Agenda packet — Big Bear Lake City Council, February 14, 2024 (part 1 of 2)

CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
FEBRUARY 14, 2024
Closed Session: 4:00 p.m., ECR, Civic Center, 39707 Big Bear Boulevard, Big Bear Lake, CA 92315 Open Session: 5:00 p.m., Hofert Hall, Civic Center, 39707 Big Bear Boulevard, Big Bear Lake, CA 92315

COUNCILMEMBERS

MAYOR PERRI MELNICK

MAYOR PRO TEM KENDI SEGOVIA

COUNCILMEMBER RICK HERRICK

COUNCILMEMBER BYNETTE MOTE

COUNCILMEMBER RANDALL PUTZ

CITY STAFF

CITY MANAGER ERIK SUND

ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER/CITY CLERK ERICA STEPHENSON

CITY ATTORNEY STEPHEN DEITSCH
If members of the public cannot attend the meeting, the City encourages the public to submit written public communications about any item on this meeting agenda, or about any subject matter within the jurisdiction of the City, to the City Clerk either in person, via mail or by email at [email protected]. If your comment is related to a specific Agenda item, please identify the Agenda item in the header of your letter or the subject line of your email. All written communications received by the City Clerk prior to the meeting will be distributed to the City Council prior to the start of the meeting, however, the public is encouraged to submit comments by 8:00 am on the day of the meeting to ensure adequate time for Council review and consideration.

OPEN SESSION – 4:00 P.M.

CALL TO ORDER

ROLL CALL
CLOSED SESSION COMMUNICATIONS - Any member of the public is entitled to speak on Closed Session Agenda items. If you wish to address any other items listed on the agenda, you must do so during Open Session.

DECLARATION OF CLOSED SESSION ITEMS

1. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – PENDING LITIGATION pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1)
Name of Case: Recall Mote Now! a Political Action Committee (FPPC ID# 1449920), and Bernard Dale Bryan v. Erica Stephenson, City Clerk of the City of Big Bear Lake Court & Case No: San Bernardino Superior Court, Case No. CIV SB 2218531

2. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS pursuant to Gov. Code Section 54956.8 Property: Vacant Property (Parking Lot) Along Rathbun Drive, APN: 2328-383-01 City Negotiators: City Manager Erik Sund
Negotiating Party: Wade Reeser, President of Big Bear Mountain Resort Under Negotiation: Price & Terms of Payment

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
FEBRUARY 14, 2024 - Page 2

3. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS pursuant to Gov. Code Section 54956.8 Property: 40940 Pennsylvania Ave (Former Big Bear Elementary School Site), APN:0309-111-01 City Negotiator: City Manager Erik Sund
Negotiating Party: Bear Valley Unified School District
Under Negotiation: Price & Terms of Payment

RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION
RECONVENE OPEN SESSION – 5 P.M.

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

INVOCATION
An Invocation provided by Pastor Robert Grand from the Summit Christian Fellowship.

PRESENTATIONS
• Employee Presentations:
o Presentation of a 10-year Employee Service Award to Tammy Rawlings, Permit Technician
o New Employee Introduction of Ryan Dorsett, Public Works Supervisor – Public Works Department
o New Employee Introduction of Jackie Rogers, Communications & Events Specialist – Management Services Department
• Presentation from Sean Sullivan, Assistant City Manager providing a Capital Project update. • Presentation from Kelly Tinker, Economic Development Manager providing a Beautify Big Bear project update.

RESULTS OF CLOSED SESSION

CITY STAFF ANNOUNCEMENTS IN RESPONSE TO PUBLIC COMMENTS MADE AT THE 12/13/2023 & 12/19/2023 CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS
PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS (PART 1) - At this time, general Public comment is permitted only on consent calendar items and other matters not listed on the posted agenda that are within the subject matter and jurisdiction of the City. Public comment on specific items listed on the posted agenda, such as public hearing & discussion or action items, will be taken later in the meeting when the item is called for discussion. When addressing the City Council, please keep the following in mind: State law prohibits the City Council from taking any action on items not listed on the agenda and therefore prevents the City Council from replying to most public comments. Each speaker has a 3 minute maximum time limit subject to adjustment at the discretion of the Presiding Officer. To allow City Council sufficient time to address agendized City business, if Public Communications Part 1 exceeds one hour, the remaining public speakers will be allowed to provide public comments during Public Communications Part 2. Participants cannot cede their speaking time to another person.

To help ensure a respectful and efficient meeting, please address the Council directly, not the audience, and refrain from disruptive comments and applause. We appreciate your attendance and your participation in our local government proceedings.

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
FEBRUARY 14, 2024 - Page 3

1. CONSENT CALENDAR

1.1 APPROVE DEMANDS – CHECK ISSUE DATE 12/01/23 THROUGH 1/25/24 IN THE AMOUNT OF $5,559,464.91 AND THE NOVEMBER AND DECEMBER 2023 TREASURER’S REPORTS

1.2 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING A DELEGATE FOR THE MOJAVE DESERT

MOUNTAIN INTEGRATED WASTE JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY
Staff’s recommendation: Adopt a resolution confirming the Mayor’s appointment of Mayor Pro Tem Segovia as the City’s delegate and Councilmember Mote as the City’s alternate to the Mojave Desert Mountain Integrated Waste Joint Powers Authority Board of Directors.

1.3 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING A DELEGATE FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN

BERNARDINO SOLID WASTE ADVISORY TASK FORCE
Staff’s recommendation: Adopt a resolution confirming the Mayor’s appointment of Mayor Pro Tem Segovia as the City’s delegate and Councilmember Mote as the City’s alternate for the County of San Bernardino Solid Waste Advisory Task Force.

1.4 RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN
Staff’s recommendation: Adopt a Resolution Adopting the Local Roadway Safety Plan and authorizing its submittal to the California Department of Transportation.

1.5 RESOLUTION APPROVING A TRAIL EASEMENT AGREEMENT WITH BIG

BEAR MOUNTAIN RESORT FOR RATHBUN CREEK TRAIL PHASE III
Staff’s recommendation: Adopt a Resolution Approving a Trail Easement Agreement with Big Bear Mountain Resort for the Rathbun Creek Trail Phase III and authorizing the recording of said easement with the San Bernardino County Recorder’s Office.

1.6 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING SUBMITTAL OF A CLAIM TO THE SAN

BERNARDINO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY FOR
TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT ARTICLE 3 FUNDS FOR THE

STANFIELD MARSH OUTDOOR RECREATION AND EDUCATION TRAIL

SEGMENT II (SMORE II) PROJECT
Staff’s recommendation: Adopt a Resolution Authorizing Submittal of a Claim to the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority for Transportation Development Act Article 3 Funds for the Stanfield Marsh Outdoor Recreation and Education Trail Segment II (SMORE II) Project.

1.7 NOTICES OF COMPLETION FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 CAPITAL

IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
FEBRUARY 14, 2024 - Page 4
Staff’s recommendation: Authorize the acceptance of work and filing of the Notices of Completion for Fiscal Year 2023-24 Capital Improvement Projects, which include the City Hall Roof Restoration Project, Cottage Lane Sewer Improvements Project, Fence Replacement at the 19-Acre Property, Sewer Lift Station No. 12 Projects, and the Sanitary Sewer Cleaning and CCTV Inspection Project.

1.8 AUTHORIZATION OF BID SOLICITATIONS FOR UPCOMING CAPITAL

IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Staff’s recommendation: Authorize staff to proceed with bid solicitations for the following Capital Improvement Projects: Annual Citywide Street Sweeping Services, Village Accessibility Improvements and the Annual Citywide Line Striping Project and find the applicable projects exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR

2. PUBLIC HEARING - Any person may appear and be heard in support or in opposition to the proposal at the time of the hearing. If you challenge the action in court or an administrative proceeding, you may be limited to raising only those issues which you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in the notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City at or before the public hearing.

2.1 RESOLUTIONS RELATED TO THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) 2024-2025 PROGRAM YEAR APPLICATIONS AND FUNDING

RECOMMENDATIONS
Staff recommendation: (1) Conduct a public hearing; and (2) adopt a Resolution to Make a Project Funding Recommendation to the County of San Bernardino Using the City’s 2024-25 Community Development Block Grant Allocation of $35,853; and (3) adopt a Resolution Recommending Appropriation of General Fund Grants for Local Public Service Programs Requesting 2024-2025 CDBG Funds.

3. DISCUSSION/ACTION ITEMS

3.1 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AMENDMENTS TO THE BIG BEAR AREA

REGIONAL WASTEWATER AGENCY JOINT POWERS AND OPERATING

AGREEMENTS
Staff’s recommendation: Adopt a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Big Bear Lake Authorizing Amendment No. 6 to the Operating Agreement No. 1 Between the Big Bear Area Regional Wastewater Agency, Big Bear Lake Sanitation District, Big Bear City Community Services District and County of San Bernardino, and Seventh Amendment to the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement Between Big Bear City Community Services District, City of Big Bear Lake and San Bernardino County Creating the Big Bear Area Regional Wastewater Agency.

PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS (PART 2)

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
FEBRUARY 14, 2024 - Page 5

4. COMMENTS, ANNOUNCEMENTS & ADDITIONAL CITY BUSINESS
• CITY CLERK, CITY ATTORNEY & CITY MANAGER COMMENTS
• COUNCILMEMBER BOARD/COMMITTEE REPORTS & COMMENTS

ADJOURNMENT

TENTATIVE ITEMS TO BE CONSIDERED AT A FUTURE PUBLIC MEETING Quarterly Financial Update (October – December 2023) – March 13, 2024 Quarterly Fire Protection District Meeting – April 10, 2024 FY 24/25 Budget Workshop – Monday, May 13, 2024

DECLARATION OF POSTING
I hereby certify under penalty of perjury, under the laws of the State of California, that the foregoing agenda was posted in accordance with the applicable legal requirements. Dated this 8th day of February 2024.

Erica Stephenson, City Clerk

The City of Big Bear Lake wishes to make all of its public meetings accessible to the public. If you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk’s Office at (909) 866-5831. Notification 72 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting.

CITY OF BIG BEAR LAKE
February 14, 2024
City Council Meeting
Presentation Materials
City of Big Bear Lake
39707 Big Bear Blvd
PO Box 10000
Big Bear Lake CA 92315
(909) 866-5831
[email protected]
“Without A Sense Of Caring,
There Can Be No Sense Of
Community.”
-Anthony J. D’Angelo
Beautify
Big Bear
Lake
The Boulevard
& Beyond

ALL OWNERS & TENANTS
located along/adjacent to Big Bear Boulevard,
the Moonridge Corridor, and beyond
within the City of Big Bear Lake.

The City of Big Bear Lake’s 2021-2023
Economic Development Advisory Committee:

Chris Barnes • Andrew Goodwin Brown
Gina DeSantis • Danielle Goldsmith
Jeff Holoubek • Bynette Mote • Mike Sannes
Tony Tamberchi • Matthew Vecchio
Having the most beautiful community starts with all
of us! Our City has a Development Code established
with many objectives for Big Bear Lake, including:
• A safe community with a high quality of life for
residents, second homeowners, business owners,
investors, and visitors
• An aesthetically pleasing appearance in keeping
with the natural mountain environment
• To support economic vitality through attracting
diverse businesses, education, and compliance
• To reduce hazards to the public
In Cooperation With
Photo Credit: Dennis Bentson
Brought To You By
PROPERTY ASSESSMENT: Take a good look at
your property. What’s the first impression? Is
it code compliant? Is there defensible space?
ADDRESS ISSUES: Make a fix-it list, budget,
and plan to tackle everything from safety
issues to cosmetic aesthetics.

CONNECT WITH CODE: Do you have questions
about displays, signs, landscaping, or other
rules? Call us to discuss.

TALK TO YOUR NEIGHBORS: Do they need
help? Share tips, resources, and make it a
team effort to beautify your block.

Why Who
Make A PACT To Act!
Owners & Tenants
Take Action
When & What

ANNUAL PARTNERSHIP APPROACH

SPRING/
SUMMER
FALL/
WINTER
City Code Officers
Inspect & Enforce
P
A
C
T
Responsibilities
Of All Owners
& Tenants
www.citybigbearlake.com/beautifybigbearlake
SIGNS - Keep well-maintained, clean, and
compliant with regulations. Repair when faded
or damaged. Call us for temporary signage
rules.

LANDSCAPING - Keep trimmed and free of
weeds. Drought-resistant, Firewise® plants
and trees are encouraged.

SIDEWALKS - Keep well-maintained, clean,
and swept/shoveled. Report cracks or damage
to the correct authorities for repair.

OUTDOOR DISPLAYS & DINING - Keep out
of public right-of-way and keep compliant with
regulations.

TRASH - Keep property free of
litter, debris, and
construction
materials. Store
in approved
containers out
of sight from
main road
traffic.

HELPFUL

CODE COMPLIANCE

RESOURCES
• City of Big Bear Lake Municipal Code
Visit library.municode.com and search
“Big Bear Lake, CA” to review code specifics
• Big Bear Fire Authority
• San Bernardino County Health & Safety Code
• California Building Code
• California Fire Code
Take Action -- Property Assessment
LIGHTING - Keep well-maintained, working,
and clean. Dark Sky fixtures and bulbs are
encouraged.

PARKING - Keep all spaces and lots
well-maintained, clean, and freshly striped in
compliance with State/Local regulations.

FIREWISE® DEFENSIBLE SPACE - Secure
property indoors and outdoors in compliance
with State/Local fire regulations.

SEASONAL MAINTENANCE - Clear pine
needles, leaves, snow, and other debris from
walkways, roof, gutters, and all appropriate
areas. Report/clear blocked storm drains as
appropriate.
1 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
2 3
4 6
7 5 8
10 11
12 13
14 EXTERIOR SIDING & TRIM - Keep paint
and/or stain fresh, and use natural mountain
colors. Keep well-maintained with minimal
chipping, peeling or fading.

ROOFING & GUTTERS - Keep clean,
well-maintained, and free of debris. Use
approved materials and colors when replacing.

Wood shingles are not allowed.

STORAGE - Keep items inside buildings or
sheds. Park unused vehicles or trailers out of
sight from main road traffic. Cargo containers
are generally not allowed.

WINDOWS/DOORS - Keep clean and
well-maintained. Repair broken or damaged
glass. The use of plywood for boarding up is for
temporary use only.

FENCING - Keep well-maintained with fresh
paint and/or stain. Repair any damage.

Remove all banners and signs. Call us for chain
link rules.
1 2
3 4
5 BUILDING STRUCTURE CURB APPEAL SAFETY
9 CITY OF BIG BEAR LAKE
February 14, 2024
City Council Meeting
Consent Calendar
Reports
Check# Vendor/Employee Date Amount
89733 Department of Justice 12/07/23 32.00
89734 California State Water Resources Control Board 12/07/23 7,067.00 89735 San Bernardino County Solid Waste Mgmt Division 12/07/23 586.61 89736 Alliant Insurance Services, Inc. 12/07/23 329.00
89737 American Auto Body LLC 12/07/23 5,978.33
89738 Bad Bear Sportswear 12/07/23 67.88
89739 Bay City Equipment Industries Inc 12/07/23 4,581.83 89741 Big Bear Lake Urgent Care Inc 12/07/23 290.00
89742 Clifford Fowler 12/07/23 1,747.48
89743 Birtcher Anderson & Davis Assoc Inc. 12/07/23 9,167.00 89744 Bravo Arts Solutions LLC 12/07/23 61.05
89745 Peter Joseph Bucknam 12/07/23 6,169.00
89746 Butchers Blocks & Building Materials 12/07/23 1,093.40 89747 Bear Valley Printing Inc 12/07/23 480.25
89748 Cintas Corporation 12/07/23 598.01
89749 Dapeer Rosenblit & Litvak LLP 12/07/23 8,947.83
89750 Lumber City Corp. 12/07/23 243.48
89751 DKS Associates 12/07/23 4,200.00
89752 Docu‐Trust 12/07/23 55.00
89753 Fisher Integrated, Inc. 12/07/23 1,200.00
89754 Gibson Transportation Consulting, Inc. 12/07/23 10,993.75 89755 Grainger Inc. 12/07/23 431.75
89756 ICMA Membership Renewals 12/07/23 1,200.00
89757 Intelesys One, Inc. 12/07/23 12,234.28
89758 Merrell Johnson Engineering Inc 12/07/23 26,529.00 89759 Mission Linen Supply Inc. 12/07/23 784.53
89760 Michael Marcotte 12/07/23 145.00
89761 Mountain Water Co 12/07/23 120.00
89762 Genuine Auto Parts 12/07/23 16.15
89763 Nativescapes, Inc. 12/07/23 1,220.00
89765 RDO Equipment Co 12/07/23 28,386.03
89766 ROW Traffic Safety, Inc. 12/07/23 278.26
89768 Sancon Technologies, Inc. 12/07/23 81,008.88
89769 Southern California Mountains Foundation 12/07/23 222,875.20 89770 SWA Group Inc. 12/07/23 2,500.00
89771 Tom Dodson & Associates 12/07/23 600.00
89772 Alexandro Torres 12/07/23 4,256.60
89773 United Rentals (North America), Inc 12/07/23 34,478.76 89774 US Bank Corporate Payment Systems 12/07/23 42,382.48 89775 Vulcan Materials Company Inc. 12/07/23 79,400.08
89776 Waxie Sanitary Supply Inc. 12/07/23 5,940.67
89777 Willdan Engineering Inc 12/07/23 5,180.00
89778 San Bernardino County Clerk of the Board of Supervisors 12/08/23 50.00 89781 San Bernardino County Transportation Authority 12/14/23 11,870.00 89782 A Performance Towing Inc 12/14/23 7,500.00
89783 Bay City Equipment Industries Inc 12/14/23 2,242.86 City of Big Bear Lake
Checks Issued 12/01/2023 ‐ 01/25/2024
Item 1.1
Check# Vendor/Employee Date Amount
City of Big Bear Lake
Checks Issued 12/01/2023 ‐ 01/25/2024
89784 Big Bear Disposal Inc 12/14/23 644.10
89785 Big Bear Electric 12/14/23 29,182.76
89786 Best Best & Krieger LLP 12/14/23 32,137.33
89787 BlackHole Technologies Inc 12/14/23 1,955.77
89788 Butchers Blocks & Building Materials 12/14/23 1,521.58 89789 Bear Valley Printing Inc 12/14/23 210.17
89790 Calolympic Glove & Safety Co 12/14/23 774.39
89791 Car Quest Auto Parts 12/14/23 3,195.94
89792 Cintas Corporation 12/14/23 355.68
89793 Cutting Edge Supply 12/14/23 1,222.59
89794 Golden Bell Products, Inc 12/14/23 3,499.08
89795 Grainger Inc. 12/14/23 204.74
89796 Haaker Equipment Co. Inc. 12/14/23 346.22
89797 Inland Kubota, Inc 12/14/23 3,335.56
89798 Intelesys One, Inc. 12/14/23 10,168.12
89799 Knights Automotive and Performance, Inc. 12/14/23 341.60 89800 Mission Linen Supply Inc. 12/14/23 2,544.39
89801 Municipal Maintenance Equipment 12/14/23 75.75
89802 Motive Energy 12/14/23 1,865.98
89803 Mountain Trophy & Pro Shop 12/14/23 25.86
89804 Genuine Auto Parts 12/14/23 1,202.82
89805 Orkin Pest Control 12/14/23 2,641.98
89806 Romans Construction Corp. 12/14/23 18,739.33
89807 Uline 12/14/23 2,358.83
89808 Underground Service Alert Inc. 12/14/23 199.93
89809 United Rentals (North America), Inc 12/14/23 3,093.10 89813 Espyr 12/15/23 204.60
89819 TASC Client Invoices 12/15/23 88.35
89822 San Bernardino County Clerk of the Board of Supervisors 12/22/23 100.00 89823 San Bernardino County Sheriff's Dept 12/22/23 490,901.00 89824 City of Big Bear Lake Dept of Water & Power 12/22/23 2,518.66 89825 Mountain Area Regional Transit Authority 12/22/23 83,333.34 89827 BBARWA 12/22/23 1,841,659.14
89828 All Protection Alarm 12/22/23 1,998.27
89829 Big Bear Chamber of Commerce 12/22/23 162.66
89830 Big Bear Disposal Inc 12/22/23 531,466.64
89833 Butchers Blocks & Building Materials 12/22/23 102.20 89834 Bear Valley Electric 12/22/23 34,168.64
89835 Charter Communications Holdings, LLC 12/22/23 3,310.58 89837 Lumber City Corp. 12/22/23 15.49
89838 Final Touch Construction & Design Inc. 12/22/23 91,256.93 89839 Extra Space Management Inc 12/22/23 991.00
89840 Frontier Communications 12/22/23 2,716.55
89841 Geiger Supply, Inc. 12/22/23 20.88
89842 Hitchin Lucerne, Inc. 12/22/23 2,988.88
89843 Lynn Merrill And Associates, Inc. 12/22/23 924.10 Check# Vendor/Employee Date Amount
City of Big Bear Lake
Checks Issued 12/01/2023 ‐ 01/25/2024
89844 Merrell Johnson Engineering Inc 12/22/23 11,493.75 89845 Mission Linen Supply Inc. 12/22/23 1,025.37
89846 Michael Marcotte 12/22/23 1,669.00
89847 Randy Spitz 12/22/23 41.00
89848 Mountain Trophy & Pro Shop 12/22/23 51.72
89850 Gold Arc Inc. 12/22/23 440.00
89852 Quill Corporation 12/22/23 145.40
89853 Ring Central 12/22/23 2,602.55
89854 Rochester Midland Corporation 12/22/23 611.64
89856 Shred‐It 12/22/23 575.75
89858 Staples Business Credit 12/22/23 231.28
89859 United Rentals (North America), Inc 12/22/23 4,348.80 89860 Valero Marketing & Supply Co 12/22/23 384.26
89861 Verizon Wireless 12/22/23 1,347.97
89862 Volvo Construction Equipment Inc. 12/22/23 28,284.39 89863 Vulcan Materials Company Inc. 12/22/23 1,807.68
89864 Willdan Engineering Inc 12/22/23 1,260.00
89865 Department of Justice 12/28/23 64.00
89866 Addiction Medicine Consultants, Inc 12/28/23 2,175.00 89867 Airgas, Inc. 12/28/23 2,630.09
89868 Big Bear Lake Urgent Care Inc 12/28/23 125.00
89870 Peter Joseph Bucknam 12/28/23 5,576.00
89871 Butchers Blocks & Building Materials 12/28/23 358.74 89872 Bear Valley Paving, Inc. 12/28/23 10,125.00
89873 Bear Valley Printing Inc 12/28/23 39.85
89874 Charter Communications Holdings, LLC 12/28/23 1,422.05 89875 Occupational Health Centers of California 12/28/23 169.00 89876 Dapeer Rosenblit & Litvak LLP 12/28/23 1,753.81
89877 Lumber City Corp. 12/28/23 96.99
89878 Grainger Inc. 12/28/23 460.40
89879 The Grizzly 12/28/23 403.25
89880 Haaker Equipment Co. Inc. 12/28/23 146.50
89881 Hinderliter de Lamas & Assoc Inc. 12/28/23 1,885.58 89883 Industrial Specialty Products 12/28/23 391.86
89884 Intelesys One, Inc. 12/28/23 9,326.06
89885 MTS Partners Inc 12/28/23 124.99
89886 Lance Soll & Lunghard 12/28/23 4,176.90
89888 Mile High Equipment, Inc. 12/28/23 3,465.00
89889 Mission Linen Supply Inc. 12/28/23 871.14
89890 Motive Energy 12/28/23 3,830.00
89891 Mountain Trophy & Pro Shop 12/28/23 71.12
89893 Genuine Auto Parts 12/28/23 199.11
89894 Nativescapes, Inc. 12/28/23 200.00
89896 ROW Traffic Safety, Inc. 12/28/23 7,350.00
89898 Romans Construction Corp. 12/28/23 139,487.55
89900 SWA Group Inc. 12/28/23 9,813.02
Check# Vendor/Employee Date Amount
City of Big Bear Lake
Checks Issued 12/01/2023 ‐ 01/25/2024
89901 Underground Service Alert Inc. 12/28/23 259.43
89902 United Rentals (North America), Inc 12/28/23 2,174.40 89903 Waxie Sanitary Supply Inc. 12/28/23 7,150.95
89904 White Cap L.P. 12/28/23 5,159.05
89905 Willdan Engineering Inc 12/28/23 35,546.25
89910 Mountain Area Regional Transit Authority 01/04/24 41,666.67 89911 US Bank Corporate Payment Systems 01/04/24 23,015.90 89914 San Bernardino County 01/11/24 4.00
89915 San Bernardino County Vehicle Svcs Dept 01/11/24 10,779.96 89916 City of Big Bear Lake Dept of Water & Power 01/11/24 181.27 89917 South Coast AQMD 01/11/24 665.26
89918 A Performance Towing Inc 01/11/24 7,500.00
89919 Big Bear Disposal Inc 01/11/24 261,786.57
89920 BlackHole Technologies Inc 01/11/24 1,969.78
89921 Bravo Arts Solutions LLC 01/11/24 274.45
89922 Butchers Blocks & Building Materials 01/11/24 98.48 89923 Bear Valley Electric 01/11/24 11,681.72
89925 Cintas Corporation 01/11/24 607.87
89926 Occupational Health Centers of California 01/11/24 169.00 89927 Rosemary E De Lap 01/11/24 1,236.81
89929 Lumber City Corp. 01/11/24 1,577.90
89930 DKS Associates 01/11/24 1,801.21
89931 Everfence Corporation 01/11/24 65,884.50
89932 Frontier Communications 01/11/24 191.52
89933 MTS Partners Inc 01/11/24 538.77
89934 Michael Koch 01/11/24 240.00
89935 Milspec Industries Inc. 01/11/24 1,062.01
89936 Mission Linen Supply Inc. 01/11/24 130.78
89938 Mountain Water Co 01/11/24 128.00
89939 Orkin Pest Control 01/11/24 125.00
89940 Parkhouse Tire, Inc. 01/11/24 2,675.40
89941 Quill Corporation 01/11/24 466.47
89942 Nestle Waters North America 01/11/24 1,056.63
89943 SESAC 01/11/24 290.50
89944 Staples Business Credit 01/11/24 235.75
89945 Southwest Gas Corporation 01/11/24 17,544.37
89946 TerryBerry Company, LLC 01/11/24 625.78
89947 Triple Crown Products, Inc. 01/11/24 296.66
89948 Underground Service Alert Inc. 01/11/24 177.18
89949 United Rentals (North America), Inc 01/11/24 30,229.75 89950 Vulcan Materials Company Inc. 01/11/24 1,611.77
89951 Waxie Sanitary Supply Inc. 01/11/24 61.08
89952 White Cap L.P. 01/11/24 5,784.00
89957 Espyr 01/11/24 204.60
89963 TASC Client Invoices 01/11/24 88.35
89968 California State Water Resources Control Board 01/19/24 3,746.00 Check# Vendor/Employee Date Amount
City of Big Bear Lake
Checks Issued 12/01/2023 ‐ 01/25/2024
89969 San Bernardino County Sheriff's Dept 01/19/24 510,835.60 89970 San Bernardino County Vehicle Svcs Dept 01/19/24 11,240.11 89971 City of Big Bear Lake Dept of Water & Power 01/19/24 4,819.83 89972 Airgas, Inc. 01/19/24 292.24
89974 Big Bear Lake Urgent Care Inc 01/19/24 125.00
89975 Big Bear Paint Center 01/19/24 27.47
89976 Clifford Fowler 01/19/24 8,562.11
89978 Burtronics Business Systems 01/19/24 37.64
89979 Bear Valley Electric 01/19/24 11,453.84
89980 Bear Valley Printing Inc 01/19/24 372.82
89981 Bear Valley Tree Care, Inc. 01/19/24 1,068.75
89982 Car Quest Auto Parts 01/19/24 763.20
89983 Cintas Corporation 01/19/24 762.90
89984 DKS Associates 01/19/24 106.90
89985 Frontier Communications 01/19/24 2,520.96
89986 Geiger Supply, Inc. 01/19/24 26.83
89987 MTS Partners Inc 01/19/24 105.60
89988 Randy Spitz 01/19/24 41.00
89989 Mountain Trophy & Pro Shop 01/19/24 90.51
89990 Genuine Auto Parts 01/19/24 1,702.26
89991 Nielsen Merksamer Parrinello Gross & Leoni, LLP 01/19/24 5,618.71 89993 Orkin Pest Control 01/19/24 366.98
89994 ROW Traffic Safety, Inc. 01/19/24 13,043.42
89995 Safeguard Business Systems Inc 01/19/24 206.08
89996 Storm Water Innovative Solutions Inc 01/19/24 10,500.00 89997 Statewide Traffic Safety and Signs Inc 01/19/24 3,170.46 89998 Tripepi, Smith & Associates, Inc. 01/19/24 3,890.00 89999 Twin Bear Equipment Rental, Inc. 01/19/24 140.90
90000 United Rentals (North America), Inc 01/19/24 4,592.31 90002 White Cap L.P. 01/19/24 5,320.81
90006 San Bernardino County 01/25/24 2.00
90007 San Bernardino County Fire Protection District 01/25/24 5,527.00 90008 City of Big Bear Lake Dept of Water & Power 01/25/24 80.70 90010 Airgas, Inc. 01/25/24 27.62
90011 All Valley Environmental 01/25/24 3,200.00
90012 Big Bear Disposal Inc 01/25/24 665.83
90013 Butchers Blocks & Building Materials 01/25/24 70.27 90014 Bear Valley Printing Inc 01/25/24 1,090.84
90015 Charter Communications Holdings, LLC 01/25/24 3,229.94 90016 Lumber City Corp. 01/25/24 256.18
90019 Grainger Inc. 01/25/24 737.67
90020 Haaker Equipment Co. Inc. 01/25/24 1,466.88
90021 Harris Computer Systems 01/25/24 6,522.51
90022 Intelesys One, Inc. 01/25/24 616.96
90023 League of California Cities 01/25/24 3,585.00
90024 Mission Linen Supply Inc. 01/25/24 3,656.81
Check# Vendor/Employee Date Amount
City of Big Bear Lake
Checks Issued 12/01/2023 ‐ 01/25/2024
90025 Mojave Desert & Mountain 01/25/24 3,959.00
90026 Motive Energy 01/25/24 410.00
90027 PlanetBids, Inc. 01/25/24 3,677.90
90028 Rochester Midland Corporation 01/25/24 611.64
90030 SWA Group Inc. 01/25/24 3,375.10
90031 Tom Dodson & Associates 01/25/24 525.00
90032 Volvo Construction Equipment Inc. 01/25/24 1,644.41 90033 Willdan Engineering Inc 01/25/24 36,691.75
ACH AccuSource, Inc. 12/14/23 182.05
ACH AccuSource, Inc. 01/11/24 476.05
ACH Gary Payne 12/14/23 550.00
ACH Gary Payne 12/22/23 550.00
ACH Phase II Systems 12/28/23 2,202.80
ACH Phase II Systems 01/25/24 5,202.80
ACH S Porter Inc 12/07/23 3,040.00
ACH S Porter Inc 12/14/23 2,500.00
ACH S Porter Inc 12/22/23 108,725.65
ACH S Porter Inc 12/28/23 83,028.00
ACH S Porter Inc 01/19/24 8,160.00
ACH S Porter Inc 01/25/24 3,000.00
ACH What's Up Big Bear 12/22/23 360.00
5,559,464.91
Check# Vendor/Employee Transaction Amount
City Council 4110
89763 Nativescapes, Inc. 12/07/23 1,220.00
89774 US Bank Corporate Payment Systems 12/07/23 4,188.18 89911 US Bank Corporate Payment Systems 01/04/24 267.63 90023 League of California Cities 01/25/24 3,585.00
City Council Total 9,260.81
City Manager 4120
89756 ICMA Membership Renewals 12/07/23 1,200.00
89774 US Bank Corporate Payment Systems 12/07/23 2,512.85 89911 US Bank Corporate Payment Systems 01/04/24 396.36 City Manager Total 4,109.21
City Clerk 4130
89747 Bear Valley Printing Inc 12/07/23 174.64
89752 Docu‐Trust 12/07/23 55.0089774 US Bank Corporate Payment Systems 12/07/23 1,648.44 89789 Bear Valley Printing Inc 12/14/23 174.64
89798 Intelesys One, Inc. 12/14/23 264.96
89856 Shred‐It 12/22/23 575.7589858 Staples Business Credit 12/22/23 7.85 89911 US Bank Corporate Payment Systems 01/04/24 11,317.35 89969 San Bernardino County Sheriff's Dept 01/19/24 17,828.70 90022 Intelesys One, Inc. 01/25/24 616.96
City Clerk Total 32,664.29
Finance 4140
89852 Quill Corporation 12/22/23 145.40
89881 Hinderliter de Lamas & Assoc Inc. 12/28/23 1,885.58 89886 Lance Soll & Lunghard 12/28/23 3,248.70
89911 US Bank Corporate Payment Systems 01/04/24 376.22 89941 Quill Corporation 01/11/24 77.5989995 Safeguard Business Systems Inc 01/19/24 206.08 ACH Phase II Systems 01/25/24 3,000.00
Finance Services Total 8,939.57
Human Resources 4150
89733 Department of Justice 12/07/23 32.00
89736 Alliant Insurance Services, Inc. 12/07/23 329.00
89737 American Auto Body LLC 12/07/23 5,978.33
89741 Big Bear Lake Urgent Care Inc 12/07/23 290.00
89774 US Bank Corporate Payment Systems 12/07/23 12,525.59 89789 Bear Valley Printing Inc 12/14/23 35.53
89813 Espyr 12/15/23 204.6089819 TASC Client Invoices 12/15/23 88.35 89858 Staples Business Credit 12/22/23 223.43
89865 Department of Justice 12/28/23 64.00
89866 Addiction Medicine Consultants, Inc 12/28/23 2,175.00 89868 Big Bear Lake Urgent Care Inc
Honorary Tree Plantings
League Conference Expenses/Council Provisions
Council Provisions
Annual Membership Dues
Annual Membership Dues
League Conf Exp/Employee & Community Appreciation/Office Supplies Community Gathering/Meeting Expense/Digital Subscriptions Armed Forces Banners
Document Storage
Signature Event Expenses/Community Outreach/Office Supplies Armed Forces Banners
Records Request Support
Document Shredding
Office Supplies
Snow Removal Guides/Signature Event Exp/Year‐End Gathering/Office Supplies Signature Event Expense ‐ 4th of July and Tour de Big Bear Records Request Support
Office Supplies
Professional ServicesProfessional Services
CSMFO Annual Memberships/Office Supplies
Office Supplies
Tax Forms
GASB 67 & 68 Disclosure Report
Fingerprint Apps
Special Event InsuranceVehicle Repair Damage Claim
Recruitment Expense
Commercial Driving Training/Conference Exp/Recruitment/Office Supplies Employee Appreciation
EAP Services
Administrative Fees
Office Supplies
Fingerprint Apps
Annual DOT Drug & Alcohol Testing Program
Recruitment Expense 12/28/23 125.00
City of Big Bear Lake
Expenditure By Department
Checks Issued 12/01/2023 ‐ 01/25/2024
Check# Vendor/Employee Transaction Amount
City of Big Bear Lake
Expenditure By Department
Checks Issued 12/01/2023 ‐ 01/25/2024
89875 Occupational Health Centers of California Recruitment Expense 12/28/23 169.00 89879 The Grizzly Recruitment Expense 12/28/23 98.0089911 US Bank Corporate Payment Systems 01/04/24 5,606.43 89926 Occupational Health Centers of California 01/11/24 169.00 89946 TerryBerry Company, LLC 01/11/24 625.78
89957 Espyr 01/11/24 204.6089963 TASC Client Invoices 01/11/24 88.35 89974 Big Bear Lake Urgent Care Inc 01/19/24 125.00
ACH AccuSource, Inc. 12/14/23 182.05ACH AccuSource, Inc. 01/11/24 476.05ACH Phase II Systems 12/28/23 2,202.80 ACH Phase II Systems 01/25/24 2,202.80
Human Resources Total 34,220.69
City Attorney 4170
89749 Dapeer Rosenblit & Litvak LLP 12/07/23 8,947.83
89786 Best Best & Krieger LLP 12/14/23 32,137.33
89876 Dapeer Rosenblit & Litvak LLP 12/28/23 1,753.81
89879 The Grizzly 12/28/23 305.25
89991 Nielsen Merksamer Parrinello Gross & Leoni, LLP 01/19/24 5,618.71 City Attorney Total 48,762.93
Traffic Safety 4230
89834 Bear Valley Electric 12/22/23 1,026.75
89979 Bear Valley Electric 01/19/24 407.20
Traffic Safety Total 1,433.95
Law Enforcement 4250
89823 San Bernardino County Sheriff's Dept 12/22/23 490,901.00 89969 San Bernardino County Sheriff's Dept 01/19/24 493,006.90 Law Enforcement Total 983,907.90
Animal Regulation 4260
89934 Michael Koch 01/11/24 240.0089939 Orkin Pest Control 01/11/24 125.00 Animal Regulation Total 365.00
Engineering 4310
89754 Gibson Transportation Consulting, Inc. 12/07/23 7,460.00 89758 Merrell Johnson Engineering Inc 12/07/23 11,287.00 89774 US Bank Corporate Payment Systems 12/07/23 113.62 89777 Willdan Engineering Inc 12/07/23 1,260.00
89778 San Bernardino County Clerk of the Board of Supervisors 12/08/23 50.00 89822 San Bernardino County Clerk of the Board of Supervisors 12/22/23 100.00 89844 Merrell Johnson Engineering Inc 12/22/23 4,794.75 89864 Willdan Engineering Inc 12/22/23 1,260.00
89911 US Bank Corporate Payment Systems 01/04/24 957.32 89915 San Bernardino County Vehicle Svcs Dept 01/11/24 344.18 89970 San Bernardino County Vehicle Svcs Dept
Conference Expenses/Year‐End Gathering/Interview Provisions/Training Exp Recruitment ExpenseService Awards
EAP Services
Administrative Fees
Recruitment Expense
Recruitment ExpenseRecruitment Expense
PARS Administrative Fees
PARS Administrative Fees
Professional Legal ServicesProfessional Legal ServicesProfessional Legal ServicesLegal NoticesProfessional Legal Services Electricity Usage
Electricity Usage
Monthly Sheriff Contract
Monthly Sheriff Contract/Qtrly Expenses & OT/Office Specialist Service Credit Maintenance & Repairs
Pest Control Service
Professional Services
Professional Services
Meeting Expense
Professional Services
Notice of Exemption Filing Fee
Notice of Exemption Filing Fee
Professional Services
Professional Services
Rathbun Trail Ribbon Cutting Exp/IEAM Annual Membership/APWA Luncheon Fuel Charges
Fuel Charges 01/19/24 368.63
Check# Vendor/Employee Transaction Amount
City of Big Bear Lake
Expenditure By Department
Checks Issued 12/01/2023 ‐ 01/25/2024
90027 PlanetBids, Inc. Annual Bid Support Service Fee 01/25/24 3,677.90 90033 Willdan Engineering Inc Professional Services 01/25/24 378.00 Engineering Total 32,051.40
Street Maintenance
& Snow Removal 4320
89735 San Bernardino County Solid Waste Mgmt Division Solid Waste Collection 12/07/23 237.35 89738 Bad Bear Sportswear Uniform Expense 12/07/23 67.88 89742 Clifford Fowler Snow Removal Expense 12/07/23 1,747.48 89746 Butchers Blocks
& Building Materials Materials/Supplies 12/07/23 359.40 89747 Bear Valley Printing Inc Drivers Inspection Reports 12/07/23 305.61 89750 Lumber City Corp. Materials/Supplies 12/07/23 43.61 89759 Mission Linen Supply Inc. Uniform Laundry Service 12/07/23 313.81 89773 United Rentals (North America), Inc Snow Removal Expense 12/07/23 34,478.76 89774 US Bank Corporate Payment Systems Fuel Charges/Material & Supplies/Uniforms 12/07/23 798.75
89775 Vulcan Materials Company Inc. Materials/Supplies 12/07/23 3,730.64 89776 Waxie Sanitary Supply Inc. Janitorial Supplies 12/07/23 1,485.17 89782 A Performance Towing Inc Tow Truck Standby 12/14/23 7,500.00 89787 BlackHole Technologies Inc GPS Monthly Service 12/14/23 1,955.77 89788 Butchers Blocks
& Building Materials Materials/Supplies 12/14/23 849.10 89790 Calolympic Glove
& Safety Co Materials/Supplies 12/14/23 387.20
89791 Car Quest Auto Parts Materials/Supplies 12/14/23 314.97 89792 Cintas Corporation First Aid Supplies 12/14/23 177.8489793 Cutting Edge Supply Snow Removal Expense 12/14/23 1,222.59 89797 Inland Kubota, Inc Vehicle Repair Parts 12/14/23 3,335.56 89800 Mission Linen Supply Inc. Uniform Laundry Service 12/14/23 662.61 89801 Municipal Maintenance Equipment Materials/Supplies 12/14/23 75.7589809 United Rentals (North America), Inc Snow Removal Expense 12/14/23 3,093.10 89833 Butchers Blocks
& Building Materials Materials/Supplies 12/22/23 67.28
89835 Charter Communications Holdings, LLC Cable Service 12/22/23 83.51 89839 Extra Space Management Inc Storage Rental Spaces 12/22/23 991.00 89842 Hitchin Lucerne, Inc. Materials/Supplies 12/22/23 1,494.4489845 Mission Linen Supply Inc. Uniform Laundry Service 12/22/23 357.83 89854 Rochester Midland Corporation Janitorial Supplies 12/22/23 152.91 89860 Valero Marketing
& Supply Co Fuel Charges 12/22/23 384.26
89862 Volvo Construction Equipment Inc. Snow Removal Expense 12/22/23 28,284.39 89863 Vulcan Materials Company Inc. Materials/Supplies 12/22/23 1,807.68 89867 Airgas, Inc. Materials/Supplies 12/28/23 2,630.0989877 Lumber City Corp. Materials/Supplies 12/28/23 65.81 89889 Mission Linen Supply Inc. Uniform Laundry Service 12/28/23 592.28 89890 Motive Energy Solar System Maintenance 12/28/23 625.00 89896 ROW Traffic Safety, Inc. Winter Message Boards 12/28/23 7,350.00 89903 Waxie Sanitary Supply Inc. Janitorial Supplies 12/28/23 1,787.75 89904 White Cap L.P. Plate Compactor With Water Tank 12/28/23 5,159.05 89911 US Bank Corporate Payment Systems Office Blinds/Department of Transportation Annual Compliance Fee 01/04/24 266.50 89915 San Bernardino County Vehicle Svcs Dept Fuel Charges 01/11/24 2,511.59 89918 A Performance Towing Inc Tow Truck Standby 01/11/24 7,500.00 89920 BlackHole Technologies Inc GPS Monthly Service 01/11/24 1,969.78 89922 Butchers Blocks
& Building Materials Materials/Supplies 01/11/24 28.82
89925 Cintas Corporation First Aid Supplies 01/11/24 113.22 Check# Vendor/Employee Transaction Amount
City of Big Bear Lake
Expenditure By Department
Checks Issued 12/01/2023 ‐ 01/25/2024
89935 Milspec Industries Inc. Materials/Supplies 01/11/24 212.4089942 Nestle Waters North America Drinking Water 01/11/24 528.31 89944 Staples Business Credit Office Supplies 01/11/24 117.87 89947 Triple Crown Products, Inc. Uniform Expense 01/11/24 197.28 89949 United Rentals (North America), Inc Snow Removal Expense 01/11/24 30,199.10 89950 Vulcan Materials Company Inc. Materials/Supplies 01/11/24 1,611.77 89951 Waxie Sanitary Supply Inc. Janitorial Supplies 01/11/24 15.27 89952 White Cap L.P. Materials/Supplies 01/11/24 5,784.00 89970 San Bernardino County Vehicle Svcs Dept Fuel Charges 01/19/24 3,690.01 89972 Airgas, Inc. Materials/Supplies 01/19/24 292.2489976 Clifford Fowler Snow Removal Expense 01/19/24 8,562.11 89983 Cintas Corporation AED Lease 01/19/24 381.4889990 Genuine Auto Parts Snow Removal Expense 01/19/24 1,474.5389993 Orkin Pest Control Pest Control Service 01/19/24 131.99 89994 ROW Traffic Safety, Inc. Sign Posts 01/19/24 13,043.42 89997 Statewide Traffic Safety and Signs Inc Snow Poles 01/19/24 3,170.46 89999 Twin Bear Equipment Rental, Inc. Materials/Supplies 01/19/24 39.60 90000 United Rentals (North America), Inc Snow Removal Expense 01/19/24 2,417.91 90010 Airgas, Inc. Materials/Supplies 01/25/24 27.6290011 All Valley Environmental Oil Waste Disposal 01/25/24 3,200.0090014 Bear Valley Printing Inc Street Signs 01/25/24 935.54 90019 Grainger Inc. Materials/Supplies 01/25/24 85.91
90020 Haaker Equipment Co. Inc. Materials/Supplies 01/25/24 1,466.88 90024 Mission Linen Supply Inc. Uniform Laundry Service 01/25/24 2,684.15 90028 Rochester Midland Corporation Janitorial Supplies 01/25/24 152.91 90032 Volvo Construction Equipment Inc. Snow Removal Expense 01/25/24 1,644.41 PW: Street Maintenance
& Snow Removal Total 209,433.31
Vehicle Maintenance 4325
89759 Mission Linen Supply Inc. Uniform Laundry Service 12/07/23 39.23 89774 US Bank Corporate Payment Systems Vehicle Repair Parts 12/07/23 1,135.00 89788 Butchers Blocks
& Building Materials Materials/Supplies 12/14/23 7.53
89791 Car Quest Auto Parts Vehicle Repair Parts 12/14/23 2,759.24 89795 Grainger Inc. Vehicle Repair Parts 12/14/23 17.47 89799 Knights Automotive and Performance, Inc. Vehicle Repair Parts 12/14/23 341.60 89800 Mission Linen Supply Inc. Uniform Laundry Service 12/14/23 82.83 89804 Genuine Auto Parts Vehicle Repair Parts 12/14/23 1,143.32 89824 City of Big Bear Lake Dept of Water
& Power Water Usage 12/22/23 207.75
89834 Bear Valley Electric Electricity Usage 12/22/23 35.40 89845 Mission Linen Supply Inc. Uniform Laundry Service 12/22/23 44.75 89889 Mission Linen Supply Inc. Uniform Laundry Service 12/28/23 37.02 89911 US Bank Corporate Payment Systems Vehicle Repair Parts 01/04/24 135.96 89940 Parkhouse Tire, Inc. Tires 01/11/24 2,675.40
89945 Southwest Gas Corporation Natural Gas Usage 01/11/24 2,539.48 89971 City of Big Bear Lake Dept of Water
& Power Water Usage 01/19/24 196.77
89982 Car Quest Auto Parts Vehicle Repair Parts 01/19/24 71.24 89990 Genuine Auto Parts Vehicle Repair Parts 01/19/24 68.84 90024 Mission Linen Supply Inc. Uniform Laundry Service 01/25/24 128.17 PW: Vehicle Maintenance Total 11,667.00
Check# Vendor/Employee Transaction Amount
City of Big Bear Lake
Expenditure By Department
Checks Issued 12/01/2023 ‐ 01/25/2024
Street Lighting 4330
89834 Bear Valley Electric Electricity Usage 12/22/23 8,184.41 89923 Bear Valley Electric Electricity Usage 01/11/24 5,772.61 89979 Bear Valley Electric Electricity Usage 01/19/24 287.64 PW: Street Lighting Total 14,244.66
Parking Lots / Chamber Building 4335
89746 Butchers Blocks
& Building Materials Materials/Supplies 12/07/23 410.38 89776 Waxie Sanitary Supply Inc. Janitorial Supplies 12/07/23 1,485.17 89784 Big Bear Disposal Inc Portable Restroom Rentals 12/14/23 564.82 89788 Butchers Blocks
& Building Materials Materials/Supplies 12/14/23 91.63
89805 Orkin Pest Control Pest Control Service 12/14/23 2,444.99 89824 City of Big Bear Lake Dept of Water
& Power Water Usage 12/22/23 400.33
89829 Big Bear Chamber of Commerce Natural Gas Usage 12/22/23 162.66 89833 Butchers Blocks
& Building Materials Materials/Supplies 12/22/23 21.19
89834 Bear Valley Electric Electricity Usage 12/22/23 5,130.04 89835 Charter Communications Holdings, LLC Security Camera Internet Service 12/22/23 239.96 89854 Rochester Midland Corporation Janitorial Supplies 12/22/23 152.91 89871 Butchers Blocks
& Building Materials Materials/Supplies 12/28/23 19.21
89903 Waxie Sanitary Supply Inc. Janitorial Supplies 12/28/23 1,787.73 89923 Bear Valley Electric Electricity Usage 01/11/24 2,096.66 89929 Lumber City Corp. Materials/Supplies 01/11/24 20.53 89935 Milspec Industries Inc. Materials/Supplies 01/11/24 212.4089951 Waxie Sanitary Supply Inc. Janitorial Supplies 01/11/24 15.27 89971 City of Big Bear Lake Dept of Water
& Power Water Usage 01/19/24 433.27
89979 Bear Valley Electric Electricity Usage 01/19/24 1,075.41 89986 Geiger Supply, Inc. Janitorial Supplies 01/19/24 26.83 89993 Orkin Pest Control Pest Control Service 01/19/24 234.99 90012 Big Bear Disposal Inc Portable Restroom Rentals 01/25/24 564.82 90015 Charter Communications Holdings, LLC Security Camera Internet Service 01/25/24 239.96 90019 Grainger Inc. Materials/Supplies 01/25/24 85.90
90028 Rochester Midland Corporation Janitorial Supplies 01/25/24 152.91 PW: Parking Lots/Chamber Total 18,069.97
Planning 4410
89751 DKS Associates Professional Services 12/07/23 4,200.00 89774 US Bank Corporate Payment Systems Meeting Expense/Business Cards/APA Membership 12/07/23 575.87 89777 Willdan Engineering Inc Professional Services 12/07/23 3,920.00 89803 Mountain Trophy
& Pro Shop Slider Name Plate 12/14/23 25.86
89848 Mountain Trophy
& Pro Shop Slider Name Plate 12/22/23 51.72
89911 US Bank Corporate Payment Systems APA Annual Membership/Office Supplies 01/04/24 999.65 89914 San Bernardino County Monthly Assessor Parcel Map Update 01/11/24 4.00 89930 DKS Associates Professional Services 01/11/24 1,801.21 89941 Quill Corporation Office Supplies 01/11/24 364.55 89984 DKS Associates Professional Services 01/19/24 106.90 90006 San Bernardino County Monthly Assessor Parcel Map Update 01/25/24 2.00 Planning Total 12,051.76
Check# Vendor/Employee Transaction Amount
City of Big Bear Lake
Expenditure By Department
Checks Issued 12/01/2023 ‐ 01/25/2024
Planning Commission 4411
89911 US Bank Corporate Payment Systems Office Supplies 01/04/24 53.81 Planning Commission Total 53.81
Neighborhood Preservation
& Code Compliance 4415
89788 Butchers Blocks
& Building Materials Materials/Supplies 12/14/23 42.54
89877 Lumber City Corp. Materials/Supplies 12/28/23 3.08 89911 US Bank Corporate Payment Systems Meeting Provisions/Office Supplies/CACEO Annual Membership 01/04/24 653.15 89915 San Bernardino County Vehicle Svcs Dept Fuel Charges 01/11/24 1,002.04 89947 Triple Crown Products, Inc. City Logo Apparel 01/11/24 99.38 89970 San Bernardino County Vehicle Svcs Dept Fuel Charges 01/19/24 1,014.08 90014 Bear Valley Printing Inc Vacation Rental Mailers 01/25/24 155.30 Neighborhood Preservation
& Code Compliance Total 2,969.57
Building
& Safety 4430
89905 Willdan Engineering Inc Professional Services 12/28/23 35,546.25 89915 San Bernardino County Vehicle Svcs Dept Fuel Charges 01/11/24 110.18 89970 San Bernardino County Vehicle Svcs Dept Fuel Charges 01/19/24 141.65 90033 Willdan Engineering Inc Professional Services 01/25/24 36,313.75 Building
& Safety Total 72,111.83
PAC Administration 4610
89744 Bravo Arts Solutions LLC Ticket Printing Fees 12/07/23 61.05 89921 Bravo Arts Solutions LLC Ticket Printing Fees 01/11/24 274.45 PAC Administration Total 335.50
City Parks
& Trails 4625
89746 Butchers Blocks
& Building Materials Materials/Supplies 12/07/23 141.93 89755 Grainger Inc. Materials/Supplies 12/07/23 431.75
89774 US Bank Corporate Payment Systems Park Lighting Equipment 12/07/23 2,585.96 89776 Waxie Sanitary Supply Inc. Janitorial Supplies 12/07/23 1,485.17 89788 Butchers Blocks
& Building Materials Materials/Supplies 12/14/23 204.70 89807 Uline Dog Waste System Receptacles 12/14/23 2,358.83 89824 City of Big Bear Lake Dept of Water
& Power Water Usage 12/22/23 1,213.96
89828 All Protection Alarm Alarm Monitoring 12/22/23 96.15 89834 Bear Valley Electric Electricity Usage 12/22/23 3,101.26 89835 Charter Communications Holdings, LLC Security Camera Internet Service 12/22/23 409.94 89841 Geiger Supply, Inc. Materials/Supplies 12/22/23 20.88 89854 Rochester Midland Corporation Janitorial Supplies 12/22/23 152.91 89871 Butchers Blocks
& Building Materials Materials/Supplies 12/28/23 293.22 89873 Bear Valley Printing Inc Signs 12/28/23 39.85
89903 Waxie Sanitary Supply Inc. Janitorial Supplies 12/28/23 1,787.73 89916 City of Big Bear Lake Dept of Water
& Power Water Usage 01/11/24 181.27
89923 Bear Valley Electric Electricity Usage 01/11/24 825.21 89927 Rosemary E De Lap Locksmith Services 01/11/24 1,236.81 89935 Milspec Industries Inc. Materials/Supplies 01/11/24 212.4089951 Waxie Sanitary Supply Inc. Janitorial Supplies 01/11/24 15.27 89971 City of Big Bear Lake Dept of Water
& Power Water Usage 01/19/24 578.85
89979 Bear Valley Electric Electricity Usage 01/19/24 2,619.91 Check# Vendor/Employee Transaction Amount
City of Big Bear Lake
Expenditure By Department
Checks Issued 12/01/2023 ‐ 01/25/2024
90008 City of Big Bear Lake Dept of Water
& Power Water Usage 01/25/24 80.70
90013 Butchers Blocks
& Building Materials Materials/Supplies 01/25/24 25.34
90015 Charter Communications Holdings, LLC Security Camera Internet Service 01/25/24 409.94 90019 Grainger Inc. Materials/Supplies 01/25/24 85.91
90028 Rochester Midland Corporation Janitorial Supplies 01/25/24 152.91 ACH S Porter Inc Labor Services 12/07/23 3,040.00
ACH S Porter Inc Labor Services 12/28/23 4,160.00
ACH S Porter Inc Labor Services 01/19/24 8,160.00
ACH S Porter Inc Labor Services 01/25/24 3,000.00
City Parks
& Trails Total 39,108.76
General Government 4800
89748 Cintas Corporation First Aid Supplies 12/07/23 216.5789761 Mountain Water Co Water Dispenser Rental & Water 12/07/23 120.00
89774 US Bank Corporate Payment Systems Postage/Website Membership Credit 12/07/23 ‐65.47 89781 San Bernardino County Transportation Authority General Assessment Annual Dues 12/14/23 11,870.00 89847 Randy Spitz Meeting Supplies 12/22/23 41.0089891 Mountain Trophy & Pro Shop Slider Name Plates 12/28/23 71.12
89911 US Bank Corporate Payment Systems Goldsmith Sympathy Donations/Office Supplies 01/04/24 160.92 89938 Mountain Water Co Water Dispenser Rental
& Water 01/11/24 128.00
89941 Quill Corporation Office Supplies 01/11/24 24.33
89988 Randy Spitz Meeting Supplies 01/19/24 41.0089989 Mountain Trophy & Pro Shop Slider Name Plates 01/19/24 90.51
General Government Total 12,697.98
Information Technology 4810
89753 Fisher Integrated, Inc. Video Streaming 12/07/23 1,200.0089757 Intelesys One, Inc. IT Services/License Fees/Support/Phishing Training 12/07/23 12,234.28 89774 US Bank Corporate Payment Systems Monthly Subscriptions/Computer Equipment/Printer 12/07/23 1,377.41 89798 Intelesys One, Inc. Computer Equipment 12/14/23 9,903.16 89835 Charter Communications Holdings, LLC High Speed Internet 12/22/23 2,457.19 89840 Frontier Communications Telephone Service 12/22/23 1,921.73 89853 Ring Central Communication Services 12/22/23 2,602.55 89861 Verizon Wireless Cell Phone Service 12/22/23 1,347.97 89874 Charter Communications Holdings, LLC Circuit
& RingCentral Installation Services 12/28/23 1,422.05
89884 Intelesys One, Inc. Computer Equipment 12/28/23 9,326.06 89885 MTS Partners Inc Toner 12/28/23 124.99
89911 US Bank Corporate Payment Systems Computer Equipment/Monthly Subscriptions 01/04/24 1,450.34 89932 Frontier Communications Telephone Service 01/11/24 77.22 89933 MTS Partners Inc Toner 01/11/24 538.77
89978 Burtronics Business Systems Copier Charges 01/19/24 37.64 89985 Frontier Communications Telephone Service 01/19/24 1,925.33 89987 MTS Partners Inc Toner 01/19/24 105.60
90015 Charter Communications Holdings, LLC High Speed Internet 01/25/24 2,460.06 90021 Harris Computer Systems Annual Software Subscription 01/25/24 6,522.51 Technology Services Total 57,034.86
Civic Center 4820
89739 Bay City Equipment Industries Inc Maintenance
& Repairs 12/07/23 4,581.83
Check# Vendor/Employee Transaction Amount
City of Big Bear Lake
Expenditure By Department
Checks Issued 12/01/2023 ‐ 01/25/2024
89746 Butchers Blocks
& Building Materials Materials/Supplies 12/07/23 108.53 89748 Cintas Corporation AED Lease 12/07/23 381.44
89750 Lumber City Corp. Materials/Supplies 12/07/23 161.44 89759 Mission Linen Supply Inc. Uniform Laundry Service 12/07/23 54.92 89760 Michael Marcotte Maintenance
& Repairs 12/07/23 145.00
89774 US Bank Corporate Payment Systems Heater Filter Replacements 12/07/23 98.55 89776 Waxie Sanitary Supply Inc. Janitorial Supplies 12/07/23 1,485.16 89783 Bay City Equipment Industries Inc Maintenance
& Repairs 12/14/23 2,242.86
89788 Butchers Blocks
& Building Materials Materials/Supplies 12/14/23 204.51 89800 Mission Linen Supply Inc. Uniform Laundry Service 12/14/23 115.96 89802 Motive Energy Solar System Maintenance 12/14/23 1,865.98 89805 Orkin Pest Control Pest Control Service 12/14/23 196.99 89824 City of Big Bear Lake Dept of Water
& Power Water Usage 12/22/23 384.78
89828 All Protection Alarm Alarm Monitoring 12/22/23 1,597.71 89834 Bear Valley Electric Electricity Usage 12/22/23 5,595.47 89835 Charter Communications Holdings, LLC Security Camera Internet Service 12/22/23 119.98 89837 Lumber City Corp. Materials/Supplies 12/22/23 15.49 89845 Mission Linen Supply Inc. Uniform Laundry Service 12/22/23 62.62 89846 Michael Marcotte Maintenance
& Repairs 12/22/23 1,669.00
89850 Gold Arc Inc. Maintenance
& Repairs 12/22/23 440.00
89854 Rochester Midland Corporation Janitorial Supplies 12/22/23 152.91 89877 Lumber City Corp. Materials/Supplies 12/28/23 7.75 89889 Mission Linen Supply Inc. Uniform Laundry Service 12/28/23 51.83 89890 Motive Energy Solar System Maintenance 12/28/23 3,205.00 89903 Waxie Sanitary Supply Inc. Janitorial Supplies 12/28/23 1,787.74 89911 US Bank Corporate Payment Systems Office Supplies 01/04/24 53.76 89915 San Bernardino County Vehicle Svcs Dept Fuel Charges 01/11/24 3,730.85 89923 Bear Valley Electric Electricity Usage 01/11/24 728.59 89925 Cintas Corporation AED Lease 01/11/24 381.4489929 Lumber City Corp. Materials/Supplies 01/11/24 54.27 89935 Milspec Industries Inc. Materials/Supplies 01/11/24 212.4089945 Southwest Gas Corporation Natural Gas Usage 01/11/24 7,389.41 89951 Waxie Sanitary Supply Inc. Janitorial Supplies 01/11/24 15.27 89970 San Bernardino County Vehicle Svcs Dept Fuel Charges 01/19/24 3,530.64 89971 City of Big Bear Lake Dept of Water
& Power Water Usage 01/19/24 392.10
89975 Big Bear Paint Center Materials/Supplies 01/19/24 27.47 90013 Butchers Blocks
& Building Materials Materials/Supplies 01/25/24 17.07
90015 Charter Communications Holdings, LLC Security Camera Internet Service 01/25/24 119.98 90016 Lumber City Corp. Materials/Supplies 01/25/24 33.32 90019 Grainger Inc. Materials/Supplies 01/25/24 479.95
90024 Mission Linen Supply Inc. Uniform Laundry Service 01/25/24 179.42 90026 Motive Energy Solar System Maintenance 01/25/24 410.00 90028 Rochester Midland Corporation Janitorial Supplies 01/25/24 152.91 Civic Center Total 44,642.30
PAC Operations
& Maintenance 4821
89828 All Protection Alarm Alarm Monitoring 12/22/23 304.41 89834 Bear Valley Electric Electricity Usage 12/22/23 1,865.16 89923 Bear Valley Electric Electricity Usage 01/11/24 242.87 Check# Vendor/Employee Transaction Amount
City of Big Bear Lake
Expenditure By Department
Checks Issued 12/01/2023 ‐ 01/25/2024
89943 SESAC Music License Fee 01/11/24 290.50
89945 Southwest Gas Corporation Natural Gas Usage 01/11/24 2,185.41 ACH Gary Payne Theatre Maintenance & Support 12/14/23 550.00 ACH Gary Payne Theatre Maintenance & Support 12/22/23 550.00ACH What's Up Big Bear Theatre Support 12/22/23 360.00 PAC Operations & Maintenance Total 6,348.35
Sanitation 250
89746 Butchers Blocks & Building Materials Materials/Supplies 12/07/23 40.28 89750 Lumber City Corp. Materials/Supplies 12/07/23 38.43 89758 Merrell Johnson Engineering Inc Professional Services 12/07/23 1,147.00 89759 Mission Linen Supply Inc. Uniform Laundry Service 12/07/23 313.81 89762 Genuine Auto Parts Materials/Supplies 12/07/23 16.15 89774 US Bank Corporate Payment Systems Uniform Expense 12/07/23 263.90 89790 Calolympic Glove & Safety Co Materials/Supplies 12/14/23 387.19 89791 Car Quest Auto Parts Vehicle Repair Parts 12/14/23 121.73 89792 Cintas Corporation First Aid Supplies 12/14/23 177.84 89794 Golden Bell Products, Inc Materials/Supplies 12/14/23 3,499.08 89796 Haaker Equipment Co. Inc. Materials/Supplies 12/14/23 346.22 89800 Mission Linen Supply Inc. Uniform Laundry Service 12/14/23 1,550.47 89804 Genuine Auto Parts Vehicle Repair Parts 12/14/23 59.50 89808 Underground Service Alert Inc. Underground Dig Alert Services 12/14/23 199.93 89824 City of Big Bear Lake Dept of Water & Power Water Usage 12/22/23 50.70 89827 BBARWA Semi‐Annual Sewer Charges 12/22/23 1,841,659.14 89834 Bear Valley Electric Electricity Usage 12/22/23 6,769.82 89840 Frontier Communications Telephone Service 12/22/23 794.82 89842 Hitchin Lucerne, Inc. Materials/Supplies 12/22/23 1,494.4489844 Merrell Johnson Engineering Inc Professional Services 12/22/23 1,193.25 89845 Mission Linen Supply Inc. Uniform Laundry Service 12/22/23 488.61 89871 Butchers Blocks & Building Materials Materials/Supplies 12/28/23 18.31 89877 Lumber City Corp. Materials/Supplies 12/28/23 20.3589878 Grainger Inc. Materials/Supplies 12/28/23 460.40 89880 Haaker Equipment Co. Inc. Repair Parts 12/28/23 146.50 89883 Industrial Specialty Products Materials/Supplies 12/28/23 391.86 89886 Lance Soll & Lunghard Professional Services 12/28/23 464.10 89889 Mission Linen Supply Inc. Uniform Laundry Service 12/28/23 130.78 89893 Genuine Auto Parts Vehicle Repair Parts 12/28/23 199.11 89901 Underground Service Alert Inc. Underground Dig Alert Services 12/28/23 259.43 89911 US Bank Corporate Payment Systems CWEA Annual Membership/Department of Transportation Annual Compliance Fee 01/04/24 320.50 89915 San Bernardino County Vehicle Svcs Dept Fuel Charges 01/11/24 3,081.12 89917 South Coast AQMD Permit Fees 01/11/24 665.26
89922 Butchers Blocks & Building Materials Materials/Supplies 01/11/24 12.81 89923 Bear Valley Electric Electricity Usage 01/11/24 1,080.25 89925 Cintas Corporation First Aid Supplies 01/11/24 113.21 89932 Frontier Communications Telephone Service 01/11/24 114.30 89935 Milspec Industries Inc. Materials/Supplies 01/11/24 212.41 89936 Mission Linen Supply Inc. Uniform Laundry Service 01/11/24 130.78 89942 Nestle Waters North America Drinking Water 01/11/24 528.32 89944 Staples Business Credit Office Supplies 01/11/24 117.88 Check# Vendor/Employee Transaction Amount
City of Big Bear Lake
Expenditure By Department
Checks Issued 12/01/2023 ‐ 01/25/2024
89945 Southwest Gas Corporation Natural Gas Usage 01/11/24 2,539.46 89948 Underground Service Alert Inc. Underground Dig Alert Services 01/11/24 177.18 89968 California State Water Resources Control Board Regulatory Coverage Enrollment Application 01/19/24 3,746.00 89970 San Bernardino County Vehicle Svcs Dept Fuel Charges 01/19/24 2,495.10 89971 City of Big Bear Lake Dept of Water
& Power Water Usage 01/19/24 50.70
89979 Bear Valley Electric Electricity Usage 01/19/24 5,268.88 89982 Car Quest Auto Parts Vehicle Repair Parts 01/19/24 691.96 89983 Cintas Corporation AED Lease 01/19/24 381.4289985 Frontier Communications Telephone Service 01/19/24 595.63 89990 Genuine Auto Parts Vehicle Repair Parts 01/19/24 158.89 90002 White Cap L.P. Portable Generator 01/19/24 5,320.81 90013 Butchers Blocks
& Building Materials Materials/Supplies 01/25/24 27.86
90016 Lumber City Corp. Materials/Supplies 01/25/24 222.86 90024 Mission Linen Supply Inc. Uniform Laundry Service 01/25/24 460.02 Sanitation Total 1,891,216.76
Property Lease General Operations 255
89743 Birtcher Anderson
& Davis Assoc Inc. Improvement Plan Feasibility Study 12/07/23 9,167.00 89770 SWA Group Inc. Park Concept Plan Development 12/07/23 2,500.00 89833 Butchers Blocks
& Building Materials Materials/Supplies 12/22/23 13.73
89888 Mile High Equipment, Inc. Demolition Services 12/28/23 3,465.00 89894 Nativescapes, Inc. Tree Inspection Services 12/28/23 200.00 89900 SWA Group Inc. Park Concept Plan Development 12/28/23 9,813.02 89931 Everfence Corporation Chain Link Fence Installation 01/11/24 65,884.50 89981 Bear Valley Tree Care, Inc. Tree Removal Services 01/19/24 1,068.75 89998 Tripepi, Smith
& Associates, Inc. Professional Services 01/19/24 3,890.00 90030 SWA Group Inc. Park Concept Plan Development 01/25/24 3,375.10 Property Lease General Operations Total 99,377.10
Mountain Transit 4362
89825 Mountain Area Regional Transit Authority No‐Fare Trolley Contribution ‐ November & December 12/22/23 83,333.34
89910 Mountain Area Regional Transit Authority No‐Fare Trolley Contribution ‐ January 01/04/24 41,666.67 Mountain Transit Total 125,000.01
Village Streetscape Maintenance 291
89746 Butchers Blocks
& Building Materials Materials/Supplies 12/07/23 32.88
89774 US Bank Corporate Payment Systems Holiday Lighting 12/07/23 14,623.83 89788 Butchers Blocks
& Building Materials Materials/Supplies 12/14/23 121.57 89795 Grainger Inc. Materials/Supplies 12/14/23 187.27
89824 City of Big Bear Lake Dept of Water
& Power Water Usage 12/22/23 261.14
89830 Big Bear Disposal Inc Village Litter Containers 12/22/23 4,507.40 89834 Bear Valley Electric Electricity Usage 12/22/23 2,460.33 89859 United Rentals (North America), Inc Equipment Rental 12/22/23 4,348.80 89871 Butchers Blocks
& Building Materials Materials/Supplies 12/28/23 28.00
89902 United Rentals (North America), Inc Equipment Rental 12/28/23 2,174.40 89919 Big Bear Disposal Inc Village Litter Containers 01/11/24 2,253.70 89922 Butchers Blocks
& Building Materials Materials/Supplies 01/11/24 56.85
89923 Bear Valley Electric Electricity Usage 01/11/24 935.53 89929 Lumber City Corp. Materials/Supplies 01/11/24 1,503.10 Check# Vendor/Employee Transaction Amount
City of Big Bear Lake
Expenditure By Department
Checks Issued 12/01/2023 ‐ 01/25/2024
89945 Southwest Gas Corporation Natural Gas Usage 01/11/24 2,890.61 89949 United Rentals (North America), Inc Equipment Rental 01/11/24 30.65 89971 City of Big Bear Lake Dept of Water
& Power Water Usage 01/19/24 261.14
89979 Bear Valley Electric Electricity Usage 01/19/24 1,794.80 89999 Twin Bear Equipment Rental, Inc. Equipment Rental 01/19/24 101.30 90000 United Rentals (North America), Inc Equipment Rental 01/19/24 2,174.40 Village Streetscape Maintenance Total 40,747.70
Capital Projects 321
89754 Gibson Transportation Consulting, Inc. Castle Rock Trailhead Project 12/07/23 3,533.75 89758 Merrell Johnson Engineering Inc Rathbun Creek Trail Project 12/07/23 7,927.0089758 Merrell Johnson Engineering Inc Cottage Lane Sewer Replacement 12/07/23 495.00 89765 RDO Equipment Co Equipment Acquisitions/Replacements 12/07/23 28,386.03 89766 ROW Traffic Safety, Inc. Stanfield SMORE Project 12/07/23 278.26 89768 Sancon Technologies, Inc. Sanitary Sewer Cured‐in‐Place Pipe Project (CIPP) 12/07/23 81,008.88 89769 Southern California Mountains Foundation Stanfield SMORE Project/Ca4All Youth Workforce Project 12/07/23 222,875.20 89771 Tom Dodson
& Associates Castle Rock Trailhead Project 12/07/23 600.00 89772 Alexandro Torres Raise Sewer Manholes ‐ Retention Released 12/07/23 4,256.60 89785 Big Bear Electric Sanitation Infrastructure 12/14/23 29,182.76 89806 Romans Construction Corp. Stanfield Parking Lot Project ‐ Retention Release 12/14/23 18,739.33 89838 Final Touch Construction
& Design Inc. City Hall Roof Restoration Project 12/22/23 91,256.93 89844 Merrell Johnson Engineering Inc Rathbun Creek Trail Project 12/22/23 2,704.0089898 Romans Construction Corp. Cottage Lane Sewer Replacement 12/28/23 139,487.55 89971 City of Big Bear Lake Dept of Water
& Power Rathbun Creek Trail Project 01/19/24 2,907.00
90031 Tom Dodson
& Associates Castle Rock Trailhead Project 01/25/24 525.00 ACH S Porter Inc Rathbun Creek Trail Project 12/22/23 54,321.00 Capital Projects Total 688,484.29
Street Improvement Projects 350
89745 Peter Joseph Bucknam Street Sign Inventory Project 12/07/23 6,169.00 89758 Merrell Johnson Engineering Inc Annual Street Rehabilitation Project 12/07/23 3,906.00 89775 Vulcan Materials Company Inc. Street/Drainage Improvements 12/07/23 75,669.44 89870 Peter Joseph Bucknam Street Sign Inventory Project 12/28/23 5,576.00 89872 Bear Valley Paving, Inc. Street/Drainage Improvements 12/28/23 10,125.00ACH S Porter Inc Moonridge Corridor Project 12/14/23 2,500.00 ACH S Porter Inc Annual Street Rehabilitation Project 12/22/23 54,404.65 ACH S Porter Inc Annual Street Rehabilitation Project/Moonridge Corridor Project 12/28/23 78,868.00 Capital Projects/ Street Improvements Total 237,218.09
Refuse 550
89734 California State Water Resources Control Board Annual Permit Fee 12/07/23 7,067.00 89735 San Bernardino County Solid Waste Mgmt Division Solid Waste Removal 12/07/23 349.26 89758 Merrell Johnson Engineering Inc Professional Services 12/07/23 1,767.00 89759 Mission Linen Supply Inc. Uniform Laundry Service 12/07/23 62.76 89784 Big Bear Disposal Inc Rental Toilets 12/14/23 79.28 89800 Mission Linen Supply Inc. Uniform Laundry Service 12/14/23 132.52 89830 Big Bear Disposal Inc Residential Curb/Bin Service (Nov‐Dec)/Mulch Buy‐Back 12/22/23 526,959.24 89843 Lynn Merrill And Associates, Inc. Professional Services 12/22/23 924.10 89844 Merrell Johnson Engineering Inc Professional Services 12/22/23 2,801.75 Check# Vendor/Employee Transaction Amount
City of Big Bear Lake
Expenditure By Department
Checks Issued 12/01/2023 ‐ 01/25/2024
89845 Mission Linen Supply Inc. Uniform Laundry Service 12/22/23 71.56 89886 Lance Soll
& Lunghard Professional Services 12/28/23 464.10
89889 Mission Linen Supply Inc. Uniform Laundry Service 12/28/23 59.23 89919 Big Bear Disposal Inc Residential Curb/Bin Service 01/11/24 259,532.87 89980 Bear Valley Printing Inc Materials/Supplies 01/19/24 372.8289996 Storm Water Innovative Solutions Inc Environmental Catch Basin Filter Installations 01/19/24 10,500.00 90007 San Bernardino County Fire Protection District Household Hazardous Waste Removal 01/25/24 5,527.00 90012 Big Bear Disposal Inc Rental Toilets 01/25/24 101.01 90024 Mission Linen Supply Inc. Uniform Laundry Service 01/25/24 205.05 90025 Mojave Desert
& Mountain Membership Contributions 01/25/24 3,959.00
Refuse Total 820,935.55
5,559,464.91
DISTRIBUTION OF TREASURY CASH Rate Amount % of Total
Demand Account - Union Bank $ 4,478,286 17.20%
Imprest Cash - Union Bank Payroll $ 5,342 0.02%
Imprest Cash $ 1,500 0.01%
Dental Self Insured Checking $ 164,041 0.63%
Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) 3.843% 21,386,795 $ 82.14% Total Cash In Treasury: $ 26,035,964 100.00%
INVESTMENT ACTIVITY Days Deposits Withdrawals
LAIF Average Life (Days) of Portfolio 256
LAIF Transactions $775,000 $1,050,000
Interest Received for Fiscal Year 2023-24 $222,344
DISTRIBUTION OF CASH BY FUND November October 2023 Change General $ 20,747,909 $ 20,340,947 $ 406,962
Sanitation $ 5,715,615 $ 4,610,027 $ 1,105,588
Capital Improvement $ (1,713,826) $ (491,409) $ (1,222,417) Refuse $ 538,942 $ 22,199 $ 516,743
Trust $ 170,756 $ 643,283 $ (472,527)
Successor Agency $ 114,724 $ 114,724 $ -
AB 3229 Supp Law Enforce $ 461,844 $ 428,238 $ 33,606
Total Cash in Treasury: $ 26,035,964 $ 25,668,009 $ 367,955 CASH WITH FISCAL AGENT - RESERVE FUNDS Cost Basis Market Value Current Yield 2005 Revenue Refunding Bonds
Big Bear Lake Reserve Fund $ 588,208 $ 588,208 5.27%
Moonridge Reserve Fund $ 83,782 $ 83,782 5.27%
1999 IA Tax Allocation Bonds $ 289,289 $ 289,289 5.27%
- The aforementioned investments conform to the City's investment policy. (Res. 2022-64) - Cash is sufficient to meet needs of the next 6 months. - Interest earned on invested cash is accrued on a quarterly basis.

