Agenda packet — Brisbane City Council, April 2, 2026 (part 2 of 2)

EKI B50006.00 Page 9 of 12
Erler & Kalinowski, Inc.

March 2017
TABLE A-1
Summary of Manhole Attributes, Base Flows, and Modifications Sewer System Master Plan Update
City of Brisbane, California
Modeling Modifications
CIPs Since 2003 Future Base Flows
Sewer Base Flows
Rim Elevation Invert Elevation Original Updated Projected Manhole Tributary Original Updated Original Updated Sewer Flow Existing Existing Future I.D. Area (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) Land Use (gpd) (gpd) (gpd) Existing Base Flows
Added for New Construction or Missing in Original ModelRemovedRim Elevation UpdatedInvert Elevation UpdatedAdded Base Flow Consistent With Land UseScaled Existing Flows by 6.4% for Normal Growth Existing Manhole Attributes
Private Manhole?Manhole ReplacedManhole RehabilitatedAdded for New DevelopmentRelocatedRedistributed Base FlowScaled Existing Flows by 1.23 for Residential UseScaled Existing Demands by 0.83 for Non-Residential UseAdded Flows for Future Development E4-32 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 266.13 266.13 259.03 259.03 Residential 375 457 491 X X E4-33 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 254.90 254.90 248.30 248.30 Residential 375 457 491 X X E4-34 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 247.85 247.85 242.35 242.35 Residential 375 457 491 X X E4-35 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 243.37 243.37 238.07 238.07 Residential 375 457 491 X X E4-36 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 244.21 244.21 239.71 239.71 Residential 375 457 491 X X E4-37 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 243.29 243.29 236.29 236.29 Residential 375 457 491 X X E4-38 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 234.67 234.67 228.37 228.37 Residential 375 457 491 X X E4-39 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 228.41 228.41 223.11 223.11 Residential 375 457 491 X X E4-40 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 222.05 222.05 216.95 216.95 Residential 375 457 491 X X E4-41 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 217.26 217.26 212.66 212.66 Residential 375 457 491 X X E4-42 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 219.91 219.91 214.41 214.41 Residential 375 457 491 X X E4-43 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 219.04 219.04 212.24 212.24 Residential 375 457 491 X X E4-44 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 217.72 217.72 210.22 210.22 Residential 375 457 491 X X E4-45 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 217.19 217.19 209.09 209.09 Residential 375 457 491 X X E4-46 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 216.82 216.82 208.12 208.12 Residential 375 457 491 X X E4-47 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 216.80 216.80 205.80 205.80 Residential 375 457 491 X X E4-48 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 206.64 206.64 197.54 197.54 Residential 375 457 491 X X E4-49 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 197.36 197.36 191.26 191.26 Residential 375 457 491 X X E4-50 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 195.09 195.09 190.19 190.19 Residential 375 457 491 X X E4-51 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 194.21 194.21 189.51 189.51 Residential 375 457 491 X X E4-52 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 194.63 194.63 188.23 188.23 Residential 375 457 491 X X E4-53 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 194.85 194.85 181.95 181.95 Residential 375 457 491 X X E4-54 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 177.43 177.43 173.23 173.23 Residential 375 457 491 X X E4-55 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 182.73 182.73 172.63 172.63 Residential 375 457 491 X X E4-56 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 182.97 182.97 171.57 171.57 Residential 143 174 187 X X E4-57 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 181.27 181.27 171.27 171.27 Residential 143 174 187 X X E4-58 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 181.13 181.13 170.53 170.53 Residential 375 457 491 X X E4-59 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 181.37 181.37 166.17 166.17 Residential 375 457 491 X X E4-60 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 164.08 164.08 151.18 151.18 Residential 375 457 491 X X E4-62 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 53.33 53.33 43.23 43.23 Residential 143 174 187 X X E4-63 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 47.75 47.75 41.05 41.05 Non-Residential 962 756 853 X X E4-64 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 51.07 51.07 39.67 39.67 Non-Residential 962 756 853 X X E4-65 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 50.85 50.85 39.05 39.05 Non-Residential 962 756 853 X X E4-66 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 49.44 49.44 38.14 38.14 Non-Residential 962 756 853 X X E4-67 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 43.64 43.64 36.54 36.54 Non-Residential 962 756 853 X X E4-68 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 42.97 42.97 34.77 34.77 Non-Residential 962 756 853 X X E4-69 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 35.41 35.41 26.41 26.41 Non-Residential 962 756 853 X X E4-70 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 25.04 25.04 16.94 16.94 Non-Residential 962 756 853 X X E4-91 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 53.09 53.09 43.49 43.49 Non-Residential 962 756 853 X X E4-93 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 146.85 146.85 140.95 140.95 Residential 375 457 491 X X

Page 157 of 273 ends

EKI B50006.00 Page 10 of 12
Erler & Kalinowski, Inc.

March 2017
TABLE A-1
Summary of Manhole Attributes, Base Flows, and Modifications Sewer System Master Plan Update
City of Brisbane, California
Modeling Modifications
CIPs Since 2003 Future Base Flows
Sewer Base Flows
Rim Elevation Invert Elevation Original Updated Projected Manhole Tributary Original Updated Original Updated Sewer Flow Existing Existing Future I.D. Area (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) Land Use (gpd) (gpd) (gpd) Existing Base Flows
Added for New Construction or Missing in Original ModelRemovedRim Elevation UpdatedInvert Elevation UpdatedAdded Base Flow Consistent With Land UseScaled Existing Flows by 6.4% for Normal Growth Existing Manhole Attributes
Private Manhole?Manhole ReplacedManhole RehabilitatedAdded for New DevelopmentRelocatedRedistributed Base FlowScaled Existing Flows by 1.23 for Residential UseScaled Existing Demands by 0.83 for Non-Residential UseAdded Flows for Future Development E4-94 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge X 166.53 166.53 162.03 162.03 Residential 375 457 491 X X E4-95 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge X 169.71 169.71 164.61 164.61 Residential 375 457 491 X X E4-96 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge X 168.74 168.74 164.74 164.74 Residential 375 457 491 X X E4-97 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge X 182.01 182.01 177.51 177.51 Residential 375 457 491 X X E5-13 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 99.71 99.71 92.31 92.31 Non-Residential 962 756 853 X X E5-14 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 83.43 83.43 76.53 76.53 Non-Residential 962 756 853 X X E5-15 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 66.38 66.38 60.38 60.38 Non-Residential 962 756 853 X X E5-16 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 51.50 51.50 46.70 46.70 Non-Residential 962 756 853 X X E5-17 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 53.61 53.61 44.71 44.71 Non-Residential 962 756 853 X X F4-01 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 17.34 17.34 7.54 7.54 Non-Residential 962 756 853 X X X F4-02 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 14.18 14.18 6.38 6.38 Non-Residential 962 756 853 X X F4-03 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 13.58 13.58 5.58 5.58 Non-Residential 962 756 853 X X F4-04 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 12.62 12.62 4.82 4.82 Non-Residential 962 756 853 X X F4-05 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 11.68 11.68 4.08 4.08 Non-Residential 962 756 853 X X F4-06 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 96.03 96.03 87.73 87.73 Non-Residential 962 756 853 X X F4-07 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 21.83 21.83 12.93 12.93 Non-Residential / Future Laundry 962 756 72,853 X X F4-08 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 20.26 20.26 9.96 9.96 Non-Residential 962 756 853 X X F4-09 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 17.70 17.70 7.60 7.60 Non-Residential 962 756 853 X X F4-10 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 14.98 14.98 5.97 5.97 Non-Residential 962 756 853 X X F4-11 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 12.97 12.97 4.77 4.77 Non-Residential 962 756 853 X X F4-12 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 11.93 11.93 3.77 3.77 Non-Residential 962 756 853 X X F5-53 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 10.30 10.30 2.20 2.20 Non-Residential 962 756 853 X X F5-54 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 9.48 9.48 1.28 1.28 Non-Residential 962 756 853 X X F5-55 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 10.58 10.58 2.48 2.48 Non-Residential 962 756 853 X X F5-57 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 13.96 13.96 8.56 8.56 Non-Residential 962 756 853 X X F5-58 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 12.92 12.92 7.22 7.22 Non-Residential 962 756 853 X X F5-59 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 12.04 12.04 6.39 6.39 Non-Residential 962 756 853 X X F5-60 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 11.14 11.14 5.54 5.54 Non-Residential 962 756 853 X X F5-61 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 10.03 10.03 3.48 3.48 Non-Residential 962 756 853 X X F5-62 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 8.66 8.66 0.96 0.96 Non-Residential 962 756 853 X X F5-63 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 9.55 9.55 -3.25 -3.25 Non-Residential 962 756 853 X X E3-01 Guadalupe Canyon 229.15 229.15 211.45 211.45 - 0 0 0 E3-02 Guadalupe Canyon 220.90 220.90 203.20 203.20 - 0 0 0 E3-03 Guadalupe Canyon 212.40 212.40 194.70 194.70 - 0 0 0 E3-04 Guadalupe Canyon 210.15 210.15 192.45 192.45 - 0 0 0 E3-05 Guadalupe Canyon 198.50 198.50 180.80 180.80 - 0 0 0 E3-06 Guadalupe Canyon 186.35 186.35 168.65 168.65 - 0 0 0 E3-07 Guadalupe Canyon 174.50 174.50 156.80 156.80 - 0 0 0 E3-08 Guadalupe Canyon 171.60 171.60 153.90 153.90 - 0 0 0 E3-09 Guadalupe Canyon 157.35 157.35 139.65 139.65 - 0 0 0

Page 158 of 273 ends

EKI B50006.00 Page 11 of 12
Erler & Kalinowski, Inc.

March 2017
TABLE A-1
Summary of Manhole Attributes, Base Flows, and Modifications Sewer System Master Plan Update
City of Brisbane, California
Modeling Modifications
CIPs Since 2003 Future Base Flows
Sewer Base Flows
Rim Elevation Invert Elevation Original Updated Projected Manhole Tributary Original Updated Original Updated Sewer Flow Existing Existing Future I.D. Area (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) Land Use (gpd) (gpd) (gpd) Existing Base Flows
Added for New Construction or Missing in Original ModelRemovedRim Elevation UpdatedInvert Elevation UpdatedAdded Base Flow Consistent With Land UseScaled Existing Flows by 6.4% for Normal Growth Existing Manhole Attributes
Private Manhole?Manhole ReplacedManhole RehabilitatedAdded for New DevelopmentRelocatedRedistributed Base FlowScaled Existing Flows by 1.23 for Residential UseScaled Existing Demands by 0.83 for Non-Residential UseAdded Flows for Future Development E3-10 Guadalupe Canyon 141.35 141.35 123.65 123.65 - 0 0 0 E3-11 Guadalupe Canyon 220.52 220.52 215.82 215.82 Residential 312 380 409 X X E3-12 Guadalupe Canyon 205.20 205.20 197.80 197.80 Residential 312 380 409 X X E3-13 Guadalupe Canyon 193.19 193.19 186.29 186.29 Residential 312 380 409 X X E3-14 Guadalupe Canyon 155.96 155.96 138.26 138.26 - 0 0 0 E3-15 Guadalupe Canyon 127.60 127.60 109.90 109.90 - 0 0 0 E3-16 Guadalupe Canyon 117.85 117.85 100.15 100.15 - 0 0 0 E4-71 Guadalupe Canyon 234.51 234.51 226.21 226.21 Residential 312 380 409 X X E4-72 Guadalupe Canyon 228.15 228.15 222.35 222.35 Residential 312 380 409 X X E4-73 Guadalupe Canyon 204.05 204.05 197.75 197.75 Residential 312 380 409 X X E4-74 Guadalupe Canyon 199.33 199.33 195.33 195.33 Residential 312 380 409 X X E4-75 Guadalupe Canyon 195.13 195.13 190.73 190.73 Residential 312 380 409 X X E4-76 Guadalupe Canyon 190.98 190.98 182.38 182.38 Residential 312 380 409 X X E4-77 Guadalupe Canyon 179.05 179.05 171.45 171.45 Residential 312 380 409 X X E4-78 Guadalupe Canyon 173.82 173.82 168.52 168.52 - 0 0 0 E4-79 Guadalupe Canyon 226.29 226.29 220.69 220.69 Residential 312 380 409 X X E4-80 Guadalupe Canyon 220.96 220.96 216.16 216.16 Residential 312 380 409 X X E4-81 Guadalupe Canyon 219.55 219.55 213.85 213.85 Residential 312 380 409 X X X E4-82 Guadalupe Canyon 217.92 217.92 209.62 209.62 Residential 312 380 409 X X E4-83 Guadalupe Canyon 204.26 204.26 197.36 197.36 Residential 312 380 409 X X E4-84 Guadalupe Canyon 175.90 175.90 167.80 167.80 - 0 0 0 E4-85 Guadalupe Canyon 172.02 172.02 166.42 166.42 - 0 0 0 E4-86 Guadalupe Canyon 170.97 170.97 164.97 164.97 - 0 0 0 E4-87 Guadalupe Canyon 170.06 170.06 162.46 162.46 - 0 0 0 E4-88 Guadalupe Canyon 167.75 167.75 158.85 158.85 - 0 0 0 E4-89 Guadalupe Canyon 165.37 165.37 161.27 161.27 - 0 0 0 E4-90 Guadalupe Canyon 166.81 166.81 157.01 157.01 - 0 0 0 F4-13 Guadalupe Canyon 130.35 130.35 115.53 115.53 - 0 0 0 F4-14 Guadalupe Canyon 109.39 109.39 91.69 91.69 - 0 0 0 F4-15 Guadalupe Canyon 102.97 102.97 85.27 85.27 - 0 0 0 F4-16 Guadalupe Canyon 97.15 97.15 79.45 79.45 - 0 0 0
G7-06 Sierra Point 18.63 18.63 6.33 6.33 - 0 0 0
G7-07 Sierra Point 22.02 22.02 14.02 14.02 Non-Residential 6,130 4,818 5,438 X X G7-08 Sierra Point 21.32 21.32 7.92 7.92 Non-Residential 6,130 4,818 5,438 X X G7-10 Sierra Point 16.64 16.64 9.04 9.04 Non-Residential / Future Parcel 3 6,130 4,818 19,568 X X X X G7-11 Sierra Point 18.16 18.16 12.46 12.46 Non-Residential / Future Biotech 6,130 4,818 27,838 X X X G7-12 Sierra Point 17.84 17.84 13.54 13.54 Non-Residential 6,130 4,818 5,438 X X G7-13 Sierra Point 18.25 18.25 14.85 14.85 Non-Residential 6,130 4,818 5,438 X X G7-14 Sierra Point 16.68 16.68 10.28 10.28 Non-Residential 6,130 4,818 5,438 X X H7-01 Sierra Point 16.06 16.06 11.46 11.46 Non-Residential / Future Biotech 6,130 4,818 27,838 X X X

Page 159 of 273 ends

EKI B50006.00 Page 12 of 12
Erler & Kalinowski, Inc.

CIP = Capital Improvement Project
gpd = gallons per day
SFPUC = San Francisco Public Utilities Commission

Page 160 of 273 ends

EKI B50006.00 Page 1 of 7
Erler & Kalinowski, Inc.

March 2017
TABLE A-2
Summary of Gravity Sewer Attributes and Modifications
Sewer System Master Plan Update
City of Brisbane, California
CIPs Since 2003 Existing Sewer Attributes
Upstream Downstream
Upstream Downstream Diameter Material (a) Length Invert Elevation Invert Elevation Slope Design Capacity (b) Manhole Manhole Tributary Original Updated Original Updated Original Updated Original Updated Original Updated Original Updated Original Updated I.D. I.D. Area (inches) (inches) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet/feet) (feet/feet) (mgd) (mgd) (gal/day) (ft/s) (%) (ft) (ft) D3-01 D3-02 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 6 6 PVC PVC 179 179 307.93 290.40 302.56 289.40 0.030 0.006 0.408 0.176 2,455 0.63 1.4 0.03 0.03 Subcritical X D3-02 D3-03 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 6 6 PVC PVC 144 144 302.56 289.40 298.24 288.40 0.030 0.007 0.408 0.196 4,910 0.83 2.5 0.04 0.04 Subcritical X D3-03 D3-04 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 6 6 PVC PVC 178 178 298.24 288.40 292.90 287.20 0.030 0.007 0.408 0.194 7,364 0.96 3.8 0.05 0.05 Subcritical X D3-04 D3-05 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 6 6 PVC PVC 193 193 292.90 287.20 287.11 285.80 0.030 0.007 0.408 0.201 9,819 1.06 4.9 0.05 0.06 Supercritical X D3-05 D3-06 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 6 6 PVC PVC 72 72 287.11 285.80 284.95 284.00 0.030 0.025 0.408 0.373 12,274 1.14 3.3 0.04 0.07 Supercritical X D3-06 D3-07 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 6 6 PVC PVC 80 69 284.95 284.00 282.55 282.55 0.030 0.021 0.408 0.342 14,729 0.93 4.3 0.05 0.07 Supercritical X X D3-07 D3-08 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 8 8 PVC PVC 110 110 282.55 282.55 270.69 270.69 0.108 0.108 1.667 1.667 48,894 1.64 2.9 0.06 0.13 Supercritical D3-08 D3-09 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 8 8 PVC PVC 133 133 270.69 270.69 254.62 254.62 0.121 0.121 1.765 1.765 51,349 1.67 2.9 0.06 0.13 Supercritical D3-09 D3-10 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 8 8 PVC PVC 108 108 254.62 254.62 246.40 246.40 0.076 0.076 1.400 1.400 53,804 1.69 3.8 0.06 0.13 Supercritical D3-10 D3-14 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 8 8 PVC PVC 73 73 246.40 246.40 242.27 242.27 0.057 0.057 1.207 1.207 56,259 1.5 4.7 0.07 0.13 Supercritical D3-11 D3-12 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 6 6 PVC PVC 67 99 249.80 266.20 247.79 256.70 0.030 0.096 0.408 0.730 23,595 1.39 3.2 0.04 0.09 Supercritical X X D3-12 D3-13 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 6 6 PVC PVC 140 140 247.79 256.70 243.59 243.50 0.030 0.094 0.408 0.724 26,050 1.44 3.6 0.05 0.1 Supercritical X D3-13 D3-14 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 6 6 PVC PVC 44 37 243.59 243.50 242.27 242.27 0.030 0.033 0.408 0.430 28,505 1.14 6.6 0.06 0.1 Supercritical X X D3-14 D3-18 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 8 8 PVC PVC 157 157 242.27 242.27 228.33 228.33 0.089 0.089 1.513 1.513 87,218 1.88 5.8 0.08 0.17 Supercritical D3-15 D3-16 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 6 6 PVC PVC 243 243 245.19 248.00 237.90 244.00 0.030 0.016 0.408 0.302 2,455 0.64 0.8 0.02 0.03 Supercritical X D3-16 D3-17 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 6 6 PVC PVC 243 243 237.90 244.00 230.61 230.70 0.030 0.055 0.408 0.551 4,910 0.83 0.9 0.02 0.04 Supercritical X D3-17 D3-18 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 8 6 PVC PVC 76 87 230.61 230.70 228.33 228.33 0.030 0.027 0.879 0.389 7,364 0.62 1.9 0.03 0.05 Supercritical X X X D3-18 D3-19 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 8 8 PVC PVC 174 174 228.33 228.33 209.73 209.73 0.107 0.107 1.660 1.660 97,037 2 5.8 0.08 0.18 Supercritical D3-19 D3-20 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 8 8 PVC PVC 159 159 209.73 209.73 192.97 192.97 0.105 0.105 1.648 1.648 99,492 2.01 6 0.08 0.18 Supercritical D3-20 D3-21 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 8 8 PVC PVC 106 106 192.97 192.97 180.69 180.69 0.116 0.116 1.728 1.728 101,947 2.03 5.9 0.08 0.18 Supercritical D3-21 D3-38 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 8 8 PVC PVC 182 182 180.69 180.69 167.57 167.57 0.072 0.072 1.363 1.363 104,402 1.79 7.7 0.09 0.18 Supercritical D3-22 D3-23 X Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 8 8 PVC PVC 96 96 229.62 229.62 227.71 227.71 0.020 0.020 0.716 0.716 2,455 0.61 0.3 0.02 0.03 Supercritical D3-23 D3-24 X Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 8 8 PVC PVC 121 121 227.71 227.71 224.42 224.42 0.027 0.027 0.837 0.837 4,910 0.8 0.6 0.03 0.04 Supercritical D3-24 D3-25 X Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 8 8 PVC PVC 102 102 224.42 224.42 222.12 222.12 0.023 0.023 0.762 0.762 7,364 0.92 1 0.03 0.05 Supercritical D3-25 D3-26 X Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 8 8 PVC PVC 137 137 222.12 222.12 216.36 216.36 0.042 0.042 1.041 1.041 9,819 1.02 0.9 0.03 0.06 Supercritical D3-26 D3-27 X Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 8 8 PVC PVC 44 44 216.36 216.36 213.06 213.06 0.075 0.075 1.390 1.390 12,274 1.09 0.9 0.03 0.06 Supercritical D3-27 D3-28 X Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 8 8 PVC PVC 21 21 213.06 213.06 211.95 211.95 0.053 0.053 1.167 1.167 14,729 1.15 1.3 0.04 0.07 Supercritical D3-28 D3-29 X Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 8 8 PVC PVC 166 166 211.95 211.95 205.33 205.33 0.040 0.040 1.014 1.014 17,184 1.21 1.7 0.04 0.07 Supercritical D3-29 D3-30 X Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 8 8 PVC PVC 176 176 205.33 205.33 190.83 190.83 0.082 0.082 1.457 1.457 19,639 1.26 1.3 0.04 0.08 Supercritical D3-30 D3-31 X Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 8 8 PVC PVC 48 48 190.83 190.83 187.84 187.84 0.062 0.062 1.267 1.267 22,093 1.31 1.7 0.04 0.08 Supercritical D3-31 D3-32 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 8 8 PVC PVC 163 163 187.84 187.84 185.74 185.74 0.013 0.013 0.576 0.576 24,548 1.35 4.3 0.07 0.09 Supercritical D3-32 D3-33 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 8 8 PVC PVC 103 103 185.74 185.74 184.50 184.50 0.012 0.012 0.560 0.560 27,003 1.23 4.8 0.07 0.09 Supercritical D3-33 D3-34 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 8 8 PVC PVC 108 108 184.50 184.50 182.12 182.12 0.022 0.022 0.757 0.757 41,732 1.57 5.5 0.08 0.12 Supercritical D3-34 D3-35 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 8 8 PVC PVC 185 185 182.12 182.12 178.23 178.23 0.021 0.021 0.736 0.736 44,187 1.59 6 0.08 0.12 Supercritical D3-35 D3-36 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 8 8 PVC PVC 158 158 178.23 178.23 174.52 174.52 0.023 0.023 0.778 0.778 46,642 1.62 6 0.08 0.12 Supercritical D3-36 D3-37 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 8 8 PVC PVC 188 188 174.52 174.52 168.77 168.77 0.031 0.031 0.888 0.888 49,097 1.64 5.5 0.08 0.13 Supercritical D3-37 D3-38 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 8 8 PVC PVC 46 46 168.77 168.77 167.57 167.57 0.026 0.026 0.820 0.820 51,551 1.23 6.3 0.08 0.13 Supercritical D3-38 D3-39 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 8 8 PVC PVC 187 187 167.57 167.57 153.27 153.27 0.076 0.076 1.404 1.404 158,408 2.31 11.3 0.11 0.23 Supercritical D3-39 D3-40 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 8 8 PVC PVC 58 58 153.27 153.27 148.78 148.78 0.079 0.079 1.425 1.425 160,863 2.32 11.3 0.11 0.23 Supercritical D3-40 D3-43 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 8 8 PVC PVC 57 57 148.78 148.78 148.39 148.39 0.007 0.007 0.420 0.420 163,318 2.61 38.9 0.2 0.23 Supercritical D3-41 D4-04 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 8 8 VCP VCP 193 193 208.42 208.42 199.85 199.85 0.044 0.044 0.972 0.972 4,265 0.71 0.5 0.03 0.04 Supercritical D3-42 D3-43 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 15 15 VCP VCP 121 121 154.24 154.24 148.39 148.39 0.048 0.048 8.510 8.510 21,327 0.74 0.3 0.04 0.07 Supercritical D3-43 D3-44 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 15 15 VCP VCP 196 196 148.39 148.39 136.94 136.94 0.058 0.058 9.354 9.354 187,099 2.14 2.4 0.12 0.21 Supercritical D3-44 D4-08 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 15 15 VCP VCP 195 195 136.94 136.94 127.18 127.18 0.050 0.050 8.659 8.659 189,554 2.14 2.6 0.12 0.21 Supercritical D3-45 D3-46 X Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 8 8 VCP VCP 130 130 209.73 209.73 203.72 203.72 0.046 0.046 0.992 0.992 2,455 0.61 0.3 0.02 0.03 Supercritical D3-46 D3-47 X Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 8 8 VCP VCP 159 159 203.72 203.72 198.69 198.69 0.032 0.032 0.821 0.821 4,910 0.8 0.7 0.03 0.04 Supercritical D3-47 D3-48 X Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 8 8 VCP VCP 113 113 198.69 198.69 197.25 197.25 0.013 0.013 0.521 0.521 7,364 0.92 1.7 0.04 0.05 Supercritical D3-48 D3-49 X Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 8 8 VCP VCP 104 104 197.25 197.25 185.09 185.09 0.117 0.117 1.578 1.578 9,819 1.02 0.7 0.03 0.06 Supercritical D3-49 D3-33 X Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 8 8 VCP VCP 32 32 185.09 185.09 184.50 184.50 0.018 0.018 0.627 0.627 12,274 0.82 2.3 0.05 0.06 Supercritical D3-50 D3-11 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge - 6 - PVC - 68 - 274.60 - 266.20 - 0.124 - 0.828 21,140 1.35 2.6 0.04 0.09 Supercritical X D3-51 D3-50 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge - 6 - PVC - 87 - 277.90 - 274.60 - 0.038 - 0.459 21,140 2.19 4.6 0.05 0.09 Supercritical X D3-52 D3-51 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge - 6 - PVC - 100 - 279.71 - 277.90 - 0.018 - 0.317 21,140 1.86 6.7 0.06 0.09 Supercritical X D3-53 D3-52 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge - 8 - PVC - 71 - 286.09 - 279.81 - 0.088 - 1.510 19,026 2.51 1.3 0.04 0.08 Supercritical X D3-54 D3-53 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge - 8 - PVC - 144 - 294.92 - 286.19 - 0.061 - 1.250 16,912 2.2 1.4 0.04 0.07 Supercritical X D3-55 D3-54 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge - 8 - PVC - 63 - 298.72 - 295.02 - 0.059 - 1.230 14,798 2.1 1.2 0.04 0.07 Supercritical X D3-56 D3-55 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge - 8 - PVC - 97 - 304.51 - 298.82 - 0.059 - 1.229 12,684 2.01 1 0.03 0.06 Supercritical X D3-57 D3-56 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge - 8 - PVC - 101 - 311.93 - 304.61 - 0.072 - 1.367 10,570 2.01 0.8 0.03 0.06 Supercritical X D3-58 D3-57 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge - 8 - PVC - 101 - 317.94 - 312.03 - 0.059 - 1.228 8,456 1.8 0.7 0.03 0.05 Supercritical X D3-59 D3-58 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge - 8 - PVC - 89 - 322.40 - 318.04 - 0.049 - 1.124 6,342 1.58 0.6 0.03 0.04 Supercritical X D3-60 D3-59 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge - 8 - PVC - 274 - 336.78 - 322.50 - 0.052 - 1.159 4,228 1.41 0.4 0.02 0.04 Supercritical X D3-61 D3-60 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge - 8 - PVC - 91 - 337.79 - 336.88 - 0.010 - 0.508 2,114 0.82 0.4 0.02 0.03 Supercritical X D3-62 D3-63 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge - 8 - PVC - 283 - 364.15 - 360.54 - 0.013 - 0.573 6,342 1.17 1.1 0.04 0.04 Subcritical X D3-63 D3-64 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge - 8 - PVC - 94 - 360.44 - 359.50 - 0.010 - 0.508 8,456 1.21 1.7 0.04 0.05 Supercritical X D3-64 D3-68 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge - 8 - PVC - 258 - 359.40 - 333.60 - 0.100 - 1.605 16,912 2.51 1.1 0.03 0.07 Supercritical X D3-65 D3-64 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge - 8 - PVC - 165 - 370.32 - 359.50 - 0.066 - 1.300 6,342 1.69 0.5 0.02 0.04 Supercritical X D3-66 D3-65 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge - 8 - PVC - 112 - 381.60 - 370.42 - 0.100 - 1.604 4,228 1.68 0.3 0.02 0.04 Supercritical X D3-67 D3-66 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge - 8 - PVC - 172 - 384.28 - 381.70 - 0.015 - 0.622 2,114 0.88 0.3 0.02 0.03 Supercritical X Sewer Replaced (Diameter / Material / Inverts Updated) Sewer Spot Repaired (*Does Not Affect Model) New Development Sewer Added for Sewer Added for
Completeness
Flow Velocity
Ratio of
Modeled Peak
Flow to Design
Criteria
Depth
(Normal)
Depth
(Critical) State of Flow
Hydraulic Modeling Results
Modeling Modifications Sewer Removed Realigned (Length Modified) Diameter Updated
Material Updated
Invert Elevation(s)
Updated

Page 161 of 273 ends

EKI B50006.00 Page 2 of 7
Erler & Kalinowski, Inc.

