3000
SHATTUCK
ALL DRAWINGS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL APPEARING
HEREIN CONSTITUTE ORIGINAL AND UNPUBLISHED
WORK OF THE ARCHITECT AND MAY NOT BE
DUPLICATED, USED OR DISCLOSED WITHOUT WRITTEN
CONSENT OF TRACHTENBERG ARCHITECTS.
2104 JOB:
SHEET:
2421 Fourth Street
Berkeley, California 94710
510.649.1414
www.TrachtenbergArch.com
TRACHTENBERG
ARCHITECTS
03.09.2021 REVISED BASE PLANS
3000 Shattuck Ave
Berkeley, CA
landscape architecture
6000 Harwood Ave
Oakland CA 94618
www.aboutinsideout.com
07.08.2022 ZONING INCOMPLETE RESPONSE
IRRIGATION
DETAIL
I1.6
SCALE: NONE
DRIPLINE-FLUSH POINT2
NOTE:
ALLOW A MINIMUM OF PVC HOSE IN
VALVE BOX IN ORDER TO DIRECT FLUSHED
WATER OUTSIDE VALVE BOX.
24 5
1 67
1/2" SCH 40 THREADED BALL VALVE.
6" ROUND PLASTIC VALVE BOX.
PEA GRAVEL SUMP (6" DEEP).
FINISH GRADE
3 1/2" SCH 40 MALE ADAPTER.
SCALE: NONE
ON STRUCTURE STUB-OUT WITH BRONZE BALL
VALVE3
1 1
2 3
4 8
7 BRONZE BALL VALVE.
6 10
9 COPPER 90° ELBOW.
COPPER MALE ADAPTER.
CONDUIT FOR CONTROL WIRES
THROUGH STRUCTURE PROVIDED BY
ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR.
WATERPROOF ALL PENETRATIONS
COPPER PIPE THROUGH STRUCTURE
PROVIDED BY PLUMBING
CONTRACTOR. WATERPROOF ALL
PENETRATIONS.10
24 7
9 6
SCH 40 PVC MALE ADAPTER.
3 SLOPED ROOF BELOW PEDESTAL
SYSTEM
5 5
PVC MAIN LINE TO REMOTE CONTROL
VALVES.
ROOF DECK PAVERS8
11 1110" ROUND PLASTIC VALVE BOX. CUT
BOX TO FIT BELOW PEDESTAL PAVER
SYSTEM
TWO-WIRE CABLE OR CONTROL
WIRES
SCALE: NONE
1DRIPLINE OPERATION INDICATOR
4 ECO INDICATOR
5 FINISHED GRADE
6 MULCH
PVC LATERAL PIPE OR DRIPLINE
3 4
5 6
UPC APPROVED SCHEDULE 40 PVC TEE, ELBOW OR BARB x THREAD DRIP FITTING TEE OR ELBOW WITH 3/4" OUTLET.
1 2
3 1/2" X 3/4" X 6" HUNTER SWING JOINT (SJ-7506)2
1 1
2 1" IPS PVC HOSE FROM EXHAUST HEADER.
BRICK (1 OF 2)
6 5
4 3
7 SCALE: NONE
6TREE BUBBLER
UPHILL
TREE BUBBLER PLACEMENT EXAMPLES
UPHILL
LEVEL GRADE SLOPED GRADE
1 4
5 6
7 8
BUBBLER (TO BE INSTALLED ON TOP
OF ROOTBALL).
FINISH GRADE.
TREE OR SHRUB ROOTBALL.
1/2" IPS FLEXIBLE PVC. USE WELD-ON
795 SOLVENT CEMENT OR EQUAL
WHEN BONDING PVC HOSE TO
FITTINGS.
PVC TEE (SST), ELBOW (ST) OR FEMALE
ADAPTER.
PVC LATERAL LINE.
TREE.
EDGE OF ROOTBALL (TYPICAL).
10 11
1 5
6 7
8 10
11 1/2" SCH. 40 MALE ADAPTER
(2 TOTAL).
2 3
2 4
36" STAPLE.
9 TREE STAKES.9
1 NOTE:
SUGGESTED QUANTITY OF BUBBLERS
PER TREES AND SHRUBS SIZE:
·15 GAL OR 24" BOX = 2
BUBBLERS
·36" OR 48" BOX = 4 BUBBLERS
REFER TO
IRRIGATION
LEGEND
SCALE: NONE
5VALVE BOX INSTALLATION
A1
12" TYPICAL
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. CENTER VALVE BOX OVER REMOTE CONTROL VALVE TO FACILITATE SERVICING VALVE.
2. SET BOXES 1" ABOVE FINISH GRADE OR MULCH COVER IN GROUND COVER/SHRUB AREA AND FLUSH WITH FINISH GRADE IN TURF AREA.
3. SET RCV AND VALVE BOX ASSEMBLY IN GROUND COVER/SHRUB AREA WHERE POSSIBLE. INSTALL IN LAWN ONLY IF GROUND COVER DOES NOT EXIST ADJACENT TO LAWN.
4. SET BOXES PARALLEL TO EACH OTHER AND PERPENDICULAR TO EDGE OF LAWN, WALK, FENCE, CURB, ETC.
5. AVOID HEAVILY COMPACTING SOIL AROUND VALVE BOXES TO PREVENT COLLAPSE AND DEFORMATION OF VALVE BOX SIDES.
6. INSTALL EXTENSION BY VALVE BOX MANUFACTURER AS REQUIRED TO COMPLETELY ENCLOSE ASSEMBLY FOR EASY ACCESS.
12"
1CONTROLLER ID.
3RECTANGULAR VALVE BOX.
ROUND VALVE BOX FOR QCV
AND GATE VALVE. HEAT BRAND
VALVE TYPE INTO INTO LID PER
TABLE.
EDGE OF LAWN, WALK, FENCE,
CURB, ETC.
1 TREE
2 2ALL TREE VALVES TO HAVE TREE
BRANDED INTO LID.
3 VALVE IDENTIFICATION
12" 12"
5 5
TOP VIEW OF BOXES
7 7
ITEMS TO BRAND:BRAND CODE
GATE VALVEGV
PRESSURE REDUCERPRV
MASTER VALVEMV
FLOW SENSORFS
SPLICE BOXSB
QUICK COUPLERQC
PULL BOXPB
LIGHTNING ARRESTORLA
MAIN LINE AIR RELIEFARV
HYDROMETERHM
GROUND RODGR
REMOTE CONTROL VALVE A___
XX A1
4 4HEAT BRAND VALVE TYPE PER
TABLE OR CONTROLLER ID AND
STATION NUMBER INTO LID.
6 6STATION NUMBER.
SCALE: NONE
4TRENCHING
2 1
3 5
6 CLEAN BACKFILL MATERIAL.
FINISH GRADE.
LATERAL LINE.
MAIN LINE.
TWO WIRE CABLE IN CONDUIT
43" DETECTABLE WARNING TAPE OVER MAIN LINE. INSTALL 3" ABOVE MAIN LINE.
USE CHRISTY MODEL #TA-DT-3-BIRR FOR POTABLE IRRIGATION SYSTEMS OR #TA-DT-3-PRW FOR RECYCLED IRRIGATION WATER SYSTEMS
NOTES:
1. ALL MAIN SUPPLY LINES AND LATERAL LINES SHALL BE PLACED IN SLEEVES UNDER PAVED SURFACES. INSTALL LOW VOLTAGE WIRES WITHIN A SEPARATE CONDUIT UNDER PAVED SURFACES. DO NOT TAPE WIRES WITHIN CONDUIT.
2. REUSE SALVAGED EXCAVATED FILL AND COMPACT TO ORIGINAL DENSITY IN LANDSCAPE AREAS. ALL OTHER AREAS SHALL BE AT 95% COMPACTION. BACKFILL
MATERIAL SHALL BE THE EARTH EXCAVATED FROM THE TRENCHES, FREE FROM ROCKS (ANYTHING LARGER THAN 2"), CONCRETE CHUNKS, AND OTHER FOREIGN OR COARSE MATERIALS.
3. WHEN 12" POP-UP SPRINKLER HEADS ARE USED, INCREASE THE DEPTH OF LATERAL TO 18" AT THE SPRINKLER LOCATION ONLY.
8"-12"
MIN.
6"
MIN.
6"
MIN.6"-12"
MIN.
4"
18"
12"
4"
2 1
3 4
6 5
LATERAL, MAIN,
AND WIRES
MAIN AND
WIRES ONLY
LATERAL
ONLY
MULTIPLE
LATERALS
01.06.2023 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMITTAL
05.01.2023 RESPONSE TO DESIGN REVIEW
ATTACHMENT 2
ZAB 05-11-2023
SHATTUCK AVE.
ASHBY AVE.
EMERSON ST.
PROJECT SITE
3000 SHATTUCK
GENERAL
INFORMATION
A0.0
Xref .\2120 - Titleblock 24 x36.dwg
3000
SHATTUCK
ALL DRAWINGS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL APPEARING
HEREIN CONSTITUTE ORIGINAL AND UNPUBLISHED
WORK OF THE ARCHITECT AND MAY NOT BE
DUPLICATED, USED OR DISCLOSED WITHOUT WRITTEN
CONSENT OF TRACHTENBERG ARCHITECTS.
2104 JOB:
SHEET:
2421 Fourth Street
Berkeley, California 94710
510.649.1414
www.TrachtenbergArch.com
TRACHTENBERG
ARCHITECTS
03.15.2022 ZONING APPLICATION
3000 Shattuck Ave
Berkeley, CA
07.08.2022 ZONING RESUBMITTAL
01.19.2023 DRC HEARING SET
01.20.2023 LOADING ZONE PLAN
05.11.2023 ZAB HEARING SET
N.T.S.
N
VICINITY MAPPROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT DIRECTORY
ZONING CODE SUMMARY
(BASED ON THE BERKELEY MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE)
ZONING: C-SA
SEE SHEET A0.1 FOR COMPLETE ZONING DATA
PROJECT SPONSOR:
3000 Shattuck Avenue, LLC
NX Ventures, LLC
1958A University Ave
Berkeley, CA 94704
ARCHITECT:
Isaiah Stackhouse, Principal
TRACHTENBERG ARCHITECTS
2421 Fourth Street
Berkeley, CA 94710
510.649.1414
www.trachtenbergarch.com
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT:
Penn Phillips
INSIDEOUT DESIGN
6000 Harwood Avenue
Oakland CA 94618
510.655.7674
www.aboutinsideout.com
PROJECT ADDRESS: 3000 Shattuck
Berkeley, CA 94705 (APN: 053 159200100)
SCOPE OF WORK:
REMOVAL OF EXISTING 1 STORY COMMERCIAL STRUCTURE & CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW 9-STORY MIXED-USE BUILDING WITH 156-DWELLING UNITS, GROUND LEVEL LOBBIES AND COMMERCIAL SPACE WITH STATE OF CALIFORNIA DENSITY BONUS.
DRAWING LIST
A0.0GENERAL INFORMATION
FLOOR PLANSA2.1
A1.1SITE SURVEY
A2.2
A3.1BUILDING ELEVATIONS
A3.2BUILDING ELEVATIONS
A3.3
A0.1
DENSITY BONUS DIAGRAMS
A0.5SITE CONTEXT PHOTOS
A0.3A
A0.6VICINITY MAP
ZONING INFORMATION & DIAGRAMS
FLOOR PLANS
BUILDING ELEVATIONS
A3.4BUILDING ELEVATIONS
A3.5
MATMATERIAL BOARD
A2.3FLOOR PLANS
A3.6PHOTO CONTEXT VIEWS
DENSITY BONUS CALCULATIONSA0.3B
SHADOW STUDIESA0.4A
SHADOW STUDIESA0.4B
SHADOW STUDIESA0.4C
A3.7PHOTO CONTEXT VIEWS
A3.8PERSPECTIVE VIEWS
A3.9PERSPECTIVE VIEWS
L1.0GROUND LEVEL LANDSCAPE PLAN
L1.1ROOF DECK LANDSCAPE PLAN
A4.1BUILDING SECTION
STREETSCAPE ELEVATIONS
A5.1CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN
A3.10PERSPECTIVE VIEWS
A3.11PERSPECTIVE VIEWS
A3.12PERSPECTIVE VIEWS
L2.0LANDSCAPE IMAGERY
I1.0GROUND LEVEL IRRIGATION PLAN
I1.1ROOF DECK IRRIGATION PLAN
I1.2IRRIGATION NOTES AND LEGENDS
I1.6IRRIGATION DETAILS AND WELO
A3.13PERSPECTIVE VIEWS
A3.14PERSPECTIVE VIEWS
A3.15PERSPECTIVE VIEWS
A3.16PERSPECTIVE VIEWS
I1.5IRRIGATION DETAILS
I1.4IRRIGATION DETAILS
I1.3IRRIGATION DETAILS
Exhibit B
3 CY
BIN
3 CY
BIN
96 gal
96 gal
96 gal
64 gal
64 gal
64 gal
64 gal
64 gal
64 gal
96 gal
96 gal
96 gal
96 gal
96 gal
96 gal
96 gal
96 gal
96 gal
64 gal
64 gal
64 gal
3 CY
BIN
3 CY
BIN
WASHER /
DRYER
WASHER /
DRYER
WASHER /
DRYER
WASHER /
DRYER
96 gal
96 gal
96 gal
64 gal
64 gal
64 gal
64 gal
64 gal
64 gal
96 gal
96 gal
96 gal
96 gal
96 gal
96 gal
96 gal
96 gal
96 gal
64 gal
64 gal
64 gal
64 gal
96 gal
96 gal
96 gal
GROUND LEVEL
OPEN SPACE
3,391 SQ. FT.
74'-7"
39'-5"
10'-8"
9'-0"
27'-5"
54'-10"
ROOF DECK
4,488 SQ. FT.
33'-8"25'-10"
44'-6"6'-8" 52'-2"
33'-8"
3 CY
BIN
3 CY
BIN
96 gal
96 gal
96 gal
64 gal
64 gal
64 gal
64 gal
64 gal
64 gal
96 gal
96 gal
96 gal
96 gal
96 gal
96 gal
96 gal
96 gal
96 gal
64 gal
64 gal
64 gal
ZONING DATA
A0.1
ZONING CODE DATA
LEVEL 1
REFUSE AND RECYCLING
N.T.S.
N
ZONING MAP
PROJECT SITE
3000 SHATTUCK
ROOF LEVEL
OPEN SPACE DIAGRAMS
3000
SHATTUCK
ALL DRAWINGS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL APPEARING
HEREIN CONSTITUTE ORIGINAL AND UNPUBLISHED
WORK OF THE ARCHITECT AND MAY NOT BE
DUPLICATED, USED OR DISCLOSED WITHOUT WRITTEN
CONSENT OF TRACHTENBERG ARCHITECTS.
2104 JOB:
SHEET:
2421 Fourth Street
Berkeley, California 94710
510.649.1414
www.TrachtenbergArch.com
TRACHTENBERG
ARCHITECTS
03.15.2022 ZONING APPLICATION
3000 Shattuck Ave
Berkeley, CA
07.08.2022 ZONING RESUBMITTAL
01.19.2023 DRC HEARING SET
01.20.2023 LOADING ZONE PLAN
05.11.2023 ZAB HEARING SET
LONG TERM BIKE PARKING
WASHER /
DRYER
WASHER /
DRYER
WASHER /
DRYER
REF 18"
DW
WASHER /
DRYER
REF 18"
DW
WASHER /
DRYER
REF18"
DW
WASHER /
DRYER
REF18"
DW
WASHER /
DRYER
REF18"
DW
WASHER /
DRYER
REF18"
DW
WASHER /
DRYER
REF18"
DW
WASHER /
DRYER
REF18"
DW
WASHER /
DRYER
REF18"
DW
WASHER /
DRYER
WASHER /
DRYER
WASHER /
DRYER
WASHER /
DRYER
WASHER /
DRYER
WASHER /
DRYER
WASHER /
DRYER
3 CY
BIN
3 CY
BIN
WASHER /
DRYER
WASHER /
DRYER
WASHER /
DRYER
WASHER /
DRYER
96 gal
96 gal
96 gal
64 gal
64 gal
64 gal
64 gal
64 gal
64 gal
96 gal
96 gal
96 gal
96 gal
96 gal
96 gal
96 gal
96 gal
96 gal
64 gal
64 gal
64 gal
64 gal
96 gal
96 gal
96 gal
17'-4" 10'-4" 10'-4" 10'-4" 10'-4" 10'-4" 10'-4" 10'-4" 10'-4" 14'-10" 110'-4"
113'-10"
ELEVATORS
10'-4"
WASHER /
DRYER
WASHER /
DRYER
WASHER /
DRYER
WASHER /
DRYER
WASHER /
DRYER
WASHER /
DRYER
WASHER /
DRYER
WASHER /
DRYER
WASHER /
DRYER
WASHER /
DRYER
WASHER /
DRYER
WASHER /
DRYER
WASHER /
DRYER
WASHER /
DRYER
WASHER /
DRYER
WASHER /
DRYER
WASHER /
DRYER
WASHER /
DRYER
PROPOSED DENSITY BONUS PROJECT
DENSITY BONUS
DIAGRAMS
A0.3A
PLAN AT GROUND PLAN AT LEVELS 3-10
3000
SHATTUCK
ALL DRAWINGS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL APPEARING
HEREIN CONSTITUTE ORIGINAL AND UNPUBLISHED
WORK OF THE ARCHITECT AND MAY NOT BE
DUPLICATED, USED OR DISCLOSED WITHOUT WRITTEN
CONSENT OF TRACHTENBERG ARCHITECTS.
2104 JOB:
SHEET:
2421 Fourth Street
Berkeley, California 94710
510.649.1414
www.TrachtenbergArch.com
TRACHTENBERG
ARCHITECTS
03.15.2022 ZONING APPLICATION
3000 Shattuck Ave
Berkeley, CA
07.08.2022 ZONING RESUBMITTAL
01.19.2023 DRC HEARING SET
01.20.2023 LOADING ZONE PLAN
05.11.2023 ZAB HEARING SET
DENSITY BONUS DIAGRAM AREA KEY
RESIDENTIAL AREA
COMMERCIAL AREA
PLAN AT ROOFPLAN AT LEVELS 2
12345678
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 21
20 SETBACKS
ALLOWED TO
BE MODIFIED
WITH UP, TYP.
3,460 SF
OPEN SPACE
SETBACKS
ALLOWED TO
BE MODIFIED
WITH UP, TYP.
SETBACKS
ALLOWED TO
BE MODIFIED
WITH UP, TYP.
SETBACKS
ALLOWED TO
BE MODIFIED
WITH UP, TYP.1234
6 5
1108 SF
38'-0"
ROOF DECK
1095 SF
UNOCCUPIED
ROOF
GRADE AT ASHBY SIDEWALK
13'-4" 10'-4"
65'-0"
10'-4" 10'-4" 10'-4" 10'-4"
ELEVATORS
DENSITY BONUS
CALCULATIONS
A0.3B
3000
SHATTUCK
ALL DRAWINGS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL APPEARING
HEREIN CONSTITUTE ORIGINAL AND UNPUBLISHED
WORK OF THE ARCHITECT AND MAY NOT BE
DUPLICATED, USED OR DISCLOSED WITHOUT WRITTEN
CONSENT OF TRACHTENBERG ARCHITECTS.
2104 JOB:
SHEET:
2421 Fourth Street
Berkeley, California 94710
510.649.1414
www.TrachtenbergArch.com
TRACHTENBERG
ARCHITECTS
03.15.2022 ZONING APPLICATION
3000 Shattuck Ave
Berkeley, CA
07.08.2022 ZONING RESUBMITTAL
01.19.2023 DRC HEARING SET
01.20.2023 LOADING ZONE PLAN
05.11.2023 ZAB HEARING SET
BASE PROJECT
PLAN AT GROUND
PLAN AT LEVELS 2-6
PLAN AT ROOF
2999
RESIDENTIAL
2111
RESIDENTIAL
2971
COMMERCIAL
2921
RESIDENTIAL
2113
RESIDENTIAL
BUILDING
SHATTUCK AVE
ASHBY AVE
NEWBURY ST
EMERSON ST
PROPOSED
PROPOSED
BUILDING
SHATTUCK AVE
ASHBY AVE
NEWBURY ST
2996
COMMERCIAL
2930
COMMERCIAL
2996
COMMERCIAL
2051
COMMERCIAL
2916
RESIDENTIAL
2918
RESIDENTIAL
2920
RESIDENTIAL
2923
RESIDENTIAL
PROPOSED
BUILDING
SHATTUCK AVE
ASHBY AVE
NEWBURY ST
ASHBY AVE
2999
RESIDENTIAL
SHATTUCK AVE
2111
RESIDENTIAL
2113
RESIDENTIAL
2115
RESIDENTIAL
2117
RESIDENTIAL
2928
RESIDENTIAL
2925
COMMERCIAL
2930
COMMERCIAL
2927
COMMERCIAL
2051
COMMERCIAL
2996
COMMERCIAL
2921
RESIDENTIAL
2923
RESIDENTIAL
3001
COMMERCIAL
2110
RESIDENTIAL
2112
RESIDENTIAL
2118
RESIDENTIAL
3007
RESIDENTIAL
3011
RESIDENTIAL
2103
RESIDENTIAL
2109
RESIDENTIAL
2111
RESIDENTIAL
2121
RESIDENTIAL
2129
RESIDENTIAL
2137
RESIDENTIAL
2119
RESIDENTIAL
2916
RESIDENTIAL
2918
RESIDENTIAL
2920
RESIDENTIAL
2047
RESIDENTIAL
2041
RESIDENTIAL
2043
RESIDENTIAL
2035
RESIDENTIAL
2076
RESIDENTIAL 2040
RESIDENTIAL
2034
RESIDENTIAL
2030
RESIDENTIAL
3010
RESIDENTIAL
2024
RESIDENTIAL
2045
RESIDENTIAL
2075
RESIDENTIAL
3014
COMMERCIAL
2071
RESIDENTIAL
2065
RESIDENTIAL
2071
RESIDENTIAL
2971
RESIDENTIAL
NEWBURY ST
PROPOSED
BUILDING
ASHBY AVE
2999
RESIDENTIAL
SHATTUCK AVE
2111
RESIDENTIAL
2113
RESIDENTIAL
2115
RESIDENTIAL
2117
RESIDENTIAL
2928
RESIDENTIAL
2925
COMMERCIAL
2930
COMMERCIAL
2927
COMMERCIAL
2051
COMMERCIAL
2996
COMMERCIAL
2921
RESIDENTIAL
2923
RESIDENTIAL
3001
COMMERCIAL
2110
RESIDENTIAL
2112
RESIDENTIAL
2118
RESIDENTIAL
3007
RESIDENTIAL
3011
RESIDENTIAL
2103
RESIDENTIAL
2109
RESIDENTIAL
2111
RESIDENTIAL
2121
RESIDENTIAL
2129
RESIDENTIAL
2137
RESIDENTIAL
2119
RESIDENTIAL
2916
RESIDENTIAL
2918
RESIDENTIAL
2920
RESIDENTIAL
2047
RESIDENTIAL
2041
RESIDENTIAL
2043
RESIDENTIAL
2035
RESIDENTIAL
2076
RESIDENTIAL 2040
RESIDENTIAL
2034
RESIDENTIAL
2030
RESIDENTIAL
3010
RESIDENTIAL
2024
RESIDENTIAL
2045
RESIDENTIAL
2075
RESIDENTIAL
3014
COMMERCIAL
2071
RESIDENTIAL
2065
RESIDENTIAL
2071
RESIDENTIAL
2971
RESIDENTIAL
NEWBURY ST
PROPOSED
BUILDING
2921
RESIDENTIAL
NEW SHADOWS CAST ONEXISTING RESIDENTIAL
ASHBY AVE
2999
RESIDENTIAL
SHATTUCK AVE
2111
RESIDENTIAL
2113
RESIDENTIAL
2115
RESIDENTIAL
2117
RESIDENTIAL
2928
RESIDENTIAL
2925
COMMERCIAL
2930
COMMERCIAL
2927
COMMERCIAL
2051
COMMERCIAL
2996
COMMERCIAL
2921
RESIDENTIAL
2923
RESIDENTIAL
3001
COMMERCIAL
2110
RESIDENTIAL
2112
RESIDENTIAL
2118
RESIDENTIAL
3007
RESIDENTIAL
3011
RESIDENTIAL
2111
RESIDENTIAL
2121
RESIDENTIAL
2129
RESIDENTIAL
2137
RESIDENTIAL
2119
RESIDENTIAL
2916
RESIDENTIAL
2918
RESIDENTIAL
2920
RESIDENTIAL
2047
RESIDENTIAL
2041
RESIDENTIAL
2043
RESIDENTIAL
2035
RESIDENTIAL
2076
RESIDENTIAL 2040
RESIDENTIAL
2034
RESIDENTIAL
2030
RESIDENTIAL
3010
RESIDENTIAL
2024
RESIDENTIAL2071
RESIDENTIAL
2971
RESIDENTIAL
NEWBURY ST
PROPOSED
BUILDING
NEW SHADOWS CAST ON
EXISTING RESIDENTIAL
NEW SHADOWS CAST ONEXISTING RESIDENTIAL
LIGHTER TONE GREY INDICATES SHADOWS
FROM PROPOSED BUILDING
DARK TONE GREY INDICATES SHADOWS
FROM EXISTING BUILDINGS
ALL RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS BEING
SHADOWED SHOWN IN THESE DIAGRAMS
NEW SHADOW AT RESIDENTIAL BUILDING
LIGHTER TONE GREY INDICATES SHADOWS
FROM PROPOSED BUILDING
DARK TONE GREY INDICATES SHADOWS
FROM EXISTING BUILDINGS
ALL RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS BEING
SHADOWED SHOWN IN THESE DIAGRAMS
NEW SHADOW AT RESIDENTIAL BUILDING
LIGHTER TONE GREY INDICATES SHADOWS
FROM PROPOSED BUILDING
DARK TONE GREY INDICATES SHADOWS
FROM EXISTING BUILDINGS
ALL RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS BEING
SHADOWED SHOWN IN THESE DIAGRAMS
NEW SHADOW AT RESIDENTIAL BUILDING
3000
SHATTUCK
ALL DRAWINGS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL APPEARING
HEREIN CONSTITUTE ORIGINAL AND UNPUBLISHED
WORK OF THE ARCHITECT AND MAY NOT BE
DUPLICATED, USED OR DISCLOSED WITHOUT WRITTEN
CONSENT OF TRACHTENBERG ARCHITECTS.
2104 JOB:
SHEET:
2421 Fourth Street
Berkeley, California 94710
510.649.1414
www.TrachtenbergArch.com
TRACHTENBERG
ARCHITECTS
03.15.2022 ZONING APPLICATION
3000 Shattuck Ave
Berkeley, CA
07.08.2022 ZONING RESUBMITTAL
01.19.2023 DRC HEARING SET
01.20.2023 LOADING ZONE PLAN
05.11.2023 ZAB HEARING SET
SHADOW STUDIES
DECEMBER 21ST
A0.4A
N
WINTER SOLSTICE
DEC 21ST:
2-HRS BEFORE SUNSET (PM)
WINTER SOLSTICE
DEC 21ST:
NOON
WINTER SOLSTICE
DEC 21ST:
2-HRS AFTER SUNRISE (AM)
3SHADOW STUDY - NOON
1:160 @ 11X17 1:80 @ 24X36
5SHADOW STUDY - PM
1:160 @ 11X17 1:80 @ 24X36
1SHADOW STUDY - AM
1:160 @ 11X17 1:80 @ 24X36
2SHADOW STUDY AXONOMETRIC - AM
N.T.S.
4SHADOW STUDY AXONOMETRIC - NOON
NT.S.
6SHADOW STUDY AXONOMETRIC - PM
N.T.S.
N
N
LIGHTER TONE GREY INDICATES SHADOWS
FROM PROPOSED BUILDING
DARK TONE GREY INDICATES SHADOWS
FROM EXISTING BUILDINGS
ALL RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS BEING
SHADOWED SHOWN IN THESE DIAGRAMS
NEW SHADOW AT RESIDENTIAL BUILDING
ASHBY AVE
2999
RESIDENTIAL
SHATTUCK AVE
2111
RESIDENTIAL
2113
RESIDENTIAL
2115
RESIDENTIAL
2117
RESIDENTIAL
2925
COMMERCIAL
2930RESIDENTIAL
2927
COMMERCIAL
2051
COMMERCIAL
2996
COMMERCIAL
RESIDENTIAL
3001
COMMERCIAL
2110
RESIDENTIAL
2112
RESIDENTIAL
2118
RESIDENTIAL
3007
RESIDENTIAL
3011
RESIDENTIAL
2103
RESIDENTIAL
2109
RESIDENTIAL
2111
RESIDENTIAL
2121
RESIDENTIAL
2129
RESIDENTIAL
2137
RESIDENTIAL
2119
RESIDENTIAL
2918
RESIDENTIAL
2920
RESIDENTIAL
2047
RESIDENTIAL
2041
RESIDENTIAL
2043
RESIDENTIAL
2035
RESIDENTIAL
2076
RESIDENTIAL
2040
RESIDENTIAL
2034
RESIDENTIAL
2030
RESIDENTIAL
1214
RESIDENTIAL
1214
RESIDENTIAL
3104
RESIDENTIAL
3010
RESIDENTIAL
PROPOSED
BUILDING
ASHBY AVE
2999
RESIDENTIAL
SHATTUCK AVE
2111
RESIDENTIAL
2113
RESIDENTIAL
2115
RESIDENTIAL
2117
RESIDENTIAL
2930RESIDENTIAL
2927
COMMERCIAL
2051
COMMERCIAL
2996
COMMERCIAL
3001
COMMERCIAL
2110
RESIDENTIAL
2112
RESIDENTIAL
2118
RESIDENTIAL
3007
RESIDENTIAL
3011
RESIDENTIAL
2103
RESIDENTIAL
2109
RESIDENTIAL
2111
RESIDENTIAL
2121
RESIDENTIAL
2129
RESIDENTIAL
2137
RESIDENTIAL
2119
RESIDENTIAL
2918
RESIDENTIAL
2920
RESIDENTIAL
2047
RESIDENTIAL
2041
RESIDENTIAL
2043
RESIDENTIAL
2076
RESIDENTIAL
2040
RESIDENTIAL
2034
RESIDENTIAL
2030
RESIDENTIAL
1214
RESIDENTIAL
1214
RESIDENTIAL
3104
RESIDENTIAL
3010
RESIDENTIAL
PROPOSED
BUILDING
ASHBY AVE
2999
RESIDENTIAL
SHATTUCK AVE
2111
RESIDENTIAL
2113
RESIDENTIAL
2115
RESIDENTIAL
2117
RESIDENTIAL
COMMERCIAL
2930RESIDENTIAL
2927
COMMERCIAL
2051
COMMERCIAL
2996
COMMERCIAL
3001
COMMERCIAL
2110
RESIDENTIAL
2112
RESIDENTIAL
2118
RESIDENTIAL
3007
RESIDENTIAL
3011
RESIDENTIAL
2103
RESIDENTIAL
2109
RESIDENTIAL
2111
RESIDENTIAL
2121
RESIDENTIAL
2129
RESIDENTIAL
2137
RESIDENTIAL
2119
RESIDENTIAL
2918
RESIDENTIAL
2920
RESIDENTIAL
2047
RESIDENTIAL
2041
RESIDENTIAL
2043
RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL
2076
RESIDENTIAL
2040
RESIDENTIAL
2034
RESIDENTIAL
2030
RESIDENTIAL
1214
RESIDENTIAL
1214
RESIDENTIAL
3104
RESIDENTIAL
3010
RESIDENTIAL
PROPOSED
BUILDING
3001
COMMERCIAL
2110
RESIDENTIAL
2112
RESIDENTIAL
2118
RESIDENTIAL
3007
RESIDENTIAL
3011
RESIDENTIAL
2103
RESIDENTIAL
2109
RESIDENTIAL
2111
RESIDENTIAL
2121
RESIDENTIAL
2129
RESIDENTIAL
2119
RESIDENTIAL
(N) SHADOW ON
LIVING ROOMS
(N) SHADOW ON
BEDROOMS
(N) SHADOW ON
BEDROOMS
(N) SHADOW ON
BEDROOMS
(N) SHADOW ON
BEDROOMS
(N) SHADOW ON
BEDROOMS
(N) SHADOW ON
LIVING ROOMS
(N) SHADOW ON
BEDROOMS
2076
RESIDENTIAL
2040
RESIDENTIAL
2034
RESIDENTIAL
2030
RESIDENTIAL
2071
RESIDENTIAL
2075
RESIDENTIAL
2045
RESIDENTIAL
PROPOSED
BUILDING
(N) SHADOW ON
BEDROOMS(N) SHADOW ON
BEDROOMS
(N) SHADOW ON
BEDROOMS
3000
SHATTUCK
ALL DRAWINGS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL APPEARING
HEREIN CONSTITUTE ORIGINAL AND UNPUBLISHED
WORK OF THE ARCHITECT AND MAY NOT BE
DUPLICATED, USED OR DISCLOSED WITHOUT WRITTEN
CONSENT OF TRACHTENBERG ARCHITECTS.
