tons of oxygen per year.4 However, this tree benefit is relatively insignificant because of the large and relatively stable amount of oxygen in the atmosphere and extensive production by aquatic systems. Our atmosphere has an enormous reserve of oxygen. If all fossil fuel reserves, all trees, and all organic matter in soils were burned, atmospheric oxygen would only drop a few percent (Broecker 1970).

Table 2. The top 20 oxygen production species.

Species
Gross Carbon
Oxygen Sequestration Number of Trees Leaf Area
(ton) (ton/yr) (acre)
Common crapemyrtle
Chinese elm
Callery pear
Wilga; australian willow
Outeniqua yellowwood
Sycamore spp
Holly oak
Southern magnolia
Glossy privet
Lemonscented gum
Vinegartree
Chinese pistache
Punk tree
Kurrajong
African sumac
Pear spp
New zealand chrstmas tree
Hollyleaf cherry
Shamel ash
Xylosma spp

48.99 43.30

40.61 30.43

25.49 20.73

19.47 19.44

16.76 15.54

14.14 12.55

12.20 12.16

11.78 11.32

11.28 10.65

9.63 7.99

18.37 16.24

15.23 11.41

9.56 7.77

7.30 7.29

6.28 5.83

5.30 4.71

4.57 4.56

4.42 4.24

4.23 3.99

3.61 3.00
1,115
234
501
690
369
327
183
236
289
40 107
211
94 147
203
219
48 110
156
101

35.55 21.51

36.86 52.21

30.69 45.44

23.82 26.81

23.34 11.91

9.21 7.49

12.22 12.76

5.72 14.51

7.53 5.39

13.12 4.54

246

VI. Avoided Runoff
Surface runoff can be a cause for concern in many urban areas as it can contribute pollution to streams, wetlands, rivers, lakes, and oceans. During precipitation events, some portion of the precipitation is intercepted by vegetation (trees and shrubs) while the other portion reaches the ground. The portion of the precipitation that reaches the ground and does not infiltrate into the soil becomes surface runoff (Hirabayashi 2012). In urban areas, the large extent of impervious surfaces increases the amount of surface runoff.

Urban trees and shrubs, however, are beneficial in reducing surface runoff. Trees and shrubs intercept precipitation, while their root systems promote infiltration and storage in the soil. The trees and shrubs of City of Bellflower help to reduce runoff by an estimated 678 thousand gallons a year with an associated value of $6.1 thousand (see Appendix I for more details). Avoided runoff is estimated based on local weather from the user -designated weather station. In City of Bellflower, the total annual precipitation in 2024 was 19.4 inches. 65 c 60
o
b.0 55
13 cs 50
J
o 45
t
40 o
c
35 cr
73 al - 30
o
d25
20 •
I 1
-
1 T T
-° e.4." _� �a. `�- ooa o�`a oar tee` N.% o a
e" �J f` J e �"r
�`�`�• O J`a<c' C.a\\e� dZQe0�,e\\o�3 e` �a� N213 �\o4' Lr. ` �e5 4e �• `
O�
Species
600
550
500
450
400
350
300 7
250
200
150
100
50 0
Figure 10. Avoided runoff (points) and value (bars) for species with greatest overall impact on runoff, City of Bellflower

247

VII. Trees and Building Energy Use
Trees affect energy consumption by shading buildings, providing evaporative cooling, and blocking winter winds.

Trees tend to reduce building energy consumption in the summer months and can either increase or decrease building energy use in the winter months, depending on the location of trees around the building. Estimates of tree effects on energy use are based on field measurements of tree distance and direction to space conditioned residential buildings (McPherson and Simpson 1999).

Because energy -related data were not collected, energy savings and carbon avoided cannot be calculated.

Table 3. Annual energy savings due to trees near residential buildings, City of Bellflower Heating
Cooling Total
MBTUa
MWHb
Carbon Avoided (pounds)
o
o
o
N/A
o
o
o
o
o
'MBTU - one million British Thermal Units
bMWH - megawatt -hour
Table 4. Annual savings a($) in residential energy expenditure during heating and cooling seasons, City of Bellflower Heating
Cooling Total
MBTUb
MWH`
Carbon Avoided
o
o
o
N/A
o
o
o
o
o
bBased on the prices of $350.3 per MWH and $21.020000058842 per MBTU (see Appendix I for more details) `MBTU - one million British Thermal Units
'MWH - megawatt -hour
Trees modify climate, produce shade, and reduce wind speeds. Increased energy use or costs are likely due to these tree -building interactions creating a cooling effect during the winter season. For example, a tree (particularly evergreen species) located on the southern side of a residential building may produce a shading effect that causes increases in heating requirements.

248

VIII. Replacement and Functional Values
Urban forests have a replacement value based on the trees themselves (e.g., the cost of having to replace a tree with a similar tree); they also have functional values (either positive or negative) based on the functions the trees perform.

The replacement value of an urban forest tends to increase with a rise in the number and size of healthy trees (Nowak et al 2002a). Annual functional values also tend to increase with increased number and size of healthy trees.

Through proper management, urban forest values can be increased; however, the values and benefits also can decrease as the amount of healthy tree cover declines.

Urban trees in City of Bellflower have the following replacement values:
• Replacement value: $37 million
• Carbon storage: $2.02 million
Urban trees in City of Bellflower have the following annual functional values:
• Carbon sequestration: $87.7 thousand
• Avoided runoff: $6.06 thousand
• Pollution removal: $61.8 thousand
• Energy costs and carbon emission values: $0
(Note: negative value indicates increased energy cost and carbon emission value) 6—
y
Vl
a
U
-L
i T T 1 1 t T
OS' Nk-
Z
`�Qett`
LZ�1�O e\\o� ale r``1e `�t2 Of,
C. C, c (�
Species
Figure 11. Tree species with the greatest replacement value, City of Bellflower

249

IX. Potential Pest Impacts
Various insects and diseases can infest urban forests, potentially killing trees and reducing the health, replacement value and sustainability of the urban forest. As pests tend to have differing tree hosts, the potential damage or risk of each pest will differ among cities.Fifty-three pests were analyzed for their potential impact and compared with pest range maps (Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team 2014) for the conterminous United States to determine their proximity to Los Angeles County. Nine of the fifty-three pests analyzed are located within the county. For a complete analysis of all pests, see Appendix VII.
3500
30rj0
ti 2500
cu
2000
o
- 1500
G
z
1000
500
0 m
a.
2 Pest
ii
15 10
Replacement Value ($ millions)
Figure 12. Number of trees at risk (points) and associated compensatory value (bars) for most threatening pests located in the county, City of Bellflower
One common pest of white fir, grand fir, and red fir trees is the fir engraver (FE) (Ferrell 1986). FE poses a threat to

0.0 percent of the City of Bellflower urban forest, which represents a potential loss of $0 in replacement value.

Infestations of the goldspotted oak borer (GSOB) (Society of American Foresters 2011) have been a growing problem in southern California. Potential loss of trees from GSOB is 0.1 percent ($60.8 thousand in replacement value).

Heterobasidion Root Disease (HRD) poses a threat to 0.0 percent of the City of Bellflower urban forest, which represents a potential loss of $0 in replacement value.

The Jeffrey pine beetle (JPB) (Smith et al 2009) is native to North America and is distributed across California, Nevada, and Oregon where its only host, Jeffrey pine, also occurs. This pest threatens 0.0 percent of the population, which represents a potential loss of $0 in replacement value.

Mountain pine beetle (MPB) (Gibson et al 2009) is a bark beetle that primarily attacks pine species in the western United States. MPB has the potential to affect 0.0 percent of the population ($0 in replacement value).

250

Polyphagous shot hole borer (PSHB) (University of California 2014) is a boring beetle that was first detected in California. City of Bellflower could possibly lose 39.6 percent of its trees to this pest ($17.5 million in replacement value).

Thousand canker disease (TCD) (Cranshaw and Tisserat 2009; Seybold et al 2010) is an insect -disease complex that kills several species of walnuts, including black walnut. Potential loss of trees from TCD is 0.3 percent ($144 thousand in replacement value).

Western Five -Needle Pine Mortality (WFNPM) poses a threat to 0.0 percent of the City of Bellflower urban forest, which represents a potential loss of $0 in replacement value.

The western pine beetle (WPB) (DeMars and Roettgering 1982) is a bark beetle and aggressive attacker of ponderosa and Coulter pines. This pest threatens 0.0 percent of the population, which represents a potential loss of $0 in replacement value.

251

Appendix I. i-Tree Eco Model and Field Measurements
i-Tree Eco is designed to use standardized field data and local hourly air pollution and meteorological data to quantify urban forest structure and its numerous effects (Nowak and Crane 2000), including:
• Urban forest structure (e.g., species composition, tree health, leaf area, etc.). • Amount of pollution removed hourly by the urban forest, and its associated percent air quality improvement throughout a year.
• Total carbon stored and net carbon annually sequestered by the urban forest. • Effects of trees on building energy use and consequent effects on carbon dioxide emissions from power sources.
• Replacement value of the forest, as well as the value for air pollution removal and carbon storage and sequestration.
• Potential impact of infestations by pests, such as Asian longhorned beetle, emerald ash borer, spongy moth, and Dutch elm disease.

Typically, all field data are collected during the leaf -on season to properly assess tree canopies. Typical data collection (actual data collection may vary depending upon the user) includes land use, ground and tree cover, individual tree attributes of species, stem diameter, height, crown width, crown canopy missing and dieback, and distance and direction to residential buildings (Nowak et al 2005; Nowak et al 2008).

During data collection, trees are identified to the most specific taxonomic classification possible. Trees that are not classified to the species level may be classified by genus (e.g., ash) or species groups (e.g., hardwood). In this report, tree species, genera, or species groups are collectively referred to as tree species.

Tree Characteristics:

Leaf area of trees was assessed using measurements of crown dimensions and percentage of crown canopy missing.

In the event that these data variables were not collected, they are estimated by the model.

An analysis of invasive species is not available for studies outside of the United States. For the U.S., invasive species are identified using an invasive species list (California Invasive Species Advisory Committee 2010)for the state in which the urban forest is located. These lists are not exhaustive and they cover invasive species of varying degrees of invasiveness and distribution. In instances where a state did not have an invasive species list, a list was created based on the lists of the adjacent states. Tree species that are identified as invasive by the state invasive species list are cross-referenced with native range data. This helps eliminate species that are on the state invasive species list, but are native to the study area.

Air Pollution Removal:

Pollution removal is calculated for ozone, sulfur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide, carbon monoxide, particulate matter less than 2.5 microns, and particulate matter less than 10 microns and greater than 2.5 microns. PM2.5 is generally more relevant in discussions concerning air pollution effects on human health.

Air pollution removal estimates are derived from calculated hourly tree -canopy resistances for ozone, and sulfur and nitrogen dioxides based on a hybrid of big -leaf and multi -layer canopy deposition models (Baldocchi 1988; Baldocchi et al 1987). As the removal of carbon monoxide and particulate matter by vegetation is not directly related to transpiration, removal rates (deposition velocities) for these pollutants were based on average measured values from the literature (Bidwell and Fraser 1972; Lovett 1994) that were adjusted depending on leaf phenology and leaf area.

Particulate removal incorporated a 50 percent resuspension rate of particles back to the atmosphere (Zinke 1967).

Recent updates (2011) to air quality modeling are based on improved leaf area index simulations, weather and

252

pollution processing and interpolation, and updated pollutant monetary values (Hirabayashi et al 2011; Hirabayashi et al 2012; Hirabayashi 2011).

Trees remove PM2.5 and PM10* when particulate matter is deposited on leaf surfaces (Nowak et al 2013). This deposited PM2.5 and PM10* can be resuspended to the atmosphere or removed during rain events and dissolved or transferred to the soil. This combination of events can lead to positive or negative pollution removal and value depending on various atmospheric factors. Generally, PM2.5 and PM10* removal is positive with positive benefits.

However, there are some cases when net removal is negative or resuspended particles lead to increased pollution concentrations and negative values. During some months (e.g., with no rain), trees resuspend more particles than they remove. Resuspension can also lead to increased overall PM2.5 and PM10* concentrations if the boundary layer conditions are lower during net resuspension periods than during net removal periods. Since the pollution removal value is based on the change in pollution concentration, it is possible to have situations when trees remove PM2.5 and PM10* but increase concentrations and thus have negative values during periods of positive overall removal.

These events are not common, but can happen.

For reports in the United States, default air pollution removal value is calculated based on local incidence of adverse health effects and national median externality costs. The number of adverse health effects and associated economic value is calculated for ozone, sulfur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide, and particulate matter less than 2.5 microns using data from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Environmental Benefits Mapping and Analysis Program (BenMAP) (Nowak et al 2014). The model uses a damage -function approach that is based on the local change in pollution concentration and population. National median externality costs were used to calculate the value of carbon monoxide removal (Murray et al 1994).

For international reports, user -defined local pollution values are used. For international reports that do not have local values, estimates are based on either European median externality values (van Essen et al 2011) or BenMAP regression equations (Nowak et al 2014) that incorporate user -defined population estimates. Values are then converted to local currency with user -defined exchange rates.

For this analysis, pollution removal value is calculated based on the prices of $1,858 per ton (carbon monoxide), $14,519 per ton (ozone), $2,837 per ton (nitrogen dioxide), $921 per ton (sulfur dioxide), $757,436 per ton (particulate matter less than 2.5 microns), $8,733 per ton (particulate matter less than 10 microns and greater than

2.5 microns).

Carbon Storage and Sequestration:

Carbon storage is the amount of carbon bound up in the above -ground and below -ground parts of woody vegetation.

To calculate current carbon storage, biomass for each tree was calculated using equations from the literature and measured tree data. Open -grown, maintained trees tend to have less biomass than predicted by forest -derived biomass equations (Nowak 1994). To adjust for this difference, biomass results for open -grown urban trees were multiplied by 0.8. No adjustment was made for trees found in natural stand conditions. Tree dry -weight biomass was converted to stored carbon by multiplying by 0.5.

Carbon sequestration is the removal of carbon dioxide from the air by plants. To estimate the gross amount of carbon sequestered annually, average diameter growth from the appropriate genera and diameter class and tree condition was added to the existing tree diameter (year x) to estimate tree diameter and carbon storage in year x+1.

Carbon storage and carbon sequestration values are based on estimated or customized local carbon values. For international reports that do not have local values, estimates are based on the carbon value for the United States (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 2015, Interagency Working Group on Social Cost of Carbon 2015) and converted to local currency with user -defined exchange rates.

253

For this analysis, carbon storage and carbon sequestration values are calculated based on $433 per ton.

Oxygen Production:

The amount of oxygen produced is estimated from carbon sequestration based on atomic weights: net O2 release (kg/yr) = net C sequestration (kg/yr) x 32/12. To estimate the net carbon sequestration rate, the amount of carbon sequestered as a result of tree growth is reduced by the amount lost resulting from tree mortality. Thus, net carbon sequestration and net annual oxygen production of the urban forest account for decomposition (Nowak et al 2007).

For complete inventory projects, oxygen production is estimated from gross carbon sequestration and does not account for decomposition.

Avoided Runoff:

Annual avoided surface runoff is calculated based on rainfall interception by vegetation, specifically the difference between annual runoff with and without vegetation. Although tree leaves, branches, and bark may intercept precipitation and thus mitigate surface runoff, only the precipitation intercepted by leaves is accounted for in this analysis.

The value of avoided runoff is based on estimated or user -defined local values. For international reports that do not have local values, the national average value for the United States is utilized and converted to local currency with user -defined exchange rates. The U.S. value of avoided runoff is based on the U.S. Forest Service's Community Tree Guide Series (McPherson et al 1999; 2000; 2001; 2002; 2003; 2004; 2006a; 2006b; 2006c; 2007; 2010; Peper et al 2009; 2010; Vargas et al 2007a; 2007b; 2008).

For this analysis, avoided runoff value is calculated based on the price of $0.01 per gallon.

Building Energy Use:

If appropriate field data were collected, seasonal effects of trees on residential building energy use were calculated based on procedures described in the literature (McPherson and Simpson 1999) using distance and direction of trees from residential structures, tree height and tree condition data. To calculate the monetary value of energy savings, local or custom prices per MWH or MBTU are utilized.

For this analysis, energy saving value is calculated based on the prices of $350.30 per MWH and $21.02 per MBTU.

Replacement Values:

Replacement value is the value of a tree based on the physical resource itself (e.g., the cost of having to replace a tree with a similar tree). Replacement values were based on valuation procedures of the Council of Tree and Landscape Appraisers, which uses tree species, diameter, condition, and location information (Nowak et al 2002a; 2002b).

Replacement value may not be included for international projects if there is insufficient local data to complete the valuation procedures.

Potential Pest Impacts:

The complete potential pest risk analysis is not available for studies outside of the United States. The number of trees at risk to the pests analyzed is reported, though the list of pests is based on known insects and disease in the United States.

For the U.S., potential pest risk is based on pest range maps and the known pest host species that are likely to

254

experience mortality. Pest range maps for 2012 from the Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team (FHTET) (Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team 2014) were used to determine the proximity of each pest to the county in which the urban forest is located. For the county, it was established whether the insect/disease occurs within the county, is within 250 miles of the county edge, is between 250 and 750 miles away, or is greater than 750 miles away. FHTET did not have pest range maps for Dutch elm disease and chestnut blight. The range of these pests was based on known occurrence and the host range, respectively (Eastern Forest Environmental Threat Assessment Center; Worrall 2007).

Relative Tree Effects:

The relative value of tree benefits reported in Appendix II is calculated to show what carbon storage and sequestration, and air pollutant removal equate to in amounts of municipal carbon emissions, passenger automobile emissions, and house emissions.

Municipal carbon emissions are based on 2010 U.S. per capita carbon emissions (Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center 2010). Per capita emissions were multiplied by city population to estimate total city carbon emissions.

Light duty vehicle emission rates (g/mi) for CO, NOx, VOCs, PM10, SO2 for 2010 (Bureau of Transportation Statistics 2010; Heirigs et al 2004), PM2.5 for 2011-2015 (California Air Resources Board 2013), and CO2 for 2011 (U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency 2010) were multiplied by average miles driven per vehicle in 2011 (Federal Highway Administration 2013) to determine average emissions per vehicle.

Household emissions are based on average electricity kWh usage, natural gas Btu usage, fuel oil Btu usage, kerosene Btu usage, LPG Btu usage, and wood Btu usage per household in 2009 (Energy Information Administration 2013; Energy Information Administration 2014)
• CO2, SO2, and NOx power plant emission per KWh are from Leonardo Academy 2011. CO emission per kWh assumes 1/3 of one percent of C emissions is CO based on Energy Information Administration 1994. PM10 emission per kWh from Layton 2004.
• CO2, NOx, SO2, and CO emission per Btu for natural gas, propane and butane (average used to represent LPG), Fuel #4 and #6 (average used to represent fuel oil and kerosene) from Leonardo Academy 2011. • CO2 emissions per Btu of wood from Energy Information Administration 2014. • CO, NOx and SOx emission per Btu based on total emissions and wood burning (tons) from (British Columbia Ministry 2005; Georgia Forestry Commission 2009).

255

Appendix II. Relative Tree Effects
The urban forest in City of Bellflower provides benefits that include carbon storage and sequestration, and air pollutant removal. To estimate the relative value of these benefits, tree benefits were compared to estimates of average municipal carbon emissions, average passenger automobile emissions, and average household emissions.

See Appendix I for methodology.

Carbon storage is ec
uivalent to:
• Amount of carbon emitted in City of Bellflower in 4 days • Annual carbon (C) emissions from 3,300 automobiles
• Annual C emissions from 1,350 single-family houses
Carbon monoxide removal is equivalent to:
• Annual carbon monoxide emissions from 1 automobiles
• Annual carbon monoxide emissions from 3 single-family houses Nitrogen dioxide removal is equivalent to:
• Annual nitrogen dioxide emissions from 53 automobiles • Annual nitrogen dioxide emissions from 24 single-family houses Sulfur dioxide removal is equivalent to:
• Annual sulfur dioxide emissions from 250 automobiles
• Annual sulfur dioxide emissions from 1 single-family houses Annual carbon sequestration is equivalent to:
• Amount of carbon emitted in City of Bellflower in 0.2 days • Annual Cemissions from 143 automobiles
• Annual Cemissions from 59 single-family houses

256

Appendix III. Comparison of Urban Forests
A common question asked is, "How does this city compare to other cities?" Although comparison among cities should be made with caution as there are many attributes of a city that affect urban forest structure and functions, summary data are provided from other cities analyzed using the i-Tree Eco model.

I. City totals for trees
City
% Tree Cover
Number of Trees
Carbon Storage
(tons)
Carbon Sequestration
(tons/yr)
Pollution Removal
(tons/yr)
Toronto, ON, Canada

26.6 10,220,000
1,221,000
51,500
2,099
Atlanta, GA

36.7 9,415,000
1,344,000
46,400
1,663
Los Angeles, CA

11.1 5,993,000
1,269,000
77,000
1,975
New York, NY

20.9 5,212,000
1,350,000
42,300
1,676
London, ON, Canada

24.7 4,376,000
396,000
13,700
408
Chicago, IL

17.2 3,585,000
716,000
25,200
888
Phoenix, AZ

9.0 3,166,000
315,000
32,800
563
Baltimore, MD

21.0 2,479,000
570,000
18,400
430
Philadelphia, PA

15.7 2,113,000
530,000
16,100
575
Washington, DC

28.6 1,928,000
525,000
16,200
418
Oakville, ON , Canada

29.1 1,908,000
147,000
6,600
190
Albuquerque, NM

14.3 1,846,000
332,000
10,600
248
Boston, MA

22.3 1,183,000
319,000
10,500
283
Syracuse, NY

26.9 1,088,000
183,000
5,900
109
Woodbridge, NJ

29.5 986,000
160,000
5,600
210
Minneapolis, MN

26.4 979,000
250,000
8,900
305
San Francisco, CA

11.9 668,000
194,000
5,100
141
Morgantown, WV

35.5 658,000
93,000
2,900
72 Moorestown, NJ

28.0 583,000
117,000
3,800
118
Hartford, CT

25.9 568,000
143,000
4,300
58 Jersey City, NJ

11.5 136,000
21,000
890
41 Casper, WY

8.9 123,000
37,000
1,200
37 Freehold, NJ

34.4 48,000
20,000
540
22 II. Totals per acre of land area
City
Number of Trees/ac
Carbon Storage
(tons/ac)
Carbon Sequestration
(tons/ac/yr)
Pollution Removal
(Ib/ac/yr)
Toronto, ON, Canada

64.9 7.8

0.33 26.7
Atlanta, GA
111.6

15.9 0.55

39.4 Los Angeles, CA

19.6 4.2

0.16 13.1
New York, NY

26.4 6.8

0.21 17.0
London, ON, Canada

75.1 6.8

0.24 14.0
Chicago, IL

24.2 4.8

0.17 12.0
Phoenix, AZ

12.9 1.3

0.13 4.6
Baltimore, MD

48.0 11.1

0.36 16.6
Philadelphia, PA

25.1 6.3

0.19 13.6
Washington, DC

49.0 13.3

0.41 21.2
Oakville, ON , Canada

78.1 6.0

0.27 11.0
Albuquerque, NM

21.8 3.9

0.12 5.9
Boston, MA

33.5 9.1

0.30 16.1
Syracuse, NY

67.7 10.3

0.34 13.6
Woodbridge, NJ

66.5 10.8

0.38 28.4
Minneapolis, MN

26.2 6.7

0.24 16.3
San Francisco, CA

22.5 6.6

0.17 9.5
Morgantown, WV
119.2

16.8 0.52

26.0 Moorestown, NJ

62.1 12.4

0.40 25.1
Hartford, CT

50.4 12.7

0.38 10.2
Jersey City, NJ

14.4 2.2

0.09 8.6
Casper, WY

9.1 2.8

0.09 5.5
Freehold, NJ

38.3 16.0

0.44 35.3

257

Appendix IV. General Recommendations for Air Quality Improvement Urban vegetation can directly and indirectly affect local and regional air quality by altering the urban atmosphere environment. Four main ways that urban trees affect air quality are (Nowak 1995):
• Temperature reduction and other microclimate effects
• Removal of air pollutants
• Emission of volatile organic compounds (VOC) and tree maintenance emissions • Energy effects on buildings
The cumulative and interactive effects of trees on climate, pollution removal, and VOC and power plant emissions determine the impact of trees on air pollution. Cumulative studies involving urban tree impacts on ozone have revealed that increased urban canopy cover, particularly with low VOC emitting species, leads to reduced ozone concentrations in cities (Nowak 2000). Local urban management decisions also can help improve air quality.

Urban forest management strategies to help improve air quality include (Nowak 2000):

Strategy
Result
Increase the number of healthy trees
Increase pollution removal
Sustain existing tree cover
Maintain pollution removal levels
Maximize use of low VOC-emitting trees
Reduces ozone and carbon monoxide formation
Sustain large, healthy trees
Large trees have greatest per -tree effects
Use long-lived trees
Reduce long-term pollutant emissions from
planting and removal
Use low maintenance trees
Reduce pollutants emissions from maintenance
activities
Reduce fossil fuel use in maintaining vegetation
Reduce pollutant emissions
Plant trees in energy conserving locations
Reduce pollutant emissions from power plants
Plant trees to shade parked cars
Reduce vehicular VOC emissions
Supply ample water to vegetation
Enhance pollution removal and temperature
reduction
Plant trees in polluted or heavily populated areas
Maximizes tree air quality benefits
Avoid pollutant -sensitive species
Improve tree health
Utilize evergreen trees for particulate matter
Year-round removal of particles

258

Appendix V. Invasive Species of the Urban Forest
The following inventoried tree species were listed as invasive on the California invasive species list (California Invasive Species Advisory Committee 2010):

Species Namea
Number of Trees % of Trees Leaf Area
(ac)
Percent Leaf Area
Punk tree 94
Chinese tallowtree 32
California peppertree 10
Tree of heaven 3
Blue gum eucalyptus 1
Total 140

1.1 0.4

0.1 0.0

0.0 1.70

12.2 1.6

0.8 0.4

0.4 15.36

2.1 0.3

0.1 0.1

0.1 2.69
aSpecies are determined to be invasive if they are listed on the state's invasive species list

259

Appendix VI. Potential Risk of Pests
Fifty-three insects and diseases were analyzed to quantify their potential impact on the urban forest. As each insect/ disease is likely to attack different host tree species, the implications for {0} will vary. The number of trees at risk reflects only the known host species that are likely to experience mortality.

Code Scientific Name
Common Name
Trees at Risk Value
(#) ($ thousands)
AL Phyllocnistis populiella Aspen Leafminer
ALB Anoplophora glabripennis Asian Longhorned Beetle
ARCA Neodothiora populina Aspen Running Canker
ARD Armillaria spp. Armillaria Root Disease
BBD Neonectria faginata Beech Bark Disease
BC Ophiognomonia clavigignenti- Butternut Canker
juglandacearum
BLD Litylenchus crenatae mccannii Beech Leaf Disease
BM Euproctis chrysorrhoea Browntail Moth
BOB Tubakia iowensis Bur Oak Blight
BSRD Leptographium wageneri Black Stain Root Disease
BWA Adelges piceae Balsam Woolly Adelgid
CB Cryphonectria parasitica Chestnut Blight
DA Discula destructiva Dogwood Anthracnose
DBSR Leptographium wageneri var. Douglas -fir Black Stain Root pseudotsugae Disease
DED Ophiostoma novo-ulmi Dutch Elm Disease
DFB Dendroctonus pseudotsugae Douglas -Fir Beetle
EAB Agrilus planipennis Emerald Ash Borer
FE Scolytus ventralis Fir Engraver
FR Cronartium quercuum f. sp. Fusiform Rust
Fusiforme
FTC Malacosoma disstria Forest Tent Caterpillar
GSOB Agrilus auroguttatus Goldspotted Oak Borer
HRD Heterobasidion irregulare/ Heterobasidion Root Disease occidentale
HS Neodiprion tsugae Hemlock Sawfly
HWA Adelges tsugae Hemlock Woolly Adelgid
JPB Dendroctonus jeffreyi Jeffrey Pine Beetle
JPBW Choristoneura pinus Jack Pine Budworm
LAT Choristoneura conflictana Large Aspen Tortrix
LWD Raffaelea lauricola Laurel Wilt
MOB Xyleborus monographus Mediterranean Oak Borer
MPB Dendroctonus ponderosae Mountain Pine Beetle
NSE Ips perturbatus Northern Spruce Engraver
OW Bretziella fagacearum Oak Wilt
PBSR Leptographium wageneri var. Pine Black Stain Root Disease ponderosum
POCRD Phytophthora lateralis Port -Orford -Cedar Root Disease PSB Tomicus piniperda Pine Shoot Beetle
o 0.00
519 2,953.44
O 0.00
2 17.08
O 0.00
O 0.00
O 0.00
227 899.03
O 0.00
O 0.00
O 0.00
O 0.00
O 0.00
o 0.00
7 27.27
o 0.00
180 1,576.48
O 0.00
O 0.00
9 11
0 21.31

60.76 0.00
O 0.00
O 0.00
O 0.00
O 0.00
2 3.79
33 136.64
2 4.41
o 0.00
o 0.00
196 1,354.88
O 0.00
1 123

0.05 1,159.85

260

Code Scientific Name
Common Name
Trees at Risk Value
(#) ($ thousands)
PS H B
RPS
SB
SBW
SFM
SLF
SOD
SPB
SW
TCD
WBB
WBBU
WFNPM
WM
WPB
WPBR
WSB
Euwallacea nov. sp.

Matsucoccus resinosae
Dendroctonus rufipennis
Choristoneura fumiferana
subalpine fir mortality summary
Lycorma delicatula
Phytophthora ramorum
Dendroctonus frontalis
Sirex noctilio
Geosmithia morbida
Dryocoetes confusus
Acleris gloverana
western five -needle pine
mortality summary
Operophtera brumata
Dendroctonus brevicomis
Cronartium ribicola
Choristoneura occidentalis
Polyphagous Shot Hole Borer
Red Pine Scale
Spruce Beetle
Spruce Budworm
Subalpine Fir Mortality
Spotted Lanternfly
Sudden Oak Death
Southern Pine Beetle
Sirex Wood Wasp
Thousand Canker Disease
Western Balsam Bark Beetle
Western Blackheaded Budworm
Western Five -Needle Pine
Mortality
Winter Moth
Western Pine Beetle
White Pine Blister Rust
Western Spruce Budworm
3,261
15 1
1 0
829
481
124
123
23 17,497.67

49.78 0.49

0.49 0.00
3,407.76
2,424.77
1,160.34
1,159.85
143.78
O 0.00
O 0.00
O 0.00
58 0
0 1
384.47

0.00 0.00

0.49

261

In the following graph, the pests are color coded according to the county's proximity to the pest occurrence in the United States. Red indicates that the pest is within the county; orange indicates that the pest is within 250 miles of the county; yellow indicates that the pest is within 750 miles of the county; and green indicates that the pest is outside of these ranges.
3500 —
3000 -
d 2500 -
3 > 2000 -
C
1500 -
m
Tai woo -
cc
500
0 450
400
350-
• 300 -
250 -
d 200 -
ra
a 150 -
w
x 100-
50 -
0 LLI
LL
1 t t
m o 0
0 C a
•
— 20
c
0 - 15
E
d
10�
a
E
d
-5
n
cc
—0
2500
Tn.;
2000 ri
0 - 1500
- 1000
00=0 U H 0 '2 O a m m 0
oo ri 5 ,LL„ o, in 3 a 3
500
E
V
V
N
V
cc
200
150
V
3 100
E
U
V
d
ct 50
0 900 —
800 -
vi
700-
S' 600-
A
500 -
c
E 400 -
m
A 300 -
V
cc 200
100 -
3 0
67-1
0]
W
m
O
2 r
0 U
0 a
.Vmm mO
SmQ LL2agO/,3mag±32
aQm coma,
3a3zoa� `^�m3
Note: points - Number of trees, bars - Replacement value 3 1600
1400-6
c
V
1200 c
z
1000,;,
d
800 3
600
V
E
400 V
V
200 s
C
0 3500
- 3000
V
2500 '0
- 2000 d
To
—1500
d
- 1000 d
- 500 d
0

262

Based on the host tree species for each pest and the current range of the pest (Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team 2014), it is possible to determine what the risk is that each tree species in the urban forest could be attacked by an insect or disease.

Ith
13 Coastal live oak
10 Blue spruce
di9
European white birch
8 Holly oak
8 Black walnut
8 Camphor tree
8 Elm spp
7 Velvet ash
6 Shamel ash
6 Trident maple
6 Japanese black pine
6 Japanese maple
6 Peach
6 Persian silk tree
6 Live oak
5 Chinese elm
5 Japanese zelkova
5 Canary island pine
5 Avocado
5 Aleppo pine
5 Italian stone pine
5 White mulberry
5 Chinese juniper
5 Chinaberry
5 Common fig
5 American sycamore
5 Tree of heaven
5 Afghan pine
I5
5 Pagoda tree
Fremont cottonwood
4 Callery pear
4 Outeniqua
yellowwood
4 Southern magnolia
4 Chinese pistache
4 Kurrajong
4 Blue jacaranda
4 Chinese flame tree
i
4 King palm
4 Sweetgum
d
4 Mountain ebony
Pap: 30
263

N
d1ft'g
Q
Ln
'
3 g c•
VJ Z
aa�c.
a

2.RImm�3v0moonLLLLL�0c`= ?mg32IZom
m
o_
a
a
4 Honeylocust
4 Carrotwood
4 California sycamore
4 Goldenrain tree
4 Benjamin fig
4 Mexican fan palm
4 Chinese tallowtree
4 Chinese fringe tree
4 Olive
4 Loquat tree
4 Common guava
4 Lemon
4 California peppertree
4 Cape chesnut
4 Sweetshade
4 Strawberry tree
4 Naked coral tree
4 Weeping bottlebrush
4 Siberian elm
il
4 Gold medallion tree
4 Frangipani
4 California palm
4 Pride of bolivia
4 Australian pine
4 Silk floss tree
4 Saucer magnolia
4 Carolina laurelcherry
4 Redflower gum
4 Sliver dollar
eucalyptus
4 Kaffir plum
4 Sweet cherry
4 Babylon weeping
willow
4 African tulip tree
4 Giant thevetia
4 Toog
4 Jelly palm
4 Canafistula
4 Northern catalpa
4 Atlas cedar
4 Green ash
4 Macadamia nut
4 4
Siala
4 Dawn redwood

264

N
a
v�
Y
d°�al
E
v, Z
aaccammmmm,n3vomo-n-..L
91=3m.
?mg3oaZom
4 Jerusalem thorn
4 Blackbead spp
4 Chilean mesquite
4 Purple wisteria
3 Pear spp
3 Fraser photinia
3 Vinegartree
3 Toyon
3 Citrus spp
3 Apple spp
3 Coast redwood
3 Silver maple
3 Incense cedar
3 Bay laurel
3 Northern white cedar
III
2 Narrow -leafed ash
1 Glossy privet
1 Black locust
1 Northern hackberry
1 Pomegranate
1 Apricot
1 Common plum
1 Oriental arborvitae
1 Black tupelo
��
a
O. 3cil
C2 d

0.,
vO. lz
VO
a
d
v=
a
vi
m
�,
O
N
N
°�
33 m
Z
3 a
333
a
m^
13 Coastal live oak
10 Blue spruce
9 European white birch
8 Holly oak
8 Black walnut
8 Camphor tree
8 Elm spp
7 Velvet ash
6 Shamel ash
6 Trident maple
6 Japanese black pine
6 Japanese maple
6 Peach
6 Persian silk tree
6 Live oak
5 Chinese elm
5 Japanese zelkova
5 Canary island pine
5 Avocado
Pap: 32
265

Y
N
.0
n
N
' 3
N d
c
vai z
3 d
®
a
=
2 K
m
3 3
,
LL
v)
O
®
v,
v,~
a
m
3 m
G
,2
3 m
3 m

m
3 5
Aleppo pine
5 Italian stone pine
5 White mulberry
5 Chinese juniper
5 Chinaberry
5 Common fig
il
5 American sycamore
5 Tree of heaven
5 Afghan pine
5 Pagoda tree
5 Fremont cottonwood
4 Callery pear
4 Outeniqua
yellowwood
4 Southern magnolia
4 Chinese pistache
4 Kurrajong
4 Blue jacaranda
4 Chinese flame tree
4 King palm
4 Sweetgum
4 Mountain ebony
4 Honeylocust
4 Carrotwood
4 California sycamore
4 Goldenrain tree
4 Benjamin fig
4 Mexican fan palm
4 Chinese tallowtree
4 Chinese fringe tree
4 Olive
4 Loquat tree
4 Common guava
4 Lemon
4 California peppertree
4 Cape chesnut
4 Sweetshade
4 Strawberry tree
4 Naked coral tree
4 Weeping bottlebrush
li
4 Siberian elm
4 Gold medallion tree
4 Frangipani
4 California palm
4 Pride of bolivia
Pap: 33
266

N
E
na

0. 1,1
N
Y m
cc
m d
E
Z
3®
0 a
a
m
2 K
-,,
LL
v)
o®

0.1 3
V,
a
m
3 m
a

m
3 m
m
.,
4 Australian pine
4 Silk floss tree
4 Saucer magnolia
4 Carolina laurelcherry
4 Redflower gum
4 Sliver dollar
eucalyptus
4 Kaffir plum
4 Sweet cherry
4 Babylon weeping
willow
4 African tulip tree
4 Giant thevetia
4 Toog
4 Jelly palm
4 Canafistula
4 Northern catalpa
4 Atlas cedar
4 Green ash
4 Macadamia nut
4 Siala
4 Dawn redwood
4 Jerusalem thorn
4 Blackbead spp
4 Chilean mesquite
4 Purple wisteria
3 Pear spp
3 Fraser photinia
3 Vinegartree
3 Toyon
3 Citrus spp
3 Apple spp
3 Coast redwood
3 Silver maple
3 Incense cedar
3 Bay laurel
3 Northern white cedar
2 Narrow -leafed ash
1 Glossy privet
1 Black locust
1 Northern hackberry
1 Pomegranate
1 Apricot
1 Common plum
1 Oriental arborvitae
Pap: 31
267

r
U
m2
CO
x
k tupelo
Note:

Species that are not listed in the matrix are not known to be hosts to any of the pests analyzed.

