Brentwood City Council
May 27, 2025

WHEREAS, on June 13, 2017, the City Council adopted Resolution 2017-76, approving Amendment No. 7 to the Agreement to extend the MOU for a period of one year and altering the MOU’s Club responsibilities and City Responsibilities and approving a fee waiver for fiscal year 2017/18 in the amount of $92,982.40; and WHEREAS, on May 8, 2018, the City Council adopted Resolution 2018- 42, approving and authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute Amendment No. 8 to extend and amend the Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Brentwood and the Club regarding running a wide variety of programs, activities, and services at the Brentwood Senior Activity Center and approving a fee waiver for fiscal year 2018/19 in the amount of $96,394.85; and WHEREAS, on June 25, 2019, the City Council adopted Resolution 2019- 76, approving and authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute Amendment No. 9 to extend and amend the Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Brentwood and the Club regarding running a wide variety of programs, activities, and services at the Brentwood Senior Activity Center and approving a fee waiver for fiscal year 2019/20 in the amount of $99,894.85; and WHEREAS, on June 23, 2020, the City Council adopted Resolution 2020-82, approving and authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute the Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Brentwood and the Club for running a wide variety of programs, activities, and services at City facilities and approving a fee waiver for fiscal year 2020/21 not to exceed $99,894.85; and WHEREAS, on May 11, 2021, the City Council adopted Resolution 2021-47, approving and authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute the Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Brentwood and the Club for running a wide variety of programs, activities, and services at City facilities and approving a fee waiver for fiscal year 2021/22 not to exceed $99,894.85; and WHEREAS, on May 24, 2022, the City Council adopted Resolution 2022-63, approving and authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute the Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Brentwood and the Club for running a wide variety of programs, activities, and services at City facilities and approving a fee waiver for fiscal year 2022/23 – 2023/24 not to exceed $98,311.13; and
WHEREAS, for the next three fiscal years, the City desires to continue its support of the Club and the various programs, activities, and services available to all seniors in the City of Brentwood; and
WHEREAS, staff has confirmed that the fee waivers adhere to Council Administrative Policy 10-12; and

WHEREAS, the Parties desire to continue their relationship and have set forth their respective roles and obligations in the MOU attached hereto and incorporated herein; and
WHEREAS, the Parties have negotiated and agreed to the responsibilities in Exhibits A, B and C of the MOU.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Brentwood hereby approves and authorizes the City Manager or designee to execute the Memorandum of Understanding between the City and the Brentwood Senior Citizens Club, Inc. for running a wide variety of programs, activities, and services at City facilities, and approving a fee waiver for fiscal years 2025/26, 2026/27 and 2027/28 in an amount not to exceed $100,000 per fiscal year.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Brentwood at a regular meeting held on the 27th day of May, 2025 by the following vote:

1 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING

BETWEEN
THE BRENTWOOD SENIOR CITIZENS CLUB, INC.

AND THE CITY OF BRENTWOOD
This Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”) is entered this ____ day of _____________ 2025, and effective on July 1, 2025 (“Effective Date”), by and between the City of Brentwood, a municipal corporation of the State of California ("City"), and Brentwood Senior Citizens Club, Inc., a 501(c)(3) non-profit corporation in the state of California (“Club") (each a Party, and collectively, the “Parties”) for running a wide variety of programs, activities, and services.

RECITALS
A. Since approximately June 2008, the Parties have entered into multiple memoranda of understanding and amendments for the use of City facilities to enable the running of a wide variety of senior citizen programs, activities, and services.

B. The current memoranda of understanding runs through June 30, 2025 and the Parties desire to continue their relationship by entering into this MOU.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AGREED by the Parties as follows:

1. Responsibilities of the Club. Along with the terms and conditions of this MOU, the Club agrees to be responsible for and complete those items set forth in the attached Exhibit “A,” which is incorporated into this MOU, by this reference. Club further agrees to be bound to the City Facility Rental Rules and Regulations set forth in the attached Exhibit “C,” which is incorporated into this MOU, by this reference.

1. Responsibilities of the City. Along with the terms and conditions of this MOU, the City agrees to be responsible for and complete those items set forth in the attached Exhibit “B”, which is incorporated into this MOU, by this reference.

3. Relationship of the Parties. The Club is free from the control and direction of the City, in pursuit of the Club’s independent calling, and not as an employee of the City. It is understood that this is a MOU by and between independent contractors and is not intended to, and will not be construed to, create the relationship of agent, servant, employee, partnership, joint venture or association, or any other relationship whatsoever other than that of independent contractor. Any persons used by Club to provide services under this MOU will not be considered employees of City for any purposes whatsoever.

4. Term. This MOU will commence on the Effective Date and, unless terminated earlier pursuant to this Agreement, will terminate June 30, 2028.

5. Payment. For the term of this MOU, the City Council will consider waiving facility fees only as they relate to this MOU, in accordance with City Council/Administrative Policy 10-12 (Policy and Procedures for requests for Use of City Funds) (“Policy 10-12”), and as more explicitly outlined in Exhibits “A” and “B,” in an amount not to exceed $100,000 per fiscal year (July 1 – June 30). Club will be responsible for application fees, deposits, cleaning fees and staff costs for any additional programs, activities, and services not identified in this MOU, or as provided for in Exhibits “A” or “B.” City will invoice Club quarterly for the fees identified in Exhibits “A” and “B.”

2 6. Indemnity. Except as to the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the Club, City will defend, indemnify and hold the Club, its officers, agents, volunteers and employees, harmless from any and all loss, damage, claims, demands, liability, expense or cost, including reasonable attorneys’ fees, which arises out of, or is in any way connected with the performance of, the services by City or any of City’s employees, agents, volunteers or subcontractors, notwithstanding that the Club may have benefited from their services.

Except as to the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the City, Club will defend, indemnify and hold the City, its officers, agents, volunteers and employees, harmless from any and all loss, damage, claims, demands, liability, expense or cost, including reasonable attorneys’ fees, which arises out of, or is in any way connected with the performance of, the services by Club or any of Club’s employees, agents, volunteers or subcontractors, notwithstanding that the City may have benefited from their services.

The duty of the Parties to indemnify and save harmless as set forth herein, will include the duty to defend as set forth in Section 2778 of the California Civil Code. This Section 6 will survive the expiration of this MOU.

7. Insurance. Each Party will maintain comprehensive general liability insurance in the amount of two million dollars ($2,000,000) combined single limit to protect the Parties, their officers, volunteers, employees and agents against claims for bodily injury, and property damage arising from any Party’s participation in the activities described herein. The form of such insurance will be satisfactory to each Party and may include self-insurance at levels acceptable to all Parties.

Each Party’s policy or policies will name the other Party as an additional insured. This Section 7 will survive the expiration of this MOU.

8. Non-discrimination. The Parties will comply with all applicable local, state and federal laws and regulations prohibiting discrimination and harassment.

9. Entire Agreement. This MOU and its Exhibits “A,” “B,” and “C” contain the entire understanding and agreement of the Parties, and all oral or written representations, understandings or agreements are expressly stated in this MOU. In case of a conflict between the terms of this MOU and any Exhibit attached, the terms of this MOU will prevail. No testimony or evidence of any such representations, understandings, or covenants will be admissible in any proceeding of any kind or nature to interpret or determine the terms or conditions of this MOU.

10. Amendments. Changes to the terms and conditions of this MOU will be made only by written amendment signed by the Parties.

11. Notices. All notices with respect to this MOU will be given in writing by first class mail to the Parties, or to such other persons’ addresses or telephone numbers as the Parties may designate in writing from time to time, as follows:

City: City of Brentwood
Attention: Lindsay Pinell, Recreation Supervisor
150 City Park Way
Brentwood, CA 94513
Club: Brentwood Senior Citizens Club, Inc.

Attention: Board President

3 PO Box 1778
Brentwood, CA 94513-8778
Notice will be deemed effective on the date personally delivered or, if mailed, 3 days after depositing it in the United States Mail. Club must notify City within 14 days of any change to its mailing address.

12. Termination. Either Party may terminate this MOU at any time after a discussion and delivery of written notice to the other Party, with such termination effective immediately. In the event of termination any unexpended funds will be returned to the Party that has contributed them.

13. Assignment. Neither Party will assign any right or obligation pursuant to this MOU without the written consent of the other Party. Any attempted or purported assignment without the written consent of the other Party will be void and of no effect.

14. Third Parties. This MOU does not confer any benefits to any third party.

15. Jurisdiction and Venue. Any action at law or in equity brought under this MOU for the purpose of enforcing a right or rights provided for by this MOU will be tried in a court of competent jurisdiction in the County of Contra Costa, State of California, and the Parties waive all provisions of law providing for a change of venue in these proceedings to any other county.

16. Pandemic Health Laws. The Club agrees to comply with all local, state, or federal laws that have been or may be enacted in response to the COVID-19 pandemic (collectively, “Health Laws”), which include all of the County of Contra Costa Health Orders. Failure to fully comply with the Health Laws constitutes a material default, subject to all available remedies including suspension or termination of the MOU.

17. Paragraph Headings. Paragraph headings are used for convenience only and will not be deemed to be a part of such paragraphs and will not be construed to change the meaning of the paragraphs.

18. No Waiver. Waiver by either Party of any default, breach or condition precedent of this MOU will not be construed as a waiver of any other default, breach or condition precedent or of any other right under this MOU.

19. Severability. If any term, provision, covenant, or condition of this MOU is ruled invalid, void, or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, this MOU will nonetheless remain in full force and effect as to all remaining terms, provisions, covenants, and conditions.

20. Maintenance of Records. Club will maintain complete and accurate records with respect to costs incurred under this MOU from the date of execution of this MOU through six months after termination of this MOU. All records will be clearly identifiable. Club will provide City with an account statement in accordance with non-profit funding no later than the thirty (30) days after the termination date set forth in Section 4 above. The account statement shall include categorized revenues and expenditures and contributions made to local service and non-profit organizations.

4 21. Post-Evaluation Report. No later than August 1
st each year, the Club and City shall
send a written post-evaluation report (“Report”) to the other party that evaluates the events of the preceding year.

22. Signatures.

22.1 Counterparts. This MOU may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of which together will be deemed an original, but all of which together will constitute the same instrument.

22.2 Digital/Electronic Signatures. Using a City-approved method, this MOU may be executed through the use of digital or electronic signatures in accordance with Government Code Section 16.5. The presence of an electronic signature on this MOU will be construed as the Parties’ consent to do business electronically.

23. Authority. The individuals executing this MOU represent and warrant that they have the right, power, legal capacity and authority to enter into and to execute this MOU on behalf of the respective legal entities of the Parties.

Brentwood Senior Citizens Club, Inc.:

By:

Richard Griek, Board President
City of Brentwood:

By:

Darin Gale, Interim City Manager
ATTEST:

By:

Amanda McVey, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

By:

Katherine Wisinski, City Attorney

5 Exhibit A
Club Responsibilities

1. Administration:

A. The Club, its Board of Directors (“Board”) and its appointed representatives are solely responsible for administrative record keeping. This responsibility includes, but is not limited to, the development and revision of the following key functions and documents:
 Club Articles of Incorporation: The Club has the sole responsibility for all Club Articles of Incorporation as per State and Federal rules and guidelines. The Club will provide a copy to the City upon request.
 Club Bylaws: The Club has the sole responsibility for all bylaws of the Club which includes regular or as needed revisions. The Club will provide a copy to the City upon request.
 Club Monthly Financial Statements/Records: The Club has the sole responsibility for all financial monthly reports and records, including the annual filing of Federal, State and City required documents including State Raffle Permits and City Bingo permits.

Failure to file such documents and maintain 501(c)3 non-profit status will result in the termination of this MOU.
 Club Elections/Directors: The Club has sole responsibility for all aspects of the Club Board elections, including selection of the slate of officers, ballot preparation and mailing, ballot collection, ballot counting, and verification of ballot results as defined in the Club Bylaws. Ballots cannot be mailed to or dropped off at City facilities.  The Club has the sole responsibility to maintain its own mailing address and, as is further detailed in section 11 of the MOU, to notify the City of any address changes in writing within 14 days of the change. The Club may not use any City facility address to receive mail or deliveries.
 Club Board Meetings: The Club has the sole responsibility for all aspects of its Board meetings including: scheduling, drafting and posting agendas, taking minutes, and preparing Board packets.
 The Club has the sole responsibility to ensure that its members adhere to the Brentwood Senior Activity Center - Code of Conduct, and the Club must enforce the Code of Conduct as well.

2. Membership:

The Club is responsible for determining annual membership dues/fees including what, if any, rights and/or privileges are associated with Club membership. The Club is solely responsible for membership drives and renewal reminders. Club memberships are valid for one calendar year from January 1st (or date of purchase if after January 1st) through December 31. Club members will sign a Club participation waiver annually, upon

6 registration or re-registration. A copy of the membership application and waiver will be added to the membership binder stored at the Brentwood Senior Activity Center (“BSAC”). Only current calendar year membership applications and waivers will be stored at BSAC. The Club is responsible for storing and retaining previous year membership records including applications and waivers. No other records may be stored at City Facilities except as expressly stated in this MOU.

3. Excursions:

The Club is responsible for excursions. This includes: the selection of individual excursion destinations, execution of travel agency contracts, direct supervision during the actual excursion, selection of Club volunteers, and vendor payments, charges and insurance as they relate to each of the individual excursion(s). The Club is responsible for all excursion participant communication including trip reminders. The Club is responsible for addressing any incidents, accidents and code of conduct issues that occur on excursions.

4. Fundraising:

The Club is primarily responsible for the selection, development, and implementation of all of its fundraising activities. This includes the completion of all administrative requests, forms, permits, and/or payment of various fees/charges required by the City and/or other County and State agencies, as necessary. All event activity contracts will be signed/initialed by the Club President or Vice President. The Club is responsible for recruitment and training of volunteers who assist in all Club sponsored fundraising activities.

5. Promotional Materials/Newsletters/Flyers:

A. The Club is responsible for creating, printing and disseminating Club outreach and promotional efforts. This includes all flyers, posters and the Club Senior Newsletter.

Upon request, the City will provide program information to the Club for use in its promotional efforts. The Club is responsible for abiding by Fee Waiver policies in accordance with City Council/Administrative Policy No 10-12, as that Policy may be amended from time to time. This includes appropriate recognition of the City as a cosponsor or partner of Club activities on all Club promotional materials. All promotional materials representing the City must follow the City graphic standards guidelines and be approved by the Recreation Manager.

B. As it relates to marketing of individual Club sponsored programs and activities, the Club is responsible for providing the City with information the Club would like promoted at least six weeks in advance of the program/event date.

6. Programs/Services:

The Club is responsible for all aspects of the below programs, activities, and services as noted, subject to annual review and revision by the Parties; in some instances, when agreed to in advance, the City may provide set up and clean up. Relocation of activities will be communicated to the Board at least 30 calendar days prior to the activity start date. However, in the event an unforeseen situation were to require City to relocate an activity, City will provide as much notice as possible given the circumstances. The Club

7 is responsible for addressing any incidents, accidents and code of conduct issues that occur during Club programs/services.

In order to register participants through ACTIVE, City staff must enter the program/service into the software program. The Club will provide full program/event details to the City at least six weeks in advance of the activity/event start date.

Programs/Activities
 Club Newsletter - creating, printing and disseminating to members  Administration of the scholarship program
 Social/Fundraising Events/Special Events
 Featured Events, Monthly Dances
 Older American Month (May)
 BBQ
 Ice Cream Social
 Cultural Events
 Trips & Tours
 Holiday Craft Faire (if applicable)
 Spring Fling Craft Faire
 New Year’s Eve
 Volunteer Appreciation Event
 Single Mingle
 Book Club Banter
 Bunco Night
 Special Monthly Luncheon
 Movie Fridays, monthly
 New Club Member mixers
 Volunteer recruitment events
 Club Volunteer training
 Weekly Activities
 Monday Bingo
 Drop-in Pinochle
 Drop-in Gin Rummy
 Drop-in Mahjong
 Drop-in Billiards
 Book and Media Center
 Technology Lab
 Drop-in art studio space for A Place to Paint and
 Ballet Folklorico
 Line Dancing
 Knitting and Crocheting Circle
 Quilters Club
Additional senior programs, activities, and/or services may be added during the term of this MOU with approval by the Board President and the City Director of Parks and Recreation or designee.

8 The Club is responsible for paying all processing and transaction fees incurred by the City for processing Club activity registrations through ACTIVE software. These fees are set by ACTIVE and are subject to change. The City will provide the Club with an accounting of the processing and transaction fees with the regular quarterly payment intervals.

7. Use of City Facilities:

The Club will submit its annual calendar by October 31 of the year prior to use. If additional space is needed after the calendar is submitted, rental requests must be submitted no less than 90 days in advance. Additional space request approvals will be based on availability and could be subject to applicable usage fees. Requests for additional fee waivers will require submission of a City Request for Fee Waiver and/or Fee Reduction/Donation Application by the Club.

City agrees to provide the use of City facilities for the activities listed in paragraph 6 of this Exhibit “A”. Club is required to adhere to all City Facility Rental Rules & Regulations included in Exhibit “C.” If approved by the City Council, the City will waive rental fees via the City Fee Waiver process in accordance with Policy No 10-12.

For special events outside of normal BSAC or Brentwood Community Center (“BCC”) operating hours, the Club is responsible for payment of cleaning and staff costs as these items are hard costs that cannot be waived. These costs will be determined in accordance with the City’s Cost Allocation Plan and Schedule of City Fees at the Recreational Leader III, Step E salary hourly rate which can be found at www.brentwoodca.gov.

Unless explicitly stated otherwise, the Club and Board may not store, retain, file, or save any personal or Club documents, materials, or goods at City Facilities. Special equipment to be stored at BSAC, include the following:
• Electronic/computerized Bingo Machine, Bingo equipment and supplies • Knitting/Quilters tables
• Game & card tables
• Electronic equipment for events

The Club is solely responsible for acquiring Alcohol Beverage Control Licenses as needed for Club events in accordance with Exhibit “C”. Required Police Department staff signature will be coordinated by the City. The Club is also solely responsible for obtaining any necessary food permits for events.

The Club is solely responsible for contracting security guards for all Club events serving alcohol, 1 security guard for every 60 people, and provide 1 security guard at Monday Bingo when capacity is above 75%. The security guard company must be registered and approved by the Brentwood Police Department and must have a valid Brentwood license.

See Exhibit “C” for further details.

9 Exhibit B
City Responsibilities

1. Administration:

A. The City will retain a backup copy of the following key documents as provided by the Club per Exhibit “A”:
 Club Articles of Incorporation
 Club Bylaws
 Club Insurance policy
 Bingo Permit
 Raffle Permit
 Security Services
B. Upon request, City staff will provide the Club with Club registration and enrollment information maintained in the ACTIVE database. Financial reporting includes the revenue due to the Club for activity registration and membership fees, as well as the processing and transactions fees due to the City.

2. Membership:

The City is responsible for the processing of Club membership annual fees. Membership dues collected by the City will be paid to the Club quarterly. The City will provide membership applications and waivers to be stored in a binder at BSAC.

3. Activity, Event and Excursion Registration:

The City is responsible for processing Club activity, event and excursion registrations including obtaining waivers. The Club will provide full activity/event/excursion details to the City at least six weeks in advance of the activity/event start date. The City staff will provide the Club with all excursion registration and waiver forms at least 24 hours before each excursion. The City will pay the Club the excursion registration fees, minus the actual processing and transaction fees charged by ACTIVE, quarterly.

4. Fundraising:

The City is available to provide planning guidance and event support for Club fundraising events. The Club will express the need for City staff at least 6 weeks prior to the event. If City staff is needed for Monday Bingo set-up, the Club will pay the City for staff-time calculated at 2 hours each for 2 Recreation Leader III, step E hourly rate, as identified in the City’s Cost Allocation Plan and Schedule of City Fees.

The City will coordinate with the Police Department to obtain the required Police Department staff signature on Alcohol Beverage Control Licenses as needed for Club events.

A joint discussion of any new proposed event shall occur prior to approval of new events.

10 5. Monthly Luncheons:

The City is responsible for providing staff support for the Club’s monthly luncheons. In partnership with the Café Costa program (administered by Meals on Wheels), the City is responsible for pre-event room set up that includes registration tables, raffle prize table, public address system and appropriate music, and pulling out the Club Bingo equipment.

6. Newsletters/Flyers:

The City is responsible for creation and dissemination of all City outreach and marketing efforts. This includes all activities, program and events at the Brentwood Senior Activity Center and the Brentwood Community Center. Upon request, the Club will provide its program information to the City for potential inclusion in City’s outreach and marketing efforts.

The City staff will print mailing labels for the Club at no charge within 48 hours of request.

Club will provide the mailing labels.

