Berkeley City Council
March 25, 2025

Pacific Steel Casting: Zoning, General Plan and West Berkeley Plan Amendments, Draft EIR Hearing Item 10

Figure 1: Project Site

Zoning
District Boundary
The City of Berkeley Zoning Map
would be amended to re-designate the site bounded
by Gilman, Eastshore, Page Street and Third Street/ Union Pacific Railroad tracks from M to M-RD (see Figures 2 and 3 below). The proposed boundary of this new zoning district would be consistent with the 2021 Council referral and the 2022 Zoning Map amendment application, and would facilitate potential redevelopment of the site by providing a well-defined and uniform area. More detailed parcel information is found in Table 3.A in the Draft EIR Project Description (Attachment 5).

Pacific Steel Casting: Zoning, General Plan and West Berkeley Plan Amendments, Draft EIR Hearing Item 10

Figure 2: Existing Zoning Map

Figure
3: Proposed Zoning Map

Pacific Steel Casting: Zoning, General Plan and West Berkeley Plan Amendments, Draft EIR Hearing Item 10

Zoning District Purposes
At the February and March 2023 Planning Commission meetings, staff recommended draft purpose statements (Attachment 4, pages 5-6) consistent with the Manufacturing land use designation and West Berkeley Plan, as well as the objectives of the Council referral and the Potential Berkeley Forge Development. The Planning Commission expressed support for these purposes. Staff are proposing the following changes to the purposes to ensure compatibility with the General Plan and West Berkeley Plan, and to facilitate redevelopment and environmental remediation of large sites, consistent with the Council referral:
• Revise M-RD purpose statement #1 to better reflect the goal of supporting high- quality employment that adds to the City’s tax base by providing for a wider range of allowed uses.
• Add a purpose statement to provide flexibility in the M-RD development standards to accommodate the Potential Berkeley Forge Development (See “Modification to Development Standards” section below for more details). • R eplace the word “visitors” with “customers” in purpose statement #3 to better reflect allowed uses.
• C onsolidate the purpose statements regarding environmental quality and industrial uses to clarify that industrial uses are allowed subject to compliance with environmental protection standards.

Therefore, the following district purposes for the M-RD District are proposed:

1. S upport a mix of industrial and heavy commercial uses, such as light manufacturing and R&D, particularly those which can provide high-quality employment for people at all educational levels and add significantly to the tax base;

2. A llow office and laboratory uses that support light industrial and research and development uses;

3. P rovide flexibility to facilitate the development and reuse of large sites with an urban campus-like environment, demonstrating high-quality design and site planning that includes amenities for employees and customers; and

4. S upport the development of industrial uses that would which satisfy performance standards that protect the environment.

These purposes are consistent with the General Plan Land Use Element as well as the goals and policies of the West Berkeley Plan. More specifically, the M-RD purpose statements were designed to provide for “a continued economic and land use mix” called for in the West Berkeley Plan4, by incorporating manufacturing, industrial, retail and office/laboratory uses to benefit Berkeley residents and businesses economically, benefit the City government fiscally, and promote the varied and interesting character of the area.

4 West Berkeley Plan. Chapter IV Land Use Element Goals and Policies, Goal 1, page 34. https://berkeleyca.gov/sites/default/files/2022-03/12_14_1993%3B%20CLK%20- %20Resolution%3B%20City%20Council%3B%2057301%3B%20West%20Berkeley%20Area%20Plan%3B.pdf

Pacific Steel Casting: Zoning, General Plan and West Berkeley Plan Amendments, Draft EIR Hearing Item 10

Allowed Uses and Permit Thresholds
Staff initially presented to the Planning Commission a recommendation to allow a narrower set of allowed uses in the M-RD district than those allowed in the MU-LI district in order to target a mix of light manufacturing, R&D, laboratory and office uses.

At their February 1, 2023 and March 1, 2023 meetings, the Planning Commission expressed support for a wider range of allowed uses. Consistent with that feedback, as well as with input received from OED, staff are proposing a broader set of allowed uses that are similar to what is allowed in the MU-LI district, with a few exceptions noted in Table 1 below. Most notably, Laboratory, semiconductor manufacturing, and R&D uses would be permitted at lower thresholds than are currently allowed in the MU-LI district.

Table 1: Allowed Uses Comparison – MU-LI and M-RD Districts

USE MU-LI M-RD
Retail Uses
Alcoholic Beverage Retail Sale UP(PH)*[2] NP
Industrial and Mining Products AUP[4] NP
Food & Alcohol Service, Lodging, Entertainment, and Assembly Uses Amusement Device Arcade ZC NP
Theater UP(PH)* NP
Vehicle Service and Sales Uses
Vehicle Wrecking AUP*[4] NP
Industrial and Heavy Commercial Uses
Commercial Excavation UP(PH) NP
Dry Cleaning and Laundry Plant ZC[1] NP
Laboratory: Commercial Physical or Biological UP(PH)* AUP[4] Laboratory: Cannabis Testing UP(PH) AUP[4]
Manufacturing: Semiconductors NP UP(PH)
Research and Development ZC[12] ZC[13]
Notes:
[1] Requires an AUP for uses 20,000 sq. ft. to 30,000 square feet. Requires a Use Permit for uses more than 30,000 sq. ft.
[2] Not permitted 20,000 sq. ft. or more.
[4]
Requires a Use Permit for uses more than 20,000 sq. ft. [6] Not permitted over 3,000 sq. ft.
[12] Requires an AUP for uses more than 20,000 sq. ft.
[13] Requires an AUP for uses 60,000 sq. ft. to 100,000 sq. ft. Requires a Use Permit for uses 100,000 sq. ft. or more.
* Use-Specific Standards Apply

Floor Area and Tenant Space Reconfiguration Permit Thresholds Consi
stent with the objectives of the 2021 C
ouncil referral, the proposed permit
thresholds allow flexibility for future users of the area to adapt to changing building needs over time. The proposed permit thresholds in Table 2 below for construction of

Pacific Steel Casting: Zoning, General Plan and West Berkeley Plan Amendments, Draft EIR Hearing Item 10

new floor area and tenant space reconfiguration are intended to establish a streamlined and cost-effective process to encourage flexible business growth over time.

Table 2: New Floor Area Permit Comparison – M-RD and MU-LI Districts Permit Type M-RD MU-LI
ZC Less than 60,000 sq. ft. Less than 10,000 sq. ft.

AUP 60,000 to less than 100,000 sq. ft. 10,000 to less than 20,000 sq. ft.

UP(PH) 100,000 sq. ft. or more 20,000 sq. ft. or more

In addition, the proposed Zoning Ordinance amendment requ ires the same permit
thresholds for reconfiguring a tenant space in the M-RD district as the existing districts in the West Berkeley Plan Area. T
he M-RD will require the same findings to approve a
permit for a tenant reconfiguration project as are required in the MM (Mixed Manufacturing) district, more specifically that a proposed conversion of tenant space is necessary to implement the purpose of the district. This language aligns with the Zoning Map amendment application, which described that life science businesses in the area tend to occupy smaller tenant spaces and scale up over time, and therefore may require a property owner to subdivide a building over its lifespan to accommodate new small businesses or accommodate expanding businesses.

Development Standards
Staff presented to the Planning Commission general development standards for the proposed M-RD district to prepare a project description for analysis in the Draft EIR at their February 1, 2023 meeting, and a revised set of standards at their March 1, 2023 meeting based on Commission feedback (Attachment 4). Consistent with feedback received, as well as with recent, similar development projects in West Berkeley, staff are proposing the following set of development standards to facilitate redevelopment of the area
5 with in-demand industrial and heavy commercial uses. Table 3 below provides a summary of the proposed development standards along with the existing M and MU-LI district standards, and the standards proposed at the March 1, 2023 Planning Commission meeting. The standards for maximum height and minimum off-street loading have been revised since the March 1, 2023 Planning Commission meeting.

Each regulation is discussed in further detail below.

5 Inclusive of the proposed M-RD district area, see Figure 3 above.

Pacific Steel Casting: Zoning, General Plan and West Berkeley Plan Amendments, Draft EIR Hearing Item 10

Table 3: Summary of Existing and Proposed Development Standards Regulation M & MU-LI Districts
(Existing)
March 1, 2023 Planning
Commission Meeting
Proposed Standard
Current M-RD Proposal
Maximum Height 45 feet 105 feet
55 f
eet*
See Modification of
Development Standards
section (*105 feet is
allowed if conditions are
met)
Maximum Floor
Area Ratio (FAR) 2.0 2.0 2.0
Minimum Setbacks,
and Building
Separation
Not regulated Not regulated Not regulated
Maximum Lot
Coverage Not regulated 80 percent 80 percent
Minimum Off-Street
Parking and
Minimum Bicycle
Parking
Vehicle: See BMC Table

23.322-4
Vehicle: Table 23.322-4,
with following changes:
• All non-residential
uses except uses
listed below: 1 per
1,000 sq.ft.
• Laboratories: 1 per
1,000 sq.ft.

Vehicle: Table 23.322-4,
with following changes:
• All non-residential
uses except uses
listed below: 1 per
1,000 sq.ft.
• Laboratories: 1 per
1,000 sq.ft.

Bicycle: 1 per 2,000
sq.ft.

Bicycle: Same
requirements as existing
for non-residential uses
Bicycle: Same
requirements as existing
for non-residential uses
Minimum Off-Street
Loading Spaces
For commercial and
manufacturing uses
10,000 sq.ft. or more: 1
space for the first 10,000
sq. ft. plus 1 additional
space for each additional
25,000 sq. ft.

No changes proposed
• R&D uses 25,000
sq. ft. or more: 1
space (25,000 –
100,000 sq. ft.); 2
spaces (more than
100,000 to 200,000
sq. ft.; 1 space (each
additional 100,000
sq. ft.
• A ll other commercial
and manufacturing
uses 10,000 sq. ft. or
more: 1 space for
the first 10,000 sq. ft.
plus 1 additional
space for each
additional 25,000 sq.
ft.

Pacific Steel Casting: Zoning, General Plan and West Berkeley Plan Amendments, Draft EIR Hearing Item 10

Maximum Building Height
The current height limit in the MU-LI di strict is 45 feet. The Zoning Map appli cation
includes a request to increase the maximum building height to 105 feet to support the unique building needs of R&D and laboratory uses, which require taller ceiling heights and reinforced floors (see February 1, 2023 staff report, Attachment 4). Planning Commission expressed support for this maximum. In order to maintain consistency with the West Berkeley Plan, which recommended maximum heights of three stories across the manufacturing districts,
6 staff are proposing a maximum building height of 55 feet.

This maximum would allow a 3-story building, assuming 20-foot ground-floor heights and 16.5-foot upper story heights, measured floor to floor, typical of R&D and laboratory user needs7 (see Figure 4 below). However, projects in the M-RD district consisting of at least nine acres could be constructed with a maximum building height of 105 feet (see Modifications to Development Standards section below) if the Zoning Adjustments Board makes certain findings (described further below).

Figure 4: Existing and Proposed Maximum Building Height

Maximum FAR
Consistent with the 2021 Council referral, and 2022 Zoning Map amendment application, and 2023 feedback from the Planning Commission, no changes are proposed to the existing maximum FAR of 2.0 currently allowed in the M district. As the total area of the proposed M-RD district is approximately 463,549 square feet, the maximum buildout of approximately 927,098 square feet of gross floor area is consistent with what was previously evaluated in the General Plan and West Berkeley Plan and the associated EIRs. In other words, development within this district would not exceed the amount of development already anticipated in the West Berkeley Plan area and would be consistent with adopted plans.

Setbacks, Building Separation, and Lot Coverage

6 Table 1-5, page 153
7 Attachment 3, Zoning Map Application, pages 7-8.

Pacific Steel Casting: Zoning, General Plan and West Berkeley Plan Amendments, Draft EIR Hearing Item 10

Lot coverage is not currently regulated in Berkeley’s Manufacturing districts. Consistent with Planning Commission feedback at their February 1, 2023 and March 1, 2023 meeting, staff proposes a maximum of 80 percent lot coverage to both facilitate redevelopment and help ensure that open space and amenities for employees are provided for future projects in this district. Some Planning Commissioners expressed support for a maximum of 100 percent. However, staff evaluated the feasibility of development at 100 percent lot coverage and found that due to required infrastructure, building entries, loading spaces, and design characteristics of recent projects in the West Berkeley Plan Area, and given the desire to maximize the allowable FAR which includes additional building height (Attachment 3, pages 7-9), 100 percent lot coverage would not be likely to occur. Further, an 80 percent maximum would help ensure that the future redevelopment of the area furthers the proposed purpose to provide high-quality design and site planning, including amenities for employees and customers, such as landscaped areas and outdoor gathering spaces. No changes are proposed to minimum building setbacks or minimum building separation, which are not regulated in the Manufacturing districts.

Minimum Off-Street Vehicular Parking and Bicycle Parking Staff presented to the Planning Commission recommendations to revise minimum off- street parking for laboratories and other uses not otherwise listed in BMC Table 23.322- 4, which include R&D and office. At their February 1 and March 1, 2023 meetings, the Planning Commission expressed support for these changes, which are included in the proposed zoning amendments. No changes are proposed to the existing off-street bicycle parking requirement.

Minimum Off-Street Loading Spaces
Amendments are proposed to the off-street loading space requirement for R&D uses in the M-RD district to better support the unique loading needs of this use. The proposed changes are to:
• Increase the threshold for which the loading space requirement applies from 10,000 square feet to 25,000 square feet; and
• Simplify the formula to determine the number of spaces required as follows: 1 space required for buildings between 25,000 and 100,000 square feet; 2 spaces required for buildings more than 100,000 to 200,000 square feet; and 1 space for each additional 100,000 square feet.

For example, a 125,000 square foot building containing an R&D use would currently be required to provide 5 loading spaces in all Manufacturing districts (M, MM, MU-LI), while 2 spaces would be required in the M-RD district with the proposed changes.

Unlike vehicle parking space requirements, there is no published generation rate for demand of loading spaces. Staff reviewed requirements in nearby jurisdictions with R&D development activity. The cities of Emeryville and Richmond provide different loading requirements for R&D use than other industrial uses, with R&D uses requiring fewer loading spaces than other types of industrial uses. Oakland, South San Francisco

Pacific Steel Casting: Zoning, General Plan and West Berkeley Plan Amendments, Draft EIR Hearing Item 10

and Hercules require loading spaces for buildings of at least 50,000 to 100,000 square feet in size. A review of recent R&D redevelopment projects in West Berkeley found that oftentimes, these applications include permit requests to reduce the number of off-street loading spaces required.8 The proposed changes are consistent with requirements in nearby jurisdictions with R&D development, and would streamline future development in the M-RD district by providing an objective standard for off-street loading spaces.

Modifications to Development Standards
Recognizing the need to address the issues of public concern associated with the site (i.e., environmental contamination and blight), staff are proposing to provide flexibility in the M-RD development standards to facilitate redevelopment with high-quality design and site planning. The proposed Modification to Development Standards section of the Zoning Ordinance amendment would allow flexibility in the FAR, height and coverage standards for projects of at least nine acres, which may comprise multiple parcels and blocks. An eligible project would be subject to a maximum building height of 105 feet, and would be allowed to comply with the maximum FAR and coverage standards on a project-wide basis rather than on a parcel by parcel basis, as long as the FAR and/or coverage on an individual parcel does not exceed the maximum allowed by more than 20 percent and the eligible project as a whole complies with the maximum FAR (2.0) and lot coverage (80 percent) allowed in M-RD. This flexibility is intended to create visual interest from both the Gilman Street entry corridor and from pedestrian level within the site, allow for open space, and maintain views.

This section would require the Zoning Adjustments Board (ZAB) to issue a use permit upon finding that the modification would result in a better overall design than that which could be achieved by strict application of the development standards alone and does not unduly burden the implementation of subsequent development. This section would also grant ZAB the authority to impose any reasonable conditions to ensure that the required findings can be made, such as a reimbursement agreement between the City and the developer, surety/bond/letter of credit, or private maintenance agreement.

In order to provide assurances that a complete project over 9 acres would be delivered, the Modification to Development Standards section would require an applicant to submit a development plan as part of their zoning permit application that includes 1) a phasing plan; and 2) a development comparison demonstrating how the site-wide changes in development standards maximize amenities for employees and customers. A deed restriction would be required to ensure compliance with Conditions of Approval for the zoning permit in perpetuity.

Properties located within the West Berkeley Plan Area may be eligible for two specific zoning permits in Title 23 – a Master Use Permit (Section 23.406.060) and a

8 BMC Section 23.322.100(C)(5) Modified Requirements. In all Manufacturing and Commercial Districts other than the C-T district, the Zoning Officer in consultation with the City Traffic Engineer may approve an AUP to modify the on-site loading spaces standards in this section.

Pacific Steel Casting: Zoning, General Plan and West Berkeley Plan Amendments, Draft EIR Hearing Item 10

Modification of Development Standards in the West Berkeley Plan Area (Section

23.406.080). Since the proposed set of allowed modifications to the M-RD development standards are to address the unique issues of public concern associated with the project site, projects in the M-RD district would not be eligible for a Master Use Permit nor a Modification to Development Standards in the West Berkeley Plan Area permit.

General Plan and West Berkeley Plan Amendments
The proposed Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map amendments require associated amendments to the West Berkeley Plan and General Plan to ensure consistency between the Zoning Ordinance and the General Plan.
9 The proposed West Berkeley
Plan amendments would incorporate the new zoning district into the Land Use Element by creating a new policy, updating the Land Use Map, and adding a description of the district to the districting concept (see Attachment 1, Exhibit B). The General Plan would be amended to add the new zoning district to the existing Manufacturing land use classification (see Attachment 1, Exhibit C). Pursuant to BMC Chapter 22.04, staff is requesting the Planning Commission consider these proposed amendments.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The City has prepared a Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the proposed project that evaluates the potential environmental effects of: 1) adoption and implementation of the proposed M-RD zoning and associated Plan amendments; and 2) the Potential Berkeley Forge Development, as it would be facilitated by adoption and implementation of the proposed M-RD zoning, to the extent site planning details have been provided.10 Recognizing there are various ways in which the project site could be redeveloped under the proposed M-RD zoning, evaluation of the Potential Berkeley Forge Development is not intended to illustrate nor limit the subsequent development proposal that the applicant may submit at a future date. The Draft EIR is a programmatic evaluation, meaning that it evaluates the potential impacts of the application of regulations, in this case, adoption of zoning and plan amendments. In addition, the Draft EIR evaluates the potential impacts of development of the Potential Berkeley Forge Development, to the extent site planning details have been provided.

The City is the Lead Agency for the proposed project and is represented by the Planning and Development Department. Under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), a Lead Agency may proceed directly with EIR preparation, without an Initial Study, if it is clear that an EIR will be required. As the City has made such a determination for this project, no Initial Study has been prepared. A Notice of Availability (NOA) of a Draft EIR was published on October 21, 2024 (Attachment 6). The Draft

9 The West Berkeley Plan is an amendment to Berkeley’s General Plan, providing policies to guide development in West Berkeley.
10 Because the California Environmental Quality Act requires analysis of alternatives that would reduce environmental impacts compared to the Gilman Gateway Rezone Project, the Draft EIR also analyzes 3) a reduced development alternative in which the zoning and plan amendments would cover a smaller area, 4) a “no action” alternative in which development would occur consistent with current land use and zoning designations, and 5) a “no action” alternative in which neither rezoning nor development occurs.

Pacific Steel Casting: Zoning, General Plan and West Berkeley Plan Amendments, Draft EIR Hearing Item 10

EIR was posted to the City’s website on that date. The public comment period for the Draft EIR ends on December 5, 2024.

In accordance with CEQA Guidelines, a Notice of Preparation (NOP) of a Draft EIR was circulated to potentially interested parties and agencies on December 27, 2022 (Attachment 7). The City received written responses to the NOP regarding the scope and content of the EIR. The City also held an EIR scoping meeting as part of the regularly scheduled Planning Commission meeting on February 1, 2023. Approximately 38 people attended the hearing and eight verbal or written comments on the scope and content of the EIR were received.

The following environmental topics are addressed in detail in the Draft EIR (Chapter 4:

Setting, Impacts and Mitigation Measures, Sections 4.1 through 4.11):
 4.1 Land Use and Planning
 4.2 Cultural Resources
 4.3 Tribal Cultural Resources
 4.4 Transportation
 4.5 Air Quality
 4.6 Greenhouse Gas Emissions
 4.7 Energy
 4.8 Noise
 4.9 Hazards and Hazardous Materials
 4.10 Hydrology and Water Quality
 4.11 Biological Resources

The Draft EIR identified five significant and unavoidable environmental impacts in Sections 4.2, 4.5 and 4.6 related to Cultural Resources, Air Quality, and Greenhouse Gas Emissions. All other environmental effects of the proposed project can be reduced to less than significant levels through implementation of Standard Condition(s) of Approval and/or recommended mitigation measures.

The Draft EIR also briefly discusses any possible significant effects that were determined not to be significant or less than significant with implementation of applicable standard conditions and regulatory compliance measures related to the following environmental topics: Aesthetics, Agricultural Resources, Geology and Soils, Mineral Resources, Population and Housing, Public Services, Recreation, Utilities and Service Systems, and Wildfire.

Project Objectives
Section 15124 of the CEQA Guidelines requires an EIR to include a statement of the objectives sought by the proposed project. These Project Objectives helped the City develop a reasonable range of alternatives to evaluate in the EIR and prepare any necessary findings or statements of overriding consideration. The Project Objectives of the proposed project are to:

Pacific Steel Casting: Zoning, General Plan and West Berkeley Plan Amendments, Draft EIR Hearing Item 10

• Reinvent the former PSC site and adjacent parcels from an underutilized, heavy manufacturing campus into a vibrant urban campus-like environment with in- demand industrial and heavy commercial uses consistent with the intent of the Manufacturing land use designation that adds significantly to the City’s economic base and facilitates job creation.
• Establish an M-RD zoning district with land use and development standards that are consistent with the General Plan Manufacturing land use designation and policies of the West Berkeley Plan to retain a diversity of dense, high-quality employment opportunities in West Berkeley for people at all educational levels by allowing for a mix of industrial and heavy commercial uses, such as light manufacturing, R&D, laboratory, and office.
• Facilitate future development by adopting zoning standards that permit construction of buildings that accommodate allowable uses. • Improve mobility at an entry corridor to West Berkeley by encouraging and supporting current and future transit use and transportation demand management strategies that reduce vehicle miles traveled, while providing sufficient parking to meet the needs of employment-generating uses. • Clean up environmentally contaminated soils that have contributed impacts to air quality and water quality in the neighborhood.

Project Description in the Draft EIR
The proposed project, referred to as the Gilman Gateway Rezone Project, would aim to facilitate the future development of up to 1,005,266 square feet of non-residential space and a minimum of 1,300 off-street automobile parking spaces on the approximately

11.54-acre project site, with adoption and implementation of:

1. A newly established zoning district – M-RD in BMC Chapter 23.206, which would permit development of light manufacturing, R&D, laboratory, and/or office uses.

2. Rezoning the project site from the M district to the M-RD zoning district.

3. Amendments to the Berkeley General Plan and West Berkeley Plan to add the M-RD zoning district to the Manufacturing land use designation, which would also include development standards for the project site.

Adoption and implementation of the Gilman Gateway Rezone Project would facilitate the development of a conceptual project referred to as the Potential Berkeley Forge Development. The City anticipates the submittal of a formal application for the conceptual development project at the project site, and it is therefore evaluated in the EIR as a reasonably foreseeable project. The Potential Berkeley Forge Development would include the construction and operation of up to 900,000 square feet of R&D, office, laboratory, and light manufacturing uses and 1,900 automobile parking spaces on a 10.26-acre portion of the project site spanning 15 parcels.

The EIR evaluates the impacts of the most intensive future uses that could occur with implementation of the proposed zoning and plan amendments, while the impacts of the conceptual development project are evaluated to the extent project details are available.

All future development of the project site, including the Potential Berkeley Forge

Pacific Steel Casting: Zoning, General Plan and West Berkeley Plan Amendments, Draft EIR Hearing Item 10

Development, would be subject to further environmental review to determine if the future development fits within the development assumptions and conclusions identified in this EIR, or if additional environmental review is needed.

Buildout Projections
For the purposes of environmental review of the Gilman Gateway Rezone Project, the Draft EIR includes development projections to provide a physical project the environmental effects of which can be analyzed. The EIR evaluates the maximum reasonable development scenario, which includes demolition of the existing buildings, construction of up to 1,005,266 square feet of nonresidential space at a maximum building height of 105 feet, and a minimum of 1,300 off-street automobile parking spaces on the 11.54-acre site. The EIR also evaluates the conceptual Berkeley Forge Development, which would include the construction and operation of up to 900,000 square feet of R&D, office, laboratory, and light manufacturing uses and 1,900 automobile parking spaces on a 10.26-acre portion of the project site. The buildout of the Potential Berkeley Forge Development is assumed to be consistent with the development standards of the proposed M-RD zoning district. Any future application would be evaluated to ensure consistency with the M-RD standards.

Potentially Significant Impacts Identified in the Draft EIR All environmental impacts and mitigation measures are summarized in the Executive Summary (Table 2.A) in the Draft EIR. Table 2.A also identifies the level of significance of the impact after application of the applicable mitigation. Other than the impacts discussed below, all of the environmental effects of the proposed project can be reduced to less than significant levels through implementation of Condition(s) of Approval and/or recommended mitigation measures.

The Draft EIR identifies potential impacts stemming from: 1) the proposed project (zoning and plan amendments); and 2) the Potential Berkeley Forge Development (conceptual development project). Impact titles that include a lower case ‘a’ pertain to the proposed project, while impact titles that include a lower case ‘b’ pertain to the Potential Berkeley Forge Development. The Draft EIR identifies the following significant and unavoidable environmental impacts:
 Impact CUL-1a (Historic Architectural Resources). The proposed project would cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historic resource as defined in CEQA Guidelines section 15064.5, because implementation of the proposed project would facilitate the demolition of the existing building at 1306 Third Street, which is eligible for listing as a City of Berkeley landmark.
 Impact AIR-3a2 (Project Construction Air Quality Emissions). Construction associated with full buildout of the project site (per the proposed rezoning project) would not exceed BAAQMD thresholds and would not expose nearby sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations with implementation of identified mitigation measures. However, construction associated with any future development projects facilitated by the proposed project that would not include

Pacific Steel Casting: Zoning, General Plan and West Berkeley Plan Amendments, Draft EIR Hearing Item 10

the demolition of the structure located at 1306 Third Street, including the conceptual development project, would exceed the BAAQMD cancer risk significance thresholds and would therefore expose sensitive receptors in the building to substantial pollutant concentrations.
 Impact AIR-3b (Project Operation Air Quality Emissions). Operation of future development projects facilitated by the proposed project, including the conceptual development project, may expose nearby sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations and could result in potential Toxic Air Contaminants health risks that would cumulatively contribute to elevated health risks in the city.
 Impact GHG-1a (Project Operation Greenhouse Gas Emissions). If future development under the proposed project includes natural gas, the proposed project would not meet the project design thresholds recommended by the BAAQMD and would therefore generate GHG emissions, either directly or indirectly, that would have a significant effect on the environment.  Impact GHG-2a (Inconsistency with Plans, Policies or Regulations Adopted for the Purpose of Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions). If future development at the project site includes natural gas, the proposed project would not meet the project design thresholds recommended by the BAAQMD and would be considered inconsistent with the long-term State GHG reduction goals and emission targets in Assembly Bill 32, Senate Bill 32, Executive Order B-30- 15, Executive Order B-48-18, and Assembly Bill 1279. Accordingly, the proposed project would conflict with applicable plans, policies, or regulations adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions.

Tribal Consultation (AB 52 and SB18)
Pursuant to the requirements of Assembly Bill 52 (2014, Gatto) 11 and Senate Bill 18
(2004, Burton)12, City staff consulted with the Confederated Villages of Lisjan Nation (Lisjan Nation) regarding the proposed project. The goal of tribal consultation is to avoid significant effects on tribal cultural resources or to develop mutually agreed upon mitigation measures or. As part of the consultation process, City staff sent a formal memorandum to the Lisjan Nation to disclose potential impact determinations identified in the Draft EIR for the Gilman Gateway Rezoning project, proposed conditions of approval (COAs), and proposed mitigation measures. On May 30, 2024, the Lisjan Nation provided written edits to the proposed COAs and mitigation measures. The City subsequently revised the COAs and mitigation measures to incorporate the majority of the edits provided to the City by the Lisjan Nation, with one exception.

11 Requires public agencies to consult with Native American tribes during the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) process. The legislation aims to protect tribal cultural heritage and provide a formal structure for tribes to provide input on proposed projects.
https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=201320140AB52&search_keywords= 12 Requires public agencies to consult with Native American tribes when an amendment to a local jurisdictions’ General Plan, any Specific Plan, or a designation of open space, is proposed. The legislation aims to protect tribal cultural heritage and provide a formal structure for tribes to provide input on the proposed amendment. https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=200320040SB18

Pacific Steel Casting: Zoning, General Plan and West Berkeley Plan Amendments, Draft EIR Hearing Item 10

The Lisjan Nation requested to incorporate a mitigation measure that requires the City to enter into consultation based on the specifics of a proposed development, even when an EIR is not required, or when only an addendum to an EIR is required. The goal of this proposed consultation would be to reduce the potential for any future project to unearth tribal cultural resources that would result in a potential impact to the significance of the resource (Impact TCR-1, Chapter 4, Section 4.3 Tribal Cultural Resources). Under AB 52, consultation must be initiated by the City for all projects that require environmental review under CEQA. However, this request would require the City to initiate consultation for projects that do not require environmental review. This requirement could potentially establish a precedent for future projects, and would therefore constitute a policy decision that falls outside of the bounds of the authority vested to staff. Therefore, the proposed language is provided below for consideration by the Planning Commission and the City Council:

Potential Mitigation Measure TCR-1a: Given the very high potential for disturbing Tribal Cultural Resources in this highly sensitive area, including ancestral human remains, Confederated Villages of Lisjan Nation will be allowed a 30-day comment period to provide requests for additional mitigation measures based on any specific development plans proposed by a project proponent even when a supplemental EIR is not required or where only an addendum may be required.

Alternatives in the Draft EIR
As required by Section 15126.6 of the CEQA Guidelines, an EIR must examine a range of reasonable alternatives to the proposed project that would feasibly obtain most of the CEQA Project Objectives and avoid or substantially lessen many of the project’s significant environmental impacts. The following alternatives are evaluated in the Draft EIR:

 Alternative 1: No Action Alternative. This alternative is a version of the “no project” alternative (CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.6(e)) that assumes no construction on the site would occur. The existing buildings would not be demolished and would instead remain in place, unchanged from existing conditions. The existing Manufacturing land use and zoning designations would remain, and in the City of Berkeley General Plan and West Berkeley Area Plan would not be amended.
 Alternative 2: General Plan Compliant Alternative. This alternative is a version of the “no project” alternative (State CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.6(e)) that assumes the project site would be redeveloped pursuant to the current land use and zoning designations. Implementation of the General Plan Compliant Alternative would allow for the development of approximately 1,005,365 square feet of manufacturing and industrial uses on the 11.54-acre project site. Under this alternative, the maximum height would be limited to 45 feet.

Pacific Steel Casting: Zoning, General Plan and West Berkeley Plan Amendments, Draft EIR Hearing Item 10

 Alternative 3: Reduced Development Alternative. This alternative assumes the project site would be limited to the PSC site, consistent with the City Council referral. The Pacific Steel Casting overlay zoning boundary would include nine parcels totaling 354,317 square feet. These parcels are currently developed with 250,606 square feet of industrial uses (see Table 3.A in the Draft EIR for details).

This alternative would also require a minimum 100-foot buffer between any existing residential use and proposed new non-residential use, including surface parking lots or structures. Accordingly, future development on the project site would need to be set back from the existing building at 1306 Third Street.

Focusing development on the Pacific Steel Casting site with a required buffer would reduce the overall buildout potential of the project site by approximately 50 percent, resulting in up to 566,300 square feet of non-residential space and a minimum of 566 off-street automobile parking spaces.
• Environmentally Superior Alternative. CEQA requires the identification of the environmentally superior alternative among the options studied, which is the alternative among those studied that has the fewest significant environmental impacts. Table 5.A in the Draft EIR indicates whether each alternative’s environmental impact is greater, lesser, or similar to that of the proposed project.

As described in Section 5.8 of the Draft EIR, the No Action Alternative would result in the fewest impacts and would be environmentally superior to the proposed project. However, if the No Action Alternative is the environmentally superior alternative, the EIR must identify an environmentally superior alternative from among the other alternatives.
13 None of the other alternatives would avoid
the significant and unavoidable impacts to air quality or GHG emissions, due to the lack of construction details and the usage of natural gas. Of the development alternatives, Alternative 2 the “General Plan Compliant Alternative” would avoid the significant and unavoidable air quality impacts associated with construction risk, but would not avoid or reduce the significant and unavoidable historic resource impact associated with 1306 Third Street. Alternative 3 the “Reduced Development Alternative” would avoid the significant and unavoidable historic resource impact associated with 1306 Third Street, and would lower the significant and unavoidable construction health risk impacts at 1306 Third Street because the development potential would be reduced by 50 percent.

Because Alternative 3 would avoid the proposed project’s significant and unavoidable impacts on built historic resources and would have lower impacts than the proposed project as they relate to the significant and unavoidable impact to air quality, and it would meet most of the project objectives, it is considered as the Environmentally Superior Alternative.

13 State CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.6(e)(2).

Pacific Steel Casting: Zoning, General Plan and West Berkeley Plan Amendments, Draft EIR Hearing Item 10

Publication and Distribution of the Draft EIR
The Draft EIR was made available for public review on Oct ober 21, 2024. The Notice of
Availability (NOA) for the Draft EIR was distributed to State and local planning agencies (Attachment 6). The NOA was posted in the office of the County Clerk and notices of the public hearing were published in the Berkeley Voice. Copies of the Draft EIR are available for review and distribution at 1947 Center Street, 2nd Floor, Berkeley CA, 94704. Additional copies are available for review at the additional locations listed below and on the City’s website: https://aca.cityofberkeley.info/CitizenAccess/Welcome.aspx, under Zoning Application Permit Number “PLN2022-0079”.
 City of Berkeley at 1947 Center Street, 2nd Floor;
 Central (Downtown) Library, 2090 Kittredge Street;
 T
area Hall Pittman South Branch Library, 1901 Russell Street; and  West Branch Library, 1125 University Avenue.

The Planning Commission is also being asked to take public testimony on the Dra ft EIR
and provide comments to staff on the Draft EIR. Comments on the Draft EIR should focus on whether the Draft EIR is sufficient in discussing possible impacts to the physical environment, ways in which the potential adverse effects may be avoided or minimized through mitigation measures, and alternatives to the proposed project in light of the Draft EIR’s purpose to provide useful and accurate information about such factors.

ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY AND CLIMATE IMPACTS
In accordance with CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines, the City of Berkeley Planning and Development Department has prepared a Draft EIR for the proposed project that evaluates the potential environmental effects of adoption and implementation of the proposed zoning, General Plan, and West Berkeley Plan amendments, as well as the Potential Berkeley Forge Development to the extent site planning details have been provided. The City is the Lead Agency for the proposed project and is represented by the Planning and Development Department. An NOA of a Draft EIR was published on October 21, 2024 and the Draft EIR was posted to the City’s website on that date. The public comment period for the Draft EIR ends on December 5, 2024.

NEXT STEPS
The Planning Commission recommendation will be forwarded to the City Council. The Council will consider comments from the Planning Commission and the public on these documents, and will consider taking action to:
• Adopt the M-RD zoning, West Berkeley Plan and General Plan amendments; and • Certify a Final EIR (which will include responses to CEQA-related comments on the Draft EIR submitted during the public comment period (October 21, 2024 to December 5, 2024).

