Buena Park City Council
November 12, 2024

ATTEST:
_______________________________
City Clerk
I, Adria M. Jimenez, City Clerk of the City of Buena Park, California, hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly and regularly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Buena Park, held this 12 th day of November 2024.
______________________________________
City Clerk
City of Buena Park Schedule I
M2 Expenditure Report
Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2024
Beginning and Ending Balances
Description
Line
No.

Amount Interest
Balances at Beginning of Fiscal Year
A-M Freeway Projects
0 Regional Capacity Program (RCP) -
P ,Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program (RTSSP) Q Local Fair Share
R ' High Frequency Metrolink Service
S 'Transit Exten'sions ro Metrol'ink " "
:Convert Metrolink'Station(s) to Regional Gateways that T 'connectOra.nBeCounty with.High-Speed R.ailSystems
:Senior Mobility Program or Senior Non-Emergency Medical u
',Program
V :CommunityBasedTransit/Circulators
W 'SafeTransitStops
X :Environmental Cleanup Program (Water Quality)
.Other*
:?."-:'J}-aa'aa-'-Va:
q{- -'-'-'----"----"------
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
g
10 11
12 s
i "'
!i'
S .p,gffizr,ggzr.sy
S"
S
S
S 59,089.22
-S
S
i
S
S
S
S
S"
S' -
S
S
S
S
s
S
S
Balances at Beginning of Fiscal Year
. Monies Made Available During Fiscal Year
13 14
S 2,443,483.79
S 1,867,858.90
S
S 65,747
Total Monies Available (Sum Lines 13 & 14)
'Expenditures During Fiscal Year "
15 16
S 4,311,342.69
!> 922,547.19
'> 65,747
S', 65747
Balances at End of Fiscal Year
A-M, Freeway Projects
0 IRegionalCapacityProgram(RCP) -
P '.Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program (RTSSP) Q- ',Local Fair Share "
R : High Frequency Metrolink Service
S Transit Extensions to Metrolink
'Convert Metrolink Station(s) to Regional Gateways that T
iconnect Orange County with High-Speed RailSystems
iSenior Mobility Program or Senior Non-Emergency Medical U.
:Program
V :Community BasedTransit/Circulators '
W iSafeTransitStops '
X 'Environmental Cleanup Program (Water Quality)
' Other*
141'@p...-.-*+- -t.l :.6, - - '
l'
t
ss"'-';a,.,"""'y',':M'fliafl"Or:',",;,'l'(
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
!'
" S
!>
S i,iag,sg's.ja
S " "
s
S
S 39,099.56
S'
S
S
S'-
s
S'
S'
'S
S
!i'
S
S
S
S
S
!>
* Please provide a specific description
City of Buena Park M2 Expenditure Report
Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2024
Sources and Uses
Schedule 2
Description
Line
No.

Amount Interest
Revenues:
7iffl'tlz++-os
!' h_*_*;iasigxy_<l
'mj-#a'r.b:" mcbi(:)*qa.i3at%'s
x.aa_a:J'iswia 'iiia:sta'i'gs%
Am %0 +s:at._-O'.ii_-.m.am.tanJy_&-
A-Mi Freeway Projects
'O iR'egional Capacity Program-(RCP)
P : Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program (RTSSP) Q iLocalFairShare -- -
R" ',Hig'h Frequency Metr:ol!nk Service
S :Transit Extensions to Metrolink
- IConvertMetrolinkStat!on(s)toRegionalGatewaysthatconnect T
iOrange County with High-SpeedRailSystems
U 'Senior Mobility Program or Senior Non-Emergency Medical Program V iCommunity BasedTransit/6rcu'lators -
W Safe Transit Stops
X '.Environmental Cleanup Program (Water Quality)
(Other*
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
S
'S
S'
S 1,779,238
S
S
S
'§ 88,621
S
s
S
S-'
S
S"
S
S 64,572.38
S'
S
S
S 1,17jl.31
S
S'
S
S'
TOTAL REVENUES (Sum lines I to 12) 13 ', 1,867,859 S 65,746.69 Expenditures:
:AfM}FreewayProjects " "
0 IRegional Capacity Program (RCP)
P Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program (RTSSP) Q ',Local Fair Share
' R 'l High Frequency Met'rolink Service '
S Jransit Extensions to Metrolink
iConvert Metrolink Station(s) to RegionalGateways that connect T 10range County with High-Speed Rail Systems
U ' : Senior Mobility Program 'or Senior Non-Emergency Medical' Program V iCommunity BasedTransit/Circulators
W ISafeTransitStops "
X" ,Envir6nmentalCleanupProgram-(WaterQuality) "
iOther*
L_ .*z_niffi.i':i
14 15
16 17
18 19
20 21
22 23
24 25
7Xa"eri 'l(i,yak .__-z.,.yl, __!
S
s
S
S- 813,936
S
i
S
§ 108,611
i
!'
S'
S
" " ' l- ' "' -18 i a: ' -) - -
i . r+-..-- h.

S
S
s
S 64,572.38
S "
S-
!>
!> '1,17a.31
S ' " -
S
S ' "
S"
TOTAL EXPENDITURES (Sum lines 14 to 25) 26 S 922,547 S 65,747 TOTAL BALANCE (Subtract line 26 from 13) 27 S 945,312 S ' Please provide a specific description
City of Buena Park Sctedule 3
M2 Expenditure Report
Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2024
Streets and Roads Detailed Use of Funds
Type of Expenditure Line
No. MOE
Developer /
Impact Fees"
o
o
Interest
p
p
Interest Q
Q
Interest
x
x
Interest
Other
M2"
Other
M2
Interest
Other" TOTAL
Indirect and/or Overhead
Construction & Right-of-Way
New Street Construction
Street Reconstruction
Signals, Safety Devices, & Street Lights
Pedestrian Ways & Bikepaths
Storm Drains
Storm Damage
1 S S S s S S S s S S S S S
IM!aa%tW
S 1,
!"""'ettt-ir ._. ..-....i....,)} i' --'=-'-"' ""- 1Z3
2 :l
4 s
6 7
S
S 1,164,111.22
S
S
s
S
S
s
S
S
S
5 S
S
S
S
s
S
SSSSSSS
S
S
s
S
S
SSSSSSS
S 813,936.16
S
S
S
S
SS 64,572.38
SSSSSSSSSeSSSSSSS
s
S
S
s
S
S """"""""2""""
SeSSSs
S
s
s
S
S
S
S 2,042,619..

S
S
S
S
l'a
Total Construction'
Right of Way Acquisition
8 9
S 1,164,111.22
S
s
S
S
S
SSS
s
SSS 813,!136.16
S
5 64,572.38
SSSSSss
SSG
S
S 2,042,619.:

S f':

Total Construction & Right-of-Way
Maintenance
Patching
Overlay & Sealing
Street Lights & Traffic Signals
Storm Damage
Other Street Purpose Maintenance
10 5 1,164,111.22 S S S- s S- S 813,936.16 S 64,572.38 S- S- S S- S S 2,042,619.:!:. 7 m Bt'ttiitmt ''llN
ij'*i-ia-iti-e-rv.e M/f'a)MWWt aYI TIN' 7'i: -m":;.z:.izw'a7. 'atttt !
11 12
13 14
15 5
S
5 1,379,112.58
s
S 2,452,277.75
S
S
s
S
5 S
s
S
S
S
SSSSSS
:)
S
S
S
5-
SSSSS
s
5 S
SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
S
S
s
s
SSSSSS
S
S
S
s
s
S
S 1,379,112!
s
S 2,452,277.
l=i8
lIS
Total Maintenance'
Other
16 17
S 3,831,390.33 S
5 S
S
SSS
S
SSS
S
SSSSSSS
S 108,611.02
SS 1.174.32S
S
g 3,831,390.:

S iog,zss.:
13 I
7_ffl 04
GRANDTOTALS(Sum Lines1,10, 16, 17) 18 S 4,995,501.55 S s S S s S 813,936.16 S 64,572.38 S S S 108,611.02 S 1,174.:12 S g 5,983,795.1 l:i I
Finance Director Confirmation 19
Any Califomia Sta'leCOnStitUttonArttCleXIXStTeetSa ld (Oadettgible expenditure mad be aCOUntetrIn OCalju(tSdiCtiOniacatculation Of MOEtfthe aCtiV'tyISsupported iinded) by a localjurisdictions" iiscretionary funos (e.g. general funC The Califomia State Controller also provides useful information on Article XIXand the Streets and Highways Codeeligible expenditures in its aaGuidelinesRelatingto GasTax Expenditures for Cities and Countiesaa.I have reviewed and am :::::fot)i:::o:u:tealiJeffiaJJblityincalculatingandreportngonMaintenanceofEfforkexpenditures 11,
Project Description
A-M Freeway Prolects
o RegionalCapacity Program IRCP)
P Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program (RTSSP) Q Local Falt Share
R High Frequency Metiolink Seivice
s Transit Extensions to Metrolink
T
ConverkMettolink Station(s) to Re@ionalGateways that connect Orange County witt High-SpeedRailSystems
u Senior Mobility Program or Senior Non-Emergency Medical Program v Community BasedTransit/Circulators
Safe Transit Stops
x Enwonmental CleanupProgram lWatei Quality)
City of Buena Park Schedule 4
M2 Expenditure Report
Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2024
Local Fair Share Project List

PROJECT NAME AMOUNT EXPENDED
Orangethorpe Avenue Rehabilitation, Western to Stanton
Los Coyotes Pavement Rehabi!itation,-B-eachto Country Club E)r." CaballeroPavementRehabilitation,-'ValleyViewtoRegio " "- S 180,210.50
5 'i6,ss':i.so
S ' sij,'za':.;>zi
, S 878,508.54
City of Buena Park Signature Page
M2 Expenditure Report
Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2024
I hereby certify that:

JAII the information attached herein and included in schedules 1 through 4 is true and accurate to the best of my knowledge;
ffhe interest earned on Net Revenues allocated pursuant to the Ordinance shall be expended only for those purposes for which the Net Revenues were allocated;
EThe City of Buena Park is aware of the State Controller's "Guidelines Relating to Gas Tax Expenditures for Cities and Counties", which is a guide for determining MOE Expenditures for M2 Eligibility purposes; [Xhe City/County's Expenditure Report is in compliance with direction provided in the State Controller's "Guidelines Relating to Gas Tax Expenditures for Cities and Counties;" and Khe City of Buena Park has expended in this fiscal year an amount of local discretionary funds for streets and roads purposes at least equal to or exceeding the FY 2023-24 MOE benchmark dollar amountll Sung Hyun
Director of Finance (Print Name) Date
sig-M/l
" Jurisdictions are encouraged to submit MOE eligible expenditures higher than their MOE benchmark, so that should certain expenses be ruled ineligible during an MOE audit, the local jurisdiction still has sufficient MOE expenditures to demonstrate continued achievement of the MOE benchmark.

City of Buena Park
City Council Regular Meeting Agenda Report
L. RESOLUTION ACCEPTING GRANT FUNDS FROM THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE FOR THE 2024

TOBACCO GRANT PROGRAM AND APPROVAL OF A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING (MOU) FOR SAID GRANT
Meeting
Tuesday, November 12, 2024, 5:00 PM
Agenda Group
CONSENT CALENDAR Item: 4L.

Presented By
Jessica Fewer, Senior Management Analyst
Prepared By
Eddie Fenton, Assistant City Manager/Director of Human
Resources
Approved By
Aaron France, City Manager

RECOMMENDED ACTION
1) Adopt a resolution accepting grant funds from the California Department of Justice for the Tobacco Grant Program in the total amount of $444,180; 2) Approve a Memorandum of Understanding with the California Department of Justice for the grant; 3) Authorize the City Manager and City Attorney to make any necessary, non‐ monetary changes to the agreement; and, 4) Authorize the City Manager and the City Clerk to execute the MOU and other grant-related documents, as necessary.

PREVIOUS CITY COUNCIL ACTION
On January 10, 2023, the City accepted tobacco grant program funds in the amount of $296,387 for FY22-23 to FY24-25.

DISCUSSION
On July 27, 2021, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 1696, which amended the Buena Park Municipal Code to impose licensing and operating restrictions on tobacco retailers and prohibited the sale of flavored tobacco products within the City. In summary, the ordinance includes the following components:

Tobacco retailers are required to obtain a Tobacco Retail License from the City; Tobacco Retail Licenses are required to be renewed annually; The Tobacco Retail License, once issued, is not transferable; The Tobacco Retail License is issued by the Buena Park Community and Economic Development Department in consultation with the Buena Park Police Department; New Tobacco Retail Licenses shall not be issued to any business located within 500-feet of a public or private school (elementary through high school), public library, or public park; Any existing tobacco retailers located within 500 feet of the uses listed in the above bullet point, will become non-conforming land uses as defined in the Buena Park Zoning Code; and No tobacco retailer shall be allowed to sell flavored tobacco products of any kind.

This ordinance became effective on January 1, 2022, and has been enforced since that time.

In August 2022, staff, with the assistance of Townsend Public Affairs (TPA), submitted an application to the California Department of Justice for the Tobacco Grant program. The purpose of the Tobacco Grant program is to promote a healthier California by reducing illegal sales and marketing of cigarettes and tobacco products, including e-cigarettes, to minors and youth. The City successfully obtained a grant in the amount of $296,387, that was distributed over three fiscal years on a reimbursement basis. With these grant funds, the City paid a portion of a full-time Code Enforcement Officer salary and a portion of a part-time Code Enforcement Officer salary to conduct tobacco retail license inspections within the City. Grant funds also reimbursed a portion of the City's Marketing Specialist's salary to create an anti-smoking/vaping campaign that has included water bill inserts, signage, creation of a coloring book, and pay-per-click social media paid ads among other things.

