Cities Index.
Agenda packet, second session

Brentwood City Council
May 27, 2025

Document
Agenda packet, second session
Meeting
May 27, 2025
Body
Brentwood City Council
Pages
950
Original file
67.0 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on pub-brentwood.escribemeetings.com. That file is the official record.

Parking Garage Security & Safety Enhancements CA 05-21-25 GENERAL CONDITIONS CIP Project No. 337-37262 Page 14
Design Professional means the licensed individual(s) or firm(s) retained by City to provide architectural, engineering, or other design professional services for the Project. If no Design Professional has been retained for this Project, any reference to Design Professional is deemed to refer to the Engineer.

DIR means the California Department of Industrial Relations.

Drawings has the same meaning as Plans.

Engineer means the City Engineer for the City of Brentwood and their authorized delegees.

Excusable Delay is defined in Section 5.3(B), Excusable Delay.

Extra Work means new or unforeseen work added to the Project, as determined by the Engineer in their sole discretion, including Work that was not part of or incidental to the scope of the Work when the Contract was executed; Work that is substantially different from the Work as described in the Contract Documents at the time the Contract was executed; or Work that results from a substantially differing and unforeseeable condition.

Final Completion means Contractor has fully completed all of the Work required by the Contract Documents to the City’s satisfaction, including all punch list items and any required commissioning or training, and has provided the City with all required submittals, including the instructions and manuals, product warranties, and as-built drawings.

Final Payment means payment to Contractor of the unpaid Contract Price, including release of undisputed retention, less amounts withheld or deducted pursuant to the Contract Documents.

Furnish means to purchase and deliver for the Project.

Government Code Claim means a claim submitted pursuant to California Government Code § 900 et seq.

Hazardous Materials means any substance or material identified now or in the future as hazardous under any Laws, or any other substance or material that may be considered hazardous or otherwise subject to Laws governing handling, disposal, or cleanup.

Including, whether or not capitalized, means “including, but not limited to,” unless the context clearly requires otherwise.

Inspector means the individual(s) or firm(s) retained or employed by City to inspect the workmanship, materials, and manner of construction of the Project and its components to ensure compliance with the Contract Documents and all Laws.

Install means to fix in place for materials, and to fix in place and connect for equipment.

Laws means all applicable local, state, and federal laws, regulations, rules, codes, ordinances, permits, orders, and the like enacted or imposed by or under the auspices of any governmental entity with jurisdiction over any of the Work or any performance of the Work, including health and safety requirements.

Non-Excusable Delay is defined in Section 5.3(D), Non-Excusable Delay.

Plans means the City-provided plans, drawings, details, or graphical depictions of the Project requirements, but does not include Shop Drawings.

Page 124 of 950 ends

Parking Garage Security & Safety Enhancements CA 05-21-25 GENERAL CONDITIONS CIP Project No. 337-37262 Page 15
Project means the public works project referenced in the Contract, as modified by any Project alternates elected by City, if any.

Project Manager means the individual designated by City to oversee and manage the Project on City’s behalf and may include their authorized delegee(s) when the Project Manager is unavailable. If no Project Manager has been designated for this Project, any reference to Project Manager is deemed to refer to the Engineer.

Recoverable Costs is defined in Section 5.3(F), Recoverable Costs.

Request for Information or RFI means Contractor’s written request for information about the Contract Documents, the Work or the Project, submitted to City in the manner and format specified by City.

Section, when capitalized in these General Conditions, means a numbered section or subsection of the General Conditions, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise.

Shop Drawings means drawings, plan details or other graphical depictions prepared by or on behalf of Contractor, and subject to City acceptance, which are intended to provide details for fabrication, installation, and the like, of items required by or shown in the Plans or Specifications.

Specialty Work means Work that must be performed by a specialized Subcontractor with the specified license or other special certification, and that the Contractor is not qualified to selfperform.

Specifications means the technical, text specifications describing the Project requirements, which are prepared for and incorporated into the Contract by or on behalf of City, and does not include the Contract, General Conditions or Special Conditions.

Subcontractor means an individual, partnership, corporation, or joint-venture retained by Contractor directly or indirectly through a subcontract to perform a specific portion of the Work.

The term Subcontractor applies to subcontractors of all tiers, unless otherwise indicated by the context. A third party such as a utility performing related work on the Project is not a Subcontractor, even if Contractor must coordinate its Work with the third party.

Technical Specifications has the same meaning as Specifications.

Work means all of the construction and services necessary for or incidental to completing the Project in conformance with the requirements of the Contract Documents.

Work Day or Working Day, whether or not capitalized, means a weekday when the City is open for business, and does not include holidays observed by the City.

Worksite means the place or places where the Work is performed, which includes, but may extend beyond the Project site, including separate locations for staging, storage, or fabrication.

Article 2 - Roles and Responsibilities

2.1 City.
(A) City Council. The City Council has final authority in all matters affecting the Project, except to the extent it has delegated authority to the Engineer. (B) Engineer. The Engineer, acting within the authority conferred by the City Council, is responsible for administration of the Project on behalf of City, including

Page 125 of 950 ends

Parking Garage Security & Safety Enhancements CA 05-21-25 GENERAL CONDITIONS CIP Project No. 337-37262 Page 16
authority to provide directions to the Design Professional and to Contractor to ensure proper and timely completion of the Project. The Engineer’s decisions are final and conclusive within the scope of their authority, including interpretation of the Contract Documents.
(C) Project Manager. The Project Manager assigned to the Project will be the primary point of contact for the Contractor and will serve as City’s representative for daily administration of the Project on behalf of City. Unless otherwise specified, all of Contractor’s communications to City (in any form) will go to or through the Project Manager. City reserves the right to reassign the Project Manager role at any time or to delegate duties to additional City representatives, without prior notice to or consent of Contractor.
(D) Design Professional. The Design Professional is responsible for the overall design of the Project and, to the extent authorized by City, may act on City’s behalf to ensure performance of the Work in compliance with the Plans and Specifications, including any design changes authorized by Change Order. The Design Professional’s duties may include review of Contractor’s submittals, visits to any Worksite, inspecting the Work, evaluating test and inspection results, and participation in Project-related meetings, including any pre-construction conference, weekly meetings, and coordination meetings. The Design Professional’s interpretation of the Plans or Specifications is final and conclusive.

2.2 Contractor.
(A) General. Contractor must provide all labor, materials, supplies, equipment, services, and incidentals necessary to perform and timely complete the Work in strict accordance with the Contract Documents, and in an economical and efficient manner in the best interests of City, and with minimal inconvenience to the public. (B) Responsibility for the Work and Risk of Loss. Contractor is responsible for supervising and directing all aspects of the Work to facilitate the efficient and timely completion of the Work. Contractor is solely responsible for and required to exercise full control over the Work, including the construction means, methods, techniques, sequences, procedures, safety precautions and programs, and coordination of all portions of the Work with that of all other contractors and Subcontractors, except to the extent that the Contract Documents provide other specific instructions. Contractor’s responsibilities extend to any plan, method or sequence suggested, but not required by City or specified in the Contract Documents. From the date of commencement of the Work until either the date on which City formally accepts the Project or the effective date of termination of the Contract, whichever is later, Contractor bears all risks of injury or damage to the Work and the materials and equipment delivered to any Worksite, by any cause including fire, earthquake, wind, weather, vandalism, or theft. (C) Project Administration. Contractor must provide sufficient and competent administration, staff, and skilled workforce necessary to perform and timely complete the Work in accordance with the Contract Documents. Before starting the Work, Contractor must designate in writing and provide complete contact information, including telephone numbers and email address, for the officer or employee in Contractor’s organization who is to serve as Contractor’s primary representative for the Project, and who has authority to act on Contractor’s behalf. A Subcontractor may not serve as Contractor’s primary representative.
(D) On-Site Superintendent. Contractor must, at all times during performance of the Work, provide a qualified and competent full-time superintendent acceptable to City, and assistants as necessary, who must be physically present at the Project site while any

Page 126 of 950 ends

Parking Garage Security & Safety Enhancements CA 05-21-25 GENERAL CONDITIONS CIP Project No. 337-37262 Page 17
aspect of the Work is being performed. The superintendent must have full authority to act and communicate on behalf of Contractor, and Contractor will be bound by the superintendent’s communications to City. City’s approval of the superintendent is required before the Work commences. If City is not satisfied with the superintendent’s performance, City may request a qualified replacement of the superintendent. Failure to comply may result in temporary suspension of the Work, at Contractor’s sole expense and with no extension of Contract Time, until an approved superintendent is physically present to supervise the Work. Contractor must provide written notice to City, as soon as practicable, before replacing the superintendent.
(E) Standards. Contractor must, at all times, ensure that the Work is performed in an efficient, skillful manner following best practices and in full compliance with the Contract Documents, Laws, and applicable manufacturer’s recommendations. Contractor has a material and ongoing obligation to provide true and complete information, to the best of its knowledge, with respect to all records, documents, or communications pertaining to the Project, including oral or written reports, statements, certifications, Change Order requests, or Claims.
(F) Meetings. Contractor, its project manager, superintendent and any primary Subcontractors requested by City, must attend a pre-construction conference, if requested by City, as well as weekly Project progress meetings scheduled with City. If applicable, Contractor may also be required to participate in coordination meetings with other parties relating to other work being performed on or near the Project site or in relation to the Project, including work or activities performed by City, other contractors, or other utility owners.
(G) Construction Records. Contractor will maintain up-to-date, thorough, legible, and dated daily job reports, which document all significant activity on the Project for each day that Work is performed on the Project. The daily report for each day must include the number of workers at the Project site; primary Work activities; major deliveries; problems encountered, including injuries, if any; weather and site conditions; and delays, if any.

Contractor will take date and time-stamped photographs to document general progress of the Project, including site conditions prior to construction activities, before and after photographs at offset trench laterals, existing improvements and utilities, damage and restoration. Contractor will maintain copies of all subcontracts, Project-related correspondence with Subcontractors, and records of meetings with Subcontractors. Upon request by the City, Contractor will permit review of and/or provide copies of any of these construction records.
(H) Responsible Party. Contractor is solely responsible to City for the acts or omissions of any Subcontractors, or any other party or parties performing portions of the Work or providing equipment, materials or services for or on behalf of Contractor or the Subcontractors. Upon City’s written request, Contractor must promptly and permanently remove from the Project, at no cost to City, any employee or Subcontractor or employee of a Subcontractor who the Engineer has determined to be incompetent, intemperate or disorderly, or who has failed or refused to perform the Work as required under the Contract Documents.
(I) Correction of Defects. Contractor must promptly correct, at Contractor’s sole expense, any Work that is determined by City to be deficient or defective in any way, including workmanship, materials, parts, or equipment. Workmanship, materials, parts, or equipment that do not conform to the requirements under the Plans, Specifications, and other Contract Documents, as determined by City, will be considered defective and subject to rejection. Contractor must also promptly correct, at Contractor’s sole expense, any Work performed beyond the lines and grades shown on the Plans or established by City, and any Extra Work performed without City’s prior written approval. If Contractor

Page 127 of 950 ends

Parking Garage Security & Safety Enhancements CA 05-21-25 GENERAL CONDITIONS CIP Project No. 337-37262 Page 18
fails to correct or to take reasonable steps toward correcting defective Work within five days following notice from City, or within the time specified in City’s notice to correct, City may elect to have the defective Work corrected by its own forces or by a third party, in which case the cost of correction will be deducted from the Contract Price. If City elects to correct defective Work due to Contractor’s failure or refusal to do so, City or its agents will have the right to take possession of and use any equipment, supplies, or materials available at the Project site or any Worksite on City property, in order to effectuate the correction, at no extra cost to City. Contractor’s warranty obligations under Section 11.2, Warranty, will not be waived nor limited by City’s actions to correct defective Work under these circumstances. Alternatively, City may elect to retain defective Work, and deduct the difference in value, as determined by the Engineer, from payments otherwise due to Contractor. This paragraph applies to any defective Work performed by Contractor during the one-year warranty period under Section 11.2.
(J) Contractor’s Records. Contractor must maintain all of its records relating to the Project in any form, including paper documents, photos, videos, electronic records, approved samples, and the construction records required pursuant to paragraph (G), above. Project records subject to this provision include complete Project cost records and records relating to preparation of Contractor’s price proposal for the Contract, including estimates, take-offs, and price quotes or bids.
(1) Contractor’s cost records must include all supporting documentation, including original receipts, invoices, and payroll records, evidencing its direct costs to perform the Work, including, but not limited to, costs for labor, materials, and equipment. Each cost record should include, at a minimum, a description of the expenditure with references to the applicable requirements of the Contract Documents, the amount actually paid, the date of payment, and whether the expenditure is part of the original Contract Price, related to an executed Change Order, or otherwise categorized by Contractor as Extra Work. Contractor’s failure to comply with this provision as to any claimed cost operates as a waiver of any rights to recover the claimed cost.
(2) Contractor must continue to maintain its Project-related records in an organized manner for a period of five years after City’s acceptance of the Project or following Contract termination, whichever occurs first. Subject to prior notice to Contractor, City is entitled to inspect or audit any of Contractor’s records relating to the Project during Contractor’s normal business hours. Contractor’s records may also be subject to examination and audit by the California State Auditor, pursuant to Government Code § 8546.7. The record-keeping requirements set forth in this subsection 2.2(J) will survive expiration or termination of the Contract.
(K) Copies of Project Documents. Contractor and its Subcontractors must keep copies, at the Project site, of all Work-related documents, including the Contract, permit(s), Plans, Specifications, addenda, Contract amendments, Change Orders, RFIs and RFI responses, Shop Drawings, as-built drawings, schedules, daily records, testing and inspection reports or results, and any related written interpretations. These documents must be available to City for reference at all times during construction of the Project.

2.3 Subcontractors.
(A) General. All Work which is not performed by Contractor with its own forces must be performed by Subcontractors. City reserves the right to approve or reject any and all Subcontractors proposed to perform the Work, for reasons including the Subcontractor’s poor reputation, lack of relevant experience, financial instability, and lack of technical

Page 128 of 950 ends

Parking Garage Security & Safety Enhancements CA 05-21-25 GENERAL CONDITIONS CIP Project No. 337-37262 Page 19
ability or adequate trained workforce. Each Subcontractor must obtain a City business license before performing any Work.
(B) Contractual Obligations. Contractor must require each Subcontractor to comply with the provisions of the Contract Documents as they apply to the Subcontractor’s portion(s) of the Work, including the generally applicable terms of the Contract Documents, and to likewise bind their subcontractors. Contractor will provide that the rights that each Subcontractor may have against any manufacturer or supplier for breach of warranty or guarantee relating to items provided by the Subcontractor for the Project, will be assigned to City. Nothing in these Contract Documents creates a contractual relationship between a Subcontractor and City, but City is deemed to be a third-party beneficiary of the contract between Contractor and each Subcontractor. (C) Termination. If the Contract is terminated, each Subcontractor’s agreement must be assigned by Contractor to City, subject to the prior rights of any surety, but only if and to the extent that City accepts, in writing, the assignment by written notification, and assumes all rights and obligations of Contractor pursuant to each such subcontract agreement.
(D) Substitution of Subcontractor. If Contractor requests substitution of a listed Subcontractor under Public Contract Code § 4107, Contractor is solely responsible for all costs City incurs in responding to the request, including legal fees and costs to conduct a hearing, and any increased subcontract cost to perform the Work that was to be performed by the listed Subcontractor. If City determines that a Subcontractor is unacceptable to City based on the Subcontractor’s failure to satisfactorily perform its Work, or for any of the grounds for substitution listed in Public Contract Code § 4107(a), City may request removal of the Subcontractor from the Project. Upon receipt of a written request from City to remove a Subcontractor pursuant to this paragraph, Contractor will immediately remove the Subcontractor from the Project and, at no further cost to City, will either (1) self-perform the remaining Work to the extent that Contractor is duly licensed and qualified to do so, or (2) substitute a Subcontractor that is acceptable to City, in compliance with Public Contract Code § 4107, as applicable.

2.4 Coordination of Work.
(A) Concurrent Work. City reserves the right to perform, have performed, or permit performance of other work on or adjacent to the Project site while the Work is being performed for the Project. Contractor is responsible for coordinating its Work with other work being performed on or adjacent to the Project site, including by any utility companies or agencies, and must avoid hindering, delaying, or interfering with the work of other contractors, individuals, or entities, and must ensure safe and reasonable site access and use as required or authorized by City. To the full extent permitted by law, Contractor must hold harmless and indemnify City against any and all claims arising from or related to Contractor’s avoidable, negligent, or willful hindrance of, delay to, or interference with the work of any utility company or agency or another contractor or subcontractor.
(B) Coordination. If Contractor’s Work will connect or interface with work performed by others, Contractor is responsible for independently measuring and visually inspecting such work to ensure a correct connection and interface. Contractor is responsible for any failure by Contractor or its Subcontractors to confirm measurements before proceeding with connecting Work. Before proceeding with any portion of the Work affected by the construction or operations of others, Contractor must give the Project Manager prompt written notification of any defects Contractor discovers which will prevent the proper execution of the Work. Failure to give notice of any known or reasonably discoverable defects will be deemed acknowledgement by Contractor that the work of others is not

Page 129 of 950 ends

Parking Garage Security & Safety Enhancements CA 05-21-25 GENERAL CONDITIONS CIP Project No. 337-37262 Page 20
defective and will not prevent the proper execution of the Work. Contractor must also promptly notify City if work performed by others, including work or activities performed by City’s own forces, is operating to hinder, delay, or interfere with Contractor’s timely performance of the Work. City reserves the right to backcharge Contractor for any additional costs incurred due to Contractor’s failure to comply with the requirements in this Section 2.4.

2.5 Submittals. Unless otherwise specified, Contractor must submit to the Engineer for review and acceptance, all schedules, Shop Drawings, samples, product data, and similar submittals required by the Contract Documents, or upon request by the Engineer.

Unless otherwise specified, all submittals, including Requests for Information, are subject to the general provisions of this Section, as well as specific submittal requirements that may be included elsewhere in the Contract Documents, including the Special Conditions or Specifications. The Engineer may require submission of a submittal schedule at or before a pre-construction conference, as may be specified in the Notice to Proceed. (A) General. Contractor is responsible for ensuring that its submittals are accurate and conform to the Contract Documents.
(B) Time and Manner of Submission. Contractor must ensure that its submittals are prepared and delivered in a manner consistent with the current City-accepted schedule for the Work and within the applicable time specified in the Contract Documents, or if no time is specified, in such time and sequence so as not to delay the performance of the Work or completion of the Project.
(C) Required Contents. Each submittal must include the Project name and contract number, Contractor’s name and address, the name and address of any Subcontractor or supplier involved with the submittal, the date, and references to applicable Specification section(s) and/or drawing and detail number(s).
(D) Required Corrections. If corrections are required, Contractor must promptly make and submit any required corrections as specified in full conformance with the requirements of this Section, or other requirements that apply to that submittal. (E) Effect of Review and Acceptance. Review and acceptance of a submittal by City will not relieve Contractor from complying with the requirements of the Contract Documents. Contractor is responsible for any errors in any submittal, and review or acceptance of a submittal by City is not an assumption of risk or liability by City. (F) Enforcement. Any Work performed or any material furnished, installed, fabricated or used without City’s prior acceptance of a required submittal is performed or provided at Contractor’s risk, and Contractor may be required to bear the costs incident thereto, including the cost of removing and replacing such Work, repairs to other affected portions of the Work or material, and the cost of additional time or services required of City, including costs for the Design Professional, Project Manager, or Inspector. (G) Excessive RFIs. A RFI will be considered excessive or unnecessary if City determines that the explanation or response to the RFI is clearly and unambiguously discernable from the Contract Documents. City’s costs to review and respond to excessive or unnecessary RFIs may be deducted from payments otherwise due to Contractor.

2.6 Shop Drawings. When Shop Drawings are required by the Specifications or requested by the Engineer, they must be prepared according to best practices at Contractor’s expense. The Shop Drawings must be of a size and scale to clearly show all necessary details. Unless otherwise specified by City, Shop Drawings must be provided to the

Page 130 of 950 ends

Parking Garage Security & Safety Enhancements CA 05-21-25 GENERAL CONDITIONS CIP Project No. 337-37262 Page 21
Engineer for review and acceptance at least 30 days before the Work will be performed.

If City requires changes, the corrected Shop Drawings must be resubmitted to the Engineer for review within the time specified by the Engineer. For all Project components requiring Shop Drawings, Contractor will not furnish materials or perform any Work until the Shop Drawings for those components are accepted by City. Contractor is responsible for any errors or omissions in the Shop Drawings, shop fits and field corrections; any deviations from the Contract Documents; and for the results obtained by the use of Shop Drawings. Acceptance of Shop Drawings by City does not relieve Contractor of Contractor’s responsibility.

2.7 Access to Work. Contractor must afford prompt and safe access to any Worksite by City and its employees, agents, or consultants authorized by City; and upon request by City, Contractor must promptly arrange for City representatives to visit or inspect manufacturing sites or fabrication facilities for items to be incorporated into the Work.

2.8 Personnel. Contractor and its Subcontractors must employ only competent and skillful personnel to perform the Work. Contractor and its Subcontractor’s supervisors, security or safety personnel, and employees who have unescorted access to the Project site must possess proficiency in English sufficient to read, understand, receive, and implement oral or written communications or instructions relating to their respective job functions, including safety and security requirements. Upon written notification from the Engineer, Contractor and its Subcontractors must immediately discharge any personnel who are incompetent, disorderly, disruptive, threatening, abusive, or profane, or otherwise refuse or fail to comply with the requirements of the Contract Documents or Laws, including Laws pertaining to health and safety. Any such discharged personnel may not be reemployed or permitted on the Project in any capacity without City’s prior written consent.

Article 3 - Contract Documents

3.1 Interpretation of Contract Documents.
(A) Plans and Specifications. The Plans and Specifications included in the Contract Documents are complementary. If Work is shown on one but not on the other, Contractor must perform the Work as though fully described on both, consistent with the Contract Documents and reasonably inferable from them as being necessary to produce the indicated results. The Plans and Specifications are deemed to include and require everything necessary and reasonably incidental to completion of the Work, whether or not particularly mentioned or shown. Contractor must perform all Work and services and supply all things reasonably related to and inferable from the Contract Documents. In the event of a conflict between the Plans and Specifications, the Specifications will control, unless the drawing(s) at issue are dated later than the Specification(s) at issue. Detailed drawings take precedence over general drawings, and large-scale drawings take precedence over smaller scale drawings. Any arrangement or division of the Plans and Specifications into sections is for convenience and is not intended to limit the Work required by separate trades. A conclusion presented in the Plans or Specifications is only a recommendation. Actual locations and depths must be determined by Contractor’s field investigation. Contractor may request access to underlying or background information in City’s possession that is necessary for Contractor to form its own conclusions. (B) Duty to Notify and Seek Direction. If Contractor becomes aware of a changed condition in the Project, or of any ambiguity, conflict, inconsistency, discrepancy, omission, or error in the Contract Documents, including the Plans or Specifications, Contractor must promptly submit a Request for Information to the Engineer and wait for a response from City before proceeding further with the related Work. The RFI must notify City of the issue and request clarification, interpretation or direction. The Engineer’s

Page 131 of 950 ends

Parking Garage Security & Safety Enhancements CA 05-21-25 GENERAL CONDITIONS CIP Project No. 337-37262 Page 22
clarification, interpretation or direction will be final and binding on Contractor. If Contractor proceeds with the related Work before obtaining City’s response, Contractor will be responsible for any resulting costs, including the cost of correcting any incorrect or defective Work that results. Timely submission of a clear and complete RFI is essential to avoiding delay. Delay resulting from Contractor’s failure to submit a timely and complete RFI to the Engineer is Non-Excusable Delay. If Contractor believes that City’s response to an RFI justifies a change to the Contract Price or Contract Time, Contractor must perform the Work as directed, but may submit a timely Change Order request in accordance with the Contract Documents. (See Articles 5 and 6.) (C) Figures and Dimensions. Figures control over scaled dimensions. (D) Technical or Trade Terms. Any terms that have well-known technical or trade meanings will be interpreted in accordance with those meanings, unless otherwise specifically defined in the Contract Documents.
(E) Measurements. Contractor must verify all relevant measurements in the Contract Documents and at the Project site before ordering any material or performing any Work, and will be responsible for the correctness of those measurements or for costs that could have been avoided by independently verifying measurements. (F) Compliance with Laws. The Contract Documents are intended to comply with Laws and will be interpreted to comply with Laws.

3.2 Order of Precedence. Information included in one Contract Document but not in another will not be considered a conflict or inconsistency. Unless otherwise specified in the Special Conditions, in case of any conflict or inconsistency among the Contract Documents, the following order of precedence will apply, beginning from highest to lowest, with the most recent version taking precedent over an earlier version:
(A) Change Orders;
(B) Addenda;
(C) Contract;
(D) Notice to Proceed;
(E) Attachment B – Federal Contract Requirements (only if used); (F) Special Conditions;
(G) General Conditions;
(H) Payment and Performance Bonds;
(I) Specifications;
(J) Plans;
(K) Notice of Potential Award;
(L) the City’s standard specifications, as applicable; and (M) Any generic documents prepared by and on behalf of a third party, that were not prepared specifically for this Project, such as the Caltrans Standard Specifications or Caltrans Special Provisions.

3.3 Caltrans Standard Specifications. Any reference to or incorporation of the Standard Specifications of the State of California, Department of Transportation (“Caltrans”), including “Standard Specifications,” “Caltrans Specifications,” “State Specifications,” or “CSS,” means the most current edition of Caltrans’ Standard Specifications, unless otherwise specified (“Caltrans Standard Specifications”), including the most current amendments as of the date that the Contract was fully executed. The following provisions apply to use of or reference to the Caltrans Standard Specifications or Special Provisions:

Page 132 of 950 ends

Parking Garage Security & Safety Enhancements CA 05-21-25 GENERAL CONDITIONS CIP Project No. 337-37262 Page 23
(A) Limitations. The “General Provisions” of the Caltrans Standard Specifications, i.e., sections 1 through 9, do not apply to these Contract Documents with the exception of any specific provisions, if any, which are expressly stated to apply to these Contract Documents.
(B) Conflicts or Inconsistencies. If there is a conflict or inconsistency between any provision in the Caltrans Standard Specifications or Special Provisions and a provision of these Contract Documents, as determined by City, the provision in the Contract Documents will govern.
(C) Meanings. Terms used in the Caltrans Standard Specifications or Special Provisions are to be interpreted as follows:
(1) Any reference to the “Engineer” is deemed to mean the City Engineer. (2) Any reference to the “Special Provisions” is deemed to mean the Special Conditions, unless the Caltrans Special Provisions are expressly included in the Contract Documents listed in Section 2 of the Contract. (3) Any reference to the “Department” or “State” is deemed to mean City.

3.4 For Reference Only. Contractor is responsible for the careful review of any document, study, or report provided by City or appended to the Contract Documents solely for informational purposes and identified as “For Reference Only.” Nothing in any document, study, or report so appended and identified is intended to supplement, alter, or void any provision of the Contract Documents. Contractor is advised that City or its representatives may be guided by information or recommendations included in such reference documents, particularly when making determinations as to the acceptability of proposed materials, methods, or changes in the Work. Any record drawings or similar final or accepted drawings or maps that are not part of the Contract Documents are deemed to be For Reference Only. The provisions of the Contract Documents are not modified by any perceived or actual conflict with provisions in any document that is provided For Reference Only.

3.5 Current Versions. Unless otherwise specified by City, any reference to standard specifications, technical specifications, or any City or state codes or regulations means the latest specification, code, or regulation in effect on the date the Contract was fully executed .

3.6 Conformed Copies. If City prepares a conformed set of the Contract Documents following award of the Contract, it will provide Contractor with two hard copy (paper) sets and one copy of the electronic file in PDF format. It is Contractor’s responsibility to ensure that all Subcontractors, including fabricators, are provided with the conformed set of the Contract Documents at Contractor’s sole expense.

3.7 Ownership. No portion of the Contract Documents may be used for any purpose other than construction of the Project, without prior written consent from City. Contractor is deemed to have conveyed the copyright in any designs, drawings, specifications, Shop Drawings, or other documents (in paper or electronic form) developed by Contractor for the Project, and City will retain all rights to such works, including the right to possession.

Article 4 - Bonds, Indemnity, and Insurance

4.1 Payment and Performance Bonds. Within ten days following issuance of the Notice of Potential Award, Contractor is required to provide a payment bond and a performance

Page 133 of 950 ends

Parking Garage Security & Safety Enhancements CA 05-21-25 GENERAL CONDITIONS CIP Project No. 337-37262 Page 24
bond, each in the penal sum of not less than 100% of the Contract Price, and each executed by Contractor and its surety using the bond forms included with the Contract Documents.
(A) Surety. Each bond must be issued and executed by a surety admitted in California. If an issuing surety cancels the bond or becomes insolvent, within seven days following written notice from City, Contractor must substitute a surety acceptable to City.