Pacific Steel Casting: Zoning, General Plan and West Berkeley Plan Amendments, Draft EIR Hearing Item 10

Should the proposed zoning and General Plan amendments be approved and the environmental document certified by City Council, it is anticipated that an application to redevelop the area, similar to the Potential Berkeley Forge Development referred to in this report and in the Draft EIR, would be submitted to the Planning and Development Department for review and action through the typical permitting process. These subsequent permit application(s) would set forth specific development parameters, configuration, allocation and mix of uses proposed, and related site planning details.

The permit application(s) would also need to comply with the relevant and applicable requirements, standards, guidelines and policies of the Zoning Ordinance and General Plan, as amended, and be reviewed and acted on by the relevant City Boards and Commissions.

CONTACT PERSON
Ashley James, Senior Planner, Planning and Development Department, 510-981-7458

ATTACHMENTS

1. Planning Commission Resolution 2024-03
a. Exhibit A: Proposed Zoning Ordinance Amendments
b. Exhibit B: Proposed West Berkeley Plan Amendments
c. Exhibit C: Proposed General Plan Amendments

2. City Council Referral to the Planning Commission to Establish a Zoning Overlay at the Pacific Steel Casting Property, April 20, 2021

3. Zoning Map Amendment Application (PLN2022-0079), October 25, 2022

4. Planning Commission Staff Reports, February 1, 2023 and March 1, 2023

5. Gilman Gateway Draft EIR

6. Notice of Availability

7. Notice of Preparation

8. Public Hearing Notice

ATTACHMENT 7

NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING

BERKELEY CITY COUNCIL

CERTIFICATION OF THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT

AND ADOPTION OF RELATED CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL

QUALITY ACT (CEQA) FINDINGS, A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING

CONSIDERATIONS, MITIGATION MEASURES, AND A MITIGATION
MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM; AND APPROVAL AND

ADOPTION OF ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENTS TO ESTABLISH

THE MANUFACTURING, RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT,

AND ASSOCIATED WEST BERKELEY PLAN AND GENERAL PLAN

AMENDMENTS
The public may participate in this hearing by remote video or in-person.

The Department of Planning and Development is proposing that the City Council:

1. Adopt a first reading of an Ordinance amending Title 23 of the Berkeley Municipal Code and the Zoning Map to establish the Manufacturing, Research & Development (M-RD) zoning district to encourage redevelopment of the former Pacific Steel Casting (PSC) site.

2. Adopt a resolution to:

A. Certify the Environmental Impact Report and Adopt related California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) findings, a statement of overriding considerations, mitigation measures, and a mitigation monitoring and reporting program; and
B. Approve and adopt West Berkeley Plan and General Plan amendments to be consistent with the associated Ordinance amendments.

The proposed zoning ordinance amendments would add the M-RD district to the list of zoning districts (BMC 23.108.020), add the permit thresholds for uses in the M-RD district to the allowed land use table in manufacturing districts (23.206.020(A)), add new floor area permit requirements within the M-RD district (23.206.030), add tenant space reconfiguration requirements within the M-RD district (23.206.030), revise use-specific regulations to include requirements for uses in the M-RD district (23.206.040), revise use- specific regulations in the MU-LI district (23.206.080(B)), revise the permit findings in manufacturing districts (23.206.100), add a new section – Manufacturing, Research and Development district – including purposes and development standards (23.206.100), revise the permit findings in manufacturing districts (23.206.110), add regulations for outdoor uses in the M-RD district (23.302.020(E), revise permit findings for food service establishments in the M-RD district (23.302.070(E)(4), add regulations for parking lots/structures in the M-RD district (23.302.070(G), add regulations for off-street parking in the M-RD district (23.322.030(C), add regulations for off-street loading spaces in the M- RD district (23.322.100(A) and (B).

The proposed zoning ordinance amendments would apply to all parcels bordered by Gilman Street to the north, the Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR) and Amtrak heavy rail corridor to the east, Page Street to the south, and Interstate 80 [I-80]/Interstate 580 [I-580]) to the west, currently zoned Manufacturing (M). The zoning map is available online:
https://berkeley.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=2c7dfafbb1f64e159f 4fdf28a52f51c6&showLayers=Berkeley%20Parcels;Base%20Data;Planning%20and%20 Building
Each affected APN and address are listed below:

APN Address
59-2344-1-2 1305 Eastshore Highway
59-2341-4 1401 Eastshore Highway
59-2340-8-2 1421 Second Street
59-2341-5 1420 Second Street
59-2344-4-1 1320 Second Street
59-2344-3-1 1314 Second Street
59-2345-9 1333 Second Street
59-2345-2-2 1310 Third Street
59-2345-1 1311 Second Street;
630 Gilman Street;
640 Gilman Street
59-2344-7 1331 Eastshore Highway
59-2344-5-1 1330 Second Street
59-2345-8-1 1337 Second Street
59-2345-6-1 635 Camelia Street
59-2345-4 643 Camelia Street
58-2345-2-1 1306 Third Street
59-2344-2-1 600 Gilman Street
59-2341-3-2 1433 Eastshore Highway
59-2345-7 631 Camelia Street
625 Camelia Street
The hearing will be held on March 25, 2025 at 6:00 pm in the School District Board Room, located at 1231 Addison Street, Berkeley CA 94702.

A copy of the agenda material for this hearing will be available on the City’s website at https://berkeleyca.gov/ as of March 13, 2025. Once posted, the agenda for this meeting will include a link for public participation using Zoom video technology, as well as any health and safety requirements for in-person attendance.

For further information, please contact Ashley James, Senior Planner, Department of Planning and Development at 510-981-7458.

Written comments should be mailed or delivered directly to the City Clerk, 2180 Milvia Street, Berkeley, CA 94704, or e-mailed to
[email protected] in order to ensure
delivery to all Councilmembers and inclusion in the agenda packet.

Communications to the Berkeley City Council are public record and will become part of the City’s electronic records, which are accessible through the City’s website. Please note: e-mail addresses, names, addresses, and other contact information are not required, but if included in any communication to the City Council, will become part of the public record. If you do not want your e-mail address or any other contact information to be made public, you may deliver communications via U.S. Postal Service or in person to the City Clerk. If you do not want your contact information included in the public record, please do not include that information in your communication. Please contact the City Clerk at (510) 981-6900 or [email protected] for further information.

Published: March 14, 2025 – The Berkeley Voice
Public Hearing required by BMC 23.412.050, 22.040.020(A) and Govt Code 65853, 65355; notice provided according to Govt Code 65090 and BMC 23.404.040. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ I hereby certify that the Notice for this Public Hearing of the Berkeley City Council was posted at the display case located near the walkway in front of the Maudelle Shirek Building, 2134 Martin Luther King Jr. Way, as well as on the City’s website, on March 13, 2025.
__________________________________
Mark Numainville, City Clerk

Office of the City Manager
2180 Milvia Street, Berkeley, CA 94704 ● Tel: (510) 981-7000 ● TDD: (510) 981-6903 ● Fax: (510) 981-7099 E-Mail: [email protected] Website: http://www.CityofBerkeley.info/Manager

PUBLIC HEARING
March 25, 2025
To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
From: Paul Buddenhagen, City Manager
Submitted by: Jordan Klein, Director, Planning & Development Department Subject: ZAB Appeal: 3000 Shattuck Avenue, Use Permit #ZP2022-0046

RECOMMENDATION
Conduct a public hearing and, upon conclusion, adopt a Resolution affirming the Zoning Adjustments Board (ZAB) decision to approve a Use Permit to demolish a gas station, and construct a 10-story (114 feet) mixed-use building utilizing a State Density Bonus request, with 166 dwellings, including 17 Very Low-Income units, and 1,000 square-feet of commercial space, and dismiss the appeals.

SUMMARY
On May 11, 2023 ZAB approved the Use Permit for 3000 Shattuck Avenue authorizing construction of the mixed-use multifamily building. The ZAB approval was appealed to the City Council by three parties: a law firm representing Laborers International Union of North America, Local Union 304; 34 people who own or lease property within 300 feet of the project site; and a law firm representing East Bay Residents for Responsible Development.

The appellants have identified alleged issues with the environmental review of the project.

The City’s responses to appellants’ contentions are set forth below.

FISCAL IMPACTS OF RECOMMENDATION
None.

CURRENT SITUATION AND ITS EFFECTS
A Use Permit application was submitted for this site in 2015 (ZP2015-0229). An Initial Study-Negative Declaration (IS-ND) was prepared for a five-story project with 44 dwelling units, 17 off-street parking spaces, and 6,000 square feet of commercial space.

The project was revised by ZAB to 23 units, 6 parking spaces, and 3,522 square feet of commercial space. The revised project was approved by Council, and the IS-ND was adopted by Council on November 27, 2018. The project was not pursued.

On December 14, 2021, Isaiah Stackhouse submitted a complete Preliminary Application to vest development rights for the proposed project at 3000 Shattuck Avenue pursuant to Senate Bill (SB) 330, the Housing Crisis Act of 2019 (Government Code Sections 65941.1 and 66300), for a housing development project.

ZAB Appeal: 3000 Shattuck Avenue PUBLIC HEARING
Use Permit #ZP2022-0046 March 25, 2025

On March 29, 2022, Isaiah Stackhouse submitted an application for a Use Permit (ZP2022-0046) to construct a ten-story, mixed-use building with 166 dwelling units, 1,043 square feet of ground floor commercial space, and no off-street car parking spaces, using a State Density Bonus.

On July 8, 2022, the applicant submitted a letter from their attorney requesting an Addendum to the previous IS-ND for the five-story project, per CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 and 15164. On July 29, 2022 staff agreed to move forward with an Addendum because the new project is not substantially different from the previous project.

On August 3, 2022, the use permit application was deemed complete.

On January 27, 2023, an Addendum to the 2018 IS-ND was published.

On April 27, 2023, staff posted the public hearing notice of the ZAB hearing at the site and six nearby locations, and mailed notices to property owners and occupants within 300 feet of the project site, and to all registered neighborhood groups that cover this area.

On May 5, 2023, the applicant submitted a second Preliminary Application to vest development rights for the proposed project at 3000 Shattuck Avenue pursuant to Senate Bill (SB) 330, the Housing Crisis Act of 2019 (Government Code Sections 65941.1 and 66300), for a housing development project, superseding the previous preliminary application.

On May 11, 2023, ZAB conducted a public hearing for the Use Permit. After receiving public comment, ZAB approved the Use Permit by a vote of 8-0-0-1 (Yes: Duffy, Gaffney, Lunaparra, O’Keefe, Sanderson, Thompson, Tregub, Yung; No: None; Abstain: None; Absent: Kahn).

On May 18, 2023, staff issued the ZAB Notice of Decision. The City Clerk received three separate appeals on May 25, May 31, and June 1, 2023. The City Clerk scheduled the appeal hearing for September 26, 2023. Appellants were informed of the hearing date by letter on June 15, 2023.

In August 2023, the appeal hearing was delayed so that the City’s CEQA consultant could revise the Addendum. On January 10, 2025, the City Clerk notified the appellants of the new Council hearing, March 25, 2025.

On or before March 11, 2025, staff posted the public hearing notice of the Council hearing at the site and six nearby locations, and mailed notices to property owners and occupants within 300 feet of the project site, to all registered neighborhood groups that cover this area, interested parties who requested notice, and the appellants. The Council must conduct a public hearing to resolve the appeals.

ZAB Appeal: 3000 Shattuck Avenue PUBLIC HEARING
Use Permit #ZP2022-0046 March 25, 2025

BACKGROUND
The project site is located on the southwest corner of Ashby Avenue and Shattuck Avenue. The surrounding area consists of a mix of commercial and residential development ranging from one to three stories in height. The Ashby BART station is 0.3 miles to the west. In addition, bus service is available via AC Transit routes 18 and 800.

The 14,000-square-foot project site comprises two parcels (Figure 1), and is currently developed with a gas station that includes a mini-market with an office, car repair services, smog test center, two gas station canopies with pump islands, and surface parking for 11 automobiles (Figure 2). Site access to is provided from both Ashby and Shattuck Avenues.

Figure 1: Zoning Map

ZAB Appeal: 3000 Shattuck Avenue PUBLIC HEARING
Use Permit #ZP2022-0046 March 25, 2025

Figure 2: Current conditions, facing southwest (Google Street View, 2024) The proposed project would demolish the existing commercial buildings, remove the existing paving and the curb cuts, and construct a new 10-story mixed-use building with:
 166 dwelling units (all studio units) for a total of 166 bedrooms;  Commercial space: 1,043 square feet in area, for one tenant on the ground floor at the northwest corner of the property;
 Two bicycle storage rooms on the ground floor with storage for 62 bicycles, and five short-term bicycle parking spaces along Shattuck Avenue and Ashby Avenue;  Residential access from Shattuck Avenue;
 New street trees along Shattuck Avenue and Ashby Avenue;  Useable open space totaling 8,516 square feet consisting of ground level space and a roof deck.

The project is eligible for a Density Bonus under Government Code Section 65915, by providing 17 Very Low-Income units (15 percent of the base project) on site, and qualifies for a 50 percent density bonus, or 56 bonus units, of which 55 are utilized, resulting in a 166-unit density bonus project, with waivers to:
1) FAR. Exceed the Floor Area Ratio (FAR) limit from 4.0 to 6.0 2) Height. Exceed the building height limit from 36 feet and 3 stories to 113 feet 10 inches and 10 stories
3) Front Setback. Reduce the required front setback from 15 feet to 2 feet 6 inches 4) Rear Setback. Reduce the required rear setback from 15 feet to 11 feet 3 inches 5) Side Setback (street). Reduce the required street side (left side) setback from 6 feet to 15 feet (varies by story) to zero feet
6) Side Setback (interior) Reduce the required interior side (right side) setback from 4 feet to 12 feet (varies by story) to 5 feet 7 inches
7) Lot Coverage. Exceed the lot coverage limit from 40 percent to 62 percent

ZAB Appeal: 3000 Shattuck Avenue PUBLIC HEARING
Use Permit #ZP2022-0046 March 25, 2025

On May 5, 2023, the applicant submitted a new SB 330 preliminary development project application, superseding the preliminary housing development project application submitted in December 2021. Submittal of all the information listed in the pre-application form and payment of the permit processing fee froze development standards and fee rates as of May 5, 2023, unless exceptions per Government Code § 65889.5(o) are triggered. The May 5, 2023 vesting date affects the Affordable Housing Mitigation Fee and inclusionary housing requirements. The affordable housing conditions were revised to require compliance with all applicable provisions of Berkeley Municipal Code (BMC) Chapter 23.328, Inclusionary Housing, and Council Resolution 70,698-N.S., rather than BMC Section 22.20.065, Affordable Housing Mitigation Fee, in effect in December 2021.

The new vesting date did not change the Use Permit project.

In 2015, a different Use Permit was submitted for the site, ZP2015-0229. An IS-ND was prepared for that project in 2017, and adopted by Council in 2018. The IS-ND was prepared for a five-story project with 44 dwelling units, 17 off-street parking spaces, and 6,000 square feet of commercial space.

In May 2022, staff informed the applicant that a new IS was required for the current project since the site is on a list pursuant to Section 15300.2(e) of the CEQA Guidelines. The applicant submitted a letter from their attorney requesting an Addendum to the previous IS-ND for the five-story project, per CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 and 15164. The conditions in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162(3)(A) and (D) requiring preparation of a subsequent Environmental Impact Report (EIR) were not met.

Staff agreed to move forward with an Addendum because the new project is not substantially different from the previous project. The new project is taller and denser, and contains no off-street car parking, and less commercial space, but the proposed land uses would remain the same, and the project would continue to comply with the BMC and General Plan. See Table 1 for a comparison of the current project and the project analyzed in the 2018 IS-ND.

ZAB Appeal: 3000 Shattuck Avenue PUBLIC HEARING
Use Permit #ZP2022-0046 March 25, 2025

Table 1: Comparison of the Current Project and the Project in the 2018 IS-ND In January 2023 an Addendum to the 2018 IS-ND was published. The Addendum found that potential impacts associated with the modified project are consistent with potential impacts characterized and mitigated for in the 2018 IS-ND. Substantive revisions to the 2018 Final IS-ND were not necessary because no new significant impacts or significant impacts of substantially greater severity were identified.

After the Addendum was published, the applicant modified the plans to reduce the size of the commercial area by 52 square feet, increased upper floor residential floors by 33 square feet each, and reduced setbacks slightly to accommodate the floor area change.

On May 5, 2023 the City’s CEQA consultant provided a memorandum to analyze whether the modifications affect the analysis or conclusions of the Addendum. The consultant found that the changes would not result in new or substantially increased impacts compared to the project studied in the original IS-ND, and the changes did not warrant changes to the Addendum.

On May 11, 2023 the CEQA consultant submitted a second memorandum in response to a letter submitted to ZAB by the law firm of Adams Broadwell Joseph and Cardozo,

ZAB Appeal: 3000 Shattuck Avenue PUBLIC HEARING
Use Permit #ZP2022-0046 March 25, 2025

on behalf of East Bay Residents for Responsible Development (“East Bay RRD”). The memorandum addressed potential errors in the California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod) emissions modeling used as a basis for the air quality analysis. The consultant revised the modeling, including revising the construction duration to be consistent with the applicant-provided 18-month construction schedule, and adding a demolition phase with estimated air pollutant emissions from truck trips to remove on- site structures and asphalt. The modified project’s impacts would be below the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) thresholds of significance. Therefore, the modified project’s air quality impacts would be less than significant, consistent with the conclusions of the Addendum.

The Addendum’s conclusions were not affected by the additional analysis provided in the corrections. ZAB found the project to be compliant with all applicable, objective general plan and zoning standards, and without specific adverse impacts to public health or safety, and approved it on May 11, 2023 without reductions to the project’s density, pursuant to the State Housing Accountability Act (HAA), Government Code Section 65589.5(j).1 ZAB also adopted an Addendum to the Initial Study-Negative Declaration, with revisions to the air quality modeling (memorandum dated May 11, 2023), revised the affordable housing conditions to comply with the new ordinance, and added conditions to require the applicant to meet with concerned neighbors, to update the floor plans to conform with the renderings, and to provide native plantings as part of the project landscape plans. For additional project background, please see Attachment 6, the May 11, 2023 ZAB staff report for this project.

In response to the appeal letters received after ZAB approval, the City’s consultant revised the Addendum (Attachment 1, Exhibit C), and provided a Response to Appeal Comments (Attachment 5) where they highlight revisions to the Addendum. The conclusion of the revised Addendum is the same as the 2023 Addendum: no further evaluation of environmental impacts is required for the modified project, no subsequent EIR is necessary pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, and the Addendum is the appropriate level of environmental analysis and documentation for the modified project pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15164.

RATIONALE FOR RECOMMENDATION
The issues raised in the appellants’ letters and staff’s responses follow. There are three appeal letters to consider for this hearing and the appeal points are presented in the order that the letters were received. For the sake of brevity, the appeal issues are not 1 The Housing Accountability Act (HAA), Government Code Section 65589.5(j), requires that when a proposed housing development complies with the applicable, objective general plan and zoning standards, but a local agency proposes to deny the project or approve it only if the density is reduced, the agency must base its decision on written findings supported by substantial evidence that the development would have a specific adverse impact on public health or safety unless disapproved, or approved at a lower density; and there is no feasible method to satisfactorily mitigate or avoid the specific adverse impact, other than the disapproval, or approval at a lower density.

ZAB Appeal: 3000 Shattuck Avenue PUBLIC HEARING
Use Permit #ZP2022-0046 March 25, 2025

re-stated in their entirety. Please refer to the attached appeal letters for the full text; Attachments 2 through 4 of this report.

Appeal Letter 1 was submitted by the law firm of Lozeau Drury LLP on behalf of Laborers International Union of North America, Local Union 304 (“LiUNA”) LiUNA Appeal - Issue 1: California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) compliance.

The Appellant asserts that the Addendum to the 2018 Initial Study-Negative Declaration (IS-ND) was not appropriate for this review because new evidence has been submitted and the IS-ND failed to consider it. (Appeal Letter 1, Attachment 2, pages 1-2).

Response: CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 “Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations” identifies three criteria that would require an updated document to be prepared.

1. Substantial changes are proposed which will require major revisions of the previous negative declaration due to new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects.

Project components such as the height and density for the project have changed, but existing conditions at the site are the same (differences between the previous project and the current project are discussed in Table 1 above, in the Addendum, and in the ZAB staff report). Increasing the height and number of units does not change the environmental impacts of this mixed-use residential project. For example, in terms of air quality, operational emissions would remain below BAAQMD thresholds, and the project does not include new facilities that would emit substantial quantities of toxic air contaminants. As discussed in the Addendum, the modified project would not introduce new, significant environmental impacts beyond those that have already been identified and characterized in the 2018 Final IS-ND.

2. Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous negative declaration due to new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects.

The modified project, like the original project described in the 2018 Final IS-ND, is a proposed mixed-use development in Berkeley, and is on the same project site as the original project. The circumstances under which the project is undertaken have not changed. The project is still a mixed-use residential development by a private entity.

Most of the environmental conditions described in the 2018 Final IS-ND are substantially unchanged. Several new buildings in the vicinity of the project site have either been constructed, are approved, or are pending approval, and those changes are expected in an urban area. As discussed in the Addendum, there are no substantial changes in the project or circumstances.

ZAB Appeal: 3000 Shattuck Avenue PUBLIC HEARING
Use Permit #ZP2022-0046 March 25, 2025

3. New information of substantial importance, which was not known or could not have been known when the ND was adopted, shows any of the following:

A. The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the ND.

B. Significant effects will be substantially more severe.

C. Mitigation measures previously found not feasible would be feasible, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measures.

D. Mitigation measures which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measures.

An EIR was not required for the previous project, so many of the conditions identified in the appeal point above do not apply. The Addendum discussed the impacts of the proposed project in terms of the twenty environmental issue areas suggested by the CEQA Guidelines and found that potential impacts associated with the modified project are consistent with potential impacts characterized in the IS-ND. As discussed in the Addendum, impacts of the modified project would be less than significant, and thus A. and B. above do not apply. C. and D. do not apply because there were no mitigation measures attached to the previous project.

Staff prepared an Addendum, with the help of an environmental consultant, because the project site has not changed since the IS-ND was prepared. The Addendum evaluated the changes under the modified project in comparison to the original project, against CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, and found the potential impacts associated with the modified project to be consistent with the potential impacts discussed and mitigated for in the 2018 IS-ND. Conditions requiring preparation of an EIR or subsequent ND were not met.

LiUNA Appeal - Issue 2: Air quality and CEQA. The appellant states that composite wood materials in the interior of the new building will off-gas carcinogens, the project may result in significant Reactive Organic Gas (ROG) emissions which exceed BAAQMD thresholds, the Addendum underestimates the Project’s emissions by altering the estimated construction length and not including demolition, and the Addendum and IS-ND do not analyze air quality impacts that will result from trucking modular units to the project site. These are all significant impacts under CEQA (Appeal Letter 1, Attachment 2, page 2).

Response 2: The issue of Air Quality is stated several times in the appeal related to indoor air quality, Reactive Organic Gas emissions, and vehicle emissions.

Indoor Air Quality. Natural and mechanical ventilation is required for new buildings under the California Buildings Standard Code, and during plan check review City staff

ZAB Appeal: 3000 Shattuck Avenue PUBLIC HEARING
Use Permit #ZP2022-0046 March 25, 2025

will verify that the project meets all requirements of the code. Volatile Organic Compounds may affect people living in new buildings, but they will not affect people who live and work in the area surrounding the project site. Section 4.3, Air Quality, of the Addendum has been revised to include a discussion of indoor air emissions of formaldehyde, to address this appeal point. The analysis concludes that the modified project would have less than significant impacts on formaldehyde.

Reactive Organic Gas (ROG) Emissions. The appellant states that the modified project may result in potentially significant ROG emissions which would exceed Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) thresholds. In response to this comment, Section 4.3, Air Quality, of the Addendum has been revised to include a discussion of air quality emissions modeling (CalEEMod) methodology and ROG emissions (Attachment 1 Exhibit C and Attachment 5). Per the data provided in the 2023 Addendum, and the 2025 Addendum, the project would not exceed BAAQMD thresholds for ROG emissions.

Construction and Demolition Emissions. The City’s consultant, Rincon Consultants, revised the emission modeling in May 2023 to change the construction duration to be consistent with the applicant-provided 18-month construction schedule and added a demolition phase. The revised modeling found the project’s impacts to still be below BAAQMD thresholds of significance. Rincon prepared a memo which discussed the revised modeling results, which was provided to ZAB as a supplemental item before the May 11, 2023 ZAB meeting.

Emissions from Trucking Modular Units. As stated in the Addendum, the building may be built using modular construction. In modular construction, standardized components are built off-site, and then assembled into a building on-site. The Addendum has been revised to include a discussion of air quality impacts resulting from the trucking of modular units to the project site, to address this appeal point. The analysis concludes that site preparation and air quality would still be substantially the same as for traditional construction.

LiUNA Appeal - Issue 3: Hazardous materials and CEQA. Appellants assert that since the site is in the State Water Resources Control Board’s Geotracker database, the site will need to be studied to determine if it is safe for residential development, and “this is a previously undisclosed significant impact which must be addressed” by a Mitigated Negative Declaration or an EIR (Appeal Letter 1, Attachment 2, page 2).

Response 3: The project site is in the State Water Resources Control Board’s Geotracker database, is listed as a LUST (Leaking Underground Storage Tank) Cleanup Site, and was marked as “case closed” in 2013 and 2014. Phase I and Phase II Environmental Site Assessments were conducted in 2022, and soil and groundwater conditions related to hazardous materials have remained unchanged since the IS-ND

ZAB Appeal: 3000 Shattuck Avenue PUBLIC HEARING
Use Permit #ZP2022-0046 March 25, 2025

was prepared, and the Addendum did not identify any increased or new significant impact as a result. The proposed project is required to comply with standard Conditions of Approval (COAs) for remediation or removal of toxic materials in preparation for residential development, which include a requirement for a soil and groundwater management plan (Attachment 1, Exhibit A, COA 26) in accordance with Berkeley Municipal Code Section 15.12.100, the stormwater pollution prevention requirements of the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board’s Order No. R2-2009- 0074, California hazardous waste generator regulations (Title 22 California Code of Regulations (CCR) 66260 et seq.), and the East Bay Municipal Utility District’s Ordinance 311.

LiUNA Appeal - Issue 4: Air quality and detriment. Appellants assert that the project may be detrimental because the Addendum does not mitigate the project’s detrimental impacts to air quality (Appeal Letter 1, Attachment 2, page 3).

Response 4: As outlined in Section 4.3, Air Quality, of the Addendum, the modified project’s estimated air pollutant emissions would not exceed BAAQMD’s thresholds and impacts related to criteria air pollutants or contribution to a cumulative air quality impact would be less than significant. In addition, compliance with the City’s standard condition of approval, Air Quality – Diesel Particulate Matter Controls During Construction, as well as proximity to alternative transportation would ensure that impacts related to construction and operational toxic air contaminants (TACs) are less than significant.

Therefore, no significant new or substantially increased air quality impacts would result from the modified project.

BMC Section 23.406.040(E) discusses the Findings for Approval required for all Use Permits, and addresses detriment. These findings are colloquially referred to as “non- detriment findings.” The BMC requires findings of non-detriment for approval of discretionary permits. However, non-detriment findings are not objective standards, and cannot provide a basis for denial of (or reduction in density for) a housing project, due to the HAA. The City cannot deny or reduce the density of a housing development that is compliant with objective standards, unless it can meet the strict finding of specific adverse impact2 on public health or safety – a level of impact which the State Department of Housing and Community Development considers to be rare.3 ZAB approved the project in accordance with SB 330 and HAA. 2 Per Government Code Section 65589.5(d)(2), a “specific, adverse impact” means “a significant, quantifiable, direct, and unavoidable impact, based on objective, identified written public health or safety standards, policies, or conditions as they existed on the date the application was deemed complete.” 3 Housing Accountability Act Technical Assistance Advisory (Government Code Section 65589.5), page 20; State Department of Housing and Community Development.

ZAB Appeal: 3000 Shattuck Avenue PUBLIC HEARING
Use Permit #ZP2022-0046 March 25, 2025

Appeal Letter 2 was submitted by Larisa Cummings, Paul Dillingham, Dave Auerbach, Lynn Cooper, and Les Shipnuck, and signed by 29 others who own or lease property within 300 feet of the project site, for a total of 34 signatories.

Appeal by 34 Signatories - Issue 1: The City failed to perform cumulative impact analysis, and an Initial Study rather than an Addendum is required for the modified project (Appeal Letter 2, Attachment 3, pages 1-3).

Response 1: Section 4.15, Changes in the Environmental Setting and Cumulative Impacts, has been added to the revised Addendum to address this appeal point, and includes an analysis of cumulative impacts that may result from the project. Eight cumulative development projects within two miles of the modified project were analyzed.

The revised Addendum concludes that the modified project would not result in cumulatively considerable impacts for any issue area and impacts would be less than significant.

An Initial Study was prepared for the original project in 2018. As discussed in Section 3 of the Addendum, Decision Not to Prepare Subsequent Negative Declaration or EIR, pursuant to Section 15164 of the CEQA Guidelines a lead agency shall prepare an Addendum to a previously certified negative declaration if some changes or additions are necessary. However, none of the conditions described in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 that call for preparation of a subsequent EIR or negative declaration have occurred. See the response to the LiUNA Appeal - Issue 1.

Appeal by 34 Signatories - Issue 2: The City did not consider input from the public when it determined whether to prepare an EIR, which is inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064(c) (Appeal Letter 2, Attachment 3, page 2).

Response 2: CEQA Guidelines Section 15064(c) reads:

In determining whether an effect will be adverse or beneficial, the lead agency shall consider the views held by members of the public in all areas affected as expressed in the whole record before the lead agency. Before requiring the preparation of an EIR, the lead agency must still determine whether environmental change itself might be substantial.

An Initial Study was prepared for the original project in 2018. Opportunities for public review and input for the IS-ND occurred during the public circulation period (30 days) for the IS-ND in 2017, and at the ZAB hearing in 2018. The Addendum for the modified project was released publicly for review three months prior to the ZAB hearing on May 11, 2023. As discussed in Section 3 of the Addendum, Decision Not to Prepare Subsequent Negative Declaration or EIR, pursuant to Section 15164 of the CEQA Guidelines a lead agency shall prepare an Addendum to a previously certified negative declaration if some changes or additions are necessary. However, none of the

ZAB Appeal: 3000 Shattuck Avenue PUBLIC HEARING
Use Permit #ZP2022-0046 March 25, 2025

conditions described in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 that call for preparation of a subsequent EIR or negative declaration have occurred.

Appeal by 34 Signatories - Issue 3: Appellants are concerned about traffic in the Russell-Shattuck-Ashby area because five projects are proposed, and one project is under construction. None of these projects will provide on-site loading zones, or right-of-way improvements to facilitate loading. Cumulative traffic impacts of the proposed project, other recently entitled projects, and future entitled projects must be considered (Appeal Letter 2, Attachment 3, pages 3-5, 8-9).

Response 3: Section 4.15, Changes in the Environmental Setting and Cumulative Impacts, added to the revised Addendum in response to the appeal point, analyzes the cumulative construction-related and operational transportation impact from eight development projects that are within two miles of the modified project. As discussed therein, the modified project would not result in considerable contributions to significant cumulative impacts and impacts would be less than significant. Section 4.13 of the revised Addendum, Transportation, includes a discussion of construction traffic impacts in response to the appeal point. The modified project would be required to comply with the City’s Standard Condition of Approval, Transportation Construction Plan, which would require preparation of a Transportation Construction Plan for all phases of construction in order to minimize impacts related to construction traffic.

Traffic impact analysis is not required for projects located within a quarter mile of a “high-quality transit corridor4” or a half mile from a “major transit stop5.” Because this site is within a third of a mile from a major transit stop (Ashby BART station), no traffic impact analysis is required for the City’s review and consideration. Off-street parking for the residential and commercial uses is not required for this site per BMC Section

23.322.030(B)(1) and Assembly Bill 2097. On-site loading spaces are not required because the commercial use is less than 10,000 square-feet.

Land Use Planning does not regulate on-street loading spaces. The applicant has been informed that CalTrans would not support a loading zone along the Ashby Avenue portion of the project. A loading zone on the Shattuck Avenue side of the project would not be feasible because AC Transit plans to move the bus stop at the northwest corner of Shattuck and Ashby to the southwest corner of the intersection along the project frontage. The City’s Transportation staff has indicated that they would not support adding an on-street loading space if it would require removing on-street parking. 4 Defined in Public Resources Code 21155 as corridor with fixed route bus service with service intervals no longer than 15 minutes during peak commute hours.
5 Defined in CEQA Section 21064.3 as a site containing a rail transit station, a ferry terminal served by either a bus or rail transit service, or the intersection of two or more major bus routes with a frequency of service interval of 15 minutes or less during the morning and afternoon peak commute periods.

ZAB Appeal: 3000 Shattuck Avenue PUBLIC HEARING
Use Permit #ZP2022-0046 March 25, 2025

This project, like other projects adding ten or more dwelling units, is required to comply with the City’s Transportation Demand Management (TDM) requirements. COA 61 in Attachment 1 Exhibit A describes the TDM requirements for this project.

Appeal by 34 Signatories - Issue 4: Changes to the previously approved project.

Appellants assert that the current project is different from the previously proposed project, and thus the construction duration and foundation work should not be the same or similar, and lead the appellants to doubt data in the Addendum (Appeal Letter 2, Attachment 3, pages 3, 10).

Response 4: As discussed under Issue 1 of the LiUNA Appeal, although project components have changed, the modified project would not introduce new, significant environmental impacts beyond those that have already been identified and characterized in the 2018 Final IS-ND. Information on the construction duration and foundation work is from the applicant, and they have consulted their general contractor.

Appeal by 34 Signatories - Issue 5: ZAB rushed approval of the project (Appeal Letter 2, Attachment 3, page 5).

Response 5: The appellants state that a vote on the project was not required at the May 11, 2023 ZAB meeting because it was only the second meeting on the project after it was deemed complete. Per Government Code Section 65905.5(a) if a proposed housing development project complies with the applicable, objective general plan and zoning standards in affect at the time an application is deemed complete, then the city shall not conduct more than five hearings in connection with the approval of that housing development project. This includes all public hearings in connection with the approval of the housing development project and any continuances of such public hearings. The city must consider and either approve or disapprove the project at any of the five hearings consistent with applicable timelines under the Permit Streamlining Act.

An appeal to City Council is included in the five-meeting count.

After hearing all public comments, and considering all of the evidence on the record at the May 11, 2023 hearing, ZAB determined that the project meets all applicable objective planning standards pursuant to SB 330, the HAA, and the CEQA Guidelines, and approved the project. ZAB did not move to continue the hearing to another meeting for additional discussion.

Appeal Letter 3 was submitted by the law firm of Adams Broadwell Joseph and Cardozo, on behalf of East Bay Residents for Responsible Development (“East Bay RRD”). The appeal points that follow are largely based on summaries of points within the appeal letter, and not on specific numbers used in the appeal letter.

East Bay RRD Appeal - Issue 1: CEQA compliance. The Addendum did not accurately disclose the project’s potentially significant impacts to air quality,

ZAB Appeal: 3000 Shattuck Avenue PUBLIC HEARING
Use Permit #ZP2022-0046 March 25, 2025

public health, hazardous contamination, land use, and cumulative impacts (Appeal Letter 3, Attachment 4, page 3).

Response 1: See previous responses to LiUNA Appeal Issue 1 for why an Addendum is appropriate for the modified project; LiUNA Appeal Issues 2 and 4 for Air Quality and public health; LiUNA Appeal Issue 3 for Hazardous Materials; and 34 Signatories, Issue 1 for Cumulative Impacts.