Earlier this year, the City (with TPA assistance) applied for a new round of tobacco grant funding and received a grant in the amount of $444,180. The grant will continue to cover a portion of a full-time Code Enforcement Officer salary and a portion of a part-time Code Enforcement Officer salary to conduct tobacco retail inspections in the City. Additionally, the grant will fund minor decoy and shoulder tap undercover operations by the Buena Park Police Department to ensure tobacco products in the City are not sold to minors. These funds will be paid over a threeyear period commencing July 1, 2025, and will paid to the City on a reimbursement basis.

Staff recommends adopting the proposed resolution and approving the proposed MOU in order to accept the grant funds for this purpose.

BUDGET IMPACT
The grant is in the amount of $444,180 over a three fiscal years from FY25-26 to FY27-28 and will be granted on a reimbursement basis. Grant funds will be included in the next budget cycle for FY25-26.

Attachments
Reso Accepting 2024 CA DOJ Tobacco Grant FINAL.pdf
Buena Park_ MOU 24-25.pdf
RESOLUTION NO. ______

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BUENA

PARK, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING GRANT FUNDS IN THE
AMOUNT $444,180 FROM THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY

GENERAL, TOBACCO GRANT PROGRAM AND DESIGNATING

AND AUTHORIZING CERTAIN CITY OFFICIALS TO EXECUTE

DOCUMENTS FOR THE PURPOSE OF ACCEPTING THE

GRANT FUNDS
WHEREAS, the City of Buena Park (“City”) is interested in participating in the Tobacco Grant Program which is made available through the California Healthcare, Research and Prevention Tobacco Tax of 2016 (Proposition 56) and administered by the California Department of Justice (“DOJ") to support local efforts to reduce the illegal sale of tobacco products to minors in the City (the “Program”); and
WHEREAS, following the City’s submittal of a proposal for the Program, the State of California DOJ offered to award the City a three-year Program grant beginning July 1, 2025, and ending June 30, 2028; and
WHEREAS, grant funds will be used by the City for Code Enforcement Officer salaries associated with tobacco retailer inspections and City Police Department Officer overtime costs related to minor decoy and shoulder tap operations and costs associated with those initiatives; and
WHEREAS, to be considered eligible to receive grant funding, the City must submit a completed Grant Award Memorandum of Understanding to the State of California DOJ (“Memorandum of Understanding”).

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BUENA PARK does hereby determines, finds, and resolves as follows:

Section 1. That the foregoing recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by this reference.

Section 2. That the City Council hereby approves the Memorandum of Understanding, substantially in the form submitted with this resolution, and authorizes and directs the City Manager, or his./her authorized designee, to execute and submit for and on behalf of the City the Memorandum of Understanding and all associated documents, including, without limitation, agreements, amendments, extensions, and payment requests, in a form approved by the City Attorney, that are necessary and appropriate to accept the grant funds and comply with the conditions of the Program.

Section 3. The City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to establish all required accounts and make any and all expenditures, appropriations, transfers, and/or distributions of the RESOLUTION NO. _______

grant funds on behalf of the City as are necessary and appropriate to carry out the purpose and intent of this resolution.

Section 4. Grant funds received hereunder shall not be used to supplant ongoing law enforcement expenditures.

Section 5. This resolution shall be effective immediately upon adoption. The City Clerk shall certify to adoption of this resolution and add it to the official book of resolutions.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 12th day of November 2024, by the following called vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:
_________________________________
Mayor
ATTEST:
_______________________________
City Clerk
I, Adria M. Jimenez, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Buena Park, California, hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly and regularly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Buena Park, held this 12th of November 2024. _________________________________
City Clerk
Tobacco Grant Program
Grant Services Branch – Local Assistance
Division of Operations
Buena Park, City of DOJ-PROP56-2024-25-1-006

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING

PURPOSE
This Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”) is entered into by the Department of Justice (“DOJ”) and the Buena Park, City of (“Grantee”), for the purpose of disbursing grant funds to Grantee for reimbursement of expenditures in compliance with the California Code of Regulations and the Fiscal Year 2024-25 Grantee Handbook.

Commencing January 1, 2023, the California Code of Regulations, Title 11, Division 1, Chapter 5:

Department of Justice Tobacco Grant Program (“TGP Regulations”) shall govern the policies and procedures of the Tobacco Grant Program.

The TGP Regulations, Request for Proposals, Grantee Handbook (dated April 2024), and Summary of Award document are hereby incorporated by reference into this MOU. Grantee will expend funds for the purposes identified in the approved Summary of Award document. Reimbursements are to be funded under the California Healthcare, Research and Prevention Tobacco Tax Act of 2016, approved by the voters as Proposition 56.

COST REIMBURSEMENT
DOJ agrees to reimburse Grantee in arrears, for Grantee’s actual expenditures in performing the project or scope of work included in the approved Summary of Award document. Reimbursements for line items in the approved Budget Detail will be made upon receipt of invoices from Grantee and approval of the invoices by DOJ, in accordance with the reimbursement procedures set forth in the TGP Regulations and Grantee Handbook.

BUDGET CONTINGENCY CLAUSE
It is mutually agreed, if the Budget Act of the current fiscal year and/or any subsequent years covered under the MOU does not appropriate sufficient funds, the MOU shall be of no further force and effect.

In the event this situation occurs, DOJ shall have no liability to reimburse/pay any funds to Grantee, or to furnish any other considerations under this MOU. As well, Grantee shall not be obligated to continue performing the provisions of this MOU, for which the Grantee would have been reimbursed.

If funding for any fiscal year is reduced or deleted in the Budget Act for purposes of this MOU, DOJ shall have the option to either cancel this MOU with no liability occurring to DOJ or offer an addendum to the Grantee to reflect the reduced amount.

Buena Park, City of DOJ-PROP56-2024-25-1-006

PROJECT BREACH-TERMINATION
Failure of a Grantee to comply with this MOU or the TGP Regulations shall be treated by DOJ as a breach of contract. If an act of noncompliance occurs, DOJ may take actions described within the TGP Regulations, including termination. DOJ may terminate this MOU and be relieved of any obligation to disburse grant funds to Grantee should Grantee fail to perform the scope of work at the time and in the manner provided in this MOU.

MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS
Addendum – No addendum or variation of the terms of this MOU is valid unless made in writing and signed by the duly authorized representatives of the parties.

Assignment – This MOU is not assignable by Grantee in whole or in part.

Indemnification – Grantee agrees to indemnify and hold harmless DOJ, its officers, agents and employees from all claims, liabilities, or losses in connection with the performance of this MOU.

Certifications – Grantee certifies that it does not receive funding from a manufacturer, distributor, or advertiser of Cigarettes or Tobacco Products. Grantee further certifies that grant funds will not supplant existing state or local funds dedicated for the same purpose.

TERMS
Grant Duration: 11/1/2024 – 6/30/2028
Award Amount
Category of Expenditure Budget
FY 2024-2025
Budget
FY 2025-2026
Budget
FY 2026-2027
Budget
FY 2027-2028
Personal Services $ $131,882 $138,450 $145,354
Operating Expenses and
Equipment $ $2,412 $2,448 $2,484
Administrative Costs (Not to
Exceed 5%) $ $6,715 $7,045 $7,390
TOTAL AWARD AMOUNT $444,180
The time limit for reimbursements against this award ends 6/30/2028. Requests for reimbursement received after 7/15/2028 cannot be considered by DOJ.

GRANTEE CONTACT INFORMATION
Aaron France, City Manager
City of Buena Park
6650 Beach Boulevard
Buena Park, CA 90621
714-562-3550
[email protected]
Buena Park, City of DOJ-PROP56-2024-25-1-006

AUTHORIZATION
DOJ and Grantee, by their duly authorized officials, have executed this MOU on the respective dates indicated below. This MOU and any future addendums shall be e-mailed to [email protected], care of the Division of Operations, Local Assistance Unit, Tobacco Grant Program, and will become fully executed upon completion of signatures from all parties. ___________________________________ ___________________ NAME: AARON FRANCE Date
Title: City Manager
Agency: City of Buena Park
______________________________ ___________________
JENNIFER IVERY JOHNSON, Grant Manager Date
Division of Operations
California Department of Justice
___________________________________ ___________________ NICOLE LEARNED, Administrative Manager Date
Division of Operations
California Department of Justice
__________________________________ ___________________
CHRIS RYAN, Chief Date
Division of Operations
California Department of Justice
City of Buena Park
City Council Regular Meeting Agenda Report
M. AGREEMENT WITH THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA OFFICE OF TRAFFIC SAFETY (OTS) FOR THE SELECTIVE

TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM (STEP) GRANT
Authorize the Police Department to receive grant funding for STEP enforcement operations. The proposed agreement is in the amount of $180,000 and will fully reimburse STEP program-related activities.

Meeting
Tuesday, November 12, 2024, 5:00 PM
Agenda Group
CONSENT CALENDAR Item: 4M.

Presented By
Judy Williams, Lieutenant
Prepared By
Judy Williams, Lieutenant
Approved By
Aaron France, City Manager

RECOMMENDED ACTION
1) Approve an agreement with the State of California Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) for the Selective Traffic Enforcement Program (STEP) Grant (PT25003); 2) Authorize the City Manager and City Attorney to make any necessary, non-monetary changes to the agreement; 3) Ratify the Finance Director, Traffic Sergeant, and Traffic Lieutenant's execution of the agreement; 4) Authorize the Police Chief to execute all other necessary grant documents; and, 5) Approve a budget appropriation in the amount of $180,000 for this purpose.

PREVIOUS CITY COUNCIL ACTION
On November 14, 2023, the City Council approved a similar agreement with the OTS for the STEP program grant in the amount of $160,000.

DISCUSSION
The Buena Park Police Department (BPPD) has a well-established relationship with the OTS.  The BPPD has been awarded grant funding from the OTS in the past and has been recognized for its outstanding commitment toward increasing compliance with occupant restraint laws, removing impaired drivers from the roadways, increasing speed enforcement, and educating the public.  The proposed STEP grant is similar to past grants the BPPD has received from the OTS, which have enabled the City to continue its STEP program.  The program has been shown to be effective in reducing the number of persons killed and injured in crashes involving alcohol, diminishing speed, enforcing red light violations, and preventing other primary collision factors.

This grant was awarded to the City after a competitive application process with other California law enforcement agencies.  The funded strategies will be performed on an overtime basis (in an effort not to impact BPPD’s primary deployment), and involve driving under the influence (DUI) saturation patrols, distracted driving enforcement operations, motorcycle safety enforcement operations, and traffic safety educational presentations.

BUDGET IMPACT
The proposed STEP program grant is in the amount of $180,000.  There is no impact on the General Fund with the approval of this grant agreement.  All expenditures will be fully reimbursed by the OTS through this grant.

Attachments
Grant Agreement - PT25003 - signed.pdf
10/16/2024 8:11:40 AM Page 1 of 19
State of California – Office of Traffic Safety

GRANT AGREEMENT

GRANT NUMBER
PT25003

1. GRANT TITLE
Selective Traffic Enforcement Program (STEP)

2. NAME OF AGENCY 3. Grant Period
Buena Park From:

To:
10/01/2024
09/30/2025 4. AGENCY UNIT TO ADMINISTER GRANT
Buena Park Police Department

5. GRANT DESCRIPTION
Best practice strategies will be conducted to reduce the number of persons killed and injured in crashes involving alcohol and other primary crash factors. The funded strategies may include impaired driving enforcement, enforcement operations focusing on primary crash factors, distracted driving, night-time seat belt enforcement, special enforcement operations encouraging motorcycle safety, enforcement and public awareness in areas with a high number of bicycle and pedestrian crashes, and educational programs. These strategies are designed to earn media attention thus enhancing the overall deterrent effect.

6. Federal Funds Allocated Under This Agreement Shall Not Exceed: $180,000.00

7. TERMS AND CONDITIONS: The parties agree to comply with the terms and conditions of the following which are by this reference made a part of the Agreement:
 Schedule A – Problem Statement, Goals and Objectives and Method of Procedure  Schedule B – Detailed Budget Estimate and Sub-Budget Estimate (if applicable)  Schedule B-1 – Budget Narrative and Sub-Budget Narrative (if applicable)  Exhibit A – Certifications and Assurances
 Exhibit B* – OTS Grant Program Manual
 Exhibit C – Grant Electronic Management System (GEMS) Access *Items shown with an asterisk (*), are hereby incorporated by reference and made a part of this agreement as if attached hereto.

These documents can be viewed at the OTS home web page under Grants: www.ots.ca.gov.

We, the officials named below, hereby swear under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that we are duly authorized to legally bind the Grant recipient to the above described Grant terms and conditions.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement has been executed by the parties hereto.

