Agenda packet — Brea City Council, May 6, 2025 (part 1 of 3)

City Council Meeting Agenda
Study Session - 5:30 p.m.

General Session - 7:00 p.m.

Tuesday, May 6, 2025, 7:00 PM

COUNCIL CHAMBERS
1 Civic Center Circle
Brea, California 92821
Blair Stewart, Mayor Cecilia Hupp, Mayor Pro Tem Christine Marick, Council Member Marty Simonoff, Council Member Steven Vargas, Council Member This agenda contains a brief general description of each item Council will consider. The City Clerk has on file copies of written documentation relating to each item of business on this Agenda available for public inspection.

Contact the City Clerk’s Office at (714) 990-7756 or view the Agenda and related materials on the City’s website at www.cityofbrea.gov. Materials related to an item on this agenda submitted to the Council after distribution of the agenda packet are available for public inspection in the City Clerk’s Office at 1 Civic Center Circle, Brea, CA during normal business hours. Such documents may also be available on the City’s website subject to staff’s ability to post documents before the meeting.

Procedures for Addressing the Council
The Council encourages interested people to address this legislative body by making a brief presentation on a public hearing item when the Mayor calls the item or address other items under Matters from the Audience. State law generally prohibits the City Council from responding to or acting upon matters not listed on this agenda.

The Council encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons the opportunity to speak, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. Council rules prohibit clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. Please silence all cell phones and other electronic equipment while the Council is in session. Thank you.

Written comments may be submitted in advance of the meeting by emailing [email protected].

Written comments received by 3 p.m. on the day of the meeting will be provided to the Council, will be made available to the public at the meeting, and will be included in the official record of the meeting.

Special Accommodations
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk’s Office at (714) 990-7757. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable City staff to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. (28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title II) Important Notice
The City of Brea shows both live broadcasts and replays of City Council Meetings on Brea Cable Channel 3 and over the Internet at www.cityofbrea.gov. Your attendance at this public meeting may result in the recording and broadcast of your image and/or voice as previously described.

1. STUDY SESSION - EXECUTIVE CONFERENCE ROOM 3RD FLOOR - 5:30 P.M. 1A. Call to Order/Roll Call
1B. Public Comment
1C. Clarify Regular Meeting Topics
1D. FY 2025-27 Budget Workshop: Preview of Operating and Seven-Year Capital Improvement Program Budgets
1E. Council Member Reports/Requests
1F. Study Session Adjournment

2. GENERAL SESSION - COUNCIL CHAMBERS PLAZA LEVEL - 7:00 P.M. 2A. Call to Order/Roll Call
2B. Pledge of Allegiance: Boy Scout Troop 707
2C. Invocation: Pastor Rick Crockett, Crosspointe Church 2D. Presentation: Richard Nixon Presidential Library and Museum 2E. Proclamation: National Public Works Week
2F. Proclamation: National Police Week
2G. Report - Prior Study Session
2H. Community Announcements
2I. Matters from the Audience
2J. Response to Public Inquiries

3. PUBLIC HEARING
This portion of the meeting is for matters that legally require an opportunity for public input.

Audience participation is encouraged and is limited to 5 minutes per speaker. 3A. Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment (ZOTA) No. 2025-01
— 1. Waive full reading and introduce Ordinance No. 1259 titled “An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Brea Amending the Brea City Code by Adopting Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment No. 2025-01 and Approving CEQA Exemption Determination”; — 2. Approve a California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Exemption Determination; and — 3. Schedule adoption of aforementioned Ordinance at the next regular City Council meeting.

There is no fiscal impact to the General Fund.

4. ADMINISTRATIVE ITEMS
This agenda category is for City Council consideration of a wide variety of topics related to the City's operations. Public comments regarding items in this section should be presented during "Matters from the Audience."
4A. Backflow and Cross-Connection Controls Ordinance Update; Cross-Connection Control Management Policy
— 1. Waive full reading and introduce Ordinance No. 1261, “An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Brea Amending the Brea City Code To Update Backflow and Cross-Connection Controls and Approving a CEQA Exemption Determination,” by title only; and — 2. Adopt Resolution No. 2025-033 approving a Cross-Connection Control Management Plan.

There is no fiscal impact to the General Fund.
4B. Ordinance to Amend the Brea City Code Chapter 16.08: Fireworks — 1. Waive full reading of and introduce Ordinance No. 1262, "An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Brea amending the Brea City Code to update the fireworks ban and approving a CEQA Exemption" by title only. There is a potential for revenue increase due to fines, but there are no known expenditures directly related to the amendment of this ordinance.

5. CONSENT CALENDAR
The City Council/Successor Agency approves all Consent Calendar matters with one motion unless Council/Agency or Staff requests further discussion of a particular item. Items of concern regarding Consent Calendar matters should be presented during “Matters from the Audience." 5A. April 15, 2025 Regular City Council Meeting Minutes — 1. Approve.
5B. Adopt a Resolution Establishing the City of Brea Master Employee Pay Schedule to Comply with CalPERS Regulations
— 1. Adopt Resolution No. 2025-034 establishing the updated City of Brea Master Employee Pay Schedule, confirming the pay rates/ranges for all City of Brea established positions in order to comply with CalPERS regulations. There is no fiscal impact to the General Fund. 5C. Resolution Opposing Amended Rules 1111 and 1121
— 1. Approve Resolution No. 2025-035 opposing South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) Proposed Amended Rules 1111 and 1121. There is no fiscal impact to the General Fund.
5D. Ordinance Designating Fire Hazard Severity Zones
— 1. Waive full reading of and adopt Ordinance No. 1260 "An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Brea designating fire hazard severity zones," formally accepting and implementing the updated California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE) Local Responsibility Area (LRA) maps for our jurisdiction. The adoption of the updated LRA maps will be absorbed within the existing Fire Department budget. 5E. Budget Adjustments to the City Operating and Capital Improvement Program Budgets for FY 2023-25
— 1. Adopt Resolution No. 2025-036 and 2025-037 appropriating funds to adjust the Fiscal Year 2023-25 City Operating and Capital Improvement Program Budgets. 5F. Second Amendment to the Waste Disposal Agreement with the County of Orange for Solid Waste Disposal Services
— 1. Approve a second amendment to the Waste Disposal Agreement with the County of Orange for solid waste disposal services extending the term by 12 months. As part of the amended and restated franchise agreement with Republic Services, the increased disposal costs were already incorporated into the recently approved solid waste rate increases. No additional appropriations are needed for the FY 2025-2026 Sanitation and Street Sweeping Fund (440) operating budget.
5G. Award Contract with All American Asphalt in the Amount of $2,349,866.00 for the Birch Street Phase 1A Street Improvements from N. Kraemer Boulevard to Valencia Avenue, CIP 7329 — 1. Approve the Plans and Specifications;
— 2. Receive bids;
— 3. Award Contract to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder, All American Asphalt, in the amount of $2,349,866.00; and,
— 4. Authorize the City Engineer to issue Change Orders up to a "not to exceed" amount of 10% of the Contract Price. There are sufficient funds to complete the Project construction in the approved FY 2024-25 CIP Project budget.
5H. Joint Use Agreement Between City of Brea and Southern California Edison for the SR-57 & Lambert Road Interchange Improvements, CIP 7251
— 1. Approve Joint Use Agreement with Southern California Edison. There is no fiscal impact to the General Fund.
5I. Approve Child Abuse Services Operational Agreement with University of California, Irvine — 1. Approve a three-year operational agreement with the University of California, Irvine Department of Pediatrics for child sexual abuse examinations. The cost of the contract has been incorporated into the Police Department's adopted budget. 5J. City Disbursement Registers for April 11, 2025, April 18, 2025 , and April 25, 2025 — 1. Receive and file.

6. ADMINISTRATIVE ANNOUNCEMENTS
6A. City Manager
6B. City Attorney
6C. Council Requests

7. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS
7A. Council Announcements

8. ADJOURNMENT
8A. Meeting Adjournment
Date Posted: May 1, 2025
City of Brea
City Council Regular Meeting Communication
D. FY 2025-27 Budget Workshop: Preview of Operating and Seven-Year Capital Improvement Program Budgets Meeting
Tuesday, May 6, 2025, 7:00 PM
Agenda Group
STUDY SESSION - EXECUTIVE CONFERENCE ROOM 3RD FLOOR
- 5:30 P.M. Item: 1D.

TO
Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
FROM
Kristin Griffith, City Manager

RECOMMENDATION
Review and approve the proposed recommended decision packages for inclusion within the FY 2025-27 Operating Budget scheduled for adoption on June 17, 2025; Appropriate General Fund Excess Reserves to close the General Fund budget gap for FY 2025-27 as presented in the FY 2025-27 Operating Budget Workbook; and Review and receive presentation for the City's Seven-Year Capital Improvement Program Budget scheduled for adoption on June 17, 2025.

BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION
City staff is pleased to present for the City Council’s consideration the City’s two-year Biennial Budget covering the annual periods from July 1, 2025 through June 30, 2026 and July 1, 2026 through June 30, 2027. With the guidance of City Council, this budget was developed to provide the highest level of services to our residents and business community while continuing to evaluate fiscal constraints and develop long term strategies to address projected budget shortfalls. Below are some of the long-term strategies currently being evaluated. Realizing that financial information is unknown at this time, staff will continue discussions with City Council and reintroduce any items once more definitive financial information becomes available:

Evaluation of lease agreements at the Civic & Cultural Center; Evaluation of subsidies provided to other agencies, user groups and/or events; Evaluation of oil franchise fees and cell tower lease agreements; Evaluation of market outreach to film industry;
Updates to the Brea Mall Message Board signage revenue projections; Consideration of short-term rentals and other business opportunities; and Consideration of business license tax and transient occupancy tax (TOT) updates.

The proposed General Fund budget, as summarized in this Budget Workbook, sets the financial course for the City and defines the priority of services provided to our community. It is the culmination of months of effort from City staff, City departments and City Council. The proposed budget for the coming two fiscal years includes both onetime and long-term budget considerations. A detailed list of budget considerations is provided in the section entitled, “General Fund Budget Changes” which illustrates the changes from the baseline budget presented to City Council at their Offsite Meeting on January 28, 2025 for FY 2025-27. It’s important to note that the City continues to make all debt obligation payments, address replacement capital needs and continues to provide high level of services to the community despite the temporary budget changes proposed in the budget.

Looking at the City’s major revenue sources, sales tax has drastically fluctuated downward this past fiscal year as a result of prior year misallocations, shifts in consumer spending to non-taxable purchases and uncertainty in major business sectors including General Retail and Transportation segments. Sales tax revenues is the largest revenue source for the City’s General Fund and represents approximately 40 percent of the City’s General Fund budget.

Looking ahead, staff is proposing to include sales tax projections related to new development as a result of the current expansion at the Brea Mall. New restaurants and retail storefronts are expected this coming fiscal year, and as such, additional sales tax revenue was assumed. Estimates still remain conservative, however projections can change with shifts in the economic environment related to consumer spending habits and inflationary uncertainty in the market.

Property taxes, which is the City’s second largest General Fund revenue source, also continues to maintain marginal growth as development continues within the City. Staff remains cautiously optimistic as we present the proposed FY 2025-27 budget and are closely monitoring the state of the economy as the risk of a recession continues to loom in the coming fiscal years. As more information becomes available, staff will adjust assumptions and return to City Council at a later date.

Overall, this budget workbook provides a preview of the FY 2025-26 and FY 2026-27 budgets with opportunities for comments, input, and direction from City Council. The information presented tonight is based upon staff’s objective assumptions for both revenues and expenditures on information that is known as of May 6, 2025. The following are key points to consider while reviewing the Budget Workbook which is provided as Attachment A:

City Mission Statement, Organizational Goals and City Council’s Top Priorities and Projects – The City’s mission statements and City Council’s top priorities and projects are provided as a reference and is the foundation for the City’s budget.

Fiscal Policies Statement – The City’s Fiscal Policies Statement sets the financial framework for the City’s budget.

General Fund Budget Changes – This section details the organizational efforts taken to balance the City’s General Fund budget shortfall that was previously presented at the City Council Offsite on January 28, 2025 for FY 2025-27 projections. The budget information presented at the City Council Offsite was an initial starting point of the budget development process and did not include department submittals or updated revenue projections.

Continue current service levels based upon the City's operational goals; Preserve the City's long-term fiscal health by aligning operating revenues and costs; and Maintain the City's general fund reserves in accordance with the City's fiscal policies.

It is important to stress that projections beyond fiscal year 2026-27 are NOT a budget and are used to highlight the need to prioritize the allocation of City resources. The projections are to provide an overview of the City's fiscal health based on various assumptions over the next five years, offering the City Council, departments, and residents of Brea a "snapshot" of the financial outlook beyond this budget cycle. The Five Year Projections serves as a planning tool to bring a long-term perspective to the budget process. The assumptions used in preparing the projections are detailed in this section of the workbook and are categorized by revenue and expenditure assumptions.

Lastly, it is important to note that any projected gains or losses to future CalPERS employer rate, as a result of changes in the investment market, are amortized over a 20-year horizon. There are no changes for the first two years followed by a ramp up over the next five years, and then levels off for the remaining 15 years. The CalPERS rate of return fluctuates and therefore future year rates are subject to change. The current discount rate is set at 6.8% however there is no guarantee where its value will land at fiscal year-end.

Decision Packages – Decision packages are department requests for new programs, personnel, and/or equipment. They are organized by fund and are not presented in any priority order. There is a total of 14 decision packages recommended for review and consideration. The packages presented are for City Council review and feedback, as well as a provide a preview of the needs of the upcoming two fiscal years.

Decision Packages On-Hold – Decision packages on-hold are those requests submitted as part of the budget process that are not recommended at this time due to funding availability. The recommendation is to place these requests on hold as further discussion is needed or funding becomes available. Staff may bring these requests back for consideration as funding becomes available or if the need addressed by the request is prioritized at a later date.

Fund Summaries – This section of the workbook includes the fund summaries of those funds impacted by the proposed decision packages. The fund summaries identify funding availability and include any associated costs of the proposed decision packages.

Successor Agency – The expenditure summary for the Successor Agency to the Brea Redevelopment Agency is presented in this section of the workbook.

Tonight's presentation will also provide an opportunity to review the City's proposed Seven Year Capital Improvement Program Budget which is provided as Attachment B.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED:

Kristin Griffith, City Manager
Prepared by: Alicia Brenner, Budget Manager
Concurrence: Monica Lo, Director of Administrative Services Attachments
Attachment A - 25-27 Budget Workbook Operating.pdf
Attachment B - Seven Year CIP Proposed Budget.pdf
May 6, 2025
Prepared by:

Administrative Services Department
FY 2025-27

BUDGET WORKSHOP

CITY OF BREA
CITY MANAGER’S OFFICE
May 6, 2025
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Kristin Griffith, City Manager
SUBJECT: FY 2025-26 and 2026-27 Budget Workbook Introduction City staff is pleased to present for the City Council’s consideration the City’s two-year Biennial Budget covering the annual periods from July 1, 2025 through June 30, 2026 and July 1, 2026 through June 30, 2027. With the guidance of City Council, this budget was developed to provide the highest level of services to our residents and business community while continuing to evaluate fiscal constraints and develop long term strategies to address projected budget shortfalls. Below are some of the long-term strategies currently being evaluated. Realizing that financial information is unknown at this time, staff will continue discussions with City Council and reintroduce any items once more definitive financial information becomes available:
 Evaluation of lease agreements at the Civic & Cultural Center;  Evaluation of subsidies provided to other agencies, user groups and/or events;  Evaluation of oil franchise fees and cell tower lease agreements;  Evaluation of market outreach to film industry;
 Updates to the Brea Mall Message Board signage revenue projections;  Consideration of short-term rentals and other business opportunities; and  Consideration of business license tax and transient occupancy tax (TOT) updates.

A detailed list of budget considerations is provided in the section entitled, “General Fund Budget Changes” which illustrates the changes from the baseline budget presented to City Council at their Offsite Meeting on January 28, 2025 for FY 2025-27. It’s important to note that the City continues to make all debt obligation payments, address replacement capital needs and continues to provide high level of services to the community despite the temporary budget changes proposed in the budget.
1 Looking at the City’s major revenue sources, sales tax has drastically fluctuated downward this past fiscal year as a result of prior year misallocations, shifts in consumer spending to non-taxable purchases and uncertainty in major business sectors including General Retail and Transportation segments. Sales tax revenues is the largest revenue source for the City’s General Fund and represents approximately 40 percent of the City’s General Fund budget.

Fiscal Policies Statement – The City’s Fiscal Policies Statement sets the financial framework for the City’s budget.

General Fund Five Year Projections – The Five Year Projections represent staff’s estimate, as of May 6, 2025, of where the General Fund will be for each of the next five fiscal years. The projection serves as a tool to identify financial trends, shortfalls, and issues enabling the City to proactively address them. The goal of the Five Year Projections is to assess the City's ability over the next five years to:
o Continue current service levels based upon the City's operational goals; o Preserve the City's long-term fiscal health by aligning operating revenues and costs; and o Maintain the City's general fund reserves in accordance with the City's fiscal policies. 2 It is important to stress that projections beyond fiscal year 2026-27 are NOT a budget and are used to highlight the need to prioritize the allocation of City resources. The projections are to provide an overview of the City's fiscal health based on various assumptions over the next five years, offering the City Council, departments, and residents of Brea a "snapshot" of the financial outlook beyond this budget cycle. The Five Year Projections serves as a planning tool to bring a long-term perspective to the budget process. The assumptions used in preparing the projections are detailed in this section of the workbook and are categorized by revenue and expenditure assumptions.

Successor Agency – The expenditure summary for the Successor Agency to the Brea Redevelopment Agency is presented in this section of the workbook.

The City’s proposed Seven Year Capital Improvement Program budget will be transmitted to the City Council as a separate document. Staff looks forward to reviewing and discussing the proposed FY 2025-27 Budget. If you should have any questions prior to the meeting, please do not hesitate to contact me.

3 [INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
4 CITY MISSION STATEMENT
All work performed in the organization must somehow relate to a basic policy direction as developed by the City Council. The fundamental building block upon which we base our work programs are the Council Mission Statement. A Mission Statement is a broad-based, generic policy developed by the City Council usually covering a single issue area. Mission Statement is an expression of the Council’s vision. Usually expressed as a definitive statement of purpose (“Brea will do…” “The City is committed to…”), a Mission Statement guide the development of operational goals by the various departments.

Maintain a Safe Environment for Breans
Public safety is a basic element of Brea’s quality of life. The City will continue to use education and prevention approaches as well as enforcement and appropriate maintenance of facilities to enhance people’s sense of security.

Ensure Brea Remains a Special Place
Brea’s small town atmosphere, our sense of community and our physical assets make Brea a special place. The City resolves to protect Brea’s hillside and canyon areas and foster family values, quality education, cultural understanding, a vibrant civic and cultural life, and an involved and caring citizenry.

Protect and Enhance Brea as a Balanced Community
A successful community sustains itself by ensuring a balance in physical, economic and human development. A balanced community provides residents and businesses with the infrastructure and services which fulfill the diverse expectations of the community. A balanced community will provide a variety of land uses, promote economic health, and create and retain jobs while diversifying the revenue base needed to support services and maintain a sound reserve fund. A balanced community will also ensure a diversity of affordable housing opportunities for all elements of Brea, from the young to the old.

Increase Breans’ Sense of Civic Ownership
The City commits itself to two-way communication and interaction with the community to facilitate vision building, long-range planning, and organizational excellence. These elements are necessary for the long-term success of the community.

5 2025 – 2027 OPERATIONAL GOALS
Operational Goals specifically describe the desired end result of various City programs. Operational Goals support one or more Mission Statements and begin to convert City Council policy as expressed through Mission Statements to specific program activities. The below operational goals have been reviewed by the Executive Team and recommended for City Council review. City Council typically approves these goals biennially.

One of the ongoing goals of the City Council is somewhat intangible. It involves the notion of “Quality of Life” and attention to the “little things” that make a difference to individuals or specific neighborhoods. All City Departments work to provide programs and services that will make a difference in the Quality of Life of our residents and business community. Many of the operational goals identified below directly or indirectly address these general quality of life issues.

Support Community Diversity
& Civic Involvement
Promote Environment
Sustainability & Recycling Efforts
Promote Long Term
Financial Stability
Provide Effective &
Efficient Public Services
Invest in City Infrastructure,
Facilities & Neighborhoods
Improve Employee Relations,
Retention & Attraction
Promote Economic Development
& Affordable Housing
Support Homeless Outreach
Efforts & Resource Assistance
Explore Collaborative
& Regional Partnerships
6 CITY COUNCIL TOP PRIOR ITIES AND P ROJEC TS
On January 28, 2025, the City Council and Executive Team met to review priorities and projects for the current and upcoming fiscal years. Guided by the City’s Mission Statement and Operational Goals, the following priorities and projects for fiscal years 2025-27 are outlined below in no particular order.

1. Seek opportunities to stabilize the City’s CalPERS rates

2. Continue to enhance community engagement by implementing findings from parks, recreation, senior services, and cultural arts studies and Master Plans

3. Continue development of the Tracks at Brea Trail, including enhancements throughout existing segments, as well as completion of the Western Extension

4. Continue to support efforts to reduce homelessness in Brea and throughout Orange County

5. Continue to explore sustainable fleet options for environmental responsibility

6. Implement pavement upgrades to improve streets citywide

7. Complete discussion with the County regarding the updated WISE Agreement

8. Develop strategy for Phase 2 of construction of the Arovista Park Modernization project

9. Enhance the Fire and Police Department’s emergency response by expanding resources, improving technology, and optimizing operational efficiency

10. Develop an Economic Development Strategic Plan

11. Actively pursue organization marketing opportunities to enhance community recognition, and improve employee recruitment, and employee retention

12. Evaluate the annexation of the Sphere of Influence (SOI) to support city growth and development

13. Enhance and expand traffic safety efforts: Including but not limited to community education programs on safe driving practices and e-bike safety

14. Complete and maintain the Police Department’s Integrated Crime Center (ICC)

15. Identify and pursue innovative strategies to enhance city revenue and reduce costs through operational improvements and strategic resource management 7 [INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
8 FISCAL POLICIES STATEMENT
Operating Budget Policies
 The City will adopt a balanced budget by June 30 of each biennial year. A continuing appropriations resolution must be adopted by the City Council if the budget adoption will be delayed past June 30.  An annual base Operating Budget will be developed by verifying or conservatively projecting revenues and expenditures for the current and forthcoming two fiscal years.  During the budget development process, the existing base budget will be thoroughly examined to assure removal or reduction of any services or programs that could be eliminated or reduced in cost.  Current revenues will be sufficient to support current operating expenditures.  The biennial operating budgets will provide for adequate design, construction, maintenance, and replacement of the City’s capital plan and equipment.
 The City will project its equipment replacement and maintenance needs for the next five years and will update this projection each year. From this projection a maintenance and replacement schedule will be developed and followed.
 The City will avoid budgetary and accounting procedures that balance the current budget at the expense of future budgets.
 The City will forecast its General Fund expenditures and revenues for each of the next five years and will update this forecast at least annually.
 Any revenues over expenditures from the prior fiscal year shall be transferred as follows: 95 percent to the City’s Fixed Asset Replacement Fund (FARP) and 5 percent to the City’s Other Post-Employment Benefits Fund (OPEB).
 The City will work toward and maintain one year’s amount of pension obligation costs within the City’s Section 115 Trust Account for Post-Employment Benefits. Contribution amounts by fund should be based upon a percent of annual pension obligation costs and shall include the City’s enterprise funds.

General Fund Reserve Policies
 The City will maintain General Fund contingency reserves at a level at least equal to 25% of the General Fund expenditures. Of which 10% is for an Operating Reserve to provide sufficient cash flow and 15% is for an Budget Stabilization Reserve to provide resources in the event of the following:
o Temporary or one-time decrease of revenues, such as state subventions; o Economic downturn or when one or more of the General Fund's major revenue sources decreases more than 10% while expenditure reductions are implemented;
o Natural (e.g. fire, earthquake, flood) and catastrophic disasters (e.g. civil unrest, acts of terrorism, airplane crashes).
 Whenever contingency reserves are used, the reserve shall be replenished as soon as possible. Fifty percent or more of available year-end funds may be allocated to the contingency reserves annually until the reserve is at the target of 25%. The reserves will be funded in the following priority order:
o Operating Reserve
o Budget Stabilization Reserve
 In no circumstances shall the total contingency reserve balance drop below 10% of the City's annual operating expenditures.
9 FISCAL POLICIES STATEMENT
Capital Replacement Reserve Policies
 For General Fund assets, the City will maintain a Community Center Replacement Fund (181) and a Fixed Asset Replacement Fund (182) to provide for the timely replacement of capital replacement items.  The City will strive to maintain a minimum fund balance in these capital reserve funds of at least three times the annual General Fund contribution amount. This amount will be adjusted biennially as part of the budget process.
 The annual contribution to these funds from the General Fund will generally be based on the annual use allowance which is determined based upon the estimated life of the asset and its original purchase cost as identified in the Reserve Study.
 Borrowing from these capital reserve funds to balance the General Fund budget for items not defined in the Reserve Study or for a capital replacement item requires approval by City Council ad shall include a reason for the funding decision and a funding plan for repayment. Any borrowing from these capital reserve funds must be in compliance with the City’s Reserve Fund Transparency Ordinance.  Any borrowing from these capital reserve funds not defined in the Reserve Study or for a capital replacement item shall be documented on the balance sheet as a liability.

Revenue Policies
 The City will try to maintain a diversified and stable revenue system to shelter it from short-term fluctuations in any one revenue source.
 Because revenues, especially those of the General Fund, are sensitive to both local and regional economic conditions, revenue estimates adopted by the City Council must be conservative.  The City will estimate its annual revenues by an objective, analytical process utilizing trend, judgmental and statistical analysis as appropriate.
 User fees will be adjusted annually to recover the full cost of services provided, except when the City Council determines that a subsidy from the General Fund is in the public interest.  Community Services fees will be reviewed and recommended by the appropriate City Council appointed Commission for adoption.
 One-time revenues will be used for one-time expenditures only.

Expenditure Policies
 The City will maintain a level of expenditures which will provide for the public well-being and safety of the residents of the community.
 City Council approval is required before expending General Fund or contingency reserves.  Expenditures budgeted in one fiscal year may be carried over to the next fiscal year automatically if the purpose for which the expenditure was budgeted has not been completed. Such carryovers shall not occur for more than two budget cycles without City Council approval (with the exception of PEG Fees, CASP Fee Training, Senior Center Case Management Funds, Senior Center and Olinda Museum Donations, Senior 10 FISCAL POLICIES STATEMENT
Transportation Program Overhead, Public Art Trust Account, Housing Rehabilitation Funds and Seagraves Fire Truck Maintenance). As part of the biennial budget, the City Manager shall have the authority to automatically carryover available appropriation from one fiscal year to another fiscal year for a new expenditure so long as the total appropriation per expenditure does not exceed the City Manager’s authority limit of $50,000.
 Operating expenditure budgets which have been changed solely as the result of City Council approved labor agreements need not be re-approved by the City Council.  Self-insurance reserves will be maintained at a level which, together with purchased insurance policies, adequately protect the City. The City will strive to maintain a reserve of three times its self-insurance retention.

Utility Rates and Fees
 The City will annually set fees and user charges for each enterprise fund on a “pay as you go basis” at a level that fully supports the total direct and indirect cost of the activity. Indirect costs include the cost of annual depreciation of capital assets and overhead charges.
 The City will maintain adequate reserves in each of the enterprise funds to protect these essential City programs. Urban Runoff Fund reserves, Water Fund reserves and Sewer Fund reserves shall have a minimum operating reserve equal to three months of operating expenditures and a capital reserve equal to one-year of capital expenditures.
 As required by the Water Revenue Bond Indenture, water rates must be set in an amount sufficient to meet the bond coverage tests and certified on an annual basis by an independent financial advisor.  The use of long-term debt is an acceptable financing mechanism for the construction of capital improvements to the existing system; the annual debt service must be included in the current rate structure.

Capital Improvement Budget Policies
 The City will develop a seven-year plan for capital improvement (CIP), including CIP design, development, implementation, and operating and maintenance costs.
 The City will make all capital improvements in accordance with an adopted and funded seven-year capital improvement plan.
 The City will identify the estimated costs, potential funding sources and project schedule for each capital project proposal before it is submitted to the City Council for approval.  The City will carry over all capital project appropriation balances for use in next fiscal year.  The City will use intergovernmental assistance to finance only those capital improvements that are consistent with the Capital Improvement Program and City priorities, and whose operating and maintenance costs have been included in the budget.
 The City will coordinate development of the Capital Improvement Budget with the development of the Operating Budget. All costs for internal professional services needed to implement the CIP will be included in the Operating Budget for the year the CIP is to be implemented.  Cost tracking for components of the Capital Improvement Program will be implemented and updated quarterly to ensure project completion within budget and established timelines. 11 FISCAL POLICIES STATEMENT
Short‐Term Debt Policies
 The City may use short-term debt to cover temporary or emergency cash flow shortages. All short-term borrowing will be subject to City Council approval by ordinance or resolution.  The City may issue Interfund loans rather than outside debt instruments to fund short-term cash flow needs.

Interfund loans will be permitted only if an analysis of the affected fund indicates excess funds are available and the use of these funds will not impact its current operations. The prevailing interest rate, as established by the City’s Administrative Services Department, will be paid to the lending fund.  The actual issuance of debt shall be in compliance with the City of Brea Local Debt Policy.

Long ‐Term Debt Policies
 The City will confine long-term borrowing to capital improvements that cannot be financed from the current revenues.
 Wherever possible, the City will use special assessment, revenue, or other self-supporting bonds instead of general obligation bonds.
 The City will have in place a Financing Team including bond counsel, an underwriter, and a financial advisor to assist the City throughout the year in developing and implementing its long range financial planning.  The actual issuance of debt shall be in compliance with the City of Brea Local Debt Policy.

Investment Policies
 The City Council will review and adopt annually an investment policy as recommended by the Investment Advisory Committee. The policy will be in compliance with State law. The Administrative Services Director will submit a monthly report of investments to the City Council.

Accounting, Auditing and Financial Reporting
 The City’s accounting and financial reporting systems will be maintained in conformity with generally accepted accounting as promulgated by the Government Accounting Standards Board and the Financial Accounting Standards Board.
 Full disclosure will be provided in the financial statements and bond representations.  The City will maintain not less than an “A” credit rating in the financial community.  An annual audit will be performed by an independent public accounting firm with the subsequent issue of an official Annual Comprehensive Financial Report (ACFR), including the auditor’s opinion.  The annual audit will include a report on internal control, including auditor recommendations and management responses.
 The City will endeavor to submit its ACFR to the Governmental Finance Officers Association award program to ensure that its financial reporting meets the highest standards of government accounting. 12 FISCAL POLICIES STATEMENT
Development Plan Processing
 Development process costs and related administrative expenses will be totally offset by development fees.  All future developments will be analyzed for their fiscal impact on the City. Fiscal impacts include both ongoing revenue and expenditure and capital improvements and facilities required directly or indirectly as a result of the new development. Developments will be required to either have a positive or neutral fiscal impact. Developments which are determined to have a negative fiscal impact will be required to provide nexus related fees or charges to eliminate the negative impact.

13 [INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
14 FY 2025-27 GENERAL FUND BUDGET CHANGES
On January 28, 2025, staff presented a General Fund budget shortfall of $10.6 million in Fiscal Year 2025-26 and continues in Fiscal Year 2026-27. The information presented at this meeting was an initial starting point of the budget development process and did not include department budget submittals or updated revenue projections.

The below budget changes presented are efforts to address the City’s General Fund deficit for fiscal year 2025- 26 and 2026-27. Majority of the budget efforts identified are temporary and may not be sustainable beyond the biennial budget cycle. City Council concurrence and direction is needed for staff to prepare the General Fund Operating Budget before the June 30th deadline.

Budget information provided are rounded estimates and are categorized by Revenue Changes, Transfers-In Changes, Expenditure Changes and Transfer-out Changes. Budget information items are not listed in any priority order.

No Description Comments YEAR 1
Net Savings
YEAR 2
Net Savings
Revenue Changes
1 Increased sales tax projections based upon sales
tax activity through December 31, 2024. Includes
increased projections associated to new
development
dependent on
economic
environment
$ 2,460,000 $ 2,662,000
2 Increased property tax projections to include
assumptions related to new development - - $ 983,000 $ 1,900,000 3 Increased Community Service fees for various
programs including emphasis on cost recovery
from non-residents
- - $ 560,000 $ 753,000
4 Programmed Fire Strike-Team reimbursement
revenues from Cal-OES
dependent
on Strike Team
responses
$ 150,000 $ 150,000
5 Programmed conservative revenue assumption
associated with the Brea Mall Message Board
Signage
- - $ - $ 100,000
6 Increased Indirect Overhead Contribution revenue
based upon updated Cost Allocation Plan (CAP) - - $ 290,000 $ 100,000 7 Cost recovery efforts for the City’s User Fee Study
currently underway Conservative $ 150,000 $ 200,000
8 Changes in revenues based upon updated
projections including transient occupancy tax,
business license, grants, etc.
- - $ 120,600 $ (486,467)
Revenue Changes (Sub-total) $ 4,713,600 $5,378,533
15 FY 2025-27 GENERAL FUND BUDGET CHANGES
No Description Comments YEAR 1
Net Savings
YEAR 2
Net Savings
Transfers-In Changes
9 Programmed Transfer-in from the City’s
Community Benefit and Economic Development
Fund (140)
temporary $ - $ 300,000
10 Programmed Transfer-in from the City’s Public
Safety Augmentation Fund (172) to support public
safety related operating needs
temporary $ 250,000 $ 500,000
11 Programmed Increased Transfer-in from the City’s
Supplemental Law Enforcement Services Fund
(173)
temporary $ 80,000 $ 80,000
12 Programmed Transfer-in from the City’s Golf
Course Fund (465) temporary $ 1,300,000 $ 1,300,000
Transfer-In Changes (Sub-total) $ 1,630,000 $ 2,180,000 TOTAL REVENUE CHANGES $ 6,343,600 $ 7,558,533
No Description Comments YEAR 1
Net Savings
YEAR 2
Net Savings
Expenditure Changes
13 PERSONNEL - Freeze full-time vacant Senior
Management Analyst Position in City Manager’s
Office
temporary $ 144,000 $ 147,000
14 PERSONNEL - Eliminate full-time vacant Software
Developer Position in the City’s Information
Technology Division and use as-needed consultant
services
- - $ 80,000 $ 80,000
15 PERSONNEL - Underfill certain vacant full-time
positions in the Administrative Services
Department including the Senior Management
Analyst Position, Senior Accountant Position and
the Deputy Administrative Services Director
position
temporary $ 120,000 $ 120,000
16 PERSONNEL - Freeze full-time vacant Detective
Sergeant Position for one year temporary $ 300,000 $ -
16 FY 2025-27 GENERAL FUND BUDGET CHANGES
No Description Comments YEAR 1
Net Savings
YEAR 2
Net Savings
Expenditure Changes (continued)
17 PERSONNEL - Freeze full-time vacant Fire Engineer
Position for one year and backfill with overtime temporary $ 15,000 $ - 18 PERSONNEL - Freeze full-time vacant Firefighter
Position and backfill with overtime temporary $ 42,000 $ 45,000 19 PERSONNEL - Freeze two full-time vacant
Combination Inspector Positions and utilize asneeded consultant services temporary $ 120, 000 $ 127, 000
20 PERSONNEL – Continue to seek grant
opportunities to fund Homeless Outreach Liaison
position in the Brea Resource Center
temporary $ - $ 120,000
21 PERSONNEL - Salary and operating costs from the
Integrated Crime Center (ICC). Retail Theft Grant
expires on December 31, 2026
- - $ - $ (384,965)
22 PERSONNEL - Freeze part-time Administrative
Intern Position in Community Development temporary $ 20,000 $ 20,000 23 PERSONNEL - Freeze two part-time Police Cadet
positions in Police Services temporary $ 52,000 $ 52,000 24 PERSONNEL – Reduce Police Overtime - - $ 300,000 $ 300,000 25 PERSONNEL - Staffing cost increases primarily
attributed to PERS costs distributed among current
full-time salaries and overtime costs for public
safety
- - $ (643,848) $ (2,002,499)
26 OPERATING - Reduce BreaLine printing and mailing
services. Alternatives may include a postcard
mailing to encourage online registration
- - $ 70,000 $ 70,000
27 OPERATING - Reduce and defer employee training,
membership and travel expenses across the
organization
temporary $ 147,000 $ 142,000
17 FY 2025-27 GENERAL FUND BUDGET CHANGES
No Description Comments YEAR 1
Net Savings
YEAR 2
Net Savings
Expenditure Changes (continued)
28 OPERATING - Reduce Police Explorer Program temporary $ 10,000 $ 10,000 29 OPERATING - Reduce Police Firearms Training to
four times per year including overtime temporary $ 65,000 $ 65,000 30 OPERATING - Fund firefighter turnout replacement
from the City’s Public Safety Augmentation Fund
(172)
- - $ 33,000 $ 33,000
31 OPERATING - Reduce Public Works costs including
street maintenance costs, downtown maintenance
costs and Sports Park maintenance costs
temporary $ 77,000 $ 102,000
32 OPERATING - Reduce asphalt repair costs to
address on an as-needed basis temporary $ 50,000 $ 75,000 33 OPERATING - Reduce park and landscape watering
at certain locations temporary $ 200,000 $ 200,000
34 OPERATING - Extend certain vehicle and
equipment replacement cycle by one year temporary $ 250,000 $ - 35 OPERATING - True-up of City’s Risk Management
Fund. Reduces general liability charges to
departments based upon excess reserves.
- -
Offsets rising
insurance
premiums
Offsets rising
insurance
premiums
36 OPERATING – Reduce banking charges related to
credit card processing. Implementation of
convenience fee
- - $ 161,500 $ 167,000
37 OPERATING – Other miscellaneous changes in
department operating costs temporary $ 173,452 $ (613,322) Expenditure Changes (Sub-total) $ 1,666,104 $(1,252,786) 18 FY 2025-27 GENERAL FUND BUDGET CHANGES
No Description Comments YEAR 1
Net Savings
YEAR 2
Net Savings
Transfers- Out Changes
38 Reduced assumed transfer-out to the Paramedic
Services Fund (174) as a result of increased
ambulance billing revenue
- - $ 506,099 $ 204,364
39 Suspend Transfer-out to the City’s Brea
Community Center Replacement Fund (181) for
two years
temporary $ 167,000 $ 167,000
40 Suspend Transfer-out to the City’s Fixed Asset
Replacement Program (182) temporary $ 1,300,000 $ 1,300,000 41 Program Transfer-out to the Capital Mitigation
Fund (560) related to bond refinancing savings - - $ (56,000) $ (56,000) Transfers-Out Changes (Sub-total) $ 1,917,099 $ 1,615,364 TOTAL EXPENDITURE CHANGES $ 3,583,203 $ 362,578
CHANGE IN REVENUES OVER EXPENDITURES $ 9,926,803 $ 7,921,111 19 [INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
20 GENERAL FUND: Five Year Projection Assumptions
The below projection serves as a tool to identify financial trends, shortfalls, and issues so that the City can proactively address them. The goal of the Five-Year Projections is to assess the City’s ability over the next five years to: Continue current service levels based upon the City’s operational goals; Preserve the City’s long-term fiscal health by aligning operating revenues and costs and; Maintain the City’s general fund reserves based upon the City’s fiscal policies. It is important to stress that the projections beyond FY 2025-27 is not a budget. It does not make expenditure decisions but rather highlights the need to prioritize the allocation of City resources. The purpose of the projection is to provide an overview of the City’s fiscal health based on various assumptions and provide the City Council, departments and residents of Brea a “snapshot” of the City’s financial outlook beyond this two-year budget cycle.

ASSUMPTIONS (FISCAL YEARS 2025-27)
Revenues
 Maintains General Fund reserves above the 25% reserve requirement  Total average revenue growth 2.5% (exclusive of one-time payment of $6.5 million from the County for the Olinda Landfill Host Fee negotiation efforts and transfers-in)  Sales tax average revenue growth 5.0% (includes increased revenues due to development)  Property tax revenue growth 4.0% (includes increased revenues due to new valuation)  Includes one-time transfers-in from other City funds including the following:
o $300,000 from the Community Benefit and Economic Development Fund (140) o $750,000 from the Public Safety Augmentation Fund (172); and o $2,600,00 million from the City’s Golf Course Fund (465)  Trues-up General Liability and Worker’s Compensation rates based upon current reserve policy utilizing excess reserves
 Includes ongoing $100,000 revenue from Brea Mall Message Board signage starting in Year 2  Includes revenues associated the City’s current User Fee Study currently underway Expenditures
 Total average operational growth of 3.3%
 Defers contribution to the City’s Brea Community Center Fund (181) and City’s Fixed Asset Replacement Fund (182)
 Includes CalPERS retirement rate assumptions based upon the most recent actuarial reports  Includes freezing and underfilling several positions to realize temporary budget savings  Reduces organization-wide operating costs including training & meeting expenses, bank charges, Brealine printing and mailing services, asphalt repair services, reduction in watering at certain park and/or landscape areas and reduces program costs for certain City services.  Extends vehicle replacement cycle for certain vehicles to realize temporary budget savings in Year 1
 Transitions costs for the Integrated Crime Center (ICC) to the City’s General Fund as result of the current Retail Theft Grant expiring on December 31, 2026 21 GENERAL FUND: Five Year Projection Assumptions
ASSUMPTIONS (FISCAL YEARS 2027-30)
Revenues
 Total average revenue growth 1.4%
 Sales tax average revenue growth 1.7%
 Property tax revenue growth 2.0%
 Includes one-time transfers-in from other City funds including $300,000 from the Community Benefit and Economic Development Fund (140), $750,000 from the Public Safety Augmentation Fund (172) and $2.6 million from the City’s Golf Course Fund (465)  Includes ongoing $100,000 revenue from Brea Mall Message Board signage  Includes reduced development activity as result of development projections Expenditures
 Total average operational growth of 4.6%
 Reinstates contribution to the City’s Brea Community Center Fund (181) and City’s Fixed Asset Replacement Fund (182)
 Increases personnel and operational costs as result of temporary budget savings realized in Year 1 and Year 2
 Includes CalPERS retirement rate assumptions based upon the most recent actuarial reports  Includes full year cost associated with the Integrated Crime Center (ICC) 22 GENERAL FUND: Five Year Projection Assumptions
* Assumes FY 2027-28 through FY 2029-30 beginning balance to be resolved Year End Requested Requested
Actuals Estimate Budget Budget Projected Projected Projected FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27 FY 2027-28* FY 2028-29* FY 2029-30* Available Beginning Fund Balance 12,818,835 $ 683,788 $ 2,788,339 $ 3,997,142 $ - $ - $ - $ Revenues 65,380,752 73,661,259 69,454,286 70,745,631 71,710,417 72,620,147 73,745,664 Carryovers From Reserves 1,910,550 8,237,599 - - - - -
Transfers In 1,231,895 795,088 2,180,000 2,730,000 550,000 550,000 550,000 Total Revenues 68,523,197 82,693,946 71,634,286 73,475,631 72,260,417 73,170,147 74,295,664 Expenditures 64,909,140 69,358,277 70,234,688 74,031,326 80,616,103 83,164,830 84,657,892 Carryovers 8,237,599 - - - - - -
Transfers-Out 2,986,234 9,126,233 2,096,001 2,401,495 2,138,384 2,346,596 2,559,214 BCC Fund (181) 167,000 167,000 - - 167,000 167,000 167,000 Fixed Asset Replacement Fund (182) 1,100,000 1,300,000 - - 1,300,000 1,300,000 1,300,000 Total Expenditures 77,399,973 79,951,510 72,330,689 76,432,821 84,221,487 86,978,426 88,684,106 Revenue over Expenditures (8,876,776) 2,742,436 (696,403) (2,957,190) (11,961,070) (13,808,279) (14,388,442) Use of Excess Reserves 8,876,776 - 2,788,339 3,997,142 - - - Revised Revenue over Expenditures - 2,742,436 2,091,936 1,039,952 (11,961,070) (13,808,279) (14,388,442) Transfer to/from Reserves (12,135,046) (637,885) (883,133) (5,022,675) (1,947,167) (689,235) (426,420)Total Available Ending Fund Balance 683,788 $ 2,788,339 $ 3,997,142 $ 14,419 $ (13,908,237) $ (14,497,514) $ (14,814,862) $ Required Reserves
Operating Reserve 10% 7,739,997 7,995,151 7,233,069 7,643,282 8,422,149 8,697,843 8,868,411 Budget Stabilization Reserve 15% 11,609,996 11,992,727 10,849,603 11,464,923 12,633,223 13,046,764 13,302,616 Total Reserves 19,349,993 19,987,878 18,082,672 19,108,205 21,055,372 21,744,607 22,171,027Total General Fund Reserve as a % of Total Expenditures 25% 25% 25% 25% 8% 8% 8%
23 [INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
24 DECISION PACKAGE SUMMARY
Decision packages are requested for new programs, new personnel, and/or new equipment. In many instances, requests for new equipment are actually the identification of capital items that need replacement or major repair. The following is a summary of decision package requests for FY 2025-27 that were reviewed by the Budget Team and are recommended for review and approval by the City Council.

The summary is arranged by Fund and each decision package request appears within each Fund group randomly by the submitting department; not in priority order. The cost of each decision package reflects the net cost for FY 2025-27 after taking into consideration any expenditure or revenue offsets that may be possible. If a decision package has an ongoing cost beyond FY 2025-27, it is noted in the decision package title for reference purposes.

RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL
Year 1 Year 2
FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27
Net Cost Net Cost Page
COMMUNITY BENEFIT AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FUND (140)
Community Development Department
Purchase of Placer.ai Software for Two Years (one-time cost) $ 47,000 $ - 31 FUND TOTAL $ 47,000 $ -
PUBLIC SAFETY AUGMENTATION FUND (172)
Fire Services Department
Purchase AutoPulse NXT Resuscitation $ - $ 92,000 35
System (one-time cost)
Purchase Bendix King Radios (one-time cost) $ 70,405 $ - 37 Provide Plymovent Exhaust Upgrades at Fire $ 70,000 $ - 39 Stations 1, 2 & 3 (one-time cost)
Purchase of Fire Turnouts (one-time cost) $ 83,000 $ 40,000 41 Purchase Tablet Command’s Mobile Incident $ 18,000 $ 5,000 43 Management Platform (ongoing cost is $5,000)
25 DECISION PACKAGE SUMMARY

RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL
Year 1 Year 2
FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27
Net Cost Net Cost Page
Fire Services Department (Continued)
Upgrade Fire Station Alerting System for Fire $ 72,183 $ - 45 Station 2 & 3 (one-time cost)
Purchase Five (5) Cardiac Monitors (one-time cost) $ 239,859 $ - 47 FUND TOTAL $ 553,477 $ 137,000
COMMUNITY CENTER REPLACEMENT FUND (181)
Community Services Department
Brea Community Center Equipment and $ 140,000 $ 145,000 51 Facility Improvements (one-time cost)
FUND TOTAL $ 140,000 $ 145,000
FIXED ASSET REPLACEMENT FUND (182)
Community Services Department
Curtis Theatre Facility Improvements $ 30,000 $ 175,000 55 (3 Year Plan) (one-time cost)
FUND TOTAL $ 30,000 $ 175,000
WATER UTILITY FUND (420)
Public Works Department
Addition of one Full-time Water Quality Specialist $ 185,374 $ 155,187 59 Position (ongoing cost is $155,187)
FUND TOTAL $ 185,374 $ 155,187
26 DECISION PACKAGE SUMMARY

RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL
Year 1 Year 2
FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27
Net Cost Net Cost Page
EXTERNAL IT SERVICES FUND (460)
Administrative Services Department
Replace Network Switches and Network Access $ 393,003 $ - 63 Control System (one-time cost)
FUND TOTAL $ 393,003 $ -
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY FUND (475)
Administrative Services Department
Replace Citywide Desktop, Mobile Computer $ 1,183,385 $ - 67 and Peripherals (one-time cost)
FUND TOTAL $ 1,183,385 $ -
FIRE IMPACT FEES FUND (542)
Fire Services Department
Purchase of Equipment and Tools for two $ 400,000 $ - 71 Type 1 Fire Engines (one-time cost)
FUND TOTAL $ 400,000 $ -
27 [INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
28 Community Benefit and
Economic Development Fund (140)
29 30
FY 2025-27 DECISION PACKAGE
Fiscal Year Request: 2025-26
Department: Community Development
Division: Economic Development
Request: Purchase of Placer.ai Software for Two Years
Recommendation:

Appropriate $47,000 in the Fiscal Year 2025-27 operating budget for a two-year purchase of Placer.ai Software; and authorize the City to enter into an agreement with Placer Labs Inc. as the selected vendor.

Background/Discussion:

The Economic Development Division (“Division”) regularly seeks methods and strategies to enhance its economic development efforts which, in turn, benefit the local economy and keep the community vibrant. In order to do so, the Division recommends the purchase of the Placer.ai software platform (“Placer.ai”) to provide staff with critical market insights and foot-traffic analysis. Placer.ai is an insightful intelligence platform that empowers City governments to make data-driven decisions to enhance economic development efforts. This cutting-edge platform provides robust, anonymized data from mobile devices regarding foot traffic, consumer behavior, and visitor demographics, enabling municipalities to make data-driven decisions to support local businesses, attract investment, and foster sustainable economic growth. By leveraging this intelligence, City staff could better understand the economic dynamics of the community and take proactive steps to stimulate development, with the goal of creating various economic benefits to the City.

One of the key benefits of Placer.ai is its ability to provide insightful data to understand sales tax leakage and gap analysis in real-time. Sales tax leakage occurs when residents of a community spend money outside their local jurisdiction, leading to a loss of potential sales tax revenue for the City. This occurrence is often a result of gaps in local retail offerings, which force residents to shop elsewhere. For the Economic Development Division, understanding and addressing sales tax leakage by using real-time and historical foot traffic data provided by Placer.ai would help staff identify opportunities to attract businesses that align with unmet local demand.

Reports can also indicate residents’ top locations outside the City’s boundaries to patron, showing other desired places to shop or dine outside of Brea. By studying this leakage, the City could better understand how to strengthen its local economy, boost revenue streams, and enhance the overall quality of life for residents by attracting these or similar retailers, reducing the need to shop outside the community. This, in turn, aims not only benefit Brea residents, but to also keep sales tax dollars in the City and the local economy strong.

The Economic Development Division could further benefit from utilizing real-time and historical foot traffic analytics provided by Placer.ai. In addition to providing data that informs sales tax leakage, real-time and historical foot traffic information could be used to identify popular commercial districts, underutilized areas, and emerging trends in visitor behavior. For example, by analyzing foot traffic patterns, the Division would be able to determine the best locations for new retail developments, pedestrian-friendly infrastructure, or public events that drive engagement and revenue. These insights also allow staff to offer valuable information to local business owners or potential developers or investors, showcasing the economic potential of specific sites. Its applications extend to retail recruitment, tourism promotion, commercial revitalization, zoning, and planning, making it a valuable tool for strategic and economic development. Additionally, the data accessible would not 31 FY 2025-27 DECISION PACKAGE
be limited to Brea only; it could be used to gauge popularity of businesses in other cities, as well as estimating business revenue projections.

Placer.ai could be used to assist the City’s understanding of their tourism industry, event attendance, and COVID-19 recovery. Because the software can show trips made in and around the City, it can indicate who from outside of Brea is coming to the City, indicating top destinations and ones less frequented by tourists. It can also indicate how many people attended any event in Brea, along with corresponding metrics on the patronage of surrounding local businesses around that time, including hotel stays. Also, historical user data can be gathered over time, indicating pre-and-post COVID-19 visitation habits and trips to inform business recovery.

Additionally, Placer.ai can be used to inform how improvements in streets, parks, and open spaces benefit the community in order to assess return-on-investment (ROI). The software is able to indicate visitation metrics before and after a public project is implemented, such as a street or park improvement. When evaluating whether or not to pursue a new improvement, staff could analyze the metrics from similar improvements completed in other jurisdictions in order to forecast potential growth that could occur in Brea.

In today’s fast-evolving economic landscape, tools like Placer.ai enable municipalities to remain competitive and adaptive. Placer.ai delivers useful insights into the dynamics of economic activity, providing the tools necessary to make informed, strategic decisions to enhance the local economy. By integrating Placer.ai into its economic development toolkit, the City can foster growth, retain and attract investments, and better serve its residents and businesses. Purchasing Placer.ai can position the City as a forward-thinking, data-driven municipality committed to sustainable economic development.

Over 1500 civic organizations use Placer.ai. Cities that have benefitted from Placer.ai include: the Cities of Tustin; Huntington Beach; Westminster; Rancho Cucamonga; Ontario; Eastvale; Corona; Fontana; Vista; Napa; West Hollywood; Santa Fe Springs; Montebello; South El Monte; Gilroy; Tehachapi; San Francisco in California, as well as Atlanta, Georgia; Phoenix, Arizona; Seattle, Washington; Denver, Colorado; Washington, D.C.; Miami, Florida; Arlington, Virginia; Yuma, Arizona; Reno, Nevada; La Vernia, Texas; Aurora, Missouri; Steamboat Springs, Colorado; Evanston, Illinois; St. Charles, Illinois; and more.

This decision package was reviewed by the SPOT Committee and was recommended for consideration by the City Council. The purchase of the software would be for a two (2) year term, for a total of $47,000, with the option to renew the agreement annually thereafter. Funding is recommended from the City’s Community Benefit and Economic Development Fund (140) and there is no General Fund impact for these two years.

FY 2025-26 Fiscal Impact
Fund/Dept/Program No 1X Ongoing Total
Salary/Benefits $ - $ - $ -
Services/Supplies 140 32 3214 4249 - 47,000 47,000
Capital Outlay - - -
Subtotal $ - $ 47,000 $ 47,000
Offset - - -
Total $ - $ 47,000 $ 47,000
32 Public Safety
Augmentation Fund (172)
33 34
FY 2025-27 DECISION PACKAGE
Fiscal Year Request: 2026-27
Department: Fire Services
Division: Paramedic Services
Request: Purchase AutoPulse NXT Resuscitation System
Recommendation:

Appropriate $92,000 into the Fiscal Year 2025-27 operating budget for the procurement of four (4) AutoPulse NXT Resuscitation Systems to replace existing end-of-life units; and Authorize the Purchasing Agent to issue a purchase order with Zoll Medical Corporation as the selected vendor.

Background/Discussion:

The City currently uses AutoPulse Model 100 Resuscitation System units that were introduced in 2001. In 2016, the City purchased four (4) devices that are now approaching end-of-service status, with the manufacturer discontinuing support. To maintain our critical life-saving capabilities and decrease potential equipment failure without manufacturer support, we must transition to the next-generation AutoPulse NXT Resuscitation System, released by Zoll Medical Corporation. in early 2023.

The AutoPulse NXT system offers significant improvements over the current model such as expanded patient compatibility (up to 400 lbs. and chest circumference 30-56 inches), dual control panels for better operational efficiency, an enhanced battery management system, and an improved band attachment mechanism. This system provides operational benefits the City of Brea’s Fire Department by maintains consistent, high-quality CPR during extended resuscitation efforts, reduces provider fatigue and increases staff efficiency, improves patient outcomes through consistent, automated compressions, enables better resource allocation during emergency responses, and provides safer working conditions for staff.

AutoPulse NXT devices can be placed into service as soon as they arrive. No training is needed, all staff are familiar with this device as it was purchased for the Ambulances put into service in January 2025. This upgrade is essential for maintaining our emergency medical capabilities, ensuring patient safety, and providing highquality patient care across the city. The enhanced features of the NXT model will improve our ability to serve a broader patient population while providing better protection for our staff during lifesaving procedures.

Zoll Medical Corporation is the selected vendor for this purchase as the sole provider of this specialized medical equipment which is compatible with other monitors in use by the Fire Department, and offers warranty coverage direct from the manufacturer. The total requested amount is $92,000, based on a unit cost of $23,000 per device, for a total of four (4) units.

Funding recommended from the Public Safety Augmentation Fund (172) which may be used for public safety requests. There is no General Fund impact.
35 FY 2025-27 DECISION PACKAGE
FY 2026-27 Fiscal Impact
Fund/Dept/Program No 1X Ongoing Total
Salary/Benefits $ - $ - $ -
Services/Supplies - - -
Capital Outlay 172 22 2222 4639 92,000 - 92,000
Subtotal $ 92,000 $ - $ 92,000
Offset - - -
Total $ 92,000 $ - $ 92,000
36 FY 2025-27 DECISION PACKAGE
Fiscal Year Request: 2025-26
Department: Fire Services
Division: Fire Operations
Request: Purchase Bendix King Radios
Recommendation:

Appropriate $70,405 into the Fiscal Year 2025-27 operating budget for the procurement of 12 Bendix King BKR multi-band portable radios for the Fire Services Department; and Authorize the Purchasing Agent to issue a purchase order with Bendix King Radios as the selected vendor.

Background/Discussion:

The current Brea Fire owned radios utilized in multi-discipline multi-agency wildfire responses are Bendix King (BK) radios. Our currently owned radios are over 25 years old with antiquated technology. The radios are very heavy and oversized and not reliable due to age and old technology. Using equipment that is decades old puts our firefighter’s safety at risk. The new radios we are requesting to purchase are the latest in communication technology and are capable of making and receiving both digital and analog signals and are compatible with a variety of different bands.

The manufacturer of our current radios has discontinued the model, and replacement parts are no longer available, rendering these radios increasingly unreliable and unserviceable.

Without functional, up-to-date radios, our ability to communicate effectively during wildland fire incidents is severely compromised. Communication breakdowns can lead to delayed response times, increased safety risks for personnel, and diminished coordination with mutual aid resources.

The acquisition of 12 Bendix King BKR multi-band portable radios is essential to ensure seamless, reliable communication during firefighting operations. These radios offer advanced multi-band capabilities, compatibility with modern communication systems, and durability required for wildland firefighting conditions.

The investment will enable us to communicate effectively with local, regional, and statewide fire resources, enhance firefighter safety by maintaining reliable communication channels, and will improve coordination and efficiency during emergency response operations. Effective communication is the backbone of firefighting operations, particularly during wildland fires that often involve multi-agency coordination, dynamic fire conditions, firefighter safety, and Incident Command System (ICS) communication.

The total cost for 12 Bendix King BKR multi-band portable radios is approximately $70,405. Funding recommended from the Public Safety Augmentation Fund (172) which is eligible for public safety requests.

There is no General Fund impact.
37 FY 2025-27 DECISION PACKAGE
FY 2025-26 Fiscal Impact
Fund/Dept/Program No 1X Ongoing Total
Salary/Benefits $ - $ - $ -
Services/Supplies - - -
Capital Outlay 172 22 2221 4639 70,405 - 70,405
Subtotal $ 70,405 $ - $ 70,405
Offset - - -
Total $ 70,405 $ - $ 70,405
38 FY 2025-27 DECISION PACKAGE
Fiscal Year Request: 2025-26
Department: Fire Services
Division: Building and Apparatus
Request: Provide Plymovent Exhaust Upgrades at Fire stations 1, 2 & 3 Recommendation:

Appropriate $70,000 into the Fiscal Year 2025-27 operating budget for the upgrade of the Plymovent exhaust system at Fire Stations 1, 2 & 3; and authorize the City to enter into agreement with Plymovent for the installation of the system.

Background/Discussion:

The Brea Fire Department is requesting funding in the amount of $70,000 to upgrade the Plymovent exhaust systems at Fire Stations 1, 2, and 3. These upgrades are needed to accommodate Brea’s ambulance vehicles and to ensure compatibility with the additional apparatus that are currently on order. The Plymovent system plays a critical role in reducing firefighter exposure to diesel exhaust, a known carcinogen, by effectively capturing and removing harmful emissions from the apparatus bay. Firefighter occupational cancer remains one of the leading health concerns in the fire service, with studies showing that firefighters are 9% more likely to develop cancer and 14% more likely to die from cancer compared to the general population. Long-term exposure to diesel exhaust, benzene, formaldehyde, and other carcinogens emitted from fire apparatus has been directly linked to increased rates of lung cancer, mesothelioma, and other respiratory diseases. Upgrading the Plymovent system will enhance our ability to mitigate these risks by ensuring a safer working environment for our personnel, particularly as we expand our fleet. By proactively addressing this issue, we align with national best practices and National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 1500 safety standards, reinforcing our commitment to firefighter health and safety. The $70,000 investment in these upgrades will directly contribute to reducing occupational cancer risks, improving air quality in our fire stations, and ensuring the longevity of our workforce.

The total one-time cost associated with the installation and upgrade of the Plymovent exhaust system is approximately $70,000. Funding is recommended from the Public Safety Augmentation Fund (172) which is eligible for public safety requests. There is no General Fund impact.

FY 2025-26 Fiscal Impact
Fund/Dept/Program No 1X Ongoing Total
Salary/Benefits $ - $ - $ -
Services/Supplies - - -
Capital Outlay 172 22 2223 4639 70,000 - 70,000
Subtotal $ 70,000 $ - $ 70,000
Offset - - -
Total $ 70,000 $ - $ 70,000
39 [INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
40 FY 2025-27 DECISION PACKAGE
Fiscal Year Request: 2025-27
Department: Fire Services
Division: Fire Operations
Request: Purchase of Fire Turnouts
Recommendation:

Appropriate $123,000 into the Fiscal Year 2025-27 operating budget for the purchase of 20 full sets of turnouts in Year 1 and 10 full sets in Year 2; and Authorize the Purchasing Agent to issue a purchase order with AllStar Fire Equipment as the selected vendor.

Background/Discussion:

In compliance with National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) standard 1851, firefighter turnouts shall be retired no more than 10 years from the date manufactured. The standard provides specification for mandatory features of the turnouts, which are present in the LION V Force model. In accordance with the same standard, an assessment of the department’s operational needs determined each firefighter should be issued two sets of turnouts. These turnouts are maintained on a five-year replacement cycle to ensure that no firefighter is operating with expired or non-compliant gear. In FY 2022-23, the Brea Fire Department had an influx of new hires and purchased several sets of turnouts that were not accounted for in the budget. This pushed the replacement rotation behind one (1) year. During this time, firefighters were outfitted from reserve supply, which are not considered as part of the replacement schedule. Staff is requesting to purchase 20 full sets of turnouts to be back on track with the mandatory rotation as outlined by the NFPA.

The turnouts requested will be purchased sole-source from AllStar Fire Equipment (Allstar), the exclusive distributor of LION brand NFPA compliant turnouts to municipal fire agencies in California and Hawaii. Allstar has a long-standing partnership with LION and maintains significant inventory and statewide professional sales support. LION provides state-of-the-art ergonomics in its Janesville VForce turnouts and incorporates advanced features designed to respond to the needs of the fire service, with focus on metabolic stress reduction, durability, mobility and comfort.

Funding is recommended from the Public Safety Augmentation Fund (172) which is eligible for public safety requests. Staff also recommend that all future turnout costs be funded from this source and therefore would not have a General Fund impact.

FY 2025-27 Fiscal Impact
Fund/Dept/Program No 1X Ongoing Total
Salary/Benefits $ - $ - $ -
Services/Supplies 172 22 2221 4311 83,000 40,000 123,000 Capital Outlay - - -
Subtotal $ 83,000 $ 40,000 $ 123,000
Offset - - -
Total $ 83,000 $ 40,000 $ 123,000
41 [INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
42 FY 2025-27 DECISION PACKAGE
Fiscal Year Request: 2025-26
Department: Fire Services
Division: Fire Operations
Request: Purchase Tablet Command’s Mobile Incident Management Platform Recommendation:

Appropriate $23,000 into the Fiscal Year 2025-27 operating budget for the purchase of Tablet Command’s mobile incident management platform; and Authorize the Purchasing Agent to issue a purchase order with Tablet Command Inc., as the selected vendor.

Background/Discussion:

The Fire Department currently utilizes Panasonic Toughbooks to access critical information and facilitate communication between firefighters, dispatch, and other emergency responders during emergency/incident responses. Although this platform is currently being utilized by the City, the Department is requesting to transition from using Panasonic Toughbooks to Tablet Command for incident response due to Tablet Command's intuitive interface, real-time access to Computer-Aided Dispatch (CAD) data, and focus on enhanced situational awareness, accountability, and scene safety.

Tablet Command is a mobile incident management platform designed to improve operational efficiency, resource tracking, and communication for the Fire Department and other city departments. Beyond its incident management capabilities, it offers a significant cost-saving opportunity by replacing expensive Panasonic Toughbooks with iPads for Mobile Data Terminals (MDT), which cost $500-$1,000 compared to $2,500-$4,000 per Toughbook. This platform enables real-time resource tracking, task assignments, and interdepartmental coordination. It is highly scalable and adaptable, benefiting not just the Fire Department but also Information Technology (IT), Public Works, Police, Emergency Management, and Community Services. Departments can use it to manage events, streamline disaster recovery, improve infrastructure responses, and conduct efficient postincident reviews. This investment will enhance city operations, reduce costs, and modernize how departments serve the community.

