Brentwood City Council
April 23, 2024

APRIL 23, 2024, 7:00 PM

SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 150 CITY PARK WAY
TELECONFERENCE LOCATION: ARIZONA BILTMORE

CONFERENCE CENTER HALLWAY
2400 E. MISSOURI AVE, PHOENIX, AZ 85016
*IMPORTANT NOTICE ABOUT PUBLIC COMMENTS AND MEETING PARTICIPATION* City Council Members will be participating from the Council Chamber. Members of the public are invited to attend and participate at: the Council Chambers, 150 City Park Way, Brentwood CA As a courtesy and technology permitting, members of the public may provide remote public comment during public hearings and on business items via the City’s Zoom Platform. However, the City cannot guarantee that the public’s access to teleconferencing technology will be uninterrupted, and technical difficulties may occur from time to time. In those instances, so long as the public may still attend the meeting in person, the meeting will continue. In addition, the Zoom participation option is provided to the public as a courtesy in order to facilitate participation. If Zoom participation is not enabled, the meeting will continue with public attendance in person only. Members of the public desiring to provide comments as a part of the meeting are encouraged to either submit written comments by 3:00 p.m. prior to the meeting or to attend the meeting in person.

Council Member Mendoza will be participating remotely from a teleconference location at Arizona Biltmore, Conference Center Hallway, 2400 E. Missouri Ave, Phoenix, AZ 85016, the remaining City Council Members will be participating from the Council Chamber.

HOW PARTICIPATE
The public is invited to participate in the City Council meeting using any of the following methods:

1. IN PERSON:
a. Members of the public can provide in-person comments in the Council Chambers or at Arizona Biltmore, Conference Center Hallway, 2400 E. Missouri Ave, Phoenix, AZ 85016.

Members of the public are encouraged, but not required, to fill out a speaker card. The Council Chambers will have seating available for members of the public to attend in person up to full seating capacity.

2. REMOTE (if enabled): Remarks by members of the public participating via Zoom are limited to speaking on items listed under public hearings; business items; and requests for future agendas items, existing requests. Zoom participation during the general public comment period will not be accepted, except in the event a City Council Member is participating remotely under the provisions of Government Code § 54953 (f). a. Zoom: www.brentwoodca.gov/vcc or Zoom Webinar ID: 760 1397 0037 b. Zoom Phone Numbers. Dial Toll Free: (833) 548-0276 or (833) 548-0282 or (877) 853-5247.
c. During the meeting, each period for public comment will be announced, and participants may use the “Raise Hand” feature on Zoom to request to speak. (If you need instructions on how to use this feature, please contact the City Clerk by noon of the meeting date at [email protected] or 925.516.5182.)

3. E-MAIL
a. Public comments can also be submitted via e-mail to [email protected].

Any public comments received up until 3:00 p.m. of the meeting date will be:

1. distributed to the Council via email before the meeting,

2. posted online for public inspection at www.brentwoodca.gov/meetings and

3. later summarized in the meeting minutes.
b. As e-mails containing public meeting comments are part of the official record, note that personal contact information may be published if it is included with your e-mail.

APRIL 23, 2024
PAGE 2 OF 2

4. TO WATCH OR LISTEN ONLY:
a. The public may view the meeting via one-way video feed by selecting the video option at the City Council Agendas’ link on the City webpage at www.brentwoodca.gov or via the City’s YouTube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/c/cityofbrentwoodca

CITY COUNCIL/SUCCESSOR AGENCY AGENDA
Zoom Webinar ID: 760 1397 0037

TELECONFERENCE LOCATION:

Arizona Biltmore
Conference Center Hallway
2400 E. Missouri Ave, Phoenix, AZ 85016

April 23, 2024, 7:00 p.m.

City Council Chambers
150 City Park Way
Brentwood, CA 94513
City Council Zoom Link
A. CALL TO ORDER & ROLL CALL
B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
C. REPORT ON CLOSED SESSION
D. PUBLIC COMMENTS
Pursuant to Council/Administrative Policy, Meeting Rules and Procedures section 5.2 (Decorum Generally – Public), comments by members of the public are generally limited to five minutes, or less time if a large number of speakers is anticipated, or if approved by the Mayor. Speakers desiring answers to questions should direct them to the Council/Successor Agency and, if relevant, they may direct them to the appropriate staff member. Speakers can also follow up directly with staff during regular City business hours.

Please file a speaker’s card with the City Clerk on the form provided on the counter at the back of the Chambers.

During this portion of the meeting those present in the Council Chambers are permitted to speak on items that are listed under Presentations; Informational Reports; Consent Calendar; Requests for Future Agenda Items- New Items; or items not on the agenda during this portion of the meeting. Public comments for scheduled agenda items should wait until that time.

Zoom participation during this general public comment period will not be accepted.

E. INFORMATIONAL REPORTS FROM COUNCIL MEMBERS, COMMITTEES, LIAISONS, AND STAFF This portion of the agenda is to provide an opportunity for Council Members to report on attendance at events, subcommittee meetings, and entities on which the Council Member has been appointed as a liaison and for staff to provide brief updates and/or information to the City Council.

F. CONSENT CALENDAR
All matters listed on the consent calendar are considered routine in nature and will be enacted by one motion. If discussion is required, that particular item will be removed from the consent calendar and will be considered separately.

F.1 Minutes of the City Council/Successor Agency meeting of April 9, 2024 F.2 Minutes of the Special City Council meeting of April 9, 2024 F.3 A Proclamation Proclaiming April 26, 2024, as Arbor Day F.4 A Proclamation Proclaiming May 5 - 11, 2024, as Municipal Clerk's Week F.5 A Proclamation Proclaiming May 2, 2024, as National Day of Prayer F.6 A Proclamation Proclaiming May 12 - 18, 2024, as Police Week F.7 A Proclamation Proclaiming May 13 - 19, 2024, as Bike to Work Week F.8 A Proclamation Proclaiming May as Jewish American Heritage Month F.9 A Proclamation Proclaiming May as Asian American and Pacific Islanders Heritage Month F.10 A Proclamation Proclaiming May as Older Americans Month F.11 A Proclamation Proclaiming May as Water Awareness Month F.12 A Proclamation Proclaiming May as Building and Safety Month F.13 Award a contract to Sandstone Environmental Engineering, Inc. for the Pavement Management Program 2024 (Concrete), CIP Project No. 336-31703.

Title/Recommendation
Adopt a Resolution approving the contract, awarding the bid and authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute a contract and necessary documents for the Pavement Management Program 2024 (Concrete), CIP Project No. 336-31703, (“Project”) with Sandstone Environmental Engineering, Inc. (“Sandstone”) as the lowest responsible and responsive bidder in the amount of $378,110, plus funding authorization for a 15% contingency of $56,716.50, for a total funding authorization not to exceed amount of $434,826.50.

F.14 A Resolution accepting park and landscaping improvements on Parcel ‘D’ (Magpie Park).

Title/Recommendation
Adopt a Resolution accepting the park and landscaping improvements on Parcel ‘D’ of the Chandler development (Subdivision 9428) for maintenance by the City and request that the City Clerk file this Resolution with the Recorder of Contra Costa County.

F.15 Consideration of actions pertaining to the City’s Landscape and Lighting Assessment Districts, including Landscape and Lighting Assessment Districts No. 19-3 and No. 21-1, and the Citywide Park Maintenance District No. 98-1 for Fiscal Year 2024/25.

Title/Recommendation
Adopt a Resolution declaring the intention to order improvements for the Landscape & Lighting Assessment Districts, Landscape and Lighting District No. 19-3, Landscape and Lighting Assessment District No. 21-1 (collectively, the “LLADs”), and the Citywide Park Maintenance District No. 98-1 for Fiscal Year 2024/25; declaring the intention to levy and collect assessments; and setting the date of May 28, 2024, at 7:00 p.m. or at such time thereafter that the matter can be heard for the public hearing in accordance with the provisions of the Streets and Highways Code “Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972” and California Proposition No. 218.

F.16 Purchase two new solid waste collection trucks, and authorize the City Manager or designee to execute any necessary documents in a total amount not to exceed $951,050.

Title/Recommendation
Adopt a Resolution approving the purchase of two new collection vehicles for the Solid Waste Division, one residential Labrie split body truck and one Labrie front load truck, from Arata Equipment Company in San Carlos, CA; and authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute any necessary documents in an amount not to exceed $951,050 for fiscal year 2023/24.

F.17 An Agreement with Robertson-Bryan, Inc. for environmental compliance services for the Solid Waste Organics Diversion project and the Water and Wastewater Laboratory project.

Title/Recommendation
Adopt a Resolution approving the contract documents and authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute an Agreement with Robertson-Bryan, Inc. for environmental compliance services for the Solid Waste Organics Diversion, CIP Project No. 542-54021 (SW Project), and the Water and Wastewater Laboratory, CIP Project No. 592-59207 (Laboratory Project), in the amount not to exceed $252,575.

F.18 2023 Military Equipment Annual report, Determination of AB 481 Compliance, Renewal of Military Equipment Ordinance, and Approval of Military Equipment Title/Recommendation
Adopt a Resolution 1) accepting the 2023 Military Equipment Annual Report; 2) determining that the Brentwood Police Department’s (BPD) use of military equipment in 2023 complied with BPD Policy 708 and applicable state laws; 3) determining that, based on the 2023 Military Equipment Annual Report, each type of military equipment identified in that report has complied with the standards for approval set forth in applicable state laws, including Government Code section 7071(e); 4) renew Ordinance No. 1037, thereby determining that Policy 708 shall be continued without change; and 5) approving the BPD’s funding, acquisition, and use of military equipment to preserve life and enhance the safety of citizens and officers.

F.19 An Informational Summary and Overview of Recent Statewide Housing and Land Use Legislation
Title/Recommendation
Receive an informational summary and overview of housing and land use related legislation from the 2023 legislative session.

F.20 Informational Report on Final Map of Subdivision No. 9452, Cowell Ranch, developed by Shea Homes, LP.

Title/Recommendation
Receive and file an Informational Report on Final Map approval by the City Manager of Subdivision No. 9452, Cowell Ranch, developed by Shea Homes, LP, located south of Marsh Creek Road and east of Vineyards Parkway (APN’s 007-380-002 and 007-380-003).

G. PUBLIC HEARINGS
Persons addressing the City Council using Zoom are asked to raise their hands using the Zoom feature. Those attending in person and wishing to address the Council may do so from the podium. The Council may adopt reasonable regulations at the onset of the public hearing to facilitate public testimony. These regulations may include time limits. In the absence of such regulations, the public hearing shall follow the protocol for Public Comments.

G.1 An Extension of Interim Urgency Ordinance implementing Interim Objective Design Standards for residential housing projects in the City of Brentwood, and finding the action exempt from CEQA
Title/Recommendation
Approve an extension of the urgency ordinance for a second and final time, for a period of one year, approving Interim Objective Design Standards while the City develops a more robust set of residential design and development standards to ensure that projects deliver high-quality design, appropriate site planning and amenities, and are compatible with surrounding neighborhoods and the community.

H. BUSINESS ITEMS
Persons addressing the City Council using Zoom are asked to raise their hands using the Zoom feature. Those attending in person and wishing to address the Council may do so from the podium. The Council may adopt reasonable regulations at the onset of each business item to facilitate public testimony. These regulations may include time limits. In the absence of such regulations, the item shall follow the protocol for Public Comments. Public comment on each of the following items is limited to what is described in the specific agenda item.

H.1 Extension of Urgency Ordinance and Introduction and Waiver of First Reading of a Permanent Ordinance Implementing a Modification to the Brentwood Municipal Code to allow Pad-Mounted Transformers within Development Projects.

Title/Recommendation
(1) Approve an extension of the Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 1072 adopted on March 26, 2024, allowing Permittees to install pad-mounted transformers within development projects while the City monitors the nationwide supply chain issues related to underground transformers, and (2) introduce and waive the first reading of a permanent ordinance to amend Brentwood Municipal Code Section 16.120.120.

Neither the proposed Interim Urgency Ordinance, nor the permanent ordinance, is an action subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), as the actions have no potential for resulting in physical change to the environment. (14 Cal. Code. Regs. § 15358.) Further, adoption of the Urgency Ordinance extension and permanent ordinance are exempt under CEQA because they will not cause a change in any of the physical conditions within the area affected by the ordinances. (14 Cal. Code Regs. § 15061(b)(3).)
H.2 Update of Parks and Recreation Special Event Process, Consideration of Future New Fees for Special Events, and provide direction to staff
Title/Recommendation
Receive a staff report as a further update to the City Council’s request for more changes to the Parks and Recreation Special Event permitting process. This report includes staff recommendations for new fees for hosting Special Events and references City Council direction provided at previous City Council meetings held on June 27, 2023, and January 9, 2024. Staff recommends that Council receive this report authorizing the proposed fees to be included for approval in the forthcoming Cost Allocation Plan in FY 24/25.

H.3 Memorandum of Understanding between the City and the Downtown Brentwood Coalition for downtown district programming and management services Title/Recommendation
Adopt a Resolution approving a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the City and the Downtown Brentwood Coalition for the delivery of downtown programming and management services for fiscal years 2024/25 and 2025/26 not to exceed $140,000.

H.4 Creation of the Brentwood Municipal Code Review Committee Title/Recommendation
Consider the creation of the Brentwood Municipal Code Review Committee, provide direction on the proposed scope, appoint two members of the City Council, set a regular meeting date, and request the Planning Commission appoint one of its members as an advisory member to the committee.

I. REQUEST FOR FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS - NEW REQUEST(S)
Council Members wishing to have an agenda item placed on a future agenda shall make a request under this section of the agenda. These items will be included on the agenda for the next Council meeting
J. REQUESTED FUTURE AGENDA ITEM(S)
J.1 Consider a request from Vice Mayor Meyer related to an overview of the City’s economic development efforts
Title/Recommendation
That the City Council consider and discuss a request from Vice Mayor Meyer from the City Council meeting of April 9, 2024, related to an overview of the City’s economic development efforts, including a PA-1 (Innovation Center @ Brentwood) update.

J.2 Consider a request from Council Member Mendoza related to traffic on Minnesota Avenue Title/Recommendation
That the City Council consider and discuss a request from Council Member Mendoza, from the City Council meeting of April 9, 2024, related to traffic on Minnesota and the potential purchase and placement of an additional mobile radar trailer.

J.3 Consider a request from Council Member Mendoza related to letters of support or opposition to California state legislation
Title/Recommendation
That the City Council consider and discuss a request from Council Member Mendoza from the City Council meeting of April 9, 2024, requesting staff prepare letters of support or opposition to California state legislation consistent with the City’s Signature policy, and provide staff direction related to the distribution of the letters including press releases.

K. ADJOURNMENT
Any disclosable public records related to an agenda item for the open session of this meeting distributed to all or a majority of the City Council less than 72 hours before this meeting is available for inspection at City Hall, located at 150 City Park Way, during normal business hours.

These writings will also be available for review at the City Council meeting in the public access binder in the entrance of the City Council Chambers.

Public comments received after 3:00 p.m. of the meeting date, but prior to the start of the meeting, will be emailed to the City Council, posted online at www.brentwoodca.gov/councilmeetingonline within one day following the meeting, and will be summarized in the meeting minutes.

The Closed Captioning provided via Zoom is auto generated. It is not the official record and is provided as a convenience.

If you challenge the any of the matters listed under 'Public Hearings' in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the Brentwood City Council at, or prior to, the public hearing
NOTICE
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, the meeting room is wheelchair accessible and disabled parking is available at the City Hall parking lot. If you are a person with a disability and you need disability-related modifications or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk's Office at (925) 516-5440 or fax (925) 516-5441. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting. {28 CFR 35.102-35, 104 ADA Title II}

POSTING STATEMENT
On April 18, 2024, a true and correct copy of this agenda was posted on the City Hall Bulletin Board, outside City Hall, 150 City Park Way, Brentwood, CA 94513 and at our website www.brentwoodca.gov; and at the Teleconference Location: Arizona Biltmore, Conference Center Hallway, 2400 E. Missouri Ave, Phoenix, AZ 85016
A complete packet of information is available for public review at City Hall or on our website at www.brentwoodca.gov

1 CITY COUNCIL/SUCCESSOR AGENCY MINUTES
April 9, 2024, 7:00 p.m.

A. CALL TO ORDER & ROLL CALL
Mayor Bryant called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.

Roll Call found the following members present: Mendoza, Meyer, Pierson, Oerlemans, and Mayor Bryant.

B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Mayor Bryant led the Pledge of Allegiance.

C. PUBLIC COMMENTS
Mayor Bryant opened Public Comments.

Owen Spishock spoke on behalf of the Youth Commission and provided updates on upcoming events.

Paul Jarvis provided comments regarding the trend of political changes and the local impacts.

Roger Marman provided comments related to public safety.

Carolina Villaseca commented on diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) in public schools.

Denise Duran provided comments and updates related to Brentwood Chamber of Commerce events.

Mayor Bryant closed Public Comments.

D. INFORMATIONAL REPORTS FROM COUNCIL MEMBERS, COMMITTEES,

LIAISONS, AND STAFF
Council Member Mendoza reported on attendance at the Residential Objective Design Community Meeting, Cesar Chavez event at Los Medanos College, California Gleaming grand opening and ribbon cutting, Contra Costa County Latino Civic Leaders meeting, Budget Subcommittee meeting, Mayors' Conference, watched the Planning Commission meeting, and the Downtown Brentwood Coalition member meeting.

Council Member Pierson reported on attendance at Juneteenth planning meetings, a Fremont Bank event, and the Police Activities League (PAL) board meeting.

2 Council Member Oerlemans reported on attendance at the Tri Delta Transit board meeting, California Gleaming grand opening and ribbon cutting, ODAT Easter Egg Hunt, Brentwood Police Department swearing-in ceremony, Finance Budget Subcommittee meeting, Rotary fundraising poker tournament, watched the Planning Commission meeting, Downtown Brentwood Coalition member meeting, and attended Youth in Government.

Vice Mayor Meyer reported on attendance at an interview with the consultant conducting the overview of the Brentwood Senior Center, Contra Costa County Consolidation Plan, Day of Service planning meeting, watched the Planning Commission Meeting, attended the Flowers by Bee grand opening, and the Easter Egg Hunt downtown, Hair Encounters third anniversary celebration recognizing Adventure Therapy, East Contra Costa County Historical Society opening day, United Indian Association Holy Spirit event, Residential Objective Design Community Meeting, Youth in Government, and a California Alliance of Local Electeds meeting.

Mayor Bryant reported on attendance at the Mayors' Conference, Parks and Recreation Commission and Arts Commission swearing-in of new commissioners, tour of City Hall with the State Champion Odessey of the Mind participants, and Youth in Government.

Mayor Bryant then turned the meeting over to the Youth in Government students to introduce themselves.

E. CONSENT CALENDAR
Mayor Bryant pulled item E.2 to be heard separately from the Consent Calendar.

Moved by: Pa'tanisha Pierson, Council Member
Seconded by: Tony Oerlemans, Council Member
Adopted the Consent Calendar as recommended by staff, excluding item E.2.

Ayes (5): Jovita Mendoza, Council Member, Susannah Meyer, Vice Mayor, Pa'tanisha Pierson, Council Member, Tony Oerlemans, Council Member, and Joel Bryant, Mayor
Motion Approved (5 to 0)
E.1 Minutes of the City Council/Successor Agency meeting of March 26, 2024
E.2 A Proclamation Proclaiming April 9, 2024, as Youth in Government Day Mayor Bryant presented the Youth in Government Day proclamation to the Brentwood Lions Club.

Ayes (5): Jovita Mendoza, Council Member, Susannah Meyer, Vice Mayor, Pa'tanisha Pierson, Council Member, Tony Oerlemans, Council Member, and Joel Bryant, Mayor

3 Motion Approved (5 to 0)
E.3 A Proclamation Proclaiming April 21-27, 2024, as National Volunteer Week
E.4 A Proclamation Proclaiming April 22, 2024, as Earth Day E.5 Increase the purchase orders with Coast Counties Peterbilt in the amount of $120,000 for heavy-duty diesel truck repair and truck parts.

Adopted Resolution 2024-30 approving and authorizing the City Manager or designee to increase the purchase orders with Coast Counties Peterbilt in the amount of $120,000 for a total purchase order amount of $135,000 for heavy-duty diesel truck service and repair and truck parts.

E.6 Accept the ARCO AM/PM, DR19-003, off-site public improvements for maintenance.

Adopted Resolution 2024-31 accepting off-site public improvements for ARCO for maintenance; accepting the Maintenance Bond; releasing the Improvement Securities and requesting that the City Clerk file this Resolution with the Recorder of Contra Costa County for these improvements, constructed as a part of ARCO AM/PM, DR19-003, located at 6970 Brentwood Boulevard.

E.7 Purchase eleven replacement vehicles and one new vehicle, and authorize the City Manager or designee to execute any necessary associated documents in a total amount not to exceed $656,030.

Adopted Resolution 2024-32 approving the purchase of eleven replacement vehicles (one Ford F150 truck for the Public Works Water Division and two Explorers and eight Police Interceptors for the Police Department) and one new vehicle (Ford Ranger for the Parks & Recreation Department) from Bill Brandt Ford in Brentwood, CA; and authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute any necessary associated documents in a total amount not to exceed $656,030 for fiscal year 2023/24.

E.8 Reimbursement Agreement with Strauch Brother Incorporation, DR 19-003 for off-site traffic signal modifications located at the intersection of Brentwood Boulevard and Sunset Road.

Adopted Resolution 2024-33 approving and authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute a Reimbursement Agreement with Strauch Brother Incorporation (“Developer”) DR 19-003, for costs associated with off-site traffic signal modifications located at the intersection of Brentwood Boulevard and Sunset Road.

4 E.9 Authorizing the Interim City Attorney or Designee to Execute Legal Services Agreements with the law firm of Liebert Cassidy Whitmore in an Amount Not to Exceed $220,000.

Adopted Resolution 2024-34 authorizing the Interim City Attorney or designee to execute legal services agreements with the law firm of Liebert Cassidy Whitmore in an amount not to exceed $220,000.

F. PUBLIC HEARINGS
F.1 Annexation #15 to Community Facilities District No. 5.

Debra Galey, Senior Analyst, presented the item.

Mayor Bryant opened the Public Hearing.

There being no one wishing to speak, Mayor Bryant asked if there were any additional ballots to be submitted, there being none, he asked for a motion to close the Public Hearing.

It was moved/seconded by Council Member Pierson/Vice Mayor Meyer to close the Public Hearing and passed unanimously.

The City Clerk read the results of the special election as 100% affirmative votes.

Moved by: Pa'tanisha Pierson, Council Member
Seconded by: Jovita Mendoza, Council Member
Adopted Resolution 2024-35 determining to annex territory to CFD No. 5 and calling a special election for CFD No. 5.

Ayes (5): Jovita Mendoza, Council Member, Susannah Meyer, Vice Mayor, Pa'tanisha Pierson, Council Member, Tony Oerlemans, Council Member, and Joel Bryant, Mayor
Motion Approved (5 to 0)
Moved by: Pa'tanisha Pierson, Council Member
Seconded by: Susannah Meyer, Vice Mayor
Adopted Resolution 2024-36 determining the results of the special election for the annexation of territory to CFD No. 5.

Ayes (5): Jovita Mendoza, Council Member, Susannah Meyer, Vice Mayor, Pa'tanisha Pierson, Council Member, Tony Oerlemans, Council Member, and Joel Bryant, Mayor
Motion Approved (5 to 0)

5 G. BUSINESS ITEMS
G.1 Vineyards Parkway Traffic Update
Allen Baquilar, Director of Engineering/City Engineer presented the item.

Mayor Bryant opened the public comment period.

Joe Young and Patti Styka submitted public comments by email expressing concerns and suggestions to improve traffic safety.

Joe Young commented on traffic safety concerns.

Dave Gilbert commented on traffic safety concerns.

Phil Henry commented on traffic safety concerns.

Denise Duran commented on traffic safety concerns.

Carolina Villaseca commented on traffic safety concerns.

There being no one else wishing to speak, Mayor Bryant closed the public comment period.

City Council Recessed at 9:28 pm
City Council Reconvened at 9:42 pm
Moved by: Susannah Meyer, Vice Mayor
Seconded by: Jovita Mendoza, Council Member
Received an update on Vineyards Parkway related to acquiring additional Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (“RRFBs”), increasing the duration of flashing time for beacons, most recent traffic study, traffic incident reports for 2022 and 2023, landscape improvements, prepare budget opportunities if unsuccessful on grants, develop specific instructions for landscaping contractor(s), consider the installation of additional speed limit signs, and other measures that the City can implement to improve safety.

The City Council, by motion, directed staff to:
 Paint speed limit on the pavement on Vineyards Parkway at locations deemed appropriate by the City traffic engineer (and potentially Vintage Place)
 Complete re-assessment of stop sign warrant to determine if any further conditions are met
 Install stop signs if warranted. If not, return to the Council with a report
 Reduce landscaping 24” in height or greater where needed at the discretion of City staff

6  Continue seeking grants for RRFB’s
 As staff completes the tasks above, factor the existence of parks into work
 Be proactive on Vineyards amphitheater mitigations or compliance with traffic standards
Ayes (5): Jovita Mendoza, Council Member, Susannah Meyer, Vice Mayor, Pa'tanisha Pierson, Council Member, Tony Oerlemans, Council Member, and Joel Bryant, Mayor
Motion Approved (5 to 0)
G.2 Amendments to City Council/Administrative Policy 110-5, renamed ‘Code of Conduct Policy’
Darin Gale, Assistant City Manager, presented the item.