2104 JOB:
SHEET:
03.15.2022 ZONING APPLICATION
3000 Shattuck Ave
Berkeley, CA
07.08.22 ZONING INCOMPLETE RESPONSE
SHADOW STUDIES
JUNE 21ST
A0.4B
2SHADOW STUDY - JUNE 21: 2 HRS AFTER SUNRISE
1:130 @ 11X17 1:65 @ 24X36
3SHADOW STUDY - JUNE 21: NOON
1:130 @ 11X17 1:65 @ 24X36
1SHADOW STUDY - JUNE 21: 2-HRS BEFORE SUNSET
1:130 @ 11X17 1:65 @ 24X36
4SHADOW STUDY AXONOMETRIC - JUN 21: 2-HRS BEFORE SUNSET NTS
5SHADOW STUDY AXONOMETRIC - JUNE 21: 2-HRS AFTER SUNRISE NTS
LIGHTER TONE GREY INDICATES SHADOWS
FROM PROPOSED BUILDING
DARK TONE GREY INDICATES SHADOWS
FROM EXISTING BUILDINGS
ALL RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS BEING
SHADOWED SHOWN IN THESE DIAGRAMS
NEW SHADOW AT RESIDENTIAL BUILDING
ASHBY AVE
2999
RESIDENTIAL
SHATTUCK AVE
2111
RESIDENTIAL
2113
RESIDENTIAL
2115
RESIDENTIAL
2117
RESIDENTIAL
2925
COMMERCIAL
2930RESIDENTIAL
2927
COMMERCIAL
2051
COMMERCIAL
2996
COMMERCIAL
RESIDENTIAL
3001
COMMERCIAL
2110
RESIDENTIAL
2112
RESIDENTIAL
2118
RESIDENTIAL
3007
RESIDENTIAL
3011
RESIDENTIAL
2103
RESIDENTIAL
2109
RESIDENTIAL
2111
RESIDENTIAL
2121
RESIDENTIAL
2129
RESIDENTIAL
2119
RESIDENTIAL
2918
RESIDENTIAL
2920
RESIDENTIAL
2047
RESIDENTIAL
2041
RESIDENTIAL
2043
RESIDENTIAL
2035
RESIDENTIAL
2076
RESIDENTIAL
2040
RESIDENTIAL
2034
RESIDENTIAL
2030
RESIDENTIAL
1214
RESIDENTIAL
1214
RESIDENTIAL
3104
RESIDENTIAL
3010
RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL
PROPOSED
BUILDING
ASHBY AVE
2999
RESIDENTIAL
SHATTUCK AVE
2111
RESIDENTIAL
2113
RESIDENTIAL
2115
RESIDENTIAL
2117
RESIDENTIAL
2925
COMMERCIAL
2930RESIDENTIAL
2927
COMMERCIAL
2051
COMMERCIAL
2996
COMMERCIAL
2923
RESIDENTIAL
3001
COMMERCIAL
2110
RESIDENTIAL
2112
RESIDENTIAL
2118
RESIDENTIAL
3007
RESIDENTIAL
3011
RESIDENTIAL
2103
RESIDENTIAL
2109
RESIDENTIAL
2111
RESIDENTIAL
2121
RESIDENTIAL
2129
RESIDENTIAL
2119
RESIDENTIAL
2918
RESIDENTIAL
2920
RESIDENTIAL
2047
RESIDENTIAL
2041
RESIDENTIAL
2043
RESIDENTIAL
2035
RESIDENTIAL
2076
RESIDENTIAL
2040
RESIDENTIAL
2034
RESIDENTIAL
2030
RESIDENTIAL
1214
RESIDENTIAL
3010
RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL
PROPOSED
BUILDING
PROPOSED
BUILDING
ASHBY AVE
2999
RESIDENTIAL
SHATTUCK AVE
2111
RESIDENTIAL
2113
RESIDENTIAL
2115
RESIDENTIAL
2117
RESIDENTIAL
2927
COMMERCIAL
2051
COMMERCIAL
2996
COMMERCIAL
3001
COMMERCIAL
2110
RESIDENTIAL
2112
RESIDENTIALRESIDENTIAL
3007
RESIDENTIAL
3011
RESIDENTIAL
2103
RESIDENTIAL
2109
RESIDENTIAL
2111
RESIDENTIAL
2121
RESIDENTIAL
2129
RESIDENTIAL
2119
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
2920
RESIDENTIAL
2047
RESIDENTIAL
2041
RESIDENTIAL
2043
RESIDENTIAL
2035
RESIDENTIAL
2076
RESIDENTIAL
2040
RESIDENTIAL
2034
RESIDENTIAL
2030
RESIDENTIAL
1214
RESIDENTIAL
1214
RESIDENTIAL
3104
RESIDENTIAL
3010
RESIDENTIAL
2024
RESIDENTIAL
3001
COMMERCIAL
2110
RESIDENTIAL
2112
RESIDENTIAL
2118
RESIDENTIAL
3007
RESIDENTIAL
3011
RESIDENTIAL
2103
RESIDENTIAL
2109
RESIDENTIAL
2111
RESIDENTIAL
2121
RESIDENTIAL
2129
RESIDENTIAL
2119
RESIDENTIAL
(N) SHADOW ON
LIVING ROOMS
(N) SHADOW ON
BEDROOMS
(N) SHADOW ON
BEDROOMS
(N) SHADOW ON
BEDROOMS
(N) SHADOW ON
BEDROOMS
(N) SHADOW ON
BEDROOMS
(N) SHADOW ON
LIVING ROOMS
(N) SHADOW ON
BEDROOMS
2076
RESIDENTIAL
2040
RESIDENTIAL
2034
RESIDENTIAL
2030
RESIDENTIAL
2071
RESIDENTIAL 2075
RESIDENTIAL
2045
RESIDENTIAL
PROPOSED
BUILDING
(N) SHADOW ON
BEDROOMS
(N) SHADOW ON
BEDROOMS
(N) SHADOW ON
BEDROOMS
3000
SHATTUCK
ALL DRAWINGS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL APPEARING
HEREIN CONSTITUTE ORIGINAL AND UNPUBLISHED
WORK OF THE ARCHITECT AND MAY NOT BE
DUPLICATED, USED OR DISCLOSED WITHOUT WRITTEN
CONSENT OF TRACHTENBERG ARCHITECTS.
2104 JOB:
SHEET:
03.15.2022 ZONING APPLICATION
3000 Shattuck Ave
Berkeley, CA
07.08.22 ZONING INCOMPLETE RESPONSE
SHADOW STUDIES
JULY 8TH
A0.4C
2SHADOW STUDY - JULY 8: 2 HRS AFTER SUNRISE
1:130 @ 11X17 1:65 @ 24X36
3SHADOW STUDY - JULY 8: NOON
1:130 @ 11X17 1:65 @ 24X36
1SHADOW STUDY - JULY 8: 2-HRS BEFORE SUNSET
1:130 @ 11X17 1:65 @ 24X36
4SHADOW STUDY AXONOMETRIC - JULY 8: 2-HRS BEFORE SUNSET NTS
5SHADOW STUDY AXONOMETRIC - JULY 8: 2 HRS AFTER SUNRISE 1:100 @ 11X17 1:50 @ 24X36
SITE CONTEXT
PHOTOS
A0.5
1 -
GOOGLE EARTH BIRD'S EYE CONTEXT VIEW 3
-
VIEW FROM SHATTUCK LOOKING NORTH
4 -
VIEW FROM SHATTUCK LOOKING SOUTH2
-
VIEW FROM ASHBY LOOKING WEST
3000
SHATTUCK
ALL DRAWINGS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL APPEARING
HEREIN CONSTITUTE ORIGINAL AND UNPUBLISHED
WORK OF THE ARCHITECT AND MAY NOT BE
DUPLICATED, USED OR DISCLOSED WITHOUT WRITTEN
CONSENT OF TRACHTENBERG ARCHITECTS.
2104 JOB:
SHEET:
03.15.2022 ZONING APPLICATION
3000 Shattuck Ave
Berkeley, CA
07.08.22 ZONING INCOMPLETE RESPONSE
3000 SHATTUCK
PROJECT SITE
2076 SHATTUCK
(3-STORY MULTIFAMILY)
2999 SHATTUCK
(3-STORY MIXED-USE)
3001 SHATTUCK
(1-STORY COMMERCIAL)
2999 SHATTUCK
(1-STORY COMMERCIAL)
3014 SHTTUCK
(3-STORY
RESIDENTIAL)
3010 SHTTUCK
(2-STORY
RESIDENTIAL)
2076 SHATTUCK
(3-STORY MULTIFAMILY)
2999 SHATTUCK
(3-STORY MULTIFAMILY)
3011 SHATTUCK
(2-STORY RESIDENTIAL)
3011 SHATTUCK
(2-STORY MIXED-USE) 3000 SHATTUCK
PROJECT SITE
3001 SHATTUCK
(1-STORY COMMERCIAL) 3000 SHATTUCK
PROJECT SITE
2076 SHATTUCK
(3-STORY MULTIFAMILY)
2999 SHATTUCK
(3-STORY MIXED USE)
2971 SHATTUCK
(1-STORY COMMERCIAL)
2929 SHATTUCK
(1-STORY COMMERCIAL)
3000 SHATTUCK
PROJECT SITE
PROJECT SITE
3000 SHATTUCK
3000
ASHBY AVE.
SHATTUCK AVE.
3001
3008
3010
3014
3007
3011
210321092111
2121
2075
2071
2057
2045
2037
2033
2025
2021
2076
2040
2034
2030
2024
2024
2016
2996
2999
2930
2925
2921
2917
2915
2911
2913
2917
2921
2923
2927
2051
2047
2043
2041
2918
2916
2914
2912
2910
2906
2920
2111
21132115
2117
2110
2112
2118
2124
2048
2044
2036 2030
2022
20562064
2070
2080
3020
3022
3026
3021
3023
3025
2118
212221262132
2121
2121
2021
2021
3021
3023
2909
2903
2911
2917
2923
2001
2004
2928
2926
2922
2916
VICINITY MAP
A0.6
1 -
VICINITY MAP
NTS
N
3000
SHATTUCK
ALL DRAWINGS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL APPEARING
HEREIN CONSTITUTE ORIGINAL AND UNPUBLISHED
WORK OF THE ARCHITECT AND MAY NOT BE
DUPLICATED, USED OR DISCLOSED WITHOUT WRITTEN
CONSENT OF TRACHTENBERG ARCHITECTS.
2104 JOB:
SHEET:
03.15.2022 ZONING APPLICATION
3000 Shattuck Ave
Berkeley, CA
07.08.22 ZONING INCOMPLETE RESPONSE
3000
SHATTUCK
ALL DRAWINGS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL APPEARING
HEREIN CONSTITUTE ORIGINAL AND UNPUBLISHED
WORK OF THE ARCHITECT AND MAY NOT BE
DUPLICATED, USED OR DISCLOSED WITHOUT WRITTEN
CONSENT OF TRACHTENBERG ARCHITECTS.
2104 JOB:
SHEET:
03.15.2022 ZONING APPLICATION
3000 Shattuck Ave
Berkeley, CA
07.08.22 ZONING INCOMPLETE RESPONSE
SURVEY /
EXISTING CONDITIONS
A1.1
1 -
SURVEY / EXISTING CONDITIONS
3/64" = 1'-0" @ 24X36 3/32' = 1'-0" @ 11X17
WASHER /
DRYER
WASHER /
DRYER
5'-7"
11'-3" 75'-6" 35'-0" 3'-2"
104'-4"
124'-11"
36'-6"10'-8"52'-8"11'-3"
124'-11"
112'-1"
39'-4"63'-8"
104'-11"
PROPERTY LINE
PROPERTY LINE
PROPERTY LINE
PROPERTY LINE
29'-6" 4'-6" 20'-6" 9'-0"2'-6"
2'-2"
10'-8"
110'-6"
WASHER /
DRYER
WASHER /
DRYER
WASHER /
DRYER
WASHER /
DRYER
WASHER /
DRYER
WASHER /
DRYER
WASHER /
DRYER
WASHER /
DRYER
WASHER /
DRYER
WASHER /
DRYER
WASHER /
DRYER
WASHER /
DRYER
WASHER /
DRYER
WASHER /
DRYER
WASHER /
DRYER
WASHER /
DRYER
3000
SHATTUCK
ALL DRAWINGS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL APPEARING
HEREIN CONSTITUTE ORIGINAL AND UNPUBLISHED
WORK OF THE ARCHITECT AND MAY NOT BE
DUPLICATED, USED OR DISCLOSED WITHOUT WRITTEN
CONSENT OF TRACHTENBERG ARCHITECTS.
2104 JOB:
SHEET:
2421 Fourth Street
Berkeley, California 94710
510.649.1414
www.TrachtenbergArch.com
TRACHTENBERG
ARCHITECTS
03.15.2022 ZONING APPLICATION
3000 Shattuck Ave
Berkeley, CA
07.08.2022 ZONING RESUBMITTAL
01.19.2023 DRC HEARING SET
01.20.2023 LOADING ZONE PLAN
05.11.2023 ZAB HEARING SET
PLAN AT
LEVEL 2
A2.2
1 -
PLAN AT LEVEL 2
1/8" = 1'-0" @ 24X361/16" = 1'-0" @ 11X17
5'-7"
11'-3" 75'-6" 35'-0" 3'-2"
104'-4"
124'-11"
38'-0"10'-8"52'-8"11'-3" 1'-8"
124'-11"
112'-1"
39'-6"65'-0"
104'-11"
PROPERTY LINE
PROPERTY LINE
PROPERTY LINE
PROPERTY LINE
31'-0" 4'-6" 20'-6" 9'-0"1'-0"
2'-2"
10'-8"
112'-0"
WASHER /
DRYER
WASHER /
DRYER
WASHER /
DRYER
REF 18"
DW
WASHER /
DRYER
REF 18"
DW
WASHER /
DRYER
REF18"
DW
WASHER /
DRYER
REF18"
DW
WASHER /
DRYER
REF
18"
DW
WASHER /
DRYER
REF
18"
DW
WASHER /
DRYER
REF
18"
DW
WASHER /
DRYER
REF
18"
DW
WASHER /
DRYER
REF
18"
DW
WASHER /
DRYER
WASHER /
DRYER
1'-8"
WASHER /
DRYER
WASHER /
DRYER
WASHER /
DRYER
WASHER /
DRYER
WASHER /
DRYER
3000
SHATTUCK
ALL DRAWINGS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL APPEARING
HEREIN CONSTITUTE ORIGINAL AND UNPUBLISHED
WORK OF THE ARCHITECT AND MAY NOT BE
DUPLICATED, USED OR DISCLOSED WITHOUT WRITTEN
CONSENT OF TRACHTENBERG ARCHITECTS.
2104 JOB:
SHEET:
2421 Fourth Street
Berkeley, California 94710
510.649.1414
www.TrachtenbergArch.com
TRACHTENBERG
ARCHITECTS
03.15.2022 ZONING APPLICATION
3000 Shattuck Ave
Berkeley, CA
07.08.2022 ZONING RESUBMITTAL
01.19.2023 DRC HEARING SET
01.20.2023 LOADING ZONE PLAN
05.11.2023 ZAB HEARING SET
PLANS
FLOORS 3-10
A2.3
1 -
FLOORS 3-10 PLANS
1/8" = 1'-0" @ 24X361/16" = 1'-0" @ 11X17
PROPERTY LINE
PROPERTY LINE
PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE
UNOCCUPIED ROOF
POTENTIAL
LOCATION OF
SOLAR AREA
15% OF ROOF MIN.
POTENTIAL
LOCATION OF
EQUIPMENT
WCMECH
3000
SHATTUCK
ALL DRAWINGS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL APPEARING
HEREIN CONSTITUTE ORIGINAL AND UNPUBLISHED
WORK OF THE ARCHITECT AND MAY NOT BE
DUPLICATED, USED OR DISCLOSED WITHOUT WRITTEN
CONSENT OF TRACHTENBERG ARCHITECTS.
2104JOB:
SHEET:
2421 Fourth Street
Berkeley, California 94710
510.649.1414
www.TrachtenbergArch.com
TRACHTENBERG
ARCHITECTS
03.15.2022 ZONING APPLICATION
3000 Shattuck Ave
Berkeley, CA
07.08.2022 ZONING RESUBMITTAL
01.19.2023 DRC HEARING SET
01.20.2023 LOADING ZONE PLAN
05.11.2023 ZAB HEARING SET
PLAN AT
ROOF DECK LEVEL
A2.4
1 -
PLAN AT ROOF DECK LEVEL
1/8" = 1'-0" @ 24X36 1/16" = 1'-0" @ 11X17
+217
AVG. GRADE
LEVEL 2
LEVEL 3
LEVEL 4
LEVEL 5
LEVEL 6
LEVEL 7
17'-4"
110'-4"
10'-4"10'-4"10'-4"10'-4"10'-4"10'-4" 10'-4" 10'-4"
LEVEL 8
LEVEL 9
10'-6"
T.O. ELEV. ROOF
ROOF DECK
PARAPET
3'-6"10'-4"
LEVEL 10
BUILDING
ELEVATIONS
A3.1
1 -
EAST ELEVATION
1/16"=1'-0" @ 11X17 1/8" = 1'-0" @ 24X36
METAL INFILL
PANEL
INSULATED
METAL PANELSALUMINUM
WINDOWS
8 0416
3000
SHATTUCK
ALL DRAWINGS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL APPEARING
HEREIN CONSTITUTE ORIGINAL AND UNPUBLISHED
WORK OF THE ARCHITECT AND MAY NOT BE
DUPLICATED, USED OR DISCLOSED WITHOUT WRITTEN
CONSENT OF TRACHTENBERG ARCHITECTS.
2104 JOB:
SHEET:
2421 Fourth Street
Berkeley, California 94710
510.649.1414
www.TrachtenbergArch.com
TRACHTENBERG
ARCHITECTS
03.15.2022 ZONING APPLICATION
3000 Shattuck Ave
Berkeley, CA
07.08.2022 ZONING RESUBMITTAL
01.19.2023 DRC HEARING SET
01.20.2023 LOADING ZONE PLAN
05.11.2023 ZAB HEARING SET
DECORATIVE
METAL SCREEN
(ASHBY AVE.)
INSULATED
METAL PANELS
AVG. GRADE
LEVEL 2
LEVEL 3
LEVEL 4
LEVEL 5
LEVEL 6
LEVEL 7
17'-4"
110'-4"
10'-4"10'-4"10'-4"10'-4"10'-4"10'-4" 10'-4" 10'-4"
LEVEL 8
LEVEL 9
10'-6"
T.O. ELEV. ROOF
ROOF DECK
PARAPET
3'-6"10'-4"
LEVEL 10
BUILDING
ELEVATIONS
A3.2
1 -
NORTH ELEVATION
1/16"=1'-0" @ 11X17 1/8" = 1'-0" @ 24X36
ALUMINUM
WINDOWS
INSULATED
METAL PANELS
3000
SHATTUCK
ALL DRAWINGS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL APPEARING
HEREIN CONSTITUTE ORIGINAL AND UNPUBLISHED
WORK OF THE ARCHITECT AND MAY NOT BE
DUPLICATED, USED OR DISCLOSED WITHOUT WRITTEN
CONSENT OF TRACHTENBERG ARCHITECTS.
2104 JOB:
SHEET:
2421 Fourth Street
Berkeley, California 94710
510.649.1414
www.TrachtenbergArch.com
TRACHTENBERG
ARCHITECTS
03.15.2022 ZONING APPLICATION
3000 Shattuck Ave
Berkeley, CA
07.08.2022 ZONING RESUBMITTAL
01.19.2023 DRC HEARING SET
01.20.2023 LOADING ZONE PLAN
05.11.2023 ZAB HEARING SET
DECORATIVE
METAL SCREEN
METAL INFILL
PANELS
8 0416
(SHATTUCK AVE.)
AVG. GRADE
LEVEL 2
LEVEL 3
LEVEL 4
LEVEL 5
LEVEL 6
LEVEL 7
17'-4"
110'-4"
10'-4"10'-4"10'-4"10'-4"10'-4"10'-4" 10'-4" 10'-4"
LEVEL 8
LEVEL 9
10'-6"
T.O. ELEV. ROOF
ROOF DECK
PARAPET
3'-6"10'-4"
LEVEL 10
BUILDING
ELEVATIONS
A3.3
1 -
WEST ELEVATION
1/16"=1'-0" @ 11X17 1/8" = 1'-0" @ 24X36
METAL INFILL
PANEL
INSULATED
METAL PANELS
INSULATED
METAL PANELS
ALUMINUM
WINDOWS
3000
SHATTUCK
ALL DRAWINGS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL APPEARING
HEREIN CONSTITUTE ORIGINAL AND UNPUBLISHED
WORK OF THE ARCHITECT AND MAY NOT BE
DUPLICATED, USED OR DISCLOSED WITHOUT WRITTEN
CONSENT OF TRACHTENBERG ARCHITECTS.
2104 JOB:
SHEET:
2421 Fourth Street
Berkeley, California 94710
510.649.1414
www.TrachtenbergArch.com
TRACHTENBERG
ARCHITECTS
03.15.2022 ZONING APPLICATION
3000 Shattuck Ave
Berkeley, CA
07.08.2022 ZONING RESUBMITTAL
01.19.2023 DRC HEARING SET
01.20.2023 LOADING ZONE PLAN
05.11.2023 ZAB HEARING SET
8 0416
WOOD FENCE
(ASHBY AVE.)
DECORATIVE
METAL SCREEN
AVG. GRADE
LEVEL 2
LEVEL 3
LEVEL 4
LEVEL 5
LEVEL 6
LEVEL 7
17'-4"
110'-4"
10'-4"10'-4"10'-4"10'-4"10'-4"10'-4" 10'-4" 10'-4"
LEVEL 8
LEVEL 9
10'-6"
T.O. ELEV. ROOF
ROOF DECK
PARAPET
3'-6"10'-4"
LEVEL 10
BUILDING
ELEVATIONS
A3.4
1 -
SOUTH ELEVATION
1/16"=1'-0" @ 11X17 1/8" = 1'-0" @ 24X36
METAL INFILL
PANEL
INSULATED
METAL PANELS
ALUMINUM
WINDOWS
3000
SHATTUCK
ALL DRAWINGS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL APPEARING
HEREIN CONSTITUTE ORIGINAL AND UNPUBLISHED
WORK OF THE ARCHITECT AND MAY NOT BE
DUPLICATED, USED OR DISCLOSED WITHOUT WRITTEN
CONSENT OF TRACHTENBERG ARCHITECTS.
2104 JOB:
SHEET:
2421 Fourth Street
Berkeley, California 94710
510.649.1414
www.TrachtenbergArch.com
TRACHTENBERG
ARCHITECTS
03.15.2022 ZONING APPLICATION
3000 Shattuck Ave
Berkeley, CA
07.08.2022 ZONING RESUBMITTAL
01.19.2023 DRC HEARING SET
01.20.2023 LOADING ZONE PLAN
05.11.2023 ZAB HEARING SET
INSULATED
METAL PANELS
8 0416
WOOD FENCE
(SHATTUCK AVE.)
DECORATIVE
METAL SCREEN
2034 ASHBY
3001 SHATTUCK
(SHATTUCK AVE.)
2076 ASHBY2040 ASHBY
(EMERSON ST.)(ASHBY AVE.)
3014 SHATTUCK3010 SHATTUCK2996 SHATTUCK
STREET STRIP
ELEVATIONS
A3.5
2 -
STREET STRIP ELEVATION @ ASHBY AVENUE
1/32"=1'-0" @ 11X17 1/16" = 1'-0" @ 24X36
1 -
STREET STRIP ELEVATION @ SHATTUCK AVENUE
1/32"=1'-0" @ 11X17 1/16" = 1'-0" @ 24X36
0481632
0481632
3000
SHATTUCK
ALL DRAWINGS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL APPEARING
HEREIN CONSTITUTE ORIGINAL AND UNPUBLISHED
WORK OF THE ARCHITECT AND MAY NOT BE
DUPLICATED, USED OR DISCLOSED WITHOUT WRITTEN
CONSENT OF TRACHTENBERG ARCHITECTS.
2104 JOB:
SHEET:
2421 Fourth Street
Berkeley, California 94710
510.649.1414
www.TrachtenbergArch.com
TRACHTENBERG
ARCHITECTS
03.15.2022 ZONING APPLICATION
3000 Shattuck Ave
Berkeley, CA
07.08.2022 ZONING RESUBMITTAL
01.19.2023 DRC HEARING SET
01.20.2023 LOADING ZONE PLAN
05.11.2023 ZAB HEARING SET
PHOTO CONTEXT
VIEWS
A3.6 3
-
SHATTUCK LOOKING NORTH - BEFORE
4 -
SHATTUCK LOOKING NORTH - AFTER
3000
SHATTUCK
ALL DRAWINGS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL APPEARING
HEREIN CONSTITUTE ORIGINAL AND UNPUBLISHED
WORK OF THE ARCHITECT AND MAY NOT BE
DUPLICATED, USED OR DISCLOSED WITHOUT WRITTEN
CONSENT OF TRACHTENBERG ARCHITECTS.
2104 JOB:
SHEET:
2421 Fourth Street
Berkeley, California 94710
510.649.1414
www.TrachtenbergArch.com
TRACHTENBERG
ARCHITECTS
03.15.2022 ZONING APPLICATION
3000 Shattuck Ave
Berkeley, CA
07.08.2022 ZONING RESUBMITTAL
01.19.2023 DRC HEARING SET
01.20.2023 LOADING ZONE PLAN
05.11.2023 ZAB HEARING SET
1 -
SHATTUCK LOOKING SOUTH - BEFORE
2 -
SHATTUCK LOOKING SOUTH - AFTER
PHOTO CONTEXT
VIEWS
A3.7 3
-
ASHBY LOOKING EAST - BEFORE
4 -
ASHBY LOOKING EAST - AFTER
3000
SHATTUCK
ALL DRAWINGS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL APPEARING
HEREIN CONSTITUTE ORIGINAL AND UNPUBLISHED
WORK OF THE ARCHITECT AND MAY NOT BE
DUPLICATED, USED OR DISCLOSED WITHOUT WRITTEN
CONSENT OF TRACHTENBERG ARCHITECTS.
2104 JOB:
SHEET:
2421 Fourth Street
Berkeley, California 94710
510.649.1414
www.TrachtenbergArch.com
TRACHTENBERG
ARCHITECTS
03.15.2022 ZONING APPLICATION
3000 Shattuck Ave
Berkeley, CA
07.08.2022 ZONING RESUBMITTAL
01.19.2023 DRC HEARING SET
01.20.2023 LOADING ZONE PLAN
05.11.2023 ZAB HEARING SET
1 -
ASHBY LOOKING WEST - BEFORE
2 -
ASHBY LOOKING WEST - AFTER
PERSPECTIVE
VIEWS
A3.8 1
-
VIEW ALONG SHATTUCK LOOKING SOUTH WEST
3000
SHATTUCK
ALL DRAWINGS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL APPEARING
HEREIN CONSTITUTE ORIGINAL AND UNPUBLISHED
WORK OF THE ARCHITECT AND MAY NOT BE
DUPLICATED, USED OR DISCLOSED WITHOUT WRITTEN
CONSENT OF TRACHTENBERG ARCHITECTS.
2104 JOB:
SHEET:
2421 Fourth Street
Berkeley, California 94710
510.649.1414
www.TrachtenbergArch.com
TRACHTENBERG
ARCHITECTS
03.15.2022 ZONING APPLICATION
3000 Shattuck Ave
Berkeley, CA
07.08.2022 ZONING RESUBMITTAL
01.19.2023 DRC HEARING SET
01.20.2023 LOADING ZONE PLAN
05.11.2023 ZAB HEARING SET
PERSPECTIVE
VIEWS
A3.9 1
-
VIEW ALONG ASHBY LOOKING SOUTH WEST
3000
SHATTUCK
ALL DRAWINGS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL APPEARING
HEREIN CONSTITUTE ORIGINAL AND UNPUBLISHED
WORK OF THE ARCHITECT AND MAY NOT BE
DUPLICATED, USED OR DISCLOSED WITHOUT WRITTEN
CONSENT OF TRACHTENBERG ARCHITECTS.
2104 JOB:
SHEET:
2421 Fourth Street
Berkeley, California 94710
510.649.1414
www.TrachtenbergArch.com
TRACHTENBERG
ARCHITECTS
03.15.2022 ZONING APPLICATION
3000 Shattuck Ave
Berkeley, CA
07.08.2022 ZONING RESUBMITTAL
01.19.2023 DRC HEARING SET
01.20.2023 LOADING ZONE PLAN
05.11.2023 ZAB HEARING SET
PERSPECTIVE
VIEWS
A3.10 1
-
VIEW ALONG SHATTUCK LOOKING NORTH WEST
3000
SHATTUCK
ALL DRAWINGS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL APPEARING
HEREIN CONSTITUTE ORIGINAL AND UNPUBLISHED
WORK OF THE ARCHITECT AND MAY NOT BE
DUPLICATED, USED OR DISCLOSED WITHOUT WRITTEN
CONSENT OF TRACHTENBERG ARCHITECTS.
2104 JOB:
SHEET:
2421 Fourth Street
Berkeley, California 94710
510.649.1414
www.TrachtenbergArch.com
TRACHTENBERG
ARCHITECTS
03.15.2022 ZONING APPLICATION
3000 Shattuck Ave
Berkeley, CA
07.08.2022 ZONING RESUBMITTAL
01.19.2023 DRC HEARING SET
01.20.2023 LOADING ZONE PLAN
05.11.2023 ZAB HEARING SET
PERSPECTIVE
VIEWS
A3.11 1
-
VIEW ALONG ASHBY LOOKING EAST
3000
SHATTUCK
ALL DRAWINGS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL APPEARING
HEREIN CONSTITUTE ORIGINAL AND UNPUBLISHED
WORK OF THE ARCHITECT AND MAY NOT BE
DUPLICATED, USED OR DISCLOSED WITHOUT WRITTEN
CONSENT OF TRACHTENBERG ARCHITECTS.
2104 JOB:
SHEET:
2421 Fourth Street
Berkeley, California 94710
510.649.1414
www.TrachtenbergArch.com
TRACHTENBERG
ARCHITECTS
03.15.2022 ZONING APPLICATION
3000 Shattuck Ave
Berkeley, CA
07.08.2022 ZONING RESUBMITTAL
01.19.2023 DRC HEARING SET
01.20.2023 LOADING ZONE PLAN
05.11.2023 ZAB HEARING SET
PERSPECTIVE
VIEWS
A3.12 1
-
DETAIL AT SIDEWALK LEVEL
3000
SHATTUCK
ALL DRAWINGS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL APPEARING
HEREIN CONSTITUTE ORIGINAL AND UNPUBLISHED
WORK OF THE ARCHITECT AND MAY NOT BE
DUPLICATED, USED OR DISCLOSED WITHOUT WRITTEN
CONSENT OF TRACHTENBERG ARCHITECTS.