The estimated cost of implementing Tablet Command city-wide is approximately $18,000, with formal pricing expected soon. Ongoing costs are estimated to be approximately $5,000 per fiscal year. Funding is recommended from the City’s Public Safety Augmentation Fund (172) and there is no General Fund impact.

FY 2025-26 Fiscal Impact
Fund/Dept/Program No 1X Ongoing Total
Salary/Benefits $ - $ - $ -
Services/Supplies 172 22 2221 4321 18,000 5,000 23,000
Capital Outlay - - -
Subtotal $ 18,000 $ 5,000 $ 23,000
Offset - - -
Total $ 18,000 $ 5,000 $ 23,000
43 [INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
44 FY 2025-27 DECISION PACKAGE
Fiscal Year Request: 2025-26
Department: Fire Services
Division: Fire Operations
Request: Upgrade Fire Station Alerting System for Fire Station 2 & 3 Recommendation:

Appropriate $72,184 into the Fiscal Year 2025-27 operating budget for the installation of Fire alerting system at Fire Station 2 & 3; and Authorize the City to enter into an agreement with WestNet, LLC, as the selected vendor.

Background/Discussion:

In 2021, the WestNet Station Alerting System was installed at Fire Station 1 and Fire Station 4 to modernize and improve the City’s emergency response capabilities. This system was selected for its ability to provide 24/7 efficient and reliable dispatch alerting for fire apparatus and ambulances. Effective and timely dispatching is critical for Fire and Emergency Medical Services (EMS) operations. The WestNet Station Alerting System is designed to enhance response times, reduce stress on personnel, and ensure precise communication of dispatch information.

Currently, Fire Stations 2 and 3 lack the full implementation of this system, creating a gap in the consistency of dispatch alerting across the department. Without the WestNet system, these stations continue to rely on outdated or manual alerting methods that can lead to delayed response times and operational inefficiencies.

The current systems at these stations do not support zoned alerting, which means all personnel are disrupted regardless of whether they are assigned to the incident. The current system also lacks integration with dispatch, which can delay or complicate communication during emergencies.

The WestNet Station Alerting System offers several benefits that address these challenges. Its zoned alerting and prioritization features minimize unnecessary noise and improve the work environment for on-duty crews across all stations, while also enabling faster and more accurate dispatch alerting to support quicker mobilization of Fire and EMS units. Additionally, installation of the WestNet Station Alerting System at Fire Stations 2 and 3 aligns with the systems already in place at other stations.

The completion of the WestNet Station Alerting System installation at Fire Station 2 and Fire Station 3 is essential to modernizing the dispatch alerting process, ensuring consistent service levels across all stations, and enhancing overall operational efficiency. Approving the installation of this alerting system will address critical gaps in our alerting infrastructure and support the department's commitment to providing the highest level of service to the community. The department is requesting authorization to utilize WestNet, LLC, as it is they are the current provider for the alert system in place at Fire Stations 1 and 4 and will allow for easy installation, seamless integration, and a smooth transition for staff who are already familiar with its operation and features.

The total cost for the installation of the WestNet Station Alerting System at Fire Station 2 and Fire Station 3 is $72,184. This amount includes the cost of equipment, installation, and integration with existing systems.

Funding is recommended from the Public Safety Augmentation Fund (172) which may be used for public safety requests. There is no General Fund impact.
45 FY 2025-27 DECISION PACKAGE
FY 2025-26 Fiscal Impact
Fund/Dept/Program No 1X Ongoing Total
Salary/Benefits $ - $ - $ -
Services/Supplies - - -
Capital Outlay 172 22 2221 4639 72,184 - 72,184
Subtotal $ 72,184 $ - $ 72,184
Offset - - -
Total $ 72,184 $ - $ 72,184
46 FY 2025-27 DECISION PACKAGE
Fiscal Year Request: 2025-26
Department: Fire Services
Division: Paramedic Services
Request: Purchase Five (5) Cardiac Monitors
Recommendation:

Appropriate $239,860 into the Fiscal Year 2025-27 operating budget for the purchase of five (5) Zoll X Series Defibrillator/Monitors for the Fire Services Department; and Authorize the Purchasing Agent to issue a purchase order with Zoll Medical Corporation as the selected vendor.

Background/Discussion:

The proposed purchase will replace existing cardiac monitors that are currently deployed on the Fire Department’s paramedic engines. The current monitors are approaching their end of expected service life of five to seven years and replacement parts have become increasingly more difficult to procure as the units age.

The Zoll X Series Defibrillator/Monitor is a critical piece of technologically advanced equipment required on all Advanced Life Support (ALS) and Paramedic Assessment Units (PAU) responses, as outlined by the Orange County Emergency Medical Authority. The monitor enables paramedics to monitor cardiac rhythms, perform 12 lead EKGs, recognize cardiac events, and administer treatment in accordance with established Orange County protocols and procedures. The equipment also supports advanced airway management, including intubation for patients who are not breathing, and allows monitoring blood oxygen levels and carbon monoxide exposure.

Real-time transmission capabilities of the Zoll X Series Defibrillator/Monitors enable patient data to be electronically sent to the Base Station Hospital, where the emergency department physician can timely assess the information and order the appropriate medications and treatments to stabilize the patient during transport to the hospital.

The total cost is $239,860 and funding is recommended from the Public Safety Augmentation Fund (172) which may be used for public safety requests. There is no General Fund impact.

FY 2025-26 Fiscal Impact
Fund/Dept/Program No 1X Ongoing Total
Salary/Benefits $ - $ - $ -
Services/Supplies - - -
Capital Outlay 172 22 2222 4639 239,860 - 239,860
Subtotal $ 239,860 $ - $ 239,860
Offset - - -
Total $ 239,860 $ - $ 239,860
47 [INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
48 Community Center
Replacement Fund (181)
49 50
FY 2025-27 DECISION PACKAGE
Fiscal Year Request: 2025-27
Department: Community Services
Division: BCC Equipment Replacement
Request: Annual Fund 181 Requests
Recommendation:

Appropriate $285,000 into the Fiscal Year 2025-27 operating budget to upgrade and replace Community Services equipment and facilities for the identified projects below.

Background/Discussion:

The Community Center Replacement Fund (181) was established by City Council in 1997 as a method of retaining funds for future infrastructure and equipment replacements at the Brea Community Center (BCC). $167,000 is currently transferred from the General Fund (110) to this fund annually. No funds were used for the first ten years the fund existed, and the current fund balance is approximately $900,000 (including reserves).

These funds ensure the facility remains in optimal condition, which is of utmost importance since the BCC is the face of the City to many people with just over 450,000 annual visitors. Continuing these investments will ensure programs are able to successfully achieve equal or higher revenues as they rebound from the pandemic.

Community Services staff continues to partner with Public Works’ Building Division staff to verify needs, projects and associated costs. In Fiscal Year 2025-26, Community Services staff requests a total of $140,000 and $145,000 in Fiscal Year 2026-27, for a total of $285,000 for both years. Funding for this request is proposed from the Community Center Replacement Fund (181), and there is no General Fund impact.

Year One Projects:

Facility Table/Chair Replacement $15,000
Fitness Equipment Replacement $30,000
Parking Lot Landscaping $15,000
HVAC Replacement $30,000
Floor Refinishing (Group X/Hall) $10,000
Fitness Reformer Replacement $4,000
Basketball Gym Curtain Replacement $22,000
Basketball Gym Storage Doors Replacement $14,000
FY 2025-26 Total $140,000
Year Two Projects:

Facility Table/Chair Replacement $15,000
Fitness Equipment Replacement $30,000
Parking Lot Landscaping $15,000
HVAC Replacement $30,000
Floor Refinishing (Group X/Hall) $10,000
Facility Rentals – Bar Replacement (3) $20,000
Tiny Tots Flooring $24,000
Visix TVs (3) $1,000
FY 2026-27 Total $145,000
51 FY 2025-27 DECISION PACKAGE
FY 2025-27 Fiscal Impact
Fund/Dept/Program No 1X Ongoing Total
Salary/Benefits $ - $ - $ -
Services/Supplies - - -
Capital Outlay 181 40 4250 4639 285,000 - 285,000
Subtotal $ 285,000 $ - $ 285,000
Offset - - -
Total $ 285,000 $ - $ 285,000
52 Fixed Asset
Replacement Fund (182)
53 54
FY 2025-27 DECISION PACKAGE
Fiscal Year Request: 2025-27
Department: Community Services
Division: Theatre
Request: Curtis Theatre Facility Improvements (3 Year Plan) Recommendation:

Appropriate $205,000 into the Fiscal Year 2025-27 operating budget to upgrade and replace Curtis Theatre equipment and facilities for the identified projects below.

Background/Discussion:

In Fiscal Year 2020-21, Curtis Theatre staff prepared a three-year plan for facility improvements. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, funding and projects from that plan were delayed and staff is currently implementing the final improvements from that plan. It is now time to look beyond and plan for the next three years of needed improvements, which have been identified below:

Year One Projects:

Drapes $15,000
Projectors $15,000
FY 2025-26 Total $30,000
Year Two Project:

Stage Lighting Replacements $175,000
FY 2026-27 Total $175,000
Year Three Projects:

Dimming & Control System $35,000
Raceways & Breakouts $100,000
FY 2027-28 Total $135,000
Year one projects include replacement of the main curtain, drapes and motorized track system. The curtain and drapes are proposed to be replaced now in order to maintain fireproofing certification. The motorized track system for the curtain and drapes has not been replaced in over two decades and a professional refurbishment is recommended while the curtain and drapes are being replaced.

The projector and screen kit are also recommended to be upgraded in year one. This is to ensure the facility continues to meet the demand of its popular rental program as clients are often looking for equipment and capabilities that surpasses what the Curtis Theatre can offer. An improved system will be a draw for many rental clients.

In year two staff proposes an upgrade of the front and side stage lights which will replace all remaining incandescent fixtures to LED, as well as upgrade the lighting control panel to meet the needs of LED technology.

This improvement will not only save on electricity costs, but will also improve the service quality available to rental clients, as well as show quality for the Curtis Theatre’s own season. Current equipment is nearing end of 55 FY 2025-27 DECISION PACKAGE
lifespan and will require ongoing investment in parts and labor to continue operating. This equipment was last upgraded in 2004 and has an estimated lifespan of 15 years.

Though not included in this budget cycle, staff is projecting a necessary upgrade of the dimming and control system in year three, which is nearing the end of its lifespan, as well as a replacement of the power distribution raceway infrastructure which is original to the facility (1980). These items will be brought back to City Council for consideration in the next budget cycle.

Funding is being proposed from the City’s Fixed Asset Replacement Fund (182). Year one improvements are projected to cost $30,000 and year two improvements are projected to cost $175,000 for a total request of $205,000. Funding for year three is anticipated to cost $135,000 and will be requested as part of the Fiscal Year 2027-29 operating budget.

FY 2025-27 Fiscal Impact
Fund/Dept/Program No 1X Ongoing Total
Salary/Benefits $ - $ - $ -
Services/Supplies - - -
Capital Outlay 182 40 4542 4639 205,000 - 205,000
Subtotal $ 205,000 $ - $ 205,000
Offset - - -
Total $ 205,000 $ - $ 205,000
56 Water Utility Fund (420)
57 58
FY 2025-27 DECISION PACKAGE
Fiscal Year Request: 2025-27
Department: Public Works
Division: Water Utility
Request: Addition of one Full-Time Water Quality Specialist Position Recommendation:

Appropriate $185,374 into the Fiscal Year 2025-27 to fund one full-time Water Quality Specialist Position and purchase of one vehicle; and Amend the City’s Position Allocation List to add this authorized position or equivalent position.

Background/Discussion:

The City of Brea faces increasing regulatory demands at both the State and Federal levels as they highlight the critical need for an additional staff position within our Water Division Group. Presently, the responsibilities for Water Quality, Water Conservation, and Cross-Connection Control programs are shouldered by one part-time employee, with supplementary assistance from personnel in Environmental Services, and the Water Division. A comparative analysis shows a significant staff shortage compared to similar-sized cities in Orange County. The addition of staff is paramount to fully execute all required compliance tasks, ensuring adherence to every program requirement. This move will also alleviate tasks from other divisions, allowing them to focus on their specific responsibilities.

Cross-Connection Control Specialist - Of immediate concern is the recent adoption of the Cross-Connection Control Policy Handbook (CCCPH) from the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB). All Public Water Systems are required to implement a Cross-Connection Control Program, as dictated by California Health and Safety Code Section 116555.5 and Section 116407. The CCCPH will require the City to retain a dedicated CrossConnection Control Specialist in either a staff or consultant form to respond to potential backflow incidents within an hour. The CCCPH further establishes standards for routine inspection surveys and outreach requirements, that will demand a substantial investment of staff time, as there are currently approximately 2274 backflow devices in the City.

Urban Water Use Education - The state is also in the process of finalizing regulations for Urban Water Use Efficiency Standards. Once adopted these standards will require the City to set and meet goals for residential water use, commercial water use, and water loss. This will be a significant task for the Water Division group to undertake in its current size. Water conservation education would need to be increased through an increased presence at public outreach events and social media opportunities.

Failure to meet these future water quality, cross-connection, and conservation requirements could result in corrective action orders from the State. These include fines ranging from $1,000 to $25,000 per day per violation, or the possible revocation of the City’s water permit, as stated in California Health and Safety Code Section 116725. The inability to meet these standards could affect the trust our residents have in the water the City supplies and it would be difficult to regain that trust once lost. The City needs to continue to instill confidence in the water served to the residents and customers of Brea. Allocating resources for an additional staff position is an investment in safeguarding our water systems and upholding the highest standards of public health and environmental compliance.
59 FY 2025-27 DECISION PACKAGE
Staff recommends to add a full-time position with the title of Water Quality Specialist or equivalent to comply with the new regulatory requirements from the SWRCB and the addition of one new vehicle. If approved, staff will work with City’s Human Resource Division to identify job description, title and salary schedule that will be formally approved by City Council at a later date. Funding is recommended from the Water Utility Fund (420) and there is no General Fund impact.

FY 2025-27 Fiscal Impact
Fund/Dept/Program No 1X Ongoing Total
Salary/Benefits 420 51 5131 41xx $ - $ 149,374 $ 149,374 Services/Supplies - - -
Capital Outlay 420 51 5131 4641 36,000 - 36,000
Subtotal $ 36,000 $ 149,374 $ 185,374
Offset - - -
Total $ 36,000 $ 149,374 $ 185,374
60 External IT Services Fund (460)
61 62
FY 2025-27 DECISION PACKAGE
Fiscal Year Request: 2025-26
Department: Administrative Services
Division: Information Technology
Request: Replace Network Switches and Network Access Control System Recommendation:

Appropriate $393,003 into the Fiscal Year 2025-27 operating budget for the replacement of the City’s network switches infrastructure and installation of network access control system.

Background/Discussion:

In 2021, the President issued Executive Order (EO) 14028, Improving the Nation’s Cybersecurity, initiating a sweeping government-wide effort to ensure that baseline security practices are in place, to migrate the Federal Government to a zero-trust architecture, and to realize the security benefits of cloud-based infrastructure while mitigating associated risks. Although this is currently only mandated at the Federal level, staff anticipates this will soon filtered down to the local government level.

With the City’s existing network switches being 12 years old – well beyond the typical five (5) to seven (7) year lifecycle - the Brea’s Information Technology (IT) Division highly recommends replacement to align with the Nation’s cybersecurity objectives. New data switches provide stronger cybersecurity based on both hardware and software innovations and the use of AI. Our goal is to organize our network using the zero-trust maturity model recommended by the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA).

Network Access Control (NAC) is a key component of network security that provides visibility into the devices and users attempting to access an enterprise network. It enables organizations to control who is allowed onto the network by enforcing security policies and denying access to unauthorized users and non-compliant devices.

These unauthorized users can include cybercriminals, hackers, data thieves, and other bad actors that pose a threat to the organization. As IT take on the responsibility of authorizing users, this role has become even more critical with the increasing need to support remote access to our network from non-city devices like mobile phones, laptops, and tablets, as well as providing internet access to clients using their personal devices. These scenarios introduce security risks, making it essential for agencies to implement NAC solutions and to address network security. By implementing these measures, Brea will enhance its network security, align with national cybersecurity objectives, and mitigate potential risks associated with unauthorized access.

The estimated one-time cost to replace Brea’s core network switch (1) and 32 perimeter network switches at 11 City locations (City Yard, Senior Center, Plunge, Fire Stations, PD Annex, Brea Community Center, Theater, and the Civic Center), is $393,003 - inclusive of a 15 percent contingency.

The purchase will be funded using External IT Enterprise Fund (460) utilizing operational reserves and there is no General Fund impact.
63 FY 2025-27 DECISION PACKAGE
FY 2025-26 Fiscal Impact
Fund/Dept/Program No 1X Ongoing Total
Salary/Benefits $ - $ - $ -
Services/Supplies - - -
Capital Outlay 460 14 1474 4639 393,003 - 393,003
Subtotal $ 393,003 $ - $ 393,003
Offset - - -
Total $ 393,003 $ - $ 393,003
64 Information Technology Fund (475)
65 66
FY 2025-27 DECISION PACKAGE
Fiscal Year Request: 2025-26
Department: Administrative Services
Division: Information Technology
Request: Replace Citywide Desktop, Mobile Computer and Peripherals Recommendation:

Appropriate $1,183,385 into the Fiscal Year 2025-27 operating budget for the replacement of the City’s technology hardware and Windows 11 software upgrades inclusive of a 15% contingency.

Background/Discussion:

Every four (4) years the City conducts a computer replacement assessment to identify outdated equipment, improve cybersecurity, and plan for timely, cost-effective technology upgrades. Due to the COVID-19 closure, the assessment was pushed out an additional year. The assessment revealed that many existing computers are aging and that Windows 10 will reach end-of-life after October 14, 2025. To maintain operational efficiency and safeguard the City’s digital infrastructure, replacing Brea’s technology hardware and software is both necessary and time-sensitive.

Upgrading the hardware and software to Windows 11 is essential to improve device performance and productivity, enhance security, and ensure compatibility with modern software and programs. Staff suggests a four-year phased approach to upgrade and replace all desktops, mobile devices, computers, and required peripherals. Spacing out the workstation replacements over four (4) years will distribute costs, alleviating the financial stress on the City.

Phase one:

In FY 2025-26 staff will initiate phase one of this initiative and prioritize the replacement of the most critically used equipment within the organization, with focus on the City’s Fire and Police Department.

Hardware Type Count
Desktops 12
Laptops 132
Modems 44
Docking Stations 44
Tablets 18
iPads 46
The upcoming replacement initiative of our computer hardware, will also include upgrading the City’s Office Suite software. The IT Division is proposing to upgrade the current Office 365 licenses to the next tier, which includes free Office version upgrades, and data encryption software for laptops.

The remaining 185 computers with the Windows 10 version of Office Suite will manually be upgraded during this phase to Windows 11 by the IT Division, to lessen the financial impact during the budget cycle and ensure continued network security compliance.
67 FY 2025-27 DECISION PACKAGE
Phase two:

Phase two of the technology replacement and renewal program is planned to begin in FY 2027-28 with the replacement of the remaining technology equipment with new hardware and Windows operating system. This will be requested to be budgeted in the FY 2027-29 operating budget.

For Phase one, the proposed funding source for the requested equipment is the IT Internal Service Fund (475) in the amount of $1,183,385 utilizing operational reserves. Phase two is anticipated to be under $300,000 and funding will be requested as part of the next budget cycle. There is no General Fund impact.

FY 2025-26 Fiscal Impact
Fund/Dept/Program No 1X Ongoing Total
Salary/Benefits $ - $ - $ -
Services/Supplies - - -
Capital Outlay 475 14 1471 4639 1,183,385 - 1,183,385
Subtotal $ 1,183,385 $ - $ 1,183,385
Offset - - -
Total $ 1,183,385 $ - $ 1,183,385
68 Fire Impact Fees Fund (542)
69 70
FY 2025-27 DECISION PACKAGE
Fiscal Year Request: 2025-26
Department: Fire Services
Division: Fire Operations
Request: Purchase of Equipment and Tools for two Type 1 Fire Engines Recommendation:

Appropriate $400,000 into the Fiscal Year 2025-27 operating budget for the purchase of tools and equipment for the outfitting of two Type 1 Fire Engines.

Background/Discussion:

The Brea Fire Department is preparing for the arrival of three (3) new Pierce Type 1 Engines, expected in the first quarter of 2026. To ensure these apparatuses are operationally ready upon delivery, the department proposes the purchase of all necessary tools, radios, communication devices, equipment and installation for two of the engines. The third engine will be outfitted utilizing tools and equipment from a current reserve apparatus that will be decommissioned when the new units arrive. By doing this, the City will save money from having to purchase an additional set of tools and equipment.

The Brea Fire Department requires fully equipped engines to maintain operational readiness and meet the growing demands of the community. Without the necessary tools and equipment, the new Pierce Type 1 Engines cannot be deployed effectively, hindering emergency response capabilities.

The total cost for outfitting two (2) units is estimated to be $200,000 per Engine or $400,000 in total. Funding for this equipment is recommended from the City’s Fire Impact Fees Fund (542) and there is no General Fund impact.

FY 2025-26 Fiscal Impact
Fund/Dept/Program No 1X Ongoing Total
Salary/Benefits $ - $ - $ -
Services/Supplies - - -
Capital Outlay 542 22 2221 4639 400,000 - 400,000
Subtotal $ 400,000 $ - $ 400,000
Offset - - -
Total $ 400,000 $ - $ 400,000
71 [INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
72 2025-27 DECISION PACKAGES ON HOLD
The following is a summary of decision package request(s) that were submitted as part of the budget process and are not currently included in the proposed FY 2025-27 budget. The Budget Team’s recommendation to place a request on hold may be the result of further discussion pending, or funding not currently available to support the request. City Staff may bring requests back for consideration as the availability of funding allows, or if the need addressed by the request is prioritized at a later time.

ON HOLD
Year 1 Year 2
FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27
Net Cost Net Cost
Organization Wide
Staffing Changes
Staffing requests in the form of additional positions, various reclassifications, promotions, and status changes from Part-Time to Full-Time were submitted. These requests would impact multiple departments including Community Development, Community Services, Police Services and Public Works, with some requests including the purchase of a vehicle in Year 1 of the budget cycle.

REQUEST TOTAL $ 1,447,307 $ 899,947
Administrative Services Department
Reprographic Equipment Replacement
Replacement of outdated laminating and paper folding equipment was requested by the Reprographics Services Division, which collectively supports the production of more than 100,000 printed items each year for both City departments and client agencies. The existing laminator, purchased in 2006, and paper folding machine, purchased in 1995, have both exceeded their useful life and are experiencing increased maintenance issues and part shortages. To maintain reliable and efficient reprographic services, staff recommends replacing both machines. The total cost of $16,700 includes equipment, installation, training, and a three-year warranty, and would be funded from the City’s Fixed Asset Replacement Fund.

REQUEST TOTAL $ 16,700 $ -
73 2025-27 DECISION PACKAGES ON HOLD

ON HOLD
Year 1 Year 2
FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27
Net Cost Net Cost
Community Development Department
Clarity Development Software Purchase
Clariti Development Software is a digital tool would serve as a user-friendly guide for applicants, providing stepby-step instructions, project-specific requirements using GIS mapping, and automated estimates for fees and timelines. The request to purchase this software would enhance the efficiency, clarity, and accessibility of the City’s development and permitting process, and has the potential to reduce the need for in-person visits and staff time spent answering common questions. The software would streamline operations, improve customer experience, and support the City’s broader goals of transparency, efficiency, and economic development.

REQUEST TOTAL $ 17,000 $ 17,000
Fire Department
Ambulance and Equipment Purchase
The purchase of a fourth ambulance was requested to enhance emergency response capabilities and reduce reliance on private ambulance services during peak call times. With two ambulances currently in service and one held in reserve, adding a fourth unit would allow for three to be deployed regularly while maintaining a backup for mechanical or operational needs. This expansion would improve service delivery, increase operational efficiency, and ensure that more emergency calls are handled directly by Brea Fire personnel, aligning with the department’s goal of providing consistent, high-quality care to the community.

REQUEST TOTAL $ 465,000 $ -
Standards of Cover and Community Risk Assessment Study
A request to initiate a new Standards of Cover and Community Risk Assessment study was submitted to evaluate current service levels, assess future needs, and guide strategic planning over the next several years. This update would follow the previous study that supported the City's decision to end its joint command with Fullerton and comes at a time when Brea experiences significant growth through large-scale developments. The study will provide a data-driven foundation for optimizing resource deployment, improving operational efficiency, and ensuring the department continues meeting community emergency service needs effectively and sustainably.

REQUEST TOTAL $ 75,000 $ -
74 2025-27 DECISION PACKAGES ON HOLD

ON HOLD
Year 1 Year 2
FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27
Net Cost Net Cost
Fire Department (continued)
Emergency Operations Center (EOC) Upgrade
Upgrading the EOC would enhance emergency preparedness and response capabilities, and allow for effective communication, coordination, and situational awareness during emergencies. The current facility has not been significantly updated in over two decades and modern technology would provide a state-of-the-art command center equipped with advanced communication tools, updated audio/visual systems, and improved infrastructure.

REQUEST TOTAL $ 365,000 $ -
Fire Support Vehicle Upgrade
The Fire Support Vehicle lacks the technology and communication tools needed for effective multi-agency coordination, real-time situational awareness, and efficient resource tracking. Upgrading the vehicle would enhance the department’s ability to respond to large-scale emergencies, improve firefighter safety, and strengthen command and control functions. This investment supports the City’s broader commitment to public safety and modern emergency preparedness.

REQUEST TOTAL $ 100,000 $ -
Accela Software Upgrade
A comprehensive upgrade to the Accela software system was requested to enhance operational efficiency, improve service delivery, and promote better alignment across departments. Currently, inconsistent versions and configurations hinder data integration, communication, and workflow standardization. Upgrading the system—particularly to integrate the Fire Department—would create a unified platform that supports streamlined processes, reduces redundancies, and enables improved online services for contractors and residents. This investment in the City’s digital infrastructure would foster greater interdepartmental collaboration, enhance customer service, and support more efficient and consistent operations citywide.

REQUEST TOTAL $ 25,000 $ -
Police Department
Police Department Professional Development
The Police Department’s professional development program is designed to enhance employee engagement, satisfaction, and overall wellbeing through off-site workshops. These workshops, facilitated by Breaking the Chain Consulting, build on previous successful sessions and serve as valuable tools for recruitment and retention. The continuation of this program includes strength-based assessments and focuses on multiple aspects of employee wellbeing.

REQUEST TOTAL $ 60,000 $ 55,000
75 2025-27 DECISION PACKAGES ON HOLD

ON HOLD
Year 1 Year 2
FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27
Net Cost Net Cost
Police Department Requests (continued)
Veritone Contact Digital Platform
A request to implement a more efficient, mobile-optimized platform for collecting Racial and Identity Profiling Act (RIPA) data was submitted. The proposed system, Veritone Contact, would streamline the data entry process, allowing officers to complete reports more quickly and accurately in the field. This enhancement would reduce administrative burdens, increase time available for community engagement, and improve compliance with state reporting requirements.

REQUEST TOTAL $ 4,650 $ 4,650
Parking Citation Software
A transition from paper to electronic parking citations was requested, which would implement Turbo Data’s mobile citation software. This change would improve efficiency, accuracy, and environmental sustainability by allowing officers to issue citations directly from their existing iOS work phones and Zebra printers. The new system would streamline citation processing, enable real-time uploads for immediate payment options, and eliminate the need for paper citations and outdated devices, ultimately enhancing productivity and reducing operational costs.

REQUEST TOTAL $ 15,200 $ 13,200
Desk Chair Replacement
A request to replace aging and uncomfortable desk chairs in the Police Records and Property & Evidence Divisions was submitted. The current chairs, in use since 2012, are worn, stained, and no longer provide adequate support, even with the use of cushions and back supports. Replacing these chairs would align with the department’s focus on employee wellness and the City Council’s goal of improving employee relations and retention.

REQUEST TOTAL $ 11,593 $ -
Records Request Tracking Solution
A request to expand the City’s existing contract with the current public records request software vendor was submitted in order to streamline the intake, processing, and tracking of police records requests. This system would replace the current manual and paper-based process with an online portal that improves efficiency, enhances customer service, and supports legal compliance with mandated response times. By automating workflows, enabling secure payments, and providing data analytics, the system would help staff manage high volumes of time-sensitive requests more effectively.

REQUEST TOTAL $ 12,204 $ 12,814
76 2025-27 DECISION PACKAGES ON HOLD

ON HOLD
Year 1 Year 2
FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27
Net Cost Net Cost
Police Department (continued)
Canine Ballistic Vests
The purchase of custom ballistic vests for two police service dogs was requested to enhance their safety during high-risk deployments. These vests would provide protection against pistol-caliber threats and puncture injuries, offering improved mobility, comfort, and scalability. Equipping the canines with this specialized gear would help safeguard them during dangerous operations such as suspect apprehensions and SWAT team support, aligning with the department’s commitment to officer and public safety.

REQUEST TOTAL $ 7,911 $ -
Body-Worn Camera Auditing Software
The purchase of specialized software was requested to support random audits of body-worn camera footage, a practice recognized as an industry best standard for promoting accountability, training, and policy compliance.

The software would streamline and standardize the review process by providing randomized video selections for evaluation, helping supervisors identify both areas of concern and exemplary performance. This tool would enhance the department’s ability to conduct effective and efficient audits in alignment with professional policing guidelines.

REQUEST TOTAL $ 5,000 $ 4,000
Vehicle Forensic Tool
A request was submitted for the purchase of Berla iVe, a vehicle forensic tool, that would significantly enhance the Police Department’s ability to investigate crimes involving modern vehicles. As vehicles increasingly store critical data—such as speed logs, location history, and connected device records—having the capability to access and analyze this information can provide key evidence in complex cases. The proposed solution includes hardware, software, and training to support the full forensic process, allowing investigators to uncover details about what occurred, where, and who was involved in vehicle-related incidents. This would modernize investigative capabilities and strengthen the department’s response to evolving criminal tactics.

REQUEST TOTAL $ 30,550 $ 10,500
Facility Dog Program
The launch of a Facility Dog program was requested, aimed at supporting officer wellness, enhancing victim advocacy, and expanding community outreach. This program would provide therapeutic support, particularly during or after critical incidents, while also assisting with victim interviews and public events. The dog will be integrated into the Peer Support Team and available to support both internal needs and regional law enforcement partners. While Canine Companions provides the dog, training, and certification at no cost, the department seeks funding for equipment and ongoing care to ensure the success of the program.

REQUEST TOTAL $ 2,985 $ 2,350
77 [INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
78 Actual Adopted Estimated Budget Budget
FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25 FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27
Beginning Balance 7/1 12,818,835 $ 683,788 $ 683,788 $ 2,788,339 $ 3,997,142 $ Resources
Revenues
Property Tax 14,815,291 15,488,808 15,406,829 16,093,414 16,652,118 Sales Tax 25,155,351 26,559,944 24,934,260 27,269,550 27,439,453 Transient Occupancy Tax 2,616,587 2,782,998 2,628,607 2,681,179 2,734,802 Franchise Tax 3,149,044 2,965,292 2,936,938 3,061,203 3,128,903 Business Tax 1,156,337 1,100,000 1,100,000 1,100,000 1,100,000 Licenses & Permits 287,696 403,429 346,101 415,563 517,518 Motor Vehicle In-Lieu Fees 5,487,120 5,686,914 5,725,491 5,909,002 6,122,182 Community Services 3,378,520 3,218,043 3,398,568 3,744,406 3,855,856 All Other 9,334,806 16,261,756 17,184,465 9,179,969 9,194,799 Sub-total Revenues 65,380,752 74,467,184 73,661,259 69,454,286 70,745,631 Transfers-in
Comm. Benefit & Economic Dev. (140) - - - - 300,000
Public Safety Augmentation (172) - - - 250,000 500,000
Supplemental Law Enf. Services (173) 100,000 100,000 100,000 180,000 180,000 Fixed Asset Replacement (182) - 57,500 27,500 - -
Gas Tax (220) 450,000 450,000 450,000 450,000 450,000
Golf Course (465) - - - 1,300,000 1,300,000
Risk Management (470) - 150,000 654,395 - -
Disaster/Emergency Relief Fund (911) - - 37,588 - -
Sub-total Transfers-in 1,231,895 550,000 795,088 2,180,000 2,730,000 Transfer from Reserves 1,910,550 1,163,985 8,237,599 1,905,206 - Total Resources 68,523,197 76,181,169 82,693,946 73,539,492 73,475,631 Total Available 81,342,032 76,864,957 83,377,734 76,327,831 77,472,773 1 1 0 G E N E R A L F U N D
The General Fund is used to account for all of the general revenues of the City not specifically levied or collected for other City funds and for the expenditures related to the rendering of general services by the City. The General Fund is used to account for all resources not required to be accounted for in any other fund.
79 Actual Adopted Estimated Budget Budget
FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25 FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27
Requirements
Expenditures
Management Services 3,389,030 3,775,184 4,532,257 4,572,303 4,876,360 Administrative Services 4,373,953 4,373,635 4,443,415 3,263,343 3,387,323 Police Services 28,779,696 29,841,042 29,397,209 30,916,065 33,170,004 Fire Services 9,498,450 11,026,771 10,443,865 10,974,878 11,475,385 Community Development 2,921,229 3,559,428 3,435,779 2,960,401 3,114,098 Community Services 9,424,717 9,465,702 9,935,229 9,993,687 10,242,431 Public Works 6,522,065 7,463,465 7,170,523 7,554,011 7,765,725 Sub-total Expenditures 64,909,140 69,505,227 69,358,277 70,234,688 74,031,326 Transfers-out
Paramedic Services (174) 2,554,982 1,737,276 2,738,549 2,040,001 2,345,495 Community Center Replacement (181) 167,000 167,000 167,000 - - Fixed Asset Replacement (182) 1,100,000 1,300,000 1,300,000 - - Sanitation & Street Sweeping (440) 375,252 101,324 - - - Internal IT Services (475) - - - - -
Capital Improvement (510) - - 6,331,684 - -
Capital & Mitigation Imp Fund (560) 56,000 56,000 56,000 56,000 56,000 Sub-total Transfers-out 4,253,234 3,361,600 10,593,233 2,096,001 2,401,495 Transfers to Reserves 11,495,870 - 637,885 - 1,025,533
Total Requirements 80,658,244 72,866,827 80,589,395 72,330,689 77,458,354 Ending Balance 6/30 $ 683,788 $ 3,998,130 $ 2,788,339 $ 3,997,142 $ 14,419 Reserves
Operating Reserve 10% 7,739,997 7,286,683 7,995,151 7,233,069 7,643,282 Budget Stabilization Reserve 15% 11,609,996 10,930,024 11,992,727 10,849,603 11,464,923 Encumbrances 8,237,599 - - - -
Total Reserves $ 27,587,592 $ 18,216,707 $ 19,987,878 $ 18,082,672 $ 19,108,205 1 1 0 G E N E R A L F U N D
80 Actual Adopted Estimated Budget Budget
FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25 FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27
Beginning Balance 7/1 6,148,566 $ 7,012,994 $ 7,012,994 $ 392,346 $ 345,346 $ Resources
Revenues
Olinda Host Fees 965,529 1,300,000 898,131 - -
Total Resources 965,529 1,300,000 898,131 - -
Total Available 7,114,095 8,312,994 7,911,125 392,346 345,346 Requirements
Expenditures - - -
Transfers-out
General Fund (110) - - - - 300,000
Capital Improvement (510) 101,101 550,000 7,518,779 47,000 - Total Requirements 101,101 550,000 7,518,779 47,000 300,000 Ending Balance 6/30 $ 7,012,994 $ 7,762,994 $ 392,346 $ 345,346 $ 45,346 1 4 0 C O M M U N I T Y B E N E F I T &

E C O N O M I C D E V E L O P M E N T ( C B E D ) F U N D This fund was established in 2014 to retain funds which are set aside annually for the continuation of "legacy" community benefited projects as well as provide a funding source for the attraction and retention of business and economic development. 81 Actual Adopted Estimated Budget Budget
FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25 FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27
Beginning Balance 7/1 395,026 $ 298,339 $ 298,339 $ 239,089 $ - Resources
Revenues
Sales Tax 599,777 634,000 589,400 578,000 581,700
Interest 14,744 14,000 14,000 14,000 14,000
Total Revenues 614,521 648,000 603,400 592,000 595,700
Transfers-in
Fixed Asset Replacement (182) - - - - -
Transfer from Reserves - - - 331,834 216,734
Total Resources 614,521 648,000 603,400 923,834 812,434 Total Available 1,009,547 946,339 901,739 1,162,923 812,434 Requirements
Expenditures 327,234 401,864 402,514 912,923 312,434
Transfers-out
General Fund (110) - - 250,000 - 500,000
Transfer to Reserves 383,974 260,136 260,136 - -
Total Requirements 711,208 662,000 662,650 1,162,923 812,434 Ending Balance 6/30 $ 298,339 $ 284,339 $ 239,089 $ - - Reserves
Equipment Replacement 760,761 1,020,897 1,020,897 689,063 472,329 Total Reserves $ 760,761 $ 1,020,897 $ 1,020,897 $ 689,063 $ 472,329 1 7 2 P U B L I C S A F E T Y

A U G M E N T A T I O N F U N D
The Public Safety Augmentation Fund is used to account for sales tax revenue generated by the enactment of Proposition 172 and for expenditures related to the enhancement of public safety services. 82 Actual Adopted Estimated Budget Budget
FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25 FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27
Beginning Balance 7/1 545,641 $ 552,819 $ 552,819 $ 407,016 $ 267,016 $ Resources
Transfers-in
General Fund (110) 167,000 167,000 167,000 - -
Total Resources 167,000 167,000 167,000 - -
Total Available 712,641 719,819 719,819 407,016 267,016 Requirements
Expenditures 159,822 167,000 312,803 140,000 145,000
Transfers to Reserves - - - - -
Total Requirements 159,822 167,000 312,803 140,000 145,000 Ending Balance 6/30 $ 552,819 $ 552,819 $ 407,016 $ 267,016 $ 122,016 Reserves
Capital and Equip. Replacement 501,000 501,000 501,000 501,000 501,000 Total Reserves $ 501,000 $ 501,000 $ 501,000 $ 501,000 $ 501,000 1 8 1 C O M M U N I T Y C E N T E R

R E P L A C E M E N T F U N D
This fund was established in May 1997 to retain funds which are set aside annually for the future replacement of the Community Center facility and equipment.
83 Actual Adopted Estimated Budget Budget
FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25 FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27
Beginning Balance 7/1 1,718,200 $ 1,106,226 $ 1,106,226 $ -$ -$ Resources
Transfers-in
General Fund (110) 1,100,000 1,300,000 1,300,000 - -
Transfer from Reserves - - 566,400 930,000 175,000
Total Resources 1,100,000 1,300,000 1,866,400 930,000 175,000 Total Available 2,818,200 2,406,226 2,972,626 930,000 175,000 Requirements
Transfers-out
General Fund (110) 27,500 - 57,500 30,000 175,000
Information Technology (475) 135,815 - - - -
Capital Improvement (510) 532,295 790,000 2,915,126 900,000 - Transfers to Reserves 711,365 - - - -
Total Requirements 1,711,975 790,000 2,972,626 930,000 175,000 Ending Balance 6/30 1,106,226 1,616,226 - - -
Reserves
Capital/Equip. Replacement 3,300,000 3,300,000 2,733,600 1,803,600 1,628,600 Total Reserves $ 3,300,000 $ 3,300,000 $ 2,733,600 $ 1,803,600 $ 1,628,600 1 8 2 F I X E D A S S E T R E P L A C E M E N T F U N D The Fixed Asset Replacement Fund was established in March 2002 to provide funding for the replacement of City-owned infrastructure, facilities and capital assets.
84 Actual Adopted Estimated Budget Budget
FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25 FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27
Beginning Balance 7/1 2,852,166 $ 5,059,533 $ 5,059,533 $ 5,358,434 $ 5,614,437 $ Resources
Revenues
Charges for Services 20,457,250 18,604,900 21,962,700 21,962,700 21,962,700 Connection Fees 146,396 76,162 76,162 76,162 76,162
Interest 249,68 7 - 300,000 280,000 280,000
Other 311,799 495,000 455,830 437,500 440,125
Total Resources 21,165,132 19,176,062 22,794,692 22,756,362 22,758,987 Transfer from Reserves 1,273,694 136,366 334,586 - -
Total Available 25,290,992 24,371,961 28,188,811 28,114,796 28,373,424 Requirements
Expenditures 18,980,157 18,434,691 17,544,741 19,200,835 19,528,550 Transfers-out
Capital Improvement (510) 1,251,302 500,000 5,285,636 2,860,000 3,950,000 Transfer to Reserves - - - 439,524 108,729
Total Requirements 20,231,459 18,934,691 22,830,377 22,500,359 23,587,279 Ending Balance 6/30 $ 5,059,533 $ 5,437,270 $ 5,358,434 $ 5,614,437 $ 4,786,145 Reserves
Section 115 Trust (PARS) 485,532 485,532 509,800 535,300 562,100 Operations (3 months) 4,745,039 4,608,673 4,386,185 4,800,209 4,882,138 Capital 5,000,000 5,000,000 5,000,000 5,000,000 5,000,000 Total Reserves $ 10,230,571 $ 10,094,205 $ 9,895,985 $ 10,335,509 $ 10,444,238 4 2 0 W A T E R U T I L I T Y F U N D
This fund is used to account for the City's water utility operations which are financed and operated in a manner similar to a private enterprise. The costs (expenses, including depreciation) of providing these services to the general public on a continuing basis are financed or recovered primarily through user charges. 85 Actual Adopted Estimated Budget Budget
FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25 FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27
Beginning Balance 7/1 485,831 $ 211,021 $ 211,021 $ 79,804 $ -$ Resources
Revenues
Charges for Services 1,064,274 1,014,506 906,000 341,699 358,784 Interest 14,188 14,660 15,000 12,700 14,200
Sub-total Revenues 1,078,462 1,029,166 921,000 354,399 372,984 Transfer from Reserves - - - 239,202 -
Total Resources 1,078,462 1,029,166 921,000 593,601 372,984 Total Available 1,564,293 1,240,187 1,132,021 673,405 372,984 Requirements
Expenditures 1,056,922 1,081,430 1,041,904 673,405 286,272 Transfer to Reserves 296,350 6,127 10,314 - 86,712
Total Requirements 1,353,272 1,087,557 1,052,218 673,405 372,984 Ending Balance 6/30 $ 211,021 $ 152,630 $ 79,804 -$ -$
Reserves
Section 115 Trust (PARS) 281,364 281,364 295,432 310,204 325,714 Operations (3 months) 264,231 270,358 260,476 6,502 77,704 Total Reserves $ 545,595 $ 551,722 $ 555,908 $ 316,706 $ 403,418 4 6 0 I N F O R M A T I O N T E C H N O L O G Y

E X T E R N A L S U P P O R T F U N D
This fund is used to account for the operations of the Information Technology Division's contractual information technology services to other agencies. The costs (expenses) of providing these services on a continuing basis are financed or recovered through user charges.
86 Actual Adopted Estimated Budget Budget
FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25 FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27
Beginning Balance 7/1 619,051 $ 750,927 $ 750,927 $ 579,693 $ -$ Resources
Revenues
Charges for Services 2,486,832 2,486,832 2,486,832 2,899,210 3,010,051 Interest 20,348 26,100 20,000 16,000 16,000
Other - - - - -
Total Resources 2,642,995 2,512,932 2,506,832 2,915,210 3,026,051 Transfer from Reserves 29,848 - - 510,591 -
Total Available 3,291,894 3,263,859 3,257,759 4,005,494 3,026,051 Requirements
Expenditures 2,540,967 2,650,646 2,670,225 4,005,494 3,008,930 Transfer to Reserves - 32,314 27,420 - 17,121
Total Requirements 2,540,967 2,678,066 2,702,539 4,005,494 3,026,051 Ending Balance 6/30 $ 750,927 $ 561,320 $ 579,693 -$ -$ Reserves
Operations (3 months) 635,242 667,556 662,662 152,071 169,192 Total Reserves $ 635,242 $ 667,556 $ 662,662 $ 152,071 $ 169,192 4 7 5 I N F O R M A T I O N T E C H N O L O G Y

I N T E R N A L S U P P O R T F U N D
This fund is used to account for the operations of the City's Internal Information Technology Division. Such costs are billed to the departments and/or divisions based upon a predetermined rate set during the budget process. 87 Actual Adopted Estimated Budget Budget
FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25 FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27
Beginning Balance 7/1 531,046 $ 509,066 $ 509,066 $ 504,348 $ 817,427 $ Resources
Revenues
Impact Fees 7,691 4,207 2,232 712,029 498,125
Interest 19,726 11,300 8,000 16,000 20,000
Total Resources 27,417 15,507 10,232 728,029 518,125
Total Available 524,573 519,298 1,232,37 558,463 7 1,335,552 Requirements
Expenditures 49,39 7 13,450 14,950 414,950 14,950
Total Requirements 49,397 13,450 14,950 414,950 14,950
Ending Balance 6/30 $ 509,066 $ 511,123 $ 504,348 $ 817,427 $ 1,320,602 5 4 2 F I R E I M P A C T F E E S F U N D
This fund is used to account for the receipt and expenditure of impact fees collected from developers to mitigate the future impact that development has on fire services.
88 Successor Agency to the Brea Redevelopment Agency
FY 2025-27 BUDGET

The City assumed the role of Successor Agency to the Brea Redevelopment Agency in 2012 following the State’s elimination of redevelopment agencies. The Successor Agency is responsible for winding down the former redevelopment agency after its 40 years of operation. A critical component of this process is the Last and Final Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (LFROPS), which was approved by Brea’s Oversight Board and accepted by the State Department of Finance (DOF) in 2018. This document summarizes expenditures of enforceable obligations remaining for the Successor Agency.

With the wind down process, including the activities mentioned above, now complete, much of the process is finalized. The approval of a Last and Final Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS) means the Successor Agency no longer has to submit Annual ROPS to the County oversight board. Consequently, further reductions to administrative allowances from the ROPS are reflected in the budget. Brea’s Oversight Board has now been disbanded and remaining staff expenditures are focused on the administration and payment of all outstanding bonds, as programmed in the Administrative Services (Finance Division). 89 Successor Agency to the Brea Redevelopment Agency

EXPENDITURE SUMMARY
FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27
Long Term Obligations
Bond Payments $ 13,187,281 $ 11,878,538

Total $ 13,187,281 $ 11,878,538
Administration
Professional Services $ 10,000 $ 20,000
Legal, Accounting and Auditing, and Support Services $ 12,500 $ 25,000

Total $ 22,500 $ 45,000

TOTAL AGENCY BUDGET $ 13,209,781 $ 11,923,538
90 CITY OF BREA

SEVEN-YEAR

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT

PROGRAM

PROPOSED
FY 2025-2026 through FY 2031-2032
HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL:

I am pleased to submit the Proposed Fiscal 2027-2032 Proposed Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for the City of Brea. The Proposed Capital Budget and CIP presented in this document will guide the City in the planning, scheduling, and budgeting capital improvement projects over the next seven years. This overview highlights the significant capital investments within the seven areas and the major items associated with this CIP.

Maintaining public assets is some of the most important work a City performs. The current outlook on capital revenues allows the City to further its efforts to invest in a wide range of public infrastructure, such as our streets, water facilities, sewer collection system, parks and sports fields, fire, and police facilities, and to our golf courses to meet the long-term needs of our community. Many of the projects in this document result from the technical analysis necessary to identify new or deferred infrastructure rehabilitation needs.

The Public Works Department, in coordination with all City Departments, has prepared the sevenyear Capital Improvement Program (CIP) budget plan. The goals of the CIP are to enhance the community's quality of life, ensure a safe environment, and improve transportation, utilities, and City facilities. The CIP budget plan is both a planning and implementation document. The sevenyear CIP includes the appropriation of funds for Fiscal Year (FY) 2025-26 and FY 2026-27.

Consistent with the City’s Budget, this is a two-year request. The remaining five years of the CIP are not a commitment of funds but used as a long-range planning tool for subsequent investments in the City's infrastructure.

There are currently 72 projects in the 7-year CIP budget plan estimated at nearly $112 million.

These projects are either continuing, new, or annual programs and are in various stages of development, such as planning, design, or construction. Staff is requesting $9,285,000 in new funding for FY 2025-26 and $5,850,000 in new funding for FY 2026-27. The 2025-32 Proposed CIP of nearly $112 million across multiple funding sources represents the investment into the City’s valuable assets and reflects the City’s continued focus on the rehabilitation and renewal of existing infrastructure to serve our community well into the future.

The CIP has several improvement categories: Street, Storm Drain, Traffic Safety, Sewer, Water, Facility, and Golf Course Improvements. The following are highlights of the FY 2025-27 Biennial Capital Improvement Program:

Street Improvements
Several significant projects completed construction in FY23-25, including Country Hills Subdivision Pavement/Water Rehabilitation (CIP 7322), Brea Boulevard Street Improvements (CIP 7299), and the bridge construction phase of SR-57 Freeway/Lambert Road Interchange (CIP 7251). Additionally, the design phase of Central Avenue & State College Street Improvements (CIP 7327) has been completed. Work continues on Phase 2 | P a g e
C I P M e s s a g e
1 of Birch Street Improvements S. Associated to Valencia (CIP 7329), a large water/roadway improvement project that is being carried forward from FY24-25 Requested appropriations for the FY25-27 7-year CIP include funding for our annual Traffic Calming Improvements (CIP 7219), Citywide Slurry Seal (7312), and Citywide Sidewalk Replacement (CIP 7313), projects as well as design and construction budget for Palm Street Paving Improvements (CIP 7334) and Tanglewood Street Paving Improvements (CIP 7337).

Storm Drain
Requested appropriations for the FY25-27 7-year CIP includes design phase funding for for an update to the Storm Drain Master Plan (CIP 7330).

Traffic Safety
The construction phase of the Cliffwood Neighborhood Traffic Calming Improvements (CIP 7717) project was completed in FY23-25. The City also partnered with OCTA and multiple local municipalities to progress OCTA’s Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program (RTSSP). Two projects have been introduced from this effort, the Kraemer Blvd. Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization (CIP 7720) and the State College Blvd. Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization (CIP 7721).

Requested appropriations for the FY25-27 7-year CIP include funding for our annual Traffic Signal Controller Upgrade (CIP 7218) project, Transportation Improvement Nexus Program Update (CIP 7718) project, and the two aforementioned RTSSP projects.

Water
Several significant projects were completed in FY23-25, including the Country Hills Phase 2 Waterline Improvements (CIP 7322), Walnut-Juniper-Orange Waterline Improvements (CIP 7454), South Brea Neighborhood Water Main Replacement (CIP 7466), Rehabilitate Ring Road at Berry Street Reservoir (CIP 7965), and N. Associated Rd. New High Pressure Water Line (CIP 7476). Additionally, the design phases of Enterprise Tract Water Improvements (CIP 7462) and Candlewood Tract Water Main Replacement (CIP 7465) are progressing, while the design phase of Lotus Place Water Line Improvements (CIP 7479) has been completed.

Requested appropriations for the FY25-27 7-year CIP include design phase funding for Candlewood Tract Water Main Replacement (CIP 7465), Olinda Village Water Line Improvements (CIP 7482), Replace Generator at Berry Street Booster Pump Station (CIP 7483), and design and construction phase funding for Thompson Oil Site Hydrant Improvements (CIP 7494).

Sewer
The design phases of the Briarwood Lift Station Replacement (CIP 7631) and the Brea Creek Siphon S-2 Analysis (CIP 7633) projects were completed in FY23-25.

Requested appropriations for the FY25-27 7-year CIP include our annual Sewer Mainline Relining (CIP 7617) and design phase funding for the Carbon Canyon Access Road Phase 1-3 (CIP 7632) project.
3 | P a g e
C I P M e s s a g e
Facility Improvements
Fiscal Years 23-25 saw the completion of New Switch Gear Boxes at Arovista & Country Hills Parks (CIP 7960), the Senior Center Generator Project (7977), and the design phase of the Tamarack Parking Lot Asphalt Rehabilitation (CIP 7965) project. Additionally, the Brea PD Integrated Crime Center (ICC) Citywide Camera Network is progressing through various phases, and the Arovista Park Modernization Project (CIP 7978) is progressing through the construction phase of park improvements on the east side of Brea Creek.

Requested appropriations for the FY25-27 7-year CIP include funding for the Police Department Space Plan Improvements (CIP 7992), Wildcatters Park Storage Building Improvements (CIP 7997), the Public Works Standard Plans Update (CIP 7998), as well as various other citywide facility improvements.

Golf Course Improvements
In FY23-25 various improvements were made at both Birch Hills and Brea Creek Golf Courses, including the Brea Creek Golf Course Netting Extension project.

Requested appropriations for the FY25-27 7-year CIP include funding for the construction of cart path, driving range, storage shed, and HVAC improvements at Birch Hills Golf Course as well as repairs to the clubhouse and other amenities at the Brea Creek Golf Course.

Projects delivered over the next seven years will improve the City’s roadways, address the reliability and appearance of parks and recreational facilities, significantly upgrade the City’s water and sewer system, deliver continued improvements to building facilities, add technology upgrades to our traffic signals, and reduce pollutants within storm drains and creeks. The City will also continue to work with other agencies on major regional projects, including State Route 90, 142 & 57, and the Orange County Loop/Tracks Western Extension, which will dramatically alter the City's transportation infrastructure.

While the Proposed CIP addresses primary infrastructure needs, a significant infrastructure maintenance backlog remains. City staff will continue to target resources toward their most important need and seek all possible avenues to secure federal, State, and regional funding to supplement available City funding.

This CIP reflects the needs and priorities of the City Council, our residents, businesses, and visitors. I want to acknowledge and thank the many employees who directly contributed to the analysis and production of this CIP and document. More importantly, I want to thank the City Council for the continued support of this program. Your continued support helps the City meet its overall goal of providing well-maintained, quality infrastructure for our community.

Respectfully,
Michael Ho, P.E.

Public Works Director
RESOLUTION NO.

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BREA

ADOPTING A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM BUDGET
FOR SAID CITY FOR THE FISCAL YEAR OF 2025-2026 AND
2026-2027 AND APPROPRIATING FUNDS FOR PROJECTS
AND PURPOSES THEREIN SET FORTH.

A. RECITALS:
(i) The City Manager’s proposed Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Budget for Fiscal Year (FY) 2025-2026 and FY 2026-2027, heretofore, has been presented to the Planning Commission and to this Council. (ii) Copies of said proposed CIP budget are on file in the Office of the City Clerk and said proposed budget is hereby made a part of this resolution.

B. RESOLUTION:

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FOUND, DETERMINED AND RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brea that:

1. Said proposed CIP budget is hereby adopted as the CIP Budget of the City of Brea for FY 2025-2026 and FY 2026-2027 consisting of the estimated and anticipated expenditures and revenue for this fiscal year.

2. All capital project appropriation balances from FY 2024-2025 shall be carried forward for use in FY 2025-2026 and FY 2026-2027.

3. There are hereby appropriated for obligation and expenditure by the City Manager the amounts shown as set forth in the pages of the proposed budget for FY 2025-2026 and FY 2026-2027.

4. Said appropriations for obligation and expenditure shall be deemed to relate to each separate project set forth and shall include as to each project the total of the sums listed in the proposed budget. All obligations and expenditures shall be incurred and made in the manner provided by the provisions of State law and City ordinances and resolutions applicable to purchasing and contracting.

5. No warrant shall be issued or indebtedness incurred which exceeds the unexpended balances of the project appropriation herein before authorized unless such appropriations shall have been amended by a supplemental appropriation duly enacted by the City Council by resolution.

APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 17th day of June 2025.
________________________________
Mayor
ATTEST: ________________________________
City Clerk
I, Lillian Harris-Neal, City Clerk of the City of Brea, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Brea held on the 17th day of June 2025, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

Dated: ______________________________
______________________________
City Clerk

ATTACHMENT B
1 | Page Shaded Projects = New FY 25 - 27 Projects

EXHIBIT A

GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE MATRIX
FISCAL YEAR 2025-27 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

PROJECT

NUMBER DESCRIPTION

COMMUNITY

DEVELOPMENT

COMMUNITY

RESOURCES
PUBLIC
SAFETY

STREET IMPROVEMENTS
7219 Traffic Calmin
g Improvements CD 2.3, 4.3, 6.4, 11.5 PS 3.1
7251 SR-57 Freeway/Lambert Road Interchange CD 10.1, 11.1, 11.6, 27.1, 28.1 CR 13.1 PS 3.1 7278 Imperial Hwy. and Berry St. Intersection Improvements CD 11.1, 11.6, 27.1, 27.2, 28.1 CR 13.1 PS 3.1 7299 Brea Boulevard Street Improvements CD 1.12, 11.1, 27.2 PS 3.1 7306 Imperial Hwy/SR-57 Interchange Improvements CD 10.3, 10.4, 10.5, 27.2 PS 3.1 7312 Cit ywide Slurr
y Seal Pro
gram CD 1.12, 27.2
7313 Cit
ywide Sidewalk Replacement CD 2.4, 13.2 PS 3.1
7322 Country Hills Subdivision Pavement/Water Rehabilitation CD 1.12, 11.1, 27.2 7326 Walnut Way Street Improvements CD 1.12, 11.1, 27.2 PS 3.1 7327 Central Avenue & State College Street Improvements CD 1.12, 11.1, 27.2 PS 3.1 7328 Brea Downtown Parklets Project CD 1.6, 4.5, 12.6 CR 1.1, 1.5, 3.4 7329 Birch Street Improvements S. Associated to Valencia CD 1.12, 11.1, 27.2 PS 3.1 7332 Citywide Street LED Upgrades CD 1.7, 1.12, 13.2, 27.2 PS 3.1 7333 Flower Avenue Street Improvements CD 1.12, 11.1, 27.2 7334 Palm Street Paving Improvements CD 1.12, 11.1, 27.2 7335 Birch Street Improvements Brea Blvd. to S. Associated Rd. CD 1.12, 11.1, 27.2 7336 Randolph Avenue Street Improvements CD 1.12, 11.1, 27.2 7337 Tanglewood Street Paving Improvements CD 1.12, 11.1, 27.2

STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS
7330 Storm Drain Master Plan CD 14.1 CR 12.2 PS 7.1,

7.2, 7.6
7952 Tracks Segment 3 Drainage Repairs CD 1.7, 13.1, 13.2

TRAFFIC SAFETY ENHANCEMENTS
7218 Traffic Signal Controller Upgrade CD 2.3, 4.3, 11.1 CR 13.1 7704 Emer genc
y Chan
geable Messa
ge Si
gns CR 13.1, 13.7 PS 1.4, 3.1

ATTACHMENT B
2 | Page Shaded Projects = New FY 25 - 27 Projects

PROJECT

NUMBER DESCRIPTION

COMMUNITY

DEVELOPMENT

COMMUNITY

RESOURCES
PUBLIC
SAFETY

TRAFFIC SAFETY ENHANCEMENTS (CONTINUED)
7716 Lambert Road Traffic Signal Synchronization CD 2.3, 10.3, 11.1, 11.6 CR 13.1 PS 1.2, 1.5 7717 Cliffwood Neighborhood Traffic Calming Improvements CD 2.3, 11.5 PS 3.1 7718 Transportation Improvement Nexus Pro gram Update CD 11.1, 11.2, 11.6, 27.2 CR 13.1 PS 3.1
7720 Kraemer Blvd. Re
gional Traffic Si
gnal S
ynchronization CD 2.3, 10.3, 11.1, 11.6 CR 13.1 PS 1.2, 1.5 7721 State College Blvd. Regional Traffic Signal
S
ynchronization
CD 2.3, 10.3, 11.1, 11.6 CR 13.1 PS 1.2, 1.5

WATER IMPROVEMENTS
7442 Miscellaneous Water Improvement Program CD 1.12, 14.2 7462 Enterprise Tract Water Improvements CD 1.12, 14.2 7465 Candlewood Tract Water Main Replacement CD 1.12, 14.2 7470 Carbon Can yon Booster No. 2 Improvements CD 1.12, 14.2
7471 Carbon Canyon Booster No. 3 Improvements CD 1.12, 14.2 7473 Valencia Reservoir Repainting CD 27.2 7476 N. Associated Rd. New Hi gh Pressure Water Line CD 1.12, 14.2
7479 Lotus Place Water Line Improvements CD 1.12, 14.2 7481 Brea Corsican Villas Water Line Improvements CD 1.12, 14.2 7482 Olinda Villa ge Water Line Improvements CD 1.12, 14.2
7483 Replace Generator at Berr
y Street Booster Pump Station CD 1.12, 14.2
7494 Thompson Oil Site H
ydrant Improvements CD 1.12, 14.2
7495 Berry Street Reservoir Booster Pump No. 7 CD 1.12, 14.2 7496 790 Zone Reservoir Improvements CD 1.12, 14.2

SEWER IMPROVEMENTS
7617 Sewer Mainline Relinin
g CD 1.12, 14.2
7629 Randolph Ave & Imperial Hwy Sewer Capacity
Improvements
CD 14.2
7631 Briarwood Lift Station Replacement CD 1.12, 14.2 7632 Carbon Canyon Access Road Phase 1-3 CD 14.2 7633 Brea Creek Siphon S-2 Anal ysis CD 14.2

FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS
7923 Fire Station No. 1 Seismic Up
grades CD 1.12
7936 City Facility & Median Landscape Improvements CD 14.2 CR 11.4, 11.5,

12.2 ATTACHMENT B
3 | Page Shaded Projects = New FY 25 - 27 Projects

PROJECT

NUMBER DESCRIPTION

COMMUNITY

DEVELOPMENT

COMMUNITY

RESOURCES

PUBLIC SAFETY

FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS (CONTINUED)
7946 Western Extension to the Tracks at Brea CD 1.7, 11.3, 12.5, 13 CR 1.6, 3.5, 6.3,

7.1, 7.3, 13.5
7956 Tamarack Parkin
g Lot Asphalt Rehabilitation CD 1.12
7970 Cit
ywide HVAC Improvements CD 27.2
7974 Citywide Elevator Improvements CD 27.2 7975 Senior Center & Pioneer Hall Roofs CD 27.2 7978 Arovista Park Modernization Project CD 1.12, 27.2 7979 Mechanical Up grades to Cit
y Facilities CD 27.2
7982 Police Department Dispatch & Comm Dev Renovation
Project
CD 27.2 PS 1.1
7983 GIS Record Document Conversion CD 1.12, 14.1, 23.6 PS 1.12 7984 Brea Gallery Li ghtin
g Up
grades CD 27.2 PS 2.2, 2.3
7985 Brea Senior Center Improvement Project CD 1.12, 3.2 CR 1.1, 1.2 7986 Western Park Amenity Improvements CD 1.12, 27.2 CR 1.1, 1.2 7987 Western Park Restroom Up grades CD 1.12, 27.2 CR 1.1, 1.2
7988 Tracks Amenit
y Improvements CD 13.1, 13.2 CR 1.1 PS 1.8, 1.9
7989 Veterans Memorial Hardscape Improvements CR 14.8, 15.3 7991 Fire Station No. 2 Dispatch Center Up grade CD 27.2 PS 1.2, 1.4
7992 Police Department Space Plan Improvements PS 1.1, 1.2 7719 Brea PD Integrated Crime Center (ICC) Citywide Camera Networ
k
PS 1.1,

1.2, 1.8
7995 Senior Center Pavin
g Improvements CD 1.12, 27.2
7996 Brea Downtown Paint Improvements CD 1.12, 27.2 7997 Wildcatters Park Storage Building Improvements CD 1.12, 27.2 7998 Public Works Standard Plans Update CD 11.3, 13.2, 14.2, 15.3

GOLF COURSE IMPROVEMENTS
7968 Facilit
y Improvements at Birch Hills Golf Course CD 27.2 CR 2.1 7969 Facility Improvements at Brea Creek Golf Course CD 27.2 CR 2.1

ATTACHMENT C
Project Environmental Clearance Status
1 | Page * Shaded Projects = New Projects in FY 25-27
Section I – Environmental Findings Completed/Recorded
Categorical Exempt Projects Section 15301
7218 Traffic Signal Controller Upgrade Class 1
7219 Traffic Calming Improvements Class 1
7299 Brea Boulevard Street Improvements Class 1
7312 Citywide Slurry Seal Program Class 1 (c)
7313 Citywide Sidewalk Replacement Class 1 (c)
7322 Country Hills Subdivision Pavement/Water Rehabilitation Class 1 7326 Walnut Way Street Improvements Class 1 (b)(c)
7327 Central Avenue & State College Street Improvements Class 1 (c) 7329 Birch Street Improvements S. Associated to Valencia Class 1 (c) 7330 Storm Drain Master Plan Class 1 (c)
7442 Miscellaneous Water Improvement Program Class 1
7462 Enterprise Tract Water Improvements Class 1
7465 Candlewood Tract Water Main Replacement Class 1
7470 Carbon Canyon Booster No. 2 Improvements Class 1 (c) 7473 Valencia Reservoir Repainting Class 1 (d)
7483 Replace Generator at Berry Street Booster Pump Station Class 1 (b) 7617 Sewer Mainline Relining Class 1 (b)
7629 Randolph Ave & Imperial Hwy Sewer Capacity Improvements Class 1 (b) 7704 Emergency Changeable Message Signs Class 1 (d)
7716 Lambert Road Traffic Signal Synchronization Class 1 (d) 7717 Cliffwood Neighborhood Traffic Calming Improvements Class 1 (c)(d) 7923 Fire Station No. 1 Seismic Upgrades Class 1 (d)
7956 Tamarack Parking Lot Asphalt Rehabilitation Class 1 (c) 7968 Facility Improvements at Birch Hills Golf Course Class 1 (d) 7969 Facility Improvments at Brea Creek Golf Course Class 1 (a)(d) 7970 Citywide HVAC Improvements Class 1 (a)(d)
7974 Citywide Elevator Improvements Class 1 (a)(d)
7975 Senior Center & Pioneer Hall Roofs Class 1 (a)
7982 Police Department Dispatch & Comm Dev Renovation Project Class 1 (a) Categorical Exempt Projects Section 15302
7476 N. Associated Rd. New High Pressure Water Line Class 2 (c) 7479 Lotus Place Water Line Improvements Class 2 (c)
7481 Brea Corsican Villas Water Line Improvements Class 2 (c) 7482 Olinda Village Water Line Improvements Class 2 (c) 7631 Briarwood Lift Station Replacement Class 2 (c)
7979 Mechanical Upgrades to City Facilities Class 2 (c)

Categorical Exempt Projects Section 15303
7278 Imperial Hwy. and Berry St. Intersection Improvements Class 1 (d) 7328 Brea Downtown Parklets Project
7471 Carbon Canyon Booster No. 3 Improvements Class 3 (d) 7978 Arovista Park Modernization Project Class 1 (e)

ATTACHMENT C
Project Environmental Clearance Status
2 | Page * Shaded Projects = New Projects in FY 25-27
Categorical Exempt Projects Section 15304
7936 City Facility & Median Landscape Improvements Class 4 (b) 7946 Western Extension to the Tracks at Brea Class 4 (h) 7952 Tracks Segment 3 Drainage Repairs Class 4 (b)
Categorical Exempt Projects Section 15306
7983 GIS Record Document Conversion Class 6
Statutory Exemption Section 15262
7633 Brea Creek Siphon S-2 Analysis
Mitigated Negative Declaration
7251 SR-57 Freeway / Lambert Road Interchange
Section II – Environmental Findings To Be Completed/Recorded 7306 Imperial Hwy/SR-57 Interchange Improvements
7332 Citywide Street Light LED Upgrades
7632 Carbon Canyon Access Road Phase 1-3
7718 Transportation Improvement Nexus Program Update
7984 Brea Gallery Lighting Upgrades
7985 Brea Senior Center Improvement Project
7986 Western Park Amenity Improvements
7987 Western Park Restroom Upgrades
7988 Tracks Amenity Improvements
7989 Veterans Memorial Hardscape Improvements
7991 Fire Station No. 2 Dispatch Center Upgrade
7992 Police Department Space Plan Improvements
7333 Flower Avenue Street Improvements
7334 Palm Street Paving Improvements
7335 Birch Street Improvements Brea Blvd. to S. Associated Rd. 7336 Randolph Avenue Street Improvements
7337 Tanglewood Street Paving Improvements
7720 Kraemer Blvd. Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization 7721 State College Blvd. Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization 7494 Thompson Oil Site Hydrant Improvements
7495 Berry Street Reservoir Booster Pump No. 7
7496 790 Zone Reservoir Improvements
7719 Brea PD Integrated Crime Center (ICC) Citywide Camera Network 7995 Senior Center Paving Improvements
7996 Brea Downtown Paint Improvements
7997 Wildcatters Park Storage Building Improvements
7998 Public Works Standard Plans Update
PROJECT NAME Proposed
2025-26
Proposed
2026-27
Proposed
2027-28
Proposed
2028-29
Proposed
2029-30
Proposed
2030-31
Proposed
2031-32
Street Improvements
7219 Traffic Calming Improvements $ 150,000 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 7251 SR-57 Freeway/Lambert Road Interchange $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 7278 Imperial Hwy. and Berry St. Intersection Improvements $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 7299 Brea Boulevard Street Improvements $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 7306 Imperial Hwy/SR-57 Interchange Improvements $ - - $ 500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 7312 Citywide Slurry Seal Program $ 300,000 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 7313 Citywide Sidewalk Replacement $ 200,000 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 7322 Country Hills Subdivision Pavement/Water Rehabilitation $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 7326 Walnut Way Street Improvements $ - 400,000 $ 700,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 7327 Central Avenue & State College Street Improvements $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,500,000 $ 7328 Brea Downtown Parklets Project $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 7329 Birch Street Improvements S. Associated to Valencia $ - 500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 2,750,000 $ - $ 7332 Citywide Street Light LED Upgrades $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 975,000 $ 7333 Flower Avenue Street Improvements $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 7334 Palm Street Paving Improvements $ - 1,300,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 7335 Birch Street Improvements Brea Blvd. to S. Associated Rd. $ - - $ - $ 2,750,000 $ 2,750,000 $ - $ - $ 7336 Randolph Avenue Street Improvements $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,500,000 $ 7337 Tanglewood Street Paving Improvements $ - 500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ 650,000 3,350,000 $ 1,850,000 $ 3,400,000 $ 3,400,000 $ 3,400,000 $ 4,625,000 $ Storm Drain Improvements
7330 Storm Drain Master Plan $ - 350,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 7952 Tracks Segment 3 Drainage Repairs $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - 350,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
Traffic Safety Enhancements
7218 Traffic Signal Controller Upgrade $ 150,000 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 7704 Emergency Changeable Message Signs $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 7716 Lambert Road Traffic Signal Synchronization $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 7717 Cliffwood Neighborhood Traffic Calming Improvements $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 7718 Transportation Improvement Nexus Program Update $ - 25,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 7720 Kraemer Blvd. Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization $ - 220,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 7721 State College Blvd. Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization $ - 200,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Traffic Safety Enhancements Totals $ 150,000 595,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ Street Improvement Totals
Storm Drain Improvement Totals
PROJECT NAME Proposed
2025-26
Proposed
2026-27
Proposed
2027-28
Proposed
2028-29
Proposed
2029-30
Proposed
2030-31
Proposed
2031-32
Water Improvements
7442 Miscellaneous Water Improvement Program 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 7462 Enterprise Tract Water Improvements $ - - $ 4,450,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 7465 Candlewood Tract Water Main Replacement 10,000 $ - $ - $ 4,400,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 7470 Carbon Canyon Booster No. 2 Improvements 2,000,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 7471 Construct Enclosure for Booster Station No. 3 $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 7473 Valencia Reservoir Repainting $ 3,200,000 - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 7476 N. Associated Rd. New High Pressure Water Line - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 7479 Lotus Place Water Line Improvements $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ 3,850,000 $ - $ 7481 Brea Corsican Villas Water Line Improvements - $ - $ - $ - $ 360,000 $ - $ - $ 7482 Olinda Village Water Line Improvements 150,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 7483 Replace Generator at Berry Street Booster Pump Station 200,000 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 7494 Thompson Oil Site Hydrant Improvements 200,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 7495 Berry Street Reservoir Booster Pump No. 7 $ - - $ - $ 300,000 $ 3,000,000 $ - $ - $ 7496 790 Zone Reservoir Improvements $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 500,000 $ $ 3,900,000 2,760,000 $ 5,150,000 $ 4,900,000 $ 3,560,000 $ 4,050,000 $ 700,000 $ 7617 Sewer Mainline Relining $ 600,000 600,000 $ 600,000 $ 600,000 $ 600,000 $ 600,000 $ 600,000 $ 7629 Randolph Ave & Imperial Hwy Sewer Capacity Improvements - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 65,000 $ 690,000 $ 7631 Briarwood Lift Station Replacement $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 7632 Carbon Canyon Access Road Phase 1-3 30,000 $ 300,000 $ 350,000 $ 350,000 $ 900,000 $ 900,000 $ 900,000 $ 7633 Brea Creek Siphon S-2 Analysis $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ 900,000 630,000 $ 950,000 $ 950,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 1,565,000 $ 2,190,000 $ Sewer Improvements
Water Improvement Totals
Sewer Improvement Totals
PROJECT NAME Proposed
2025-26
Proposed
2026-27
Proposed
2027-28
Proposed
2028-29
Proposed
2029-30
Proposed
2030-31
Proposed
2031-32
Facility Improvements
7719 Brea PD Integrated Crime Center (ICC) Citywide Camera Network $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 7923 Fire Station No. 1 Seismic Upgrades $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 7936 City Facility & Median Landscape Improvements $ - - $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 7946 Western Extension to the Tracks at Brea $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 7956 Tamarack Parking Lot Asphalt Rehabilitation $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 7970 Citywide HVAC Improvements $ - 100,000 $ 100,000 $ - $ 100,000 $ - $ 100,000 $ 7974 Citywide Elevator Improvements $ - 200,000 $ - $ 200,000 $ - $ - $ 200,000 $ 7975 Senior Center & Pioneer Hall Roofs $ - 350,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 7978 Arovista Park Modernization Project $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 7979 Mechanical Upgrades to City Facilities $ - 150,000 $ - $ 150,000 $ - $ - $ 150,000 $ 7983 GIS Record Document Conversion $ 50,000 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 7984 Brea Gallery Lighting Upgrades $ - - $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 7985 Brea Senior Center Improvement Project $ - - $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 7986 Western Park Amenity Improvements $ - - $ 225,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 7987 Western Park Restroom Upgrades $ - - $ 825,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 7988 Tracks Amenity Improvements $ - - $ - $ 310,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 7989 Veterans Memorial Hardscape Improvements $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 7990 Olinda Oil Museum Drainage & Landscape Improvements $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 7991 Fire Station No. 2 Dispatch Center Upgrade $ - - $ 60,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 7992 Police Department Space Plan Improvements $ - 200,000 $ 1,000,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 7995 Senior Center Paving Improvements $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 7996 Brea Downtown Paint Improvements $ - 250,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 7997 Wildcatters Park Storage Building Improvements $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 7998 Public Works Standard Plans Update $ - 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ 50,000 1,400,000 $ 2,760,000 $ 1,110,000 $ 300,000 $ 200,000 $ 650,000 $ 7968 Facility Improvements at Birch Hills Golf Course $ 200,000 200,000 $ - $ 225,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 7969 Facility Improvements at Brea Creek Golf Course $ - - $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ $ 200,000 200,000 $ 50,000 $ 275,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ $ 5,850,000 9,285,000 $ 10,910,000 $ 10,785,000 $ 8,960,000 $ 9,415,000 $ 8,365,000 $ Golf Course Improvements
Facility Improvement Totals
Golf Course Improvement Totals
Grand Total
FUNDING SOURCES Proposed
2025-26
Proposed
2026-27
Proposed
2027-28
Proposed
2028-29
Proposed
2029-30
Proposed
2030-31
Proposed
2031-32
FUNDS
FUND 110 (GENERAL) $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
FUND 140 (C.B.E.D.) $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
FUND 172 (PUBLIC SAFETY AUGMENTATION)$ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ FUND 182 (FARP) $ - 900,000 $ 2,385,000 $ 735,000 $ 175,000 $ 75,000 $ 525,000 $ FUND 220 (GAS TAX) $ 350,000 890,000 $ 1,025,000 $ 1,225,000 $ 425,000 $ 575,000 $ 2,150,000 $ FUND 221 (RMRA) $ - 250,000 $ - $ 1,375,000 $ 1,375,000 $ 1,375,000 $ 750,000 $ FUND 240 (AQMD) $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
FUND 250 (PARK) $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
FUND 260 (MEASURE M) 2,060,000 $ 400,000 $ 1,450,000 $ 1,775,000 $ 1,775,000 $ 1,975,000 $ 1,900,000 $ FUND 290 (CDBG) $ - - $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ - $ - $ - $ FUND 410 (URBAN RUNOFF) $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
FUND 420 (WATER) $ 3,950,000 2,860,000 $ 4,250,000 $ 4,150,000 $ 3,610,000 $ 3,750,000 $ 750,000 $ FUND 430 (SEWER) $ 900,000 1,080,000 $ 950,000 $ 950,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 1,565,000 $ 2,190,000 $ FUND 440 (SANITATION) $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
FUND 465 (GOLF BIRCH) 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 50,000 $ 275,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ FUND 480 (VEHICLE & EQUIP MAINT) - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ FUND 490 (BUILDING) $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
FUND 510 (CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT) - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ FUND 540 (TRAFFIC IMPACT) 495,000 $ 50,000 $ 550,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ FUND 541 (WATER IMPACT) $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
FUND 542 (FIRE IMPACT) $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
FUND 543 (DISPATCH IMPACT) - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
FUND 550 (STORM DRAIN) 350,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ FUND 560 (CAPITAL/MITIGATION) - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ TOTAL 9,085,000 $ 5,850,000 $ 10,910,000 $ 10,785,000 $ 8,960,000 $ 9,415,000 $ 8,365,000 $ GRANTS AND OTHER FUNDING SOURCES (MISC.)
FEDERAL GRANTS $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
STATE GRANTS $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
COUNTY GRANTS $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
OTHER (FUNDED) $ - 200,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
OTHER (UNFUNDED) $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
TOTAL 200,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
GRAND TOTAL $ 9,285,000 $ 5,850,000 $ 10,910,000 $ 10,785,000 $ 8,960,000 $ 9,415,000 $ 8,365,000

SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES BY FUND
110 140 182 220 221 240 250 260 290 410 420 430 440 465 490 540 560 Federal State County Other Funded Total 7219 Traffic Calming Improvements $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 110,902 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 110,902 $ 7251 SR-57 Freeway/Lambert Road Interchange $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,072,594 $ - $ - $ - $ 5,376,036 $ - $ 6,448,630 $ 7278 Imperial Hwy. and Berry St. Intersection Improvements $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 33,462 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 33,462 $ 7299 Brea Boulevard Street Improvements $ - - $ - $ 471,911 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 471,911 $ 7306 Imperial Hwy/SR-57 Interchange Improvements $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 476,150 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 734,066 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,210,216 $ 7312 Citywide Slurry Seal Program $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 392,084 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 392,084 $ 7313 Citywide Sidewalk Replacement $ - - $ - $ 132,717 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 132,717 $ 7322 Country Hills Subdivision Pavement/Water Rehabilitation $ - - $ - $ 144,766 $ - $ - $ - $ 300,000 $ - $ - $ 132,636 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 577,402 $ 7326 Walnut Way Street Improvements $ - - $ - $ 31,327 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 314,028 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 345,355 $ 7327 Central Avenue & State College Street Improvements $ - - $ - $ 498,735 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 14,618 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 513,353 $ 7328 Brea Downtown Parklets Project $ 396,419 - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 396,419 $ 7329 Birch Street Improvements S. Associated to Valencia $ - - $ - $ - $ 3,592,406 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 3,592,406 $ 7333 Flower Avenue Street Improvements $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ - $ 396,419 $ - $ 1,279,456 $ 3,592,406 $ - $ - $ 1,279,136 $ - $ - $ 147,254 $ 314,028 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,840,122 $ - $ - $ - $ 5,376,036 $ 25,000 $ 14,249,857 110 140 182 220 221 240 250 260 290 410 420 430 440 465 490 540 560 Federal State County Other Funded Total 7952 Tracks Segment 3 Drainage Repairs $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 694 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 42,808 $ 43,502 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 694 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 42,808 $ 43,502 110 140 182 220 221 240 250 260 290 410 420 430 440 465 490 540 560 Federal State County Other Funded Total 7218 Traffic Signal Controller Upgrade $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 59,180 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 159,180 $ 7704 Emergency Changeable Message Signs $ - - $ - $ 157,672 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 157,672 $ 7716 Lambert Road Traffic Signal Synchronization $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 398,583 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 398,583 $ 7717 Cliffwood Neighborhood Traffic Calming Improvements $ - - $ - $ 8,380 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 8,380 $ 7718 Transportation Improvement Nexus Program Update $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 124,883 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 124,883 $ - $ - $ - $ 166,052 $ - $ - $ - $ 59,180 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 623,466 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 848,698 110 140 182 220 221 240 250 260 290 410 420 430 440 465 490 540 560 Federal State County Other Funded Total 7442 Miscellaneous Water Improvement Program $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 203,954 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 203,954 $ 7462 Enterprise Tract Water Improvements $ - - $ - $ - $ 5,060 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 17,120 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 22,180 $ 7465 Candlewood Tract Water Main Replacement $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 21,703 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 21,703 $ 7470 Carbon Canyon Booster No. 2 Improvements $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 517,690 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 517,690 $ 7471 Carbon Canyon Booster No. 3 Improvements $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 35,350 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 35,350 $ 7473 Valencia Reservoir Repainting $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,777,052 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,777,052 $ 7476 N. Associated Rd. New High Pressure Water Line $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 721,764 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 721,764 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 5,060 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 3,294,633 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 3,299,693 110 140 182 220 221 240 250 260 290 410 420 430 440 465 490 540 560 Federal State County Other Funded Total 7617 Sewer Mainline Relining $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 543,463 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 543,463 $ 7631 Briarwood Lift Station Replacement $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,342,090 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,342,090 $ 7632 Carbon Canyon Access Road Phase 1-3 $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 336,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 336,000 $ 7633 Brea Creek Siphon S-2 Analysis $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 394,142 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 394,142 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,615,696 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,615,696 110 140 182 220 221 240 250 260 290 410 420 430 440 465 490 540 560 Federal State County Other Funded Total 7719 Brea PD Integrated Crime Center (ICC) Citywide Camera Network $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,808,171 $ - $ - $ 1,808,171 $ 7923 Fire Station No. 1 Seismic Upgrades $ - - $ 69,302 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 69,302 $ 7936 City Facility & Median Landscape Improvements $ - - $ 1,091 $ 75,000 $ - $ - $ 13,263 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 89,354 $ 7946 Western Extension to the Tracks at Brea $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 841,220 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,019,931 $ 3,427,844 $ - $ - $ 6,288,995 $ 7956 Tamarack Parking Lot Asphalt Rehabilitation $ - - $ 408,959 $ 200,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 608,959 $ 7978 Arovista Park Modernization Project $ 3,449,059 6,331,684 $ 1,298,982 $ 130,000 $ - $ 590,000 $ 1,203,000 $ - $ - $ 182,611 $ 852,850 $ 31,378 $ 95,000 $ - $ 450,000 $ - $ 1,321,949 $ - $ 220,000 $ 250,000 $ - $ 16,406,512 $ 7982 Police Department Dispatch & Comm Dev Renovation Project $ - - $ 50,936 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 50,936 $ 7983 GIS Record Document Conversion $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 50,222 $ 99,221 $ 97,191 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 246,634 $ 7985 Brea Senior Center Improvement Project $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 150,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 150,000 $ 7987 Western Park Restroom Upgrades $ - - $ 940,752 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 940,752 $ 7989 Veterans Memorial Hardscape Improvements $ - - $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 50,000 $ 7995 Senior Center Paving Improvements $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 146,850 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 146,850 $ 6,331,684 $ 3,449,059 $ 2,820,022 $ 405,000 $ - $ 590,000 $ 2,057,483 $ - $ 296,850 $ 232,833 $ 952,071 $ 128,568 $ 95,000 $ - $ 450,000 $ - $ 1,321,949 $ 2,019,931 $ 5,456,015 $ 250,000 $ - $ 26,856,464 110 140 182 220 221 240 250 260 290 410 420 430 440 465 490 540 560 Federal State County Other Funded Total 7968 Facility Improvements at Birch Hills Golf Course $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 135,340 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 135,340 $ 7969 Facility Improvements at Brea Creek Golf Course $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 140,888 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 140,888 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 276,228 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 276,228 $ 3,845,478 6,331,684 $ 2,820,022 $ 1,850,508 $ 3,597,466 $ 590,000 $ 2,057,483 $ 1,338,315 $ 296,850 $ 233,527 $ 4,393,958 $ 3,058,292 $ 95,000 $ 276,228 $ 450,000 $ 2,463,588 $ 1,321,949 $ 2,019,931 $ 5,456,015 $ 5,626,036 $ 67,808 $ 48,190,138 $

WATER IMPROVEMENTS
2024-25 CARRYOVER BY FUND

STREET IMPROVEMENTS
Street Improvement Totals

TRAFFIC SAFETY ENHANCEMENTS
Traffic Safety Improvement Totals

STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS
Storm Drain Improvement Totals
Golf Course Improvement Totals
TOTAL
Water Improvement Totals

SEWER IMPROVEMENTS
Sewer Improvement Totals

FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS
Facility Improvement Totals

GOLF COURSE IMPROVEMENTS
182 220 221 260 420 430 465 540 550 Other Funded Total
7219 Traffic Calming Improvements $ 150,000 - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 150,000 $ 7312 Citywide Slurry Seal Program $ - - $ - $ 300,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 300,000 $ 7313 Citywide Sidewalk Replacement $ 200,000 - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 200,000 $ 7326 Walnut Way Street Improvements $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ 400,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 400,000 $ 7329 Birch Street Improvements S. Associated to Valencia $ - - $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 500,000 $ 7334 Palm Street Paving Improvements $ 390,000 - $ - $ 910,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,300,000 $ 7337 Tanglewood Street Paving Improvements $ - $ - $ - $ 500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 500,000 $ - $ 740,000 $ 250,000 $ 1,960,000 $ - $ 400,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 3,350,000 182 220 221 260 420 430 465 540 550 Other Funded Total
7330 Storm Drain Master Plan $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 350,000 $ - $ 350,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 350,000 $ - $ 350,000 182 220 221 260 420 430 465 540 550 Other Funded Total
7218 Traffic Signal Controller Upgrade $ - - $ - $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ 150,000 $ 7718 Transportation Improvement Nexus Program Update $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 25,000 $ - $ - $ 25,000 $ 7720 Kraemer Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 220,000 $ - $ - $ 220,000 $ 7721 State College Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 200,000 $ - $ - $ 200,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 495,000 $ - $ - $ 595,000 182 220 221 260 420 430 465 540 550 Other Funded Total
7442 Miscellaneous Water Improvement Program $ - - $ - $ - $ 200,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 200,000 $ 7465 Candlewood Tract Water Main Replacement $ - - $ - $ - $ 10,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 10,000 $ 7470 Carbon Canyon Booster No. 2 Improvements $ - - $ - $ - $ 2,000,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,000,000 $ 7482 Olinda Village Water Line Improvements $ - - $ - $ - $ 150,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 150,000 $ 7483 Replace Generator at Berry Street Booster Pump Station $ - - $ - $ - $ 200,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 200,000 $ 7494 Thompson Oil Site Hydrant Improvements $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 200,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 200,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,760,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,760,000 182 220 221 260 420 430 465 540 550 Other Funded Total
7617 Sewer Mainline Relining $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ 600,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 600,000 $ 7632 Carbon Canyon Access Road Phase 1-3 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 30,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 30,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 630,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 630,000 182 220 221 260 420 430 465 540 550 Other Funded Total
7970 Citywide HVAC Improvements $ - 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000 $ 7974 Citywide Elevator Improvements $ - 200,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 200,000 $ 7975 Senior Center & Pioneer Hall Roofs $ - 350,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 350,000 $ 7979 Mechanical Upgrades to City Facilities $ - 150,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 150,000 $ 7983 GIS Record Document Conversion $ - - $ - $ - $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 50,000 $ 7992 Police Department Space Plan Improvements $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 7996 Brea Downtown Paint Improvements $ 150,000 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 250,000 $ 7998 Public Works Standard Plans Update $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000 $ 900,000 $ 150,000 $ - $ - $ 100,000 $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 200,000 $ 1,400,000 182 220 221 260 420 430 465 540 550 Other Funded Total
7968 Facility Improvements at Birch Hills Golf Course $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 200,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 200,000 $ $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 200,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 200,000 TOTAL $ 890,000 900,000 $ 250,000 $ 2,060,000 $ 2,860,000 $ 1,080,000 $ 200,000 $ 495,000 $ 350,000 $ 200,000 $ 9,285,000 $ 2025-26 EXPENDITURE BY FUND
Street Improvement Totals

TRAFFIC SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS
Traffic Safety Enhancement Totals

FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS

WATER IMPROVEMENTS

STREET IMPROVEMENTS
Facility Improvement Totals

GOLF COURSE IMPROVEMENTS
Golf Course Improvement Totals
Water Improvement Totals

SEWER IMPROVEMENTS
Sewer Improvement Totals

STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS
Storm Drain Improvement Totals
220 260 420 430 465 540 Total
7219 Traffic Calming Improvements $ - 150,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 150,000 $ 7312 Citywide Slurry Seal Program $ 300,000 - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 300,000 $ 7313 Citywide Sidewalk Replacement $ 200,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 200,000 $ 350,000 $ 300,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 650,000
220 260 420 430 465 540 Total
7218 Traffic Signal Controller Upgrade $ - $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 50,000 $ 150,000 $ - $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 50,000 $ 150,000
220 260 420 430 465 540 Total
7442 Miscellaneous Water Improvement Program $ - - $ 200,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 200,000 $ 7473 Valencia Reservoir Repainting $ - - $ 3,200,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 3,200,000 $ 7483 Replace Generator at Berry Street Booster Pump Station $ - $ - $ 500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 500,000 $ - $ - $ 3,900,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 3,900,000
220 260 420 430 465 540 Total
7617 Sewer Mainline Relining $ - - $ - $ 600,000 $ - $ - $ 600,000 $ 7632 Carbon Canyon Access Road Phase 1-3 $ - $ - $ - $ 300,000 $ - $ - $ 300,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 900,000 $ - $ - $ 900,000
220 260 420 430 465 540 Total
7983 GIS Record Document Conversion $ - $ - $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 50,000
220 260 420 430 465 540 Total
7968 Facility Improvements at Birch Hills Golf Course $ - - $ - $ - $ 200,000 $ - $ 200,000 $ $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 200,000 $ - $ 200,000
$ 400,000 350,000 $ 3,950,000 $ 900,000 $ 200,000 $ 50,000 $ 5,850,000 $ 2026-27 EXPENDITURE BY FUND
Golf Course Improvement Totals
TOTAL
Traffic Safety Enhancement Totals
Water Improvement Totals

SEWER IMPROVEMENTS
Sewer Improvement Totals

TRAFFIC SAFETY ENHANCEMENTS

WATER IMPROVEMENTS
Facility Improvement Totals

GOLF COURSE IMPROVEMENT TOTALS

STREET IMPROVEMENTS
Street Improvement Totals

FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS
182 220 260 290 420 430 465 540 Total
7219 Traffic Calming Improvements $ 150,000 - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 150,000 $ 7306 Imperial Hwy/SR-57 Interchange Improvements $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ 7312 Citywide Slurry Seal Program $ - - $ 300,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 300,000 $ 7313 Citywide Sidewalk Replacement $ 200,000 - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 200,000 $ 7326 Walnut Way Street Improvements $ - $ 200,000 $ 500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 700,000 $ - $ 550,000 $ 800,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 500,000 $ 1,850,000 182 220 260 290 420 430 465 540 Total
7218 Traffic Signal Controller Upgrade $ - $ - $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 50,000 $ 150,000 $ - $ - $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 50,000 $ 150,000
182 220 260 290 420 430 465 540 Total
7442 Miscellaneous Water Improvement Program $ - - $ - $ - $ 200,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 200,000 $ 7462 Enterprise Tract Water Improvements $ 400,000 - $ 550,000 $ - $ 3,500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 4,450,000 $ 7483 Replace Generator at Berry Street Booster Pump Station $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 500,000 $ - $ 400,000 $ 550,000 $ - $ 4,200,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 5,150,000 182 220 260 290 420 430 465 540 Total
7617 Sewer Mainline Relining $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ 600,000 $ - $ - $ 600,000 $ 7632 Carbon Canyon Access Road Phase 1-3 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 350,000 $ - $ - $ 350,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 950,000 $ - $ - $ 950,000
182 220 260 290 420 430 465 540 Total
7936 City Facility & Median Landscape Improvements $ 75,000 75,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 150,000 $ 7970 Citywide HVAC Improvements $ - 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000 $ 7983 GIS Record Document Conversion $ - - $ - $ - $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 50,000 $ 7984 Brea Gallery Lighting Upgrades $ - 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000 $ 7985 Brea Senior Center Improvement Project $ - - $ - $ 250,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 250,000 $ 7986 Western Park Amenity Improvements $ - 225,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 225,000 $ 7987 Western Park Restroom Upgrades $ - 825,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 825,000 $ 7991 Fire Station No. 2 Dispatch Center Upgrade $ - 60,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 60,000 $ 7992 Police Department Space Plan Improvements $ 1,000,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,000,000 $ 2,385,000 $ 75,000 $ - $ 250,000 $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 2,760,000 182 220 260 290 420 430 465 540 Total
7969 Facility Improvements at Brea Creek Golf Course $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 50,000 $ - $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 50,000 $ - $ 50,000
$ 1,025,000 2,385,000 $ 1,450,000 $ 250,000 $ 4,250,000 $ 950,000 $ 50,000 $ 550,000 $ 10,910,000 $ 2027-28 EXPENDITURE BY FUND
TOTAL
Facility Improvement Totals

GOLF COURSE IMPROVEMENTS
Golf Course Improvement Totals

STREET IMPROVEMENTS
Street Improvement Totals

WATER IMPROVEMENTS
Water Improvement Totals

SEWER IMPROVEMENTS
Sewer Improvement Totals

TRAFFIC SAFETY ENHANCEMENTS
Traffic Safety Enhancement Totals

FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS
182 220 221 260 290 420 430 465 540 Total
7219 Traffic Calming Improvements $ 150,000 - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 150,000 $ 7312 Citywide Slurry Seal Program $ - - $ - $ 300,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 300,000 $ 7313 Citywide Sidewalk Replacement $ 200,000 - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 200,000 $ 7335 Birch Street Improvements Brea Blvd. to S. Associated Rd. $ - $ - $ 1,375,000 $ 1,375,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,750,000 $ - $ 350,000 $ 1,375,000 $ 1,675,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 3,400,000 182 220 221 260 290 420 430 465 540 Total
7218 Traffic Signal Controller Upgrade $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 50,000 $ 150,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 50,000 $ 150,000 182 220 221 260 290 420 430 465 540 Total
7442 Miscellaneous Water Improvement Program $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ 200,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 200,000 $ 7465 Candlewood Tract Water Main Replacement $ 800,000 - $ - $ - $ - $ 3,600,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 4,400,000 $ 7495 Berry Street Reservoir Booster Pump No. 7 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 300,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 300,000 $ - $ 800,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 4,100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 4,900,000 182 220 221 260 290 420 430 465 540 Total
7617 Sewer Mainline Relining $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 600,000 $ - $ - $ 600,000 $ 7632 Carbon Canyon Access Road Phase 1-3 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 350,000 $ - $ - $ 350,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 950,000 $ - $ - $ 950,000
182 220 221 260 290 420 430 465 540 Total
7936 City Facility & Median Landscape Improvements $ 75,000 75,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 150,000 $ 7974 Citywide Elevator Improvements $ - 200,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 200,000 $ 7979 Mechanical Upgrades to City Facilities $ - 150,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 150,000 $ 7983 GIS Record Document Conversion $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 50,000 $ 7985 Brea Senior Center Improvement Project $ - - $ - $ - $ 250,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 250,000 $ 7988 Tracks Amenity Improvements $ 310,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 310,000 $ 735,000 $ 75,000 $ - $ - $ 250,000 $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,110,000 182 220 221 260 290 420 430 465 540 Total
7968 Facility Improvements at Birch Hills Golf Course $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 225,000 $ - $ 225,000 $ 7969 Facility Improvements at Brea Creek Golf Course $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 50,000 $ - $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 275,000 $ - $ 275,000
$ 1,225,000 735,000 $ 1,375,000 $ 1,775,000 $ 250,000 $ 4,150,000 $ 950,000 $ 275,000 $ 50,000 $ 10,785,000 $ 2028-29 EXPENDITURE BY FUND

STREET IMPROVEMENTS
Street Improvement Totals

WATER IMPROVEMENTS
TOTAL
Water Improvement Totals

SEWER IMPROVEMENTS
Sewer Improvement Totals

TRAFFIC SAFETY ENHANCEMENTS
Traffic Safety Enhancement Totals
Golf Course Improvement Totals
Facility Improvement Totals

GOLF COURSE IMPROVEMENTS

FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS
182 220 221 260 420 430 465 540 Total
7219 Traffic Calming Improvements $ 150,000 - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 150,000 $ 7312 Citywide Slurry Seal Program $ - - $ - $ 300,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 300,000 $ 7313 Citywide Sidewalk Replacement $ 200,000 - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 200,000 $ 7335 Birch Street Improvements Brea Blvd. to S. Associated Rd. $ - $ - $ 1,375,000 $ 1,375,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,750,000 $ - $ 350,000 $ 1,375,000 $ 1,675,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 3,400,000 182 220 221 260 420 430 465 540 Total
7218 Traffic Signal Controller Upgrade $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 50,000 $ 150,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 50,000 $ 150,000
182 220 221 260 420 430 465 540 Total
7442 Miscellaneous Water Improvement Program $ - - $ - $ - $ 200,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 200,000 $ 7481 Brea Corsican Villas Water Line Improvements $ - - $ - $ - $ 360,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 360,000 $ 7495 Berry Street Reservoir Booster Pump No. 7 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 3,000,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 3,000,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 3,560,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 3,560,000
182 220 221 260 420 430 465 540 Total
7617 Sewer Mainline Relining $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ 600,000 $ - $ - $ 600,000 $ 7632 Carbon Canyon Access Road Phase 1-3 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 900,000 $ - $ - $ 900,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,500,000 $ - $ - $ 1,500,000
182 220 221 260 420 430 465 540 Total
7936 City Facility & Median Landscape Improvements $ 75,000 75,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 150,000 $ 7970 Citywide HVAC Improvements $ - 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000 $ 7983 GIS Record Document Conversion $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 50,000 $ 175,000 $ 75,000 $ - $ - $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 300,000 182 220 221 260 420 430 465 540 Total
7969 Facility Improvements at Brea Creek Golf Course $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 50,000 $ - $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 50,000 $ - $ 50,000
$ 425,000 175,000 $ 1,375,000 $ 1,775,000 $ 3,610,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 8,960,000 $ 2029-30 EXPENDITURE BY FUND

STREET IMPROVEMENTS
Street Improvement Totals

WATER IMPROVEMENTS
TOTAL
Water Improvement Totals

SEWER IMPROVEMENTS
Sewer Improvement Totals

TRAFFIC SAFETY ENHANCEMENTS
Traffic Safety Enhancement Totals
Golf Course Improvement Totals
Facility Improvement Totals

GOLF COURSE IMPROVEMENTS

FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS
182 220 221 260 420 430 465 540 Total
7219 Traffic Calming Improvements $ - $ 150,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 150,000 7312 Citywide Slurry Seal Program $ - $ - $ - $ 300,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 300,000 7313 Citywide Sidewalk Replacement $ - $ 200,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 200,000 7329 Birch Street Improvements S. Associated to Valencia $ - $ - $ 1,375,000 $ 1,375,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,750,000 $ - $ 350,000 $ 1,375,000 $ 1,675,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 3,400,000 182 220 221 260 420 430 465 540 Total
7218 Traffic Signal Controller Upgrade $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 50,000 $ 150,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 50,000 $ 150,000
182 220 221 260 420 430 465 540 Total
7442 Miscellaneous Water Improvement Program $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 200,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 200,000 7479 Lotus Place Water Line Improvements $ - $ 150,000 $ - $ 200,000 $ 3,500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 3,850,000 $ - $ 150,000 $ - $ 200,000 $ 3,700,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 4,050,000 182 220 221 260 420 430 465 540 Total
7617 Sewer Mainline Relining $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 600,000 $ - $ - $ 600,000 7629 Randolph Ave & Imperial Hwy Sewer Capacity Improvements $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 65,000 $ - $ - $ 65,000 7632 Carbon Canyon Access Road Phase 1-3 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 900,000 $ - $ - $ 900,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,565,000 $ - $ - $ 1,565,000
182 220 221 260 420 430 465 540 Total
7936 City Facility & Median Landscape Improvements $ 75,000 $ 75,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 150,000 7983 GIS Record Document Conversion $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 50,000 $ 75,000 $ 75,000 $ - $ - $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 200,000 182 220 221 260 420 430 465 540 Total
7969 Facility Improvements at Brea Creek Golf Course $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 50,000 $ - $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 50,000 $ - $ 50,000
$ 575,000 75,000 $ 1,375,000 $ 1,975,000 $ 3,750,000 $ 1,565,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 9,415,000 $ 2030-31 EXPENDITURE BY FUND

STREET IMPROVEMENTS
Street Improvement Totals

WATER IMPROVEMENTS
TOTAL
Water Improvement Totals

SEWER IMPROVEMENTS
Sewer Improvement Totals

TRAFFIC SAFETY ENHANCEMENTS
Traffic Safety Enhancement Totals
Golf Course Improvement Totals
Facility Improvement Totals

GOLF COURSE IMPROVEMENTS

FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS
182 220 221 260 420 430 465 540 Total
7219 Traffic Calming Improvements $ - $ 150,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 150,000 7312 Citywide Slurry Seal Program $ - $ - $ - $ 300,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 300,000 7313 Citywide Sidewalk Replacement $ - $ 200,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 200,000 7327 Central Avenue & State College Street Improvements $ - $ 750,000 $ - $ 750,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,500,000 7332 Citywide Street Light LED Upgrades $ - $ 975,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 975,000 7336 Randolph Avenue Street Improvements $ - $ - $ 750,000 $ 750,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,500,000 $ - $ 2,075,000 $ 750,000 $ 1,800,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 4,625,000 182 220 221 260 420 430 465 540 Total
7218 Traffic Signal Controller Upgrade $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 50,000 $ 150,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 50,000 $ 150,000
182 220 221 260 420 430 465 540 Total
7442 Miscellaneous Water Improvement Program $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 200,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 200,000 7496 790 Zone Reservoir Improvements $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 700,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 700,000
182 220 221 260 420 430 465 540 Total
7617 Sewer Mainline Relining $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 600,000 $ - $ - $ 600,000 7629 Randolph Ave & Imperial Hwy Sewer Capacity Improvements $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 690,000 $ - $ - $ 690,000 7632 Carbon Canyon Access Road Phase 1-3 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 900,000 $ - $ - $ 900,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,190,000 $ - $ - $ 2,190,000
182 220 221 260 420 430 465 540 Total
7936 City Facility & Median Landscape Improvements $ 75,000 $ 75,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 150,000 7970 Citywide HVAC Improvements $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000 7974 Citywide Elevator Improvements $ 200,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 200,000 7979 Mechanical Upgrades to City Facilities $ 150,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 150,000 7983 GIS Record Document Conversion $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 50,000 $ 525,000 $ 75,000 $ - $ - $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 650,000 182 220 221 260 420 430 465 540 Total
7969 Facility Improvements at Brea Creek Golf Course $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 50,000 $ - $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 50,000 $ - $ 50,000
$ 2,150,000 525,000 $ 750,000 $ 1,900,000 $ 750,000 $ 2,190,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 8,365,000 $ 2031-32 EXPENDITURE BY FUND

STREET IMPROVEMENTS
Street Improvement Totals

WATER IMPROVEMENTS
TOTAL
Water Improvement Totals

SEWER IMPROVEMENTS
Sewer Improvement Totals

TRAFFIC SAFETY ENHANCEMENTS
Traffic Safety Enhancement Totals
Golf Course Improvement Totals
Facility Improvement Totals

GOLF COURSE IMPROVEMENTS

FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS

CITY OF BREA

SEVEN-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT

PROGRAM BUDGET
FY 2025-2026 through FY 2031-2032

STREET IMPROVEMENTS

PROJECT
Estimated
Expenditures
to Date
Estimated
Carryover
FY24-25
Proposed
2025-26
Proposed
2026-27
Proposed
2027-28
Proposed
2028-29
Proposed
2029-30
Proposed
2030-31
Proposed
2031-32
Total
Budget
DESIGN $ 5,545 20,410 $ 15,000 $ 15,000 $ 15,000 $ 15,000 $ 15,000 $ 15,000 $ 15,000 $ 130,955 $ RIGHT OF WAY - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
CONSTRUCTION 346,976 $ 94,266 $ 135,000 $ 135,000 $ 135,000 $ 135,000 $ 135,000 $ 135,000 $ 135,000 $ 1,386,242 $ CONST. ENGINEERING 40,821 $ 11,090 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 51,911 $ TOTAL $ 408,207 $ 110,902 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 1,569,109

FUNDING SOURCES
Fund 220 (Gas Tax) 261,618 $ - $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 1,311,618 $ Fund 260 (Measure M) 64,099 $ 110,902 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 175,000 $ Fund 540 (Traffic Impact) 50,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 50,000 $ Other (Funded) 32,490 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 32,490 $ TOTAL $ 408,207 $ 110,902 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 1,569,109 Project Manager Approval: Ryan Chapman
PROJECT 7219

STREET IMPROVEMENTS - TRAFFIC CALMING IMPROVEMENTS
This is an annual program for the development and implementation of traffic calming improvements as recommended by Traffic Committee and approved by City Council.

PROJECT
Estimated
Expenditures to
Date
Estimated
Carryover
FY24-25
Proposed
2025-26
Proposed
2026-27
Proposed
2027-28
Proposed
2028-29
Proposed
2029-30
Proposed
2030-31
Proposed
2031-32
Total
Budget
DESIGN $ 322,432 1,318,853 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,641,285 $ RIGHT OF WAY - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
CONSTRUCTION 22,420,507 $ 5,481,336 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 27,901,843 $ CONST. ENGINEERING 2,637,707 $ 644,863 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 3,282,570 $ TOTAL $ 26,377,067 $ 6,448,630 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 32,825,697

FUNDING SOURCES
Fund 540 (Traffic Impact) 6,509,962 $ 1,072,594 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 7,582,556 $ Federal Grants 896,070 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 896,070 $ County Grants 18,814,186 $ 5,376,036 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 24,190,222 $ Other (Unfunded) 156,849 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 156,849 $ TOTAL $ 26,377,067 $ 6,448,630 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 32,825,697 Project Manager Approval: Michael Ho
PROJECT 7251
STREET IMPROVEMENTS- SR-57 FREEWAY/LAMBERT ROAD INTERCHANGE This project constructed a new eastbound to northbound loop on-ramp and modify the spacing between the existing SR-57 on and off ramps to improve traffic flow. Current funding is for construction. Coordination with Caltrans is required for design, permit, and construction. Caltrans is the lead agency for Environmental and Implementation. City of Brea is the lead for the Right-of-Way and Design. Phase 2 includes paving of Lambert Road from State College to S. Associated Road.

PROJECT
Estimated
Expenditures
to Date
Estimated
Carryover
FY24-25
Proposed
2025-26
Proposed
2026-27
Proposed
2027-28
Proposed
2028-29
Proposed
2029-30
Proposed
2030-31
Proposed
2031-32
Total
Budget
DESIGN $ 1,673 50,844 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 52,517 $ RIGHT OF WAY - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
CONSTRUCTION 864,341 $ 28,443 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 892,783 $ CONST. ENGINEERING 101,687 $ 3,346 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 105,033 $ TOTAL $ 1,016,871 $ 33,462 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,050,333

FUNDING SOURCES
Fund 540 (Traffic Impact) 1,016,871 $ 33,462 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,050,333 $ TOTAL $ 1,016,871 $ 33,462 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,050,333 Project Manager Approval: Ryan Chapman
PROJECT 7278
STREET IMPROVEMENTS- IMPERIAL HWY. AND BERRY ST. INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS This project widened the north side of Imperial Highway east of Berry Street to allow for a dedicated westbound right-turn lane, which is part of the City’s Traffic Impact Nexus Study. The remaining work is to coordinate with Caltrans to finalize the right-of-way and/or easement dedication for the project.

PROJECT
Estimated
Expenditures
to Date
Estimated
Carryover
FY24-25
Proposed
2025-26
Proposed
2026-27
Proposed
2027-28
Proposed
2028-29
Proposed
2029-30
Proposed
2030-31
Proposed
2031-32
Total
Budget
DESIGN $ 23,596 938,090 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 961,685 $ RIGHT OF WAY - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
CONSTRUCTION - $ 401,124 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 401,124 $ CONST. ENGINEERING - $ 47,191 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 47,191 $ TOTAL $ 938,090 $ 471,911 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,410,001

FUNDING SOURCES
Fund 220 (Gas Tax) 471,425 $ 471,911 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 943,335 $ Fund 221 (RMRA) 466,665 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 466,665 $ TOTAL $ 938,090 $ 471,911 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,410,001 Project Manager Approval: Ryan Chapman
PROJECT 7299

STREET IMPROVEMENTS - BREA BOULEVARD STREET IMPROVEMENTS This project improved the pavement on Brea Boulevard between Imperial Highway and Juniper Street pursuant to the City’s Pavement Management Plan. The improvements included asphalt mill and overlay, asphalt replacement, and ADA ramp reconstruction.

PROJECT
Estimated
Expenditures
to Date
Estimated
Carryover
FY24-25
Proposed
2025-26
Proposed
2026-27
Proposed
2027-28
Proposed
2028-29
Proposed
2029-30
Proposed
2030-31
Proposed
2031-32
Total
Budget
DESIGN $ 1,210,216 314,920 $ - $ - $ 500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,025,135 $ RIGHT OF WAY - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
CONSTRUCTION - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
CONST. ENGINEERING - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ TOTAL $ 314,920 $ 1,210,216 $ - $ - $ 500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,025,135

FUNDING SOURCES
Fund 260 (Measure M) - $ 476,150 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 476,150 $ Fund 540 (Traffic Impact) 314,920 $ 734,066 $ - $ - $ 500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,548,985 $ TOTAL $ 314,920 $ 1,210,216 $ - $ - $ 500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,025,135 Project Manager Approval: Ryan Chapman
PROJECT 7306
STREET IMPROVEMENTS - IMPERIAL HWY/SR-57 INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS As identified in the Transportation Improvement Nexus Program, this project will widen the SR-57 southbound on-ramp and reconfigure eastbound lanes on Imperial Highway.

The project will improve traffic operational performance and reduce congestion on Imperial Highway. Coordination with Caltrans is required for design, permit, and construction.

PROJECT
Estimated
Expenditures to
Date
Estimated
Carryover
FY24-25
Proposed
2025-26
Proposed
2026-27
Proposed
2027-28
Proposed
2028-29
Proposed
2029-30
Proposed
2030-31
Proposed
2031-32
Total
Budget
DESIGN $ 19,604 62,417 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 82,021 $ RIGHT OF WAY - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
CONSTRUCTION 1,061,083 $ 333,271 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 3,494,354 $ CONST. ENGINEERING 124,833 $ 39,208 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 164,042 $ TOTAL $ 1,248,333 $ 392,084 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 3,740,417

FUNDING SOURCES
Fund 220 (Gas Tax) 382,067 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 382,067 $ Fund 260 (Measure M) 766,266 $ 392,084 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 3,258,350 $ Fund 440 (Sanitation) 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000 $ TOTAL $ 1,248,333 $ 392,084 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 3,740,417 Eric Aulls
PROJECT 7312

STREET IMPROVEMENTS - CITYWIDE SLURRY SEAL PROGRAM
The slurry seal program is a proactive street maintenance program through which City streets are slurry sealed each year. Each year, a listing of specific streets is reviewed for slurry seal in coordination with the Pavement Management Plan (PMP) recommendations.

Project Manager Approval:

PROJECT
Estimated
Expenditures
to Date
Estimated
Carryover
FY24-25
Proposed
2025-26
Proposed
2026-27
Proposed
2027-28
Proposed
2028-29
Proposed
2029-30
Proposed
2030-31
Proposed
2031-32
Total
Budget
DESIGN $ 6,636 42,157 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 48,793 $ RIGHT OF WAY - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
CONSTRUCTION 716,663 $ 112,810 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 2,229,473 $ CONST. ENGINEERING 84,313 $ 13,272 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 97,585 $ TOTAL $ 843,133 $ 132,717 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 2,375,850

FUNDING SOURCES
Fund 182 (FARP) 269,007 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 269,007 $ Fund 220 (Gas Tax) 574,127 $ 132,717 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 2,106,844 $ TOTAL $ 843,133 $ 132,717 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 2,375,850 Project Manager Approval: Eric Aulls
PROJECT 7313

STREET IMPROVEMENTS - CITYWIDE SIDEWALK REPLACEMENT
This project allows for repair and replacement of concrete sidewalks, curb and gutter, and curb access ramps on an annual as-needed basis.

NOT TO SCALE VICINITY MAP

KRAEMER
BLVD PHASE 1 PHASE 2 PROJECT 7322 COUNTRY HILLS SUBDIVISION PAVEMENT/WATER REHABILITATION STREET IMPROVEMENTS - BIRCH ST LAMBERT RD LEGEND

PROJECT
Estimated
Expenditures
to Date
Estimated
Carryover
FY24-25
Proposed
2025-26
Proposed
2026-27
Proposed
2027-28
Proposed
2028-29
Proposed
2029-30
Proposed
2030-31
Proposed
2031-32
Total
Budget
DESIGN 427,613 $ 28,870 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 456,483 $ RIGHT OF WAY - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
CONSTRUCTION 7,269,417 $ 490,792 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 7,760,208 $ CONST. ENGINEERING 855,226 $ 57,740 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 912,966 $ TOTAL $ 577,402 8,552,255 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 9,129,657 $

FUNDING SOURCES
Fund 220 (Gas Tax) 603,234 $ 144,766 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 748,000 $ Fund 221 (RMRA) - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Fund 260 (Measure M) 1,315,000 $ 300,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,615,000 $ Fund 420 (Water) 6,634,021 $ 132,636 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 6,766,657 $ TOTAL $ 577,402 8,552,255 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 9,129,657 $ Project Manager Approval: Angelica Flores
PROJECT 7322

STREET IMPROVEMENTS - COUNTRY HILLS SUBDIVISION PAVEMENT/WATER REHABILITATION This project rehabilitated the existing streets within the County Hills subdivision pursuant to the City’s Pavement Management Plan (PMP). Additionally, the existing water connections throughout the area were replaced. The improvements also included updating curb, gutter, and ADA ramps.

PROJECT
Estimated
Expenditures
to Date
Estimated
Carryover
FY24-25
Proposed
2025-26
Proposed
2026-27
Proposed
2027-28
Proposed
2028-29
Proposed
2029-30
Proposed
2030-31
Proposed
2031-32
Total
Budget
DESIGN $ 345,355 49,645 $ 40,000 $ - $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 485,000 $ RIGHT OF WAY - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
CONSTRUCTION - $ - $ 320,000 $ - $ 600,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 920,000 $ CONST. ENGINEERING - $ - $ 40,000 $ - $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 90,000 $ TOTAL $ 49,645 $ 345,355 $ 400,000 $ - $ 700,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,495,000

FUNDING SOURCES
Fund 220 (Gas Tax) 49,645 $ 31,327 $ - $ - $ 200,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 280,972 $ Fund 260 (Measure M) $ - - $ 500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 500,000 $ Fund 430 (Sewer) - $ 314,028 $ 400,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 714,028 $ TOTAL $ 49,645 $ 345,355 $ 400,000 $ - $ 700,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,495,000 Project Manager Approval: Rudy Correa
PROJECT 7326

STREET IMPROVEMENTS - WALNUT WAY STREET IMPROVEMENTS
This project will rehabilitate the residential roadway on Walnut Way, located south of Bracken Street and west of Brea Boulevard. This project also includes the removal and replacement of the existing sanitary sewer mainline located within Walnut Way.

PROJECT 7327

STREET IMPROVEMENTS - CENTRAL AVE & STATE COLLEGE

NOT TO SCALE

VICINITY MAP

STREET IMPROVEMENTS

PROJECT
Estimated
Expenditures
to Date
Estimated
Carryover
FY24-25
Proposed
2025-26
Proposed
2026-27
Proposed
2027-28
Proposed
2028-29
Proposed
2029-30
Proposed
2030-31
Proposed
2031-32
Total
Budget
DESIGN $ 513,353 206,646 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 150,000 $ 869,999 $ RIGHT OF WAY - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
CONSTRUCTION - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,350,000 $ 1,350,000 $ CONST. ENGINEERING - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ TOTAL $ 206,646 $ 513,353 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,500,000 $ 2,219,999

FUNDING SOURCES
Fund 220 (Gas Tax) 71,264 $ 498,735 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 750,000 $ 1,319,999 $ Fund 260 (Measure M) - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 750,000 $ 750,000 $ Fund 420 (Water) 135,382 $ 14,618 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 150,000 $ TOTAL $ 206,646 $ 513,353 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,500,000 $ 2,219,999 Project Manager Approval: Ryan Chapman
PROJECT 7327

STREET IMPROVEMENTS - CENTRAL AVE & STATE COLLEGE STREET IMPROVEMENTS This project will improve the pavement on Central Avenue and State College Boulevard between the western City limits and Lambert Road, pursuant to the City’s Pavement Management Plan. The improvements will include paving upgrades, the removal and reconstruction of curb, gutter, and ADA ramps, as well as the removal and replacement of existing water mains, services, and water infrastructure within the project limits.

PROJECT
Estimated
Expenditures
to Date
Estimated
Carryover
FY24-25
Proposed
2025-26
Proposed
2026-27
Proposed
2027-28
Proposed
2028-29
Proposed
2029-30
Proposed
2030-31
Proposed
2031-32
Total
Budget
DESIGN $ 19,821 21,679 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 41,500 $ RIGHT OF WAY - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
CONSTRUCTION 368,544 $ 336,956 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 705,500 $ CONST. ENGINEERING 43,358 $ 39,642 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 83,000 $ TOTAL $ 433,581 $ 396,419 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 830,000

FUNDING SOURCES
Fund 140 (C.B.E.D.) 433,581 $ 396,419 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 830,000 $ TOTAL $ 433,581 $ 396,419 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 830,000 Project Manager Approval: Michael Ho
PROJECT 7328

STREET IMPROVEMENTS - BREA DOWNTOWN PARKLETS PROJECT
This project constructed parklets on Birch Street between Madrona Avenue and Walnut Avenue, and on the east side of Brea Boulevard between Birch Street and Ash Street.

Improvements included hardscaping, landscaping, and the installation of various pedestrian amenities within the project limits.

PROJECT 7329 STREET IMPROVEMENTS - BIRCH ST NOT TO SCALE VICINITY MAP VALENCIA AVEBIRCH STREET IMPROVEMENTS S. ASSOCIATED TO VALENCIA

PROJECT
Estimated
Expenditures
to Date
Estimated
Carryover
FY24-25
Proposed
2025-26
Proposed
2026-27
Proposed
2027-28
Proposed
2028-29
Proposed
2029-30
Proposed
2030-31
Proposed
2031-32
Total
Budget
DESIGN $ 3,592,406 357,595 $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 275,000 $ - $ 4,275,001 $ RIGHT OF WAY - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
CONSTRUCTION - $ - $ 400,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,475,000 $ - $ 2,875,000 $ CONST. ENGINEERING - $ - $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 50,000 $ TOTAL $ 357,595 $ 3,592,406 $ 500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,750,000 $ - $ 7,200,001

FUNDING SOURCES
Fund 221 (RMRA) 307,595 $ 3,592,406 $ 250,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,375,000 $ - $ 5,525,001 $ Fund 260 (Measure M) - $ - $ 250,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,375,000 $ - $ 1,625,000 $ Fund 420 (Water) 50,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 50,000 $ TOTAL $ 357,595 $ 3,592,406 $ 500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,750,000 $ - $ 7,200,001 Project Manager Approval: Ryan Chapman
PROJECT 7329
STREET IMPROVEMENTS - BIRCH ST. IMPROVEMENTS S. ASSOCIATED TO VALENCIA This project will improve the pavement on Birch Street between S. Associated Road and Valencia Avenue, pursuant to the City’s Pavement Management Plan. The improvements will include paving upgrades, the removal and reconstruction of curb, gutter, and ADA ramps, as well as the removal and replacement of existing water mains and an exisitng PRV vault at the intersection of Birch Street and Kraemer Avenue.

PROJECT 7332

STREET IMPROVEMENTS -

NOT TO SCALE

VICINITY MAP

CITYWIDE PROJECT

CITYWIDE STREET LIGHT LED UPGRADES

PROJECT
Estimated
Expenditures
to Date
Estimated
Carryover
FY24-25
Proposed
2025-26
Proposed
2026-27
Proposed
2027-28
Proposed
2028-29
Proposed
2029-30
Proposed
2030-31
Proposed
2031-32
Total
Budget
DESIGN $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
RIGHT OF WAY - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
CONSTRUCTION - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 975,000 $ 975,000 $ CONST. ENGINEERING - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ TOTAL $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 975,000 $ 975,000

FUNDING SOURCES
Fund 182 (FARP) $ - - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Fund 220 (Gas Tax) - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 975,000 $ 975,000 $ TOTAL $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 975,000 $ 975,000 PROJECT 7332

STREET IMPROVEMENTS - CITYWIDE STREET LIGHT LED UPGRADES This project will replace all existing inductive street lighting heads within the City to LED street lighting heads.

Project Manager Approval: Eric Aulls
PROJECT 7333 FLOWER AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENTS NOT TO SCALE VICINITY MAP STREET IMPROVEMENTS -

PROJECT
Estimated
Expenditures
to Date
Estimated
Carryover
FY24-25
Proposed
2025-26
Proposed
2026-27
Proposed
2027-28
Proposed
2028-29
Proposed
2029-30
Proposed
2030-31
Proposed
2031-32
Total
Budget
DESIGN $ 1,250 3,750 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 5,000 $ RIGHT OF WAY - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
CONSTRUCTION 63,750 $ 21,250 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 85,000 $ CONST. ENGINEERING 7,500 $ 2,500 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 10,000 $ TOTAL $ 75,000 $ 25,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000

FUNDING SOURCES
Other (Funded) 75,000 $ 25,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000 $ TOTAL $ 75,000 $ 25,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000 PROJECT 7333

STREET IMPROVEMENTS - FLOWER AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENTS This project will modify Flower Avenue and the intersection of Imperial Highway & Flower Avenue to increase the use of active transportation modes and enhance the safety and mobility of pedestrians walking and biking. Improvements will also include updating curb, gutter, sidewalk, and making utility modifications.

Project Manager Approval: Ryan Chapman
PROJECT 7334 PALM STREET PAVING IMPROVEMENTS NOT TO SCALE VICINITY MAP STREET IMPROVEMENTS -

PROJECT
Estimated
Expenditures
to Date
Estimated
Carryover
FY24-25
Proposed
2025-26
Proposed
2026-27
Proposed
2027-28
Proposed
2028-29
Proposed
2029-30
Proposed
2030-31
Proposed
2031-32
Total
Budget
DESIGN $ - - $ 130,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 130,000 $ RIGHT OF WAY - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
CONSTRUCTION - $ - $ 1,170,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,170,000 $ CONST. ENGINEERING - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ TOTAL $ - $ - $ 1,300,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,300,000

FUNDING SOURCES
Fund 220 (Gas Tax) - $ - $ 390,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 390,000 $ Fund 260 (Measure M) - $ - $ 910,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 910,000 $ TOTAL $ - $ - $ 1,300,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,300,000 PROJECT 7334

STREET IMPROVEMENTS - PALM STREET PAVING IMPROVEMENTS
This project will rehabilitate the existing roadway of Palm Street from Bonita Place to W. Central Avenue within the City limits. Improvements will also include updating curb, gutter, ADA ramps, sidewalks, and drainage improvements.

Project Manager Approval: Ryan Chapman
PROJECT 7335 BREA BLVD. TO S. ASSOCIATED RD. NOT TO SCALE VICINITY MAP STREET IMPROVEMENTS - BIRCH STREET IMPROVEMENTS

PROJECT
Estimated
Expenditures
to Date
Estimated
Carryover
FY24-25
Proposed
2025-26
Proposed
2026-27
Proposed
2027-28
Proposed
2028-29
Proposed
2029-30
Proposed
2030-31
Proposed
2031-32
Total
Budget
DESIGN $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ 200,000 $ RIGHT OF WAY - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
CONSTRUCTION - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,500,000 $ 2,500,000 $ - $ - $ 5,000,000 $ CONST. ENGINEERING - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ - $ - $ 300,000 $ TOTAL $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,750,000 $ 2,750,000 $ - $ - $ 5,500,000

FUNDING SOURCES
Fund 221 (RMRA) - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,375,000 $ 1,375,000 $ - $ - $ 2,750,000 $ Fund 260 (Measure M) - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,375,000 $ 1,375,000 $ - $ - $ 2,750,000 $ TOTAL $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,750,000 $ 2,750,000 $ - $ - $ 5,500,000 PROJECT 7335
STREET IMPROVEMENTS - BIRCH ST. IMPROVEMENTS BREA BLVD. TO S. ASSOCIATED RD.

This project will improve the pavement on Birch Street, from Brea Boulevard to South Associated Road, pursuant to the City’s Pavement Management Plan. The improvements will include paving upgrades, the removal and reconstruction of curb, gutter, sidewalk, and ADA ramps.

Project Manager Approval: Ryan Chapman
PROJECT 7336 RANDOLPH AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENTS NOT TO SCALE VICINITY MAP STREET IMPROVEMENTS -

PROJECT
Estimated
Expenditures
to Date
Estimated
Carryover
FY24-25
Proposed
2025-26
Proposed
2026-27
Proposed
2027-28
Proposed
2028-29
Proposed
2029-30
Proposed
2030-31
Proposed
2031-32
Total
Budget
DESIGN $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ RIGHT OF WAY - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
CONSTRUCTION - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,350,000 $ 1,350,000 $ CONST. ENGINEERING - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ TOTAL $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000

FUNDING SOURCES
Fund 221 (RMRA) - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 750,000 $ 750,000 $ Fund 260 (Measure M) - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 750,000 $ 750,000 $ TOTAL $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 PROJECT 7336
STREET IMPROVEMENTS - RANDOLPH AVE. STREET IMPROVEMENTS This project will improve the pavement on Randolph Avenue, from Birch Street to Imperial Highway, pursuant to the City’s Pavement Management Plan. The improvements will include paving upgrades, the removal and reconstruction of curb, gutter, sidewalk, and ADA ramps.

Project Manager Approval: Ryan Chapman
PROJECT 7337 STREET IMPROVEMENTS - NOT TO SCALE VICINITY MAP TANGLEWOOD STREET PAVING IMPROVEMENTS

PROJECT
Estimated
Expenditures
to Date
Estimated
Carryover
FY24-25
Proposed
2025-26
Proposed
2026-27
Proposed
2027-28
Proposed
2028-29
Proposed
2029-30
Proposed
2030-31
Proposed
2031-32
Total
Budget
DESIGN $ - - $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 50,000 $ RIGHT OF WAY - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
CONSTRUCTION - $ - $ 400,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 400,000 $ CONST. ENGINEERING - $ - $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 50,000 $ TOTAL $ - $ - $ 500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 500,000

FUNDING SOURCES
Fund 260 (Measure M) - $ - $ 500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 500,000 $ TOTAL $ - $ - $ 500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 500,000 PROJECT 7337

STREET IMPROVEMENTS - TANGLEWOOD STREET PAVING IMPROVEMENTS This project will improve the pavement on Tanglewood Street adjacent to the intersection of Palm Street, pursuant to the City’s Pavement Management Plan. The improvements will include paving upgrades, utility and trenching backfill modifications, and the removal and reconstruction of curb, gutter, sidewalk, and ADA ramps.

Project Manager Approval: Ryan Chapman

CITY OF BREA

SEVEN-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT

PROGRAM BUDGET
FY 2025-2026 through FY 2031-2032

STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT 7330

STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS - STORM DRAIN MASTER PLAN

NOT TO SCALE

VICINITY MAP

CITYWIDE PROJECT

PROJECT
Estimated
Expenditures
to Date
Estimated
Carryover
FY24-25
Proposed
2025-26
Proposed
2026-27
Proposed
2027-28
Proposed
2028-29
Proposed
2029-30
Proposed
2030-31
Proposed
2031-32
Total
Budget
DESIGN $ - - $ 350,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 350,000 $ RIGHT OF WAY - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
CONSTRUCTION - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
CONST. ENGINEERING - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ TOTAL $ - $ - $ 350,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 350,000

FUNDING SOURCES
Fund 550 (Storm Drain) - $ - $ 350,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 350,000 $ TOTAL $ - $ - $ 350,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 350,000 Project Manager Approval: Bryan Hong
PROJECT 7330

STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS - STORM DRAIN MASTER PLAN
This project will include the preparation of an update to the City’s Master Plan of Drainage. The update will include an analysis of the capacity of the City’s existing storm drainage infrastructure, a hydrologic and hydraulic assessment, and an analysis of recommended improvement projects.