March 2017
TABLE A-2
Summary of Gravity Sewer Attributes and Modifications
Sewer System Master Plan Update
City of Brisbane, California
CIPs Since 2003 Existing Sewer Attributes
Upstream Downstream
Upstream Downstream Diameter Material (a) Length Invert Elevation Invert Elevation Slope Design Capacity (b) Manhole Manhole Tributary Original Updated Original Updated Original Updated Original Updated Original Updated Original Updated Original Updated I.D. I.D. Area (inches) (inches) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet/feet) (feet/feet) (mgd) (mgd) (gal/day) (ft/s) (%) (ft) (ft) Sewer Replaced
(Diameter / Material
/ Inverts Updated)
Sewer Spot
Repaired (*Does Not
Affect Model)
New Development
Sewer Added for Sewer Added for
Completeness
Flow Velocity
Ratio of
Modeled Peak
Flow to Design
Criteria
Depth
(Normal)
Depth
(Critical) State of Flow
Hydraulic Modeling Results
Modeling Modifications Sewer Removed Realigned (Length Modified) Diameter Updated
Material Updated
Invert Elevation(s)
Updated
D3-68 D3-69 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge - 8 - PVC - 111 - 333.50 - 324.62 - 0.080 - 1.436 25,368 2.65 1.8 0.04 0.09 Supercritical X D3-69 D3-70 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge - 8 - PVC - 52 - 324.52 - 319.67 - 0.093 - 1.550 27,482 2.83 1.8 0.04 0.09 Supercritical X D3-70 D3-76 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge - 8 - PVC - 226 - 319.57 - 299.95 - 0.087 - 1.496 31,710 2.9 2.1 0.05 0.1 Supercritical X D3-71 D3-72 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge - 8 - PVC - 195 - 346.32 - 344.37 - 0.010 - 0.508 2,114 0.82 0.4 0.02 0.03 Supercritical X D3-72 D3-73 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge - 8 - PVC - 75 - 344.27 - 337.74 - 0.087 - 1.498 4,228 1.62 0.3 0.02 0.04 Supercritical X D3-73 D3-68 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge - 8 - PVC - 101 - 337.64 - 333.60 - 0.040 - 1.015 6,342 1.49 0.6 0.03 0.04 Supercritical X D3-74 D3-75 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge - 8 - PVC - 272 - 323.05 - 320.21 - 0.010 - 0.519 2,114 0.83 0.4 0.02 0.03 Supercritical X D3-75 D3-70 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge - 8 - PVC - 44 - 320.11 - 319.67 - 0.010 - 0.508 4,228 1 0.8 0.03 0.04 Supercritical X D3-76 D3-77 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge - 8 - PVC - 123 - 299.85 - 291.40 - 0.069 - 1.331 31,710 2.73 2.4 0.05 0.1 Supercritical X D3-77 D3-07 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge - 8 - PVC - 54 - 291.30 - 285.20 - 0.113 - 1.706 31,710 3.1 1.9 0.05 0.1 Supercritical X D4-01 D4-02 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 8 8 VCP VCP 250 250 133.74 133.74 124.39 124.39 0.037 0.037 0.892 0.892 4,265 0.71 0.6 0.03 0.04 Supercritical D4-02 D4-03 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 8 8 VCP VCP 105 105 124.39 124.39 122.92 122.92 0.014 0.014 0.546 0.546 8,531 0.92 1.8 0.05 0.05 Subcritical D4-03 E4-01 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 8 8 VCP VCP 298 298 122.92 122.92 119.04 119.04 0.013 0.013 0.527 0.527 12,796 1.06 2.9 0.06 0.06 Subcritical D4-04 D4-05 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 8 8 VCP VCP 301 301 199.85 199.85 186.49 186.49 0.044 0.044 0.972 0.972 8,531 0.92 1 0.03 0.05 Supercritical D4-05 D4-06 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 8 8 VCP VCP 271 271 186.49 186.49 178.55 178.55 0.029 0.029 0.791 0.791 12,796 1.06 1.9 0.05 0.06 Supercritical D4-06 D4-07 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 8 8 VCP VCP 244 244 178.55 178.55 172.24 172.24 0.026 0.026 0.742 0.742 17,061 1.17 2.7 0.05 0.07 Supercritical D4-07 D3-42 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 8 8 VCP VCP 267 267 172.24 172.24 154.24 154.24 0.067 0.067 1.198 1.198 21,327 2.13 2.1 0.05 0.08 Supercritical D4-08 D4-09 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 15 15 VCP VCP 308 308 127.18 127.18 121.40 121.40 0.019 0.019 5.302 5.302 193,819 2.15 4.3 0.16 0.21 Supercritical D4-09 D4-10 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 15 15 VCP VCP 360 360 121.40 121.40 114.77 114.77 0.018 0.018 5.252 5.252 198,085 2.17 4.5 0.16 0.21 Supercritical D4-10 D4-11 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 15 15 VCP VCP 447 447 114.77 114.77 100.91 100.91 0.031 0.031 6.815 6.815 202,350 2.18 3.5 0.14 0.22 Supercritical D4-11 E4-04 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 15 15 VCP VCP 350 350 100.91 100.91 90.06 90.06 0.031 0.031 6.814 6.814 206,615 2.19 3.6 0.14 0.22 Supercritical D4-12 D4-13 X Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 6 6 PVC PVC 96 96 170.82 170.82 111.00 111.00 0.623 0.623 1.861 1.861 2,455 2.48 0.1 0.01 0.03 Supercritical D4-13 D4-14 X Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 6 6 PVC PVC 24 24 111.00 111.00 109.31 109.31 0.070 0.070 0.625 0.625 2,455 0.61 0.4 0.02 0.03 Supercritical D4-14 D4-15 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 8 8 PVC PVC 271 271 109.31 109.31 100.84 100.84 0.031 0.031 0.897 0.897 6,720 0.85 0.7 0.03 0.05 Supercritical D4-15 E4-16 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 8 8 VCP VCP 118 118 100.84 100.84 98.08 98.08 0.023 0.023 0.706 0.706 10,985 0.96 1.8 0.05 0.06 Supercritical D4-16 D4-15 X Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 8 8 VCP VCP 23 23 104.23 104.23 100.84 100.84 0.147 0.147 1.772 1.772 0 0 0 (N/A) 0 Subcritical E3-01 E3-02 Guadalupe Canyon 8 8 PVC PVC 165 165 211.45 211.45 203.20 203.20 0.050 0.050 1.135 1.135 0 0 0 (N/A) 0 Subcritical E3-02 E3-03 Guadalupe Canyon 8 8 PVC PVC 170 170 203.20 203.20 194.70 194.70 0.050 0.050 1.135 1.135 0 0 0 (N/A) 0 Subcritical E3-03 E3-04 Guadalupe Canyon 8 8 PVC PVC 45 45 194.70 194.70 192.45 192.45 0.050 0.050 1.135 1.135 0 0 0 (N/A) 0 Subcritical E3-04 E3-05 Guadalupe Canyon 8 8 PVC PVC 233 233 192.45 192.45 180.80 180.80 0.050 0.050 1.135 1.135 0 0 0 (N/A) 0 Subcritical E3-05 E3-06 Guadalupe Canyon 8 8 PVC PVC 243 243 180.80 180.80 168.65 168.65 0.050 0.050 1.135 1.135 0 0 0 (N/A) 0 Subcritical E3-06 E3-08 Guadalupe Canyon 8 8 PVC PVC 295 295 168.65 168.65 153.90 153.90 0.050 0.050 1.135 1.135 0 0 0 (N/A) 0 Subcritical E3-07 E3-08 Guadalupe Canyon 8 8 PVC PVC 58 58 156.80 156.80 153.90 153.90 0.050 0.050 1.135 1.135 0 0 0 (N/A) 0 Subcritical E3-08 E3-09 Guadalupe Canyon 8 8 PVC PVC 285 285 153.90 153.90 139.65 139.65 0.050 0.050 1.135 1.135 0 0 0 (N/A) 0 Subcritical E3-09 E3-10 Guadalupe Canyon 8 8 PVC PVC 320 320 139.65 139.65 123.65 123.65 0.050 0.050 1.135 1.135 0 0 0 (N/A) 0 Subcritical E3-10 E3-15 Guadalupe Canyon 8 8 PVC PVC 279 279 123.65 123.65 109.90 109.90 0.049 0.049 1.127 1.127 0 0 0 (N/A) 0 Subcritical E3-11 E3-12 Guadalupe Canyon 8 8 PVC PVC 206 206 215.82 215.82 197.80 197.80 0.087 0.087 1.501 1.501 6,134 0.88 0.4 0.02 0.04 Supercritical E3-12 E3-13 Guadalupe Canyon 8 8 PVC PVC 197 197 197.80 197.80 186.29 186.29 0.058 0.058 1.227 1.227 8,179 0.96 0.7 0.03 0.05 Supercritical E3-13 E3-14 Guadalupe Canyon 8 8 PVC PVC 127 127 186.29 186.29 138.26 138.26 0.378 0.378 3.122 3.122 10,224 3.09 0.3 0.02 0.06 Supercritical E3-14 E3-15 Guadalupe Canyon 8 8 PVC PVC 83 83 138.26 138.26 109.90 109.90 0.342 0.342 2.967 2.967 10,224 2.99 0.3 0.02 0.06 Supercritical E3-15 E3-16 Guadalupe Canyon 8 8 PVC PVC 321 321 109.90 109.90 100.15 100.15 0.030 0.030 0.885 0.885 10,224 1.61 1.2 0.04 0.06 Supercritical E3-16 F4-14 Guadalupe Canyon 8 8 PVC PVC 282 282 100.15 100.15 91.69 91.69 0.030 0.030 0.879 0.879 10,224 0.8 1.2 0.04 0.06 Supercritical E3-17 E3-18 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 6 6 PVC PVC 116 116 251.80 251.80 249.36 249.36 0.021 0.021 0.342 0.342 2,455 0.64 0.7 0.02 0.03 Supercritical E3-18 E3-19 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 6 6 PVC PVC 155 155 249.36 249.36 247.56 247.56 0.012 0.012 0.254 0.254 4,910 0.83 1.9 0.03 0.04 Supercritical E3-19 E3-20 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 6 6 PVC PVC 161 161 247.56 247.56 244.20 244.20 0.021 0.021 0.341 0.341 7,364 0.96 2.2 0.04 0.05 Supercritical E3-20 E4-34 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 6 6 PVC PVC 107 107 244.20 244.20 242.35 242.35 0.017 0.017 0.310 0.310 9,819 1.06 3.2 0.04 0.06 Supercritical E3-21 E4-32 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 8 8 PVC PVC 234 234 285.36 285.36 259.03 259.03 0.113 0.113 1.703 1.703 2,455 0.52 0.1 0.01 0.03 Supercritical E3-22 E3-23 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge - 8 - PVC - 163 - 373.31 - 370.87 - 0.015 - 0.621 2,114 0.88 0.3 0.02 0.03 Supercritical X E3-23 D3-62 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge - 8 - PVC - 182 - 370.77 - 364.25 - 0.036 - 0.961 4,228 1.3 0.4 0.02 0.04 Supercritical X E4-01 E4-02 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 8 8 VCP VCP 305 305 119.04 119.04 115.82 115.82 0.011 0.011 0.474 0.474 17,061 1.17 4.3 0.07 0.07 Subcritical E4-02 E4-03 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 8 8 VCP VCP 300 300 115.82 115.82 104.41 104.41 0.038 0.038 0.900 0.900 21,327 1.26 2.8 0.06 0.08 Supercritical E4-03 E5-13 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 8 8 VCP VCP 301 301 104.41 104.41 92.31 92.31 0.040 0.040 0.925 0.925 25,592 1.33 3.3 0.06 0.09 Supercritical E4-04 E4-06 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 15 15 VCP VCP 514 514 90.06 90.06 74.12 74.12 0.031 0.031 6.816 6.816 210,881 2.21 3.7 0.15 0.22 Supercritical E4-06 E4-08 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 15 15 VCP VCP 768 768 74.12 74.12 52.42 52.42 0.028 0.028 6.506 6.506 215,146 2.22 3.9 0.15 0.22 Supercritical E4-08 E4-09 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 15 15 PVC PVC 367 367 52.42 52.42 45.09 45.09 0.020 0.020 6.017 6.017 219,411 2.23 3.6 0.15 0.23 Supercritical E4-09 E4-12 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 15 15 VCP VCP 199 199 45.09 45.09 41.12 41.12 0.020 0.020 5.467 5.467 223,677 2.08 4.8 0.17 0.23 Supercritical E4-11 E4-12 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 8 8 VCP VCP 93 93 42.62 42.62 41.12 41.12 0.016 0.016 0.586 0.586 4,265 0.47 0.9 0.03 0.04 Supercritical E4-12 E4-68 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 15 15 VCP VCP 303 303 41.12 41.12 34.77 34.77 0.021 0.021 5.603 5.603 283,391 2.07 6 0.18 0.26 Supercritical E4-14 E4-16 X Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 6 6 PVC PVC 177 177 186.48 186.48 98.08 98.08 0.499 0.499 1.666 1.666 2,455 0.5 0.1 0.01 0.03 Supercritical E4-16 E4-19 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 8 8 PVC PVC 339 339 98.08 98.08 90.92 90.92 0.021 0.021 0.738 0.738 17,706 1.04 2.4 0.05 0.07 Supercritical E4-17 E4-18 X Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 6 6 VCP VCP 128 128 151.91 151.91 91.24 91.24 0.474 0.474 1.475 1.475 12,274 3.14 1 0.03 0.07 Supercritical E4-18 E4-19 X Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 6 6 VCP VCP 25 25 91.24 91.24 90.92 90.92 0.013 0.013 0.242 0.242 12,274 0.93 6 0.06 0.07 Supercritical E4-19 E4-20 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 8 8 PVC PVC 169 169 90.92 90.92 85.08 85.08 0.035 0.035 0.944 0.944 34,245 2.36 3.6 0.06 0.1 Supercritical E4-20 E4-22 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 8 8 PVC PVC 198 198 85.08 85.08 78.59 78.59 0.033 0.033 0.919 0.919 34,245 1.45 3.7 0.06 0.1 Supercritical E4-21 E4-22 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 6 6 PVC PVC 141 141 134.24 134.24 78.59 78.59 0.395 0.395 1.481 1.481 4,910 0.59 0.3 0.02 0.04 Supercritical E4-22 E4-23 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 8 8 PVC PVC 246 246 78.59 78.59 76.14 76.14 0.010 0.010 0.507 0.507 39,155 1.87 7.7 0.09 0.11 Supercritical E4-23 E4-24 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 8 8 PVC PVC 161 161 76.14 76.14 72.53 72.53 0.022 0.022 0.760 0.760 39,155 2.22 5.2 0.07 0.11 Supercritical

Page 162 of 273 ends

EKI B50006.00 Page 3 of 7
Erler & Kalinowski, Inc.

March 2017
TABLE A-2
Summary of Gravity Sewer Attributes and Modifications
Sewer System Master Plan Update
City of Brisbane, California
CIPs Since 2003 Existing Sewer Attributes
Upstream Downstream
Upstream Downstream Diameter Material (a) Length Invert Elevation Invert Elevation Slope Design Capacity (b) Manhole Manhole Tributary Original Updated Original Updated Original Updated Original Updated Original Updated Original Updated Original Updated I.D. I.D. Area (inches) (inches) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet/feet) (feet/feet) (mgd) (mgd) (gal/day) (ft/s) (%) (ft) (ft) Sewer Replaced
(Diameter / Material
/ Inverts Updated)
Sewer Spot
Repaired (*Does Not
Affect Model)
New Development
Sewer Added for Sewer Added for
Completeness
Flow Velocity
Ratio of
Modeled Peak
Flow to Design
Criteria
Depth
(Normal)
Depth
(Critical) State of Flow
Hydraulic Modeling Results
Modeling Modifications Sewer Removed Realigned (Length Modified) Diameter Updated
Material Updated
Invert Elevation(s)
Updated
E4-24 E4-26 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 8 8 PVC PVC 289 289 72.53 72.53 66.37 66.37 0.021 0.021 0.741 0.741 39,155 1.52 5.3 0.07 0.11 Supercritical E4-26 E4-27 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 8 8 PVC PVC 349 349 66.37 66.37 55.81 55.81 0.030 0.030 0.884 0.884 43,420 1.56 4.9 0.07 0.12 Supercritical E4-27 E4-28 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 8 8 PVC PVC 201 201 55.81 55.81 50.54 50.54 0.026 0.026 0.822 0.822 47,685 1.61 5.8 0.08 0.12 Supercritical E4-28 E4-63 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 8 8 PVC PVC 261 261 50.54 50.54 41.05 41.05 0.036 0.036 0.968 0.968 51,951 1.26 5.4 0.08 0.13 Supercritical E4-30 E4-31 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 6 6 PVC PVC 75 75 261.94 261.94 260.54 260.54 0.019 0.019 0.322 0.322 2,455 0.67 0.8 0.02 0.03 Supercritical E4-31 E4-32 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 8 8 PVC PVC 61 61 260.54 260.54 259.03 259.03 0.025 0.025 0.799 0.799 4,910 0.74 0.6 0.03 0.04 Supercritical E4-32 E4-33 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 8 8 PVC PVC 100 100 259.03 259.03 248.30 248.30 0.107 0.107 1.663 1.663 9,819 1.02 0.6 0.03 0.06 Supercritical E4-33 E4-37 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 8 8 PVC PVC 103 103 248.30 248.30 236.29 236.29 0.117 0.117 1.733 1.733 12,274 0.87 0.7 0.03 0.06 Supercritical E4-34 E4-35 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 6 6 PVC PVC 114 114 242.35 242.35 238.07 238.07 0.038 0.038 0.457 0.457 12,274 1.14 2.7 0.04 0.07 Supercritical E4-35 E4-37 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 6 6 PVC PVC 67 67 238.07 238.07 236.29 236.29 0.027 0.027 0.384 0.384 14,729 1.04 3.8 0.05 0.07 Supercritical E4-36 E4-37 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 6 6 PVC PVC 102 102 239.71 239.71 236.29 236.29 0.034 0.034 0.432 0.432 2,455 0.47 0.6 0.02 0.03 Supercritical E4-37 E4-38 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 8 8 PVC PVC 140 140 236.29 236.29 228.37 228.37 0.057 0.057 1.207 1.207 31,913 1.45 2.6 0.05 0.1 Supercritical E4-38 E4-39 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 8 8 PVC PVC 213 213 228.37 228.37 223.11 223.11 0.025 0.025 0.798 0.798 34,368 1.49 4.3 0.07 0.1 Supercritical E4-39 E4-47 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 8 8 PVC PVC 163 163 223.11 223.11 205.80 205.80 0.106 0.106 1.654 1.654 36,822 1.34 2.2 0.05 0.11 Supercritical E4-40 E4-41 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 6 6 PVC PVC 174 174 216.95 216.95 212.66 212.66 0.025 0.025 0.371 0.371 2,455 0.64 0.7 0.02 0.03 Supercritical E4-41 E4-47 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 6 6 PVC PVC 127 127 212.66 212.66 205.80 205.80 0.054 0.054 0.548 0.548 4,910 0.56 0.9 0.02 0.04 Supercritical E4-42 E4-43 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 6 6 PVC PVC 83 83 214.41 214.41 212.24 212.24 0.026 0.026 0.381 0.381 2,455 0.64 0.6 0.02 0.03 Supercritical E4-43 E4-44 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 6 6 PVC PVC 109 109 212.24 212.24 210.22 210.22 0.019 0.019 0.321 0.321 4,910 0.83 1.5 0.03 0.04 Supercritical E4-44 E4-45 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 6 6 PVC PVC 67 67 210.22 210.22 209.09 209.09 0.017 0.017 0.306 0.306 7,364 0.96 2.4 0.04 0.05 Supercritical E4-45 E4-46 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 6 6 PVC PVC 47 47 209.09 209.09 208.12 208.12 0.021 0.021 0.339 0.339 9,819 1.06 2.9 0.04 0.06 Supercritical E4-46 E4-47 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 6 6 PVC PVC 146 146 208.12 208.12 205.80 205.80 0.016 0.016 0.297 0.297 12,274 0.83 4.1 0.05 0.07 Supercritical E4-47 E4-48 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 8 8 PVC PVC 116 116 205.80 205.80 197.54 197.54 0.071 0.071 1.355 1.355 56,461 1.71 4.2 0.07 0.13 Supercritical E4-48 E4-52 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 8 8 PVC PVC 117 117 197.54 197.54 188.23 188.23 0.080 0.080 1.432 1.432 58,916 1.66 4.1 0.07 0.14 Supercritical E4-49 E4-50 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 6 6 PVC PVC 87 87 191.26 191.26 190.19 190.19 0.012 0.012 0.261 0.261 2,455 0.64 0.9 0.02 0.03 Supercritical E4-50 E4-51 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 6 6 PVC PVC 63 63 190.19 190.19 189.51 189.51 0.011 0.011 0.245 0.245 4,910 0.83 2 0.04 0.04 Subcritical E4-51 E4-52 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 6 6 PVC PVC 64 64 189.51 189.51 188.23 188.23 0.020 0.020 0.333 0.333 7,364 0.65 2.2 0.04 0.05 Supercritical E4-52 E4-53 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 8 8 PVC PVC 32 32 188.23 188.23 181.95 181.95 0.196 0.196 2.249 2.249 68,735 1.81 3.1 0.06 0.15 Supercritical E4-53 E4-56 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 8 8 PVC PVC 45 45 181.95 181.95 171.57 171.57 0.231 0.231 2.438 2.438 71,190 1.74 2.9 0.06 0.15 Supercritical E4-54 E4-55 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 6 6 PVC PVC 52 52 173.23 173.23 172.63 172.63 0.012 0.012 0.253 0.253 2,455 0.67 1 0.03 0.03 Subcritical E4-55 E4-56 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 8 8 PVC PVC 145 145 172.63 172.63 171.57 171.57 0.007 0.007 0.434 0.434 4,910 0.52 1.1 0.04 0.04 Subcritical E4-56 E4-57 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 8 8 PVC PVC 94 94 171.57 171.57 171.27 171.27 0.003 0.003 0.287 0.287 77,037 1.82 26.9 0.17 0.16 Subcritical E4-57 E4-58 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 8 8 PVC PVC 154 154 171.27 171.27 170.53 170.53 0.005 0.005 0.352 0.352 77,974 1.88 22.2 0.15 0.16 Supercritical E4-58 E4-59 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 8 8 PVC PVC 142 142 170.53 170.53 166.17 166.17 0.031 0.031 0.890 0.890 80,429 1.89 9 0.1 0.16 Supercritical E4-59 E4-60 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 8 8 PVC PVC 179 179 166.17 166.17 151.18 151.18 0.084 0.084 1.469 1.469 82,884 1.91 5.6 0.08 0.16 Supercritical E4-60 E4-62 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 8 8 PVC PVC 236 236 151.18 151.18 43.23 43.23 0.457 0.457 3.433 3.433 85,338 1.93 2.5 0.05 0.17 Supercritical E4-62 E4-63 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 8 8 PVC PVC 108 108 43.23 43.23 41.05 41.05 0.020 0.020 0.721 0.721 86,276 1.65 12 0.11 0.17 Supercritical E4-63 E4-64 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 8 8 PVC PVC 211 211 41.05 41.05 39.67 39.67 0.007 0.007 0.411 0.411 142,492 2.23 34.7 0.19 0.22 Supercritical E4-64 E4-65 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 8 8 PVC PVC 142 142 39.67 39.67 39.05 39.05 0.004 0.004 0.335 0.335 146,757 2.25 43.8 0.21 0.22 Supercritical E4-65 E4-66 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 8 8 PVC PVC 174 174 39.05 39.05 38.14 38.14 0.005 0.005 0.367 0.367 151,022 2.26 41.1 0.21 0.22 Supercritical E4-66 E4-68 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 8 8 PVC PVC 322 322 38.14 38.14 35.35 35.35 0.009 0.009 0.473 0.473 155,288 2.7 32.8 0.18 0.23 Supercritical E4-67 E4-68 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 12 12 VCP VCP 60 60 36.54 36.54 34.77 34.77 0.029 0.029 3.666 3.666 4,265 0.43 0.1 0.02 0.03 Supercritical E4-68 E4-69 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 15 15 VCP VCP 310 310 34.77 34.77 26.41 26.41 0.027 0.027 6.356 6.356 447,209 2.72 8.3 0.22 0.33 Supercritical E4-69 E4-70 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 15 15 VCP VCP 309 309 26.41 26.41 16.94 16.94 0.031 0.031 6.775 6.775 451,475 2.73 7.9 0.21 0.33 Supercritical E4-70 F4-01 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 15 15 VCP VCP 310 310 16.94 16.94 7.54 7.54 0.030 0.030 6.739 6.739 455,740 3.93 8 0.21 0.33 Supercritical E4-71 E4-72 Guadalupe Canyon 8 8 PVC PVC 192 192 226.21 226.21 222.35 222.35 0.020 0.020 0.720 0.720 2,045 0.58 0.3 0.02 0.03 Supercritical E4-72 E3-11 Guadalupe Canyon 8 8 PVC PVC 113 113 222.35 222.35 215.82 215.82 0.058 0.058 1.220 1.220 4,090 0.76 0.3 0.02 0.04 Supercritical E4-73 E4-74 Guadalupe Canyon 6 6 PVC PVC 113 113 197.75 197.75 195.33 195.33 0.021 0.021 0.345 0.345 2,045 0.6 0.6 0.02 0.03 Supercritical E4-74 E4-75 Guadalupe Canyon 6 6 PVC PVC 135 135 195.33 195.33 190.73 190.73 0.034 0.034 0.435 0.435 4,090 0.79 0.9 0.02 0.04 Supercritical E4-75 E4-76 Guadalupe Canyon 6 6 PVC PVC 168 168 190.73 190.73 182.38 182.38 0.050 0.050 0.525 0.525 6,134 0.96 1.2 0.03 0.05 Supercritical E4-76 E4-77 Guadalupe Canyon 8 8 PVC PVC 82 82 182.38 182.38 171.45 171.45 0.133 0.133 1.853 1.853 8,179 0.96 0.4 0.02 0.05 Supercritical E4-77 E4-78 Guadalupe Canyon 8 8 PVC PVC 293 293 171.45 171.45 168.52 168.52 0.010 0.010 0.508 0.508 10,224 1.27 2 0.05 0.06 Supercritical E4-78 E4-85 Guadalupe Canyon 8 8 PVC PVC 163 163 168.52 168.52 166.42 166.42 0.013 0.013 0.576 0.576 10,224 0.88 1.8 0.04 0.06 Supercritical E4-79 E4-80 Guadalupe Canyon 6 6 PVC PVC 134 134 220.69 220.69 216.16 216.16 0.034 0.034 0.433 0.433 2,045 0.6 0.5 0.02 0.03 Supercritical E4-80 E4-81 Guadalupe Canyon 6 6 PVC PVC 135 135 216.16 216.16 213.85 213.85 0.017 0.017 0.308 0.308 4,090 0.79 1.3 0.03 0.04 Supercritical E4-81 E4-82 Guadalupe Canyon 6 6 PVC PVC 149 149 213.85 213.85 209.62 209.62 0.028 0.028 0.397 0.397 6,134 0.96 1.5 0.03 0.05 Supercritical E4-82 E4-83 Guadalupe Canyon 8 8 PVC PVC 92 92 209.62 209.62 197.36 197.36 0.133 0.133 1.853 1.853 8,179 0.96 0.4 0.02 0.05 Supercritical E4-83 E4-84 Guadalupe Canyon 8 8 PVC PVC 51 51 197.36 197.36 167.80 167.80 0.580 0.580 3.865 3.865 10,224 3.52 0.3 0.02 0.06 Supercritical E4-84 E4-85 Guadalupe Canyon 8 8 PVC PVC 19 19 167.80 167.80 166.42 166.42 0.073 0.073 1.368 1.368 10,224 0.88 0.7 0.03 0.06 Supercritical E4-85 E4-86 Guadalupe Canyon 8 8 PVC PVC 122 122 166.42 166.42 164.97 164.97 0.012 0.012 0.553 0.553 20,448 1.61 3.7 0.06 0.08 Supercritical E4-86 E4-87 Guadalupe Canyon 8 8 PVC PVC 143 143 164.97 164.97 162.46 162.46 0.018 0.018 0.673 0.673 20,448 1.75 3 0.06 0.08 Supercritical E4-87 E4-88 Guadalupe Canyon 8 8 PVC PVC 250 250 162.46 162.46 158.85 158.85 0.014 0.014 0.610 0.610 20,448 1.68 3.4 0.06 0.08 Supercritical E4-88 E4-90 Guadalupe Canyon 8 8 PVC PVC 111 111 158.85 158.85 157.01 157.01 0.017 0.017 0.654 0.654 20,448 1.73 3.1 0.06 0.08 Supercritical E4-89 E4-90 Guadalupe Canyon 8 8 PVC PVC 152 152 161.27 161.27 157.01 157.01 0.028 0.028 0.850 0.850 0 0 0 (N/A) 0 Subcritical E4-90 F4-13 Guadalupe Canyon 8 8 PVC PVC 127 127 157.01 157.01 115.53 115.53 0.327 0.327 2.901 2.901 20,448 3.68 0.7 0.03 0.08 Supercritical E4-91 E4-12 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 10 10 VCP VCP 156 156 43.49 43.49 41.12 41.12 0.015 0.015 1.031 1.031 51,184 1.09 5.9 0.1 0.12 Supercritical E4-93 E4-21 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 6 6 VCP VCP 32 32 140.95 140.95 134.24 134.24 0.210 0.210 0.981 0.981 2,455 0.64 0.3 0.01 0.03 Supercritical E4-94 E4-17 X Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 8 8 VCP VCP 241 241 162.03 162.03 151.91 151.91 0.042 0.042 0.946 0.946 9,819 0.97 1.2 0.04 0.06 Supercritical

Page 163 of 273 ends

EKI B50006.00 Page 4 of 7
Erler & Kalinowski, Inc.