Pursuant to California Government Code 53647 all local government agencies are required to report the current market value of investments under management by an outside party. The reserve funds for the aforementioned bond issues are held and managed by the City's Trustee, Union Bank.

CITY OF BIG BEAR LAKE

TREASURER'S REPORT
November 30, 2023
DISTRIBUTION OF TREASURY CASH Rate Amount % of Total
Demand Account - Union Bank $ 4,428,196 15.07%
Imprest Cash - Union Bank Payroll $ 5,342 0.02%
Imprest Cash $ 1,500 0.01%
Dental Self Insured Checking $ 162,045 0.55%
Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) 3.929% 24,786,795 $ 84.36% Total Cash In Treasury: $ 29,383,878 100.00%
INVESTMENT ACTIVITY Days Deposits Withdrawals
LAIF Average Life (Days) of Portfolio 256
LAIF Transactions $5,700,000 $2,300,000
Interest Received for Fiscal Year 2023-24 $222,344
DISTRIBUTION OF CASH BY FUND December 2023 November 2023 Change General $ 21,349,642 $ 20,747,909 $ 601,733
Sanitation $ 5,761,436 $ 5,715,615 $ 45,821
Capital Improvement $ (525,539) $ (1,713,826) $ 1,188,287 Refuse $ 1,528,856 $ 538,942 $ 989,914
Trust $ 475,815 $ 170,756 $ 305,059
Successor Agency $ 307,826 $ 114,724 $ 193,102
AB 3229 Supp Law Enforce $ 485,842 $ 461,844 $ 23,998
Total Cash in Treasury: $ 29,383,878 $ 26,035,964 $ 3,347,914 CASH WITH FISCAL AGENT - RESERVE FUNDS Cost Basis Market Value Current Yield 2005 Revenue Refunding Bonds
Big Bear Lake Reserve Fund $ 590,743 $ 590,743 5.26%
Moonridge Reserve Fund $ 84,143 $ 84,143 5.26%
1999 IA Tax Allocation Bonds $ 289,289 $ 289,289 5.26%
- The aforementioned investments conform to the City's investment policy. (Res. 2022-64) - Cash is sufficient to meet needs of the next 6 months. - Interest earned on invested cash is accrued on a quarterly basis.

CITY OF BIG BEAR LAKE

TREASURER'S REPORT
December 31, 2023

MEETING
DATE: February 14, 2024
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
THROUGH: Erik Sund, City Manager
FROM: Erica Stephenson, Assistant City Manager/City Clerk SUBJECT: Resolution Authorizing a Delegate for the Mojave Desert Mountain Integrated Waste Joint Powers Authority

BACKGROUND & DISCUSSION
On December 18, 1991, the City adopted Resolution No. 91-93 establishing the City as a member of the Mojave Desert Mountain Integrated Waste Joint Powers Authority (JPA), for the purpose of creating a Solid Waste Management Authority. That same resolution also directs that a City delegate and alternate to the JPA Board of Directors be appointed by resolution each year. During the Mayor’s 2024 board/committee selection process, Mayor Melnick appointed Mayor Pro Tem Segovia as the City’s JPA delegate and Councilmember Mote as the alternate. In the upcoming year, Mayor Pro Tem Segovia will serve on the JPA Board of Directors, which will meet quarterly in an effort to develop programs and facilities that will ensure our region’s compliance with state integrated waste management laws.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with the adoption of this resolution.

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS
None requiring review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

CONSIDERATION OF STRATEGIC PRIORITIES
This item aligns with the City Council’s Strategic Priorities as it aids in the enhancement of local advocacy strategies and bolsters partnerships with regional partners.

RECOMMENDED ACTION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution confirming the Mayor’s appointment of Mayor Pro Tem Segovia as the City’s delegate and Councilmember Mote as the City’s alternate to the Mojave Desert Mountain Integrated Waste Joint Powers Authority Board of Directors.

ATTACHMENT

1. Resolution No. 2024-XX
Item 1.2
RESOLUTION NO. 2024-XX

RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING A DELEGATE FOR THE MOJAVE DESERT

MOUNTAIN INTEGRATED WASTE JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY
WHEREAS, on December 18, 1991, City Council adopted Resolution No. 91-83 establishing the City as a member of the Mojave Desert Mountain Integrated Waste Joint Powers Authority (JPA); and
WHEREAS, Resolution No. 91-93 directs that a City delegate and alternate be appointed each year by resolution; and
WHEREAS, during the Mayor’s 2024 board/committee selection process, Mayor Melnick appointed Mayor Pro Tem Segovia as the City’s JPA delegate and Councilmember Mote as the City’s JPA alternate; and
WHEREAS, on February 14, 2024, Mayor Pro Tem Segovia and Councilmember Mote were publicly named, respectively, as the delegate and the alternate to the Mojave Desert Mountain Integrated Waste Joint Powers Authority.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Big Bear Lake does approve the appointment of Mayor Pro Tem Segovia as the delegate, and Councilmember Mote as the alternate to the Mojave Desert Mountain Integrated Waste Joint Powers Authority.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of February, 2024.

Perri Melnick, Mayor
ATTEST:

Erica Stephenson, City Clerk
Item 1.2
Attachment 1

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) ss

CITY OF BIG BEAR LAKE )
I, Erica Stephenson, City Clerk of the City of Big Bear Lake, California, do hereby certify that the whole number of the City Council of the said City is five; that the foregoing resolution, being Resolution No. 2024-XX was duly passed and adopted by the said City Council and attested by the City Clerk of said City, all at a regular meeting of the said City held on the 14th day of February, 2024 and that the same was so passed and adopted by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

Erica Stephenson, City Clerk

MEETING
DATE: February 14, 2024
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
THROUGH: Erik Sund, City Manager
FROM: Erica Stephenson, Assistant City Manager/City Clerk SUBJECT: Resolution Authorizing a Delegate for the County of San Bernardino Solid Waste Advisory Task Force

BACKGROUND & DISCUSSION
The County of San Bernardino Solid Waste Advisory Task Force (SWAT) was formed in 1990, as required by the California Integrated Waste Management Act, to carry out responsibilities mandated through Assembly Bill (AB) 939. SWAT’s purpose is to assist in coordinating the development of the County/City source reduction programs, recycling elements, and to ensure a coordinated and cost-effective regional recycling system. With respect to ensuring a coordinated and cost-effective regional recycling system, the task force works together on all of the following items: 1) identifies solid waste management issues of county-wide or regional concern, 2) determines the need for solid waste collection systems, processing facilities, and marketing strategies that can serve more than one local jurisdiction within the region, 3) facilitates the development of multijurisdictional arrangements for the marketing of recyclable materials, and 4) to the extent possible, facilitates resolution of conflicts and inconsistencies between or among City source reduction programs and recycling elements.

The SWAT roster is comprised of elected officials from incorporated cities in San Bernardino County, as well as representatives from the County and some at-large public members. The task force meets on a bi-annual basis and additionally as needed. Elected officials serve as delegates and as alternates if need be. During this year’s Mayoral board/committee selection process, Mayor Melnick appointed Mayor Pro Tem Segovia to serve as the City’s SWAT delegate, and she selected Councilmember Mote to serve as the alternate.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with the adoption of this resolution.

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS
None requiring review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

Item 1.3

RECOMMENDED ACTION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution confirming the Mayor’s appointment of Mayor Pro Tem Segovia as the City’s delegate and Councilmember Mote as the City’s alternate for the County of San Bernardino Solid Waste Advisory Task Force.

ATTACHMENT

1. Resolution No. 2024-XX
RESOLUTION NO. 2024-XX

RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING A DELEGATE FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN

BERNARDINO SOLID WASTE ADVISORY TASK FORCE
WHEREAS, the County of San Bernardino Solid Waste Advisory Task Force (SWAT) was formed in 1990 to carry out the responsibilities mandated by the State of California through AB 939; and
WHEREAS, SWAT’s purpose is to assist in coordinating the development of the County/City source reduction programs, recycling elements, and to ensure a coordinated and cost effective regional recycling system; and
WHEREAS, the SWAT roster is comprised of elected officials from incorporated cities in San Bernardino County, as well as representatives from the County and some at-large public members; and
WHEREAS, on February 14, 2024, Mayor Pro Tem Segovia and Councilmember Mote were named, respectively, by Mayor Melnick as the City’s 2024 SWAT delegate and alternate.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Big Bear Lake does approve the appointment of Mayor Pro Tem Segovia as the delegate, and Councilmember Mote as the alternate to the County of San Bernardino Solid Waste Advisory Task Force.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of February, 2024.

Perri Melnick, Mayor
ATTEST:

Erica Stephenson, City Clerk
Item 1.3
Attachment 1

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) ss

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

Erica Stephenson, City Clerk

BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION
In 2021, the City was awarded grant funds from the State of California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) to develop a Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP). The purpose of an LRSP is to identify local roadway safety needs and to provide the City with a framework and opportunity for resolving unique local roadway safety needs within the City’s jurisdiction. To further these efforts, the adoption of an LRSP satisfies the City’s eligibility for future Caltrans administered grant opportunities such as the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) and Safe Streets and Roads for All (SS4A) that are aimed toward improving roadway safety.

On June 29, 2022, City Council awarded a professional services agreement to Minagar and Associates in an amount not to exceed $39,893.00 for preparation of the City’s LRSP. Staff engaged Minagar and Associates to begin developing the safety plan with the intent to identify, prioritize, and analyze potential safety improvements on City roadways and intersections. The LRSP covers the following components: safety partner and community outreach, existing planning efforts, collision analysis, emphasis areas, countermeasures, safety projects, implementation recommendations, and cost estimates for emphasis areas.

Generally, an LRSP will identify the ten (10) most impacted intersections and roadway segments, within a local jurisdiction, based upon historic accident data. For the purposes of this report, the consultant utilized accident data from the period January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2021. The data that is utilized in these reviews is generated from the Statewide Integrated Traffic Records Service (SWITRS) which is a database that captures all traffic collision data that is supported by an accident report that was completed and filed by law enforcement.

In reviewing this accident data, it was determined that a number of the impacted intersections involved portions of the State Highway, Big Bear Boulevard, for which the City has no jurisdiction or design responsibility. Staff, in discussion with the consultant, opted to expand the report to review twenty (20) intersections, including the ten (10) most impacted local (City) intersections as well as the ten (10) most impacted intersections under Caltrans jurisdiction. Staff’s thought process is that by identifying locations of concern, even that are within Caltrans jurisdiction, could provide the opportunity for collaboration between the City and Caltrans to address traffic safety concerns Item 1.4
within the City. The report also identifies ten (10) roadway segments, utilizing the same criteria, for improvement within the City under both the City and State jurisdictions.

The report, as presented, identifies the impacted locations utilizing the criteria outlined above. The report provides a synopsis of the safety concerns at the locations, supported by the available data, an overview of the configuration of the intersection or roadway segment, as well as proposed mitigation measures. The mitigation measures are supported by the engineering recommendations of the consultant and provide an estimate of probable construction costs. Finally, this data is used to develop a cost benefit analysis for each location, which would be required should the City pursue grant funding for any of these improvements. The safety measures identified focus primarily on signage, striping, and other traffic safety elements. The plan does not contemplate any significant undertakings such as intersection or roadway realignments or other elements of major civil construction.

The twenty (20) highest collision intersections identified within this report include:

City Intersections (Number of Collisions) State/Caltrans Intersections(Number of Collisions)
Lahontan Drive & Mountainaire Lane (3) Big Bear Boulevard & Sandalwood Drive (8) Moonridge Road & Elm Street (3) Big Bear Boulevard & Summit Boulevard (8) Starvation Flats Road & Fox Farm Road (2) Big Bear Boulevard & Lakeview Drive (8) Tehama Drive & Moonridge Road (2) Big Bear Boulevard & Thrush Drive (6) Moonridge Road & Brownie Lane (2) Big Bear Boulevard & Stanfield Cutoff (5) Village Drive & Pine Knot Avenue (2) Big Bear Boulevard & Georgia Street (4) Pedder Road & Pine Knot Avenue (2) Big Bear Boulevard & Fox Farm Road (4) Brownie Lane & Thrush Drive (2) Big Bear Boulevard & Division Drive (4) Crestwood Drive & Evergreen Drive (2) Big Bear Boulevard & Cienega Road (4) Menlo Drive & Butte Avenue (1) Big Bear Boulevard & Knight Avenue (3) The ten (10) highest collision roadway segments identified within this report include:

Roadway Segment Between (Number of Collisions)
Big Bear Boulevard Stanfield Cutoff to Division Drive (17) Big Bear Boulevard Sandalwood Drive to Starvation Flats Road (9) Big Bear Boulevard Fox Farm Road to Lakeview Center (7) Big Bear Boulevard Moonridge Way to Catalina Road (5)
Big Bear Boulevard Spruce Road to Spruce Spur (3)
Moonridge Road Brownie Lane to Evergreen Road (3)
Big Bear Boulevard Knickerbocker Road to Alden Road (3) Big Bear Boulevard Wren Drive to Crane Drive (3)
Village Drive Cottage Lane to Bartlett Road (2)
Colusa Drive Colusa Way to Colusa Lane (2)
After the draft LRSP was issued, City staff engaged with local safety partners to collaborate on the findings, so that all potential safety concerns were incorporated. Key stakeholders included members of: Caltrans District 8, Bear Valley Unified School District, Big Bear Lake Chamber of Commerce, San Bernardino Sheriff’s Department, and Big Bear Fire. Stakeholders were provided the draft LRSP and a meeting was held with Minagar and Associates so that any questions, or concerns could be addressed. There were no substantial comments or concerns related to the draft LRSP and it was deemed ready to be adopted by City Council.

The data compiled and findings presented within the LRSP will be used as a guide for future capital improvement projects, and if the plan is adopted as presented, City staff will be creating a work plan to address the high-risk local roadway areas to increase safety citywide. The adoption of the plan will also allow the City to be eligible to pursue future grant opportunities that are overseen by Caltrans with the goal of improving safety across the roadways.

It is understood that this plan and report is not comprehensive of traffic safety concerns within the City limits but it does satisfy the criteria for a report of this nature. The report has been prepared in accordance with the specifications and guidelines provided by the Federal Highway Administration and the California Department of Transportation.

FISCAL IMPACT
The City was awarded $40,000 from Caltrans for the development of a LRSP. As part of the grant requirements, the City is responsible for matching $10,000. There is no other direct fiscal impact on the adoption of the LRSP, however adoption of the LRSP allows the City to be eligible for future grant opportunities administered by Caltrans. The total implementation cost provided within the LRSP is approximately $200,000. Staff will review the plan and consider proposing elements of it for implementation within the Fiscal Year 2024-25 Capital Improvement Program budget.

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS
This action is not subject to review pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

CONSIDERATION OF STRATEGIC PRIORITIES
This recommended action aligns with Strategic Priority No. 1 to “support and invest in sustainable infrastructure projects and programs consistent with the needs of our community”.

RECOMMENDED ACTION
It is recommended that Council adopt a resolution adopting the Local Roadway Safety Plan and authorizing its submittal to the California Department of Transportation.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Resolution No. 2024-XX

2. Final Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
RESOLUTION NO. 2024-XX

RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN
WHEREAS, a Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP) is a road safety planning document that addresses local safety needs, and provides a framework and opportunity for resolving unique local roadway safety needs within the City’s jurisdiction; and WHEREAS, the City was awarded grant funds in the amount of the $40,000 from the State of California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) for the preparation of the City’s LRSP; and, WHEREAS, on June 29, 2022 the City Council awarded a professional services agreement to Minagar and Associates for the formation of the LRSP; and WHEREAS, the consultant analyzed accident data from the period of January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2021, identifying the ten (10) most impacted intersections and roadway segments within the City; and
WHEREAS, it was determined that the highest collision intersections were on Big Bear Blvd, which is the responsibility of the State of California, staff opted to expand the report to the top twenty (20) intersections, ten (10) local roadway intersections, and ten (10) intersections under Caltrans purview; and
WHEREAS, a stakeholder meeting was held with Caltrans District 8, Bear Valley Unified School District, Big Bear Lake Chamber of Commerce, San Bernardino Sheriff’s Department, and Big Bear Fire to address all potential safety concerns and areas; and WHEREAS, it is required that all state, county, and local agencies adopt an LRSP to be eligible to receive Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) and other grants such as Safe Streets and Roads for All (SS4A); and
WHEREAS, the LRSP will be used as a guide for future capital improvement projects, and City staff will be creating a work plan to address the high-risk local roadway areas to increase safety citywide; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Big Bear Lake that:

1. The Local Roadway Safety Plan is adopted as presented.

2. Staff is authorized to submit the Local Roadway Safety Plan to the California Department of Transportation.

Item 1.4
Attachment 1
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of February, 2024.

Perri Melnick, Mayor
ATTEST:

Erica Stephenson
City Clerk

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) ss

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:
_________________________
Erica Stephenson, City Clerk
T
City of Big Bear Lake
Department of Public Works
42040 Garstin Dr.

Big Bear Lake, CA 92315
PREPARED FOR:

MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

Traffic/Civil/Electrical Engineering – ITS – Transportation Planning – CEM 23282 Mill Creek Drive, Suite 120, East Tower
Laguna Hills, CA 92653
Tel: (949)707-1199
FINAL
Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP) Project
for the
City of Big Bear Lake
November 6, 2023
PREPARED BY:

Collisions by Crash Severity
State Route 18
San Bernardino County
Big Bear Lake
City of Big Bear Lake Concentration of Collisions by “Point” (2017-2021) Item 1.4
Attachment 2
FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 1
Table of Contents
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS....................................................................................................... 9 Executive Summary...............................................................................................................10 Statement of Protection of Data From Discovery and Admissions .........................................11 List of Acronyms....................................................................................................................12

1. Introduction ....................................................................................................................13

2. Vision and Goals............................................................................................................14

3. Safety Partners ..............................................................................................................15

3.1 Safety Leadership ........................................................................................................15

3.2 Stakeholders................................................................................................................16

4. Process..........................................................................................................................17

4.1 Systemic Approach ......................................................................................................17

4.2 Public Outreach ...........................................................................................................18

5. Existing Efforts...............................................................................................................19

6. Data Analysis and Summary ..........................................................................................20

6.1 Overall Summary .........................................................................................................20

6.2 Victim Summary...........................................................................................................28

6.3 Pedestrian Crash Summary .........................................................................................32

6.4 Active Transportation Program (ATP) Summary Data & Maps .....................................36

6.5 Crash Data Comparison and Analysis..........................................................................44

6.5 California Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) Ranking .........................................................48

7. Emphasis Areas.............................................................................................................51

7.1 High Collision Intersections ..........................................................................................52

7.2 High Collision Roadway Segments ..............................................................................53

7.3 Rear End Collisions Due to Unsafe Speeds .................................................................54

7.4 Broadside Collisions Due to Improper Turning or Automobile Right-of-Way.................55

8. High Collision Locations Identification, Pattern Analysis, and Recommended Improvements ....................................................................................................................56

8.1 High Collision State Intersections.................................................................................59

8.1.1 State Intersection 1: Big Bear Blvd (SR-18) & Sandalwood Dr ..................................60

8.1.2 State Intersection 2: Big Bear Blvd (SR-18) & Summit Blvd ......................................60

8.1.3 State Intersection 3: Big Bear Blvd (SR-18) & Lakeview Dr.......................................61

8.1.4 State Intersection 4: Big Bear Blvd (SR-18) & Thrush Dr...........................................61

8.1.5 State Intersection 5: Big Bear Blvd (SR-18) & Stanfield Cutoff ..................................61

8.1.6 State Intersection 6: Big Bear Blvd (SR-18) & Georgia St .........................................62 FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 2

8.1.7 State Intersection 7: Big Bear Blvd (SR-18) & Fox Farm Rd......................................62

8.1.8 State Intersection 8: Big Bear Blvd (SR-18) & Division Dr .........................................62

8.1.9 State Intersection 9: Big Bear Blvd (SR-18) & Cienega Rd........................................63

8.1.10 State Intersection 10: Big Bear Blvd (SR-18) & Knight Ave .....................................63

8.2 High Collision Local Intersections.................................................................................64

8.2.1 Local Intersection 1: Lahontan Dr & Mountainaire Ln ................................................65

8.2.2 Local Intersection 2: Moonridge Rd & Elm St ............................................................65

8.2.3 Local Intersection 3: Starvation Flats Rd & Fox Farm Rd ..........................................65

8.2.4 Local Intersection 4: Tehama Dr & Moonridge Rd.....................................................66

8.2.5 Local Intersection 5: Moonridge Rd & Brownie Ln.....................................................66

8.2.6 Local Intersection 6: Village Dr & Pine Knot Ave .......................................................66

8.2.7 Local Intersection 7: Pedder Rd & Pine Knot Ave......................................................67

8.2.8 Local Intersection 8: Brownie Ln & Thrush Dr ...........................................................67

8.2.9 Local Intersection 9: Crestwood Dr & Evergreen Dr ..................................................67

8.2.10 Local Intersection 10: Menlo Dr & Butte Ave ...........................................................68

8.3 High Collision State & Local Roadway Segments.........................................................69

8.3.1 Roadway Segment 1: Big Bear Blvd [SR-18] (from Stanfield Cutoff to Division Dr) ...70

8.3.2 Roadway Segment 2: Big Bear Blvd [SR-18] (Sandalwood Dr to Starvation Flats Rd) ..........................................................................................................................................70

8.3.3 Roadway Segment 3: Big Bear Blvd [SR-18] (from Fox Farm Rd to Lakeview Ctr) ...71

8.3.4 Roadway Segment 4: Big Bear Blvd [SR-18] (from Moonridge Wy to Catalina Rd) ...71

8.3.5 Roadway Segment 5: Big Bear Blvd [SR-18] (from Spruce Rd to Spruce Spur)........71

8.3.6 Roadway Segment 6: Moonridge Rd (from Brownie Ln to Evergreen Dr)..................72

8.3.7 Roadway Segment 7: Big Bear Blvd [SR-18] (from Knickerbocker Rd to Alden Rd)..72

8.3.8 Roadway Segment 8: Big Bear Blvd [SR-18] (from Wren Dr to Crane Dr).................72

8.3.9 Roadway Segment 9: Village Dr (from Cottage Ln to Bartlett Rd) .............................73

8.3.10 Roadway Segment 10: Colusa Dr (from Colusa Wy to Colusa Ln) ..........................73

9. Collision Diagrams, Preliminary Conceptual Plans for Recommended Improvements at High Collision Intersections and High Collision Roadway Segments, Cost Estimates, and Benefit Cost Ratios ............................................................................................................74

9.1 High Collision Intersections ..........................................................................................75

9.1.1 State Intersection 1: Big Bear Blvd (SR-18) & Sandalwood Dr ..................................75

9.1.1.1 State Intersection 1 Cost Estimate and Cost/Benefit Analysis ................................77

9.1.2 State Intersection 2: Big Bear Blvd (SR-18) & Summit Blvd ......................................78

9.1.2.1 State Intersection 2 Cost Estimate and Cost/Benefit Analysis ................................80 FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 3

9.1.3 State Intersection 3: Big Bear Blvd (SR-18) & Lakeview Dr.......................................81

9.1.3.1 State Intersection 3 Cost Estimate and Cost/Benefit Analysis ................................83

9.1.4 State Intersection 4: Big Bear Blvd (SR-18) & Thrush Dr...........................................84

9.1.4.1 State Intersection 4 Cost Estimate and Cost/Benefit Analysis ................................86

9.1.5 State Intersection 5: Big Bear Blvd (SR-18) & Stanfield Cutoff ..................................87

9.1.5.1 State Intersection 5 Cost Estimate and Cost/Benefit Analysis ................................89

9.1.6 State Intersection 6: Big Bear Blvd (SR-18) & Georgia St .........................................90

9.1.6.1 State Intersection 6 Cost Estimate and Cost/Benefit Analysis ................................92

9.1.7 State Intersection 7: Big Bear Blvd (SR-18) & Fox Farm Rd......................................93

9.1.7.1 State Intersection 7 Cost Estimate and Cost/Benefit Analysis ................................95

9.1.8 State Intersection 8: Big Bear Blvd (SR-18) & Division Dr .........................................96

9.1.8.1 State Intersection 8 Cost Estimate and Cost/Benefit Analysis ................................98

9.1.9 State Intersection 9: Big Bear Blvd (SR-18) & Cienega Rd........................................99

9.1.9.1 State Intersection 9 Cost Estimate and Cost/Benefit Analysis ..............................101

9.1.10 State Intersection 10: Big Bear Blvd (SR-18) & Knight ..........................................102

9.1.10.1 State Intersection 10 Cost Estimate and Cost/Benefit Analysis ..........................104

9.2.1 Local Intersection 1: Lahontan Dr & Mountainaire Ln ..............................................105

9.2.1.1 Local Intersection 1 Cost Estimate and Cost/Benefit Analysis..............................107

9.2.2 Local Intersection 2: Moonridge Rd & Elm St ..........................................................108

9.2.2.1 Local Intersection 2 Cost Estimate and Cost/Benefit Analysis..............................109

9.2.3 Local Intersection 3: Starvation Flats Rd & Fox Farm Rd ........................................110

9.2.3.1 Local Intersection 3 Cost Estimate and Cost/Benefit Analysis..............................112

9.2.4 Local Intersection 4: Tehama Dr & Moonridge Rd...................................................113

9.2.4.1 Local Intersection 4 Cost Estimate and Cost/Benefit Analysis..............................115

9.2.5 Local Intersection 5: Moonridge Rd & Brownie Ln...................................................116

9.2.5.1 Local Intersection 5 Cost Estimate and Cost/Benefit Analysis..............................118

9.2.6 Local Intersection 6: Village Dr & Pine Knot Ave .....................................................119

9.2.6.1 Local Intersection 6 Cost Estimate and Cost/Benefit Analysis..............................121

9.2.7 Local Intersection 7: Pedder Rd & Pine Knot Ave....................................................122

9.2.7.1 Local Intersection 7 Cost Estimate and Cost/Benefit Analysis..............................124

9.2.8 Local Intersection 8: Brownie Ln & Thrush Dr .........................................................125

9.2.8.1 Local Intersection 8 Cost Estimate and Cost/Benefit Analysis..............................127

9.2.9 Local Intersection 9: Crestwood Dr & Evergreen Dr ................................................128

9.2.9.1 Local Intersection 9 Cost Estimate and Cost/Benefit Analysis..............................130

9.2.10 Local Intersection 10: Menlo Dr & Butte Ave .........................................................131 FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 4

9.2.10.1 Local Intersection 10 Cost Estimate and Cost/Benefit Analysis ..........................133

9.3 High Collision State & Local Roadway Segments.......................................................134

9.3.1 Roadway Segment 1: Big Bear Blvd [SR-18] (from Stanfield Cutoff to Division Dr) . 134

9.3.1.1 Roadway Segment 1 Cost Estimate and Cost/Benefit Analysis............................138

9.3.2 Roadway Segment 2: Big Bear Blvd [SR-18] (from Sandalwood Dr to Starvation Flats Rd)...................................................................................................................................139

9.3.2.1 Roadway Segment 2 Cost Estimate and Cost/Benefit Analysis............................141

9.3.3 Roadway Segment 3: Big Bear Blvd [SR-18] (from Fox Farm Rd to Lakeview Ctr) . 142

9.3.3.1 Roadway Segment 3 Cost Estimate and Cost/Benefit Analysis............................144

9.3.4 Roadway Segment 4: Big Bear Blvd [SR-18] (from Moonridge Wy to Catalina Rd) . 145

9.3.4.1 Roadway Segment 4 Cost Estimate and Cost/Benefit Analysis............................147

9.3.5 Roadway Segment 5: Big Bear Blvd [SR-18] (from Spruce Rd to Spruce Spur)......148

9.3.5.1 Roadway Segment 5 Cost Estimate and Cost/Benefit Analysis............................150

9.3.6 Roadway Segment 6: Moonridge Rd (from Brownie Ln to Evergreen Dr)................151

9.3.6.1 Roadway Segment 6 Cost Estimate and Cost/Benefit Analysis............................153

9.3.7 Roadway Segment 7: Big Bear Blvd [SR-18] (from Knickerbocker Rd to Alden Rd)154

9.3.7.1 Roadway Segment 7 Cost Estimate and Cost/Benefit Analysis............................156

9.3.8 Roadway Segment 8: Big Bear Blvd [SR-18] (from Wren Dr to Crane Dr)...............157

9.3.8.1 Roadway Segment 8 Cost Estimate and Cost/Benefit Analysis............................159

9.3.9 Roadway Segment 9: Village Dr (from Cottage Ln to Bartlett Rd) ...........................160

9.3.9.1 Roadway Segment 9 Cost Estimate and Cost/Benefit Analysis............................162

9.3.10 Roadway Segment 10: Colusa Dr (from Colusa Wy to Colusa Ln) ........................163

9.3.10.1 Roadway Segment 10 Cost Estimate and Cost/Benefit Analysis........................165 Appendix A: Stakeholders Meeting of October 23, 2023
FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 5
List of Tables
Table 1: Number of Crashes per Day of Week per Time...........................................................23 Table 2: Active Transportation Program Number of Crashes per Day of Week per Time ..........42 Table 3: City of Big Bear Lake OTS Crash Ranking Results 2020 ............................................48 Table 4: City of Big Bear Lake Engineering Countermeasures Toolbox ....................................58 Table 5: List of High Collision Intersections on State Highway (SR 18).....................................59 Table 6: State Intersection Number of Collisions and Ranking in the City of Big Bear Lake ......59 Table 7: Intersection 1 Number of Collisions and Corresponding Primary Collision Factor........60 Table 8: Intersection 2 Number of Collisions and Corresponding Primary Collision Factor........60 Table 9: Intersection 3 Number of Collisions and Corresponding Primary Collision Factor........61 Table 10: Intersection 4 Number of Collisions and Corresponding Primary Collision Factor......61 Table 11: Intersection 5 Number of Collisions and Corresponding Primary Collision Factor......61 Table 12: Intersection 6 Number of Collisions and Corresponding Primary Collision Factor......62 Table 13: Intersection 7 Number of Collisions and Corresponding Primary Collision Factor......62 Table 14: Intersection 8 Number of Collisions and Corresponding Primary Collision Factor......62 Table 15: Intersection 9 Number of Collisions and Corresponding Primary Collision Factor......63 Table 16: Intersection 10 Number of Collisions and Corresponding Primary Collision Factor....63 Table 17: List of High Collision Intersections on Local Roadway...............................................64 Table 18: Intersection Number of Collisions and Ranking in the City of Big Bear Lake..............64 Table 19: Intersection 1 Number of Collisions and Corresponding Primary Collision Factor......65 Table 20: Intersection 2 Number of Collisions and Corresponding Primary Collision Factor......65 Table 21: Intersection 3 Number of Collisions and Corresponding Primary Collision Factor......65 Table 22: Intersection 4 Number of Collisions and Corresponding Primary Collision Factor......66 Table 23: Intersection 5 Number of Collisions and Corresponding Primary Collision Factor......66 Table 24: Intersection 6 Number of Collisions and Corresponding Primary Collision Factor......66 Table 25: Intersection 7 Number of Collisions and Corresponding Primary Collision Factor......67 Table 26: Intersection 8 Number of Collisions and Corresponding Primary Collision Factor......67 Table 27: Intersection 9 Number of Collisions and Corresponding Primary Collision Factor......67 Table 28: Intersection 10 Number of Collisions and Corresponding Primary Collision Factor....68 Table 29: List of High Collision State & Local Roadway Segments ...........................................69 Table 30: State & Local Roadway Segment Number of Collisions and Ranking........................69 Table 31: Roadway Segment 1 Number of Collisions and Primary Collision Factor ..................70 Table 32: Roadway Segment 2 Number of Collisions and Primary Collision Factor ..................70 Table 33: Roadway Segment 3 Number of Collisions and Primary Collision Factor ..................71 Table 34: Roadway Segment 4 Number of Collisions and Primary Collision Factor ..................71 Table 35: Roadway Segment 5 Number of Collisions and Primary Collision Factor ..................71 Table 36: Roadway Segment 6 Number of Collisions and Primary Collision Factor ..................72 Table 37: Roadway Segment 7 Number of Collisions and Primary Collision Factor ..................72 Table 38: Roadway Segment 8 Number of Collisions and Primary Collision Factor ..................72 Table 39: Roadway Segment 9 Number of Collisions and Primary Collision Factor ..................73 Table 40: Roadway Segment 10 Number of Collisions and Primary Collision Factor ................73 Table 41: State Intersection 1 Cost Estimate ............................................................................77 Table 42: State Intersection 2 Cost Estimate ............................................................................80 Table 43: State Intersection 3 Cost Estimate ............................................................................83 Table 44: State Intersection 4 Cost Estimate ............................................................................86 Table 45: State Intersection 5 Cost Estimate ............................................................................89 Table 46: State Intersection 6 Cost Estimate ............................................................................92 FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 6
Table 47: State Intersection 7 Cost Estimate ............................................................................95 Table 48: State Intersection 8 Cost Estimate ............................................................................98 Table 49: State Intersection 9 Cost Estimate ..........................................................................101 Table 50: State Intersection 10 Cost Estimate.........................................................................104 Table 51: Local Intersection 1 Cost Estimate ..........................................................................107 Table 52: Local Intersection 3 Cost Estimate ..........................................................................112 Table 53: Local Intersection 4 Cost Estimate ..........................................................................115 Table 54: Local Intersection 5 Cost Estimate ..........................................................................118 Table 55: Local Intersection 6 Cost Estimate ..........................................................................121 Table 56: Local Intersection 7 Cost Estimate ..........................................................................124 Table 57: Local Intersection 8 Cost Estimate ..........................................................................127 Table 58: Local Intersection 9 Cost Estimate ..........................................................................130 Table 59: Local Intersection 10 Cost Estimate ........................................................................133 Table 60: Roadway Segment 1 Cost Estimate ........................................................................138 Table 61: Roadway Segment 2 Cost Estimate ........................................................................141 Table 62: Roadway Segment 3 Cost Estimate ........................................................................144 Table 63: Roadway Segment 4 Cost Estimate ........................................................................147 Table 64: Roadway Segment 5 Cost Estimate ........................................................................150 Table 65: Roadway Segment 6 Cost Estimate ........................................................................153 Table 66: Roadway Segment 7 Cost Estimate ........................................................................156 Table 67: Roadway Segment 8 Cost Estimate ........................................................................159 Table 68: Roadway Segment 9 Cost Estimate ........................................................................162 Table 69: Roadway Segment 10 Cost Estimate ......................................................................165 Table 70: Total Construction Cost of Intersections and Roadway Segments...........................166 FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 7
List of Figures
Figure 1: Local Road Safety Plan – Your Map to Safer Roadways............................................13 Figure 2: City of Big Bear Lake Display of Collisions by Point ...................................................20 Figure 3: City of Big Bear Lake Display of Collisions by Cluster................................................21 Figure 4: City of Big Bear Lake Number of Crashes by Crash Severity .....................................22 Figure 5: Number of Crashes by Type of Crash ........................................................................23 Figure 6: Number of Crashes by (PCF) Primary Crash Factor Violation....................................27 Figure 7: Number of Victims by Victim Degree of Injury ............................................................28 Figure 8: Number of Victims by Victim Role ..............................................................................29 Figure 9: Number of Victims by Victim Safety Equipment..........................................................30 Figure 10: Number of Victims by Victim Gender and Age..........................................................31 Figure 11: City of Big Bear Lake Number of Crashes by Type of Violation................................33 Figure 12: City of Big Bear Lake Number of Crashes by Pedestrian Action...............................34 Figure 13: City of Big Bear Lake Number of Crashes by Lighting..............................................35 Figure 14: City of Big Bear Lake Number of Crashes by Weather.............................................36 Figure 15: City of Big Bear Lake Active Transportation Program Heat Map ..............................37 Figure 16: City of Big Bear Lake Active Transportation Program Hexagonal Grid Map .............38 Figure 17: City of Big Bear Lake Active Transportation Program Specific Collision Map ...........39 Figure 18: Active Transportation Program Number of Crashes by Crash Severity ....................40 Figure 19: Active Transportation Program Number of Crashes by Type of Crash .....................41 Figure 20: Number of Crashes by Primary Crash Factor PCF Violation ....................................43 Figure 21: SWITRS Number and Percentage of Crash Severity Types in Terms of Local, County, and State .....................................................................................................................44 Figure 22: SWITRS Number and Percentage of Victims in Terms of Local, County, and State .45 Figure 23: SWITRS Number and Percentage of Crash Locations in Terms of Local, County, and State .........................................................................................................................................46 Figure 24: SWITRS Number and Percentage of Crash Types in Terms of Local, County, and State .........................................................................................................................................47 Figure 25: State Intersection 1 Crash Diagram- 8 Collisions .....................................................75 Figure 26: State Intersection 2 Crash Diagram- 8 Collisions .....................................................78 Figure 27: State Intersection 3 Crash Diagram- 8 Collisions .....................................................81 Figure 28: State Intersection 4 Crash Diagram- 6 Collisions .....................................................84 Figure 29: State Intersection 5 Crash Diagram- 5 Collisions .....................................................87 Figure 30: State Intersection 6 Crash Diagram- 4 Collisions .....................................................90 Figure 31: State Intersection 7 Crash Diagram- 4 Collisions .....................................................93 Figure 32: State Intersection 8 Crash Diagram- 4 Collisions .....................................................96 Figure 33: State Intersection 9 Crash Diagram- 4 Collisions .....................................................99 Figure 34: State Intersection 10 Crash Diagram- 3 Collisions .................................................102 Figure 35: Local Intersection 1 Crash Diagram- 3 Collisions ...................................................105 Figure 36: Local Intersection 2 Crash Diagram- 3 Collisions ...................................................108 Figure 37: Moonridge Rd & Elm St Intersection Improvement Project (October 2022) ............109 Figure 38: Local Intersection 3 Crash Diagram- 2 Collisions ...................................................110 Figure 39: Local Intersection 4 Crash Diagram- 2 Collisions ...................................................113 Figure 40: Local Intersection 5 Crash Diagram- 2 Collisions ...................................................116 Figure 41: Local Intersection 6 Crash Diagram- 2 Collisions ...................................................119 Figure 42: Local Intersection 7 Crash Diagram- 2 Collisions ...................................................122 Figure 43: Local Intersection 8 Crash Diagram- 2 Collisions ...................................................125 FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 8
Figure 44: Local Intersection 9 Crash Diagram- 2 Collisions ...................................................128 Figure 45: Local Intersection 10 Crash Diagram- 1 Collision...................................................131 Figure 46: Roadway Segment 1 Crash Diagram- 17 Collisions ...............................................134 Figure 47: Roadway Segment 2 Crash Diagram- 9 Collisions .................................................139 Figure 48: Roadway Segment 3 Crash Diagram- 5 Collisions .................................................142 Figure 49: Roadway Segment 4 Crash Diagram- 5 Collisions .................................................145 Figure 50: Roadway Segment 5 Crash Diagram- 3 Collisions .................................................148 Figure 51: Roadway Segment 6 Crash Diagram- 3 Collisions .................................................151 Figure 52: Roadway Segment 7 Crash Diagram- 3 Collisions .................................................154 Figure 53: Roadway Segment 8 Crash Diagram- 3 Collisions .................................................157 Figure 54: Roadway Segment 9 Crash Diagram- 2 Collisions .................................................160 Figure 55: Roadway Segment 10 Crash Diagram- 2 Collisions ...............................................163 FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 9
_____________________________________________________________________________________

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

CITY COUNCIL
Mayor: Perri Melnick
Mayor Pro Tem: Kendi Segovia
Council Member: Rick Herrick
Council Member: Bynette Mote
Council Member: Randall Putz

PARTNERS
City Departments: Public Works, Engineering, Planning, Police & Fire Caltrans District 8
Big Bear Valley Unified School District
Santa Bernardino County Transportation Authority (SBCTA) Big Bear Lake Chamber of Commerce
General Public of the City of Big Bear Lake

CITY STAFF
City Manager: Erik Sund
Director of Public Works: Sean Sullivan
Project Manager: Katya Meyer
Sheriff Captain: Kelly Craig
Fire Chief: Jeff Willis
____________________________________________________________________________________ _
FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 10
Executive Summary
The objective of the City of Big Bear Lake Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP) is to establish a safe transportation environment that has safer roads, safer people, safer speeds, and safer vehicles. As part of this safety plan for the City of Big Bear Lake, Minagar & Associates, Inc. identified, prioritized, and analyzed roadway safety improvements on the City of Big Bear Lake’s intersections and roadway segments. This safety plan also provides the proposed countermeasures that address collision patterns for both intersections and roadway segments, to ultimately reduce collisions in the City’s high collision locations. From January 1, 2017 until December 31, 2021, there has been a total of 385 collisions that included Killed and Severely Injured (KSI), Visible Injury, Possible Injury, and Property Damage Only (PDO) severities that occurred on both State Route 18 (Big Bear Blvd) and local streets, which in total, included 5 fatalities and 197 injured victims. The most common types of collision were Rear-End (88), Broadside (83), and Sideswipe (68) Collisions. Primary Collision Factor (PCF) violations that caused the most collisions were Unsafe Speed (144), Improper Turning (60), and Automobile Right of Way (45). Victims were mostly drivers (110) and passengers (67). There have been 15 collisions involved with pedestrians. The highest number of victims happened to be in the age range of 25 to 29 years old. A Local Road Safety Plan is a major element to ameliorate transportation and traffic safety within a city. This LRSP was prepared and developed in compliance with the State and Federal guidelines for eligibility to apply for the funding of Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP). In addition to the provided countermeasures for collision patterns, this Safety Plan also provides the corresponding cost estimates and benefit to cost ratios, to support applications for the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP).

