Cities Index.
Agenda packet, second session

Brentwood City Council
May 13, 2025

Document
Agenda packet, second session
Meeting
May 13, 2025
Body
Brentwood City Council
Pages
790
Original file
49.8 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on pub-brentwood.escribemeetings.com. That file is the official record.

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION II
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PROPOSITION 218
.
-2-

SECTION II
IMPACTS OF PROPOSITION 218
Fiscal Year 2025-26
On November 5, 1996, California voters approved Proposition 218 entitled "Right to Vote on Taxes Act" which added Articles XIIIC and XIIID to the California Constitution. While its title refers only to taxes, Proposition 218 establishes new procedural requirements for the formation and administration of assessment districts.

These new procedures establish that even if assessments are initially exempt from Proposition 218, future increases in assessments must comply with the provisions of Articles XIIIC and XIIID of the California Constitution. However, if the increase in assessments were anticipated in the assessment formula (e.g., CPI increase or assessment cap) then the assessment would comply with the intent and provisions of Proposition 218.

Page 170 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 ENGINEER'S REPORT
.
-3-

SECTION III

ENGINEER'S REPORT PREPARED PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972
SECTION 22500 THROUGH 22679

OF THE CALIFORNIA STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE
Pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California), and in accordance with the Resolution of Initiation, being Resolution No. 2025-30, which directs the preparation and filing of the Engineer’s Report, adopted by the City Council of the City of Brentwood, on March 25, 2025 and in connection with the proceedings for:

CITY OF BRENTWOOD
CONSOLIDATED REPORT FOR THE CITY’S

LANDSCAPE & LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS
Herein after referred to as the “District", I, Eduardo R. Espinoza, P.E., the duly appointed ENGINEER OF WORK, submit herewith the "Report" consisting of five (5) parts as follows:

PART A: PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
This part describes the improvements in each District. Plans and specifications for the improvements are as set forth on the lists thereof, attached hereto, and are on file in the Office of the Brentwood City Clerk and Engineering Department and are incorporated herein by reference.

PART B: ESTIMATE OF COST
This part contains an estimate of the cost of the proposed improvements, including incidental costs and expenses in connection therewith, is as set forth on the lists thereof, attached hereto, and is on file in the City’s Parks and Recreation Department.

PART C: ASSESSMENT DISTRICT DIAGRAM
This part incorporates by reference a diagram of the Consolidated Assessment Districts showing the exterior boundaries of each District, the boundaries of any zones within each District and the lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel of land within each District. The diagram has been prepared by the Engineer of Work and is on file in the Office of the Brentwood City Clerk and the Parks and Recreation Department. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within each District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the Contra Costa County Assessor for the year when this Report was prepared. The Assessor's maps and records are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Report.

Page 171 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 ENGINEER'S REPORT
.
-4-
PART D: METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF ASSESSMENT
This part contains the method of apportionment of assessments, based upon parcel classification of land within each District, in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received.

PART E: PROPERTY OWNER LIST & ASSESSMENT ROLL
This part contains a list of the Contra Costa County Assessor’s Parcel numbers, and the net amount to be assessed upon the benefited lands within each District. The Assessment Roll is filed in the Office of the Brentwood City Clerk and is incorporated in this Report by reference. The list is keyed to the records of the Contra Costa County Assessor, which are incorporated herein by reference.

Page 172 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART A
.
-5-
PART A

PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS

IMPROVEMENTS AND SERVICES
The improvements and services authorized by the provisions of the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, being Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, commencing with Section 22500 (hereafter referred to as the “1972 Act”), that may be applicable to these Districts and associated assessments may include one or more of the following definitions:
• “Improvement” means one or any combination of the following:
o The installation or planting of landscaping.
o The installation or construction of statuary, fountains, and other ornamental structures and facilities.
o The installation or construction of public lighting facilities, including, but not limited to, traffic signals.
o The installation or construction of any facilities which are appurtenant to any of the forgoing, or which are necessary or convenient for the maintenance or servicing thereof, including, but not limited to, grading, clearing, removal of debris, the installation or construction of curbs, gutters, walls, sidewalks, or paving, or water, irrigation, drainage, or electrical facilities. o The installation of park or recreational improvements, including, but not limited to all the following:
 Land preparation, such as grading, leveling, cutting and filling, sod, landscaping, irrigation systems, sidewalks, and drainage.  Lights, playground equipment, play courts, and public restrooms. o The maintenance or servicing, or both, of any of the forgoing, and of any improvements authorized below.
o The acquisition of land for park, recreational, or open space purposes. o The acquisition of any existing improvement otherwise authorized herein. o The acquisition or construction of any community center, municipal auditorium or hall, or similar public facility for the indoor presentation of performances, shows, stage productions, fairs, conventions, exhibitions, pageants, meetings, parties, or other group events, activities, or functions, whether those events, activities, or functions are public or private. • “Incidental expenses” include all the following:
o The costs of preparation of the report, including plans, specifications, estimates, diagram, and assessment.
o The costs of printing, advertising, and giving of published, posted, and mailed notices.
o Compensation payable to the county for collection of assessments. o Compensation of any engineer or attorney employed to render services in proceedings pursuant to this part.

Page 173 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART A
.
-6-
o Any other expenses incidental to the construction, installation, or maintenance and servicing of improvements.
o Any expenses incidental to the construction, installation, or maintenance and servicing of the improvements.
o Any expenses incidental to the issuance of bonds or notes. o Costs associated with any elections held for the approval of a new or increased assessment.
• “Landscaping” means trees, shrubs, grass, or other ornamental vegetation. • “Maintain” or “maintenance” means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation, and services of any improvement, including:
o Repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement. o Providing for the life, growth, health, and beauty of landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing, or treating for disease or injury.
o The removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris, and other solid waste. o The cleaning, sandblasting, and painting of walls and other improvements to remove or cover graffiti.
• “Public lighting facilities” means all works or improvements used or useful for the lighting of any public places, including ornamental standards, luminaries, poles, supports, tunnels, manholes, vaults, conduits, pipes, wires, conductors, guys, stubs, platforms, braces, transformers, insulators, contacts, switches, capacitors, meters, communication circuits, appliances, attachments, and appurtenances. • “Service” or “servicing” means the furnishing of:
o Electric current or energy, gas, or other illuminating agent for any public lighting facilities or for the lighting or operation of any other improvements. o Water for the irrigation of any landscaping, the operation of any fountains, or the maintenance of any other improvements.

DESCRIPTION OF DISTRICT IMPROVEMENTS
The improvements, which have been constructed within the City of Brentwood, and those which may be subsequently constructed, will be operated, maintained, and serviced are generally described as follows:

The construction, operation, maintenance, servicing, and replacement of landscaping and street lighting located along arterial and local roadways, Grant Street Trail and other trail improvements, parks and recreational improvements, and appurtenant facilities including but not limited to; personnel, electrical energy, utilities such as water, materials, contractual services, and other items necessary for the satisfactory operation of these services and improvements as described below.

Page 174 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART A
.
-7-
Street Lighting Improvements Along Arterial and Major Roadways Median and roadside streetlights located along arterial and major roadways in the City consist of, but are not limited to poles, fixtures, bulbs, conduits, equipment including guys, anchors, posts and pedestals, metering devices, utilities and other appurtenant facilities within the public rights-of-way and easements benefitting parcels within the boundaries of the Districts.

Landscaping Improvements Along Arterial and Major Roadways Median and roadside landscaping improvements located along arterial and major roadways in the City consist of, but are not limited to landscaping, irrigation, planting, shrubbery, ground cover, trees, pathways, hardscapes, walls, fences, utilities, and other appurtenant facilities required to provide landscaping within the public rights-of-way and easements benefitting parcels within the boundaries of the Districts.

Grant Street Trail Improvements
Grant Street Trail improvements consist of, but are not limited to landscaping, irrigation, planting, shrubbery, ground cover, trees, pathways, hardscapes, walls, fences, utilities, and other appurtenant facilities required to provide landscaping within the public rightsof-way and easements benefitting parcels within the boundaries of the Districts.

Park Improvements
Community and neighborhood parks and open space improvements in the City consist of, but are not limited to parks, open space, drainage areas, creeks, ponds, pathway materials, landscaping, trees, shrubbery, sidewalks, tot lots, park equipment, playgrounds, fences, etc. including the removal of trash and debris, and other appurtenant facilities within the public park areas, public rights-of-way, and easements benefitting parcels within the boundaries of the Districts.

In-Tract Street Lighting Improvements
In-tract streetlights located along and adjacent to in-tract roadways of each District consist of, but are not limited to poles, fixtures, bulbs, conduits, equipment including guys, anchors, posts and pedestals, metering devices, utilities and other appurtenant facilities within the public rights-of-way and easements benefitting parcels within the boundaries of the Districts.

In-Tract Landscaping Improvements
In-tract landscaping improvements located within or adjacent to the District consist of, but are not limited to landscaping, irrigation, planting, shrubbery, ground cover, trees, pathways, hardscapes, walls, monuments, fences, utilities, and other appurtenant facilities required to provide landscaping within the public rights-of-way and easements benefitting parcels within the boundaries of the Districts.

Page 175 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART A
.
-8-
Contra Costa Flood Control Landscape Maintenance
Beginning in Fiscal Year 2000-01 and thereafter, certain Districts became responsible for increased landscape maintenance along the Contra Costa County Flood Control rightsof-way. For a more detailed description of the affected areas refer to the agreement between the City of Brentwood and the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District for Creeks, Trails, Landscaping, and Lighting.

Improvement diagrams have been prepared identifying all the improvements and areas that are to be maintained by the Districts. A copy of these diagrams is on file with the City Parks and Recreation Department.

Page 176 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART B
.
-9-
PART B

ESTIMATE OF COST
The 1972 Act requires that a special fund be set up for the collection of revenues and expenditures of each District. The Act provides that the total cost of construction, operation, and maintenance and servicing of the public landscaping, street lighting, parks, trails, and open space improvements, etc. can be recovered by each District. Incidental expenses including administration of the Districts, engineering fees, legal fees and all other costs associated with the construction, operation and maintenance and servicing of the Districts can also be included.

Revenues collected from the assessments shall be used only for the expenditures represented above. A contribution to each District by the City may be made to reduce assessments as the City deems appropriate. Any balance remaining on July 1 at the end of the fiscal year must be carried over to the next fiscal year unless the funds are being accumulated for future capital improvements or operating reserves.

The table on the following page provides a summary of the estimated revenues and cost estimates for Fiscal Year 2025-26.

For a detailed breakdown of the revenues and cost estimates for each District, as well as Grant Street Trail and Street Lighting and Landscaping Improvements along Arterials and Major Roads, please refer to both Appendix "A" in this report, and the City’s budget for Fiscal Year 2025-26.

Page 177 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART B
.
-10-
District District Name
June 30, 2025
Fund Balance
available for
Operating
Reserves
Fiscal Year
2025-26
Expenditures
Fiscal Year
2025-26
Capital
Reserve
Contribution
Contribution
other than
Fiscal Year
2025-26
Assessment
Revenues
Fiscal Year
2025-26
Assessment
Revenue (1)
June 30, 2026
Fund Balance
available for
Operating
Reserves
94-1 Brentwood Country Club $23,669 ($1,119,481) ($4,590) $492,103 $655,448 $47,149 95-2 Hawthorne Landing $44,840 ($254,593) ($4,515) $154,663 $122,394 $62,789 95-3 Pheasant Run $356 ($11,097) $0 $2,343 $8,755 $356
95-4 Diablo Estates $14 ($10,413) $0 $2,225 $8,189 $14
95-5 California Spirit and Glory $54,350 ($322,565) ($3,756) $167,794 $168,398 $64,221 95-6 Gerry Ranch $6,399 ($62,476) ($410) $29,144 $41,006 $13,663 95-7 SPA D $18,368 ($214,656) ($2,990) $112,711 $118,191 $31,624 95-8 Garin Ranch $56,943 ($509,657) ($36,532) $276,151 $297,367 $84,272 97-1 Brentwood Lakes $53,035 ($479,477) ($5,626) $11,004 $474,100 $53,035 97-2 Marsh Creek Apartments ($20,352) ($44,630) $0 $58,515 $26,819 $20,352 97-3 Brentwood Park Apartments $207 ($40,924) $0 $35,892 $5,032 $207 98-3 Solana $5,752 ($44,599) ($254) $8,789 $36,235 $5,923 98-4 Birchwood Estates $13,144 ($50,934) ($1,259) $22,874 $31,456 $15,281 98-5 Arroyo Seco $926 ($40,946) $0 $10,394 $30,553 $926 99-3 SPA L $125,032 ($864,034) ($17,594) $312,152 $599,472 $155,028 99-4 California Grove $10,743 ($68,698) ($684) $28,565 $42,771 $12,697 99-5 Deer Ridge Country Club $187,929 ($804,747) ($18,728) $7,892 $815,584 $187,929 99-6 Trailside $8,890 ($58,679) ($1,180) $32,021 $27,838 $8,890 99-7 Termo $65,058 ($240,758) ($2,923) $92,355 $151,326 $65,058 99-8 Gerry Property $6,616 ($67,953) ($345) $272 $68,027 $6,616 99-9 Richmond American $56,329 ($210,518) ($3,820) $48,333 $166,005 $56,329 00-2 Lyon Woodfield ($64) ($57,741) ($515) $8,787 $54,109 $4,576 00-3 California Orchard $15,774 ($142,283) ($783) $647 $142,420 $15,774 00-4 Brentwood Park $30,654 ($159,167) ($4,304) $1,312 $162,160 $30,654 01-1 Laird Project $4,336 ($88,666) ($6) $6,388 $82,284 $4,336 02-2 Oakstreet $132,952 ($526,005) ($77,523) $6,869 $596,659 $132,952 02-3 Apricot Way $103,821 ($1,138,722) ($9,863) $4,350 $1,144,236 $103,821 02-4 Bradock & Logan $13,573 ($60,833) ($1,256) $2,217 $59,872 $13,573 02-5 Sand Creek & Brentwood Boulevard $1,252 ($99,700) $0 $50 $99,651 $1,252 02-6 Balfour & John Muir $3,461 ($47,772) ($319) $6,460 $41,632 $3,461 02-7 San Jose & Sand Creek $214 ($103,294) $0 $9 $103,285 $214 02-8 Lone Tree $12 ($53,706) $0 $0 $53,707 $12
02-9 Balfour Plaza $1,228 ($7,258) ($27) $50 $7,236 $1,228 02-10 Lone Tree Center $18 ($20,886) $0 $2,164 $18,723 $18 02-11 Lone Tree Plaza (Arcadia) $12 ($61,504) $0 $0 $61,505 $12 02-12 Sunset Industrial $9,243 ($70,854) ($4,407) $458 $74,804 $9,243 02-13 Stonehaven $778 ($25,723) ($67) $32 $25,758 $778
03-2 Meritage Lone Tree $226,341 ($1,491,251) ($21,589) $9,485 $1,503,355 $226,341 03-3 Brookdale Court $15,453 ($82,456) ($3,834) $695 $85,596 $15,453 03-4 Tri City Plaza $3 ($12,762) $0 $243 $12,519 $3
03-5 West Summerset $10,890 ($62,402) ($2,660) $489 $64,574 $10,890 03-6 Arbor Village $104 ($26,843) $0 $8,407 $18,572 $240 03-7 Garin Ranch Commercial $4 ($6,372) $0 $0 $6,372 $4 03-8 Blackhawk Commercial $46 ($33,971) $0 $2 $33,969 $46 04-2 Balfour-Griffith Commercial $3 ($7,650) $0 $262 $7,388 $3 05-2 South Brentwood Boulevard Commercial $1,198 ($17,273) $0 $9,355 $7,918 $1,198 06-2 Palmilla $76,884 ($451,566) ($15,828) $3,392 $464,003 $76,884 06-3 Vineyards $44,356 ($610,129) ($3,886) $1,852 $612,163 $44,356 06-4 Villa Amador $1 ($34,003) $0 $0 $34,004 $1
06-5 Barrington $86,770 ($566,845) ($14,510) $3,761 $577,594 $86,770 11-1 North Brentwood Boulevard $2,733 ($47,820) ($307) $14,313 $36,033 $4,952 14-1 Mission Grove $13,334 ($78,194) ($1,073) $555 $78,712 $13,334 14-2 Ferro-Ronconi $34,516 ($132,941) ($5,704) $1,495 $137,150 $34,516 15-1 Bella Fiore $5,795 ($88,002) ($7) $232 $87,777 $5,795 15-2 Renaissance Estates $5,558 ($18,132) ($149) $2,989 $15,293 $5,558 16-1 Bond Lane $19,227 ($87,575) ($4,403) $857 $91,122 $19,227 16-2 Sellers $19,766 ($111,429) ($1,028) $1,013 $111,444 $19,766 17-1 Sparrow $986 ($32,046) $0 $39 $32,008 $986
17-2 Catchings Ranch $8,809 ($27,204) ($345) $359 $27,191 $8,809 17-3 Cornerstone Fellowship $1 ($7,165) $0 $0 $7,166 $1 19-1 Terrene $11,371 ($198,413) ($6,451) $584 $204,281 $11,371 19-2 Alvernaz $9,969 ($103,019) ($5,117) $501 $107,635 $9,969 21-2 Orchard Trails $25,443 ($118,751) ($232) $1,749 $96,668 $4,877 21-3 Bennett Estates $6,279 ($20,978) ($28) $830 $18,796 $4,899 23-1 Orchard Grove $3,000 ($55,561) $0 $516 $64,940 $12,895 24-1 Hanson Lane $0 ($67,205) $0 $213 $71,434 $4,442
24-2 Trumark Trailside $0 ($83,385) $0 $923 $89,121 $6,659 24-3 Inez Estates $0 ($6,517) $0 $34 $7,048 $565
(1) Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

Page 178 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART C
.
-11-
PART C

ASSESSMENT DISTRICT DIAGRAM
The boundaries of each of the City of Brentwood’s Landscape & Lighting Districts are completely within the boundaries of the City of Brentwood. The consolidated Assessment Diagram for the sixty-eight (68) Assessment Districts is on file in the Office of the City Clerk of the City of Brentwood and shown on the following page of this Report. The assessor’s parcel numbers (APN) and lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within each District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the Contra Costa County Assessor, for the year when this Report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Report.