March 2017
TABLE A-2
Summary of Gravity Sewer Attributes and Modifications
Sewer System Master Plan Update
City of Brisbane, California
CIPs Since 2003 Existing Sewer Attributes
Upstream Downstream
Upstream Downstream Diameter Material (a) Length Invert Elevation Invert Elevation Slope Design Capacity (b) Manhole Manhole Tributary Original Updated Original Updated Original Updated Original Updated Original Updated Original Updated Original Updated I.D. I.D. Area (inches) (inches) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet/feet) (feet/feet) (mgd) (mgd) (gal/day) (ft/s) (%) (ft) (ft) Sewer Replaced
(Diameter / Material
/ Inverts Updated)
Sewer Spot
Repaired (*Does Not
Affect Model)
New Development
Sewer Added for Sewer Added for
Completeness
Flow Velocity
Ratio of
Modeled Peak
Flow to Design
Criteria
Depth
(Normal)
Depth
(Critical) State of Flow
Hydraulic Modeling Results
Modeling Modifications Sewer Removed Realigned (Length Modified) Diameter Updated
Material Updated
Invert Elevation(s)
Updated
E4-95 E4-94 X Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 8 8 VCP VCP 33 33 164.61 164.61 162.03 162.03 0.078 0.078 1.290 1.290 7,364 0.92 0.7 0.03 0.05 Supercritical E4-96 E4-95 X Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 6 6 VCP VCP 92 92 164.74 164.74 164.61 164.61 0.001 0.001 0.081 0.081 4,910 0.65 7.2 0.06 0.04 Subcritical E4-97 E4-96 X Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 6 6 VCP VCP 29 29 177.51 177.51 164.74 164.74 0.440 0.440 1.422 1.422 2,455 0.53 0.2 0.01 0.03 Supercritical E5-01 E5-02 Central Brisbane 6 6 VCP VCP 207 207 302.01 302.01 231.86 231.86 0.339 0.339 1.247 1.247 4,729 0.76 0.4 0.02 0.04 Supercritical E5-02 E5-03 Central Brisbane 6 6 VCP VCP 162 162 231.86 231.86 229.36 229.36 0.015 0.015 0.266 0.266 9,457 0.85 4.2 0.05 0.06 Supercritical E5-03 F5-02 Central Brisbane 6 6 VCP VCP 290 290 229.36 229.36 154.35 154.35 0.259 0.259 1.090 1.090 23,643 1.16 2.6 0.04 0.09 Supercritical E5-04 E5-05 Central Brisbane 6 6 VCP VCP 301 301 231.48 231.48 206.35 206.35 0.083 0.083 0.619 0.619 4,729 0.76 0.9 0.02 0.04 Supercritical E5-05 E5-09 Central Brisbane 6 6 VCP VCP 230 230 206.35 206.35 199.70 199.70 0.029 0.029 0.364 0.364 9,457 0.99 3.1 0.04 0.06 Supercritical E5-09 E5-10 Central Brisbane 6 6 VCP VCP 74 74 199.70 199.70 194.85 194.85 0.066 0.066 0.549 0.549 14,186 1.14 3.1 0.04 0.07 Supercritical E5-10 E5-11 Central Brisbane 6 6 VCP VCP 43 43 194.85 194.85 193.19 193.19 0.039 0.039 0.421 0.421 18,914 1.26 5.3 0.06 0.08 Supercritical E5-11 E5-12 Central Brisbane 6 6 VCP VCP 185 185 193.19 193.19 173.95 173.95 0.104 0.104 0.691 0.691 23,643 1.35 4 0.05 0.09 Supercritical E5-12 F5-06 Central Brisbane 6 6 VCP VCP 127 127 173.95 173.95 156.88 156.88 0.134 0.134 0.786 0.786 28,372 1.43 4.3 0.05 0.1 Supercritical E5-13 E5-14 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 8 8 VCP VCP 296 296 92.31 92.31 76.53 76.53 0.053 0.053 1.066 1.066 29,857 1.4 3.3 0.06 0.1 Supercritical E5-14 E5-15 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 8 8 VCP VCP 303 303 76.53 76.53 60.38 60.38 0.053 0.053 1.065 1.065 34,123 1.46 3.8 0.06 0.1 Supercritical E5-15 E5-16 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 8 8 VCP VCP 301 301 60.38 60.38 46.70 46.70 0.045 0.045 0.984 0.984 38,388 2.31 4.6 0.07 0.11 Supercritical E5-16 E5-17 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 10 10 VCP VCP 235 235 46.70 46.70 44.71 44.71 0.009 0.009 0.772 0.772 42,653 1.41 6.5 0.1 0.11 Supercritical E5-17 E4-91 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 10 10 VCP VCP 277 277 44.71 44.71 43.49 43.49 0.004 0.004 0.555 0.555 46,919 1.44 10 0.13 0.12 Subcritical E6-01 E6-02 Central Brisbane 6 6 VCP VCP 197 197 360.98 360.98 353.51 353.51 0.038 0.038 0.417 0.417 4,729 0.76 1.3 0.03 0.04 Supercritical E6-02 E6-03 Central Brisbane 6 6 VCP VCP 103 103 353.51 353.51 349.61 349.61 0.038 0.038 0.417 0.417 9,457 0.99 2.7 0.04 0.06 Supercritical E6-03 E6-04 Central Brisbane 6 6 VCP VCP 141 141 349.61 349.61 339.84 339.84 0.069 0.069 0.564 0.564 14,186 1.14 3 0.04 0.07 Supercritical E6-04 E6-05 Central Brisbane 6 6 VCP VCP 149 149 339.84 339.84 309.72 309.72 0.202 0.202 0.963 0.963 18,914 1.26 2.3 0.04 0.08 Supercritical E6-05 E6-09 Central Brisbane 6 6 VCP VCP 176 176 309.72 309.72 275.65 275.55 0.194 0.194 0.943 0.944 23,643 1.35 3 0.04 0.09 Supercritical X E6-08 E6-09 Central Brisbane 6 8 VCP HDPE 63 63 276.48 276.48 275.65 275.65 0.013 0.013 0.246 0.486 4,729 1.01 1 0.03 0.04 Supercritical X E6-09 F6-15 Central Brisbane 6 8 VCP HDPE 167 167 275.65 275.55 271.08 274.20 0.027 0.008 0.354 0.380 33,100 1.44 8.7 0.09 0.1 Supercritical X F4-01 F4-02 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 18 18 VCP VCP 230 230 7.54 7.54 6.38 6.38 0.005 0.005 4.469 4.469 460,005 2.49 12.2 0.31 0.31 Subcritical F4-02 F4-03 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 18 18 VCP VCP 230 230 6.38 6.38 5.58 5.58 0.003 0.003 3.712 3.712 464,271 2.49 14.8 0.34 0.31 Subcritical F4-03 F4-04 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 18 18 VCP VCP 150 150 5.58 5.58 4.82 4.82 0.005 0.005 4.480 4.480 468,536 2.66 12.4 0.32 0.32 Subcritical F4-04 F4-05 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 18 18 VCP VCP 148 148 4.82 4.82 4.08 4.08 0.005 0.005 4.450 4.450 472,801 2.64 12.6 0.32 0.32 Subcritical F4-05 F5-55 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 18 18 VCP VCP 341 341 4.08 4.08 2.48 2.48 0.005 0.005 4.311 4.311 477,067 2.6 13.1 0.32 0.32 Subcritical F4-06 F4-07 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 6 6 VCP VCP 191 191 87.73 87.73 12.93 12.93 0.392 0.392 1.341 1.341 4,265 0.49 0.4 0.02 0.04 Supercritical F4-07 F4-08 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 8 8 VCP VCP 297 297 12.93 12.93 9.96 9.96 0.010 0.010 0.461 0.461 364,265 3 93.3 0.32 0.35 Supercritical F4-08 F4-09 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 8 8 VCP VCP 239 239 9.96 9.96 7.60 7.60 0.010 0.010 0.459 0.459 368,531 3.21 95 0.32 0.35 Supercritical F4-09 F4-10 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 12 12 VCP VCP 332 332 7.60 7.60 5.97 5.97 0.005 0.005 1.496 1.496 372,796 2.57 29.5 0.33 0.32 Subcritical F4-10 F4-11 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 12 12 VCP VCP 245 245 5.97 5.97 4.77 4.77 0.005 0.005 1.494 1.494 377,061 2.59 29.8 0.33 0.32 Subcritical F4-11 F4-12 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 12 12 VCP VCP 199 199 4.77 4.77 3.77 3.77 0.005 0.005 1.513 1.513 381,327 2.62 29.8 0.33 0.32 Subcritical F4-12 F5-53 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 12 12 VCP VCP 311 311 3.77 3.77 2.20 2.20 0.005 0.005 1.517 1.517 385,592 2.39 30 0.33 0.32 Subcritical F4-13 F4-14 Guadalupe Canyon 8 8 PVC PVC 73 73 115.53 115.53 91.69 91.69 0.327 0.327 2.901 2.901 20,448 1.16 0.7 0.03 0.08 Supercritical F4-14 F4-15 Guadalupe Canyon 8 8 PVC PVC 214 214 91.69 91.69 85.27 85.27 0.030 0.030 0.879 0.879 30,672 2.22 3.5 0.06 0.1 Supercritical F4-15 F4-16 Guadalupe Canyon 8 8 PVC PVC 194 194 85.27 85.27 79.45 79.45 0.030 0.030 0.879 0.879 30,672 2.22 3.5 0.06 0.1 Supercritical F4-16 F4-17 Guadalupe Canyon 8 8 PVC PVC 269 269 79.45 79.45 72.04 72.04 0.028 0.028 0.843 0.843 30,672 0.91 3.6 0.06 0.1 Supercritical F4-17 O-1 All (Flow to SFPUC Interceptor) 16 16 AC AC 6350 6350 71.38 71.38 -11.12 -11.12 0.013 0.013 5.240 5.240 3,623,969 6.43 69.2 0.7 0.94 Supercritical F5-01 F5-02 Central Brisbane 6 6 VCP VCP 286 286 155.49 155.49 154.35 154.35 0.004 0.004 0.135 0.135 4,729 0.45 4.1 0.05 0.04 Subcritical F5-02 F5-03 Central Brisbane 6 6 VCP VCP 185 185 154.35 154.35 134.93 134.93 0.105 0.105 0.694 0.694 47,286 1.69 8 0.07 0.13 Supercritical F5-03 F6-34 Central Brisbane 6 6 VCP VCP 150 150 134.93 134.93 116.31 116.31 0.124 0.124 0.755 0.755 52,015 1.74 8.1 0.07 0.14 Supercritical F5-04 F5-05 Central Brisbane 6 6 VCP VCP 478 478 93.31 93.31 59.18 59.18 0.071 0.071 0.573 0.573 4,729 0.51 1 0.03 0.04 Supercritical F5-05 F5-15 Central Brisbane 8 8 VCP VCP 250 250 59.18 59.18 40.11 40.11 0.076 0.076 1.275 1.275 257,229 2.47 23.9 0.16 0.29 Supercritical F5-06 F5-07 Central Brisbane 6 6 VCP VCP 232 232 156.88 156.88 133.70 133.70 0.100 0.100 0.677 0.677 33,100 1.51 5.8 0.06 0.11 Supercritical F5-07 F5-10 Central Brisbane 6 6 VCP VCP 128 128 133.70 133.70 128.93 128.93 0.037 0.037 0.414 0.414 37,829 1.48 10.8 0.08 0.12 Supercritical F5-08 F5-09 Central Brisbane 6 6 VCP VCP 193 193 152.63 152.63 136.12 136.12 0.086 0.086 0.627 0.627 4,729 0.76 0.9 0.02 0.04 Supercritical F5-09 F5-10 Central Brisbane 6 6 VCP VCP 199 199 136.12 136.12 128.93 128.93 0.036 0.036 0.407 0.407 9,457 0.73 2.7 0.04 0.06 Supercritical F5-10 F5-11 Central Brisbane 6 6 VCP VCP 72 72 128.93 128.93 119.08 119.08 0.137 0.137 0.793 0.793 52,015 1.74 7.8 0.07 0.14 Supercritical F5-11 F5-12 Central Brisbane 6 6 VCP VCP 155 155 119.08 119.08 101.09 101.09 0.116 0.116 0.730 0.730 56,743 1.79 9.2 0.07 0.15 Supercritical F5-12 F5-13 Central Brisbane 6 6 VCP VCP 194 194 101.09 101.09 84.05 84.05 0.088 0.088 0.635 0.635 61,472 3.24 11.4 0.08 0.15 Supercritical F5-13 F5-14 Central Brisbane 8 8 VCP VCP 296 296 84.05 84.05 44.53 44.53 0.134 0.134 1.686 1.686 66,200 1.75 4.6 0.07 0.15 Supercritical F5-14 F5-15 Central Brisbane 8 8 VCP VCP 241 241 44.53 44.53 40.11 40.11 0.018 0.018 0.625 0.625 73,469 1.25 13.9 0.12 0.15 Supercritical F5-15 F5-18 Central Brisbane 8 8 VCP VCP 250 250 40.11 40.11 23.30 23.30 0.067 0.067 1.197 1.197 334,005 2.87 33 0.18 0.34 Supercritical F5-16 F5-17 Central Brisbane 6 6 VCP VCP 339 339 71.95 71.95 26.82 26.82 0.133 0.133 0.782 0.782 7,269 0.85 1.1 0.03 0.05 Supercritical F5-17 F5-18 Central Brisbane 6 6 VCP VCP 255 255 26.82 26.82 23.30 23.30 0.014 0.014 0.252 0.252 14,537 0.71 6.8 0.06 0.07 Supercritical F5-18 F5-22 Central Brisbane 8 8 VCP VCP 416 416 23.30 23.30 4.74 4.74 0.045 0.045 0.975 0.975 351,849 4.39 42.7 0.21 0.35 Supercritical F5-19 F5-20 Central Brisbane 6 6 VCP VCP 240 240 70.32 70.32 17.25 17.25 0.221 0.221 1.008 1.008 26,183 1.36 3.1 0.04 0.1 Supercritical F5-20 F5-21 Central Brisbane 6 6 VCP VCP 150 150 17.25 17.25 8.21 8.21 0.060 0.060 0.526 0.526 33,452 1.48 7.5 0.07 0.11 Supercritical F5-21 F5-22 Central Brisbane 6 6 VCP VCP 280 280 8.21 8.21 4.74 4.74 0.012 0.012 0.239 0.239 40,720 1.07 20.1 0.11 0.12 Supercritical F5-22 F5-37 Central Brisbane 12 12 VCP VCP 28 28 4.74 4.74 4.33 4.33 0.015 0.015 2.583 2.583 395,876 1.99 18.1 0.25 0.33 Supercritical F5-23 F5-25 Central Brisbane 6 6 VCP VCP 148 148 107.72 107.72 107.01 107.01 0.005 0.005 0.148 0.148 8,094 0.72 6.4 0.06 0.05 Subcritical F5-25 F5-26 Central Brisbane 6 6 VCP VCP 100 100 107.01 107.01 106.59 106.59 0.004 0.004 0.139 0.139 16,188 1.02 13.8 0.09 0.08 Subcritical F5-26 F5-28 Central Brisbane 6 6 VCP VCP 202 202 106.59 106.59 98.30 98.30 0.041 0.041 0.434 0.434 24,282 1.17 6.6 0.06 0.09 Supercritical X F5-27 F5-28 Central Brisbane 8 8 VCP VCP 303 303 173.85 173.85 98.30 98.30 0.249 0.249 2.304 2.304 16,188 0.87 0.8 0.03 0.07 Supercritical

Page 164 of 273 ends

EKI B50006.00 Page 5 of 7
Erler & Kalinowski, Inc.

March 2017
TABLE A-2
Summary of Gravity Sewer Attributes and Modifications
Sewer System Master Plan Update
City of Brisbane, California
CIPs Since 2003 Existing Sewer Attributes
Upstream Downstream
Upstream Downstream Diameter Material (a) Length Invert Elevation Invert Elevation Slope Design Capacity (b) Manhole Manhole Tributary Original Updated Original Updated Original Updated Original Updated Original Updated Original Updated Original Updated I.D. I.D. Area (inches) (inches) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet/feet) (feet/feet) (mgd) (mgd) (gal/day) (ft/s) (%) (ft) (ft) Sewer Replaced
(Diameter / Material
/ Inverts Updated)
Sewer Spot
Repaired (*Does Not
Affect Model)
New Development
Sewer Added for Sewer Added for
Completeness
Flow Velocity
Ratio of
Modeled Peak
Flow to Design
Criteria
Depth
(Normal)
Depth
(Critical) State of Flow
Hydraulic Modeling Results
Modeling Modifications Sewer Removed Realigned (Length Modified) Diameter Updated
Material Updated
Invert Elevation(s)
Updated
F5-28 F5-29 Central Brisbane 6 6 VCP VCP 137 137 98.30 98.30 55.61 55.61 0.312 0.312 1.196 1.196 48,564 1.6 4.8 0.05 0.13 Supercritical F5-29 F5-30 Central Brisbane 6 6 VCP VCP 166 166 55.61 55.61 44.02 44.02 0.070 0.070 0.566 0.566 64,752 1.83 13.5 0.09 0.16 Supercritical F5-30 F5-31 Central Brisbane 6 6 VCP VCP 299 299 44.02 44.02 38.25 38.25 0.019 0.019 0.298 0.298 72,846 1.45 28.9 0.13 0.17 Supercritical F5-31 F5-34 Central Brisbane 8 8 VCP VCP 249 249 38.25 38.25 21.84 21.84 0.066 0.066 1.185 1.185 263,747 2.57 26.3 0.16 0.3 Supercritical F5-32 F6-79 Central Brisbane 6 6 VCP VCP 314 314 43.32 43.32 40.00 40.00 0.011 0.011 0.220 0.220 4,729 0.6 2.5 0.04 0.04 Subcritical F5-33 F5-34 Central Brisbane 6 6 VCP VCP 337 337 29.67 29.67 21.84 21.84 0.023 0.023 0.327 0.327 38,984 1.05 14.1 0.09 0.12 Supercritical F5-34 F5-36 Central Brisbane 8 8 VCP VCP 251 251 21.84 21.84 10.33 10.33 0.046 0.046 0.988 0.988 306,858 4.24 36.7 0.19 0.32 Supercritical F5-35 F5-36 Central Brisbane 6 6 VCP VCP 218 218 18.92 18.92 10.33 10.33 0.039 0.039 0.425 0.425 10,613 0.65 2.9 0.04 0.06 Supercritical F5-36 F5-37 Central Brisbane 10 10 VCP VCP 414 414 10.33 10.33 4.33 4.33 0.014 0.014 1.007 1.007 321,598 1.94 37.7 0.25 0.31 Supercritical F5-37 F5-45 Central Brisbane 12 12 VCP VCP 102 102 4.33 4.33 3.74 4.14 0.006 0.002 1.623 0.921 720,781 2.61 92.5 0.63 0.44 Subcritical X F5-38 F5-40 Central Brisbane 6 8 VCP HDPE 241 241 38.04 46.60 21.17 21.17 0.070 0.106 0.567 1.374 2,024 0.46 0.1 0.01 0.03 Supercritical X F5-39 F5-40 Central Brisbane 6 8 VCP HDPE 273 273 32.89 32.89 21.17 21.17 0.043 0.043 0.444 0.876 8,094 0.91 0.9 0.03 0.05 Supercritical X F5-40 F5-41 Central Brisbane 6 8 VCP HDPE 178 178 21.17 21.17 8.15 8.25 0.073 0.073 0.580 1.140 12,141 1.91 1.1 0.04 0.06 Supercritical X F5-41 F5-43 Central Brisbane 6 8 VCP HDPE 260 260 8.15 8.15 5.27 5.37 0.011 0.011 0.226 0.437 16,268 1.38 3.7 0.06 0.07 Supercritical X F5-42 F5-43 Central Brisbane 6 8 VCP HDPE 245 245 13.99 13.99 5.27 5.37 0.036 0.035 0.405 0.795 4,127 1.18 0.5 0.03 0.04 Supercritical X F5-43 F5-44 Central Brisbane 6 8 VCP HDPE 243 243 5.27 5.27 4.76 4.86 0.002 0.002 0.098 0.174 24,522 1.14 14.1 0.12 0.09 Subcritical X F5-44 F5-45 Central Brisbane 8 8 VCP HDPE 96 96 4.76 4.76 3.74 4.14 0.011 0.006 0.476 0.371 27,828 0.78 8.9 0.1 0.09 Subcritical X F5-45 F5-51 Central Brisbane 15 15 VCP VCP 338 338 3.74 4.14 3.00 3.00 0.002 0.003 1.811 2.248 755,500 2.77 39.7 0.48 0.43 Subcritical X F5-46 F5-47 Bayshore 12 12 VCP VCP 284 284 9.90 9.90 8.23 8.23 0.006 0.006 1.637 1.637 103,401 1.88 7.5 0.16 0.16 Subcritical F5-47 F5-48 Bayshore 12 12 VCP VCP 396 396 8.23 8.23 5.90 5.90 0.006 0.006 1.637 1.637 107,224 1.77 7.7 0.17 0.17 Subcritical F5-48 F5-49 Bayshore 12 12 VCP VCP 315 315 5.90 5.90 4.66 4.66 0.004 0.004 1.339 1.339 111,048 1.62 9.8 0.19 0.17 Subcritical F5-49 F5-50 Bayshore 12 12 VCP VCP 384 384 4.66 4.66 3.16 3.16 0.004 0.004 1.334 1.334 123,524 1.31 10.9 0.2 0.18 Subcritical F5-50 F5-51 Bayshore 12 12 VCP VCP 76 76 3.16 3.16 3.00 3.00 0.002 0.002 0.979 0.979 126,165 0.73 15.2 0.23 0.18 Subcritical F5-51 F5-52 Bayshore 15 15 VCP VCP 275 275 3.00 3.00 -2.85 -2.85 0.021 0.021 5.645 5.645 882,070 3.31 18.5 0.32 0.46 Supercritical F5-52 WW-Valley Drive Bayshore 15 15 VCP VCP 85 85 -2.85 -2.85 -4.00 -4.00 0.014 0.014 4.502 4.502 884,711 3.99 23.2 0.36 0.46 Supercritical F5-53 F5-54 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 12 12 VCP VCP 313 313 2.20 2.20 1.28 1.28 0.003 0.003 1.157 1.157 389,857 2.45 39.8 0.38 0.32 Subcritical F5-54 F5-63 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 12 12 VCP VCP 319 319 1.28 1.28 -3.25 -3.25 0.014 0.014 2.544 2.544 394,123 2.39 18.3 0.26 0.32 Supercritical F5-55 F5-62 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 18 18 VCP VCP 337 337 2.48 2.48 0.96 0.96 0.005 0.005 4.227 4.227 481,332 2.59 13.5 0.33 0.32 Subcritical F5-57 F5-58 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 10 10 VCP VCP 225 225 8.56 8.56 7.22 7.22 0.006 0.006 0.646 0.646 4,265 0.57 0.8 0.04 0.03 Subcritical F5-58 F5-59 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 10 10 VCP VCP 222 222 7.22 7.22 6.39 6.39 0.004 0.004 0.512 0.512 8,531 0.69 2 0.06 0.05 Subcritical F5-59 F5-60 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 10 10 VCP VCP 225 225 6.39 6.39 5.54 5.54 0.004 0.004 0.514 0.514 12,796 0.91 2.9 0.07 0.06 Subcritical F5-60 F5-61 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 10 10 VCP VCP 216 216 5.54 5.54 3.48 3.48 0.010 0.010 0.817 0.817 17,061 1.13 2.5 0.07 0.07 Subcritical F5-61 F5-62 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 10 10 VCP VCP 265 265 3.48 3.48 0.96 0.96 0.010 0.010 0.816 0.816 21,327 0.73 3.1 0.07 0.08 Supercritical F5-62 F5-63 Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 18 18 VCP VCP 262 262 0.96 0.96 -3.25 -3.25 0.016 0.016 7.993 7.993 506,924 2.37 7.5 0.25 0.33 Supercritical F5-63 WW-Valley Drive Crocker Park / Northeast Ridge 24 24 VCP VCP 99 99 -3.25 -3.25 -4.00 -4.00 0.008 0.008 11.857 11.857 905,312 3.34 9 0.36 0.41 Supercritical F5-65 F5-19 Central Brisbane 6 6 VCP VCP 69 69 71.03 71.03 70.32 70.32 0.010 0.010 0.217 0.217 18,914 1.22 10.3 0.08 0.08 Subcritical F5-66 F5-65 Central Brisbane 6 6 PVC PVC 133 133 71.10 71.10 71.03 71.03 0.001 0.001 0.054 0.054 14,186 0.81 26.2 0.12 0.07 Subcritical F5-67 F5-66 Central Brisbane 6 6 PVC PVC 263 263 71.69 71.69 71.10 71.10 0.002 0.002 0.112 0.112 9,457 0.63 8.5 0.07 0.06 Subcritical F5-68 F5-67 Central Brisbane 6 6 PVC PVC 284 284 72.72 72.72 71.69 71.69 0.004 0.004 0.142 0.142 4,729 0.64 3.3 0.04 0.04 Subcritical F6-01 F6-02 Central Brisbane 6 6 VCP VCP 286 286 304.01 304.01 287.16 287.16 0.059 0.059 0.520 0.520 4,729 0.76 1.1 0.03 0.04 Supercritical F6-02 F6-03 Central Brisbane 6 6 VCP VCP 148 148 287.16 287.16 267.93 267.93 0.130 0.130 0.772 0.772 9,457 0.99 1.4 0.03 0.06 Supercritical F6-03 F6-04 Central Brisbane 6 6 VCP VCP 124 124 267.93 267.93 256.41 248.80 0.093 0.154 0.653 0.842 18,914 1.26 2 0.04 0.08 Supercritical X X F6-04 F6-05 Central Brisbane 6 6 VCP VCP 135 135 256.41 248.80 243.86 243.86 0.093 0.037 0.653 0.410 23,643 1.35 2.7 0.06 0.09 Supercritical X X F6-05 F6-06 Central Brisbane 6 6 VCP VCP 138 138 243.86 243.86 241.44 241.64 0.018 0.016 0.284 0.272 28,372 1.76 6.8 0.08 0.1 Supercritical X X F6-06 F6-07 Central Brisbane 6 8 VCP HDPE 326 326 241.44 241.44 232.20 232.30 0.028 0.028 0.361 0.708 33,100 2.05 12.3 0.07 0.1 Supercritical X F6-07 F6-14 Central Brisbane 6 8 VCP HDPE 124 124 232.20 232.20 226.16 226.46 0.049 0.046 0.473 0.910 37,829 2.4 4.7 0.07 0.11 Supercritical X F6-08 F6-09 Central Brisbane 6 6 PVC PVC 174 174 324.97 324.97 317.22 317.22 0.045 0.045 0.497 0.497 4,729 0.76 4.2 0.02 0.04 Supercritical F6-09 F6-10 Central Brisbane 6 6 VCP VCP 193 193 317.22 317.22 304.64 304.64 0.065 0.065 0.547 0.547 9,457 0.99 1 0.04 0.06 Supercritical F6-10 F6-12 Central Brisbane 6 6 VCP VCP 146 146 304.64 304.64 301.94 301.94 0.018 0.018 0.291 0.291 14,186 0.94 2 0.06 0.07 Supercritical F6-11 F6-12 Central Brisbane 6 6 VCP VCP 163 117 314.19 313.42 301.94 301.94 0.075 0.098 0.587 0.671 18,914 1.09 5.8 0.04 0.08 Supercritical X X F6-12 F6-13 Central Brisbane 6 6 VCP VCP 147 147 301.94 301.94 268.59 268.59 0.227 0.227 1.021 1.021 37,829 1.58 3.3 0.05 0.12 Supercritical F6-13 F6-14 Central Brisbane 6 6 VCP VCP 187 187 268.59 268.59 226.16 226.16 0.227 0.227 1.021 1.021 42,557 1.43 4.4 0.05 0.13 Supercritical F6-14 F6-17 Central Brisbane 6 8 VCP HDPE 63 63 226.16 226.16 224.07 224.07 0.033 0.033 0.390 0.770 85,115 1.6 4.9 0.11 0.17 Supercritical X F6-15 F6-16 Central Brisbane 6 8 VCP HDPE 203 203 271.08 274.20 264.44 264.44 0.033 0.048 0.388 0.928 37,829 1.5 11 0.07 0.11 Supercritical X F6-16 F6-17 Central Brisbane 6 8 VCP HDPE 316 316 264.44 264.44 224.07 224.07 0.128 0.128 0.766 1.512 42,557 1.12 4.1 0.06 0.12 Supercritical X F6-17 F6-18 Central Brisbane 6 6 VCP VCP 147 147 224.07 224.07 208.31 208.31 0.107 0.107 0.702 0.702 132,401 2.34 2.8 0.11 0.23 Supercritical F6-18 F6-19 Central Brisbane 6 6 VCP VCP 172 172 208.31 208.31 204.45 204.45 0.022 0.022 0.321 0.321 137,129 2.36 22.3 0.17 0.23 Supercritical F6-19 F6-20 Central Brisbane 6 6 VCP VCP 82 82 204.45 204.45 199.32 199.32 0.063 0.063 0.536 0.536 141,858 2.39 50.5 0.13 0.24 Supercritical F6-20 F6-21 Central Brisbane 6 6 VCP VCP 143 143 199.32 199.32 178.83 178.83 0.143 0.143 0.811 0.811 146,587 2.42 31.3 0.11 0.24 Supercritical F6-21 F6-23 Central Brisbane 6 6 VCP VCP 280 280 178.83 178.83 158.09 158.09 0.074 0.074 0.583 0.583 151,315 2.42 21.4 0.13 0.24 Supercritical F6-22 F6-23 Central Brisbane 6 6 VCP VCP 296 296 161.39 161.39 158.09 158.09 0.011 0.011 0.226 0.226 4,729 0.51 30.7 0.04 0.04 Subcritical F6-23 F6-24 Central Brisbane 6 6 VCP VCP 156 156 158.09 158.09 141.65 141.65 0.105 0.105 0.696 0.696 160,772 2.49 2.5 0.12 0.25 Supercritical F6-24 F6-25 Central Brisbane 6 6 VCP VCP 224 224 141.65 141.65 128.88 128.88 0.057 0.057 0.512 0.512 165,501 2.52 27.3 0.15 0.25 Supercritical F6-25 F6-29 Central Brisbane 6 6 VCP VCP 94 94 128.88 128.88 114.08 114.08 0.157 0.157 0.850 0.850 170,230 5.1 38.2 0.12 0.26 Supercritical F6-26 F6-27 Central Brisbane 6 6 VCP VCP 148 148 150.74 150.74 129.38 129.38 0.144 0.144 0.814 0.814 4,729 0.76 23.7 0.02 0.04 Supercritical F6-27 F6-28 Central Brisbane 6 6 VCP VCP 307 307 129.38 129.38 123.47 123.47 0.019 0.019 0.297 0.297 9,457 0.99 0.7 0.05 0.06 Supercritical F6-28 F6-29 Central Brisbane 6 6 VCP VCP 235 235 123.47 123.47 114.08 114.08 0.040 0.040 0.428 0.428 14,186 0.74 3.8 0.05 0.07 Supercritical

Page 165 of 273 ends

EKI B50006.00 Page 6 of 7
Erler & Kalinowski, Inc.