7. City Programs/Services:

The City is solely responsible for the below City recreation programs, activities, and services (except where a partnership is noted), which includes scheduling, promotion, staffing, and registration. The Club will not receive payment for any City run program including, but not necessarily limited to, the following:
 Special Community Presentations/Events
 Oldies but Goodies Program
 Duplicate Bridge
 Tai Chi
 Special Events
 Liberty Adult Education classes, programs and services  Senior Bocce and Cornhole Leagues
 Blood Pressure Checks
 Senior Legal Services
 Care Manager Program
 Memory Testing
 HICAP
 Senior Resource Fair
 Scam Stoppers
 Caregivers Workshop
 Educational Workshops
 Public Art Wall Exhibit (in partnership with the Arts Commission and Liberty Adult Education)
 Café Costa (in partnership with Meals on Wheels)
 Brown Bag Program (in partnership with Food Bank of Contra Costa and Solano)  Friday Game Day

11 The City may add programs, services and events at any time based on the following priority:

BSAC Order of Priority of Use

1. City programs

2. County programs

3. Brentwood Senior Citizens Club

4. Organizations serving Brentwood seniors

5. Brentwood Residents

8. City Facilities:

The City will be responsible for custodial and maintenance of the BSAC and BCC at no cost to the Club unless explicitly stated otherwise. The City will also provide building set up at the beginning of each day as pre-arranged with the Club. Additional building set up requirements during the course of the day are subject to the availability of City staff. The City reserves the right to relocate, reschedule, or cancel any activities scheduled at a City facility. City will provide as much notice as possible to Club if an activity needs to be relocated, rescheduled, or canceled. However, City reserves the right to relocate, reschedule, or cancel activities with minimal notice in the event an unforeseen situation were to arise.

The City is responsible for daily operations of City facilities. This includes:

1. Opening and closing City facilities.

2. Providing LiveScan for all City staff and City volunteers.

3. Training for all City staff and City volunteers including Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR), First Aid (FA) and use of Automated External Defibrillator (AED).

4. Staffing of front counter/receptions desks.

Any activity, function or service not specifically mentioned in Exhibits “A” or “B” is the responsibility of the Club which can be changed upon a separate written agreement between the Parties.

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO. E.13
05/27/2025
SUBJECT: BART Park and Ride Letter of Opposition
DEPARTMENT: City Manager
STAFF: Darin Gale, Interim City Manager

TITLE/RECOMMENDATION
Consideration of authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to sign a Letter of Opposition to the Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) Board of Directors requesting the continued use of the BART-owned parcel at 3980 Walnut Boulevard in Brentwood as a Park & Ride facility.

FISCAL IMPACT
None at this time.

BACKGROUND
One of the most critical mobility challenges for East County residents is access to BART. As the easternmost city in Contra Costa County, Brentwood relies heavily on first- and last-mile transit connections to link the Brentwood community to the greater Bay Area. Tri Delta Transit plays an essential role in fulfilling this need— particularly through its operations at the Brentwood Park & Ride located at 3980 Walnut Boulevard.

This site serves as a key transit hub for residents of Brentwood and the surrounding communities. It acts as a terminus for approximately 30% of Tri Delta Transit’s fixedroute services and is a designated future stop for their Tri MyRide on-demand service.

Importantly, it also provides essential connections to the Antioch BART station, which remains the closest heavy rail link for Brentwood residents.

The Brentwood Park & Ride supports the regional goal of reducing automobile dependency by providing a viable alternative to one of the most congested corridors in the country—Highway 4. The facility’s importance extends beyond transportation; it is a vital public resource serving a high concentration of low-income residents who

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO. E.13
05/27/2025
rely on public transit for work, education, medical appointments, and other critical daily needs.

It is City staff’s understanding that BART staff planed to present an informational item to the Board on April 10, 2025, regarding the future use of several BART-owned parcels, including the one at 3980 Walnut Boulevard. Given the Brentwood site's central role in our regional transportation network and its importance to equity in transit access, staff requests approval to submit a letter to the BART Board of Directors to urge them to maintain the current use of the property as a Park & Ride facility.

ALTERNATIVE OPTION(S)

1. Do not approve staff’s recommendation to submit a Letter of Opposition.

ATTACHMENT(S)

1. Draft Letter to BART

MAILING ADDRESS:

City Hall
150 City Park Way
Brentwood, CA 94513
Phone: 925.516.5400
Fax: 925.516.5401
www.brentwoodca.gov

CITY MANAGER
150 City Park Way
Phone: 925.516.5440
Fax: 925.516.5441

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
150 City Park Way
Phone: 925.516.5405
Fax: 925.516.5407

FINANCE AND

INFORMATION SYSTEMS
150 City Park Way
Phone: 925.516.5460
Fax: 925.516.5401

HUMAN RESOURCES
150 City Park Way
Phone: 925.516.5191
Fax: 925.516.5446

PARKS AND RECREATION
150 City Park Way
Phone: 925.516.5444
Fax: 925.516.5445
POLICE
9100 Brentwood Boulevard
Phone: 925.634.6911
24 Hr. Dispatch: 925.809.7911
Fax: 925.809.7799

PUBLIC WORKS
Engineering Division
150 City Park Way
Phone: 925.516.5420
Fax: 925.516.5421
Operations Division
2201 Elkins Way
Phone: 925.516.6000
Fax: 925.516.6001
May 22, 2025
The Honorable Mark Foley
President, Board of Directors
San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District (BART)
2150 Webster Street
Oakland, CA 94612
President Foley,
On behalf of the City of Brentwood, I would like to thank you for your continued service and leadership in supporting regional transit access for the residents of Contra Costa County. We recognize the complex challenges BART faces and sincerely appreciate your ongoing commitment to improving mobility throughout the Bay Area.

One of the most critical mobility challenges for East County residents is access to BART. As the easternmost city in Contra Costa County, Brentwood relies heavily on first- and last-mile transit connections to link our community to the greater Bay Area. Tri Delta Transit plays an essential role in fulfilling this need—particularly through its operations at the Brentwood Park & Ride located at 3980 Walnut Boulevard.

As you are aware, this site serves as a key transit hub for residents of Brentwood and the surrounding communities. It acts as a terminus for approximately 30% of Tri Delta Transit’s fixed-route services and is a designated future stop for their Tri MyRide on-demand service. Importantly, it also provides essential connections to the Antioch BART station, which remains the closest heavy rail link for our residents.

The Brentwood Park & Ride supports the regional goal of reducing automobile dependency by providing a viable alternative to one of the most congested corridors in the country—Highway 4. The facility’s importance extends beyond transportation; it is a vital public resource serving a high concentration of lowincome residents who rely on public transit for work, education, medical appointments, and other critical daily needs.

It is our understanding that BART staff planned to present an informational item to the Board on April 10, 2025, regarding the future use of several BARTowned parcels, including the one at 3980 Walnut Boulevard. Given the Brentwood site's central role in our regional transportation network and its importance to equity in transit access, we respectfully urge the BART Board to maintain the current use of the property as a Park & Ride facility.

We welcome the opportunity to work collaboratively with BART and Tri Delta Transit to identify long-term solutions that support both regional transit goals and the needs of Brentwood residents. I look forward to upcoming conversations with BART staff, including Mr. Powers, to explore mutually beneficial strategies for this essential site.

Thank you again for your leadership and your attention to this important matter.

Sincerely,
Darin Gale
Interim City Manager
City of Brentwood

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO. F.1
05/27/2025
SUBJECT: Consideration of actions pertaining to the City’s Landscape and Lighting Assessment Districts, including Landscape and Lighting Assessment District No. 19-3 and No. 21-1, and the Citywide Park Maintenance District No. 98-1 for Fiscal Year 2025/26
DEPARTMENT: Parks and Recreation
STAFF: Vatsal Patel, Interim Parks and Recreation Director Aaron Wanden, Parks Maintenance Manager

TITLE/RECOMMENDATION
Hold a public hearing and adopt a Resolution approving the City of Brentwood’s sixtyeight (68) Landscape & Lighting Assessment Districts (“LLADs”), Landscape & Lighting Assessment District No. 19-3, Landscape & Lighting Assessment District No. 21-1, and Citywide Park Maintenance District No. 98-1 Engineer’s Reports for Fiscal year 2025/26; ordering improvements; confirming the diagram and assessments; levying and collecting assessments; amending the Fiscal Year 2025/26 Operating Budget; and finding that the above actions are exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act.

FISCAL IMPACT
For Fiscal Year 2025/26, it is anticipated that the City will collect assessments for the operation, maintenance, and replacement of public improvements associated with the following:

LLADs (including 19-3 and 21-1) $ 11,588,678
Citywide Park Maintenance District $ 3,916,262
The City is required to make contributions to the LLADs for the portion of the costs that represent general benefits to the public at large. In addition, the City’s General Fund makes contributions to certain LLADs for which the revenue collected is not sufficient for the operation and maintenance of the improvements.

The FY 2025/26 General Fund Operating Budget includes the following transfers out for the operation, maintenance, and required general benefit contribution:

LLADs (including 19-3 and 21-1) $ 2,187,215

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO. F.1
05/27/2025
Parks and LLAD Replacement Fund $ 154,500
In addition, the General Fund Operating Budget includes budget for the operation and maintenance of the Brentwood Family Aquatic Center (BFAC). This amount is included in the required general benefit contribution by the City.

BFAC Division Operating Budget $ 1,499,578
To ensure the Districts are self-supporting, each has had an administrative cost factored into the maximum assessment rate during formation, to cover preparation of annual Engineer’s Reports and levying of assessments.

In addition, adoption of this resolution will amend the Fiscal Year 2025/26 Operating Budgets for the Landscape and Lighting Assessment Districts, Landscape and Lighting Assessment District 19-3, Landscape and Lighting Assessment District 21-1, and the Citywide Park Assessment District No. 98-1, including revenues, appropriations, and transfers as detailed in the Final Engineer’s Reports.

BACKGROUND
In order to fund certain public improvements, cities often designate particular areas within their city limits as “Landscape and Lighting Assessment Districts.” Properties within the boundaries of each such district are assessed a charge to help offset the cost of things like the installation and maintenance of landscaping, statues, fountains, general lighting, traffic lights, recreational and playground courts and equipment, and public restrooms. The Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (the “1972 Act”, codified at Streets and Highways Code §§ 22500, et seq.) and Proposition 218 require that parcels within a landscape and lighting assessment district (“LLAD”) only be assessed for the special benefits conferred on property from eligible public improvements.

Proposition 218 further requires the City to identify the benefits to each property, and then separate and quantify the special benefits from the general benefits to the public at large. Any costs associated with general benefits and benefit to property not within an assessment district must be funded by the City.

Given this requirement, the City conducted a benefit analysis of various improvement types to determine which properties benefit from each improvement and the City’s share of the cost. In addition to continuing to fund operations and maintenance associated with the Brentwood Family Aquatic Center, the City is budgeted to contribute an estimated $2.44 million in Fiscal Year 2025/26, fulfilling the City’s benefit requirement for Fiscal Year 2025/26. This contribution amount is similar to

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO. F.1
05/27/2025
amounts contributed by the City in prior years to pay for the operation, maintenance, and replacement of public improvements associated with the Landscape & Lighting Assessment Districts and Citywide Park Maintenance District.

Additionally, the 1972 Act requires an annual review and an updated Engineer’s Report be prepared to set assessment rates for the ensuing fiscal year. In addition, any new LLAD, or any annexation of additional property into an existing LLAD also requires an Engineer’s Report to be generated.

The annual Engineer’s Report for LLAD No. 19-3 is prepared under separate cover from the Consolidated Engineer’s Report for the City’s other 68 LLADs due to the inclusion of multiple benefit zones within that LLAD. Likewise, the annual Engineer’s Report for LLAD No. 21-1 is prepared under separate cover from the Consolidated Engineer’s Report for the City’s other 68 LLADs due to the assessment being comprised of the following two components:
1) the Construction Component, which provides funding for the construction of the new landscape improvements and will be assessed to property within Landscape & Lighting Assessment District No. 21-1 over a period of 10 years in equal annual installments with no interest, which commenced in Fiscal Year 2022-23 and ends after Fiscal Year 2031-32; and
2) the Maintenance Component, which provides funding for the ongoing operation, maintenance, servicing, and replacement of the new landscape improvements, which commenced in Fiscal Year 2022-23 and will be assessed annually based on the maintenance budget each subsequent year.

The Final Engineer’s Reports contain 1) plans and specifications for the improvements, 2) estimates of the costs of the improvements, 3) diagrams of the assessment districts, 4) descriptions of the method of apportionment of the costs of the improvements to the benefiting parcels, and 5) property lists and assessment rolls.

The Fiscal Year 2025/26 assessments in the Consolidated Final Engineer’s Report for the LLADs, LLAD No. 19-3 Final Engineer’s Report, LLAD No. 21-1 Final Engineer’s Report, and the Citywide Park Maintenance District No. 98-1 Final Engineer’s Report will be assessed on the Fiscal Year 2025/26 tax roll and are calculated by considering all anticipated expenditures for maintenance, utilities, and administration.

Assessment rates may or may not change from fiscal year to fiscal year, dependent upon maintenance to be performed, but cannot exceed the maximum amount set

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO. F.1
05/27/2025
when the LLADs were originally formed, plus an annual cost of living adjustment.

The cost-of-living adjustment for Fiscal Year 2025/26 is the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers in the San Francisco Bay Area from December 2023 to December 2024, which was 2.08%. The maximum assessment rates are adjusted for Fiscal Year 2025/26 as follows:
1) The cost of living adjustment noted above (2.08%) will be applied to the maximum assessments in LLAD Nos. 94-1E, 94-1EC, 99-5, and 02-2 through 19-2, 21-2, 21-3, 23-1, 24-1, 24-2, 24-3, LLAD No. 19-3, the maintenance component of LLAD No. 21-1, and the Citywide Park Maintenance District No. 98-1.
2) LLAD Nos. 94-1N, 94-1S, 95-2 through 99-4, and 99-6 through 01-1 have a maximum cost of living increase of 2% each fiscal year and therefore the cost of living adjustment will be 2% for Fiscal Year 2025/26.

Thirty-one (31) of the sixty-eight (68) LLADs, as well as LLAD No. 19-3, LLAD No. 21-1, and Citywide Park Maintenance District No. 98-1, will be assessed at their Fiscal Year 2025/26 maximum authorized assessment rates as described above. The remaining thirty-seven (37) LLADs will be assessed below their maximum authorized assessment rates for Fiscal Year 2025/26 to adequately fund their respective operating budget and reserve.

As a part of the process, the 1972 Act requires that an Engineer’s Report must be filed, and a public hearing be held.

As noted in the Engineer’s Reports, the affected Landscape & Lighting Assessment Districts and Park District are as follows: No. 94-1 (Brentwood Country Club); No. 95-2 (Hawthorne Landing); No. 95-3 (Pheasant Run); No. 95-4 (Diablo Estates); No. 95-5 (California Spirit and Glory); No. 95-6 (Gerry Ranch); No. 95-7 (SPA D); No. 95-8 (Garin Ranch); No. 97-1 (Brentwood Lakes); No. 97-2 (Marsh Creek Apartments); No. 97-3 (Brentwood Park Apartments); No. 98-3 (Solana); No. 98-4 (Birchwood Estates); No. 98-5 (Arroyo Seco); No. 99-3 (SPA ‘L’); No. 99-4 (California Grove); No. 99-5 (Deer Ridge Country Club); No. 99-6 (Trailside); No. 99-7 (Termo); No. 99-8 (Gerry Property); No. 99-9 (Richmond American); No. 00-2 (Lyon Woodfield); No. 00-3 (California Orchard); No. 00-4 (Brentwood Park); No. 01-1 (Laird Project); No. 02-2 (Oakstreet); No. 02-3 (Apricot Way); No. 02-4 (Braddock & Logan); No. 02-5 (Sand Creek & Brentwood Blvd.); No. 02-6 (Balfour & John Muir); No. 02-7 (San Jose & Sand Creek); No. 02-8 (Lone Tree); No. 02-9 (Balfour Plaza);

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO. F.1
05/27/2025
No. 02-10 (Lone Tree Center); No. 02-11 (Lone Tree Plaza); No. 02-12 (Sunset Industrial); No. 02-13 (Stonehaven); No. 03-2 (Meritage Lone Tree); No. 03-3 (Brookdale Court); No. 03-4 (Tri City Plaza); No. 03-5 (West Summerset); No. 03-6 (Arbor Village); No. 03-7 (Garin Ranch Commercial); No. 03-8 (Blackhawk Commercial); No. 04-2 (Balfour-Griffith Commercial); No. 05-2 (South Brentwood Blvd. Commercial), No. 06-2 (Palmilla); No. 06-3 (Vineyards); No. 06-4 (Villa Amador); No. 06-5 (Barrington); No. 11-1 (North Brentwood Boulevard); No. 14-1 (Mission Grove); No. 14-2 (Ferro-Ronconi); No. 15-1 (Bella Fiore); No. 15-2 (Renaissance Estates); No. 16-1 (Bond Lane); No. 16-2 (Sellers); No. 17-1 (Sparrow); No. 17-2 (Catching’s Ranch); No. 17-3 (Cornerstone Fellowship); No. 19- 1 (Terrene); No. 19-2 (Alvernaz), No. 21-2 (Orchard Trails), No. 21-3 (Bennett Estates), No. 23-1 (Orchard Grove), No. 24-1 (Hanson Lane), No. 24-2 (Trumark Trailside), No. 24-3 (Inez Estates), No. 19-3 (Citywide and Local Maintenance Services), No. 21-1 (Deer Ridge Landscape Improvements),and the Citywide Park Maintenance District No. 98-1.

Staff recommends that the City Council hold the required public hearing, and adopt a Resolution approving the City of Brentwood’s 68 LLADs, LLAD No. 19-3, LLAD No. 21-1, and Citywide Park Maintenance District No. 98-1 Final Engineer’s Reports for Fiscal Year 2025/26; ordering improvements; confirming the diagram and assessments; levying and collecting assessments; and amending the Fiscal Year 2025/26 Operating Budget.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC INITIATIVE
Not applicable.

PREVIOUS ACTION
Previous Action by the City Council is included on Attachment 1.

DATE OF NOTICE
Notice of Public Hearing was published on May 16, 2025 in the Brentwood Press.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
The City’s action is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”, as codified at Public Resources Code §§ 21000, et seq., as further governed by the State CEQA Guidelines, 14 CCR §§ 15000, et seq.). This action

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO. F.1
05/27/2025
consists of initiation of proceedings for the levying of annual assessments for landscape, lighting, and park maintenance purposes and is within certain classes of projects that have been determined not to have a significant effect on the environment in that it meets the criteria set forth in sections 15273 (‘Rates, Tolls, Fares, and Charges’), 15301(c) (‘Existing Facilities’), and 15306 (‘Information Collection’) of the State CEQA Guidelines.

The item under consideration at the close of the Public Hearing is approval of the Fiscal Year 2025/26 Final Consolidated Engineer’s Report for the 68 LLADs, the Fiscal Year 2025/26 Final Engineer’s Report for LLAD No. 19-3, the Fiscal Year 2025/26 Final Engineer’s Report for LLAD No. 21-1, and the Fiscal Year 2025/26 Final Engineer’s Report for Citywide Park Maintenance District No. 98-1, and authorizing the levy of assessments for Fiscal Year 2025/26.

In addition, adoption of this resolution will amend the Fiscal Year 2025/26 Operating Budgets for the 68 LLADs, LLAD No. 19-3, LLAD No. 21-1, and the Citywide Park Maintenance District No. 98-1, including revenues, appropriations, and transfers as detailed in the Final Engineer’s Reports.

ALTERNATIVE OPTION(S)

1. Do not approve staff’s recommendation. Not approving these actions will result in the inability of the City to levy assessments in Fiscal Year 2025/26 to fund the operation, maintenance, and replacement of public improvements associated with the Landscape and Lighting Assessment Districts.

2. Continue item with direction for staff to return with additional information.

ATTACHMENT(S)

1. Previous Action

2. Resolution

3. Consolidated Final Engineer’s Report for 68 LLADs

4. Final Engineer’s Report LLAD No. 19-3 (Citywide & Local Maintenance Services)

5. Final Engineer’s Report LLAD No. 21-1 (Deer Ridge Landscape Improvements)

6. Final Engineer’s Report Citywide Park Maintenance District No. 98-1

PREVIOUS ACTION
Previous actions related to this agenda item that were taken by the Council are listed below. To view prior actions and materials, and Brentwood Municipal Code references in the staff report, as applicable:
 Visit www.brentwoodca.gov/meetings, and select the meeting date(s) desired to see the reference materials and videos.
 Visit www.brentwoodca.gov/municipalcode to research references to the Brentwood Municipal Code and search by the code section(s) cited.

Actions were taken in previous years to form the City’s sixty-eight (68) Landscape and Lighting Assessment Districts (“LLADs”), Landscape and Lighting Assessment District No. 19-3, Landscape and Lighting Assessment District No. 21-1, and Citywide Park Maintenance District No. 98-1. Engineer’s Reports setting the annual assessment rates have been approved each year by the City Council prior to finalizing the property tax roll with Contra Costa County and levying assessments.

On March 25, 2025, by Resolution No. 2025-30, the City Council adopted a resolution of initiation appointing Francisco and Associates as the Engineer of Work for the City’s LLADs, Landscape and Lighting Assessment District No. 19-3, Landscape and Lighting Assessment District No. 21-1, and Citywide Park Maintenance District No. 98-1; ordering the Engineer of Work to prepare and file the Engineer’s Reports for Fiscal Year 2025-26; and approving and authorizing the City Manager or his/her designee to execute a Professional Services Agreement with Francisco and Associates for a two-year term in an amount not to exceed $477,900, plus a 10% contingency, for assessment engineering services for Fiscal Years 2025/26 and 2026/27. In addition, the two-year agreement includes an option to extend the agreement for two additional one-year terms.

On May 13, 2025, by Resolution No. 2025-49, the City Council declared its intention to order improvements for the Landscape & Lighting Assessment Districts, Landscape & Lighting Assessment District No. 19-3, Landscape & Lighting Assessment District No. 21-1, and the Citywide Park Maintenance District No. 98-1 for Fiscal Year 2025/26; accepted the filing of the Preliminary Engineer’s Reports and set the date of May 27, 2025, as the Public Hearing date.