Page 179 of 790 ends

14-2
02-11
03-8
99-9
94-1N
99-7
99-5
94-1E
00-2
95-6 95-7
02-11
02-3
02-2
02-6
97-2
02-10
94-1S
06-2
06-4
15-2 21-3
14-1
19-2
19-2
02-3
06-3
03-2
16-2
17-2
17-1
16-1
17-3
15-1
02-7
97-1
95-8
06-2
00-3
97-3
05-2
02-3
00-4
02-5
06-5
04-2
99-8
03-2
99-4
03-2
99-3
03-2
03-3
95-2 95-5
02-9
98-4
02-9
03-7
11-1
03-6
01-1
99-6
03-4 02-8
02-4
95-4
95-3
98-3
02-13
03-5
21-2
23-1
98-5
02-12
24-1
24-3
24-2
City of Brentwood
Landscape & Lighting Assessment Districts
± 2,000 1,000 0 2,000 4,000
Feet
LEGEND
Parcel Lines City Limit
Landscape and Lighting Assessment Districts (LLADs)
15-1
15-2
16-1
16-2
14-1
14-2
03-3
03-4
03-5
03-6
03-7
03-8
04-2
05-2
06-2
06-3
06-4
06-5
11-1
99-8
99-9
00-2
00-3
00-4
01-1
02-2
02-3
02-4
02-5
02-6
02-7
02-8
02-9
02-10
02-11
02-12
02-13
03-2
94-1
95-2
95-3
95-4
95-5
95-6
95-7
95-8
97-1
97-2
97-3
98-3
98-4
98-5
99-3
99-4
99-5
99-6
99-7
17-3
17-2
19-1
19-2
21-2
21-3
17-1
23-1
24-1
24-2
24-3

Page 180 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
.
-13-
PART D

METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF ASSESSMENT
Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, permits the establishment of assessment districts by Agencies for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the operation, maintenance, servicing, and replacement of streetlights, landscaping, trails, open space, and park improvements.

Section 22573 of the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value.

This Section states:
"The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements.”
As a benefit-based assessment, parcels receiving benefit from improvements maintained by the Districts are subject to the assessment and will not be exempted if benefit is received. The improvements provided by these Districts and for which properties will be assessed have been identified as necessary, required and/or desired for the orderly development of the properties within each District to their full potential, consistent with the development plans and applicable portions of the City General Plan. As such, these improvements would be necessary and required of individual property owners for the development of such properties and the ongoing operation, servicing and maintenance of these improvements would be the financial obligation of those properties. Therefore, the improvements and the annual costs of ensuring the maintenance and operation of the improvements are a distinct and special benefit to the properties within the Districts. In addition, Article XIIID, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Because assessments are levied on the basis of benefit, they are not considered a tax, and therefore, are not governed by Article XIIIA of the California Constitution.

The 1972 Act permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement" (Sec. 22574). Thus, the 1972 Act requires the levy of a true "assessment" rather than a "special tax."
Article XIIID provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways (all of which are

Page 181 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
.
-14-
typically not assigned an APN by the County), and that portion of public property that is not developed and used for business purposes similar to private commercial, industrial, and institutional activities (such as office buildings like a City Hall, etc.). Also exempted from the assessment would be utility rights-of-ways, common areas (such as in condominium complexes), and any other property that is deemed to be unable to develop by the City. These types of parcels do not benefit from the improvements.

QUANTIFICATION OF BENEFIT
Each District provides a funding source for the operation, maintenance, servicing and replacement of street lighting, landscaping, recreation/trail, and park improvements authorized under the statute and that benefit properties within the boundaries of each District.

In order for the City to separate out the general and special benefits for each improvement type, an analysis of each improvement was conducted. The analysis reviewed the purpose and users of each improvement, and then identified the properties that benefit from the improvement both within and outside the City and within and outside each District, and then allocated the costs to maintain, service, and replace each improvement type to each identified property.

Because general benefits are not assessable, any costs associated with general benefits or special benefits assigned to properties (both within and outside and the City) not in a District are to be paid for by the City. Only the costs associated with the special benefits conferred on property within each District from the authorized improvements are assessable, and therefore assessed herein. A summary of the analysis by improvement type is described below.

STREET LIGHTING ALONG ARTERIAL AND MAJOR ROADWAYS
Street lighting located along the City’s arterial and major roadways provides a benefit to parcels inside and outside the City. The benefits from streetlights are enhanced illumination which allows for:
• Safer vehicle and pedestrian access to and from property. • Enhanced deterrence of criminal or suspicious activity such as property theft, vandalism, criminal activity, illegal dumping, and damage to improvements and property.
• Improved ability of pedestrians and motorists to see. • Improved traffic circulation and reduced nighttime accidents and personal property loss.
• Increased nighttime visibility resulting in enhanced safety on roads, streets, and in public areas.

To determine which properties benefit from street lighting along the City’s arterial and major roadways a benefit analysis was performed. The analysis utilized Google Maps to determine which arterial and major roadways within the City were most likely to be used by property owners/residents when driving or walking to various destinations inside and outside of the City. The analysis showed that all properties within the City would utilize the

Page 182 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
.
-15-
City’s arterial and major roadway system when traveling to destinations within the City or to other cities and communities. The analysis also found that there are additional properties located outside the City limits that would utilize the City’s arterial and major roadway system when traveling through the City to various destinations outside the City.

Vehicular or pedestrian traffic flow commencing outside of the City but traveling to a destination inside the City was determined to be a special benefit to the destination parcel within the City. The analysis used each parcel’s physical location as a starting destination and then selected ending destinations were inputted (e.g., neighboring cities or communities surrounding the City of Brentwood). If Google Maps showed the property owner/resident located outside the City would pass through and utilize the City’s arterial and major roadway system to travel to a destination outside of the City, then they were considered to receive a benefit from the City’s arterial and major roadway system. In addition, the analysis showed that most parcels outside of the City did not benefit from the improvements because they did not utilize the City’s roadways to travel to a destination parcel outside of the City, but would in most circumstances, if not all rather utilize Highway 4 to traverse the City or use an alternative route, therefore circumventing the City’s arterial and major roadways.

In addition to the special and direct benefits the property owners within the City receive from these enhanced street lighting improvements, there are also some incidental general benefits received by vehicular and pedestrian flow-through traffic (traffic that does not stop within the City) which originates from properties outside the City limits from individuals who use the City’s arterial and major roadway system to travel to another destination outside of the City. It has been determined that some properties not located within the City, north of the City limits, utilize arterial and major roadways within the City when traveling to destinations south of the City and that some properties not located within City, south and east of the City limits, utilize arterial and major roadways within the City when traveling to a destination north of the City. Properties meeting these criteria have been identified and such benefits must be accounted for and cannot be assessed to the properties within the Districts.

To quantify and separate the special benefits received by property owners within the City limits and the general benefit received by the property owners outside the City, Equivalent Dwelling Units (EDUs) were assigned to all benefitting properties (both inside and outside the City). The analysis resulted in a benefit boundary being drawn and EDUs being assigned to one of three categories of parcels: special benefits assigned to properties that lie within the City and not in a District, special benefits assigned to properties that lie within the City and in a District, and general benefits assigned to properties that lie outside the City.

It was determined that 2.81% of the EDUs were assigned to properties located outside of the City. Therefore, it is estimated that 97.19% of the annual cost to operate, maintain, service and replace the arterial and major roadway street lighting would be a special and direct benefit to the parcels within the City and 2.81% of the annual cost to operate, maintain, service and replace the arterial and major roadway street lighting would be a general benefit. However, only 75.84% of the total EDUs were assigned for special benefits to parcels in the City and in a District, therefore only 75.84% of the costs can be

Page 183 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
.
-16-
allocated to parcels in Districts, and the remaining 24.16% of benefits (special benefits assigned to property in the City and not in a District and general benefits) will be paid by the City.

LANDSCAPING ALONG ARTERIAL AND MAJOR ROADWAYS
Landscaping located along the City’s arterial and major roadways provides a benefit to parcels within and outside the City. The benefits from landscaping include enhanced beautification which allows for:
• Enhanced desirability of property through association with the improvements. • Improved aesthetic appeal of properties providing a positive representation of the area and properties.
• Enhanced beautification to the adjacent developments. • Increased sense of pride in ownership of property within the Districts resulting from well-maintained improvements associated with the properties. • Enhanced quality of life through well-maintained green space and landscaped areas.
• Reduced criminal activity and property-related crimes (especially vandalism) against properties in the District through well-maintained surroundings and amenities including abatement of graffiti.
• Environmental enhancement through improved erosion resistance, dust and debris control, and fire prevention.
• Enhanced environmental quality of the parcels by moderating temperatures, providing oxygenation, and attenuating noise.

To determine which properties benefit from landscaping along the City’s arterial and major roadways a benefit analysis was performed. The analysis utilized Google Maps to determine which arterial and major roadways within the City were most likely to be used by property owners/residents when driving or walking to various destinations inside and outside of the City. The analysis showed that all properties within the City would utilize the City’s arterial and major roadway system when traveling to destinations within the City or to other cities and communities. The analysis also found that there are additional properties located outside the City limits that would utilize the City’s arterial and major roadway system when traveling through the City to various destinations outside the City.

Vehicular or pedestrian traffic flow commencing outside of the City but traveling to a destination inside the City was determined to be a special benefit to the destination parcel within the City. The analysis used each parcel’s physical location as a starting destination and then selected ending destinations were inputted (e.g., neighboring cities or communities surrounding the City of Brentwood). If Google Maps showed the property owner/resident located outside the City would pass through and utilize the City’s arterial and major roadway system to travel to a destination outside of the City, then they were considered to receive a benefit from the City’s arterial and major roadway system. In addition, the analysis showed that most parcels outside of the City did not benefit from the improvements because they did not utilize the City’s roadways to travel to a destination parcel outside of the City, but would in most circumstances, if not all rather utilize Highway 4 to traverse the City or use an alternative route, therefore circumventing the City’s arterial and major roadways.

Page 184 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
.
-17-
In addition to the special and direct benefits the property owners within the City receive from these enhanced landscaping improvements, there are also some incidental general benefits received by vehicular and pedestrian flow-through traffic (traffic that does not stop within the City) which originates from properties outside the City limits from individuals who use the City’s arterial and major roadway system to travel to another destination outside of the City. It has been determined that some properties not located within the City, north of the City limits, utilize arterial and major roadways within the City when traveling to destinations south of the City and that some properties not located within City, south and east of the City limits, utilize arterial and major roadways within the City when traveling to a destination north of the City. Properties meeting these criteria have been identified and such benefits must be accounted for and cannot be assessed to the properties within the District.

To quantify and separate the special benefits received by property owners within the City limits and the general benefit received by the property owners outside the City, EDUs were assigned to all benefiting properties (both inside and outside the City). The analysis resulted in a benefit boundary being drawn and EDUs being assigned to one of three categories of parcels: special benefits assigned to properties that lie within the City and not in a District, special benefits assigned to properties that lie within the City and in a District, and general benefits assigned to properties that lie outside the City. It was determined that parcels within the categories that are not in a District benefit less than parcels within the Districts due to the proximity of the landscaping to the properties within the Districts. This finding resulted in the EDUs assigned to parcels in the City and not in a District and parcels outside the City being reduced by 50%.

It was determined that 1.63% of the EDUs were assigned to properties located outside of the City. Therefore, it is estimated that 98.37% of the annual cost to operate, maintain, service and replace the arterial and major roadway landscaping would be a special and direct benefit to the parcels within the City and 1.63% of the annual cost to operate, maintain, service and replace the arterial and major roadway landscaping would be a general benefit. However, only 86.23% of the total EDUs were assigned for special benefits to parcels in the City and in a District, therefore only 86.23% of the costs can be allocated to parcels in Districts, and the remaining 13.77% of benefits (special benefits assigned to property in the City and not in a District and general benefits) will be paid by the City.

GRANT STREET TRAIL
Grant Street trail provides special and direct benefits to the parcels located within a certain proximity to the trail. These special and direct benefits consist of enhanced recreational opportunities such as walking, jogging, biking, etc. within and along their developments.

These benefits allow for:
• Increases in options to exercise and incorporate recreational opportunities into daily routines.

Page 185 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
.
-18-
• Increases in opportunities to travel and connect with places people may need or want to go.
• Enhanced environmental opportunities because of improvement in air quality due to people utilizing the trail verse driving to nearby destinations. • Specific enhancements in property values due to the increase in walkability of an area and the increase in amenities.

In addition, the trail provides general benefits to the public-at-large since this is a public trail system and anyone from the public can access it. To determine who was using the trail, City’s Parks and Recreation Department staff performed a trail user survey over multiple days at different times and locations along the trail over a three-month period.

Based upon their survey findings, ninety-three percent (93%) of the trail users were benefitting property owners located both within the City and those outside the City limits, who lived within a ½-mile (+/-) of the trail. Therefore, it is estimated that 93.00% of the annual cost to operate, maintain, service and replace the trail improvements would be a special and direct benefit to the parcels within the ½-mile radius (+/-) both within and outside the City and 7.00% of the annual cost to operate, maintain, service and replace the trail improvements would be a general benefit. Special benefits assigned to properties that lie within ½ mile (+/-) of the trail that are not within a District (in or outside the City), are special benefits that will be paid by the City because they cannot be assessed in the Districts. Only the benefits associated with properties within the City and within a District that are within the ½ distance (+/-) of the trail will be assessed to the Districts.

PARK FACILITES
The City of Brentwood’s General Plan policy is aimed at ensuring that recreational opportunities will continue to exist throughout the City and that an adequate park system continues to be developed and maintained to serve the City. In keeping with these policies, the City Council formed a Citywide assessment district for park maintenance in 1997 to secure a funding mechanism for a portion of the benefits and associated costs to maintain community parks and neighborhood parks. In addition, the Districts were also established to fund park costs associated with each benefiting property for the community and neighborhood parks that could not be funded from the Citywide Park District. For the purposes of this report, community parks are defined as typically being larger parks that are designed with amenities to serve the City as a whole as described further in the Parks, Trails and Recreation Master Plan originally approved on August 23, 1994 and subsequently approved on June 25, 2002. Neighborhood parks are defined as being generally smaller than community parks and typically benefit those residents located within a one-half mile radius from the park and as further defined within the Parks, Trails and Recreation Master Plan previously referenced.

There are 99 Parks spread throughout the City serving a population of approximately 65,000 residents. Community and neighborhood parks provide a special and direct benefit to the parcels within the City. The special and direct benefit to the parcels consists of enhanced recreational opportunities, including baseball, soccer, swimming, basketball, walking, jogging, etc. and the use of improvements such as: picnic tables, barbequing, playground equipment, community center rooms, green spaces, benches, bioswales, etc.

Page 186 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
.
-19-
The parks and the associated recreational opportunities provide for more aesthetically pleasing neighborhoods, environmental and health benefits, community gathering places, and an overall improved and healthier community image, etc. If these park improvements were not installed, property within the Districts would not look as appealing to property owners, prospective property buyers, and patrons alike, which would adversely affect the value of their property. Based on the Parks and Economic Development Report published in the American Planning Association, homes adjacent and near parks and open space are typically valued at 8-20% higher than comparable properties, with positive price effect declining to zero about ½ mile away. Therefore, park improvements provide a special and direct benefit to property located within ½ miles of park improvements.

Furthermore, the Brentwood Parks, Trails, and Recreation Master Plan development guidelines as previously referenced herein, states that, neighborhood parks should service residents within a ½ mile +/- radius or approximately 1,000 to 2,000 people. The City maintains on average one neighborhood park per 800 residents. In addition to the special and direct benefits the property owners receive within the City from these enhanced park improvements, there are also some incidental benefits received by residents located from outside the City that may utilize the City’s community and neighborhood parks. Even though these are incidental benefits, they must be accounted for and cannot be assessed to the properties within the Districts.

Based on park user data, it is conservatively estimated that approximately 95% of the benefits associated with community parks are of benefit to property within the City and 98% of the benefits associated with neighborhood parks are of a special and direct benefit to properties within ½ mile distance (+/-). Therefore, 95% of the costs to annually operate, maintain, service and replace the community parks and 98% of the costs to annually operate, maintain, service and replace the neighborhood parks would be a special and direct benefit to the parcels within the City, and 5% and 2%, respectively of the annual costs to operate, maintain, service and replace the parks would be a general benefit.

Page 187 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
.
-20-

LOCAL IN-TRACT STREET LIGHTING
To determine which properties benefit from in-tract or development specific street lighting a benefit analysis was performed. Street lighting located along and adjacent to the in-tract streets provides a special and direct benefit to parcels within the developments. The special and direct benefits from streetlights within the development consists of enhanced illumination which allows for safer vehicle and pedestrian access to and from property. In addition, this enhanced illumination helps deter criminal or suspicious activity such as property theft, vandalism, illegal dumping, etc.

Since the in-tract streets within the development are designed to have minimal flow through traffic, there are few reasons for vehicles to access the in-tract streets unless their destination is to or from a single-family residential parcel within the development.

However, it is reasonable to conclude that some vehicular traffic may on a rare occasion utilize the in-tract streets due to the need to turn around or a mistaken turn into the development. The rare circumstance where a pedestrian or vehicle mistakenly uses the in-tract streets, have been determined to be a rare and infrequent circumstance. Even though these are rare and infrequent circumstances, they must be accounted for and cannot be assessed to the properties within the Districts. Therefore, based on flow-through traffic it is conservatively estimated that approximately 98% of the annual trips along local in-tract roadways within the development would be a special and direct benefit to the parcels within the Districts and 2% of the annual trips along local in-tract roadways within the development would be a general benefit.

To quantify and separate the special benefits received by all property within the development EDUs were assigned to all benefitting properties inside the development as identified. It was determined that 2.00% of the cost to operate, maintain, service and replace the in-tract street lighting were assigned to properties located outside of the development. Therefore, it is estimated that 98.00% of the annual cost to operate, maintain, service and replace the in-tract street lighting would be a special and direct benefit to the parcels within each development and 2.00% of the annual cost to operate, maintain, service and replace the in-tract street lighting would be a general benefit.

LOCAL IN-TRACT LANDSCAPING
To determine which properties benefit from in-tract or development specific landscaping a benefit analysis was performed. Landscaping located along and adjacent to the in-tract streets provides a special and direct benefit to parcels within the development. The special and direct benefits from in-tract landscaping within the development consists of enhanced beautification to the entrances and along the roadsides within the development. Property owners who reside within these developments realize this enhanced aesthetic benefit when they are entering and exiting the development. If these in-tract landscape improvements were not installed, the developments would not look as appealing to property owners and prospective property buyers which would adversely affect the value of their property. Therefore, these landscape improvements provide a specific enhancement to their property values and not a general enhancement of property values.

Page 188 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
.
-21-
Since the in-tract streets within the development are designed to have minimal flow through traffic, there are few reasons for vehicles to access the in-tract streets unless their destination is to or from a single-family residential parcel within the development.