March 2017
TABLE A-2
Summary of Gravity Sewer Attributes and Modifications
Sewer System Master Plan Update
City of Brisbane, California
CIPs Since 2003 Existing Sewer Attributes
Upstream Downstream
Upstream Downstream Diameter Material (a) Length Invert Elevation Invert Elevation Slope Design Capacity (b) Manhole Manhole Tributary Original Updated Original Updated Original Updated Original Updated Original Updated Original Updated Original Updated I.D. I.D. Area (inches) (inches) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet/feet) (feet/feet) (mgd) (mgd) (gal/day) (ft/s) (%) (ft) (ft) Sewer Replaced
(Diameter / Material
/ Inverts Updated)
Sewer Spot
Repaired (*Does Not
Affect Model)
New Development
Sewer Added for Sewer Added for
Completeness
Flow Velocity
Ratio of
Modeled Peak
Flow to Design
Criteria
Depth
(Normal)
Depth
(Critical) State of Flow
Hydraulic Modeling Results
Modeling Modifications Sewer Removed Realigned (Length Modified) Diameter Updated
Material Updated
Invert Elevation(s)
Updated
F6-29 F6-35 Central Brisbane 8 8 HDPE HDPE 428 428 114.08 114.08 84.97 84.97 0.068 0.068 1.103 1.103 189,144 2.23 3.9 0.13 0.25 Supercritical X (c) F6-30 F6-31 Central Brisbane 6 6 VCP VCP 66 66 256.16 256.16 249.56 249.56 0.100 0.100 0.678 0.678 4,729 0.76 17.1 0.02 0.04 Supercritical F6-31 E5-03 Central Brisbane 6 6 VCP VCP 202 202 249.56 249.56 229.36 229.36 0.100 0.100 0.678 0.678 9,457 0.85 0.8 0.03 0.06 Supercritical F6-32 F5-02 Central Brisbane 6 6 VCP VCP 235 235 178.92 178.92 154.35 154.35 0.105 0.105 0.693 0.693 14,186 0.89 1.6 0.04 0.07 Supercritical F6-34 F6-35 Central Brisbane 6 6 VCP VCP 343 343 116.31 116.31 84.97 84.97 0.091 0.091 0.648 0.648 56,743 1.29 2.4 0.08 0.15 Supercritical F6-35 F5-05 Central Brisbane 8 8 VCP VCP 247 247 84.97 84.97 59.18 59.18 0.104 0.104 1.491 1.491 249,194 2.63 10.4 0.14 0.29 Supercritical F6-36 F6-37 Central Brisbane 6 6 VCP VCP 143 143 294.94 294.94 259.21 259.21 0.250 0.250 1.071 1.071 4,729 0.76 19.7 0.02 0.04 Supercritical F6-37 F6-41 Central Brisbane 6 6 VCP VCP 162 162 259.21 259.21 223.75 223.25 0.219 0.222 1.003 1.010 9,457 0.82 0.5 0.03 0.06 Supercritical X F6-38 F6-39 Central Brisbane 6 6 VCP VCP 102 102 266.90 266.90 252.97 252.97 0.137 0.137 0.792 0.792 9,457 0.99 1.1 0.03 0.06 Supercritical F6-39 F6-40 Central Brisbane 6 6 VCP VCP 152 152 252.97 252.97 242.93 242.93 0.066 0.066 0.551 0.551 14,186 1.2 1.4 0.04 0.07 Supercritical F6-40 F6-41 Central Brisbane 6 8 VCP PVC 258 258 242.93 242.93 223.75 223.75 0.074 0.074 0.584 1.384 18,914 2.39 3 0.04 0.08 Supercritical X F6-41 F6-43 Central Brisbane 6 8 VCP PVC 297 297 223.75 223.25 184.47 184.47 0.132 0.131 0.779 1.834 33,100 1.38 1.4 0.05 0.1 Supercritical X F6-42 F6-43 Central Brisbane 6 6 VCP VCP 92 92 190.29 190.29 184.47 184.47 0.063 0.063 0.539 0.539 4,729 0.58 1.8 0.03 0.04 Supercritical F6-43 F6-55 Central Brisbane 6 8 VCP PVC 233 233 184.47 184.47 153.15 153.25 0.134 0.134 0.786 1.858 42,557 3.54 1 0.05 0.12 Supercritical X F6-44 F6-45 Central Brisbane 6 6 VCP VCP 226 226 209.15 209.15 205.85 205.85 0.015 0.015 0.259 0.259 4,729 0.76 2.3 0.04 0.04 Subcritical F6-45 F6-46 Central Brisbane 6 6 VCP VCP 136 136 205.85 205.85 200.41 200.41 0.040 0.040 0.429 0.429 9,457 0.99 2.2 0.04 0.06 Supercritical F6-46 F6-47 Central Brisbane 6 6 VCP VCP 280 280 200.41 200.41 190.40 190.40 0.036 0.036 0.405 0.405 14,186 1.14 2.6 0.05 0.07 Supercritical F6-47 F6-51 Central Brisbane 6 6 VCP VCP 216 216 190.40 190.40 181.29 181.29 0.042 0.042 0.440 0.440 18,914 1.09 4.1 0.05 0.08 Supercritical F6-48 F6-49 Central Brisbane 6 6 VCP VCP 174 174 210.06 210.06 207.99 207.99 0.012 0.012 0.234 0.234 4,729 0.76 5.1 0.04 0.04 Subcritical F6-49 F6-50 Central Brisbane 6 6 VCP VCP 203 203 207.99 207.99 206.05 206.05 0.010 0.010 0.209 0.209 9,457 0.99 2.4 0.06 0.06 Subcritical F6-50 F6-51 Central Brisbane 6 6 VCP VCP 278 278 206.05 206.05 181.29 181.29 0.089 0.089 0.640 0.640 14,186 0.94 5.3 0.04 0.07 Supercritical F6-51 F6-52 Central Brisbane 6 6 VCP VCP 210 210 181.29 181.29 167.00 167.00 0.068 0.068 0.559 0.559 37,829 1.58 2.6 0.07 0.12 Supercritical F6-52 F6-53 Central Brisbane 6 6 VCP VCP 150 150 167.00 167.00 156.76 156.76 0.068 0.068 0.560 0.560 42,557 1.61 8 0.07 0.13 Supercritical F6-53 F6-54 Central Brisbane 6 6 VCP VCP 219 219 156.76 156.76 155.34 155.34 0.006 0.006 0.173 0.173 47,286 1.57 9 0.14 0.13 Subcritical F6-54 F6-55 Central Brisbane 6 6 VCP VCP 420 420 155.34 155.34 153.15 153.15 0.005 0.005 0.155 0.155 52,015 1.44 32.4 0.15 0.14 Subcritical F6-55 F6-62 Central Brisbane 6 8 VCP PVC 322 322 153.15 153.15 124.48 124.68 0.089 0.088 0.639 1.509 99,301 4.1 39.7 0.08 0.18 Supercritical X F6-56 F6-57 Central Brisbane 6 6 VCP VCP 355 355 177.68 177.68 169.68 169.68 0.023 0.023 0.322 0.322 4,729 0.76 6.6 0.03 0.04 Supercritical X F6-57 F6-58 Central Brisbane 6 6 VCP PVC 106 106 169.68 169.68 168.54 168.54 0.011 0.011 0.222 0.244 9,457 1.04 1.7 0.05 0.06 Supercritical X X F6-58 F6-61 Central Brisbane 6 8 VCP HDPE 117 117 168.54 168.54 147.64 147.64 0.179 0.179 0.906 1.788 14,186 0.94 3.9 0.03 0.07 Supercritical X F6-59 F6-60 Central Brisbane 6 6 VCP VCP 272 272 192.29 192.29 163.86 163.86 0.105 0.105 0.693 0.693 8,094 0.95 0.8 0.03 0.05 Supercritical F6-60 F6-61 Central Brisbane 6 6 VCP VCP 247 247 163.86 163.86 147.64 147.64 0.066 0.066 0.549 0.549 12,221 0.95 1.4 0.04 0.07 Supercritical F6-61 F6-62 Central Brisbane 6 8 VCP HDPE 168 168 147.64 147.64 124.48 124.68 0.138 0.137 0.796 1.564 31,135 2.95 2.6 0.05 0.1 Supercritical X F6-62 F6-87 Central Brisbane 6 8 VCP HDPE 187 187 124.48 124.48 110.12 110.22 0.077 0.076 0.594 1.168 135,164 3.93 2 0.11 0.21 Supercritical X F6-64 F6-65 Central Brisbane 6 6 PVC PVC 172 172 115.13 115.13 109.97 109.97 0.030 0.030 0.408 0.408 4,729 0.76 11.6 0.03 0.04 Supercritical F6-65 F6-68 Central Brisbane 6 6 VCP VCP 245 245 109.97 109.97 102.62 102.62 0.030 0.030 0.371 0.371 9,457 0.65 1.2 0.04 0.06 Supercritical F6-66 F6-67 Central Brisbane 6 8 VCP HDPE 158 158 118.03 118.03 109.98 110.08 0.051 0.050 0.484 0.949 8,094 1.55 3 0.03 0.05 Supercritical X F6-67 F6-68 Central Brisbane 6 8 VCP HDPE 218 218 109.98 109.98 102.62 103.12 0.034 0.031 0.394 0.750 16,188 1.71 0.9 0.05 0.07 Supercritical X F6-68 F6-71 Central Brisbane 6 8 VCP HDPE 245 245 102.62 102.62 83.67 83.87 0.077 0.077 0.596 1.170 169,063 4.19 2.2 0.12 0.24 Supercritical X F6-69 F6-70 Central Brisbane 6 8 VCP HDPE 458 458 112.46 112.46 90.43 90.43 0.048 0.048 0.470 0.928 4,729 0.72 14.4 0.03 0.04 Supercritical X F6-70 F6-71 Central Brisbane 6 8 VCP HDPE 266 266 90.43 90.43 83.67 83.67 0.025 0.025 0.342 0.674 9,457 0.06 1.2 0.04 0.05 Supercritical X F6-71 F6-72 Central Brisbane 8 8 VCP HDPE 249 249 83.67 83.67 61.12 61.22 0.091 0.090 1.389 1.270 182,648 4.48 3.3 0.12 0.25 Supercritical X F6-72 F5-31 Central Brisbane 6 8 VCP HDPE 255 255 61.12 61.12 38.25 38.45 0.090 0.089 0.642 1.261 186,774 4.48 14.4 0.12 0.25 Supercritical X F6-73 F5-27 Central Brisbane 6 6 VCP VCP 326 326 191.12 191.12 173.85 173.85 0.053 0.053 0.493 0.493 8,094 0.91 14.8 0.03 0.05 Supercritical F6-74 F5-29 Central Brisbane 6 6 VCP VCP 359 359 82.29 82.29 55.61 55.61 0.074 0.074 0.584 0.584 8,094 0.66 1.9 0.03 0.05 Supercritical F6-75 F6-77 Central Brisbane 8 8 PVC PVC 231 231 76.11 76.11 52.41 52.41 0.103 0.103 1.626 1.626 4,729 0.63 1.6 0.02 0.04 Supercritical F6-76 F6-77 Central Brisbane 6 6 VCP VCP 218 218 56.42 56.42 52.41 52.41 0.018 0.018 0.291 0.291 4,729 0.69 0.3 0.03 0.04 Supercritical F6-77 F6-79 Central Brisbane 6 6 VCP VCP 249 249 52.41 52.41 40.00 40.00 0.050 0.050 0.478 0.478 14,186 1.01 1.9 0.05 0.07 Supercritical F6-78 F6-79 Central Brisbane 6 6 VCP VCP 322 322 57.72 57.72 40.00 40.00 0.055 0.055 0.503 0.503 4,729 0.6 3.5 0.03 0.04 Supercritical F6-79 F5-33 Central Brisbane 6 6 VCP VCP 251 251 40.00 40.00 29.67 29.67 0.041 0.041 0.435 0.435 28,372 1.36 1.1 0.07 0.1 Supercritical F6-81 F6-82 Bayshore 6 6 VCP VCP 150 150 218.32 218.32 196.36 196.36 0.146 0.146 0.820 0.820 2,061 0.69 7.7 0.01 0.03 Supercritical F6-82 F6-83 Bayshore 6 6 VCP VCP 54 54 196.36 196.36 180.69 180.69 0.290 0.290 1.154 1.154 2,748 0.67 0.3 0.01 0.03 Supercritical F6-83 G6-01 Bayshore 6 6 VCP VCP 231 231 180.69 180.69 157.04 157.04 0.102 0.102 0.686 0.686 5,006 0.84 0.3 0.02 0.04 Supercritical F6-84 F6-32 Central Brisbane 6 6 VCP VCP 326 326 204.90 204.90 178.92 178.92 0.080 0.080 0.605 0.605 9,457 0.99 0.9 0.03 0.06 Supercritical F6-85 F6-84 Central Brisbane 6 6 VCP VCP 130 130 226.99 226.99 204.90 204.90 0.170 0.170 0.883 0.883 4,729 0.76 1.8 0.02 0.04 Supercritical F6-86 45' east of F6-04 Central Brisbane - 6 - VCP - 284 - 337.33 - 255.58 - 0.288 - 1.150 4,729 0.65 0.6 0.02 0.04 Supercritical X F6-86 F6-08 Central Brisbane 6 - PVC - 201 - 333.54 - 324.97 - 0.043 - 0.487 - 0.5 Subcritical X F6-87 F6-68 Central Brisbane 6 8 VCP HDPE 123 123 110.12 110.12 102.62 102.92 0.061 0.059 0.529 1.023 139,291.35 3.71 13.6 0.12 0.21 Supercritical X F6-88 F6-89 Central Brisbane - 8 - PVC - 207 - 343.42 - 333.25 - 0.049 - 1.125 4,728.60 1.44 0.4 0.02 0.04 Supercritical X F6-89 F6-90 Central Brisbane - 8 - PVC - 183 - 333.17 - 319.58 - 0.074 - 1.383 9,457.20 1.97 0.7 0.03 0.05 Supercritical X F6-90 F6-11 Central Brisbane - 6 - VCP - 62 - 319.25 - 313.50 - 0.093 - 0.653 14,185.80 2.15 2.6 0.04 0.07 Supercritical X F6-91 F6-92 Bayshore - 6 - PVC - 79 - 258.25 - 255.33 - 0.037 - 0.453 686.925 0.82 0.2 0.01 0.02 Supercritical X F6-92 F6-81 Bayshore - 8 - PVC - 292 - 255.25 - 218.57 - 0.126 - 1.799 1,373.85 1.3 0.1 0.01 0.02 Supercritical X F6-93 F6-38 Central Brisbane - 6 - PVC - 454 - 294.58 - 268.58 - 0.057 - 0.564 4,728.60 1.57 0.8 0.02 0.04 Supercritical X G5-02 G5-03 Bayshore 10 10 VCP VCP 355 355 14.16 14.16 12.07 12.07 0.006 0.006 0.642 0.642 99,353.85 1.93 18.3 0.17 0.17 Subcritical G5-03 F5-46 Bayshore 12 12 VCP VCP 368 368 12.07 12.07 9.90 9.90 0.006 0.006 1.639 1.639 101,377.35 1.88 7.3 0.16 0.16 Subcritical G6-01 G6-07 Bayshore 6 6 VCP VCP 237 237 157.04 157.04 132.77 132.77 0.102 0.102 0.686 0.686 7,263.30 0.77 1.3 0.03 0.05 Supercritical G6-02 G6-03 Bayshore 6 6 VCP VCP 128 128 264.54 264.54 257.94 257.94 0.052 0.052 0.487 0.487 2,258 0.62 0.5 0.02 0.03 Supercritical

Page 166 of 273 ends

EKI B50006.00 Page 7 of 7
Erler & Kalinowski, Inc.

AC = asbestos cement mgd = million gallons per day VCP = vitrified clay pipe CIP = Capital Improvement Project PVC = polyvinyl chloride WW = wet-well HDPE = high density polyethylene SFPUC = San Francisco Public Utilities Commission Notes:
(a) For modeling purposes, manning's n values of 0.010 for PVC, 0.011 for VCP and AC, and 0.012 for HDPE are assumed. (b) For pipes 10 inches or less, the design capacity is the flow at the maximum depth of one-half the pipe diameter. For pipes 12 inches or greater, the design capacity is the flow at the maximum depth of two-thirds the pipe diameter. (c) The original model already included the pipe attributes associated the new sewer between manholes F6-29 and F6-35, which replaced the existing sewer as part of a CIP.

Page 167 of 273 ends

City of Brisbane – Sewer System Management Plan 99

APPENDIX L
SSMP Internal Audit Report

Page 168 of 273 ends

1 City of Brisbane
Sewer System Management Plan Internal Audit Report
Audit Period: May 3, 2022, to May 2, 2025
The Sewer System Management Plan (SSMP) was designed to meet the requirements of State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) Order No. 2006-0003-DWQ, Statewide General Waste Discharge Requirements for Sanitary Sewer Systems (SSS WDR), and Order No. WQ 2013-0058-EXEC, which amends the Monitoring and Reporting Program of the original SSS WDR. The SSMP is a living document and is updated as needed to reflect changes to the SSMP elements and adjoining documents.

The purpose of this SSMP Internal Audit Report is to:
 Evaluate the implementation and effectiveness of the City of Brisbane’s SSMP to prevent sewer spills.
 Evaluate the City’s compliance with the Statewide WDR.  Identify any SSMP deficiencies in addressing ongoing spills and discharges to the wares to the State; and
 Identify necessary modifications to the SSMP to correct deficiencies, and to provide any recommendations or improvements that need to be made in the future.

Documentation of SSMP audits is kept on file at the City of Brisbane Department of Public Works, and a submission is made online in the California Integrated Water Quality System (CIWQS) database once the audit is completed.

The City of Brisbane audit team consists of collaboration between various members of the Department of Public Works, which includes engineering and field staff. According to the SSS WDR, the SSMP is to be audited internally at a minimum frequency of once every three years.

The next estimated SSMP audit is scheduled for 2028.

Each of the SSMP Elements below have been graded utilizing the following sufficiency rating system and have comments to explain the rating in the Discussion Section of each SSMP Element:
 Complies (C) – complies with all WDR objectives
 Substantially Complies (SC) – complies mostly with all WDR objectives  Partially Complies (PC) – complies with basic WDR objectives  Marginal Compliance (MC) – complies minimally with basic objectives of the WDR  Requires Update (RU) – requires updating to meet WDR objectives

Page 169 of 273 ends

2 Element I – Sewer System Management Plan Goal and Introduction Rating A. Does the Element include a narrative introduction section and is it current? RU B.

Does the Element regulatory context description include the required updating schedule for public consideration and governing board approval and adoption?
RU
C. Does the Element include information on SSMP auditing requirements and schedules? RU
D. Does the Element include schedules for incorporation of activities for the prevention of sewer spills? RU
E. Is the sewer system asset information current and complete as required in Attachment D, Section 1.3? RU
F. Are the sewer system maps referenced and current to the time of the SSMP update? MC
G. Does the Element include a list or description of all satellite systems flowing through the enrolled City sanitary sewer system? RU H. Are City goals appropriate and accurate? SC
Discussion:
 “Section 1 - Goals” should be renamed to “Element 1 – Sewer System Management Plan Goal and Introduction” to be consistent with the WDR.
 The current “Element 1” section is missing many of the required elements as outlined in the WDR Objectives, which includes a narrative introduction, regulatory context descriptions, auditing requirements and schedules, sewer system asset information, and an updated map of the current sewer system.
 Current goals can be written to be more specific for the City of Brisbane but still maintain consistency with WDR goals.
 All changes and missing information will be included in the next SSMP update (May 2, 2026) to meet WDR Objectives.

Page 170 of 273 ends

3 Element II – Organization Rating
A. Are City LRO and DS submitters stated in the SSMP currently identified in CIWQS? Have they been properly designated by the City? PC B.

Does the SSMP include names, contact information for management, administrative and maintenance positions responsible for specific Elements of the SSMP?
PC
C. Are the names and responsibilities current in the SSMP? PC D. Are the organizational lines of authority current and up-to-date on the City Organization chart? SC
E. Is the chain of communications for spill reporting complete from complaint through final approval of all spill event reporting? MC F. Are position descriptions and accurate portrayal of staff responsibilities? SC Discussion:
 “Section 2 - Organization” should be renamed to “Element 2 – Organization” to be consistent with the WDR.
 The current “Element 2” section needs to be updated with current contact information.  More details need to be added to this section about who the Legally Responsible Official (LRO) and Data Submitters (DS) are, the positions responsible for each of the specific Elements of the SSMP, and the chain of communications for spill reporting.  CIWQS will need to be updated to identify the City’s current LRO and Data submitters.  All changes and missing information will be included in the next SSMP update (May 2, 2026) to meet WDR Objectives.

Page 171 of 273 ends

4 Element III – Legal Authority Rating
A. Does the Element include an electronic link to City sewer system use ordinances, service agreements or other legally binding requirements? MC B. Has the sewer system use ordinances been changed or modified recently? If so, are the changes identified in the SSMP Change Log? C
C.

Does the Element include the following specific legal authorities:
a. Prevent illicit discharges to the sewer system?
b. Assure proper design and construction of connections to sewer system assets?
c. Proper access agreements and easements to ensure for maintenance, repairs and replacement of sewer laterals owned or operated by the City? d. Easement accessibility agreements for sewer system O&M, as applicable?
e. Limit discharges of fats, oils, and grease?
f. Proper enforcement authorities for violations of sewer program legal requirements?
g. Has the City conducted enforcement activities during the audit period? If so, please list the action.

SC
Discussion:
 “Section 5 – Legal Authority” should be renamed and moved to “Element 3 – Legal Authority” to be consistent with the WDR.
 An electronic link to the City’s ordinances should be added, and a description of relationships/agreements with other agencies should be included.  All changes and missing information will be included in the next SSMP update (May 2, 2026) to meet WDR Objectives.

The City’s SSMP Appendices includes the relevant municipal code sections regarding the overall Legal Authority the City has in compliance with the Statewide WDR. The City has conducted some enforcement activities during the audit period related to requiring property owners to repair defective private sewer laterals that could have led to potential SSOs had they not been addressed properly.

Page 172 of 273 ends

5 Element IV – Operations and Maintenance Program Rating A. Has the City developed map related procedures? Are the procedures up to date? SC
B. Is the service area boundary map current? Was it uploaded to CIWQS prior to 12/31/25? C
C. Are the sewer system maps up to date including any storm sewer conveyance facilities in the service area? SC
D. Are storm drainage facilities identified on the collection system maps? PC E. Does the City have a complete asset register of all City sewer program assets? SC
F.

Preventative Operations and Maintenance Program requirements:
a. Does the SSMP describe the current processes and procedures for maintaining the City collection system?
b. Has the City developed standard operating procedures for most collections system operational activities?
c. Has the City complied with the stated schedule for inspection and maintenance activities during the audit period?
d. Have areas with tree roots been identified and included on a high frequency inspection and maintenance listing?
e. Does the City have a well-defined force main inspection, operation and maintenance program?
f. Does the City properly assess operation and maintenance and condition of all pump station assets?
g. Were visual and closed-circuit inspections of manholes and sewer pipes completed as required throughout the audit period? h. Were areas of high consequence spill impacts identified and prioritized by the inspection system?
i. Was the maintenance program modified during the audit period as a result of post spill assessment evaluations including updating of the SSMP change log?
j. Were sewer program performance metrics met during the audit period?
k. Were historical performance results tracked and visually SC
G. Is the sewer program data management system current and effective in assisting with program effectiveness and implementation? SC

Page 173 of 273 ends

6 H. Are any changes to the program warranted to improve effectiveness and implementation? SC
I. Is the City sewer training program up to date? Require modification? SC J. Has regular WDR, CIWQS and SSMP training for LROs, DSs and City staff been completed as required? SC
K. Have all training activities been completed as required? SC L. Are contractors and parts providers available for emergency responses all hours? SC
M. Is the sewer program inventory of equipment up to date? PC N. Are critical spare parts available? C
Discussion:
 “Section 6 – Measure and Activities” should be renamed and moved to “Element 4 – Operations and Maintenance Program” to be consistent with the WDR.  A map of the sewer and storm systems should be included in the SSMP. This can be also added into an appendix if there are any anticipated changes in the future for updates.  Schedules and descriptions for preventative operation and maintenance activities (work orders, lift station cleaning, CCTV, etc.) should be added.  Staff training schedules and equipment inventories can be added as appendices.  All changes and missing information will be included in the next SSMP update (May 2, 2026) to meet WDR Objectives.

Page 174 of 273 ends

7 Element V – Design and Performance Provisions Rating
A.

Are the City design criteria, construction standards and specifications current? When was the last review and evaluation of the standards completed?
SC
B. Does the City have procedures and standards for inspection and testing for new, repair and rehabilitation of all sewer program assets? C C. Do any City standards require updates or revisions? C Discussion:
 “Section 7 – Design and Construction Standards” should be renamed and moved to “Element 5 – Design and Performance Provisions” to be consistent with the WDR.  Design criteria, construction standards and specifications should be reviewed periodically to confirm if any updates are necessary.
 All changes and missing information will be included in the next SSMP update (May 2, 2026) to meet WDR Objectives.

Page 175 of 273 ends

8 Element VI – Spill Emergency Response Plan Rating
A. Does the City have separate procedures for spill emergency response? C B. Has the City minimized the risk of sewage spills by reducing the impact and probability of spills? C
C. When was the SERP last updated or modified? C
D. What changes in the SERP or spill procedures were made resulting from Post Spill Assessments results? Identified in the SSMP change log? C E. Does the City have a single spill event documentation file containing all event documents? C
F. Has the City implemented pre-planned coordination and collaboration with storm drain agencies? Is the coordination documented? SC G. Has the City evaluated and/or adopted new technologies, practices, and equipment to expedite spill containment and recovery? SC H. Were all spill notification and reporting requirements met during the audit period? C
I. Has the City developed processes and procedure for the tracking and management of spill historical information? C
J. Has the LRO certified and added to the Annual Report the required system performance analysis? C
K. Did the City Annual Report include and certify that the SERP is effective and up-to-date and include input from field staff? C
L. Has the City assured conformance of all spill documentation with certified spill reports in CIWQS? C
M. Did the City conduct all required Post Spill Assessments following a spill event? C
N. Was the City required to prepare and submit to CIWQS a spill event technical report? If so, how many were competed? C
O. Did the City conduct regular field exercises on the SERP during the suit period? PC

Page 176 of 273 ends

9 Discussion:
 “Section 3 – Spill Emergency Response Plan” should be renamed and moved to “Element 6 – Spill Emergency Response Plan” to be consistent with the WDR.  The Spill Emergency Response Plan (SERP) should be reviewed by City staff on an ongoing basis to ensure that it is still effective in maintaining compliance with the spill response and reporting requirements of the Statewide WDR.  City staff should conduct regular field exercises to maintain consistency with all SERP procedures.
 Tables and flow charts should be added to section to provide more clarity for spill emergency response. Response and reporting documents can be added as an appendix.  All changes and missing information will be included in the next SSMP update (May 2, 2026) to meet WDR Objectives.

The City’s SERP was last updated in June 2023 as required by Statewide WDR. The City had no spill events requiring a technical report to be submitted.

Page 177 of 273 ends

10 Element VII – Sewer Pipe Blockage Control Program Rating A. Has the City determined that a blockage control program is warranted? If not, is proper justification documentation stated in the Element? C B. Does the City have an active design review and FOG inspection program? C C. Does the City have a well-defined blockage control (FOG) permitting program? C
D. Does the City regularly conduct food service establishment FOG control inspections including enforcement violations? C
E. Does the City have a comprehensive public outreach and education program including schedule for activities? PC
F. Does the City have a plan and schedule for disposal of pipe blockage substances? SC
G. Proper legal authority to prohibit discharges including measures to prevent spills and blockages? C
H. Requirements for the installation of grease removal devices? C I. Authority to inspect and enforce requirements for grease producing facilities? C
J. Has the City identified pipe segments subject to FOG blockages and properly established maintenance schedules for the segments? C K. Has the City implemented proper source control measures for FOG related discharges? C

Page 178 of 273 ends

11 Discussion:
 “Section 4 – Fats, Oils, and Grease (FOG) Control Program” should be renamed and moved to “Element 7 – Sewer Pipe Blockage Control Program” to be consistent with the WDR.
 Language in section should be updated to include rags and debris with traditional FOG.  Additional public outreach and education regarding FOG control should be made available to the public through the City website.
 All changes and missing information will be included in the next SSMP update (May 2, 2026) to meet WDR Objectives.

The City’s SSMP Appendices includes the relevant municipal code sections regarding the overall Legal Authority the City has to prohibit discharge of FOG to the collection system in compliance with the Statewide WDR. The City does not conduct its own food service establishment FOG control inspections and relies on the San Mateo County Health inspectors for these types of inspections. County inspectors will notify City staff if there is a problem at a particular facility requiring additional action.

Page 179 of 273 ends

12 Element VIII – System Evaluation, Capacity Assurance and Capital Improvements Rating
A. Has the City completed a hydraulic capacity evaluation of the collection system for areas that may contribute to sewage spills? C B. Has the City endured adequate sewer capacity to address City growth and peak wet weather flows? C
C. Does the City have an inflow and infiltration program and has it identified areas suspectable to these high flow conditions in the collection system? PC D.

Does the City have procedures for responses to unanticipated emergency situations that could occur in the collection system? Does the City conduct regular emergency response coordination activities?
SC
E.

Does the City have a prioritization system for corrective actions for all repair, renewal and replacement activities based on the severity and consequences from spills?
SC
F.

Does the City have an annual capital improvement program that requires input from field staff at all stages of capital project development and completion?
SC
G. Do all capital improvement projects include schedules and necessary project funding? SC
H. Does the capital improvement program ensure sustaining aging infrastructure using an asset management program to extend asset lifecycle? SC Discussion:
 “Section 8 – Capacity Management” should be renamed to “Element 8 – System Evaluation, Capacity Assurance and Capital Improvements” to be consistent with the WDR.
 The Sanitary Sewer System Master Plan, which includes additional information regarding the City’s future Capital Improvement Plan and budget, should be added as an appendix.  All changes and missing information will be included in the next SSMP update (May 2, 2026) to meet WDR Objectives.

Page 180 of 273 ends

13 Element IX – Monitoring, Measurement and Program Modifications Rating A. Does the SSMP accurately portray the methods of tracking and reporting of selected performance indicators or key performance indicators? PC B. Does the City have an adaptive management program
developed/implemented? PC
C.

Is the City able to sufficiently evaluate the effectiveness of each SSMP Element based on the information tracked? DO they support the Goals in Element 1?
SC
D. Has the City defined collection system performance standards or key performance indicators? PC
E.

Has the City identified and illustrated spill trends, including frequencies, locations and estimated volumes, maintenance performance results and other effectiveness indicators?
RU
F. Have the performance trends resulted in modifications or changes to SSMP elements and are the changes identified in the Change Log? PC Discussion:
 “Section 9 – Monitoring, Measurement, and Program Modifications” should be renamed to “Element 9 – Monitoring, Measurement and Program Modifications” to be consistent with the WDR.
 Additional information portraying the existing methods of tracking and reporting of key performance indicators and other effective indicators should be added.  All changes and missing information will be included in the next SSMP update (May 2, 2026) to meet WDR Objectives.

Page 181 of 273 ends

14 Element X – Internal Audit Rating
A. Are the Internal Audit Procedures current? SC
B. Does the Audit Report include operational personnel participation? C C. Does the Audit Report describe SSMP effectiveness evaluated for spill impacts included? SC
D. Were corrective actions stated, and a schedule developed? C Discussion:
 “Section 10 – SSMP Audits” should be renamed to “Element 10 – Internal Audits” to be consistent with the WDR.
 All changes and missing information will be included in the next SSMP update (May 2, 2026) to meet WDR Objectives.

Based on the new Statewide WDR audit requirements, the City will perform an audit on the SSMP at a minimal interval of three years moving forward.

Page 182 of 273 ends

15 Element XI – Communication Program Rating
A. Procedures for SSMP communications current? SC
B. Public input procedures for SSMP implementation/participation? SC C. Regular communications with satellite agencies conducted? SC D. Satellite City coordination documented. SC
E. Is Governing Body regularly updated on SSMP implementation? SC Discussion:
 “Section 11 – Communication Program” should be renamed to “Element 11 – Communication Program” to be consistent with the WDR.
 Additional information regarding sewer and the SSMP should be added to the website to enhance public communication outreach.
 All changes and missing information will be included in the next SSMP update (May 2, 2026) to meet WDR Objectives.

Page 183 of 273 ends

16 Summary of Recommended Actions and Timelines Date
Element 1.
 Rename “Section 1 - Goals” to “Element 1 – Sewer System Management Plan Goal and Introduction” to be consistent with the WDR.
 Add the missing required elements as outlined in the WDR Objectives, which includes a narrative introduction, regulatory context descriptions, auditing requirements and schedules, sewer system asset information, and an updated map of the current sewer system.
 Update current goals to be more specific for the City of Brisbane but still maintain consistency with WDR goals.