DISCOVERY AND ADMISSION INTO EVIDENCE OF CERTAIN REPORTS, SURVEYS, AND INFORMATION—Notwithstanding any other provision of law, reports, surveys, schedules, lists, or data compiled or collected for any purpose relating to this section, shall not be subject to discovery or admitted into evidence in a Federal or State court proceeding or considered for other purposes in any action for damages arising from any occurrence at a location identified or addressed in the reports, surveys, schedules, lists, or other data.

Per Section 409 of Title 23, United States Code [23 U.S.C. §409] DISCOVERY AND ADMISSION AS EVIDENCE OF CERTAIN REPORTS AND SURVEYS—Notwithstanding any other provision of law, reports, surveys, schedules, lists, or data compiled or collected for the purpose of identifying, evaluating, or planning the safety enhancement of potential accident sites, hazardous roadway conditions, or railway-highway crossings, pursuant to sections 130, 144, and 148 of this title or for the purpose of developing any highway safety construction improvement project which may be implemented utilizing Federal-aid highway funds shall not be subject to discovery or admitted into evidence in a Federal or State court proceeding or considered for other purposes in any action for damages arising from any occurrence at a location mentioned or addressed in such reports, surveys, schedules, lists, or data.

1. Introduction
The City of Big Bear Lake is taking the initiative to improve the City’s traffic safety by implementing a Local Roadway Safety Plan that aims to reduce traffic collisions by analyzing the factors that previously impacted prominent intersections and roadway segments in the City.

This report documents the City of Big Bear Lake’s work to assess and improve transportation safety conditions.

In this Safety Plan, a systemic approach was utilized to identify and analyze collision patterns that had impacted high collision intersections and roadway segments. For each high collision location, whether it was an intersection or a roadway segment, a table of number of collisions with the corresponding primary collision factor has been provided to understand the prominent collision factors. As part of the collision analysis, collision diagrams have been provided for high collision intersections and roadway segments in the City of Big Bear Lake.

Following the understanding and acknowledgement of collision patterns, countermeasures for each of the identified high collision intersections and roadway segments, were developed to potentially reduce traffic collisions in the future and ameliorate active transportation within the City. Furthermore, this Local Roadway Safety Plan includes collision data for high collision locations between January 1, 2017 and December 31, 2021, the analysis of collision data, and the proposed countermeasures for collision patterns. Depicted below in Figure 1 is the Local Road Safety Plan process provided by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA).

Figure 1: Local Road Safety Plan – Your Map to Safer Roadways FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 14

2. Vision and Goals
The objective of this plan is to strive towards a safer transportation environment by eliminating traffic fatalities and severe injuries while assuring efficient and equitable mobility for all road users. The City of Big Bear Lake plans to implement systemic countermeasures to target factors affecting citywide prominent intersections and roadways segments. This safety plan aims to reduce the risk of tragedies by taking a proactive, preventative approach that prioritizes traffic safety.

Vision Zero is an initiative approach to eliminate traffic fatalities and severe injuries. Road users will sometimes make mistakes however, the road system, traffic control devices, and traffic laws should be designed to minimize those unavoidable mistakes and reduce their probability to result in severe injuries or fatalities. Transportation and traffic engineers are expected to improve the general traffic environment by ameliorating existing traffic geometries and laws based on a good engineering judgement. However, the roadway users of the City of Big Bear Lake are still responsible for their mistakes and should follow all traffic laws.

Vision Zero unifies diverse stakeholders who
address the factors causing complexity when
it comes to traffic safety. It recognizes that
many factors contribute to safe mobility
including roadway design, speeds, behaviors,
technology, and enforced laws. As a result,
and as part of this safety plan, it sets goals to
achieve zero fatalities and severe injuries.

One of the City’s visions is to collaborate
with local agencies to promote a culture of
continuous transportation safety
improvement by coordinating with the San
Bernardino County Sheriff’s Department,
San Bernardino Department of Public
Health, and Big Bear Valley Unified School
District.

The aforementioned Vision shall eliminate traffic fatalities and severe injuries by achieving the following goals:
• Obtain accurate collision databases. Systematically identify and prioritize the City’s highest collision locations based on a 5-year collision history. • Engage with the local community, stakeholders, and City management to better understand factors that are affecting the traffic safety within the City of Big Bear Lake. • Utilize countermeasure strategies across all traffic safety disciplines, engineering, enforcement, education, emergency medical services, and emerging technologies. • Strive to reduce the City’s primary contributing factors in traffic collisions by ensuring the automobile right of way, maintaining a safe speed, and clear traffic signals and signs.

Source: www.archive.kpcc.org
Source: www.visionzeronetwrok.org
Source: U.S. Department of Transportation
FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 15

3. Safety Partners
To promote and create a safe transportation environment, collaboration across agencies known as safety partners is a necessity. Safety partners are the agencies, departments, and organizations whose input and support are foundational to a successful Local Roadway Safety Plan.

The safety leadership team is primarily comprised of City Departments that have key roles in the development, implementation, and operation of safety projects, programs, and policies. The safety leadership team is ultimately responsible for developing, adopting, and implementing the safety plan and program. The stakeholder team is distinguished from the leadership team. It comprises partner agencies and organizations who collaborate with the City and contribute to and assist with developing and implementing the plan. These agencies and their roles in the plan’s development and implementation are provided below:

3.1 Safety Leadership
I. City Council
The legislative body which is ultimately responsible for approving and adopting the final plan, setting safety policies, and approving budget and funding levels.

II. Public Works Department
Public Works is the lead City Department in developing and producing the Safety Plan and its periodic updates. The Public Works Department is responsible for assembling other City Departments and collaborating with Stakeholders. Public Works is responsible for capital project implementation. The City’s Public Works staff may also lead or collaborate in education campaigns.

III. San Bernardino County Sheriff’s Department
The Police Department maintains collision records and is responsible for carrying out enforcement practices and activities. The City’s Police Department may also lead or collaborate in education campaigns.

IV. San Bernardino County Fire Department
The City’s Fire Department serves in a support role in developing and producing the plan.

3.2 Stakeholders
I. Big Bear Valley Unified School District
Collaboration with the Big Bear Valley Unified School District to maintain and promote safety for all students within the City of Big Bear Lake.

II. San Bernardino County Sheriff’s Department
Roadways and functional areas of intersections require communication and collaboration.

Collaboration with the San Bernardino County Sheriff’s Department over the course of the safety plan is needed to ensure that local safety goals and policies are met.

III. San Bernardino County Transportation Authority (SBCTA) SBCTA is responsible for cooperative regional planning and furthering an efficient multi-modal transportation system countywide. SBCTA supports freeway construction projects, regional and local road improvements, train and bus transportation, railroad crossings, call boxes, ridesharing, congestion management efforts, and long-term planning studies IV. Caltrans District 8
Caltrans District 8 covers Riverside and San Bernardino Counties in Southern California, which includes 49 incorporated cities. It is the largest of 12 statewide Caltrans districts and covers approximately 28,650 square miles of land. Caltrans District 8 also has jurisdiction over Big Bear Blvd (SR-18) intersections and Big Bear Blvd (SR-18) roadway segments in the City of Big Bear Lake. Caltrans provides feedback on developing this Local Roadway Safety Plan and its resulting program in context to regional planning and potential funding issuance.

V. Big Bear Chamber of Commerce
The Big Bear Chamber of Commerce coordinates engagement with City businesses. The Chamber of Commerce provides feedback on recommended strategies and countermeasures to addressing traffic safety issues. Feedback from the Business community can provide valuable insight on the benefits and impacts of safety measures.

VI. General Public of the City of Big Bear Lake
The general public provides feedback and insight on recommended emphasis areas, high incident locations, collision factors, countermeasures, and implementation. Although collision records and statistics are foundational to this plan, public feedback is a critical supplement to that data. This feedback provides the safety plan with a holistic view of safety issues and a recommendation for what types of countermeasures are and are not desired by the community.

4. Process
This section describes the steps involved in preparing the safety plan, including a systemic approach that involves the analysis of collision data to identify high crash locations and prioritize countermeasures.

4.1 Systemic Approach
The systemic approach in preparing the safety plan comprises the following steps:

I. Develop Plan Goals and Objectives
Review the City’s existing planning documents to ensure the LRSP visions and goals align with planning effort and that the potential 5Es: Engineering, Education, Enforcement, Emergency Medical Services, and Emerging Technologies are consistent with local traffic safety and policies.

II. Analyze Collision Data
Obtain the latest 5-year collision data and analyze the collision factors. Determine high-risk intersections and roadway segments and identify significant risk factors.

III. Determine Focus Areas and Identify Crash Reduction Measures Identify emphasis areas and recommend feasible countermeasures at high-risk locations.

Evaluate Crash Reduction Factor (CRF) and the effectiveness of each countermeasure.

IV. Prioritize Countermeasures/Projects
Conduct Benefit-Cost Ratio (BCR) analysis on all countermeasures and projects. Prioritize projects that are most beneficial to the City’s roadway and intersection safety using BCR.

V. Prepare the Local Roadway Safety Plan
Prepare the LRSP that includes effective and efficient measures and implementation plan.

Identify priority projects for state or federal programming, grant funding opportunities, and implementation.

4.2 Public Outreach
The purpose of public outreach is to acquire the community’s concerns that are related to the safety of traffic. Such concerns may include speeding, jay walking, traffic signs and signals, pedestrian and bicycle safety on collector roads, and arterial streets. Public outreach is an essential tool to identify and summarize high-risk locations and collision factors based on the community’s concerns in addition to the collision analysis.

The target audience for the public outreach of this safety plan is the residents of the City of Big Bear Lake which include the following:
• City Council
• Public Works
• Engineering
• San Bernardino County Sheriff’s Department
• San Bernardino County Fire Department
• Big Bear Valley Unified School District
• San Bernardino County Transportation Authority (SBCTA) • Big Bear Lake Chamber of Commerce
• General Public of the City of Big Bear Lake
FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 19

5. Existing Efforts
This section summarizes the findings from various planning documents for the City of Big Bear Lake. The purpose of reviewing existing planning efforts is to ensure the LRSP goals and objectives along with recommended improvements are aligned with recent planning efforts for transportation safety.

The City of Big Bear Lake has identified several goals, policies from the following documents:
• Big Bear Valley Pedestrian, Bicycle, and Equestrian Master Plan (2014) In response to these needs, the City of Big Bear set-out to establish the Valley’s first comprehensive plan and vision for a well-planned, multi-modal system. Together with project partners, Caltrans and San Bernardino County, the City
initiated the Big Bear Valley Pedestrian, Bicycle and
Equestrian Master Plan (Master Plan) process, resulting in a guide and resource to support pedestrians, bicyclists and equestrians throughout the Valley.
• City of Big Bear Lake VMT Thresholds and Implementation Analysis (2022) As a result of the SB 743 final rulemaking and the
implementation deadline of July 1, 2020, the City of Big Bear Lake is adopting a set of VMT thresholds to support the shift from a delay‐based analysis to VMT. The City is also creating separate guidelines for the preparation of VMT analysis and traffic impact studies. This document provides a detailed discussion on implementing the CEQA VMT metric as
applicable to the City of Big Bear Lake. Substantial evidence and explanation on establishing the “Region,” VMT screening criteria, and VMT analysis thresholds are also described. • Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines For Local Transportation Analysis and Vehicle Miles Traveled Analysis, City of Big Bear Lake (2022)
Vehicle miles traveled (VMT) replaces auto delay and level of service (LOS) as the metric for transportation impact
determination. However, LOS still remains the metric for determining consistency with a jurisdiction’s General Plan requirements. This document has been prepared to comply with the updated CEQA Guidelines for determining
transportation impacts. As such, this document provides separate guidelines for LOS‐based Local Transportation
Analysis (LTA) (pursuant to the City’s General Plan
consistency requirements) and VMT analysis (pursuant to CEQA requirements).

6. Data Analysis and Summary
This section summarizes the results of a citywide collision analysis for the time period between January 1, 2017 and December 31, 2021. The purpose of studying the collision patterns and trends is to identify the factors that caused collisions to occur within the study timeframe. The focus is to identify high crash locations in the city in order to target the factors that are affecting these prominent locations.

6.1 Overall Summary
According to the California Highway Patrol (CHP) Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), during the period of January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2021, there were 385 collisions in total. 257 occurred on State Highways and 128 Occurred on local roadways. 5 victims were killed, and 197 victims were injured. There were 15 pedestrian collisions, 9 bike collisions, and 11 motorcycle collisions. A map from the University of California, Berkeley Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS) displays collisions by point as well as a map that displays collisions by cluster is shown in Figures 2 and 3.

Figure 2: City of Big Bear Lake Display of Collisions by Point (January 1, 2017 – December 31, 2021)
Collisions by Crash Severity
State Route 18
San Bernardino County
Big Bear Lake
FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 21
Figure 3: City of Big Bear Lake Display of Collisions by Cluster (January 1, 2017 - December 31, 2021)
Cluster of Collisions Scale
San Bernardino County
Big Bear Lake
San Bernardino County
FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 22
Figure 4: City of Big Bear Lake Number of Crashes by Crash Severity (January 1, 2017 - December 31, 2021)
Figure 4 displays number of crashes by crash severity, where the data is retrieved from California Highway Patrol (CHP) Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System. From 2017 to 2021, there were 5 fatal collisions, which was 1% of total collisions; 12 injury (severe) collisions, which was 3% of total collisions; 39 injury (other visible) collisions (10% of total collisions); 88 injury (complaint of pain) collisions (23%), and lastly, 241 Property Damage Only (PDO) collisions (63%), which represented the greatest number of collisions in the 5-year span. 5 12
39 88
241
0 50
100
150
200
250
300
1- Fatal 2- Injury (Severe) 3- Injury (Other
Visible)
4- Injury
(Complaint of
Pain)
Property Damage
Only (PDO)
Number of Crashes
Number of Crashes by Crash Severity
(385 Total)
FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 23
Figure 5: Number of Crashes by Type of Crash
(January 1, 2017 - December 31, 2021)
From 2017 to 2021, City of Big Bear Lake’s types of collision were reported by California Highway Patrol’s (CHP) Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System SWITRS database. There were 88 Rear End collisions during the selected period of time. This was the most common type of collision, which was 23% of total collisions in the City of Big Bear Lake. Broadside was the second common type, which was 21% of the total (83 collisions). There were 68 Sideswipe collisions, making it the third common type of collision (18% of the total).

Table 1: Number of Crashes per Day of Week per Time
48 68
88 83
35 11
15 22
15 7
0 1 4
0 1 3 1 0
0 10
20 30
40 50
60 70
80 90
100
Number of Crashes by Type of Crash (385 Total)
Total
KSI
FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 24
(January 1, 2017 - December 31, 2021)
Total Crashes (385)
Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday Scale 00:00 - 02:59 1 3 3 0 1 0 7 0
03:00 - 05:59 0 1 1 0 1 1 3 3
06:00 - 08:59 5 4 3 3 7 6 4 6
09:00 - 11:59 19 9 9 9 7 11 15 9
12:00 - 14:59 7 18 8 14 11 19 9 12
15:00 - 17:59 14 11 10 8 11 23 9 15
18:00 - 20:59 0 5 8 5 8 11 9 18
21:00 - 23:59 0 3 4 6 4 9 7 21
25:00 -Unknown 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 24
KSI Crashes (17)
Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday Scale 00:00 - 02:59 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0
03:00 - 05:59 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
06:00 - 08:59 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
09:00 - 11:59 2 0 0 1 0 0 0
12:00 - 14:59 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 2
15:00 - 17:59 0 0 0 0 1 1 2
18:00 - 20:59 0 0 1 0 3 0 0
21:00 - 23:59 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 3
25:00 - Unknown 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Collisions in the City of Big Bear Lake were listed for different time periods for each day of the week. 1 collision occurred on a Monday for each time period from 0:00 to 2:59 and 5 from 6:00 to 8:59. 19 collisions occurred in the period from 9:00 to 11:59. There were 7 collisions that occurred in the time period of 12:00 to 14:59 and 14 collisions that occurred from 15:00 to 17:59.

Tuesday from 0:00 to 2:59 had 3 collisions, 1 collision from 3:00 to 5:59, 4 collisions from 6:00 to 8:59, and 9 collisions from 9:00 to 11:59. In the afternoon, there were 18 collisions that occurred from 12:00 to 14:59, 11 collisions from 15:00 to 17:59, 5 collisions from 18:00 to 20:59, and 3 collisions from 21:00 to 23:59.

On Wednesdays, SWITRS recorded 3 collisions from 0:00 to 2:59 and 6:00 to 8:59, 1 collision from 3:00 to 5:59, 9 collisions from 9:00 to 11:59. 8 collisions occurred during the periods between 12:00 to 14:59 and 18:00 to 20:59. 10 collisions occurred from 15:00 to 17:59, and 4 collisions occurred during the time of 21:00 to 23:59.

Thursdays had 3 collisions occur at 6:00 to 8:59, 9 collisions occur at 9:00 to 11:59, and 14 collisions occur during 12:00 to 14:59, 8 collisions from 15:00 to 17:59, 5 collisions from 18:00 to 20:59. Lastly, there were 6 collisions from 21:00 to 23:59 and 1 collision where the time was unknown.

On Saturdays, 1 collision occurred from 3:00 to 5:59 and 6 collisions occurred during 6:00 to 8:59. 11 collisions occurred from 9:00 to 11:59 and 18:00 to 20:59. 19 collisions occurred from 12:00 to 14:59 and 23 collisions occurred from 15:00 to 17:59 which accounts for the highest in a time period and there were 9 collisions happening between 21:00 to 23:59. This makes Saturday having the highest number of total collisions (80) out of the other days of the week.

There were 7 collisions was recorded from 0:00 to 2:59 and 21:00 to 23:59, 3 collisions from the time periods 5:00 to 7:59, and 4 collisions from 6:00 to 8:59 on Sunday. 15 collisions occurred from 9:00 to 11:59, 9 collisions from 12:00 to 14:59, 15:00 to 17:59, and 18:00 to 20:59. In addition, 7 collisions occurred from 21:00 to 23:59. This makes Sunday having the second highest number of total collisions (63).

FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 26
24 19
0 144
7 7 5 8
60 45
3 4
12 1 1 1 1 1 5
20 7
0 0
17 1 4 1 3 2 1 2 1 1 1
0 20
40 60
80 100
120
140
160
0 - Unknown
1 - Driving or Bicycling Under the Influence of Alcohol or Drug 2 - Impeding Traffic
3 - Unsafe Speed
4 - Following Too Closely
5 - Wrong Side of Road
6 - Improper Passing
7 - Unsafe Lane Change
8 - Improper Turning
9 - Automobile Right of Way
10 - Pedestrian Violation11 - Pedestrian Violation
12 - Traffic Signals and Signs
13 - Hazardous Parking
14 - Lights
15 - Brakes
16 - Other Equipment
17 - Other Hazardous Violation
18 - Other Than Drive (or Pedestrian)
21- Unsafe Starting or Backing
22 - Other Improper Driving
23 - Pedestrian or "Other" Under the influence of Alchohol or… 24 - Fell Asleep
Not Stated
Number of Crashes by PCF Violation
Total
KSI
FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 27
Figure 6: Number of Crashes by (PCF) Primary Crash Factor Violation (January 1, 2017 - December 31, 2021)
According to CHP SWITRS, the Primary Collision Factor (PCF) violation that caused the most collisions in the City of Big Bear Lake (385 Crashes Total) were unsafe speeds, which resulted in 144 collisions (37%). The second most being 60 collisions were reported with improper turning PCF violation (15%). Automobile Right of Way made up of 45 collisions (11%), being the third most.
6%
5%
0%
37%
2%
2%
1%
2%
15%
11%
1%
1%
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1%
5%
2% 0%
0%
4%
0 - Unknown
1 - Driving or Bicycling Under the Influence of Alcohol or Drug 2 - Impeding Traffic
3 - Unsafe Speed
4 - Following Too Closely
5 - Wrong Side of Road
6 - Improper Passing
7 - Unsafe Lane Change
8 - Improper Turning
9 - Automobile Right of Way
10 - Pedestrian Violation
11 - Pedestrian Violation
12 - Traffic Signals and Signs
13 - Hazardous Parking
14 - Lights
15 - Brakes
16 - Other Equipment
17 - Other Hazardous Violation
18 - Other Than Drive (or Pedestrian)
21- Unsafe Starting or Backing
22 - Other Improper Driving
23 - Pedestrian or "Other" Under the influence of Alchohol or Drug 24 - Fell Asleep
Not Stated
FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 28

6.2 Victim Summary
Victim Degree of Injury Count %
1 - Killed 5 2.48
5 - Suspected Serious Injury 15 7.43
6 - Suspected Minor Injury 50 24.75
7 - Possible Injury 132 65.35
Total 202 100
Figure 7: Number of Victims by Victim Degree of Injury
(January 1, 2017 - December 31, 2021)
There were 202 victims of traffic collisions in the City of Big Bear Lake from 2017 to 2021. 5 victims were killed (2.48%), 15 victims reported with suspected serious injury (7.43%), 50 victims reported with suspected minor injury (24.75%), and 132 victims were reported with possible injury (65.35%). This data was not inclusive of property damage only (PDO) related crashes.

FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 30
Figure 9: Number of Victims by Victim Safety Equipment
(January 1, 2017 - December 31, 2021)
Victim Safety Equipment 1 Count %
Not Stated 43 21.29
A - None in Vehicle 3 1.49
B - Unknown 4 1.98
C - Lap Belt Used 3 1.49
D - Lap Belt Not Used 1 0.50
E - Shoulder Harness Used 2 0.99
G - Lap/Shoulder Harness Used 91 45.05
H - Lap/Shoulder Harness Not Used 6 2.97
L - Air Bag Deployed 15 7.43
M - Air Bag Not Deployed 13 6.44
N - Other 2 0.99
Q - Child Restraint in Vehicle Used 3 1.49
S - Child Restraint in Vehicle, Use Unknown 1 0.50
V - Driver, Motorcycle Helmet Not Used 4 1.98
W - Driver, Motorcycle Helmet Used 5 2.48
X - Passenger, Motorcycle Helmet Not Used 2 0.99
Y - Passenger, Motorcycle Helmet Used 4 1.98
Total 202 100
FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 31
Figure 10: Number of Victims by Victim Gender and Age
(January 1, 2017 - December 31, 2021)
For the total of 202 victims during the 5-year period, 47% of victims were females, 43% were males, and 10% were not stated. 7 victims were in the category of unknown age, 6 victims were 14 years old or younger, 17 victims were 15-19 years old, 24 victims were 20-24 years old, 25 victims were 25-29 years old, which was the highest age range. 23 victims were 30-34 years old, 17 victims were 35-39 years old, 9 victims were 40-44 years old. 11 victims were in the age range of 45-49 years old, 14 victims were in the age range of 50-54 years old, 8 victims were in the age range of 55-59 years old, and 10 victims were in the age range of 60-64 years old. 9 victims were 65-69 years old, 9 victims were 70-74 years old, and 6 were 75-79 years old.

Lastly, 5 victims were at the age between 80-84 years old and 2 victims age 85 or higher. This data was not inclusive of property damage only (PDO) related crashes.

6.3 Pedestrian Crash Summary
Party
Violation
Classification
Type of
Violation
Description Count %
Pedestrian 21954 Pedestrian failure to yield right-of-way to vehicles when crossing outside of a
marked or unmarked crosswalk
4 26.67
Driver 21950 Driver failure to yield right-of-way to
pedestrians at a marked or unmarked
crosswalk
2 13.33
Driver 22106 Unsafe starting or backing of a vehicle
on a highway
2 13.33
Driver 22107 Unsafe turning or moving right or left
on a roadway Turning without
signaling
2 13.33
Driver 21658 Failure to drive vehicle in single lane 1 6.67 Driver 22350 Speeding on the highway / Driving at a
dangerously high speed given
highway conditions like weather,
visibility, traffic, and highway
measurements, or driving at a speed
that endangers people or property
1 6.67
FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 33
Pedestrian 21955 Pedestrian failure to cross at
crosswalks between adjacent traffic
signal-controlled intersections
1 6.67
Unclear 23153 Driving under the influence of alcohol
or; drugs
1 6.67
Others Others 21988 (1) 1 6.67
Total 15 100
Figure 11: City of Big Bear Lake Number of Crashes by Type of Violation (January 1, 2017 - December 31, 2021)
FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 34
Pedestrian Action Count %
B - Crossing in Crosswalk at Intersection 4 26.67
D - Crossing Not in Crosswalk 3 20.00
E - In Road, Including Shoulder 8 53.33
Total 7 100
Figure 12: City of Big Bear Lake Number of Crashes by Pedestrian Action (January 1, 2017 - December 31, 2021)
FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 35
Figure 13: City of Big Bear Lake Number of Crashes by Lighting (January 1, 2017 - December 31, 2021)
Lighting Count %
Not Stated 1 6.67
A - Daylight 8 53.33
C - Dark - Street Lights 6 40.00
Total 15 100
FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 36
Figure 14: City of Big Bear Lake Number of Crashes by Weather (January 1, 2017 - December 31, 2021)

6.4 Active Transportation Program (ATP) Summary Data & Maps From 2017 to 2021 there has been 14 pedestrian collisions, 9 bicycle collisions, and 11 motorcycle collisions. Out of the 14 pedestrian collisions, there were 5 severe injuries, 3 visible Weather Count %
A - Clear 14 93.33
B - Cloudy 1 6.67
Total 15 100
FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 37
injuries, and 6 complaints of pain. Out of the 8 bicycle collisions, 1 was fatal, 5 were visible, and 2 were complaints of pain. The following figure displays the City’s ATP heat map. There is one pedestrian collision that has not yet been added or updated to the dataset yet.

Figure 15: City of Big Bear Lake Active Transportation Program Heat Map (January 1, 2017 - December 31, 2021)
FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 38
Figure 16: City of Big Bear Lake Active Transportation Program Hexagonal Grid Map (January 1, 2017 - December 31, 2021)
FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 39
Figure 17: City of Big Bear Lake Active Transportation Program Specific Collision Map (January 1, 2017 - December 31, 2021)
FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 40
Figure 18: Active Transportation Program Number of Crashes by Crash Severity (January 1, 2017 - December 31, 2021)
According to University of California, Berkeley Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS), from 2017 to 2021, there was 1 fatal collision (4.76%), 5 severe injury collisions (23.81%), 8 visible injury collisions (38.10%), and 7 was identified as of complaint of pain which counted for

33.33% of the total collisions. This data was not inclusive of property damage only (PDO) related crashes.

Crash Severity Count %
1 - Fatal 1 4.76
2 - Injury (Severe) 5 23.81
3 - Injury (Other Visible) 8 38.10
4 - Injury (Complaint of Pain) 7 33.33
Total 21 100
FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 41
Figure 2: Active Transportation Program Number of Crashes by Type of Crash (January 1, 2017 - December 31, 2021)
There were 2 head-on collisions (9.52%), 1 sideswipe collision (4.76%), 3 broadside collisions (14.2%), 12 vehicle/pedestrian collisions (57.14%) which makes up the majority type of collisions, and 3 other collisions (14.29%). This data was not inclusive of property damage only (PDO) related crashes.

Type of Crash Count %
A - Head-On 2 9.52
B - Sideswipe 1 4.76
D - Broadside 3 14.29
G - Vehicle/Pedestrian 12 57.14
H - Other 3 14.29
Total 21 100
FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 42
Table 2: Active Transportation Program Number of Crashes per Day of Week per Time (January 1, 2017 - December 31, 2021)
FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 43
Figure 20: Number of Crashes by Primary Crash Factor PCF Violation According to University of California, Berkeley Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS) From 2017 to 2021, out of the 21 collisions, 1 collision had (00-Unknown), 1 collision had (01- Driving or Bicycling Under the Influence of Alcohol or Drug), 1 collision had (03-Unsafe Speed), 2 collisions had (05-Wrong Side of Road), 3 collisions had (08-Improper Turning), 1 collision had (10-Automobile Right of Way), 3 collisions had (10-Pedestrian Right of Way), 4 collisions had (11-Pedestrian Violation), 2 collisions had (12-Traffic Signals and Signs), 1 collision had (14-Lights), and finally 2 collisions had (21-Unsafe Starting or Backing) as PCF Violation. This data was not inclusive of property damage only (PDO) related crashes.

PCF Violation Count %
00 - Unknown 1 4.76
01 - Driving or Bicycling Under the
Influence of Alcohol or Drug
1 4.76
03 - Unsafe Speed 1 4.76
05 - Wrong Side of Road 2 9.52
08 - Improper Turning 3 14.29
09 - Automobile Right of Way 1 4.76
10 - Pedestrian Right of Way 3 14.29
11 - Pedestrian Violation 4 19.05
12 - Traffic Signals and Signs 2 9.52
14 - Lights 1 4.76
21 - Unsafe Starting or Backing 2 9.52
Total 21 100
FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 44

6.5 Crash Data Comparison and Analysis
Crash Severity
Count (%)
Big Bear Lake, CA San Bernardino County California
1 Fatal 5 (3%) 1,559 (3%) 17,815 (2%)
2 Injury (Severe) 13 (9%) 4,190 (8%) 68,669 (8%)
3 Injury (Other Visible) 43 (28%) 16,686 (32%) 283,632 (32%) 4 Injury (Complaint of Pain) 91 (60%) 29,507 (57%) 520,717 (58%) Total 152 (100%) 51,942 (100%) 890,833 (100%)
Figure 21: SWITRS Number and Percentage of Crash Severity Types in Terms of Local, County, and State
(January 1, 2017 - December 31, 2021)
From the Transportation Injury Mapping System, the Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System contains crash data reported to California Highway Patrol (CHP) from the local and governmental agencies. From Figure 21, crash severity data is compared in the local, county, and state level. From the period between January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2021, City of Big Bear Lake percentage proportions for 2) Injury-Severe (9%), and 4) Injury-Complaint of Pain (60%) crash severity is higher than the county (8%, 57%) and state (8%, 58%) categories. The percentage of 3) Injury-Other Visible (28%) is lower than the county (32%) and state (32%) categories. The data displayed shows a higher number of severe and complaint of pain injuries and lower number of visible injuries in terms of percentage proportion for the City of Big Bear Lake, compared to San Bernardino County and California. This data was not inclusive of property damage only (PDO) related crashes.
3%
9%
28%
60%
3%
8%
32%
57%
2%
8%
32%
58%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
Fatal Injury (Severe) Injury (Other Visible) Injury (Complaint of Pain) Percentage
Crash Severity
SWITRS Number and Percentage of Crash Severity
Types in Terms of Local, County, and State
City of Big Bear Lake San Bernardino County California
FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 45
Victims
Count (%)
Big Bear Lake, CA San Bernardino County California
Killed 5 (2%) 1,725 (2%) 19,330 (2%)
Injured 197 (98%) 73,619 (98%) 1,248,201 (98%)
Total 202 (100%) 75,344 (100%) 1,267,531 (100%)
Figure 22: SWITRS Number and Percentage of Victims in Terms of Local, County, and State
(January 1, 2017 - December 31, 2021)
From the Transportation Injury Mapping System, the Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System contains crash data reported to California Highway Patrol (CHP) from the local and governmental agencies. From Figure 22, number of victims killed and injured is compared in the local, county, and state level. From the period between January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2021, The data displayed shows the same proportion for the City of Big Bear Lake with 2% for killed and 98% for injured, compared to San Bernardino County and California. This data was not inclusive of property damage only (PDO) related crashes. 2%
98%
2%
98%
2%
98%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
Killed Injured
Percentage
Victims
SWITRS Number of Victims in Terms of Local, County,
and State
City of Big Bear Lake San Bernardino California
FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 46
Crash Location
Count (%)
Big Bear Lake, CA San Bernardino County California
State Highway 81 (53%) 20,953 (40%) 304,365 (34%)
Non-State Highway 71 (47%) 30,989 (60%) 586,468 (66%)
Total 152 (100%) 51,942 (100%) 890,833 (100%)
Figure 23: SWITRS Number and Percentage of Crash Locations in Terms of Local, County, and State
(January 1, 2017 - December 31, 2021)
From the Transportation Injury Mapping System, the Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System contains crash data reported to California Highway Patrol (CHP) from the local and governmental agencies. From Figure 23, crash location data is compared in the local, county, and state level. From the period between January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2021, City of Big Bear Lake percentage proportion for State highway crashes (53%) is higher than the county (40%) and state (34%) categories. The percentage Non-State Highway (47%) is much lower than the county (60%) and state (66%) categories. The data displayed shows a higher number of crashes that happened on State Highway than local roadway in terms of percentage proportion for the City of Big Bear Lake, compared to San Bernardino County and California.

This data was not inclusive of property damage only (PDO) related crashes. 53%
47%
40%
60%
34%
66%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
State Highway Non-State Highway
Percentage
Crash Location
SWITRS Number of Crash Locations in Terms of Local, County, and State
City of Big Bear Lake San Bernardino County California
FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 47
Crash Type
Count (%)
Big Bear Lake, CA San Bernardino County California
Pedestrian Crashes 15 (10%) 2,803 (5%) 65,666 (7%)
Bike Crashes 9 (6%) 1,309 (3%) 48,250 (5%)
Motorcycles Crashes 11 (7%) 3,675 (7%) 64,633 (7%)
Vehicle/Other Crashes 117 (77%) 44,155 (85%) 712,284 (80%) Total 152 (100%) 51,942 (100%) 890,833 (100%)
Figure 24: SWITRS Number and Percentage of Crash Types in Terms of Local, County, and State
(January 1, 2017 - December 31, 2021)
From the Transportation Injury Mapping System, the Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System contains crash data reported to California Highway Patrol (CHP) from the local and governmental agencies. From Figure 24, crash type data is compared in the local, county, and state level. From the period between January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2021, City of Big Bear Lake percentage proportion pedestrian crashes (10%) and bike crashes (8%) is higher than the county (5%, 3%) and state (7%, 5%). Meanwhile, the percentage for motorcycle crashes (7%) and vehicle/other crashes (77%) is lower or equal to the county (7%, 85%) and state (7%, 80%) categories. The data displayed shows a higher number of crashes that involved pedestrian and bike crashes and lower or equal number of crashes for motorcycles and vehicle/other in terms of percentage proportion for the City of Big Bear Lake, compared to San Bernardino County and California. This data was not inclusive of property damage only (PDO) related crashes. 10%
6% 7%
77%
5% 3%
7%
85%
7% 5% 7%
80%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
Pedestrian Crashes Bike Crashes Motorcycles
Crashes
Vehicle/Other
Crashes
Percentage
Crash Type
SWITRS Number of Crash Types in Terms of Local,
County, and State
City of Big Bear Lake San Bernardino California
FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 48

6.5 California Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) Ranking
Table 3: City of Big Bear Lake OTS Crash Ranking Results 2020 FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 49
The OTS Rankings were developed so that individual cities could compare their city’s traffic safety statistics to those of other cities with similar-sized populations. Cities could use these comparisons to see what areas they may have problems in and which they were doing well in.

The results helped both cities and OTS identify emerging or on-going traffic safety problem areas in order to help plan how to combat the problems and help with the possibility of facilitating grants It should be noted that OTS rankings are only indicators of potential problems; there are many factors that may either understate or overstate a city/county ranking that must be evaluated based on local circumstances. City rankings are for incorporated cities only, for local streets in those cities, and state highways that run through cities with shared jurisdiction with the CHP and the city.

Crash rankings are based on the Empirical Bayesian Ranking Method, which adds weights to different statistical categories including observed crash counts, population and vehicle miles traveled. The crash counts reflect the aggregated impacts of all influential factors containing even the unrecognized or unmeasurable ones (e.g. level of enforcement), and the population and vehicle miles traveled represent the important traffic exposure factors that affect crash occurrence. Counties are assigned statewide rankings, while cities are assigned population group rankings. The first table: Population – estimates matched to “Year”. DVMT – Daily Vehicle Miles Traveled. Caltrans estimate of the total number of miles all vehicles traveled on that city’s streets on an average day during that year. The number of cities in each group varies by year.

Cities are grouped by 2019 population: Group A – 15 cities, populations over 250,000, Group B – 59 cities, population 100,001-250,000, Group C – 105 cities, population 50,001-100,000, Group D – 94cities, population 25,001-50,000, Group E – 103 cities, population 10,001-25,000, Group F – 74 cities, population 2,501-10,000, Group G – 32 cities, population 1-2,500. City of Big Bear Lake is in Group F with an average population of 5192. Number 1 in the rankings is the highest, or “worst.” For example, a ranking of 1/74 is the highest or worst, 45/74 is average, and 74/74 is the lowest or best.
• Center Table: Type of Crash – This column delineates the different types of crashes OTS has chosen to show in the rankings. These represent the types with larger percentages of total killed and injured and areas of focus for the OTS grant program.

Victims Killed and Injured – This column shows the number of fatalities and injuries aggregated. Damage-only or fender-bender crashes are not included. Ranking – This column shows what ranking that city has as compared to other comparably sized incorporated cities in California for that particular type of crash. The first number is that city’s ranking for that type of crash. The second number is the total number of cities/counties within that population grouping. Types of Crashes: Total Fatal and Injury – The total number of victims involved in all crashes where there were fatalities and/or injuries in that city/county. Alcohol Involved – Crashes in which there were victims killed or injured where a party (driver, pedestrian, bicyclist) was classified as “Had Been Drinking.” Had Been Drinking Driver <21 – Crashes in which there were victims killed or injured where a driver who was under the age of 21 had been drinking. Had Been Drinking Driver 21-34 – Crashes in which there were victims killed or injured where a driver who was between the ages of 21 and 34 had been drinking. Motorcycles – Crashes in which there were victims killed or injured and a motorcycle was involved.

Pedestrians – Crashes in which there were victims killed or injured and a pedestrian was involved. Pedestrians <15 – Crashes in which there were victims killed or injured and a FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 50
pedestrian under the age of 15 was involved. Pedestrians 65+ – Crashes in which there were victims killed or injured and a pedestrian age 65 and older was involved. Bicycles – Crashes in which there were victims killed or injured and a bicyclist was involved.

Bicycles <15 – Crashes in which there were victims killed or injured and a bicyclist under age 15 was involved. Composite – Figures which show rankings only, an aggregate of several of the other rankings (Had Been Drinking 21-34, Had Been Drinking Under21, Alcohol Involved, Hit & Run, Nighttime and Speed crashes). These figures are a means to give an indication of over-all traffic safety. Bottom table: Speed Related – Crashes in which there were victims killed or injured where speed was the primary factor. Bottom table: Nighttime (9:00pm – 2:59am) – Crashes in which there were victims killed or injured that occurred between those hours, which are prime hours for DUI, speeding and drowsy driving crashes. Hit and Run – Crashes in which there were victims killed or injured and a driver left the scene. *DUI Arrests – DUI arrest figures are shown for cities only, not counties. The number of cities ranked against may be different than from the number of cities in the other categories. Not all cities report DUI arrests to the Department of Justice.

The City of Big Bear Lake with a composite score of 17/74 (Bottom 23%) is poor in comparison to 73 other incorporated cities with similar population in the most recent OTS ranking as of 2020. Based on “Types of Crashes,” total fatal and injury resulted to be 30 victims killed and injured, which ranked 30/74, which places the city at the bottom 41%. The City of Big Bear Lake performed poor in the speed related fatal and injury crashes with 12, ranking the city at 4/74. The city performed better in terms of DUI arrest made, with 31 and placed the city at 48/74.

7. Emphasis Areas
The project team identified four major emphasis areas for the city by utilizing the aforementioned analysis that included primary collision factors. The Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP) addresses the “5 Es” of traffic safety: Engineering, Enforcement, Education, Emergency Response, and Emerging Technologies. Each emphasis area utilizes the 5 Es addressed by SHSP, the following emphasis areas are discussed and analyzed in this section.

1. High Collision Intersections

2. High Collision Roadway Segments

3. Rear End Collisions Due to Unsafe Speeds

4. Broadside Collisions Due to Improper Turning or Automobile Right-of-Way FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 52

7.1 High Collision Intersections
The most prominent emphasis area is high collision intersections since most of the collisions in the City of Big Bear Lake occurred on intersections. Each intersection has its own unique geometry therefore, an analysis of each of the prominent twenty (20) intersections in the City of Big Bear Lake was concluded to understand the factors leading to collisions.

Education
• Conduct public information and education
campaign for safety laws regarding a safe
approach to an intersection.
• Raise awareness of the necessity of abiding
by the traffic safety laws.

Engineering
• Identify and rank high collision intersections within the City every two to three years. Consider information obtained from public input and feedback regarding unreported collisions to supplement crash data.
• Evaluate the primary factors leading to collisions at high collision roadway segments.
• Develop and implement countermeasures to tackle those factors. • Assess and report collision patterns before and after implementation of countermeasures and adjust as necessary.
• Maintain roadway signing and striping.
• Consider improving night time lighting.

Enforcement
• Prioritize patrol patterns at high-risk intersections to monitor traffic law violations which include right of way violations, traffic signals and signs, unsafe speed, and DUI.
• When laws are enforced and awareness of abiding by traffic safety laws is raised, intersection collisions will reduce abundantly.

Emergency Medical Services
• Consider targeted training for responding to specific high collision intersections and immediate treatment of predominant injuries at those locations.

Emerging Technologies
• Develop new methods to integrate multisource transportation data for developing different measurements of traffic safety for road users and identify safety issues associated with emerging electrical and automated vehicles.

7.2 High Collision Roadway Segments
Applying safety improvements to high collision roadway segments is also a necessity. Each roadway segment has its own unique geometry therefore, an analysis of each of the prominent ten (10) roadway segments in the City of Big Bear Lake was concluded to understand the factors leading to collisions that occurred.

Education
• Conduct public information and education campaign
for safety laws regarding safe speed, improper turning, unsafe lane change, and driving on the wrong side of
the road
• Raise awareness of the necessity of abiding by the
traffic safety laws.

Engineering
• Identify and rank high collision roadway segments within the City every two to three years. Consider information obtained from public input and feedback regarding unreported collisions to supplement crash data. • Evaluate the primary factors leading to collisions at high collision roadway segments.
• Develop and implement countermeasures to tackle those factors. • Assess and report collision patterns before and after implementation of countermeasures and adjust as necessary.
• Maintain roadway signing and striping.
• Consider improving night time lighting.

Enforcement
• Prioritize patrol patterns at high collision roadway segments to monitor traffic law violations which include unsafe speed and improper turning. • When laws are enforced and awareness of abiding by traffic safety laws is raised, roadway segment collisions will reduce abundantly.

Emergency Medical Services
• Consider targeted training for responding to specific high collision roadway segments and immediate treatment of predominant injuries at those locations.

Source: Beverly Samperio, The Arrow
FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 54

7.3 Rear End Collisions Due to Unsafe Speeds
Rear End Collisions ranked the highest type of collision with a total count of eighty-one (81) collisions out of 385 total crashes (23%). Rear end collisions are due to primary collision factor (PCF) of unsafe speeds.

Due to the constraints that the city can only deal with collisions that occur on city roadway jurisdiction, analysis was performed only on intersections and road segments of overturned collisions.

Education
• Conduct public information and education
campaign for safety laws regarding the undesired
risks of drinking and driving and as well as
maintaining a safe speed.
• Raise awareness of the necessity of not drinking while driving and maintaining a safe speed to avoid many undesired tragic events such as rear end collisions.

Engineering
• Identify locations where rear end collisions due to
unsafe speed are occurring within the City every two
to three years.
• Consider information obtained from public input and
feedback regarding unreported collisions to
supplement crash data.
• Develop and implement countermeasures to tackle rear end collisions due to unsafe speed.
• Assess and report collision patterns before and after implementation of countermeasures and adjust as necessary.

Enforcement
• Prioritize patrol patterns at DUI and high-speed locations to monitor traffic law violations which include DUI not maintaining a safe speed while operating a vehicle.
• When laws are enforced and awareness of abiding by traffic safety laws and signs is raised, overturned collisions due to unsafe speeds will reduce.

Emergency Medical Services
• Consider targeted training for responding to high-speed locations and immediate treatment of predominant injuries at those locations.

7.4 Broadside Collisions Due to Improper Turning or Automobile Right-of-Way
Broadside collisions ranked the second highest type of collisions with a total count of eighty-three (83) collisions out of 385 total crashes (21%) of Broadside collisions occurred due to the primary collision factor (PCF) of improper turning (30) and automobile right-of-way (17). Due to the constraints that the city can only deal with collisions that occur on city roadway jurisdiction, analysis was performed on intersections and road segments of hit object collisions.

Education
• Conduct public information and education campaign
for safety laws regarding a proper turning.
• Raise awareness of the necessity of abiding by the
traffic safety laws to avoid broadside collisions that
occur mostly due to improper turning or not giving
an automobile the right of way.

Engineering
• Identify locations where broadside collisions due to improper turning or automobile right-of-way are occurring within the city every two to three years. • Consider information obtained from public input and feedback regarding unreported collisions to supplement crash data.
• Develop and implement countermeasures to tackle hit object collisions due to improper turning.
• Assess and report collision patterns before and after implementation of countermeasures and adjust as necessary.
• Maintain roadway signing and striping.

Enforcement
• Prioritize patrol patterns at high collision intersections where broadside collisions due to improper turning or automobile right-of-way are occurring mostly to monitor traffic law violations which include the failure of stopping and waiting for a safe gap to approach the road.
• When laws are enforced and awareness of abiding by traffic safety laws and signs is raised, broadside collisions due to improper turning or automobile rightof-way will reduce abundantly.

Emergency Medical Services
• Consider targeted training for responding to high collision intersections where broadside collisions due to improper turning or automobile right-of-way are occurring mostly and immediate treatment of predominant injuries at those locations.

8. High Collision Locations Identification, Pattern Analysis, and Recommended Improvements
As part of the quantitative analysis, high collision intersections and roadway segments were identified and prioritized using the Crash Frequency methodology as described in the Local Roadway Safety Manual. Crash Frequency is defined as the number of crashes occurring within a determined study area. Minagar & Associates, Inc. took a further step and included the number of victims and their corresponding degree of injury for each intersection and roadway segment. As part of the qualitative analysis, Minagar & Associates, Inc. conducted a field assessment in the City of Big Bear Lake on October 10, 2022. The purpose of the field visit is to verify the characteristics and geometry of the existing intersection and roadway segment infrastructure and the viability of the recommended countermeasures. Conceptual plans were developed and updated with these safety countermeasures. For each of the identified high collision locations (intersections and roadway segments), prominent locations in the City were identified and ranked based on the following criteria:

1. Number of Collisions

2. Victim Degree of Injury

2.1. Killed

2.2. Suspected Serious Injury

2.3. Suspected Minor Injury

2.4. Possible Injury

2.5. Property Damage Only
Upon identifying and ranking prominent intersections and roadway segments, collisions were analyzed by identifying the Primary Collision Factor (PCF) that lead to the occurrence of each collision and the pattern. Upon completion of the analysis, recommendations were developed as safety mitigation measures to potentially mitigate similar collisions in the future.

Countermeasures have been proposed in complaince with the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. It is important to utilize Crash Modification Factor (CMF) when identifying potential systemic safety improvements. The CMF method is found in Part D of the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) Highway Safety Possible
Injury
Suspected
Minor
Injury
Suspected
Serious
Injury
Killed
Victim
Degree
of Injury
Number of Collisions
Property
Damage
Only
FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 57
Manual (HSM). CMFs are defined as the ratio of effectiveness of expected crashes with treatment in comparison to expected crashes without treatment. Furthermore, A CMF is a multiplicative factor used to determine the expected number of crashes after implementing the proposed countermeasures to ensure efficiency of utilizing and implementing the proposed countermeasures. Countermeasures with CMFs less than one are expected to reduce crashes.

On the other hand, countermeasures with CMFs greater than one are expected to increase crashes. CMFs are calculated as follows:

A Crash Reduction Factor (CRF) is similar and related to a CMF but stated in different terms. A CRF is defined as a percentage of crash reduction that might be expected after the implementation of a given countermeasure at a specific site. CRFs are calculated as follows:

Appropriate CMFs shall be used with caution. CMFs should be selected from the HSM Part D, the LRSM, or from the FHWA CMF Clearinghouse website (http://www.cmfclearinghouse.org).

On the other hand, countermeasures with CMFs greater than one are expected to increase crashes. CMFs are calculated as follows:

Appropriate CMFs shall be used with caution. CMFs should be selected from the HSM Part D, the LRSM, or from the FHWA CMF Clearinghouse website (http://www.cmfclearinghouse.org).

0.85 15% 90%
NS07 Upgrade intersection pavement
marking (NS.I.) X 0.75 25% 90%
NS09 Install flashing beacons as
advance warning (NS.I.) X 0.70 30% 90%
R22 Install/upgrade signs with new
fluorescent sheeting (regulatory
or warning)
X 0.85 15% 90%
R24 Install curve advance warning
signs X 0.75 25% 90%
R28 Install edge-lines and
centerlines X 0.75 25% 90%
R30 Install centerline rumble
strips/stripes X 0.80 20% 90%
S09 Install raised pavement markers
and striping (Through
Intersection)
X 0.90 10% 90%
S18PB Install Pedestrian Crossing (S.I.) X 0.75 25% 90% S21PB Modify signal phasing to
implement a Leading Pedestrian
Interval (LPI)
X

0.40 60% 90%
[1] Local Roadway Safety Manual Countermeasure Identification Number • NS: Non-Signalized Intersection
• R: Roadway Segment
• S: Signalized Intersection
[2] Crash Modification Factor
[3] Crash Reduction Factor
FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 59

8.1 High Collision State Intersections
High collision intersections are critical intersections that require the most analytical focus since it is anticipated that many collisions will occur within a high collision intersection based on its crash history. Table 5 displays the ten (10) most prominent state intersections on Big Bear Blvd (SR-18) in terms of number of collisions in the City of Big Bear Lake. Table 6 displays the ten (10) prominent state intersections with their ranking methodology.

Table 5: List of High Collision Intersections on State Highway (SR 18) Intersection
Identification
Number*
Intersection
Ranking
Number
Intersection Control Number of
Collisions**
1 1 Big Bear Blvd Sandalwood Dr Unsignalized 8
2 2 Big Bear Blvd Summit Blvd Signalized 8
3 3 Big Bear Blvd Lakeview Dr Unsignalized 8
4 4 Big Bear Blvd Thrush Dr Unsignalized 6
5 5 Big Bear Blvd Stanfield Cutoff Signalized 5
6 6 Big Bear Blvd Georgia St Signalized 4
7 7 Big Bear Blvd Fox Farm Rd Signalized 4
8 7 Big Bear Blvd Division Dr Signalized 4
9 9 Big Bear Blvd Cienega Rd Unsignalized 4
10 10 Big Bear Blvd Knight Ave Unsignalized 3
* Intersection Identification Number is merely an identification method utilized to avoid confusion with the Intersection Ranking Number.
** Total Number of Collisions during the 5-year period between January 1, 2017 and December 31, 2021.