If Contractor fails to substitute an acceptable surety within the specified time, City may, at its sole discretion, withhold payment from Contractor until the surety is replaced to City’s satisfaction, or terminate the Contract for default.
(B) Supplemental Bonds for Increase in Contract Price. If the Contract Price increases during construction by five percent or more over the original Contract Price, Contractor must provide supplemental or replacement bonds within ten days of written notice from City pursuant to this Section, covering 100% of the increased Contract Price and using the bond forms included with the Contract Documents.

4.2 Indemnity. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Contractor must indemnify, defend, and hold harmless City, its Council, officers, officials, employees, agents, volunteers, and consultants (individually, an “Indemnitee,” and collectively the “Indemnitees”) from and against any and all liability, loss, damage, claims, causes of action, demands, charges, fines, costs, and expenses (including, without limitation, attorney fees, expert witness fees, paralegal fees, and fees and costs of litigation or arbitration) (collectively, “Liability”) of every nature arising out of or in connection with the acts or omissions of Contractor, its employees, Subcontractors, representatives, or agents, in performing the Work or in failing to comply with any obligation of Contractor under the Contract, except such Liability caused by the active negligence, sole negligence, or willful misconduct of an Indemnitee. This indemnity requirement applies to any Liability arising from alleged defects in the content or manner of submission of Contractor’s price proposal for the Contract. Contractor’s failure or refusal to timely accept a tender of defense pursuant to this Contract will be deemed a material breach of the Contract. City will timely notify Contractor upon receipt of any third-party claim relating to the Contract, as required by Public Contract Code § 9201. Contractor waives any right to express or implied indemnity against any Indemnitee. Contractor’s indemnity obligations under this Contract will survive the expiration or any early termination of the Contract.

4.3 Insurance. No later than ten days following issuance of the Notice of Potential Award, Contractor must procure and provide proof of the insurance coverage required by this Section in the form of certificates and endorsements acceptable to City. The required insurance must cover the activities of Contractor and its Subcontractors relating to or arising from the performance of the Work, and must remain in full force and effect at all times during the period covered by the Contract, through the date of City’s acceptance of the Project. All required insurance must be issued by a company licensed to do business in the State of California, and each such insurer must have an A.M. Best’s financial strength rating of “A” or better and a financial size rating of “VIII” or better. If Contractor fails to provide any of the required coverage in full compliance with the requirements of the Contract Documents, City may, at its sole discretion, purchase such coverage at Contractor’s expense and deduct the cost from payments due to Contractor, or terminate the Contract for default. The procurement of the required insurance will not be construed to limit Contractor’s liability under this Contract or to fulfill Contractor’s indemnification obligations under this Contract.
(A) Policies and Limits. The following insurance policies and limits are required for this Contract, unless otherwise specified in the Special Conditions:

Page 134 of 950 ends

Parking Garage Security & Safety Enhancements CA 05-21-25 GENERAL CONDITIONS CIP Project No. 337-37262 Page 25
(1) Commercial General Liability (“CGL”) Insurance: The CGL insurance policy must be issued on an occurrence basis, written on a comprehensive general liability form, and must include coverage for liability arising from Contractor’s or its Subcontractor’s acts or omissions in the performance of the Work, including contractor’s protective coverage, contractual liability, products and completed operations, and broad form property damage, with limits of at least $5,000,000 per occurrence and at least $10,000,000 general aggregate. The CGL insurance coverage may be arranged under a single policy for the full limits required or by a combination of underlying policies with the balance provided by excess or umbrella policies, provided each such policy complies with the requirements set forth in this Section, including required endorsements. This policy does not exclude explosion, collapse, underground excavation hazard, or removal of lateral support.
(2) Automobile Liability Insurance: The automobile liability insurance policy must provide coverage of at least $2,000,000 combined single-limit per accident for bodily injury, death, or property damage, including hired and non-owned auto liability.
(3) Workers’ Compensation Insurance and Employer’s Liability: The workers’ compensation and employer’s liability insurance policy must comply with the requirements of the California Labor Code, providing coverage of at least $1,000,000 or as otherwise required by the statute. If Contractor is self-insured, Contractor must provide its Certificate of Permission to Self-Insure, duly authorized by the DIR.
(4) Pollution Liability Insurance: The pollution liability insurance policy must be issued on an occurrence basis, providing coverage of at least $2,000,000 for all loss arising out of claims for bodily injury, death, property damage, or environmental damage caused by pollution conditions resulting from the Work. (5) Builder’s Risk Insurance: The builder’s risk insurance policy must be issued on an occurrence basis, for all-risk or “all perils” coverage on a 100% completed value basis on the insurable portion of the Project for the benefit of City. (6) The inclusion of more than one insured will not operate to impair the rights of one insured against another, and the coverages afforded will apply as though separate policies have been issued to each insured
(B) Notice. Each certificate of insurance must state that the coverage afforded by the policy or policies will not be reduced, cancelled or allowed to expire without at least 30 days written notice to City, unless due to non-payment of premiums, in which case ten days written notice must be made to City.
(C) Waiver of Subrogation. Each required policy must include an endorsement providing that the carrier will waive any right of subrogation it may have against City. (D) Required Endorsements. The CGL policy, automobile liability policy, pollution liability policy, and builder’s risk policy must include the following specific endorsements:
(1) The City, including its Council, officials, officers, employees, agents, volunteers and consultants (collectively, “Additional Insured”) must be named as an additional insured for all liability arising out of the operations by or on behalf of the named insured, and the policy must protect the Additional Insured against any and all liability for personal injury, death or property damage or destruction arising directly or indirectly in the performance of the Contract. The additional

Page 135 of 950 ends

Parking Garage Security & Safety Enhancements CA 05-21-25 GENERAL CONDITIONS CIP Project No. 337-37262 Page 26
insured endorsement must be provided using ISO form CG 20 10 11 85 or equivalent form(s) approved by the City.
(2) The insurance provided by Contractor is primary and no insurance held or owned by any Additional Insured may be called upon to contribute to a loss. (E) Contractor’s Responsibilities. This Section 4.3 establishes the minimum requirements for Contractor’s insurance coverage in relation to this Project, but is not intended to limit Contractor’s ability to procure additional or greater coverage. Contractor is responsible for its own risk assessment and needs and is encouraged to consult its insurance provider to determine what coverage it may wish to carry beyond the minimum requirements of this Section. Contractor is solely responsible for the cost of its insurance coverage, including premium payments, deductibles, or self-insured retentions, and no Additional Insured will be responsible or liable for any of the cost of Contractor’s insurance coverage.
(F) Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions that apply to the required insurance (collectively, “deductibles”) in excess of $100,000 are subject to approval by the City’s Risk Manager, acting in their sole discretion, and must be declared by Contractor when it submits its certificates of insurance and endorsements pursuant to this Section 4.3. If the City’s Risk Manager determines that the deductibles are unacceptably high, at City’s option, Contractor must either reduce or eliminate the deductibles as they apply to City and all required Additional Insured; or must provide a financial guarantee, to City’s satisfaction, guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigation, claim administration, and legal expenses. (G) Subcontractors. Contractor must ensure that each Subcontractor is required to maintain the same insurance coverage required under this Section 4.3, with respect to its performance of Work on the Project, including those requirements related to the Additional Insureds and waiver of subrogation, but excluding pollution liability or builder’s risk insurance unless otherwise specified in the Special Conditions. A Subcontractor may be eligible for reduced insurance coverage or limits, but only to the extent approved in writing in advance by the City’s Risk Manager. Contractor must confirm that each Subcontractor has complied with these insurance requirements before the Subcontractor is permitted to begin Work on the Project. Upon request by the City, Contractor must provide certificates and endorsements submitted by each Subcontractor to prove compliance with this requirement. The insurance requirements for Subcontractors do not replace or limit the Contractor’s insurance obligations.

Article 5 - Contract Time

5.1 Time is of the Essence. Time is of the essence in Contractor’s performance and completion of the Work, and Contractor must diligently prosecute the Work and complete it within the Contract Time.
(A) General. Contractor must commence the Work on the date indicated in the Notice to Proceed and must fully complete the Work in strict compliance with all requirements of the Contract Documents and within the Contract Time. Contractor may not begin performing the Work before the date specified in the Notice to Proceed. (B) Authorization. Contractor is not entitled to compensation or credit for any Work performed before the date specified in the Notice to Proceed, with the exception of any schedules, submittals, or other requirements, if any, that must be provided or performed before issuance of the Notice to Proceed.

Page 136 of 950 ends

Parking Garage Security & Safety Enhancements CA 05-21-25 GENERAL CONDITIONS CIP Project No. 337-37262 Page 27
(C) Rate of Progress. Contractor and its Subcontractors must, at all times, provide workers, materials, and equipment sufficient to maintain the rate of progress necessary to ensure full completion of the Work within the Contract Time. If City determines that Contractor is failing to prosecute the Work at a sufficient rate of progress, City may, in its sole discretion, direct Contractor to provide additional workers, materials, or equipment, or to work additional hours or days without additional cost to City, in order to achieve a rate of progress satisfactory to City. If Contractor fails to comply with City’s directive in this regard, City may, at Contractor’s expense, separately contract for additional workers, materials, or equipment or use City’s own forces to achieve the necessary rate of progress. Alternatively, City may terminate the Contract based on Contractor’s default.

5.2 Schedule Requirements. Contractor must prepare all schedules using standard, commercial scheduling software acceptable to the Engineer, and must provide the schedules in electronic and paper form as requested by the Engineer. In addition to the general scheduling requirements set forth below, Contractor must also comply with any scheduling requirements included in the Special Conditions or in the Technical Specifications.
(A) Baseline (As-Planned) Schedule. Within ten calendar days following City’s issuance of the Notice to Proceed (or as otherwise specified in the Notice to Proceed), Contractor must submit to City for review and acceptance a baseline (as-planned) schedule using critical path methodology showing in detail how Contractor plans to perform and fully complete the Work within the Contract Time, including labor, equipment, materials, and fabricated items. The baseline schedule must show the order of the major items of Work and the dates of start and completion of each item, including when the materials and equipment will be procured. The schedule must also include the work of all trades, reflecting anticipated labor or crew hours and equipment loading for the construction activities, and must be sufficiently comprehensive and detailed to enable progress to be monitored on a day-by-day basis. For each activity, the baseline schedule must be dated, provided in the format specified in the Contract Documents or as required by City, and must include, at a minimum, a description of the activity, the start and completion dates of the activity, and the duration of the activity. (1) Specialized Materials Ordering. Within five calendar days following issuance of the Notice to Proceed, Contractor must order any specialized material or equipment for the Work that is not readily available from material suppliers.

Contractor must also retain documentation of the purchase order date(s). (B) City’s Review of Schedules. City will review and may note exceptions to the baseline schedule, and to the progress schedules submitted as required below, to assure completion of the Work within the Contract Time. Contractor is solely responsible for resolving any exceptions noted in a schedule and, within seven days, must correct the schedule to address the exceptions. City’s review or acceptance of Contractor’s schedules will not operate to waive or limit Contractor’s duty to complete the Project within the Contract Time, nor to waive or limit City’s right to assess liquidated damages for Contractor’s unexcused failure to do so.
(C) Progress Schedules. After City accepts the final baseline schedule with no exceptions, Contractor must submit an updated progress schedule and three-week lookahead schedule, in the format specified by City, for review and acceptance with each application for a progress payment, or when otherwise specified by City, until completion of the Work. The updated progress schedule must: show how the actual progress of the Work as constructed to date compares to the baseline schedule; reflect any proposed changes in the construction schedule or method of operations, including to achieve Project milestones within the Contract Time; and identify any actual or potential impacts

Page 137 of 950 ends

Parking Garage Security & Safety Enhancements CA 05-21-25 GENERAL CONDITIONS CIP Project No. 337-37262 Page 28
to the critical path. Contractor must also submit periodic reports to City of any changes in the projected material or equipment delivery dates for the Project. (1) Float. The progress schedule must show early and late completion dates for each task. The number of days between those dates will be designated as the “float.” Any float belongs to the Project and may be allocated by the Engineer to best serve timely completion of the Project.
(2) Failure to Submit Schedule. Reliable, up-to-date schedules are essential to efficient and cost-effective administration of the Project and timely completion. If Contractor fails to submit a schedule within the time periods specified in this Section, or submits a schedule to which City has noted exceptions that are not corrected, City may withhold up to five percent from payment(s) otherwise due to Contractor until the exceptions are resolved, the schedule is corrected and resubmitted, and City has accepted the schedule. In addition, Contractor’s failure to comply with the schedule requirements in this Section 5.2 will be deemed a material default and a waiver of any claims for Excusable Delay or loss of productivity arising during any period when Contractor is out of compliance, subject only to the limits of Public Contract Code § 7102. (D) Recovery Schedule. If City determines that the Work is more than one week behind schedule, within seven days following written notice of such determination, Contractor must submit a recovery schedule, showing how Contractor intends to perform and complete the Work within the Contract Time, based on actual progress to date. (E) Effect of Acceptance. Contractor and its Subcontractors must perform the Work in accordance with the most current City-accepted schedule unless otherwise directed by City. City’s acceptance of a schedule does not operate to extend the time for completion of the Work or any component of the Work, and will not affect City’s right to assess liquidated damages for Contractor’s unexcused delay in completing the Work within the Contract Time.
(F) Posting. Contractor must at all times prominently post a copy of the most current City-accepted progress or recovery schedule in its on-site office. (G) Reservation of Rights. City reserves the right to direct the sequence in which the Work must be performed or to make changes in the sequence of the Work in order to facilitate the performance of work by City or others, or to facilitate City’s use of its property. The Contract Time or Contract Price may be adjusted to the extent such changes in sequence actually increase or decrease Contractor’s time or cost to perform the Work.
(H) Authorized Working Days and Times. Contractor is limited to working Monday through Friday, excluding holidays, during City’s normal business hours, except as provided in the Special Conditions or as authorized in writing by City. City reserves the right to charge Contractor for additional costs incurred by City due to Work performed on days or during hours not expressly authorized in the Contract Documents, including reimbursement of costs incurred for inspection, testing, and construction management services.

5.3 Delay and Extensions of Contract Time.
(A) Notice of Delay. If Contractor becomes aware of any actual or potential delay affecting the critical path, Contractor must promptly notify the Engineer in writing, regardless of the nature or cause of the delay, so that City has a reasonable opportunity to mitigate or avoid the delay.

Page 138 of 950 ends

Parking Garage Security & Safety Enhancements CA 05-21-25 GENERAL CONDITIONS CIP Project No. 337-37262 Page 29
(B) Excusable Delay. The Contract Time may be extended if Contractor encounters “Excusable Delay,” which is an unavoidable delay in completing the Work within the Contract Time due to causes completely beyond Contractor’s control, and which Contractor could not have avoided or mitigated through reasonable care, planning, foresight, and diligence, provided that Contractor is otherwise fully performing its obligations under the Contract Documents. Grounds for Excusable Delay may include fire, natural disasters including earthquake or unusually severe weather, acts of terror or vandalism, epidemic, unforeseeable adverse government actions, unforeseeable actions of third parties, encountering unforeseeable hazardous materials, unforeseeable site conditions, or suspension for convenience under Article 13. The Contract Time will not be extended based on circumstances which will not unavoidably delay completing the Work within the Contract Time based on critical path analysis. (C) Weather Delays. A “Weather Delay Day” is a Working Day during which Contractor and its forces, including Subcontractors, are unable to perform more than 40% of the critical path Work scheduled for that day due to adverse weather conditions which impair the ability to safely or effectively perform the scheduled critical path Work that day.

Adverse weather conditions may include rain, saturated soil, and Project site clean-up required due to adverse weather. Determination of what constitutes critical path Work scheduled for that day will be based on the most current, City-approved schedule.

Contractor will be entitled to a non-compensable extension of the Contract Time for each Weather Delay Day in excess of the normal Weather Delay Days within a given month as determined by reliable records, including monthly rainfall averages, for the preceding ten years (or as otherwise specified in the Special Conditions or Specifications). (1) Contractor must fully comply with the applicable procedures in Articles 5 and 6 of the General Conditions regarding requests to modify the Contract Time. (2) Contractor will not be entitled to an extension of time for a Weather Delay Day to the extent Contractor is responsible for concurrent delay on that day.
(3) Contractor must take reasonable steps to mitigate the consequences of Weather Delay Days, including prudent workforce management and protecting the Work, Project Site, materials, and equipment.
(D) Non-Excusable Delay. Delay which Contractor could have avoided or mitigated through reasonable care, planning, foresight, and diligence is “Non-Excusable Delay.” Contractor is not entitled to an extension of Contract Time or any compensation for NonExcusable Delay, or for Excusable Delay that is concurrent with Non-Excusable Delay.

Non-Excusable Delay includes delay caused by:
(1) weather conditions which are normal for the location of the Project, as determined by reliable records, including monthly rainfall averages, for the preceding ten years;
(2) Contractor’s failure to order equipment and materials sufficiently in advance of the time needed for completion of the Work within the Contract Time; (3) Contractor’s failure to provide adequate notification to utility companies or agencies for connections or services necessary for completion of the Work within the Contract Time;

Page 139 of 950 ends

Parking Garage Security & Safety Enhancements CA 05-21-25 GENERAL CONDITIONS CIP Project No. 337-37262 Page 30
(4) foreseeable conditions which Contractor could have ascertained from reasonably diligent inspection of the Project site or review of the Contract Documents or other information provided or available to Contractor; (5) Contractor’s failure, refusal, or financial inability to perform the Work within the Contract Time, including insufficient funds to pay its Subcontractors or suppliers;
(6) performance or non-performance by Contractor’s Subcontractors or suppliers;
(7) the time required to respond to excessive RFIs (see Section 2.5(G)); (8) delayed submission of required submittals, or the time required for correction and resubmission of defective submittals;
(9) time required for repair of, re-testing, or re-inspection of defective Work; (10) enforcement of Laws by City, or outside agencies with jurisdiction over the Work; or
(11) City’s exercise or enforcement of any of its rights or Contractor’s duties pursuant to the Contract Documents, including correction of defective Work, extra inspections or testing due to non-compliance with Contract requirements, safety compliance, environmental compliance, or rejection and return of defective or deficient submittals.
(E) Compensable Delay. Pursuant to Public Contract Code § 7102, in addition to entitlement to an extension of Contract Time, Contractor is entitled to compensation for costs incurred due to delay caused solely by City, when that delay is unreasonable under the circumstances involved and not within the contemplation of the parties (“Compensable Delay”). Contractor is not entitled to an extension of Contract Time or recovery of costs for Compensable Delay that is concurrent with Non-Excusable Delay.

Delay due to causes that are beyond the control of either City or Contractor, including Weather Delay Days, discovery of Historic or Archeological Items pursuant to Section

7.18, or the actions or inactions of third parties or other agencies, is not Compensable Delay, and will only entitle Contractor to an extension of time commensurate with the time lost due to such delay.
(F) Recoverable Costs. Contractor is not entitled to compensation for Excusable Delay unless it is Compensable Delay, as defined above. Contractor is entitled to recover only the actual, direct, reasonable, and substantiated costs (“Recoverable Costs”) for each working day that the Compensable Delay prevents Contractor from proceeding with more than 50% of the critical path Work scheduled for that day, based on the most recent progress schedule accepted by City. Recoverable Costs will not include home office overhead or lost profit.
(G) Request for Extension of Contract Time or Recoverable Costs. A request for an extension of Contract Time or any associated Recoverable Costs must be submitted in writing to City within ten calendar days of the date the delay is first encountered, even if the duration of the delay is not yet known at that time, or any entitlement to the Contract Time extension or to the Recoverable Costs will be deemed waived. In addition to complying with the requirements of this Article 5, the request must be submitted in compliance with the Change Order request procedures in Article 6 below. Strict compliance with these requirements is necessary to ensure that any delay or consequences of delay may be mitigated as soon as possible, and to facilitate costPage 140 of 950 Parking Garage Security & Safety Enhancements CA 05-21-25 GENERAL CONDITIONS CIP Project No. 337-37262 Page 31
efficient administration of the Project and timely performance of the Work. Any request for an extension of Contract Time or Recoverable Costs that does not strictly comply with all of the requirements of Article 5 and Article 6 will be deemed waived. (1) Required Contents. The request must include a detailed description of the cause(s) of the delay and must also describe the measures that Contractor has taken to mitigate the delay and/or its effects, including efforts to mitigate the cost impact of the delay, such as by workforce management or by a change in sequencing. If the delay is still ongoing at the time the request is submitted, the request should also include Contractor’s plan for continued mitigation of the delay or its effects.
(2) Delay Days and Costs. The request must specify the number of days of Excusable Delay claimed or provide a realistic estimate if the duration of the delay is not yet known. If Contractor believes it is entitled to Recoverable Costs for Compensable Delay, the request must specify the amount and basis for the Recoverable Costs that are claimed or provide a realistic estimate if the amount is not yet known. Any estimate of delay duration or cost must be updated in writing and submitted with all required supporting documentation as soon as the actual time and cost is known. The maximum extension of Contract Time will be the number of days, if any, by which an Excusable Delay or a Compensable Delay exceeds any concurrent Non-Excusable Delay. Contractor is entitled to an extension of Contract Time, or compensation for Recoverable Costs, only if, and only to the extent that, such delay will unavoidably delay Final Completion. (3) Supporting Documentation. The request must also include any and all supporting documentation necessary to evidence the delay and its actual impacts, including scheduling and cost impacts with a time impact analysis using critical path methodology and demonstrating the unavoidable delay to Final Completion. The time impact analysis must be submitted in a form or format acceptable to City.
(4) Burden of Proof. Contractor has the burden of proving that: the delay was an Excusable Delay or Compensable Delay, as defined above; Contractor has fully complied with its scheduling obligations in Section 5.2, Schedule Requirements; Contractor has made reasonable efforts to mitigate the delay and its schedule and cost impacts; the delay will unavoidably result in delaying Final Completion; and any Recoverable Costs claimed by Contractor were actually incurred and were reasonable under the circumstances.
(5) Legal Compliance. Nothing in this Section 5.3 is intended to require the waiver, alteration, or limitation of the applicability of Public Contract Code § 7102. (6) No Waiver. Any grant of an extension of Contract Time, or compensation for Recoverable Costs due to Compensable Delay, will not operate as a waiver of City’s right to assess liquidated damages for Non-Excusable Delay. (7) Dispute Resolution. In the event of a dispute over entitlement to an extension of Contract Time or compensation for Recoverable Costs, Contractor may not stop Work pending resolution of the dispute, but must continue to comply with its duty to diligently prosecute the performance and timely completion of the Work. Contractor’s sole recourse for an unresolved dispute based on City’s rejection of a Change Order request for an extension of Contract Time or compensation for Recoverable Costs is to comply with the dispute resolution provisions set forth in Article 12 below.

Page 141 of 950 ends

Parking Garage Security & Safety Enhancements CA 05-21-25 GENERAL CONDITIONS CIP Project No. 337-37262 Page 32

5.4 Liquidated Damages. It is expressly understood that if Final Completion is not achieved within the Contract Time, City will suffer damages from the delay that are difficult to determine and accurately specify. Pursuant to Public Contract Code § 7203, if Contractor fails to achieve Final Completion within the Contract Time due to Contractor’s NonExcusable Delay, City will charge Contractor in the amount specified in the Contract for each calendar day that Final Completion is delayed beyond the Contract Time, as liquidated damages and not as a penalty. Any waiver of accrued liquidated damages, in whole or in part, is subject to approval of the City Council or its authorized delegee. (A) Liquidated Damages. Liquidated damages will not be assessed for any Excusable Delay or Compensable Delay, as set forth above. (B) Milestones. Liquidated damages may also be separately assessed for failure to meet milestones specified elsewhere in the Contract Documents. (C) Setoff. City is entitled to deduct the amount of liquidated damages assessed against any payments otherwise due to Contractor, including progress payments, Final Payment, or unreleased retention. If there are insufficient Contract funds remaining to cover the full amount of liquidated damages assessed, City is entitled to recover the balance from Contractor or its performance bond surety. (D) Occupancy or Use. Occupancy or use of the Project in whole or in part prior to Final Completion does not constitute City’s acceptance of the Project and will not operate as a waiver of City’s right to assess liquidated damages for Contractor’s Non-Excusable Delay in achieving Final Completion.
(E) Other Remedies. City’s right to liquidated damages under this Section applies only to damages arising from Contractor’s Non-Excusable Delay or failure to complete the Work within the Contract Time. City retains its right to pursue all other remedies under the Contract for other types of damage, including damage to property or persons, costs or diminution in value from defective materials or workmanship, costs to repair or complete the Work, or other liability caused by Contractor.

Article 6 - Contract Modification

6.1 Contract Modification. Subject to the limited exception set forth in subsection (D) below, any change in the Work or the Contract Documents, including the Contract Price or Contract Time, will not be a valid and binding change to the Contract unless it is formalized in a Change Order, including a “no-cost” Change Order or a unilateral Change Order. Changes in the Work pursuant to this Article 6 will not operate to release, limit, or abridge Contractor’s warranty obligations pursuant to Article 11 or any obligations of Contractor’s bond sureties.
(A) City-Directed Changes. City may direct changes in the scope or sequence of Work or the requirements of the Contract Documents, without invalidating the Contract.

Such changes may include Extra Work as set forth in subsection (C) below, or deletion or modification of portions of the Work. Contractor must promptly comply with City-directed changes in the Work in accordance with the original Contract Documents, even if Contractor and City have not yet reached agreement as to adjustments to the Contract Price or Contract Time for the change in the Work or for the Extra Work. Contractor is not entitled to extra compensation for cost savings resulting from “value engineering” pursuant to Public Contract Code § 7101, except to the extent authorized in advance by City in writing, and subject to any applicable procedural requirements for submitting a proposal for value engineering cost savings.

Page 142 of 950 ends

Parking Garage Security & Safety Enhancements CA 05-21-25 GENERAL CONDITIONS CIP Project No. 337-37262 Page 33
(B) Disputes. In the event of a dispute over entitlement to or the amount of a change in Contract Time or a change in Contract Price related to a City-directed change in the Work, Contractor must perform the Work as directed and may not delay its Work or cease Work pending resolution of the dispute, but must continue to comply with its duty to diligently prosecute the performance and timely completion of the Work, including the Work in dispute. Likewise, in the event that City and Contractor dispute whether a portion or portions of the Work are already required by the Contract Documents or constitute Extra Work, or otherwise dispute the interpretation of any portion(s) of the Contract Documents, Contractor must perform the Work as directed and may not delay its Work or cease Work pending resolution of the dispute, but must continue to comply with its duty to diligently prosecute the performance and timely completion of the Work, including the Work in dispute, as directed by City. If Contractor refuses to perform the Work in dispute, City may, acting in its sole discretion, elect to delete the Work from the Contract and reduce the Contract Price accordingly, and self-perform the Work or direct that the Work be performed by others. Alternatively, City may elect to terminate the Contract for convenience or for cause. Contractor’s sole recourse for an unresolved dispute related to changes in the Work or performance of any Extra Work is to comply with the dispute resolution provisions set forth in Article 12, below.
(C) Extra Work. City may direct Contractor to perform Extra Work related to the Project. Contractor must promptly perform any Extra Work as directed or authorized by City in accordance with the original Contract Documents, even if Contractor and City have not yet reached agreement on adjustments to the Contract Price or Contract Time for such Extra Work. If Contractor believes it is necessary to perform Extra Work due to changed conditions, Contractor must promptly notify the Engineer in writing, specifically identifying the Extra Work and the reason(s) the Contractor believes it is Extra Work. This notification requirement does not constitute a Change Order request pursuant to Section

6.2, below. Contractor must maintain detailed daily records that itemize the cost of each element of Extra Work, and sufficiently distinguish the direct cost of the Extra Work from the cost of other Work performed. For each day that Contractor performs Extra Work, or Work that Contractor contends is Extra Work, Contractor must submit no later than the following Working Day, a daily report of the Extra Work performed that day and the related costs, together with copies of certified payroll, invoices, and other documentation substantiating the costs (“Extra Work Report”). The Engineer will make any adjustments to Contractor’s Extra Work Report(s) based on the Engineer’s records of the Work. When an Extra Work Report(s) is agreed on and signed by both City and Contractor, the Extra Work Report(s) will become the basis for payment under a duly authorized and signed Change Order. Failure to submit the required documentation by close of business on the next Working Day is deemed a full and complete waiver for any change in the Contract Price or Contract Time for any Extra Work performed that day. (D) Minor Changes and RFIs. Minor field changes, including RFI replies from City, that do not affect the Contract Price or Contract Time and that are approved by the Engineer acting within their scope of authority, do not require a Change Order. By executing an RFI reply from City, Contractor agrees that it will perform the Work as clarified therein, with no change to the Contract Price or Contract Time. (E) Remedy for Non-Compliance. Contractor’s failure to promptly comply with a City-directed change is deemed a material breach of the Contract, and in addition to all other remedies available to it, City may, at its sole discretion, hire another contractor or use its own forces to complete the disputed Work at Contractor’s sole expense, and may deduct the cost from the Contract Price.