RESOLUTION NO. 2025-XX

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
BRENTWOOD APPROVING THE CITY OF BRENTWOOD’S
CONSOLIDATED ENGINEER’S REPORT FOR THE LANDSCAPE &
LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS, THE ENGINEER’S REPORT
FOR LANDSCAPE & LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 19-
3, THE ENGINEER’S REPORT FOR LANDSCAPE & LIGHTING
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 21-1, AND THE ENGINEER’S

REPORT FOR THE CITYWIDE PARK MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
NO. 98-1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025/26; ORDERING
IMPROVEMENTS; CONFIRMING THE DIAGRAMS AND
ASSESSMENTS; AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2025/26
OPERATING BUDGET; LEVYING AND COLLECTING
ASSESSMENTS; AND FINDING THAT THE ABOVE ACTIONS ARE

EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
ACT
WHEREAS, as required by Section 22622 of the California Streets and Highways Code, the City Council of the City of Brentwood, by approval of Resolution of Initiation No. 2025-30 has described any proposed improvements to be included for the determination of annual assessments levied for any assessment district created under the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; and ordered the preparation of an Engineer’s Report to determine the annual levy of assessments for any such district; and
WHEREAS, as required by Section 22623 of the California Streets and Highways Code, the Engineer of Work has filed the Consolidated Engineer’s Report for the Landscape & Lighting Assessment Districts, the Engineer’s Report for Landscape & Lighting Assessment District No. 19-3, the Engineer’s Report for Landscape & Lighting Assessment District No. 21-1, and the Engineer’s Report for the Citywide Park Maintenance District No. 98-1 for Fiscal Year 2025/26; and WHEREAS, as required by Section 22624 of the California Streets and Highways Code, the City Council of the City of Brentwood, by approval of Resolution No. 2025-___, has declared the intent to order the improvements described in the Engineer’s Reports for the City’s Landscape & Lighting Assessment Districts, Landscape & Lighting Assessment District No. 19-3, Landscape & Lighting Assessment District No. 21-1, and the Citywide Park Maintenance District No. 98-1 for Fiscal Year 2025/26, and set a date of May 27, 2025 for a Public Hearing; and WHEREAS, as required by Section 22631 of the California Streets and Highways Code, on May 27, 2025, the City Council of the City of Brentwood convened a Public Hearing and gave any interested person an opportunity to protest the assessments, for the Landscape & Lighting Assessment Districts, Landscape & Lighting District Assessment No. 19-3, Landscape & Lighting Assessment District No.

21-1, and the Citywide Park Maintenance District No. 98-1, either in writing or orally and determined that a majority protest had not been filed; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brentwood that:

1. It hereby approves the Final Consolidated Engineer’s Report for the Landscape & Lighting Assessment Districts, the Final Engineer’s Report for Landscape & Lighting Assessment District No. 19-3, the Final Engineer’s Report for Landscape & Lighting Assessment District No. 21-1, and the Final Engineer’s Report for the Citywide Park Maintenance District No. 98-1, for Fiscal Year 2025/26; and

2. It orders the maintenance of improvements and confirms the diagram and assessments as shown in said Engineer’s Reports for Landscape & Lighting Assessment District Nos. 94-1 (Brentwood Country Club); 95-2 (Hawthorne Landing); 95-3 (Pheasant Run); 95-4 (Diablo Estates); 95-5 (California Spirit and Glory); 95-6 (Gerry Ranch); 95-7 (SPA D); 95-8 (Garin Ranch); 97-1 (Brentwood Lakes); 97-2 (Marsh Creek Apartments); 97-3 (Brentwood Park Apartments); 98-3 (Solana); 98-4 (Birchwood Estates); 98-5 (Arroyo Seco); 99-3 (SPA ‘L’); 99-4 (California Grove); 99-5 (Deer Ridge Country Club); 99- 6 (Trailside); 99-7 (Termo); 99-8 (Gerry Property); 99-9 (Richmond American); 00-2 (Lyon Woodfield); 00-3 (California Orchard); 00-4 (Brentwood Park); 01-1 (Laird Project); 02-2 (Oakstreet); 02-3 (Apricot Way); 02-4 (Braddock & Logan), 02-5 (Sand Creek & Brentwood Blvd.); 02- 6 (Balfour & John Muir); 02-7 (San Jose & Sand Creek); 02-8 (Lone Tree); 02-9 (Balfour Plaza); 02-10 (Lone Tree Center); 02-11 (Lone Tree Plaza); 02- 12 (Sunset Industrial); 02-13 (Stonehaven); 03-2 (Meritage Lone Tree); 03- 3 (Brookdale Court); 03-4 (Tri City Plaza); 03-5 (West Summerset); 03-6 (Arbor Village); 03-7 (Garin Ranch Commercial); 03-8 (Blackhawk Commercial); 04-2 (Balfour-Griffith Commercial); 05-2 (South Brentwood Blvd. Commercial), 06-2 (Palmilla); 06-3 (Vineyards); 06-4 (Villa Amador); 06-5 (Barrington); 11-1 (North Brentwood Boulevard); 14-1 (Mission Grove); 14-2 (Ferro-Ronconi); 15-1 (Bella Fiore); 15-2 (Renaissance Estates); 16-1 (Bond Lane); 16-2 (Sellers); 17-1 (Sparrow); 17-2 (Catching’s Ranch), 17-3 (Cornerstone Fellowship); 19-1 (Terrene), 19-2 (Alvernaz), 21-2 (Orchard Trails), 21-3 (Bennett Estates), 23-1 (Orchard Grove) No. 24-1 (Hanson Lane), No. 24-2 (Trumark Trailside), No. 24-3 (Inez Estates), 19-3 (Citywide and Local Maintenance Services), 21-1 (Deer Ridge Landscape Improvements), and the Citywide Park Maintenance District No. 98-1; and

3. It authorizes the levy and collection of assessments for Fiscal Year 2025/26 for the Landscape & Lighting Assessment Districts, Landscape & Lighting Assessment District No. 19-3, Landscape & Lighting Assessment District No. 21-1, and the Citywide Park Maintenance District No. 98-1; and

4. It authorizes the amendment of the Fiscal Year 2025/26 Operating Budgets for the Landscape & Lighting Assessment Districts, Landscape & Lighting

Assessment District No. 19-3, Landscape & Lighting Assessment District No. 21-2, and the Citywide Park Maintenance District No.98-1, including revenues, appropriations, and transfers as detailed in the Final Engineer’s Reports; and

5. It finds that the City’s actions detailed in this resolution are categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) as the action consists of proceedings for the levying of annual assessments for landscape, lighting, and park maintenance purposes and is within certain classes of projects that have been determined not to have a significant effect on the environment in that it meets the criteria set forth in sections 15273 (Rates, Tolls, Fares, and Charges), 15301(c) (Existing Facilities), and 15306 (Information Collection) of the State CEQA Guidelines.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Brentwood at a regular meeting held on the 27th day of May 2025 by the following vote:

Consolidated Report for the City’s
Landscaping and LighƟng
Assessment Districts
Fiscal Year 2025‐26
Final Engineer’s Report
May 27, 2025

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2025-26 TABLE OF CONTENTS
.
-iPage No.

City Directory..............................................................................................ii Certificates................................................................................................. iii SECTION I - Introduction ...........................................................................1 SECTION II - Impacts of Proposition 218 ...................................................2 SECTION III - Engineer’s Report................................................................3 Part A - Plans and Specifications.....................................................5 Part B - Estimate of Cost .................................................................9 Part C - Assessment District Diagram............................................11 Part D - Method of Apportionment of Assessment.........................13 Part E - Property Owner List & Assessment Roll ...........................67 Appendix A - Detailed Project Cost Breakdown
Appendix B - Assessment Roll

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2025-26 CITY DIRECTORY
.
-iiCITY OF BRENTWOOD

CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS AND CITY STAFF
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
City Council Members
Susannah Meyer
Mayor
Pa'tanisha Pierson Faye Maloney
Vice Mayor Council Member
Jovita Mendoza Tony Oerlemans
Council Member Council Member
Darin Gale
Interim City Manager
Allen Baquilar Amanda McVey
City Engineer City Clerk
Kerry Breen Darin Gale
Director of Finance & Information Systems Interim Director of Parks & Recreation Francisco & Associates
Assessment Engineer

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2025-26 CERTIFICATES
.
-iiiENGINEER'S REPORT

CITY OF BRENTWOOD
CONSOLDIATED REPORT FOR THE CITY’S

LANDSCAPE & LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS
Fiscal Year 2025-26
The undersigned, acting on behalf of Francisco & Associates, respectfully submits the enclosed Engineer’s Report as directed by the City of Brentwood City Council pursuant to the provisions of Article XIIID, Section 4 of the California Constitution, and provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (Section 22500 et. seq. of the California Streets and Highways Code). The undersigned certifies that he is a Professional Engineer, registered in the State of California.

Dated: May 5, 2025 By:

Eduardo Espinoza, P.E.

RCE No. 83709
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the Engineer's Report, together with the Assessment Roll and Assessment District Diagram thereto attached was filed with me on the ______ day of __________________, 2025.

Amanda McVey, City Clerk
City of Brentwood
Contra Costa County, California
By:

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer's Report, together with the Assessment Roll and the Assessment District Diagram thereto attached, was approved, and confirmed by the City Council of the City of Brentwood, Contra Costa County, California, on the day of ___________________, 2025.

Amanda McVey, City Clerk
City of Brentwood
Contra Costa County, California
By:

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION I
Fiscal Year 2025-26 INTRODUCTION
.
-1-

SECTION I

INTRODUCTION

ENGINEER'S REPORT

CITY OF BRENTWOOD
CONSOLIDATED REPORT FOR THE CITY’S

LANDSCAPE & LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS
Fiscal Year 2025-26
Background Information
To ensure the proper flow of funds for the ongoing operation, maintenance, and servicing of specific improvements within the boundaries of the City of Brentwood, the City Council, through the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, has previously approved the formation of seventy (70) Assessment Districts, sixty-eight (68) of which are summarized in this Report. The Annual Engineer’s Reports for Landscape and Lighting Assessment District No. 19-3 and Landscape and Lighting Assessment District No. 21-1 are prepared under separate covers due to the unique nature of the assessment districts. Improvements, which may be constructed, operated, maintained, and serviced by the Assessment Districts, include, but are not limited to:

Landscaping, street lighting, parks, open space facilities, trails, Contra Costa County Flood Control channel landscaping and associated appurtenant facilities.

Generally, developers construct these public improvements as conditions of approval for their permits for new housing or commercial/industrial developments. However, the ongoing operation, maintenance and servicing of these improvements are financed through the Assessment Districts. The formation of these Assessment Districts ensures that the operation, maintenance, and servicing of the improvements are specifically paid for by those property owners who directly benefit from the improvements.

Current Annual Administration
As required by the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, the Engineer's Report includes:
(1) a description of the improvements to be operated, maintained, and serviced by each Assessment District, (2) a cost estimate for each Assessment District, and (3) a listing of the proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26 assessments to be levied upon each assessable lot or parcel within each Assessment District.

The City of Brentwood will hold a Public Hearing on May 27, 2025, regarding these various Assessment Districts which will provide an opportunity for any interested person to be heard. At the conclusion of the Public Hearing, the City Council may adopt a resolution confirming the assessment rates as originally proposed or as modified.

Payment of these annual assessments for each parcel will be made in the same manner and at the same time as payments are made for their annual property taxes. All funds collected through the assessments must be placed in a special fund and can only be used for the purposes stated within this Report.

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION II
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PROPOSITION 218
.
-2-

SECTION II
IMPACTS OF PROPOSITION 218
Fiscal Year 2025-26
On November 5, 1996, California voters approved Proposition 218 entitled "Right to Vote on Taxes Act" which added Articles XIIIC and XIIID to the California Constitution. While its title refers only to taxes, Proposition 218 establishes new procedural requirements for the formation and administration of assessment districts.

These new procedures establish that even if assessments are initially exempt from Proposition 218, future increases in assessments must comply with the provisions of Articles XIIIC and XIIID of the California Constitution. However, if the increase in assessments were anticipated in the assessment formula (e.g., CPI increase or assessment cap) then the assessment would comply with the intent and provisions of Proposition 218.

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 ENGINEER'S REPORT
.
-3-

SECTION III

ENGINEER'S REPORT PREPARED PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972
SECTION 22500 THROUGH 22679

OF THE CALIFORNIA STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE
Pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California), and in accordance with the Resolution of Initiation, being Resolution No. 2025-30, which directs the preparation and filing of the Engineer’s Report, adopted by the City Council of the City of Brentwood, on March 25, 2025 and in connection with the proceedings for:

CITY OF BRENTWOOD
CONSOLIDATED REPORT FOR THE CITY’S

LANDSCAPE & LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS
Herein after referred to as the “District", I, Eduardo R. Espinoza, P.E., the duly appointed ENGINEER OF WORK, submit herewith the "Report" consisting of five (5) parts as follows:

PART A: PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
This part describes the improvements in each District. Plans and specifications for the improvements are as set forth on the lists thereof, attached hereto, and are on file in the Office of the Brentwood City Clerk and Engineering Department and are incorporated herein by reference.

PART B: ESTIMATE OF COST
This part contains an estimate of the cost of the proposed improvements, including incidental costs and expenses in connection therewith, is as set forth on the lists thereof, attached hereto, and is on file in the City’s Parks and Recreation Department.

PART C: ASSESSMENT DISTRICT DIAGRAM
This part incorporates by reference a diagram of the Consolidated Assessment Districts showing the exterior boundaries of each District, the boundaries of any zones within each District and the lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel of land within each District. The diagram has been prepared by the Engineer of Work and is on file in the Office of the Brentwood City Clerk and the Parks and Recreation Department. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within each District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the Contra Costa County Assessor for the year when this Report was prepared. The Assessor's maps and records are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Report.

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 ENGINEER'S REPORT
.
-4-
PART D: METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF ASSESSMENT
This part contains the method of apportionment of assessments, based upon parcel classification of land within each District, in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received.

PART E: PROPERTY OWNER LIST & ASSESSMENT ROLL
This part contains a list of the Contra Costa County Assessor’s Parcel numbers, and the net amount to be assessed upon the benefited lands within each District. The Assessment Roll is filed in the Office of the Brentwood City Clerk and is incorporated in this Report by reference. The list is keyed to the records of the Contra Costa County Assessor, which are incorporated herein by reference.

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART A
.
-5-
PART A

PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS

IMPROVEMENTS AND SERVICES
The improvements and services authorized by the provisions of the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, being Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, commencing with Section 22500 (hereafter referred to as the “1972 Act”), that may be applicable to these Districts and associated assessments may include one or more of the following definitions:
• “Improvement” means one or any combination of the following:
o The installation or planting of landscaping.
o The installation or construction of statuary, fountains, and other ornamental structures and facilities.
o The installation or construction of public lighting facilities, including, but not limited to, traffic signals.
o The installation or construction of any facilities which are appurtenant to any of the forgoing, or which are necessary or convenient for the maintenance or servicing thereof, including, but not limited to, grading, clearing, removal of debris, the installation or construction of curbs, gutters, walls, sidewalks, or paving, or water, irrigation, drainage, or electrical facilities. o The installation of park or recreational improvements, including, but not limited to all the following:
 Land preparation, such as grading, leveling, cutting and filling, sod, landscaping, irrigation systems, sidewalks, and drainage.  Lights, playground equipment, play courts, and public restrooms. o The maintenance or servicing, or both, of any of the forgoing, and of any improvements authorized below.
o The acquisition of land for park, recreational, or open space purposes. o The acquisition of any existing improvement otherwise authorized herein. o The acquisition or construction of any community center, municipal auditorium or hall, or similar public facility for the indoor presentation of performances, shows, stage productions, fairs, conventions, exhibitions, pageants, meetings, parties, or other group events, activities, or functions, whether those events, activities, or functions are public or private. • “Incidental expenses” include all the following:
o The costs of preparation of the report, including plans, specifications, estimates, diagram, and assessment.
o The costs of printing, advertising, and giving of published, posted, and mailed notices.
o Compensation payable to the county for collection of assessments. o Compensation of any engineer or attorney employed to render services in proceedings pursuant to this part.

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART A
.
-6-
o Any other expenses incidental to the construction, installation, or maintenance and servicing of improvements.
o Any expenses incidental to the construction, installation, or maintenance and servicing of the improvements.
o Any expenses incidental to the issuance of bonds or notes. o Costs associated with any elections held for the approval of a new or increased assessment.
• “Landscaping” means trees, shrubs, grass, or other ornamental vegetation. • “Maintain” or “maintenance” means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation, and services of any improvement, including:
o Repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement. o Providing for the life, growth, health, and beauty of landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing, or treating for disease or injury.
o The removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris, and other solid waste. o The cleaning, sandblasting, and painting of walls and other improvements to remove or cover graffiti.
• “Public lighting facilities” means all works or improvements used or useful for the lighting of any public places, including ornamental standards, luminaries, poles, supports, tunnels, manholes, vaults, conduits, pipes, wires, conductors, guys, stubs, platforms, braces, transformers, insulators, contacts, switches, capacitors, meters, communication circuits, appliances, attachments, and appurtenances. • “Service” or “servicing” means the furnishing of:
o Electric current or energy, gas, or other illuminating agent for any public lighting facilities or for the lighting or operation of any other improvements. o Water for the irrigation of any landscaping, the operation of any fountains, or the maintenance of any other improvements.

DESCRIPTION OF DISTRICT IMPROVEMENTS
The improvements, which have been constructed within the City of Brentwood, and those which may be subsequently constructed, will be operated, maintained, and serviced are generally described as follows:

The construction, operation, maintenance, servicing, and replacement of landscaping and street lighting located along arterial and local roadways, Grant Street Trail and other trail improvements, parks and recreational improvements, and appurtenant facilities including but not limited to; personnel, electrical energy, utilities such as water, materials, contractual services, and other items necessary for the satisfactory operation of these services and improvements as described below.

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART A
.
-7-
Street Lighting Improvements Along Arterial and Major Roadways Median and roadside streetlights located along arterial and major roadways in the City consist of, but are not limited to poles, fixtures, bulbs, conduits, equipment including guys, anchors, posts and pedestals, metering devices, utilities and other appurtenant facilities within the public rights-of-way and easements benefitting parcels within the boundaries of the Districts.

Landscaping Improvements Along Arterial and Major Roadways Median and roadside landscaping improvements located along arterial and major roadways in the City consist of, but are not limited to landscaping, irrigation, planting, shrubbery, ground cover, trees, pathways, hardscapes, walls, fences, utilities, and other appurtenant facilities required to provide landscaping within the public rights-of-way and easements benefitting parcels within the boundaries of the Districts.

Grant Street Trail Improvements
Grant Street Trail improvements consist of, but are not limited to landscaping, irrigation, planting, shrubbery, ground cover, trees, pathways, hardscapes, walls, fences, utilities, and other appurtenant facilities required to provide landscaping within the public rightsof-way and easements benefitting parcels within the boundaries of the Districts.

Park Improvements
Community and neighborhood parks and open space improvements in the City consist of, but are not limited to parks, open space, drainage areas, creeks, ponds, pathway materials, landscaping, trees, shrubbery, sidewalks, tot lots, park equipment, playgrounds, fences, etc. including the removal of trash and debris, and other appurtenant facilities within the public park areas, public rights-of-way, and easements benefitting parcels within the boundaries of the Districts.

In-Tract Street Lighting Improvements
In-tract streetlights located along and adjacent to in-tract roadways of each District consist of, but are not limited to poles, fixtures, bulbs, conduits, equipment including guys, anchors, posts and pedestals, metering devices, utilities and other appurtenant facilities within the public rights-of-way and easements benefitting parcels within the boundaries of the Districts.

In-Tract Landscaping Improvements
In-tract landscaping improvements located within or adjacent to the District consist of, but are not limited to landscaping, irrigation, planting, shrubbery, ground cover, trees, pathways, hardscapes, walls, monuments, fences, utilities, and other appurtenant facilities required to provide landscaping within the public rights-of-way and easements benefitting parcels within the boundaries of the Districts.

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART A
.
-8-
Contra Costa Flood Control Landscape Maintenance
Beginning in Fiscal Year 2000-01 and thereafter, certain Districts became responsible for increased landscape maintenance along the Contra Costa County Flood Control rightsof-way. For a more detailed description of the affected areas refer to the agreement between the City of Brentwood and the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District for Creeks, Trails, Landscaping, and Lighting.

Improvement diagrams have been prepared identifying all the improvements and areas that are to be maintained by the Districts. A copy of these diagrams is on file with the City Parks and Recreation Department.

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART B
.
-9-
PART B

ESTIMATE OF COST
The 1972 Act requires that a special fund be set up for the collection of revenues and expenditures of each District. The Act provides that the total cost of construction, operation, and maintenance and servicing of the public landscaping, street lighting, parks, trails, and open space improvements, etc. can be recovered by each District. Incidental expenses including administration of the Districts, engineering fees, legal fees and all other costs associated with the construction, operation and maintenance and servicing of the Districts can also be included.

Revenues collected from the assessments shall be used only for the expenditures represented above. A contribution to each District by the City may be made to reduce assessments as the City deems appropriate. Any balance remaining on July 1 at the end of the fiscal year must be carried over to the next fiscal year unless the funds are being accumulated for future capital improvements or operating reserves.

The table on the following page provides a summary of the estimated revenues and cost estimates for Fiscal Year 2025-26.