Mayor Bryant opened the public comment period.

There being no one wishing to speak on the item, Mayor Bryant closed the public comment period.

Moved by: Pa'tanisha Pierson, Council Member
Seconded by: Tony Oerlemans, Council Member
Adopted Resolution 2024-37 approving amendments to City Council/Administrative Policy 110-5, renamed as ‘Code of Conduct Policy', as amended during the meeting.

Ayes (5): Jovita Mendoza, Council Member, Susannah Meyer, Vice Mayor, Pa'tanisha Pierson, Council Member, Tony Oerlemans, Council Member, and Joel Bryant, Mayor
Motion Approved (5 to 0)
G.3 Approve Amendments to the City Council/Administrative Policy 00-9 Renamed as 'Flag Policy' to Allow for Display of Commemorative Flags Margaret Wimberly, City Clerk, presented the item.

Mayor Bryant opened the public comment period.

There being no one wishing to speak on the item, Mayor Bryant closed the public comment period.

Moved by: Pa'tanisha Pierson, Council Member
Seconded by: Jovita Mendoza, Council Member
Adopted Resolution 2024-38 amending the updated Flag Policy to allow commemorative flags and include half-staff policies.

7 Ayes (5): Jovita Mendoza, Council Member, Susannah Meyer, Vice Mayor, Pa'tanisha Pierson, Council Member, Tony Oerlemans, Council Member, and Joel Bryant, Mayor
Motion Approved (5 to 0)
H. REQUEST FOR FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS - NEW REQUEST(S)
Council Member Mendoza requested a traffic review of Minnesota Avenue and the potential purchase of additional mobile speed radar trailers.

Council Member Mendoza requested letters of support and letters of opposition to California state legislation.

Vice Mayor Meyer requested a staff report and overview of Economic Development status, citywide.

I. REQUESTED FUTURE AGENDA ITEM(S)
I.1 Consider a request from Council Member Mendoza related to a report from staff on a potential sales tax measure.

Council Member Mendoza presented the item.

Mayor Bryant opened the public comment period.

Sue Harper spoke in opposition to new sales taxes.

Carolina Villaseca spoke in opposition to new sales taxes.

Sinziana Todor spoke in opposition to new sales taxes.

Marisol Valles spoke in opposition to new sales taxes.

There being no on else wishing to speak, Mayor Bryant closed the public comment period.

Council Member Mendoza withdrew her request.

WITHDRAWN
I.2 Consider a request from Council Member Pierson to amend City Council/Administrative Policy 110-1 'City Council Meeting Rules and Procedures'
Council Member Pierson presented the item.

Mayor Bryant opened the public comment period.

Caroline Villaseca spoke in opposition to moving Informational Reports to the end of the agenda.

Nicole Xavier spoke in opposition to moving Informational Reports to the end of the agenda.

8 Melissa van Ruiten spoke in opposition to moving Informational Reports to the end of the agenda.

There being no one else wishing to speak, Mayor Bryant closed the public comment period.

Council Member Pierson withdrew her request.

WITHDRAWN
I.3 Consider a request from Council Member Pierson related to the annual preparation of a recorded briefing for residents on recent legislative housing laws that are ministerial approvals affecting Brentwood.

Council Member Pierson presented the item.

Mayor Bryant opened the public comment period.

Carolina Villaseca spoke in support of the item.

Melissa van Ruiten spoke in support of the item.

There being no one else wishing to speak on the item, Mayor Bryant closed the public comment period.

Moved by: Pa'tanisha Pierson, Council Member
Seconded by: Susannah Meyer, Vice Mayor
The City Council directed staff to:
 Reach out to the League of California Cities to determine when the optimal time would be to present the information to the Council and public to allow for public input to legislators on prospective bills, and to incorporate the specific author of the legislation into the presentation
 Reach out to law firms or the League of California Cities that could provide the Council and public with an overview of housing legislation two times per year
 In addition to the overview, particular attention be paid to ministerial approval legislation that impacts Brentwood directly Ayes (5): Jovita Mendoza, Council Member, Susannah Meyer, Vice Mayor, Pa'tanisha Pierson, Council Member, Tony Oerlemans, Council Member, and Joel Bryant, Mayor
Motion Approved (5 to 0)
J. ADJOURNMENT
It was motioned/seconded by Vice Mayor Meyer/Council Member Pierson to adjourn the meeting at 11:17 p.m.

1 SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
April 9, 2024, 5:30 p.m.

A. CALL TO ORDER & ROLL CALL
Mayor Bryant called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m.

Roll Call found the following members present: Mendoza, Meyer, Pierson, Oerlemans, and Mayor Bryant.

B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Mayor Bryant led the Pledge of Allegiance.

C. BUSINESS ITEMS
C.1 2024/25 – 2028/29 Capital Improvement Program Workshop Accounting Manager Sonia Agostini, Engineering Manager Vatsle Patel, and Park Maintenance Manager Aaron Wanden presented the item.

Mayor Bryant opened the public comment period.

Nick J. Canata provided comments related to the condition of the sound wall along Balfour Road and Fairview Avenue.

Paul Erchul spoke as a resident from Summerset I and inquired what can be done regarding the sound wall along Balfour Road and Fairview Avenue.

There being no one else wishing to speak, Mayor Bryant closed the public comment period.

Moved by: Pa'tanisha Pierson, Council Member
Seconded by: Jovita Mendoza, Council Member
The City Council, by motion, directed staff to include the Fleet Electrification project in the final draft of the CIP to be brought forward for Council’s consideration of adoption on May 28, 2024.

Ayes (5): Jovita Mendoza, Council Member, Susannah Meyer, Vice Mayor, Pa'tanisha Pierson, Council Member, Tony Oerlemans, Council Member, and Joel Bryant, Mayor
Motion Approved (5 to 0)
D. ADJOURNMENT
It was moved/seconded by Council Member Pierson/Council Member Mendoza to adjourn at 6:41 p.m.

PROCLAMATION
WHEREAS, in 1872, J. Sterling Morton proposed to the Nebraska Board of Agriculture that a special day be set aside for the planting of trees; and
WHEREAS, this holiday, called Arbor Day, was first observed with the planting of more than a million trees; and
WHEREAS, Arbor Day is now observed throughout the nation and the world; and
WHEREAS, trees can reduce the erosion of our precious topsoil by wind and water, cut heating and cooling costs, moderate the temperature, clean the air, produce life-giving oxygen, and provide habitat for wildlife; and WHEREAS, trees are a renewable resource giving us paper, wood for our homes, and fuel for our fires; and
WHEREAS, trees in our City increase property values, enhance the economic vitality of business areas, and beautify our community; and WHEREAS, trees, wherever they are planted, are a source of joy and spiritual renewal;
WHEREAS, the City of Brentwood will celebrate Arbor Day on Saturday, April 27th 2024 from 9am through noon at Veterans Park to plant trees and spread mulch.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED, that the City Council of the City of Brentwood does hereby recognize April 27, 2024 as

ARBOR DAY
and encourage our residents to celebrate and support efforts to protect the trees and woodlands in our community.

Dated this 23rd day of April 2024

Joel R. Bryant, Mayor

PROCLAMATION
WHEREAS, the office of the Professional Municipal Clerk, a time-honored and vital part of local government, exists throughout the world and is the oldest public servant position; and
WHEREAS, the office of the Professional Municipal Clerk provides the professional link between the citizens, the local governing body, and agencies of government at other levels; and
WHEREAS, Professional Municipal Clerks have pledged to be ever mindful of their neutrality and impartiality, rendering equal service to all; and WHEREAS, Professional Municipal Clerks continually strive to improve the administration of their office through participation in education programs, seminars, workshops, and the annual meetings of their region, state, and international professional organizations; and
WHEREAS, it is most appropriate that we recognize the contributions and accomplishments of the office of the professional Municipal Clerk.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED that the City Council of the City of Brentwood does hereby recognize the week of May 5 – May 11, 2024, as

PROFESSIONAL MUNICIPAL CLERKS WEEK
and extends appreciation to our Municipal Clerk, Margaret Wimberly, and to all Municipal Clerks for the vital services they perform and their exemplary dedication to the communities they represent.

Dated this 23rd day of April 2024
Joel R. Bryant, Mayor

PROCLAMATION
WHEREAS; on April 17, 1952, President Truman signed a bill proclaiming the National Day of Prayer into law; and

WHEREAS, in 1972 that the National Prayer Committee was formed and went on to create the National Day of Prayer Task Force; and

WHEREAS, in 1988, President Reagan signed a bill into law decreeing that the National Day of Prayer should be held on the first Thursday of May; and
WHEREAS, the National Day of Prayer is a day when members of all faiths in the community can pray together in their own way; and NOW THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED, we, the City
Council of the City of Brentwood do hereby recognize Thursday, May 2, 2024, as the

NATIONAL DAY OF PRAYER
and invite members of the community to join in observing this day with appropriate programs, ceremonies, and activities.

Dated this 23rd day of April 2024

Joel R. Bryant, Mayor

PROCLAMATION
WHEREAS, the President of the United States has designated May 15th as Peace Officers' Memorial Day, and the week in which May 15th falls as National Police Week; and
WHEREAS, the National Law Enforcement Officers Memorial Fund reported that 136 federal, state, tribal and local law enforcement officers died in the line-of-duty in the United States during the year of 2023; and WHEREAS, the Brentwood Police Department plays an essential role in safeguarding the rights and freedoms of all members of the community; and WHEREAS, it is important that all citizens know and understand the duties, responsibilities, hazards, and sacrifices of their law enforcement agency, and that members of our law enforcement agency recognize their duty to serve the people by safeguarding life and property, by protecting them against violence and disorder, and by protecting the innocent against deception and the weak against oppression; and
WHEREAS, the men and women of the Brentwood Police Department unceasingly provide this vital public service.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED that the City Council of the City of Brentwood does hereby recognize the week of May 12-18, 2024, as

NATIONAL POLICE WEEK
and calls upon all citizens to join in commemorating law enforcement officers, past and present, who, by their faithful and loyal devotion to their responsibilities, have rendered a dedicated service to their communities.

Dated this 23rd day of April 2024
Joel R. Bryant, Mayor

PROCLAMATION
WHEREAS; throughout the month of May, Contra Costa County will celebrate biking and the freedom, the joy, and the well-being it imbues within us, as well as the power that more people riding bikes has in making life better for everyone; and
WHEREAS, May 13-19, 2024 is “Bike to Work Week” and May 17, 2024 is “Bike to Work Day”; and
WHEREAS, bicycling has been shown to improve citizens’ health, well-being, and quality of life, growing the economy of the City of Brentwood, attracting tourism dollars and local business spending, and reducing pollution, congestion and parking costs on our streets and roads; and
WHEREAS, creating a bicycling-friendly community has been shown to improve citizens’ health, well-being, and quality of life; improving traffic safety and reducing pollution, congestion, and wear and tear on streets and roads; and WHEREAS, individuals and organized groups will be celebrating the joys and benefits of bicycling during the month of May 2024; and WHEREAS, Bike East Bay and other Bay Area bicycle clubs will be promoting greater public awareness of bicycle operation and safety education in an effort to reduce collisions, injuries, and fatalities and improve health and safety for everyone on the road.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED that the City Council of the City of Brentwood does hereby recognize
the month of May as
National Bike Month
and Friday, May 17, 2024 as
Bike to Work Day
and encourages residents to participate in events planned throughout the county and further encourages residents to create a safer environment for cyclists by safely sharing the road.

Dated this 23rd day of April 2024
Joel R. Bryant, Mayor

PROCLAMATION
WHEREAS, ever since Jewish immigrants first arrived to the shores of the United States of America, Jewish people have played a central role in the creation, growth, freedom, prosperity, and strength of this country; and WHEREAS, the theological and contemporary history of the Jewish people and the enduring values of the Jewish faith were vital sources of inspiration for the founding of the United States, the Civil Rights movement, the United States’ commitment to social justice, and many of the United States’ most central tenets; and
WHEREAS, for forty-tthree years, every President of the United States has declared a period of time for celebrating the contributions to the United States and the Jewish community’s history, heritage, and culture, and on April 20, 2006, President George W. Bush proclaimed that May would be Jewish American Heritage Month; and
WHEREAS, the City of Brentwood celebrates the countless achievements and invaluable contributions of the Jewish community that enrich our history, society, and culture.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED that the City Council of the City of Brentwood does hereby recognize the month of May as

JEWISH AMERICAN HERITAGE MONTH
and calls upon Brentwood residents to learn more about Jewish American heritage and their contributions to our community.

Dated this 23rd day of April 2024
Joel R. Bryant, Mayor

PROCLAMATION
WHEREAS, the month of May was chosen as Asian/Pacific American Heritage Month to commemorate the immigration of the first Japanese citizen to the United States on May 7, 1843, as well as to mark the anniversary of the completion of the transcontinental railroad, built primarily by 20,000 Chinese immigrants, on May 10, 1869; and
WHEREAS, Contra Costa County’s population is more than 18 percent Asian American and Pacific Islander (“AAPI”) and includes devoted community members who serve as artists, business owners, educators, health care professionals, lawyers and judges, clergy members, first responders, military personnel, and other essential workers; and
WHEREAS, the City of Brentwood celebrates the countless achievements and invaluable contributions of the AAPI community that enrich our history and society and culture; and
WHEREAS, we stand in solidarity with the AAPI community and reaffirm our commitment to recognizing the dignity of all people and we call for moral integrity, respect, and civility from all residents and visitors.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED that the City Council of the City of Brentwood does hereby recognize the month of May as

ASIAN/PACIFIC AMERICAN HERITAGE MONTH
and calls upon Brentwood residents to learn more about Asian American and Pacific Islander heritage and their contributions to our community.

Dated this 23rd day of April 2024

Joel R. Bryant, Mayor

PROCLAMATION
WHEREAS, the City of Brentwood includes a growing number of older Americans who have built resilience and strength over their lives through successes and difficulties; and
WHEREAS, Brentwood benefits when people of all ages, abilities, and backgrounds are included and encouraged to share their successes and stories of resilience; and
WHEREAS, Brentwood recognizes our need to nurture ourselves, reinforce our strength, and continue to thrive in times of both joy and difficulty; and
WHEREAS, Brentwood can work to build an even better community for our older residents by:
• Not limiting our thinking about aging,
• Exploring and combating stereotypes,
• Emphasizing the many positive aspects of aging,
• Inspiring older adults to push past traditional boundaries, and • Embracing our community’s diversity.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED that the City Council
of the City of Brentwood does hereby recognize the month of May as

OLDER AMERICANS MONTH
and encourages every resident to recognize older adults and the people who support them as essential contributors to the strength of our community.

Dated this 23rd day of April 2024
Joel R. Bryant, Mayor

PROCLAMATION
WHEREAS, the City of Brentwood recognizes the vital role that swimming and aquatic-related activities relate to good physical and mental health and enhance the quality of life for all people; and
WHEREAS, the City of Brentwood understands the essential role that education regarding the topic of water safety plays in preventing drowning and recreational water-related injuries; and
WHEREAS, the City of Brentwood is aware of the contributions made by the recreational water industry, as represented by the Association of Pool & Spa Professionals, the National Recreation & Park Association and the World Waterpark Association in developing safe swimming facilities, aquatic programs, home pools and spas, and related activities providing healthy places to recreate, learn and grow, build self-esteem, confidence and sense of self-worth which contributes to the quality of life in our community; and
WHEREAS, the City of Brentwood recognizes the ongoing efforts and commitments to educate the public on pool and spa safety issues and initiatives by the pool, spa, waterpark, recreation and parks industries; and WHEREAS, the City of Brentwood understands the vital importance of communicating Water Safety rules and programsto families and individuals of all ages, whether owners of private pools, users of public swimming facilities, or visitors to waterparks; and
WHEREAS, the City of Brentwood has taken a pro-active stance in support of statewide and national efforts in water safety awareness and aquatic education programs by its inclusion in Council/Administrative Policy 90-3, (Wellness Policy) Section 11.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED that the City Council of the City of Brentwood does hereby recognize the month of May as

NATIONAL WATER SAFETY MONTH
and encourage all residents to participate in efforts to reduce drowning risk by preparing themselves and their families in the proper water safety response procedures that help to protect and save lives.

Dated this 23rd day of April 2024
Joel R. Bryant, Mayor

PROCLAMATION
WHEREAS, the City of Brentwood is committed to recognizing that our growth and strength depends on the safety and essential role our homes, buildings and infrastructure play, both in everyday life and when disasters strike; and WHEREAS, our confidence in the resilience of these buildings that make up our community is achieved through the devotion of vigilant guardians––building safety and fire prevention officials, architects, engineers, builders, tradespeople, design professionals, laborers, plumbers and others in the construction industry–– who work year-round to ensure the safe construction of buildings; and WHEREAS, these modern building codes include safeguards to protect the public from hazards such as hurricanes, snowstorms, tornadoes, wildland fires, floods and earthquakes; and
WHEREAS, Building Safety Month is sponsored by the International Code Council to remind the public about the critical role of our communities’ largely unknown protectors of public safety––our local code officials––who assure us of safe, sustainable and affordable buildings that are essential to our prosperity; and WHEREAS, “Mission Possible,” the theme for Building Safety Month 2024, encourages us all to raise awareness about building safety on a personal, local and global scale; and
WHEREAS, each year, in observance of Building Safety Month, people all over the world are asked to consider the commitment to improve building safety, resilience and economic investment at home and in the community, and to acknowledge the essential service provided to all of us by local and state building departments, fire prevention bureaus and federal agencies in protecting lives and property.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED, that the City Council of the City of Brentwood does hereby recognize the month of May as

BUILDING SAFETY MONTH
and encourage our residents to join us as we participate in Building Safety Month activities.

Dated this 23rd day of April 2024

Joel R. Bryant, Mayor

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO. F.13
04/23/2024
SUBJECT: Award a contract to Sandstone Environmental Engineering, Inc. for the Pavement Management Program 2024 (Concrete), CIP Project No. 336-31703.

DEPARTMENT: Engineering
STAFF: Allen Baquilar, Director of Engineering/City Engineer Brant Wilson, Senior Associate Engineer
Renee Payette, Project Services Specialist

TITLE/RECOMMENDATION
Adopt a Resolution approving the contract, awarding the bid and authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute a contract and necessary documents for the Pavement Management Program 2024 (Concrete), CIP Project No. 336-31703, (“Project”) with Sandstone Environmental Engineering, Inc. (“Sandstone”) as the lowest responsible and responsive bidder in the amount of $378,110, plus funding authorization for a 15% contingency of $56,716.50, for a total funding authorization not to exceed amount of $434,826.50.

FISCAL IMPACT
The total bid amount is $378,110, plus funding authorization for a 15% contingency of $56,716.50, for a total funding authorization of $434,826.50.

The funds for this Project are included in the 2023/24-2027/28 Capital Improvement Program (“CIP”). The Project is funded by the General Fund and Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (“RMRA”) Funds. The City has received a FY 2023/24 Metropolitan Transportation Commission Transportation Development Act grant in the amount of $100,000 for the Spruce Street sidewalk, and this portion will be funded through the City’s Grant Fund.

BACKGROUND
This Project is located at various city-wide locations and consists of the removal and replacement of concrete sidewalk, ADA ramps, driveway approach, curb and gutter; and adjusting utilities to grade; as well as constructing a sidewalk along Spruce Street adjacent to Liberty High School. Attached is a List of Locations.

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO. F.13
04/23/2024
The Project was advertised on February 28, 2024, and bids were opened on March 21, 2024. The following six bids were received.

Bidder Bid Amount
Sandstone Environmental Engineering, Inc. $378,110
TNB Construction $412,850
Kerex Engineering, Inc. $488,680
FBD Vanguard Construction, Inc. $608,767
B&M Builder’s, Inc. $626,680
Saboo, Inc. $815,480
Staff reviewed the bids received and is recommending the award of the contract to Sandstone for submitting the lowest responsible and responsive bid for the Project.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC INITIATIVE
Not Applicable.

PREVIOUS ACTION
Previous Action by the City Council is included on Attachment 1.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
A Notice of Exemption was filed with the Contra Costa County Clerk Recorder on March 27, 2024.

ALTERNATIVE OPTION(S)
Alternative Options to the Staff Recommendation:

1. Do not approve staff’s recommendation.

2. Modify staff’s recommendation based on legally defensible findings.

3. Continue item with direction for staff to return with additional information.

ATTACHMENT(S)

1. Previous Action

2. Resolution

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO. F.13
04/23/2024

3. List of Locations

4. Contract

5. CIP Sheet

ATTACHMENT 1 – PREVIOUS ACTION
Previous actions related to this agenda item that were taken by the Council are listed below. To view prior actions and materials, and Brentwood Municipal Code references in the staff report, as applicable:
 Visit www.brentwoodca.gov/meetings, and select the meeting date(s) desired to see the reference materials and videos.
 Visit www.brentwoodca.gov/municipalcode to research references to the Brentwood Municipal Code and search by the code section(s) cited.

On June 13, 2023, by Resolution No. 2023-80, the City Council adopted the 2023/24 – 2027/28 Capital Improvement Program, which included the Project.

RESOLUTION NO. 2024-XX

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

BRENTWOOD APPROVING THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS,

AWARDING THE BID AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER

OR DESIGNEE TO EXECUTE A CONTRACT AND NECESSARY

DOCUMENTS FOR THE PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
2024 (CONCRETE), CIP PROJECT NO. 336-31703, WITH
SANDSTONE ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, INC. AS THE

LOWEST RESPONSIBLE AND RESPONSIVE BIDDER IN THE
AMOUNT OF $378,110, PLUS FUNDING AUTHORIZATION FOR A
15% CONTINGENCY OF $56,716.50, FOR A TOTAL FUNDING
AUTHORIZATION NOT TO EXCEED AMOUNT OF $434,826.50.

WHEREAS, on June 13, 2023, by Resolution No. 2023-80, the City Council adopted the 2023/24 – 2027/28 Capital Improvement Program, which included the Pavement Management Program 2024, CIP Project No. 336-31703 (“Project”); and WHEREAS, this Project is located at various city-wide locations and consists of the removal and replacement of concrete sidewalk, ADA ramps, driveway approach, curb and gutter; and adjusting utilities to grade; as well as construction a sidewalk along Spruce Street adjacent to Liberty High School; and WHEREAS, the Project was advertised on February 28, 2024, and six bids were received and opened on March 21, 2024; and
WHEREAS, staff reviewed the bids received and is recommending the award of the contract for the Project to Sandstone Environmental Engineering, Inc. for submitting the lowest responsible and responsive bid.

NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Brentwood does hereby approve the contract documents, award the bid and authorize the City Manager or designee to execute a contract and necessary documents for the Pavement Management Program 2024 (Concrete), CIP Project No. 336-31703, with Sandstone Environmental Engineering, Inc. as the lowest responsible and responsive bidder in the amount of $378,110, plus funding authorization for a 15% contingency of $56,716.50, for a total funding authorization not to exceed amount of $434,826.50.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Brentwood at a regular meeting held on the 23rd day of April 2024 by the following vote:

ADA Curb Ramp Upgrade:

Cloverleaf Cir
Sunset Rd
New Sidewalk Construction:

Spruce St
Sidewalk, Curb and Gutter Repairs:

Anderson Ln Dante Ct Lucca Ct Remington St
Arlington Way Dawnview Dr Lundin Ln Roosevelt Dr
Ascot Pl Del Monte Ct McClarren Rd Shasta Daisy Dr
Barcelona Ct Edgefield Pl Mills Dr Spanish Bay Dr
Berry Ln Emerson Ln Montclair Pl Spyglass Dr
Bing Ct First St Monterey Ct St Augustine Dr
Birchwood Rd Ford St Monterrosa Ct Sweetbriar Ct
Buena Vista St Haystack Ct Mountain View Dr Tamalpais Ave Carter Pl Hudson Dr Nassau Ln Tulare St
Castellina Dr Huntington Pl Oxford Ln Vernazze Ct
Cheshire Dr Kenwood Dr Pacific Grove Ct Vivian St
Collis St Lambert Ct Pacifica Dr Whitehall Ln
Continente Ave Latham Ct Pebble Beach Dr Wright Way
Country Glen Ln Lawrence Ln Pescara Blvd Yardley Pl
Pavement Management Program 2024 (Concrete)
List of Locations

Contract
This public works contract (“Contract”) is entered into by and between the City of Brentwood (“City”) and Sandstone Environmental Engineering Inc., a C Corporation (“Contractor”), for work on the Pavement Management Program 2024 (Concrete), CIP Project No. 336-31703 (“Project”).

The parties agree as follows:

1. Award of Contract. In response to the Notice Inviting Bids, Contractor has submitted a Bid Proposal to perform the Work to construct the Project. On April 23, 2024, City authorized award of this Contract to Contractor for the amount set forth in Section 4, below. City has elected to include the following Project alternate(s) in the Contract: No alternates.

2. Contract Documents. The Contract Documents incorporated into this Contract include and are comprised of all of the documents listed below. The definitions provided in Article 1 of the General Conditions apply to all of the Contract Documents, including this Contract.