2104 JOB:
SHEET:
2421 Fourth Street
Berkeley, California 94710
510.649.1414
www.TrachtenbergArch.com
TRACHTENBERG
ARCHITECTS
03.15.2022 ZONING APPLICATION
3000 Shattuck Ave
Berkeley, CA
07.08.2022 ZONING RESUBMITTAL
01.19.2023 DRC HEARING SET
01.20.2023 LOADING ZONE PLAN
05.11.2023 ZAB HEARING SET
PERSPECTIVE
VIEWS
A3.13 1
-
RETAIL ENTRY CLOSE-UP VIEW
3000
SHATTUCK
ALL DRAWINGS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL APPEARING
HEREIN CONSTITUTE ORIGINAL AND UNPUBLISHED
WORK OF THE ARCHITECT AND MAY NOT BE
DUPLICATED, USED OR DISCLOSED WITHOUT WRITTEN
CONSENT OF TRACHTENBERG ARCHITECTS.
2104 JOB:
SHEET:
2421 Fourth Street
Berkeley, California 94710
510.649.1414
www.TrachtenbergArch.com
TRACHTENBERG
ARCHITECTS
03.15.2022 ZONING APPLICATION
3000 Shattuck Ave
Berkeley, CA
07.08.2022 ZONING RESUBMITTAL
01.19.2023 DRC HEARING SET
01.20.2023 LOADING ZONE PLAN
05.11.2023 ZAB HEARING SET
PERSPECTIVE
VIEWS
A3.14 1
-
DETAIL AT SIDEWALK LOOKING EAST
3000
SHATTUCK
ALL DRAWINGS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL APPEARING
HEREIN CONSTITUTE ORIGINAL AND UNPUBLISHED
WORK OF THE ARCHITECT AND MAY NOT BE
DUPLICATED, USED OR DISCLOSED WITHOUT WRITTEN
CONSENT OF TRACHTENBERG ARCHITECTS.
2104 JOB:
SHEET:
2421 Fourth Street
Berkeley, California 94710
510.649.1414
www.TrachtenbergArch.com
TRACHTENBERG
ARCHITECTS
03.15.2022 ZONING APPLICATION
3000 Shattuck Ave
Berkeley, CA
07.08.2022 ZONING RESUBMITTAL
01.19.2023 DRC HEARING SET
01.20.2023 LOADING ZONE PLAN
05.11.2023 ZAB HEARING SET
PERSPECTIVE
VIEWS
A3.15 1
-
DETAIL AT SIDEWALK LOOKING NORTHWEST
3000
SHATTUCK
ALL DRAWINGS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL APPEARING
HEREIN CONSTITUTE ORIGINAL AND UNPUBLISHED
WORK OF THE ARCHITECT AND MAY NOT BE
DUPLICATED, USED OR DISCLOSED WITHOUT WRITTEN
CONSENT OF TRACHTENBERG ARCHITECTS.
2104 JOB:
SHEET:
2421 Fourth Street
Berkeley, California 94710
510.649.1414
www.TrachtenbergArch.com
TRACHTENBERG
ARCHITECTS
03.15.2022 ZONING APPLICATION
3000 Shattuck Ave
Berkeley, CA
07.08.2022 ZONING RESUBMITTAL
01.19.2023 DRC HEARING SET
01.20.2023 LOADING ZONE PLAN
05.11.2023 ZAB HEARING SET
PERSPECTIVE
VIEWS
A3.16 1
-
LOBBY ENTRY CLOSE-UP VIEW
3000
SHATTUCK
ALL DRAWINGS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL APPEARING
HEREIN CONSTITUTE ORIGINAL AND UNPUBLISHED
WORK OF THE ARCHITECT AND MAY NOT BE
DUPLICATED, USED OR DISCLOSED WITHOUT WRITTEN
CONSENT OF TRACHTENBERG ARCHITECTS.
2104 JOB:
SHEET:
2421 Fourth Street
Berkeley, California 94710
510.649.1414
www.TrachtenbergArch.com
TRACHTENBERG
ARCHITECTS
03.15.2022 ZONING APPLICATION
3000 Shattuck Ave
Berkeley, CA
07.08.2022 ZONING RESUBMITTAL
01.19.2023 DRC HEARING SET
01.20.2023 LOADING ZONE PLAN
05.11.2023 ZAB HEARING SET
AVG. GRADE
LEVEL 2
LEVEL 3
LEVEL 4
LEVEL 5
LEVEL 6
LEVEL 7
17'-4"
110'-4"
10'-4"10'-4"10'-4"10'-4"10'-4"10'-4" 10'-4" 10'-4"
LEVEL 8
LEVEL 9
10'-6"
T.O. ELEV. ROOF
ROOF DECK
PARAPET
3'-6"10'-4"
LEVEL 10
BUILDING
MAT
MAT
1 -
NORTH ELEVATION
3/32"=1'-0" @ 11X17 3/16" = 1'-0" @ 24X36
METAL INFILL PANELINSULATED
METAL PANELS
3000
SHATTUCK
ALL DRAWINGS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL APPEARING
HEREIN CONSTITUTE ORIGINAL AND UNPUBLISHED
WORK OF THE ARCHITECT AND MAY NOT BE
DUPLICATED, USED OR DISCLOSED WITHOUT WRITTEN
CONSENT OF TRACHTENBERG ARCHITECTS.
2104 JOB:
SHEET:
2421 Fourth Street
Berkeley, California 94710
510.649.1414
www.TrachtenbergArch.com
TRACHTENBERG
ARCHITECTS
03.15.2022 ZONING APPLICATION
3000 Shattuck Ave
Berkeley, CA
07.08.2022 ZONING RESUBMITTAL
01.19.2023 DRC HEARING SET
01.20.2023 LOADING ZONE PLAN
05.11.2023 ZAB HEARING SET
INSULATED
METAL PANELS
8 0416
DECORATIVE
METAL SCREEN
ALUMINUM
WINDOWS
INSULATED
METAL PANELS
DECORATIVE
METAL SCREEN
METAL INFILL
PANELS
ROOF DECK BEYOND ELEVATORS
LOBBY
GRADE AT ASHBY SIDEWALK
SHATTUCK
AVG. GRADE
LEVEL 2
17'-4"
LEVEL 3
27'-8"
LEVEL 4
38'-0"
LEVEL 5
48'-4"
LEVEL 6
58'-8"
LEVEL 7
69'-0"
17'-4"
110'-4"
10'-4"10'-4"10'-4"10'-4"10'-4"10'-4" 10'-4" 10'-4"
LEVEL 8
79'-4"
LEVEL 10
89'-8"
110'-4"
T.O.ELEV. ROOF
124'-4"
10'-6"
ROOF DECK
CLUB ROOM
PL
GARDEN OPEN SPACE
PARAPET
3'-6"
113'-10"
2076 ASHBY
EXISTING MIXED-USE
10'-4"
LEVEL 9
100'-0"
PL PL
ALLOWABLE AWNING
PROJECTION INTO THE
RIGHT-OF-WAY PER CBC
SECTION 3202
4'-4"9'-0"
10'-1"
3000
SHATTUCK
ALL DRAWINGS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL APPEARING
HEREIN CONSTITUTE ORIGINAL AND UNPUBLISHED
WORK OF THE ARCHITECT AND MAY NOT BE
DUPLICATED, USED OR DISCLOSED WITHOUT WRITTEN
CONSENT OF TRACHTENBERG ARCHITECTS.
2104 JOB:
SHEET:
2421 Fourth Street
Berkeley, California 94710
510.649.1414
www.TrachtenbergArch.com
TRACHTENBERG
ARCHITECTS
03.15.2022 ZONING APPLICATION
3000 Shattuck Ave
Berkeley, CA
07.08.2022 ZONING RESUBMITTAL
01.19.2023 DRC HEARING SET
01.20.2023 LOADING ZONE PLAN
05.11.2023 ZAB HEARING SET
BUILDING SECTION
A4.1
1 -
E-W SECTION
1/8" = 1'-0" @ 24X361/16" = 1'-0" @ 11X17
ASHBY
+140' +139' +138'
+142'
+141.5'
+141'
FIRE WATER
STORAGE
BIKES (36)
STORAGE /
PACKAGES
OFFICE
+141.5'
+141.5'
TRASH
FIRE
COMMAND
CENTER
2 CY
BIN
2 CY
BIN
2 CY
BIN
2 CY
BIN
96 gal
96 gal
96 gal
96 gal
96 gal
96 gal
STOR.
BIKES (20)
CLUB ROOM
MAINT /
STO.
MECH
GENERATOR
ELEC.
FIRE
PUMP
BOOSTER
PUMP
WASHER /
DRYER
SHOWER
30"x60"
WASHER /
DRYER
SHOWER
30"x60"
WASHER /
DRYER
SHOWER
30"x60"
WASHER /
DRYER
SHOWER
30"x60"
3000
SHATTUCK
ALL DRAWINGS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL APPEARING
HEREIN CONSTITUTE ORIGINAL AND UNPUBLISHED
WORK OF THE ARCHITECT AND MAY NOT BE
DUPLICATED, USED OR DISCLOSED WITHOUT WRITTEN
CONSENT OF TRACHTENBERG ARCHITECTS.
2104 JOB:
SHEET:
2421 Fourth Street
Berkeley, California 94710
510.649.1414
www.TrachtenbergArch.com
TRACHTENBERG
ARCHITECTS
03.15.2022 ZONING APPLICATION
3000 Shattuck Ave
Berkeley, CA
07.08.22 ZONING INCOMPLETE RESPONSE
CONCEPTUAL
GRADING PLAN
A5.1
1 -
GROUND LEVEL PLAN
1/8" = 1'-0" @ 24X36 1/16' = 1'-0" @ 11X17
Plant List
Index Latin Name Common Name Size Spacing WELO
Trees
AM Arctostaphylos manzanita 'Dr. Hurd' Manzanita 15 gal 12'-0" o.c. VL CL Chilopsis linearis 'Burgundy' Burgundy Desert Willow (standard tree form) 36" box 20'-0" o.c. L CR Ceanothus 'Ray Hartman' Ray Hartman Ceanothus (standard tree form) 24" box 15'-0" o.c. L GB Ginkgo biloba Ginkgo 24" box as shown M
LC Lophstemon confertus Brisbane Box 24" box as shown L MC Myrica californica Pacific Wax Myrtle 15 gal as shown L Shrubs
AA Agave attenuata 'Ray of Light' Ray of Light Foxtail Agave 10 gal 4'-0" o.c. L BG Bouteloua gracilis 'Blonde Ambition' Blonde Ambition Blue Grama Grass 1 gal 30" o.c. L CS Cornus sericea, C. Stolonifera 'Hedgerow Gold'Hedgerow Gold Redtwig Dogwood 1 gal 4'-0" o.c. M DA Diplacus aurantiacus Orange Bush Monkeyflower 1 gal 2'-6" o.c. L DP Diplacus puniceus, Mimulus puniceus Red Bush Monkeyflower 1 gal 2'-6" o.c. L EC Elymus condensatus 'Canyon Prince' Canyon Prince' Blue Rye Grass 1 gal 36" o.c. L FC Festuca californica California Fescue 1 gal 4'-0" o.c. M JE Juncus effusus Soft Rush 1 gal 2'-6" o.c. H
JP Juncus patens Common Rush 1 gal 3'-6" o.c. H
MR Muhlenbergia rigens Deer Grass 1 gal 3'0" o.c. L
Groundcovers
AP Agrostis pallens West Coast Native Bunchgrass sod L
CF Calamagrostis foliosa Mendocino Reed Grass 1 gal 18" o.c. L DC Deschampsia cespitosa 'Northern Lights' Northern Lights Tufted Hairgrass 1 gal 2'-0" o.c. M HA Heuchera americana 'Green Spice' Green Spice Coral Bells 1 gal M SK Sempervivum 'Krebs 2' Krebs Desert Bloom Hens and Chicks 1 gal as shown L SR Sedum rupestre 'Angelina' Angelina Stonecrop trays as shown L ZC Epilobium canum (Zauschneria californica) California Fuschia 1 gal 2'-6" o.c. VL Rooftop Sedums
SC1 Sedum spathulifolium 'Purpureum' Red Pacific Stonecrop 1 gal L SC2 Sedum spathulifolium 'Cape Blanco' Cape Blanco Pacific Stonecrop 1 gal L SC3 Sedum divergens Pacific Stonecrop 1 gal L
Note: At least 80% of all plantings will be California natives.
EVERGREEN SCREEN
-Pittosporum 'Silver Sheen'
SHADE TREE
-Burgundy Desert Willow
ACCENT
GRASSES
-Northern Lights
-Blonde Ambition
ARCHITECTURAL ARCH
FLOWERING ACCENT
-Snowball Ceanothus
ROCK OUT-CROP, TYP
NATIVE ACCENT GRASS
-Elymus condensatus 'Canyon Prince'
A S H B Y A V E N U E
S H A T T U C K A V E N U E
PAINTED OR REFURBISHED BLDG WALL OR
OFFSET VERTICAL SURFACE SERVES AS
BACKDROP/CONTRAST TO HIGHLIGHT
PROPOSED PLANTINGS
DECOMPOSED GRANITE
GROUND PLANE
NATIVE NOOK PLANTINGS (96 SF)
Manzanita 'Dr. Hurd'
Hedgerow Gold Redtwig Dogwood
Monkeyflower spp.
Festuca californica
CONCRETE STEPPERS FLOAT
ON POOL OF WATER
ACCENT
-Monkeyflower spp.
BOARDWALK BANDS FLUSH W/ PATIO
CONCRETE BANDS
`FREESTANDING RECTANGULAR ARCH ECHOES
ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES AT ROOF DECK
- HOUSES DROP DOWN MOVIE SCREEN
GROUND PLANE TREATMENT TRAVELS
SEAMLESSLY BETW. INSIDE & OUT
CENTER LINE
ART ELEMENT CENTERED AT BLDG ENTRY & FNT ARCH
6'-0"
ADA ACCESS
GROUNDCOVER
-Agrostis pallens
ElectGenerator
Club room
Fire pump
Booster pump
CONCRETE WALK
RAMP
1401 SF PLANTING AREA
FOREGROUND ACCENT PLANTING
-Agave attenuata
146 SF PLANTING AREA
PROPOSED STREET TREE AT ASHBY AVE
-Lophostemon confertus
ROOT BARRIER AT SOUTHERN EDGE
OF TREE WELL TO PROTECT GAS LINE
FLEXI-PAVE FILLS
TREE WELLS, TYP.
CONTINUE (E) STREET
TREE PATTERN NORTH
OF ASHBY AVE (OFFSITE)
-Ginkgo biloba
ACCENT PAVING AT
ENTRY
PLANTER AT BASE OF BLDG
CUT-OUT IN
PAVING FOR
PLANTING
ACCESS RAMPS
AND SIDEWALK PER
CITY OF BERKELEY
(METALLIC GRAY
COLORED RAMPS)
GROUND LEVEL
LANDSCAPE PLAN
L1.0
North 0 4 8 16NOTE: All street trees shown are new (there are no existing street trees on-site). 01 MAY 23
05.01.2023 RESPONSE TO DESIGN REVIEW
VIEW TO EAST
BAY HILLS
VIEWS TO SF BAY
& MOUNT TAM
OUTDOOR
KITCHEN
ISLAND SEATING
OUTDOOR
DINING
SPECIMEN TREE IN
RAISED SEATWALL PLANTER
- Burgundy Desert Willow
BOARDWALK CONNECTS
SPACES
ALTERNATING SEDUM MASSINGS W/
ROCK OUT-CROPS ECHOES JAPANESE
ZEN GARDEN
COUNTERTOP SEATING
TEMPERED GLASS RAILING
OVERHEAD TRELLIS
·BISTRO LIGHTS
·OVERHEAD HEATERS
COUNTERTOP
SEATING
SEATING
& FIRE PIT
PEDESTAL
PAVERS
RAISED PLANTER
W/ ACCENT TREE
-Dr. Hurd Manzanita
-Mendocino Reed Grass
PLANTINGS @ RAISED PLANTER (66 SF)
·FLOWERING TREE, Ray Hartman Ceanothus
·NATIVE GRASS, Blonde Ambition
PLANTING AREA
-Sedum spath. 'Purpureum'
PLANTING AREA
-Sedum spath. 'Cape Blanco'
-Sedum divergens
SEDUM CARPET
ROOF DECK TOTAL AREA = 4,488 SF
ROOF DECK PLANTING AREA = 1,830 SF
ROOF DECK LANDSCAPE % = 40%
GROUND LEVEL TOTAL AREA = 3,391 SF
GROUND LEVEL PLANTING AREA = 1,356 SF
GROUND LEVEL LANDSCAPE % = 40%
3000
SHATTUCK
ALL DRAWINGS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL APPEARING
HEREIN CONSTITUTE ORIGINAL AND UNPUBLISHED
WORK OF THE ARCHITECT AND MAY NOT BE
DUPLICATED, USED OR DISCLOSED WITHOUT WRITTEN
CONSENT OF TRACHTENBERG ARCHITECTS.
2104 JOB:
SHEET:
2421 Fourth Street
Berkeley, California 94710
510.649.1414
www.TrachtenbergArch.com
TRACHTENBERG
ARCHITECTS
03.09.2021 REVISED BASE PLANS
3000 Shattuck Ave
Berkeley, CA
OUT INSIDEO
landscape architecture
6000 Harwood Ave
Oakland CA 94618
www.aboutinsideout.com
07.08.2022 ZONING INCOMPLETE RESPONSE
01.06.2023 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMITTAL
F O R A G E N C Y R E V I E W O N L Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N
05.01.2023 RESPONSE TO DESIGN REVIEW
ROOF DECK
GROUND LEVEL
L1.1
North0 2 4 8
z
0 l
o
:::J
O'.'.
1-
(j)
z
0 u
O'.'.
TRACHTENBERG
ARCHITECTS
2421 Fourth Street
Berkeley, California 94710
S 10,649.1414
www.TrachtenbergArch.com
INSIDECt UT
landscape architecture
6000 Harwood Ave
Oakland CA 94618
www.aboutinsideout.com
3000
o SHATTUCK
LL
l
o
z
>
_J
z
0 w
>
w
O'.'.
>
u
z
w
('J
<(
O'.'.
0 LL
3000 Shattuck Ave
Berkeley, CA
03.09.2021 REVISED BASE PLANS
07.08.2022 ZONING INCOMPLETE RESPONSE
01.06.2023 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMITTAL
ALL DRAWINGS AND WRITTEN ,IATERIAL APPEARING
HEREIN CONSTITUTE ORIGINAL AND UNPUBLISHED
WORK OF THE ARCHITECT AND MAY NOT BE
DUPLICATED. USED OR DISCLOSED WITHOUT WRITTEN
CONSENT OF TRACHTENBERG ARCHITECTS
JOB 2104
SHEET
LANDSCAPE
IMAGERY
L2.0
05.01.2023 RESPONSE TO DESIGN REVIEW
2 CY
BIN
2 CY
BIN
2 CY
BIN
2 CY
BIN
96 gal
96 gal
96 gal
96 gal
96 gal
96 gal
CUCUCUCUCUCUCUCU
CU CU CU CU CU CU CU CU CU
CU CU CU
CUCUCU
P
MV
FS
CU
CON CON CON CON
PRV
3000
SHATTUCK
ALL DRAWINGS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL APPEARING
HEREIN CONSTITUTE ORIGINAL AND UNPUBLISHED
WORK OF THE ARCHITECT AND MAY NOT BE
DUPLICATED, USED OR DISCLOSED WITHOUT WRITTEN
CONSENT OF TRACHTENBERG ARCHITECTS.
2104 JOB:
SHEET:
2421 Fourth Street
Berkeley, California 94710
510.649.1414
www.TrachtenbergArch.com
TRACHTENBERG
ARCHITECTS
03.09.2021 REVISED BASE PLANS
3000 Shattuck Ave
Berkeley, CA
landscape architecture
6000 Harwood Ave
Oakland CA 94618
www.aboutinsideout.com
07.08.2022 ZONING INCOMPLETE RESPONSE
GROUND LEVEL
IRRIGATION PLAN
I1.0
North0 4 8 16
fax 925.932.5671 tel 925.939.3985
www.rmairrigation.com
2760 Camino Diablo
Walnut Creek, CA 94597
Russell D. Mitchell Associates, Inc.
Irrigation Consultant:
1" WATER METER FOR IRRIGATION TO BE PROVIDED BY UTILITY EBMUD. MAXIMUM IRRIGATION DEMAND: ( )GPM AT ( )PSI STATIC PRESSURE AT WATER METER LOCATION.
1.25" ELECTRICAL CONDUIT AND SPLICE BOX FOR 2-WIRE CABLE
TO BE PROVIDED AND INSTALLED FROM IRRIGATION CONTROLLER "C" TO THIS LOCATION UNDER ELECTRICAL CONTRACT WORK BY A LICENSED ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR. COORDINATE INSTALLATION
OF CONDUIT WITH GENERAL/ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR(S) PRIOR
TO CONSTRUCTION.
1 PLAN NOTES LEGEND
APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF BOOSTER PUMP BY OTHERS. PRESSURE ON DISCHARGE SIDE OF BOOSTER PUMP SHALL BE 95 PSI.
3 INSTALL A 1" IRRIGATION BACKFLOW PREVENTER AT THIS
APPROXIMATE LOCATION.
2 IRRIGATION MASTER VALVE AND FLOW SENSOR.
5 4IRRIGATION CONTROLLER "C". MOUNT ON INTERIOR WALL AT THIS LOCATION AS DETAILED AND AS DIRECTED BY ARCHITECT.
CONNECT TO 120 VOLT A.C. ELECTRICAL SERVICE INSTALLED AT THIS LOCATION UNDER ELECTRICAL CONTRACT. IRRIGATION
CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE LOCATION OF ELECTRICAL
SERVICE PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.
1.25" COPPER PIPE STUB-OUT FOR IRRIGATION FROM MECHANICAL
ROOM TO THIS APPROXIMATE LOCATION TO SERVICE ROOF LEVEL
PLANTERS TO BE PROVIDED AND INSTALLED IN-STRUCTURE UNDER PLUMBING CONTRACT. COORDINATE INSTALLATION OF PIPE WITH GENERAL/PLUMBING CONTRACTOR(S) PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.
9 10
71.25" COPPER PIPE STUB-OUT FOR IRRIGATION FROM MECHANICAL
ROOM TO THIS APPROXIMATE LOCATION TO SERVICE SITE LEVEL
PLANTERS TO BE PROVIDED AND INSTALLED IN-STRUCTURE UNDER PLUMBING CONTRACT. COORDINATE INSTALLATION OF PIPE WITH GENERAL/PLUMBING CONTRACTOR(S) PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.
81.25" ELECTRICAL CONDUIT AND SPLICE BOX FOR 2-WIRE CABLE
TO BE PROVIDED AND INSTALLED FROM IRRIGATION CONTROLLER "C" TO THIS LOCATION UNDER ELECTRICAL CONTRACT WORK BY A LICENSED ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR. COORDINATE INSTALLATION
OF CONDUIT WITH GENERAL/ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR(S) PRIOR
TO CONSTRUCTION.
INSTALL A 1" PRESSURE REDUCING VALVE FOR MAIN SERVICING SITE LEVEL. SET PRESSURE TO BE 50 PSI.
6 1 2
3 4
5 9
10 6
78 NOTES:
1. ONE BUBBLER SYMBOL IS SHOWN AT TREES FOR GRAPHIC CLARITY ONLY.
INSTALL MINIMUM TWO BUBBLERS AT EACH TREE. INSTALL REQUIRED NUMBER OF BUBBLERS AS DETAILED.
2. IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT MAY BE SHOWN WITHIN HARDSCAPE FOR GRAPHIC CLARITY ONLY. INSTALL ALL IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT WITHIN PLANTED AREAS.
IRRIGATION PIPE AND WIRE CROSSING BENEATH HARDSCAPE SURFACES SHALL BE CONTAINED WITHIN SLEEVING OR SCHEDULE 40 PVC CONDUIT. SLEEVING
SIZE SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF TWO TIMES THE AGGREGATE DIAMETER OF ALL PIPES CONTAINED WITH SLEEVE. PROVIDE VERTICAL SWEEP FOR ALL
ELECTRICAL CONDUIT ON EACH SIDE OF HARDSCAPE AND TERMINATE ENDS AT 12" MINIMUM DEPTH AND 12" FROM HARDSCAPE SURFACE.
3. UNSIZED LATERAL LINE PIPING LOCATED DOWN STREAM OF 1" PIPING SHALL BE 3/4" IN SIZE (TYPICAL).
4. SIZING OF LATERAL PIPE SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS:
0.75" 0-6 GPM
1"7-12 GPM
5. SIZING OF LATERAL PIPE FOR DRIPLINE (12" O.C. GRID WITH 0.6 GPH OR LESS EMITTERS) SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS:
0.75 0-500 FT
1"501-1100 FT
01.06.2023 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMITTAL
05.01.2023 RESPONSE TO DESIGN REVIEW
CU
CON
3000
SHATTUCK
ALL DRAWINGS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL APPEARING
HEREIN CONSTITUTE ORIGINAL AND UNPUBLISHED
WORK OF THE ARCHITECT AND MAY NOT BE
DUPLICATED, USED OR DISCLOSED WITHOUT WRITTEN
CONSENT OF TRACHTENBERG ARCHITECTS.
2104 JOB:
SHEET:
2421 Fourth Street
Berkeley, California 94710
510.649.1414
www.TrachtenbergArch.com
TRACHTENBERG
ARCHITECTS
03.09.2021 REVISED BASE PLANS
3000 Shattuck Ave
Berkeley, CA
landscape architecture
6000 Harwood Ave
Oakland CA 94618
www.aboutinsideout.com
07.08.2022 ZONING INCOMPLETE RESPONSE
ROOF DECK
IRRIGATION PLAN
I1.1
North0 2 4 8
1.25" ELECTRICAL CONDUIT AND SPLICE BOX FOR 2-WIRE CABLE
TO BE PROVIDED AND INSTALLED FROM IRRIGATION CONTROLLER "C" TO THIS LOCATION UNDER ELECTRICAL CONTRACT WORK BY A LICENSED ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR. COORDINATE INSTALLATION
OF CONDUIT WITH GENERAL/ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR(S) PRIOR
TO CONSTRUCTION.
1.25" COPPER PIPE STUB-OUT FOR IRRIGATION FROM MECHANICAL
ROOM TO THIS APPROXIMATE LOCATION TO SERVICE ROOF LEVEL
PLANTERS TO BE PROVIDED AND INSTALLED IN-STRUCTURE UNDER PLUMBING CONTRACT. COORDINATE INSTALLATION OF PIPE WITH GENERAL/PLUMBING CONTRACTOR(S) PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.
1 2
1 NOTES:
1. ONE BUBBLER SYMBOL IS SHOWN AT TREES FOR GRAPHIC CLARITY ONLY.
INSTALL MINIMUM TWO BUBBLERS AT EACH TREE. INSTALL REQUIRED NUMBER OF BUBBLERS AS DETAILED.
2. IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT MAY BE SHOWN WITHIN HARDSCAPE FOR GRAPHIC CLARITY ONLY. INSTALL ALL IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT WITHIN PLANTED AREAS.
IRRIGATION PIPE AND WIRE CROSSING BENEATH HARDSCAPE SURFACES SHALL BE CONTAINED WITHIN SLEEVING OR SCHEDULE 40 PVC CONDUIT. SLEEVING
SIZE SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF TWO TIMES THE AGGREGATE DIAMETER OF ALL PIPES CONTAINED WITH SLEEVE. PROVIDE VERTICAL SWEEP FOR ALL
ELECTRICAL CONDUIT ON EACH SIDE OF HARDSCAPE AND TERMINATE ENDS AT 12" MINIMUM DEPTH AND 12" FROM HARDSCAPE SURFACE.
3. UNSIZED LATERAL LINE PIPING LOCATED DOWN STREAM OF 1" PIPING SHALL BE 3/4" IN SIZE (TYPICAL).
4. SIZING OF LATERAL PIPE SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS:
0.75" 0-6 GPM
1"7-12 GPM
5. SIZING OF LATERAL PIPE FOR DRIPLINE (12" O.C. GRID WITH 0.6 GPH OR LESS EMITTERS) SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS:
0.75 0-500 FT
1"501-1100 FT
PLAN NOTES LEGEND
2 fax 925.932.5671 tel 925.939.3985
www.rmairrigation.com
2760 Camino Diablo
Walnut Creek, CA 94597
Russell D. Mitchell Associates, Inc.
Irrigation Consultant:
01.06.2023 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMITTAL
05.01.2023 RESPONSE TO DESIGN REVIEW
3000
SHATTUCK
ALL DRAWINGS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL APPEARING
HEREIN CONSTITUTE ORIGINAL AND UNPUBLISHED
WORK OF THE ARCHITECT AND MAY NOT BE
DUPLICATED, USED OR DISCLOSED WITHOUT WRITTEN
CONSENT OF TRACHTENBERG ARCHITECTS.
2104 JOB:
SHEET:
2421 Fourth Street
Berkeley, California 94710
510.649.1414
www.TrachtenbergArch.com
TRACHTENBERG
ARCHITECTS
03.09.2021 REVISED BASE PLANS
3000 Shattuck Ave
Berkeley, CA
landscape architecture
6000 Harwood Ave
Oakland CA 94618
www.aboutinsideout.com
07.08.2022 ZONING INCOMPLETE RESPONSE
IRRIGATION
NOTES AND LEGEND
I1.2
IRRIGATION COORDINATION NOTES
1. COPPER PIPING WITHIN STRUCTURE SHALL BE PROVIDED, ROUTED, AND INSTALLED BY PLUMBING CONTRACTOR. EXIT OF PIPE TO
PLANTER SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 6" BELOW FINISH GRADE.
2. IRRIGATION SLEEVING AND/OR CONDUIT IN STRUCTURE TO BE PROVIDED AND INSTALLED UNDER STRUCTURAL WORK.
3. ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE CONDUIT, PULL BOXES AND WIRE IN STRUCTURE. THE DRAWINGS INDICATE REQUIRED
WIRE QUANTITIES FROM A GIVEN PLANTER LOCATION, THROUGH
STRUCTURE, TO THE CONTROLLER LOCATION. 14 GAUGE WIRE
SHALL BE USED FOR CONTROL WIRING AND 12 GAUGE FOR
COMMON GROUND. FINAL CONNECTION OR WIRING TO REMOTE
CONTROL VALVES AND CONTROLLER SHALL BE COMPLETED BY
IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR.
fax 925.932.5671 tel 925.939.3985
www.rmairrigation.com
2760 Camino Diablo
Walnut Creek, CA 94597
Russell D. Mitchell Associates, Inc.
Irrigation Consultant:
IRRIGATION NOTES
HUNTER REMOTE CONTROL VALVE WITH 40 PSI PRESSURE REGULATOR PCB-25
SCHEDULE 40 PVC PLASTIC PIPE. COVER TO BE AS
INDICATED IN SPECIFICATIONS OR AS INDICATED
ABOVE FOR PIPE DEPTH OF COVER.
3/4" AND LARGER:
1120-SCHEDULE 40 PVC PLASTIC PIPE WITH
SCHEDULE 40 PVC SOLVENT WELD FITTINGS.
12" COVER.
LATERAL LINE:
SLEEVING:
975XL2SEU-1"WILKINS REDUCED PRESSURE BACKFLOW ASSEMBL.
1.25" THROUGHOUT:
1120-SCHEDULE 40 PVC PLASTIC PIPE WITH
SCHEDULE 40 PVC SOLVENT WELD FITTINGS.
18" COVER.
MAIN LINE:
ICV-101/AS-40
ICZ-101-40HUNTER REMOTE CONTROL VALVE WITH A 40 PSI PRESSURE REGULATOR AND A 1" FILTER.
CONTROLLER AND STATION NUMBER
AREA (SQ. FT.)
FLOW (GPM)
REMOTE CONTROL VALVE SIZE (IN INCHES)
ASSOCIATED REMOTE CONTROL VALVE
WATER USE CLASSIFICATION OF ZONE
APPLICATION RATE (IN/HR) or DRIPLINE SPACING
or
CONCONELECTRICALCONDUIT:
SHOWN FOR REFERENCE ONLY, SEE ELECTRICAL PLANS FOR
ROUTING THROUGH STRUCTURE.
CUCUCU1.25" THROUGHOUT:
TYPE 'K' COPPER PIPE WITH WROUGHT FITTINGS. SHOWN
FOR REFERENCE ONLY, SEE PLUMBING PLANS FOR
ROUTING THROUGH STRUCTURE.