8. Approval Signatures
A. GRANT DIRECTOR B. AUTHORIZING OFFICIAL
NAME:

TITLE:

EMAIL:

PHONE:

ADDRESS:

Connor Lee
Sergeant
[email protected]
(714) 562-3943
6650 Beach Blvd
Buena Park, CA 90621
ADDRESS: Judy Williams
Police Lieutenant
[email protected]
(714) 562-3942
6650 Beach Blvd
Buena Park, CA 90621
{{_es_signer2_signature}} {{_es_signer2_date}} {{_es_signer4_signature}} {{_es_signer4_date}} (Signature) (Date) (Signature) (Date)
C. FISCAL OFFICIAL D. AUTHORIZING OFFICIAL OF OFFICE OF TRAFFIC SAFETY ADDRESS: Sung Hyun
City Finance Director
[email protected]
(714) 562-3713
6650 Beach Blvd
Buena Park, CA 90621
ADDRESS: Barbara Rooney
Director
[email protected]
(916) 509-3030
2208 Kausen Drive, Suite 300
Elk Grove, CA 95758
{{_es_signer3_signature}} {{_es_signer3_date}} {{_es_signer6_signature}} {{_es_signer6_date}} (Signature) (Date) (Signature) (Date)
Connor Lee (Oct 16, 2024 08:26 PDT)
Connor Lee Oct 16, 2024 Sung Hyun (Oct 16, 2024 09:20 PDT) Sung Hyun Oct 16, 2024 judith williams (Oct 16, 2024 09:52 PDT) Oct 16, 2024 Barbara Rooney (Oct 21, 2024 11:55 PDT) Barbara Rooney Oct 21, 2024 10/16/2024 8:11:40 AM Page 2 of 19
E. ACCOUNTING OFFICER OF OFFICE OF TRAFFIC SAFETY 9. SAM INFORMATION NAME: Carolyn Vu SAM #:

REGISTERED
ADDRESS:

CITY:

ZIP+4:

SVZ5KRE9KFC3
6650 Beach Blvd. Buena Park Ca. 90621
Buena Park
90621-2905
ADDRESS: 2208 Kausen Drive, Suite 300
Elk Grove, CA 95758

10. PROJECTED EXPENDITURES
FUND CFDA ITEM/APPROPRIATION F.Y. CHAPTER STATUTE PROJECTED

EXPENDITURES
164AL-25.1 20.608 0521-0890-101 2023 12/23 BA/23 $23,682.00 402PT-25.1 20.600 0521-0890-101 2023 12/23 BA/23 $15,071.00 402PT-25 20.600 0521-0890-101 2024 22/24 BA/24 $54,929.00 164AL-25 20.608 0521-0890-101 2024 22/24 BA/24 $86,318.00

AGREEMENT
TOTAL $180,000.00

AMOUNT ENCUMBERED BY THIS DOCUMENT
I CERTIFY upon my own personal knowledge that the budgeted funds for the current budget year are available for the period and purpose of the expenditure stated above.
$180,000.00

PRIOR AMOUNT ENCUMBERED FOR THIS

AGREEMENT
$ 0.00
OTS ACCOUNTING OFFICER’S SIGNATURE DATE SIGNED TOTAL AMOUNT ENCUMBERED TO DATE {{_es_signer5_signature}} {{_es_signer
Oct 16, 2024
5_date}} $180,000.00
10/16/2024 8:11:40 AM Page 3 of 19
State of California – Office of Traffic Safety

GRANT AGREEMENT
Schedule A

GRANT NUMBER
PT25003

1. PROBLEM STATEMENT
Buena Park encompasses 10.5 square miles, located in Northwest Orange County adjacent to Los Angeles County with a population of approximately 85,000 people. Our city is the home to the Knott's Berry Farm resort and amusement park. This alone can send our daytime population well into the low 100,000's, creating extra strain on our resources and increases or traffic congestion. During the month of October, each year the Halloween Haunt event at Knott's Berry Farm brings an additional 20,000 to 30,000 guests each night to Buena Park, significantly affecting traffic patterns and increasing the potential for DUI and other traffic related violations including pedestrian hazards.

In 2023, Buena Park identified unsafe/improper turning, unsafe speed, and traffic signal and sign violations as the top three primary crash factors. Unsafe/Improper turning resulting in 31 crashes, leading to 42 injuries. Unsafe speed was involved in 31 crashes, causing 39 injuries and 5 fatalities. Additionally, violations of traffic signals and signs accounted for 40 crashes and 51 injuries. There were also 15 alcoholinvolved crashes, resulting in 15 injuries and 2 fatalities. These crash factors present a serious safety concern for the City of Buena Park, as the high number of crashes, injuries, and fatalities underscores the urgent need to targeted interventions. Addressing these dangerous driving behaviors is critical to improving road safety and reducing the incidence of preventable crashes in the community.

Also, the following statistics are using 2022 as the base year in comparison with 2023. In 2023 we had a 266.7% increase in fatal traffic crashes from 3 to 11. Injury involved traffic crashes increased by 24.9% from 209 to 261. Pedestrian fatalities increased by 50% from 2 to 3. Alcohol involved fatalities remained the same as the base year with 2. Alcohol involved injury crashes decreased 11.8% from 17 to 15. Motorcycle involved fatality crashes increased 200% from 0 to 2. The number of bicyclist’s fatalities remained the same with 0 in both years.

The statistics show that alcohol involved crashes; fatal crashes and fatal crashes remained the same however, we had an overwhelming increase in fatalities in general. This increase also was reflected with fatalities involving pedestrians. Overall, our numbers increased across the board as compared to previous years. Significant increase was largely in part to fatal crashes being on the rise. Traffic on our roadways was greater than previous years as was pedestrian traffic. We had an increase in vehicle, pedestrian, and bicycle traffic throughout our city in 2023. It is a priority for our agency to continue to enforce and educate the public on the dangers of drinking and driving, pedestrian safety and speeding enforcement.

Additionally, the first three months of the current grant we have experienced two fatal traffic crashes. One of the fatal crashes involved a police pursuit of a stolen vehicle. The suspect crashed within 20 seconds of the start of the pursuit. The suspect passed away and injured his passenger. We continue to see an increased disregard regarding driver safety within our city.

The main goal of the Buena Park Police Department is to reduce alcohol-related crashes and increase public awareness of the dangers of DUI by strictly enforcing DUI violations and increasing overall traffic safety by conducting enforcement programs containing specific goals and objectives. The statistics although increased, still show a need for added enforcement involving primary crash enforcement in order to reduce injury-involved crashes. We have made an effort to try to pinpoint more accurately, where our more serious crashes occur to help reduce injury crashes. The statistics still show a need for consistent DUI enforcement as well as dedicated pedestrian, bicycle, and motorcycle enforcement as well as education.

Since 2009, our department’s traffic bureau has suffered personnel loss due to staffing, negatively impacting the unit’s ability to staff our city streets as we once did in years past. In 2009, our unit deployed seven motorcycle officers; to date we now have four. We are carrying vacancies for a DUI officer and have since added one additional spot which was a civilian traffic investigator. This reduction has extended the work throughout the existing traffic employees and has led to a decrease in overall productivity. 10/16/2024 8:11:40 AM Page 4 of 19
We have lost our commercial enforcement officer and our DUI officer back to patrol due to staffing shortages. Our department as a whole is short personnel, but DUI and traffic related enforcement remains a high priority.

2. PERFORMANCE MEASURES
A. Goals:

1. Reduce the number of persons killed in traffic crashes.

2. Reduce the number of persons injured in traffic crashes.

3. Reduce the number of pedestrians killed in traffic crashes.

4. Reduce the number of pedestrians injured in traffic crashes.

5. Reduce the number of bicyclists killed in traffic crashes.

6. Reduce the number of bicyclists injured in traffic crashes.

7. Reduce the number of persons killed in alcohol-involved crashes.

8. Reduce the number of persons injured in alcohol-involved crashes.

9. Reduce the number of persons killed in drug-involved crashes.

10. Reduce the number of persons injured in drug-involved crashes.

11. Reduce the number of persons killed in alcohol/drug combo-involved crashes.

12. Reduce the number of persons injured in alcohol/drug combo-involved crashes.

13. Reduce the number of motorcyclists killed in traffic crashes.

14. Reduce the number of motorcyclists injured in traffic crashes.

15. Reduce hit & run fatal crashes.

16. Reduce hit & run injury crashes.

17. Reduce nighttime (2100 - 0259 hours) fatal crashes.

18. Reduce nighttime (2100 - 0259 hours) injury crashes.

B. Objectives: Target Number

1. Issue a press release announcing the kick-off of the grant by November 15. The kick-off press releases and media advisories, alerts, and materials must be emailed to the OTS Public Information Officer at [email protected], and copied to your OTS Coordinator, for approval 7 days prior to the issuance date of the release.
1 2. Participate and report data (as required) in the following campaigns; Quarter 1:

National Pedestrian Safety Month, National Walk to School Day, National Teen Driver Safety Week, NHTSA Winter Mobilization; Quarter 3: National Distracted Driving Awareness Month, National Motorcycle Safety Month, National Bicycle Safety Month, National Click it or Ticket Mobilization; Quarter 4: National Speed Prevention Campaigns, NHTSA Summer Mobilization, National Child Passenger Safety Week, and California's Pedestrian Safety Month.
12 3. Develop (by December 31) and/or maintain a “DUI BOLO” program to notify patrol and traffic officers to be on the lookout for identified repeat DUI offenders with a suspended or revoked license as a result of DUI convictions. Updated DUI BOLOs should be distributed to patrol and traffic officers monthly. 12 4. Send law enforcement personnel to the NHTSA Standardized Field Sobriety Testing (SFST) (minimum 16 hours) POST-certified training. 4 5. Send law enforcement personnel to the NHTSA Advanced Roadside Impaired Driving Enforcement (ARIDE) 16 hour POST-certified training. 4 6. Send law enforcement personnel to the Drug Recognition Expert (DRE) training (classroom and field training must be completed).
2 7. Send law enforcement personnel to the DRE Recertification training. 2

8. Send law enforcement personnel to SFST Instructor training. 1

9. Send law enforcement personnel to DRE Instructor training. 1

10. Conduct DUI/DL Checkpoints. A minimum of 1 checkpoint should be conducted during the NHTSA Winter Mobilization and 1 during the Summer Mobilization. To enhance the overall deterrent effect and promote high visibility, it is recommended the grantee issue an advance press release and conduct social media activity for each checkpoint. For combination DUI/DL checkpoints, departments should issue press releases that mention DL's will be checked at the DUI/DL checkpoint. Signs for DUI/DL checkpoints should read "DUI/Driver's License Checkpoint Ahead." 6 10/16/2024 8:11:40 AM Page 5 of 19
OTS does not fund or support independent DL checkpoints. Only on an exception basis and with OTS pre-approval will OTS fund checkpoints that begin prior to 1800 hours. When possible, DUI/DL Checkpoint screeners should be DRE- or ARIDE-trained.

11. Conduct DUI Saturation Patrol operation(s). 31

12. Conduct Traffic Enforcement operation(s), including but not limited to, primary crash factor violations.
22 13. Conduct highly publicized Distracted Driving enforcement operation(s) targeting drivers using hand held cell phones and texting.
5 14. Conduct highly publicized Motorcycle Safety enforcement operation(s) in areas or during events with a high number of motorcycle incidents or crashes resulting from unsafe speed, DUI, following too closely, unsafe lane changes, improper turning, and other primary crash factor violations by motorcyclists and other drivers. 5 15. Conduct highly publicized pedestrian and/or bicycle enforcement operation(s) in areas or during events with a high number of pedestrian and/or bicycle crashes resulting from violations made by pedestrians, bicyclists, and drivers. 8 16. Conduct Traffic Safety educational presentation(s) with an effort to reach community members. Note: Presentation(s) may include topics such as distracted driving, DUI, speed, bicycle and pedestrian safety, seat belts and child passenger safety.
4 17. Participate in highly visible collaborative DUI Enforcement operations. 4

18. Participate in highly visible collaborative Traffic Enforcement operations. 2

19. Send law enforcement personnel to DUI Checkpoint Planning and Management training.
2 20. Conduct specialized enforcement operations focusing specifically on street racing and sideshow activities.
2 3. METHOD OF PROCEDURE
A. Phase 1 – Program Preparation (1st Quarter of Grant Year)  The department will develop operational plans to implement the “best practice” strategies outlined in the objectives section.
 All training needed to implement the program should be conducted in the first quarter.  All grant related purchases needed to implement the program should be made in the first quarter.  In order to develop/maintain the “DUI BOLOs,” research will be conducted to identify the “worst of the worst” repeat DUI offenders with a suspended or revoked license as a result of DUI convictions. The DUI BOLO may include the driver’s name, last known address, DOB, description, current license status, and the number of times suspended or revoked for DUI. DUI BOLOs should be updated and distributed to traffic and patrol officers at least monthly.  Implementation of the STEP grant activities will be accomplished by deploying personnel at high crash locations.

Media Requirements:

Issue a press release approved by the OTS PIO announcing the kick-off of the grant by November 15, but no sooner than October 1. The kick-off release must be approved by the OTS PIO and only distributed after the grant is fully signed and executed. If you are unable to meet the November 15 deadline to issue a kick-off press release, communicate reasons to your OTS grant coordinator and OTS PIO.

B. Phase 2 – Program Operations (Throughout Grant Year)  The department will work to create media opportunities throughout the grant period to call attention to the innovative program strategies and outcomes.

Media Requirements
The following requirements are for all grant-related activities:
 Send all media advisories, alerts, videos, graphics, artwork, posters, radio/PSA/video scripts, storyboards, digital and/or print educational materials for grant-related activities to the OTS PIO at [email protected] for approval and copy your OTS grant coordinator. Optimum lead time would 10/16/2024 8:11:40 AM Page 6 of 19
be 7 days before the scheduled release but at least 3 business days prior to the scheduled release date for review and approval is appreciated.
 Send all Powerpoint presentations, online presentations and trainings for grant-related activities to the OTS PIO at [email protected] for approval and copy your OTS grant coordinator. Certified training courses are EXEMPT from the approval process.
 The OTS PIO is responsible for the approval of the design and content of materials. The agency understands OTS PIO approval is not authorizing approval of budget expenditure or cost. Any cost approvals must come from the OTS grant coordinator.  Pre-approval is not required when using any OTS-supplied template for media advisories, press releases, social media graphics, videos or posts, or any other OTS-supplied educational material.