2.1 Notice Inviting Bids;

2.2 Instructions to Bidders;

2.3 Addenda, if any;

2.4 Bid Proposal and attachments thereto;

2.5 Contract;

2.6 Payment and Performance Bonds;

2.7 General Conditions;

2.8 Special Conditions;

2.9 Project Plans and Specifications;

2.10 Change Orders, if any;

2.11 Notice of Potential Award;

2.12 Notice to Proceed; and

2.13 The following: No other documents.

3. Contractor’s Obligations. Contractor will perform all of the Work required for the Project, as specified in the Contract Documents. Contractor must provide, furnish, and supply all things necessary and incidental for the timely performance and completion of the Work, including all necessary labor, materials, supplies, tools, equipment, transportation, onsite facilities, and utilities, unless otherwise specified in the Contract Documents. Contractor must use its best efforts to diligently prosecute and complete the Work in a professional and expeditious manner and to meet or exceed the performance standards required by the Contract Documents.

4. Payment. As full and complete compensation for Contractor’s timely performance and completion of the Work in strict accordance with the terms and conditions of the Contract Documents, City will pay Contractor $378,110 (“Contract Price”) for all of Contractor’s direct and indirect costs to perform the Work, including all labor, materials, supplies, equipment, taxes, insurance, bonds and all overhead costs, in accordance with the payment provisions in the General Conditions.

5. Time for Completion. Contractor will fully complete the Work for the Project, meeting all requirements for Final Completion, within 66 calendar days from the start date set forth in the Notice to Proceed (“Contract Time”). By signing below, Contractor expressly waives any claim for delayed early completion.

6. Liquidated Damages. As further specified in Section 5.4 of the General Conditions, if Contractor fails to complete the Work within the Contract Time, City will assess liquidated damages in the amount of $2,500 per day for each day of unexcused delay in achieving Final Completion, and such liquidated damages may be deducted from City’s payments due or to become due to Contractor under this Contract.

7. Labor Code Compliance.

7.1 General. This Contract is subject to all applicable requirements of Chapter 1 of Part 7 of Division 2 of the Labor Code, including requirements pertaining to wages, working hours and workers’ compensation insurance, as further specified in Article 9 of the General Conditions.

7.2 Prevailing Wages. This Project is subject to the prevailing wage requirements applicable to the locality in which the Work is to be performed for each craft, classification or type of worker needed to perform the Work, including employer payments for health and welfare, pension, vacation, apprenticeship and similar purposes. Copies of these prevailing rates are available online at http://www.dir.ca.gov/DLSR.

7.3 DIR Registration. City may not enter into the Contract with a bidder without proof that the bidder and its Subcontractors are registered with the California Department of Industrial Relations to perform public work pursuant to Labor Code § 1725.5, subject to limited legal exceptions.

8. Workers’ Compensation Certification. Pursuant to Labor Code § 1861, by signing this Contract, Contractor certifies as follows: “I am aware of the provisions of Labor Code § 3700 which require every employer to be insured against liability for workers’ compensation or to undertake selfinsurance in accordance with the provisions of that code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the Work on this Contract.”

9. Conflicts of Interest. Contractor, its employees, Subcontractors, and agents may not have, maintain, or acquire a conflict of interest in relation to this Contract in violation of any City ordinance or requirement, or in violation of any California law, including Government Code § 1090 et seq., or the Political Reform Act, as set forth in Government Code § 81000 et seq. and its accompanying regulations. Any violation of this Section constitutes a material breach of the Contract.

10. Independent Contractor. Contractor is an independent contractor under this Contract and will have control of the Work and the means and methods by which it is performed. Contractor and its Subcontractors are not employees of City and are not entitled to participate in any health, retirement, or any other employee benefits from City.

11. Notice. Any notice, billing, or payment required by or pursuant to the Contract Documents must be made in writing, signed, dated, and sent to the other party by personal delivery, U.S. Mail, a reliable overnight delivery service, or by email as a PDF file. Notice is deemed effective upon delivery, except that service by U.S. Mail is deemed effective on the second working day after deposit for delivery. Notice for each party must be given as follows:

City:

City of Brentwood
Engineering Department
150 City Park Way, Brentwood, CA 94513
925.516.5420
Attn: Brant Wilson, PE, Senior Associate Engineer
[email protected]

Contractor:

Name: Sandstone Environmental Engineering Inc.

Address: 3140 Anderson Lane
City/State/Zip: Oakley, CA 94561
Phone: 510.334.7932
Attn: Martin Castillo
Email: [email protected]
Copy to: Juan Orozco, Estimator – [email protected]

12. General Provisions.

12.1 Assignment and Successors. Contractor may not assign its rights or obligations under this Contract, in part or in whole, without City’s written consent. This Contract is binding on Contractor’s and City’s lawful heirs, successors and permitted assigns.

12.2 Third Party Beneficiaries. There are no intended third party beneficiaries to this Contract.

12.3 Governing Law and Venue. This Contract will be governed by California law and venue will be in the Contra Costa County Superior Court, and no other place. Contractor waives any right it may have pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure § 394, to file a motion to transfer any action arising from or relating to this Contract to a venue outside of Contra Costa County, California.

12.4 Amendment. No amendment or modification of this Contract will be binding unless it is in a writing duly authorized and signed by the parties to this Contract.

12.5 Integration. This Contract and the Contract Documents incorporated herein, including authorized amendments or Change Orders thereto, constitute the final, complete, and exclusive terms of the agreement between City and Contractor.

12.6 Severability. If any provision of the Contract Documents is determined to be illegal, invalid, or unenforceable, in whole or in part, the remaining provisions of the Contract Documents will remain in full force and effect.

12.7 Iran Contracting Act. If the Contract Price exceeds $1,000,000, Contractor certifies, by signing below, that it is not identified on a list created under the Iran Contracting Act, Public Contract Code § 2200 et seq. (the “Act”), as a person engaging in investment activities in Iran, as defined in the Act, or is otherwise expressly exempt under the Act.

12.8 Authorization. Each individual signing below warrants that he or she is authorized to do so by the party that he or she represents, and that this Contract is legally binding on that party. If Contractor is a corporation, signatures from two officers of the corporation are required pursuant to California Corporations Code § 313.

12.9 Digital/Electronic Signatures. Using a City-approved method, this Contract may be executed through the use of digital or electronic signatures in accordance with Government Code Section 16.5. The presence of an electronic signature on this Contract will be construed as the Parties’ consent to do business electronically. [Signatures are on the following page.]

The parties agree to this Contract as witnessed by the signatures below:

CITY: Approved as to form:
s/_______________________________ s/__________________________________ Tim Y. Ogden, City Manager Katherine Wisinski, Interim City Attorney Date: ___________________________ Date: ______________________________

Attest:
s/_______________________________
Margaret Wimberly MMC, City Clerk
Date: ___________________________
CONTRACTOR: Sandstone Environmental Engineering Inc.

Business Name
s/_______________________________ Seal:

Martin Castillo, President/Secretary
Date: ____________________________
Second Signature (See Section 12.8):
s/_______________________________
_________________________________
Name, Title
Date: ____________________________
___________________________________________________
Contractor’s California License Number(s) and Expiration Date(s)

END OF CONTRACT

53 City of Brentwood 2023/24 – 2027/28 Capital Improvement Program Project Title: * MULTI-YEAR * Project #:

Pavement Management Program - 2024
Description/Justification:

This project is included in the City’s Strategic Plan for FY 2022/23 - FY 2023/24. This project will consist of rehabilitation of existing pavement, sidewalk, curb and gutter. The City completes a pavement condition survey of its roadways every three years.

The City's pavement management software and engineers selects those streets on which it is the most cost effective and beneficial to perform preventative maintenance, and is confirmed with a field verification by staff. The annual pavement management program funds the full depth reconstruction, overlaying, surface sealing and crack sealing of the selected roads.

Constructing roadways is a significant investment for the City. Preventative maintenance is the best means for keeping this large investment in good, operable condition and avoids costly reconstruction. The Pavement Management Program also funds the reconstruction of sidewalk, curb and gutter. The reconstruction helps remove tripping hazards and upgrades the infrastructure to be ADA compliant.

Project Status:

The design and construction phases for this project will begin in FY 2023/24.

Supplemental Information:

Staff actively pursues State and Federal funding for roadway improvements, when possible. Planning and design cost may include geotechnical investigation, surveying, and materials testing. Roads identified may require the following treatments: full depth rehabilitation, grind and asphalt overlay, cape sealing, slurry sealing, crack sealing and concrete curb and gutter repairs.

PROJECT EXPENDITURES Prior 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27 2027/28 TOTAL 70239 Legal 1,500 1,000 $ 2,500
90040 Planning and Design 50,000 $ 50,000
90050 Construction 2,108,096 350,000 $ 2,458,096
TOTAL $ 2,159,596 $ 351,000 $ 2,510,596
PROJECT FUNDING Prior 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27 2027/28 TOTAL 47100 General Fund 910,596 $ 910,596
47209 RMRA 1,600,000 $ 1,600,000
TOTAL $ 2,510,596 $ 2,510,596

PROJECT FINANCING CURRENT PROPOSED
Project Category: Roadway Improvements
Location: Citywide
Project Manager: B. Wilson
Project Priority: 1E - Mandatory
Est. Completion Date: 2024/25
Future Annual
O & M Impact: $0
Public Art
Requirement: Exempt
General Plan Policy: CIR 1-1
336-31703

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO. F.14
04/23/2024
SUBJECT: A Resolution accepting park and landscaping improvements on Parcel ‘D’ (Magpie Park).

DEPARTMENT: Parks and Recreation
STAFF: Bruce Mulder, Parks and Recreation Director
Janice Ellis, Parks Planner

TITLE/RECOMMENDATION
Adopt a Resolution accepting the park and landscaping improvements on Parcel ‘D’ of the Chandler development (Subdivision 9428) for maintenance by the City and request that the City Clerk file this Resolution with the Recorder of Contra Costa County.

FISCAL IMPACT
All costs related to the maintenance of the park and landscaping improvements on Parcel ‘D’ (Magpie Park) of the Chandler development, Subdivision 9428, are included in the $60,724 annual estimate for the areas being accepted for maintenance. The cost of this maintenance is budgeted in the FY 2023/24 Operating Budget.

The special benefit portion ($52,400) will be funded by the Lighting and Landscape Assessment Districts (LLADs) formed to cover these costs and the general benefit portion ($8,324) will be funded by the General Fund.

BACKGROUND
Brookfield Residential (Brookfield), the developer of the Chandler development, formerly known as the Orfanos project, recently submitted a request for the City to consider acceptance of the park and landscaping improvements constructed on Parcel ‘D’ (Magpie Park) of the Chandler development, Subdivision 9428. The required offer of dedication of the park parcel was made with the recordation of the Final Map for Subdivision 9428. Subsequently, the City accepted this dedication of real property for the purpose of a public park. Magpie Park is the second of two (2) parks that were constructed within the Chandler development and is approximately 1.88 acres in size.

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO. F.14
04/23/2024
The developer also established a funding source for the ongoing maintenance of the landscaping improvements by annexing into the existing Landscape and Lighting Assessment District (LLAD) 19-2.

Brookfield recently completed the park and landscaping improvements to Magpie Park, and City staff conducted the required inspections during and following construction for the mandatory 90-day maintenance period. The park amenities inspected were as follows: Four play structures (one with an accessible chair), age appropriate signage for the structures, a shaded picnic area, two fountains with pet bowls (one at the picnic area and the second at the dog parks), two dog parks (small and a large) with artificial turf, benches, trash receptacles, pet stations throughout the park and healthy vegetation. Staff determined that the improvements, including the plant material, irrigation, park amenities, and utility infrastructure at Magpie Park are in substantial conformance with the approved plans and Parks and Recreation Department specifications.

This action will accept for ongoing maintenance by the City the park and landscaping improvements on Parcel ‘D’ (Magpie Park) of the Chandler development, Subdivision 9428. It should be noted that the developer will be responsible for the standard 12- month warranty period for all trees and plant material.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC INITIATIVE
Not Applicable.

PREVIOUS ACTION
Previous Action by the City Council is included on Attachment 1.

DATE OF NOTICE
Not Applicable.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
Not Applicable.

ATTACHMENT(S)

1. Previous Action

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO. F.14
04/23/2024

2. Resolution – Chandler – Brookfield

3. Location Map – Chandler – Brookfield

4. Photographs – Chandler – Brookfield

ATTACHMENT “1”
Previous actions related to this agenda item that were taken by the Council are listed below. To view prior actions and materials, and Brentwood Municipal Code references in the staff report, as applicable:
 Visit www.brentwoodca.gov/meetings, and select the meeting date(s) desired to see the reference materials and videos.
 Visit www.brentwoodca.gov/municipalcode to research references to the Brentwood Municipal Code and search by the code section(s) cited.  On March 14, 2017, by Resolution 2017-34, City Council approved a vesting tentative subdivision map (VTSM 9428) to allow the Subdivision of an approximately twenty-acre site into 160 single-family residential lots, two parks, and one parcel for bio-retention parcel, as well as related improvements for Chandler Development, located at 2800 Empire Avenue (APN 019-010- 003).

RESOLUTION NO. 2024-XX

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

BRENTWOOD TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE PARK
AND LANDSCAPING IMPROVEMENTS ON PARCEL ‘D’ (MAGPIE
PARK) OF THE CHANDLER DEVELOPMENT (SUBDIVISION 9428).

WHEREAS, on March 14, 2017, by Resolution No. 2017-34, City Council approved the Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map for Subdivision 9428; and WHEREAS, on February 26, 2019, by Resolution No. 2019-20, City Council ordered the formation of Landscape & Lighting Assessment District No. 19-2 (Alvernaz); and
WHEREAS, on April 28, 2020, by Resolution No. 2020-54, City Council ordered the annexation of territory into the existing Landscape and Lighting District 19-2 as Annexation No. 1 (Orfanos); and
WHEREAS, Brookfield Residential recently completed the park and landscaping improvements constructed on Parcel ‘D’ (Magpie Park) of the Chandler development, Subdivision 9428; and
WHEREAS, City staff inspected the park and landscaping improvements and determined that they are in substantial conformance with the approved landscape plans for Magpie Park, and comply with the Parks and Recreation Department specifications.

NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Brentwood does hereby accept the park and landscaping improvements on Parcel ‘D’ (Magpie Park) of the Chandler development (Subdivision 9428); PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Brentwood at a regular meeting held on the 23rd day of April 2024 by the following vote:

EXHIBIT “A”
City Park Parcel “D” Magpie Park
CHANDLER RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT (SUB-DIVISION 9428)

EXHIBIT “B”
City Park Parcel “D” Magpie Park
CHANDLER RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT (SUB-DIVISION 9428)

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO. F.15
04/23/2024
SUBJECT: Consideration of actions pertaining to the City’s Landscape and Lighting Assessment Districts, including Landscape and Lighting Assessment Districts No. 19-3 and No. 21-1, and the Citywide Park Maintenance District No. 98-1 for Fiscal Year 2024/25.

DEPARTMENT: Parks and Recreation
STAFF: Bruce Mulder, Director of Parks and Recreation
Aaron Wanden, Park Maintenance Manager

TITLE/RECOMMENDATION
Adopt a Resolution declaring the intention to order improvements for the Landscape & Lighting Assessment Districts, Landscape and Lighting District No. 19-3, Landscape and Lighting Assessment District No. 21-1 (collectively, the “LLADs”), and the Citywide Park Maintenance District No. 98-1 for Fiscal Year 2024/25; declaring the intention to levy and collect assessments; and setting the date of May 28, 2024, at 7:00 p.m. or at such time thereafter that the matter can be heard for the public hearing in accordance with the provisions of the Streets and Highways Code “Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972” and California Proposition No. 218.

FISCAL IMPACT
The draft Fiscal Year 2024/25 Operating Budget includes a $2.15 million City contribution towards the operation, maintenance, and replacement of public improvements associated with the City’s LLADs and Citywide Park Maintenance District. Furthermore, it is anticipated that the City will collect approximately $10.8 million from 65 LLADs, $148,830 from LLAD No. 19-3, $99,071 from LLAD No. 21-1, and $3.8 million from the Citywide Park Maintenance District No. 98-1.

In addition, to ensure the Landscape and Lighting Assessment Districts are selfsupporting, each existing district has had an administrative cost factored into the assessment rate during formation, to cover creation of annual Engineer’s Reports and levying of assessments.

BACKGROUND
The Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (the “1972 Act”) and Proposition 218 require that parcels within an assessment district only be assessed for the special

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO. F.15
04/23/2024
benefits conferred on property from public improvements. Proposition 218 further requires that the City identify the benefits to each property, and then separate and quantify the special benefits from the general benefits to the public at large. Any costs associated with general benefits and benefit to property not within an assessment district must be funded by the City. Due to this requirement, the City conducted a benefit analysis of various improvement types to determine which properties benefit from each improvement and the City’s share of cost. In addition to continuing to fund operations and maintenance associated with the Brentwood Family Aquatic Center, the City anticipates contributing $2.15 million in Fiscal Year 2024/25 in order to fulfill the City’s benefit requirement for Fiscal Year 2024/25. This contribution amount is consistent with the amount contributed by the City in prior years to pay for the operation, maintenance, and replacement of public improvements associated with the LLADs and Citywide Park Maintenance District.

Additionally, each year the 1972 Act requires an annual review and an updated Engineer’s Report be prepared to set assessment rates each fiscal year. In addition, any new assessment districts, or any annexation of additional property into existing assessment districts also requires an Engineer’s Report to be generated. The annual Engineer’s Report for Landscape and Lighting Assessment District No. 19-3 is prepared under separate cover from the Consolidated Engineer’s Report for the Landscape and Lighting Assessment Districts due to the inclusion of multiple benefit zones within the assessment district. The annual Engineer’s Report for Landscape and Lighting Assessment District No. 21-1 is prepared under separate cover from the Consolidated Engineer’s Report for the Landscape and Lighting Assessment Districts due to the assessment being comprised of the following two components: 1) the Construction Component which provides funding for the construction of the new landscape improvements and will be assessed to property within LLAD No. 21-1 over a period of 10 years in equal annual installments with no interest, which commenced in Fiscal Year 2022-23 and ends after Fiscal Year 2031-32; and 2) the Maintenance Component which provides funding for the ongoing operation, maintenance, servicing, and replacement of the new landscape improvements, which commenced in Fiscal Year 2022-23 and will be assessed annually based on the maintenance budget each subsequent year.

The Preliminary Engineer’s Reports contains 1) plans and specifications for the improvements, 2) estimate of the costs of the improvements, 3) diagram of the assessment districts, 4) description of the method of apportionment of the costs of the improvements to the benefiting parcels, and 5) property list and assessment roll.

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO. F.15
04/23/2024
The Fiscal Year 2024/25 assessments in the Consolidated Preliminary Engineer’s Report for the Landscape & Lighting Assessment Districts, the Landscape and Lighting Assessment District No. 19-3 Preliminary Engineer’s Report, the Landscape and Lighting Assessment District No. 21-1 Preliminary Engineer’s Report, and the Citywide Park Maintenance District No. 98-1 Preliminary Engineer’s Report will be assessed on the Fiscal Year 2024/25 tax roll and are calculated by considering all anticipated expenditures for maintenance, utilities, and administration. The assessment rates may or may not change from fiscal year to fiscal year, dependent upon maintenance to be performed, but cannot exceed the maximum amount set when the districts were originally formed, plus an annual cost of living adjustment.

The cost-of-living adjustment for Fiscal Year 2024/25 is the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers in the San Francisco Bay Area from December 2022 to December 2023, which was 2.80%. This is applied to the maximum assessments in LLADs 94-1E, 94-1EC, 99-5, and 02-2 through 19-2, 21- 2, 21-3, 23-1, Landscape & Lighting Assessment District No. 19-3, the maintenance component of Landscape & Lighting Assessment District No. 21-1, and the Citywide Park Maintenance District No. 98-1. LLADs 94-1N, 94-1S, 95-2 through 99-4, and 99-6 through 01-1 have a maximum cost of living increase of 2% each fiscal year.

Twenty-two of the 67 LLADs and the Citywide Park Maintenance District No. 98-1 will be assessed at their Fiscal Year 2024/25 maximum authorized assessment rates.

As a part of the process, the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 requires that an Engineer’s Report must be filed, and a Public Hearing be held.

As noted in the Engineer’s Reports, the affected LLADs and Park District are as follows: No. 94-1 (Brentwood Country Club); No. 95-2 (Hawthorne Landing); No. 95- 3 (Pheasant Run); No. 95-4 (Diablo Estates); No. 95-5 (California Spirit and Glory); No. 95-6 (Gerry Ranch); No. 95-7 (SPA D); No. 95-8 (Garin Ranch); No. 97-1 (Brentwood Lakes); No. 97-2 (Marsh Creek Apartments); No. 97-3 (Brentwood Park Apartments); No. 98-3 (Solana); No. 98-4 (Birchwood Estates); No. 98-5 (Arroyo Seco); No. 99-3 (SPA ‘L’); No. 99-4 (California Grove); No. 99-5 (Deer Ridge Country Club); No. 99-6 (Trailside); No. 99-7 (Termo); No. 99-8 (Gerry Property); No. 99-9 (Richmond American); No. 00-2 (Lyon Woodfield); No. 00-3 (California Orchard); No. 00-4 (Brentwood Park); No. 01-1 (Laird Project); No. 02-2 (Oakstreet); No. 02- 3 (Apricot Way); No. 02-4 (Braddock & Logan); No. 02-5 (Sand Creek & Brentwood Blvd.); No. 02-6 (Balfour & John Muir); No. 02-7 (San Jose & Sand Creek); No. 02- 8 (Lone Tree); No. 02-9 (Balfour Plaza); No. 02-10 (Lone Tree Center); No. 02-11 (Lone Tree Plaza); No. 02-12 (Sunset Industrial); No. 02-13 (Stonehaven); No. 03- 2 (Meritage Lone Tree); No. 03-3 (Brookdale Court); No. 03-4 (Tri City Plaza); No.

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO. F.15
04/23/2024
03-5 (West Summerset); No. 03-6 (Arbor Village); No. 03-7 (Garin Ranch Commercial); No. 03-8 (Blackhawk Commercial); No. 04-2 (Balfour-Griffith Commercial); No. 05-2 (South Brentwood Blvd. Commercial), No. 06-2 (Palmilla); No. 06-3 (Vineyards); No. 06-4 (Villa Amador); No. 06-5 (Barrington); No. 11-1 (North Brentwood Boulevard); No. 14-1 (Mission Grove); No. 14-2 (Ferro-Ronconi); No. 15-1 (Bella Fiore); No. 15-2 (Renaissance Estates); No. 16-1 (Bond Lane); No. 16-2 (Sellers); No. 17-1 (Sparrow); No. 17-2 (Catching’s Ranch); No. 17-3 (Cornerstone Fellowship); No. 19-1 (Terrene); No. 19-2 (Alvernaz), No. 21-2 (Orchard Trails), No. 21-3 (Bennett Estates), No. 23-1 (Orchard Grove), No. 19-3 (Citywide and Local Maintenance Services), No. 21-1 (Deer Ridge Landscape Improvements),and the Citywide Park Maintenance District No. 98-1.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC INITIATIVE
Not Applicable.

PREVIOUS ACTION
Previous Action by the City Council is included on Attachment 1.

DATE OF NOTICE
Not Applicable.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
The City’s action is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The action consists of initiation of proceedings for the levying of annual assessments for landscape, lighting, and park maintenance purposes and is within certain classes of projects that have been determined not to have a significant effect on the environment in that it meets the criteria set forth in sections 15273 (Rates, Tolls, Fares, and Charges), 15301(c) (Existing Facilities), and 15306 (Information Collection) of the State CEQA Guidelines.

ALTERNATIVE OPTION(S)
Not approving these actions will result in the inability to file the Engineer’s Reports for Fiscal Year 2024/25, which is required by the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972. This act requires that an annual review and updated Engineer’s Report be

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO. F.15
04/23/2024
generated for any new assessment districts or any annexations into existing assessment districts.

ATTACHMENT(S)

1. Previous Action

2. Resolution

3. Preliminary Engineer’s Report LLADs

4. Preliminary Engineer’s Report LLAD No. 19-3 (Citywide & Local Maintenance Services)

5. Preliminary Engineer’s Report LLAD No. 21-1 (Deer Ridge Landscape Improvements)

6. Preliminary Engineer’s Report Citywide Park Maintenance District No. 98-1

ATTACHMENT 1 - PREVIOUS ACTION
Previous actions related to this agenda item that were taken by the Council are listed below. To view prior actions and materials, and Brentwood Municipal Code references in the staff report, as applicable:
 Visit www.brentwoodca.gov/meetings, and select the meeting date(s) desired to see the reference materials and videos.
 Visit www.brentwoodca.gov/municipalcode to research references to the Brentwood Municipal Code and search by the code section(s) cited.

Actions were taken in previous years to form the City’s existing 67 Landscape and Lighting Assessment Districts (“LLADs”) and Citywide Park Maintenance District.

Engineer’s Reports setting the annual assessment rates have been approved each year by the City Council prior to finalizing the property tax roll with Contra Costa County and levying assessments.

On March 23, 2021, by Resolution No. 2021-32, the City Council adopted a resolution approving and authorizing the City Manager or his/her designee to execute a Professional Services Agreement with Francisco & Associates, Inc. (“Francisco”) for a two-year term, in an amount not to exceed $229,900 per agreement year for assessment engineering services for Fiscal Years 2021/22 and 2022/23. In addition, the two-year agreement included an option to extend the agreement for two additional one-year terms.