MAIN LINE:
T-FP600A-LF-1"NIBCO 1" BRASS BALL VALVE
ECO-IDHUNTER ECO-INDICATOR
3/4" AND LARGER:
1120-SCHEDULE 40 PVC PLASTIC PIPE WITH
SCHEDULE 40 PVC SOLVENT WELD FITTINGS.
12" COVER.
DRIPLINE
LATERAL LINE:
WT-WRSWIRELESS RAIN SENSOR SYSTEM. AUTOMATICALLY SHUTS THE SYSTEM OFF AS SOON AS IT STARTS RAINING.
DRIP ZONE:
DRIPLINE REMOTE CONTROL VALVE
HUNTER HDL SERIES DRIPLINE WITH BUILT IN PRESSURE COMPENSATION AND CHECK VALVE, PART #HDL-06-12-250-CV. USE PLD FITTINGS.
TUBING TO BE INSTALLED 4" BELOW GRADE IN A 12" O.C. GRID ACCORDING TO DETAILS. SIZE EXHAUST HEADERS AS FOLLOWS: 1": 0-10 GPM, 1.25": 11-20 GPM. ALL EXHAUST HEADERS SHALL BE 1" SCH 40 PVC OR 1" SCH 40 FLEXIBLE PVC. USE SCH. 40 PVC SOLVENT WELD FITTINGS.
EXTEND PVC HEADERS TO THE ENDS OF ALL DRIP ZONES TO BALANCE FLOW IF REQUIRED. SEE DETAILS FOR FURTHER INFORMATION.
APPROXIMATE CONNECTION POINT BETWEEN DRIPLINE
TUBING AND PVC SUPPLY WHEN DRIP ZONE IS LESS
THAN 3 GPM AND NO PVC SUPPLY/EXHUST HEADERS
ARE NEEDED. REFER TO DRIPLINE TUBING CONNECTION
DETAIL FOR MORE INFORMATION.
DRIPLINE REMOTE CONTROL VALVE
44-LRCRAIN BIRD 1" TWO-PIECE QUICK COUPLING VALVE (YELLOW LOCKING
RUBBER COVER)
WT-MV-100G-SNOMVWeatherTRAK 1" BRASS MASTER VALVE (NORMALLY OPEN) WLT-0500-TNDS SCH 40 BALL VALVE OR APPROVED EQUAL
HUNTER BUBBLER (TREE)
MIN. 2 PER TREE. REFER TO
BUBBLER DETAIL FOR
QUANTITY OF BUBBLERS
PER TREE SIZE.
0.25TRICKLE 30
QB44RCAR10BUCKNER 1" TWO-PIECE QUICK COUPLING VALVE (ANTI-ROTATION)
PVC LATERAL
SUPPLY
HEADER
EXHAUST
HEADER
DRIP ZONE
EXTENTS
PVC LATERAL
XX
STATION #
COLOR HATCH
OF ZONE
XX
STATION #
DRIP ZONE
EXTENTS
COLOR HATCH
OF ZONE
IRRIGATION LEGEND
SYMBOL
OPERATING
PSI DESCRIPTION
NOZZLE
GPM
OPERATING
RADIUS (FEET) MODEL NUMBER
WeatherTRAK 1" FLOW SENSORWTFLOW-HD-P-100FS
WTPRO3-C-H2048-SWM WeatherTRAK ET PRO3 2-WIRE 48 STATION CONTROLLER IN A STAINLESS STEEL WALL MOUNTED ENCLOSURE.
WT2W-H2O-1VDWEATHERTRAK DECODER (1 PER VALVE)
WT2W-H20-SAWEATHERTRAK SURGE ARRESTOR (1 EVERY 500 FEET ALONG MAIN) REFER TO DETAILS FOR INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS.
ROUTE TWO WIRE CABLE TO ALL REMOTE CONTROL VALVES. SIZE #14AWG WIRE WITH A JACKETED 2-CONDUCTOR. PREFERRED WIRE MAKE AND MODEL IS PAIGE ELECTRIC WIRE P7072D. ALL SPLICING SHALL BE MADE WITH 3-M DBR/Y-6 WATERPROOF SPLICE KITS OR APPROVED EQUAL. INSTALL 2 WIRE CABLE WITHIN 1.25" SCH 40 ELECTRICAL CONDUIT. PULL BOXES SHALL BE LOCATED EVERY 200' NO SPLICES ARE ALLOWED BETWEEN VALVES. REFER TO DETAIL FOR INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS.
NOT SHOWN ON
PLANS
WT2W-H2O-FSWEATHERTRAK FLOW SENSOR DECODER
CIMXL-5YA5 YEAR EXTENSION OF WeatherTRAK Central.
WT2W-H2O-2VDWEATHERTRAK DECODER - TWO STATION
WT2W-H2O-MVWEATHERTRAK MASTER VALVE DECODER
WT2W-H2O-PSWEATHERTRAK PUMP START DECODER
1. THESE IRRIGATION DRAWINGS ARE DIAGRAMMATIC AND
INDICATIVE OF THE WORK TO BE INSTALLED. ALL PIPING, VALVES,
AND OTHER IRRIGATION COMPONENTS MAY BE SHOWN WITHIN
PAVED AREAS FOR GRAPHIC CLARITY ONLY AND ARE TO BE
INSTALLED WITHIN PLANTING AREAS. DUE TO THE SCALE OF THE
DRAWINGS, IT IS NOT POSSIBLE TO INDICATE ALL OFFSETS,
FITTINGS, SLEEVES, CONDUIT, AND OTHER ITEMS WHICH MAY BE REQUIRED. INVESTIGATE THE STRUCTURAL AND FINISHED
CONDITION AFFECTING THE CONTRACT WORK INCLUDING
OBSTRUCTIONS, GRADE DIFFERENCES OR AREA DIMENSIONAL
DIFFERENCES. IN THE EVENT OF FIELD DISCREPANCY WITH
CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, PLAN THE INSTALLATION WORK
ACCORDINGLY BY NOTIFICATION AND APPROVAL OF THE
OWNER'S AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE AND ACCORDING TO THE
CONTRACT SPECIFICATIONS. NOTIFY AND COORDINATE
IRRIGATION CONTRACT WORK WITH APPLICABLE CONTRACTORS
FOR THE LOCATION AND INSTALLATION OF PIPE, CONDUIT OR
SLEEVES THROUGH OR UNDER WALLS, ROADWAYS, PAVING AND
STRUCTURES BEFORE CONSTRUCTION. IN THE EVENT THESE
NOTIFICATIONS ARE NOT PERFORMED, THE CONTRACTOR
ASSUMES FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR REQUIRED REVISIONS.
2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODES, STANDARDS, AND REGULATIONS. ALL WORK AND MATERIALS
SHALL BE IN FULL ACCORDANCE WITH THE LATEST RULES AND
REGULATIONS OF THE NATIONAL ELECTRIC CODE; THE UNIFORM
PLUMBING CODE, PUBLISHED BY THE WESTERN PLUMBING
OFFICIALS ASSOCIATION; AND OTHER STATE OR LOCAL LAWS OR REGULATIONS. NOTHING IN THESE DRAWINGS IS TO BE
CONSTRUED TO PERMIT WORK NOT CONFORMING TO THESE
CODES OR REGULATIONS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH
WITHOUT ANY EXTRA CHARGE, ANY ADDITIONAL MATERIAL AND
LABOR WHEN REQUIRED BY THE COMPLIANCE WITH THESE CODES
AND REGULATIONS.
3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE INSTALLATION OF
IRRIGATION SYSTEM WITH LAYOUT AND INSTALLATION OF THE
PLANT MATERIALS TO INSURE THAT THERE WILL BE COMPLETE AND
UNIFORM IRRIGATION COVERAGE OF PLANTING IN ACCORDANCE
WITH THESE DRAWINGS, AND CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. THE
IRRIGATION LAYOUT SHALL BE CHECKED BY THE CONTRACTOR
AND OWNER'S AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO
CONSTRUCTION TO DETERMINE IF ANY CHANGES, DELETIONS, OR ADDITIONS ARE REQUIRED. IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL BE
INSTALLED AND TESTED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF PLANT
MATERIAL.
4. THE INTENT OF THIS IRRIGATION SYSTEM IS TO PROVIDE THE
MINIMUM AMOUNT OF WATER REQUIRED TO SUSTAIN GOOD
PLANT HEALTH.
5. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE MAINTENANCE CONTRACTOR
AND/OR OWNER TO PROGRAM THE IRRIGATION CONTROLLER(S)
TO PROVIDE THE MINIMUM AMOUNT OF WATER NEEDED TO
SUSTAIN GOOD PLANT HEALTH. THIS INCLUDES MAKING
ADJUSTMENTS TO THE PROGRAM FOR SEASONAL WEATHER
CHANGES, PLANT MATERIAL, WATER REQUIREMENTS, MOUNDS,
SLOPES, SUN, SHADE AND WIND EXPOSURE.
6. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF A LICENSED ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE 120 VOLT A.C. (2.5 AMP DEMAND PER CONTROLLER) ELECTRICAL SERVICE TO THE CONTROLLER LOCATION(S). IT IS THE
RESPONSIBILITY OF THE IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR TO
COORDINATE THE ELECTRICAL SERVICE STUB-OUT TO THE
CONTROLLER(S). PROVIDE PROPER GROUNDING PER CONTROLLER
MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH
LOCAL CODES.
7. INSTALL NEW BATTERIES IN THE IRRIGATION CONTROLLER(S) TO
RETAIN PROGRAM IN MEMORY DURING TEMPORARY POWER
FAILURES. USE QUANTITY, TYPE AND SIZE REQUIRED AS PER
CONTROLLER MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS.
8. SCHEDULE A MEETING WHICH INCLUDES REPRESENTATIVES OF THE
IRRIGATION CONTROLLER MANUFACTURER, THE MAINTENANCE
CONTRACTOR, THE OWNER AND THE IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR
AT THE SITE FOR INSTRUCTION ON THE PROPER PROGRAMMING
AND OPERATION OF THE IRRIGATION CONTROLLER.
9. INSTALL 2-WIRE CABLE ALONG THE MAIN LINE. CONTACT
CONTROLLER REPRESENTATIVE FOR A PRE-CONSTRUCTION
MEETING.
10. INSTALL 2-WIRE CABLE WITHIN 1.25" CONDUIT WITH LONG SWEEPS IN AND OUT OF EACH VALVE BOX. SEAL ALL CONDUIT
OPENINGS WITH WATERPROOF FOAM.
11. INSTALL A 14"X19" GREY ELECTRICAL PULL BOX EVERY 200' AND AT EVERY CHANGE IN DIRECTION. ONLY SPLICE TWO WIRE CABLE AT THREE WAY WIRE CONNECTIONS.
12. IRRIGATION CONTROL WIRES: SOLID COPPER WITH U.L. APPROVAL FOR DIRECT BURIAL IN GROUND. SIZE #14AWG WIRE WITH A
JACKETED 2-CONDUCTOR. PREFERRED WIRE MAKE AND MODEL IS
THE PAIGE IRRIGATION WIRE, SPEC P7072D. ALL SPLICING SHALL BE MADE WITH 3-M DBR/Y-6 WATERPROOF SPLICE KIT.
13. DECODER GROUNDING SHALL BE PROVIDED EVERY 600 FEET, AT
THE CONTROLLER AND AT THE LAST DECODER OR AT THE END OF THE 2 WIRE PATH. GROUND WITH A 5/8" X 8' COPPER CLAD
GROUNDING ROD. #6 COPPER WIRE TO SURGE DEVICE/DECODER.
INCLUDE A SURGE ARRESTOR AT EACH GROUNDING LOCATION. A
SPLIT BOLT CONNECTION TO BE USED TO CONNECT THE SURGE
DEVICE TO THE GROUND WIRE WITH A DBR/Y-6 WATERPROOF
CONNECTOR.
14. SPLICING OF JACKETED 2-WIRE IS PERMITTED IN VALVE BOXES ONLY. LEAVE A 24" LONG COIL OF WIRE AT EACH SPLICE AND A 24" LONG EXPANSION LOOP IN ALL PULL BOXES.
15. INSTALL BLACK PLASTIC VALVE BOXES WITH BOLT DOWN, NON HINGED COVER MARKED "IRRIGATION CONTROL VALVE". BOX
BODY SHALL HAVE KNOCK OUTS. ACCEPTABLE VALVE BOX
MANUFACTURER'S INCLUDE NDS, CARSON OR APPROVED EQUAL.
16. INSTALL REMOTE CONTROL VALVE BOXES 12" FROM WALK, CURB, BUILDING OR LANDSCAPE FEATURE. AT MULTIPLE VALVE BOX
GROUPS, INSTALL EACH BOX AN EQUAL DISTANCE FROM THE
WALK, CURB, BUILDING OR LANDSCAPE FEATURE AND PROVIDE 12" BETWEEN BOX TOPS. ALIGN THE SHORT SIDE OF RECTANGULAR
VALVE BOXES PARALLEL TO WALK, CURB, BUILDING OR LANDSCAPE FEATURE.
17. VALVE LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE DIAGRAMMATIC. INSTALL IN
GROUND COVER/SHRUB AREAS.
18. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL LABEL CONTROL LINE WIRE AT EACH REMOTE CONTROL VALVE WITH A 2 1/4" X 2 3/4" POLYURETHANE I.D. TAG, INDICATING IDENTIFICATION NUMBER OF VALVE
(CONTROLLER AND STATION NUMBER). ATTACH LABEL TO
CONTROL WIRE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PERMANENTLY STAMP
ALL VALVE BOX LIDS WITH APPROPRIATE IDENTIFICATION AS
NOTED IN CONSTRUCTION DETAILS.
19. FLUSH AND ADJUST IRRIGATION OUTLETS AND NOZZLES FOR
OPTIMUM PERFORMANCE AND TO PREVENT OVER SPRAY ONTO
WALKS, ROADWAYS, AND/OR BUILDINGS. SELECT THE BEST
DEGREE OF THE ARC AND RADIUS TO FIT THE EXISTING SITE
CONDITIONS AND THROTTLE THE FLOW CONTROL AT EACH VALVE
TO OBTAIN THE OPTIMUM OPERATING PRESSURE FOR EACH
CONTROL ZONE.
20. LOCATE BUBBLERS ON UPHILL SIDE OF PLANT OR TREE.
21. INSTALL A HUNTER HCV SERIES, KBI CV SERIES, OR APPROVED
EQUAL SPRING LOADED CHECK VALVE IN SPRINKLER RISER
ASSEMBLIES WHERE LOW OUTLET DRAINAGE WILL CAUSE EROSION AND/OR EXCESS WATER.
22. WHERE IT IS NECESSARY TO EXCAVATE ADJACENT TO EXISTING
TREES, USE CAUTION TO AVOID INJURY TO TREES AND TREE
ROOTS. EXCAVATE BY HAND IN AREAS WHERE TWO (2) INCH AND LARGER ROOTS OCCUR. BACK FILL TRENCHES ADJACENT TO TREE WITHIN TWENTY-FOUR (24) HOURS. WHERE THIS IS NOT POSSIBLE,
SHADE THE SIDE OF THE TRENCH ADJACENT TO THE TREE WITH WET BURLAP OR CANVAS.
23. NOTIFY LOCAL JURISDICTIONS FOR INSPECTION AND TESTING OF INSTALLED BACKFLOW PREVENTION DEVICE.
24. THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM DESIGN IS BASED ON THE MINIMUM OPERATING PRESSURE SHOWN ON THE IRRIGATION DRAWINGS.
VERIFY WATER PRESSURE PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. REPORT ANY
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE WATER PRESSURE INDICATED ON THE
DRAWINGS AND THE ACTUAL PRESSURE READING AT THE
IRRIGATION POINT OF CONNECTION TO THE OWNER'S
AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE.
25. IRRIGATION DEMAND: REFER TO PLANS.
26. PIPE SIZING SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS IS TYPICAL. AS CHANGES
IN LAYOUT OCCUR DURING STAKING AND CONSTRUCTION THE
SIZE MAY NEED TO BE ADJUSTED ACCORDINGLY.
27. PIPE THREAD SEALANT COMPOUND SHALL BE RECTOR SEAL #5.
28. THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MINOR
CHANGES IN THE IRRIGATION LAYOUT DUE TO OBSTRUCTIONS
NOT SHOWN ON THE IRRIGATION DRAWINGS SUCH AS LIGHTS,
FIRE HYDRANTS, SIGNS, ELECTRICAL ENCLOSURES, ETC.
29. WHEN WORK OF THIS SECTION HAS BEEN COMPLETED AND SUCH
OTHER TIMES AS MAY BE DIRECTED, REMOVE ALL TRASH, DEBRIS, SURPLUS MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT FROM SITE.
30. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SUPPLEMENTAL HAND
WATERING OF ALL PLANT MATERIAL WITHIN DRIPLINE AREAS UNTIL THE PLANTS ARE SUFFICIENTLY ESTABLISHED.
31. VERIFY LOCATIONS OF ALL IRRIGATION COMPONENTS INSTALLED
WITHIN A VALVE BOX WITH LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO
INSTALLATION. DO NOT INSTALL UNTIL LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
PROVIDES ACCEPTABLE LOCATIONS.
PCB-250.25 HUNTER BUBBLER
(SHRUB)
30 TRICKLE
WILKINS PRESSURE REDUCING VALVE500XLHLR PRV
01.06.2023 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMITTAL
05.01.2023 RESPONSE TO DESIGN REVIEW
3000
SHATTUCK
ALL DRAWINGS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL APPEARING
HEREIN CONSTITUTE ORIGINAL AND UNPUBLISHED
WORK OF THE ARCHITECT AND MAY NOT BE
DUPLICATED, USED OR DISCLOSED WITHOUT WRITTEN
CONSENT OF TRACHTENBERG ARCHITECTS.
2104 JOB:
SHEET:
2421 Fourth Street
Berkeley, California 94710
510.649.1414
www.TrachtenbergArch.com
TRACHTENBERG
ARCHITECTS
03.09.2021 REVISED BASE PLANS
3000 Shattuck Ave
Berkeley, CA
landscape architecture
6000 Harwood Ave
Oakland CA 94618
www.aboutinsideout.com
07.08.2022 ZONING INCOMPLETE RESPONSE
IRRIGATION
DETAIL
I1.3
1 2
3 1
NOTE:
4 2
4 3
MAXIMUM LINE OF SIGHT FROM RAIN SENSOR TO RECEIVER IS 300 FT. DISTANCE IS LESS IF OBSTRUCTIONS EXIST. SENSOR MUST BE INSTALLED IN "CLEAR SPACE" WHERE IT IS EXPOSED TO
UNOBSTRUCTED RAINFALL AND IS CLEAR OF IRRIGATION SPRAY.
SCALE: NONE
WIRELESS RAIN SENSOR-GUTTER MOUNT
WIRELESS RAIN SENSOR TRANSMITTER (GUTTER MOUNTED)
MOUNT RAIN SENSOR ON BUILDING WALL. ARCHITECT TO APPROVE LOCATION
CONTROLLER
RAIN SENSOR RECEIVER
2 SCALE: NONE
3WEATHERPROOF WIRE SPLICE ASSEMBLY
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. STRIP WIRES APPROXIMATELY 1/2" FROM ENDS TO EXPOSE WIRE.
2. TWIST CONNECTOR AROUND WIRES CLOCKWISE UNTIL HAND TIGHT, DO NOT OVERTIGHTEN.
3. INSERT WIRE ASSEMBLY TO BOTTOM OF GEL-FILLED TUBE. CHECK TO MAKE SURE
CONNECTOR HAS BEEN PUSHED PAST LOCKING FINGERS AND IS SEATED AT THE BOTTOM OF THE TUBE.
4. PLACE WIRES WHICH EXIT TUBE IN WIRE EXIT HOLES AND CLOSE CAP UNTIL IT SNAPS.
5. INSPECT FINAL SPLICE ASSEMBLY THAT IT IS SECURED.
NOTE:
MAXIMUM # OF WIRES PER CONNECTOR:
·3-#14 GAUGE
·2-#12 GAUGE
STEP 5 STEP 4
STEP 1
STEP 2
STEP 3
SCALE: NONE
5 SCALE: NONE
4 2.5"MIN.
1 2
CARSON 1220 RECTANGULAR PLASTIC
VALVE BOX WITH LID. INSTALL PER
REMOTE CONTROL VALVE DETAIL.
14 16
SCHEDULE 80 PVC NIPPLE (LENGTH AS
REQUIRED).
17 18
19 20
SCHEDULE 80 PVC NIPPLE (LENGTH AS
REQUIRED).
21 DURA 1"x1" THREADED ADAPTER (PART
#08303) 6 TOTAL.
8 12
13 DRIP REMOTE CONTROL VALVE. REFER TO
LEGEND FOR MODEL.
SCHEDULE 40 PVC LATERAL TO DRIP
IRRIGATION.
9FILTER. REFER TO LEGEND FOR MODEL.
5NDS 1"LO-TORQ BALL VALVE THREADED
(PART #LT-1000-T)
DURA 1" SLIP X 1" SWIVEL (PART
#329-011) 4 TOTAL.
QUICK COUPLING VALVE. INSTALL PER
DETAIL.
10" ROUND BOX. INSTALL PER DETAIL.
5 3
2 1671417
8 9
10 11
12 13
15 SCH 40 PVC 90° ELBOW (SxS) FROM PVC
MAIN LINE BELOW.
4 SCH 40 PVC PIPE. LENGTH AS REQUIRED.
3SCH 80 PVC MALE ADAPTER.
4 6
7DURA 1" MULTI-PORT MANIFOLD (PART
#301-010-4)
1040 PSI REGULATOR. REFER TO LEGEND FOR
MODEL.
11DURA 1" x 3/4" MALE ADAPTER (PART
#08303-131) 3 TOTAL. ONLY REQUIRED
WITH 3/4" OUTLET REGULATORS. USE
1"x1" DURA THREAD ADAPTER ON 1"
REGULATORS
15 FOUR REMOTE VALVE MANIFOLD DETAIL WITH QUICK COUPLING VALVE (1" VALVES ONLY) 16 SCHEDULE 80 PVC 90° ELBOW
(TxT).
SCHEDULE 40 PVC LATERAL TO BUBBLERS
OR SPRAY IRRIGATION.
1 2
CARSON 1220 RECTANGULAR PLASTIC
VALVE BOX WITH LID. INSTALL PER
REMOTE CONTROL VALVE DETAIL.
15 18
SCHEDULE 80 PVC THREADED FEMALE
COUPLING TO SERVICE QCV. IF NO QCV
INSTALL A DURA 1" CAP (PART #348-010)
SCHEDULE 80 PVC NIPPLE (LENGTH AS
REQUIRED).
19 20
SCHEDULE 80 PVC 90° ELBOW (TxT).
SCHEDULE 80 PVC NIPPLE (LENGTH AS
REQUIRED).
DURA 1"x1" THREADED ADAPTER (PART
#08303) 4 TOTAL.
9 13
14 DRIP REMOTE CONTROL VALVE. REFER TO
LEGEND FOR MODEL.
SCHEDULE 40 PVC LATERAL TO DRIP
IRRIGATION
10FILTER. REFER TO LEGEND FOR MODEL.
5NDS 1"LO-TORQ BALL VALVE THREADED
(PART #LT-1000-T)
DURA 1" SLIP X 1" SWIVEL (PART
#329-011) 2 TOTAL.
SCH 40 PVC 90° ELBOW (SxS) FROM PVC
MAIN LINE BELOW.
SCH 40 PVC PIPE. LENGTH AS REQUIRED.
3SCH 80 PVC MALE ADAPTER.
4 7
8DURA 1" MULTI-PORT MANIFOLD (PART
#301-010-2)
1140 PSI REGULATOR. REFER TO LEGEND FOR
MODEL.
12DURA 1" x 3/4" MALE ADAPTER (PART
#08303-131). ONLY REQUIRED WITH 3/4"
OUTLET REGULATORS. USE 1"x1" DURA
THREAD ADAPTER ON 1" REGULATORS
16 BUBBLER OR SPRINKLER REMOTE CONTROL
VALVE. REFER TO LEGEND FOR MODEL.
17SCHEDULE 40 PVC LATERAL TO BUBBLER OR
SPRAY IRRIGATION.
DURA 1" MIPT x 1" SWIVEL 90° (PART
#306-009)
6 781519
20 17
11 18
16 10
5 3
1 2
9 12
13 14
4 6
2.5"MIN.
22 QUICK COUPLING VALVE. INSTALL PER DETAIL.
10" ROUND BOX. INSTALL PER DETAIL.
21 21
22 TWO REMOTE VALVE MANIFOLD DETAIL WITH QUICK COUPLING VALVE (1" VALVES ONLY) SCHEDULE 80 PVC THREADED FEMALE
COUPLING TO SERVICE QCV. IF NO QCV
INSTALL A DURA 1" CAP (PART #348-010)
BUBBLER OR SPRINKLER REMOTE CONTROL
VALVE. REFER TO LEGEND FOR MODEL.
18 21
20 19
1 SCALE: NONE
IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT LAYOUT DIAGRAM DETAIL
3 16
1 7
13 NOTES:
1. THIS LAYOUT IS TO PROVIDE INFORMATION ON EQUIPMENT AND TYPICAL DISTANCES REQUIRED BETWEEN THE EQUIPMENT. IT IS DIAGRAMMATIC AND WILL NEED TO BE ADJUSTED ACCORDING TO AVAILABLE FLOOR SPACE AND OTHER EQUIPMENT INSTALLED WITHIN THE ENCLOSURE. OFFSETS AND FITTINGS WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THESE ADJUSTMENTS.
2. MAINTAIN 6" OF CLEARANCE FROM BUILDING WALLS FOR EASE OF MAINTENANCE FOR ALL COPPER PIPING, VALVES, AND FITTINGS.
3. SEAL ALL PIPE PENETRATIONS THROUGH WALLS/STRUCTURE AS REQUIRED (BY PLUMBING CONTRACTOR). SEE PLUMBING/WATERPROOFING DRAWINGS.
4. ALL FITTINGS AND PIPING FOR WATER LINES WITHIN EQUIPMENT ROOM SHALL BE COPPER WITH WROT FITTINGS OR BRASS NIPPLES. 9 11 2
5 8
IRRIGATION CONTROLLER BY IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR. MINIMUM 42" ABOVE FINISHED FLOOR.
SUB-METER FOR IRRIGATION.1.25" COPPER MAIN LINE ROUTED THROUGH STRUCTURE TO STUB-OUT LOCATION(S) AT ROOF LEVEL. INSTALLED BY PLUMBING CONTRACTOR. (REFER TO MEP PLAN FOR
EXACT ROUTING THRU BUILDING)
UNI-STRUT SUPPORT BRACKET, THREADED EXTENSIONS AND CLAMPS, LENGTH AS REQUIRED. PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 6" SEPARATION FOR THE VALVES AND PIPE FROM THE WALL.
1.25" COPPER MAIN LINE TO FOR IRRIGATION FROM DOMESTIC LINE WITHIN EQUIPMENT ROOM. SHOWN ON MEP PLANS.
MASTER VALVE AND FLOW SENSOR. PROVIDE A MINIMUM LENGTH OF 10" UPSTREAM OF FLOW SENSOR AND 5" DOWNSTREAM OF ANY FITTING. 6 MIN. 18" ± FROM FINISH FLOOR.
1.25" BRASS BALL VALVE.
101" ELECTRICAL CONDUIT WITH JUNCTION BOXES FOR CONTROL WIRES FOR FLOW SENSOR & MASTER VALVE.
4 124
3 6
5 7
8 9
10 11 12 13 14
15 INTERIOR WALL
1" WILKENS REDUCED PRESSURE BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY.
WATER BOOSTER PUMP FOR IRRIGATION BY OTHERS.
ALL FITTINGS AND PIPING FOR WATER LINES WITHIN EQUIPMENT ROOM SHALL BE COPPER WITH WROT FITTINGS OR BRASS NIPPLES.
121.25" COPPER MAIN LINE ROUTED THROUGH STRUCTURE TO STUB-OUT LOCATION(S) AT SITE LEVEL. INSTALLED BY PLUMBING CONTRACTOR. (REFER TO MEP PLAN FOR
EXACT ROUTING THRU BUILDING)
141.25" ELECTRICAL CONDUIT WITH REQUIRED JUNCTION BOXES ROUTED THROUGH
STRUCTURE FROM CONTROLLER LOCATION TO STUB-OUT LOCATION(S) AT ROOF LEVEL. INSTALLED BY ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR.
151.25" ELECTRICAL CONDUIT WITH REQUIRED JUNCTION BOXES ROUTED THROUGH
STRUCTURE FROM CONTROLLER LOCATION TO STUB-OUT LOCATION(S) AT ROOF LEVEL. INSTALLED BY ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR.
16 120 VOLT A.C. ELECTRICAL BY ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR FOR CONTROLLER.
FS
MV
171" PRESSURE REDUCING VALVE.
17 01.06.2023 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMITTAL
05.01.2023 RESPONSE TO DESIGN REVIEW
3000
SHATTUCK
ALL DRAWINGS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL APPEARING
HEREIN CONSTITUTE ORIGINAL AND UNPUBLISHED
WORK OF THE ARCHITECT AND MAY NOT BE
DUPLICATED, USED OR DISCLOSED WITHOUT WRITTEN
CONSENT OF TRACHTENBERG ARCHITECTS.
2104 JOB:
SHEET:
2421 Fourth Street
Berkeley, California 94710
510.649.1414
www.TrachtenbergArch.com
TRACHTENBERG
ARCHITECTS
03.09.2021 REVISED BASE PLANS
3000 Shattuck Ave
Berkeley, CA
landscape architecture
6000 Harwood Ave
Oakland CA 94618
www.aboutinsideout.com
07.08.2022 ZONING INCOMPLETE RESPONSE
IRRIGATION
DETAIL
I1.4
SCALE: NONE
7QUICK COUPLING VALVE
NOTE:
SIDE VIEW
TOP VIEW
1" [25mm]
10" ROUND PLASTIC VALVE BOX WITH
BOLT DOWN LID.
1 1/4" x 1 1/4" x 3/16" [30mm x 30mm x
5mm] ANGLE IRON 30" [760mm] LONG
W/2 STAINLESS STEEL STRAPS (ONE
AROUND QCV).
PVC MAIN LINE.
3" [75mm] LONG SCHEDULE 80 PVC
THREADED NIPPLE.
QUICK COUPLING VALVE.
SCHEDULE 80 PVC THREADED NIPPLE.
10" [250mm] LONG SCHEDULE 80 PVC
THREADED NIPPLE.
UPC APPROVED SCHEDULE 40 PVC TEE
OR ELBOW.
SCHEDULE 80 PVC THREADED 90° ELL.
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
NIPPLES AND FITTINGS TO BE SAME SIZE AS
VALVE IPT INLET THREAD SIZE.
REFER TO
IRRIGATION
LEGEND
1 2
3 4
6 5
9 10
11 12
FINISH GRADE.
7 8
19 GAUGE 1/2" [13mm] SQUARE WIRE
MESH.
BRICK - 2 TOTAL.
11 12
PEA GRAVEL OR 3/4" DRAIN ROCK- 4"
[100mm] DEEP BELOW VALVE (NO SOIL
IN VALVE BOX).
13 13
SCALE: NONE
8 NOTE:
1.NIPPLES AND FITTINGS TO BE SAME SIZE AS VALVE IPT INLET THREAD SIZE.
2. TRIM VALVE BOX LENGTH AS NECESSARY TO BE FLUSH WITH TOP OF PLANTING TILES.
3. IF NECESSARY SLOT SIDES VALVE BOX TO ALLOW PASSAGE OF PIPE THROUGH BOTTOM OF VALVE BOX.
QUICK-COUPLING VALVE
VALVE BOX WITH COVER:
10-INCH SIZE
PVC SCH 80 NIPPLE
(LENGTH AS REQUIRED)
PVC SCH 80 NIPPLE
(LENGTH AS REQUIRED)
SIDE VIEW
TOP VIEW
SCHEDULE 80 PVC THREADED 90° ELL.