Table 6: State Intersection Number of Collisions and Ranking in the City of Big Bear Lake Intersection
Ranking
Number
Intersection
Number of
Collisions*
Collision Severity
Killed Severe
Injury
Visible
Injury
Possible
Injury
Property
Damage
Only
1 Big Bear Blvd Sandalwood Dr 8 0 0 3 1 4
2 Big Bear Blvd Summit Blvd 8 0 0 1 1 6
3 Big Bear Blvd Lakeview Dr 8 0 0 0 1 7
4 Big Bear Blvd Thrush Dr 6 0 0 1 1 4
5 Big Bear Blvd Stanfield Cutoff 5 0 0 1 1 3
6 Big Bear Blvd Georgia St 4 0 0 1 3 0
7 Big Bear Blvd Fox Farm Rd 4 0 0 0 1 3
7 Big Bear Blvd Division Dr 4 0 0 0 1 3
9 Big Bear Blvd Cienega Rd 4 0 0 0 0 4
10 Big Bear Blvd Knight Ave 3 0 1 1 0 1
* Total Number of Collisions during the 5-year period between January 1, 2017 and December 31, 2021.

8.1.1 State Intersection 1: Big Bear Blvd (SR-18) & Sandalwood Dr Table 7: Intersection 1 Number of Collisions and Corresponding Primary Collision Factor Number of Collisions Primary Collision Factor
2 Improper Turning
2 Unsafe Speeds
1 Following Too Closely
1 Driving or Bicycling Under the Influence of Alcohol or Drug 1 Automobile Right of Way
1 Unknown
Total 8
Pattern: Motorists are not maintaining safe speeds and are turning improperly from the long road segment from the north.

High Collision Recommendations:

1. Install "Cross Traffic Does Not Stop" Sign [W4-4P].

2. Install Speed Limit Sign (40) [R2-1]

8.1.2 State Intersection 2: Big Bear Blvd (SR-18) & Summit Blvd Table 8: Intersection 2 Number of Collisions and Corresponding Primary Collision Factor Number of Collisions Primary Collision Factor
3 Improper Turning
3 Unsafe Speeds
1 Automobile Right of Way
1 Hazardous Parking
Total 8
Pattern: Motorists are not maintaining safe speeds and are improperly yielding to oncoming traffic when turning.

High Collision Recommendations:

1. Install/Replace with New No U Turn [R3-4] Sign

2. Install Speed Limit Sign (40) [R2-1]

3. Install/Repaint Traffic Striping

4. Install Type IV (R) Pavement Arrow Marking

5. Install Type VII (L) Pavement Arrow Marking
FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 61

8.1.3 State Intersection 3: Big Bear Blvd (SR-18) & Lakeview Dr Table 9: Intersection 3 Number of Collisions and Corresponding Primary Collision Factor Number of Collisions Primary Collision Factor
5 Unsafe Speeds
2 Unknown
1 Improper Turning
Total 8
Pattern: Motorists are not maintaining safe speeds at this curved intersection.

High Collision Recommendations:

1. Install Two-Direction Large Arrow (W1-7) Sign and Object Marker [N-1] (CA)

2. Install “Cross Traffic Does Not Stop” (W4-4P) Sign

8.1.4 State Intersection 4: Big Bear Blvd (SR-18) & Thrush Dr Table 10: Intersection 4 Number of Collisions and Corresponding Primary Collision Factor Number of Collisions Primary Collision Factor
2 Unsafe Speed
2 Automobile Right of Way
1 Traffic Signals & Signs
1 Unknown
Total 6
Pattern: Motorists are travelling at unsafe speeds and drivers entering oncoming traffic are not properly yielding.

High Collision Recommendations:

1. Install Speed Limit Sign (40) [R2-1]

2. Install “Cross Traffic Does Not Stop” (W4-4P) Sign

8.1.5 State Intersection 5: Big Bear Blvd (SR-18) & Stanfield Cutoff Table 11: Intersection 5 Number of Collisions and Corresponding Primary Collision Factor Number of Collisions Primary Collision Factor
2 Improper Turning
2 Following Too Closely
1 Unsafe Lane Change
Total 5
Pattern: Motorists are not maintaining safe speeds and are turning improperly from previous road segments.

High Collision Recommendations:

1. Modify Signal Phasing to Implement a Leading Pedestrian Interval

2. Install Pavement Crosswalk Marking (Ladder)
FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 62

8.1.6 State Intersection 6: Big Bear Blvd (SR-18) & Georgia St Table 12: Intersection 6 Number of Collisions and Corresponding Primary Collision Factor Number of Collisions Primary Collision Factor
4 Traffic Signals & Signs
Total 4
Pattern: Motorists failed to yield to oncoming traffic when turning left.

High Collision Recommendations:

1. Replace/Install With [SR39A] (CA) Sign

2. Install (R10-12) Sign

3. Install [SR4-1] (CA) Sign

4. Modify Signal Phasing to Implement a Leading Pedestrian Interval

5. Install Type IV (L) Pavement Arrow Marking

6. Install Type VII (R) Pavement Arrow Marking

7. Remove Pavement Arrow Marking

8.1.7 State Intersection 7: Big Bear Blvd (SR-18) & Fox Farm Rd Table 13: Intersection 7 Number of Collisions and Corresponding Primary Collision Factor Number of Collisions Primary Collision Factor
2 Unsafe Speed
1 Traffic Signals & Signs
1 Improper Turning
Total 4
Pattern: Motorists are travelling at unsafe speeds at the intersection and have resulted in 2 rear end collisions.

High Collision Recommendations:

1. Install (R10-12) Sign

2. Install Type IV (L) Pavement Arrow Marking

3. Install Type VII (R) Pavement Arrow Marking

4. Install/Repaint Intersection Traffic Striping

5. Install [SW4-1] (CA) Sign

6. Install Flashing Beacon as Advance Warning

8.1.8 State Intersection 8: Big Bear Blvd (SR-18) & Division Dr Table 14: Intersection 8 Number of Collisions and Corresponding Primary Collision Factor Number of Collisions Primary Collision Factor
2 Traffic Signals & Signs
2 Unsafe Speed
Total 4
Pattern: Motorists are not yielding to oncoming traffic properly and are travelling at unsafe speeds.

High Collision Recommendations:

1. Replace/Install (R10-12) Sign

2. Install/Repaint Intersection Traffic Striping
FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 63

8.1.9 State Intersection 9: Big Bear Blvd (SR-18) & Cienega Rd Table 15: Intersection 9 Number of Collisions and Corresponding Primary Collision Factor Number of Collisions Primary Collision Factor
2 Automobile Right of Way
1 Unsafe Speeds
1 Improper Passing
Total 4
Pattern: Motorists are travelling at unsafe speeds and drivers entering cross traffic are not properly yielding.

High Collision Recommendations:

1. Install “Cross Traffic Does Not Stop” (W4-4P) Sign

2. Install Flashing Beacon as Advance Warning

3. Install Type IV (R) Pavement Arrow Marking

4. Install/Repaint Intersection Traffic Striping

5. Install/Repaint Pavement Word Marking

8.1.10 State Intersection 10: Big Bear Blvd (SR-18) & Knight Ave Table 16: Intersection 10 Number of Collisions and Corresponding Primary Collision Factor Number of Collisions Primary Collision Factor
1 Automobile Right of Way
1 Pedestrian Violation
1 Lights
Total 3
Pattern: Motorists are not yielding to cross traffic properly.

High Collision Recommendations:

1. Install “Cross Traffic Does Not Stop” (W4-4P) Sign

2. Repaint Intersection Traffic Striping

3. Repaint Pavement Word Marking

4. Repaint Pavement Arrow Marking

5. Repaint Pavement Symbol Marking
FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 64

8.2 High Collision Local Intersections
High collision intersections are critical intersections that require the most analytical focus since it is anticipated that many collisions will occur within a high collision intersection based on its crash history. Table 17 displays the ten (10) most prominent local intersections in terms of number of collisions in the City of Big Bear Lake. Table 18 displays the ten (10) most prominent local intersections with their ranking methodology.

Table 17: List of High Collision Intersections on Local Roadway Intersection
Identification
Number*
Intersection
Ranking
Number
Intersection Control Number of
Collisions**
1 1 Lahontan Dr Mountainaire Ln Unsignalized 3
2 2 Moonridge Rd Elm St Unsignalized 3
3 3 Starvation Flats Rd Fox Farm Rd Unsignalized 2
4 4 Tehama Dr Moonridge Rd Unsignalized 2
5 4 Moonridge Rd Brownie Ln Unsignalized 2
6 4 Village Dr Pine Knot Ave Unsignalized 2
7 7 Pedder Rd Pine Knot Ave Unsignalized 2
8 7 Brownie Ln Thrush Dr Unsignalized 2
9 7 Crestwood Dr Evergreen Dr Unsignalized 2
10 10 Menlo Dr Butte Ave Unsignalized 1
* Intersection Identification Number is merely an identification method utilized to avoid confusion with the Intersection Ranking Number.
**Total Number of Collisions during the 5-year period between January 1, 2017 and December 31, 2021.

Table 18: Intersection Number of Collisions and Ranking in the City of Big Bear Lake Intersection
Ranking
Number*
Intersection
Number of
Collisions*
Collision Severity
Killed Severe
Injury
Visible
Injury
Possible
Injury
Property
Damage
Only
1 Lahontan Dr Mountainaire Ln 3 0 0 2 0 1
2 Moonridge Rd Elm St 3 0 0 0 1 2
3 Starvation Flats Rd Fox Farm Rd 2 0 0 1 1 0
4 Tehama Dr Moonridge Rd 2 0 0 0 1 1
4 Moonridge Rd Brownie Ln 2 0 0 0 1 1
4 Village Dr Pine Knot Ave 2 0 0 0 1 1
7 Pedder Rd Pine Knot Ave 2 0 0 0 0 2
7 Brownie Ln Thrush Dr 2 0 0 0 0 2
7 Crestwood Dr Evergreen Dr 2 0 0 0 0 2
10 Menlo Dr Butte Ave 1 1 0 0 0 0
* Total Number of Collisions during the 5-year period between January 1, 2017 and December 31, 2021.

8.2.1 Local Intersection 1: Lahontan Dr & Mountainaire Ln Table 19: Intersection 1 Number of Collisions and Corresponding Primary Collision Factor Number of Collisions Primary Collision Factor
2 Automobile Right of Way
1 Unsafe Speeds
Total 3
Pattern: Motorists are not yielding to cross traffic properly.

High Collision Recommendations:

1. Install “Cross Traffic Does Not Stop” (W4-4P) Sign

8.2.2 Local Intersection 2: Moonridge Rd & Elm St
Table 20: Intersection 2 Number of Collisions and Corresponding Primary Collision Factor Number of Collisions Primary Collision Factor
2 Automobile Right of Way
1 Unsafe Lane Change
Total 3
Pattern: Motorists are not yielding to cross traffic properly.

High Collision Recommendations:

1. N/A, due to Moonridge Corridor Project Ongoing/Completed Construction in Oct. 2022

8.2.3 Local Intersection 3: Starvation Flats Rd & Fox Farm Rd Table 21: Intersection 3 Number of Collisions and Corresponding Primary Collision Factor Number of Collisions Primary Collision Factor
1 Improper Turning
1 Unsafe Speeds
Total 2
Pattern: Motorists are not maintaining safe speeds and are turning improperly at the intersection.

High Collision Recommendations:

1. Install "Cross Traffic Does Not Stop" (W4-4P) Sign

2. Repaint Intersection Traffic Striping

3. Repaint Pavement Word Marking
FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 66

8.2.4 Local Intersection 4: Tehama Dr & Moonridge Rd
Table 22: Intersection 4 Number of Collisions and Corresponding Primary Collision Factor Number of Collisions Primary Collision Factor
1 Unsafe Speeds
1 Unknown
Total 2
Pattern: Motorists are not maintaining safe speeds.

High Collision Recommendations:

1. Install "Cross Traffic Does Not Stop" (W4-4P) Sign

2. Restripe Intersection Traffic Striping

8.2.5 Local Intersection 5: Moonridge Rd & Brownie Ln
Table 23: Intersection 5 Number of Collisions and Corresponding Primary Collision Factor Number of Collisions Primary Collision Factor
1 Automobile Right of Way
1 Unknown
Total 2
Pattern: Motorists are not yielding to cross traffic properly.

High Collision Recommendations:

1. Install "Cross Traffic Does Not Stop" (W4-4P) Sign.

2. Remove [R26] (CA) Sign

3. Repaint Pavement Word Marking

4. Install/Repaint Intersection Traffic Striping

5. Install Pavement Word Marking

6. Install Type I Pavement Arrow M Repaint Intersection Pavement Marking

8.2.6 Local Intersection 6: Village Dr & Pine Knot Ave
Table 24: Intersection 6 Number of Collisions and Corresponding Primary Collision Factor Number of Collisions Primary Collision Factor
1 Improper Turning
1 Unsafe Speeds
Total 2
Pattern: Motorists are not maintaining safe speeds and are improperly turning.

High Collision Recommendations:

1. Repaint Pavement Word Marking

2. Repaint Intersection Traffic Striping
FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 67

8.2.7 Local Intersection 7: Pedder Rd & Pine Knot Ave
Table 25: Intersection 7 Number of Collisions and Corresponding Primary Collision Factor Number of Collisions Primary Collision Factor
1 Unsafe Speed
1 Improper Turning
Total 2
Pattern: Motorists are not maintaining safe speeds and are turning improperly at the intersection.

High Collision Recommendations:

1. Install "Cross Traffic Does Not Stop" (W4-4P) Sign.

2. Repaint Pavement Word Marking

3. Repaint Intersection Traffic Striping

8.2.8 Local Intersection 8: Brownie Ln & Thrush Dr
Table 26: Intersection 8 Number of Collisions and Corresponding Primary Collision Factor Number of Collisions Primary Collision Factor
2 Automobile Right of Way
Total 2
Pattern: Motorists are not yielding to oncoming traffic High Collision Recommendations:

1. Install "Cross Traffic Does Not Stop" (W4-4P) Sign

2. Repaint Pavement Word Marking

3. Restripe Intersection Traffic Striping

4. Repaint Pavement Symbol Marking

8.2.9 Local Intersection 9: Crestwood Dr & Evergreen Dr Table 27: Intersection 9 Number of Collisions and Corresponding Primary Collision Factor Number of Collisions Primary Collision Factor
1 Automobile Right of Way
1 Not Stated
Total 2
Pattern: Motorists are not yielding to oncoming traffic High Collision Recommendations:

1. Repaint Intersection Pavement Word Marking

2. Restripe Intersection Traffic Striping
FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 68

8.2.10 Local Intersection 10: Menlo Dr & Butte Ave
Table 28: Intersection 10 Number of Collisions and Corresponding Primary Collision Factor Number of Collisions Primary Collision Factor
1 Traffic Signals & Signs
Total 1
Pattern: Bicyclist are not obeying existing traffic signs High Collision Recommendations:

1. Install "Cross Traffic Does Not Stop" (W4-4P) Sign

2. Repaint Pavement Word Marking

3. Repaint Intersection Traffic Striping
FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 69

8.3 High Collision State & Local Roadway Segments
High collision roadway segments are critical segments that require focus since it is anticipated that collisions will occur within a high collision roadway segment based on its crash history.

Table 29 displays the ten (10) most prominent roadway segments that includes State roadway segments [Big Bear Blvd (SR-18)] and local roadway segments in the City of Big Bear Lake.

Table 30 displays the ten (10) prominent roadway segments with their ranking methodology.

Table 29: List of High Collision State & Local Roadway Segments Roadway
Segment
Identification
Number*
Roadway
Segment
Ranking
Number**
Roadway Segment Number of
Collisions***
1 1 Big Bear Blvd (Stanfield Cutoff to Division Dr) 17
2 2 Big Bear Blvd (Sandalwood Dr to Starvation Flats Rd) 9 3 3 Big Bear Blvd (Fox Farm Rd to Lakeview Ctr) 7
4 4 Big Bear Blvd (Moonridge Wy to Catalina Rd) 5
5 5 Big Bear Blvd (Spruce Rd to Spruce Spur) 3
6 6 Moonridge Rd (Brownie Ln to Evergreen Dr) 3
7 7 Big Bear Blvd (Knickerbocker Rd to Alden Rd) 3
8 8 Big Bear Blvd (Wren Dr to Crane Dr) 3
9 9 Village Dr (Cottage Ln to Bartlett Rd) 2
10 9 Colusa Dr (Colusa Wy to Colusa Ln) 2
* Roadway Segment Identification Number is merely an identification method utilized to avoid confusion with the Roadway Segment Ranking Number.
** Roadway Segment Ranking Number is based on the number of collisions that occurred on a roadway segment. *** Total Number of Collisions during the 5-year period between January 1, 2017 and December 31, 2021.

Table 30: State & Local Roadway Segment Number of Collisions and Ranking in the City of Big Bear Lake
Roadway
Segment
Ranking
Number*
Roadway Segment Number
of
Collisions
**
Collision Severity
Killed Severe
Injury
Visible
Injury
Complaint
of Pain
Property
Damage
Only
1 Big Bear Blvd (Stanfield Cutoff to Division Dr) 17 0 1 4 7 5 2 Big Bear Blvd (Sandalwood Dr to Starvation Flats Rd) 9 0 1 3 2 3 3 Big Bear Blvd (Fox Farm Rd to Lakeview Ctr) 5 1 0 0 4 0 4 Big Bear Blvd (Moonridge Wy to Catalina Rd) 5 0 0 0 2 3 5 Big Bear Blvd (Spruce Rd to Spruce Spur) 3 0 1 1 1 0
6 Moonridge Rd (Brownie Ln to Evergreen Dr) 3 0 1 0 1 1 7 Big Bear Blvd (Knickerbocker Rd to Alden Rd) 3 0 0 1 2 0 8 Big Bear Blvd (Wren Dr to Crane Dr) 3 0 0 1 1 1
9 Village Dr (Cottage Ln to Bartlett Rd) 2 0 0 0 1 1
9 Colusa Dr (Colusa Wy to Colusa Ln) 2 0 0 0 1 1
* Roadway Segment Ranking Number is based on the number of collisions that occurred on a roadway segment. ** Total Number of Collisions during the 5-year period between January 1, 2017 and December 31, 2021.

8.3.1 Roadway Segment 1: Big Bear Blvd [SR-18] (from Stanfield Cutoff to Division Dr)
Table 31: Roadway Segment 1 Number of Collisions and Corresponding Primary Collision Factor Number of Collisions Primary Collision Factor
8 Unsafe Speed
3 Driving or Bicycling Under the Influence of Alcohol or Drug 2 Wrong Side of Road
2 Improper Turning
1 Improper Passing
1 Other Improper Driving
Total 17
Pattern: The motorists did not maintain proper safe speeds when making turns and have been under the influence.

High Collision Recommendations:

1. Install Centerline Rumble Strips

2. Repaint Edge-line Striping

3. Install Curve Advance Warning (W1-2L) Sign

4. Install Curve Advance Warning (W1-2R) Sign

8.3.2 Roadway Segment 2: Big Bear Blvd [SR-18] (Sandalwood Dr to Starvation Flats Rd)
Table 32: Roadway Segment 2 Number of Collisions and Corresponding Primary Collision Factor Number of Collisions Primary Collision Factor
3 Improper Turning
3 Automobile Right of Way
2 Unsafe Speed
1 Unknown
Total 9
Pattern: Motorists are turning improperly and not yielding to oncoming traffic.

High Collision Recommendations:

1. Install Curve Advance Warning (W1-2R) Sign

2. Install Curve Advance Warning (W1-2L) Sign

3. Install (W11-1) & (W16-1P) Sign
FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 71

8.3.3 Roadway Segment 3: Big Bear Blvd [SR-18] (from Fox Farm Rd to Lakeview Ctr)
Table 33: Roadway Segment 3 Number of Collisions and Corresponding Primary Collision Factor Number of Collisions Primary Collision Factor
4 Improper Turning
2 Unsafe Speed
1 Automobile Right of Way
1 Unsafe Starting or Backing
Total 8
Pattern: Motorists did not maintain proper safe speeds, are turning improperly, and not yielding to oncoming traffic.

High Collision Recommendations:

1. Install “Cross Traffic Does Not Stop” (W4-4P) Sign

2. Install Speed Limit [R2-1] (40) Sign

8.3.4 Roadway Segment 4: Big Bear Blvd [SR-18] (from Moonridge Wy to Catalina Rd)
Table 34: Roadway Segment 4 Number of Collisions and Corresponding Primary Collision Factor Number of Collisions Primary Collision Factor
3 Improper Turning
1 Unsafe Speed
Total 4
Pattern: Motorists are turning improperly and not maintaining proper speeds.

High Collision Recommendations:

1. Install “Cross Traffic Does Not Stop” (W4-4P) Sign

2. Install Speed Limit [R2-1] (40) Sign

8.3.5 Roadway Segment 5: Big Bear Blvd [SR-18] (from Spruce Rd to Spruce Spur)
Table 35: Roadway Segment 5 Number of Collisions and Corresponding Primary Collision Factor Number of Collisions Primary Collision Factor
2 Unsafe Speed
1 Not Stated
Total 3
Pattern: Motorists are not maintaining proper speeds.

High Collision Recommendations:

1. Install “Cross Traffic Does Not Stop” (W4-4P) Sign

2. Install Curve Advance Warning (W1-2R) Sign

3. Repaint Edge-line Striping
FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 72

8.3.6 Roadway Segment 6: Moonridge Rd (from Brownie Ln to Evergreen Dr) Table 36: Roadway Segment 6 Number of Collisions and Corresponding Primary Collision Factor Number of Collisions Primary Collision Factor
2 Unsafe Speed
1 Driving or Bicycling Under the Influence of Alcohol or Drug Total 3
Pattern: Motorists are not maintaining proper speeds.

High Collision Recommendations:

1. Install “Cross Traffic Does Not Stop” (W4-4P) Sign

2. Repaint Centerline Striping

3. Repaint Laneline Striping

8.3.7 Roadway Segment 7: Big Bear Blvd [SR-18] (from Knickerbocker Rd to Alden Rd)
Table 37: Roadway Segment 7 Number of Collisions and Corresponding Primary Collision Factor Number of Collisions Primary Collision Factor
3 Improper Turning
Total 3
Pattern: Motorists are turning improperly.

High Collision Recommendations:

1. Install “Cross Traffic Does Not Stop” (W4-4P) Sign

2. Install Speed Limit [R2-1] (35) Sign

8.3.8 Roadway Segment 8: Big Bear Blvd [SR-18] (from Wren Dr to Crane Dr) Table 38: Roadway Segment 8 Number of Collisions and Corresponding Primary Collision Factor Number of Collisions Primary Collision Factor
1 Automobile Right of Way
2 Unknown
Total 3
Pattern: This collision occurred as a result of a motorist no giving the proper right of way towards the oncoming traffic.

High Collision Recommendations:

1. Install “Cross Traffic Does Not Stop” (W4-4P) Sign

2. Install Speed Limit [R2-1] (40) Sign
FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 73

8.3.9 Roadway Segment 9: Village Dr (from Cottage Ln to Bartlett Rd) Table 39: Roadway Segment 9 Number of Collisions and Corresponding Primary Collision Factor Number of Collisions Primary Collision Factor
1 Unsafe Speed
1 Driving or Bicycling Under the Influence of Alcohol or Drug 1 Unsafe Starting or Backing
Total 3
Pattern: This collision occurred as a result of speeding and not giving enough space between the vehicle in front.

High Collision Recommendations:

1. Install “Cross Traffic Does Not Stop” (W4-4P) Sign

2. Install (W11-1) & (W16-7PL) Sign

8.3.10 Roadway Segment 10: Colusa Dr (from Colusa Wy to Colusa Ln) Table 40: Roadway Segment 10 Number of Collisions and Corresponding Primary Collision Factor Number of Collisions Primary Collision Factor
2 Unsafe Speed
Total 2
Pattern: Motorists did not maintain proper safe speeds.

High Collision Recommendations:

1. Install Curve Advance Warning (W1-2L) Sign

2. Install “Watch Downhill Speed” [SW4-1] (CA) Sign

3. Install Centerline Striping
FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 74

9. Collision Diagrams, Preliminary Conceptual Plans for Recommended Improvements at High Collision Intersections and High Collision Roadway Segments, Cost Estimates, and Benefit Cost Ratios
At each of the aforementioned high collision intersections and roadway segments, the collision patterns have been evaluated and countermeasures to those patterns have been developed through a preliminary conceptual plan and the preliminary cost of those measures has been estimated. This section of this report summarizes those results.

This Local Safety Plan is funded through a Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) grant from the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). HSIP grant funding is prioritized and awarded based on the grant funding's economic effectiveness, which is established by a benefit to cost ratio. Under the HSIP Cycle 11 call for projects, the minimum Benefit to Cost Ratio is 3.5. A summary of the benefit to cost ratios is provided in this section. Project cost estimates, as of October 17, 2022, are calculated on a line-item basis using the Caltrans Contract Cost Database. In some cases, recent construction bids and benefit values are calculated based on Caltrans established countermeasure values. A summation of the total construction cost as of October 27, 2022, of all intersections and road segments are displayed at the end of the report.

Depending on the City’s priorities, it is highly recommended that multiple projects as provided below are grouped into one HSIP application to maximize potential funding allocations.

9.1 High Collision Intersections

9.1.1 State Intersection 1: Big Bear Blvd (SR-18) & Sandalwood Dr Figure 25: State Intersection 1 Crash Diagram- 8 Collisions (January 1, 2017 - December 31, 2021)
Source: University of California, Berkeley Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS) *Collision Locations are approximate due to the size and overlapping of collisions Mapping Summary:

Fatal Crash 0
Injury Crash 4
PDO Crash 4
Total 8
FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 76
FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 77

9.1.1.1 State Intersection 1 Cost Estimate and Cost/Benefit Analysis Construction Cost Estimate:

The following table represents the preliminary line-item cost for the proposed countermeasures.

Line-item costs are derived from the Caltrans contract cost database for District 8 as of October 17, 2022.

Table 41: State Intersection 1 Cost Estimate
Total Cost and Benefit:

The project’s total cost is estimated at $2,760 which does not include the design and engineering costs. The estimated benefit of these improvements is $343,574 based on the Highway Safety Benefit-Cost Analysis Model (Version 2.0). The resulting Benefit-Cost ratio is 124.48.

The HSIP Cycle 11 program has a required minimum B/C ratio (BCR) of 3.5 for a BCR Application. With a B/C ratio of 124.48, the proposed intersection improvement project is eligible for HSIP funding and is considered a competitive HSIP project.

Itemized Benefits
Safety $342,267
Travel Time $1,185
Vehicle Operating Cost $117
Emissions $6
Total Benefits $343,574
Summary of Total Cost & Benefit
Present Value Costs ($ Dollars) $2,760
Present Value Benefits ($ Dollars) $343,574
Net Present Value ($ Dollars) $340,814
Benefit / Cost Ratio 124.48
HSIP Funding Eligibility
1 Install "Cross Traffic Does Not Stop" Sign [W4-4P] EA 2 $ 575.00 $ 1,150.00 90% 2 Install Speed Limit Sign (40MPH) [R2-1] EA 2 $ 575.00 $ 1,150.00 90% $ 2,300.00
100%
* Non-signalized Countermeasure Identification of Local Roadway Safety Manual (Version 1.6, April 2022) 20% $ 460.00
No. Item Description Unit Quantity Unit Cost
Contingencies percentage of the aforementioned Total Construction Cost:

Total Construction Cost (Including Contingencies): $ 2,760.00

LRSM CM
No. (NS06)*
Total
Total
**OS: Other Safety-Related Improvements
Total Construction Cost: $ 2,300.00
Weighted Average (%)
FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 78

9.1.2 State Intersection 2: Big Bear Blvd (SR-18) & Summit Blvd Figure 26: State Intersection 2 Crash Diagram- 8 Collisions (January 1, 2017 - December 31, 2021)
Source: University of California, Berkeley Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS) *Collision Locations are approximate due to the size and overlapping of collisions Big Bear Blvd (SR-18)
Mapping Summary:

Fatal Crash 0
Injury Crash 2
PDO Crash 6
Total 8
Summit Blvd
FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 79
FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 80

9.1.2.1 State Intersection 2 Cost Estimate and Cost/Benefit Analysis Construction Cost Estimate:

The following table represents the preliminary line-item cost for the proposed countermeasures.

Line-item costs are derived from the Caltrans contract cost database for District 8 as of October 17, 2022.

Table 42: State Intersection 2 Cost Estimate

Total Cost and Benefit:

The project’s total cost is estimated at $3,905 which does not include the design and engineering costs. The estimated benefit of these improvements is $118,010 based on the Highway Safety Benefit-Cost Analysis Model (Version 2.0). The resulting Benefit-Cost ratio is

30.22. The HSIP Cycle 11 program has a required minimum B/C ratio (BCR) of 3.5 for a BCR Application. With a B/C ratio of 30.22, the proposed intersection improvement project is eligible for HSIP funding and is considered a competitive HSIP project.

Itemized Benefits
Safety $117,226
Travel Time $712
Vehicle Operating Cost $68
Emissions $4
Total Benefits $118,010
Summary of Total Cost & Benefit
Present Value Costs ($ Dollars) $3,905
Present Value Benefits ($ Dollars) $118,010
Net Present Value ($ Dollars) $114,105
Benefit / Cost Ratio 30.22
1 Install/Replace with New No U Turn [R3-4] Sign EA 2 $ 575.00 $ 1,150.00 90% 2 Install speed limit 40mph [R2-1] EA 1 $ 575.00 $ 575.00 90% 3 Install/Repaint Traffic Striping LF 101 3.50 $ $ 353.50 90% 4 Install Type IV (R) Pavement Arrow Marking SQFT 30 14.00 $ $ 420.00 90% 5 Install Type VII (L) Pavement Arrow Marking SQFT 54 14.00 $ $ 756.00 90% $ 3,254.50
100% 10.9% 89.1%
* Signalized Countermeasure Identification of Local Roadway Safety Manual (Version 1.6, April 2022) 20%
OS**
HSIP Funding Eligibility
$ 3,254.50
$ 3,905.40
$ 650.90
No. Item Description Unit Quantity Unit Cost
Contingencies percentage of the afroementioned Total Construction Cost Total Construction Cost (Including Contingencies):

LRSM CM
No. (S09)*
Total
Weighted Average (%)
**OS: Other Safety-Related Improvements
Total Construction Cost:

Total
FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 81

9.1.3 State Intersection 3: Big Bear Blvd (SR-18) & Lakeview Dr Figure 27: State Intersection 3 Crash Diagram- 8 Collisions (January 1, 2017 - December 31, 2021)
Source: University of California, Berkeley Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS) *Collision Locations are approximate due to the size and overlapping of collisions Mapping Summary:

Fatal Crash 0
Injury Crash 1
PDO Crash 7
Total 8
FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 82
FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 83

9.1.3.1 State Intersection 3 Cost Estimate and Cost/Benefit Analysis Construction Cost Estimate:

The following table represents the preliminary line-item cost for the proposed countermeasures.

Line-item costs are derived from the Caltrans contract cost database for District 8 as of October 17, 2022.

Table 43: State Intersection 3 Cost Estimate
Total Cost and Benefit:

The project’s total cost is estimated at $4,000 which does not include the design and engineering costs. The estimated benefit of these improvements is $93,736 based on the Highway Safety Benefit-Cost Analysis Model (Version 2.0). The resulting Benefit-Cost ratio is

33.96. The HSIP Cycle 11 program has a required minimum B/C ratio (BCR) of 3.5 for a BCR Application. With a B/C ratio of 33.96, the proposed intersection improvement project is eligible for HSIP funding and is considered a competitive HSIP project.

Itemized Benefits
Safety $92,626
Travel Time $1,009
Vehicle Operating Cost $94
Emissions $6
Total Benefits $93,736
Summary of Total Cost & Benefit
Present Value Costs ($ Dollars) $2,760
Present Value Benefits ($ Dollars) $93,736
Net Present Value ($ Dollars) $90,976
Benefit / Cost Ratio 33.96
HSIP Funding
Eligibility
1 Install Two-Direction Large Arrow [W1-7] Sign and Object Marker [N-1 (CA)] EA 1 $ 1,150.00 $ 1,150.00 90% 2 Install "Cross Traffic Does Not Stop" [W4-4P] Sign EA 2 $ 575.00 $ 1,150.00 90% $ 2,300.00
100% 100.0%
* Non-Signalized Countermeasure Identification of Local Roadway Safety Manual (Version 1.6, April 2022) 20% $ 460.00
**OS: Other Safety-Related Improvements
No. Item Description Unit Quantity Unit Cost LRSM CM
No. (NS06)*
Total
Weighted Average (%)
Total
Total Construction Cost:

Contingencies percentage of the aforementioned Total Construction Cost:

Total Construction Cost (Including Contingencies):
$ 2,300.00
$ 2,760.00
FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 84

9.1.4 State Intersection 4: Big Bear Blvd (SR-18) & Thrush Dr Figure 28: State Intersection 4 Crash Diagram- 6 Collisions (January 1, 2017 - December 31, 2021)
Source: University of California, Berkeley Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS) *Collision Locations are approximate due to the size and overlapping of collisions Thrush Dr Big Bear Blvd (SR-18)
Mapping Summary:

Fatal Crash 0
Injury Crash 2
PDO Crash 4
Total 6
FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 85
FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 86

9.1.4.1 State Intersection 4 Cost Estimate and Cost/Benefit Analysis Construction Cost Estimate:

The following table represents the preliminary line-item cost for the proposed countermeasures.

Line-item costs are derived from the Caltrans contract cost database for District 8 as of October 17, 2022.

Table 44: State Intersection 4 Cost Estimate

Total Cost and Benefit:

The project’s total cost is estimated at $2,760 which does not include the design and engineering costs. The estimated benefit of these improvements is $166,262 based on the Highway Safety Benefit-Cost Analysis Model (Version 2.0). The resulting Benefit-Cost ratio is

60.24. The HSIP Cycle 11 program has a required minimum B/C ratio (BCR) of 3.5 for a BCR Application. With a B/C ratio of 60.24, the proposed intersection improvement project is eligible for HSIP funding and is considered a competitive HSIP project.

Itemized Benefits
Safety $165,346
Travel Time $830
Vehicle Operating Cost $80
Emissions $6
Total Benefits $166,262
Summary of Total Cost & Benefit
Present Value Costs ($ Dollars) $2,760
Present Value Benefits ($ Dollars) $166,262
Net Present Value ($ Dollars) $163,502
Benefit / Cost Ratio 60.24
HSIP Funding Eligibility
1 Install Speed Limit Sign (40) [R2-1] EA 2 $ 575.00 $ 1,150.00 90% 2 Install "Cross Traffic Does Not Stop" [W4-4P] Sign EA 2 $ 575.00 $ 1,150.00 90% $ 2,300.00
100% 100.0%
* Non-signalized Countermeasure Identification of Local Roadway Safety Manual (Version 1.6, April 2022) 20% $ 460.00

LRSM CM
No. (NS06)*
**OS: Other Safety-Related Improvements
Contingencies percentage of the aforementioned Total Construction Cost:

No. Item Description Unit Quantity Unit Cost Total
$ 2,760.00
Total
Weighted Average (%)
Total Construction Cost: $ 2,300.00
Total Construction Cost (Including Contingencies):

9.1.5 State Intersection 5: Big Bear Blvd (SR-18) & Stanfield Cutoff Figure 29: State Intersection 5 Crash Diagram- 5 Collisions (January 1, 2017 - December 31, 2021)
Source: University of California, Berkeley Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS) *Collision Locations are approximate due to the size and overlapping of collisions Mapping Summary:

Fatal Crash 0
Injury Crash 2
PDO Crash 3
Total 5
FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 88
FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 89

9.1.5.1 State Intersection 5 Cost Estimate and Cost/Benefit Analysis Construction Cost Estimate:

The following table represents the preliminary line-item cost for the proposed countermeasures.

Line-item costs are derived from the Caltrans contract cost database for District 8 as of October 17, 2022.

Table 45: State Intersection 5 Cost Estimate
Total Cost and Benefit:

The project’s total cost is estimated at $18,316 which does not include the design and engineering costs. The estimated benefit of these improvements is $643,544 based on the Highway Safety Benefit-Cost Analysis Model (Version 2.0). The resulting Benefit-Cost ratio is

35.14. The HSIP Cycle 11 program has a required minimum B/C ratio (BCR) of 3.5 for a BCR Application. With a B/C ratio of 35.14, the proposed intersection improvement project is eligible for HSIP funding and is considered a competitive HSIP project.

Itemized Benefits
Safety $640,398
Travel Time $2,845
Vehicle Operating Cost $277
Emissions $23
Total Benefits $643,544
Summary of Total Cost & Benefit
Present Value Costs ($ Dollars) $18,316
Present Value Benefits ($ Dollars) $643,544
Net Present Value ($ Dollars) $625,228
Benefit / Cost Ratio 35.14
1 Modify Signal Phasing to Implement a Leading Pedestrian Interval LS 1 $ 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00 90% 2 Install Pavement Crosswalk Marking (Ladder) SQFT 876 14.00 $ $ 12,264.00 90% $ 15,264.00
100% 19.7% 80.3%
* Signalized Countermeasure Identification of Local Roadway Safety Manual (Version 1.6, April 2022) 20%
No. Item Description Unit Quantity Unit Cost
HSIP Funding Eligibility

LRSM CM
No. (S21PB)*
Total
Weighted Average (%)
**OS: Other Safety-Related Improvements
Total
Contingencies percentage of the aforementioned Total Construction Cost:

Total Construction Cost (Including Contingencies):

LRSM CM
No. (S18PB)*
Total Construction Cost: $ 15,264.00
$ 3,052.80
$ 18,316.80
FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 90

9.1.6 State Intersection 6: Big Bear Blvd (SR-18) & Georgia St Figure 30: State Intersection 6 Crash Diagram- 4 Collisions (January 1, 2017 - December 31, 2021)
Source: University of California, Berkeley Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS) *Collision Locations are approximate due to the size and overlapping of collisions Georgia St Big Bear Blvd (SR-18)
Mapping Summary:

Fatal Crash 0
Injury Crash 4
PDO Crash 0
Total 4
FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 91
FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 92

9.1.6.1 State Intersection 6 Cost Estimate and Cost/Benefit Analysis Construction Cost Estimate:

The following table represents the preliminary line-item cost for the proposed countermeasures.

Line-item costs are derived from the Caltrans contract cost database for District 8 as of October 17, 2022.

Table 46: State Intersection 6 Cost Estimate
Total Cost and Benefit:

The project’s total cost is estimated at $27,847 which does not include the design and engineering costs. The estimated benefit of these improvements is $1,027,834 based on the Highway Safety Benefit-Cost Analysis Model (Version 2.0). The resulting Benefit-Cost ratio is

36.91. The HSIP Cycle 11 program has a required minimum B/C ratio (BCR) of 3.5 for a BCR Application. With a B/C ratio of 36.91, the proposed intersection improvement project is eligible for HSIP funding and is considered a competitive HSIP project.

Itemized Benefits
Safety $1,024,632
Travel Time $2,838
Vehicle Operating Cost $295
Emissions $69
Total Benefits $1,027,834
Summary of Total Cost & Benefit
Present Value Costs ($ Dollars) $27,847
Present Value Benefits ($ Dollars) $1,027,834
Net Present Value ($ Dollars) $999,987
Benefit / Cost Ratio 36.91
1 Replace/Install with [SR39A] (CA) Sign EA 2 $ 575.00 $ 1,150.00 2 Install [R10-12] Sign EA 2 $ 575.00 $ 1,150.00
3 Repaint intersection Traffic Striping LF 640 3.50 $ $ 2,240.00 4 Modify Signal Phasing to Implement a Leading Pedestrian Interval LS 1 $ 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00 90% 5 Install Type IV (L) Pavement Arrow Marking SQFT 105 14.00 $ $ 1,470.00 6 Install Type IV (R) Pavement Arrow Marking SQFT 30 14.00 $ $ 420.00 8 Install Pavement Crosswalk Marking (Ladder) SQFT 984 14.00 $ $ 13,776.00 90% $ 23,206.00
100% 12.9% 59.4% 27.7%
* Signalized Countermeasure Identification of Local Roadway Safety Manual (Version 1.6, April 2022) 20%
No. Item Description Unit Quantity Unit Cost
Contingencies percentage of the aforementioned Total Construction Cost Total Construction Cost (Including Contingencies):

LRSM CM
No. (S21PB)*
Total
Weighted Average (%)
**OS: Other Safety-Related Improvements
Total Construction Cost:

Total
$ 23,206.00
$ 4,641.20
$ 27,847.20
OS**
HSIP Funding Eligibility

LRSM CM
No. (S17PB)*
FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 93

9.1.7 State Intersection 7: Big Bear Blvd (SR-18) & Fox Farm Rd Figure 31: State Intersection 7 Crash Diagram- 4 Collisions (January 1, 2017 - December 31, 2021)
Source: University of California, Berkeley Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS) *Collision Locations are approximate due to the size and overlapping of collisions Mapping Summary:

Fatal Crash 0
Injury Crash 1
PDO Crash 3
Total 4
FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 94
FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 95

9.1.7.1 State Intersection 7 Cost Estimate and Cost/Benefit Analysis Construction Cost Estimate:

The following table represents the preliminary line-item cost for the proposed countermeasures.

Line-item costs are derived from the Caltrans contract cost database for District 8 as of October 17, 2022.

Table 47: State Intersection 7 Cost Estimate
Total Cost and Benefit:

The project’s total cost is estimated at $3,379 which does not include the design and engineering costs. The estimated benefit of these improvements is $48,153 based on the Highway Safety Benefit-Cost Analysis Model (Version 2.0). The resulting Benefit-Cost ratio is

14.25. The HSIP Cycle 11 program has a required minimum B/C ratio (BCR) of 3.5 for a BCR Application. With a B/C ratio of 14.25, the proposed intersection improvement project is eligible for HSIP funding and is considered a competitive HSIP project.

Itemized Benefits
Safety $47,760
Travel Time $356
Vehicle Operating Cost $34
Emissions $4
Total Benefits $48,153
Summary of Total Cost & Benefit
Present Value Costs ($ Dollars) $3,379
Present Value Benefits ($ Dollars) $48,153
Net Present Value ($ Dollars) $44,774
Benefit / Cost Ratio 14.25
1 Install [R10-12] Sign EA 2 $ 575.00 $ 1,150.00
2 Install Type IV (L) Pavement Arrow Marking SQFT 15 14.00 $ $ 210.00 3 Install Type VII (R) Pavement Arrow Marking SQFT 81 14.00 $ $ 1,134.00 4 Install/Repaint Intersection Traffic Striping LF 92 3.50 $ $ 322.00 90% $ 2,816.00
100% 11.4% 88.6%
* Signalized Countermeasure Identification of Local Roadway Safety Manual (Version 1.6, April 2022) 20%
OS**
HSIP Funding Eligibility
$ 2,816.00
$ 563.20
$ 3,379.20

LRSM CM
No. (S09)*
No. Item Description Unit Quantity Unit Cost
Contingencies percentage of the aforementioned Total Construction Cost Total Construction Cost (Including Contingencies):

Total
Weighted Average (%)
**OS: Other Safety-Related Improvements
Total Construction Cost:

9.1.8 State Intersection 8: Big Bear Blvd (SR-18) & Division Dr Figure 32: State Intersection 8 Crash Diagram- 4 Collisions (January 1, 2017 - December 31, 2021)
Source: University of California, Berkeley Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS) *Collision Locations are approximate due to the size and overlapping of collisions Division Dr Mapping Summary:

Fatal Crash 0
Injury Crash 1
PDO Crash 3
Total 4
FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 97
FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 98

9.1.8.1 State Intersection 8 Cost Estimate and Cost/Benefit Analysis Construction Cost Estimate:

The following table represents the preliminary line-item cost for the proposed countermeasures.

Line-item costs are derived from the Caltrans contract cost database for District 8 as of October 17, 2022.

Table 48: State Intersection 8 Cost Estimate
Total Cost and Benefit:

The project’s total cost is estimated at $4,046 which does not include the design and engineering costs. The estimated benefit of these improvements is $48,153 based on the Highway Safety Benefit-Cost Analysis Model (Version 2.0). The resulting Benefit-Cost ratio is

11.90. The HSIP Cycle 11 program has a required minimum B/C ratio (BCR) of 3.5 for a BCR Application. With a B/C ratio of 11.90, the proposed intersection improvement project is eligible for HSIP funding and is considered a competitive HSIP project.

Itemized Benefits
Safety $47,760
Travel Time $356
Vehicle Operating Cost $34
Emissions $4
Total Benefits $48,153
Summary of Total Cost & Benefit
Present Value Costs ($ Dollars) $4,046
Present Value Benefits ($ Dollars) $48,153
Net Present Value ($ Dollars) $44,107
Benefit / Cost Ratio 11.90
1 Replace/Install [R3-4] Sign EA 2 $ 575.00 $ 1,150.00
2 Install/Repaint Intersection Traffic Striping LF 634.8 3.50 $ $ 2,221.80 90% $ 3,371.80
100% 37%
* Signalized Countermeasure Identification of Local Roadway Safety Manual (Version 1.6, April 2022) 20%
$ 4,046.16

LRSM CM
No. (S09)*
No. Item Description Unit Quantity Unit Cost
Total Construction Cost (Including Contingencies):

Total
Weighted Average (%)
**OS: Other Safety-Related Improvements
Total Construction Cost:
63%
Contingencies percentage of the aforementioned Total Construction Cost Total
$ 3,371.80
$ 674.36
HSIP Funding Eligibility
OS **
FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 99

9.1.9 State Intersection 9: Big Bear Blvd (SR-18) & Cienega Rd Figure 33: State Intersection 9 Crash Diagram- 4 Collisions (January 1, 2017 - December 31, 2021)
Source: University of California, Berkeley Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS) *Collision Locations are approximate due to the size and overlapping of collisions Cienega Rd Big Bear Blvd (SR-18)
Mapping Summary:

Fatal Crash 0
Injury Crash 0
PDO Crash 4
Total 4
FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 100
FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 101

9.1.9.1 State Intersection 9 Cost Estimate and Cost/Benefit Analysis Construction Cost Estimate:

The following table represents the preliminary line-item cost for the proposed countermeasures.

Line-item costs are derived from the Caltrans contract cost database for District 8 as of October 17, 2022.

Table 49: State Intersection 9 Cost Estimate
Total Cost and Benefit:

The project’s total cost is estimated at $2,847 which does not include the design and engineering costs. The estimated benefit of these improvements is $41,084 based on the Highway Safety Benefit-Cost Analysis Model (Version 2.0). The resulting Benefit-Cost ratio is

14.43. The HSIP Cycle 11 program has a required minimum B/C ratio (BCR) of 3.5 for a BCR Application. With a B/C ratio of 14.43, the proposed intersection improvement project is eligible for HSIP funding and is considered a competitive HSIP project.

Itemized Benefits
Safety $40,093
Travel Time $908
Vehicle Operating Cost $83
Emissions $0
Total Benefits $41,084
Summary of Total Cost & Benefit
Present Value Costs ($ Dollars) $2,847
Present Value Benefits ($ Dollars) $41,084
Net Present Value ($ Dollars) $38,237
Benefit / Cost Ratio 14.43
1 Install "Cross Traffic Does Not Stop" [W4-4P] Sign EA 2 $ 575.00 $ 1,150.00 90% 2 Install Type IV (R) Pavement Arrow Marking SQFT 15 14.00 $ $ 210.00 90% 3 Install/Repaint Intersection Traffic Striping LF 113.3 3.50 $ $ 396.55 4 Install/Repaint Pavement Word Marking SQFT 44 14.00 $ $ 616.00 90% $ 2,372.55
100% 48.5% 34.8% 16.7%
* Non-signalized Countermeasure Identification of Local Roadway Safety Manual (Version 1.6, April 2022) 20%
No. Item Description Unit Quantity Unit Cost
$ 2,372.55
$ 474.51
$ 2,847.06

LRSM CM
No. (NS07)*
Contingencies percentage of the aforementioned Total Construction Cost Total Construction Cost (Including Contingencies):

LRSM CM
No. (NS06)*
Total
Weighted Average (%)
**OS: Other Safety-Related Improvements
Total Construction Cost:

Total
HSIP Funding Eligibility
OS**
FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 102

9.1.10 State Intersection 10: Big Bear Blvd (SR-18) & Knight Figure 34: State Intersection 10 Crash Diagram- 3 Collisions (January 1, 2017 - December 31, 2021)
Source: University of California, Berkeley Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS) *Collision Locations are approximate due to the size and overlapping of collisions Knight Ave Big Bear Blvd (SR-18)
Mapping Summary:

Fatal Crash 0
Injury Crash 2
PDO Crash 1
Total 3
FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 103
FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 104

9.1.10.1 State Intersection 10 Cost Estimate and Cost/Benefit Analysis Construction Cost Estimate:

The following table represents the preliminary line-item cost for the proposed countermeasures.

Line-item costs are derived from the Caltrans contract cost database for District 8 as of October 17, 2022.

Table 50: State Intersection 10 Cost Estimate
Total Cost and Benefit:

The project’s total cost is estimated at $1,209 which does not include the design and engineering costs. The estimated benefit of these improvements is $738,247 based on the Highway Safety Benefit-Cost Analysis Model (Version 2.0). The resulting Benefit-Cost ratio is 610.78.

The HSIP Cycle 11 program has a required minimum B/C ratio (BCR) of 3.5 for a BCR Application. With a B/C ratio of 610.78, the proposed intersection improvement project is eligible for HSIP funding and is considered a competitive HSIP project.

Itemized Benefits
Safety $737,251
Travel Time $905
Vehicle Operating Cost $91
Emissions $0
Total Benefits $738,247
Summary of Total Cost & Benefit
Present Value Costs ($ Dollars) $1,209
Present Value Benefits ($ Dollars) $738,247
Net Present Value ($ Dollars) $737,038
Benefit / Cost Ratio 610.78
1 Install "Cross Traffic Does Not Stop" [W4-4P] Sign EA 1 $ 575.00 $ 575.00 90% 2 Repaint Intersection Traffic Striping LF 19.5 3.50 $ $ 68.25 3 Repaint Pavement Word Marking SQFT 11 14.00 $ $ 154.00 90% 4 Repaint Pavement Arrow Marking SQFT 3.5 14.00 $ $ 49.00 90% 5 Repaint Pavement Symbol Marking SQFT 11.5 14.00 $ $ 161.00 90% $ 1,007.25
100% 36.1% 57.1% 6.8%
* Non-signalized Countermeasure Identification of Local Roadway Safety Manual (Version 1.6, April 2022) 20%
Total Construction Cost:

Contingencies percentage of the aforementioned Total Construction Cost Total Construction Cost (Including Contingencies):
$ 1,007.25
$ 201.45
$ 1,208.70

LRSM CM
No. (NS07)*

LRSM CM
No. (NS06)*
Total
Weighted Average (%)
Total
HSIP Funding Eligibility
OS**
**OS: Other Safety-Related Improvements
No. Item Description Unit Quantity Unit Cost
FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 105

9.2.1 Local Intersection 1: Lahontan Dr & Mountainaire Ln Figure 35: Local Intersection 1 Crash Diagram- 3 Collisions (January 1, 2017 - December 31, 2021)
Source: University of California, Berkeley Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS) *Collision Locations are approximate due to the size and overlapping of collisions Mountainaire Ln Lahontan Dr
Mapping Summary:

Fatal Crash 0
Injury Crash 2
PDO Crash 1
Total 3
FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 106
FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 107

9.2.1.1 Local Intersection 1 Cost Estimate and Cost/Benefit Analysis Construction Cost Estimate:

The following table represents the preliminary line-item cost for the proposed countermeasures.

Line-item costs are derived from the Caltrans contract cost database for District 8 as of October 17, 2022.

Table 51: Local Intersection 1 Cost Estimate
Total Cost and Benefit:

The project’s total cost is estimated at $1,380 which does not include the design and engineering costs. The estimated benefit of these improvements is $182,688 based on the Highway Safety Benefit-Cost Analysis Model (Version 2.0). The resulting Benefit-Cost ratio is 132.38.

The HSIP Cycle 11 program has a required minimum B/C ratio (BCR) of 3.5 for a BCR Application. With a B/C ratio of 132.38, the proposed intersection improvement project is eligible for HSIP funding and is considered a competitive HSIP project.

Itemized Benefits
Safety $182,167
Travel Time $474
Vehicle Operating Cost $48
Emissions $0
Total Benefits $182,688
Summary of Total Cost & Benefit
Present Value Costs ($ Dollars) $1,380
Present Value Benefits ($ Dollars) $182,688
Net Present Value ($ Dollars) $181,308
Benefit / Cost Ratio 132.38
HSIP Funding Eligibility
1 Install "Cross Traffic Does Not Stop" [W4-4P] Sign EA 2 $ 575.00 $ 1,150.00 90% $ 1,150.00
100% 100.0%
* Non-signalized Countermeasure Identification of Local Roadway Safety Manual (Version 1.6, April 2022) 20%
Total Construction Cost: $ 1,150.00
Contingencies percentage of the aforementioned Total Construction Cost: $ 230.00 Total Construction Cost (Including Contingencies): $ 1,380.00

LRSM CM
No. (NS06)*
Total
Weighted Average (%)
**OS: Other Safety-Related Improvements
No. Item Description Unit Quantity Unit Cost Total
FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 108

9.2.2 Local Intersection 2: Moonridge Rd & Elm St
Figure 36: Local Intersection 2 Crash Diagram- 3 Collisions (January 1, 2017 - December 31, 2021)
Source: University of California, Berkeley Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS) *Collision Locations are approximate due to the size and overlapping of collisions Elm St Mapping Summary:

Fatal Crash 0
Injury Crash 1
PDO Crash 2
Total 3
FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 109

9.2.2.1 Local Intersection 2 Cost Estimate and Cost/Benefit Analysis Due to the City’s improvement project on Moonridge Road and Elm Street intersection, therefore, the recommended safety countermeasures and benefit-cost-analysis will not be applied to this intersection.

Figure 37: Moonridge Rd & Elm St Intersection Improvement Project (October 2022) FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 110

9.2.3 Local Intersection 3: Starvation Flats Rd & Fox Farm Rd Figure 38: Local Intersection 3 Crash Diagram- 2 Collisions (January 1, 2017 - December 31, 2021)
Source: University of California, Berkeley Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS) *Collision Locations are approximate due to the size and overlapping of collisions Mapping Summary:

Fatal Crash 0
Injury Crash 2
PDO Crash 0
Total 2
FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 111
FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 112

9.2.3.1 Local Intersection 3 Cost Estimate and Cost/Benefit Analysis Construction Cost Estimate:

The following table represents the preliminary line-item cost for the proposed countermeasures.

Line-item costs are derived from the Caltrans contract cost database for District 8 as of October 17, 2022.

Table 52: Local Intersection 3 Cost Estimate
Total Cost and Benefit:

The project’s total cost is estimated at $6,311 which does not include the design and engineering costs. The estimated benefit of these improvements is $276,539 based on the Highway Safety Benefit-Cost Analysis Model (Version 2.0). The resulting Benefit-Cost ratio is 102.46.

The HSIP Cycle 11 program has a required minimum B/C ratio (BCR) of 3.5 for a BCR Application. With a B/C ratio of 102.46, the proposed intersection improvement project is eligible for HSIP funding and is considered a competitive HSIP project.