For a detailed breakdown of the revenues and cost estimates for each District, as well as Grant Street Trail and Street Lighting and Landscaping Improvements along Arterials and Major Roads, please refer to both Appendix "A" in this report, and the City’s budget for Fiscal Year 2025-26.

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART B
.
-10-
District District Name
June 30, 2025
Fund Balance
available for
Operating
Reserves
Fiscal Year
2025-26
Expenditures
Fiscal Year
2025-26
Capital
Reserve
Contribution
Contribution
other than
Fiscal Year
2025-26
Assessment
Revenues
Fiscal Year
2025-26
Assessment
Revenue (1)
June 30, 2026
Fund Balance
available for
Operating
Reserves
94-1 Brentwood Country Club $23,669 ($1,119,481) ($4,590) $492,103 $655,448 $47,149 95-2 Hawthorne Landing $44,840 ($254,593) ($4,515) $154,663 $122,394 $62,789 95-3 Pheasant Run $356 ($11,097) $0 $2,343 $8,755 $356
95-4 Diablo Estates $14 ($10,413) $0 $2,225 $8,189 $14
95-5 California Spirit and Glory $54,350 ($322,565) ($3,756) $167,794 $168,398 $64,221 95-6 Gerry Ranch $6,399 ($62,476) ($410) $29,144 $41,006 $13,663 95-7 SPA D $18,368 ($214,656) ($2,990) $112,711 $118,191 $31,624 95-8 Garin Ranch $56,943 ($509,657) ($36,532) $276,151 $297,367 $84,272 97-1 Brentwood Lakes $53,035 ($479,477) ($5,626) $11,004 $474,100 $53,035 97-2 Marsh Creek Apartments $1 ($44,630) $0 $17,812 $26,819 $1 97-3 Brentwood Park Apartments $131 ($40,924) $0 $35,968 $5,032 $207 98-3 Solana $5,752 ($44,599) ($254) $8,789 $36,235 $5,923 98-4 Birchwood Estates $13,144 ($50,934) ($1,259) $22,874 $31,456 $15,281 98-5 Arroyo Seco $106 ($40,946) $0 $11,214 $30,552 $926 99-3 SPA L $125,032 ($864,034) ($17,594) $312,152 $599,472 $155,028 99-4 California Grove $10,743 ($68,698) ($684) $28,565 $42,771 $12,697 99-5 Deer Ridge Country Club $187,929 ($804,747) ($18,728) $7,892 $815,584 $187,929 99-6 Trailside $8,890 ($58,679) ($1,180) $32,021 $27,838 $8,890 99-7 Termo $65,058 ($240,758) ($2,923) $92,355 $151,326 $65,058 99-8 Gerry Property $6,616 ($67,953) ($345) $272 $68,027 $6,616 99-9 Richmond American $56,329 ($210,518) ($3,820) $48,333 $166,005 $56,329 00-2 Lyon Woodfield ($64) ($57,741) ($515) $8,787 $54,109 $4,576 00-3 California Orchard $15,774 ($142,283) ($783) $647 $142,420 $15,774 00-4 Brentwood Park $30,654 ($159,167) ($4,304) $1,312 $162,160 $30,654 01-1 Laird Project $4,336 ($88,666) ($6) $6,388 $82,284 $4,336 02-2 Oakstreet $132,952 ($526,005) ($77,523) $6,869 $596,659 $132,952 02-3 Apricot Way $103,821 ($1,138,722) ($9,863) $4,350 $1,144,236 $103,821 02-4 Bradock & Logan $13,573 ($60,833) ($1,256) $2,217 $59,872 $13,573 02-5 Sand Creek & Brentwood Boulevard $1,252 ($99,700) $0 $50 $99,651 $1,252 02-6 Balfour & John Muir $3,461 ($47,772) ($319) $6,460 $41,632 $3,461 02-7 San Jose & Sand Creek $214 ($103,294) $0 $9 $103,285 $214 02-8 Lone Tree $12 ($53,706) $0 $0 $53,707 $12
02-9 Balfour Plaza $1,228 ($7,258) ($27) $50 $7,236 $1,228 02-10 Lone Tree Center $18 ($20,886) $0 $2,164 $18,723 $18 02-11 Lone Tree Plaza (Arcadia) $12 ($61,504) $0 $0 $61,505 $12 02-12 Sunset Industrial $9,243 ($70,854) ($4,407) $458 $74,804 $9,243 02-13 Stonehaven $778 ($25,723) ($67) $32 $25,758 $778
03-2 Meritage Lone Tree $226,341 ($1,491,251) ($21,589) $9,485 $1,503,355 $226,341 03-3 Brookdale Court $15,453 ($82,456) ($3,834) $695 $85,596 $15,453 03-4 Tri City Plaza $3 ($12,762) $0 $243 $12,519 $3
03-5 West Summerset $10,890 ($62,402) ($2,660) $489 $64,574 $10,890 03-6 Arbor Village $104 ($26,843) $0 $8,407 $18,572 $240 03-7 Garin Ranch Commercial $4 ($6,372) $0 $0 $6,372 $4 03-8 Blackhawk Commercial $46 ($33,971) $0 $2 $33,969 $46 04-2 Balfour-Griffith Commercial $3 ($7,650) $0 $262 $7,388 $3 05-2 South Brentwood Boulevard Commercial $1,198 ($17,273) $0 $9,355 $7,918 $1,198 06-2 Palmilla $76,884 ($451,566) ($15,828) $3,392 $464,003 $76,884 06-3 Vineyards $44,356 ($610,129) ($3,886) $1,852 $612,163 $44,356 06-4 Villa Amador $1 ($34,003) $0 $0 $34,004 $1
06-5 Barrington $86,770 ($566,845) ($14,510) $3,761 $577,594 $86,770 11-1 North Brentwood Boulevard $2,733 ($47,820) ($307) $14,313 $36,033 $4,952 14-1 Mission Grove $13,334 ($78,194) ($1,073) $555 $78,712 $13,334 14-2 Ferro-Ronconi $34,516 ($132,941) ($5,704) $1,495 $137,150 $34,516 15-1 Bella Fiore $5,795 ($88,002) ($7) $232 $87,777 $5,795 15-2 Renaissance Estates $5,558 ($18,132) ($149) $2,989 $15,293 $5,558 16-1 Bond Lane $19,227 ($87,575) ($4,403) $857 $91,122 $19,227 16-2 Sellers $19,766 ($111,429) ($1,028) $1,013 $111,444 $19,766 17-1 Sparrow $986 ($32,046) $0 $39 $32,008 $986
17-2 Catchings Ranch $8,809 ($27,204) ($345) $359 $27,191 $8,809 17-3 Cornerstone Fellowship $1 ($7,165) $0 $0 $7,166 $1 19-1 Terrene $11,371 ($198,413) ($6,451) $584 $204,281 $11,371 19-2 Alvernaz $9,969 ($103,019) ($5,117) $501 $107,635 $9,969 21-2 Orchard Trails $25,443 ($118,751) ($232) $1,749 $96,668 $4,877 21-3 Bennett Estates $6,279 ($20,978) ($28) $830 $18,796 $4,899 23-1 Orchard Grove $3,000 ($55,561) $0 $516 $64,940 $12,895 24-1 Hanson Lane $0 ($67,205) $0 $213 $71,434 $4,442
24-2 Trumark Trailside $0 ($83,385) $0 $923 $89,121 $6,659 24-3 Inez Estates $0 ($6,517) $0 $34 $7,048 $565
(1) Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART C
.
-11-
PART C

ASSESSMENT DISTRICT DIAGRAM
The boundaries of each of the City of Brentwood’s Landscape & Lighting Districts are completely within the boundaries of the City of Brentwood. The consolidated Assessment Diagram for the sixty-eight (68) Assessment Districts is on file in the Office of the City Clerk of the City of Brentwood and shown on the following page of this Report. The assessor’s parcel numbers (APN) and lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within each District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the Contra Costa County Assessor, for the year when this Report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Report.

14-2
02-11
03-8
99-9
94-1N
99-7
99-5
94-1E
00-2
95-6 95-7
02-11
02-3
02-2
02-6
97-2
02-10
94-1S
06-2
06-4
15-2 21-3
14-1
19-2
19-2
02-3
06-3
03-2
16-2
17-2
17-1
16-1
17-3
15-1
02-7
97-1
95-8
06-2
00-3
97-3
05-2
02-3
00-4
02-5
06-5
04-2
99-8
03-2
99-4
03-2
99-3
03-2
03-3
95-2 95-5
02-9
98-4
02-9
03-7
11-1
03-6
01-1
99-6
03-4 02-8
02-4
95-4
95-3
98-3
02-13
03-5
21-2
23-1
98-5
02-12
24-1
24-3
24-2
City of Brentwood
Landscape & Lighting Assessment Districts
± 2,000 1,000 0 2,000 4,000
Feet
LEGEND
Parcel Lines City Limit
Landscape and Lighting Assessment Districts (LLADs)
15-1
15-2
16-1
16-2
14-1
14-2
03-3
03-4
03-5
03-6
03-7
03-8
04-2
05-2
06-2
06-3
06-4
06-5
11-1
99-8
99-9
00-2
00-3
00-4
01-1
02-2
02-3
02-4
02-5
02-6
02-7
02-8
02-9
02-10
02-11
02-12
02-13
03-2
94-1
95-2
95-3
95-4
95-5
95-6
95-7
95-8
97-1
97-2
97-3
98-3
98-4
98-5
99-3
99-4
99-5
99-6
99-7
17-3
17-2
19-1
19-2
21-2
21-3
17-1
23-1
24-1
24-2
24-3

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
.
-13-
PART D

METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF ASSESSMENT
Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, permits the establishment of assessment districts by Agencies for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the operation, maintenance, servicing, and replacement of streetlights, landscaping, trails, open space, and park improvements.

Section 22573 of the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value.

This Section states:
"The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements.”
As a benefit-based assessment, parcels receiving benefit from improvements maintained by the Districts are subject to the assessment and will not be exempted if benefit is received. The improvements provided by these Districts and for which properties will be assessed have been identified as necessary, required and/or desired for the orderly development of the properties within each District to their full potential, consistent with the development plans and applicable portions of the City General Plan. As such, these improvements would be necessary and required of individual property owners for the development of such properties and the ongoing operation, servicing and maintenance of these improvements would be the financial obligation of those properties. Therefore, the improvements and the annual costs of ensuring the maintenance and operation of the improvements are a distinct and special benefit to the properties within the Districts. In addition, Article XIIID, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Because assessments are levied on the basis of benefit, they are not considered a tax, and therefore, are not governed by Article XIIIA of the California Constitution.

The 1972 Act permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement" (Sec. 22574). Thus, the 1972 Act requires the levy of a true "assessment" rather than a "special tax."
Article XIIID provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways (all of which are

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
.
-14-
typically not assigned an APN by the County), and that portion of public property that is not developed and used for business purposes similar to private commercial, industrial, and institutional activities (such as office buildings like a City Hall, etc.). Also exempted from the assessment would be utility rights-of-ways, common areas (such as in condominium complexes), and any other property that is deemed to be unable to develop by the City. These types of parcels do not benefit from the improvements.

QUANTIFICATION OF BENEFIT
Each District provides a funding source for the operation, maintenance, servicing and replacement of street lighting, landscaping, recreation/trail, and park improvements authorized under the statute and that benefit properties within the boundaries of each District.

In order for the City to separate out the general and special benefits for each improvement type, an analysis of each improvement was conducted. The analysis reviewed the purpose and users of each improvement, and then identified the properties that benefit from the improvement both within and outside the City and within and outside each District, and then allocated the costs to maintain, service, and replace each improvement type to each identified property.

Because general benefits are not assessable, any costs associated with general benefits or special benefits assigned to properties (both within and outside and the City) not in a District are to be paid for by the City. Only the costs associated with the special benefits conferred on property within each District from the authorized improvements are assessable, and therefore assessed herein. A summary of the analysis by improvement type is described below.

STREET LIGHTING ALONG ARTERIAL AND MAJOR ROADWAYS
Street lighting located along the City’s arterial and major roadways provides a benefit to parcels inside and outside the City. The benefits from streetlights are enhanced illumination which allows for:
• Safer vehicle and pedestrian access to and from property. • Enhanced deterrence of criminal or suspicious activity such as property theft, vandalism, criminal activity, illegal dumping, and damage to improvements and property.
• Improved ability of pedestrians and motorists to see. • Improved traffic circulation and reduced nighttime accidents and personal property loss.
• Increased nighttime visibility resulting in enhanced safety on roads, streets, and in public areas.

To determine which properties benefit from street lighting along the City’s arterial and major roadways a benefit analysis was performed. The analysis utilized Google Maps to determine which arterial and major roadways within the City were most likely to be used by property owners/residents when driving or walking to various destinations inside and outside of the City. The analysis showed that all properties within the City would utilize the

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
.
-15-
City’s arterial and major roadway system when traveling to destinations within the City or to other cities and communities. The analysis also found that there are additional properties located outside the City limits that would utilize the City’s arterial and major roadway system when traveling through the City to various destinations outside the City.

Vehicular or pedestrian traffic flow commencing outside of the City but traveling to a destination inside the City was determined to be a special benefit to the destination parcel within the City. The analysis used each parcel’s physical location as a starting destination and then selected ending destinations were inputted (e.g., neighboring cities or communities surrounding the City of Brentwood). If Google Maps showed the property owner/resident located outside the City would pass through and utilize the City’s arterial and major roadway system to travel to a destination outside of the City, then they were considered to receive a benefit from the City’s arterial and major roadway system. In addition, the analysis showed that most parcels outside of the City did not benefit from the improvements because they did not utilize the City’s roadways to travel to a destination parcel outside of the City, but would in most circumstances, if not all rather utilize Highway 4 to traverse the City or use an alternative route, therefore circumventing the City’s arterial and major roadways.

In addition to the special and direct benefits the property owners within the City receive from these enhanced street lighting improvements, there are also some incidental general benefits received by vehicular and pedestrian flow-through traffic (traffic that does not stop within the City) which originates from properties outside the City limits from individuals who use the City’s arterial and major roadway system to travel to another destination outside of the City. It has been determined that some properties not located within the City, north of the City limits, utilize arterial and major roadways within the City when traveling to destinations south of the City and that some properties not located within City, south and east of the City limits, utilize arterial and major roadways within the City when traveling to a destination north of the City. Properties meeting these criteria have been identified and such benefits must be accounted for and cannot be assessed to the properties within the Districts.

To quantify and separate the special benefits received by property owners within the City limits and the general benefit received by the property owners outside the City, Equivalent Dwelling Units (EDUs) were assigned to all benefitting properties (both inside and outside the City). The analysis resulted in a benefit boundary being drawn and EDUs being assigned to one of three categories of parcels: special benefits assigned to properties that lie within the City and not in a District, special benefits assigned to properties that lie within the City and in a District, and general benefits assigned to properties that lie outside the City.

It was determined that 2.81% of the EDUs were assigned to properties located outside of the City. Therefore, it is estimated that 97.19% of the annual cost to operate, maintain, service and replace the arterial and major roadway street lighting would be a special and direct benefit to the parcels within the City and 2.81% of the annual cost to operate, maintain, service and replace the arterial and major roadway street lighting would be a general benefit. However, only 75.84% of the total EDUs were assigned for special benefits to parcels in the City and in a District, therefore only 75.84% of the costs can be

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
.
-16-
allocated to parcels in Districts, and the remaining 24.16% of benefits (special benefits assigned to property in the City and not in a District and general benefits) will be paid by the City.

LANDSCAPING ALONG ARTERIAL AND MAJOR ROADWAYS
Landscaping located along the City’s arterial and major roadways provides a benefit to parcels within and outside the City. The benefits from landscaping include enhanced beautification which allows for:
• Enhanced desirability of property through association with the improvements. • Improved aesthetic appeal of properties providing a positive representation of the area and properties.
• Enhanced beautification to the adjacent developments. • Increased sense of pride in ownership of property within the Districts resulting from well-maintained improvements associated with the properties. • Enhanced quality of life through well-maintained green space and landscaped areas.
• Reduced criminal activity and property-related crimes (especially vandalism) against properties in the District through well-maintained surroundings and amenities including abatement of graffiti.
• Environmental enhancement through improved erosion resistance, dust and debris control, and fire prevention.
• Enhanced environmental quality of the parcels by moderating temperatures, providing oxygenation, and attenuating noise.

To determine which properties benefit from landscaping along the City’s arterial and major roadways a benefit analysis was performed. The analysis utilized Google Maps to determine which arterial and major roadways within the City were most likely to be used by property owners/residents when driving or walking to various destinations inside and outside of the City. The analysis showed that all properties within the City would utilize the City’s arterial and major roadway system when traveling to destinations within the City or to other cities and communities. The analysis also found that there are additional properties located outside the City limits that would utilize the City’s arterial and major roadway system when traveling through the City to various destinations outside the City.

Vehicular or pedestrian traffic flow commencing outside of the City but traveling to a destination inside the City was determined to be a special benefit to the destination parcel within the City. The analysis used each parcel’s physical location as a starting destination and then selected ending destinations were inputted (e.g., neighboring cities or communities surrounding the City of Brentwood). If Google Maps showed the property owner/resident located outside the City would pass through and utilize the City’s arterial and major roadway system to travel to a destination outside of the City, then they were considered to receive a benefit from the City’s arterial and major roadway system. In addition, the analysis showed that most parcels outside of the City did not benefit from the improvements because they did not utilize the City’s roadways to travel to a destination parcel outside of the City, but would in most circumstances, if not all rather utilize Highway 4 to traverse the City or use an alternative route, therefore circumventing the City’s arterial and major roadways.

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
.
-17-
In addition to the special and direct benefits the property owners within the City receive from these enhanced landscaping improvements, there are also some incidental general benefits received by vehicular and pedestrian flow-through traffic (traffic that does not stop within the City) which originates from properties outside the City limits from individuals who use the City’s arterial and major roadway system to travel to another destination outside of the City. It has been determined that some properties not located within the City, north of the City limits, utilize arterial and major roadways within the City when traveling to destinations south of the City and that some properties not located within City, south and east of the City limits, utilize arterial and major roadways within the City when traveling to a destination north of the City. Properties meeting these criteria have been identified and such benefits must be accounted for and cannot be assessed to the properties within the District.

To quantify and separate the special benefits received by property owners within the City limits and the general benefit received by the property owners outside the City, EDUs were assigned to all benefiting properties (both inside and outside the City). The analysis resulted in a benefit boundary being drawn and EDUs being assigned to one of three categories of parcels: special benefits assigned to properties that lie within the City and not in a District, special benefits assigned to properties that lie within the City and in a District, and general benefits assigned to properties that lie outside the City. It was determined that parcels within the categories that are not in a District benefit less than parcels within the Districts due to the proximity of the landscaping to the properties within the Districts. This finding resulted in the EDUs assigned to parcels in the City and not in a District and parcels outside the City being reduced by 50%.

It was determined that 1.63% of the EDUs were assigned to properties located outside of the City. Therefore, it is estimated that 98.37% of the annual cost to operate, maintain, service and replace the arterial and major roadway landscaping would be a special and direct benefit to the parcels within the City and 1.63% of the annual cost to operate, maintain, service and replace the arterial and major roadway landscaping would be a general benefit. However, only 86.23% of the total EDUs were assigned for special benefits to parcels in the City and in a District, therefore only 86.23% of the costs can be allocated to parcels in Districts, and the remaining 13.77% of benefits (special benefits assigned to property in the City and not in a District and general benefits) will be paid by the City.

GRANT STREET TRAIL
Grant Street trail provides special and direct benefits to the parcels located within a certain proximity to the trail. These special and direct benefits consist of enhanced recreational opportunities such as walking, jogging, biking, etc. within and along their developments.

These benefits allow for:
• Increases in options to exercise and incorporate recreational opportunities into daily routines.

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
.
-18-
• Increases in opportunities to travel and connect with places people may need or want to go.
• Enhanced environmental opportunities because of improvement in air quality due to people utilizing the trail verse driving to nearby destinations. • Specific enhancements in property values due to the increase in walkability of an area and the increase in amenities.

In addition, the trail provides general benefits to the public-at-large since this is a public trail system and anyone from the public can access it. To determine who was using the trail, City’s Parks and Recreation Department staff performed a trail user survey over multiple days at different times and locations along the trail over a three-month period.

Based upon their survey findings, ninety-three percent (93%) of the trail users were benefitting property owners located both within the City and those outside the City limits, who lived within a ½-mile (+/-) of the trail. Therefore, it is estimated that 93.00% of the annual cost to operate, maintain, service and replace the trail improvements would be a special and direct benefit to the parcels within the ½-mile radius (+/-) both within and outside the City and 7.00% of the annual cost to operate, maintain, service and replace the trail improvements would be a general benefit. Special benefits assigned to properties that lie within ½ mile (+/-) of the trail that are not within a District (in or outside the City), are special benefits that will be paid by the City because they cannot be assessed in the Districts. Only the benefits associated with properties within the City and within a District that are within the ½ distance (+/-) of the trail will be assessed to the Districts.

PARK FACILITES
The City of Brentwood’s General Plan policy is aimed at ensuring that recreational opportunities will continue to exist throughout the City and that an adequate park system continues to be developed and maintained to serve the City. In keeping with these policies, the City Council formed a Citywide assessment district for park maintenance in 1997 to secure a funding mechanism for a portion of the benefits and associated costs to maintain community parks and neighborhood parks. In addition, the Districts were also established to fund park costs associated with each benefiting property for the community and neighborhood parks that could not be funded from the Citywide Park District. For the purposes of this report, community parks are defined as typically being larger parks that are designed with amenities to serve the City as a whole as described further in the Parks, Trails and Recreation Master Plan originally approved on August 23, 1994 and subsequently approved on June 25, 2002. Neighborhood parks are defined as being generally smaller than community parks and typically benefit those residents located within a one-half mile radius from the park and as further defined within the Parks, Trails and Recreation Master Plan previously referenced.