As discussed in Section 4.8 of the Addendum, Land Use and Planning, the modified project would not alter the land uses proposed in the original project and would be consistent with the Avenue Commercial designation, which is characterized by “pedestrian-oriented commercial development and multifamily residential structures” and General Plan policies. The modified project would comply with State Density Bonus requirements and therefore qualifies for waivers for height, setbacks, and FAR. It also complies with all other development standards, and would comply with the City’s Inclusionary Housing Ordinance. Therefore, the modified project would be consistent with land use regulations such as General Plan policies and the BMC.

East Bay RRD Appeal - Issue 2: The site is contaminated with benzene and the Addendum does not contain a new analysis of existing contamination levels and does not include mitigation requiring the site to be cleaned so that it is safe for residential use (Appeal Letter 3, Attachment 4, page 3).

Response 2: See response to Issue 3 of the LiUNA Appeal regarding impacts related to Hazardous Materials.

East Bay RRD Appeal - Issue 3: Air quality. The proposed project will exceed ROG emission thresholds (Appeal Letter 3, Attachment 4, page 3).

Response 3:

See response to Issue 2 of the LiUNA Appeal for Air Quality.

East Bay RRD Appeal - Issue 4: Impacts associated with the construction and operation of the project and recent development in the vicinity constitute cumulative impacts, and the Addendum did not analyze these cumulative impacts (Appeal Letter 3, Attachment 4, page 3).

Response 4: See response to Issue 1 of the Appeal by 34 Signatories for Cumulative Impacts.

East Bay RRD Appeal - Issue 5: The appellant asserts that an EIR is required because the project has substantially changed from the 2018 project, with more dwellings and square footage, which will lead more severe construction and operational impacts, and there is new evidence that emissions may be significant (Appeal Letter 3, Attachment 4, pages 4, 9).

ZAB Appeal: 3000 Shattuck Avenue PUBLIC HEARING
Use Permit #ZP2022-0046 March 25, 2025

Response 5: See responses to Issue 1 and Issue 2 of the LiUNA Appeal, why an Addendum is appropriate for the modified project, and Air Quality.

East Bay RRD Appeal - Issue 6: Environmental impacts and detriment. The appellant states that the public health and safety impacts of the current project may be detrimental (Appeal Letter 3, Attachment 4, pages 20-21).

Response 6: The ZAB determined that the project is compliant with all vested and applicable objective General Plan and C-SA Zoning District standards. See the responses to Issue 1, why an Addendum is appropriate for the modified project, and Issue 4 of the LiUNA Appeal, Air Quality, and Issue 1 of the Appeal by 34 Signatories, Cumulative Impacts.

East Bay RRD Appeal - Issue 7: Labor and detriment. The appellants assert that the project may be detrimental because the applicant has not committed to building with a local, “skilled and trained workforce,” and will not provide apprenticeship training opportunities, healthcare, or other workforce benefits for City of Berkeley or East Bay residents (Appeal Letter 3, Attachment 4, pages 20- 21). The applicant should comply with the HARD HATS ordinance (Appeal Letter 3, Attachment 4, page 25).

Response 7: See the response to Issue 4 of the LiUNA Appeal for a discussion of detriment.

This appeal point appears to request application of the City’s HARD HATS ordinance, BMC Chapter 13.107. However, this Use Permit application is not subject to the ordinance because the SB 330 vesting date was May 5, 2023, and thus the zoning, design, subdivision, and fee requirements in effect as of May 5, 2023 will remain in effect for the remainder of the entitlement and permitting process, unless exceptions per Government Code § 65889.5(o) are triggered. The HARD HATS Ordinance became effective on January 1, 2024, after the vesting date of the project. Since the HARD HATS Ordinance does not apply to the Project, compliance with provisions contained in the ordinance would be voluntary.

East Bay RRD Appeal - Issue 8: The project is inconsistent with General Plan economic development and employment policies because there is no commitment to provide construction jobs to Berkeley or East Bay residents, and no commitment to contribute to an apprenticeship or construction job training program (Appeal Letter 3, Attachment 4, pages 20, 25-27).

Response 8: General Plan goals and policies are not objective standards, and cannot provide a basis for denial of (or reduction in density for) a housing project, due to the HAA (see the response to Issue 4 of the LiUNA Appeal, detriment).

ZAB Appeal: 3000 Shattuck Avenue PUBLIC HEARING
Use Permit #ZP2022-0046 March 25, 2025

East Bay RRD Appeal - Issue 9: The project is inconsistent with the Housing Element because less than 20 percent of units will be affordable (Appeal Letter 3, Attachment 4, page 27-29).

Response 9: Since the applicant submitted a preliminary housing development project in May 2023, superseding the previous preliminary application submitted in December 2021, the project is required to comply with BMC Chapter 23.328, Inclusionary Housing.

Chapter 23.328 allows developers to pay an in-lieu fee, or a partial in-lieu fee, for providing less than 20 percent of units for rent or sale at affordable rents or prices. The building permit for the project cannot be issued until the final Affordable Housing Compliance Plan is approved, and a Regulator Agreement and Declaration of Restrictive Covenants is executed (BMC Section 32.328.050). The project will provide 17 units on-site which are affordable to Very-Low Income households.

East Bay RRD Appeal - Issue 10: ZAB rushed approval of the project (Appeal Letter 3, Attachment 4, page 5).

Response 10: See the response to Issue 5 of the Appeal by 34 Signatories, ZAB approval.

ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY
The project approved by the ZAB is found to be in compliance with all applicable State and local environmental requirements, would be located in a transit-rich area, and would be built and operated according to current codes for energy conservation, waste reduction, low toxicity, and other factors.

ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS CONSIDERED
Pursuant to BMC Section 23.410.040(G), the Council may (1) continue the public hearing, (2) reverse, affirm, or modify the ZAB’s decision, or (3) remand the matter to the ZAB.

Action Deadline:

Pursuant to BMC Section 23.410.040(I), if the disposition of the appeal has not been determined within 30 days from the date the public hearing was closed by the Council (not including Council recess), then the decision of the Board shall be deemed affirmed and the appeal shall be deemed denied.

CONTACT PERSONS
Jordan Klein, Director, Planning & Development Department, (510) 981-7534 Anne Hersch, Land Use Planning Manager, (510) 981-7411
Allison Riemer, Associate Planner, (510) 981-7433

ZAB Appeal: 3000 Shattuck Avenue PUBLIC HEARING
Use Permit #ZP2022-0046 March 25, 2025

Attachments:

1. Draft Resolution
 Exhibit A: Findings and Conditions
 Exhibit B: Project Plans, received May 2, 2023
 Exhibit C: Revised Addendum to the Initial Study-Negative Declaration, February 2025

2. Appeal Letter 1, received May 25, 2023

3. Appeal Letter 2, received May 31, 2023

4. Appeal Letter 3, received June 1, 2023

5. Response to Appeal Comments, February 2025

6. May 11, 2023 ZAB Hearing Staff Report

7. 2018 Initial Study-Negative Declaration

8. Index to Administrative Record

9. Administrative Record

10.Public Hearing Notice

RESOLUTION NO. ##,###-N.S.

AFFIRMING THE ZONING ADJUSTMENTS BOARD APPROVAL OF USE PERMIT #ZP2022-0046 TO DEMOLISH A GAS STATION, AND CONSTRUCT A 10-STORY (114 FEET) MIXED-USE BUILDING UTILIZING A DENSITY BONUS, WITH 166 DWELLINGS, INCLUDING 17 VERY LOW-INCOME UNITS, AND 1,043 SQUARE-FEET

OF COMMERCIAL SPACE, AND DISMISS THE APPEALS
WHEREAS, a Use Permit application was submitted for this site in 2015 (ZP2015-0229).

An Initial Study-Negative Declaration (IS-ND) was prepared for a five-story project with 44 dwelling units, 17 off-street parking spaces, and 6,000 square feet of commercial space. The project was revised by ZAB to 23 units, 6 parking spaces, and 3,522 square feet of commercial space. The revised project was approved by Council, and the IS-ND was adopted by Council on November 27, 2018. The project was not pursued; and WHEREAS, on December 14, 2021, Isaiah Stackhouse submitted a complete Preliminary Application to vest rights pursuant to Senate Bill (SB) 330, the Housing Crisis Act of 2019 (Government Code Sections 65941.1 and 66300), for a housing development project; and
WHEREAS, on March 29, 2022 Isaiah Stackhouse submitted an application for a Use Permit (ZP2022-0046) to construct a ten-story, mixed-use building with 166 dwelling units, 1,043 square feet of commercial space, and no off-street car parking spaces, using a State Density Bonus; and
WHEREAS, on July 8, 2022, the applicant submitted a letter from their attorney requesting an Addendum to the previous IS-ND for the five-story project, per CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 and 15164. On July 29, 2022 staff agreed to move forward with an Addendum because the new project is not substantially different from the previous project; and
WHEREAS, on August 3, 2022, the use permit application was deemed complete; and WHEREAS, on January 27, 2023 an Addendum to the 2018 IS-ND was published; and WHEREAS, on April 27, 2023, staff posted the public hearing notice of the ZAB hearing at the site and six nearby locations, and mailed notices to property owners and occupants within 300 feet of the project site, and to all registered neighborhood groups that cover this area; and
WHEREAS, on May 5, 2023, the applicant submitted a second Preliminary Application to vest development rights for the proposed project at 3000 Shattuck Avenue pursuant to Senate Bill (SB) 330, the Housing Crisis Act of 2019 (Government Code Sections 65941.1 and 66300), for a housing development project, superseding the previous preliminary application; and

WHEREAS, on May 11, 2023, the ZAB conducted a public hearing for the Use Permit.

After receiving public comment, ZAB approved the Use Permit by a vote of 8-0-0-1 (Yes:

Duffy, Gaffney, Lunaparra, O’Keefe, Sanderson, Thompson, Tregub, Yung; No: None; Abstain: None; Absent: Kahn); and
WHEREAS, on May 18, 2023, staff issued the ZAB Notice of Decision. The City Clerk received three separate appeals on May 25, May 31, and June 1, 2023. The City Clerk scheduled the appeal hearing for September 26, 2023. Appellants were informed of the hearing date by letter on June 15, 2023; and
WHEREAS, in August of 2023, the appeal hearing was delayed so that the City’s CEQA consultant could revise the Addendum. On January 10, 2025, the City Clerk notified the appellants of the new Council hearing, March 25, 2025; and WHEREAS, on or before March 11, 2025, staff posted the public hearing notice of the Council hearing at the site and six nearby locations, and mailed notices to property owners and occupants within 300 feet of the project site, to all registered neighborhood groups that cover this area, interested parties who requested notice, and the appellants; and WHEREAS, on March 25, 2025, the Council held a public hearing to consider the ZAB’s decision, and in the opinion of this Council, the facts stated in, or ascertainable from the public record, including the staff report and comments made at the public hearing, warrant approving the project.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Berkeley that the City Council hereby adopts the findings made by the ZAB in Exhibit A to affirm the decision of the ZAB to approve Use Permit #ZP2022-0046, adopts the conditions of approval in Exhibit A, adopts the project plans in Exhibit B, adopts the IS-ND Addendum in Exhibit C, and dismisses the appeals.

Exhibits
A: Findings and Conditions
B: Project Plans, received May 2, 2023
C: Addendum to the Initial Study-Negative Declaration

Exhibit A
Findings and Condition s
MAY 11, 2023
1947 Center Street, Berkeley, CA 94704 Tel: 510.981.7410 TDD: 510.981.7474 Fax: 510.981.7420 E-mai
l: [email protected]
3000 Shattuck Avenue
Use Permit #ZP2022-004
6 to demolish the existing gas station, and construct a 10-story (114 feet) mixed-use building utilizing a Density Bonus, with 166 dwellings, including 17 Very Low-Income units, and 1,043 square-feet of commercial space.

PERMITS REQUIRED
• Use Permit pursuant to Berkeley Municipal Code (BMC) Section 23.326.070(A) to demolish a non- residential main building
• Use Permit pursuant to BMC Section 23.204.100(B)(4)(b) to construct a mixed-use development of more than 5,000 square-feet
• Use Permit pursuant to BMC Section 23.204.020 to add multi-family dwellings. • Use Permit pursuant to BMC Section 23.204.100(D)(2) to modify the height and stories, setbacks, and lot coverage.
• Administrative Use Permit pursuant to BMC Section 23.304.050(A) to allow architectural features over the maximum height limit.

CONCESSIONS/WAIVERS UNDER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65915-65918 • Waiver of BMC Section 23.204.100(D)(1) to exceed the Floor Area Ratio (FAR) limit – to be 6, where 4 is the maximum
• Waiver of BMC Section 23.204.100(D)(1) to exceed building height limits – to be 113 feet 10 inches and 10 stories, where 36 feet and 3 stories is the limit • Waiver of BMC Section 23.204.100(D)(1) to reduce the required front setback from 15 feet to 2 feet 6 inches
• Waiver of BMC Section 23.204.100(D)(1) to reduce the required rear setback from 15 feet to 11 feet 3 inches
• Waiver of BMC Section 23.204.100(D)(1) to reduce the required street side (left side) setback from 6 feet to 15 feet (varies by story) to 0 to 6 feet 9 inches • Waiver of BMC Section 23.204.100(D)(1) to reduce the required interior side (right side) setback from 4 feet to 12 feet (varies by story) to 5 feet 7 inches • Waiver of BMC Section 23.204.100(D)(1) to exceed the lot coverage limit – to be 62 percent, where 40 percent is the maximum.

I. CEQA FINDINGS

1. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City prepared an Addendum to the 3000 Shattuck Initial Study-Negative Declaration for this project.

A. Initial Study-Negative Declaration Addendum: An Addendum to the 3000 Shat tuck Initial
Study-Negative Declaration, which was adopted in November 2018, was prepared to evaluate the potentially significant environmental impacts of the proposed project, pursuant to CEQA. The Addendum considered the initial study and negative declaration, and

3000 SHATTUCK AVENUE- USE PERMIT #ZP2022-0046 FINDINGS & CONDITIONS May 11, 2023 Page 2 of 22

File: \\cobnas11\g$\Departmental-Data\Planning\LANDUSE\Projects by Address\Shattuck\3000\ZP2022-0046\DOCUMENT FINALS\ZAB\2023-05- 11_ZAB_ATT 1_Findings and Conditions_revised_3000 Shattuck.docx evaluated the modified project. Although the addendum includes an analysis of energy and wildfire, which were not included in the negative declaration, no significant impacts were found to occur regarding these resource areas. Substantive revisions to the negative declaration are not necessary because no new significant impacts will occur.

B. The Zoning Adjustment Board has considered the Addendum, and finds, on the basis of the whole record before it, that: (1) no potentially significant effects were identified that could not be reduced to less than significant levels by implementation of the City’s standard conditions of approval, (2) there is no substantial evidence the project will have a significant effect on the environment, and (3) the Addendum reflects the lead agency’s independent judgment and analysis. The record of proceedings upon which this decision is based is located at the Land Use Division of the Planning Department, 1947 Center Street, 2 nd Floor, Berkeley,
California 94704.

II. DENSITY BONUS FINDINGS

1. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65915, the Zoning Adjustments Board finds that:

A. Under the City’s methodology for implementing density bonuses, the “base project” consists of 111 units;
B. The project will provide at least 17 Very Low Income qualifying units in the 111-unit “base project”, as more fully set forth in Conditions of Approval 24 to 32; C. The project is entitled to a density increase of 50 percent over the otherwise maximum allowable residential density under the Zoning Ordinance and General Plan Land Use Element, under the requirements of Government Code Section 65915(b) and (f), plus three concessions or incentives, and an unlimited number of waivers. This equates to a density bonus of 56 units (55 taken) above the Base Project, for a total of 166-units.

2. In accordance with Government Code Section 65915(e) the Zoning Adjustments Board hereby grants the following waivers:

A. E xceed the Floor Area Ratio (FAR) limit from 4.0 to 6.0 B. E xceed the building height limit from 36 feet and 3 stories to 113 feet 10 inches and 10 stories
C. Reduce the required front setback from 15 feet to 2 feet 6 inches D. Reduce the required rear setback from 15 feet to 11 feet 3 inches E. Reduce the required street side (left side) setback from 6 feet to 15 feet (varies by story) to 0 feet
F. Reduce the required interior side (right side) setback from 4 feet to 12 feet (varies by story) to 5 feet 7 inches
G. E xceed the lot coverage limit from 40 percent to 62 percent

These waivers are required because state law requires the City to modify development standards as necessary to accommodate these density bonus units, and because the Zoning Adjustments Board hereby finds that the density bonus units can best be accommodated by granting these waivers.

3. In accordance with Government Code Section 65915(e), in order to allow construction of the proposed project with the density permitted under State law, the Zoning Adjustments Board finds approval of waivers is required 1) to construct the proposed project at the density permitted under State law; 2) approval of requested waivers would not have a specific

3000 SHATTUCK AVENUE- USE PERMIT #ZP2022-0046 FINDINGS & CONDITIONS May 11, 2023 Page 3 of 22

File: \\cobnas11\g$\Departmental-Data\Planning\LANDUSE\Projects by Address\Shattuck\3000\ZP2022-0046\DOCUMENT FINALS\ZAB\2023-05- 11_ZAB_ATT 1_Findings and Conditions_revised_3000 Shattuck.docx adverse impact upon public health and safety, or the physical environment, or on any real property listed in the California Register of Historical Resources; and 3) approval of the requested waivers would not be contrary to State or Federal law.

III. HOUSING ACCOUNTABILITY ACT FINDINGS
A. The Housing Accountability Act, Government Code Section 65589.5(j) requires that when a proposed housing development complies with applicable, objective general plan and zoning standards, a local agency may not deny the project or approve it with reduced density unless the agency makes written findings supported by substantial evidence that: (A) the development would have a specific adverse impact on public health or safety unless disapproved or approved at a lower density; and (B) there is no feasible method to satisfactorily mitigate or avoid the specific adverse impact, other than the disapproval or approval at a lower density.

B. Because the project complies with applicable, objective general plan and zoning standards, §65589.5(j) does apply to this project. No significant, quantifiable, direct and unavoidable impacts, based on objective, identified written public health or safety standards, polices, or conditions, have been identified. The project includes construction of a mixed-use building with 166 dwelling units.

IV. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL

4. As required by Section 23.406.040(E)(1) of the BMC, the project, under the circumstances of this particular case existing at the time at which the application is granted, would not be detrimental to the health, safety, peace, morals, comfort, and general welfare of the persons residing or working in the neighborhood of such proposed use or be detrimental or injurious to property and improvements of the adjacent properties, the surrounding area or neighborhood, or to the general welfare of the City because:

A. The project is subject to the City’s standard conditions of approval regarding construction noise and air quality, waste diversion, toxics, and stormwater requirements as well as any other project specific conditions. These standard conditions will ensure the project will not be detrimental to adjacent properties, the surrounding area or neighborhood or to the general welfare of the City.

B. Shadow studies submitted by the applicant document the addition’s projected shadow angles and lengths at three times throughout the day during the summer and winter solstice. New shadows would affect dwellings at the following locations:
o Newbury Street, northwest of the site, casting new shadows on the winter solstice two hours after sunrise.
o The northeast intersection of Ashby Avenue and Shattuck Avenue, casting new shadows on the winter solstice two hours before sunset. o Ashby Avenue, west of the project site, casting new shadows on the summer solstice two hours after sunrise.
o Shattuck Avenue, southeast of the project site, casting new shadows on the summer solstice two hours before sunset.
o Because the impacts to neighboring properties will occur on limited areas, and will only partially shade neighboring buildings for a limited time during the year, and only for a few hours of the day, the project will not result in a significant loss of direct sunlight on abutting dwellings, and these shading impacts are not deemed detrimental.

3000 SHATTUCK AVENUE- USE PERMIT #ZP2022-0046 FINDINGS & CONDITIONS May 11, 2023 Page 4 of 22

File: \\cobnas11\g$\Departmental-Data\Planning\LANDUSE\Projects by Address\Shattuck\3000\ZP2022-0046\DOCUMENT FINALS\ZAB\2023-05- 11_ZAB_ATT 1_Findings and Conditions_revised_3000 Shattuck.docx C. The project is consistent with all applicable C-SA District standards and qualifies for waivers and concessions for the listed district standards granted pursuant to State Density Bonuses, Government Code, Section 65915.

V. OTHER FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL

5. As required by Section 23.326.070 of the BMC, the Zoning Adjustments Board finds that the proposed demolition of the non-residential buildings is permissible because:

A. At a duly noticed hearing on May 5, 2016, the Landmarks Preservation Commission (LPC) reviewed a demolition referral for the existing structures and took no action to initiate a local historic designation.

B. The demolition of the gas station is not materially detrimental to the commercial and public interest of any affected neighborhood in the City. The new mixed-use building will replace the existing gas station with a new 81,522 square-foot building, with 166 dwelling units (studios), and 1,043 square-feet of commercial space.

C. Overall, demolition of the building will allow redevelopment of the project site which will complement and be compatible with surrounding uses.

D. Demolition is necessary to allow construction of the proposed building given the inclusion of a condition of approval that allows demolition of the existing buildings only after complete construction plans are submitted to the City for the replacement building (COA #21).

6. As required by Section 23.204.100(E) of the BMC, the Zoning Adjustments Board finds that the proposed use or structure:

A. Is compatible with the purposes of the district: The project is a higher-density development in proximity to regional transit, shops, and amenities, that is compatible with the purposes of the zoning district and the surrounding uses and buildings. The project site is located within the South Area Commercial District (C-SA) and is designated Avenue Commercial in the City’s General Plan. It will create 166 new studio dwelling units. Seventeen of the units will be deed restricted as affordable housing units for very- low-income residents.

The proposal also includes 1,043 square feet of commercial space and a total of 62 secure bicycle parking spaces (short-term and long-term) on the ground floor. The project site is well served by public transportation, including a BART station less than half-mile to the southwest. The surrounding commercial area includes retail sales, restaurants, personal services, and multi-family residential uses; the project will a dd to these
commercial and residential uses and add population to support these uses.

B. Is compatible in design and character with the district and the adjacent residential neighborhoods: The project site currently includes automotive uses. The proposed project will change uses on the site to ground-floor commercial, with residential uses on all floors.

The project will not introduce new land uses that do not already exist in the area. The design will be residential mixed-use, and will be consistent with the character of the commercial corridors of Shattuck Avenue and Ashby Avenue.

C. Will not result in the domination of one type of commercial/retail use in any one area of the district: The project includes 1,043 square feet of ground floor commercial space, and will

3000 SHATTUCK AVENUE- USE PERMIT #ZP2022-0046 FINDINGS & CONDITIONS May 11, 2023 Page 5 of 22

File: \\cobnas11\g$\Departmental-Data\Planning\LANDUSE\Projects by Address\Shattuck\3000\ZP2022-0046\DOCUMENT FINALS\ZAB\2023-05- 11_ZAB_ATT 1_Findings and Conditions_revised_3000 Shattuck.docx not result in the domination of one type of commercial use in this portion of the C-SA District.

7. As required by Section 23.204.100(D)(2) of the BMC, the Zoning Adjustments Board finds that the request to modify development standards in the C-SA District for mixed-use projects, including height and stories, setbacks, and lot coverage is permissible because the following findings can be made:

A. The proposed project is served by multiple bus lines (local and Transbay), is 0.3 miles from the Ashby BART Station, and the Bike Boulevard on Milvia Street is within 0.3 miles. Car parking is not required and will not be provided, but secure bike parking will be provided.

B. The reduction in the setbacks is greatest along the Shattuck and Ashby frontages, where it will have less of an impact on nearby dwelling units, and minimal street side and front setbacks are typical for commercial corridors.

C. The modification of height and stories, setbacks, and lot coverage supports the location of on-site affordable housing.

8. As required by Section 23.304.050(A) of the BMC, the Zoning Adjustments Board finds that the request to permit building features such as mechanical penthouses that project about the height limit is permissible because:

A. With a gross floor area of 81,522 square feet, the average floor area for ten floors is 8,152 square feet, and 15 percent of the average floor area is 1,223 square feet. The proposed features occupy 1,020 square feet, which complies with the 15 percent limit.

3000 SHATTUCK AVENUE- USE PERMIT #ZP2022-0046 FINDINGS & CONDITIONS May 11, 2023 Page 6 of 22

File: \\cobnas11\g$\Departmental-Data\Planning\LANDUSE\Projects by Address\Shattuck\3000\ZP2022-0046\DOCUMENT FINALS\ZAB\2023-05- 11_ZAB_ATT 1_Findings and Conditions_revised_3000 Shattuck.docx VI. STANDARD CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR ALL PROJECTS
The following conditions, as well as all other applicable provisions of the Zoning Ordinance, apply to this Permit:

1. Condit
ions Shall be Printed on Plans
The conditions of this Permit shall be printed on the secon d sheet of each plan set submitted
for a building permit pursuant to this Use Permit, under the title ‘Use Permit Conditions.’ Additional sheets may also be used if the second sheet is not of sufficient size to list all of the conditions. The sheet(s) containing the conditions shall be of the same size as those sheets containing the construction drawings; 8-1/2” by 11” sheets are not acceptable.

2. Compliance Required (BMC Section 23.102.050)
All land uses and structures in Berkeley must comply with the Zoning Ordinance and all applicable City ordinances and regulations. Compliance with the Zoning Ordinance does not relieve an applicant from requirements to comply with other federal, state, and City regulations that also apply to the property.

3. Approval Limited to Proposed Project and Replacement of Existing Uses (BMC Sections

23.404.060.B.1 and 2)
A. This Permit authorizes only the proposed project described in the application. In no way does an approval authorize other uses, structures or activities not included in the project description.

B. When the City approves a new use that replaces an existing use, any prior approval of the existing use becomes null and void when permits for the new use are exercised (e.g., building permit or business license issued). To reestablish the previously existing use, an applicant must obtain all permits required by the Zoning Ordinance for the use.

4. Conformance to Approved Plans (BMC Section 23.404.060.B.4) All work performed under an approved permit shall be in compliance with the approved plans and any conditions of approval.

5. Exercise and Expiration of Permits (BMC Section 23.404.060.C) A. A permit authorizing a land use is exercised when both a valid City business license is issued (if required) and the land use is established on the property.

B. A permit authorizing construction is exercised when both a valid City building permit (if required) is issued and construction has lawfully begun.

C. The Zoning Officer may declare a permit lapsed if it is not exercised within one year of its issuance, except if the applicant has applied for a building permit or has made a substantial good faith effort to obtain a building permit and begin construction. The Zoning Officer may declare a permit lapsed only after 14 days written notice to the applicant. A determination that a permit has lapsed may be appealed to the ZAB in accordance with Chapter 23.410 (Appeals and Certification).

D. A permit declared lapsed shall be void and of no further force and effect. To establish the use or structure authorized by the lapsed permit, an applicant must apply for and receive City approval of a new permit.

3000 SHATTUCK AVENUE- USE PERMIT #ZP2022-0046 FINDINGS & CONDITIONS May 11, 2023 Page 7 of 22

File: \\cobnas11\g$\Departmental-Data\Planning\LANDUSE\Projects by Address\Shattuck\3000\ZP2022-0046\DOCUMENT FINALS\ZAB\2023-05- 11_ZAB_ATT 1_Findings and Conditions_revised_3000 Shattuck.docx

6. Permit Remains Effective for Vacant Property (BMC Section 23.404.060.D) Once a Permit for a use is exercised and the use is established, the permit authorizing the use remains effective even if the property becomes vacant. The same use as allowed by the original permit may be re-established without obtaining a new permit, except as set forth in Standard Condition #5 above.

7. Permit Modifications (BMC Section 23.404.070)
No change in the use or structure for which this Permit is issued is permitted unless the Permit is modified by the Board. The Zoning Officer may approve changes to plans approved by the Board, consistent with the Board’s policy adopted on May 24, 1978, which reduce the size of the project.

8. Permit Revocation (BMC Section 23.404.080)
The City may revoke or modify a discretionary permit for completed projects due to: 1) violations of permit requirements; 2) Changes to the approved project; and/or 3) Vacancy for one year or more. However, no lawful residential use can lapse, regardless of the length of time of the vacancy. Proceedings to revoke or modify a permit may be initiated by the Zoning Officer, Zoning Adjustments Board (ZAB), or City Council referral.

9. Pay Transparency Acknowledgement (BMC Section 13.104.030) Prior to the issuance of a building permit for any Project subject to this Chapter:

A. A Responsible Representative of the Permittee shall certify under penalty of perjury that: (1) the Permittee has reviewed Chapter 13.104 of the Berkeley Municipal Code; and (2) the Permittee will be responsible for demonstrating compliance with this Chapter.

B. The Permittee shall provide to the City a Contractor Pay Transparency Acknowledgment on a form approved by the City for this purpose. A Responsible Representative of the Permittee shall certify under penalty of perjury that the Contractor and all Qualifying Subcontractors performing work on the Project will comply with Chapter 13.104 of the Berkeley Municipal Code and with Labor Code sections 226(a) and 2810.5 for each employee who works on the Project.

10. Pay Transparency Attestations Following Project Completion (BMC Section 13.104.040) Within 10 days of the approved final inspection of any Project subject to this Chapter, each Permittee shall provide to the City for each Contractor and Qualifying Subcontractor a Pay Transparency Attestation on a form approved by the City. On each Pay Transparency Attestation, a Responsible Representative of the Contractor or Qualifying Subcontractor shall attest under penalty of perjury that the Contractor or Qualifying Subcontractor complied with Chapter 13.104 of the Berkeley Municipal Code and Labor Code sections 226(a) and 2810.5 for each employee who performed work on the Project. The City will maintain Pay Transparency Attestation forms for period of at least three years after their date of receipt by the City.

11. Posting of Ordinance (BMC Section 13.104.050)
Each day work is performed on the Project, each Permittee shall post, and keep posted in a conspicuous location where it may be easily read by employees during the hours of the workday, a notice that: (A) contains the text of Chapter 13.104 of the Berkeley Municipal Code; (B) explains that workers can report violations of Labor Code sections 226 and 2810.5 to the

3000 SHATTUCK AVENUE- USE PERMIT #ZP2022-0046 FINDINGS & CONDITIONS May 11, 2023 Page 8 of 22

File: \\cobnas11\g$\Departmental-Data\Planning\LANDUSE\Projects by Address\Shattuck\3000\ZP2022-0046\DOCUMENT FINALS\ZAB\2023-05- 11_ZAB_ATT 1_Findings and Conditions_revised_3000 Shattuck.docx Labor Commissioner of the State of California; and (C) provides current contact information, including office address, telephone number, and email address of the Labor Commissioner of the State of California.

12. Conditions of Approval (BMC Section 13.104.060)
The requirements of Sections 13.104.030 through 13.104.050 shall be included as conditions of approval of any Use Permit or Zoning Certificate for any Project that is subject to this Chapter. Failure to comply with the requirements of any provision of this Chapter shall be grounds for issuance of an administrative citation under Chapter 1.28 and/or the revocation or modification of any Use Permit issued for the Project under Chapter 23B.60.

13. Indemnification Agreement
The applicant shall hold harmless, defend, and indemnify the City of Berkeley and its officers, agents, and employees against any and all liability, damages, claims, demands, judgments or other losses (including without limitation, attorney’s fees, expert witness and consultant fees and other litigation expenses), referendum or initiative relating to, resulting from or caused by, or alleged to have resulted from, or caused by, any action or approval associated with the project. The indemnity includes without limitation, any legal or administrative challenge, referendum or initiative filed or prosecuted to overturn, set aside, stay or otherwise rescind any or all approvals granted in connection with the Project, any environmental determination made for the project and granting any permit issued in accordance with the project. This indemnity includes, without limitation, payment of all direct and indirect costs associated with any action specified herein. Direct and indirect costs shall include, without limitation, any attorney’s fees, expert witness and consultant fees, court costs, and other litigation fees. City shall have the right to select counsel to represent the City at Applicant’s expense in the defense of any action specified in this condition of approval. City shall take reasonable steps to promptly notify the Applicant of any claim, demand, or legal actions that may create a claim for indemnification under these conditions of approval.

VII. ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS IMPOSED BY THE ZONING ADJUSTMENTS BOARD Pursuant to BMC 23.404.050(H), the Zoning Adjustments Board attaches the following additional conditions to this Permit:

See c
onditions of approval # 15, 16, 17, 27, a
nd 62 – below.

Prior to Submittal of Any Building Permit:

14. Project Liaison. The applicant shall include in all building permit plans and post onsite the name and telephone number of an individual empowered to manage construction-related complaints generated from the project. The individual’s name, telephone number, and responsibility for the project shall be posted at the project site for the duration of the project in a location easily visible to the public. The individual shall record all complaints received and actions taken in response, and submit written reports of such complaints and actions to the project planner on a weekly basis. Please designate the name of this individual below:

 Project Liaison ____________________________________________________ Name Phone #

3000 SHATTUCK AVENUE- USE PERMIT #ZP2022-0046 FINDINGS & CONDITIONS May 11, 2023 Page 9 of 22

File: \\cobnas11\g$\Departmental-Data\Planning\LANDUSE\Projects by Address\Shattuck\3000\ZP2022-0046\DOCUMENT FINALS\ZAB\2023-05- 11_ZAB_ATT 1_Findings and Conditions_revised_3000 Shattuck.docx

15. Meeting with Neighbors. The applicant shall meet with concerned neighbors and provide evidence that a meeting took place.

16. Consistency Between Floor Plans and Renderings. T he floor plans shall be updated to conform with the project renderings (e.g. windows in the rendering shall be in the floor plan). A narrative describing any changes to the floor plans shall accompany the plans submitted for a building permit.

17. Native Plants Required. E ighty percent of plantings at the project site shall be native to the Bay Area. Confirmation of compliance with this condition shall be indicated in the plans submitted for the building permit.

18. Final Design Review. T he Project requires approval of a Final Design Review application by the Design Review Committee.

19. Address Assignment. T
he applicant shall file an “Address Assignment Request Application” with the Permit Service Center (1947 Center Street) for any address change or new address associated with this Use Permit. The new address(es) shall be assigned and entered into the City’s database prior to the applicant’s submittal of a building permit application.

20. Construction Noi
se Reduction Program. The applicant shall develop a site-specific noise reduction program prepared by a qualified acoustical consultant to reduce construction noise impacts to the maximum extent feasible, subject to review and approval of the Zoning Officer.

The noise reduction program shall include the time limits for construction listed above, as measures needed to ensure that construction complies with BMC Section 13.40.070. The noise reduction program should include, but shall not be limited to, the following available controls to reduce construction noise levels as low as practical:

A. Construction equipment should be well maintained and used judiciously to be as quiet as practical.

B. Equip all internal combustion engine-driv
en equipment with mufflers, which are in good
condition and appropriate for the equipment.

C. Utilize “quiet” models of air compressors and other stationary noise sources where technology exists. Select hydraulically or electrically powered equipment and avoid pneumatically powered equipment where feasible.

D. Locate stationary noise-generating equipment as far as possible from sensitive receptors when adjoining construction sites. Construct temporary noise barriers or partial enclosures to acoustically shield such equipment where feasible.

E. Prohibit unnecessary idling of internal combustion engines.

F. If impact pile driving is required, pre-drill foundation pile holes to minimize the number of impacts required to seat the pile.

G. Construct solid plywood fences around construction sites adjacent to operational business, residences or other noise-sensitive land uses where the noise control plan analysis determines that a barrier would be effective at reducing noise.

H. Erect temporary noise control blanket barriers, if necessary, along building facades facing construction sites. This mitigation would only be necessary if conflicts occurred which were irresolvable by proper scheduling. Noise control blanket barriers can be rented and quickly erected.