PVC SCH 40 TEE OR ELL
PVC SCH 80 STREET ELL
STRUCTURAL FOAM OR ROOF
TOP OF FINISH GRADE
CRUSHED ROCK
QUICK COUPLING VALVE-ON STRUCTURE
PVC MAINLINE PIPE
SCALE: NONE
CARSON 1220 RECTANGULAR VALVE BOX
FOR FOUR VALVES OR CARSON 1419 FOR
TWO VALVES
REMOTE CONTROL VALVE WITH
FLOW CONTROL AND MANUAL
BLEED. REFER TO TWO OR FOUR
VALVE MANIFOLD DETAIL FOR
INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS
VALVE CONTROL WIRE- PROVIDE
3M-DBY SEAL PACKS AT ALL SPLICES
AND 24" OF EXCESS UF WIRE IN A
1" DIAMETER COIL BRICK-1 EACH CORNER
FINISH GRADE
1 2
5 6
7 4
3 2
1 1
19 GAUGE 1/2" SQUARE WIRE
MESH. WRAP UP THE SIDES OF THE
BOX
PEA GRAVEL OR 3/4" DRAIN ROCK-
4" DEEP BELOW VALVE (NO SOIL IN
VALVE BOX)
BUBBLER OR SPRAY REMOTE CONTROL VALVE
IN TWO OR FOUR VALVE MANIFOLD
6 7
3 4
5 8
SCH 40 PVC LATERAL LINE TO
BUBBLERS OR SPRAY
8 SCALE: NONE
CARSON 1220 RECTANGULAR VALVE BOX
FOR FOUR VALVES OR CARSON 1419 FOR
TWO VALVES
VALVE CONTROL WIRE- PROVIDE
3M-DBY SEAL PACKS AT ALL SPLICES
AND 24" OF EXCESS UF WIRE IN A
1" DIAMETER COIL
BRICK-1 EACH CORNER
FINISH GRADE
1 2
5 6
9 4
3 2
1 2
19 GAUGE 1/2" SQUARE WIRE
MESH. WRAP UP THE SIDES OF THE
BOX
PEA GRAVEL OR 3/4" DRAIN ROCK-
4" DEEP BELOW VALVE (NO SOIL IN
VALVE BOX)
DRIP REMOTE CONTROL VALVE IN TWO OR
FOUR VALVE MANIFOLD
7 9
3 4
5 6
SCH 40 PVC LATERAL LINE TO
DRIPLINE OR DRIP.
8 8
7DRIP FILTER AND REGULATOR
REMOTE CONTROL VALVE WITH
FLOW CONTROL AND MANUAL
BLEED. REFER TO TWO OR FOUR
VALVE MANIFOLD DETAIL FOR
INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS
A1
9 VALVE I.D. TAG (WITH CONTROL
AND STATION NUMBER).
9 A1
10 VALVE I.D. TAG (WITH CONTROL
AND STATION NUMBER).
10 1
4 6
2 #14AWG TWO WIRE CABLE FROM
CONTROLLER. REFER TO IRRIGATION NOTES
FOR MODEL NUMBER OF WIRE. ALLOW A
24" SLACK PER DECODER. USE ELECTRICAL
TAPE TO HOLD SLACK CABLES TOGETHER.
DECODER
TWO WIRE CABLE TO NEXT DECODER
ALL DECODERS SHALL HAVE A VALVE NUMBER ADDRESSED AT
CONTROLLER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.
NOTE:
1. 8VALVE BOX. REFER TO REMOTE
CONTROL VALVE DETAIL FOR
INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS.
9REMOTE CONTROL VALVE. REFER TO
REMOTE CONTROL VALVE DETAIL FOR
INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS. 3M DBR/Y-6 OR APPROVED EQUAL WATERPROOF SPLICE KIT (4 TOTAL)
DECODER WIRING IN CONDUIT
SCALE: NONE
2 1
6 7
3 3
9 8
5 DECODER
USE U.F. SAFETY CABLE STRIPPER BY KING INNOVATION (MODEL NUMBER 46200) FOR ALL TWO-WIRE SPLICE CONNECTIONS.
2. A MAXIMUM OF 4" OF WIRE SHALL BE
STRIPPED FROM TWO WIRE CABLE WHEN
SPLICING AT DECODERS.
4 CONNECT CORRECT DECODER WIRES
TO VALVE SOLENOID WIRES
7 5
5CONNECT CORRECT DECODER WIRES TO
TWO WIRE CABLES.
101.25" CONDUIT FOR 2 WIRE CABLE
WITH LONG SWEEPS IN AND OUT OF
EACH VALVE BOX. SEAL ALL CONDUIT
OPENINGS WITH WATERPROFF
FOAM.
6 SCALE: NONE
TWO WIRE
CABLE
10" ROUND VALVE BOX
2-WIRE SPLICE BOX AT MAIN LINE TEE OR 3
WAY WIRE BRANCH
3M DBR/Y-6 OR
APPROVED EQUAL
WATERPROOF
CONNECTOR.
SCALE: NONE
4 1
2 3
42-WIRE PATH JACKETED/ TWISTED
TO NEXT DECODER
6 INSTALL 5/8" DIAMETER COPPER
GROUND ROD OF 8' LENGTH.
7 NOTE:
2-WIRE PATH JACKETED/ TWISTED FROM
CONTROLLER. ALLOW A 24" SLACK PER
DECODER
LIGHTNING ARRESTOR
1 2
3 4
7 5
1.25" CONDUIT FOR 2 WIRE CABLE
WITH LONG SWEEPS IN AND OUT OF
EACH VALVE BOX. SEAL ALL CONDUIT
OPENINGS WITH WATERPROOF
FOAM.
CONDUIT FOR
TWO WIRE CABLE.
SEAL OPENINGS WITH
WATERPROOF FOAM.
FINISH GRADE
SCALE: NONE
3IRRIGATION TWO WIRE PULL BOX
3M DBR/Y-6 OR APPROVED EQUAL
WATERPROOF SPLICE KIT (4 TOTAL)
11 10
BRICK-ONE ON EACH CORNER11
8 BRICK-ONE ON EACH CORNER8
PEA GRAVEL
BRICK-ONE ON
EACH CORNER
1 2
3 5
3"
1 6
3 FINISH GRADE
24" LOOP OF TWO WIRE CABLE.
SCHEDULE 40 U.L. LISTED PVC
CONDUIT
8 PEA GRAVEL OR 3/4" [20mm] DRAIN
ROCK - 4" [102mm] DEEP BELOW
VALVE (NO SOIL IN VALVE BOX).
8 2
5 BRICK-ONE ON EACH CORNER
4 7
7 SEAL ALL CONDUIT OPENINGS
WITH WATERPROOF FOAM.
9 9
GREY RECTANGULAR PLASTIC VALVE
BOX WITH BOLT DOWN LID. HEAT
BRAND "PB" INTO LID.
LIGHTNING ARRESTOR (MODEL
WT2W-LSP). 1 EVERY 500' FROM
STARTING FROM CONTROLLER.
TWO WIRE DECODER SYSTEMS MUST BE PROPERLY GROUNDED IN ORDER TO PROTECT AGAINST LIGHTNING SURGES. THE COMMUNICATION CABLE MUST BE GROUNDED NO FURTHER THAN 500' FROM ANY DECODER. THE SURGE DEVICE MUST BE A WEATHERTRAK MODEL WT2W-LSP. THE MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN THE SURGE ARRESTOR AND THE GROUND ROD SHOULD BE 3' (91.4CM). WEATHERTRAK
RECOMMENDS A SPLIT BOLT CONNECTION TO BE USED TO CONNECT THE SURGE DEVICE TO THE GROUND WIRE WITH A 3M DBY-6 WATERPROOF CONNECTOR. 9 9GREY RECTANGULAR PLASTIC VALVE
BOX WITH BOLT DOWN LID. HEAT
BRAND "GR" INTO LID.
6 4
SCHEDULE 40 PVC SWEEP ELLS
18 GAUGE 1/2" [13mm] SQUARE
STAINLESS STEEL WIRE MESH.
6 518 GAUGE 1/2" [13mm] SQUARE
STAINLESS STEEL WIRE MESH.
01.06.2023 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMITTAL
05.01.2023 RESPONSE TO DESIGN REVIEW
3000
SHATTUCK
ALL DRAWINGS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL APPEARING
HEREIN CONSTITUTE ORIGINAL AND UNPUBLISHED
WORK OF THE ARCHITECT AND MAY NOT BE
DUPLICATED, USED OR DISCLOSED WITHOUT WRITTEN
CONSENT OF TRACHTENBERG ARCHITECTS.
2104 JOB:
SHEET:
2421 Fourth Street
Berkeley, California 94710
510.649.1414
www.TrachtenbergArch.com
TRACHTENBERG
ARCHITECTS
03.09.2021 REVISED BASE PLANS
3000 Shattuck Ave
Berkeley, CA
landscape architecture
6000 Harwood Ave
Oakland CA 94618
www.aboutinsideout.com
07.08.2022 ZONING INCOMPLETE RESPONSE
IRRIGATION
DETAIL
I1.5
SCALE: NONE
1HLD DRIPLINE CENTER FEED LAYOUT
SCALE: NONE
2HLD DRIPLINE END FEED LAYOUT
SCALE: NONE
3HLD DRIPLINE ISLAND LAYOUT
SCALE: NONE
6HLD DRIPLINE CENTER FEED MANIFOLD
PLAN
FV
FV
AV
11 10
8 9
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 FLUSH VALVE PLUMBED TO
FLUSH MANIFOLD AT LOW
POINT
MANIFOLD-TO-ELBOW
CONNECTION (TYP).
PVC LATERAL LINE FROM
VALVE. MINIMUM SIZE TO
BE 1" UNLESS OTHERWISE
NOTED.
PVC SUPPLY MANIFOLD.
EXTEND TO END OF
ZONE/EXHAUST HEADER.
MANIFOLD-TO-TEE
CONNECTION.
DRIPLINE LATERAL.
AIR/VACUUM RELIEF
LATERAL, BLANK POLY
TUBING CENTERED ON
MOUND OR BERM.
AIR/VACUUM RELIEF
PLUMBED TO BLANK 5/8"
POLY TUBING AT EACH
HIGH POINT.
PERIMETER LATERALS 2"
[50mm] TO 4" [100mm]
FROM EDGE.
AREA PERIMETER.
12DRIPLINE OPERATION
INDICATOR LOCATED AT
THE ENDS OF EACH
DRIPLINE ZONE.
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12 1 2
PLAN
7 6
5 4
3 2
1 9
8 10
11 12
13 14
PVC TEE (SxSxS).
PVC ELL (SxS).
HUNTER PLD-ELBOW
(PLD-ELB)
HUNTER PLD-TEE (PLD-TEE).
BLANK 5/8" [16mm] POLY
TUBING AT SUPPLY AND
FLUSH END OF EACH
ISLAND.
REFER TO DRIPLINE TO PVC
CONNECTION DETAIL.
AIR/VACUUM RELIEF VALVE
PLUMBED TO TUBING AT
HIGH POINT.
DRIPLINE LATERAL.
MANUAL FLUSH VALVE
PLUMBED TO TUBING AT
LOW POINT.
DRIPLINE OPERATION
INDICATOR LOCATED AT
THE ENDS OF EACH
DRIPLINE ZONE.
ISLAND PERIMETER.
PERIMETER LATERALS 2"
[50mm] TO 4" [100mm]
FROM EDGE.
FV
FV
AV
FV
AV
AV
14 12
13 4
3 2
1 567
8 9
1011
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 ISOMETRIC
9 8
7 6
5 4
3 1
2 NOTE:
THE TOTAL LENGTH OF A SINGLE DRIP LINE RUN SHALL NOT EXCEED 300 FT.
FINISH GRADE.
DEPTH OF TUBING PER
IRRIGATION LEGEND.
DEPTH OF PVC LATERAL LINE
PER IRRIGATION LEGEND
DRIPLINE TUBING.
BLANK 5/8" [16mm] POLY
TUBING, LENGTH AS
NECESSARY.
PVC TEE (SxSxT) WITH 1/2" [13mm]
FPT OUTLET.
PVC LATERAL LINE FROM REMOTE
CONTROL VALVE.
11 10
8 9
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 PLAN
MANIFOLD-TO-ELBOW
CONNECTION (TYP).
DRIPLINE LATERAL.
AIR/VACUUM RELIEF VALVE
PLUMBED TO BLANK 5/8"
TUBING AT EACH HIGH
POINT.
AIR/VACUUM RELIEF
LATERAL, BLANK 5/8" POLY
TUBING CENTERED ON
MOUND OR BERM.
PERIMETER LATERALS 2"
[50mm] TO 4" [100mm]
FROM EDGE.
AREA PERIMETER.
DRIP OPERATION
INDICATOR LOCATED AT
THE ENDS OF EACH
DRIPLINE ZONES.
FLUSH VALVE PLUMBED TO
FLUSH MANIFOLD AT LOW
POINT.
FV
AV
10 9
8 7
6 5
4 3
2 1
11 NOTE:
1. THE TOTAL LENGTH OF ALL INTERCONNECTED DRIP LINE OFF A SINGLE PVC
SUPPLY LINE CONNECTION OR A SINGLE RUN OF DRIPLINE SHALL NOT EXCEED 300 FT.
2. INSTALL DRIPLINE 2-4" BELOW GRADE AND STAKE DOWN EVERY 4' OR AS REQUIRED.
NOTE:
1. THE TOTAL LENGTH OF A SINGLE DRIP LINE RUN SHALL NOT EXCEED 300 FT.
2. INSTALL DRIPLINE 2-4" BELOW GRADE AND STAKE DOWN EVERY 4' OR AS REQUIRED.
PVC FLUSH MANIFOLD.
MINIMUM SIZE TO BE 1"
UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
PVC LATERAL LINE FROM
VALVE. MINIMUM SIZE TO
BE 1" UNLESS OTHERWISE
NOTED.
PVC LATERAL LINE FROM
VALVE. MINIMUM SIZE TO
BE 1" UNLESS OTHERWISE
NOTED.
PVC FLUSH MANIFOLD.
MINIMUM SIZE TO BE 1"
UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
1" FLEXIBLE PVC IPS HOSE
FLUSH MANIFOLD.
1" FLEXIBLE PVC IPS HOSE
FLUSH MANIFOLD.
NOT TO SCALE
SECTION
AV
FV
NOT TO SCALE
PLAN
AV
FV
7 6
5 4
3 2
1 8
9 10
4 7
11 NOTE:
1. THE TOTAL LENGTH OF ALL INTERCONNECTED DRIP LINE OFF A SINGLE PVC
SUPPLY LINE CONNECTION OR A SINGLE RUN OF DRIPLINE SHALL NOT EXCEED 300 FT.
2. INSTALL DRIPLINE 2-4" BELOW GRADE AND STAKE DOWN EVERY 4' OR AS REQUIRED.
NOTE:
1. THE TOTAL LENGTH OF ALL INTERCONNECTED DRIP LINE OFF A SINGLE PVC
SUPPLY LINE CONNECTION OR A SINGLE RUN OF DRIPLINE SHALL NOT EXCEED 300 FT.
2. INSTALL DRIPLINE 2-4" BELOW GRADE AND STAKE DOWN EVERY 4' OR AS REQUIRED.
SCALE: NONE
4HLD DRIPLINE TRIANGULAR LAYOUT
11 10
8 9
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 FLUSH VALVE PLUMBED TO
FLUSH MANIFOLD AT LOW
POINT
PVC LATERAL LINE FROM
VALVE. MINIMUM SIZE TO
BE 1" UNLESS OTHERWISE
NOTED.
PVC SUPPLY MANIFOLD.
DRIPLINE LATERAL.
PERIMETER LATERALS 2"
[50mm] TO 4" [100mm]
FROM EDGE.
AREA PERIMETER.
DRIPLINE OPERATION
INDICATOR LOCATED AT
THE ENDS OF EACH
DRIPLINE ZONE.
1" SCH 40 PVC OR FLEXIBLE
PVC IPS HOSE FLUSH
MANIFOLD.
MANIFOLD-TO-ELBOW
CONNECTION.
HUNTER PLD AIR/VACUUM
RELIEF VALVE (PLD-AVR)
PLUMBED TO SUPPLY
MANIFOLD AT HIGH POINT.
SCALE: NONE
DRIPLINE TO PVC CONNECTION7
REFER TO
IRRIGATION
LEGEND
4"
1FINISH GRADE
12 3
4 5
8 7
6 9
2CARSON 708 OR EQUAL.
COLOR: BLACK. USE PURPLE
FOR RECYCLED WATER
SYSTEMS.
3DRIPLINE TUBING
4 5TORO 1/2" CHECK VALVE
(PCV-500)
61/2" SCH 40 MALE
ADAPTER.
7 8
BRICK (1 OF 2)
1/2" SCH 40 PVC (LENGTH AS
REQUIRED)
9PVC LATERAL LINE SUPPLY.
MINIMUM SIZE TO BE 1" UNLESS
SIZED DIFFERENTLY ON
DRAWINGS. USE SCH 40 PVC
1"x1"x1/2" TEE OR 90° ELBOW.
HUNTER PLD-TEE (PLD-TEE)
NOTE:
1. THE TOTAL LENGTH OF ALL INTERCONNECTED DRIP LINE OFF A SINGLE PVC
SUPPLY LINE CONNECTION OR A SINGLE RUN OF DRIPLINE SHALL NOT EXCEED 300 FT.
2. INSTALL DRIPLINE 2-4" BELOW GRADE AND STAKE DOWN EVERY 4' OR AS REQUIRED.
SCALE: NONE
5HLD DRIPLINE ODD CURVE LAYOUT
10 8
9 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
FLUSH VALVE PLUMBED TO
FLUSH MANIFOLD AT LOW
POINT
PVC SUPPLY LINE/HEADER
FROM VALVE. MINIMUM
SIZE TO BE 1" UNLESS
OTHERWISE NOTED.
DRIPLINE LATERAL.
PERIMETER LATERALS 2"
[50mm] TO 4" [100mm]
FROM EDGE.
AREA PERIMETER.
DRIPLINE OPERATION
INDICATOR LOCATED AT
THE ENDS OF EACH
DRIPLINE ZONE.
1" SCH 40 PVC OR FLEXIBLE
PVC IPS HOSE
FLUSH/EXHAUST MANIFOLD.
MANIFOLD-TO-ELBOW
CONNECTION.
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 9
8 4
10 SCALE: NONE
8DRIPLINE MANIFOLD TO ELBOW CONNECTION
1 2
3 4
5 6 FINISH GRADE
DRIPLINE TUBING
SECTION/ELEVATION
NOT TO SCALE
1 8
23 6
5 7
4 DEPTH OF TUBING PER
IRRIGATION LEGEND.
7SCH 40 PVC TEE (SxSxT)
WITH 1/2" FPT OUTLET.
8DEPTH OF PVC LATERAL LINE
PER IRRIGATION LEGEND
HUNTER PLD AIR/VACUUM
RELIEF VALVE (PLD-AVR)
PLUMBED TO SUPPLY
MANIFOLD AT HIGH POINT.
HUNTER PLD-TEE (PLD-TEE)
HUNTER PLD-TEE (PLD-TEE)
HUNTER PLD-MPT ADAPTER
(PLD-050)
HUNTER PLD-MPT ADAPTER
(PLD-050) HUNTER PLD-ELBOW (PLD-ELB)
BLANK 5/8" [16mm] POLY
TUBING, LENGTH AS
NECESSARY.
HUNTER PLD-TEE X 1/2" FPT
ADAPTER
01.06.2023 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMITTAL
05.01.2023 RESPONSE TO DESIGN REVIEW
3000
SHATTUCK
ALL DRAWINGS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL APPEARING
HEREIN CONSTITUTE ORIGINAL AND UNPUBLISHED
WORK OF THE ARCHITECT AND MAY NOT BE
DUPLICATED, USED OR DISCLOSED WITHOUT WRITTEN
CONSENT OF TRACHTENBERG ARCHITECTS.
2104 JOB:
SHEET:
2421 Fourth Street
Berkeley, California 94710
510.649.1414
www.TrachtenbergArch.com
TRACHTENBERG
ARCHITECTS
03.09.2021 REVISED BASE PLANS
3000 Shattuck Ave
Berkeley, CA
landscape architecture
6000 Harwood Ave
Oakland CA 94618
www.aboutinsideout.com
07.08.2022 ZONING INCOMPLETE RESPONSE
IRRIGATION
DETAIL
I1.6
SCALE: NONE
DRIPLINE-FLUSH POINT2
NOTE:
ALLOW A MINIMUM OF PVC HOSE IN
VALVE BOX IN ORDER TO DIRECT FLUSHED
WATER OUTSIDE VALVE BOX.
24 5
1 67
1/2" SCH 40 THREADED BALL VALVE.
6" ROUND PLASTIC VALVE BOX.
PEA GRAVEL SUMP (6" DEEP).
FINISH GRADE
3 1/2" SCH 40 MALE ADAPTER.
SCALE: NONE
ON STRUCTURE STUB-OUT WITH BRONZE BALL
VALVE3
1 1
2 3
4 8
7 BRONZE BALL VALVE.
6 10
9 COPPER 90° ELBOW.
COPPER MALE ADAPTER.
CONDUIT FOR CONTROL WIRES
THROUGH STRUCTURE PROVIDED BY
ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR.
WATERPROOF ALL PENETRATIONS
COPPER PIPE THROUGH STRUCTURE
PROVIDED BY PLUMBING
CONTRACTOR. WATERPROOF ALL
PENETRATIONS.10
24 7
9 6
SCH 40 PVC MALE ADAPTER.
3 SLOPED ROOF BELOW PEDESTAL
SYSTEM
5 5
PVC MAIN LINE TO REMOTE CONTROL
VALVES.
ROOF DECK PAVERS8
11 1110" ROUND PLASTIC VALVE BOX. CUT
BOX TO FIT BELOW PEDESTAL PAVER
SYSTEM
TWO-WIRE CABLE OR CONTROL
WIRES
SCALE: NONE
1DRIPLINE OPERATION INDICATOR
4 ECO INDICATOR
5 FINISHED GRADE
6 MULCH
PVC LATERAL PIPE OR DRIPLINE
3 4
5 6
UPC APPROVED SCHEDULE 40 PVC TEE, ELBOW OR BARB x THREAD DRIP FITTING TEE OR ELBOW WITH 3/4" OUTLET.
1 2
3 1/2" X 3/4" X 6" HUNTER SWING JOINT (SJ-7506)2
1 1
2 1" IPS PVC HOSE FROM EXHAUST HEADER.
BRICK (1 OF 2)
6 5
4 3
7 SCALE: NONE
6TREE BUBBLER
UPHILL
TREE BUBBLER PLACEMENT EXAMPLES
UPHILL
LEVEL GRADE SLOPED GRADE
1 4
5 6
7 8
BUBBLER (TO BE INSTALLED ON TOP
OF ROOTBALL).
FINISH GRADE.
TREE OR SHRUB ROOTBALL.
1/2" IPS FLEXIBLE PVC. USE WELD-ON
795 SOLVENT CEMENT OR EQUAL
WHEN BONDING PVC HOSE TO
FITTINGS.
PVC TEE (SST), ELBOW (ST) OR FEMALE
ADAPTER.
PVC LATERAL LINE.
TREE.
EDGE OF ROOTBALL (TYPICAL).
10 11
1 5
6 7
8 10
11 1/2" SCH. 40 MALE ADAPTER
(2 TOTAL).
2 3
2 4
36" STAPLE.
9 TREE STAKES.9
1 NOTE:
SUGGESTED QUANTITY OF BUBBLERS
PER TREES AND SHRUBS SIZE:
·15 GAL OR 24" BOX = 2
BUBBLERS
·36" OR 48" BOX = 4 BUBBLERS
REFER TO
IRRIGATION
LEGEND
SCALE: NONE
5VALVE BOX INSTALLATION
A1
12" TYPICAL
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. CENTER VALVE BOX OVER REMOTE CONTROL VALVE TO FACILITATE SERVICING VALVE.
2. SET BOXES 1" ABOVE FINISH GRADE OR MULCH COVER IN GROUND COVER/SHRUB AREA AND FLUSH WITH FINISH GRADE IN TURF AREA.
3. SET RCV AND VALVE BOX ASSEMBLY IN GROUND COVER/SHRUB AREA WHERE POSSIBLE. INSTALL IN LAWN ONLY IF GROUND COVER DOES NOT EXIST ADJACENT TO LAWN.
4. SET BOXES PARALLEL TO EACH OTHER AND PERPENDICULAR TO EDGE OF LAWN, WALK, FENCE, CURB, ETC.
5. AVOID HEAVILY COMPACTING SOIL AROUND VALVE BOXES TO PREVENT COLLAPSE AND DEFORMATION OF VALVE BOX SIDES.
6. INSTALL EXTENSION BY VALVE BOX MANUFACTURER AS REQUIRED TO COMPLETELY ENCLOSE ASSEMBLY FOR EASY ACCESS.
12"
1CONTROLLER ID.
3RECTANGULAR VALVE BOX.
ROUND VALVE BOX FOR QCV
AND GATE VALVE. HEAT BRAND
VALVE TYPE INTO INTO LID PER
TABLE.
EDGE OF LAWN, WALK, FENCE,
CURB, ETC.
1 TREE
2 2ALL TREE VALVES TO HAVE TREE
BRANDED INTO LID.
3 VALVE IDENTIFICATION
12" 12"
5 5
TOP VIEW OF BOXES
7 7
ITEMS TO BRAND:BRAND CODE
GATE VALVEGV
PRESSURE REDUCERPRV
MASTER VALVEMV
FLOW SENSORFS
SPLICE BOXSB
QUICK COUPLERQC
PULL BOXPB
LIGHTNING ARRESTORLA
MAIN LINE AIR RELIEFARV
HYDROMETERHM
GROUND RODGR
REMOTE CONTROL VALVE A___
XX A1
4 4HEAT BRAND VALVE TYPE PER
TABLE OR CONTROLLER ID AND
STATION NUMBER INTO LID.
6 6STATION NUMBER.
SCALE: NONE
4TRENCHING
2 1
3 5
6 CLEAN BACKFILL MATERIAL.
FINISH GRADE.
LATERAL LINE.
MAIN LINE.
TWO WIRE CABLE IN CONDUIT
43" DETECTABLE WARNING TAPE OVER MAIN LINE. INSTALL 3" ABOVE MAIN LINE.
USE CHRISTY MODEL #TA-DT-3-BIRR FOR POTABLE IRRIGATION SYSTEMS OR #TA-DT-3-PRW FOR RECYCLED IRRIGATION WATER SYSTEMS
NOTES:
1. ALL MAIN SUPPLY LINES AND LATERAL LINES SHALL BE PLACED IN SLEEVES UNDER PAVED SURFACES. INSTALL LOW VOLTAGE WIRES WITHIN A SEPARATE CONDUIT UNDER PAVED SURFACES. DO NOT TAPE WIRES WITHIN CONDUIT.
2. REUSE SALVAGED EXCAVATED FILL AND COMPACT TO ORIGINAL DENSITY IN LANDSCAPE AREAS. ALL OTHER AREAS SHALL BE AT 95% COMPACTION. BACKFILL
MATERIAL SHALL BE THE EARTH EXCAVATED FROM THE TRENCHES, FREE FROM ROCKS (ANYTHING LARGER THAN 2"), CONCRETE CHUNKS, AND OTHER FOREIGN OR COARSE MATERIALS.
3. WHEN 12" POP-UP SPRINKLER HEADS ARE USED, INCREASE THE DEPTH OF LATERAL TO 18" AT THE SPRINKLER LOCATION ONLY.
8"-12"
MIN.
6"
MIN.
6"
MIN.6"-12"
MIN.
4"
18"
12"
4"
2 1
3 4
6 5
LATERAL, MAIN,
AND WIRES
MAIN AND
WIRES ONLY
LATERAL
ONLY
MULTIPLE
LATERALS
01.06.2023 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMITTAL
05.01.2023 RESPONSE TO DESIGN REVIEW
Voluminous
Attachment
Revised Addendum to the
Initial Study-Negative
Declaration
Attachment 1, Exhibit C to this report is on file and
available for review at the City Clerk Department, or
can be accessed from the City of Berkeley Website.
City Clerk Department
2180 Milvia Street
Berkeley, CA 94704
(510) 981-6900
or from:
The City of Berkeley’s Website
http://www.berkeleyca.gov
Attachment 1
Exhibit C
Attachment 2
Attachment 3
Attachment 4
3000 Shattuck Avenue Mixed-Use Project
Responses to Appeal Comments on the 2023
Addendum to the 2018 Initial Study-Negative
Declaration
SCH# 2017062025
prepared by
City of Berkeley
1947 Center Street, Second Floor
Berkeley, California 94704
Contact: Allison Riemer, Associate Planner, (510) 981-7433 prepared with the assistance of
Rincon Consultants, Inc.
66 Franklin Street, Suite 300
Oakland, California 94607
March 2025
Attachment 5
Table of Contents
Responses to Comments on the Addendum i
Table of Contents
1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................1
1.1 Purpose of the Response to Appeal Comments on the Addendum ...................................1
1.2 Environmental Review Process ...........................................................................................1
1.3 Document Organization ......................................................................................................1 2 Comments and Responses ..............................................................................................................2 3 Revisions to the Addendum ......................................................................................................... 20 Attachments
Attachment A Updated California Emissions Estimator Model Results
City of Berkeley
3000 Shattuck Avenue Mixed-Use Project
ii
This page intentionally left blank.
City of Berkeley Introduction
3000 Shattuck Avenue Mixed-Use Project
Responses to Comments on the Addendum
1 Introduction
1.1 Purpose of the Response to Appeal Comments on
the Addendum
This document contains responses to comments received on the Addendum to the 2018 Initial Study-Negative Declaration (IS-ND) prepared for the proposed 3000 Shattuck Mixed-Use Project (proposed project). The comments are associated with an appeal of the Zoning Adjustments Board’s (ZAB) 2023 approval of the project.
1.2 Environmental Review Process
The 2018 IS-ND was circulated for public review from June 12, 2017 to July 11, 2017 and was adopted by the ZAB in November 2018, when the project was approved by the Berkeley City Council. An Addendum to the 2018 IS-ND was prepared in 2023 to address subsequent changes to the original project including an increase in building height, removal of all automobile parking spaces, increase in residential units and square footage, increase in affordable units, increase in open space, and decrease in retail square footage. The Addendum was adopted and the project was approved by the ZAB at a hearing on May 11, 2023. The City of Berkeley received three letters in May and June 2023 appealing the approval of the project to the City Council, which included comments on the Addendum. The City directed Rincon to prepare this Responses to Comments document addressing appeal comments related to the Addendum and compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Copies of the appeal letters are included in Chapter 2 of this document.
1.3 Document Organization
This document consists of the following chapters:
Chapter 1: Introduction. This chapter discusses the purpose and organization of this response to comments document and summarizes the environmental review process for the project. Chapter 2: Written Comments and Responses. This chapter contains copies of the appeal letters. A written response is provided for each CEQA-related written comment in the letters.
Each response is keyed to the corresponding comment.
Chapter 3 Revisions to the IS-ND Addendum. Revisions to the Addendum that have been made in response to the comments received, or to otherwise provide clarity, are contained in this chapter and in the 2025 Revised Addendum, and are shown in underline and strikeout. 1
City of Berkeley Comments and Responses
3000 Shattuck Avenue Mixed-Use Project
Responses to Comments on the Addendum
2 Comments and Responses
This chapter includes written comments on the 2023 Addendum prepared for the 3000 Shattuck Avenue Mixed-Use Project as part of the appeal of the project approval, and responses to those comments. The commenters and the page number on which each commenter’s letter appear are listed below.
Letter No. and Commenter Page No.
1 Adam Frankel 3
2 Larisa Cummings et al 87
3 Kelilah D. Federman 109
The comment letters and responses follow. The comment letters have been numbered sequentially and each separate issue raised by the commenter, if more than one, has been assigned a number.
The responses to each comment identify first the number of the comment letter, and then the number assigned to each issue (Response 1.1, for example, indicates that the response is for the first issue raised in comment Letter 1). Responses are not provided to the letters attached to the appeal letters because they were addressed in a memorandum to ZAB on May 11, 2023, or the points are the same as those in the appeal letters.