Species Risk:
• Red indicates that tree species is at risk to at least one pest within county • Orange indicates that tree species has no risk to pests in county, but has a risk to at least one pest within 250 miles from the county
• Yellow indicates that tree species has no risk to pests within 250 miles of county, but has a risk to at least one pest that is 250 and 750 miles from the county
• Green indicates that tree species has no risk to pests within 750 miles of county, but has a risk to at least one pest that is greater than 750 miles from the county
Risk Weight:

Numerical scoring system based on sum of points assigned to pest risks for species. Each pest that could attack tree species is scored as 4 points if red, 3 points if orange, 2 points if yellow and 1 point if green.

Pest Color Codes:
• Red indicates pest is within Los Angeles county
• Red indicates pest is within 250 miles county
• Yellow indicates pest is within 750 miles of Los Angeles county • Green indicates pest is outside of these ranges

268

References
Abdollahi, K.K.; Ning, Z.H.; Appeaning, A., eds. 2000. Global climate change and the urban forest. Baton Rouge, LA:

GCRCCand Franklin Press. 77 p.

Baldocchi, D. 1988. A multi -layer model for estimating sulfur dioxide deposition to a deciduous oak forest canopy.

Atmospheric Environment. 22: 869-884.

Baldocchi, D.Q.; Hicks, B.B.; Camara, P. 1987. A canopy stomatal resistance model for gaseous deposition to vegetated surfaces. Atmospheric Environment. 21: 91-101.

Bidwell, R.G.S.; Fraser, D.E. 1972. Carbon monoxide uptake and metabolism by leaves. Canadian Journal of Botany. 50:
1435-1439.

British Columbia Ministry of Water, Land, and Air Protection. 2005. Residential wood burning emissions in British Columbia. British Columbia.

Broecker, W.S. 1970. Man's oxygen reserve. Science 168(3939): 1537-1538.

Bureau of Transportation Statistics. 2010. Estimated National Average Vehicle Emissions Rates per Vehicle by Vehicle Type using Gasoline and Diesel. Washington, DC: Burea of Transportation Statistics, U.S. Department of Transportation. Table 4-43.

California Air Resources Board. 2013. Methods to Find the Cost -Effectiveness of Funding Air Quality Projects. Table 3 Average Auto Emission Factors. CA: California Environmental Protection Agency, Air Resources Board.

California Invasive Species Advisory Committee. 2010. The California Invasive Species List. CA: Invasive Species Council of California. http://www.iscc.ca.gov/docs/California InvasiveSpeciesList.pdf> Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center. 2010. CO2 Emissions (metric tons per capita). Washington, DC: The World Bank.

Cardelino, C.A.; Chameides, W.L. 1990. Natural hydrocarbons, urbanization, and urban ozone. Journal of Geophysical Research. 95(D9): 13,971-13,979.

Cranshaw, W.; Tisserat, N. 2009. Walnut twig beetle and the thousand cankers disease of black walnut. Pest Alert. Ft.

Collins, CO: Colorado State University.

Seybold, S.; Haugen, D.; Graves, A. 2010. Thousand Cankers Disease. Pest Alert. NA -PR -02-10. Newtown Square, PA:

U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Area State and Private Forestry.

DeMars, C. J., Jr.; Roettgering, B. H. 1982. Western Pine Beetle. Forest Insect & Disease Leaflet 1. Washington, DC: U.S.

Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. 8 p.

Eastern Forest Environmental Threat Assessment Center. Dutch Elm Disease. http://threatsummary.forestthreats.org/ threats/threatSummaryViewer.cfm?threatID=43

269

Energy Information Administration. 1994. Energy Use and Carbon Emissions: Non -OECD Countries. Washington, DC:

Energy Information Administration, U.S. Department of Energy.

Energy Information Administration. 2013. CE2.1 Fuel consumption totals and averages, U.S. homes. Washington, DC:

Energy Information Administration, U.S. Department of Energy.

Energy Information Administration. 2014. CE5.2 Household wood consumption. Washington, DC: Energy Information Administration, U.S. Department of Energy.

Federal Highway Administration. 2013. Highway Statistics 2011.Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration, U.S.

Department of Transportation. Table VM-1.

Ferrell, G. T. 1986. Fir Engraver. Forest Insect & Disease Leaflet 13. Washington, DC: U. S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. 8 p.

Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team. 2014. 2012 National Insect & Disease Risk Maps/Data. Fort Collins, CO:

U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. http://www.fs.fed.us/foresthealth/technology/nidrm2012.shtml Georgia Forestry Commission. 2009. Biomass Energy Conversion for Electricity and Pellets Worksheet. Dry Branch, GA:

Georgia Forestry Commission.

Gibson, K.; Kegley, S.; Bentz, B. 2009. Mountain Pine Beetle. Forest Insect & Disease Leaflet 2. Washington, DC: U. S.

Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. 12 p.

Heirigs, P.L.; Delaney, S.S.; Dulla, R.G. 2004. Evaluation of MOBILE Models: MOBILE6.1 (PM), MOBILE6.2 (Toxics), and MOBILE6/CNG. Sacramento, CA: National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Transportation Research Board.

Hirabayashi, S. 2011. Urban Forest Effects -Dry Deposition (UFORE-D) Model Enhancements, http:// www.itreetools.org/eco/resources/UFORE-D enhancements.pdf Hirabayashi, S. 2012. i-Tree Eco Precipitation Interception Model Descriptions, http://www.itreetools.org/eco/ resources/iTree_Eco_Precipitation_Interception_Model_Descriptions_V1_2.pdf Hirabayashi, S.; Kroll, C.; Nowak, D. 2011. Component -based development and sensitivity analyses of an air pollutant dry deposition model. Environmental Modeling and Software. 26(6): 804-816.

Hirabayashi, S.; Kroll, C.; Nowak, D. 2012. i-Tree Eco Dry Deposition Model Descriptions V 1.0 Interagency Working Group on Social Cost of Carbon, United States Government. 2015. Technical Support Document:

Technical Update of the Social Cost of Carbon for Regulatory Impact Analysis Under Executive Order 12866. http:// www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/inforeg/scc-tsd-final-july-2015.pdf Layton, M. 2004. 2005 Electricity Environmental Performance Report: Electricity Generation and Air Emissions. CA:

California Energy Commission.

Leonardo Academy. 2011. Leonardo Academy's Guide to Calculating Emissions Including Emission Factors and Energy Prices. Madison, WI: Leonardo Academy Inc.

Lovett, G.M. 1994. Atmospheric deposition of nutrients and pollutants in North America: an ecological perspective.

Ecological Applications. 4: 629-650.

270

McPherson, E.G.; Maco, S.E.; Simpson, J.R.; Peper, P.J.; Xiao, Q.; VanDerZanden, A.M.; Bell, N. 2002. Western Washington and Oregon Community Tree Guide: Benefits, Costs, and Strategic Planting. International Society of Arboriculture, Pacific Northwest, Silverton, OR.

McPherson, E.G.; Simpson, J.R. 1999. Carbon dioxide reduction through urban forestry: guidelines for professional and volunteer tree planters. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-171. Albany, CA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station. 237 p.

McPherson, E.G.; Simpson, J.R.; Peper, P.J.; Crowell, A.M.N.; Xiao, Q. 2010. Northern California coast community tree guide: benefits, costs, and strategic planting. PSW-GTR-228. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR-228. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Albany, CA.

McPherson, E.G.; Simpson, J.R.; Peper, P.J.; Gardner, S.L.; Vargas, K.E.; Maco, S.E.; Xiao, Q. 2006a. Coastal Plain Community Tree Guide: Benefits, Costs, and Strategic Planting PSW-GTR-201. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Albany, CA.

McPherson, E.G.; Simpson, J.R.; Peper, P.J.; Gardner, S.L.; Vargas, K.E.; Xiao, Q. 2007. Northeast community tree guide:
benefits, costs, and strategic planting.

McPherson, E.G.; Simpson, J.R.; Peper, P.J.; Maco, S.E.; Gardner, S.L.; Cozad, S.K.; Xiao, Q. 2006b. Midwest Community Tree Guide: Benefits, Costs and Strategic Planting PSW-GTR-199. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Albany, CA.

McPherson, E.G.; Simpson, J.R.; Peper, P.J.; Maco, S.E.; Gardner, S.L.; Vargas, K.E.; Xiao, Q. 2006c. Piedmont Community Tree Guide: Benefits, Costs, and Strategic Planting PSW-GTR 200. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Albany, CA.

McPherson, E.G.; Simpson, J.R.; Peper, P.J.; Maco, S.E.; Xiao Q.; Mulrean, E. 2004. Desert Southwest Community Tree Guide: Benefits, Costs and Strategic Planting. Phoenix, AZ: Arizona Community Tree Council, Inc. 81 :81.

McPherson, E.G.; Simpson, J.R.; Peper, P.J.; Scott, K.I.; Xiao, Q. 2000. Tree Guidelines for Coastal Southern California Communities. Local Government Commission, Sacramento, CA.

McPherson, E.G.; Simpson, J.R.; Peper, P.J.; Xiao, Q. 1999. Tree Guidelines for San Joaquin Valley Communities. Local Government Commission, Sacramento, CA.

McPherson, E.G.; Simpson, J.R.; Peper, P.J.; Xiao, Q.; Maco, S.E.; Hoefer, P.J. 2003. Northern Mountain and Prairie Community Tree Guide: Benefits, Costs and Strategic Planting. Center for Urban Forest Research, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Albany, CA.

McPherson, E.G.; Simpson, J.R.; Peper, P.J.; Xiao, Q.; Pittenger, D.R.; Hodel, D.R. 2001. Tree Guidelines for Inland Empire Communities. Local Government Commission, Sacramento, CA.

Murray, F.J.; Marsh L.; Bradford, P.A. 1994. New York State Energy Plan, vol. I I : issue reports. Albany, NY: New York State Energy Office.

National Invasive Species Information Center. 2011. Beltsville, MD: U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Invasive Species Information Center. http://www.invasivespeciesinfo.gov/plants/main.shtml Nowak, D.J. 1994. Atmospheric carbon dioxide reduction by Chicago's urban forest. In: McPherson, E.G.; Nowak, D.J.; Rowntree, R.A., eds. Chicago's urban forest ecosystem: results of the Chicago Urban Forest Climate Project. Gen. Tech.

271

Rep. NE -186. Radnor, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station:
83-94.

Nowak, D.J. 1995. Trees pollute? A "TREE" explains it all. In: Proceedings of the 7th National Urban Forestry Conference. Washington, DC: American Forests: 28-30.

Nowak, D.J. 2000. The interactions between urban forests and global climate change. In: Abdollahi, K.K.; Ning, Z.H.; Appeaning, A., eds. Global Climate Change and the Urban Forest. Baton Rouge, LA: GCRCC and Franklin Press: 31-44.

Nowak, D.J., Hirabayashi, S., Bodine, A., Greenfield, E. 2014. Tree and forest effects on air quality and human health in the United States. Environmental Pollution. 193:119-129.

Nowak, D.J., Hirabayashi, S., Bodine, A., Hoehn, R. 2013. Modeled PM2.5 removal by trees in ten U.S. cities and associated health effects. Environmental Pollution. 178: 395-402.

Nowak, D.J.; Civerolo, K.L.; Rao, S.T.; Sistla, S.; Luley, C.J.; Crane, D.E. 2000. A modeling study of the impact of urban trees on ozone. Atmospheric Environment. 34: 1601-1613.

Nowak, D.J.; Crane, D.E. 2000. The Urban Forest Effects (UFORE) Model: quantifying urban forest structure and functions. In: Hansen, M.; Burk, T., eds. Integrated tools for natural resources inventories in the 21st century.

Proceedings of IUFRO conference. Gen. Tech. Rep. NC -212. St. Paul, MN: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Research Station: 714-720.

Nowak, D.J.; Crane, D.E.; Dwyer, J.F. 2002a. Compensatory value of urban trees in the United States. Journal of Arboriculture. 28(4): 194 - 199.

Nowak, D.J.; Crane, D.E.; Stevens, J.C.; Hoehn, R.E. 2005. The urban forest effects (U FORE) model: field data collection manual. V1b. Newtown Square, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Research Station, 34 p. http://www.fs.fed.us/ne/syracuse/Tools/downloads/UFORE_Manual.pdf Nowak, D.J.; Crane, D.E.; Stevens, J.C.; Ibarra, M. 2002b. Brooklyn's urban forest. Gen. Tech. Rep. NE -290. Newtown Square, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Research Station. 107 p.

Nowak, D.J.; Dwyer, J.F. 2000. Understanding the benefits and costs of urban forest ecosystems. In: Kuser, John, ed.

Handbook of urban and community forestry in the northeast. New York, NY: Kluwer Academics/Plenum: 11-22.

Nowak, D.J.; Hoehn, R.; Crane, D. 2007. Oxygen production by urban trees in the United States. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry. 33(3):220-226.

Nowak, D.J.; Hoehn, R.E.; Crane, D.E.; Stevens, J.C.; Walton, J.T; Bond, J. 2008. A ground -based method of assessing urban forest structure and ecosystem services. Arboriculture and Urban Forestry. 34(6): 347-358.

Nowak, D.J.; Stevens, J.C.; Sisinni, S.M.; Luley, C.J. 2002c. Effects of urban tree management and species selection on atmospheric carbon dioxide. Journal of Arboriculture. 28(3): 113-122.

Peper, P.J.; McPherson, E.G.; Simpson, J.R.; Albers, S.N.; Xiao, Q. 2010. Central Florida community tree guide: benefits, costs, and strategic planting. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR-230. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Albany, CA.

Peper, P.J.; McPherson, E.G.; Simpson, J.R.; Vargas, K.E.; Xiao Q. 2009. Lower Midwest community tree guide: benefits, costs, and strategic planting. PSW-GTR-219. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR-219. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest

272

Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Albany, CA.

Smith, S. L.; Borys, R. R.; Shea, P. J. 2009. Jeffrey Pine Beetle. Forest Insect & Disease Leaflet 11. Washington, DC: U. S.

Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. 8 p.

Society of American Foresters. 2011. Gold Spotted Oak Borer Hitches Ride in Firewood, Kills California Oaks. Forestry Source 16(10): 20.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2010. Light -Duty Vehicle Greenhouse Gas Emission Standards and Corporate Average Fuel Economy Standards. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. EPA -420 -R -10-012a U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2015. The social cost of carbon. http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/ EPAactivities/economics/scc.html
University of California. 2014. Polphagous Shot Hole Borer. Sacramento, CA: University of California, Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources.
van Essen, H.; Schroten, A.; Otten, M.; Sutter, D.; Schreyer, C.; Zandonella, R.; Maibach, M.; Doll, C. 2011. External Costs of Transport in Europe. Netherlands: CE Delft. 161 p.

Vargas, K.E.; McPherson, E.G.; Simpson, J.R.; Peper, P.J.; Gardner, S.L.; Xiao, Q. 2007a. Interior West Tree Guide.

Vargas, K.E.; McPherson, E.G.; Simpson, J.R.; Peper, P.J.; Gardner, S.L.; Xiao, Q. 2007b. Temperate Interior West Community Tree Guide: Benefits, Costs, and Strategic Planting.

Vargas, K.E.; McPherson, E.G.; Simpson, J.R.; Peper, P.J.; Gardner, S.L.; Xiao, Q. 2008. Tropical community tree guide:
benefits, costs, and strategic planting. PSW-GTR-216. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR-216. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Albany, CA.

Worrall, J.J. 2007. Chestnut Blight. Forest and Shade Tree Pathology. http://www.forestpathology.org/dis_chestnut.html
Zinke, P.J. 1967. Forest interception studies in the United States. In: Sopper, W.E.; Lull, H.W., eds. Forest Hydrology.

Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press: 137-161.

273

Benefits Summary of Trees by Species
Location: Bellflower, Los Angeles, California, United States of America Project: City of Bellflower, Series: March 2026, Year: 2026 Generated: 3/18/2026
Species
Trees
Number
Carbon Storage
(ton) ($)
Gross Carbon Sequestration
(ton/yr) ($/yr)
Avoided Runoff
(gal/yr) ($/yr)
Pollution Removal
(ton/yr) ($/yr)
Replacement Value
($)
Trident maple
q '--1 Ol N N 61 N Cr) M l0 N N M I, en 0 N ri r-1 I� N e-1 ei al Op N l0 I� N l0 R C
m .-1

8.72 3,771.71

0.50 216.95
2,017.50

18.03 0.01
183.94
60,748.05
Small philippine acacia

0.07 29.49

0.01 2.59

52.11 0.47

0.00 4.75
2,555.86
Japanese maple

0.85 368.31

0.05 22.94
218.96

1.96 0.00

19.96 14,072.81
Pearl wattle

0.03 11.81

0.00 2.15

22.12 0.20

0.00 2.02
2,381.20
Silver maple

2.59 1,122.49

0.10 45.28
455.59

4.07 0.00

41.54 18,255.55
0uteniqua yellowwood
223.38
96,663.57

9.56 4,135.56
36,448.35
325.70

0.17 3,323.00
2,391,121.73
Peppermint tree

3.69 1,595.15

0.00 1.28
248.04

2.22 0.00

22.61 11,088.70
Tree of heaven

8.37 3,620.96

0.02 10.32
453.03

4.05 0.00

41.30 22,702.06
Persian silk tree

0.98 423.21

0.03 14.73
234.47

2.10 0.00

21.38 11,584.55
Cherimoya

0.66 284.66

0.08 33.14
282.89

2.53 0.00

25.79 11,629.45
Madrone spp

0.49 213.23

0.05 19.92

83.64 0.75

0.00 7.63
4,658.51
Coral reef araucaria

0.95 412.36

0.04 18.19
203.44

1.82 0.00

18.55 11,352.88
King palm

4.05 1,754.22

0.28 122.83
653.61

5.84 0.00

59.59 81,265.26
Strawberry tree

0.43 187.65

0.05 22.02

87.75 0.78

0.00 8.00
9,650.33
Hong Kong Orchid Tree

7.60 3,287.90

0.47 202.50
757.24

6.77 0.00

69.04 76,305.47
Mountain ebony

33.72 14,589.54

1.15 497.43
2,676.12

23.91 0.01
243.98
293,289.97
European white birch

0.25 108.69

0.04 16.13
119.46

1.07 0.00

10.89 3,789.36
Ponytail palm
Toog
Kurrajong

0.05 0.02

66.24 23.21

8.98 28,661.78

0.01 0.01

4.56 3.24

3.42 1,972.71

7.66 5.88
15,151.30

0.07 0.05
135.39

0.00 0.00

0.07 0.70

0.54 1,381.35
1,515.66
1,190.60
785,059.68
Feather Palm spp

0.05 19.82

0.00 1.06

15.32 0.14

0.00 1.40
2,382.93
Jelly palm

0.03 13.05

0.00 0.49

11.01 0.10

0.00 1.00
775.37
Bottlebrush spp

0.02 7.77

0.01 2.56

1.37 0.01

0.00 0.13
417.02
Cape chesnut
Crimson bottlebrush

5.87 27.71
2,538.68
11,992.87

0.33 141.08
665.55
497.13
4,349.87

4.44 38.87

0.00 0.02

45.32 396.58
38,101.77

1.54 173,764.39

274

Benefits Summary of Trees by Species
location: Bellflower, Los Angeles, California, United States of America Project: City of Bellflower, Series: March 2026, Year: 2026 Generated: 3/18/2026
Species
Incense cedar
White sapote
Australian pine
Canafistula
Tassel flower
Gold medallion tree
Northern catalpa
Cassia spp
Weeping bottlebrush
Atlas cedar
Eastern redbud
Deodar cedar
Northern hackberry
Silk floss tree
Mediterranean fan pal
Desertwillow
Chinese fringe tree
Chitalpa
Camphor tree
Lemon
Citrus spp
Lemonscented gum
Smoke tree
Spotted gum
Hawthorn spp
Trees
Number
Carbon Storage
(ton) ($)
Gross Carbon Sequestration
(ton/yr) ($/yr)
Avoided Runoff
(gal/yr) ($/yr)
Pollution Removal
(ton/yr) ($/yr)
Replacement Value
($)
2 1.47
634.50

0.04 15.26
320.47

2.86 0.00

29.22 17,084.26
1 0.43
185.07

0.05 22.18

45.33 0.41

0.00 4.13
2,555.86
3 1.19
514.04

0.12 51.42

90.44 0.81

0.00 8.25
10,200.20
1 0.08

32.68 0.02

6.79 12.67

0.11 0.00

1.15 1,515.66
1 0.36
157.92

0.04 17.60

52.18 0.47

0.00 4.76
2,897.17
5 0.45
193.50

0.05 21.96

75.55 0.68

0.00 6.89
6,778.79
1 0.58
248.90

0.03 13.85
152.01

1.36 0.00

13.86 5,358.28
1 0.13

54.88 0.02

6.52 20.05

0.18 0.00

1.83 1,970.75
6 8.10
3,505.04

0.01 3.63
1,325.23

11.84 0.01
120.82
40,787.38
1 0.40
173.10

0.02 9.02

83.68 0.75

0.00 7.63
5,106.12
1 0.03

13.89 0.01

2.61 10.41

0.09 0.00

0.95 1,336.88
2 1.81
781.43

0.08 35.95
234.10

2.09 0.00

21.34 20,837.63
15 0.42
180.67

0.04 18.45
679.32

6.07 0.00

61.93 25,989.71
3 0.64
276.40

0.06 26.58
129.26

1.16 0.00

11.79 6,578.62
m
8 0.42
180.17

0.09 37.02

51.82 0.46

0.00 4.72
3,266.44
7 0.06

24.94 0.02

9.04 16.49

0.15 0.00

1.50 1,760.76
30 4.83
2,091.66

0.49 212.65
1,364.03

12.19 0.01
124.36
59,528.76
12 5.29
2,290.38

0.38 162.36
645.59

5.77 0.00

58.86 35,952.51
14 10.40
4,502.36

0.70 300.76
1,214.92

10.86 0.01
110.76
63,321.91
10 2.33
1,009.41

0.19 84.00
250.59

2.24 0.00

22.85 21,430.30
8 2.63
1,139.99

0.20 84.72
284.32

2.54 0.00

25.92 20,014.59
40 131.51
56,909.75

5.83 2,522.48
14,145.69
126.41

0.06 1,289.67
456,844.27
4 0.41
178.31

0.06 27.53

46.67 0.42

0.00 4.25
6,062.65
7 27.14
11,744.19

0.71 306.07
2,703.44

24.16 0.01
246.47
90,947.58
1 0.00

1.49 0.00

0.80 2.13

0.02 0.00

0.19 185.34
i Tree.

275

Benefits Summary of Trees by Species
location: Bellflower, los Angeles, California, United States of America Project: City of Bellflower, Series: March 2026, Year. 2026 Generated' 3/18/2026
Species
Trees
Number
Carbon Storage
(ton) ($)
Gross Carbon Sequestration
(ton/yr) ($/yr)
Avoided Runoff
(gal/yr) ($/yr)
Pollution Removal
(ton/yr) ($/yr)
Replacement Value
($)
Carrotwood
53 49.70
21,507.39

0.97 421.21
3,936.42

35.18 0.02
358.88
268,828.29
Leyland cypress
1 0.11

46.91 0.02

9.16 17.64

0.16 0.00

1.61 1,257.53
Italian cypress
24 10.87
4,703.68

0.39 169.40
1,570.26

14.03 0.01
143.16
100,289.00
Sago palm
1 0.10

43.64 0.01

4.49 17.92

0.16 0.00

1.63 2,446.22
Common persimmon
1 0.41
177.34

0.02 8.54
122.20

1.09 0.00

11.14 a
4,587.49
Florida hopbush
41 10.93
4,730.86

1.52 657.91
2,299.46

20.55 0.01
209.64
83,872.48
Triangle palm
1 0.16

69.25 0.00

2.11 23.31

0.21 0.00

2.13 1,191.47
Naked coral tree
7 4.34
1,876.06

0.00 1.67
939.37

8.39 0.00

85.64 69,071.78
Bronze loquat
31 14.22
6,154.24

0.83 359.43
1,763.15

15.76 0.01
160.75
103,405.49
Loquat tree
18 4.26
1,841.38

0.29 127.22
551.49

4.93 0.00

50.28 41,496.07
Sugargum
1 2.37
1,024.91

0.13 55.11
299.69

2.68 0.00

27.32 7,544.17
Mexican shrubby spurge
2 0.45
193.20

0.05 19.88

71.04 0.63

0.00 6.48
5,453.03
Broad-leaved red ironbark
1 0.07

32.39 0.01

6.19 5.06

0.05 0.00

0.46 1,310.72
Redflower gum
2 3.10
1,339.70

0.00 1.81
463.18

4.14 0.00

42.23 13,595.79
Blue gum eucalyptus
1 2.53
1,095.13

0.12 51.23
416.93

3.73 0.00

38.01 9,459.03
Gray ironbark
1 0.12

50.73 0.02

10.13 28.22

0.25 0.00

2.57 1,460.10
Moort
1 2.96
1,279.14

0.00 0.71
414.13

3.70 0.00

37.76 9,459.03
Sliver dollar eucalyptus
2 4.91
2,124.61

0.26 114.06
651.57

5.82 0.00

59.40 15,088.35
Beakpod euclayptus
26 70.24
30,394.40

2.46 1,062.48
9,821.40

87.76 0.04
895.42
301,847.29
Desert gum eucalyptus
2 6.57
2,843.22

0.08 32.81
768.62

6.87 0.00

70.07 26,306.13
Mugga ironbark
9 7.52
3,254.17

0.58 251.95
814.53

7.28 0.00

74.26 30,632.62
Indiantree spurge
2 0.59
255.69

0.06 23.82

94.80 0.85

0.00 8.64
5,794.34
Benjamin fig
35 21.86
9,459.64

1.33 574.86
2,578.45

23.04 0.01
235.08
167,469.52
Common fig
5 0.54
232.73

0.08 34.52
134.38

1.20 0.00

12.25 9,935.00
Rubber plant
1 0.83
360.34

0.03 11.00
107.21

0.96 0.00

9.77 5,091.33
111
i Tree.

276

Benefits Summary of Trees by Species
location: Bellflower, Los Angeles, California, United States of America Project: City of Bellflower, Series: March 2026, Year- 2026 Generated: 3/18/2026
Species
Banana -It
Green inc
White fig
Flannelbt
Narrow -If
Green as
Shamel a:

Velvet asl
Wilga; au
Ginkgo
Honeyloc
Silk oak
Kaffir plus
Black lap
heptapler
Queensla
Toyon
Sweetsha
Bottle pal
Bluejacai
Chinese jr
Black wal
Chinese fl
Goldenrai
Common
Trees
Number
Carbon Storage
(ton) ($)
Gross Carbon Sequestration
(ton/yr) ($/yr)
Avoided Runoff
(gal/yr) ($/yr)
Pollution Removal
(ton/yr) ($/yr)
Replacement Value
($)
:af fig
8 1.67
723.49

0.14 60.94
492.39

4.40 0.00

44.89 21,714.59
lian laurel fig
19 5.66
2,447.90

0.38 165.98
1,206.75

10.78 0.01
110.02
61,661.22
1 1.76
760.42

0.06 25.13
172.20

1.54 0.00

15.70 13,672.93
Ish spp
1 0.24
103.46

0.02 8.47

62.76 0.56

0.00 5.72
2,897.17
afed ash
1 0.91
392.97

0.04 15.78
210.08

1.88 0.00

19.15 8,817.45
t
1 0.05

23.53 0.01

2.62 31.20

0.28 0.00

2.84 2,329.25
sh
156
165.77
71,731.10

3.61 1,562.57
15,576.14
139.19

0.07 1,420.08
1,336,996.52
i
22 26.71
11,557.43

0.64 276.39
3,339.96

29.85 0.02
304.50
228,336.31
stralian willow
690
936.72
405,346.77

11.41 4,937.43
62,009.57
554.12

0.28 5,653.43
4,233,271.47
52 4.81
2,083.24

0.27 114.80
2,956.23

26.42 0.01
269.52
144,911.80
ust
57 12.99
5,622.57

1.34 580.16
2,872.71

25.67 0.01
261.91
163,276.93
1 1.71
741.60

0.08 36.48
143.19

1.28 0.00

13.05 11,088.70
m
2 10.14
4,389.03

0.08 34.91
389.25

3.48 0.00

35.49 44,438.71
rcho
28 14.14
6,120.83

1.06 458.75
1,230.98

11.00 0.01
112.23
89,477.25
srum spp
1 1.88
813.70

0.09 38.54
128.04

1.14 0.00

11.67 7,431.76
nd umbrella tree
2 2.34
1,012.08

0.17 74.17
205.43

1.84 0.00

18.73 10,475.21
50 19.36
8,379.21

1.68 727.78
2,470.97

22.08 0.01
225.28
134,066.50
de
9 4.64
2,006.65

0.30 129.51
725.49

6.48 0.00

66.14 38,166.78
m
3 0.12

53.05 0.01

3.40 15.37

0.14 0.00

1.40 3,574.40
•anda
89 51.80
22,417.41

2.82 1,222.44
9,558.57

85.42 0.04
871.46
528,111.79
sniper
nut
lame tree
9 23
89 9.61

17.67 42.69
4,158.43
7,646.42
18,474.64

0.48 1.18

1.30 209.07
512.21
563.24
1,539.23
3,628.37
6,748.31

13.75 32.42

60.30 0.01

0.02 0.03
140.33
330.80
615.24
74,584.20
143,775.10
322,286.58
in tree
43 23.13
10,007.04

1.08 467.08
4,851.96

43.36 0.02
442.35
167,307.53
crapemyrtle
1,115
228.58
98,911.40

18.37 7,949.88
42,224.00
377.31

0.19 3,849.57
2,707,362.49
i Tree.

277

Benefits Summary of Trees by Species
location: Bellflower, Los Angeles, California, United States of America Project: City of Bellflower, Series: March 2026, Year. 2026 Generated: 3/18/2026
Species
Trees
Number
Carbon Storage
(ton) ($)
Gross Carbon Sequestration
(ton/yr) ($/yr)
Avoided Runoff
(gal/yr) ($/yr)
Pollution Removal
(ton/yr) ($/yr)
Replacement Value
($)
Bay laurel
1 0.92
400.26

0.05 19.99

87.67 0.78

0.00 7.99
3,677.32
Leadtree spp
5 1.58
683.40

0.09 37.31
318.80

2.85 0.00

29.07 17,557.67
Guaje
1 0.00

0.53 0.00

0.41 0.55

0.00 0.00

0.05 58.57
Glossy privet
289
104.05
45,026.18

6.28 2,719.29
27,714.89
247.66

0.13 2,526.77
1,022,973.05
Sweetgum
62 14.03
6,071.51

1.16 504.01
5,885.67

52.59 0.03
536.60
273,939.54
Vinegartree
107

95.00 41,108.42

5.30 2,294.62
10,932.76

97.70 0.05
996.74
504,610.97
Apple spp
7 2.71
1,173.32

0.11 45.72
320.94

2.87 0.00

29.26 24,587.24
Common apple
5 1.48
642.19

0.08 35.49
220.35

1.97 0.00

20.09 15,005.95
Southern magnolia
236
142.32
61,586.64

7.29 3,154.14
31,845.80
284.57

0.15 2,903.39
1,737,202.73
Mango
4 0.31
133.70

0.04 16.98

53.86 0.48

0.00 4.91
6,647.76
Macadamia nut
1 0.39
170.58

0.02 10.00

38.32 0.34

0.00 3.49
2,897.17
Lily Magnolia
1 0.04

16.95 0.01

3.31 21.06

0.19 0.00

1.92 1,417.08
Siala
1 0.45
192.76

0.02 10.00

88.50 0.79

0.00 8.07
5,091.33
Saucer magnolia
3 0.52
226.93

0.05 21.89
140.53

1.26 0.00

12.81 8,529.10
Chinaberry
7 9.41
4,073.68

0.30 130.74
703.42

6.29 0.00

64.13 62,302.82
New zealand chrstmas tree
48 82.56
35,725.86

4.23 1,831.21
8,940.50

79.89 0.04
815.11
267,463.09
Dawn redwood
1 0.38
164.75

0.02 9.35
146.96

1.31 0.00

13.40 10,583.93
Pink melaleuca
6 7.98
3,454.29

0.10 41.81
919.60

8.22 0.00

83.84 38,479.45
Punk tree
94 95.44
41,301.41

4.57 1,979.71
14,517.93
129.73

0.07 1,323.60
580,886.33
White mulberry
10 7.90
3,419.31

0.42 181.37
926.75

8.28 0.00

84.49 52,213.53
Black mulberry
1 2.01
871.67

0.00 0.94
145.58

1.30 0.00

13.27 11,088.70
Horseradishtree
1 0.09

37.55 0.01

4.75 42.91

0.38 0.00

3.91 2,555.86
Red mulberry
1 0.06

27.72 0.01

4.49 18.94

0.17 0.00

1.73 1,515.66
Banana spp
1 0.20

88.20 0.02

6.58 32.27

0.29 0.00

2.94 1,022.19
Murraya koenigii
1 0.24
105.99

0.03 12.13

26.25 0.23

0.00 2.39
1,970.75
i Tree.

278

Benefits Summary of Trees by Species
location: Bellflower, Los Angeles, California, United States of America Project: City of Bellflower, Series: March 2026, Year 2026 Generated: 3/18/2026
Species
Oleander
Black tupelo
Olive
Jerusalem thorn
Avocado
Tropical Bamboo spp
Canary island date pal
Date palm
Fraser photinia
Pygmy date palm
Photinia
Blackbead spp
Canary island pine
Chinese pistache
Monkeypod
Afghan pine
Aleppo pine
Pittosporum willow
Italian stone pine
Blue spruce
Queensland pittosporl
Japanese black pine
Japanese pittosporum
Sycamore spp
American sycamore
Trees
Number
Carbon Storage
(ton) ($)
Gross Carbon Sequestration
(ton/yr) ($/yr)
Avoided Runoff
(gal/yr) ($/yr)
Pollution Removal
(ton/yr) ($/yr)
Replacement Value
($)
1 0.21

91.17 0.02

9.87 37.99

0.34 0.00

3.46 2,555.86
1 0.03

14.05 0.01

2.68 11.47

0.10 0.00

1.05 1,363.90
22 11.48
4,966.61

0.27 116.01
1,267.85

11.33 0.01
115.59
81,684.72
1 0.10

43.40 0.02

6.78 19.49

0.17 0.00

1.78 1,970.75
19 11.50
4,976.41

0.33 143.01
1,439.16

12.86 0.01
131.21
73,317.07
3 5.25
2,272.61

0.00 2.15
159.94

1.43 0.00

14.58 1,550.34
m
14 2.03
880.09

0.04 18.96
671.39

6.00 0.00

61.21 61,604.16
22 3.41
1,475.25

0.08 33.57
742.28

6.63 0.00

67.67 19,199.81
112

47.03 20,353.12

2.98 1,288.13
6,572.36

58.73 0.03
599.20
353,413.46
42 0.65
282.24

0.06 24.93
183.08

1.64 0.00

16.69 44,518.64
1 0.35
152.42

0.03 12.95

61.84 0.55

0.00 5.64
2,897.17
1 0.21

89.44 0.02

8.53 55.92

0.50 0.00

5.10 2,555.86
70 69.92
30,258.18

1.74 753.66
9,500.81

84.90 0.04
866.19
718,060.45
211

65.61 28,391.24

4.71 2,037.10
8,894.00

79.48 0.04
810.87
593,976.82
3 0.65
283.26

0.07 29.15

97.79 0.87

0.00 8.92
6,731.46
2 1.23
531.93

0.07 28.25
200.84

1.79 0.00

18.31 15,561.38
19 17.51
7,579.05

0.59 254.41
3,100.49

27.71 0.01
282.67
229,786.56
1 0.50
214.23

0.02 10.05

86.66 0.77

0.00 7.90
4,116.15
17 12.21
5,283.21

0.39 168.29
1,647.14

14.72 0.01
150.17
146,665.85
1 0.01

4.93 0.00

0.89 1.52

0.01 0.00

0.14 487.83
1m
7 4.95
2,143.72

0.17 72.62
558.52

4.99 0.00

50.92 26,667.63
15 2.29
991.39

0.12 51.86
783.76

7.00 0.00

71.46 49,776.07
2 0.83
361.31

0.04 17.92
150.51

1.34 0.00

13.72 7,387.14
327
158.09
68,411.38

7.77 3,364.34
53,971.26
482.29

0.25 4,920.57
2,399,977.71
5 1.88
815.41

0.13 55.91
799.35

7.14 0.00

72.88 32,239.50
i Tree.