Itemized Benefits
Safety $275,780
Travel Time $678
Vehicle Operating Cost $70
Emissions $11
Total Benefits $276,539
Summary of Total Cost & Benefit
Present Value Costs ($ Dollars) $2,699
Present Value Benefits ($ Dollars) $276,539
Net Present Value ($ Dollars) $273,840
Benefit / Cost Ratio 102.46
1 Install "Cross Traffic Does Not Stop" [W4-4P] Sign EA 2 $ 575.00 1,150.00$ 90% 2 Repaint Intersection Traffic Striping LF 50 3.50 $ $ 175.00 3 Repaint Pavement Word Marking SQFT 66 14.00 $ $ 924.00 90% 2,249.00$
100% 41.1% 51.1% 7.8%
* Non-signalized Countermeasure Identification of Local Roadway Safety Manual (Version 1.6, April 2022) 20%
Total Construction Cost:

Contingencies percentage of the aforementioned Total Construction Cost:

Total Construction Cost (Including Contingencies):
$ 2,249.00
$ 449.80
$ 2,698.80

LRSM CM
No. (NS07)*

9.2.4 Local Intersection 4: Tehama Dr & Moonridge Rd
Figure 39: Local Intersection 4 Crash Diagram- 2 Collisions (January 1, 2017 - December 31, 2021)
Source: University of California, Berkeley Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS) *Collision Locations are approximate due to the size and overlapping of collisions Mapping Summary:

Fatal Crash 0
Injury Crash 0
PDO Crash 2
Total 2
FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 114
FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 115

9.2.4.1 Local Intersection 4 Cost Estimate and Cost/Benefit Analysis Construction Cost Estimate:

The following table represents the preliminary line-item cost for the proposed countermeasures.

Line-item costs are derived from the Caltrans contract cost database for District 8 as of October 17, 2022.

Table 53: Local Intersection 4 Cost Estimate
Total Cost and Benefit:

The project’s total cost is estimated at $4,844 which does not include the design and engineering costs. The estimated benefit of these improvements is $117,444 based on the Highway Safety Benefit-Cost Analysis Model (Version 2.0). The resulting Benefit-Cost ratio is

24.25. The HSIP Cycle 11 program has a required minimum B/C ratio (BCR) of 3.5 for a BCR Application. With a B/C ratio of 24.25, the proposed intersection improvement project is eligible for HSIP funding and is considered a competitive HSIP project.

Itemized Benefits
Safety $116,811
Travel Time $566
Vehicle Operating Cost $56
Emissions $11
Total Benefits $117,444
Summary of Total Cost & Benefit
Present Value Costs ($ Dollars) $4,844
Present Value Benefits ($ Dollars) $117,444
Net Present Value ($ Dollars) $112,600
Benefit / Cost Ratio 24.25
1 Install "Cross Traffic Does Not Stop" [W4-4P] Sign EA 1 $ 575.00 $ 575.00 90% 2 Repaint Intersection Traffic Striping LF 901 3.50 $ $ 3,153.50 3 Repaint Pavement Word Marking LF 22 14.00 $ $ 308.00 90% $ 4,036.50
100% 14.2% 7.6% 78.1%
* Non-signalized Countermeasure Identification of Local Roadway Safety Manual (Version 1.6, April 2022) 20%
Total Construction Cost: $ 4,036.50
Contingencies percentage of the aforementioned Total Construction Cost: $ 807.30 Total Construction Cost (Including Contingencies): $ 4,843.80 HSIP Funding Eligibility

LRSM CM
No. (NS06)* OS**
Total
Weighted Average (%)
Total LRSM CM
No. (NS07)*
**OS: Other Safety-Related Improvements
No. Item Description Unit Quantity Unit Cost
FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 116

9.2.5 Local Intersection 5: Moonridge Rd & Brownie Ln
Figure 40: Local Intersection 5 Crash Diagram- 2 Collisions (January 1, 2017 - December 31, 2021)
Source: University of California, Berkeley Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS) *Collision Locations are approximate due to the size and overlapping of collisions Mapping Summary:

Fatal Crash 0
Injury Crash 1
PDO Crash 1
Total 2
FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 117
FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 118

9.2.5.1 Local Intersection 5 Cost Estimate and Cost/Benefit Analysis Construction Cost Estimate:

The following table represents the preliminary line-item cost for the proposed countermeasures.

Line-item costs are derived from the Caltrans contract cost database for District 8 as of October 17, 2022.

Table 54: Local Intersection 5 Cost Estimate
Total Cost and Benefit:

The project’s total cost is estimated at $10,175 which does not include the design and engineering costs. The estimated benefit of these improvements is $117,444 based on the Highway Safety Benefit-Cost Analysis Model (Version 2.0). The resulting Benefit-Cost ratio is

11.54. The HSIP Cycle 11 program has a required minimum B/C ratio (BCR) of 3.5 for a BCR Application. With a B/C ratio of 11.54, the proposed intersection improvement project is eligible for HSIP funding and is considered a competitive HSIP project.

Itemized Benefits
Safety $116,811
Travel Time $566
Vehicle Operating Cost $56
Emissions $11
Total Benefits $117,444
Summary of Total Cost & Benefit
Present Value Costs ($ Dollars) $10,175
Present Value Benefits ($ Dollars) $117,444
Net Present Value ($ Dollars) $107,269
Benefit / Cost Ratio 11.54
1 Install "Cross Traffic Does Not Stop" [W4-4P] Sign EA 2 $ 575.00 $ 1,150.00 90% 3 Repaint Pavement Word Marking SQFT 66 14.00 $ $ 924.00 90% 4 Install/Repaint Intersection Traffic Striping LF 1642 3.50 $ $ 5,747.00 5 Install Pavement Word Marking SQFT 22 14.00 $ $ 308.00 90% 6 Install Type I Pavement Arrow Marking SQFT 25 14.00 $ $ 350.00 90% $ 8,479.00
100% 18.7% 13.6% 67.8%
* Non-signalized Countermeasure Identification of Local Roadway Safety Manual (Version 1.6, April 2022) 20%
Total Construction Cost: $ 8,479.00
Contingencies percentage of the aforementioned Total Construction Cost: $ 1,695.80 Total Construction Cost (Including Contingencies): $ 10,174.80

LRSM CM
No. (NS07)*

9.2.6 Local Intersection 6: Village Dr & Pine Knot Ave
Figure 41: Local Intersection 6 Crash Diagram- 2 Collisions (January 1, 2017 - December 31, 2021)
Source: University of California, Berkeley Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS) *Collision Locations are approximate due to the size and overlapping of collisions Pine Knot Ave Village Dr
Mapping Summary:

Fatal Crash 0
Injury Crash 1
PDO Crash 1
Total 2
FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 120
FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 121

9.2.6.1 Local Intersection 6 Cost Estimate and Cost/Benefit Analysis Construction Cost Estimate:

The following table represents the preliminary line-item cost for the proposed countermeasures.

Line-item costs are derived from the Caltrans contract cost database for District 8 as of October 17, 2022.

Table 55: Local Intersection 6 Cost Estimate
Total Cost and Benefit:

The project’s total cost is estimated at $1,705 which does not include the design and engineering costs. The estimated benefit of these improvements is $102,462 based on the Highway Safety Benefit-Cost Analysis Model (Version 2.0). The resulting Benefit-Cost ratio is

60.09. The HSIP Cycle 11 program has a required minimum B/C ratio (BCR) of 3.5 for a BCR Application. With a B/C ratio of 60.09, the proposed intersection improvement project is eligible for HSIP funding and is considered a competitive HSIP project.

Itemized Benefits
Safety $101,910
Travel Time $494
Vehicle Operating Cost $49
Emissions $10
Total Benefits $102,462
Summary of Total Cost & Benefit
Present Value Costs ($ Dollars) $1,705
Present Value Benefits ($ Dollars) $102,462
Net Present Value ($ Dollars) $100,757
Benefit / Cost Ratio 60.09
1 Repaint Pavement Word Marking SQFT 88 14.00 $ $ 1,232.00 2 Install/Repaint Intersection Traffic Striping LF 54 3.50 $ $ 189.00 $ 1,421.00
100%
* Non-signalized Countermeasure Identification of Local Roadway Safety Manual (Version 1.6, April 2022) 20%

13.3%
HSIP Funding Eligibility
$ 1,421.00

LRSM CM
No. (NS07)*
90%
No. Item Description Unit Quantity Unit Cost Total
OS**
Total Construction Cost (Including Contingencies):

Total
Weighted Average (%)
**OS: Other Safety-Related Improvements

86.7%
Total Construction Cost:

Contingencies percentage of the aforementioned Total Construction Cost: $ 284.20 $ 1,705.20
FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 122

9.2.7 Local Intersection 7: Pedder Rd & Pine Knot Ave
Figure 42: Local Intersection 7 Crash Diagram- 2 Collisions (January 1, 2017 - December 31, 2021)
Source: University of California, Berkeley Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS) *Collision Locations are approximate due to the size and overlapping of collisions Pine Knot Ave Pedder Rd
Mapping Summary:

Fatal Crash 0
Injury Crash 0
PDO Crash 2
Total 2
FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 123
FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 124

9.2.7.1 Local Intersection 7 Cost Estimate and Cost/Benefit Analysis Construction Cost Estimate:

The following table represents the preliminary line-item cost for the proposed countermeasures.

Line-item costs are derived from the Caltrans contract cost database for District 8 as of October 17, 2022.

Table 56: Local Intersection 7 Cost Estimate
Total Cost and Benefit:

The project’s total cost is estimated at $1,110 which does not include the design and engineering costs. The estimated benefit of these improvements is $20,542 based on the Highway Safety Benefit-Cost Analysis Model (Version 2.0). The resulting Benefit-Cost ratio is

18.51. The HSIP Cycle 11 program has a required minimum B/C ratio (BCR) of 3.5 for a BCR Application. With a B/C ratio of 18.51 the proposed intersection improvement project is eligible for HSIP funding and is considered a competitive HSIP project.

Itemized Benefits
Safety $20,046
Travel Time $454
Vehicle Operating Cost $41
Emissions $0
Total Benefits $20,542
Summary of Total Cost & Benefit
Present Value Costs ($ Dollars) $1,110
Present Value Benefits ($ Dollars) $20,542
Net Present Value ($ Dollars) $19,432
Benefit / Cost Ratio 18.51
1 Install "Cross Traffic Does Not Stop" [W4-4P] Sign EA 1 $ 575.00 $ 575.00 90% 2 Repaint Pavement Word Marking SQFT 22 14.00 $ $ 308.00 90% 3 Repaint Intersection Traffic Striping LF 12 3.50 $ $ 42.00 $ 925.00
100% 33.3% 62.2% 4.5%
* Non-signalized Countermeasure Identification of Local Roadway Safety Manual (Version 1.6, April 2022) 20%
No. Item Description Unit Quantity Unit Cost
Total Construction Cost (Including Contingencies): $ 1,110.00

LRSM CM
No. (NS07)*

LRSM CM
No. (NS06)*
**OS: Other Safety-Related Improvements
Total Construction Cost: $ 925.00
Contingencies percentage of the aforementioned Total Construction Cost: $ 185.00 Total
Weighted Average (%)
Total
HSIP Funding Eligibility
OS**
FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 125

9.2.8 Local Intersection 8: Brownie Ln & Thrush Dr
Figure 43: Local Intersection 8 Crash Diagram- 2 Collisions (January 1, 2017 - December 31, 2021)
Source: University of California, Berkeley Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS) *Collision Locations are approximate due to the size and overlapping of collisions Thrush Dr Brownie Ln
Mapping Summary:

Fatal Crash 0
Injury Crash 0
PDO Crash 2
Total 2
FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 126
FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 127

9.2.8.1 Local Intersection 8 Cost Estimate and Cost/Benefit Analysis Construction Cost Estimate:

The following table represents the preliminary line-item cost for the proposed countermeasures.

Line-item costs are derived from the Caltrans contract cost database for District 8 as of October 17, 2022.

Table 57: Local Intersection 8 Cost Estimate
Total Cost and Benefit:

The project’s total cost is estimated at $4,022 which does not include the design and engineering costs. The estimated benefit of these improvements is $117,444 based on the Highway Safety Benefit-Cost Analysis Model (Version 2.0). The resulting Benefit-Cost ratio is

5.11. The HSIP Cycle 11 program has a required minimum B/C ratio (BCR) of 3.5 for a BCR Application. With a B/C ratio of 5.11 the proposed intersection improvement project is eligible for HSIP funding and is considered a competitive HSIP project.

Itemized Benefits
Safety $20,046
Travel Time $454
Vehicle Operating Cost $41
Emissions $0
Total Benefits $117,444
Summary of Total Cost & Benefit
Present Value Costs ($ Dollars) $4,022
Present Value Benefits ($ Dollars) $20,542
Net Present Value ($ Dollars) $16,520
Benefit / Cost Ratio 5.11
1 Install "Cross Traffic Does Not Stop" [W4-4P] Sign EA 2 $ 575.00 $ 1,150.00 90% 2 Repaint Pavement Word Marking SQFT 44 14.00 $ $ 616.00 90% 3 Repaint Intersection Traffic Striping LF 85 3.50 $ $ 297.50 4 Repaint Pavement Symbol Marking SQFT 92 14.00 $ $ 1,288.00 90% $ 3,351.50
100% 56.8% 34.3% 8.9%
* Non-signalized Countermeasure Identification of Local Roadway Safety Manual (Version 1.6, April 2022) 20%
Total Construction Cost:

Contingencies percentage of the aforementioned Total Construction Cost:

Total Construction Cost (Including Contingencies):
$ 3,351.50
$ 670.30
$ 4,021.80

LRSM CM
No. (NS07)*

9.2.9 Local Intersection 9: Crestwood Dr & Evergreen Dr Figure 44: Local Intersection 9 Crash Diagram- 2 Collisions (January 1, 2017 - December 31, 2021)
Source: University of California, Berkeley Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS) *Collision Locations are approximate due to the size and overlapping of collisions Crestwood Dr Evergreen Dr
Mapping Summary:

Fatal Crash 0
Injury Crash 0
PDO Crash 2
Total 2
FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 129
FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 130

9.2.9.1 Local Intersection 9 Cost Estimate and Cost/Benefit Analysis Construction Cost Estimate:

The following table represents the preliminary line-item cost for the proposed countermeasures.

Line-item costs are derived from the Caltrans contract cost database for District 8 as of October 17, 2022.

Table 58: Local Intersection 9 Cost Estimate
Total Cost and Benefit:

The project’s total cost is estimated at $1,680 which does not include the design and engineering costs. The estimated benefit of these improvements is $17,921 based on the Highway Safety Benefit-Cost Analysis Model (Version 2.0). The resulting Benefit-Cost ratio is

10.61. The HSIP Cycle 11 program has a required minimum B/C ratio (BCR) of 3.5 for a BCR Application. With a B/C ratio of 10.61 the proposed intersection improvement project is eligible for HSIP funding and is considered a competitive HSIP project.

Itemized Benefits
Safety $17,489
Travel Time $396
Vehicle Operating Cost $36
Emissions $0
Total Benefits $17,921
Summary of Total Cost & Benefit
Present Value Costs ($ Dollars) $1,680
Present Value Benefits ($ Dollars) $17,921
Net Present Value ($ Dollars) $16,241
Benefit / Cost Ratio 10.61
1 Repaint Pavement Word Marking SQFT 88 14.00 $ $ 1,232.00 90% 2 Repaint Intersection Traffic Striping LF 48 3.50 $ $ 168.00 $ 1,400.00
100% 88.0% 12.0%
* Non-signalized Countermeasure Identification of Local Roadway Safety Manual (Version 1.6, April 2022) 20%
Total Construction Cost: $ 1,400.00
gencies percentage of the aforementioned Total Construction Cost: $ 280.00 Total Construction Cost (Including Contingencies): $ 1,680.00

LRSM CM
No. (NS07)*
Total
Weighted Average (%)
**OS: Other Safety-Related Improvements
No. Item Description Unit Quantity Unit Cost Total
HSIP Funding Eligibility
OS**
FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 131

9.2.10 Local Intersection 10: Menlo Dr & Butte Ave
Figure 45: Local Intersection 10 Crash Diagram- 1 Collision (January 1, 2017 - December 31, 2021)
Source: University of California, Berkeley Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS) *Collision Locations are approximate due to the size and overlapping of collisions Butte Ave
Mapping Summary:

Fatal Crash 1
Injury Crash 0
PDO Crash 0
Total 1
FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 132
FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 133

9.2.10.1 Local Intersection 10 Cost Estimate and Cost/Benefit Analysis Construction Cost Estimate:

The following table represents the preliminary line-item cost for the proposed countermeasures.

Line-item costs are derived from the Caltrans contract cost database for District 8 as of October 17, 2022.

Table 59: Local Intersection 10 Cost Estimate
Total Cost and Benefit:

The project’s total cost is estimated at $1,127 which does not include the design and engineering costs. The estimated benefit of these improvements is $9,638,668 based on the Highway Safety Benefit-Cost Analysis Model (Version 2.0). The resulting Benefit-Cost ratio is 8,554.02.

The HSIP Cycle 11 program has a required minimum B/C ratio (BCR) of 3.5 for a BCR Application. With a B/C ratio of 8,554.02, the proposed intersection improvement project is eligible for HSIP funding and is considered a competitive HSIP project.

Itemized Benefits
Safety $9,634,013
Travel Time $4,574
Vehicle Operating Cost $81
Emissions $0
Total Benefits $9,638,668
Summary of Total Cost & Benefit
Present Value Costs ($ Dollars) $1,127
Present Value Benefits ($ Dollars) $9,638,668
Net Present Value ($ Dollars) $9,637,542
Benefit / Cost Ratio 8,554.02
1 Install "Cross Traffic Does Not Stop" [W4-4P] Sign EA 1 $ 575.00 $ 575.00 90% 2 Repaint Pavement Word Marking SQFT 22 14.00 $ $ 308.00 90% 3 Repaint Intersection Traffic Striping LF 16 3.50 $ $ 56.00 $ 939.00
100% 32.8% 61.2% 6.0%
* Non-signalized Countermeasure Identification of Local Roadway Safety Manual (Version 1.6, April 2022) 20%
**OS: Other Safety-Related Improvements
No. Item Description Unit Quantity Unit Cost LRSM CM
No. (NS07)*

LRSM CM
No. (NS06)*
Total
Weighted Average (%)
Total
HSIP Funding Eligibility
OS**
Total Construction Cost:

Contingencies percentage of the aforementioned Total Construction Cost:

Total Construction Cost (Including Contingencies):
$ 939.00
$ 187.80
$ 1,126.80
FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 134

9.3 High Collision State & Local Roadway Segments

9.3.1 Roadway Segment 1: Big Bear Blvd [SR-18] (from Stanfield Cutoff to Division Dr)

Figure 46: Roadway Segment 1 Crash Diagram- 17 Collisions (January 1, 2017 - December 31, 2021)
Source: University of California, Berkeley Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS) *Collision Locations are approximate due to the size and overlapping of collisions T St
Mapping Summary:

Fatal Crash 0
Injury Crash 12
PDO Crash 5
Total 17
Stanfield Cutoff
Division Dr
Big Bear Blvd
FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 135
FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 136
FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 137
FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 138

9.3.1.1 Roadway Segment 1 Cost Estimate and Cost/Benefit Analysis Construction Cost Estimate:

The following table represents the preliminary line-item cost for the proposed countermeasures.

Line-item costs are derived from the Caltrans contract cost database for District 8 as of October 17, 2022.

Table 60: Roadway Segment 1 Cost Estimate
Total Cost and Benefit:

The project’s total cost is estimated at $54,978 which does not include the design and engineering costs. The estimated benefit of these improvements is $2,263,145 based on the Highway Safety Benefit-Cost Analysis Model (Version 2.0). The resulting Benefit-Cost ratio is

41.16. The HSIP Cycle 11 program has a required minimum B/C ratio (BCR) of 3.5 for a BCR Application. With a B/C ratio of 41.16, the proposed intersection improvement project is eligible for HSIP funding and is considered a competitive HSIP project.

Itemized Benefits
Safety $2,256,699
Travel Time $5,777
Vehicle Operating Cost $584
Emissions $86
Total Benefits $2,263,145
Summary of Total Cost & Benefit
Present Value Costs ($ Dollars) $54,978
Present Value Benefits ($ Dollars) $2,263,145
Net Present Value ($ Dollars) $2,208,167
Benefit / Cost Ratio 41.16
1 Install Centerline Rumble Strips LF 3700 1.20 $ $ 4,440.00 90% 2 Repaint Edge-line Striping LF 11000 3.50 $ $ 38,500.00 90% 3 Install Curve Advance Warning [W1-2L] Sign EA 2 $ 575.00 $ 1,150.00 90% 4 Install Curve Advance Warning [W1-2R] Sign EA 3 $ 575.00 $ 1,725.00 90% $ 45,815.00
100% 9.7% 84.0% 6.3%
* Roadway Countermeasure Identification of Local Roadway Safety Manual (Version 1.6, April 2022) 20%
No. Item Description Unit Quantity Unit Cost
Total Construction Cost (Including Contingencies): $ 54,978.00

LRSM CM
No. (R30)*

LRSM CM
No. (R28)*
Total
Weighted Average (%)
**OS: Other Safety-Related Improvements
Total LRSM CM
No. (R24)*
HSIP Funding Eligibility
Total Construction Cost: $ 45,815.00
Contingencies percentage of the aforementioned Total Construction Cost: $ 9,163.00 FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 139

9.3.2 Roadway Segment 2: Big Bear Blvd [SR-18] (from Sandalwood Dr to Starvation Flats Rd)
Figure 47: Roadway Segment 2 Crash Diagram- 9 Collisions (January 1, 2017 – December 31, 2021)
Source: University of California, Berkeley Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS) *Collision Locations are approximate due to the size and overlapping of collisions Mapping Summary:

Fatal Crash 0
Injury Crash 6
PDO Crash 3
Total 9
FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 140
FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 141

9.3.2.1 Roadway Segment 2 Cost Estimate and Cost/Benefit Analysis Construction Cost Estimate:

The following table represents the preliminary line-item cost for the proposed countermeasures.

Line-item costs are derived from the Caltrans contract cost database for District 8 as of October 17, 2022.

Table 61: Roadway Segment 2 Cost Estimate
Total Cost and Benefit:

The project’s total cost is estimated at $2,760 which does not include the design and engineering costs. The estimated benefit of these improvements is $1,311,867 based on the Highway Safety Benefit-Cost Analysis Model (Version 2.0). The resulting Benefit-Cost ratio is 475.31.

The HSIP Cycle 11 program has a required minimum B/C ratio (BCR) of 3.5 for a BCR Application. With a B/C ratio of 475.31, the proposed intersection improvement project is eligible for HSIP funding and is considered a competitive HSIP project.

Itemized Benefits
Safety $1,308,858
Travel Time $2,714
Vehicle Operating Cost $273
Emissions $22
Total Benefits $1,311,867
Summary of Total Cost & Benefit
Present Value Costs ($ Dollars) $2,760
Present Value Benefits ($ Dollars) $1,311,867
Net Present Value ($ Dollars) $1,309,107
Benefit / Cost Ratio 475.31
1 Install Curve Advance Warning [W1-2R] Sign EA 1 $ 575.00 $ 575.00 90% 2 Install Curve Advance Warning [W1-2L] Sign EA 1 $ 575.00 $ 575.00 90% 3 Install [W11-1] & [W16-1P] Sign EA 1 1,150.00$ $ 1,150.00 90% $ 2,300.00
100% 50.0% 50.0%
* Roadway Countermeasure Identification of Local Roadway Safety Manual (Version 1.6, April 2022) 20%

LRSM CM
No. (R22)*
HSIP Funding Eligibility
No. Item Description Unit Quantity Unit Cost
Total Construction Cost (Including Contingencies): $ 2,760.00

LRSM CM
No. (R24)*
Total
Weighted Average (%)
Total
**OS: Other Safety-Related Improvements
Total Construction Cost: $ 2,300.00
Contingencies percentage of the aforementioned Total Construction Cost: $ 460.00 FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 142

9.3.3 Roadway Segment 3: Big Bear Blvd [SR-18] (from Fox Farm Rd to Lakeview Ctr)

Figure 48: Roadway Segment 3 Crash Diagram- 5 Collisions (January 1, 2017 - December 31, 2021)
Source: University of California, Berkeley Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS) *Collision Locations are approximate due to the size and overlapping of collisions Mapping Summary:

Fatal Crash 1
Injury Crash 4
PDO Crash 0
Total 5
FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 143
FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 144

9.3.3.1 Roadway Segment 3 Cost Estimate and Cost/Benefit Analysis Construction Cost Estimate:

The following table represents the preliminary line-item cost for the proposed countermeasures.

Line-item costs are derived from the Caltrans contract cost database for District 8 as of October 17, 2022.

Table 62: Roadway Segment 3 Cost Estimate
Total Cost and Benefit:

The project’s total cost is estimated at $2,760 which does not include the design and engineering costs. The estimated benefit of these improvements is $5,269,848 based on the Highway Safety Benefit-Cost Analysis Model (Version 2.0). The resulting Benefit-Cost ratio is 1909.37.

The HSIP Cycle 11 program has a required minimum B/C ratio (BCR) of 3.5 for a BCR Application. With a B/C ratio of 1909.37, the proposed intersection improvement project is eligible for HSIP funding and is considered a competitive HSIP project.

Itemized Benefits
Safety $5,266,605
Travel Time $3,104
Vehicle Operating Cost $116
Emissions $23
Total Benefits $5,269,848
Summary of Total Cost & Benefit
Present Value Costs ($ Dollars) $2,760
Present Value Benefits ($ Dollars) $5,269,848
Net Present Value ($ Dollars) $5,267,088
Benefit / Cost Ratio 1909.37
HSIP Funding
Eligibility
1 Install "Cross Traffic Does Not Stop" [W4-4P] Sign EA 1 $ 575.00 $ 575.00 90% 2 Install Speed Limit [R2-1] (40) Sign EA 3 $ 575.00 $ 1,725.00 90% $ 2,300.00
100% 100%
* Roadway Countermeasure Identification of Local Roadway Safety Manual (Version 1.6, April 2022) 20% $ 460.00
No. Item Description Unit Quantity Unit Cost
Contingencies percentage of the aforementioned Total Construction Cost:

Total Construction Cost (Including Contingencies): $ 2,760.00

LRSM CM
No. (R22)*
Total
Weighted Average (%)
**OS: Other Safety-Related Improvements
Total Construction Cost: $ 2,300.00
Total
FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 145

9.3.4 Roadway Segment 4: Big Bear Blvd [SR-18] (from Moonridge Wy to Catalina Rd)
Figure 49: Roadway Segment 4 Crash Diagram- 5 Collisions (January 1, 2017 - December 31, 2021)
Source: University of California, Berkeley Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS) *Collision Locations are approximate due to the size and overlapping of collisions Mapping Summary:

Fatal Crash 0
Injury Crash 2
PDO Crash 3
Total 5
FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 146
FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 147

9.3.4.1 Roadway Segment 4 Cost Estimate and Cost/Benefit Analysis Construction Cost Estimate:

The following table represents the preliminary line-item cost for the proposed countermeasures.

Line-item costs are derived from the Caltrans contract cost database for District 8 as of October 17, 2022.

Table 63: Roadway Segment 4 Cost Estimate
Total Cost and Benefit:

The project’s total cost is estimated at $3,450 which does not include the design and engineering costs. The estimated benefit of these improvements is $128,331 based on the Highway Safety Benefit-Cost Analysis Model (Version 2.0). The resulting Benefit-Cost ratio is

37.2. The HSIP Cycle 11 program has a required minimum B/C ratio (BCR) of 3.5 for a BCR Application. With a B/C ratio of 37.2, the proposed intersection improvement project is eligible for HSIP funding and is considered a competitive HSIP project.

Itemized Benefits
Safety $127,539
Travel Time $711
Vehicle Operating Cost $69
Emissions $12
Total Benefits $128,331
Summary of Total Cost & Benefit
Present Value Costs ($ Dollars) $3,450
Present Value Benefits ($ Dollars) $128,331
Net Present Value ($ Dollars) $124,881
Benefit / Cost Ratio 37.2
HSIP Funding
Eligibility
1 Install "Cross Traffic Does Not Stop" [W4-4P] Sign EA 3 $ 575.00 $ 1,725.00 90% 2 Install Speed Limit [R2-1] (40) Sign EA 2 $ 575.00 $ 1,150.00 90% $ 2,875.00
100% 100%
* Roadway Countermeasure Identification of Local Roadway Safety Manual (Version 1.6, April 2022) 20% $ 575.00
**OS: Other Safety-Related Improvements
No. Item Description Unit Quantity Unit Cost

LRSM CM
No. (R22)*
Total
Weighted Average (%)
Total
Total Construction Cost: $ 2,875.00
Contingencies percentage of the aforementioned Total Construction Cost:

Total Construction Cost (Including Contingencies): $ 3,450.00 FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 148

9.3.5 Roadway Segment 5: Big Bear Blvd [SR-18] (from Spruce Rd to Spruce Spur)
Figure 50: Roadway Segment 5 Crash Diagram- 3 Collisions (January 1, 2017 - December 31, 2021)
Source: University of California, Berkeley Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS) *Collision Locations are approximate due to the size and overlapping of collisions Mapping Summary:

Fatal Crash 0
Injury Crash 3
PDO Crash 0
Total 3
FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 149
FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 150

9.3.5.1 Roadway Segment 5 Cost Estimate and Cost/Benefit Analysis Construction Cost Estimate:

The following table represents the preliminary line-item cost for the proposed countermeasures.

Line-item costs are derived from the Caltrans contract cost database for District 8 as of October 17, 2022.

Table 64: Roadway Segment 5 Cost Estimate
Total Cost and Benefit:

The project’s total cost is estimated at $2,238 which does not include the design and engineering costs. The estimated benefit of these improvements is $728,610 based on the Highway Safety Benefit-Cost Analysis Model (Version 2.0). The resulting Benefit-Cost ratio is 325.56.

The HSIP Cycle 11 program has a required minimum B/C ratio (BCR) of 3.5 for a BCR Application. With a B/C ratio of 325.56, the proposed intersection improvement project is eligible for HSIP funding and is considered a competitive HSIP project.

Itemized Benefits
Safety $727,622
Travel Time $887
Vehicle Operating Cost $92
Emissions $10
Total Benefits $728,610
Summary of Total Cost & Benefit
Present Value Costs ($ Dollars) $2,238
Present Value Benefits ($ Dollars) $728,610
Net Present Value ($ Dollars) $726,372
Benefit / Cost Ratio 325.56
1 Install "Cross Traffic Does Not Stop" [W4-4P] Sign EA 2 $ 575.00 1,150.00$ 90% 2 Install Curve Advance Warning [W1-2R] Sign EA 1 $ 575.00 $ 575.00 90% 3 Repaint Traffic Striping LF 40 3.50 $ $ 140.00
1,865.00$
100% 8% 31% 62%
* Roadway Countermeasure Identification of Local Roadway Safety Manual (Version 1.6, April 2022) 20%

LRSM CM
No. (R22)*
HSIP Funding Eligibility
Total Construction Cost: $ 1,865.00
Contingencies percentage of the aforementioned Total Construction Cost: $ 373.00 Total Construction Cost (Including Contingencies): $ 2,238.00 OS** LRSM CM
No. (R24)*
Total
Weighted Average (%)
**OS: Other Safety-Related Improvements
No. Item Description Unit Quantity Unit Cost Total
FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 151

9.3.6 Roadway Segment 6: Moonridge Rd (from Brownie Ln to Evergreen Dr) Figure 51: Roadway Segment 6 Crash Diagram- 3 Collisions (January 1, 2017 - December 31, 2021)
Source: University of California, Berkeley Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS) *Collision Locations are approximate due to the size and overlapping of collisions Mapping Summary:

Fatal Crash 0
Injury Crash 2
PDO Crash 1
Total 3
FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 152
FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 153

9.3.6.1 Roadway Segment 6 Cost Estimate and Cost/Benefit Analysis Construction Cost Estimate:

The following table represents the preliminary line-item cost for the proposed countermeasures.

Line-item costs are derived from the Caltrans contract cost database for District 8 as of October 17, 2022.

Table 65: Roadway Segment 6 Cost Estimate
Total Cost and Benefit:

The project’s total cost is estimated at $23,177 which does not include the design and engineering costs. The estimated benefit of these improvements is $676,055 based on the Highway Safety Benefit-Cost Analysis Model (Version 2.0). The resulting Benefit-Cost ratio is

29.17. The HSIP Cycle 11 program has a required minimum B/C ratio (BCR) of 3.5 for a BCR Application. With a B/C ratio of 29.17, the proposed intersection improvement project is eligible for HSIP funding and is considered a competitive HSIP project.

Itemized Benefits
Safety $675,048
Travel Time $906
Vehicle Operating Cost $91
Emissions $11
Total Benefits $676,055
Summary of Total Cost & Benefit
Present Value Costs ($ Dollars) $23,177
Present Value Benefits ($ Dollars) $676,055
Net Present Value ($ Dollars) $652,878
Benefit / Cost Ratio 29.17
1 Install "Cross Traffic Does Not Stop" [W4-4P] Sign EA 1 $ 575.00 $ 575.00 90% 2 Repaint Centerline Striping LF 4184 3.50 $ $ 14,644.00 90% 3 Repaint Laneline Striping LF 1170 3.50 $ $ 4,095.00 90% $ 19,314.00
100% 76% 3% 21%
* Roadway Countermeasure Identification of Local Roadway Safety Manual (Version 1.6, April 2022) 20%
HSIP Funding Eligibility
No. Item Description Unit Quantity Unit Cost Total LRSM CM No. (R22)*
Total Construction Cost (Including Contingencies): $ 23,176.80

LRSM CM
No. (R28)* OS **
Total
Weighted Average (%)
**OS: Other Safety-Related Improvements
Total Construction Cost: $ 19,314.00
Contingencies percentage of the aforementioned Total Construction Cost: $ 3,862.80 FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 154

9.3.7 Roadway Segment 7: Big Bear Blvd [SR-18] (from Knickerbocker Rd to Alden Rd)
Figure 52: Roadway Segment 7 Crash Diagram- 3 Collisions (January 1, 2017 - December 31, 2021)
Source: University of California, Berkeley Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS) *Collision Locations are approximate due to the size and overlapping of collisions Mapping Summary:

Fatal Crash 0
Injury Crash 3
PDO Crash 0
Total 3
Big Bear Blvd
Alden Rd
FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 155
FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 156

9.3.7.1 Roadway Segment 7 Cost Estimate and Cost/Benefit Analysis Construction Cost Estimate:

The following table represents the preliminary line-item cost for the proposed countermeasures.

Line-item costs are derived from the Caltrans contract cost database for District 8 as of October 17, 2022.

Table 66: Roadway Segment 7 Cost Estimate
Total Cost and Benefit:

The project’s total cost is estimated at $2,760 which does not include the design and engineering costs. The estimated benefit of these improvements is $200,858 based on the Highway Safety Benefit-Cost Analysis Model (Version 2.0). The resulting Benefit-Cost ratio is

72.77. The HSIP Cycle 11 program has a required minimum B/C ratio (BCR) of 3.5 for a BCR Application. With a B/C ratio of 72.77, the proposed intersection improvement project is eligible for HSIP funding and is considered a competitive HSIP project.

Itemized Benefits
Safety $200,259
Travel Time $532
Vehicle Operating Cost $55
Emissions $12
Total Benefits $200,858
Summary of Total Cost & Benefit
Present Value Costs ($ Dollars) $2,760
Present Value Benefits ($ Dollars) $200,858
Net Present Value ($ Dollars) $198,098
Benefit / Cost Ratio 72.77
HSIP Funding
Eligibility
1 Install "Cross Traffic Does Not Stop" [W4-4P] Sign EA 2 $ 575.00 $ 1,150.00 90% 2 Install Speed Limit [R2-1] (35) Sign EA 2 $ 575.00 $ 1,150.00 90% $ 2,300.00
100% 100%
* Roadway Countermeasure Identification of Local Roadway Safety Manual (Version 1.6, April 2022) 20% $ 460.00
**OS: Other Safety-Related Improvements
No. Item Description Unit Quantity Unit Cost

LRSM CM
No. (R22)*
Total
Weighted Average (%)
Total
Total Construction Cost: $ 2,300.00
Contingencies percentage of the aforementioned Total Construction Cost:

Total Construction Cost (Including Contingencies): $ 2,760.00 FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 157

9.3.8 Roadway Segment 8: Big Bear Blvd [SR-18] (from Wren Dr to Crane Dr) Figure 53: Roadway Segment 8 Crash Diagram- 3 Collisions (January 1, 2017 - December 31, 2021)
Source: University of California, Berkeley Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS) *Collision Locations are approximate due to the size and overlapping of collisions Mapping Summary:

Fatal Crash 0
Injury Crash 2
PDO Crash 1
Total 3
Big Bear Blvd
Crane Dr
FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 158
FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 159

9.3.8.1 Roadway Segment 8 Cost Estimate and Cost/Benefit Analysis Construction Cost Estimate:

The following table represents the preliminary line-item cost for the proposed countermeasures.

Line-item costs are derived from the Caltrans contract cost database for District 8 as of October 17, 2022.

Table 67: Roadway Segment 8 Cost Estimate
Total Cost and Benefit:

The project’s total cost is estimated at $3,450 which does not include the design and engineering costs. The estimated benefit of these improvements is $150,133 based on the Highway Safety Benefit-Cost Analysis Model (Version 2.0). The resulting Benefit-Cost ratio is

43.52. The HSIP Cycle 11 program has a required minimum B/C ratio (BCR) of 3.5 for a BCR Application. With a B/C ratio of 43.52, the proposed intersection improvement project is eligible for HSIP funding and is considered a competitive HSIP project.

Itemized Benefits
Safety $149,606
Travel Time $474
Vehicle Operating Cost $48
Emissions $6
Total Benefits $150,133
Summary of Total Cost & Benefit
Present Value Costs ($ Dollars) $3,450
Present Value Benefits ($ Dollars) $150,133
Net Present Value ($ Dollars) $146,683
Benefit / Cost Ratio 43.52
HSIP Funding
Eligibility
1 Install "Cross Traffic Does Not Stop" [W4-4P] Sign EA 3 $ 575.00 $ 1,725.00 90% 2 Install Speed Limit [R2-1] (40) Sign EA 2 $ 575.00 $ 1,150.00 90% $ 2,875.00
100% 100%
* Roadway Countermeasure Identification of Local Roadway Safety Manual (Version 1.6, April 2022) 20% $ 575.00
**OS: Other Safety-Related Improvements
No. Item Description Unit Quantity Unit Cost LRSM CM
No. (R22)*
Total
Weighted Average (%)
Total
Total Construction Cost: $ 2,875.00
Contingencies percentage of the aforementioned Total Construction Cost:

9.3.9 Roadway Segment 9: Village Dr (from Cottage Ln to Bartlett Rd) Figure 54: Roadway Segment 9 Crash Diagram- 2 Collisions (January 1, 2017 - December 31, 2021)
Source: University of California, Berkeley Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS) *Collision Locations are approximate due to the size and overlapping of collisions Mapping Summary:

Fatal Crash 0
Injury Crash 1
PDO Crash 1
Total 2
Village Dr
Cottage Ln
Bartlett Rd
FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 161
FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 162

9.3.9.1 Roadway Segment 9 Cost Estimate and Cost/Benefit Analysis Construction Cost Estimate:

The following table represents the preliminary line-item cost for the proposed countermeasures.

Line-item costs are derived from the Caltrans contract cost database for District 8 as of October 17, 2022.

Table 68: Roadway Segment 9 Cost Estimate
Total Cost and Benefit:

The project’s total cost is estimated at $8,280 which does not include the design and engineering costs. The estimated benefit of these improvements is $61,477 based on the Highway Safety Benefit-Cost Analysis Model (Version 2.0). The resulting Benefit-Cost ratio is

7.42. The HSIP Cycle 11 program has a required minimum B/C ratio (BCR) of 3.5 for a BCR Application. With a B/C ratio of 7.42, the proposed intersection improvement project is eligible for HSIP funding and is considered a competitive HSIP project.

Itemized Benefits
Safety $61,146
Travel Time $296
Vehicle Operating Cost $29
Emissions $6
Total Benefits $61,477
Summary of Total Cost & Benefit
Present Value Costs ($ Dollars) $8,280
Present Value Benefits ($ Dollars) $61,477
Net Present Value ($ Dollars) $53,197
Benefit / Cost Ratio 7.42
HSIP Funding
Eligibility
1 Install "Cross Traffic Does Not Stop" [W4-4P] Sign EA 2 $ 575.00 $ 1,150.00 90% 2 Install [W11-1] & [W16-7PL] Sign EA 5 $ 1,150.00 $ 5,750.00 90% $ 6,900.00
100% 100%
* Roadway Countermeasure Identification of Local Roadway Safety Manual (Version 1.6, April 2022) 20% $ 1,380.00
**OS: Other Safety-Related Improvements
No. Item Description Unit Quantity Unit Cost

LRSM CM
No. (R22)*
Total
Weighted Average (%)
Total
Total Construction Cost: $ 6,900.00
Contingencies percentage of the aforementioned Total Construction Cost:

Total Construction Cost (Including Contingencies): $ 8,280.00 FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 163

9.3.10 Roadway Segment 10: Colusa Dr (from Colusa Wy to Colusa Ln) Figure 55: Roadway Segment 10 Crash Diagram- 2 Collisions (January 1, 2017 - December 31, 2021)
Source: University of California, Berkeley Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS) *Collision Locations are approximate due to the size and overlapping of collisions Mapping Summary:

Fatal Crash 0
Injury Crash 1
PDO Crash 1
Total 2
FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 164
FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 165

9.3.10.1 Roadway Segment 10 Cost Estimate and Cost/Benefit Analysis Construction Cost Estimate:

The following table represents the preliminary line-item cost for the proposed countermeasures.

Line-item costs are derived from the Caltrans contract cost database for District 8 as of October 17, 2022.

Table 69: Roadway Segment 10 Cost Estimate
Total Cost and Benefit:

The project’s total cost is estimated at $3,816 which does not include the design and engineering costs. The estimated benefit of these improvements is $117,444 based on the Highway Safety Benefit-Cost Analysis Model (Version 2.0). The resulting Benefit-Cost ratio is

30.78. The HSIP Cycle 11 program has a required minimum B/C ratio (BCR) of 3.5 for a BCR Application. With a B/C ratio of 30.78, the proposed intersection improvement project is eligible for HSIP funding and is considered a competitive HSIP project.

Itemized Benefits
Safety $116,811
Travel Time $566
Vehicle Operating Cost $56
Emissions $11
Total Benefits $117,444
Summary of Total Cost & Benefit
Present Value Costs ($ Dollars) $3,816
Present Value Benefits ($ Dollars) $117,444
Net Present Value ($ Dollars) $113,628
Benefit / Cost Ratio 30.78
1 Install Curve Advance Warning (W1-2L) Sign EA 1 $ 575.00 $ 575.00 90% 2 Install "Watch Downhill Speed" [SW4-1] (CA) Sign EA 1 $ 575.00 $ 575.00 90% 3 Install Centerline Striping LF 580 3.50 $ $ 2,030.00 90% $ 3,180.00
100% 18.1% 18.1% 63.8%
* Roadway Countermeasure Identification of Local Roadway Safety Manual (Version 1.6, April 2022) 20% $ 636.00
**OS: Other Safety-Related Improvements
$ 3,180.00
Total Construction Cost (Including Contingencies): $ 3,816.00 Total Construction Cost:

Contingencies percentage of the afroementioned Total Construction Cost

LRSM CM
No. (R24)*

LRSM CM
No. (R22)*
Total
HSIP Funding Eligibility

LRSM CM
No. (R28)*
Weighted Average (%)
No. Item Description Unit Quantity Unit Cost Total
FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 166
Table 70: Total Construction Cost of Intersections and Roadway Segments As of 10/17/22
Intersection/Segment Street Total Construction Cost (Including Contingencies) State Intersection 1 Big Bear Blvd (SR-18) & Sandalwood Dr $ 2,760.00 State Intersection 2 Big Bear Blvd (SR-18) & Summit Blvd $ 3,905.40 State Intersection 3 Big Bear Blvd (SR-18) & Lakeview Dr $ 2,760.00 State Intersection 4 Big Bear Blvd (SR-18) & Thrush Dr $ 2,760.00 State Intersection 5 Big Bear Blvd (SR-18) & Stanfield Cutoff $ 18,316.80 State Intersection 6 Big Bear Blvd (SR-18) & Georgia St $ 27,847.20 State Intersection 7 Big Bear Blvd (SR-18) & Fox Farm Rd $ 3,379.20 State Intersection 8 Big Bear Blvd (SR-18) & Division Dr $ 4,046.16 State Intersection 9 Big Bear Blvd (SR-18) & Cienega Rd $ 2,847.06 State Intersection 10 Big Bear Blvd (SR-18) & Knight Ave $ 1,208.70 Local Intersection 1 Lahontan Dr & Mountainaire Ln $ 1,380.00 Local Intersection 2 Moonridge Rd & Elm St N/A
Local Intersection 3 Starvation Flats Rd & Fox Farm Rd $ 2,698.80 Local Intersection 4 Tehama Dr & Moonridge Rd $ 4,843.80 Local Intersection 5 Moonridge Rd & Brownie Ln $ 10,174.80 Local Intersection 6 Village Dr & Pine Knot Ave $ 1,705.20 Local Intersection 7 Pedder Rd & Pine Knot Ave $ 1,110.00 Local Intersection 8 Brownie Ln & Thrush Dr $ 4,021.80
Local Intersection 9 Crestwood Dr & Evergreen Dr $ 1,680.00 Local Intersection 10 Menlo Dr & Butte Ave $ 1,126.80
Roadway Segment 1 Big Bear Blvd [SR-18] (Stanfield Cutoff to Division Dr) $ 54,978.00 Roadway Segment 2 Big Bear Blvd [SR-18] (Sandalwood Dr to Starvation Flats Rd) $ 2,760.00 Roadway Segment 3 Big Bear Blvd [SR-18] (Fox Farm Rd to Lakeview Ctr) $ 2,760.00 Roadway Segment 4 Big Bear Blvd [SR-18] (Moonridge Wy to Catalina Rd) $ 3,450.00 Roadway Segment 5 Big Bear Blvd [SR-18] (Spruce Rd to Spruce Spur) $ 2,238.00 Roadway Segment 6 Moonridge Rd (Brownie Ln to Evergreen Dr) $ 23,176.80 Roadway Segment 7 Big Bear Blvd [SR-18] (Knickerbocker Rd to Alden Rd) $ 2,760.00 Roadway Segment 8 Big Bear Blvd [SR-18] (Wren Dr to Crane Dr) $ 3,450.00 Roadway Segment 9 Village Dr (Cottage Ln to Bartlett Rd) $ 8,280.00 Roadway Segment 10 Colusa Dr (Colusa Wy to Colusa Ln) $ 3,816.00 Total $ 206,240.52
FINAL Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
City of Big Bear Lake, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 167

APPENDIX A
Stakeholders Meeting of October 23, 2023
City of Big Bear Lake Local Road Safety Plan (LRSP) Stakeholder's Meeting- October 23rd at 2pm From: Katya Meyer <[email protected]>
Date: 10/05/2023 05:17PM
To: "Yahya, Haissam S@DOT" <[email protected]>, "Sutharsan, Thiyagarajah@DOT" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "Ellen Clarke ([email protected])" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, Mike Maltby <[email protected]> Cc: Fred Minagar <[email protected]>, Sean Sullivan <[email protected]>, Engineering <[email protected]>
Dear Stakeholder,
The City of Big Bear Lake has contracted with Minagar & Associates, Inc. for the preparation of a Local Road Safety Plan (LRSP). The purpose of the LRSP is to identify and analyze intersections, and local roadways to provide proposed countermeasures to improve roadway safety. You have been identified as a key partner for traffic safety in the City of Big Bear Lake. We would like to invite you to a stakeholder’s meeting for a review and discussion of the LRSP, which will be presented to the City Council at a later meeting. In the link below, you will find a copy of the LRSP for you to review prior to the stakeholder’s meeting.

The meeting will be held remotely via Zoom on October 23, 2023 at 2:00pm, at the link below.

We hope that you can join us for the meeting. If you are unable to attend, please send us your comments and/or questions to [email protected] by 10am on October 23, 2023.

Link to City of Big Bear Lake Local Road Safety Plan (LRSP):
https://cityofbigbearlake.sharefile.com/d-s0d27c116b3eb491e926896143a0f8f0b October 23, 2023, 2:00pm Zoom Meeting Link/ID:
https://us06web.zoom.us/j/81098973222?pwd=7FeUzPhHibLINxkSvwa76ewhxabeZG.1 Meeting ID: 810 9897 3222
Passcode: 524703
Please contact me with any questions. Thank you for your continued support and partnership.

Sincerely,
Katya Meyer
Project Manager
39707 Big Bear Blvd., PO Box 10000 Big Bear Lake, CA 92315 909.866.5831 Ext. 149 | www.citybigbearlake.com
Big Bear Lake City Hall is open Monday - Friday, from 8:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m.

Please note that email correspondence with the City of Big Bear Lake, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.

Attachments ( 4 files, 25.2 KB)
- image904627.png (23.0 KB)
- image916121.png (682.0 B)
- image243112.png (670.0 B)
- image411285.png (838.0 B)
RE: City of Big Bear Lake Local Road Safety Plan (LRSP) Stakeholder's Meeting- October 23rd at 2pm
From: Katya Meyer <[email protected]>
Date: 10/17/2023 03:51PM
To: "Yahya, Haissam S@DOT" <[email protected]>, "Sutharsan, Thiyagarajah@DOT" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "Ellen Clarke ([email protected])" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, Mike Maltby <[email protected]> Cc: Fred Minagar <[email protected]>, Sean Sullivan <[email protected]>, Engineering <[email protected]>
Good Afternoon Everyone,
I have attached a copy of the presentation for the City of Big Bear Lake Local Road Safety Plan (LRSP) Stakeholder's Meeting that will be held on October 23, 2023 at 2:00pm. Please let us know if you have any questions. Hope to see you all remotely on Monday.

Thanks,
Katya Meyer
Project Manager
39707 Big Bear Blvd., PO Box 10000 Big Bear Lake, CA 92315 909.866.5831 Ext. 149 | www.citybigbearlake.com
Big Bear Lake City Hall is open Monday - Friday, from 8:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m.

From: Katya Meyer <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, October 5, 2023 5:17 PM
To: Yahya, Haissam S@DOT <[email protected]>; Sutharsan, Thiyagarajah@DOT <[email protected]>; [email protected]; Ellen Clarke ([email protected]) <[email protected]>; [email protected]; Mike Maltby <[email protected]>
Cc: Fred Minagar <[email protected]>; Sean Sullivan <[email protected]>; Engineering <[email protected]>
Subject: City of Big Bear Lake Local Road Safety Plan (LRSP) Stakeholder's Meeting- October 23rd at 2pm Dear Stakeholder,
The City of Big Bear Lake has contracted with Minagar & Associates, Inc. for the preparation of a Local Road Safety Plan (LRSP). The purpose of the LRSP is to identify and analyze intersections, and local roadways to provide proposed countermeasures to improve roadway safety. You have been identified as a key partner for traffic safety in the City of Big Bear Lake. We would like to invite you to a stakeholder’s meeting for a review and discussion of the LRSP, which will be presented to the City Council at a later meeting. In the link below, you will find a copy of the LRSP for you to review prior to the stakeholder’s meeting.

The meeting will be held remotely via Zoom on October 23, 2023 at 2:00pm, at the link below.

We hope that you can join us for the meeting. If you are unable to attend, please send us your comments and/or questions to [email protected] by 10am on October 23, 2023.

Attachments ( 9 files, 17.1 MB)
- image001.png (23.0 KB)
- image002.png (682.0 B)
- image003.png (670.0 B)
- image004.png (838.0 B)
- image755042.png (23.0 KB)
- image169660.png (682.0 B)
- image006812.png (670.0 B)
- image003862.png (838.0 B)
- Minagar & Associates, Inc. BBL LRSP Stakeholders' Presentation, 10.23.23.pdf (17.0 MB) Providing Professional Civil/Traffic Engineering Design & Transportation Planning Services:

Big Bear Lake’s Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP) Project Stakeholders’ Meeting
October 23, 2023
Presented to:

City of Big Bear Lake’s
Stakeholders
Presented by:

MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

City of Big Bear Lake’s Concentration of Collisions
(2017- 2021) Source: SWITRS & TIMS
City of Big Bear Lake Crash Ranking is # 30 (compared with 74 Peer Cities in California, according to the Office of Traffic Safety) Project Objective
Objective
Prepare a comprehensive Local Roadway Safety Plan that will allow the City of Big Bear Lake to identify potential traffic safety projects.

Santa San Bernardino County
Barbara
County
Los Angeles County Kings
County
Contra
Costa
County
3 City of Big Bear Lake’s OTS
Collisions Ranking
City of Big Bear Lake was Ranked:
#30 in Total Fatal and Injury (meaning at the
bottom 41% average compared with 74 Peer
Cities in CA in 2020)
#17 Composite (meaning Bottom 23% is poor
in comparison to 73 other Cities with similar
population in CA in 2020)
City of Big Bear Lake Crash Ranking is # 30
(compared with 74 Peer Cities in California,
according to the Office of Traffic Safety)
4 City of Big Bear Lake’s Collisions
by Cluster
City of Big Bear Lake’s Collisions by Cluster Map (Jan. 1, 2017 – Dec. 31, 2021)
Cluster of Collisions Scale
San Bernardino County
Big Bear Lake
5 City of Big Bear Lake’s Collisions
by Point
City of Big Bear Lake’s Collisions by Point Map (Jan. 1, 2017 – Dec. 31, 2021) Collisions by Crash Severity
State Route 18
San Bernardino County
Big Bear Lake
6 City of Big Bear Lake’s ATP
Crash Map
City of Big Bear Lake’s Active Transportation Program Crashes (ATP) Map (Jan. 1, 2017 – Dec. 31, 2021)
7 City of Big Bear Lake’s
Crash Severity
8 City of Big Bear Lake’s Crashes
by Type
9 Work Plan
Tasks Overview
Task Summary

1.) Project Management

2.) Data Collection

3.) Data Analysis

4.) Countermeasure Selection

5.) Develop Safety Projects

6.) Local Roadway Safety Plan Development
10 Work Plan
Top 10 State & Local Crash Intersections in Big Bear Lake 8 Collisions
#1 Big Bear Blvd at
Sandalwood Dr
0 Killed
0 Severe Injuries
3 Visible Injuries
1 Possible Injuries
4 Property Damage Only
State Intersection
Unsignalized
8 Collisions
#2 Big Bear Blvd
& Summit Blvd
0 Killed
0 Severe Injuries
3 Visible Injuries
1 Possible Injuries
4 Property Damage Only
State Intersection
Signalized
8 Collisions
#3 Big Bear Blvd
& Lakeview Dr.
0 Killed
0 Severe Injuries
0 Visible Injuries
1 Possible Injuries
7 Property Damage Only
State Intersection
Unsignalized
3 Collisions
#1 Lahontan Dr at
Mountainaire Ln
0 Killed
0 Severe Injuries
2 Visible Injuries
0 Possible Injuries
1 Property Damage Only
City Intersection
Unsignalized
3 Collisions
#2 Morningridge Rd
at Elm St
0 Killed
0 Severe Injuries
0 Visible Injuries
1 Possible Injuries
2 Property Damage Only
City Intersection
Unsignalized
Due to the City’s improvement project on Moonridge Road and Elm Street intersection, therefore, the recommended safety
countermeasures and benefit-cost-analysis will not be applied to this intersection.
2 Collisions
#3 Starvation Flats Rd
at Fox Farm Rd
0 Killed
0 Severe Injuries
1 Visible Injuries
1 Possible Injuries
0 Property Damage Only
City Intersection
Unsignalized
17 Work Plan
Top 5 State & Local Crash Roadway Segments
in Big Bear Lake
17 Collisions
#1 Big Bear Blvd (bw Stanfield Cutoff to Division St)
0 Killed
1 Severe Injuries
4 Visible Injuries
7 Possible Injuries
5 Property Damage Only
State & Local Roadway Segment
9 Collisions
#2 Big Bear Blvd (bw Sandalwood Dr to Starvation Flat Rd) 0 Killed
1 Severe Injuries
3 Visible Injuries
2 Possible Injuries
3 Property Damage Only
State & Local Roadway Segment
5 Collisions
#3 Big Bear Blvd (bw Fox Farm Rd to Lakeview Ctr)
1 Killed
0 Severe Injuries
0 Visible Injuries
4 Possible Injuries
0 Property Damage Only
State & Local Roadway Segment
21 Work Plan
LRSP Grant Funding Resources

1.) HSIP Cycle 12 (unknown)

2.) OTS Grants

3.) SB1

4.) Safe Routes & Roads for All (SS4A)

5.) Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA)

6.) Other Sources
22 Schedule
• 1.) NTP: July 25, 2022
• 2.) Develop Plan Goals & Objectives: Completed
• 3.) Establish Stakeholders: Completed
• 4.) Analyze Safety Data: Completed
• 5.) Develop Countermeasures: Completed
• 6.) Field Inspection: Completed
• 7.) Local Roadway Safety Plan Draft: Sept 1, 2022
• 8.) Local Roadway Safety Plan Final: Sept 21, 2023
• 9.) Final City Council Presentation: TBD in Oct./Nov 2023 23 Q/A

MEETING
DATE: February 14, 2024
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
THROUGH: Erik Sund, City Manager
FROM: Sean Sullivan, Assistant City Manager
Israel Gomez, Associate Engineer
SUBJECT: Resolution Approving a Trail Easement Agreement with Big Bear Mountain Resorts for Rathbun Creek Trail Phase III

BACKGROUND & DISCUSSION
The Rathbun Corridor Sustainability Plan identified a number of projects and improvements in the area, including the Rathbun Creek Trail. The Rathbun Creek Trail is intended to link the National Forest in the South end of the City with the Alpine Pedal Path in the North end of the City with a multiuse trail. Phase I of the project was constructed in 2021 and extended along Rathbun Creek from Big Bear Boulevard to Elm Street. Phase III of the project extends from Elm Street to Moonridge Road, along Rathbun Creek, and adjacent to Sonoma Drive. A substantial portion of the Phase III trail is constructed along property owned by Big Bear Mountain Resort (BBMR) APN: 2328-383-01. The Rathbun Creek Trail Phase III was completed in November 2023.