There are 99 Parks spread throughout the City serving a population of approximately 65,000 residents. Community and neighborhood parks provide a special and direct benefit to the parcels within the City. The special and direct benefit to the parcels consists of enhanced recreational opportunities, including baseball, soccer, swimming, basketball, walking, jogging, etc. and the use of improvements such as: picnic tables, barbequing, playground equipment, community center rooms, green spaces, benches, bioswales, etc.

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
.
-19-
The parks and the associated recreational opportunities provide for more aesthetically pleasing neighborhoods, environmental and health benefits, community gathering places, and an overall improved and healthier community image, etc. If these park improvements were not installed, property within the Districts would not look as appealing to property owners, prospective property buyers, and patrons alike, which would adversely affect the value of their property. Based on the Parks and Economic Development Report published in the American Planning Association, homes adjacent and near parks and open space are typically valued at 8-20% higher than comparable properties, with positive price effect declining to zero about ½ mile away. Therefore, park improvements provide a special and direct benefit to property located within ½ miles of park improvements.

Furthermore, the Brentwood Parks, Trails, and Recreation Master Plan development guidelines as previously referenced herein, states that, neighborhood parks should service residents within a ½ mile +/- radius or approximately 1,000 to 2,000 people. The City maintains on average one neighborhood park per 800 residents. In addition to the special and direct benefits the property owners receive within the City from these enhanced park improvements, there are also some incidental benefits received by residents located from outside the City that may utilize the City’s community and neighborhood parks. Even though these are incidental benefits, they must be accounted for and cannot be assessed to the properties within the Districts.

Based on park user data, it is conservatively estimated that approximately 95% of the benefits associated with community parks are of benefit to property within the City and 98% of the benefits associated with neighborhood parks are of a special and direct benefit to properties within ½ mile distance (+/-). Therefore, 95% of the costs to annually operate, maintain, service and replace the community parks and 98% of the costs to annually operate, maintain, service and replace the neighborhood parks would be a special and direct benefit to the parcels within the City, and 5% and 2%, respectively of the annual costs to operate, maintain, service and replace the parks would be a general benefit.

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
.
-20-

LOCAL IN-TRACT STREET LIGHTING
To determine which properties benefit from in-tract or development specific street lighting a benefit analysis was performed. Street lighting located along and adjacent to the in-tract streets provides a special and direct benefit to parcels within the developments. The special and direct benefits from streetlights within the development consists of enhanced illumination which allows for safer vehicle and pedestrian access to and from property. In addition, this enhanced illumination helps deter criminal or suspicious activity such as property theft, vandalism, illegal dumping, etc.

Since the in-tract streets within the development are designed to have minimal flow through traffic, there are few reasons for vehicles to access the in-tract streets unless their destination is to or from a single-family residential parcel within the development.

However, it is reasonable to conclude that some vehicular traffic may on a rare occasion utilize the in-tract streets due to the need to turn around or a mistaken turn into the development. The rare circumstance where a pedestrian or vehicle mistakenly uses the in-tract streets, have been determined to be a rare and infrequent circumstance. Even though these are rare and infrequent circumstances, they must be accounted for and cannot be assessed to the properties within the Districts. Therefore, based on flow-through traffic it is conservatively estimated that approximately 98% of the annual trips along local in-tract roadways within the development would be a special and direct benefit to the parcels within the Districts and 2% of the annual trips along local in-tract roadways within the development would be a general benefit.

To quantify and separate the special benefits received by all property within the development EDUs were assigned to all benefitting properties inside the development as identified. It was determined that 2.00% of the cost to operate, maintain, service and replace the in-tract street lighting were assigned to properties located outside of the development. Therefore, it is estimated that 98.00% of the annual cost to operate, maintain, service and replace the in-tract street lighting would be a special and direct benefit to the parcels within each development and 2.00% of the annual cost to operate, maintain, service and replace the in-tract street lighting would be a general benefit.

LOCAL IN-TRACT LANDSCAPING
To determine which properties benefit from in-tract or development specific landscaping a benefit analysis was performed. Landscaping located along and adjacent to the in-tract streets provides a special and direct benefit to parcels within the development. The special and direct benefits from in-tract landscaping within the development consists of enhanced beautification to the entrances and along the roadsides within the development. Property owners who reside within these developments realize this enhanced aesthetic benefit when they are entering and exiting the development. If these in-tract landscape improvements were not installed, the developments would not look as appealing to property owners and prospective property buyers which would adversely affect the value of their property. Therefore, these landscape improvements provide a specific enhancement to their property values and not a general enhancement of property values.

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
.
-21-
Since the in-tract streets within the development are designed to have minimal flow through traffic, there are few reasons for vehicles to access the in-tract streets unless their destination is to or from a single-family residential parcel within the development.

However, it is reasonable to conclude that some vehicular traffic may on a rare occasion utilize the in-tract streets due to the need to turn around or a mistaken turn into the development. The rare circumstance where a pedestrian or vehicle mistakenly uses the in-tract streets, have been determined to be a rare and infrequent circumstance. Even though these are rare and infrequent circumstances, they must be accounted for and cannot be assessed to the properties within the Districts. Therefore, based on flow-through traffic it is conservatively estimated that approximately 98% of the annual trips along local in-tract roadways within the development would be a special and direct benefit to the parcels within the Districts and 2% of the annual trips along local in-tract roadways within the development would be a general benefit.

To quantify and separate the special benefits received by all property within the development EDUs were assigned was applied to all benefitting properties inside the development as identified. It was determined that 2.00% of the cost to operate, maintain, service and replace the in-tract landscaping were assigned to properties located outside of the development. Therefore, it is estimated that 98.00% of the annual cost to operate, maintain, service and replace the in-tract landscaping would be a special and direct benefit to the parcels within the development and 2.00% of the annual cost to operate, maintain, service and replace the in-tract landscaping would be a general benefit.

ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY
The total operation, maintenance and servicing costs for the landscaping, street lighting, parks, open space, and trail improvements are apportioned in accordance with a methodology that is consistent with standard assessment engineering practices. The specific method of apportioning the costs of the improvements to the benefiting parcels for each of the Districts is in accordance with the methodology developed and approved by the property owners at the time of each District’s formation.

As certain subdivisions have developed and continue to develop throughout the City of Brentwood, they may be annexed into an existing District or a new District may be created.

Each new subdivision is evaluated to determine which improvements are of a specific and direct benefit to the parcels within the subdivision and then a determination is made whether to annex them into an existing District or form a new District. The parcels, which benefit from the improvements, are then identified and a benefit assessment methodology is developed to allocate the costs of the improvements to the benefiting parcels.

As a benefit-based assessment, parcels receiving benefit from improvements maintained by the Districts are subject to the assessment and will not be exempted if benefit is received.

Since the assessments are levied on the owners of properties as shown on the secured property tax rolls, the final charges must be assigned by Assessor's Parcel Number. If assessments were to be allocated by parcel, not considering land use, benefit would not

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
.
-22-
be allocated accurately, because a single-family parcel would be paying the same as a 50-unit apartment parcel or a large commercial establishment. Therefore, as previously stated, the total assessment costs are allocated to each parcel of land based on the benefit received by each parcel. The assessment methodology is generally explained below and then in greater detail in each individual District’s methodology on the following pages.

The assessment methodology utilizes the EDU methodology as discussed below.

Single-Family Residential Parcels - The single-family residential parcel has been selected as the basic unit for the calculation of assessments since it represents approximately 90% of the parcels within the City. Therefore, the single-family residential parcel is defined as one (1.00) Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU) per parcel. The assessment methodology used to assign EDUs to other land uses in proportion to the special benefit they receive relative to the single-family residential parcel is discussed below.

Condominium, Townhome and Mobile Home Parcels - Condominiums, townhomes and mobile homes on average have approximately 75% of the building square footage compared to a single-family home. Furthermore, studies consistently show that these types of residential products impact public infrastructure approximately 75% as much as a single-family residential parcel. Therefore, all condominium, townhome and mobile home parcels are assessed 0.75 EDUs per parcel.

Multi-Family Residential Units - Multi-family residential units on average have approximately 50% of the building square footage compared to a single-family home.

Furthermore, studies consistently show that multi-family residential units impact public infrastructure approximately 50% as much as a single-family home. Therefore, all multifamily parcels are assessed 0.50 EDUs per unit.

Non-Residential Parcels - Commercial, industrial, institutional, and other non-residential properties are assessed at three (3) EDUs per acre of land. The 3.00 EDU per acre allocation is based upon the average size of a single-family parcel in the City of Brentwood which is approximately 1/6 of an acre. For every acre of non-residential land approximately 6 single-family homes could be constructed on that acre of land which would equate to

6.00 EDUs per acre. Furthermore, it was determined that Non-Residential parcels benefit less than residential properties from the authorized improvements because their employees have less time and opportunity to use and benefit from the improvements, than residents who live within the City. Employees typically benefit from or may use the improvements before work, during breaks and at lunch, or after work. Residents have the ability to use the improvements during the same times and on weekends and holidays, since they reside in the area. Based on this information, it is reasonable to assume that for non-residential property the opportunity to use and benefit from the improvements is approximately 50% of that realized by residential properties. Therefore, EDUs assigned to non-residential property are assessed three (3) EDUs per acre of land because they have been discounted by 50% to account for the differences in benefit from improvements conferred on residential and non-residential property.

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
.
-23-
Undeveloped Parcels – All undeveloped properties are assessed at 25% of the developed EDUs assigned for each parcel of land based on the properties land use classification.

Undeveloped properties benefit less from the improvements than developed property because undeveloped properties do not have structures which house residents or utilize employees. However, the improvements funded by the Districts do benefit undeveloped property because improvements have already been installed that allows for development to occur and to use the improvements immediately upon the initiation of development making the property more attractive. Based on this information, it is reasonable to assume that undeveloped property benefits less than developed property. To determine the difference in special benefit conferred on developed and undeveloped property, the Contra Costa County Assessor’s assessed values for property within the City were reviewed to determine what percentage of assessed value is typically associated with the underlying land and what percentage is typically associated with the structure. Based upon the review, it was determined that approximately 25% of the assessed value of developed property in the City is associated with the underlying land. Based on the comparison of benefits of developed property to undeveloped property it is reasonable to assess the undeveloped property at 25% of the rate for developed property. Therefore, EDUs assigned to undeveloped residential and non-residential property have been discounted by 75% to account for the differences in benefit from improvements conferred on developed and undeveloped property.

Exempt Parcels - Publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the improvements. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways (all of which are typically not assigned an APN by the County), and that portion of public property that is not developed and used for business purposes similar to private commercial, industrial, and institutional activities (such as office buildings like a City Hall, etc.). Also exempted from the assessment would be utility rights-of-ways, common areas (such as in condominium complexes), and any other property that is deemed to be unable to develop by the City. These types of parcels do not benefit from the improvements. Also exempted from the assessments are private streets, utility easements, HOA common areas (except club houses, community centers, parking lots, etc.) and any other parcels that do not receive a special and direct benefit from the improvements.

Furthermore, parcels within each District may be assessed as developed once the final maps have been approved by the City of Brentwood and or it is anticipated that improvements will need to be maintained or reserve funds will need to be collected for the ensuing fiscal year.

Adjustment of Assessments
Any property owner who demonstrates that the amount of their assessment is in error as a result of incorrect information being used to apply the foregoing method of spread, may file a written appeal with the Director of Parks and Recreation. Any such appeal is limited to correction of an assessment during the then current or, if before July 1, the upcoming

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
.
-24-
fiscal year. Upon the filing of any such appeal, the Director of Parks and Recreation shall promptly review the information provided by the property owner and if he/she finds that the assessment should be modified, the Director of Parks and Recreation shall have the authority to make the appropriate changes in the assessment roll. If any such changes are approved after the assessment roll has been filed with the County for collection, the Director of Parks and Recreation is authorized to refund to the property owner the amount of any approved reduction if the District reserve is adequate. Claims against the City for adjustments not granted by the Director of Parks and Recreation shall be governed by the City’s written claim procedures under the Tort Claims Act (Government Code Section 810 and following).

Following is a listing of the various Districts, their corresponding number and type of parcels/units/acres within each District, Fiscal Year 2025-26 maximum assessment rates, and Fiscal Year 2025-26 applied assessment rates along with the amount proposed to be assessed and placed on the Contra Costa County secured property tax roll. The amount to be assessed was determined by taking into account general benefits and any other contributions by the City. The amount to be assessed is then divided by the applicable number of EDUs as defined herein to calculate the applied Fiscal Year 2025-26 assessment rate. Under no circumstance may a District levy an amount that exceeds the maximum assessment rate for the applicable fiscal year.

Assessment District 94-1 North, South, East, East-Com (Brentwood Country Club) - Subdivisions 6848, 7642, 7816, 7869, 7870, 7871, 7872, 7873, 7939, 7940, 8017, 8022, 8081, 8082, 8083, 8084, 8085, 8088, 8089, 8462, & DR01-34. DR04-34 was annexed in Fiscal Year 2006-07.

Assessment District No. 94-1 was formed in 1994, has four (4) zones of benefit, and is comprised of 839 single-family residential parcels, one vacant single-family parcel, and one institutional parcel north of Balfour (NORTH); 1,336 single-family residential parcels and two commercial parcels south of Balfour (SOUTH); 329 single-family residential parcels south of Balfour and east of Fairview (EAST); and 11 commercial parcels located at the south and northeast corner of Balfour and Fairview (EASTCOM).

Single family parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel. Commercial parcels are assessed at 3.00 EDUs/acre.

This Assessment District set maximum assessment rates per equivalent dwelling unit (EDU) for both the NORTH and SOUTH zones with an allowance for a 2% increase each fiscal year.

The Zone EAST-COM was annexed in Fiscal Year 2003-04 for commercial property.

The maximum assessment rate established at formation included maintenance of certain areas that are currently maintained by the property owner, however if the property owner fails to maintain their landscaping improvements to City of Brentwood standards, then the maximum assessment rate was thought to be set high enough for the City to step in and maintain the improvements and assess the property owner for these costs. The assessment rate has been set under the assumption that the property

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
.
-25-
owner will continue to maintain these specific improvements and the City will maintain all other intended improvements as identified at the time of annexation.

Zones EAST and EAST-COM also have an allowance for a minimum of 2% CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year of June 30, 2003).

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 860.21 EDUs in NORTH Zone; 1,353.66 EDUs in SOUTH Zone; 329.00 EDUs in EAST Zone; and 52.62 EDUs in EAST-COM Zone that are assessable and the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $655,448 (as shown in Appendix A).

Therefore, the current assessment rates for Fiscal Year 2025-26 are as follows:
• parcels NORTH of Balfour are $247.50/EDU.
• parcels SOUTH of Balfour are $205.42/EDU.
• parcels EAST of Fairview are $441.37/EDU.
• parcels EAST COM of Fairview are $366.07/EDU.

Assessment District 95-2 (Hawthorn Landing) - Subdivision 7369, 8066, 8242 & 8371 (8608).

Assessment District No. 95-2 is comprised of 323 single-family residential parcels.

This Assessment District was formed in 1995 and the maximum assessment rate was set with an allowance for a 2% increase each fiscal year. Single-family parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 323.00 EDU that are assessable. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $122,394 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $378.93/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $378.93/EDU

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
.
-26-
Assessment District 95-3 (Pheasant Run) - Subdivision 7349.

Assessment District No. 95-3 is comprised of 26 single-family residential parcels. This Assessment District was formed in 1995 and the maximum assessment rate was set with an allowance for a 2% increase each fiscal year. Single-family parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel.

In Fiscal Year 1997-98 the property owners within Assessment District No. 95-3 elected to operate and maintain their improvements through the establishment of a Homeowner Association. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 it is anticipated that all local improvements will be maintained through the Homeowners Association. However, the parcels will be assessed for citywide improvements and the capital replacement costs associated with the public improvements. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 26.00 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed within the Assessment District is 8,755 (as shown in Appendix A). If the homeowner association fails to properly operate and maintain the improvements within Assessment District No. 95-3, the City Council has the discretion to levy assessments up to the authorized maximum assessment rate.

Maximum Rate: $438.94/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $336.73/EDU
Assessment District 95-4 (Diablo Estates) - Subdivision 7272.

Assessment District No. 95-4 is comprised of 26 single-family residential parcels. This Assessment District was formed in 1995 and the maximum assessment rate was with an allowance for a 2% increase each fiscal year. Single-family parcels are assessed at

1.00 EDU/parcel.

In Fiscal Year 1999-00 the property owners within Assessment District No. 95-4 elected to operate and maintain their improvements through the establishment of a Homeowner Association. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 it is anticipated that all local improvements will be maintained through the Homeowners Association. However, the parcels will be assessed for citywide improvements and the capital replacement costs associated with the public improvements. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 26.00 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed within the Assessment District is $8189 (as shown in Appendix A). If the Homeowner Association fails to properly operate and maintain the improvements within Assessment District No. 95-4, the City Council has the discretion to levy assessments up to the authorized maximum assessment rate.

Maximum Rate: $447.20/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $314.93/EDU

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
.
-27-
Assessment District 95-5 (California Spirit and Glory) - Subdivisions 7736, 7802, 8383, & 8411.

Assessment District No. 95-5 is comprised of 486 single-family residential parcels.

This Assessment District was formed in 1995 and the maximum assessment rate was with an allowance for a 2% increase each fiscal year. Single-family parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 486.00 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $168,398 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $346.50/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $346.50/EDU
Assessment District 95-6 (Gerry Ranch) - Subdivisions 7059 & 7915.

Assessment District No. 95-6 is comprised of 88 single-family residential parcels. This Assessment District was formed in 1995 and the maximum assessment rate was set with an allowance for a 2% increase each fiscal year. Single-family parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 88.00 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $41,006 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $465.98/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $465.98/EDU

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
.
-28-
Assessment District 95-7 (SPA ‘D’) - Subdivisions 7948, 7950, 7995, 8011 & CUP00-

06. Assessment District No. 95-7 is comprised of 373 single-family residential parcels and a 3.187-acre commercial parcel. This Assessment District was formed in 1995 and the maximum assessment rate was set with an allowance for a 2% increase each fiscal year. Single-family parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel and commercial parcels are assessed at 3.00 EDUs/acre.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 382.56 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $118,191 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $308.95/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $308.95/EDU
Assessment District 95-8 (Garin Ranch) - Subdivisions 7798, 7799, 8009, 8010, 8138, 8221, 8222, 8425, 8537 & 8609. Subdivisions 8426, 8627, & 8840 were Annexed MidYear Fiscal Year 2003-04.

Assessment District No. 95-8 is comprised of 854 single-family residential parcels. This Assessment District was formed in 1995 and the maximum assessment rate was set with an allowance for a 2% increase each fiscal year. Single-family parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel and vacant single-family parcels are assessed at 0.25 EDU/parcel.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 854.00 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $297,367 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $348.20/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $348.20/EDU

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
.
-29-
Assessment District 97-1 (Brentwood Lakes) - Subdivisions 7705, 8063, 8209, 8210, 8305, 8322, 8373, 8374, 8375 & 8659 (8344) and DR04-37 was annexed in Fiscal Year 2006-07.

Assessment District No. 97-1 is comprised of 922 single-family residential parcels and four commercial parcels. This Assessment District was formed in 1997 and the maximum assessment rate was set with an allowance for a 2% increase each fiscal year. Single-family parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel, and commercial parcels are assessed at 3.00 EDU/acre.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 941.55 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $474,100 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $503.53/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $503.53/EDU
Assessment District 97-2 (Marsh Creek Apartments) – MS 355-96.

Assessment District No. 97-2 is comprised of one multi-family residential parcel consisting of 126 apartment units. This Assessment District was formed in 1997 and the maximum assessment rate was set with an allowance for a 2% increase each fiscal year.

In Fiscal Year 2001-02 the property owners within Assessment District No. 97-2 elected to operate and maintain their improvements through a property management association. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 it is anticipated that all local improvements will be maintained through the property management association. However, the parcel will be assessed for citywide improvements and the capital replacement costs associated with the public improvements. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 63.00 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed within the Assessment District is $26,819 (as shown in Appendix A). If the property management association fails to properly operate and maintain the improvements within Assessment District No. 97-2, the City Council has the discretion to levy assessments up to the authorized maximum assessment rate.

Maximum Rate: $486.38/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $425.70/EDU

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
.
-30-
Assessment District 97-3 (Brentwood Park Apartments) – MS 361-97.

Assessment District No. 97-3 is comprised of two multi-family residential parcels consisting of 160 apartment units. This Assessment District was formed in 1997 and the maximum assessment rate was set with an allowance for a 2% increase each fiscal year.

In Fiscal Year 2002-03 the property owners within Assessment District No. 97-3 elected to operate and maintain their improvements. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 it is anticipated that all local improvements will be maintained by the property owner. However, the parcels will be assessed for citywide improvements and the capital replacement costs associated with the public improvements. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 80.00 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed within the Assessment District is $5,032 (as shown in Appendix A). If the apartment complex fails to properly operate and maintain the improvements within Assessment District No. 97-3, the City Council has the discretion to levy assessments up to the authorized maximum assessment rate.