However, copy the OTS PIO at [email protected] and your OTS grant coordinator when any material is distributed to the media and public, such as a press release, educational material, or link to social media post. The OTS-supplied kick-off press release templates and any kickoff press releases are an exception to this policy and require prior approval before distribution to the media and public.
 If an OTS-supplied template, educational material, social media graphic, post or video is substantially changed, the changes shall be sent to the OTS PIO at [email protected] for approval and copy to your OTS grant coordinator. Optimum lead time would be 7 days prior to the scheduled release date, but at least 3 business days prior to the scheduled release date for review and approval is appreciated.
 Press releases, social media posts and alerts on platforms such as NextDoor and Nixle reporting immediate and time-sensitive grant activities (e.g. enforcement operations, day of event highlights or announcements, event invites) are exempt from the OTS PIO approval process. The OTS PIO and your OTS grant coordinator should still be notified when the grant-related activity is happening (e.g. car seat checks, bicycle rodeos, community presentations, DUI checkpoints, etc.).
 Enforcement activities such as warrant and probation sweeps, court stings, etc. that are embargoed or could impact operations by publicizing in advance are exempt from the PIO approval process. However, announcements and results of activities should still be copied to the OTS PIO at [email protected] and your OTS grant coordinator with embargoed date and time or with “INTERNAL ONLY: DO NOT RELEASE” message in subject line of email.  Any earned or paid media campaigns for TV, radio, digital or social media that are part of a specific grant objective, using OTS grant funds, or designed and developed using contractual services by a subgrantee, requires prior approval. Please send to the OTS PIO at [email protected] for approval and copy your grant coordinator at least 3 business days prior to the scheduled release date.
 Social media posts highlighting state or national traffic safety campaigns (Distracted Driving Month, Motorcycle Safety Awareness Month, etc.), enforcement operations (DUI checkpoints, etc.), or any other grant-related activity such as Bicycle rodeos, presentations, or events, are highly encouraged but do not require prior approval.
 Submit a draft or rough-cut of all digital, printed, recorded or video material (brochures, posters, scripts, artwork, trailer graphics, digital graphics, social posts connected to an earned or paid media campaign grant objective) to the OTS PIO at [email protected] and copy your OTS grant coordinator for approval prior to the production or duplication.  Use the following standard language in all press, media, and printed materials, space permitting:

Funding for this program was provided by a grant from the California Office of Traffic Safety, through the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.  Space permitting, include the OTS logo on all grant-funded print materials, graphics and paid or earned social media campaign grant objective; consult your OTS grant coordinator for specifics, format-appropriate logos, or if space does not permit the use of the OTS logo.  Email the OTS PIO at [email protected] and copy your OTS grant coordinator at least 21 days in advance, or when first confirmed, a short description of any significant grant-related traffic safety event or program, particularly events that are highly publicized beforehand with anticipated media coverage so OTS has sufficient notice to arrange for attendance and/or participation in the event.

If unable to attend, email the OTS PIO and coordinator brief highlights and/or results, including any media coverage (broadcast, digital, print) of event within 7 days following significant grantrelated event or program. Media and program highlights are to be reflected in QPRs. 10/16/2024 8:11:40 AM Page 7 of 19
 Any press releases, work plans, scripts, storyboards, artwork, graphics, videos or any educational or informational materials that received OTS PIO approval in a prior grant year needs to be resubmitted for approval in the current grant year.  For additional guidance, refer to the OTS Grants Materials Approval Process Guidelines and OTS Grants Media Approval Process FAQs on the OTS website.  Contact the OTS PIO or your OTS grant coordinator for consultation when changes from any of the above requirements might be warranted.

C. Phase 3 – Data Collection & Reporting (Throughout Grant Year)

1. Prepare and submit grant claim invoices (due January 30, April 30, July 30, and October 30)

2. Prepare and submit Quarterly Performance Reports (QPR) (due January 30, April 30, July 30, and October 30)
 Collect and report quarterly, appropriate data that supports the progress of goals and objectives.  Provide a brief list of activity conducted, procurement of grant-funded items, and significant media activities. Include status of grant-funded personnel, status of contracts, challenges, or special accomplishments.
 Provide a brief summary of quarterly accomplishments and explanations for objectives not completed or plans for upcoming activities.
 Collect, analyze and report statistical data relating to the grant goals and objectives.

4. METHOD OF EVALUATION
Using the data compiled during the grant, the Grant Director will complete the “Final Evaluation” section in the fourth/final Quarterly Performance Report (QPR). The Final Evaluation should provide a brief summary of the grant’s accomplishments, challenges and significant activities. This narrative should also include whether goals and objectives were met, exceeded, or an explanation of why objectives were not completed.

5. ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT
This program has full administrative support, and every effort will be made to continue the grant activities after grant conclusion.
10/16/2024 8:11:40 AM Page 8 of 19
State of California – Office of Traffic Safety

GRANT AGREEMENT
Schedule B

GRANT NUMBER
PT25003

FUND NUMBER CATALOG

NUMBER (CFDA)

FUND DESCRIPTION TOTAL AMOUNT
402PT-25 20.600 State and Community Highway
Safety
$70,000.00
164AL-25 20.608 Minimum Penalties for Repeat
Offenders for Driving While
Intoxicated
$110,000.00

COST CATEGORY FUND
NUMBER

UNIT COST OR
RATE

UNITS TOTAL COST TO
GRANT
A. PERSONNEL COSTS
Straight Time
$0.00
Overtime
DUI/DL Checkpoints 164AL-25 $10,000.00 6 $60,000.00
DUI Saturation Patrols 164AL-25 $1,350.00 31 $41,850.00 Collaborative DUI Enforcement 164AL-25 $1,307.00 4 $5,228.00 Benefits for 164AL OT @ 1.45% 164AL-25 $107,078.00 1 $1,553.00 Traffic Enforcement 402PT-25 $1,350.00 22 $29,700.00
Distracted Driving 402PT-25 $1,250.00 5 $6,250.00
Motorcycle Safety 402PT-25 $1,350.00 5 $6,750.00
Pedestrian and Bicycle Enforcement 402PT-25 $1,350.00 8 $10,800.00 Street Racing and Sideshow Enforcement
Operations
402PT-25 $1,350.00 2 $2,700.00
Collaborative Traffic Enforcement 402PT-25 $1,350.00 2 $2,700.00 Traffic Safety Educational Presentations 402PT-25 $300.00 4 $1,200.00 Benefits for 402PT OT @ 1.45% 402PT-25 $60,100.00 1 $871.00 Category Sub-Total $169,602.00
B. TRAVEL EXPENSES
In State Travel 402PT-25 $2,729.00 1 $2,729.00
$0.00
Category Sub-Total $2,729.00
C. CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
$0.00
Category Sub-Total $0.00
D. EQUIPMENT
$0.00
Category Sub-Total $0.00
E. OTHER DIRECT COSTS
DUI Checkpoint Supplies 164AL-25 $1,369.00 1 $1,369.00
Computer or Tablet 402PT-25 $2,100.00 3 $6,300.00
Category Sub-Total $7,669.00
F. INDIRECT COSTS
$0.00
Category Sub-Total $0.00
GRANT TOTAL $180,000.00
10/16/2024 8:11:40 AM Page 9 of 19
State of California – Office of Traffic Safety

GRANT AGREEMENT
Schedule B-1

GRANT NUMBER
PT25003

BUDGET NARRATIVE

PERSONNEL COSTS
DUI/DL Checkpoints - Overtime for grant funded law enforcement operations conducted by appropriate department personnel.

DUI Saturation Patrols - Overtime for grant funded law enforcement operations conducted by appropriate department personnel.

Collaborative DUI Enforcement - Overtime for grant funded Collaborative DUI Enforcement operations conducted by appropriate department personnel
Benefits for 164AL OT @ 1.45% - Claimed amounts must reflect actual benefit costs for overtime hours charged to the grant.

Medicare - 1.45%
Traffic Enforcement - Overtime for grant funded law enforcement operations conducted by appropriate department personnel.

Distracted Driving - Overtime for grant funded law enforcement operations conducted by appropriate department personnel.

Motorcycle Safety - Overtime for grant funded law enforcement operations conducted by appropriate department personnel.

Pedestrian and Bicycle Enforcement - Overtime for grant funded law enforcement operations conducted by appropriate department personnel.

Street Racing and Sideshow Enforcement Operations - Overtime for grant funded law enforcement operations conducted by appropriate department personnel.

Collaborative Traffic Enforcement - Overtime for grant funded Collaborative Traffic Enforcement operations conducted by appropriate department personnel
Traffic Safety Educational Presentations - Overtime for grant funded traffic safety educational presentations conducted by appropriate department personnel.

Benefits for 402PT OT @ 1.45% - Claimed amounts must reflect actual benefit costs for overtime hours charged to the grant.

Medicare - 1.45%

TRAVEL EXPENSES
In State Travel - Costs are included for appropriate staff to attend conferences and training events supporting the grant goals and objectives and/or traffic safety. Local mileage for grant activities and meetings is included. Anticipated travel may include Lifesavers in Long Beach and the OTS Traffic Safety Law Enforcement Forum. All conferences, seminars or training not specifically identified in the Budget Narrative must be approved by OTS. All travel claimed must be at the agency approved rate. Per Diem may not be claimed for meals provided at conferences when registration fees are paid with OTS grant funds.

CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
-

EQUIPMENT
-

OTHER DIRECT COSTS
DUI Checkpoint Supplies - On-scene supplies needed to conduct sobriety checkpoints. Costs may include 28" traffic cones, MUTCD compliant traffic signs, MUTCD compliant high visibility vests (maximum of 10), traffic counters (maximum of 2), generator, gas for generators, lighting, reflective banners, electronic flares, PAS Device/Calibration Supplies, heater, propane for heaters, fan, anti-fatigue mats, and canopies.

Additional items may be purchased if approved by OTS. The cost of food and beverages will not be reimbursed. Each item must have a unit cost of less than $5,000 (including tax and shipping).

Computer or Tablet - For use in tracking or conducting grant activities and producing required reports. Costs may include a desktop computer, monitor, laptop, tablet, printer, software and accessories. 10/16/2024 8:11:40 AM Page 10 of 19

INDIRECT COSTS
-

STATEMENTS/DISCLAIMERS
There will be no program income generated from this grant.

Nothing in this “agreement” shall be interpreted as a requirement, formal or informal, that a particular law enforcement officer issue a specified or predetermined number of citations in pursuance of the goals and objectives here under.

Benefits for personnel costs can only be applied to straight time or overtime hours charged to the grant. 10/16/2024 8:11:40 AM Page 11 of 19
State of California – Office of Traffic Safety

GRANT AGREEMENT
Exhibit A

GRANT NUMBER
PT25003
Certifications and Assurances for Fiscal Year 2024 Highway Safety Grants (23 U.S.C. Chapter 4 or Section 1906, Public Law 109-59, as amended by Section 25024, Public Law 117-58) The officials named on the grant agreement, certify by way of signature on the grant agreement signature page, that the Grantee Agency complies with all applicable Federal statutes, regulations, and directives and State rules, guidelines, policies, and laws in effect with respect to the periods for which it receives grant funding. Applicable provisions include, but are not limited to, the following:

GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
The State will comply with applicable statutes and regulations, including but not limited to:
 23 U.S.C. Chapter 4—Highway Safety Act of 1966, as amended;  Sec. 1906, Public Law 109-59, as amended by Sec. 25024, Public Law 117-58;  23 CFR part 1300—Uniform Procedures for State Highway Safety Grant Programs;  2 CFR part 200—Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards;  2 CFR part 1201—Department of Transportation, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards.

NONDISCRIMINATION
(applies to all subrecipients as well as States)
The State highway safety agency [and its subrecipients] will comply with all Federal statutes and implementing regulations relating to nondiscrimination (“Federal Nondiscrimination Authorities”). These include but are not limited to:
 Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000d et seq., 78 stat. 252), (prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin);
 49 CFR part 21 (entitled Non-discrimination in Federally-Assisted Programs of the Department of Transportation— Effectuation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964);  28 CFR 50.3 (U.S. Department of Justice Guidelines for Enforcement of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964);  The Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, (42 U.S.C. 4601), (prohibits unfair treatment of persons displaced or whose property has been acquired because of Federal or Federal-aid programs and projects);  Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1973, (23 U.S.C. 324 et seq.), and Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, as amended (20 U.S.C. 1681-1683 and 1685-1686) (prohibit discrimination on the basis of sex);  Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, (29 U.S.C. 794 et seq.), as amended, (prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability) and 49 CFR part 27;
 The Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended, (42 U.S.C. 6101 et seq.), (prohibits discrimination on the basis of age);
 The Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987, (Pub. L. 100-209), (broadens scope, coverage, and applicability of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, The Age Discrimination Act of 1975 and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, by expanding the definition of the terms “programs or activities” to include all of the programs or activities of the Federal aid recipients, subrecipients and contractors, whether such programs or activities are Federally-funded or not);  Titles II and III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (42 U.S.C. 12131-12189) (prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability in the operation of public entities, public and private transportation systems, places of public accommodation, and certain testing) and 49 CFR parts 37 and 38;
 Executive Order 12898, Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations (preventing discrimination against minority populations by discouraging programs, policies, and activities with disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental effects on minority and low-income populations);
 Executive Order 13166, Improving Access to Servicesfor Persons with Limited English Proficiency (requiring that recipients of Federal financial assistance provide meaningful access for applicants and beneficiaries who have limited English proficiency (LEP));
 Executive Order 13985, Advancing Racial Equity and Support for Underserved Communities through the Federal Government (advancing equity across the Federal Government); and  Executive Order 13988, Preventing and Combating Discrimination on the Basis of Gender Identity or Sexual Orientation (clarifying that sex discrimination includes discrimination on the grounds of gender identity or sexual orientation).

The preceding statutory and regulatory cites hereinafter are referred to as the “Acts” and “Regulations,” respectively.

GENERAL ASSURANCES
10/16/2024 8:11:40 AM Page 12 of 19
In accordance with the Acts, the Regulations, and other pertinent directives, circulars, policy, memoranda, and/or guidance, the Recipient hereby gives assurance that it will promptly take any measures necessary to ensure that:
“No person in the United States shall, on the grounds of race, color, or national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination under any program or activity, for which the Recipient receives Federal financial assistance from DOT, including NHTSA.”
The Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987 clarified the original intent of Congress, with respect to Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and other non-discrimination requirements (the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973), by restoring the broad, institutional-wide scope and coverage of these nondiscrimination statutes and requirements to include all programs and activities of the Recipient, so long as any portion of the program is Federally assisted.