However, it is reasonable to conclude that some vehicular traffic may on a rare occasion utilize the in-tract streets due to the need to turn around or a mistaken turn into the development. The rare circumstance where a pedestrian or vehicle mistakenly uses the in-tract streets, have been determined to be a rare and infrequent circumstance. Even though these are rare and infrequent circumstances, they must be accounted for and cannot be assessed to the properties within the Districts. Therefore, based on flow-through traffic it is conservatively estimated that approximately 98% of the annual trips along local in-tract roadways within the development would be a special and direct benefit to the parcels within the Districts and 2% of the annual trips along local in-tract roadways within the development would be a general benefit.

To quantify and separate the special benefits received by all property within the development EDUs were assigned was applied to all benefitting properties inside the development as identified. It was determined that 2.00% of the cost to operate, maintain, service and replace the in-tract landscaping were assigned to properties located outside of the development. Therefore, it is estimated that 98.00% of the annual cost to operate, maintain, service and replace the in-tract landscaping would be a special and direct benefit to the parcels within the development and 2.00% of the annual cost to operate, maintain, service and replace the in-tract landscaping would be a general benefit.

ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY
The total operation, maintenance and servicing costs for the landscaping, street lighting, parks, open space, and trail improvements are apportioned in accordance with a methodology that is consistent with standard assessment engineering practices. The specific method of apportioning the costs of the improvements to the benefiting parcels for each of the Districts is in accordance with the methodology developed and approved by the property owners at the time of each District’s formation.

As certain subdivisions have developed and continue to develop throughout the City of Brentwood, they may be annexed into an existing District or a new District may be created.

Each new subdivision is evaluated to determine which improvements are of a specific and direct benefit to the parcels within the subdivision and then a determination is made whether to annex them into an existing District or form a new District. The parcels, which benefit from the improvements, are then identified and a benefit assessment methodology is developed to allocate the costs of the improvements to the benefiting parcels.

As a benefit-based assessment, parcels receiving benefit from improvements maintained by the Districts are subject to the assessment and will not be exempted if benefit is received.

Since the assessments are levied on the owners of properties as shown on the secured property tax rolls, the final charges must be assigned by Assessor's Parcel Number. If assessments were to be allocated by parcel, not considering land use, benefit would not

Page 189 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
.
-22-
be allocated accurately, because a single-family parcel would be paying the same as a 50-unit apartment parcel or a large commercial establishment. Therefore, as previously stated, the total assessment costs are allocated to each parcel of land based on the benefit received by each parcel. The assessment methodology is generally explained below and then in greater detail in each individual District’s methodology on the following pages.

The assessment methodology utilizes the EDU methodology as discussed below.

Single-Family Residential Parcels - The single-family residential parcel has been selected as the basic unit for the calculation of assessments since it represents approximately 90% of the parcels within the City. Therefore, the single-family residential parcel is defined as one (1.00) Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU) per parcel. The assessment methodology used to assign EDUs to other land uses in proportion to the special benefit they receive relative to the single-family residential parcel is discussed below.

Condominium, Townhome and Mobile Home Parcels - Condominiums, townhomes and mobile homes on average have approximately 75% of the building square footage compared to a single-family home. Furthermore, studies consistently show that these types of residential products impact public infrastructure approximately 75% as much as a single-family residential parcel. Therefore, all condominium, townhome and mobile home parcels are assessed 0.75 EDUs per parcel.

Multi-Family Residential Units - Multi-family residential units on average have approximately 50% of the building square footage compared to a single-family home.

Furthermore, studies consistently show that multi-family residential units impact public infrastructure approximately 50% as much as a single-family home. Therefore, all multifamily parcels are assessed 0.50 EDUs per unit.

Non-Residential Parcels - Commercial, industrial, institutional, and other non-residential properties are assessed at three (3) EDUs per acre of land. The 3.00 EDU per acre allocation is based upon the average size of a single-family parcel in the City of Brentwood which is approximately 1/6 of an acre. For every acre of non-residential land approximately 6 single-family homes could be constructed on that acre of land which would equate to

6.00 EDUs per acre. Furthermore, it was determined that Non-Residential parcels benefit less than residential properties from the authorized improvements because their employees have less time and opportunity to use and benefit from the improvements, than residents who live within the City. Employees typically benefit from or may use the improvements before work, during breaks and at lunch, or after work. Residents have the ability to use the improvements during the same times and on weekends and holidays, since they reside in the area. Based on this information, it is reasonable to assume that for non-residential property the opportunity to use and benefit from the improvements is approximately 50% of that realized by residential properties. Therefore, EDUs assigned to non-residential property are assessed three (3) EDUs per acre of land because they have been discounted by 50% to account for the differences in benefit from improvements conferred on residential and non-residential property.

Page 190 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
.
-23-
Undeveloped Parcels – All undeveloped properties are assessed at 25% of the developed EDUs assigned for each parcel of land based on the properties land use classification.

Undeveloped properties benefit less from the improvements than developed property because undeveloped properties do not have structures which house residents or utilize employees. However, the improvements funded by the Districts do benefit undeveloped property because improvements have already been installed that allows for development to occur and to use the improvements immediately upon the initiation of development making the property more attractive. Based on this information, it is reasonable to assume that undeveloped property benefits less than developed property. To determine the difference in special benefit conferred on developed and undeveloped property, the Contra Costa County Assessor’s assessed values for property within the City were reviewed to determine what percentage of assessed value is typically associated with the underlying land and what percentage is typically associated with the structure. Based upon the review, it was determined that approximately 25% of the assessed value of developed property in the City is associated with the underlying land. Based on the comparison of benefits of developed property to undeveloped property it is reasonable to assess the undeveloped property at 25% of the rate for developed property. Therefore, EDUs assigned to undeveloped residential and non-residential property have been discounted by 75% to account for the differences in benefit from improvements conferred on developed and undeveloped property.

Exempt Parcels - Publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the improvements. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways (all of which are typically not assigned an APN by the County), and that portion of public property that is not developed and used for business purposes similar to private commercial, industrial, and institutional activities (such as office buildings like a City Hall, etc.). Also exempted from the assessment would be utility rights-of-ways, common areas (such as in condominium complexes), and any other property that is deemed to be unable to develop by the City. These types of parcels do not benefit from the improvements. Also exempted from the assessments are private streets, utility easements, HOA common areas (except club houses, community centers, parking lots, etc.) and any other parcels that do not receive a special and direct benefit from the improvements.

Furthermore, parcels within each District may be assessed as developed once the final maps have been approved by the City of Brentwood and or it is anticipated that improvements will need to be maintained or reserve funds will need to be collected for the ensuing fiscal year.

Adjustment of Assessments
Any property owner who demonstrates that the amount of their assessment is in error as a result of incorrect information being used to apply the foregoing method of spread, may file a written appeal with the Director of Parks and Recreation. Any such appeal is limited to correction of an assessment during the then current or, if before July 1, the upcoming

Page 191 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
.
-24-
fiscal year. Upon the filing of any such appeal, the Director of Parks and Recreation shall promptly review the information provided by the property owner and if he/she finds that the assessment should be modified, the Director of Parks and Recreation shall have the authority to make the appropriate changes in the assessment roll. If any such changes are approved after the assessment roll has been filed with the County for collection, the Director of Parks and Recreation is authorized to refund to the property owner the amount of any approved reduction if the District reserve is adequate. Claims against the City for adjustments not granted by the Director of Parks and Recreation shall be governed by the City’s written claim procedures under the Tort Claims Act (Government Code Section 810 and following).

Following is a listing of the various Districts, their corresponding number and type of parcels/units/acres within each District, Fiscal Year 2025-26 maximum assessment rates, and Fiscal Year 2025-26 applied assessment rates along with the amount proposed to be assessed and placed on the Contra Costa County secured property tax roll. The amount to be assessed was determined by taking into account general benefits and any other contributions by the City. The amount to be assessed is then divided by the applicable number of EDUs as defined herein to calculate the applied Fiscal Year 2025-26 assessment rate. Under no circumstance may a District levy an amount that exceeds the maximum assessment rate for the applicable fiscal year.

Assessment District 94-1 North, South, East, East-Com (Brentwood Country Club) - Subdivisions 6848, 7642, 7816, 7869, 7870, 7871, 7872, 7873, 7939, 7940, 8017, 8022, 8081, 8082, 8083, 8084, 8085, 8088, 8089, 8462, & DR01-34. DR04-34 was annexed in Fiscal Year 2006-07.

Assessment District No. 94-1 was formed in 1994, has four (4) zones of benefit, and is comprised of 839 single-family residential parcels, one vacant single-family parcel, and one institutional parcel north of Balfour (NORTH); 1,336 single-family residential parcels and two commercial parcels south of Balfour (SOUTH); 329 single-family residential parcels south of Balfour and east of Fairview (EAST); and 11 commercial parcels located at the south and northeast corner of Balfour and Fairview (EASTCOM).

Single family parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel. Commercial parcels are assessed at 3.00 EDUs/acre.

This Assessment District set maximum assessment rates per equivalent dwelling unit (EDU) for both the NORTH and SOUTH zones with an allowance for a 2% increase each fiscal year.

The Zone EAST-COM was annexed in Fiscal Year 2003-04 for commercial property.

The maximum assessment rate established at formation included maintenance of certain areas that are currently maintained by the property owner, however if the property owner fails to maintain their landscaping improvements to City of Brentwood standards, then the maximum assessment rate was thought to be set high enough for the City to step in and maintain the improvements and assess the property owner for these costs. The assessment rate has been set under the assumption that the property

Page 192 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
.
-25-
owner will continue to maintain these specific improvements and the City will maintain all other intended improvements as identified at the time of annexation.

Zones EAST and EAST-COM also have an allowance for a minimum of 2% CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year of June 30, 2003).

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 860.21 EDUs in NORTH Zone; 1,353.66 EDUs in SOUTH Zone; 329.00 EDUs in EAST Zone; and 52.62 EDUs in EAST-COM Zone that are assessable and the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $655,448 (as shown in Appendix A).

Therefore, the current assessment rates for Fiscal Year 2025-26 are as follows:
• parcels NORTH of Balfour are $247.50/EDU.
• parcels SOUTH of Balfour are $205.42/EDU.
• parcels EAST of Fairview are $441.37/EDU.
• parcels EAST COM of Fairview are $366.07/EDU.

Assessment District 95-2 (Hawthorn Landing) - Subdivision 7369, 8066, 8242 & 8371 (8608).

Assessment District No. 95-2 is comprised of 323 single-family residential parcels.

This Assessment District was formed in 1995 and the maximum assessment rate was set with an allowance for a 2% increase each fiscal year. Single-family parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 323.00 EDU that are assessable. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $122,394 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $378.93/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $378.93/EDU

Page 193 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
.
-26-
Assessment District 95-3 (Pheasant Run) - Subdivision 7349.

Assessment District No. 95-3 is comprised of 26 single-family residential parcels. This Assessment District was formed in 1995 and the maximum assessment rate was set with an allowance for a 2% increase each fiscal year. Single-family parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel.

In Fiscal Year 1997-98 the property owners within Assessment District No. 95-3 elected to operate and maintain their improvements through the establishment of a Homeowner Association. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 it is anticipated that all local improvements will be maintained through the Homeowners Association. However, the parcels will be assessed for citywide improvements and the capital replacement costs associated with the public improvements. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 26.00 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed within the Assessment District is 8,755 (as shown in Appendix A). If the homeowner association fails to properly operate and maintain the improvements within Assessment District No. 95-3, the City Council has the discretion to levy assessments up to the authorized maximum assessment rate.

Maximum Rate: $438.94/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $336.73/EDU
Assessment District 95-4 (Diablo Estates) - Subdivision 7272.

Assessment District No. 95-4 is comprised of 26 single-family residential parcels. This Assessment District was formed in 1995 and the maximum assessment rate was with an allowance for a 2% increase each fiscal year. Single-family parcels are assessed at

1.00 EDU/parcel.

In Fiscal Year 1999-00 the property owners within Assessment District No. 95-4 elected to operate and maintain their improvements through the establishment of a Homeowner Association. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 it is anticipated that all local improvements will be maintained through the Homeowners Association. However, the parcels will be assessed for citywide improvements and the capital replacement costs associated with the public improvements. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 26.00 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed within the Assessment District is $8189 (as shown in Appendix A). If the Homeowner Association fails to properly operate and maintain the improvements within Assessment District No. 95-4, the City Council has the discretion to levy assessments up to the authorized maximum assessment rate.

Maximum Rate: $447.20/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $314.93/EDU

Page 194 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
.
-27-
Assessment District 95-5 (California Spirit and Glory) - Subdivisions 7736, 7802, 8383, & 8411.

Assessment District No. 95-5 is comprised of 486 single-family residential parcels.

This Assessment District was formed in 1995 and the maximum assessment rate was with an allowance for a 2% increase each fiscal year. Single-family parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 486.00 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $168,398 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $346.50/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $346.50/EDU
Assessment District 95-6 (Gerry Ranch) - Subdivisions 7059 & 7915.

Assessment District No. 95-6 is comprised of 88 single-family residential parcels. This Assessment District was formed in 1995 and the maximum assessment rate was set with an allowance for a 2% increase each fiscal year. Single-family parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 88.00 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $41,006 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $465.98/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $465.98/EDU

Page 195 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
.
-28-
Assessment District 95-7 (SPA ‘D’) - Subdivisions 7948, 7950, 7995, 8011 & CUP00-

06. Assessment District No. 95-7 is comprised of 373 single-family residential parcels and a 3.187-acre commercial parcel. This Assessment District was formed in 1995 and the maximum assessment rate was set with an allowance for a 2% increase each fiscal year. Single-family parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel and commercial parcels are assessed at 3.00 EDUs/acre.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 382.56 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $118,191 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $308.95/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $308.95/EDU
Assessment District 95-8 (Garin Ranch) - Subdivisions 7798, 7799, 8009, 8010, 8138, 8221, 8222, 8425, 8537 & 8609. Subdivisions 8426, 8627, & 8840 were Annexed MidYear Fiscal Year 2003-04.

Assessment District No. 95-8 is comprised of 854 single-family residential parcels. This Assessment District was formed in 1995 and the maximum assessment rate was set with an allowance for a 2% increase each fiscal year. Single-family parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel and vacant single-family parcels are assessed at 0.25 EDU/parcel.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 854.00 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $297,367 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $348.20/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $348.20/EDU

Page 196 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
.
-29-
Assessment District 97-1 (Brentwood Lakes) - Subdivisions 7705, 8063, 8209, 8210, 8305, 8322, 8373, 8374, 8375 & 8659 (8344) and DR04-37 was annexed in Fiscal Year 2006-07.

Assessment District No. 97-1 is comprised of 922 single-family residential parcels and four commercial parcels. This Assessment District was formed in 1997 and the maximum assessment rate was set with an allowance for a 2% increase each fiscal year. Single-family parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel, and commercial parcels are assessed at 3.00 EDU/acre.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 941.55 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $474,100 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $503.53/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $503.53/EDU
Assessment District 97-2 (Marsh Creek Apartments) – MS 355-96.

Assessment District No. 97-2 is comprised of one multi-family residential parcel consisting of 126 apartment units. This Assessment District was formed in 1997 and the maximum assessment rate was set with an allowance for a 2% increase each fiscal year.

In Fiscal Year 2001-02 the property owners within Assessment District No. 97-2 elected to operate and maintain their improvements through a property management association. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 it is anticipated that all local improvements will be maintained through the property management association. However, the parcel will be assessed for citywide improvements and the capital replacement costs associated with the public improvements. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 63.00 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed within the Assessment District is $26,819 (as shown in Appendix A). If the property management association fails to properly operate and maintain the improvements within Assessment District No. 97-2, the City Council has the discretion to levy assessments up to the authorized maximum assessment rate.

Maximum Rate: $486.38/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $425.70/EDU

Page 197 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
.
-30-
Assessment District 97-3 (Brentwood Park Apartments) – MS 361-97.

Assessment District No. 97-3 is comprised of two multi-family residential parcels consisting of 160 apartment units. This Assessment District was formed in 1997 and the maximum assessment rate was set with an allowance for a 2% increase each fiscal year.

In Fiscal Year 2002-03 the property owners within Assessment District No. 97-3 elected to operate and maintain their improvements. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 it is anticipated that all local improvements will be maintained by the property owner. However, the parcels will be assessed for citywide improvements and the capital replacement costs associated with the public improvements. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 80.00 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed within the Assessment District is $5,032 (as shown in Appendix A). If the apartment complex fails to properly operate and maintain the improvements within Assessment District No. 97-3, the City Council has the discretion to levy assessments up to the authorized maximum assessment rate.

Maximum Rate: $69.64/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $62.89/EDU
Assessment District 98-3 (Solana) - Subdivision 6811.

Assessment District No. 98-3 is comprised of 82 single-family residential parcels. This Assessment District was formed in 1998 and the maximum assessment rate was with an allowance for a 2% increase each fiscal year. Single-family parcels are assessed at

1.00 EDU/parcel.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 82.00 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $36,235 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $441.88/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $441.88/EDU

Page 198 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
.
-31-
Assessment District 98-4 (Birchwood Estates) - Subdivision 8048.

Assessment District No. 98-4 is comprised of 51 single-family residential parcels. This Assessment District was formed in 1998 and the maximum assessment rate was set with an allowance for a 2% increase each fiscal year. Single-family parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 51.00 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $31,456 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $616.78/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $616.78/EDU
Assessment District 98-5 (Arroyo Seco) - Subdivision 7476.

Assessment District No. 98-5 is comprised of 65 single-family residential parcels. This Assessment District was formed in 1998 and the maximum assessment rate was set with an allowance for a 2% increase each fiscal year. Single family parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 65.00 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $30,553 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $470.04/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $470.04/EDU

Page 199 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
.
-32-
Assessment District 99-3 (Spa ‘L’) - Subdivisions 8033, 8055, 8069, 8146, 8147, 8172, 8176, 8178, 8195, 8196, 8197, 8225, 8395, 8697, 8460, & 8453. Subdivision 8529 was annexed in Fiscal Year 2004-05 & Subdivision 8808 was annexed in Fiscal Year 2005-06.

Assessment District No. 99-3 is comprised of 985 single-family residential parcels and two vacant single-family residential parcels. This Assessment District was formed in Fiscal Year 1999-00 and the maximum assessment rate was set with an allowance for a 2% increase each fiscal year. Single-family parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel and vacant single-family properties are assessed at 0.25 EDU/parcel.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 986.25 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $599,472 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $607.83/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $607.83/EDU
Assessment District 99-4 (California Grove) - Subdivision 8046.

Assessment District No. 99-4 is comprised of 72 single-family residential parcels. This Assessment District was formed in Fiscal Year 1999-00 and the maximum assessment rate was set with an allowance for a 2% increase each fiscal year. Single-family parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 72.00 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $42,771 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $594.05/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $594.05/EDU

Page 200 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
.
-33-
Assessment District 99-5 (Deer Ridge Country Club) – Subdivisions 8253, 8478, 8479, 8480, 8481, 8482, 8483, 8484, 8485, 8486, 8488, 8829, 8490, 8489, 8491, 8492, 8493, 8494, 8495, 8277, 8278, & 8545. Subdivision 8352 was annexed mid-year Fiscal Year 2002-03.