6.2 Contractor Change Order Requests. Contractor must submit a request or proposal for a change in the Work, compensation for Extra Work, or a change in the Contract Price or Contract Time as a written Change Order request or proposal.

Page 143 of 950 ends

Parking Garage Security & Safety Enhancements CA 05-21-25 GENERAL CONDITIONS CIP Project No. 337-37262 Page 34
(A) Time for Submission. Any request for a change in the Contract Price or the Contract Time must be submitted in writing to the Engineer within ten calendar days of the date that Contractor first encounters the circumstances, information or conditions giving rise to the Change Order request, even if the total amount of the requested change in the Contract Price or impact on the Contract Time is not yet known at that time. If City requests that Contractor propose the terms of a Change Order, unless otherwise specified in City’s request, Contractor must provide the Engineer with a written proposal for the change in the Contract Price or Contract Time within five working days of receiving City’s request, in a form satisfactory to the Engineer. (B) Required Contents. Any Change Order request or proposal submitted by Contractor must include a complete breakdown of actual or estimated costs and credits, and must itemize labor, materials, equipment, taxes, insurance, subcontract amounts, and, if applicable, Extra Work Reports. Any estimated cost must be updated in writing as soon as the actual amount is known.
(C) Required Documentation. All claimed costs must be fully documented, and any related request for an extension of time or delay-related costs must be included at that time and in compliance with the requirements of Article 5 of the General Conditions.

Upon request, Contractor must permit City to inspect its original and unaltered pricing records, subcontract agreements, subcontract change orders, purchase orders, invoices, or receipts associated with the claimed costs.
(D) Required Form. Contractor must use City’s form(s) for submitting all Change Order requests or proposals, unless otherwise specified by City. (E) Certification. All Change Order requests must be signed by Contractor and must include the following certification:
“The undersigned Contractor certifies under penalty of perjury that its statements and representations in this Change Order request are true and correct. Contractor warrants that this Change Order request is comprehensive and complete as to the Work or changes referenced herein, and agrees that any known or foreseeable costs, expenses, or time extension requests not included herein, are deemed waived.”

6.3 Adjustments to Contract Price. The amount of any increase or decrease in the Contract Price will be determined based on one of the following methods listed below, in the order listed with unit pricing taking precedence over the other methods. Markup applies only to City-authorized time and material Work, and does not apply to any other payments to Contractor. For Work items or components that are deleted in their entirety, Contractor will only be entitled to compensation for those direct, actual, and documented costs (including restocking fees), reasonably incurred before Contractor was notified of the City’s intent to delete the Work, with no markup for overhead, profit, or other indirect costs.
(A) Unit Pricing. Amounts previously provided by Contractor in the form of unit prices, either in the Price Schedule or in a post-award schedule of values pursuant to Section 8.1, Schedule of Values, will apply to determine the price for the affected Work, to the extent applicable unit prices have been provided for that type of Work. No additional markup for overhead, profit, or other indirect costs will be added to the calculation.
(B) Lump Sum. A mutually agreed upon, all-inclusive lump sum price for the affected Work with no additional markup for overhead, profit, or other indirect costs.

Page 144 of 950 ends

Parking Garage Security & Safety Enhancements CA 05-21-25 GENERAL CONDITIONS CIP Project No. 337-37262 Page 35
(C) Time and Materials. On a time and materials basis, if and only to the extent compensation on a time and materials basis is expressly authorized by City in advance of Contractor’s performance of the Work and subject to any not-to-exceed limit. Time and materials compensation for increased costs or Extra Work (but not decreased costs or deleted Work), will include allowed markup for overhead, profit, and other indirect costs, calculated as the total of the following sums, the cumulative total of which may not exceed the maximum markup rate of 15%:
(1) All direct labor costs provided by the Contractor, excluding superintendence, project management, or administrative costs, plus 15% markup; (2) All direct material costs provided by the Contractor, including sales tax, plus 15% markup;
(3) All direct plant and equipment rental costs provided by the Contractor, plus 15% markup;
(4) All direct additional subcontract costs plus 10% markup for Work performed by Subcontractors; and
(5) Increased bond or insurance premium costs computed at 1.5% of total of the previous four sums.

6.4 Unilateral Change Order. If the parties dispute the terms of a proposed Change Order, including disputes over the amount of compensation or extension of time that Contractor has requested, the value of deleted or changed Work, what constitutes Extra Work, or quantities used, City may elect to issue a unilateral Change Order, directing performance of the Work, and authorizing a change in the Contract Price or Contract Time for the adjustment to compensation or time that the City believes is merited. Contractor’s sole recourse to dispute the terms of a unilateral Change Order is to submit a timely Claim pursuant to Article 12, below.

6.5 Non-Compliance Deemed Waiver. Contractor waives its entitlement to any increase in the Contract Price or Contract Time if Contractor fails to fully comply with the provisions of this Article. Contractor will not be paid for unauthorized Extra Work.

Article 7 - General Construction Provisions

7.1 Permits, Fees, Business License, and Taxes.
(A) Permits, Fees, and City Business License. Contractor must obtain and pay for all permits, fees, and licenses required to perform the Work, including a City business license. Contractor must cooperate with and provide notifications to all government agencies with jurisdiction over the Project, as may be required. Contractor must provide City with copies of all records of permits and permit applications, payment of required fees, and any licenses required for the Work.
(B) Taxes. Contractor must pay for all taxes on labor, material, and equipment, except Federal Excise Tax to the extent that City is exempt from Federal Excise Tax.

7.2 Temporary Facilities. Contractor must provide, at Contractor’s sole expense, any and all temporary facilities for the Project, including an onsite staging area for materials and equipment, a field office, sanitary facilities, utilities, storage, scaffolds, barricades, walkways, and any other temporary structure required to safely perform the Work along

Page 145 of 950 ends

Parking Garage Security & Safety Enhancements CA 05-21-25 GENERAL CONDITIONS CIP Project No. 337-37262 Page 36
with any incidental utility services. The location of all temporary facilities must be approved by the City prior to installation. Temporary facilities must be safe and adequate for the intended use and installed and maintained in accordance with Laws and the Contract Documents. Contractor must fence and screen the Project site and, if applicable, any separate Worksites, including the staging area, and its operation must minimize inconvenience to neighboring properties. Additional provisions pertaining to temporary facilities may be included in the Specifications or Special Conditions. (A) Utilities. Contractor must install and maintain the power, water, sewer, and all other utilities required for the Project site, including the piping, wiring, internet and wifi connections, and any related equipment necessary to maintain the temporary facilities. (B) Removal and Repair. Contractor must promptly remove all such temporary facilities when they are no longer needed or upon completion of the Work, whichever comes first. Contractor must promptly repair any damage to City’s property or to other property caused by the installation, use, or removal of the temporary facilities, and must promptly restore the property to its original or intended condition.

7.3 Noninterference and Site Management. Contractor must avoid interfering with City’s use of its property at or adjacent to the Project site, including use of roadways, entrances, parking areas, walkways, and structures. Contractor must also minimize disruption of access to private property in the Project vicinity. Contractor must coordinate with affected property owners, tenants, and businesses, and maintain some vehicle and pedestrian access to their residences or properties at all times. Temporary access ramps, fencing or other measures must be provided as needed. Before blocking access to a private driveway or parking lot, Contractor must provide effective notice to the affected parties at least 48 hours in advance of the pending closure and allow them to remove vehicles.

Private driveways, residences and parking lots must have access to a roadway during non-Work hours.
(A) Offsite Acquisition. Unless otherwise provided by City, Contractor must acquire, use, and dispose of, at its sole expense, any Worksites, licenses, easements, and temporary facilities necessary to access and perform the Work. (B) Offsite Staging Area and Field Office. If additional space beyond the Project site is needed, such as for the staging area or the field office, Contractor may need to make arrangements with the nearby property owner(s) to secure the space. Before using or occupying any property owned by a third party, Contractor must provide City with a copy of the necessary license agreement, easement, or other written authorization from the property owner, together with a written release from the property owner holding City harmless from any related liability, in a form acceptable to the City Attorney. (C) Traffic Management. Contractor must provide traffic management and traffic controls as specified in the Contract Documents, as required by Laws, and as otherwise required to ensure public and worker safety, and to avoid interference with public or private operations or the normal flow of vehicular, bicycle, or pedestrian traffic.

7.4 Signs. No signs may be displayed on or about City’s property, except signage which is required by Laws or by the Contract Documents, without City’s prior written approval as to size, design, and location.

7.5 Project Site and Nearby Property Protections.
(A) General. Contractor is responsible at all times, on a 24-hour basis and at its sole cost, for protecting the Work, the Project site, and the materials and equipment to be incorporated into the Work, until the City has accepted the Project, excluding any

Page 146 of 950 ends

Parking Garage Security & Safety Enhancements CA 05-21-25 GENERAL CONDITIONS CIP Project No. 337-37262 Page 37
exceptions to acceptance, if any. Except as specifically authorized by City, Contractor must confine its operations to the area of the Project site indicated in the Plans and Specifications. Contractor is liable for any damage caused by Contractor or its Subcontractors to the Work, City’s property, the property of adjacent or nearby property owners and the work or personal property of other contractors working for City, including damage related to Contractor’s failure to adequately secure the Work or any Worksite. (1) Subject to City’s approval, Contractor will provide and install safeguards to protect the Work; any Worksite, including the Project site; City’s real or personal property and the real or personal property of adjacent or nearby property owners, including plant and tree protections.
(2) City wastewater systems may not be interrupted. If the Work disrupts existing sewer facilities, Contractor must immediately notify City and establish a plan, subject to City’s approval, to convey the sewage in closed conduits back into the sanitary sewer system. Sewage must not be permitted to flow in trenches or be covered by backfill.
(3) Contractor must remove with due care, and store at City’s request, any objects or material from the Project site that City will salvage or reuse at another location.
(4) If directed by Engineer, Contractor must promptly repair or replace any property damage, as specified by the Engineer. However, acting in its sole discretion, City may elect to have the property damage remedied otherwise, and may deduct the cost to repair or replace the damaged property from payment otherwise due to Contractor.
(5) Contractor will not permit any structure or infrastructure to be loaded in a manner that will damage or endanger the integrity of the structure or infrastructure.
(B) Securing Project Site. After completion of Work each day, Contractor must secure the Project site and, to the extent feasible, make the area reasonably accessible to the public unless City approves otherwise. All excess materials and equipment not protected by approved traffic control devices must be relocated to the staging area or demobilized. Trench spoils must be hauled off the Project site daily and open excavations must be protected with steel plates. Contractor and Subcontractor personnel may not occupy or use the Project site for any purpose during non-Work hours, except as may be provided in the Contract Documents or pursuant to prior written authorization from City. (C) Unforeseen Conditions. If Contractor encounters facilities, utilities, or other unknown conditions not shown on or reasonably inferable from the Plans or apparent from inspection of the Project site, Contractor must immediately notify the City and promptly submit a Request for Information to obtain further directions from the Engineer.

Contractor must avoid taking any action which could cause damage to the facilities or utilities pending further direction from the Engineer. The Engineer’s written response will be final and binding on Contractor. If the Engineer’s subsequent direction to Contractor affects Contractor’s cost or time to perform the Work, Contractor may submit a Change Order request as set forth in Article 6 above.
(D) Support; Adjacent Properties. Contractor must provide, install, and maintain all shoring, bracing, and underpinning necessary to provide support to City’s property and adjacent properties and improvements thereon. Contractor must provide notifications to adjacent property owners as may be required by Laws. See also, Section 7.15, Trenching of Five Feet or More.

Page 147 of 950 ends

Parking Garage Security & Safety Enhancements CA 05-21-25 GENERAL CONDITIONS CIP Project No. 337-37262 Page 38
(E) Notification of Property Damage. Contractor must immediately notify the City of damage to any real or personal property resulting from Work on the Project. Contractor must immediately provide a written report to City of any such property damage in excess of $500 (based on estimated cost to repair or replace) within 24 hours of the occurrence.

The written report must include: (1) the location and nature of the damage, and the owner of the property, if known; (2) the name and address of each employee of Contractor or any Subcontractor involved in the damage; (3) a detailed description of the incident, including precise location, time, and names and contact information for known witnesses; and (4) a police or first responder report, if applicable. If Contractor is required to file an accident report with another government agency, Contractor will provide a copy of the report to City.

7.6 Materials and Equipment.
(A) General. Unless otherwise specified, all materials and equipment required for the Work must be new, free from defects, and of the best grade for the intended purpose, and furnished in sufficient quantities to ensure the proper and expeditious performance of the Work. Contractor must employ measures to preserve the specified quality and fitness of the materials and equipment. Unless otherwise specified, all materials and equipment required for the Work are deemed to include all components required for complete installation and intended operation and must be installed in accordance with the manufacturer’s recommendations or instructions. Contractor is responsible for all shipping, handling, and storage costs associated with the materials and equipment required for the Work. Contractor is responsible for providing security and protecting the Work and all of the required materials, supplies, tools and equipment at Contractor’s sole cost until City has formally accepted the Project as set forth in Section 11.1, Final Completion. Contractor will not assign, sell, mortgage, or hypothecate any materials or equipment for the Project, or remove any materials or equipment that have been installed or delivered.
(B) City-Provided. If the Work includes installation of materials or equipment to be provided by City, Contractor is solely responsible for the proper examination, handling, storage, and installation in accordance with the Contract Documents. Contractor must notify City of any defects discovered in City-provided materials or equipment, sufficiently in advance of scheduled use or installation to afford adequate time to procure replacement materials or equipment as needed. Contractor is solely responsible for any loss of or damage to such items which occurs while the items are in Contractor’s custody and control, the cost of which may be offset from the Contract Price and deducted from any payment(s) due to Contractor.
(C) Intellectual Property Rights. Contractor must, at its sole expense, obtain any authorization or license required for use of patented or copyright-protected materials, equipment, devices, or processes that are incorporated into the Work. Contractor’s indemnity obligations in Article 4 apply to any claimed violation of intellectual property rights in violation of this provision.

7.7 Substitutions.
(A) “Or Equal.” Any Specification designating a material, product, or thing (collectively, “item”) or service by specific brand or trade name, followed by the words “or equal,” is intended only to indicate the quality and type of item or service desired, and Contractor may request use of any equal item or service. Unless otherwise stated in the Specifications, any reference to a specific brand or trade name for an item or service that is used solely for the purpose of describing the type of item or service desired, will be deemed to be followed by the words “or equal.” A substitution will only be approved if it is

Page 148 of 950 ends

Parking Garage Security & Safety Enhancements CA 05-21-25 GENERAL CONDITIONS CIP Project No. 337-37262 Page 39
a true “equal” item or service in every aspect of design, function, and quality, as determined by City, including dimensions, weight, maintenance requirements, durability, fit with other elements, and schedule impacts.
(B) Request for Substitution. A post-award request for substitution of an item or service must be submitted in writing to the Engineer for approval in advance, within the applicable time period provided in the Contract Documents. If no time period is specified, the substitution request may be submitted any time within 35 days after the date of award of the Contract, or sufficiently in advance of the time needed to avoid delay of the Work, whichever is earlier.
(C) Substantiation. Any available data substantiating the proposed substitute as an equal item or service must be submitted with the written request for substitution.

Contractor’s failure to timely provide all necessary substantiation, including any required test results as soon as they are available, is grounds for rejection of the proposed substitution, without further review.
(D) Burden of Proving Equality. Contractor has the burden of proving the equality of the proposed substitution at Contractor’s sole cost. City has sole discretion to determine whether a proposed substitution is equal, and City’s determination is final.

(E) Approval or Rejection. If the proposed substitution is approved, Contractor is solely responsible for any additional costs or time associated with the substituted item or service. If the proposed substitution is rejected, Contractor must, without delay, install the item or use the service as specified by City.
(F) Contractor’s Obligations. City’s approval of a proposed substitution will not relieve Contractor from any of its obligations under the Contract Documents. In the event Contractor makes an unauthorized substitution, Contractor will be solely responsible for all resulting cost impacts, including the cost of removal and replacement and the impact to other design elements.

7.8 Testing and Inspection.
(A) General. All materials, equipment, and workmanship used in the Work are subject to inspection and testing by City at all times and at all locations during construction and/or fabrication, including at any Worksite, shops, and yards. All manufacturers’ application or installation instructions must be provided to the Inspector at least ten days prior to the first such application or installation. Contractor must, at all times, make the Work available for testing or inspection. Neither City’s inspection or testing of Work, nor its failure to do so, operate to waive or limit Contractor’s duty to complete the Work in accordance with the Contract Documents. (B) Scheduling and Notification. Contractor must cooperate with City in coordinating the inspections and testing. Contractor must submit samples of materials, at Contractor’s expense, and schedule all tests required by the Contract Documents in time to avoid any delay to the progress of the Work. Contractor must notify the Engineer no later than noon of the Working Day before any inspection or testing and must provide timely notice to the other necessary parties as specified in the Contract Documents. If Contractor schedules an inspection or test beyond regular Work hours, or on a Saturday, Sunday, or recognized City holiday, Contractor must notify the Engineer at least two Working Days in advance for approval. If approved, Contractor must reimburse City for the cost of the overtime inspection or testing. Such costs, including the City’s hourly costs for required personnel, may be deducted from payments otherwise due to Contractor.

Page 149 of 950 ends

Parking Garage Security & Safety Enhancements CA 05-21-25 GENERAL CONDITIONS CIP Project No. 337-37262 Page 40
(C) Responsibility for Costs. City will bear the initial cost of inspection and testing to be performed by independent consultants retained by City, subject to the following exceptions:
(1) Contractor will be responsible for the costs of any subsequent inspections or tests which are required to substantiate compliance with the Contract Documents, and any associated remediation costs.
(2) Contractor will be responsible for inspection costs, at City’s hourly rates, for inspection time lost because the Work is not ready, or Contractor fails to appear for a scheduled inspection.
(3) If any portion of the Work that is subject to inspection or testing is covered or concealed by Contractor prior to the inspection or testing, Contractor will bear the cost of making that portion of the Work available for the inspection or testing required by the Contract Documents, and any associated repair or remediation costs.
(4) Contractor is responsible for properly shoring all compaction test sites deeper than five feet below grade, as required under Section 7.15 below. (5) Any Work or material that is defective or fails to comply with the requirements of the Contract Documents must be promptly repaired, removed, replaced, or corrected by Contractor, at Contractor’s sole expense, even if that Work or material was previously inspected or included in a progress payment. (D) Contractor’s Obligations. Contractor is solely responsible for any delay occasioned by remediation of defective or noncompliant Work or material. Inspection or testing of the Work does not in any way relieve Contractor of its obligations to perform the Work as specified. Any Work done without the inspection(s) or testing required by the Contract Documents will be subject to rejection by City. (E) Distant Locations. If required off-site testing or inspection must be conducted at a location more than 100 miles from the Project site, Contractor is solely responsible for the additional travel costs required for testing and/or inspection at such locations. (F) Final Inspection. The provisions of this Section 7.8 also apply to final inspection under Article 11, Completion and Warranty Provisions.

7.9 Project Site Conditions and Maintenance. Contractor must at all times, on a 24-hour basis and at its sole cost, maintain the Project site and staging and storage areas in clean, neat, and sanitary condition and in compliance with all Laws pertaining to safety, air quality, and dust control. Adequate toilets must be provided, and properly maintained and serviced for all workers on the Project site, located in a suitably secluded area, subject to City’s prior approval. Contractor must also, on a daily basis and at its sole cost, remove and properly dispose of the debris and waste materials from the Project site. (A) Air Emissions Control. Contractor must not discharge smoke or other air contaminants into the atmosphere in violation of any Laws. Contractor must comply with all Laws, including the California Air Resources Board’s In-Use Off-Road Diesel-Fueled Fleets Regulation (13 CCR § 2449 et seq.).
(B) Dust and Debris. Contractor must minimize and confine dust and debris resulting from the Work. Contractor must abate dust nuisance by cleaning, sweeping, and immediately sprinkling with water excavated areas of dirt or other materials prone to cause dust, and within one hour after the Engineer notifies Contractor that an airborne

Page 150 of 950 ends

Parking Garage Security & Safety Enhancements CA 05-21-25 GENERAL CONDITIONS CIP Project No. 337-37262 Page 41
nuisance exists. The Engineer may direct that Contractor provide an approved waterspraying truck for this purpose. If water is used for dust control, Contractor will only use the minimum necessary. Contractor must take all necessary steps to keep waste water out of streets, gutters, or storm drains. See Section 7.19, Environmental Control. If City determines that the dust control is not adequate, City may have the work done by others and deduct the cost from the Contract Price. Contractor will immediately remove any excess excavated material from the Project site and any dirt deposited on public streets. (C) Clean up. Before discontinuing Work in an area, Contractor must clean the area and remove all debris and waste along with the construction equipment, tools, machinery, and surplus materials.
(1) Except as otherwise specified, all excess Project materials, and the materials removed from existing improvements on the Project site with no salvage value or intended reuse by City, will be Contractor’s property.
(2) Hauling trucks and other vehicles leaving the Project site must be cleaned of exterior mud or dirt before traveling on City streets. Materials and loose debris must be delivered and loaded to prevent dropping materials or debris. Contractor must immediately remove spillage from hauling on any publicly traveled way.

Streets affected by Work on the Project must be kept clean by street sweeping. (D) Disposal. Contractor must dispose of all Project debris and waste materials in a safe and legal manner. Contractor may not burn or bury waste materials on the Project site. Contractor will not allow any dirt, refuse, excavated material, surplus concrete or mortar, or any associated washings, to be disposed of onto streets, into manholes or into the storm drain system.
(E) Completion. At the completion of the Work, Contractor must remove from the Project site all of its equipment, tools, surplus materials, waste materials and debris, presenting a clean and neat appearance. Before demobilizing from the Project site, Contractor must ensure that all surfaces are cleaned, sealed, waxed, or finished as applicable, and that all marks, stains, paint splatters, and the like have been properly removed from the completed Work and the surrounding areas. Contractor must ensure that all parts of the construction are properly joined with the previously existing and adjacent improvements and conditions. Contractor must provide all cutting, fitting and patching needed to accomplish that requirement. Contractor must also repair or replace all existing improvements that are damaged or removed during the Work, both on and off the Project site, including curbs, sidewalks, driveways, fences, signs, landscaping, utilities, street surfaces and structures. Repairs and replacements must be at least equal to the previously existing improvements, and the condition, finish and dimensions must match the previously existing improvements. Contractor must restore to original condition all property or items that are not designated for alteration under the Contract Documents and leave each Worksite clean and ready for occupancy or use by City. (F) Non-Compliance. If Contractor fails to comply with its maintenance and cleanup obligations or any City clean up order, City may, acting in its sole discretion, elect to suspend the Work until the condition(s) is corrected with no increase in the Contract Time or Contract Price, or undertake appropriate cleanup measures without further notice and deduct the cost from any amounts due or to become due to Contractor.

7.10 Instructions and Manuals. Contractor must provide to City three copies each of all instructions and manuals required by the Contract Documents, unless otherwise specified. These must be complete as to drawings, details, parts lists, performance data, and other information that may be required for City to easily maintain and service the materials and equipment installed for this Project.

Page 151 of 950 ends

Parking Garage Security & Safety Enhancements CA 05-21-25 GENERAL CONDITIONS CIP Project No. 337-37262 Page 42
(A) Submittal Requirements. All manufacturers’ application or installation instructions must be provided to City at least ten days prior to the first such application.

The instructions and manuals, along with any required guarantees, must be delivered to City for review.
(B) Training. Contractor or its Subcontractors must train City’s personnel in the operation and maintenance of any complex equipment or systems as a condition precedent to Final Completion, if required in the Contract Documents.

7.11 As-built Drawings. Contractor and its Subcontractors must prepare and maintain at the Project site a detailed, complete and accurate as-built set of the Plans which will be used solely for the purpose of recording changes made in any portion of the original Plans in order to create accurate record drawings at the end of the Project. (A) Duty to Update. The as-built drawings must be updated as changes occur, on a daily basis if necessary. City may withhold the estimated cost for City to have the as-built drawings prepared from payments otherwise due to Contractor, until the as-built drawings are brought up to date to the satisfaction of City. Actual locations to scale must be identified on the as-built drawings for all runs of mechanical and electrical work, including all site utilities installed underground, in walls, floors, or otherwise concealed. Deviations from the original Plans must be shown in detail. The exact location of all main runs, whether piping, conduit, ductwork or drain lines, must be shown by dimension and elevation. The location of all buried pipelines, appurtenances, or other improvements must be represented by coordinates and by the horizontal distance from visible aboveground improvements. (B) Final Completion. Contractor must verify that all changes in the Work are depicted in the as-built drawings and must deliver the complete set of as-built drawings to the Engineer for review and acceptance as a condition precedent to Final Completion and Final Payment.

7.12 Existing Utilities.
(A) General. The Work may be performed in developed, urban areas with existing utilities, both above and below ground, including utilities identified in the Contract Documents or in other informational documents or records. Contractor must take due care to locate identified or reasonably identifiable utilities before proceeding with trenching, excavation, or any other activity that could damage or disrupt existing utilities.

This may include excavation with small equipment, potholing, or hand excavation, and, if practical, using white paint or other suitable markings to delineate the area to be excavated. Except as otherwise provided herein, Contractor will be responsible for costs resulting from damage to identified or reasonably identifiable utilities due to Contractor’s negligence or failure to comply with the Contract Documents, including the requirements in this Article 7.
(B) Unidentified Utilities. Pursuant to Government Code § 4215, if, during the performance of the Work, Contractor discovers utility facilities not identified by City in the Contract Documents, Contractor must immediately provide written notice to City and the utility. City assumes responsibility for the timely removal, relocation, or protection of existing main or trunkline utility facilities located on the Project site if those utilities are not identified in the Contract Documents. Contractor will be compensated in accordance with the provisions of the Contract Documents for the costs of locating, repairing damage not due to Contractor’s failure to exercise reasonable care, and removing or relocating utility facilities not indicated in the Plans or Specifications with reasonable accuracy, and for equipment on the Project necessarily idled during such work. Contractor will not be

Page 152 of 950 ends

Parking Garage Security & Safety Enhancements CA 05-21-25 GENERAL CONDITIONS CIP Project No. 337-37262 Page 43
assessed liquidated damages for delay in completion of the Work, to the extent the delay was caused by City’s failure to provide for removal or relocation of the utility facilities.

7.13 Notice of Excavation. Contractor must comply with all applicable requirements in Government Code § 4216 et seq., which are incorporated by reference herein.

7.14 Trenching and Excavations of Four Feet or More. As required by Public Contract Code § 7104, if the Work includes digging trenches or other excavations that extend deeper than four feet below the surface, the provisions in this Section apply to the Work and the Project.
(A) Duty to Notify. Contractor must promptly, and before the following conditions are disturbed, provide written notice to City if Contractor finds any of the following conditions:
(1) Material that Contractor believes may be a hazardous waste, as defined in § 25117 of the Health and Safety Code, that is required to be removed to a Class I, Class II, or Class III disposal site in accordance with the provisions of existing Laws;
(2) Subsurface or latent physical conditions at the Project site differing from those indicated by information about the Project site made available to bidders prior to the deadline for submitting bids; or
(3) Unknown physical conditions at the Project site of any unusual nature, materially different from those ordinarily encountered and generally recognized as inherent in work of the character required by the Contract Documents. (B) City Investigation. City will promptly investigate the conditions and if City finds that the conditions materially differ from those indicated, apparent, or reasonably inferred from information about the Project site made available to bidders, or involve hazardous waste, and cause a decrease or increase in Contractor’s cost of, or the time required for, performance of any part of the Work, City will issue a Change Order. (C) Disputes. In the event that a dispute arises between City and Contractor regarding any of the conditions specified in subsection (B) above, or the terms of a Change Order issued by City, Contractor will not be excused from completing the Work within the Contract Time, but must proceed with all Work to be performed under the Contract. Contractor will retain any and all rights provided either by the Contract or by Laws which pertain to the resolution of disputes between Contractor and City.

7.15 Trenching of Five Feet or More. As required by Labor Code § 6705, if the Contract Price exceeds $25,000 and the Work includes the excavation of any trench or trenches of five feet or more in depth, a detailed plan must be submitted to City for acceptance in advance of the excavation. The detailed plan must show the design of shoring, bracing, sloping, or other provisions to be made for worker protection from the hazard of caving ground during the excavation. If the plan varies from the shoring system standards, it must be prepared by a California registered civil or structural engineer. Use of a shoring, sloping, or protective system less effective than that required by the Construction Safety Orders is prohibited.