3000 SHATTUCK AVENUE- USE PERMIT #ZP2022-0046 FINDINGS & CONDITIONS May 11, 2023 Page 10 of 22

File: \\cobnas11\g$\Departmental-Data\Planning\LANDUSE\Projects by Address\Shattuck\3000\ZP2022-0046\DOCUMENT FINALS\ZAB\2023-05- 11_ZAB_ATT 1_Findings and Conditions_revised_3000 Shattuck.docx I. Route construction related traffic along major roadways and away from sensitive receptors where feasible.

21. Damage Due to Construction Vibration. Th
e project applicant shall submit screening level
analysis prior to, or concurrent with demolition building permit. If a screening level analysis shows that the project has the potential to result in damage to structures, a structural engineer or other appropriate professional shall be retained to prepare a vibration impact assessment (assessment). The assessment shall take into account project specific information such as the composition of the structures, location of the various types of equipment used during each phase of the project, as well as the soil characteristics in the project area, in order to determine whether project construction may cause damage to any of the structures identified as potentially impacted in the screening level analysis. If the assessment finds that the project may cause damage to nearby structures, the structural engineer or other appropriate professional shall recommend design means and methods of construction that to avoid the potential damage, if feasible. The assessment and its recommendations shall be reviewed and approved by the Building and Safety Division and the Zoning Officer. If there are no feasible design means or methods to eliminate the potential for damage, the structural engineer or other appropriate professional shall undertake an existing conditions study (study) of any structures (or, in case of large buildings, of the portions of the structures) that may experience damage. This study shall:
• establish the baseline condition of these structures, including, but not limited to, the loc
ation and extent of any visible cracks or spalls; and
• include written descriptions and photographs.

The study shall be reviewed and approved by the Building and Safety Division and the Zoning Officer prior to issuance of a grading permit. Upon completion of the project, the structures (or, in case of large buildings, of the portions of the structures) previously inspected will be resurveyed, and any new cracks or other changes shall be compared to pre-construction conditions and a determination shall be made as to whether the proposed project caused the damage. The findings shall be submitted to the Building and Safety Division and the Zoning Officer for review. If it is determined that project construction has resulted in damage to the structure, the damage shall be repaired to the pre-existing condition by the project sponsor, provided that the property owner approves of the repair.

Prior to Issuance of Any Building & Safety Permit (Demolition or Construction)

22. Construction Noise Management - Public Notice Required. At least two weeks prior to initiating any construction activities at the site, the applicant shall provide notice to businesses and residents within 500 feet of the project site. This notice shall at a minimum provide the following: (1) project description, (2) description of construction activities during extended work hours and reason for extended hours, (3) daily construction schedule (i.e., time of day) and expected duration (number of months), (4) the name and phone number of the Project Liaison for the project that is responsible for responding to any local complaints, and (5) that construction work is about to commence. The liaison would determine the cause of all construction-related complaints (e.g., starting too early, bad muffler, worker parking, etc.) and institute reasonable measures to correct the problem. A copy of such notice and methodology for distributing the notice shall be provided in advance to the City for review and approval.

3000 SHATTUCK AVENUE- USE PERMIT #ZP2022-0046 FINDINGS & CONDITIONS May 11, 2023 Page 11 of 22

File: \\cobnas11\g$\Departmental-Data\Planning\LANDUSE\Projects by Address\Shattuck\3000\ZP2022-0046\DOCUMENT FINALS\ZAB\2023-05- 11_ZAB_ATT 1_Findings and Conditions_revised_3000 Shattuck.docx

23. Construction Phases. The applicant shall provide the Zoning Officer with a schedule of major construction phases with start dates and expected duration, a description of the activities and anticipated noise levels of each phase, and the name(s) and phone number(s) of the individual(s) directly supervising each phase. The Zoning Officer or his/her designee shall have the authority to require an on-site meeting with these individuals as necessary to ensure compliance with these conditions. The applicant shall notify the Zoning Officer of any changes to this schedule as soon as possible.

24. Demolition.

Demolition of the existing building cannot commence until a complete application is submitted for the replacement building. In addition, all plans presented to the City to obtain a permit to allow the demolition are subject to these conditions.

25. Construction and Demolition Diversion. Applicant shall submit a Construction Waste Management Plan that meets the requirements of BMC Chapter 19.37 including 100% diversion of asphalt, concrete, excavated soil and land-clearing debris and a minimum of 65% diversion of other nonhazardous construction and demolition waste.

26. Toxics.

The applicant shall contact the Toxics Management Division (TMD) at 1947 Center Street or (510) 981-7470 to determine which of the following documents are required and timing for their submittal:

A. Environmental Site Assessments:
1) Phase I & Phase II Environmental Site Assessments (lat est ASTM 1527-13). A recent
Phase I ESA (less than 2 years old*) shall be submitted to TMD for developments for:
• All new commercial, industrial and mixed use developments and all large improvement projects.
• All new residential buildings with 5 or more dwelling units located in the Environmental Management Area (or EMA).
• EMA is available online
at:
http://www.cityofberkeley.info/uploadedFiles/IT/Level_3_-_General/ema.pdf 2) Phase II ESA is required to evaluate Recognized Environmental Conditions (REC) identified in the Phase I or other RECs identified by TMD staff. The TMD may require a third party toxicologist to review human or ecological health risks that may be identified.

The applicant may apply to the appropriate state, regional or county cleanup agency to evaluate the risks.
3) If the Phase I is over 2 years old, it will require a new site reconnaissance and interviews. If the facility was subject to regulation under Title 15 of the Berkeley Municipal Code since the last Phase I was conducted, a new records review must be performed.

B. Soil and Groundwater Management Plan:
1) A Soil and Groundwater Management Plan (SGMP) shall be submitted to TMD for all non-residential projects, and residential or mixed-use projects with five or more dwelling units, that: (1) are in the Environmental Management Area (EMA) and (2) propose any excavations deeper than 5 feet below grade. The SGMP shall be site specific and identify procedures for soil and groundwater management including identification of pollutants and disposal methods. The SGMP will identify permits required and comply with all applicable local, state and regional requirements. 2) The SGMP shall require notification to TMD of any hazardous materials found in soils and groundwater during development. The SGMP will provide guidance on managing

3000 SHATTUCK AVENUE- USE PERMIT #ZP2022-0046 FINDINGS & CONDITIONS May 11, 2023 Page 12 of 22

File: \\cobnas11\g$\Departmental-Data\Planning\LANDUSE\Projects by Address\Shattuck\3000\ZP2022-0046\DOCUMENT FINALS\ZAB\2023-05- 11_ZAB_ATT 1_Findings and Conditions_revised_3000 Shattuck.docx odors during excavation. The SGMP will provide the name and phone number of the individual responsible for implementing the SGMP and post the name and phone number for the person responding to community questions and complaints. 3) TMD may impose additional conditions as deemed necessary. All requirements of the approved SGMP shall be deemed conditions of approval of this Use Permit.

C. Building Materials Survey:
1) Prior to approving any permit for partial or complete demolition and renovation activities involving the removal of 20 square or lineal feet of interior or exterior walls, a building materials survey shall be conducted by a qualified professional. The survey shall include, but not be limited to, identification of any lead-based paint, asbestos, polychlorinated biphenyl (PBC) containing equipment, hydraulic fluids in elevators or lifts, refrigeration systems, treated wood and mercury containing devices (including fluorescent light bulbs and mercury switches). The Survey shall include plans on hazardous waste or hazardous materials removal, reuse or disposal procedures to be implemented that fully comply state hazardous waste generator requirements (22 California Code of Regulations 66260 et seq). The Survey becomes a condition of any building or demolition permit for the project. Documentation evidencing disposal of hazardous waste in compliance with the survey shall be submitted to TMD within 30 days of the completion of the demolition. If asbestos is identified, Bay Area Air Quality Management District Regulation 11-2-401.3 a notification must be made and the J number must be made available to the City of Berkeley Permit Service Center.

D. Hazardous Materials Business Plan:
1) A Hazardous Materials Business Plan (HMBP) in compliance with BMC Section

15.12.040 shall be submitted electronically at http://cers.calepa.ca.gov/ within 30 days if on-site hazardous materials exceed BMC 15.20.040. HMBP requirement can be found at http://ci.berkeley.ca.us/hmr/

Affordable Housing Requirements

27. Project shall comply with BMC Chapter 23.328 Inclusionary Housing, effective April 1, 2023 and Resolution 70,698-N.S. Adopting Regulations for Voucher Program and Establishing an In-Lieu Fee to Support the Provision of Affordable Housing Pursuant to Berkeley Municipal Code 23.328 and Rescinding Resolution 70,668-N.S.

Prior to Issuance of Any Building (Construction) Permi
t

28. Parcel Merger. The applicant shall secure approval of any parcel merger and/or lot line adjustment associated with this Use Permit.

29. Percent for Pu blic Art: Consistent with BMC §23.316, the applicant shall either pay the required in-lieu fee or provide the equivalent amount in a financial guarantee to be released after installation of the On-Site Publicly Accessible Art.

30. HVAC Noise Reduction. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the project applicant shall submit plans that show the location, type, and design of proposed heating, ventilation, and cooling (HVAC) equipment. In addition, the applicant shall provide product specification sheets or a report from a qualified acoustical consultant showing that operation of the proposed HVAC equipment will meet the City’s exterior noise requirements in BMC Section 13.40.050. The City’s Planning and Development Department shall review the submitted plans, including the selected HVAC equipment, to verify compliance with exterior noise standards.

3000 SHATTUCK AVENUE- USE PERMIT #ZP2022-0046 FINDINGS & CONDITIONS May 11, 2023 Page 13 of 22

File: \\cobnas11\g$\Departmental-Data\Planning\LANDUSE\Projects by Address\Shattuck\3000\ZP2022-0046\DOCUMENT FINALS\ZAB\2023-05- 11_ZAB_ATT 1_Findings and Conditions_revised_3000 Shattuck.docx

31. Interior Noise Levels. Pr ior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit a report to the Building and Safety Division and the Zoning Officer by a qualified acoustic engineer certifying that the interior residential portions of the project will achieve interior noise levels of no more than 45 Ldn (Average Day-Night Levels). If the adopted Building Code imposes a more restrictive standard for interior noise levels, the report shall certify compliance with this standard.

32. Solar Photovoltaic (Solar PV). Sol
ar Photovoltaic (Solar PV) and Battery Energy Storage
Systems (ESS). A solar PV system shall be installed, subject to specific limited exceptions, as specified by the Berkeley Energy Code (BMC Chapter 19.36). Energy storage system (ESS) readiness (new single-family, duplex, and townhouse homes) or ESS installation (new multifamily and most nonresidential buildings) shall be completed as specified by BMC Chapter 19.36. Location of the solar PV system and the ESS, if applicable, shall be noted on the construction plans.

33. Water Efficient Landscaping. La
ndscaping, totaling 500 square feet of more of new
landscaping or 2,500 square feet or more of renovated irrigated area, shall comply with the State’s Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (MWELO). MWELO-compliant landscape documentation including a planting, grading, and irrigation plan shall be included in site plans.

Water budget calculations are also required for landscapes of 2,500 square feet or more and shall be included in site plans. The reference evapotranspiration rate (ETo) for Berkeley is

41.8. 34. Prohibition of Natural Gas Infrastructure in New Buildings. Th e project shall comply with the
City of Berkeley Prohibition of Natural Gas Infrastructure in New Buildings (BMC Chapter

12.80).

35. Recycling and Organics Collection. Applicant shall provide recycling and organics collection areas for occupants, clearly marked on site plans, which comply with the Alameda County Mandatory Recycling Ordinance (ACWMA Ordinance 2012-01).

36. Public Wo
rks ADA. Plans submitted for building permit shall include replacement of sidewalk, curb, gutter, and other streetscape improvements, as necessary to comply with current City of Berkeley standards for accessibility.

37. Required Parking Spac
es for Persons with Disabilities. Per BMC Section 23.322.040.H of the Zoning Ordinance, “If the number of required off-street parking spaces in a non-residential district is reduced as allowed by this chapter, the number of required parking spaces for persons with disabilities shall be calculated as if there had been no reduction in required spaces.”

Prior to Demolition or Start of Construction:

38. Construction Meeting. The applicant shall request of the Zoning Officer an on-site meeting with City staff and key parties involved in the early phases of construction (e.g., applicant, general contractor, foundation subcontractors) to review these conditions and the construction schedule. The general contractor or applicant shall ensure that all subcontractors involved in subsequent phases of construction aware of the conditions of approval.

3000 SHATTUCK AVENUE- USE PERMIT #ZP2022-0046 FINDINGS & CONDITIONS May 11, 2023 Page 14 of 22

File: \\cobnas11\g$\Departmental-Data\Planning\LANDUSE\Projects by Address\Shattuck\3000\ZP2022-0046\DOCUMENT FINALS\ZAB\2023-05- 11_ZAB_ATT 1_Findings and Conditions_revised_3000 Shattuck.docx

During Construction:

39. Construction Hours. Construction activity shall be limited to between the hours of 7:00 AM and 6:00 PM on Monday through Friday, and between 9:00 AM and 4:00 PM on Saturday. No construction-related activity shall occur on Sunday or any Federal Holiday.

40. Construction Hours- E
xceptions. It is recognized that certain construction activities, such as the placement of concrete, must be performed in a continuous manner and may require an extension of these work hours. Prior to initiating any activity that might require a longer period, the developer must notify the Zoning Officer and request an exception for a finite period of time. If the Zoning Officer approves the request, then two weeks prior to the expanded schedule, the developer shall notify businesses and residents within 500 feet of the project site describing the expanded construction hours. A copy of such notice and methodology for distributing the notice shall be provided in advance to the City for review and approval. The project shall not be allowed more than 15 extended working days.

41. Project Construction Website. The
applicant shall establish a project construction website with the following information clearly accessible and updated monthly or more frequently as changes warrant:
• Contact information (i.e. “hotline” phone number, and email address) for the project cons
truction manager
• Calendar and schedule of daily/weekly/monthly construction activities • The final Conditions of Approval, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, Transportation Construction Plan, Construction Noise Reduction Program, and any other reports or programs related to construction noise, air quality, and traffic.

42. Public Works -
Implement BAAQMD-Recommended Measures during Construction. For all proposed projects, BAAQMD recommends implementing all the Basic Construction Mitigation Measures, listed below to meet the best management practices threshold for fugitive dust:

A. All exposed surfaces (e.g., parking areas, staging areas, soil piles, graded areas, and unpaved access roads) shall be watered two times per day.

B. All haul trucks transporting soil, sand, or other loose material off-site shall be covered.

C. All visible mud or dirt track-out onto adjacent public roads shall be removed using wet power vacuum street sweepers at least once per day. The use of dry power sweeping is prohibited.

D. All vehicle speeds on unpaved roads shall be limited to 15 mph.

E. All roadways, driveways, and sidewalks to be paved shall be completed as soon as possible. Building pads shall be laid as soon as possible after grading unless seeding or soil binders are used.

F. Idling times shall be minimized either by shutting equipment off when not in use or reducing the maximum idling time to 5 minutes (as required by the California airborne toxics control measure Title 13, Section 2485 of California Code of Regulations [CCR]).

Clear signage shall be provided for construction workers at all access points.

G. All
construction equipment shall be maintained and properly tuned in accordance with manufacturer‘s specifications. All equipment shall be checked by a certified visible emissions evaluator.

H. Post a publicly visible sign with the telephone number and person to contact at the lead agency regarding dust complaints. This person shall respond and take corrective action

3000 SHATTUCK AVENUE- USE PERMIT #ZP2022-0046 FINDINGS & CONDITIONS May 11, 2023 Page 15 of 22

File: \\cobnas11\g$\Departmental-Data\Planning\LANDUSE\Projects by Address\Shattuck\3000\ZP2022-0046\DOCUMENT FINALS\ZAB\2023-05- 11_ZAB_ATT 1_Findings and Conditions_revised_3000 Shattuck.docx within 48 hours. The Air District‘s phone number shall also be visible to ensure compliance with applicable regulations.

43. Air Quality - D iesel Particulate Matter Controls during Construction. All off-road construction equipment used for projects with construction lasting more than 2 months shall comply with one of the following measures:

A. The project applicant shall prepare a health risk assessment that demonstra tes the
project’s on-site emissions of diesel particulate matter during construction will not exceed health risk screening criteria after a screening-level health risk assessment is conducted in accordance with current guidance from BAAQMD and OEHHA. The health risk assessment shall be submitted to the Land Use Planning Division for review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits; or
B. All construction equipment shall be equipped with Tier 2 or higher engines and the most effective Verified Diesel Emission Control Strategies (VDECS) available for the engine type (Tier 4 engines automatically meet this requirement) as certified by the California Air Resources Board (CARB). The equipment shall be properly maintained and tuned in accordance with manufacturer specifications.

In addition, a Construction Emissions Minimization Plan (Emissions Plan) shall be prepared that includes the following:
• An equipment inventory summarizing the type of off-road equipment required for each phase of construction, including the equipment manufacturer, equipment identification number, engine model year, engine certification (tier rating), horsepower, and engine serial number. For all VDECS, the equipment inventory shall also include the technology type, serial number, make, model, manufacturer, CARB verification number level, and installation date.
• A Certification Statement that the Contractor agrees to comply fully with the Emissions Plan and acknowledges that a significant violation of the Emissions Plan shall constitute a material breach of contract. The Emissions Plan shall be submitted to the Public Works Department for review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits.

44. Construction and Demolition Diversion. Divert debris according to your plan and c ollect
required documentation. Get construction debris receipts from sorting facilities in order to verify diversion requirements. Upload recycling and disposal receipts if using Green Halo and submit online for City review and approval prior to final inspection. Alternatively, complete the second page of the original Construction Waste Management Plan and present it, along with your construction debris receipts, to the Building Inspector by the final inspection to demonstrate diversion rate compliance. The Zoning Officer may request summary reports at more frequent intervals, as necessary to ensure compliance with this requirement.

45. Low-Carbon
Concrete. The project shall maintain compliance with the Berkeley Green Code (BMC Chapter 19.37) including use of concrete mix design with a cement reduction of at least 25%. Documentation on concrete mix design shall be available at all times at the construction site for review by City Staff.

46. Transportation Cons
truction Plan. The applicant and all persons associated with the project are hereby notified that a Transportation Construction Plan (TCP) is required for all phases of construction, particularly for the following activities:

3000 SHATTUCK AVENUE- USE PERMIT #ZP2022-0046 FINDINGS & CONDITIONS May 11, 2023 Page 16 of 22

File: \\cobnas11\g$\Departmental-Data\Planning\LANDUSE\Projects by Address\Shattuck\3000\ZP2022-0046\DOCUMENT FINALS\ZAB\2023-05- 11_ZAB_ATT 1_Findings and Conditions_revised_3000 Shattuck.docx • Alterations, closures, or blockages to sidewalks, pedestrian paths or vehicle travel lanes (including bicycle lanes);
• Storage of building materials, dumpsters, debris anywhere in the public ROW; • Provision of exclusive contractor parking on-street; or • Significant truck activity.

The applicant shall secure the City Traffic Engineer’s approval of a TCP. Please contact the Office of Transportation at 981-7010, or 1947 Center Street, and ask to speak to a traffic engineer. In addition to other requirements of the Traffic Engineer, this plan shall include the locations of material and equipment storage, trailers, worker parking, a schedule of site operations that may block traffic, and provisions for traffic control. The TCP shall be consistent with any other requirements of the construction phase.

Contact the Permit Service Center (PSC) at 1947 Center Street or 981-7500 for details on obtaining Construction/No Parking Permits (and associated signs and accompanying dashboard permits). Please note that the Zoning Officer and/or Traffic Engineer may limit off- site parking of construction-relat
ed vehicles if necessary to protect the health, safety or convenience of the surrounding neighborhood. A current copy of this Plan shall be available at all times at the construction site for review by City Staff.

47. Avoid Disturbance of Nesting Birds. I
nitial site disturbance activities, including vegetation and concrete removal, shall be prohibited during the general avian nesting season (February 1 to August 30), if feasible. If nesting season avoidance is not feasible, the applicant shall retain a qualified biologist to conduct a preconstruction nesting bird survey to determine the presence/absence, location, and activity status of any active nests on or adjacent to the project site. The extent of the survey buffer area surrounding the site shall be established by the qualified biologist to ensure that direct and indirect effects to nesting birds are avoided. To avoid the destruction of active nests and to protect the reproductive success of birds protected by the MBTA and CFGC, nesting bird surveys shall be performed not more than 14 days prior to scheduled vegetation and concrete removal. In the event that active nests are discovered, a suitable buffer (typically a minimum buffer of 50 feet for passerines and a minimum buffer of 250 feet for raptors) shall be established around such active nests and no construction shall be allowed inside the buffer areas until a qualified biologist has determined that the nest is no longer active (e.g., the nestlings have fledged and are no longer reliant on the nest). No ground-disturbing activities shall occur within this buffer until the qualified biologist has confirmed that breeding/nesting is completed and the young have fledged the nest. Nesting bird surveys are not required for construction activities occurring between August 31 and January 31.

48. Archaeological Resources (Ong
oing throughout demolition, grading, and/or construction).

Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15064.5(f), “provisions for historical or unique archaeological resources accidentally discovered during construction” should be instituted.

Therefore:

A. In the event that any prehistoric or historic subsurface cultural resources are di scovered
during ground disturbing activities, all work within 50 feet of the resources shall be halted and the project applicant and/or lead agency shall consult with a qualified archaeologist, historian or paleontologist to assess the significance of the find.

3000 SHATTUCK AVENUE- USE PERMIT #ZP2022-0046 FINDINGS & CONDITIONS May 11, 2023 Page 17 of 22

File: \\cobnas11\g$\Departmental-Data\Planning\LANDUSE\Projects by Address\Shattuck\3000\ZP2022-0046\DOCUMENT FINALS\ZAB\2023-05- 11_ZAB_ATT 1_Findings and Conditions_revised_3000 Shattuck.docx B. If any find is determined to be significant, representatives of the project proponent and/or lead agency and the qualified professional would meet to determine the appropriate avoidance measures or other appropriate measure, with the ultimate determination to be made by the City of Berkeley. All significant cultural materials recovered shall be subject to scientific analysis, professional museum curation, and/or a report prepared by the qualified professional according to current professional standards.

C. In considering any suggested measure proposed by the qualified professional, the project applicant shall determine whether avoidance is necessary or feasible in light of factors such as the uniqueness of the find, project design, costs, and other considerations.

D. If avoidance is unnecessary or infeasible, other appropriate measures (e.g., data recovery) shall be instituted. Work may proceed on other parts of the project site while mitigation measures for cultural resources is carried out.

E. If significant materials are recovered, the qualified professional shall prepare a report on the findings for submittal to the Northwest Information Center.

49. Human Remains (Ong
oing throughout demolition, grading, and/or construction). In the event that human skeletal remains are uncovered at the project site during ground-disturbing activities, all work shall immediately halt and the Alameda County Coroner shall be contacted to evaluate the remains, and following the procedures and protocols pursuant to Section 15064.5 (e)(1) of the CEQA Guidelines. If the County Coroner determines that the remains are Native American, the City shall contact the California Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC), pursuant to subdivision (c) of Section 7050.5 of the Health and Safety Code, and all excavation and site preparation activities shall cease within a 50-foot radius of the find until appropriate arrangements are made. If the agencies determine that avoidance is not feasible, then an alternative plan shall be prepared with specific steps and timeframe required to resume construction activities. Monitoring, data recovery, determination of significance and avoidance measures (if applicable) shall be completed expeditiously.

50. Paleontological Resources (Ongoi
ng throughout demolition, grading, and/or construction). In the event of an unanticipated discovery of a paleontological resource during construction, excavations within 50 feet of the find shall be temporarily halted or diverted until the discovery is examined by a qualified paleontologist (per Society of Vertebrate Paleontology standards [SVP 1995,1996]). The qualified paleontologist shall document the discovery as needed, evaluate the potential resource, and assess the significance of the find. The paleontologist shall notify the appropriate agencies to determine procedures that would be followed before construction is allowed to resume at the location of the find. If the City determines that avoidance is not feasible, the paleontologist shall prepare an excavation plan for mitigating the effect of the project on the qualities that make the resource important, and such plan shall be implemented. The plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval.

51. Halt Work/Unanticipated Discovery of Tribal Cultural Resources. I n the event that cultural
resources of Native American origin are identified during construction, all work within 50 feet of the discovery shall be redirected. The project applicant and project construction contractor shall notify the City Planning Department within 24 hours. The City will again contact any tribes who have requested consultation under AB 52, as well as contact a qualified archaeologist, to evaluate the resources and situation and provide recommendations. If it is determined that the resource is a tribal cultural resource and thus significant under CEQA, a mitigation plan shall be prepared and implemented in accordance with State guidelines and in

3000 SHATTUCK AVENUE- USE PERMIT #ZP2022-0046 FINDINGS & CONDITIONS May 11, 2023 Page 18 of 22

File: \\cobnas11\g$\Departmental-Data\Planning\LANDUSE\Projects by Address\Shattuck\3000\ZP2022-0046\DOCUMENT FINALS\ZAB\2023-05- 11_ZAB_ATT 1_Findings and Conditions_revised_3000 Shattuck.docx consultation with Native American groups. If the resource cannot be avoided, additional measures to avoid or reduce impacts to the resource and to address tribal concerns may be required.

52. Stormwater Requirements. The
applicant shall demonstrate compliance with the requirements of the City’s National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit as described in BMC Section 17.20. The following conditions apply:

A. The project plans shall identify and show site-spec ific Best Management Practices (BMPs) appropriate to activities conducted on-site to limit to the maximum extent practicable the discharge of pollutants to the City's storm drainage system, regardless of season or weather conditions.

B. Trash enclosures and/or recycling area(s) shall be covered; no other area shall drain onto thi
s area. Drains in any wash or process area shall not discharge to the storm drain system; these drains should connect to the sanitary sewer. Applicant shall contact the City of Berkeley and EBMUD for specific connection and discharge requirements.

Discharges to the sanitary sewer are subject to the review, approval and conditions of the City of Berkeley and EBMUD.

C. Landscaping shall be designed with efficient irrigation to reduce runoff, promote surface infiltration and minimize the use of fertilizers and pesticides that contribute to stormwater pollution. Where f
easible, landscaping should be designed and operated to treat runoff.

When and where possible, xeriscape and drought tolerant plants shall be incorporated into new development plans.

D. Design, location and maintenance requirements and schedules for any stormwater quality treatment structural controls shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review with respect to reasonable adequacy of the controls. The review does not relieve the property owner of the responsibility for complying with BMC Chapter 17.20 and future revisions to the City's overall stormwater quality ordinances. This review shall be shall be conducted prior to the issuance of a Building Permit.

E. All paved outdoor storage areas must be designed to reduce/limit the potential for runoff to contact pollutants.

F. All on-site storm drain inlets/catch basins must be cleaned at least once a year immediately prior to the rainy season. The property owner shall be responsible for all costs associated with proper operation and maintenance of all storm drainage facilities (pipelines, inlets, catch basins, outlets, etc.) associated with the project, unless the City accepts such facilities by Council action. Additional cleaning may be required by City of Berkeley Public Works Engineering Dept.

G. All private or public projects that create and/or replace 10,000 square feet or more of impervious surface must comply with Provision C.3 of the Alameda County NPDES permit and must incorporate stormwater controls to enhance water quality. Permit submittals shall include a Stormwater Requirement Checklist and detailed information showing how the proposed project will meet Provision C.3 stormwater requirements, including a) Site design measures to reduce impervious surfaces, promote infiltration, and reduce water quality impacts; b) Source Control Measures to keep pollutants out of stormwater runoff; c) Stormwater treatment measures that are hydraulically sized to remove pollutants from stormwater; d) an O & M (Operations and Maintenance) agreement for all stormwater treatment devices and installations; and e) Engineering calculations for all stormwater devices (both mechanical and biological).

3000 SHATTUCK AVENUE- USE PERMIT #ZP2022-0046 FINDINGS & CONDITIONS May 11, 2023 Page 19 of 22

File: \\cobnas11\g$\Departmental-Data\Planning\LANDUSE\Projects by Address\Shattuck\3000\ZP2022-0046\DOCUMENT FINALS\ZAB\2023-05- 11_ZAB_ATT 1_Findings and Conditions_revised_3000 Shattuck.docx H. All on-site storm drain inlets must be labeled “No Dumping – Drains to Bay” or equivalent using methods approved by the City.

I. Most washing and/or steam cleaning must be done at an appropriately equipped facility that drains to the sanitary sewer. Any outdoor washing or pressure washing must be managed in such a way that there is no discharge or soaps or other pollutants to the storm drain. Sanitary connections are subject to the review, approval and conditions of the sanitary district with jurisdiction for receiving the discharge.

J. All loading areas must be designated to minimize “run-on” or runoff from the area.

Accumulated waste water that may contribute to the pollution of stormwater must be drained to the sanitary sewer or intercepted and pretreated prior to discharge to the storm drain system. The property owner shall ensure that BMPs are implemented to prevent potential stormwater pollution. These BMPs shall include, but are not limited to, a regular program of sweeping, litter control and spill cleanup.

K. Restaurants, where deemed appropriate, must be designed with a contained area for cleaning mats, equipment and containers. This contained wash area shall be covered or designed to prevent run-on or run-off from the area. The area shall not discharge to the storm drains; wash waters should drain to the sanitary sewer, or collected for ultimate disposal to the sanitary sewer. Employees shall be instructed and signs posted indicating that all washing activities shall be conducted in this area. Sanitary connections are subject to the review, approval and conditions of the waste water treatment plant receiving the discharge.

L. Sidewalks and parking lots shall be swept regularly to prevent the accumulation of litter and debris. If pressure washed, debris must be trapped and collected to prevent entry to the storm drain system. If any cleaning agent or degreaser is used, wash water shall not discharge to the storm drains; wash waters should be collected and discharged to the sanitary sewer. Discharges to the sanitary sewer are subject to the review, approval and conditions of the sanitary district with jurisdiction for receiving the discharge.

M. The applicant is responsible for ensuring that all contractors and sub-contractors are aware of and implement all stormwater quality control measures. Failure to comply with the approved construction BMPs shall result in the issuance of correction notices, citations, or a project stop work order.

53. Public Works.

All piles of debris, soil, sand, or other loose materials shall be covered at night and during rainy weather with plastic at least one-eighth millimeter thick and secured to the ground.

54. Public Works.

The applicant shall ensure that all excavation takes into account surface and subsurface waters and underground streams so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties and rights-of-way.

55. Public Works.

The project sponsor shall maintain sandbags or other devices around the site perimeter during the rainy season to prevent on-site soils from being washed off-site and into the storm drain system. The project sponsor shall comply with all City ordinances regarding construction and grading.

56. Public Works.

Prior to any excavation, grading, clearing, or other activities involving soil disturbance during the rainy season the applicant shall obtain approval of an erosion prevention plan by the Building and Safety Division and the Public Works Department. The

3000 SHATTUCK AVENUE- USE PERMIT #ZP2022-0046 FINDINGS & CONDITIONS May 11, 2023 Page 20 of 22

File: \\cobnas11\g$\Departmental-Data\Planning\LANDUSE\Projects by Address\Shattuck\3000\ZP2022-0046\DOCUMENT FINALS\ZAB\2023-05- 11_ZAB_ATT 1_Findings and Conditions_revised_3000 Shattuck.docx applicant shall be responsible for following these and any other measures required by the Building and Safety Division and the Public Works Department.

57. Public Works. T he removal or obstruction of any fire hydrant shall require the submission of a plan to the City’s Public Works Department for the relocation of the fire hydrant during construction.

58. Public Works. If
underground utilities leading to adjacent properties are uncovered and/or broken, the contractor involved shall immediately notify the Public Works Department and the Building & Safety Division, and carry out any necessary corrective action to their satisfaction.

Prior to Final Inspection or Issuance of Occupancy Permi t:

59. Compliance with Conditions. The project shall conform to the plans and statements in the Use Permit. The developer is responsible for providing sufficient evidence to demonstrate compliance with the requirements throughout the implementation of this Use Permit.

60. Compliance with Approved Plan. The project shall conform to the plans and statements in the Use Permit. All landscape, site and architectural improvements shall be completed per the attached approved drawings received May 2, 2023, except as modified by conditions of approval.

61. Transportation Demand Management. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the property owner shall facilitate a site inspection by Land Use Division staff to confirm that the physical improvements required in Section 23.334.030(C) and 23.322.090 (bike parking) have been installed. A Parking and Transportation Demand Management (PTDM) compliance report documenting that the programmatic measures required in Sections 23.334.030(C) and

23.322.090 are implemented shall be submitted to the Land Use Division prior to occupancy, and on an annual basis thereafter, which demonstrates that the project is compliant with the applicable requirements in these sections.

A. Consistent with Sect
ion 23.334.030(B), at least one of the following transit benefits shall be offered, at no cost to the resident, for a period of ten years after the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. A notice describing these transportation benefits shall be posted in a location or locations visible to all employees.

1. One monthly pass for unlimited local bus transit service for every bedroom in each dwelling unit.

2. Subject to the review and approval of the Zoning Officer in consultation with the Transportation Division Manager, a functionally equivalent transit benefit in an amount at least equal to the price of a non-discounted unlimited adult monthly pass for unlimited local bus transit service monthly local bus pass.

B. Consistent with Section 23.334.030(C), publicly-available, real-time transportation information in a common area, such as a lobby or elevator bay, on televisions, computer monitors or other displays readily visible to residents and/or visitors, shall be provided.

Transportation information shall include, but is not limited to, transit arrivals and departures for nearby transit routes.

At All Times:

62. Native Plants Required. Eighty percent of plantings at the project site shall be native to the Bay Area.

3000 SHATTUCK AVENUE- USE PERMIT #ZP2022-0046 FINDINGS & CONDITIONS May 11, 2023 Page 21 of 22

File: \\cobnas11\g$\Departmental-Data\Planning\LANDUSE\Projects by Address\Shattuck\3000\ZP2022-0046\DOCUMENT FINALS\ZAB\2023-05- 11_ZAB_ATT 1_Findings and Conditions_revised_3000 Shattuck.docx

63. Transportation Demand Management Compliance. The pr operty owner shall submit to the Planning Department periodic TDM Compliance Reports in accordance with Administrative Regulations, subject to the review and oversight of the Zoning Officer. Property owners may be required to pay administrative fees associated with compliance with this Condition, pursuant to BMC Section 23.334.040(B).

64. Exterior Lighting. A
ll exterior lighting shall be energy efficient where feasible; and shielded and directed downward and away from property lines to prevent excessive glare beyond the subject property.

65. Noise and exterior lighting shall be controlled so as to prevent verified complaints from the surrounding neighborhood. This shall include noise created by employees working on the premises before or after patrons arrive.

66. Rooftop Projections. N
o additional rooftop or elevator equipment shall be added to exceed the approved maximum roof height without submission of an application for a Use Permit Modification, subject to Board review and approval.

67. Design Review. Si
gnage and any other exterior modifications, including but not limited to landscaping and lighting, shall be subject to Design Review Committee approval.

68. Drainage Patterns. The applicant shall establish and maintain drainage patterns that do not adversely affect adjacent properties and rights-of-way. Drainage plans shall be submitted for approval of the Building & Safety Division and Public Works Department, if required.

69. Electrical Meter. Onl
y one electrical meter fixture may be installed per dwelling unit.

70. Loading. A
ll loading/unloading activities associated with deliveries to all uses shall be restricted to the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. daily.

71. Residential Permit Parking. No Residential Permit Parking (RPP) permits shall be issued to project residents, nor shall commercial placards be issued to non-residential occupants and/or users of the site. The project planner shall notify the Finance Department, Customer Service Center, to add these addresses to the list of addresses ineligible for RPP permits. The property owner shall notify all tenants of rental units, and/or buyers of condominium units, of this restriction in leases and/or contracts, and shall provide sample leases and/or contracts including such notification to the project planner prior to issuance of an occupancy permit or final inspection.