May 2, 2026
Element 2.
 Rename “Section 2 - Organization” to “Element 2 – Organization” to be consistent with the WDR.
 Update “Element 2” section with current contact information.  Add additional details about who the Legally Responsible Official (LRO) and Data Submitters (DS) are, the positions responsible for each of the specific Elements of the SSMP, and the chain of communications for spill reporting.
 Update CIWQS to identify the City’s current LRO and Data submitters.

May 2, 2026
Element 3.
 Rename and move “Section 5 – Legal Authority” to “Element 3 – Legal Authority” to be consistent with the WDR.
 Add an electronic link to the City’s ordinances and include a description of relationships/agreements with other agencies.

May 2, 2026
Element 4.
 Rename and move “Section 6 – Measure and Activities” to “Element 4 – Operations and Maintenance Program” to be consistent with the WDR.
 Include a map of the sewer and storm systems in the SSMP. This can be also added into an appendix if there are any anticipated changes in the future for updates.
 Add schedules and descriptions for preventative operation and maintenance activities (work orders, lift station cleaning, CCTV, etc.).
 Adde staff training schedules and equipment inventories as appendices.

May 2, 2026

Page 184 of 273 ends

17 Element 5.
 Rename and move “Section 7 – Design and Construction Standards” to “Element 5 – Design and Performance Provisions” to be consistent with the WDR.
 Review existing design criteria, construction standards and specifications to confirm if any updates are necessary.

May 2, 2026
Element 6.
 Rename and move “Section 3 – Spill Emergency Response Plan” to “Element 6 – Spill Emergency Response Plan” to be consistent with the WDR.
 Review the Spill Emergency Response Plan (SERP) to ensure that it is still effective in maintaining compliance with the spill response and reporting requirements of the Statewide WDR.
 Conduct regular field exercises to maintain consistency with all SERP procedures.
 Add tables and flow charts to section to provide more clarity for spill emergency response. Add response and reporting documents as an appendix.

May 2, 2026
Element 7.
 Rename and move “Section 4 – Fats, Oils, and Grease (FOG) Control Program” to “Element 7 – Sewer Pipe Blockage Control Program” to be consistent with the WDR.
 Update the language in section to include rags and debris with traditional FOG.
 Make additional public outreach and education regarding FOG control available to the public through the City website.

May 2, 2026
Element 8.
 Rename “Section 8 – Capacity Management” to “Element 8 – System Evaluation, Capacity Assurance and Capital Improvements” to be consistent with the WDR.
 Add the Sanitary Sewer System Master Plan, which includes additional information regarding the City’s future Capital Improvement Plan and budget, as an appendix.

May 2, 2026
Element 9.
 Rename “Section 9 – Monitoring, Measurement, and Program Modifications” to “Element 9 – Monitoring, Measurement and Program Modifications” to be consistent with the WDR.
 Add additional information portraying the existing methods of tracking and reporting of key performance indicators and other effective indicators.

May 2, 2026

Page 185 of 273 ends

18 Element 10.
 Rename “Section 10 – SSMP Audits” to “Element 10 – Internal Audits” to be consistent with the WDR.
 Add language regarding the updated audit period.

May 2, 2026
Element 11.
 Rename “Section 11 – Communication Program” to “Element 11 – Communication Program” to be consistent with the WDR.
 Add additional information regarding sewer and the SSMP to the website to enhance public communication outreach.

May 2, 2026
Audit Team: Date:

Prepared By: Date:

Reviewed By: Date:

Certified By: Date:

Approved for Filing On Date:

Matthew Lee, Dustin Cohn, Kessel Crockett 10/15/2025
Matthew Lee 10/15/2025
Jerry Flanagan 10/16/2025
Randy Breault 10/16/2025

Page 186 of 273 ends

City Council Staff Report
Meeting Date: April 2, 2026
From: Abby Partin , Human Resources Director
Subject: Adopt Resolution to Amend the Current Deputy Public Works Director Job Description
Recommendation
Staff recommend adoption of the resolution to amend the current Deputy Public Works Director job description.

Background
The Deputy Director of Public Works position plays a key leadership role within the Public Works Department, supporting the Public Works Director in overseeing departmental operations and services. The position has evolved over time to meet the operational needs of the Department, particularly in the areas of engineering, development review, and capital project delivery.

Staff has conducted a review of the existing job description to ensure it accurately reflects the current duties and responsibilities of the position.

Discussion
The proposed updates to the Deputy Director of Public Works job description are intended to clarify the responsibilities of the position and better reflect the current operational structure of the Public Works Department.

The revisions emphasize the Deputy Director’s role in overseeing the Department’s engineering functions, including development review, Capital Improvement Program (CIP) delivery, and regulatory compliance. The position will continue to support the Public Works Director in managing departmental programs and operations.

Additional language has been incorporated to clearly define the position’s responsibilities as City Engineer. These duties include oversight of engineering standards and the engineering review of development projects to ensure compliance with applicable regulations and City requirements.

Minor revisions have also been made throughout the document to improve clarity, correct typographical errors, and update terminology related to departmental programs and functions.

These updates have been reviewed and approved by the Mid-Management/Professional

Page 187 of 273 ends

Group.

These updates do not substantially change the scope, level, or classification of the position.

Rather, they provide clearer alignment between the job description and the duties currently being performed within the Public Works Department.

Fiscal Impact
There is no fiscal impact associated with updating the job description. The proposed changes do not modify the classification or compensation of the position, which is already budgeted for in the current and upcoming fiscal year.

Attachments

1. Resolution 2026-___
City Manager Approval
Jeremy Dennis, City
Manager
03/24/2026

Page 188 of 273 ends

RESOLUTION NO 2026-XX

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BRISBANE AMENDING RESOLUTION 2001-11 TO INCLUDE THE AMENDMENT TO THE

CLASSIFICATION OF DEPUTY PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR IN THE CLASS

SPECIFICATION MANUAL
WHEREAS, on February 13, 2001, the City Council approved Resolution 2001- 11 establishing the Classifications and Pay Plan and approving the class descriptions included in Exhibit “A” of said resolution for development of the Class Specification Manual; and
WHEREAS, the City Manager has established the need for the amendments in the classification of Deputy Public Works Director; and WHEREAS, the class description amendments for Deputy Public Works Director were developed in cooperation with and have been approved by the City Manager; and WHEREAS, this newly developed class description for Deputy Public Works Director meets the requirements established Rule 6.02b of the City of Brisbane Personnel Rules and Regulations for the Class Specification Manual.

NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Brisbane resolves as follows:

The class description for the classification of Deputy Public Works Director in Exhibit “A” is approved for inclusion in the Class Specification Manual.

Section 1. Resolution Number 2000-04 is
_________________
Coleen Mackin, Mayor
I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2026-XX was duly and regularly adopted at a regular meeting of the Brisbane City Council on April 2, 2026, by the following vote:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent: None
Abstain: None
_____________________
Ingrid Padilla, City Clerk

Page 189 of 273 ends

CITY OF BRISBANE

DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS
Definition
Plans, directs and manages assigned functional areas within the engineering or utility division in connection with engineering design, construction, inspection, transportation projects and the capital improvement program; staffs one or more citizen advisory committees; performs advanced professional engineering assignments on a wide range of municipal projects of a complex nature; serves as project manager on a variety of projects; supervises engineering and technical staff of the department directly or through subordinate levels of supervision on a day to day basis; functions as department head in their absence as assigned. Serves as the City Engineer responsible for engineering standards, development review, and oversight of public works engineering activities.

Class Characteristics
Deputy Director of Public Works – City Engineer is a Deputy Director level engineering classification responsible for overseeing the City’s engineering functions and performing a wide variety of engineering duties requiring independent judgement and initiative in prioritizing, scheduling, assigning and coordinating work. This class requires registration as a professional engineer. This class is distinguished from all other engineering classes by its supervisory and administrative responsibilities over a wide range of duties as well as the requirement to perform the more complex engineering and project management assignments.

Assignments and projects may be long-term or may constitute a major portion of a continuous or comprehensive engineering or construction program. Typically assigned functional areas include private development review and plan checking, oversight of regulatory compliance (e.g., Municipal Regional Permit [NPDES], Cal-OSHA, SWRCB/RWQCB non-utility related orders), , waste franchise, Sierra Point Lighting & Landscape District, and Capital Improvement Program.

Deputy Director of Public Works – Utilities is a Deputy Director level engineering classification that performs a wide variety of engineering duties that require exercising independent judgment and initiative in prioritizing, scheduling, assigning and coordinating work. This class requires registration as a professional engineer, plus certification as a Water Distribution Operator II and California Water Environment Association I. This class is distinguished from all other engineering classes by its supervisory and administrative responsibilities over a wide range of duties as well as the requirement to perform the more complex engineering and project management assignments. Assignments and projects may be long-term or may constitute a major portion of a continuous or comprehensive engineering or construction program.

Typically assigned functional areas include overall responsibility for the water, sewer, and storm drain systems, including water quality monitoring, and utility areas within the Guadalupe Valley Municipal Improvement District.

Supervision Received and Exercised
Receives general direction from the Public Works Department Head.

Provides general supervision to engineering, maintenance and administrative support staff.

Examples of Important and Essential Duties- the duties described below are provided as examples and are not to be considered as exclusive or all inclusive:
• Recommends and assists in development and implementation of departmental policies, goals, and objectives.
• Plans, directs, and coordinates engineering work programs and activities within the Public Works Department, directly and through subordinate levels of supervision. • Manages the City’s Capital Improvement Program and Projects; supervises, coordinates, and reviews all public works engineering activities, including engineering design, inspection, and survey; contract administration, and construction management for projects planned and approved by City Council; Exhibit A

Page 190 of 273 ends

Deputy Director of Public Works

Page 2 ends

prepares plans, specifications and estimates. Deputy Director of Public Works – City Engineer has overall responsibility for the city’s CIP. Deputy Director of Public Works – Utilities has responsibility for utility funded projects within the CIP.
• Supervises staff assigned, including scheduling, assigning, prioritizing, and reviewing work; training and evaluating staff; approving time off; and developing effective recommendations on all employee actions.
• Assigns work and exercises general supervision of office and field staff in order to effectively utilize their services and accomplish objectives.
• Oversees consultants and professionals hired by the City for the purposes of designing and completing public works construction projects and studies.
• Establishes criteria for design, construction, and inspection of public works projects. • Oversees the inspection of public works construction by contractors for established plans and specifications.
• Supervises and participates in the development and administration of the department’s capital and operating budgets; directs the forecast of additional funds needed for construction, staffing, equipment, materials, and supplies; monitors and approves expenditures. • Prepares work programs and special engineering studies. • Reviews and prepares specifications and obtains bids for construction and maintenance projects; accepts or rejects such specifications and bids; verifies computations, plans, specifications, and estimates for public works facility’s projects; reviews and signs engineering drawings and land record maps. • Evaluates and applies for grants; provides for administration and oversight of reporting requirements. • Conducts negotiations on engineering matters and accepts or rejects change order requests related to contracts; addresses contractor claims.
• Manages administrative matters; prepares and oversees budgets and monitors monthly expenditures; manages requests for additional funding.
• Prepares fee assessments and agenda reports.
• Develops record maintenance systems, procedures, and training necessary for maintaining effective liaison with other City departments.
• Serves as department head in the absence of the director, including attending and participating in City Council, community and board and commission meetings.
• Responds to questions and requests from the general public including conducting correspondence and attending meetings.
• Provides high-level staff support to various City Council subcommittees, appointed citizen committees and working groups; prepares or reviews agendas, content and committee member feedback; determines which new programs, practices and policies introduced may be of value to the City; coordinates or implements projects including grant applications, budgeting, design and oversight of construction. • Serves as Operations Section Chief or Public Works staff to Operations Section in the event of an emergency requiring activation of Emergency Operations Center; receives training in duties; participates in training exercises, reviews Emergency Operations Plans and emergency operating procedures for roadways, features, and facilities,
Researches and become familiar with new methods and technologies.

Qualifications
Knowledge of:
• Principles, methods and practices of civil engineering as applied to the planning, designing and construction of municipal public works facilities, including streets, sewers, traffic and construction projects.
• Design principles, methods, materials, and techniques used in the construction and maintenance of public works, utilities or building construction projects. • Design principles, strengths of materials, principles of mechanical, electrical and structural engineering and surveying as they apply to the design of public works structures.

Page 191 of 273 ends

Deputy Director of Public Works

Page 3 ends

• Engineering and construction management methods.
• Technical, legal, financial and public relations issues involved in the conduct of municipal public works programs.
• Modern developments, current literature and sources of information on engineering laws and regulations.
• Applicable Federal, state and local laws, legal issues and regulatory codes related to design and construction.
• Principles and practices of municipal management, including supervision and evaluation of personnel, budget planning and preparation and public relations.

Ability to:
• Apply computer programs related to the work, including presentation, project management, GIS, and data management applications; use a personal computer, the Internet and other engineering technological resources.Prepare engineering estimates, plans, drawings and specifications. • Perform difficult engineering work in design and construction of public works facilities. • Interpret and accurately apply applicable Federal, state, and local policies, procedures, codes, laws, ordinances and regulations.
• Understand and implement laws, regulations, policies and procedures. • Prepare construction contracts and requests for proposal; administer contracts. • Plan, organize and supervise the work or engineering projects. • Plan, supervise, direct, schedule and evaluate the work of subordinate staff. • Develop and implement improvements to systems, organization, and operations within the division. • Take a proactive approach to customer service issues and hold others within the department responsible for this effort.
• Make process improvement changes to streamline procedures. • Work in a safe manner following City safety practices and procedures in a variety of environments; model and coach others in correct City safety practices; identify, correct, and report safety hazards. • Maintain confidentiality regarding sensitive information. • Represent the City and the department effectively in contacts with representatives of other agencies and the public.
• Communicate clearly and concisely, both verbally and in writing; prepare clear and concise written reports.
• Make effective oral presentations.
• Establish and maintain cooperative and effective working relationships with those contacted in the course of the work, such as with employees, contractors, consultants, elected and appointed officials, and the public.

Education and Experience: Any combination of experience and training that would provide the required knowledge, skills, and abilities would be qualifying. A typical way to obtain the knowledge, skills, and abilities would be:

Education: Graduation from an accredited college or university with a Bachelor’s Degree in civil engineering or a closely related field. Master’s Degree in Engineering, Public Administration or Business Administration is desirable.

Experience: Five years of professional civil engineering experience at a supervisory/management level involving design, plan checking, project management and construction management. Municipal professional engineering and supervisory experience is highly desirable.

Deputy Director of Public Works – Utilities should have significant experience working directly with staff at California State Water Resources Control Board Division of Drinking Water, Regional Water

Page 192 of 273 ends

Deputy Director of Public Works

Page 4 ends

Quality Control Board (e.g., San Francisco Bay), and local health enforcement agencies (e.g., San Mateo County Environmental Health).

Deputy Director of Public Works – City Engineer should have experience using online plan checking such as Clariti and also be familiar/competent with Bluebeam Revu 21.

License: Possession of a valid certificate of registration as a Civil Engineer issued by the State Department of Registration for Professional Engineers. Possession of or the ability to obtain a valid California Class C driver’s license and have a satisfactory driving record. Such licenses and certifications shall be maintained during employment.

Deputy Director of Public Works – Utilities is also required to have certification as a Water Distribution Operator II and California Water Environment Association II. This class is distinguished from all other engineering classes by its supervisory and administrative Working Conditions: Work in a standard office environment with some exposure to outdoors, mechanical hazards, traffic, and electrical hazards. Travel to different sites and locations.

Physical Demands: Sufficient mobility and physical flexibility to negotiate difficult project sites and construction terrain where crouching, bending, stooping, climbing and/or kneeling would be required.

Vision to adequately and quickly review plans and specifications, read printed materials, and a computer screen. Mental alertness and comprehension to learn and retain technical and administrative information, terminology, equipment, policies, procedures and safety practices. Physical stamina to work extended or irregular hours and attend lengthy meetings and attentively follow proceedings. Ability to maintain sustained posture in a seated position for prolonged periods of time. Hearing and speech to communicate in person and over the telephone.

Approved Date: October 16, 2014
Resolution: 2014-42
Revised Date: April 2, 2026
Resolution: 2026-
Bargaining Unit: Mid-Management/Professional Employees Group Resolution: 2014-43

Page 193 of 273 ends

City Council Staff Report
Meeting Date: April 2, 2026
From: Caroline Cheung, Assistant to the City Manager
Subject: Halloween Street Closure Event Review
Recommendation
Staff recommend that the Council receive an informational report related to the planning and staffing efforts related to last year’s Halloween Street Closure event.

Background
At their meeting of August 6, 2025, the Complete Streets Safety Committee (CSSC) discussed a potential Halloween street closure after residents present at the meeting and City Manager Dennis contacted CSSC Chair Wirowek about having this item on the CSSC agenda. After a lengthy discussion, the CSSC’s final recommendation was: hard closures between 5 – 9 PM of Mariposa Street, Monterey Street, and Mendocino Street between Visitacion Avenue and Alvarado Street, closing Napa Avenue between Mariposa Street and Mendocino Street, leaving ingress at San Bruno Avenue down to Mendocino Street and egress at Mariposa Street, and closing San Francisco Avenue between San Bruno Avenue and Alvarado Street and Plumas Street between San Francisco Avenue and Mariposa Street.

At the September 4, 2025 City Council meeting, Police Commander Garcia presented the CSSC’s recommendation, adding that immediate and robust public messaging would be initiated to notify residents and visitors well in advance. After Council discussion, staff was directed to do full road closures from San Bruno Avenue and the “web” streets from Mariposa to Klamath between Alvarado and Visitacion Avenue from 6 – 8 PM on Halloween, with an emphasis on safety, volunteer outreach, signage, robust communications, and additional parking options.

With the October STAR being laid out the following week, Communications staff quickly began preparing an article, “Spooktacular Streets Ahead! Halloween Night Road Closures”, working in conjunction with Public Works and Police (see Attachment 1). The same information would be shared in the September 10th Blast and posted on the City’s website and social media (Facebook, Instagram, Nextdoor, and X).

On October 1st, staff had an initial planning meeting – members from Public Works, Police, City Manager’s Office, and Parks and Recreation – discussed a traffic safety plan provided by Sgt.

Vega and on October 7th, an additional meeting was held with Volunteer Lead Jessica Aloft and Rachel Ennis. A mock-up of the volunteer badge was shared (see Attachment 2), and Police stated that volunteers would have safety vests and flashlights distributed to all volunteers

Page 194 of 273 ends

upon check-in. It was also stressed that volunteers’ role would be to ensure the barricades stayed in place and if any issues arose, the volunteer was to call Jessica or the Police Dispatch Number, both of which were found on their badges. Doorhangers (see Attachment 3) were put together by the Communications Team between these two meetings and hung on every door within the closure area, as well as adjacent properties located just outside the closure, on October 15th.

Electronic communications were updated in October to include additional parking areas at the Catholic Church and Brisbane Village Shopping Center once confirmed by the respective property managers. Public Works set out the changeable message sign on Old County and Bayshore to alert motorists of the closure 2 weeks in advance.

The afternoon before the closure, an SMC Alert was sent indicating that planned road closures would be in effect the following night between 6-8 PM (see Attachment 4). Two more SMC Alert Alerts were sent on Halloween reminding subscribers about the closure, one at 3 PM and the other at 6 PM.

Between 6-7 PM, stories were shared on the City’s Instagram and Facebook capturing the volunteers stationed at each of the closures. In the days following, the 18 volunteers who manned 9 intersections and the 5 Youth Advisory Committee members who helped along Napa Ave were sent a survey to see how they felt the event went (see Attachment 5). The December STAR featured them on the cover along with a recap of the event and a QR code to a residents survey to get their feedback on how the pilot went (see Attachment 6). Doorhangers to this latter survey were also left on every door within the closure area as well as adjacent properties.

Discussion
Highlights from the survey, of which there were 86 participants, include:
• Most respondents were positive about the event and road closures, with several stating that everything was well done and should continue as-is. • A recurring suggestion was to improve safety, especially by adding more crossing guards at busy intersections and increasing lighting in dark areas. • Several respondents recommended expanding the closure area, particularly to include more of Alvarado Street due to high foot traffic and popular attractions. • Outreach and communication were highlighted, with calls for more engagement with residents in the closure area and better preparation for next year, especially since Halloween will fall on a Saturday. There were also suggestions to involve those outside the closure area, such as through candy donations or volunteering, and to invite local businesses to participate.

A full summary of the survey can be found in Attachment 7.

Page 195 of 273 ends

Staff welcomes feedback and ideas the Council would like to consider for Halloween 2026, before coming back in July with a recommendation for this year’s event.

Fiscal Impact
Police overtime for the Halloween street closure event amounted to 11 hours or $1,221.84.

Public Works overtime amounted to 31 hours or $4,376.85. Total overtime thus was $5,598.69.

Attachments

1. October 2025 STAR article

2. Volunteer badge

3. Halloween doorhanger

4. SMC Alert (10/30/2025)

5. Volunteer Evaluations

6. December 2025 STAR Cover

7. Halloween Survey Results
City Manager Approval
Jeremy Dennis, City
Manager
03/24/2026

Page 196 of 273 ends

ǇȩȼȲȸ̛ȧȯȬȮȨȷȲȹȲȯȸȱȷȨȨȵƘȳȯȨȤȶȨȦȤȯȯƘ
ȷȨȻȷƘȲȵȨȰȤȬȯǔȲȯȸȱȷȨȨȵǁȲȲȵȧȬȱȤȷȲȵ
ǈȨȶȶȬȦȤƿȯȲȩȷȤȷȭƛȤȯȲȩȷˍȪȰȤȬȯƛȦȲȰƳ˞˛˟Ƶ
ˢˠˡƵ˚˛˛˜ȥȼǍȦȷȲȥȨȵ˜˞ ƛǑȫȨȬȶȯȲȲȮȬȱȪ
ȷȲȩȬȯȯȤȷȯȨȤȶȷ˝˚ȹȲȯȸȱȷȨȨȵȶȯȲȷȶƛ
ȷȫ
ǕȬȷȫȼȲȸȵȶȸȳȳȲȵȷƘȺȨȦȤȱȰȤȮȨȷȫȬȶ
ȳȬȯȲȷȳȵȲȪȵȤȰȤȶȸȦȦȨȶȶȤȱȧȨȱȶȸȵȨ
ǆȤȯȯȲȺȨȨȱȬȱǀȵȬȶȥȤȱȨȬȶȤȩȸȱȤȱȧȶȤȩȨ
ȱȬȪȫȷȩȲȵȤȯȯƛ
IǣȇƳɖɀȒȇ³ȒƬǣƏǼxƺƳǣƏ
۬ƬǣɎɵȒǔƫȸǣɀƫƏȇƺƬƏ ۬ƬǣɎɵȒǔƫȸǣɀƫƏȇƺƬƏ
۬ƫȸǣɀƫƏȇƺד׎׎גח
۬ƫȸǣɀƫƏȇƺƬƏ ۬ƫȸǣɀƫƏȇƺƬƏ
ˆˣˢˢ˞˧˔˖˨˟˔˥ˆ˧˥˘˘˧˦ʴ˛˘˔˗ʔ
ǒȫȬȶǆȤȯȯȲȺȨȨȱƘǀȵȬȶȥȤȱȨȺȬȯȯȥȨ
ȳȬȯȲȷȬȱȪȶȲȰȨȷȫȬȱȪȱȨȺȷȲȬȰȳȵȲȹȨ
ȶȤȩȨȷȼȩȲȵȷȵȬȦȮƵȲȵƵȷȵȨȤȷȨȵȶƚȫȤȵȧȶȷȵȨȨȷ
ȦȯȲȶȸȵȨȶȬȱȶȨȯȨȦȷȱȨȬȪȫȥȲȵȫȲȲȧȶƛǒȫȬȶ
ȰȤȵȮȶȷȫȨȩȬȵȶȷȷȬȰȨȷȫȨǁȬȷȼȫȤȶ
ȬȰȳȯȨȰȨȱȷȨȧȷȫȬȶȷȼȳȨȲȩȦȯȲȶȸȵȨƘȤȱȧ
ȬȷȦȲȰȨȶȷȫȤȱȮȶȷȲȷȫȨȧȨȧȬȦȤȷȬȲȱȤȱȧ
ȦȲȯȯȤȥȲȵȤȷȬȲȱȲȩȷȫȨǁȲȰȳȯȨȷȨǑȷȵȨȨȷȶ
ǑȤȩȨȷȼǁȲȰȰȬȷȷȨȨƶȨȶȳȨȦȬȤȯȯȼ
ǁȲȰȰȬȷȷȨȨǁȫȤȬȵǃȰȬȯȼǕȬȵȲȺȨȮƶ
ȤȯȲȱȪȺȬȷȫȵȨȶȬȧȨȱȷȶǈȨȶȶȬȦȤƿȯȲȩȷȤȱȧ
ǑȤȵȤȫǋȬȯȯȶƘȺȫȲȫȤȹȨȥȨȨȱȺȲȵȮȬȱȪ
ȦȯȲȶȨȯȼȺȬȷȫȷȫȨǁȬȷȼȷȲȨȱȫȤȱȦȨ
ȳȨȧȨȶȷȵȬȤȱȶȤȩȨȷȼȲȱȲȸȵȶȷȵȨȨȷȶƛ
ǒȫȨȦȯȲȶȸȵȨȶȺȬȯȯȥȨȬȱȨȩȩȨȦȷȩȲȵȤ
ȯȬȰȬȷȨȧȷȺȲƵȫȲȸȵȺȬȱȧȲȺƘˠƶˢǎǋȲȱ
ǆȤȯȯȲȺȨȨȱȱȬȪȫȷƘȷȲȤȯȯȲȺȷȫȲȶȨ
ȦȲȰȰȸȷȬȱȪȫȲȰȨȩȵȲȰȺȲȵȮȷȬȰȨȷȲ
ȵȨȷȸȵȱȥȨȩȲȵȨȷȫȨȶȷȵȨȨȷȶȦȯȲȶȨƛ
ǕȫȤȷȷȲǃȻȳȨȦȷ
ǑȷȵȨȨȷȶȰȤȵȮȨȧȬȱȥȯȤȦȮȲȱȷȫȨ
ȰȤȳȺȬȯȯȥȨȦȯȲȶȨȧȷȲȹȨȫȬȦȯȨ
ȷȵȤȩȩȬȦȧȸȵȬȱȪȷȫȨȦȯȲȶȸȵȨȳȨȵȬȲȧƛ
ǎȸȥȯȬȦǕȲȵȮȶȺȬȯȯȶȨȷȸȳ
ȥȤȵȵȬȦȤȧȨȶȤȷȷȫȨȧȨȶȬȪȱȤȷȨȧ
ȬȱȷȨȵȶȨȦȷȬȲȱȶȥȨȪȬȱȱȬȱȪȤȷˠǎǋƛ
ǎȤȵȮȬȱȪȺȬȯȯȥȨȰȤȧȨȤȹȤȬȯȤȥȯȨ
ȷȫȤȷȨȹȨȱȬȱȪȤȷȶȨȹȨȵȤȯȯȲȦȤȷȬȲȱȶƘ
ȬȱȦȯȸȧȬȱȪƚ
ǀȵȬȶȥȤȱȨǎȲȶȷǍȩȩȬȦȨ
ǎȤȵȮǊȤȱȨ
ǁȬȷȼǆȤȯȯ
ǁȬȷȼǆȤȯȯƿȱȱȨȻ
ǄȲȵȰȨȵǀȤȱȮȲȩƿȰȨȵȬȦȤȯȲȷ
ǒȫȨǁȬȷȼȺȬȯȯȤȯȶȲȥȨȸȶȬȱȪǁȫȤȱȪȨȤȥȯȨ
ǋȨȶȶȤȪȨǑȬȪȱȶƘȷȫȨȨȯȨȦȷȵȲȱȬȦ
ȶȬȪȱȥȲȤȵȧȶƘȤȱȧǑǋǁƿȯȨȵȷȷȲȱȲȷȬȩȼ
ȵȨȶȬȧȨȱȷȶȤȱȧȹȬȶȬȷȲȵȶȤȥȲȸȷȷȫȨ
ȦȯȲȶȸȵȨȶȬȱȤȧȹȤȱȦȨƛ
ǕȲȵȮȬȱȪǒȲȪȨȷȫȨȵȩȲȵǑȤȩȨȷȼ
ǕȨȤȳȳȵȨȦȬȤȷȨȷȫȨȹȲȯȸȱȷȨȨȵȶȺȫȲȺȬȯȯ
ȫȨȯȳȨȱȶȸȵȨȥȤȵȵȬȦȤȧȨȶȶȷȤȼȬȱȳȯȤȦȨȤȱȧ
ȰȤȮȬȱȪȤȱȱȲȸȱȦȨȰȨȱȷȶȷȲȷȵȬȦȮƵȲȵƵ
ȷȵȨȤȷȨȵȶȥȨȩȲȵȨˢǎǋȷȫȤȷȷȫȨȶȷȵȨȨȷȶȺȬȯȯ
ȥȨȵȨƵȲȳȨȱȬȱȪƘȤȯȯȲȺȬȱȪȷȫȨǀȵȬȶȥȤȱȨ
ǎȲȯȬȦȨǂȨȳȤȵȷȰȨȱȷȷȲȶȷȤȼȰȲȥȬȯȨȤȱȧ
ȩȲȦȸȶȨȧȲȱȮȨȨȳȬȱȪȨȹȨȵȼȲȱȨȶȤȩȨƛ
ǂȸȵȬȱȪȷȫȨȦȯȲȶȸȵȨƘȦȤȵȶȳȤȵȮȨȧȲȱ
ȦȯȲȶȨȧȶȷȵȨȨȷȶȰȸȶȷȵȨȰȤȬȱȬȱȳȯȤȦȨȷȲ
ȳȵȲȷȨȦȷȷȵȬȦȮƵȲȵƵȷȵȨȤȷȨȵȶƛǕȨȤȶȮȷȫȨ
ȦȲȰȰȸȱȬȷȼȷȲȶȸȳȳȲȵȷȷȫȬȶȨȩȩȲȵȷȤȶȺȨȯȯƚ
ȬȩȼȲȸȱȲȷȬȦȨȤȱȼȷȫȬȱȪȦȲȱȦȨȵȱȬȱȪƘ
ȳȯȨȤȶȨȦȤȯȯȷȫȨ˜˞ƴˡǂȬȶȳȤȷȦȫǊȬȱȨȤȷ
ƭ˞˛˟Ʈ˞ˠˡƵ˛˜˛˜ƛ
ʻ˔˟˟ˢ˪˘˘ˡˁ˜˚˛˧˅ˢ˔˗ʶ˟ˢ˦˨˥˘˦
Ǉȩ
Attachment 1

Page 197 of 273 ends

Attachment 2

Page 198 of 273 ends

This marks the first time the City has
implemented this type of closure, and we
wanted to make sure you were aware.

The closures will be in effect for a 2-hour
window, 6 – 8 PM on Halloween night, to
allow those commuting home from work
time to return before the streets close.