7.16 New Utility Connections. Except as otherwise specified, City will pay connection charges and meter costs for new permanent utilities required by the Contract Documents, if any. Contractor must notify City sufficiently in advance of the time needed to request

Page 153 of 950 ends

Parking Garage Security & Safety Enhancements CA 05-21-25 GENERAL CONDITIONS CIP Project No. 337-37262 Page 44
service from each utility provider so that connections and services are initiated in accordance with the Project schedule.

7.17 Lines and Grades. Contractor is required to use any benchmark provided by the Engineer. Unless otherwise specified in the Contract Documents, Contractor must provide all lines and grades required to execute the Work. Contractor must also provide, preserve, and replace if necessary, all construction stakes required for the Project. All stakes or marks must be set by a California licensed surveyor or a California registered civil engineer. Contractor must notify the Engineer of any discrepancies found between Contractor’s staking and grading and information provided by the Contract Documents.

Upon completion, all Work must conform to the lines, elevations, and grades shown in the Plans, including any changes directed by a Change Order.

7.18 Historic or Archeological Items.
(A) Contractor’s Obligations. Contractor must ensure that all persons performing Work at the Project site are required to immediately notify the Project Manager, upon discovery of any potential historic or archeological items, including historic or prehistoric ruins, a burial ground, archaeological or vertebrate paleontological site, including fossilized footprints or other archeological, paleontological or historical feature on the Project site (collectively, “Historic or Archeological Items”). (B) Discovery; Cessation of Work. Upon discovery of any potential Historic or Archeological Items, Work must be stopped within an 85-foot radius of the find and may not resume until authorized in writing by City. If required by City, Contractor must assist in protecting or recovering the Historic or Archeological Items, with any such assistance to be compensated as Extra Work on a time and materials basis under Article 6, Contract Modification. At City’s discretion, a suspension of Work required due to discovery of Historic or Archeological Items may be treated as Excusable Delay pursuant to Article 5, or as a suspension for convenience under Article 13.

7.19 Environmental Control. Contractor must not pollute any drainage course or its tributary inlets with fuels, oils, bitumens, acids, insecticides, herbicides or other harmful materials.

Contractor must prevent the release of any hazardous material or hazardous waste into the soil or groundwater, and prevent the unlawful discharge of pollutants into City’s storm drain system and watercourses as required below. Contractor and its Subcontractors must at all times in the performance of the Work comply with all Laws concerning pollution of waterways.
(A) Stormwater Permit. Contractor must comply with all applicable conditions of the State Water Resources Control Board National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System General Permit for Waste Discharge Requirements for Discharges of Stormwater Runoff Associated with Construction Activity (“Stormwater Permit”). (B) Contractor’s Obligations. If required for the Work, a copy of the Stormwater Permit is on file in City’s principal administrative offices, and Contractor must comply with it without adjustment of the Contract Price or the Contract Time. Contractor must timely and completely submit required reports and monitoring information required by the conditions of the Stormwater Permit. Contractor also must comply with all other Laws governing discharge of stormwater, including applicable municipal stormwater management programs.

7.20 Noise Control. Contractor must comply with all applicable noise control Laws. Noise control requirements apply to all equipment used for the Work or related to the Work, including trucks, transit mixers or transient equipment that may or may not be owned by Contractor.

Page 154 of 950 ends

Parking Garage Security & Safety Enhancements CA 05-21-25 GENERAL CONDITIONS CIP Project No. 337-37262 Page 45

7.21 Mined Materials. Pursuant to the Surface Mining and Reclamation Act of 1975, Public Resources Code § 2710 et seq., any purchase of mined materials, such as construction aggregate, sand, gravel, crushed stone, road base, fill materials, and any other mineral materials must originate from a surface mining operation included on the AB 3098 List, which may be accessed online at: https://www.conservation.ca.gov/smgb/Pages/AB3098-List.aspx.

Article 8 - Payment

8.1 Schedule of Values. Prior to submitting its first application for payment, Contractor must prepare and submit to the Project Manager a schedule of values apportioned to the various divisions and phases of the Work, including mobilization and demobilization. If a Bid Schedule was submitted with Contractor’s bid, the amounts in the schedule of values must be consistent with the Bid Schedule. Each line item contained in the schedule of values must be assigned a value such that the total of all items equals the Contract Price.

The items must be sufficiently detailed to enable accurate evaluation of the percentage of completion claimed in each application for payment, and the assigned value consistent with any itemized or unit pricing submitted with Contractor’s bid. (A) Measurements for Unit Price Work. Materials and items of Work to be paid for on the basis of unit pricing will be measured according to the methods specified in the Contract Documents.
(B) Deleted or Reduced Work. Contractor will not be compensated for Work that City has deleted or reduced in scope, except for any labor, material, or equipment costs for such Work that Contractor reasonably incurred before Contractor learned that the Work could be deleted or reduced. Contractor will only be compensated for those actual, direct and documented costs incurred, and will not be entitled to any mark up for overhead or lost profits.

8.2 Progress Payments. Following the last day of each month, or as otherwise required by the Special Conditions or Specifications, Contractor will submit to the Project Manager a monthly application for payment for Work performed during the preceding month based on the estimated value of the Work performed during that preceding month. (A) Application for Payment. Each application for payment must be itemized to include labor, materials, and equipment incorporated into the Work, and materials and equipment delivered to the Project site, as well as authorized and approved Change Orders. Each payment application must be supported by the unit prices submitted with Contractor’s Bid Schedule and/or schedule of values and any other substantiating data required by the Contract Documents.
(B) Payment of Undisputed Amounts. City will pay the undisputed amount due within 30 days after Contractor has submitted a complete and accurate payment application, subject to Public Contract Code § 20104.50. City will deduct a percentage from each progress payment as retention, as set forth in Section 8.5, below, and may deduct or withhold additional amounts as set forth in Section 8.3, below.

8.3 Adjustment of Payment Application. City may adjust or reject the amount requested in a payment application, including application for Final Payment, in whole or in part, if the amount requested is disputed or unsubstantiated. Contractor will be notified in writing of the basis for the modification to the amount requested. City may also deduct or withhold from payment otherwise due based upon any of the circumstances and amounts listed

Page 155 of 950 ends

Parking Garage Security & Safety Enhancements CA 05-21-25 GENERAL CONDITIONS CIP Project No. 337-37262 Page 46
below. Sums withheld from payment otherwise due will be released when the basis for that withholding has been remedied and no longer exists. (A) For Contractor’s unexcused failure to perform the Work as required by the Contract Documents, including correction or completion of punch list items, City may withhold or deduct an amount based on the City’s estimated cost to correct or complete the Work.
(B) For loss or damage caused by Contractor or its Subcontractors arising out of or relating to performance of the Work or any failure to protect the Project site, City may deduct an amount based on the estimated cost to repair or replace. (C) For Contractor’s failure to pay its Subcontractors and suppliers when payment is due, City may withhold an amount equal to the total of past due payments and may opt to pay that amount separately via joint check pursuant to Section 8.6(B), Joint Checks. (D) For Contractor’s failure to timely correct rejected, nonconforming, or defective Work, City may withhold or deduct an amount based on the City’s estimated cost to correct or complete the Work.
(E) For any unreleased stop notice, City may withhold 125% of the amount claimed. (F) For Contractor’s failure to submit any required schedule or schedule update in the manner specified or within the time specified in the Contract Documents, City may withhold an amount equal to five percent of the total amount requested until Contractor complies with its schedule submittal obligations.
(G) For Contractor’s failure to maintain or submit as-built documents in the manner specified or within the time specified in the Contract Documents, City may withhold or deduct an amount based on the City’s cost to prepare the as-builts. (H) For Work performed without Shop Drawings that have been accepted by City, when accepted Shop Drawings are required before proceeding with the Work, City may deduct an amount based on the estimated cost to correct unsatisfactory Work or diminution in value.
(I) For fines, payments, or penalties assessed under the Labor Code, City may deduct from payments due to Contractor as required by Laws and as directed by the Division of Labor Standards Enforcement.
(J) For any other costs or charges that may be withheld or deducted from payments to Contractor, as provided in the Contract Documents, including liquidated damages, City may withhold or deduct such amounts from payment otherwise due to Contractor.

8.4 Early Occupancy. Neither City’s payment of progress payments nor its partial or full use or occupancy of the Project constitutes acceptance of any part of the Work.

8.5 Retention. City will retain five percent of the full amount due on each progress payment (i.e., the amount due before any withholding or deductions pursuant to Section 8.3, Adjustment of Payment Application), or the percentage stated in the Notice Inviting Bids, whichever is greater, as retention to ensure full and satisfactory performance of the Work.

Contractor is not entitled to any reduction in the rate of withholding at any time, nor to release of any retention before 35 days following City’s acceptance of the Project. (A) Substitution of Securities. As provided by Public Contract Code § 22300, Contractor may request in writing that it be allowed, at its sole expense, to substitute

Page 156 of 950 ends

Parking Garage Security & Safety Enhancements CA 05-21-25 GENERAL CONDITIONS CIP Project No. 337-37262 Page 47
securities for the retention withheld by City. Any escrow agreement entered into pursuant to this provision must fully comply with Public Contract Code § 22300 and will be subject to approval as to form by City’s legal counsel. If City exercises its right to draw upon such securities in the event of default pursuant to section (7) of the statutory Escrow Agreement for Security Deposits in Lieu of Retention, pursuant to subdivision (g) of Public Contract Code § 22300 (“Escrow Agreement”), and if Contractor disputes that it is in default, its sole remedy is to comply with the dispute resolution procedures in Article 12 and the provisions therein. It is agreed that for purposes of this paragraph, an event of default includes City’s rights pursuant to these Contract Documents to withhold or deduct sums from retention, including withholding or deduction for liquidated damages, incomplete or defective Work, stop payment notices, or backcharges. It is further agreed that if any individual authorized to give or receive written notice on behalf of a party pursuant to section (10) of the Escrow Agreement are unavailable to give or receive notice on behalf of that party due to separation from employment, retirement, death, or other circumstances, the successor or delegee of the named individual is deemed to be the individual authorized to give or receive notice pursuant to section (10) of the Escrow Agreement.
(B) Release of Undisputed Retention. All undisputed retention, less any amounts that may be assessed as liquidated damages, retained for stop notices, or otherwise withheld pursuant to Section 8.3, Adjustment of Payment Application, will be released as Final Payment to Contractor no sooner than 35 days following recordation of the notice of completion, and no later than 60 days following acceptance of the Project by City’s governing body or authorized designee pursuant to Section 11.1(C), Acceptance, or, if the Project has not been accepted, no later than 60 days after the Project is otherwise considered complete pursuant to Public Contract Code § 7107(c).

8.6 Payment to Subcontractors and Suppliers. Each month, Contractor must promptly pay each Subcontractor and supplier the value of the portion of labor, materials, and equipment incorporated into the Work or delivered to the Project site by the Subcontractor or supplier during the preceding month. Such payments must be made in accordance with the requirements of Laws pertaining to such payments, and those of the Contract Documents and applicable subcontract or supplier contract. (A) Withholding for Stop Notice. Pursuant to Civil Code § 9358, City will withhold 125% of the amount claimed by an unreleased stop notice, a portion of which may be retained by City for the costs incurred in handling the stop notice claim, including attorneys’ fees and costs, as authorized by law.
(B) Joint Checks. City reserves the right, acting in its sole discretion, to issue joint checks made payable to Contractor and a Subcontractor or supplier, if City determines this is necessary to ensure fair and timely payment for a Subcontractor or supplier who has provided services or goods for the Project. As a condition to release of payment by a joint check, the joint check payees may be required to execute a joint check agreement in a form provided or approved by the City Attorney’s Office. The joint check payees will be jointly and severally responsible for the allocation and disbursement of funds paid by joint check. Payment by joint check will not be construed to create a contractual relationship between City and a Subcontractor or supplier of any tier beyond the scope of the joint check agreement.

8.7 Final Payment. Contractor’s application for Final Payment must comply with the requirements for submitting an application for a progress payment as stated in Section

8.2, above. Corrections to previous progress payments, including adjustments to estimated quantities for unit priced items, may be included in the Final Payment. If Contractor fails to submit a timely application for Final Payment, City reserves the right to unilaterally process and issue Final Payment without an application from Contractor in

Page 157 of 950 ends

Parking Garage Security & Safety Enhancements CA 05-21-25 GENERAL CONDITIONS CIP Project No. 337-37262 Page 48
order to close out the Project. For the purposes of determining the deadline for Claim submission pursuant to Article 12, the date of Final Payment is deemed to be the date that City acts to release undisputed retention as final payment to Contractor, or otherwise provides written notice to Contractor of Final Payment or that no undisputed funds remain available for Final Payment due to offsetting withholdings or deductions pursuant to Section 8.3, Adjustment of Payment Application. If the amount due from Contractor to City exceeds the amount of Final Payment, City retains the right to recover the balance from Contractor or its sureties.

8.8 Release of Claims. City may, at any time, require that payment of the undisputed portion of any progress payment or Final Payment be contingent upon Contractor furnishing City with a written waiver and release of all claims against City arising from or related to the portion of Work covered by those undisputed amounts subject to the limitations of Public Contract Code § 7100. Any disputed amounts may be specifically excluded from the release.

8.9 Warranty of Title. Contractor warrants that title to all work, materials, or equipment incorporated into the Work and included in a request for payment will pass over to City free of any claims, liens, or encumbrances upon payment to Contractor.

Article 9 - Labor Provisions

9.1 Discrimination Prohibited. Discrimination against any prospective or present employee engaged in the Work on grounds of race, color, ancestry, national origin, ethnicity, religion, sex, sexual orientation, age, disability, or marital status is strictly prohibited.

Contractor and its Subcontractors are required to comply with all applicable Laws prohibiting discrimination, including the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (Govt. Code § 12900 et seq.), Government Code § 11135, and Labor Code §§ 1735, 1777.5, 1777.6, and 3077.5.

9.2 Labor Code Requirements.
(A) Eight Hour Day. Pursuant to Labor Code § 1810, eight hours of labor constitute a legal day’s work under this Contract.
(B) Penalty. Pursuant to Labor Code § 1813, Contractor will forfeit to City as a penalty, the sum of $25.00 for each day during which a worker employed by Contractor or any Subcontractor is required or permitted to work more than eight hours in any one calendar day or more than 40 hours per calendar week, except if such workers are paid overtime under Labor Code § 1815.
(C) Apprentices. Contractor is responsible for compliance with the requirements governing employment and payment of apprentices, as set forth in Labor Code § 1777.5, which is fully incorporated by reference.
(D) Notices. Pursuant to Labor Code § 1771.4, Contractor is required to post all job site notices prescribed by Laws.

9.3 Prevailing Wages. Each worker performing Work under this Contract that is covered under Labor Code §§ 1720, 1720.3, or 1720.9, including cleanup at the Project site, must be paid at a rate not less than the prevailing wage as defined in §§ 1771 and 1774 of the Labor Code. The prevailing wage rates are on file with the City and available online at http://www.dir.ca.gov/dlsr. Contractor must post a copy of the applicable prevailing rates at the Project site.

Page 158 of 950 ends

Parking Garage Security & Safety Enhancements CA 05-21-25 GENERAL CONDITIONS CIP Project No. 337-37262 Page 49
(A) Penalties. Pursuant to Labor Code § 1775, Contractor and any Subcontractor will forfeit to City as a penalty up to $200.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each worker paid less than the applicable prevailing wage rate. Contractor must also pay each worker the difference between the applicable prevailing wage rate and the amount actually paid to that worker.
(B) Federal Requirements. If this Project is subject to federal prevailing wage requirements in addition to California prevailing wage requirements, Contractor and its Subcontractors are required to pay the higher of the currently applicable state or federal prevailing wage rates.

9.4 Payroll Records. Contractor must comply with the provisions of Labor Code §§ 1771.4, 1776, and 1812 and all implementing regulations, which are fully incorporated by this reference, including requirements for monthly electronic submission of payroll records to the DIR.
(A) Contractor and Subcontractor Obligations. Contractor and each Subcontractor must keep accurate payroll records, showing the name, address, social security number, work classification, straight time and overtime hours worked each day and week, and the actual per diem wages paid to each journeyman, apprentice, worker, or other employee employed in connection with the Work. Each payroll record must contain or be verified by a written declaration that it is made under penalty of perjury, stating both of the following:
(1) The information contained in the payroll record is true and correct; and (2) Contractor or the Subcontractor has complied with the requirements of Labor Code §§ 1771, 1811, and 1815 for any Work performed by its employees on the Project.
(B) Certified Record. A certified copy of an employee’s payroll record must be made available for inspection or furnished to the employee or their authorized representative on request, to City, to the Division of Labor Standards Enforcement, to the Division of Apprenticeship Standards of the DIR, and as further required by the Labor Code.
(C) Enforcement. Upon notice of noncompliance with Labor Code § 1776, Contractor or Subcontractor has ten days in which to comply with the requirements of this section. If Contractor or Subcontractor fails to do so within the ten-day period, Contractor or Subcontractor will forfeit a penalty of $100.00 per day, or portion thereof, for each worker for whom compliance is required, until strict compliance is achieved. Upon request by the Division of Apprenticeship Standards, or the Division of Labor Standards Enforcement, these penalties will be withheld from payments then due to Contractor.

9.5 Labor Compliance. Pursuant to Labor Code § 1771.4, the Contract for this Project is subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the DIR.

Article 10 - Safety Provisions

10.1 Safety Precautions and Programs. Contractor and its Subcontractors are fully responsible for safety precautions and programs, and for the safety of persons and property in the performance of the Work. Contractor and its Subcontractors must at all times comply with all applicable health and safety Laws and seek to avoid injury, loss, or damage to persons or property by taking reasonable steps to protect its employees and

Page 159 of 950 ends

Parking Garage Security & Safety Enhancements CA 05-21-25 GENERAL CONDITIONS CIP Project No. 337-37262 Page 50
other persons at any Worksite, materials and equipment stored on or off site, and property at or adjacent to any Worksite.
(A) Reporting Requirements. Contractor must immediately notify the City of any death, serious injury or illness resulting from Work on the Project. Contractor must immediately provide a written report to City of each recordable accident or injury occurring at any Worksite within 24 hours of the occurrence. The written report must include: (1) the name and address of the injured or deceased person; (2) the name and address of each employee of Contractor or of any Subcontractor involved in the incident; (3) a detailed description of the incident, including precise location, time, and names and contact information for known witnesses; and (4) a police or first responder report, if applicable. If Contractor is required to file an accident report with a government agency, Contractor will provide a copy of the report to City.
(B) Legal Compliance. Contractor’s safety program must comply with the applicable legal and regulatory requirements. Contractor must provide City with copies of all notices required by Laws.
(C) Contractor’s Obligations. Any damage or loss caused by Contractor arising from the Work which is not insured under property insurance must be promptly remedied by Contractor.
(D) Remedies. If City determines, in its sole discretion, that any part of the Work or Project site is unsafe, City may, without assuming responsibility for Contractor’s safety program, require Contractor or its Subcontractor to cease performance of the Work or to take corrective measures to City’s satisfaction. If Contractor fails to promptly take the required corrective measures, City may perform them and deduct the cost from the Contract Price. Contractor agrees it is not entitled to submit a Claim for damages, for an increase in Contract Price, or for a change in Contract Time based on Contractor’s compliance with City’s request for corrective measures pursuant to this provision.

10.2 Hazardous Materials. Unless otherwise specified in the Contract Documents, this Contract does not include the removal, handling, or disturbance of any asbestos or other Hazardous Materials. If Contractor encounters materials on the Project site that Contractor reasonably believes to be asbestos or other Hazardous Materials, and the asbestos or other Hazardous Materials have not been rendered harmless, Contractor may continue Work in unaffected areas reasonably believed to be safe, but must immediately cease work on the area affected and report the condition to City. No asbestos, asbestos-containing products or other Hazardous Materials may be used in performance of the Work.

10.3 Material Safety. Contractor is solely responsible for complying with § 5194 of Title 8 of the California Code of Regulations, including by providing information to Contractor’s employees about any hazardous chemicals to which they may be exposed in the course of the Work. A hazard communication program and other forms of warning and training about such exposure must be used. Contractor must also maintain Safety Data Sheets (“SDS”) at the Project site, as required by Laws, for materials or substances used or consumed in the performance of the Work. The SDS will be accessible and available to Contractor’s employees, Subcontractors, and City.
(A) Contractor Obligations. Contractor is solely responsible for the proper delivery, handling, use, storage, removal, and disposal of all materials brought to the Project site and/or used in the performance of the Work. Contractor must notify the Engineer if a specified product or material cannot be used safely.

Page 160 of 950 ends

Parking Garage Security & Safety Enhancements CA 05-21-25 GENERAL CONDITIONS CIP Project No. 337-37262 Page 51
(B) Labeling. Contractor must ensure proper labeling on any material brought onto the Project site so that any persons working with or in the vicinity of the material may be informed as to the identity of the material, any potential hazards, and requirements for proper handling, protections, and disposal.

10.4 Hazardous Condition. Contractor is solely responsible for determining whether a hazardous condition exists or is created during the course of the Work, involving a risk of bodily harm to any person or risk of damage to any property. If a hazardous condition exists or is created, Contractor must take all precautions necessary to address the condition and ensure that the Work progresses safely under the circumstances.

Hazardous conditions may result from, but are not limited to, use of specified materials or equipment, the Work location, the Project site condition, the method of construction, or the way any Work must be performed.

10.5 Emergencies. In an emergency affecting the safety or protection of persons, Work, or property at or adjacent to any Worksite, Contractor must take reasonable and prompt actions to prevent damage, injury, or loss, without prior authorization from the City if, under the circumstances, there is inadequate time to seek prior authorization from the City.

Article 11 - Completion and Warranty Provisions

11.1 Final Completion.
(A) Final Inspection and Punch List. When the Work required by this Contract is fully performed, Contractor must provide written notification to City requesting final inspection. The Engineer will schedule the date and time for final inspection, which must include Contractor’s primary representative for this Project and its superintendent. Based on that inspection, City will prepare a punch list of any items that are incomplete, missing, defective, incorrectly installed, or otherwise not compliant with the Contract Documents.

The punch list to Contractor will specify the time by which all of the punch list items must be completed or corrected. The punch list may include City’s estimated cost to complete each punch list item if Contractor fails to do so within the specified time. The omission of any non-compliant item from a punch list will not relieve Contractor from fulfilling all requirements of the Contract Documents. Contractor’s failure to complete any punch list item within the time specified in the punch list will not waive or abridge its warranty obligations for any such items that must be completed by the City or by a third party retained by the City due to Contractor’s failure to timely complete any such outstanding item.
(B) Requirements for Final Completion. Final Completion will be achieved upon completion or correction of all punch list items, as verified by City’s further inspection, and upon satisfaction of all other Contract requirements, including any commissioning required under the Contract Documents and submission of all final submittals, including instructions and manuals as required under Section 7.10, and complete, final as-built drawings as required under Section 7.11, all to City’s satisfaction. (C) Acceptance. The Project will be considered accepted upon City Council action during a public meeting to accept the Project, unless the Engineer is authorized to accept the Project, in which case the Project will be considered accepted upon the date of the Engineer’s issuance of a written notice of acceptance. In order to avoid delay of Project close out, the City may elect, acting in its sole discretion, to accept the Project as complete subject to exceptions for punch list items that are not completed within the time specified in the punch list.

Page 161 of 950 ends

Parking Garage Security & Safety Enhancements CA 05-21-25 GENERAL CONDITIONS CIP Project No. 337-37262 Page 52
(D) Final Payment and Release of Retention. Final Payment and release of retention, less any sums withheld pursuant to the provisions of the Contract Documents, will not be made sooner than 35 days after recordation of the notice of completion. If Contractor fails to complete all of the punch list items within the specified time, City may withhold up to 150% of City’s estimated cost to complete each of the remaining items from Final Payment and may use the withheld retention to pay for the costs to selfperform the outstanding items or to retain a third party to complete any such outstanding punch list item.

11.2 Warranty.
(A) General. Contractor warrants that all materials and equipment will be new unless otherwise specified, of good quality, in conformance with the Contract Documents, and free from defective workmanship and materials. Contractor further warrants that the Work will be free from material defects not intrinsic in the design or materials required in the Contract Documents. Contractor warrants that materials or items incorporated into the Work comply with the requirements and standards in the Contract Documents, including compliance with Laws, and that any Hazardous Materials encountered or used were handled as required by Laws. At City’s request, Contractor must furnish satisfactory evidence of the quality and type of materials and equipment furnished. Contractor’s warranty does not extend to damage caused by normal wear and tear, or improper use or maintenance.
(B) Warranty Period. Contractor’s warranty must guarantee its Work for a period of one year from the date of Project acceptance (the “Warranty Period”), except when a longer guarantee is provided by a supplier or manufacturer or is required by the Specifications or Special Conditions. Contractor must obtain from its Subcontractors, suppliers and manufacturers any special or extended warranties required by the Contract Documents.
(C) Warranty Documents. As a condition precedent to Final Completion, Contractor must supply City with all warranty and guarantee documents relevant to equipment and materials incorporated into the Work and guaranteed by their suppliers or manufacturers.
(D) Subcontractors. The warranty obligations in the Contract Documents apply to Work performed by Contractor and its Subcontractors, and Contractor agrees to be coguarantor of such Work. (E) Contractor’s Obligations. Upon written notice from City to Contractor of any defect in the Work discovered during the Warranty Period, Contractor or its responsible Subcontractor must promptly correct the defective Work at its own cost. Contractor’s obligation to correct defects discovered during the Warranty Period will continue past the expiration of the Warranty Period as to any defects in Work for which Contractor was notified prior to expiration of the Warranty Period. Work performed during the Warranty Period (“Warranty Work”) will be subject to the warranty provisions in this Section 11.2 for a one-year period that begins upon completion of such Warranty Work to City’s satisfaction.
(F) City’s Remedies. If Contractor or its responsible Subcontractor fails to correct defective Work within ten days following notice by City, or sooner if required by the circumstances, City may correct the defects to conform with the Contract Documents at Contractor’s sole expense. Contractor must reimburse City for its costs in accordance with subsection (H), below.

Page 162 of 950 ends

Parking Garage Security & Safety Enhancements CA 05-21-25 GENERAL CONDITIONS CIP Project No. 337-37262 Page 53
(G) Emergency Repairs. In cases of emergency where any delay in correcting defective Work could cause harm, loss or damage, City may immediately correct the defects to conform with the Contract Documents at Contractor’s sole expense. Contractor or its surety must reimburse City for its costs in accordance with subsection (H), below. (H) Reimbursement. Contractor must reimburse City for its costs to repair under subsections (F) or (G), above, within 30 days following City’s submission of a demand for payment pursuant to this provision. If City is required to initiate legal action to compel Contractor’s compliance with this provision, and City is the prevailing party in such action, Contractor and its surety are solely responsible for all of City’s attorney’s fees and legal costs expended to enforce Contractor’s warranty obligations herein, in addition to any and all costs City incurs to correct the defective Work.

11.3 Use Prior to Final Completion. City reserves the right to occupy or make use of the Project, or any portions of the Project, prior to Final Completion if City has determined that the Project or portion of it is in a condition suitable for the proposed occupation or use, and that it is in its best interest to occupy or make use of the Project, or any portions of it, prior to Final Completion.
(A) Non-Waiver. Occupation or use of the Project, in whole or in part, prior to Final Completion will not operate as acceptance of the Work or any portion of it, nor will it operate as a waiver of any of City’s rights or Contractor’s duties pursuant to these Contract Documents, and will not affect nor bear on the determination of the time of substantial completion with respect to any statute of repose pertaining to the time for filing an action for construction defect.
(B) City’s Responsibility. City will be responsible for the cost of maintenance and repairs due to normal wear and tear with respect to those portions of the Project that are being occupied or used before Final Completion. The Contract Price or the Contract Time may be adjusted pursuant to the applicable provisions of these Contract Documents if, and only to the extent that, any occupation or use under this Section actually adds to Contractor’s cost or time to complete the Work within the Contract Time.

11.4 Substantial Completion. For purposes of determining “substantial completion” with respect to any statute of repose pertaining to the time for filing an action for construction defect, “substantial completion” is deemed to mean the last date that Contractor or any Subcontractor performs Work on the Project prior to City acceptance of the Project, except for warranty work performed under this Article.