72. Bike Par
king. Secure and on-site bike parking for at least 61 bicycles shall be provided for the life of the building.

73. Tenant Notification. The developer shall provide tenant notification, via a lease rider or deed covenant, that each dwelling unit is located in a mixed-use area that includes commercial, food service and entertainment uses, and that each occupant shall not seek to impede their lawful operation.

3000 SHATTUCK AVENUE- USE PERMIT #ZP2022-0046 FINDINGS & CONDITIONS May 11, 2023 Page 22 of 22

File: \\cobnas11\g$\Departmental-Data\Planning\LANDUSE\Projects by Address\Shattuck\3000\ZP2022-0046\DOCUMENT FINALS\ZAB\2023-05- 11_ZAB_ATT 1_Findings and Conditions_revised_3000 Shattuck.docx

74. Periodic Review and Reporting. The City may require periodic review of this approved project to verify compliance with permit requirements and conditions of approval. The permit holder or property owner is responsible for complying with any periodic reporting, monitoring, or assessments requirement. This permit is subject to the provisions of BMC Section 23.404.080 (Permit Revocation) if violations of the permit requirements are found by the Zoning Officer.

SHATTUCK AVE.

ASHBY AVE.

EMERSON ST.

PROJECT SITE
3000 SHATTUCK

GENERAL

INFORMATION
A0.0
Xref .\2120 - Titleblock 24 x36.dwg
3000

SHATTUCK

ALL DRAWINGS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL APPEARING

HEREIN CONSTITUTE ORIGINAL AND UNPUBLISHED

WORK OF THE ARCHITECT AND MAY NOT BE

DUPLICATED, USED OR DISCLOSED WITHOUT WRITTEN
CONSENT OF TRACHTENBERG ARCHITECTS.
2104 JOB:

SHEET:
2421 Fourth Street
Berkeley, California 94710
510.649.1414
www.TrachtenbergArch.com

TRACHTENBERG

ARCHITECTS

03.15.2022 ZONING APPLICATION
3000 Shattuck Ave
Berkeley, CA

07.08.2022 ZONING RESUBMITTAL

01.19.2023 DRC HEARING SET

01.20.2023 LOADING ZONE PLAN

05.11.2023 ZAB HEARING SET
N.T.S.

N

VICINITY MAPPROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT DIRECTORY

ZONING CODE SUMMARY
(BASED ON THE BERKELEY MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE)
ZONING: C-SA
SEE SHEET A0.1 FOR COMPLETE ZONING DATA
PROJECT SPONSOR:
3000 Shattuck Avenue, LLC
NX Ventures, LLC
1958A University Ave
Berkeley, CA 94704
ARCHITECT:

Isaiah Stackhouse, Principal

TRACHTENBERG ARCHITECTS
2421 Fourth Street
Berkeley, CA 94710
510.649.1414
www.trachtenbergarch.com
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT:

Penn Phillips

INSIDEOUT DESIGN
6000 Harwood Avenue
Oakland CA 94618
510.655.7674
www.aboutinsideout.com
PROJECT ADDRESS: 3000 Shattuck
Berkeley, CA 94705 (APN: 053 159200100)
SCOPE OF WORK:

REMOVAL OF EXISTING 1 STORY COMMERCIAL STRUCTURE & CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW 9-STORY MIXED-USE BUILDING WITH 156-DWELLING UNITS, GROUND LEVEL LOBBIES AND COMMERCIAL SPACE WITH STATE OF CALIFORNIA DENSITY BONUS.

DRAWING LIST
A0.0GENERAL INFORMATION
FLOOR PLANSA2.1
A1.1SITE SURVEY
A2.2
A3.1BUILDING ELEVATIONS
A3.2BUILDING ELEVATIONS
A3.3
A0.1

DENSITY BONUS DIAGRAMS
A0.5SITE CONTEXT PHOTOS
A0.3A
A0.6VICINITY MAP

ZONING INFORMATION & DIAGRAMS

FLOOR PLANS

BUILDING ELEVATIONS
A3.4BUILDING ELEVATIONS
A3.5

MATMATERIAL BOARD
A2.3FLOOR PLANS
A3.6PHOTO CONTEXT VIEWS
DENSITY BONUS CALCULATIONSA0.3B
SHADOW STUDIESA0.4A
SHADOW STUDIESA0.4B
SHADOW STUDIESA0.4C
A3.7PHOTO CONTEXT VIEWS
A3.8PERSPECTIVE VIEWS
A3.9PERSPECTIVE VIEWS
L1.0GROUND LEVEL LANDSCAPE PLAN
L1.1ROOF DECK LANDSCAPE PLAN
A4.1BUILDING SECTION

STREETSCAPE ELEVATIONS
A5.1CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN
A3.10PERSPECTIVE VIEWS
A3.11PERSPECTIVE VIEWS
A3.12PERSPECTIVE VIEWS
L2.0LANDSCAPE IMAGERY
I1.0GROUND LEVEL IRRIGATION PLAN
I1.1ROOF DECK IRRIGATION PLAN
I1.2IRRIGATION NOTES AND LEGENDS
I1.6IRRIGATION DETAILS AND WELO
A3.13PERSPECTIVE VIEWS
A3.14PERSPECTIVE VIEWS
A3.15PERSPECTIVE VIEWS
A3.16PERSPECTIVE VIEWS
I1.5IRRIGATION DETAILS
I1.4IRRIGATION DETAILS
I1.3IRRIGATION DETAILS
ATTACHMENT 2
ZAB 05-11-2023

3 CY
BIN
3 CY
BIN
96 gal
96 gal
96 gal
64 gal
64 gal
64 gal
64 gal
64 gal
64 gal
96 gal
96 gal
96 gal
96 gal
96 gal
96 gal
96 gal
96 gal
96 gal
64 gal
64 gal
64 gal
3 CY
BIN
3 CY
BIN

WASHER /
DRYER

WASHER /
DRYER

WASHER /
DRYER

WASHER /
DRYER
96 gal
96 gal
96 gal
64 gal
64 gal
64 gal
64 gal
64 gal
64 gal
96 gal
96 gal
96 gal
96 gal
96 gal
96 gal
96 gal
96 gal
96 gal
64 gal
64 gal
64 gal
64 gal
96 gal
96 gal
96 gal

GROUND LEVEL

OPEN SPACE
3,391 SQ. FT.
74'-7"
39'-5"
10'-8"
9'-0"
27'-5"
54'-10"

ROOF DECK
4,488 SQ. FT.
33'-8"25'-10"
44'-6"6'-8" 52'-2"
33'-8"
3 CY
BIN
3 CY
BIN
96 gal
96 gal
96 gal
64 gal
64 gal
64 gal
64 gal
64 gal
64 gal
96 gal
96 gal
96 gal
96 gal
96 gal
96 gal
96 gal
96 gal
96 gal
64 gal
64 gal
64 gal

ZONING DATA
A0.1

ZONING CODE DATA
LEVEL 1

REFUSE AND RECYCLING
N.T.S.

N

ZONING MAP

PROJECT SITE
3000 SHATTUCK

ROOF LEVEL

OPEN SPACE DIAGRAMS
3000

SHATTUCK

ALL DRAWINGS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL APPEARING

HEREIN CONSTITUTE ORIGINAL AND UNPUBLISHED

WORK OF THE ARCHITECT AND MAY NOT BE

DUPLICATED, USED OR DISCLOSED WITHOUT WRITTEN
CONSENT OF TRACHTENBERG ARCHITECTS.
2104 JOB:

SHEET:
2421 Fourth Street
Berkeley, California 94710
510.649.1414
www.TrachtenbergArch.com

TRACHTENBERG

ARCHITECTS

03.15.2022 ZONING APPLICATION
3000 Shattuck Ave
Berkeley, CA

07.08.2022 ZONING RESUBMITTAL

01.19.2023 DRC HEARING SET

01.20.2023 LOADING ZONE PLAN

05.11.2023 ZAB HEARING SET

LONG TERM BIKE PARKING
ATTACHMENT 2
ZAB 05-11-2023

WASHER /
DRYER

WASHER /
DRYER

WASHER /
DRYER
REF 18"
DW

WASHER /
DRYER
REF 18"
DW

WASHER /
DRYER
REF18"
DW

WASHER /
DRYER
REF18"
DW

WASHER /
DRYER
REF18"
DW

WASHER /
DRYER
REF18"
DW

WASHER /
DRYER
REF18"
DW

WASHER /
DRYER
REF18"
DW

WASHER /
DRYER
REF18"
DW

WASHER /
DRYER

WASHER /
DRYER

WASHER /
DRYER

WASHER /
DRYER

WASHER /
DRYER

WASHER /
DRYER

WASHER /
DRYER
3 CY
BIN
3 CY
BIN

WASHER /
DRYER

WASHER /
DRYER

WASHER /
DRYER

WASHER /
DRYER
96 gal
96 gal
96 gal
64 gal
64 gal
64 gal
64 gal
64 gal
64 gal
96 gal
96 gal
96 gal
96 gal
96 gal
96 gal
96 gal
96 gal
96 gal
64 gal
64 gal
64 gal
64 gal
96 gal
96 gal
96 gal
17'-4" 10'-4" 10'-4" 10'-4" 10'-4" 10'-4" 10'-4" 10'-4" 10'-4" 14'-10" 110'-4"
113'-10"

ELEVATORS
10'-4"

WASHER /
DRYER

WASHER /
DRYER

WASHER /
DRYER

WASHER /
DRYER

WASHER /
DRYER

WASHER /
DRYER

WASHER /
DRYER

WASHER /
DRYER

WASHER /
DRYER

WASHER /
DRYER

WASHER /
DRYER

WASHER /
DRYER

WASHER /
DRYER

WASHER /
DRYER

WASHER /
DRYER

WASHER /
DRYER

WASHER /
DRYER

WASHER /
DRYER

PROPOSED DENSITY BONUS PROJECT

DENSITY BONUS

DIAGRAMS
A0.3A
PLAN AT GROUND PLAN AT LEVELS 3-10
3000

SHATTUCK

ALL DRAWINGS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL APPEARING

HEREIN CONSTITUTE ORIGINAL AND UNPUBLISHED

WORK OF THE ARCHITECT AND MAY NOT BE

DUPLICATED, USED OR DISCLOSED WITHOUT WRITTEN
CONSENT OF TRACHTENBERG ARCHITECTS.
2104 JOB:

SHEET:
2421 Fourth Street
Berkeley, California 94710
510.649.1414
www.TrachtenbergArch.com

TRACHTENBERG

ARCHITECTS

03.15.2022 ZONING APPLICATION
3000 Shattuck Ave
Berkeley, CA

07.08.2022 ZONING RESUBMITTAL

01.19.2023 DRC HEARING SET

01.20.2023 LOADING ZONE PLAN

05.11.2023 ZAB HEARING SET

DENSITY BONUS DIAGRAM AREA KEY

RESIDENTIAL AREA

COMMERCIAL AREA
PLAN AT ROOFPLAN AT LEVELS 2
ATTACHMENT 2
ZAB 05-11-2023

12345678
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 21
20 SETBACKS

ALLOWED TO

BE MODIFIED
WITH UP, TYP.
3,460 SF

OPEN SPACE

SETBACKS

ALLOWED TO

BE MODIFIED
WITH UP, TYP.

SETBACKS

ALLOWED TO

BE MODIFIED
WITH UP, TYP.

SETBACKS

ALLOWED TO

BE MODIFIED
WITH UP, TYP.1234
6 5
1108 SF
38'-0"

ROOF DECK
1095 SF

UNOCCUPIED
ROOF

GRADE AT ASHBY SIDEWALK
13'-4" 10'-4"
65'-0"
10'-4" 10'-4" 10'-4" 10'-4"

ELEVATORS

DENSITY BONUS

CALCULATIONS
A0.3B
3000

SHATTUCK

ALL DRAWINGS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL APPEARING

HEREIN CONSTITUTE ORIGINAL AND UNPUBLISHED

WORK OF THE ARCHITECT AND MAY NOT BE

DUPLICATED, USED OR DISCLOSED WITHOUT WRITTEN
CONSENT OF TRACHTENBERG ARCHITECTS.
2104 JOB:

SHEET:
2421 Fourth Street
Berkeley, California 94710
510.649.1414
www.TrachtenbergArch.com

TRACHTENBERG

ARCHITECTS

03.15.2022 ZONING APPLICATION
3000 Shattuck Ave
Berkeley, CA

07.08.2022 ZONING RESUBMITTAL

01.19.2023 DRC HEARING SET

01.20.2023 LOADING ZONE PLAN

05.11.2023 ZAB HEARING SET

BASE PROJECT

PLAN AT GROUND
PLAN AT LEVELS 2-6

PLAN AT ROOF
ATTACHMENT 2
ZAB 05-11-2023

2999

RESIDENTIAL
2111

RESIDENTIAL
2971

COMMERCIAL
2921

RESIDENTIAL
2113

RESIDENTIAL

BUILDING

SHATTUCK AVE

ASHBY AVE

NEWBURY ST

EMERSON ST

PROPOSED

PROPOSED

BUILDING

SHATTUCK AVE

ASHBY AVE

NEWBURY ST
2996

COMMERCIAL
2930

COMMERCIAL
2996

COMMERCIAL
2051

COMMERCIAL
2916

RESIDENTIAL
2918

RESIDENTIAL
2920

RESIDENTIAL
2923

RESIDENTIAL

PROPOSED

BUILDING

SHATTUCK AVE

ASHBY AVE

NEWBURY ST

ASHBY AVE
2999

RESIDENTIAL

SHATTUCK AVE
2111

RESIDENTIAL
2113

RESIDENTIAL
2115

RESIDENTIAL
2117

RESIDENTIAL
2928

RESIDENTIAL
2925

COMMERCIAL
2930

COMMERCIAL
2927

COMMERCIAL
2051

COMMERCIAL
2996

COMMERCIAL
2921

RESIDENTIAL
2923

RESIDENTIAL
3001

COMMERCIAL
2110

RESIDENTIAL
2112

RESIDENTIAL
2118

RESIDENTIAL
3007

RESIDENTIAL
3011

RESIDENTIAL
2103

RESIDENTIAL
2109

RESIDENTIAL
2111

RESIDENTIAL
2121

RESIDENTIAL
2129

RESIDENTIAL
2137

RESIDENTIAL
2119

RESIDENTIAL
2916

RESIDENTIAL
2918

RESIDENTIAL
2920

RESIDENTIAL
2047

RESIDENTIAL
2041

RESIDENTIAL
2043

RESIDENTIAL
2035

RESIDENTIAL
2076
RESIDENTIAL 2040

RESIDENTIAL
2034

RESIDENTIAL
2030

RESIDENTIAL
3010

RESIDENTIAL
2024

RESIDENTIAL
2045

RESIDENTIAL
2075

RESIDENTIAL
3014

COMMERCIAL
2071

RESIDENTIAL
2065

RESIDENTIAL
2071

RESIDENTIAL
2971

RESIDENTIAL

NEWBURY ST

PROPOSED

BUILDING

ASHBY AVE
2999

RESIDENTIAL

SHATTUCK AVE
2111

RESIDENTIAL
2113

RESIDENTIAL
2115

RESIDENTIAL
2117

RESIDENTIAL
2928

RESIDENTIAL
2925

COMMERCIAL
2930

COMMERCIAL
2927

COMMERCIAL
2051

COMMERCIAL
2996

COMMERCIAL
2921

RESIDENTIAL
2923

RESIDENTIAL
3001

COMMERCIAL
2110

RESIDENTIAL
2112

RESIDENTIAL
2118

RESIDENTIAL
3007

RESIDENTIAL
3011

RESIDENTIAL
2103

RESIDENTIAL
2109

RESIDENTIAL
2111

RESIDENTIAL
2121

RESIDENTIAL
2129

RESIDENTIAL
2137

RESIDENTIAL
2119

RESIDENTIAL
2916

RESIDENTIAL
2918

RESIDENTIAL
2920

RESIDENTIAL
2047

RESIDENTIAL
2041

RESIDENTIAL
2043

RESIDENTIAL
2035

RESIDENTIAL
2076
RESIDENTIAL 2040

RESIDENTIAL
2034

RESIDENTIAL
2030

RESIDENTIAL
3010

RESIDENTIAL
2024

RESIDENTIAL
2045

RESIDENTIAL
2075

RESIDENTIAL
3014

COMMERCIAL
2071

RESIDENTIAL
2065

RESIDENTIAL
2071

RESIDENTIAL
2971

RESIDENTIAL

NEWBURY ST

PROPOSED

BUILDING
2921

RESIDENTIAL

NEW SHADOWS CAST ONEXISTING RESIDENTIAL

ASHBY AVE
2999

RESIDENTIAL

SHATTUCK AVE
2111

RESIDENTIAL
2113

RESIDENTIAL
2115

RESIDENTIAL
2117

RESIDENTIAL
2928

RESIDENTIAL
2925

COMMERCIAL
2930

COMMERCIAL
2927

COMMERCIAL
2051

COMMERCIAL
2996

COMMERCIAL
2921

RESIDENTIAL
2923

RESIDENTIAL
3001

COMMERCIAL
2110

RESIDENTIAL
2112

RESIDENTIAL
2118

RESIDENTIAL
3007

RESIDENTIAL
3011

RESIDENTIAL
2111

RESIDENTIAL
2121

RESIDENTIAL
2129

RESIDENTIAL
2137

RESIDENTIAL
2119

RESIDENTIAL
2916

RESIDENTIAL
2918

RESIDENTIAL
2920

RESIDENTIAL
2047

RESIDENTIAL
2041

RESIDENTIAL
2043

RESIDENTIAL
2035

RESIDENTIAL
2076
RESIDENTIAL 2040

RESIDENTIAL
2034

RESIDENTIAL
2030

RESIDENTIAL
3010

RESIDENTIAL
2024
RESIDENTIAL2071

RESIDENTIAL
2971

RESIDENTIAL

NEWBURY ST

PROPOSED

BUILDING

NEW SHADOWS CAST ON

EXISTING RESIDENTIAL

NEW SHADOWS CAST ONEXISTING RESIDENTIAL

LIGHTER TONE GREY INDICATES SHADOWS

FROM PROPOSED BUILDING

DARK TONE GREY INDICATES SHADOWS

FROM EXISTING BUILDINGS

ALL RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS BEING

SHADOWED SHOWN IN THESE DIAGRAMS

NEW SHADOW AT RESIDENTIAL BUILDING

LIGHTER TONE GREY INDICATES SHADOWS

FROM PROPOSED BUILDING

DARK TONE GREY INDICATES SHADOWS

FROM EXISTING BUILDINGS

ALL RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS BEING

SHADOWED SHOWN IN THESE DIAGRAMS

NEW SHADOW AT RESIDENTIAL BUILDING

LIGHTER TONE GREY INDICATES SHADOWS

FROM PROPOSED BUILDING

DARK TONE GREY INDICATES SHADOWS

FROM EXISTING BUILDINGS

ALL RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS BEING

SHADOWED SHOWN IN THESE DIAGRAMS

NEW SHADOW AT RESIDENTIAL BUILDING
3000

SHATTUCK

ALL DRAWINGS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL APPEARING

HEREIN CONSTITUTE ORIGINAL AND UNPUBLISHED

WORK OF THE ARCHITECT AND MAY NOT BE

DUPLICATED, USED OR DISCLOSED WITHOUT WRITTEN
CONSENT OF TRACHTENBERG ARCHITECTS.
2104 JOB:

SHEET:
2421 Fourth Street
Berkeley, California 94710
510.649.1414
www.TrachtenbergArch.com

TRACHTENBERG

ARCHITECTS

03.15.2022 ZONING APPLICATION
3000 Shattuck Ave
Berkeley, CA

07.08.2022 ZONING RESUBMITTAL

01.19.2023 DRC HEARING SET

01.20.2023 LOADING ZONE PLAN

05.11.2023 ZAB HEARING SET

SHADOW STUDIES
DECEMBER 21ST
A0.4A
N

WINTER SOLSTICE
DEC 21ST:
2-HRS BEFORE SUNSET (PM)

WINTER SOLSTICE
DEC 21ST:

NOON

WINTER SOLSTICE
DEC 21ST:
2-HRS AFTER SUNRISE (AM)
3SHADOW STUDY - NOON
1:160 @ 11X17 1:80 @ 24X36
5SHADOW STUDY - PM
1:160 @ 11X17 1:80 @ 24X36
1SHADOW STUDY - AM
1:160 @ 11X17 1:80 @ 24X36
2SHADOW STUDY AXONOMETRIC - AM
N.T.S.
4SHADOW STUDY AXONOMETRIC - NOON
NT.S.
6SHADOW STUDY AXONOMETRIC - PM
N.T.S.

N
N
ATTACHMENT 2
ZAB 05-11-2023

LIGHTER TONE GREY INDICATES SHADOWS

FROM PROPOSED BUILDING

DARK TONE GREY INDICATES SHADOWS

FROM EXISTING BUILDINGS

ALL RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS BEING

SHADOWED SHOWN IN THESE DIAGRAMS

NEW SHADOW AT RESIDENTIAL BUILDING

ASHBY AVE
2999

RESIDENTIAL

SHATTUCK AVE
2111

RESIDENTIAL
2113

RESIDENTIAL
2115

RESIDENTIAL
2117

RESIDENTIAL
2925

COMMERCIAL
2930RESIDENTIAL
2927

COMMERCIAL
2051

COMMERCIAL
2996

COMMERCIAL

RESIDENTIAL
3001

COMMERCIAL
2110

RESIDENTIAL
2112

RESIDENTIAL
2118

RESIDENTIAL
3007

RESIDENTIAL
3011

RESIDENTIAL
2103

RESIDENTIAL
2109

RESIDENTIAL
2111

RESIDENTIAL
2121

RESIDENTIAL
2129

RESIDENTIAL
2137

RESIDENTIAL
2119

RESIDENTIAL
2918

RESIDENTIAL
2920

RESIDENTIAL
2047

RESIDENTIAL
2041

RESIDENTIAL
2043

RESIDENTIAL
2035

RESIDENTIAL
2076

RESIDENTIAL
2040

RESIDENTIAL
2034

RESIDENTIAL
2030

RESIDENTIAL
1214

RESIDENTIAL
1214

RESIDENTIAL
3104

RESIDENTIAL
3010

RESIDENTIAL

PROPOSED

BUILDING

ASHBY AVE
2999

RESIDENTIAL

SHATTUCK AVE
2111

RESIDENTIAL
2113

RESIDENTIAL
2115

RESIDENTIAL
2117

RESIDENTIAL
2930RESIDENTIAL
2927

COMMERCIAL
2051

COMMERCIAL
2996

COMMERCIAL
3001

COMMERCIAL
2110

RESIDENTIAL
2112

RESIDENTIAL
2118

RESIDENTIAL
3007

RESIDENTIAL
3011

RESIDENTIAL
2103

RESIDENTIAL
2109

RESIDENTIAL
2111

RESIDENTIAL
2121

RESIDENTIAL
2129

RESIDENTIAL
2137

RESIDENTIAL
2119

RESIDENTIAL
2918

RESIDENTIAL
2920

RESIDENTIAL
2047

RESIDENTIAL
2041

RESIDENTIAL
2043

RESIDENTIAL
2076

RESIDENTIAL
2040

RESIDENTIAL
2034

RESIDENTIAL
2030

RESIDENTIAL
1214

RESIDENTIAL
1214

RESIDENTIAL
3104

RESIDENTIAL
3010

RESIDENTIAL

PROPOSED

BUILDING

ASHBY AVE
2999

RESIDENTIAL

SHATTUCK AVE
2111

RESIDENTIAL
2113

RESIDENTIAL
2115

RESIDENTIAL
2117

RESIDENTIAL

COMMERCIAL
2930RESIDENTIAL
2927

COMMERCIAL
2051

COMMERCIAL
2996

COMMERCIAL
3001

COMMERCIAL
2110

RESIDENTIAL
2112

RESIDENTIAL
2118

RESIDENTIAL
3007

RESIDENTIAL
3011

RESIDENTIAL
2103

RESIDENTIAL
2109

RESIDENTIAL
2111

RESIDENTIAL
2121

RESIDENTIAL
2129

RESIDENTIAL
2137

RESIDENTIAL
2119

RESIDENTIAL
2918

RESIDENTIAL
2920

RESIDENTIAL
2047

RESIDENTIAL
2041

RESIDENTIAL
2043

RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL
2076

RESIDENTIAL
2040

RESIDENTIAL
2034

RESIDENTIAL
2030

RESIDENTIAL
1214

RESIDENTIAL
1214

RESIDENTIAL
3104

RESIDENTIAL
3010

RESIDENTIAL

PROPOSED

BUILDING
3001

COMMERCIAL
2110

RESIDENTIAL
2112

RESIDENTIAL
2118

RESIDENTIAL
3007

RESIDENTIAL
3011

RESIDENTIAL
2103

RESIDENTIAL
2109

RESIDENTIAL
2111

RESIDENTIAL
2121

RESIDENTIAL
2129

RESIDENTIAL
2119

RESIDENTIAL
(N) SHADOW ON

LIVING ROOMS
(N) SHADOW ON

BEDROOMS
(N) SHADOW ON

BEDROOMS
(N) SHADOW ON

BEDROOMS
(N) SHADOW ON

BEDROOMS
(N) SHADOW ON

BEDROOMS
(N) SHADOW ON

LIVING ROOMS
(N) SHADOW ON

BEDROOMS
2076

RESIDENTIAL
2040

RESIDENTIAL
2034

RESIDENTIAL
2030

RESIDENTIAL
2071

RESIDENTIAL
2075

RESIDENTIAL
2045

RESIDENTIAL

PROPOSED

BUILDING
(N) SHADOW ON

BEDROOMS(N) SHADOW ON

BEDROOMS
(N) SHADOW ON

BEDROOMS
3000

SHATTUCK

ALL DRAWINGS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL APPEARING

HEREIN CONSTITUTE ORIGINAL AND UNPUBLISHED

WORK OF THE ARCHITECT AND MAY NOT BE

DUPLICATED, USED OR DISCLOSED WITHOUT WRITTEN
CONSENT OF TRACHTENBERG ARCHITECTS.
2104 JOB:

SHEET:

03.15.2022 ZONING APPLICATION
3000 Shattuck Ave
Berkeley, CA

07.08.22 ZONING INCOMPLETE RESPONSE

SHADOW STUDIES
JUNE 21ST
A0.4B
2SHADOW STUDY - JUNE 21: 2 HRS AFTER SUNRISE
1:130 @ 11X17 1:65 @ 24X36
3SHADOW STUDY - JUNE 21: NOON
1:130 @ 11X17 1:65 @ 24X36
1SHADOW STUDY - JUNE 21: 2-HRS BEFORE SUNSET
1:130 @ 11X17 1:65 @ 24X36
4SHADOW STUDY AXONOMETRIC - JUN 21: 2-HRS BEFORE SUNSET NTS
5SHADOW STUDY AXONOMETRIC - JUNE 21: 2-HRS AFTER SUNRISE NTS
ATTACHMENT 2
ZAB 05-11-2023

LIGHTER TONE GREY INDICATES SHADOWS

FROM PROPOSED BUILDING

DARK TONE GREY INDICATES SHADOWS

FROM EXISTING BUILDINGS

ALL RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS BEING

SHADOWED SHOWN IN THESE DIAGRAMS

NEW SHADOW AT RESIDENTIAL BUILDING

ASHBY AVE
2999

RESIDENTIAL

SHATTUCK AVE
2111

RESIDENTIAL
2113

RESIDENTIAL
2115

RESIDENTIAL
2117

RESIDENTIAL
2925

COMMERCIAL
2930RESIDENTIAL
2927

COMMERCIAL
2051

COMMERCIAL
2996

COMMERCIAL

RESIDENTIAL
3001

COMMERCIAL
2110

RESIDENTIAL
2112

RESIDENTIAL
2118

RESIDENTIAL
3007

RESIDENTIAL
3011

RESIDENTIAL
2103

RESIDENTIAL
2109

RESIDENTIAL
2111

RESIDENTIAL
2121

RESIDENTIAL
2129

RESIDENTIAL
2119

RESIDENTIAL
2918

RESIDENTIAL
2920

RESIDENTIAL
2047

RESIDENTIAL
2041

RESIDENTIAL
2043

RESIDENTIAL
2035

RESIDENTIAL
2076

RESIDENTIAL
2040

RESIDENTIAL
2034

RESIDENTIAL
2030

RESIDENTIAL
1214

RESIDENTIAL
1214

RESIDENTIAL
3104

RESIDENTIAL
3010

RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL

PROPOSED

BUILDING

ASHBY AVE
2999

RESIDENTIAL

SHATTUCK AVE
2111

RESIDENTIAL
2113

RESIDENTIAL
2115

RESIDENTIAL
2117

RESIDENTIAL
2925

COMMERCIAL
2930RESIDENTIAL
2927

COMMERCIAL
2051

COMMERCIAL
2996

COMMERCIAL
2923

RESIDENTIAL
3001

COMMERCIAL
2110

RESIDENTIAL
2112

RESIDENTIAL
2118

RESIDENTIAL
3007

RESIDENTIAL
3011

RESIDENTIAL
2103

RESIDENTIAL
2109

RESIDENTIAL
2111

RESIDENTIAL
2121

RESIDENTIAL
2129

RESIDENTIAL
2119

RESIDENTIAL
2918

RESIDENTIAL
2920

RESIDENTIAL
2047

RESIDENTIAL
2041

RESIDENTIAL
2043

RESIDENTIAL
2035

RESIDENTIAL
2076

RESIDENTIAL
2040

RESIDENTIAL
2034

RESIDENTIAL
2030

RESIDENTIAL
1214

RESIDENTIAL
3010

RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL

PROPOSED

BUILDING

PROPOSED

BUILDING

ASHBY AVE
2999

RESIDENTIAL

SHATTUCK AVE
2111

RESIDENTIAL
2113

RESIDENTIAL
2115

RESIDENTIAL
2117

RESIDENTIAL
2927

COMMERCIAL
2051

COMMERCIAL
2996

COMMERCIAL
3001

COMMERCIAL
2110

RESIDENTIAL
2112

RESIDENTIALRESIDENTIAL
3007

RESIDENTIAL
3011

RESIDENTIAL
2103

RESIDENTIAL
2109

RESIDENTIAL
2111

RESIDENTIAL
2121

RESIDENTIAL
2129

RESIDENTIAL
2119

RESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIAL
2920

RESIDENTIAL
2047

RESIDENTIAL
2041

RESIDENTIAL
2043

RESIDENTIAL
2035

RESIDENTIAL
2076

RESIDENTIAL
2040

RESIDENTIAL
2034

RESIDENTIAL
2030

RESIDENTIAL
1214

RESIDENTIAL
1214

RESIDENTIAL
3104

RESIDENTIAL
3010

RESIDENTIAL
2024

RESIDENTIAL
3001

COMMERCIAL
2110

RESIDENTIAL
2112

RESIDENTIAL
2118

RESIDENTIAL
3007

RESIDENTIAL
3011

RESIDENTIAL
2103

RESIDENTIAL
2109

RESIDENTIAL
2111

RESIDENTIAL
2121

RESIDENTIAL
2129

RESIDENTIAL
2119

RESIDENTIAL
(N) SHADOW ON

LIVING ROOMS
(N) SHADOW ON

BEDROOMS
(N) SHADOW ON

BEDROOMS
(N) SHADOW ON

BEDROOMS
(N) SHADOW ON

BEDROOMS
(N) SHADOW ON

BEDROOMS
(N) SHADOW ON

LIVING ROOMS
(N) SHADOW ON

BEDROOMS
2076

RESIDENTIAL
2040

RESIDENTIAL
2034

RESIDENTIAL
2030

RESIDENTIAL
2071
RESIDENTIAL 2075

RESIDENTIAL
2045

RESIDENTIAL

PROPOSED

BUILDING
(N) SHADOW ON

BEDROOMS
(N) SHADOW ON

BEDROOMS
(N) SHADOW ON

BEDROOMS
3000

SHATTUCK

ALL DRAWINGS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL APPEARING

HEREIN CONSTITUTE ORIGINAL AND UNPUBLISHED

WORK OF THE ARCHITECT AND MAY NOT BE

DUPLICATED, USED OR DISCLOSED WITHOUT WRITTEN
CONSENT OF TRACHTENBERG ARCHITECTS.
2104 JOB:

SHEET:

03.15.2022 ZONING APPLICATION
3000 Shattuck Ave
Berkeley, CA

07.08.22 ZONING INCOMPLETE RESPONSE

SHADOW STUDIES
JULY 8TH
A0.4C
2SHADOW STUDY - JULY 8: 2 HRS AFTER SUNRISE
1:130 @ 11X17 1:65 @ 24X36
3SHADOW STUDY - JULY 8: NOON
1:130 @ 11X17 1:65 @ 24X36
1SHADOW STUDY - JULY 8: 2-HRS BEFORE SUNSET
1:130 @ 11X17 1:65 @ 24X36
4SHADOW STUDY AXONOMETRIC - JULY 8: 2-HRS BEFORE SUNSET NTS
5SHADOW STUDY AXONOMETRIC - JULY 8: 2 HRS AFTER SUNRISE 1:100 @ 11X17 1:50 @ 24X36
ATTACHMENT 2
ZAB 05-11-2023

SITE CONTEXT
PHOTOS
A0.5
1 -
GOOGLE EARTH BIRD'S EYE CONTEXT VIEW 3
-

VIEW FROM SHATTUCK LOOKING NORTH
4 -
VIEW FROM SHATTUCK LOOKING SOUTH2
-

VIEW FROM ASHBY LOOKING WEST
3000

SHATTUCK

ALL DRAWINGS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL APPEARING

HEREIN CONSTITUTE ORIGINAL AND UNPUBLISHED

WORK OF THE ARCHITECT AND MAY NOT BE

DUPLICATED, USED OR DISCLOSED WITHOUT WRITTEN
CONSENT OF TRACHTENBERG ARCHITECTS.
2104 JOB:

SHEET:

03.15.2022 ZONING APPLICATION
3000 Shattuck Ave
Berkeley, CA

07.08.22 ZONING INCOMPLETE RESPONSE
3000 SHATTUCK

PROJECT SITE
2076 SHATTUCK
(3-STORY MULTIFAMILY)
2999 SHATTUCK
(3-STORY MIXED-USE)
3001 SHATTUCK
(1-STORY COMMERCIAL)
2999 SHATTUCK
(1-STORY COMMERCIAL)
3014 SHTTUCK
(3-STORY

RESIDENTIAL)
3010 SHTTUCK
(2-STORY

RESIDENTIAL)
2076 SHATTUCK
(3-STORY MULTIFAMILY)
2999 SHATTUCK
(3-STORY MULTIFAMILY)
3011 SHATTUCK
(2-STORY RESIDENTIAL)
3011 SHATTUCK
(2-STORY MIXED-USE) 3000 SHATTUCK

PROJECT SITE
3001 SHATTUCK
(1-STORY COMMERCIAL) 3000 SHATTUCK

PROJECT SITE
2076 SHATTUCK
(3-STORY MULTIFAMILY)
2999 SHATTUCK
(3-STORY MIXED USE)
2971 SHATTUCK
(1-STORY COMMERCIAL)
2929 SHATTUCK
(1-STORY COMMERCIAL)
3000 SHATTUCK

PROJECT SITE
ATTACHMENT 2
ZAB 05-11-2023

PROJECT SITE
3000 SHATTUCK
3000
ASHBY AVE.