Maximum Rate: $69.64/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $62.89/EDU
Assessment District 98-3 (Solana) - Subdivision 6811.

Assessment District No. 98-3 is comprised of 82 single-family residential parcels. This Assessment District was formed in 1998 and the maximum assessment rate was with an allowance for a 2% increase each fiscal year. Single-family parcels are assessed at

1.00 EDU/parcel.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 82.00 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $36,235 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $441.88/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $441.88/EDU

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
.
-31-
Assessment District 98-4 (Birchwood Estates) - Subdivision 8048.

Assessment District No. 98-4 is comprised of 51 single-family residential parcels. This Assessment District was formed in 1998 and the maximum assessment rate was set with an allowance for a 2% increase each fiscal year. Single-family parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 51.00 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $31,456 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $616.78/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $616.78/EDU
Assessment District 98-5 (Arroyo Seco) - Subdivision 7476.

Assessment District No. 98-5 is comprised of 65 single-family residential parcels. This Assessment District was formed in 1998 and the maximum assessment rate was set with an allowance for a 2% increase each fiscal year. Single family parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 65.00 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $30,553 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $470.04/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $470.04/EDU

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
.
-32-
Assessment District 99-3 (Spa ‘L’) - Subdivisions 8033, 8055, 8069, 8146, 8147, 8172, 8176, 8178, 8195, 8196, 8197, 8225, 8395, 8697, 8460, & 8453. Subdivision 8529 was annexed in Fiscal Year 2004-05 & Subdivision 8808 was annexed in Fiscal Year 2005-06.

Assessment District No. 99-3 is comprised of 985 single-family residential parcels and two vacant single-family residential parcels. This Assessment District was formed in Fiscal Year 1999-00 and the maximum assessment rate was set with an allowance for a 2% increase each fiscal year. Single-family parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel and vacant single-family properties are assessed at 0.25 EDU/parcel.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 986.25 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $599,472 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $607.83/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $607.83/EDU
Assessment District 99-4 (California Grove) - Subdivision 8046.

Assessment District No. 99-4 is comprised of 72 single-family residential parcels. This Assessment District was formed in Fiscal Year 1999-00 and the maximum assessment rate was set with an allowance for a 2% increase each fiscal year. Single-family parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 72.00 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $42,771 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $594.05/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $594.05/EDU

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
.
-33-
Assessment District 99-5 (Deer Ridge Country Club) – Subdivisions 8253, 8478, 8479, 8480, 8481, 8482, 8483, 8484, 8485, 8486, 8488, 8829, 8490, 8489, 8491, 8492, 8493, 8494, 8495, 8277, 8278, & 8545. Subdivision 8352 was annexed mid-year Fiscal Year 2002-03.

Assessment District No. 99-5 is comprised of 1,056 single-family residential parcels, one commercial parcel, and one institutional parcel totaling 8.68 acres. This Assessment District was formed in Fiscal Year 1999-00; however, the maximum assessment rate was increased through a ballot process in Fiscal Year 2002-03 with an allowance for a minimum of a 2% CPI increase each fiscal year. The CPI increase is based upon the annual change in the Consumer Price Index for the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners as of (base year June 30, 2002). Single-family parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel, and commercial/institutional parcels are assessed at 3.00 EDUs/acre.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 1,082.04 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $815,584 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $979.25/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $753.75/EDU
Assessment District 99-6 (Trailside) - Subdivision 7975.

Assessment District No. 99-6 is comprised of 68 single-family residential parcels. This Assessment District was formed in Fiscal Year 1999-00 and the maximum assessment rate was set with an allowance for a 2% increase each fiscal year. Single-family parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 68.00 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $27,838 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $409.39/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $409.39/EDU

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
.
-34-
Assessment District 99-7 (Termo) - Subdivisions 7882 & 8676.

Assessment District No. 99-7 is comprised of 277 single-family residential parcels.

This Assessment District was formed in Fiscal Year 1999-00 and the maximum assessment rate was set with an allowance for a 2% increase each fiscal year. Singlefamily parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 277.00 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $151,326 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $546.30/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $546.30/EDU
Assessment District 99-8 (Gerry Property) - Subdivisions 7844 & 8180. Conditional Use Permit 06-37 was annexed in Fiscal Year 2008-09.

Assessment District No. 99-8- is comprised of 137 single-family residential parcels and one parcel that has a Conditional Use Permit 06-37 which is within residentially zoned property and has a Contra Costa County use code designation of single family. This Assessment District was formed in Fiscal Year 1999-00 and the maximum assessment rate was set with an allowance for a 2% increase each fiscal year. Single-family parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 137.00 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $68,027 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $606.74/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $496.54/EDU

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
.
-35-
Assessment District 99-9 (Richmond American) - Subdivisions 7474, 8170, 8368 & 8369.

Assessment District No. 99-9 is comprised of 245 single-family residential parcels.

This Assessment District was formed in Fiscal Year 1999-00 and the maximum assessment rate was set with an allowance for a 2% increase each fiscal year. Singlefamily parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 245.00 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $166,005 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $677.57/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $677.57/EDU
Assessment District 00-2 (Lyon Woodfield) - Subdivision 6665.

Assessment District No. 00-2 is comprised of 81 single-family residential parcels. This Assessment District was formed in Fiscal Year 2000-01 and the maximum assessment rate was with an allowance for a 2% increase each fiscal year. Single family parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 81.00 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $54,109 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $668.02/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $668.02/EDU

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
.
-36-
Assessment District 00-3 (California Orchard) - Subdivisions 8199, 8200, 8342, DR00- 36, DR00-27, & DR04-12.

Assessment District No. 00-3 is comprised of 265 single family parcels and 7 commercial developments entailing 5.027 acres. This Assessment District was formed in Fiscal Year 2000-01 and the maximum assessment rate was set with an allowance for a 2% increase each fiscal year. Single-family parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel and commercial properties are assessed at 3.00 EDUs/acre.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 280.08 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $142,420 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $533.02/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $508.49/EDU
Assessment District 00-4 (Brentwood Park) - Subdivisions 8226 & 8402.

Assessment District No. 00-4 is comprised of 245 single-family residential parcels.

This Assessment District was formed in Fiscal Year 2000-01 and the maximum assessment rate was set with an allowance for a 2% increase each fiscal year. Singlefamily parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 245.00 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $162,160 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $1,093.08/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $661.88/EDU

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
.
-37-
Assessment District 01-1 (Laird Project) - Subdivision 8416.

Assessment District No. 01-1 is comprised of 133 single-family residential parcels.

This Assessment District was formed in Fiscal Year 2001-02 and the maximum assessment rate was set with an allowance for a 2% increase each fiscal year. Single family parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 133.00 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $82,284 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $618.67/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $618.67/EDU
Assessment District 02-2 (Oakstreet) - Subdivision 8413, 8424, a multi-family parcel of 9 units & DR03-02 (Senior Apts.). Subdivision 8574 was annexed in Fiscal Year 2003-04 and Subdivisions 8534 & 8825 were annexed in Fiscal Year 2004-05.

Assessment District No. 02-2 is comprised of 599 single-family residential parcels, one parcel with 80 senior living apartments and one institutional parcel totaling 0.75 acres.

This Assessment District was formed in Fiscal Year 2002-03 and the maximum assessment rate was set with an allowance for a CPI increase each fiscal year. Singlefamily parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel, the senior living apartments/multifamily units are assessed at 0.50 EDUs/unit and institutional parcels are assessed at

3.00 EDUs/acre. These assessments will continue to have an allowance for a CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year June 30, 2002).

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 641.25 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $596,659 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $1,604.32/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $930.46/EDU

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
.
-38-
Assessment District 02-3 (Apricot Way) - Subdivisions 8408, & 8469. Subdivisions 8470, 8912 & 8603 were annexed Fiscal Year 2003-04. Subdivisions 8556, 8557, 8601, 8281, 8831, 8849, and DR02-11 were annexed mid-year of Fiscal Year 2003-04.

Subdivisions 8663, 8763, & 8701 were annexed in Fiscal Year 2005-06. Minor Subdivision 365-05 was annexed in Fiscal Year 2006-07. Minor Subdivision 354-04 was annexed midyear of Fiscal Year 2006-07. Subdivision 8982 was annexed in Fiscal Year 2007-08. The residential portion of Subdivision 8506 was annexed Fiscal Year 2008-09.

Assessment District No. 02-3 is comprised of 1,077 single-family residential parcels, 13 vacant single-family residential parcels and three parcels totaling 179 apartment units. This Assessment District was formed in Fiscal Year 2002-03 and the maximum assessment rate was increased in Fiscal Year 2003-04 through a ballot process with an allowance for a CPI increase each fiscal year. Single-family parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel and vacant single- family parcels are assessed at 0.25 EDU/parcel.

Apartment complexes are assessed at 0.50 EDU/unit. These assessments will continue to have an allowance for a CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year June 30, 2003).

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 1,169.75 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $1,144,236 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $2,687.88/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $978.19/EDU
Assessment District 02-4 (Bradock & Logan) - Subdivision 8421.

Assessment District No. 02-4 is comprised of 56 single-family residential parcels. This Assessment District was formed in Fiscal Year 2002-03 and the maximum assessment rate was set with an allowance for a CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year June 30, 2002). Single-family parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 56.00 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $59,872 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $1,069.14/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $1,069.14/EDU

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
.
-39-
Assessment District 02-5 (Sand Creek & Brentwood Boulevard) – 8671 (MS352-01), 8894, DR99-16, & CUP01-03. DR04-26 was annexed in Fiscal Year 2006-07, and DR05- 16 was annexed mid-year Fiscal Year 2006-07.

Assessment District No. 02-5 is comprised of 27.73 acres of institutional, industrial, commercial, and vacant commercial properties and 120 condominium parcels. This Assessment District was formed in Fiscal Year 2002-03 and the maximum assessment rate was set with an allowance for a CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year June 30, 2002). Condominium parcels are assessed at 0.75 EDUs/unit, commercial and industrial parcels are assessed 3.00 EDUs/acre and vacant commercial parcels are assessed at 0.75 EDUs/acre.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved or when the improvements to be maintained become the responsibility of the City. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 164.18 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $99,651 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $1,036.82/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $606.96/EDU

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
.
-40-
Assessment District 02-6 (Balfour & John Muir) – CUP00-9 (8550), DR03-01 (8754), MS358-04, DR03-24 and the Fire Station. CUP 02-04 and DR04-21 were annexed in Fiscal Year 2005-06.

Assessment District No. 02-6 is comprised of commercial, vacant commercial, and institutional parcels totaling 76.771 acres. This Assessment District was formed in Fiscal Year 2002-03 and the maximum assessment rate was set with an allowance for a CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year June 30, 2002).

Commercial/institutional parcels are assessed at 3.00 EDUs/acre and vacant commercial parcels are assessed at 0.75 EDUs/acre.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved or when the improvements to be maintained become the responsibility of the City. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 142.55 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $41,632 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $292.06/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $292.06/EDU

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
.
-41-
Assessment District 02-7 (San Jose and Sand Creek) – DR01-05 (MS357-01), & DR03- 04(MS353-01). DR06-08 was annexed in Fiscal Year 2007-08.

Assessment District No. 02-7 is comprised of commercial, vacant commercial and institutional parcels totaling 77.36 acres. This Assessment District was formed in Fiscal Year 2002-03 and the maximum assessment rate was set with an allowance for a CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year June 30, 2002). Commercial/institutional parcels are assessed at 3.00 EDUs/acre and vacant commercial parcels are assessed at 0.75 EDUs/acre.

The maximum assessment rate includes maintenance of certain areas that are currently proposed to be maintained by the property owners. However, the parcels will be assessed for citywide improvements and the capital replacement costs associated with the public improvements. If the property owners fail to maintain their landscaping improvements to City of Brentwood standards, then the maximum assessment rate has been set high enough for the City to step in and maintain the improvements and assess the property owner for these costs.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved or when the improvements to be maintained become the responsibility of the City. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 220.58 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $103,285 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $1,096.26/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $568.80/EDU
Some properties within Assessment District 02-7 are not located within the Grant Street Trail Benefit Boundary and as a result do not benefit from the Grant Street Trail improvements and will be assessed $366.77/EDU.

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
.
-42-
Assessment District 02-8 (Lone Tree) – MS 356-04 (Arco). CUP03-04 (Tire Center), MS364-02 (CUP02-18 Family Fitness, DR02-35 Shell, Restaurant) and CUP99-06 (Golden Hills Church) were annexed mid-year Fiscal Year 2003-04. DR05-13 and DR05- 03 were annexed in Fiscal Year 2006-07.

Assessment District No. 02-8 is comprised of commercial and vacant commercial parcels totaling 39.08 acres located at the southeast corner of Lone Tree and Empire Avenue. This Assessment District was formed in Fiscal Year 2002-03 and the maximum assessment rate was decreased in Fiscal Year 2003-04 with an allowance for a CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year June 2003). Commercial parcels are assessed at 3.00 EDUs/acre. Vacant commercial properties are assessed at 0.75 EDUs/acre.

The maximum assessment rate includes maintenance of certain areas that are currently proposed to be maintained by the property owners. However, the parcels will be assessed for citywide improvements and the capital replacement costs associated with the public improvements. If the property owners fail to maintain their landscaping improvements to City of Brentwood standards, then the maximum assessment rate has been set high enough for the City to step in and maintain the improvements and assess the property owner for these costs.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved or when the improvements to be maintained become the responsibility of the City. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 117.24 EDUs that are assessable, however the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $53,707 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $565.39/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $458.09/EDU

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
.
-43-
Assessment District 02-9 (Balfour Plaza) - CUP 01-23 or MS 356-00. DR06-20 was annexed in Fiscal Year 2007-08.

Assessment District No. 02-9 is comprised of commercial and vacant commercial parcels totaling 8.241 acres, located on the southeast corner of Balfour Road and Walnut Boulevard. This Assessment District was formed mid-year Fiscal Year 2002-03 and the maximum assessment rate was set with an allowance for a minimum of a 2% CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year December 2002). Commercial parcels are assessed at 3.00 EDUs/acre and vacant commercial properties are assessed at 0.75 EDUs/acre.

The maximum assessment rate includes maintenance of certain areas that are currently proposed to be maintained by the property owners. However, the parcels will be assessed for citywide improvements and the capital replacement costs associated with the public improvements. If the property owners fail to maintain their landscaping improvements to City of Brentwood standards, then the maximum assessment rate has been set high enough for the City to step in and maintain the improvements and assess the property owner for these costs.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved or when the improvements to be maintained become the responsibility of the City. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 16.60 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $7,236 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $990.73/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $435.85/EDU

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
.
-44-
Assessment District 02-10 (Lone Tree Center) – Subdivision 8617 or DR 01-32. DR05- 29 was annexed in Fiscal Year 2007-08. The 1.87-acre commercial parcel at the northwest corner of Lone Tree Way and Fairview Avenue and the proposed site of a future McDonald’s was annexed in Fiscal Year 2012-13.

Assessment District No. 02-10 is comprised of commercial and vacant commercial parcels totaling 29.747 acres, located on the north side of Lone Tree Way, west of Empire Avenue. This Assessment District was formed mid-year Fiscal Year 2002-03 and the maximum assessment rate was set with an allowance for a minimum of a 2% CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year December 2002). Commercial parcels are assessed at 3.00 EDUs/acre and vacant commercial properties are assessed at 0.75 EDUs/acre.

The maximum assessment rate includes maintenance of certain areas that are currently proposed to be maintained by the property owners. However, the parcels will be assessed for citywide improvements and the capital replacement costs associated with the public improvements. If the property owners fail to maintain their landscaping improvements to City of Brentwood standards, then the maximum assessment rate has been set high enough for the City to step in and maintain the improvements and assess the property owner for these costs.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved or when the improvements to be maintained become the responsibility of the City. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 73.19 EDUs that are assessable, however the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $18,723 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $255.81/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $255.81/EDU

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
.
-45-
Assessment District 02-11 (Lone Tree Plaza - Arcadia) - Subdivision 8515 (8768) or DR 01-30. The commercial portion of Subdivision 8506 was annexed Fiscal Year 2008-

09. Assessment District No. 02-11 is comprised of commercial and vacant commercial parcels totaling 82.275 acres, located south of Lone Tree Way and north of Sand Creek Road, between Heidorn Ranch Road and Jeffrey Way. This Assessment District was formed mid-year Fiscal Year 2002-03. The maximum assessment rate was set with an allowance for a minimum of a 2% CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year December 2002. Commercial parcels are assessed at 3.00 EDUs/acre and vacant commercial properties are assessed at 0.75 EDUs/acre.

The maximum assessment rate includes maintenance of certain areas that are currently proposed to be maintained by the property owners. However, the parcels will be assessed for citywide improvements and the capital replacement costs associated with the public improvements. If the property owners fail to maintain their landscaping improvements to City of Brentwood standards, then the maximum assessment rate has been set high enough for the City to step in and maintain the improvements and assess the property owner for these costs.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved or when the improvements to be maintained become the responsibility of the City. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 194.94 EDUs that are assessable, however the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $61,505 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $744.91/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $315.50/EDU

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
.
-46-
Assessment District 02-12 (Sunset Industrial) - Subdivision 8588 or 8842.

Assessment District No. 02-12 is comprised of 18 industrial, vacant industrial, and institutional parcels totaling 40.25 acres located north of Sunset Road, between Brentwood Boulevard and Sellers Avenue. This Assessment District was formed midyear Fiscal Year 2002-03. Industrial/ institutional parcels are assessed at 3.00 EDUs/acre and vacant industrial parcels are assessed at 0.75 EDU/acre. The maximum assessment rate was set with an allowance for a minimum of a 2% CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year December 2002). This maximum assessment rate includes maintenance of all areas.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved or when the improvements to be maintained become the responsibility of the City. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 112.425 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $74,804 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $973.41/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $665.36/EDU
Assessment District 02-13 (Stonehaven) - CUP 01-08 & Subdivision 8661.

Assessment District No. 02-13 is comprised of an 8.738-acre institutional parcel and 45 single-family parcels located at the northeast corner of Fairview and Central. This Assessment District was formed mid-year Fiscal Year 2002-03. Single-family parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel and institutional parcels are assessed at 3.00 EDUs/acre. The maximum assessment rate was set with an allowance for a minimum of a 2% CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year December 2002).

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved or when the improvements to be maintained become the responsibility of the City. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 71.21 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $25,758 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $1,281.43/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $361.70/EDU

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
.
-47-
Assessment District 03-2 (Meritage Lone Tree) - Subdivision 8546. Subdivisions 8561 & 8675 were annexed Mid-Year Fiscal Year 2003-04. Subdivisions 8724, 8788, 8789, 8832, & 8833 were annexed Fiscal Year 2005-06. Subdivisions 8674, 8875, 8954 and Minor Subdivisions 359-03 & 350-05 were annexed Fiscal Year 2006-07.

Assessment District No. 03-2 is comprised of 1,521 single-family parcels, two vacant single-family parcels and one 7.229-acre institutional parcel located at the southwest corner of O’Hara and Lone Tree Road. This Assessment District was formed Fiscal Year 2003-04. The maximum assessment rate was set with an allowance for a minimum of a 2% CPI increase each fiscal year which was based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year June 2003).

Single-family parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel, vacant single-family parcels are assessed at 0.25 EDUs/parcel, and institutional parcels are assessed at 3.00 EDUs/acre.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved or when the improvements to be maintained become the responsibility of the City. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 1,543.19 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $1,503,355 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $2,636.15/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $1,076.70/EDU
Some properties within Assessment District 03-2 are not located within the Grant Street Trail Benefit Boundary and as a result do not benefit from the Grant Street Trail improvements and will be assessed $874.67/EDU.

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
.
-48-
Assessment District 03-3 (Brookdale Court) - Subdivision 8722. Subdivision 8854 and minor subdivision 351-00 were annexed Fiscal Year 2006-07.

Assessment District No. 03-3 is comprised of 125 single-family parcels, three vacant single-family parcels and one parcel with 4 condominium units located at the eastern corner of Balfour and Fairview. This Assessment District was formed in Fiscal Year 2003-04 and the maximum assessment rate was set with an allowance for a minimum of a 2% CPI increase each fiscal year based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year June 2003). Single-family parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel and vacant single-family properties are assessed at

0.25 EDUs/parcel. Condominiums are assessed 0.75 EDUs/unit.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved or when the improvements to be maintained become the responsibility of the City. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 128.75 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $85,596 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $2,571.16/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $664.82/EDU

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
.
-49-
Assessment District 03-4 (Tri City Plaza) – CUP 01-24 and DR00-14 were annexed mid-year Fiscal Year 2003-04.

Assessment District No. 03-4 is comprised of 6 commercial, vacant commercial, and industrial parcels totaling 12.542 acres located on the north & south sides of Lone Tree Road, east of Fairview Avenue. This Assessment District was formed in Fiscal Year 2003-04 and the maximum assessment rate was decreased midyear Fiscal Year 2003- 04 with an allowance for a minimum of a 2% CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year June 2003). Commercial/industrial parcels are at assessed 3.00 EDUs/acre and vacant commercial parcels are assessed at 0.75 EDUs/acre.

The maximum assessment rate includes maintenance of certain areas that are currently proposed to be maintained by the property owners. However, the parcels will be assessed for citywide improvements and the capital replacement costs associated with the public improvements. If the property owners fail to maintain their landscaping improvements to City of Brentwood standards, then the maximum assessment rate has been set high enough for the City to step in and maintain the improvements and assess the property owner for these costs.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved or when the improvements to be maintained become the responsibility of the City. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 33.78 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $12,519 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $370.61/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $370.61/EDU

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
.
-50-
Assessment District 03-5 (West Summerset) – Subdivision 8953 and DR03-26.