LAMBERT RD

BREA BLVD

NOT TO SCALE

VICINITY MAP

STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS -
TRACKS SEGMENT 3 DRAINAGE REPAIRS
PROJECT 7952

PROJECT
Estimated
Expenditures
to Date
Estimated
Carryover
FY24-25
Proposed
2025-26
Proposed
2026-27
Proposed
2027-28
Proposed
2028-29
Proposed
2029-30
Proposed
2030-31
Proposed
2031-32
Total
Budget
DESIGN $ 2,175 10,405 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 12,580 $ RIGHT OF WAY - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
CONSTRUCTION 176,884 $ 36,977 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 213,860 $ CONST. ENGINEERING 20,810 $ 4,350 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 25,160 $ TOTAL $ 208,098 $ 43,502 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 251,600

FUNDING SOURCES
Fund 410 (Urban Runoff) 190,907 $ 694 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 191,601 $ Other (Funded) 17,192 $ 42,808 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 60,000 $ TOTAL $ 208,098 $ 43,502 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 251,600 Project Manager Approval: Ryan Chapman
PROJECT 7952
STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS - TRACKS SEGMENT 3 DRAINAGE REPAIRS This project will provide drainage improvements with the installation of storm drain pipes, inlets, and rip-rap; minor grading modifications; and the backfilling of the exiting drainage pit area.

CITY OF BREA

SEVEN-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT

PROGRAM BUDGET
FY 2025-2026 through FY 2031-2032

TRAFFIC SAFETY ENHANCEMENTS

PROJECT
Estimated
Expenditures
to Date
Estimated
Carryover
FY24-25
Proposed
2025-26
Proposed
2026-27
Proposed
2027-28
Proposed
2028-29
Proposed
2029-30
Proposed
2030-31
Proposed
2031-32
Total
Budget
DESIGN $ 7,959 24,149 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 207,108 $ RIGHT OF WAY - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
CONSTRUCTION 410,538 $ 135,303 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 1,245,841 $ CONST. ENGINEERING 48,299 $ 15,918 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 239,217 $ TOTAL $ 482,986 $ 159,180 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 1,692,166

FUNDING SOURCES
Fund 260 (Measure M) 105,079 $ 59,180 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 864,259 $ Fund 540 (Traffic Impact) 377,907 $ 100,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 827,907 $ TOTAL $ 482,986 $ 159,180 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 1,692,166 Project Manager Approval: Ryan Chapman
PROJECT 7218

TRAFFIC SAFETY ENHANCEMENTS - TRAFFIC SIGNAL CONTROLLER UPGRADE This project proposes to replace traffic signal controllers and cabinets, update video detection equipment, replace traffic signal heads, and make traffic safety improvements at various locations throughout the City.

PROJECT
Estimated
Expenditures
to Date
Estimated
Carryover
FY24-25
Proposed
2025-26
Proposed
2026-27
Proposed
2027-28
Proposed
2028-29
Proposed
2029-30
Proposed
2030-31
Proposed
2031-32
Total
Budget
DESIGN $ 7,884 1,414 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 9,298 $ RIGHT OF WAY - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
CONSTRUCTION 24,046 $ 134,021 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 158,067 $ CONST. ENGINEERING 2,829 $ 15,767 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 18,596 $ TOTAL $ 28,290 $ 157,672 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 185,961

FUNDING SOURCES
Fund 220 (Gas Tax) 2,339 $ 157,672 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 160,011 $ Fund 540 (Traffic Impact) 25,951 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 25,951 $ TOTAL $ 28,290 $ 157,672 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 185,961 Project Manager Approval: Ryan Chapman
PROJECT 7704

TRAFFIC SAFETY ENHANCEMENTS - EMERGENCY CHANGEABLE MESSAGE SIGNS This project proposes to install changeable message signs that can be activated to notify drivers of Carbon Canyon Road closures. The proposed signage, 2 located in Caltrans jurisdiction and 2 located in City of Brea jurisdiction, will be strategically placed so that drivers can alter their travel route when Carbon Canyon Road is closed.

PROJECT
Estimated
Expenditures
to Date
Estimated
Carryover
FY24-25
Proposed
2025-26
Proposed
2026-27
Proposed
2027-28
Proposed
2028-29
Proposed
2029-30
Proposed
2030-31
Proposed
2031-32
Total
Budget
DESIGN $ 398,583 71 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 398,654 $ RIGHT OF WAY - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
CONSTRUCTION 1,207 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,207 $ CONST. ENGINEERING 142 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 142 $ TOTAL $ 1,420 $ 398,583 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 400,003

FUNDING SOURCES
Fund 540 (Traffic Impact) 1,420 $ 398,583 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 400,003 $ TOTAL $ 1,420 $ 398,583 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 400,003 Project Manager Approval: Michael Ho
PROJECT 7716

TRAFFIC SAFETY ENHANCEMENTS - LAMBERT ROAD TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION This project upgraded traffic signal control equipment, developed traffic signal timing plans and synchronized traffic signals along the Lambert Road/Carbon Canyon corridor in La Habra and Brea. This was a joint project with the City of La Habra as the lead agency under the OCTA M2 Traffic Signal Synchronization Program per Resolution 2019-070 presented at the December 3, 2019 Brea City Council Meeting.

NOT TO SCALE

VICINITY MAP

TRAFFIC SAFETY ENHANCEMENTS - CLIFFWOOD

NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC CALMING IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT 7717

LAMBERT RD CLIFFWOOD
AVE

PROJECT
Estimated
Expenditures
to Date
Estimated
Carryover
FY24-25
Proposed
2025-26
Proposed
2026-27
Proposed
2027-28
Proposed
2028-29
Proposed
2029-30
Proposed
2030-31
Proposed
2031-32
Total
Budget
DESIGN $ 8,380 602,139 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 610,519 $ RIGHT OF WAY - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
CONSTRUCTION - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
CONST. ENGINEERING - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ TOTAL $ 602,139 $ 8,380 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 610,519

FUNDING SOURCES
Fund 220 (Gas Tax) 41,620 $ 8,380 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 50,000 $ Fund 260 (Measure M) 10,519 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 10,519 $ Fund 540 (Traffic Impact) 550,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 550,000 $ TOTAL $ 602,139 $ 8,380 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 610,519 Project Manager Approval: Michael Ho
PROJECT 7717

TRAFFIC SAFETY ENHANCEMENTS - CLIFFWOOD NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC CALMING IMPROVEMENTS As part of the Cliffwood Neighborhood Traffic Calming Study presented at the March 16, 2021 City Council meeting, this project installed a new protective left-turn movement in the east and westbound direction and eliminated through movements in the north and southbound direction of the intersection of Lambert Road and Cliffwood Avenue; replaced the existing traffic signal controller for the intersection of State College Boulevard and Cliffwood Avenue; and installed a new eastbound protective left-turn for the intersection of Balsa Avenue and State College Boulevard.

PROJECT 7718

TRAFFIC SAFETY ENHANCEMENTS - TRANSPORTATION

NOT TO SCALE

VICINITY MAP

CITYWIDE PROJECT

IMPROVEMENT NEXUS PROGRAM UPDATE

PROJECT
Estimated
Expenditures
to Date
Estimated
Carryover
FY24-25
Proposed
2025-26
Proposed
2026-27
Proposed
2027-28
Proposed
2028-29
Proposed
2029-30
Proposed
2030-31
Proposed
2031-32
Total
Budget
DESIGN $ 6,244 6 $ 25,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 31,250 $ RIGHT OF WAY - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
CONSTRUCTION 99 $ 106,151 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 106,250 $ CONST. ENGINEERING 12 $ 12,488 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 12,500 $ TOTAL $ 117 $ 124,883 $ 25,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 150,000

FUNDING SOURCES
Fund 540 (Traffic Impact) 117 $ 124,883 $ 25,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 150,000 $ TOTAL $ 117 $ 124,883 $ 25,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 150,000 PROJECT 7718

TRAFFIC SAFETY ENHANCEMENTS - TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT NEXUS PROGRAM UPDATE This project will include the preparation of an update to the City Transportation Improvement Nexus Study.

Project Manager Approval: Ryan Chapman
PROJECT 7720 KRAEMER BLVD. REGIONAL TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION NOT TO SCALE VICINITY MAP TRAFFIC SAFETY ENHANCEMENTS -

PROJECT
Estimated
Expenditures
to Date
Estimated
Carryover
FY24-25
Proposed
2025-26
Proposed
2026-27
Proposed
2027-28
Proposed
2028-29
Proposed
2029-30
Proposed
2030-31
Proposed
2031-32
Total
Budget
DESIGN $ - - $ 220,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 220,000 $ RIGHT OF WAY - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
CONSTRUCTION - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
CONST. ENGINEERING - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ TOTAL $ - $ - $ 220,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 220,000

FUNDING SOURCES
Fund 540 (Traffic Impact) - $ - $ 220,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 220,000 $ TOTAL $ - $ - $ 220,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 220,000 PROJECT 7720
TRAFFIC SAFETY ENHANCEMENTS - KRAEMER BLVD. REGIONAL TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION This project will upgrade traffic signal control equipment, develop traffic signal timing plans and synchronize traffic signals along the Kraemer Boulevard/Glassell Street/Grand Avenue corridor in Anaheim, Orange, Placentia, Santa Ana, and Brea. This is a joint project with the City of Santa Ana as the lead agency under the OCTA M2 Traffic Signal Synchronization Program per Resolution 2023-067 presented at the December 5, 2023 Brea City Council Meeting.

Project Manager Approval: Ryan Chapman
PROJECT 7721 REGIONAL TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION NOT TO SCALE VICINITY MAP TRAFFIC SAFETY ENHANCEMENTS - STATE COLLEGE BLVD.

PROJECT
Estimated
Expenditures
to Date
Estimated
Carryover
FY24-25
Proposed
2025-26
Proposed
2026-27
Proposed
2027-28
Proposed
2028-29
Proposed
2029-30
Proposed
2030-31
Proposed
2031-32
Total
Budget
DESIGN $ - - $ 200,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 200,000 $ RIGHT OF WAY - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
CONSTRUCTION - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
CONST. ENGINEERING - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ TOTAL $ - $ - $ 200,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 200,000

FUNDING SOURCES
Fund 540 (Traffic Impact) - $ - $ 200,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 200,000 $ TOTAL $ - $ - $ 200,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 200,000 PROJECT 7721
TRAFFIC SAFETY ENHANCEMENTS - STATE COLLEGE BLVD. REGIONAL TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION This project will upgrade traffic signal control equipment, develop traffic signal timing plans and synchronize traffic signals along the State College Boulevard/The City Drive corridor in Anaheim, Fullerton, Orange, and Brea. This is a joint project with the City of Anaheim as the lead agency under the OCTA M2 Traffic Signal Synchronization Program per Resolution 2024-067 presented at the December 3, 2024 Brea City Council Meeting.

Project Manager Approval: Ryan Chapman

CITY OF BREA

SEVEN-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT

PROGRAM BUDGET
FY 2025-2026 through FY 2031-2032

WATER IMPROVEMENTS

PROJECT
Estimated
Expenditures
to Date
Estimated
Carryover
FY24-25
Proposed
2025-26
Proposed
2026-27
Proposed
2027-28
Proposed
2028-29
Proposed
2029-30
Proposed
2030-31
Proposed
2031-32
Total
Budget
DESIGN $ 10,198 184,975 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 195,173 $ RIGHT OF WAY - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
CONSTRUCTION 3,144,583 $ 173,361 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 4,717,944 $ CONST. ENGINEERING 369,951 $ 20,395 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 390,346 $ TOTAL $ 3,699,509 $ 203,954 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 5,303,464

FUNDING SOURCES
Fund 420 (Water) 3,699,509 $ 203,954 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 5,303,464 $ TOTAL $ 3,699,509 $ 203,954 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 5,303,464 Project Manager Approval: Rudy Correa
PROJECT 7442

WATER IMPROVEMENTS - MISCELLANEOUS WATER IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM This project creates a fund for water improvements as they become necessary. These projects may include emergency water main repairs and upgrades of existing facilities, equipment, and appurtenances.

PROJECT 7462 WATER IMPROVEMENTS - ENTERPRISE TRACT WATER IMPROVEMENTS VALENCIA AVE NOT TO SCALE VICINITY MAP IMPERIAL HWY BIRCH ST

PROJECT
Estimated
Expenditures
to Date
Estimated
Carryover
FY24-25
Proposed
2025-26
Proposed
2026-27
Proposed
2027-28
Proposed
2028-29
Proposed
2029-30
Proposed
2030-31
Proposed
2031-32
Total
Budget
DESIGN $ 22,180 112,881 $ - $ - $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 185,061 $ RIGHT OF WAY - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
CONSTRUCTION - $ - $ - $ - $ 4,000,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 4,000,000 $ CONST. ENGINEERING - $ - $ - $ - $ 400,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 400,000 $ TOTAL $ 112,881 $ 22,180 $ - $ - $ 4,450,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 4,585,061

FUNDING SOURCES
Fund 220 (Gas Tax) - $ - $ - $ - $ 400,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 400,000 $ Fund 221 (RMRA) 25,000 $ 5,060 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 30,060 $ Fund 260 (Measure M) - $ - $ - $ - $ 550,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 550,000 $ Fund 420 (Water) 87,881 $ 17,120 $ - $ - $ 3,500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 3,605,001 $ TOTAL $ 112,881 $ 22,180 $ - $ - $ 4,450,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 4,585,061 Project Manager Approval: Ryan Chapman
PROJECT 7462

WATER IMPROVEMENTS - ENTERPRISE TRACT WATER IMPROVEMENTS This project will replace existing undersized and deteriorated water mains in the Enterprise Tract including Ranger Avenue, Enterprise Street, Voyager Avenue, Surveyor Avenue, and Nasa Street. Additionally, this project will also rehabilitate the existing roadway within the project limits pursuant to the City's Pavement Management Plan.

PROJECT 7465 WATER IMPROVEMENTS - CANDLEWOOD TRACT WATER MAIN REPLACEMENT LAMBERT RD VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE STATE COLLEGE BLVD

PROJECT
Estimated
Expenditures
to Date
Estimated
Carryover
FY24-25
Proposed
2025-26
Proposed
2026-27
Proposed
2027-28
Proposed
2028-29
Proposed
2029-30
Proposed
2030-31
Proposed
2031-32
Total
Budget
DESIGN $ 21,703 63,297 $ 10,000 $ - $ - $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 145,000 $ RIGHT OF WAY - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
CONSTRUCTION - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 4,000,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 4,000,000 $ CONST. ENGINEERING - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 350,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 350,000 $ TOTAL $ 63,297 $ 21,703 $ 10,000 $ - $ - $ 4,400,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 4,495,000

FUNDING SOURCES
Fund 220 (Gas Tax) - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 800,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 800,000 $ Fund 420 (Water) 63,297 $ 21,703 $ 10,000 $ - $ - $ 3,600,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 3,695,000 $ TOTAL $ 63,297 $ 21,703 $ 10,000 $ - $ - $ 4,400,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 4,495,000 Project Manager Approval: Ryan Chapman
PROJECT 7465

WATER IMPROVEMENTS - CANDLEWOOD TRACT WATER MAIN REPLACEMENT This project will replace existing undersized and deteriorated water mains in the Candlewood Tract neighborhood on the south side of State College Boulevard between Cliffwood Street and Balsa Avenue.

PROJECT
Estimated
Expenditures
to Date
Estimated
Carryover
FY24-25
Proposed
2025-26
Proposed
2026-27
Proposed
2027-28
Proposed
2028-29
Proposed
2029-30
Proposed
2030-31
Proposed
2031-32
Total
Budget
DESIGN $ - 74,053 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 74,053 $ RIGHT OF WAY - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
CONSTRUCTION 1,258,908 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,258,908 $ CONST. ENGINEERING 148,107 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 148,107 $ TOTAL $ 1,481,068 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,481,068

FUNDING SOURCES
Fund 260 (Measure M) 360,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 360,000 $ Fund 420 (Water) 1,121,069 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,121,069 $ TOTAL $ 1,481,068 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,481,068 Project Manager Approval: Ryan Chapman
PROJECT 7466

WATER IMPROVEMENTS - SOUTH BREA NEIGHBORHOOD WATER MAIN REPLACEMENT This project will replace existing water mains in the residential neighborhoods bound to the north by Imperial Highway, to the west by Brea Boulevard, to the east by State College, and to the south by the City limit. Additionally, this project will also rehabilitate the existing roadway within the project limits pursuant to the City's Pavement Management Plan.

PROJECT 7470 CARBON CANYON BOOSTER NO. 2 IMPROVEMENTS NOT TO SCALE VICINITY MAP WATER IMPROVEMENTS -

PROJECT
Estimated
Expenditures
to Date
Estimated
Carryover
FY24-25
Proposed
2025-26
Proposed
2026-27
Proposed
2027-28
Proposed
2028-29
Proposed
2029-30
Proposed
2030-31
Proposed
2031-32
Total
Budget
DESIGN $ 517,690 296,697 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 814,387 $ RIGHT OF WAY - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
CONSTRUCTION - $ - $ 1,800,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,800,000 $ CONST. ENGINEERING - $ - $ 200,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 200,000 $ TOTAL $ 296,697 $ 517,690 $ 2,000,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,814,387

FUNDING SOURCES
Fund 420 (Water) 296,697 $ 517,690 $ 2,000,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,814,387 $ TOTAL $ 296,697 $ 517,690 $ 2,000,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,814,387 Project Manager Approval: Bryan Hong
PROJECT 7470
WATER IMPROVEMENTS - CARBON CANYON BOOSTER NO. 2 IMPROVEMENTS This project will construct a new building enclosure and associated infrastructure for Booster Pump Station No. 2 to provide further protection for the booster pump. This project will also install an emergency generator and make all necessary pump, water line, and electrical upgrades and modifications for operation of the new generator infrastructure at Booster Pump Station No. 2.

PROJECT 7471 CARBON CANYON BOOSTER NO. 3 IMPROVEMENTS NOT TO SCALE VICINITY MAP WATER IMPROVEMENTS -

PROJECT
Estimated
Expenditures
to Date
Estimated
Carryover
FY24-25
Proposed
2025-26
Proposed
2026-27
Proposed
2027-28
Proposed
2028-29
Proposed
2029-30
Proposed
2030-31
Proposed
2031-32
Total
Budget
DESIGN 190,798 $ 35,350 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 226,148 $ RIGHT OF WAY - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
CONSTRUCTION - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
CONST. ENGINEERING - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ TOTAL $ 35,350 190,798 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 226,148 $

FUNDING SOURCES
Fund 420 (Water) 190,798 $ 35,350 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 226,148 $ TOTAL $ 35,350 190,798 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 226,148 $ Project Manager Approval: Bryan Hong
PROJECT 7471
WATER IMPROVEMENTS - CARBON CANYON BOOSTER NO. 3 IMPROVEMENTS This project will construct a new building enclosure and associated infrastructure for Booster Pump Station No. 3 to provide further protection for the booster pump. This project will also install an emergency generator and make all necessary pump, water line, and electrical upgrades and modifications for operation of the new generator infrastructure at Booster Pump Station No. 3.

PROJECT
Estimated
Expenditures
to Date
Estimated
Carryover
FY24-25
Proposed
2025-26
Proposed
2026-27
Proposed
2027-28
Proposed
2028-29
Proposed
2029-30
Proposed
2030-31
Proposed
2031-32
Total
Budget
DESIGN $ 1,777,052 72,947 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,849,999 $ RIGHT OF WAY - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
CONSTRUCTION - $ - $ - $ 3,200,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 3,200,000 $ CONST. ENGINEERING - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ TOTAL $ 72,947 $ 1,777,052 $ - $ 3,200,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 5,049,999

FUNDING SOURCES
Fund 420 (Water) 72,947 $ 1,777,052 $ - $ 3,200,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 5,049,999 $ TOTAL $ 72,947 $ 1,777,052 $ - $ 3,200,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 5,049,999 Project Manager Approval: Rudy Correa
PROJECT 7473

WATER IMPROVEMENTS - VALENCIA RESERVOIR REPAINTING
This project will make improvements to the Valencia Reservoir, including the removal and replacement of the existing coating on the interior of the reservoir, painting and safety enhancements to the exterior of the reservoir, and external waterline connection improvements. The project proposes to include bacteriological testing on the reservoir prior to project completion.

NOT TO SCALE

VICINITY MAP
WATER IMPROVEMENTS - N. ASSOCIATED RD.

NEW HIGH PRESSURE WATER LINE
PROJECT 7476

ASSOCIATED RD

LAMBERT RD

BIRCH ST

PROJECT
Estimated
Expenditures
to Date
Estimated
Carryover
FY24-25
Proposed
2025-26
Proposed
2026-27
Proposed
2027-28
Proposed
2028-29
Proposed
2029-30
Proposed
2030-31
Proposed
2031-32
Total
Budget
DESIGN 2,486,036 $ 721,764 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 3,207,800 $ RIGHT OF WAY - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
CONSTRUCTION - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
CONST. ENGINEERING - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ TOTAL $ 2,486,036 $ 721,764 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 3,207,800

FUNDING SOURCES
Fund 220 (Gas Tax) 250,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 250,000.00 $ Fund 420 (Water) 1,156,036 $ 721,764 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,877,799.96 $ Fund 541 (Water Impact) 1,080,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,080,000.00 $ TOTAL $ 2,486,036 $ 721,764 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 3,207,800 Project Manager Approval: Ryan Chapman
PROJECT 7476
WATER IMPROVEMENTS - N. ASSOCIATED RD. NEW HIGH PRESSURE WATER LINE This project installed a high pressure loop line on N. Associated Road from Birch Street to Lambert Road.

PROJECT 7479 WATER IMPROVEMENTS - LOTUS PLACE WATER LINE IMPROVEMENTS NOT TO SCALE VICINITY MAP

N PALM ST W CENTRAL AVE

PROJECT
Estimated
Expenditures
to Date
Estimated
Carryover
FY24-25
Proposed
2025-26
Proposed
2026-27
Proposed
2027-28
Proposed
2028-29
Proposed
2029-30
Proposed
2030-31
Proposed
2031-32
Total
Budget
DESIGN $ - 192,708 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 192,708 $ RIGHT OF WAY - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
CONSTRUCTION - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 3,500,000 $ - $ 3,500,000 $ CONST. ENGINEERING - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 350,000 $ - $ 350,000 $ TOTAL $ 192,708 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 3,850,000 $ - $ 4,042,708

FUNDING SOURCES
Fund 220 (Gas Tax) - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 150,000 $ - $ 150,000 $ Fund 260 (Measure M) 47,060 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 200,000 $ - $ 247,060 $ Fund 420 (Water) 145,648 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 3,500,000 $ - $ 3,645,648 $ TOTAL $ 192,708 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 3,850,000 $ - $ 4,042,708 Project Manager Approval: Ryan Chapman
PROJECT 7479

WATER IMPROVEMENTS - LOTUS PLACE WATER LINE IMPROVEMENTS This project proposes to remove and replace the existing undersized and aging waterlines on Central Avenue/La Habra Boulevard between Vallejo Street and Roscoe Street, on Palm Street between Central Avenue and Skywood Street, and within the residential neighborhood bound by Central Avenue/La Habra Boulevard to the north, Skywood Street to the south, Palm Street to the east, and Vallejo Street to the west. Additionally, this project will also rehabilitate the existing roadway within the project limits pursuant to the City's Pavement Management Plan.

PROJECT 7481 WATER IMPROVEMENTS - NOT TO SCALE VICINITY MAP BREA CORSICAN VILLAS WATER LINE IMPROVEMENTS

PROJECT
Estimated
Expenditures
to Date
Estimated
Carryover
FY24-25
Proposed
2025-26
Proposed
2026-27
Proposed
2027-28
Proposed
2028-29
Proposed
2029-30
Proposed
2030-31
Proposed
2031-32
Total
Budget
DESIGN $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 360,000 $ - $ - $ 360,000 $ RIGHT OF WAY - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
CONSTRUCTION - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
CONST. ENGINEERING - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ TOTAL $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 360,000 $ - $ - $ 360,000

FUNDING SOURCES
Fund 420 (Water) - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 360,000 $ - $ - $ 360,000 $ TOTAL $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 360,000 $ - $ - $ 360,000 Project Manager Approval: Rudy Correa
PROJECT 7481

WATER IMPROVEMENTS - BREA CORSICAN VILLAS WATER LINE IMPROVEMENTS This project proposes to replace the existing undersized waterlines within the Brea Corsican Villas neighborhood, and on S. Palm Street, between Skywood Street and Lambert Road. Additionally, this project will also rehabilitate the existing roadway within the project limits pursuant to the City's Pavement Management Plan.

PROJECT 7482 WATER IMPROVEMENTS - OLINDA VILLAGE WATER LINE IMPROVEMENTS NOT TO SCALE VICINITY MAP CANYON RD OLINDA PL CARBON

PROJECT
Estimated
Expenditures
to Date
Estimated
Carryover
FY24-25
Proposed
2025-26
Proposed
2026-27
Proposed
2027-28
Proposed
2028-29
Proposed
2029-30
Proposed
2030-31
Proposed
2031-32
Total
Budget
DESIGN $ - - $ 150,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 150,000 $ RIGHT OF WAY - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
CONSTRUCTION - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
CONST. ENGINEERING - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ TOTAL $ - $ - $ 150,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 150,000

FUNDING SOURCES
Fund 420 (Water) - $ - $ 150,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 150,000 $ TOTAL $ - $ - $ 150,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 150,000 Project Manager Approval: Bryan Hong
PROJECT 7482

WATER IMPROVEMENTS - OLINDA VILLAGE WATER LINE IMPROVEMENTS This project proposes to replace the existing undersized waterlines on segments of Olinda Place and Lilac Lane within the Olinda Village neighborhood.

PROJECT 7483 WATER IMPROVEMENTS - NOT TO SCALE VICINITY MAPW LAMBERT RD REPLACE GENERATOR AT BERRY STREET BOOSTER PUMP STATION

N BERRY ST

PROJECT
Estimated
Expenditures
to Date
Estimated
Carryover
FY24-25
Proposed
2025-26
Proposed
2026-27
Proposed
2027-28
Proposed
2028-29
Proposed
2029-30
Proposed
2030-31
Proposed
2031-32
Total
Budget
DESIGN $ - - $ 200,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 200,000 $ RIGHT OF WAY - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
CONSTRUCTION - $ - $ - $ 450,000 $ 450,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 900,000 $ CONST. ENGINEERING - $ - $ - $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000 $ TOTAL $ - $ - $ 200,000 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,200,000

FUNDING SOURCES
Fund 420 (Water) - $ - $ 200,000 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,200,000 $ TOTAL $ - $ - $ 200,000 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,200,000 Project Manager Approval: Rudy Correa
PROJECT 7483

WATER IMPROVEMENTS - REPLACE GENERATOR AT BERRY STREET BOOSTER PUMP STATION This project proposes to install a new generator and all associated electrical improvements at the Berry Street Booster Pump Station in order to add redundancy to the City pumping infrastructure in the case of emergency power outage.

PROJECT 7494 THOMPSON OIL SITE HYDRANT IMPROVEMENTS NOT TO SCALE VICINITY MAP WATER IMPROVEMENTS -

PROJECT
Estimated
Expenditures
to Date
Estimated
Carryover
FY24-25
Proposed
2025-26
Proposed
2026-27
Proposed
2027-28
Proposed
2028-29
Proposed
2029-30
Proposed
2030-31
Proposed
2031-32
Total
Budget
DESIGN $ - - $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 50,000 $ RIGHT OF WAY - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
CONSTRUCTION - $ - $ 150,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 150,000 $ CONST. ENGINEERING - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ TOTAL $ - $ - $ 200,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 200,000

FUNDING SOURCES
Fund 420 (Water) - $ - $ 200,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 200,000 $ TOTAL $ - $ - $ 200,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 200,000 PROJECT 7494

WATER IMPROVEMENTS - THOMPSON OIL SITE HYDRANT IMPROVEMENTS This project will include the construction of water and fire service improvements, including construction of a new fire hydrant service and associated paving improvements, located at the Brea Sports Park and Thompson Oil properties.

Project Manager Approval: Matthew Cuevas
PROJECT 7495 BERRY STREET RESERVOIR BOOSTER PUMP NO. 7 NOT TO SCALE VICINITY MAP WATER IMPROVEMENTS -

PROJECT
Estimated
Expenditures
to Date
Estimated
Carryover
FY24-25
Proposed
2025-26
Proposed
2026-27
Proposed
2027-28
Proposed
2028-29
Proposed
2029-30
Proposed
2030-31
Proposed
2031-32
Total
Budget
DESIGN $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ 300,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 300,000 $ RIGHT OF WAY - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
CONSTRUCTION - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,700,000 $ - $ - $ 2,700,000 $ CONST. ENGINEERING - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 300,000 $ - $ - $ 300,000 $ TOTAL $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 300,000 $ 3,000,000 $ - $ - $ 3,300,000

FUNDING SOURCES
Fund 420 (Water) - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 300,000 $ 3,000,000 $ - $ - $ 3,300,000 $ TOTAL $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 300,000 $ 3,000,000 $ - $ - $ 3,300,000 PROJECT 7495
WATER IMPROVEMENTS - BERRY STREET RESERVOIR BOOSTER PUMP NO. 7 This project will construct a new Booster Pump Station No. 7 and building enclosure at the Berry Street Reservoir. The proposed improvements will include the construction of the new booster pump, the building enclosure, and all associated utility and paving infrastructure improvements.

Project Manager Approval: Ryan Chapman
PROJECT 7496 790 ZONE RESERVOIR IMPROVEMENTS NOT TO SCALE VICINITY MAP WATER IMPROVEMENTS -

PROJECT
Estimated
Expenditures
to Date
Estimated
Carryover
FY24-25
Proposed
2025-26
Proposed
2026-27
Proposed
2027-28
Proposed
2028-29
Proposed
2029-30
Proposed
2030-31
Proposed
2031-32
Total
Budget
DESIGN $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ RIGHT OF WAY - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
CONSTRUCTION - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
CONST. ENGINEERING - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ TOTAL $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 500,000 $ 500,000

FUNDING SOURCES
Fund 420 (Water) - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ TOTAL $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 500,000 $ 500,000 PROJECT 7496
WATER IMPROVEMENTS - 790 ZONE RESERVOIR IMPROVEMENTS
This project will construct a new reservoir tank within the City's 790 pressure zone. The proposed improvements will include the construction of a new booster pump, mechanical vault, electrical equipment, building enclosure, reservoir storage tank, water lines, and all associated grading, utility, and paving infrastructure improvements.

Project Manager Approval: Ryan Chapman

CITY OF BREA

SEVEN-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT

PROGRAM BUDGET
FY 2025-2026 through FY 2031-2032

SEWER IMPROVEMENTS

PROJECT
Estimated
Expenditures
to Date
Estimated
Carryover
FY24-25
Proposed
2025-26
Proposed
2026-27
Proposed
2027-28
Proposed
2028-29
Proposed
2029-30
Proposed
2030-31
Proposed
2031-32
Total
Budget
DESIGN 237,704 $ 27,173 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 264,877 $ RIGHT OF WAY - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
CONSTRUCTION 4,040,968 $ 461,944 $ 600,000 $ 600,000 $ 600,000 $ 600,000 $ 600,000 $ 600,000 $ 600,000 $ 8,702,912 $ CONST. ENGINEERING 475,408 $ 54,346 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 529,754 $ TOTAL $ 543,463 4,754,080 $ 600,000 $ 600,000 $ 600,000 $ 600,000 $ 600,000 $ 600,000 $ 600,000 $ 9,497,543 $

FUNDING SOURCES
Fund 430 (Sewer) 4,754,080 $ 543,463 $ 600,000 $ 600,000 $ 600,000 $ 600,000 $ 600,000 $ 600,000 $ 600,000 $ 9,497,543 $ TOTAL $ 543,463 4,754,080 $ 600,000 $ 600,000 $ 600,000 $ 600,000 $ 600,000 $ 600,000 $ 600,000 $ 9,497,543 $ Project Manager Approval: Rudy Correa
PROJECT 7617

SEWER IMPROVEMENTS - SEWER MAINLINE RELINING
This is an annual program to reline damaged, cracked, and broken portions of sewer mainlines within the City and to repair sewer infrastructure that is identified as having structural, operation and maintenance, or construction defects within the current Sewer Master Plan. The project will also establish an on-going repair program to address identified deficient locations of sewer mainline.

PROJECT
Estimated
Expenditures
to Date
Estimated
Carryover
FY24-25
Proposed
2025-26
Proposed
2026-27
Proposed
2027-28
Proposed
2028-29
Proposed
2029-30
Proposed
2030-31
Proposed
2031-32
Total
Budget
DESIGN $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 65,000 $ - $ 65,000 $ RIGHT OF WAY - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
CONSTRUCTION - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 590,000 $ 590,000 $ CONST. ENGINEERING - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ TOTAL $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 65,000 $ 690,000 $ 755,000

FUNDING SOURCES
Fund 430 (Sewer) - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 65,000 $ 690,000 $ 755,000 $ TOTAL $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 65,000 $ 690,000 $ 755,000 Project Manager Approval: Ryan Chapman
PROJECT 7629

SEWER IMPROVEMENTS - RANDOLPH AVE & IMPERIAL HWY SEWER CAPACITY IMPROVEMENTS This project proposes to upsize approximately 495 linear feet of sanitary sewer that crosses the intersection of Imperial Highway, in order to provide additional sewer capacity.

PROJECT
Estimated
Expenditures
to Date
Estimated
Carryover
FY24-25
Proposed
2025-26
Proposed
2026-27
Proposed
2027-28
Proposed
2028-29
Proposed
2029-30
Proposed
2030-31
Proposed
2031-32
Total
Budget
DESIGN 182,890 $ 1,342,090 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,524,980 $ RIGHT OF WAY - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
CONSTRUCTION - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
CONST. ENGINEERING - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ TOTAL $ 1,342,090 182,890 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,524,980 $

FUNDING SOURCES
Fund 430 (Sewer) 182,890 $ 1,342,090 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,524,980 $ TOTAL $ 1,342,090 182,890 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,524,980 $ Project Manager Approval: Ryan Chapman
PROJECT 7631

SEWER IMPROVEMENTS - BRIARWOOD LIFT STATION REPLACEMENT This project includes replacing the existing pump station with a package pump station at the Briarwood Lift Station, as the lift station has reached the end of its useful life.

PROJECT 7632 SEWER IMPROVEMENTS - CARBON CANYON ACCESS ROAD PHASE 1-3 NOT TO SCALE VICINITY MAP OLINDA PL CARBON CANYON RD

PROJECT
Estimated
Expenditures
to Date
Estimated
Carryover
FY24-25
Proposed
2025-26
Proposed
2026-27
Proposed
2027-28
Proposed
2028-29
Proposed
2029-30
Proposed
2030-31
Proposed
2031-32
Total
Budget
DESIGN $ 336,000 - $ 30,000 $ 300,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 666,000 $ RIGHT OF WAY - $ - $ - $ - $ 350,000 $ 350,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 700,000 $ CONSTRUCTION - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 765,000 $ 765,000 $ 765,000 $ 2,295,000 $ CONST. ENGINEERING - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 135,000 $ 135,000 $ 135,000 $ 405,000 $ TOTAL $ - $ 336,000 $ 30,000 $ 300,000 $ 350,000 $ 350,000 $ 900,000 $ 900,000 $ 900,000 $ 4,066,000

FUNDING SOURCES
Fund 430 (Sewer) - $ 336,000 $ 30,000 $ 300,000 $ 350,000 $ 350,000 $ 900,000 $ 900,000 $ 900,000 $ 4,066,000 $ TOTAL $ - $ 336,000 $ 30,000 $ 300,000 $ 350,000 $ 350,000 $ 900,000 $ 900,000 $ 900,000 $ 4,066,000 Project Manager Approval: Ryan Chapman
PROJECT 7632
SEWER IMPROVEMENTS - CARBON CANYON ACCESS ROAD PHASE 1-3 This project proposes to provide improved access and a condition assessment of the sanitary sewer main that runs along Carbon Canyon Road from Chino Hills State Park to the east City limits. Phase 1 includes right-of-way acquisition to attain access to the sewer lines that are located to the south of Carbon Canyon Road. Phase 2 includes the construction of an access road that provides vehicular access to the sewer lines located to the south of Carbon Canyon Road. Phase 3 includes providing CCTV inspection and maintenance to the sewer lines to identify potential improvements within the project limits.

PROJECT
Estimated
Expenditures
to Date
Estimated
Carryover
FY24-25
Proposed
2025-26
Proposed
2026-27
Proposed
2027-28
Proposed
2028-29
Proposed
2029-30
Proposed
2030-31
Proposed
2031-32
Total
Budget
DESIGN $ 394,142 179,858 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 574,000 $ RIGHT OF WAY - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
CONSTRUCTION - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
CONST. ENGINEERING - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ TOTAL $ 179,858 $ 394,142 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 574,000

FUNDING SOURCES
Fund 430 (Sewer) 179,858 $ 394,142 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 574,000 $ TOTAL $ 179,858 $ 394,142 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 574,000 Project Manager Approval: Ryan Chapman
PROJECT 7633
SEWER IMPROVEMENTS - BREA CREEK SIPHON S-2 ANALYSIS
This project includes providing an analysis of the sewer system both immediately up-stream and down-stream of existing Siphon S-2 located adjacent to Brea Creek within Arovista Park. The analysis will identify recommended operational improvements to the existing siphon, the routing entering and existing structure, and the routing crossing Brea Creek.

CITY OF BREA

SEVEN-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT

PROGRAM BUDGET
FY 2025-2026 through FY 2031-2032

FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT 7719

FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS - BREA PD INTEGRATED

NOT TO SCALE

VICINITY MAP

CITYWIDE PROJECT

CRIME CENTER (ICC) CITYWIDE CAMERA NETWORK

PROJECT
Estimated
Expenditures
to Date
Estimated
Carryover
FY24-25
Proposed
2025-26
Proposed
2026-27
Proposed
2027-28
Proposed
2028-29
Proposed
2029-30
Proposed
2030-31
Proposed
2031-32
Total
Budget
DESIGN $ 90,409 8,587 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 98,995 $ RIGHT OF WAY - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
CONSTRUCTION 145,972 $ 1,536,945 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,682,918 $ CONST. ENGINEERING 17,173 $ 180,817 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 197,990 $ TOTAL $ 171,732 $ 1,808,171 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,979,903

FUNDING SOURCES
State Grants 171,732 $ 1,808,171 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,979,903 $ TOTAL $ 171,732 $ 1,808,171 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,979,903 PROJECT 7719

FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS - BREA PD INTEGRATED CRIME CENTER (ICC) CITYWIDE CAMERA NETWORK This project will build a citywide camera network for the Police Department's Integrated Crime Center by installing new fiber infrastructure and utilizing existing dormant fiber to create a high-speed communication system. The project includes installing multi-sensor and PTZ cameras at various locations citywide. These cameras will transmit video feeds via the newly constructed communication system and will be integrated into the Police Department's existing video management system.

Project Manager Approval: Ryan Chapman

PROJECT
Estimated
Expenditures
to Date
Estimated
Carryover
FY24-25
Proposed
2025-26
Proposed
2026-27
Proposed
2027-28
Proposed
2028-29
Proposed
2029-30
Proposed
2030-31
Proposed
2031-32
Total
Budget
DESIGN 354,498.82 $ 69,302 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 423,801 $ RIGHT OF WAY - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
CONSTRUCTION - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
CONST. ENGINEERING - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ TOTAL $ 354,499 $ 69,302 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 423,801

FUNDING SOURCES
Fund 182 (FARP) 354,499 $ 69,302 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 423,801 $ TOTAL $ 354,499 $ 69,302 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 423,801 Project Manager Approval: Eric Aulls
PROJECT 7923
FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS - FIRE STATION NO. 1 SEISMIC UPGRADES This project will upgrade Fire Station No. 1 to meet current seismic code and construct new woman’s and accessible restroom facilities.

PROJECT
Estimated
Expenditures
to Date
Estimated
Carryover
FY24-25
Proposed
2025-26
Proposed
2026-27
Proposed
2027-28
Proposed
2028-29
Proposed
2029-30
Proposed
2030-31
Proposed
2031-32
Total
Budget
DESIGN $ 4,468 57,520 $ - $ - $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 311,988 $ RIGHT OF WAY $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
CONSTRUCTION 977,837 $ 75,951 $ - $ - $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 1,553,788 $ CONST. ENGINEERING 115,040 $ 8,935 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 123,975 $ TOTAL $ 1,150,397 $ 89,354 $ - $ - $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 1,989,751

FUNDING SOURCES
Fund 110 (General) 68,714 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 68,714 $ Fund 182 (FARP) 406,224 $ 1,091 $ - $ - $ 75,000 $ 75,000 $ 75,000 $ 75,000 $ 75,000 $ 782,315 $ Fund 220 (Gas Tax) - $ 75,000 $ - $ - $ 75,000 $ 75,000 $ 75,000 $ 75,000 $ 75,000 $ 450,000 $ Fund 250 (Park) $ 13,263 8,837 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 22,100 $ Fund 420 (Water) 495,022 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 495,022 $ Other (Funded) 171,600 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 171,600 $ TOTAL $ 1,150,397 $ 89,354 $ - $ - $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 1,989,751 Project Manager Approval: Eric Aulls
PROJECT 7936

FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS - CITY FACILITY & MEDIAN LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS This project will replace turf with a combination of low water use plant material, decomposed granite, and mulch at City facilities and medians.

NOT TO SCALE

VICINITY MAP

FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS -

WESTERN EXTENSION TO THE TRACKS AT BREA
PROJECT 7946

LAMBERT RD PALM ST

PROJECT
Estimated
Expenditures
to Date
Estimated
Carryover
FY24-25
Proposed
2025-26
Proposed
2026-27
Proposed
2027-28
Proposed
2028-29
Proposed
2029-30
Proposed
2030-31
Proposed
2031-32
Total
Budget
DESIGN $ 280,000 320,179 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 600,179 $ RIGHT OF WAY - $ 6,332,891 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 6,332,891 $ CONSTRUCTION - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
CONST. ENGINEERING - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ TOTAL $ 320,179 $ 6,288,995 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 6,609,174

FUNDING SOURCES
Fund 110 (General) 39,227 $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 39,227 $ Fund 250 (Park) 148,780 $ 841,220 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 990,000 $ Federal Grants 132,172 $ 2,019,931 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,152,103 $ State Grants $ 3,427,844 - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 3,427,844 $ TOTAL $ 320,179 $ 6,288,995 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 6,609,174 Project Manager Approval: Michael Ho
PROJECT 7946

FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS - WESTERN EXTENSION TO THE TRACKS AT BREA This project will continue the Tracks at Brea trail system to the west City limits and connect the existing facility to the City of La Habra trail system.

NOT TO SCALE

VICINITY MAP

FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS - TAMARACK PARK PARKING

LOT ASPHALT REHABILITATION
PROJECT 7956

LAMBERT RD TAMARACK AVE

PROJECT
Estimated
Expenditures
to Date
Estimated
Carryover
FY24-25
Proposed
2025-26
Proposed
2026-27
Proposed
2027-28
Proposed
2028-29
Proposed
2029-30
Proposed
2030-31
Proposed
2031-32
Total
Budget
DESIGN $ 608,959 96,042 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 705,001 $ RIGHT OF WAY - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
CONSTRUCTION - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
CONST. ENGINEERING - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ TOTAL $ 96,042 $ 608,959 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 705,001

FUNDING SOURCES
Fund 182 (FARP) 96,042 $ 408,959 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 505,001 $ Fund 220 (Gas Tax) - $ 200,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 200,000 $ TOTAL $ 96,042 $ 608,959 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 705,001 Project Manager Approval: Ryan Chapman
PROJECT 7956

FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS - TAMARACK PARKING LOT ASPHALT REHABILITATION This project will include the removal and reconstruction of the existing restroom and concessions building, construction of a trahs enclosure, asphalt paving, ADA ramp, landscape and irrigation, security camera, and parking lot improvements at Tamarack Park.

PROJECT 7970

FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS -

NOT TO SCALE

VICINITY MAP

CITYWIDE PROJECT

CITYWIDE HVAC IMPROVEMENTS

PROJECT
Estimated
Expenditures
to Date
Estimated
Carryover
FY24-25
Proposed
2025-26
Proposed
2026-27
Proposed
2027-28
Proposed
2028-29
Proposed
2029-30
Proposed
2030-31
Proposed
2031-32
Total
Budget
DESIGN $ - 1,960 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,960 $
RIGHT OF WAY - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
CONSTRUCTION 33,320 $ - $ 100,000 $ - $ 100,000 $ - $ 100,000 $ - $ 100,000 $ 433,320 $ CONST. ENGINEERING 3,920 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 3,920 $ TOTAL $ 39,200 $ - $ 100,000 $ - $ 100,000 $ - $ 100,000 $ - $ 100,000 $ 439,200

FUNDING SOURCES
Fund 182 (FARP) 39,200 $ - $ 100,000 $ - $ 100,000 $ - $ 100,000 $ - $ 100,000 $ 439,200 $ TOTAL $ 39,200 $ - $ 100,000 $ - $ 100,000 $ - $ 100,000 $ - $ 100,000 $ 439,200 Project Manager Approval: Eric Aulls
PROJECT 7970

FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS - CITYWIDE HVAC IMPROVEMENTS
This project will upgrade the HVAC, lighting, and other energy consuming equipment to improve energy use efficiency at various City facilities.

PROJECT 7974

FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS -

NOT TO SCALE

VICINITY MAP

CITYWIDE PROJECT

CITYWIDE ELEVATOR IMPROVEMENTS

PROJECT
Estimated
Expenditures
to Date
Estimated
Carryover
FY24-25
Proposed
2025-26
Proposed
2026-27
Proposed
2027-28
Proposed
2028-29
Proposed
2029-30
Proposed
2030-31
Proposed
2031-32
Total
Budget
DESIGN $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
RIGHT OF WAY - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
CONSTRUCTION - $ - $ 200,000 $ - $ - $ 200,000 $ - $ - $ 200,000 $ 600,000 $ CONST. ENGINEERING - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ TOTAL $ - $ - $ 200,000 $ - $ - $ 200,000 $ - $ - $ 200,000 $ 600,000

FUNDING SOURCES
Fund 182 (FARP) - $ - $ 200,000 $ - $ - $ 200,000 $ - $ - $ 200,000 $ 600,000 $ TOTAL $ - $ - $ 200,000 $ - $ - $ 200,000 $ - $ - $ 200,000 $ 600,000 Project Manager Approval: Eric Aulls
PROJECT 7974

FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS - CITYWIDE ELEVATOR IMPROVEMENTS
This project will update the control equipment and safety features of existing elevators at various City facilities.

PROJECT
Estimated
Expenditures
to Date
Estimated
Carryover
FY24-25
Proposed
2025-26
Proposed
2026-27
Proposed
2027-28
Proposed
2028-29
Proposed
2029-30
Proposed
2030-31
Proposed
2031-32
Total
Budget
DESIGN $ - 6,198 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 6,198 $
RIGHT OF WAY - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
CONSTRUCTION - $ - $ 315,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 315,000 $ CONST. ENGINEERING - $ - $ 35,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 35,000 $ TOTAL $ 6,198 $ - $ 350,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 356,198

FUNDING SOURCES
Fund 182 (FARP) 6,198 $ - $ 350,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 356,198 $ TOTAL $ 6,198 $ - $ 350,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 356,198 Project Manager Approval: Eric Aulls
PROJECT 7975

FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS - SENIOR CENTER & PIONEER HALL ROOFS This project will replace the roofing material and roof drain systems on both the Senior Center and Pioneer Hall buildings.

PROJECT
Estimated
Expenditures
to Date
Estimated
Carryover
FY24-25
Proposed
2025-26
Proposed
2026-27
Proposed
2027-28
Proposed
2028-29
Proposed
2029-30
Proposed
2030-31
Proposed
2031-32
Total
Budget
DESIGN $ - 8,190,091 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 8,190,091 $ RIGHT OF WAY - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
CONSTRUCTION - $ 14,765,861 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 14,765,861 $ CONST. ENGINEERING - $ 1,640,651 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,640,651 $ TOTAL $ 8,190,091 $ 16,406,512 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 24,596,603

FUNDING SOURCES
Fund 110 (General) - $ 6,331,684 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 6,331,684 $ Fund 140 (C.B.E.D.) 4,745,534 $ 3,449,059 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 8,194,593 $ Fund 182 (FARP) - $ 1,298,982 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,298,982 $ Fund 220 (Gas Tax) - $ 130,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 130,000 $ Fund 240 (AQMD) - $ 590,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 590,000 $ Fund 250 (Park) - $ 1,203,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,203,000 $ Fund 410 (Urban Runoff) 250,389 $ 182,611 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 433,000 $ Fund 420 (Water) 117,493 $ 852,850 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 970,343 $ Fund 430 (Sewer) 63,622 $ 31,378 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 95,000 $ Fund 440 (Sanitation) - $ 95,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 95,000 $ Fund 490 (Building) - $ 450,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 450,000 $ Fund 560 (Capital/Mitigation) 2,388,051 $ 1,321,949 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 3,710,000 $ State Grants $ 220,000 - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 220,000 $ County Grants $ 250,000 - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 250,000 $ Other (Funded) 625,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 625,000 $ TOTAL $ 8,190,091 $ 16,406,512 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 24,596,603 Project Manager Approval: Michael Ho
PROJECT 7978

FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS - AROVISTA PARK MODERNIZATION PROJECT The Project proposes to update and modernize the existing 14.84-acre Arovista Park in Brea, CA. The park property is generally bounded by Imperial Highway (SR 90) to the north, Jasmine Drive to the West, Brea Creek (Orange County Channel) to the East and the Brea Golf Course to the South. The work generally includes: constructing new playground equipment; removing existing and installing new restroom facilities; upgrades to walkways and ADA improvements for access; existing parking lot re-surfacing and lighting; re-surfacing existing basketball and volley ball courts; regrading existing softball fields; replacement of existing irrigation system; removing and replacement of trees; landscaping; utility improvements; and other recreational improvements and storage facility amenities within the existing footprint of the 14.84-acre park area.

PROJECT
Estimated
Expenditures
to Date
Estimated
Carryover
FY24-25
Proposed
2025-26
Proposed
2026-27
Proposed
2027-28
Proposed
2028-29
Proposed
2029-30
Proposed
2030-31
Proposed
2031-32
Total
Budget
DESIGN $ - 1,546 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,546 $
RIGHT OF WAY - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
CONSTRUCTION 26,277 $ - $ 135,000 $ - $ - $ 135,000 $ - $ - $ 135,000 $ 431,277 $ CONST. ENGINEERING 3,091 $ - $ 15,000 $ - $ - $ 15,000 $ - $ - $ 15,000 $ 48,091 $ TOTAL $ 30,914 $ - $ 150,000 $ - $ - $ 150,000 $ - $ - $ 150,000 $ 480,914

FUNDING SOURCES
Fund 182 (FARP) 30,914 $ - $ 150,000 $ - $ - $ 150,000 $ - $ - $ 150,000 $ 480,914 $ TOTAL $ 30,914 $ - $ 150,000 $ - $ - $ 150,000 $ - $ - $ 150,000 $ 480,914 Project Manager Approval: Eric Aulls
PROJECT 7979

FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS - MECHANICAL UPGRADES TO CITY FACILITIES This project will include the replacement of the existing HVAC units and related equipment at Fire Stations 1 & 3, the Brea Community Center, and the City Yard.

PROJECT
Estimated
Expenditures
to Date
Estimated
Carryover
FY24-25
Proposed
2025-26
Proposed
2026-27
Proposed
2027-28
Proposed
2028-29
Proposed
2029-30
Proposed
2030-31
Proposed
2031-32
Total
Budget
DESIGN $ 246,634 3,366 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 600,000 $ RIGHT OF WAY - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
CONSTRUCTION - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
CONST. ENGINEERING - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ TOTAL $ 3,366 $ 246,634 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 600,000

FUNDING SOURCES
Fund 410 (Urban Runoff) 778 $ 50,222 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 51,000 $ Fund 420 (Water) 778 $ 99,221 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 449,999 $ Fund 430 (Sewer) 1,810 $ 97,191 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 99,000 $ TOTAL $ 3,366 $ 246,634 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 600,000 Project Manager Approval: Angelica Flores
PROJECT 7983

FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS - GIS RECORD DOCUMENT CONVERSION
The project is an annual program to update the City GIS system and model to incorporate current as-built document information on City infrastructure that is generated through the completion of both development and capital improvement program projects within the City.

PROJECT 7984 BREA GALLERY LIGHTING UPGRADES NOT TO SCALE VICINITY MAP FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS -

PROJECT
Estimated
Expenditures
to Date
Estimated
Carryover
FY24-25
Proposed
2025-26
Proposed
2026-27
Proposed
2027-28
Proposed
2028-29
Proposed
2029-30
Proposed
2030-31
Proposed
2031-32
Total
Budget
DESIGN $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
RIGHT OF WAY - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
CONSTRUCTION - $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000 $ CONST. ENGINEERING - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ TOTAL $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000

FUNDING SOURCES
Fund 182 (FARP) - $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000 $ TOTAL $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000 PROJECT 7984

FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS - BREA GALLERY LIGHTING UPGRADES
This project will replace existing aging lighting infrastructure at the Brea Gallery, located within the Brea Civic & Cultural Center.

Project Manager Approval: Eric Aulls
PROJECT 7985 BREA SENIOR CENTER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NOT TO SCALE VICINITY MAP FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS -

PROJECT
Estimated
Expenditures
to Date
Estimated
Carryover
FY24-25
Proposed
2025-26
Proposed
2026-27
Proposed
2027-28
Proposed
2028-29
Proposed
2029-30
Proposed
2030-31
Proposed
2031-32
Total
Budget
DESIGN $ 7,500 - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 7,500 $
RIGHT OF WAY - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
CONSTRUCTION - $ 127,500 $ - $ - $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 627,500 $ CONST. ENGINEERING - $ 15,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 15,000 $ TOTAL $ - $ 150,000 $ - $ - $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 650,000

FUNDING SOURCES
Fund 290 (CDBG) - $ 150,000 $ - $ - $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 650,000 $ TOTAL $ - $ 150,000 $ - $ - $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 650,000 PROJECT 7985

FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS - BREA SENIOR CENTER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT This project will consist of the design and implementation of proposed improvements as identified within the Senior Center Feasibility Study.

Project Manager Approval: Eric Aulls
PROJECT 7986 WESTERN PARK AMENITY IMPROVEMENTS NOT TO SCALE VICINITY MAP FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS -

PROJECT
Estimated
Expenditures
to Date
Estimated
Carryover
FY24-25
Proposed
2025-26
Proposed
2026-27
Proposed
2027-28
Proposed
2028-29
Proposed
2029-30
Proposed
2030-31
Proposed
2031-32
Total
Budget
DESIGN $ - - $ - $ - $ 25,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 25,000 $ RIGHT OF WAY - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
CONSTRUCTION - $ - $ - $ - $ 180,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 180,000 $ CONST. ENGINEERING - $ - $ - $ - $ 20,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 20,000 $ TOTAL $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 225,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 225,000

FUNDING SOURCES
Fund 182 (FARP) - $ - $ - $ - $ 225,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 225,000 $ TOTAL $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 225,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 225,000 PROJECT 7986

FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS - WESTERN PARK AMENITY IMPROVEMENTS This project will install shade structures, playground equipment, and site amenities at City Hall Park, Junior High Park, and Tamarack Park.

Project Manager Approval: Eric Aulls
PROJECT 7987 WESTERN PARK RESTROOM UPGRADES NOT TO SCALE VICINITY MAP FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS -

PROJECT
Estimated
Expenditures
to Date
Estimated
Carryover
FY24-25
Proposed
2025-26
Proposed
2026-27
Proposed
2027-28
Proposed
2028-29
Proposed
2029-30
Proposed
2030-31
Proposed
2031-32
Total
Budget
DESIGN $ 47,038 70,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 117,038 $ RIGHT OF WAY - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
CONSTRUCTION 1,190,000 $ 799,639 $ - $ - $ 750,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,739,639 $ CONST. ENGINEERING 140,000 $ 94,075 $ - $ - $ 75,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 309,075 $ TOTAL $ 1,400,000 $ 940,752 $ - $ - $ 825,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 3,165,752

FUNDING SOURCES
Fund 182 (FARP) 1,400,000 $ 940,752 $ - $ - $ 825,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 3,165,752 $ TOTAL $ 1,400,000 $ 940,752 $ - $ - $ 825,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 3,165,752 PROJECT 7987

FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS - WESTERN PARK RESTROOM UPGRADES
This project will remove and replace the existing restrooms with prefabricated restrooms at City Hall Park, Junior High Park, and Tamarack Park.

Project Manager Approval: Eric Aulls
PROJECT 7988

FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS -

NOT TO SCALE

VICINITY MAP

TRACKS AMENITY IMPROVEMENTS

PROJECT
Estimated
Expenditures
to Date
Estimated
Carryover
FY24-25
Proposed
2025-26
Proposed
2026-27
Proposed
2027-28
Proposed
2028-29
Proposed
2029-30
Proposed
2030-31
Proposed
2031-32
Total
Budget
DESIGN $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ 10,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 10,000 $ RIGHT OF WAY - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
CONSTRUCTION - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 300,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 300,000 $ CONST. ENGINEERING - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ TOTAL $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 310,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 310,000

FUNDING SOURCES
Fund 182 (FARP) - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 310,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 310,000 $ TOTAL $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 310,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 310,000 PROJECT 7988

FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS - TRACKS AMENITY IMPROVEMENTS
This project will furnish and install amenity improvements on various segments of the Tracks at Brea.

Project Manager Approval: Eric Aulls
PROJECT 7989 VETERANS MEMORIAL HARDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS NOT TO SCALE VICINITY MAP FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS -

PROJECT
Estimated
Expenditures
to Date
Estimated
Carryover
FY24-25
Proposed
2025-26
Proposed
2026-27
Proposed
2027-28
Proposed
2028-29
Proposed
2029-30
Proposed
2030-31
Proposed
2031-32
Total
Budget
DESIGN $ 2,500 - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,500 $
RIGHT OF WAY - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
CONSTRUCTION - $ 42,500 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 42,500 $ CONST. ENGINEERING - $ 5,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 5,000 $ TOTAL $ - $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 50,000

FUNDING SOURCES
Fund 182 (FARP) - $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 50,000 $ TOTAL $ - $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 50,000 PROJECT 7989

FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS - VETERANS MEMORIAL HARDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS This project will install approximately 3,000 square feet of hardscape improvements adjacent to the Veterans Memorial located at the Brea Civic & Cultural Center.

Project Manager Approval: Eric Aulls
PROJECT 7991 FIRE STATION NO. 2 DISPATCH CENTER UPGRADE NOT TO SCALE VICINITY MAP FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS -

PROJECT
Estimated
Expenditures
to Date
Estimated
Carryover
FY24-25
Proposed
2025-26
Proposed
2026-27
Proposed
2027-28
Proposed
2028-29
Proposed
2029-30
Proposed
2030-31
Proposed
2031-32
Total
Budget
DESIGN $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
RIGHT OF WAY - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
CONSTRUCTION - $ - $ - $ - $ 55,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 55,000 $ CONST. ENGINEERING - $ - $ - $ - $ 5,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 5,000 $ TOTAL $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 60,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 60,000

FUNDING SOURCES
Fund 182 (FARP) - $ - $ - $ - $ 60,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 60,000 $ TOTAL $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 60,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 60,000 PROJECT 7991
FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS - FIRE STATION NO. 2 DISPATCH CENTER UPGRADE This project will renovate existing space within Brea Fire Station No. 2 and include the purchase of all furnishings and equipment necessary to allow for the space to operate as a dispatch center for the Police Department.

Project Manager Approval: Eric Aulls
PROJECT 7992 POLICE DEPARTMENT SPACE PLAN IMPROVEMENTS NOT TO SCALE VICINITY MAP FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS -

PROJECT
Estimated
Expenditures
to Date
Estimated
Carryover
FY24-25
Proposed
2025-26
Proposed
2026-27
Proposed
2027-28
Proposed
2028-29
Proposed
2029-30
Proposed
2030-31
Proposed
2031-32
Total
Budget
DESIGN $ - - $ 25,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 25,000 $ RIGHT OF WAY $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
CONSTRUCTION $ - - $ 125,000 $ - $ 1,000,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,125,000 $ CONST. ENGINEERING - $ - $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 50,000 $ TOTAL $ - $ - $ 200,000 $ - $ 1,000,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,200,000

FUNDING SOURCES
Fund 172 (Public Safety Augmentation) - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Fund 182 (FARP) $ - - $ - $ - $ 1,000,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,000,000 $ Fund 490 (Building) $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Other (Funded) $ - - $ 200,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 200,000 $ TOTAL $ - $ - $ 200,000 $ - $ 1,000,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,200,000 PROJECT 7992

FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS - POLICE DEPARTMENT SPACE PLAN IMPROVEMENTS This project will renovate and construct office space and an Integrated Crime Center within the Brea Civic & Cultural Center to meet the operational needs of the Police Department.

Project Manager Approval: Ryan Chapman
PROJECT 7995 SENIOR CENTER PAVING IMPROVEMENTS NOT TO SCALE VICINITY MAP FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS -

PROJECT
Estimated
Expenditures
to Date
Estimated
Carryover
FY24-25
Proposed
2025-26
Proposed
2026-27
Proposed
2027-28
Proposed
2028-29
Proposed
2029-30
Proposed
2030-31
Proposed
2031-32
Total
Budget
DESIGN $ 7,343 158 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 7,500 $ RIGHT OF WAY - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
CONSTRUCTION 2,678 $ 124,823 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 127,500 $ CONST. ENGINEERING 315 $ 14,685 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 15,000 $ TOTAL $ 3,150 $ 146,850 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 150,000

FUNDING SOURCES
Fund 290 (CDBG) 3,150 $ 146,850 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 150,000 $ .

TOTAL $ 3,150 $ 146,850 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 150,000 PROJECT 7995

FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS - SENIOR CENTER PAVING IMPROVEMENTS This project will include the removal and reconstruction of the existing storage shed and paved area at the southeast corner of the Brea Senior Center. Proposed improvements will include new asphalt, concrete, sidewalk, curb, gutter, drainage infrastructure, and the construction of a storage shed and associated foundation.

Project Manager Approval: Eric Aulls
PROJECT 7996

FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS -

NOT TO SCALE

VICINITY MAP

BREA DOWNTOWN PAINT IMPROVEMENTS

PROJECT
Estimated
Expenditures
to Date
Estimated
Carryover
FY24-25
Proposed
2025-26
Proposed
2026-27
Proposed
2027-28
Proposed
2028-29
Proposed
2029-30
Proposed
2030-31
Proposed
2031-32
Total
Budget
DESIGN $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
RIGHT OF WAY - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
CONSTRUCTION - $ - $ 250,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 250,000 $ CONST. ENGINEERING - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ TOTAL $ - $ - $ 250,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 250,000

FUNDING SOURCES
Fund 182 (FARP) - $ - $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000 $ Fund 220 (Gas Tax) - $ - $ 150,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 150,000 $ .

TOTAL $ - $ - $ 250,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 250,000 PROJECT 7996

FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS - BREA DOWNTOWN PAINT IMPROVEMENTS This project will repaint various structural facilities and all street light, traffic signal, and decorative banner poles in the downtown area to protect surfaces from general wear and improve overall aesthetics.

Project Manager Approval: Eric Aulls
PROJECT 7997 WILDCATTERS PARK STORAGE BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS NOT TO SCALE VICINITY MAP FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS -

PROJECT
Estimated
Expenditures
to Date
Estimated
Carryover
FY24-25
Proposed
2025-26
Proposed
2026-27
Proposed
2027-28
Proposed
2028-29
Proposed
2029-30
Proposed
2030-31
Proposed
2031-32
Total
Budget
DESIGN $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
RIGHT OF WAY - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
CONSTRUCTION - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
CONST. ENGINEERING - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ TOTAL $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -

FUNDING SOURCES
Fund 250 (Park) - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ .

TOTAL $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
PROJECT 7997

FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS - WILDCATTERS PARK STORAGE BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS This project will construct a new storage building at Wildcatters Park. Improvements will include the construction of the proposed building structure and foundation, sidewalk, electrical connections, irrigation equipment modifications, and associated grading.