Article 12 - Dispute Resolution

12.1 Claims. This Article applies to and provides the exclusive procedures for any Claim arising from or related to the Contract or performance of the Work. (A) Definition. “Claim” means a separate demand by Contractor, submitted in writing by registered or certified mail with return receipt requested, for a change in the Contract Time, including a time extension or relief from liquidated damages, or a change in the Contract Price, when the demand has previously been submitted to City in accordance with the requirements of the Contract Documents, and which has been rejected or disputed by City, in whole or in part. A Claim may also include that portion of a unilateral Change Order that is disputed by the Contractor. (B) Limitations. A Claim may only include the portion of a previously rejected demand that remains in dispute between Contractor and City. With the exception of any dispute regarding the amount of money actually paid to Contractor as Final Payment,

Page 163 of 950 ends

Parking Garage Security & Safety Enhancements CA 05-21-25 GENERAL CONDITIONS CIP Project No. 337-37262 Page 54
Contractor is not entitled to submit a Claim demanding a change in the Contract Time or the Contract Price, which has not previously been submitted to City in full compliance with Article 5 and Article 6, and subsequently rejected in whole or in part by City. (C) Scope of Article. This Article is intended to provide the exclusive procedures for submission and resolution of Claims of any amount and applies in addition to the provisions of Public Contract Code § 9204 and § 20104 et seq., which are incorporated by reference herein.
(D) No Work Delay. Notwithstanding the submission of a Claim or any other dispute between the parties related to the Project or the Contract Documents, Contractor must perform the Work and may not delay or cease Work pending resolution of a Claim or other dispute, but must continue to diligently prosecute the performance and timely completion of the Work, including the Work pertaining to the Claim or other dispute. (E) Informal Resolution. Contractor will make a good faith effort to informally resolve a dispute before initiating a Claim, preferably by face-to-face meeting between authorized representatives of Contractor and City.

12.2 Claims Submission. The following requirements apply to any Claim subject to this Article:
(A) Substantiation. The Claim must be submitted to City in writing, clearly identified as a “Claim” submitted pursuant to this Article 12 and must include all of the documents necessary to substantiate the Claim including the Change Order request that was rejected in whole or in part, and a copy of City’s written rejection that is in dispute.

The Claim must clearly identify and describe the dispute, including relevant references to applicable portions of the Contract Documents, and a chronology of relevant events. Any Claim for additional payment must include a complete, itemized breakdown of all known or estimated labor, materials, taxes, insurance, and subcontract, or other costs.

Substantiating documentation such as payroll records, receipts, invoices, or the like, must be submitted in support of each component of claimed cost. Any Claim for an extension of time or delay costs must be substantiated with a schedule analysis and narrative depicting and explaining claimed time impacts.
(B) Claim Format and Content. A Claim must be submitted in the following format:
(1) Provide a cover letter, specifically identifying the submission as a “Claim” submitted under this Article 12 and specifying the requested remedy (e.g., amount of proposed change to Contract Price and/or change to Contract Time). (2) Provide a summary of each Claim, including underlying facts and the basis for entitlement, and identify each specific demand at issue, including the specific Change Order request (by number and submittal date), and the date of City's rejection of that demand, in whole or in part.
(3) Provide a detailed explanation of each issue in dispute. For multiple issues included within a single Claim or for multiple Claims submitted concurrently, separately number and identify each individual issue or Claim, and include the following for each separate issue or Claim:
a. A succinct statement of the matter in dispute, including Contractor’s position and the basis for that position;
b. Identify and attach all documents that substantiate the Claim, including relevant provisions of the Contract Documents, RFIs,

Page 164 of 950 ends

Parking Garage Security & Safety Enhancements CA 05-21-25 GENERAL CONDITIONS CIP Project No. 337-37262 Page 55
calculations, and schedule analysis (see subsection (A), Substantiation, above);
c. A chronology of relevant events; and
d. Analysis and basis for claimed changes to Contract Price, Contract Time, or any other remedy requested.
(4) Provide a summary of issues and corresponding claimed damages. If, by the time of the Claim submission deadline (below), the precise amount of the requested change in the Contract Price or Contract Time is not yet known, Contractor must provide a good faith estimate, including the basis for that estimate, and must identify the date by which it is anticipated that the Claim will be updated to provide final amounts.
(5) Include the following certification, executed by Contractor’s authorized representative:
“The undersigned Contractor certifies under penalty of perjury that its statements and representations in this Claim submittal are true and correct. Contractor warrants that this Claim submittal is comprehensive and complete as to the matters in dispute, and agrees that any costs, expenses, or delay not included herein are deemed waived.”
(C) Submission Deadlines.
(1) A Claim disputing rejection of a request for a change in the Contract Time or Contract Price must be submitted within 15 days following the date that City notified Contractor in writing that a request for a change in the Contract Time or Contract Price, duly submitted in compliance with Article 5 and Article 6, has been rejected in whole or in part. A Claim disputing the terms of a unilateral Change Order must be submitted within 15 days following the date of issuance of the unilateral Change Order. These Claim deadlines apply even if Contractor cannot yet quantify the total amount of any requested change in the Contract Time or Contract Price. If the Contractor cannot quantify those amounts, it must submit an estimate of the amounts claimed pending final determination of the requested remedy by Contractor.
(2) With the exception of any dispute regarding the amount of Final Payment, any Claim must be filed on or before the date of Final Payment or will be deemed waived.
(3) A Claim disputing the amount of Final Payment must be submitted within 15 days of the effective date of Final Payment, under Section 8.7, Final Payment. (4) Strict compliance with these Claim submission deadlines is necessary to ensure that any dispute may be mitigated as soon as possible, and to facilitate cost-efficient administration of the Project. Any Claim that is not submitted within the specified deadlines will be deemed waived by Contractor.

12.3 City’s Response. City will respond within 45 days of receipt of the Claim with a written statement identifying which portion(s) of the Claim are disputed, unless the 45-day period is extended by mutual agreement of City and Contractor or as otherwise allowed under Public Contract Code § 9204. However, if City determines that the Claim is not adequately substantiated pursuant to Section 12.2(A), Substantiation, City may first request in writing, within 30 days of receipt of the Claim, any additional documentation

Page 165 of 950 ends

Parking Garage Security & Safety Enhancements CA 05-21-25 GENERAL CONDITIONS CIP Project No. 337-37262 Page 56
supporting the Claim or relating to defenses to the Claim that City may have against the Claim.
(A) Additional Information. If additional information is thereafter required, it may be requested and provided upon mutual agreement of City and Contractor. If Contractor’s Claim is based on estimated amounts, Contractor has a continuing duty to update its Claim as soon as possible with information on actual amounts in order to facilitate prompt and fair resolution of the Claim.
(B) Non-Waiver. Any failure by City to respond within the times specified above will not be construed as acceptance of the Claim, in whole or in part, or as a waiver of any provision of these Contract Documents.

12.4 Meet and Confer. If Contractor disputes City’s written response, or City fails to respond within the specified time, within 15 days of receipt of City’s response or within 15 days of City’s failure to respond within the applicable 45-day time period under Section 12.3, respectively, Contractor may notify City of the dispute in writing sent by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, and demand an informal conference to meet and confer for settlement of the issues in dispute. If Contractor fails to notify City of the dispute and demand an informal conference to meet and confer in writing within the specified time, Contractor’s Claim will be deemed waived. (A) Schedule Meet and Confer. Upon receipt of the demand to meet and confer, City will schedule the meet and confer conference to be held within 30 days, or later if needed to ensure the mutual availability of each of the individuals that each party requires to represent its interests at the meet and confer conference. (B) Location for Meet and Confer. The meet and confer conference will be scheduled at a location at or near City’s principal office. (C) Written Statement After Meet and Confer. Within ten working days after the meet and confer has concluded, City will issue a written statement identifying which portion(s) of the Claim remain in dispute, if any.
(D) Submission to Mediation. If the Claim or any portion remains in dispute following the meet and confer conference, within ten working days after the City issues the written statement identifying any portion(s) of the Claim remaining in dispute, the Contractor may identify in writing disputed portion(s) of the Claim, which will be submitted for mediation, as set forth below.

12.5 Mediation and Government Code Claims.
(A) Mediation. Within ten working days after the City issues the written statement identifying any portion(s) of the Claim remaining in dispute following the meet and confer, City and Contractor will mutually agree to a mediator, as provided under Public Contract Code § 9204. Mediation will be scheduled to ensure the mutual availability of the selected mediator and all of the individuals that each party requires to represent its interests. If there are multiple Claims in dispute, the parties may agree to schedule the mediation to address all outstanding Claims at the same time. The parties will share the costs of the mediator and mediation fees equally, but each party is otherwise solely and separately responsible for its own costs to prepare for and participate in the mediation, including costs for its legal counsel or any other consultants.

Page 166 of 950 ends

Parking Garage Security & Safety Enhancements CA 05-21-25 GENERAL CONDITIONS CIP Project No. 337-37262 Page 57
(B) Government Code Claims.
(1) Timely presentation of a Government Code Claim is a condition precedent to filing any legal action based on or arising from the Contract. Compliance with the Claim submission requirements in this Article 12 is a condition precedent to filing a Government Code Claim.
(2) The time for filing a Government Code Claim will be tolled from the time Contractor submits its written Claim pursuant to Section 12.2, above, until the time that Claim is denied in whole or in part at the conclusion of the meet and confer process, including any period of time used by the meet and confer process. However, if the Claim is submitted to mediation, the time for filing a Government Code Claim will be tolled until conclusion of the mediation, including any continuations, if the Claim is not fully resolved by mutual agreement of the parties during the mediation or any continuation of the mediation.

12.6 Tort Claims. This Article does not apply to tort claims and nothing in this Article is intended nor will be construed to change the time periods for filing tort-based Government Code Claims.

12.7 Arbitration. It is expressly agreed, under Code of Civil Procedure § 1296, that in any arbitration to resolve a dispute relating to this Contract, the arbitrator’s award must be supported by law and substantial evidence.

12.8 Burden of Proof and Limitations. Contractor bears the burden of proving entitlement to and the amount of any claimed damages. Contractor is not entitled to damages calculated on a total cost basis, but must prove actual damages. Contractor is not entitled to speculative, special, or consequential damages, including home office overhead or any form of overhead not directly incurred at the Project site or any other Worksite; lost profits; loss of productivity; lost opportunity to work on other projects; diminished bonding capacity; increased cost of financing for the Project; extended capital costs; nonavailability of labor, material or equipment due to delays; or any other indirect loss arising from the Contract. The Eichleay Formula or similar formula will not be used for any recovery under the Contract. The City will not be directly liable to any Subcontractor or supplier.

12.9 Legal Proceedings. In any legal proceeding that involves enforcement of any requirements of the Contract Documents, the finder of fact will receive detailed instructions on the meaning and operation of the Contract Documents, including conditions, limitations of liability, remedies, claim procedures, and other provisions bearing on the defenses and theories of liability. Detailed findings of fact will be requested to verify enforcement of the Contract Documents. All of the City’s remedies under the Contract Documents will be construed as cumulative, and not exclusive, and the City reserves all rights to all remedies available under law or equity as to any dispute arising from or relating to the Contract Documents or performance of the Work.

12.10 Other Disputes. The procedures in this Article 12 will apply to any and all disputes or legal actions, in addition to Claims, arising from or related to this Contract, including disputes regarding suspension or early termination of the Contract, unless and only to the extent that compliance with a procedural requirement is expressly and specifically waived by City. Nothing in this Article is intended to delay suspension or termination under Article

13.

Page 167 of 950 ends

Parking Garage Security & Safety Enhancements CA 05-21-25 GENERAL CONDITIONS CIP Project No. 337-37262 Page 58
Article 13 - Suspension and Termination

13.1 Suspension for Cause. In addition to all other remedies available to City, if Contractor fails to perform or correct Work in accordance with the Contract Documents, including non-compliance with applicable environmental or health and safety Laws, City may immediately order the Work, or any portion of it, suspended until the circumstances giving rise to the suspension have been eliminated to City’s satisfaction. (A) Notice of Suspension. Upon receipt of City’s written notice to suspend the Work, in whole or in part, except as otherwise specified in the notice of suspension, Contractor and its Subcontractors must promptly stop Work as specified in the notice of suspension; comply with directions for cleaning and securing the Worksite; and protect the completed and in-progress Work and materials. Contractor is solely responsible for any damages or loss resulting from its failure to adequately secure and protect the Project.
(B) Resumption of Work. Upon receipt of the City’s written notice to resume the suspended Work, in whole or in part, except as otherwise specified in the notice to resume, Contractor and its Subcontractors must promptly re-mobilize and resume the Work as specified; and within ten days from the date of the notice to resume, Contractor must submit a recovery schedule, prepared in accordance with the Contract Documents, showing how Contractor will complete the Work within the Contract Time. (C) Failure to Comply. Contractor will not be entitled to an increase in the Contract Time or Contract Price for a suspension occasioned by Contractor’s failure to comply with the Contract Documents.
(D) No Duty to Suspend. City’s right to suspend the Work will not give rise to a duty to suspend the Work, and City’s failure to suspend the Work will not constitute a defense to Contractor’s failure to comply with the requirements of the Contract Documents.

13.2 Suspension for Convenience. City reserves the right to suspend, delay, or interrupt the performance of the Work in whole or in part, for a period of time determined to be appropriate for City’s convenience. Upon notice by City pursuant to this provision, Contractor must immediately suspend, delay, or interrupt the Work and secure the Project site as directed by City except for taking measures to protect completed or inprogress Work as directed in the suspension notice, and subject to the provisions of Section 13.1(A) and (B), above. If Contractor submits a timely request for a Change Order in compliance with Articles 5 and 6, the Contract Price and the Contract Time will be equitably adjusted by Change Order pursuant to the terms of Articles 5 and 6 to reflect the cost and delay impact occasioned by such suspension for convenience, except to the extent that any such impacts were caused by Contractor’s failure to comply with the Contract Documents or the terms of the suspension notice or notice to resume. However, the Contract Time will only be extended if the suspension causes or will cause unavoidable delay in Final Completion. If Contractor disputes the terms of a Change Order issued for such equitable adjustment due to suspension for convenience, its sole recourse is to comply with the Claim procedures in Article 12.

13.3 Termination for Default. City may declare that Contractor is in default of the Contract for a material breach of or inability to fully, promptly, or satisfactorily perform its obligations under the Contract.
(A) Default. Events giving rise to a declaration of default include Contractor’s refusal or failure to supply sufficient skilled workers, proper materials, or equipment to perform the Work within the Contract Time; Contractor’s refusal or failure to make prompt payment to its employees, Subcontractors, or suppliers or to correct defective Work or

Page 168 of 950 ends

Parking Garage Security & Safety Enhancements CA 05-21-25 GENERAL CONDITIONS CIP Project No. 337-37262 Page 59
damage; Contractor’s failure to comply with Laws, or orders of any public agency with jurisdiction over the Project; evidence of Contractor’s bankruptcy, insolvency, or lack of financial capacity to complete the Work as required within the Contract Time; suspension, revocation, or expiration and nonrenewal of Contractor’s license or DIR registration; dissolution, liquidation, reorganization, or other major change in Contractor’s organization, ownership, structure, or existence as a business entity; unauthorized assignment of Contractor’s rights or duties under the Contract; or any material breach of the Contract requirements.
(B) Notice of Default and Opportunity to Cure. Upon City’s declaration that Contractor is in default due to a material breach of the Contract Documents, if City determines that the default is curable, City will afford Contractor the opportunity to cure the default within ten days of City’s notice of default, or within a period of time reasonably necessary for such cure, including a shorter period of time if applicable. (C) Termination. If Contractor fails to cure the default or fails to expediently take steps reasonably calculated to cure the default within the time period specified in the notice of default, City may issue written notice to Contractor and its performance bond surety of City’s termination of the Contract for default. (D) Waiver. Time being of the essence in the performance of the Work, if Contractor’s surety fails to arrange for completion of the Work in accordance with the Performance Bond within seven calendar days from the date of the notice of termination pursuant to paragraph (C), City may immediately make arrangements for the completion of the Work through use of its own forces, by hiring a replacement contractor, or by any other means that City determines advisable under the circumstances. Contractor and its surety will be jointly and severally liable for any additional cost incurred by City to complete the Work following termination, where “additional cost” means all cost in excess of the cost City would have incurred if Contractor had timely completed Work without the default and termination. In addition, City will have the right to immediate possession and use of any materials, supplies, and equipment procured for the Project and located at the Project site or any Worksite on City property for the purposes of completing the remaining Work.
(E) Compensation. Within 30 days of receipt of updated as-builts, all warranties, manuals, instructions, or other required documents for Work installed to date, and delivery to City of all equipment and materials for the Project for which Contractor has already been compensated, Contractor will be compensated for the Work satisfactorily performed in compliance with the Contract Documents up to the effective date of the termination pursuant to the terms of Article 8, Payment, subject to City’s rights to withhold or deduct sums from payment otherwise due pursuant to Section 8.3, and excluding any costs Contractor incurs as a result of the termination, including any cancellation or restocking charges or fees due to third parties. If Contractor disputes the amount of compensation determined by City, its sole recourse is to comply with the Claim Procedures in Article 12, by submitting a Claim no later than 30 days following notice from City of the total compensation to be paid by City. (F) Wrongful Termination. If Contractor disputes the termination, its sole recourse is to comply with the Claim procedures in Article 12. If a court of competent jurisdiction or an arbitrator later determines that the termination for default was wrongful, the termination will be deemed to be a termination for convenience, and Contractor’s damages will be strictly limited to the compensation provided for termination for convenience under Section 13.4, below. Contractor waives any claim for any other damages for wrongful termination including special or consequential damages, lost opportunity costs, or lost profits, and any award of damages is subject to Section 12.8, Burden of Proof and Limitations.

Page 169 of 950 ends

Parking Garage Security & Safety Enhancements CA 05-21-25 GENERAL CONDITIONS CIP Project No. 337-37262 Page 60

13.4 Termination for Convenience. City reserves the right, acting in its sole discretion, to terminate all or part of the Contract for convenience upon written notice to Contractor. (A) Compensation to Contractor. In the event of City’s termination for convenience, Contractor waives any claim for damages, including for loss of anticipated profits from the Project. The following will constitute full and fair compensation to Contractor, and Contractor will not be entitled to any additional claim or compensation:
(1) Completed Work. The value of its Work satisfactorily performed as of the date notice of termination is received, based on Contractor’s schedule of values and unpaid costs for items delivered to the Project site that were fabricated for incorporation in the Work;
(2) Demobilization. Demobilization costs specified in the schedule of values, or if demobilization costs were not provided in a schedule of values pursuant to Section 8.1, then based on actual, reasonable, and fully documented demobilization costs; and
(3) Termination Markup. Five percent of the total value of the Work performed as of the date of notice of termination, including reasonable, actual, and documented costs to comply with the direction in the notice of termination for convenience, and demobilization costs, which is deemed to cover all overhead and profit to date.
(B) Disputes. If Contractor disputes the amount of compensation determined by City pursuant to paragraph (A), above, its sole recourse is to comply with the Claim procedures in Article 12, by submitting a Claim no later than 30 days following notice from City of total compensation to be paid by City.

13.5 Actions Upon Termination for Default or Convenience. The following provisions apply to any termination under this Article, whether for default or convenience, and whether in whole or in part.
(A) General. Upon termination, City may immediately enter upon and take possession of the Project and the Work and all tools, equipment, appliances, materials, and supplies procured or fabricated for the Project. Contractor will transfer title to and deliver all completed Work and all Work in progress to City. (B) Submittals. Unless otherwise specified in the notice of termination, Contractor must immediately submit to City all designs, drawings, as-built drawings, Project records, contracts with vendors and Subcontractors, manufacturer warranties, manuals, and other such submittals or Work-related documents required under the terms of the Contract Documents, including incomplete documents or drafts.
(C) Close Out Requirements. Except as otherwise specified in the notice of termination, Contractor must comply with all of the following:
(1) Immediately stop the Work, except for any Work that must be completed pursuant to the notice of termination and comply with City’s instructions for cessation of labor and securing the Project and any other Worksite(s). (2) Comply with City’s instructions to protect the completed Work and materials, using best efforts to minimize further costs.

Page 170 of 950 ends

Parking Garage Security & Safety Enhancements CA 05-21-25 GENERAL CONDITIONS CIP Project No. 337-37262 Page 61
(3) Contractor must not place further orders or enter into new subcontracts for materials, equipment, services or facilities, except as may be necessary to complete any portion of the Work that is not terminated. (4) As directed in the notice, Contractor must assign to City or cancel existing subcontracts that relate to performance of the terminated Work, subject to any prior rights, if any, of the surety for Contractor’s performance bond, and settle all outstanding liabilities and claims, subject to City’s approval. (5) As directed in the notice, Contractor must use its best efforts to sell any materials, supplies, or equipment intended solely for the terminated Work in a manner and at market rate prices acceptable to City.
(D) Payment Upon Termination. Upon completion of all termination obligations, as specified herein and in the notice of termination, Contractor will submit its request for Final Payment, including any amounts due following termination pursuant to this Article

13. Payment will be made in accordance with the provisions of Article 8, based on the portion of the Work satisfactorily completed, including the close out requirements, and consistent with the previously submitted schedule of values and unit pricing, including demobilization costs. Adjustments to Final Payment may include deductions for the cost of materials, supplies, or equipment retained by Contractor; payments received for sale of any such materials, supplies, or equipment, less re-stocking fees charged; and as otherwise specified in Section 8.3, Adjustment of Payment Application. (E) Continuing Obligations. Regardless of any Contract termination, Contractor’s obligations for portions of the Work already performed will continue and the provisions of the Contract Documents will remain in effect as to any claim, indemnity obligation, warranties, guarantees, submittals of as-built drawings, instructions, or manuals, record maintenance, or other such rights and obligations arising prior to the termination date.

Article 14 - Miscellaneous Provisions

14.1 Assignment of Unfair Business Practice Claims. Under Public Contract Code § 7103.5, Contractor and its Subcontractors agree to assign to City all rights, title, and interest in and to all causes of action it may have under section 4 of the Clayton Act (15 U.S.C. § 15) or under the Cartwright Act (Chapter 2 (commencing with § 16700) of Part 2 of Division 7 of the Business and Professions Code), arising from purchases of goods, services, or materials pursuant to the Contract or any subcontract. This assignment will be effective at the time City tenders Final Payment to Contractor, without further acknowledgement by the parties.

14.2 Provisions Deemed Inserted. Every provision of law required to be inserted in the Contract Documents is deemed to be inserted, and the Contract Documents will be construed and enforced as though such provision has been included. If it is discovered that through mistake or otherwise that any required provision was not inserted, or not correctly inserted, the Contract Documents will be deemed amended accordingly.

14.3 Waiver. City’s waiver of a breach, failure of any condition, or any right or remedy contained in or granted by the provisions of the Contract Documents will not be effective unless it is in writing and signed by City. City’s waiver of any breach, failure, right, or remedy will not be deemed a waiver of any other breach, failure, right, or remedy, whether or not similar, nor will any waiver constitute a continuing waiver unless specified in writing by City.

Page 171 of 950 ends

Parking Garage Security & Safety Enhancements CA 05-21-25 GENERAL CONDITIONS CIP Project No. 337-37262 Page 62

14.4 Titles, Headings, and Groupings. The titles and headings used and the groupings of provisions in the Contract Documents are for convenience only and may not be used in the construction or interpretation of the Contract Documents or relied upon for any other purpose.

14.5 Statutory and Regulatory References. With respect to any amendments to any statutes or regulations referenced in these Contract Documents, the reference is deemed to be the version in effect on the date that bids were due.

14.6 Survival. The provisions that survive termination or expiration of this Contract include Contract Section 11, Notice, and subsections 12.1, 12.2, 12.3, 12.4, 12.5, and 12.6 of Section 12, General Provisions; and the following provisions in these General Conditions:

Section 2.2(J), Contractor’s Records, Section 2.3(C), Termination, Section 3.7, Ownership, Section 4.2, Indemnity, Article 12, Dispute Resolution, and Section 11.2, Warranty.

END OF GENERAL CONDITIONS

Page 172 of 950 ends

Parking Garage Security & Safety Enhancements CA 05-21-25 SPECIAL CONDITIONS CIP Project No. 337-37262 Page 63
Special Conditions

1. Authorized Work Days and Hours.

1.1 Authorized Work Days. Except as expressly authorized in writing by City, Contractor is limited to performing Work on the Project on the following days of the week, excluding holidays observed by City: Monday through Friday.

1.2 Authorized Work Hours. Except as expressly authorized in writing by City, Contractor is limited to performing Work on the Project during the following hours: 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.

2. Pre-Construction Conference. City will designate a date and time for a preconstruction conference with Contractor following Contract execution. Project administration procedures and coordination between City and Contractor will be discussed, and Contractor must present City with the following information or documents at the meeting for City’s review and acceptance before the Work commences:

2.1 Name, 24-hour contact information, and qualifications of the proposed on-site superintendent;

2.2 List of all key Project personnel and their complete contact information, including email addresses and telephone numbers during regular hours and after hours;

2.3 Staging plans that identify the sequence of the Work, including any phases and alternative sequences or phases, with the goal of minimizing the impacts on residents, businesses and other operations in the Project vicinity;

2.4 Draft baseline schedule for the Work as required under Section 5.2 of the General Conditions, to be finalized within ten days after City issues the Notice to Proceed;

2.5 Schedule with list of Project submittals that require City review, and list of the proposed material suppliers;

2.6 Videotape and photographs recording the conditions throughout the preconstruction Project site, showing the existing improvements and current condition of the curbs, gutters, sidewalks, signs, landscaping, streetlights, structures near the Project such as building faces, canopies, shades and fences, and any other features within the Project area limits;

3. Insurance Requirements. The insurance requirements under Section 4.3 of the General Conditions are modified for this Contract, as set forth below. Except as expressly stated below, all other provisions in Section 4.3 are unchanged and remain in full force and effect.

3.1 Commercial General Liability (“CGL”) Insurance. The CGL insurance policy limits set forth in subsection 4.3(A)(1) of the General Conditions are modified for this Contract to require at least $1,000,000 per occurrence and at least $2,000,000 general aggregate.

3.2 Pollution Liability Insurance Waived. The pollution liability insurance policy requirement set forth in subsection 4.3(A)(4) of the General Conditions is hereby waived and does not apply to this Contract.

Page 173 of 950 ends

Parking Garage Security & Safety Enhancements CA 05-21-25 SPECIAL CONDITIONS CIP Project No. 337-37262 Page 64

3.3 Builders Risk Insurance Waived. The builder’s risk insurance policy requirement set forth in subsection 4.3(A)(5) of the General Conditions is hereby waived and does not apply to this Contract.

END OF SPECIAL CONDITION

Page 174 of 950 ends

113
City of Brentwood 2023/24 – 2027/28 Capital Improvement Program Project Title: Project #:

Parking Garage Security and Safety Enhancements 337-37262 Description/Justification:

This project is included in the City’s Strategic Plan for FY 2022/23 - FY 2023/24. This project will install a vehicle gate and provide security enhancements to the City Hall parking structure.

Project Status:

The design and construction phases are anticipated for FY 2023/24.

Supplemental Information:

An increase in crime, vandalism, and property damage at the parking garage has led to the necessity to limit access to it. This project will limit vehicular access to the structure during off hours and times when the structure is not needed for downtown or community events. The future annual O & M costs will be for power consumption, IS services, facility maintenance and other potential maintenance expenses that may be encountered.

PROJECT EXPENDITURES Prior 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27 2027/28 TOTAL 90040 Planning and Design 30,000 $ 30,000
90050 Construction 390,000 $ 390,000
90070 Project Administration 30,000 $ 30,000
TOTAL $ 450,000 $ 450,000
PROJECT FUNDING Prior 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27 2027/28 TOTAL 47100 General Fund 450,000 $ 450,000
TOTAL 450,000 $ $ 450,000

PROJECT FINANCING CURRENT PROPOSED

Project Category: Community Facilities Improvements
Location: City Hall Parking Garage
Project Manager: A. Baquilar
Project Priority: 1E - Mandatory
Est. Completion Date: 2023/24
Future Annual
O & M Impact: $10,000
Public Art
Requirement: Exempt
General Plan Policy: CSF 3-5

Page 175 of 950 ends

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO. E.10
05/27/2025
SUBJECT: A Resolution adopting a List of Projects for submittal to the California Transportation Commission for Fiscal Year 2025/26 funded by SB 1: The Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 DEPARTMENT: Engineering Department
STAFF: Allen Baquilar, Director of Engineering/City Engineer Vatsal Patel, Engineering Manager
Brant Wilson, Senior Associate Engineer

TITLE/RECOMMENDATION
Adopt a Resolution adopting a List of Projects for submittal to the California Transportation Commission (“Commission”) for Fiscal Year (“FY”) 2025/26 funded by Senate Bill 1: The Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017.

FISCAL IMPACT
This action does not have any fiscal impact at this time. It is a requirement to maintain the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (“RMRA”) funding source for the City of Brentwood (“City”).

The RMRA Fund and the General Fund are the funding sources for the Pavement Management Program – 2026 Capital Improvement Program (“CIP”) Project.

BACKGROUND
In 2017, the Governor signed Senate Bill 1 (“SB 1”), known as the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017. To address basic road maintenance, SB 1 increased per gallon fuel excise taxes, diesel fuel sales taxes, and vehicle registration fees.

Beginning in November of 2017, the State Controller deposited portions of this new funding into the newly created RMRA. A percentage of this funding is apportioned by formula to eligible cities and counties pursuant to the Streets and Highways Code for basic road maintenance, rehabilitation, and critical safety projects on the local streets and roads system.