279

Benefits Summary of Trees by Species
location: Bellflower, Los Angeles, California, United States of America Project: City of Bellflower, Series: March 2026, Year 2026 Generated: 3/18/2026
Species
Trees
Number
Carbon Storage
(ton) ($)
Gross Carbon Sequestration
(ton/yr) ($/yr)
Avoided Runoff
(gal/yr) ($/yr)
Pollution Removal
(ton/yr) ($/yr)
Replacement Value
($)
California sycamore
46 33.69
14,578.88

0.94 404.72
10,329.46

92.30 0.05
941.74
449,575.02
Frangipani
5 0.59
257.42

0.04 17.31
150.89

1.35 0.00

13.76 10,520.11
Fremont cottonwood
1 0.68
295.12

0.05 20.83
178.12

1.59 0.00

16.24 2,631.52
Apricot
2 0.23

97.74 0.03

13.82 28.85

0.26 0.00

2.63 3,161.35
Sweet cherry
2 0.35
152.10

0.04 15.44

70.27 0.63

0.00 6.41
4,412.83
Carolina laurelcherry
3 3.40
1,470.10

0.04 15.88
359.04

3.21 0.00

32.73 18,134.52
Cherry plum
20 2.32
1,003.02

0.27 116.71
537.01

4.80 0.00

48.96 35,454.89
Chilean mesquite
1 0.56
241.32

0.03 11.13

46.16 0.41

0.00 4.21
4,587.49
Common plum
2 0.69
299.29

0.06 25.83
117.70

1.05 0.00

10.73 5,826.85
Hollyleaf cherry
110

55.18 23,878.43

3.99 1,727.97
6,406.81

57.25 0.03
584.11
328,916.16
Peach
9 1.08
468.16

0.19 80.60
203.36

1.82 0.00

18.54 15,721.35
Common guava
14 1.79
773.39

0.20 84.53
279.92

2.50 0.00

25.52 20,613.09
Pomegranate
4 0.57
248.14

0.07 28.93

86.92 0.78

0.00 7.92
7,232.87
Pear spp
219

99.96 43,255.46

4.24 1,836.44
17,231.44
153.98

0.08 1,570.99
873,146.31
Birchleaf pear
1 0.47
202.06

0.02 9.72

94.46 0.84

0.00 8.61
4,116.15
Callery pear
501
244.19
105,668.54

15.23 6,590.56
43,778.13
391.20

0.20 3,991.26
2,033,898.32
Coastal live oak
11 5.99
2,589.92

0.26 111.61
1,368.95

12.23 0.01
124.81
60,762.09
Holly oak
183
150.10
64,950.75

7.30 3,158.73
28,294.08
252.84

0.13 2,579.58
1,273,906.08
Live oak
2 2.46
1,064.90

0.12 53.08
246.95

2.21 0.00

22.51 20,214.50
Majesty palm
7 0.85
368.65

0.05 21.56
117.67

1.05 0.00

10.73 8,340.26
Rhaphiolepis spp
64 17.57
7,604.13

1.40 606.63
3,447.97

30.81 0.02
314.35
190,879.91
Lemonade berry
26 4.43
1,917.52

0.38 162.48
877.18

7.84 0.00

79.97 70,921.86
Indian hawthorn
5 1.70
733.81

0.15 65.22
216.86

1.94 0.00

19.77 11,497.72
African sumac
203

74.01 32,025.49

4.42 1,911.61
6,792.19

60.70 0.03
619.25
665,782.53
Black locust
38 23.18
10,031.71

1.61 698.04
3,176.02

28.38 0.01
289.56
136,716.10
i Tree.

280

Benefits Summary of Trees by Species
location: Bellflower, Los Angeles, California, United States of America Project: City of Bellflower, Series: March 2026, Year. 2026 Generated: 3/18/2026
Species
Robinia spp
Babylon weeping will+
California peppertree
Aroeira-pimenteira
Coast redwood
African tulip tree
Pagoda tree
Firewheel tree
Scrub cherry
Jambolan plum
Queen palm
Red Cedar spp
Northern white cedar
Oriental arborvitae
Giant thevetia
Pride of bolivia
Windmill palm
Water gum
Chinese tallowtree
Chinese elm
Siberian elm
Elm spp
Chaste tree
California palm
Mexican fan palm
Trees
Number
Carbon Storage
(ton) ($)
Gross Carbon Sequestration
(ton/yr) ($/yr)
Avoided Runoff
(gal/yr) ($/yr)
Pollution Removal
(ton/yr) ($/yr)
Replacement Value
($)
46 14.67
6,348.63

1.08 467.90
3,131.00

27.98 0.01
285.45
121,040.37
w
2 0.41
179.39

0.03 14.46
115.96

1.04 0.00

10.57 4,686.81
10 15.18
6,567.87

0.14 59.95
908.19

8.12 0.00

82.80 87,083.19
79 82.34
35,629.65

0.80 344.32
6,997.28

62.53 0.03
637.94
564,332.26
3 2.04
884.81

0.09 38.30
356.71

3.19 0.00

32.52 31,013.71
2 0.15

63.39 0.01

5.73 74.75

0.67 0.00

6.81 4,094.34
2 1.08
467.84

0.08 34.20

94.13 0.84

0.00 8.58
7,387.14
29 5.21
2,254.85

0.33 144.14
906.30

8.10 0.00

82.63 di
62,668.02
2 0.31
135.13

0.04 15.36

59.02 0.53

0.00 5.38
3,941.50
2 0.68
294.46

0.07 29.57
126.14

1.13 0.00

11.50 #
6,233.17
417

25.26 10,930.98

0.72 309.87
9,066.87

81.02 0.04
826.63
303,358.23
1 0.04

18.40 0.01

2.20 9.07

0.08 0.00

0.83 1,488.34
1 0.00

1.13 0.00

0.56 0.56

0.00 0.00

0.05 48.94
2 1.03
445.81

0.02 9.01
185.49

1.66 0.00

16.91 9,146.84
2 0.61
264.54

0.06 23.96

89.06 0.80

0.00 8.12
4,802.91
4 0.09

40.26 0.02

8.19 19.12

0.17 0.00

1.74 4,049.70
17 1.24
538.23

0.16 67.60
176.34

1.58 0.00

16.08 12,507.76
1 0.43
184.21

0.02 10.56

61.35 0.55

0.00 5.59
1 2,897.17
32 15.15
6,556.77

1.17 505.84
1,949.01

17.42 0.01
177.69
120,975.89
234
282.37
122,188.94

16.24 7,027.16
25,548.12
228.30

0.12 2,329.23
1,891,669.55
6 5.37
2,324.75

0.33 141.25
882.02

7.88 0.00

80.41 25,976.68
1 0.03

14.00 0.01

2.73 4.31

0.04 0.00

0.39 1,292.99
1 0.03

15.08 0.01

3.51 5.36

0.05 0.00

0.49 1,336.88
5 0.70
303.96

0.03 12.55
210.87

1.88 0.00

19.23 3,384.84
35 5.60
2,423.42

0.23 97.73
2,292.73

20.49 0.01
209.03
14,416.06
i Tree.

281

Benefits Summary of Trees by Species
location: Bellflower, Los Angeles, California, United States of America Project: City of Bellflower, Series: March 2026, Year: 2026 Generated: 3/18/2026
Species
Trees
Number
Carbon Storage
(ton) ($)
Gross Carbon Sequestration
(ton/yr) ($/yr)
Avoided Runoff
(gal/yr) ($/yr)
Pollution Removal
(ton/yr) ($/yr)
Replacement Value
($)
Purple wisteria
1 0.03

14.23 0.01

3.32 2.52

0.02 0.00

0.23 1,190.60
Foxtail palm
1 0.05

19.73 0.00

1.12 5.41

0.05 0.00

0.49 1,191.47
Xylosma spp
101

33.95 14,692.74

3.00 1,296.71
5,395.52

48.21 0.02
491.91
255,589.80
Moundlily yucca
1 0.46
198.06

0.02 10.31

49.62 0.44

0.00 4.52
179.44
Japanese zelkova
177

49.50 21,419.18

2.67 1,155.12
20,067.60
179.32

0.09 1,829.57
938,137.42
Common jujube
5 2.68
1,158.55

0.25 107.45
235.40

2.10 0.00

21.46 18,435.34
Total
8,234
4,663.62
2,018,075.71
202.65
87,691.08
678,278.24
6,061.09

3.11 61,838.78
37,018,767.73
i Tree.

Carbon storage and gross carbon sequestration value is calculated based on the price of $432.73 per ton.

Due to limits of available models, i-Tree Eco will limit carbon storage to a maximum of 7,500 kg (16,534.7 Ibs) and not estimate additional storage for any tree beyond a diameter of 254 cm (100 in). Whichever limit results in lower carbon storage is used.

Avoided runoff value is calculated by the price $0.009/gal. The user -designated weather station reported 19.4 inches of total annual precipitation. Eco will always use the hourly measurements that have the greatest total rainfall or user -submitted rainfall if provided.

Pollution removal value is calculated based on the prices of $1,857.81 per ton (CO), $14,519.44 per ton (O3), $2,836.93 per ton (NO2), $920.85 per ton (SO2), $757,436.36 per ton (PM2.5), $8,733.06 per ton (PM10*).

Replacement value is the estimated local cost of having to replace a tree with a similar tree.

A value of zero may indicate that ancillary data (pollution, weather, energy, etc.) is not available for this location or that the reported amounts are too small to be shown.

282

VssCA& BENEFITS OF TREES
Strategic planting
can reduce energy
coi umption by
I5-35%
Planting trees
can increase
the value of
residential property
by approx.
20%
—
In commercial areas. trees
can boost business and
tourism by providing
aesthetic appeal.

I
Shade decreases air conditioning
use and reduces
the amount of carbon dioxide
emitted by power plants.

Trees alter the environment by:
.:if .Moderating the climate
al .Improving ale quality
.Reducing noise pollution
bili
.Saving energy
.Conserving water
.Harboring wildlife
•
ti
N
Tree canopies help protect
us from exposure to the
sun's UV rays.

On average. each tree
reduces runoff by
845 1
gallons annually.

Shade provided by
trees to other
landscape plants can
reduce their ',ti'ater
requirements.

Beautification of our surroundings enhances
our v, 'ell being and alleviates stress.

Trees promote
pride within the
community.

A healthy urban forest can reduce the
amount of runoff and pollution in
receiving Ivaters.
284

Mature Tree Care
Learn procedures specific to a routine maintenance program for mature tree care, including tree inspection, mulching, fertilization, pruning, and tree removal.

Trees serve many purposes in your local community;
therefore, homeowners should think of tree care as an
investment. A healthy tree increases in value with age
and pays big dividends by increasing property values,
beautifying surroundings, purifying air, and saving energy by providing cooling shade from summer's heat and protection from winter's wind.

Trees in the city or near houses need regular maintenance to promote health and structural integrity. An effective maintenance program, including regular inspections
and necessary follow-up care —mulching, fertilizing, and additional soil management —can identify problems and
correct them before they become damaging or fatal.

Tree Inspection
Regular tree inspections can detect changes in a tree's health before a disease, insect, or environmental problem becomes too serious. Mature trees should be inspected
at least once a year to assess four characteristics of tree vitality: new leaf or bud formation, leaf size, twig growth, and absence of crown dieback (gradual death of the upper part of the tree).

Growth reduction is a fairly reliable cue that the tree's health has recently changed. An experienced arborist can look at twig growth from past years to determine whether there is a reduction in the trees typical growth pattern.

In addition to tree health, tree stability is a major concern.

There are some tree characteristics you can look for that can indicate structural weakness. These include cavity
opening, extensive twig dieback, and the presence of fungal conks (mushrooms or brackets on the trunk).

Any abnormalities found during these inspections should be noted and monitored closely. Report your findings to your local tree care professional for advice on treatment options.

Pruning
• Pruning is often desirable or necessary to remove dead, diseased, or insect -infested branches and to improve tree structure, enhance vitality, or reduce risk.
• The removal of live branches creates a lasting wound; therefore, no branch should be removed without a reason. • Pruning large trees requires special equipment, training, and experience.
• If pruning requires climbing, the use of a chain or hand saw, or the removal of large limbs, personal safety
equipment is a must.

ISA Certified Arboristst" can assist in performing the job safely and reducing the risk of personal injury and damage to your property. They can also determine which type of pruning is necessary to maintain or improve the health, appearance, and safety of your trees.
285

Soil Management
• Soil tests are generally required before fertilizing or adjusting pH.
• Urban landscape trees often exist in soils that lack the nutrients, pH (acidity or alkalinity), drainage, or pore space (air and water space) needed for growth and
development.
• Fertilization based on plant needs can correct many
deficiencies that limit growth. Sometimes soil nutrients may be sufficient, but soil pH levels may prevent plant uptake. In this case, soil amendments, such as sulfur, lime, and even some mulches, can alter soil chemistry and help alleviate plant stress.
• Drainage systems or grading can help correct saturated soil conditions.
• Trenching or earthmoving within the tree's root zone may cause more harm than good.
• Compacted soils can be tilled mechanically or with
compressed air to increase porosity and encourage root
growth.
• When dealing with a mature tree, have the soil tested for nutrient content and texture. An arborist can arrange
to have your soil tested at a soil testing laboratory and recommend treatments based on the results.

Mulching
• Mulching can reduce environmental stress by providing trees with a root environment that has fewer temperature and moisture extremes than the surrounding soil.
• Mulch reduces competition from weeds and grass and
prevents mechanical damage by keeping lawn care
equipment away from the tree's base.
• Mulches made from plant matter will add nutrients to the soil as they decompose and help improve soil biology.
• Mulch should be placed 2-4 inches (5-10 cm) deep. It
should be placed near, but riot touching, the trunk and extend to the dripline (furthest extent of the branches).

If you can't mulch
the full distance, go
as far from the trunk
as possible while
maintaining the
landscape character.

Removal
Although tree removal is a last resort, there are
circumstances when it is necessary. An ISA Certified
Arborist can help decide whether or not a tree should be removed and they possess the skills and equipment to
safely and efficiently remove trees. Removal is
recommended when a tree:
• Is dead, dying, or considered irreparably hazardous.
• Is causing an obstruction or is crowding and causing harm to other trees and the situation is impossible to correct through pruning.

With maintenance, trees can add aesthetic and economic
value to your property. Poorly maintained trees can be a significant liability.

What Is a Certified Arborist?
ISA Certified Arborists are individuals who have
proven a level of knowledge in the art and science
of tree care through experience and by passing a
comprehensive examination developed by some of
the nation's leading experts on tree care.

ISA Certified Arborists must also continue their
education to maintain their certification. Therefore,
they are more I ikely to be up to date on the latest
techniques in arboriculture.

Finding an Arborist
Visit TreesAreGood.org for free tools:
• The "Find an Arborist" tool can help you locate an
arborist in your area.
• The "Verify a Credential" tool enables you to
confirm whether an arborist has an ISA credential.

Be an Informed Consumer
One of the best methods to use in choosing an
arborist is to educate yourself about some of the
basic principles of tree care. Visit TreesAreGooc.org
to read and download all brochures in this series.

ISA ���oD.
www.isa-arbor.com www.treesaregooc.org
©2021 International Society of Arboriculture. (v02.2021) Through research, technology, and education, the International Society of Arboriculture promotes the professional practice of at and fosters a greater worldwide awareness of the benefits of trees. 286

Why Hire an Arborist?
Learn about services that arborists provide, criteria for selecting an arborist, and the benefits of hiring an ISA Certified Arborist'. .A.
gif
1 n
Healthy trees serve many purposes in your local community.

A way to ensure your trees stay healthy is by hiring an arborist. Professional, trained arborists know how to
properly maintain trees for the safety of the public and the health of the tree.

What Is an ISA Certified Arborist?
An ISA arborist certification is a nongovernmental, voluntary process by which individuals can document their base of knowledge. Certification provides a measurable assessment of an individual's knowledge in the competencies needed for proper tree care.

When a professional becomes an ISA Certified Arborist,
they should be recognized by their peers and the public as a tree care professional who has attained a generally - accepted level of knowledge in areas such as tree biology, diagnosis, maintenance practices, safety, and other subject and practice areas within the tree care profession as
identified through periodic job task analyses.

They must also continue their education to maintain their certification. Therefore, they are more likely to be up to date on the latest techniques in arboriculture.

Selecting the Right Arborist for the Job
• Check for an ISA arborist credential. ISA Certified
Arborists and ISA Board Certified Master Arborists'm
are experienced professionals who have passed
comprehensive exams covering all aspects of tree care.
• Check for membership in professional organizations such as the International Society of Arboriculture (ISA), the Tree Care Industry Association (TCIA), or the American
Society of Consulting Arborists (ASCA).
• Ask for proof of insurance and call the insurance company. • Check for local permits and licenses.
• Get more than one estimate and ask for references.
• Don't always accept the lowest bid. Examine the
credentials and the written specifications of the firms that submitted the bids and determine the best combination of price, work to be done, skills and professionalism.
• Be wary of people who go door to door and offer bargains. • ISA certification holders must follow a Code of Ethics and use industry -accepted practices and standards.
• Get it in writing. Most reputable arborists have their clients sign a contract. Read it carefully and ask questions.

Finding an Arborist
Visit TreesAreGooc.org for free tools:
• The "Find an Arborist" tool can help you locate an
arborist in your area.
• The "Verify a Credential" tool enables you to
confirm whether an arborist has an ISA credential.
• ISA credential holders have access to a digital
certificate of their credentials to shared online.

Be an Informed Consumer
One of the best methods to use in choosing an
arborist is to learn some of the basic principles
of tree care. Visit TreesAreGood.org to read and
download all brochures in this series.

Your local garden center, extension agent, or city
arborists are also excellent sources of information if
you should have further questions. They may also be
able to refer you to an ISA Certified Arborist or
ISA Board Certified Master Arborist in your area.
287

Services That Arborists Provide:

Pruning
Arborists can determine the type of pruning necessary to improve the health, appearance, and safety of trees. Pruning may include removing limbs that:
• Interfere with utilities or structures.
• Obstruct streets or sidewalks.
• Are dead, damaged by storms, weak, or decayed,
and pose unacceptable risk.
• Are diseased or insect -infested.

Other pruning strategies improve tree structure, and reduce the likelihood of future damage during storm events.

Planting
Some arborists plant trees, and most recommend species
that are appropriate for certain locations. Selecting the wrong tree can lead to future problems with growing space, insects, diseases, or poor growth.

Emergency Tree Care
Removing or pruning storm -damaged trees can be
dangerous, but an arborist can perform the job safely while reducing further risk of damage to people and property.

Tree Removal
Arborists can help decide if a tree should be removed.

Hiring an arborist is recommended when the tree is:
• Dead, dying, or considered an unacceptable risk.
• Causing an obstruction that is impossible to correct
through pruning.
• Crowding and causing harm to other more desirable trees. • Located in where new construction requires removal.

Other Services
Arborists may also provide other services, including:
• Plant health care or preventive maintenance.
• Cabling and bracing for added support to branches
with weak attachments.
• Soil aeration to improve root growth.
• Installation of lightning protection systems.
• Consulting and legal services relating to trees.
• Tree risk assessment.
• Tree protection during construction.

TRGEES*OD
oO �
• www.tmesamgt
www.isa-arbor.com www.
reesaregooc.org
©2021 International Society of Arboriculture. (v02.2021) Through research, technology, and education, the International Society of Arboriculture promotes the professional practice of or boriculture and fosters a greater worldwide awareness of the benefits of trees, 288

Why Topping
Hurts Trees
Learn why topping is not an acceptable pruning technique and discover recommended alternatives.

Topping is perhaps the most harmful tree pruning practice known. Yet, despite more than 25 years of literature and seminars explaining its harmful effects, topping remains a common practice.

What Is Topping?
Topping is the indiscriminate cutting of tree branches to stubs or to lateral branches that are not large enough to assume the terminal role.

Other names include "heading," "tipping," "hat -racking," and "rounding over."
Topping is often used to reduce the size of a tree.

Homeowners may feel a large tree poses a risk to their
property; however, topping is not a viable method of height reduction, and may increase risk in the long term.
*V*
RIGHT
cs-
Topping Stresses Trees
Leaves are the food factories of a tree; however, topping can remove 50-100% of a tree's leaf -bearing crown. Removing the leaves can potentially starve a tree and trigger various survival mechanisms. Dormant buds are activated, forcing rapid growth of multiple shoots below each cut. The tree needs to grow a new crop of leaves as soon as possible. If a tree does not have the stored energy reserves to do so, it will be seriously weakened and may die.

A stressed tree with large, open pruning wounds is more vulnerable to insect and disease infestations. The tree may lack sufficient energy to chemically defend the wounds
against invasion, and some insects are actually attracted to the chemical signals trees release.

Topping Can Lead to Sunburn
Branches within a tree's crown produce thousands of leaves to absorb sunlight. When the leaves are removed, the
remaining branches and trunk are suddenly exposed to high levels of light and heat. The result may be sunburn of the tissues beneath the bark. which can lead to cankers, bark splitting, and death of some branches.
289

Topping Can Lead to Unacceptable Risk
The survival mechanism that causes a tree to produce
multiple shoots below each topping cut comes at great
expense to the tree (see figure above). These shoots develop from buds near the surface of the old branches. Unlike
normal branches that develop in a socket of overlapping wood tissues, these new shoots are anchored only in the outermost layers of the parent branches and are weakly
attached.

The new shoots grow quickly, as much as 20 feet (6 m) in one year in some species. Unfortunately, the shoots are weakly attached and prone to breaking, especially during windy or icy conditions. While the original goal was to reduce risk by reducing height, risk of limb failure has now increased (see figure below).

Topping Makes Trees Ugly
Topping destroys the natural form of a tree.

Trees form a variety of shapes and growth habits, all with the same goal of presenting their leaves to the sun. Topping removes the ends of the branches, often leaving ugly
stubs. Without leaves (for up to six months of the year in temperate climates), a topped tree appears disfigured and mutilated. A tree that has been topped can never fully
regain its natural form.

Topping Leads to Decay
Correct pruning cuts are made just beyond the branch collar (see figure below). The tree is biologically equipped to close such a wound if the tree is healthy enough and the wound is not too large.

Cuts made indiscriminately between lateral branches create stubs or wounds that the tree may not be able to close. The exposed wood tissues begin to decay. Normally, a tree will "wall off," or compartmentalize, the decaying tissues,
but few trees can defend the multiple severe wounds caused by topping. The decay organisms are given a free path to move through branches.

Branch collar
How to Make a Pruning Cut:

1. Make an undercut about 12-18 inches (30-46 cm) from
the limb's point of attachment.

2. Make a second cut from the top, directly above or a few inches farther out on the limb. Doing so removes the limb, leaving a stub.

3. Remove the stub by cutting back to the branch collar, but do not cut the collar. This technique reduces the
possibility of tearing the bark.
290

lf the tree has started
closing over a stub, cut
just the dead stub and
not the live tissue.

Topping Is Expensive
The cost of topping a tree is not limited to only the job cost.

Some hidden costs include:
• Increased maintenance costs. If the tree survives, it will likely require corrective pruning within a few years (e.g., crown reduction or storm damage repair). If the tree dies, it will have to be removed.
• Reduced property value. Healthy, well -maintained trees can add 10-20% to the value of a property. Disfigured,
topped trees are considered an impending expense.
• Increased liability potential. Topped trees may pose an unacceptable level of risk. Because topping is considered an unacceptable pruning practice, any damage caused by
branch failure of a topped tree may lead to a finding of negligence in a court of law.

Proper branch reduction preserves natural form.

Topping
Alternatives to
Sometimes a tree must be reduced in height or spread,
such as for providing utility line clearance. There are recommended techniques for doing so. Small branches
should be removed back to their point of origin. If a larger limb must be shortened, it should be pruned back to a lateral branch that is large enough (at least one-third the diameter of the limb being removed) to assume the terminal role. This method of branch reduction helps to preserve the natural form of the tree.

Sometimes the best solution is to remove the tree and
replace it with a species that is more appropriate.

What Is a Certified Arborist?
ISA Certified Arborists*. are individuals who have
proven a level of knowledge in the art and science
of tree care through experience and by passing a
comprehensive examination developed by some of
the nation's leading experts on tree care.

ISA Certified Arborists must also continue their
education to maintain their certification. Therefore,
they are more likely to be up to date on the latest
techniques in arboriculture.

Finding an Arborist
Visit .. tools:
• The "Find an Arborist" tool can help you locate an
arborist in your area.
• The "Verify a Credential" tool enables you to
confirm whether an arborist has an ISA credential.

Be an Informed Consumer
One of the best methods to use in choosing an
arborist is to educate yourself about some of the
basic principles of tree care. Visit TreesAreGooc.org
to read and download all brochures in this series.

ISA ATEA
C2021 International Society of Arboricutture. (v02.2021) Through research, technology, and education, the International Society of Arbor iculture promotes the professional practice of arboriculture and fosters a greater worldwide awareness of the benefits of trees. 291

Buying
High -Quality Trees
Discover guidelines for determining tree quality at time of purchase and for identifying problems with tree structure, roots, and injuries. - •

WILTING
LEAVES
Trees serve many purposes
in your local community and
throughout the entire world.

A high -quality tree, when
planted and cared for, can
become a long-lasting asset to
your property. A low -quality tree
may develop costly problems
over time, increasing the need
for maintenance and reducing
the benefits a tree can provide.

What Determines
Tree Quality?
A high -quality tree has:
• A straight trunk with
well -spaced branches.
• An exposed trunk free
of wounds or damage.
• Roots growing straight
out from the trunk.

A low -quality tree has:
• Weak form in which multiple
stems originate from the same
point and branches grow into
each other.
• A trunk with wounds from
handling or incorrect pruning.
• Limited, crushed, or circling
roots in an undersized ball or
container.

These problems can greatly
reduce the tree's prospects for
a healthy and productive life.

When buying a tree, inspect it
carefully to identify problems
related to form, injuries, or roots.

STEMS 15=ti
CODOMINANT .l
ro
0 BAD BRANCH

STRUCTURE

SOIL ON
TRUNK •
,clly4
u o 4-'17%
�1
o .egg
•
u
u
9 '• TRUNK WOUND
• GIRDLING ROOTS
292

Root Problems
Nursery trees are often classified based on how they are produced, harvested, and sold. Each type of tree has a
unique root system:
• Bare root: no soil surrounding roots; usually small trees. • Balled and burlapped: roots of field -grown trees
surrounded by soil and held with burlap and wire or rope. • Container: roots and soil in a container.

Bare Root Stock
Bare roots should not be crushed, torn, desiccated, or
discolored. The ends of the roots should be cleanly cut.

Damaged roots may be cut cleanly prior to planting and
watering. The benefits of bare roots are that they tend to grow straight roots after planting and are easy to transport and plant. They have limitations; however, bare roots need to be planted soon after digging to prevent root drying and may not be suitable for all species.

Balled-and-Burlapped Stock
You should be able to see the trunk flare (the area where the trunk widens and connects with the roots) at the top of the root ball. Avoid buying plants with badly damaged or compressed root balls. The top of the root ball should be flat. Rounding may be an indication of woody root loss.

The diameter of the root ball should be at least 10-12 times the diameter of the trunk as measured 6 inches (15 cm)
above the trunk flare.

Container Stock
• Roots should not twist or circle in the container.
• Remove the root ball from the container for inspection. • Pay special attention to larger, exposed roots.
• Circling roots may girdle (see figure on right) and kill other roots or the entire tree if wrapped around the trunk.
• Fine circling roots may be cut away at planting.
• Larger roots may be straightened if still flexible.
• You should be able to see the basal trunk flare with
container -grown plants. If the trunk flare has been buried, gently expose it before planting the tree, taking care not to damage the bark.

Injuries
Never buy a tree without thoroughly checking the trunk. If the tree is wrapped, remove the wrap and inspect the trunk for wounds, incorrect pruning cuts, and insect injuries. Wrap can be used to protect the trunk during transit, but should be removed after planting.

A correct pruning cut removes the branch just outside of the collar. A ring, or "doughnut," of sound tissues then grows around the cut (see figure above). Do not make cuts flush to the trunk. Trunk tissues above and below a flush -cut branch often die, creating dead spots. When high summer or low winter temperatures occur, cracks or long, dead streaks may develop above and below the dead spots.
(Figure below) Girdling root as tree matures.
293

Good structure
Form
• When buying a young shade tree it is important to note that the branches you see may not be present at maturity.

Many Tower branches will be shaded out as the tree
grows, or pruned away to allow clearance for pedestrians, traffic, mowing, or other activities.
• Many nurseries prune young trees to spur crown growth.

This may lead to issues that must be addressed later with corrective pruning.
• Good strong form —branch architecture —starts with
branches evenly spaced along the trunk. Branches should have firm, sturdy attachments to the trunk.
• Branches with narrow angles of attachment may cause
problems later.
• When several branches are growing at the same position on the trunk, the likelihood of weak attachments,
compression, and cracks increases greatly.
• Branches that press against the trunk or each other
signal problems. These areas of contact may become
compressed, crack, or die back.
• If you desire a tree with multiple trunks, make certain that the trunks are well separated at the ground line.

Remember, trunks expand in diameter as they grow. Two
trunks may be slightly separated when small, but as they grow the trunks will squeeze together.
• When planting remove only broken or torn branches to
allow the tree to recover from the stress of transplanting. • Many architectural issues can be addressed through
corrective pruning or training. Begin corrective pruning one year after planting and space over several years.

Poor structure
What Is a Certified Arborist?
ISA Certified Arborists*are individuals who have
proven a level of knowledge in the art and science
of tree care through experience and by passing a
comprehensive examination developed by some of
the nation's leading experts on tree care.

ISA Certified Arborists must also continue their
education to maintain their certification. Therefore,
they are more likely to be up to date on the latest
techniques in arboriculture.

Finding an Arborist
Visit TreesAreGood.orgforfree tools and to read
and all brochures in this series.
• The "Find an Arborist" tool can help you locate an
arborist in your area.
• The "Verify a Credential" tool enables you to
confirm whether an arborist has an ISA credential.

TREES
AE W D•
www.isa-arbor.com • www.treesaregood.org
C20211n temational Society of Arboriculture. (v02.2021) Through research, technology, and education, the International Society of Arboriculture promotes the professional practice of arboriculture and fosters a greater worldwide awareness of the benefits of trees. 294

Tree Selection
and Placement
Understand the various factors to consider when selecting trees. (p4\
Tree selection and placement are important decisions a
homeowner makes when landscaping or replacing a tree.

Matching the tree to the site benefits both the tree and the homeowner.

Before asking, "What kind of tree should I plant?" consider the following:
• Why is it being planted and what function will it serve? • What are the soil conditions?
• How will necessary maintenance be provided?
• What size tree is best suited for the location? How large will the tree be when full grown? Do overhead or below
ground utilities prevent planting a tree? What clearance is needed for sidewalks, patios, or driveways?
Form and Size
Selecting the right form (shape) to complement the desired function can reduce maintenance costs and increase the
tree's value.
• Mature tree size determines the level of benefits received. • Larger trees typically provide the greatest economic and environmental returns.
• Depending on the site restrictions, you can choose from hundreds of form and size combinations.
• Low spreading trees may be planted under overhead
utility lines, while a tall evergreen may provide a screen.

Tree Functions
• Healthy trees increase property values.
• Deciduous shade trees cool homes in the summer and allow the winter sun to heat homes when they lose their leaves. • Evergreens can provide a windbreak or a screen for privacy. • Fruit trees or shrubs can provide food for owners or wildlife. • Street trees reduce the glare from pavement, reduce
runoff, filter pollutants, add oxygen, and improve overall appearance and quality of life.
• Trees also provide environmental benefits such reducing the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.
295

Site Conditions
Choosing a tree for the right
site conditions is the key to
tree survival and reduced
maintenance. Consider the
following:

Soil conditions
• The soil in dense urban
areas and new subdivisions
is often disturbed, shallow,
compacted, and subject
to drought. An arborist
can take soil samples
from your yard for testing
to determine which
trees are suited for your
property and may provide
recommendations to
improve the soil condition.

Exposure (sun and wind)
• The amount of available
sunlight will affect tree
and shrub selection. Wind
exposure is also a consideration.

WIND

EXISTING

STRUCTURES
r,!1‘(. r((lid
e

CLIMATE
LIGHT
Space constraints
• Available planting space can be limited by many factors, such as overhead or underground utilities, pavement,
buildings, visibility, or other trees. Ensure there's
adequate room to let trees grow above and below ground.

Hardiness zone
• Hardiness is the tree's ability to survive extreme
temperatures of a specific region. Research plants for
their hardiness information in your region.

Human activity
• The top five causes of tree death result from things people do. Soil compaction, under -watering, overwatering,
vandalism, and the number -one cause — planting the
wrong tree — account for more tree deaths than all insect - and disease -related tree deaths combined.

Drainage
• Roots require oxygen to develop; poor drainage limits oxygen availability and may kill the tree.

Insect and disease susceptibility
• Every plant has its particular pest and disease
problems and the severity varies geographically.

Personal preferences and site constraints also play major roles in the selection process.

PLANTING SPACE

ABOVE AND

BELOW GROUND

EXISTING
PLANTS
PH

DRAINAGE

HARDINESS
SOIL

COMPACTION
What Is a Certified Arborist?
ISA Certified Arborists are individuals who have
proven a level of knowledge in the art and science
of tree care through experience and by passing a
comprehensive examination developed by some of
the nation's leading experts on tree care.

ISA Certified Arborists must also continue their
education to maintain their certification. Therefore,
they are more I ikely to be up to date on the latest
techniques in arboriculture.

Finding an Arborist
Visit TreesAreGood.org for free tools and to read
and download all brochures in this series.
• The "Find an Arborist" tool can help you locate an
arborist in your area.
• The "Verify a Credential" tool enables you to
confirm whether an arborist has an ISA credential.

ISATREES Cp D•
www.isa-arbor.com www. reesaregooc.org
©2021 International Society of Arboriculture. (v03.2021) Through research, technology, and education, the International Society of Arboriculture promotes the professional practice of arboriculture and fosters a greater worldwide awareness of the benefits of trees. 296

1. Do you consider neighborhood trees a valuable community asset that contributes to your quality of life in Bellflower? More details • Agree 549
• Somewhat Agree 20
• Somewhat Disagree 2
• Disagree 2
96%

2. In your personal opinion. what is the most important benefit to planting and caring for trees in the Bellflower commun ity? (Pick your top 3) More details
• Improving the Environment (air/water 437
quality)
• Providing Shade 313
• Mitigating Climate Change 174
• Enhancing Neighborhood Aesthetics 256
• Reducing Pollution 100
• Improving Mental and Physical Health 191
• Providing Privacy from Neighbors 17
• Providing Habitat for Wildlife 171
0 100 200 200 400 500
NA#CA.
298

3. Across the City of Bellflower do you feel that there are too many trees, the right amount, or not enough? (select one) More details 6%
• Too many trees 3
• The right amount of trees 36
• Not enough trees 532
93%

4. Do you believe that public trees seem well cared for in the City of Bellflower? More details • Agree 147
• Somewhat Agree 291
• Somewhat Disagree 101
• Disagree 31
5%
v
51%

5. Please indicate your preference of tree type for future planting projects. (Please choose only 1) More details • Evergreen trees for year-round shade 272
• Deciduous trees for fall color 110
• Flowering trees for showy blossoms 70
• No preference 118
NA#CA.
299

6. Where do you feel new trees should be planted? (Select as many as you like) More details • In parkways in front of homes 439
• Along major boulevards 498
• In parks 464
• Around schools 434

7. Of the following tree problems. which is most concerning to you? (Drag and reorder to rank responses from MOST CO NCERNED to LEAST CONCERNED) More details
1 Hardscape damage from roots
2 Property damage from falling limbs/trees
3 Conflict with overhead utility wires
4 Leaf -feeding pests
5 Tree litter
6 Cost to the city for maintenance

8. Which answer best reflects how you most often interact with the City of Bellflower's urban forest? (select 1) More ceta,i_ • I am a resident and have a street tree
• I work in the city and travel on city streets and
sidewalks
• I use city parks for recreation
310
82 171
NA#CA.
300

9. If you have a favorite tree, what is it? Fill in the blank, or N/A. More details 421
Responses
134 respondents (32%) answered trees for this question.

Latest Responses
"Palms"
tree they have beautiful evergreen trees blossom tree
Olive tree fruit trees favorite CA tree
oak trees trees Native trees
Palm trees Maple tree Myrtle tree
ginkgo trees Willow trees pine trees eucalyptus tree
large trees Magnolia trees Jacaranda tree
trees and plants

10. If you don't not like a certain species of tree, what is it? Fill in the blank, or N/A. More details 381
Responses
109 respondents (29%) answered trees for this question.

OF BELLI-10w,
4/14A
gum tree Pepper tree Palm trees
tree that is not
Tree of Heaven Trees that has saps Flowering trees
invasive trees Pine trees trees native trees
male trees Trees that drop
Latest Responses
"Na"
resistant trees
tree that has a bad
cypress trees
Jacaranda Tree eucalyptus tree
EverGreen Trees elm or any other tree
NA#CA.
301

11. Is there anything else you would like to tell us about trees in your community? Fill in the blank or N/A More details 368
Responses
197 respondents (54°o) answered Trees for this question.

Trees make our community
idea and trees
Latest Responses
"Na"
Trees make it seem cooler
trees between bellflower tree for shadeneighborhood trees Trees
trees on Artesia trees on the street
planted trees
tree lined
shady trees
new trees
trees in our city palm trees
Fruit tree Native trees parks have less trees
lot more trees tree could be a nice
t..{ BELLi op 'L(1k,
C` 14A ,
k k`�
NA#CA.
302

„I of LLFL O
Gt� ''''-ii,
GRo, ET�tig
staffIeport
15-Q
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
ATTENTION: Ryan Smoot, City Manager
FROM: Anna Garan, Director of Finance
SUBJECT: Consideration and possible action to receive and file Warrant Register No. 26-102, dated April 27, 2026.

DATE: April 27, 2026

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
BMC § 2.12.030.B stipulates that the Director of Finance is responsible for the preparation of warrant registers for the City Manager and City Council. In addition, Section X.B of the Budget, Financial and Administrative Policies stipulates the City's process in executing warrants for the payment of goods and services, as well as the requirement to make each warrant register a matter of public record by placing it on the City Council Agenda as a Consent Calendar item.

RECOMMENDATION
1) Receive and file Warrant Register No. 26-102; or
2) Alternatively, discuss and take other action related to this item.

FISCAL IMPACT
$7,176,501.46 in expenditures.