As a part of the development of the project, staff engaged in discussions with BBMR representatives about obtaining the necessary authorization to construct and operate a trail along the portion of their property. Upon receiving their agreement to support this project, counsel from both the City and BBMR began the process of drafting the necessary easement agreement for this project. The final Trail Easement Agreement, as agreed to by both entities, is presented for approval through this action.

As prepared, the attached Trail Easement Agreement (Agreement) allows the City of Big Bear Lake to construct, operate, and maintain a trail over property owned by the Big Bear Mountain Development Company, a subsidiary of BBMR and Alterra Mountain Company. The agreement stipulates that the trail may be used by the general public for recreational purposes and that the City shall be responsible for all maintenance and liabilities and to hold the grantor harmless. The terms of the easement agreement are consistent with other previously executed trail easement agreements that the City is party to with other grantors of easements.

Staff is seeking the City Council’s acceptance of the Agreement and authorization for the City Manager to sign the necessary acceptance of the documents. The Agreement will be recorded, through the San Bernardino County Recorder’s office, and will be permanently attached to the subject parcel of land.

Item 1.5

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with the securing of the trail easement as BBMR is not seeking any financial consideration for the granting of the easement. The associated engineering and legal fees for the completion of this effort are included within the adopted Fiscal Year 2023-24 Annual Budget. The construction of the trail project was included within the adopted Capital Improvement Program (CIP) budget and was funded with Measure Y proceeds.

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS
There is no environmental impact, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), associated with the approval of this easement. The necessary environmental findings, associated with this trail project, were made at the time that the construction contracts were approved by the City Council.

CONSIDERATION OF STRATEGIC PRIORITIES
This item aligns with the City Council’s Strategic Priority No. 1 as it “supports and invests in sustainable infrastructure projects and programs”.

RECOMMENDED ACTION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt a Resolution Approving a Trail Easement Agreement with Big Bear Mountain Resort for the Rathbun Creek Trial Phase III.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Resolution No. 2024-XX

2. Trail Easement Agreement
RESOLUTION NO. 2024-XX

RESOLUTION APPROVING A TRAIL EASEMENT AGREEMENT WITH BIG BEAR

MOUNTAIN RESORTS FOR RATHBUN CREEK TRAIL PHASE III
WHEREAS, the Rathbun Creek Sustainability Plan identified a number of projects and improvements in the area, including the Rathbun Creek Trail which is intended to link the National Forest to the Alpine Pedal Path with a multiuse trail; and, WHEREAS, the Rathbun Creek Trail has been constructed in phases, with Phase I being completed in 2021 and Phase III being constructed in 2023; and, WHEREAS, Phase III of the Rathbun Creek Trail constructed a multiuse trail from Elm Street to Moonridge Road along Sonoma Drive, within land owned by Big Bear Mountain Resort (BBMR) APN: 2328-383-01; and,
WHEREAS, as a part of the project development, staff engaged with BBMR representatives and obtained concurrence as to the authorization to construct and operate a trail along this portion of their property and counsel from both entities began developing a Trail Easement Agreement (Agreement); and,
WHEREAS, the proposed Agreement allows the City to construct, operate, and maintain a trail for public use over property owned by the Big Bear Mountain Development Company, a subsidiary of BBMR and Alterra Mountain company; and,
WHEREAS, the agreement stipulates that the City shall be responsible for all maintenance and liability and holding the grantor harmless and that there is no compensation due to BBMR for this easement access; and,
WHEREAS, the agreement has been developed, reviewed, and agreed to by counsel for both entities and the agreement is consistent with other trail easement agreements that the City has previously executed with other entities; and,
WHEREAS, upon approval of this agreement, the documents will be executed by the City Manager and the easement will be recorded against the subject property, where the easement will remain permanently attached to this parcel.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY the City Council of the City of Big Bear Lake that:

1. The Trail Easement Agreement between the City of Big Bear Lake and the Big Bear Mountain Development Co, a subsidiary of Big Bear Mountain Resort, is approved.

2. The City Manager is authorized to execute all related documents in a form approved by the City Attorney.

Item 1.5
Attachment 1

3. Once executed, the documents shall be forwarded to the San Bernardino County Recorder’s office for recordation.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of February, 2024.

Perri Melnick, Mayor
ATTEST:

Erica Stephenson, City Clerk

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) ss

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

Erica Stephenson, City Clerk
Item 1.5
Attachment 2

MEETING
DATE: February 14, 2024
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
THROUGH: Erik Sund, City Manager
FROM: Sean Sullivan, Assistant City Manager
Katya Meyer, Project Manager
SUBJECT: Resolution Authorizing Submittal of a Claim to the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority for Transportation Development Act Article 3 Funds for the Stanfield Marsh Outdoor Recreation and Education Trail Segment II (SMORE II) Project

BACKGROUND & DISCUSSION
The San Bernardino County Transportation Authority (SBCTA) administers funding for a variety of transportation programs and initiatives throughout San Bernardino County. The Transportation Development Act (TDA) of 1971 provides funding, administered by SBCTA, to be allocated for transit and non-transit related purposes in support of regional transportation plans. These funds are generated by the Local Transportation Fund (LTF) from a ¼ cent sales tax collected statewide and are distributed to each county on a per capita basis. Transportation Development Act (TDA) Article 3 is a program authorized to improve bicycle and pedestrian facilities.

On May 4, 2023 the SBCTA released the Call for Transportation Development Act (TDA) Article 3 Projects. City staff applied for 2023 TDA Article 3 funding in support of the Stanfield Marsh Outdoor Recreation and Education Trail Segment II (SMORE II) Project. The SMORE II project continues the recently constructed SMORE I trail by connecting the terminus of the trail east of the Stanfield Marsh Boardwalks to Division Drive. The project aims to enhance pedestrian and bicycle safety as well as increase connectivity with high visitation areas by linking east Big Bear Valley with the City of Big Bear Lake and the Alpine Pedal Path located on the north shore of Big Bear Lake.

Staff was notified in August 2023 that the SMORE II project would be recommended for funding in the amount of $303,518, approximately 50% of the estimated project cost. The funding award was approved by the SBCTA Board of Directors in October 2023.

The City must comply with all TDA provisions in order to request reimbursement for funds spent towards the project. These provisions include adopting an authorizing resolution within 6 months of project award notification, and designating the individual authorized to certify project completion. The attached resolution authorizes the City Manager to act as the authorized agent to certify project completion, and authorizes the filing of the claim form and submission of reimbursement requests throughout the duration of the project. The funding award is valid through Item 1.6
June 30, 2027. Staff is working with the intention of undertaking the construction of this project during the summer of 2024.

FISCAL IMPACT
The Stanfield Marsh Outdoor Recreation and Education Trail Segment II (SMORE II) Project has an estimated cost of $607,036. This grant award will assume approximately 50% of the project cost at $303,500. The remainder of the project will be funded through Measure Y proceeds, which are included in the adopted Five-Year Capital Improvement Project budget.

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS
This action is not subject to review pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

RECOMMENDED ACTION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt a Resolution Authorizing Submittal of a Claim to the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority for Transportation Development Act Article 3 Funds for the Stanfield Marsh Outdoor Recreation and Education Trail Segment II (SMORE II) Project.

ATTACHMENT

1. Resolution No. 2024-XX
RESOLUTION NO. 2024-XX

RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING SUBMITTAL OF A CLAIM TO THE

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY FOR
TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT ARTICLE 3 FUNDS FOR THE

STANFIELD MARSH OUTDOOR RECREATION AND EDUCATION

TRAIL SEGMENT II (SMORE II) PROJECT
WHEREAS, the Mills-Alquist-Deddeh Act (SB 325) was enacted by the California Legislature to improve existing public transportation services and encourage regional transportation coordination. Known as the Transportation Development Act (TDA) of 1971, this law provides funding to be allocated to transit and non-transit related purposes that comply with regional transportation plans; and
WHEREAS, TDA provides two funding sources, the Local Transportation Fund (LTF) and State Transit Assistance fund (STA); and
WHEREAS, LTF is derived from a ¼ cent of the general sales tax collected statewide and apportioned by population to areas within the county; and WHEREAS, STA is derived from the statewide sales tax on diesel fuel, plus an additional vehicle registration fee authorized under Senate Bill 1, referred to as the State of Good Repair, and both are apportioned by the State Controller’s Office 50% by population and 50% by transit operator revenues; and
WHEREAS, the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority (SBCTA) authorizes funding for a wide variety of transportation programs in San Bernardino County, including planning and program activities, pedestrian and bicycle facilities, community transit services, public transportation, and bus and rail projects to local transportation agencies through annual apportionment and allocation processes, and approves payments periodically throughout the year; and
WHEREAS, SBCTA awarded the City of Big Bear Lake TDA Article 3 grant funds in the amount of $303,518 for development of the Stanfield Marsh Outdoor Recreation and Education Trail Segment II (SMORE II) within the City of Big Bear Lake jurisdiction through a competitive “Call for Projects”; and
WHEREAS, TDA Article 3 grant funds are provided on a reimbursement basis; and WHEREAS, SBCTA requires the City of Big Bear Lake to submit a claim and request(s) for reimbursement; and
WHEREAS, submittal of the claim for TDA Article 3 funds must be first authorized by the City Council; and
WHEREAS, the Stanfield Marsh Outdoor Recreation and Education Trail Segment II (SMORE II) Project award is over $200,000, and is eligible for progress reimbursement, or under, and Item 1.6
Attachment 1
eligible for reimbursement at project completion; and
WHEREAS, SBCTA requires the designation of individuals authorized to certify Project completion; and
WHEREAS, the City Manager, or their designee, is authorized to certify project completion, and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Big Bear Lake authorizes submittal of a claim and request for reimbursement for the TDA Article 3 funds for the Stanfield Marsh Outdoor Recreation and Education Trail Segment II (SMORE II) Project in the amount of $303,518 and that the City Manager is authorized to certify project completion.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of February, 2024.

Perri Melnick, Mayor
ATTEST:

Erica Stephenson
City Clerk

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) ss

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:
_________________________
Erica Stephenson, City Clerk

MEETING
DATE: February 14, 2024
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
THROUGH: Erik Sund, City Manager
FROM: Sean Sullivan, Assistant City Manager
SUBJECT: Notices of Completion for Fiscal Year 2023-24 Capital Improvement Projects

BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION
Work has been completed on six (6) of the Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) that have been undertaken by the Public Works Department for Fiscal Year 2023-24. The time is appropriate for the City Council to accept the work as complete and direct the filing of Notices of Completion. • City Hall Roof Restoration Project
Contractor: Final Touch Construction & Design, Inc.

Date of Completion: January 26, 2024
Approved contact amount $996,047.57 (Includes $125,000 contingency) Total Project Expenditures $871,047.57
• Sanitary Sewer Cleaning & CCTV Inspection Project
Contractor: Houston and Harris PCS, Inc.

Date of Completion: December 1, 2023
Approved contact amount $265,852.85 (Includes $25,000 contingency) Total Project Expenditures $240,852.85
• Cottage Lane Sewer Line Replacement Project
Contractor: Romans Construction Co.

Date of Completion: January 26, 2024
Approved contact amount $151,329.00 (Includes $30,000 contingency) Total Project Expenditures $149,829.00
• Replacement of the Perimeter Fence at the 19-Acre Property Contractor: EverFence Corporation
Date of Completion: January 25, 2024
Approved contact amount $74,100.00
Total Project Expenditures $71,547.00
Item 1.7
• Purchase and Installation of Backup Generator for Sewer Lift Station No. 12 Contractor: Big Bear Electric
Date of Completion: January 26, 2024
Approved contact amount $65,731.00
Total Project Expenditures $65,731.00
• Emergency Repairs of Sanitary Sewer Lift Station No. 12 Contractor: Big Bear Electric
Date of Completion: January 26, 2024
Approved contact amount $35,053.00
Total Project Expenditures $35,053.00
Upon approval by the City Council, staff will proceed to record the Notices of Completion with the San Bernardino County Recorder’s Office. No sooner than thirty-five (35) days from the recording, staff will release all project retention funds assuming that no claims are made against the contractor related to these projects. For each of these projects, retention funds are 5% of the total project billing.

FISCAL IMPACT
These projects were all funded and included within the adopted Fiscal Year 2023-24 Annual Budget. At the time of contract award, the City Council approved contract amounts inclusive of the contractor’s bid as well as additional contingency funds when requested. As indicated within the report, these projects were completed within the City Council approved expenditure limits.

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS
At the time of authorizing the bid solicitation, the City Council found these projects to all be categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

RECOMMENDED ACTION
It is recommended that the City Council accept the City Hall Roof Restoration, Sanitary Sewer Cleaning & CCTV Inspection, Cottage Lane Sewer Line Replacement, Replacement of the Perimeter Fence at the 19-Acre Property, Purchase and Installation of Backup Generator for Sewer Lift Station No. 12 and Emergency Repairs of Sanitary Sewer Lift Station No. 12 projects as complete and authorize staff to file the required Notices of Completion for these contracted projects.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Agenda Report for Award of Contract for City Hall Roof Restoration Project (June 14, 2023)

2. Sanitary Sewer Cleaning & CCTV Inspection Project (August 9, 2023)

3. Agenda Report for Award of Contract for Cottage Lane Sewer Line Replacement Project (September 13, 2023)

4. Agenda Report for Award of Contract for Replacement of the Perimeter Fence at the 19- Acre Property (July 12, 2023)

5. Agenda Report for Award of Contract for Purchase and Installation of Backup Generator for Sewer Lift Station No. 12 (October 4, 2021)

6. Agenda Report for Award of Contract for Emergency Repairs of Sanitary Sewer Lift Station No. 12 (November 8, 2023)

7. Notices of Completion for Referenced Projects

MEETING
DATE: June 14, 2023
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
THROUGH: Erik Sund, City Manager
FROM: Sean Sullivan, Director of Public Services
Israel Gomez-Rosales, Associate Engineer
SUBJECT: Resolution Awarding a Construction Contract to Final Touch Construction & Design, Inc. for the Civic Center Roof Replacement Project

BACKGROUND
The City’s Civic Center and Performing Arts Center is an approximately 40,000 square foot municipal facility that hosts the City’s administrative offices, public services and meetings, and a 400-seat performing arts center auditorium. The facility was constructed in 1988 and the current roof is estimated to be twenty (20) years old or more. Within the past year, the roof has demonstrated signs of failure with leaks occurring throughout the building and visual evidence of roof material pulling up from the building.

The proposed Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Budget for Fiscal Year 2023-24 includes funding to remove and replace the existing roof at this facility. Staff has designed a project to replace the existing asphalt shingle roof, in kind, and including the necessary ice and water shield and snow melting system required by our weather conditions. Staff has undertaken a public bid process, which was authorized by the City Council for this project in April 2023, and it is recommended that the City Council award a construction contract at this time.

DISCUSSION
The construction of the Civic Center facility was completed in 1988 and the current roof on the building is estimated to be at least twenty (20) years old. For the past year or more, leaks have appeared throughout the building as well as other indicators that the roof is ready for replacement, such as existing roof material beginning to pull off of the building. The current roofing material is asphalt shingle and there is a snow melt system and some ice/water barrier within the existing construction.

Staff prepared project plans and specifications for the roof replacement to replace the roof in-kind with the current iterations of the materials and technology. Staff has specified asphalt shingles with a similar color and appearance as the existing and the new shingles will have a guarantee of forty (40) years. An ice and water shield, which is a plastic material placed between the plywood roof sheeting and the roofing material to prevent water intrusion, has been specified to be installed across the entire roof for additional protection. Per standard building requirements, the ice and water shield is only required for approximately 8’ from the edge of the roof based upon likely areas Item 1.7
Attachment 1
of snow accumulation. The addition of this barrier across the entire roof will prevent the conditions presently being experienced with leaks and prolong the lifespan of the roof. Finally, a snow melt system has been designed to cover the critical areas of snow accumulation, which are the eaves and valleys, to assist in mitigating the impact of snow on the roof. In addition to these key project features, the specifications also call for the replacement of some of the existing plywood sheeting and those quantities will be adjusted either up or down based upon the condition of the wood once the existing roofing material is removed. Finally, the project calls for the installation of new gutters and downspouts as well as the replacement of existing fascia, wood trim, and other decorative pieces that have been previously damaged and will be impacted by this work. The engineer’s estimate for this scope of work was $676,200.

Staff proceeded with the public bid process in accordance with the California Public Contract Code and the City of Big Bear Lake purchasing guidelines. On Thursday, May 11, the City received, publicly opened, and read aloud four (4) sealed bids with the following results:

Company Location Base Bid
Final Touch Construction & Design, Inc. Fontana, CA $ 871,047.57 Roofing by Eric Seaman Big Bear City, CA $1,100,000.00
Rite-Way Roof Corporation Fontana, CA $1,412,598.30
Danny Letner, Inc. DBA Letner Roofing Company Orange, CA $1,486,023.06 Upon inspecting the bid documents, the bid of Roofing by Eric Seaman was found to be nonresponsive as it was submitted on the contractor’s proposal form rather than the required City bid forms. The bid was not completed pursuant to the bid item schedule required by the City nor did it include any form of bid security. As such, staff has found that bid as nonresponsive and it has been disqualified from consideration.

Staff reviewed the three other bids for completeness and accuracy and reviewed the background and experience of Final Touch Construction & Design, Inc., the apparent low bidder, for relevant experience and capacity to complete this project. Staff has contacted the references provided by the contractor, including the City of Fontana and the County of San Bernardino Housing Authority, and received favorable feedback relative to the roofing experience of Final Touch Construction & Design, Inc. Furthermore, staff contacted the provided private sector references with similar feedback. Staff has had multiple discussions with the staff from Final Touch Construction & Design, Inc. and is satisfied with their background, experience and capacity to be awarded this construction contract.

In addition to the base bid amount of $871,047, staff is seeking the authorization of an additional contingency amount of $125,000 (approximately 15%) to cover the cost of any unforeseen conditions or additional work that becomes necessary throughout the course of this project. As the roof is removed, it is possible that conditions may exist that were not captured or assumed during the design and review process.

Staff anticipates that work on this project will commence in July 2023 and be completed by the end of September 2023.

FISCAL IMPACT
Funding for this project is included within the proposed Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for Fiscal Year 2023-24 in the amount of $1,000,000. The total requested contract award, including contingency funds, is $996,047.57.

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS
At the time of authorizing the bid solicitation, the City Council found this project to be categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15301.a Existing Facilities as repair and maintenance of existing public facility with no expansion of use.

RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution entitled Resolution Awarding a Construction Contract to Final Touch Construction & Design, Inc. for the Civic Center Roof Replacement Project.

ATTACHMENT

1. Resolution No. 2023-XX

MEETING
DATE: August 9, 2023
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
THROUGH: Erik Sund, City Manager
FROM: Sean Sullivan, Deputy City Manager/Director of Public Works Jason Watterson, Public Works Operations Manager
Jacky Chan, Associate Civil Engineer
SUBJECT: Resolution Awarding a Construction Contract to Houston & Harris PCS, Inc. for the Sanitary Sewer Cleaning and CCTV Inspection Project

BACKGROUND & DISCUSSION
The City’s Sanitary Sewer System includes approximately 200 miles of sewer mains of varying sizes and construction materials. A key element of the City’s sewer maintenance program is the routine cleaning and video inspection of the sewer mains. The cleaning prevents blockages and interruptions to flow and the video inspection allows staff to observe the condition of the mains which is used in the planning of future projects and improvements. In an effort to support the work of Sanitation Division staff, funding was included in the Fiscal Year 2023-24 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) budget for contractual support with sanitary sewer cleaning and inspection. The proposed project will allow for the cleaning and inspection of approximately 15 miles of sewer mains in the Moonridge area.

Staff conducted a public bid process, consistent with our practices for CIPs, and on July 27, 2023, the City received, publicly opened, and read aloud five (5) sealed bids with the following result:

Contractor Location Bid Amount
Houston & Harris PCS, Inc. San Bernardino, CA $240,852.85 Faze 1 Corp DBA Premier Pipe, Inc. Upland, CA $249,472.48 APS Environmental, Inc. North Highlands, CA $314,801.80 Nor-Cal Pipeline Services Roseville, CA $362,736.57
Downstream Services, Inc. Escondido, CA $372,746.87
Staff has reviewed the bid documents for completeness and accuracy and has found the submittal of Houston & Harris PCS, Inc. to be the lowest responsive bid for this project. Houston & Harris PCS, Inc. has an extensive resume of completing similar work assignments across Southern California, including work with the Big Bear Area Regional Wastewater Agency (BBARWA).

Upon an award of contract, it is anticipated that work on this effort will commence in early September and the work will be completed under the direction and supervision of Sanitation Division staff.

Item 1.7
Attachment 2

FISCAL IMPACT
The adopted Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for Fiscal Year 2023-24 includes funding for the Sanitary Sewer Cleaning and CCTV Inspection Project. The funding is derived from the Sanitation Fund. Staff is recommending the award of contract in the amount of the base bid price as well as an additional contingency fund of $25,000 (approximately 10%) to cover the cost of any unforeseen conditions that may arise throughout the course of construction or accommodate any additional work that needs to be completed through this scope of work. The total contract award, including contingency funds, will be in the amount of $265,852.85.

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATION
At the time that this project was authorized for bid, the City Council found that it is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15301.B Existing Facilities as the operation, repair, and maintenance of public owned utilities.

CONSIDERATION OF STRATEGIC PRIORITIES
This item aligns with the City Council’s Strategic Priorities as it supports sustainable infrastructure projects consistent with the needs of our community.

RECOMMENDED ACTION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution (attachment 1) entitled:

Resolution Awarding a Construction Contract to Houston & Harris PCS, Inc. for the Sanitary Sewer Cleaning and CCTV Inspection Project.

Attachment:

1. Resolution No. 2023-XX

MEETING
DATE: September 13, 2023
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
THROUGH: Erik Sund, City Manager
FROM: Sean Sullivan, Deputy City Manager/Director of Public Works Jared Cheek, Public Works Manager – Capital Projects/Emergency Operations Israel Gomez, Associate Civil Engineer
SUBJECT: Resolution Awarding a Construction Contract to Romans Construction Co. for the Cottage Lane Sewer Line Replacement Project

BACKGROUND & DISCUSSION
The City’s Sanitary Sewer System includes approximately 200 miles of sewer mains of varying sizes and construction materials. Recently, staff identified an existing City sewer main which provides sewer collection to a number of businesses that is in need of replacement. The sewer main is an 8” concrete main that is very dated and in disrepair; the main is impacted by tree roots and partial collapses requiring that it be replaced. Approximately five (5) commercial properties tie into this main that connects to Cottage Lane.

Engineering staff worked with the team from the Sanitation Division as well as a consulting engineer to design a project that constructs a new sewer main in the area and will reconnect all existing commercial properties to it with extended sewer laterals. Given the existing location, and the impact from surrounding trees, the existing sewer main will be severed from the properties and the sewer system, capped, and abandoned in place.

Staff conducted a public bid process, consistent with our practices for CIPs, and on August 31, 2023, staff received, publicly opened, and read aloud eight (8) sealed bids with the following result:

Contractor Location Bid Amount
Romans Construction Co. Big Bear Lake, CA $121,329
Bear Valley Paving Big Bear Lake, CA $143,979
S. Porter, Inc. Big Bear Lake, CA $188,630
Issa Electric, Inc. Riverside, CA $193,884
Borden Excavating, Inc. Calimesa, CA $195,123
RE Chaffee Construction, Inc. Wrightwood, CA $212,487
Gentry General Engineering, Inc. Rancho Cucamonga, CA $226,619 Kemcorp Construction, Inc. Ontario, CA $246,000
Staff has reviewed the bid documents for completeness and accuracy and has found the submittal of Romans Construction Co. to be the lowest responsive bid for this project. Romans Construction Item 1.7
Attachment 3
Co. is a well established general engineering contractor that has been working in the Big Bear Valley for decades and has an extensive record of satisfactorily completing construction projects for the City of Big Bear Lake. Romans Construction is currently working on the Stanfield Parking Lot Project, previously completed the Jay Bird Lane Sewer Main Replacement Project, and regularly performs routine repairs and maintenance on the City’s sewer system.

Upon an award of contract, it is anticipated that work on this effort will commence in early October and take approximately four (4) weeks to complete. Construction will be completed under the supervision of City staff from the Engineering and Sanitation Divisions.

Staff is recommending an award of contract in the amount of the base bid, $121,329, as well as a contingency amount of $30,000 (approximately 25%) to cover the cost of any unforeseen conditions or expenses that may arise throughout the course of construction. Staff is requesting the additional contingency amount, in particular, due to the costs that may arise from extending and reconnecting the private sewer laterals to the new sewer main.

FISCAL IMPACT
Funding for the Cottage Lane Sewer Replacement Project is included within the adopted Fiscal Year 2023-24 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) budget. The project is budgeted for $200,000 with funding coming from the Sanitation Fund. The total contract award, including a $30,000 contingency fund, is $151,329.

CONSIDERATION OF STRATEGIC PRIORITIES
This project aligns with Strategic Priority No. 1, “support and invest in sustainable infrastructure projects and programs consistent with the needs of our community”.

RECOMMENDED ACTION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution (attachment 1) entitled:

Resolution Awarding a Construction Contract to Romans Construction Co. for the Cottage Lane Sewer Line Replacement Project.

Attachment:

1. Resolution No. 2023-XX

MEETING
DATE:

TO:

THROUGH:

FROM:

SUBJECT:

July 12, 2023
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
Erik Sund, City Manager
Sean Sullivan, Deputy City Manager/Director of Public Works Israel Gomez, Associate Engineer
Resolution Authorizing a Construction Contract with EverFence Corporation for Replacement of the Perimeter Fence at the 19-Acre Property

BACKGROUND
Effective August 1, 2022, the City executed a 99-year ground lease on 19-acres of property that is owned by the Bear Valley Mutual Water Company. Pursuant to the ground lease, the City now has the controlling interest in the entire property that includes a 59-space mobile home park, two restaurant spaces, residential properties, and vast open space. Since the lease became effective, the City has been working to manage and maintain the property while it initiates a master planning process to identify the vision for the property going forward. Some of the efforts that have been undertaken include the demolition of an abandoned building, tree trimming and cleanup throughout the property, and responding to the needs of the tenants.

The existing perimeter fence that fronts Big Bear Boulevard is dilapidated and failing given its age and overall condition. Additionally, given the heavy snow accumulation this winter, portions of it were further damaged by snow removal activities. Staff is proposing to replace the existing perimeter fence along the front of the property to include aesthetics and safety as well as increasing privacy for the residents.

DISCUSSION
The 19-acre property has significant frontage along Big Bear Boulevard and Alden Road and there is an existing perimeter fence along most of these frontages. The existing fencing is a combination of chain link and other miscellaneous materials that is aged and falling into disrepair. Staff has developed plans for the replacement of this fencing to improve the aesthetic appearance and safety of the site as well as improving privacy for the tenants within the mobile home park.

The fence fronting Big Bear Boulevard will be replaced with a typical wooden panel fence that is 6’ tall. This fence will also wrap around a portion of Alden Road. The wooden fence will follow the existing fence line and will promote privacy for the mobile home park and aesthetic improvement. Additionally, the shorter miscellaneous chain link fences along the property frontage will all be removed and a new round rail fence will be installed along the property line.

The round rail fence will match the existing type that is used elsewhere in the City and will further improve the appearance of the property frontage.

Item 1.7
Attachment 4
Staff contacted vendors that had previously proposed on the two (2) fencing projects that the City has completed in the recent years to receive proposals for this work. A summary of the proposals received is as follows:

Contractor Location Bid Amount
EverFence Corporation Santa Fe Springs, CA $ 74,100.00
Red Hawk Services, Inc. Perris, CA $ 86,163.40
Golden Bay Fence Plus Iron Works, Inc. Stockton, CA $ 97,444.00 S. Porter, Inc. Big Bear Lake, CA $119,088.00
Quality Fence Co, Inc. Paramount, CA $139,640.00
Harris Steel Fence Company Los Angeles, CA $536,403.00
Staff reviewed the proposals for completeness and investigated the background and experience of the proposers. EverFence Corporation recently completed the Knickerbocker Channel Fence Replacement Project for the City and staff is satisfied with their work. The project was completed within the established schedule and budget for the project.

Upon approval of this agreement, staff will coordinate the work to commence as soon as possible.

It is anticipated that this work will be completed within thirty (30) days once initiated. Staff will coordinate with the contractor and Caritas, the manager of the Leisure Bear Mobile Home Park, to provide outreach and information to the residents who may be impacted by this project.

FISCAL IMPACT
The necessary funding for this effort is included within the adopted Fiscal Year 2023-24 Budget.

This budget includes a section for Property Lease General Operations and includes funding from Measure Y proceeds for the maintenance and improvement of this property.

CONSIDERATION OF STRATEGIC PRIORITIES
This item aligns with the City Council’s Strategic Priorities as it supports sustainable infrastructure projects consistent with the needs of our community.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
This project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15301 Existing Facilities as a repair or alteration of an existing facility with no expansion of use.

RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the proposed Resolution Authorizing a Construction Contract with EverFence Corporation for Replacement of the Perimeter Fence at the 19-Acre Property.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Resolution No. 2023-XX

2. CEQA Notice of Exemption

MEETING
DATE: October 4, 2021
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
THROUGH: Frank A. Rush, Jr., City Manager
FROM: Sean Sullivan, Director of Public Services
Jason Watterson, Public Works Operations Manager
SUBJECT: Resolution Authorizing Purchase and Installation of Backup Generator for Sewer Lift Station No. 12 and Finding the Project Exempt from CEQA

BACKGROUND
The City’s Sanitation Division is responsible for the maintenance of the sanitary sewer system which includes approximately 200 miles of sewer main, more than 3,000 manholes, and 12 sewer lift stations. The sewer lift stations, also known as pumping stations, move wastewater throughout the City’s sanitary sewer system and ultimately deposit it in larger trunk lines managed by the Big Bear Area Regional Wastewater Agency. The lift stations are critical resources to keep the wastewater moving through the system and prevent overflows. Given the vital nature of these resources, the City has ensured that redundant electricity is available at each of these sites, either through built-in emergency generators or electrical connections to receive power from portable generators.

In June 2021, the City Council adopted a 5-Year Capital Replacement / Improvement Program, which plans capital spending through FY 2025-26. The capital plan includes an annual allocation for the replacement of backup generating systems at the City’s sewer lift stations at a rate of one station per year. The replacement is necessary due to the age, functionality and maintenance concerns, and environmental regulations. For FY 2021-22, staff’s plan is to replace the system at Station No. 12, which is in the western portion of the City on Cove Drive. Staff is recommending that the City Council authorize the proposed purchase order and agreement to support the completion of this project.

DISCUSSION
As the City’s sanitary sewer system relies heavily upon the functionality of the lift stations, efforts have been made to ensure that each site has access to redundant electricity sources to ensure reliability of operation even during power outages. Of the twelve (12) pump stations, nine (9) have automatic backup generators and three (3) maintain the appropriate connections to accept power from the City’s portable generators. Funding is included in the approved capital plan to replace one existing backup generator per year in each of the covered years. For FY 2021-22, staff is proposing to replace the existing generator at Station No. 12. The existing generator at Station No. 12 is thirty-nine (39) years old, has exceeded its functional and useful life, its reliability is diminishing, and maintenance and sourcing of parts have become challenging. In addition, due to Item 1.7
Attachment 5
the age of the generator, the system no longer meets the standards set by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (AQMD) related to air quality for generators.

To improve efficiency, namely in operational familiarity, maintenance, and the sourcing of parts, staff has standardized Kohler generators for lift stations and facility uses. The current Kohler generators are appropriately sized to meet the operating needs of the City and meet or exceed all AQMD regulations and standards. As the City is a member agency of Sourcewell, which is a national purchasing collective for use by government agencies for the purchase of goods and services, the City is able to purchase the generator and associated components at a competitively bid contract price. Sourcewell has a contract for the distribution of the necessary Kohler generator available through Bay City Electric Works (Contract No. 120617-KOH), Poway, CA, which offers a price of approximately 30% below list price. The proposal furnished for the generator, automatic transfer switch, fuel tank, freight, and on-site start up is $36,548.

While the generator distributor will provide onsite start up, the generator needs to be installed by a licensed electrical contractor. The City of Big Bear Lake maintains two (2) on-call electrical contractors who are based within the Big Bear Valley and are licensed to provide electrical services. These firms were contacted to provide a proposal on a scope of work that includes the removal of the existing equipment and the installation of the new, city-furnished generator, automatic transfer switch, and fuel tank. The work includes all necessary electrical connections and installation of the appropriate exhaust components. Ludecke’s Electrical Service, Big Bear City, CA, declined to submit a proposal for the work due to a lack of availability given their current workload. Big Bear Electric, Big Bear City, CA, proposed a price of $29,183 to complete the full scope of work which includes all labor, equipment, and materials. Staff recommends an agreement with Big Bear Electric as described above.

FISCAL IMPACT
The total cost for the purchase and installation of the generator equipment will be $65,731. The adopted budget for this project is $75,000 in the Sanitation Fund.

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS
This project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Section 15301.b as repair or maintenance of an existing utility system.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Resolution No. 2021-XX

2. Location Map

3. CEQA Notice of Exemption

MEETING
DATE: November 8, 2023
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
THROUGH: Erik Sund, City Manager
FROM: Sean Sullivan, Deputy City Manager / Director of Public Works Jason Watterson, Public Works Manager – Field Operations / Utilities SUBJECT: Resolution Ratifying Expenditures Associated with Emergency Repairs of Sanitary Sewer Lift Station No. 12

BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION
Among the assets that make up the City’s sanitary sewer system are twelve (12) sewer lift stations, also known as pump stations, that move wastewater throughout the City’s system. The lift stations ultimately move the wastewater into the larger wastewater treatment system managed by the Big Bear Area Regional Wastewater Agency (BBARWA). The lift stations are critical elements of the City’s system as the movement of wastewater prevents sewer overflows.

During recent routine maintenance activities, staff identified issues within the electrical system that services Lift Station No. 12. Lift Station No. 12 is located on Cove Drive and pumps the wastewater collected in the surrounding neighborhoods into a large trunk line that runs along the lake. Troubleshooting of the issue identified that the existing, underground electrical conduit is corroded allowing water intrusion into the electrical system, resulting in electrical shorts and unsafe conditions. As we approach the winter season, the conduit, wiring, and electrical system enclosures must be replaced to prevent water intrusion, resulting from rain or snow, which would hinder the normal operation of this critical system. If this work is not completed prior to the winter season, it is likely that the problem will persist or get worse and that the lift station will not operate appropriately during the winter season, which generally strains the sanitary sewer system due to inflow and infiltration concerns related to precipitation.

Staff contacted two local electricians, Ludecke Electric Service and Big Bear Electric, with whom the City has frequently worked with. Ludecke indicated that they were not positioned to complete this assignment at this time. Big Bear Electric has inspected the job and provided staff with a proposal of $35,053. They have the personnel resources and access to the necessary equipment to undertake this work immediately. As of the posting of this agenda, work is anticipated to begin during the week of November 6 and would be completed in approximately four (4) working days.

Big Bear Electric is a well-established electric service provider with a focus on commercial, industrial, and public electrical work with an expertise in pumps and motor controls, such as sewer lift stations. Big Bear Electric has previously performed similar work for the City of Big Bear Lake.

Item 1.7
Attachment 6
Pursuant to the City’s Bid Policy and Procedure (No. 1986-36), this situation is considered an emergency whereby the failure of a sanitary sewer lift station could threaten public health and welfare. Under these circumstances, the City’s competitive bid procedures do not apply.

Adherence to the bid procedures, within this instance, may further an emergency scenario due to the time required to conduct a public bid.

FISCAL IMPACT
Funding for these repairs is available within the adopted Fiscal Year 2023-24 Annual Operating Budget within the Sanitation Fund.

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS
This project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15301.b Existing Facilities of the CEQA implementation guidelines as repair and maintenance of a publicly-owned utility system.

CONSIDERATION OF STRATEGIC PRIORITIES
This item aligns with the City Council’s Strategic Priority No. 1 as it “supports and invests in sustainable infrastructure projects and programs”.

RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt a Resolution Ratifying Expenditures Associated with Emergency Repairs of Sanitary Sewer Lift Station No. 12.

ATTACHMENT

1. Resolution No. 2023-XX

2. Bid Policy and Procedure (No. 1986-36)

3. Proposal of Big Bear Electric, Inc.

RECORDING REQUESTED BY:

City of Big Bear Lake
WHEN RECORDED, PLEASE MAIL TO:

City of Big Bear Lake
City Clerk
PO Box 10000
Big Bear Lake, CA 92315
SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER’S USE

NOTICE OF COMPLETION
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT:

The undersigned is OWNER or agent of the OWNER of the interest or estate state below in the property hereinafter described:

The FULL NAME of the OWNER is: CITY OF BIG BEAR LAKE
The FULL ADDRESS OF THE owner is: 39707 BIG BEAR BOULEVARD, PO BOX 10000, BIG BEAR LAKE, CA 92315
The NATURE of the INTEREST or ESTATE of the undersigned is: agent of the owner that constructed the improvements.

The full name(s) and address(es) of all persons, if any, who hold such interest or estate with the undersigned as joint tenants or as tenants in common are:

NAME(S) ADDRESS(ES)
The full name(s) and address(es) of the successor(s) in interest of the undersigned if the property was transferred subsequent to the commencement of the work of improvement herein referred to:

NAME(S) ADDRESS(ES)
A work of improvement on the property hereinafter described was completed on: January 26, 2024 The work of improvement completed is described as follows: City Hall Roof Restoration Project.

The NAME OF THE ORIGINAL CONTRACTORS, if any, for such work of improvement is: Final Touch Construction & Design, Inc.

The street address of said property is: 39707 BIG BEAR BOULEVARD, BIG BEAR LAKE, CA 92315 APN:030711141
The property on which said work of improvement was completed is in the City of Big Bear Lake, County of San Bernardino, State of California.

Dated: 02/14/2024
Sean Sullivan, Public Works Department, City of Big Bear Lake

VERIFICATION
I, Sean Sullivan, am the Director of Public Services, the declarant of the foregoing Notice of Completion. I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct.

Executed on 02/14/2024 at Big Bear Lake, CA.

Sean Sullivan, Public Works Department, City of Big Bear Lake Item 1.7
Attachment 7
RECORDING REQUESTED BY:

City of Big Bear Lake
WHEN RECORDED, PLEASE MAIL TO:

City of Big Bear Lake
City Clerk
PO Box 10000
Big Bear Lake, CA 92315
SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER’S USE

NOTICE OF COMPLETION
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT:

The undersigned is OWNER or agent of the OWNER of the interest or estate state below in the property hereinafter described:

The full name(s) and address(es) of all persons, if any, who hold such interest or estate with the undersigned as joint tenants or as tenants in common are:

NAME(S) ADDRESS(ES)
A work of improvement on the property hereinafter described was completed on: December 1, 2023 The work of improvement completed is described as follows: Sanitary Sewer Cleaning & CCTV Inspection Project.

The NAME OF THE ORIGINAL CONTRACTORS, if any, for such work of improvement is: Houston and Harris PCS, Inc.

The street address of said property is: VARIOUS STREETS WITHIN THE CITY OF BIG BEAR LAKE, NO APN The property on which said work of improvement was completed is in the City of Big Bear Lake, County of San Bernardino, State of California.

Dated: 02/14/2024
Sean Sullivan, Public Works Department, City of Big Bear Lake

Executed on 02/14/2024 at Big Bear Lake, CA.

Sean Sullivan, Public Works Department, City of Big Bear Lake RECORDING REQUESTED BY:

City of Big Bear Lake
WHEN RECORDED, PLEASE MAIL TO:

City of Big Bear Lake
City Clerk
PO Box 10000
Big Bear Lake, CA 92315
SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER’S USE

NOTICE OF COMPLETION
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT:

The undersigned is OWNER or agent of the OWNER of the interest or estate state below in the property hereinafter described:

The full name(s) and address(es) of all persons, if any, who hold such interest or estate with the undersigned as joint tenants or as tenants in common are:

NAME(S) ADDRESS(ES)
A work of improvement on the property hereinafter described was completed on: January 26, 2024 The work of improvement completed is described as follows: Cottage Lane Sewer Line Replacement Project.

The NAME OF THE ORIGINAL CONTRACTORS, if any, for such work of improvement is: Romans Construction Co.

Dated: 02/14/2024
Sean Sullivan, Public Works Department, City of Big Bear Lake

Executed on 02/14/2024 at Big Bear Lake, CA.

Sean Sullivan, Public Works Department, City of Big Bear Lake RECORDING REQUESTED BY:

City of Big Bear Lake
WHEN RECORDED, PLEASE MAIL TO:

City of Big Bear Lake
City Clerk
PO Box 10000
Big Bear Lake, CA 92315
SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER’S USE

NOTICE OF COMPLETION
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT:

The undersigned is OWNER or agent of the OWNER of the interest or estate state below in the property hereinafter described:

The full name(s) and address(es) of all persons, if any, who hold such interest or estate with the undersigned as joint tenants or as tenants in common are:

NAME(S) ADDRESS(ES)
A work of improvement on the property hereinafter described was completed on: January 25, 2024 The work of improvement completed is described as follows: Replacement of the Perimeter Fence at the 19-Acre Property.

The NAME OF THE ORIGINAL CONTRACTORS, if any, for such work of improvement is: EverFence Corporation.

The street address of said property is: 547 Alden Rd, Big Bear Lake, CA 92315, APN:030901119 The property on which said work of improvement was completed is in the City of Big Bear Lake, County of San Bernardino, State of California.

Dated: 02/14/2024
Sean Sullivan, Public Works Department, City of Big Bear Lake

Executed on 02/14/2024 at Big Bear Lake, CA.

Sean Sullivan, Public Works Department, City of Big Bear Lake RECORDING REQUESTED BY:

City of Big Bear Lake
WHEN RECORDED, PLEASE MAIL TO:

City of Big Bear Lake
City Clerk
PO Box 10000
Big Bear Lake, CA 92315
SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER’S USE

NOTICE OF COMPLETION
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT:

The undersigned is OWNER or agent of the OWNER of the interest or estate state below in the property hereinafter described:

The full name(s) and address(es) of all persons, if any, who hold such interest or estate with the undersigned as joint tenants or as tenants in common are:

NAME(S) ADDRESS(ES)
A work of improvement on the property hereinafter described was completed on: January 26, 2024 The work of improvement completed is described as follows: Emergency Repairs of Sanitary Sewer Lift Station No. 12.

The NAME OF THE ORIGINAL CONTRACTORS, if any, for such work of improvement is: Big Bear Electric.

The street address of said property is: Cove Landing, Big Bear Lake, CA 92315, no APN The property on which said work of improvement was completed is in the City of Big Bear Lake, County of San Bernardino, State of California.

Dated: 02/14/2024
Sean Sullivan, Public Works Department, City of Big Bear Lake

Executed on 02/14/2024 at Big Bear Lake, CA.

Sean Sullivan, Public Works Department, City of Big Bear Lake RECORDING REQUESTED BY:

City of Big Bear Lake
WHEN RECORDED, PLEASE MAIL TO:

City of Big Bear Lake
City Clerk
PO Box 10000
Big Bear Lake, CA 92315
SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER’S USE

NOTICE OF COMPLETION
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT:

The undersigned is OWNER or agent of the OWNER of the interest or estate state below in the property hereinafter described:

The full name(s) and address(es) of all persons, if any, who hold such interest or estate with the undersigned as joint tenants or as tenants in common are:

The NAME OF THE ORIGINAL CONTRACTORS, if any, for such work of improvement is: Big Bear Electric.

Dated: 02/14/2024
Sean Sullivan, Public Works Department, City of Big Bear Lake

Executed on 02/14/2024 at Big Bear Lake, CA.

Sean Sullivan, Public Works Department, City of Big Bear Lake

MEETING
DATE: February 14, 2024
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
THROUGH: Erik Sund, City Manager
FROM: Sean Sullivan, Assistant City Manager
Jared Cheek, Public Works Manager – Capital Projects/Emergency Operations Israel Gomez-Rosales, Associate Civil Engineer
SUBJECT: Authorization of Bid Solicitations for Upcoming Capital Improvement Projects and Finding the Projects Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act

BACKGROUND
The Fiscal Year 2023-24 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) budget includes approximately twenty-six (26) projects or initiatives focused on investment in streets, facilities parks, trails, facilities, sanitation, and equipment infrastructure throughout the City. The anticipated capital investment for Fiscal Year 2023-24, based upon the adopted CIP budget, is greater than $9.8 million.

The City’s purchasing guidelines require that the City Council provide authorization to the staff to proceed with bidding activities for the proposed capital improvement projects. This report includes a summary overview of each project to initiate the bidding activities. Additionally, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City Council is required to approve a finding related to each project which, for these projects, will all be categorical exemptions.

Upon approval of the proposed resolution, staff will undertake the bid solicitations in accordance with the City’s purchasing policy and all other applicable regulations. As staff receives the bids for these respective projects and prepares to initiate construction, the construction contracts will be presented to the City Council for approval at the appropriate time.

DISCUSSION
The Public Works Department is preparing a number of Capital Improvement Projects for execution during the 2024 summer construction season. At this time, staff is prepared to proceed with the bid solicitations for the projects that are outlined below. Staff will present comprehensive details associated with the project budgets, costs, and timelines at the time that each construction contract is presented to the City Council for consideration of the respective construction contracts.

The proposed projects to be authorized for bidding by this proposed action include:

Annual Citywide Street Sweeping Services
The Annual Street Sweeping Services will complete comprehensive street sweeping Item 1.8
across all 88-miles of City maintained streets one time to remove trash and debris, such as cinders, a part of the City’s compliance with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES). City staff is responsible for ongoing, routine street sweeping, which focuses on key areas of the City. The contracting of the additional services will ensure that all streets within the City receive annual street sweeping. It is anticipated that the City Council will consider a contract for this work in April 2024 to allow the work to commence as soon as weather and road conditions allow.

Adopted Budget: $40,000
CEQA Consideration: This program is not considered a project pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and, therefore, no environmental review is required.

Annual Citywide Line Striping Project
The City’s Annual Citywide Line Striping Project focuses on the repainting of the line striping and markers across City streets. The focus of the project is to repaint all traffic lane lines, crosswalks, and roadway legends throughout the City. It is anticipated that the City Council will consider a contract for this work in April 2024 to allow the work to commence as soon as weather and road conditions allow.

Adopted Budget: $100,000
CEQA Consideration: This project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15301.c Existing Facilities as repair and maintenance of existing streets and highways.

Village Accessibility Improvements
The Project involves sidewalk improvements to comply with Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) within the Village area. The project will construct new sidewalk and repair existing sidewalks by adding truncated domes, and correcting ramps and elevations within the Village area. This project is funded, in part, through the Community Development Block Grant, which is administered through San Bernardino County. Staff will proceed with the bid process as required and coordinate the construction to minimize impacts within the Village during the busy summer season.

Adopted Budget: $275,000
CEQA Considerations: This project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15301.c Existing Facilities as repair and maintenance and minor alterations of existing streets and highways.

Staff will proceed with the bid solicitations for the identified projects and will return to the City Council for the consideration of the construction contracts at the appropriate time. The action being considered within this report only authorizes staff to conduct the bid solicitations, it does not propose any budget amendments nor guarantee any construction contracts to be awarded.

FISCAL IMPACT
The actions contemplated within this report have a minor fiscal impact limited to the costs associated with preparing and soliciting construction bids. The contemplated projects are funded within the adopted Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Budget for Fiscal Year 2023-24. A complete fiscal analysis of each project will be reviewed at the time that the construction contract is presented for consideration.

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS
The above referenced projects are all categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to the sections indicated for each project.

CONSIDERATION OF STRATEGIC PRIORITIES
This item aligns with the City Council’s Strategic Priority No. 1 as it “supports and invests in sustainable infrastructure projects and programs”.

RECOMMENDED ACTION
It is recommended that the City Council authorize staff to proceed with bid solicitations for the following Capital Improvement Projects: Annual Citywide Street Sweeping Services, Village Accessibility Improvements and the Annual Citywide Line Striping Project and find the applicable projects exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

ATTACHMENT

1. CEQA Notices of Exemption for required projects

NOTICE OF EXEMPTION
TO: Clerk of the Board of Supervisors FROM: Engineering Division County of San Bernardino City of Big Bear Lake
385 N. Arrowhead Avenue, 2nd Floor P. O. Box 10000
San Bernardino, CA 92415-0130 Big Bear Lake, CA 92315-8900 Project Title:

Annual Citywide Line Striping Project
Project Location - Specific:

Various locally owned and maintained public streets within the City of Big Bear Lake Description of Project:

This project involves the painting of various roadway lines and markings at various locations on locally owned and maintained streets within the City of Big Bear Lake.

Name of Public Agency Approving Project:

City of Big Bear Lake, City Council
Name of Person or Agency Carrying out Project:

City of Big Bear Lake, Engineering Division
Exempt Status: (check one) (State type and section number) XX Categorically Exempt. Section: 15301(c)
Reasons why project is exempt:

These repairs are categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under section 15301.c as maintenance of existing highways and streets.

Lead Agency or Contact Person: Area Code/Telephone/Extension Sean Sullivan, Assistant City Manager (909) 866-5831
Date: February 14, 2024
Signature:
______________________________
Sean Sullivan,
Assistant City Manager
Item 1.8
Attachment 1

Village Accessibility Improvements
Project Location - Specific:

Various locally owned and maintained public streets within the City of Big Bear Lake Description of Project:

This project involves sidewalk improvements to comply with Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) within the Village area. The project will construct new sidewalk and repair existing sidewalks by adding truncated domes, and correcting ramps and elevations.

Name of Public Agency Approving Project:

City of Big Bear Lake, City Council
Name of Person or Agency Carrying out Project:

City of Big Bear Lake, Engineering Division
Exempt Status: (check one) (State type and section number) XX Categorically Exempt. Section: 15301(c)
Reasons why project is exempt:

These repairs are categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under section 15301.c as minor alterations of existing highways and streets, sidewalks, gutters, bicycle and pedestrian trails, and similar facilities.

CITY OF BIG BEAR LAKE
February 14, 2024
City Council Meeting
Public Hearing Reports

MEETING
DATE: February 14, 2024
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
THROUGH: Erik Sund, City Manager
FROM: Sean Sullivan, Assistant City Manager
Katya Meyer, Project Manager
SUBJECT: Resolutions Related to the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) 2024-2025 Program Year Applications and Funding Recommendations

BACKGROUND & DISCUSSION
The Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program is a federally-funded program which makes grant funds available for eligible applicants primarily serving low and moderate income households and/or persons. The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) establishes the CDBG regulations and administers the program through state and local governments. Due to its population below the 50,000 threshold, Big Bear Lake does not qualify as a direct entitlement city. The San Bernardino County Economic Development Agency (EDA) manages the CDBG program in the unincorporated portions of the County and to participating County cities, including the City of Big Bear Lake. The County allocates the City a CDBG amount each program year. Factors that contribute to the allocation include Census population estimates, poverty level, and housing statistics. The County solicits applications for CDBG funding proposals and reviews them for eligibility. In order to be considered an eligible application, at least one of the following objectives must be met:
• To principally benefit low and moderate income persons • To eliminate slums and blight; or
• To meet a recent and urgent need.

At least 51% of CDBG funds must benefit low-moderate income persons. Therefore, most activities identified for Big Bear Lake are those that accomplish meeting the low-and moderateincome objective. Proposals may include public service activities such as social, educational or health services; or the grant activity may include a capital improvement project, which removes architectural barriers to provide disabled access. The removal of architectural barriers to create accessibility in public facilities is presumed to benefit low and moderate income persons.

This public hearing is conducted annually so that the City may submit a timely project funding recommendation to the County Board of Supervisors. On January 9, 2024, the City received the County’s list of eligible projects. The City’s estimated CDBG allocation for this year is $35,853 and a chart overviewing the previous allocations is below.

Item 2.1
Grant Process and Funding Thresholds
The City’s allocation for the 2024-25 funding cycle is estimated at $35,853. The allocation is an estimate until Congress approves the final budget for HUD. The County will adjust the allocation based on the final federal decision in late spring. Historically, the City’s allocation has been at or below the estimated amount. CDBG projects are also subject to funding thresholds. Cities with allocations of less than $150,000, such as Big Bear Lake, are limited to funding up to four total project applications. Furthermore, since 2011, the County does not fund public services from their CDBG allocation. Prior to 2011, the City and County coordinated to allocate funding to all eligible local public service project requests.

Since the County will not fund public services, should the City recommend funding any local public service projects, the City will become responsible for administration and compliance with HUD’s regulations. Procedures and responsibilities include reviewing claims, creating monthly budget reports, conducting audits and inspections of the funded projects, and any other procedures involved with the management of individual grant awards. These responsibilities are commonly handled by a CDBG Analyst, which the City does not have on staff. As a result, the City would have to contract with an experienced CDBG consultant, which would directly impact the City’s fiscal budget.

Alternatively, the City may use its allocation toward a City project normally funded by general funds. If CDBG funds can be substituted for General Fund monies, an amount of $40,000 would become available for the City Council to redirect to CDBG applicants. This alternative enables the Council to make funding decisions that are not subject to thresholds and regulations. In this way, the City works directly with County staff to comply with HUD regulations for the City’s project, and no budget impact is anticipated. Attachment 1 contains a resolution recommending the County use the City’s allocation to fund a City capital project. Attachment 2 contains a resolution funding eligible local public service programs through the General Fund.

Funding Requests
Funding requests this year total $95,000 which exceeds the City’s CDBG allocation of $35,853.

Eight (8) eligible applicants submitted formal applications, including the City’s proposal. One public service organization (Pause 4 Paws Big Bear) submitted an application directly to staff after the deadline, so it was not reviewed for eligibility by County staff. However, the application was completed according to the requirements, and meets the County’s approval standards for eligibility. All local public service programs that submitted funding requests have received CDBG $31,456 $32,195 $33,988
$39,194 $36,508 $35,853
$-
$10,000
$20,000
$30,000
$40,000
$50,000
2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25
Previous Years Funding History
funding in previous years. This is the first year that Pause 4 Paws Big Bear has applied for funding.

Pause 4 Paws Big Bear is requesting $10,000 to continue an existing public service program that offers low cost veterinary care services to low income residents of the Big Bear Valley. This public service program is being recommended for funding because it primarily benefits low- to moderateincome persons. It has been the City’s past practice to award those public service organizations which have a local address and serve Big Bear Valley residents. The City Council has discretion to fund any applicant, in any amount. The applicants, project budgets, and requested funding is summarized in Table 1 below.

Table 1: 2024-2025 Eligible Programs
Applicant Project 2023-24
Award
2024-25
Budget
2024-25
Request
Public Services
Bear Valley
Community
Healthcare District
Continue the Parenting Education
Program to offer classes and services in
Spanish
$5,000 $157,370 $5,000
Big Bear Valley
Unified School
District (BVUSD)
Continue Student Outreach and Support
Services for students qualifying for
homeless services
$5,000 $41,175 $5,000
DOVES of Big Bear
Valley, Inc.