To receive an apportionment of RMRA funds from the State Controller, the City must annually submit to the Commission a list of projects proposed to be funded with RMRA funds. This list requires approval by the City Council and all proposed projects listed must be included in the City’s budget adopted by the City Council.

Page 176 of 950 ends

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO. E.10
05/27/2025
The City is expecting to fund projects with an estimated $1,900,000 from the RMRA Fund in FY 2025/26.

At this time, upon City Council approval, the following project will be included in the list submitted to the Commission for RMRA Projects:

Pavement Management Program – 2026 (“Project”):
 Crack seal and slurry seal various locations depending on current needs;  Grind and overlay: Central Boulevard from Minnesota Avenue to Fairview Drive; Balfour Road from Brentwood Boulevard to Walnut Boulevard; Anderson Lane from Lone Tree Way to Ascot Place; and Pondlilly Lane; and  Repair of asphalt/manholes at various locations.

It is anticipated that this Project will begin construction in June of 2026 and be completed in August of 2026. It will be funded in part with RMRA funds. The various treatments have an estimated useful life of 7 to 15 years.

As the purpose of this list is to maintain the City’s eligibility process, it does not limit the ability to update it at any time. As uses for the RMRA funds are determined, this list can be modified to better meet the City’s needs.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC INITIATIVE
Not Applicable.

PREVIOUS ACTION
Previous Action by the City Council is included on Attachment 1.

DATE OF NOTICE
Not Applicable.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
Not Applicable.

Page 177 of 950 ends

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO. E.10
05/27/2025

ALTERNATIVE OPTION(S)

1. Do not approve staff’s recommendation.

2. Continue item with direction for staff to return with additional information.

ATTACHMENT(S)

1. Previous Action

2. Resolution

Page 178 of 950 ends

PREVIOUS ACTION
Previous actions related to this agenda item that were taken by the Council are listed below. To view prior actions and materials, and Brentwood Municipal Code references in the staff report, as applicable:
 Visit www.brentwoodca.gov/meetings, and select the meeting date(s) desired to see the reference materials and videos.
 Visit www.brentwoodca.gov/municipalcode to research references to the Brentwood Municipal Code and search by the code section(s) cited.

On August 8, 2017, by Resolution No. 2017-113, the City Council approved the Project List for submittal to the Commission for the FY 2017/18 Program.

On April 24, 2018, by Resolution No. 2018-36, the City Council approved the Project List for submittal to the Commission for the FY 2018/19 Program.

On March 12, 2019, by Resolution No. 2019-23, the City Council approved the Project List for submittal to the Commission for the FY 2019/20 Program.

On April 23, 2019, by Resolution No. 2019-48, the City Council approved the revised Project List for submittal to the Commission for the FY 2019/20 Program and repealed Resolution No. 2019-23.

On March 10, 2020, by Resolution No. 2020-35, the City Council approved the Project List for submittal to the Commission for the FY 2020/21 Program.

On March 23, 2021, by Resolution No. 2021-28, the City Council approved the Project List for submittal to the Commission for the FY 2021/22 Program.

On May 25, 2021, by Resolution No. 2021-52, the City Council approved and adopted the revised Project List for submittal to the Commission for the FY 2021/22 Local Streets and Roads Funding Program; and repealed Resolution No. 2021-28.

On June 14, 2022, by Resolution No. 2022-74, the City Council approved and adopted a List of Projects for submittal to the Commission for FY 2022/23 funded by SB 1:

The Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017.

On June 13, 2023, by Resolution No. 2023-72, the City Council approved and adopted a List of Projects for submittal to the Commission for FY 2023/24 funded by SB 1:

The Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017.

On June 11, 2024, by Resolution No. 2024-58, the City Council approved and adopted a List of Projects for submittal to the Commission for FY 2024/25 funded by SB 1:

The Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017.

Page 179 of 950 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 2025-XX

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

BRENTWOOD ADOPTING A LIST OF PROJECTS FOR SUBMITTAL

TO THE CALIFORNIA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION FOR
FISCAL YEAR 2025/26 FUNDED BY SB 1: THE ROAD REPAIR AND ACCOUNTABILITY ACT OF 2017
WHEREAS, Senate Bill 1 (“SB 1”), the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 (Chapter 5, Statutes of 2017) was passed by the Legislature and signed into law by the Governor in April 2017 to address the significant multi-modal transportation funding shortfalls statewide; and
WHEREAS, SB 1 includes accountability and transparency provisions to ensure the residents of Brentwood are aware of the projects proposed for funding in our community, and which projects have been completed each fiscal year; and WHEREAS, the City of Brentwood (“City”) must adopt by resolution a list of projects proposed to receive fiscal year funding from the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (“RMRA”), created by SB 1, which must include a description and the location of each proposed project, a proposed schedule for the project’s completion, and the estimated useful life of the improvement; and WHEREAS, the City will receive an estimated $1,900,000 in RMRA funding in Fiscal Year 2025/26 from SB 1; and
WHEREAS, this is the ninth year in which the City is receiving SB 1 funding and will enable the City to continue essential road maintenance and rehabilitation projects, safety improvements, repairing and replacing aging bridges, and increasing access and mobility options for the traveling public that would not have otherwise been possible without SB 1; and
WHEREAS, the City used a Pavement Management System to develop the SB 1 project list to ensure revenues are being used on the most high-priority and costeffective projects that also meet the communities’ priorities for transportation investment; and
WHEREAS, the funding from SB 1 will help the City maintain and rehabilitate various streets throughout the City this year; and
WHEREAS, the 2023 California Statewide Local Streets and Roads Needs Assessment found that the City’s streets and roads are in “good” condition and this revenue will help increase the overall quality of the road system and over the next decade will retain City streets and roads in “good” condition; and WHEREAS, the SB 1 project list and overall investment in the City’s local streets and roads infrastructure with a focus on basic maintenance and safety,

Page 180 of 950 ends
Page 2 of 2 ends

investing in complete streets infrastructure, and using cutting-edge technology, materials and practices, will have significant positive co-benefits statewide.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Brentwood does hereby resolve as follows:

1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct.

2. The following newly proposed project will be funded in-part or solely with fiscal year 2025/26 Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account revenues:

Pavement Management Program – 2026:
 Crack seal and slurry seal various locations depending on current needs;
 Grind and overlay: Central Boulevard from Minnesota Avenue to Fairview Drive; Balfour Road from Brentwood Boulevard to Walnut Boulevard; Anderson Lane from Lone Tree Way to Ascot Place; and Pondlilly Lane;
 Repair of asphalt/manholes at various locations;
 It is anticipated that this project will begin in June of 2026 and be completed in August of 2026;
 It will be funded in part with RMRA funds; and
 The various treatments have an estimated useful life of 7 to 15 years.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Brentwood at a regular meeting held on the 27th day of May 2025 by the following vote:

Page 181 of 950 ends

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO. E.11
05/27/2025
SUBJECT: Considering actions pertaining to the annexation of the Orchard Grove North project into the City’s existing Landscape and lighting Assessment District No. 23-1 as Annexation No. 1 DEPARTMENT: Parks and Recreation
STAFF: Vatsal Patel, Interim Parks and Recreation Director Aaron Wanden, Park Maintenance Manager

TITLE/RECOMMENDATION
City Staff recommends the City Council adopt a Resolution initiating and declaring the intention to annex the Orchard Grove North project into existing Landscape and Lighting Assessment District No. 23-1 (Orchard Grove) as Annexation No. 1; declaring the intention to levy and collect assessments; and setting the date of June 10, 2025, at 7:00 p.m. or at such time thereafter that the matter can be heard for the public hearing in accordance with the provisions of the Streets and Highways Code “Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972” and California Proposition 218.

FISCAL IMPACT
Upon annexation into existing Landscape and Lighting Assessment District No. 23-1, the City will have authorization to collect the maximum annual assessment revenue of $56,057 (in FY 2025/26 dollars) from the residential parcels associated with the Orchard Grove North project. This maximum annual assessment revenue will be increased each fiscal year based upon the prior year’s change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners Consumer Price Index and will fund the special benefit portion of the anticipated maintenance, operation, servicing, replacement, and administration expenses associated with public improvements that benefit the Orchard Grove North project. The annual general benefit portion of these costs of approximately $2,080 will be funded by the General Fund.

In addition, to ensure Landscape and Lighting Assessment District 23-1 (Orchard Grove) is self-supporting, it includes an administrative cost factored into the maximum assessment rate to cover preparation of annual Engineer’s Reports and levying of assessments.

Page 182 of 950 ends

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO. E.11
05/27/2025

BACKGROUND
The City previously approved the formation of Landscape & Lighting Assessment District No. 23-1 (the “LLAD”), which is currently comprised of one Subdivision, known as Orchard Grove, consisting of 45 single family residential lots and 6 duet units located east of Adams Lane and north of Gracie Lane. The City is now proposing to annex another residential development, known as the Orchard Grove North project (APN 016-040-004), into the LLAD as Annexation No. 1. (See map below.) The Orchard Grove North project will consist of 30 single family residential lots and 4 duet units at build-out. This project is conditioned to provide a funding mechanism for the annual operation, maintenance, and capital replacement of public streetlights, landscaping, open space areas, trails, parks, etc., that benefit the properties within the LLAD.

The Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 and Proposition 218 require that an Engineer’s Report be generated for the formation of any new assessment district or any annexations into existing assessment districts. The Engineer’s Report identifies public improvements to be maintained, as well as maximum annual assessment rates to be levied on properties benefiting from these improvements. The assessment

Page 183 of 950 ends

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO. E.11
05/27/2025
rates may or may not change each fiscal year, dependent on the maintenance budget, but cannot exceed the maximum annual assessment rates stated in the Engineer’s Report. The maximum annual assessment rates are adjusted each subsequent fiscal year to correspond with the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners Consumer Price Index. The attached Engineer’s Report will set the maximum annual assessment rates for Annexation No. 1 of the LLAD.

The Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 and Proposition 218 require that all annexations into existing assessment districts receive property owner approval from the affected property owners and that a public hearing be held prior to final approval from City Council. The adoption of this Resolution will trigger the noticing and balloting period and the mailing of these notices and ballots to the affected property owners. In order for the ballots to be counted, they must be returned to the City Clerk prior to the close of the public input portion of the public hearing, which will be held on June 10, 2025. At the close of the public input portion of the public hearing, the ballots will be tabulated, and the City Clerk will determine if a majority approval exists to annex the Orchard Grove North project into the LLAD as Annexation No. 1.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC INITIATIVE
Not Applicable.

PREVIOUS ACTION
Previous Action by the City Council is included on Attachment 1.

DATE OF NOTICE
Not Applicable.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
The City’s action is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”, codified at Public Resources Code Sections 21000, et seq., as further governed by the State CEQA Guidelines, found at 14 CCR 15000, et seq.). The action consists of initiation of proceedings for the levying of annual assessments for landscape, lighting, and park maintenance purposes and is within certain classes of projects that have been determined not to have a significant effect on the environment in that it meets the criteria set forth in sections 15273 (Rates, Tolls,

Page 184 of 950 ends

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO. E.11
05/27/2025
Fares, and Charges), 15301(c) (Existing Facilities), and 15306 (Information Collection) of the State CEQA Guidelines.

ALTERNATIVE OPTION(S)

1. Continue item with direction for staff to return with additional information.

2. Do not approve staff’s recommendation and direct staff to modify the Engineer’s Report for Landscape and Lighting Assessment District No. 23-1 (Orchard Grove) Annexation No. 1 for subsequent City Council approval.

3. Do not approve staff’s recommendation and direct staff to work with the Developer to propose an alternative financing mechanism to satisfy the project’s conditions of approval related to funding its ongoing impact on the City’s budgets for operations, maintenance, and capital replacement of public streetlights, landscaping, open space areas, trails, and parks which benefit the properties within the project.

ATTACHMENT(S)

1. Previous Action

2. Resolution

3. Preliminary Engineer’s Report – LLAD 23-1 Orchard Grove (Annexation No.1)

Page 185 of 950 ends

PREVIOUS ACTION
Previous actions related to this agenda item that were taken by the Council are listed below. To view prior actions and materials, and Brentwood Municipal Code references in the staff report, as applicable:
 Visit www.brentwoodca.gov/meetings, and select the meeting date(s) desired to see the reference materials and videos.
 Visit www.brentwoodca.gov/municipalcode to research references to the Brentwood Municipal Code and search by the code section(s) cited.

Actions were taken in previous years to form the City’s 70 existing Landscape & Lighting Assessment Districts.

On August 22, 2023, by Resolution No. 2023-102, the City Council ordered the formation of Landscape & Lighting Assessment District No. 23-1.

On March 25, 2025, by Resolution No. 2025-30, the City Council adopted a resolution of initiation appointing Francisco and Associates as the Engineer of Work for the City’s Landscape and Lighting Assessment Districts.

Page 186 of 950 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 2025-XX

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

BRENTWOOD INITIATING AND DECLARING THE INTENTION TO

ORDER THE ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE &
LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 23-1 AS ANNEXATION
NO. 1; DECLARING THE INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT
ASSESSMENTS, AND SETTING THE DATE OF JUNE 10, 2025, AT
7:00 P.M. OR AT SUCH TIME THEREAFTER THAT THE MATTER

CAN BE HEARD FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING IN ACCORDANCE

WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THE STREETS & HIGHWAYS CODE
“LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972” AND CALIFORNIA
PROPOSITION 218
WHEREAS, Section 22605 of the California Streets and Highways Code allows the City Council to annex territory to an existing assessment district formed under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972; and
WHEREAS, Section 22607 of the California Streets and Highways Code requires proceedings for an annexation of territory into an existing assessment district be initiated, conducted, and completed in substantial accordance with the procedure provided in Article 1 (commencing with Section 22585) of Chapter 2 under the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; and
WHEREAS, Section 22585 of the California Streets and Highways Code requires the City Council to adopt a resolution initiating the proceedings for the annexation of territory into Landscape and Lighting Assessment District 23-1 and describing the proposed improvements being annexed; and WHEREAS, Section 22585 further requires that the City Council order the preparation of an Engineer’s Report in accordance with Article 4 (commencing with Section 22565) of Chapter 1 under the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; and WHEREAS, the Engineer of Work has filed a Preliminary Engineer’s Report for the annexation of territory to Landscape & Lighting Assessment District No. 23-1 as Annexation No. 1 for Fiscal Year 2025-26 with the City Clerk, in accordance with provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; and WHEREAS, Annexation No. 1 consists of the Orchard Grove North project (APN 016-040-004) which will be comprised of 30 single family homes and 4 duets at buildout; and WHEREAS, as required by Section 22587 of the California Streets and Highways Code, the City Council of the City of Brentwood is to adopt a resolution of intention that declares the City Council’s intention to order the annexation of territory to Landscape & Lighting Assessment District No. 23-1 as Annexation No. 1 for Fiscal Year 2025-26, declares the intention to levy and collect assessments; and gives

Page 187 of 950 ends
Page 2 of 2 ends

notice of the time and place for a hearing by the City Council regarding the annexation of territory to Landscape & Lighting Assessment District No. 23-1.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brentwood that:

1. Hereby initiates and declares its intention to order the annexation of territory to Landscape & Lighting Assessment District No. 23-1 as Annexation No. 1 and declares its intention to levy and collect assessments in said Assessment District.

2. Finds that the improvements to be made in this Assessment District are generally described as the operation, maintenance, servicing, and replacement of landscaping, irrigation, parks, lighting and associated facilities located in and along arterial and collector streets and within other public areas as referenced in the Preliminary Engineer’s Report for the Fiscal Year 2025-26 on file with the City Clerk. All interested persons are referred to the Preliminary Engineer’s Report for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the assessment district.

3. Declares that on June 10, 2025, at 7:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, it will conduct a public hearing on the question of the annexation of territory to Landscape & Lighting Assessment District No. 23-1 as Annexation No. 1 and the levy of proposed annual assessments upon the assessable lots and parcels of land within Annexation No. 1. The meeting and hearing will be held at the City Council Chambers, 150 City Park Way, Brentwood, California.

4. Authorizes and directs the City Clerk to give the notice of public hearing required by the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 and Proposition 218.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Brentwood at a regular meeting held on the 27th day of May 2025 by the following vote:

Page 188 of 950 ends

Landscaping and Lighting
Assessment District No. 23-1
Orchard Grove
Annexation No. 1
Fiscal Year 2025-26
Preliminary Engineer’s Report
May 27, 2025

Page 189 of 950 ends

LLAD No. 23-1 (Orchard Grove) Annexation No. 1
Engineer’s Report Fiscal Year 2025-26 TABLE OF CONTENTS i
Page No.

City Directory.........................................................................................................ii Certificates............................................................................................................iii SECTION I Introduction .................................................................................... 1 SECTION II Impacts of Proposition 218............................................................. .3 SECTION III Engineer’s Report ........................................................................... 5 Part A - Plans and Specifications............................................................... 7 Part B - Estimate of Cost ........................................................................... 9 Part C - Assessment District Diagram...................................................... 11 Part D - Method of Apportionment of Assessment................................... 13 Part E - Property Owner List & Assessment Roll ..................................... 28 Appendix A – Maximum Assessment Roll .........................................................A-1 Appendix B – Benefit Boundary Diagrams ........................................................B-1

Page 190 of 950 ends

LLAD No. 23-1 (Orchard Grove) Annexation No. 1
Engineer’s Report Fiscal Year 2025-26 CITY DIRECTORY
ii

CITY OF BRENTWOOD
LANDSCAPE & LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT No. 23-1
(ORCHARD GROVE)
ANNEXATION No. 1
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26

CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS AND CITY STAFF
Susannah Meyer
Mayor
Pa'tanisha Pierson Faye Maloney
Vice Mayor Council Member
Jovita Mendoza Tony Oerlemans
Council Member Council Member
Darin Gale
Interim City Manager
Allen Baquilar Amanda McVey
City Engineer City Clerk
Kerry Breen Darin Gale
Director of Finance & Information Systems Interim Director of Parks & Recreation Francisco & Associates
Assessment Engineer

Page 191 of 950 ends

LLAD No. 23-1 (Orchard Grove) Annexation No. 1
Engineer’s Report Fiscal Year 2025-26 CERTIFICATES
iii

ENGINEER'S REPORT

CITY OF BRENTWOOD
LANDSCAPE & LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 23-1
(ORCHARD GROVE)
ANNEXATION No. 1
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
The undersigned, acting on behalf of Francisco & Associates, respectfully submits the enclosed Engineer’s Report as directed by the City of Brentwood City Council pursuant to the provisions of Article XIIID, Section 4 of the California Constitution and provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 commencing with Section 22500 et. seq. of the California Streets and Highways Code. The undersigned certifies that he is a Professional Engineer, registered in the State of California.

Dated: May 5, 2025 By:

Eduardo Espinoza, P.E.

CE No. 83709
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the Engineer’s Report, together with the Assessment Roll and Assessment District Diagram thereto attached was filed with me on the ___________ day of _________, 2025.

Amanda McVey, City Clerk
City of Brentwood
Contra Costa County, California
By:

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer’s Report, together with the Assessment Roll and the Assessment District Diagram thereto attached, was approved and confirmed by the City Council of the City of Brentwood, Contra Costa County, California, on the ____ ________day of ________, 2025.

Amanda McVey, City Clerk
City of Brentwood
Contra Costa County, California
By:

Page 192 of 950 ends

LLAD No. 23-1 (Orchard Grove) Annexation No. 1 SECTION I Engineer’s Report Fiscal Year 2025-26 INTRODUCTION
1 SECTION I

INTRODUCTION
ENGINEER’S REPORT
LANDSCAPE & LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 23-1
(ORCHARD GROVE)
ANNEXATION No. 1
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
To ensure the proper flow of funds for the ongoing operation, maintenance, servicing and replacement of specific improvements within the City of Brentwood (the “City”), the City Council, through the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, has previously approved the formation of Landscape & Lighting Assessment District (“LLAD”) No. 23-1 (the “District”) and is currently comprised of the Orchard Grove development. The City is proposing to annex another single-family residential development located to the north known as Orchard Grove North into the District (“Annexation No. 1”), which is the purpose of this report.

Improvements, which may be operated, maintained, serviced and replaced by the District, include, but are not limited to:

Street lighting, landscaping, trails and park improvements, and ancillary facilities.

Generally, as a part of the conditions of approval to develop property within the City, property owners/developers are required to mitigate their project’s financial impact to the City. Developers can provide their own financing mechanism to mitigate their impacts or they can form a new LLAD or when applicable, annex into an existing LLAD. The formation of a new LLAD or annexation into an existing LLAD ensures that the operation, maintenance, servicing and replacement costs of these improvements are specifically paid for by those property owners who directly benefit from the improvements.

If Annexation No. 1 is approved, LLAD No. 23-1 (the “District”) will consist of two residential developments — Orchard Grove, which is comprised of 45 single-family homes and six duet units, and Orchard Grove North, which will be comprised of 30 singlefamily homes and four duet units at build-out. In order to annex the Orchard Grove North development into the District, the annexation will need property owner voter approval prior to final approval from City Council. This process is discussed in Section II, ‘Impacts of Proposition 218’ of this Report.

As required by the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, the Engineer’s Report includes:
(1) a description of the improvements to be operated, maintained, serviced and replaced by the District, (2) a cost estimate for the District, and (3) a listing of the proposed maximum assessments to be levied upon each assessable lot or parcel within the District.

Page 193 of 950 ends

LLAD No. 23-1 (Orchard Grove) Annexation No. 1 SECTION I Engineer’s Report Fiscal Year 2025-26 INTRODUCTION
2 The City of Brentwood will hold a public hearing on June 10, 2025, regarding the annexation of Orchard Grove North into the District as Annexation No. 1. At the public hearing the City will provide an opportunity for any interested person to be heard. After the public input portion of the public hearing, the City Clerk will tabulate the assessment ballots. If the assessment ballot tabulation is favorable, the City Council may adopt a resolution annexing the Orchard Grove North development into the District Annexation No. 1 and confirming the maximum assessment rates as originally proposed or as modified.

Payment of these annual assessments for each parcel will be made in the same manner and at the same time as payments are made for their annual property taxes. All funds collected through the assessments must be placed in a special fund and can only be used for the purposes stated within this Report.

Page 194 of 950 ends

LLAD No. 23-1 (Orchard Grove) Annexation No. 1 SECTION II Engineer’s Report Fiscal Year 2025-26 PROPOSITION 218
3 SECTION II
IMPACT OF PROPOSITION 218
LANDSCAPE & LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT No. 23-1
(ORCHARD GROVE)
ANNEXATION No. 1
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
On November 5, 1996, California voters approved Proposition 218 entitled "Right to Vote On Taxes Act" which added Articles XIIIC and XIIID to the California Constitution. While its title refers only to taxes, Proposition 218 established new procedural requirements for the formation and administration of assessment districts.

These procedures stipulate that even if assessments are initially exempt from Proposition 218, new or future increases in assessments must comply with the provisions of Proposition 218. However, if the increase in assessment was anticipated in the property owner approved assessment formula (e.g., CPI increase or assessment cap) then the assessment increase is compliant with the intent and provisions of Proposition 218.

In order to annex the Orchard Grove North development into the District, it will require voter approval from the District property owner(s), prior to final approval from City Council.

In order to comply with the requirements of Proposition 218, the City of Brentwood has implemented the following procedures:
1) Every property owner within the District will be mailed a ballot, which allows the property owners to cast their votes either in favor or against the proposed annexation of the assessment district. A notice describing the assessment, the individual property owner’s maximum annual assessment rate, the duration of the assessment, the reason for the assessment, and the basis upon which the assessment is calculated will accompany the ballots.
2) After the close of the public input portion of the public hearing, the ballots, which have been returned to the City Clerk will be tabulated to determine whether a majority protest against the proposed annexation of the District exists.
3) When tabulating the assessment ballots, they will be weighted based on their proportionate maximum assessment amount.
4) Publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the improvements. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public

Page 195 of 950 ends

LLAD No. 23-1 (Orchard Grove) Annexation No. 1 SECTION II Engineer’s Report Fiscal Year 2025-26 PROPOSITION 218
4 greenbelts and public parkways, utility easements, and that portion of public property that is not used for business purposes similar to private residential, commercial, industrial and institutional activities. Also exempted from the assessments are private streets, utility easements, HOA common areas (except club houses, community centers, parking lots, etc.) and any other parcels that do not receive a special and direct benefit from the improvements.

All property owners will be noticed in accordance with Proposition 218 a minimum of 45 days prior to the Public Hearing unless a shorter notice period was agreed to by all affected property owners. After the Public Hearing and after the ballots have been tabulated, the City Council may adopt a resolution confirming the maximum assessment rate either as originally proposed or as modified.

Page 196 of 950 ends

LLAD No. 23-1 (Orchard Grove) Annexation No. 1 SECTION III Engineer’s Report Fiscal Year 2025-26 ENGINEER'S REPORT 5 SECTION III

ENGINEER'S REPORT PREPARED PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972
SECTION 22500 THROUGH 22679

OF THE CALIFORNIA STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE
Pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California), Proposition 218 and in accordance with the Resolution of Intention accepting the Preliminary Engineer’s Report, adopted by the City Council of the City of Brentwood, on May 27, 2025, and in connection with the proceedings for:

CITY OF BRENTWOOD
LANDSCAPE & LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 23-1
(ORCHARD GROVE)
ANNEXATION No. 1
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
Herein after referred to as the “District", I, Eduardo Espinoza, the duly appointed ENGINEER OF WORK, submit herewith the "Report" consisting of five (5) parts as follows:

PART A: PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
This part describes the improvements in the District. Plans and specifications for the improvements are as set forth on the lists thereof, attached hereto, and are on file in the Office of the Parks & Recreation Department and are incorporated herein by reference.

PART B: ESTIMATE OF COST
This part contains an estimate of the cost of the proposed improvements, including incidental costs and expenses in connection therewith, is as set forth on the lists thereof, attached hereto, and is on file in the Office of the Parks & Recreation and Engineering Department.

PART C: ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
This part incorporates by reference a diagram showing the exterior boundaries of the District and the lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel of land within the District. The diagram has been prepared by the Engineer of Work and is on file in the Office of the Brentwood City Clerk. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the Contra Costa County Assessor for the year when this Report was prepared. The Assessor's maps and records are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Report.

Page 197 of 950 ends

LLAD No. 23-1 (Orchard Grove) Annexation No. 1 SECTION III Engineer’s Report Fiscal Year 2025-26 ENGINEER'S REPORT 6 PART D: METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF ASSESSMENT
This part contains the method of apportionment of assessments, based upon parcel classification of land within the District, in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received.

PART E: PROPERTY OWNER LIST & ASSESSMENT ROLL
This part contains a list of the Contra Costa County Assessor’s Parcel numbers, and the maximum amount to be assessed upon the benefited lands within the District. The Assessment Roll is filed in the Office of the Brentwood City Clerk and is incorporated in this Report by reference. The list is keyed to the records of the Contra Costa County Assessor, which are incorporated herein by reference.

Page 198 of 950 ends

LLAD No. 23-1 (Orchard Grove) Annexation No. 1 SECTION III Engineer’s Report Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART A
7 PART A

PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
The facilities, constructed that benefit the District, and those which may be subsequently operated, maintained, serviced, and replaced are generally described as follows:

The operation, maintenance, servicing and replacement of streetlighting, landscaping, walls, monuments, trails, parks, open space areas, and associated facilities including but not limited to; personnel, electrical energy, utilities such as water, materials, contractual services, and other items necessary for the satisfactory operation, maintenance, servicing and replacement of the facilities as described below.

Streetlighting Facilities Along Arterial and Major Roadways Median and roadside street lights located along arterial and major roadways as shown on the Arterial and Major Roadway Benefit Boundary Diagram (Appendix page B-2) and described in Table 2 of this Report consist of, but are not limited to poles, fixtures, bulbs, conduits, equipment including guys, anchors, posts and pedestals, metering devices, utilities and other appurtenant facilities within the public rights-of-way and easements benefitting parcels within the boundaries of the District.

Landscaping Facilities Along Arterial and Major Roadways Median and roadside landscaping facilities located along arterial and major roadways as shown on the Arterial and Major Roadway Benefit Boundary Diagram (Appendix page B2) and described in Table 3 of this Report consist of, but are not limited to landscaping, irrigation, planting, shrubbery, ground cover, trees, pathways, hardscapes, walls, fences, utilities, and other appurtenant facilities required to provide landscaping within the public rights-of-way and easements benefitting parcels within the boundaries of the District.

Parks Facilities
Community and neighborhood parks and open space facilities as shown on the Parks Benefit Boundary Diagram (Appendix page B-3) and described in Table 4 of this Report consist of, but are not limited to parks, open space, drainage areas, creeks, ponds, pathway materials, landscaping, trees, shrubbery, sidewalks, tot lots, park equipment, playgrounds, fences, etc. including the removal of trash and debris, and other appurtenant facilities within the public park areas, public rights-of-way, and easements benefitting parcels within the boundaries of the District.