The Brisbane PD will have a strong presence
that evening, in addition to Public Works
and volunteers, all working together to
ensure a smooth night. Should you need to
leave your home for an emergency, please
call the Police Dispatch Number prior to
departure at: (415) 467-1212.

For any questions about this event, please
call Caroline at (415) 508-2157. Otherwise, we
thank you for planning ahead!
Road Closures
Planned
Attachment 3

Page 199 of 273 ends

!
"
#$%&

'#()*+,
(%-*

%+
-)(. / 0
12
3456457478
898:
; <2
&*=
%
&

'))2
&*,$
#$%&
)%-
*. 12%&#
!

$
&*
#*&
>
?
!

-
@

A%&
>

(&>

2%
?%&&
>

%>
)#

#
A
$

!!
)
!

%
7 2

A&>A (

A
&*2=
!
(
:

B
C
;=

%A
2#

)((&*
2(

!
(
A

(

&
$
!

#
)#
- 12

"
#$%&

;D
A
2%+

%
#
&*
?

#
&)

+
&&*=
&
%>>&

;$)
@
#
%&>
+&

#=
%
A
&*
*
2

% #(2
&*2-
2>

&

>

%+

(

*
&) =
?
%#

)%
2

;)

D#?%)2
E($

FGHIG
JI
>
?%

%9 KL38M
L:N
3737- +

!A
?%
&*
A
$

%+%%$

%
2

!A&*
)%&#
&
A&9 "
#$%&

;#
!!)

O%>
!
P%>%?

%2)
2
)2
Q%
Q%
&&
R S
(

"%&
!
(

)%
?%
&*
"
#$%&

T%*

2??&*

&

O%# =
2%&

!

!
%&&*
!
(
?%)&*
%&
&
R
>%
>
+

#
%#
&
+
2)
#
A
$

A2&
2

%-
Attachment 4

Page 200 of 273 ends

!"#
#$%"&"'
!$"(

)**

*
+ +,- **
.
/*
.

/*
*

*

*0

**1

.+
+ +1

,2('3!
$3

Page 201 of 273 ends

Mariposa and Alvardo
Lots of kids/families came down to the end of Mariposa/Alvarado to trick or treat. They were very happy that the road was closed.

In the future, we need a barricade at Mariposa and Alvarado and a big barricade at Plumas and Mariposa. Or close the street at Plumas and San Francisco. Around 4 or 5 cars drove down Plumas between 6-7pm (during the closure) and turned left on Mariposa. And then later, maybe after 7pm, a Waymo vehicle came down Mariposa twice.

It was fun! Thanks, the families really appreciated the street closures.

This content is neither created nor endorsed by Google.

Halloween Volunteer Evaluation
While the thoughts are still fresh, please provide your feedback on this inaugural street closure in Brisbane for the organizers to review!
Where were you stationed?
What do you think worked well?
What suggestions do you have should the streets be closed again next year? Any final thoughts you'd like to share from a volunteer's perspective? Forms
Attachment 5

Page 202 of 273 ends

Visitation/Monterey
Everything!
We should have a fundraiser Halloween photo shoot like we use to have .

I appreciate all the effort that made our event safe and fun.

This content is neither created nor endorsed by Google.

Page 203 of 273 ends

Napa valley
Everything
After the streets are closed make sure no cars come through. 3-4 cars went through the ally way and also on the street It was very fun
This content is neither created nor endorsed by Google.

Page 204 of 273 ends

Mariposa and visitacion
Street closures, lots of lights
Crossing guards might be a good idea. More lighting. Maybe even a block party with carnival games.

It was fun! Would love to join again next year
This content is neither created nor endorsed by Google.

Page 205 of 273 ends

Mendocino
The closures were greatly appreciated. The families could meander safely without any concern of cars. Having volunteers at each point was so great.

Next year we should ask the local restaurants to be involved with special treats to eat or drink for purchase. And bring in a food truck area and more family activities near the park. Perhaps start the closure earlier to accommodate starting earlier.

Many parents commented on how dark the streets are. The streets are quite dark without the house lighting and poor city street lamps. The city should reassess the lighting since it should not outweigh the safety concerns. The sidewalks are uneven. And at many points the sidewalks are blocked by cars. We are lucky there were no major injuries.

This content is neither created nor endorsed by Google.

Page 206 of 273 ends

mariposa and visitacion
it was a fun experience with all the tricker treaters
Standing next to the flashing lights on the police car blocking Mariposa were very bright. Did we need them? I wonder? We had sandwich boards stating the street was closed as well.

I enjoyed the evening! thanks everyone for the opportunity This content is neither created nor endorsed by Google.

Page 207 of 273 ends

Alvarado and Mendocino
Everything- it was well done!
None
Best volunteer gig I have had!
This content is neither created nor endorsed by Google.

Page 208 of 273 ends

Mendocino and Visitacion
Having a police cruiser blocking the street. I think having the streets closed actually CONTAINED a majority of the trick or treating to the "pie".

I had to block the Mendocino exit from Midtown market using one of the barricades intended for the intersection. In the end, it worked out fine.

Please make sure EVERY resident of Brisbane has an opportunity to complete a survey. It will be critical to capture if the respondent is a resident of the closed "pie" or lives outside of it. Thx.

This content is neither created nor endorsed by Google.

Page 209 of 273 ends

5-points (Vis/San Bruno Ave)
BPD car & 2 officers at San Bruno Ave by the Hardware Store. We needed them there to help manage the "zoners" who were still driving out of the closure zone in the first hour (probably guests of residents who didn't realize the streets had closed). Also we had a very large semi truck come up Vis around 7:15pm, that had to back down and negotiate turning back out of town. Definitely needed BPD assistance with that. We also had a Waymo break down partway in the intersection near the post office, so we also needed BPD to help manage traffic flow around that. 2 officers was fine, one more would have been even better :)
FOUR volunteers at 5-points instead of two, for when it starts to get dark (around 7pm). Between 7-8:15pm, just two of us volunteers were staffing the crosswalks (Visitacion mostly, but also the cross street, San Francisco Ave) to help people cross safely. We really could have used one person at each point of the intersections, as it was difficult to anticipate pedestrian and vehicle movements, and also to verbally coordinate between us two, since we were on opposite corners of the large intersection.
i love love LOVE that this happened!!! 100% of volunteers showed up to check-in on time and get to their stations. I was so proud of our community - it was a magical night. Big thanks to our City staff and BPD who made it a seamless, safe, and successful event!!
This content is neither created nor endorsed by Google.

Page 210 of 273 ends

San Bruno and Alvarado
Well organized!
More promotional signs?
It was super easy and enjoyable to volunteer.

This content is neither created nor endorsed by Google.

Page 211 of 273 ends

Eagles Club
Everything
All good
So glad we are doing this
This content is neither created nor endorsed by Google.

Page 212 of 273 ends

Mariposa and Visitacion
Everything!
Yes!
Accolades to Caroline, Jeremy, and Jessica and everyone else who contributed to “Safe Streets” Halloween 2025! This content is neither created nor endorsed by Google.

Page 213 of 273 ends

Alvarado and San Bruno
I think it all worked well.

I think what we did this year worked really well! If we can find more business willing to let people use their lots for parking, the streets were still very congested around the closures. And if we can expand the parking footprint, additional volunteers at 5 Corners and the top of Alvarado, directing people where to park.

I really enjoyed volunteering. Only a few grumblers who didn't like that they couldn't park at their home but the majority of people were so grateful for the safe streets for the kiddos.

This content is neither created nor endorsed by Google.

Page 214 of 273 ends

Mariposa and Alvarado
Lots of signs, great police presence! Unappreciated how quickly the police came when we had the Waymo issue.

I’d suggest having some folks at the entrance of town to help direct people for parking. Also alerting ride shares - particularly Waymo. We had one Waymo cone on our street multiple times.

I think we were at the wrong location honestly. The street barricades were at Plumas, so it would probably be good to move us up to that location next year! Oh! And it would be fun to do a trunk or treat as well for locals who live in the mountain. I will come prepared with that next year for sure.

This content is neither created nor endorsed by Google.

Page 215 of 273 ends

Monterey and Alvarado
Everything was great. We had the police chief at our intersection and so it was so smooth.

Cant think of anything
This content is neither created nor endorsed by Google.

Page 216 of 273 ends

Alvarado and monterey
None
This content is neither created nor endorsed by Google.

Page 217 of 273 ends

Alvarado and Mendocino
Barricades , having fluorescent wand flag and vests,
Having police come thru occasionally and acknowledge drivers and guests — and check on me :) Hours 6-8pm received extremely well by walkers - absolutely loved the safety emphasis May need to go to 8:15 ( for open up clarity) as drivers try ing to return at 8:00 got a little anxious Ability to park in open areas
Residents were extremely generous and went all out with candy - it was fun for all Alvarado residents were not clear the street was to be closed - though some at checkpoint received lots of kids - others up the block did not get as many trick or treaters
Possibly on Alvarado / Mendocino have a flashing message or barricade sign - walkers were not cognizant/ aware street had traffic
Had to also encourage drivers to slow down as Alvarado really dark .

Thought it was fabulous - residents and guests were so happy This content is neither created nor endorsed by Google.

Page 218 of 273 ends

Halloween Street Closure observations from Visitacion/Klamath Many families and individuals expressed appreciation for the closure! Drivers asked for help to find parking. (Suggestion: have a map of the parking options.) Less vehicle traffic than in prior years and most drivers were cooperative. A handful of drivers were upset at the closure. We had two requests to leave from the closed area.

Fewer trick/treaters at this intersection compared to prior years. Less that half by my estimation. This may have been due to being at a corner of the closure area. Only a trickle of the trick or treaters crossed Visitacion to seek other participating households.

Trick/treaters tended to bunch up curbside or at corners, leaving drivers uncertain about their intention. Narrow sidewalks don’t provide pedestrians many options. Trick/treaters seemed to not understand that Visitacion was not closed. Had to call out to several groups who were walking in the middle of the street to ask them to stay on the sidewalk.

Drivers dropping off trick/treaters did not choose safe spots for doing so.

Chris Florkowski - Nov 3 2025

Page 219 of 273 ends

This was the setup at
Visitacion and Klamath.

Fortunately, we had enough
cones to place two in the
daylight space or we would
have spent the entire two
hours shooing away people
trying to park there.

The intersection is difficult
as there are only two
legitimate crosswalks and
neither addressed the
needs of the evening.

Chris Florkowski - Nov 3 2025

Page 220 of 273 ends

There was one household
giving out candy on upper
Visitacion. (See orange )
Trick/treaters would stroll up
Klamath up to the police car
and then cross over upper
Visitacion as shown by the
arrow. Often oblivious traffic.

Perhaps they did not
understand they were stepping
outside the area protected by
the closed roads. If we should
do this again, preventing
people from walking through
that area is something we
should consider.

Chris Florkowski - Nov 3 2025

Page 221 of 273 ends

For the first time ever, Brisbane closed
several streets in Central Brisbane on
Halloween from 6-8 PM, as shown in
the below map:

City of Brisbane Monthly Newsletter
December 2025 Volume 23, Issue 12
Everything went relatively smoothly,
thanks to assistance from the Brisbane
Police Department, Public Works, the
City Manager’s Office, and 18 brave
community volunteers who manned 9
intersections, as well as five members
of the Youth Advisory Committee
(YAC) who ensured the barricades on
Napa Alley stayed in place.

After the event, volunteers provided
their perspectives of how the pilot
planned road closures went, with
many citing how they want to
volunteer in this capacity again, with
one even stating that it was “the best
volunteer gig I have had!” Kudos to
Volunteer Coordinator, Jessica Aloft!
Another respondent cited how crucial
it would be to see that every Brisbane
resident has an opportunity to provide
their feedback, with it being critical to
capture if the respondent lives within
the closed "pie" or resides outside of it.

So here is your chance!
Scan the QR code or swing by City Hall
or the Sunrise Room by December 31st!
2025 Spooktacular Streets Recap
Share your feedback on how the pilot went!
STAR
THE
Attachment 5

Page 222 of 273 ends

Halloween Street Closure Survey
Period: November 15, 2025 - December 31, 2025
Do you reside WITHIN or OUTSIDE OF the road closure area? 86/86 - Multiple choice - choose one - required
I reside WITHIN the road closure zone 57% (49 choices)
I reside OUTSIDE OF the road closure zone 39.5% (34 choices) I don't live in Brisbane but visited on Halloween 3.5% (3 choices) Attachment 7

Page 223 of 273 ends

What is your street block within the closure zone?
49/49 - Multiple choice - choose one - required
Mendocino St 300-399 Block 12.2% (6 choices)
San Bruno Ave 100-199 Block 10.2% (5 choices)
San Bruno Ave 300-399 Block 10.2% (5 choices)
Mendocino St 100-199 Block 10.2% (5 choices)
Mendocino St 200-299 Block 10.2% (5 choices)
Klamath St 300-399 Block 10.2% (5 choices)
San Bruno Ave 400-499 Block 6.1% (3 choices)
Mariposa St 200-299 Block 6.1% (3 choices)
Monterey St 200-299 Block 6.1% (3 choices)
San Bruno Ave 1-99 Block 4.1% (2 choices)
Mariposa St 100-199 Block 4.1% (2 choices)
Monterey St 300-399 Block 4.1% (2 choices)
San Bruno Ave 200-299 Block 2% (1 choice)
Monterey St 100-199 Block 2% (1 choice)
Klamath St 200-299 Block 2% (1 choice)

Page 224 of 273 ends

As a resident who lives outside of the closure zone, how would you describe your experience with this first year of the pilot program? 34/34 - Long answer - required
Most respondents described their experience with the pilot program very positively, frequently mentioning increased safety for children and families, a more relaxed atmosphere, and a stronger sense of community. Many appreciated being able to walk freely without worrying about cars, and noted that the event felt well-organized and enjoyable. Several respondents highlighted that the closure hours were convenient and allowed residents to get home before festivities began.

A few comments mentioned specific logistical issues, such as bottlenecks and heavy traffic on Alvarado, which was not closed and became congested. One respondent requested that the number of closed streets not be increased in future years. Overall, there was strong support for continuing the program as it is.

Do you think the road closures contributed to a safer environment for trickor-treaters and pedestrians? 86/86 - Multiple choice - choose one - required
Strongly agree 81.4% (70 choices)
Agree 15.1% (13 choices)
Disagree 2.3% (2 choices)
Strongly disagree 1.2% (1 choice)

Page 225 of 273 ends

How informed were you about the road closures in advance? 86/86 - Multiple choice - choose one - required
Very well 93% (80 choices)
Somewhat well 5.8% (5 choices)
Not very well 1.2% (1 choice)
Not at all 0% (0 choices)
What improvements would you suggest for future Halloween events and/or road closure planning?
56/86 - Long answer - optional

Page 226 of 273 ends

Many respondents praised the event’s organization, smooth execution, and safety improvements, with several stating no changes were needed. However, several key themes for improvement emerged:
**1. Extend or Adjust Street Closures:**
Many suggested expanding the closure area to include more streets, especially Alvarado and Visitacion. Others recommended extending closure hours, either starting earlier for younger children or ending later.
**2. Safety and Traffic Control:**
Multiple respondents noted issues with cars entering closed areas and suggested more signage, better barricades, and additional crossing guards or volunteers at key intersections.

Lighting was also a common concern, with several asking for better illumination at corners and throughout the area.
**3. Inclusion and Community Participation:**
There was strong interest in involving residents outside the closure zone, either by allowing them to set up tables within the closed area, donating candy, or helping with decorations.

Several suggested a candy donation or fund to help offset the cost for residents in the busiest areas.
**4. Communication and Outreach:**
Some respondents wanted more advance notice and clearer communication, especially to those living in or near the closure area.
**5. Other Suggestions and Concerns:**
- A few mentioned accessibility issues for residents with disabilities or those needing to drive in/out during closures.
- Some suggested rotating which streets are closed each year to share the impact. - There were isolated comments about littering, volunteer numbers, and the desire for more activities (e.g., haunted house, trunk-or-treat, business participation).

A small minority felt the closure was unnecessary or had negative impacts.

Overall, the event was widely appreciated, with most feedback focused on expanding, improving safety, and increasing inclusivity for future years.

Page 227 of 273 ends

Would you be interested in helping out with volunteer efforts (helping the day of or picking up trash the day after)?
86/86 - Multiple choice - choose one - required
No 67.4% (58 choices)
Yes 32.6% (28 choices)
If you answered yes to the question before, please provide your email. 28/28 - Short answer - required

Page 228 of 273 ends

City Council Staff Report
Meeting Date: April 2, 2026
From: Julia Ayres, Acting Community Development Director, Ken Johnson, Senior Planner
Subject: Consider an Urgency Ordinance for a Moratorium on New Residential Development in the NCRO-2 District
Recommendation
Staff recommend the Council adopt an urgency ordinance prohibiting new residential development (moratorium) in the NCRO-2 Downtown Brisbane Neighborhood Commercial District, to allow time to study amendments to the NCRO-2 District zoning provisions.

Background
Setting: The NCRO-2 District makes up Brisbane’s downtown core, with a mix of retail, restaurant, office and residential uses. The District extends along both sides of Visitacion Avenue and the first block of San Bruno Avenue. The General Plan Land Use and Zoning District maps are provided as Attachments 1 and 2.

The NCRO-2 District includes a number of restaurants and retail stores, personal services shops, professional offices, a chiropractic office, as well as community service club, community church and the Brisbane Library. As a mixed-use district, it also includes a mix of housing, with most residential units being located above or behind the non-residential spaces. It is generally walkable to most Central Brisbane residences and thus plays an important role in the character and community life in Brisbane. However, it faces significant challenges as further described below.

General Plan & Zoning: The General Plan land use designation, Neighborhood Commercial/Retail/Office (NCRO), provides for a subarea “devoted to a range of local retail and service uses, including shops, restaurants, medical, professional and administrative offices and other uses of the same general character. Public and semipublic facilities may be located under this designation. Residential uses may be permitted conditionally in implementing zoning districts”. There are two implementing neighborhood commercial districts, the NCRO-1 Brisbane Village and NCRO-2 Downtown Brisbane. The NCRO-1 District does not permit residential uses. In the NCRO-2 District, residential uses may only be permitted subject to a use permit and must be located above and/or behind non-residential uses. The NCRO-2 District also requires ground-floor storefront space at a minimum of 600 sq ft, although lesser floor area may be approved by the Planning Commission if it finds“…that such lesser area is as large as possible for the intended storefront use, given the size, configuration, and physical constraints of the structure and the site.”

Page 229 of 273 ends

There are no housing density standards provided in the General Plan, nor through the NCRO-2 zoning. The zoning provides that the housing density in a mixed-use development is to be established by use permit. The form of development is subject to design permit approval, with maximum height standards of 36 feet, a lot coverage maximum of 90 percent, and with no setback requirements from the front and side lot lines and 10 foot setback in the rear. Lot sizes in this District may be as small as 2,500 square feet.

Given the location within the Central Brisbane core, generally small sizes of the lots, and corresponding building floorplates, the businesses in this District generally serve local residents and employees. The small scale of commercial uses, competition with housing demand, and recent State housing laws are challenging the future of this mixed-use District.

Applicable State Housing Laws and Housing Element: In response to the Statewide housing crisis, recent State laws have prioritized housing development and limited the authority of local jurisdictions over housing development projects and may place the future of commercial uses in the NCRO-2 District at risk.

Senate Bill SB 35 (2017), Housing Accountability Act, required cities to streamline the process for reviewing certain housing development proposals. In general, State law limits the City’s discretion in reviewing housing projects to verifying that they comply with objective development standards; presuming the jurisdiction has adopted objective design and development standards (ODDS). While the work of establishing ODDS throughout the City’s residential districts was undertaken circa 2021/22, City Council has not yet adopted ODDS for this District.

In the 2023-2031 Housing Element, Program 7.A.2, the City committed to “Amend the NCRO-2 district regulations to adopt objective design standards for mixed-use residential development”, with a projected implementation timeline of 5/31/2025. The Housing Element did not identify the NCRO-2 District as having significant new housing development potential, and no specific sites or housing units are relied upon towards meeting the City’s RHNA obligation beyond six market rate housing units in the development pipeline. Development of a two-unit mixed-use development at 18 Visitacion Avenue site is near completion, and a building permit application is in process for four units at 213 Visitacion Avenue. Since the filing of the building permits vested their design permit and use permit entitlements, these projects would not be impacted by a potential moratorium.

The State’s adoption of SB 330 (2019) further restricts how cities process housing development projects. As summarized by the California Department of Housing and Community Development, SB 330 “…makes changes to land use and zoning law to remove barriers and impediments to building new housing in urban areas of the state. To increase transparency and certainty in the development application process, SB 330 allows a housing developer to submit a “preliminary application” to a local agency for a housing development project. Submittal of a pre-application allows a developer to provide a specific subset of information on the proposed

Page 230 of 273 ends

housing development ahead of providing the full amount of information required by the local government for a housing development application. Upon submittal of an application and a payment of the permit processing fee, a housing developer is allowed to “freeze” the applicable fees and development standards that apply to their project while they assemble the rest of the material necessary for a full application submittal.” A preliminary application for residential development in the NCRO-2 district has recently been submitted under SB 330, as further described below. Given the limited design information that is now required to “freeze” requirements on a development proposal, there’s a potential for the application to be completed and submitted soon.

Also, California Density Bonus Law (Gov. Code §§65915 - 65918) allows developers to increase density on properties above the maximum set by the General Plan if a certain number of units are provided to moderate or low-income households. Although Brisbane’s General Plan does not have a density maximum for the District and therefore there is no theoretical or actual maximum “base” density, developers can use the density bonus law in the NCRO-2 district to request concessions or incentives (limited in number based on the percentage and affordability level of affordable units), any number of waivers of development standards that would preclude construction of the project at the requested density, and reductions in on-site parking. Under the law, incentives and concessions must be related to reducing the cost of the development.

Discussion
The City is committed to providing its share of the region’s housing need, as demonstrated through the Housing Element which commits the City to meeting and exceeding its Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA). However, these recent state laws have the effect of prioritizing housing over local serving commercial uses and may effectively limit the City’s control over both the form and scale of housing development and ultimately may serve to supplant the local serving commercial uses.

Former 23 Club & Restaurant and 36-50 San Bruno Avenue Proposal: The former 23 Club and the adjacent 23 Club Restaurant, at 23 and 25 Visitacion Ave, have been vacant for approximately 10 years or more. These properties along with the parking lot to the rear of the 23 Club, located at 36-50 San Bruno Ave, are all owned by Horsepower Holdings LLC. These properties together are all now the subject of an application for a preliminary housing development permit under SB 330, which proposes to demise both the bar and restaurant buildings. The project as presently proposed would include nine (9) primary dwelling units spread across both the Visitacion Avenue and San Bruno Avenue sites, with no commercial space. As of the writing of this staff report, the application has not provided the minimum information necessary to benefit from the vesting and review timelines provided under SB 330.

However, depending on the timing of the applicant’s submittal of the necessary information, the application may ultimately not be subject to the moratorium.

With this application, the applicant has raised challenges to the City’s authority to require that

Page 231 of 273 ends

a development be mixed-use in this District, contending that a Density Bonus Law concession, under Government Code §65915(d) and (e), may be used to circumvent the General Plan and the implementing zoning provisions in regard to uses. While the City’s legal counsel has indicated that Density Bonus Law may not be used to circumvent land uses, but are intended to address development standards, this application raises concerns and broader questions about the future of the City’s downtown commercial district.

In brief, the proposal brings to the fore potential vulnerability and highlights a need to study the NCRO-2 zoning district regulations to determine if amendments are necessary in order to preserve Brisbane’s small commercial core. The concern is that without clearer standards in terms of commercial use requirements, housing density and building form, the existing commercial spaces may be reduced over time, or completely eliminated.

Proposed Moratorium on Residential Uses: California Government Code §65858 allows for jurisdictions to adopt as an urgency measure an interim ordinance prohibiting any uses, for 45 days, by four-fifths vote of the legislative body. After notice pursuant to the Government Code and public hearing, the legislative body may extend the interim ordinance for 10 months and 15 days and thereafter extend the interim ordinance for an additional year. Any extension shall also require a four-fifths vote. Not more than two extensions may be adopted.

In this case, a moratorium could be imposed on all applications that have not yet received planning entitlement for development of new primary dwelling units in the NCRO-2 District, to allow the City time to consider potential revisions to the zoning ordinance, and to provide for better controls on the uses and/or form of development in the District. The Government Code requires findings that there is a current and immediate threat to the public health, safety, or welfare. Such finding can be made in that removal of commercial space due to residential development would result in the loss of neighborhood businesses and is contrary to the General Plan.

Should Council adopt the moratorium, staff will prioritize Planning Commission and subcommittee work on this topic. It’s anticipated that an extension beyond the initial 45 days will be needed to allow time to study the issues and prepare any zoning ordinance amendments that may be needed to address the concerns indicated above.

A draft urgency ordinance is provided as Attachment 3.

Development of accessory dwelling units (ADUs) associated with existing primary single-family or multi-family dwellings would not be included in the moratorium, so as to not conflict with State ADU law.

Fiscal Impact
No new impacts. Housing Element Program 7.A.2 already committed the City to study the District, as provided above.

Page 232 of 273 ends

Attachments

1. General Plan Land Use Diagram

2. Zoning District Map

3. Draft Moratorium Ordinance
City Manager Approval
Jeremy Dennis, City
Manager
03/25/2026

Page 233 of 273 ends

C
a
rt
e
r
St
Bay Ridge Dr
Cielito
Dr
Esq
uina
Dr
Oakri
d
g
e
Dr
Martin
Trl
F
a
r
ri
er
Pl
Martin St
m Way
Ca
rriza
l
St
Geneva Ave
Guadalupe Canyon Pkwy
W Hill Pl
Bay
Ridge Dr
W Hill Dr
Carter St
S
Hill Dr
Highcrest Ln
Windcrest Ln
unrise Way
Alla
n
St
Schwerin
St
Accacia
St
Ca
lg
a
ry
St
Pueblo
St
Castillo
St
Midway Dr
Oriente
St
Rio
Verde
St
Martin St
Velasco Ave
Sunrise Way
Sa
ntos
St
MacDonald Ave
Main St
Partridge Ave
Ca
rriza
l
St
Geneva Ave
Linda Vista
Dr
Elfi
n
Ct
Swallowtail Ct
Guadalupe Canyon Pkwy
Golden Aster Ct
Elderberry Ln
Martin St
Bay Ridge Dr
W Hill
D
r
Silverspot
D
r
Mission Blue Dr
Schwerin
St
Lily Ct
Acca
cia
St
Butterweed
Ln
Oriente
St
Jacqueline Ct
Main St
Callippe Ct
Sage St
R
ad
io Rd
S Hill Dr
Quarry Rd
Mission Blue Dr
Valley Dr
N
Hill Dr
Monarch
Dr
Radio Rd
Ra
d
i
o
R
d
Northcrest Dr
Baypark Cir
Parkgrove Dr
Ta
lber
De
Sunnydale Ave
MacDonald Ave
Ta
lbert
St
Pea
body
St
T
u
n
n
e
l
A
v
e
Beatty Ave
Esta Ave
Bayshore
Blvd
Geneva Ave
I
nd
ust
ri
al
Way
T
u
n
n
e
l
Av
e
Guadal
upe
Canyon
Pkwy
Main St
Ch
e
cke
rs
pot Dr
Baysh
ore
Blvd
Valley Dr
Tu
nnel
Ave
Park
Pl
Old County Rd
Park Ln
Solano St
N Hill Dr
Mission
Blue
Dr
San Francisco Ave
Bayshore Blvd
Radio Rd
R
a
d
i
o
R
d
San
Bruno Ave
San Benito Rd
Visita
c
i
o
n
Ave
Glen
Park
Way
Humboldt Rd
S
i
e
r
r
a
P
oi
nt
Rd
Alvarado St
T
r
i
n
ity
Rd
Arth
u
r
D
r
Mendocino St
So
l
a
n
o
St
Monterey St
S
a
nta
Clara
St
Mariposa St
Radio Rd
Radio Rd
Lathrop Ave
Harney Way
101
Harney Way
Alanna Way
Beatty Ave
101
Tu
n
n
e
l
A
v
e
Tunnel Ave
Lagoon Way
Si
e
rra
P
oi
nt
P
k
w
y
Bayshore Blvd
Humboldt
Rd
Tulare
St
Lake St
A
n
n
i
s
Rd
J
o
y
Av
e
S
i
e
r
r
a
P
o
i
n
t
P
k
w
y
B
a
ysh
o
re
Blvd
Radio Rd
Shoreline
Ct
Shoreline
Ct
S
i
e
r
ra
Point Pkwy
Bayshore
Blvd
Jamestown Ave
Marina Blvd
Shore
l
i
n
e
Ct
Sierra Point Pkwy
M
a
r
i
na
Blvd
M
a
r
i
n
a
B
l
v
d
C
arter St
Bay Ridge Dr
Cielito
Dr
Esq
uina
Dr
Oakrid
g
e
Dr
Martin
Trl
F
arrier Pl
Martin St
m Way
Carrizal St
Geneva Ave
Guadalupe Canyon Pkwy
W Hill Pl
Bay
Ridge Dr
W Hill Dr
Carter St
S
Hill Dr
Highcrest Ln
Windcrest Ln
unrise Way
Alla
n
St
Accacia
St
Calg
ary
St
Pueblo
St
Castillo
St
Midway Dr
Oriente
St
Rio
Verde
St
Martin St
Velasco Ave
Sunrise Way
Sa
ntos
St
MacDonald Ave
Main St
Partridge Ave
Carrizal St
Geneva Ave

COW PALACE

KELLOCH

VELASCO PARK

BAYSHORE

HEIGHTS PARK

BAYSHORE
PARK

BAYSHORE

ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL
Linda Vista
Dr
Elfi
n
Ct
Swallowtail Ct
Guadalupe Canyon Pkwy
Golden Aster Ct
Elderberry Ln
Martin St
Bay Ridge Dr
W Hill Dr
Silverspot
Dr
Mission Blue Dr
Schwerin
St
Lily Ct
Acca
cia
St
Butterweed
Ln
Oriente
St
Jacqueline Ct
Main St
Callippe Ct
Sage St
R
adio Rd
S Hill Dr
Quarry Rd
Mission Blue Dr
Valley Dr
N
Hill Dr
Monarch
Dr
Radio Rd
Ra
dio
R
d
Northcrest Dr
Baypark Cir
Parkgrove Dr
Talber
De
Sunnydale Ave
MacDonald Ave
Talbert
St
Pea
body
St
Tunnel A
v
e
Beatty Ave
Esta Ave
Bayshore
Blvd
Geneva Ave

OUR LADY OF
THE

VISITACION
SCHOOL
Ind
ustrial Way
T
u
n
n
el Av
e
Guadalupe
Canyon
Pkwy
Ch
e
ckers
pot Dr
Baysh
ore
Blvd
Northwest
Bayshore
Valley Dr
Tu
nnel Ave
Park
Pl
Old County Rd
Park Ln
N Hill Dr
Mission
Blue
Dr
San Francisco Ave
Bayshore Blvd

OLD QUARRY
RD.