Project Manager Approval: Eric Aulls
PROJECT 7998

FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS -

NOT TO SCALE

VICINITY MAP

CITYWIDE PROJECT

PUBLIC WORKS STANDARD PLANS UPDATE

PROJECT
Estimated
Expenditures
to Date
Estimated
Carryover
FY24-25
Proposed
2025-26
Proposed
2026-27
Proposed
2027-28
Proposed
2028-29
Proposed
2029-30
Proposed
2030-31
Proposed
2031-32
Total
Budget
DESIGN $ - - $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000 $ RIGHT OF WAY - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
CONSTRUCTION - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
CONST. ENGINEERING - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ TOTAL $ - $ - $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000

FUNDING SOURCES
Fund 420 (Water) - $ - $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 50,000 $ Fund 430 (Sewer) - $ - $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 50,000 $ TOTAL $ - $ - $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000 PROJECT 7998

FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS - PUBLIC WORKS STANDARD PLANS UPDATE This project will update the City's existing Standard Plans for Public Works facility infrastructure, including updates to details for streets, water, sewer, storm drain, parks, and building facility details.

Project Manager Approval: Ryan Chapman

CITY OF BREA

SEVEN-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT

PROGRAM BUDGET
FY 2025-2026 through FY 2031-2032

GOLF COURSE IMPROVEMENTS

NOT TO SCALE

VICINITY MAP

GOLF COURSE IMPROVEMENTS - FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS

AT BIRCH HILLS GOLF COURSE
PROJECT 7968

BIRCH ST KRAEMER BLVD

PROJECT
Estimated
Expenditures
to Date
Estimated
Carryover
FY24-25
Proposed
2025-26
Proposed
2026-27
Proposed
2027-28
Proposed
2028-29
Proposed
2029-30
Proposed
2030-31
Proposed
2031-32
Total
Budget
DESIGN $ 6,767 2,233 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 9,000 $ RIGHT OF WAY - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
CONSTRUCTION 37,953 $ 115,039 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ - $ 225,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 777,992 $ CONST. ENGINEERING 4,465 $ 13,534 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 17,999 $ TOTAL $ 44,651 $ 135,340 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ - $ 225,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 804,991

FUNDING SOURCES
Fund 465 (Golf Birch) 44,651 $ 135,340 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ - $ 225,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 804,991 $ TOTAL $ 44,651 $ 135,340 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ - $ 225,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 804,991 Project Manager Approval: Eric Aulls
PROJECT 7968

GOLF COURSE IMPROVEMENTS - FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS AT BIRCH HILLS GOLF COURSE This project includes various maintenance and construction improvements at Birch Hills Golf Course.

NOT TO SCALE

VICINITY MAP

GOLF COURSE IMPROVEMENTS - FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS

AT BREA CREEK GOLF COURSE
PROJECT 7969

FIR ST LANTANA AVE

PROJECT
Estimated
Expenditures
to Date
Estimated
Carryover
FY24-25
Proposed
2025-26
Proposed
2026-27
Proposed
2027-28
Proposed
2028-29
Proposed
2029-30
Proposed
2030-31
Proposed
2031-32
Total
Budget
DESIGN $ 7,044 2,956 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 10,000 $ RIGHT OF WAY - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
CONSTRUCTION 50,245 $ 119,755 $ - $ - $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 420,000 $ CONST. ENGINEERING 5,911 $ 14,089 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 20,000 $ TOTAL $ 59,112 $ 140,888 $ - $ - $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 450,000

FUNDING SOURCES
Fund 465 (Golf Birch) 59,112 $ 140,888 $ - $ - $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 450,000 $ TOTAL $ 59,112 $ 140,888 $ - $ - $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 450,000 Project Manager Approval: Eric Aulls
PROJECT 7969

GOLF COURSE IMPROVEMENTS - FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS AT BREA CREEK GOLF COURSE This project includes various maintenance and construction improvements at Brea Creek Golf Course.

City of Brea
City Council Regular Meeting Communication
A. Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment (ZOTA) No. 2025-01
Meeting
Tuesday, May 6, 2025, 7:00 PM
Agenda Group
PUBLIC HEARING Item: 3A.

TO
Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
FROM
Kristin Griffith, City Manager

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council take the following actions:

1. Waive full reading and introduce Ordinance No. 1259 titled “An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Brea Amending the Brea City Code by Adopting Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment No. 2025-01 and Approving CEQA Exemption Determination” (Attachment A);

2. Approve a California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Exemption Determination (Attachment A); and

3. Schedule adoption of aforementioned Ordinance at the next regular City Council meeting.

BACKGROUND
The proposed project a City initiated Zoning Code Text Amendment (ZOTA) to amend the Title 20 of the Brea City Code (BCC), or the Zoning Code (Code), to codify State Density Bonus Law (State Law). The State Law, codified under California Government Code Section 65915, was originally adopted in 1976 and continues to be updated to help address affordable housing needs in the state. Generally, the State Law requires local jurisdictions to grant a density bonus over the otherwise maximum allowable residential density defined in the General Plan when an applicant for an eligible housing development requests a density bonus. The State Law also requires local jurisdictions to grant certain incentives/concessions (Incentives), parking reductions, and waivers to development standards to help offset the cost of providing affordable housing.

Although the City has not adopted a local density bonus ordinance, the City has been applying the State Law when requested by the developers, as required by law. In addition, the City has a long history of encouraging various types of housing and is the only city in Orange County with the State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD)’s Prohousing Jurisdiction Designation. The proposed amendment is needed to implement the City’s 6th Cycle Housing Element Program #6 (Density Bonus Incentives), which requires the City to update the density bonus provisions to align with State Law, and to comply with HCD’s condition related to the City’s Prohousing Jurisdiction Designation, which requires timely adoption of a local density bonus ordinance.

If approved, the proposed amendment will add a new chapter, Chapter 20.42 Density Bonus, to Title 20 of the BCC.

DISCUSSION
The proposed density bonus provisions would implement the State Law, and the following are summary of the key provisions:

Eligibility
A housing development with five or more units would qualify if it provides certain number of affordable units within the development.

Exception: Housing development that would demolish or vacate existing affordable rental housing units (lower or very-low income) would be ineligible to utilize density bonus provisions unless the housing development provides the same number of affordable units as the existing development.

Density Bonus
General: The City must grant a density bonus as a matter of right when requested by a qualifying housing development. The amount of density bonus allowed varies depending on the affordability level/types of housing and the number of affordable units provided, as summarized below:

Table 1. General Density Bonus
Types of Housing Affordability
Level
Percentage of
Affordable
Units
Density
Bonus
Regular
Very low 5 to 15% 20 to 50%
Low 10 to 24% 20 to 50%
Moderate 10 to 44% 5 to 50%
Senior citizen
housing & qualifying
mobile home park
N/A N/A 20%
Specialized housing Very low 10% 20%
Student housing Lower 20 to 24% 35 to 50%
100% affordable
housing Lower
100% (up to 20%
can be moderate
income)
80%
Additional Density Bonus: In addition to the general density bonus described above, the City must also grant an additional density bonus if a qualifying housing development provides additional units affordable to very low or moderate income households and/or includes an on-site childcare facility, as summarized below:

Table 2. Additional Density Bonus
Affordability Level or
Types of Housing
Percentage of
Affordable Units Density Bonus
*Very low income 5 to 10% 20 to 32.5%
*Moderate income 5 to 15% 20 to 50%
Housing development
with childcare facility N/A
In an amount of sq.

Ft. Or residential
space that is equal to
or greater than the sq.

Ft. Of the childcare
facility
*In order for a housing development to qualify for an additional density bonus, the housing development must also provide at least 15% very low, 24% lower, or 44% moderate income units, and cannot restrict more than 50% of total units as very low, lower or moderate income units
Incentives and Waivers
The City must grant certain number of Incentives when requested by a qualifying housing development, which is based on the level of affordability and number of affordable units provided within the qualifying housing developments. In addition, the City must allow modification or waiver of a development standard that has an effect of physically precluding development of affordable housing (Waivers) when requested by a qualifying housing development. Below table summarizes the allowed Incentives and waivers:

Table 3. Allowable Incentives and Waivers
Affordability Level
or Types of
Housing
Minimum
Percentage of
Affordable Units
Number of
Incentives
Incentives
Very low income 10 to 100% 1 to 5
Lower income 5 to 100% 1 to 5
Moderate income
(for-sale unit only 10 to 45% 1 to 4
student 20 to 23% 1 to 2
Waivers Any project that qualifies to utilize the
State Law Unlimited

1. Incentives include, but not limited to: reduction in development standards, modification of zoning code requirements, approval of mixed-use zoning, and other regulatory incentives proposed by an applicant

2. Additional Incentive related to height available for housing development located within ½ mile of a major transit stop

3. One additional number of Incentive available for housing development that includes a childcare facility
Parking Ratios
General: The City must allow as a matter of right, if requested by a qualifying housing development, a density bonus parking ratio as specified in the State Law. The following table provides the density bonus parking ratio compared to the BCC requirement:

Table 4. Density Bonus Parking Ratios
Minimum Number of Required Parking Per
Unit
Total
Number of
Bedrooms
BCC
Density
Bonus Law Single- 3
Family1
MultiFamily2
Studio
2 1.5 1
1-bedroom 1.75 1
2-bedrooms 2 1.5
3-bedrooms

2.5 1.5
4 or more
bedrooms 2.5
Guest
parking 0.5 0.2 None

1. For units - must be covered; For guest spaces - can be covered/uncovered

2. For units - a portion must be covered; For guest spaces - can be covered/uncovered

3. Can be either covered/uncovered
Additional reduction: Certain types of housing developments would be eligible for additionally reduced density bonus parking ratios, as follows:

0.5 per unit
For-sale housing development with
minimum 40% moderate income
units

0.5 per bedroom
Housing development with 100%
of units for lower income
household
No minimum
number of parking
space required
Senior rental housing development
with 100% of units for lower
income individuals
Special needs housing
development with 100% of units
for lower income household
Note: In general, to qualify for additional reduction in parking, the housing development must be located within ½ mile of major transit stop and have an unobstructed access to that major transit stop General Standards
The proposed Density Bonus chapter would establish a number of general standards for the affordable units to be created within the housing developments that proposes to utilize the density bonus provisions, including, but not limited to, construction timing, length of affordability, location/design of the affordable units, and requirement of a regulatory agreement.

As proposed, the proposed Zoning Code Text Amendment is consistent with the State’s Density Bonus Law, implements the Housing Element Program #6, and is required for the City to maintain its Prohousing Jurisdiction designation.

More detailed analysis of the proposed amendments is provided in the March 25, 2025 Planning Commission staff report (Attachment B). In addition, the proposed amendments can be found in the draft Ordinance (Attachment A).

Environmental Assessment
The proposed project has been assessed in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines and the environmental regulations of the City. The Project is categorically exempt from the requirements to prepare additional environmental documentation per CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3) because the Project is limited to establishing a local density bonus ordinance, which would implement the State Law and therefore would not result in any physical changes to the environment. As such, the proposed amendments will not have a significant impact on the environment. Any future housing development would be subject to CEQA review.

Public Notice and Comments
This Project was noticed in accordance with the City’s public noticing requirements, which involved publication in the Brea Star-Progress. The public hearing notice for this Project is provided as Attachment C. As of the writing of this report, staff has not received public comments.

COMMISSION/COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
On March 25, 2025, the Planning Commission, on 5-0 vote, approved a resolution recommending approval of the proposed amendments. The meeting minutes of March 25, 2025 Planning Commission meeting is Attachment D.

FISCAL IMPACT/SUMMARY
The Project is limited to adoption of an ordinance to amend the BCC; as such, there is no impact to the General Fund.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED:

Kristin Griffith, City Manager
Prepared by: Joanne Hwang, AICP, City Planner
Concurrence: Jason Killebrew, Assistant City Manager/Community Development Director Attachments
ATTACHMENT A - Ordinance No. 1259.pdf
ATTACHMENT B - March 25, 2025 Planning Commission Staff Report.pdf ATTACHMENT C - Public Notice.pdf
ATTACHMENT D - March 25, 2025 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes.pdf DRAFT

ATTACHMENT A
1 3085689.2
ORDINANCE NO. 1259

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BREA

AMENDING THE BREA CITY CODE BY ADOPTING ZONING
ORDINANCE TEXT AMENDMENT NO. 2025-01 AND APPROVING A

CEQA EXEMPTION DETERMINATION
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BREA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

A. RECITALS:
(i) Pursuant to the City’s police power, as granted broadly under Article XI, Section 7 of the California Constitution, the City Council has the authority to enact and enforce ordinances for the public peace, health, safety, and welfare of the City and its residents.
(ii) Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) (Public Resources Code § 21000 et seq.) and the State of California Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA Guidelines”) (14 C.C.R. § 15000 et seq.), the City is the “lead agency” for the preparation and consideration of environmental documents for this Ordinance. (iii) On March 25, 2025, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing concerning Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment (“ZOTA”) No. 2025-01 and adopted its Resolution No. 2025-06 recommending approval by the City Council. (iv) On May 6, 2025, the City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing concerning ZOTA No. 2025-01, as set forth in this Ordinance. It is the intent of the City Council in adopting this Ordinance to add a new chapter (Chapter 20.42) to the Title 20 of the Brea City Code to codify and implement the State Density Bonus law (Government Code § 65915).
(v) Adoption of this Ordinance is consistent with the General Plan as it is consistent with General Plan Goals CD-1.5, Housing Element Policy 4.1, and Housing DRAFT
2 3085689.2
Element Program 6, because it establishes density bonus regulations and standards that are compliant with the State Density Bonus law, and that are clear to property owners, developers, and the general public. In addition, the City is required to adopt its local density bonus ordinance by Spring of 2025 as a condition of receiving the State Prohousing Designation from the State Department of Housing and Community Development.
(vi) This Ordinance is a matter of citywide importance and necessary for the preservation and protection of the public peace, health, safety and welfare of the community and is a valid exercise of the local police power and in accord with State law. (vii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred.

B. ORDINANCE:

SECTION 1. The City Council finds that the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct.

SECTION 2. Division I (General Regulations) of Title 20 (Zoning Code) of Part II (Development Code) of the Brea City Code is amended by adding a new Chapter 20.42 to read as follows:

20.42 DENSITY BONUS

20.42.010 PURPOSE AND APPLICABILITY.

A. Purpose.

The purpose of this chapter is to comply with and establish procedures for implementing the state Density Bonus Law (Cal. Gov. Code § 65915), and to facilitate the development of affordable housing consistent with the City of Brea Housing Element goals, objectives, and policies. In the event of a conflict between this chapter and the Density Bonus Law, the provisions of the Density Bonus Law shall prevail.

B. Applicability.

1. This chapter shall apply citywide.

DRAFT
3 3085689.2

2. The City shall grant a density bonus, incentives, waivers, and/or a reduced parking ratio requests when the applicant for a housing development with five or more units meets the requirements of this chapter, unless written findings are made in accordance with the provisions of this chapter.

3. All requests pursuant to this chapter shall be processed pursuant to Section 20.42.090 of this chapter.

20.42.020 DEFINITIONS.

For purposes of this chapter, the following definitions shall apply unless the context clearly indicates or requires a different meaning. To the extent these terms are defined in the Density Bonus Law or in other state law, the definitions provided therein shall govern:

AFFORDABLE RENT. Monthly rent, including a reasonable allowance for utilities and all fees for housing services, for rental of affordable units, as further defined in Cal. Health and Safety Code § 50053.

AFFORDABLE SALES PRICE. The maximum sales price at which lower and moderate income households can qualify for the purchase of affordable units as set forth in the City’s Affordable Housing Guidelines.

APPLICANT. Any person, firm, partnership, association, joint venture, corporation, or any entity or combination of entities that seeks development permits or approvals from the City.

APPROVAL AUTHORITY. The person or body that is authorized to approve a development as specified by this title.

CHILDCARE FACILITY. A childcare facility as defined in Cal. Gov’t. Code § 65915(h)(4).

DENSITY BONUS. A density increase, granted pursuant to Cal. Gov’t. Code § 65915 and this chapter, over the otherwise maximum allowable gross residential density as of the date of application, or, if elected by the applicant, a lesser percentage of density increase, including, but not limited to, no increase in density.

DENSITY BONUS UNITS. Those dwelling units granted pursuant to the provisions of this chapter which exceed the otherwise maximum allowable gross residential density for the housing development site.

DEVELOPMENT STANDARD. A site or construction condition as defined in in Cal. Gov’t. Code § 65915(o)(2).

DISABLED VETERANS. Persons as defined in Cal. Gov’t. Code § 18541.

DISCRETIONARY PERMIT. Any permit issued for the development which requires the exercise of judgment or deliberation from the approval authority, including conditional use permits, variances, precise developments, residential planned unit development permits, a new specific plan or amendments, General Plan amendments, zone changes, and tentative and final maps.

DRAFT
4 3085689.2
HOMELESS PERSONS. Persons as defined in the federal McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. Sec. 11301 et seq.).

HOUSING DEVELOPMENT. A development project as defined in Cal. Gov’t Code § 65915(i).

INCENTIVE. Used interchangeably, means such regulatory concessions or incentives as specified in Cal. Gov’t. Code § 65915(k).

LOWER INCOME HOUSEHOLDS. Households of lower income as defined in Cal. Health and Safety Code § 50079.5.

LOW INCOME HOUSEHOLDS. Households of low income as defined in Cal.

Health and Safety Code § 50093.

LOWER INCOME STUDENT. A student who has a household income and asset level that is defined in Cal. Gov’t. Code § 65915(o)(4).

MAJOR TRANSIT STOP. Has the same meaning as defined Cal. Pub. Res.

Code § 21155(b).

MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE RESIDENTIAL DENSITY OR BASE DENSITY.

Density as defined in Cal. Gov’t. Code § 65915(o)(6).

MODERATE INCOME HOUSEHOLDS. Households of moderate income as defined in Cal. Health and Safety Code § 50093.

QUALIFYING MOBILEHOME PARK. A mobilehome park that limits residency based on age requirements for housing older persons pursuant to Cal. Civil Code §§ 798.76 and 799.5.

REGULATORY AGREEMENT. A recorded and legally binding agreement between an Applicant and the City to ensure that the requirements of this chapter are satisfied. The Regulatory Agreement, among other things, shall establish:
the number of affordable units, their size, location, terms and conditions of affordability, and production schedule.

SENIOR CITIZEN HOUSING DEVELOPMENT. A housing development as defined in Cal. Civ. Code §§ 51.3 and 51.12. This types of housing development also includes a shared housing building development and a residential care facility for the elderly, as defined in the Cal. Health and Safety Code § 1569.2.

SHARED HOUSING BUILDING/UNIT. A residential or mixed-use structure as defined in Cal. Gov’t Code § 65915(o)(7)(A) and (B).

SPECIALIZED HOUSING DEVELOPMENT. A housing development for transitional foster youth, disabled veterans, or homeless persons.

STUDENT HOUSING DEVELOPMENT. A housing development for students that contains bedrooms containing two or more bed spaces that have a shared or private bathroom, access to a shared or private living room and laundry facilities, and access to a shared or private kitchen.

TOTAL UNITS OR TOTAL DWELLING UNITS. A calculation of the number of units as defined in Cal. Gov’t. Code § 65915(o)(8).

DRAFT
5 3085689.2
TRANSITIONAL FOSTER YOUTH. Persons defined in Cal. Ed. Code §66025.9.

VERY LOW INCOME HOUSEHOLDS. Households of very low income as defined in Cal. Health and Safety Code § 50105.

VERY LOW VEHICLE TRAVEL AREA. An urbanized area as defined in Cal.

Gov’t. Code § 65915(o)(9).

20.42.030 DENSITY BONUSES
A. General.

1. Each housing development application is entitled to only one density bonus category listed in section, except as provided for in Section 20.42.040 for additional density bonus.

2. Each component of any density calculation, including base density, bonus density, and required number of affordable units, resulting in fractional units shall be separately rounded up to the next whole number.

3. An applicant may elect to receive a density bonus that is less than the amount permitted by this section.

4. The number of density bonus units shall not be included when determining the number of affordable units required to qualify for a density bonus.

5. Any affordable unit provided pursuant to the City’s affordable unit requirements set forth in Chapter 20.40 of this title may be used to qualify for a density bonus or other provisions under this chapter. However, the payment of in-lieu fees shall not qualify for a density bonus or other provisions of this chapter.

6. Notwithstanding any provision of this chapter, all developments must satisfy all applicable requirements of the City’s affordable unit requirements in Chapter 20.40 of this title, which sets forth affordable unit requirements for developments, separate from those required to receive a density bonus or incentives pursuant to this chapter.

B. Density Bonus Categories. The City shall grant a density bonus when an applicant for a housing development with five or more dwelling units seeks and agrees to construct a housing development with at least any one of the following:

1. Very Low Income. A rental or for-sale development, including a shared housing building, that provides at least 5% of the total dwelling units of the development as affordable units affordable to very low income households, shall be eligible for a density bonus as shown in Table 20.42.030.A.1 below:

TABLE 20.42.030.A.1

VERY LOW INCOME DENSITY BONUS
Percentage Very Low Income
Units
Percentage Density Bonus
5 20
DRAFT
6 3085689.2
6 22.5
7 25
8 27.5
9 30
10 32.5
11 35
12 38.75
13 42.5
14 46.25
15 50

2. Low Income. A rental or for-sale development, including a shared housing building, that provides at least 10% of the total dwelling units as affordable units affordable to low income households, shall be eligible for a density bonus as shown in Table 20.42.030.A.2 below:

TABLE 20.42.030.A.2

LOW INCOME DENSITY BONUS
Percentage Low Income Units Percentage Density Bonus
10 20
11 21.5
12 23
13 24.5
14 26
15 27.5
16 29
17 30.5
18 32
19 33.5
20 35
21 38.75
22 42.5
23 46.25
24 50

3. Moderate Income. A for-sale development that provides at least 10% of the total dwelling units as affordable units affordable to moderate income households, provided that all dwelling units in the development are offered to the public for purchase, shall be eligible for a density bonus as shown in Table

20.42.030.A.3 below:

TABLE 20.42.030.A.3

MODERATE INCOME DENSITY BONUS
DRAFT
7 3085689.2
Percentage Moderate Income
Units
Percentage Density Bonus
10 5
11 6
12 7
13 8
14 9
15 10
16 11
17 12
18 13
19 14
20 15
21 16
22 17
23 18
24 19
25 20
26 21
27 22
28 23
29 24
30 25
31 26
32 27
33 28
34 29
35 30
36 31
37 32
38 33
39 34
40 35
41 38.75
42 42.5
43 46.25
44 50

4. Senior Citizen Housing Development. A Senior Citizen Housing Development, including Shared Housing Building developments, shall be eligible for a 20% density bonus, unless otherwise prohibited by state and/or federal law.

5. Qualifying Mobilehome Park. A Qualifying Mobilehome Park shall be eligible for a 20% density bonus, including shared housing building developments, unless otherwise prohibited by state and/or federal law.

DRAFT
8 3085689.2

6. Specialized Housing Developments. A specialized housing development for transitional foster youth, disabled veterans, or homeless persons, in which at least 10% of the total units are provided at the same affordability level as very low income units shall be eligible for a 20% density bonus. The units described in this subsection shall be subject to a recorded affordability restriction of 55 years and shall be provided at the same affordability level as very low income units.

7. Student Housing Developments.
a. A student housing development shall be eligible for a density bonus as shown in Table 20.42.030.A.4, only if all of the following requirements are met:

TABLE 20.42.030.A.4

STUDENT HOUSING DEVELOPMENT DENSITY BONUS
Percentage Low Income Units Percentage Density Bonus
20 35
21 38.75
22 42.5
23 46.25
24 50
b. At least 20% of the total dwelling units will be used for lower income students. Such units must be use and occupied by lower income students. c. For purposes of calculating a density bonus granted pursuant to this subparagraph, the term "unit" as used in this subparagraph means one rental bed and its pro rata share of the associated common area facilities. The units described in this subsection shall be subject to an affordability restriction of 55 years, which shall not tie any rental bed reserved for lower income students to a specific bedroom. In addition, lower income students shall be allowed to share a room or unit with a non-lower income student.
d. All units will be used exclusively for undergraduate, graduate, or professional students enrolled full time at an institution of higher education accredited by the Western Association of Schools and Colleges or the Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges. Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy, the applicant shall provide evidence that the developer has done one of the following:
i. Entered into an operating agreement or master lease with one or more institutions of higher education for the institution(s) to occupy all units of the student housing development with students from that institution(s). ii. Established a system for confirming its renters’ status as students to ensure that all units of the student housing development are occupied with students from an institution of higher education.

DRAFT
9 3085689.2
e. The rent provided in the applicable units of the development for lower income students shall be calculated at 30% of 65% of the area median income for a single-room occupancy unit type.
f. The applicant shall provide priority for the applicable affordable units for lower income students experiencing homelessness. A homeless service provider, as defined in Cal. Health and Safety Code § 103577(e)(3), or institution of higher education that has knowledge of a person's homeless status may verify a person's status as homeless for purposes of this subclause.

8. One Hundred Percent Affordable Housing Development.
a. A 100% rental or for-sale development, including total units and density bonus units, but exclusive of manager's unit or units, for lower income households, except that 20% of the units in the development, including total units and density bonus units, may be for moderate income households, shall be eligible for an 80% density bonus. For rental units, rents shall be restricted as set forth in Cal. Gov’t. Code § 65915(c)(1)(B)(ii).
b. No maximum density controls shall be imposed if any of the following apply:
i. The housing development is located in a very low vehicle travel area within a designated county.
ii. The development is located within one-half mile of a major transit stop.

9. Land donations. A tentative subdivision map, parcel map, or other residential development applicant that donates land to the City for the development of affordable units for very low income households shall be eligible for a density bonus as shown in Table 20.42.030.A.5, only if all of the following requirements are met:

TABLE 20.42.030.A.5

LAND DONATION DENSITY BONUS
Percentage Very Low Income
Units
Percentage Density Bonus
10 15
11 16
12 17
13 18
14 19
15 20
16 21
17 22
18 23
19 24
20 25
21 26
22 27
DRAFT
10 3085689.2
23 28
24 29
25 30
26 31
27 32
28 33
29 34
30 35
a. The land shall be at least one net acre or of sufficient size to permit development of at least 40 units.
b. The zoning and general plan designations that allow development at the density of at least 30 units per acre.
c. Notwithstanding Subsections a and b above, the developable acreage and zoning classification of the land shall be sufficient to permit construction of units affordable to very low income households in an amount not less than 10% of the number of residential units of the proposed development. d. The land shall or will be served by adequate public facilities and infrastructure.
e. The land shall be within the boundary of the proposed development or within one-quarter mile of the boundary of the proposed development. f. No later than the date of approval of the final subdivision map, parcel map, or of the residential development, the land donation shall have all of the permits and approvals, other than building permits, necessary for the development of the affordable units for very low income households on the donated land, except that the City may subject the proposed development to subsequent design review, to the extent authorized by subdivision (i) of Cal.

Gov’t. Code § 65583.2, if the design is not reviewed by the City prior to the time of donation.
g. The applicant shall donate and transfer land no later than the date of approval of the final subdivision map, parcel map, or residential development application.
h. The land shall be transferred to the City or to a housing developer approved by the Director. The Director may require the applicant to identify and transfer the land to a housing developer.
i. A proposed source of funding for the very low income units shall be identified not later than the date of approval of the final subdivision map, parcel map, or residential development application.
j. The affordable units built on the donated land shall remain restricted to an affordable rent for very low income households for a period of at least 55 years, or a longer period of time if required by the construction or mortgage financing assistance program, mortgage insurance program, or rental subsidy program except as otherwise provided for by Cal. Gov’t Code § 65915.

DRAFT
11 3085689.2
k. The Density Bonus pursuant to this subsection shall be in addition to any increase in density mandated by Subsections 20.42.030.A.1 through 8, up to a maximum combined density increase of 35% if an applicant seeks both the increase required pursuant to this subsection and Subsections 20.42.030.A.1 through 8.

10. Condominium Conversion. An applicant requesting an approval of a condominium conversion pursuant to Chapter 20.12 of this title may request a density bonus of up to 25% over the number of apartments otherwise permitted by this title, to be provided within the existing structure or structures proposed for conversion, if it meets all of the following:
a. Affordable units shall be provided in accordance with one of the following two options:
i. Low or moderate Income. At least 33% of the total units of the proposed condominium project, including any units that are granted by a density bonus, shall be affordable units to low or moderate income households, or ii. Lower Income. At least 15% of the total units of the proposed condominium project, including any units that are granted by a density bonus, shall be affordable units to lower income households.
b. An applicant for condominium conversion shall comply with and submit all required application material specified in Chapter 20.12 of this title. Nothing in this section shall be construed to require the City to approve a proposal to convert apartments to a condominium project.
c. An Applicant shall be ineligible for a density bonus or other Incentives under this section if it meets any of the following criteria:
i. The apartments proposed for conversion constitute a housing development for which a density bonus or other incentives were already provided under this chapter.
ii. The condominium conversion project is located on any property specified in Section 20.42.030.C.
d. The City may place such reasonable conditions on the granting of the density bonus or other incentives pursuant to this section, as it finds appropriate, including, but not limited to, conditions which assure continued affordability of units to subsequent purchasers of lower, low and moderate income households. e. In lieu of receiving a density bonus as specified in this section, the applicant for qualifying condominium conversion may request and the City shall provide other incentives of equivalent financial value. i. For purposes of this subsection, “other incentives of equivalent financial value” shall not be construed to require the City to provide cash transfer payments or other monetary compensation, but may include the reduction or waiver of requirements which the City might otherwise apply as conditions of conversion approval.

C. Ineligibility.

DRAFT
12 3085689.2

1. A housing development shall be ineligible for a density bonus or any other provisions of this chapter if the development is proposed on any property that includes a parcel or parcels on which rental dwelling units are located or, if the dwelling units have been vacated or demolished in the five-year period preceding the density bonus application, have been subject to a recorded covenant, ordinance, or law that restricts rents to levels affordable to persons and families of lower and very low income; subject to any other form of rent or price control through the City’s valid exercise of its police power; or occupied by lower or very low income households, unless the proposed housing development replaces those units, and either of the following applies:
i. The proposed housing development, inclusive of the units replaced pursuant to this paragraph, contains affordable units at the percentages set forth in Section 20.42.030.
ii. Each unit in the development, exclusive of a manager’s unit or units, is affordable to, and occupied by, either a lower or very low income household.

2. For the purposes of this subsection, “replace” shall mean as defined in Cal. Gov’t. Code § 65915(c)(3)(B)(i) and (ii).

20.42.040 ADDITIONAL DENSITY BONUSES
A. Additional Affordable Units.

1. Provided that the housing development would not restrict more than 50% of the total units to very low income, lower income, or moderate income households, the City shall grant an additional density bonus as specified in this subsection if the housing development conforms to the requirements of Section

20.42.030, and meets any of the following requirements:
a. The housing development provides at least 15% of the total units for very low income households.
b. The housing development provides at least 24% of the total units for lower income households.
c. The housing development provides at least 44% of the total units for moderate income households.

2. To qualify for the additional density bonus under this subsection, the applicant shall agree to include additional rental or for-sale units affordable to very low income households or moderate income households The additional density bonus granted under this subsection shall be calculated as shown in Table 20.42.040.A below.

Table 20.42.040.A

ADDITIONAL DENSITY BONUS
Affordability Level Additional Percentage of
Affordable Housing Unit
Additional Density
Bonus Percentage
5 20
DRAFT
13 3085689.2
Very Low Income or
Moderate Income
6 22.5
7 25
8 27.5
9 30
10 32.5
Moderate Income
11 35
12 38.75
13 42.5
14 46.25
15 50
Notes:
1) The increase in density bonus specified in this table shall be in addition to any increase in density granted by Section 20.42.030.
2) The additional density bonus specified in this table shall be calculated using the number of units excluding any density bonus awarded by Section

20.42.030.

B. Childcare Facilities. The City shall grant an additional density bonus for a housing development that is eligible for a density bonus under Section 20.42.030 and includes a childcare facility that will be located on the premises of, as part of, or adjacent to, the development.

1. The additional density bonus shall be in an amount of square feet of residential space that is equal to or greater than the square footage of the childcare facility.

2. The childcare facility shall meet the following requirements:
a. The childcare facility shall remain in operation for a period of time that is as long as or longer than the period of time during which the provided affordable units are required to remain affordable pursuant to Section 20.42.050. b. Of the children who attend the childcare facility, the children of very low, lower, and moderate income households shall equal a percentage that is equal to or greater than the percentage of affordable units in the development that are required for very low, lower, and moderate income households pursuant to Section 20.42.030.

20.42.050 GENERAL STANDARDS FOR AFFORDABLE UNITS
A. Affordable units shall be constructed concurrently with market-rate units within a Housing Development.

B. Rental Units.

1. Very low and low income rental units shall remain restricted to an affordable rent for a period of 55 years or a longer period of time if required by a construction or mortgage financing assistance program, mortgage insurance program, or rental subsidy program.

DRAFT
14 3085689.2

2. For housing developments meeting the criteria of Section 20.42.030.B.8 of this chapter, affordable rents for all units, including both base density and density bonus units, shall be as follows:
a. The rent for at least 20% of the units shall be set at an affordable rent, as defined in Cal. Health and Safety Code § 50053.
b. The rent for remaining units in the development shall be set at an amount consistent with the maximum rent levels for lower income households, as those rents and incomes are determined by the California Tax Credit Allocation Committee.

C. For Sale Units.

1. An Applicant for a for-sale housing development that utilizes the density bonus provisions of this chapter shall ensure that the affordable unit is initially sold to and occupied by persons and families of very low, low, or moderate income, as required, and that the affordable units are offered at an affordable sales price.
a. If the affordable unit is not purchased by an income-qualified person or family within 180 days after the issuance of the certificate of occupancy, the unit may be purchased by a qualified nonprofit housing corporation that meets all of the following requirements pursuant to a recorded contract that satisfies all of the requirements specified in paragraph (10) of subdivision (a) of Cal. Rev. and Tax.

Code § 402.1:
i. The nonprofit corporation has a determination letter from the Internal Revenue Service affirming its tax-exempt status pursuant to the Internal Revenue Code § 501(c)(3) of and is not a private foundation as that term is defined in the Internal Revenue Code §509.
ii. The primary activity of the nonprofit corporation is the development and preservation of affordable home ownership housing in California that incorporates within their contracts for initial purchase a repurchase option that requires a subsequent purchaser of the property that desires to resell or convey the property to offer the qualified nonprofit corporation the right to repurchase the property prior to selling or conveying that property to any other purchaser pursuant to an equity sharing agreement or affordability restrictions on the sale and conveyance of the property that ensure that the property will be preserved for Lower Income housing for at least 45 years for owner-occupied housing units and will be sold or resold only to persons or families of very low, low, or moderate Income, as defined in Cal. Health and Safety Code §50052.5.

2. The City shall enforce an equity-sharing agreement, unless it is in conflict with the requirements of another public funding source or law. The following shall apply to the equity sharing agreement:
a. Upon resale, the seller of the unit shall retain the value of any improvements, the down payment, and the seller’s proportionate share of appreciation.
b. The City shall recapture any initial subsidy, if applicable, and its proportionate share of appreciation, which shall then be used within five years DRAFT
15 3085689.2
for any of the purposes described in Cal. Health and Safety Code § 33334.2(e) that promote homeownership.
i. The City’s proportionate share of appreciation shall be equal to the ratio of the local government’s initial subsidy to the fair market value of the home at the time of initial sale.
ii. The City's initial subsidy, if applicable, shall be equal to the fair market value of the home at the time of initial sale minus the initial sale price of the affordable unit, plus the amount of any down payment assistance or mortgage assistance. If upon resale the market value is lower than the initial market value, then the value at the time of the resale shall be used as the initial market value. d. If the unit is purchased or developed by a qualified nonprofit housing corporation pursuant to Subsection 20.42.050.C.1.a of this chapter, the City may enter into a contract with the qualified nonprofit housing corporation under which the qualified nonprofit housing corporation would recapture any initial subsidy and its proportionate share of appreciation, if the qualified nonprofit housing corporation is required to use 100% of the proceeds to promote homeownership for lower income households as defined by Cal. Health and Safety Code § 50079.5 within the jurisdiction of the City.

D. In determining the maximum affordable rent or affordable sales price of affordable units, the presumed household size as set forth in the City’s Affordable Housing Guidelines shall be used, unless the development is subject to different assumptions imposed by other governmental regulations.

E. Affordable units shall be built on-site and be dispersed throughout the project site. The number of bedrooms of the affordable units shall be equivalent to the bedroom mix of the market-rate units in the development; except that the applicant may include a higher proportion of affordable units with more bedrooms. The design, square footage, appearance and general quality of the affordable units shall be compatible with the design of the market-rate units in the development. The development shall comply with all applicable development standards, except those which may be modified as provided by this chapter.

F. When an applicant proposes to construct a housing development that conforms to the requirements of Subsections 20.42.030.B.1 and 2 that is a shared housing building, such development is not subject to any minimum unit size requirements or minimum bedroom requirements that are in conflict with the definition of shared housing building or unit.

G. A Regulatory Agreement, as described in Section 20.42.110, shall be required of all developments proposed pursuant to this chapter. The Regulatory Agreement shall be recorded as a restriction on the development. The Regulatory Agreement shall be consistent with the City’s Affordable Housing Guidelines.

20.42.060 DEVELOPMENT INCENTIVES
DRAFT
16 3085689.2
A. An applicant that meets the requirements for a density bonus as specified in this chapter shall be granted the number of incentives identified in Table

20.42.060.A, unless otherwise noted.

TABLE 20.42.060.A
NUMBER OF INCENTIVES BY LEVEL OF AFFORDABILITY1
Level of
Affordability
Minimum Percentage of
Affordable Units Number of Incentive2 3
Lower Income
10% 1
17% 2
24% 3
100% (up to 20% can be
moderate income)2 5
Very Low
Income
5% 1
10% 2
15% 3
16% 4
100% (up to 20% can be
moderate income)2 5
Moderate
Income (forsale units
only)
10% 1
20% 2
30% 3
45% 4
Student
Housing
Development
20% lower income 1
23% lower income 2
Notes:

1. The City shall grant the request for incentives, unless the City makes a written finding, based on substantial evidence, as set forth in Cal. Gov’t.

Code § 65915(d)(1)(A) through (C) and (d)(4).

2. If the housing development is located within one-half mile of a major transit stop or in a very low vehicle travel area in a designated county, the project shall also receive a height increase of up to three additional stories, or 33 feet. The allowed height increase under this section shall not be counted towards the allowed number of Incentives.

B. One additional Incentive shall be granted if the housing development is eligible for a density bonus under Section 20.42.030 and includes a childcare facility that meets the requirements of Subsection 20.42.040.B.

20.42.070 PARKING RATIOS.

A. General. Upon request by the applicant, a development that is eligible for a density bonus pursuant to this chapter may utilize the related parking ratios shown in Table 20.42.070.A, inclusive of parking for persons with a disability, guests and EVs.

DRAFT
17 3085689.2
TABLE 20.42.070.A

REDUCED PARKING RATIOS
Total Number of Bedrooms Minimum Number of Required Parking Spaces per Unit
Studio unit 1
1-bedroom 1
2-bedrooms 1.5
3-bedrooms 1.5
4 or more bedrooms 2.5
B. Additional Reduction. Upon request by the applicant, the following housing developments may utilize related additionally reduced parking ratios shown in Table 20.42.070.B, inclusive of parking for persons with a disability, guests, and EVs.

TABLE 20.42.070.B
ADDITIONALLY REDUCED PARKING RATIOS1
Type of Density
Bonus Housing
Development
Minimum Number of
Required Parking
Spaces
Special Provisions2
Rental and for-sale
housing development
with minimum 11%
very low income or
20% lower income
units

0.5 per unit
Must be located within
one-half mile of a major
transit stop and have an
unobstructed access to
that major transit stop
For-sale housing
development with
minimum 40%
moderate income units

0.5 per bedroom
Must be located within
one-half mile of a major
transit stop and have an
unobstructed access to
that major transit stop
Rental and for-sale
housing development
with 100% of units for
lower income
household (except
20% can be for
moderate income
household), exclusive
of a manager's unit(s)
No minimum number of
parking space required
Must be located within
one-half mile of a major
transit stop and have an
unobstructed access to
that major transit stop
Rental housing
development with
No minimum number of
parking space required
Must have either a
paratransit service or an
DRAFT
18 3085689.2
100% of units for lower
income individuals who
are 55 years of age or
older that complies with
Cal. Civil Code §§ 51.2
and 51.3 (except 20%
can be for moderate
income household),
exclusive of a
manager's unit(s)
unobstructed access to
a fixed bus route service
that operates at least
eight times a day within
one-half mile from the
development
Special Needs Housing
Development with
100% of units for lower
income household, as
defined in Cal. Health
and Safety Code §
51312 or supportive
housing developments,
as defined in Cal.

Health and Safety
Code § 50675.14,
(except 20% can be for
moderate income
household), exclusive
of a manager's unit(s)
No minimum number of
parking space required
Must have either a
paratransit service or an
unobstructed access to
a fixed bus route service
that operates at least
eight times a day within
one-half mile of the
development
Notes:

1. The City may require an increase in the minimum number of required parking spaces, not to exceed that established by Table 20.42.070.A, if supported by a qualified parking study pursuant to Cal. Gov’t. Code § 65915(p)(7).

2. “An unobstructed access” to a major transit stop or a fixed bus route means a resident is able to access the major transit stop or a fixed bus route without encountering natural or constructed impediments. “Natural or constructed impediments” includes freeways, rivers, mountains, and bodies of water, but does not include residential structures, shopping centers, parking lots, or rails used for transit.

C. If the total number of spaces required results in a fractional number, it shall be rounded up to the next whole number. For purposes of this subsection, the housing development may provide on-site parking through tandem parking or uncovered parking, but not through on-street parking.

D. The parking ratios offered in this section shall not count as one of the incentives applicants are entitled to under Section 20.42.060.

20.42.080 WAIVER OR MODIFICATION OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS DRAFT
19 3085689.2
A. At the Applicant’s request, a housing development is eligible for the waiver or modification of development standards, if such standards will have the effect of physically precluding the construction of a housing development that meets the eligibility criteria for density bonus established by this chapter at the densities or with the incentives permitted by this chapter.

1. Exception. A housing development consistent with Subsection

20.42.030.B.8.b.ii that receives a waiver from any maximum controls on density shall not be eligible for waivers or modifications to development standards pursuant to this section.

2. The City may deny a request for a waiver or modification of development standards under this section if the City makes a written finding, with substantial evidence, that such request would have a specific, adverse impact, as defined in Cal. Gov’t. § 65589.5(d)(2), upon health and safety, upon any real property that is listed in the California Register of Historical Resources, or contrary to state or federal law, where there is no feasible method to satisfactorily mitigate or avoid the specific, adverse impact.

B. The waiver or modification of development standards requested under this section shall neither reduce nor increase the number of Incentives permitted by this chapter.

20.42.090 APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS
An application for a density bonus, incentive, waiver or modification of development standards, or revised parking standard shall be made as follows:

A. Any request pursuant to this chapter shall be processed concurrently with any other application(s) required for the housing development, including but not limited to those including discretionary land use decisions. The granting of a density bonus, incentive, waiver or modification of development standards, or revised parking standard pursuant to this chapter is a ministerial review, and shall not be interpreted, in and of itself, to require a General Plan amendment, zoning reclassification, or other discretionary approval.

1. The Director is the review authority for all requests pursuant to this chapter, except for requests for direct financial assistance.

2. Any requests for direct financial assistance requires the City Council review at a public hearing held in accordance with the procedures set forth for public hearing in this title.

B. All applications shall be submitted on a form prescribed by the City and shall include the following information:

1. The name of the proposed development, including the total number of proposed base units, affordable units, and density bonus units proposed.

2. A description of any density bonus, incentive, waiver or modification, or reduction in parking standard being requested.

3. Level of affordability of the affordable units and proposed method.

DRAFT
20 3085689.2

4. Documentation demonstrating the housing development’s eligibility for a requested density bonus, incentive, and/or reduction in parking standard, which may include, not limited to, how the requested Incentive would result in the actual cost reduction.

5. If a waiver or modification of development standards is requested, a brief explanation of how such development standards would physically preclude the construction of the housing development at the densities or with the incentives permitted by this chapter.

6. If a density bonus is requested by providing a land donation, the application shall show the location of the land to be dedicated, provide proof of site control, and provide evidence that all of the requirements of Subsection

20.42.030.B.9 of this chapter and Cal. Gov’t. Code § 65915(g) can be met;

7. If a density bonus or incentive is requested for a childcare facility, the application shall show the location and square footage of the childcare facilities and provide evidence that all of the requirements of Subsection 20.42.040.B.2 of this chapter and Cal. Gov’t. Code § 65915(h) can be met.

8. If a density bonus or Incentive is requested for a condominium conversion, the Applicant shall provide evidence that all of the requirements of Subsection

20.42.030.B.9 of this chapter and Cal. Gov’t. Code § 65915.5 can be met.

20.42.100 REVIEW PROCEDURES
A. An application for a density bonus, Incentive, or waiver or modification of development standards shall be acted upon by the approval authority concurrently with the application for a housing development. The granting of a density bonus shall not be deemed approval of the entire housing development.

B. The City shall grant the requested density bonus, incentive, waiver or modification of development standards, or revised parking standard, unless it makes a written finding, based on substantial evidence, of one of the following:

1. The incentive does not result in identifiable and actual cost reductions required to provide for affordable rents or affordable sales prices.

2. The Incentive would have a specific, adverse impact upon public health or safety, the physical environment, or on real property listed in the California Register of Historic Resources, and there is no feasible method to satisfactorily mitigate or avoid the specific adverse impact without rendering the development unaffordable to lower and moderate income households. For the purpose of this section, “specific adverse impact” means a significant, quantifiable, direct, and unavoidable impact, based on objective, identified, written public health or safety standards, policies, or conditions as they existed on the date that the application for the development was deemed complete.

3. The waiver or modification of development standards would not physically preclude the construction of the housing development at the densities or with the incentives permitted by this chapter.

DRAFT
21 3085689.2

4. The incentive, or waiver or modification of development standards is contrary to state or federal law.

C. Any decision denying a density bonus, incentive, waiver, modification or revised parking standard is subject to appeal pursuant to Chapter 20.424 within 10 days of the date of the decision.

20.42.110 REGULATORY AGREEMENT
A. Applicants for a density bonus, Incentive, waiver or modification of development standards, or revised parking standard shall enter into an affordable housing agreement with the City in a form acceptable to the City Attorney, and executed by the City Manager or their designee, to ensure that all the requirements of this chapter are satisfied.

B. The affordable housing agreement for projects utilizing provisions of this chapter shall include, but not limited to, the following:

1. A description of any density bonus, incentive, waiver or modification of development standards, or revised parking standard included in the housing development.

2. The total number of dwelling units approved for the housing development, including the number of affordable units.

3. Level of affordability for affordable units and the standards for determining the corresponding affordable rent or affordable sales price.

4. The location, dwelling unit sizes (square feet), and number of bedrooms of the affordable units.

5. Minimum affordability term required for affordable units as required by this chapter.

6. A construction schedule for completion and occupancy of affordable units.

7. A description of remedies for breach of the agreement.

8. Provisions for sale and resale restrictions for for-sale affordable units as specified in Subsection 20.42.050.C of this chapter.

9. Other provisions to ensure implementation and compliance with this section.

20.42.120 ENFORCEMENT
A. The Director, or their designee, may suspend, revoke, or deny any building permit or other approval upon finding a violation of any provision of this chapter.

The provisions of this chapter shall apply to all owners, agents, and successors of an applicant proposing a project. No entitlement approval, grading permit, building permit or certificate of occupancy shall be issued if it is found in noncompliance with the provisions of this chapter.

DRAFT
22 3085689.2
B. Any individual or entity who sells or rents an affordable unit in violation of the provisions of this chapter shall be required to forfeit all monetary gains obtained through noncompliance. Recovered funds shall be deposited into the Affordable Housing Trust Fund.

C. Selling or renting an affordable unit in violation of the provisions of this chapter is a violation of the City Code. The City may use any appropriate legal actions or proceedings necessary to ensure compliance with this chapter, including:

1. Actions to revoke, suspend, or deny any grading permit, building permit, certificate of occupancy, or discretionary approval.

2. Any other action, civil or criminal, authorized by law or by any regulatory document, restriction, or agreement in this chapter.

D. The City shall be entitled to recover its reasonable attorney's fees and costs.

SECTION 3. CEQA. The City Council finds that it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility the adoption of this Ordinance may have a significant effect on the environment because it enacts zoning code amendment that will not have a significant effect on the environment. It is therefore exempt from California Environmental Quality Act review pursuant to Title 14, Section 15061(b)(3) of the California Code of Regulations.

SECTION 4. SEVERABILITY.

If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance, is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions thereof be declared invalid or unconstitutional.

SECTION 5. EFFECTIVE DATE.

DRAFT
23 3085689.2
This Ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days after its adoption in accordance with the provisions of California law.

SECTION 6. CERTIFICATION.

The City Clerk shall certify to the passage of this Ordinance.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, this __ day of ___, 2025. _________________________________
Blair Stewart
Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________________
Lillian Harris-Neal
City Clerk
I, Lillian Harris-Neal, City Clerk of the City of Brea, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Brea, DRAFT
24 3085689.2
held on the 6th day of May, 2025, and was finally passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Brea on the __ day of ____, 2025, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

Dated:_____________________
_____________________________
City Clerk
City of Brea
Planning Commission Communication
B. ZOTA No. 2025-01: Density Bonus Ordinance
An amendment to the Zoning Code to codify the State Density Bonus law Meeting
Tuesday, March 25, 2025, 6:00 PM
Agenda Group
PUBLIC HEARINGS Item: 3B.

TO
Chair and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM
Joanne Hwang, City Planner

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The City has initiated a Zoning Code Text Amendment (ZOTA) No. 2025-01 to add a new chapter (Chapter 20.42) to the Title 20 of the Brea City Code (BCC), or the Zoning Code (Code), to codify the State Density Bonus law (State Law).

The above-mentioned entitlement herein is referred to as the “Project.”

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt a resolution (Attachment A) recommending the City Council take the following actions:

1. Find the Project exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3); and

2. Adopt an ordinance approving ZOTA No. 2025-01, amending Title 20 of the BCC by adding a new Chapter

20.42, as outlined in Exhibit A of the Attachment A.

BACKGROUND
The State Law, codified under California Government Code Section 65915, was originally adopted in 1976 to help address affordable housing needs in the state. Generally, the State Law requires local jurisdictions to grant a density bonus over the otherwise maximum allowable residential density defined in the General Plan when an applicant for an eligible housing development requests a density bonus. The State Law also requires local jurisdictions to grant certain incentives/concessions (Incentives), parking reductions, and waivers to development standards to help offset the cost of providing affordable housing. Since its original adoption, the State Law continued to be updated to further incentivize creation of affordable housing. Even though the City has not adopted its own density bonus ordinance, the City has been implementing and applying the State Law when requested by the developers, as required by and in compliance with the State Law.
4/17/25, 9:10 AM print.agendalink.app/v6/breaca/67c0ba3b23108a0054038d26 https://print.agendalink.app/v6/breaca/67c0ba3b23108a0054038d26 1/7

ATTACHMENT B
The City has a long history of encouraging various types of housing, which is evidenced by a different types of housing developments that have been approved and built in the City in previous years. In addition, in March 2024, the City was successful in receiving the Prohousing Jurisdiction Designation under the State Housing and Community Development (HCD)’s Prohousing Designation Program, a designation awarded to local jurisdictions with existing/proposed policies and program that encourage and facilitate development of housing. To date, the City remains as the only city with such designation in Orange County. In granting this designation, HCD required the City to adopt a local density bonus ordinance within a reasonable time period to further encourage housing developments in the City. The City’s 6th Cycle Housing Element also includes an implementation program (Program #6 Density Bonus Incentives) that requires an update to the City’s density bonus provisions.

DISCUSSION
The proposed amendment would codify the State Law in Title 20 of the BCC by introducing a new chapter, Chapter

20.42 (Density Bonus), which is provided as Attachment B to this report. The proposed density bonus provisions would implement the State Law, and the following are summary of the key provisions:

Applicability
A housing development with five or more units would qualify to utilize the density bonus provisions if it provides certain number of affordable units within the development.

Density Bonus
The City must grant a density bonus when requested by a qualifying housing development. The following table summarizes the allowable density bonus:

Table 1. General Density Bonus
Affordability Level
or Types of Housing
Percentage of
Affordable Units
Density Bonus
Percentage
Very low income 5 to 15% 20% to 50%
Low income 10 to 24% 20% to 50%
Moderate income 10 to 44% 5 to 50%
Senior citizen
housing & qualifying
mobile home park
N/A 20%
Specialized housing
with very low income
units
(i.e. foster youth, disabled
veterans, homeless persons)
10% 20%
Student housing with
lower income units 20 to 24% 35 to 50%
4/17/25, 9:10 AM print.agendalink.app/v6/breaca/67c0ba3b23108a0054038d26 https://print.agendalink.app/v6/breaca/67c0ba3b23108a0054038d26 2/7 100% affordable
housing with lower
income units
100%
(up to 20% can be
moderate income)
80%
Land donation for
very low income units 10% to 30% 15% to 35%
Condominium
conversion
33% low or
moderate income;
15% lower income
25%
In addition to the general density bonus described above, the City must also grant an additional density bonus if a qualifying housing development provides additional units affordable to very low or moderate income households and/or includes an on-site childcare facility. The following table summarizes the allowed additional density bonus:

Table 2. Additional Density Bonus
Affordability Level or
Types of Housing
Percentage of
Affordable Units
Density Bonus
Percentage
*Very low income 5 to 10% 20 to 32.5%
*Moderate income 5 to 15% 20 to 50%
Housing
development with
childcare facility
N/A
In an amount of
square feet or
residential space
that is equal to or
greater than the
square footage of
the childcare
facility
* In order for a housing development to qualify for an additional density bonus, the housing development must also provide at least 15% very low, 24% lower, or 44% moderate income units, and cannot restrict more than 50% of total units as very low, lower or moderate income units.

It should be noted that housing development would not be eligible to utilize the density bonus provisions in general if such housing development includes the demolition or vacation of existing affordable rental housing units occupied by lower or very low-income households. This provision would apply to units that were subject to any recorded covenant, ordinance, law, or any form of rent/price control that restricts rents to lower or very lowincome, persons and families, in the previous five-year period. In order for such housing developments to become eligible to utilize density bonus provision, they must provide the same amount of affordable units as the existing development.

Incentives and Waivers
4/17/25, 9:10 AM print.agendalink.app/v6/breaca/67c0ba3b23108a0054038d26 https://print.agendalink.app/v6/breaca/67c0ba3b23108a0054038d26 3/7 The City must grant certain number of Incentives when requested by a qualifying housing development. Number of allowed Incentives are based on the level of affordability and number of affordable units provided within the qualifying housing developments. Incentives include, but not limited to, reduction in development standards, modification of zoning code requirements, approval of mixed-use zoning, and other regulatory incentives proposed by an applicant. In addition, the City must allow modification or waiver of a development standard that has an effect of physically precluding development of affordable housing (Waivers) when requested by a qualifying housing development. There is no limit on the number of Waivers that a qualifying housing development can request. The following table summarizes the allowable Incentives and Waivers:

Table 3. Allowable Incentives and Waivers
Affordability
Level or Types
of Housing
Minimum
Percentage of
Affordable
Units
Number of
Incentives/Waivers
Incentives
Very low
income
10%
17%
24%
100%
1 2
3 5
Lower income
5%
10%
15%
16%
100%
1 2
3 4
5 Moderate
income
(for-sale unit
only)
10%
20%
30%
45%
1 2
3 4
Student
housing with
lower income
20%
30%
1 2
Waivers Any project that qualifies to
utilize the State Law Unlimited
Notes:

1. Additional Incentive related to height available for housing development located within ½ mile of a major transit stop

2. One additional number of Incentive available for housing development that includes a childcare facility
4/17/25, 9:10 AM print.agendalink.app/v6/breaca/67c0ba3b23108a0054038d26 https://print.agendalink.app/v6/breaca/67c0ba3b23108a0054038d26 4/7 It is important to note that the qualifying housing developments are entitled to these Incentives and Waivers as a matter of right, unless the City finds, with substantial evidence, that the waivers or reduction of development standards would have a specific adverse impact upon health, or safety, and for which there is no feasible method to satisfactorily mitigate or avoid the specific adverse impact, would have an adverse impact on any real property that is listed in the California Register of Historical Resources, or would be contrary to State or Federal law.

Parking Ratios
The City must allow, if requested by a qualifying housing development, a density bonus parking ratio as specified in the State Law. The following table provides the density bonus parking ratio compared to the BCC requirement:

Table 4. Density Bonus Parking Ratios
Minimum Number of Required Parking Per Unit
Total Number of
Bedrooms
BCC
Density Bonus
Law3
Single-Family1 Multi-Family2
Studio unit
2 1.5 1
1-bedroom 1.75 1
2-bedrooms 2 1.5
3-bedrooms

2.5 1.5
4 or more bedrooms 2.5
Guest parking 0.5 0.2 None
1 spaces for units – must be covered; guest spaces – can be covered/uncovered
2 spaces for units – a portion must be covered; guest spaces - can be covered/uncovered
3 can be either covered/uncovered
In addition, certain types of housing developments would be eligible for additionally reduced density bonus parking ratios, as follows:

Table 5. Additionally Reduced Density Bonus Parking Ratio Type of Density Bonus Housing Development Minimum Number of Required Parking Spaces
Housing development with minimum 11% very
low income or 20% lower income units 0.5 per unit
4/17/25, 9:10 AM print.agendalink.app/v6/breaca/67c0ba3b23108a0054038d26 https://print.agendalink.app/v6/breaca/67c0ba3b23108a0054038d26 5/7 For-sale housing development with minimum
40% moderate income units 0.5 per bedroom
Housing development with 100% of units for
lower income household
No minimum number of
parking space required
Senior rental housing development with 100% of
units for lower income individuals
No minimum number of
parking space required
Special needs housing development with 100%
of units for lower income household
No minimum number of
parking space required
Note: In general, to qualify for additional reduction in parking, the housing development must be located within ½ mile of major transit stop and have an unobstructed access to that major transit stop
General Standards
The proposed Density Bonus chapter would establish a number of general standards for the affordable units to be created within the housing developments that proposes to utilize the density bonus provisions. Summary of key standards are as follows:

Table 6. General Standards for Affordable Units
Summary
Construction Timing Affordable units must be built concurrently with rest of the housing development
Length of Affordability Rental units: minimum 55 years
For-sale units: equity-share
General Requirements
Affordable units must be:

Built on-site
Integrated/dispersed throughout the
development
Comparable in bedroom mix, design, and
quality as the market-rate units
Regulatory agreement required

PUBLIC NOTICE AND COMMENTS
This Project was noticed in accordance with the City’s public noticing requirements, which involved publication in the Brea Star-Progress. The public hearing notice for this Project is provided as Attachment C. As of the writing of this report, staff has not received public comments.

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
4/17/25, 9:10 AM print.agendalink.app/v6/breaca/67c0ba3b23108a0054038d26 https://print.agendalink.app/v6/breaca/67c0ba3b23108a0054038d26 6/7 The Project has been assessed in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines and the environmental regulations of the City. The Project is categorically exempt from the requirements to prepare additional environmental documentation per CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3) because the Project is limited to establishing a local density bonus ordinance, which would implement the State Law and therefore would not result in any physical changes to the environment. As such, the proposed amendments will not have a significant impact on the environment. Any future housing development would be subject to CEQA review.

CONCLUSION
The proposed Zoning Code Text Amendment is consistent with the State’s Density Bonus Law, implements the Housing Element Program #6, and is required for the City to maintain its Prohousing Jurisdiction designation. As such, staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the proposed Zoning Code Text Amendment to the City Council.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED:

Joanne Hwang, AICP, City Planner
Attachments
ATTACHMENT A - Draft PC Resolution.pdf
ATTACHMENT B - Exhibit A to PC Reso.pdf
ATTACHMENT C - Public Hearing Notice.pdf
4/17/25, 9:10 AM print.agendalink.app/v6/breaca/67c0ba3b23108a0054038d26 https://print.agendalink.app/v6/breaca/67c0ba3b23108a0054038d26 7/7

CITY OF BREA
CITY COUNCIL NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT AMENDMENT NO. 2025-01.

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN by the City of Brea that a public hearing will be held at a City Council Meeting on Tuesday, May 6, 2025 at 7:00 P.M., or as soon thereafter as the matter can be heard, in the Council Chambers of the City of Brea Civic & Cultural Center, 1 Civic Center Circle, Brea, California 92821, in accordance with State Law and the Brea City Code, to consider the following application:

REQUEST: The City of Brea requests approval of the following entitlement: Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment (ZOTA) No. 2025-01 to codify the State Density Bonus Law in the Brea City Code (BCC), by creating a new chapter (Chapter

20.42).

LOCATION: Citywide

PLANNING

COMMISSION
RECOMMENDATION:

At the March 25, 2025 Planning Commission meeting, the Planning Commission, on a 5-0 vote, recommended that the City Council approve the proposed ZOTA No. 2025-01.

ENVIRONMENTAL: The project has been assessed in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines and the environmental regulations of the City. The proposed zoning code text amendments are exempt from the requirements of the CEQA pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines.

ALL INTERESTED PERSONS ARE INVITED TO ATTEND SAID HEARING AND EXPRESS OPINIONS ON THE MATTERS OUTLINED ABOVE. FURTHER INFORMATION MAY BE OBTAINED BY CALLING THE PLANNING DIVISION AT (714) 990-7674 OR BY EMAIL AT [email protected]

IF YOU CHALLENGE PROJECT AND RELATED ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATIONS IN COURT,

YOU MAY BE LIMITED TO RAISING ONLY THOSE ISSUES YOU OR SOMEONE ELSE RAISED AT

THE PUBLIC HEARING DESCRIBED IN THIS NOTICE, OR IN WRITTEN CORRESPONDENCE, DELIVERED TO THE CITY COUNCIL AT, OR PRIOR TO, THE PUBLIC HEARING.

Lillian Harris-Neal
City Clerk
Publish: 04/10/2025

ATTACHMENT C

ATTACHMENT D

City of Brea
City Council Regular Meeting Communication
A. Backflow and Cross-Connection Controls Ordinance Update; Cross-Connection Control Management Policy Meeting
Tuesday, May 6, 2025, 7:00 PM
Agenda Group
ADMINISTRATIVE ITEMS Item: 4A.

TO
Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
FROM
Kristin Griffith, City Manager

RECOMMENDATION

1. Waive full reading and introduce Ordinance No. 1261, “An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Brea Amending the Brea City Code To Update Backflow and Cross-Connection Controls and Approving a CEQA Exemption Determination,” by title only; and

2. Adopt Resolution No. 2025-033 approving a Cross-Connection Control Management Plan.

BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION
The The State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB), via Assembly Bill 1671 (2017) (AB 1671), intends to build a foundation of awareness and education. This will be built within the regulated community regarding the importance of backflow protection and cross-connection control, leading to implementing a robust crossconnection control program for Public Water Systems (PWS). The SWRCB developed a Cross-Connection Control Policy Handbook (CCCPH) to protect public health. This policy establishes standards intended to ensure a PWS drinking water distribution system will not be subject to the backflow of liquids, gases, or other substances.

The CCCPH and its standards apply to all California Public Water Systems, as defined in Health and Safety Code (HSC) section 116275 (h). Compliance with the CCCPH is mandatory for all California PWS. Pursuant to HSC sections 116407 and 116555.5, the SWRCB chose to adopt standards for backflow protection and crossconnection control through the adoption of the CCCPH, which became effective July 1, 2024 and was amended on March 19, 2025.

Before AB 1671 and the CCCPH adoption, California's cross-connection control regulations were outlined in regulations in California Code of Regulations (CCR) Title 17.4, which was adopted in 1987 and minimally revised in 2000. Although still protective to public health, the CCR Title 17 cross-connection regulations required updating as the drinking water and cross-connection control industries have evolved. The CCCPH updates those regulations, which, as previously noted, are no longer operative following the adoption of the CCCPH.

Each PWS must have operating rules, ordinances, by-laws, or a resolution to implement the cross-connection program. The PWS must also have legal authority to implement corrective actions in the event a water user fails to comply in a timely manner with the PWS provisions regarding the installation, inspection, field testing, or maintenance of Backflow Prevention Assemblies (BPAs) required pursuant to the CCCPH.

To comply with the CCCPH, staff recommends adopting Ordinance No. 1261 and Resolution No. 2025-033. The ordinance will amend the City's existing backflow and cross-control restrictions, found in Chapter 13.16 of the City Code, so that the City is consistent and compliant with the SWRCB. The ordinance allows the City to implement the cross-connection program outlined by the CCCPH, which is specific to the City's requirements. The ordinance outlines the legal authority to implement corrective actions if a customer fails to comply promptly with the PWS provisions regarding installation, inspection, field testing, or maintenance of (BPAs) to prevent backflow into the City's public water system. The resolution approves a Cross-Connection Control Management Plan (CCCMP) for submission to the SWRCB and directs staff to enforce the CCCMP subject to any revisions required by the SWRCB.