Continue the Transitional Living
Program; counseling and assistance to
abused survivors and their children
$5,000 $103,480 $5,000
Soroptimists of Big
Bear Valley
Expand number of students served by
Tuition Assistance for childcare to lowmoderate income households $5,000 $45,000 $5,000
United States
Adaptive Recreation
Center, Inc. (USARC)
Program and Outreach Coordinator for
Therapeutic Recreation to persons with
disabilities
$5,500 $59,200 $10,000
San Bernardino
County Library Big
Bear Branch
Continue Adult Literacy services with
tutoring for reading, spelling, basic
computer skills to illiterate adults
$5,500 $10,000 $10,000
Big Bear Valley
Recreation & Parks
District (BBVRPD)
Senior Nutrition Program (hot meals for
senior residents)
$5,500 $60,000 $5,000
Pause 4 Paws Big
Bear*
Public service, offering low cost
veterinary medical services such as
spay/neuter, vaccines, etc.

N/A $32,870 $10,000
TOTAL PUBLIC SERVICES FUNDS REQUESTED $55,000
Capital Improvement Projects
City of Big Bear Lake Village Accessibility ImprovementsPhase IIN/A $60,000 $40,000 TOTAL CDBG FUNDS REQUESTED $95,000
*application was not reviewed by San Bernardino County staff for eligibility A list of eligible applications received prior to the deadline (as provided by the County) is shown in Attachment 3, and the corresponding applications are provided in Attachment 4. The application and request for funding received by Pause 4 Paws Big Bear is provided in Attachment 5.

Public Service Program Requests
The public service applicants propose continued and new services, which primarily benefit lowand moderate-income persons residing in Big Bear Lake. This satisfies one national objective of the CDBG program. The applicants are only seeking funding from the City’s allocation and not from other participating CDBG agencies. Public service funding requests range from $5,000 to $10,000.

Capital Improvement Program Request
The City submitted the application for a Capital Improvement Project, to continue ADA accessible sidewalk improvements as part of the Village Accessibility Improvements, which is identified on the City’s 5-Year Capital Improvements Program to be completed in fiscal year 2024-2025. CDBG funds will be used for construction of ADA accessible sidewalks. The project is eligible because it removes ADA-barriers caused by missing or inaccessible walkways and sidewalk and replaces them with ADA compliant concrete.

Public Noticing
The County initiated public noticing of this year’s CDBG program. The CDBG Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA) was released to the public on November 6, 2023, and was published in the Big Bear Grizzly on November 9, 2023. The City notified local service organization, organizations that have expressed interest in the program, and past CDBG applicants of the filing deadline by email on November 8, 2023. Subsequent email reminders were sent on December 5, 2023 and December 11, 2023. The CDBG application filing deadline was December 11, 2023. A public hearing notice of today’s hearing was placed on the City’s website and emailed to each of the applicants. In addition, a legal notice was published in The Grizzly newspaper on February 1, 2024. No public correspondence was received at the time of writing this report.

FISCAL IMPACT
The first proposed resolution authorizes a CDBG allocation of approximately $35,853 for the Village Accessibility Improvements Phase II Project. These funds would supplement anticipated future CDBG funds. Measure Y (transient occupancy tax) proceeds in future years will provide a total project budget of approximately $60,000 in FY 2024-25. City Council will also consider a second formal resolution that would appropriate General Fund grants in the FY 2024-2025 Budget to the identified public service programs in a total amount not to exceed $40,000.

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS
Making recommendations on CDBG allocations is not a project subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), pursuant to Section 15061(b) (3), Common Sense Exemption, of the CEQA Guidelines.

RECOMMENDED ACTION
It is recommended that the City Council:

1. Conduct a public hearing; and

2. Adopt a Resolution to Make a Project Funding Recommendation to the County of San Bernardino Using the City’s 2024-25 Community Development Block Grant Allocation of $35,853; and

3. Adopt a Resolution Recommending Appropriation of General Fund Grantsfor Local Public Service Programs Requesting 2024-2025 CDBG Funds

ATTACHMENTS

1. Resolution 2024-XX (County Recommendation)

2. Resolution 2024-XX (Public Service Programs)

3. Eligible Applications list prepared by the County

4. 2024-2025 CDBG Applications

5. Application Received after the County Deadline
RESOLUTION NO. 2024-XX

RESOLUTION TO MAKE A PROJECT FUNDING

RECOMMENDATION TO THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
USING THE CITY’S 2024-2025 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
BLOCK GRANT ALLOCATION OF $35,853
WHEREAS, the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) is a federally funded program which makes funds available for eligible applicants serving low- and moderate-income households and/or persons; and
WHEREAS, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) establishes the CDBG regulations and administers the program through state and local governments; and WHEREAS, the San Bernardino County (County) Economic Development Agency (EDA) manages the CDBG program for HUD in the unincorporated portions of the County and in participating county cities, including the City of Big Bear Lake (City); and WHEREAS, the EDA requires that the City make a funding recommendation using the City’s annual allocation, to be forwarded to the County Board of Supervisors for approval; and WHEREAS, on December 11, 2023, the City applied for a capital improvement project to the County, for the Village Accessibility Improvements Phase II Project, which is identified in the City’s 5-Year Capital Replacement / Improvement Plan; and WHEREAS, eight (8) eligible applicants submitted a formal application, including the City’s proposal. Of these, seven (7) are for local public service programs, which have received CDBG funding in previous years; and
WHEREAS, one organization (Pause 4 Paws Big Bear) submitted a request and application after the County deadline of December 11, 2023 and requests funds for a public service program which has not received past CDBG funding; and
WHEREAS, funding requests of eligible applications, and applications received after the deadline total $95,000, which exceeds the City’s CDBG allocation of $35,853; and WHEREAS, since the 2011-2012 CDBG cycle, the County no longer funds public services organizations with their allocation. Furthermore, participating cities that receive less than $150,000, such as Big Bear Lake, are now limited to funding only up to four total projects which submit formal applications to the County; and
WHEREAS, since 2011, the City has recommended funding capital improvement projects to comply with ADA regulations by removing architectural barriers in public facilities, and the City’s Village Accessibility project is eligible to be supplemented with CDBG funds; and Item 2.1
Attachment 1
WHEREAS, public notice of the February 14, 2024 City Council public hearing was published in The Grizzly on February 1, 2024.. The City Council agenda was distributed at least 72 hours in advance of the meeting and through the City’s webpage, the meeting packet was available to the general public; and
WHEREAS, on February 14, 2024, the City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing at the Big Bear Lake Civic and Performing Arts Center at 39707 Big Bear Boulevard, Big Bear Lake, CA 92315, and concluded the public hearing on this date; and WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of this resolution have occurred.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY the City Council of the City of Big Bear Lake hereby makes a project funding recommendation to the County of San Bernardino using the City’s 2024-2025 Community Development Block Grant allocation of $35,853 for the Village Accessibility Improvements Phase II Project, located at various public rights-of-way on Cameron Drive and Pine Knot Ave. in Big Bear Lake, CA 92315.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of February, 2024. ________
Perri Melnick, Mayor
ATTEST:
_
Erica Stephenson, City Clerk

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) ss

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

Erica Stephenson, City Clerk
RESOLUTION NO. 2024-XX

RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROPRIATION OF GENERAL

FUND GRANTS FOR LOCAL PUBLIC SERVICE PROGRAMS
REQUESTING 2024-2025 CDBG FUNDS
WHEREAS, the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) is a federally funded program which makes funds available for eligible applicants serving low- and moderate-income households and/or persons; and
WHEREAS, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) establishes the CDBG regulations and administers the program through state and local governments; and WHEREAS, the San Bernardino County (County) Economic Development Agency (EDA) manages the CDBG program for HUD in the unincorporated portions of the County and in participating county cities, including the City of Big Bear Lake (City); and WHEREAS, the EDA requires that the City make a funding recommendation using the City’s annual allocation, to be forwarded to the County Board of Supervisors for approval; and WHEREAS, eight (8) eligible applicants submitted a formal application, including the City’s proposal. Of these, seven (7) are for local public service programs, which have received CDBG funding in previous years; and
WHEREAS, one organization (Pause 4 Paws Big Bear) submitted a request and application after the County deadline of December 11, 2023 and requests funds for a new public service program which has not received past CDBG funding; and
WHEREAS, funding requests of eligible applications, and applications received after the deadline total $95,000, which exceeds the City’s CDBG allocation of $35,853; and WHEREAS, participating cities that receive less than $150,000 in CDBG funds are limited to recommending funding for only up to four total projects, and public service projects are subject to a 15% cap; and
WHEREAS, since the 2011-2012 CDBG cycle, the City has used its allocation to fund a City capital project normally funded by general funds, thereby allowing the City to redirect general funds to eligible CDBG applicants. This alternative enables the Council to make funding decisions that are not subject to CDBG thresholds and regulations; and WHEREAS, the recent past practice of the City has been to fund the public services organization requests from the General Fund in an amount that is consistent with the City’s CDBG allocation; and
Item 2.1
Attachment 2
WHEREAS, local public service project applicants rely on grants to provide crucial services and assistance to the City’s low and moderate income households and persons, including seniors, youth, and disabled persons; and
WHEREAS, a public notice of the February 14, 2024 City Council public hearing was published in The Grizzly on February 1, 2024. The City Council agenda was distributed at least 72 hours in advance of the meeting and through the City’s webpage, the meeting packet was available to the general public; and
WHEREAS, on February 14, 2024, the City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing at the Big Bear Lake Civic and Performing Arts Center at 39707 Big Bear Boulevard, Big Bear Lake, CA 92315, and concluded the public hearing on this date; and WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of this resolution have occurred.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY the City Council of the City of Big Bear Lake that the General Fund public service program grants will be appropriated in the FY 2024-2025 Budget and approved to be distributed to the eight (8) local public service applicants in the amount shown in the table below:

Applicant Project Funding
Request
City
Grant
Bear Valley Community
Healthcare District
Parenting education and resources, offering
classes and services in Spanish $5,000 $5,000
Big Bear Valley Unified
School District (BVUSD)
Student Outreach and Support Services for
students qualifying for homeless services $5,000 $5,000 DOVES of Big Bear Valley,
Inc.

Transitional Living Program; counseling and
assistance to abused survivors and their
children
$5,000 $5,000
Soroptomists of Big Bear
Valley
Beyond The Bell, before/after school
childcare to low/mod income households $5,000 $5,000
United States Adaptive
Recreation Center, Inc.
(USARC)
Program and Outreach Coordinator for
Therapeutic Recreation to persons with
disabilities
$10,000 $5,000
San Bernardino County
Library Big Bear Branch
Adult Literacy services with tutoring for
reading, spelling, basic computer skills to
illiterate adults
$10,000 $5,000
Big Bear Valley Recreation
& Parks District (BVRPD)
Senior Nutrition Program (hot meals for
senior residents) $5,000 $5,000
Pause 4 Paws Big Bear
Low cost veterinary medical services such as
spay/neuter, vaccines, etc. to low/moderate
income households
$10,000 $5,000
TOTAL $55,000 $40,000
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of February, 2024. ________
Perri Melnick, Mayor
ATTEST:
_
Erica Stephenson, City Clerk

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) ss

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

Erica Stephenson, City Clerk
New/Cont. District Location Applicant Application # Project Title Project Description Amount Requested
Comments
New Third District Big Bear Lake
Bill Hoffman, Regional Manager
Big Bear Recreation and Park District
PO Box 2832
Big Bear Lake, CA 92315
[email protected] (909)866-
9700
BBLK24PS-038 Big Bear Lake: Senior Nutrition
- BBVRPD
Public Service - This Senior Nutrition program will provide congregate meals for approximately 247 low/moderate income seniors with 3-5 nutritious meals a week. It will enhances quality of life, through interaction with peers, program staff, and nutrition education, which can help in home meal preparation. $5,000.00
Eligible Public Service - BBVRPD will provide approximately 247 low and moderate income senior citizens residing in the Big Bear Valley with nutritious congregate meals. Public Services are limited to low-and moderate-income persons and require monthly documentation that at least 51% of the persons served qualify as low-and moderate-income. Senior Citizens are a presumed 51% low- and moderate-income population. However, documentation is still required.

Cont Third District Big Bear Lake
Erik Sund, City Manager
City of Big Bear Lake
39707 Big Bear Boulevard
Big Bear Lake, CA 92315
[email protected]
909-866-5831
BBLK24CN-011
Big Bear Lake: Village
Accessibility Improvements -
Phase II
Construction - The project will remove the existing non-ADA accessible walkway and replace and expand approximately 2,000 feet of paths with ADAcompliant concrete walkways and ramps to enhance accessibility within the Village.
$40,000.00
Eligible Construction Project - The project will remove the existing non-ADA accessible walkway and replace and expand approximately 2,000 feet of paths with ADA-compliant concrete walkways and ramps to enhance accessibility within the Village. It is in Census Tract 112.05, Block Group 1. This project benefits disabled individuals countywide, so 284,378 persons will benefit from this project. Eligibility is subject to City of Big Bear Lake funding participation and use of federal prevailing wage rates. Only those costs involved in ADA barrier removal are eligible.

New Third District Big Bear Lake
Quinton Page, Program Director
DOVES of Big Bear Valley, Inc.
41943 Big Bear Blvd.

Big Bear Lake, CA 92315
[email protected]
909-866-1546
BBLK24PS-008 Big Bear Lake: DOVES
Transitional Living Program
Public Service - DOVES, under contract with the City of Big Bear Lake, will provide counseling, group classes and subsidies for clients who are actively transitioning to the community after leaving an abusive relationship. $5,000.00
Eligible Public Services - DOVES, under contract with the City of Big Bear Lake, will provide counseling, group classes and subsidies to 10 unduplicated clients who are actively transitioning to the community after leaving an abusive relationship. Public Services are limited to low-and moderate-income persons and require monthly documentation that at least 51% of the persons served qualify as low-and moderate-income.

Battered and abused spouses are a presumed 51% low-to moderate-income population. However, documentation is still required.

Cont Third District Big Bear Lake
Sara Rosell-Gavigan, Executive Director
United States Adaptive Recreation Center
(USARC)
P.O. Box 2897
Big Bear Lake, CA 92315
[email protected]
909-939-7197
BBLK24PS-036
Big Bear Lake: Outdoor
Therapeutic Recreation for
Persons with Disabilities -
United States Adaptive
Recreation Center (USARC)
Public Service - USARC, under contract with the City of Big Bear Lake, will provide 100 persons with disabilities with outdoor therapeutic recreation lessons.
$10,000.00
Eligible Public Service - USARC will provide 100 persons with disabilities residing in San Bernardino County with 200 outdoor therapeutic recreation lessons between July 1, 2024 and June 30, 2025. Public Services are limited to low-and moderate-income persons and require monthly documentation that at least 51% of the persons served qualify as low-and moderate-income. Disabled persons are a presumed 51% low- and moderate-income population. However, documentation is still required.

New Third District Big Bear Lake
Linda Rosado, Executive Director of Business
Services and Classified Human Resources
Bear Valley Unified School District
P.O. Box 1529
Big Bear Lake, CA 92315
[email protected]
909-866-4631
BBLK24PS-058
Big Bear Lake: Student
Support Program - Bear Valley
Unified School District
Public Service - Bear Valley Unified School District, under contract with the City of Big Bear Lake, will identify 250 homeless and low- and moderate-income youth and link them with community resources, if necessary. $5,000.00
Eligible Public Service - Bear Valley Unified School District's Student Support Program, under contract with the City of Big Bear Lake, will identify approximately 250 homeless, and low- and moderate-income youth and link them to essential community resources, such as health care. Clothing, school supplies, food baskets and essentials are to be provided on an as needed basis. CDBG funds cannot be used to purchase gift cards.

Public Services are limited to low- and moderate-income persons and require monthly documentation that at least 51% of the households served qualify as low- and moderate-income.

New Third District Big Bear Lake
Christina Marmolejo, President
Soroptimist International of Big Bear Valley
(SIBBV)
P.O. Box 6505
Big Bear Lake, CA 92315
[email protected]
(909)866-9700
BBLK24PS-035
Big Bear Lake: Childcare
Tuition Assistance -
Soroptimist International of
Big Bear Valley (SIBBV)
Public Serivce- Soroptimist International of Big Bear Valley (SIBBV), under contract with the City of Big Bear Lake, will provide child care tuition assistance for Beyond the Bell (BTB) before- and after-school care.. $5,000.00
Eligible Public Service - Soroptimist International of Big Bear Valley (SIBBV), under contract with the City of Big Bear Lake, will provide child care tuition assistance for 78 children from low- and moderate-income households at Beyond the Bell (BTB) before- and after-school care. Public Services are limited to low- and moderate-income persons and require monthly documentation that at least 51% of the households served qualify as low- and moderate-income.

New Third District Big Bear Lake
Megan Meadors, Program Director
Bear Valley Community Healthcare District
Foundation
PO Box 1649
Big Bear Lake, CA 92315
[email protected]
909-878-2326
BBLK24PS-019
Big Bear Lake: Parenting
Education and Resources - The
Mom & Dad Project - Bear
Valley Community Healthcare
District (BVCHD)
Public Service - The BVCHD's Mom & Dad Project, under contract with the City of Big Bear Lake, will fund a Latino Outreach Coordinator to provide outreach to Spanish speaking persons raising children from prenatal to age 18, make parenting education and resources referrals and allow all services and classes to be offered in Spanish.
$5,000.00
Eligible Public Service - The BVCHD's MOM & DAD Project, under contract with the City of Big Bear Lake, will fund a Latino Outreach Coordinator to provide outreach to Spanish speaking persons raising children from prenatal to age 18, make parenting education and resources referrals and allow all services and classes to be offered in Spanish. Public Services are limited to low- and moderate-income persons and require monthly documentation that at least 51% of the households served qualify as low- and moderate-income. Project site: 41820 Garstin Drive, Big Bear Lake, CA 92315.

Cont Third District Big Bear Lake
Melanie Orosco, County Librarian
268 W. Hospitality Lane, 3rd Floor 301
San Bernardino, CA 92415
[email protected]
909-387-2220
BBLK24PS-022 Big Bear Lake: Adult Literacy
Program
Pubic Service - The Big Bear Lake Literacy Program will provide approximately 10 low-to moderate-income residents of Big Bear Lake and surrounding areas with access to individualized tutoring and one-on-one literacy instructions.

Literacy services are provided free of charge to all participants enrolled in the program. CDBG funds will be used to support personnel expenses. $10,000.00
Expanding Eligible Public Service. Services are limited to low- and moderate-income clients and requires documentation of at least 51% of the clients are low- to moderate-income. Client eligibility (for all clients including illiterate adults) must be evidenced by documentation and data concerning beneficiary family size and income. This activity was funded in previous fiscal years and is a continuing activity. Therefore a quantifiable increase in the level of service is required. CDBG funds will be used to pay for personnel services. Services are provided by San Bernardino County Library Department staff and volunteers. Project Address: 41930 Garstin Drive, Big Bear Lake, CA 92315.

Item 2.1
Attachment 3
Construction Program Application Fiscal Year –
San Bernardino County
Fiscal Year -
Construction Improvement Application
The following documents must be submitted in the order listed, please be sure to submit all attachments to your application.

Exhibit 1: Organization Information
Exhibit 2: Project Information
Exhibit 3: Project Characteristics
Exhibit 4: Priority Needs:

Exhibit 5: Project Budget & Sources
Exhibit 6: Proposed Goals and Milestones
Exhibit 7: Agency Capacity Narrative
Exhibit 8: Civil Rights Laws Compliance And HUD Good Standing Exhibit 9: Signatures And Assurances
Maintenance And Operations Agreement
Application Checklist
________________
Log Number
(Office Use Only)
1 ✔
✔
2025 2024 2025 ✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
2024 BBLK24CN-011 ✔
Item 2.1
Attachment 4
Construction Program Application Fiscal Year –
Exhibit 1: Organization Information
Organization Name:

Organization Address:

City/State/Zip:

Phone:

Fax:

Email:

Applicant Type:

Authorized Person Name:

Authorized Person’s Title:

Address:

City/State/Zip:

Phone:

Fax:

Email:

Application Contact Person’s Name:

Application Contact Person’s Title:

The City's mission is to "To sustain a high quality of life for our community members, while promoting a vibrant local economy that welcomes respectful visitors, in order to foster a kind and caring community of people who value and enjoy our beautiful natural environment." The City of Big Bear Lake incorporated in 1980 and has a permanent population of 5,189 (2021 CA Dept. of Finance). Big Bear Lake is a popular resort destination, so weekend population can swell to 20,000+ and peak holidays support 100,000 visitors and residents. The Big Bear Lake Village is a popular and highly visited destination that boasts many shops, restaurants, and gathering places. There are a couple of key sidewalks and pedestrian routes that need improvement to ensure safe and accessible paths of travel for visitors to the Village. The proposed project will construct ADA ramps and accessible sidewalks in several areas of the Village. The FY 24/25 CDBG funding will supplement some existing City funds that are available for this project.

City Manager [email protected] Erik Sund Big Bear Lake / CA / 92315 City of Big Bear Lake P.O. Box 10000/ 39707 Big Bear Blvd City Project Manager 9098665831 9098665831 Big Bear Lake / CA / 92315 Construction Program Application Fiscal Year –
Exhibit 2: Project Information
Project Title:

Address:

City /State/Zip:

County Supervisorial District where project will be located:

Project Type (Description):

If requesting additional funds for an existing CDBG project, provide prior CDBG project number? Eligible Block Group
Indicate eligible Block Group to be benefited by CDBG Funds requested.

Provide a map identifying the eligible census block as indicated in the Eligible Census Blocks. 3 1
st District 2nd District 3rd District: 4
th District 5th District
Is this a new construction project, or a request for additional funding to an existing CDBG Project? 2025
The project will install new ADA accessible sidewalks and repair existing sidewalks to enhance accessibility within the Village.

New Construction Project Big Bear Lake Village Accessibility Improvements FY 24-25 2024 X various locations
Census Tract 112.05. The project removes barriers for use by disabled persons.

Big Bear Lake / CA / 92315
Construction Program Application Fiscal Year –
EXHIBIT 2A: Countywide Vision
Indicate Yes/No in the table below which countywide vision goals are pertinent to the proposed project.

Countywide Vision
Countywide Vision Yes/ No
Implement the Countywide Vision.

Create, Maintain and Grow Jobs and Economic
Value in the County.

Improve County Government Operations.

Operate in a Fiscally-Responsible and Business-Like
Manner.

Ensure Development of a Well-Planned, Balanced,
and Sustainable County.

Maintain Public Safety.

Provide for the Health and Social Services Needs of
County Residents.

Pursue County Goals and Objectives by Working
with Other Governmental Agencies.

Provide a brief narrative of how your project meets the Countywide Vision:
4 Yes
The sidewalk improvements will benefit both San Bernardino County residents and visitors because it provides access to areas of high visitation for the enjoyment of persons of all ages and abilities. It will create a safe way to access shopping, dining, community events, and recreation all within the Big Bear Lake Village. The project will also create balance by providing increased safe public connectivity to a variety of services and events that are housed in the Big Bear Lake Village. The project will expand the County goal of a sustainable environment by safely connecting the existing parking facilities on Cameron Drive to the sidewalk network found throughout the Village, thereby increasing safe access to multiple amenities including EV Charging Stations. The project will also provide jobs to the local workforce during construction, and will maintain a fiscally responsible budget as demonstrated by previously funded projects.

Yes 2024 Yes Yes Yes Yes 2025 Yes No
Construction Program Application Fiscal Year –
Exhibit 3: Project Characteristics
Street address and nearest cross streets of the site where the program will be carried out:

Legal property owner:

What is the current zoning?
Is this use permitted in this zoning?
Is a conditional use permit required? Yes/No
Complete applicable items for all construction projects:
• Assessor's parcel number:
• Square footage of proposed building or building addition:
• Square footage of construction site parcel:
• Length of improvements if street, water or sewer project:
• Service capacity of existing facility:
• Improved service capacity of the facility:
• Age of structure:
• Is the structure registered as a historic landmark under state, federal or local Law? Describe the geographic boundaries of the neighborhood, community, or region to be served by this project. This description must include service area boundaries if land acquisition or structural improvements are proposed (attach a map):
5 N/A 2025 City of Big Bear Lake N/A no building improvements N/A Public approx. 2,000 feet of sidewalks and accessible ramps N/A No N/A public ROW 2024 The project site is located in the heart of the heavily visited Big Bear Village within the City of Big Bear Lake. The site serves City residents, as well as residents and visitors from multiple counties.
public ROW adjacent to 0308-181-19 and 0308-193-44 N/A no structures Yes Construction Program Application Fiscal Year –
Exhibit 4: Priority Needs:

Complete the table below by answering “Yes” or “NO”.

Public Facility’s Needs: Yes/ No:

Senior Center Improvements
Community Center Improvements
Child Care Center Improvements
Youth Center Improvements
Park & Recreation Improvements
Social Care Facility Improvements
Code Enforcement Needs
Code Enforcement
Demolition and Clearance
Blight Abatement
Infrastructure Needs
Water and Sewer Improvements
Drainage Improvements
Street Improvements
Sidewalk Improvements
Commercial/ Industrial Infrastructure Development
Accessibility Needs
Removal of Architectural Barriers
Historic Preservation Needs:

Historic Preservation Improvements
Other:
6 No No 2025 No No No No No No No No No No No No Yes No No No Yes Yes 2024 Construction Program Application Fiscal Year –
Exhibit 4: Priority Needs (continued)
HUD Demographics: (Please indicate Yes/No)
• Does this project help prevent homelessness?
• Does this project help the homeless?
• Does this project help those with HIV or AIDS?
• Does this project primarily help persons with disabilities? Why this project is considered a priority?
Why this project is needed, Site the evidence to substantiate the need? Why must this proposed project be funded now versus receiving funding in future years?
What are the ramifications if this project is not recommended for funding in this fiscal year?
7 2024 Yes No
The project removes architectural barriers caused by missing or broken sidewalks and replaces them with ADA compliant concrete.

No 2025
Safety risks will be increased and City would need to find other funding sources to complete the project on time.

No
The existing sidewalk and lack of complete network poses a safety risk and causes architectural barriers to disabled persons.

Current sidewalks poses a potential for injury or accidents due to lack of inclusive access.

Potential closure of sidewalks if safety risks worsen.

Construction Program Application Fiscal Year –
What is the project’s population to be served?
What is the projects accomplishment level?
Summarize the Scope of Work; include in your summary the number of units or activities the project will complete with CDBG funds.

Describe how the project preserves a low and moderate-income neighborhood, or provides other community benefits.
8 The City's population is 5,189 and the Big Bear Valley's population is approximately 19,000.On peak weekends and holidays, the Big Bear Valley serves over 100,000 visitors from Southern California and beyond. The Big Bear Village is a key and popular destination for those visitors.

Add or replace approximately 2,000 feet of sidewalks with ADA-compliant concrete walkways and ramps.
2024
The project will expand ADA connectivity in a heavily utilized area of the City upon completion.
2025
The project benefits the overall community by ensuring consistent accessibility in a highly utilized area of a key public destination within the City.

Construction Program Application Fiscal Year –
Exhibit 5: Project Budget & Sources
Provide the estimated financial data for the project as requested below for the appropriate project group. Costs should be based on the best information available. When preparing this data, consider the following factors: (a) project should be completed in one phase if possible, or if phased, operational capability of the phases should be independent of each other: (b) a phased project should be prioritized and broken into distinct parts, with estimated cost and priority for each part; (c) apply federal prevailing wage rates to construction projects over $2,000.

Project Budget
SB County Share ($): Other Source ($):

Architectural and
engineering services
Site acquisition
Local Review application
Construction
Other:

Total
Overall Total Project Cost: (CDBG Share + Other Source) 9 $40,000.00 2025 $0.00 City Funding $40,000.00 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 $0.00 2024 $0.00 $60,000.00 Construction Program Application Fiscal Year –
Exhibit 5A: CDBG Funds Requested and Leveraging Information Indicate the amount being requested by the city.

City Amount Requested ($)
(This amount should match the grand
total requested from CDBG Share)
10 Leveraging items may include any written commitments that will be used towards your cash match requirements in the project, as well as any written commitments for building, equipment, materials, services and volunteer time.

Source of
Funding:

Type of Funding: (Grant Name,
EFSP Money)
Amount ($): Date
Available:
(11/22/2016)
Federal
Funding
State
Funding
County
Funding
Private
Funding
Other:

Total Leveraging Funds
Big Bear 2024 2025
$0.00 $40,000.00
Construction Program Application Fiscal Year –
Exhibit 6: Proposed Goals and Milestones
Explain how the project will meet contract goals and milestones. For example, project expenditures and performance/accomplishment goals of 40% by September 30th, 50% by December 31st, 80% by March 31st, and 100% by June 30th.

Fill-in the table below with dates for submission of reimbursement claims and the estimated amount of each.

Date of
Reimbursement:

Amount ($):

Total Reimbursement:
11 2024 $40,000.00 $40,000.00 2025
Project design by June 30, 2024; construction completed prior to June 30, 2025. 10/01/2025
Construction Program Application Fiscal Year –
EXHIBIT 7: Agency Capacity Narrative
(Non-Profit Organizations Only)
• Describe the roles of key administrators, staff members, and volunteers within your agency that will implement the proposed project. In your description include experience, education, and licensing qualifications.
• Describe your agency’s experience in administering government and/or public funds. • Describe your method to sustain project viability over the multi-year process if funding decreases.

INSTRUCTIONS: Complete the table below by marking “YES” or “NO to the questions listed below.

Question: Yes/ No
Example: Have you received federal funds in the past five years? Yes In the past ten years, has your organization ever had its nonprofit status revoked or withheld by the IRS, the Secretary of State, the State Attorney General, or the Franchise Tax Board?
Has your organization been sued in the last five years? Are any of your managers or staff with fiscal responsibilities involved in litigation presently that has any bearing on fiduciary trust or employee relations?
Have any unfavorable rulings been handed down by any court against your organization or Executive Director the last five years? Does your organization currently have any unresolved fiscal, reporting, or program issues with any of its funding sources?
12 The project will be funded through General Funds and other funds since it is a 5-year priority.

Project management will be overseen by the Director of Public Works, design services will be done by the Associate Engineer. Staff has over 15 years experience and includes state licensed engineers.

The City manages multiple grant-funded projects every year, including state and federal grants, such as Federal Lands Access Program (FLAP), Active Transportation Program(ATP), Transportation Development Act (TDA), Per Capita Parks Program, etc.

No
2024
No No No
2025
No
Construction Program Application Fiscal Year –
Exhibit 8: Civil Rights Laws Compliance And HUD Good Standing Answer the following questions:

Has your organization been a past recipient of assistance under a HUD McKinney Act program or the HUD Single Family Property Disposition Homeless Program? If you have been a recipient under either of these programs, has your agency experienced any project or construction delay, HUD finding or outstanding audit that HUD deems serious regarding the administration of HUD McKinney Act programs or the HUD Single Family Property Disposition Homeless Program?
If you answered “Yes”, please explain the circumstances and outcome below.

Applicants must be in compliance with applicable civil rights laws and Executive Orders. Applications will be rejected if your agency has any of the following: (1) Any pending civil rights lawsuit instituted by the U.S. Department of Justice; (2) Any noncompliance with civil rights statutes, Executive Orders or regulations as a result of formal administrative proceedings, unless the applicant is operating under a HUD-approved compliance agreement designed to correct the area of noncompliance or is currently negotiating such an agreement; (3) Any unresolved Secretarial charge of discrimination issues under Section 810(g) of the Fair Housing Act, as implemented by 24 CFR 103:400; (4) Any adjudication of a civil rights violation in a civil action brought against the Organization by a private individual, unless the applicant is operating in compliance with a court order designed to correct the area of noncompliance or the applicant has discharged any responsibility arising from such litigation; (5) Any deferral of the processing of applications from the sponsor imposed by HUD under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Attorney General’s Guidelines (28 CFR 50.3) or the HUD Title VI regulations (24 CFR 1.8) and procedures, or under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and HUD Section 504 regulations (24 CFR 8.57). If one or more of these situations exists with your Organization, please attach a brief description.
13 2024 No No 2025
14 E-Signature Authorization
San Bernardino County
Community Development and Housing Departmemt
Community Development Block Grant
In order to comply with all applicable federal grant regulations, a hard-copy of this E-Signature Authorization containing an original wet signature must be filed with the San Bernardino County Community Development and Housing (CDH) in order for the applicant to electronically sign the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) application documents online. This authorization may only be completed by a registered owner, partner, executive officer, or authorized employee (with proof of authorization) of the applicant submitting this form and must contain an original signature to be submitted to the CDH.

Authorization Agreement
I am an owner, partner, executive officer, or duly authorized employee of the below-listed applicant and have authority to enter into agreements on behalf of the below-listed applicant. CDH may rely on the receipt of such agreements executed and delivered by facsimile or other electronic means as if the original had been received. The undersigned agrees that the electronic signatures appearing on documents submitted from the below-listed applicant are the same as handwritten signatures for the purposes of validity, enforceability and admissibility. By signing this Electronic Signature Authorization Agreement, I authorize the CDH to accept, via electronic submission, documents submitted from the below-listed applicant as required by the CDH's CDBG - Funding Application.

I understand that CDH may change the CDBG application system from time to time. I agree that the below-listed applicant will electronically sign all documents requiring a signature related to the CDBG funding application.

My signature on this form certifies that:

I agree that entering my name in the CDBG funding application system constitutes my electronic signature. I understand that any information and documents submitted using my name is electronically certifying my signature. I understand that I am legally bound, obligated, and responsible by use of my electronic signature as much as I would be by my handwritten signature. I agree that I will protect my signature from unauthorized use, and that I will contact CDH immediately, upon discovery that my electronic signature has been compromised. I certify that my electronic signature is for my own use, and that I will not delegate it or share it with any individual.

This request is effective immediately upon receipt by the CDH and will remain in effect until the end of the - CDBG funding cycle or I choose to cancel this request via written notification to the CDH. I understand that it is my responsibility to update and/or cancel this request under all circumstances, including my departure or terminated association with the below-listed applicant.

By signing the E- Signature Authorization Form we certify that this agency will also comply with the following:

Non-discrimination
This organization will, through all possible means, ensure equal opportunity for all persons to receive services, to participate in the volunteer structure, and to be employed regardless of age, handicap, national background, race, religion, or sex. An existing sectarian nature of the agency shall not suffer impairment under this agreement, but participation in religious observances, rituals or services will not be required as a condition of receiving food, services, or shelter paid for by this grant.

Accountability
We commit this organization, if a grant is received, to provide all reports to the County as required; to expend monies only on eligible costs; to keep complete documentation (copies of all canceled checks, invoices, receipts, etc.) on all expenditures for a minimum of three years; to spend all funds and close out the program on the required date; to return any unused funds to the County to cooperate with monitoring or site visits, and; to provide complete documentation of expenses to the County, if requested, by the required date.

We affirm that all information in this application is true and correct to the best of our knowledge and that the applicant under our authority will execute its responsibility under the proposed contract and adhere to all other applicable rules and regulations to the fullest extent possible.

Non-collusion
This proposal is genuine, and not sham or collusive, nor made in the interest or in behalf of any person not herein named; the proposer has not directly induced or solicited any other proposer to put in a sham proposal, or any other person, firm or corporation to refrain from submitting a proposal; the proposer has not in any manner sought by collusion to secure for him/herself an advantage over any other proposer.

Applicant Information
Agency Name: Federal Tax ID No.:

Mailing Address: Phone No.:

Email Address: Fax No:

Authorized Signature
Print Name: Print Title:

Signature: Date:
- Application
Please send the signed copy of this one page agreement to:

San Bernardino County Community Development and Housing Department 215 North D Street, Suite 302, San Bernardino, CA 94215-0043 Attn: CDBG Application
2024 2024 2024 (909) 866-6766 City of Big Bear Lake City of Big Bear Lake P.O. Box 10000 (909) 866-5831 2025 2025 2025 Erik Sund City Manager [email protected] Construction Program Application Fiscal Year -
Maintenance and Operations Agreement
Please keep in mind the Maintenance and Operations cost is ineligible for CDBG funds.

All capital improvements or facilities will require a Maintenance and Operation (M & O) contract. The MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION COMMITMENT must be signed by a representative of the M & O entity with authority to obligate the organization.
1) MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION COMMITMENT: The governing body of the below named public, quasi-public, or non-profit entity has the financial capacity and is willing to assume the Maintenance and Operation (M & O) responsibility and costs associated with the indicated community development project. This body has reviewed the "Estimated Annual Maintenance and Operation Budget" part of this section. To the best of this body's ability, it has determined this budget to be a true and accurate estimate of the annual M & O costs for the proposed project.

It is understood that without a commitment for maintenance and operation, the indicated project may not be considered for funding under the Community Development Block Grant program. Should this project be funded, a formal M & O contract shall be written and signed before any funds can be released.

NOTE: The Maintenance and Operation cost for capital improvements and facilities are not eligible for CDBG funding.

Proposed Project:

Legal/ Incorporated Name of Prospective M&O Entity:

Address:

Federal I.D. Number of M&O Entity:

Signature: ____________________________________ Title: _____________________ Print Name: ___________________________________ Date:
15 2024 City of Big Bear Lake 39707 Big Bear Blvd. 95-3603975Erik Sund City Manager Erik Sund Big Bear Lake Village Accessibility Improvements FY 24-25 2025 12/06/2023 Construction Program Application Fiscal Year -
Maintenance and Operations Expenses
Utilities Amount ($):

Electric
Water
Gas
Telephone
Disposal Service
Other:

Sub-Total
Materials
Janitorial Supplies
Office Supplies
Recreational Supplies
Ground Supplies
Other:

Sub-Total
Maintenance – Capital Improvements
Building Repair
Maintenance of Equipment
Improvements to Property
Other:

Sub-Total
Insurance
Liability
Fire
Other:

Sub-Total
16 $0.00 $0.00 2025 $0.00 $0.00 2024
Construction Program Application Fiscal Year -
Personnel
Maintenance
Secretary
Administrator
Program Staff
Other:

Sub-Total
M& O Annual Expense Total
List out all sources and liabilities such as budget sources, membership, user fees, etc.

Revenue Sources: Amount ($):

Budgeted Revenue Total
Assets/ Liabilities Amount ($):

Budgeted Revenue minus M&O Expense
17 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 2024 2025 $0.00
Construction Program Application Fiscal Year -
CDBG Application Checklist
(Non-Profit Agency Only)
Community-based organizations are required to include one copy of the items listed below. If you are not submitting these items at this time, please notify Community Development and Housing at (909) 501-0600 to make other arrangements. The following information is required before any contract or reimbursement can be completed.
o Summary of agency’s current year General Operating Budget o List of agency’s Board of Directors, including names and addresses o Proof of existing non-profit/tax-exempt status (Letters from the Federal Internal Revenue Service and State Franchise Tax Board)
o Current certificate of insurance and amounts covered
o Organizational chart
o Minutes of last Board meeting
o Non- Profit agency’s must be Registered in the System of Award Management (SAM) website. Agency cannot be funded if they have been debarred in the past. o Provide board minutes/letter that authorizes the executive director or program manager to run the project.

If your application is funded you will be required to provide a copy of your last audit and your Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws must be on file.
18 2024 2025
Public Services Program Application Fiscal Year –
San Bernardino County
Fiscal Year -
PublicServices ProgramApplication
The following documents must be submitted in the order listed, please be sure to submit all attachments with your application.

Exhibit 1: Organization Information
Exhibit 2: Project Information
Exhibit 3: Community Needs and Target Population
Exhibit 4: Project Budget & Sources
Exhibit 5: Performance & Outcomes
Exhibit 6: Agency Capacity Narrative
Exhibit 7: Civil Rights Laws Compliance and HUD Good Standing Exhibit 8: Signature and Assurances
Application Checklist
_______________
Log Number
(Office Use Only)
1 2024 2025 ✔
2025 2024 BBLK24PS-008
Public Services Program Application Fiscal Year –
Exhibit 1: Organization Information
Organization Name:

Organization Address:

City/State/Zip:

Phone:

Fax:

Email:

Applicant Type:

Authorized Person Name:

Authorized Person’s Title:

Address:

City/State/Zip:

Phone:

Fax:

Email:

Application Contact Person’s Name:

Application Contact Person’s Title:

Explain the Agency’s 1) Mission, 2) Purpose, 3) Population Served, 4) Number of years serving population, 5) Supportive Services, their Funding Sources, and Start/End Dates. 2 Sarah Garrison 2024 Grant and Marketing Manager 41943 Big Bear Blvd [email protected] CDBG Program 2025 41943 Big Bear Blvd Big Bear Lake / CA / 92315 [email protected] DOVES mission is to serve as the community’s resource for ending domestic violence by:
empowering and providing safety for those who are suffering physical, emotional, verbal, sexual, or financial abuse at the hands of an intimate partner; to assist other community members experiencing violence within the family; to model positive and healthy relationship choices for youth in an effort to end the generational cycle of domestic violence; and to effect a culture shift among community members regarding the use of power in relationships, through education and partnerships with the public, government and other community organizations and institutions. We have been providing programs and services to the Bear Valley community since 1982. Services provided include: intervention, prevention and education programs. Approximately 61% of the clients we serve are ages 19-54; 88% are females; 57% are Caucasian; 25% are Latino and 15% are Black/Africa Big Bear Lake / CA / 92315 DOVES of Big Bear Valley, Inc Quinton Page 909-866-1546 Program Director 909-866-1546 Public Services Program Application Fiscal Year –
Exhibit 2: Project Information
Project Title:

Project Address:

County Supervisorial District where project will be located:
1 st District 2nd District 3
rd District 4th District 5th District
If you are requesting funds for an existing CDBG project, provide prior CDBG project number.

Will this project provide an opportunity to hire minority-owned and women owned businesses? If YES, describe what actions will be completed to implement such subcontracting plans to monitor this component of the proposed project. If NO, discuss why and what actions are being taken to encourage minority-women businesses to apply for this project. 3 If this is an Expansion of Service to previously funded CDBG project, please explain how this is an expansion of service?. (i.e For 2015 we proposed 60 units of service, this year the agency is planning to serve 100 units of service)
Is this a New Public Service Project, or request to expand services to an existing CDBG project? Yes
This program helps prevent homelessness by assisting clients with rent, utilities, childcare and other subsidies. We will also will provide job training, including resume building and interview assistance. Approximately 61% of the clients we serve are ages 19-54; 88% are females; 57% are Caucasian; 25% are Latino and 15% are Black/African American. Because we are helping prevent homelessness, and also helping clients build independent skills, we are providing an opportunity to hire women an minorities
2024 41943 Big Bear Blvd. Big Bear Lake, CA 92315 X
New Public Service Project Transitional Living Program
We plan on expanding our Transitional Living Program by 20 clients. 2025
Public Services Program Application Fiscal Year –
EXHIBIT 2A: Countywide Vision
Indicate Yes/No in the table below if any of these countywide vision goals are pertinent to the proposed project.

Countywide Vision
Countywide Vision Yes/ No
Implement the Countywide Vision.

Create, Maintain and Grow Jobs and
Economic Value in the County.

Improve County Government Operations.

Operate in a Fiscally-Responsible and
Business-Like Manner.

Ensure Development of a Well-Planned,
Balanced, and Sustainable County.

Maintain Public Safety.

Provide for the Health and Social Services
Needs of County Residents.

Pursue County Goals and Objectives by
Working with Other Governmental
Agencies.

Provide a brief narrative of how your project meets the Countywide Vision:
4 2024 Yes Yes Yes Yes 2025 Yes Yes
Part of the mission of DOVES is to serve as the community's resource for ending domestic violence by empowering and providing safety for those who are suffering from abuse at the hands of an intimate partner. This project will enable DOVES clients to be empowered and successful in their transition into all areas of the community. This supports the part of the Countywide Vision which states "we envision a sustainable system of high-quality education, community health, public safety, housing...in which development complements our natural resources and environment.

Yes Yes
Public Services Program Application Fiscal Year –
Exhibit 3: Community Needs and Target Population
Community Needs Target Population
Public Service
Needs:

Yes/No Proposed Community: Yes/No
Senior Services Low and Moderate Persons
Handicapped
Services
Low and Moderate
Households
Youth Services Abused Children
Child Care
Services
Handicapped Persons
Transportation
Services
Illiterate Persons
Substance Abuse
Services
Homeless Persons
Employment
Training
Migrant Farm Workers
Health Services Elderly People
Lead Hazard
Screening
Crime
Awareness
5 City/Target Area of Project Beneficiaries
Participating Cities: (i.e Redlands, Colton, Yucaipa)
Yes No2024 NoYes No NoYes No No 2025 Yes NoYes
Big Bear Lake, CA
Yes Yes Yes NoYes No
Public Services Program Application Fiscal Year –
Exhibit 3: Community Needs and Target Population (continued) Describe the geographic boundaries of the neighborhood, community or area in which clients of the proposed program reside (attach a map if needed):

HUD Demographics: (Yes/No)
 Does this project help prevent homelessness?
 Does this project help the homeless?
 Does this project help those with HIV or AIDS?
 Does this project primarily help persons with disabilities? Summarize the description of your project to include 1) priority, 2) sub-activity, 3) population(s) to be served, and 4) accomplishment level, and 5) services to be provided. 6 2024
The monies received from this grant will be used for our transitional program. This program is for clients who are actively transitioning to the community after leaving an abusive relationship. For most of these clients, this is the first time they are independently establishing a household after leaving an abusive partner. A pragmatic need surfaces repeatedly when women leave DOVES’ direct care: having enough income to pay for housing, transportation, education/training, food, clothing, and childcare. Regrettably, for some, the option to return to their abusive partner seems to be the only way they can provide for themselves and their children. Assistance to be provided will be, but not limited to: Assistance includes subsidies for rent, utilities, transportation, food and clothing, vision and dental, tuition assistance, and childcare. Other assistance includes help with job applications, help getting a driver’s license, and purchasing curriculum/resources to be used for support groups. The Transitional Program Advocate at DOVES will maintain documentation regarding each participant’s needs and track the assistance and development provided, as well as monetary value of any expense-based services. DOVES’ Executive Director will provide oversight, including managing funds expenditure, as each participant’s needs will be different and dispersal of funds will be determined by needs within limits of the annual budget for expense-based services. 2025 No
The city of Big Bear Lake is a rural community located in Big Bear Valley in the eastern San Bernardino Mountains. It is bounded on the west by the dam, on the east by Big Bear City, and separated from the northern communities by the lake.

NoYes Yes
Public Services Program Application Fiscal Year –
Describe how this project meets the priority population and activities selected.

Explain why this project is needed and what evidence can you substantiate the need.

Describe what gaps of service in the county this project fills.

What are the critical factors for the success of your project (include both financial and human resources)? For instance, is this the only funding for this project? What happens if funding decreases? Does this project rely on only one source of leveraging? Is there adequate staff involved with the project if there is project turnover? Please address any factor that is critical to project success.
7 Our community only has one low-income housing unit with a year wait list, so finding affordable housing in the Big Bear Valley is nearly impossible. This project is unique because it is the first of its kind to combat homelessness and domestic violence in the San Bernardino Mountain communities.
2024
The priority population for this grant includes men, women and their children who have left an abusive relationship. We are working on preventing homelessness by providing subsidies for rent, utilities, childcare and transportation, as well as providing group classes and one-on-one sessions with an advocate to work on specific goals.
2025
Our main funding sources are federal grants, as well as other organizational-based grants.

We are able to sustain this project with these grants and the revenues generated by our thrift store. We have adequate staff at the outreach center to maintain the viability of the project. In the book by Dr. Ludy Green on economics and domestic violence, she reports that in working with women from violent homes “Many women go back to their abuser….Their responses were always: ‘I don’t have the money. I depend on my husband. He pays all the bills, so what can I do with all the children. 1 1. Green, Ludy (2014) Ending domestic violence captivity: A guide to economic freedom.

Public Services Program Application Fiscal Year –
Exhibit 4: Project Budget & Sources
Project Budget
SB County Share: ($) Other Source: ($)
Personnel
Equipment (Rental, Lease or Purchase)
Consultant Services
(Auditing, Accounting or Payroll)
Space Rent
Insurance
Consumable Supplies
Other
Total Costs
Total Project Budget Cost: (CDBG Share + Other Source)
8 2024 $5,000.00 $0.00 $65,000.00 $98,480.00 2025 $103,480.00 Direct Client Services $5,000.00 $33,480.00 Public Services Program Application Fiscal Year –
Exhibit 4A: CDBG Funds Requested and Leveraging Information Indicate the amount being requested by the city.

City Amount Requested ($):
(This amount should match the grand
total requested from CDBG Share)
9 Leveraging items may include any written commitments that will be used towards your cash match requirements in the project, as well as any written commitments for building, equipment, materials, services and volunteer time.

Source of
Funding:

Type of Funding: (Grant Name,
EFSP Money)
Amount ($): Date
Available:
(11/22/2016)
Federal
Funding
State
Funding
County
Funding
Private
Funding
Other:

Total Leveraging Funds
2024 $30,849.00 07/01/2023 $98,480.00 Fundraising/ Thrift Store 2025 Big Bear $5,000.00 California Office of Emergency Services $67,631.00 07/01/2023 Public Services Program Application Fiscal Year –
Exhibit 5: Performance and Outcomes
Definitions:

Unduplicated Clients: The number clients/persons projected to be served during the program year (e.g. 25 clients, 50 seniors):

Duplicated Clients: The estimated yearly units of service (duplicated, e.g. 25 clients x 10 visits=250 units of service):

Complete the chart below with the number of Duplicated and Unduplicated Clients to be served.
• In column 1 identify activities that will be completed (e.g. intervention, counseling, and case management).
• In column 2 indicate the number of Unduplicated Clients to be served. • In column 3 identify the number of Duplicated Clients to be served.

Activities to be Completed (1) Unduplicated
Clients to be
Served (2)
Duplicated Clients
projected to be
served (3)
Performance and Outcomes, answer the following narrative questions using minimum funds request.

Indicate a timeline of services provided to client(s) in order to meet project outcome(s).

Describe how your agency determines client(s) success.

Describe your methodology to evaluate project outcomes. 10 2024 1010 2020 Counseling for transitional clients
Clients will meet with a DOVES advocate on a bi-weekly schedule to discuss goals to establish independent living. Advocate will monitor.
10 Subsidies for rent/utilities, etc 20 2025 Group class for transitional clients DOVES measures client's success on safety and self-improvement. During 24 month period, months 1-12 up to 33% of clients income will be subsidized; months 12-18 up to 20% of income will be subsidized; months 18-24 up to 10% of income will be subsidized; months 24 + 0%.

Public Services Program Application Fiscal Year –
Exhibit 5A: Proposed Goals & Milestones
Explain how the project will meet contract goals and milestones and be completed within 12 months (July 1, – June 30, ). For example, project expenditures and performance/ accomplishment goals of 40% by November 30th, 50% by December 31st, 80% by March 31st, and 100% by June 30th.

Fill-in the table below with dates for submission of reimbursement claims and the estimated amount of each.

Date of Reimbursement: Amount ($):

Total Reimbursement:
($)
11 2024 2024 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 08/01/2024 11/01/2024 $1,000.00 2025 2025 07/01/2024 $1,000.00 During a 24 month period, months 1-12 up to 33% of clients income will be subsidized; months 12-18 up to 20% of income will be subsidized; months 18-24 up to 10% of income will be subsidized; months 24 + 0% of income will be subsidized. 10/01/2024 $1,000.00 09/01/2024 $5,000.00
Public Services Program Application Fiscal Year –
Exhibit 6: Agency Capacity Narrative
(Non-Profit Organizations Only)
Describe the roles of key administrators, staff members, and volunteers within your agency that will implement the proposed project. In your description include experience, education, and licensing qualifications.

Describe your agency’s experience in administering government and/or public funds.

Describe your method to sustain project viability over the multi-year process if funding decreases.

Instructions: Complete the table below by marking “YES” or “NO” to the questions listed below.

Question:

Example: Have you received federal funds in the past
five years? Yes
In the past ten years, has your organization ever had its nonprofit status revoked or withheld by the IRS, the
Secretary of State, the State Attorney General, or the
Franchise Tax Board?
Has your organization been sued in the last five years? Are any of your managers or staff with fiscal
responsibilities involved in litigation presently that has any bearing on fiduciary trust or employee relations?
Have any unfavorable rulings been handed down by any
court against your organization or Executive Director the last five years?
Does your organization currently have any unresolved
fiscal, reporting, or program issues with any of its funding sources?

YES/ NO
12 2024
DOVES has been administering grants for over 35 years, including, state, federal, and public funds.

No No
If funding decreases we will use our thrift store money to help sustain this progect.

No 2025 No No
Executive Director, LMFT
Program Manager, BA
Transitional Advocate, BA
Administrative Assistant, BS
Public Services Program Application Fiscal Year –
EXHIBIT 7: Civil Rights Laws Compliance and HUD Good Standing Answer the following questions.

Applicants must be in compliance with applicable civil rights laws and Executive Orders. Applications will be rejected if your agency has any of the following: (1) Any pending civil rights lawsuit instituted by the U.S. Department of Justice; (2) Any noncompliance with civil rights statutes, Executive Orders or regulations as a result of formal administrative proceedings, unless the applicant is operating under a HUD-approved compliance agreement designed to correct the area of noncompliance or is currently negotiating such an agreement; (3) Any unresolved Secretarial charge of discrimination issues under Section 810(g) of the Fair Housing Act, as implemented by 24 CFR 103:400; (4) Any adjudication of a civil rights violation in a civil action brought against the Organization by a private individual, unless the applicant is operating in compliance with a court order designed to correct the area of noncompliance or the applicant has discharged any responsibility arising from such litigation; (5) Any deferral of the processing of applications from the sponsor imposed by HUD under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Attorney General’s Guidelines (28 CFR 50.3) or the HUD Title VI regulations (24 CFR 1.8) and procedures, or under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and HUD Section 504 regulations (24 CFR 8.57). If one or more of these situations exists with your Organization, please attach a brief description.
13 2024 2025 No No
E-Signature Authorization
San Bernardino County
Community Development and Housing Departmemt
Community Development Block Grant
- Application
In order to comply with all applicable federal grant regulations, a hard-copy of this E-Signature Authorization containing an original wet signature must be filed with the San Bernardino County Community Development and Housing (CDH) in order for the applicant to electronically sign the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) application documents online. This authorization may only be completed by a registered owner, partner, executive officer, or authorized employee (with proof of authorization) of the applicant submitting this form and must contain an original signature to be submitted to the CDH.

My signature on this form certifies that:

By signing the E- Signature Authorization Form we certify that this agency will also comply with the following:

Applicant Information
Agency Name: Federal Tax ID No.:

Mailing Address: Phone No.:

Email Address: Fax No:

Authorized Signature
Print Name: Print Title:

Signature: Date:

Please send the signed copy of this one page agreement to:

San Bernardino County Community Development and Housing Department 215 North D Street, Suite 302, San Bernardino, CA 94215-0043 Attn: CDBG Application
14 2024 2024 2024 Grant and Marketing Manager Grant and Marketing Manager 2025 2025 2025 12/05/2023 (909) 866-1546 (909) 866-1546 Sarah Garrison Grant and Marketing Manager DOVES of Big Bear Valley, Inc 41943 Big Bear Blvd PO Box 3646 33-0109115 [email protected] Sarah Garrison Public Services Program Application Fiscal Year –
CDBG Application Checklist
(Non-Profit Organizations Only)
Community-based organizations are required to include one copy of the items listed below. If you are not submitting these items at this time, please notify Community Development and Housing at (909) 501-0600 to make other arrangements. The following information is required before any contract or reimbursement can be completed.
o Summary of agency’s current year General Operating Budget o List of agency’s Board of Directors, including names and addresses o Proof of existing non-profit/tax-exempt status (Letters from the Federal Internal Revenue Service and State Franchise Tax Board) o Current certificate of insurance and amounts covered
o Organizational chart
o Minutes of last Board meeting
o Non- Profit agencies must be Registered in the System of Award Management (SAM) website.

Agency cannot be funded if they have been debarred in the past. o Provide board minutes/letter that authorizes the executive director or program manager to run the project.

If your application is funded you will be required to provide a copy of your last audit and your Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws must be on file. 15 2024 2025
Public Services Program Application Fiscal Year –
San Bernardino County
Fiscal Year -
PublicServices ProgramApplication
The following documents must be submitted in the order listed, please be sure to submit all attachments with your application.