SHATTUCK AVE.
3001
3008
3010
3014
3007
3011
210321092111
2121
2075
2071
2057
2045
2037
2033
2025
2021
2076
2040
2034
2030
2024
2024
2016
2996
2999
2930
2925
2921
2917
2915
2911
2913
2917
2921
2923
2927
2051
2047
2043
2041
2918
2916
2914
2912
2910
2906
2920
2111
21132115
2117
2110
2112
2118
2124
2048
2044
2036 2030
2022
20562064
2070
2080
3020
3022
3026
3021
3023
3025
2118
212221262132
2121
2121
2021
2021
3021
3023
2909
2903
2911
2917
2923
2001
2004
2928
2926
2922
2916

VICINITY MAP
A0.6
1 -

VICINITY MAP
NTS
N
3000

SHATTUCK

ALL DRAWINGS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL APPEARING

HEREIN CONSTITUTE ORIGINAL AND UNPUBLISHED

WORK OF THE ARCHITECT AND MAY NOT BE

DUPLICATED, USED OR DISCLOSED WITHOUT WRITTEN
CONSENT OF TRACHTENBERG ARCHITECTS.
2104 JOB:

SHEET:

03.15.2022 ZONING APPLICATION
3000 Shattuck Ave
Berkeley, CA

07.08.22 ZONING INCOMPLETE RESPONSE
ATTACHMENT 2
ZAB 05-11-2023

3000

SHATTUCK

ALL DRAWINGS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL APPEARING

HEREIN CONSTITUTE ORIGINAL AND UNPUBLISHED

WORK OF THE ARCHITECT AND MAY NOT BE

DUPLICATED, USED OR DISCLOSED WITHOUT WRITTEN
CONSENT OF TRACHTENBERG ARCHITECTS.
2104 JOB:

SHEET:

03.15.2022 ZONING APPLICATION
3000 Shattuck Ave
Berkeley, CA

07.08.22 ZONING INCOMPLETE RESPONSE

SURVEY /

EXISTING CONDITIONS
A1.1
1 -

SURVEY / EXISTING CONDITIONS
3/64" = 1'-0" @ 24X36 3/32' = 1'-0" @ 11X17
ATTACHMENT 2
ZAB 05-11-2023

ATTACHMENT 2
ZAB 05-11-2023

WASHER /
DRYER

WASHER /
DRYER
5'-7"
11'-3" 75'-6" 35'-0" 3'-2"
104'-4"
124'-11"
36'-6"10'-8"52'-8"11'-3"
124'-11"
112'-1"
39'-4"63'-8"
104'-11"

PROPERTY LINE

PROPERTY LINE

PROPERTY LINE

PROPERTY LINE
29'-6" 4'-6" 20'-6" 9'-0"2'-6"
2'-2"
10'-8"
110'-6"

WASHER /
DRYER

WASHER /
DRYER

WASHER /
DRYER

WASHER /
DRYER

WASHER /
DRYER

WASHER /
DRYER

WASHER /
DRYER

WASHER /
DRYER

WASHER /
DRYER

WASHER /
DRYER

WASHER /
DRYER

WASHER /
DRYER

WASHER /
DRYER

WASHER /
DRYER

WASHER /
DRYER

WASHER /
DRYER
3000

SHATTUCK

ALL DRAWINGS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL APPEARING

HEREIN CONSTITUTE ORIGINAL AND UNPUBLISHED

WORK OF THE ARCHITECT AND MAY NOT BE

DUPLICATED, USED OR DISCLOSED WITHOUT WRITTEN
CONSENT OF TRACHTENBERG ARCHITECTS.
2104 JOB:

SHEET:
2421 Fourth Street
Berkeley, California 94710
510.649.1414
www.TrachtenbergArch.com

TRACHTENBERG

ARCHITECTS

03.15.2022 ZONING APPLICATION
3000 Shattuck Ave
Berkeley, CA

07.08.2022 ZONING RESUBMITTAL

01.19.2023 DRC HEARING SET

01.20.2023 LOADING ZONE PLAN

05.11.2023 ZAB HEARING SET

PLAN AT
LEVEL 2
A2.2
1 -
PLAN AT LEVEL 2
1/8" = 1'-0" @ 24X36 1/16" = 1'-0" @ 11X17
ATTACHMENT 2
ZAB 05-11-2023

5'-7"
11'-3" 75'-6" 35'-0" 3'-2"
104'-4"
124'-11"
38'-0"10'-8"52'-8"11'-3" 1'-8"
124'-11"
112'-1"
39'-6"65'-0"
104'-11"

PROPERTY LINE

PROPERTY LINE

PROPERTY LINE

PROPERTY LINE
31'-0" 4'-6" 20'-6" 9'-0"1'-0"
2'-2"
10'-8"
112'-0"

WASHER /
DRYER

WASHER /
DRYER

WASHER /
DRYER
REF 18"
DW

WASHER /
DRYER
REF 18"
DW

WASHER /
DRYER
REF18"
DW

WASHER /
DRYER
REF18"
DW

WASHER /
DRYER
REF
18"
DW

WASHER /
DRYER
REF
18"
DW

WASHER /
DRYER
REF
18"
DW

WASHER /
DRYER
REF
18"
DW

WASHER /
DRYER
REF
18"
DW

WASHER /
DRYER

WASHER /
DRYER
1'-8"

WASHER /
DRYER

WASHER /
DRYER

WASHER /
DRYER

WASHER /
DRYER

WASHER /
DRYER
3000

SHATTUCK

ALL DRAWINGS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL APPEARING

HEREIN CONSTITUTE ORIGINAL AND UNPUBLISHED

WORK OF THE ARCHITECT AND MAY NOT BE

DUPLICATED, USED OR DISCLOSED WITHOUT WRITTEN
CONSENT OF TRACHTENBERG ARCHITECTS.
2104 JOB:

SHEET:
2421 Fourth Street
Berkeley, California 94710
510.649.1414
www.TrachtenbergArch.com

TRACHTENBERG

ARCHITECTS

03.15.2022 ZONING APPLICATION
3000 Shattuck Ave
Berkeley, CA

07.08.2022 ZONING RESUBMITTAL

01.19.2023 DRC HEARING SET

01.20.2023 LOADING ZONE PLAN

05.11.2023 ZAB HEARING SET
PLANS
FLOORS 3-10
A2.3
1 -
FLOORS 3-10 PLANS
1/8" = 1'-0" @ 24X36 1/16" = 1'-0" @ 11X17
ATTACHMENT 2
ZAB 05-11-2023

PROPERTY LINE

PROPERTY LINE

PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE

UNOCCUPIED ROOF

POTENTIAL

LOCATION OF

SOLAR AREA
15% OF ROOF MIN.

POTENTIAL

LOCATION OF

EQUIPMENT
WCMECH
3000

SHATTUCK

ALL DRAWINGS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL APPEARING

HEREIN CONSTITUTE ORIGINAL AND UNPUBLISHED

WORK OF THE ARCHITECT AND MAY NOT BE

DUPLICATED, USED OR DISCLOSED WITHOUT WRITTEN
CONSENT OF TRACHTENBERG ARCHITECTS.
2104JOB:

SHEET:
2421 Fourth Street
Berkeley, California 94710
510.649.1414
www.TrachtenbergArch.com

TRACHTENBERG

ARCHITECTS

03.15.2022 ZONING APPLICATION
3000 Shattuck Ave
Berkeley, CA

07.08.2022 ZONING RESUBMITTAL

01.19.2023 DRC HEARING SET

01.20.2023 LOADING ZONE PLAN

05.11.2023 ZAB HEARING SET

PLAN AT

ROOF DECK LEVEL
A2.4
1 -

PLAN AT ROOF DECK LEVEL
1/8" = 1'-0" @ 24X36 1/16" = 1'-0" @ 11X17
ATTACHMENT 2
ZAB 05-11-2023

+217
AVG. GRADE
LEVEL 2
LEVEL 3
LEVEL 4
LEVEL 5
LEVEL 6
LEVEL 7
17'-4"
110'-4"
10'-4"10'-4"10'-4"10'-4"10'-4"10'-4" 10'-4" 10'-4"
LEVEL 8
LEVEL 9
10'-6"
T.O. ELEV. ROOF

ROOF DECK

PARAPET
3'-6"10'-4"
LEVEL 10

BUILDING

ELEVATIONS
A3.1
1 -

EAST ELEVATION
1/16"=1'-0" @ 11X17 1/8" = 1'-0" @ 24X36

METAL INFILL
PANEL

INSULATED

METAL PANELSALUMINUM

WINDOWS
8 0416
3000

SHATTUCK

ALL DRAWINGS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL APPEARING

HEREIN CONSTITUTE ORIGINAL AND UNPUBLISHED

WORK OF THE ARCHITECT AND MAY NOT BE

DUPLICATED, USED OR DISCLOSED WITHOUT WRITTEN
CONSENT OF TRACHTENBERG ARCHITECTS.
2104 JOB:

SHEET:
2421 Fourth Street
Berkeley, California 94710
510.649.1414
www.TrachtenbergArch.com

TRACHTENBERG

ARCHITECTS

03.15.2022 ZONING APPLICATION
3000 Shattuck Ave
Berkeley, CA

07.08.2022 ZONING RESUBMITTAL

01.19.2023 DRC HEARING SET

01.20.2023 LOADING ZONE PLAN

05.11.2023 ZAB HEARING SET

DECORATIVE

METAL SCREEN
(ASHBY AVE.)

INSULATED

METAL PANELS
ATTACHMENT 2
ZAB 05-11-2023

AVG. GRADE
LEVEL 2
LEVEL 3
LEVEL 4
LEVEL 5
LEVEL 6
LEVEL 7
17'-4"
110'-4"
10'-4"10'-4"10'-4"10'-4"10'-4"10'-4" 10'-4" 10'-4"
LEVEL 8
LEVEL 9
10'-6"
T.O. ELEV. ROOF

ROOF DECK

PARAPET
3'-6"10'-4"
LEVEL 10

BUILDING

ELEVATIONS
A3.2
1 -

NORTH ELEVATION
1/16"=1'-0" @ 11X17 1/8" = 1'-0" @ 24X36

ALUMINUM

WINDOWS

INSULATED

METAL PANELS
3000

SHATTUCK

ALL DRAWINGS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL APPEARING

HEREIN CONSTITUTE ORIGINAL AND UNPUBLISHED

WORK OF THE ARCHITECT AND MAY NOT BE

DUPLICATED, USED OR DISCLOSED WITHOUT WRITTEN
CONSENT OF TRACHTENBERG ARCHITECTS.
2104 JOB:

SHEET:
2421 Fourth Street
Berkeley, California 94710
510.649.1414
www.TrachtenbergArch.com

TRACHTENBERG

ARCHITECTS

03.15.2022 ZONING APPLICATION
3000 Shattuck Ave
Berkeley, CA

07.08.2022 ZONING RESUBMITTAL

01.19.2023 DRC HEARING SET

01.20.2023 LOADING ZONE PLAN

05.11.2023 ZAB HEARING SET

DECORATIVE

METAL SCREEN

METAL INFILL
PANELS
8 0416
(SHATTUCK AVE.)
ATTACHMENT 2
ZAB 05-11-2023

AVG. GRADE
LEVEL 2
LEVEL 3
LEVEL 4
LEVEL 5
LEVEL 6
LEVEL 7
17'-4"
110'-4"
10'-4"10'-4"10'-4"10'-4"10'-4"10'-4" 10'-4" 10'-4"
LEVEL 8
LEVEL 9
10'-6"
T.O. ELEV. ROOF

ROOF DECK

PARAPET
3'-6"10'-4"
LEVEL 10

BUILDING

ELEVATIONS
A3.3
1 -

WEST ELEVATION
1/16"=1'-0" @ 11X17 1/8" = 1'-0" @ 24X36

METAL INFILL
PANEL

INSULATED

METAL PANELS

INSULATED

METAL PANELS

ALUMINUM

WINDOWS
3000

SHATTUCK

ALL DRAWINGS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL APPEARING

HEREIN CONSTITUTE ORIGINAL AND UNPUBLISHED

WORK OF THE ARCHITECT AND MAY NOT BE

DUPLICATED, USED OR DISCLOSED WITHOUT WRITTEN
CONSENT OF TRACHTENBERG ARCHITECTS.
2104 JOB:

SHEET:
2421 Fourth Street
Berkeley, California 94710
510.649.1414
www.TrachtenbergArch.com

TRACHTENBERG

ARCHITECTS

03.15.2022 ZONING APPLICATION
3000 Shattuck Ave
Berkeley, CA

07.08.2022 ZONING RESUBMITTAL

01.19.2023 DRC HEARING SET

01.20.2023 LOADING ZONE PLAN

05.11.2023 ZAB HEARING SET
8 0416

WOOD FENCE
(ASHBY AVE.)

DECORATIVE

METAL SCREEN
ATTACHMENT 2
ZAB 05-11-2023

AVG. GRADE
LEVEL 2
LEVEL 3
LEVEL 4
LEVEL 5
LEVEL 6
LEVEL 7
17'-4"
110'-4"
10'-4"10'-4"10'-4"10'-4"10'-4"10'-4" 10'-4" 10'-4"
LEVEL 8
LEVEL 9
10'-6"
T.O. ELEV. ROOF

ROOF DECK

PARAPET
3'-6"10'-4"
LEVEL 10

BUILDING

ELEVATIONS
A3.4
1 -

SOUTH ELEVATION
1/16"=1'-0" @ 11X17 1/8" = 1'-0" @ 24X36

METAL INFILL
PANEL

INSULATED

METAL PANELS

ALUMINUM

WINDOWS
3000

SHATTUCK

ALL DRAWINGS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL APPEARING

HEREIN CONSTITUTE ORIGINAL AND UNPUBLISHED

WORK OF THE ARCHITECT AND MAY NOT BE

DUPLICATED, USED OR DISCLOSED WITHOUT WRITTEN
CONSENT OF TRACHTENBERG ARCHITECTS.
2104 JOB:

SHEET:
2421 Fourth Street
Berkeley, California 94710
510.649.1414
www.TrachtenbergArch.com

TRACHTENBERG

ARCHITECTS

03.15.2022 ZONING APPLICATION
3000 Shattuck Ave
Berkeley, CA

07.08.2022 ZONING RESUBMITTAL

01.19.2023 DRC HEARING SET

01.20.2023 LOADING ZONE PLAN

05.11.2023 ZAB HEARING SET

INSULATED

METAL PANELS
8 0416

WOOD FENCE
(SHATTUCK AVE.)

DECORATIVE

METAL SCREEN
ATTACHMENT 2
ZAB 05-11-2023

2034 ASHBY
3001 SHATTUCK
(SHATTUCK AVE.)
2076 ASHBY2040 ASHBY
(EMERSON ST.)(ASHBY AVE.)
3014 SHATTUCK3010 SHATTUCK2996 SHATTUCK

STREET STRIP

ELEVATIONS
A3.5
2 -
STREET STRIP ELEVATION @ ASHBY AVENUE
1/32"=1'-0" @ 11X17 1/16" = 1'-0" @ 24X36
1 -
STREET STRIP ELEVATION @ SHATTUCK AVENUE
1/32"=1'-0" @ 11X17 1/16" = 1'-0" @ 24X36
0481632
0481632
3000

SHATTUCK

ALL DRAWINGS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL APPEARING

HEREIN CONSTITUTE ORIGINAL AND UNPUBLISHED

WORK OF THE ARCHITECT AND MAY NOT BE

DUPLICATED, USED OR DISCLOSED WITHOUT WRITTEN
CONSENT OF TRACHTENBERG ARCHITECTS.
2104 JOB:

SHEET:
2421 Fourth Street
Berkeley, California 94710
510.649.1414
www.TrachtenbergArch.com

TRACHTENBERG

ARCHITECTS

03.15.2022 ZONING APPLICATION
3000 Shattuck Ave
Berkeley, CA

07.08.2022 ZONING RESUBMITTAL

01.19.2023 DRC HEARING SET

01.20.2023 LOADING ZONE PLAN

05.11.2023 ZAB HEARING SET
ATTACHMENT 2
ZAB 05-11-2023

PHOTO CONTEXT
VIEWS
A3.6 3
-

SHATTUCK LOOKING NORTH - BEFORE
4 -

SHATTUCK LOOKING NORTH - AFTER
3000

SHATTUCK

ALL DRAWINGS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL APPEARING

HEREIN CONSTITUTE ORIGINAL AND UNPUBLISHED

WORK OF THE ARCHITECT AND MAY NOT BE

DUPLICATED, USED OR DISCLOSED WITHOUT WRITTEN
CONSENT OF TRACHTENBERG ARCHITECTS.
2104 JOB:

SHEET:
2421 Fourth Street
Berkeley, California 94710
510.649.1414
www.TrachtenbergArch.com

TRACHTENBERG

ARCHITECTS

03.15.2022 ZONING APPLICATION
3000 Shattuck Ave
Berkeley, CA

07.08.2022 ZONING RESUBMITTAL

01.19.2023 DRC HEARING SET

01.20.2023 LOADING ZONE PLAN

05.11.2023 ZAB HEARING SET
1 -

SHATTUCK LOOKING SOUTH - BEFORE
2 -

SHATTUCK LOOKING SOUTH - AFTER
ATTACHMENT 2
ZAB 05-11-2023

PHOTO CONTEXT
VIEWS
A3.7 3
-

ASHBY LOOKING EAST - BEFORE
4 -

ASHBY LOOKING EAST - AFTER
3000

SHATTUCK

ALL DRAWINGS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL APPEARING

HEREIN CONSTITUTE ORIGINAL AND UNPUBLISHED

WORK OF THE ARCHITECT AND MAY NOT BE

DUPLICATED, USED OR DISCLOSED WITHOUT WRITTEN
CONSENT OF TRACHTENBERG ARCHITECTS.
2104 JOB:

SHEET:
2421 Fourth Street
Berkeley, California 94710
510.649.1414
www.TrachtenbergArch.com

TRACHTENBERG

ARCHITECTS

03.15.2022 ZONING APPLICATION
3000 Shattuck Ave
Berkeley, CA

07.08.2022 ZONING RESUBMITTAL

01.19.2023 DRC HEARING SET

01.20.2023 LOADING ZONE PLAN

05.11.2023 ZAB HEARING SET
1 -

ASHBY LOOKING WEST - BEFORE
2 -

ASHBY LOOKING WEST - AFTER
ATTACHMENT 2
ZAB 05-11-2023

PERSPECTIVE
VIEWS
A3.8 1
-

VIEW ALONG SHATTUCK LOOKING SOUTH WEST
3000

SHATTUCK

ALL DRAWINGS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL APPEARING

HEREIN CONSTITUTE ORIGINAL AND UNPUBLISHED

WORK OF THE ARCHITECT AND MAY NOT BE

DUPLICATED, USED OR DISCLOSED WITHOUT WRITTEN
CONSENT OF TRACHTENBERG ARCHITECTS.
2104 JOB:

SHEET:
2421 Fourth Street
Berkeley, California 94710
510.649.1414
www.TrachtenbergArch.com

TRACHTENBERG

ARCHITECTS

03.15.2022 ZONING APPLICATION
3000 Shattuck Ave
Berkeley, CA

07.08.2022 ZONING RESUBMITTAL

01.19.2023 DRC HEARING SET

01.20.2023 LOADING ZONE PLAN

05.11.2023 ZAB HEARING SET
ATTACHMENT 2
ZAB 05-11-2023

PERSPECTIVE
VIEWS
A3.9 1
-

VIEW ALONG ASHBY LOOKING SOUTH WEST
3000

SHATTUCK

ALL DRAWINGS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL APPEARING

HEREIN CONSTITUTE ORIGINAL AND UNPUBLISHED

WORK OF THE ARCHITECT AND MAY NOT BE

DUPLICATED, USED OR DISCLOSED WITHOUT WRITTEN
CONSENT OF TRACHTENBERG ARCHITECTS.
2104 JOB:

SHEET:
2421 Fourth Street
Berkeley, California 94710
510.649.1414
www.TrachtenbergArch.com

TRACHTENBERG

ARCHITECTS

03.15.2022 ZONING APPLICATION
3000 Shattuck Ave
Berkeley, CA

07.08.2022 ZONING RESUBMITTAL

01.19.2023 DRC HEARING SET

01.20.2023 LOADING ZONE PLAN

05.11.2023 ZAB HEARING SET
ATTACHMENT 2
ZAB 05-11-2023

PERSPECTIVE
VIEWS
A3.10 1
-

VIEW ALONG SHATTUCK LOOKING NORTH WEST
3000

SHATTUCK

ALL DRAWINGS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL APPEARING

HEREIN CONSTITUTE ORIGINAL AND UNPUBLISHED

WORK OF THE ARCHITECT AND MAY NOT BE

DUPLICATED, USED OR DISCLOSED WITHOUT WRITTEN
CONSENT OF TRACHTENBERG ARCHITECTS.
2104 JOB:

SHEET:
2421 Fourth Street
Berkeley, California 94710
510.649.1414
www.TrachtenbergArch.com

TRACHTENBERG

ARCHITECTS

03.15.2022 ZONING APPLICATION
3000 Shattuck Ave
Berkeley, CA

07.08.2022 ZONING RESUBMITTAL

01.19.2023 DRC HEARING SET

01.20.2023 LOADING ZONE PLAN

05.11.2023 ZAB HEARING SET
ATTACHMENT 2
ZAB 05-11-2023

PERSPECTIVE
VIEWS
A3.11 1
-

VIEW ALONG ASHBY LOOKING EAST
3000

SHATTUCK

ALL DRAWINGS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL APPEARING

HEREIN CONSTITUTE ORIGINAL AND UNPUBLISHED

WORK OF THE ARCHITECT AND MAY NOT BE

DUPLICATED, USED OR DISCLOSED WITHOUT WRITTEN
CONSENT OF TRACHTENBERG ARCHITECTS.
2104 JOB:

SHEET:
2421 Fourth Street
Berkeley, California 94710
510.649.1414
www.TrachtenbergArch.com

TRACHTENBERG

ARCHITECTS

03.15.2022 ZONING APPLICATION
3000 Shattuck Ave
Berkeley, CA

07.08.2022 ZONING RESUBMITTAL

01.19.2023 DRC HEARING SET

01.20.2023 LOADING ZONE PLAN

05.11.2023 ZAB HEARING SET
ATTACHMENT 2
ZAB 05-11-2023

PERSPECTIVE
VIEWS
A3.12 1
-

DETAIL AT SIDEWALK LEVEL
3000

SHATTUCK

ALL DRAWINGS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL APPEARING

HEREIN CONSTITUTE ORIGINAL AND UNPUBLISHED

WORK OF THE ARCHITECT AND MAY NOT BE

DUPLICATED, USED OR DISCLOSED WITHOUT WRITTEN
CONSENT OF TRACHTENBERG ARCHITECTS.
2104 JOB:

SHEET:
2421 Fourth Street
Berkeley, California 94710
510.649.1414
www.TrachtenbergArch.com

TRACHTENBERG

ARCHITECTS

03.15.2022 ZONING APPLICATION
3000 Shattuck Ave
Berkeley, CA

07.08.2022 ZONING RESUBMITTAL

01.19.2023 DRC HEARING SET

01.20.2023 LOADING ZONE PLAN

05.11.2023 ZAB HEARING SET
ATTACHMENT 2
ZAB 05-11-2023

PERSPECTIVE
VIEWS
A3.13 1
-

RETAIL ENTRY CLOSE-UP VIEW
3000

SHATTUCK

ALL DRAWINGS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL APPEARING

HEREIN CONSTITUTE ORIGINAL AND UNPUBLISHED

WORK OF THE ARCHITECT AND MAY NOT BE

DUPLICATED, USED OR DISCLOSED WITHOUT WRITTEN
CONSENT OF TRACHTENBERG ARCHITECTS.
2104 JOB:

SHEET:
2421 Fourth Street
Berkeley, California 94710
510.649.1414
www.TrachtenbergArch.com

TRACHTENBERG

ARCHITECTS

03.15.2022 ZONING APPLICATION
3000 Shattuck Ave
Berkeley, CA

07.08.2022 ZONING RESUBMITTAL

01.19.2023 DRC HEARING SET

01.20.2023 LOADING ZONE PLAN

05.11.2023 ZAB HEARING SET
ATTACHMENT 2
ZAB 05-11-2023

PERSPECTIVE
VIEWS
A3.14 1
-

DETAIL AT SIDEWALK LOOKING EAST
3000

SHATTUCK

ALL DRAWINGS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL APPEARING

HEREIN CONSTITUTE ORIGINAL AND UNPUBLISHED

WORK OF THE ARCHITECT AND MAY NOT BE

DUPLICATED, USED OR DISCLOSED WITHOUT WRITTEN
CONSENT OF TRACHTENBERG ARCHITECTS.
2104 JOB:

SHEET:
2421 Fourth Street
Berkeley, California 94710
510.649.1414
www.TrachtenbergArch.com

TRACHTENBERG

ARCHITECTS

03.15.2022 ZONING APPLICATION
3000 Shattuck Ave
Berkeley, CA

07.08.2022 ZONING RESUBMITTAL

01.19.2023 DRC HEARING SET

01.20.2023 LOADING ZONE PLAN

05.11.2023 ZAB HEARING SET
ATTACHMENT 2
ZAB 05-11-2023

PERSPECTIVE
VIEWS
A3.15 1
-

DETAIL AT SIDEWALK LOOKING NORTHWEST
3000

SHATTUCK

ALL DRAWINGS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL APPEARING

HEREIN CONSTITUTE ORIGINAL AND UNPUBLISHED

WORK OF THE ARCHITECT AND MAY NOT BE

DUPLICATED, USED OR DISCLOSED WITHOUT WRITTEN
CONSENT OF TRACHTENBERG ARCHITECTS.
2104 JOB:

SHEET:
2421 Fourth Street
Berkeley, California 94710
510.649.1414
www.TrachtenbergArch.com

TRACHTENBERG

ARCHITECTS

03.15.2022 ZONING APPLICATION
3000 Shattuck Ave
Berkeley, CA

07.08.2022 ZONING RESUBMITTAL

01.19.2023 DRC HEARING SET

01.20.2023 LOADING ZONE PLAN

05.11.2023 ZAB HEARING SET
ATTACHMENT 2
ZAB 05-11-2023

PERSPECTIVE
VIEWS
A3.16 1
-

LOBBY ENTRY CLOSE-UP VIEW
3000

SHATTUCK

ALL DRAWINGS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL APPEARING

HEREIN CONSTITUTE ORIGINAL AND UNPUBLISHED

WORK OF THE ARCHITECT AND MAY NOT BE

DUPLICATED, USED OR DISCLOSED WITHOUT WRITTEN
CONSENT OF TRACHTENBERG ARCHITECTS.
2104 JOB:

SHEET:
2421 Fourth Street
Berkeley, California 94710
510.649.1414
www.TrachtenbergArch.com

TRACHTENBERG

ARCHITECTS

03.15.2022 ZONING APPLICATION
3000 Shattuck Ave
Berkeley, CA

07.08.2022 ZONING RESUBMITTAL

01.19.2023 DRC HEARING SET

01.20.2023 LOADING ZONE PLAN

05.11.2023 ZAB HEARING SET
ATTACHMENT 2
ZAB 05-11-2023

AVG. GRADE
LEVEL 2
LEVEL 3
LEVEL 4
LEVEL 5
LEVEL 6
LEVEL 7
17'-4"
110'-4"
10'-4"10'-4"10'-4"10'-4"10'-4"10'-4" 10'-4" 10'-4"
LEVEL 8
LEVEL 9
10'-6"
T.O. ELEV. ROOF

ROOF DECK

PARAPET
3'-6"10'-4"
LEVEL 10

BUILDING
MAT
MAT
1 -

NORTH ELEVATION
3/32"=1'-0" @ 11X17 3/16" = 1'-0" @ 24X36

METAL INFILL PANELINSULATED

METAL PANELS
3000

SHATTUCK

ALL DRAWINGS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL APPEARING

HEREIN CONSTITUTE ORIGINAL AND UNPUBLISHED

WORK OF THE ARCHITECT AND MAY NOT BE

DUPLICATED, USED OR DISCLOSED WITHOUT WRITTEN
CONSENT OF TRACHTENBERG ARCHITECTS.
2104 JOB:

SHEET:
2421 Fourth Street
Berkeley, California 94710
510.649.1414
www.TrachtenbergArch.com

TRACHTENBERG

ARCHITECTS

03.15.2022 ZONING APPLICATION
3000 Shattuck Ave
Berkeley, CA

07.08.2022 ZONING RESUBMITTAL

01.19.2023 DRC HEARING SET

01.20.2023 LOADING ZONE PLAN

05.11.2023 ZAB HEARING SET

INSULATED

METAL PANELS
8 0416

DECORATIVE

METAL SCREEN

ALUMINUM

WINDOWS

INSULATED

METAL PANELS

DECORATIVE

METAL SCREEN

METAL INFILL
PANELS
ATTACHMENT 2
ZAB 05-11-2023

ROOF DECK BEYOND ELEVATORS
LOBBY

GRADE AT ASHBY SIDEWALK

SHATTUCK
AVG. GRADE
LEVEL 2
17'-4"
LEVEL 3
27'-8"
LEVEL 4
38'-0"
LEVEL 5
48'-4"
LEVEL 6
58'-8"
LEVEL 7
69'-0"
17'-4"
110'-4"
10'-4"10'-4"10'-4"10'-4"10'-4"10'-4" 10'-4" 10'-4"
LEVEL 8
79'-4"
LEVEL 10
89'-8"
110'-4"
T.O.ELEV. ROOF
124'-4"
10'-6"

ROOF DECK

CLUB ROOM
PL

GARDEN OPEN SPACE

PARAPET
3'-6"
113'-10"
2076 ASHBY

EXISTING MIXED-USE
10'-4"
LEVEL 9
100'-0"
PL PL

ALLOWABLE AWNING

PROJECTION INTO THE

RIGHT-OF-WAY PER CBC
SECTION 3202
4'-4"9'-0"
10'-1"
3000

SHATTUCK

ALL DRAWINGS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL APPEARING

HEREIN CONSTITUTE ORIGINAL AND UNPUBLISHED

WORK OF THE ARCHITECT AND MAY NOT BE

DUPLICATED, USED OR DISCLOSED WITHOUT WRITTEN
CONSENT OF TRACHTENBERG ARCHITECTS.
2104 JOB:

SHEET:
2421 Fourth Street
Berkeley, California 94710
510.649.1414
www.TrachtenbergArch.com

TRACHTENBERG

ARCHITECTS

03.15.2022 ZONING APPLICATION
3000 Shattuck Ave
Berkeley, CA

07.08.2022 ZONING RESUBMITTAL

01.19.2023 DRC HEARING SET

01.20.2023 LOADING ZONE PLAN

05.11.2023 ZAB HEARING SET

BUILDING SECTION
A4.1
1 -

E-W SECTION
1/8" = 1'-0" @ 24X36 1/16" = 1'-0" @ 11X17
ATTACHMENT 2
ZAB 05-11-2023

ASHBY
+140' +139' +138'
+142'
+141.5'
+141'

FIRE WATER

STORAGE
BIKES (36)

STORAGE /

PACKAGES
OFFICE
+141.5'
+141.5'
TRASH
FIRE

COMMAND
CENTER
2 CY
BIN
2 CY
BIN
2 CY
BIN
2 CY
BIN
96 gal
96 gal
96 gal
96 gal
96 gal
96 gal
STOR.

BIKES (20)

CLUB ROOM

MAINT /
STO.

MECH

GENERATOR
ELEC.

FIRE
PUMP

BOOSTER
PUMP

WASHER /
DRYER
SHOWER
30"x60"

WASHER /
DRYER
SHOWER
30"x60"

WASHER /
DRYER
SHOWER
30"x60"

WASHER /
DRYER
SHOWER
30"x60"
3000

SHATTUCK

ALL DRAWINGS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL APPEARING

HEREIN CONSTITUTE ORIGINAL AND UNPUBLISHED

WORK OF THE ARCHITECT AND MAY NOT BE

DUPLICATED, USED OR DISCLOSED WITHOUT WRITTEN
CONSENT OF TRACHTENBERG ARCHITECTS.
2104 JOB:

SHEET:
2421 Fourth Street
Berkeley, California 94710
510.649.1414
www.TrachtenbergArch.com

TRACHTENBERG

ARCHITECTS

03.15.2022 ZONING APPLICATION
3000 Shattuck Ave
Berkeley, CA

07.08.22 ZONING INCOMPLETE RESPONSE

CONCEPTUAL

GRADING PLAN
A5.1
1 -

GROUND LEVEL PLAN
1/8" = 1'-0" @ 24X36 1/16' = 1'-0" @ 11X17
ATTACHMENT 2
ZAB 05-11-2023

Plant List
Index Latin Name Common Name Size Spacing WELO
Trees
AM Arctostaphylos manzanita 'Dr. Hurd' Manzanita 15 gal 12'-0" o.c. VL CL Chilopsis linearis 'Burgundy' Burgundy Desert Willow (standard tree form) 36" box 20'-0" o.c. L CR Ceanothus 'Ray Hartman' Ray Hartman Ceanothus (standard tree form) 24" box 15'-0" o.c. L GB Ginkgo biloba Ginkgo 24" box as shown M
LC Lophstemon confertus Brisbane Box 24" box as shown L MC Myrica californica Pacific Wax Myrtle 15 gal as shown L Shrubs
AA Agave attenuata 'Ray of Light' Ray of Light Foxtail Agave 10 gal 4'-0" o.c. L BG Bouteloua gracilis 'Blonde Ambition' Blonde Ambition Blue Grama Grass 1 gal 30" o.c. L CS Cornus sericea, C. Stolonifera 'Hedgerow Gold'Hedgerow Gold Redtwig Dogwood 1 gal 4'-0" o.c. M DA Diplacus aurantiacus Orange Bush Monkeyflower 1 gal 2'-6" o.c. L DP Diplacus puniceus, Mimulus puniceus Red Bush Monkeyflower 1 gal 2'-6" o.c. L EC Elymus condensatus 'Canyon Prince' Canyon Prince' Blue Rye Grass 1 gal 36" o.c. L FC Festuca californica California Fescue 1 gal 4'-0" o.c. M JE Juncus effusus Soft Rush 1 gal 2'-6" o.c. H
JP Juncus patens Common Rush 1 gal 3'-6" o.c. H
MR Muhlenbergia rigens Deer Grass 1 gal 3'0" o.c. L
Groundcovers
AP Agrostis pallens West Coast Native Bunchgrass sod L
CF Calamagrostis foliosa Mendocino Reed Grass 1 gal 18" o.c. L DC Deschampsia cespitosa 'Northern Lights' Northern Lights Tufted Hairgrass 1 gal 2'-0" o.c. M HA Heuchera americana 'Green Spice' Green Spice Coral Bells 1 gal M SK Sempervivum 'Krebs 2' Krebs Desert Bloom Hens and Chicks 1 gal as shown L SR Sedum rupestre 'Angelina' Angelina Stonecrop trays as shown L ZC Epilobium canum (Zauschneria californica) California Fuschia 1 gal 2'-6" o.c. VL Rooftop Sedums
SC1 Sedum spathulifolium 'Purpureum' Red Pacific Stonecrop 1 gal L SC2 Sedum spathulifolium 'Cape Blanco' Cape Blanco Pacific Stonecrop 1 gal L SC3 Sedum divergens Pacific Stonecrop 1 gal L
Note: At least 80% of all plantings will be California natives.

EVERGREEN SCREEN
-Pittosporum 'Silver Sheen'

SHADE TREE
-Burgundy Desert Willow
ACCENT

GRASSES
-Northern Lights
-Blonde Ambition

ARCHITECTURAL ARCH

FLOWERING ACCENT
-Snowball Ceanothus

ROCK OUT-CROP, TYP

NATIVE ACCENT GRASS
-Elymus condensatus 'Canyon Prince'

A S H B Y A V E N U E

S H A T T U C K A V E N U E

PAINTED OR REFURBISHED BLDG WALL OR

OFFSET VERTICAL SURFACE SERVES AS

BACKDROP/CONTRAST TO HIGHLIGHT

PROPOSED PLANTINGS

DECOMPOSED GRANITE

GROUND PLANE
NATIVE NOOK PLANTINGS (96 SF)
 Manzanita 'Dr. Hurd'
 Hedgerow Gold Redtwig Dogwood
 Monkeyflower spp.
 Festuca californica

CONCRETE STEPPERS FLOAT

ON POOL OF WATER
ACCENT
-Monkeyflower spp.