On March 14, 2023, by Resolution No. 2023-25, the City Council adopted a resolution approving and authorizing the City Manager or his/her designee to execute an amendment with Francisco to extend the agreement for Fiscal Year 2023/24, for the first of the two allowable optional one-year terms in an amount not to exceed $229,900.

On March 26, 2024, by Resolution No. 2024-29, the City Council adopted a resolution approving and authorizing the City Manager or his/her designee to execute an amendment with Francisco to extend the agreement for Fiscal Year 2024/25, for the second of the two allowable optional one-year terms in an amount not to exceed $229,900.

RESOLUTION NO. 2024-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BRENTWOOD

DECLARING THE INTENTION TO ORDER IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE

LANDSCAPE & LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS, LANDSCAPE &
LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT No. 19-3, LANDSCAPE & LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT No. 21-1, AND THE CITYWIDE PARK
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 98-1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024/25; DECLARING THE INTENTION TO LEVY & COLLECT ASSESSMENTS; AND SETTING THE DATE OF MAY 28, 2024, AT 7:00 P.M. OR AT SUCH TIME THEREAFTER THAT

THE MATTER CAN BE HEARD FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING IN

ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THE STREETS & HIGHWAYS CODE “LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972” AND CALIFORNIA PROPOSITION NO. 218.

WHEREAS, the Landscape and Lighting Assessment Districts, encompassing the City of Brentwood’s existing 65 districts, Landscape and Lighting Assessment District No. 19-3, Landscape and Lighting Assessment District No. 21-1, and the Citywide Park Maintenance District No. 98-1, were previously established by the City Council and approved by the property owners; and
WHEREAS, the City has previously levied assessments on property in these Districts to pay for improvements therein; and
WHEREAS, as required by Section 22622 of the California Streets and Highways Code, the City Council of the City of Brentwood, by approval of Resolution of Initiation No. 2024-29, has described the proposed improvements to be included for the determination of annual assessments levied for the Landscape and Lighting Assessment Districts, Landscape and Lighting Assessment District No. 19-3, Landscape and Lighting Assessment District No. 21-1, and the Citywide Park Maintenance District No. 98-1 created under the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 and ordered Francisco & Associates, as the Engineer of Work, to prepare Engineer’s Reports to determine the annual levy of assessments for these districts; and WHEREAS, as required by Section 22623 of the California Streets and Highways Code, the Engineer of Work has filed Preliminary Engineer’s Reports for the Landscape and Lighting Assessment Districts, Landscape and Lighting Assessment District No. 19-3, Landscape and Lighting Assessment District No. 21-1, and the Citywide Park Maintenance District No. 98-1 for Fiscal Year 2024/25 with the City Clerk, in accordance with provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972.

NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brentwood that:

1. The recitals to this Resolution are true and correct and material to the adoption of this resolution.

2. The City’s action is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) as the action consists of initiation of proceedings for the levying of annual assessments for landscape, lighting, and park maintenance purposes and is within certain classes of projects that have been determined not to have a significant effect on the environment in that it meets the criteria set forth in sections 15273 (Rates, Tolls, Fares, and Charges), 15301(c) (Existing Facilities), and 15306 (Information Collection) of the State CEQA Guidelines.

3. It hereby declares the intention to order improvements for the Landscape & Lighting Assessment Districts, the Landscape and Lighting Assessment District No. 19-3, Landscape and Lighting Assessment District No. 21-1, and the Citywide Park Maintenance District No. 98-1 for Fiscal Year 2024/25 and declares the intention to levy and collect assessments in said Assessment Districts. Per Section 22624(c) of the California Streets and Highways Code, these Assessment Districts are generally located within the City of Brentwood City Limits. The Landscape & Lighting Assessment Districts are located throughout the City. The Landscape & Lighting Assessment District No. 19-3 is comprised of seventeen (17) zones of benefit throughout the City. The Landscape and Lighting Assessment District No. 21-1 is comprised of 1,118 parcels also known as the Deer Ridge development. The Citywide Park Maintenance District No. 98-1 includes all parcels within the City of Brentwood.

4. The improvements to be made in these assessment districts are generally described as the installation, operation, maintenance and servicing of parks, recreational, landscaping, irrigation, lighting and associated facilities and appurtenances located in and along arterial and collector streets and within other public areas as referenced in the Consolidated Preliminary Engineer’s Report for the Landscape & Lighting Assessment Districts for Fiscal Year 2024/25, the Landscape and Lighting Assessment District No. 19-3 Preliminary Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2024/25, the Landscape and Lighting Assessment District No. 21-1 Preliminary Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2024/25, and the Citywide Park Maintenance District No. 98- 1 Preliminary Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2024/25 on file with the City Clerk. All interested persons are referred to the Engineer’s Reports for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the various assessment districts and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the assessment districts.

5. Per Section 22624(f) of the California Streets and Highways Code, the following Landscape & Lighting Assessment Districts may be increased over the Fiscal Year 2024/25 assessment rates to account for an inflation adjustment, however they are not increased above the maximum assessment rate that was set when each District was created or subsequently ratified: No. 94-1 (Brentwood Country Club); No. 95-2 (Hawthorne Landing); No. 95-3 (Pheasant Run); No. 95-4 (Diablo Estates); No. 95-5 (California Spirit and Glory); No. 95-6 (Gerry Ranch); No. 95-7 (SPA D); No. 95-8 (Garin Ranch); No. 97-1 (Brentwood Lakes); No. 97-2 (Marsh Creek Apartments); No. 97-3 (Brentwood Park Apartments); No. 98-3 (Solana); No. 98-4 (Birchwood Estates); No. 98-5 (Arroyo Seco); No. 99-3 (SPA ‘L’); No. 99-4 (California Grove); No. 99-5 (Deer Ridge Country Club); No. 99-6 (Trailside); No. 99-7 (Termo); No. 99-8 (Gerry Property); No. 99- 9 (Richmond American); No. 00-2 (Lyon Woodfield); No. 00-3 (California Orchard); No. 00-4 (Brentwood Park); No. 01-1 (Laird Project); No. 02-2 (Oakstreet); No. 02-3 (Apricot Way); No. 02-4 (Braddock & Logan), No. 02-5 (Sand Creek & Brentwood Blvd.); No. 02-6 (Balfour & John Muir); No. 02-7 (San Jose & Sand Creek); No. 02-8 (Lone Tree); No. 02-9 (Balfour Plaza); No. 02-10 (Lone Tree Center); No. 02-11 (Lone Tree Plaza); No. 02-12 (Sunset Industrial); No. 02- 13 (Stonehaven); No. 03-2 (Meritage Lone Tree); No. 03-3 (Brookdale Court); No. 03-4 (Tri City Plaza); No. 03-5 (West Summerset); No. 03-6 (Arbor Village); No. 03-7 (Garin Ranch Commercial); No. 03-8 (Blackhawk Commercial); No. 04-2 (Balfour-Griffith Commercial); No. 05- 2 (South Brentwood Blvd. Commercial), No. 06-2 (Palmilla); No. 06-3 (Vineyards); No. 06-4 (Villa Amador); No. 06-5 (Barrington); No. 11-1 (North Brentwood Boulevard); No. 14-1 (Mission Grove); No. 14-2 (Ferro-Ronconi); No. 15-1 (Bella Fiore); No. 15-2 (Renaissance Estates); No. 16-1 (Bond Lane); No. 16-2 (Sellers); No. 17-1 (Sparrow); No. 17-2 (Catching’s Ranch), No. 17- 3 (Cornerstone Fellowship); No. 19-1 (Terrene), No. 19-2 (Alvernaz), No. 21-2 (Orchard Trails), No. 21-3 (Bennett Estates), No. 23-1 (Orchard Grove), No. 19-3 (Citywide and Local

Maintenance Services), No. 21-1 (Deer Ridge Landscape Improvements), and the Citywide Park Maintenance District No. 98-1.

6. On May 28, 2024, at 7:00 p.m., or at such time thereafter that the matter can be heard, it will conduct a Public Hearing on the levy of proposed annual assessments for each of the Assessment Districts for Fiscal Year 2024/25. The meeting and hearing will be held at the City Council Chambers, 150 City Park Way, Brentwood, California.

7. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to give the notice of public hearing required by the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 and Proposition 218.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Brentwood at a regular meeting held on the 23rd day of April 2024 by the following vote:

Consolidated Report for the City’s
Landscaping and Lighting
Assessment Districts
Fiscal Year 2024-25
Preliminary Engineer’s Report
April 23, 2024

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2024-25 TABLE OF CONTENTS
.
-iPage No.

City Directory..............................................................................................ii Certificates................................................................................................. iii SECTION I - Introduction ...........................................................................1 SECTION II - Impacts of Proposition 218 ...................................................2 SECTION III - Engineer’s Report................................................................3 Part A - Plans and Specifications.....................................................5 Part B - Estimate of Cost .................................................................9 Part C - Assessment District Diagram............................................11 Part D - Method of Apportionment of Assessment.........................13 Part E - Property Owner List & Assessment Roll ...........................66 Appendix A - Detailed Project Cost Breakdown
Appendix B - Assessment Roll

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2024-25 CITY DIRECTORY
.
-iiCITY OF BRENTWOOD

CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS AND CITY STAFF
FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
City Council Members
Joel R. Bryant
Mayor
Susannah Meyer Jovita Mendoza
Vice Mayor Council Member
Pa'tanisha Pierson Tony Oerlemans
Council Member Council Member
Tim Ogden
City Manager
Allen Baquilar Margaret Wimberly
City Engineer City Clerk
Kerry Breen Bruce Mulder
Director of Finance & Information Systems Director of Parks & Recreation Francisco & Associates
Assessment Engineer

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2024-25 CERTIFICATES
.
-iiiENGINEER'S REPORT

CITY OF BRENTWOOD
CONSOLDIATED REPORT FOR THE CITY’S

LANDSCAPE & LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS
Fiscal Year 2024-25
The undersigned, acting on behalf of Francisco & Associates, respectfully submits the enclosed Engineer’s Report as directed by the City of Brentwood City Council pursuant to the provisions of Article XIIID, Section 4 of the California Constitution, and provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (Section 22500 et. seq. of the California Streets and Highways Code). The undersigned certifies that he is a Professional Engineer, registered in the State of California.

Dated: March 28, 2024 By:

Eduardo Espinoza, P.E.

RCE No. 83709
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the Engineer's Report, together with the Assessment Roll and Assessment District Diagram thereto attached was filed with me on the ______ day of __________________, 2024.

Margaret Wimberly, City Clerk
City of Brentwood
Contra Costa County, California
By:

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer's Report, together with the Assessment Roll and the Assessment District Diagram thereto attached, was approved, and confirmed by the City Council of the City of Brentwood, Contra Costa County, California, on the day of ___________________, 2024.

Margaret Wimberly, City Clerk
City of Brentwood
Contra Costa County, California
By:

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION I
Fiscal Year 2024-25 INTRODUCTION
.
-1-

SECTION I

INTRODUCTION

ENGINEER'S REPORT

CITY OF BRENTWOOD
CONSOLIDATED REPORT FOR THE CITY’S

LANDSCAPE & LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS
Fiscal Year 2024-25
Background Information
To ensure the proper flow of funds for the ongoing operation, maintenance, and servicing of specific improvements within the boundaries of the City of Brentwood, the City Council, through the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, has previously approved the formation of sixty-seven (67) Assessment Districts, sixty-five (65) of which are summarized in this Report. The Annual Engineer’s Reports for Landscape and Lighting Assessment District No. 19-3 and Landscape and Lighting Assessment District No. 21-1 are prepared under separate covers due to the unique nature of the assessment districts. Improvements, which may be constructed, operated, maintained, and serviced by the Assessment Districts, include, but are not limited to:

Landscaping, street lighting, parks, open space facilities, trails, Contra Costa County Flood Control channel landscaping and associated appurtenant facilities.

Generally, developers construct these public improvements as conditions of approval for their permits for new housing or commercial/industrial developments. However, the ongoing operation, maintenance and servicing of these improvements are financed through the Assessment Districts. The formation of these Assessment Districts ensures that the operation, maintenance, and servicing of the improvements are specifically paid for by those property owners who directly benefit from the improvements.

Current Annual Administration
As required by the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, the Engineer's Report includes:
(1) a description of the improvements to be operated, maintained, and serviced by each Assessment District, (2) a cost estimate for each Assessment District, and (3) a listing of the proposed Fiscal Year 2024-25 assessments to be levied upon each assessable lot or parcel within each Assessment District.

The City of Brentwood will hold a Public Hearing on May 28, 2024, regarding these various Assessment Districts which will provide an opportunity for any interested person to be heard. At the conclusion of the Public Hearing, the City Council may adopt a resolution confirming the assessment rates as originally proposed or as modified.

Payment of these annual assessments for each parcel will be made in the same manner and at the same time as payments are made for their annual property taxes. All funds collected through the assessments must be placed in a special fund and can only be used for the purposes stated within this Report.

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION II
Fiscal Year 2024-25 PROPOSITION 218
.
-2-

SECTION II
IMPACTS OF PROPOSITION 218
Fiscal Year 2024-25
On November 5, 1996, California voters approved Proposition 218 entitled "Right to Vote on Taxes Act" which added Articles XIIIC and XIIID to the California Constitution. While its title refers only to taxes, Proposition 218 establishes new procedural requirements for the formation and administration of assessment districts.

These new procedures establish that even if assessments are initially exempt from Proposition 218, future increases in assessments must comply with the provisions of Articles XIIIC and XIIID of the California Constitution. However, if the increase in assessments were anticipated in the assessment formula (e.g., CPI increase or assessment cap) then the assessment would comply with the intent and provisions of Proposition 218.

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2024-25 ENGINEER'S REPORT
.
-3-

SECTION III

ENGINEER'S REPORT PREPARED PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972
SECTION 22500 THROUGH 22679

OF THE CALIFORNIA STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE
Pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California), and in accordance with the Resolution of Initiation, being Resolution No. 2024-29, which directs the preparation and filing of the Engineer’s Report, adopted by the City Council of the City of Brentwood, on March 26, 2024, and in connection with the proceedings for:

CITY OF BRENTWOOD
CONSOLIDATED REPORT FOR THE CITY’S

LANDSCAPE & LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS
Herein after referred to as the “District", I, Eduardo R. Espinoza, P.E., the duly appointed ENGINEER OF WORK, submit herewith the "Report" consisting of five (5) parts as follows:

PART A: PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
This part describes the improvements in each District. Plans and specifications for the improvements are as set forth on the lists thereof, attached hereto, and are on file in the Office of the Brentwood City Clerk and Engineering Department and are incorporated herein by reference.

PART B: ESTIMATE OF COST
This part contains an estimate of the cost of the proposed improvements, including incidental costs and expenses in connection therewith, is as set forth on the lists thereof, attached hereto, and is on file in the City’s Parks and Recreation Department.

PART C: ASSESSMENT DISTRICT DIAGRAM
This part incorporates by reference a diagram of the Consolidated Assessment Districts showing the exterior boundaries of each District, the boundaries of any zones within each District and the lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel of land within each District. The diagram has been prepared by the Engineer of Work and is on file in the Office of the Brentwood City Clerk and the Parks and Recreation Department. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within each District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the Contra Costa County Assessor for the year when this Report was prepared. The Assessor's maps and records are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Report.

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2024-25 ENGINEER'S REPORT
.
-4-
PART D: METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF ASSESSMENT
This part contains the method of apportionment of assessments, based upon parcel classification of land within each District, in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received.

PART E: PROPERTY OWNER LIST & ASSESSMENT ROLL
This part contains a list of the Contra Costa County Assessor’s Parcel numbers, and the net amount to be assessed upon the benefited lands within each District. The Assessment Roll is filed in the Office of the Brentwood City Clerk and is incorporated in this Report by reference. The list is keyed to the records of the Contra Costa County Assessor, which are incorporated herein by reference.

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2024-25 PART A
.
-5-
PART A

PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS

IMPROVEMENTS AND SERVICES
The improvements and services authorized by the provisions of the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, being Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, commencing with Section 22500 (hereafter referred to as the “1972 Act”), that may be applicable to these Districts and associated assessments may include one or more of the following definitions:
• “Improvement” means one or any combination of the following:
o The installation or planting of landscaping.
o The installation or construction of statuary, fountains, and other ornamental structures and facilities.
o The installation or construction of public lighting facilities, including, but not limited to, traffic signals.
o The installation or construction of any facilities which are appurtenant to any of the forgoing, or which are necessary or convenient for the maintenance or servicing thereof, including, but not limited to, grading, clearing, removal of debris, the installation or construction of curbs, gutters, walls, sidewalks, or paving, or water, irrigation, drainage, or electrical facilities. o The installation of park or recreational improvements, including, but not limited to all the following:
 Land preparation, such as grading, leveling, cutting and filling, sod, landscaping, irrigation systems, sidewalks, and drainage.  Lights, playground equipment, play courts, and public restrooms. o The maintenance or servicing, or both, of any of the forgoing, and of any improvements authorized below.
o The acquisition of land for park, recreational, or open space purposes. o The acquisition of any existing improvement otherwise authorized herein. o The acquisition or construction of any community center, municipal auditorium or hall, or similar public facility for the indoor presentation of performances, shows, stage productions, fairs, conventions, exhibitions, pageants, meetings, parties, or other group events, activities, or functions, whether those events, activities, or functions are public or private. • “Incidental expenses” include all the following:
o The costs of preparation of the report, including plans, specifications, estimates, diagram, and assessment.
o The costs of printing, advertising, and giving of published, posted, and mailed notices.
o Compensation payable to the county for collection of assessments. o Compensation of any engineer or attorney employed to render services in proceedings pursuant to this part.

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2024-25 PART A
.
-6-
o Any other expenses incidental to the construction, installation, or maintenance and servicing of improvements.
o Any expenses incidental to the construction, installation, or maintenance and servicing of the improvements.
o Any expenses incidental to the issuance of bonds or notes. o Costs associated with any elections held for the approval of a new or increased assessment.
• “Landscaping” means trees, shrubs, grass, or other ornamental vegetation. • “Maintain” or “maintenance” means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation, and services of any improvement, including:
o Repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement. o Providing for the life, growth, health, and beauty of landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing, or treating for disease or injury.
o The removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris, and other solid waste. o The cleaning, sandblasting, and painting of walls and other improvements to remove or cover graffiti.
• “Public lighting facilities” means all works or improvements used or useful for the lighting of any public places, including ornamental standards, luminaries, poles, supports, tunnels, manholes, vaults, conduits, pipes, wires, conductors, guys, stubs, platforms, braces, transformers, insulators, contacts, switches, capacitors, meters, communication circuits, appliances, attachments, and appurtenances. • “Service” or “servicing” means the furnishing of:
o Electric current or energy, gas, or other illuminating agent for any public lighting facilities or for the lighting or operation of any other improvements. o Water for the irrigation of any landscaping, the operation of any fountains, or the maintenance of any other improvements.

DESCRIPTION OF DISTRICT IMPROVEMENTS
The improvements, which have been constructed within the City of Brentwood, and those which may be subsequently constructed, will be operated, maintained, and serviced are generally described as follows:

The construction, operation, maintenance, servicing, and replacement of landscaping and street lighting located along arterial and local roadways, Grant Street Trail and other trail improvements, parks and recreational improvements, and appurtenant facilities including but not limited to; personnel, electrical energy, utilities such as water, materials, contractual services, and other items necessary for the satisfactory operation of these services and improvements as described below.

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2024-25 PART A
.
-7-
Street Lighting Improvements Along Arterial and Major Roadways Median and roadside streetlights located along arterial and major roadways in the City consist of, but are not limited to poles, fixtures, bulbs, conduits, equipment including guys, anchors, posts and pedestals, metering devices, utilities and other appurtenant facilities within the public rights-of-way and easements benefitting parcels within the boundaries of the Districts.

Landscaping Improvements Along Arterial and Major Roadways Median and roadside landscaping improvements located along arterial and major roadways in the City consist of, but are not limited to landscaping, irrigation, planting, shrubbery, ground cover, trees, pathways, hardscapes, walls, fences, utilities, and other appurtenant facilities required to provide landscaping within the public rights-of-way and easements benefitting parcels within the boundaries of the Districts.

Grant Street Trail Improvements
Grant Street Trail improvements consist of, but are not limited to landscaping, irrigation, planting, shrubbery, ground cover, trees, pathways, hardscapes, walls, fences, utilities, and other appurtenant facilities required to provide landscaping within the public rightsof-way and easements benefitting parcels within the boundaries of the Districts.

Park Improvements
Community and neighborhood parks and open space improvements in the City consist of, but are not limited to parks, open space, drainage areas, creeks, ponds, pathway materials, landscaping, trees, shrubbery, sidewalks, tot lots, park equipment, playgrounds, fences, etc. including the removal of trash and debris, and other appurtenant facilities within the public park areas, public rights-of-way, and easements benefitting parcels within the boundaries of the Districts.

In-Tract Street Lighting Improvements
In-tract streetlights located along and adjacent to in-tract roadways of each District consist of, but are not limited to poles, fixtures, bulbs, conduits, equipment including guys, anchors, posts and pedestals, metering devices, utilities and other appurtenant facilities within the public rights-of-way and easements benefitting parcels within the boundaries of the Districts.

In-Tract Landscaping Improvements
In-tract landscaping improvements located within or adjacent to the District consist of, but are not limited to landscaping, irrigation, planting, shrubbery, ground cover, trees, pathways, hardscapes, walls, monuments, fences, utilities, and other appurtenant facilities required to provide landscaping within the public rights-of-way and easements benefitting parcels within the boundaries of the Districts.

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2024-25 PART A
.
-8-
Contra Costa Flood Control Landscape Maintenance
Beginning in Fiscal Year 2000-01 and thereafter, certain Districts became responsible for increased landscape maintenance along the Contra Costa County Flood Control rightsof-way. For a more detailed description of the affected areas refer to the agreement between the City of Brentwood and the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District for Creeks, Trails, Landscaping, and Lighting.

Improvement diagrams have been prepared identifying all the improvements and areas that are to be maintained by the Districts. A copy of these diagrams is on file with the City Parks and Recreation Department.

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2024-25 PART B
.
-9-
PART B

ESTIMATE OF COST
The 1972 Act requires that a special fund be set up for the collection of revenues and expenditures of each District. The Act provides that the total cost of construction, operation, and maintenance and servicing of the public landscaping, street lighting, parks, trails, and open space improvements, etc. can be recovered by each District. Incidental expenses including administration of the Districts, engineering fees, legal fees and all other costs associated with the construction, operation and maintenance and servicing of the Districts can also be included.

Revenues collected from the assessments shall be used only for the expenditures represented above. A contribution to each District by the City may be made to reduce assessments as the City deems appropriate. Any balance remaining on July 1 at the end of the fiscal year must be carried over to the next fiscal year unless the funds are being accumulated for future capital improvements or operating reserves.

The table on the following page provides a summary of the estimated revenues and cost estimates for Fiscal Year 2024-25.

For a detailed breakdown of the revenues and cost estimates for each District please refer to both Appendix "A" in this report, and the City’s budget for Fiscal Year 2024-25.