Assessment District No. 03-5 is comprised of 90 single-family residential parcels and a 120-unit assisted living parcel that is 4.72 acres. It is located at the northwest corner of the Highway 4 Bypass and Cortona Way. This Assessment District was formed Fiscal Year 2003-04 and was reorganized in Fiscal Year 2005-06 (the maximum assessment rate was lowered). The maximum assessment rate was set with an allowance for a minimum of a 2% CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year June 2005). Single-family parcels are assessed 1.00 EDU/unit and the 120-senior assisted living institutional property is assessed at 3.00 EDUs/acre.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved or when the improvements to be maintained become the responsibility of the City. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 104.16 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $64,574 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $1,246.90/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $619.95/EDU
Assessment District 03-6 (Arbor Village) – Subdivision 8735.

Assessment District No. 03-6 is comprised of 66 single-family parcels located at the southeast corner of Brentwood Boulevard and Sycamore Avenue. This Assessment District was formed mid-year Fiscal Year 2003-04 and the maximum assessment was set with an allowance for a minimum of a 2% CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year June 2003). Single-family parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved or when the improvements to be maintained become the responsibility of the City. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 it is anticipated all local improvements will be maintained through a Homeowners Association. However, the single-family parcels will be assessed for citywide improvements and the capital replacement costs associated with the public improvements. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 66.00 EDUs assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed within the Assessment District is $18,573 (as shown in Appendix A). In addition, if the Homeowners Association fails to properly operate and maintain the improvements within Assessment District No. 03-6 the City Council has the discretion to levy assessments up to the authorized maximum assessment rate.

This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $412.78/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $281.40/EDU

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
.
-51-
Assessment District 03-7 (Garin Ranch Commercial) – DR02-06 or 8633.

Assessment District No. 03-7 is comprised of 8 commercial/vacant commercial parcels totaling 8.525 acres, located on the northeast corner of Brentwood Boulevard and Balfour Road. This Assessment District was formed mid-year Fiscal Year 2003-04 and the maximum assessment rate was set with an allowance for a minimum of a 2% CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year June 2003). Commercial parcels are assessed at 3.00 EDUs/acre and vacant commercial properties are assessed at 0.75 EDUs/acre.

The maximum assessment rate includes maintenance of certain areas that are currently proposed to be maintained by the property owners. However, the parcels will be assessed for citywide improvements and the capital replacement costs associated with the public improvements. If the property owners fail to maintain their landscaping improvements to City of Brentwood standards, then the maximum assessment rate has been set high enough for the City to step in and maintain the improvements and assess the property owner for these costs.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved or when the improvements to be maintained become the responsibility of the City. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 it is anticipated that parcels within LLAD 03-7 will be assessed for citywide landscape improvements and the capital replacement costs associated with the public improvements. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 21.32 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed within the Assessment District is $6,372 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $434.80/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $298.93/EDU

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
.
-52-
Assessment District 03-8 (Blackhawk Commercial) – Blackhawk Commercial Assessment District No. 03-8 will eventually be comprised of 86 developed and vacant single-family parcel and one institutional parcel totaling 6.690 acres, located on the southeast corner of Highway 4 Bypass and Balfour Road. This Assessment District was formed mid-year Fiscal Year 2003-04 and the maximum assessment rate was set with an allowance for a minimum of a 2% CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year June 2003). Vacant commercial parcels are assessed at 0.75 EDUs/acre and vacant single-family properties are assessed at 0.25 EDUs/parcel.

The maximum assessment rate includes maintenance of certain areas that are currently proposed to be maintained by the property owners. However, the parcels will be assessed for citywide improvements and the capital replacement costs associated with the public improvements. If the property owners fail to maintain their landscaping improvements to City of Brentwood standards, then the maximum assessment rate has been set high enough for the City to step in and maintain the improvements and assess the property owner for these costs.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved or when the improvements to be maintained become the responsibility of the City. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 92.57 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $33,969 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $1,030.78/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $366.95/EDU

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
.
-53-
Assessment District 04-2 (Balfour-Griffith Commercial) – CUP03-02 (In Shape City).

DR05-27 was annexed Mid-Year of Fiscal Year 2006-07.

Assessment District No. 04-2 is comprised of 5 commercial and vacant commercial parcels totaling 6.914 acres, located on the southwest corner of Balfour Road and Griffith Lane. This Assessment District was formed in Fiscal Year 2004-05 and the maximum assessment rate was set with an allowance for a minimum of a 2% CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year June 2004). Commercial parcels are assessed at 3.00 EDUs/acre and vacant commercial parcels are assessed at 0.75 EDUs/acre.

The maximum assessment rate includes maintenance of certain areas that are currently proposed to be maintained by the property owners. However, the parcels will be assessed for citywide improvements and the capital replacement costs associated with the public improvements. If the property owners fail to maintain their landscaping improvements to City of Brentwood standards, then the maximum assessment rate has been set high enough for the City to step in and maintain the improvements and assess the property owner for these costs.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved or when the improvements to be maintained become the responsibility of the City. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 20.74 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $7,388 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $356.16/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $356.16/EDU

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
.
-54-
Assessment District 05-2 (South Brentwood Boulevard Commercial) – DR03-09 (Best Western). DR04-07 (Harvest Commerce) was annexed Fiscal Year 2006-07. Minor Subdivision 353-05 (Valdry Ct. Business Park) was annexed in Fiscal Year 2009-10.

DR15-016 (Elite Storage) and DR16-001 (Tractor Supply) were annexed in Fiscal Year 2016-17.

Assessment District No. 05-2 is comprised of commercial and industrial parcels totaling

16.553 acres, located on Valdry Court. This Assessment District was formed Fiscal Year 2005-06 and the maximum assessment rate was set with an allowance for a minimum of a 2% CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year June 2005).

Commercial/industrial parcels are assessed at 3.00 EDUs/acre.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved or when the improvements to be maintained become the responsibility of the City. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 49.66 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $7,918 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $159.45/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $159.45/EDU
Assessment District 06-2 (Palmilla) – Subdivision 8729. Subdivision 8311 was annexed in Fiscal Year 2007-08. Subdivision 8446 was annexed Mid-Year Fiscal Year 2009-10.

Subdivision 9332 was re-subdivided in December 2013.

Assessment District No. 06-2 is comprised of 514 single-family parcels located at Walnut and Central and 8 vacant single-family parcels on St. James Court. This Assessment District was formed in Fiscal Year 2006-07 and the maximum assessment rate was set with an allowance for a minimum of a 2% CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year June 2006). Single-family units are assessed 1.00 EDU/unit.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved or when the improvements to be maintained become the responsibility of the City. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 516.00 EDUs that are assessable, and the total assessment revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $464,003 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $2,083.98/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $899.23/EDU

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
.
-55-
Assessment District 06-3 (Vineyards) – Subdivisions 8796, 8906 through 8910, 9186 and 9451.

Assessment District No. 06-3 is comprised of 1,266 single-family parcels, 3 vacant single-family parcels and 32.072 acres of commercial, vacant commercial, and vacant institutional parcels located in the south portion of Fairview Avenue and the City at State Highway 4 Bypass. This Assessment District was formed mid-year of Fiscal Year 2006-07 and the maximum assessment rate was set with an allowance for a minimum of a 2% CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year June 2006). Single-family parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel. Non-Residential parcels are assessed at

3.00 EDUs/acre. Vacant non-residential parcels are assessed at 0.75 EDUs/acre.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved or when the improvements to be maintained become the responsibility of the City. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 1,330.18 EDUs that are assessable, and the total revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $612,163 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $3,094.89/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $460.21/EDU

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
.
-56-
Assessment District 06-4 (Villa Amador) – Design Review 01-43 (Villa Amador Apartments).

Assessment District No. 06-4 is comprised of 96 multi-family units located at the northeast corner of Sand Creek Road and Shady Willow. This Assessment District was formed mid-year of Fiscal Year 2006-07 and the maximum assessment rate was set with an allowance for a minimum of a 2% CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year June 2006). Multi-family parcels are assessed at 0.50 EDU/unit.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved or when the improvements to be maintained become the responsibility of the City. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 48.00 EDUs that are assessable, and the total revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $34,004 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $1,750.66/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $708.41/EDU
Assessment District 06-5 (Barrington) – Subdivision 8548.

Assessment District No. 06-5 is comprised of 494 single-family parcels, and 6.26 acres of institutional and vacant institutional parcels located in the east portion of the City at Garin Parkway and Sand Creek Road. This Assessment District was formed mid-year of Fiscal Year 2006-07 and the maximum rate was set with an allowance for a minimum of a 2% CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year June 2006). Single-family parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel. Institutional parcels are assessed at 3.00 EDUs/acre and vacant institutional parcels are assessed at 0.75 EDUs/acre.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved or when the improvements to be maintained become the responsibility of the City. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 509.95 EDUs that are assessable, and the total revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $577,594 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $2,614.11/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $1,132.66/EDU

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
.
-57-
Assessment District 11-1 (North Brentwood Boulevard) – Subdivision 9155. Design Review 10-003 (The Grove at Sunset Court) was annexed in Fiscal Year 2012-13.

Assessment District No. 11-1 is comprised of 33 single-family parcels, 10 duet units, and a 54-unit apartment complex located on the west side of Brentwood Boulevard just south of Marsh Creek. This Assessment District was formed mid-year of Fiscal Year 2011-12 and the maximum rate was set with an allowance for a minimum of a 2% CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year June 2011). Single-family parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel, duets at 0.75EDU/parcel, and multi-family parcels are assessed at 0.50 EDUs/unit.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved or when the improvements to be maintained become the responsibility of the City. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 57.50 EDUs that are assessable, and the total revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements within the Assessment District is $36,033 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $1,084.05/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $626.67/EDU
Assessment District 14-1 (Mission Grove) – Subdivision 9154 and 9371.

Assessment District No. 14-1 is comprised of 129 single-family parcels located on the west side of Armstrong Road. This Assessment District was formed in Fiscal Year 2013-14 and the maximum rate was set with an allowance for a minimum of a 2% CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year June 2013). Single-family parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved or when the improvements to be maintained become the responsibility of the City. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 129.00 EDUs that are assessable, and the total revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements that benefit the Assessment District is $78,712 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $952.78/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $610.17/EDU

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
.
-58-
Assessment District 14-2 (Ferro-Ronconi) – Subdivision 9173.

Assessment District No. 14-2 is comprised of 160 single-family and two vacant singlefamily parcels located on the west side of Griffith Lane just north of Balfour Road. This Assessment District was formed in Fiscal Year 2013-14 and the maximum rate was set with an allowance for a minimum of a 2% CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year June 2013). Single-family parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel and vacant single-family parcels are assessed at 0.25 EDU/parcel.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved or when the improvements to be maintained become the responsibility of the City. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 160.00 EDUs that are assessable, and the total revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements that benefit the Assessment District is $137,150 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $1,415.58/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $857.19/EDU
Assessment District 15-1 (Bella Fiore) – Subdivision 9378.

Assessment District No. 15-1 is comprised of 98 single-family parcels located between Shady Willow Lane and Empire Avenue just north of Amber Lane. This Assessment District was formed mid-year of Fiscal Year 2014-15 and the maximum rate was set with an allowance for a minimum of a 2% CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year June 2015). Single-family parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved or when the improvements to be maintained become the responsibility of the City. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 98.00 EDUs that are assessable, and the total revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements that benefit the Assessment District is $87,777 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $920.63/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $895.68/EDU

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
.
-59-
Assessment District 15-2 (Renaissance Estates) – Subdivision 9372.

Assessment District No. 15-2 is comprised of 9 single-family parcels located south of Amber Lane just off Windy Springs Lane. This Assessment District was formed midyear of Fiscal Year 2014-15 and the maximum rate was set with an allowance for a minimum of a 2% CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year June 2015). Singlefamily parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved or when the improvements to be maintained become the responsibility of the City. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 9.00 EDUs that are assessable, and the total revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements that benefit the Assessment District is $15,293 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $1,699.19/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $1,699.19/EDU
Assessment District 16-1 (Bond Lane) – Subdivisions 9386 and 9387.

Assessment District No. 16-1 is comprised of 63 single-family parcels located between O’Hara Lane and Adams Lane north of Grant Street. This Assessment District was formed in Fiscal Year 2016-17 and the maximum rate was set with an allowance for a minimum of a 2% CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year June 2015). Singlefamily parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved or when the improvements to be maintained become the responsibility of the City. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 63.00 EDUs that are assessable, and the total revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements that benefit the Assessment District is $91,122 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $2,173.80/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $1,446.37/EDU

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
.
-60-
Assessment District 16-2 (Sellers) – Subdivisions 9411 and 9421.

Assessment District No. 16-2 is comprised of 180 single-family parcels located west of Sellers Avenue and south of Balfour Road. This Assessment District was formed midyear of Fiscal Year 2016-17 and the maximum rate was set with an allowance for a minimum of a 2% CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year June 2016). Singlefamily parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel and vacant single-family parcels are assessed at 0.25 EDUs/parcel.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved or when the improvements to be maintained become the responsibility of the City. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 180.00 EDUs that are assessable, and the total revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements that benefit the Assessment District is $111,444 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $619.13/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $619.13/EDU
Assessment District 17-1 (Sparrow) – Subdivision 9393.

Assessment District No. 17-1 is comprised of 50 single-family parcels located west of Brentwood Boulevard and north of Sand Creek Road. This Assessment District was formed mid-year of Fiscal Year 2016-17 and the maximum rate was set with an allowance for a minimum of a 2% CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year June 2016). Single-family parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved or when the improvements to be maintained become the responsibility of the City. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 50.00 EDUs that are assessable, and the total revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements that benefit the Assessment District is $32,008 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $966.20/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $640.15/EDU

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
.
-61-
Assessment District 17-2 (Catching’s Ranch) – Subdivision 9424.

Assessment District No. 17-2 is comprised of 24 single-family parcels located west of Minnesota Road and north of Balfour Road. This Assessment District was formed midyear of Fiscal Year 2016-17 and the maximum rate was set with an allowance for a minimum of a 2% CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year June 2016). Singlefamily parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel and vacant single-family parcels are assessed at 0.25 EDU/parcel.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved or when the improvements to be maintained become the responsibility of the City. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 24.00 EDUs that are assessable, and the total revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements that benefit the Assessment District is $27,191 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $1,413.59/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $1,132.94/EDU
Assessment District 17-3 (Cornerstone Fellowship) – DR15-004.

Assessment District No. 17-3 is comprised of one 5.312-acre institutional parcel located south of Lone Tree Way and west of Windy Springs Lane. This Assessment District was formed mid-year Fiscal Year 2017-18 and the maximum rate was set with an allowance for a minimum of a 2% CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year June 2017). Institutional parcels are assessed at 3.00 EDUs/acre.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved or when the improvements to be maintained become the responsibility of the City. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 15.94 EDUs that are assessable, and the total revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements that benefit the Assessment District is $7,166 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $530.04/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $449.64/EDU

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
.
-62-
Assessment District 19-1 (Terrene) – Subdivisions 9471 and 9496.

Assessment District No. 19-1 is comprised of 326 single-family parcels located east of Brentwood Boulevard and north and south of Sand Creek Road. This Assessment District was formed mid-year Fiscal Year 2018-19 and the maximum rate was set with an allowance for a minimum of a 2% CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year June 2018). Single-family parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel and vacant singlefamily parcels are assessed at 0.25 EDUs/parcel.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved or when the improvements to be maintained become the responsibility of the City. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 326.00 EDUs that are assessable, and the total revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements that benefit the Assessment District is $204,281 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $1,050.69/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $689.22/EDU
Some properties within Assessment District 19-1 are not located within the Grant Street Trail Benefit Boundary and as a result do not benefit from the Grant Street Trail improvements and will be assessed $487.19 EDU.

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
.
-63-
Assessment District 19-2 (Alvernaz) – Subdivision 9424. Subdivision 9496 was annexed in Fiscal Year 2019-20.

Assessment District No. 19-2 is comprised of 208 single family parcels located east of Empire Avenue and north of Lone Tree Way. This Assessment District was formed mid-year Fiscal Year 2018-19 and the maximum rate was set with an allowance for a minimum of a 2% CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year June 2018). Singlefamily parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved or when the improvements to be maintained become the responsibility of the City. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 208.00 EDUs that are assessable, and the total revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements that benefit the Assessment District is $107,635 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $713.37/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $517.48/EDU
Assessment District 21-2 (Orchard Trails) – Subdivision 9523.

Assessment District No. 21-2 is anticipated to be comprised of 77 single-family and 2 attached single-family parcels located south of Continente Avenue and west of Walnut Boulevard. This Assessment District was formed the beginning of Fiscal Year 2021-22 and the maximum rate was set with an allowance for a minimum of a 2% CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year of 2020). Single-family parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel and attached single-family parcels are assessed at 0.75 EDUs/parcel.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved or when the improvements to be maintained become the responsibility of the City. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 78.50 EDUs that are assessable, and the total revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements that benefit the Assessment District is $96,668 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $1,231.48/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $1,231.44/EDU

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
.
-64-
Assessment District 21-3 (Bennett Estates) – Subdivision 9519.

Assessment District No. 21-3 is anticipated to be comprised of 14 single family parcels located west of O’Hara Avenue and north of Grant Street Trail. This Assessment District was formed the beginning of Fiscal Year 2021-22 and the maximum rate was set with an allowance for a minimum of a 2% CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year of 2020). Single-family parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved or when the improvements to be maintained become the responsibility of the City. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 14.00 EDUs that are assessable, and the total revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements that benefit the Assessment District is $18,796 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $1,342.55/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $1,342.55/EDU
Assessment District 23-1 (Orchard Grove) – Subdivision 9535.

Assessment District No. 23-1 is anticipated to be comprised of 45 single family parcels and 6 duet parcels located east of Adams Lane and north of Gracie Lane. This Assessment District was formed the beginning of Fiscal Year 2023-24, and the maximum rate was set with an allowance for a minimum of a 2% CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year of 2022). Single-family parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel and duets are assessed at 0.75 EDU/parcel.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved or when the improvements to be maintained become the responsibility of the City. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 49.50 EDUs that are assessable, and the total revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements that benefit the Assessment District is $64,940 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $1,698.71/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $1,311.92/EDU

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
.
-65-
Assessment District 24-1 (Hanson Lane) – Subdivision 9547.

Assessment District No. 24-1 is anticipated to be comprised of 94 single family parcels located south of Lone Tree Way and east of Brentwood Boulevard. This Assessment District was formed the beginning of Fiscal Year 2024-25, and the maximum rate was set with an allowance for a minimum of a 2% CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year of 2023). Single-family parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved or when the improvements to be maintained become the responsibility of the City. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 94.00 EDUs that are assessable, and the total revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements that benefit the Assessment District is $71,434 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $759.93 /EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $759.93/EDU
Assessment District 24-2 (Trumark Trailside) – Subdivision 9610.

Assessment District No. 24-2 is anticipated to be comprised of 57 single family parcels and 6 duet parcels located north of Sand Creek Road and west of Fairview Avenue.

This Assessment District was formed the beginning of Fiscal Year 2024-25, and the maximum rate was set with an allowance for a minimum of a 2% CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year of 2023). Single-family parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel and duets are assessed at 0.75 EDU/parcel.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved or when the improvements to be maintained become the responsibility of the City. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 61.50 EDUs that are assessable, and the total revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements that benefit the Assessment District is $89,121 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $1,449.12/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $1,449.12/EDU

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
.
-66-
Assessment District 24-3 (Inez Estates) – Subdivision 9435.

Assessment District No. 24-3 is anticipated to be comprised of 8 single family parcels located south of Lone Tree Way and west of Gann Street. This Assessment District was formed the beginning of Fiscal Year 2024-25, and the maximum rate was set with an allowance for a minimum of a 2% CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the annual change in the San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners (base year of 2023). Single-family parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel.

Properties become assessable after they have had their final map approved or when the improvements to be maintained become the responsibility of the City. In Fiscal Year 2025-26 there are 8.00 EDUs that are assessable, and the total revenue needed to operate and maintain the improvements that benefit the Assessment District is $7,048 (as shown in Appendix A). This results in the following assessments to be levied:

Maximum Rate: $881.01/EDU
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Rate: $881.00/EDU

Landscape & Lighting Districts SECTION III
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART E
.
-67-
PART E

PROPERTY OWNER LIST & ASSESSMENT ROLL
A list of names and addresses of the owners of all parcels, and the description of each lot or parcel within each of the City of Brentwood’s Landscape & Lighting Districts is shown on the last equalized Property Tax Roll of the Contra Costa County Assessor, which by reference is hereby made a part of this Report.

This list is keyed to the Assessor's Parcel Numbers as shown on the Assessment Roll, which includes the proposed amount of assessments apportioned to each lot or parcel.

The Assessment Roll is on file in the Office of the City Clerk of the City of Brentwood and is shown in this Report as Appendix “B”.