In-Tract Streetlighting Facilities
In-tract streetlights located along in-tract roadways of the District are shown on the InTract Benefit Boundary Diagram (Appendix page B-4) and described in Table 5 of this

Page 199 of 950 ends

LLAD No. 23-1 (Orchard Grove) Annexation No. 1 SECTION III Engineer’s Report Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART A
8 Report consist of, but are not limited to poles, fixtures, bulbs, conduits, equipment including guys, anchors, posts and pedestals, metering devices, utilities and other appurtenant facilities within the public rights-of-way and easements benefitting parcels within the boundaries of the District.

In-Tract Landscaping Facilities
In-tract landscaping facilities located within or adjacent to the District are shown on the In-Tract Benefit Boundary Diagram (Appendix page B-4) and described in Table 6 of this Report consist of, but are not limited to landscaping, irrigation, planting, shrubbery, ground cover, trees, pathways, hardscapes, walls, monuments, fences, utilities, and other appurtenant facilities required to provide landscaping within the public rights-of-way and easements benefitting parcels within the boundaries of the District.

Trail Facilities
Maintenance of trail facilities as shown on the Trail Benefit Diagram (Appendix page B-5) and described in Table 7 of this report consist of, but are not limited to: operation, maintenance, servicing, and replacement of open space areas, trails, etc. including landscaping, irrigation, hardscapes, pathway materials, removal of trash and debris, and other appurtenant facilities within the public rights-of-way and easements that benefit parcels within the boundaries of the District.

Page 200 of 950 ends

LLAD No. 23-1 (Orchard Grove) Annexation No. 1 SECTION III Engineer’s Report Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART B
9 PART B

ESTIMATE OF COST
The 1972 Act requires that a special fund be set up for the collection of revenues and expenditures of each LLAD. The Act provides that the total cost of operation, maintenance, servicing and replacement of the street lighting, landscaping, trails, parks, open space areas, and associated facilities, etc. can be recovered by each LLAD.

Incidental expenses including administration of the LLADs, engineering fees, legal fees and all other associated costs of the District can also be included.

Table No. 1 on the following page shows the total operation, maintenance, servicing, and replacement budgets upon completion of all improvements which could be assessed against the benefiting parcels within the District in FY 2025-26 dollars.

Page 201 of 950 ends

LLAD No. 23-1 (Orchard Grove) Annexation No. 1 SECTION III Engineer’s Report Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART B
10 Revenues collected from the assessment shall be used only for the purposes as stated herein. Any balance remaining on July 1 at the end of the fiscal year must be carried over to the next fiscal year.

FY 2025-26 LLAD Other Other Non- General
Improvement Type Cost No. 23-1 LLAD Parcels 1 LLAD Parcels 2 Benefit 3 Arterial Streetlighting $427,995.04 $1,353.00 $328,770.67 $85,845.91 $12,025.46 Arterial Landscaping $4,583,973.06 $16,390.28 $3,972,901.74 $519,969.75 $74,711.29 Community and Neighborhood Parks $9,533,182.58 $18,980.78 $8,139,481.69 $1,050,745.38 $323,974.73 In-Tract Streetlighting4 $3,600.00 $3,528.00 N/A N/A $72.00 In-Tract Landscaping4 $56,552.50 $55,421.45 N/A N/A $1,131.05 Trail Landscaping $1,290,736.85 $14,996.03 $1,068,848.32 $116,540.92 $90,351.58 Maintenance Subtotal $15,896,040.03 $110,669.54 $13,510,002.42 $1,773,101.96 $502,266.11 Local In-Tract Reserves
Capital Reserves5 $14,977.63 $14,737.02 N/A N/A $240.61 Operating Reserves/Contingency5 $14,977.63 $14,737.02 N/A N/A $240.61 Reserves Subtotal $29,955.26 $29,474.04 N/A N/A $481.22 Total $15,925,995.29 $140,143.58 $13,510,002.42 $1,773,101.96 $502,747.33 1 This represents the special benefit amounts allocated to parcels located within other existing City of Brentwood LLADs. These amounts will be paid for by parcels located within those LLADs. 2 This represents the special benefit amounts allocated to parcels not located within existing City of Brentwood LLADs. These amounts will be funded by the City's General Fund or by some other non-LLAD funds until new development occurs on these parcels. 3 General Benefit will be funded by the City's General Fund or by some other non-LLAD funds. 4 Incidental costs such as County Collection Fees, Assessment Engineering, and City Administration costs have been applied exclusively to in-tract improvements and are included in the cost estimate shown for In-Tract Street Lighting and In-Tract Landscaping. 5 The Operating and Capital Reserves shown above only apply to In-Tract Improvements. Since the City transfers funds to LLAD No. 23-1 on July 1, there is no need to collect operating reserves from Other Non-District Parcels and the General Fund.

Table No. 1 - LLAD No. 23-1 Cost Estimate (FY 2025-26 Dollars) Special Benefit

Page 202 of 950 ends

LLAD No. 23-1 (Orchard Grove) Annexation No. 1 SECTION III Engineer’s Report Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART C
11 PART C

ASSESSMENT DISTRICT DIAGRAM
The boundaries of the District are completely within the boundaries of the City of Brentwood. The Assessment Diagram is on file in the Office of the City Clerk of the City of Brentwood and shown on the following page of this Report. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the Contra Costa County Assessor, for the year when this Report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Report.

A reduced copy of the Assessment Diagram for the District is included on the following page.

Page 203 of 950 ends

City of Brentwood
LLAD No. 23-1 (Orchard Grove North) Assessment Diagram
Legend
LLAD No. 23-1 Annexation No. 1 Boundary
LLAD No. 23-1 Boundary
Parcel Lines
± 150 0 150 300 75 Feet
12 Orchard Grove North Project Site
APN
016-004-004

GRACIE LANE
Orchard Grove Project Site
APN
016-004-005

Page 204 of 950 ends

LLAD No. 23-1 (Orchard Grove) Annexation No. 1 SECTION III Engineer’s Report Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
13 PART D

METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF ASSESSMENT
Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, permits the establishment of assessment districts by agencies for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which includes, but is not limited to the operation, maintenance, servicing and replacement of street lighting, landscaping, trails, park, and open space area facilities.

Section 22573 of the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states:
"The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements.”
In addition, Article XIIID, of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional “special benefit” conferred on the property. Article XIIID provides that only special benefits are assessable, and the City must separate the general benefits from the special benefits conferred on a parcel. There is no widely accepted or statutory formula for determining general and special benefit. However, the constitution states that a special benefit is different from a general benefit in that it is “particular and distinct” and “over and above” general benefits received by other properties.

Article XIIID provided that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways, utility easements, and that portion of public property that is not developed and used for business purposes similar to private residential, commercial, industrial and institutional activities.

The amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Additionally, it’s required that the City separate the general benefits from the special benefits, because only special benefits may be assessed.

ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY
The operation, maintenance, servicing and replacement costs for the landscaping, streetlighting, parks, open space areas, and trail facilities are apportioned in accordance with a methodology that is consistent with standard assessment engineering practices.

Page 205 of 950 ends

LLAD No. 23-1 (Orchard Grove) Annexation No. 1 SECTION III Engineer’s Report Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
14 Since the assessments are levied on the owners of properties as shown on the secured property tax rolls, the final assessments must be assigned by Assessor's Parcel Number.

If assessments were to be allocated by parcel, not considering land use, benefit would not be allocated accurately, because a single-family parcel would be paying the same as a 50-unit apartment parcel or a large commercial establishment. Therefore, as previously stated, the total assessment costs are allocated to each parcel of land based on the benefit received by each parcel. The assessment methodology is based on Equivalent Dwelling Units (EDUs) as discussed below.

Single-Family Residential Parcels - The single-family residential parcel has been selected as the basic unit for the calculation of assessments since it represents approximately 90% of the parcels within the City. Therefore, the single-family residential parcel is defined as one EDU per parcel. The assessment methodology used to assign EDUs to other land uses in proportion to the special benefit they receive relative to the single-family residential parcel is discussed below.

Condominium, Duet, Townhome and Mobile Home Parcels - Condominiums, duets, townhomes, and mobile homes on average have approximately 75% of the building square footage compared to a single-family home. Furthermore, studies consistently show that these types of residential products impact public infrastructure approximately 75% as much as a single-family residential parcel. Therefore, all condominium, townhome and mobile home parcels are assessed 0.75 EDUs per parcel.

Multi-Family Residential Units - Multi-family residential units on average have approximately 50% of the building square footage compared to a single-family home.

Furthermore, studies consistently show that multi-family residential units impact public infrastructure approximately 50% as much as a single-family home. Therefore, all multifamily parcels are assessed 0.50 EDUs per unit.

Non-Residential Parcels - Commercial, industrial, institutional, and other non-residential properties are assessed at three (3) EDUs per acre of land. The 3.00 EDU per acre allocation is based upon the average size of a single-family parcel in the City of Brentwood which is approximately 1/6 of an acre. For every acre of non-residential land approximately 6 single-family homes could be constructed on that acre of land which would equate to 6.00 EDUs per acre. Furthermore, it was determined that NonResidential parcels benefit less than residential properties from the authorized improvements because their employees have less time and opportunity to use and benefit from the improvements, than residents who live within the City. Employees typically benefit or may use the improvements before work, during breaks and at lunch, or after work. Residents have the ability to use the improvements during the same times and on weekends and holidays, since they reside in the area. Based on this information, it is reasonable to assume that for non-residential property the opportunity to use and benefit from the improvements is approximately 50% of that realized by residential properties.

Therefore, EDUs assigned to non-residential property are assessed three (3) EDUs per acre of land because they have been discounted by 50% to account for the differences in benefit from improvements conferred on residential and non-residential property.

Page 206 of 950 ends

LLAD No. 23-1 (Orchard Grove) Annexation No. 1 SECTION III Engineer’s Report Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
15 Undeveloped Parcels – All undeveloped properties are assessed at 25% of the developed EDUs assigned for each parcel of land based on the properties land use classification.

Undeveloped properties benefit less from the improvements than developed property because undeveloped properties do not have structures which house residents or utilize employees. However, the improvements funded by the City’s LLADs do benefit undeveloped property because improvements have already been installed that allows for development to occur and to use the improvements immediately upon the initiation of development making the property more attractive. Based on this information, it is reasonable to assume that undeveloped property benefits less than developed property.

To determine the difference in special benefit conferred on developed and undeveloped property, the Contra Costa County Assessor’s assessed values for property within the City were reviewed to determine what percentage of assessed value is typically associated with the underlying land and what percentage is typically associated with the structure. Based upon the review, it was determined that approximately 25% of the assessed value of developed property in the City is associated with the underlying land.

Based on the comparison of benefits of developed property to undeveloped property it is reasonable to assess the undeveloped property at 25% of the rate for developed property.

Therefore, EDUs assigned to undeveloped residential and non-residential property have been discounted by 75% to account for the differences in benefit from improvements conferred on developed and undeveloped property.

Exempt Parcels - Publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the improvements. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways (all of which are typically not assigned an APN by the County), and that portion of public property that is not developed and used for business purposes similar to private commercial, industrial, and institutional activities (such as office buildings like a City Hall, etc.). Also exempted from the assessment would be utility rights-of-ways, common areas (such as in condominium complexes), and any other property that is deemed to be unable to develop by the City. These types of parcels do not benefit from the improvements. Also exempted from the assessments are private streets, utility easements, HOA common areas (except club houses, community centers, parking lots, etc.) and any other parcels that do not receive a special and direct benefit from the improvements.

Furthermore, parcels within the District may be assessed as developed once the final maps have been approved by the City of Brentwood and/or it is anticipated that improvements will need to be maintained or reserve funds will need to be collected for the ensuing fiscal year.

Page 207 of 950 ends

LLAD No. 23-1 (Orchard Grove) Annexation No. 1 SECTION III Engineer’s Report Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
16 QUANTIFICATION OF BENEFIT
The District will provide a funding source for the operation, maintenance, servicing and replacement of streetlighting, landscaping, park, and open space area facilities authorized under the statute that benefit properties within the boundaries of the District. As previously discussed, it’s required that the City separate the general benefits from the special benefits, because only special benefits may be assessed. In order for the City to separate out the costs associated with general and special benefits for each improvement type, an analysis of each improvement was conducted as described below.

Streetlighting Along Arterial and Major Roadways
Streetlighting located along the City’s arterial and major roadways provide a benefit to parcels inside and outside the City. The benefits from streetlights are enhanced illumination which allows for:
• Safer vehicle and pedestrian access to and from property. • Enhanced deterrence of criminal or suspicious activity such as property theft, vandalism, criminal acidity, illegal dumping, and damage to improvements and property.
• Improved ability of pedestrians and motorists to see. • Improved traffic circulation and reduced nighttime accidents and personal property loss.
• Increased nighttime visibility resulting in enhanced safety on roads, streets, and in public areas.

To determine which properties benefit from streetlighting along the City’s arterial and major roadways a benefit analysis was performed. The analysis utilized Google Maps to determine which arterial and major roadways within the City were most likely to be used by property owners/residents when driving or walking to various destinations inside and outside of the City. The analysis showed that all properties within the City would utilize the City’s arterial and major roadway system when traveling to destinations within the City or to other cities and communities. The analysis also found that there are additional properties located outside the City limits that would utilize the City’s arterial and major roadway system when traveling through the City to various destinations outside the City.

Vehicular or pedestrian traffic flow commencing outside of the City but traveling to a destination inside the City was determined to be a special benefit to the destination parcel within the City. The analysis used each parcel’s physical location as a starting destination and then selected ending destinations were inputted (e.g., neighboring cities or communities surrounding the City of Brentwood). If Google Maps showed the property owner/resident located outside the City would pass through and utilize the City’s arterial and major roadway system to travel to a destination outside of the City, then they were considered to receive a benefit from the City’s arterial and major roadway system. In addition, the analysis showed that most parcels outside of the City did not benefit from the improvements because they did not utilize the City’s roadways to travel to a destination parcel outside of the City, but would in most circumstances, if not all rather

Page 208 of 950 ends

LLAD No. 23-1 (Orchard Grove) Annexation No. 1 SECTION III Engineer’s Report Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
17 utilize Highway 4 to traverse the City or use an alternative route, therefore circumventing the City’s arterial and major roadways.

In addition to the special and direct benefits the property owners within the City receive from these enhanced streetlighting improvements, there are also some incidental general benefits received by vehicular and pedestrian flow-through traffic (traffic that does not stop within the City) which originates from properties outside the City limits from individuals who use the City’s arterial and major roadway system to travel to another destination outside of the City. It has been determined that some properties not located within the City, north of the City limits, utilize arterial and major roadways within the City when traveling to destinations south of the City and that some properties not located within City, south and east of the City limits, utilize arterial and major roadways within the City when traveling to a destination north of the City. Properties meeting these criteria have been identified and such benefits must be accounted for and cannot be assessed to the properties within the City’s LLADs.

To quantify and separate the special benefits received by property owners within the City limits and the general benefit received by the property owners outside the City, EDUs were assigned to all benefitting properties (both inside and outside the City). The analysis resulted in a benefit boundary being drawn and EDUs being assigned to one of three categories of parcels: special benefits assigned to properties that lie within the City and not in a LLAD, special benefits assigned to properties that lie within the City and in a LLAD, and general benefits assigned to properties that lie outside the City. The aggregated EDU assignments for each categorization of property determined that 2.81% of the EDUs were attributed to properties located outside of the City. Therefore, it is estimated that 97.19% of the annual cost to operate, maintain, service and replace the arterial and major roadway streetlighting would be a special and direct benefit to the parcels within the City and 2.81% of the annual cost to operate, maintain, service and replace the arterial and major roadway streetlighting would be a general benefit.

Streetlighting Along Arterial and Major Roadway Cost Allocation The 1,405 roadside and median streetlights located along arterial and major roadways within the Arterial and Major Roadway Benefit Boundary cost approximately $428,000 per year to maintain in FY 2025-26 dollars. The cost to maintain the streetlighting along the arterial and major roadways are spread to all benefitting parcels identified within the Arterial and Major Roadway Benefit Boundary. The parcels identified to be within the Arterial and Major Roadway Benefit Boundary equate to 26,097 EDUs which results in an annual cost allocation of $16.40 per EDU in FY 2025-26 dollars. As previously discussed,

97.19% of the annual cost to operate and maintain the streetlights would be a special and direct benefit to the parcels within the Arterial and Major Roadway Benefit Boundary.

Table No. 2 shows the streetlight cost allocation associated with arterials and major roadways.

Page 209 of 950 ends

LLAD No. 23-1 (Orchard Grove) Annexation No. 1 SECTION III Engineer’s Report Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
18 Landscaping Along Arterial and Major Roadways
Landscaping located along the City’s arterial and major roadways provide a benefit to parcels within and outside the City. The benefits from landscaping include enhanced beautification which allows for:
• Enhanced desirability of property through association with the improvements. • Improved aesthetic appeal of properties providing a positive representation of the area and properties.
• Enhanced beautification to the adjacent developments. • Increased sense of pride in ownership of property within the LLADs resulting from well-maintained improvements associated with the properties. • Enhanced quality of life through well-maintained green space and landscaped areas.
• Reduced criminal activity and property-related crimes (especially vandalism) against properties in the LLADs through well-maintained surroundings and amenities including abatement of graffiti.
• Environmental enhancement through improved erosion resistance, dust and debris control, and fire prevention.
• Enhanced environmental quality of the parcels by moderating temperatures, providing oxygenation, and attenuating noise.

To determine which properties benefit from landscaping along the City’s arterial and major roadways a benefit analysis was performed. The analysis utilized Google Maps to determine which arterial and major roadways within the City were most likely to be used by property owners/residents when driving or walking to various destinations inside and outside of the City. The analysis showed that all properties within the City would utilize the City’s arterial and major roadway system when traveling to destinations within the City or to other cities and communities. The analysis also found that there are additional properties located outside the City limits that would utilize the City’s arterial and major roadway system when traveling through the City to various destinations outside the City.

Vehicular or pedestrian traffic flow commencing outside of the City but traveling to a destination inside the City was determined to be a special benefit to the destination parcel within the City. The analysis used each parcel’s physical location as a starting destination and then selected ending destinations were inputted (e.g. neighboring cities or LLAD No. 23-1
LLAD Other Other Non General Cost per EDU
Improvement No. 23-11 LLAD Parcels LLAD Parcels Benefit (FY 2025-26 Type 0.32% 76.82% 20.06% 2.81% Dollars)2
Arterial and Major Roadway
Streetlighting $1,353.00 $328,770.67 $85,845.91 $12,025.46 $16.40 1 LLAD No. 23-1 is comprised of the Orchard Grove and Orchard Grove North development. 2 The LLAD No. 23-1 Cost per EDU was determined by dividing the LLAD No. 23-1 costs attributed to special benefit by the projected number of EDUs for LLAD No. 23-1.

Special Benefit
Table No. 2 - Arterial and Major Roadway Street Lighting Cost Allocation

Page 210 of 950 ends

LLAD No. 23-1 (Orchard Grove) Annexation No. 1 SECTION III Engineer’s Report Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
19 communities surrounding the City of Brentwood). If Google Maps showed the property owner/resident located outside the City would pass through and utilize the City’s arterial and major roadway system to travel to a destination outside of the City, then they were considered to receive a benefit from the City’s arterial and major roadway system. In addition, the analysis showed that most parcels outside of the City did not benefit from the improvements because they did not utilize the City’s roadways to travel to a destination parcel outside of the City, but would in most circumstances, if not all rather utilize Highway 4 to traverse the City or use an alternative route, therefore circumventing the City’s arterial and major roadways.

In addition to the special and direct benefits the property owners within the City receive from these enhanced landscaping improvements, there are also some incidental general benefits received by vehicular and pedestrian flow-through traffic (traffic that does not stop within the City) which originates from properties outside the City limits from individuals who use the City’s arterial and major roadway system to travel to another destination outside of the City. It has been determined that some properties not located within the City, north of the City limits, utilize arterial and major roadways within the City when traveling to destinations south of the City and that some properties not located within City, south and east of the City limits, utilize arterial and major roadways within the City when traveling to a destination north of the City. Properties meeting these criteria have been identified and such benefits must be accounted for and cannot be assessed to the properties within the City’s LLADs.

To quantify and separate the special benefits received by property owners within the City limits and the general benefit received by the property owners outside the City, EDUs were assigned to all benefitting properties (both inside and outside the City). The analysis resulted in a benefit boundary being drawn and EDUs being assigned to one of three categories of parcels: special benefits assigned to properties that lie within the City and not in a LLAD, special benefits assigned to properties that lie within the City and in a LLAD, and general benefits assigned to properties that lie outside the City. It was determined that parcels within the categories that are not in a LLAD benefit less than parcels within the LLADs due to the proximity of the landscaping to the properties within the LLADs. This finding resulted in the EDUs assigned to parcels in the City and not in a LLAD and parcels outside the City being reduced by 50%. The aggregated EDU assignments for each categorization of property determined that 1.63% of the EDUs were attributed to properties located outside of the City. Therefore, it is estimated that 98.37% of the annual cost to operate, maintain, service and replace the arterial and major roadway landscaping would be a special and direct benefit to the parcels within the City and 1.63% of the annual cost to operate, maintain, service and replace the arterial and major roadway landscaping would be a general benefit.

Landscaping Along Arterial and Major Roadway Cost Allocation The 117.537 acres of City-maintained landscaping along the arterial and major roadways within the Arterial and Major Roadway Benefit Boundary cost approximately $4,584,000 per year to maintain in FY 2025-26 dollars. The cost to maintain the arterial and major roadway landscaping is spread to all benefitting parcels identified within the Arterial and

Page 211 of 950 ends

LLAD No. 23-1 (Orchard Grove) Annexation No. 1 SECTION III Engineer’s Report Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
20 Major Roadway Benefit Boundary. The parcels identified on the Arterial and Major Roadway Benefit Boundary equate to 23,073 EDUs which results in an annual cost allocation of $198.67 per EDU in FY 2025-26 dollars. As previously discussed, 98.37% of the annual cost to operate and maintain the roadside and median landscaping would be a special and direct benefit to the parcels within the Arterial and Major Roadway Benefit Boundary. Table 3 shows the landscaping cost allocation associated with arterials and major roadways.

Park Facilities
The City of Brentwood’s General Plan policy is aimed at ensuring that recreational opportunities will continue to exist throughout the City and that an adequate park system continues to be developed and maintained to serve the City. In keeping with these policies, the City Council formed a Citywide Park Assessment district for park maintenance in 1997 to secure a funding mechanism for a portion of the benefits and associated costs to maintain community parks and neighborhood parks. In addition, the City’s LLADs were also established to fund park costs associated with each benefiting property for the community and neighborhood parks that could not be funded from the Citywide Park Assessment District. For the purposes of this report, community parks are defined as typically being larger parks that are designed with amenities to serve the City as a whole as described further in the Parks, Trails and Recreation Master Plan originally approved on August 23, 1994 and subsequently approved on June 25, 2002.

Neighborhood parks are defined as being generally smaller than community parks and typically benefit those residents located within a one-half mile radius from the park and as further defined within the Parks, Trails and Recreation Master Plan previously referenced.

There are 100 Parks spread throughout the City serving a population of approximately 65,000 residents. Community and neighborhood parks provide a special and direct benefit to the parcels within the City. The special and direct benefit to the parcels consists of enhanced recreational opportunities, including baseball, soccer, swimming, basketball, walking, jogging, etc. and the use of improvements such as: picnic tables, barbequing, playground equipment, community center rooms, green spaces, benches, bioswales, etc.

The parks and the associated recreational opportunities provide for more aesthetically pleasing neighborhoods, environmental and health benefits, community gathering places, and an overall improved and healthier community image, etc. If these park improvements LLAD No. 23-1
LLAD Other Other Non General Cost per EDU
No. 23-1 District Parcels District Parcels Benefit (FY 2025-26 Improvement Type 0.36% 86.67% 11.34% 1.63% Dollars)1
Arterial and Major Roadway
Landscaping $16,390.28 $3,972,901.74 $519,969.75 $74,711.29 $198.67 1 LLAD No. 23-1 is comprised of the Orchard Grove and Orchard Grove North development. 2 The LLAD No. 23-1 Cost per EDU was determined by dividing the LLAD No. 23-1 costs attributed to special benefit by the projected number of EDUs for LLAD No. 23-1.

Special Benefit
Table No. 3 - Arterial and Major Roadway Landscaping Cost Allocation

Page 212 of 950 ends

LLAD No. 23-1 (Orchard Grove) Annexation No. 1 SECTION III Engineer’s Report Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
21 were not installed, property within the City’s LLADs would not look as appealing to property owners, prospective property buyers, and patrons alike, which would adversely affect the value of their property. Based on the Parks and Economic Development Report published in the American Planning Association, homes adjacent and near parks and open space are typically valued at 8-20% higher than comparable properties, with positive price effect declining to zero about ½ mile away. Therefore, park improvements provide a special and direct benefit to property located within ½ miles of park improvements.

Furthermore, the Brentwood Parks, Trails, and Recreation Master Plan development guidelines as previously referenced herein, states that, neighborhood parks should service residents within a ½ mile +/- radius or approximately 1,000 to 2,000 people. The City maintains on average one neighborhood park per 800 residents. In addition to the special and direct benefits the property owners receive within the City from these enhanced park improvements, there are also some incidental benefits received by residents located from outside the City that may utilize the City’s community and neighborhood parks. Even though these are incidental benefits, they must be accounted for and cannot be assessed to the properties within the City’s LLADs.

Based on park user data, it is conservatively estimated that approximately 95% of the benefits associated with community parks are of benefit to property within the City and 98% of the benefits associated with neighborhood parks are of a special and direct benefit to properties within ½ mile distance (+/-). Therefore, 95% of the costs to annually operate, maintain, service and replace the community parks and 98% of the costs to annually operate, maintain, service and replace the neighborhood parks would be a special and direct benefit to the parcels within the City, and 5% and 2%, respectively of the annual costs to operate, maintain, service and replace the parks would be a general benefit.

Park Facilities Cost Allocation
The approximate 254.275 acres of community and neighborhood parks within the Park Benefit Boundary cost approximately $9,533,200 to maintain in FY 2025-26 dollars. The cost to maintain the parks is spread to all benefitting parcels identified within the Parks Benefit Boundary.

The community parks within the Park Benefit Boundary cost approximately $4,443,700 to maintain in FY 2025-26 dollars. As previously discussed, 95% of the annual cost to operate and maintain community parks is considered a special and direct benefit to the parcels within the park benefit boundary and 5% of the annual cost to operate and maintain community parks is considered a general benefit. The parcels identified within the Park Benefit Boundary equate to 23,043 EDUs, which results in an annual cost allocation of $86.60 per EDU in FY 2025-26 dollars for community parks. Table 4A shows the cost allocation associated with community parks.

Page 213 of 950 ends

LLAD No. 23-1 (Orchard Grove) Annexation No. 1 SECTION III Engineer’s Report Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
22 The neighborhood parks within the Park Benefit Boundary cost approximately $5,089,500 to maintain in FY 2025-26 dollars. As previously discussed, approximately 98% of the annual cost to operate and maintain neighborhood parks is considered a special and direct benefit to the parcels within the park benefit boundary and 2% of the annual cost to operate and maintain neighborhood parks is considered a general benefit. The parcels identified within the Park Benefit Boundary equate to 23,043 EDUs, which results in an annual cost allocation of $143.47 per EDU in FY 2025-26 dollars for neighborhood parks.

Table 4B shows the cost allocation associated with neighborhood parks.

The total annual cost allocation needed to maintain the community and neighborhood parks within the Park Benefit Boundary is $230.07 per EDU in FY 2025-26 dollars as summarized in Table 4C below.

In-Tract Streetlighting
To determine which properties benefit from in-tract or development specific streetlighting a benefit analysis was performed. Streetlighting located along and adjacent to the in-tract streets provide a special and direct benefit to parcels within the developments. The special and direct benefits from streetlights within the development consists of enhanced illumination which allows for safer vehicle and pedestrian access to and from property. In addition, this enhanced illumination helps deter criminal or suspicious activity such as LLAD No. 23-1
LLAD Other Other Non General Cost per EDU
Improvement No. 23-1 District Parcels District Parcels Benefit (FY 2025-26 Type 0.16% 85.94% 8.90% 5.00% Dollars)1
Parks $7,144.50 $3,818,865.13 $395,508.11 $222,185.14 $86.60 1 LLAD No. 23-1 is comprised of the Orchard Grove and Orchard Grove North development. 2 The LLAD No. 23-1 Cost per EDU was determined by dividing the LLAD No. 23-1 costs attributed to special benefit by the projected number of EDUs for LLAD No. 23-1.