Assessment District No. 99-5 is comprised of 1,056 single-family residential parcels, one commercial parcel, and one institutional parcel totaling 8.68 acres. This Assessment District was formed in Fiscal Year 1999-00; however, the maximum assessment rate was increased through a ballot process in Fiscal Year 2002-03 with an allowance for a minimum of a 2% CPI increase each fiscal year. The CPI increase is based upon the annual change in the Consumer Price Index for the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners as of (base year June 30, 2002). Single-family parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel, and commercial/institutional parcels are assessed at 3.00 EDUs/acre.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 1,082.04 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $815,584 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $979.25/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $753.75/EDU
Assessment District 99-6 (Trailside) - Subdivision 7975.

Assessment District No. 99-6 is comprised of 68 single-family residential parcels. This Assessment District was formed in Fiscal Year 1999-00 and the maximum assessment rate was set with an allowance for a 2% increase each fiscal year. Single-family parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 68.00 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $27,838 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $409.39/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $409.39/EDU

Page 201 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
.
-34-
Assessment District 99-7 (Termo) - Subdivisions 7882 & 8676.

Assessment District No. 99-7 is comprised of 277 single-family residential parcels.

This Assessment District was formed in Fiscal Year 1999-00 and the maximum assessment rate was set with an allowance for a 2% increase each fiscal year. Singlefamily parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 277.00 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $151,326 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $546.30/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $546.30/EDU
Assessment District 99-8 (Gerry Property) - Subdivisions 7844 & 8180. Conditional Use Permit 06-37 was annexed in Fiscal Year 2008-09.

Assessment District No. 99-8- is comprised of 137 single-family residential parcels and one parcel that has a Conditional Use Permit 06-37 which is within residentially zoned property and has a Contra Costa County use code designation of single family. This Assessment District was formed in Fiscal Year 1999-00 and the maximum assessment rate was set with an allowance for a 2% increase each fiscal year. Single-family parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 137.00 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $68,027 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $606.74/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $496.54/EDU

Page 202 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
.
-35-
Assessment District 99-9 (Richmond American) - Subdivisions 7474, 8170, 8368 & 8369.

Assessment District No. 99-9 is comprised of 245 single-family residential parcels.

This Assessment District was formed in Fiscal Year 1999-00 and the maximum assessment rate was set with an allowance for a 2% increase each fiscal year. Singlefamily parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 245.00 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $166,005 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $677.57/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $677.57/EDU
Assessment District 00-2 (Lyon Woodfield) - Subdivision 6665.

Assessment District No. 00-2 is comprised of 81 single-family residential parcels. This Assessment District was formed in Fiscal Year 2000-01 and the maximum assessment rate was with an allowance for a 2% increase each fiscal year. Single family parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 81.00 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $54,109 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $668.02/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $668.02/EDU

Page 203 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
.
-36-
Assessment District 00-3 (California Orchard) - Subdivisions 8199, 8200, 8342, DR00- 36, DR00-27, & DR04-12.

Assessment District No. 00-3 is comprised of 265 single family parcels and 7 commercial developments entailing 5.027 acres. This Assessment District was formed in Fiscal Year 2000-01 and the maximum assessment rate was set with an allowance for a 2% increase each fiscal year. Single-family parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel and commercial properties are assessed at 3.00 EDUs/acre.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 280.08 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $142,420 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $533.02/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $508.49/EDU
Assessment District 00-4 (Brentwood Park) - Subdivisions 8226 & 8402.

Assessment District No. 00-4 is comprised of 245 single-family residential parcels.

This Assessment District was formed in Fiscal Year 2000-01 and the maximum assessment rate was set with an allowance for a 2% increase each fiscal year. Singlefamily parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 245.00 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $162,160 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $1,093.08/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $661.88/EDU

Page 204 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
.
-37-
Assessment District 01-1 (Laird Project) - Subdivision 8416.

Assessment District No. 01-1 is comprised of 133 single-family residential parcels.

This Assessment District was formed in Fiscal Year 2001-02 and the maximum assessment rate was set with an allowance for a 2% increase each fiscal year. Single family parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 133.00 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $82,284 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $618.67/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $618.67/EDU
Assessment District 02-2 (Oakstreet) - Subdivision 8413, 8424, a multi-family parcel of 9 units & DR03-02 (Senior Apts.). Subdivision 8574 was annexed in Fiscal Year 2003-04 and Subdivisions 8534 & 8825 were annexed in Fiscal Year 2004-05.

Assessment District No. 02-2 is comprised of 599 single-family residential parcels, one parcel with 80 senior living apartments and one institutional parcel totaling 0.75 acres.

This Assessment District was formed in Fiscal Year 2002-03 and the maximum assessment rate was set with an allowance for a CPI increase each fiscal year. Singlefamily parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel, the senior living apartments/multifamily units are assessed at 0.50 EDUs/unit and institutional parcels are assessed at

3.00 EDUs/acre. These assessments will continue to have an allowance for a CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year June 30, 2002).

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 641.25 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $596,659 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $1,604.32/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $930.46/EDU

Page 205 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
.
-38-
Assessment District 02-3 (Apricot Way) - Subdivisions 8408, & 8469. Subdivisions 8470, 8912 & 8603 were annexed Fiscal Year 2003-04. Subdivisions 8556, 8557, 8601, 8281, 8831, 8849, and DR02-11 were annexed mid-year of Fiscal Year 2003-04.

Subdivisions 8663, 8763, & 8701 were annexed in Fiscal Year 2005-06. Minor Subdivision 365-05 was annexed in Fiscal Year 2006-07. Minor Subdivision 354-04 was annexed midyear of Fiscal Year 2006-07. Subdivision 8982 was annexed in Fiscal Year 2007-08. The residential portion of Subdivision 8506 was annexed Fiscal Year 2008-09.

Assessment District No. 02-3 is comprised of 1,077 single-family residential parcels, 13 vacant single-family residential parcels and three parcels totaling 179 apartment units. This Assessment District was formed in Fiscal Year 2002-03 and the maximum assessment rate was increased in Fiscal Year 2003-04 through a ballot process with an allowance for a CPI increase each fiscal year. Single-family parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel and vacant single- family parcels are assessed at 0.25 EDU/parcel.

Apartment complexes are assessed at 0.50 EDU/unit. These assessments will continue to have an allowance for a CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year June 30, 2003).

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 1,169.75 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $1,144,236 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $2,687.88/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $978.19/EDU
Assessment District 02-4 (Bradock & Logan) - Subdivision 8421.

Assessment District No. 02-4 is comprised of 56 single-family residential parcels. This Assessment District was formed in Fiscal Year 2002-03 and the maximum assessment rate was set with an allowance for a CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year June 30, 2002). Single-family parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 56.00 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $59,872 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $1,069.14/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $1,069.14/EDU

Page 206 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
.
-39-
Assessment District 02-5 (Sand Creek & Brentwood Boulevard) – 8671 (MS352-01), 8894, DR99-16, & CUP01-03. DR04-26 was annexed in Fiscal Year 2006-07, and DR05- 16 was annexed mid-year Fiscal Year 2006-07.

Assessment District No. 02-5 is comprised of 27.73 acres of institutional, industrial, commercial, and vacant commercial properties and 120 condominium parcels. This Assessment District was formed in Fiscal Year 2002-03 and the maximum assessment rate was set with an allowance for a CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year June 30, 2002). Condominium parcels are assessed at 0.75 EDUs/unit, commercial and industrial parcels are assessed 3.00 EDUs/acre and vacant commercial parcels are assessed at 0.75 EDUs/acre.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved or when the improvements to be maintained become the responsibility of the City. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 164.18 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $99,651 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $1,036.82/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $606.96/EDU

Page 207 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
.
-40-
Assessment District 02-6 (Balfour & John Muir) – CUP00-9 (8550), DR03-01 (8754), MS358-04, DR03-24 and the Fire Station. CUP 02-04 and DR04-21 were annexed in Fiscal Year 2005-06.

Assessment District No. 02-6 is comprised of commercial, vacant commercial, and institutional parcels totaling 76.771 acres. This Assessment District was formed in Fiscal Year 2002-03 and the maximum assessment rate was set with an allowance for a CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year June 30, 2002).

Commercial/institutional parcels are assessed at 3.00 EDUs/acre and vacant commercial parcels are assessed at 0.75 EDUs/acre.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved or when the improvements to be maintained become the responsibility of the City. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 142.55 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $41,632 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $292.06/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $292.06/EDU

Page 208 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
.
-41-
Assessment District 02-7 (San Jose and Sand Creek) – DR01-05 (MS357-01), & DR03- 04(MS353-01). DR06-08 was annexed in Fiscal Year 2007-08.

Assessment District No. 02-7 is comprised of commercial, vacant commercial and institutional parcels totaling 77.36 acres. This Assessment District was formed in Fiscal Year 2002-03 and the maximum assessment rate was set with an allowance for a CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year June 30, 2002). Commercial/institutional parcels are assessed at 3.00 EDUs/acre and vacant commercial parcels are assessed at 0.75 EDUs/acre.

The maximum assessment rate includes maintenance of certain areas that are currently proposed to be maintained by the property owners. However, the parcels will be assessed for citywide improvements and the capital replacement costs associated with the public improvements. If the property owners fail to maintain their landscaping improvements to City of Brentwood standards, then the maximum assessment rate has been set high enough for the City to step in and maintain the improvements and assess the property owner for these costs.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved or when the improvements to be maintained become the responsibility of the City. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 220.58 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $103,285 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $1,096.26/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $568.80/EDU
Some properties within Assessment District 02-7 are not located within the Grant Street Trail Benefit Boundary and as a result do not benefit from the Grant Street Trail improvements and will be assessed $366.77/EDU.

Page 209 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
.
-42-
Assessment District 02-8 (Lone Tree) – MS 356-04 (Arco). CUP03-04 (Tire Center), MS364-02 (CUP02-18 Family Fitness, DR02-35 Shell, Restaurant) and CUP99-06 (Golden Hills Church) were annexed mid-year Fiscal Year 2003-04. DR05-13 and DR05- 03 were annexed in Fiscal Year 2006-07.

Assessment District No. 02-8 is comprised of commercial and vacant commercial parcels totaling 39.08 acres located at the southeast corner of Lone Tree and Empire Avenue. This Assessment District was formed in Fiscal Year 2002-03 and the maximum assessment rate was decreased in Fiscal Year 2003-04 with an allowance for a CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year June 2003). Commercial parcels are assessed at 3.00 EDUs/acre. Vacant commercial properties are assessed at 0.75 EDUs/acre.

The maximum assessment rate includes maintenance of certain areas that are currently proposed to be maintained by the property owners. However, the parcels will be assessed for citywide improvements and the capital replacement costs associated with the public improvements. If the property owners fail to maintain their landscaping improvements to City of Brentwood standards, then the maximum assessment rate has been set high enough for the City to step in and maintain the improvements and assess the property owner for these costs.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved or when the improvements to be maintained become the responsibility of the City. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 117.24 EDUs that are assessable, however the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $53,707 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $565.39/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $458.09/EDU

Page 210 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
.
-43-
Assessment District 02-9 (Balfour Plaza) - CUP 01-23 or MS 356-00. DR06-20 was annexed in Fiscal Year 2007-08.

Assessment District No. 02-9 is comprised of commercial and vacant commercial parcels totaling 8.241 acres, located on the southeast corner of Balfour Road and Walnut Boulevard. This Assessment District was formed mid-year Fiscal Year 2002-03 and the maximum assessment rate was set with an allowance for a minimum of a 2% CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year December 2002). Commercial parcels are assessed at 3.00 EDUs/acre and vacant commercial properties are assessed at 0.75 EDUs/acre.

The maximum assessment rate includes maintenance of certain areas that are currently proposed to be maintained by the property owners. However, the parcels will be assessed for citywide improvements and the capital replacement costs associated with the public improvements. If the property owners fail to maintain their landscaping improvements to City of Brentwood standards, then the maximum assessment rate has been set high enough for the City to step in and maintain the improvements and assess the property owner for these costs.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved or when the improvements to be maintained become the responsibility of the City. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 16.60 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $7,236 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $990.73/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $435.85/EDU

Page 211 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
.
-44-
Assessment District 02-10 (Lone Tree Center) – Subdivision 8617 or DR 01-32. DR05- 29 was annexed in Fiscal Year 2007-08. The 1.87-acre commercial parcel at the northwest corner of Lone Tree Way and Fairview Avenue and the proposed site of a future McDonald’s was annexed in Fiscal Year 2012-13.

Assessment District No. 02-10 is comprised of commercial and vacant commercial parcels totaling 29.747 acres, located on the north side of Lone Tree Way, west of Empire Avenue. This Assessment District was formed mid-year Fiscal Year 2002-03 and the maximum assessment rate was set with an allowance for a minimum of a 2% CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year December 2002). Commercial parcels are assessed at 3.00 EDUs/acre and vacant commercial properties are assessed at 0.75 EDUs/acre.

The maximum assessment rate includes maintenance of certain areas that are currently proposed to be maintained by the property owners. However, the parcels will be assessed for citywide improvements and the capital replacement costs associated with the public improvements. If the property owners fail to maintain their landscaping improvements to City of Brentwood standards, then the maximum assessment rate has been set high enough for the City to step in and maintain the improvements and assess the property owner for these costs.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved or when the improvements to be maintained become the responsibility of the City. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 73.19 EDUs that are assessable, however the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $18,723 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $255.81/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $255.81/EDU

Page 212 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
.
-45-
Assessment District 02-11 (Lone Tree Plaza - Arcadia) - Subdivision 8515 (8768) or DR 01-30. The commercial portion of Subdivision 8506 was annexed Fiscal Year 2008-

09. Assessment District No. 02-11 is comprised of commercial and vacant commercial parcels totaling 82.275 acres, located south of Lone Tree Way and north of Sand Creek Road, between Heidorn Ranch Road and Jeffrey Way. This Assessment District was formed mid-year Fiscal Year 2002-03. The maximum assessment rate was set with an allowance for a minimum of a 2% CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year December 2002. Commercial parcels are assessed at 3.00 EDUs/acre and vacant commercial properties are assessed at 0.75 EDUs/acre.

The maximum assessment rate includes maintenance of certain areas that are currently proposed to be maintained by the property owners. However, the parcels will be assessed for citywide improvements and the capital replacement costs associated with the public improvements. If the property owners fail to maintain their landscaping improvements to City of Brentwood standards, then the maximum assessment rate has been set high enough for the City to step in and maintain the improvements and assess the property owner for these costs.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved or when the improvements to be maintained become the responsibility of the City. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 194.94 EDUs that are assessable, however the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $61,505 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $744.91/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $315.50/EDU

Page 213 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
.
-46-
Assessment District 02-12 (Sunset Industrial) - Subdivision 8588 or 8842.

Assessment District No. 02-12 is comprised of 18 industrial, vacant industrial, and institutional parcels totaling 40.25 acres located north of Sunset Road, between Brentwood Boulevard and Sellers Avenue. This Assessment District was formed midyear Fiscal Year 2002-03. Industrial/ institutional parcels are assessed at 3.00 EDUs/acre and vacant industrial parcels are assessed at 0.75 EDU/acre. The maximum assessment rate was set with an allowance for a minimum of a 2% CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year December 2002). This maximum assessment rate includes maintenance of all areas.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved or when the improvements to be maintained become the responsibility of the City. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 112.425 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $74,804 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $973.41/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $665.36/EDU
Assessment District 02-13 (Stonehaven) - CUP 01-08 & Subdivision 8661.

Assessment District No. 02-13 is comprised of an 8.738-acre institutional parcel and 45 single-family parcels located at the northeast corner of Fairview and Central. This Assessment District was formed mid-year Fiscal Year 2002-03. Single-family parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel and institutional parcels are assessed at 3.00 EDUs/acre. The maximum assessment rate was set with an allowance for a minimum of a 2% CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year December 2002).

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved or when the improvements to be maintained become the responsibility of the City. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 71.21 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $25,758 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $1,281.43/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $361.70/EDU

Page 214 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
.
-47-
Assessment District 03-2 (Meritage Lone Tree) - Subdivision 8546. Subdivisions 8561 & 8675 were annexed Mid-Year Fiscal Year 2003-04. Subdivisions 8724, 8788, 8789, 8832, & 8833 were annexed Fiscal Year 2005-06. Subdivisions 8674, 8875, 8954 and Minor Subdivisions 359-03 & 350-05 were annexed Fiscal Year 2006-07.

Assessment District No. 03-2 is comprised of 1,521 single-family parcels, two vacant single-family parcels and one 7.229-acre institutional parcel located at the southwest corner of O’Hara and Lone Tree Road. This Assessment District was formed Fiscal Year 2003-04. The maximum assessment rate was set with an allowance for a minimum of a 2% CPI increase each fiscal year which was based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year June 2003).

Single-family parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel, vacant single-family parcels are assessed at 0.25 EDUs/parcel, and institutional parcels are assessed at 3.00 EDUs/acre.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved or when the improvements to be maintained become the responsibility of the City. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 1,543.19 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $1,503,355 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $2,636.15/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $1,076.70/EDU
Some properties within Assessment District 03-2 are not located within the Grant Street Trail Benefit Boundary and as a result do not benefit from the Grant Street Trail improvements and will be assessed $874.67/EDU.

Page 215 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
.
-48-
Assessment District 03-3 (Brookdale Court) - Subdivision 8722. Subdivision 8854 and minor subdivision 351-00 were annexed Fiscal Year 2006-07.

Assessment District No. 03-3 is comprised of 125 single-family parcels, three vacant single-family parcels and one parcel with 4 condominium units located at the eastern corner of Balfour and Fairview. This Assessment District was formed in Fiscal Year 2003-04 and the maximum assessment rate was set with an allowance for a minimum of a 2% CPI increase each fiscal year based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year June 2003). Single-family parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel and vacant single-family properties are assessed at

0.25 EDUs/parcel. Condominiums are assessed 0.75 EDUs/unit.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved or when the improvements to be maintained become the responsibility of the City. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 128.75 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $85,596 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $2,571.16/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $664.82/EDU

Page 216 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
.
-49-
Assessment District 03-4 (Tri City Plaza) – CUP 01-24 and DR00-14 were annexed mid-year Fiscal Year 2003-04.

Assessment District No. 03-4 is comprised of 6 commercial, vacant commercial, and industrial parcels totaling 12.542 acres located on the north & south sides of Lone Tree Road, east of Fairview Avenue. This Assessment District was formed in Fiscal Year 2003-04 and the maximum assessment rate was decreased midyear Fiscal Year 2003- 04 with an allowance for a minimum of a 2% CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year June 2003). Commercial/industrial parcels are at assessed 3.00 EDUs/acre and vacant commercial parcels are assessed at 0.75 EDUs/acre.