ATTACHMENT
Warrant Register No. 26-102 2

CITY OF BELLFLOWER
(Warrant Register No. 26-102 Dated April 27, 2026)

WARRANT REGISTER FUND SUMMARY
Fund No. CITY OF BELLFLOWER:
010 General Fund
011 General Fund Projects
030 Grant Projects Fund
037 Drug Education/Rehabilitation Fund
090 Agency Fund/Refundable Deposits - Private Projects
100 Proposition A Fund - Transportation
125 Measure R Fund - Transportation / Streets
135 Proposition C Fund - Transportation / Streets
145 Road Maintanence and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA) Fund 320 Measure W Fund - Water
510 Economic Development Fund
530 IT/Equipment Replacement Fund
540 GIS Update Fund
542 General Plan/Zoning Ordinance Update Fund
600 Building and Safety Fund
602 Accessibility Compliance Fund
720 Debt Service Fund - BFA (Transportation COPS)
900 Community Development Block Grant Fund
910 HOME Fund
944 Parking District No. 1 Fund
974 Low and Moderate Income Housing Asset Fund
Total Accounts Payable
011 General Fund Projects — Condemnation Fund Deposit Disbursement Payroll Check/ACH Payments
(Pay Period Ending 4/3/26, 4/8/26, 4/9/26 and 4/17/26)
Total Expenditures - City
$ 891,530.03
1,387,413.16
2,167,827.60
259.26
17,561.52
84,420.55
3,116.90
1,971.19
47,772.50
24,987.64
2,148.11
157,043.13
(6.18)
(18.55)
(110.96)
653.66
61,007.50
21,432.19
2,574.97
284.18
23,918.57
4,895,786.97
1,950,000.00
330,714.49
$ 7,176,501.46
https://bellflowergcc.sharepoint.com/sites/fin/Shared Documents/Warrant Registers/Warrant Register Cover Page Template

REPORT.: 04/20/26
RUN • 04/20/26
Run By.: Eligio Marquez
City of Bellflower
Cash Disbursement Report by Vendor
PAGE: 001
ID #: PYVP
CTL.: BEL
Invoice No
VENDOR.: 36003 (360 MARTIAL ARTS ACADEMY, LLD)
---- WARRANT DISTRIBUTION
Number Date Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr Description
B260325 XXXXXX 04/08/26 3900.00 010 42534 5000 INSTRUCTOR FEE/KARATE/2/23/26-3/25/26 Vendor's Total = 3900.00
Invoice No
198773
20807170
VENDOR.: ACC03 (ACCO ENGINEERED SYSTEMS, INC)
---- WARRANT DISTRIBUTION
Number Date Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr Description
XXXXXX 04/06/26
XXXXXX 04/17/26
22509.00
468.00
Vendor's Total = 22977.00
010 46033 3900 REHAB/FOUNTAIN PUMP,MOTOR VAULT/LIBRARY GARDEN 010 46026 3900 ON -CALL MAINTENANCE/VFD/PALM ST.PARK/TO#9 Invoice No
VENDOR.: ALL12 (ALL CITY MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC.)
---- WARRANT DISTRIBUTION
Number Date Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr Description
INV105012 XXXXXX 04/16/26 13722.80 010 42054 2050 3/15-28/26 SCHOOL CROSSING GUARD SVCS/AFN 245.1 Vendor's Total = 13722.80
Invoice No
VENDOR.: ALL22 (ALLIANT INSURANCE SERVICES, INC.)
---- WARRANT DISTRIBUTION
Number Date Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr Description
3473219 XXXXXX 04/06/26 2177.00 010 36656 01/26-03/26 SPECIAL EVENT INSURANCE Vendor's Total = 2177.00
Invoice No
66FCCHQ4R
VENDOR.: AMA01 (AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES)
---- WARRANT DISTRIBUTION
Number Date Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr Description
XXXXXX 04/16/26 24.75 010 43100 3000 PUBLIC WORKS SUPPLIES Vendor's Total = 24.75

REPORT.: 04/20/26
RUN • 04/20/26
Run By.: Eligio Marquez
City of Bellflower
Cash Disbursement Report by Vendor
PAGE: 002
ID #: PYVP
CTL.: BEL
Invoice No
23131756
- --- WARRANT
Number Date
XXXXXX 04/06/26
Vendor's Total =
VENDOR.: AME44 (AMERICAN RED CROSS)

DISTRIBUTION
Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr Description
1260.00 010 43020 8000
1260.00
STAFF CPR,FIRST AID CERTIFICATIONS (QTY 29)
Invoice No
763642
VENDOR.: ANI01 (ANIMAL PEST MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC.)
- --- WARRANT
Number Date
XXXXXX 04/06/26
Vendor's Total =

DISTRIBUTION
Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr Description
2750.00 010 42054 2000
2750.00
02/26/26 COYOTE ABATEMENT SERVICES/AFN 1033.1
Invoice No
B260406
- --- WARRANT
Number Date
XXXXXX 04/16/26
Vendor's Total =
VENDOR.: ARG00 (GABRIEL ARGOTT)

DISTRIBUTION
Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr Description
173.04 010 43110 3900
173.04

REIMBURSEMENT WORK BOOTS
Invoice No
12817
12919
- --- WARRANT
Number Date
xxxxxx 04/06/26
XXXXXX 04/06/26
Vendor's Total =
VENDOR.: AVA01 (ADVANCED AVANT-GARDE INC.)

DISTRIBUTION
Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr Description
200.00
150.00
300.00
300.00
200.00
150.00
150.00
696.25
3911.25
275.00
6332.50
910
910
910
910
910
910
910
910
900
900
44100
44100
44100
44100
44100
44100
44100
42054
42054
42054
4215
4215
4215
4215
4215
4215
4215
4210
4150
4152
113
114
115
116
117
I18
I20
02/26
02/26
02/26
02/26
02/26
02/26
02/26
02/26
02/26
02/26
CONSULTANT/HIP 1077
CONSULTANT/HIP 1078
CONSULTANT/HIP 1079
CONSULTANT/HIP 1080
CONSULTANT/HIP 1081
CONSULTANT/HIP 1062
CONSULTANT/HIP 1084

CONSULTANT/HOME ADMIN

CONSULTANT/CDBG ADMIN

CONSULTANT/CODE ENFORCEMENT CDBG

REPORT.: 04/20/26
RUN • 04/20/26
Run By.: Eligio Marquez
City of Bellflower
Cash Disbursement Report by Vendor
PAGE: 003
ID #: PYVP
CTL.: BEL
Invoice No
VENDOR.: BAY04 (BAY AREA DRIVING SCHOOL)
- --- WARRANT DISTRIBUTION
Number Date Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr Description
B260330 XXXXXX 04/08/26 509.60 010 42534 5000 INSTRUCTOR FEE/ONLINE DRIVER'S ED/9/22/25-6/7/26 Vendor's Total = 509.60
Invoice No
VENDOR.: BEL02 (BELLFLOWER -SOMERSET MUTUAL WATER COMPANY) - --- WARRANT DISTRIBUTION
Number Date Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr Description
B260327 XXXXXX 04/16/26
B260327A XXXXXX 04/16/26
7136.28
2878.72
438.76
205.55
Vendor's Total = 10659.31
010 43212 3100
010 43212 3900
010 43212 3100
010 43212 3900
01/13/26-03/20/26 WATER
01/13/26-03/20/26 WATER
02/20/26-03/19/26 RECLAIMED WATER
02/20/26-03/19/26 RECLAIMED WATER
Invoice No
VENDOR.: BIR02 (CHRISTINA JOY PADILLA BIRKEY)
- --- WARRANT DISTRIBUTION
Number Date Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr Description
B260406 XXXXXX 04/16/26 150.00 010 41000 1030 04/06/26 PLANNING COMMISSION STIPEND Vendor's Total = 150.00
Invoice No
4499354
4499384
VENDOR.: BLU01 (BLUE DIAMOND MATERIALS)
- --- WARRANT DISTRIBUTION
Number Date Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr Description
XXXXXX 04/08/26
XXXXXX 04/08/26
837.63
1386.03
Vendor's Total = 2223.66
010 43160 3100
010 43160 3100

ASPHALT

ASPHALT
Invoice No
VENDOR.: BNY01 (THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON)
- --- WARRANT DISTRIBUTION
Number Date Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr Description
B260326H XXXXXX 03/26/26 59656.04 100 49000 9999
2021 COPS DEBT SERVICE PAYMENT/INTEREST

REPORT.: 04/20/26
RUN • 04/20/26
Run By.: Eligio Marquez
City of Bellflower
Cash Disbursement Report by Vendor
PAGE: 004
ID #: PYVP
CTL.: BEL
Invoice No
VENDOR.: BNY01 (THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON) ..Continue.. - --- WARRANT DISTRIBUTION
Number Date Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr Description
B260326H XXXXXX 03/26/26 -59656.04 720 39000
59656.04 720 10820
B260401H XXXXXX 04/01/26 61007.50 720 48208 5540
Vendor's Total = 120663.54
2021 COPS DEBT SERVICE PAYMENT/INTEREST
2021 COPS DEBT SERVICE PAYMENT/INTEREST
2021 COPS DEBT SERVICE PAYMENT/INTEREST
Invoice No
VENDOR.: BRU04 (KATHRYN BRUN)
- --- WARRANT DISTRIBUTION
Number Date Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr Description
B260331 XXXXXX 04/16/26 20.00 010 41100 4100 MILEAGE,PARK'G/1/28/26 LARIAC CONSORTIUM Vendor's Total = 20.00
Invoice No
363449
362482
362483
VENDOR.: BUR01 (BURKE,WILLIAMS & SORENSEN, LLP)
- --- WARRANT DISTRIBUTION
Number Date Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr Description
XXXXXX 04/06/26
XXXXXX 04/09/26
XXXXXX 04/09/26
5661.20 010 42032 8010 TSS 02/26 LEGAL SERVICES/20434 S.SANTA FE AVE, LLC 21197.00 010 42032 1400 02/26 LEGAL SERVICES/RETAINER
417.20 010 42098 1400 02/26 LEGAL SERVICES/GENERAL LITIGATION 3354.80 010 42032 1400 02/26 LEGAL SERVICES/MCJ PETRO TANKLINES V.BLFR. 1028.00 010 42032 1350 02/26 LEGAL SERVICES/HR/LABOR & EMPLOYMENT 3446.74 010 42032 4105 02/26 LEGAL SERVICES/CE GEN/MEETINGS,FILING FEES 2112.00 900 42032 4152 02/26 LEGAL SERVICES/CE CDBG/9070 ARTESIA

26.40 900 42032 4152 02/26 LEGAL SERVICES/CE CDBG/9911 PARK 158.40 900 42032 4152 02/26 LEGAL SVCS/CE CDBG/15741 WOODRUFF(GQC SPA) 158.40 900 42032 4152 02/26 LEGAL SVCS/CE CDBG/15751 WOODRUFF 1848.00 900 42032 4152 02/26 LEGAL SVCS/CE CDBG/17207 CLARK 105.60 010 42032 4105 02/26 LEGAL SVCS/CE GEN/CRIMINAL PROSECUTION BMC 11985.60 900 42032 4152 02/26 LEGAL SVCS/CE CDBG/9103 ARTESIA

79.20 900 42032 4152 02/26 LEGAL SVCS/CE CDBG/17450 BLFR 324.80 010 36000 02/26 LEGAL SVCS/DEV.REIMB/9741 WALNUT 1624.00 010 36000 02/26 LEGAL SVCS/DEV.REIMB/15908 BLFR 243.60 090 20502 02/26 LEGAL SVCS/DEV.REIM/9903 FLWR(CITY VENTURES) 162.40 090 20522 TGH 2/26 LEGAL SVC/DEV.REIM/8825 ARTESIA(SELF STORAGE) 11588.54 010 42032 1400 CBP 02/26 LEGAL SERVICES/GEN LEGAL/CBP ADMIN.

Vendor's Total = 65521.88

REPORT.: 04/20/26
RUN • 04/20/26
Run By.: Eligio Marquez
City of Bellflower
Cash Disbursement Report by Vendor
PAGE: 005
ID #: PYVP
CTL.: BEL
Invoice No
1 2
- --- WARRANT
Number Date
XXXXXX 04/16/26
XXXXXX 04/16/26
VENDOR.: CAL98 (CALIFORNIA WATERS, LLC)

DISTRIBUTION
Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr Description
154908.50 011 47220 9000 109
- 7745.43 011 20400 109
147600.00 030 47220 9000 109
- 7380.00 030 20400 109
67395.50 011 47220 9000 109
- 3369.77 011 20400 109
3695.00 030 47220 9000 109
-184.75 030 20400 109
Vendor's Total = 354919.05
02/26 AQUATIC CTR.OUTDOOR POOL
RETENTION/2/26 BAC CTR.OUTDOOR
02/26 AQUATIC CTR.OUTDOOR POOL
RETENTION/2/26 BAC CTR.OUTDOOR
03/26 AQUATIC CTR.OUTDOOR POOL
RETENTION/3/26 BAC CTR.OUTDOOR
03/26 AQUATIC CTR.OUTDOOR POOL
RETENTION/3/26 BAC CTR.OUTDOOR
IMP/SP#23/24-06R
POOL IMP/#23/24-06R
IMP/SP#23/24-06R
POOL IMP/#23/24-06R
IMP/SP#23/24-06R
POOL IMP/#23/24-06R
IMP/SP#23/24-06R
POOL IMP/#23/24-06R
Invoice No
B260331
- --- WARRANT
Number Date
XXXXXX 04/16/26
Vendor's Total =
VENDOR.: COR09 (ELIZABETH OBA)
Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr

60.95 010 41100 4100

60.95 DISTRIBUTION
Description
PARKING/3/11-12/26 PLANNING ACADEMY
Invoice No
123866398
---- WARRANT
Number Date
XXXXXX 04/16/26
Vendor's Total =
VENDOR.: COS00 (COSTAR REALTY INFORMATION, INC.)
Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr
902.14 510 47299 4002
902.14

DISTRIBUTION
Description
04/26 SUBSCRIPTION/REAL ESTATE PLATFORM/AFN 1077
Invoice No
B260403
- --- WARRANT
Number Date
XXXXXX 04/08/26
Vendor's Total =
VENDOR.: CPR03 (CPRS )

DISTRIBUTION
Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr Description
850.00 010 41200 5000
850.00
FY26/27 CPRS MEMBERSHIP DUES (QTY 5)

REPORT.: 04/20/26
RUN • 04/20/26
Run By.: Eligio Marquez
City of Bellflower
Cash Disbursement Report by Vendor
PAGE: 006
ID #: PYVP
CTL.: BEL
Invoice No
209044
VENDOR.: CRA06 (CRAFTWATER ENGINEERING, INC.)
---- WARRANT DISTRIBUTION
Number Date Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr Description
XXXXXX 04/16/26
5170.00 320 47013 9000 106 02/26 DESIGN SVCS/SP/S/W CAPTURE PROJECT/AFN 923 Vendor's Total = 5170.00
Invoice No
B260403
VENDOR.: DIV05 (DIVISION OF THE STATE ARCHITECT)
- --- WARRANT DISTRIBUTION
Number Date Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr Description
XXXXXX 04/08/26
450.80
202.86
-202.86
Vendor's Total = 450.80
602 31654
602 49000 9999
010 39000
01/26-03/26 SB1186 QUARTERLY FEES
01/26-03/26 SB1186 QUARTERLY FEES/5% ADMIN.FEES
01/26-03/26 SB1186 QUARTERLY FEES/5% ADMIN.FEES
Invoice No
2608
2609
VENDOR.: DUA02 (DUANE MORITA)
- --- WARRANT DISTRIBUTION
Number Date Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr Description
XXXXXX 04/08/26
XXXXXX 04/08/26
7040.00
320.00
Vendor's Total = 7360.00
010 42054 4100 03/26 CONSULTANT/ENVIRONMENTAL
090 20502 03/26 CONSULTANT/CITY VENTURES BELLFLOWER 5
Invoice No
B260407
VENDOR.: ELY01 (ELYSIAN ARTS & EVENTS, LLC DBA SOCA ARTS) - --- WARRANT DISTRIBUTION
Number Date Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr Description
XXXXXX 04/16/26
1330.55 010 42534 5000
Vendor's Total = 1330.55
INSTRUCTOR FEE/BALLET/3/3/26-4/7/26
Invoice No
VENDOR.: EME03 (CAROLYN HARSHMAN)
---- WARRANT DISTRIBUTION
Number Date Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr Description
B260410 XXXXXX 04/16/26 15000.00 010 42222 2400 01/26-03/26 HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN UPD/AFN 381.2 Vendor's Total = 15000.00

REPORT.: 04/20/26
RUN • 04/20/26
Run By.: Eligio Marquez
City of Bellflower
Cash Disbursement Report by Vendor
PAGE: 007
ID #: PYVP
CTL.: BEL
Invoice No
8935618H
8929991H
8935829H
- --- WARRANT
Number Date
XXXXXX
XXXXXX
XXXXXX
04/08/26
04/09/26
04/09/26
Vendor's Total =
VENDOR.: EMP05 (EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT)

DISTRIBUTION
Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr Description
330.00
18584.49
211.91
19126.40
010 23080
010 23080
010 23080

PIT - SETTLEMENT PAYMENT
PIT - PPE 4/3/26 PD 4/9/26

PIT - FINAL
Invoice No
B260401
- --- WARRANT
Number Date
XXXXXX 04/16/26
Vendor's Total =
VENDOR.: FRO07 (FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS)

DISTRIBUTION
Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr Description

48.37 010 43300 3900 ECF 04/26 TELEPHONE SERVICES/TGIS

48.37 Invoice No
B260403
- --- WARRANT
Number Date
XXXXXX 04/06/26
Vendor's Total =
VENDOR.: GAR06 (ANDREA B. CALIP TRUST)

DISTRIBUTION
Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr Description
5300.00
-1272.00
-371.00
3657.00
010 43410 2000
010 20230
010 20230
04/26 RENT/SUBSTATION
04/26 RENT/SUBSTATION LESS FIT 24%
04/26 RENT/SUBSTATION LESS STATE TAX 7%
Invoice No
359010A
359530A
359552A
359578A
- --- WARRANT
Number Date
XXXXXX 04/16/26
XXXXXX 04/16/26
XXXXXX 04/16/26
XXXXXX 04/16/26
Vendor's Total
VENDOR.: GLA01 (GLASBY MAINTENANCE SUPPLY)
Amount Paid G/L Account No
872.88
711.10
236.00
391.55

70.00 97.24
2378.77
010 46010 3900
010 46011 3900
010 46013 3900
010 46010 3900
010 46020 3900
010 46029 3900

DISTRIBUTION
Ctr Description

JANITORIAL SUPPLIES

JANITORIAL SUPPLIES

JANITORIAL SUPPLIES

JANITORIAL SUPPLIES

JANITORIAL SUPPLIES

JANITORIAL SUPPLIES

REPORT.: 04/20/26
RUN • 04/20/26
Run By.: Eligio Marquez
City of Bellflower
Cash Disbursement Report by Vendor
PAGE: 008
ID #: PYVP
CTL.: BEL
Invoice No
INV125519
INV125554
INV125993
INV125994
VENDOR.: GOL12 (GOLDEN STAR TECHNOLOGY INC. (GST))
- --- WARRANT DISTRIBUTION
Number Date Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr Description
XXXXXX 04/16/26
XXXXXX 04/16/26
XXXXXX 04/16/26
XXXXXX 04/16/26
237.16
715.50
5912.89
5912.89
Vendor's Total = 12778.44
530 47299 9501
530 42054 9501
530 42054 9501
530 42054 9501
IT SOFTWARE SUBSCRIPTON/POWER APPS (QTY 4)
3/3/26 IT SUPPORT & MAINTENANCE/EXTRA DAY
02/26 IT SUPPORT & MAINTENANCE/AFN 663.2
03/26 IT SUPPORT & MAINTENANCE/AFN 663.2
Invoice No
VENDOR.: GOSO1 (STEVE GOSE)
- --- WARRANT DISTRIBUTION
Number Date Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr Description
B260403 XXXXXX 04/16/26 188.87 010 43110 3900 REIMBURSE WORK BOOTS Vendor's Total = 188.87
Invoice No
VENDOR.: GOV04 (GOVEASE AUCTIONS LLC)
- --- WARRANT DISTRIBUTION
Number Date Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr Description
B260401H XXXXXX 04/01/26 20000.49 010 12900 DEPOSIT/15751 BLAINE AVE/LA COUNTY AUCTION Vendor's Total = 20000.49
Invoice No
844381237
VENDOR.: GRA06 (GRAINGER, INC.)
- --- WARRANT DISTRIBUTION
Number Date Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr Description
XXXXXX 04/16/26 20.53 010 46013 3900 PUBLIC WORKS SUPPLIES Vendor's Total = 20.53
Invoice No
1098295
VENDOR.: HAS03 (HASA INC)
---- WARRANT DISTRIBUTION
Number Date Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr Description
XXXXXX 04/17/26 151.45 010 43100 3900 POOL CHEMICALS

REPORT.: 04/20/26
RUN • 04/20/26
Run By.: Eligio Marquez
City of Bellflower
Cash Disbursement Report by Vendor
PAGE: 009
ID #: PYVP
CTL.: BEL
Invoice No
1099294
1103327
1106997
1107960
---- WARRANT
Number Date
XXXXXX
XXXXXX
XXXXXX
XXXXXX
04/17/26
04/17/26
04/17/26
04/17/26
Vendor's Total =
VENDOR.: HAS03 (HASA INC) ..Continue..

Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr
760.43
189.12
157.30
651.96
1910.26
010 43100 3900
010 43100 3900
010 43100 3900
010 43100 3900

DISTRIBUTION
Description

POOL CHEMICALS

POOL CHEMICALS

POOL CHEMICALS

POOL CHEMICALS
Invoice No
SIN061778
SIN061800
SIN060760
---- WARRANT
Number Date
XXXXXX
XXXXXX
XXXXXX
04/06/26
04/06/26
04/08/26
VENDOR.: HDL03 (HDL SOFTWARE LLC)
Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr
109.06

93.06 14492.23
Vendor's Total = 14694.35
010 42030 1300
010 42030 1300
010 42030 1300

DISTRIBUTION
Description
01/26 BUSINESS LICENSE PAYMENT PROCESSING FEE
02/26 BUSINESS LICENSE PAYMENT PROCESSING FEE
04/26-03/27 BUS.LIC.SOFTWARE MAINT(NET OF CREDITS)
Invoice No
721190
---- WARRANT
Number Date
XXXXXX 04/08/26
Vendor's Total =
VENDOR.: HIL05 (THE HILLER COMPANIES, LLC)

DISTRIBUTION
Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr Description
875.00 010 46000 8010
875.00
REPAIR FIRE ALARM/8831 CEDAR/NEW HOPE
Invoice No
B260317H
---- WARRANT
Number Date
XXXXXX 03/17/26
VENDOR.: IMP03 (U.S. BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS)

DISTRIBUTION
Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr Description

66.29 010 43100 1300

56.88 010 41100 1000
353.60 010 41100 1000

10.17 010 42015 1350

11.18 010 43092 1350

62.16 010 43092 1350

30.00 010 43092 1350

TONER CARTRIDGE/OFFICE SUPPLIES
2/23/26 CITY COUNCIL MEETING EXPENSE
2/23/26 CITY COUNCIL MEETING EXPENSE

SUPPLIES/EMPLOYEE RECOGNITION/PHOTO FRAME

RECRUITMENT/PW DIVISION HEAD STREETS/LUNCH

RECRUITMENT/PW DIVISION HEAD STREETS/LUNCH

RECRUITMENT/PW DIVISION HEAD STREETS/COFFEE

REPORT.: 04/20/26
RUN • 04/20/26
Run By.: Eligio Marquez
City of Bellflower
Cash Disbursement Report by Vendor
PAGE: 010
ID #: PYVP
CTL.: BEL
Invoice No
VENDOR.: IMP03 (U.S. BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS) ..Continue.. ---- WARRANT DISTRIBUTION
Number Date Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr Description
B260317H XXXXXX 03/17/26

35.11 010 43100 1350 OFFICE SUPPLIES

61.08 010 43092 1350 RECRUITMENT FOLDERS/OFFICE SUPPLIES 2380.00 010 41100 4000 REG/4/15-17/26/CALED 2026 CONF (QTY 4)

88.06 010 43100 4000 COMPUTER CABLES (QTY 2)

55.97 510 44547 4002 SBA REFRESHMENTS/BELLFLOWER ENTREPRENEURIAL ACADEMY

9.00 010 43100 4000 CAR WASH/CITY VAN
595.00 510 44410 4002 REG/3/10-12/26/IDA&CDA CONF/LONG BEACH 595.00 510 44410 4002 REG/3/10-12/26/IDA&CDA CONF/LONG BEACH 1000.00 010 41100 1000 CRD REG/5/14-17/26/CCCA CONF/INDIAN WELLS 1000.00 010 41100 1000 CKD REG/5/14-17/26/CCCA CONF/INDIAN WELLS 729.30 010 41320 1000 CITY TILE PLAQUES (QTY 12)
1000.00 010 41100 1100 REG/5/14-17/26/CCCA CONF/INDIAN WELLS

16.56 010 43100 1100 AMAZON PRIME/MEMBERSHIP FEE

20.00 010 41100 1000 CSS REG/2/18/26 CCCA MEETING/LOS ANGELES

20.00 010 41100 1000 CVS REG/2/18/26 CCCA MEETING/LOS ANGELES

50.00 010 41100 1000 CVS REG/3/5/26 LCC MEMBERSHIP MTG/ROSEMEAD 626.38 530 47299 9501 IT SOFTWARE SUBSCRIPTION/2/01-28/26/KASEYA 880.90 530 47401 9501 IT EQUIPMENT/PLANNING/CHECK-IN IPAD

40.92 530 47299 9501 1/22/26-2/21/26 IT SOFTWARE SERVICE/WASABI 2649.75 530 18400 IT EQUIPMENT/DELL PC'S (QTY 2)
198.45 530 46200 9501 IT EQUIPMENT/MOUNT
171.96 530 46200 9501 IT EQUIPMENT/WINDOWS ACTIVATION, SCREEN PROTECTOR 464.07 530 46200 9501 IT EQUIPMENT/WINDOWS ACTIVATION (QTY 3) 1105.00 530 46200 9501 IT EQUIPMENT/REPLACEMENT NETWORK SWITCH 673.69 530 46200 9501 IT EQUIPMENT/ACCESS POINTS/CP & TP/UBIQUITI

49.00 530 47299 9501 IT SOFTWARE SVC/02/1/26-08/22/26 APPLE UNIFIED

60.00 530 47299 9501 IT SOFTWARE SVC/02/27/26-03/27/26 OPEN AI

30.96 530 47299 9501 IT SOFTWARE SVC/01/30/26-02/28/26 BUSINESS APPLE 240.00 530 47299 9501 IT SOFTWARE SVC/02/03/26-03/02/26 MICROSOFT 3105.00 530 47299 9501 IT SOFTWARE SVC/02/03/26-03/02/26 MICROSOFT

90.00 530 47299 9501 IT SOFTWARE SVC/02/03/26-03/02/26 MICROSOFT 704.00 530 47299 9501 IT SOFTWARE SVC/02/03/26-03/02/26/MICROSOFT

36.00 530 47299 9501 IT SOFTWARE SVC/02/03/26-03/02/26/MICROSOFT

29.00 530 47299 9501 WIFI SOFTWARE SVC/03/05/26-04/05/26/UBIQUITI UNIFI 623.56 530 47299 9501 IT SOFTWARE SUBSCRIPTION/3/1-31/26/KASEYA

31.00 010 47299 1010 REC.BROCHURE PLATFORM/02/26-03/26/BENDING SPOONS

9.99 010 47299 1010 02/26 MARKETING/PROMO PHOTO PLATFORM/GOOGLE PHOTOS

16.99 010 41400 1012 02/26 MARKETING/PROMO PLATFORM/APPLE MUSIC

21.93 010 43100 1010 OFFICE SUPPLIES

7.72 010 43100 1010 OFFICE SUPPLIES
1111.76 010 43090 1010 MARKETING PROMOTIONAL LOBBY FRAMES(4),BRACKETS(4) -81.48 010 20300 SALES TAX:MRKT'G PROMO LOBBY FRAMES(4),BRACKETS(4) 124.72 010 43000 5000 SOCIAL MED.AD/01/16/26-2/16/26/CR&R TRASH CAN REPL

25.00 010 47299 1010 02/26 RECREATION BROCHURE SOFTWARE/DREAMSTIME.COM

29.99 010 47299 1010 2/26/26-3/25/26 RECREATION BROCHURE SOFTWARE/ADOBE

REPORT.: 04/20/26
RUN • 04/20/26
Run By.: Eligio Marquez
City of Bellflower
Cash Disbursement Report by Vendor
PAGE: 011
ID #: PYVP
CTL.: BEL
Invoice No
VENDOR.: IMP03 (U.S. BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS) ..Continue.. ---- WARRANT DISTRIBUTION
Number Date Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr Description
B260317H XXXXXX 03/17/26
540.00 010 47299 5000

15.00 010 47299 1010
175.00 010 41100 1010
122.24 010 43100 1010

22.73 010 43100 1010

22.00 010 41100 1000
124.76 010 41100 1000
151.03 010 41100 1000

22.00 010 41100 1000

20.57 010 41100 1000
3040.96 010 46200 5015

35.82 010 42540 5030

66.95 010 42540 5030

15.45 010 42540 5030
161.30 010 42540 5030

35.80 010 43100 5010
140.66 037 42550 2510

28.13 010 42540 5030
-114.25 037 42550 2510

43.81 010 41302 1012

31.98 010 42540 5030

9.99 010 42540 5030

89.98 010 43100 5012
1897.30 010 46200 5017
156.00 010 41302 1012

35.00 010 41100 5000

85.60 010 41302 1012
2961.25 010 41302 1012

11.04 010 43100 3100

56.90 010 46200 3000

99.40 125 46000 3910
124.25 010 46000 3900
296.49 010 43110 3900
219.66 010 46000 3900

88.38 010 43110 3100

72.46 010 46012 3900
176.78 010 46010 3900

31.48 010 46010 3900
130.00 010 46012 3900

57.73 010 46000 3900
295.90 010 46000 3900

30.27 010 43110 3100
116.55 011 53604 9000

60.15 011 53604 9000
902.82 010 41100 3000
3/01/26-4/1/26 STAFF SCHEDULING SOFTWARE/WHENIWORK
3/02/26-4/2/26 MARKETING/PROMO PLATFORM/LINKTREE

DRONE (UAG) GENERAL TEST

WEBCAM/HEADPHONES/OFFICE SUPPLIES/CARD READER

OFFICE SUPPLIES
02/17/26 COUNCIL MEETING/COFFEE
02/17/26 COUNCIL MEETING/REFRESHMENTS
03/02/2026 COUNCIL MEETING/BREAKFAST
03/02/2026 COUNCIL MEETING/COFFEE
03/02/2026 COUNCIL MEETING/REFRESHMENTS
PASSIVE SPEAKER (QTY 4)/LOUDSPEAKERS (QTY 4)

SPECIAL EVENT SUPPLIES/SENIOR PROGRAMS

SPECIAL EVENT SUPPLIES/SENIOR PROGRAMS

SPECIAL EVENT SUPPLIES/SENIOR PROGRAMS
PROGRAM SUPPLIES/SENIOR VALENTINE'S DAY/02/12/26

FACILITY MAINTENANCE/LINENS LAUNDERED

TEEN PROGRAM/CRAFT SUPPLIES
SENIOR PROGRAM/REFRESHMENTS/VALENTINE'S/02/12/26

CREDIT/TEEN PROGRAM/CRAFT SUPPLIES
SPECIAL EVENT SUPPLIES/ENVELOPES (QTY 100)
SENIOR PROGRAM/REFRESHMENTS/VALENTINE'S/02/12/26
2/12-3/12/26 SEN PROG/ACTIVITY PLATFORM/KARAFUN
ADAPTIVE REC/REFRESHMENTS/VALENTINES PARTY 2/13/26
CUSTOM CANOPY (QTY 2)/EURMAX CANOPY

SPECIAL EVENTS SUPPLIES/BRAVO SPNR PACKETS/POSTAGE
REG/2/26/26 CPRS RISING PROFESSION ALS

SPECIAL EVENTS SUPPLIES

BRAVO EVENT EQUIPMENT/DRAPING

PHONE CHARGER/ON-CALL TRUCK

IPHONE/IPAD CASES
PW SUPPLIES/HEAVY DUTY TREE TIES (QTY 4)
PW SUPPLIES/CAM LOCK/KEY LATCH (QTY 4)
UNIFORMS/(1) SWEATSHIRT/(11) ORANGE SHIRTS

PW SUPPLIES
UNIFORMS/HEAVY DUTY RAIN COATS (QTY 2)

PW SUPPLIES

PW SUPPLIES

PW SUPPLIES
WINDSCREENS CUT TO SIZE (QTY 2)

PW SUPPLIES

PW SUPPLIES

UNIFORMS/RAIN BOOTS

PW SUPPLIES

PW SUPPLIES
LODGING/2/24-27/26 LCC CONF.,MONTEREY

REPORT.: 04/20/26
RUN • 04/20/26
Run By.: Eligio Marquez
City of Bellflower
Cash Disbursement Report by Vendor
PAGE: 012
ID #: PYVP
CTL.: BEL
Invoice No
VENDOR.: IMP03 (U.S. BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS) ..Continue.. ---- WARRANT DISTRIBUTION
Number Date Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr Description
B260317H XXXXXX 03/17/26
323.75 010 43110 3900 UNIFORMS/SWEATSHIRT/PANTS (QTY 8) 156.20 011 53604 9000 PW SUPPLIES/OUTDOOR WALL WASHER LIGHTS (QTY 2) 312.40 011 53604 9000 PW SUPPLIES/OUTDOOR WALL WASHER LIGHTS (QTY 4)

41.68 010 43110 3900 PUBLIC WORKS SUPPLIES/SAFETY GOGGLES

12.59 011 53604 9000 PW SUPPLIES

40.47 011 53604 9000 PW SUPPLIES

22.08 010 46500 3900 SIDE MIRRORS/KUBOTAS

46.91 010 46501 3100 CHARGING FEE/DISPUTED (NOT CITY VEHICLE)

12.15 010 46501 3100 CHARGING FEE/P.S. VEHICLE #145
-206.64 010 43110 2000 CREDIT/BOOTS

25.91 010 43100 2000 OFFICE SUPPLIES

3.09 010 43440 8000 FINGERPRINT CHANNELING SERVICE/01/2026

72.30 010 43100 2000 OFFICE SUPPLIES
- 7.07 010 43100 4105 RETURN: OFFICE SUPPLIES
- 1.15 900 43100 4152 RETURN: OFFICE SUPPLIES

57.96 010 46501 3100 CHARGING FEE/CE VEHICLE #812

62.96 010 43100 2000 OFFICE SUPPLIES

21.01 010 43100 2000 OFFICE SUPPLIES
- 2.90 010 46501 3100 CREDIT/CHARGING FEE DISPUTE
-46.91 010 46501 3100 CREDIT/CHARGING FEE DISPUTE

59.66 010 43100 2000 OFFICE SUPPLIES

31.43 010 43100 2000 OFFICE SUPPLIES

12.28 010 46501 3100 CHARGING FEE/P.S. VEHICLE #145
253.05 010 46200 2000 FIELD EQUIPMENT/GAS POWERED CHAINSAW -23.93 010 43100 2000 CREDIT/OFFICE SUPPLIES
209.94 010 43100 2000 OFFICE SUPPLIES

15.98 010 43100 2000 OFFICE SUPPLIES
620.08 010 43100 4100 PLANNING SUPPLIES

74.80 010 43100 4100 PLANNING SUPPLIES
-625.00 010 41100 1030 CREDIT/REG PLAN'G COMMISSIONER CONE

17.67 010 43100 4100 PLANNING SUPPLIES

19.08 600 43100 4120 BUILDING SUPPLIES
198.90 010 43000 4100 PUBLIC HEARING SIGNS (QTY 2)

26.50 600 43100 4120 BUILDING SUPPLIES
198.37 010 43100 4100 PLANNING SUPPLIES

29.06 010 43100 5030 OFFICE SUPPLIES/OAK CENTER

9.44 010 43100 5030 OFFICE SUPPLIES/OAK CENTER
518.28 010 46200 5011 FIELD/GYM EQUIPMENT/CLEANING PAD,DUST PAN,(2)MOPS 122.67 010 41400 1012 SPECIAL EVENTS SUPPLIES
113.55 010 41400 1012 SPECIAL EVENTS SUPPLIES

94.98 900 43100 5022 OFFICE SUPPLIES/BVC

14.99 010 43100 5012 ADAPTIVE REC PROGRAM SUPPLIES/VALENTINES/02/13/26 138.86 010 43100 5012 ADAPTIVE REC PROGRAM SUPPLIES/VALENTINES/02/13/26

58.65 010 43100 5012 ADAPTIVE REC PROGRAM SUPPLIES/VALENTINES/02/13/26 637.72 010 42540 5030 SPECIAL EVENT SUPPLIES/SENIOR PROGRAMS

REPORT.: 04/20/26
RUN • 04/20/26
Run By.: Eligio Marquez
City of Bellflower
Cash Disbursement Report by Vendor
PAGE: 013
ID #: PYVP
CTL.: BEL
Invoice No
VENDOR.: IMP03 (U.S. BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS) ..Continue.. - --- WARRANT DISTRIBUTION
Number Date Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr Description
B260317H XXXXXX 03/17/26

22.17 010 41302 1012
713.82 010 46200 5000
340.00 010 41200 5000

42.79 010 41302 1012

54.04 010 41302 1012
114.25 037 42550 2510
185.58 010 43100 5030
-114.25 037 42550 2510
- 14.99 010 43100 5010

30.13 010 43100 5010
309.80 010 43100 5000
151.20 037 43100 2510

65.12 010 43100 5030

81.65 037 42550 2510

22.04 010 43100 5010
175.05 010 46200 5017

44.06 010 43100 5010
293.92 010 46200 5000
187.47 010 42540 5030
138.26 010 42540 5030

61.87 010 43100 5000

29.82 010 43100 5030
- 26.54 010 42540 5030
490.00 010 43020 8000
111.58 010 43100 5012
117.22 010 46200 5013
212.76 900 46200 5022
216.33 010 42540 5030