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2025-26 APPENDIX A

APPENDIX A

DETAILED PROJECT COST BREAKDOWN

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 94-1
Brentwood Country Club
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2025 $23,669 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) ($6,078)
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) ($27,659)
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) ($298)
Landscaping ($44,244)
($78,279)
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($1,772)
Administration ($11,979)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($2,267)
($16,018)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail $0
Arterial Landscaping ($513,985)
Arterial Lighting ($60,085)
Parks ($451,114)
($1,025,184)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($47,149)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) ($4,590) ($51,739)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $1,978
Fund Balance Credit $490,125
Additional City Contribution $0
$490,125
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $655,448
Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. 3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 1

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 95-2
Hawthorne Landing
Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2025 $44,840 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) ($5,896)
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) ($75,710)
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) ($231)
Landscaping ($25,136)
($106,973)
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($2,360)
Administration ($15,953)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($291)
($18,604)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail $0
Arterial Landscaping ($63,964)
Arterial Lighting ($7,477)
Parks ($57,575)
($129,016)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($62,789)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) ($4,515) ($67,304)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $2,602
Fund Balance Credit $0
Additional City Contribution $152,061
$152,061
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $122,394
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. 3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 2

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 95-3
Pheasant Run
Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2025 $356 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) $0
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) ($585)
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) $0
Landscaping $0
($585)
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($13)
Administration ($90)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($23)
($126)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail $0
Arterial Landscaping ($5,149)
Arterial Lighting ($602)
Parks ($4,635)
($10,386)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($356)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) $0
($356)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $14
Fund Balance Credit $589
Additional City Contribution $1,740
$2,329
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $8,755
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. 3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 3

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 95-4
Diablo Estates
Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2025 $14 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) $0
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) $0
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) $0
Landscaping $0
$0
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($1)
Administration ($3)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($23)
($27)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail $0
Arterial Landscaping ($5,149)
Arterial Lighting ($602)
Parks ($4,635)
($10,386)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($14)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) $0
($14)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $1
Fund Balance Credit $137
Additional City Contribution $2,087
$2,224
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $8,189
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. 3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 4

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 95-5
California Spirit & Glory
Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2025 $54,350 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) ($10,381)
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) ($62,633)
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) ($208)
Landscaping ($36,051)
($109,273)
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($2,414)
Administration ($16,317)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($437)
($19,168)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail $0
Arterial Landscaping ($96,243)
Arterial Lighting ($11,251)
Parks ($86,630)
($194,124)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($64,221)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) ($3,756) ($67,977)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $2,644
Fund Balance Credit $0
Additional City Contribution $165,150
$165,150
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $168,398
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. 3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 5

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 95-6
Gerry Ranch
Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2025 $6,399 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) ($2,339)
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) ($11,924)
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) ($53)
Landscaping ($8,946)
($23,262)
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($514)
Administration ($3,471)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($79)
($4,064)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail $0
Arterial Landscaping ($17,427)
Arterial Lighting ($2,037)
Parks ($15,686)
($35,150)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($13,663)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) ($410)
($14,073)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $555
Fund Balance Credit $1,249
Additional City Contribution $27,340
$28,589
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $41,006
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. 3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 6

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 95-7
Greystone
Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2025 $18,368 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) ($3,505)
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) ($36,433)
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) ($150)
Landscaping ($13,599)
($53,687)
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($1,189)
Administration ($8,035)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($337)
($9,561)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail $0
Arterial Landscaping ($75,759)
Arterial Lighting ($8,856)
Parks ($66,793)
($151,408)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($31,624)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) ($2,990) ($34,614)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $1,325
Fund Balance Credit $0
Additional City Contribution $111,386
$111,386
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $118,191
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. 3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 7

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 95-8
Garin Ranch
Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2025 $56,943 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) ($11,964)
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) ($95,344)
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) ($1,431)
Landscaping ($34,456)
($143,195)
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($3,168)
Administration ($21,411)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($769)
($25,348)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail $0
Arterial Landscaping ($169,118)
Arterial Lighting ($19,770)
Parks ($152,226)
($341,114)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($84,272)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) ($36,532) ($120,804)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $4,102
Fund Balance Credit $0
Additional City Contribution $272,049
$272,049
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $297,367
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. 3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 8

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 97-1
Brentwood Lakes
Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2025 $53,035 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) ($6,143)
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) ($41,790)
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) ($148)
Landscaping ($41,686)
($89,767)
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($1,994)
Administration ($13,475)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($833)
($16,302)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail $0
Arterial Landscaping ($186,455)
Arterial Lighting ($21,797)
Parks ($165,156)
($373,408)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($53,035)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) ($5,626) ($58,661)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $2,234
Fund Balance Credit $8,770
Additional City Contribution $0
$8,770
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $474,100
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. 3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 9

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 97-2
Marsh Creek Apartments
Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2025 $1 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) $0
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) $0
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) $0
Landscaping $0
$0
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees $0
Administration $0
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($1)
($1)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail ($12,728)
Arterial Landscaping ($12,476)
Arterial Lighting ($1,458)
Parks ($17,967)
($44,629)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($1)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) $0
($1)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $0
Fund Balance Credit $278
Additional City Contribution $17,534
$17,812
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $26,819
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. 3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 10

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 97-3
Brentwood Park Apartments
Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2025 $131 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) $0
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) ($351)
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) $0
Landscaping $0
($351)
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($8)
Administration ($53)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($2)
($63)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail $0
Arterial Landscaping ($15,842)
Arterial Lighting ($1,852)
Parks ($22,816)
($40,510)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($207)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) $0
($207)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $8
Fund Balance Credit $14
Additional City Contribution $35,946
$35,960
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $5,032
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. 3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 11

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 98-3
Solana
Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2025 $5,752 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) ($308)
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) ($6,512)
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) ($18)
Landscaping ($3,206)
($10,044)
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($223)
Administration ($1,505)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($74)
($1,802)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail $0
Arterial Landscaping ($16,238)
Arterial Lighting ($1,898)
Parks ($14,617)
($32,753)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($5,923)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) ($254)
($6,177)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $242
Fund Balance Credit $8,547
Additional City Contribution $0
$8,547
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $36,235
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. 3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 12

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 98-4
Birchwood Estates
Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2025 $13,144 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) ($837)
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) ($18,489)
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) ($81)
Landscaping ($6,652)
($26,059)
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($574)
Administration ($3,883)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($46)
($4,503)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail $0
Arterial Landscaping ($10,100)
Arterial Lighting ($1,181)
Parks ($9,091)
($20,372)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($15,281)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) ($1,259) ($16,540)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $636
Fund Balance Credit $2,977
Additional City Contribution $19,261
$22,238
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $31,456
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. 3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 13

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 98-5
Arroya Seco
Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2025 $106 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) $0
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) ($1,522)
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) $0
Landscaping $0
($1,522)
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($35)
Administration ($235)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($59)
($329)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail ($13,132)
Arterial Landscaping ($12,872)
Arterial Lighting ($1,505)
Parks ($11,586)
($39,095)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($926)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) $0
($926)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $37
Fund Balance Credit $0
Additional City Contribution $11,177
$11,177
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $30,552
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. 3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 14

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 99-3
SPA "L"
Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2025 $125,032 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) ($17,932)
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) ($97,774)
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) ($771)
Landscaping ($147,474)
($263,951)
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($5,828)
Administration ($39,389)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($888)
($46,105)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail ($160,058)
Arterial Landscaping ($195,307)
Arterial Lighting ($22,832)
Parks ($175,781)
($553,978)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($155,028)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) ($17,594) ($172,622)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $6,553
Fund Balance Credit $0
Additional City Contribution $305,599
$305,599
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $599,472
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. 3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 15

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 99-4
California Grove
Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2025 $10,743 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) ($2,093)
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) ($13,911)
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) ($30)
Landscaping ($5,591)
($21,625)
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($477)
Administration ($3,226)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($65)
($3,768)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail ($14,546)
Arterial Landscaping ($14,258)
Arterial Lighting ($1,667)
Parks ($12,834)
($43,305)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($12,697)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) ($684)
($13,381)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $522
Fund Balance Credit $0
Additional City Contribution $28,043
$28,043
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $42,771
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. 3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 16

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 99-5
Deer Ridge Country Club
Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2025 $187,929 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) ($32,238)
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) ($130,933)
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) ($574)
Landscaping ($156,348)
($320,093)
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($7,064)
Administration ($47,748)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($952)
($55,764)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail $0
Arterial Landscaping ($214,276)
Arterial Lighting ($25,049)
Parks ($189,565)
($428,890)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($187,929)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) ($18,728) ($206,657)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $7,892
Fund Balance Credit $0
Additional City Contribution $0
$0
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $815,584
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. 3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 17

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 99-6
Trailside
Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2025 $8,890 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) ($773)
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) ($10,251)
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) ($24)
Landscaping ($4,078)
($15,126)
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($334)
Administration ($2,259)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($61)
($2,654)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail ($13,738)
Arterial Landscaping ($13,466)
Arterial Lighting ($1,574)
Parks ($12,121)
($40,899)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($8,890)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) ($1,180) ($10,070)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $379
Fund Balance Credit $2,114
Additional City Contribution $29,528
$31,642
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $27,838
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. 3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 18

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 99-7
Termo
Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2025 $65,058 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) ($7,243)
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) ($58,684)
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) ($164)
Landscaping ($44,800)
($110,891)
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($2,446)
Administration ($16,530)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($249)
($19,225)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail $0
Arterial Landscaping ($54,854)
Arterial Lighting ($6,413)
Parks ($49,375)
($110,642)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($65,058)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) ($2,923) ($67,981)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $2,661
Fund Balance Credit $4,748
Additional City Contribution $84,946
$89,694
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $151,326
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. 3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 19

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 99-8
Gerry Property
Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2025 $6,616 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) ($1,703)
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) ($5,937)
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) ($10)
Landscaping ($3,528)
($11,178)
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($249)
Administration ($1,681)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($123)
($2,053)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail $0
Arterial Landscaping ($27,130)
Arterial Lighting ($3,172)
Parks ($24,420)
($54,722)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($6,616)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) ($345)
($6,961)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $272
Fund Balance Credit $0
Additional City Contribution $0
$0
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $68,027
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. 3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 20

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 99-9
Richmond American
Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2025 $56,329 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) ($3,727)
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) ($72,199)
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) ($145)
Landscaping ($19,937)
($96,008)
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($2,117)
Administration ($14,312)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($221)
($16,650)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail $0
Arterial Landscaping ($48,517)
Arterial Lighting ($5,672)
Parks ($43,671)
($97,860)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($56,329)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) ($3,820) ($60,149)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $2,330
Fund Balance Credit $46,003
Additional City Contribution $0
$46,003
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $166,005
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. 3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 21

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 00-2
Lyon Woodfield
Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2025 ($64) In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) ($118)
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) ($5,415)
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) ($12)
Landscaping ($2,090)
($7,635)
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($170)
Administration ($1,146)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($73)
($1,389)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail ($16,364)
Arterial Landscaping ($16,040)
Arterial Lighting ($1,875)
Parks ($14,438)
($48,717)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($4,576)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) ($515)
($5,091)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $191
Fund Balance Credit $0
Additional City Contribution $8,596
$8,596
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $54,109
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. 3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 22

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 00-3
California Orchard
Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2025 $15,774 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) ($6,145)
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) ($18,042)
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) ($13)
Landscaping ($2,501)
($26,701)
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($593)
Administration ($4,008)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($245)
($4,846)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail $0
Arterial Landscaping ($55,464)
Arterial Lighting ($6,484)
Parks ($48,788)
($110,736)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($15,774)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) ($783)
($16,557)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $647
Fund Balance Credit $0
Additional City Contribution $0
$0
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $142,420
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. 3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 23

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 00-4
Brentwood Park
Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2025 $30,654 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) ($3,500)
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) ($13,824)
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) ($236)
Landscaping ($34,586)
($52,146)
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($1,152)
Administration ($7,788)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($221)
($9,161)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail $0
Arterial Landscaping ($48,517)
Arterial Lighting ($5,672)
Parks ($43,671)
($97,860)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($30,654)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) ($4,304) ($34,958)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $1,312
Fund Balance Credit $0
Additional City Contribution $0
$0
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $162,160
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. 3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 24

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 01-1
Laird Project
Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2025 $4,336 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) ($1,203)
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) ($4,966)
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) ($6)
Landscaping ($1,112)
($7,287)
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($163)
Administration ($1,102)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($120)
($1,385)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail ($26,870)
Arterial Landscaping ($26,338)
Arterial Lighting ($3,079)
Parks ($23,707)
($79,994)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($4,336)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) ($6)
($4,342)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $174
Fund Balance Credit $6,214
Additional City Contribution $0
$6,214
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $82,284
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. 3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 25

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 02-2
Oakstreet
Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2025 $132,952 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) ($8,419)
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) ($148,021)
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) ($726)
Landscaping ($69,419)
($226,585)
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($4,998)
Administration ($33,780)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($541)
($39,319)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail $0
Arterial Landscaping ($126,987)
Arterial Lighting ($14,845)
Parks ($118,269)
($260,101)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($132,952)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) ($77,523) ($210,475)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $6,869
Fund Balance Credit $0
Additional City Contribution $0
$0
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $596,659
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. 3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 26

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 02-3
Apricot Way
Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2025 $103,821 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) ($6,103)
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) ($109,731)
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) ($459)
Landscaping ($60,083)
($176,376)
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($3,903)
Administration ($26,378)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($984)
($31,265)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail ($236,274)
Arterial Landscaping ($231,646)
Arterial Lighting ($27,080)
Parks ($436,081)
($931,081)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($103,821)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) ($9,863) ($113,684)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $4,350
Fund Balance Credit $0
Additional City Contribution $0
$0
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $1,144,236
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. 3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 27

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 02-4
Bradock & Logan
Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2025 $13,573 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) ($561)
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) ($15,570)
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) ($63)
Landscaping ($6,943)
($23,137)
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($510)
Administration ($3,449)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($50)
($4,009)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail ($11,314)
Arterial Landscaping ($11,090)
Arterial Lighting ($1,296)
Parks ($9,987)
($33,687)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($13,573)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) ($1,256) ($14,829)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $568
Fund Balance Credit $1,649
Additional City Contribution $0
$1,649
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $59,872
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. 3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 28

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 02-5
Sand Creek & Brentwood Boulevard
Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2025 $1,252 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) ($118)
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) ($1,522)
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) $0
Landscaping ($367)
($2,007)
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($47)
Administration ($318)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($131)
($496)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail ($33,169)
Arterial Landscaping ($32,512)
Arterial Lighting ($3,800)
Parks ($27,716)
($97,197)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($1,252)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) $0
($1,252)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $50
Fund Balance Credit $0
Additional City Contribution $0
$0
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $99,651
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. 3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 29

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 02-6
Balfour & John Muir
Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2025 $3,461 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) ($10)
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) ($5,385)
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) ($2)
Landscaping ($478)
($5,875)
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($130)
Administration ($879)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($37)
($1,046)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail $0
Arterial Landscaping ($28,228)
Arterial Lighting ($3,300)
Parks ($9,323)
($40,851)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($3,461)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) ($319)
($3,780)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $145
Fund Balance Credit $6,315
Additional City Contribution $0
$6,315
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $41,632
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. 3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 30

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 02-7
San Jose & Sand Creek
Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2025 $214 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) $0
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) ($351)
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) $0
Landscaping $0
($351)
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($8)
Administration ($54)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($15)
($77)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail ($22,381)
Arterial Landscaping ($43,682)
Arterial Lighting ($5,106)
Parks ($31,697)
($102,866)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($214)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) $0
($214)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $9
Fund Balance Credit $0
Additional City Contribution $0
$0
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $103,285
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. 3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 31

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 02-8
Lone Tree
Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2025 $12 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) $0
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) $0
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) $0
Landscaping $0
$0
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees $0
Administration ($3)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($20)
($23)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail ($20,105)
Arterial Landscaping ($23,217)
Arterial Lighting ($2,714)
Parks ($7,647)
($53,683)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($12)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) $0
($12)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $0
Fund Balance Credit $0
Additional City Contribution $0
$0
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $53,707
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. 3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 32

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 02-9
Balfour Plaza
Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2025 $1,228 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) ($125)
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) ($412)
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) ($24)
Landscaping ($1,531)
($2,092)
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($46)
Administration ($312)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($5)
($363)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail $0
Arterial Landscaping ($3,288)
Arterial Lighting ($384)
Parks ($1,131)
($4,803)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($1,228)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) ($27)
($1,255)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $50
Fund Balance Credit $0
Additional City Contribution $0
$0
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $7,236
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. 3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 33

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 02-10
Lone Tree Center
Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2025 $18 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) $0
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) ($15)
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) $0
Landscaping $0
($15)
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($1)
Administration ($4)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($15)
($20)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail $0
Arterial Landscaping ($14,494)
Arterial Lighting ($1,694)
Parks ($4,663)
($20,851)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($18)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) $0
($18)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $1
Fund Balance Credit $583
Additional City Contribution $1,580
$2,163
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $18,723
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. 3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 34

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 02-11
Lone Tree Plaza
Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2025 $12 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) $0
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) $0
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) $0
Landscaping $0
$0
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees $0
Administration ($3)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($20)
($23)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail ($4,337)
Arterial Landscaping ($38,604)
Arterial Lighting ($4,513)
Parks ($14,027)
($61,481)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($12)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) $0
($12)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $0
Fund Balance Credit $0
Additional City Contribution $0
$0
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $61,505
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. 3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 35

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 02-12
Sunset Industrial
Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2025 $9,243 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) ($268)
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) ($6,960)
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) ($87)
Landscaping ($8,459)
($15,774)
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($347)
Administration ($2,348)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($16)
($2,711)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail ($22,713)
Arterial Landscaping ($22,264)
Arterial Lighting ($2,602)
Parks ($4,790)
($52,369)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($9,243)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) ($4,407) ($13,650)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $458
Fund Balance Credit $0
Additional City Contribution $0
$0
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $74,804
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. 3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 36

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 02-13
Stonehaven
Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2025 $778 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) $0
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) ($1,288)
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) $0
Landscaping $0
($1,288)
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($29)
Administration ($198)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($41)
($268)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail $0
Arterial Landscaping ($14,103)
Arterial Lighting ($1,649)
Parks ($8,415)
($24,167)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($778)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) ($67)
($845)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $32
Fund Balance Credit $0
Additional City Contribution $0
$0
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $25,758
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. 3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 37

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 03-2
Meritage Lone Tree
Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2025 $226,341 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) ($15,249)
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) ($213,567)
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) ($1,705)
Landscaping ($154,773)
($385,294)
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($8,508)
Administration ($57,508)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($1,372)
($67,388)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail ($153,581)
Arterial Landscaping ($305,597)
Arterial Lighting ($35,725)
Parks ($543,666)
($1,038,569)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($226,341)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) ($21,589) ($247,930)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $9,485
Fund Balance Credit $0
Additional City Contribution $0
$0
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $1,503,355
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. 3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 38

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 03-3
Brookdale Court
Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2025 $15,453 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) ($2,764)
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) ($9,506)
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) ($82)
Landscaping ($13,930)
($26,282)
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($581)
Administration ($3,926)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($116)
($4,623)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail $0
Arterial Landscaping ($25,496)
Arterial Lighting ($2,981)
Parks ($23,074)
($51,551)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($15,453)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) ($3,834) ($19,287)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $695
Fund Balance Credit $0
Additional City Contribution $0
$0
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $85,596
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. 3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 39

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 03-4
Tri City Plaza
Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2025 $3 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) $0
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) $0
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) $0
Landscaping $0
$0
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees $0
Administration ($1)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($5)
($6)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail ($2,291)
Arterial Landscaping ($6,690)
Arterial Lighting ($782)
Parks ($2,993)
($12,756)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($3)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) $0
($3)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $0
Fund Balance Credit $243
Additional City Contribution $0
$243
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $12,519
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. 3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 40

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 03-5
West Summerset
Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2025 $10,890 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) ($251)
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) ($6,795)
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) ($79)
Landscaping ($11,396)
($18,521)
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($409)
Administration ($2,767)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($82)
($3,258)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail $0
Arterial Landscaping ($20,627)
Arterial Lighting ($2,411)
Parks ($17,585)
($40,623)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($10,890)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) ($2,660) ($13,550)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $489
Fund Balance Credit $0
Additional City Contribution $0
$0
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $64,574
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. 3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 41

Landscape & Lighting Districts
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Rates APPENDIX A
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 COST ESTIMATE
Landscape & Lighting District No. 03-6
Arbor Village
Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26
Fund Balance available for Operating Reserves as of July 1, 2025 $104 In-Tract Improvement Operating Expenses
Operating (Streetlights, Garbage, etc.) $0
Utilities (Water, Electricity, etc.) ($351)
Communication (Phone for Irrigation) $0
Landscaping $0
($351)
Incidental Expenses
Assessment Engineering & Legal Fees ($9)
Administration ($61)
County Collection Fees & Investment Fees ($59)
($129)
Citywide Improvement Operating Expenses1
Grant Street Trail $0
Arterial Landscaping ($13,070)
Arterial Lighting ($1,528)
Parks ($11,765)
($26,363)
Reserves
Operating Reserves ($240)
Transfer out to Capital Reserves (708 account) $0
($240)
City Contribution for General Benefit2 $10
Fund Balance Credit $2,520
Additional City Contribution $5,877
$8,397
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED3 $18,572
1 A City account has been setup for each citywide improvement. In addition, a budget for each citywide improvement has been established. The amounts allocated above are net of any general benefits or City contributions and are to be collected within in each District and will be transferred to the applicable citywide improvement fund to pay for annual costs.
2 The costs associated with General Benefits will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. The General Benefit amounts associated with Citywide improvements were determined and will be paid for by the City using an unrestricted revenue source. 3 Amount may not foot to District levy due to County required penny rounding.

A - 42