SPECIFIC ASSURANCES
More specifically, and without limiting the above general Assurance, the Recipient agrees with and gives the following Assurances with respect to its Federally assisted Highway Safety Grant Program:

1. The Recipient agrees that each “activity,” “facility,” or “program,” as defined in 49 CFR part 21 will be (with regard to an “activity”) facilitated, or will be (with regard to a “facility”) operated, or will be (with regard to a “program”) conducted in compliance with all requirements imposed by, or pursuant to the Acts and the Regulations.

2. The Recipient will insert the following notification in all solicitations for bids, Requests For Proposals for work, or material subject to the Acts and the Regulations made in connection with all Highway Safety Grant Programs and, in adapted form, in all proposals for negotiated agreements regardless of funding source:
“The [name of Recipient], in accordance with the provisions of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (78 Stat. 252, 42 U.S.C 2000d to 2000d-4) and the Regulations, hereby notifies all bidders that it will affirmatively ensure that in any contract entered into pursuant to this advertisement, disadvantaged business enterprises will be afforded full and fair opportunity to submit bids in response to this invitation and will not be discriminated against on the grounds of race, color, or national origin in consideration for an award.”

3. The Recipient will insert the clauses of appendix A and E of this Assurance (also referred in every contract or agreement subject to the Acts and the Regulations.

4. The Recipient will insert the clauses of appendix B of DOT Order 1050.2A, as a covenant running with the land, in any deed from the United States effecting or recording a transfer of real property, structures, use, or improvements thereon or interest therein to a Recipient.

5. That where the Recipient receives Federal financial assistance to construct a facility, or part of a facility, the Assurance will extend to the entire facility and facilities operated in connection therewith.

6. That where the Recipient receives Federal financial assistance in the form of, or for the acquisition of, real property or an interest in real property, the Assurance will extend to rights to space on, over, or under such property.

7. That the Recipient will include the clauses set forth in appendix C and appendix D of this DOT Order 1050.2A, as a covenant running with the land, in any future deeds, leases, licenses, permits, or similar instruments entered into by the Recipient with other parties:
a. for the subsequent transfer of real property acquired or improved under the applicable activity, project, or program; and
b. for the construction or use of, or access to, space on, over, or under real property acquired or improved under the applicable activity, project, or program.

8. That this Assurance obligates the Recipient for the period during which Federal financial assistance is extended to the program, except where the Federal financial assistance is to provide, or is in the form of, personal property, or real property, or interest therein, or structures or improvements thereon, in which case the Assurance obligates the Recipient, or any transferee for the longer of the following periods:
a. the period during which the property is used for a purpose for which the Federal financial assistance is extended, or for another purpose involving the provision of similar services or benefits; or b. the period during which the Recipient retains ownership or possession of the property.

9. The Recipient will provide for such methods of administration for the program as are found by the Secretary of Transportation or the official to whom he/she delegates specific authority to give reasonable guarantee that it, other recipients, sub-recipients, sub- grantees, contractors, subcontractors, consultants, transferees, successors in interest, and other participants of Federal financial assistance under such program will comply with all requirements imposed or pursuant to the Acts, the Regulations, and this Assurance.

10. The Recipient agrees that the United States has a right to seek judicial enforcement with regard to any matter arising under the Acts, the Regulations, and this Assurance.

By signing this ASSURANCE, the State highway safety agency also agrees to comply (and require any sub-recipients, sub-grantees, contractors, successors, transferees, and/or assignees to comply) with all applicable provisions governing NHTSA's access to records, accounts, documents, information, facilities, and staff. You also recognize that you must comply with any program or compliance reviews, and/or complaint investigations conducted by NHTSA. You must keep records, reports, and submit the material for review 10/16/2024 8:11:40 AM Page 13 of 19
upon request to NHTSA, or its designee in a timely, complete, and accurate way. Additionally, you must comply with all other reporting, data collection, and evaluation requirements, as prescribed by law or detailed in program guidance.

The State highway safety agency gives this ASSURANCE in consideration of and for obtaining any Federal grants, loans, contracts, agreements, property, and/or discounts, or other Federal-aid and Federal financial assistance extended after the date hereof to the recipients by the U.S. Department of Transportation under the Highway Safety Grant Program. This ASSURANCE is binding on the State highway safety agency, other recipients, sub-recipients, sub-grantees, contractors, subcontractors and their subcontractors', transferees, successors in interest, and any other participants in the Highway Safety Grant Program. The person(s) signing below is/are authorized to sign this ASSURANCE on behalf of the Recipient.

THE DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE ACT OF 1988 (41 U.S.C. 8103)
The Subgrantee will provide a drug-free workplace by:
a. Publishing a statement notifying employees that the unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensing, possession or use of a controlled substance is prohibited in the grantee's workplace, and specifying the actions that will be taken against employees for violation of such prohibition;
b. Establishing a drug-free awareness program to inform employees about:

1. The dangers of drug abuse in the workplace;

2. The grantee's policy of maintaining a drug-free workplace;

3. Any available drug counseling, rehabilitation, and employee assistance programs;

4. The penalties that may be imposed upon employees for drug violations occurring in the workplace;

5. Making it a requirement that each employee engaged in the performance of the grant be given a copy of the statement required by paragraph (a);
c. Notifying the employee in the statement required by paragraph (a) that, as a condition of employment under the grant, the employee will—

1. Abide by the terms of the statement;

2. Notify the employer of any criminal drug statute conviction for a violation occurring in the workplace no later than five days after such conviction;
d. Notifying the agency within ten days after receiving notice under subparagraph (c)(2) from an employee or otherwise receiving actual notice of such conviction;
e. Taking one of the following actions, within 30 days of receiving notice under subparagraph (c)(2), with respect to any employee who is so convicted—

1. Taking appropriate personnel action against such an employee, up to and including termination;

2. Requiring such employee to participate satisfactorily in a drug abuse assistance or rehabilitation program approved for such purposes by a Federal, State, or local health, law enforcement, or other appropriate agency; f. Making a good faith effort to continue to maintain a drug-free workplace through implementation of all of the paragraphs above.

POLITICAL ACTIVITY (HATCH ACT)
(applies to all subrecipients as well as States)
The State will comply with provisions of the Hatch Act (5 U.S.C. 1501-1508), which limits the political activities of employees whose principal employment activities are funded in whole or in part with Federal funds.

CERTIFICATION REGARDING FEDERAL LOBBYING
(applies to all subrecipients as well as States)

CERTIFICATION FOR CONTRACTS, GRANTS, LOANS, AND COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS The undersigned certifies, to the best of his or her knowledge and belief, that:

1. No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the undersigned, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any Federal contract, the making of any Federal grant, the making of any Federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement;

2. If any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, the undersigned shall complete and submit Standard Form-LLL, “Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying,” in accordance with its instructions;

3. The undersigned shall require that the language of this certification be included in the award documents for all subawards at all tiers (including subcontracts, subgrants, and contracts under grant, loans, and cooperative agreements) and that all subrecipients shall certify and disclose accordingly. 10/16/2024 8:11:40 AM Page 14 of 19
This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into this transaction imposed by section 1352, title 31, U.S. Code. Any person who fails to file the required certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure.

RESTRICTION ON STATE LOBBYING
(applies to subrecipients as well as States)
None of the funds under this program will be used for any activity specifically designed to urge or influence a State or local legislator to favor or oppose the adoption of any specific legislative proposal pending before any State or local legislative body. Such activities include both direct and indirect (e.g., “grassroots”) lobbying activities, with one exception. This does not preclude a State official whose salary is supported with NHTSA funds from engaging in direct communications with State or local legislative officials, in accordance with customary State practice, even if such communications urge legislative officials to favor or oppose the adoption of a specific pending legislative proposal.

CERTIFICATION REGARDING DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION
(applies to all subrecipients as well as States)

INSTRUCTIONS FOR PRIMARY TIER PARTICIPANT CERTIFICATION (STATES)

1. By signing and submitting this proposal, the prospective primary tier participant is providing the certification set out below and agrees to comply with the requirements of 2 CFR parts 180 and 1200.

2. The inability of a person to provide the certification required below will not necessarily result in denial of participation in this covered transaction. The prospective primary tier participant shall submit an explanation of why it cannot provide the certification set out below. The certification or explanation will be considered in connection with the department or agency's determination whether to enter into this transaction. However, failure of the prospective primary tier participant to furnish a certification or an explanation shall disqualify such person from participation in this transaction.

3. The certification in this clause is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when the department or agency determined to enter into this transaction. If it is later determined that the prospective primary tier participant knowingly rendered an erroneous certification, in addition to other remedies available to the Federal Government, the department or agency may terminate this transaction for cause or default or may pursue suspension or debarment.

4. The prospective primary tier participant shall provide immediate written notice to the department or agency to which this proposal is submitted if at any time the prospective primary tier participant learns its certification was erroneous when submitted or has become erroneous by reason of changed circumstances.

5. The terms covered transaction, civil judgment, debarment, suspension, ineligible, participant, person, principal, and voluntarily excluded, as used in this clause, are defined in 2 CFR parts 180 and 1200. You may contact the department or agency to which this proposal is being submitted for assistance in obtaining a copy of those regulations.

6. The prospective primary tier participant agrees by submitting this proposal that, should the proposed covered transaction be entered into, it shall not knowingly enter into any lower tier covered transaction with a person who is proposed for debarment under 48 CFR part 9, subpart 9.4, debarred, suspended, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this covered transaction, unless authorized by the department or agency entering into this transaction.

7. The prospective primary tier participant further agrees by submitting this proposal that it will include the clause titled “Instructions for Lower Tier Participant Certification” including the “Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion—Lower Tier Covered Transaction,” provided by the department or agency entering into this covered transaction, without modification, in all lower tier covered transactions and in all solicitations for lower tier covered transactions and will require lower tier participants to comply with 2 CFR parts 180 and 1200.

8. A participant in a covered transaction may rely upon a certification of a prospective participant in a lower tier covered transaction that it is not proposed for debarment under 48 CFR part 9, subpart 9.4, debarred, suspended, ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from the covered transaction, unless it knows that the certification is erroneous. A participant is responsible for ensuring that its principals are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise ineligible to participate in covered transactions. To verify the eligibility of its principals, as well as the eligibility of any prospective lower tier participants, each participant may, but is not required to, check the System for Award Management Exclusions website (https://www.sam.gov/).

9. Nothing contained in the foregoing shall be construed to require establishment of a system of records in order to render in good faith the certification required by this clause. The knowledge and information of a participant is not required to exceed that which is normally possessed by a prudent person in the ordinary course of business dealings.

10. Except for transactions authorized under paragraph 6 of these instructions, if a participant in a covered transaction knowingly enters into a lower tier covered transaction with a person who is proposed for debarment under 48 CFR part 9, subpart 9.4, suspended, debarred, ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this transaction, in addition to other remedies available to the Federal Government, the department or agency may terminate the transaction for cause or default.

CERTIFICATION REGARDING DEBARMENT, SUSPENSION, AND OTHER RESPONSIBILITY MATTERS—

PRIMARY TIER COVERED TRANSACTIONS
10/16/2024 8:11:40 AM Page 15 of 19

1. The prospective primary tier participant certifies to the best of its knowledge and belief, that it and its principals:
a. Are not presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participating in covered transactions by any Federal department or agency; b. Have not within a three-year period preceding this proposal been convicted of or had a civil judgment rendered against them for commission of fraud or a criminal offense in connection with obtaining, attempting to obtain, or performing a public (Federal, State, or local) transaction or contract under a public transaction; violation of Federal or State antitrust statutes or commission of embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records, making false statements, or receiving stolen property; c. Are not presently indicted for or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a governmental entity (Federal, State, or local) with commission of any of the offenses enumerated in paragraph (1)(b) of this certification; and
d. Have not within a three-year period preceding this application/proposal had one or more public transactions (Federal, State, or local) terminated for cause or default.

2. Where the prospective primary tier participant is unable to certify to any of the Statements in this certification, such prospective participant shall attach an explanation to this proposal.

INSTRUCTIONS FOR LOWER TIER PARTICIPANT CERTIFICATION

1. By signing and submitting this proposal, the prospective lower tier participant is providing the certification set out below and agrees to comply with the requirements of 2 CFR parts 180 and 1200.

2. The certification in this clause is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was entered into. If it is later determined that the prospective lower tier participant knowingly rendered an erroneous certification, in addition to other remedies available to the Federal Government, the department or agency with which this transaction originated may pursue available remedies, including suspension or debarment.

3. The prospective lower tier participant shall provide immediate written notice to the person to which this proposal is submitted if at any time the prospective lower tier participant learns that its certification was erroneous when submitted or has become erroneous by reason of changed circumstances.

4. The terms covered transaction, civil judgment, debarment, suspension, ineligible, participant, person, principal, and voluntarily excluded, as used in this clause, are defined in 2 CFR parts 180 and 1200. You may contact the person to whom this proposal is submitted for assistance in obtaining a copy of those regulations.

5. The prospective lower tier participant agrees by submitting this proposal that, should the proposed covered transaction be entered into, it shall not knowingly enter into any lower tier covered transaction with a person who is proposed for debarment under 48 CFR part 9, subpart 9.4, debarred, suspended, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this covered transaction, unless authorized by the department or agency with which this transaction originated.

6. The prospective lower tier participant further agrees by submitting this proposal that it will include the clause titled “Instructions for Lower Tier Participant Certification” including the “Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion—Lower Tier Covered Transaction,” without modification, in all lower tier covered transactions and in all solicitations for lower tier covered transactions and will require lower tier participants to comply with 2 CFR parts 180 and 1200.