28.71 900 46200 5022

16.70 010 43100 5030

16.66 010 43100 5030

16.66 010 43100 5030

37.67 010 43100 5030

96.60 010 43100 5030

55.97 510 20800
- 55.97 510 35072
- 18.45 530 20300
Vendor's Total = 42052.44

SPECIAL EVENT SUPPLIES/BRAVO

OFFICE FURNISHINGS/ADJ DESK WITH FILE CABINET

CPRS MEMBERSHIP DUES

SPECIAL EVENT SUPPLIES/BRAVO

SPECIAL EVENT SUPPLIES/BRAVO

CRAFT SUPPLIES/TEEN PROGRAMS

OFFICE SUPPLIES/OAK CENTER

CREDIT/CRAFT SUPPLIES/TEEN PROGRAMS

CREDIT/OFFICE SUPPLIES/SIMMS PARK

OFFICE SUPPLIES/SIMMS PARK

IT SUPPLIES/CELL PHONE ACCESSORIES

OFFICE SUPPLES/BRIM

OFFICE SUPPLIES/OAK CENTER

CRAFT SUPPLIES/TEEN PROGRAMS

OFFICE SUPPLIES/SIMMS PARK

CANOPY COVERS/BRIM

OFFICE SUPPLIES/SIMMS PARK

OFFICE SUPPLIES

SPECIAL EVENT SUPPLIES/SENIOR PROGRAMS

SPECIAL EVENT SUPPLIES/SENIOR PROGRAMS

OFFICE SUPPLIES

OFFICE SUPPLIES/OAK CENTER

CREDIT/SPECIAL EVENT SUPPLIES/SENIOR PROGRAMS
REG/3/21-22/26 LIFEGUARD'G INST/LONG BEACH SPORTS

SUPPLIES
LOCKER BATTERIES (QTY 4),CPR TRAINING PRO SHIELDS

IPAD ACCESSORIES/BVC

SPECIAL EVENT SUPPLIES/SENIOR PROGRAMS

IPAD ACCESSORIES/BVC

OFFICE SUPPLIES/OAK CENTER

OFFICE SUPPLIES/OAK CENTER

OFFICE SUPPLIES/OAK CENTER

OFFICE SUPPLIES/OAK CENTER

OFFICE SUPPLIES/OAK CENTER

SBA REFRESHMENTS/BELLFLOWER ENTREPRENEURIAL ACADEMY

SBA REFRESHMENTS/BELLFLOWER ENTREPRENEURIAL ACADEMY
SALES TAX 2026:IT EQUIPMENT/MOUNT
Invoice No
VENDOR.: INK01 (INK HEAD PRINTS, LLC)
- --- WARRANT DISTRIBUTION
Number Date Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr Description
14312 XXXXXX 04/06/26 434.27 010 43110 5010 STAFF UNIFORMS/POLOS (QTY 18)

REPORT.: 04/20/26
RUN • 04/20/26
Run By.: Eligio Marquez
City of Bellflower
Cash Disbursement Report by Vendor
PAGE: 014
ID #: PYVP
CTL.: BEL
Invoice No
VENDOR.: INK01 (INK HEAD PRINTS, LLC) ..Continue..
- --- WARRANT DISTRIBUTION
Number Date Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr Description
14233 XXXXXX 04/16/26
14239 XXXXXX 04/16/26
Vendor's Total =
432.88
946.99
2490.06
4304.20
010 43100 1100
010 43100 1000
010 43110 5000
CITY OF BELLFLOWER SHIRTS/ADMINISTRATION (QTY 9)
CITY OF BELLFLOWER SHIRTS/CITY COUNCIL (QTY 16)
STAFF UNIFORMS/POLOS,JACKETS (QTY 57)
Invoice No
VENDOR.: INT15 (MIKE CABRERA CORPORATION)
- --- WARRANT DISTRIBUTION
Number Date Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr Description
NV0000559 XXXXXX 04/16/26 164.00 010 41302 1012 COLLAGE POSTER/2026 BRAVO (QTY 1) Vendor's Total = 164.00
VENDOR.: IRS02 (INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE)
- --- WARRANT DISTRIBUTION
Invoice No Number Date Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr Description 35353525H XXXXXX 04/08/26 620.00 010 23020 941:EMPLYRS OASDI - SETTLEMENT PAYMENT 145.00 010 23170 941:EMPLYRS MEDICARE - SETTLEMENT PAYMENT 1100.00 010 23070 941:EMPLYRS FEDERAL - SETTLEMENT PAYMENT 30264489H XXXXXX 04/09/26 551.56 010 23020 941:EMPLYRS QRTRLY OASDI- FINAL 129.00 010 23170 941:EMPLYRS QRTRLY MEDICARE- FINAL
680.52 010 23070 941:EMPLYRS QRTRLY FEDERAL- FINAL
75693226H XXXXXX 04/09/26 62668.32 010 23020 941:EMPLYRS QRTRLY OASDI PPE 4/3/26 PD 4/9/26 14782.46 010 23170 941:EMPLYRS QRTRLY MEDICARE PPE 4/3/26 PD 4/9/26 47010.49 010 23070 941:EMPLYRS QRTRLY FEDERAL PPE 4/3/26 PD 4/9/26 Vendor's Total = 127687.35
Invoice No
VENDOR.: JDL01 (JDL PACKAGING SYSTEMS, INC)
- --- WARRANT DISTRIBUTION
Number Date Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr Description
J73684 XXXXXX 04/16/26 796.48 010 43100 8000 COPY PAPER (QTY 16) 398.24 010 43100 5000 COPY PAPER (QTY 8)

REPORT.: 04/20/26
RUN • 04/20/26
Run By.: Eligio Marquez
City of Bellflower
Cash Disbursement Report by Vendor
PAGE: 015
ID #: PYVP
CTL.: BEL
Invoice No
J73684
VENDOR.: JDLO1 (JDL PACKAGING SYSTEMS, INC) ..Continue.. ---- WARRANT
Number Date
XXXXXX 04/16/26
Vendor's Total =
Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr
746.71 010 43100 2000
1941.43

DISTRIBUTION
Description
COPY PAPER (QTY 15)
Invoice No
1160593
- --- WARRANT
Number Date
XXXXXX 04/06/26
Vendor's Total =
VENDOR.: JHMO1 (JHM SUPPLY, INC.)

DISTRIBUTION
Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr Description
863.17 010 46300 3100
663.17

IRRIGATION SUPPLIES
Invoice No
123502
VENDOR.: JJP00 (JJ PROPERTY MAINTENANCE NETWORK, INC.)
- --- WARRANT
Number Date
XXXXXX 04/16/26
Vendor's Total =

DISTRIBUTION
Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr Description
2997.00
652.00
1269.00
924.00
114.58
1141.00
7097.58
010 46000 8000
010 46000 3100
010 46000 2000
010 46013 3900
010 46010 3900
010 46030 3900 ECF
03/26
03/26
03/26
03/26
03/26
03/26

JANITORIAL

JANITORIAL

JANITORIAL

JANITORIAL

JANITORIAL

JANITORIAL
SERVICE/AFN 1062
SERVICE/AFN 1062
SERVICE/AFN 1062
SERVICE/AFN 1062
SERVICE/AFN 1062
SERVICE/AFN 1062
Invoice No
001580785
- --- WARRANT
Number Date
XXXXXX 04/06/26
Vendor's Total =
VENDOR.: KIE03 (KIEFER AQUATICS)

DISTRIBUTION
Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr Description
119.34 010 46200 5013
119.34

FACILITIES SUPPLIES
Invoice No
- --- WARRANT
Number Date
B260326 XXXXXX 04/06/26
VENDOR.: KIN07 (KINGDOM CAUSES)
Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr
23918.57 974 44802 7322

DISTRIBUTION
Description
02/26 HOMELESS PREVENTION & RAPID REHOUSING

REPORT.: 04/20/26
RUN • 04/20/26
Run By.: Eligio Marquez
City of Bellflower
Cash Disbursement Report by Vendor
PAGE: 016
ID #: PYVP
CTL.: BEL
Invoice No
VENDOR.: KIN07 (KINGDOM CAUSES) ..Continue..
- --- WARRANT DISTRIBUTION
Number Date Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr Description
SIFEB2026 XXXXXX 04/08/26
SIJAN2026
XXXXXX 04/08/26
615.00 125 46000 3910
1070.00 010 46033 3900
2457.50 010 46026 3900
1012.50 100 46000 3560
290.00 010 46000 2000
1341.25 010 46000 3900
755.00 010 46010 3900
722.50 125 46000 3910
962.50 010 46033 3900
2726.25 010 46026 3900
1012.50 100 46000 3560
343.75 010 46000 2000
1663.75 010 46000 3900
647.50 010 46010 3900
Vendor's Total = 39538.57
02/26 ON -CALL LANDSCAPE SERVICES/AFN 464.4
02/26 ON -CALL LANDSCAPE SERVICES/AFN 464.4
02/26 ON -CALL LANDSCAPE SERVICES/AFN 464.4
02/26 ON -CALL LANDSCAPE SERVICES/AFN 464.4
02/26 ON -CALL LANDSCAPE SERVICES/AFN 464.4
02/26 ON -CALL LANDSCAPE SERVICES/AFN 464.4
02/26 ON -CALL LANDSCAPE SERVICES/AFN 464.4
01/26 ON -CALL LANDSCAPE SERVICES/AFN 464.4
01/26 ON -CALL LANDSCAPE SERVICES/AFN 464.4
01/26 ON -CALL LANDSCAPE SERVICES/AFN 464.4
01/26 ON -CALL LANDSCAPE SERVICES/AFN 464.4
01/26 ON -CALL LANDSCAPE SERVICES/AFN 464.4
01/26 ON -CALL LANDSCAPE SERVICES/AFN 464.4
01/26 ON -CALL LANDSCAPE SERVICES/AFN 464.4
Invoice No
VENDOR.: KTU01 (KTU+A )
- --- WARRANT DISTRIBUTION
Number Date Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr Description
38123 XXXXXX 04/06/26 774.00 010 42054 5000 02/26 GRANT RESEARCH AND UPDATES/AFN 781.3 TO#1 Vendor's Total = 774.00
Invoice No
VENDOR.: LAK03 (CITY OF LAKEWOOD)
- --- WARRANT DISTRIBUTION
Number Date Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr Description
6028 XXXXXX 04/17/26
68880.00
19200.00
1680.00
2400.00
Vendor's Total = 92160.00
010 42192 2230
100 42192 3560
125 42192 3910
010 42192 2230
02/26 SEC.PATROL SVCS/VARIOUS PUBLIC LOCATIONS
02/26 SECURITY PATROL SVCS/PARK'G STRUCTURE
02/26 SECURITY PATROL SVCS/BIKE TRAIL
02/26 SECURITY PATROL SVCS/SUPERVISOR
Invoice No
VENDOR.: LOS50 (LOS CERRITOS COMMUNITY NEWS)
- --- WARRANT DISTRIBUTION
Number Date Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr Description
38189 XXXXXX 04/16/26 467.70 010 43000 4000 LEGAL AD/2ND.PUB.NTC.9855 FLOWER SALE/03/13/26

REPORT.: 04/20/26
RUN • 04/20/26
Run By.: Eligio Marquez
City of Bellflower
Cash Disbursement Report by Vendor
PAGE: 017
ID #: PYVP
CTL.: BEL
Invoice No
VENDOR.: LOS50 (LOS CERRITOS COMMUNITY NEWS) ..Continue.. - --- WARRANT DISTRIBUTION
Number Date Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr Description
XXXXXX 04/16/26
38215 XXXXXX 04/16/26
569.04
428.73
522.27
514.47
428.72
Vendor's Total = 2930.93
010 43000 3000
900 43000 4150
010 43000 4000
010 43000 1200
910 43000 4210
LEGAL AD/PUB.NTC.BSMWC FRANCHISE AGRMT/03/13/26
LEGAL AD/DRAFT FY26/27 ANNUAL PLAN/PUB.3/27/26
LEGAL AD/PUB.NTC KOAM PHARMACY BAP/PUB.3/27/26
LEGAL AD/PUB.NTC.ORDINANCE #1453/PUB.3/27/26
LEGAL AD/DRAFT FY26/27 ANNUAL PLAN/PUB.3/27/26
Invoice No
RFY252609
VENDOR.: LOS52 (LOS ANGELES REGIONAL INTEROPERABLE)
---- WARRANT DISTRIBUTION
Number Date Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr Description
XXXXXX 04/07/26 320.00 010 46100 2000 03/26 SUBSCRIPTION/LA-RICS/AFN 1036 Vendor's Total = 320.00
Invoice No
VENDOR.: MEN06 (WILLIAM J MENDES)
- --- WARRANT DISTRIBUTION
Number Date Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr Description
B260406 XXXXXX 04/16/26 150.00 010 41000 1030 04/06/26 PLANNING COMMISSION STIPEND Vendor's Total = 150.00
VENDOR.: MER05 (MERCY HOUSE LIVING CENTERS)
- --- WARRANT DISTRIBUTION
Invoice No Number Date Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr Description 47002602 XXXXXX 04/06/26 129987.58 010 42054 8010 TSS 02/26 TEMPORARY SHELTER SERVICES/NEW HOPE/AFN 853 24097.35 030 42054 8010 TSS 02/26 TEMPORARY SHELTER SERVICES/NEW HOPE/AFN 853 Vendor's Total = 154084.93
Invoice No
VENDOR.: MIC11 (MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL, INC.)
---- WARRANT DISTRIBUTION
Number Date Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr Description
1278060 XXXXXX 04/16/26 870.00 320 42054 6022
1/26 ASSESSMENT/CP S/W CAPTURE SYSTEM/AFN 752.1

REPORT.: 04/20/26
RUN • 04/20/26
Run By.: Eligio Marquez
City of Bellflower
Cash Disbursement Report by Vendor
PAGE: 018
ID #: PYVP
CTL.: BEL
Invoice No
1282057
VENDOR.: MIC11 (MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL, INC.) ..Continue.. - --- WARRANT DISTRIBUTION
Number Date Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr Description
XXXXXX 04/16/26
18483.66
Vendor's Total = 19353.66
320 42054 6022 2/26 ASSESSMENT/CP S/W CAPTURE SYSTEM/AFN 752.1 Invoice No
VENDOR.: MIL10 (ROSS A. MILLER DBA MILLER SOUND)
- --- WARRANT DISTRIBUTION
Number Date Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr Description
3043 XXXXXX 04/06/26 3550.00 010 41302 1012 04/23/26 SPECIAL EVENT VIDEO EQUIPMENT,TECHNICIAN Vendor's Total = 3550.00
Invoice No
B260406
VENDOR.: MOT05 (MARIAH MARIE MOTT)
- --- WARRANT DISTRIBUTION
Number Date Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr Description
XXXXXX 04/16/26
150.00 010 41000 1030 04/06/26 PLANNING COMMISSION STIPEND Vendor's Total = 150.00
Invoice No
VENDOR.: MSA02 (MUNICIPAL DENTAL POOL)
---- WARRANT DISTRIBUTION
Number Date Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr Description
A260407H XXXXXX 04/08/26
8018.63 010 23120 DENTAL INS - 4/26

55.78 010 43514 3100 ADJ
Vendor's Total = 8074.41
Invoice No
VENDOR.: NAT43 (NATIONAL ORGANIZATION OF)
---- WARRANT DISTRIBUTION
Number Date Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr Description
B260324H XXXXXX 03/24/26 15000.00 010 41302 1012 FINAL BALANCE(50%)/2026 BRAVO SPEAKER/INV#9435 Vendor's Total = 15000.00

REPORT.: 04/20/26
RUN • 04/20/26
Run By.: Eligio Marquez
City of Bellflower
Cash Disbursement Report by Vendor
PAGE: 019
ID #: PYVP
CTL.: BEL
Invoice No
B260407
B260409
VENDOR.: NOR16 (BARBARA NORBUT)
---- WARRANT DISTRIBUTION
Number Date Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr Description
XXXXXX 04/16/26
XXXXXX 04/16/26
403.00 010 42534 5000 INSTRUCTOR FEE/VOLLEYBALL/3/9-30/26 828.75 010 42534 5000 INSTRUCTOR FEE/VOLLEYBALL CLINIC/4/6-9/26 Vendor's Total = 1231.75
Invoice No
501227
506903
VENDOR.: NV501 (NV5,INC.)
---- WARRANT DISTRIBUTION
Number Date Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr Description
XXXXXX 04/06/26
XXXXXX 04/06/26
37060.00
10712.50
Vendor's Total = 47772.50
145 47050 9000
145 47050 9000
108 1/26 ON -CALL CONST. MGMT./ALONDRA BLVD. RESURFACE
108 2/26 ON -CALL CONST. MGMT./ALONDRA BLVD. RESURFACE
Invoice No
13448
13487
VENDOR.: ONG01 (OSCAR NERI)
---- WARRANT DISTRIBUTION
Number Date Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr Description
XXXXXX 04/06/26
XXXXXX 04/16/26

66.30 010 43090 1010 POSTERS (QTY 4)

33.15 010 43100 1300 DOOR SIGN (QTY 1)
Vendor's Total = 99.45
Invoice No
PB17624
VENDOR.: PAC33 (PACKET FUSION, INC.)
---- WARRANT DISTRIBUTION
Number Date Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr Description
XXXXXX 04/06/26 53.70 530 43300 9501 1/25/26-2/24/26 ZOOM SUB.OVERAGE FEE/AFN 1088 Vendor's Total = 53.70
Invoice No
VENDOR.: PAL05 (PALMIERI, HENNESSEY & LEIFER, LLP ITF)
---- WARRANT DISTRIBUTION
Number Date Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr Description
B260406 XXXXXX 04/06/26 1175000.00 011 47970 9000 HOMELESS SHELTER ACQUIS/8833 CEDAR/APN#7162019061

REPORT.: 04/20/26
RUN • 04/20/26
Run By.: Eligio Marquez
City of Bellflower
Cash Disbursement Report by Vendor
PAGE: 020
ID #: PYVP
CTL.: BEL
Invoice No
VENDOR.: PAL05 (PALMIERI, HENNESSEY & LEIFER, LLP ITF) ..Continue.. ---- WARRANT DISTRIBUTION
Number Date Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr Description
B260406 XXXXXX 04/06/26 2000000.00
1950000.00
-1950000.00
Vendor's Total = 3175000.00
030 47970 9000
011 47970 9000
010 15000
HOMELESS SHELTER ACQUIS/8833 CEDAR/APN#7162019061
HOMELESS SHELTER ACQUIS/8833 CEDAR/APN#7162019061
HOMELESS SHELTER ACQUIS/8833 CEDAR/APN#7162019061
Invoice No
VENDOR.: PARO1 (LIBERTY UTILITIES/PARK WATER COMPANY)
---- WARRANT DISTRIBUTION
Number Date Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr Description
B260324H XXXXXX 03/24/26
B260325H XXXXXX 03/25/26
B260326H XXXXXX 03/26/26
B260331H XXXXXX 03/31/26
2768.57 010 43212 3100
6057.85 010 43212 3900
6693.09 010 43212 3900
4709.67 010 43212 3100
448.71 010 43212 3900
3187.78 010 43212 3100
Vendor's Total = 23865.67
01/28/26-02/25/26 WATER
01/28/26-02/25/26 WATER
01/29/26-02/25/26 WATER
12/30/25-03/02/26 WATER
12/30/25-03/02/26 WATER
12/31/25-03/04/26 WATER
Invoice No
VENDOR.: PERSO (PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM)
---- WARRANT DISTRIBUTION
Number Date Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr Description
A260406H XXXXXX 04/06/26
67645.08 010 23040 PERS RETIREMENT - PPE 4/3/26 PD 4/9/26

3.05 010 43524 4100 ADJ
Vendor's Total = 67648.13
Invoice No
VENDOR.: PML01 (P.M. LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES, LLC.)
---- WARRANT DISTRIBUTION
Number Date Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr Description
26003 XXXXXX 04/06/26 5000.00 010 42054 2000 03/26 CONSULTANT/PUBLIC SAFETY/AFN 1050 Vendor's Total = 5000.00

REPORT.: 04/20/26
RUN • 04/20/26
Run By.: Eligio Marquez
City of Bellflower
Cash Disbursement Report by Vendor
PAGE: 021
ID #: PYVP
CTL.: BEL
Invoice No
VENDOR.: POR00 (ALYSSA PORRAS/PETTY CASH CUSTODIAN)
---- WARRANT DISTRIBUTION
Number Date Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr Description
31800H XXXXXX 03/30/26

15.45 010 43100 1100 LYSOL DISINFECTANT SPRAY/OFFICE SUPPLY Vendor's Total = 15.45
Invoice No
VENDOR.: RES03 (RESOURCE BUILDING MATERIALS,INC.)
- --- WARRANT DISTRIBUTION
Number Date Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr Description
4175411 XXXXXX 04/16/26 799.25 010 20600 DOG PARK LANDSCAPE BOULDERS Vendor's Total = 799.25
Invoice No
268067
268068
VENDOR.: SCS02 (S.C. SIGNS & SUPPLIES LLC)
- --- WARRANT DISTRIBUTION
Number Date Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr Description
XXXXXX 04/06/26
XXXXXX 04/06/26
2274.09
154.70
Vendor's Total = 2428.79
010 43180 3100 REPLACEMENT STREET NAME SIGNS (QTY 21)
010 43180 3100 REPLACEMENT SIGNS (QTY 4)
Invoice No
VENDOR.: SHE10 (GAIL P SHEPPARD-CAPRIETTA)
- --- WARRANT DISTRIBUTION
Number Date Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr Description
B260323 XXXXXX 04/06/26 2511.60 010 42534 5000 INSTRUCTOR FEE/AQUA FIT/3/2-30/26 Vendor's Total = 2511.60

REPORT.: 04/20/26
RUN • 04/20/26
Run By.: Eligio Marquez
City of Bellflower
Cash Disbursement Report by Vendor
PAGE: 022
ID #: PYVP
CTL.: BEL
Invoice No
783811
- --- WARRANT
Number Date
XXXXXX 04/08/26
Vendor's Total =
VENDOR.: SMA01 (SMART AND FINAL)
Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr

70.45 010 41100 1100

70.45 DISTRIBUTION
Description
REFRESHMENTS/EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT EVENT 4/1/26
Invoice No
246866
670466
- --- WARRANT
Number Date
XXXXXX 04/16/26
XXXXXX 04/16/26
Vendor's Total =
VENDOR.: SMA02 (SMART & FINAL)
Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr
115.42 010 42534 5000

7.98 010 42540 5030
123.40

DISTRIBUTION
Description

REFRESHMENTS/DIVE-IN MOVIE

SENIOR PROGRAMMING SUPPLIES
Invoice No
875199
- --- WARRANT
Number Date
XXXXXX 04/16/26
Vendor's Total =
VENDOR.: SMA03 (SMART & FINAL)
Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr

99.16 010 42015 1350

99.16 DISTRIBUTION
Description
SUPPLIES/3/30/26 SPRING BEET LUNCHEON
---- WARRANT
Invoice No Number Date
B260323H XXXXXX 03/23/26
B260324H XXXXXX 03/24/26
260325ECFH XXXXXX 03/25/26
B260330H XXXXXX 03/30/26
VENDOR.: SOU01
(SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON)
Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr
61002.48
7342.30
119.10

97.42 3539.51
2279.79
5094.20
2188.93
1985.15
284.18

25.41 010
010
010
010
100
010
010
010
010
944
010
43210
43210
43210
43210
43210
43210
43210
43210
43210
43210
43210
3100
8000
3100
3900
3560
8010 TSS
3900 ECF
2000
3100
3410
3900

DISTRIBUTION
Description
02/26 ELECTRIC
02/26 ELECTRIC
2/26 ELECTRIC
2/26 ELECTRIC
2/26 ELECTRIC
2/26 ELECTRIC
02/26 ELECTRIC/THE MAYNE EVENTS CENTER
02/26 ELECTRIC
02/26 ELECTRIC
02/26 ELECTRIC
02/26 ELECTRIC

REPORT.: 04/20/26
RUN • 04/20/26
Run By.: Eligio Marquez
City of Bellflower
Cash Disbursement Report by Vendor
PAGE: 023
ID #: PYVP
CTL.: BEL
Invoice No
VENDOR.: SOU01 (SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON) ..Continue.. ---- WARRANT DISTRIBUTION
Number Date Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr Description
B260330H XXXXXX 03/30/26
425.97 320 43210 6022 02/26 ELECTRIC
Vendor's Total = 84384.44
Invoice No
VENDOR.: SOU03 (THE GAS COMPANY)
---- WARRANT DISTRIBUTION
Number Date Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr Description
B260324H XXXXXX 03/24/26
B260326H XXXXXX 03/26/26
260326ECFH XXXXXX 03/26/26
B260327H XXXXXX 04/02/26

19.43 010 43211 3100 02/26 GAS
4599.57 010 43211 3900 02/26 GAS
687.86 010 43211 8000 02/26 GAS
767.34 010 43211 3900 02/26 GAS
131.94 010 43211 2000 02/26 GAS
1598.60 010 43211 3900 ECF 02/26 GAS/THE MAYNE EVENTS CENTER 345.04 010 43211 8010 TSS 02/26 GAS
Vendor's Total = 8149.78
Invoice No
VENDOR.: SOU12 (SO.CA. MUNICIPAL ATHLETIC FEDERATION INC) ---- WARRANT DISTRIBUTION
Number Date Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr Description
B260406 XXXXXX 04/16/26 100.00 010 41200 5000 2026 SCMAF MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL Vendor's Total = 100.00
Invoice No
596209
701317457
VENDOR.: SOU29 (SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON)
---- WARRANT DISTRIBUTION
Number Date Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr Description
XXXXXX 04/07/26
XXXXXX 04/17/26
2072.80 010 43210 3100 NEW ELEC.METER,SVC/EXEC.TRACT/14112 1/4 LEAHY AVE 687.66 010 43410 3900 4/26/26-5/25/26 RENT/RIVERVIEW PARK/AFN 39.7 Vendor's Total = 2760.46

REPORT.: 04/20/26
RUN • 04/20/26
Run By.: Eligio Marquez
City of Bellflower
Cash Disbursement Report by Vendor
PAGE: 024
ID #: PYVP
CTL.: BEL
Invoice No
D00005170
---- WARRANT
Number Date
XXXXXX 04/16/26
Vendor's Total =
VENDOR.: STA04 (STATE CONTROLLER'S OFFICE)
Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr
3222.96 010 42054 1300
3222.96

DISTRIBUTION
Description
FY24/25 ANNUAL STREET REPORT PREPARATION
Invoice No
B260403
- --- WARRANT
Number Date
XXXXXX 04/06/26
Vendor's Total =
VENDOR.: STA15 (STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr
371.00 010 20230
371.00

DISTRIBUTION
Description
04/26 BACKUP WITHHOLDING/GAR06
Invoice No
- --- WARRANT
Number Date
056541937 XXXXXX
056541942 XXXXXX
056541943 XXXXXX
056541944 XXXXXX
056541946 XXXXXX
059127099 XXXXXX
059127101 XXXXXX
056541941 XXXXXX
059127104 XXXXXX
059127109 XXXXXX
04/06/26
04/06/26
04/06/26
04/06/26
04/06/26
04/06/26
04/06/26
04/16/26
04/16/26
04/16/26
Vendor's Total
VENDOR.: STA26 (STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAGE)

DISTRIBUTION
Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr Description

36.45 142.79
381.66

48.48 74.34

75.43 42.20
220.99
221.15
123.72
1367.21
010
010
010
010
010
010
010
010
010
010
43100
43100
43100
43100
43100
43100
43100
43100
43100
43100
1300
2000
2000
2000
4000
1200
1300
3000
3000
3000
OFFICE
OFFICE
OFFICE
OFFICE
OFFICE
OFFICE
OFFICE
OFFICE
OFFICE
OFFICE

SUPPLIES

SUPPLIES

SUPPLIES

SUPPLIES

SUPPLIES

SUPPLIES

SUPPLIES

SUPPLIES/CHAIR

SUPPLIES

SUPPLIES
Invoice No
B260319
---- WARRANT
Number Date
XXXXXX 04/06/26
Vendor's Total =
VENDOR.: STA52 (STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY)
Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr

86.40 010 42010 1350

86.40 DISTRIBUTION
Description
04/26 EMPLOYEE ASST.PROG/PART TIMERS/#003590100003

REPORT.: 04/20/26
RUN • 04/20/26
Run By.: Eligio Marquez
City of Bellflower
Cash Disbursement Report by Vendor
PAGE: 025
ID #: PYVP
CTL.: BEL
Invoice No
VENDOR.: TAY06 (TAYLOR'S LOCK & KEY)
---- WARRANT DISTRIBUTION
Number Date Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr Description
7901 XXXXXX 04/16/26 2714.06 010 46000 3900 SUPPLIES/CITY PADLOCKS Vendor's Total = 2714.06
Invoice No
301022126
301032126
801032126
VENDOR.: TIM04 (CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS)
---- WARRANT DISTRIBUTION
Number Date Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr Description
XXXXXX 04/06/26
XXXXXX 04/06/26
XXXXXX 04/06/26
179.98
179.98
959.94
Vendor's Total = 1319.90
135 43300 3610
135 43300 3610
135 43300 3610
03/26 INTERNET SERVICE/THOMPSON PARK
04/26 INTERNET SVC/THOMPSON PARK
2/21/26-4/20/26 INTERNET SVC/CP,SP,CITY HALL
Invoice No
VENDOR.: TPX01 (U.S. TELEPACIFIC CORPORATION)
---- WARRANT DISTRIBUTION
Number Date Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr Description
B260323H XXXXXX 03/23/26
406.03
203.01
203.01
604.20
611.28
249.61
249.61
389.41
382.92
382.92
Vendor's Total = 3682.00
010 43300 5012
010 43300 5011
010 43300 5013
010 43300 8000
135 43300 3610
010 43300 5000
010 43300 5010
010 43300 2000
010 43300 3100
010 43300 3900
03/09/26-04/08/26 TELECOM/CARUTHERS PARK
03/09/26-04/08/26 TELECOM/THOMPSON PARK
03/09/26-04/08/26 TELECOM/AQUATIC CENTER
03/09/26-04/08/26 TELECOM/CITY HALL
03/09/26-04/08/26 TELECOM/INTERNET/CITY HALL
03/09/26-04/08/26 TELECOM/SIMMS PARK
03/09/26-04/08/26 TELECOM/SIMMS PARK
03/09/26-04/08/26 TELECOM/SUBSTATION
03/09/26-04/08/26 TELECOM/PUBLIC WORKS
03/09/26-04/08/26 TELECOM/PUBLIC WORKS
Invoice No
VENDOR.: UNI39 (UNIDOS MASTERS SWIM TEAM)
---- WARRANT DISTRIBUTION
Number Date Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr Description
B260328 XXXXXX 04/06/26 546.00 010 42534 5000
Vendor's Total = 546.00
INSTRUCTOR FEE/SWIM/03/2-30/26

REPORT.: 04/20/26
RUN • 04/20/26
Run By.: Eligio Marquez
City of Bellflower
Cash Disbursement Report by Vendor
PAGE: 026
ID #: PYVP
CTL.: BEL
Invoice No
VENDOR.: VER09 (VERIZON WIRELESS)
---- WARRANT DISTRIBUTION
Number Date Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr Description
137614110H XXXXXX 03/24/26

40.01 530 43300 9500 03/26 CELLULAR BROADBAND

38.37 010 43300 1000 CVS 03/26 CELLULAR BROADBAND

38.37 010 43300 3000 03/26 CELLULAR BROADBAND
256.92 010 43300 3100 03/26 CELLULAR BROADBAND
118.45 010 43300 3900 03/26 CELLULAR BROADBAND
115.11 010 43300 4000 03/26 CELLULAR BROADBAND

38.37 010 43300 4100 03/26 CELLULAR BROADBAND
218.08 010 43300 4105 03/26 CELLULAR BROADBAND

35.50 900 43300 4152 03/26 CELLULAR BROADBAND
323.60 010 43300 2000 03/26 CELLULAR BROADBAND

72.00 010 46200 5000 03/26 CELLULAR BROADBAND

72.00 010 46200 5010 03/26 CELLULAR BROADBAND

72.00 010 46200 5011 03/26 CELLULAR BROADBAND
256.49 010 46200 5030 03/26 CELLULAR BROADBAND
116.75 010 43300 1100 03/26 CELLULAR BROADBAND

38.37 010 43300 5013 03/26 CELLULAR BROADBAND
128.49 010 43300 5000 03/26 CELLULAR BROADBAND
150.12 010 43300 5010 03/26 CELLULAR BROADBAND

70.10 010 43300 5011 03/26 CELLULAR BROADBAND

38.37 010 43300 5012 03/26 CELLULAR BROADBAND

38.37 010 43300 5017 03/26 CELLULAR BROADBAND

28.61 010 43300 5030 03/26 CELLULAR BROADBAND

38.01 320 43300 6022 03/26 CELLULAR BROADBAND

40.01 135 43300 3610 03/26 CELLULAR BROADBAND

78.41 900 43300 5022 03/26 CELLULAR BROADBAND
Vendor's Total = 2460.88
Invoice No
VENDOR.: VOY01 (VOYAGER FLEET SYSTEMS INC)
---- WARRANT DISTRIBUTION
Number Date Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr Description
778672609 XXXXXX 04/17/26 12090.87 010 46501 3100 2/26 FUEL,CNG,DIESEL/VARIOUS EQUIPMENT Vendor's Total = 12090.87
Invoice No
VENDOR.: VOY02 (VOYA RETIREMENT INS & ANNUITY CO - 457) ---- WARRANT DISTRIBUTION
Number Date Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr Description
A260403H XXXXXX 04/09/26 32464.15 010 23090 457 DEFERRED COMP - PPE 4/3/26 PD 4/9/26

REPORT.: 04/20/26
RUN • 04/20/26
Run By.: Eligio Marquez
City of Bellflower
Cash Disbursement Report by Vendor
PAGE: 027
ID #: PYVP
CTL.: BEL
Invoice No
VENDOR.: VOY02 (VOYA RETIREMENT INS & ANNUITY CO - 457) ..Continue.. - --- WARRANT DISTRIBUTION
Number Date Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr Description
A260408H XXXXXX 04/09/26
135.86 010 23090 VOYA 457- FINAL DEFERRED COMP
Vendor's Total = 32600.01
Invoice No
VENDOR.: VOY03 (VOYA RETIREMENT INS & ANNUITY CO - 401a) - --- WARRANT DISTRIBUTION
Number Date Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr Description
A260403H XXXXXX 04/09/26
704.05 010 23092 401A DEFERRED COMP - PPE 4/3/26 PD 4/9/26 Vendor's Total = 704.05
Invoice No
VENDOR.: VOY04 (VOYA RETIREMENT INS & ANNUITY - 457 ROTH) - --- WARRANT DISTRIBUTION
Number Date Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr Description
A260403H XXXXXX 04/09/26 5503.45 010 23093 VOYA ROTH - PPE 4/3/26 PD 4/9/26 Vendor's Total = 5503.45
Invoice No
00631916
00631923
VENDOR.: WIL01 (WILLDAN ENGINEERING)
---- WARRANT DISTRIBUTION
Number Date Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr Description
XXXXXX 04/06/26
XXXXXX 04/06/26
11329.50
526.00
Vendor's Total = 11855.50
010 42054 3000
011 52604 9000 02/26 ON -CALL DESIGN SVCS/BAC OUTDOOR RESTROOMS 2/26 ON -CALL TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SERVICES
Invoice No
B260331
VENDOR.: WIL25 (ROBERT WILSON)
---- WARRANT DISTRIBUTION
Number Date Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr Description
XXXXXX 04/16/26

52.40 010 41100 1030 MILEAGE,PARKING/3/12/26 PLAN'G ACADEMY

REPORT.: 04/20/26
RUN • 04/20/26
Run By.: Eligio Marquez
City of Bellflower
Cash Disbursement Report by Vendor
PAGE: 028
ID #: PYVP
CTL.: BEL
Invoice No
B260406
---- WARRANT
Number Date
XXXXXX 04/16/26
Vendor's Total =
VENDOR.: WIL25 (ROBERT WILSON) ..Continue..

DISTRIBUTION
Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr Description
150.00 010 41000 1030
202.40
04/06/26 PLANNING COMMISSION STIPEND
Invoice No
13426
13427
13428
---- WARRANT
Number Date
XXXXXX
XXXXXX
XXXXXX
04/16/26
04/16/26
04/16/26
VENDOR.: WIN05 (WINNER CHEVROLET INC.)