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2024-25 PART B
.
-10-
District District Name
June 30, 2024
Fund Balance
available for
Operating
Reserves
Fiscal Year
2024-25
Expenditures
Fiscal Year
2024-25
Capital
Reserve
Contribution
Contribution
other than
Fiscal Year
2024-25
Assessment
Revenues
Fiscal Year
2024-25
Assessment
Revenue (1)
June 30, 2025
Fund Balance
available for
Operating
Reserves
94-1 Brentwood Country Club $42,759 ($1,070,790) ($4,135) $438,679 $636,246 $42,759 95-2 Hawthorne Landing $55,407 ($234,802) ($4,135) $118,943 $119,995 $55,407 95-3 Pheasant Run $289 ($10,558) $0 $3,824 $6,735 $289
95-4 Diablo Estates $14 ($10,009) $0 $3,711 $6,298 $14
95-5 California Spirit and Glory $56,678 ($299,917) ($3,422) $138,243 $165,096 $56,678 95-6 Gerry Ranch $11,701 ($57,182) ($341) $17,321 $40,203 $11,701 95-7 SPA D $18,120 ($200,086) ($2,741) $96,121 $115,873 $27,287 95-8 Garin Ranch $43,824 ($480,593) ($35,239) $256,857 $291,536 $76,385 97-1 Brentwood Lakes $50,868 ($460,602) ($5,303) $2,141 $463,765 $50,868 97-2 Marsh Creek Apartments $1 ($42,562) $0 $21,933 $20,630 $1 97-3 Brentwood Park Apartments $167 ($39,247) $0 $35,377 $3,871 $167 98-3 Solana $5,238 ($41,953) ($227) $6,656 $35,524 $5,238 98-4 Birchwood Estates $9,805 ($46,624) ($1,135) $20,639 $30,839 $13,524 98-5 Arroyo Seco $750 ($38,745) $0 $8,792 $29,954 $750
99-3 SPA L $141,564 ($811,549) ($16,249) $240,080 $587,718 $141,564 99-4 California Grove $8,732 ($64,227) ($632) $25,679 $41,934 $11,486 99-5 Deer Ridge Country Club $175,178 ($762,321) ($17,563) $7,358 $772,526 $175,178 99-6 Trailside $7,571 ($54,106) ($1,119) $27,933 $27,293 $7,571 99-7 Termo $58,631 ($223,594) ($2,660) $77,895 $148,360 $58,631 99-8 Gerry Property $4,437 ($61,463) ($324) $184 $61,604 $4,437 99-9 Richmond American $49,955 ($193,958) ($3,551) $34,759 $162,751 $49,955 00-2 Lyon Woodfield $2,244 ($53,223) ($486) $11,577 $43,293 $3,405 00-3 California Orchard $12,962 ($132,350) ($7,227) $663 $138,914 $12,962 00-4 Brentwood Park $28,344 ($150,736) ($3,924) $1,212 $153,449 $28,344 01-1 Laird Project $3,271 ($82,753) $0 $2,083 $80,670 $3,271 02-2 Oakstreet $119,283 ($488,526) ($69,776) $6,167 $552,136 $119,283 02-3 Apricot Way $158,962 ($1,206,394) ($32,478) $7,008 $1,231,865 $158,962 02-4 Bradock & Logan $11,443 ($54,979) ($1,151) $481 $55,650 $11,443 02-5 Sand Creek & Brentwood Boulevard $1,144 ($94,880) $0 $46 $94,835 $1,144 02-6 Balfour & John Muir $2,018 ($43,330) ($308) $2,856 $40,782 $2,018 02-7 San Jose & Sand Creek $174 ($98,936) $0 $7 $98,930 $174 02-8 Lone Tree $12 ($51,143) $0 $4,101 $47,043 $12
02-9 Balfour Plaza $1,170 ($6,959) $0 $47 $6,913 $1,170 02-10 Lone Tree Center $9 ($19,578) $0 $1,483 $18,096 $9 02-11 Lone Tree Plaza (Arcadia) $12 ($59,045) $0 $476 $58,570 $12 02-12 Sunset Industrial $8,536 ($66,869) ($4,184) $425 $70,628 $8,536 02-13 Stonehaven $629 ($24,493) ($65) $26 $24,532 $629
03-2 Meritage Lone Tree $198,126 ($1,389,996) ($58,408) $9,093 $1,439,311 $198,126 03-3 Brookdale Court $14,318 ($78,178) ($3,633) $645 $81,167 $14,318 03-4 Tri City Plaza $3 ($12,051) $0 $100 $11,951 $3
03-5 West Summerset $9,851 ($58,743) ($6,885) $532 $65,096 $9,851 03-6 Arbor Village $200 ($25,735) $0 $11,449 $14,286 $200 03-7 Garin Ranch Commercial $4 ($6,129) $0 $56 $6,073 $4 03-8 Blackhawk Commercial $46 ($31,132) $0 $2 $31,130 $46 04-2 Balfour-Griffith Commercial $3 ($6,865) $0 $173 $6,692 $3 05-2 South Brentwood Boulevard Commercial $313 ($16,302) $0 $9,230 $7,756 $997 06-2 Palmilla $56,379 ($398,767) ($21,341) $2,682 $417,426 $56,379 06-3 Vineyards $42,312 ($584,664) ($3,633) $1,765 $586,532 $42,312 06-4 Villa Amador $1 ($32,429) $0 $0 $32,430 $1
06-5 Barrington $80,122 ($535,490) ($13,119) $3,467 $545,142 $80,122 11-1 North Brentwood Boulevard $4,150 ($44,446) ($276) $17,004 $27,718 $4,150 14-1 Mission Grove $12,265 ($74,048) ($2,162) $534 $75,677 $12,265 14-2 Ferro-Ronconi $32,600 ($126,619) ($19,032) $1,685 $143,966 $32,600 15-1 Bella Fiore $2,416 ($77,739) ($1,190) $120 $78,809 $2,416 15-2 Renaissance Estates $2,859 ($12,414) ($2,494) $164 $14,744 $2,859 16-1 Bond Lane $17,670 ($82,208) ($10,116) $909 $91,416 $17,670 16-2 Sellers $18,461 ($106,017) ($5,068) $1,914 $109,172 $18,461 17-1 Sparrow $797 ($30,244) ($3,950) $111 $34,084 $797
17-2 Catchings Ranch $8,072 ($25,356) ($1,292) $349 $26,299 $8,072 17-3 Cornerstone Fellowship $1 ($6,810) $0 $0 $6,811 $1 19-1 Terrene $9,780 ($187,259) ($12,120) $634 $198,745 $9,780 19-2 Alvernaz $8,841 ($97,527) ($25,535) $864 $122,198 $8,841 21-2 Orchard Trails $43,576 ($123,615) $0 $1,866 $94,699 $16,526 21-3 Bennett Estates $5,624 ($19,270) $0 $225 $18,412 $4,991 23-1 Orchard Grove $0 ($5,003) $0 $0 $8,003 $3,000
(1) Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2024-25 PART C
.
-11-
PART C

ASSESSMENT DISTRICT DIAGRAM
The boundaries of each of the City of Brentwood’s Landscape & Lighting Districts are completely within the boundaries of the City of Brentwood. The consolidated Assessment Diagram for the sixty-five (65) Assessment Districts is on file in the Office of the City Clerk of the City of Brentwood and shown on the following page of this Report. The assessor’s parcel numbers (APN) and lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within each District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the Contra Costa County Assessor, for the year when this Report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Report.

14-2
02-11
03-8
99-9
94-1N
99-7
99-5
94-1E
00-2
95-6 95-7
02-11
02-12
02-3
02-2
02-6
97-2
02-10
94-1S
06-2
06-4
15-2 21-3
14-1
19-2
19-2
02-3
06-3
03-2
16-2
17-2
17-1
16-1
17-3
15-1
02-7
97-1
95-8
06-2
00-3
97-3
05-2
02-3
00-4
02-5
06-5
04-2
99-8
03-2
03-2
99-3
03-2
03-3
95-2 95-5
02-9
98-5
98-4
02-9
03-7
11-1
03-6
01-1
99-6
03-4 02-8
02-4
95-495-3
98-3
02-13
03-5
21-2
99-4
23-1
City of Brentwood
Landscape & Lighting Assessment Districts
± 2,000 1,000 0 2,000 4,000
Feet
LEGEND
Parcel Lines City Limit
Landscape and Lighting Assessment Districts (LLADs)
15-1
15-2
16-1
16-2
14-1
14-2
03-3
03-4
03-5
03-6
03-7
03-8
04-2
05-2
06-2
06-3
06-4
06-5
11-1
99-8
99-9
00-2
00-3
00-4
01-1
02-2
02-3
02-4
02-5
02-6
02-7
02-8
02-9
02-10
02-11
02-12
02-13
03-2
94-1
95-2
95-3
95-4
95-5
95-6
95-7
95-8
97-1
97-2
97-3
98-3
98-4
98-5
99-3
99-4
99-5
99-6
99-7
17-3
17-2
19-1
19-2
21-2
21-3
17-1
23-1

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2024-25 PART D
.
-13-
PART D

METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF ASSESSMENT
Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, permits the establishment of assessment districts by Agencies for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the operation, maintenance, servicing, and replacement of streetlights, landscaping, trails, open space, and park improvements.

Section 22573 of the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value.

This Section states:
"The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements.”
As a benefit-based assessment, parcels receiving benefit from improvements maintained by the Districts are subject to the assessment and will not be exempted if benefit is received. The improvements provided by these Districts and for which properties will be assessed have been identified as necessary, required and/or desired for the orderly development of the properties within each District to their full potential, consistent with the development plans and applicable portions of the City General Plan. As such, these improvements would be necessary and required of individual property owners for the development of such properties and the ongoing operation, servicing and maintenance of these improvements would be the financial obligation of those properties. Therefore, the improvements and the annual costs of ensuring the maintenance and operation of the improvements are a distinct and special benefit to the properties within the Districts. In addition, Article XIIID, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Because assessments are levied on the basis of benefit, they are not considered a tax, and therefore, are not governed by Article XIIIA of the California Constitution.

The 1972 Act permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement" (Sec. 22574). Thus, the 1972 Act requires the levy of a true "assessment" rather than a "special tax."
Article XIIID provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways (all of which are

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2024-25 PART D
.
-14-
typically not assigned an APN by the County), and that portion of public property that is not developed and used for business purposes similar to private commercial, industrial, and institutional activities (such as office buildings like a City Hall, etc.). Also exempted from the assessment would be utility rights-of-ways, common areas (such as in condominium complexes), and any other property that is deemed to be unable to develop by the City. These types of parcels do not benefit from the improvements.

QUANTIFICATION OF BENEFIT
Each District provides a funding source for the operation, maintenance, servicing and replacement of street lighting, landscaping, recreation/trail, and park improvements authorized under the statute and that benefit properties within the boundaries of each District.

In order for the City to separate out the general and special benefits for each improvement type, an analysis of each improvement was conducted. The analysis reviewed the purpose and users of each improvement, and then identified the properties that benefit from the improvement both within and outside the City and within and outside each District, and then allocated the costs to maintain, service, and replace each improvement type to each identified property.

Because general benefits are not assessable, any costs associated with general benefits or special benefits assigned to properties (both within and outside and the City) not in a District are to be paid for by the City. Only the costs associated with the special benefits conferred on property within each District from the authorized improvements are assessable, and therefore assessed herein. A summary of the analysis by improvement type is described below.

STREET LIGHTING ALONG ARTERIAL AND MAJOR ROADWAYS
Street lighting located along the City’s arterial and major roadways provides a benefit to parcels inside and outside the City. The benefits from streetlights are enhanced illumination which allows for:
• Safer vehicle and pedestrian access to and from property. • Enhanced deterrence of criminal or suspicious activity such as property theft, vandalism, criminal activity, illegal dumping, and damage to improvements and property.
• Improved ability of pedestrians and motorists to see. • Improved traffic circulation and reduced nighttime accidents and personal property loss.
• Increased nighttime visibility resulting in enhanced safety on roads, streets, and in public areas.

To determine which properties benefit from street lighting along the City’s arterial and major roadways a benefit analysis was performed. The analysis utilized Google Maps to determine which arterial and major roadways within the City were most likely to be used by property owners/residents when driving or walking to various destinations inside and outside of the City. The analysis showed that all properties within the City would utilize the

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2024-25 PART D
.
-15-
City’s arterial and major roadway system when traveling to destinations within the City or to other cities and communities. The analysis also found that there are additional properties located outside the City limits that would utilize the City’s arterial and major roadway system when traveling through the City to various destinations outside the City.

Vehicular or pedestrian traffic flow commencing outside of the City but traveling to a destination inside the City was determined to be a special benefit to the destination parcel within the City. The analysis used each parcel’s physical location as a starting destination and then selected ending destinations were inputted (e.g., neighboring cities or communities surrounding the City of Brentwood). If Google Maps showed the property owner/resident located outside the City would pass through and utilize the City’s arterial and major roadway system to travel to a destination outside of the City, then they were considered to receive a benefit from the City’s arterial and major roadway system. In addition, the analysis showed that most parcels outside of the City did not benefit from the improvements because they did not utilize the City’s roadways to travel to a destination parcel outside of the City, but would in most circumstances, if not all rather utilize Highway 4 to traverse the City or use an alternative route, therefore circumventing the City’s arterial and major roadways.

In addition to the special and direct benefits the property owners within the City receive from these enhanced street lighting improvements, there are also some incidental general benefits received by vehicular and pedestrian flow-through traffic (traffic that does not stop within the City) which originates from properties outside the City limits from individuals who use the City’s arterial and major roadway system to travel to another destination outside of the City. It has been determined that some properties not located within the City, north of the City limits, utilize arterial and major roadways within the City when traveling to destinations south of the City and that some properties not located within City, south and east of the City limits, utilize arterial and major roadways within the City when traveling to a destination north of the City. Properties meeting these criteria have been identified and such benefits must be accounted for and cannot be assessed to the properties within the Districts.

To quantify and separate the special benefits received by property owners within the City limits and the general benefit received by the property owners outside the City, Equivalent Dwelling Units (EDUs) were assigned to all benefitting properties (both inside and outside the City). The analysis resulted in a benefit boundary being drawn and EDUs being assigned to one of three categories of parcels: special benefits assigned to properties that lie within the City and not in a District, special benefits assigned to properties that lie within the City and in a District, and general benefits assigned to properties that lie outside the City.

It was determined that 2.81% of the EDUs were assigned to properties located outside of the City. Therefore, it is estimated that 97.19% of the annual cost to operate, maintain, service and replace the arterial and major roadway street lighting would be a special and direct benefit to the parcels within the City and 2.81% of the annual cost to operate, maintain, service and replace the arterial and major roadway street lighting would be a general benefit. However, only 75.84% of the total EDUs were assigned for special benefits to parcels in the City and in a District, therefore only 75.84% of the costs can be

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2024-25 PART D
.
-16-
allocated to parcels in Districts, and the remaining 24.16% of benefits (special benefits assigned to property in the City and not in a District and general benefits) will be paid by the City.

LANDSCAPING ALONG ARTERIAL AND MAJOR ROADWAYS
Landscaping located along the City’s arterial and major roadways provides a benefit to parcels within and outside the City. The benefits from landscaping include enhanced beautification which allows for:
• Enhanced desirability of property through association with the improvements. • Improved aesthetic appeal of properties providing a positive representation of the area and properties.
• Enhanced beautification to the adjacent developments. • Increased sense of pride in ownership of property within the Districts resulting from well-maintained improvements associated with the properties. • Enhanced quality of life through well-maintained green space and landscaped areas.
• Reduced criminal activity and property-related crimes (especially vandalism) against properties in the District through well-maintained surroundings and amenities including abatement of graffiti.
• Environmental enhancement through improved erosion resistance, dust and debris control, and fire prevention.
• Enhanced environmental quality of the parcels by moderating temperatures, providing oxygenation, and attenuating noise.

To determine which properties benefit from landscaping along the City’s arterial and major roadways a benefit analysis was performed. The analysis utilized Google Maps to determine which arterial and major roadways within the City were most likely to be used by property owners/residents when driving or walking to various destinations inside and outside of the City. The analysis showed that all properties within the City would utilize the City’s arterial and major roadway system when traveling to destinations within the City or to other cities and communities. The analysis also found that there are additional properties located outside the City limits that would utilize the City’s arterial and major roadway system when traveling through the City to various destinations outside the City.

Vehicular or pedestrian traffic flow commencing outside of the City but traveling to a destination inside the City was determined to be a special benefit to the destination parcel within the City. The analysis used each parcel’s physical location as a starting destination and then selected ending destinations were inputted (e.g., neighboring cities or communities surrounding the City of Brentwood). If Google Maps showed the property owner/resident located outside the City would pass through and utilize the City’s arterial and major roadway system to travel to a destination outside of the City, then they were considered to receive a benefit from the City’s arterial and major roadway system. In addition, the analysis showed that most parcels outside of the City did not benefit from the improvements because they did not utilize the City’s roadways to travel to a destination parcel outside of the City, but would in most circumstances, if not all rather utilize Highway 4 to traverse the City or use an alternative route, therefore circumventing the City’s arterial and major roadways.

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2024-25 PART D
.
-17-
In addition to the special and direct benefits the property owners within the City receive from these enhanced landscaping improvements, there are also some incidental general benefits received by vehicular and pedestrian flow-through traffic (traffic that does not stop within the City) which originates from properties outside the City limits from individuals who use the City’s arterial and major roadway system to travel to another destination outside of the City. It has been determined that some properties not located within the City, north of the City limits, utilize arterial and major roadways within the City when traveling to destinations south of the City and that some properties not located within City, south and east of the City limits, utilize arterial and major roadways within the City when traveling to a destination north of the City. Properties meeting these criteria have been identified and such benefits must be accounted for and cannot be assessed to the properties within the District.

To quantify and separate the special benefits received by property owners within the City limits and the general benefit received by the property owners outside the City, EDUs were assigned to all benefiting properties (both inside and outside the City). The analysis resulted in a benefit boundary being drawn and EDUs being assigned to one of three categories of parcels: special benefits assigned to properties that lie within the City and not in a District, special benefits assigned to properties that lie within the City and in a District, and general benefits assigned to properties that lie outside the City. It was determined that parcels within the categories that are not in a District benefit less than parcels within the Districts due to the proximity of the landscaping to the properties within the Districts. This finding resulted in the EDUs assigned to parcels in the City and not in a District and parcels outside the City being reduced by 50%.

It was determined that 1.63% of the EDUs were assigned to properties located outside of the City. Therefore, it is estimated that 98.37% of the annual cost to operate, maintain, service and replace the arterial and major roadway landscaping would be a special and direct benefit to the parcels within the City and 1.63% of the annual cost to operate, maintain, service and replace the arterial and major roadway landscaping would be a general benefit. However, only 86.23% of the total EDUs were assigned for special benefits to parcels in the City and in a District, therefore only 86.23% of the costs can be allocated to parcels in Districts, and the remaining 13.77% of benefits (special benefits assigned to property in the City and not in a District and general benefits) will be paid by the City.

GRANT STREET TRAIL
Grant Street trail provides special and direct benefits to the parcels located within a certain proximity to the trail. These special and direct benefits consist of enhanced recreational opportunities such as walking, jogging, biking, etc. within and along their developments.

These benefits allow for:
• Increases in options to exercise and incorporate recreational opportunities into daily routines.

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2024-25 PART D
.
-18-
• Increases in opportunities to travel and connect with places people may need or want to go.
• Enhanced environmental opportunities because of improvement in air quality due to people utilizing the trail verse driving to nearby destinations. • Specific enhancements in property values due to the increase in walkability of an area and the increase in amenities.

In addition, the trail provides general benefits to the public-at-large since this is a public trail system and anyone from the public can access it. To determine who was using the trail, City’s Parks and Recreation Department staff performed a trail user survey over multiple days at different times and locations along the trail over a three-month period.

Based upon their survey findings, ninety-three percent (93%) of the trail users were benefitting property owners located both within the City and those outside the City limits, who lived within a ½-mile (+/-) of the trail. Therefore, it is estimated that 93.00% of the annual cost to operate, maintain, service and replace the trail improvements would be a special and direct benefit to the parcels within the ½-mile radius (+/-) both within and outside the City and 7.00% of the annual cost to operate, maintain, service and replace the trail improvements would be a general benefit. Special benefits assigned to properties that lie within ½ mile (+/-) of the trail that are not within a District (in or outside the City), are special benefits that will be paid by the City because they cannot be assessed in the Districts. Only the benefits associated with properties within the City and within a District that are within the ½ distance (+/-) of the trail will be assessed to the Districts.

PARK FACILITES
The City of Brentwood’s General Plan policy is aimed at ensuring that recreational opportunities will continue to exist throughout the City and that an adequate park system continues to be developed and maintained to serve the City. In keeping with these policies, the City Council formed a Citywide assessment district for park maintenance in 1997 to secure a funding mechanism for a portion of the benefits and associated costs to maintain community parks and neighborhood parks. In addition, the Districts were also established to fund park costs associated with each benefiting property for the community and neighborhood parks that could not be funded from the Citywide Park District. For the purposes of this report, community parks are defined as typically being larger parks that are designed with amenities to serve the City as a whole as described further in the Parks, Trails and Recreation Master Plan originally approved on August 23, 1994 and subsequently approved on June 25, 2002. Neighborhood parks are defined as being generally smaller than community parks and typically benefit those residents located within a one-half mile radius from the park and as further defined within the Parks, Trails and Recreation Master Plan previously referenced.

There are 99 Parks spread throughout the City serving a population of approximately 65,000 residents. Community and neighborhood parks provide a special and direct benefit to the parcels within the City. The special and direct benefit to the parcels consists of enhanced recreational opportunities, including baseball, soccer, swimming, basketball, walking, jogging, etc. and the use of improvements such as: picnic tables, barbequing, playground equipment, community center rooms, green spaces, benches, bioswales, etc.

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2024-25 PART D
.
-19-
The parks and the associated recreational opportunities provide for more aesthetically pleasing neighborhoods, environmental and health benefits, community gathering places, and an overall improved and healthier community image, etc. If these park improvements were not installed, property within the Districts would not look as appealing to property owners, prospective property buyers, and patrons alike, which would adversely affect the value of their property. Based on the Parks and Economic Development Report published in the American Planning Association, homes adjacent and near parks and open space are typically valued at 8-20% higher than comparable properties, with positive price effect declining to zero about ½ mile away. Therefore, park improvements provide a special and direct benefit to property located within ½ miles of park improvements.

Furthermore, the Brentwood Parks, Trails, and Recreation Master Plan development guidelines as previously referenced herein, states that, neighborhood parks should service residents within a ½ mile +/- radius or approximately 1,000 to 2,000 people. The City maintains on average one neighborhood park per 800 residents. In addition to the special and direct benefits the property owners receive within the City from these enhanced park improvements, there are also some incidental benefits received by residents located from outside the City that may utilize the City’s community and neighborhood parks. Even though these are incidental benefits, they must be accounted for and cannot be assessed to the properties within the Districts.

Based on park user data, it is conservatively estimated that approximately 95% of the benefits associated with community parks are of benefit to property within the City and 98% of the benefits associated with neighborhood parks are of a special and direct benefit to properties within ½ mile distance (+/-). Therefore, 95% of the costs to annually operate, maintain, service and replace the community parks and 98% of the costs to annually operate, maintain, service and replace the neighborhood parks would be a special and direct benefit to the parcels within the City, and 5% and 2%, respectively of the annual costs to operate, maintain, service and replace the parks would be a general benefit.

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2024-25 PART D
.
-20-

LOCAL IN-TRACT STREET LIGHTING
To determine which properties benefit from in-tract or development specific street lighting a benefit analysis was performed. Street lighting located along and adjacent to the in-tract streets provides a special and direct benefit to parcels within the developments. The special and direct benefits from streetlights within the development consists of enhanced illumination which allows for safer vehicle and pedestrian access to and from property. In addition, this enhanced illumination helps deter criminal or suspicious activity such as property theft, vandalism, illegal dumping, etc.

Since the in-tract streets within the development are designed to have minimal flow through traffic, there are few reasons for vehicles to access the in-tract streets unless their destination is to or from a single-family residential parcel within the development.

However, it is reasonable to conclude that some vehicular traffic may on a rare occasion utilize the in-tract streets due to the need to turn around or a mistaken turn into the development. The rare circumstance where a pedestrian or vehicle mistakenly uses the in-tract streets, have been determined to be a rare and infrequent circumstance. Even though these are rare and infrequent circumstances, they must be accounted for and cannot be assessed to the properties within the Districts. Therefore, based on flow-through traffic it is conservatively estimated that approximately 98% of the annual trips along local in-tract roadways within the development would be a special and direct benefit to the parcels within the Districts and 2% of the annual trips along local in-tract roadways within the development would be a general benefit.

To quantify and separate the special benefits received by all property within the development EDUs were assigned to all benefitting properties inside the development as identified. It was determined that 2.00% of the cost to operate, maintain, service and replace the in-tract street lighting were assigned to properties located outside of the development. Therefore, it is estimated that 98.00% of the annual cost to operate, maintain, service and replace the in-tract street lighting would be a special and direct benefit to the parcels within each development and 2.00% of the annual cost to operate, maintain, service and replace the in-tract street lighting would be a general benefit.

LOCAL IN-TRACT LANDSCAPING
To determine which properties benefit from in-tract or development specific landscaping a benefit analysis was performed. Landscaping located along and adjacent to the in-tract streets provides a special and direct benefit to parcels within the development. The special and direct benefits from in-tract landscaping within the development consists of enhanced beautification to the entrances and along the roadsides within the development. Property owners who reside within these developments realize this enhanced aesthetic benefit when they are entering and exiting the development. If these in-tract landscape improvements were not installed, the developments would not look as appealing to property owners and prospective property buyers which would adversely affect the value of their property. Therefore, these landscape improvements provide a specific enhancement to their property values and not a general enhancement of property values.

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2024-25 PART D
.
-21-
Since the in-tract streets within the development are designed to have minimal flow through traffic, there are few reasons for vehicles to access the in-tract streets unless their destination is to or from a single-family residential parcel within the development.

However, it is reasonable to conclude that some vehicular traffic may on a rare occasion utilize the in-tract streets due to the need to turn around or a mistaken turn into the development. The rare circumstance where a pedestrian or vehicle mistakenly uses the in-tract streets, have been determined to be a rare and infrequent circumstance. Even though these are rare and infrequent circumstances, they must be accounted for and cannot be assessed to the properties within the Districts. Therefore, based on flow-through traffic it is conservatively estimated that approximately 98% of the annual trips along local in-tract roadways within the development would be a special and direct benefit to the parcels within the Districts and 2% of the annual trips along local in-tract roadways within the development would be a general benefit.

To quantify and separate the special benefits received by all property within the development EDUs were assigned was applied to all benefitting properties inside the development as identified. It was determined that 2.00% of the cost to operate, maintain, service and replace the in-tract landscaping were assigned to properties located outside of the development. Therefore, it is estimated that 98.00% of the annual cost to operate, maintain, service and replace the in-tract landscaping would be a special and direct benefit to the parcels within the development and 2.00% of the annual cost to operate, maintain, service and replace the in-tract landscaping would be a general benefit.

ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY
The total operation, maintenance and servicing costs for the landscaping, street lighting, parks, open space, and trail improvements are apportioned in accordance with a methodology that is consistent with standard assessment engineering practices. The specific method of apportioning the costs of the improvements to the benefiting parcels for each of the Districts is in accordance with the methodology developed and approved by the property owners at the time of each District’s formation.