This ordinance and resolution are exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) review pursuant to statutory and categorical exemptions, including California Code of Regulations Title 14, Section 15061(b)(3).).

FISCAL IMPACT/SUMMARY
The fiscal impact depends on the implementation of this updated backflow and cross-connection control program, which will be implemented by July 1, 2025. Most monitoring and enforcement shall be performed by in-house staff in conformance with the CCCPH, but in some cases, in-house staff will have to seek outside assistance via a consultant or the Orange County Healthcare Agency. There is no impact on the General Fund.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED:

Kristin Griffith, City Manager
Prepared by: Rudy Correa, Public Works Utilities Manager Concurrence: Michael Ho, PE, Public Works Director
Attachments
Attachment A - Draft Cross-Connection Control Management Plan Attachment B - Draft Ordinance No. 1261
Attachment C - Resolution
Attachment D - Redline - Brea City Code Chapter 13.16 Update City of Brea Cross Connec�on Control Management Plan (CCCMP) DRAFT 2025
Cross Connection Control
Management Plan
1 Civic Center Circle
Brea, CA 92821
Phone: 714-990-7600
www.cityofbrea.gov
This Cross Connection Control Management Plan
has been prepared in compliance with the
California State Water Board CCCPH.
_________________________________
Thomas R. Holliman
AWWA Certified Cross Connection Control Program
Specialist, No. 02726. Exp: 4/30/2026
City of Brea Cross Connec�on Control Management Plan (CCCMP) DRAFT City of Brea CCCMP – March 2025
i
Contents
1 Cross Connec�on Control Policy Overview...................................................................................... 1-1

1.1 Objec�ve .................................................................................................................................. 1-1

1.2 Applicability.............................................................................................................................. 1-1

1.3 Policy Development Background and Legal Authorities........................................................... 1-1

1.4 California Safe Drinking Water Act........................................................................................... 1-1

1.5 Acronyms and Abbrevia�ons................................................................................................... 1-3

1.6 Defini�ons and General Requirements.................................................................................... 1-4 2 Hazard Assessments and Required Protec�on ................................................................................ 2-1

2.1 Hazard Assessments................................................................................................................. 2-1

2.2 Hazard Assessment Process..................................................................................................... 2-2

2.2.1 Phase 1 - Commercial/Industrial Connec�ons with Backflow Protec�on....................... 2-2

2.2.2 Phase 2 - Commercial/Industrial Connec�ons without Backflow Protec�on ................. 2-3

2.2.3 Phase 3 – Residen�al Connec�ons without Backflow Protec�on ................................... 2-3 3 Opera�ng Rules or Ordinances........................................................................................................ 3-1 4 Backflow Preven�on ........................................................................................................................ 4-1

4.1 Backflow Preven�on Requirements......................................................................................... 4-1

4.2 Backflow Preven�on Assemblies.............................................................................................. 4-3

4.2.1 Standards for Types of Backflow Protec�on.................................................................... 4-3

4.2.2 Installa�on Criteria for Backflow Protection .................................................................... 4-4 5 Non-Testable Devices....................................................................................................................... 5-1

5.1 Non-testable backflow preventer tes�ng procedures............................................................. 5-1 6 Cer�fied Backflow Preven�on Assembly Testers and Cer�fied Cross-Connec�on Control Specialists 6-1

6.1 Backflow Tester Cer�fica�on ................................................................................................... 6-1

6.1.1 Backflow Tester List ......................................................................................................... 6-1

6.2 Cross-Connec�on Control Specialist Certification.................................................................... 6-2 7 Backflow Incident Response, Repor�ng and No�fica�on................................................................ 7-1

7.1 Backflow Incident Response Procedure................................................................................... 7-1 City of Brea Cross Connec�on Control Management Plan (CCCMP) DRAFT City of Brea CCCMP – March 2025
ii

7.2 Backflow Incident No�fica�on................................................................................................. 7-1 8 Cross-Connec�on Control Program Coordinator............................................................................. 8-1

8.1 Cross Connec�on Control Specialist Designee......................................................................... 8-2 9 Recordkeeping.................................................................................................................................. 9-1

9.1 Records Retained ..................................................................................................................... 9-1

9.2 Recordkeeping Policy and Procedures..................................................................................... 9-2

9.2.1 Residen�al Site Assessments........................................................................................... 9-2

9.2.2 Industrial/Commercial site assessments ......................................................................... 9-3 10 User Supervisors ............................................................................................................................ 10-4 11 Backflow Preven�on Assembly Tes�ng and Repor�ng.................................................................. 11-1

11.1 Backflow Tes�ng No�fica�on Process ................................................................................... 11-1

11.2 Damaged, missing, or improperly installed backflow preven�on assemblies....................... 11-2 12 Public Outreach and Educa�on...................................................................................................... 12-1 13 Local En�ty Coordina�on............................................................................................................... 13-1 Tables
Table 5-1 Loca�on of Non-Testable Backflow Preven�on Devices......................................................... 5-1 Appendices
Appendix A – What is a Cross Connection?
Appendix B - Assembly Bill 1671 (2017, Chapter 533)
Assembly Bill 1180 (2019, Chapter 455).

Appendix C - Municipal Code
Appendix D - Ordinance No.

Appendix E- High Hazard Premises
Appendix F - Assessment Database
Appendix G - Self Report Letter (Commercial/Industrial Assessments) Appendix H - Backflow Prevention Assembly Diagrams
Appendix I - City Records Retention Policy
Appendix J – Backflow Incident Response Form
Appendix K – Consumer Confidence Report
Appendix L – City Standard Specifications and/or Drawings City of Brea Cross Connec�on Control Management Plan (CCCMP) DRAFT City of Brea CCCMP – March 2025
1-1
1 Cross Connec�on Control Policy Overview

1.1 Objec�ve
The primary objective of the Cross-Connection Control Management Plan (CCCMP) is to bring the City into compliance with the Cross Connection Control Policy Handbook (CCCPH) developed by the State Water Resources Control Board (State Water Board) for the protection of public health through the establishment of standards intended to ensure a public water system’s (PWS) drinking water distribution system will not be subject to the backflow of liquids, gases, or other substances, see CCCMP Appendix A. In addition, by providing basic educational information on backflow prevention, the City intends to build a foundation of awareness within the City regarding the importance of backflow protection and crossconnection control, leading to the implementation of a robust cross-connection control program.

Per Section 3.1.4 (b)(1) description the City will implement the requirements of the State CCCPH by implementing ordinances and procedures as detailed in this CCCMP.

1.2 Applicability
The State CCCPH and its standards apply to all California PWSs, as defined in California’s Health and Safety Code (CHSC, section 116275 (h)). Compliance with the State CCCPH is mandatory for all California PWSs. The City’s CCCMP has been developed in conformance to the State CCCPH and is applicable to all customers within the City’s service area.

1.3 Policy Development Background and Legal Authorities Through the adoption of the State CCCPH, the State Water Board exercised its authority, under California’s Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA), to establish enforceable standards applicable to California’s PWSs. Failure to comply with the CCCMP which is in conformance with the State CCCPH may result in the issuance of compliance, enforcement, or other corrective actions against the City.

1.4 California Safe Drinking Water Act
On October 6, 2017, Assembly Bill 1671 (AB 1671) was approved and filed with the Secretary of State (see CCCMP Appendix B). AB 1671 amended California’s SDWA through the establishment of CHSC sections 116407 and 116555.5. AB 1671 also amended section 116810 of the CHSC, which is briefly discussed in CCCPH.

City of Brea Cross Connec�on Control Management Plan (CCCMP) DRAFT City of Brea CCCMP – March 2025
1-2
On October 2, 2019, Assembly Bill 1180 (AB 1180) was approved and filed with the Secretary of State. AB 1180 amended Section 116407 of the CHSC and added section 13521.2 to the Water Code. AB 1180 requires that the CCCPH include provisions for the use of a swivel or changeover device (swivel-ell), see CCCMP Appendix B.

Pursuant to sections 116407 and 116555.5 of the CHSC, the State Water Board chose to adopt standards for backflow protection and cross-connection control through the adoption of this State CCCPH, which became effective July 1, 2024.
• The State Water Board is required to adopt regulations for the control of crossconnections that it determines to be necessary for ensuring PWSs “distribute a reliable and adequate supply of pure, wholesome, potable, and healthy water.” (CHSC section 116375, subd. (c).)
• Any person who owns a PWS is required to ensure that the distribution system will not be subject to backflow under normal operating conditions. (CHSC section 116555, subd. (a)(2).)
Prior to AB 1671 and the adoption of the State CCCPH, California’s regulations pertaining to cross-connection control were set forth in regulations in CCR Title 17, which were adopted in 1987 with minor revisions in 2000. Although still protective to public health, the CCR Title 17 cross-connection regulations required updating as both the drinking water and crossconnection control industries had evolved. This State CCCPH updates those regulations, which as previously noted are no longer operative following the adoption of the State CCCPH.

The State Water Board may update its standards for backflow protection and crossconnection control through revisions of the State CCCPH. Prior to adopting substantive revisions to the State CCCPH, the State Water Board will consult with state and local agencies and persons identified as having expertise on the subject by the State Water Board, and the State Water Board will hold at least one public hearing to consider public comments.

City of Brea Cross Connec�on Control Management Plan (CCCMP) DRAFT City of Brea CCCMP – March 2025
1-3

1.5 Acronyms and Abbrevia�ons
As used in this policy, acronyms and abbreviations reference the following:

Acronym or Abbreviation Meaning
AB Assembly Bill
AG Air Gap separation
BAT Best Available Technology
BPA Backflow Prevention Assembly
Bus. & Prof. Code Business and Professional Code
CA California
CBSC California Building Standards Commission
CCCMP Cross Connection Control Management Plan
CCCPH Cross-Connection Control Policy Handbook
CCR California Code of Regulations
C.F.R. Code of Federal Regulations
CHSC California Health and Safety Code
City City of Brea
Civ. Code Civil Code
DC Double Check valve backflow prevention assembly
DCDA Double Check Detector backflow prevention Assembly DCDA-II Double Check Detector backflow prevention Assembly – type II
Division Division of Drinking Water
EPA Environmental Protection Agency
Gov. Code Government Code
MCL Maximum Contaminant Level
Muni Code Municipal Code
Pen. Code Penal Code
PVB Pressure Vacuum Breaker backsiphonage prevention
assembly
PWS Public Water System
RP Reduced Pressure principle backflow prevention assembly RPDA Reduced Pressure principle Detector backflow prevention Assembly
RPDA-II Reduced Pressure principle Detector backflow prevention Assembly – type II
RW Recycled Water
SB Senate Bill
SDWA Safe Drinking Water Act
State Water Board State Water Resources Control Board
City of Brea Cross Connec�on Control Management Plan (CCCMP) DRAFT City of Brea CCCMP – March 2025
1-4
SVB Spill-resistant Pressure Vacuum Breaker backsiphonage prevention assembly
U.S. United States

1.6 Defini�ons and General Requirements
The following definitions apply to the terms used in the CCCPH:
“Air-gap separation” or “AG” means a physical vertical separation of at least two (2) times the effective pipe diameter between the free-flowing discharge end of a potable water supply pipeline and the flood level of an open or non-pressurized receiving vessel, and in no case less than one (1) inch.
“Approved water supply” means a water source that has been approved by the State Water Board for domestic use in a public water system and designated as such in a domestic water supply permit issued pursuant to section 116525 of the CHSC. “Auxiliary water supply” means a source of water, other than an approved water supply, which is either used or equipped, or can be equipped, to be used as a water supply and is located on the premises of, or available to, a water user. “Backflow” means an undesired or unintended reversal of flow of water and/or other liquids, gases, or other substances into a public water system’s distribution system or approved water supply.
“Backflow prevention assembly” or “BPA” means a mechanical assembly designed and constructed to prevent backflow, such that while in-line it can be maintained and its ability to prevent backflow, as designed, can be field tested, inspected, and evaluated. “Backflow prevention assembly tester” means a person who is certified as a backflow prevention assembly tester.
“Community water system” means a public water system that serves at least 15 service connections used by yearlong residents or regularly serves at least 25 yearlong residents of the area served by the system.
“Contact hour” means not less than 50 minutes of a continuing education course. “Continuing education course” means a presentation or training that transmits information related to cross-connection control programs and backflow prevention and protection.
“Cross-connection” means any actual or potential connection or structural arrangement between a public water system, including a piping system connected to the public water system and located on the premises of a water user or available to the water user, and any source or distribution system containing liquid, gas, or other City of Brea Cross Connec�on Control Management Plan (CCCMP) DRAFT City of Brea CCCMP – March 2025
1-5
substances not from an approved water supply.
“Cross-connection control specialist” means a person who is certified as a crossconnection control specialist. “Distribution system” has the same meaning as defined in section 63750.50 of CCR, Title 22, Division 4, Chapter 2.
“Double check detector backflow prevention assembly” or “DCDA” means a double check valve backflow prevention assembly that includes a bypass with a water meter and double check backflow prevention assembly, with the bypass’s water meter accurately registering flow rates up to two gallons per minute and visually showing a registration for all rates of flow. This type of assembly may only be used to isolate low hazard cross-connections. See Diagram 1, CCCMP Appendix H. “Double check detector backflow prevention assembly – type II” or “DCDA-II” means a double check valve backflow prevention assembly that includes a bypass around the second check, with the bypass having a single check valve and a water meter accurately registering flow rates up to two gallons per minute and visually showing a registration for all rates of flow. This type of assembly may only be used to isolate low hazard cross-connections. See Diagram 2, CCCMP Appendix H. “Double check valve backflow prevention assembly” or “DC” means an assembly consisting of two independently-acting internally-loaded check valves, with tightly closing shut-off valves located at each end of the assembly (upstream and downstream of the two check valves) and fitted with test cocks that enable accurate field testing of the assembly. This type of assembly may only be used to isolate low hazard crossconnections. See Diagram 3, CCCMP Appendix H. “Existing public water system” or “existing PWS” means a public water system initially permitted on or before July 1, 2024 as a public water system by the State Water Board.
“Hazard Assessment” means an evaluation of a user premises designed to evaluate the types and degrees of hazard at a user’s premises.
“High hazard cross-connection” means a cross-connection that poses a threat to the potability or safety of the public water supply. Materials entering the public water supply through a high hazard cross-connection are contaminants or health hazards.

See CCCMP Appendix E for some examples.
“Low hazard cross-connection” means a cross-connection that has been found to not pose a threat to the potability or safety of the public water supply but may adversely affect the aesthetic quality of the potable water supply. Materials entering the public water supply through a low hazard cross-connection are pollutants or non-health City of Brea Cross Connec�on Control Management Plan (CCCMP) DRAFT City of Brea CCCMP – March 2025
1-6
hazards.

City of Brea Cross Connec�on Control Management Plan (CCCMP) DRAFT City of Brea CCCMP – March 2025
1-7
“New public water system” or “new PWS” means a public water system permitted after July 1, 2024 as a public water system by the State Water Board. A new public water system includes a public water system receiving a new permit because of a change in ownership.
“Premises containment” means protection of a public water system’s distribution system from backflow from a user’s premises through the installation of one or more air gaps or BPAs, installed as close as practical to the user’s service connection, in a manner that isolates the water user’s water supply from the public water system’s distribution system.
“Pressure vacuum breaker backsiphonage prevention assembly” or “PVB” means an assembly with an independently-acting internally-loaded check valve and an independently-acting loaded air inlet valve located on the discharge side of the check valve; with test cocks and tightly closing shutoff valves located at each end of the assembly that enable accurate field testing of the assembly. This type of assembly may only be used for protection from backsiphonage and is not to be used to protect from backpressure. See Diagram 4, CCCMP Appendix H.
“Public water system” or “PWS” has the same meaning as defined in section 116275(h) of the CHSC.
“Recycled Water" is a wastewater which as a result of treatment is suitable for uses other than potable use.
“Reduced pressure principle backflow prevention assembly” or “RP” means an assembly with two independently acting internally-loaded check valves, with a hydraulically operating mechanically independent differential-pressure relief valve located between the check valves and below the upstream check valve. The assembly shall have shut-off valves located upstream and downstream of the two check-valves, and test cocks to enable accurate field testing of the assembly. See Diagram 5, CCCMP Appendix H.
“Reduced pressure principle detector backflow prevention assembly” or “RPDA” means a reduced pressure principle backflow prevention assembly that includes a bypass with a water meter and reduced pressure principle backflow prevention assembly, with the bypass’s water meter accurately registering flow rates up to two gallons per minute and visually showing a registration for all rates of flow. See Diagram 6, CCCMP Appendix H.
“Reduced pressure principle detector backflow prevention assembly – type II” or “RPDA-II” means a reduced pressure principle backflow prevention assembly that includes a bypass around the second check, with the bypass having a single check valve and a water meter accurately registering flow rates up to two gallons per minute and visually showing a registration for all rates of flow. See Diagram 7, CCCMP City of Brea Cross Connec�on Control Management Plan (CCCMP) DRAFT City of Brea CCCMP – March 2025
1-8
Appendix H.
“Spill-resistant pressure vacuum breaker backsiphonage prevention assembly” or “SVB” means an assembly with an independently-acting internally-loaded check valve and an independently-acting loaded air inlet valve located on the discharge side of the check valve; with shutoff valves at each end and a test cock and bleed/vent port, to enable accurate field testing of the assembly. This type of assembly may only be used for protection from backsiphonage and is not to be used to protect from backpressure.

See Diagram 8, CCCMP Appendix H.
“State Water Board,” unless otherwise specified, means the State Water Resources Control Board or the local primacy agency having been delegated the authority to enforce the requirements of the CCCPH by the State Water Resources Control Board. “Swivel-Ell” means a reduced pressure principle backflow prevention assembly combined with a changeover piping configuration (swivel-ell connection) designed and constructed pursuant to this Chapter. See design and construction criteria, as well as Diagrams 9a and 9b, CCCMP Appendix H.
“User premises” means the property under the ownership or control of a water user and is served, or is readily capable of being served, with water via a service connection with a public water system.
“User’s service connection” means either the point where a water user’s piping is connected to a water system or the point in a water system where the approved water supply can be protected from backflow using an air gap or backflow prevention assembly.
“User Supervisor” means a person designated by a water user to oversee a water use site and responsible for the avoidance of cross-connections. “Water supplier” means a person who owns or operates a public water system. “Water user” means a person or entity who is authorized by the PWS to receive water.

City of Brea Cross Connec�on Control Management Plan (CCCMP) DRAFT City of Brea CCCMP – March 2025
2-1
2 Hazard Assessments and Required Protec�on
In accordance with the State CCCPH, Section 3.1.3 (a)(3) – Hazard Assessments, Section

3.1.4 (b)(2), and Section 3.2.1 – The City must survey its service area and conduct hazard assessments per Article 2 of the State CCCPH that identifies actual or potential crossconnection hazards, degree of hazard, and any backflow protection needed.

2.1 Hazard Assessments
a. To evaluate the potential for backflow into the City’s water distribution system the City must conduct an initial hazard assessment of the user premises within its service area.

The hazard assessment must consider:

1. The existence of cross-connections;

2. the type and use of materials handled and present, or likely to be, on the user premises;

3. the degree of piping system complexity and accessibility;

4. access to auxiliary water supplies, pumping systems, or pressure systems;

5. distribution system conditions that increase the likelihood of a backflow event (e.g., hydraulic gradient differences impacted by main breaks and high waterdemand situations, multiple service connections that may result in flow-through conditions, etc.);

6. user premises accessibility;

7. any previous backflow incidents on the user premises; and

8. the requirements and information provided in the State CCCPH, and the City’s CCCMP.
b. Each hazard assessment must identify the degree of hazard to the City’s distribution system as either a high hazard cross-connection, a low hazard cross- connection, or having no hazard. Examples of some high hazard cross-connection activities may be found in CCCMP Appendix E.
c. The hazard assessment must determine whether an existing BPA, if any, provides adequate protection based on the degree of hazard.
d. Hazard assessments completed prior to the adoption of the State CCCPH may be considered as an initial hazard assessment provided that such hazard assessments and associated backflow protection provide protection consistent with the State CCCPH and the City describes their review of these assessments in the City’s CCCMP. e. Subsequent to the initial hazard assessment described in subsection (a), the City must perform a hazard assessment under the following criteria:

1. if a user premises changes account holder, excluding single-family residences; City of Brea Cross Connec�on Control Management Plan (CCCMP) DRAFT City of Brea CCCMP – March 2025
2-2

2. if a user premises is connected to the City’s water distribution system;

3. if evidence exists of changes in the activities or materials on a user’s premises;

4. if backflow from a user’s premises occurs;

5. periodically, as identified in the City’s CCCMP required pursuant to State CCCPH section 3.1.4.;

6. if the State Water Board requests a hazard assessment of a user’s premises; or

7. if the City concludes an existing hazard assessment may no longer accurately represent the degree of hazard.
f. A cross-connection control specialist must review or conduct each initial and follow-up hazard assessment pursuant to this section and make a written finding that, in the specialist’s judgment based on cross-connection control principles, the City’s hazard assessment properly identified all hazards at the time of the assessment, the appropriate degree of hazards, and the corresponding backflow protection.

2.2 Hazard Assessment Process
In order to assess each connection in the City’s water distribution system for potential cross connection the City will undertake assessments in the following phases. As part of the hazard assessment process the City has created a tracking system for the assessments made under the CCCMP. See CCCMP Appendix F. Data will be gathered and logged into the assessment database in four phases. The assessment database will be included in the City’s Records Retention Policy, see CCCMP Appendix I.
• Phase 1 - All commercial/industrial connections with existing backflow prevention assemblies at the meter connection
• Phase 2 - All commercial/industrial connections without backflow prevention assemblies at the meter connection
• Phase 3 – Residential connections without AMI or backflow prevention assemblies at the meter connection

2.2.1 Phase 1 - Commercial/Industrial Connec�ons with Backflow Protec�on The City currently has as of April 1, 2025, 476 commercial/industrial sites with backflow protection installed at the meter. For Commercial/Industrial sites with backflow protection the City will enter each address into the assessment tracking system indicating what type of BPA has been installed. The City’s Cross Connection Control Specialist will review the data when entered into the assessment database to verify that an appropriate BPA has been installed on the meter connection. The Cross Connection Control Specialist’s review date will be noted in the assessment database.

The City currently has 476 commercial/industrial connections within the City. It is assumed that the City’s Cross Connection Control Specialist can process (5) self-reporting letters returned per day, and one day per week for processing hazard responses. Therefore, the Cross Connection Control Specialist can process 260 hazard responses per year. Based on the City of Brea Cross Connec�on Control Management Plan (CCCMP) DRAFT City of Brea CCCMP – March 2025
2-3
current number of commercial/industrial accounts of 476, this will take approximately 2 years to complete.

2.2.2 Phase 2 - Commercial/Industrial Connec�ons without Backflow Protec�on The City currently has as of April 1, 2025, 118 commercial/industrial sites without backflow protection installed at the meter. For those commercial/industrial connections without an approved BPA the City will provide a self-reporting letter to provide information regarding onsite conditions which would necessitate the installation of an approved BPA at the meter connection. The self-reporting letters will be distributed via direct mail.

It is assumed that the City’s Cross Connection Control Specialist can process (5) self-reporting letters returned per day, and one day per week for processing hazard responses. Therefore, the Cross Connection Control Specialist can process 260 hazard responses per year. Based on the current number of commercial/industrial accounts of 118, this will take less than one year to complete.
• If the Cross Connection Control Specialist determines that based on the self-reporting letter that an approved BPA is not required, they will note that in the assessment database and the reason for not requiring an approved BPA. • If the Cross Connection Control Specialist determines that based on the self-reporting letter that an approved BPA is required, they will note that in the assessment database and notify the commercial/industrial customer that an approved BPA must be installed at the meter connection and note that determination in the assessment database.

The City has determined that this phase of the assessments can be completed within two years from the adoption of the City’s CCCMP.

2.2.3 Phase 3 – Residen�al Connec�ons without Backflow Protec�on The City currently has as of April 1, 2025, 11,303 residential sites without backflow protection installed at the meter. For those residential connections the City will assess each site by means of office-based tools such as:
• Reviewing sites via Google Maps or other aerial photography software • Reviewing tract maps to review blocks of residential customer in a common building area or zone.
• Using meter route maps or other billing information databases.

The office-based assessment will review sites for:
• Private water wells
• Other auxiliary water supplies
City of Brea Cross Connec�on Control Management Plan (CCCMP) DRAFT City of Brea CCCMP – March 2025
2-4
• Sewer lift stations
• Graywater systems
The office-based assessments would be conducted based on the available Cross Connection Control Specialist hours to review the office-based databases and/or files. • If the Cross Connection Control Specialist determines that based on the office-based assessment that an approved BPA is not required, they will note that in the assessment database.
• If the Cross Connection Control Specialist determines that based on the office-based that an approved BPA is required, they will note that in the assessment database and notify the residential customer that an approved BPA must be installed at the meter connection and note that the customer has been contacted in the assessment database.

It is assumed that a Cross Connection Control Specialist can perform assessments by means of office-based tools. Assuming that the total number of annual Cross Connection Control Specialist available hours is 104 hrs./yr, and the Cross Connection Control Specialist can review twenty-five (25) sites per hour, therefore 2,600 residential sites can be assessed per year. Based on the 11,303 residential connections as of April 1, 2025 the City has determined that this phase of the assessments can be completed within 4.34 years from the completion of Phase 3.

City of Brea Cross Connec�on Control Management Plan (CCCMP) DRAFT City of Brea CCCMP – March 2025
3-1
3 Opera�ng Rules or Ordinances
In accordance with the State CCCPH, Section 3.1.3 (a)(1), and Section 3.1.4(b)(1) and Section

3.1.4 (b)(3),the City must have operating rules, ordinances, by-laws, or a resolution to implement the cross-connection program. The City must have legal authority to implement corrective actions in the event a water user fails to comply in a timely manner with the City’s provisions regarding the installation, inspection, field testing, or maintenance of BPAs required pursuant to this Section. Such corrective actions must include the City’s ability to perform at least one of the following:
• Deny or discontinue water service to a water user,
• Install, inspect, field test, and/or maintain a BPA at a water user’s premises, or • Otherwise address in a timely manner a failure to comply with the City’s crossconnection control program.

The City’s backflow and cross-connection prevention requirements are contained in the City’s Municipal Code, Sections XXXXXXXXXXX thru XXXXXXXXX. A copy is attached as CCCMP Appendix C.

The City’s backflow and cross-connection prevention requirements are contained in the City’s Ordinance No. XXXXX, Sections XXXXXXXXXXX thru XXXXXXXXX. A copy is attached as CCCMP Appendix D.

City of Brea Cross Connec�on Control Management Plan (CCCMP) DRAFT City of Brea CCCMP – March 2025
4-1
4 Backflow Preven�on
In accordance with the State CCCPH, Section 3.1.3 (a)(4) and Section 3.2.2 – the City must ensure that actual and potential cross-connections are eliminated when possible or controlled by the installation of approved BPAs or AG’s consistent with the requirements of the Article 3 of the State CCCPH and the sections to follow. The City has 1,400 backflow assemblies installed at the water connections, and 870 onsite backflow assembles which are in the City’s tracking database and included in their annual backflow testing reports.

4.1 Backflow Preven�on Requirements
(a) The City must ensure its distribution system is protected from backflow from identified hazards through the proper installation, continued operation, and field testing of an approved BPA (see Section 4.2.1 for installation and approved BPA criteria). When a DC is required or referenced in the State CCCPH, a DCDA or DCDA-II type of assembly may be substituted if appropriate. When an RP is required or referenced in the State CCCPH, an RPDA or RPDA-II type of assembly may be substituted if appropriate. (b) The BPA installed must be no less protective than that which is commensurate with the degree of hazard at a user premises, as specified in this section and as determined based on the results of the hazard assessment conducted pursuant to CCCMP Section

3. (c) Unless specified otherwise in this section, a City must, at all times, protect its distribution system from high hazard cross-connections (see CCCMP Appendix E for examples), through premises containment, through the use of AG(s) or RP(s). (1) Following State Water Board review and approval, the City may implement an alternate method of premises containment in lieu of a required AG provided that the proposed alternative would provide at least the same level of protection to public health.
(2) Following State Water Board review and approval, the City may accept internal protection in lieu of containment when premises containment is not feasible. (d) Except as otherwise allowed or prohibited in statute or in CCR Title 22, Division 4, Chapter 3, a swivel-ell may be used instead of an AG for premises containment protection when temporarily substituting tertiary recycled water use areas with potable water from a PWS if all the following criteria are met:
(1) the swivel-ell is approved by the State Water Board; (2) the City has a cross-connection control program, required pursuant to the State CCCPH Section 3.1.3, and the use and operation of the swivel-ell is described in the CCCMP required pursuant to the State CCCPH Section 3.1.4; City of Brea Cross Connec�on Control Management Plan (CCCMP) DRAFT City of Brea CCCMP – March 2025
4-2
(3) the design and construction-related requirements of the swivel-ell adheres to the criteria in CCCMP Appendix H;
(4) at least every 12 months, inspections are performed and documented to confirm ongoing compliance with the design and construction-related requirements in CCCMP Appendix H;
(5) the RP used in conjunction with the swivel-ell is field tested and found to be functioning properly:
(A) immediately upon each switchover to potable water use, a visual inspection of the RP must be completed
(B) within 72 hours of each switchover to potable water use, a field test must be completed, and
(C)at least every 12 weeks the use site is supplied with potable water; and (6) there is a legally binding agreement between the City and the entity supplying the recycled water, signed by those with relevant legal authority, which includes the following requirements:
(A) The State Water Board will be notified within 24 hours of all switchovers to or from potable water, will be given an estimate of the timeframe until the next switchover, and will be provided the results of the field testing required in paragraph (5);
(B) a trained representative of the City be present to supervise each switchover; and
(C) within seven days of each switchover, if requested by the State Water Board, the City will submit a written report describing compliance with this subsection, as well as potable and recycled water usage information. (e) Except as noted below, the City must ensure its distribution system is protected with no less than DC protection for a user premises with a fire protection system within ten years of adoption of the State CCCPH.
(1) A high hazard cross-connection fire protection system, including but not limited to fire protection systems that may utilize chemical addition (e.g., wetting agents, foam, anti-freeze, corrosion inhibitor, etc.) or an auxiliary water supply, must have no less than RP protection.
(2) For existing fire protection systems that do not meet the State CCCPH, Section

3.2.2 (e)(3) or cannot install DC protection within ten years of adoption of the State CCCPH, the City may propose in the CCCMP submitted for compliance with the State CCCPH Section 3.1.4:
(A) an alternative date; or
(B) an alternative method of backflow protection that provides at least the same level of protection to public health.

City of Brea Cross Connec�on Control Management Plan (CCCMP) DRAFT City of Brea CCCMP – March 2025
4-3
(3) A BPA is not necessary for a low hazard fire protection system on a residential user premises if the following criteria are satisfied:
(A) the user premises has only one service connection to the City; (B) a single service line onto the user premises exists that subsequently splits on the property for domestic flow and fire protection system flow, such that the fire protection system may be isolated from the rest of the user premises;
(C)a single, water industry standard, water meter is provided to measure combined domestic flow and fire protection system flow; (D)the fire protection system is constructed of piping materials certified as meeting NSF/ANSI Standard 61; or
(E) the fire protection system’s piping is looped within the structure and is connected to one or more routinely used fixtures (such as a water closet) to prevent stagnant water.
(f) The State Water Board and the City may, at their discretion, require a water user to designate a user supervisor when the user premises has a multi-piping system that conveys various types of fluids and where changes in the piping system are frequently made. If a user supervisor is designated the following is required:
(1) The user supervisor is responsible for the avoidance of cross-connections during the installation, operation and maintenance of the water user’s pipelines and equipment. The user supervisor must be trained on the fluids used and backflow protection for the premise, and must inform the City of changes in piping, and maintain current contact information on file with the City; and; (2) The City must include in the CCCMP required in the State CCCPH Section 3.1.4 the training and qualification requirements for user supervisors, identify the entity that will provide the user supervisor training, and frequency of any necessary recurring training. The training must adequately address the types of hazards and concerns typically found.
(g) Facilities producing, treating, storing, or distributing drinking water that are an approved water supply or water recycling plants as defined by CCR Title 22, Section 60301.710 must have proper internal protection from cross-connections to ensure that all drinking water produced and delivered to customers and workers at those facilities is free from unprotected cross-connections.

4.2 Backflow Preven�on Assemblies

4.2.1 Standards for Types of Backflow Protec�on
(a) Each AG used for the CCCMP must meet the requirements in Table 1, Minimum Air Gaps for Generally used Plumbing Fixtures, page 4 of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) A112.1.2- 2012(R2017).
(b) Each replaced or newly installed PVB, SVB, DC, and RP for protection of the PWS must City of Brea Cross Connec�on Control Management Plan (CCCMP) DRAFT City of Brea CCCMP – March 2025
4-4
be approved through both laboratory and field evaluation tests performed in accordance with at least one of the following:
(1) Standards found in Chapter 10 of the Manual of Cross-Connection Control, Tenth Edition, published by the University of Southern California Foundation for CrossConnection Control and Hydraulic Research; (2) certification requirements for BPAs in the Standards of ASSE International current as of 2022 that include ASSE 1015-2021 for the DC, ASSE 1048-2021 for the DCDA & DCDA-11, ASSE 1013-2021 for the RP, and ASSE 1047-2021 (3) for the RPDA & RPDA-II and must have the 1YT mark.
(c) BPAs must not be modified following approval granted under Section 4.2.1(b). The City requires that BPA testers notify the City if a water user or City-owned BPA has been modified from the CCCMP Section 4.2.1(b) approval.

4.2.2 Installa�on Criteria for Backflow Protection
(a) For AGs, the following is required:
(1) The receiving water container must be located on the water user’s premises at the water user’s service connection unless an alternate location has been approved by the City;
(2) all piping between the water user’s service connection and the discharge location of the receiving water container must be above finished grade and be accessible for visual inspection unless an alternative piping configuration is approved by the City;
(3) the City must ensure that the AG specified in the State CCCPH Section 3.3.1 (a) has been installed; and
(4) any new air gap installation at a user’s service connection must be reviewed and approved by the State Water Board prior to installation. (b) RPs must be installed such that the lowest point of an assembly is a minimum of twelve inches above grade, and a maximum of thirty-six inches above the finished grade, unless an alternative is approved by the PWS.
(c) DCs installed or replaced after the adoption of the State CCCPH must be installed according to the State CCCPH Section 3.3.2 (b). Below ground installation can be considered if approved by the City where it determines no alternative options are available.
(d) A PVB or SVB must be installed at a minimum of twelve inches above all downstream piping and outlets.
(e) SVBs may not be used for premises containment. PVBs may only be used for roadway right of way irrigation systems as premises containment where there is no potential for City of Brea Cross Connec�on Control Management Plan (CCCMP) DRAFT City of Brea CCCMP – March 2025
4-5
backpressure.
(f) A RP or DC installed after the adoption of the State CCCPH must have a minimum side clearance of twelve inches, except that a minimum side clearance of twenty-four inches must be provided on the side of the assembly that contains the test cocks. The City may approve alternate clearances providing that there is adequate clearance for field testing and maintenance.
(g) Backflow protection must be located as close as practical to the water user’s service connection unless one or more alternative locations have been approved by the City. If internal protection is provided in lieu of premises containment, the City must obtain access to the user premises and must ensure that the on-site protection meets the requirements of this Chapter for installation, field testing, and inspections. (h) Each BPA and air gap separation must be accessible for field testing, inspection, and maintenance.

They City’s Standard Specification and/or drawings for each type of BPA is contained in Appendix L.

City of Brea Cross Connec�on Control Management Plan (CCCMP) DRAFT City of Brea CCCMP – March 2025
5-1
5 Non-Testable Devices

5.1 Non-testable backflow preventer tes�ng procedures
There are non-testable backflow preventer devices under City ownership or administration.

Hose-bibb vacuum breakers is an example of the most common types of non-testable backflow prevention devices for the City.

Table 5-1 Location of Non-Testable Backflow Prevention Devices Location of Non-Testable Backflow Preventer
Location Air Gap
Atmospheric
Vacuum
Breaker
Hose-bibb
Vacuum
Breaker
Dual Check
Valve Identification Potential Onsite Hazard
City of Brea
Yard/ Berry St
Reservoir
No No Yes No No
Westside
Reservoir No No Yes No No
Eastside
Reservoir No No Yes No No
Tonner
Reservoir No No Yes No No
Valencia
Reservoir No No Yes No No
Carbon Canyon
Reservoirs No No Yes No No
All the sites are checked daily Monday thru Friday.

City of Brea Cross Connec�on Control Management Plan (CCCMP) DRAFT City of Brea CCCMP – March 2025
6-1
6 Cer�fied Backflow Preven�on Assembly Testers and
Cer�fied Cross-Connec�on Control Specialists
In accordance with the State CCCPH, Section 3.1.3 (a)(5), Section 3.1.4 (b)(6), and Section

3.4.1 – the City must ensure that each BPA required by the CCCMP to protect the City’s domestic water system is field tested by a person with valid certification from a certifying organization recognized by the State Water Board pursuant to the State’s CCCPH.

6.1 Backflow Tester Cer�fica�on
All backflow testers testing within the service area of the City must provide evidence of current certification from a State Water Board-recognized organization certifying backflow prevention assembly testers. Certifying organizations must be recognized by the State Water Board in accordance with requirements of the State CCCPH and ISO/IEC 17024. Beginning on July 1, 2025, only those testers with a valid certification from a State Water Board recognized certifying organization shall be allowed to test BPA’s in the City’s service area, certifications from any other entity will be considered invalid.

6.1.1 Backflow Tester List
Backflow Testers must provide evidence of certification from a State Water Board recognized certifying organization and be uploaded into the electronic database and hold a current City business license in order to perform backflow testing in the City. • A copy of the list of approved testers can be at https://ca-nv-awwa.org/ • City requires that all Backflow Testers provide current calibration information for all test equipment to be used for testing within the City service area.

The City has no staff who are certified by a State Water Board recognized certifying organization as Backflow Testers.

City of Brea Cross Connec�on Control Management Plan (CCCMP) DRAFT City of Brea CCCMP – March 2025
6-2

6.2 Cross-Connec�on Control Specialist Certification
All Cross-Connection Control Specialists, used by the City pursuant to the requirements of the State CCCPH, shall have valid certification from a State Water Board recognized certifying organization, which complies with the State CCCPH, will be considered to be a State Water Board recognized certifying organization.

Beginning three years after the effective date of the State CCCPH, only those CrossConnection Control Specialists with a valid certification from a State Water Board recognized certifying organization shall satisfy the requirements of the State CCCPH. Certifications obtained by organizations that do not meet the requirements of the State CCCPH will be invalid.

The City has no staff who are certified by a State Water Board recognized certifying organization as Cross Connection Control Specialists. The City has contracted with a Cross Connection Control Specialist certified by a State Water Board recognized certifying organization. That contracted Cross Connection Control Specialist is:

Thomas R. Holliman, PE
T.R. Holliman and Associates, Inc.
3543 Citrus Street
Highland, CA 92346
(909) 573-6802
[email protected]
AWWA Cross Connection Control Program Specialist
No. 02726
Certification expiration: April 30, 2026
City of Brea Cross Connec�on Control Management Plan (CCCMP) DRAFT City of Brea CCCMP – March 2025
7-1
7 Backflow Incident Response, Repor�ng and No�fica�on
In accordance with the State CCCPH, Section 3.1.3(a)(8), Section 3.1.4 (b)(7), and Section

3.5.2 the City has developed and implemented procedures for investigating and responding to suspected or actual backflow incidents. The procedure for responding to backflow incidents, reporting any incidents, and reporting those incidents, will be:

7.1 Backflow Incident Response Procedure
In the event that a suspected backflow incident occurs in the City, the City’s response will include, but not limited to, the following:
(a) Consideration of complaints or reports of changes in water quality as possible incidents of backflow;
(b) Water quality sampling and pressure recording; and
(c) Documentation of the investigation, and any response and follow-up activities.

7.2 Backflow Incident No�fica�on
In the event that a backflow incident occurs the Cross-Connection Control Coordinator will provide the following notification:
(a) The Cross-Connection Control Coordinator will notify the State Water Board and Orange County Health Care Agency of any known or suspected incident of backflow within 24 hours of the determination. If required by the State Water Board, the City will issue a Tier 1 public notification pursuant to CCR, Title 22, Section 64463.1. (b) If required by the State Water Board, the City will submit, by a date specified by the State Water Board, a written incident report describing the details and affected area of the backflow incident, the actions taken by the City in response to the backflow incident, and the follow up actions to prevent future backflow incidents. The written report form is in CCCMP Appendix J.

City of Brea Cross Connec�on Control Management Plan (CCCMP) DRAFT City of Brea CCCMP – March 2025
8-1
8 Cross-Connec�on Control Program Coordinator
In accordance with the State CCCPH, Section 3.1.3 (a)(2) and Section 3.1.4 (b)(8), the City must designate at least one individual involved in the development of and be responsible for the reporting, tracking, and other administration duties of its cross-connection control program.

Further for public water systems with more than 3,000 service connections the CrossConnection Control Program Coordinator must be a Cross-Connection Control Specialist.

The City’s water system includes as of April 1, 2025, 13,394 domestic water connections.

Therefore, the City must have a Cross-Connection Control Program Coordinator. The Coordinator does not have to be a certified Cross-Connection Control Specialist.

The City’s Cross-Connection Control Program Coordinator is:

Rudy Correa
Superintendent
Public Works Department
City of Brea
1 Civic Center Circle
Brea, CA 92821
(714) 990-7697
[email protected]
The City’s Cross-Connection Control Program Specialist is:

Thomas R. Holliman, PE
T.R. Holliman and Associates, Inc.
3543 Citrus Street
Highland, CA 92346
(909) 573-6802
[email protected]
AWWA Cross Connection Control Program Specialist
No. 02726
Certification expiration: April 30, 2026
The City’s CCCMP was developed in consultation with their Cross-Connection Control Specialist(s) because the City’s domestic water system has more than 1,000 service connections.

The City’s designated Cross-Connection Control Specialist can be contacted within one hour, per the requirement of the State CCCPH for a PWS with 3,000 or more service connections.

City of Brea Cross Connec�on Control Management Plan (CCCMP) DRAFT City of Brea CCCMP – March 2025
8-2

8.1 Cross Connec�on Control Specialist Designee
In the event the City’s Cross Connection Control Specialist is not available due to vacation, sickness, or other reason, the duties of the Cross Connection Control Specialist will be carried out by:

Erasmo Jacinto
Environmental Health Specialist III
Orange County Health Care Agency
(714) 640-9593
[email protected]
City of Brea Cross Connec�on Control Management Plan (CCCMP) DRAFT City of Brea CCCMP – March 2025
9-1
9 Recordkeeping
In accordance with the State CCCPH, Section 3.1.3(a)(7) and Section 3.1.4 (b)(9) the City has developed and implemented a recordkeeping system for:

1. Backflow prevention assemblies (BPA)

2. Cross-connection information.

3. Commercial/Industrial and Residential site assessments.

This recordkeeping system complies with the State CCCPH section 3.5.1, and the City’s Written Records Retention Policy included in CCCMP Appendix I.

9.1 Records Retained
The City maintains the following records via a Microsoft Access Database:
(a) The hazard assessments for each user premise, conducted pursuant to CCCPH section

3.2.1 (Hazard Assessment).
(b) For each BPA, the associated hazard or application, location, owner, type, manufacturer and model, size, installation date, and serial number.
(c) For each AG installation, the associated hazard or application and the location, owner, and as-built plans of the AG.
(d) Results of all BPA field testing, AG inspections, swivel-ell inspections, and field tests for the previous three calendar years, including the name, test date, repair date, and certification number of the backflow prevention assembly tester for each BPA field test and AG and swivel-ell.
(e) Repairs made to, or replacement or relocation of, BPAs for the previous three calendar years.
(f) The most current cross-connection tests (e.g., shutdown test, dye test), if recycled water use on the premise.
(g) If a User Supervisor is designated for a user premise, the current contact information for the User Supervisor and Water User, and any applicable training and qualifications as described by State CCCPH section 3.2.2(f).
(h) Descriptions and follow-up actions related to all backflow incidents. (i) If any portion of the cross-connection control program is carried out under contract or City of Brea Cross Connec�on Control Management Plan (CCCMP) DRAFT City of Brea CCCMP – March 2025
9-2
agreement, a copy of the current contract or agreement. (j) The current Cross-Connection Control Management Plan as required in the State CCCPH Section 3.1.4.
(k) Any public outreach or education materials issued as required in the State CCCPH section 3.1.3.(a)(7) for the previous three calendar years. (l) All records retained by the City will be made available to the State Water Board upon request.
(m) Records of Commercial/Industrial site assessments.
(n) Records of Residential site assessments.

9.2 Recordkeeping Policy and Procedures
The City has a written Records Retention Policy which is contained in CCCMP Appendix I.

The procedures are generally described below:

9.2.1 Residen�al Site Assessments
Residential assessments conducted in accordance with Section 3 generate a:

Electronic assessment document submitted as a pdf which is reviewed by the Cross Connection Control Specialist and signed in Adobe, data is stored electronically by the Administrative Clerk.

Electronic assessment document which has been reviewed and signed by the Cross Connection Control Specialist in Adobe)
• If no action is required:
o Method: Electronic copies are filed on the PubWrks Server (S: Drive) o Location: PubWrks Server File (S:\MAINTENANCE\BACKFLOW\Residential Site Assessments
o Responsible person(s):

Annette Puerto
Administrative Clerk II
545 N Berry Street,
Brea CA 92821
[email protected]
(714) 990-7691
o Filing Method: By Grid number.
o Disposal after holding period: Records are not disposed of because they are City of Brea Cross Connec�on Control Management Plan (CCCMP) DRAFT City of Brea CCCMP – March 2025
9-3
stored electronically
o Responsible person(s) for disposal: Not applicable, all records are retained indefinitely.
o Assessments data storage method: By Customer address and Meter ID # • If action is required
o Notification generated by Cross Connection Control Specialist that a backflow is required.
o Notification mailed to residential customer.
o Specialist follows up in 10 days to verify that backflow has been installed. o Action noted in residential assessment database.

9.2.2 Industrial/Commercial site assessments
Connections without meter protection – self assessment letters Hard copy assessment document which has been reviewed and signed by the Cross Connection Control Specialist per Section 3).
• If no action required – to be filed only
o Filing Methody: – filed by years. Years 2022, 2023, 2024 will be stored at Maintenance Yard, 545 N Berry St, Brea CA 92821
o Location of file: Stored in file cabinets located on the 1st floor in the Administrative Area
o Responsible person(s):

Annette Puerto
Administrative Clerk II
545 N Berry Street
Brea CA 92821
[email protected]
(714) 990-7691
o Length of records retention: 3 Years
o Records disposal method after holding period: Recycled and disposed of per City Clerks process
o Responsible person(s) for disposal:

Annette Puerto
Administrative Clerk II
545 N Berry Street
Brea CA 92821
[email protected]
(714) 990-7691
o Assessments data storage method: By Customer address and Meter ID # o Electronic storage location: Not currently. Starting in 2025.

City of Brea Cross Connec�on Control Management Plan (CCCMP) DRAFT City of Brea CCCMP – March 2025
10-4
• If action is required
o Notification generated by Cross Connection Control Specialist that a backflow is required.
o Notification mailed to residential customer.
o Specialist follows up in 10 days to verify that backflow has been installed. o Action noted in residential assessment database.

Electronic filing process - Starting in 2025
Electronic assessment document submitted as a pdf which is reviewed by the Cross Connection Control Specialist and signed in Adobe. Data is stored electronically). Electronic assessment document which has been reviewed and signed by the Cross Connection Control Specialist in Adobe).
• If no action is required -
o Electronic copy filing location: PubWrks Server (S: Drive) located XXXXXX. o Storage method: File stored on the PubWrks Server
(S:\MAINTENANCE\BACKFLOW\Industrial_Commercial site assessments o Responsible person(s) for disposal: Annette Puerto
Administrative Clerk II
545 N Berry Street
Brea CA 92821
[email protected]
(714) 990-7691
o Storage filing system method: Grid number.
o Disposal method after retention period: Not disposed since stored electronically.
o Responsible person(s) for disposal of the expired documents: NA o Storage method: By customer address & meter number]
o Electronic storage location got assessments: PubWrks Server (S:\MAINTENANCE\BACKFLOW\Industrial_Commercial site assessments • If action is required
o Notification generated by Cross Connection Control Specialist that a backflow is required.
o Notification mailed to residential customer.
o Specialist follows up in 10 days to verify that backflow has been installed. o Action noted in residential assessment database.
10 User Supervisors
In accordance with the State CCCPH, Section 3.2.2 (3)(f),The State Water Board and City may, at their discretion, require a water user to designate a user supervisor when the user premises has a multi-piping system that conveys various types of fluids and where changes in the piping system are frequently made. If a user supervisor is designated the following is City of Brea Cross Connec�on Control Management Plan (CCCMP) DRAFT City of Brea CCCMP – March 2025
10-5
required:
(1) The user supervisor is responsible for the avoidance of cross-connections during the installation, operation and maintenance of the water user’s pipelines and equipment. The user supervisor must be trained on the fluids used and backflow protection for the premise, and must inform the City of changes in piping, and maintain current contact information on file with the City; and,
(2) The City must include in the CCCMP required in CCCPH Section 3.1.4 the training and qualification requirements for user supervisors if required by the State Water Board or City, identify the entity that will provide the user supervisor training, and frequency of any necessary recurring training. The training must adequately address the types of hazards and concerns typically found.

The City has not required any user supervisors for use sites within the City.

City of Brea Cross Connec�on Control Management Plan (CCCMP) DRAFT City of Brea CCCMP – March 2025
11-1
11 Backflow Preven�on Assembly Tes�ng and Repor�ng
In accordance with the State CCCPH, Section 3.1.3 (a)(6) – the City must ensure that each BPA required by the CCCMP to protect the City’s domestic water system is field tested. The City must develop and implement a procedure for ensuring all BPAs are field tested, inspected, and maintained and AG’s are inspected and maintained in accordance with the State CCCPH, Section 3.3.3.

1. All BPAs installed in the City in compliance with it CCCMP must be field tested following installation, repair, depressurization for winterizing, or permanent relocation. All required field testing must be performed by certified backflow prevention assembly tester.

2. BPAs must be field tested at least annually. The State CCCPH does not preclude the City, the State Water Board, or a local health agency from requiring more frequent field testing for premises with high hazard cross-connection or BPA at increased risk of testing failure.

3. Air-gap separations must be visually inspected at least annually by a certified as backflow prevention assembly tester or certified as a cross-connection control specialist.

4. The City must receive passing field tests before providing continuous service to a water user with a newly installed BPA.

5. BPAs that fail the field test must be repaired or replaced within 30 days of notification of the failure by the City. Extensions will not be allowed by the City.

Backflow prevention assembly testers must notify the City within one day if a backflow incident or an unprotected cross-connection is observed at the BPA or prior to the user premises during field testing. The City will immediately investigate and discontinue service to the user premises if a backflow incident is confirmed, and water service will not be restored to that user premises until the City receives a confirmation of a passing BPA field test from a backflow prevention assembly tester and the assembly is protecting the City.

11.1 Backflow Tes�ng No�fica�on Process
For each BPA in the City’s water distribution system, an annual notice that the BPA must be tested in accordance with the CCCMP will be (how distributed?) Upon receipt, the Owner will have (how long?) to have the BPA tested by a certified backflow assembly tester, and the test results submitted to the City (how?) City of Brea Cross Connec�on Control Management Plan (CCCMP) DRAFT City of Brea CCCMP – March 2025
11-2
Each water user with a BPA on the service connection must comply with the following schedule in order to be in compliance with the CCCMP and continue to receive water service from the City.
• First notice – the first annual notice of BPA testing required is sent to the users by mail in one group per month for twelve months. The customers has 45 days from the date of the notice to respond and submit backflow test results by email. • Second notice – if after 45 days after the first notice was sent to the user test results are not submitted, a second notice will be sent to the customer by email. The customer has 30 days from the date of the second notice to provide the required backflow test results by email.
• Third notice– if after 30 days after the second notice was sent to the user, a third notice will be sent to the user by /email notifying the customer that the water will be shutoff if the backflow test results are not submitted within 15 days of the third notice. or both?) with shutoff notice. How long to respond and how to respond (return mail, email, both?).

In person visit or phone call?
• Fourth notice/Service Termination – at the end of the 15 days third notice a door hanger is installed at the use site notifying the customer that the water will be turned off within 24 hours unless the backflow test results have been submitted to the City by email. install door hangar with one day notice to turnoff.

11.2Damaged, missing, or improperly installed backflow preven�on assemblies.

In the event that a backflow prevention assembly is missing (or stolen), installed incorrectly, illegally modified, or tampered with, the City shall implement the following actions.

In the event that a backflow device has been stolen, incorrectly installed, illegally modified, or tamper with, the City will follow the procedure described below. • Contract property Owner and notify them the backflow prevention assembly has been stolen, incorrectly installed, illegally modified, or tamper with and give the customer 24 hours to correct the problem.
• Turnoff water to the use site at the meter.
• When customer replaces the backflow prevention assembly require test results. • Inspect the installation and if there are no issues to correct, turn the water on to the site.

City of Brea Cross Connec�on Control Management Plan (CCCMP) DRAFT City of Brea CCCMP – March 2025
12-1
12 Public Outreach and Educa�on
In accordance with State CCCPH, Section 3.1.3 (a)(9) and Section 3.1.4 (b)(12) – the City has developed a cross-connection control public outreach and education program that is intended to educate staff, customers, and the community about backflow protection and crossconnection control.

The City has a designated Public Information Officer (PIO) that provides a point of contact for the City regarding the City’s cross-connection control and backflow protection program and other water related issues. The City’s PIO is:

Liz Pharis
Communication & Marketing Manager/PIO
City of Brea
545 N Berry Street,
Brea CA 92821
(714) 990-7673
[email protected]
Public Outreach to educate the City’s customers on backflow and cross-connection control include information on backflow and cross-connections on the City’s website which is www.cityofbrea.gov
In addition, backflow and cross-connection prevention may be distributed by other means, including but not limited to, periodic water bill inserts, information pamphlet distribution, new customer documentation, emails, and additions to the City’s Consumer Confidence Reports (CCR) and copy of the CCR is contained Appendix K.

City of Brea Cross Connec�on Control Management Plan (CCCMP) DRAFT City of Brea CCCMP – March 2025
12-2
City of Brea Cross Connec�on Control Management Plan (CCCMP) DRAFT City of Brea CCCMP – March 2025
13-1
13 Local En�ty Coordina�on
In accordance with the State CCCPH, Section 3.1.3 (a)(10) and Section 3.1.4 (b)(13) The City must coordinate with applicable local entities that are involved in either cross-connection control or public health protection to ensure hazard assessments can be performed, appropriate backflow protection is provided and provide assistance in the investigation of backflow incidents. Local entities may include but are not limited to plumbing, permitting, or health officials, law enforcement, fire departments, maintenance, and public and private entities.

For the City the local entities which are involved in cross-connection control include, but are not limited to:

Local Entity: City of Brea, Police Department
Contact Name: Adam Hawley, Chief of Police
Address: 1 Civic Center Circle, Brea, CA 92821
Phone: (714) 990-7634
Email: [email protected]
Local Entity: City of Brea, Fire Department
Contact Name: Mark Terrill, Fire Chief
Address: 1 Civic Center Circle, Brea, CA 92821
Phone: (714) 337-5446
Email: [email protected]
Local Entity: OCHA, Health Care Agency
Contact Name: Sham Elmishad, Water Quality Supervisor
Address: 405 W. 5th Street, Santa Ana, CA 92701
Phone: (714) 433-6280
Email: [email protected]
Local Entity: City of Brea, Community Development
Contact Name: Noah McGranahan, Code Enforcement Officer Address: 1 Civic Center Circle, Brea, CA 92821
Phone: (714) 990-7764
Email: [email protected]
The City intends to include coordination with other local PWS through events which may include, but not be limited to, semi-annual gatherings with other PWS’ Cross Connection Control Coordinators, public outreach events, and vendor workshops.

City of Brea Cross Connec�on Control Management Plan (CCCMP) DRAFT City of Brea CCCMP – March 2025
13-2
Appendix A
What is a Cross Connection?
City of Brea Cross Connec�on Control Management Plan (CCCMP) DRAFT City of Brea CCCMP – March 2025
13-3
Appendix A
Background on Backflow Protection and Cross-Connection Control A.1 What is a Cross-Connection?
A cross-connection is an interconnection between a potable water supply and a non- potable source via any actual or potential connection or structural arrangement between a PWS and any source or distribution system containing liquid, gas, or other substances not from an approved water supply. Bypass arrangements, jumper connections, removable sections, swivel or change-over devices and other temporary or permanent devices through which, or because of which backflow can occur are considered to be cross-connections.1 The State CCCPH includes acceptable installation criteria for swivel-ell and other types of backflow prevention assemblies (BPAs) to prevent backflow.

Backflow is the undesired or unintended reversal of flow of water and/or other liquids, gases, or other substances into a PWS’s distribution system or approved water supply.

The presence of a cross-connection represents a location in a distribution system through which backflow of contaminants or pollutants can occur. Backflow occurs when a non-potable source is at a greater pressure than the potable water distribution system. Backflow can occur from either backsiphonage or backpressure. Backsiphonage occurs when a non-potable source enters the drinking water supply due to negative (i.e., sub-atmospheric) distribution system pressure. Backpressure occurs when the pressure from a non-potable source exceeds the pressure in the potable water distribution system.

Backsiphonage may be caused by a variety of circumstances, such as main breaks, flushing, pump failure, or emergency firefighting water demand. Backpressure may occur when heating, cooling, waste disposal, or industrial manufacturing systems are connected to potable supplies and the pressure in the external system exceeds the pressure in the distribution system. Both situations act to change the direction of water, which normally flows from the distribution system to the customer, so that non-potable substances from industrial, commercial, or residential premises flows back into the distribution system through a cross-connection.

Cross-connections are not limited to industrial or commercial facilities. Submerged inlets are found on many common plumbing fixtures and are sometimes necessary features of the fixtures if they are to function properly. Examples of this type of design are siphon-jet urinals or water closets, flushing rim slop sinks, and dental cuspidors.

Older bathtubs and lavatories may have supply inlets below the flood level rims, but modern sanitary design has minimized or eliminated this cross-connection in new fixtures. Chemical and industrial process vats sometimes have submerged inlets where the water pressure is used as an aid in diffusion, dispersion, and agitation of the vat contents. Even though a supply pipe may be installed above a vat, backsiphonage can still occur. Siphon action has been shown to raise City of Brea Cross Connec�on Control Management Plan (CCCMP) DRAFT City of Brea CCCMP – March 2025
13-4
a liquid in a pipe such as water almost 34 feet. Some submerged inlets are difficult to control, including those which are not apparent until a significant change in water level occurs or where a supply may be conveniently extended below the liquid surface by means of a hose or auxiliary piping. A submerged inlet may be created in numerous ways, and its detection may be difficult.

Chemical and biological contaminants have caused illness and deaths during known incidents of backflow, with contamination affecting several service connections, and the number of incidents reported is believed to be a small percentage of the total number of backflow incidents that actually occur. The public health risk from cross-connections and backflow is a function of a variety of factors including cross-connection and backflow occurrence and type and amount of contaminants.

A.2 Purpose of a Cross-Connection Control Program
The purpose of a cross-connection control program is to prevent the occurrence of backflow into a PWS’s distribution system in order to protect customers from contamination or pollution from any on-site hazards. Properly installed and maintained BPAs, devices or methods provide protection against the threat posed by many conditions typically found on a user’s premise.

The use of approved BPAs ensures that the appropriate performance evaluation of the assembly was conducted. It is important and required by the State CCCPH to select and properly install an approved BPA that is capable of protecting the distribution system from the hazard identified.

The success of a program depends on individuals that are knowledgeable about crossconnection control to identify actual and potential hazards, apply principles of backflow protection and prevention, and implement cross-connection control policies and procedures. A successful program will have ongoing surveillance of a PWS to ensure BPAs, devices or methods are working and identify new hazards or changes in the distribution system. Certified specialists are needed to properly evaluate the degree of hazard that exists in the distribution system. Hazards typically identified in distribution systems along with the required level of protection are specified in Chapter 3 of the State CCCPH.

A.3 Notes on Applicability of the Cross-Connection Control Policy Handbook The State CCCPH provides the basis for regulating the use and management of crossconnection control programs and BPAs in PWSs, and related requirements for supporting programs and policies. Activities or uses outside of the scope of the authority of the State Water Board to regulate PWSs are not regulated by the State CCCPH, including California Plumbing Code requirements and definitions not related to PWSs.

Recycled water cross-connection control installations and programs for the purposes of protecting the recycled water supply are not regulated by the State CCCPH, although a PWS that uses recycled water is regulated by the State CCCPH to ensure that a PWS’s drinking water system has adequate backflow protection from a recycled water system.

City of Brea Cross Connec�on Control Management Plan (CCCMP) DRAFT City of Brea CCCMP – March 2025
13-5
Water systems that do not meet the definition of a PWS (e.g., “State Small Water Systems” under CCR Title 22, Article 3) are not regulated by the CCCPH, although they may need to comply with the California Plumbing Code, local health agencies, and other laws or entities. __________________________________________
1 California Department of Health Services (DHS), Public Water Supply Branch. (1988). Guidance Manual for cross connection Control Program (Green Manual). California Department of Health Services City of Brea Cross Connec�on Control Management Plan (CCCMP) DRAFT City of Brea CCCMP – March 2025
13-1
Appendix B
Assembly Bill 1671 (2017, Chapter 533)
Assembly Bill 1180 (2019, Chapter 455)
City of Brea Cross Connec�on Control Management Plan (CCCMP) DRAFT City of Brea CCCMP – March 2025
Assembly Bill No. 1671
CHAPTER 533
An act to amend Section 116810 of, and to add Sections 116407 and 116555.5 to, the Health and Safety Code, relating to drinking water. [Approved by Governor October 6, 2017. Filed with Secretary of State October 6, 2017.]
legislative counsel’s digest
AB 1671, Caballero. Backflow protection and cross-connection controls:
standards.
(1) Existing law, the California Safe Drinking Water Act, requires the State Water Resources Control Board to administer provisions relating to the regulation of drinking water to protect public health, including, but not limited to, conducting research, studies, and demonstration projects relating to the provision of a dependable, safe supply of drinking water, enforcing the federal Safe Drinking Water Act, adopting regulations, and conducting studies and investigations to assess the quality of private domestic water wells. Existing law makes certain violations of the act a misdemeanor.

Existing law requires any person who owns a public water system to ensure that the system does certain things, including, but not limited to, that it will not be subject to backflow under normal operating conditions. Existing law, to ensure that testing and maintenance of backflow prevention devices are performed by persons qualified to do testing and maintenance, authorizes local health officers to maintain programs for certification of backflow prevention device testers and requires the certification program to be consistent with backflow protection regulations adopted by the state board. A violation of these provisions, or an order by a local health officer pursuant to these provisions, is a misdemeanor.

This bill would require a public water system to implement a crossconnection control program that complies with, and would require the certification program to be consistent with, applicable regulations and the standards described in (2).
(2) Existing regulations establish standards for a backflow prevention device and cross-connection control.

This bill, on or before January 1, 2020, would require the state board to adopt standards for backflow protection and cross-connection control and would authorize the state board to do so through the adoption of a policy handbook, as specified. By authorizing the state board to adopt standards, the violation of which would be a crime, the bill would create a new crime and impose a state-mandated local program.
94 City of Brea Cross Connec�on Control Management Plan (CCCMP) DRAFT City of Brea CCCMP – March 2025
Ch. 533 — 2 —
(3) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.

This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

The people of the State of California do enact as follows:

SECTION 1. Section 116407 is added to the Health and Safety Code, to read:
116407. (a) On or before January 1, 2020, the state board shall adopt standards for backflow protection and cross-connection control.
(b) The state board may implement subdivision (a) through the adoption of a policy handbook that is not subject to the requirements of Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 11340) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code. The policy handbook shall include standards for backflow protection and cross-connection control. In developing the standards and any amendments to those standards, the state board shall consult with state and local agencies and other persons whom the state board has identified as having expertise in the subject of backflow protection and cross-connection control.

The state board shall hold at least two public hearings before adopting the policy handbook. The policy handbook shall be posted on the board’s Internet Web site. (c) (1) Upon the effective date of a policy handbook adopted by the state board pursuant to subdivision (b), the regulations set forth in Article 1 (commencing with Section 7583) and Article 2 (commencing with Section 7601) of Group 4 of Subchapter 1 of Chapter 5 of Division 1 of Title 17 of the California Code of Regulations shall become inoperative, and, 90 days thereafter, are repealed, unless the state board makes a determination not to repeal a specific regulation. (2) If the state board determines not to repeal a specific regulation pursuant to paragraph (1), the state board shall provide to the Office of Administrative Law and the Secretary of State written notice of its determination, including identification of the specific regulation that is not repealed. That regulation, upon the provision of that written notice to the Office of Administrative Law and the Secretary of State, shall become operative.