DISTRIBUTION
Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr Description
44136.93
44136.93
44136.93
Vendor's Total = 132410.79
530 18400
530 18400
530 18400
2026 SILVERADO REG CAB/#6TG246748/TAG#2303/D.3900
2026 SILVERADO REG CAB/#4TG248711/TAG#2304/D.3900
2026 SILVERADO REG CAB/#1TG249010/TAG#2305/D.3900
Invoice No
B260328
VENDOR.: YOO03 (YOUNG REMBRANDTS NORTH ORANGE COUNTY)
---- WARRANT
Number Date
XXXXXX 04/08/26
Vendor's Total =

DISTRIBUTION
Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr Description
468.00 010 42534 5000
468.00
INSTRUCTOR FEES/CREATIVE DRAWING/2/21/26-3/28/26
Invoice No
B260324
B260331
---- WARRANT
Number Date
XXXXXX 04/06/26
XXXXXX 04/08/26
Vendor's Total =
VENDOR.: \AN35 (BELIA V. ANDALON)

DISTRIBUTION
Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr Description
136.50 010 42534 5000
561.60 010 42534 5000
698.10
INSTRUCTOR FEE/SPRING PAINT NIGHT/3/13/26
INSTRUCTOR FEES/PAINTING/2/17/26-3/31/26
Invoice No
B260330
---- WARRANT
Number Date
XXXXXX 04/08/26
Vendor's Total =
VENDOR.: \BAZO (ANGEL BAZAN)

DISTRIBUTION
Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr Description
500.00 010 41302 1012
500.00
STUDENT ESSAY WINNER/2026 BRAVO AWARDS

REPORT.: 04/20/26
RUN • 04/20/26
Run By.: Eligio Marquez
City of Bellflower
Cash Disbursement Report by Vendor
PAGE: 029
ID #: PYVP
CTL.: BEL
Invoice No
VENDOR.: \BE04 (BELLFLOWER HIGH SCHOOL)
---- WARRANT DISTRIBUTION
Number Date Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr Description
B260330 XXXXXX 04/06/26
200.00 010 41302 1012 04/23/26 BRAVO ENTERTAINMENT STIPEND Vendor's Total = 200.00
Invoice No
VENDOR.: \BMW1 (BMW MANAGEMENT, INC.)
- --- WARRANT DISTRIBUTION
Number Date Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr Description
77232 XXXXXX 04/08/26 9000.00 090 20506 REFUND DEPOSIT/PW/C&D WMP/10153 ARTESIA/R#77232 Vendor's Total = 9000.00
Invoice No
VENDOR.: \BRE1 (GUY BREMER)
- --- WARRANT DISTRIBUTION
Number Date Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr Description
B260331 XXXXXX 04/16/26
B260406 XXXXXX 04/16/26
105.10 010 41100 1030 MILEAGE,PARK'G/3/11-12/26 PLAN' ACADEMY 150.00 010 41000 1030 04/06/26 PLANNING COMMISSION STIPEND Vendor's Total = 255.10
Invoice No
VENDOR.: \BRE2 (ALMA BRETADO)
- --- WARRANT DISTRIBUTION
Number Date Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr Description
15291 XXXXXX 04/16/26 150.00 010 20500 REFUND DEPOSIT/P&R/R#15291 Vendor's Total = 150.00
Invoice No
B260403
VENDOR.: \BUB0 (BUBBLEMANIA AND COMPANY LA LLC)
---- WARRANT DISTRIBUTION
Number Date Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr Description
XXXXXX 04/08/26 340.00 010 42520 5000 4/25/26 EARTH DAY ENTERTAINMENT/BUBBLE SHOW Vendor's Total = 340.00

REPORT.: 04/20/26
RUN • 04/20/26
Run By.: Eligio Marquez
City of Bellflower
Cash Disbursement Report by Vendor
PAGE: 030
ID #: PYVP
CTL.: BEL
Invoice No
VENDOR.: \CAN2 (GARY CICHON)
- --- WARRANT DISTRIBUTION
Number Date Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr Description
B260330 XXXXXX 04/08/26 3500.00 010 41302 1012 04/23/26 EMCEE/2026 BRAVO AWARDS Vendor's Total = 3500.00
Invoice No
VENDOR.: \HEL2 (HELLENIC LIBRARY)
- --- WARRANT DISTRIBUTION
Number Date Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr Description
17177 XXXXXX 04/16/26 500.00 010 20500 REFUND DEPOSIT/P&R/R#17177 Vendor's Total = 500.00
Invoice No
VENDOR.: \JMAO (JMA PATIO & CONSTRUCTION INC.)
- --- WARRANT DISTRIBUTION
Number Date Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr Description
30576u XXXXXX 04/16/26
-154.50
-18.55
- 6.18
-1.04
- 1.00
Vendor's Total = -181.27
600 31600
542 36002
540 36004
600 31650
600 31652
Ck# 131742 Reversed
Ck# 131742 Reversed
Ck# 131742 Reversed
Ck# 131742 Reversed
Ck# 131742 Reversed
Invoice No
VENDOR.: \LEY4 (CLEMENTE FRAUSTO LEYVA)
- --- WARRANT DISTRIBUTION
Number Date Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr Description
B260328 XXXXXX 04/08/26 1032.00 010 42534 5000 INSTRUCTOR FEE/TENNIS/2/21/26-03/30/26 Vendor's Total = 1032.00
Invoice No
VENDOR.: \LIM7
(LIMITED EDITION CO)
- --- WARRANT DISTRIBUTION
Number Date Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr Description
17180 XXXXXX 04/16/26 500.00 010 20500 REFUND DEPOSIT/P&R/R#17180

REPORT.: 04/20/26
RUN • 04/20/26
Run By.: Eligio Marquez
City of Bellflower
Cash Disbursement Report by Vendor
PAGE: 031
ID #: PYVP
CTL.: BEL
Invoice No
VENDOR.: \LIM7 (LIMITED EDITION CO) ..Continue..
- --- WARRANT DISTRIBUTION
Number Date Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr Description
17335 XXXXXX 04/16/26 500.00 010 36630 REFUND PARTIAL RENTAL FEES/P&R/R#17335 Vendor's Total = 1000.00
Invoice No
VENDOR.: \MI04 (CONNIE MIRELES)
- --- WARRANT DISTRIBUTION
Number Date Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr Description
15292 XXXXXX 04/16/26 150.00 010 20500
Vendor's Total = 150.00
REFUND DEPOSIT/P&R/R#15292
Invoice No
VENDOR.: \PE20 (ANDRE PENA)
- --- WARRANT DISTRIBUTION
Number Date Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr Description
B260330 XXXXXX 04/08/26 500.00 010 41302 1012 STUDENT ESSAY WINNER/2026 BRAVO AWARDS Vendor's Total = 500.00
Invoice No
VENDOR.: \SHOE (SUSAN SHELTON)
- --- WARRANT DISTRIBUTION
Number Date Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr Description
B260324 XXXXXX 04/06/26 50.00 010 36650 REFUND CLASS/CANCELLED/YOGA/R#1021051.002 Vendor's Total = 50.00
Invoice No
VENDOR.: \SI06 (SHELLYANN B. SILVA)
---- WARRANT DISTRIBUTION
Number Date Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr Description
B260401 XXXXXX 04/08/26 525.00 010 42520 5000 4/25/26 EARTH DAY SPECIAL EVENT/FACEPAINT

REPORT.: 04/20/26
RUN • 04/20/26
Run By.: Eligio Marquez
City of Bellflower
Cash Disbursement Report by Vendor
PAGE: 032
ID #: PYVP
CTL.: BEL
Invoice No
VENDOR.: \SI06 (SHELLYANN B. SILVA) ..Continue..
- --- WARRANT DISTRIBUTION
Number Date Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr Description
B260409 XXXXXX 04/16/26 350.00 010 41400 1012 05/2/26 FACE PAINTING/STUDENT ART FESTIVAL Vendor's Total = 875.00
Invoice No
B260406
VENDOR.: \SOR1 (SOROPTIMIST INT'L OF BELLFLOWER)
- --- WARRANT DISTRIBUTION
Number Date Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr Description
XXXXXX 04/08/26 25.00 010 41100 1000 CSS 03/23/26 SOROPTIMIST LUNCHEON

25.00 010 41100 1000 CKD 03/23/26 SOROPTIMIST LUNCHEON
Vendor's Total = 50.00
Invoice No
B260409
VENDOR.: \ST17 (APRIL STRONG)
- --- WARRANT DISTRIBUTION
Number Date Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr Description
XXXXXX 04/16/26 360.00 010 41400 1012 5/2/26 BALLOON ARTIST/STUDENT ART FESTIVAL Vendor's Total = 360.00
Invoice No
VENDOR.: \TAC0 (TACOS GIYO, INC.)
- --- WARRANT DISTRIBUTION
Number Date Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr Description
26744 XXXXXX 04/16/26 7835.52 090 20506 REFUNDABLE DEPOSIT/PW/C&D WMP/10308 BEACH/R#26744 Vendor's Total = 7835.52
Invoice No
VENDOR.: \TH09 (ADRIANA THOMAS)
---- WARRANT DISTRIBUTION
Number Date Amount Paid G/L Account No Ctr Description
15290 XXXXXX 04/16/26 150.00 010 20500 REFUN❑ ❑EPOSIT/P&R/R#15290 Vendor's Total = 150.00
Report's Grand Total = 4895786.97

GZ�YoELLFLO
CR
OWING, TOGE8��
staffIeport
15-B
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
ATTENTION: Ryan Smoot, City Manager
FROM: Anna Garan, Director of Finance
SUBJECT: Consideration and possible action to receive and file the Investments Report for the month of March 2026.

DATE: April 27, 2026

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Investment Policy requires the Director of Finance to provide the City Council with a monthly investments report that contains certain required information pursuant to Government Code Section 53646. The report also includes additional financial information pursuant to BMC Subsection 2.12.030.B.5, which requires the submission of monthly financial statements of the City's receipts and disbursements to the City Council and City Manager. Furthermore, the investments report contains revenue and expenditure details on the development impact fees (Park Facilities, Public Facilities, Transportation Facilities, and Public Safety Facilities) and Public Arts Fees for fiscal years 2024-25 and 2025-26.

RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL
1) Receive and file the Investments Report; or
2) Alternatively, discuss and take other action related to this item.

FISCAL IMPACT
None

ATTACHMENT
Investments Report for the Month of March 2026 2
https://bellflowergcc.sharepoint.com/sites/fin/Shared Documents/AA/Treasurer's Reports/Staff Report for TR.docx 1 CITY OF BELLFLOWER AND BELLFLOWER SUCCESSOR AGENCY
INVESTMENTS REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF MARCH 2026

CASH AND INVESTMENT BALANCES BY FUND
(As of April 16, 2026)
NOTE: Figures with parentheses indicate negative amounts.

Beginning
Balance/
(Deficit)
Revenues
and Other
Deposits
Expenditures
and Other
Disbursements
Ending
Balance/
(Deficit)
CITY OF BELLFLOWER:

UNRESTRICTED:
010 General Fund $ 53,434,183
011 General Fund Capital Projects 23,314,736
012 Public Projects 7,608,740
999 Cash Clearing Unallocated Interest 413,369
RESTRICTED:

Development Impact/Other Fees (revenue/expenditure details attached) 024 Park Facilities 1,515,873
022 Public Facilities 56,644
026 Public Safety Facilities 14,507
028 Transportation Facilities 252,279
020 Public Arts (90,538)
Other Funds/Funding
013 DOT Highway Relinquishment 3,702,159
015 Transportation Development Act (TDA) Article 3 (69,000) 030 Grant Projects (3,068,871)
037 Drug Rehabilitation Program 273,519
040 Public Educational Government (PEG) 1,058,435
050 California COPS 471,565
070 Measure A Fund (1,114,869)
090 Agency Fund/Refundable Deposits -Private Projects 2,142,465 100 Proposition A - Transportation 2,444,058
115 Measure M - Streets 3,162,156
125 Measure R - Streets 1,608,106
135 Proposition C - Streets 2,885,506
140 State Gas Tax - Streets 7,400,065
145 Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA) 10,746,546 150 Air Quality Management District Fees 203,331
230 Sewer Reconstruction 309,575
320 Measure W 7,188,827
400 Section 115 OPEB Trust Fund 11,310,526
010 Section 115 Pension Stabilization Trust Fund (General Fund) 2,664,123 510 Economic Development 3,378,242
530 IT & Equipment Replacement 1,772,306
540 GIS Update 309,891
542 General Planning and Zoning Update 1,054,943
600 Building and Safety 97,591
602 Accessibility Compliance Fund 140,961
700 Debt Service - Public Facilities Corporation
710 Debt Service - Financing Authority (22,738)
720 Debt Service - 2021 Transportation COPS 1,348
730 Debt Service - 2021 Pension Obligation Bonds 255
900 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) (183,780)
910 HOME Investment Partnership (153,421)
944 Parking District No. 1 1,743
Successor Housing Agency:
974 Low and Moderate Income Housing Asset Fund 783,706

TOTAL CITY OF BELLFLOWER
SUCCESSOR AGENCY:

RESTRICTED:
956 Successor Agency BUSD Trust
970 Redevelopment Obligation Retirement Fund
972 Successor Agency Administration Fund

TOTAL SUCCESSOR AGENCY

COMBINED TOTAL - CITY & SUCCESSOR AGENCY
2,204,845 $ (3,239,452) $ 52,399,576
(3,565) 23,311,171
25,190 (999,663) 6,634,267
213,877 627,246
15,606 1,531,479
1,194 57,838
97 14,604
3,556 255,835
(90,538)
3,702,159
(69,000)
2,546,739 (175,723) (697,855)
(456) 273,063
1,192 - 1,059,627
9,479 (1,187) 479,857
923,048 (26,013) (217,834)
112,964 (194,072) 2,061,357
152,119 (307,964) 2,288,213
265,883 (13,393) 3,414,646
235,159 (51,203) 1,792,062
127,537 (79,594) 2,933,449
171,229 (108,007) 7,463,287
166,392 (1,239,871) 9,673,067
203,331
309,575
(80,774) 7,108,053
29,572 - 11,340,098
7,150 2,671,273
8,718 (44,941) 3,342,019
(135,863) 1,636,443
2,040 311,931
6,617 1,061,560
138,086 (136,196) 99,481
1,564 142,525
6,093 (16,645)
59,660 61,008
15 270
330 (26,407) (209,857)
86,770 (57,645) (124,296)
35 (2,953) (1,175)
(33,014) 750,692
$ 147,019,062 7,522,756 $ (6,957,956) $ 147,583,862
$ 317,008
52,162
6,656
$ 375,826
1,012 $
65 318,020
48,777
4,945
1,077 $
(5,161) $ 371,742
$ 147,394,888
7,523,833 $ (6,963,117) $ 147,955,604
https://bellflowergcc.sharepoint.com/sites/fin/Shared Documents/AA/Treasurer's Reports/TR 25-26/TR 26-03 2

DEVELOPMENT IMPACT/OTHER FEES
Revenue and Expenditure Detail Report
(July 1, 2025 - March 31, 2026)

PARK FACILITIES FEES
Revenues:
$ 17,415.00
39,858.36
8,615.52
27,792.00
53,754.36
15,563.52
22,291.20
15,983.10
101,626.08
18,808.20
19,350.00
15,605.77
356,663.11
July 11, 2025
September 2, 2025
September 15, 2025
October 27, 2025
November 6, 2025
December 8, 2025
December 17, 2025
January 12, 2026
January 27, 2026
February 3, 2026
February 4, 2026
March 30, 2026
Project Expenditures:
$ 1,451.70
S 1,451.70

PUBLIC FACILITIES FEES
Revenues:
$ 1,332.00
3,028.96
654.72
2,112.00
4,084.96
1,182.72
1,704.96
1,222.48
7,722.88
1,438.56
1,480.00
1,193.62
27,157.86
July 11, 2025
September 2, 2025
September 15, 2025
October 27, 2025
November 6, 2025
December 8, 2025
December 17, 2025
January 12, 2026
January 27, 2026
February 3, 2026
February 4, 2026
March 30, 2026
Project Expenditures:

PUBLIC ARTS FEES
Revenues:
$ 4,000.00 January 27, 2026
$ 4,000.00
Project Expenditures:

Park Fac Fee/9324 Heiner St
Park Fac Fee/9252 Maple St
Park Fac Fee/10626 Felson St
Park Fac Fee/8560 Ramona St
Park Fac Fee/9620 Belmont St
Park Fac Fee/9845 Liggett St
Park Fac Fee/13708 Cowley Ave
Park Fac Fee/9752 Glandon St
Park Fac Fee/17057 Bellflower Blvd
Park Fac Fee/9926 Potter Street
Park Fac Fee/13836 Cornuta Ave
Park Fac Fee/9721 Laurel St
Constitution Park Improvements
Public Fac Fee/9324 Heiner St
Public Fac Fee/9252 Maple St
Public Fac Fee/10626 Felson St
Public Fac Fee/8560 Ramona St
Public Fac Fee/9620 Belmont St
Public Fac Fee/9845 Liggett St
Public Fac Fee/13708 Cowley Ave
Public Fac Fee/9752 Glandon St
Public Fac Fee/17057 Bellflower Blvd
Public Fac Fee/9926 Potter Street
Public Fac Fee/13836 Cornuta Ave
Public Fac Fee/9721 Laurel St
Public Arts Fee/17057 Bellflower Blvd
https://bellflowergcc.sharepoint.com/sites/fin/Shared Documents/AA/Treasurer's Reports/TR 25-26/TR 26-(T3 3

DEVELOPMENT IMPACT/OTHER FEES
Revenue and Expenditure Detail Report
(July 1, 2025 - March 31, 2026)

PUBLIC SAFETY FACILITIES FEES
Revenues:
108.00
240.94

52.08 168.00
324.94

94.08 138.24

99.12 614.32
116.64
120.00

96.78 $ 2,173.14
July 11, 2025
September 2, 2025
September 15, 2025
October 27, 2025
November 6, 2025
December 8, 2025
December 17, 2025
January 12, 2026
January 27, 2026
February 3, 2026
February 4, 2026
March 30, 2026
Pro'ect Expenditures:

TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES FEES
Revenues:
$ 3,969.00
6,092.34
1,316.88
4,248.00
8,216.34
2,378.88
5,080.32
3,642.66
15,533.52
4,286.52
4,410.00
3,556.67
$ 62,731.13
July 11, 2025
September 2, 2025
September 15, 2025
October 27, 2025
November 6, 2025
December 8, 2025
December 17, 2025
January 12, 2026
January 27, 2026
February 3, 2026
February 4, 2026
March 30, 2026
Pro'ect Expenditures:

Public Safety Fac Fee/9324 Heiner St
Public Safety Fac Fee/9252 Maple St
Public Safety Fac Fee/10626 Felson St
Public Safety Fac Fee/8560 Ramona St
Public Safety Fac Fee/9620 Belmont St
Public Safety Fac Fee/9845 Liggett St
Public Safety Fac Fee/13708 Cowley Ave
Public Safety Fee/9752 Glandon St
Public Safety Fee/17057 Bellflower Blvd
Public Safety Fee/9926 Potter Street
Public Safety Fee/13836 Cornuta Ave
Public Safety Fee/9721 Laurel St
Transportation
Transportation
Transportation
Transportation
Transportation
Transportation
Transportation
Transportation
Transportation
Transportation
Transportation
Transportation
Fac Fee/9324 Heiner St
Fac Fee/9252 Maple St
Fac Fee/10626 Felson St
Fac Fee/8560 Ramona St
Fac Fee/9620 Belmont St
Fac Fee/9845 Liggett St
Fac Fee/13708 Cowley Ave
Fee/9752 Glandon St
Fee/17057 Bellflower Blvd
Fee/9926 Potter Street
Fee/13836 Cornuta Ave
Fee/9721 Laurel St
https://bellflowergcc.sharepoint.com/sites/fin/Shared Documents/AA/Treasurer's Reports/TR 25-26/TR 26-034

DEVELOPMENT IMPACT/OTHER FEES
Revenue and Expenditure Detail Report
(July 1, 2024 - June 30, 2025)

PARK FACILITIES FEES
Revenues:
$ 18,288.00
20,605.60
7,000.00
20,605.60
45,440.64
20,622.80
36,576.00
18,920.00
7,176.45
37,926.00
20,640.00
30,043.86
87,943.60
4,454.80
$ 376,243.35
July 15, 2024
July 22, 2024
August 28, 2024
October 23, 2024
November 7, 2024
December 18, 2024
January 23, 2025
January 27, 2025
March 4, 2025
March 17, 2025
March 20, 2025
April 18, 2025
April 30, 2025
May 19, 2025
Pro'ect Expenditures:
$ 16,800.00
15,510.29
3,802.50
117,575.86
$ 153,688.65

PUBLIC FACILITIES FEES
Revenues:
$ 1,185.00
3,277.80
1,569.38
1,569.38
3,466.56
1,570.69
2,370.00
1,441.00
1,335.15
2,888.55
1,572.00
6,698.03
339.29
29,282.83
July 15, 2024
July 17, 2024
July 22, 2024
October 23, 2024
November 7, 2024
December 18, 2024
January 23, 2025
January 27, 2025
March 5, 2025
March 17, 2025
March 20, 2025
April 30, 2025
May 19, 2025
Pro.ect Expenditures:

Park
Park
Park
Park
Park
Park
Park
Park
Park
Park
Park
Park
Park
Park
Fac Fee/15109 Ryon
Fac Fee/13610 Clark
Fac Fee/8740 Cedar
Fac Fee/14037 Charlemagne
Fac Fee/16415 Cornuta
Fac Fee/9509 Prichard
Fac Fee/9720 Flower St
Fac Fee/15302 Leahy
Fac Fee/16620 Grand Ave
Fac Fee/9700 Mayne St
Fac Fee/14703 Betty Jean
Fac Fee/10236 Walnut
Fac Fee/16659 Chicago Ave
Fac Fee/17648 Downey Ave
Park Master Plan
Simms Park Improvements
Constitution Park Improvements
Thompson Park Improvements
Public Fac Fee/15109 Ryon
Public Fac Fee/17640 Bellflower
Public Fac Fee/13610 Clark
Public Fac Fee/14037 Charlemagne
Public Fac Fee/16415 Cornuta
Public Fac Fee/9509 Prichard
Public Fac Fee/9720 Flower
Public Fac Fee/15302 Leahy
Public Fac Fee/9333 Rosecrans Ave
Public Fac Fee/9700 Mayne St
Public Fac Fee/14703 Betty Jean
Public Fac Fee/16659 Chicago Ave
Public Fac Fee/17648 Downey Ave
https://bellflowergcc.sharepoint.com/sites/fin/Shared Documents/AA/Treasurer's Reports/TR 25-765R-26-03

DEVELOPMENT IMPACT/OTHER FEES
Revenue and Expenditure Detail Report
(July 1, 2024 - June 30, 2025)

PUBLIC ARTS FEES
Revenues:
$ 16,000.00 July 17, 2024
465.00 March 4, 2025
11,000.00 March 5, 2025

25.90 May 19, 2025
$ 27,490.90
Pro'ect Expenditures:
$ 69,867.20
24,200.00
94,067.20

PUBLIC SAFETY FACILITIES FEES
Revenues:
$ 4,006.20
119.80

0.90 119.80
287.04
119.90
110.00
1,631.85
220.50
120.00
1,946.74
511.30
1,015.28
$ 10,209.31
July 17, 2024
July 22, 2024
October 3, 2024
October 23, 2024
November 7, 2024
December 18, 2024
January 27, 2025
March 5, 2025
March 17, 2025
March 20, 2025
April 18, 2025
April 30, 2025
May 19, 2025
Pro'ect Expenditures:

TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES FEES
Revenues:
$ 63,079.44 July 17, 2024
4,696.16 July 22, 2024
4,696.16 October 23, 2024
6,933.12 November 7, 2024
4,700.08 December 18, 2024
4,312.00 January 27, 2025
25,694.22 March 5, 2025
8,643.60 March 17, 2025
4,704.00 March 20, 2025
20,042.96 April 30, 2025
147,501.74
Pro ect Expenditures:

Public Arts Fee/17640 Bellflower
Public Arts Fee/16620 Grand Ave
Public Arts Fee/9333 Rosecrans Ave
Public Arts Fee/17648 Downey Ave
Bellflower Gateway Sign
Veterans Memorial Modifications
Public Safety Fac Fee/17640 Bellflower
Public Safety Fac Fee/13610 Clark
Public Safety Fac Fee/9119 Artesia
Public Safety Fac Fee/14037 Charlemagne
Public Safety Fac Fee/16415 Cornuta
Public Safety Fac Fee/9509 Prichard
Public Safety Fac Fee/15302 Leahy
Public Safety Fee/9333 Rosecrans Ave
Public Safety Fee/9700 Mayne St
Public Safety Fac Fee/14703 Betty Jean
Public Safety Fac Fee/10236 Walnut
Public Safety Fac Fee/16659 Chicago Ave
Public Safety Fee/17648 Downey Ave
Transportation
Transportation
Transportation
Transportation
Transportation
Transportation
Transportation
Transportation
Transportation
Transportation
Fac Fee/17640 Bellflower
Fac Fee/13610 Clark
Fac Fee/14037 Charlemagne
Fac Fee/16415 Cornuta
Fac Fee/9509 Prichard
Fac Fee/15302 Leahy
Fac Fee/9333 Rosecrans Ave
Fac Fee/9700 Mayne St
Fac Fee/14703 Betty Jean
Fac Fee/16659 Chicago Ave
https://bellflowergcc.sharepoint.com/sites/fin/Shared Documents/AA/Treasurer's Reports/TR 25-766R-26-03

CITY OF BELLFLOWER AND BELLFLOWER SUCCESSOR AGENCY
INVESTMENTS REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF MARCH 2026

CASH AND INVESTMENTS BY TYPE
(As of April 16, 2026)
Dollar Amount Invested
Beginning
Balance/
(Deficit)
Disbursements/
Bond Prem.

Deposits Amort./Discount
Ending
Balance/
(Deficit)
Par
Value
Market
Value
Yield
Interest (If Diff.)/
Rate Steps
Type of
Investment/
Deposit
Issuer of
Investment/
Deposit
Date of
Maturity
CITY OF BELLFLOWER :

State of California
Local Agency Investment Fund (1)
Los Angeles County Pooled Investment Fund (5)
CalTrust / Local Agency Investment Pool (4)
- Liquidity Fund (City)
- Liquidity Fund (Deposit)
Cash / Investments Held By Bond Trustee -
Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company
- Dreyfus Treasury Securities Cash Management -
Institutional / (2008/2018) 2021 COPs
- Dreyfus Treasury Securities Cash Management -
Institutional / 2021 Pension Obligation Bonds
Cash / Investments Held By Custodian -
Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company
- Federal Home Loan Bank
- Federal Home Loan Bank
- Federal Farm Credit Banks Funding Corporation
- Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation
- Federal Home Loan Bank
- Federal Home Loan Bank
- Federal Home Loan Bank
- Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation
- Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation
- Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation
- Dreyfus Treasury Securities Cash Management -
Institutional
$ 44,790,070 $ 2,000,000 $ (2,500,000) $ 44,290,070 N/A $ 44,289,221 3.826% 144,517 340
44,834,393 143,082
54,730 174
1,348 59,660
255 15
144,857 N/A 142,136 3.130%
44,977,475 N/A 44,977,475 3.760%
54,904 N/A 54,904 3.760%
61,008 N/A 61,008 3.520%
270 N/A 270 3.530%
3,000,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 2,985,600 3.770%
3,000,000 - - 3,000,000 3,000,000 2,996,160 4.000%
2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 1,989,140 3.950%
3,000,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 2,968,770 3.500%
3,000,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 2,990,070 4.050%
2,500,000 2,500,000 2,500,000 2,494,200 4.050%
3,000,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 3,001,410 4.500%
4,000,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 3,980,240 4.740%
3,000,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 2,996,550 4.000%
2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 1,983,080 4.000%
11,441,243 70,454 - 11,511,697 N/A 11,511,697 3.520%
See attached Pooled Money Investment Account Portfolio.

Detail report available at:
https://www.treasurer.ca.gov/pmia-laif/pmia/index.asp
See attached Los Angeles County Pooled Surplus Investments.

Detail report available at:
https://ttc.lacounty.gov/monthly-reports/
Local Agency
Investment Pool
Local Agency
Investment Pool
Money Market Fund
Money Market Fund
U.S. Agency Bonds
U.S. Agency Bonds
U.S. Agency Bonds
U.S. Agency Bonds
Investment Trust of
California, dba CaITRUST
Investment Trust of
California, dba CaITRUST
Dreyfus
Dreyfus
N/A
N/A
Federal Home Loan Bank 6/15/2028
Federal Home Loan Bank 8/21/2028
Federal Farm Credit
Banks Funding 9/25/2028
Federal Home Loan
Mortgage Corporation 11/17/2028
U.S. Agency Bonds Federal Home Loan Bank 6/22/2029
U.S. Agency Bonds Federal Home Loan Bank 8/20/2029
U.S. Agency Bonds
U.S. Agency Bonds
U.S. Agency Bonds
U.S. Agency Bonds
Money Market Fund
Federal Home Loan Bank 12/10/2029
Federal Agricultural
Mortgage Corporation 5/28/2030
Federal Home Loan
Mortgage Corporation 11/20/2030
Federal Home Loan
Mortgage Corporation 12/16/2030
Dreyfus N/A
https://bellflowergcc.sharepointcom/sites/fin/Shared Documents/AA/Treasurer's Reports/TR 25-26/TR 26-03

CITY OF BELLFLOWER AND BELLFLOWER SUCCESSOR AGENCY
INVESTMENTS REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF MARCH 2026

CASH AND INVESTMENTS BY TYPE
(As of April 16, 2026)
Charles Schwab Trust Bank
- Section 115 Pension Stabilization Trust
Investments / Mutual Funds
Trust Cash
- Section 115 OPEB Trust
Investments / Mutual Funds
Trust Cash

TOTAL INVESTMENTS
BANK DEPOSITS (2):
- General Operating Account (3)
- Payroll Account (3)
- Revolving Account (3)
- Sec. 125 Flex Spending Account (3)
- Pooled Cash Allocated to SA

TOTAL BANK DEPOSITS

PETTY CASH
CITY -

TOTAL DEPOSITS AND INVESTMENTS
Dollar Amount Invested
Beginning
Balance/
(Deficit)
Disbursements/
Bond Prem.

Deposits Amort./Discount
Ending
Balance/
(Deficit)
Par
Value
Market
Value
Yield
Interest (If Diff.)/
Rate Steps
Type of
Investment/
Deposit
Issuer of
Investment/
Deposit
Date of
Maturity
2,647,992 5,622
16,131 7,261
11,244,428 23,313
66,098 30,028
2,653,614
(5,733) 17,659
11,267,741
(23,769) 72,357
143,741,205
2,339,949 (2,529,502) 143,551,652
3,256,583 9,632,246 (8,881,178) 4,007,651
(12,869) 1,368,967 (1,363,115) (7,017)
194,082 (194,082) -
36,739 - (4,278) 32,461
(6,656) 1,711 - (4,945)
3,273,797 11,197,006 (10,442,653) 4,028,150
4,060
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
3,121,159 N/A
17,659 0.010
12,875,480 N/A
72,357 0.010%
145,508,586
N/A 4,007,651
N/A (7,017)
N/A -
N/A 32,461
N/A (4,945)
4,060 N/A
4,028,150
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
4,060 N/A
$ 147,019,062 $ 13,536,955 $ (12,972,155) $ 147,583,862 $ 149,540,796 Various Investments
Mutual Funds
Trust Cash Account
Various Investments
Mutual Funds
Trust Cash Account
Checking Account
Checking Account
Checking Account
Checking Account
Various; Held by Charles
Schwab Trust
Charles Schwab Trust
Bank
/ Various; Held by Charles
Schwab Trust
Charles Schwab Trust
Bank
BMO
BMO
BMO
BMO
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
https://bellflowergcc.sharepointcom/sites/fin/Shared Documents/AA/Treasurer's Reports/TR 25-26/TR 26-03

CITY OF BELLFLOWER AND BELLFLOWER SUCCESSOR AGENCY
INVESTMENTS REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF MARCH 2026

CASH AND INVESTMENTS BY TYPE
(As of April 16, 2026)
Dollar Amount Invested
Beginning
Balance/
(Deficit)
Disbursements/
Bond Prem.

Deposits Amort./Discount
Ending Yield Type of Issuer of
Balance/ Par Market Interest (If Diff.)/ Investment/ Investment/ Date of (Deficit) Value Value Rate Steps Deposit Deposit Maturity SUCCESSOR AGENCY:

BMO Business Checking Account (2) (3) $ 43,118 $ - $ (3,450) $ 39.668 N/A $ 39,668 N/A CalTrust / Local Agency Investment Pool (4)
- Liquidity Fund (SA BUSD TRUST) 317,008 1,012 318,020 N/A 318,020 3.760% Cash / Investments Held By Bond Trustee -
Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company
- Taxable Tax Allocation Refunding Bonds, Series 2016
Dreyfus Treasury Securities Cash Management - 9,044 65 - 9,109 N/A 9,109 3.520% Institutional
TOTAL INVESTMENTS 369,170 1,077 (3,450) 366,797 366,797 Pooled Cash Account 6,656 (1,711) 4,945 N/A 4,945 N/A

SUCCESSOR AGENCY -

TOTAL DEPOSITS AND INVESTMENTS

CITY & SUCCESSOR AGENCY -

TOTAL DEPOSITS AND INVESTMENTS
$ 375,826 $ 1,077 $ (5,161) $ 371,742
$ 371,742
$ 147,394,888 $ 13,538,032 $ (12,977,316) $ 147,955,604 $ 149,912,538 Checking Account
Local Agency
Investment Pool
Money Market Fund

BMO N/A
Investment Trust of
California, dba CaITRUST
Dreyfus N/A
NOTES:
(1) Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) is a special fund of the California State Treasury through which local governments may pool investments. The market value factor is provided by LAIF on a quarterly basis as of March 31, June 30, September 30, and December 31. The intervening months' market values are estimates. (2) All bank deposits are insured up to $250,000 by the FDIC. Under the California Government Code, banks and savings are also required to secure the City's deposits by either (1) pledging government securities with market value of at least 110% of the deposits as collateral, or (2) pledging first trust deed mortgage notes having a value of at least 150% of the deposits. Bank deposits, CDs and money market account market values are the same as the carrying values. (3) Analysis account.
(4) CaITRUST is a joint powers authority formed by a number of public agencies in California to provide a method of pooling for investment purposes. (5) Los Angeles County Pooled Investment Fund is an investment pool managed by the L.A. County Treasurer. Market value and interest rate are estimates based on the preceding month's data.

A. The City's investment portfolio complies with the Statement of Investment Policy.

B. Based on the City's current cash and investment position and estimated cash flows, the City will meet its expenditure requirements for the next six months.