7. A participant in a covered transaction may rely upon a certification of a prospective participant in a lower tier covered transaction that it is not proposed for debarment under 48 CFR part 9, subpart 9.4, debarred, suspended, ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from the covered transaction, unless it knows that the certification is erroneous. A participant is responsible for ensuring that its principals are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise ineligible to participate in covered transactions. To verify the eligibility of its principals, as well as the eligibility of any prospective lower tier participants, each participant may, but is not required to, check the System for Award Management Exclusions website ( https://www.sam.gov/).

8. Nothing contained in the foregoing shall be construed to require establishment of a system of records in order to render in good faith the certification required by this clause. The knowledge and information of a participant is not required to exceed that which is normally possessed by a prudent person in the ordinary course of business dealings.

9. Except for transactions authorized under paragraph 5 of these instructions, if a participant in a covered transaction knowingly enters into a lower tier covered transaction with a person who is proposed for debarment under 48 CFR part 9, subpart 9.4, suspended, debarred, ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this transaction, in addition to other remedies available to the Federal Government, the department or agency with which this transaction originated may pursue available remedies, including suspension or debarment.

CERTIFICATION REGARDING DEBARMENT, SUSPENSION, INELIGIBILITY AND VOLUNTARY EXCLUSION—

LOWER TIER COVERED TRANSACTIONS

1. The prospective lower tier participant certifies, by submission of this proposal, that neither it nor its principals is presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participating in covered transactions by any Federal department or agency.
10/16/2024 8:11:40 AM Page 16 of 19

2. Where the prospective lower tier participant is unable to certify to any of the statements in this certification, such prospective participant shall attach an explanation to this proposal.

BUY AMERICA
(applies to subrecipients as well as States)
The State and each subrecipient will comply with the Buy America requirement (23 U.S.C. 313) when purchasing items using Federal funds. Buy America requires a State, or subrecipient, to purchase with Federal funds only steel, iron and manufactured products produced in the United States, unless the Secretary of Transportation determines that such domestically produced items would be inconsistent with the public interest, that such materials are not reasonably available and of a satisfactory quality, or that inclusion of domestic materials will increase the cost of the overall project contract by more than 25 percent. In order to use Federal funds to purchase foreign produced items, the State must submit a waiver request that provides an adequate basis and justification for approval by the Secretary of Transportation.

CERTIFICATION ON CONFLICT OF INTEREST
(applies to subrecipients as well as States)

GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
No employee, officer, or agent of a State or its subrecipient who is authorized in an official capacity to negotiate, make, accept, or approve, or to take part in negotiating, making, accepting, or approving any subaward, including contracts or subcontracts, in connection with this grant shall have, directly or indirectly, any financial or personal interest in any such subaward. Such a financial or personal interest would arise when the employee, officer, or agent, any member of his or her immediate family, his or her partner, or an organization which employs or is about to employ any of the parties indicated herein, has a financial or personal interest in or a tangible personal benefit from an entity considered for a subaward. Based on this policy:

1. The recipient shall maintain a written code or standards of conduct that provide for disciplinary actions to be applied for violations of such standards by officers, employees, or agents. a. The code or standards shall provide that the recipient's officers, employees, or agents may neither solicit nor accept gratuities, favors, or anything of monetary value from present or potential subawardees, including contractors or parties to subcontracts.
b. The code or standards shall establish penalties, sanctions, or other disciplinary actions for violations, as permitted by State or local law or regulations.

2. The recipient shall maintain responsibility to enforce the requirements of the written code or standards of conduct.

DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS
No State or its subrecipient, including its officers, employees, or agents, shall perform or continue to perform under a grant or cooperative agreement, whose objectivity may be impaired because of any related past, present, or currently planned interest, financial or otherwise, in organizations regulated by NHTSA or in organizations whose interests may be substantially affected by NHTSA activities. Based on this policy:

1. The recipient shall disclose any conflict of interest identified as soon as reasonably possible, making an immediate and full disclosure in writing to NHTSA. The disclosure shall include a description of the action which the recipient has taken or proposes to take to avoid or mitigate such conflict.

2. NHTSA will review the disclosure and may require additional relevant information from the recipient. If a conflict of interest is found to exist, NHTSA may (a) terminate the award, or (b) determine that it is otherwise in the best interest of NHTSA to continue the award and include appropriate provisions to mitigate or avoid such conflict.

3. Conflicts of interest that require disclosure include all past, present, or currently planned organizational, financial, contractual, or other interest(s) with an organization regulated by NHTSA or with an organization whose interests may be substantially affected by NHTSA activities, and which are related to this award. The interest(s) that require disclosure include those of any recipient, affiliate, proposed consultant, proposed subcontractor, and key personnel of any of the above. Past interest shall be limited to within one year of the date of award. Key personnel shall include any person owning more than a 20 percent interest in a recipient, and the officers, employees or agents of a recipient who are responsible for making a decision or taking an action under an award where the decision or action can have an economic or other impact on the interests of a regulated or affected organization.

PROHIBITION ON USING GRANT FUNDS TO CHECK FOR HELMET USAGE (applies to all subrecipients as well as States)
The State and each subrecipient will not use 23 U.S.C. Chapter 4 grant funds for programs to check helmet usage or to create checkpoints that specifically target motorcyclists. 10/16/2024 8:11:40 AM Page 17 of 19

POLICY ON SEAT BELT USE
In accordance with Executive Order 13043, Increasing Seat Belt Use in the United States, dated April 16, 1997, the Grantee is encouraged to adopt and enforce on-the-job seat belt use policies and programs for its employees when operating company-owned, rented, or personally-owned vehicles. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is responsible for providing leadership and guidance in support of this Presidential initiative. For information and resources on traffic safety programs and policies for employers, please contact the Network of Employers for Traffic Safety (NETS), a public-private partnership dedicated to improving the traffic safety practices of employers and employees. You can download information on seat belt programs, costs of motor vehicle crashes to employers, and other traffic safety initiatives at www.trafficsafety.org. The NHTSA website (www.nhtsa.gov) also provides information on statistics, campaigns, and program evaluations and references.

POLICY ON BANNING TEXT MESSAGING WHILE DRIVING
In accordance with Executive Order 13513, Federal Leadership On Reducing Text Messaging While Driving, and DOT Order 3902.10, Text Messaging While Driving, States are encouraged to adopt and enforce workplace safety policies to decrease crashes caused by distracted driving, including policies to ban text messaging while driving companyowned or rented vehicles, Government-owned, leased or rented vehicles, or privately-owned vehicles when on official Government business or when performing any work on or behalf of the Government. States are also encouraged to conduct workplace safety initiatives in a manner commensurate with the size of the business, such as establishment of new rules and programs or re-evaluation of existing programs to prohibit text messaging while driving, and education, awareness, and other outreach to employees about the safety risks associated with texting while driving. 10/16/2024 8:11:40 AM Page 18 of 19

INSTRUCTIONS FOR ADDING OR UPDATING GEMS USERS

1. Each agency is allowed a total of FIVE (5) GEMS Users.

2. GEMS Users listed on this form will be authorized to login to GEMS to complete and submit Quarterly Performance Reports (QPRs) and reimbursement claims.

3. Complete the form if adding, removing or editing a GEMS user(s).

4. The Grant Director must sign this form and return it with the Grant Agreement.

CURRENT GEMS USER(S)

1. Connor Lee
Title: Sergeant Media Contact: Yes
Phone: (714) 562-3943
Email: [email protected]

2. Roger Plumlee
Title: Police Sergeant Media Contact: Yes
Phone: (714) 562-3902
Email: [email protected]

3. Judy Williams
Title: Police Lieutenant Media Contact: No
Phone: (714) 562-3942
Email: [email protected]
State of California – Office of Traffic Safety
OTS-55 Grant Electronic Management System (GEMS) Access Exhibit C

GRANT NUMBER
PT25003

GRANT DETAILS
Grant Number: PT25003
Agency Name: Buena Park Police Department
Grant Title: Selective Traffic Enforcement Program (STEP) Agreement Total: $180,000.00
Authorizing Official: Judy Williams
Fiscal Official: Sung Hyun
Grant Director: Connor Lee
10/16/2024 8:11:40 AM Page 19 of 19
Complete the below information if adding, removing or editing a GEMS user(s) GEMS User 1
Add/Change {{[]c11_es_:signer1}} Remove Access {{[] c12_es_:signer1}} Add as a media contact? Yes {{[]c1_es_:signer1}} No{{[]c2_es_:signer1}} {{UserName1_es_:signer1 }} {{UserTitle1_es_:signer1 }}
Name Job Title
{{UserEmail1_es_:signer1 }} {{UserPhone1_es_:signer1 }} Email address Phone number
GEMS User 2
Add/Change {{[]c13_es_:signer1}} Remove Access {{[]c14_es_:signer1}} Add as a media contact? Yes {{[]c3_es_:signer1}}No {{[]c4_es_:signer1}} {{UserName2_es_:signer1 }} {{UserTitle2_es_:signer1 }}
Name Job Title
{{UserEmail2_es_:signer1 }} {{UserPhone2_es_:signer1 }} Email address Phone number
GEMS User 3
Add/Change {{[]c15_es_:signer1}} Remove Access {{[]c16_es_:signer1}} Add as a media contact? Yes {{[]c5_es_:signer1}}No {{[]c6_es_:signer1}} {{UserName3_es_:signer1 }} {{UserTitle3_es_:signer1 }}
Name Job Title
{{UserEmail3_es_:signer1 }} {{UserPhone3_es_:signer1 }} Email address Phone number
GEMS User 4
Add/Change {{[]c17_es_:signer1}} Remove Access {{[]c18_es_:signer1}} Add as a media contact? Yes {{[]c8_es_:signer1}}No {{[]c7_es_:signer1}} {{UserName4_es_:signer1 }} {{UserTitle4_es_:signer1 }}
Name Job Title
{{UserEmail4_es_:signer1 }} {{UserPhone4_es_:signer1 }} Email address Phone number
GEMS User 5
Add/Change {{[]c19_es_:signer1}} Remove Access {{[]c20_es_:signer1}} Add as a media contact? Yes {{[]c9_es_:signer1}}No {{[]c10_es_:signer1}} {{UserName5_es_:signer1 }} {{UserTitle5_es_:signer1 }}
Name Job Title
{{UserEmail5_es_:signer1 }} {{UserPhone5_es_:signer1 }} Email address Phone number
Form completed by: {{Sig_es_:signer1:signature}} Date: {{Dte1_es_:signer1:date}} As a signatory I hereby authorize the listed individual(s) to represent and have GEMS user access. {{Sig_es_:signer2:signature}} {{Name1_es_:signer2:fullname }} Signature Name
{{Dte2_es_:signer2:date}} Grant Director
Date Title
Connor Lee (Oct 16, 2024 08:25 PDT)
Connor Lee Oct 16, 2024 Connor Lee (Oct 16, 2024 08:26 PDT) Connor Lee Connor Lee Oct 16, 2024
Grant Agreement - PT25003
Final Audit Report 2024-10-21
Created: 2024-10-16
By: Thuy Marshall ([email protected])
Status: Signed
Transaction ID: CBJCHBCAABAAqjmRWsyXAAtyOv494fgl0XgZKMJTRKrX "Grant Agreement - PT25003" History
Document created by Thuy Marshall ([email protected]) 2024-10-16 - 3:11:57 PM GMT
Document emailed to [email protected] for signature
2024-10-16 - 3:12:05 PM GMT
Email viewed by [email protected]
2024-10-16 - 3:14:20 PM GMT
Signer [email protected] entered name at signing as Connor Lee 2024-10-16 - 3:25:24 PM GMT
Document e-signed by Connor Lee ([email protected])
Signature Date: 2024-10-16 - 3:25:26 PM GMT - Time Source: server Document emailed to [email protected] for signature
2024-10-16 - 3:25:28 PM GMT
Email viewed by [email protected]
2024-10-16 - 3:25:59 PM GMT
Signer [email protected] entered name at signing as Connor Lee 2024-10-16 - 3:26:22 PM GMT
Document e-signed by Connor Lee ([email protected])
Signature Date: 2024-10-16 - 3:26:24 PM GMT - Time Source: server Document emailed to Sung Hyun ([email protected]) for signature 2024-10-16 - 3:26:26 PM GMT
Email viewed by Sung Hyun ([email protected])
2024-10-16 - 4:19:44 PM GMT
Document e-signed by Sung Hyun ([email protected])
Signature Date: 2024-10-16 - 4:20:46 PM GMT - Time Source: server Document emailed to judith williams ([email protected]) for signature 2024-10-16 - 4:20:48 PM GMT
Email viewed by judith williams ([email protected])
2024-10-16 - 4:41:52 PM GMT
Document e-signed by judith williams ([email protected]) Signature Date: 2024-10-16 - 4:52:17 PM GMT - Time Source: server Document emailed to Jessica Chan ([email protected]) for signature 2024-10-16 - 4:52:19 PM GMT
Email viewed by Jessica Chan ([email protected])
2024-10-16 - 5:53:14 PM GMT
Document e-signed by Jessica Chan ([email protected]) Signature Date: 2024-10-16 - 5:53:30 PM GMT - Time Source: server Document emailed to Barbara Rooney ([email protected]) for signature 2024-10-16 - 5:53:32 PM GMT
Email viewed by Barbara Rooney ([email protected]) 2024-10-21 - 6:55:44 PM GMT
Document e-signed by Barbara Rooney ([email protected]) Signature Date: 2024-10-21 - 6:55:58 PM GMT - Time Source: server Agreement completed.
2024-10-21 - 6:55:58 PM GMT
City of Buena Park
City Council Regular Meeting Agenda Report
N. FINAL PAYMENT TO ROY ALLAN SLURRY SEAL, INC. FOR THE 2023-2024 ANNUAL SLURRY SEAL PROJECT Meeting
Tuesday, November 12, 2024, 5:00 PM
Agenda Group
CONSENT CALENDAR Item: 4N.