Exhibit 1: Organization Information
Exhibit 2: Project Information
Exhibit 3: Community Needs and Target Population
Exhibit 4: Project Budget & Sources
Exhibit 5: Performance & Outcomes
Exhibit 6: Agency Capacity Narrative
Exhibit 7: Civil Rights Laws Compliance and HUD Good Standing Exhibit 8: Signature and Assurances
Application Checklist
_______________
Log Number
(Office Use Only)
1 ✔
✔
2025 2024 ✔
✔
✔
BBLK24PS-019 ✔
✔
✔
2024 2025 ✔
Public Services Program Application Fiscal Year –
Exhibit 1: Organization Information
Organization Name:

Organization Address:

City/State/Zip:

Phone:

Fax:

Email:

Applicant Type:

Authorized Person Name:

Authorized Person’s Title:

Address:

City/State/Zip:

Phone:

Fax:

Email:

Application Contact Person’s Name:

Application Contact Person’s Title:

Explain the Agency’s 1) Mission, 2) Purpose, 3) Population Served, 4) Number of years serving population, 5) Supportive Services, their Funding Sources, and Start/End Dates. 2 [email protected] The Mom & Dad Project 41820 Garstin Drive 2025 Executive Director Our mission is to provide full spectrum education and resources for everyone involved in raising a child. Our purpose is to help families stay safe, and to become healthy, thriving members of our community. We currently serve the rural area of Big Bear, including but not limited to Big Bear Lake, Big Bear City, Sugarloaf, Lake Williams, Baldwin Lake, Fawnskin and Moonridge. We have been serving our community’s most vulnerable population since our inception in 2001. The Mom & Dad Project is a program run under the umbrella of the area’s only hospital. We receive 65% of our funding through grants, State and Foundation. 9098782326 Executive Director Megan Meadors 41820 Garstin Drive Big Bear Lake / CA / 92315 Public Service 2024 [email protected] 9098782326 Megan Meadors Big Bear Lake / CA / 92315 Public Services Program Application Fiscal Year –
Exhibit 2: Project Information
Project Title:

Project Address:

Yes 41820 Garstin Drive Big Bear Lake Ca 92315 The Mom & Dad Project The Mom & Dad Project will use CDBG funding to continue to fund hours for our Latino Outreach Coordinator. This service is an expansion of our existing services, by allowing all our services and classes to now be offered in Spanish. The funds will be used to fund direct service hours to our Spanish speaking population.
2024 X
Public Services Program Application Fiscal Year –
EXHIBIT 2A: Countywide Vision
Indicate Yes/No in the table below if any of these countywide vision goals are pertinent to the proposed project.

Countywide Vision
Countywide Vision Yes/ No
Implement the Countywide Vision.

Create, Maintain and Grow Jobs and
Economic Value in the County.

Improve County Government Operations.

Operate in a Fiscally-Responsible and
Business-Like Manner.

Ensure Development of a Well-Planned,
Balanced, and Sustainable County.

Maintain Public Safety.

Provide for the Health and Social Services
Needs of County Residents.

Pursue County Goals and Objectives by
Working with Other Governmental
Agencies.

Provide a brief narrative of how your project meets the Countywide Vision:
4 Yes 2025 Yes Yes Yes Yes
The Mom & Dad Project is meeting the County Wide vision by working with families in the mountains to provide a community where they are safe, healthy, educated, and that they have the resources to meet their needs and live the best life has to offer. We work with families from diverse backgrounds to help them attain economic stability, emotional, and physical stability. We believe in a community where residents are valued, and system where we work collaboratively to meet the needs of our residents. We do not do our work alone, we work collaboratively with systems and programs to ensure families have what they need to be successful in life.

Yes 2024 Yes Yes
Public Services Program Application Fiscal Year –
Exhibit 3: Community Needs and Target Population
Community Needs Target Population
Public Service
Needs:

Yes/No Proposed Community: Yes/No
Senior Services Low and Moderate Persons
Handicapped
Services
Low and Moderate
Households
Youth Services Abused Children
Child Care
Services
Handicapped Persons
Transportation
Services
Illiterate Persons
Substance Abuse
Services
Homeless Persons
Employment
Training
Migrant Farm Workers
Health Services Elderly People
Lead Hazard
Screening
Crime
Awareness
5 City/Target Area of Project Beneficiaries
Participating Cities: (i.e Redlands, Colton, Yucaipa)
We currently serve the rural area of Big Bear, including but not limited to Big Bear Lake, Big Bear City, Sugarloaf, Lake Williams, Baldwin Lake, Fawnskin and Moonridge.. 2025 No Yes NoYes NoYes No No No Yes Yes2024 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Public Services Program Application Fiscal Year –
Exhibit 3: Community Needs and Target Population (continued) Describe the geographic boundaries of the neighborhood, community or area in which clients of the proposed program reside (attach a map if needed):

Yes Yes 2024 No
The BVCHD Mom & Dad Project’s priority is to serve adults who are involved in the life of a child. We primarily see parents and caregivers of children 0-5 years old. But due to our diversification of funding we are able to service parents and caregivers of any age child. Our priority is to stop child abuse and neglect by aiming at preventative services to help reduce the rate or abuse and neglect and also reduce the rate of recidivism.We are a program run under the local hospital so we work eagerly to connect ideas of health to all aspects of living, physical and emotional. We have many activities and programs that go on through the year. In addition to parenting classes and workshops, we also operate a Resource Center, Diaper Closet, a Nurturing Father Program, Women Infants and Children (WIC), Comprehensive Prenatal Services Program (CPSP), and dental screenings and exams. We are listed in the Funders Alliance report of 2020-2021 as a promising initiative. We have never defaulted on a contract and have been successful at accomplishing all our outcomes and goals as outlined in various proposals.We are requesting money from CDBG to continue to fund one of our Community Educators to continue to provide our classes in Spanish. The funding will go directly toward direct services to clients.

Public Services Program Application Fiscal Year –
Describe how this project meets the priority population and activities selected.

Explain why this project is needed and what evidence can you substantiate the need.

Describe what gaps of service in the county this project fills.

What are the critical factors for the success of your project (include both financial and human resources)? For instance, is this the only funding for this project? What happens if funding decreases? Does this project rely on only one source of leveraging? Is there adequate staff involved with the project if there is project turnover? Please address any factor that is critical to project success.
7 The Mom & Dad Project receives funding from a diversified group of funders, contracts, individual donors, and fundraising activities. The funding from the CDBG currently extends our parenting education and resource efforts to parents and caregivers who are monolingual Spanish. CDBG funding is matched by additional funders to continue to make these crucial parenting education and resource's available to Parents and Caregivers. If these funds were not provided to The Mom & Dad Project, services for this specific demographic would no longer be available.
2024 2025
The Mom & Dad Project serves 83% low to moderate income clients. We are housed in the areas only Family Health Center. We partner with them to establish a medical and dental home, as well as provide mental health, counseling services, along with our parenting education and resources. We also provide case management which targets housing, education, basic needs, and any other relevant services necessary to provide stability.

Parents and Caregivers in our community need our services to reduce risk of abuse and neglect, reduce feelings of isolation and depression, reduce stressors in the home such as lack of heat, water, electricity, food, and other basic needs, that potentially lead to child abuse and neglect. We continue to be the only Parenting Education and Resource Center for parents (English and Spanish speaking) and caregivers in Big Bear.

We serve the gap in Big Bear by being the only parenting education and resource center. We provide access to care through our insurance specialist, and our warm hand off referral to the family health clinic. We also offer WIC services, dental program, a diaper closet, post partum support groups, Daddy Boot Camp, childbirth education, in English and Spanish. The Mom & Dad Project offers a concrete support system in times of need, linkage and referrals vital to insuring that families are safe, healthy and thriving members of our community.

Public Services Program Application Fiscal Year –
Exhibit 4: Project Budget & Sources
Project Budget
SB County Share: ($) Other Source: ($)
Personnel
Equipment (Rental, Lease or Purchase)
Consultant Services
(Auditing, Accounting or Payroll)
Space Rent
Insurance
Consumable Supplies
Other
Total Costs
Total Project Budget Cost: (CDBG Share + Other Source)
8 2025 $5,000.00 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 $900.00 2024 $0.00 $10,524,300.00 $10,573,700.00 $10,568,700.00 $3,500.00 $5,000.00 Public Services Program Application Fiscal Year –
Exhibit 4A: CDBG Funds Requested and Leveraging Information Indicate the amount being requested by the city.

Source of
Funding:

Type of Funding: (Grant Name,
EFSP Money)
Amount ($): Date
Available:
(11/22/2016)
Federal
Funding
State
Funding
County
Funding
Private
Funding
Other:

Total Leveraging Funds
$149,643.00 2025 07/01/2024 $5,000.00 $10,000.00 2024 Big Bear $41,120.00 $98,523.00 07/01/2024 07/01/2024 $0.00 Public Services Program Application Fiscal Year –
Exhibit 5: Performance and Outcomes
Definitions:

Unduplicated Clients: The number clients/persons projected to be served during the program year (e.g. 25 clients, 50 seniors):

Duplicated Clients: The estimated yearly units of service (duplicated, e.g. 25 clients x 10 visits=250 units of service):

Indicate a timeline of services provided to client(s) in order to meet project outcome(s).

Describe how your agency determines client(s) success.

Describe your methodology to evaluate project outcomes. 10 2025 Parenting Education
The services provided by The Mom & Dad Project will begin July 1st 2023, and will be completed by June 30th 2024. The curriculum is set to work in quarters and we very rarely have any carry over clients
We use a database called the Family Development Matrix to track and evaluate outcomes for case management and Parenting Education.
150 150 2400 2024 150 Resource/referrals 450 300
The Mom & Dad Project uses a pre, mid and post test to measure risk category and learning success. In 2022-2023, after completing a 16-week class, 92% of our clients moved out of the “at risk” category.

Case Management
Public Services Program Application Fiscal Year –
Exhibit 5A: Proposed Goals & Milestones
Explain how the project will meet contract goals and milestones and be completed within 12 months (July 1, – June 30, ). For example, project expenditures and performance/ accomplishment goals of 40% by November 30th, 50% by December 31st, 80% by March 31st, and 100% by June 30th.

Fill-in the table below with dates for submission of reimbursement claims and the estimated amount of each.

Date of Reimbursement: Amount ($):

Total Reimbursement:
($)
11 2025 2025
The Mom & Dad Project spends a percentage of their budget on a monthly bases, based on best practices, prior knowledge and a best evaluation. The budget is evaluated on a monthly basis to ensure that we are on target for spending and to see if we need to make adjustments. Cases arise when we need to spend less in one month due to weather or other factors, such as school breaks, holidays etc. We put measures in place to make sure the budget is spent in the most responsible way possible.
2024 2024 $5,000.00 07/01/2023 $5,000.00
Public Services Program Application Fiscal Year –
Exhibit 6: Agency Capacity Narrative
(Non-Profit Organizations Only)
Describe the roles of key administrators, staff members, and volunteers within your agency that will implement the proposed project. In your description include experience, education, and licensing qualifications.

Describe your agency’s experience in administering government and/or public funds.

Describe your method to sustain project viability over the multi-year process if funding decreases.

Instructions: Complete the table below by marking “YES” or “NO” to the questions listed below.

Question:

YES/ NO
12 2024 2025
Public Services Program Application Fiscal Year –
EXHIBIT 7: Civil Rights Laws Compliance and HUD Good Standing Answer the following questions.

Applicants must be in compliance with applicable civil rights laws and Executive Orders. Applications will be rejected if your agency has any of the following: (1) Any pending civil rights lawsuit instituted by the U.S. Department of Justice; (2) Any noncompliance with civil rights statutes, Executive Orders or regulations as a result of formal administrative proceedings, unless the applicant is operating under a HUD-approved compliance agreement designed to correct the area of noncompliance or is currently negotiating such an agreement; (3) Any unresolved Secretarial charge of discrimination issues under Section 810(g) of the Fair Housing Act, as implemented by 24 CFR 103:400; (4) Any adjudication of a civil rights violation in a civil action brought against the Organization by a private individual, unless the applicant is operating in compliance with a court order designed to correct the area of noncompliance or the applicant has discharged any responsibility arising from such litigation; (5) Any deferral of the processing of applications from the sponsor imposed by HUD under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Attorney General’s Guidelines (28 CFR 50.3) or the HUD Title VI regulations (24 CFR 1.8) and procedures, or under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and HUD Section 504 regulations (24 CFR 8.57). If one or more of these situations exists with your Organization, please attach a brief description.
13 2024 2025 NoNo
E-Signature Authorization
San Bernardino County
Community Development and Housing Departmemt
Community Development Block Grant
- Application
In order to comply with all applicable federal grant regulations, a hard-copy of this E-Signature Authorization containing an original wet signature must be filed with the San Bernardino County Community Development and Housing (CDH) in order for the applicant to electronically sign the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) application documents online. This authorization may only be completed by a registered owner, partner, executive officer, or authorized employee (with proof of authorization) of the applicant submitting this form and must contain an original signature to be submitted to the CDH.

My signature on this form certifies that:

By signing the E- Signature Authorization Form we certify that this agency will also comply with the following:

Applicant Information
Agency Name: Federal Tax ID No.:

Mailing Address: Phone No.:

Email Address: Fax No:

Authorized Signature
Print Name: Print Title:

Signature: Date:

Please send the signed copy of this one page agreement to:

San Bernardino County Community Development and Housing Department 215 North D Street, Suite 302, San Bernardino, CA 94215-0043 Attn: CDBG Application
14 2025 2025 2025 Megan Meadors, Program Director 07/01/2023 Program Director Program Director The Mom & Dad Project 2024 2024 2024 Megan Meadors PO Box 1649 (909) 878-2326 (909) 878-2326 [email protected] Public Services Program Application Fiscal Year –
CDBG Application Checklist
(Non-Profit Organizations Only)
Community-based organizations are required to include one copy of the items listed below. If you are not submitting these items at this time, please notify Community Development and Housing at (909) 501-0600 to make other arrangements. The following information is required before any contract or reimbursement can be completed.
o Summary of agency’s current year General Operating Budget o List of agency’s Board of Directors, including names and addresses o Proof of existing non-profit/tax-exempt status (Letters from the Federal Internal Revenue Service and State Franchise Tax Board) o Current certificate of insurance and amounts covered
o Organizational chart
o Minutes of last Board meeting
o Non- Profit agencies must be Registered in the System of Award Management (SAM) website.

Agency cannot be funded if they have been debarred in the past. o Provide board minutes/letter that authorizes the executive director or program manager to run the project.

Exhibit 1: Organization Information
Exhibit 2: Project Information
Exhibit 3: Community Needs and Target Population
Exhibit 4: Project Budget & Sources
Exhibit 5: Performance & Outcomes
Exhibit 6: Agency Capacity Narrative
Exhibit 7: Civil Rights Laws Compliance and HUD Good Standing Exhibit 8: Signature and Assurances
Application Checklist
_______________
Log Number
(Office Use Only)
1 2025 2024 BBLK24PS-022 2024 2025
Public Services Program Application Fiscal Year –
Exhibit 1: Organization Information
Organization Name:

Organization Address:

City/State/Zip:

Phone:

Fax:

Email:

Applicant Type:

Authorized Person Name:

Authorized Person’s Title:

Address:

City/State/Zip:

Phone:

Fax:

Email:

Application Contact Person’s Name:

Application Contact Person’s Title:

Explain the Agency’s 1) Mission, 2) Purpose, 3) Population Served, 4) Number of years serving population, 5) Supportive Services, their Funding Sources, and Start/End Dates. 2 [email protected] San Bernardino County Library 268 W. Hospitality Lane 3rd Floor, Suite 301 2025 County Librarian The San Bernardino County Library System is a network of branch libraries that serve a diverse population over a vast geographic area. We strive to provide equal access to information, technology, programs, and services for all the people who call San Bernardino County home. Our Adult Literacy Program has been in place over 30 years, allowing us to help those struggling with illiteracy in our communities. This branch is currently funded exclusively by San Bernardino County Library but will still work towards expanding our goal to help literacy learners get one-on-one tutoring and meet their literacy goals. 909-3872220 909-387-2288 Regional Manager Melanie Orosco 268 W. Hospitality Lane 3rd Floor, Suite 301 San Bernardino / CA / 92415 CDBG Funding 2024 [email protected] 909-387-2220 909-387-2288 Stephanie Oritz San Bernardino / CA / 92415 Public Services Program Application Fiscal Year –
Exhibit 2: Project Information
Project Title:

Project Address:

Moving forward we hope to continually increase the quality of materials and services that the Big Bear Lake Branch is able to provide. See attached document for more detailed explanation.
2024 X
Public Services Program Application Fiscal Year –
EXHIBIT 2A: Countywide Vision
Indicate Yes/No in the table below if any of these countywide vision goals are pertinent to the proposed project.

Countywide Vision
Countywide Vision Yes/ No
Implement the Countywide Vision.

Create, Maintain and Grow Jobs and
Economic Value in the County.

Improve County Government Operations.

Operate in a Fiscally-Responsible and
Business-Like Manner.

Ensure Development of a Well-Planned,
Balanced, and Sustainable County.

Maintain Public Safety.

Provide for the Health and Social Services
Needs of County Residents.

Pursue County Goals and Objectives by
Working with Other Governmental
Agencies.

Provide a brief narrative of how your project meets the Countywide Vision:
4 Yes 2025 Yes NoYes No
By tutoring illiterate adults and providing them the tools to learn to read and write, we help them build self-confidence to accomplish many goals such as applying for jobs, being able to vote and much more. This results in them becoming more socially prepared to participate in all the County has to offer. Additionally, the Adult Literacy program supports the county’s Cradle to Career Road Map to achieve the Countywide vision. When we teach illiterate adults to read, we are not only helping them but are also helping their children, as parents who read are able to support the literacy support a child needs to succeed.

No 2024 No No
Public Services Program Application Fiscal Year –
Exhibit 3: Community Needs and Target Population
Community Needs Target Population
Public Service
Needs:

Yes/No Proposed Community: Yes/No
Senior Services Low and Moderate Persons
Handicapped
Services
Low and Moderate
Households
Youth Services Abused Children
Child Care
Services
Handicapped Persons
Transportation
Services
Illiterate Persons
Substance Abuse
Services
Homeless Persons
Employment
Training
Migrant Farm Workers
Health Services Elderly People
Lead Hazard
Screening
Crime
Awareness
5 City/Target Area of Project Beneficiaries
Participating Cities: (i.e Redlands, Colton, Yucaipa)
Big Bear Lake
2025 No No NoNo No No No Yes No Yes No2024 No No Yes No No NoYes Public Services Program Application Fiscal Year –
Exhibit 3: Community Needs and Target Population (continued) Describe the geographic boundaries of the neighborhood, community or area in which clients of the proposed program reside (attach a map if needed):

HUD Demographics: (Yes/No)
 Does this project help prevent homelessness?
 Does this project help the homeless?
 Does this project help those with HIV or AIDS?
 Does this project primarily help persons with disabilities? Summarize the description of your project to include 1) priority, 2) sub-activity, 3) population(s) to be served, and 4) accomplishment level, and 5) services to be provided. 6 2025 No
Big Bear Lake
Yes No 2024 No
The San Bernardino County Library (SBCL), Big Bear Lake Branch Adult Literacy Services Program will provide programming and instruction for low-to-moderate income illiterate adults and senior residents of Big Bear Lake. Individualized tutoring and one-on-one Literacy instruction (reading, spelling, and basic computer skills) will be provided to qualifying adult participants during Fiscal Year 24-25. Library Adult Literacy Services are provided free of charge to all learners participating in the program. Direct services and assistance are provided by Library staff as well as a ream of trained Literacy Tutors. Dedicated tutoring space and special Adult Literacy Program materials (leveled student readers, workbooks, dictionaries, GED Test Prep packets) are provided to participating learners at no charge. Learners are strongly encouraged to attend free Basic Computer Skills Classes taught in the library. Those with young children are encouraged to attend Early Learning and Preschool Storytime Activities to foster a love of reading and ensure school-age readiness. The Big Bear Lake Branch is dedicated in improving the literacy rates in the Big Bear Lake community.

Public Services Program Application Fiscal Year –
Describe how this project meets the priority population and activities selected.

Explain why this project is needed and what evidence can you substantiate the need.

Describe what gaps of service in the county this project fills.

What are the critical factors for the success of your project (include both financial and human resources)? For instance, is this the only funding for this project? What happens if funding decreases? Does this project rely on only one source of leveraging? Is there adequate staff involved with the project if there is project turnover? Please address any factor that is critical to project success.
7 This program is funded primarily through the Library Department budget. Additional State and County funding helps the Library Department to expand the program and reach a larger audience than would be possible through internal funding alone. The Literacy Program is a multi-branch program, with branch staff interacting with learners and tutors while reporting is overseen by administrative staff. We have taken steps to ensure that any staff turnover will not impede the Literacy Program and that services would continue to be offered through the cross-training of staff.
2024 2025
The Adult Literacy Services Program assesses illiterate and presumed low-income adults and senior residents of Big Bear Lake, and provides those that qualify with programming, tutoring, and instruction to aid them in meeting their literacy goals.

Per recent U.S. National Assessment of Adult Literacy, one in seven adults have difficulty reading anything more challenging than a child’s picture book. It is estimated that at 3.4 million Californians fall at the “Below Basic” Literacy Level. In the County of San Bernardino alone, it is estimated that at least 500,000 adults cannot read at all. This service provides assistance to adults who fall into this category.

This program focuses on adult individuals who are illiterate or who have low literacy skills. The County Library Adult Literacy Program provides a no cost alternative for adults to gain these skills.

Public Services Program Application Fiscal Year –
Exhibit 4: Project Budget & Sources
Project Budget
SB County Share: ($) Other Source: ($)
Personnel
Equipment (Rental, Lease or Purchase)
Consultant Services
(Auditing, Accounting or Payroll)
Space Rent
Insurance
Consumable Supplies
Other
Total Costs
Total Project Budget Cost: (CDBG Share + Other Source)
8 2025 $10,000.00 2024 $0.00 $10,000.00 $0.00 $10,000.00 Public Services Program Application Fiscal Year –
Exhibit 4A: CDBG Funds Requested and Leveraging Information Indicate the amount being requested by the city.

Source of
Funding:

Type of Funding: (Grant Name,
EFSP Money)
Amount ($): Date
Available:
(11/22/2016)
Federal
Funding
State
Funding
County
Funding
Private
Funding
Other:

Total Leveraging Funds
$0.00 2025 $10,000.00 $0.00 2024 Big Bear $0.00 07/01/2024 08/01/2024 Public Services Program Application Fiscal Year –
Exhibit 5: Performance and Outcomes
Definitions:

Unduplicated Clients: The number clients/persons projected to be served during the program year (e.g. 25 clients, 50 seniors):

Duplicated Clients: The estimated yearly units of service (duplicated, e.g. 25 clients x 10 visits=250 units of service):

Indicate a timeline of services provided to client(s) in order to meet project outcome(s).

Describe how your agency determines client(s) success.

Describe your methodology to evaluate project outcomes. 10 2025 Literacy Tutoring
Learners are assessed by branch staff and matched with a tutor. They are scheduled for weekly tutoring sessions in order to meet individual goals set by the learner and plan new goals as the learner progresses.

We track the number of goals met in correlation to the number of goals set by the individual learners.
10 100 2024
Learners set individual goals that they want to meet and tutors help learners meet those goals.

Regular assessments of the learner’s progress are used to track improvement.

Fill-in the table below with dates for submission of reimbursement claims and the estimated amount of each.

Date of Reimbursement: Amount ($):

Total Reimbursement:
($)
11 2025 2025
As mandated by the California State Library Literacy Services (CLLS), individual adult learners are required to list one or more personal Literacy goals via the Roles & Goals Intake Form. 75% of total Big Bear Lake Adult Literacy Program learners are anticipated to achieve one or more of their person goals set during program year 23-24. We plan to meet 25% of our tutor/learner pairing goal each quarter; 25% by October 1st, 50% by January 1st, 75% by April 1st, and 100% by June 30th.
2024 2024 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 04/01/2025 $10,000.00 10/01/2024 06/30/2025 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 01/01/2025 Public Services Program Application Fiscal Year –
Exhibit 6: Agency Capacity Narrative
(Non-Profit Organizations Only)
Describe the roles of key administrators, staff members, and volunteers within your agency that will implement the proposed project. In your description include experience, education, and licensing qualifications.

Describe your agency’s experience in administering government and/or public funds.

Describe your method to sustain project viability over the multi-year process if funding decreases.

Instructions: Complete the table below by marking “YES” or “NO” to the questions listed below.

Question:

YES/ NO
12 No 2025 No
This is a multi-branch program with a network of branch and administrative staff and a portion of the overall library budget set aside to improve and continue this program. We have been funded for the Adult Literacy Program and administrating CDBG grants and funds since 1984.
2024 No No No
Regional Manager, Library Events Coordinator, Admin Librarian I, Branch Managers, Library Assistants, Volunteer Tutors. See Attachment for d
Public Services Program Application Fiscal Year –
EXHIBIT 7: Civil Rights Laws Compliance and HUD Good Standing Answer the following questions.

Applicants must be in compliance with applicable civil rights laws and Executive Orders. Applications will be rejected if your agency has any of the following: (1) Any pending civil rights lawsuit instituted by the U.S. Department of Justice; (2) Any noncompliance with civil rights statutes, Executive Orders or regulations as a result of formal administrative proceedings, unless the applicant is operating under a HUD-approved compliance agreement designed to correct the area of noncompliance or is currently negotiating such an agreement; (3) Any unresolved Secretarial charge of discrimination issues under Section 810(g) of the Fair Housing Act, as implemented by 24 CFR 103:400; (4) Any adjudication of a civil rights violation in a civil action brought against the Organization by a private individual, unless the applicant is operating in compliance with a court order designed to correct the area of noncompliance or the applicant has discharged any responsibility arising from such litigation; (5) Any deferral of the processing of applications from the sponsor imposed by HUD under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Attorney General’s Guidelines (28 CFR 50.3) or the HUD Title VI regulations (24 CFR 1.8) and procedures, or under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and HUD Section 504 regulations (24 CFR 8.57). If one or more of these situations exists with your Organization, please attach a brief description.
13 2024 2025 NoNo
E-Signature Authorization
San Bernardino County
Community Development and Housing Departmemt
Community Development Block Grant
- Application
In order to comply with all applicable federal grant regulations, a hard-copy of this E-Signature Authorization containing an original wet signature must be filed with the San Bernardino County Community Development and Housing (CDH) in order for the applicant to electronically sign the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) application documents online. This authorization may only be completed by a registered owner, partner, executive officer, or authorized employee (with proof of authorization) of the applicant submitting this form and must contain an original signature to be submitted to the CDH.

My signature on this form certifies that:

By signing the E- Signature Authorization Form we certify that this agency will also comply with the following:

Applicant Information
Agency Name: Federal Tax ID No.:

Mailing Address: Phone No.:

Email Address: Fax No:

Authorized Signature
Print Name: Print Title:

Signature: Date:

Please send the signed copy of this one page agreement to:

San Bernardino County Community Development and Housing Department 215 North D Street, Suite 302, San Bernardino, CA 94215-0043 Attn: CDBG Application
14 2025 2025 2025 Melanie Orosco County Librarian County Librarian County Librarian San Bernardino County Library 2024 2024 2024 Melanie Orosco 95-6002748 268 W. Hospitality Lane 3rd Floor (909) 387-2220 (909) 387-2220 [email protected] (909) 387-2288 (909) 387-2288 Public Services Program Application Fiscal Year –
CDBG Application Checklist
(Non-Profit Organizations Only)
Community-based organizations are required to include one copy of the items listed below. If you are not submitting these items at this time, please notify Community Development and Housing at (909) 501-0600 to make other arrangements. The following information is required before any contract or reimbursement can be completed.
o Summary of agency’s current year General Operating Budget o List of agency’s Board of Directors, including names and addresses o Proof of existing non-profit/tax-exempt status (Letters from the Federal Internal Revenue Service and State Franchise Tax Board) o Current certificate of insurance and amounts covered
o Organizational chart
o Minutes of last Board meeting
o Non- Profit agencies must be Registered in the System of Award Management (SAM) website.

Agency cannot be funded if they have been debarred in the past. o Provide board minutes/letter that authorizes the executive director or program manager to run the project.

Exhibit 1: Organization Information
Exhibit 2: Project Information
Exhibit 3: Community Needs and Target Population
Exhibit 4: Project Budget & Sources
Exhibit 5: Performance & Outcomes
Exhibit 6: Agency Capacity Narrative
Exhibit 7: Civil Rights Laws Compliance and HUD Good Standing Exhibit 8: Signature and Assurances
Application Checklist
_______________
Log Number
(Office Use Only)
1 ✔
✔
2025 2024 ✔
✔
✔
BBLK24PS-035 ✔
✔
✔
2024 2025 ✔
Public Services Program Application Fiscal Year –
Exhibit 1: Organization Information
Organization Name:

Organization Address:

City/State/Zip:

Phone:

Fax:

Email:

Applicant Type:

Authorized Person Name:

Authorized Person’s Title:

Address:

City/State/Zip:

Phone:

Fax:

Email:

Application Contact Person’s Name:

Application Contact Person’s Title:

Explain the Agency’s 1) Mission, 2) Purpose, 3) Population Served, 4) Number of years serving population, 5) Supportive Services, their Funding Sources, and Start/End Dates. 2 [email protected] Soroptimist International of Big Bear Valley (SIBBV) PO Box 6505 2025 President SIBBV Soroptimist International of Big Bear Valley's (SIBBV) mission is to improve the lives of women and children through programs leading to social & economic empowerment. The purpose is to provide tuition assistance for low-moderate to low-income families enrolled in Beyond the Bell (BTB), a before and after school Childcare facility. This year, forty-two children (78) from thirty-six (72) families are being supported with tuition assistance over the 12-month period creating over three hundred (300) unique events for assistance. SIBBV has been supporting this program financially since its inception in 1989 with seed money for the initial startup supplies, to yearly contributions to needy families including replacement of supplies and upkeep of the program. SIBBV has been a past recipient of CDBG funds from the early 2000's providing funding for BTB on an ongoing basis annually from 1989 through fundraising & other grant opportunities.
(909)866-9700 (909)866-9706 Regional Manager - Big Bear Recreation and Park District Christina Marmolejo PO Box 6505 Big Bear Lake / California / 92315 Public Service Project 2024 [email protected] (909)866-9700 (909)866-9706 BIll Hoffman Big Bear Lake / California / 92315 Public Services Program Application Fiscal Year –
Exhibit 2: Project Information
Project Title:

Project Address:

Will this project provide an opportunity to hire minority-owned and women owned businesses? If YES, describe what actions will be completed to implement such subcontracting plans to monitor this component of the proposed project. If NO, discuss why and what actions are being taken to encourage minority-women businesses to apply for this project. 3 If this is an Expansion of Service to previously funded CDBG project, please explain how this is an expansion of service?. (i.e For 2015 we proposed 60 units of service, this year the agency is planning to serve 100 units of service)
Is this a New Public Service Project, or request to expand services to an existing CDBG project? Expansions of Service to an Existing Project 2025
Though no minorities are directly targeted for employment by the program it allows low / moderate to low-income families to enroll children in BTB, the before and after school Childcare program, thus allowing them to maintain full time employment within the Big Bear Valley. The population of families served include up to 50% minority families and over 80% of staff employed are women of various backgrounds.

Yes 44500 Baldwin Lane Sugarloaf, CA 92314/765 North Stanfield Cutoff Big Bear Lake, CA 92315 Soroptimist International Childcare Tuition Assistance As in previous years the funds allocated from this Grant have been used to augment the current fundraising by assisting forty-two (78) children from thirty-six (72) families for half fee assistance, these funds usually last 3-4 months of the 12-month allocation from Club funds for the required families.
2024 Not Applicable X
Public Services Program Application Fiscal Year –
EXHIBIT 2A: Countywide Vision
Indicate Yes/No in the table below if any of these countywide vision goals are pertinent to the proposed project.

Countywide Vision
Countywide Vision Yes/ No
Implement the Countywide Vision.

Create, Maintain and Grow Jobs and
Economic Value in the County.

Improve County Government Operations.

Operate in a Fiscally-Responsible and
Business-Like Manner.

Ensure Development of a Well-Planned,
Balanced, and Sustainable County.

Maintain Public Safety.

Provide for the Health and Social Services
Needs of County Residents.

Pursue County Goals and Objectives by
Working with Other Governmental
Agencies.

Provide a brief narrative of how your project meets the Countywide Vision:
4 Yes 2025 Yes Yes Yes Yes
SIBBV follows the Countywide Vision through its cooperation with BBVRPD, A Special Districts Dept of the Department of Public Works, who are mandated to meet all aspects of the County's Vision statement. The Health and Social services of low-moderate to Low-income families are provided through tuition assistance, allowing them an increased ability for longer work hours and more workdays, increasing their economic value to the County. Children from latchkey families are supervised by professional staff employed by the County who provide a safe fun learning environment.

Yes 2024 Yes Yes
Public Services Program Application Fiscal Year –
Exhibit 3: Community Needs and Target Population
Community Needs Target Population
Public Service
Needs:

Yes/No Proposed Community: Yes/No
Senior Services Low and Moderate Persons
Handicapped
Services
Low and Moderate
Households
Youth Services Abused Children
Child Care
Services
Handicapped Persons
Transportation
Services
Illiterate Persons
Substance Abuse
Services
Homeless Persons
Employment
Training
Migrant Farm Workers
Health Services Elderly People
Lead Hazard
Screening
Crime
Awareness
5 City/Target Area of Project Beneficiaries
Participating Cities: (i.e Redlands, Colton, Yucaipa)
Big Bear City, Big Bear Lake/ Big Bear Valley
2025 Yes NoYes Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes No2024 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Public Services Program Application Fiscal Year –
Exhibit 3: Community Needs and Target Population (continued) Describe the geographic boundaries of the neighborhood, community or area in which clients of the proposed program reside (attach a map if needed):

Yes Yes 2024 No
SIBBV requests funds for this project to augment the tuition assistance awarded to children from low-moderate to low-income families enrolled in BTB, a County Special Districts Dept. operated Before and After School Childcare facility. Latchkey school children from kindergarten to Grade 6 of working families are awarded the assistance. Families must meet the low-moderate to low-income criteria, no discrimination is made based on race, ethnicity, nationality, disability, religion, homelessness, creed or political opinion. Over 50% of the enrolled populations are eligible for tuition assistance as low-moderate to low-income families.

SIBBV were instrumental in the creation of BTB formally RKC in 1991 and have been financially supporting it through aggressive fundraising and previous CDBG fund awards.

Tuition Assistance will be provided for children from low-moderate to low-income families for the Before and After School Childcare facility, transportation from the two local Elementary schools is also provided to get children to the site.

Public Services Program Application Fiscal Year –
Describe how this project meets the priority population and activities selected.

Explain why this project is needed and what evidence can you substantiate the need.

Describe what gaps of service in the county this project fills.

What are the critical factors for the success of your project (include both financial and human resources)? For instance, is this the only funding for this project? What happens if funding decreases? Does this project rely on only one source of leveraging? Is there adequate staff involved with the project if there is project turnover? Please address any factor that is critical to project success.
7 SIBBV will continue to volunteer services for administration of these funds, to that 100% of all CDBG grant monies go directly to benefit the young elementary school students in need of protected quality childcare. SIBBV will continue to apply for grants and aggressively fund raise to ensure that enough families assistance, ensuring the longevity of the childcare program. 2024 2025
The priority population of low-moderate to low-income families are met by being provided with 50% Tuition assistance to meet the monthly costs associated with enrolment in BTB Childcare facility. Though no direct targeting of other population groups is performed, i.e. Abused Children, all can be helped as no criteria limits their ability to apply and receive assistance besides family income levels.

The need for subsidized care has greatly increased over the last few years. Enrolment crashed to the point the program almost ceased to operate 2 years ago, diminishing from 3 sites down to 2 as enrolment declined dramatically. SIBBV step in and assisted with are branding of the program and an aggressive awareness program purporting the tuition assistance and saw the growth in the program adding back the before school element.

It is inconceivable that TK through Grade 5 children should be left at home while their parents are at work, particularly in this remote mountainous community. If we do not receive this grant funding, there will be some parents who will be forced to make the decision to quit work or leave small school aged children at home alone.

Public Services Program Application Fiscal Year –
Exhibit 4: Project Budget & Sources
Project Budget
SB County Share: ($) Other Source: ($)
Personnel
Equipment (Rental, Lease or Purchase)
Consultant Services
(Auditing, Accounting or Payroll)
Space Rent
Insurance
Consumable Supplies
Other
Total Costs
Total Project Budget Cost: (CDBG Share + Other Source)
8 2025 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $40,000.00 2024 Tuition Assistance $45,000.00 $40,000.00 Public Services Program Application Fiscal Year –
Exhibit 4A: CDBG Funds Requested and Leveraging Information Indicate the amount being requested by the city.

Source of
Funding:

Type of Funding: (Grant Name,
EFSP Money)
Amount ($): Date
Available:
(11/22/2016)
Federal
Funding
State
Funding
County
Funding
Private
Funding
Other:

Total Leveraging Funds
$40,000.00 2025 07/01/2023 07/01/2023 $5,000.00 $20,000.00 2024 Big Bear $20,000.00 Endowement Fundraising Public Services Program Application Fiscal Year –
Exhibit 5: Performance and Outcomes
Definitions:

Unduplicated Clients: The number clients/persons projected to be served during the program year (e.g. 25 clients, 50 seniors):

Duplicated Clients: The estimated yearly units of service (duplicated, e.g. 25 clients x 10 visits=250 units of service):

Indicate a timeline of services provided to client(s) in order to meet project outcome(s).

Describe how your agency determines client(s) success.

Describe your methodology to evaluate project outcomes. 10 2025 Tuition Assistance
Funds would cover tuition assistance of the anticipated children for a period of three months out of the yearly operation of the before and after school childcare program that SIBBV financially supports.

The program coordinator evaluates on an ongoing basis the number of assistance requests compared to approvals in relation to previous years.
78 936 2024
Success is determined by the continuation of enrolment by families on a monthly basis in the program, thus keeping children supervised in a quality program as opposed to unsupervised at home.

Fill-in the table below with dates for submission of reimbursement claims and the estimated amount of each.

Date of Reimbursement: Amount ($):

Total Reimbursement:
($)
11 2025 2025
The requested funds would cover tuition assistance for the anticipated clients of 78 children for a period of 3-4 months out of the annual ongoing operation. July 31st, 2024, $2000 at 40% of requested funds. August 31st, 2024, $1500 at 30% of requested funds. September 30th, 2024, $1500 at 30% of requested funds. The remainder of the year SIBBV funds would support the program.
2024 2024 $1,500.00 09/30/2024 $5,000.00 07/31/2024 $2,000.00 $1,500.00 08/31/2024 Public Services Program Application Fiscal Year –
Exhibit 6: Agency Capacity Narrative
(Non-Profit Organizations Only)
Describe the roles of key administrators, staff members, and volunteers within your agency that will implement the proposed project. In your description include experience, education, and licensing qualifications.

Describe your agency’s experience in administering government and/or public funds.

Describe your method to sustain project viability over the multi-year process if funding decreases.

Instructions: Complete the table below by marking “YES” or “NO” to the questions listed below.

Question:

YES/ NO
12 No 2025
SIBBV will continue to apply for grants and will aggressively fund raise to ensure the longevity of the Childcare program, an ongoing process since its inception in 1991. SIBBV has been a past recipient of CDBG funds and has successfully administered those funds since first being awarded in early 2000's.
2024 No No No
President ensures directors perform their duties as related to operations. Program directors ensure income eligibility criteria are met.

Public Services Program Application Fiscal Year –
EXHIBIT 7: Civil Rights Laws Compliance and HUD Good Standing Answer the following questions.

Applicants must be in compliance with applicable civil rights laws and Executive Orders. Applications will be rejected if your agency has any of the following: (1) Any pending civil rights lawsuit instituted by the U.S. Department of Justice; (2) Any noncompliance with civil rights statutes, Executive Orders or regulations as a result of formal administrative proceedings, unless the applicant is operating under a HUD-approved compliance agreement designed to correct the area of noncompliance or is currently negotiating such an agreement; (3) Any unresolved Secretarial charge of discrimination issues under Section 810(g) of the Fair Housing Act, as implemented by 24 CFR 103:400; (4) Any adjudication of a civil rights violation in a civil action brought against the Organization by a private individual, unless the applicant is operating in compliance with a court order designed to correct the area of noncompliance or the applicant has discharged any responsibility arising from such litigation; (5) Any deferral of the processing of applications from the sponsor imposed by HUD under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Attorney General’s Guidelines (28 CFR 50.3) or the HUD Title VI regulations (24 CFR 1.8) and procedures, or under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and HUD Section 504 regulations (24 CFR 8.57). If one or more of these situations exists with your Organization, please attach a brief description.
13 2024 2025 NoNo
E-Signature Authorization
San Bernardino County
Community Development and Housing Departmemt
Community Development Block Grant
- Application
In order to comply with all applicable federal grant regulations, a hard-copy of this E-Signature Authorization containing an original wet signature must be filed with the San Bernardino County Community Development and Housing (CDH) in order for the applicant to electronically sign the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) application documents online. This authorization may only be completed by a registered owner, partner, executive officer, or authorized employee (with proof of authorization) of the applicant submitting this form and must contain an original signature to be submitted to the CDH.

My signature on this form certifies that:

By signing the E- Signature Authorization Form we certify that this agency will also comply with the following:

Applicant Information
Agency Name: Federal Tax ID No.:

Mailing Address: Phone No.:

Email Address: Fax No:

Authorized Signature
Print Name: Print Title:

Signature: Date:

Please send the signed copy of this one page agreement to:

San Bernardino County Community Development and Housing Department 215 North D Street, Suite 302, San Bernardino, CA 94215-0043 Attn: CDBG Application
14 2025 2025 2025 Christina Marmolejo 12/08/2023 President President Soroptimist International Child Care Tuition Assistance 2024 2024 2024 Christina Marmolejo 95-3375418 PO Box 65505 Big Bear Lake, CA (909) 800-9943 (909) 800-9943 [email protected] Public Services Program Application Fiscal Year –
CDBG Application Checklist
(Non-Profit Organizations Only)
Community-based organizations are required to include one copy of the items listed below. If you are not submitting these items at this time, please notify Community Development and Housing at (909) 501-0600 to make other arrangements. The following information is required before any contract or reimbursement can be completed.
o Summary of agency’s current year General Operating Budget o List of agency’s Board of Directors, including names and addresses o Proof of existing non-profit/tax-exempt status (Letters from the Federal Internal Revenue Service and State Franchise Tax Board) o Current certificate of insurance and amounts covered
o Organizational chart
o Minutes of last Board meeting
o Non- Profit agencies must be Registered in the System of Award Management (SAM) website.

Agency cannot be funded if they have been debarred in the past. o Provide board minutes/letter that authorizes the executive director or program manager to run the project.

Exhibit 1: Organization Information
Exhibit 2: Project Information
Exhibit 3: Community Needs and Target Population
Exhibit 4: Project Budget & Sources
Exhibit 5: Performance & Outcomes
Exhibit 6: Agency Capacity Narrative
Exhibit 7: Civil Rights Laws Compliance and HUD Good Standing Exhibit 8: Signature and Assurances
Application Checklist
_______________
Log Number
(Office Use Only)
1 ✔
✔
2025 2024 ✔
✔
✔
BBLK24PS-036 ✔
✔
✔
2024 2025 ✔
Public Services Program Application Fiscal Year –
Exhibit 1: Organization Information
Organization Name:

Organization Address:

City/State/Zip:

Phone:

Fax:

Email:

Applicant Type:

Authorized Person Name:

Authorized Person’s Title:

Address:

City/State/Zip:

Phone:

Fax:

Email:

Application Contact Person’s Name:

Application Contact Person’s Title:

Explain the Agency’s 1) Mission, 2) Purpose, 3) Population Served, 4) Number of years serving population, 5) Supportive Services, their Funding Sources, and Start/End Dates. 2 [email protected] United States Adaptive Recreation Center Post Office Box 2897, 43101 Goldmine Drive 2025 Executive Director Founded in 1983 and serving persons with physical and developmental disabilities, the mission of USARC is to teach skills, through challenging outdoor therapeutic recreation programs that, in turn open doors of opportunity to persons with disabilities as well as enhancing their living environment. Recreation is a defined Public Service in CDBG 570.202 – Eligible Rehabilitation and Preservation Activities.USARC programming improves self-esteem, health and well-being by enabling personal achievement, developing awareness of potential and increasing the ability to overcome limitations.USARC offers the only year-round alpine therapeutic recreation program accessible to Southern Californians with disabilities, staffed by certified recreation therapists.Funding Sources include Special Events, Community Members, Program Fees, Government grants and Private Foundations.This funding will support programs July 1, 2024 through June 30, 2025
(909) 584-0269 (909) 354-3220 Executive Director Sara Rosell-Gavigan Post Office Box 2897, 43101 Goldmine Drive Big Bear Lake / CA / 92315-2897 Non-Profit 501 (c)(3) 2024 [email protected] (909) 939-7197 (909) 354-3220 Sara Rosell-Gavigan Big Bear Lake / CA / 92315-2897 Public Services Program Application Fiscal Year –
Exhibit 2: Project Information
Project Title:

Project Address:

Will this project provide an opportunity to hire minority-owned and women owned businesses? If YES, describe what actions will be completed to implement such subcontracting plans to monitor this component of the proposed project. If NO, discuss why and what actions are being taken to encourage minority-women businesses to apply for this project. 3 If this is an Expansion of Service to previously funded CDBG project, please explain how this is an expansion of service?. (i.e For 2015 we proposed 60 units of service, this year the agency is planning to serve 100 units of service)
Is this a New Public Service Project, or request to expand services to an existing CDBG project? New Public Service Project 2025
USARC does not hire businesses. USARC does not discriminate in the hiring of staff, the recruitment of volunteers or in provision of services. In the past year, USARC served 522 persons with disabilities. 57% were of a minority ethnic origin, 34% female, 28% resided in households headed by females, 100% have a disability, 53% are children aged 18 and under and 44% reside in households reporting low incomes.

No43101 Goldmine Drive, Big Bear Lake, CA 92315 Outdoor Therapeutic Recreation for Persons with Disabilities Not Applicable
2024 X
Public Services Program Application Fiscal Year –
EXHIBIT 2A: Countywide Vision
Indicate Yes/No in the table below if any of these countywide vision goals are pertinent to the proposed project.

Countywide Vision
Countywide Vision Yes/ No
Implement the Countywide Vision.

Create, Maintain and Grow Jobs and
Economic Value in the County.

Improve County Government Operations.

Operate in a Fiscally-Responsible and
Business-Like Manner.

Ensure Development of a Well-Planned,
Balanced, and Sustainable County.

Maintain Public Safety.

Provide for the Health and Social Services
Needs of County Residents.

Pursue County Goals and Objectives by
Working with Other Governmental
Agencies.

Provide a brief narrative of how your project meets the Countywide Vision:
4 Yes 2025 Yes Yes Yes Yes
Masterfully combining the geography and natural environment with collaborative partnerships in community health and recreation, USARC's therapeutic recreation programs result in sustainable quality of life changes for those disadvantaged by disability and poverty. Through its health and wellness offerings, USARC not only helps diminish infrastructure dependence, but it produces employment and volunteer opportunities for county residents, as well as rewarding and engaging motivations for one-time visitors to become repeat guests and consumers of county businesses.

No 2024 Yes Yes
Public Services Program Application Fiscal Year –
Exhibit 3: Community Needs and Target Population
Community Needs Target Population
Public Service
Needs:

Yes/No Proposed Community: Yes/No
Senior Services Low and Moderate Persons
Handicapped
Services
Low and Moderate
Households
Youth Services Abused Children
Child Care
Services
Handicapped Persons
Transportation
Services
Illiterate Persons
Substance Abuse
Services
Homeless Persons
Employment
Training
Migrant Farm Workers
Health Services Elderly People
Lead Hazard
Screening
Crime
Awareness
5 City/Target Area of Project Beneficiaries
Participating Cities: (i.e Redlands, Colton, Yucaipa)
Big Bear Lake
2025 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes2024 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes NoYes Public Services Program Application Fiscal Year –
Exhibit 3: Community Needs and Target Population (continued) Describe the geographic boundaries of the neighborhood, community or area in which clients of the proposed program reside (attach a map if needed):

HUD Demographics: (Yes/No)
 Does this project help prevent homelessness?
 Does this project help the homeless?
 Does this project help those with HIV or AIDS?
 Does this project primarily help persons with disabilities? Summarize the description of your project to include 1) priority, 2) sub-activity, 3) population(s) to be served, and 4) accomplishment level, and 5) services to be provided. 6 2025 Yes
Big Bear Lake, Lake Arrowhead, Running Springs and San Bernardino No No 2024 No
Thepriorityof this project is providing 200 outdoor therapeutic recreation lessons to 100 persons with disabilities residing in San Bernardino County, 44% in household reporting low incomes.Sub Activity: USARC will use CDBG funding for personnel costs related to the PROGRAM AND OUTREACH COORDINATOR.It is the responsibility of this position to recruit, train and supervise volunteers that provide service to recruited San Bernardino County Residents with disabilities alongside USARC’s certified recreation therapists.Population:
100% of these funds will benefit residents of San Bernardino County with disabilities, 44% reside in households reporting low incomes.Disabilities served are cognitive disabilities including autism spectrum disorder, traumatic brain injuries, spinal cord injuries, spina bifida, muscular dystrophy, cerebral palsy, vision and hearing loss, amputations and many more.Accomplishment Level:USARC projects an accomplishment level for this project at 100%.Services to be provided: Outdoor Therapeutic Recreation offerings include snowboarding, adaptive skiing and snowshoeing in winter months and water skiing, kayaking, stand-up paddleboarding, cycling, sailing, fishing and camping in summer months.

Public Services Program Application Fiscal Year –
Describe how this project meets the priority population and activities selected.

Explain why this project is needed and what evidence can you substantiate the need.

Describe what gaps of service in the county this project fills.

USARC is proud of its' fiscal responsibility during challenging financial times as evidenced by fundraising and administrative costs at 9% in the most recent 990. The organization subsidizes 75% of the actual cost of each lesson through an annual membership drive, special events, foundations and government funding such as CDBG. 2024 2025
100% of persons participating have a disability, 44% reside in San Bernardino households reporting low income, 57% are of a minority ethnic origin, 34% female, 28% resided in households headed by females 53% are children aged 18 and under.

Recreation and sport contribute to a healthy and successful lifestyle. Coleman, (1993), "Contends that leisure assists in maintaining physical and mental health by helping people resist stress induced illness, leading to an enhanced well-being." Researchers in the field of therapeutic recreation note the important relationship between leisure engagement, community integration, quality of life and physical health.

Outreach coordinator recruits/trains 175 volunteers that provide services to San Bernardino County residents with disabilities. USARC's Memorandum of Understanding with Bear Valley Unified School District provides winter adaptive ski lessons, as well as summer kayaking and water safety lessons for students with disabilities filing a gap for children with disabilities. No local schools employs adaptive Physical Education Specialists so USARC's collaboration provides therapeutic recreation programs with trained staff and volunteers including EXPENSIVE adaptive equipment.

Public Services Program Application Fiscal Year –
Exhibit 4: Project Budget & Sources
Project Budget
SB County Share: ($) Other Source: ($)
Personnel
Equipment (Rental, Lease or Purchase)
Consultant Services
(Auditing, Accounting or Payroll)
Space Rent
Insurance
Consumable Supplies
Other
Total Costs
Total Project Budget Cost: (CDBG Share + Other Source)
8 2025 $10,000.00 2024 $59,200.00 $69,200.00 $59,200.00 $10,000.00 Public Services Program Application Fiscal Year –
Exhibit 4A: CDBG Funds Requested and Leveraging Information Indicate the amount being requested by the city.

Source of
Funding:

Type of Funding: (Grant Name,
EFSP Money)
Amount ($): Date
Available:
(11/22/2016)
Federal
Funding
State
Funding
County
Funding
Private
Funding
Other:

Total Leveraging Funds
$59,200.00 2025 State of CA DBWW 07/01/2024 07/01/2024 $10,000.00 $13,000.00 2024 Big Bear $5,200.00 $41,000.00 06/30/2024 Program Fees Dan Murphy Foundation Public Services Program Application Fiscal Year –
Exhibit 5: Performance and Outcomes
Definitions:

Unduplicated Clients: The number clients/persons projected to be served during the program year (e.g. 25 clients, 50 seniors):

Duplicated Clients: The estimated yearly units of service (duplicated, e.g. 25 clients x 10 visits=250 units of service):

Indicate a timeline of services provided to client(s) in order to meet project outcome(s).

Describe how your agency determines client(s) success.

Describe your methodology to evaluate project outcomes. 10 2025 Outdoor Therapeutic Recreation
USARC tracks outcomes quarterly 9/30 and 12/31 2024 and 3/31 and 6/30/2025. Participants may schedule in April for July, August and September programs and in September for December through March programs.

An online tool, SurveyMonkey evaluates project outcomes. Staff can address feedback on a daily basis and query response for specific grants.
100 200 2024
95% of participants report that: I will participate again, I will recommend USARC programs, this experience makes me more physically active and less likely to become overweight or obese.

Fill-in the table below with dates for submission of reimbursement claims and the estimated amount of each.

Date of Reimbursement: Amount ($):

Total Reimbursement:
($)
11 2025 2025
USARC projects expenditures and performance/accomplishment goals of 25%by 9/30/2024, 50% by 12/31/2024, 75% by 3/31/2025 and 100% by 6/30/2025. 2024 2024 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 03/31/2025 $10,000.00 09/30/2024 06/30/2025 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 12/31/2024 Public Services Program Application Fiscal Year –
Exhibit 6: Agency Capacity Narrative
(Non-Profit Organizations Only)
Describe the roles of key administrators, staff members, and volunteers within your agency that will implement the proposed project. In your description include experience, education, and licensing qualifications.

Describe your agency’s experience in administering government and/or public funds.

Describe your method to sustain project viability over the multi-year process if funding decreases.

Instructions: Complete the table below by marking “YES” or “NO” to the questions listed below.

Question:

YES/ NO
12 No 2025 No
USARC has a proven track record of sound fiscal management and program growth and is proud of its' fiscal responsibility as evidenced by fundraising and administration cost at 9% in the most recent 990.

USARC has received numerous grants from the County of San Bernardino, The State of CA, federal Gov't. and various private foundations.
2024 No No No
Sara Rosell-Gavigan, RTC, CTRS - Executive Director, BA in Recreation Administration with Therapeutic Emphasis; Certified by CBRPC and PSIA
Public Services Program Application Fiscal Year –
EXHIBIT 7: Civil Rights Laws Compliance and HUD Good Standing Answer the following questions.

Applicants must be in compliance with applicable civil rights laws and Executive Orders. Applications will be rejected if your agency has any of the following: (1) Any pending civil rights lawsuit instituted by the U.S. Department of Justice; (2) Any noncompliance with civil rights statutes, Executive Orders or regulations as a result of formal administrative proceedings, unless the applicant is operating under a HUD-approved compliance agreement designed to correct the area of noncompliance or is currently negotiating such an agreement; (3) Any unresolved Secretarial charge of discrimination issues under Section 810(g) of the Fair Housing Act, as implemented by 24 CFR 103:400; (4) Any adjudication of a civil rights violation in a civil action brought against the Organization by a private individual, unless the applicant is operating in compliance with a court order designed to correct the area of noncompliance or the applicant has discharged any responsibility arising from such litigation; (5) Any deferral of the processing of applications from the sponsor imposed by HUD under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Attorney General’s Guidelines (28 CFR 50.3) or the HUD Title VI regulations (24 CFR 1.8) and procedures, or under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and HUD Section 504 regulations (24 CFR 8.57). If one or more of these situations exists with your Organization, please attach a brief description.
13 2024 2025 NoNo
E-Signature Authorization
San Bernardino County
Community Development and Housing Departmemt
Community Development Block Grant
- Application
In order to comply with all applicable federal grant regulations, a hard-copy of this E-Signature Authorization containing an original wet signature must be filed with the San Bernardino County Community Development and Housing (CDH) in order for the applicant to electronically sign the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) application documents online. This authorization may only be completed by a registered owner, partner, executive officer, or authorized employee (with proof of authorization) of the applicant submitting this form and must contain an original signature to be submitted to the CDH.

My signature on this form certifies that:

Big Bear Lake City CouncilFebruary 14, 2024

Big Bear Lake City Council
February 14, 2024