SEC. 2. Section 116555.5 is added to the Health and Safety Code, to read:
116555.5. A public water system shall implement a cross-connection control program that complies with applicable regulations and with standards adopted by the board pursuant to Section 116407.

SEC. 3. Section 116810 of the Health and Safety Code is amended to read:
116810. To ensure that testing and maintenance of backflow prevention devices are performed by persons qualified to do testing and maintenance, 94 City of Brea Cross Connec�on Control Management Plan (CCCMP) DRAFT City of Brea CCCMP – March 2025
— 3 — Ch. 533
local health officers may maintain programs for certification of backflow prevention device testers. The local health officer may suspend, revoke, or refuse to renew the certificate of a tester, if, after a hearing before the local health officer or his or her designee, the local health officer or his or her designee finds that the tester has practiced fraud or deception or has displayed gross negligence or misconduct in the performance of his or her duties as a certified backflow prevention device tester. The local health officer may collect fees from certified testers to offset the cost of the certification program provided pursuant to this section. The certification standards shall be consistent with standards adopted by the state board pursuant to Section 116407 and any other applicable backflow protection regulations.

SEC. 4. No reimbursement isrequired by this act pursuant to Section 6 ofArticle XIII B of the California Constitution because the only costs that may be incurred by a local agency or school district will be incurred because this act creates a new crime or infraction, eliminates a crime or infraction, or changes the penalty for a crime or infraction, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code, or changesthe definition of a crime within the meaning of Section 6 of Article XIII B of the California Constitution.
94 City of Brea Cross Connec�on Control Management Plan (CCCMP) DRAFT City of Brea CCCMP – March 2025
Assembly Bill No. 1180
CHAPTER 455
An act to amend Section 116407 of the Health and Safety Code, and to add Section 13521.2 to the Water Code, relating to water.
[Approved by Governor October 2, 2019. Filed with Secretary of State October 2, 2019.]
legislative counsel’s digest
AB 1180, Friedman. Water: recycled water.
(1) Existing law, the California Safe Drinking Water Act, requires the State Water Resources Control Board to administer provisions relating to the regulation of drinking water to protect public health. Existing law requires, on or before January 1, 2020, the state board to adopt standards for backflow protection and cross-connection control through the adoption of a policy handbook, as specified.

This bill would require that handbook to include provisions for the use of a swivel or changeover device to supply potable water to a dual-plumbed system during an interruption in recycled water service.
(2) Existing law requires the state board to establish uniform statewide recycling criteria for each varying type of use of recycled water where the use involves the protection of public health.

This bill would require the state board, on or before January 1, 2023, as specified, to update the uniform statewide criteria for nonpotable recycled water uses.

The people of the State of California do enact as follows:

SECTION 1. The Legislature finds and declares all of the following:
(a) On December 11, 2018, the State Water Resources Control Board unanimously adopted an amendment to the policy for water quality control for recycled water, which included a goal to increase the use of recycled water in the state from 714,000 acre-feet per year in 2015 to 1,500,000 acre-feet per year by 2020 and 2,500,000 acre-feet per year by 2030.
(b) Section 13521 of the Water Code requiresthe state board to establish uniform statewide recycling criteria for each varying type of use of recycled water where the use involves the protection of public health.
(c) The regulations establishing the uniform statewide criteria for recycled water uses are set forth in Chapter 3 (commencing with Section 60301.050) of Division 4 of Title 22 of the California Code of Regulations. The regulations that pertain to nonpotable recycled water uses have not been updated since 2000. 95 City of Brea Cross Connec�on Control Management Plan (CCCMP) DRAFT City of Brea CCCMP – March 2025
Ch. 455 — 2 —
(d) The regulations relating to backflow protection and cross-connection control for recycled water are set forth in Article 1 (commencing with Section 7583) and Article 2 (commencing with Section 7601) of Group 4 of Subchapter 1 of Chapter 5 of Division 1 of Title 17 of the California Code of Regulations. These regulations have not been updated since 1987.
(e) Section 1 of Chapter 533 of the Statutes of 2017 (Assembly Bill 1671 of the 2017–18 Regular Session) requires, on or before January 1, 2020, the state board to adopt backflow protection and cross-connection control standards and authorizes their implementation through a policy handbook.
(f) In order to maximize the amount of recycled water California can safely use for beneficial purposes, it is necessary to update the uniform statewide criteria for nonpotable recycled water uses and specify certain associated backflow protection and cross-connection control provisions.

SEC. 2. Section 116407 of the Health and Safety Code is amended to read:
116407. (a) On or before January 1, 2020, the state board shall adopt standards for backflow protection and cross-connection control.
(b) (1) The state board may implement subdivision (a) through the adoption of a policy handbook that is not subject to the requirements of Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 11340) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code. The policy handbook shall include standards for backflow protection and cross-connection control. In developing the standards and any amendments to those standards, the state board shall consult with state and local agencies and other persons whom the state board has identified as having expertise in the subject of backflow protection and cross-connection control. The state board shall hold at least two public hearings before adopting the policy handbook. The policy handbook shall be posted on the board’s internet website. (2) (A) The policy handbook described in this subdivision shall include provisions for the use of a swivel or changeover device to supply potable water to a dual-plumbed system during an interruption in recycled water service. (B) The use of a swivel or changeover device shall be consistent with any notification and backflow protection provisions contained in the policy handbook. (c) (1) Upon the effective date of a policy handbook adopted by the state board pursuant to subdivision (b), the regulations set forth in Article 1 (commencing with Section 7583) and Article 2 (commencing with Section 7601) of Group 4 of Subchapter 1 of Chapter 5 of Division 1 of Title 17 of the California Code of Regulations shall become inoperative, and, 90 days thereafter, are repealed, unless the state board makes a determination not to repeal a specific regulation. (2) If the state board determines not to repeal a specific regulation pursuant to paragraph (1), the state board shall provide to the Office of Administrative Law and the Secretary of State written notice of its determination, including identification of the specific regulation that is not repealed. That regulation, upon the provision of that written notice to the
95 City of Brea Cross Connec�on Control Management Plan (CCCMP) DRAFT City of Brea CCCMP – March 2025
— 3 — Ch. 455
Office of Administrative Law and the Secretary of State, shall become operative.

SEC. 3. Section 13521.2 is added to the Water Code, to read:
13521.2. (a) On or before January 1, 2023, the state board shall update the uniform statewide criteria for nonpotable recycled water uses established in Chapter 3 (commencing with Section 60301.050) of Division 4 of Title 22 of the California Code of Regulations. The deadline imposed by this section is mandatory only if the Legislature has appropriated sufficient funds, as determined by the executive director of the state board, in the annual Budget Act or otherwise to cover the state board’s costs associated with the performance of the duties imposed by this section. (b) For purposes of the update to the uniform statewide criteria for nonpotable recycled water uses described in subdivision (a), the state board shall adopt a regulation that incorporates by reference the criteria and applicable backflow protection provisions, including the provisionsforthe use of a swivel or changeover device for dual-plumbed systems, that are contained in the most recently adopted version of the policy handbook adopted pursuant to Section 116407 of the Health and Safety Code and any future versions of the policy handbook.

O
95 City of Brea Cross Connec�on Control Management Plan (CCCMP) DRAFT City of Brea CCCMP – March 2025
Appendix C
Municipal Code, Admin Code, or Rules and
Regulations
City of Brea Cross Connec�on Control Management Plan (CCCMP) DRAFT City of Brea CCCMP – March 2025
[insert as applicable]
Municipal Code, Admin Code, or Rules and
Regulations ]
City of Brea Cross Connec�on Control Management Plan (CCCMP) DRAFT City of Brea CCCMP – March 2025
Appendix D
Ordinance No. XXXX
City of Brea Cross Connec�on Control Management Plan (CCCMP) DRAFT City of Brea CCCMP – March 2025
[insert Ordinance if applicable]
City of Brea Cross Connec�on Control Management Plan (CCCMP) DRAFT City of Brea CCCMP – March 2025
Appendix E
High Hazard Premises
City of Brea Cross Connec�on Control Management Plan (CCCMP) DRAFT City of Brea CCCMP – March 2025

APPENDIX E

HIGH HAZARD CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL PREMISES
The list below identifies premises that require backflow protection provided by an air gap or a reduced pressure principle backflow prevention assembly, unless noted otherwise. The list below is not intended to be all-inclusive. A PWS, State Water Board, or local health agency may require an AG, RP, or both to protect a PWS from other hazards not listed below and identified in premises through the hazard assessment completed in CCCPH Chapter 3, section 3.2.1. A PWS may reduce or increase the minimum protection required for a previously hazard-assessed user premise following a hazard reassessment as described in CCCPH Chapter 3, section 3.2.1.

1. Sewage handling facilities

2. Wastewater lift stations and pumping stations

3. Wastewater treatment processes, handling, or pumping equipment that is interconnected to a piping system connected to a PWS (+)

4. Petroleum processing or storage plants

5. Radioactive material storage, processing plants or nuclear reactors

6. Mortuaries

7. Cemeteries

8. Sites with an auxiliary water supply interconnected with PWS (+)

9. Sites with an auxiliary water supply not interconnected with PWS

10.Premises with more than one connection to the PWS (++++)

11.Recycled water (++)(+++)

12.Recycled water interconnected to piping system that contains water received from a PWS (+)

13.Graywater systems, as defined in California Water Code Section 14876, that are interconnected to a piping system that is connected to a PWS

14.Medical facilities

15.Kidney dialysis facilities

16.Dental office with water-connected equipment

17.Veterinarian facilities

18.Chemical plants

19.Laboratories

20.Biotech facilities

21.Electronics manufacture

22.Dry cleaner facilities

23.Industrial or commercial laundry facilities

24.Metal-plating facilities

25.Business park with a single meter serving multiple businesses

26.Marine-port facilities

27.Car wash facilities

28.Mobile home park, RV park, or campgrounds with RV hookups

29.Hotels/motels
City of Brea Cross Connec�on Control Management Plan (CCCMP) DRAFT City of Brea CCCMP – March 2025

30.Gas stations

31.Fire stations

32.Solid waste disposal facilities

33.Pet groomers

34.Agricultural premises

35.Hazard assessment access denied or restricted

36.Railroad maintenance facilities

37.Incarceration facilities (e.g., prisons)

38.Temporary connections to fire hydrants for miscellaneous uses, including construction

39.Private water distribution mains

40.Drinking water storage tank overflow connected to a sump or storm drain (+)

41.Airports
(+) Premise isolated by air gap only except as allowed through CCCPH Section 3.2.2(c) (++) Dual-plumbed use areas established per CCR Title 22, Section 60313 through 60316 where recycled water is used for individually owned residential unit. (+++) Residences using recycled water for landscape irrigation as part of an approved dual plumbed use area established pursuant to CCR Title 22, sections 60313 through 60316 shall use, at a minimum, a DC. If the water supplier is also the supplier of the recycled water, then the recycled water supplier may obtain approval of the local public water supplier or the State Water Board, to utilize an alternative backflow protection plan that includes an annual inspection of both the recycled water and potable water systems and an annual crossconnection test of the recycled water and potable water systems pursuant to subsection 60316(a) in lieu of any BPA.
(++++) All connections must receive at least the same level of protection excluding fire protection when connected to the PWS distribution system (e.g., if one connection requires an RP then all connections must have RPs installed).

City of Brea Cross Connec�on Control Management Plan (CCCMP) DRAFT City of Brea CCCMP – March 2025
Appendix F
Assessment Database
City of Brea Cross Connec�on Control Management Plan (CCCMP) DRAFT City of Brea CCCMP – March 2025
City of Brea Cross Connec�on Control Management Plan (CCCMP) DRAFT City of Brea CCCMP – March 2025
Assessment Database
City of Brea Cross Connec�on Control Management Plan (CCCMP) DRAFT City of Brea CCCMP – March 2025
Appendix G
Self-Report Letter
(Commercial/Industrial Assessments)
City of Brea Cross Connec�on Control Management Plan (CCCMP) DRAFT City of Brea CCCMP – March 2025
Self-Report Letter
(Commercial/Industrial Assessments)
City of Brea Cross Connec�on Control Management Plan (CCCMP) DRAFT City of Brea CCCMP – March 2025
Appendix H
Backflow Prevention Assembly Diagrams
City of Brea Cross Connec�on Control Management Plan (CCCMP) DRAFT City of Brea CCCMP – March 2025
Diagram 1
Double check detector backflow prevention assembly
City of Brea Cross Connec�on Control Management Plan (CCCMP) DRAFT City of Brea CCCMP – March 2025
Diagram 2
Double check detector backflow prevention assembly – type II City of Brea Cross Connec�on Control Management Plan (CCCMP) DRAFT City of Brea CCCMP – March 2025
Diagram 3
Double check valve backflow prevention assembly
City of Brea Cross Connec�on Control Management Plan (CCCMP) DRAFT City of Brea CCCMP – March 2025
Diagram 4
Pressure vacuum breaker backsiphonage prevention assembly City of Brea Cross Connec�on Control Management Plan (CCCMP) DRAFT City of Brea CCCMP – March 2025
Diagram 5
Reduced pressure principle backflow prevention assembly City of Brea Cross Connec�on Control Management Plan (CCCMP) DRAFT City of Brea CCCMP – March 2025
Diagram 6
Reduced pressure principle detector backflow prevention assembly City of Brea Cross Connec�on Control Management Plan (CCCMP) DRAFT City of Brea CCCMP – March 2025
Diagram 7
Reduced pressure principle detector backflow prevention assembly – Type II City of Brea Cross Connec�on Control Management Plan (CCCMP) DRAFT City of Brea CCCMP – March 2025
Diagram 8
Spill-resistant pressure vacuum breaker backsiphonage prevention assembly City of Brea Cross Connec�on Control Management Plan (CCCMP) DRAFT City of Brea CCCMP – March 2025
Swivel-Ell Design and Construc�on Criteria
The criteria below, in conjunction with the swivel-ell diagrams that follow (Diagrams A and B), are minimum acceptable design and construction-related requirements for utilizing a swivelell. For restrictions and allowances for utilizing a swivel-ell, see CCCPH section 3.2.2.

A. Prior to operation of a swivel-ell, the PWS will receive approval for the design and construction plans of that swivel-ell from the State Water Board.

B. The drinking water supply must not, under any circumstances, be directly connected to the recycled water supply, nor be designed such that the recycled water use site could be supplied concurrently by a recycled water supply and a drinking water supply.

C. The drinking water supply line and the recycled water supply line must be offset (see Diagram 9b) in a manner that ensures a tee-connection, spool, or other prefabricated mechanical appurtenance(s) could not be readily utilized in lieu of the swivel-ell connection, nor result in the recycled water use site being supplied concurrently by recycled water and drinking water.

D. The recycled water supply line used in conjunction with the swivel-ell must be the only recycled water supply to the recycled water use area.

E. The swivel-ell must be located as close as practical to the public water system service connection, with the swivel-ell connection being located as close as practical to the RP upstream of the swivel-ell.

F. The swivel-ell must:

1. be located above ground;

2. be color-coded pursuant to section 116815 of the CHSC and its implementing regulations;

3. include appropriate signage, as required by regulation and the State Water Board;

4. be provided the security necessary to prevent interconnections, vandalism, unauthorized entry, etc.; and

5. be provided with meters on both the recycled water service and drinking water service connections.

City of Brea Cross Connec�on Control Management Plan (CCCMP) DRAFT City of Brea CCCMP – March 2025
Legend for Diagram 9a and 9b (also see next page)
RP = Reduced pressure principle backflow preven�on assembly RW = Ter�ary-treated recycled water origina�ng from wastewater treatment facility DW = Drinking water origina�ng from a public water system W = Water (ter�ary recycled water or drinking water) to use site. As pictured, configured for supplemental drinking water to the use site.

M = Meter (next page)
PE = Plain End (next page)
GRV = Groove (next page)
PWS= Public Water System (next page)
Diagram A: Example Swivel-Ell Pictorial (also see Plan View Schematics) Note: The RP, a required component of an acceptable swivel-ell, is not shown in the picture.

City of Brea Cross Connec�on Control Management Plan (CCCMP) DRAFT City of Brea CCCMP – March 2025
City of Brea Cross Connec�on Control Management Plan (CCCMP) DRAFT City of Brea CCCMP – March 2025
Diagram B: Swivel-Ell Typical Plan View Schema�cs (not intended to be an exact portrayal of the pictorial) City of Brea Cross Connec�on Control Management Plan (CCCMP) DRAFT City of Brea CCCMP – March 2025
Appendix I
City Records Retention Policy
City of Brea Cross Connec�on Control Management Plan (CCCMP) DRAFT City of Brea CCCMP – March 2025
City Records Retention Policy
City of Brea Cross Connec�on Control Management Plan (CCCMP) DRAFT City of Brea CCCMP – March 2025
Appendix J
Cross-Connection Incident Response Form
City of Brea Cross Connec�on Control Management Plan (CCCMP) DRAFT City of Brea CCCMP – March 2025
Cross Connection Incident Report Form

CALL DETAILS

1. Caller Name: Phone number:

2. Call Date: Time:

3. Location address:

Street Number Street Name City

4. Name of
ownership/business:

ISSUE DESCRIBED BY CALLER

5. Estimated start date & time:

6. Description of issue:

7. Name of City of Brea Inspector:

ON SITE DETAILS

8. Site conditions: (Check all that apply)
Meter Protection
Last Test Date:

Circle: PASS FAIL
Designated Industrial Line
Dual Plumbed Bldg.

Cooling Tower
Kitchen/Cafeteria
Recycled Water onsite
Cooling Tower
Chemical Pumps/Motors
Laboratory
Multiple
Tenants
Notes:

9. Number of persons in the building:

10. OCHCA Notified:
(714) 955-3963 or
[email protected]
YES NO
If yes, name: Date & Time of Notice:

City of Brea Cross Connec�on Control Management Plan (CCCMP) DRAFT City of Brea CCCMP – March 2025
Appendix K
Consumer Confidence Report
City of Brea Cross Connec�on Control Management Plan (CCCMP) DRAFT City of Brea CCCMP – March 2025
Consumer Confidence Report
City of Brea Cross Connec�on Control Management Plan (CCCMP) DRAFT City of Brea CCCMP – March 2025
Appendix L
City Standard Specifications and/or
drawings
City of Brea Cross Connec�on Control Management Plan (CCCMP) DRAFT City of Brea CCCMP – March 2025
City Standard Specifications
and/or drawings
__________, 2025
ORD. ____
3101783.2 1
ORDINANCE NO. ____

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BREA

AMENDING THE BREA CITY CODE TO UPDATE BACKFLOW AND

CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROLS AND APPROVING A CEQA

EXEMPTION DETERMINATION
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BREA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

A. RECITALS:
(i) On December 19, 2023, in accordance with Health and Safety Code Section 116407, the State Water Resources Control Board (“State Water Board”) adopted a Cross-Connection Control Policy Handbook (“CCCPH”) to establish standards and principles for California’s public water systems. (ii) On March 19, 2025, the State Water Board amended the CCCPH to clarify deadlines imposed on public water systems.
(iii) The City has prepared a Cross-Connection Control Management Plan (“CCCMP”) in accordance with the CCCPH.
(iv) This Ordinance updates the backflow and cross-connection control regulations in the City Code to facilitate compliance with the CCCPH and implementation of the CCCMP.
(v) This Ordinance is a valid exercise of the local police power and in accord with State law.
(vi) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred.

B. ORDINANCE:

SECTION 1. Declaration. The facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A of this Ordinance, are true and correct.
__________, 2025
ORD. ____
3101783.2 2
SECTION 2. Code Amendment. Chapter 13.16 (Backflow and Cross-Connection Controls) of Title 13 (Utilities) of Part I (Municipal Code) of the Brea City Code is amended to read as follows:
“CHAPTER 13.16: BACKFLOW AND CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROLS

13.16.010 LEGISLATIVE POLICY AND INTENT.

A. It is the intent of the City Council, in enacting this Chapter 13.16, to enhance the health, safety and welfare of the community and to protect the public water supply of the city from contamination or pollution by isolating within the water customer’s internal distribution or private water system contaminants or pollutants which could backflow into the public water system.

B. Further, it is the intent of this Council to promote the elimination or control of existing cross-connections, actual or potential, between in-plant potable water systems and nonpotable water systems, plumbing fixtures and industrial piping systems, and to provide for a continuing program of cross-connection control which will systematically and effectively prevent the contamination or pollution of the city’s water system.

C. Further, it is a major goal of this Council to ensure the distribution of a safe and potable water supply to all domestic water users. In order for the city to achieve this goal, a Cross-Connection Control Management Plan has been developed pursuant to the State Water Resources Control Board’s Cross-Connection Control Policy Handbook, which applies to all California public water systems.

D. Nothing contained in this Chapter 13.16 shall be construed to abrogate or supersede any provision or provisions of the Uniform Plumbing Code, as most recently __________, 2025
ORD. ____
3101783.2 3
adopted by this Council, and the provisions of such Uniform Plumbing Code shall be considered complementary and an addition to the requirements of this Chapter 13.16.

13.16.020 DEFINITIONS.

For the purpose of this chapter, the definitions in the then-current edition of the Cross-Connection Control Policy Handbook (CCCPH) adopted by the State Water Resources Control Board and the then-current edition of the Cross-Connection Control Management Plan (CCCMP) adopted by the Council shall apply unless the context clearly indicates or requires a different meaning.

13.16.030 ENFORCEMENT.

The Director of Public Works (Director) shall enforce the provisions of this chapter and the CCCMP or shall designate a Program Coordinator (Coordinator) to perform such enforcement. The Director or Coordinator shall have the responsibility for making interpretations of this chapter, issuing operating permits, for deciding upon the approval of materials, equipment and devices required to be installed hereunder and establishing approved testing facilities.

13.16.040 BACKFLOW PREVENTION DEVICES.

A. Where required. An approved backflow prevention assembly shall also be installed on each service line to the customer system at or near the property line or immediately inside the building being served, but in all cases before the first branch line leading off the service line, wherever the following conditions exist:

1. In the case of premises having an auxiliary water supply which is not or may not be of safe bacteriological or chemical quality and which has not been accepted as an additional source by the city, the public water system shall be protected __________, 2025
ORD. ____
3101783.2 4
against backflow from the premises by installing an approved backflow prevention assembly in the service line appropriate to the degree of hazard.

2. In the case of premises on which any industrial fluids or any other objectionable substance is handled in such a fashion as to create an actual or potential hazard to the public water system, the public system shall be protected against backflow from the premises by installing an approved backflow prevention assembly in the service line appropriate to the degree of hazard. This shall include the handling of process waters and waters originating from the utility system which have been subject to deterioration in quality.

3. In the case of premises having internal cross-connection that cannot be permanently corrected or controlled; or intricate plumbing and piping arrangements or where entry to all portions of the premises is not readily accessible for inspection purposes, making it impracticable or impossible to ascertain whether or not dangerous cross-connections exist, the public water system shall be protected against backflow from the premises by installing an approved backflow prevention assembly in the service line.

4. In the event that the provisions of the CCCPH as the same may be amended from time to time or its successor provisions, pertaining to where backflow and cross-connection devices are required, mandate greater or more stringent requirements than as set forth in this § 13.16.040, then such provisions shall apply notwithstanding the provisions of this § 13.16.040.

B. Type required. The type of protective assembly required for the premises shall depend upon the degree of hazard which exists, as follows:
__________, 2025
ORD. ____
3101783.2 5

1. In the case of any premises where there is an auxiliary water supply as stated in paragraph A. above of this section and it is not subject to any of the following rules, the public water system shall be protected by an approved air-gap separation or an approved reduced pressure principle backflow prevention assembly.

2. In the case of any premises where there is water of a substance that would be objectionable but not hazardous to health, if introduced into the public water system, the public water system shall be protected by an approved double check valve assembly at each service connection.

3. In the case of any premises where there is any material dangerous to health which is handled in such a fashion as to create an actual or potential hazard to the public water system, the public water system shall be protected by an approved airgap separation or an approved reduced pressure principle backflow prevention assembly at each service connection. Examples of premises where these conditions exist, include, but are not limited to, sewage treatment plants, sewage pumping stations, chemical manufacturing plants, hospitals, mortuaries and plating plants.

4. In the case of any premises where there are uncontrolled crossconnections, either actual or potential, the public water system shall be protected by an approved air-gap separation or an approved reduced pressure principle backflow prevention assembly at each service connection.

5. In the case of any premises where, because of security requirements or other prohibitions or restrictions, it is impossible or impractical to make a complete in-plant cross-connection survey, the public water system shall be protected against backflow from the premises by either an approved air-gap separation or an __________, 2025
ORD. ____
3101783.2 6
approved reduced pressure principle backflow prevention assembly on each service connection to the premises.

6. In the event that the provisions of the CCCPH as the same may be amended from time to time or its successor provisions, pertaining to the type of backflow and cross-connection devices required to be installed for a given degree of hazard, mandate a different or more stringent requirement for a given degree of hazard, then such provisions shall apply notwithstanding the provisions of this paragraph B.

C. Approval.

AWWA C506-84 Standards for Reduced Pressure Principle and Double Check Valve Backflow Prevention Devices; and that meets laboratory and field performance specifications of the Foundation for Cross-Connection Control and Hydraulic Research of the University of Southern California established by:

Specifications of Backflow Prevention
Assemblies § 10 of the most current issue of the Manual of CrossConnection Control.

2. AWWA standards and specifications have been adopted by the Director. Final approval shall be evidenced by a “certificate of approval” issued by an __________, 2025
ORD. ____
3101783.2 7
approved testing laboratory certifying full compliance with such AWWA standards and specifications.

13.16.050 OPERATING PERMIT REQUIRED.

A. Required. It shall be unlawful for any person, firm, partnership or corporation which is a water customer of the city and whose premises requires the installation and maintenance of a backflow prevention device to obtain water from the city without first obtaining an operating permit issued by the Director or Coordinator and approval the backflow prevention device(s) installed, or to be installed, at the premises and otherwise complying with any and all terms and provisions of this chapter.

B. Application. Every person, firm, partnership or corporation required to obtain an operating permit hereunder shall make application to the Director or Coordinator for issuance of such operating permit prior to commencement of any activities requiring the installation of a backflow prevention device. Such application shall be in the form prescribed by the Director or Coordinator and shall include therein the following information:

1. Location of premises.

2. Numbered and location of service connections.

3. Name, model and type of device proposed to be installed and the location thereof.

4. Type of use requiring installation of backflow prevention device; i.e., process water, contaminated water, plating operation, and the like.

5. Plans and specifications as necessary to show the method of operation of the customer’s premises.
__________, 2025
ORD. ____
3101783.2 8

6. Such other and further information as the Director or Coordinator may require.

7. The application shall be executed by the owner, or authorized representative thereof, under penalty of perjury as to the truth of the facts contained therein.

C. Renewal. Any water customer upon whose premises exists a previously approved backflow prevention device shall provide the Director or Coordinator the information required under paragraph A. above, certifying, under penalty of perjury, that the conditions under which the operating permit was initially issued have not changed or, if changed, the changed conditions existing at the premises.

D. Inspection. Upon approval by the Director or Coordinator of the type of backflow prevention device to be installed, and the location thereof, the customer shall obtain any and all building, plumbing, mechanical or other permits required by the city code and cause the same to be installed in accordance therewith. Upon installation, and prior to operation of the facility, the backflow prevention device shall be inspected and subjected to such testing as the Director or Coordinator may require to ensure proper operation thereof. Upon successful completion of such inspection and testing, the Director or Coordinator shall issue the operating permit.

E. Annual inspection. Every person, firm, partnership or corporation required to install and maintain a backflow prevention device pursuant to the provisions of this chapter shall have such device tested and inspected by the Director or Coordinator, at least annually. Failure to allow such inspection and testing, or failure of the device to pass any such test or inspection in accordance with the standards imposed hereby, __________, 2025
ORD. ____
3101783.2 9
shall be grounds for cessation of water service to the premises. Except where the Director or Coordinator determines that the public health and safety mandate the immediate disconnection of the premises from the city water supply, the Director or Coordinator shall provide to the water customer a reasonable time, not to exceed ten (10) days, to repair or replace the defective device and cause the same to be tested and inspected, or to permit entry to the premises for inspection and testing.

F. Additional inspections. In the event the Director or Coordinator determines, or has reasonable cause to believe, that a backflow prevention device has been disconnected or tampered with, or the device has failed to operate properly, the Director or Coordinator may require an inspection and testing thereof. In addition, the Director or Coordinator may establish a testing and/or inspection program to monitor such devices on a basis consistent with any apparent threat to the public health, safety or welfare.

G. Fees. In addition to any other fees or charges levied or imposed by the city code for building, plumbing, mechanical or other permits for installation, any person, firm, partnership or corporation required to install and maintain a backflow prevention device shall pay the fee established by resolution of the City Council for the operating permit and inspection and testing of backflow prevention devices required by this chapter.

13.16.060 RIGHT OF ENTRY.

A. The Director or Coordinator shall have the authority to enter any building or premises for the purpose of investigating the existence of suspected or reported damage, defects, disconnection or tampering with an approved backflow prevention __________, 2025
ORD. ____
3101783.2 10
device, or to determine whether or not such a device is required on the premises, in order to protect the public water supply and the public health, safety and welfare of the community. In addition, the Director or Coordinator is authorized to enter any building or premises in order to inspect any backflow prevention device for purposes of issuing an operating permit.

B. Except in emergency situations, the Director or Coordinator shall not enter any building or premises without the consent of the owner or occupant thereof, unless he or she possesses a search warrant authorizing entry and search of the premises. No person shall hinder or prevent the Director or Coordinator while in the performance of the duties herein described as emergency situations or while in possession of a search warrant, from entering upon and into any and all premises under his or her jurisdiction, at all reasonable hours, for the purpose of inspecting the same to determine whether or not the provisions of this chapter and all other applicable laws or ordinances pertaining to the protection of persons or property are observed therein.

13.16.070 APPEALS.

A decision of the Director or Coordinator regarding the interpretation or implementation of any provision of this chapter shall be final and shall become effective forthwith upon the service of the decision of the Director or Coordinator, in writing, upon the applicant or water customer. For purposes of this section, service upon the applicant or water customer shall mean either personal delivery or placement in the United States mail, postage prepaid, and addressed to the applicant or water customer at his or her last known business address; provided, however, that the applicant or water customer may, within ten (10) days after the effective date of the decision of the __________, 2025
ORD. ____
3101783.2 11
Director or Coordinator, file an appeal with the City Clerk, in writing, specifying the reason or reasons for the appeal and requesting that the board of appeals review the decision of the Director or Coordinator.

13.16.080 BOARD OF APPEALS.

The City Council shall act as a Board of Appeals in making a final determination of any appeal filed in accordance with this chapter. The City Clerk shall schedule a hearing on the appeal at reasonable times at the convenience of the Board of Appeals, but not later than thirty (30) days after receipt of the written appeal. The applicant or water customer may appear in person before the Board or be represented by an attorney and may introduce evidence to support his or her claim. The Director or Coordinator shall transmit to the Board all records, papers, documents and other materials in support of his or her decision and shall provide a copy thereof to the person appealing the decision of the Director or Coordinator. The person appealing the decision of the Director or Coordinator shall cause, at his or her own expense, any tests or research required by the Board to substantiate his or her claim to be performed or otherwise carried out. The Board may continue such appeal hearing from time to time as deemed necessary by the Board. The Board may, by resolution, affirm, reverse, or modify, in whole or in part, any appealed decision, determination or interpretation of the Director or Coordinator. A copy of the resolution adopted by the Board shall be mailed to the appellant and the Board’s decision shall be final upon the mailing, by United States mail, postage prepaid, to the appellant’s last known address of record and the decision of the Board shall be final upon the mailing of such resolution.

13.16.090 FINDINGS BY CITY COUNCIL.
__________, 2025
ORD. ____
3101783.2 12
The City Council hereby finds the failure to install and/or properly maintain any required backflow prevention device in good working order by any person constitutes a public nuisance.”
SECTION 3. CEQA. The City Council finds and determines that adoption of this Ordinance is exempt from California Environmental Quality Act review pursuant to statutory and categorical exemptions including California Code of Regulations Title 14, Section 15061(b)(3).

SECTION 4. Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions be declared invalid or unconstitutional.

SECTION 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance.

APPROVED AND ADOPTED this __ day of __________, 2025.
________________________________
Blair Stewart, Mayor
ATTEST: _____________________________
Lillian Harris-Neal, City Clerk
__________, 2025
ORD. ____
3101783.2 13
I, Lillian Harris-Neal, City Clerk of the City of Brea, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Brea held on the ___ day of ___________, 2025, and was finally passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Brea held on the ____ day of ___________, 2025, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

DATED: _______________, 2025
________________________________
Lillian Harris-Neal, City Clerk
3103146.1
RESOLUTION NO.

A RESOLUTION OF THE BREA CITY COUNCIL APPROVING A CROSSCONNECTION CONTROL MANAGEMENT POLICY A. RECITALS:
(i) On December 19, 2023, in accordance with Health and Safety Code Section 116407, the State Water Resources Control Board (“State Water Board”) adopted a Cross-Connection Control Policy Handbook (“CCCPH”) to establish standards and principles for California’s public water systems.
(ii) On March 19, 2025, the State Water Board amended the CCCPH to clarify deadlines imposed on public water systems.
(iii) The City has prepared a Cross-Connection Control Management Plan (“CCCMP”) in accordance with the CCCPH.
(iv) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.

B. RESOLUTION:

NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council finds and resolves as follows:

1. The facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, above, are true and correct.

2. The CCCMP contained in the agenda packet for the City Council’s May 6, 2025 meeting is approved.

3. The Public Works Director is authorized to submit the CCCMP to the State Water Resources Board for review. The Public Works Director, and any Program Coordinator designated by the Director, shall administer and enforce the CCCMP with any revisions required by the State Water Resources Board.

APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 6th day of May, 2025.
________________________________
Blair Stewart, Mayor
3103146.1
ATTEST: _____________________________
Lillian Harris-Neal, City Clerk
-2-
BREA CITY CODE CHAPTER 13.16 UPDATE
- 1 of 10 - 3101645.2
Text to be added shown in italics
Text to be deleted shown in strike-through
CHAPTER 13.16: BACKFLOW AND CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROLS

13.16.010 LEGISLATIVE POLICY AND INTENT.

D. Nothing contained in this Chapter 13.16 shall be construed to abrogate or supersede any provision or provisions of the Uniform Plumbing Code, as most recently adopted by this Council, and the provisions of said such Uniform Plumbing Code shall be considered complementary and an addition to the requirements of this Chapter

13.16. 13.16.020 DEFINITIONS.

For the purpose of this chapter, the following definitions in the then-current edition of the Cross-Connection Control Policy Handbook (CCCPH) adopted by the State Water Resources Control Board and the then-current edition of the CrossConnection Control Management Plan (CCCMP) adopted by the Council shall apply unless the context clearly indicates or requires a different meaning.

AIR-GAP. The unobstructed vertical distance through the free atmosphere between the lowest opening from any pipe or faucet supplying water to a tank, plumbing fixture, or other device and the flood level rim of said vessel. An approved air-gap shall be at least double the diameter of the supply pipe, measured vertically, above the overflow rim of the vessel, and in no case less than one (1") inch.

APPROVED. Accepted by the Director as meeting an applicable specification stated in this chapter, or as suitable for the proposed use. - 2 of 10 - 3101645.2
AUXILIARY WATER SUPPLY. Any water supply on or available to the premises other than the city's public water supply will be considered as an auxiliary water supply.

Auxiliary waters may include water from another public or private water supply or any natural source(s) such as a well, spring, river, stream, harbor, and the like, or “used waters” or “industrial fluids.” These waters may be contaminated or polluted or they may be objectionable and constitute an unacceptable water source over which the city does not have sanitary control.

BACKFLOW. The reversal of the normal flow of water caused by either back pressure or back siphonage.

BACKFLOW PREVENTER. An assembly or means designed to prevent backflow.

BACK PRESSURE. The flow of water or other liquids, mixtures or substances under pressure into the distribution pipes of a potable water supply system from any source or sources other than the intended source.

BACKSIPHONAGE. The flow of water or other liquids, mixtures or substances into the distribution pipes of a potable water supply from any source other than its intended source caused by the reduction of pressure in the potable water supply system.

CONTAMINATION. An impairment of the quality of potable water by sewage, industrial fluids or waste liquids, compounds or other materials to a degree which creates an actual or potential hazard to the public health through poisoning or through the spread of disease.

CROSS-CONNECTION. Any physical connection or arrangement of piping or fixtures between two (2) otherwise separate piping systems, one of which contains potable water and the other non potable water or industrial fluids of questionable safety, through which, or because of which, backflow may occur into the city's water system.

This includes, but it is not limited to, any temporary connections, such as swing connections, removable sections, four (4) way plug valves, spools, dummy section of pipe, swivel or change-over devices or sliding multiport tube.

CROSS-CONNECTIONS — CONTROLLED. A connection between the city's water system and a nonpotable water system with an approved backflow prevention assembly properly installed and maintained so that it will continuously afford protection commensurate with the degree of hazard.

CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL BY CONTAINMENT. The installation of an approved backflow prevention assembly at the water service connection to any customer's premises where it is physically and economically unfeasible to find and permanently eliminate or control all actual or potential cross-connections within the customer’s water system. Alternatively, it shall mean the installation of an approved backflow prevention assembly on the service line leading to and supplying a portion of a - 3 of 10 - 3101645.2
customer's water system where there are actual or potential cross-connections which cannot be effectively eliminated or controlled at the point of the cross-connection.

DIRECTOR. The Director of Maintenance Services or his or her designee.

DOUBLE CHECK VALVE ASSEMBLY. An assembly of two (2) independently operating approved check valves with tightly closing shut-off valves on each end of the check valves, plus properly located test cocks for the testing of each check valve. The entire assembly shall meet the design and performance specifications as determined by a laboratory and field evaluation program resulting in an approval by a recognized and city approved testing agency for backflow prevention assemblies. To be approved, these assemblies must be readily accessible for in-line testing and maintenance.

HAZARD, DEGREE OF. The term derived from an evaluation of the potential risk to public health and the adverse effect of the hazard upon the potable water system and includes the following:

1. HAZARD - HEALTH. Any condition, device, or practice in the water supply system and its operation which could create, or in the judgment of the Director, may create a danger to the health and well-being of the water customer.

2. HAZARD - PLUMBING. A plumbing type cross- connection into a customer's potable water system that has not been properly protected by an approved air-gap or approved backflow prevention assembly.

3. HAZARD - POLLUTIONAL. An actual or potential threat to the physical properties of the water system or to the potability of the public or the customer's potable water system which may constitute a nuisance or be aesthetically objectionable or could cause damage to the system or its appurtenances, but would not be dangerous to health.

4. HAZARD - SYSTEM. An actual or potential threat of severe damage to the physical properties of the city's water system or the customers potable water system or of pollution or contamination which would have a protracted effect on the quality of the potable water in the system.

INDUSTRIAL FLUIDS SYSTEM. Any system containing a fluid or solution which may be chemically, biologically or otherwise contaminated or polluted in a form or concentration such as would constitute a health, system, pollutional or plumbing hazard if introduced into an approved water supply. This may include, but is not limited to:
polluted or contaminated water; all types of process waters and “used waters” originating from the public potable water system which may have deteriorated in sanitary quality; chemicals in fluid form; plating acids and alkalines, circulating cooling waters connected to an open cooling tower and/or cooling towers that are chemically or biologically treated or stabilized with toxic substances; contaminated natural waters such as from wells, springs, streams, rivers, irrigation canals or systems, and the like; oils, gases, glycerine, paraffins, caustic and acid solutions and other liquid and gaseous fluids used in industrial or other purposes or for fire-fighting purposes. - 4 of 10 - 3101645.2
POLLUTION. The presence of any foreign substance (organic, inorganic, or biological) in water which tends to degrade its quality so as to constitute a hazard or impair the usefulness or quality of the water to a degree which does not create an actual hazard to the public health but which does adversely and unreasonably affect such waters for domestic use.

REDUCED PRESSURE PRINCIPLE ASSEMBLY. An assembly of two (2) independently acting approved check valves together with a hydraulically operating, mechanically independent differential pressure relief valve located between the check valves and at the same time below the first check valve. The unit shall include properly located test cocks and tightly closing shut-off valves at each end of the assembly. The entire assembly shall meet the design and performance specifications as determined by a laboratory and a field evaluation program resulting in an approval by a recognized and city approved testing agency for backflow prevention assemblies. The assembly shall operate to maintain the pressure in the zone between the two (2) check valves at an acceptable level less than the pressure on the public water supply side of the assembly.

At cessation of a normal flow, the pressure between the two (2) check valves shall be less than the pressure on the public water supply side of the device. In case of leakage of either of the check valves, the differential relief valve shall operate to maintain the reduced pressure in the zone between the check valves by discharging to the atmosphere. When the inlet pressure is two (2) pounds per square inch or less, the relief valve shall open to the atmosphere. To be approved, these assemblies must be readily accessible for in-line testing and maintenance and be installed in location where no part of the assembly will be submerged.

WATER - NONPOTABLE. Water which is not safe for human consumption or which is of questionable potability.

WATER - POTABLE. Any water which, according to recognized standards, is safe for human consumption.

WATER - SERVICE CONNECTION. The terminal end of a service connection from the city's potable water system. If a meter is installed at the end of the service connection, then the service connection shall mean the downstream end of the meter.

There shall be no unprotected takeoffs from the service line ahead of any meter or any backflow prevention assembly located at the point of delivery to the customer's water system. Service connection shall also include water service connection from a fire hydrant and all other temporary or emergency water service connections from the public potable water system.

WATER SYSTEM. The water system shall be considered as made up of two (2) parts: The utility system and the customer system.

1. The utility system shall consist of the source facilities and the distribution systems and shall include all those facilities of the water system under the complete control of the city, up to the point where the customer system begins. - 5 of 10 - 3101645.2

2. The customer system shall include those parts of the facilities beyond the termination of the utility system which are utilized in conveying domestic water to points of use.

13.16.030 ENFORCEMENT.

The Director of Maintenance Services Public Works (Director) shall enforce the provisions of this chapter and the CCCMP or shall designate a Program Coordinator (Coordinator) to perform such enforcement. The Director or Coordinator shall have the responsibility for making interpretations of this chapter, issuing operating permits, for deciding upon the approval of materials, equipment and devices required to be installed hereunder and establishing approved testing facilities.

13.16.040 BACKFLOW PREVENTION DEVICES.

1. In the case of premises having an auxiliary water supply which is not or may not be of safe bacteriological or chemical quality and which has not been accepted as an additional source by the city, the public water system shall be protected against backflow from the premises by installing an approved backflow prevention assembly in the service line appropriate to the degree of hazard.

4. In the event that the provisions of California Code of Regulations, Title 17 the CCCPH as the same may be amended from time to time or its successor provisions, pertaining to where backflow and cross-connection devices are required, mandate greater or more stringent requirements than as set forth in this § 13.16.040, then such provisions of said Title 17 pertaining thereto shall apply notwithstanding the provisions of this § 13.16.040.
- 6 of 10 - 3101645.2
B. Type required. The type of protective assembly required for the premises shall depend upon the degree of hazard which exists, as follows:

5. In the case of any premises where, because of security requirements or other prohibitions or restrictions, it is impossible or impractical to make a complete in-plant cross-connection survey, the public water system shall be protected against backflow from the premises by either an approved air-gap separation or an approved reduced pressure principle backflow prevention assembly on each service connection to the premises.

6. In the event that the provisions of California Code of Regulations, Title 17, the CCCPH as the same may be amended from time to time or its successor provisions, pertaining to the type of backflow and cross-connection devices required to be installed for a given degree of hazard, mandate a different or more stringent requirement for a given degree of hazard, then such provisions of said Title 17 pertaining thereto shall apply notwithstanding the provisions of this paragraph B.

C. Approval.

1. Any backflow prevention assembly required herein shall be a model and size approved by the Director or Coordinator. The term “approved backflow prevention assembly” shall mean an assembly that has been manufactured in full conformance with the standards established by the American Water Works Association entitled:
- 7 of 10 - 3101645.2
AWWA C506-84 Standards for Reduced Pressure Principle and Double Check Valve Backflow Prevention Devices; and that meets laboratory and field performance specifications of the Foundation for Cross-Connection Control and Hydraulic Research of the University of Southern California established by:

Specifications of Backflow Prevention
Assemblies § 10 of the most current issue of the Manual of CrossConnection Control.

2. Said AWWA and FCCC&HR standards and specifications have been adopted by the Director. Final approval shall be evidenced by a “certificate of approval” issued by an approved testing laboratory certifying full compliance with said such AWWA standards and FCCC&HR specifications.

3. The Director shall formulate a list of approved testing laboratories.

13.16.050 OPERATING PERMIT REQUIRED.

1. Location of premises.

2. Numbered and location of service connections.

3. Name, model and type of device proposed to be installed and the location thereof.

4. Type of use requiring installation of backflow prevention device; i.e., process water, contaminated water, plating operation, and the like.

5. Plans and specifications as necessary to show the method of operation of the customer’s premises.

6. Such other and further information as the Director or Coordinator may require.
- 8 of 10 - 3101645.2

7. The application shall be executed by the owner, or authorized representative thereof, under penalty of perjury as to the truth of the facts contained therein.

E. Annual inspection. Every person, firm, partnership or corporation required to install and maintain a backflow prevention device pursuant to the provisions of this chapter shall have such device tested and inspected by the Director or Coordinator, at least annually. Failure to allow such inspection and testing, or failure of the device to pass any such test or inspection in accordance with the standards imposed hereby, shall be grounds for cessation of water service to the premises. Except where the Director or Coordinator determines that the public health and safety mandate the immediate disconnection of the premises from the city water supply, the Director or Coordinator shall provide to the water customer a reasonable time, not to exceed ten (10) days, to repair or replace the defective device and cause the same to be tested and inspected, or to permit entry to the premises for inspection and testing.

G. Existing devices. All presently installed backflow prevention assemblies which do not meet the requirements of this chapter but were approved devices for the purposes described herein at the time of installation and which have been properly maintained, shall, except for the inspection and maintenance requirements imposed hereby, be excluded from the requirements of these rules so long as the Director is assured that they will satisfactorily protect the utility system. Whenever the existing device is moved from the present location or requires more than minimum maintenance or when the Director finds that the maintenance thereof constitutes a hazard to health, - 9 of 10 - 3101645.2
the unit shall be replaced by an approved backflow prevention assembly meeting the requirements of this chapter.

HG. Fees. In addition to any other fees or charges levied or imposed by the city code for building, plumbing, mechanical or other permits for installation, any person, firm, partnership or corporation required to install and maintain a backflow prevention device shall pay the fee established by resolution of the City Council for the operating permit and inspection and testing of backflow prevention devices required by this chapter.

13.16.060 RIGHT OF ENTRY.

A. The Director or Coordinator shall have the authority to enter any building or premises for the purpose of investigating the existence of suspected or reported damage, defects, disconnection or tampering with an approved backflow prevention device, or to determine whether or not such a device is required on the premises, in order to protect the public water supply and the public health, safety and welfare of the community. In addition, the Director or Coordinator is authorized to enter any building or premises in order to inspect any backflow prevention device for purposes of issuing an operating permit.

13.16.070 APPEALS.

A decision of the Director or Coordinator regarding the interpretation or implementation of any provision of this chapter shall be final and shall become effective forthwith upon the service of the decision of the Director or Coordinator, in writing, upon the applicant or water customer. For purposes of this section, service upon the applicant or water customer shall mean either personal delivery or placement in the United States mail, postage prepaid, and addressed to the applicant or water customer at his or her last known business address; provided, however, that the applicant or water customer may, within ten (10) days after the effective date of the decision of the Director or Coordinator, file an appeal with the City Clerk, in writing, specifying the reason or reasons for the appeal and requesting that the board of appeals review the decision of the Director or Coordinator.

13.16.080 BOARD OF APPEALS.
- 10 of 10 - 3101645.2
The City Council shall act as a Board of Appeals in making a final determination of any appeal filed in accordance with this chapter. The City Clerk shall schedule a hearing on the appeal at reasonable times at the convenience of the Board of Appeals, but not later than thirty (30) days after receipt of the written appeal. The applicant or water customer may appear in person before the Board or be represented by an attorney and may introduce evidence to support his or her claim. The Director or Coordinator shall transmit to the Board all records, papers, documents and other materials in support of his or her decision and shall provide a copy thereof to the person appealing the decision of the Director or Coordinator. The person appealing the decision of the Director or Coordinator shall cause, at his or her own expense, any tests or research required by the Board to substantiate his or her claim to be performed or otherwise carried out. The Board may continue such appeal hearing from time to time as deemed necessary by the Board. The Board may, by resolution, affirm, reverse, or modify, in whole or in part, any appealed decision, determination or interpretation of the Director or Coordinator. A copy of the resolution adopted by the Board shall be mailed to the appellant and the Board’s decision shall be final upon the mailing, by United States mail, postage prepaid, to the appellant’s last known address of record and the decision of the Board shall be final upon the mailing of such resolution.

13.16.090 FINDINGS BY CITY COUNCIL.

The City Council hereby finds the failure to install and/or properly maintain any required backflow prevention device in good working order by any person constitutes a public nuisance.

City of Brea
City Council Regular Meeting Communication
B. Ordinance to Amend the Brea City Code Chapter 16.08: Fireworks Meeting
Tuesday, May 6, 2025, 7:00 PM
Agenda Group
ADMINISTRATIVE ITEMS Item: 4B.

TO
Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
FROM
Kristin Griffith, City Manager

RECOMMENDATION
Waive full reading of and introduce Ordinance No. 1262, "An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Brea amending the Brea City Code to update the fireworks ban and approving a CEQA Exemption" by title only.

BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION
Brea City Code Section 16.08.010 prohibits the sale, use, or discharge of any fireworks including “safe and sane fireworks” as defined by the State. Fireworks pose significant safety risks to the residents of Brea and increase the potential for wildfires, especially in hillside areas. Despite previous enforcement efforts, illegal fireworks usage continues to be a pervasive issue. The discharge of commercial-style fireworks mortars, in particular, has become increasingly prevalent, leading to heightened concerns for public safety and property damage.

Past enforcement strategies have included community outreach and education, coordinated police and fire proactive patrols, and increased fines, yet these measures have not deterred violators effectively. To address these challenges, proposed Ordinance No. 1262 will amend Chapter 16.08 of the City Code to enhance enforcement capabilities. Additionally, enforcement will be made more effective by the use of innovative strategies such as the Brea Police Department’s new Drone as First Responder (DFR) program.

PUBLIC SAFETY & FIRE RISK CONCERNS:

Recent data from the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) and U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) highlights the dangers of fireworks:

In 2023, an estimated 9,700 fireworks-related injuries were treated in U.S. hospital emergency rooms, slightly down from 10,200 injuries in 2022
60% of injuries affected individuals 0 - 24 years of age.

In 2022, fireworks were started an estimated 31,302 fires, including 3,504 structure fires, 887 vehicle fires 26,492 outside fires, and 418 unclassified fires Fireworks have been a contributing factor in numerous wildfires, with dry conditions in Southern California exacerbating the risk.

Given Brea’s proximity to wildfire-prone areas, stricter enforcement measures are imperative to prevent catastrophic fires and protect residents and properties.

PROPOSED CODE AMENDMENT & ENFORCEMENT STRATEGIES:

The proposed amendment includes the following key provisions:

Prohibits “hosts” from permitting or failing to prevent the sale, use, or discharge of fireworks on their property or on an adjacent public or private street or sidewalk.

Enhances administrative fines for repeat offenders
Incorporates statutory mandate that State Fire Marshal be reimbursed for costs associated with disposal of “dangerous fireworks” as defined by the State.

The Brea Police Department’s proposed enforcement strategies include:

Expanded deterrent and enforcement tools, such as:

Implementation of a public education campaign to:

Increase awareness of the dangers and penalties associated with illegal fireworks & Increase awareness of the amended ordinance and innovative strategies that will be used to enforce it.

Utilization of the Brea Police Department’s UAS and DFR programs to detect, track, and collect evidence of illegal fireworks activity in real time.

Coordination between law enforcement, fire department and code enforcement teams.

FISCAL IMPACT/SUMMARY
There is a potential for revenue increase due to fines, but there are no known expenditures directly related to the amendment of this ordinance.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED:

Kristin Griffith, City Manager
Prepared by: Adam Hawley, Chief of Police
Attachments
2025 Fireworks Ordinance Presentation.pdf
Fireworks Ordinance.pdf
redline - chapter 16.08 update (fireworks).pdf
1 Fireworks Ordinance Update
Police, Fire, & Code Enforcement

CURRENT LAW IN BREA

16.08.010 – FIREWORKS PROHIBITED
“…it shall be unlawful for any person, firm, partnership or corporation to sell, use or discharge any fireworks within the city including, but not limited to, “safe and sane” fireworks…”

1.4.090 – ADMINISTRATIVE FINES
• 1
st Offense - $100
• 2
nd Offense within 12-mo. - $200
• 3
rd and Subsequent Offenses within 12-mo. - $500
2 PROPOSED UPDATES

16.08.020(B) – DEFINITIONS
The term “host” means any person who either:

1. Owns, leases, rents, or is otherwise in lawful possession of private property.

2. Organizes, supervises, officiates, conducts, controls, or is otherwise in charge of the fireworks activity on private property or on an adjacent public or private street or sidewalk.

16.08.030 - PROHIBITION
A. It shall be unlawful for any person to sell, use, or discharge any fireworks, including safe and sane fireworks, within the city.

B. This section does not preclude the presentation of a public display of fireworks, including safe and sane fireworks, by the city or by a person under contract with the city for such purpose. 3 PROPOSED UPDATES (Cont.)

16.08.040 – HOST LIABILITY
A. It shall be unlawful for a host to permit or fail to prevent the sale, use, or discharge of fireworks, including safe and sane fireworks, on the host’s property or on an adjacent public or private street or sidewalk.

16.08.050 – PARENT LIABILITY
Every parent, guardian, or other person who has the legal care, custody, or control of any person under the age of eighteen (18) years, and who knows or reasonably should know that such minor is in violation of this chapter, may be issued an administrative citation in addition to any administrative citation issued to such minor.
4 PROPOSED UPDATES (Cont.)

16.08.060(B) -VIOLATIONS
• 1
st Offense - $250
• 2
nd Offense within 12-mo. - $500
• 3
rd and Subsequent Offenses within 12 mo. - $1,000
The administrative fine amount shall escalate regardless of whether the second or additional violations involve the same or a different provision of this chapter. 5 ENFORCEMENT PLAN
7 • Public Education
• Utilization of PD UAS & DFR Programs to Detect, Track, and Collect Evidence
• Coordinated Response between PD, FD, and Code Enforcement

RECOMMENDATION
Waive full reading and introduce Ordinance No. _____ by title only.
8 9

QUESTIONS &

FEEDBACK
__________, 2025
ORD. ____
3097915.2 1
ORDINANCE NO. ____

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BREA

AMENDING THE BREA CITY CODE TO UPDATE THE FIREWORKS

BAN AND APPROVING A CEQA EXEMPTION DETERMINATION
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BREA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

A. RECITALS:
(i) Pursuant to state law, including Health and Safety Code Section 12541, the City has the power to prohibit the sale, use, and discharge of fireworks. (ii) The City Council desires to update the City’s existing ban on fireworks to address host liability, increase administrative fines, and provide for reimbursement of State Fire Marshal costs associated with disposal of dangerous fireworks. (iii) This Ordinance is a valid exercise of the local police power and in accord with State law.
(iv) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred.

B. ORDINANCE:

SECTION 1. Declaration. The facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A of this Ordinance, are true and correct.

SECTION 2. Code Amendment. Chapter 16.08 (Fireworks) of Title 16 (Fire Safety) of Part II (Development Code) of the Brea City Code is amended to read as follows:
“CHAPTER 16.08: FIREWORKS

16.08.010 Title.

This chapter shall be known and may be cited as the “Brea Fireworks Ordinance.”

16.08.020 Definitions.

In addition to the definitions set forth in Sections 1.00.050 and 1.04.050 of this __________, 2025
ORD. ____
3097915.2 2
code, for purpose of this chapter the following definitions shall apply:

A. The terms “fireworks,” “dangerous fireworks,” and “safe and sane fireworks” shall have the respective meaning specified in the State Fireworks Law (Health and Safety Code § 12500 et seq.).

B. The term “host” means any person who either:

1. Owns, leases, rents, or is otherwise in lawful possession of private property.

2. Organizes, supervises, officiates, conducts, controls, or is otherwise in charge of the fireworks activity on private property or on an adjacent public or private street or sidewalk.

16.08.030 Prohibition.

A. It shall be unlawful for any person to sell, use, or discharge any fireworks, including safe and sane fireworks, within the city.

B. This section does not preclude the presentation of a public display of fireworks, including safe and sane fireworks, by the city or by a person under contract with the city for such purpose.

16.08.040 Host Liability.

A. It shall be unlawful for a host to permit or fail to prevent the sale, use, or discharge of fireworks, including safe and sane fireworks, on the host’s property or on an adjacent public or private street or sidewalk.

B. There is a rebuttable presumption that the record owner of a private property as shown on the county’s latest equalized property tax assessment roll, and any lessee of the property, have notice of fireworks discharge violations occurring on the __________, 2025
ORD. ____
3097915.2 3
property or on an adjacent public or private street or sidewalk.

C. This section shall not apply to a host who contacts law enforcement or fire officials for assistance in terminating the sale, use, or discharge of fireworks if the request is made before any other person contacts law enforcement or fire officials to report the activity.

16.08.050 Parent Liability.

Every parent, guardian, or other person who has the legal care, custody, or control of any person under the age of eighteen (18) years, and who knows or reasonably should know that such minor is in violation of this chapter, may be issued an administrative citation in addition to any administrative citation issued to such minor.

16.08.060 Violations.

A. Violations of this chapter shall be punishable by criminal, civil, and administrative penalties in accordance with Chapter 1.04 of this code. Each violation, whether on the same day or a different day, shall constitute a separate violation and shall be subject to a separate criminal, civil, or administrative penalty.

B. For violations of this chapter, the administrative fine shall be in the amount of two hundred fifty dollars ($250) for a first violation, five hundred dollars ($500) for a second violation, and one thousand dollars ($1,000) for each additional violation within a twelve (12) month period. The administrative fine amount shall escalate regardless of whether the second or additional violations involve the same or a different provision of this chapter.

C. Administrative fines collected for violations related to the possession of 25 pounds or less of dangerous fireworks shall not be subject to Health and Safety Code __________, 2025
ORD. ____
3097915.2 4
§ 12706. However, in addition to payment of administrative fines, the responsible person shall liable for the State Fire Marshal’s costs associated with the disposal of seized fireworks.”
SECTION 3. CEQA. The City Council finds and determines that adoption of this Ordinance is exempt from California Environmental Quality Act review pursuant to statutory and categorical exemptions including California Code of Regulations Title 14, Section 15061(b)(3).

SECTION 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance.

APPROVED AND ADOPTED this __ day of __________, 2025.
________________________________
Blair Stewart, Mayor
ATTEST: _____________________________
Lillian Harris-Neal, City Clerk
__________, 2025
ORD. ____
3097915.2 5
I, Lillian Harris-Neal, City Clerk of the City of Brea, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Brea held on the ___ day of ___________, 2025, and was finally passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Brea held on the ____ day of ___________, 2025, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

DATED: _______________, 2025
________________________________
Lillian Harris-Neal, City Clerk
BREA CITY CODE CHAPTER 16.08 UPDATE
- 1 of 1 - 3098200.3
Text to be added shown in italics
Text to be deleted shown in strike-through
CHAPTER 16.08: FIREWORKS

16.08.010 Fireworks Prohibited; Exception.

Subject to the exception set forth below in this section, it shall be unlawful for any person, firm, partnership or corporation to sell, use or discharge any fireworks within the city including, but not limited to, “safe and sane” fireworks as that term is defined in Cal.

Health & Safety Code, Part 2 of Division 11, as the same may be amended from time to time hereafter.

EXCEPTION: Nothing in this chapter shall preclude the presentation of a public display of fireworks including, but not limited to, “safe and sane” fireworks, by the city.

The City Council may contract with a person, firm, partnership or corporation to provide such public display upon terms and conditions deemed advisable by the City Council.

16.08.010 Title.

This chapter shall be known and may be cited as the “Brea Fireworks Ordinance.”

16.08.020 Definitions.

In addition to the definitions set forth in Sections 1.00.050 and 1.04.050 of this code, for purpose of this chapter the following definitions shall apply:

B. The term “host” means any person who either:

1. Owns, leases, rents, or is otherwise in lawful possession of private property.

2. Organizes, supervises, officiates, conducts, controls, or is otherwise in charge of the fireworks activity on private property or on an adjacent public or private street or sidewalk.

16.08.030 Prohibition.

A. It shall be unlawful for any person to sell, use, or discharge any fireworks, including safe and sane fireworks, within the city.
- 2 of 2 - 3098200.3
B. This section does not preclude the presentation of a public display of fireworks, including safe and sane fireworks, by the city or by a person under contract with the city for such purpose.

16.08.040 Host Liability.

B. There is a rebuttable presumption that the record owner of a private property as shown on the county’s latest equalized property tax assessment roll, and any lessee of the property, have notice of fireworks discharge violations occurring on the property or on an adjacent public or private street or sidewalk.

16.08.050 Parent Liability.

16.08.060 Violations.

C. Administrative fines collected for violations related to the possession of 25 pounds or less of dangerous fireworks shall not be subject to Health and Safety Code § 12706. However, in addition to payment of administrative fines, the responsible person shall liable for the State Fire Marshal’s costs associated with the disposal of seized fireworks.

City of Brea
City Council Regular Meeting Communication
A. April 15, 2025 Regular City Council Meeting Minutes
Meeting
Tuesday, May 6, 2025, 7:00 PM
Agenda Group
CONSENT CALENDAR Item: 5A.

TO
Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
FROM
Kristin Griffith, City Manager

RECOMMENDATION
Approve.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED:

Kristin Griffith, City Manager
Prepared by: Victoria Popescu, Deputy City Clerk
Concurrence: Lillian Harris-Neal, City Clerk
Attachments
04-15-2025 - Draft Minnutes.pdf
** The following document is a draft of the minutes and the not the official approved minutes **
Minutes for the City Council Regular Meeting
1 Civic Center Circle, Brea, California 92821
April 15, 2025
Roll Call: (The following members were in attendance)
Blair Stewart, Mayor
Cecilia Hupp, Mayor Pro Tem
Christine Marick, Council Member
Marty Simonoff, Council Member
Steve Vargas, Council Member

1. STUDY SESSION - EXECUTIVE CONFERENCE ROOM 3RD FLOOR - 6:30 P.M. 1A. Call to Order/Roll CallMayor Stewart called the Study Session to order at 6:30 p.m. All members were present. 1B. Public CommentBev Perry spoke regarding the Mercury Lane project, indicating the project is under parked by 25 spots. She inquired if there is a way to add additional parking, requested staff explore other options for adjacent off-site parking, and asked staff to contact OCTA to discuss the opportunity to add a bus stop close to the project site.
1C. Clarify Regular Meeting Topics -
Council Member Vargas announced he will be recusing himself from voting on item 4B (waive full reading of and adopt Ordinance No. 1256, An Ordinance of the City of Brea approving Zone Change No. 2024-01 for the Brea Plaza Shopping Center Residential Project) and item 4C (waive full reading of and adopt Ordinance No. 1257 An Ordinance of the City of Brea approving Zone Change No. 2024-02 for the Greenbriar Residential Development Project and Ordinance No. 1258, An Ordinance of the City of Brea approving Development Agreement No. 2024-01 by and between the City of Brea and Lennar Homes of California, LLC regarding the Greenbriar Residential Development).
1D. Project Preview: The Mercury Lane Affordable Housing Development- Assistant Planner Rubiano provided a presentation that included the a background on the Mercury Lane project, applicant information, project proposal, proposed renderings, preliminary assessment, parking, affordable housing and funds request, recommendation and next steps.

Council discussed the allocation of units between seniors and veterans, the evaluation of qualified renters, and the need for additional parking on-site parking. They also discussed other options for parking and encouraged staff to speak with Mercury to evaluate options for use of their parking structure, and with OCTA to explore placing a bus stop on Berry Street in the adjacent area. They also discussed the Fund 280 balance, the senior subsidy program, and loan terms. 1E. Council Member Reports/RequestsNone.
1F. Study Session AdjournmentMayor Stewart adjourned the Study Session at 6:54 p.m.