Presented By
Aaron Esparza-Almaraz, Assistant Engineer
Prepared By
Mina Mikhael, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
Approved By
Aaron France, City Manager

RECOMMENDED ACTION
1) Accept the project as complete and approve a final payment to Roy Allan Slurry Seal, Inc. in the amount of $286,827; and 2) Direct the Public Works Director to file a Notice of Completion.

PREVIOUS CITY COUNCIL ACTION
On August 13, 2024, the City Council approved a contract with Roy Allan Slurry Seal, Inc. in the amount of $273,759 for the 2023-2024 Annual Slurry Seal Project. The approved total construction project budget of $303,759 includes a construction contingency of $30,000.

DISCUSSION
Slurry seal projects are an important part of the City’s pavement management plan. A slurry seal is a proactive maintenance treatment that prolongs the life of asphalt at a fraction of the cost of full pavement (structural) repair.

This treatment provides a new wearing surface for the road and protects it from sun and water damage. By sealing small cracks and imperfections, slurry sealing prevents water penetration into underlying layers, averting water damage resulting in potholes and pavement failures. Work limits of the 2023-2024 Annual Slurry Seal Project included the Crescent Avenue Frontage, Los Altos Drive, Los Encinos Street, Los Santos Way, Los Rancheros Drive, Los Nietos Street, Los Pacos Street, Los Feliz Drive, Los Indios Circle, Los Ramos Circle, Los Rapidos Circle, and Los Cientos Circle.

Contract Dates
Advertisement:            06/17/2024
Contract Awarded:      08/13/2024
Notice to Proceed:      09/03/2024
Work Completed:        09/24/2024
The contractor has submitted a bill for work completed as of October 17, 2024. All items, quantities, and prices have been checked and found to be in accordance with the contract documents. The final payment is in the amount of $286,827. The final contract cost for this project is $286,827, which includes change orders and quantity changes. This amount is $16,932 (or 5.6%) under the approved construction project budget of $303,759. The total retention is in the amount of $14,341, and will be released following the expiration of the 35-day lien period. An analysis of expenditures is listed in Appendix “A” – Capital Improvement Project Final Report.

It is hereby recommended that the City Council accept the project as complete and turn the public facility over to City forces for maintenance and operation.

BUDGET IMPACT
The final cost of the project is $286,827.  This project was funded by the Gas Tax Fund (Account No. 24-9806- 590010).

Attachments
Att1of3 Memo to Finance .pdf
Att2of3 Appendix A.pdf
Att3of3 Contractor Invoice.pdf

MEMORANDUM
Department of Public Works
DATE: November 12, 2024
TO: Adrian Garcia, Finance Manager
FROM: Mina Mikhael, P.E., Director of Public Works / City Engineer SUBJECT: 2023-2024 ANNUAL SLURRY SEAL PROJECT
Amount: $286,827.00 Account No.: 24-9806-590010
Purchase Order: 250138
Contractor: Roy Allan Slurry Seal Inc.
12643 Emmens Way Ste A
Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670
Date Warrants are to be Mailed: 11/21/2024
RECOMMENDATION:

It is recommended that the Finance Officer issue a warrant for the final payment on this contract.

CERTIFICATION:

This is to certify that the subject project has been completed satisfactorily. The contractor has submitted the final bill for the completed work and is entitled to payment in the amount of $286,827.00 less 5% retained (attached). Bid items, quantities and prices have been checked through this department and are found to be accurate in accordance with the contract documents. A copy of the final report is attached for your file. A “Notice of Completion” will be filed by the Public Works upon approval of the City Council, and following the expiration of the 35-day lien period; the 5% retention will be released to the contractor. Final Payment represents 100% completion to date.

C: Aaron Esparza-Almaraz, Assistant Engineer
Gloria Hernandez, Account Clerk

CONTRACT
Original Construction Contract Amount $273,759.00
Council Approved Construction Contingency Funds $30,000.00 Approved Construction Contract Amount $303,759.00

CONTRACT ADJUSTMENTS
Contract Change Orders
CCO#1 Install 8 Traffic Loop Detectors $7,568.00
CCO#2 Extra Striping $5,500.00
Total Contract Adjustments $13,068.00

CONTRACT EXPENDITURES
Previous Payments
Value of Work Done Previously $0.00
Retention Held Previously $0.00
Less Previous Payments $0.00
Final Payment
Value of Work Done This Period $286,827.00
Retention Held This Period -$14,341.35
Total Amount Due This Payment $272,485.65

PROJECT SUMMARY
Original Construction Contract Amount $273,759.00
Total Construction Contract Adjustment $13,068.00
Revised Construction Contract $286,827.00
Approved Construction Contract Amount $303,759.00
Amount Under the Approved Construction Contract Amount $16,932.00 Percentage Under the ApprovedConstruction Contract Amount 5.6% 2023-2024 Annual Slurry Seal Project
Appendix "A" - Capital Improvement Project Final Report

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
To(OWNER): CITY OF BUENA PARK Project: BUENA PARK Application No: 1 Page 1 BUENA PARK Invoice No: 4621REV
Invoice Date: 9/16/2024
Period To: 9/8/2024
From: ROY ALLAN SLURRY SEAL INC. Via(Architect/: Project No: 24-135 JOB 3656 12643 EMMENS WAY STE A Engineer) Contract Date:

SANTA FE SPRINGS, CA 90670
(562) 864-3363
For:

Total Unit Total Completed Current Prior Due This
No. Description Quantity Cost Cost Units Value Value Request 1 BMOS 1 LS 2,600.00 2,600.00 1 2,600.00 0.00 2,600.00
2 INFORMATION SIGNS REMOVE AND 1 LS 25,190.00 25,190.00 1 25,190.00 0.00 25,190.00

REPLACE STRIPING
3 TYPE I RPMS 409,800 SF 0.33 135,234.00 409,800 135,234.00 0.00 135,234.00 4 COLD MILL 2" 23,000 SF 1.40 32,200.00 23,000 32,200.00 0.00 32,200.00 5 CONSTRUCT 2" AC 23,000 SF 2.80 64,400.00 23,000 64,400.00 0.00 64,400.00 6 REMOVE EXISTING AC 25,700 SF 0.55 14,135.00 25,700 14,135.00 0.00 14,135.00 CCO1 INSTALL 8 LOOP DETECTORS 1 LS 7,568.00 7,568.00 1 7,568.00 0.00 7,568.00 3EA-5EA
CC02 STRIPING 1 LS 5,500.00 5,500.00 1 5,500.00 0.00 5,500.00 286,827.00 286,827.00 0.00 286,827.00
Contract sum......................................... 286,827.00 Completed to date................................. 286,827.00 Retainage.............................................. 14,341.35 Total earned less retainage..................... 272,485.65 Previous billings..................................... 0.00 Current payment due............................. 272,485.65 Sales tax............................................... 0.00 Total due.............................................. 272,485.65 City of Buena Park
City Council Regular Meeting Agenda Report
O. APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 19 AND FINAL PAYMENT TO MBC ENTERPRISES, INC. FOR THE PEAK

PARK AND BOISSERANC PARK POOL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT
Meeting
Tuesday, November 12, 2024, 5:00 PM
Agenda Group
CONSENT CALENDAR Item: 4O.

Presented By
Hysun Lee, Assistant Engineer
Prepared By
Mina Mikhael, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
Approved By
Aaron France, City Manager

RECOMMENDED ACTION
1) Approve Change Order No. 19 in amount of $105,000; 2) Accept the project as complete and approve a final payment to MBC Enterprises, Inc. in the amount of $121,489.26; 3) Direct the Public Works Director to file a Notice of Completion; and, 4) Authorize the City Manager to sign Change Order No. 19 on behalf of the City.

PREVIOUS CITY COUNCIL ACTION
On August 21, 2023, the City Council approved a contract with MBC Enterprises, Inc. in the amount of $2,099,648.79 for the Peak Park and Boisseranc Park Pool Improvements Project. The approved total construction project budget of $2,207,748.79 included a construction contingency of $100,000 and administration of the Community Workforce Agreement (CWA) in the amount of $8,100.

On September 12, 2023, the City Council approved a budget transfer of $120,000 from the undesignated General Fund balance to increase the total value of the contract awarded to MBC. On January 9, 2024, the City Council approved a budget amendment in the amount of $200,000 from the  undesignated General Fund balance to the Project account due to several unexpected obstacles encountered related to the site conditions.

DISCUSSION
The Peak Park and Boisseranc Park Pool Improvements Project has been completed.

The Peak Park Pool improvements included:

Demolition of the pool plaster, pool deck, and shade structures Repair of the pool shell crack
Replacement of pool tiles and depth markers
Installation of new underwater lighting, wiring, and conduits Installation of new concrete deck with slot drains and monolithic pool coping Installation of new raised planter with seating and shade structure with overhead lighting Installation of new one-meter diving boards
Installation of new ADA compliant pool lift chairs, and new ADA pool ramp Installation of new gates along the fence
The Boisseranc Park Pool improvements included:

Demolition of the pool coping, pool deck, pool fence, gates, shower, and existing water slide Replacement of the pool depth markers
Installation of new underwater lighting, wiring, and conduits Installation of new concrete deck with slot drains and pool coping Installation of new ADA-compliant pool lift chairs
Installation of new 8-ft. high wrought iron fence and gates Relocation of chemical storage to existing shed next door Addition of new pump for a dual pump system
Installation of a new ADA-compliant shower
Contract Dates:

Advertisement:            August 10, 2023
Contract Awarded:      August 21, 2023
Notice to Proceed:      November 2, 2023
Work Completed:        October 18, 2024
The contractor has submitted a bill for work completed as of October 18, 2024. The contractor and the City staff came to a mutually agreed-upon final Change Order No. 19 in amount of $105,000 to resolve all outstanding disputes, including, but not limited to, change order items and work completed under protest. All items, quantities, and prices have been checked and found to be in accordance with the contract documents. The final payment is in the amount of $121,489.26, which includes the final change order. The final contract cost for this project is $2,593,282.74, which includes change orders and quantity changes. This amount is $5,314.94 (or 0.2%) under the approved construction project budget of $2,598,597.68. The total retention is in the amount of $129,664.14, and will be released following the expiration of the 35-day lien period. An analysis of expenditures is listed in Appendix “A” – Capital Improvement Project Final Report.

It is hereby recommended that the City Council accept the project as complete and turn the public facility over to City forces for maintenance and operation.

BUDGET IMPACT
The final cost of the project is $2,593,282.74. This project was included in the FY 2023-2024 Capital Improvement Program budget and funded from the General Fund (Account No 32-9806-290163).

Attachments
Peak Boisseranc Pools Att1of4 Finance Memo.pdf
Peak Boisseranc Pools Att2of4 Appendix A.pdf
Peak Boisseranc Pools Att3of4 Invoice.pdf
Peak Boisseranc Pools Att4of4 CCO No19.pdf

MEMORANDUM
Department of Public Works
DATE: November 12, 2024
TO: Adrian Garcia, Finance Manager
FROM: Mina Mikhael, P.E., Director of Public Works / City Engineer SUBJECT: PEAK PARK AND BOISSERANC PARK POOL IMPROVEMENTS

PROJECT
Amount: $121,489.26 Account No.: 32-9806-290163
Purchase Order: 240234
Contractor: MBC ENTERPRISES, INC
8631 Universe Avenue
Westminster, CA 92683

Payment Process Date per City Schedule: November 21, 2024 RECOMMENDATION:

It is recommended that the Finance Officer issue a warrant for the final payment on this contract.

CERTIFICATION:

This is to certify that the subject project has been completed satisfactorily. The contractor has submitted the final bill for the completed work and is entitled to payment in the amount of $121,489.26 less 5% retained (attached). Bid items, quantities and prices have been checked through this department and are found to be accurate in accordance with the contract documents. A copy of the final report is attached for your file. A “Notice of Completion” will be filed by the Public Works upon approval of the City Council, and following the expiration of the 35-day lien period; the 5% retention will be released to the contractor. Final Payment represents 100% completion to date.

C: Hysun Lee, Assistant Engineer
Gloria Hernandez, Account Clerk

CONTRACT
$2,099,648.79
$120,000.00
$100,000.00
$200,000.00
$78,948.89
$2,598,597.68

CONTRACT ADJUSTMENTS
CCO#1 MBC financial loss - counted as original contract amount - CCO#2 Reinstall Fence at Peak and Reinstall Waterline at Boisseranc $50,679.93 CCO#3 Demolish & Reapply Additional Plaster at Peak $115,549.47 CCO#4 Waterproofing Pool Gutter at Peak $21,575.93
CCO#5 Replace Electrical Conduits at Peak $12,792.16
CCO#6 Credit for Replacing 3m diving board with 1m diving board -$17,647.58 CCO#7 Replace Corroded Electrical Conduit at Boisseranc $32,489.83 CCO#8 Repair Electrical Conduit in Conflict with Fence Post at Peak $774.66 CCO#9 Install Shut Off Valve and Irrigation Box at Main Line at Peak $814.92 CCO#10 Remove and Replace 4 Light Fixtures at Boisseranc $4,462.13 CCO#11 Install Empty Conduit for Future Phone Line at Boisseranc $7,458.69 CCO#12 Chemical Grout and Repair Pool Shell at Peak $31,463.52 CCO#13 Remove and Dispose Transite Pipe at Peak $5,419.76 CCO#14 Repair Rusted Rebar of Pool Shell at Peak $5,884.26 CCO#15 Skimmer Replacement Parts at Boisseranc $983.43
CCO#16 Replace the Gate Hardwares at Both Parks $16,489.26 CCO#17 Cleaning the Existing Surge Tank at Peak $931.69 CCO#18 Quantity Adjustments -$21,488.11
CCO#19 Outstanding Disputed Items $105,000.00
$373,633.95

CONTRACT EXPENDITURES
$2,471,793.48
-$123,589.67
$2,348,203.81
$121,489.26
-$6,074.46
$115,414.80

PROJECT SUMMARY
$2,219,648.79
$373,633.95
$2,593,282.74
$2,598,597.68
$5,314.94
Percentage Under the Approved Construction Contract Amount 0.2% Total Amount Due This Payment
Original Construction Contract Amount with CCO #1
Total Construction Contract Adjustment
Revised Construction Contract
Approved Construction Contract Amount
Amount Under the Approved Construction Contract Amount
Value of Work Done Previously
Retention Held Previously
Less Previous Payments
Final Payment
Value of Work Done This Period
Retention Held This Period
City Manager Approved Balance Transfer from SCE Account Approved Construction Contract Amount
Contract Change Orders
Total Contract Adjustments
Previous Payments
Appendix "A" - Capital Improvement Project Final Report

PEAK PARK AND BOISSERANC PARK

POOL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Original Construction Contract Amount
Council Approved Change Order (CCO#1) to cover the MBC financial loss Council Approved Construction Contingency Funds #1
Council Approved Construction Contingency Funds #2

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
CSLB Lic. 1050671 A – B
SB – WOSB – DBE – SBE
DIR # 1000064318
Date: 10/31/2024
Project # 265
To: City of Buena Park
6650 Beach Blvd.