The maximum assessment rate includes maintenance of certain areas that are currently proposed to be maintained by the property owners. However, the parcels will be assessed for citywide improvements and the capital replacement costs associated with the public improvements. If the property owners fail to maintain their landscaping improvements to City of Brentwood standards, then the maximum assessment rate has been set high enough for the City to step in and maintain the improvements and assess the property owner for these costs.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved or when the improvements to be maintained become the responsibility of the City. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 33.78 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $12,519 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $370.61/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $370.61/EDU

Page 217 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
.
-50-
Assessment District 03-5 (West Summerset) – Subdivision 8953 and DR03-26.

Assessment District No. 03-5 is comprised of 90 single-family residential parcels and a 120-unit assisted living parcel that is 4.72 acres. It is located at the northwest corner of the Highway 4 Bypass and Cortona Way. This Assessment District was formed Fiscal Year 2003-04 and was reorganized in Fiscal Year 2005-06 (the maximum assessment rate was lowered). The maximum assessment rate was set with an allowance for a minimum of a 2% CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year June 2005). Single-family parcels are assessed 1.00 EDU/unit and the 120-senior assisted living institutional property is assessed at 3.00 EDUs/acre.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved or when the improvements to be maintained become the responsibility of the City. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 104.16 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $64,574 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $1,246.90/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $619.95/EDU
Assessment District 03-6 (Arbor Village) – Subdivision 8735.

Assessment District No. 03-6 is comprised of 66 single-family parcels located at the southeast corner of Brentwood Boulevard and Sycamore Avenue. This Assessment District was formed mid-year Fiscal Year 2003-04 and the maximum assessment was set with an allowance for a minimum of a 2% CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year June 2003). Single-family parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved or when the improvements to be maintained become the responsibility of the City. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 it is anticipated all local improvements will be maintained through a Homeowners Association. However, the single-family parcels will be assessed for citywide improvements and the capital replacement costs associated with the public improvements. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 66.00 EDUs assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed within the Assessment District is $18,573 (as shown in Appendix A). In addition, if the Homeowners Association fails to properly operate and maintain the improvements within Assessment District No. 03-6 the City Council has the discretion to levy assessments up to the authorized maximum assessment rate.

This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $412.78/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $281.40/EDU

Page 218 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
.
-51-
Assessment District 03-7 (Garin Ranch Commercial) – DR02-06 or 8633.

Assessment District No. 03-7 is comprised of 8 commercial/vacant commercial parcels totaling 8.525 acres, located on the northeast corner of Brentwood Boulevard and Balfour Road. This Assessment District was formed mid-year Fiscal Year 2003-04 and the maximum assessment rate was set with an allowance for a minimum of a 2% CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year June 2003). Commercial parcels are assessed at 3.00 EDUs/acre and vacant commercial properties are assessed at 0.75 EDUs/acre.

The maximum assessment rate includes maintenance of certain areas that are currently proposed to be maintained by the property owners. However, the parcels will be assessed for citywide improvements and the capital replacement costs associated with the public improvements. If the property owners fail to maintain their landscaping improvements to City of Brentwood standards, then the maximum assessment rate has been set high enough for the City to step in and maintain the improvements and assess the property owner for these costs.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved or when the improvements to be maintained become the responsibility of the City. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 it is anticipated that parcels within LLAD 03-7 will be assessed for citywide landscape improvements and the capital replacement costs associated with the public improvements. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 21.32 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed within the Assessment District is $6,372 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $434.80/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $298.93/EDU

Page 219 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
.
-52-
Assessment District 03-8 (Blackhawk Commercial) – Blackhawk Commercial Assessment District No. 03-8 will eventually be comprised of 86 developed and vacant single-family parcel and one institutional parcel totaling 6.690 acres, located on the southeast corner of Highway 4 Bypass and Balfour Road. This Assessment District was formed mid-year Fiscal Year 2003-04 and the maximum assessment rate was set with an allowance for a minimum of a 2% CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year June 2003). Vacant commercial parcels are assessed at 0.75 EDUs/acre and vacant single-family properties are assessed at 0.25 EDUs/parcel.

The maximum assessment rate includes maintenance of certain areas that are currently proposed to be maintained by the property owners. However, the parcels will be assessed for citywide improvements and the capital replacement costs associated with the public improvements. If the property owners fail to maintain their landscaping improvements to City of Brentwood standards, then the maximum assessment rate has been set high enough for the City to step in and maintain the improvements and assess the property owner for these costs.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved or when the improvements to be maintained become the responsibility of the City. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 92.57 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $33,969 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $1,030.78/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $366.95/EDU

Page 220 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
.
-53-
Assessment District 04-2 (Balfour-Griffith Commercial) – CUP03-02 (In Shape City).

DR05-27 was annexed Mid-Year of Fiscal Year 2006-07.

Assessment District No. 04-2 is comprised of 5 commercial and vacant commercial parcels totaling 6.914 acres, located on the southwest corner of Balfour Road and Griffith Lane. This Assessment District was formed in Fiscal Year 2004-05 and the maximum assessment rate was set with an allowance for a minimum of a 2% CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year June 2004). Commercial parcels are assessed at 3.00 EDUs/acre and vacant commercial parcels are assessed at 0.75 EDUs/acre.

The maximum assessment rate includes maintenance of certain areas that are currently proposed to be maintained by the property owners. However, the parcels will be assessed for citywide improvements and the capital replacement costs associated with the public improvements. If the property owners fail to maintain their landscaping improvements to City of Brentwood standards, then the maximum assessment rate has been set high enough for the City to step in and maintain the improvements and assess the property owner for these costs.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved or when the improvements to be maintained become the responsibility of the City. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 20.74 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $7,388 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $356.16/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $356.16/EDU

Page 221 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
.
-54-
Assessment District 05-2 (South Brentwood Boulevard Commercial) – DR03-09 (Best Western). DR04-07 (Harvest Commerce) was annexed Fiscal Year 2006-07. Minor Subdivision 353-05 (Valdry Ct. Business Park) was annexed in Fiscal Year 2009-10.

DR15-016 (Elite Storage) and DR16-001 (Tractor Supply) were annexed in Fiscal Year 2016-17.

Assessment District No. 05-2 is comprised of commercial and industrial parcels totaling

16.553 acres, located on Valdry Court. This Assessment District was formed Fiscal Year 2005-06 and the maximum assessment rate was set with an allowance for a minimum of a 2% CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year June 2005).

Commercial/industrial parcels are assessed at 3.00 EDUs/acre.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved or when the improvements to be maintained become the responsibility of the City. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 49.66 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $7,918 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $159.45/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $159.45/EDU
Assessment District 06-2 (Palmilla) – Subdivision 8729. Subdivision 8311 was annexed in Fiscal Year 2007-08. Subdivision 8446 was annexed Mid-Year Fiscal Year 2009-10.

Subdivision 9332 was re-subdivided in December 2013.

Assessment District No. 06-2 is comprised of 514 single-family parcels located at Walnut and Central and 8 vacant single-family parcels on St. James Court. This Assessment District was formed in Fiscal Year 2006-07 and the maximum assessment rate was set with an allowance for a minimum of a 2% CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year June 2006). Single-family units are assessed 1.00 EDU/unit.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved or when the improvements to be maintained become the responsibility of the City. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 516.00 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $464,003 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $2,083.98/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $899.23/EDU

Page 222 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
.
-55-
Assessment District 06-3 (Vineyards) – Subdivisions 8796, 8906 through 8910, 9186 and 9451.

Assessment District No. 06-3 is comprised of 1,266 single-family parcels, 3 vacant single-family parcels and 32.072 acres of commercial, vacant commercial, and vacant institutional parcels located in the south portion of Fairview Avenue and the City at State Highway 4 Bypass. This Assessment District was formed mid-year of Fiscal Year 2006-07 and the maximum assessment rate was set with an allowance for a minimum of a 2% CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year June 2006). Single-family parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel. Non-Residential parcels are assessed at

3.00 EDUs/acre. Vacant non-residential parcels are assessed at 0.75 EDUs/acre.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved or when the improvements to be maintained become the responsibility of the City. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 1,330.18 EDUs that are assessable, and the total revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $612,163 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $3,094.89/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $460.21/EDU

Page 223 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
.
-56-
Assessment District 06-4 (Villa Amador) – Design Review 01-43 (Villa Amador Apartments).

Assessment District No. 06-4 is comprised of 96 multi-family units located at the northeast corner of Sand Creek Road and Shady Willow. This Assessment District was formed mid-year of Fiscal Year 2006-07 and the maximum assessment rate was set with an allowance for a minimum of a 2% CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year June 2006). Multi-family parcels are assessed at 0.50 EDU/unit.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved or when the improvements to be maintained become the responsibility of the City. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 48.00 EDUs that are assessable, and the total revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $34,004 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $1,750.66/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $708.41/EDU
Assessment District 06-5 (Barrington) – Subdivision 8548.

Assessment District No. 06-5 is comprised of 494 single-family parcels, and 6.26 acres of institutional and vacant institutional parcels located in the east portion of the City at Garin Parkway and Sand Creek Road. This Assessment District was formed mid-year of Fiscal Year 2006-07 and the maximum rate was set with an allowance for a minimum of a 2% CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year June 2006). Single-family parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel. Institutional parcels are assessed at 3.00 EDUs/acre and vacant institutional parcels are assessed at 0.75 EDUs/acre.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved or when the improvements to be maintained become the responsibility of the City. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 509.95 EDUs that are assessable, and the total revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $577,594 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $2,614.11/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $1,132.66/EDU

Page 224 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
.
-57-
Assessment District 11-1 (North Brentwood Boulevard) – Subdivision 9155. Design Review 10-003 (The Grove at Sunset Court) was annexed in Fiscal Year 2012-13.

Assessment District No. 11-1 is comprised of 33 single-family parcels, 10 duet units, and a 54-unit apartment complex located on the west side of Brentwood Boulevard just south of Marsh Creek. This Assessment District was formed mid-year of Fiscal Year 2011-12 and the maximum rate was set with an allowance for a minimum of a 2% CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year June 2011). Single-family parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel, duets at 0.75EDU/parcel, and multi-family parcels are assessed at 0.50 EDUs/unit.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved or when the improvements to be maintained become the responsibility of the City. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 57.50 EDUs that are assessable, and the total revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $36,033 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $1,084.05/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $626.67/EDU
Assessment District 14-1 (Mission Grove) – Subdivision 9154 and 9371.

Assessment District No. 14-1 is comprised of 129 single-family parcels located on the west side of Armstrong Road. This Assessment District was formed in Fiscal Year 2013-14 and the maximum rate was set with an allowance for a minimum of a 2% CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year June 2013). Single-family parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved or when the improvements to be maintained become the responsibility of the City. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 129.00 EDUs that are assessable, and the total revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements that benefit the Assessment District is $78,712 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $952.78/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $610.17/EDU

Page 225 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
.
-58-
Assessment District 14-2 (Ferro-Ronconi) – Subdivision 9173.

Assessment District No. 14-2 is comprised of 160 single-family and two vacant singlefamily parcels located on the west side of Griffith Lane just north of Balfour Road. This Assessment District was formed in Fiscal Year 2013-14 and the maximum rate was set with an allowance for a minimum of a 2% CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year June 2013). Single-family parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel and vacant single-family parcels are assessed at 0.25 EDU/parcel.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved or when the improvements to be maintained become the responsibility of the City. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 160.00 EDUs that are assessable, and the total revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements that benefit the Assessment District is $137,150 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $1,415.58/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $857.19/EDU
Assessment District 15-1 (Bella Fiore) – Subdivision 9378.

Assessment District No. 15-1 is comprised of 98 single-family parcels located between Shady Willow Lane and Empire Avenue just north of Amber Lane. This Assessment District was formed mid-year of Fiscal Year 2014-15 and the maximum rate was set with an allowance for a minimum of a 2% CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year June 2015). Single-family parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved or when the improvements to be maintained become the responsibility of the City. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 98.00 EDUs that are assessable, and the total revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements that benefit the Assessment District is $87,777 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $920.63/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $895.68/EDU

Page 226 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
.
-59-
Assessment District 15-2 (Renaissance Estates) – Subdivision 9372.

Assessment District No. 15-2 is comprised of 9 single-family parcels located south of Amber Lane just off Windy Springs Lane. This Assessment District was formed midyear of Fiscal Year 2014-15 and the maximum rate was set with an allowance for a minimum of a 2% CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year June 2015). Singlefamily parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved or when the improvements to be maintained become the responsibility of the City. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 9.00 EDUs that are assessable, and the total revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements that benefit the Assessment District is $15,293 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $1,699.19/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $1,699.19/EDU
Assessment District 16-1 (Bond Lane) – Subdivisions 9386 and 9387.

Assessment District No. 16-1 is comprised of 63 single-family parcels located between O’Hara Lane and Adams Lane north of Grant Street. This Assessment District was formed in Fiscal Year 2016-17 and the maximum rate was set with an allowance for a minimum of a 2% CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year June 2015). Singlefamily parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved or when the improvements to be maintained become the responsibility of the City. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 63.00 EDUs that are assessable, and the total revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements that benefit the Assessment District is $91,122 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $2,173.80/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $1,446.37/EDU

Page 227 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
.
-60-
Assessment District 16-2 (Sellers) – Subdivisions 9411 and 9421.

Assessment District No. 16-2 is comprised of 180 single-family parcels located west of Sellers Avenue and south of Balfour Road. This Assessment District was formed midyear of Fiscal Year 2016-17 and the maximum rate was set with an allowance for a minimum of a 2% CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year June 2016). Singlefamily parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel and vacant single-family parcels are assessed at 0.25 EDUs/parcel.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved or when the improvements to be maintained become the responsibility of the City. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 180.00 EDUs that are assessable, and the total revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements that benefit the Assessment District is $111,444 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $619.13/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $619.13/EDU
Assessment District 17-1 (Sparrow) – Subdivision 9393.

Assessment District No. 17-1 is comprised of 50 single-family parcels located west of Brentwood Boulevard and north of Sand Creek Road. This Assessment District was formed mid-year of Fiscal Year 2016-17 and the maximum rate was set with an allowance for a minimum of a 2% CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year June 2016). Single-family parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved or when the improvements to be maintained become the responsibility of the City. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 50.00 EDUs that are assessable, and the total revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements that benefit the Assessment District is $32,008 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $966.20/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $640.15/EDU

Page 228 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
.
-61-
Assessment District 17-2 (Catching’s Ranch) – Subdivision 9424.

Assessment District No. 17-2 is comprised of 24 single-family parcels located west of Minnesota Road and north of Balfour Road. This Assessment District was formed midyear of Fiscal Year 2016-17 and the maximum rate was set with an allowance for a minimum of a 2% CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year June 2016). Singlefamily parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel and vacant single-family parcels are assessed at 0.25 EDU/parcel.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved or when the improvements to be maintained become the responsibility of the City. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 24.00 EDUs that are assessable, and the total revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements that benefit the Assessment District is $27,191 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $1,413.59/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $1,132.94/EDU
Assessment District 17-3 (Cornerstone Fellowship) – DR15-004.

Assessment District No. 17-3 is comprised of one 5.312-acre institutional parcel located south of Lone Tree Way and west of Windy Springs Lane. This Assessment District was formed mid-year Fiscal Year 2017-18 and the maximum rate was set with an allowance for a minimum of a 2% CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year June 2017). Institutional parcels are assessed at 3.00 EDUs/acre.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved or when the improvements to be maintained become the responsibility of the City. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 15.94 EDUs that are assessable, and the total revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements that benefit the Assessment District is $7,166 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $530.04/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $449.64/EDU

Page 229 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
.
-62-
Assessment District 19-1 (Terrene) – Subdivisions 9471 and 9496.

Assessment District No. 19-1 is comprised of 326 single-family parcels located east of Brentwood Boulevard and north and south of Sand Creek Road. This Assessment District was formed mid-year Fiscal Year 2018-19 and the maximum rate was set with an allowance for a minimum of a 2% CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year June 2018). Single-family parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel and vacant singlefamily parcels are assessed at 0.25 EDUs/parcel.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved or when the improvements to be maintained become the responsibility of the City. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 326.00 EDUs that are assessable, and the total revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements that benefit the Assessment District is $204,281 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $1,050.69/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $689.22/EDU
Some properties within Assessment District 19-1 are not located within the Grant Street Trail Benefit Boundary and as a result do not benefit from the Grant Street Trail improvements and will be assessed $487.19 EDU.

Page 230 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
.
-63-
Assessment District 19-2 (Alvernaz) – Subdivision 9424. Subdivision 9496 was annexed in Fiscal Year 2019-20.

Assessment District No. 19-2 is comprised of 208 single family parcels located east of Empire Avenue and north of Lone Tree Way. This Assessment District was formed mid-year Fiscal Year 2018-19 and the maximum rate was set with an allowance for a minimum of a 2% CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year June 2018). Singlefamily parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved or when the improvements to be maintained become the responsibility of the City. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 208.00 EDUs that are assessable, and the total revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements that benefit the Assessment District is $107,635 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $713.37/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $517.48/EDU
Assessment District 21-2 (Orchard Trails) – Subdivision 9523.

Assessment District No. 21-2 is anticipated to be comprised of 77 single-family and 2 attached single-family parcels located south of Continente Avenue and west of Walnut Boulevard. This Assessment District was formed the beginning of Fiscal Year 2021-22 and the maximum rate was set with an allowance for a minimum of a 2% CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year of 2020). Single-family parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel and attached single-family parcels are assessed at 0.75 EDUs/parcel.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved or when the improvements to be maintained become the responsibility of the City. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 78.50 EDUs that are assessable, and the total revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements that benefit the Assessment District is $96,668 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $1,231.48/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $1,231.44/EDU

Page 231 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
.
-64-
Assessment District 21-3 (Bennett Estates) – Subdivision 9519.

Assessment District No. 21-3 is anticipated to be comprised of 14 single family parcels located west of O’Hara Avenue and north of Grant Street Trail. This Assessment District was formed the beginning of Fiscal Year 2021-22 and the maximum rate was set with an allowance for a minimum of a 2% CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year of 2020). Single-family parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved or when the improvements to be maintained become the responsibility of the City. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 14.00 EDUs that are assessable, and the total revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements that benefit the Assessment District is $19,374 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $1,342.55/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $1,342.55/EDU
Assessment District 23-1 (Orchard Grove) – Subdivision 9535.