In some cases, spec
ific changes to the text of the Add
endum have been made in response to
comments received. In no case do these revisions result in new significant impacts or impacts of a substantially greater severity than those identified in the 2018 IS-ND. Where revisions to the main text are called for, the page and paragraph of the Addendum are shown, followed by the text revision. Added text is indicated with underlining and deleted text is indicated with strikeout. Page numbers correspond to the page numbers of the 2025 revised Addendum. 2
DRURV T 510:8364200
F 510.836,4205
1939 Harrison Street, St4. 150
Oakland. CA 94612^
Via Email
May 19, 2023
City Clerk Department
Attn: Mark Numainville, City Clerk
City of Berkeley
2180 Milvia Street, 1st Floor
Berkeley, CA 94704
[email protected]
Re: Appeal of Zoning Adjustments Board Approval of the Addendum to the 2018 Initial Study-Negative Declaration for the 3000 Shattuck Avenue Project (State Clearinghouse # 2017062025) (Administrative Use Permit # ZP2022-0046) Dear Mr. Numainville:
I am writing on behalf of the Laborers International Union of North America, Local Union 304 and its members living in the City of Berkeley (“LiUNA”), regarding the project known as 3000 Shattuck Avenue (Administrative Use Permit # ZP2022-0046), including all actions related or referring to the proposed development of a 10-story (114 feet) mixed-use building utilizing a Density Bonus, with 166 dwellings, including 17 Very Low-Income units, and 1,043 square-feet of commercial space, located at 3000 Shattuck Avenue in the City of Berkeley, California (the “Project”).
The Project was approved by the Zoning Adjustments Board (“ZAB”) at a public hearing on May 11, 2023. LiUNA wishes to appeal the ZAB’s approval to the City Council for further review pursuant to Berkeley Municipal Code Section 23.410.030. LiUNA is concerned by the City’s improperuse of an Addendum which, if approved, would violate the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”). This letter incorporates by reference and adopts in their entirety the May 5, 2023 letter and exhibits submitted by LiUNA (attached as Exhibit A) and the May 9, 2023 letter and exhibits submitted by East Bay Residents for Responsible Development (attached as Exhibit B).
In November 2018, the City approved the Project and adopted an Initial Study and Negative Declaration (“2018 IS-ND”) for a prior iteration of the Project, which included 44 units and was 5 stories high (“2018 Project”). Now, the City has approved an Addendum to allow the development of a 10-story building with 166 units (“2023 Project”). The 2018 IS-ND did not consider the significant environmental impacts that would result from the increased scale of the new Project nor did it consider new information of substantial importance which LiUNA and 1 2
3 Appeal Letter 1
3
4 5
6 7
8 9
3, con't
4
9, con't
10 May 19, 2023
Appeal of the Zoning Adjustments Board Approval
Re: Addendum to the IS-ND for the 3000 Shattuck Avenue Project
development projects create individual and cumulative impacts, including changes in, and in many cases deterioration of, the visual environment; an increase in noise, air and water pollution levels; new and increased traffic and parking impacts; power, sewer and other utility demand and consumption; loss of valuable open space; and increased demands on parks, schools, libraries, police, fire and public facilities, services and amenities;...
When such impacts are not mitigated, Municipal Code Section 22.20.020(G) goes on to state that these and other “impacts generated by development projects, unless mitigated, are detrimental to the City’s public health, safety and general welfare....” Here, the Addendum violates the Municipal Code because it fails to mitigate the Project’s detrimental impacts to air quality.
CONCLUSION
The use of an Addendum to approve the proposed Project violates CEQA. An Addendum is not appropriate “if the proposed modification may produce a significant environmental effect that had not previously been studied.” (Friends of College of San Mateo Gardens v. San Mateo County Community College Dist. (2016) 1 Cal.5th 937, 958.
Based on the foregoing, there is a fair argument that the Project will have numerous significant environmental impacts which have not been previously considered. These impacts were not adequately analyzed or mitigated by the Addendum nor by the 2018 IS-ND.
LiUNA therefore respectfully requests that the City Council grant its appeal and overturn the ZAB’s approval of the Addendum. Thereafter, the City should return the Project to the Planning and Development Department for further consideration of its environmental impacts, including the necessary preparation and public review of either an MND or an EIR.
Sincerely,
Adam Frankel
LOZEAU |DRURY LLP
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
City of Berkeley Comments and Responses
3000 Shattuck Avenue Mixed-Use Project
Responses to Comments on the Addendum
Letter 1
COMMENTER: Adam Frankel
DATE: May 19, 2023
Response 1.1
The commenter states that he represents the Laborers International Union of North America, Local Union 304 and its members living in the City of Berkeley (LiUNA). This comment does not pertain to the adequacy of the information, analysis, or conclusions in the Addendum.
Response 1.2
The commenter states that LiUNA wishes to appeal the ZAB’s approval of the project to the City Council due to the “improper use of an Addendum.”
As discussed in Section 3, Decision Not to Prepare Subsequent Negative Declaration or EIR, of the Addendum, pursuant to Section 15164 of the CEQA Guidelines, a lead agency may prepare an addendum to a previously certified negative declaration if some changes or additions are necessary, but none of the conditions described in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 calling for preparation of a subsequent EIR or negative declaration have occurred. The Addendum acknowledges that the modified project would result in changes in density and intensity compared to the original project, and explains based on substantial evidence that the modified project would not require major revisions to the 2018 IS-ND due to new or substantially more severe significant environmental impacts that were not identified in the 2018 Final IS-ND, and that there are no substantial changes in the project or circumstances or new information of substantial importance that would cause the project to have significant new impacts or substantially increase previously identified significant impacts. None of the conditions described in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 that would call for preparation of a subsequent EIR or subsequent negative declaration have occurred or would occur because of the modified project. Therefore, the Addendum is the appropriate level of environmental documentation to provide under CEQA.
Response 1.3
The commenter states that the 2018 IS-ND did not consider the significant environmental impacts that would result from the increased scale of the modified project or consider new information of substantial importance which LiUNA and others have presented regarding the modified project’s significant environmental effects. The commenter states that to comply with CEQA, an IS-MND or an EIR should have been prepared.
Please refer to Response 1.2.
Response 1.4
The commenter states that interior composite wood materials in the proposed building would emit off-gas indoor air emissions of formaldehyde, resulting in significant health risks to future residents.
The commenter states that the Addendum and the 2018 IS-ND did not consider or mitigate this significant impact.
In response to this comment, Section 4.3, Air Quality, of the Addendum has been revised to include a discussion of formaldehyde. The revisions are shown in Chapter3 of this document. 84
City of Berkeley Comments and Responses
3000 Shattuck Avenue Mixed-Use Project
Responses to Comments on the Addendum
Response 1.5
The commenter states that the project site is listed on the State Water Resources Control Board’s Geotracker database and is included on a Cortese List pursuant to the California Government Code Section 65962.5. The commenter states that the Addendum incorrectly states the site’s cleanup case is “closed” because it only met commercial or industrial screening levels and not residential screening levels.
In response to this comment, Section 4.7, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, has been revised to include a discussion of residential screening levels. As discussed therein, the two closed investigations on the site were closed in 2013 and 2014, before the site was considered for residential use. Further research was done after the site closure, including the 2022 Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA). Section 4.7, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, now contains additional information, including that concentrations of detected compounds in soil samples were all below their respective residential and commercial/industrial San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board (SFBRWQCB) groundwater vapor intrusion environmental screening levels (ESLs), except for arsenic. However, the range of arsenic concentrations found were within regional background concentrations and therefore was determined to be naturally occurring. The revisions are listed in Chapter 3 of this document.
Response 1.6
The commenter states that the modified project may result in potentially significant Reactive Organic Gas (ROG) emissions which would exceed Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) thresholds.
In response to this comment, Section 4.3, Air Quality, of the Addendum has been revised to include a discussion of air quality emissions modeling (CalEEMod) methodology and updated ROG emissions. As shown in Table 1, ROG emissions during both construction and operation would be below BAAQMD thresholds of 54 pounds per day. The revisions are listed in Chapter3 of this document.
Response 1.7
The commenter states that the Addendum underestimates the modified project’s air emissions by altering the estimated length of construction and failing to account for demolition.
As explained in Section 2, Project Description, and Section 4.3, Air Quality, of the Addendum, the duration of construction is expected to occur within an 18-month period, which also accounts for the demolition phase. This is also reflected in the updated Appendix A, CalEEMod modeling results, included as Attachment A to this document.
Response 1.8
The commenter states that the Addendum and the 2018 IS-ND did not analyze potentially significant air quality impacts resulting from the trucking of modular units to the project site.
In response to this comment, Section 4.3, Air Quality, of the Addendum has been revised to include a discussion of air quality impacts resulting from the trucking of modular units to the project site.
Construction modeling for the building construction phase includes 17.9 one-way vendor trips per day, which over a 321-day phase length equates to 5,745 vendor trips and over 48,000 vendor trucking miles during this phase. Long-range trucking was not analyzed in this analysis, as it was 85
City of Berkeley Comments and Responses
3000 Shattuck Avenue Mixed-Use Project
Responses to Comments on the Addendum
assumed those emissions were considered out of the range of considerable direct or indirect effects. CEQA only requires analysis of impacts that are directly or indirectly attributable to the project under consideration (State CEQA Guidelines, § 15064(d)). There is no indication that long- range trucking beyond that analyzed here would be directly related to or caused by the project.
The included emissions were those reasonably estimated to be related directly or indirectly to the pro
ject under consideration. Pote
ntial long-range trucking may be necessary for numerous different projects as a result of general market demand, regardless of whether this project would proceed or not. Thus, such emissions may not be “caused by” the project under consideration. Similarly, a lead agency may not be able to require mitigation for emissions that result out of the scope of the project under consideration; mitigation can only be required for emissions that are actually caused by the project (State CEQA Guidelines, § 15126.4(a)(4)). This approach was discussed in detail with the removal of the term “lifecycle” from Appendix F of the CEQA Guidelines in the California Natural Resources Agency’s December 2009 Final Statement of Reasons for Regulatory Action: Amendments to the State CEQA Guidelines Addressing Analysis and Mitigation of Greenhouse Gas Emissions Pursuant to SB97. It is similarly consistent with the “lifecycle” discussion in the California Department of Transportation’s February 2019 CEQA Guidelines Update.
Therefore, the Addendum is an appropriate informational document under CEQA with regard to air quality emissions. The revisions are listed in Chapter 3 of this document.
Response 1.9
The commenter states that the Addendum violates Berkeley Municipal Code Section 22.20.020(F) because it fails to mitigate the modified project’s detrimental impacts to air quality.
As explained in Section 4.3, Air Quality, of the Addendum, the modified project’s estimated air pollutant emissions would not exceed BAAQMD’s thresholds and impacts related to criteria air pollutants or contribution to a cumulative air quality impact would be less than significant. In addition, compliance with the City’s standard condition of approval, Air Quality – Diesel Particulate Matter Controls During Construction, as well as proximity to alternative transportation would ensure less than significant impacts related to construction and operational toxic air contaminants (TACs).
Therefore, impacts related to air quality would be less than significant, like the original project, and no significant new or substantially increased air quality impacts would occur.
Response 1.10
The commenter restates that the use of an Addendum is inappropriate and states, without citing substantial evidence, that there is a fair argument that the modified project would result in significant impacts that have not been previously analyzed. The commenter requests that the City Council grant the appeal and overturn the ZAB’s approval of the Addendum.
There is no substantial evidence in support of the commenter’s arguments. Please refer to Responses 1.2 – 1.9.
86
CITY OF BERKELEY -CITY CLERK
2023 MAY 31pm2:26
City Council, City of Berkeley
2180 Milvia Street
Berkeley, CA 94704
May 31, 2023
Hand-delivered to City Clerk’s Office
Emailed to [email protected]:
[email protected]
Dear City Council Members:
This an appeal of the May 11, 2023 decision of the Zoning Adjustments Board (“ZAB”) to issue a Use Permit for the project known as 3000 Shattuck, ZP#2022-00046! (“Project”), on all the grounds stated in the May 9, 2023 Objections (“Objections”, copied below), which were provided to ZAB by a group of neighbors to the Project. The grounds are summarized here with further arguments following the ZAB meeting:
There can be no dispute that the City has failed to perform the required cumulative impact analysis. City Council must deny the Use Permit and direct the City to perform a proper CEQA analysis as required by law, including, but not limited to, the following.
1. Applicable Law
• State law SB330 expressly requires the City to comply with CEQA per Govt.
Code Section 65589.5(e).
• CEQA requires an “Initial Study” per CEQA Guidelines (“Guidelines”), Title 14, California Code of Regulations, Sections 15063-15365.
• The purpose of the Initial Study is to determine whether there may be a significant environmental impact. Id. “Careful judgment [...] based on scientific and factual data" is required. Guidelines Section 15064(b)(1). Under Section 15064(b)(2), “[t]hresholds of significance, as defined in Section 15064(a), may assist lead agencies in determining whether a project may cause a significant impact. When using a threshold, the lead agency should briefly explain how compliance with the threshold means that the project's impacts are less than significant. Compliance with the threshold does not relieve a lead agency of the obligation to consider substantial evidence indicating that the project's environmental effects may still be significant.” (emphasis added) • Under Guidelines Section 15065(a), the City is required to find that a project may have a significant effect on the environment and thereby require an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) to be prepared for the project “where there is 1 1
2 3
4 Appeal Letter 2
87
4, con't
5 6
7 88
8 9
89
9, con't
10 11
90
11, con't
12 91
13 92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
City of Berkeley Comments and Responses
3000 Shattuck Avenue Mixed-Use Project
Responses to Comments on the Addendum
Letter 2
COMMENTER: Larisa Cummings et al
DATE: May 31, 2023
Response 2.1
The commenter states her intent to appeal the May 11, 2023 decision of the ZAB.
This comment does not pertain to the adequacy of the information, analysis, or conclusions in the Addendum.
Response 2.2
The commenter states that the City has failed to perform a cumulative impact analysis and urges the City Council to deny the Use Permit.
In response to this comment, Section 4.15, Changes in the Environmental Setting and Cumulative Impacts has been added to the 2025 revised Addendum, which includes an analysis of cumulative impacts. The revisions are shown in Chapter 3 of this document. Section 4.15, Changes in the Environmental Setting and Cumulative Impacts, analyzes eight cumulative development projects within 2 miles of the modified project. As discussed in Section 4.15, the modified project would not contribute to cumulatively considerable impacts in any environmental issue area and impacts would be less than significant.
Response 2.3
The commenter states that CEQA requires an Initial Study and provides a summary of the purpose of the Initial Study.
An Initial Study was prepared for the original project in 2018. As discussed in Section 3, Decision Not to Prepare Subsequent Negative Declaration or EIR, of the Addendum, pursuant to Section 15164 of the CEQA Guidelines, a lead agency shall prepare an addendum to a previously certified negative declaration if some changes or additions are necessary, but none of the conditions described in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 calling for preparation of a subsequent EIR or negative declaration have occurred.
Response 2.4
The commenter states that the City is required to discuss cumulative impacts of the modified project which includes planned and approved projects, mentioning Ashby BART as an example.
Please refer to Response 2.2. 4.15, Changes in the Environmental Setting and Cumulative Impacts, added to the Addendum, analyzes eight cumulative development projects within 2 miles of the modified project, including the Ashby BART project. As discussed therein, the modified project would not result in considerable contributions to significant cumulative impacts and impacts would be less than significant.
Response 2.5
The commenter quotes CEQA Guidelines 15064(c) and states that the City must consider input from the public as part of its determination of whether to conduct an EIR. 105
City of Berkeley Comments and Responses
3000 Shattuck Avenue Mixed-Use Project
Responses to Comments on the Addendum
This comment does not pertain to the adequacy of the information, analysis, or conclusions in the Addendum. An Initial Study was prepared for the original project in 2018. The 2018 Final IS-ND was circulated for public review from June 12, 2017 to July 13, 2017. The original project was reviewed by the Zoning Adjustments Board (ZAB) in July 2017, May 2018, and June 2018, where the ZAB rejected the application for the original project. The modified project was submitted on December 14, 2021 and a revised Addendum was published on January 27, 2023. Public hearing notices were mailed and posted on April 27, 2023, and the ZAB hearing was on May 11, 2023. As discussed in Section 3, Decision Not to Prepare Subsequent Negative Declaration or EIR, of the Addendum, pursuant to Section 15164 of the CEQA Guidelines, a lead agency shall prepare an addendum to a previously certified negative declaration if some changes or additions are necessary, but none of the conditions described in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 calling for preparation of a subsequent EIR or negative declaration have occurred.
Response 2.6
The commenter quotes CEQA Guidelines Section 15162(b) and states that if changes to a project or its circumstances occur or new information becomes available after adoption of a negative declaration, the lead agency shall prepare a subsequent EIR. Otherwise, the lead agency shall determine whether to prepare a subsequent negative declaration, an addendum, or no further documentation.
Please refer to Response 1.2.
Response 2.7
The commenter states that the 2018 IS-ND, Addendum, and May 5, 2023 Supplemental Analysis do not analyze cumulative impacts, and show no evidence of consideration of public input.
Please refer to Response 2.2 and Response 2.5. The 2018 Final IS-ND was circulated for public review from June 12, 2017 to July 13, 2017 and was adopted in November 2018. The 2023 Addendum was available for public review beginning in January 2023, and was attached to the ZAB staff report.
Response 2.8
The commenter states that 15 new projects were identified for cumulative analysis whereas the Addendum only analyzed four. In addition, the modified project proposes an increase in residential square footage and units, and a decrease in parking spaces. The commenter states that these conditions serve as new information.
Please refer to Response 2.2. Section 4.15, Changes in the Environmental Setting and Cumulative Impacts, added to the Addendum, analyzes eight cumulative development projects within 2 miles of the modified project, including the Ashby BART project. As discussed therein, the modified project would not result in considerable contributions to significant cumulative impacts and impacts would be less than significant.
The Addendum acknowledges and addresses whether the modified project would result in new or substantially more severe significant impacts due to proposed changes in density and intensity compared to the original project, and explains that the modified project would not introduce new, significant environmental impacts beyond those that have already been identified and characterized in the 2018 Final IS-ND and that there are no substantial changes in the project or circumstances or 106
City of Berkeley Comments and Responses
3000 Shattuck Avenue Mixed-Use Project
Responses to Comments on the Addendum
substantially important new information that would cause the project to have significant new impacts or substantially increase the severity of previously identified significant impacts.
Response 2.9
The commenter states that the modified project would result in construction and traffic impacts in the Russel-Shattuck-Ashby corridors where there are currently five proposed projects and one under construction. The commenter also states that this area may also become home to the three tallest projects at 9 to 10 stories.
In response to this comment, Section 4.13, Transportation, of the Addendum has been revised to include a discussion of construction traffic impacts. The revisions are listed in Chapter 3 of this document. As discussed therein, the modified project would be required to comply with the City’s Standard Condition of Approval, Transportation Construction Plan, which would require preparation of a Transportation Construction Plan for all phases of construction in order to minimize impacts related to construction traffic.
As outlined in Section 4.3, Air Quality, of the Addendum, the modified project would result in less than significant impacts related to construction criteria air pollutants and TACs with compliance with the City’s standard condition of approval, Air Quality – Diesel Particulate Matter Controls During Construction. As discussed in Section 4.9, Noise, of the Addendum, the modified project would result in less than significant impacts related to construction noise and vibration with compliance with the City’s standard conditions of approval, Damage Due to Construction Vibration, and Construction Noise Management – Public Notice Required. Therefore, impacts related to construction would be less than significant.
As outlined in Section 4.2, Aesthetics, of the Addendum, the modified project would result in less than significant impacts related to aesthetics since it would be located within 0.5 miles of a major transit stop (Ashby BART station). Because the modified project consists of residential development on an infill site within a transit priority area, aesthetics impacts may not be considered significant impacts on the environment. In addition, as discussed in Section 4.8, Land Use and Planning, of the Addendum, although the modified project would include 10 stories, the modified project would qualify for height waivers pursuant to State Density Bonus requirements. The project would comply with all other development standards as well as the City’s Inclusionary Housing Ordinance.
Response 2.10
The commenter states that the City’s project planner, consultant, and ZAB members incorrectly stated that it was the appellant’s responsibility to identify cumulative impacts regarding the project; the appellants asserted that an automatic finding of significant impact must be made; and no further action is needed to meet the requirements of CEQA.
This comment does not pertain to the adequacy of the information, analysis, or conclusions in the Addendum. Please refer to Response 2.2 and Section 4.15 of the Revised Addendum.
Response 2.11
The commenter provides excerpts s of the May 11, 2023 ZAB hearing transcript.
This comment does not pertain to the adequacy of the information, analysis, or conclusions in the Addendum.
107
City of Berkeley Comments and Responses
3000 Shattuck Avenue Mixed-Use Project
Responses to Comments on the Addendum
Response 2.12
The commenter states that the ZAB was misguided in its deliberations and discussion during the May 11, 2023 meeting and has overlooked several relevant laws, and urges for the decision to be reversed.
This comment does not pertain to the adequacy of the information, analysis, or conclusions in the Addendum.
Response 2.13
The commenter requests the City Council to deny the Use Permit and for the City to further review and analyze the modified project under CEQA and demonstrate its consideration of public input.
The modified project is analyzed in the 2018 IS-ND and the 2023 Addendum, as revised. This comment does not pertain to the adequacy of the information, analysis, or conclusions in the Addendum.
108
KEVIN T. CARMICHAEL
CHRISTINA M. CARO
THOMAS A. ENSLOW
KELILAH D. FEDERMAN
RICHARD M. FRANCO
ANDREW J. GRAF
TANYA A. GULESSERIAN
RACHAEL E. KOSS
AIDAN P. MARSHALL
TARA C. RENGIFO
Of Counsel
MARC D. JOSEPH
DANIEL L CARDOZO
ADAMS BROADWELL JOSEPH & CARDOZO
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
601 GATEWAY BOULEVARD, SUITE 1000
SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080-7037
TEL: (650) 589-1660
FAX: (650) 589-5062
kf ede rman@ a damsbroadwelI.com
June 1, 2023
SACRAMENTO OFFICE
520 CAPITOL MALL, SUITE 350
SACRAMENTO, CA 95814-4721
TEL: (916) 444-6201
FAX: (916) 444-6209
CITY OF BERKELEY -CITY CLERK
2023 JUN1pm4:24
Via Email and Hand Delivery Via Email Only
Mark Numainville
City Clerk
City of Berkeley
2180 Milvia Street, 1st Floor
Berkeley, CA 94704
Email: [email protected]
Berkeley City Council
2180 Milvia Street,
Berkeley, CA 94704
Jesse Arreguin, Mayor
Councilmembers: Rashi Kesarwani
Terry Taplin; Ben Bartlett
Kate Harrison; Sophie Hahn
Susan Wengraf; Rigel Robinson
Mark Humbert
Email: [email protected]
Re: Appeal of Zoning Adjustments Board’s Approval of 3000 Shattuck Avenue Project Use Permit #ZP2022-0046 and
Addendum to the 3000 Shattuck IS/ND (SCH# 2017062025)
Dear Mr. Numainville, Mayor Arreguin, Honorable Councilmembers: Kesarwani, Taplin, Bartlett, Harrison, Hahn, Wengraf, Robinson, and Humbert:
We are writing on behalf of East Bay Residents for Responsible Development (“East Bay Residents” or “Residents”) to appeal the Zoning Adjustment Board’s (“ZAB”) May 11, 2023 approval1 of the 3000 Shattuck Project (“Project”)2 Use Permit #ZP2022-0046 and approval of the Addendum to the 3000 Shattuck Avenue Project Initial Study Negative Declaration (SCH #2017062025)3 prepared by the City of Berkeley (the “City”) for the Project. The Project is proposed by Mark 1 City of Berkeley, Zoning Adjustment Board, Notice of Decision (May 11, 2023), https.;//w.ww,d.rQpbQx.c.om/s/860yr^^^ ZAB...N.QD. 300.Q%20Shat.tucX.pdW 2 City of Berkeley, Zoning Adjustment Board, Staff Report for Board Action May 11, 2023, https://berkeleyca.gov/sites/default/files/documents/2023-05- 11 ZAB Item%205 3000%20Shattuck Combined%20Staff%20Report%20and%20Att.achments.pdf (hereinafter “Staff Report”).
3 City of Berkeley, Addendum to the 3000 Shattuck Avenue Project Initial Study -Negative Declaration (Permit No. ZP2015-0229, SCH# 2017062025) (January 2023), https://www.dropbox.eom/s/kr0fme3neozjqyf/2023-01-27 CEQA Addendum%20to%20IS- ND 3000%20Shattuck.Ddf?dl=0 (hereinafter “Addendum”).
0154-0lOaep
Chprinted on recycled paper
Appeal Letter 3
ya9zcd3a/2023-05-18
1 109
1, con't
2 3
110
4 5
6 7
8 111
9 10
11 112
11, con't
12 13
14 113
14, con't
15 114
16 115
16,
con't
116
16,
con't
17 18
117
18,
con't
19 118
19,
con't
20 119
20,
con't
120
20,
con't
121
20,
con't
21 122
21,
con't
22 123
22,
con't
124
22,
con't
23 125
23,
con't
24 126
24,
con't
127
25 128
25,
con't
26 27
129
27,
con't
28 29
130
29,
con't
30 131
30,
con't
31 132
31,
con't
32 133
33 134
33,
con't
34 135
34,
con't
136
34,
con't
137
35 138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
City of Berkeley Comments and Responses
3000 Shattuck Avenue Mixed-Use Project
Responses to Comments on the Addendum
Letter 3
COMMENTER: Kelilah D. Federman
DATE: June 1, 2023
Response 3.1
The commenter states her intent to appeal the ZAB’s May 11, 2023 approval of the 2000 Shattuck Project on behalf of East Bay Residents for Responsible Development (East Bay Residents).
This comment does not pertain to the adequacy of the information, analysis, or conclusions in the Addendum.
Response 3.2
The commenter summarizes the description of the project.
This comment does not pertain to the adequacy of the information, analysis, or conclusions in the Addendum.
Response 3.3
The commenter states her intent to appeal ZAB’s May 11, 2023 decision to adopt the Addendum to the 2018 IS-ND and approve the Use Permit.
This comment does not pertain to the adequacy of the information, analysis, or conclusions in the Addendum.
Response 3.4
The commenter states that the ZAB’s decision to approve the modified project violated CEQA, land use laws, and the City’s municipal codes, and was not supported by substantial evidence in the record.
As discussed in Section 4.8, Land Use and Planning, of the Addendum, the modified project would not alter the land uses proposed in the original project and would be consistent with the Avenue Commercial designation, which is characterized by “pedestrian-oriented commercial development and multifamily residential structures” and General Plan policies. The modified project would comply with State Density Bonus requirements and therefore qualifies for waivers for height, setbacks, and FAR. It also complies with all other development standards, and would comply with the City’s Inclusionary Housing Ordinance. Therefore, the modified project would be consistent with land use plans, policies, and regulations such as General Plan policies and the BMC.
Response 3.5
The commenter states that the Addendum does not accurately disclose the extent of the modified project’s potentially significant air quality, public health, hazardous contamination, land use, and cumulative impacts, which are new or more severe than impacts analyzed in the 2018 IS-ND, and will not be substantially mitigated by the City’s standard conditions of approval.
Please refer to Response 1.9 regarding air quality impacts; Response 2.2 regarding cumulative impacts; and Response 3.4 regarding land use impacts.
190
City of Berkeley Comments and Responses
3000 Shattuck Avenue Mixed-Use Project
Responses to Comments on the Addendum
With regard to hazardous materials impact, as explained in Response 1.5 and in Section 4.7, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, of the Addendum, according to the Phase I and Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) Reports prepared by GEM Group, Inc on April 20, 2022 and October 10, 2022 (Appendix C), respectively, concentrations of compounds detected in soil samples were all below their respective residential and commercial/industrial San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board (SFBRWQCB) groundwater vapor intrusion environmental screening levels. In addition, the modified project would be required to comply with Berkeley’s standard condition of approval for hazardous materials, Toxics, which requires preparation of a Soil and Groundwater Management Plan to address health and safety, proper handling, and disposal of USTs and/or contaminated soil if encountered during site redevelopment. Therefore, impacts related to hazardous materials would be less than significant.
Response 3.6
The commenter states that the site is contaminated with benzene which exceeds the 2019 San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board’s (SFBRWQCB) groundwater vapor intrusion residential environmental screening levels.
As discussed in the Phase II ESA Report prepared by GEM Group, Inc. on October 10, 2022 (Appendix C), a 2010 closure summary report for the project site identified benzene as the only constituent that slightly exceeded its ESL. The closure summary report indicated that the one groundwater sample in which benzene was detected at a concentration exceeding its ESL was collected from a groundwater monitoring well located offsite, approximately 150 feet west of the project site; the most recent groundwater samples collected from onsite groundwater wells did not contain benzene at concentrations above the laboratory reporting limit. According to the closure summary report, “remediation through site upgrades, equipment removal and associated over-excavations, and natural attenuation have proven to be effective for removing on-site contamination” (ARCADIS 2010). Soil samples were analyzed as part of the Phase II ESA Report, which found that concentrations of detected compounds in soil samples were all below their respective residential and commercial/industrial ESLs except for arsenic. However, the range of arsenic concentrations found were within regional background concentrations and therefore was determined to be naturally occurring. In addition, the modified project would be required to comply 1with Berkeley’s
standard condition of approval for hazardous materials, Toxics, which requires preparation of a Soil and Groundwater Management Plan to address health and safety, proper handling, and disposal of USTs and/or contaminated soil if encountered during site redevelopment. The Soil and Groundwater Management Plan that is required with the building permit will address any issues relating to benzene in soil vapor if such issues are encountered during development. Therefore, impacts related to benzene would be less than significant.
Response 3.7
The commenter states that the project’s ROG emissions (71.55 pounds per day) would exceed BAAQMD’s threshold of 54 pounds per day.
As shown in Table 2 under Section 4.3, Air Quality, of the Addendum, the modified project would result in construction ROG emissions of 3.5 pounds per day, which would not exceed BAAQMD thresholds of 54 pounds per day.
1 ARCADIS. 2010. Case Closure Summary Report. Former British Petroleum Station #00414. June 9, 2010 https://documents.geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_report/8836282312/T0600100094.PDF 191
City of Berkeley Comments and Responses
3000 Shattuck Avenue Mixed-Use Project
Responses to Comments on the Addendum
Response 3.8
The commenter states that cumulative impacts associated with construction and operation constitute new impacts because recent development were not previously analyzed in the 2018 IS- ND.
Please refer to Response 2.2 regarding cumulative impacts. In addition, as explained in Response
1.9, BAAQMD states in its CEQA Air Quality Guidelines that the project-level thresholds of significance for criteria air pollutants, “are the levels at which the Air District has determined that an individual project’s contribution to the cumulative impact (non-attainment) is cumulatively considerable.” Therefore, because the modified project’s estimated air pollutant emissions are below BAAQMD’s thresholds of significance, the modified project’s contribution to a cumulative air quality impact would be less than significant.
Response 3.9
The commenter states that the modified project has been substantially changed from the original project by more than tripling the number of residential units and square footage, resulting in more severe construction and operational impacts.
The Addendum acknowledges that the modified project would result in changes in density and intensity compared to the original project, and explains that the modified project would not introduce new, significant environmental impacts beyond those that have already been identified and characterized in the 2018 Final IS-ND and that there are no substantial changes in the project or circumstances or new information of substantial importance that would require major revisions of the IS-ND due to significant new impacts or substantially more severe impacts than were previously identified.
Response 3.10
The commenter states that the Addendum was prepared in violation of CEQA and the court’s holding in Friends of College of San Mateo Gardens v. San Mateo County Community College District, which the court held that an Addendum was improperly prepared due to substantial evidence to support a fair argument that the project changes may result in a significant effect on the environment, and that a subsequent EIR should have been prepared.
Please refer to Response 1.2 for an explanation of the City’s decision not to prepare a subsequent EIR.
Response 3.11
The commenter states that the modified project may be detrimental to the general welfare of the city, residents, and workers, and has not made a commitment to ensure the modified project is built with local skilled and trained force.
This comment does not pertain to the adequacy of the information, analysis, or conclusions in the Addendum.
Response 3.12
The commenter states that the modified project is inconsistent with the General Plan because it does not include a commitment to provide construction jobs to Berkeley or East Bay residents and does not contribute to any apprenticeship or other construction job training programs. 192
City of Berkeley Comments and Responses
3000 Shattuck Avenue Mixed-Use Project
Responses to Comments on the Addendum
The commenter states that the project is inconsistent with the City’s Housing Element because the modified project does not provide 20 percent affordable units on-site. The commenter acknowledges that the modified project will pay an in-lieu fee but states that this places a burden on the City to identify adequate sites to construct affordable housing.