As certain subdivisions have developed and continue to develop throughout the City of Brentwood, they may be annexed into an existing District or a new District may be created.

Each new subdivision is evaluated to determine which improvements are of a specific and direct benefit to the parcels within the subdivision and then a determination is made whether to annex them into an existing District or form a new District. The parcels, which benefit from the improvements, are then identified and a benefit assessment methodology is developed to allocate the costs of the improvements to the benefiting parcels.

As a benefit-based assessment, parcels receiving benefit from improvements maintained by the Districts are subject to the assessment and will not be exempted if benefit is received.

Since the assessments are levied on the owners of properties as shown on the secured property tax rolls, the final charges must be assigned by Assessor's Parcel Number. If assessments were to be allocated by parcel, not considering land use, benefit would not

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2024-25 PART D
.
-22-
be allocated accurately, because a single-family parcel would be paying the same as a 50-unit apartment parcel or a large commercial establishment. Therefore, as previously stated, the total assessment costs are allocated to each parcel of land based on the benefit received by each parcel. The assessment methodology is generally explained below and then in greater detail in each individual District’s methodology on the following pages.

The assessment methodology utilizes the EDU methodology as discussed below.

Single-Family Residential Parcels - The single-family residential parcel has been selected as the basic unit for the calculation of assessments since it represents approximately 90% of the parcels within the City. Therefore, the single-family residential parcel is defined as one (1.00) Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU) per parcel. The assessment methodology used to assign EDUs to other land uses in proportion to the special benefit they receive relative to the single-family residential parcel is discussed below.

Condominium, Townhome and Mobile Home Parcels - Condominiums, townhomes and mobile homes on average have approximately 75% of the building square footage compared to a single-family home. Furthermore, studies consistently show that these types of residential products impact public infrastructure approximately 75% as much as a single-family residential parcel. Therefore, all condominium, townhome and mobile home parcels are assessed 0.75 EDUs per parcel.

Multi-Family Residential Units - Multi-family residential units on average have approximately 50% of the building square footage compared to a single-family home.

Furthermore, studies consistently show that multi-family residential units impact public infrastructure approximately 50% as much as a single-family home. Therefore, all multifamily parcels are assessed 0.50 EDUs per unit.

Non-Residential Parcels - Commercial, industrial, institutional, and other non-residential properties are assessed at three (3) EDUs per acre of land. The 3.00 EDU per acre allocation is based upon the average size of a single-family parcel in the City of Brentwood which is approximately 1/6 of an acre. For every acre of non-residential land approximately 6 single-family homes could be constructed on that acre of land which would equate to

6.00 EDUs per acre. Furthermore, it was determined that Non-Residential parcels benefit less than residential properties from the authorized improvements because their employees have less time and opportunity to use and benefit from the improvements, than residents who live within the City. Employees typically benefit from or may use the improvements before work, during breaks and at lunch, or after work. Residents have the ability to use the improvements during the same times and on weekends and holidays, since they reside in the area. Based on this information, it is reasonable to assume that for non-residential property the opportunity to use and benefit from the improvements is approximately 50% of that realized by residential properties. Therefore, EDUs assigned to non-residential property are assessed three (3) EDUs per acre of land because they have been discounted by 50% to account for the differences in benefit from improvements conferred on residential and non-residential property.

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2024-25 PART D
.
-23-
Undeveloped Parcels – All undeveloped properties are assessed at 25% of the developed EDUs assigned for each parcel of land based on the properties land use classification.

Undeveloped properties benefit less from the improvements than developed property because undeveloped properties do not have structures which house residents or utilize employees. However, the improvements funded by the Districts do benefit undeveloped property because improvements have already been installed that allows for development to occur and to use the improvements immediately upon the initiation of development making the property more attractive. Based on this information, it is reasonable to assume that undeveloped property benefits less than developed property. To determine the difference in special benefit conferred on developed and undeveloped property, the Contra Costa County Assessor’s assessed values for property within the City were reviewed to determine what percentage of assessed value is typically associated with the underlying land and what percentage is typically associated with the structure. Based upon the review, it was determined that approximately 25% of the assessed value of developed property in the City is associated with the underlying land. Based on the comparison of benefits of developed property to undeveloped property it is reasonable to assess the undeveloped property at 25% of the rate for developed property. Therefore, EDUs assigned to undeveloped residential and non-residential property have been discounted by 75% to account for the differences in benefit from improvements conferred on developed and undeveloped property.

Exempt Parcels - Publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the improvements. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways (all of which are typically not assigned an APN by the County), and that portion of public property that is not developed and used for business purposes similar to private commercial, industrial, and institutional activities (such as office buildings like a City Hall, etc.). Also exempted from the assessment would be utility rights-of-ways, common areas (such as in condominium complexes), and any other property that is deemed to be unable to develop by the City. These types of parcels do not benefit from the improvements. Also exempted from the assessments are private streets, utility easements, HOA common areas (except club houses, community centers, parking lots, etc.) and any other parcels that do not receive a special and direct benefit from the improvements.

Furthermore, parcels within each District may be assessed as developed once the final maps have been approved by the City of Brentwood and or it is anticipated that improvements will need to be maintained or reserve funds will need to be collected for the ensuing fiscal year.

Adjustment of Assessments
Any property owner who demonstrates that the amount of their assessment is in error as a result of incorrect information being used to apply the foregoing method of spread, may file a written appeal with the Director of Parks and Recreation. Any such appeal is limited to correction of an assessment during the then current or, if before July 1, the upcoming

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2024-25 PART D
.
-24-
fiscal year. Upon the filing of any such appeal, the Director of Parks and Recreation shall promptly review the information provided by the property owner and if he/she finds that the assessment should be modified, the Director of Parks and Recreation shall have the authority to make the appropriate changes in the assessment roll. If any such changes are approved after the assessment roll has been filed with the County for collection, the Director of Parks and Recreation is authorized to refund to the property owner the amount of any approved reduction if the District reserve is adequate. Claims against the City for adjustments not granted by the Director of Parks and Recreation shall be governed by the City’s written claim procedures under the Tort Claims Act (Government Code Section 810 and following).

Following is a listing of the various Districts, their corresponding number and type of parcels/units/acres within each District, Fiscal Year 2024-25 maximum assessment rates, and Fiscal Year 2024-25 applied assessment rates along with the amount proposed to be assessed and placed on the Contra Costa County secured property tax roll. The amount to be assessed was determined by taking into account general benefits and any other contributions by the City. The amount to be assessed is then divided by the applicable number of EDUs as defined herein to calculate the applied Fiscal Year 2024-25 assessment rate. Under no circumstance may a District levy an amount that exceeds the maximum assessment rate for the applicable fiscal year.

Assessment District 94-1 North, South, East, East-Com (Brentwood Country Club) - Subdivisions 6848, 7642, 7816, 7869, 7870, 7871, 7872, 7873, 7939, 7940, 8017, 8022, 8081, 8082, 8083, 8084, 8085, 8088, 8089, 8462, & DR01-34. DR04-34 was annexed in Fiscal Year 2006-07.

Assessment District No. 94-1 was formed in 1994, has four (4) zones of benefit, and is comprised of 839 single-family residential parcels, one vacant single-family parcel, and one institutional parcel north of Balfour (NORTH); 1,336 single-family residential parcels and two commercial parcels south of Balfour (SOUTH); 329 single-family residential parcels south of Balfour and east of Fairview (EAST); and 11 commercial parcels located at the south and northeast corner of Balfour and Fairview (EASTCOM).

Single family parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel. Commercial parcels are assessed at 3.00 EDUs/acre.

This Assessment District set maximum assessment rates per equivalent dwelling unit (EDU) for both the NORTH and SOUTH zones with an allowance for a 2% increase each fiscal year.

The Zone EAST-COM was annexed in Fiscal Year 2003-04 for commercial property.

The maximum assessment rate established at formation included maintenance of certain areas that are currently maintained by the property owner, however if the property owner fails to maintain their landscaping improvements to City of Brentwood standards, then the maximum assessment rate was thought to be set high enough for the City to step in and maintain the improvements and assess the property owner for these costs. The assessment rate has been set under the assumption that the property

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2024-25 PART D
.
-25-
owner will continue to maintain these specific improvements and the City will maintain all other intended improvements as identified at the time of annexation.

Zones EAST and EAST-COM also have an allowance for a minimum of 2% CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year of June 30, 2003).

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved. In Fiscal Year 2024-25 there are 860.21 EDUs in NORTH Zone; 1,353.66 EDUs in SOUTH Zone; 329.00 EDUs in EAST Zone; and 52.62 EDUs in EAST-COM Zone that are assessable and the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $636,246 (as shown in Appendix A).

Therefore, the current assessment rates for Fiscal Year 2024-25 are as follows:
• parcels NORTH of Balfour are $242.65/EDU.
• parcels SOUTH of Balfour are $201.40/EDU.
• parcels EAST of Fairview are $413.46/EDU.
• parcels EAST COM of Fairview are $358.61/EDU.

Assessment District 95-2 (Hawthorn Landing) - Subdivision 7369, 8066, 8242 & 8371 (8608).

Assessment District No. 95-2 is comprised of 323 single-family residential parcels.

This Assessment District was formed in 1995 and the maximum assessment rate was set with an allowance for a 2% increase each fiscal year. Single-family parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved. In Fiscal Year 2024-25 there are 323.00 EDU that are assessable. In Fiscal Year 2024-25 the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $119,995 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $371.50/EDU
Fiscal Year 2024-25 Rate: $371.50/EDU

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2024-25 PART D
.
-26-
Assessment District 95-3 (Pheasant Run) - Subdivision 7349.

Assessment District No. 95-3 is comprised of 26 single-family residential parcels. This Assessment District was formed in 1995 and the maximum assessment rate was set with an allowance for a 2% increase each fiscal year. Single-family parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel.

In Fiscal Year 1997-98 the property owners within Assessment District No. 95-3 elected to operate and maintain their improvements through the establishment of a Homeowner Association. In Fiscal Year 2024-25 it is anticipated that all local improvements will be maintained through the Homeowners Association. However, the parcels will be assessed for citywide improvements and the capital replacement costs associated with the public improvements. In Fiscal Year 2024-25 there are 26.00 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed within the Assessment District is $6,735 (as shown in Appendix A). If the homeowner association fails to properly operate and maintain the improvements within Assessment District No. 95-3, the City Council has the discretion to levy assessments up to the authorized maximum assessment rate.

Maximum Rate: $429.45/EDU
Fiscal Year 2024-25 Rate: $259.02/EDU
Assessment District 95-4 (Diablo Estates) - Subdivision 7272.

Assessment District No. 95-4 is comprised of 26 single-family residential parcels. This Assessment District was formed in 1995 and the maximum assessment rate was with an allowance for a 2% increase each fiscal year. Single-family parcels are assessed at

1.00 EDU/parcel.

In Fiscal Year 1999-00 the property owners within Assessment District No. 95-4 elected to operate and maintain their improvements through the establishment of a Homeowner Association. In Fiscal Year 2024-25 it is anticipated that all local improvements will be maintained through the Homeowners Association. However, the parcels will be assessed for citywide improvements and the capital replacement costs associated with the public improvements. In Fiscal Year 2024-25 there are 26.00 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed within the Assessment District is $6,298 (as shown in Appendix A). If the Homeowner Association fails to properly operate and maintain the improvements within Assessment District No. 95-4, the City Council has the discretion to levy assessments up to the authorized maximum assessment rate.

Maximum Rate: $438.44/EDU
Fiscal Year 2024-25 Rate: $242.25/EDU

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2024-25 PART D
.
-27-
Assessment District 95-5 (California Spirit and Glory) - Subdivisions 7736, 7802, 8383, & 8411.

Assessment District No. 95-5 is comprised of 486 single-family residential parcels.

This Assessment District was formed in 1995 and the maximum assessment rate was with an allowance for a 2% increase each fiscal year. Single-family parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved. In Fiscal Year 2024-25 there are 486.00 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $165,096 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $339.70/EDU
Fiscal Year 204-25 Rate: $339.70/EDU
Assessment District 95-6 (Gerry Ranch) - Subdivisions 7059 & 7915.

Assessment District No. 95-6 is comprised of 88 single-family residential parcels. This Assessment District was formed in 1995 and the maximum assessment rate was set with an allowance for a 2% increase each fiscal year. Single-family parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved. In Fiscal Year 2024-25 there are 88.00 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $40,203 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $456.84/EDU
Fiscal Year 2024-25 Rate: $456.84/EDU

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2024-25 PART D
.
-28-
Assessment District 95-7 (SPA ‘D’) - Subdivisions 7948, 7950, 7995, 8011 & CUP00-

06. Assessment District No. 95-7 is comprised of 373 single-family residential parcels and a 3.187-acre commercial parcel. This Assessment District was formed in 1995 and the maximum assessment rate was set with an allowance for a 2% increase each fiscal year. Single-family parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel and commercial parcels are assessed at 3.00 EDUs/acre.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved. In Fiscal Year 2024-25 there are 382.56 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $115,873 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $302.89/EDU
Fiscal Year 2024-25 Rate: $302.89/EDU
Assessment District 95-8 (Garin Ranch) - Subdivisions 7798, 7799, 8009, 8010, 8138, 8221, 8222, 8425, 8537 & 8609. Subdivisions 8426, 8627, & 8840 were Annexed MidYear Fiscal Year 2003-04.

Assessment District No. 95-8 is comprised of 854 single-family residential parcels. This Assessment District was formed in 1995 and the maximum assessment rate was set with an allowance for a 2% increase each fiscal year. Single-family parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel and vacant single-family parcels are assessed at 0.25 EDU/parcel.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved. In Fiscal Year 2024-25 there are 854.00 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $291,536 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $341.38/EDU
Fiscal Year 2024-25 Rate: $341.38/EDU

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2024-25 PART D
.
-29-
Assessment District 97-1 (Brentwood Lakes) - Subdivisions 7705, 8063, 8209, 8210, 8305, 8322, 8373, 8374, 8375 & 8659 (8344) and DR04-37 was annexed in Fiscal Year 2006-07.

Assessment District No. 97-1 is comprised of 922 single-family residential parcels and four commercial parcels. This Assessment District was formed in 1997 and the maximum assessment rate was set with an allowance for a 2% increase each fiscal year. Single-family parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel, and commercial parcels are assessed at 3.00 EDU/acre.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved. In Fiscal Year 2024-25 there are 941.55 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $463,765 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $493.66/EDU
Fiscal Year 2024-25 Rate: $492.56/EDU
Assessment District 97-2 (Marsh Creek Apartments) – MS 355-96.

Assessment District No. 97-2 is comprised of one multi-family residential parcel consisting of 126 apartment units. This Assessment District was formed in 1997 and the maximum assessment rate was set with an allowance for a 2% increase each fiscal year.

In Fiscal Year 2001-02 the property owners within Assessment District No. 97-2 elected to operate and maintain their improvements through a property management association. In Fiscal Year 2024-25 it is anticipated that all local improvements will be maintained through the property management association. However, the parcel will be assessed for citywide improvements and the capital replacement costs associated with the public improvements. In Fiscal Year 2024-25 there are 63.00 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed within the Assessment District is $20,630 (as shown in Appendix A). If the property management association fails to properly operate and maintain the improvements within Assessment District No. 97-2, the City Council has the discretion to levy assessments up to the authorized maximum assessment rate.

Maximum Rate: $476.84/EDU
Fiscal Year 2024-25 Rate: $327.46/EDU

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2024-25 PART D
.
-30-
Assessment District 97-3 (Brentwood Park Apartments) – MS 361-97.

Assessment District No. 97-3 is comprised of two multi-family residential parcels consisting of 160 apartment units. This Assessment District was formed in 1997 and the maximum assessment rate was set with an allowance for a 2% increase each fiscal year.

In Fiscal Year 2002-03 the property owners within Assessment District No. 97-3 elected to operate and maintain their improvements. In Fiscal Year 2024-25 it is anticipated that all local improvements will be maintained by the property owner. However, the parcels will be assessed for citywide improvements and the capital replacement costs associated with the public improvements. In Fiscal Year 2024-25 there are 80.00 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed within the Assessment District is $3,871 (as shown in Appendix A). If the apartment complex fails to properly operate and maintain the improvements within Assessment District No. 97-3, the City Council has the discretion to levy assessments up to the authorized maximum assessment rate.

Maximum Rate: $68.28/EDU
Fiscal Year 2024-25 Rate: $48.38/EDU
Assessment District 98-3 (Solana) - Subdivision 6811.

Assessment District No. 98-3 is comprised of 82 single-family residential parcels. This Assessment District was formed in 1998 and the maximum assessment rate was with an allowance for a 2% increase each fiscal year. Single-family parcels are assessed at

1.00 EDU/parcel.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved. In Fiscal Year 2024-25 there are 82.00 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $35,524 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $433.21/EDU
Fiscal Year 2024-25 Rate: $433.21/EDU

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2024-25 PART D
.
-31-
Assessment District 98-4 (Birchwood Estates) - Subdivision 8048.

Assessment District No. 98-4 is comprised of 51 single-family residential parcels. This Assessment District was formed in 1998 and the maximum assessment rate was set with an allowance for a 2% increase each fiscal year. Single-family parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved. In Fiscal Year 2024-25 there are 51.00 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $30,839 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $604.69/EDU
Fiscal Year 2024-25 Rate: $604.69/EDU
Assessment District 98-5 (Arroyo Seco) - Subdivision 7476.

Assessment District No. 98-5 is comprised of 65 single-family residential parcels. This Assessment District was formed in 1998 and the maximum assessment rate was set with an allowance for a 2% increase each fiscal year. Single family parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved. In Fiscal Year 2024-25 there are 65.00 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $29,954 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $460.82/EDU
Fiscal Year 2024-25 Rate: $460.82/EDU

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2024-25 PART D
.
-32-
Assessment District 99-3 (Spa ‘L’) - Subdivisions 8033, 8055, 8069, 8146, 8147, 8172, 8176, 8178, 8195, 8196, 8197, 8225, 8395, 8697, 8460, & 8453. Subdivision 8529 was annexed in Fiscal Year 2004-05 & Subdivision 8808 was annexed in Fiscal Year 2005-06.

Assessment District No. 99-3 is comprised of 985 single-family residential parcels and two vacant single-family residential parcels. This Assessment District was formed in Fiscal Year 1999-00 and the maximum assessment rate was set with an allowance for a 2% increase each fiscal year. Single-family parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel and vacant single-family properties are assessed at 0.25 EDU/parcel.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved. In Fiscal Year 2024-25 there are 986.25 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $587,718 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $595.91/EDU
Fiscal Year 2024-25 Rate: $595.91/EDU
Assessment District 99-4 (California Grove) - Subdivision 8046.

Assessment District No. 99-4 is comprised of 72 single-family residential parcels. This Assessment District was formed in Fiscal Year 1999-00 and the maximum assessment rate was set with an allowance for a 2% increase each fiscal year. Single-family parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved. In Fiscal Year 2024-25 there are 72.00 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $41,934 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $582.40/EDU
Fiscal Year 2024-25 Rate: $582.40/EDU

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2024-25 PART D
.
-33-
Assessment District 99-5 (Deer Ridge Country Club) – Subdivisions 8253, 8478, 8479, 8480, 8481, 8482, 8483, 8484, 8485, 8486, 8488, 8829, 8490, 8489, 8491, 8492, 8493, 8494, 8495, 8277, 8278, & 8545. Subdivision 8352 was annexed mid-year Fiscal Year 2002-03.

Assessment District No. 99-5 is comprised of 1,056 single-family residential parcels, one commercial parcel, and one institutional parcel totaling 8.68 acres. This Assessment District was formed in Fiscal Year 1999-00; however, the maximum assessment rate was increased through a ballot process in Fiscal Year 2002-03 with an allowance for a minimum of a 2% CPI increase each fiscal year. The CPI increase is based upon the annual change in the Consumer Price Index for the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners as of (base year June 30, 2002). Single-family parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel, and commercial/institutional parcels are assessed at 3.00 EDUs/acre.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved. In Fiscal Year 2024-25 there are 1,082.04 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $772,526 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $959.28/EDU
Fiscal Year 2024-25 Rate: $713.95/EDU
Assessment District 99-6 (Trailside) - Subdivision 7975.

Assessment District No. 99-6 is comprised of 68 single-family residential parcels. This Assessment District was formed in Fiscal Year 1999-00 and the maximum assessment rate was set with an allowance for a 2% increase each fiscal year. Single-family parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved. In Fiscal Year 2024-25 there are 68.00 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $27,293 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $401.36/EDU
Fiscal Year 2024-25 Rate: $401.36/EDU

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2024-25 PART D
.
-34-
Assessment District 99-7 (Termo) - Subdivisions 7882 & 8676.

Assessment District No. 99-7 is comprised of 277 single-family residential parcels.

This Assessment District was formed in Fiscal Year 1999-00 and the maximum assessment rate was set with an allowance for a 2% increase each fiscal year. Singlefamily parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved. In Fiscal Year 2024-25 there are 277.00 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $148,360 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $535.59/EDU
Fiscal Year 2024-25 Rate: $535.59/EDU
Assessment District 99-8 (Gerry Property) - Subdivisions 7844 & 8180. Conditional Use Permit 06-37 was annexed in Fiscal Year 2008-09.

Assessment District No. 99-8- is comprised of 137 single-family residential parcels and one parcel that has a Conditional Use Permit 06-37 which is within residentially zoned property and has a Contra Costa County use code designation of single family. This Assessment District was formed in Fiscal Year 1999-00 and the maximum assessment rate was set with an allowance for a 2% increase each fiscal year. Single-family parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved. In Fiscal Year 2024-25 there are 137.00 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $61,604 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $594.84/EDU
Fiscal Year 2024-25 Rate: $449.66/EDU

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2024-25 PART D
.
-35-
Assessment District 99-9 (Richmond American) - Subdivisions 7474, 8170, 8368 & 8369.

Assessment District No. 99-9 is comprised of 245 single-family residential parcels.

This Assessment District was formed in Fiscal Year 1999-00 and the maximum assessment rate was set with an allowance for a 2% increase each fiscal year. Singlefamily parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved. In Fiscal Year 2024-25 there are 245.00 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $162,751 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $664.29/EDU
Fiscal Year 2024-25 Rate: $664.29/EDU
Assessment District 00-2 (Lyon Woodfield) - Subdivision 6665.

Assessment District No. 00-2 is comprised of 81 single-family residential parcels. This Assessment District was formed in Fiscal Year 2000-01 and the maximum assessment rate was with an allowance for a 2% increase each fiscal year. Single family parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved. In Fiscal Year 2024-25 there are 81.00 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $43,293 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $654.92/EDU
Fiscal Year 2024-25 Rate: $534.48/EDU

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2024-25 PART D
.
-36-
Assessment District 00-3 (California Orchard) - Subdivisions 8199, 8200, 8342, DR00- 36, DR00-27, & DR04-12.

Assessment District No. 00-3 is comprised of 265 single family parcels and 7 commercial developments entailing 5.027 acres. This Assessment District was formed in Fiscal Year 2000-01 and the maximum assessment rate was set with an allowance for a 2% increase each fiscal year. Single-family parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel and commercial properties are assessed at 3.00 EDUs/acre.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved. In Fiscal Year 2024-25 there are 280.08 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $138,914 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $522.57/EDU
Fiscal Year 2024-25 Rate: $495.98/EDU
Assessment District 00-4 (Brentwood Park) - Subdivisions 8226 & 8402.

Assessment District No. 00-4 is comprised of 245 single-family residential parcels.

This Assessment District was formed in Fiscal Year 2000-01 and the maximum assessment rate was set with an allowance for a 2% increase each fiscal year. Singlefamily parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved. In Fiscal Year 2024-25 there are 245.00 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $153,449 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $1,071.64/EDU
Fiscal Year 2024-25 Rate: $626.32/EDU

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2024-25 PART D
.
-37-
Assessment District 01-1 (Laird Project) - Subdivision 8416.

Assessment District No. 01-1 is comprised of 133 single-family residential parcels.

This Assessment District was formed in Fiscal Year 2001-02 and the maximum assessment rate was set with an allowance for a 2% increase each fiscal year. Single family parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved. In Fiscal Year 2024-25 there are 133.00 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $80,670 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $606.54/EDU
Fiscal Year 2024-25 Rate: $606.54/EDU
Assessment District 02-2 (Oakstreet) - Subdivision 8413, 8424, a multi-family parcel of 9 units & DR03-02 (Senior Apts.). Subdivision 8574 was annexed in Fiscal Year 2003-04 and Subdivisions 8534 & 8825 were annexed in Fiscal Year 2004-05.

Assessment District No. 02-2 is comprised of 599 single-family residential parcels, one parcel with 80 senior living apartments and one institutional parcel totaling 0.75 acres.

This Assessment District was formed in Fiscal Year 2002-03 and the maximum assessment rate was set with an allowance for a CPI increase each fiscal year. Singlefamily parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel, the senior living apartments/multifamily units are assessed at 0.50 EDUs/unit and institutional parcels are assessed at

3.00 EDUs/acre. These assessments will continue to have an allowance for a CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year June 30, 2002).