C. Interest rates and market values are provided on the monthly trustee, custody, investment, and investment pool statements and websites. htips://belIAowergcc.sharepoint.com/sites/fn/Shared Documents/AA/Treasurers Reports/TR 25-26/TR 26-03

INVESTMENTS REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF MARCH 2026
SUPPLEMENTAL LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES FUND - FUND NO. 050

STATEMENT OF RECEIPTS, ALLOCATIONS AND EXPENDITURES
(As of April 16, 2026)
Beginning Cash Balance
Receipts:

SLESF Funding
Interest
Total Receipts
Expenditures/Allocations:

L.A. County Sheriffs Department/
City Public Safety
General Law Cars
Equipment Leases / Purchases
Total Expenditures/Allocations
Net Adjustment (Receivables & Payables)
Ending Cash Balance
ACTUAL
Fiscal Year
2024-25
ACTUAL
Reporting
Month
FY 2025-26
To Date
BUDGET
Fiscal Year
2025-26
$ 416,959 $ 471,565 $ 506,656 $ 506,656
232,113 9,479
20,711
252,824 9,479 240,575 254,000
229,714
10,861
241,000
13,000
(150,000)
(12,460)
(162,460) (1,187) (267,778) (301,000)
(1,187)
(250,000)
(17,778)
(250,000)
(51,000)
(667) - 404
$ 506,656 $ 479,857 $ 479,857 $ 459,656
https://bellflowergcc.sharepoint.com/sites/fin/Shared Documents/AA/Treasurer's Reports/TR 25-26/TR 26,031 0 -

CITY OF BELLFLOWER & BELLFLOWER SUCCESSOR AGENCY

INVESTMENTS REPORT
The City of Bellflower and Successor Agency invest funds in the State of California Local Agency Investment Fund and the Los Angeles County Pooled Investment Fund. The latest summary reports are attached, and the detail reports are available at:

State of California Local Agency Investment Fund:

Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF)
http://www.treasurer.ca.gov/pmia-laif/laif/index.asp
Pooled Money Investment Account (PMIA)
http://www.treasurer.ca.gov/pmia-laif/pmia/index.asp
PMIA Market Valuation
https://www.treasurer.ca.gov/pmia-laif/reports/valuation.asp PMIA Selected Investment Data
https://www.treasurer.ca.gov/pmia-laif/performance/data.pdf Los Angeles County Pooled Investment Fund:

Los Angeles County Pooled Surplus Investments
https://ttc.lacounty.gov/monthly-reports/
https://bellflowergcc.sharepoint.com/sites/fin/Shared Documents/AA/Treasurer's Reports/TR 25-26/TR 26-631 1 -

‘11YEST4,1,.. State of California

4. , 111 �c, Pooled Money Investment Account
a 401"z Market Valuation
,pA 0
F""k ilou,00 �\�� 3/31/2026
Carrying Cost Plus
Description Accrued Interest Purch. Amortized Cost Fair Value Accrued Interest United States Treasury:

Bills
$ 44,722,522,982.34
$ 45,041,222,236.88
$ 45,033,151,400.00
NA
Notes
$ 49,292,258,674.55
$ 49,271,989,419.91
$ 49,320,696,150.00
$ 406,254,298.00
Federal Acency:

SBA
$ 284,735,106.47
$ 284,670,977.29
$ 282,270,088.95
$ 954,910.41
MBS-REMICs
$ 828,976.21
$ 828,976.21
$ 834,536.98
$ 3,616.34
Debentures
$ 4,170,836,653.34
$ 4,170,836,653.34
$ 4,169,747,640.00
$ 33,432,528.40
Debentures FR
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
Debentures CL
$ 2,450,000,000.00
$ 2,450,000,000.00
$ 2,447,226,000.00
$ 31,675,185.50
Discount Notes
$ 18,589,440,826.53
$ 18,748,772,124.99
$ 18,737,614,500.00
NA
Supranational:

Debentures
$ 4,234,413,202.81
$ 4,234,289,244.48
$ 4,225,099,790.00
$ 34,129,170.50
Debentures FR
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
Debentures CL
$ 300,000,000.00
$ 300,000,000.00
$ 300,916,000.00
$ 2,155,555.00
Discount Notes
$ 5,996,263,597.22
$ 6,051,445,319.44
$ 6,048,424,000.00
NA
CDs and YCDs FR
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
Bank Notes
$ 400,000,000.00
$ 400,000,000.00
$ 399,517,809.83
$ 3,603,472.22
CDs and YCDs
$ 17,400,000,000.00
$ 17,400,000,000.00
$ 17,390,638,342.15
$ 180,555,958.37
Commercial Paper
$ 10,784,921,083.25
$ 10,855,911,297.17
$ 10,853,096,291.64
NA
Corporate:

Bonds FR
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
Bonds
$ 973,660,364.24
$ 973,256,676.74
$ 970,809,904.00
$ 9,472,413.81
Repurchase Agreements
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
Reverse Repurchase
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
Time Deposits
$ 5,472,000,000.00
$ 5,472,000,000.00
$ 5,472,000,000.00
NA
PMIA & GF Loans
$ 266,015,740.00
$ 266,015,740.00
$ 266,015,740.00
NA
TOTAL
$ 165,337,897,206.96
$ 165,921,238,666.'-5
$ 165,9 8,058,193.55
$ 702,237, 08.55
Fair Value Including Accrued Interest
Repurchase Agreements, Time Deposits, PMIA & General Fund loans, and Reverse Repurchase agreements are carried at portfolio book value (carrying cost). $ 166,620,295,302.10
The value of each participating dollar equals the fair value divided by the amortized cost (0.999980831) As an example: if an agency has an account balance of $20,000,000.00, then the agency would report its participation in the LAIF valued at $19,999,616.63 or $20,000,000.00 x0.999980831 - 12 -

�avEsr�Ff
'sue POOLED MONEY INVESTMENT ACCOUNT
Selected Investment Data
Analysis of the Pooled Money Investment Account Portfolio (Dollars In Thousands)
March 31, 2026

TYPE OF SECURITY
*DIFFERENCE IN

PERCENT OF
*PERCENT OF PORTFOLIO FROM
AMOUNT ($) PORTFOLIO PRIOR MONTH
Government
Bills
Bonds
Notes
Strips
Total Government
Agency Debentures
Certificates of Deposit
Bank Notes
Repurchases
Agency Discount Notes
Time Deposits
GNMAs
Commercial Paper
Remics
Corporate Bonds
PMIA Loans
GF Loans
Other
Reversed Repurchases
Total (AII Types)
*Percentages may be off due to rounding.
44,722,523 27.05
0 0.00
49,292,259 29.81
0 o.00
94, 014, 782

56.86 -0.80
11,439,985 6.92
17,400,000 10.53
400,000 0.24
0 0.00
24,585,704 14.87
5,472,000 3.31
0 o.00
10,784,921 6.52
829 0.00
973,660 0.59
266,016 0.16
0 o.00
0 o.00
0 o.00
165,337,897 100.00
-0.20
+1.08
+0.06
0 -0.69
0 0
+0.53
0 +0.02
0 0
0 0

INVESTMENT ACTIVITY
March 2026 February 2026
Pooled Money
Time Deposits
Other
Total
NUMBER
1,149
80 7
PMIA Monthly Average Effective Yield (%)
Year to Date Yield Last Day of Month (%)
1,236
AMOUNT($) NUMBER
57, 092, 794 1,128
3,320,000 54
1,235,730 5
61, 648, 524

3.826

4.071
AMOUNT ($)
56,124, 798
1,516,000
101,364
1,187 57, 742,162

3.871

4.102
- 13 -

THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY POOLED SURPLUS INVESTMENTS
The Treasurer and Tax Collector (Treasurer) of Los Angeles County has the delegated authority to invest funds on deposit in the County Treasury (Treasury Pool). As of February 28, 2026, investments in the Treasury Pool were held for local agencies including school districts, community college districts, special districts and discretionary depositors such as cities and independent districts in the following amounts:

Local Agency
County of Los Angeles and Special Districts
Schools and Community Colleges
Discretionary Participants
Total
Invested Funds
(in billions)
$24.350

28.136

3.536
$56.022
The Treasury Pool participation composition is as follows:

Non -discretionary Participants
Discretionary Participants:

Independent Public Agencies
County Bond Proceeds and Repayment Funds
Total

93.69%

6.18%

0.13%
100.00`)/0
Decisions on the investment of funds in the Treasury Pool are made by the County Investment Officer in accordance with established policy, with certain transactions requiring the Treasurer's prior approval. In Los Angeles County, investment decisions are governed by Chapter 4 (commencing with Section 53600) of Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 5 of the California Government Code, which governs legal investments by local agencies in the State of California, and by a more restrictive Investment Policy developed by the Treasurer and adopted by the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors on an annual basis. The Investment Policy adopted on March 11, 2025, reaffirmed the following criteria and order of priority for selecting investments:

1. Safety of Principal

2. Liquidity

3. Return on Investment
The Treasurer prepares a monthly Report of Investments summarizing the status of the Treasury Pool, including the current market value of all investments. This report is submitted monthly to the Board of Supervisors. According to the Report of Investments dated March 31, 2026, the February 28, 2026, book value of the Treasury Pool was approximately $56.022 billion, and the corresponding market value was approximately $54.970 billion.
- 14 -

An internal controls system for monitoring cash accounting and investment practices is in place. The Treasurer's Compliance Auditor, who operates independently from the Investment Officer, reconciles cash and investments to fund balances daily. The Compliance Auditor's staff also reviews each investment trade for accuracy and compliance with the Board adopted Investment Policy. On a quarterly basis, the County's outside independent auditor (External Auditor) reviews the cash and investment reconciliations for completeness and accuracy. Additionally, the External Auditor reviews investment transactions on a quarterly basis for conformance with the approved Investment Policy and annually accounts for all investments.

The following table identifies the types of securities held by the Treasury Pool as of February 28, 2026:

Type of Investment
Certificates of Deposit
U.S. Government and Agency Obligations
Bank Acceptances
Commercial Paper
Municipal Obligations
Corporate Notes & Deposit Notes
Repurchase Agreements
Asset Backed Instruments
Other
of Pool

3.84 65.81

0.00 30.32

0.03 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 100.00
The Treasury Pool is highly liquid. As of February 28, 2026, approximately 41.97% of the investments mature within 60 days, with an average of 374 days to maturity for the entire portfolio.

TreasPool Update
02/28/2026
- 15 -

POOLED SURPLUS INVESTMENTS (PSI) EARNINGS REPORT
FEBRUARY 28, 2026

SCHEDULE B

TREASURER POOLED SURPLUS

INVESTMENTS PORTFOLIO
Investment Balance 02/28/26
Market Value at 02/28/26
Average Daily Balance
Gains and Losses:

For the Month
For the Past 12 Months
Unrealized Gains and Losses on Transfers
between Portfolio for the Month
Earnings for the Month
Earnings for the Past 12 Months
Earnings Rate for the Month
$ 56,021,978,742
$ 54,969,716,173
$ 55,591,080,085
$ 0
$ 506,727
$
$ 133,875,620
$ 1,909,464,871

3.13%
- 16 -

Gl pBELLFLoh.��
'CROWING TOGF.VVO-
staf�eport 1 5-C
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
ATTENTION: Ryan Smoot, City Manager
FROM: Len Gorecki, Assistant City Manager/Director of Public Works Kimberly Gonzalez, Public Works Coordinator
SUBJECT:

Consideration and possible action to award a contract to Thermal Concepts, Inc. for the HVAC Building Automation Systems at City Hall and Simms Park and authorize the City Manager to execute Agreement File No. 777.4 in a form approved by the City Attorney.

Date: April 27, 2026

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This action would award a contract to Thermal Concepts, Inc. (TCI), to install a new HVAC building automation system at City Hall and Simms Park and integrate the City's multiple HVAC systems into a single enterprise platform (the Project).

RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL
1) Authorize the City Manager to execute Agreement File No. 777.4 with Thermal Concepts, Inc., in a form approved by the City Attorney; or 2) Alternatively, discuss and take other action related to this item.

FISCAL IMPACT
Funding for the Project is included in the Capital Projects Budget for FY2025-2026 in Account Nos. 030-53602-9000 and 011-47250-9000. The total cost for the Project is $70,743.59.

DISCUSSION
On October 24, 2024, the Economic Development Department was notified that its application for the Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant (EECBG) Program Equipment Rebate Voucher was approved by the U.S. Department of Energy. This program provides funding to local government agencies to reduce energy use, improve energy efficiency and cut greenhouse emissions.

In accordance with BMC Section 3.30.030, staff contacted the City's current HVAC system provider, TCI, and requested a proposal to upgrade the HVAC systems at City Hall and Simms Park. TCI provided a proposal in the amount of $32,011.73 to upgrade the system at City Hall and a proposal in the amount of $26,186.58 to upgrade the system at Simms Park.

-1-

Staff Report — Award of Contract for the HVAC Building Automation Systems at City Hall and Simms Park
April 27, 2026

DISCUSSION — Continued
In addition, staff requested that TCI provide a proposal to unify the City's multiple HVAC system interfaces. The City currently operates multiple building automation and control systems across its facilities. These systems operate independently therefore limiting centralized visibility by our IT Division. TCI provided a proposal in the amount of $12,545.28 to integrate the City's multiple building systems and field devices into a single enterprise interface. This will enable centralized monitoring, control, and connect all facilities into one interface across the City's network. This platform will also allow for integration of future systems.

In an effort to comply with the procurement requirements for the EECBG, staff received a proposal from Air Conditioning Solutions (ACS) for the same services. The table below itemizes the comparison in pricing amongst the proposals received from TCI and ACS:

Contractor
City Hall
HVAC System
Simms Park
HVAC System
Enterprise
Platform
Total Cost
Thermal Concepts,
Inc.
$32,011.73
$26,186.58
$12,545.28
$70,743.59
Air Conditioning
Solutions
$28,695.00
$27,819.00
$25,125.00
$81 639.00
The Public Works Coordinator verified TCI's contractor's license status, registration with the Department of Industrial Relations, and their debarment status. The City currently contracts with TCI for maintenance of its HVAC systems therefore the Director recommends that the City contract with TCI for the Project. -2-

of BELLFLow
G1 r FR
'64°147-NG TOGE'n
statreport
1 5-D
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
ATTENTION: Ryan Smoot, City Manager
FROM: Jim DellaLonga, Director of Economic Development
Elizabeth C. Oba, Director of Planning and Building Services Kathryn Brun, Senior Planner
SUBJECT: Consideration and possible action to waive further reading and adopt Ordinance No. 1456 — An Ordinance approving 1) Zone Change Case No. ZC 25-02 to amend the zoning map from Transit -Oriented Development Specific Plan ("TODSP") to Flower Street Specific Plan ("FSSP") on real property commonly known as 9855, 9903, and 9915 Flower Street; 2) Specific Plan Case No. SP 25-01 for Flower Street Specific Plan ("FSSP") which provides the development and design standards for the three parcels; and 3) Development Agreement No.

AFN 1125.1 between Bellflower 5 Inv, LLC and the City to facilitate development of 9903 Flower Street and potential future development of 9855 Flower Street; Applicant: Eric Miller representing City Ventures Homebuilding, LLC and City of Bellflower
DATE: April 27, 2026

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Ordinance No. 1456 was introduced on April 13, 2026. Second reading and adoption is recommended. If adopted, the Ordinance will take effect in 30 days.

RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL
1) Waive further reading and adopt Ordinance No. 1456; or 2) Alternatively, discuss and take other action related to this item.

FISCAL IMPACT
None.

ATTACHMENTS
A. Ordinance No. 1456

1. Exhibit A — Development Agreement File No. AFN 1125.1

2. Exhibit B — Zoning Map Amendment

3. Exhibit C — Flower Street Specific Plan
B. April 13, 2026, Staff Report (Without Attachments)
-1-

ATTACHMENT A
Ordinance No. 1456
-2-

CITY OF BELLFLOWER
ORDINANCE NO. 1456
AN ORDINANCE APPROVING 1) ZONE CHANGE CASE
NO. ZC 25-02 TO AMEND THE ZONING MAP FROM

TRANSIT -ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT SPECIFIC PLAN
("TODSP") TO FLOWER STREET SPECIFIC PLAN ("FSSP")
ON REAL PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 9855, 9903,
AND 9915 FLOWER STREET; 2) SPECIFIC PLAN CASE NO. SP
25-01 FOR FLOWER STREET SPECIFIC PLAN ("FSSP")

WHICH PROVIDES THE DEVELOPMENT AND DESIGN
STANDARDS FOR THE THREE PARCELS; AND
3) DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FILE NO. 1125.1 BETWEEN
BELLFLOWER 5 INV, LLC AND THE CITY TO FACILITATE
DEVELOPMENT OF 9903 FLOWER STREET AND POTENTIAL
FUTURE DEVELOPMENT OF 9855 FLOWER STREET;
APPLICANT: ERIC MILLER REPRESENTING CITY VENTURES

HOMEBUILDING, LLC AND CITY OF BELLFLOWER
THE CITY COUNCIL DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. Recitals. The City Council finds and declares as follows:

A. On March 24, 2025, Eric Miller, representing City Ventures Homebuilding, LLC ("Applicant"), filed an application and submitted plans associated with development located at 9903 Flower Street ("Development"). To provide a more comprehensive development concept for the area, the Applicant proposed a Specific Plan on real property commonly known as 9855, 9903, and 9915 Flower Street (collectively known as the "Specific Plan Area"). The Applicant proposes the following: 1) a Zone Change from Transit -Oriented Development Specific Plan ("TODSP") to Flower Street Specific Plan ("FSSP") for the Specific Plan Area; 2) the FSSP which provides the development and design standards for the Specific Plan Area; and 3) a Development Agreement between Bellflower 5 Inv, LLC and the City to facilitate development of 9903 Flower Street and potential future development of 9855 Flower Street (collectively, the "Project");
B. The proposed Project was reviewed by the City for, in part, consistency with the General Plan and conformity with the Bellflower Municipal Code ("BMC"); C. In addition, the City reviewed the Project's environmental impacts under the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code §§ 21000, et seq., "CEQA") and the regulations promulgated thereunder (14 California Code of Regulations §§ 15000, et seq., the "CEQA Guidelines"); D. The City completed its review and scheduled a public hearing regarding the proposed Project, before the City Council — acting as the City's Planning Agency in accordance with § BMC 2.32.050(F) - for March 23, 2026;

-3-

City of Bellflower
Ordinance No. 1456

E. On March 23, 2026, the City Council took action to continue the item to April 13, 2026 due to necessary changes to the documents for consideration; F. Notice of Public Hearing before the City Council was duly given and published in time, form, and manner as required by law;
G. On April 13, 2026, the City Council conducted a public hearing to consider the Project including, without limitation, conditions of approval, related environmental aspects of the Project as required by the BMC, this Ordinance, Resolution No. 26-13, and the Development Agreement;
H. On April 13, 2026, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 26-13 certifying MND 25-01 and granted the discretionary approvals for the Project (identified by the City as Case Nos. GPA 25-02, DR 3-25-16185, and TM 84789).

In addition, Ordinance No. 1456 had its first reading on said date; I. The City Council has carefully considered all pertinent testimony and the staff report offered in the case as presented at the public hearing of April 13, 2026; and
J. This Ordinance, and its findings, are based upon the entire administrative record considered during the April 13, 2026, public hearing including, without limitation, the staff report and accompanying documents.

SECTION 2. Planning Agency. Pursuant to BMC § 2.32.050(F), the City Council is acting as the Bellflower Planning Agency for purposes of the Project.

SECTION 3. Development Agreement Findings. Pursuant to Government Code § 65867.5, the City Council finds the following:

A. The Development Agreement is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Bellflower. The Development Agreement furthers the goals of the General Plan and will, among other things, facilitate the development of the Project at a site that is currently vacant and underutilized, which is consistent with the following General Plan policies:

1. Land Use Element General Policy 1.1 — Provide land use designations which match actual viable uses;

2. Land Use Element General Policy 1.2 — Encourage opportunities to sensitively integrate different, but compatible land use;

3. Land Use Element General Policy 2.7 — Carefully scrutinize plans for developments which will have a significant impact on the city or on surrounding developments to ensure the highest quality design;

4. Land Use Element General Policy 2.8 — Encourage rehabilitation or redevelopment of designated commercial and industrial areas;

5. Housing Element Policy 5.1 — Provide a range of housing types, including low density single-family homes, moderate density -4-

City of Bellflower
Ordinance No. 1456

townhomes, higher density multi -family units, and
residential/commercial mixed use in order to address the City's Regional Housing Needs Allocation ("RHNA');

6. Housing Element Policy 5.3 — Encourage infill development and reuse of underutilized land, where reuse is consistent with desired neighborhood character; and

7. Housing Element Policy 5.6 — Explore opportunities for new residential development within those areas of the City occupied by vacant or underutilized commercial or industrial uses.

B. The Development Agreement also provides certainty in planning and construction as well as orderly development, while providing assurance to the Applicant that it may construct the Project.

SECTION 4. Zone Change Findings. Pursuant to BMC § 17.104.030, the City Council finds the following:

A. There are changed conditions since the existing zoning became effective to warrant other or additional zoning, in that the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) assigned by the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) for the City of Bellflower's 6th (2021 - 2029) Housing Element cycle is 3,735 units. The proposed Zone Change from TODSP to FSSP would allow for residential developments which will count towards meeting the assigned RHNA allocation.

B. The proposed change of zone does not adversely affect adjoining property as to value or precedent, and will not be detrimental to the area, in that the proposed Zone Change from TODSP to FSSP allows vacant and underutilized properties to be redeveloped for residential development. The Project does not create a negative precedent and instead furthers the City's interest in increasing the housing stock. The proposed Zone Change is consistent with the existing residential properties surrounding the Project.

C. The change of zone is in the interest or furtherance of public health, safety and general welfare, in that the proposed Project must comply with applicable standards and requirements contained in the FSSP and the BMC including, without limitation, the California Building Standards Code as adopted by the BMC relating to construction and paving, structural foundations, etc.

Compliance with these standards and requirements ensure that future construction of the proposed Project would not be compromised or cause hazards to the public. One of the requirements for the Project is to include a storm water containment/treatment system, which is currently not in place.

D. Approving the Zone Change will not adversely affect the Comprehensive Zoning Plan in that the Zone Change from TODSP to FSSP would allow for more viable opportunities along Flower Street. The proposed Zone Change would not adversely affect the comprehensive zoning plan in that residential -5-

City of Bellflower
Ordinance No. 1456

developments will comply with the development standards set forth within the FSSP, Project Review, and the BMC.

SECTION 5. Specific Plan Findings. Pursuant to BMC § 17.106.070, the City Council finds the following:

A. The proposed FSSP promotes public health, safety, and general welfare, and serves the goals and purposes of the BMC Title 17 in that: 1) future development within the project area will benefit from focused planning efforts whereby infrastructure, land use relationships, land use intensities, and public service needs will be carefully examined and planned in a comprehensive manner and the FSSP provides a mechanism to carry out such planning efforts; and 2) the guidelines and standards in the FSSP are consistent with regional planning documents and complementary to adjacent zoning districts.

B. The proposed FSSP is consistent with the goals, policies, and objectives of the General Plan, as described in Section 3 of this Ordinance.

C. The proposed FSSP will not adversely affect surrounding properties in that the FSSP would allow vacant and underutilized properties to be redeveloped for residential use. The FSSP provides clear design guidelines and standards to allow for flexibility in the implementation and build -out of planned development within the FSSP while also meeting all applicable performance standards of the Land Use Element. All projects will address impacts related to air pollution, dust, noise, drainage and stormwater runoff, water pollution, light pollution, visual impacts, and traffic. All future developments are subject to a project review process that will ensure that the architecture and landscaping are high - quality and complement the surrounding development in the vicinity of the FSSP.

SECTION 6. Environmental Review. This Project was reviewed for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (California Public Resources Code §§ 21000, et seq., "CEQA") and CEQA regulations (14 California Code of Regulations §§ 15000, et seq.; the "CEQA Guidelines"). An Initial Study ("IS") and MND 25-01 were prepared. These found that the proposed Ordinance will not have a significant adverse effect on the environment with implementation of proposed mitigation measures. The 30 -day public review period for the MND began on January 9, 2026 and closed on February 9, 2026. Resolution No. 26-13 adopted the IS/MND and directed the City Manager, or designee, to file a Notice of Determination.

SECTION 7. General Plan and Zoning. The proposed Project conforms to the Bellflower General Plan, as set forth in Section 3. The Zone Change is intended to facilitate residential development to meet the City's assigned RHNA allocation as set forth in Section 4.

SECTION 8. Public Benefits. The Development Agreement provides for public benefits including, without limitation:
-6-

City of Bellflower
Ordinance No. 1456

A. The Project is part of City's downtown and its revitalization is crucial for the economic revitalization of the downtown.

B. The Project is located on underutilized property. Improving the property through private investment increases tax revenue for public welfare and is a critical component of City's overall plan for a thriving downtown.

C. Providing housing which will help to satisfy City's obligation to meet City's share of regional housing needs.

D. Fulfilling the long-term economic goals for City by providing housing to help offset the jobs/housing imbalance.

E. Providing for -sale housing units to increase City's overall housing supply.

F. The Project creates economic opportunity to City and all property tax collecting entities in that development of the Project will result in an increase of at least 15 percent of total property tax resulting from the Project at full implementation when compared to the year before the Property being acquired by City.

G. Relieving pressure to build housing in existing neighborhoods.

H. Providing short-term construction employment within City.

I. Enhancing access to City's public recreational facilities by contributing toward a transit -oriented development Project within walking distance to a Class III bikeway, Library Garden Park, Town Center Plaza, Friendship Plaza, Pirate Park, the Los Angeles County Health Department, the Los Angeles County Library, and the Mayne Events Center.

J. As designed, the Project provides a balance of density, cohesiveness and integration into the surrounding downtown neighborhood and is significantly less impactful in size, scale, density and parking as would otherwise be permitted by state law.

K. Enhancing access to various public facilities by providing a transit -oriented development Project within walking distance to the future Downtown Bellflower Station for the proposed Southeast Gateway Line, Bellflower City Hall, the Los Angeles County Health Department, the Los Angeles County Library, and the Los Angeles County Superior Court.

L. The Project prevents the spread of blight in the downtown by reusing and repurposing the currently vacant former White's Funeral Home property. The Project enhances the appearance of the community through creative design of buildings, structures, and facilities.
-7-

City of Bellflower
Ordinance No. 1456

SECTION 9. Incorporation of Development Agreement; Changes; Execution.

In accordance with Government Code §§ 65864, et seq. this Ordinance approves the Development Agreement in substantially the form attached as "Exhibit A" and incorporated into this Ordinance by reference.

A. The DA may be changed before execution as authorized by the City Council during the public hearings for the Project.

B. The DA may be changed before execution for minor clarifications and technical, clerical, corrections as approved by the City Attorney including, without limitation, completion of references, status of planning approvals, and completion and conformity of all exhibits to the DA.

C. The City Council authorizes the Mayor to execute the DA on the City's behalf.

The City Manager, or designee, is authorized to execute amendments or operative memoranda as permitted by the DA, in a form approved by the City Attorney.

SECTION 10. Approval. Based on the foregoing, the City Council approves:
1) Zone Change Case No. ZC 25-02 to change the zoning designation from TODSP (Transit Oriented Development Specific Plan) to FSSP (Flower Street Specific Plan) for properties located on real property commonly known as 9855, 9903, and 9915 Flower Street as set forth in "Exhibit B," which is attached and incorporated by reference; and 2) Specific Plan Case No. SP 25-01 for Flower Street Specific Plan ("FSSP") as set forth in "Exhibit C," which is attached and incorporated by reference.

SECTION 11. Construction. This Ordinance must be broadly construed in order to achieve the purposes stated in this Ordinance. It is the City Council's intent that the provisions of this Ordinance be interpreted or implemented by the City and others in a manner that facilitates the purposes set forth in this Ordinance.

SECTION 12. Enforceability. Repeal of any provision of the BMC does not affect any penalty, forfeiture, or liability incurred before, or preclude prosecution and imposition of penalties for any violation occurring before this Ordinance's effective date. Any such repealed part will remain in full force and effect for sustaining action or prosecuting violations occurring before the effective date of this Ordinance.

SECTION 13. Reliance on Record. Each and every one of the findings and determinations in this Ordinance are based on the competent and substantial evidence, both oral and written, contained in the entire record relating to the matter. The determinations constitute the independent findings and determinations of the City Council in all respects and are fully and completely supported by substantial evidence in the record as a whole.

SECTION 14. Limitations. The City Council's analysis and evaluation of the Project is based on the best information currently available. It is inevitable that in evaluating a project that absolute and perfect knowledge of all possible aspects of the -8-

City of Bellflower
Ordinance No. 1456

Project will not exist. One of the major limitations on analysis of the Project is the City Council's lack of knowledge of future events. In all instances, best efforts have been made to form accurate assumptions. Somewhat related to this are the limitations on the City's ability to solve what are in effect regional, state, and national problems and issues. The City must work within the political framework within which it exists and with the limitations inherent in that framework.

SECTION 15. Severability. If any part of this Ordinance or its application is deemed invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, the City Council intends that such invalidity will not affect the effectiveness of the remaining provisions or applications and, to this end, the provisions of this Ordinance are severable.

SECTION 16. Electronic Signatures. This Ordinance may be executed with electronic signatures in accordance with Government Code §16.5. Such electronic signatures will be treated in all respects as having the same effect as an original signature.

SECTION 17. Recording. The City Clerk is directed to certify the passage and adoption of this Ordinance, cause it to be entered into the City of Bellflower's book of original ordinances, make a note of the passage and adoption in the records of this meeting, and, within fifteen days after the passage and adoption of this Ordinance, cause it to be published or posted in accordance with California law.

SECTION 18. Effective Date. This Ordinance becomes effective on the 30th day following its passage and adoption.
-9-

City of Bellflower
Ordinance No. 1456

ORDINANCE NO. 1456 HAD ITS FIRST READING ON APRIL 13, 2026, ITS SECOND READING ON APRIL 27, 2026, AND WAS DULY PASSED, APPROVED,

AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BELLFLOWER AT ITS REGULAR MEETING OF APRIL 27, 2026.

Sonny R. Santa Ines, Mayor
ATTEST:

Mayra Ochiqui, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Karl H. Berger, City Attorney

EXHIBITS
Exhibit A: Development Agreement File No. AFN 1125.1
Exhibit B: Zoning Map Amendment
Exhibit C: Flower Street Specific Plan
-10-

ATTACHMENT A

EXHIBIT A
Development Agreement File No. AFN 1125.1

RECORDING REQUESTED BY
AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:

CITY OF BELLFLOWER
16600 Civic Center Dr.

Bellflower, CA 90706
Attn: City Clerk

EXEMPT FROM RECORDING FEES PER
GOVERNMENT CODE §§6103, 27383,
27388.1(a)(2) (D)

SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN:

CITY OF BELLFLOWER AND BELLFLOWER 5 INV, LLC.

FOR THE FLOWER STREET DOWNTOWN HOUSING PROJECT
(AGREEMENT FILE NO. 1125.1)
APPROVAL DATE: APRIL 13, 2026
EFFECTIVE DATE:
1 -12-

AGREEMENT FILE NO. 1125.1

DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT

ROWER STREET DOWNTOWN HOUSING PROJECT
This Development Agreement (the "Agreement") is made as of April 13, 2026, by and between Bellflower 5 Inv, LLC, a California Limited Liability Company ("Owner"), and the City of Bellflower, a charter city and municipal corporation ("City") pursuant to Government Code §§ 65864, et seq.

City and Owner are referred to jointly within this Agreement as the "Parties" and individually as a "Party." The Parties agree as follows:

RECITALS
A. On November 18, 2024, Owner executed an Agreement of Purchase and Sale with Alderwoods Group (California), Inc. ("Seller") for the property at 9903 Flower Street, Bellflower, CA, and more particularly described in the attached Exhibit A, which is incorporated by reference (the "Site 1").

B. On November 27, 2024, City and Owner entered into a Loan Agreement for Owner's acquisition of Site 1., and City recorded a Deed of Trust with Assignment of Rents with the County of Los Angeles, Document Number 20240904213, providing the security for City's loan to Owner (the "Site 1 Loan Agreement").

C. On February 25, 2025, escrow for the Site 1 sale closed and fee simple title to Site 1 was transferred to Owner from Seller.

D. Site 1 includes one parcel located at 9903 Flower Street, APN 7109-013-033, on approximately 1.1.1 acres in Downtown Bellflower. Site 1 is located in Planning Area 5 of the Transit -Oriented Development Specific Plan.

E. On April 13, 2026 (the "Approval Date"), the City Council approved an Agreement of Purchase and Sale with Owner for the property at 9855 Flower Street, Bellflower, CA, and more particularly described in the attached Exhibit A, which is incorporated by reference (the "Site 2"). Together, Site 1 and Site 2 will be referred to within this Agreement as the "Property."
F. City and Owner reached mutual agreement and desire to voluntarily enter into this Agreement to facilitate development of the Property subject to the conditions and requirements set forth herein.

G. Government Code §§ 65864 through 65869.5 ("the "Development Agreement Statute") authorizes City to enter into binding development agreements with persons having legal or equitable interests in real property for the development of such property.

H. Owner's proposed development of the Property will be generally known as the Flower Street Downtown Housing Project and is generally described as an on -grade, 3 -story townhome project consisting of approximately 32 for sale residential units on Site 1 and 14 residential units on Site 2, as depicted on attached Exhibit B to this Agreement ("Project"). 1 -13-

I. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"), City prepared Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 25-01 to evaluate the Site 1 Project Approvals and this Agreement (the "Site 1 MND").

J. On the Approval Date, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing at which the City Council:
• Approved the Site 1 MND;
• Approved the Site 1 Project Approvals; and
• Adopted Ordinance No. 1456 approving this Agreement (the "Adopting Ordinance").

K. This Agreement is intended to be, and will be construed as, a development agreement within the meaning of the Development Agreement Statute and, in that connection, will, among other things, assure Owner that the Project can be completed in accordance with the Owner's Vested Right as defined below and for the uses and to the density and intensity of development set forth in the Project Approvals and this Agreement.

L. Development of the Project will further the comprehensive planning objectives contained within the General Plan and will result in public benefits, including, among others, the following:
• The Project is part of City's downtown and its revitalization is crucial for the economic revitalization of the downtown.
• The Project is located on underutilized property. Improving the property through private investment is a critical component of City's overall plan for a thriving downtown. • Providing housing which will help to satisfy City's obligation to meet City's share of regional housing needs.
• Fulfilling the long-term economic goals for City by providing housing to help offset the jobs/housing imbalance.
• Providing approximately 46 for -sale housing units to increase City's overall housing supply.
• The Project creates economic opportunity to City and all property tax collecting entities in that development of the Project will result in an increase of at least 15 percent of total property tax resulting from the Project at full implementation when compared to the year before the Property being acquired by City.
• Relieving pressure to build housing in existing neighborhoods. • Providing short-term construction employment within City. • Enhancing access to City's public recreational facilities by contributing toward a transit - oriented development Project within walking distance to a Class III bikeway, Library Garden Park, Town Center Plaza, Pirate Park, the Los Angeles County Health Department, the Los Angeles County Library, and the Mayne Events Center. 2 -14-

• Enhancing access to various public facilities by providing a transit -oriented development Project within walking distance to the future Downtown Bellflower Station for the proposed Southeast Gateway Line, Bellflower City Hall, the Los Angeles County Health Department, the Los Angeles County Library, and the Los Angeles County Superior Court. • The Project prevents the spread of blight in the downtown by reusing and repurposing the currently vacant former White's Funeral Home property. The Project enhances the appearance of the community through creative design of buildings, structures, and facilities.

AGREEMENT
The Parties agree as follows:

1. Defined Terms. Unless the contrary is stated or clearly appears from the context, the following definitions govern the construction of the words and phrases used in this Agreement:
a. "Adopting Ordinance" means the ordinance approving this Agreement. b. "Agreement" means this Development Agreement and any amendment properly approved and executed pursuant to Section 11 below.
c. "Approval Date" means the date on which the City Council conducted the first reading of the Adopting Ordinance. That date is April 13, 2026. d. "City" means the City of Bellflower, California.
e. "Day" means a calendar day unless specifically stated as a "business day." f. "Default" means the material and substantial failure by a Party to timely meet that Party's obligations under this Agreement.
"Development Approvals" means all non -legislative permits, entitlements, and other approvals granted or issued by the City for the use of, construction upon, and/or development of the Property, including revisions, addenda, amendments, and modifications to these actions. Development Approvals include, but are not limited to, the following actions,
• Development Review;
• Tentative and final subdivision maps;
• Certificates of compliance, lot line adjustments, and boundary adjustments; • Density bonuses and related concessions, waivers, and incentives; • Site development permits;
• Site plan and architectural review;
• Grading, demolition, building, and occupancy permits; g.
3 -15-

• Sewer and water connection permits and agreements;
• Environmental review (e.g., CEQA) documents for the Project; and • Street, drainage, utility, stormwater, landscape permits, and other improvement permits and agreements.

Development Approvals do not include Land Use Regulations, which are defined below.
h. "Development Plan" means the complete development ofthe Project pursuant to the Existing Land Use Regulations, the Existing Development Approvals, the Subsequent Land Use Regulations to which Owner has consented in writing, Subsequent Development Approvals, and this Agreement.
i. "Effective Date" means the date on which the Adopting Ordinance becomes operative under Government Code Section 36937. Note that the "Effective Date" is not the same as the "Approval Date."
j. "Exhibit" means an exhibit attached to this Agreement, unless otherwise specified.

All Exhibits are deemed incorporated within this Agreement. k. "Existing Land Use Regulations" means all Land Use Regulations in effect on the Approval Date, including the General Plan and applicable zoning. Changes to Land Use Regulations occurring between the Approval Date and the Effective Date will not be considered part of the Existing Land Use Regulations without Owner's prior written consent.

I. "General Plan" means the general plan of the City.
m. "Include" and its derivatives such as "including" will be deemed to incorporate the phrases "without limitation," "but not limited to," and their grammatically correct equivalents, unless specifically set forth as "includes only" or an equivalent phrase. n. "Land Use Regulations" means all applicable law governing the development and use of real property. Land Use Regulations include the General Plan and the Bellflower Municipal Code. Land Use Regulations do not apply to City's enforcement of the uniform codes regulating building or construction standards which will apply to the Project at the time City issues building permits.
o. "Map" means Vesting Tentative Map No. 84789.
p. "Owner" means Bellflower 5 Inv, LLC, a California Limited Liability Company, and its respective successors and assigns with respect to all or any portion of the Property or this Agreement.
"Owner's Vested Right" means Owner's property right to develop the Property as set forth in this Agreement.
q.
r. The "Parties" means the City and Owner. A "Party" means either the City or Owner. 4 -16-

s. "Periodic Review" means the City's review of Owner's good faith compliance with the terms of this Agreement pursuant to Government Code Section 65865.1, as set forth in Section 12 below.
t. "Project" means the development of the Property to the full extent set forth in Owner's Vested Right.
u. "Project Approvals" means the Site 1 Approvals and any Subsequent Development Approvals, including Development Approvals for Site 2.
v. The "Property" means the real property described in Exhibit A. w. "Public Benefits" means those benefits provided to the City by Owner and the Project as set forth on Exhibit E.
x. "Qualified Lender" means a party who holds a mortgage, deed of trust, or other security device to secure financing related to the Property or the Project, as more fully addressed in Section 16 below.
y. "Site 1" means the property located at 9903 Flower Street, Bellflower, CA, and more particularly described in Exhibit A.
z. "Site 1 Approvals" means the following Development Approvals and Land Use Regulations approved by the City Council on the Approval Date:
• General Plan Amendment Case No. GPA 25-02;
• Zone Change Case No. ZC 25-02;
• Specific Plan Case No. 25-01;
• Development Review Case No. DR 3-25-16185; and
• Vesting Tentative Map No. TM 84789 (the "Map").
aa. "Site 1 Loan Agreement" means the Loan Agreement for Owner's acquisition of Site 1 which is referenced in Recital B.
bb. "Site 2" means the property located at 9855 Flower Street, Bellflower, CA, and more particularly described in Exhibit A.
cc. "Subsequent Development Approvals" means all Development Approvals for the Project which are approved, granted, or issued after the Approval Date and which are required or permitted by the Existing Land Use Regulations, the Subsequent Land Use Regulations to which Owner has consented in writing, and this Agreement. dd. "Subsequent Land Use Regulations" means those Land Use Regulations which are both adopted and effective after the Approval Date and which are not incorporated within the definition of Existing Land Use Regulations. ee. "Map" means Vesting Tentative Map No. 84789 which was approved for the Project on April 13, 2026, and any amendments to Vesting Tentative Map No. 84789. ff. "Term" means the term of this Agreement as set forth in Section 2 below. 5 -17-

2. Term of Agreement. This Agreement commences upon the later of (i) the Effective Date and (ii) the date on which the Agreement of Purchase and Sale for Site 2 referenced in Recital E is executed by the Parties. The Term is 15 years, unless the Term is modified by mutual written consent of the City and Owner. Upon the expiration of the Term, this Agreement is terminated.

3. Public Benefits. Development of the Project will further the comprehensive planning objectives contained within the General Plan and will result in public benefits, including, among others, those set forth in Exhibit E.

4. Vested Right to Develop the Project. Owner will have the vested right to complete development of the Project on the Property to the full extent and in the manner provided in the Development Plan and this Agreement ("Owner's Vested Right"). Owner's Vested Right and this Agreement are intended to limit, to the degree specified in this Agreement and permitted under State law, the City's ability to regulate development of the Project and the Property during the Term.
a. Permitted Uses and Development Standards. During the Term, Owner may construct the Project on the Property in accordance with the Development Plan. b. Implementing Actions. To enable Owner to complete the Project consistent with Owner's Vested Right, the City agrees that it will:
• Timely process all Subsequent Development Approvals and Subsequent Land Use Regulations needed, in Owner's judgment, to implement development of the Project and consistent with the Development Plan; and • Take such other actions that are requested by Owner and consistent with the terms of this Agreement.
c. Vested Rights Upon Termination. Termination of this Agreement does not invalidate any Land Use Regulations or terminate any Development Approvals obtained prior to the date of termination.
d. City's Reserved Powers. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, Owner's Vested Right and the development of the Property will be subject to the following regulations:
• Processing Fees and Charges. Processing fees and charges required by City and applied uniformly in connection with new construction citywide. Processing fees and charges do not include Development Impact Fees.
• Procedural Regulations. Procedural regulations relating to hearing bodies, petitions, applications, notices, findings, records, hearings, reports, recommendations, appeals, and any other matter of procedure. • Uniform Codes. Those Uniform Codes adopted by reference in the BMC in accordance with Government Code §§ 50022.2, et seq. as required by applicable law including, without limitation, Health and Safety Code §§18944.5 and Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations. The Uniform Codes govern building and 6 -18-

construction standards including, without limitation, the building, plumbing, electrical, mechanical, grading, sign, and fire standards. • Health and Safety Regulations. Regulations reasonably necessary to protect persons from conditions dangerous to their health and/or safety, provided that the regulation constitutes a valid exercise of the City's police power, is based upon findings of necessity established by a preponderance of evidence, and is applied and enforced in a uniform, consistent, and nondiscriminatory manner so as not to primarily or disproportionately impact the Project. To the extent possible, any such regulations will be applied and construed so as to provide Owner with the rights and assurances provided under this Agreement.