The comment regarding apprenticeship or construction jobs does not pertain to adequacy of the information, analysis, or conclusions in the Addendum.
The modified project would be consistent with the City’s Housing Element because although the modified project would not provide 20 percent affordable units on-site, pursuant to BMC Section
23.328.010(B)(1), in lieu of providing some or all of the affordable units required under Section
23.328.010 (including any fractional units), an applicant may elect to pay a fee, the amount of which the City Council may establish by resolution ("In-Lieu Fee"). The modified project would also add 166 units to the City’s housing stock, which would help the city satisfy its 2023-2031 Housing Element Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA).
Response 3.13
The commenter states that the ZAB incorrectly stated that the May 11, 2023 hearing was the final hearing allowed under the Housing Accountability Act’s (HAA) five-hearing limit and states that it was the second hearing.
This comment does not pertain to the adequacy of the information, analysis, or conclusions in the Addendum.
Response 3.14
The commenter requests for the City Council to grant the appeal and requests preparation of a subsequent EIR.
Please refer to Response 1.2 for an explanation behind the decision not to prepare a subsequent EIR.
Response 3.15
The commenter provides a statement of interest and states that the East Bay Residents will be directly affected by environmental and health and safety impacts.
As discussed throughout the Addendum, the modified project would result in less than significant impacts for all environmental issue areas, similar to the original project. There are no substantial changes in the project or circumstances or substantially important new information that would cause the project to have significant new impacts or substantially increase previously identified significant impacts. The modified project would be required to comply with the same City standards of conditions, General Plan policies, and BMC regulations as outlined in the 2018 IS-ND. Impacts to the environment and health and safety would be less than significant.
Response 3.16
The commenter cites the CEQA Guidelines and states that the City improperly prepared an Addendum instead of a subsequent EIR. The commenter states that the changes in the modified project constitute major revisions to the 2018 IS-ND since the number of residential units and square footage have been tripled. The commenter states that the modified project would result in 193
City of Berkeley Comments and Responses
3000 Shattuck Avenue Mixed-Use Project
Responses to Comments on the Addendum
new significant environmental impacts related to hazardous materials, air quality, and cumulative impacts.
Please refer to Responses 1. 9, 2.2, and 3.5.
Response 3.17
The commenter states that the Soil Water Air Protection Enterprise (SWAPE) provided substantial evidence that ROG emissions and construction and demolition may be significant and were not analyzed or mitigated in the 2018 IS-ND. In addition, the commenter states that hazards impacts from the modified project are more severe and cumulative impacts associated with development in the neighborhood that did not exist were not analyzed at the time the 2018 IS-ND was prepared.
Please refer to Response 1.6 regarding ROG emissions. SWAPE states that the modified project would result in a 2,285 percent increase in ROG emissions. However, they have not provided substantial evidence to support this number and did not include CalEEMod output files in the letter.
Please refer to Response 3.5 regarding hazardous materials. The modified project and future development in the project vicinity would be required to comply with the City’s Standard Condition of Approval for hazardous materials, Toxics. This Standard Condition of Approval requires preparation of a Soil and Groundwater Management Plan to address health and safety, proper handling, and disposal of underground storage tanks (USTs) and/or contaminated soil if encountered during site redevelopment. Therefore, cumulative impacts related to hazardous materials contamination would be less than significant.
Response 3.18
The commenter states that tripling the number of housing units and square footage and doubling the building height would result in substantially increased air quality, public health, hazards, and cumulative impacts, and a subsequent EIR should be prepared.
Please refer to Responses 1.9, 2.2, and 3.5.
Response 3.19
The commenter states that the ZAB rushed approval of the modified project out of false belief that failing to approve it would violate the HAA.
This comment does not pertain to the adequacy of the information, analysis, or conclusions in the Addendum.
Response 3.20
The commenter states that the project would result in substantially more severe impacts related to hazardous materials since the 2018 IS-ND, which relied on the site’s previous closure to commercial or industrial screening levels and not residential screening levels, and did not include mitigation measures requiring contamination levels to be cleaned to meet the residential environmental screening levels (ESLs). The commenter states that soil vapor levels and other residual contamination associated with releases of contaminants at the project site have not been fully analyzed or mitigated for a residential setting and may pose a significant risk to residents and workers. The commenter states that a subsequent EIR should be required.
Please refer to Response 3.6. Soil vapor levels and other residual contamination associated with releases of contaminants at the project site were analyzed in the Phase I and Phase II ESA Reports 194
City of Berkeley Comments and Responses
3000 Shattuck Avenue Mixed-Use Project
Responses to Comments on the Addendum
prepared for the project site by GEM Group, Inc on April 20, 2022 and October 10, 2022 (Appendix C), respectively. As explained in the Phase II ESA, according to the 2010 closure summary report, benzene was the only constituent that slightly exceeded its ESL. However, the closure summary report indicated that remediation through site upgrades, equipment removal and associated over- excavations, and natural attenuation have proven to be effective for removing on-site contamination. In addition, as explained in the Phase II ESA, concentrations of detected compounds in soil samples were all below their respective residential and commercial/industrial ESLs except for arsenic. However, because the range of arsenic concentrations found were within regional background concentrations, and the arsenic was determined to be naturally occurring. Therefore, impacts related to soil contaminants would be less than significant.
Response 3.21
The commenter states that the Addendum only analyzed cumulative impacts for transportation and air quality. The commenter states that cumulative impacts associated with construction and operation of the modified project constitute new impacts because recent development in the project area was not previously analyzed in the 2018 IS-ND, and states that the modified project and concurrent development projects would result in potentially cumulatively significant air quality, hazards, and land use impacts that were not analyzed in the Addendum.
Please refer to Response 2.2. A discussion of cumulative impacts has been included in Section 4.15, Changes in the Environmental Setting and Cumulative Impacts, of the Addendum. As discussed therein, the modified project would not result in cumulatively significant contributions to impacts related to air quality, hazards, or land use.
Response 3.23
The commenter states that the modified project may be constructed concurrently with numerous developments in the project vicinity that are also on the Cortese List and require remediation prior to construction. The commenter states that concurrent remediation and removal of contaminated soil on project sites may result in potentially significant cumulative hazards, air quality, and traffic impacts which were not analyzed or mitigated in the 2018 IS-ND or Addendum. The commenter states these potential cumulative impacts constitute new information and that a subsequent EIR should be prepared.
Please refer to Response 2.2, which includes an analysis of cumulative impacts. As discussed, the modified project would not result in cumulatively significant impacts related to air quality, hazards, or land use, and impacts would be less than significant. In addition, similar to the modified project, future development in the project vicinity would also be required to comply with the City’s standard condition of approval for hazardous materials, Toxics, when warranted by site conditions or location that identifies handling and disposal of pollutants, which requires preparation of a Soil and Groundwater Management Plan to address health and safety, proper handling, and disposal of USTs and/or contaminated soil if encountered during site redevelopment. Cumulative development on hazardous materials sites would be subject to their own regulatory processes related to clean up of each individual site and would not impact the modified project since impacts related to hazards are generally site-specific and would include specific protective measures as determined by the relevant regulatory agency, such as a soil management plan. Therefore, the project’s contribution to cumulative impacts related to hazardous contamination would not be cumulatively considerable. 195
City of Berkeley Comments and Responses
3000 Shattuck Avenue Mixed-Use Project
Responses to Comments on the Addendum
Response 3.23
The commenter states that project construction may occur concurrently with numerous developments within 1,000 feet and that the Addendum fails to analyze potentially significant cumulative air quality and health risks impacts associated with the concurrent construction of new projects. The commenter states that the change in size of the modified project would result in an increase in ROG emissions of 2,285 percent, which would exceed BAAQMD thresholds. The commenter states that a subsequent EIR should be prepared.
Please refer to Response 2.2, which includes a discussion of cumulative impacts, as well as Response
3.8, which explains that the modified project’s contribution to a cumulative air quality impact would be less than significant. The commenter states that the modified project would result in an increase in ROG emissions of 2,285 percent; this statement is incorrect. As discussed in Section 4.3, Air Quality, of the Addendum, construction and operational emissions were quantified using CalEEMod.
Construction activities would result in maximum average daily ROG emissions of 3.5 pounds per day, which would not exceed the BAAQMD construction ROG threshold of 54 pounds per day; operation would result in maximum average daily ROG emissions of 4.8 pounds per day, which would not exceed the BAAQMD operational ROG threshold of 54 pounds per day.
Response 3.24
The commenter states that the duration of project construction in the Addendum’s CalEEMod and Project Description are inconsistent, which potentially resulted in the underestimation of construction emissions. The commenter requests that the City prepare a subsequent EIR that accurately analyzes the modified project’s daily construction emissions with an accurate construction schedule. The commenter also states that the CalEEMod fails to include demolition of the existing building on site, and therefore does not take into account emissions associated with fugitive dust, debris removal, and exhaust from hauling trucks travelling to and from the project site. The commenter states that the Addendum also fails to analyze potentially significant air pollution impacts from trucking the modular units potentially hundreds of miles to the project site.
The commenter states that a subsequent EIR should be prepared.
Please refer to Response 1.6. Section 4.3, Air Quality, of the Addendum has been revised to include a discussion of CalEEMod methodology and revisions to the CalEEMod to include a demolition phase and an 18-month construction duration consistent with the Project Description. As discussed in Section 4.3, the modified project was modeled using conservative assumptions and both construction and operational air quality emissions were determined not to exceed BAAQMD thresholds. Therefore, impacts related to air quality would be less than significant.
Please refer to Response 1.8 regarding air quality impacts from trucking modular units to the project site.
Response 3.25
The commenter states that substantial evidence supports that the modified project would be detrimental to the general welfare due to unmitigated environmental and public health impacts This is an issue related to compliance with findings for approval contained in the Berkeley Municipal Code, not with CEQA.
As discussed throughout the Addendum, the modified project would result in less than significant impacts for all issue areas, similar to the original project. There are no changes in the project or 196
City of Berkeley Comments and Responses
3000 Shattuck Avenue Mixed-Use Project
Responses to Comments on the Addendum
circumstances or substantial new information that would cause the project to have new significant impacts or substantially increase previously identified significant impacts. The modified project would be required to comply with the same City Standard Conditions, General Plan policies, and Berkeley Municipal Code (BMC) regulations as outlined in the 2018 IS-ND. Impacts to the environmental and health and safety would be less than significant.
Please refer to Responses 1. 9, 2.2, and 3.5 re
garding general welfare as it relates to potential
environmental impacts.
Response 3.26
The commenter states that the project applicant has not made a commitment to ensure the modified project is built with a local skilled and trained workforce, or that the modified project will provide apprenticeship training opportunities, or healthcare benefits, or other workforce benefits or amenities for the City or for East Bay residents.
CEQA does not require an analysis of workforce requirements. This comment does not pertain to the adequacy of the information, analysis, or conclusions in the Addendum.
Response 3.27
The commenter cites the City’s Helping Achieve Responsible Development with Healthcare and Apprenticeship Training Standards (HARD HATS) Ordinance, and acknowledges that it does not apply to the modified project since the application was filed before the Ordinance went into effect.
The commenter states that evidence and findings show that projects that do not provide workforce benefits may be detrimental to the general welfare of the City and its residents.
This comment does not pertain to the adequacy of the information, analysis, or conclusions in the Addendum.
Response 3.28
The commenter cites BMC Section 22.20.020 and states that the modified project’s adverse impacts to the general welfare include failure to provide employment training, placement facilities, and amenities.
This comment does not pertain to the adequacy of the information, analysis, or conclusions in the Addendum.
Response 3.29
The commenter states that the ZAB lacked substantial evidence to make the necessary findings that demolition of the existing structure and construction of the modified project is in the public interest, absent community and workforce benefits to promote the general welfare. The commenter states that the modified project is detrimental to general welfare, and requests City Council to ask the applicant to voluntarily agree to include community benefits including local hire provisions and healthcare standards and benefits.
This comment does not pertain to the adequacy of the information, analysis, or conclusions in the Addendum.
197
City of Berkeley Comments and Responses
3000 Shattuck Avenue Mixed-Use Project
Responses to Comments on the Addendum
Response 3.30
The commenter states that the modified project may be detrimental to the general welfare of residents absent a commitment from the applicant to hire locally. The commenter requests the applicant to commit to providing a local hire percentage of 30 percent as a community benefit.
This comment does not pertain to the adequacy of the information, analysis, or conclusions in the Addendum.
Response 3.31
The commenter states that the modified project may be detrimental to the general welfare of residents since the applicant has not committed to providing healthcare expenditures for construction workers building the project. The commenter requests that the applicant commit to complying with provisions of HARD HATS Ordinance which address healthcare expenditures for the construction workforce.
This comment does not pertain to the adequacy of the information, analysis, or conclusions in the Addendum.
Response 3.32
The commenter states that the modified project fails to demonstrate consistency with General Plan economic and employment policies.
CEQA does not require an analysis of impacts on the economy or employment. This comment does not pertain to the adequacy of the information, analysis, or conclusions in the Addendum.
Response 3.33
The commenter states that the modified project fails to demonstrate consistency with General Plan economic and employment policies, and that the modified project should not be approved until consistency is demonstrated. The commenter also states that the applicant’s decision to pay an in- lieu fee to the City in place of meeting the on-site affordable unit recommendations fails to demonstrate consistency with the Housing Element’s goal to provide an adequate supply of affordable housing. The commenter requests that the applicant add additional on-site affordable units as a means of increasing compliance with the General Plan.
Please refer to Response 3.13 regarding in-lieu fees.
CEQA does not require an analysis of impacts on the economy or employment. This comment does not pertain to the adequacy of the information, analysis, or conclusions in the Addendum.
Response 3.34
The commenter states that more affordable units should be provided to be consistent with the City’s Housing Element and State law. The commenter also cites BMC Section 23.328.010 which requires residential projects with five or more dwelling units to include at least 20 percent affordable units or pay in-lieu fees. The commenter states that the applicant’s decision to pay in-lieu fees places a burden on the City to identify alternate sites to construct affordable housing units to meet RHNA requirements. This comment does not pertain to the adequacy of the information, analysis, or conclusions in the Addendum as it pertains to compliance with CEQA. 198
City of Berkeley Comments and Responses
3000 Shattuck Avenue Mixed-Use Project
Responses to Comments on the Addendum
The commenter is correct in stating that BMC Section 23.328.010 requires residential projects with five or more dwelling units to include at least 20 percent affordable units or pay in-lieu fees. The applicant has elected to provide 17 very low-income units housing units in conjunction with payment of in-lieu fees.
Response 3.35
The commenter concludes by requesting for the City Council to uphold the appeal, vacate the ZAB’s approval of the modified project, and prepare a subsequent EIR.
This comment does not pertain to the adequacy of the information, analysis, or conclusions in the Addendum.
199
City of Berkeley Revisions to the Addendum
3000 Shattuck Avenue Mixed-Use Project
Responses to Comments on the Addendum
3 Revisions to the Addendum
Chapter 3 presents specific revisions to the text of the Addendum that are being made in response to comments received or to make corrections. In no case do these revisions result in a new impact or impacts of a substantially greater severity than those identified in the Addendum. Where revisions to the main text are called for, the page and paragraph of the Addendum are shown, followed by the appropriate revision. Added text is indicated with underlining and deleted text is indicated with strikeout. Page numbers correspond to the page numbers of the Addendum. The City has prepared a Revised Addendum that includes the following revisions to the text.
The following revision has been made to Pages 14 to 16 of Section 4.3, Air Qua lity, of the Addendum:
Methodology
The project’s construction and operational emissions were estimated using the California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod), version 2022.1, and attached to this report as Appendix A. CalEEMod uses project-specific information, including the project’s land uses, square footages for different uses, and location, to estimate a project’s construction and operational emissions.
Construction emissions modeled include emissions generated by construction equipment used on the site and emissions generated by vehicle trips associated with construction, such as worker and vendor trips. The construction schedule and hauling capacity of trucks (12 cubic yards) were based on applicant-provided data, and default CalEEMod construction equipment was used. It was assumed that project construction would comply with all applicable regulatory standards, including BAAQMD Regulation 8, Rule 3 requirements related to architectural coatings. Project construction is expected to last approximately 18 months.
Operational emissions modeled include mobile source emissions (i.e., vehicle emissions) and area source emissions. Mobile source emissions consist of emissions generated by vehicle trips to and from the project site. CalEEMod default trip generation rates were used. Default trip rates from CalEEMod are likely a conservative estimate for project trips, because the location of the project site allows for easy access to mass transit options such as the Ashby BART station and therefore the modified project would result in less vehicle trips compared to if the modified project were located far from transit. Area source emissions are generated by landscape maintenance equipment, consumer products, and architectural coatings. To be conservative, CalEEMod did not take into account a solar energy system, which is required pursuant to BMC Chapter 12.80.
Impacts of the Modified Project
The results of the modified project’s CalEEMod modeling are provided in Table 1 and in Appendix A. To be conservative, the air quality modeling did not include a solar energy system and building electrification, both of which are required pursuant to BMC Chapter 12.80 and would be included in the project. As shown in the table and in Appendix A, the conservatively modeled modified project’s air quality emissions would not exceed BAAQMD construction thresholds, like the original project. Therefore, impacts would remain less than significant. 200
City of Berkeley Revisions to the Addendum
3000 Shattuck Avenue Mixed-Use Project
Responses to Comments on the Addendum
In terms of cumulative air quality impacts, BAAQMD states in their CEQA Air Quality Guidelines that the project-level thresholds of significance for criteria air pollutants, “are the levels at which the Air District has determined that an individual project’s contribution to the cumulative impact (non-attainment) is cumulatively considerable.” Therefore, since the modified project’s estimated air pollutant emissions are below BAAQMD’s thresholds of significance, the modified project’s contribution to a cumulative air quality impact would be less than significant. Impacts would remain less than significant. Impacts would remain less than significant.
Table 1 Modified Project Air Quality Emissions
ROG NOx PM10 PM2.5
Construction Emissions (maximum average daily lb/day) 3.5 4.4 0.2 0.2 BAAQMD Threshold (lb/day) 54 54 82 54
Exceed Threshold? No No No No
Project Operational Emissions (tpy) 1 0.5 <0. 1 <0.1
Operational Emissions (maximum average daily lb/day) 4.8 2.5 0.1 0.1 BAAQMD Threshold (tpy) 10 10 15 10
BAAQMD Threshold (lb/day) 54 54 82 54
Exceed Threshold? No No No No
ROG = reactive organic gases; NOx = nitrous oxides; CO = carbon monoxide; PM10 = particulate matter less than 10 microns in diameter; PM2.5 = particulate matter less than 2.5 microns in diameter; lb/day = pounds per day; tpy = tons per year Source: Appendix A
From a construction standpoint, exhaust emissions from construction equipment would be similar to or reduced as compared to the original project due to the use of newer and more efficient equipment. Construction equipment would be equipped with Tier 2 or higher engines and the most effective Verified Diesel Emission Control Strategies available (likely Tier 4) pursuant to standard condition of approval, Air Quality – Diesel Particulate Matter Controls During Construction. The proposed building under the modified project would have ten floors, as compared to five floors under the original project. Despite the increased building height, the construction period for the modified project would be roughly the same as the original project (18 months). Although Mmodular construction may be employed for the modified project, but site preparation and air quality would still be substantially the same as for traditional construction. Construction modeling for the building construction phase includes 17.9 one-way vendor trips per day, which over a 321-day phase length equates to 5,745 vendor trips and over 48,000 vendor trucking miles during this phase. Long-range trucking was not analyzed in this analysis, as it was assumed those emissions were considered out of the range of considerable direct or indirect effects. CEQA only requires analysis of impacts that are directly or indirectly attributable to the project under consideration. (State CEQA Guidelines, § 15064(d).) There is no indication that any long-range trucking beyond that analyzed here would be directly related to or caused by the project. The included emissions were those reasonably estimated to be related directly or indirectly to the project under consideration. Any potential long-range trucking may be necessary for numerous different projects as a result of general market demand, regardless of whether this project would proceed or not. Thus, such emissions may not be “caused by” the project under consideration. Similarly, a lead agency may not be able to require mitigation for emissions that result out of the scope of the project under consideration; mitigation can only be required for emissions that are actually caused by the project (State CEQA Guidelines, § 15126.4(a)(4).). This approach was discussed in detail in with the removal of the term “lifecycle” 201
City of Berkeley Revisions to the Addendum
3000 Shattuck Avenue Mixed-Use Project
Responses to Comments on the Addendum
from Appendix F of the CEQA Guidelines in the California Natural Resources Agency’s December 2009 Final Statement of Reasons for Regulatory Action: Amendments to the State CEQA Guidelines Addressing Analysis and Mitigation of Greenhouse Gas Emissions Pursuant to SB97. It is similarly consistent with the “lifecycle” discussion in the California Department of Transportation’s February 2019 CEQA Guidelines Update. Therefore, impacts related to trucking of modular units to the project site would be less than significant. In addition, fugitive dust generated during construction would be similar to the amount estimated under the original project, considering that the project site and area of grading would be the same size.
The following revision has been made to Pages 16 to 17 of Section 4.3, Air Quality, of the Addendum:
The California Air Resources Board (CARB) has authority over the issue of exposure to formaldehyde, and has stated that the approved control measures for reducing emissions, including formaldehyde, from composite wood products provide a level of control that protects health and safety. CARB states directly in its Frequently Asked Questions for Consumers on Reducing Emissions from Composite Wood Products (CWP) that, “from a public health standpoint, the CWP Regulation’s emission standards are set at low levels intended to protect public health. The first emission standards (Phase 1) went into effect in 2009. The more stringent Phase 2 standards are now in effect for all composite wood panels and finished goods sold in California. Prior to the CWP Regulation, formaldehyde emissions were often ten to twenty-fold higher than the current allowable levels.” (CARB 2024) The regulation also includes provisions to encourage the use of no-added formaldehyde and ultra-low emitting formaldehyde-based resins in composite wood products. In addition, BAAQMD Regulation 8 Rule 32 (Formaldehyde Emissions Estimates and Reporting Requirements for Wood Products Coatings) requires the manufacturing industry to implement necessary reductions in formaldehyde emissions from wood coatings to protect public health. The modified project would be required to comply with all applicable City, State, and federal requirements pertaining to the use of indoor building materials. As the modified project will be built to the 2022 version of the Title 24 standards, which requires the implementation of MERV 13 or higher HVAC systems, evidence demonstrates that compliance with applicable regulations will be effective in reducing indoor formaldehyde concentrations to levels that are acceptable to CARB for the protection of public health (CARB 2024). Therefore, the modified project would have less than significant impacts on formaldehyde.
The following revision has been made to Pages 23 to 24 of Section 4.7, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, of the Addendum:
As discussed in the Phase I ESA, there were no recognized environmental conditions (RECs)2 or vapor encroachment condition (VEC)3 at the project site. Like the original project, no hazardous materials were identified above environmental screening levels in the Phase II ESA. As shown in Table 1 of the Phase II ESA, concentrations of detected compounds in soil samples were all below their respective residential and commercial/industrial San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board (SFBRWQCB) groundwater vapor intrusion environmental screening levels
2 According to the Phase I ESA, a REC refers to the presence or likely presence of any hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or at a property due to any release to the environment; under conditions indicative of a release to the environment; or under conditions that pose as a material threat of future release to the environment. 3 According to the Phase I ESA, VEC is the presence or likely presence of volatile and toxic vapors in the vadose zone of the project site caused by the release of vapors from contaminated soil and/or groundwater either on or near the project site. 202
City of Berkeley Revisions to the Addendum
3000 Shattuck Avenue Mixed-Use Project
Responses to Comments on the Addendum
(ESLs), except for arsenic. However, the range of arsenic concentrations found were within regional background concentrations and therefore was determined to be naturally occurring.
The following revision has been made to Page 26 of Section 4.9, Noise, of the Addendum:
On-site stationary noise sources would be similar as under the original project, such as rooftop mechanical equipment (shielded by a rooftop parapet wall) and landscaping activities. The taller height of the modified project would increase the distance between the operational equipment (i.e., roof-mounted HVAC) to the nearest sensitive receptors and would result in greater noise attenuation. Overall, the modified project would generate similar on- and off-site noise as the original project.
Construction techniques under the modified project would be similar to those under the original project. Modular construction may be employed for the modified project, but site preparation and noise would be substantially the same as for traditional construction. The increased height of the modified project would not result in use of larger equipment, as the fleet of construction equipment would be substantially similar to the original project, though the construction period may be slightly extended.
The following revision has been made to Page 31 of Section 4.13, Transportation, of the Addendum:
Like the original project, the modified project would not incorporate hazardous design features or modify emergency access routes. No significant new or substantially increased transportation impacts would occur compared to the original project. In addition, the modified project would be required to comply with the City’s standard condition of approval, Transportation Construction Plan, which would require preparation of a Transportation Construction Plan for all phases of construction in order to minimize impacts related to construction traffic. No significant new or substantially increased transportation impacts would occur compared to the original project.
Section 4.15, Changes in the Environmental Setting and Cumulative Impacts, has been added to Pages 33 to 37 of the Addendum:
4.15 Changes in the Environmental Setting and
Cumulative Impacts
Impacts of the Proposed Project
Cumulatively Considerable Impacts
Cumulative impacts could occur if the construction of other projects occurs at the same time as the modified project and in the same geographic area, such that the effects of similar impacts of multiple projects combine to create greater levels of impact than would occur at the project- level. For example, if the construction of other projects in the area occurs at the same time as project activities, combined air quality and noise impacts may be greater than at the project level. Since approval of the 2018 Final IS-ND, the cumulative setting has changed due to projects that have been completed as well as new projects that have been proposed. This analysis uses the list of projects approach authorized by CEQA Guidelines section 15130(b)(1)(A). Table 2 includes a list of nearby development projects within 2 miles producing related or cumulative effects.
203
City of Berkeley Revisions to the Addendum
3000 Shattuck Avenue Mixed-Use Project
Responses to Comments on the Addendum
Table 2 Cumulative Development Projects
No. Project Location Project Components Status
Distance to
Project Site
1 2001 Ashby Avenue Affordable rental building with 87
apartments.
Under construction 0.1 miles
2 2920 Shattuck Avenue 10-story mixed-use project with 221 apartments.
Under Review 0.1 miles
3 3100 Adeline Street Redeveloping the Ashby BART station to include housing, open space, and
community amenities.
Planning 0.6 miles
4 2733 San Pablo Avenue Demolition of existing non-landmarked structures. Construction of a new 8-
story mixed-use residential
development with 152 dwelling units,
and commercial space.
Under Review 1.5 miles
5 2601 San Pablo Avenue Eight-story mixed-use building with 223 dwelling units over a 1,940 square-foot
commercial space.
Under Review 1.7 miles
6 1461 University Avenue 42-unit supportive housing project. Design 2.0 miles 7 700/742 Grayson Street 2.5-acre industrial site with a research and development and manufacturing
building.
Recently entitled 1.9 miles
8 2527 San Pablo Avenue 6-story, mixed use building with 63 dwelling units, commercial space, and
ground level parking.
Under construction 1.7 miles
Source: City of Berkeley 2024
As determined in the analysis in Section 4.16, Other Impacts, the project would not result in significant impacts with regard to the following topics, and, do not need to be discussed in terms of cumulative impacts, because they cannot combine with other cumulative projects to result in cumulative impacts: agriculture/forestry resources, biological resources, geology and soils, hydrology and water quality, tribal cultural resources, and wildfire. Other issues (e.g., cultural resources, hazards and hazardous materials, and land use) are site-specific by nature, and impacts at one location do not contribute to impacts at other locations. Thus, the potential for the modified project to contribute to cumulative impacts would be limited to the following issue areas:
Aesthetics. Cumulative projects could result in changes to scenic vistas, visual character, and light and glare. As described in Section 4.2, Aesthetics, Senate Bill 743 (California Public Resources Code Section 21099) passed in 2013, made changes to the CEQA for projects located in transit-oriented development areas. Among these changes are that a project’s aesthetic impacts are no longer considered significant impacts on the environment if the project is a residential, mixed-use residential, or employment center project and if the project is located on an infill site within a TPA. Therefore, aesthetic impacts related to the modified project are not considered significant contributions to a cumulative impact because it is an infill project. Cumulative projects would also be subject to the City’s design standards and BMC regulations regarding light and glare (e.g. BMC Section 23.304 which requires buildings in and adjacent to residential zones to shield and direct downward exterior lighting). Therefore, the modified project’s contribution to cumulative aesthetic impacts would not be considerable.
204
City of Berkeley Revisions to the Addendum
3000 Shattuck Avenue Mixed-Use Project
Responses to Comments on the Addendum
Air Quality. Because the BAAQMD is in non-attainment for the state and federal ozone standards, the state and federal PM2.5 (particulate matter up to 2.5 microns in size) standards and the state PM10 (particulate matter up to 10 microns in size) standards, cumulative air quality impacts currently exist for these pollutants, and BAAQMD is required to prepare a plan for improvement. As discussed in Section 4.3, Air Quality, the modified project construction and operation would not generate emissions of these air pollutants in excess of BAAQMD regional or localized significance thresholds, which are intended to assess whether a project’s contribution to existing cumulative air quality impacts is considerable. Therefore, the modified project’s contribution to existing cumulative air quality impacts would not be considerable.
Biological Resources. As discussed in Section 4.16, Other Impacts, of the Addendum, the project site does not contain riparian areas, wetlands, or other habitat suitable for special- status species. Most cumulative impacts related to biological resources occur when a disproportionate number of cumulative projects occur at once and regionally impact a local population of a special-status species, riparian habitat, sensitive natural communities, wetlands, or other locally protected biological resources. In this case, the cumulative projects would occur in previously developed areas. Several of the development projects near the project site would be required to undergo CEQA review, which would identify the extent of biological resource impacts and require appropriate mitigation of those impacts.
Projects exempt from CEQA would be subject to existing BMC requirements and standard conditions of approval to reduce potential impacts to biological resources to a less-than- significant level such that project-level impacts would not result in a cumulatively considerable contribution to this cumulative impact.
Energy. Cumulative projects would be required to comply with applicable state and local regulations and standards that require efficient energy use. Development projects in the City would also be reviewed for consistency with the General Plan and CAP. Cumulative development of projects listed in Table 2 would not exceed growth planned by the City.
Therefore, cumulative energy impacts would be less than significant, and the modified project would not result in a considerable contribution to this impact. Greenhouse Gas Emissions. GHG impacts are assessed in a cumulative context since generally no single project can cause a discernible change to the climate. Therefore, cumulative significance is based on the same thresholds as the modified project. In the absence of an adopted numeric threshold by the BAAQMD or the City of Berkeley, the significance of the modified project’s GHG emissions is evaluated based on consistency with applicable plans, policies, regulations, and requirements adopted to implement a statewide, regional, or local plan for the reduction or mitigation of GHG emissions. As discussed in Section 4.6, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, the modified project would be consistent with Berkeley’s CAP and other climate goals the city has in place and would therefore not result in a cumulatively considerable contribution to this cumulative impact. Noise. Overlapping construction activities associated with cumulative development projects in conjunction with modified project activities could result in cumulative noise impacts related to a temporary increase in ambient noise levels at the same noise-sensitive receivers located throughout the area, especially during construction activities. However, the modified project would be subject to the City’s standard condition of approval for Use Permits in non-residential zones, and cumulative development projects would be subject to compliance with the noise level limits established in the BMC Section 13.40.070 or the City’s standard conditions of approval. Given the discussion in Section 4.9 Noise, the modified 205
City of Berkeley Revisions to the Addendum
3000 Shattuck Avenue Mixed-Use Project
Responses to Comments on the Addendum
project would not result in a cumulatively considerable contribution to a significant cumulative impact..
Population and Housing. As described in Section 4.10, Population and Housing, the modified project would result in 360 new residents. Although this is an additional 265 residents compared to the original project, the growth would not exceed growth anticipated by regional growth projections and the City’s General Plan and Housing Element.
Cumulative projects near the project site could result in up to approximately 788 new dwelling units, development from these cumulative projects would not exceed the 8,934 units planned by the City4.