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved. In Fiscal Year 2024-25 there are 641.25 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $552,136 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $1,571.61/EDU
Fiscal Year 2024-25 Rate: $861.03/EDU

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2024-25 PART D
.
-38-
Assessment District 02-3 (Apricot Way) - Subdivisions 8408, & 8469. Subdivisions 8470, 8912 & 8603 were annexed Fiscal Year 2003-04. Subdivisions 8556, 8557, 8601, 8281, 8831, 8849, and DR02-11 were annexed mid-year of Fiscal Year 2003-04.

Subdivisions 8663, 8763, & 8701 were annexed in Fiscal Year 2005-06. Minor Subdivision 365-05 was annexed in Fiscal Year 2006-07. Minor Subdivision 354-04 was annexed midyear of Fiscal Year 2006-07. Subdivision 8982 was annexed in Fiscal Year 2007-08. The residential portion of Subdivision 8506 was annexed Fiscal Year 2008-09.

Assessment District No. 02-3 is comprised of 1,077 single-family residential parcels, 13 vacant single-family residential parcels and three parcels totaling 179 apartment units. This Assessment District was formed in Fiscal Year 2002-03 and the maximum assessment rate was increased in Fiscal Year 2003-04 through a ballot process with an allowance for a CPI increase each fiscal year. Single-family parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel and vacant single- family parcels are assessed at 0.25 EDU/parcel.

Apartment complexes are assessed at 0.50 EDU/unit. These assessments will continue to have an allowance for a CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year June 30, 2003).

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved. In Fiscal Year 2024-25 there are 1,169.75 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $1,231,865 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $2,633.07/EDU
Fiscal Year 2024-25 Rate: $1,053.10/EDU
Assessment District 02-4 (Bradock & Logan) - Subdivision 8421.

Assessment District No. 02-4 is comprised of 56 single-family residential parcels. This Assessment District was formed in Fiscal Year 2002-03 and the maximum assessment rate was set with an allowance for a CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year June 30, 2002). Single-family parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved. In Fiscal Year 2024-25 there are 56.00 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $55,650 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $1,047.34/EDU
Fiscal Year 2024-25 Rate: $993.74/EDU

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2024-25 PART D
.
-39-
Assessment District 02-5 (Sand Creek & Brentwood Boulevard) – 8671 (MS352-01), 8894, DR99-16, & CUP01-03. DR04-26 was annexed in Fiscal Year 2006-07, and DR05- 16 was annexed mid-year Fiscal Year 2006-07.

Assessment District No. 02-5 is comprised of 27.73 acres of institutional, industrial, commercial, and vacant commercial properties and 120 condominium parcels. This Assessment District was formed in Fiscal Year 2002-03 and the maximum assessment rate was set with an allowance for a CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year June 30, 2002). Condominium parcels are assessed at 0.75 EDUs/unit, commercial and industrial parcels are assessed 3.00 EDUs/acre and vacant commercial parcels are assessed at 0.75 EDUs/acre.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved or when the improvements to be maintained become the responsibility of the City. In Fiscal Year 2024-25 there are 164.18 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $94,835 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $1,015.68/EDU
Fiscal Year 2024-25 Rate: $577.63/EDU

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2024-25 PART D
.
-40-
Assessment District 02-6 (Balfour & John Muir) – CUP00-9 (8550), DR03-01 (8754), MS358-04, DR03-24 and the Fire Station. CUP 02-04 and DR04-21 were annexed in Fiscal Year 2005-06.

Assessment District No. 02-6 is comprised of commercial, vacant commercial, and institutional parcels totaling 76.771 acres. This Assessment District was formed in Fiscal Year 2002-03 and the maximum assessment rate was set with an allowance for a CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year June 30, 2002).

Commercial/institutional parcels are assessed at 3.00 EDUs/acre and vacant commercial parcels are assessed at 0.75 EDUs/acre.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved or when the improvements to be maintained become the responsibility of the City. In Fiscal Year 2024-25 there are 142.55 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $40,782 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $286.10/EDU
Fiscal Year 2024-25 Rate: $286.10/EDU

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2024-25 PART D
.
-41-
Assessment District 02-7 (San Jose and Sand Creek) – DR01-05 (MS357-01), & DR03- 04(MS353-01). DR06-08 was annexed in Fiscal Year 2007-08.

Assessment District No. 02-7 is comprised of commercial, vacant commercial and institutional parcels totaling 77.36 acres. This Assessment District was formed in Fiscal Year 2002-03 and the maximum assessment rate was set with an allowance for a CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year June 30, 2002). Commercial/institutional parcels are assessed at 3.00 EDUs/acre and vacant commercial parcels are assessed at 0.75 EDUs/acre.

The maximum assessment rate includes maintenance of certain areas that are currently proposed to be maintained by the property owners. However, the parcels will be assessed for citywide improvements and the capital replacement costs associated with the public improvements. If the property owners fail to maintain their landscaping improvements to City of Brentwood standards, then the maximum assessment rate has been set high enough for the City to step in and maintain the improvements and assess the property owner for these costs.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved or when the improvements to be maintained become the responsibility of the City. In Fiscal Year 2024-25 there are 221.84 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $98,930 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $1,073.91/EDU
Fiscal Year 2024-25 Rate: $540.63/EDU
Some properties within Assessment District 02-7 are not located within the Grant Street Trail Benefit Boundary and as a result do not benefit from the Grant Street Trail improvements and will be assessed $351.49/EDU.

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2024-25 PART D
.
-42-
Assessment District 02-8 (Lone Tree) – MS 356-04 (Arco). CUP03-04 (Tire Center), MS364-02 (CUP02-18 Family Fitness, DR02-35 Shell, Restaurant) and CUP99-06 (Golden Hills Church) were annexed mid-year Fiscal Year 2003-04. DR05-13 and DR05- 03 were annexed in Fiscal Year 2006-07.

Assessment District No. 02-8 is comprised of commercial and vacant commercial parcels totaling 39.08 acres located at the southeast corner of Lone Tree and Empire Avenue. This Assessment District was formed in Fiscal Year 2002-03 and the maximum assessment rate was decreased in Fiscal Year 2003-04 with an allowance for a CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year June 2003). Commercial parcels are assessed at 3.00 EDUs/acre. Vacant commercial properties are assessed at 0.75 EDUs/acre.

The maximum assessment rate includes maintenance of certain areas that are currently proposed to be maintained by the property owners. However, the parcels will be assessed for citywide improvements and the capital replacement costs associated with the public improvements. If the property owners fail to maintain their landscaping improvements to City of Brentwood standards, then the maximum assessment rate has been set high enough for the City to step in and maintain the improvements and assess the property owner for these costs.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved or when the improvements to be maintained become the responsibility of the City. In Fiscal Year 2024-25 there are 117.24 EDUs that are assessable, however the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $47,043 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $553.86/EDU
Fiscal Year 204-25 Rate: $401.25/EDU

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2024-25 PART D
.
-43-
Assessment District 02-9 (Balfour Plaza) - CUP 01-23 or MS 356-00. DR06-20 was annexed in Fiscal Year 2007-08.

Assessment District No. 02-9 is comprised of commercial and vacant commercial parcels totaling 8.241 acres, located on the southeast corner of Balfour Road and Walnut Boulevard. This Assessment District was formed mid-year Fiscal Year 2002-03 and the maximum assessment rate was set with an allowance for a minimum of a 2% CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year December 2002). Commercial parcels are assessed at 3.00 EDUs/acre and vacant commercial properties are assessed at 0.75 EDUs/acre.

The maximum assessment rate includes maintenance of certain areas that are currently proposed to be maintained by the property owners. However, the parcels will be assessed for citywide improvements and the capital replacement costs associated with the public improvements. If the property owners fail to maintain their landscaping improvements to City of Brentwood standards, then the maximum assessment rate has been set high enough for the City to step in and maintain the improvements and assess the property owner for these costs.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved or when the improvements to be maintained become the responsibility of the City. In Fiscal Year 2024-25 there are 16.60 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $6,913 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $970.53/EDU
Fiscal Year 2024-25 Rate: $416.39/EDU

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2024-25 PART D
.
-44-
Assessment District 02-10 (Lone Tree Center) – Subdivision 8617 or DR 01-32. DR05- 29 was annexed in Fiscal Year 2007-08. The 1.87-acre commercial parcel at the northwest corner of Lone Tree Way and Fairview Avenue and the proposed site of a future McDonald’s was annexed in Fiscal Year 2012-13.

Assessment District No. 02-10 is comprised of commercial and vacant commercial parcels totaling 29.747 acres, located on the north side of Lone Tree Way, west of Empire Avenue. This Assessment District was formed mid-year Fiscal Year 2002-03 and the maximum assessment rate was set with an allowance for a minimum of a 2% CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year December 2002). Commercial parcels are assessed at 3.00 EDUs/acre and vacant commercial properties are assessed at 0.75 EDUs/acre.

The maximum assessment rate includes maintenance of certain areas that are currently proposed to be maintained by the property owners. However, the parcels will be assessed for citywide improvements and the capital replacement costs associated with the public improvements. If the property owners fail to maintain their landscaping improvements to City of Brentwood standards, then the maximum assessment rate has been set high enough for the City to step in and maintain the improvements and assess the property owner for these costs.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved or when the improvements to be maintained become the responsibility of the City. In Fiscal Year 2024-25 there are 72.21 EDUs that are assessable, however the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $18,096 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $250.60/EDU
Fiscal Year 2024-25 Rate: $250.60/EDU

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2024-25 PART D
.
-45-
Assessment District 02-11 (Lone Tree Plaza - Arcadia) - Subdivision 8515 (8768) or DR 01-30. The commercial portion of Subdivision 8506 was annexed Fiscal Year 2008-

09. Assessment District No. 02-11 is comprised of commercial and vacant commercial parcels totaling 82.275 acres, located south of Lone Tree Way and north of Sand Creek Road, between Heidorn Ranch Road and Jeffrey Way. This Assessment District was formed mid-year Fiscal Year 2002-03. The maximum assessment rate was set with an allowance for a minimum of a 2% CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year December 2002. Commercial parcels are assessed at 3.00 EDUs/acre and vacant commercial properties are assessed at 0.75 EDUs/acre.

The maximum assessment rate includes maintenance of certain areas that are currently proposed to be maintained by the property owners. However, the parcels will be assessed for citywide improvements and the capital replacement costs associated with the public improvements. If the property owners fail to maintain their landscaping improvements to City of Brentwood standards, then the maximum assessment rate has been set high enough for the City to step in and maintain the improvements and assess the property owner for these costs.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved or when the improvements to be maintained become the responsibility of the City. In Fiscal Year 2024-25 there are 194.94 EDUs that are assessable, however the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $58,570 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $729.72/EDU
Fiscal Year 2024-25 Rate: $300.45/EDU

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2024-25 PART D
.
-46-
Assessment District 02-12 (Sunset Industrial) - Subdivision 8588 or 8842.

Assessment District No. 02-12 is comprised of 18 industrial, vacant industrial, and institutional parcels totaling 40.25 acres located north of Sunset Road, between Brentwood Boulevard and Sellers Avenue. This Assessment District was formed midyear Fiscal Year 2002-03. Industrial/ institutional parcels are assessed at 3.00 EDUs/acre and vacant industrial parcels are assessed at 0.75 EDU/acre. The maximum assessment rate was set with an allowance for a minimum of a 2% CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year December 2002). This maximum assessment rate includes maintenance of all areas.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved or when the improvements to be maintained become the responsibility of the City. In Fiscal Year 2024-25 there are 112.425 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $70,628 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $953.56/EDU
Fiscal Year 2024-25 Rate: $628.22/EDU
Assessment District 02-13 (Stonehaven) - CUP 01-08 & Subdivision 8661.

Assessment District No. 02-13 is comprised of an 8.738-acre institutional parcel and 45 single-family parcels located at the northeast corner of Fairview and Central. This Assessment District was formed mid-year Fiscal Year 2002-03. Single-family parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel and institutional parcels are assessed at 3.00 EDUs/acre. The maximum assessment rate was set with an allowance for a minimum of a 2% CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year December 2002).

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved or when the improvements to be maintained become the responsibility of the City. In Fiscal Year 2024-25 there are 71.21 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $24,532 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $1,255.30/EDU
Fiscal Year 2024-25 Rate: $344.48/EDU

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2024-25 PART D
.
-47-
Assessment District 03-2 (Meritage Lone Tree) - Subdivision 8546. Subdivisions 8561 & 8675 were annexed Mid-Year Fiscal Year 2003-04. Subdivisions 8724, 8788, 8789, 8832, & 8833 were annexed Fiscal Year 2005-06. Subdivisions 8674, 8875, 8954 and Minor Subdivisions 359-03 & 350-05 were annexed Fiscal Year 2006-07.

Assessment District No. 03-2 is comprised of 1,521 single-family parcels, two vacant single-family parcels and one 7.229-acre institutional parcel located at the southwest corner of O’Hara and Lone Tree Road. This Assessment District was formed Fiscal Year 2003-04. The maximum assessment rate was set with an allowance for a minimum of a 2% CPI increase each fiscal year which was based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year June 2003).

Single-family parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel, vacant single-family parcels are assessed at 0.25 EDUs/parcel, and institutional parcels are assessed at 3.00 EDUs/acre.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved or when the improvements to be maintained become the responsibility of the City. In Fiscal Year 2024-25 there are 1,543.19 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $1,439,311 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $2,582.41/EDU
Fiscal Year 2024-25 Rate: $1,028.66/EDU
Some properties within Assessment District 03-2 are not located within the Grant Street Trail Benefit Boundary and as a result do not benefit from the Grant Street Trail improvements and will be assessed $839.52/EDU.

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2024-25 PART D
.
-48-
Assessment District 03-3 (Brookdale Court) - Subdivision 8722. Subdivision 8854 and minor subdivision 351-00 were annexed Fiscal Year 2006-07.

Assessment District No. 03-3 is comprised of 125 single-family parcels, three vacant single-family parcels and one parcel with 4 condominium units located at the eastern corner of Balfour and Fairview. This Assessment District was formed in Fiscal Year 2003-04 and the maximum assessment rate was set with an allowance for a minimum of a 2% CPI increase each fiscal year based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year June 2003). Single-family parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel and vacant single-family properties are assessed at

0.25 EDUs/parcel. Condominiums are assessed 0.75 EDUs/unit.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved or when the improvements to be maintained become the responsibility of the City. In Fiscal Year 2024-25 there are 128.75 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $81,167 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $2,518.74/EDU
Fiscal Year 2024-25 Rate: $630.42/EDU

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2024-25 PART D
.
-49-
Assessment District 03-4 (Tri City Plaza) – CUP 01-24 and DR00-14 were annexed mid-year Fiscal Year 2003-04.

Assessment District No. 03-4 is comprised of 6 commercial, vacant commercial, and industrial parcels totaling 12.542 acres located on the north & south sides of Lone Tree Road, east of Fairview Avenue. This Assessment District was formed in Fiscal Year 2003-04 and the maximum assessment rate was decreased midyear Fiscal Year 2003- 04 with an allowance for a minimum of a 2% CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year June 2003). Commercial/industrial parcels are at assessed 3.00 EDUs/acre and vacant commercial parcels are assessed at 0.75 EDUs/acre.

The maximum assessment rate includes maintenance of certain areas that are currently proposed to be maintained by the property owners. However, the parcels will be assessed for citywide improvements and the capital replacement costs associated with the public improvements. If the property owners fail to maintain their landscaping improvements to City of Brentwood standards, then the maximum assessment rate has been set high enough for the City to step in and maintain the improvements and assess the property owner for these costs.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved or when the improvements to be maintained become the responsibility of the City. In Fiscal Year 2024-25 there are 33.02 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $11,951 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $363.05/EDU
Fiscal Year 2024-25 Rate: $361.98/EDU

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2024-25 PART D
.
-50-
Assessment District 03-5 (West Summerset) – Subdivision 8953 and DR03-26.

Assessment District No. 03-5 is comprised of 90 single-family residential parcels and a 120-unit assisted living parcel that is 4.72 acres. It is located at the northwest corner of the Highway 4 Bypass and Cortona Way. This Assessment District was formed Fiscal Year 2003-04 and was reorganized in Fiscal Year 2005-06 (the maximum assessment rate was lowered). The maximum assessment rate was set with an allowance for a minimum of a 2% CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year June 2005). Single-family parcels are assessed 1.00 EDU/unit and the 120-senior assisted living institutional property is assessed at 3.00 EDUs/acre.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved or when the improvements to be maintained become the responsibility of the City. In Fiscal Year 2024-25 there are 104.16 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $65,096 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $1,221.48/EDU
Fiscal Year 2024-25 Rate: $624.96/EDU
Assessment District 03-6 (Arbor Village) – Subdivision 8735.

Assessment District No. 03-6 is comprised of 66 single-family parcels located at the southeast corner of Brentwood Boulevard and Sycamore Avenue. This Assessment District was formed mid-year Fiscal Year 2003-04 and the maximum assessment was set with an allowance for a minimum of a 2% CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year June 2003). Single-family parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved or when the improvements to be maintained become the responsibility of the City. In Fiscal Year 2024-25 it is anticipated all local improvements will be maintained through a Homeowners Association. However, the single-family parcels will be assessed for citywide improvements and the capital replacement costs associated with the public improvements. In Fiscal Year 2024-25 there are 66.00 EDUs assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed within the Assessment District is $14,286 (as shown in Appendix A). In addition, if the Homeowners Association fails to properly operate and maintain the improvements within Assessment District No. 03-6 the City Council has the discretion to levy assessments up to the authorized maximum assessment rate.

This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $404.37/EDU
Fiscal Year 2024-25 Rate: $216.46/EDU

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2024-25 PART D
.
-51-
Assessment District 03-7 (Garin Ranch Commercial) – DR02-06 or 8633.

Assessment District No. 03-7 is comprised of 8 commercial/vacant commercial parcels totaling 8.525 acres, located on the northeast corner of Brentwood Boulevard and Balfour Road. This Assessment District was formed mid-year Fiscal Year 2003-04 and the maximum assessment rate was set with an allowance for a minimum of a 2% CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year June 2003). Commercial parcels are assessed at 3.00 EDUs/acre and vacant commercial properties are assessed at 0.75 EDUs/acre.

The maximum assessment rate includes maintenance of certain areas that are currently proposed to be maintained by the property owners. However, the parcels will be assessed for citywide improvements and the capital replacement costs associated with the public improvements. If the property owners fail to maintain their landscaping improvements to City of Brentwood standards, then the maximum assessment rate has been set high enough for the City to step in and maintain the improvements and assess the property owner for these costs.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved or when the improvements to be maintained become the responsibility of the City. In Fiscal Year 2024-25 it is anticipated that parcels within LLAD 03-7 will be assessed for citywide landscape improvements and the capital replacement costs associated with the public improvements. In Fiscal Year 2024-25 there are 21.32 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed within the Assessment District is $6,073 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $425.94/EDU
Fiscal Year 2024-25 Rate: $284.90/EDU

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2024-25 PART D
.
-52-
Assessment District 03-8 (Blackhawk Commercial) – Blackhawk Commercial Assessment District No. 03-8 will eventually be comprised of 86 developed and vacant single-family parcel and one institutional parcel totaling 6.690 acres, located on the southeast corner of Highway 4 Bypass and Balfour Road. This Assessment District was formed mid-year Fiscal Year 2003-04 and the maximum assessment rate was set with an allowance for a minimum of a 2% CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year June 2003). Vacant commercial parcels are assessed at 0.75 EDUs/acre and vacant single-family properties are assessed at 0.25 EDUs/parcel.

The maximum assessment rate includes maintenance of certain areas that are currently proposed to be maintained by the property owners. However, the parcels will be assessed for citywide improvements and the capital replacement costs associated with the public improvements. If the property owners fail to maintain their landscaping improvements to City of Brentwood standards, then the maximum assessment rate has been set high enough for the City to step in and maintain the improvements and assess the property owner for these costs.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved or when the improvements to be maintained become the responsibility of the City. In Fiscal Year 2024-25 there are 88.82 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $31,130 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $1,009.77/EDU
Fiscal Year 2024-25 Rate: $350.48/EDU

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2024-25 PART D
.
-53-
Assessment District 04-2 (Balfour-Griffith Commercial) – CUP03-02 (In Shape City).

DR05-27 was annexed Mid-Year of Fiscal Year 2006-07.

Assessment District No. 04-2 is comprised of 5 commercial and vacant commercial parcels totaling 6.914 acres, located on the southwest corner of Balfour Road and Griffith Lane. This Assessment District was formed in Fiscal Year 2004-05 and the maximum assessment rate was set with an allowance for a minimum of a 2% CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year June 2004). Commercial parcels are assessed at 3.00 EDUs/acre and vacant commercial parcels are assessed at 0.75 EDUs/acre.

The maximum assessment rate includes maintenance of certain areas that are currently proposed to be maintained by the property owners. However, the parcels will be assessed for citywide improvements and the capital replacement costs associated with the public improvements. If the property owners fail to maintain their landscaping improvements to City of Brentwood standards, then the maximum assessment rate has been set high enough for the City to step in and maintain the improvements and assess the property owner for these costs.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved or when the improvements to be maintained become the responsibility of the City. In Fiscal Year 2024-25 there are 19.18 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $6,692 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $348.90/EDU
Fiscal Year 2024-25 Rate: $348.90/EDU

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2024-25 PART D
.
-54-
Assessment District 05-2 (South Brentwood Boulevard Commercial) – DR03-09 (Best Western). DR04-07 (Harvest Commerce) was annexed Fiscal Year 2006-07. Minor Subdivision 353-05 (Valdry Ct. Business Park) was annexed in Fiscal Year 2009-10.

DR15-016 (Elite Storage) and DR16-001 (Tractor Supply) were annexed in Fiscal Year 2016-17.

Assessment District No. 05-2 is comprised of commercial and industrial parcels totaling

16.553 acres, located on Valdry Court. This Assessment District was formed Fiscal Year 2005-06 and the maximum assessment rate was set with an allowance for a minimum of a 2% CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year June 2005).

Commercial/industrial parcels are assessed at 3.00 EDUs/acre.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved or when the improvements to be maintained become the responsibility of the City. In Fiscal Year 2024-25 there are 49.66 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $7,756 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $156.20/EDU
Fiscal Year 2024-25 Rate: $156.20/EDU
Assessment District 06-2 (Palmilla) – Subdivision 8729. Subdivision 8311 was annexed in Fiscal Year 2007-08. Subdivision 8446 was annexed Mid-Year Fiscal Year 2009-10.

Subdivision 9332 was re-subdivided in December 2013.

Assessment District No. 06-2 is comprised of 514 single-family parcels located at Walnut and Central and 8 vacant single-family parcels on St. James Court. This Assessment District was formed in Fiscal Year 2006-07 and the maximum assessment rate was set with an allowance for a minimum of a 2% CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year June 2006). Single-family units are assessed 1.00 EDU/unit.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved or when the improvements to be maintained become the responsibility of the City. In Fiscal Year 2024-25 there are 516.00 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $417,426 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $2,041.49 /EDU
Fiscal Year 2024-25 Rate: $808.97/EDU

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2024-25 PART D
.
-55-
Assessment District 06-3 (Vineyards) – Subdivisions 8796, 8906 through 8910, 9186 and 9451.

Assessment District No. 06-3 is comprised of 1,266 single-family parcels, 3 vacant single-family parcels and 32.072 acres of commercial, vacant commercial, and vacant institutional parcels located in the south portion of Fairview Avenue and the City at State Highway 4 Bypass. This Assessment District was formed mid-year of Fiscal Year 2006-07 and the maximum assessment rate was set with an allowance for a minimum of a 2% CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year June 2006). Single-family parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel. Non-Residential parcels are assessed at

3.00 EDUs/acre. Vacant non-residential parcels are assessed at 0.75 EDUs/acre.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved or when the improvements to be maintained become the responsibility of the City. In Fiscal Year 2024-25 there are 1,327.93 EDUs that are assessable, and the total revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $586,532 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $3,031.79 /EDU
Fiscal Year 2024-25 Rate: $441.69/EDU

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2024-25 PART D
.
-56-
Assessment District 06-4 (Villa Amador) – Design Review 01-43 (Villa Amador Apartments).

Assessment District No. 06-4 is comprised of 96 multi-family units located at the northeast corner of Sand Creek Road and Shady Willow. This Assessment District was formed mid-year of Fiscal Year 2006-07 and the maximum assessment rate was set with an allowance for a minimum of a 2% CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year June 2006). Multi-family parcels are assessed at 0.50 EDU/unit.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved or when the improvements to be maintained become the responsibility of the City. In Fiscal Year 2024-25 there are 48.00 EDUs that are assessable, and the total revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $32,430 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $1,714.97/EDU
Fiscal Year 2024-25 Rate: $675.61/EDU
Assessment District 06-5 (Barrington) – Subdivision 8548.

Assessment District No. 06-5 is comprised of 494 single-family parcels, and 6.26 acres of institutional and vacant institutional parcels located in the east portion of the City at Garin Parkway and Sand Creek Road. This Assessment District was formed mid-year of Fiscal Year 2006-07 and the maximum rate was set with an allowance for a minimum of a 2% CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year June 2006). Single-family parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel. Institutional parcels are assessed at 3.00 EDUs/acre and vacant institutional parcels are assessed at 0.75 EDUs/acre.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved or when the improvements to be maintained become the responsibility of the City. In Fiscal Year 2024-25 there are 509.95 EDUs that are assessable, and the total revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $545,142 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $2,560.81/EDU
Fiscal Year 2024-25 Rate: $1,069.02/EDU

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2024-25 PART D
.
-57-
Assessment District 11-1 (North Brentwood Boulevard) – Subdivision 9155. Design Review 10-003 (The Grove at Sunset Court) was annexed in Fiscal Year 2012-13.