Assessment District No. 23-1 is anticipated to be comprised of 45 single family parcels and 6 duet parcels located east of Adams Lane and north of Gracie Lane. This Assessment District was formed the beginning of Fiscal Year 2023-24, and the maximum rate was set with an allowance for a minimum of a 2% CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year of 2022). Single-family parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel and duets are assessed at 0.75 EDU/parcel.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved or when the improvements to be maintained become the responsibility of the City. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 12.38 EDUs that are assessable, and the total revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements that benefit the Assessment District is $64,940 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $1,698.71/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $1,311.92/EDU

Page 232 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
.
-65-
Assessment District 24-1 (Hanson Lane) – Subdivision 9547.

Assessment District No. 24-1 is anticipated to be comprised of 94 single family parcels located south of Lone Tree Way and east of Brentwood Boulevard. This Assessment District was formed the beginning of Fiscal Year 2024-25, and the maximum rate was set with an allowance for a minimum of a 2% CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year of 2023). Single-family parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved or when the improvements to be maintained become the responsibility of the City. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 94.00 EDUs that are assessable, and the total revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements that benefit the Assessment District is $71,434 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $759.93 /EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $759.93/EDU
Assessment District 24-2 (Trumark Trailside) – Subdivision 9610.

Assessment District No. 24-2 is anticipated to be comprised of 57 single family parcels and 6 duet parcels located north of Sand Creek Road and west of Fairview Avenue.

This Assessment District was formed the beginning of Fiscal Year 2024-25, and the maximum rate was set with an allowance for a minimum of a 2% CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year of 2023). Single-family parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel and duets are assessed at 0.75 EDU/parcel.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved or when the improvements to be maintained become the responsibility of the City. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 61.50 EDUs that are assessable, and the total revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements that benefit the Assessment District is $89,121 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $1,449.12/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $1,449.12/EDU

Page 233 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
.
-66-
Assessment District 24-3 (Inez Estates) – Subdivision 9435.

Assessment District No. 24-3 is anticipated to be comprised of 8 single family parcels located south of Lone Tree Way and west of Gann Street. This Assessment District was formed the beginning of Fiscal Year 2024-25, and the maximum rate was set with an allowance for a minimum of a 2% CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year of 2023). Single-family parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved or when the improvements to be maintained become the responsibility of the City. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 8.00 EDUs that are assessable, and the total revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements that benefit the Assessment District is $7,048 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $881.01/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $881.00/EDU

Page 234 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART E
.
-67-
PART E

PROPERTY OWNER LIST & ASSESSMENT ROLL
A list of names and addresses of the owners of all parcels, and the description of each lot or parcel within each of the City of Brentwood’s Landscape & Lighting Districts is shown on the last equalized Property Tax Roll of the Contra Costa County Assessor, which by reference is hereby made a part of this Report.

This list is keyed to the Assessor's Parcel Numbers as shown on the Assessment Roll, which includes the proposed amount of assessments apportioned to each lot or parcel.

The Assessment Roll is on file in the Office of the City Clerk of the City of Brentwood and is shown in this Report as Appendix “B”.

Page 235 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2025-26 APPENDIX A

APPENDIX A

DETAILED PROJECT COST BREAKDOWN

Page 236 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 94-1
Brentwood Country Club
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2025 $23,669 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) ($6,078)
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) ($27,659)
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) ($298)
Landscaping ($44,244)
($78,279)
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($1,772)
Administration ($11,979)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($2,267)
($16,018)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail $0
Arterial Landscaping ($513,985)
Arterial Lighting ($60,085)
Parks ($451,114)
($1,025,184)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($47,149)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) ($4,590) ($51,739)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $1,978
Fund Balance Credit $490,125
Additional City Contribution $0
$490,125
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $655,448
Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. 3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 1

Page 237 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 95-2
Hawthorne Landing
Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2025 $44,840 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) ($5,896)
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) ($75,710)
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) ($231)
Landscaping ($25,136)
($106,973)
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($2,360)
Administration ($15,953)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($291)
($18,604)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail $0
Arterial Landscaping ($63,964)
Arterial Lighting ($7,477)
Parks ($57,575)
($129,016)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($62,789)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) ($4,515) ($67,304)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $2,602
Fund Balance Credit $0
Additional City Contribution $152,061
$152,061
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $122,394
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. 3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 2

Page 238 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 95-3
Pheasant Run
Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2025 $356 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) $0
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) ($585)
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) $0
Landscaping $0
($585)
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($13)
Administration ($90)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($23)
($126)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail $0
Arterial Landscaping ($5,149)
Arterial Lighting ($602)
Parks ($4,635)
($10,386)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($356)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) $0
($356)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $14
Fund Balance Credit $589
Additional City Contribution $1,740
$2,329
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $8,755
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. 3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 3

Page 239 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 95-4
Diablo Estates
Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2025 $14 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) $0
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) $0
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) $0
Landscaping $0
$0
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($1)
Administration ($3)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($23)
($27)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail $0
Arterial Landscaping ($5,149)
Arterial Lighting ($602)
Parks ($4,635)
($10,386)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($14)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) $0
($14)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $1
Fund Balance Credit $137
Additional City Contribution $2,087
$2,224
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $8,189
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. 3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 4

Page 240 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 95-5
California Spirit & Glory
Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2025 $54,350 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) ($10,381)
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) ($62,633)
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) ($208)
Landscaping ($36,051)
($109,273)
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($2,414)
Administration ($16,317)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($437)
($19,168)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail $0
Arterial Landscaping ($96,243)
Arterial Lighting ($11,251)
Parks ($86,630)
($194,124)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($64,221)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) ($3,756) ($67,977)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $2,644
Fund Balance Credit $0
Additional City Contribution $165,150
$165,150
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $168,398
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. 3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 5

Page 241 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 95-6
Gerry Ranch
Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2025 $6,399 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) ($2,339)
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) ($11,924)
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) ($53)
Landscaping ($8,946)
($23,262)
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($514)
Administration ($3,471)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($79)
($4,064)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail $0
Arterial Landscaping ($17,427)
Arterial Lighting ($2,037)
Parks ($15,686)
($35,150)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($13,663)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) ($410)
($14,073)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $555
Fund Balance Credit $1,249
Additional City Contribution $27,340
$28,589
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $41,006
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. 3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 6

Page 242 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 95-7
Greystone
Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2025 $18,368 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) ($3,505)
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) ($36,433)
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) ($150)
Landscaping ($13,599)
($53,687)
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($1,189)
Administration ($8,035)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($337)
($9,561)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail $0
Arterial Landscaping ($75,759)
Arterial Lighting ($8,856)
Parks ($66,793)
($151,408)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($31,624)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) ($2,990) ($34,614)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $1,325
Fund Balance Credit $0
Additional City Contribution $111,386
$111,386
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $118,191
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. 3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 7

Page 243 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 95-8
Garin Ranch
Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2025 $56,943 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) ($11,964)
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) ($95,344)
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) ($1,431)
Landscaping ($34,456)
($143,195)
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($3,168)
Administration ($21,411)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($769)
($25,348)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail $0
Arterial Landscaping ($169,118)
Arterial Lighting ($19,770)
Parks ($152,226)
($341,114)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($84,272)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) ($36,532) ($120,804)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $4,102
Fund Balance Credit $0
Additional City Contribution $272,049
$272,049
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $297,367
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. 3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 8

Page 244 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 97-1
Brentwood Lakes
Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2025 $53,035 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) ($6,143)
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) ($41,790)
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) ($148)
Landscaping ($41,686)
($89,767)
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($1,994)
Administration ($13,475)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($833)
($16,302)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail $0
Arterial Landscaping ($186,455)
Arterial Lighting ($21,797)
Parks ($165,156)
($373,408)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($53,035)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) ($5,626) ($58,661)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $2,234
Fund Balance Credit $8,770
Additional City Contribution $0
$8,770
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $474,100
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. 3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 9

Page 245 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 97-2
Marsh Creek Apartments
Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2025 $1 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) $0
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) $0
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) $0
Landscaping $0
$0
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees $0
Administration $0
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($1)
($1)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail ($12,728)
Arterial Landscaping ($12,476)
Arterial Lighting ($1,458)
Parks ($17,967)
($44,629)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($1)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) $0
($1)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $0
Fund Balance Credit $278
Additional City Contribution $17,534
$17,812
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $26,819
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. 3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 10

Page 246 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 97-3
Brentwood Park Apartments
Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2025 $131 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) $0
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) ($351)
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) $0
Landscaping $0
($351)
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($8)
Administration ($53)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($2)
($63)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail $0
Arterial Landscaping ($15,842)
Arterial Lighting ($1,852)
Parks ($22,816)
($40,510)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($207)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) $0
($207)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $8
Fund Balance Credit $14
Additional City Contribution $35,946
$35,960
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $5,032
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. 3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 11

Page 247 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 98-3
Solana
Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2025 $5,752 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) ($308)
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) ($6,512)
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) ($18)
Landscaping ($3,206)
($10,044)
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($223)
Administration ($1,505)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($74)
($1,802)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail $0
Arterial Landscaping ($16,238)
Arterial Lighting ($1,898)
Parks ($14,617)
($32,753)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($5,923)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) ($254)
($6,177)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $242
Fund Balance Credit $8,547
Additional City Contribution $0
$8,547
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $36,235
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. 3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 12

Page 248 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 98-4
Birchwood Estates
Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2025 $13,144 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) ($837)
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) ($18,489)
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) ($81)
Landscaping ($6,652)
($26,059)
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($574)
Administration ($3,883)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($46)
($4,503)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail $0
Arterial Landscaping ($10,100)
Arterial Lighting ($1,181)
Parks ($9,091)
($20,372)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($15,281)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) ($1,259) ($16,540)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $636
Fund Balance Credit $2,977
Additional City Contribution $19,261
$22,238
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $31,456
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. 3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 13

Page 249 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 98-5
Arroya Seco
Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2025 $106 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) $0
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) ($1,522)
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) $0
Landscaping $0
($1,522)
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($35)
Administration ($235)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($59)
($329)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail ($13,132)
Arterial Landscaping ($12,872)
Arterial Lighting ($1,505)
Parks ($11,586)
($39,095)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($926)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) $0
($926)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $37
Fund Balance Credit $0
Additional City Contribution $11,177
$11,177
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $30,552
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. 3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 14

Page 250 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 99-3
SPA "L"
Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2025 $125,032 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) ($17,932)
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) ($97,774)
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) ($771)
Landscaping ($147,474)
($263,951)
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($5,828)
Administration ($39,389)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($888)
($46,105)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail ($160,058)
Arterial Landscaping ($195,307)
Arterial Lighting ($22,832)
Parks ($175,781)
($553,978)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($155,028)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) ($17,594) ($172,622)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $6,553
Fund Balance Credit $0
Additional City Contribution $305,599
$305,599
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $599,472
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. 3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 15

Page 251 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 99-4
California Grove
Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2025 $10,743 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) ($2,093)
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) ($13,911)
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) ($30)
Landscaping ($5,591)
($21,625)
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($477)
Administration ($3,226)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($65)
($3,768)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail ($14,546)
Arterial Landscaping ($14,258)
Arterial Lighting ($1,667)
Parks ($12,834)
($43,305)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($12,697)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) ($684)
($13,381)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $522
Fund Balance Credit $0
Additional City Contribution $28,043
$28,043
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $42,771
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. 3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 16

Page 252 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 99-5
Deer Ridge Country Club
Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2025 $187,929 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) ($32,238)
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) ($130,933)
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) ($574)
Landscaping ($156,348)
($320,093)
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($7,064)
Administration ($47,748)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($952)
($55,764)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail $0
Arterial Landscaping ($214,276)
Arterial Lighting ($25,049)
Parks ($189,565)
($428,890)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($187,929)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) ($18,728) ($206,657)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $7,892
Fund Balance Credit $0
Additional City Contribution $0
$0
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $815,584
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. 3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 17

Page 253 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 99-6
Trailside
Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2025 $8,890 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) ($773)
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) ($10,251)
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) ($24)
Landscaping ($4,078)
($15,126)
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($334)
Administration ($2,259)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($61)
($2,654)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail ($13,738)
Arterial Landscaping ($13,466)
Arterial Lighting ($1,574)
Parks ($12,121)
($40,899)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($8,890)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) ($1,180) ($10,070)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $379
Fund Balance Credit $2,114
Additional City Contribution $29,528
$31,642
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $27,838
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. 3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 18

Page 254 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 99-7
Termo
Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2025 $65,058 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) ($7,243)
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) ($58,684)
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) ($164)
Landscaping ($44,800)
($110,891)
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($2,446)
Administration ($16,530)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($249)
($19,225)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail $0
Arterial Landscaping ($54,854)
Arterial Lighting ($6,413)
Parks ($49,375)
($110,642)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($65,058)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) ($2,923) ($67,981)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $2,661
Fund Balance Credit $4,748
Additional City Contribution $84,946
$89,694
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $151,326
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. 3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 19

Page 255 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 99-8
Gerry Property
Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2025 $6,616 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) ($1,703)
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) ($5,937)
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) ($10)
Landscaping ($3,528)
($11,178)
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($249)
Administration ($1,681)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($123)
($2,053)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail $0
Arterial Landscaping ($27,130)
Arterial Lighting ($3,172)
Parks ($24,420)
($54,722)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($6,616)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) ($345)
($6,961)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $272
Fund Balance Credit $0
Additional City Contribution $0
$0
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $68,027
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. 3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 20

Page 256 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 99-9
Richmond American
Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2025 $56,329 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) ($3,727)
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) ($72,199)
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) ($145)
Landscaping ($19,937)
($96,008)
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($2,117)
Administration ($14,312)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($221)
($16,650)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail $0
Arterial Landscaping ($48,517)
Arterial Lighting ($5,672)
Parks ($43,671)
($97,860)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($56,329)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) ($3,820) ($60,149)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $2,330
Fund Balance Credit $46,003
Additional City Contribution $0
$46,003
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $166,005
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. 3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 21

Page 257 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 00-2
Lyon Woodfield
Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2025 ($64) In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) ($118)
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) ($5,415)
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) ($12)
Landscaping ($2,090)
($7,635)
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($170)
Administration ($1,146)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($73)
($1,389)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail ($16,364)
Arterial Landscaping ($16,040)
Arterial Lighting ($1,875)
Parks ($14,438)
($48,717)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($4,576)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) ($515)
($5,091)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $191
Fund Balance Credit $0
Additional City Contribution $8,596
$8,596
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $54,109
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. 3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 22

Page 258 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 00-3
California Orchard
Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2025 $15,774 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) ($6,145)
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) ($18,042)
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) ($13)
Landscaping ($2,501)
($26,701)
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($593)
Administration ($4,008)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($245)
($4,846)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail $0
Arterial Landscaping ($55,464)
Arterial Lighting ($6,484)
Parks ($48,788)
($110,736)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($15,774)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) ($783)
($16,557)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $647
Fund Balance Credit $0
Additional City Contribution $0
$0
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $142,420
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. 3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 23

Page 259 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 00-4
Brentwood Park
Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2025 $30,654 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) ($3,500)
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) ($13,824)
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) ($236)
Landscaping ($34,586)
($52,146)
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($1,152)
Administration ($7,788)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($221)
($9,161)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail $0
Arterial Landscaping ($48,517)
Arterial Lighting ($5,672)
Parks ($43,671)
($97,860)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($30,654)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) ($4,304) ($34,958)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $1,312
Fund Balance Credit $0
Additional City Contribution $0
$0
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $162,160
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. 3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 24

Page 260 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 01-1
Laird Project
Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2025 $4,336 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) ($1,203)
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) ($4,966)
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) ($6)
Landscaping ($1,112)
($7,287)
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($163)
Administration ($1,102)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($120)
($1,385)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail ($26,870)
Arterial Landscaping ($26,338)
Arterial Lighting ($3,079)
Parks ($23,707)
($79,994)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($4,336)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) ($6)
($4,342)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $174
Fund Balance Credit $6,214
Additional City Contribution $0
$6,214
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $82,284
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. 3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 25

Page 261 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 02-2
Oakstreet
Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2025 $132,952 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) ($8,419)
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) ($148,021)
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) ($726)
Landscaping ($69,419)
($226,585)
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($4,998)
Administration ($33,780)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($541)
($39,319)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail $0
Arterial Landscaping ($126,987)
Arterial Lighting ($14,845)
Parks ($118,269)
($260,101)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($132,952)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) ($77,523) ($210,475)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $6,869
Fund Balance Credit $0
Additional City Contribution $0
$0
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $596,659
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. 3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 26

Page 262 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 02-3
Apricot Way
Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2025 $103,821 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) ($6,103)
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) ($109,731)
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) ($459)
Landscaping ($60,083)
($176,376)
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($3,903)
Administration ($26,378)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($984)
($31,265)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail ($236,274)
Arterial Landscaping ($231,646)
Arterial Lighting ($27,080)
Parks ($436,081)
($931,081)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($103,821)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) ($9,863) ($113,684)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $4,350
Fund Balance Credit $0
Additional City Contribution $0
$0
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $1,144,236
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. 3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 27

Page 263 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 02-4
Bradock & Logan
Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2025 $13,573 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) ($561)
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) ($15,570)
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) ($63)
Landscaping ($6,943)
($23,137)
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($510)
Administration ($3,449)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($50)
($4,009)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail ($11,314)
Arterial Landscaping ($11,090)
Arterial Lighting ($1,296)
Parks ($9,987)
($33,687)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($13,573)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) ($1,256) ($14,829)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $568
Fund Balance Credit $1,649
Additional City Contribution $0
$1,649
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $59,872
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. 3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 28

Page 264 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 02-5
Sand Creek & Brentwood Boulevard
Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2025 $1,252 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) ($118)
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) ($1,522)
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) $0
Landscaping ($367)
($2,007)
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($47)
Administration ($318)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($131)
($496)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail ($33,169)
Arterial Landscaping ($32,512)
Arterial Lighting ($3,800)
Parks ($27,716)
($97,197)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($1,252)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) $0
($1,252)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $50
Fund Balance Credit $0
Additional City Contribution $0
$0
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $99,651
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. 3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 29

Page 265 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 02-6
Balfour & John Muir
Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2025 $3,461 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) ($10)
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) ($5,385)
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) ($2)
Landscaping ($478)
($5,875)
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($130)
Administration ($879)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($37)
($1,046)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail $0
Arterial Landscaping ($28,228)
Arterial Lighting ($3,300)
Parks ($9,323)
($40,851)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($3,461)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) ($319)
($3,780)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $145
Fund Balance Credit $6,315
Additional City Contribution $0
$6,315
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $41,632
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. 3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 30