BOARDWALK BANDS FLUSH W/ PATIO

CONCRETE BANDS
`FREESTANDING RECTANGULAR ARCH ECHOES

ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES AT ROOF DECK
- HOUSES DROP DOWN MOVIE SCREEN

GROUND PLANE TREATMENT TRAVELS
SEAMLESSLY BETW. INSIDE & OUT

CENTER LINE

ART ELEMENT CENTERED AT BLDG ENTRY & FNT ARCH
6'-0"

ADA ACCESS

GROUNDCOVER
-Agrostis pallens
ElectGenerator
Club room
Fire pump
Booster pump

CONCRETE WALK
RAMP
1401 SF PLANTING AREA

FOREGROUND ACCENT PLANTING
-Agave attenuata
146 SF PLANTING AREA

PROPOSED STREET TREE AT ASHBY AVE
-Lophostemon confertus

ROOT BARRIER AT SOUTHERN EDGE

OF TREE WELL TO PROTECT GAS LINE

FLEXI-PAVE FILLS
TREE WELLS, TYP.

CONTINUE (E) STREET

TREE PATTERN NORTH

OF ASHBY AVE (OFFSITE)
-Ginkgo biloba

ACCENT PAVING AT
ENTRY

PLANTER AT BASE OF BLDG

CUT-OUT IN

PAVING FOR

PLANTING

ACCESS RAMPS

AND SIDEWALK PER

CITY OF BERKELEY
(METALLIC GRAY

COLORED RAMPS)

GROUND LEVEL

LANDSCAPE PLAN
L1.0
North 0 4 8 16NOTE: All street trees shown are new (there are no existing street trees on-site). 01 MAY 23

05.01.2023 RESPONSE TO DESIGN REVIEW
ATTACHMENT 2
ZAB 05-11-2023

VIEW TO EAST

BAY HILLS

VIEWS TO SF BAY
& MOUNT TAM

OUTDOOR

KITCHEN

ISLAND SEATING

OUTDOOR
DINING

SPECIMEN TREE IN

RAISED SEATWALL PLANTER
- Burgundy Desert Willow

BOARDWALK CONNECTS
SPACES

ALTERNATING SEDUM MASSINGS W/

ROCK OUT-CROPS ECHOES JAPANESE

ZEN GARDEN

COUNTERTOP SEATING

TEMPERED GLASS RAILING

OVERHEAD TRELLIS
·BISTRO LIGHTS
·OVERHEAD HEATERS

COUNTERTOP

SEATING

SEATING
& FIRE PIT

PEDESTAL
PAVERS

RAISED PLANTER

W/ ACCENT TREE
-Dr. Hurd Manzanita
-Mendocino Reed Grass
PLANTINGS @ RAISED PLANTER (66 SF)
·FLOWERING TREE, Ray Hartman Ceanothus
·NATIVE GRASS, Blonde Ambition

PLANTING AREA
-Sedum spath. 'Purpureum'

PLANTING AREA
-Sedum spath. 'Cape Blanco'
-Sedum divergens

SEDUM CARPET
ROOF DECK TOTAL AREA = 4,488 SF
ROOF DECK PLANTING AREA = 1,830 SF
ROOF DECK LANDSCAPE % = 40%
GROUND LEVEL TOTAL AREA = 3,391 SF
GROUND LEVEL PLANTING AREA = 1,356 SF
GROUND LEVEL LANDSCAPE % = 40%
3000

SHATTUCK

ALL DRAWINGS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL APPEARING

HEREIN CONSTITUTE ORIGINAL AND UNPUBLISHED

WORK OF THE ARCHITECT AND MAY NOT BE

DUPLICATED, USED OR DISCLOSED WITHOUT WRITTEN
CONSENT OF TRACHTENBERG ARCHITECTS.
2104 JOB:

SHEET:
2421 Fourth Street
Berkeley, California 94710
510.649.1414
www.TrachtenbergArch.com

TRACHTENBERG

ARCHITECTS

03.09.2021 REVISED BASE PLANS
3000 Shattuck Ave
Berkeley, CA

OUT INSIDEO
landscape architecture
6000 Harwood Ave
Oakland CA 94618
www.aboutinsideout.com

07.08.2022 ZONING INCOMPLETE RESPONSE

01.06.2023 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMITTAL
F O R A G E N C Y R E V I E W O N L Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N

05.01.2023 RESPONSE TO DESIGN REVIEW

ROOF DECK

GROUND LEVEL
L1.1
North0 2 4 8
ATTACHMENT 2
ZAB 05-11-2023

z
0 l­
o
:::J
O'.'.
1-­
(j)
z
0 u
O'.'.

TRACHTENBERG

ARCHITECTS
2421 Fourth Street
Berkeley, California 94710
S 10,649.1414
www.TrachtenbergArch.com
INSIDECt UT
landscape architecture
6000 Harwood Ave
Oakland CA 94618
www.aboutinsideout.com
3000
o SHATTUCK
LL
l­
o
z
>­
_J
z
0 w
>
w
O'.'.
>­
u
z
w
('J
<(
O'.'.
0 LL
3000 Shattuck Ave
Berkeley, CA

03.09.2021 REVISED BASE PLANS

07.08.2022 ZONING INCOMPLETE RESPONSE

01.06.2023 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMITTAL

ALL DRAWINGS AND WRITTEN ,IATERIAL APPEARING

HEREIN CONSTITUTE ORIGINAL AND UNPUBLISHED

WORK OF THE ARCHITECT AND MAY NOT BE
DUPLICATED. USED OR DISCLOSED WITHOUT WRITTEN

CONSENT OF TRACHTENBERG ARCHITECTS
JOB 2104
SHEET

LANDSCAPE

IMAGERY
L2.0

05.01.2023 RESPONSE TO DESIGN REVIEW
ATTACHMENT 2
ZAB 05-11-2023

2 CY
BIN
2 CY
BIN
2 CY
BIN
2 CY
BIN
96 gal
96 gal
96 gal
96 gal
96 gal
96 gal

CUCUCUCUCUCUCUCU

CU CU CU CU CU CU CU CU CU

CU CU CU
CUCUCU
P
MV
FS
CU

CON CON CON CON
PRV
3000

SHATTUCK

ALL DRAWINGS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL APPEARING

HEREIN CONSTITUTE ORIGINAL AND UNPUBLISHED

WORK OF THE ARCHITECT AND MAY NOT BE

DUPLICATED, USED OR DISCLOSED WITHOUT WRITTEN
CONSENT OF TRACHTENBERG ARCHITECTS.
2104 JOB:

SHEET:
2421 Fourth Street
Berkeley, California 94710
510.649.1414
www.TrachtenbergArch.com

TRACHTENBERG

ARCHITECTS

03.09.2021 REVISED BASE PLANS
3000 Shattuck Ave
Berkeley, CA
landscape architecture
6000 Harwood Ave
Oakland CA 94618
www.aboutinsideout.com

07.08.2022 ZONING INCOMPLETE RESPONSE

GROUND LEVEL

IRRIGATION PLAN
I1.0
North0 4 8 16
fax 925.932.5671 tel 925.939.3985
www.rmairrigation.com
2760 Camino Diablo
Walnut Creek, CA 94597

Russell D. Mitchell Associates, Inc.

Irrigation Consultant:
1" WATER METER FOR IRRIGATION TO BE PROVIDED BY UTILITY EBMUD. MAXIMUM IRRIGATION DEMAND: ( )GPM AT ( )PSI STATIC PRESSURE AT WATER METER LOCATION.

1.25" ELECTRICAL CONDUIT AND SPLICE BOX FOR 2-WIRE CABLE

TO BE PROVIDED AND INSTALLED FROM IRRIGATION CONTROLLER "C" TO THIS LOCATION UNDER ELECTRICAL CONTRACT WORK BY A LICENSED ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR. COORDINATE INSTALLATION

OF CONDUIT WITH GENERAL/ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR(S) PRIOR
TO CONSTRUCTION.
1 PLAN NOTES LEGEND
APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF BOOSTER PUMP BY OTHERS. PRESSURE ON DISCHARGE SIDE OF BOOSTER PUMP SHALL BE 95 PSI.
3 INSTALL A 1" IRRIGATION BACKFLOW PREVENTER AT THIS
APPROXIMATE LOCATION.
2 IRRIGATION MASTER VALVE AND FLOW SENSOR.
5 4IRRIGATION CONTROLLER "C". MOUNT ON INTERIOR WALL AT THIS LOCATION AS DETAILED AND AS DIRECTED BY ARCHITECT.

CONNECT TO 120 VOLT A.C. ELECTRICAL SERVICE INSTALLED AT THIS LOCATION UNDER ELECTRICAL CONTRACT. IRRIGATION

CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE LOCATION OF ELECTRICAL
SERVICE PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.

1.25" COPPER PIPE STUB-OUT FOR IRRIGATION FROM MECHANICAL

ROOM TO THIS APPROXIMATE LOCATION TO SERVICE ROOF LEVEL

PLANTERS TO BE PROVIDED AND INSTALLED IN-STRUCTURE UNDER PLUMBING CONTRACT. COORDINATE INSTALLATION OF PIPE WITH GENERAL/PLUMBING CONTRACTOR(S) PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.
9 10

71.25" COPPER PIPE STUB-OUT FOR IRRIGATION FROM MECHANICAL

ROOM TO THIS APPROXIMATE LOCATION TO SERVICE SITE LEVEL

PLANTERS TO BE PROVIDED AND INSTALLED IN-STRUCTURE UNDER PLUMBING CONTRACT. COORDINATE INSTALLATION OF PIPE WITH GENERAL/PLUMBING CONTRACTOR(S) PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.

81.25" ELECTRICAL CONDUIT AND SPLICE BOX FOR 2-WIRE CABLE

TO BE PROVIDED AND INSTALLED FROM IRRIGATION CONTROLLER "C" TO THIS LOCATION UNDER ELECTRICAL CONTRACT WORK BY A LICENSED ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR. COORDINATE INSTALLATION

OF CONDUIT WITH GENERAL/ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR(S) PRIOR
TO CONSTRUCTION.

INSTALL A 1" PRESSURE REDUCING VALVE FOR MAIN SERVICING SITE LEVEL. SET PRESSURE TO BE 50 PSI.
6 1 2
3 4
5 9
10 6
78 NOTES:

1. ONE BUBBLER SYMBOL IS SHOWN AT TREES FOR GRAPHIC CLARITY ONLY.

INSTALL MINIMUM TWO BUBBLERS AT EACH TREE. INSTALL REQUIRED NUMBER OF BUBBLERS AS DETAILED.

2. IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT MAY BE SHOWN WITHIN HARDSCAPE FOR GRAPHIC CLARITY ONLY. INSTALL ALL IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT WITHIN PLANTED AREAS.

IRRIGATION PIPE AND WIRE CROSSING BENEATH HARDSCAPE SURFACES SHALL BE CONTAINED WITHIN SLEEVING OR SCHEDULE 40 PVC CONDUIT. SLEEVING

SIZE SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF TWO TIMES THE AGGREGATE DIAMETER OF ALL PIPES CONTAINED WITH SLEEVE. PROVIDE VERTICAL SWEEP FOR ALL

ELECTRICAL CONDUIT ON EACH SIDE OF HARDSCAPE AND TERMINATE ENDS AT 12" MINIMUM DEPTH AND 12" FROM HARDSCAPE SURFACE.

3. UNSIZED LATERAL LINE PIPING LOCATED DOWN STREAM OF 1" PIPING SHALL BE 3/4" IN SIZE (TYPICAL).

4. SIZING OF LATERAL PIPE SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS:

0.75" 0-6 GPM
1"7-12 GPM

5. SIZING OF LATERAL PIPE FOR DRIPLINE (12" O.C. GRID WITH 0.6 GPH OR LESS EMITTERS) SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS:

0.75 0-500 FT
1"501-1100 FT

01.06.2023 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMITTAL

05.01.2023 RESPONSE TO DESIGN REVIEW
ATTACHMENT 2
ZAB 05-11-2023

CU
CON
3000

SHATTUCK

ALL DRAWINGS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL APPEARING

HEREIN CONSTITUTE ORIGINAL AND UNPUBLISHED

WORK OF THE ARCHITECT AND MAY NOT BE

DUPLICATED, USED OR DISCLOSED WITHOUT WRITTEN
CONSENT OF TRACHTENBERG ARCHITECTS.
2104 JOB:

SHEET:
2421 Fourth Street
Berkeley, California 94710
510.649.1414
www.TrachtenbergArch.com

TRACHTENBERG

ARCHITECTS

03.09.2021 REVISED BASE PLANS
3000 Shattuck Ave
Berkeley, CA
landscape architecture
6000 Harwood Ave
Oakland CA 94618
www.aboutinsideout.com

07.08.2022 ZONING INCOMPLETE RESPONSE

ROOF DECK

IRRIGATION PLAN
I1.1
North0 2 4 8

1.25" ELECTRICAL CONDUIT AND SPLICE BOX FOR 2-WIRE CABLE

TO BE PROVIDED AND INSTALLED FROM IRRIGATION CONTROLLER "C" TO THIS LOCATION UNDER ELECTRICAL CONTRACT WORK BY A LICENSED ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR. COORDINATE INSTALLATION

OF CONDUIT WITH GENERAL/ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR(S) PRIOR
TO CONSTRUCTION.

1.25" COPPER PIPE STUB-OUT FOR IRRIGATION FROM MECHANICAL

ROOM TO THIS APPROXIMATE LOCATION TO SERVICE ROOF LEVEL

PLANTERS TO BE PROVIDED AND INSTALLED IN-STRUCTURE UNDER PLUMBING CONTRACT. COORDINATE INSTALLATION OF PIPE WITH GENERAL/PLUMBING CONTRACTOR(S) PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.
1 2
1 NOTES:

1. ONE BUBBLER SYMBOL IS SHOWN AT TREES FOR GRAPHIC CLARITY ONLY.

INSTALL MINIMUM TWO BUBBLERS AT EACH TREE. INSTALL REQUIRED NUMBER OF BUBBLERS AS DETAILED.

2. IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT MAY BE SHOWN WITHIN HARDSCAPE FOR GRAPHIC CLARITY ONLY. INSTALL ALL IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT WITHIN PLANTED AREAS.

IRRIGATION PIPE AND WIRE CROSSING BENEATH HARDSCAPE SURFACES SHALL BE CONTAINED WITHIN SLEEVING OR SCHEDULE 40 PVC CONDUIT. SLEEVING

SIZE SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF TWO TIMES THE AGGREGATE DIAMETER OF ALL PIPES CONTAINED WITH SLEEVE. PROVIDE VERTICAL SWEEP FOR ALL

ELECTRICAL CONDUIT ON EACH SIDE OF HARDSCAPE AND TERMINATE ENDS AT 12" MINIMUM DEPTH AND 12" FROM HARDSCAPE SURFACE.

3. UNSIZED LATERAL LINE PIPING LOCATED DOWN STREAM OF 1" PIPING SHALL BE 3/4" IN SIZE (TYPICAL).

4. SIZING OF LATERAL PIPE SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS:

0.75" 0-6 GPM
1"7-12 GPM

5. SIZING OF LATERAL PIPE FOR DRIPLINE (12" O.C. GRID WITH 0.6 GPH OR LESS EMITTERS) SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS:

0.75 0-500 FT
1"501-1100 FT

PLAN NOTES LEGEND
2 fax 925.932.5671 tel 925.939.3985
www.rmairrigation.com
2760 Camino Diablo
Walnut Creek, CA 94597

Russell D. Mitchell Associates, Inc.

Irrigation Consultant:

01.06.2023 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMITTAL

05.01.2023 RESPONSE TO DESIGN REVIEW
ATTACHMENT 2
ZAB 05-11-2023

3000

SHATTUCK

ALL DRAWINGS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL APPEARING

HEREIN CONSTITUTE ORIGINAL AND UNPUBLISHED

WORK OF THE ARCHITECT AND MAY NOT BE

DUPLICATED, USED OR DISCLOSED WITHOUT WRITTEN
CONSENT OF TRACHTENBERG ARCHITECTS.
2104 JOB:

SHEET:
2421 Fourth Street
Berkeley, California 94710
510.649.1414
www.TrachtenbergArch.com

TRACHTENBERG

ARCHITECTS

03.09.2021 REVISED BASE PLANS
3000 Shattuck Ave
Berkeley, CA
landscape architecture
6000 Harwood Ave
Oakland CA 94618
www.aboutinsideout.com

07.08.2022 ZONING INCOMPLETE RESPONSE

IRRIGATION

NOTES AND LEGEND
I1.2

IRRIGATION COORDINATION NOTES

1. COPPER PIPING WITHIN STRUCTURE SHALL BE PROVIDED, ROUTED, AND INSTALLED BY PLUMBING CONTRACTOR. EXIT OF PIPE TO
PLANTER SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 6" BELOW FINISH GRADE.

2. IRRIGATION SLEEVING AND/OR CONDUIT IN STRUCTURE TO BE PROVIDED AND INSTALLED UNDER STRUCTURAL WORK.

3. ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE CONDUIT, PULL BOXES AND WIRE IN STRUCTURE. THE DRAWINGS INDICATE REQUIRED

WIRE QUANTITIES FROM A GIVEN PLANTER LOCATION, THROUGH
STRUCTURE, TO THE CONTROLLER LOCATION. 14 GAUGE WIRE
SHALL BE USED FOR CONTROL WIRING AND 12 GAUGE FOR
COMMON GROUND. FINAL CONNECTION OR WIRING TO REMOTE

CONTROL VALVES AND CONTROLLER SHALL BE COMPLETED BY
IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR.
fax 925.932.5671 tel 925.939.3985
www.rmairrigation.com
2760 Camino Diablo
Walnut Creek, CA 94597

Russell D. Mitchell Associates, Inc.

Irrigation Consultant:

IRRIGATION NOTES
HUNTER REMOTE CONTROL VALVE WITH 40 PSI PRESSURE REGULATOR PCB-25
SCHEDULE 40 PVC PLASTIC PIPE. COVER TO BE AS

INDICATED IN SPECIFICATIONS OR AS INDICATED
ABOVE FOR PIPE DEPTH OF COVER.
3/4" AND LARGER:
1120-SCHEDULE 40 PVC PLASTIC PIPE WITH
SCHEDULE 40 PVC SOLVENT WELD FITTINGS.
12" COVER.

LATERAL LINE:

SLEEVING:
975XL2SEU-1"WILKINS REDUCED PRESSURE BACKFLOW ASSEMBL.

1.25" THROUGHOUT:
1120-SCHEDULE 40 PVC PLASTIC PIPE WITH
SCHEDULE 40 PVC SOLVENT WELD FITTINGS.
18" COVER.

MAIN LINE:

ICV-101/AS-40
ICZ-101-40HUNTER REMOTE CONTROL VALVE WITH A 40 PSI PRESSURE REGULATOR AND A 1" FILTER.

CONTROLLER AND STATION NUMBER
AREA (SQ. FT.)

FLOW (GPM)

REMOTE CONTROL VALVE SIZE (IN INCHES)

ASSOCIATED REMOTE CONTROL VALVE

WATER USE CLASSIFICATION OF ZONE
APPLICATION RATE (IN/HR) or DRIPLINE SPACING
or
CONCONELECTRICALCONDUIT:

SHOWN FOR REFERENCE ONLY, SEE ELECTRICAL PLANS FOR
ROUTING THROUGH STRUCTURE.

CUCUCU1.25" THROUGHOUT:

TYPE 'K' COPPER PIPE WITH WROUGHT FITTINGS. SHOWN

FOR REFERENCE ONLY, SEE PLUMBING PLANS FOR
ROUTING THROUGH STRUCTURE.

MAIN LINE:

T-FP600A-LF-1"NIBCO 1" BRASS BALL VALVE

ECO-IDHUNTER ECO-INDICATOR
3/4" AND LARGER:
1120-SCHEDULE 40 PVC PLASTIC PIPE WITH
SCHEDULE 40 PVC SOLVENT WELD FITTINGS.
12" COVER.

DRIPLINE
LATERAL LINE:

WT-WRSWIRELESS RAIN SENSOR SYSTEM. AUTOMATICALLY SHUTS THE SYSTEM OFF AS SOON AS IT STARTS RAINING.

DRIP ZONE:

DRIPLINE REMOTE CONTROL VALVE

HUNTER HDL SERIES DRIPLINE WITH BUILT IN PRESSURE COMPENSATION AND CHECK VALVE, PART #HDL-06-12-250-CV. USE PLD FITTINGS.

TUBING TO BE INSTALLED 4" BELOW GRADE IN A 12" O.C. GRID ACCORDING TO DETAILS. SIZE EXHAUST HEADERS AS FOLLOWS: 1": 0-10 GPM, 1.25": 11-20 GPM. ALL EXHAUST HEADERS SHALL BE 1" SCH 40 PVC OR 1" SCH 40 FLEXIBLE PVC. USE SCH. 40 PVC SOLVENT WELD FITTINGS.

EXTEND PVC HEADERS TO THE ENDS OF ALL DRIP ZONES TO BALANCE FLOW IF REQUIRED. SEE DETAILS FOR FURTHER INFORMATION.

APPROXIMATE CONNECTION POINT BETWEEN DRIPLINE

TUBING AND PVC SUPPLY WHEN DRIP ZONE IS LESS
THAN 3 GPM AND NO PVC SUPPLY/EXHUST HEADERS
ARE NEEDED. REFER TO DRIPLINE TUBING CONNECTION
DETAIL FOR MORE INFORMATION.

DRIPLINE REMOTE CONTROL VALVE
44-LRCRAIN BIRD 1" TWO-PIECE QUICK COUPLING VALVE (YELLOW LOCKING

RUBBER COVER)
WT-MV-100G-SNOMVWeatherTRAK 1" BRASS MASTER VALVE (NORMALLY OPEN) WLT-0500-TNDS SCH 40 BALL VALVE OR APPROVED EQUAL

HUNTER BUBBLER (TREE)
MIN. 2 PER TREE. REFER TO

BUBBLER DETAIL FOR

QUANTITY OF BUBBLERS
PER TREE SIZE.

0.25TRICKLE 30
QB44RCAR10BUCKNER 1" TWO-PIECE QUICK COUPLING VALVE (ANTI-ROTATION)

PVC LATERAL
SUPPLY
HEADER

EXHAUST
HEADER

DRIP ZONE

EXTENTS

PVC LATERAL
XX
STATION #

COLOR HATCH

OF ZONE
XX
STATION #

DRIP ZONE

EXTENTS

COLOR HATCH

OF ZONE

IRRIGATION LEGEND
SYMBOL

OPERATING

PSI DESCRIPTION
NOZZLE
GPM

OPERATING

RADIUS (FEET) MODEL NUMBER
WeatherTRAK 1" FLOW SENSORWTFLOW-HD-P-100FS
WTPRO3-C-H2048-SWM WeatherTRAK ET PRO3 2-WIRE 48 STATION CONTROLLER IN A STAINLESS STEEL WALL MOUNTED ENCLOSURE.

WT2W-H2O-1VDWEATHERTRAK DECODER (1 PER VALVE)
WT2W-H20-SAWEATHERTRAK SURGE ARRESTOR (1 EVERY 500 FEET ALONG MAIN) REFER TO DETAILS FOR INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS.

ROUTE TWO WIRE CABLE TO ALL REMOTE CONTROL VALVES. SIZE #14AWG WIRE WITH A JACKETED 2-CONDUCTOR. PREFERRED WIRE MAKE AND MODEL IS PAIGE ELECTRIC WIRE P7072D. ALL SPLICING SHALL BE MADE WITH 3-M DBR/Y-6 WATERPROOF SPLICE KITS OR APPROVED EQUAL. INSTALL 2 WIRE CABLE WITHIN 1.25" SCH 40 ELECTRICAL CONDUIT. PULL BOXES SHALL BE LOCATED EVERY 200' NO SPLICES ARE ALLOWED BETWEEN VALVES. REFER TO DETAIL FOR INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS.

NOT SHOWN ON
PLANS
WT2W-H2O-FSWEATHERTRAK FLOW SENSOR DECODER
CIMXL-5YA5 YEAR EXTENSION OF WeatherTRAK Central.

WT2W-H2O-2VDWEATHERTRAK DECODER - TWO STATION
WT2W-H2O-MVWEATHERTRAK MASTER VALVE DECODER
WT2W-H2O-PSWEATHERTRAK PUMP START DECODER

1. THESE IRRIGATION DRAWINGS ARE DIAGRAMMATIC AND
INDICATIVE OF THE WORK TO BE INSTALLED. ALL PIPING, VALVES,

AND OTHER IRRIGATION COMPONENTS MAY BE SHOWN WITHIN

PAVED AREAS FOR GRAPHIC CLARITY ONLY AND ARE TO BE
INSTALLED WITHIN PLANTING AREAS. DUE TO THE SCALE OF THE

DRAWINGS, IT IS NOT POSSIBLE TO INDICATE ALL OFFSETS,

FITTINGS, SLEEVES, CONDUIT, AND OTHER ITEMS WHICH MAY BE REQUIRED. INVESTIGATE THE STRUCTURAL AND FINISHED

CONDITION AFFECTING THE CONTRACT WORK INCLUDING

OBSTRUCTIONS, GRADE DIFFERENCES OR AREA DIMENSIONAL
DIFFERENCES. IN THE EVENT OF FIELD DISCREPANCY WITH

CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, PLAN THE INSTALLATION WORK

ACCORDINGLY BY NOTIFICATION AND APPROVAL OF THE

OWNER'S AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE AND ACCORDING TO THE
CONTRACT SPECIFICATIONS. NOTIFY AND COORDINATE

IRRIGATION CONTRACT WORK WITH APPLICABLE CONTRACTORS

FOR THE LOCATION AND INSTALLATION OF PIPE, CONDUIT OR

SLEEVES THROUGH OR UNDER WALLS, ROADWAYS, PAVING AND
STRUCTURES BEFORE CONSTRUCTION. IN THE EVENT THESE

NOTIFICATIONS ARE NOT PERFORMED, THE CONTRACTOR
ASSUMES FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR REQUIRED REVISIONS.

2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODES, STANDARDS, AND REGULATIONS. ALL WORK AND MATERIALS

SHALL BE IN FULL ACCORDANCE WITH THE LATEST RULES AND
REGULATIONS OF THE NATIONAL ELECTRIC CODE; THE UNIFORM

PLUMBING CODE, PUBLISHED BY THE WESTERN PLUMBING
OFFICIALS ASSOCIATION; AND OTHER STATE OR LOCAL LAWS OR REGULATIONS. NOTHING IN THESE DRAWINGS IS TO BE

CONSTRUED TO PERMIT WORK NOT CONFORMING TO THESE
CODES OR REGULATIONS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH

WITHOUT ANY EXTRA CHARGE, ANY ADDITIONAL MATERIAL AND

LABOR WHEN REQUIRED BY THE COMPLIANCE WITH THESE CODES
AND REGULATIONS.

3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE INSTALLATION OF

IRRIGATION SYSTEM WITH LAYOUT AND INSTALLATION OF THE

PLANT MATERIALS TO INSURE THAT THERE WILL BE COMPLETE AND

UNIFORM IRRIGATION COVERAGE OF PLANTING IN ACCORDANCE
WITH THESE DRAWINGS, AND CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. THE

IRRIGATION LAYOUT SHALL BE CHECKED BY THE CONTRACTOR

AND OWNER'S AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO

CONSTRUCTION TO DETERMINE IF ANY CHANGES, DELETIONS, OR ADDITIONS ARE REQUIRED. IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL BE

INSTALLED AND TESTED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF PLANT
MATERIAL.

4. THE INTENT OF THIS IRRIGATION SYSTEM IS TO PROVIDE THE

MINIMUM AMOUNT OF WATER REQUIRED TO SUSTAIN GOOD
PLANT HEALTH.

5. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE MAINTENANCE CONTRACTOR

AND/OR OWNER TO PROGRAM THE IRRIGATION CONTROLLER(S)

TO PROVIDE THE MINIMUM AMOUNT OF WATER NEEDED TO
SUSTAIN GOOD PLANT HEALTH. THIS INCLUDES MAKING

ADJUSTMENTS TO THE PROGRAM FOR SEASONAL WEATHER

CHANGES, PLANT MATERIAL, WATER REQUIREMENTS, MOUNDS,
SLOPES, SUN, SHADE AND WIND EXPOSURE.

6. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF A LICENSED ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE 120 VOLT A.C. (2.5 AMP DEMAND PER CONTROLLER) ELECTRICAL SERVICE TO THE CONTROLLER LOCATION(S). IT IS THE

RESPONSIBILITY OF THE IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR TO

COORDINATE THE ELECTRICAL SERVICE STUB-OUT TO THE
CONTROLLER(S). PROVIDE PROPER GROUNDING PER CONTROLLER

MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH
LOCAL CODES.

7. INSTALL NEW BATTERIES IN THE IRRIGATION CONTROLLER(S) TO

RETAIN PROGRAM IN MEMORY DURING TEMPORARY POWER
FAILURES. USE QUANTITY, TYPE AND SIZE REQUIRED AS PER
CONTROLLER MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS.

8. SCHEDULE A MEETING WHICH INCLUDES REPRESENTATIVES OF THE

IRRIGATION CONTROLLER MANUFACTURER, THE MAINTENANCE

CONTRACTOR, THE OWNER AND THE IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR

AT THE SITE FOR INSTRUCTION ON THE PROPER PROGRAMMING
AND OPERATION OF THE IRRIGATION CONTROLLER.

9. INSTALL 2-WIRE CABLE ALONG THE MAIN LINE. CONTACT

CONTROLLER REPRESENTATIVE FOR A PRE-CONSTRUCTION
MEETING.

10. INSTALL 2-WIRE CABLE WITHIN 1.25" CONDUIT WITH LONG SWEEPS IN AND OUT OF EACH VALVE BOX. SEAL ALL CONDUIT
OPENINGS WITH WATERPROOF FOAM.

11. INSTALL A 14"X19" GREY ELECTRICAL PULL BOX EVERY 200' AND AT EVERY CHANGE IN DIRECTION. ONLY SPLICE TWO WIRE CABLE AT THREE WAY WIRE CONNECTIONS.

12. IRRIGATION CONTROL WIRES: SOLID COPPER WITH U.L. APPROVAL FOR DIRECT BURIAL IN GROUND. SIZE #14AWG WIRE WITH A
JACKETED 2-CONDUCTOR. PREFERRED WIRE MAKE AND MODEL IS
THE PAIGE IRRIGATION WIRE, SPEC P7072D. ALL SPLICING SHALL BE MADE WITH 3-M DBR/Y-6 WATERPROOF SPLICE KIT.

13. DECODER GROUNDING SHALL BE PROVIDED EVERY 600 FEET, AT

THE CONTROLLER AND AT THE LAST DECODER OR AT THE END OF THE 2 WIRE PATH. GROUND WITH A 5/8" X 8' COPPER CLAD
GROUNDING ROD. #6 COPPER WIRE TO SURGE DEVICE/DECODER.

INCLUDE A SURGE ARRESTOR AT EACH GROUNDING LOCATION. A

SPLIT BOLT CONNECTION TO BE USED TO CONNECT THE SURGE
DEVICE TO THE GROUND WIRE WITH A DBR/Y-6 WATERPROOF
CONNECTOR.

14. SPLICING OF JACKETED 2-WIRE IS PERMITTED IN VALVE BOXES ONLY. LEAVE A 24" LONG COIL OF WIRE AT EACH SPLICE AND A 24" LONG EXPANSION LOOP IN ALL PULL BOXES.

15. INSTALL BLACK PLASTIC VALVE BOXES WITH BOLT DOWN, NON HINGED COVER MARKED "IRRIGATION CONTROL VALVE". BOX
BODY SHALL HAVE KNOCK OUTS. ACCEPTABLE VALVE BOX
MANUFACTURER'S INCLUDE NDS, CARSON OR APPROVED EQUAL.

16. INSTALL REMOTE CONTROL VALVE BOXES 12" FROM WALK, CURB, BUILDING OR LANDSCAPE FEATURE. AT MULTIPLE VALVE BOX

GROUPS, INSTALL EACH BOX AN EQUAL DISTANCE FROM THE
WALK, CURB, BUILDING OR LANDSCAPE FEATURE AND PROVIDE 12" BETWEEN BOX TOPS. ALIGN THE SHORT SIDE OF RECTANGULAR

VALVE BOXES PARALLEL TO WALK, CURB, BUILDING OR LANDSCAPE FEATURE.

17. VALVE LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE DIAGRAMMATIC. INSTALL IN
GROUND COVER/SHRUB AREAS.

18. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL LABEL CONTROL LINE WIRE AT EACH REMOTE CONTROL VALVE WITH A 2 1/4" X 2 3/4" POLYURETHANE I.D. TAG, INDICATING IDENTIFICATION NUMBER OF VALVE
(CONTROLLER AND STATION NUMBER). ATTACH LABEL TO
CONTROL WIRE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PERMANENTLY STAMP

ALL VALVE BOX LIDS WITH APPROPRIATE IDENTIFICATION AS
NOTED IN CONSTRUCTION DETAILS.

19. FLUSH AND ADJUST IRRIGATION OUTLETS AND NOZZLES FOR

OPTIMUM PERFORMANCE AND TO PREVENT OVER SPRAY ONTO
WALKS, ROADWAYS, AND/OR BUILDINGS. SELECT THE BEST

DEGREE OF THE ARC AND RADIUS TO FIT THE EXISTING SITE

CONDITIONS AND THROTTLE THE FLOW CONTROL AT EACH VALVE

TO OBTAIN THE OPTIMUM OPERATING PRESSURE FOR EACH
CONTROL ZONE.

20. LOCATE BUBBLERS ON UPHILL SIDE OF PLANT OR TREE.

21. INSTALL A HUNTER HCV SERIES, KBI CV SERIES, OR APPROVED

EQUAL SPRING LOADED CHECK VALVE IN SPRINKLER RISER

ASSEMBLIES WHERE LOW OUTLET DRAINAGE WILL CAUSE EROSION AND/OR EXCESS WATER.

22. WHERE IT IS NECESSARY TO EXCAVATE ADJACENT TO EXISTING

TREES, USE CAUTION TO AVOID INJURY TO TREES AND TREE
ROOTS. EXCAVATE BY HAND IN AREAS WHERE TWO (2) INCH AND LARGER ROOTS OCCUR. BACK FILL TRENCHES ADJACENT TO TREE WITHIN TWENTY-FOUR (24) HOURS. WHERE THIS IS NOT POSSIBLE,

SHADE THE SIDE OF THE TRENCH ADJACENT TO THE TREE WITH WET BURLAP OR CANVAS.

23. NOTIFY LOCAL JURISDICTIONS FOR INSPECTION AND TESTING OF INSTALLED BACKFLOW PREVENTION DEVICE.

24. THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM DESIGN IS BASED ON THE MINIMUM OPERATING PRESSURE SHOWN ON THE IRRIGATION DRAWINGS.

VERIFY WATER PRESSURE PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. REPORT ANY

DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE WATER PRESSURE INDICATED ON THE

DRAWINGS AND THE ACTUAL PRESSURE READING AT THE

IRRIGATION POINT OF CONNECTION TO THE OWNER'S
AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE.

25. IRRIGATION DEMAND: REFER TO PLANS.

26. PIPE SIZING SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS IS TYPICAL. AS CHANGES

IN LAYOUT OCCUR DURING STAKING AND CONSTRUCTION THE
SIZE MAY NEED TO BE ADJUSTED ACCORDINGLY.