LIPMAN
MIDDLE
SCHOOL
Radio Rd
R
a
dio
R
d
San Benito Rd
Visitacio
n
Ave
Humboldt Rd
Sierra P
oint
Rd
Alvarado St
Trinity
Rd
Arth
ur Dr
Sola
n
o
St
Monterey St
S
a
nta
Clara
St
Mariposa St

FIRTH PARK

BRISBANE

ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL
Central
Brisbane
Brisbane
Radio Rd
Radio Rd
Harney Way
LITTLE

HOLLYWOOD
PARK
Shoreline Trail
Harney Way
Alanna Way
Beatty Ave
Tu
n
n
el A
v
e
Tunnel Ave
Lagoon Way
Sierra
P
oint P
k
w
y
Bayshore Blvd
Humboldt
Rd
Tulare
St
Lake St
Annis Rd
Sierra
P
oint P
k
w
y
B
a
ysh
ore
Blvd
Southeast
Bayshore
Southwest
Bayshore
Radio Rd
Shoreline
Ct
Shoreline
Ct
Sierra
Point Pkwy
Bayshore
Blvd
Bay Trail
Bay Trail
Bay Trail
Bay Trail
Shoreline Trail
Jamestown Ave
Bay Trl
Marina Blvd
Bay
Trl
Shorelin
e
Ct
Sierra Point Pkwy
M
arina
Blvd
Marina Blv
d

C/P-U PD - RP
HC
HC

NER - PD - R

PD - S C/R/O
TC
TC
PR-TC
PR-TC
M/L/B
M/L/B
M/L/B

PD - NR
R
R

N C/R/O

N C/R/O
R

PD - TC
R
OS OS
OS
OS
OS
OS
OS
OS
OS
OS
OS

SP C/R/O

S C/R/O
PFP
PFP
PFP
PFP
PFP
PFP
PFP
PFP
PFP
PFP
PFP
PFP
PFP
PFP
PFP
Sources: Esri, TomTom, Garmin, FAO, NOAA, USGS, (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community GP Land Use Designations
PD - NR Baylands Planned Development - Non Residential
PD - RP Baylands Planned Development - Residential Permitted R Brisbane Acres
R Central Brisbane
R Central Brisbane B
C/P-U Commercial Public Utilities
PD - S C/R/O Guadalupe Hills Planned Development
HC Heavy Commercial
M/L/B Marsh/Lagoon/Bayfront
N C/R/O Neighborhood Commercial/Retail/Office
NER - PD - R Northeast Ridge Planned Development - Residential OS Open Space
PR-TC Parkside Residential
PFP Public Facilities and Parks
PD - TC Quarry Planned Development
SP C/R/O Sierra Point Commercial/Retail/Office
S C/R/O Subregional Commercial/Retail/Office
TC Trade Commercial
¯
02/04/2026

B R I S B A N E ' S L A N D U S E D E S I G N A T I O N S

Page 234 of 273 ends

&
\ G '
& '
T '
N G '
7 ) 3
: \
&
$
G S & \ 3N \
: 3
\ G '
: '
&
'
: G /
: \
$
6FKZHULQ 6W
$
& \
3 &
E
G \ '
2 9 G
9 $
: \
' G $
3 G $
$
/ G 9 '
&
&
G S & \ 3N \
G $ &
G E \ /
\ G '
:
'
S '
'
K
/ \ &
$
G /
2 - T &
& SS &
G G '
4 \ G
'
9 \ '
'
K '
G
G G
K '
\S N &
7 E
'
\G $
' G $
7 E
3 E G\
7 $
$
\ K G
$
G : \
7 $
G S & \ 3N \
0DLQ 6W
&K N S '
\ K G
9 \ '
7 $
3 N 3
2 G & \ G
3 N /
6RODQR 6W
'
'
) $
\ K G
G G
G G
6DQ %UXQR $YH
G
9 $
*OHQ 3DUN :D\
E G G
3 G
$ G
7 \ G
$ K '
0HQGRFLQR 6W
\
&
S
G G
G G
/DWKURS $YH
\ : \
$ : \
7 $
7 $
/ : \
3 3N \
\ K G
E G G
7 / N
$ G
-R\ $YH
3 3N \
\ K G
G G
K & K
&
3 3N \
\ K G
-
$
G
K
&
3 3N \
G
G
6W &DUWHU 6W
'U 5LGJH %D\ 5LGJH 'U
&LHOLWR 'U &LHOLWR 'U
(VTXLQD 'U (VTXLQD 'U
'U

DNULGJH
2DNULGJH 'U
7UO 0DUWLQ 7UO
3O )DUULHU )DUULHU 3O
6W 0DUWLQ 6W
:D\ P
& &DU L O 6W &DUUL]DO 6W
$YH *HQHYD $YH
3NZ\
&DQ\RQ
*XDGDOXSH *XDGDOXSH &DQ\RQ 3NZ\
3O +LOO : 3O
'U
5LGJH
%D\ 5LGJH 'U
: +LOO 'U : +LOO 'U
6W &DUWHU 6W
'U +LOO 6 'U
+LJKFUHVW /Q
:LQGFUHVW /Q :LQGFUHVW /Q
XQULVH :D\ XQULVH :D\
$OODQ 6W $OODQ 6W
$FFDFLD 6W $FFDFLD 6W
&DOJDU\ 6W &DOJDU\ 6W
3XHEOR 6W 3XHEOR 6W
&DVWLOOR 6W &DVWLOOR 6
'U 0LGZD\ 'U
2ULHQWH 6W 2ULHQWH 6W
5LR 9HUGH 6W 5LR 9HUGH 6W
6W 0DUWLQ 6W
$YH 9HODVFR 9HODVFR$YH
:D\ XQULVH D6\XQULVH :D\
6DQWRV 6W 6DQWRV6W
$YH 0DF'RQDOG 0DF'RQDO $YH
6W 0DLQ 6W
$YH 3DUWULGJH 3DUWULGJH $YH
& L D DUU ] O DUUL]DO 6W6W &DUUL]DO 6W
$YH *HQHYD $YH
&2: 3$/$&(
.(//2&+
9(/$6&2 3$5.
%$<6+25(
+(,*+76 3$5.
%$<6+25(
3$5.
6 KZ
%$<6+25(
(/(0(17$5<
6&+22/
/LQGD 9LVWD 'U/LQGD 9LVWD 'U
&W (OğQ &W
&W
6ZDOORZWDLO6ZDOORZWDLO &W
3NZ\ &DQ\RQ *XDGDOXSH *XDGDOXSH&DQ\RQ 3NZ\
$ &W *ROG VWHU *ROGHQ $VWHU&W
/Q (OGHUEHUU\ (OGHUEHUU\ /Q
6W 0DUWLQ 6W
'U 5LGJH
%D\ 5LGJH 'U
'U +LOO
: +LOO'U
6LOYHUVSRW 'U6LOYHUVSRW 'U
'U %OXH 0LVVLRQ 0LVVLRQ %OXH 'U
6FKZHULQ 6W 6FKZHULQ 6W
/LO\&W
$FFDFLD 6W $FFDFLD 6W
/Q
%XWWHUZHHG%XWWHUZHHG /Q
2ULHQWH 6W 2ULHQWH6
&W -DFTXHOLQH -DFTXHOLQH &W
6W 0DLQ 6W
&W &DOOLSSH &DOOLSS &W
6W 6DJH
5G
5DGLR 5G 'U +LOO 6 'U
5G 4XDUU\ 5G
'U %OXH 0LVVLRQ 0LVVLR %OXH 'U
'U 9DOOH\ 'U
1 +LOO 'U1 +LOO '
'U 0RQDUFK 0RQDUFK 'U
5G
5DGLR 5G
5G
5DGLR 5G
'U 1RUWKFUHVW 1RUWKFUHVW 'U
&LU %D\SDUN %D\SDUN &LU
3DUNJURYH'U
7DOEHU
'H
$YH 6XQQ\GDOH 6XQQ\GDOH $YH
$YH 0DF'RQDOG 0DF'RQDOG $YH
7DOEHUW 6W 7DOEHUW6W
3HDERG\ 6W 3HDERG\ 6W
$YH 7XQQHO$YH
%HDWW\ $YH
(VWD $YH
%D\VKRUH %OYG %D\VKRUH %OYG
$YH *HQHYD $YH
285 /$'< 2)
7+(
9,6,7$&,21
6&+22/
:D\ ,QGXVWULDO ,QGXVWULDO :D\
$YH 7XQQHO $YH
3NZ\ &DQ\RQ *XDGDOXSH *XDGDOXSH &DQ\RQ 3NZ\
'U
&KHFNHUVSRW&KHFNHUVSRW 'U
%OYG %D\VKRUH %D\V RU %OYG
DLQ 6
1RUWKZHVW W
%D\VKRUH
'U 9DOOH\ 'U
7XQQHO $YH 7XQQHO $YH
3DUN 3O 3DUN 3O
5G
&RXQW\
2OG &RXQW\ 5G
/Q 3DUN /Q
1 +LOO 'U1 +LOO 'U
0LVVLRQ %OXH 'U0LVVLRQ %OXH 'U
6DQ )UDQFLVFR $YH
%OYG %D\VKRUH %D\VKRUH%OYG
2/' 48$55<
5'
/,30$1
0,''/(
6&+22/
5G 5DGLR 5G
5G 5DGLR 5G
6DQ %HQLWR 5G
$YH
9LVLWDFLRQ9LVLWDFLRQ $YH
5G +XPEROGW +XPEROGW 5G
5G 3RLQW
6LHUUD 3RLQW 5G
$OYDUDGR 6W $OYDUDGR 6W
7ULQLW\ 5G7ULQLW\ 5G
'U
$UWKXU 'U
6RODQR 6W 6RODQR6
0RQWHUH\ 6W
6W &ODUD 6DQWD &ODUD 6W
0DULSRVD 6W0DULSRVD 6W
),57+ 3$5.
%5,6%$1(
(/(0(17$5<
6&+22/
GRFL R 6W
&HQWUDO
%ULVEDQH
%ULVEDQH
5G 5DGLR 5G
5G 5DGLR 5G
+DUQH\ :D\
/,77/(
+2//<:22'
3$5.
6KRUHOLQH 7UDLO
+DUQH\ :D\
$ODQQD :D\ $ODQQD:D\
%HDWW\ $YH
7XQQHO $YH7XQQHO $YH
$YH 7XQQHO $YH
/DJRRQ :D\
3NZ\ 3RLQW 6LHUUD 3RLQW 3NZ\
%OYG %D\VKRUH %D\VKRUH %OYG
+XPEROGW 5G+XPEROGW 5G
7XODUH 6W7XODUH 6W
/DNH 6W /DNH 6
5G
$QQLV 5G
3NZ\ 3RLQW 6LHUUD 3RLQW 3NZ\
%OYG %D\VKRUH %D\VKRUH%OYG
6RXWKHDVW
%D\VKRUH
\ $ -
6RXWKZHVW R
%D\VKRUH
5G 5DGLR 5G
6KRUHOLQH &W 6KRUHOLQH &W 6KRU
K

HOLQH &W
6KRUHOLQH &W
3NZ\
3RLQW
6LHUUD 3RLQW 3NZ\
%D\VKRUH %OYG %D\VKRUH %OYG
%D\ 7UDLO %D\ 7UDLO
%D\ 7UDLO
%D\ 7UDLO
6KRUHOLQH 7UDLO
$YH
-DPHVWRZQ-DPHVWRZQ $YH
%D\ 7UO
0DULQD %OYG
%D\ 7UO
6KRUHOLQH 6K O
UH H & &W 6KRUHOLQH &W
6LHUUD 3RLQW 3NZ\6LHUUD 3RLQW 3NZ\
0DULQD %OYG0DULQD %OYG
0DULQD %OYG 0DULQD %OYG
7&
7&
63&52
6&52
6&52
6&52
50+3
5%$
5
5
5
5
5
3'
3'
3$2=
3$2=
3$2=
26
26
26
26
26
1&52
1&52
0/%
0/%
0/%
0
+&
+&
&38
&
5782
6RXUFHV
(VUL7RP7RP*DUPLQ)$212$$86*6
F
2SHQ6WUHHW0DSFRQWULEXWRUVDQGWKH*,68VHU&RPPXQLW\ k
02/04/2026

BRISBANE'S ZONING DISTRICTS
Zoning Districts
C-1 Commercial Mixed-Use District
C/P-U Commercial/Public Utilities District
HC Heavy Commercial District
M-1 Manufacturing District
MLB Marsh Lagoon Bayfront District
NCRO-1 Brisbane Village Neighborhood Commercial District NCRO-2 Downtown Brisbane Neighborhood Commercial District O-S Open Space District
PAOZ-1 Parkside Overlay District - Clustered Housing
PAOZ-2 Parkside Overlay District - Multi-Family Housing PD Planned Development District
R-1 Residential District
R-2 Residential District
R-3 Residential District
R-BA Brisbane Acres Residential District
R-MHP Residential Mobile Home Park District
R-TUO Residential Two Unit Overlay District
SCRO-1 Southwest Bayshore Commercial District
SP-CRO Sierra Point Commercial District
TC-1 Crocker Park Trade Commercial District
TC-2 Southeast Bayshore Commercial District
) $
9 $
$
G
0HQGRFLQR 6W
\
S
6DQ )UDQFLV DQ )UDQFLVFR $YH
$YH
9LVLWD
FLR
Q
9LVLWDFLR
$YH
$OYDUDG $OYDUD
6ROD
Q
R
6W 6RODQR 6W
0RQWHUH\ 6W
0DULSRVD 6W0DULSRVD 6W
GRFL R 6W
&HQWUDO
%ULVEDQH
%ULVE
5
5 1&52
1&52

EXPANDED VIEW
ATTACHMENT 2

Page 235 of 273 ends

ATTACHMENT 3
DRAFT
1 ORDINANCE NO. XX

AN INTERIM URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BRISBANE

IMPOSING A MORATORIUM UPON
NEW RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IN THE NCRO-2 ZONING DISTRICT The City Council of the City of Brisbane hereby ordains as follows:

SECTION 1: Findings and Declaration of Intent.

The City of Brisbane finds and determines that:
(a) The NCRO-2 Neighborhood Commercial Downtown Brisbane zoning district, as shown on the portion of the City’s Zoning Map attached hereto and made part hereof, contains a mixture of commercial retail, office, and residential uses.
(b) It is the policy of the City, as reflected in the Brisbane General Plan, to maintain a range of local retail and service uses, including shops, restaurants, medical, professional and administrative offices and other uses of the same general character.
(c) Residential uses may be permitted by conditional use permit, but the primary goal in the General Plan and implementing zoning provisions is to further neighborhood serving commercial uses. (d) The NCRO-2 zoning currently provides for residential uses by conditional use permit only when part of a mixed-use and when located above or behind nonresidential uses. (e) State laws intended to address the statewide housing crisis have prioritized housing over commercial land uses and may limit the City’s authority to impose local zoning restrictions on mixed-use districts.
(f) Although the NCRO-2 zoning district is provided in the City’s adopted Housing Element, the district was not listed as having significant housing opportunity sites that are required for meeting the Housing Element goals.

(g) The locally serving shops and restaurants within the NCRO-2 district play a crucial role in the economic vitality and character of the City, providing a walkable environment to the surrounding Central Brisbane residential neighborhoods and public and private gathering places including dining, shopping and personal services, and should be maintained and enhanced, consistent with the intent of the General Plan.
(h) It is the intention of the City Council to study and review current zoning regulations for the NCRO2 District to determine whether new residential uses should be prohibited, to remove its mixed-use status, and designate existing residential uses and structures as legal nonconforming.

Page 236 of 273 ends

ATTACHMENT 3
DRAFT
2 (i) Unless a moratorium is adopted to prevent the development of new primary residential units within the NCRO-2 district, the City is at risk of new applications being submitted that would remove existing commercial space, or reduce it to be severely restricted; and loss of such spaces could likewise spread to result in the loss of other neighboring businesses. A current and immediate threat to the public health, safety, and welfare therefore exists which requires the imposition of a moratorium in order to preserve the status quo until further impact studies are conducted, if determined necessary, until further legislative action is accomplished.

SECTION 2: Purpose and Scope of Ordinance
This ordinance is enacted pursuant to Section 65858 of the California Government Code. The purpose of the Ordinance is to prohibit, for a period of forty-five (45) days, the acceptance of new entitlement applications for development of primary dwelling units or subdivision of existing primary dwelling units, whether new construction or conversion of existing commercial space. This ordinance shall not impede the development of accessory dwelling units or junior accessory dwelling units that are explicitly required to be approved by state law and consistent with the City’s ordinance Brisbane Municipal Code (BMC) Chapter 17.43 Accessory Dwelling Units and Junior Accessory Dwelling Units. It shall also not apply to active building permit applications or issued building permits.

SECTION 3: Definition.

As used in this Ordinance, the term “primary dwelling unit” is the same as defined in BMC Section

17.02.235.G, “’Primary dwelling unit’ or ‘main dwelling’ means a dwelling unit that is not an accessory dwelling unit or a junior accessory dwelling unit.”
SECTION 4: Prohibition
During the effective period of this Ordinance, no application for a building permit, housing development permit, design permit, use permit, or other form of permit or approval shall be accepted or processed, and no building permit, housing development permit, design permit, use permit or other form of permit or approval (except as may be required by State law) shall be issued or granted for the development of new primary dwelling units at any location within the NCRO-2 zoning district, as shown on the portion of the City’s Zoning Map attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.

The prohibition has the following exceptions:
i. Building permits may be processed and approved for a mixed-use project that are currently active as of the date of this ordinance or that received entitlement prior to the date of this ordinance through the granting of a use permit, design permit, or other State authorized entitlement, which permit or entitlement is maintained in an active state, i.e., not expired.

Page 237 of 273 ends

ATTACHMENT 3
DRAFT
3 ii. ADUs and JADUs may be granted by building permit, that are required by state law, are consistent with the City’s ordinance BMC 17.43 Accessory Dwelling Units and Junior Accessory Dwelling Units, and that would not require a design permit or use permit due to modification of existing commercial space.

SECTION 5: Effective Period of Ordinance.

This Ordinance shall be effective for a period of forty-five (45) days from the date of its adoption.

However, this Ordinance may be extended for additional periods of time in the manner provided in Section 65858 of the California Government Code.

SECTION 6: Severability.

If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance is for any reason held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The city Council of the City of Brisbane hereby declares that it would have passed this Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause and phrase thereof, irrespective of the fact that one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses and phrases may be held invalid or unconstitutional.

SECTION 7: Effective Date.

This Ordinance is an urgency ordinance for the immediate preservation of the public health, safety, and welfare and shall become effective immediately upon its passage and adoption. ____________________
Coleen Mackin, Mayor
The foregoing Ordinance was adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Brisbane held on the ___ day of _______________, 2026 by the following vote, which constitutes no less than a four-fifths (4/5ths) vote of the entire City Council, as required by 65858 of the California Government Code.

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________ _____________________________ Ingrid Padilla, City Clerk City Attorney

Page 238 of 273 ends

ATTACHMENT 3
DRAFT
4 CITY OF BRISBANE

CERTIFICATE OF POSTING

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )

COUNTY OF SAN MATEO )
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that during the course of a regular meeting on Thursday, ________________ the City Council of the City of Brisbane adopted Ordinance _____ entitled:

ORDINANCE NO.____

AN INTERIM URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BRISBANE

IMPOSING A MORATORIUM UPON
NEW RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IN THE NCRO-2 ZONING DISTRICT The undersigned, for and on behalf of the Brisbane City Clerk, caused a copy of this Ordinance to be posted in the following places in the City if Brisbane:

Brisbane City Hall Offices, 50 Park Place
Brisbane Community Center/Library, 250 Visitacion Avenue Mission Blue Park Tennis Court, 475 Mission Blue Drive
Dated_________________. Said posting was completed on ________________.

I declare under penalty of perjury the forgoing is true and correct. ________________
Ingrid Padilla
City Clerk

Page 239 of 273 ends

City Council Staff Report
Meeting Date: April 2, 2026
From: Maz Bozorginia, Public Works Director
Subject: Complete Streets Safety Committee 2025
Accomplishments & 2026 Work Plan
Recommendation
Staff recommend the Council receive the Complete Street Safety Committee’s (CSSC) 2025 Report of Accomplishments and adopt the 2026 CSSC Work Plan.

Background
At their regular January 2026 meeting, committee members discussed their desires for the 2026 CSSC Work Plan with city staff. A shortlist of potential work items additions was prepared in advance of a meeting with committee liaisons.

CSSC Council Liaisons Mayor Mackin and Councilmember Kern met with CSSC Chair Wirowek and Vice Chair Bouscal and city staff on February 10th, 2026. The group reviewed the status of the work items from 2025 and discussed the development of a CSSC 2025 Accomplishments report and the CSSC 2026 Work Plan.

Discussion
At their regular March meeting, committee members reviewed and finalized the 2026 Work Plan. The CSSC wishes to receive Council feedback and approval of their work plan.

Fiscal Impact
While this report does not authorize specific expenditures, individual items within the 2026 work plan may have associated costs. Fiscal impacts will be identified as projects are developed and will be presented to the City Council for approval through future actions or budget adjustments.

Attachments

1. 2025 CSSC Accomplishments

2. 2026 CSSC Work Plan
City Manager Approval

Page 240 of 273 ends

Jeremy Dennis, City
Manager
03/24/2026

Page 241 of 273 ends

2025 COMPLETE STREETS SAFETY COMMITTEE REPORT OF ACCOMPLISHMENTS In 2013, the City Council established the Complete Streets Safety Committee (CSSC) as an advisory body to recommend policies and programs related to safety and circulation of all modes of travel, including pedestrians, bicycles, and motorists. The Committee has worked with staff on a wide array of issues generally following an annual work plan. Below is a summary of the work staff and the Committee has undertaken during calendar year 2025.

Finalize investigation of potential for one-way streets - Mariposa and Monterey Steet between Visitacion Avenue and Solano Street – In December 2024, the CSSC and City Staff invited members of the public to attend a CSSC Meeting at the Brisbane Library. The purpose of the meeting was to have an open discussion regarding the community’s thoughts on the proposal and voice any concerns. Per the resident feedback, the CSSC and staff decided to not recommend the one-way street proposal at their February 2025 meeting.

Review and recommend improvements to address speeding and overall traffic safety issues on Visitacion Ave. incorporating community feedback – At their March 6, 2025, meeting, the City Council agendized a discussion regarding vehicular traffic flow and parking conditions along Visitacion Avenue to provide an opportunity for residents and business owners to express concerns. Following public comment and Council discussion, the matter was referred to the Complete Streets Safety Committee (CSSC) for further evaluation and development of recommendations. The CSSC discussed improvements to Visitacion Avenue at their April - June 2025 meetings and conducted surveys for residents and businesses on Visitacion Avenue. The final recommendation was ultimately postponed due to transitioning Public Works leadership.

Returning to the Visitacion Avenue discussion at their December 2025 meeting, the CSSC and staff prepared a list of potential improvements to address traffic issues on Visitacion Avenue. This list was presented to members of the public at the CSSC February 2026 meeting held at the Brisbane Library. Allowing residents to share their thoughts and opinions at a public meeting was essential for the CSSC to finalize their recommendation sent to City Council in April 2026.

Receive and comment on the Baylands Transportation Circulation plan and other proposals – Utilizing their experience as CSSC members and Brisbane residents, the CSSC reviewed the Circulation chapter of the Baylands Specific Plan and submitted a 24-page list of comments in December 2025.

Additionally, the CSSC provided a 16-page list of comments on the Baylands Draft Environmental Impact report.

Page 242 of 273 ends

Review feedback on Pilot Parking Program on Thomas Ave. before staff brings to Council - On April 18th, 2024, City Council reviewed neighbor feedback regarding a potential trial program on Tulare St. and/or Thomas Ave. via a returned letter sent to households and other feedback received from staff’s follow up door-knocking campaign. Based on the survey results, City Council agreed to a trial Residential Parking Permit Program (RPPP) on Thomas Avenue from November 2024 to April 2025.

Based on the survey results for the parking permit program, the CSSC and staff recommend terminating the program at their July 2025 meeting. Council agreed to terminate the program at the July 17th, 2025 meeting.
2025 Halloween Street Closure – Per resident requests and committee member interest, CSSC discussed a Halloween Street Closure in Central Brisbane at their August 2025 meeting. This was the first-ever Halloween Street Closure in Brisbane, and the CSSC was integral to planning, outreach, and recruitment of volunteers of the street closure, which was well received by residents
Additional Accomplishments - Letter of Support for the Cyle 3 Transportation Demand Management Grant, received a C/CAG & SMCTA Countywide Transportation Plan Presentation at the November 2025 CSSC meeting and provided comments, received a BDI Baylands Specific Plan Presentation at their October 2025 CSSC meeting and provided comments.

Page 243 of 273 ends

Page 244 of 273 ends

Complete Streets Safety Committee Draft 2026 Work Plan

1. Finalize the CSSC recommendation to address speeding and overall traffic safety issues on Visitacion Avenue and continue evaluating and recommending traffic‑safety improvements along Visitacion Avenue and San Bruno Avenue.

2. Through the Cycle 5 San Mateo County Office of Education School Travel Fellowship, evaluate and recommend safety improvements/plans for Brisbane Elementary School that advance the Safe Routes to School program goals.

3. Evaluate commercial truck circulation patterns and identify opportunities to improve freight mobility and safety

4. Conduct a citywide audit of sidewalk conditions and needs, crosswalk conditions, and tree-related sight obstructions

5. Conduct a citywide safety and infrastructure review of bicycle routes

6. Evaluate wayfinding signage for effectiveness and identify locations for additions, incorporating input from the Public Arts Advisory Committee

Page 245 of 273 ends

Page 246 of 273 ends

City Council Staff Report
Meeting Date: April 2, 2026
From: Maz Bozorginia, Public Works Director, Tomas Santoyo, Assistant Engineer
Subject: Complete Streets Safety Committee Recommendations for Visitacion Avenue Corridor Safety and Operations
Recommendation
Receive the Complete Streets Safety Committee (CSSC) recommendations for improvements to the Visitacion Avenue corridor and provide direction to staff regarding prioritization and next steps within the following categories:

1. Pedestrian Safety Improvements

2. Traffic Flow Modifications

3. Enforcement Strategies

4. Parking Supply and Management
Background
On March 6, 2025, the City Council agendized a discussion regarding vehicular traffic flow and parking conditions along Visitacion Avenue to provide an opportunity for residents and business owners to express concerns. Following public comment and Council discussion, the matter was referred to the Complete Streets Safety Committee (CSSC) for further evaluation and development of recommendations.

To better understand corridor conditions, staff conducted a public survey of residents and businesses along Visitacion Avenue and received approximately 130 responses. While the initial focus was on safety concerns, responses reflected a broader range of issues, including double parking, speeding, failure to stop at stop signs, illegal U-turns, and parking availability.Based on survey feedback and CSSC input, staff prepared an initial list of potential improvements and presented the list to the City Council on July 17, 2025. At that meeting, the Council requested that the CSSC refine the recommendations and return with additional detail regarding scope, cost, and implementation considerations.

On February 12, 2026, the CSSC held a special meeting at the Brisbane Library to once again engage the community, revisit the survey results, and review updated fiscal information associated with the proposed strategies. Approximately 30 community members attended. The purpose of the meeting was to confirm community priorities and refine elements of the recommendations before returning to the City Council. Following this additional outreach and committee deliberation, the CSSC organized the recommendations into functional categories

Page 247 of 273 ends

to support structured Council direction.

Discussion
Survey responses and committee deliberations identified four primary areas of concern along the Visitacion Avenue corridor. The recommendations span physical improvements, operational adjustments, and potential policy changes. Because these actions differ in scope, cost, and implementation complexity, they are presented below by category to assist the City Council in providing targeted direction.

1. Pedestrian Safety Improvements
This category focuses on measures intended to improve pedestrian visibility, crossing safety, and traffic calming along Visitacion Avenue. These improvements are primarily capital in nature and would require engineering review and construction. Estimated costs are per crossing or leg of an intersection. Proposed improvements include:
• Raised crosswalks (all four crosswalks should be raised at each selected intersection), estimated $15,000–$20,000 for AC. Replacing bricks would increase costs. • Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon (PHB) at intersections without existing stop signs on Visitacion Avenue, estimated to cost of $150,000–$200,000 • Curb extensions, estimated to cost $60,000
• Pedestrian-activated flashing beacons, estimated to cost at $20,000 per leg • CSSC also suggested high visibility crosswalks and improved signage, noted in the attached Summary Matrix.

Council direction is requested regarding prioritization of pedestrian safety improvements and whether staff should proceed with feasibility analysis, design development, and potential inclusion in the Capital Improvement Program.

2. Traffic Flow Modifications
This category includes operational improvements intended to improve circulation, increase compliance, and address congestion along Visitacion Avenue and adjacent streets. These measures are generally lower-cost and may be implemented administratively. Proposed improvements include:
• Installation of red curb segments to improve AB 413 compliance, minimal cost; volunteer-supported implementation (this item modification has been approved by City staff and coordination is currently underway)
• Establishment of loading zones on Mariposa Street and Mendocino Street, estimated cost $2,500–$3,000, recommended hours 6AM-8AM, 12PM-2PM per Visitacion Avenue Business Deliveries survey
• Designation of Transportation Network Company (TNC), delivery and pickup driver

Page 248 of 273 ends

parking spaces, estimated cost approximately $600, recommended hours lunch/dinner times, 12PM-2PM, 6PM-8PM
Council direction is requested regarding whether staff should proceed with these operational adjustments or return with a more detailed implementation plan.

3. Enforcement Strategies
This category addresses behavioral concerns raised in the survey, including double-parking, speeding, and stop sign compliance. These measures would involve coordination with the Brisbane Police Department and may require review by Legal Counsel. Proposed strategies include:
• Evaluation of potential increases to traffic violation fines (amount to be determined pending Police Department and legal review)
• Contracting a third-party parking enforcement officer to assist with enforcement of parking regulations (approximately $75,000/year)
Council direction is requested regarding whether to pursue further analysis and policy development related to enforcement measures.

4. Parking Supply and Management
This category addresses concerns related to parking availability along the corridor. Proposed improvements include:
• Conversion of the former Brisbane Teen Center site into a 12-space, 8AM – 8PM parking lot, preliminary cost estimate $25,000.

This action would represent a distinct capital project and may require additional analysis related to site feasibility, funding availability, and long-term use considerations.

Council direction is requested regarding whether staff should conduct further feasibility analysis of parking supply expansion options.

Fiscal Impact
The fiscal impact will depend on the scope and sequencing of improvements authorized by the City Council.

Preliminary cost estimates for pedestrian safety capital improvements range from approximately $15,000 to $200,000 per improvement, depending on the selected intervention.

Traffic flow modifications are generally low-cost operational changes. Enforcement strategies may involve policy review or contractual expenses. The proposed parking lot conversion has a

Page 249 of 273 ends

preliminary estimate of approximately $25,000.