Page 266 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 02-7
San Jose & Sand Creek
Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2025 $214 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) $0
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) ($351)
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) $0
Landscaping $0
($351)
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($8)
Administration ($54)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($15)
($77)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail ($22,381)
Arterial Landscaping ($43,682)
Arterial Lighting ($5,106)
Parks ($31,697)
($102,866)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($214)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) $0
($214)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $9
Fund Balance Credit $0
Additional City Contribution $0
$0
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $103,285
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. 3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 31

Page 267 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 02-8
Lone Tree
Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2025 $12 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) $0
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) $0
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) $0
Landscaping $0
$0
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees $0
Administration ($3)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($20)
($23)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail ($20,105)
Arterial Landscaping ($23,217)
Arterial Lighting ($2,714)
Parks ($7,647)
($53,683)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($12)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) $0
($12)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $0
Fund Balance Credit $0
Additional City Contribution $0
$0
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $53,707
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. 3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 32

Page 268 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 02-9
Balfour Plaza
Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2025 $1,228 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) ($125)
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) ($412)
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) ($24)
Landscaping ($1,531)
($2,092)
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($46)
Administration ($312)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($5)
($363)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail $0
Arterial Landscaping ($3,288)
Arterial Lighting ($384)
Parks ($1,131)
($4,803)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($1,228)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) ($27)
($1,255)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $50
Fund Balance Credit $0
Additional City Contribution $0
$0
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $7,236
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. 3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 33

Page 269 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 02-10
Lone Tree Center
Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2025 $18 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) $0
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) ($15)
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) $0
Landscaping $0
($15)
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($1)
Administration ($4)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($15)
($20)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail $0
Arterial Landscaping ($14,494)
Arterial Lighting ($1,694)
Parks ($4,663)
($20,851)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($18)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) $0
($18)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $1
Fund Balance Credit $583
Additional City Contribution $1,580
$2,163
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $18,723
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. 3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 34

Page 270 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 02-11
Lone Tree Plaza
Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2025 $12 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) $0
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) $0
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) $0
Landscaping $0
$0
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees $0
Administration ($3)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($20)
($23)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail ($4,337)
Arterial Landscaping ($38,604)
Arterial Lighting ($4,513)
Parks ($14,027)
($61,481)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($12)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) $0
($12)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $0
Fund Balance Credit $0
Additional City Contribution $0
$0
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $61,505
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. 3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 35

Page 271 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 02-12
Sunset Industrial
Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2025 $9,243 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) ($268)
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) ($6,960)
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) ($87)
Landscaping ($8,459)
($15,774)
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($347)
Administration ($2,348)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($16)
($2,711)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail ($22,713)
Arterial Landscaping ($22,264)
Arterial Lighting ($2,602)
Parks ($4,790)
($52,369)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($9,243)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) ($4,407) ($13,650)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $458
Fund Balance Credit $0
Additional City Contribution $0
$0
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $74,804
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. 3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 36

Page 272 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 02-13
Stonehaven
Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2025 $778 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) $0
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) ($1,288)
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) $0
Landscaping $0
($1,288)
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($29)
Administration ($198)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($41)
($268)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail $0
Arterial Landscaping ($14,103)
Arterial Lighting ($1,649)
Parks ($8,415)
($24,167)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($778)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) ($67)
($845)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $32
Fund Balance Credit $0
Additional City Contribution $0
$0
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $25,758
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. 3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 37

Page 273 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 03-2
Meritage Lone Tree
Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2025 $226,341 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) ($15,249)
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) ($213,567)
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) ($1,705)
Landscaping ($154,773)
($385,294)
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($8,508)
Administration ($57,508)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($1,372)
($67,388)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail ($153,581)
Arterial Landscaping ($305,597)
Arterial Lighting ($35,725)
Parks ($543,666)
($1,038,569)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($226,341)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) ($21,589) ($247,930)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $9,485
Fund Balance Credit $0
Additional City Contribution $0
$0
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $1,503,355
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. 3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 38

Page 274 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 03-3
Brookdale Court
Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2025 $15,453 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) ($2,764)
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) ($9,506)
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) ($82)
Landscaping ($13,930)
($26,282)
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($581)
Administration ($3,926)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($116)
($4,623)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail $0
Arterial Landscaping ($25,496)
Arterial Lighting ($2,981)
Parks ($23,074)
($51,551)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($15,453)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) ($3,834) ($19,287)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $695
Fund Balance Credit $0
Additional City Contribution $0
$0
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $85,596
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. 3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 39

Page 275 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 03-4
Tri City Plaza
Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2025 $3 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) $0
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) $0
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) $0
Landscaping $0
$0
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees $0
Administration ($1)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($5)
($6)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail ($2,291)
Arterial Landscaping ($6,690)
Arterial Lighting ($782)
Parks ($2,993)
($12,756)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($3)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) $0
($3)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $0
Fund Balance Credit $243
Additional City Contribution $0
$243
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $12,519
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. 3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 40

Page 276 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 03-5
West Summerset
Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2025 $10,890 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) ($251)
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) ($6,795)
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) ($79)
Landscaping ($11,396)
($18,521)
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($409)
Administration ($2,767)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($82)
($3,258)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail $0
Arterial Landscaping ($20,627)
Arterial Lighting ($2,411)
Parks ($17,585)
($40,623)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($10,890)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) ($2,660) ($13,550)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $489
Fund Balance Credit $0
Additional City Contribution $0
$0
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $64,574
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. 3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 41

Page 277 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 03-6
Arbor Village
Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2025 $104 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) $0
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) ($351)
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) $0
Landscaping $0
($351)
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($9)
Administration ($61)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($59)
($129)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail $0
Arterial Landscaping ($13,070)
Arterial Lighting ($1,528)
Parks ($11,765)
($26,363)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($240)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) $0
($240)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $10
Fund Balance Credit $2,520
Additional City Contribution $5,877
$8,397
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $18,572
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. 3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 42

Page 278 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 03-7
Garin Ranch Commercial
Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2025 $4 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) $0
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) $0
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) $0
Landscaping $0
$0
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees $0
Administration ($1)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($7)
($8)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail $0
Arterial Landscaping ($4,221)
Arterial Lighting ($493)
Parks ($1,650)
($6,364)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($4)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) $0
($4)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $0
Fund Balance Credit $0
Additional City Contribution $0
$0
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED $6,372
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. 3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 43

Page 279 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 03-8
Blackhawk Commercial
Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2025 $46 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) $0
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) $0
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) $0
Landscaping $0
$0
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($2)
Administration ($12)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($78)
($92)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail $0
Arterial Landscaping ($18,332)
Arterial Lighting ($2,143)
Parks ($13,404)
($33,879)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($46)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) $0
($46)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $2
Fund Balance Credit $0
Additional City Contribution $0
$0
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $33,969
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. 3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 44

Page 280 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 04-2
Balfour Griffith Commercial
Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2025 $3 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) $0
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) $0
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) $0
Landscaping $0
$0
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees $0
Administration ($1)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($5)
($6)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail $0
Arterial Landscaping ($4,108)
Arterial Lighting ($480)
Parks ($3,056)
($7,644)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($3)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) $0
($3)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $0
Fund Balance Credit $262
Additional City Contribution $0
$262
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $7,388
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. 3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 45

Page 281 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 05-2
South Brentwood Boulevard Commercial
Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2025 $1,198 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) ($255)
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) ($1,756)
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) $0
Landscaping $0
($2,011)
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($45)
Administration ($304)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($36)
($385)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail $0
Arterial Landscaping ($9,834)
Arterial Lighting ($1,150)
Parks ($3,893)
($14,877)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($1,198)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) $0
($1,198)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $48
Fund Balance Credit $159
Additional City Contribution $9,148
$9,307
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $7,918
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. 3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 46

Page 282 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 06-2
Palmilla
Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2025 $76,884 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) ($4,306)
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) ($57,707)
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) ($334)
Landscaping ($68,526)
($130,873)
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($2,890)
Administration ($19,534)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($470)
($22,894)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail $0
Arterial Landscaping ($102,184)
Arterial Lighting ($11,946)
Parks ($183,669)
($297,799)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($76,884)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) ($15,828) ($92,712)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $3,392
Fund Balance Credit $0
Additional City Contribution $0
$0
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $464,003
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. 3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 47

Page 283 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 06-3
Vineyards
Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2025 $44,356 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) ($1,892)
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) ($17,107)
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) ($129)
Landscaping ($55,489)
($74,617)
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($1,667)
Administration ($11,270)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($1,158)
($14,095)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail $0
Arterial Landscaping ($263,416)
Arterial Lighting ($30,794)
Parks ($227,207)
($521,417)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($44,356)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) ($3,886) ($48,242)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $1,852
Fund Balance Credit $0
Additional City Contribution $0
$0
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $612,163
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. 3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 48

Page 284 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 06-4
Villa Amador
Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2025 $1 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) $0
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) $0
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) $0
Landscaping $0
$0
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees $0
Administration $0
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($1)
($1)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail ($9,697)
Arterial Landscaping ($9,505)
Arterial Lighting ($1,111)
Parks ($13,689)
($34,002)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($1)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) $0
($1)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $0
Fund Balance Credit $0
Additional City Contribution $0
$0
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $34,004
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. 3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 49

Page 285 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 06-5
Barrington
Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2025 $86,770 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) ($6,618)
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) ($52,925)
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) ($897)
Landscaping ($87,346)
($147,786)
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($3,262)
Administration ($22,046)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($446)
($25,754)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail ($103,024)
Arterial Landscaping ($100,984)
Arterial Lighting ($11,805)
Parks ($177,492)
($393,305)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($86,770)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) ($14,510) ($101,280)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $3,761
Fund Balance Credit $0
Additional City Contribution $0
$0
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $577,594
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. 3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 50

Page 286 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 11-1
North Brentwood Boulevard
Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2025 $2,733 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) ($801)
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) ($4,150)
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) ($20)
Landscaping ($3,457)
($8,428)
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($186)
Administration ($1,258)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($31)
($1,475)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail ($11,617)
Arterial Landscaping ($11,387)
Arterial Lighting ($1,331)
Parks ($13,582)
($37,917)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($4,952)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) ($307)
($5,259)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $204
Fund Balance Credit $0
Additional City Contribution $14,109
$14,109
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $36,033
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. 3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 51

Page 287 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 14-1
Mission Grove
Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2025 $13,334 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) ($917)
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) ($10,857)
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) ($64)
Landscaping ($10,825)
($22,663)
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($501)
Administration ($3,388)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($116)
($4,005)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail $0
Arterial Landscaping ($25,546)
Arterial Lighting ($2,986)
Parks ($22,994)
($51,526)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($13,334)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) ($1,073) ($14,407)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $555
Fund Balance Credit $0
Additional City Contribution $0
$0
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $78,712
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. 3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 52

Page 288 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 14-2
Ferro Ronconi
Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2025 $34,516 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) ($1,800)
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) ($14,304)
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) ($353)
Landscaping ($42,364)
($58,821)
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($1,297)
Administration ($8,770)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($144)
($10,211)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail $0
Arterial Landscaping ($31,685)
Arterial Lighting ($3,704)
Parks ($28,520)
($63,909)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($34,516)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) ($5,704) ($40,220)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $1,495
Fund Balance Credit $0
Additional City Contribution $0
$0
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $137,150
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. 3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 53

Page 289 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 15-1
Bella Fiore
Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2025 $5,795 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) ($99)
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) ($8,683)
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) ($6)
Landscaping ($1,024)
($9,812)
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($218)
Administration ($1,472)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($88)
($1,778)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail ($19,799)
Arterial Landscaping ($19,407)
Arterial Lighting ($2,269)
Parks ($34,937)
($76,412)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($5,795)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) ($7)
($5,802)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $232
Fund Balance Credit $0
Additional City Contribution $0
$0
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $87,777
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. 3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 54

Page 290 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 15-2
Renaissance Estate
Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2025 $5,558 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) ($528)
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) ($2,479)
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) ($13)
Landscaping ($6,466)
($9,486)
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($209)
Administration ($1,412)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($8)
($1,629)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail ($1,818)
Arterial Landscaping ($1,782)
Arterial Lighting ($208)
Parks ($3,209)
($7,017)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($5,558)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) ($149)
($5,707)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $225
Fund Balance Credit $2,764
Additional City Contribution $0
$2,764
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $15,293
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. 3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 55

Page 291 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 16-1
Bond Lane
Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2025 $19,227 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) ($982)
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) ($8,272)
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) ($138)
Landscaping ($23,396)
($32,788)
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($723)
Administration ($4,885)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($57)
($5,665)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail ($12,728)
Arterial Landscaping ($12,476)
Arterial Lighting ($1,458)
Parks ($22,460)
($49,122)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($19,227)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) ($4,403) ($23,630)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $857
Fund Balance Credit $0
Additional City Contribution $0
$0
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $91,122
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. 3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 56

Page 292 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 16-2
Sellers
Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2025 $19,766 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) ($1,921)
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) ($7,171)
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) ($144)
Landscaping ($24,369)
($33,605)
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($743)
Administration ($5,022)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($162)
($5,927)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail $0
Arterial Landscaping ($35,645)
Arterial Lighting ($4,167)
Parks ($32,085)
($71,897)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($19,766)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) ($1,028) ($20,794)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $811
Fund Balance Credit $202
Additional City Contribution $0
$202
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $111,444
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. 3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 57

Page 293 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 17-1
Sparrow
Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2025 $986 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) $0
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) ($1,639)
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) $0
Landscaping $0
($1,639)
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($37)
Administration ($250)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($45)
($332)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail ($10,102)
Arterial Landscaping ($9,902)
Arterial Lighting ($1,158)
Parks ($8,913)
($30,075)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($986)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) $0
($986)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $39
Fund Balance Credit $0
Additional City Contribution $0
$0
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $32,008
3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding. 1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source.

A - 58

Page 294 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 17-2
Catchings Ranch
Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2025 $8,809 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) ($434)
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) ($6,221)
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) ($39)
Landscaping ($8,332)
($15,026)
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($331)
Administration ($2,238)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($22)
($2,591)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail $0
Arterial Landscaping ($4,753)
Arterial Lighting ($556)
Parks ($4,278)
($9,587)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($8,809)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) ($345)
($9,154)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $359
Fund Balance Credit $0
Additional City Contribution $0
$0
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $27,191
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. 3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 59

Page 295 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 17-3
Cornerstone
Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2025 $1 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) $0
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) $0
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) $0
Landscaping $0
$0
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees $0
Administration $0
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($1)
($1)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail ($3,220)
Arterial Landscaping ($3,156)
Arterial Lighting ($369)
Parks ($419)
($7,164)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($1)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) $0
($1)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $0
Fund Balance Credit $0
Additional City Contribution $0
$0
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $7,166
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. 3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 60

Page 296 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 19-1
Terrene
Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2025 $11,371 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) ($237)
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) ($14,151)
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) ($28)
Landscaping ($4,716)
($19,132)
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($427)
Administration ($2,889)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($293)
($3,609)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail ($45,457)
Arterial Landscaping ($64,558)
Arterial Lighting ($7,547)
Parks ($58,110)
($175,672)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($11,371)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) ($6,451) ($17,822)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $584
Fund Balance Credit $0
Additional City Contribution $0
$0
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $204,281
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. 3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 61

Page 297 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 19-2
Alvernaz
Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2025 $9,969 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) ($282)
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) ($11,935)
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) ($27)
Landscaping ($4,599)
($16,843)
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($375)
Administration ($2,533)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($187)
($3,095)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail $0
Arterial Landscaping ($41,190)
Arterial Lighting ($4,815)
Parks ($37,076)
($83,081)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($9,969)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) ($5,117) ($15,086)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $501
Fund Balance Credit $0
Additional City Contribution $0
$0
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $107,635
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. 3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 62

Page 298 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 21-2
Orchard Trails
Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2025 $25,443 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) ($1,217)
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) ($37,730)
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) ($209)
Landscaping ($35,279)
($74,435)
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($1,639)
Administration ($11,081)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($71)
($12,791)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail $0
Arterial Landscaping ($15,545)
Arterial Lighting ($1,817)
Parks ($14,163)
($31,525)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($4,877)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) ($232)
($5,109)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $1,749
Fund Balance Credit $0
Additional City Contribution $0
$0
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $96,668
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. 3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 63

Page 299 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 21-3
Bennett Estates
Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2025 $6,279 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) ($238)
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) ($6,154)
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) ($25)
Landscaping ($4,297)
($10,714)
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($236)
Administration ($1,595)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($13)
($1,844)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail ($2,828)
Arterial Landscaping ($2,772)
Arterial Lighting ($324)
Parks ($2,496)
($8,420)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($4,899)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) ($28)
($4,927)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $252
Fund Balance Credit $578
Additional City Contribution $0
$578
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $18,796
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. 3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 64

Page 300 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 23-1
Orchard Grove
Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2025 $3,000 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) ($1,212)
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) ($10,280)
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) ($97)
Landscaping ($10,394)
($21,983)
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($485)
Administration ($3,276)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($46)
($3,807)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail ($10,000)
Arterial Landscaping ($9,802)
Arterial Lighting ($1,146)
Parks ($8,823)
($29,771)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($12,895)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) $0
($12,895)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $516
Fund Balance Credit $0
Additional City Contribution $0
$0
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $64,940
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. 3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 65

Page 301 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 24-1
Hanson Lane
Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2025 $0 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) $0
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) ($9,027)
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) $0
Landscaping $0
($9,027)
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($201)
Administration ($1,355)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($85)
($1,641)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail ($18,991)
Arterial Landscaping ($18,615)
Arterial Lighting ($2,176)
Parks ($16,755)
($56,537)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($4,442)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) $0
($4,442)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $213
Fund Balance Credit $0
Additional City Contribution $0
$0
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $71,434
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. 3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 66

Page 302 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 24-2
Trumark Trailside
Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2025 $0 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) ($1,207)
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) ($19,936)
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) ($195)
Landscaping ($18,005)
($39,343)
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($867)
Administration ($5,860)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($57)
($6,784)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail ($12,425)
Arterial Landscaping ($12,179)
Arterial Lighting ($1,424)
Parks ($11,230)
($37,258)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($6,659)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) $0
($6,659)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $923
Fund Balance Credit $0
Additional City Contribution $0
$0
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $89,121
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. 3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 67

Page 303 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 24-3
Inez Estates
Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2025 $0 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) ($23)
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) ($916)
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) ($4)
Landscaping ($507)
($1,450)
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($32)
Administration ($217)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($7)
($256)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail ($1,616)
Arterial Landscaping ($1,584)
Arterial Lighting ($185)
Parks ($1,426)
($4,811)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($565)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) $0
($565)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $34
Fund Balance Credit $0
Additional City Contribution $0
$0
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $7,048
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. 3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 68

Page 304 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape Improvements
along Arterial and Major Roadways
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2025 $2,181,369 Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) ($117,158)
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) ($1,011,211)
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) ($11,702)
Landscaping ($2,407,324)
($3,547,395)
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($78,062)
Administration ($527,596)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees $0
($605,658)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($2,181,369)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) ($202,002) ($2,383,371)
City Contribution for General Benefit1 $70,987
Fund Balance Credit $0
Additional City Contribution $407,747
$407,747
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED IN DISTRICTS2 $3,765,433
Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26
1 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. 2 The amount refers to the portion of Arterial Landscape Improvement costs funded by parcels located within the City's seventy (70) Landscaping and Lighting Assessment Districts.