27. PIPE THREAD SEALANT COMPOUND SHALL BE RECTOR SEAL #5.

28. THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MINOR

CHANGES IN THE IRRIGATION LAYOUT DUE TO OBSTRUCTIONS

NOT SHOWN ON THE IRRIGATION DRAWINGS SUCH AS LIGHTS,
FIRE HYDRANTS, SIGNS, ELECTRICAL ENCLOSURES, ETC.

29. WHEN WORK OF THIS SECTION HAS BEEN COMPLETED AND SUCH

OTHER TIMES AS MAY BE DIRECTED, REMOVE ALL TRASH, DEBRIS, SURPLUS MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT FROM SITE.

30. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SUPPLEMENTAL HAND

WATERING OF ALL PLANT MATERIAL WITHIN DRIPLINE AREAS UNTIL THE PLANTS ARE SUFFICIENTLY ESTABLISHED.

31. VERIFY LOCATIONS OF ALL IRRIGATION COMPONENTS INSTALLED

WITHIN A VALVE BOX WITH LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO
INSTALLATION. DO NOT INSTALL UNTIL LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
PROVIDES ACCEPTABLE LOCATIONS.

PCB-250.25 HUNTER BUBBLER
(SHRUB)
30 TRICKLE
WILKINS PRESSURE REDUCING VALVE500XLHLR PRV

01.06.2023 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMITTAL

05.01.2023 RESPONSE TO DESIGN REVIEW
ATTACHMENT 2
ZAB 05-11-2023

3000

SHATTUCK

ALL DRAWINGS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL APPEARING

HEREIN CONSTITUTE ORIGINAL AND UNPUBLISHED

WORK OF THE ARCHITECT AND MAY NOT BE

DUPLICATED, USED OR DISCLOSED WITHOUT WRITTEN
CONSENT OF TRACHTENBERG ARCHITECTS.
2104 JOB:

SHEET:
2421 Fourth Street
Berkeley, California 94710
510.649.1414
www.TrachtenbergArch.com

TRACHTENBERG

ARCHITECTS

03.09.2021 REVISED BASE PLANS
3000 Shattuck Ave
Berkeley, CA
landscape architecture
6000 Harwood Ave
Oakland CA 94618
www.aboutinsideout.com

07.08.2022 ZONING INCOMPLETE RESPONSE

IRRIGATION
DETAIL
I1.3
1 2
3 1
NOTE:
4 2
4 3
MAXIMUM LINE OF SIGHT FROM RAIN SENSOR TO RECEIVER IS 300 FT. DISTANCE IS LESS IF OBSTRUCTIONS EXIST. SENSOR MUST BE INSTALLED IN "CLEAR SPACE" WHERE IT IS EXPOSED TO
UNOBSTRUCTED RAINFALL AND IS CLEAR OF IRRIGATION SPRAY.

SCALE: NONE

WIRELESS RAIN SENSOR-GUTTER MOUNT

WIRELESS RAIN SENSOR TRANSMITTER (GUTTER MOUNTED)
MOUNT RAIN SENSOR ON BUILDING WALL. ARCHITECT TO APPROVE LOCATION

CONTROLLER

RAIN SENSOR RECEIVER
2 SCALE: NONE
3WEATHERPROOF WIRE SPLICE ASSEMBLY
INSTRUCTIONS:

1. STRIP WIRES APPROXIMATELY 1/2" FROM ENDS TO EXPOSE WIRE.

2. TWIST CONNECTOR AROUND WIRES CLOCKWISE UNTIL HAND TIGHT, DO NOT OVERTIGHTEN.

3. INSERT WIRE ASSEMBLY TO BOTTOM OF GEL-FILLED TUBE. CHECK TO MAKE SURE

CONNECTOR HAS BEEN PUSHED PAST LOCKING FINGERS AND IS SEATED AT THE BOTTOM OF THE TUBE.

4. PLACE WIRES WHICH EXIT TUBE IN WIRE EXIT HOLES AND CLOSE CAP UNTIL IT SNAPS.

5. INSPECT FINAL SPLICE ASSEMBLY THAT IT IS SECURED.

NOTE:

MAXIMUM # OF WIRES PER CONNECTOR:
·3-#14 GAUGE
·2-#12 GAUGE
STEP 5 STEP 4
STEP 1
STEP 2
STEP 3
SCALE: NONE
5 SCALE: NONE
4 2.5"MIN.
1 2
CARSON 1220 RECTANGULAR PLASTIC
VALVE BOX WITH LID. INSTALL PER
REMOTE CONTROL VALVE DETAIL.
14 16
SCHEDULE 80 PVC NIPPLE (LENGTH AS
REQUIRED).
17 18
19 20
SCHEDULE 80 PVC NIPPLE (LENGTH AS
REQUIRED).
21 DURA 1"x1" THREADED ADAPTER (PART
#08303) 6 TOTAL.
8 12
13 DRIP REMOTE CONTROL VALVE. REFER TO
LEGEND FOR MODEL.

SCHEDULE 40 PVC LATERAL TO DRIP
IRRIGATION.
9FILTER. REFER TO LEGEND FOR MODEL.
5NDS 1"LO-TORQ BALL VALVE THREADED
(PART #LT-1000-T)
DURA 1" SLIP X 1" SWIVEL (PART
#329-011) 4 TOTAL.

QUICK COUPLING VALVE. INSTALL PER
DETAIL.
10" ROUND BOX. INSTALL PER DETAIL.
5 3
2 1671417
8 9
10 11
12 13
15 SCH 40 PVC 90° ELBOW (SxS) FROM PVC
MAIN LINE BELOW.
4 SCH 40 PVC PIPE. LENGTH AS REQUIRED.
3SCH 80 PVC MALE ADAPTER.
4 6
7DURA 1" MULTI-PORT MANIFOLD (PART
#301-010-4)
1040 PSI REGULATOR. REFER TO LEGEND FOR
MODEL.
11DURA 1" x 3/4" MALE ADAPTER (PART
#08303-131) 3 TOTAL. ONLY REQUIRED
WITH 3/4" OUTLET REGULATORS. USE
1"x1" DURA THREAD ADAPTER ON 1"

REGULATORS
15 FOUR REMOTE VALVE MANIFOLD DETAIL WITH QUICK COUPLING VALVE (1" VALVES ONLY) 16 SCHEDULE 80 PVC 90° ELBOW
(TxT).

SCHEDULE 40 PVC LATERAL TO BUBBLERS
OR SPRAY IRRIGATION.
1 2
CARSON 1220 RECTANGULAR PLASTIC
VALVE BOX WITH LID. INSTALL PER
REMOTE CONTROL VALVE DETAIL.
15 18
SCHEDULE 80 PVC THREADED FEMALE
COUPLING TO SERVICE QCV. IF NO QCV
INSTALL A DURA 1" CAP (PART #348-010)
SCHEDULE 80 PVC NIPPLE (LENGTH AS
REQUIRED).
19 20
SCHEDULE 80 PVC 90° ELBOW (TxT).

SCHEDULE 80 PVC NIPPLE (LENGTH AS
REQUIRED).

DURA 1"x1" THREADED ADAPTER (PART
#08303) 4 TOTAL.
9 13
14 DRIP REMOTE CONTROL VALVE. REFER TO
LEGEND FOR MODEL.

SCHEDULE 40 PVC LATERAL TO DRIP

IRRIGATION
10FILTER. REFER TO LEGEND FOR MODEL.
5NDS 1"LO-TORQ BALL VALVE THREADED
(PART #LT-1000-T)
DURA 1" SLIP X 1" SWIVEL (PART
#329-011) 2 TOTAL.

SCH 40 PVC 90° ELBOW (SxS) FROM PVC
MAIN LINE BELOW.

SCH 40 PVC PIPE. LENGTH AS REQUIRED.
3SCH 80 PVC MALE ADAPTER.
4 7
8DURA 1" MULTI-PORT MANIFOLD (PART
#301-010-2)
1140 PSI REGULATOR. REFER TO LEGEND FOR
MODEL.
12DURA 1" x 3/4" MALE ADAPTER (PART
#08303-131). ONLY REQUIRED WITH 3/4"
OUTLET REGULATORS. USE 1"x1" DURA
THREAD ADAPTER ON 1" REGULATORS
16 BUBBLER OR SPRINKLER REMOTE CONTROL
VALVE. REFER TO LEGEND FOR MODEL.
17SCHEDULE 40 PVC LATERAL TO BUBBLER OR
SPRAY IRRIGATION.

DURA 1" MIPT x 1" SWIVEL 90° (PART
#306-009)
6 781519
20 17
11 18
16 10
5 3
1 2
9 12
13 14
4 6

2.5"MIN.
22 QUICK COUPLING VALVE. INSTALL PER DETAIL.
10" ROUND BOX. INSTALL PER DETAIL.
21 21
22 TWO REMOTE VALVE MANIFOLD DETAIL WITH QUICK COUPLING VALVE (1" VALVES ONLY) SCHEDULE 80 PVC THREADED FEMALE
COUPLING TO SERVICE QCV. IF NO QCV
INSTALL A DURA 1" CAP (PART #348-010)

BUBBLER OR SPRINKLER REMOTE CONTROL
VALVE. REFER TO LEGEND FOR MODEL.
18 21
20 19
1 SCALE: NONE

IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT LAYOUT DIAGRAM DETAIL
3 16
1 7
13 NOTES:

1. THIS LAYOUT IS TO PROVIDE INFORMATION ON EQUIPMENT AND TYPICAL DISTANCES REQUIRED BETWEEN THE EQUIPMENT. IT IS DIAGRAMMATIC AND WILL NEED TO BE ADJUSTED ACCORDING TO AVAILABLE FLOOR SPACE AND OTHER EQUIPMENT INSTALLED WITHIN THE ENCLOSURE. OFFSETS AND FITTINGS WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THESE ADJUSTMENTS.

2. MAINTAIN 6" OF CLEARANCE FROM BUILDING WALLS FOR EASE OF MAINTENANCE FOR ALL COPPER PIPING, VALVES, AND FITTINGS.

3. SEAL ALL PIPE PENETRATIONS THROUGH WALLS/STRUCTURE AS REQUIRED (BY PLUMBING CONTRACTOR). SEE PLUMBING/WATERPROOFING DRAWINGS.

4. ALL FITTINGS AND PIPING FOR WATER LINES WITHIN EQUIPMENT ROOM SHALL BE COPPER WITH WROT FITTINGS OR BRASS NIPPLES. 9 11 2
5 8
IRRIGATION CONTROLLER BY IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR. MINIMUM 42" ABOVE FINISHED FLOOR.

SUB-METER FOR IRRIGATION.1.25" COPPER MAIN LINE ROUTED THROUGH STRUCTURE TO STUB-OUT LOCATION(S) AT ROOF LEVEL. INSTALLED BY PLUMBING CONTRACTOR. (REFER TO MEP PLAN FOR

EXACT ROUTING THRU BUILDING)

UNI-STRUT SUPPORT BRACKET, THREADED EXTENSIONS AND CLAMPS, LENGTH AS REQUIRED. PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 6" SEPARATION FOR THE VALVES AND PIPE FROM THE WALL.

1.25" COPPER MAIN LINE TO FOR IRRIGATION FROM DOMESTIC LINE WITHIN EQUIPMENT ROOM. SHOWN ON MEP PLANS.

MASTER VALVE AND FLOW SENSOR. PROVIDE A MINIMUM LENGTH OF 10" UPSTREAM OF FLOW SENSOR AND 5" DOWNSTREAM OF ANY FITTING. 6 MIN. 18" ± FROM FINISH FLOOR.

1.25" BRASS BALL VALVE.
101" ELECTRICAL CONDUIT WITH JUNCTION BOXES FOR CONTROL WIRES FOR FLOW SENSOR & MASTER VALVE.
4 124
3 6
5 7
8 9
10 11 12 13 14
15 INTERIOR WALL
1" WILKENS REDUCED PRESSURE BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY.

WATER BOOSTER PUMP FOR IRRIGATION BY OTHERS.

ALL FITTINGS AND PIPING FOR WATER LINES WITHIN EQUIPMENT ROOM SHALL BE COPPER WITH WROT FITTINGS OR BRASS NIPPLES.
121.25" COPPER MAIN LINE ROUTED THROUGH STRUCTURE TO STUB-OUT LOCATION(S) AT SITE LEVEL. INSTALLED BY PLUMBING CONTRACTOR. (REFER TO MEP PLAN FOR

EXACT ROUTING THRU BUILDING)
141.25" ELECTRICAL CONDUIT WITH REQUIRED JUNCTION BOXES ROUTED THROUGH

STRUCTURE FROM CONTROLLER LOCATION TO STUB-OUT LOCATION(S) AT ROOF LEVEL. INSTALLED BY ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR.
151.25" ELECTRICAL CONDUIT WITH REQUIRED JUNCTION BOXES ROUTED THROUGH

STRUCTURE FROM CONTROLLER LOCATION TO STUB-OUT LOCATION(S) AT ROOF LEVEL. INSTALLED BY ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR.
16 120 VOLT A.C. ELECTRICAL BY ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR FOR CONTROLLER.

FS
MV
171" PRESSURE REDUCING VALVE.
17 01.06.2023 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMITTAL

05.01.2023 RESPONSE TO DESIGN REVIEW
ATTACHMENT 2
ZAB 05-11-2023

3000

SHATTUCK

ALL DRAWINGS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL APPEARING

HEREIN CONSTITUTE ORIGINAL AND UNPUBLISHED

WORK OF THE ARCHITECT AND MAY NOT BE

DUPLICATED, USED OR DISCLOSED WITHOUT WRITTEN
CONSENT OF TRACHTENBERG ARCHITECTS.
2104 JOB:

SHEET:
2421 Fourth Street
Berkeley, California 94710
510.649.1414
www.TrachtenbergArch.com

TRACHTENBERG

ARCHITECTS

03.09.2021 REVISED BASE PLANS
3000 Shattuck Ave
Berkeley, CA
landscape architecture
6000 Harwood Ave
Oakland CA 94618
www.aboutinsideout.com

07.08.2022 ZONING INCOMPLETE RESPONSE

IRRIGATION
DETAIL
I1.4
SCALE: NONE
7QUICK COUPLING VALVE
NOTE:

SIDE VIEW

TOP VIEW
1" [25mm]
10" ROUND PLASTIC VALVE BOX WITH
BOLT DOWN LID.
1 1/4" x 1 1/4" x 3/16" [30mm x 30mm x
5mm] ANGLE IRON 30" [760mm] LONG
W/2 STAINLESS STEEL STRAPS (ONE
AROUND QCV).

PVC MAIN LINE.
3" [75mm] LONG SCHEDULE 80 PVC
THREADED NIPPLE.

QUICK COUPLING VALVE.

SCHEDULE 80 PVC THREADED NIPPLE.
10" [250mm] LONG SCHEDULE 80 PVC
THREADED NIPPLE.

UPC APPROVED SCHEDULE 40 PVC TEE
OR ELBOW.

SCHEDULE 80 PVC THREADED 90° ELL.
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10

NIPPLES AND FITTINGS TO BE SAME SIZE AS
VALVE IPT INLET THREAD SIZE.

REFER TO

IRRIGATION
LEGEND
1 2
3 4
6 5
9 10
11 12
FINISH GRADE.
7 8
19 GAUGE 1/2" [13mm] SQUARE WIRE
MESH.

BRICK - 2 TOTAL.
11 12
PEA GRAVEL OR 3/4" DRAIN ROCK- 4"
[100mm] DEEP BELOW VALVE (NO SOIL
IN VALVE BOX).
13 13
SCALE: NONE
8 NOTE:

1.NIPPLES AND FITTINGS TO BE SAME SIZE AS VALVE IPT INLET THREAD SIZE.

2. TRIM VALVE BOX LENGTH AS NECESSARY TO BE FLUSH WITH TOP OF PLANTING TILES.

3. IF NECESSARY SLOT SIDES VALVE BOX TO ALLOW PASSAGE OF PIPE THROUGH BOTTOM OF VALVE BOX.

QUICK-COUPLING VALVE
VALVE BOX WITH COVER:
10-INCH SIZE
PVC SCH 80 NIPPLE
(LENGTH AS REQUIRED)
PVC SCH 80 NIPPLE
(LENGTH AS REQUIRED)

SIDE VIEW

TOP VIEW
SCHEDULE 80 PVC THREADED 90° ELL.

PVC SCH 40 TEE OR ELL
PVC SCH 80 STREET ELL

STRUCTURAL FOAM OR ROOF

TOP OF FINISH GRADE

CRUSHED ROCK

QUICK COUPLING VALVE-ON STRUCTURE

PVC MAINLINE PIPE
SCALE: NONE
CARSON 1220 RECTANGULAR VALVE BOX
FOR FOUR VALVES OR CARSON 1419 FOR

TWO VALVES

REMOTE CONTROL VALVE WITH

FLOW CONTROL AND MANUAL
BLEED. REFER TO TWO OR FOUR

VALVE MANIFOLD DETAIL FOR

INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS

VALVE CONTROL WIRE- PROVIDE
3M-DBY SEAL PACKS AT ALL SPLICES
AND 24" OF EXCESS UF WIRE IN A
1" DIAMETER COIL BRICK-1 EACH CORNER

FINISH GRADE
1 2
5 6
7 4
3 2
1 1
19 GAUGE 1/2" SQUARE WIRE
MESH. WRAP UP THE SIDES OF THE
BOX
PEA GRAVEL OR 3/4" DRAIN ROCK-
4" DEEP BELOW VALVE (NO SOIL IN

VALVE BOX)

BUBBLER OR SPRAY REMOTE CONTROL VALVE

IN TWO OR FOUR VALVE MANIFOLD
6 7
3 4
5 8
SCH 40 PVC LATERAL LINE TO

BUBBLERS OR SPRAY
8 SCALE: NONE
CARSON 1220 RECTANGULAR VALVE BOX
FOR FOUR VALVES OR CARSON 1419 FOR

TWO VALVES

VALVE CONTROL WIRE- PROVIDE
3M-DBY SEAL PACKS AT ALL SPLICES
AND 24" OF EXCESS UF WIRE IN A
1" DIAMETER COIL
BRICK-1 EACH CORNER

FINISH GRADE
1 2
5 6
9 4
3 2
1 2
19 GAUGE 1/2" SQUARE WIRE
MESH. WRAP UP THE SIDES OF THE
BOX
PEA GRAVEL OR 3/4" DRAIN ROCK-
4" DEEP BELOW VALVE (NO SOIL IN

VALVE BOX)

DRIP REMOTE CONTROL VALVE IN TWO OR

FOUR VALVE MANIFOLD
7 9
3 4
5 6
SCH 40 PVC LATERAL LINE TO
DRIPLINE OR DRIP.
8 8
7DRIP FILTER AND REGULATOR

REMOTE CONTROL VALVE WITH

FLOW CONTROL AND MANUAL
BLEED. REFER TO TWO OR FOUR

VALVE MANIFOLD DETAIL FOR

INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS
A1
9 VALVE I.D. TAG (WITH CONTROL
AND STATION NUMBER).
9 A1
10 VALVE I.D. TAG (WITH CONTROL
AND STATION NUMBER).
10 1
4 6
2 #14AWG TWO WIRE CABLE FROM
CONTROLLER. REFER TO IRRIGATION NOTES
FOR MODEL NUMBER OF WIRE. ALLOW A
24" SLACK PER DECODER. USE ELECTRICAL
TAPE TO HOLD SLACK CABLES TOGETHER.

DECODER

TWO WIRE CABLE TO NEXT DECODER

ALL DECODERS SHALL HAVE A VALVE NUMBER ADDRESSED AT
CONTROLLER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.

NOTE:

1. 8VALVE BOX. REFER TO REMOTE

CONTROL VALVE DETAIL FOR
INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS.
9REMOTE CONTROL VALVE. REFER TO

REMOTE CONTROL VALVE DETAIL FOR
INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS. 3M DBR/Y-6 OR APPROVED EQUAL WATERPROOF SPLICE KIT (4 TOTAL)

DECODER WIRING IN CONDUIT
SCALE: NONE
2 1
6 7
3 3
9 8
5 DECODER
USE U.F. SAFETY CABLE STRIPPER BY KING INNOVATION (MODEL NUMBER 46200) FOR ALL TWO-WIRE SPLICE CONNECTIONS.

2. A MAXIMUM OF 4" OF WIRE SHALL BE

STRIPPED FROM TWO WIRE CABLE WHEN
SPLICING AT DECODERS.
4 CONNECT CORRECT DECODER WIRES

TO VALVE SOLENOID WIRES
7 5
5CONNECT CORRECT DECODER WIRES TO
TWO WIRE CABLES.
101.25" CONDUIT FOR 2 WIRE CABLE

WITH LONG SWEEPS IN AND OUT OF
EACH VALVE BOX. SEAL ALL CONDUIT

OPENINGS WITH WATERPROFF
FOAM.
6 SCALE: NONE

TWO WIRE
CABLE
10" ROUND VALVE BOX
2-WIRE SPLICE BOX AT MAIN LINE TEE OR 3

WAY WIRE BRANCH
3M DBR/Y-6 OR

APPROVED EQUAL

WATERPROOF
CONNECTOR.

SCALE: NONE
4 1
2 3
42-WIRE PATH JACKETED/ TWISTED

TO NEXT DECODER
6 INSTALL 5/8" DIAMETER COPPER
GROUND ROD OF 8' LENGTH.
7 NOTE:
2-WIRE PATH JACKETED/ TWISTED FROM
CONTROLLER. ALLOW A 24" SLACK PER

DECODER

LIGHTNING ARRESTOR
1 2
3 4
7 5

1.25" CONDUIT FOR 2 WIRE CABLE

WITH LONG SWEEPS IN AND OUT OF
EACH VALVE BOX. SEAL ALL CONDUIT

OPENINGS WITH WATERPROOF
FOAM.

CONDUIT FOR
TWO WIRE CABLE.

SEAL OPENINGS WITH
WATERPROOF FOAM.

FINISH GRADE
SCALE: NONE
3IRRIGATION TWO WIRE PULL BOX
3M DBR/Y-6 OR APPROVED EQUAL
WATERPROOF SPLICE KIT (4 TOTAL)
11 10
BRICK-ONE ON EACH CORNER11
8 BRICK-ONE ON EACH CORNER8

PEA GRAVEL

BRICK-ONE ON

EACH CORNER
1 2
3 5
3"
1 6
3 FINISH GRADE
24" LOOP OF TWO WIRE CABLE.

SCHEDULE 40 U.L. LISTED PVC

CONDUIT
8 PEA GRAVEL OR 3/4" [20mm] DRAIN
ROCK - 4" [102mm] DEEP BELOW
VALVE (NO SOIL IN VALVE BOX).
8 2
5 BRICK-ONE ON EACH CORNER
4 7
7 SEAL ALL CONDUIT OPENINGS
WITH WATERPROOF FOAM.
9 9

GREY RECTANGULAR PLASTIC VALVE
BOX WITH BOLT DOWN LID. HEAT
BRAND "PB" INTO LID.

LIGHTNING ARRESTOR (MODEL
WT2W-LSP). 1 EVERY 500' FROM
STARTING FROM CONTROLLER.

TWO WIRE DECODER SYSTEMS MUST BE PROPERLY GROUNDED IN ORDER TO PROTECT AGAINST LIGHTNING SURGES. THE COMMUNICATION CABLE MUST BE GROUNDED NO FURTHER THAN 500' FROM ANY DECODER. THE SURGE DEVICE MUST BE A WEATHERTRAK MODEL WT2W-LSP. THE MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN THE SURGE ARRESTOR AND THE GROUND ROD SHOULD BE 3' (91.4CM). WEATHERTRAK

RECOMMENDS A SPLIT BOLT CONNECTION TO BE USED TO CONNECT THE SURGE DEVICE TO THE GROUND WIRE WITH A 3M DBY-6 WATERPROOF CONNECTOR. 9 9GREY RECTANGULAR PLASTIC VALVE
BOX WITH BOLT DOWN LID. HEAT
BRAND "GR" INTO LID.
6 4
SCHEDULE 40 PVC SWEEP ELLS
18 GAUGE 1/2" [13mm] SQUARE
STAINLESS STEEL WIRE MESH.
6 518 GAUGE 1/2" [13mm] SQUARE
STAINLESS STEEL WIRE MESH.

01.06.2023 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMITTAL

05.01.2023 RESPONSE TO DESIGN REVIEW
ATTACHMENT 2
ZAB 05-11-2023

3000

SHATTUCK

ALL DRAWINGS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL APPEARING

HEREIN CONSTITUTE ORIGINAL AND UNPUBLISHED

WORK OF THE ARCHITECT AND MAY NOT BE

DUPLICATED, USED OR DISCLOSED WITHOUT WRITTEN
CONSENT OF TRACHTENBERG ARCHITECTS.
2104 JOB:

SHEET:
2421 Fourth Street
Berkeley, California 94710
510.649.1414
www.TrachtenbergArch.com

TRACHTENBERG

ARCHITECTS

03.09.2021 REVISED BASE PLANS
3000 Shattuck Ave
Berkeley, CA
landscape architecture
6000 Harwood Ave
Oakland CA 94618
www.aboutinsideout.com

07.08.2022 ZONING INCOMPLETE RESPONSE

IRRIGATION
DETAIL
I1.5
SCALE: NONE
1HLD DRIPLINE CENTER FEED LAYOUT
SCALE: NONE
2HLD DRIPLINE END FEED LAYOUT
SCALE: NONE
3HLD DRIPLINE ISLAND LAYOUT
SCALE: NONE
6HLD DRIPLINE CENTER FEED MANIFOLD
PLAN
FV
FV
AV
11 10
8 9
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 FLUSH VALVE PLUMBED TO

FLUSH MANIFOLD AT LOW
POINT

MANIFOLD-TO-ELBOW
CONNECTION (TYP).

PVC LATERAL LINE FROM
VALVE. MINIMUM SIZE TO
BE 1" UNLESS OTHERWISE
NOTED.

PVC SUPPLY MANIFOLD.

EXTEND TO END OF
ZONE/EXHAUST HEADER.

MANIFOLD-TO-TEE
CONNECTION.

DRIPLINE LATERAL.

AIR/VACUUM RELIEF

LATERAL, BLANK POLY

TUBING CENTERED ON
MOUND OR BERM.

AIR/VACUUM RELIEF
PLUMBED TO BLANK 5/8"

POLY TUBING AT EACH
HIGH POINT.

PERIMETER LATERALS 2"
[50mm] TO 4" [100mm]
FROM EDGE.

AREA PERIMETER.
12DRIPLINE OPERATION

INDICATOR LOCATED AT

THE ENDS OF EACH
DRIPLINE ZONE.
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12 1 2
PLAN
7 6
5 4
3 2
1 9
8 10
11 12
13 14
PVC TEE (SxSxS).

PVC ELL (SxS).

HUNTER PLD-ELBOW
(PLD-ELB)
HUNTER PLD-TEE (PLD-TEE).

BLANK 5/8" [16mm] POLY

TUBING AT SUPPLY AND

FLUSH END OF EACH
ISLAND.

REFER TO DRIPLINE TO PVC
CONNECTION DETAIL.

AIR/VACUUM RELIEF VALVE

PLUMBED TO TUBING AT
HIGH POINT.

DRIPLINE LATERAL.

MANUAL FLUSH VALVE

PLUMBED TO TUBING AT
LOW POINT.

DRIPLINE OPERATION

INDICATOR LOCATED AT

THE ENDS OF EACH
DRIPLINE ZONE.

ISLAND PERIMETER.

PERIMETER LATERALS 2"
[50mm] TO 4" [100mm]
FROM EDGE.

FV
FV
AV
FV
AV
AV
14 12
13 4
3 2
1 567
8 9
1011
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 ISOMETRIC
9 8
7 6
5 4
3 1
2 NOTE:

THE TOTAL LENGTH OF A SINGLE DRIP LINE RUN SHALL NOT EXCEED 300 FT.

FINISH GRADE.

DEPTH OF TUBING PER
IRRIGATION LEGEND.

DEPTH OF PVC LATERAL LINE

PER IRRIGATION LEGEND
DRIPLINE TUBING.

BLANK 5/8" [16mm] POLY

TUBING, LENGTH AS
NECESSARY.

PVC TEE (SxSxT) WITH 1/2" [13mm]
FPT OUTLET.

PVC LATERAL LINE FROM REMOTE
CONTROL VALVE.
11 10
8 9
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 PLAN

MANIFOLD-TO-ELBOW
CONNECTION (TYP).

DRIPLINE LATERAL.

AIR/VACUUM RELIEF VALVE
PLUMBED TO BLANK 5/8"

TUBING AT EACH HIGH
POINT.

AIR/VACUUM RELIEF
LATERAL, BLANK 5/8" POLY

TUBING CENTERED ON
MOUND OR BERM.

PERIMETER LATERALS 2"
[50mm] TO 4" [100mm]
FROM EDGE.

AREA PERIMETER.

DRIP OPERATION

INDICATOR LOCATED AT

THE ENDS OF EACH
DRIPLINE ZONES.

FLUSH VALVE PLUMBED TO

FLUSH MANIFOLD AT LOW
POINT.

FV
AV
10 9
8 7
6 5
4 3
2 1
11 NOTE:

1. THE TOTAL LENGTH OF ALL INTERCONNECTED DRIP LINE OFF A SINGLE PVC

SUPPLY LINE CONNECTION OR A SINGLE RUN OF DRIPLINE SHALL NOT EXCEED 300 FT.

2. INSTALL DRIPLINE 2-4" BELOW GRADE AND STAKE DOWN EVERY 4' OR AS REQUIRED.

NOTE:

1. THE TOTAL LENGTH OF A SINGLE DRIP LINE RUN SHALL NOT EXCEED 300 FT.

2. INSTALL DRIPLINE 2-4" BELOW GRADE AND STAKE DOWN EVERY 4' OR AS REQUIRED.

PVC FLUSH MANIFOLD.

MINIMUM SIZE TO BE 1"
UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.

PVC LATERAL LINE FROM
VALVE. MINIMUM SIZE TO
BE 1" UNLESS OTHERWISE
NOTED.

PVC LATERAL LINE FROM
VALVE. MINIMUM SIZE TO
BE 1" UNLESS OTHERWISE
NOTED.

PVC FLUSH MANIFOLD.

MINIMUM SIZE TO BE 1"
UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
1" FLEXIBLE PVC IPS HOSE
FLUSH MANIFOLD.
1" FLEXIBLE PVC IPS HOSE
FLUSH MANIFOLD.

NOT TO SCALE

SECTION
AV
FV

NOT TO SCALE
PLAN
AV
FV
7 6
5 4
3 2
1 8
9 10
4 7
11 NOTE:

1. THE TOTAL LENGTH OF ALL INTERCONNECTED DRIP LINE OFF A SINGLE PVC

SUPPLY LINE CONNECTION OR A SINGLE RUN OF DRIPLINE SHALL NOT EXCEED 300 FT.

2. INSTALL DRIPLINE 2-4" BELOW GRADE AND STAKE DOWN EVERY 4' OR AS REQUIRED.

NOTE:

1. THE TOTAL LENGTH OF ALL INTERCONNECTED DRIP LINE OFF A SINGLE PVC

SUPPLY LINE CONNECTION OR A SINGLE RUN OF DRIPLINE SHALL NOT EXCEED 300 FT.

2. INSTALL DRIPLINE 2-4" BELOW GRADE AND STAKE DOWN EVERY 4' OR AS REQUIRED.

SCALE: NONE
4HLD DRIPLINE TRIANGULAR LAYOUT
11 10
8 9
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 FLUSH VALVE PLUMBED TO

FLUSH MANIFOLD AT LOW
POINT

PVC LATERAL LINE FROM
VALVE. MINIMUM SIZE TO
BE 1" UNLESS OTHERWISE
NOTED.

PVC SUPPLY MANIFOLD.

DRIPLINE LATERAL.

PERIMETER LATERALS 2"
[50mm] TO 4" [100mm]
FROM EDGE.

AREA PERIMETER.

DRIPLINE OPERATION

INDICATOR LOCATED AT

THE ENDS OF EACH
DRIPLINE ZONE.
1" SCH 40 PVC OR FLEXIBLE

PVC IPS HOSE FLUSH
MANIFOLD.

MANIFOLD-TO-ELBOW
CONNECTION.

HUNTER PLD AIR/VACUUM

RELIEF VALVE (PLD-AVR)

PLUMBED TO SUPPLY
MANIFOLD AT HIGH POINT.

SCALE: NONE
DRIPLINE TO PVC CONNECTION7

REFER TO

IRRIGATION
LEGEND
4"
1FINISH GRADE
12 3
4 5
8 7
6 9
2CARSON 708 OR EQUAL.

COLOR: BLACK. USE PURPLE

FOR RECYCLED WATER
SYSTEMS.
3DRIPLINE TUBING
4 5TORO 1/2" CHECK VALVE
(PCV-500)
61/2" SCH 40 MALE
ADAPTER.
7 8
BRICK (1 OF 2)
1/2" SCH 40 PVC (LENGTH AS

REQUIRED)
9PVC LATERAL LINE SUPPLY.

MINIMUM SIZE TO BE 1" UNLESS

SIZED DIFFERENTLY ON
DRAWINGS. USE SCH 40 PVC
1"x1"x1/2" TEE OR 90° ELBOW.

HUNTER PLD-TEE (PLD-TEE)
NOTE:

1. THE TOTAL LENGTH OF ALL INTERCONNECTED DRIP LINE OFF A SINGLE PVC

SUPPLY LINE CONNECTION OR A SINGLE RUN OF DRIPLINE SHALL NOT EXCEED 300 FT.

2. INSTALL DRIPLINE 2-4" BELOW GRADE AND STAKE DOWN EVERY 4' OR AS REQUIRED.

SCALE: NONE
5HLD DRIPLINE ODD CURVE LAYOUT
10 8
9 1
2 3
4 5
6 7

FLUSH VALVE PLUMBED TO

FLUSH MANIFOLD AT LOW
POINT

PVC SUPPLY LINE/HEADER
FROM VALVE. MINIMUM
SIZE TO BE 1" UNLESS
OTHERWISE NOTED.

DRIPLINE LATERAL.

PERIMETER LATERALS 2"
[50mm] TO 4" [100mm]
FROM EDGE.

AREA PERIMETER.

DRIPLINE OPERATION

INDICATOR LOCATED AT

THE ENDS OF EACH
DRIPLINE ZONE.
1" SCH 40 PVC OR FLEXIBLE

PVC IPS HOSE
FLUSH/EXHAUST MANIFOLD.

MANIFOLD-TO-ELBOW
CONNECTION.
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 9
8 4
10 SCALE: NONE
8DRIPLINE MANIFOLD TO ELBOW CONNECTION
1 2
3 4
5 6 FINISH GRADE

DRIPLINE TUBING

SECTION/ELEVATION

NOT TO SCALE
1 8
23 6
5 7
4 DEPTH OF TUBING PER
IRRIGATION LEGEND.
7SCH 40 PVC TEE (SxSxT)
WITH 1/2" FPT OUTLET.
8DEPTH OF PVC LATERAL LINE

PER IRRIGATION LEGEND

HUNTER PLD AIR/VACUUM

RELIEF VALVE (PLD-AVR)

PLUMBED TO SUPPLY
MANIFOLD AT HIGH POINT.

HUNTER PLD-TEE (PLD-TEE)

HUNTER PLD-TEE (PLD-TEE)

HUNTER PLD-MPT ADAPTER
(PLD-050)

HUNTER PLD-MPT ADAPTER
(PLD-050) HUNTER PLD-ELBOW (PLD-ELB)
BLANK 5/8" [16mm] POLY

TUBING, LENGTH AS
NECESSARY.

HUNTER PLD-TEE X 1/2" FPT

ADAPTER

01.06.2023 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMITTAL

05.01.2023 RESPONSE TO DESIGN REVIEW
ATTACHMENT 2
ZAB 05-11-2023