Special Benefit
Table No. 4A - Community Park Cost Allocation
LLAD No. 23-1
LLAD Other Other Non General Cost per EDU
Improvement No. 23-1 District Parcels District Parcels Benefit (FY 2025-26 Type 0.2% 84.89% 12.87% 2.00% Dollars)1
Parks $11,836.28 $4,320,616.56 $655,237.27 $101,789.59 $143.47 1 LLAD No. 23-1 is comprised of the Orchard Grove and Orchard Grove North development. 2 The LLAD No. 23-1 Cost per EDU was determined by dividing the LLAD No. 23-1 costs attributed to special benefit by the projected number of EDUs for LLAD No. 23-1.

Table No. 4B - Neighborhood Park Cost Allocation
Special Benefit
Community Park Neighborhood Park Parks
Cost per EDU Cost per EDU Cost per EDU
$86.60 $143.47 $230.07
Table No. 4C - Parks FY 2025-26 Annual Cost Allocation

Page 214 of 950 ends

LLAD No. 23-1 (Orchard Grove) Annexation No. 1 SECTION III Engineer’s Report Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
23 property theft, vandalism, illegal dumping, etc.

Since the in-tract streets within the development are designed to have minimal flow through traffic, there are few reasons for vehicles to access the in-tract streets unless their destination is to or from a single-family residential parcel within the development.

However, it is reasonable to conclude that some vehicular traffic may on a rare occasion utilize the in-tract streets due to the need to turn around or a mistaken turn into the development. The rare circumstance where a pedestrian or vehicle mistakenly uses the in-tract streets, have been determined to be a rare and infrequent circumstance. Even though these are rare and infrequent circumstances, they must be accounted for and cannot be assessed to the properties within the City’s LLADs. Therefore, based on flowthrough traffic it is conservatively estimated that approximately 98% of the annual trips along in-tract roadways within the development would be a special and direct benefit to the parcels within the City’s LLADs and 2% of the annual trips along in-tract roadways within the development would be a general benefit.

To quantify and separate the special benefits received by all property within the development EDUs were assigned to all benefitting properties inside the development as identified. It was determined that 2% of the cost to operate, maintain, service and replace the in-tract street lighting were assigned to properties located outside of the development.

Therefore, it is estimated that 98% of the annual cost to operate, maintain, service and replace the in-tract streetlighting would be a special and direct benefit to the parcels within each development and 2% of the annual cost to operate, maintain, service and replace the in-tract streetlighting would be a general benefit.

In-Tract Streetlighting Cost Allocation
The in-tract streetlights within the In-Tract Benefit Boundary cost approximately $3,600 to maintain in FY 2025-26 dollars. As previously discussed, 98% of the annual cost to operate and maintain the in-tract streetlights is a special and direct benefit to the parcels within the In-Tract Benefit Boundary and is spread to all benefitting parcels within the InTract Benefit Boundary. The parcels identified on the In-Tract Benefit Boundary equate to 82.50 EDUs which results in an annual cost allocation of $42.76 per EDU in FY 2025- 26 dollars. Table 5 shows the cost allocation associated with in-tract streetlights.

LLAD No. 23-1
LLAD General Cost per EDU
Improvement FY 2025-26 No. 23-11 Benefit (FY 2025-26
Type Cost 98.00% 2.00% Dollars)2
In-Tract Streetlighting $3,600.00 $3,528.00 $72.00 $42.76 1 LLAD No. 23-1 is comprised of the Orchard Grove and Orchard Grove North development. 2 The LLAD No. 23-1 cost per EDU was determined by dividing the LLAD No. 23-1 costs attributed to special benefit by the projected number of EDUs for LLAD No. 23-1.

Table No. 5 - Local In-Tract Streetlighting Cost Allocation

Page 215 of 950 ends

LLAD No. 23-1 (Orchard Grove) Annexation No. 1 SECTION III Engineer’s Report Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
24 In-Tract Landscaping
To determine which properties benefit from in-tract or development specific landscaping a benefit analysis was performed. Landscaping located along and adjacent to the in-tract streets provide a special and direct benefit to parcels within the development. The special and direct benefits from in-tract landscaping within the development consists of enhanced beautification to the entrances and along the roadsides within the development. Property owners who reside within these developments realize this enhanced aesthetic benefit when they are entering and exiting the development. If these in-tract landscape improvements were not installed, the developments would not look as appealing to property owners and prospective property buyers which would adversely affect the value of their property. Therefore, these landscape improvements provide a specific enhancement to their property values and not a general enhancement of property values.

Since the in-tract streets within the development are designed to have minimal flow through traffic, there are few reasons for vehicles to access the in-tract streets unless their destination is to or from a single-family residential parcel within the development.

However, it is reasonable to conclude that some vehicular traffic may on a rare occasion utilize the in-tract streets due to the need to turn around or a mistaken turn into the development. The rare circumstance where a pedestrian or vehicle mistakenly uses the in-tract streets, have been determined to be a rare and infrequent circumstance. Even though these are rare and infrequent circumstances, they must be accounted for and cannot be assessed to the properties within the City’s LLADs. Therefore, based on flowthrough traffic it is conservatively estimated that approximately 98% of the annual trips along in-tract roadways within the development would be a special and direct benefit to the parcels within the LLADs and 2% of the annual trips along in-tract roadways within the development would be a general benefit.

To quantify and separate the special benefits received by all property within the development EDUs were assigned was applied to all benefitting properties inside the development as identified. It was determined that 2% of the cost to operate, maintain, service and replace the in-tract landscaping were assigned to properties located outside of the development. Therefore, it is estimated that 98% of the annual cost to operate, maintain, service and replace the in-tract landscaping would be a special and direct benefit to the parcels within the development and 2% of the annual cost to operate, maintain, service and replace the in-tract landscaping would be a general benefit.

In-Tract Landscaping Cost Allocation
The 2.46 acres of in-tract landscaping within the In-Tract Benefit Boundary cost approximately $56,553 to maintain in FY 2025-26 dollars. As previously discussed, 98% of the annual cost to operate and maintain the in-tract landscaping is a special and direct benefit to the parcels within the In-Tract Benefit Boundary and is spread to all benefitting parcels within the In-Tract Benefit Boundary. The parcels identified on the In-Tract Benefit Boundary equate to 82.50 EDUs which results in an annual cost allocation of $671.78 per EDU in FY 2025-26 dollars. Table 6 shows the cost allocation associated with in-tract landscaping.

Page 216 of 950 ends

LLAD No. 23-1 (Orchard Grove) Annexation No. 1 SECTION III Engineer’s Report Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
25 Trails
Trails provide special and direct benefits to the parcels located within a certain proximity to the trails. These special and direct benefits consist of enhanced recreational opportunities such as walking, jogging, biking, etc. within and along their developments.

These benefits allow for:
• Increases in options to exercise and incorporate recreational opportunities into daily routines.
• Increases in opportunities to travel and connect with places people may need or want to go.
• Enhanced environmental opportunities because of improvement in air quality due to people utilizing the trail verse driving to nearby destinations. • Specific enhancements in property values due to the increase in walkability of an area and the increase in amenities.

In addition, the trails provide general benefits to the public-at-large since they it is a public trail system and anyone from the public can access it. To determine who is most likely to use trails, the City’s Parks and Recreation Department staff performed a trail user survey over multiple days at different times and locations along existing trail segments over a three-month period. Based upon their survey findings, ninety-three percent (93%) of trail users were benefitting property owners located both within the City and those outside the City limits, who lived within ½-mile (+/-) of trails. The ½-mile benefit boundaries from each respective trail can vary slightly for trail segments due to the location of geographical features and major roadways. Therefore, it is estimated that 93% of the annual cost to operate, maintain, service and replace the trail improvements would be a special and direct benefit to the parcels within the ½-mile (+/-) distance both within and outside the City and 7% of the annual cost to operate, maintain, service and replace the trail improvements would be a general benefit. Special benefits assigned to properties that lie within a ½ mile (+/-) of trails that are not within a LLAD (in or outside the City), are special benefits that will be paid by the City because they cannot be assessed to parcels within LLADs. Only the benefits associated with properties within the City and within a LLAD that are within a ½ mile (+/-) distance of trails will be assessed.

Trails Assessment Allocation
The 27.828 acres of trails within the District Trail Benefit Boundary (Appendix B) cost approximately $1,290,700 to maintain in FY 2025-26 dollars. As previously discussed, LLAD No. 23-1
LLAD General Cost per EDU
Improvement FY 2025-26 No. 23-11 Benefit (FY 2025-26
Type Cost 98.00% 2.00% Dollars)2
In-Tract Landscaping/Fencing and Soundwalls $56,552.50 $55,421.45 $1,131.05 $671.78 1 LLAD No. 23-1 is comprised of the Orchard Grove and Orchard Grove North development. 2 The LLAD No. 23-1 cost per EDU was determined by dividing the LLAD No. 23-1 costs attributed to special benefit by the projected number of EDUs for LLAD No. 23-1.

Table No. 6 - Local In-Tract Landscaping Cost Allocation

Page 217 of 950 ends

LLAD No. 23-1 (Orchard Grove) Annexation No. 1 SECTION III Engineer’s Report Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
26 93% of the annual cost to operate and maintain these trail segments are a special and direct benefit to the parcels within the Trail Benefit Boundary and is spread to all benefitting parcels within the Trail Benefit Boundary. The parcels identified to be within the Trail Benefit Boundary equate to 6,603.87 EDUs which results in an annual cost allocation of $181.77 per EDU in FY 2025-26 dollars. Table No. 7 below shows the cost allocation associated with the District Trail Benefit Boundary.

DISTRICT MAXIMUM ASSESSMENT RATE
The maximum assessment rate may be adjusted each subsequent fiscal year to correspond with the annual increase in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners Consumer Price Index from December to December of each year (Base Year of 2024), or 2% whichever is greater.

Parcels within the District become assessable once the final maps have been approved by the City of Brentwood or it is anticipated that improvements will need to be maintained or reserve funds will need to be collected in the ensuing fiscal year.

The following table outlines the total maximum assessment rate in FY 2025-26 dollars.

LLAD No. 23-1
LLAD Other District Non District General Cost per EDU
Improvement No. 23-1 Parcels Parcels Benefit (FY 2025-26 Type 1.16% 82.81% 9.03% 7.00% Dollars)2
City Trails $14,996.03 $1,068,848.32 $116,540.92 $90,351.58 $181.77 1 LLAD No. 23-1 is comprised of the Orchard Grove and Orchard Grove North development. 2 The LLAD No. 23-1 cost per EDU was determined by dividing the LLAD No. 23-1 costs attributed to special benefit by the projected number of EDUs for LLAD No. 23-1.

Table No. 7 - Trail Cost Allocation
Special Benefit

Page 218 of 950 ends

LLAD No. 23-1 (Orchard Grove) Annexation No. 1 SECTION III Engineer’s Report Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
27 Other Other Non LLAD No. 23-1
LLAD No. 23-1 District Parcel District Parcel Rate per EDU FY 2025-26 Special Special Special General (FY 2025-26
Improvement Type Cost Benefit Benefit1 Benefit2 Benefit3 Dollars) Arterial and Major Roadway Streetlighting $427,995.04 $1,353.00 $328,770.67 $85,845.91 $12,025.46 $16.40 Arterial and Major Roadway Landscaping $4,583,973.06 $16,390.28 $3,972,901.74 $519,969.75 $74,711.29 $198.67 Community and Neighborhood Parks $9,533,182.58 $18,980.78 $8,139,481.69 $1,050,745.38 $323,974.73 $230.07 In-Tract Streetlighting4 $3,600.00 $3,528.00 N/A N/A $72.00 $42.76 In-Tract Landscaping4 $56,552.50 $55,421.45 N/A N/A $1,131.05 $671.78 Trail Landscaping $1,290,736.85 $14,996.03 $1,068,848.32 $116,540.92 $90,351.58 $181.77 Subtotal $15,896,040.03 $110,669.54 $13,510,002.42 $1,773,101.96 $502,266.11 $1,341.45 Capital Reserves5 $14,977.63 $14,737.02 N/A N/A $240.61 $178.63 Operating Reserves/Contingency5 $14,977.63 $14,737.02 N/A N/A $240.61 $178.63 Subtotal $29,955.26 $29,474.04 N/A N/A $481.22 $357.26
Total $15,925,995.29 $140,143.58 $13,510,002.42 $1,773,101.96 $502,747.33 $1,698.71 1 This represents the special benefit amounts allocated to parcels located within other existing City of Brentwood LLADs. These amounts will be paid for by parcels located within those LLADs.
2 This represents the special benefit amounts allocated to parcels not located within existing City of Brentwood LLADs. These amounts will be funded by the City's General Fund or by some other non-LLAD funds until new development occurs on these parcels. 3 General Benefit will be funded by the City's General Fund or by some other non-LLAD funds. 4 Incidental costs such as County Collection Fees, Assessment Engineering, and City Administration costs have been applied exclusively to in-tract improvements and are included in the cost estimate for In-Tract Street Lighting and In-Tract Landscaping. 5 The Operating and Capital Reserves shown above only apply to In-Tract Improvements. Since the City transfers funds to LLAD No. 23-1 on July 1, there is no need to collect operating reserves from Other Non-District Parcels and the General Fund.

Table No. 8 - Total Maximum Assessment Calculation (FY 2025-26 Dollars)

Page 219 of 950 ends

LLAD No. 23-1 (Orchard Grove) Annexation No. 1 SECTION III Engineer’s Report Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART E
28 PART E

PROPERTY OWNER LIST & ASSESSMENT ROLL
A list of names and addresses of the owners of all parcels, and the description of each lot or parcel proposed for the District is shown on the last equalized Property Tax Roll of the Contra Costa County Assessor, which by reference is hereby made a part of this Report.

This list is keyed to the Assessor's Parcel Numbers as shown on the Assessment Roll, which includes the maximum proposed amount of assessments apportioned to each lot or parcel. The Maximum Assessment Roll is on file in the Office of the City Clerk of the City of Brentwood and is shown in this Report as Appendix “A”.

Page 220 of 950 ends

LLAD No. 23-1 (Orchard Grove) Annexation No. 1
Engineer’s Report Fiscal Year 2025-26 APPENDIX A
A-1

APPENDIX A

MAXIMUM ASSESSMENT ROLL

Page 221 of 950 ends

LLAD No. 23-1 (Orchard Grove) Annexation No. 1
Engineer’s Report Fiscal Year 2025-26 APPENDIX A
A-2
Assessor Parcel Development FY 2025-26
Numbers Name Maximum Assessment
016-040-004 Orchard Grove North $56,057.43
016-040-005 Orchard Grove $84,086.15
Total $140,143.58
LLAD No. 23-1 (Orchard Grove)

Page 222 of 950 ends

LLAD No. 23-1 (Orchard Grove) Annexation No. 1
Engineer’s Report Fiscal Year 2025-26 APPENDIX B
B-1

APPENDIX B

BENEFIT BOUNDARY DIAGRAMS

Page 223 of 950 ends

*
*
Street Lighting and Landscaping along Arterial and Major Roadways Benefit Boundary Diagram
LLAD No. 23-1
¯ 0 2,500 5,000
Feet
4 4
Brentwood Blvd
Sellers Ave
Sunset Rd
Concord Ave
Byron Hwy
Bixler Rd
Chestnut St
Brentwood Blvd
Minnesota Ave
Orchard Grove North
Project Site
APN 016-040-004
B-2
Neroly Rd Delta Rd
Brentwood Blvd
O'Hara Ave
Sycamore Ave
Sand Creek Rd
Oak St
Lone Tree Wy
Fairview
Ave
Empire Ave
Shady Willow Ln
Jeffrey Wy Sand Creek Rd
Balfour Rd
Central Blvd
Fairv ei w
Ave
Griffith Ln
Walnut Blvd
Vineyards Pkwy
Orchard Grove Annexation No. 1
Project Site
APN 016-040-005
Legend
LLAD No. 23-1 Boundary
City Limit
Parcel Lines
Parcels outside of City Limits - East/South Bound
Parcels outside of City Limits - North/West Bound
Parcels within City Limits
City Arterial/Major Roadways
LLAD No. 23-1 Annexation No. 1 Boundary

Page 224 of 950 ends

LLAD No. 23-1
Parks Benefit Diagram
Lone Tree Wy
Sand Creek Rd
Balfour Rd
Brentwood Blv
F
d
airview
Ave
Minnesota Ave
Grant St
O'Hara Ave
Brentwood Blvd
John Muir Pkwy
4 ¯
Sunset
Park
Aquatic Complex
& Skate Park
King
Park
Miwok Park
Oak Meadow
Park
Apple Hill
Park
Arbor View
Park
Garin
Park
Summerset
Commons
Park
Sand Creek
Soccer
B-3
4 2,000 1,000 0 2,000
Feet
Orchard Grove North
Project Site
APN 016-040-004
Annexation No. 1
Orchard Grove
Project Site
APN 016-040-005
Legend
LLAD No. 23-1 Boundary
City Limit
Parcel Lines
Parcels within the
Neighborhood Park Boundary
Community Park
Neighborhood Park
LLAD No. 23-1 Annexation No. 1 Boundary

Page 225 of 950 ends

!(
!(
!(
!(
!( !( !( !(
!( !( !( !(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
City of Brentwood - LLAD No. 23-1 In-Tract Benefit Diagram ±
175 87.5 0 175
Feet

TRELLIS CIRCLE
ADAMS
LANE
L
O
N
E
O
A
K
R
O
A
D
Remainder
Parcel A
Parcel A
Legend
LLAD 23-1 Annexation No. 1 Boundary
Parcel Lines
LLAD 23-1 Boundary
Proposed Landscaping
Proposed Bio Retention
Proposed Access Road
!( Proposed Streetlights
Proposed 2-Rail Fence
Proposed 6ft Masonry Wall

GRACIE LANE
Not part of
LLAD No. 23-1

Page 226 of 950 ends

City of Brentwood - LLAD No. 23-1 Trail Benefit Diagram B-5
Fairview
Ave
Brentwood Blvd
O
H' ara Ave
E
mpire Ave
Lone Tree Wy
Sand Creek Rd
4 850
¯0 850
Feet
Orchard Grove North
Project Site
APN 016-040-004
Annexation No. 1
Orchard Grove
Project Site
APN 016-040-005
Legend
LLAD No. 23-1 Annexation No. 1 Boundary
City Limit
Parcel Lines
Grant Street Trail Benefit Boundary
Parcels within Grant Street Trail Benefit Boundary
Grant Street Trail
LLAD No. 23-1 Boundary

Page 227 of 950 ends

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO. E.12
05/27/2025
SUBJECT: Resolution authorizing the execution of a Memorandum of Understanding with the Brentwood Senior Citizens Club
DEPARTMENT: Parks and Recreation
STAFF: Vatsal Patel, Acting Parks and Recreation Director Thien Nguyen, Recreation Manager
Lindsay Pinell, Recreation Supervisor

TITLE/RECOMMENDATION
Adopt a Resolution approving and authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to execute a Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”) between the City of Brentwood and the Brentwood Senior Citizens Club, Inc., to support the delivery of a broad range of programs, activities, and services at the Brentwood Senior Activity Center (“BSAC”) and the Brentwood Community Center (“BCC”) through June 30, 2028. The Resolution also includes approval of a fee waiver for facility use for three (3) years during fiscal years 2025/26, 2026/27 and 2027/28, in an amount not to exceed $100,000 per fiscal year.

The purpose of this item is to formalize the City’s partnership with the Brentwood Senior Citizens Club through a MOU, and to authorize a fee waiver for use of City facilities during the 2025/26, 2026/27 and 2027/28 fiscal years to support continued senior programming and services.

FISCAL IMPACT
The Brentwood Senior Citizens Club, Inc. (“Club”) is requesting a MOU effective July 1, 2025 through June 30, 2028, for senior programs. The Club is also requesting a fee waiver for the use of the BSAC and the BCC in an annual amount not to exceed $100,000 for three (3) years, FY 2025/26, FY 2026/27, and FY 2027/28. If the City Council approves the fee waiver, the amount will not have an impact on the 2025/26 General Fund Operating Budget. The waiver for FY 2026/27 and FY 2027/28 will be taken into consideration in the 2026/27 – 2027/28 General Fund Operating Budget process.

Page 228 of 950 ends

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO. E.12
05/27/2025

BACKGROUND
The Club has been providing services to seniors in the Brentwood community for decades with a longstanding partnership with the City for senior programs, activities, and services.

With completion of the BSAC in 2009, the City and the Club desired to continue their existing relationship, and thus executed their first MOU. The City has waived facility fees for programs, activities, and services as they relate to this MOU for both the BSAC and BCC. The Club has been responsible for payment of registration processing and transaction fees, and cleaning fees and staff costs for any additional programs, activities, and services not identified in the MOU. Senior services offered by the Club through the MOU at BSAC and BCC include holiday luncheons and dinners, Boogie Nites, Bingo, Brown Bag Food Program, Book Banter, bridge games and lessons, ballet folklorico, decorative painting classes, knitting, line dancing, Mahjong and more.

For the three (3) year term of this MOU (FY 2025/26, FY 2026/27 and FY 2027/28), the waiving of fees per fiscal year will be in an amount not to exceed $100,000 per fiscal year.

It is Staff’s recommendation that the City Council adopt a Resolution approving and authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to execute a Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Brentwood and the Brentwood Senior Citizens Club, Inc., to support the delivery of a broad range of programs, activities, and services at the Brentwood Senior Activity Center and the Brentwood Community Center, through June 30, 2028.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC INITIATIVE
Focus Area 5 Parks and Recreation Services: Goal 4 Expand and enhance recreation opportunities by increasing programming for seniors, youth and teens; implementing adaptive recreation.

PREVIOUS ACTION
Previous Action by the City Council is included on Attachment 1.

DATE OF NOTICE
Not Applicable.

Page 229 of 950 ends

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO. E.12
05/27/2025

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
Not Applicable.

ALTERNATIVE OPTION(S)

1. Do not approve staff’s recommendation to approve the MOU with the Brentwood Senior Citizen’s Club, Inc., which may result in a gap of program offerings for seniors at BSAC and BCC.

2. Continue item with direction for staff to return with additional information, which may result in a gap of program offerings for seniors at BSAC and BCC if not completed and approved by June 30, 2025.

ATTACHMENT(S)

1. Previous Action

2. Resolution

3. MOU

Page 230 of 950 ends

PREVIOUS ACTION
Previous actions related to this agenda item that were taken by the Council are listed below. To view prior actions and materials, and Brentwood Municipal Code references in the staff report, as applicable:
 Visit www.brentwoodca.gov/meetings, and select the meeting date(s) desired to see the reference materials and videos.
 Visit www.brentwoodca.gov/municipalcode to research references to the Brentwood Municipal Code and search by the code section(s) cited.

On June 22, 2010, the City Council adopted Resolution 2010-86 approving a Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Brentwood and the Brentwood Senior Citizens Club, Inc., regarding running a wide variety of programs, activities, and services at the Brentwood Senior Activity Center and approving a fee waiver for fiscal year 2010/11 in the amount of $41,989.20.

On June 28, 2011, the City Council adopted Resolution 2011-88 approving Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement to extend the MOU for a period of one year and altering the MOU’s Club responsibilities and City Responsibilities and approving a fee waiver for fiscal year 2011/12 in the amount of $46,353.85.

On June 26, 2012, the City Council adopted Resolution 2012-96 approving Amendment No. 2 to the Agreement to extend the MOU for a period of one year and altering the MOU’s Club responsibilities and City Responsibilities and approving a fee waiver for fiscal year 2012/13 in the amount of $46,343.05.

On June 25, 2013, the City Council adopted Resolution 2013-84 approving Amendment No. 3 to the Agreement to extend the MOU for a period of one year and altering the MOU’s Club responsibilities and City Responsibilities and approving a fee waiver for fiscal year 2013/14 in the amount of $41,673.95.

On June 24, 2014, the City Council adopted Resolution 2014-82 approving Amendment No. 4 to the Agreement to extend the MOU for a period of one year and altering the MOU’s Club responsibilities and City Responsibilities and approving a fee waiver for fiscal year 2014/15 in the amount of $75,549.50 On June 23, 2015, the City Council adopted Resolution 2015-92 approving Amendment No. 5 to the Agreement to extend the MOU for a period of one year and altering the MOU’s Club responsibilities and City Responsibilities and approving a fee waiver for fiscal year 2015/16 in the amount of $81,328.40.

On May 10, 2016, the City Council adopted Resolution 2016-50 approving Amendment No. 6 to the Agreement to extend the MOU for a period of one year and altering the MOU’s Club responsibilities and City Responsibilities and approving a fee waiver for fiscal year 2016/17 in the amount of $81,509.40.

On June 13, 2017, the City Council adopted Resolution 2017-76 approving Amendment No. 7 to the Agreement to extend the MOU for a period of one year

Page 231 of 950 ends

and altering the MOU’s Club responsibilities and City Responsibilities and approving a fee waiver for fiscal year 2017/18 in the amount of $92,982.40 On May 8, 2018, the City Council adopted Resolution 2018-42 approving and authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute Amendment No. 8 to extend and amend the Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Brentwood and the Brentwood Senior Citizens Club, Inc., regarding running a wide variety of programs, activities, and services at the Brentwood Senior Activity Center and approving a fee waiver for fiscal year 2018/19 in the amount of $96,394.85.

On June 25, 2019, the City Council adopted Resolution 2019-76 approving and authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute Amendment No. 9 to extend and amend the Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Brentwood and the Brentwood Senior Citizens Club, Inc., regarding running a wide variety of programs, activities, and services at the Brentwood Senior Activity Center and approving a fee waiver for fiscal year 2019/20 in the amount of $99,894.85.

On June 23, 2020, the City Council adopted Resolution 2020-82 approving and authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute a Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Brentwood and the Brentwood Senior Citizens Club, Inc. for running a wide variety of programs, activities, and services at City facilities and approving a fee waiver for fiscal year 2020/21 not to exceed $99,894.85.

On May 11, 2021, the City Council adopted Resolution 2021-47 approving and authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute a Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Brentwood and the Brentwood Senior Citizens Club, Inc. for running a wide variety of programs, activities, and services at City facilities and approving a fee waiver for fiscal year 2021/22 not to exceed $99,894.85.

On May 24, 2022, the City Council adopted Resolution 2022-63 approving and authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute a Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Brentwood and the Brentwood Senior Citizens Club, Inc. for running a wide variety of programs, activities, and services at City facilities and approving a fee waiver for fiscal years 2022/23 and 2023/24.

Page 232 of 950 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 2025-XX

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

BRENTWOOD TO APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY

MANAGER OR DESIGNEE TO EXECUTE A MEMORANDUM OF

UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE CITY OF BRENTWOOD AND
THE BRENTWOOD SENIOR CITIZENS CLUB, INC. FOR RUNNING

A WIDE VARIETY OF PROGRAMS, ACTIVITIES, AND SERVICES

AT CITY FACILITIES, AND APPROVING A FEE WAIVER FOR
FISCAL YEARS 2025/26, 2026/27 AND 2027/28 IN AN
AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $100,000 PER FISCAL YEAR
WHEREAS, on June 22, 2010, City Council adopted Resolution 2010-86, approving a MOU between the City of Brentwood and the Brentwood Senior Citizen’s Club, Inc. (the “Club”) regarding running a wide variety of programs, activities, and services at the Brentwood Senior Activity Center and approving a fee waiver for fiscal year 2010/11 in the amount of $41,989.20; and WHEREAS, on June 28, 2011, the City Council adopted Resolution 2011-88, approving Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement to extend the MOU for a period of one year and altering the MOU’s Club responsibilities and City Responsibilities and approving a fee waiver for fiscal year 2011/12 in the amount of $46,353.85; and WHEREAS, on June 26, 2012, the City Council adopted Resolution 2012-96, approving Amendment No. 2 to the Agreement to extend the MOU for a period of one year and altering the MOU’s Club responsibilities and City Responsibilities and approving a fee waiver for fiscal year 2012/13 in the amount of $46,343.05; and WHEREAS, on June 25, 2013, the City Council adopted Resolution 2013-84, approving Amendment No. 3 to the Agreement to extend the MOU for a period of one year and altering the MOU’s Club responsibilities and City Responsibilities and approving a fee waiver for fiscal year 2013/14 in the amount of $41,673.95; and WHEREAS, on June 24, 2014, the City Council adopted Resolution 2014-82, approving Amendment No. 4 to the Agreement to extend the MOU for a period of one year and altering the MOU’s Club responsibilities and City Responsibilities and approving a fee waiver for fiscal year 2014/15 in the amount of $75,549.50; and WHEREAS, on June 23, 2015, the City Council adopted Resolution 2015-92, approving Amendment No. 5 to the Agreement to extend the MOU for a period of one year and altering the MOU’s Club responsibilities and City Responsibilities and approving a fee waiver for fiscal year 2015/16 in the amount of $81,328.40; and WHEREAS, on May 10, 2016, the City Council adopted Resolution 2016-50, approving Amendment No. 6 to the Agreement to extend the MOU for a period of one year and altering the MOU’s Club responsibilities and City Responsibilities and approving a fee waiver for fiscal year 2016/17 in the amount of $81,509.40; and

Page 233 of 950 ends
← All documents from this meeting