Public Services and Recreation. As described in Section 4.11, Public Services, and Section
4.12, Recreation, the modified project would not require new public facilities or services because the project site is already served by existing services and would not exceed planned growth. Several of the cumulative development projects would be required to undergo their own CEQA review, which would identify the extent of police, fire, schools, and recreation impacts and provide suitable mitigation, if warranted. Projects exempt from CEQA would be subject to existing BMC requirements and standard conditions of approval to reduce potential impacts. Similar to the modified project, cumulative projects would be subject to applicable school fees.
Transportation. Overlapping construction schedules associated with other cumulative projects in conjunction with project activities could result in cumulative transportation impacts, such as impacts related to VMT and emergency access during construction.
Cumulative projects would be required to be evaluated with the City’s VMT thresholds to be screened out from a VMT analysis or be required to complete a VMT analysis to determine the project’s potential impacts. Projects would also be subject to State requirements to achieve a reduction in project-generated VMT. As discussed in Section 4.13, Transportation, the modified project would decrease net ADT by 75 ADT when compared to the existing use; would not incorporate hazardous design features; and would not modify emergency access routes. The modified project is located near public transportation, and based on its size, the modified project is not anticipated to generate a significant number of transit trips such that service or overall capacity of public transportation would be adversely affected.
Impacts would be less than significant. Therefore, cumulative construction-related and operational transportation impacts would be less than significant, and the modified project would not result in a considerable contribution to this impact. Utilities and Service Systems. The analysis included in Section 4.14, Utilities and Service Systems, is cumulative in nature due to the fact that it analyzes the utility infrastructure available throughout the city and the remaining capacity of the utility systems accounting for all current development in the city and projected growth within the city. As discussed in Section 4.14, Utilities and Service Systems, the modified project would not result in demand for water, wastewater, electricity, or stormwater infrastructure that would exceed the remaining capacity of these systems in the City. The modified project also would not result in solid waste in excess of the remaining capacity of the Altamont Landfill or the Vasco Road Sanitary Landfill. Cumulative projects would also be required to comply with the City’s standard condition of approval and prepare a Waste Diversion Report. The modified project would not exceed development planned by the City, which has already undergone
4 The City of Berkeley was assigned a RHNA of 8,934 units for the 2023 to 2031 planning period. 206
City of Berkeley Revisions to the Addendum
3000 Shattuck Avenue Mixed-Use Project
Responses to Comments on the Addendum
environmental review for the City’s General Plan and 2023-2031 Housing Element, and would not result in a considerable contribution to this impact.
Given the above discussion, the modified project would not result in a cumulatively considerable contribution to a significant cumulative impact with mitigation incorporated.
Effects and Mitigation Measures
No new or substantially more severe significant effects would occur to cumulatively considerable impacts, and no new mitigation measures are necessary.
Conclusion
Impacts would be less than significant, like the original project and no significant new or substantially increased cumulative impacts would occur compared to the original project.
207
City of Berkeley Revisions to the Addendum
3000 Shattuck Avenue Mixed-Use Project
Responses to Comments on the Addendum
This page intentionally left blank.
208
Attachment A
Updated California Emissions Estimator Model Results
3000 Shattuck Detailed Report, 2/19/2025
1 / 41
3000 Shattuck Detailed Report
Table of Contents
1. Basic Project Information
1.1. Basic Project Information
1.2. Land Use Types
1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector
2. Emissions Summary
2.1. Construction Emissions Compared Against Thresholds
2.2. Construction Emissions by Y ear, Unmitigated
2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds
2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated
3. Construction Emissions Details
3.1. Demolition (2023) - Unmitigated
3.3. Site Preparation (2023) - Unmitigated
3.5. Grading (2023) - Unmitigated
3.7. Building Construction (2023) - Unmitigated
3.9. Building Construction (2024) - Unmitigated
3000 Shattuck Detailed Report, 2/19/2025
2 / 41
3.11. Paving (2024) - Unmitigated
3.13. Architectural Coating (2024) - Unmitigated
3.15. Architectural Coating (2025) - Unmitigated
4. Operations Emissions Details
4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use
4.1.1. Unmitigated
4.2. Energy
4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated
4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated
4.3. Area Emissions by Source
4.3.1. Unmitigated
4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use
4.4.1. Unmitigated
4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use
4.5.1. Unmitigated
4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use
4.6.1. Unmitigated
4.7. Offroad Emissions By Equipment Type
3000 Shattuck Detailed Report, 2/19/2025
3 / 41
4.7.1. Unmitigated
4.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment Type
4.8.1. Unmitigated
4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type
4.9.1. Unmitigated
4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type
4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated
4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated
4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated
5. Activity Data
5.1. Construction Schedule
5.2. Off-Road Equipment
5.2.1. Unmitigated
5.3. Construction Vehicles
5.3.1. Unmitigated
5.4. Vehicles
5.4.1. Construction Vehicle Control Strategies
5.5. Architectural Coatings
3000 Shattuck Detailed Report, 2/19/2025
4 / 41
5.6. Dust Mitigation
5.6.1. Construction Earthmoving Activities
5.6.2. Construction Earthmoving Control Strategies
5.7. Construction Paving
5.8. Construction Electricity Consumption and Emissions Factors
5.9. Operational Mobile Sources
5.9.1. Unmitigated
5.10. Operational Area Sources
5.10.1. Hearths
5.10.1.1. Unmitigated
5.10.2. Architectural Coatings
5.10.3. Landscape Equipment
5.11. Operational Energy Consumption
5.11.1. Unmitigated
5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption
5.12.1. Unmitigated
5.13. Operational Waste Generation
5.13.1. Unmitigated
3000 Shattuck Detailed Report, 2/19/2025
5 / 41
5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment
5.14.1. Unmitigated
5.15. Operational Off-Road Equipment
5.15.1. Unmitigated
5.16. Stationary Sources
5.16.1. Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps
5.16.2. Process Boilers
5.17. User Defined
5.18. Vegetation
5.18.1. Land Use Change
5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type
5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
5.18.2. Sequestration
5.18.2.1. Unmitigated
6. Climate Risk Detailed Report
6.1. Climate Risk Summary
6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores
3000 Shattuck Detailed Report, 2/19/2025
6 / 41
6.3. Adjusted Climate Risk Scores
6.4. Climate Risk Reduction Measures
7. Health and Equity Details
7.1. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Scores
7.2. Healthy Places Index Scores
7.3. Overall Health & Equity Scores
7.4. Health & Equity Measures
7.5. Evaluation Scorecard
7.6. Health & Equity Custom Measures
8. User Changes to Default Data
3000 Shattuck Detailed Report, 2/19/2025
7 / 41
1. Basic Project Information
1.1. Basic Project Information
Data Field Value
Project Name 3000 Shattuck
Construction Start Date 7/3/2023
Operational Y ear 2025
Lead Agency —
Land Use Scale Project/site
Analysis Level for Defaults County
Windspeed (m/s) 3.90
Precipitation (days) 17.0
Location 3000 Shattuck Ave., Berkeley, CA 94705, USA
County Alameda
City Berkeley
Air District Bay Area AQMD
Air Basin San Francisco Bay Area
TAZ 1522
EDFZ 1
Electric Utility Pacific Gas & Electric Company
Gas Utility Pacific Gas & Electric
App Version 2022.1.1.29
1.2. Land Use Types
Land Use Subtype Size Unit Lot Acreage Building Area (sq ft) Landscape Area (sq ft)
Special Landscape
Area (sq ft)
Population Description
Apartments Mid
Rise
166 Dwelling Unit 0.29 80,235 4,043 — 468 —
3000 Shattuck Detailed Report, 2/19/2025
8 / 41
Strip Mall 1.09 1000sqft 0.03 1,095 0.00 — — —
1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector No measures selected
2. Emissions Summary
2.1. Construction Emissions Compared Against Thresholds Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Un/Mit. ROG NOx CO PM10E PM2.5E
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — —
Unmit. 1.31 12.6 12.6 0.60 0.55
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — —
Unmit. 71.6 7.04 12.0 0.29 0.27
Average Daily (Max) — — — — —
Unmit. 3.45 4.42 7.62 0.18 0.16
Annual (Max) — — — — —
Unmit. 0.63 0.81 1.39 0.03 0.03
Exceeds (Daily Max) — — — — —
Threshold 54.0 54.0 0.00 82.0 54.0
Unmit. Y es No Y es No No
Exceeds (Average Daily) — — — — —
Threshold 54.0 54.0 0.00 82.0 54.0
Unmit. No No Y es No No
2.2. Construction Emissions by Y ear, Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Y ear ROG NOx CO PM10E PM2.5E
3000 Shattuck Detailed Report, 2/19/2025
9 / 41
Daily - Summer (Max) — — — — —
2023 1.31 12.6 12.6 0.60 0.55
2024 1.00 6.50 12.2 0.26 0.24
Daily - Winter (Max) — — — — —
2023 1.03 7.04 12.0 0.29 0.27
2024 71.6 6.62 11.6 0.26 0.24
2025 71.5 0.96 1.96 0.03 0.03
Average Daily — — — — —
2023 0.33 2.41 3.69 0.10 0.09
2024 3.45 4.42 7.62 0.18 0.16
2025 0.28 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005
Annual — — — — —
2023 0.06 0.44 0.67 0.02 0.02
2024 0.63 0.81 1.39 0.03 0.03
2025 0.05 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005
2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Un/Mit. ROG NOx CO PM10E PM2.5E
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — —
Unmit. 5.15 2.37 19.1 0.06 0.06
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — —
Unmit. 5.01 2.71 19.4 0.06 0.06
Average Daily (Max) — — — — —
Unmit. 4.82 2.46 17.4 0.06 0.06
Annual (Max) — — — — —
Unmit. 0.88 0.45 3.17 0.01 0.01
Exceeds (Annual) — — — — —
3000 Shattuck Detailed Report, 2/19/2025
10 / 41
Threshold 10.0 10.0 — 15.0 10.0
Unmit. No No — No No
2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Sector ROG NOx CO PM10E PM2.5E
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — —
Mobile 3.08 2.00 19.0 0.03 0.03
Area 2.05 — — — —
Energy 0.02 0.37 0.16 0.03 0.03
Water — — — — —
Waste — — — — —
Refrig. — — — — —
Total 5.15 2.37 19.1 0.06 0.06
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — —
Mobile 2.93 2.34 19.3 0.03 0.03
Area 2.05 — — — —
Energy 0.02 0.37 0.16 0.03 0.03
Water — — — — —
Waste — — — — —
Refrig. — — — — —
Total 5.01 2.71 19.4 0.06 0.06
Average Daily — — — — —
Mobile 2.74 2.09 17.2 0.03 0.03
Area 2.05 — — — —
Energy 0.02 0.37 0.16 0.03 0.03
Water — — — — —
Waste — — — — —
3000 Shattuck Detailed Report, 2/19/2025
11 / 41
Refrig. — — — — —
Total 4.82 2.46 17.4 0.06 0.06
Annual — — — — —
Mobile 0.50 0.38 3.14 0.01 < 0.005
Area 0.37 — — — —
Energy < 0.005 0.07 0.03 0.01 0.01
Water — — — — —
Waste — — — — —
Refrig. — — — — —
Total 0.88 0.45 3.17 0.01 0.01
3. Construction Emissions Details
3.1. Demolition (2023) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx CO PM10E PM2.5E
Onsite — — — — —
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — —
Off-Road Equipment 0.54 4.99 5.91 0.21 0.20
Demolition — — — — —
Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — —
Average Daily — — — — —
Off-Road Equipment 0.05 0.44 0.52 0.02 0.02
Demolition — — — — —
Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Annual — — — — —
Off-Road Equipment 0.01 0.08 0.09 < 0.005 < 0.005
3000 Shattuck Detailed Report, 2/19/2025
12 / 41
Demolition — — — — —
Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Offsite — — — — —
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — —
Worker 0.04 0.03 0.45 0.00 0.00
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hauling < 0.005 0.13 0.05 < 0.005 < 0.005
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — —
Average Daily — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.00 0.00
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hauling < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005
Annual — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005
3.3. Site Preparation (2023) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx CO PM10E PM2.5E
Onsite — — — — —
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — —
Off-Road Equipment 0.54 5.02 5.57 0.27 0.25
Dust From Material Movement — — — — —
Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — —
Average Daily — — — — —
Off-Road Equipment < 0.005 0.04 0.05 < 0.005 < 0.005
3000 Shattuck Detailed Report, 2/19/2025
13 / 41
Dust From Material Movement — — — — —
Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Annual — — — — —
Off-Road Equipment < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005
Dust From Material Movement — — — — —
Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Offsite — — — — —
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — —
Worker 0.02 0.01 0.22 0.00 0.00
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — —
Average Daily — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Annual — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3.5. Grading (2023) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx CO PM10E PM2.5E
Onsite — — — — —
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — —
Off-Road Equipment 1.28 12.6 11.4 0.60 0.55
Dust From Material Movement — — — — —
3000 Shattuck Detailed Report, 2/19/2025
14 / 41
Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — —
Average Daily — — — — —
Off-Road Equipment 0.02 0.21 0.19 0.01 0.01
Dust From Material Movement — — — — —
Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Annual — — — — —
Off-Road Equipment < 0.005 0.04 0.03 < 0.005 < 0.005
Dust From Material Movement — — — — —
Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Offsite — — — — —
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — —
Worker 0.03 0.02 0.33 0.00 0.00
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — —
Average Daily — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Annual — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3.7. Building Construction (2023) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx CO PM10E PM2.5E
3000 Shattuck Detailed Report, 2/19/2025
15 / 41
Onsite — — — — —
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — —
Off-Road Equipment 0.58 5.93 7.00 0.28 0.26
Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — —
Off-Road Equipment 0.58 5.93 7.00 0.28 0.26
Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Average Daily — — — — —
Off-Road Equipment 0.14 1.45 1.71 0.07 0.06
Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Annual — — — — —
Off-Road Equipment 0.03 0.26 0.31 0.01 0.01
Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Offsite — — — — —
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — —
Worker 0.45 0.33 5.34 0.00 0.00
Vendor 0.02 0.63 0.28 0.01 0.01
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — —
Worker 0.43 0.45 4.73 0.00 0.00
Vendor 0.02 0.67 0.29 0.01 0.01
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Average Daily — — — — —
Worker 0.10 0.10 1.12 0.00 0.00
Vendor < 0.005 0.16 0.07 < 0.005 < 0.005
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Annual — — — — —
Worker 0.02 0.02 0.20 0.00 0.00
3000 Shattuck Detailed Report, 2/19/2025
16 / 41
Vendor < 0.005 0.03 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3.9. Building Construction (2024) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx CO PM10E PM2.5E
Onsite — — — — —
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — —
Off-Road Equipment 0.56 5.60 6.98 0.26 0.23
Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — —
Off-Road Equipment 0.56 5.60 6.98 0.26 0.23
Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Average Daily — — — — —
Off-Road Equipment 0.35 3.55 4.42 0.16 0.15
Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Annual — — — — —
Off-Road Equipment 0.06 0.65 0.81 0.03 0.03
Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Offsite — — — — —
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — —
Worker 0.43 0.30 4.97 0.00 0.00
Vendor 0.01 0.61 0.27 0.01 0.01
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — —
Worker 0.41 0.38 4.38 0.00 0.00
Vendor 0.01 0.64 0.28 0.01 0.01
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3000 Shattuck Detailed Report, 2/19/2025
17 / 41
Average Daily — — — — —
Worker 0.26 0.24 2.69 0.00 0.00
Vendor 0.01 0.40 0.17 < 0.005 < 0.005
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Annual — — — — —
Worker 0.05 0.04 0.49 0.00 0.00
Vendor < 0.005 0.07 0.03 < 0.005 < 0.005
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3.11. Paving (2024) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx CO PM10E PM2.5E
Onsite — — — — —
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — —
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — —
Off-Road Equipment 0.53 4.52 5.32 0.21 0.19
Paving 0.00 — — — —
Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Average Daily — — — — —
Off-Road Equipment 0.02 0.20 0.23 0.01 0.01
Paving 0.00 — — — —
Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Annual — — — — —
Off-Road Equipment < 0.005 0.04 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005
Paving 0.00 — — — —
Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Offsite — — — — —
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — —
3000 Shattuck Detailed Report, 2/19/2025
18 / 41
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — —
Worker 0.06 0.06 0.64 0.00 0.00
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Average Daily — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.00 0.00
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Annual — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3.13. Architectural Coating (2024) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx CO PM10E PM2.5E
Onsite — — — — —
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — —
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — —
Off-Road Equipment 0.14 0.91 1.15 0.03 0.03
Architectural Coatings 71.3 — — — —
Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Average Daily — — — — —
Off-Road Equipment 0.01 0.04 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005
Architectural Coatings 2.79 — — — —
Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Annual — — — — —
Off-Road Equipment < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005
3000 Shattuck Detailed Report, 2/19/2025
19 / 41
Architectural Coatings 0.51 — — — —
Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Offsite — — — — —
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — —
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — —
Worker 0.08 0.08 0.88 0.00 0.00
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Average Daily — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.00 0.00
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Annual — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3.15. Architectural Coating (2025) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx CO PM10E PM2.5E
Onsite — — — — —
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — —
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — —
Off-Road Equipment 0.13 0.88 1.14 0.03 0.03
Architectural Coatings 71.3 — — — —
Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Average Daily — — — — —
Off-Road Equipment < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005
3000 Shattuck Detailed Report, 2/19/2025
20 / 41
Architectural Coatings 0.28 — — — —
Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Annual — — — — —
Off-Road Equipment < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 Architectural Coatings 0.05 — — — —
Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Offsite — — — — —
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — —
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — —
Worker 0.08 0.07 0.82 0.00 0.00
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Average Daily — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Annual — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
4. Operations Emissions Details
4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use
4.1.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use ROG NOx CO PM10E PM2.5E
3000 Shattuck Detailed Report, 2/19/2025
21 / 41
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — —
Apartments Mid Rise 2.91 1.86 17.6 0.03 0.03
Strip Mall 0.17 0.13 1.32 < 0.005 < 0.005
Total 3.08 2.00 19.0 0.03 0.03
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — —
Apartments Mid Rise 2.77 2.19 18.0 0.03 0.03
Strip Mall 0.16 0.16 1.27 < 0.005 < 0.005
Total 2.93 2.34 19.3 0.03 0.03
Annual — — — — —
Apartments Mid Rise 0.47 0.36 2.94 < 0.005 < 0.005
Strip Mall 0.03 0.02 0.20 < 0.005 < 0.005
Total 0.50 0.38 3.14 0.01 < 0.005
4.2. Energy
4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use ROG NOx CO PM10E PM2.5E
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — —
Apartments Mid Rise — — — — —
Strip Mall — — — — —
Total — — — — —
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — —
Apartments Mid Rise — — — — —
Strip Mall — — — — —
Total — — — — —
Annual — — — — —
Apartments Mid Rise — — — — —
3000 Shattuck Detailed Report, 2/19/2025
22 / 41
Strip Mall — — — — —
Total — — — — —
4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use ROG NOx CO PM10E PM2.5E
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — —
Apartments Mid Rise 0.02 0.37 0.16 0.03 0.03
Strip Mall < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005
Total 0.02 0.37 0.16 0.03 0.03
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — —
Apartments Mid Rise 0.02 0.37 0.16 0.03 0.03
Strip Mall < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005
Total 0.02 0.37 0.16 0.03 0.03
Annual — — — — —
Apartments Mid Rise < 0.005 0.07 0.03 0.01 0.01
Strip Mall < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005
Total < 0.005 0.07 0.03 0.01 0.01
4.3. Area Emissions by Source
4.3.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Source ROG NOx CO PM10E PM2.5E
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — —
Consumer Products 1.74 — — — —
Architectural Coatings 0.31 — — — —
Total 2.05 — — — —
3000 Shattuck Detailed Report, 2/19/2025
23 / 41
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — —
Consumer Products 1.74 — — — —
Architectural Coatings 0.31 — — — —
Total 2.05 — — — —
Annual — — — — —
Consumer Products 0.32 — — — —
Architectural Coatings 0.06 — — — —
Total 0.37 — — — —
4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use
4.4.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use ROG NOx CO PM10E PM2.5E
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — —
Apartments Mid Rise — — — — —
Strip Mall — — — — —
Total — — — — —
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — —
Apartments Mid Rise — — — — —
Strip Mall — — — — —
Total — — — — —
Annual — — — — —
Apartments Mid Rise — — — — —
Strip Mall — — — — —
Total — — — — —
4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use
3000 Shattuck Detailed Report, 2/19/2025
24 / 41
4.5.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use ROG NOx CO PM10E PM2.5E
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — —
Apartments Mid Rise — — — — —
Strip Mall — — — — —
Total — — — — —
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — —
Apartments Mid Rise — — — — —
Strip Mall — — — — —
Total — — — — —
Annual — — — — —
Apartments Mid Rise — — — — —
Strip Mall — — — — —
Total — — — — —
4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use
4.6.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use ROG NOx CO PM10E PM2.5E
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — —
Apartments Mid Rise — — — — —
Strip Mall — — — — —
Total — — — — —
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — —
Apartments Mid Rise — — — — —
Strip Mall — — — — —
3000 Shattuck Detailed Report, 2/19/2025
25 / 41
Total — — — — —
Annual — — — — —
Apartments Mid Rise — — — — —
Strip Mall — — — — —
Total — — — — —
4.7. Offroad Emissions By Equipment Type
4.7.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipment Type ROG NOx CO PM10E PM2.5E
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — —
Total — — — — —
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — —
Total — — — — —
Annual — — — — —
Total — — — — —
4.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment Type
4.8.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipment Type ROG NOx CO PM10E PM2.5E
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — —
Total — — — — —
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — —
Total — — — — —
Annual — — — — —
3000 Shattuck Detailed Report, 2/19/2025
26 / 41
Total — — — — —
4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type
4.9.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipment Type ROG NOx CO PM10E PM2.5E
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — —
Total — — — — —
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — —
Total — — — — —
Annual — — — — —
Total — — — — —
4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type
4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Vegetation ROG NOx CO PM10E PM2.5E
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — —
Total — — — — —
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — —
Total — — — — —
Annual — — — — —
Total — — — — —
4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
3000 Shattuck Detailed Report, 2/19/2025
27 / 41
Land Use ROG NOx CO PM10E PM2.5E
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — —
Total — — — — —
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — —
Total — — — — —
Annual — — — — —
Total — — — — —
4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Species ROG NOx CO PM10E PM2.5E
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — —
Avoided — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — —
Sequestered — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — —
Removed — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — —
— — — — — —
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — —
Avoided — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — —
Sequestered — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — —
Removed — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — —
— — — — — —
Annual — — — — —
3000 Shattuck Detailed Report, 2/19/2025
28 / 41
Avoided — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — —
Sequestered — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — —
Removed — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — —
— — — — — —
5. Activity Data
5.1. Construction Schedule
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Days Per Week Work Days per Phase Phase Description Demolition Demolition 7/3/2023 8/15/2023 5.00 32.0 —
Site Preparation Site Preparation 8/16/2023 8/18/2023 5.00 3.00 — Grading Grading 8/21/2023 8/28/2023 5.00 6.00 —
Building Construction Building Construction 8/29/2023 11/19/2024 5.00 321 — Paving Paving 11/20/2024 12/11/2024 5.00 16.0 —
Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 12/12/2024 1/2/2025 5.00 16.0 —
5.2. Off-Road Equipment
5.2.1. Unmitigated
Phase Name Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load Factor Demolition Tractors/Loaders/Back
hoes
Diesel Average 2.00 6.00 84.0 0.37
Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Average 1.00 1.00 367 0.40 Demolition Concrete/Industrial
Saws
Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 33.0 0.73
3000 Shattuck Detailed Report, 2/19/2025
29 / 41
Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Back Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 84.0 0.37 Site Preparation Graders Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 148 0.41 Grading Graders Diesel Average 1.00 6.00 148 0.41
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Average 1.00 6.00 367 0.40 Grading Tractors/Loaders/Back
hoes
Diesel Average 1.00 7.00 84.0 0.37
Building Construction Cranes Diesel Average 1.00 4.00 367 0.29 Building Construction Forklifts Diesel Average 2.00 6.00 82.0 0.20 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Back
hoes
Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 84.0 0.37
Paving Cement and Mortar
Mixers
Diesel Average 4.00 6.00 10.0 0.56
Paving Pavers Diesel Average 1.00 7.00 81.0 0.42
Paving Rollers Diesel Average 1.00 7.00 36.0 0.38
Paving Tractors/Loaders/Back
hoes
Diesel Average 1.00 7.00 84.0 0.37
Architectural Coating Air Compressors Diesel Average 1.00 6.00 37.0 0.48
5.3. Construction Vehicles
5.3.1. Unmitigated
Phase Name Trip Type One-Way Trips per Day Miles per Trip Vehicle Mix Site Preparation — — — —
Site Preparation Worker 5.00 11.7 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Site Preparation Vendor — 8.40 HHDT,MHDT
Site Preparation Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Site Preparation Onsite truck — — HHDT
Grading — — — —
Grading Worker 7.50 11.7 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Grading Vendor — 8.40 HHDT,MHDT
3000 Shattuck Detailed Report, 2/19/2025
30 / 41
Grading Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Grading Onsite truck — — HHDT
Building Construction — — — —
Building Construction Worker 120 11.7 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Building Construction Vendor 17.9 8.40 HHDT,MHDT
Building Construction Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Building Construction Onsite truck — — HHDT
Paving — — — —
Paving Worker 17.5 11.7 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Paving Vendor — 8.40 HHDT,MHDT
Paving Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Paving Onsite truck — — HHDT
Architectural Coating — — — —
Architectural Coating Worker 24.0 11.7 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Architectural Coating Vendor — 8.40 HHDT,MHDT
Architectural Coating Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Architectural Coating Onsite truck — — HHDT
Demolition — — — —
Demolition Worker 10.0 11.7 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Demolition Vendor — 8.40 HHDT,MHDT
Demolition Hauling 1.46 20.0 HHDT
Demolition Onsite truck — — HHDT
5.4. Vehicles
5.4.1. Construction Vehicle Control Strategies
Non-applicable. No control strategies activated by user.
5.5. Architectural Coatings
3000 Shattuck Detailed Report, 2/19/2025
31 / 41
Phase Name Residential Interior Area
Coated (sq ft)
Residential Exterior Area
Coated (sq ft)
Non-Residential Interior Area
Coated (sq ft)
Non-Residential Exterior Area
Coated (sq ft)
Parking Area Coated (sq ft)
Architectural Coating 162,476 54,159 1,643 548 0.00
5.6. Dust Mitigation
5.6.1. Construction Earthmoving Activities
Phase Name Material Imported (Ton of
Debris)
Material Exported (Ton of
Debris)
Acres Graded (acres) Material Demolished (Building
Square Footage)
Acres Paved (acres)
Demolition 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,000 —
Site Preparation 0.00 0.00 20.5 0.00 —
Grading 0.00 0.00 15.8 0.00 —
Paving 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
5.6.2. Construction Earthmoving Control Strategies
Control Strategies Applied Frequency (per day) PM10 Reduction PM2.5 Reduction Water Exposed Area 2 61% 61%
5.7. Construction Paving
Land Use Area Paved (acres) % Asphalt
Apartments Mid Rise — 0%
Strip Mall 0.00 0%
5.8. Construction Electricity Consumption and Emissions Factors kWh per Y ear and Emission Factor (lb/MWh)
Y ear kWh per Y ear CO2 CH4 N2O
2023 0.00 204 0.03 < 0.005
2024 0.00 204 0.03 < 0.005
3000 Shattuck Detailed Report, 2/19/2025
32 / 41
2025 0.00 204 0.03 < 0.005
5.9. Operational Mobile Sources
5.9.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Type Trips/Weekday Trips/Saturday Trips/Sunday Trips/Y ear VMT/Weekday VMT/Saturday VMT/Sunday VMT/Y ear Apartments Mid
Rise
903 815 679 313,337 4,857 4,383 3,651 1,685,134
Strip Mall 48.5 46.0 22.4 16,219 405 384 187 135,264
5.10. Operational Area Sources
5.10.1. Hearths
5.10.1.1. Unmitigated
5.10.2. Architectural Coatings
Residential Interior Area Coated (sq
ft)
Residential Exterior Area Coated (sq
ft)
Non-Residential Interior Area Coated
(sq ft)
Non-Residential Exterior Area
Coated (sq ft)
Parking Area Coated (sq ft)
162475.875 54,159 1,643 548 —
5.10.3. Landscape Equipment
Season Unit Value
Snow Days day/yr 0.00
Summer Days day/yr 180
5.11. Operational Energy Consumption
5.11.1. Unmitigated
3000 Shattuck Detailed Report, 2/19/2025
33 / 41
Electricity (kWh/yr) and CO2 and CH4 and N2O and Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Land Use Electricity (kWh/yr) CO2 CH4 N2O Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Apartments Mid Rise 566,301 204 0.0330 0.0040 1,461,476 Strip Mall 9,357 204 0.0330 0.0040 6,240
5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption
5.12.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Indoor Water (gal/year) Outdoor Water (gal/year) Apartments Mid Rise 5,894,801 56,141
Strip Mall 81,109 0.00
5.13. Operational Waste Generation
5.13.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Waste (ton/year) Cogeneration (kWh/year)
Apartments Mid Rise 123 —
Strip Mall 1.15 —
5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment
5.14.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Type Equipment Type Refrigerant GWP Quantity (kg) Operations Leak Rate Service Leak Rate Times Serviced Apartments Mid Rise Average room A/C &
Other residential A/C
and heat pumps
R-410A 2,088 < 0.005 2.50 2.50 10.0
Apartments Mid Rise Household
refrigerators and/or
freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.12 0.60 0.00 1.00
3000 Shattuck Detailed Report, 2/19/2025
34 / 41
18.04.004.00< 0.0052,088R-410AStrip Mall Other commercial A/C and heat pumps
Strip Mall Stand-alone retail
refrigerators and
freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.04 1.00 0.00 1.00
Strip Mall Walk-in refrigerators
and freezers
R-404A 3,922 < 0.005 7.50 7.50 20.0
5.15. Operational Off-Road Equipment
5.15.1. Unmitigated
Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load Factor
5.16. Stationary Sources
5.16.1. Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps
Equipment Type Fuel Type Number per Day Hours per Day Hours per Y ear Horsepower Load Factor
5.16.2. Process Boilers
Equipment Type Fuel Type Number Boiler Rating (MMBtu/hr) Daily Heat Input (MMBtu/day) Annual Heat Input (MMBtu/yr)
5.17. User Defined
Equipment Type Fuel Type
— —
5.18. Vegetation
5.18.1. Land Use Change
3000 Shattuck Detailed Report, 2/19/2025
35 / 41
5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
Vegetation Land Use Type Vegetation Soil Type Initial Acres Final Acres
5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type
5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
Biomass Cover Type Initial Acres Final Acres
5.18.2. Sequestration
5.18.2.1. Unmitigated
Tree Type Number Electricity Saved (kWh/year) Natural Gas Saved (btu/year)
6. Climate Risk Detailed Report
6.1. Climate Risk Summary
Cal-Adapt midcentury 2040–2059 average projections for four hazards are reported below for your project location. These are under Representation Concentration Pathway (RCP) 8.5 which assumes GHG emissions will continue to rise strongly through 2050 and then plateau around 2100.
Climate Hazard Result for Project Location Unit
Temperature and Extreme Heat 7.10 annual days of extreme heat Extreme Precipitation 7.50 annual days with precipitation above 20 mm Sea Level Rise 0.00 meters of inundation depth
Wildfire 0.00 annual hectares burned
Temperature and Extreme Heat data are for grid cell in which your project are located. The projection is based on the 98th historical percentile of daily maximum/minimum temperatures from observed historical data (32 climate model ensemble from Cal-Adapt, 2040–2059 average under RCP 8.5). Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi.
Extreme Precipitation data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The threshold of 20 mm is equivalent to about ¾ an inch of rain, which would be light to moderate rainfall if received over a full day or heavy rain if received over a period of 2 to 4 hours. Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi.
Sea Level Rise data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The projections are from Radke et al. (2017), as reported in Cal-Adapt (Radke et al., 2017, CEC-500-2017-008), and consider inundation location and depth for the San Francisco Bay, the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta and California coast resulting different increments of sea level rise coupled with extreme storm events. Users may select from four scenarios to view the range in potential inundation depth for the grid cell. The four scenarios are: No rise, 0.5 meter, 1.0 meter, 1.41 meters