A - 69

Page 305 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 COST ESTIMATE
Street Lighting Improvements
along Arterial and Major Roadways
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2023 $110,130 Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) $0
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) ($493,398)
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) $0
Contractual Services $0
($493,398)
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($10,857)
Administration ($73,382)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees $0
($84,239)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($110,130)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) $0
($110,130)
City Contribution for General Benefit1 $16,232
Fund Balance Credit $0
Additional City Contribution $95,304
$95,304
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED IN DISTRICTS2 $440,183
Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26
1 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. 2 The amount refers to the portion of Arterial Street Lighting Improvement costs funded by parcels located within the City's seventy (70) Landscaping and Lighting Assessment Districts.

A - 70

Page 306 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2023-24 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 COST ESTIMATE
Grant Street Trail
Improvements
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2023 $865,479 Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) ($49,636)
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) ($658,171)
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) ($7,935)
Landscaping ($369,652)
($1,085,394)
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($23,883)
Administration ($161,428)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees $0
($185,311)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($865,479)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) ($17,407) ($882,886)
City Contribution for General Benefit1 $90,168
Fund Balance Credit $0
Additional City Contribution $110,027
$110,027
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED IN DISTRICTS2 $1,057,995
Proposed Fiscal Year 2023-24
1 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. 2 The amount refers to the portion of Grant Street Trail Improvement costs funded by parcels located within the City's seventy (70) Landscaping and Lighting Assessment Districts.

A - 71

Page 307 of 790 ends

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2025-26 APPENDIX B

APPENDIX B

ASSESSMENT ROLL

Page 308 of 790 ends

CITY OF BRENTWOOD

LANDSCAPE & LIGHTING DISTRICT

PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL
Fiscal Year 2025-26
94-1E - Brentwood Country Club
Assessor's
Parcel No.

Assessment
Amount
010-780-001 $441.36
010-780-002 $441.36
010-780-003 $441.36
010-780-004 $441.36
010-780-005 $441.36
010-780-006 $441.36
010-780-007 $441.36
010-780-008 $441.36
010-780-009 $441.36
010-780-010 $441.36
010-780-011 $441.36
010-780-012 $441.36
010-780-013 $441.36
010-780-014 $441.36
010-780-015 $441.36
010-780-016 $441.36
010-780-017 $441.36
010-780-018 $441.36
010-780-019 $441.36
010-780-020 $441.36
010-780-021 $441.36
010-780-022 $441.36
010-780-023 $441.36
010-780-024 $441.36
010-780-025 $441.36
010-780-026 $441.36
010-780-027 $441.36
010-780-028 $441.36
010-780-029 $441.36
010-780-030 $441.36
010-780-031 $441.36
010-780-032 $441.36
010-780-033 $441.36
010-780-034 $441.36
010-780-035 $441.36
010-790-001 $441.36
010-790-002 $441.36
010-790-003 $441.36
010-790-004 $441.36
010-790-005 $441.36
010-790-006 $441.36
010-790-007 $441.36
010-790-008 $441.36
010-790-009 $441.36
010-790-010 $441.36
010-790-011 $441.36
010-790-012 $441.36
010-790-013 $441.36
010-790-014 $441.36
010-790-015 $441.36
010-790-016 $441.36
010-790-017 $441.36
010-790-018 $441.36
010-790-019 $441.36
010-790-020 $441.36
Assessor's
Parcel No.

Assessment
Amount
010-790-021 $441.36
010-790-022 $441.36
010-790-023 $441.36
010-790-024 $441.36
010-790-025 $441.36
010-790-026 $441.36
010-790-027 $441.36
010-790-028 $441.36
010-790-029 $441.36
010-790-030 $441.36
010-790-031 $441.36
010-790-032 $441.36
010-790-033 $441.36
010-790-034 $441.36
010-790-035 $441.36
010-790-036 $441.36
010-790-037 $441.36
010-790-038 $441.36
010-790-039 $441.36
010-790-040 $441.36
010-790-041 $441.36
010-790-042 $441.36
010-790-043 $441.36
010-790-044 $441.36
010-790-045 $441.36
010-800-001 $441.36
010-800-002 $441.36
010-800-003 $441.36
010-800-004 $441.36
010-800-005 $441.36
010-800-006 $441.36
010-800-007 $441.36
010-800-008 $441.36
010-800-009 $441.36
010-800-010 $441.36
010-800-011 $441.36
010-800-012 $441.36
010-800-013 $441.36
010-800-014 $441.36
010-800-015 $441.36
010-800-016 $441.36
010-800-017 $441.36
010-800-018 $441.36
010-800-019 $441.36
010-800-020 $441.36
010-800-021 $441.36
010-800-022 $441.36
010-800-023 $441.36
010-800-024 $441.36
010-800-025 $441.36
010-800-026 $441.36
010-800-027 $441.36
010-800-028 $441.36
010-800-029 $441.36
010-800-030 $441.36
Assessor's
Parcel No.

Assessment
Amount
010-800-031 $441.36
010-800-032 $441.36
010-800-033 $441.36
010-800-034 $441.36
010-800-035 $441.36
010-800-036 $441.36
010-800-037 $441.36
010-800-038 $441.36
010-800-039 $441.36
010-800-040 $441.36
010-800-041 $441.36
010-800-042 $441.36
010-800-043 $441.36
010-800-044 $441.36
010-800-045 $441.36
010-800-046 $441.36
010-800-047 $441.36
010-800-048 $441.36
010-800-049 $441.36
010-800-050 $441.36
010-800-051 $441.36
010-800-052 $441.36
010-800-053 $441.36
010-800-054 $441.36
010-800-055 $441.36
010-800-056 $441.36
010-800-057 $441.36
010-810-001 $441.36
010-810-002 $441.36
010-810-003 $441.36
010-810-004 $441.36
010-810-005 $441.36
010-810-006 $441.36
010-810-007 $441.36
010-810-008 $441.36
010-810-009 $441.36
010-810-010 $441.36
010-810-011 $441.36
010-810-012 $441.36
010-810-013 $441.36
010-810-014 $441.36
010-810-015 $441.36
010-810-016 $441.36
010-810-017 $441.36
010-810-018 $441.36
010-810-019 $441.36
010-810-020 $441.36
010-810-021 $441.36
010-810-022 $441.36
010-810-023 $441.36
010-810-024 $441.36
010-810-025 $441.36
010-810-026 $441.36
010-810-027 $441.36
010-810-028 $441.36
Assessor's
Parcel No.

Assessment
Amount
010-810-029 $441.36
010-810-030 $441.36
010-810-031 $441.36
010-810-032 $441.36
010-810-033 $441.36
010-810-034 $441.36
010-810-035 $441.36
010-810-036 $441.36
010-810-037 $441.36
010-810-038 $441.36
010-810-039 $441.36
010-810-040 $441.36
010-810-041 $441.36
010-810-042 $441.36
010-810-043 $441.36
010-810-044 $441.36
010-810-045 $441.36
010-810-046 $441.36
010-810-047 $441.36
010-810-048 $441.36
010-810-049 $441.36
010-810-050 $441.36
010-810-051 $441.36
010-810-052 $441.36
010-810-053 $441.36
010-810-054 $441.36
010-810-055 $441.36
010-810-056 $441.36
010-810-057 $441.36
010-810-058 $441.36
010-810-059 $441.36
010-810-060 $441.36
010-810-061 $441.36
010-810-062 $441.36
010-810-063 $441.36
010-810-064 $441.36
010-810-065 $441.36
010-810-066 $441.36
010-810-067 $441.36
010-810-068 $441.36
010-810-069 $441.36
010-810-070 $441.36
010-810-071 $441.36
010-810-072 $441.36
010-810-073 $441.36
010-810-074 $441.36
010-810-075 $441.36
010-810-076 $441.36
010-810-077 $441.36
010-810-078 $441.36
010-810-079 $441.36
010-810-080 $441.36
010-810-081 $441.36
010-810-082 $441.36
010-810-083 $441.36
- 1 - 04/19/25

Page 309 of 790 ends

CITY OF BRENTWOOD

LANDSCAPE & LIGHTING DISTRICT

PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL
Fiscal Year 2025-26
94-1E - Brentwood Country Club
Assessor's
Parcel No.

Assessment
Amount
010-810-084 $441.36
010-810-085 $441.36
010-810-086 $441.36
010-810-087 $441.36
010-810-088 $441.36
010-810-089 $441.36
010-810-090 $441.36
010-810-091 $441.36
010-810-092 $441.36
010-810-093 $441.36
010-810-094 $441.36
010-810-095 $441.36
010-810-096 $441.36
010-810-097 $441.36
010-810-098 $441.36
010-810-099 $441.36
010-810-100 $441.36
010-810-101 $441.36
010-810-102 $441.36
010-810-103 $441.36
010-810-104 $441.36
010-810-105 $441.36
010-810-106 $441.36
010-820-001 $441.36
010-820-002 $441.36
010-820-003 $441.36
010-820-004 $441.36
010-820-005 $441.36
010-820-006 $441.36
010-820-007 $441.36
010-820-008 $441.36
010-820-009 $441.36
010-820-010 $441.36
010-820-011 $441.36
010-820-012 $441.36
010-820-013 $441.36
010-820-014 $441.36
010-820-015 $441.36
010-820-016 $441.36
010-820-017 $441.36
010-820-018 $441.36
010-820-019 $441.36
010-820-020 $441.36
010-820-021 $441.36
010-820-022 $441.36
010-820-023 $441.36
010-820-024 $441.36
010-820-025 $441.36
010-820-026 $441.36
010-820-027 $441.36
010-820-028 $441.36
010-820-029 $441.36
010-820-030 $441.36
010-820-031 $441.36
010-820-032 $441.36
Assessor's
Parcel No.

Assessment
Amount
010-820-033 $441.36
010-820-034 $441.36
010-820-035 $441.36
010-820-036 $441.36
010-820-037 $441.36
010-820-038 $441.36
010-820-039 $441.36
010-820-040 $441.36
010-820-041 $441.36
010-820-042 $441.36
010-820-043 $441.36
010-820-044 $441.36
010-820-045 $441.36
010-820-046 $441.36
010-820-047 $441.36
010-820-048 $441.36
010-820-049 $441.36
010-820-050 $441.36
010-820-051 $441.36
010-820-052 $441.36
010-820-053 $441.36
010-820-054 $441.36
010-820-055 $441.36
010-820-056 $441.36
010-820-057 $441.36
010-820-058 $441.36
010-820-059 $441.36
010-820-060 $441.36
010-820-061 $441.36
010-820-062 $441.36
010-820-063 $441.36
010-820-064 $441.36
010-820-065 $441.36
010-820-066 $441.36
010-820-067 $441.36
010-820-068 $441.36
010-820-069 $441.36
010-820-070 $441.36
010-820-071 $441.36
010-820-072 $441.36
010-820-073 $441.36
010-820-074 $441.36
010-820-075 $441.36
010-820-076 $441.36
010-820-077 $441.36
010-820-078 $441.36
010-820-079 $441.36
010-820-080 $441.36
010-820-081 $441.36
010-820-082 $441.36
010-820-083 $441.36
010-820-084 $441.36
010-820-085 $441.36
010-820-086 $441.36
Assessor's
Parcel No.

Assessment
Amount
TOTAL: 329 $145,207.44
- 2 - 04/19/25

Page 310 of 790 ends

CITY OF BRENTWOOD

LANDSCAPE & LIGHTING DISTRICT

PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL
Fiscal Year 2025-26
94-1EC - Brentwood Country Club
Assessor's
Parcel No.

Assessment
Amount
010-030-030 $9,576.38
010-030-031 $1,449.64
012-020-015 $181.20
012-020-019 $274.54
012-020-020 $1,855.96
012-020-021 $944.46
012-020-022 $768.74
012-020-025 $188.88
012-020-026 $1,510.04
012-020-027 $112.02
012-020-028 $2,400.68
TOTAL: 11 $19,262.54
- 3 - 04/19/25

Page 311 of 790 ends

CITY OF BRENTWOOD

LANDSCAPE & LIGHTING DISTRICT

PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL
Fiscal Year 2025-26
94-1N - Brentwood Country Club
Assessor's
Parcel No.

Assessment
Amount
019-150-028 $5,187.84
019-161-001 $247.50
019-161-002 $247.50
019-161-003 $247.50
019-161-004 $247.50
019-161-005 $247.50
019-161-006 $247.50
019-161-007 $247.50
019-161-008 $247.50
019-161-009 $247.50
019-161-010 $247.50
019-161-011 $247.50
019-161-012 $247.50
019-161-013 $247.50
019-161-014 $247.50
019-161-015 $247.50
019-161-016 $247.50
019-161-017 $247.50
019-161-018 $247.50
019-161-019 $247.50
019-161-025 $247.50
019-161-026 $247.50
019-161-027 $247.50
019-162-001 $247.50
019-162-002 $247.50
019-162-003 $247.50
019-162-004 $247.50
019-162-005 $247.50
019-162-006 $247.50
019-162-007 $247.50
019-162-008 $247.50
019-162-009 $247.50
019-171-002 $247.50
019-171-003 $247.50
019-171-004 $247.50
019-171-005 $247.50
019-171-006 $247.50
019-171-007 $247.50
019-171-008 $247.50
019-171-009 $247.50
019-171-010 $247.50
019-171-011 $247.50
019-171-012 $61.88
019-171-013 $247.50
019-171-014 $247.50
019-171-015 $247.50
019-171-016 $247.50
019-171-017 $247.50
019-171-018 $247.50
019-171-019 $247.50
019-171-020 $247.50
019-172-001 $247.50
019-172-002 $247.50
019-172-003 $247.50
019-172-004 $247.50
Assessor's
Parcel No.

Assessment
Amount
019-172-005 $247.50
019-172-006 $247.50
019-172-007 $247.50
019-172-008 $247.50
019-172-009 $247.50
019-172-010 $247.50
019-172-011 $247.50
019-181-001 $247.50
019-181-002 $247.50
019-181-003 $247.50
019-181-004 $247.50
019-181-005 $247.50
019-181-006 $247.50
019-181-007 $247.50
019-181-008 $247.50
019-181-009 $247.50
019-181-010 $247.50
019-181-011 $247.50
019-181-012 $247.50
019-181-013 $247.50
019-181-014 $247.50
019-181-015 $247.50
019-181-016 $247.50
019-181-017 $247.50
019-181-018 $247.50
019-181-019 $247.50
019-181-020 $247.50
019-181-023 $247.50
019-181-024 $247.50
019-181-025 $247.50
019-181-026 $247.50
019-181-027 $247.50
019-182-001 $247.50
019-182-002 $247.50
019-182-003 $247.50
019-182-004 $247.50
019-182-005 $247.50
019-182-006 $247.50
019-182-007 $247.50
019-182-008 $247.50
019-182-009 $247.50
019-183-001 $247.50
019-183-002 $247.50
019-183-003 $247.50
019-183-004 $247.50
019-183-005 $247.50
019-183-006 $247.50
019-183-007 $247.50
019-183-008 $247.50
019-183-009 $247.50
019-183-010 $247.50
019-183-011 $247.50
019-183-012 $247.50
019-183-013 $247.50
019-183-014 $247.50
Assessor's
Parcel No.

Assessment
Amount
019-183-015 $247.50
019-183-016 $247.50
019-183-017 $247.50
019-191-001 $247.50
019-191-002 $247.50
019-191-003 $247.50
019-191-004 $247.50
019-191-005 $247.50
019-191-006 $247.50
019-191-007 $247.50
019-191-008 $247.50
019-191-009 $247.50
019-191-010 $247.50
019-191-011 $247.50
019-191-012 $247.50
019-191-013 $247.50
019-191-014 $247.50
019-191-015 $247.50
019-191-016 $247.50
019-191-017 $247.50
019-191-018 $247.50
019-191-019 $247.50
019-191-020 $247.50
019-191-021 $247.50
019-191-022 $247.50
019-191-023 $247.50
019-191-024 $247.50
019-191-025 $247.50
019-192-001 $247.50
019-192-002 $247.50
019-192-003 $247.50
019-192-004 $247.50
019-192-005 $247.50
019-192-006 $247.50
019-192-007 $247.50
019-192-008 $247.50
019-192-009 $247.50
019-192-010 $247.50
019-192-011 $247.50
019-192-012 $247.50
019-192-013 $247.50
019-192-014 $247.50
019-193-001 $247.50
019-193-002 $247.50
019-193-003 $247.50
019-193-004 $247.50
019-193-005 $247.50
019-193-006 $247.50
019-193-007 $247.50
019-193-008 $247.50
019-193-009 $247.50
019-193-010 $247.50
019-193-011 $247.50
019-193-012 $247.50
019-193-013 $247.50
Assessor's
Parcel No.

Assessment
Amount
019-193-014 $247.50
019-193-015 $247.50
019-193-016 $247.50
019-193-017 $247.50
019-193-018 $247.50
019-193-019 $247.50
019-193-020 $247.50
019-193-021 $247.50
019-193-022 $247.50
019-193-023 $247.50
019-193-024 $247.50
019-193-025 $247.50
019-193-026 $247.50
019-193-027 $247.50
019-193-028 $247.50
019-200-001 $247.50
019-200-002 $247.50
019-200-003 $247.50
019-200-004 $247.50
019-200-005 $247.50
019-200-006 $247.50
019-200-007 $247.50
019-200-008 $247.50
019-200-009 $247.50
019-200-010 $247.50
019-200-011 $247.50
019-200-012 $247.50
019-200-013 $247.50
019-200-014 $247.50
019-200-015 $247.50
019-200-016 $247.50
019-200-019 $247.50
019-200-020 $247.50
019-200-021 $247.50
019-200-022 $247.50
019-200-023 $247.50
019-200-024 $247.50
019-200-025 $247.50
019-200-026 $247.50
019-200-027 $247.50
019-200-028 $247.50
019-200-029 $247.50
019-200-030 $247.50
019-200-031 $247.50
019-200-032 $247.50
019-200-033 $247.50
019-200-034 $247.50
019-200-035 $247.50
019-200-036 $247.50
019-200-037 $247.50
019-200-038 $247.50
019-200-039 $247.50
019-200-040 $247.50
019-200-041 $247.50
019-200-042 $247.50
- 4 - 04/19/25

Page 312 of 790 ends
← All documents from this meeting