Assessment District No. 11-1 is comprised of 33 single-family parcels, 10 duet units, and a 54-unit apartment complex located on the west side of Brentwood Boulevard just south of Marsh Creek. This Assessment District was formed mid-year of Fiscal Year 2011-12 and the maximum rate was set with an allowance for a minimum of a 2% CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year June 2011). Single-family parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel, duets at 0.75EDU/parcel, and multi-family parcels are assessed at 0.50 EDUs/unit.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved or when the improvements to be maintained become the responsibility of the City. In Fiscal Year 2024-25 there are 57.50 EDUs that are assessable, and the total revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $27,718 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $1,061.95/EDU
Fiscal Year 2024-25 Rate: $482.05/EDU
Assessment District 14-1 (Mission Grove) – Subdivision 9154 and 9371.

Assessment District No. 14-1 is comprised of 129 single-family parcels located on the west side of Armstrong Road. This Assessment District was formed in Fiscal Year 2013-14 and the maximum rate was set with an allowance for a minimum of a 2% CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year June 2013). Single-family parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved or when the improvements to be maintained become the responsibility of the City. In Fiscal Year 2024-25 there are 129.00 EDUs that are assessable, and the total revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements that benefit the Assessment District is $75,677 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $933.36/EDU
Fiscal Year 2024-25 Rate: $586.64/EDU

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2024-25 PART D
.
-58-
Assessment District 14-2 (Ferro-Ronconi) – Subdivision 9173.

Assessment District No. 14-2 is comprised of 160 single-family and two vacant singlefamily parcels located on the west side of Griffith Lane just north of Balfour Road. This Assessment District was formed in Fiscal Year 2013-14 and the maximum rate was set with an allowance for a minimum of a 2% CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year June 2013). Single-family parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel and vacant single-family parcels are assessed at 0.25 EDU/parcel.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved or when the improvements to be maintained become the responsibility of the City. In Fiscal Year 2024-25 there are 160.00 EDUs that are assessable, and the total revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements that benefit the Assessment District is $143,966 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $1,386.72/EDU
Fiscal Year 2024-25 Rate: $899.79/EDU
Assessment District 15-1 (Bella Fiore) – Subdivision 9378.

Assessment District No. 15-1 is comprised of 98 single-family parcels located between Shady Willow Lane and Empire Avenue just north of Amber Lane. This Assessment District was formed mid-year of Fiscal Year 2014-15 and the maximum rate was set with an allowance for a minimum of a 2% CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year June 2015). Single-family parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved or when the improvements to be maintained become the responsibility of the City. In Fiscal Year 2024-25 there are 98.00 EDUs that are assessable, and the total revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements that benefit the Assessment District is $78,809 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $901.86/EDU
Fiscal Year 2024-25 Rate: $804.17/EDU

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2024-25 PART D
.
-59-
Assessment District 15-2 (Renaissance Estates) – Subdivision 9372.

Assessment District No. 15-2 is comprised of 9 single-family parcels located south of Amber Lane just off Windy Springs Lane. This Assessment District was formed midyear of Fiscal Year 2014-15 and the maximum rate was set with an allowance for a minimum of a 2% CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year June 2015). Singlefamily parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved or when the improvements to be maintained become the responsibility of the City. In Fiscal Year 2024-25 there are 9.00 EDUs that are assessable, and the total revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements that benefit the Assessment District is $14,744 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $1,664.54/EDU
Fiscal Year 2024-25 Rate: $1,638.22/EDU
Assessment District 16-1 (Bond Lane) – Subdivisions 9386 and 9387.

Assessment District No. 16-1 is comprised of 63 single-family parcels located between O’Hara Lane and Adams Lane north of Grant Street. This Assessment District was formed in Fiscal Year 2016-17 and the maximum rate was set with an allowance for a minimum of a 2% CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year June 2015). Singlefamily parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved or when the improvements to be maintained become the responsibility of the City. In Fiscal Year 2024-25 there are 63.00 EDUs that are assessable, and the total revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements that benefit the Assessment District is $91,416 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $2,129.48/EDU
Fiscal Year 2024-25 Rate: $1,451.04/EDU

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2024-25 PART D
.
-60-
Assessment District 16-2 (Sellers) – Subdivisions 9411 and 9421.

Assessment District No. 16-2 is comprised of 180 single-family parcels located west of Sellers Avenue and south of Balfour Road. This Assessment District was formed midyear of Fiscal Year 2016-17 and the maximum rate was set with an allowance for a minimum of a 2% CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year June 2016). Singlefamily parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel and vacant single-family parcels are assessed at 0.25 EDUs/parcel.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved or when the improvements to be maintained become the responsibility of the City. In Fiscal Year 2024-25 there are 180.00 EDUs that are assessable, and the total revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements that benefit the Assessment District is $109,172 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $606.51/EDU
Fiscal Year 2024-25 Rate: $606.51/EDU
Assessment District 17-1 (Sparrow) – Subdivision 9393.

Assessment District No. 17-1 is comprised of 50 single-family parcels located west of Brentwood Boulevard and north of Sand Creek Road. This Assessment District was formed mid-year of Fiscal Year 2016-17 and the maximum rate was set with an allowance for a minimum of a 2% CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year June 2016). Single-family parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved or when the improvements to be maintained become the responsibility of the City. In Fiscal Year 2024-25 there are 50.00 EDUs that are assessable, and the total revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements that benefit the Assessment District is $34,084 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $946.50/EDU
Fiscal Year 2024-25 Rate: $681.67/EDU

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2024-25 PART D
.
-61-
Assessment District 17-2 (Catching’s Ranch) – Subdivision 9424.

Assessment District No. 17-2 is comprised of 24 single-family parcels located west of Minnesota Road and north of Balfour Road. This Assessment District was formed midyear of Fiscal Year 2016-17 and the maximum rate was set with an allowance for a minimum of a 2% CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year June 2016). Singlefamily parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel and vacant single-family parcels are assessed at 0.25 EDU/parcel.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved or when the improvements to be maintained become the responsibility of the City. In Fiscal Year 2024-25 there are 24.00 EDUs that are assessable, and the total revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements that benefit the Assessment District is $26,299 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $1,384.77/EDU
Fiscal Year 2024-25 Rate: $1,095.79/EDU
Assessment District 17-3 (Cornerstone Fellowship) – DR15-004.

Assessment District No. 17-3 is comprised of one 5.312-acre institutional parcel located south of Lone Tree Way and west of Windy Springs Lane. This Assessment District was formed mid-year Fiscal Year 2017-18 and the maximum rate was set with an allowance for a minimum of a 2% CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year June 2017). Institutional parcels are assessed at 3.00 EDUs/acre.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved or when the improvements to be maintained become the responsibility of the City. In Fiscal Year 2024-25 there are 15.94 EDUs that are assessable, and the total revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements that benefit the Assessment District is $6,811 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $519.24/EDU
Fiscal Year 2024-25 Rate: $427.37/EDU

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2024-25 PART D
.
-62-
Assessment District 19-1 (Terrene) – Subdivisions 9471 and 9496.

Assessment District No. 19-1 is comprised of 326 single-family parcels located east of Brentwood Boulevard and north and south of Sand Creek Road. This Assessment District was formed mid-year Fiscal Year 2018-19 and the maximum rate was set with an allowance for a minimum of a 2% CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year June 2018). Single-family parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel and vacant singlefamily parcels are assessed at 0.25 EDUs/parcel.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved or when the improvements to be maintained become the responsibility of the City. In Fiscal Year 2024-25 there are 326.00 EDUs that are assessable, and the total revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements that benefit the Assessment District is $198,745 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $1,029.27/EDU
Fiscal Year 2024-25 Rate: $668.24/EDU
Some properties within Assessment District 19-1 are not located within the Grant Street Trail Benefit Boundary and as a result do not benefit from the Grant Street Trail improvements and will be assessed $479.10/EDU.

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2024-25 PART D
.
-63-
Assessment District 19-2 (Alvernaz) – Subdivision 9424. Subdivision 9496 was annexed in Fiscal Year 2019-20.

Assessment District No. 19-2 is comprised of 208 single family parcels located east of Empire Avenue and north of Lone Tree Way. This Assessment District was formed mid-year Fiscal Year 2018-19 and the maximum rate was set with an allowance for a minimum of a 2% CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year June 2018). Singlefamily parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved or when the improvements to be maintained become the responsibility of the City. In Fiscal Year 2024-25 there are 208.00 EDUs that are assessable, and the total revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements that benefit the Assessment District is $122,198 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $698.82/EDU
Fiscal Year 2024-25 Rate: $587.49/EDU

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2024-25 PART D
.
-64-
Assessment District 21-2 (Orchard Trails) – Subdivision 9523.

Assessment District No. 21-2 is anticipated to be comprised of 77 single-family and 2 attached single-family parcels located south of Continente Avenue and west of Walnut Boulevard. This Assessment District was formed the beginning of Fiscal Year 2021-22 and the maximum rate was set with an allowance for a minimum of a 2% CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year of 2020). Single-family parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel and attached single-family parcels are assessed at 0.75 EDUs/parcel.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved or when the improvements to be maintained become the responsibility of the City. In Fiscal Year 2024-25 there are 78.50 EDUs that are assessable, and the total revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements that benefit the Assessment District is $94,699 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $1,206.38/EDU
Fiscal Year 2024-25 Rate: $1,206.36/EDU
Assessment District 21-3 (Bennett Estates) – Subdivision 9519.

Assessment District No. 21-3 is anticipated to be comprised of 14 single family parcels located west of O’Hara Avenue and north of Grant Street Trail. This Assessment District was formed the beginning of Fiscal Year 2021-22 and the maximum rate was set with an allowance for a minimum of a 2% CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year of 2020). Single-family parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved or when the improvements to be maintained become the responsibility of the City. In Fiscal Year 2024-25 there are 14.00 EDUs that are assessable, and the total revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements that benefit the Assessment District is $18,412 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $1,315.17/EDU
Fiscal Year 2024-25 Rate: $1,315.14/EDU

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2024-25 PART D
.
-65-
Assessment District 23-1 (Orchard Grove) – Subdivision 9535.

Assessment District No. 23-1 is anticipated to be comprised of 45 single family parcels and 6 duet parcels located east of Adams Lane and north of Gracie Lane. This Assessment District was formed the beginning of Fiscal Year 2023-24, and the maximum rate was set with an allowance for a minimum of a 2% CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year of 2022). Single-family parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel and duets are assessed at 0.75 EDU/parcel.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved or when the improvements to be maintained become the responsibility of the City. In Fiscal Year 2024-25 there are 12.38 EDUs that are assessable, and the total revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements that benefit the Assessment District is $8,003 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $1,664.07/EDU
Fiscal Year 2024-25 Rate: $646.71/EDU

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2024-25 PART E
.
-66-
PART E

PROPERTY OWNER LIST & ASSESSMENT ROLL
A list of names and addresses of the owners of all parcels, and the description of each lot or parcel within each of the City of Brentwood’s Landscape & Lighting Districts is shown on the last equalized Property Tax Roll of the Contra Costa County Assessor, which by reference is hereby made a part of this Report.

This list is keyed to the Assessor's Parcel Numbers as shown on the Assessment Roll, which includes the proposed amount of assessments apportioned to each lot or parcel.

The Assessment Roll is on file in the Office of the City Clerk of the City of Brentwood and is shown in this Report as Appendix “B”.

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2024-25 APPENDIX A

APPENDIX A

DETAILED PROJECT COST BREAKDOWN

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2024-25 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2024-25 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 94-1
Brentwood Country Club
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2024 $42,759 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) ($5,377)
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) ($23,697)
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) ($258)
Landscaping ($40,848)
($70,180)
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($1,781)
Administration ($11,290)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($2,267)
($15,338)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail $0
Arterial Landscaping ($503,786)
Arterial Lighting ($48,898)
Parks ($432,588)
($985,272)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($42,759)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) ($4,135) ($46,894)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $1,793
Fund Balance Credit $436,886
Additional City Contribution $0
$436,886
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $636,246
Proposed Fiscal Year 2024-25
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source.

The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source.
3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 1

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2024-25 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2024-25 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 95-2
Hawthorne Landing
Proposed Fiscal Year 2024-25
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2024 $55,407 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) ($5,708)
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) ($63,411)
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) ($200)
Landscaping ($24,267)
($93,586)
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($2,307)
Administration ($14,629)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($291)
($17,227)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail $0
Arterial Landscaping ($62,694)
Arterial Lighting ($6,085)
Parks ($55,210)
($123,989)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($55,407)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) ($4,135) ($59,542)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $2,299
Fund Balance Credit $1,842
Additional City Contribution $114,802
$116,644
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $119,995
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source.

The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source.
3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 2

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2024-25 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2024-25 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 95-3
Pheasant Run
Proposed Fiscal Year 2024-25
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2024 $289 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) $0
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) ($466)
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) $0
Landscaping $0
($466)
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($12)
Administration ($76)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($23)
($111)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail $0
Arterial Landscaping ($5,047)
Arterial Lighting ($490)
Parks ($4,444)
($9,981)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($289)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) $0
($289)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $12
Fund Balance Credit $1,022
Additional City Contribution $2,790
$3,812
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $6,735
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source.

The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source.
3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 3

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2024-25 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2024-25 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 95-4
Diablo Estates
Proposed Fiscal Year 2024-25
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2024 $14 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) $0
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) $0
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) $0
Landscaping $0
$0
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($1)
Administration ($4)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($23)
($28)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail $0
Arterial Landscaping ($5,047)
Arterial Lighting ($490)
Parks ($4,444)
($9,981)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($14)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) $0
($14)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $1
Fund Balance Credit $1,110
Additional City Contribution $2,600
$3,710
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $6,298
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source.

The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source.
3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 4

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2024-25 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2024-25 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 95-5
California Spirit & Glory
Proposed Fiscal Year 2024-25
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2024 $56,678 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) ($8,273)
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) ($52,337)
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) ($180)
Landscaping ($34,804)
($95,594)
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($2,360)
Administration ($14,965)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($437)
($17,762)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail $0
Arterial Landscaping ($94,333)
Arterial Lighting ($9,156)
Parks ($83,072)
($186,561)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($56,678)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) ($3,422) ($60,100)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $2,336
Fund Balance Credit $22,565
Additional City Contribution $113,342
$135,907
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $165,096
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source.

The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source.
3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 5

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2024-25 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2024-25 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 95-6
Gerry Ranch
Proposed Fiscal Year 2024-25
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2024 $11,701 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) ($2,288)
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) ($8,776)
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) ($46)
Landscaping ($8,636)
($19,746)
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($487)
Administration ($3,089)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($79)
($3,655)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail $0
Arterial Landscaping ($17,081)
Arterial Lighting ($1,658)
Parks ($15,042)
($33,781)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($11,701)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) ($341)
($12,042)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $475
Fund Balance Credit $10,567
Additional City Contribution $6,279
$16,846
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $40,203
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source.

The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source.
3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 6

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2024-25 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2024-25 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 95-7
Greystone
Proposed Fiscal Year 2024-25
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2024 $18,120 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) ($2,132)
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) ($30,504)
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) ($130)
Landscaping ($13,129)
($45,895)
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($1,136)
Administration ($7,205)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($337)
($8,678)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail $0
Arterial Landscaping ($74,255)
Arterial Lighting ($7,207)
Parks ($64,051)
($145,513)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($27,287)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) ($2,741) ($30,028)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $1,146
Fund Balance Credit $0
Additional City Contribution $94,975
$94,975
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $115,873
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source.

The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source.
3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 7

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2024-25 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2024-25 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 95-8
Garin Ranch
Proposed Fiscal Year 2024-25
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2024 $43,824 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) ($14,322)
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) ($79,804)
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) ($1,260)
Landscaping ($33,265)
($128,651)
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($3,181)
Administration ($20,168)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($769)
($24,118)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail $0
Arterial Landscaping ($165,761)
Arterial Lighting ($16,089)
Parks ($145,974)
($327,824)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($76,385)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) ($35,239) ($111,624)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $3,760
Fund Balance Credit $0
Additional City Contribution $253,097
$253,097
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $291,536
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source.

The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source.
3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 8

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2024-25 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2024-25 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 97-1
Brentwood Lakes
Proposed Fiscal Year 2024-25
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2024 $50,868 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) ($7,628)
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) ($33,972)
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) ($128)
Landscaping ($43,625)
($85,353)
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($2,118)
Administration ($13,431)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($833)
($16,382)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail $0
Arterial Landscaping ($182,754)
Arterial Lighting ($17,739)
Parks ($158,374)
($358,867)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($50,868)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) ($5,303) ($56,171)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $2,141
Fund Balance Credit $0
Additional City Contribution $0
$0
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $463,765
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source.

The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source.
3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 9

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2024-25 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2024-25 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 97-2
Marsh Creek Apartments
Proposed Fiscal Year 2024-25
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2024 $1 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) $0
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) $0
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) $0
Landscaping $0
$0
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees $0
Administration $0
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($1)
($1)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail ($11,916)
Arterial Landscaping ($12,228)
Arterial Lighting ($1,187)
Parks ($17,230)
($42,561)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($1)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) $0
($1)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $0
Fund Balance Credit $260
Additional City Contribution $21,673
$21,933
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $20,630
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source.

The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source.
3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 10

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2024-25 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2024-25 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 97-3
Brentwood Park Apartments
Proposed Fiscal Year 2024-25
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2024 $167 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) $0
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) ($280)
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) $0
Landscaping $0
($280)
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($7)
Administration ($44)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($2)
($53)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail $0
Arterial Landscaping ($15,528)
Arterial Lighting ($1,507)
Parks ($21,879)
($38,914)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($167)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) $0
($167)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $7
Fund Balance Credit $1,085
Additional City Contribution $34,285
$35,370
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $3,871
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source.

The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source.
3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 11

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2024-25 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2024-25 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 98-3
Solana
Proposed Fiscal Year 2024-25
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2024 $5,238 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) ($313)
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) ($5,378)
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) ($15)
Landscaping ($3,095)
($8,801)
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($218)
Administration ($1,383)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($74)
($1,675)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail $0
Arterial Landscaping ($15,916)
Arterial Lighting ($1,545)
Parks ($14,016)
($31,477)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($5,238)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) ($227)
($5,465)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $214
Fund Balance Credit $6,442
Additional City Contribution $0
$6,442
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $35,524
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source.

The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source.
3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 12

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2024-25 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2024-25 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 98-4
Birchwood Estates
Proposed Fiscal Year 2024-25
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2024 $9,805 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) ($689)
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) ($15,686)
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) ($70)
Landscaping ($6,422)
($22,867)
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($563)
Administration ($3,571)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($46)
($4,180)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail $0
Arterial Landscaping ($9,899)
Arterial Lighting ($961)
Parks ($8,717)
($19,577)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($13,524)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) ($1,135) ($14,659)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $564
Fund Balance Credit $5,767
Additional City Contribution $14,308
$20,075
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $30,839
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source.

The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source.
3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 13

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2024-25 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2024-25 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 98-5
Arroya Seco
Proposed Fiscal Year 2024-25
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2024 $750 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) $0
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) ($1,211)
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) $0
Landscaping $0
($1,211)
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($31)
Administration ($198)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($59)
($288)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail ($12,294)
Arterial Landscaping ($12,617)
Arterial Lighting ($1,225)
Parks ($11,110)
($37,246)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($750)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) $0
($750)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $30
Fund Balance Credit $1,847
Additional City Contribution $6,915
$8,762
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $29,954
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source.

The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source.
3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 14

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2024-25 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2024-25 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 99-3
SPA "L"
Proposed Fiscal Year 2024-25
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2024 $141,564 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) ($14,573)
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) ($81,350)
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) ($669)
Landscaping ($142,375)
($238,967)
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($5,896)
Administration ($37,377)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($888)
($44,161)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail ($149,846)
Arterial Landscaping ($191,431)
Arterial Lighting ($18,581)
Parks ($168,563)
($528,421)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($141,564)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) ($16,249) ($157,813)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $5,988
Fund Balance Credit $97,419
Additional City Contribution $136,673
$234,092
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $587,718
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source.

The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source.
3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 15

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2024-25 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2024-25 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 99-4
California Grove
Proposed Fiscal Year 2024-25
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2024 $8,732 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) ($2,261)
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) ($11,711)
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) ($26)
Landscaping ($5,397)
($19,395)
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($478)
Administration ($3,033)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($65)
($3,576)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail ($13,618)
Arterial Landscaping ($13,975)
Arterial Lighting ($1,356)
Parks ($12,307)
($41,256)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($11,486)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) ($632)
($12,118)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $472
Fund Balance Credit $0
Additional City Contribution $25,207
$25,207
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $41,934
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source.

The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source.
3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 16

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2024-25 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2024-25 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 99-5
Deer Ridge Country Club
Proposed Fiscal Year 2024-25
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2024 $175,178 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) ($28,809)
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) ($102,859)
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) ($498)
Landscaping ($163,690)
($295,856)
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($7,295)
Administration ($46,253)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($952)
($54,500)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail $0
Arterial Landscaping ($210,024)
Arterial Lighting ($20,386)
Parks ($181,555)
($411,965)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($175,178)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) ($17,563) ($192,741)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $7,358
Fund Balance Credit $0
Additional City Contribution $0
$0
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $772,526
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source.

The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source.
3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 17

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2024-25 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2024-25 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 99-6
Trailside
Proposed Fiscal Year 2024-25
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2024 $7,571 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) ($763)
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) ($8,045)
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) ($21)
Landscaping ($3,937)
($12,766)
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($315)
Administration ($1,999)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($61)
($2,375)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail ($12,862)
Arterial Landscaping ($13,199)
Arterial Lighting ($1,281)
Parks ($11,623)
($38,965)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($7,571)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) ($1,119) ($8,690)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $325
Fund Balance Credit $2,726
Additional City Contribution $24,882
$27,608
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $27,293
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source.

The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source.
3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 18

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2024-25 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2024-25 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 99-7
Termo
Proposed Fiscal Year 2024-25
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2024 $58,631 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) ($6,783)
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) ($49,400)
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) ($143)
Landscaping ($42,764)
($99,090)
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($2,442)
Administration ($15,480)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($249)
($18,171)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail $0
Arterial Landscaping ($53,766)
Arterial Lighting ($5,219)
Parks ($47,348)
($106,333)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($58,631)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) ($2,660) ($61,291)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $2,398
Fund Balance Credit $57,810
Additional City Contribution $17,687
$75,497
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $148,360
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source.

The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source.
3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 19

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2024-25 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2024-25 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 99-8
Gerry Property
Proposed Fiscal Year 2024-25
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2024 $4,437 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) ($786)
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) ($4,738)
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) ($8)
Landscaping ($1,862)
($7,394)
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($185)
Administration ($1,171)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($123)
($1,479)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail $0
Arterial Landscaping ($26,592)
Arterial Lighting ($2,581)
Parks ($23,417)
($52,590)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($4,437)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) ($324)
($4,761)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $184
Fund Balance Credit $0
Additional City Contribution $0
$0
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $61,604
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source.

The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source.
3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 20

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2024-25 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2024-25 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 99-9
Richmond American
Proposed Fiscal Year 2024-25
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2024 $49,955 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) ($3,968)
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) ($60,984)
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) ($126)
Landscaping ($19,340)
($84,418)
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($2,080)
Administration ($13,190)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($221)
($15,491)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail $0
Arterial Landscaping ($47,555)
Arterial Lighting ($4,616)
Parks ($41,878)
($94,049)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($49,955)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) ($3,551) ($53,506)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $2,069
Fund Balance Credit $32,690
Additional City Contribution $0
$32,690
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $162,751
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source.

The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source.
3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 21

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2024-25 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2024-25 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 00-2
Lyon Woodfield
Proposed Fiscal Year 2024-25
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2024 $2,244 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) ($126)
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) ($3,542)
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) ($11)
Landscaping ($2,017)
($5,696)
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($142)
Administration ($899)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($73)
($1,114)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail ($15,320)
Arterial Landscaping ($15,722)
Arterial Lighting ($1,526)
Parks ($13,845)
($46,413)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($3,405)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) ($486)
($3,891)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $146
Fund Balance Credit $0
Additional City Contribution $11,431
$11,431
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $43,293
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source.

The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source.
3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 22

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2024-25 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2024-25 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 00-3
California Orchard
Proposed Fiscal Year 2024-25
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2024 $12,962 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) ($4,814)
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) ($14,478)
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) ($11)
Landscaping ($2,414)
($21,717)
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($540)
Administration ($3,422)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($245)
($4,207)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail $0
Arterial Landscaping ($54,364)
Arterial Lighting ($5,277)
Parks ($46,785)
($106,426)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($12,962)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) ($7,227) ($20,189)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $663
Fund Balance Credit $0
Additional City Contribution $0
$0
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $138,914
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source.

The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source.
3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 23