2. GENERAL SESSION - COUNCIL CHAMBERS PLAZA LEVEL - 7:00 P.M. 2A. Call to Order/Roll Call
Mayor Stewart called the General Session to order at 7:03 p.m. All members were present. 2B. Pledge of Allegiance: Brea Girl Scouts
Brea Girl Scouts led the Pledge of Allegiance.
2C. Invocation: Pastor Dan Crane, Formation Church
Pastor Dan Crane, Formation Church, led the invocation. 2D. Presentation: OC Free Gun Lock Program
Orange County Board of Supervisors Chairman Doug Chaffee displayed a video presentation on the OC Free Gun Locks Program. He also spoke about the program and presented Brea Police Lieutenant Haddad a Certificate of Recognition of his partnership in the OC Free Gun Locks Program.
2E. Report - Prior Study Session
City Manager Griffith provided a report on the prior Study Session. 2F. Community Announcements
Council Member Vargas announced that "Go. Serve. Brea.", a community-wide day of service, will take place on Saturday, April 26. He stated that this event is modeled after the previous, Love Brea and that volunteers are needed to work on a variety of city-wide service projects to show their love for Brea. He directed those interested in volunteering or contributing to the event to visit the City website.

Council Member Marick announced that a Wildfire Preparedness Workshop will take place on Thursday, May 29 at 6:00 p.m., at the Brea Community Center. She indicated that members of the community are welcome to join the Brea Fire, Police and Public Works Departments and learn how to stay safe during wildfires, and guest speaker Rich Snyder, Retired Sierra Madre Fire Captain/Fire Marshal, will share his experience saving his home from the Altadena wildfire and offer tips to protect homes. She directed the community to the City website for additional information. 2G. Matters from the Audience
Sean Thomas spoke about the fire hydrant and stop sign on the corner of Flower and Ash and indicated that cars often block the space. He requested the curb be painted to prevent drivers from parking in front of the hydrant. He also spoke about unattended children on the Tracks and wished the community a happy Easter, Passover and Ramadan. 2H. Response to Public Inquiries
Mayor Stewart responded to public inquiries.

3. ADMINISTRATIVE ITEMS
3A. Brea 2050: Focused General Plan Update and Brea Core Specific Plan - Draft Changes to the Land Use Designations and Land Use Map
City Planner Hwang provided a presentation and spoke about the background of the item, vision plan, and introduced the City's consultants.

Amanda Tropiano, De Novo Planning Group, spoke about land use planning considerations, land use/zoning designations, existing land use designations, examples of existing land uses for residential, commercial, industrial, and mixed use. She also spoke about other examples of density, existing general plan land use maps, parcels with proposed general plan land use change, parcels with land use designation consideration changes, existing general plan land uses with existing brea core area zoning, areas with a proposed brea core area zoning change, summary of changes, buildout factors, statistical summary, and next steps. Additionally, she provided a draft outline of the general plan, draft outline of the core area and next steps.

Council thanked staff, consultants and the General Plan Steering Committee for their work on this item. They also discussed public noticing for proposed changes; and the La Vida Hot Springs zoning information and the consideration of preserving existing zoning in that area.

Motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Hupp and seconded by Council Member Simonoff to authorize staff to move forward with the next steps, including initiation of the required environmental review. Motion passed 5-0-0-0 (Ayes: Stewart, Hupp, Marick, Simonoff, Vargas). 3B. Affordable Housing Agreement with Brea 32, LLC and Homebuyer Down-Payment Assistance Funding Request for the South Brea Townhomes Project
Senior Management Dao provided a presentation on the item and spoke about recommendations, prior affordable housing efforts, the South Brea Townhome project, prior affordable housing efforts, housing funds available, and down-payment assistance options.

Council discussed the ongoing obligations for Fund 280, previous fund balance for both Funds 270 and 280 and provisions in the purchaser affordability agreements related to buyer income levels. They also discussed the scenarios and breakdowns should grant funding be awarded or not.

Motion was made by Council Member Vargas and seconded by Council Member Marick to approve an Affordable Housing Agreement with Brea 32, LLC for the South Brea Townhomes Project (“Project”); authorize the City Manager to: a. Execute the Affordable Housing Agreement; b. Execute the following two documents with four buyers of the affordable units at South Brea Townhomes: i. Purchaser Affordability Agreement; and ii. Notice of Affordability Restrictions. c. Administratively make non-monetary revisions to the Affordable Housing Agreement and related documents as necessary or appropriate; approve a California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) Exemption Determination pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3); discuss options and provide direction to staff regarding the use of City Housing funds to provide down-payment assistance loans, in an amount not to exceed $400,000.00 to four Low-Income buyers of the affordable units at South Brea Townhomes; and amend the City’s Fiscal Year 2024-25 Operating Budget to appropriate an amount not to exceed $400,000.00 from the Affordable Housing Trust Fund (270) or Housing Successor Fund (280) for the use of down-payment assistance loans; and authorize the City Manager to authorize payment of four down-payment assistance loans in a total amount not to exceed $400,000.00. Motion passed 5-0-0-0 (Ayes: Stewart, Hupp, Marick, Simonoff, Vargas). 3C. Introduce an Ordinance Designating Fire Hazard Severity Zones Fire Marshall Pesqueira provided a presentation and spoke about the background of Fire Hazard Severity Zones, how zones are determined, map usage and application, impacts, adoption timeline and displayed the updated Brea Hazard Severity Zone Map.

Council discussed what is done with public comments received in response to the map; and AB 38 implications as it relates to home hardening standards on homes built prior to 2008 and brush clearance. They also discussed Zone Zero requirements and pending compliance deadlines and enforcement parameters on requirements. They also discussed the progress of the Helihydrant in the City.

Motion was made by Council Member Marick and seconded by Council Member Vargas to waive full reading of and introduce Ordinance No. 1260, "An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Brea designating fire hazard severity zones," formally accepting and implementing the updated California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE) Local Responsibility Area (LRA) maps for our jurisdiction. Motion passed 5-0-0-0 (Ayes: Stewart, Hupp, Marick, Simonoff, Vargas).

4. CONSENT CALENDAR
Council Member Vargas indicated he will be recusing himself from voting on item 4B [Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1256 - Zone Change No. 2024-01: Brea Plaza Shopping Center Residential Project (Brea Plaza Living)] and 4C [Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1257 - Zone Change No. 2024-02 and Ordinance No. 1258 - Development Agreement No. 2024-01 (Greenbriar Residential Development Project)].

Council Member Marick thanked staff for their work to improve parking ratios for the Greenbriar project.

Motion was made by Council Member Simonoff and seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Hupp to approve City Council Consent Items 4A - 4F, with Council Member Vargas recused on item 4B and 4C. Motion passed 5-0-0-0 (Ayes: Stewart, Hupp, Marick, Simonoff, Vargas). For Items 4B and 4C, 5-0-0-1 (Ayes: Stewart, Hupp, Marick, Simonoff. Recused: Vargas). 4A. April 1, 2025 Regular Meeting Minutes
The City Council approved the April 1, 2025 Regular Meeting Minutes. 4B. Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1256 - Zone Change No. 2024-01: Brea Plaza Shopping Center Residential Project (Brea Plaza Living)
The City Council waived full reading and adopted Ordinance No. 1256, An Ordinance of the City of Brea approving Zone Change No. 2024-01 for the Brea Plaza Shopping Center Residential Project. 4C. Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1257 - Zone Change No. 2024-02 and Ordinance No. 1258 - Development Agreement No. 2024-01 (Greenbriar Residential Development Project) The City Council waived full reading of and adopted Ordinance No. 1257, An Ordinance of the City of Brea approving Zone Change No. 2024-02 for the Greenbriar Residential Development Project, and Ordinance No. 1258, An Ordinance of the City of Brea approving Development Agreement No. 2024-01 by and between the City of Brea and Lennar Homes of California, LLC regarding the Greenbriar Residential Development.
4D. Annual Engineer's Report for Landscape and Lighting Maintenance Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7
The City Council received and approved the Annual Engineer’s Report for Landscape and Lighting Maintenance Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 and adopt Resolutions No. 2025-26 to 2025-32 to set a Public Hearing for each District on June 17, 2025, at 7:00 p.m. 4E. Monthly Report of Investments for the City of Brea for Period Ended March 31, 2025 The City Council received and filed the Monthly Report of Investments for the City of Brea for Period Ended March 31, 2025.
4F. March Outgoing Payment Log and City Disbursement Register for April 4, 2025 The City Council received and filed the March Outgoing Payment Log and City Disbursement Register for April 4, 2025.

5. CITY/SUCCESSOR AGENCY - CONSENT
Motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Hupp and seconded by Council Member Simnooff, to approve the City/Successor Agency Consent item 5A. Motion passed 5-0-0-0 (Ayes: Stewart, Hupp, Marick, Simonoff, Vargas).
5A. Monthly Report of Investments for the Successor Agency to the Brea Redevelopment Agency for Period Ended March 31, 2025
The City Council, as the Successor Agency, received and filed the Monthly Report of Investments for the Successor Agency to the Brea Redevelopment Agency for Period Ended March 31, 2025.

6. ADMINISTRATIVE ANNOUNCEMENTS
6A. City Manager
None.
6B. City Attorney
None.
6C. Council Requests
None.

7. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS
7A. Council Announcements
None.

8. ADJOURNMENT
8A. Meeting Adjournment
Mayor Stewart adjourned the General Session at 8:29 p.m.

City of Brea
City Council Regular Meeting Communication
B. Adopt a Resolution Establishing the City of Brea Master Employee Pay Schedule to Comply with CalPERS Regulations
Meeting
Tuesday, May 6, 2025, 7:00 PM
Agenda Group
CONSENT CALENDAR Item: 5B.

TO
Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
FROM
Kristin Griffith, City Manager

RECOMMENDATION
Adopt a resolution establishing the updated City of Brea Master Employee Pay Schedule confirming the pay rates/ranges as of May 6, 2025, and July 5, 2025, for all City of Brea established positions in order to comply with CalPERS regulations.

BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION
The City Council approves all salary schedules which include classification titles and pay rates/ranges at the time a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) for each bargaining unit is approved; when updates to the Employment and Benefit Policy for Unrepresented Employees are approved; or when specific wage and classification title adjustments are needed. The City has a long-standing practice of posting these approved salary schedules on the City website, www.cityofbrea.gov, and the City’s internal website (intranet), as well as having copies available in the Human Resources Division.

In addition, the City Council approves the employment agreements for the City Manager and the Executive Compensation Plan for department directors which include salaries. The City Manager and Executives’ salaries are also listed on the City’s website. The amount of monthly compensation the City Council receives is addressed in the Brea Municipal Code, Section 2.00.130, City Council Salaries, and is set in accordance with California Government Code Section 36516b.

The California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS) requires that the City Council regularly adopt a master pay schedule listing all of the pay rates/ranges for all City of Brea established positions, including the City Council, and City Manager. The City has updated and added classifications and minimum wage law salaries in addition to approving a new MOU, which have and will result in changes to the wages of certain positions.

CalPERS requires that only compensation earned as defined under Government Code Section 20636 and corresponding regulations can be reported to CalPERS and considered in calculating retirement benefits. In order to determine the amount of compensation earnable, a member’s pay rate is limited to the amount identified on a publicly available pay schedule. Per CCR Section 570.5, a pay schedule, among other things, must:

Be duly approved and adopted by the employer's governing body in accordance with requirements of applicable public meetings laws;
Identify the position title for every employee position; Show the pay rate as a single amount or multiple amounts within a range for each identified position; Indicate the time base such as hourly, daily, bi-weekly, monthly, bi-monthly, or annually; Be posted at the office of the employer or immediately accessible and available for public review from the employer during normal business hours or posted on the employer's Internet website; Indicate an effective date and date of any revisions;
Be retained by the employer and available for public inspection for not less than five years; and Not reference another document in lieu of disclosing the pay rate.

Whenever new MOU contracts are negotiated, or when wage rate/range adjustments or classification title changes are approved, a staff report amending this master pay schedule is prepared for City Council consideration. The most recent MOU that was negotiated is with the Brea Fire Association which became effective July 1, 2024.

In an effort to comply with CalPERS regulations, staff recommends that the City adopt the attached resolution establishing a City of Brea Master Employee Pay Schedule confirming the pay rates/ranges for all City of Brea established positions as of May 6, 2025, and July 5, 2025.

FISCAL IMPACT/SUMMARY
The City Council of the City of Brea is required by CalPERS to adopt a resolution establishing an updated City of Brea Master Employee Pay Schedule confirming the pay rates/ranges for all City of Brea established positions as of May 6, 2025 and July 5, 2025.

There is no fiscal impact associated with the adoption of the City of Brea Master Employee Pay Schedule.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED:

Kristin Griffith, City Manager
Prepared by: Candice Fisher, Sr. Human Resources Analyst Concurrence: Mario E. Maldonado, Human Resources Manager Attachments
Resolution No. 2025-XX - Establishing CalPERS Master Employee Salary Schedule as of May 6, 2025 and Effective July 5, 2025.pdf City of Brea Master Salary Schedule as of May 6, 2025 and Effective July 5, 2025.pdf RESO NO. 2025-XX
May 6, 2025
1 RESOLUTION NO. 2025-XX

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BREA

ESTABLISHING AND APPROVING A CITY OF BREA MASTER

EMPLOYEE PAY SCHEDULE CONFIRMING THE PAY

RATES/RANGES FOR ALL CITY OF BREA ESTABLISHED
POSITIONS.

A. RECITALS:
(i) Pursuant to the Brea City Code the City Council shall approve the salary pay rates and ranges for each classified position and may update from time to time as deemed necessary.
(ii) The California Public Employees’ Retirement Law, Section 570.5 of the California Code of Regulations Title 2, requires the City of Brea to publish Pay Rates and Ranges on the City’s Internet site and the City Council to approve the Pay Rates and Ranges in its entirety each time a modification is made. (iii) City staff recommends that the City of Brea update the City of Brea Master Employee Pay Schedule confirming the pay rates/ranges for all City of Brea established positions.
(iv) The City Council deems it to be in the best interest of the City to adopt such Recommendation.

B. RESOLUTION
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Brea resolves, finds and determines, on the basis of the facts set forth in the agenda report presented to it and any testimony received at the meeting at which this matter was considered, as follows:

RESO NO. 2025-XX
May 6, 2025
2 1. The City Council shall approve establishing a City of Brea Master Employee Pay Schedule confirming the pay rates/ranges for all City of Brea established positions as of May 6, 2025 and July 5, 2025.

APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 6th day of May, 2025.
________________________________
Blair Stewart, Mayor
ATTEST: ________________________________
Lillian Harris-Neal, City Clerk

I, Lillian Harris-Neal, City Clerk of the City of Brea, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Brea, held on the 6th day of May, 2025, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

Dated: ______________________________

______________________________
Lillian Harris-Neal, City Clerk

CITY OF BREA SALARY TABLE
Section 1: Regular Full-Time ClassificationsSection 2: Part-Time/Temporary ClassificationsSection 3: Council Members and Elected OfficialsCurrent Revision: As of 05/06/2025 and effective 07/05/2025 SECTION 1
Job
Code Job Title Unit
Effective
Date
Approx
Monthly
Min. /
Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 Step 6 Step 7 Step 8 Step 9 Step 10 Approx
Monthly
Max. /
Step 11
B49 ACCOUNTANT I BCEA 07/06/2024 $6,411.46 $6,571.75 $6,736.05 $6,904.45 $7,077.06 $7,253.98 $7,435.33 $7,621.22 $7,811.75 $8,007.05 $8,207.23A31 ACCOUNTANT II APEA 07/06/2024 $6,686.07 $6,853.22 $7,024.55 $7,200.16 $7,380.17 $7,564.67 $7,753.79 $7,947.63 $8,146.32 $8,349.98 $8,558.73B03 ACCOUNTING TECH I BCEA 07/06/2024 $4,292.07 $4,399.38 $4,509.36 $4,622.09 $4,737.65 $4,856.09 $4,977.50 $5,101.93 $5,229.48 $5,360.21 $5,494.22B02 ACCOUNTING TECH II BCEA 07/06/2024 $4,721.49 $4,839.53 $4,960.51 $5,084.52 $5,211.64 $5,341.93 $5,475.48 $5,612.37 $5,752.67 $5,896.49 $6,043.91B07 ADMIN CLERK I BCEA 07/06/2024 $3,677.95 $3,769.89 $3,864.14 $3,960.74 $4,059.76 $4,161.25 $4,265.28 $4,371.92 $4,481.21 $4,593.24 $4,708.08B06 ADMIN CLERK II BCEA 07/06/2024 $4,044.19 $4,145.30 $4,248.93 $4,355.15 $4,464.03 $4,575.63 $4,690.02 $4,807.28 $4,927.46 $5,050.65 $5,176.91E05 ADMIN SVCS DIR N/A 07/20/2024 $17,372.00 $20,846.46B05 ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT BCEA 07/06/2024 $4,471.60 $4,583.39 $4,697.97 $4,815.43 $4,935.81 $5,059.21 $5,185.69 $5,315.34 $5,448.22 $5,584.42 $5,724.03 UR2 AMBULANCE OPERATOR (NS) N/A 05/21/2024 $3,293.33 $4,215.75 A38 ASSISTANT CITY ENG APEA 07/06/2024 $10,906.51 $11,179.17 $11,458.65 $11,745.11 $12,038.74 $12,339.71 $12,648.20 $12,964.41 $13,288.52 $13,620.74 $13,961.26E01 ASSISTANT CITY MGR / DIR N/A 07/20/2024 $20,412.68 $24,495.29B46 ASSISTANT ENGINEER BCEA 07/06/2024 $7,134.44 $7,312.80 $7,495.63 $7,683.02 $7,875.09 $8,071.97 $8,273.76 $8,480.61 $8,692.62 $8,909.94 $9,132.69B10 ASSISTANT PLANNER BCEA 07/06/2024 $6,350.12 $6,508.87 $6,671.59 $6,838.38 $7,009.34 $7,184.57 $7,364.18 $7,548.28 $7,736.99 $7,930.41 $8,128.68A02 ASSOCIATE ENGINEER APEA 07/06/2024 $8,431.17 $8,641.95 $8,858.00 $9,079.45 $9,306.44 $9,539.10 $9,777.57 $10,022.01 $10,272.56 $10,529.37 $10,792.61A04 ASSOCIATE PLANNER APEA 07/06/2024 $7,291.54 $7,473.82 $7,660.67 $7,852.18 $8,048.49 $8,249.70 $8,455.95 $8,667.35 $8,884.03 $9,106.13 $9,333.78B28 ASST TO THE CITY CLERK BCEA 07/06/2024 $4,628.04 $4,743.74 $4,862.33 $4,983.89 $5,108.49 $5,236.20 $5,367.10 $5,501.28 $5,638.82 $5,779.78 $5,924.28A25 ASST TO THE CITY MGR APEA 07/06/2024 $8,983.79 $9,208.39 $9,438.59 $9,674.55 $9,916.42 $10,164.33 $10,418.44 $10,678.90 $10,945.87 $11,219.52 $11,500.01A58 BLDG & FAC ADMIN APEA 07/06/2024 $7,857.74 $8,054.18 $8,255.53 $8,461.92 $8,673.48 $8,890.31 $9,112.56 $9,340.38 $9,573.89 $9,813.24 $10,058.58 M01 BLDG & SAFETY MGR MGMT NS 07/06/2024 $11,940.78 $12,239.29 $12,545.28 $12,858.91 $13,180.39 $13,509.89 $13,847.64 $14,193.83 $14,548.68 $14,912.39 $15,285.20 B04 BUILDING MAINT TECH BCEA 07/06/2024 $5,255.27 $5,386.65 $5,521.32 $5,659.35 $5,800.83 $5,945.85 $6,094.50 $6,246.86 $6,403.03 $6,563.10 $6,727.18 M23 BUILDING OFFICIAL MGMT NS 01/21/2025 $9,810.86 $10,056.14 $10,307.54 $10,565.23 $10,829.36 $11,100.09 $11,377.60 $11,662.04 $11,953.59 $12,252.44 $12,558.75 B37 BUSINESS OUTREACH SP BCEA 07/06/2024 $5,098.93 $5,226.41 $5,357.06 $5,490.99 $5,628.27 $5,768.98 $5,913.20 $6,061.03 $6,212.55 $6,367.86 $6,527.06B69 BUYER BCEA 07/06/2024 $5,382.41 $5,516.97 $5,654.90 $5,796.26 $5,941.17 $6,089.70 $6,241.94 $6,397.99 $6,557.94 $6,721.88 $6,889.93 M16 CITY CLERK MGMT NS 07/06/2024 $11,322.17 $11,605.23 $11,895.36 $12,192.74 $12,497.56 $12,810.00 $13,130.24 $13,458.51 $13,794.97 $14,139.84 $14,493.34 B66 CITY CLERK SPECIALIST BCEA 07/06/2024 $4,044.19 $4,145.30 $4,248.93 $4,355.15 $4,464.03 $4,575.63 $4,690.02 $4,807.28 $4,927.46 $5,050.65 $5,176.91 M02 CITY ENGINEER MGMT NS 07/06/2024 $12,429.21 $12,739.94 $13,058.43 $13,384.89 $13,719.52 $14,062.51 $14,414.07 $14,774.42 $15,143.78 $15,522.38 $15,910.44 3 CITY MANAGER N/A 03/29/2025 $28,424.25
M03 CITY PLANNER MGMT NS 07/06/2024 $11,906.59 $12,204.26 $12,509.37 $12,822.11 $13,142.67 $13,471.24 $13,808.02 $14,153.22 $14,507.05 $14,869.72 $15,241.47 N10 CIVILIAN INVESTIGATOR POLICE 01/05/2025 $6,352.55 $6,511.14 $6,674.62 $6,842.15 $7,012.94 $7,187.79 $7,367.53 $7,552.15 $7,740.83 $7,934.39 $8,132.83 B24 CODE ENFORCE OFFICER BCEA 07/06/2024 $6,365.43 $6,524.57 $6,687.68 $6,854.87 $7,026.24 $7,201.89 $7,381.94 $7,566.48 $7,755.64 $7,949.53 $8,148.27B13 COMBO INSPECTOR I BCEA 07/06/2024 $5,402.75 $5,537.82 $5,676.26 $5,818.16 $5,963.62 $6,112.71 $6,265.53 $6,422.17 $6,582.73 $6,747.30 $6,915.99B12 COMBO INSPECTOR II BCEA 07/06/2024 $6,365.43 $6,524.57 $6,687.68 $6,854.87 $7,026.24 $7,201.89 $7,381.94 $7,566.48 $7,755.64 $7,949.53 $8,148.27 M04 COMM & MKTG MANAGER MGMT NS 07/06/2024 $10,220.00 $10,475.50 $10,737.39 $11,005.83 $11,280.97 $11,563.00 $11,852.08 $12,148.38 $12,452.08 $12,763.39 $13,082.47 A18 COMM & MKTNG ANALYST APEA 07/06/2024 $7,812.39 $8,007.69 $8,207.89 $8,413.08 $8,623.41 $8,839.00 $9,059.97 $9,286.47 $9,518.63 $9,756.59 $10,000.51 M10 COMM DEV MANAGER MGMT NS 07/06/2024 $10,582.45 $10,847.01 $11,118.19 $11,396.15 $11,681.06 $11,973.08 $12,272.41 $12,579.22 $12,893.69 $13,216.03 $13,546.44 A08 COMM SV SPECIALIST I APEA 07/06/2024 $5,067.33 $5,194.01 $5,323.86 $5,456.96 $5,593.38 $5,733.22 $5,876.55 $6,023.46 $6,174.05 $6,328.40 $6,486.61

CITY OF BREA
SALARY TABLE AS OF MAY 6, 2025 - REGULAR FULL-TIME CLASSIFICATIONS Job
Code Job Title Unit
Effective
Date
Approx
Monthly
Min. /
Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 Step 6 Step 7 Step 8 Step 9 Step 10 Approx
Monthly
Max. /
Step 11

CITY OF BREA
SALARY TABLE AS OF MAY 6, 2025 - REGULAR FULL-TIME CLASSIFICATIONS A07 COMM SV SPECIALST II APEA 07/06/2024 $5,721.52 $5,864.55 $6,011.16 $6,161.44 $6,315.48 $6,473.37 $6,635.20 $6,801.08 $6,971.10 $7,145.38 $7,324.01 M05 COMM SVC MANAGER MGMT NS 07/06/2024 $9,929.40 $10,177.63 $10,432.07 $10,692.87 $10,960.20 $11,234.20 $11,515.05 $11,802.92 $12,098.00 $12,400.45 $12,710.46 A06 COMM SVS SUPERVISOR APEA 07/06/2024 $7,601.61 $7,791.65 $7,986.45 $8,186.11 $8,390.76 $8,600.53 $8,815.54 $9,035.93 $9,261.83 $9,493.38 $9,730.71B60 COMM. DEV SPEC. BCEA 07/06/2024 $4,695.96 $4,813.36 $4,933.69 $5,057.03 $5,183.45 $5,313.04 $5,445.87 $5,582.01 $5,721.57 $5,864.60 $6,011.21 N01 COMM. SUPERVISOR POLICE 01/05/2025 $7,942.77 $8,141.06 $8,345.45 $8,554.93 $8,768.47 $8,987.10 $9,211.83 $9,442.65 $9,678.57 $9,920.58 $10,168.70 E07 COMMUNITY DEV DIR N/A 07/20/2024 $16,252.19 $19,502.68E03 COMMUNITY SVCS DIR N/A 07/20/2024 $15,408.52 $18,490.28 N14 CRIME ANALYST POLICE 01/05/2025 $7,076.15 $7,252.80 $7,434.89 $7,621.51 $7,811.76 $8,006.53 $8,206.74 $8,412.38 $8,622.56 $8,838.17 $9,059.21N11 CRIME SCENE INVSTGTR POLICE 01/05/2025 $6,837.58 $7,008.27 $7,184.22 $7,364.55 $7,548.38 $7,736.59 $7,930.05 $8,128.76 $8,331.84 $8,540.18 $8,753.78 A11 DEPUTY CITY CLERK/REC SUP APEA 07/06/2024 $7,001.40 $7,176.44 $7,355.86 $7,539.75 $7,728.24 $7,921.45 $8,119.49 $8,322.48 $8,530.54 $8,743.80 $8,962.40E09 DEPUTY CITY MANAGER / DIR N/A 07/20/2024 $19,457.00 $23,348.00 M21 DEPUTY DIR OF ADMIN SVS MGMT NS 07/06/2024 $13,842.25 $14,188.30 $14,543.01 $14,906.58 $15,279.25 $15,661.23 $16,052.76 $16,454.08 $16,865.43 $17,287.07 $17,719.24M24 DEPUTY DIR OF COMM DEV MGMT NS 01/21/2025 $12,950.97 $13,274.74 $13,606.61 $13,946.78 $14,295.44 $14,652.83 $15,019.15 $15,394.63 $15,779.50 $16,173.98 $16,578.33M22 DEPUTY DIR OF COMM SVS MGMT NS 07/06/2024 $12,277.91 $12,584.85 $12,899.47 $13,221.96 $13,552.51 $13,891.32 $14,238.61 $14,594.57 $14,959.44 $15,333.42 $15,716.76M25 DEPUTY DIR OF PUBLIC WORKS MGMT NS 01/21/2025 $13,099.32 $13,426.80 $13,762.47 $14,106.54 $14,459.20 $14,820.68 $15,191.20 $15,570.14 $15,960.25 $16,359.26 $16,768.24 A63 DEPUTY FIRE MARSHAL APEA 07/06/2024 $7,677.17 $7,869.10 $8,065.83 $8,267.47 $8,474.16 $8,686.01 $8,903.17 $9,125.75 $9,353.89 $9,587.75 $9,827.44B27 DUPLICATING TECH I BCEA 07/06/2024 $3,894.57 $3,991.94 $4,091.74 $4,194.03 $4,298.88 $4,406.35 $4,516.51 $4,629.42 $4,745.15 $4,863.77 $4,985.37B26 DUPLICATING TECH II BCEA 07/06/2024 $4,865.94 $4,987.59 $5,112.28 $5,240.08 $5,371.09 $5,505.37 $5,643.01 $5,784.09 $5,928.69 $6,076.91 $6,228.83B56 ECON DEV ANALYST I BCEA 07/06/2024 $6,282.41 $6,439.48 $6,600.47 $6,765.48 $6,934.62 $7,107.99 $7,285.68 $7,467.83 $7,654.53 $7,845.89 $8,042.03A21 ECON DEV ANALYST II APEA 07/06/2024 $6,966.80 $7,140.97 $7,319.49 $7,502.48 $7,690.04 $7,882.29 $8,079.35 $8,281.33 $8,488.36 $8,700.58 $8,918.09A19 EMERGENCY PREP COORD APEA 07/06/2024 $7,811.40 $8,006.68 $8,206.86 $8,412.03 $8,622.34 $8,837.89 $9,058.84 $9,285.31 $9,517.44 $9,755.38 $9,999.26 M18 EMS MANAGER MGMT NS 07/06/2024 $8,661.84 $8,878.38 $9,100.34 $9,327.85 $9,561.04 $9,800.06 $10,045.07 $10,296.19 $10,553.60 $10,817.44 $11,087.88 B31 ENGINEERING TECH I BCEA 07/06/2024 $4,854.37 $4,975.72 $5,100.12 $5,227.62 $5,358.31 $5,492.27 $5,629.58 $5,770.32 $5,914.58 $6,062.45 $6,214.01B30 ENGINEERING TECH II BCEA 07/06/2024 $5,827.04 $5,972.71 $6,122.03 $6,275.08 $6,431.96 $6,592.76 $6,757.58 $6,926.52 $7,099.69 $7,277.18 $7,459.11B09 ENVIR SERVS INSPECT BCEA 07/06/2024 $6,414.58 $6,574.94 $6,739.32 $6,907.81 $7,080.51 $7,257.52 $7,438.96 $7,624.94 $7,815.56 $8,010.95 $8,211.22A20 ENVIRON SERVS COOR APEA 07/06/2024 $8,438.65 $8,649.61 $8,865.85 $9,087.49 $9,314.68 $9,547.54 $9,786.24 $10,030.89 $10,281.67 $10,538.71 $10,802.18A12 EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT APEA 07/06/2024 $5,532.35 $5,670.66 $5,812.42 $5,957.74 $6,106.69 $6,259.35 $6,415.84 $6,576.23 $6,740.64 $6,909.16 $7,081.89 M06 FINANCIAL SVC MGR MGMT NS 07/06/2024 $10,936.20 $11,209.60 $11,489.85 $11,777.09 $12,071.52 $12,373.31 $12,682.64 $12,999.70 $13,324.70 $13,657.82 $13,999.27 FM1 FIRE BATTALION CHIEF FIRE MGMT 01/05/2025 $13,057.98 $13,383.97 $13,719.99 $14,064.37 $14,415.44 $14,774.86 $15,144.32 $15,523.80 $15,911.65 $16,309.52 $16,717.42 F20 FIRE CAPTAIN FIRE 07/06/2024 $9,839.44 $10,085.08 $10,338.28 $10,597.78 $10,862.31 $11,133.15 $11,411.54 $11,697.49 $11,989.73 $12,289.54 $12,596.91 ES1 FIRE CHIEF N/A 07/20/2024 $18,849.39 $22,619.33
FM_3 FIRE DEPUTY CHIEF FIRE MGMT 01/21/2025 $15,800.16 $16,195.16 $16,600.04 $17,015.04 $17,440.42 $17,876.43 $18,323.34 $18,781.42 $19,250.96 $19,732.23 $20,228.06 FM2 FIRE DIVISION CHIEF FIRE MGMT 01/21/2025 $14,363.78 $14,722.87 $15,090.95 $15,468.22 $15,854.92 $16,251.30 $16,657.58 $17,076.18 $17,502.81 $17,940.47 $18,389.16 F05 FIRE ENGINEER FIRE 07/06/2024 $8,380.53 $8,589.75 $8,805.41 $9,026.43 $9,251.74 $9,482.42 $9,719.53 $9,963.08 $10,212.00 $10,467.35 $10,729.14 M20 FIRE MARSHAL - NON SWORN MGMT NS 07/06/2024 $9,012.90 $9,238.22 $9,469.18 $9,705.91 $9,948.55 $10,197.27 $10,452.20 $10,713.50 $10,981.35 $11,255.88 $11,537.28 B34 FIRE PREV SPEC I BCEA 07/06/2024 $5,990.81 $6,140.58 $6,294.09 $6,451.45 $6,612.73 $6,778.05 $6,947.50 $7,121.19 $7,299.22 $7,481.70 $7,668.74B33 FIRE PREV SPEC II BCEA 07/06/2024 $6,811.02 $6,981.30 $7,155.83 $7,334.73 $7,518.10 $7,706.06 $7,898.71 $8,096.18 $8,298.59 $8,506.05 $8,718.70 Job
Code Job Title Unit
Effective
Date
Approx
Monthly
Min. /
Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 Step 6 Step 7 Step 8 Step 9 Step 10 Approx
Monthly
Max. /
Step 11

CITY OF BREA
SALARY TABLE AS OF MAY 6, 2025 - REGULAR FULL-TIME CLASSIFICATIONS A50 FIRE PROTECT ANALYST APEA 07/06/2024 $6,979.25 $7,153.73 $7,332.57 $7,515.89 $7,703.78 $7,896.38 $8,093.79 $8,296.14 $8,503.54 $8,716.13 $8,934.04 F01 FIREFIGHTER FIRE 07/06/2024 $7,458.78 $7,644.99 $7,836.93 $8,033.64 $8,234.17 $8,439.47 $8,650.51 $8,867.28 $9,088.81 $9,316.08 $9,549.08 UR1 FIREFIGHTER TRAINEE (NS) N/A 07/09/2022 $6,168.69
A46 FISCAL SPECIALIST APEA 07/06/2024 $6,128.89 $6,282.11 $6,439.17 $6,600.15 $6,765.15 $6,934.28 $7,107.64 $7,285.33 $7,467.47 $7,654.16 $7,845.51 A14 FLEET SUPERVISOR APEA 07/06/2024 $7,453.66 $7,639.99 $7,831.00 $8,026.77 $8,227.43 $8,433.13 $8,643.96 $8,860.05 $9,081.55 $9,308.59 $9,541.31A44 GIS ANALYST APEA 07/06/2024 $7,605.34 $7,795.47 $7,990.36 $8,190.12 $8,394.87 $8,604.74 $8,819.86 $9,040.35 $9,266.36 $9,498.02 $9,735.47B36 HEAVY EQUIP MECH I BCEA 07/06/2024 $4,891.43 $5,013.71 $5,139.05 $5,267.52 $5,399.21 $5,534.19 $5,672.55 $5,814.36 $5,959.72 $6,108.71 $6,261.43B35 HEAVY EQUIP MECH II BCEA 07/06/2024 $5,381.44 $5,515.98 $5,653.88 $5,795.22 $5,940.10 $6,088.61 $6,240.82 $6,396.85 $6,556.76 $6,720.68 $6,888.69B59 HELP DESK TECH BCEA 07/06/2024 $5,249.63 $5,380.87 $5,515.39 $5,653.28 $5,794.62 $5,939.49 $6,087.97 $6,240.17 $6,396.18 $6,556.08 $6,719.99A54 HR ANALYST I APEA 07/06/2024 $7,442.91 $7,628.98 $7,819.71 $8,015.20 $8,215.58 $8,420.97 $8,631.49 $8,847.28 $9,068.46 $9,295.17 $9,527.55A27 HR ANALYST II APEA 07/06/2024 $8,183.26 $8,387.84 $8,597.53 $8,812.47 $9,032.79 $9,258.61 $9,490.07 $9,727.32 $9,970.50 $10,219.76 $10,475.25A28 HR TECHNICIAN APEA 07/06/2024 $5,957.21 $6,106.14 $6,258.80 $6,415.26 $6,575.64 $6,740.03 $6,908.53 $7,081.24 $7,258.27 $7,439.72 $7,625.72B08 HSG REHAB SPECIALIST BCEA 07/06/2024 $6,209.63 $6,364.88 $6,524.00 $6,687.10 $6,854.28 $7,025.64 $7,201.29 $7,381.32 $7,565.86 $7,755.00 $7,948.88 M15 HUMAN RESOURES MGR MGMT NS 07/06/2024 $11,742.31 $12,035.87 $12,336.76 $12,645.19 $12,961.31 $13,285.35 $13,617.49 $13,957.92 $14,306.87 $14,664.53 $15,031.15 A24 INFO TECH SUPERVISOR APEA 07/06/2024 $9,163.14 $9,392.22 $9,627.02 $9,867.70 $10,114.39 $10,367.25 $10,626.43 $10,892.09 $11,164.39 $11,443.50 $11,729.59 M08 INFO TECHNO MANAGER MGMT NS 07/06/2024 $11,750.26 $12,044.02 $12,345.12 $12,653.75 $12,970.09 $13,294.34 $13,626.70 $13,967.38 $14,316.56 $14,674.47 $15,041.34 A35 IT ENTRPRS ACT ADMIN APEA 07/06/2024 $9,051.07 $9,277.35 $9,509.29 $9,747.02 $9,990.70 $10,240.47 $10,496.48 $10,758.90 $11,027.87 $11,303.57 $11,586.16A40 IT SPECIALIST I APEA 07/06/2024 $6,874.94 $7,046.82 $7,222.99 $7,403.57 $7,588.66 $7,778.38 $7,972.84 $8,172.16 $8,376.47 $8,585.87 $8,800.53A41 IT SPECIALIST II APEA 07/06/2024 $7,497.17 $7,684.60 $7,876.72 $8,073.63 $8,275.47 $8,482.36 $8,694.42 $8,911.78 $9,134.58 $9,362.94 $9,597.02 N07 JAILER POLICE 01/05/2025 $5,379.97 $5,514.28 $5,652.72 $5,794.61 $5,939.25 $6,087.33 $6,239.55 $6,395.90 $6,555.70 $6,719.63 $6,887.68 B11 JR PLANS CHECKER BCEA 07/06/2024 $6,365.43 $6,524.57 $6,687.68 $6,854.87 $7,026.24 $7,201.89 $7,381.94 $7,566.48 $7,755.64 $7,949.53 $8,148.27B15 LS MAINT CTRCT ADMIN BCEA 07/06/2024 $5,794.64 $5,939.51 $6,087.99 $6,240.19 $6,396.20 $6,556.10 $6,720.01 $6,888.01 $7,060.21 $7,236.71 $7,417.63 M11 MAINT SRVS SUPERINT MGMT NS 07/06/2024 $9,289.97 $9,522.22 $9,760.27 $10,004.28 $10,254.38 $10,510.74 $10,773.51 $11,042.85 $11,318.92 $11,601.89 $11,891.94 B23 MAINT SVC WORKER I BCEA 07/06/2024 $4,423.87 $4,534.47 $4,647.83 $4,764.03 $4,883.13 $5,005.20 $5,130.34 $5,258.59 $5,390.06 $5,524.82 $5,662.94B22 MAINT SVC WORKER II BCEA 07/06/2024 $4,645.27 $4,761.40 $4,880.44 $5,002.45 $5,127.52 $5,255.70 $5,387.10 $5,521.77 $5,659.81 $5,801.30 $5,946.33A34 MANAGEMENT ANALYST I APEA 07/06/2024 $6,309.31 $6,467.04 $6,628.72 $6,794.44 $6,964.29 $7,138.41 $7,316.86 $7,499.78 $7,687.27 $7,879.45 $8,076.44A17 MANAGEMENT ANALYST II APEA 07/06/2024 $7,099.66 $7,277.15 $7,459.08 $7,645.56 $7,836.69 $8,032.61 $8,233.43 $8,439.26 $8,650.25 $8,866.51 $9,088.17B70 MANAGEMENT ASSISTANT BCEA 01/21/2025 $5,531.12 $5,669.40 $5,811.13 $5,956.41 $6,105.32 $6,257.96 $6,414.40 $6,574.76 $6,739.13 $6,907.61 $7,080.30B43 MEDIA SVC SPEC I BCEA 07/06/2024 $5,305.91 $5,438.55 $5,574.51 $5,713.87 $5,856.72 $6,003.14 $6,153.22 $6,307.05 $6,464.72 $6,626.34 $6,792.00A26 MEDIA SVS SPEC II APEA 07/06/2024 $5,821.50 $5,967.04 $6,116.21 $6,269.12 $6,425.84 $6,586.49 $6,751.16 $6,919.93 $7,092.93 $7,270.26 $7,452.01 N08 PARKING CTRL OFFICER POLICE 01/05/2025 $4,873.10 $4,994.76 $5,120.16 $5,248.68 $5,379.69 $5,513.83 $5,651.70 $5,793.32 $5,938.06 $6,086.54 $6,238.77 A65 PAYROLL SUPERVISOR APEA 01/21/2025 $6,128.89 $6,282.11 $6,439.17 $6,600.15 $6,765.15 $6,934.28 $7,107.64 $7,285.33 $7,467.47 $7,654.16 $7,845.51B71 PAYROLL TECHNICIAN BCEA 01/21/2025 $5,099.21 $5,226.69 $5,357.36 $5,491.29 $5,628.57 $5,769.29 $5,913.52 $6,061.36 $6,212.89 $6,368.21 $6,527.42 B62 PERMIT TECHNICIAN BCEA 07/06/2024 $4,631.74 $4,747.53 $4,866.21 $4,987.87 $5,112.56 $5,240.37 $5,371.38 $5,505.66 $5,643.30 $5,784.38 $5,928.99 A29 PLAN CHECKER APEA 07/06/2024 $7,806.04 $8,001.19 $8,201.22 $8,406.25 $8,616.41 $8,831.83 $9,052.62 $9,278.93 $9,510.91 $9,748.68 $9,992.40B64 PLANNING TECHNICIAN BCEA 07/06/2024 $4,902.71 $5,025.28 $5,150.91 $5,279.68 $5,411.67 $5,546.96 $5,685.64 $5,827.78 $5,973.48 $6,122.81 $6,275.88 PM1 POLICE CAPTAIN POLICE MGMT 01/05/2025 $15,316.14 $15,698.51 $16,092.63 $16,496.57 $16,908.35 $17,329.93 $17,763.27 $18,208.39 $18,663.30 $19,129.98 $19,608.43 Job
Code Job Title Unit
Effective
Date
Approx
Monthly
Min. /
Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 Step 6 Step 7 Step 8 Step 9 Step 10 Approx
Monthly
Max. /
Step 11

CITY OF BREA
SALARY TABLE AS OF MAY 6, 2025 - REGULAR FULL-TIME CLASSIFICATIONS ES2 POLICE CHIEF N/A 07/20/2024 $20,412.68 $24,495.29
B65 POLICE COMM. OUTRCH COOR. BCEA 07/06/2024 $5,438.57 $5,574.53 $5,713.88 $5,856.73 $6,003.15 $6,153.23 $6,307.06 $6,464.73 $6,626.35 $6,792.01 $6,961.80 PM2 POLICE LT. POLICE MGMT 01/05/2025 $13,121.91 $13,449.50 $13,787.16 $14,133.23 $14,486.01 $14,847.20 $15,218.46 $15,599.81 $15,989.55 $16,389.37 $16,799.27 N16 POLICE OFCR RECRUIT POLICE 01/05/2025 $7,626.13
P02 POLICE OFFICER POLICE 01/05/2025 $8,129.21 $8,332.16 $8,541.35 $8,755.74 $8,974.29 $9,198.05 $9,428.06 $9,664.30 $9,905.76 $10,153.45 $10,407.39 A30 POLICE REC & P&E SPVR APEA 07/06/2024 $8,166.31 $8,370.47 $8,579.73 $8,794.23 $9,014.08 $9,239.43 $9,470.42 $9,707.18 $9,949.86 $10,198.61 $10,453.57B19 POLICE RECORDS CLERK BCEA 07/06/2024 $4,406.96 $4,517.14 $4,630.07 $4,745.82 $4,864.46 $4,986.08 $5,110.73 $5,238.50 $5,369.46 $5,503.70 $5,641.30B18 POLICE RECORDS TECH BCEA 07/06/2024 $4,628.04 $4,743.74 $4,862.33 $4,983.89 $5,108.49 $5,236.20 $5,367.10 $5,501.28 $5,638.82 $5,779.78 $5,924.28P20 POLICE SGT POLICE 01/05/2025 $10,506.32 $10,768.61 $11,038.97 $11,316.05 $11,598.51 $11,887.70 $12,184.96 $12,490.29 $12,802.35 $13,122.47 $13,450.67 N05 POLICE SVS. OFFICER POLICE 01/05/2025 $5,360.76 $5,494.59 $5,632.54 $5,773.92 $5,918.04 $6,065.60 $6,217.27 $6,373.06 $6,532.29 $6,695.63 $6,863.09 A49 POLICE TRAIN COORDIN APEA 07/06/2024 $5,531.12 $5,669.40 $5,811.14 $5,956.42 $6,105.33 $6,257.96 $6,414.41 $6,574.77 $6,739.14 $6,907.61 $7,080.30A66 PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT APEA 01/21/2025 $8,803.64 $9,023.73 $9,249.33 $9,480.56 $9,717.57 $9,960.51 $10,209.52 $10,464.76 $10,726.38 $10,994.54 $11,269.41A39 PRINCIPAL CIVIL ENG APEA 07/06/2024 $10,145.57 $10,399.21 $10,659.19 $10,925.67 $11,198.82 $11,478.79 $11,765.76 $12,059.91 $12,361.41 $12,670.44 $12,987.21A67 PRINCIPAL HR ANALYST APEA 01/21/2025 $10,124.19 $10,377.29 $10,636.72 $10,902.64 $11,175.21 $11,454.59 $11,740.95 $12,034.48 $12,335.34 $12,643.72 $12,959.82A68 PRINCIPAL MGMT ANALYST APEA 01/21/2025 $8,803.64 $9,023.73 $9,249.33 $9,480.56 $9,717.57 $9,960.51 $10,209.52 $10,464.76 $10,726.38 $10,994.54 $11,269.41A69 PRINCIPAL PLANNER APEA 01/21/2025 $9,804.72 $10,049.84 $10,301.08 $10,558.61 $10,822.57 $11,093.14 $11,370.47 $11,654.73 $11,946.10 $12,244.75 $12,550.87A61 PROCURE & CONTR ADMIN APEA 07/06/2024 $7,115.57 $7,293.46 $7,475.80 $7,662.70 $7,854.27 $8,050.62 $8,251.89 $8,458.19 $8,669.64 $8,886.39 $9,108.55 N06 PROP & EVIDENCE TECH POLICE 01/05/2025 $5,377.04 $5,511.28 $5,649.64 $5,791.45 $5,936.01 $6,084.02 $6,236.16 $6,392.42 $6,552.13 $6,715.97 $6,883.93N04 PUBLIC SAFETY DISPATCHER I POLICE 01/05/2025 $5,458.61 $5,594.89 $5,735.35 $5,879.31 $6,026.07 $6,176.32 $6,330.76 $6,489.40 $6,651.53 $6,817.85 $6,988.37N03 PUBLIC SAFETY DISPATCHER II POLICE 01/05/2025 $6,005.69 $6,155.62 $6,310.16 $6,468.55 $6,630.02 $6,795.33 $6,965.25 $7,139.78 $7,318.16 $7,501.15 $7,688.76 B20 PUBLIC WORKS CREW LDR BCEA 01/21/2025 $5,517.69 $5,655.63 $5,797.02 $5,941.94 $6,090.48 $6,242.75 $6,398.81 $6,558.78 $6,722.75 $6,890.81 $7,063.08E04 PUBLIC WORKS DIR N/A 07/20/2024 $16,438.99 $19,726.84 M26 PUBLIC WORKS MANAGER MGMT NS 01/21/2025 $10,218.97 $10,474.44 $10,736.30 $11,004.71 $11,279.83 $11,561.83 $11,850.87 $12,147.14 $12,450.82 $12,762.09 $13,081.14 A15 PUBLIC WORKS SPRVSR APEA 01/21/2025 $7,080.99 $7,258.02 $7,439.47 $7,625.46 $7,816.09 $8,011.49 $8,211.78 $8,417.08 $8,627.51 $8,843.20 $9,064.28 M27 PUBLIC WORKS UTILIT SUPERINT MGMT NS 01/21/2025 $11,240.87 $11,521.89 $11,809.93 $12,105.18 $12,407.81 $12,718.01 $13,035.96 $13,361.86 $13,695.90 $14,038.30 $14,389.26 A70 PUBLIC WORKS UTLTY SPRVSR APEA 01/21/2025 $8,145.43 $8,349.06 $8,557.79 $8,771.73 $8,991.03 $9,215.80 $9,446.20 $9,682.35 $9,924.41 $10,172.52 $10,426.83 M09 PURCHASING AGENT MGMT NS 07/06/2024 $9,929.40 $10,177.63 $10,432.07 $10,692.87 $10,960.20 $11,234.20 $11,515.05 $11,802.92 $12,098.00 $12,400.45 $12,710.46 A52 RADIO FREQUENCY SP APEA 07/06/2024 $8,244.46 $8,450.57 $8,661.84 $8,878.38 $9,100.34 $9,327.85 $9,561.04 $9,800.06 $10,045.07 $10,296.19 $10,553.60A47 REDEV PROJECT MGR APEA 07/06/2024 $7,845.01 $8,041.13 $8,242.15 $8,448.20 $8,659.41 $8,875.89 $9,097.78 $9,325.23 $9,558.36 $9,797.32 $10,042.25B58 REPROGRAPHICS SPEC. BCEA 07/06/2024 $5,827.04 $5,972.71 $6,122.03 $6,275.08 $6,431.96 $6,592.76 $6,757.58 $6,926.52 $7,099.69 $7,277.18 $7,459.11 M13 REVENUE & BUDGET MGR MGMT NS 07/06/2024 $10,244.96 $10,501.08 $10,763.60 $11,032.69 $11,308.50 $11,591.22 $11,881.00 $12,178.02 $12,482.47 $12,794.53 $13,114.39 A48 SOFTWARE DEVELOPER I APEA 07/06/2024 $6,816.11 $6,986.51 $7,161.18 $7,340.21 $7,523.72 $7,711.81 $7,904.60 $8,102.22 $8,304.78 $8,512.39 $8,725.20A42 SOFTWAREDEVELOPER II APEA 07/06/2024 $7,497.17 $7,684.60 $7,876.72 $8,073.63 $8,275.47 $8,482.36 $8,694.42 $8,911.78 $9,134.58 $9,362.94 $9,597.02A23 SR BUYER APEA 07/06/2024 $5,929.46 $6,077.70 $6,229.65 $6,385.39 $6,545.03 $6,708.66 $6,876.37 $7,048.28 $7,224.48 $7,405.09 $7,590.22A53 SR. ACCOUNTANT APEA 07/06/2024 $7,386.42 $7,571.08 $7,760.35 $7,954.36 $8,153.22 $8,357.05 $8,565.97 $8,780.12 $8,999.63 $9,224.62 $9,455.24A59 SR. BLDG INSPECTOR APEA 07/06/2024 $7,267.31 $7,448.99 $7,635.22 $7,826.09 $8,021.74 $8,222.28 $8,427.84 $8,638.54 $8,854.50 $9,075.87 $9,302.76A05 SR. COMM SVS SPRVSR APEA 07/06/2024 $8,739.94 $8,958.44 $9,182.40 $9,411.96 $9,647.26 $9,888.44 $10,135.65 $10,389.04 $10,648.77 $10,914.99 $11,187.87 Job
Code Job Title Unit
Effective
Date
Approx
Monthly
Min. /
Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 Step 6 Step 7 Step 8 Step 9 Step 10 Approx
Monthly
Max. /
Step 11

CITY OF BREA
SALARY TABLE AS OF MAY 6, 2025 - REGULAR FULL-TIME CLASSIFICATIONS A09 SR. EX ASST/CITY MGR APEA 07/06/2024 $7,179.02 $7,358.50 $7,542.45 $7,731.02 $7,924.30 $8,122.41 $8,325.47 $8,533.60 $8,746.95 $8,965.61 $9,189.75B41 SR. FIRE PREV SPEC BCEA 07/06/2024 $7,492.13 $7,679.43 $7,871.41 $8,068.20 $8,269.90 $8,476.65 $8,688.57 $8,905.78 $9,128.43 $9,356.63 $9,590.55A62 SR. FISCAL ANALYST APEA 07/06/2024 $8,592.53 $8,807.35 $9,027.53 $9,253.21 $9,484.54 $9,721.66 $9,964.69 $10,213.81 $10,469.16 $10,730.89 $10,999.16A45 SR. GIS ANALYST APEA 07/06/2024 $8,366.43 $8,575.60 $8,789.99 $9,009.74 $9,234.98 $9,465.85 $9,702.50 $9,945.06 $10,193.69 $10,448.54 $10,709.76A43 SR. HR ANALYST APEA 07/06/2024 $9,001.92 $9,226.97 $9,457.65 $9,694.08 $9,936.43 $10,184.85 $10,439.47 $10,700.46 $10,967.98 $11,242.17 $11,523.23A51 SR. IT SPECIALIST APEA 07/06/2024 $7,872.74 $8,069.57 $8,271.30 $8,478.08 $8,690.04 $8,907.29 $9,129.97 $9,358.22 $9,592.17 $9,831.98 $10,077.78A37 SR. MEDIA SVS SPEC-AV APEA 07/06/2024 $7,263.94 $7,445.54 $7,631.68 $7,822.48 $8,018.05 $8,218.49 $8,423.96 $8,634.56 $8,850.43 $9,071.69 $9,298.49A16 SR. MGMNT ANALYST APEA 07/06/2024 $7,811.40 $8,006.68 $8,206.86 $8,412.03 $8,622.34 $8,837.89 $9,058.84 $9,285.31 $9,517.44 $9,755.38 $9,999.26A03 SR. PLANNER APEA 07/06/2024 $8,715.30 $8,933.19 $9,156.53 $9,385.44 $9,620.08 $9,860.58 $10,107.09 $10,359.77 $10,618.76 $10,884.24 $11,156.34B17 SR. POL REC'DS TECH BCEA 07/06/2024 $5,089.17 $5,216.39 $5,346.80 $5,480.48 $5,617.49 $5,757.93 $5,901.88 $6,049.43 $6,200.66 $6,355.68 $6,514.57 N02 SR. PS DISPATCHER POLICE 01/05/2025 $6,606.23 $6,771.15 $6,941.15 $7,115.37 $7,292.98 $7,474.82 $7,661.73 $7,853.72 $8,049.94 $8,251.23 $8,457.59 B45 ST SWEEPER OPERATOR BCEA 07/06/2024 $4,982.67 $5,107.23 $5,234.91 $5,365.79 $5,499.93 $5,637.43 $5,778.36 $5,922.82 $6,070.89 $6,222.66 $6,378.23A71 UTILITY BILLING SPRVSR APEA 01/21/2025 $6,128.89 $6,282.11 $6,439.17 $6,600.15 $6,765.15 $6,934.28 $7,107.64 $7,285.33 $7,467.47 $7,654.16 $7,845.51B52 WATER DIST CREW LDR BCEA 07/06/2024 $6,425.73 $6,586.37 $6,751.02 $6,919.80 $7,092.80 $7,270.12 $7,451.88 $7,638.17 $7,829.12 $8,024.85 $8,225.48B54 WATER DIST OPER I BCEA 07/06/2024 $4,857.88 $4,979.33 $5,103.82 $5,231.41 $5,362.20 $5,496.26 $5,633.66 $5,774.50 $5,918.86 $6,066.83 $6,218.50B53 WATER DIST OPER II BCEA 07/06/2024 $5,182.02 $5,311.58 $5,444.36 $5,580.47 $5,719.98 $5,862.98 $6,009.56 $6,159.79 $6,313.79 $6,471.63 $6,633.43 M12 WATER DIST SUPERINT MGMT NS 07/06/2024 $10,218.14 $10,473.59 $10,735.42 $11,003.81 $11,278.90 $11,560.87 $11,849.89 $12,146.14 $12,449.80 $12,761.04 $13,080.06 A36 WATER DIST SUPERVISOR APEA 07/06/2024 $7,757.55 $7,951.49 $8,150.28 $8,354.03 $8,562.88 $8,776.96 $8,996.38 $9,221.29 $9,451.83 $9,688.12 $9,930.32 Job
Code Job Title Unit
Effective
Date
Approx
Monthly
Min. /
Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 Step 6 Step 7 Step 8 Step 9 Step 10 Approx
Monthly
Max. /
Step 11
B49 ACCOUNTANT I BCEA 07/05/2025 $6,603.81 $6,768.90 $6,938.13 $7,111.58 $7,289.37 $7,471.60 $7,658.39 $7,849.85 $8,046.10 $8,247.26 $8,453.44A31 ACCOUNTANT II APEA 07/05/2025 $6,886.65 $7,058.82 $7,235.29 $7,416.17 $7,601.57 $7,791.61 $7,986.40 $8,186.06 $8,390.71 $8,600.48 $8,815.50B03 ACCOUNTING TECH I BCEA 07/05/2025 $4,420.83 $4,531.36 $4,644.64 $4,760.76 $4,879.78 $5,001.77 $5,126.82 $5,254.99 $5,386.36 $5,521.02 $5,659.04B02 ACCOUNTING TECH II BCEA 07/05/2025 $4,863.13 $4,984.71 $5,109.33 $5,237.06 $5,367.98 $5,502.19 $5,639.74 $5,780.74 $5,925.25 $6,073.39 $6,225.22B07 ADMIN CLERK I BCEA 07/05/2025 $3,788.28 $3,882.99 $3,980.06 $4,079.56 $4,181.55 $4,286.09 $4,393.24 $4,503.08 $4,615.65 $4,731.04 $4,849.32B06 ADMIN CLERK II BCEA 07/05/2025 $4,165.52 $4,269.66 $4,376.39 $4,485.80 $4,597.95 $4,712.90 $4,830.72 $4,951.50 $5,075.28 $5,202.17 $5,332.22E05 ADMIN SVCS DIR N/A 07/20/2024 $17,372.00 $20,846.46B05 ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT BCEA 07/05/2025 $4,605.75 $4,720.89 $4,838.91 $4,959.89 $5,083.89 $5,210.98 $5,341.26 $5,474.80 $5,611.66 $5,751.96 $5,895.75 UR2 AMBULANCE OPERATOR (NS) N/A 05/21/2024 $3,293.33 $4,215.75 A38 ASSISTANT CITY ENG APEA 07/05/2025 $11,233.70 $11,514.54 $11,802.41 $12,097.46 $12,399.91 $12,709.90 $13,027.65 $13,353.35 $13,687.18 $14,029.36 $14,380.10E01 ASSISTANT CITY MGR / DIR N/A 07/20/2024 $20,412.68 $24,495.29B46 ASSISTANT ENGINEER BCEA 07/05/2025 $7,348.47 $7,532.19 $7,720.50 $7,913.51 $8,111.34 $8,314.13 $8,521.98 $8,735.03 $8,953.40 $9,177.24 $9,406.67B10 ASSISTANT PLANNER BCEA 07/05/2025 $6,540.62 $6,704.13 $6,871.74 $7,043.53 $7,219.62 $7,400.11 $7,585.11 $7,774.73 $7,969.10 $8,168.33 $8,372.54A02 ASSOCIATE ENGINEER APEA 07/05/2025 $8,684.10 $8,901.21 $9,123.74 $9,351.83 $9,585.64 $9,825.27 $10,070.90 $10,322.67 $10,580.74 $10,845.25 $11,116.39A04 ASSOCIATE PLANNER APEA 07/05/2025 $7,510.28 $7,698.04 $7,890.49 $8,087.75 $8,289.95 $8,497.19 $8,709.63 $8,927.37 $9,150.55 $9,379.31 $9,613.79B28 ASST TO THE CITY CLERK BCEA 07/05/2025 $4,766.88 $4,886.05 $5,008.20 $5,133.41 $5,261.75 $5,393.29 $5,528.12 $5,666.32 $5,807.98 $5,953.18 $6,102.01A25 ASST TO THE CITY MGR APEA 07/05/2025 $9,253.31 $9,484.64 $9,721.75 $9,964.79 $10,213.91 $10,469.26 $10,730.99 $10,999.26 $11,274.25 $11,556.11 $11,845.01A58 BLDG & FAC ADMIN APEA 07/05/2025 $8,093.47 $8,295.80 $8,503.20 $8,715.78 $8,933.68 $9,157.02 $9,385.94 $9,620.59 $9,861.11 $10,107.64 $10,360.34 M01 BLDG & SAFETY MGR MGMT NS 07/05/2025 $12,299.00 $12,606.47 $12,921.64 $13,244.68 $13,575.80 $13,915.19 $14,263.07 $14,619.65 $14,985.14 $15,359.76 $15,743.76 B04 BUILDING MAINT TECH BCEA 07/05/2025 $5,412.92 $5,548.25 $5,686.95 $5,829.13 $5,974.85 $6,124.23 $6,277.34 $6,434.26 $6,595.12 $6,759.99 $6,928.99 M23 BUILDING OFFICIAL MGMT NS 07/05/2025 $10,105.19 $10,357.82 $10,616.77 $10,882.18 $11,154.24 $11,433.10 $11,718.92 $12,011.90 $12,312.20 $12,620.01 $12,935.51 B37 BUSINESS OUTREACH SP BCEA 07/05/2025 $5,251.90 $5,383.20 $5,517.77 $5,655.72 $5,797.12 $5,942.05 $6,090.60 $6,242.86 $6,398.93 $6,558.90 $6,722.87B69 BUYER BCEA 07/05/2025 $5,543.88 $5,682.48 $5,824.54 $5,970.15 $6,119.41 $6,272.39 $6,429.20 $6,589.93 $6,754.68 $6,923.54 $7,096.63 M16 CITY CLERK MGMT NS 07/05/2025 $11,661.84 $11,953.38 $12,252.22 $12,558.52 $12,872.48 $13,194.30 $13,524.15 $13,862.26 $14,208.81 $14,564.04 $14,928.14 B66 CITY CLERK SPECIALIST BCEA 07/05/2025 $4,165.52 $4,269.66 $4,376.39 $4,485.80 $4,597.95 $4,712.90 $4,830.72 $4,951.50 $5,075.28 $5,202.17 $5,332.22 M02 CITY ENGINEER MGMT NS 07/05/2025 $12,802.08 $13,122.13 $13,450.19 $13,786.44 $14,131.10 $14,484.38 $14,846.49 $15,217.66 $15,598.09 $15,988.05 $16,387.75 3 CITY MANAGER N/A 03/29/2025 $28,424.25
M03 CITY PLANNER MGMT NS 07/05/2025 $12,263.79 $12,570.39 $12,884.65 $13,206.77 $13,536.95 $13,875.37 $14,222.26 $14,577.82 $14,942.26 $15,315.81 $15,698.71 N10 CIVILIAN INVESTIGATOR POLICE 01/05/2025 $6,352.55 $6,511.14 $6,674.62 $6,842.15 $7,012.94 $7,187.79 $7,367.53 $7,552.15 $7,740.83 $7,934.39 $8,132.83 B24 CODE ENFORCE OFFICER BCEA 07/05/2025 $6,556.39 $6,720.30 $6,888.31 $7,060.51 $7,237.03 $7,417.95 $7,603.40 $7,793.48 $7,988.31 $8,188.02 $8,392.72B13 COMBO INSPECTOR I BCEA 07/05/2025 $5,564.83 $5,703.95 $5,846.55 $5,992.71 $6,142.53 $6,296.09 $6,453.50 $6,614.84 $6,780.21 $6,949.72 $7,123.47B12 COMBO INSPECTOR II BCEA 07/05/2025 $6,556.39 $6,720.30 $6,888.31 $7,060.51 $7,237.03 $7,417.95 $7,603.40 $7,793.48 $7,988.31 $8,188.02 $8,392.72 M04 COMM & MKTG MANAGER MGMT NS 07/05/2025 $10,526.60 $10,789.77 $11,059.51 $11,336.00 $11,619.40 $11,909.89 $12,207.64 $12,512.83 $12,825.64 $13,146.29 $13,474.95 A18 COMM & MKTNG ANALYST APEA 07/05/2025 $8,046.76 $8,247.93 $8,454.12 $8,665.47 $8,882.11 $9,104.17 $9,331.77 $9,565.06 $9,804.19 $10,049.29 $10,300.52 M10 COMM DEV MANAGER MGMT NS 07/05/2025 $10,899.92 $11,172.42 $11,451.74 $11,738.03 $12,031.49 $12,332.27 $12,640.58 $12,956.59 $13,280.51 $13,612.51 $13,952.83 A08 COMM SV SPECIALIST I APEA 07/05/2025 $5,219.35 $5,349.83 $5,483.58 $5,620.67 $5,761.19 $5,905.21 $6,052.85 $6,204.17 $6,359.27 $6,518.25 $6,681.21A07 COMM SV SPECIALST II APEA 07/05/2025 $5,893.16 $6,040.49 $6,191.50 $6,346.28 $6,504.94 $6,667.57 $6,834.25 $7,005.11 $7,180.24 $7,359.74 $7,543.73

Brea City CouncilMay 6, 2025

Brea City Council
May 6, 2025