5. Timing of Development. The California Supreme Court held in Pardee Construction Co. v.

City of Camarillo, 37 Cal. 3d 465 (1984), that the failure of the parties in that case to provide for the timing of development resulted in a later -adopted initiative restricting the timing of development to prevail over the parties' agreement. Therefore, subject to the Schedule of Performance set forth in Subsection a below, the Parties provide that with respect to the timing of the Project's development, Owner will have the right, but not the obligation, to (i) develop the Property and (ii) do so in such order and at such rate and at such times as Owner deems appropriate, all within the exercise of Owner's subjective business judgment. a. Schedule of Performance. The Parties each will timely complete their respective tasks set forth in Exhibit D. Adhering to the Schedule of Performance is a material inducement for City to execute this Agreement. For good cause, either Party may grant the other Party an extension of time to perform that Party's Exhibit D tasks. The City Manager may determine good cause for City. Such determination may be appealed to the City Council by Owner.

Should a Party default in its performance of any obligation under this Agreement which delays or prevents the other Party from timely performing its Exhibit D tasks, the time for the non -defaulting Party to perform those Exhibit D tasks will be extended. The extension will be for a time reasonably reflecting the consequences of the delay or prevention, but in no event less than the length of delay resulting from the default. A failure by a Party to timely complete an Exhibit D task is subject to the Notice and Cure provisions in Section 13 below.

Unless the Parties mutually agree otherwise, any extension of time to perform a Exhibit D task will extend the time to perform all subsequent Exhibit D tasks.

Should Owner fail to timely complete an Exhibit D task, and subject to the Notice and Cure provisions in Section 13 below, the same will constitute a material breach under Section 5.14 of the Site 1 Loan Agreement, and City may exercise its rights under Section 5.14 (Task Schedule) of the Site 1 Loan Agreement. If a separate loan agreement related to the purchase of Site 2 has been signed by Parties and contains a provision substantially the same as Section 5.14 of the Site 1 Loan Agreement, City may also exercise its rights under that provision of the separate loan agreement.

6. Development, Impact, Processing, and Other Fees.
7 -19-

a. Project Impact Fees. Owner takes notice pursuant to Government Code § 66020(d) that City is imposing exactions upon the Project in accordance with the Mitigation Fee Act (Government Code §§ 66000, et seq.). Owner is informed that it may protest exactions in accordance with Government Code § 66020. Owner will pay only those Mitigation Fee Act exactions in effect as of the Approval Date.

Owner will pay the following development impact fees:

Notwithstanding the above, Owner will pay and waives any right of protest to the following fees:
b. $700,000 as the Project's Parks and Recreation Fee, to be used towards improvements to Friendship Plaza and Pirate Park with any excess unused amounts to be allocated toward other qualified park development impact fee projects. • $54,510 as the Project's Public and General Government Facilities Fee. • $8,490 as the Project's Public Safety Fee.

These fees will be paid on a per residential unit basis by construction phase, meaning that fees for residential units within a phase of construction will be paid when the Building Official issues the certificate of occupancy for the residential units in that phase.

Owner will incorporate Public Art in a form and on a site mutually agreeable to Owner and City Council or alternatively pay the associated fee established pursuant to BMC Section 3.32.040.

Nothing in this Agreement precludes City and Owner from entering into reimbursement agreements for the portion, if any, of the cost of any dedications, public facilities and/or infrastructure that City required as conditions of the Project Approvals, to the extent that they exceed those reasonably necessary to mitigate the impacts of the Project.
c. Reimbursement Agreements. Nothing in this Agreement precludes City and Owner from entering into reimbursement agreements for the portion, if any, of the cost of any dedications, public facilities and/or infrastructure required by conditions of the Project Approvals, to the extent that they exceed those reasonably necessary to mitigate the impacts of the Project.
d. Applicable Fees. Owner is obligated to pay those fees, charges, exactions and assessments, including dedications and improvements, as are set forth in the Existing Land Use Regulations, the Project Approvals, including the Conditions of Approval, and this Agreement.
e. Limitation on Increase in Project Impact Fees. Any increase in any Project Impact Fee described in Subsection a above will apply to Owner, the Property, or the Project only to the extent that the fee increase is applied consistently and proportionately to all development projects within the City.
8 -20-

7. Term of Map(s) and Other Project Approvals. The term of the Map and other Project Approvals is governed by applicable law, the Project Approvals, and this Agreement.

8. Other Governmental Permits and Fees. The City will cooperate with Owner's efforts to obtain such other permits and approvals as may be required by or from other governmental or quasi -governmental agencies with jurisdiction over the Project in connection with the Development Plan.

9. Nexus/Reasonable Relationship Challenges. Owner waives any rights it may have now or in the future to challenge the legal validity of, the conditions, requirements, policies or programs that comprise the Development Plan and/or this Agreement. This waiver includes, without limitation, claims for an abuse of the police power, a violation of substantive due process, a denial of equal protection of the laws, a taking of property without payment of just compensation, or the imposition of an unlawful tax.

10. State and Federal Laws.
a. State and Federal Fees. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, if, after the Effective Date, a state or federal law or regulation is adopted which requires the City to impose a fee upon Owner, Owner will pay that fee. This provision does not apply if the City's imposition of that fee upon Owner is not mandatory. b. Changes in Federal and State Law. The Property may be subject to subsequently enacted state or federal laws or regulations that conflict with the Development Plan.

Upon discovery of such a subsequently enacted federal or state law, City or Owner will provide the other Party with written notice containing a copy of the state or federal law or regulation and a written explanation of the legal or regulatory conflict created. Within ten (10) days after receipt of that notice, City and Owner will meet and confer in good faith in a reasonable attempt to modify this Agreement, as necessary, to comply with such federal or state law or regulation. In such negotiations, City and Owner agree to preserve the terms of this Agreement and the Owner's Vested Right to the maximum feasible extent while resolving the conflict. City agrees to cooperate with Owner in resolving the conflict in a manner which minimizes any financial impact to Owner. Any delays caused by such changes in state or federal law will be considered delays beyond the control of City or Owner pursuant to Section 15 below.

11. Modification or Cancellation by Mutual Consent. The following provisions will govern the amendment and/or cancellation of this Agreement (collectively, an "Amendment"):
a. General. Pursuant to the Development Agreement Statute, an Amendment may occur through the mutual written consent of the Parties or their respective successors in interest.
b. Amendments of Development Plan. A change in the Development Plan does not require an Amendment if Owner provides written consent to the change. c. Minor Changes. The provisions of this Agreement require a close degree of cooperation between the Parties and "Minor Changes" to the Project may be required 9 -21-

from time to time to accommodate design changes, engineering changes, and other refinements related to the details of the Parties' performance. "Minor Changes" means changes to the Project that are otherwise consistent with the Bellflower Municipal Code and the General Plan and do not result in a change in the type of use of the Property, a material increase in the density or intensity of use, significant new or increased environmental impacts that cannot be mitigated, or violations of any applicable health and safety regulations in effect on the Approval Date. d. Operating Memoranda. The Parties acknowledge that the provisions of the Agreement require a close degree of cooperation and that new information and future events may demonstrate that changes are appropriate with respect to the details of performance of the Parties under this Agreement. The Parties desire, therefore, to retain a certain degree of flexibility with respect to the details of performance for those items covered in general terms under this Agreement. If and when, from time to time, the Parties find that refinements or adjustments are desirable, such refinements or adjustments will be accomplished through operating memoranda or implementation agreements approved by the Parties which, after execution, will be attached to this Agreement as addenda and become a part hereof. e. Execution of Memoranda. Operating memoranda or implementation agreements may be executed on behalf of City by the City Manager and the City Attorney. In the event a particular subject requires notice or hearing, such notice or hearing will be appropriately given. Any significant modification to the terms of performance under this Agreement will be processed as an amendment of this Agreement in accordance with this Agreement and must be approved by the City Council.

12. Periodic Review. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65865.1, at least once during every twelve (12) month period of the Term, City will review the good faith compliance of Owner with the terms of this Agreement ("Periodic Review").
a. Standards for Periodic Review. During the Periodic Review, Owner is required to demonstrate good faith compliance with the terms of this Agreement. Good faith compliance is established if Owner is not in Default under this Agreement. If the City Council or its designee finds and determines, based on substantial evidence, that Owner is in Default, then, before taking further action to terminate this Agreement or file suit against Owner, the City must first comply with this Agreement, including the conduct of a final City Council hearing. In any legal action by Owner challenging the City's determination of Default, the court will conduct a de novo review of Owner's compliance based on the administrative record and determine if the preponderance of evidence supports the City's determination.
b. Procedures for Periodic Review. City will provide Owner at least 60 days' notice of any date scheduled for a Periodic Review. Such notice will identify the last date on which information may be submitted to City to be considered by the City Council regarding the Periodic Review. Owner is not limited in the information it presents to the City Council for the Periodic Review. Owner may, if needed, provide information to the City Council in the first instance at the City Council hearing on the Periodic Review. 10 -22-

c. Certificate of Compliance. At any time during any year that the City Council determines that Owner is not in Default under this Agreement, City will, upon written request by Owner, provide Owner with a written certificate of good faith compliance within fifteen business days after receiving that request.

13. Default by Owner. A Default by Owner is limited to the material and substantial failure by Owner to timely meet Owner's obligations under this Agreement. This scope of a Default is not intended to expand or limit the legal definition of materiality, but rather to establish the limited nature of a default which may lead to an early termination of this Agreement. a. Notice and Cure. Before the City may declare a Default or a termination of this Agreement or bring a legal action to terminate this Agreement, the procedures of this Section must be followed. In the case of a Default arising from the conduct of a Periodic Review, the procedures of this Section must be strictly followed and constitute a second and independent review of the good faith compliance of Owner.

The City must assert a Default by providing written notice to Owner setting forth the nature of the Default and the actions, if any, required by Owner to cure the Default.

Owner is in Default if Owner fails to cure the Default within thirty days after the date of such notice (for monetary defaults) or within sixty days after the date of such notice (for non -monetary defaults). If the nature of the alleged Default is such that it cannot reasonably be cured within the applicable cure period, Owner is not in Default if it has commenced efforts to cure the Default within the applicable cure period and continues to diligently pursue completion of the cure.
b. Final City Council Review. If, after complying with the notice and cure provisions, the City continues to allege that Owner is in Default, then, before seeking a judicial remedy, the City Council must conduct a final hearing on the existence of a Default using the procedures for the Periodic Review set forth above. c. Standard of Review. Because of the potentially severe consequences of a Default and the need for appropriate due process before this Agreement may be terminated, any determination by the City Council that Owner is in Default must be based upon the preponderance of evidence before the City Council.
d. Remedies for Owner's Default. If City complies with this Agreement in determining a Default exists, it may then, as its sole option, institute legal action to terminate this Agreement. In any legal action by Owner challenging the City's determination of Default, the court will conduct a de novo review of Owner's compliance based on the administrative record and determine if the preponderance of evidence supports the City Council's determination.

14. City Defaults / Limited Remedies. If the City is in Default, Owner's remedies are limited to bringing an action for mandamus to compel the City to perform its obligations and/or to remedy the consequences to Owner of the failure of the City's material representations. If, and only if, the City fails to comply with a judgment of a court requiring the performance of specific acts by the City, Owner may then sue City for the non-performance of its obligations.
11 -23-

15. Delay for Events Beyond the Parties' Control. Neither Party is in default where failure or delay in performance of any of its obligations under this Agreement is beyond the Party's control. Examples of such events include acts of nature (such as fire, mud, rain, floods, earthquakes), pandemics, enactment of new conflicting or state laws or regulations (such as the listing of a species as threatened or endangered), judicial actions (such as the issuance of restraining orders and injunctions), damage to work in process by reason of riots, strikes, significant vandalism, or other similar occurrences, the discovery and remediation of environmental contamination not identified on a Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment during due diligence, and national economic recessions adversely affecting the homebuilding industry. If any such events will occur, both the time for performance by the delayed Party and the Term will be extended for a period equal to the time of the delay.

16. Lender Protection Provisions.
a. Discretion to Encumber. This Agreement does not prevent or limit Owner, in any manner, at Owner's sole discretion, from encumbering some or all of the Property or any improvement on the Property by any mortgage, deed of trust, or other security device to secure financing related to the Property or the Project. b. Notice of Default. Any notice of any default by Owner which is provided to Owner pursuant to this Agreement will also be sent to any lender that has made a loan then secured by a deed of trust against all or a portion of the Property, provided that the lender has first given the City written notice of the lender's election to receive copies of default notices and provided to the City a recorded copy of its applicable deed of trust. Any lender that has taken these steps is referred to within this Agreement as a "Qualified Lender." A Qualified Lender does not include the maker of a loan solely to the owner of a single family residential unit within the Property. c. Right of a Qualified Lender to Cure a Default. If Owner fails to timely cure any default under this Agreement within the time periods set forth in this Agreement, then the City will send a written notice of that failure to each Qualified Lender. After receiving that notice, each Qualified Lender may cure any such default on the same terms as Owner. The Qualified Lender's time in which to commence a cure begins on the date of its receipt of the written notice. If the nature of the default is such that a Qualified Lender cannot reasonably cure the default without being the owner of all or the applicable portion of the Property, the Qualified Lender is deemed to be diligently pursuing the cure of any such default if the Qualified Lender is proceeding to foreclose the lien of its deed of trust against all or the applicable portion of the Property and after completing that foreclosure promptly commences the cure of the default and thereafter diligently pursues that cure to completion.
d. No Impairment of Development Agreement to Mortgage. A default by Owner does not subordinate, invalidate or defeat the lien of any mortgage held by a lender.

Neither a breach of any obligation secured by any mortgage held by a lender or other lien against the mortgaged interest, nor a judicial foreclosure, trustee's sale, or acceptance of a deed in lieu of foreclosure (collectively, a "Foreclosure") under any mortgage or other lien, will defeat, diminish, render invalid or unenforceable, or 12 -24-

otherwise impair Owner's rights or obligations, or constitute a default, under this Agreement. In no event will a Foreclosure or other exercise by a lender of its pre- or post -Foreclosure rights in connection with a mortgage require any consent or approval by the City.
e. Lender's Obligations with Respect to the Property. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Agreement, no lender will have any obligations or other liabilities under this Agreement unless and until that lender acquires title to the portion of the Property that was subject to the applicable mortgage. Further, no lender will have any obligations or liabilities under this Agreement solely because it holds a mortgage or an interest in Owner.

17. Recordation of this Agreement. City will record this Agreement with the Los Angeles County Recorder within ten days after the Effective Date. The failure of the City to sign and/or record this Agreement does not affect the validity of this Agreement.

All of the provisions, agreements, rights, powers, standards, terms, covenants and obligations contained in this Agreement are binding upon the Parties and their respective heirs, successors by merger, consolidation, or otherwise and assigns, devisees, administrators, representatives, lessees, and all other persons or entities acquiring the Property, any lot, parcel or any portion thereof, or any interest therein, whether by sale, operation of law or in any manner whatsoever, and inure to the benefit of the Parties and their respective heirs, successors by merger, consolidation or otherwise and assigns. All of the provisions of this Agreement are enforceable during the Term hereof as equitable servitudes and constitute covenants running with the land pursuant to applicable law including, without limitation, Civil Code § 1468.

18. No Third Party Beneficiaries. This Agreement is entered into for the sole benefit of the Parties and their respective successors and assigns. No other person or entity has any right of action based upon any provision of this Agreement.

19. Owner's Right to Assign. Owner may:
a. Make a sale, lease, assignment, or other conveyance (collectively, a "Conveyance") of all or any portion of the Property (the "Transferred Property"); b. Assign some or all of its rights, title, and interest in and to this Agreement (the "Transferred Rights") to one or more persons or entities (a "Transferee"); and c. Delegate to a Transferee obligations under this Agreement (the "Delegated Obligations").

In any such Conveyance, the scope of Transferred Rights and Delegated Obligations must correspond to the rights and obligations applicable to the Transferred Property. Owner must give written notice to City after the completion of a Conveyance and concurrently deliver to the City a fully executed Assignment and Assumption Agreement between Owner and the Transferee which identifies the Transferred Property, itemizes any Transferred Rights and Delegated Obligations, and includes the Transferee's written acceptance of the Transferred Rights and assumption of the Delegated Obligations. The Assignment and 13 -25-

Assumption Agreement must be substantially in the form of Exhibit D or such other form as mutually agreed upon by the Parties.

Upon recordation of the deed conveying title to the Transferred Property to the Transferee and delivery to the City of the fully executed Assignment and Assumption Agreement (the date of delivery to be the "Transfer Date"), the Transferee will succeed to the Transferred Rights and will assume the Delegated Obligations. At that time, Owner will have no further rights or obligations under this Agreement with respect to the applicable Transferred Property, except for any such rights and obligations that accrued before the Transfer Date.

20. City's Consent. Except as otherwise provided for selling or leasing individual lots or homes, City's consent is not required for a transfer between Owner and a third party unless, at the time of the Assignment, Owner is determined to be in Default and the Default has not been cured. If Owner is in Default, City must consent to any Assignment which provides adequate security to City, in the reasonable exercise of City's discretion, to guarantee the cure of the Default upon completion of the Assignment.

21. Sale or Lease of Individual Lots or Homes. Upon sale or lease of an individual lot or home to an end user the acquiring or leasing party will be deemed to have no obligations under this Agreement and the individual lot is no longer be subject to or burdened by this Agreement.

22. Third Party Challenges; Defense and Indemnity. In the event of any administrative, legal or equitable action or other proceeding instituted by any person or entity not a party to the Agreement challenging the validity of any provision of this Agreement, challenging any agreement between City and other government agencies entered into at the request of Owner to facilitate the development of the Project Site, challenging any of the Project Approvals, or challenging the sufficiency of any environmental review of either this Agreement or any Project Approval under CEQA (each a "Third Party Challenge"), each Party must cooperate in the defense of such Third Party Challenge, in accordance with this Section.

In Tight of the Parties' mutual interests in successfully defending against a Third Party Challenge, all communications between Owner and City concerning a Third Party Challenge must be kept confidential and cannot be disclosed by either Party without the written consent of the other Party.

Owner agrees to pay City's costs of defending a Third Party Challenge, including all court costs and reasonable attorneys' fees expended by City including the time and cost of the City Attorney in defense of any Third Party Action, as well as the time of City's staff spent in connection with such defense. Owner may select its own legal counsel to represent Owner's interests in any Third Party Challenge at Owner's sole cost and expense. City agrees that it will not enter into a settlement agreement to any Third Party Challenge without Owner's written consent. Owner's obligation to pay City's costs in the defense of a Third Party Challenge does not extend to those costs incurred on appeal unless otherwise authorized by Owner in writing. If Owner elects, in its sole and absolute discretion, not to contest such litigation challenges, City does not have any obligation to contest such 14 -26-

challenges. If City elects to contest such challenges after Owner elects not to contest, City will do so at its sole cost.

The provisions of this Section will apply only in the event of a legal or equitable action or other proceeding, before a court of competent jurisdiction, instituted by any person or entity not a party to this Agreement challenging the applicability to the Project or Project Site of a conflicting City law (a "Third Party Enforcement Action"). In the event of a Third Party Enforcement Action, City must promptly notify Owner of such action or proceeding, and cooperate with Owner so as to most effectively respond to the Third Party Enforcement Action. In no event will City take any action that would frustrate, hinder, or otherwise complicate Owner's efforts to respond.

The Parties agree to cooperate, to the maximum extent permitted by law, in the defense of such action or proceeding. For purposes of this Section, the required cooperation between the Parties includes, without limitation, developing litigation strategies, preparing litigation briefs and other related documents, conferring on all aspects of the litigation, developing settlement strategies, and, to the extent permitted by law, jointly making significant decisions related to the relevant litigation, throughout the course thereof.

City's costs of defending any Third Party Enforcement Action, including all court costs, and reasonable attorneys' fees expended by City including the time and cost of the City Attorney in defense of any Third Party Enforcement Action, as well as the time of City's staff spent in connection with such defense, will be paid in accordance with this Agreement.

In no event will such costs extend to, nor will Owner or the Project be obligated to pay, any costs incurred on appeal unless otherwise authorized by Owner in writing.

City must not enter into a settlement agreement or take any other action to resolve any Third Party Enforcement Action without Owner's written consent. City cannot, without Owner's written consent, take any action that would frustrate, hinder or otherwise prevent Owner's efforts to settle or otherwise resolve any Third Party Enforcement Action.

Provided that City complies with this Section and provided that Owner is a party to the relevant Third Party Enforcement Action, Owner agrees to be bound by any final judgment arising out of a Third Party Enforcement Action and further agrees that no default under this Agreement will arise if such final judgment requires City to apply to the Project or Project Site a City law that conflicts with applicable law or this Agreement.

Owner must defend and indemnify City from and against any and all damages, claims, costs and liabilities arising out of the personal injury or death of any third party, or damage to the property of any third party, to the extent such damages, claims, costs or liabilities result from the construction of the Project by Owner or by Owner's contractors, subcontractors, agents or employees. Nothing in this Section will be construed to mean that Owner must defend or indemnify City from or against any damages, claims, costs or liabilities arising from, or alleged to arise from, activities associated with the maintenance or repair by City or any other public agency of improvements that have been offered for dedication and accepted by City or such other public agency or for any other public improvements constructed by City or constructed by Owner at direction of City. City and Owner may from 15 -27-

time to time enter into subdivision improvement agreements, as authorized by the Subdivision Map Act, which agreements may include defense and indemnity provisions different from those contained in this Section. In the event of any conflict between such provisions in any such subdivision improvement agreement and the provisions set forth above, the provisions of such subdivision improvement agreement will prevail. This Section will sunset and have no further force or effect on the date that is ten years after termination of this Agreement.

23. Miscellaneous Provisions.
a. Notices. All notices which are allowed or required to be given under this Agreement ("Notices") must be in writing and are given and received when personally delivered or when deposited in the United States mail, with postage prepaid, to be sent by registered or certified mail or overnight mail service, addressed as set forth below and deemed received on the second business day after such mailing.

The addresses for Notices are as follows and may be changed by delivery of a Notice to these addresses:

If to City:
with a copy to:

If to Owner:

City of Bellflower
Attn: Ryan Smoot, City Manager
16600 Civic Center Drive
Bellflower, CA 90706
Karl H. Berger
City Attorney
444 South Flower Street
40th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90071
Bellflower 5 Inv, LLC
Attn: Michelle Thrakulchavee
3121 Michelson Drive, Suite 150
Irvine, CA 92612
with a copy to: Tim Paone
Cox Castle & Nicholson LLP
3121 Michelson Drive, Suite 200
Irvine, CA 92612
b. Severability. If any part of this Agreement is declared invalid for any reason, such invalidity does not affect the validity of the rest of this Agreement, provided that the Owner's Vested Right and the Public Benefits are not materially diminished. c. Entire Agreement. This Agreement represents the entire agreement between the Parties and supersedes all prior agreements and understandings, whether oral or written, between the Parties.
16 -28-

g•
d. Interpretation. This Agreement has been reviewed and revised by legal counsel for both Owner and City, and no presumption or rule that ambiguities will be construed against the drafting party applies to the interpretation or enforcement of this Agreement, which will be interpreted and enforced according to the plain meaning thereof.
e. Not Acting as Agents. In entering into and performing under this Agreement, each of the Parties is acting as an independent entity and not as an agent of the other in any respect. Nothing contained within this Agreement or in any document executed in connection with this Agreement shall be construed as making the City and Owner joint venturers, partners, or employer/employee.
f. Waiver. There are no implied waivers. All waivers of performance must be in a writing signed by the Party granting the waiver. Failure by a Party to insist upon the strict performance of any provision of this Agreement, irrespective of the length of time for which such failure continues, is not a waiver of the right to demand strict compliance with the same or any other provision of this Agreement in the future.

Time of Essence. Time is of the essence of this Agreement, and all performances required under this Agreement must be completed within the time periods specified. h. Estoppel Certificate. Within ten business days following a written request by Owner, City will execute and deliver to Owner an "Estoppel Certificate" certifying that:
• Either this Agreement is unmodified and in full force and effect or there have been specified (date and nature) modifications to the Agreement, but it remains in full force and effect as modified; and
• Either (i) there are no known current uncured defaults or Defaults under this Agreement or (ii) City alleges that specified (date and nature) defaults or Defaults exist.

The Estoppel Certificate also will provide any other reasonable information requested.

The failure to timely deliver this statement constitutes a conclusive presumption that this Agreement is in full force and effect without modification, except as may be represented by the Owner, and that there are no uncured defaults or Defaults in the performance of Owner, except as may be represented by Owner. Owner must pay to City all reasonable administrative costs incurred by City in connection with the issuance of an Estoppel Certificate before City issues the Estoppel Certificate.

Choice of Law; Venue. This Agreement must be interpreted under the laws of the State of California. Any legal action pertaining to this Agreement must be filed and heard in a court of competent jurisdiction in Los Angeles County. j. Counterparts. This Agreement may be signed in as many as four duplicate counterparts. Each full set of counterparts constitutes a single original. k. Successors and Assigns. This Agreement binds and inures to the benefit of the successors and assigns of Owner in the Property.
17 -29-

I. Exhibits. This Agreement includes attached Exhibits A through E, which are incorporated by reference. The following exhibits are attached to this Agreement:
• Exhibit A — Legal Description of the Property
• Exhibit B — Site Plans and Project Description
• Exhibit C — Form of Assignment and Assumption Agreement • Exhibit D— Schedule of Performance
• Exhibit E — Public Benefits
This Agreement has been signed by the Parties on the dates indicated below. "CITY"

CITY OF BELLFLOWER,
a municipal corporation
By: Sonny R. Santa Ines
Mayor
ATTEST:

By: Mayra Ochiqui
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

By: Karl H. Berger
City Attorney
18 -30-

"OWNER"
BELLFLOWER 5 INV, LLC,
a California limited liability company
By:

Printed Name:

Its:
19 -31-

A notary public or other officer completing this
certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is
attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or
validity of that document.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
)§
County of
On , before me, a
Notary Public, personally appeared who proved to me on
the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct
WITNESS my hand and official seal.

Signature of Notary
(Affix seal here)
20 -32-

A notary public or other officer completing this
certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is
attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or
validity of that document.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
)§
County of
On , before me, a
Notary Public, personally appeared who proved to me on
the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct
WITNESS my hand and official seal.

Signature of Notary
(Affix seal here)
21 -33-

EXHIBIT A

LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY
SITE 1: 9903 FLOWER STREET

THE LAND REFERED TO HEREIN BELOW IS SITUATED IN THE CITY OF BELLFLOWER, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

THE EAST 50 FEET OF LOT 25 AND ALL OF LOT 26 IN BLOCK 25 OF TRACT NO. 3557,

IN THE CITY OF BELLFLOWER, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 38, PAGE 69 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY.

APN: 7109-013-033
SITE 2: 9855 FLOWER STREET

THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN IS SITUATED IN THE CITY OF BELLFLOWER, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

THE WEST 77 FEET OF LOT 25, IN BLOCK 25 OF TRACT 3557, IN THE CITY OF

BELLFLOWER, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 38 PAGE(S) 69, OF MAPS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY.

APN: 7109-013-904
-34-

EXHIBIT B

SITE PLANS AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION
[DRAFT, to be updated, as needed, after Project Approvals] Site 1— 9903 Flower Street
LEGEND
' Pao
P.2
@mSoo -Camm
ETbT/W EASEMENTS
TS
.a<w.oaou�am

PPCPCSED EASEMENTS
2 aemv.®llKamm tows wawa
� orcanaaar
o.a:cll v.mr
Site Plan. Site 1 consists of four new buildings that are 11,572 square feet each with a total of 32 condominium units and a total floor area of 46,288 net square feet. Each building consists of three levels.

Floor Plan. There are two different floor plans (referred to as Plan 1 and Plan 2). Plan 1 would total 16 units with each unit consisting of 1,335 net square feet and 3 bedrooms and 3 bathrooms. Plan 2 would total 16 units with each unit consisting of 1,558 net square feet and 3 bedrooms and 3 bathrooms with an optional 4th bedroom.

Amenities. Amenities total 11,956 square feet of open space. This includes 10,228 square feet of common open space and 1,728 square feet of private open space. All individual units have private open space that consists of 46 square feet of private (deck) space for Plan 1 and 62 square feet of private (deck) space for Plan 2. Other amenities would include a paseo and a lawn with benches.

Parking and Access. On -site parking consists of two spaces for each of the 32 condominium units for a total of 64 parking spaces. Vehicular access is provided by a 26 -foot -wide driveway connection located at the southeast corner of 9903 Flower Street and connects to two internal drive aisles.
-35-

EXHIBIT C

FORM OF ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION AGREEMENT
THIS ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is entered into as of the day of , 20_, by and among , a
("Assignor") and , a

RECITALS
("Assignee").

A. Assignor entered into a Development Agreement ("DA") with the City of Bellflower, California, on , 2026, with respect to property located at 9903 Flower Street in the City (APN 7109-013-033) (the "Property"). The DA was recorded in the Official Records of Los Angeles County on (Document Number ).

C. Assignor is the fee owner of the Property. The Property is more particularly described in Exhibit 1 to this Agreement ("Property").

D. Assignor desires to transfer its interest in the Property to Assignee as of the Effective Date of this Agreement (see Section 12 below) and Assignor desires to so acquire such interest in the Property from Assignor.

E. Assignor desires to assign to Assignee and Assignee desires to assume, without qualification, all rights and obligations of Assignor under the DA with respect to the Property.

Upon execution of this Agreement and transfer to Assignee of legal title to the Property, Assignor desires to be released from any and all obligations under the DA with respect to the Property.

AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, Assignor and Assignee hereby agree as follows:

1. Assignment by Assignor. Assignor hereby assigns, transfers and grants to Assignee, and its successors and assigns, all of Assignor's rights, title and interest and obligations, duties, responsibilities, conditions and restrictions under the DA with respect to the Property from and after the Effective Date (collectively, "Rights and Obligations").

2. Acceptance and Assumption by Assignee. Assignee, for itself and its successors and assigns, hereby accepts such assignment and assumes all such Rights and Obligations without qualification. Assignee agrees, expressly for the benefit of City, to comply with, perform and execute all of the covenants and obligations of Assignor arising from or under the DA with respect to the Property on or after the Effective Date.
-36-

3. Release of Assignor. Assignee understands that pursuant to the DA, upon the signing and delivery of this Agreement to the City, Assignor will be released by the City from all Rights and Obligations under the DA. From that time forward:
• The term "Owner" in the DA will refer solely to Assignee; and • All the terms, covenants, conditions and provisions of the DA with respect to the Property remain in full force and effect.

4. Recording. Assignor will cause this Agreement to be recorded in The Official Records of Los Angeles County, California, and provide conformed copies of the recorded Agreement to Assignee and City within five (5) business days of recording.

5. Successors and Assigns. All of the terms, covenants, conditions and provisions of this Agreement are binding upon and will inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns, pursuant to Section 23k of the DA.

6. Assignee Address for Notices. The address of Assignee for the purpose of notices, demands, and communications permitted or required under the DA are:

Attention:

Telephone:

Facsimile:

With a copy to:

Attention:

Telephone:

Facsimile:

7. Applicable Law/Venue. This Agreement will be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of California, without reference to choice of law provisions. Any legal actions under this Agreement may be brought only in the Superior Court of the County of Los Angeles, State of California.

S. Interpretation. All parties have been represented by counsel in the preparation and negotiation of this Agreement, and this Agreement will be construed according to the fair meaning of its language. The rule of construction to the effect that ambiguities are to be resolved against the drafting party will not be employed in interpreting this Agreement. Unless the context clearly requires otherwise: (a) the plural and singular numbers will each be deemed to include the other; (b) the masculine, feminine, and neuter genders will each be deemed to include the others; (c) "must," "will," or "agrees" are mandatory, and "may" is permissive; (d) "or" is not exclusive; and (e) "includes" and "including" are not limiting. -37-

9. Headings. Section headings in this Agreement are for convenience only and are not intended to be used in interpreting or construing the terms, covenants or conditions of this Agreement.

10. Severability. Except as otherwise provided herein, if any provision(s) of this Agreement is (are) held invalid, the remainder of this Agreement will not be affected, except as necessarily required by the invalid provisions, and remain in full force and effect unless amended or modified by mutual consent of the parties.

11. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which will be deemed to constitute an original, but all of which, when taken together, constitutes one and the same instrument, with the same effect as if all of the parties to this Agreement had executed the same counterpart.

12. Effective Date. The Effective Date of this Agreement is the date upon which Assignee obtains fee title to the Property ("Effective Date"). For the purposes of this Section, the evidence of transfer consists of a duly recorded deed and title report.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Assignor and Assignee have entered into this Agreement as of the date first above written.
[Signatures follow on separate page]
Dated:

Assignor:

BELLFLOWER 5 INV, LLC a California
Limited Liability Company
Manager
Assignee:

-38-

EXHIBIT D

SCHEDULE OF PERFORMANCE

ITEM OF PERFORMANCE

TIME FOR PERFORMANCE
City second reading of Development
Agreement Ordinance
Within 14 days of Development
Agreement (DA) Approval and first
reading of ordinance
DA Ordinance becomes effective
30 days after second reading and
adoption of ordinance
City submits Notice of Determination to
County Recorder's Office
Within 5 days of adoption of ordinance
Developer submits an initial development
application to develop an additional 14
townhomes on the 9855 Flower Street
parcel
Within 120 days after the Developer's
delivery of an Approval Notice as defined
in the PSA for 9855 Flower Street
City approves development application
submittal by Developer to develop an
additional 14 townhomes on the 9855
Flower Street parcel
Within 60 days of deeming Developer's
application submittal complete.

Developer submits Project for plan check
Within 180 days after City's final approval
of the Entitlements for 9855 Flower Street
Developer starts Project construction.

Within 90 days of City's plan check
approval and issuance of all required
permits for Project construction.

Project completion (certificate of
occupancy for all units and City sign -off
on all required public and offsite
improvements).

By no later than the Maturity Date of the
Loans for 9855 Rower Street and 9903
Flower Street
-39-

EXHIBIT E

PUBLIC BENEFITS
The following benefits to the City, its residents, and the Bellflower community result from this Agreement:
• The Project is part of City's downtown and its revitalization is crucial for the economic revitalization of the downtown.
• The Project is located on underutilized property. Improving the property through private investment increases tax revenue for public welfare and is a critical component of City's overall plan for a thriving downtown.
• Providing housing which will help to satisfy City's obligation to meet City's share of regional housing needs.
• Fulfilling the long-term economic goals for City by providing housing to help offset the jobs/housing imbalance.
• Providing for -sale housing units to increase City's overall housing supply. • The Project creates economic opportunity to City and all property tax collecting entities in that development of the Project will result in an increase of at least 15 percent of total property tax resulting from the Project at full implementation when compared to the year before the Property being acquired by City.
• Relieving pressure to build housing in existing neighborhoods. • Providing short-term construction employment within City. • Enhancing access to City's public recreational facilities by contributing toward a transit - oriented development Project within walking distance to a Class I II bikeway, Library Garden Park, Town Center Plaza, Friendship Plaza, Pirate Park, the Los Angeles County Health Department, the Los Angeles County Library, and the Mayne Events Center. • As designed, the Project provides a balance of density, cohesiveness and integration into the surrounding downtown neighborhood and is significantly less impactful in size, scale, density and parking as would otherwise be permitted by state law. • Enhancing access to various public facilities by providing a transit -oriented development Project within walking distance to the future Downtown Bellflower Station for the proposed Southeast Gateway Line, Bellflower City Hall, the Los Angeles County Health Department, the Los Angeles County Library, and the Los Angeles County Superior Court. • The Project prevents the spread of blight in the downtown by reusing and repurposing the currently vacant former White's Funeral Home property. The Project enhances the appearance of the community through creative design of buildings, structures, and facilities.
-40-

ATTACHMENT A

EXHIBIT B
Zoning Map Amendment
-41-

EXHIBIT B OF ORDINANCE NO. 1456 - ZONING MAP AMENDMENT
Oak Street
t
if
Q'
pJBAOInog Jamognag
Maple Street
Zoning
FSSP Boundary
is
a
F-
FSSP
TC (Town Center District)
R-3 (Mulitiple Residential Zone)
R-2 (Medium Density
Residential Zone)
R-1 (Low Density
Residential Zone)
Belmont Street
Flower Street
aMJ3 Ja;UO3 3!A!3
NAP
� Ooo • DR Ii1
~
m
CD
C -G (General Commercial Zone)
® M-1 (Light Industrial District)
P (Public Uses Zone)
O -S (Open Space Zoning District)
TODSP Boundary (Note: Planning Area designations are not delineated - refer to TODSP document) -42-

ATTACHMENT A

EXHIBIT C
Flower Street Specific Plan
-43-

FLOWER STREET

SPECIFIC
PLAN

City of Bellflower
Flower Street Specific Plan