Staff will return to the City Council with refined cost estimates, funding options, and implementation plans based on Council direction.

Attachments

1. Visitacion Corridor Improvement Options Summary

2. Visitacion Business Delivery Survey

3. Visitacion Resident Survey Summary

4. CSSC Visitaction Avenue PPT_2026.02.12
City Manager Approval
Jeremy Dennis, City
Manager
03/27/2026

Page 250 of 273 ends

VISITACION AVENUE POTENTIAL IMPROVEMENTS

1. PROPOSED PEDESTRIAN SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS COST ESTIMATE WORK DONE BY TIME TO IMPLEMENT DESCRIPTION OF POTENTIAL IMPROVEMENT CATEGORY SUPPORTING DATA REMARKS RAISED CROSSWALK (For all four crosswalks in one intersection) $15,000 - $20,000 per intersection leg Outside Contractor 3-4 months from approval Elevated crosswalks increase pedestrian visiblity within the driver's field of vision Pedestrian Safety "Rasied crosswalks can reduce pedestrian crashed by 45%" FHWA 2018 Cost varies based on material, crosswalk width,
street grade, and extent of professional
surveying required. Replacing bricks would
increase costs.

PEDESTRIAN HYBRID BEACON (HAWK) $150,000-$250,000 Outside Contractor 9-12 months from approval A stop-light style sign that stops traffic as pedestrians are crossing Pedestrian Safety/Traffic Flow FHWA evaluations of PHBs: (1) Pedestrian crash reductions of approximately 55% at treated locations, (2) Substantial reductions in severe and fatal pedestrian crashes, (3) higher driver compliance compared to RRFBs

CURB EXTENSIONS (BULB OUTS) WHERE THE SIDEWALK MEETS THE INTERSECTION $60,000 per intersection Outside Contractor 3-6 months from approval Extend the sidewalk at all intersections to
reduce the distance a pedestrian has to walk
and slow the turning vehicles.Could extend to
the end of the park car. Increase pedestrian
visibility and shorten the distance a
pedestrian has to cross a street
Pedestrian Safety Multiple FHWA-referenced studies show pedestrian crash reductions in the range of ~20–40% at intersections with curb extensions, depending on context.

PEDESTRIAN ACTIVATED FLASHING BEACONS (RRFB) $20,000 per intersection leg Outside Contractor 6-9 months from approval Rectangular flashing LED lights in the street
to signal to a driver a pedestrian is crossing.

Increase pedestrian visibility and shorten the
distance a pedestrian has to cross a street
Pedestrian Safety/Traffic Flow
FHWA-cited studies (including multi-city evaluations) findings: (1) yielding rates increasing from ~20–30% to 70–90%+ after RRFB installation, (2) biggest gains occur at mid-block and uncontrolled crossings
LADDER MARKING INSTEAD OF TWO WHITE LINES FOR CROSSWALKS $2,000 Outside Contractor 2-3 months from approval Increase pedestrian visibility and shorten the distance a pedestrian has to cross a street Pedestrian Safety Crosswalk visibility enhancements, such as lighting and enhanced signage and markings, help drivers detect pedestrians and reduce pedestrian crashes 23 to 48 percent. FHWA (2019) This does create increased maintenace cost over time given the increase in theromplastic paint IMPROVED SIGNAGE $500 Brisbane Staff and/or Contractor Varies depending on scope & scale In-street signing, such as ”STOP Here for
Pedestrians“ or ”YIELD Here to Pedestrians“
may be appropriate since the speed limits are
less than 30 miles per hour.

Pedestrian Safety/Traffic Flow
25% of travel occurs at night, but nightime crashes account for 50% of crashed. Improved signage can singificant improve night time visibility. NHTSA Fatal Accident Reporting System (2010)

2. PROPOSED TRAFFIC FLOW MODIFICATIONS COST ESTIMATE WORK DONE BY TIME TO IMPLEMENT DESCRIPTION OF POTENTIAL IMPROVEMENT CATEGORY SUPPORTING DATA REMARKS RED CURBS $510 per location (20 LF) Brisbane Staff and/or Contractor 2-3 months from approval Increased compliance with AB413 "daylighting" law Enforcement/Pedestrian Safety No formal data, although anecdotally residents have expressed that red curbs are the most clear indicators of parking resitrctions Cost is based on a previous quote for red curb painting, in house or contracted work TBD LOADING ZONE ON MENDOCINO STREET AND MARIPOSA STREET $2,500 - $3,000 per location Brisbane Staff and/or Contractor 2-4 weeks from approval Desingated loading zones for delivery drivers
help reduce double parking, traffic
congestion, and improve the overall flow of
traffic, per Visitacion Avenue business
survey hours could be 6AM-8AM, 12PM2PM
Traffic Flow "Loading zones are flexible spaces that increase turnover and reduce double parking up to 70 percent." NYC DOT 2024 Cost varies based on extent of striping/signage desired TNC/DELIVERY DRIVER PICK UP $600 per location Brisbane Staff and/or Contractor 2-3 months from approval Designated loading zones for delivery drivers
help reduce double parking, traffic
congestion, and improve the overall flow of
traffic during lunch and dinners hours (12PM2PM , 6PM-8PM) Traffic Flow
"Incidents of double parking and illegal U-turns decreased by an estimated 64% in immediate proximity to the curbFlow pick up/drop off zones."
"On-demand delivery (e.g. online food delivery services), freight and parcel deliveries lasted an average of 7-11 minutes, while rideshare and taxi pick up/drop off activity lasted less than two and a half minutes on average." DDOT (2019)
Cost is based on previous quotes for installation
of new signs and metal poles. Locations to be
determined pending feedback from businesses
and TNC's

3. PROPOSED ENFORCEMENT STRATEGIES COST ESTIMATE WORK DONE BY TIME TO IMPLEMENT DESCRIPTION OF POTENTIAL IMPROVEMENT CATEGORY SUPPORTING DATA REMARKS INCREASE FINES FOR DOUBLE PARKING VIOLATIONS No Cost Brisbane Staff 3-6 months from approval Reduce the number of parking violations by increasing penalties for violations Enforcement "A study across several Swiss cities that doubled fines for traffic and parking violations found illegal parking violations decreased (up to ~32% reduction) when enforcement activity was held constant, suggesting that severity of the penalty can influence compliance — though the authors caution that causal inference is limited due to study design" Goldenbeld (2017) https://www.researchgate.net/publication/322790828_Increasing_traffic_fines Current penalty is $40. Increase amount is TBD,
pending Police and Legal review
CONTRACT THIRD PARTY ENFORCEMENT OFFICER $75,000 per year Contract enforcement officer Reduce parking violations Enforcement

4. PROPOSED PARKING SUPPLY AND MANAGEMENT IMPROVEMENTS COST ESTIMATE WORK DONE BY TIME TO IMPLEMENT DESCRIPTION OF POTENTIAL IMPROVEMENT CATEGORY SUPPORTING DATA REMARKS BRISBANE FORMER TEEN CENTER CONVERSION TO PARKING LOT $25,000 Outside Contractor 3-4 months from approval Additional public parking, 12 parking spots Parking N/A Conversion of the Brisbane Teen Center to a
parking lot is dependent on previously discussed
housing development at this location. General
site clean-up can be completed in the interim by
City staff when time allows.

Attachment 1

Page 251 of 273 ends

BUSINESS ADDRESS REVIECES DELIVERIES DELIVERY DAY(S) AVG. DELIVERY TIME NOTES 1 Brisbane Hardware 1 Visitacion Ave. Yes Thursdays 6:00 AM Deliveries are from ACE and take place on San Bruno or in their lot off Visitacion 2 Mama Mia 35 Visitacion Ave. Yes Thursday & Friday 1:00 PM Peak times 11-1 PM and 5-7 PM, customers sometimes double park 3 Julie's Deli 45 Visitacion Ave. Yes Varies Varies Peak times 11-1:30 PM, sometimes 30-minute wait 4 The Burrow 109 Visitacion Ave. Yes Thursdays 2:00 PM Peak times 12-2 PM, 3-5 PM, likes idea of an Uber/pick-up spot 5 Melissa's Taqueria 160 Visitacion Ave. Yes M/W/Th 7:00 AM Coca-Cola truck comes 1x/month on Mondays at
7:30 AM, peak times 9-1 PM, metered parking
desired
6 Eagles Hall 185 Visitacion Ave. Yes Thursday & Friday Varies Deliveries happen in their parking strip area7 Madhouse Coffee 402 Visitacion Ave. Yes Monday & Thursday 7:00 AM Small box truck uses parking strip area8 Midtown Market 249 Visitacion Ave. Yes Mondays 7:00 AM Beer delivered Thursdays (parking lot), McLane
truck comes Weds. 2 PM, peak times 8-9 AM, 6-9
PM
9 Brisbane Inn 50 Visitacion Ave. Yes M/T/W 12 -2PM Occasional deliveries at 6:30 PM for events. Trucks park on side street 10 Lucky House 148 Visitacion Ave. No N/A N/A Peak times 11-1 PM, no observed problems with customer parking 11 Lyrical Opposition 132 Visitacion Ave. No N/A N/A
Parking is available for after-hours events, thinks
residents may be using spaces on Visitacion to
park
12 Brisbane Chiropractic 101 Visitacion Ave. No N/A N/A With reduced street parking, customers have trouble finding parking Visitacion Avenue Business Delivery Survey Attachment 2

Page 252 of 273 ends

Visitacion Ave. Issues Survey
Project: Information-Gathering Phase
Period: April 7, 2025 - April 28, 2025
Project manager: Caroline Cheung
Report summary
The online survey was launched on April 7, 2025 with City representatives from Communications and Economic Development visiting businesses and residents on Visitacion Ave. April 10, 15, and 16. The survey was promoted on the City's signboards, social media, website, and the Residents of Brisbane Facebook page. Brisbane residents also shared the survey via email distribution lists such as the Mothers of Brisbane. Hard copy surveys were made available at the Brisbane Library, the Senior Sunrise Room, and City Hall.

Flyers announcing the survey with a QR code were also posted on the community bullentin boards in town. Communications staff tabled at the Thursday Farmers' Market on April 17 and 24.

Survey results
A total of 130 individuals completed the survey, 113 electronically, and 17 via hardcopy. See the results of the survey in summary form below.

Please tell us your relationship with Visitacion Ave.
129/130 - Multiple choice - choose many - required
I visit Visitacion 85% (113 choices)
I live on Visitacion 9.8% (13 choices)
I work on Visitacion 4.5% (6 choices)
No answer 0.8% (1 choice)
Attachment 3

Page 253 of 273 ends

Question 2: What are the most concerning traffic issues you're seeing on Visitacion Ave. and what days of the week and time of day are you generally observing each issue (i.e 8-10 AM, lunchtime, etc., weekdays, weekends, both, on a specific day of the week)? Please be as specific as possible.

Double parking is the most frequently mentioned issue, particularly by delivery vehicles, rideshare drivers, and restaurant patrons. This occurs throughout the day but is most common during lunchtime and early evening on weekdays.

Speeding and failure to stop at stop signs are also major concerns, with many respondents noting these behaviors occur at all times of day and week. These issues are particularly dangerous for pedestrians, who report near misses in crosswalks due to inattentive or reckless drivers.

Illegal U-turns across double yellow lines and in intersections are frequently cited as problematic, causing confusion and safety risks for other drivers and pedestrians. This behavior is noted throughout the day and week.

Parking availability is a recurring issue, with respondents highlighting the lack of spaces due to long-term parked vehicles and the removal of spots for daylighting laws. Many suggest adding more parking or enforcing time limits.

Pedestrian safety is a significant concern, especially at intersections where visibility is obstructed by parked cars or where drivers fail to yield. The intersections of Visitacion & Monterey and Visitacion & San Bruno are frequently mentioned as problematic.

Some respondents suggest adding stop signs at all intersections on Visitacion to improve traffic flow and pedestrian safety. Others propose stricter enforcement of parking rules and traffic violations.

A minority of respondents report no significant traffic issues or express satisfaction with current conditions.

Questions 3: If you're a business and get deliveries, which day(s) and time(s) do those occur? Also, if you offer take-out, when are residents and food delivery drivers like Uber Eats and DoorDash doing pick ups from your establishment most often (i.e. lunchtime, dinner, or both)? Please be as specific as you can and note hours of day and days of the week if possible.

Page 254 of 273 ends

Most respondents did not provide specific information about business deliveries or take-out operations, often indicating they were not business owners or that the question was not applicable to them. Among those who did respond with relevant details, the following trends emerged:
- Deliveries typically occur during daytime hours, with some specifying between 11 AM and 4 PM.
- Take-out and food delivery pickups are most common during dinner hours, though some establishments also see activity at lunchtime.
- One respondent noted issues with parking enforcement affecting delivery and customer pickups.
- A few respondents mentioned specific businesses where take-out is popular, such as Lucky House, Julie's, Melissa's, and NaNa's.

Overall, the majority of responses were either "N/A" or unrelated to the question.

Question 4: Do you have any other comments you'd like to share with the Complete Streets Safety Committee?
Respondents frequently raised concerns about pedestrian safety, particularly on Visitacion Avenue and nearby streets. Some suggested adding stop signs at intersections and improving visibility by addressing issues like parked cars blocking sightlines. Speeding vehicles were also a recurring concern, with some respondents emphasizing the need for better enforcement or traffic calming measures.

Parking issues were another prominent theme. Several respondents criticized the implementation of California's "Daylighting Law," arguing that it unnecessarily reduces parking availability. Others suggested solutions like creating smaller parking spaces adding handicap spaces or enforcing time-limited parking.

Some respondents expressed frustration with temporary or "half-measure" safety solutions like crossing flags and pylons, calling them ineffective and advocating for more permanent infrastructure changes. Others highlighted the need for better lighting in key areas to improve safety during evening hours.

A few respondents emphasized the importance of balancing safety improvements with maintaining the town's character. For example, one respondent opposed speed bumps and suggested focusing on visibility improvements instead. Another expressed concern about prioritizing parking over creating vibrant community spaces on Visitacion Avenue.

Overall, the key themes were pedestrian safety, parking challenges, and the need for thoughtful, context-sensitive solutions.

Page 255 of 273 ends

Visitacion
Avenue –
Potential
Improvements

COMPLETE STREETS SAFETY

COMMITTEE (CSSC)
FEBRUARY 12, 2026
Attachment 3

Page 256 of 273 ends

Background
At Mayor Cliff Lentz’s request, a
discussion on vehicular traffic
and parking was agendized for
the March 6th, 2025 City Council
meeting
Upon City Council Discussion,
the item was recommended to
the CSSC for further review
At the March 12th, 2025
CSSC/Council Liaison meeting,
the CSSC was directed to
prioritize Visitacion Avenue
Improvements for their 2025
Work Plan

Page 257 of 273 ends

Background
(cont.)
In April 2025, staff conducted a
public survey of businesses and
residents on Visitacion Avenue,
collecting 130 responses
The most frequently expressed
concerns from members of the
public were double parking,
speeding, failure to stop at stop
signs, illegal U-turns, and lack of
parking
Staff identified 4 main
categories for improvements:
pedestrian safety, traffic flow,
enforcement, and parking

Page 258 of 273 ends

Categories of
Potential Traffic
Measures
The City has identified
various traffic measure
improvements that can be
organized into the following
categories:
- Pedestrian Safety
- Traffic Flow
- Parking
- Enforcement

Page 259 of 273 ends

Pedestrian Safety –
Raised Crosswalks
Locations for implementation along Visitacion
Avenue include the Visitacion
Avenue/Mariposa Street intersection and the
Visitacion Avenue/Mendocino Street
Intersection
- Elevated crosswalks increase pedestrian
visibility within the driver's field of vision
- Cost estimate: $15,000 - $20,000 per
crosswalk
- Timeline: 12 weeks for implementation upon
council approval
- Raised crosswalks can reduce pedestrian
crashes by 45% (FHWA 2018)

Page 260 of 273 ends

Traffic Flow –
Loading Zones
Designated loading zones for delivery drivers
to help reduce double parking, traffic
congestion, and improve the overall flow of
traffic, per Visitacion Avenue business survey
hours could be 6AM-7AM, 12PM-1PM
- Locations for implementation include
Mariposa Street approaching Visitacion
Avenue (80’) and Mendocino Street
approaching Visitacion Avenue (65’)
- Cost estimate: $2,500 - $3,000 per location
- Timeline: 4 weeks for implementation upon
council approval
- Loading zones are flexible spaces that
increase turnover and reduce double parking
up to 70 percent (NYC DOT 2024)

Page 261 of 273 ends

Traffic Flow –
TNC/Delivery Driver
Parking Spots
Designated temporary parking spots
for delivery drivers to help reduce
double parking, traffic congestion, and
improve the overall flow of traffic
during lunch and dinners hours (12PM- 1PM , 6PM-7PM)
- Locations for implementation include
Visitacion Avenue approaching
Monterey Street SB and Visitacion
Avenue approaching Mariposa Street
NB
- Cost estimate: $600 per location
- Timeline: 3 weeks for implementation
upon council approval

Page 262 of 273 ends

Parking – Converting the
Former Brisbane Teen
Center into a Parking Lot
Convert the vacant Brisbane Teen
Center lot into a public parking lot. The
goal is to address Visitacion Avenue
parking availability concerns expressed
in the public survey.
- Cost estimate: $30,000 per location
- Conversion of the Brisbane Teen
Center to a parking lot is dependent on
previously discussed housing
development at this location
- Timeline: 8 weeks for implementation
upon council approval

Page 263 of 273 ends

Enforcement – Increased
Traffic Fines and Painted
Red Curbs
Increased Traffic Fines - Current penalty is for
traffic infractions on Visitacion Avenue $100
for the first violation, $200 for the second
violation
- The goal is to further discourage traffic
violations by doubling the ticket fines
Red Curbs – The goal is to increase compliance
with AB413 "daylighting" law
- Cost estimate: $510 per location (20 LF)
Timeline: 5 weeks for implementation upon
council approval

Page 264 of 273 ends

THANK YOU!
QUESTIONS?
[email protected]
[email protected]

Page 265 of 273 ends

City Council Staff Report
Meeting Date: April 2, 2026
From: Jeremy Dennis, City Manager
Subject: Consider Adoption of Fiscal Year 2026-2027 Council Priorities
Recommendation
Staff recommend that the City Council adopt and approve FY 2026/277 City Council Priorities as discussed at the Priority Setting Session of March 21, 2026.

Background
City Council convened its second annual Priority Setting Study Session on Saturday, March 21, 2026, at the Doubletree Hotel in Brisbane. The goal of the Priority Setting Study Session was to provide staff direction on what projects to consider supporting its goals, to help the public understand the Council’s direction, and to help the City focus limited resources on the highest need(s).

Last year’s Priority Setting Session identified three goals including: 1. Maintain the fiscal health of the City, 2. Increase the maintenance for existing City facilities and infrastructure to determine long-term use opportunities, and 3. Create a comprehensive volunteerism initiative.

Both the fiscal health and the city facilities goals are long-term, ongoing goals. The creation of a comprehensive volunteerism initiative known as Brisbane Cares has been implemented.

Discussion
In preparation for FY 26-27 Council Priorities, the Council provided the City Manager with suggested priorities including:
• Additional Council meeting engagements
• Affordable Housing Funds Use
• Baylands Project completion
• Bank of America building — next steps
• Community Center remodel
• Continued Fiscal Transparency, Oversight, Literacy and Reporting • Economic Vitality – continuing and expanding
• Facilities (10-year plan for regular maintenance in the budget) • Infrastructure (5-year plan for tackling CIP, water, sewer) • IT Upgrade (create 5-year conversion plan)
• Marina – planning for the future
• Planning (Teen Center lot, Community Center use, Mission Blue expansion)

Page 266 of 273 ends

• Re-Forestation (develop a plan for tree planting on city-owned public property) • Sea Level Rise (identify areas in Central Brisbane for potential flood threat) • Visitation Avenue visioning
• Water Reclamation, long-term
• Water/Sewer (investigate alternative water sources, sewer treatment) • Wildfire (examine strategies to abate fire at wile/urban interface, prioritize tree removal based on imminent hazard, initiate more aggressive resident education on evacuation) Staff heard common themes around:

1. Fiscal Health

2. Facilities

3. Housing

4. Economic Vitality
For each theme, several initiatives were proposed to accomplish these goals. Staff requests the Council review the matrix of Goals and Initiatives below. Priority and term were determined based on feedback and consensus received at the Council’s Priority Setting Session.

The term is designated as follows:
• Short 1-2 years
• Medium 2-4years
• Long 5+ years
• Ongoing Continuous effort not tied to timeline
Foundational Goal: Maintain
Fiscal Health of the City
Initiative/Strategy Priority Term
Continue to maximize
appropriate revenue streams
by examining all forms, and
reviewing potential future

HIGH ONGOING

Page 267 of 273 ends

revenue opportunities
Review diversification of
businesses

HIGH ONGOING
Expend additional funds for
necessary expenditures
(e.g. pension liability)

HIGH ONGOING
Invest in Facilities
Initiative/Strategy Priority Term
Mission Blue Improvements and
Upgrades

HIGH SHORT
Community Center Remodel HIGH SHORT
Update CIP inventory and
expenditure plan

HIGH SHORT
Long Term Marina strategy HIGH SHORT
Goal: Invest in Affordable
Housing
Initiative/Strategy Priority Term
Implementation of
affordable housing programs
such as a First Time
Homebuyers program

HIGH SHORT
Use of affordable housing
projects for specific projects

HIGH ONGOING
Baylands Entitlement
Process Completed

HIGH SHORT
Goal: Economic Vitality
Initiative/Strategy Priority Term
Visitation Avenue
Revisioning

HIGH SHORT
Future of Crocker Park MEDIUM MEDIUM
Focus on diversification of
businesses and business
retention

HIGH ONGOING
The City Council also directed the Parkside 2 Subcommittee to provide its initial recommendations by the end of June 2026. Staff will also address the ratings of those bonds affected by recent audit work in the same timeframe.

Page 268 of 273 ends

Fiscal Impact
The fiscal impact is unknown at this time and varies dependent upon which projects are implemented.

Attachments
None
City Manager Approval
Jeremy Dennis, City
Manager
03/27/2026

Page 269 of 273 ends

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
Meeting Date: April 2, 2026
From: Ingrid Padilla, City Clerk and Jeremy Dennis, City Manager Subject: Recruitment Update on City Committees
Recommendation
Staff recommend scheduling interviews with applicants to fill vacancies in the Open Space & Ecology Committee (OSEC), Inclusion, Diversity, Equity & Accountability (IDEA) Committee, Complete Streets Safety Committee (CSSC), and Public Art Advisory Committee (PAAC).

Background
December 2025- February 18, 2026, was the recruitment period to fill 1 open seat in OSEC with a term ending in January 2030. The City Clerk’s Office received 3 applications.

December 2025-April 1st, 2026, was the recruitment period to fill up to 3 open seats in the Complete Streets Safety Committee with terms ending in January 2030. At the time this staff report was written, the City Clerk’s Office received 1 application.

With the resignation letter of IDEA Committee Member Maria Marc in January, the Council began recruitment on February 17, 2026 for a new IDEA Committee Member to fill 1 vacancy for the remaining portion of former Committee Member Marc’s term which expires in January 2027. At the time this staff report was written, the City Clerk’s Office received 1 application.

Lastly, after the approval of the amended Public Arts implementation Guidelines on March 5th, 2026, staff began the recruitment for 4 new members to the Public Art Advisory Committee (PAAC) with shortened terms ending January of 2028 in order to keep the recruitment schedule consistent. The 3 current members of PAAC have terms that are up in January 2027.

At the time this staff report was written, the City Clerk’s Office received 4 applications.

Discussion
Staff is proposing to schedule interviews in April 2026 with the goal of appointing and swearing in new committee members by May 7th, 2026. Staff is also seeking direction from council if there is a need to continue recruitment and increase the applicant pool.

Fiscal Impact
None
__________________
Jeremy Dennis, City Manager

Page 270 of 273 ends

CITY of BRISBANE
Council Subcommittee Update
From March 16th, 2026, to March 27th, 2026

1. Report Out on Subcommittees/Committees
A. Planning Issues Subcommittee 3/16 Kern, Mackin
The subcommittee discussed a potential urgency ordinance prohibiting new residential development (moratorium) in the NCRO-2 District, Brisbane’s downtown Neighborhood Commercial District. During the moratorium, staff would study the impacts residential development has in this District and provide direction to staff.

Recent state laws have had the effect of prioritizing housing over local serving commercial uses and effectively limit the City’s control over housing development and ultimately may serve to supplant the local serving commercial uses. To that end, a developer is applying for a preliminary housing development permit under SB 330 with no commercial space.

With this application, the applicant has raised challenges to the City’s authority to require that a development be mixed-use in this District, contending that a Density Bonus Law concession, under Government Code §65915(d) and (e), may be used to circumvent the General Plan and the implementing zoning provisions about uses. While the City’s legal counsel has indicated that Density Bonus Law may not be used to circumvent land uses, but are intended to address development standards, this application raises concerns and broader questions about the future of the City’s downtown commercial district.

Following discussion, the subcommittee recommended that the moratorium be agendized for council discussion. If approved by a four-fifths vote, staff will work with the Planning Commission and Subcommittee over the next 45 days to further evaluate the issue. If additional time is needed, the Council may extend the moratorium for up to 10 months and 15 days with a four-fifths vote of the Council. Thereafter, the interim ordinance may be extended for an additional year with a subsequent four-fifths vote.

Next Steps #1: This will be brought to council in April for discussion and provide direction to staff.

To view the agenda and packet online, please visit:
https://brisbaneca.portal.civicclerk.com/event/5751/files/agenda/7139 B. Public Art Advisory Committee 3/16 Davis, O’Connell
The committee received an update on the Alvarado to San Benito Stairway project. As the project comes to completion in mid-April, the committee would like to set the Ribbon-Cutting to Saturday April 25th at 10am on Alvarado Street.

Next Steps #1: Staff will confirm with Council and the artists that the date will work for them.

Page 271 of 273 ends

The committee reviewed the public outreach approach and timeline for community voting on the Artful Bench selection. To ensure fairness, the voting platform will limit participation to one vote per email address or device. To maximize awareness and encourage participation, staff will implement a comprehensive outreach campaign that includes promotion through the City Manager’s eBlast and the City’s social media channels, including Facebook and Instagram. Printed flyers with a QR code linking directly to the voting page will be distributed throughout the community at locations such as the Harbormasters Office, Community Center, Mission Blue, Library, Pool, City Hall, local businesses, and public facilities. Staff will also conduct direct outreach by sharing information through City programs (e.g. childcare), distributing the voting link through program distribution lists (e.g., lap swim participants), informing senior lunch participants, encouraging front-line staff to notify customers about the opportunity to vote, and including the voting link in Parks and Recreation staff email signatures.

Voting is open for two and a half weeks from March 25th to April 12, 2026.

Next Steps #1: The committee will review the results from the public at their next meeting on April 20th and make a recommendation to council.

To view the agenda and packet online, please visit:
https://brisbaneca.portal.civicclerk.com/event/5752/files/agenda/7141 C. Housing Subcommittee 3/17 Davis, Kern (alt.)
The subcommittee discussed a new 55-year ground lease and management agreement for Visitacion Garden senior apartments with Housing Endowment and Regional Trust of San Mateo County (HEART).

HEART gave a presentation on their findings and assessment of the property and clarified questions for the subcommittee on their proposal.

The subcommittee went into closed session with staff to discuss the acquisition.

Next Steps #1: The agreement with HEART is anticipated for Council consideration in April.

To view the agenda and packet online, please visit:
https://brisbaneca.portal.civicclerk.com/event/5765/files/agenda/7151 D. Housing Subcommittee 3/17 Davis, Lentz
The subcommittee met with HEART to hear the presentation on pending anti-displacement and tenant protection ordinances. Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) adopted a Transit-Oriented Communities (TOC) Policy and it applies to Brisbane due to the Bayshore Caltrain station. The TOC Policy areas span several different categories related to housing and circulation. Consistence with the TOC Policy is voluntary for jurisdictions that want to be eligible and/or competitive for MTC discretionary funding under the One Bay Area Grant (OBAG) program. In June 2025 the City Council adopted a Resolution to receive approximately $10,000 in MTC TOC Policy grant funds to cover the cost of calibrating the recently adopted inclusionary housing in-lieu fees.

Staff have recommended pursuing the following TOC policies, which largely overlap with the City’s existing zoning ordinance, or in the case of new regulations, with goals and policies in the AHSP and the Housing Element:

Page 272 of 273 ends

• Preservation Policy 4: Condo Conversion (the process by which a multifamily rental property is converted to a for-sale condominium development) – minor adjustments to include a requirement for a Tenant Relocation Assistance Plan, Rental Replacement Plan, or the tenant first right to purchase. • Preservation Policy 7: Mobile Home Preservation (requires cities to protect existing mobile home parks by adopting mobile home park zoning ordinances) - minor adjustments to address tenant relocation assistance.
• Protection Policy 1: Just Cause Eviction (protect tenants from eviction without cause) - the City’s just cause eviction ordinance would need to comply with the provisions of existing State law (AB 1482, 2019) which establishes baseline just cause eviction criteria and procedures and include measures that expand the provisions.
• Protection Policy 8: Tenant Relocation Assistance (requires landlords to make relocation payments for evictions) - An ordinance implementing this policy must provide: relocation payments for all nocause and no-fault evictions; assistance to lower-income tenants (those at 80% of AMI or less) and/or lower- and moderate-income tenants (those at 120% of AMI or less); the amount of relocation assistance must be equal to at least three months’ fair market rent. • Protection Policy 11: Tenant Anti-Harassment Protections (prevent a landlord from using force, willful threats, or menacing conduct to informally evict tenants) – The City will need to implement an ordinance that clarifies the following: define harassing behaviors; state that the city attorney as well as the impacted tenant may bring a civil action or request an injunction in response to harassment; establish penalties for landlords found to be in violation; establish noticing requirements for landlords to provide each tenant with an information sheet outlining anti-harassment protections and any other tenant protections in the jurisdiction.

Subcommittee made some suggestions to meet the criteria.

Next steps #1: Staff will bring this to council in the Fall To view the agenda and packet online, please visit:
https://brisbaneca.portal.civicclerk.com/event/5766/files/agenda/7149

2. Upcoming Subcommittees:

Sea Level Rise Subcommittee 3/30 3:00pm Lentz, Mackin
Receive update from consultants
Fiscal Policies Subcommittee 3/30 4:30pm Mackin, O’Connell Final review Business license fee study
before it goes to Council
Quarry Subcommittee 4/6 3:30pm Lentz, O’Connell
Review Regulatory requirements for
closing/reclaiming the Guadalupe Quarry
Public Art Advisory Committee 4/20 5:15pm Davis, O’Connell Review of the Public’s preferences on
Artful Bench Project

3. Proposed Subcommittees:

Does any councilmember wish to propose any items for a subcommittee to discuss?

Page 273 of 273 ends

Brisbane City CouncilApril 2, 2026

Brisbane City Council
April 2, 2026