Buena Park, CA 90622
AMOUNT
$ (6,074.46)
[42] SUBTOTAL $ 115,414.80
$ -
TOTAL $ 115,414.80
Accepted by:

Signature:

Date:

Thank You For Your Business!
Prepared by: Sandy Assi - [email protected]
Please make check payable to MBC Enterprises Inc.
8631 Universe Avenue
MBC Enterprises, Inc.

Westminster,CA 92683
Retention (5%)
$ 121,489.26
Invoice

DESCRIPTION
Progress gross payment for schedule A from 10/01/2024 to 10/31/2024 - Peak Park & Boisseranc Park Pool Improvements Project
Contractor's Name: Invoice Date: October 31, 2024
Address: Progress Payment No.: 11
City, State, Zip Code: From: 10/01/24 to 10/31/24
Company Phone: Project # 265
PROGRESS PAYMENT SCHEDULE $121,489.26 $1,984,318.31
Sch_A Primary Inspector: $6,074.46 $99,215.92
Project Name: $0.00
Bid Schedule Description: $115,414.80 $1,885,102.39
Item Contract Quantity or % Quantity or % Quantity or % Unit Amount Total Amount No. Description Quantity Unit Previous this Estimate to Date Price this Estimate to Date 1 Mobilization/Demobilization 1 LS 1.00 0.00 1.00 $28,892.36 $0.00 $28,892.36 2 Furnish and install Drain Pool 1 LS 1.00 0.00 1.00 $3,300.86 $0.00 $3,300.86 3 Demolition of Existing Plaster 14500 SF 14398.00 0.00 14398.00 $4.37 $0.00 $62,919.26 4 Demolition of Existing Tiles 1200 SF 1253.00 0.00 1253.00 $4.37 $0.00 $5,475.61 5 Demolition of Existing Deck including but not limited to Existing Shade Structures, Deck Drains, and Other Deck Equipment.
21100 SF 22200.00 0.00 22200.00 $6.01 $0.00 $133,422.00 6 Excavation/Compaction/Soil Preparation 1 LS 1.00 0.00 1.00 $48,430.83 $0.00 $48,430.83 7 Furnish and install New Waterline Tiles including Gutter Cap Tile 620 LF 620.00 0.00 620.00 $80.99 $0.00 $50,213.80 8 Furnish and install New Expansion Joint Tiles (Includes both sides of Expansion Joint) 150 LF 150.00 0.00 150.00 $24.16 $0.00 $3,624.00 9 Furnish and install New Floor Inlet Tile 36 SF 36.00 0.00 36.00 $67.33 $0.00 $2,423.88 10 Furnish and install New No Diving Markers 29 EA 29.00 0.00 29.00 $253.69 $0.00 $7,357.01 11 Furnish and install New Depth Markers 70 EA 70.00 0.00 70.00 $237.51 $0.00 $16,625.70 12 Furnish and install New Ramp Tiles 65 SF 65.00 0.00 65.00 $68.09 $0.00 $4,425.85 13 Furnish and install New Gutter Tiles (Each LF shall include both rows of tiles) 450 LF 450.00 0.00 450.00 $243.30 $0.00 $109,485.00 14 Furnish and install New Water Depth Marker at 4.5 Feet Water Depth 150 LF 150.00 0.00 150.00 $24.16 $0.00 $3,624.00 15 Furnish and install New Stair Tile 110 SF 110.00 0.00 110.00 $64.81 $0.00 $7,129.10 16 Furnish and install New Stair Trim Tile 110 LF 110.00 0.00 110.00 $115.53 $0.00 $12,708.30 17 Furnish and install New Gutter Step Tile 4 SF 4.00 0.00 4.00 $89.52 $0.00 $358.08 18 Furnish and install New Deck 20000 SF 20000.00 0.00 20000.00 $13.66 $0.00 $273,200.00 19 Furnish and install New Drainage System 1 LS 1.00 0.00 1.00 $21,860.00 $0.00 $21,860.00 20 Furnish and install New Pool Shell Waterproofing 14500 SF 0.00 0.00 0.00 $0.55 $0.00 $0.00 21 Furnish and install New Marble Dust White Plaster (1/2" thick) 14500 SF 14500.00 0.00 14500.00 $8.74 $0.00 $126,730.00 22 Furnish and install New Landscape Improvements 1 LS 1.00 0.00 1.00 $16,395.00 $0.00 $16,395.00 23 Furnish and install New Expansion Joint Sealant and Filler 150 LF 150.00 0.00 150.00 $25.14 $0.00 $3,771.00 24 Concrete Shell Repair (Allowance) 1 LS 0.00 0.00 0.00 $20,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 25 Install New Ramp Concrete Structure (Includes Demolition) 1 LS 1.00 0.00 1.00 $65,617.16 $0.00 $65,617.16 26 Furnish and install New Lifeguard Stations 4 EA 4.00 0.00 4.00 $6,461.16 $0.00 $25,844.64 27 Furnish and install New Handrail 4 EA 4.00 0.00 4.00 $1,305.70 $0.00 $5,222.80 28 Furnish and install New Guiderail 4 EA 4.00 0.00 4.00 $2,595.44 $0.00 $10,381.76 29 Furnish and install New ADA Lift 1 EA 1.00 0.00 1.00 $12,895.43 $0.00 $12,895.43 30 Furnish and install New Underwater Lights with Niche 22 EA 22.00 0.00 22.00 $2,520.46 $0.00 $55,450.12 31 Furnish and install New 1-Meter Diving Board 1 EA 1.00 0.00 1.00 $30,801.83 $0.00 $30,801.83 32 Furnish and install New 3-Meter Diving Board 1 EA 1.00 0.00 1.00 $48,449.41 $0.00 $48,449.41 33 Furnish and install New Rope Anchors 20 EA 20.00 0.00 20.00 $945.23 $0.00 $18,904.60 34 Furnish and install main drain covers 3 EA 3.00 0.00 3.00 $1,021.41 $0.00 $3,064.23 34A Renovated field-built main drain sump 1 LS 1.00 0.00 1.00 $28,657.80 $0.00 $28,657.80 35 Furnish and install New Fire Egress Gate 2 EA 2.00 0.00 2.00 $14,700.85 $0.00 $29,401.70 36 Furnish and install New Ramp Handrail 120 LF 120.00 0.00 120.00 $303.09 $0.00 $36,370.80 37 Furnish and install New Floor Inlet and Associated Piping 1 LS 1.00 0.00 1.00 $8,323.52 $0.00 $8,323.52 38 New Gutter Drain and Associated Piping 1 LS 1.00 0.00 1.00 $5,966.58 $0.00 $5,966.58 39 Electrical Installation including Wiring, Conduits, Junction Boxes, etc. 1 LS 1.00 0.00 1.00 $42,627.00 $0.00 $42,627.00 40 Furnish and install new Shade Structures 6 EA 6.00 0.00 6.00 $9,837.00 $0.00 $59,022.00 41 Furnish and install new Shade Structure Lighting 1 LS 1.00 0.00 1.00 $16,395.00 $0.00 $16,395.00 42 Start-up & Adjustment including Pool Filling 1 LS 1.00 0.00 1.00 $9,539.59 $0.00 $9,539.59 43 O&M Manual / Owner Training 1 LS 1.00 0.00 1.00 $905.88 $0.00 $905.88 44 30-Day Maintenance 1 LS 1.00 0.00 1.00 $12,982.76 $0.00 $12,982.76 Change Orders
CO #1 1 LS 1.00 0.00 1.00 $120,000.00 $0.00 $120,000.00 CO #2 Peak Park Remove and Reinstall Fence on East Side & Water Lines at Boisseranc 1 LS 1.00 0.00 1.00 $50,679.93 $0.00 $50,679.93 CO #3 Peak Park Plaster Removal 1 LS 1.00 0.00 1.00 $115,549.47 $0.00 $115,549.47 CO #4 Waterproof Gutters at Peak Park 1 LS 1.00 0.00 1.00 $21,575.93 $0.00 $21,575.93 CO #5 Peak Park Electrical Conduits 1 LS 1.00 0.00 1.00 $12,792.16 $0.00 $12,792.16 CO #6 Credit For Deletion of 3 Meter Diving Board and Addition of 1 Meter Diving Board 1 LS 1.00 0.00 1.00 ($17,647.58) $0.00 ($17,647.58) CO #7 Replace Corroded Electrical Conduit at Boisseranc Park 1 LS 1.00 0.00 1.00 $32,489.83 $0.00 $32,489.83 CO #8 Repair Unforeseen Electrical Conduit Damaged at New Fence Post 1 LS 1.00 0.00 1.00 $774.66 $0.00 $774.66 CO #9 New Irrigation Shut Off Valve and Box at Peak Park 1 LS 1.00 0.00 1.00 $814.92 $0.00 $814.92 CO #10 Remove and Replace 4 Underwater Lights at Boisseranc Park 1 LS 1.00 0.00 1.00 $4,462.13 $0.00 $4,462.13 CO #11 Boisseranc Park Empty 3/4" Phone Line Conduit 1 LS 1.00 0.00 1.00 $7,458.69 $0.00 $7,458.69 CO #12 Pool Shell Repair and Chemical Grouting 1 LS 1.00 0.00 1.00 $31,463.52 $0.00 $31,463.52 CO #13 Peak Park Unforeseen Transite Pipe Removal 1 LS 1.00 0.00 1.00 $5,419.76 $0.00 $5,419.76 CO #14 Peak Park Additional Rusted Rebar 1 LS 1.00 0.00 1.00 $5,884.26 $0.00 $5,884.26 CO #15 Boisseranc Park Skimmer Replacement Parts 1 LS 1.00 0.00 1.00 $983.43 $0.00 $983.43 CO #16 Peak Park and Boisseranc Park Gate Hardware Change 1 LS 0.00 1.00 1.00 $16,489.26 $16,489.26 $16,489.26 CO #17 Peak Park Surge Tank Cleaning 1 LS 1.00 0.00 1.00 $931.69 $0.00 $931.69 CO #19 Final Change Order 1 LS 0.00 1.00 1.00 $105,000.00 $105,000.00 $105,000.00 TOTAL $121,489.26 $1,984,318.31
Peak Park and Boisseranc Park Pool Improvements Project Previous Paid:

Bid Schedule A Buena Park Municipal Pool Total Amount Due:

MBC Enterprises, Inc.
8631 Universe Ave.

Westminster, CA 92683-7725
714-707-6558
Total:

Retention:

Buena Park City Hall
Public Works Department
6650 Beach Blvd, P.O. Box 5009
Buena Park, CA 90622-5009

APPROVAL FOR PROGRESS PAYMENT
Approved By: ________________________________
(Contract Administrator's Name) Date

APPROVAL FOR QUANTITIES
By: _________________________________
CM Firm or Buena Park Inspector Date

APPROVAL FOR QUANTITIES
By: _________________________________
Contractor Date

10/28/2024 10/28/24
City of Buena Park
City Council Regular Meeting Agenda Report
P. FINAL PAYMENT TO M.J. ELLS CONSTRUCTION, INC. FOR THE NAVIGATION CENTER MEN’S SHOWER FLOOR

REHABILITATION PROJECT
Meeting
Tuesday, November 12, 2024, 5:00 PM
Agenda Group
CONSENT CALENDAR Item: 4P.

Presented By
Jason Tran, E.I.T., Assistant Engineer
Prepared By
Mina Mikhael, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
Approved By
Aaron France, City Manager

RECOMMENDED ACTION
1) Accept the project as complete and approve a final payment to M.J. Ells Construction, Inc. in the amount of $6,588.48; and 2) Direct the Public Works Department to file a Notice of Completion.

PREVIOUS CITY COUNCIL ACTION
On July 18, 2024, the City Manager approved a contract with M.J. Ells Construction, Inc. in the amount of $36,324 for the Navigation Center Men’s Shower Flooring Rehabilitation project. On August 29, 2024, the City Manager approved emergency authorization for staff to revise the scope of work in the amount of an additional $95,450.25.

DISCUSSION
The City’s Navigation Center building houses over 150 clients and operates 24/7. The flooring and shower pans in the men’s restroom have experienced significant wear and tear, and needed to be refurbished. After considering several options, staff elected to remove the existing flooring and shower pans and finish the entire shower area with a seamless epoxy finish flooring as opposed to replacing the shower pans as they were previously.

M.J. Ells Construction, Inc.'s scope of work included demolition of the existing flooring and preparation of the subfloor to allow ProCoat Inc. to install the seamless epoxy finish.

Upon demolishing the flooring in the men’s showers at the Navigation Center, the contractor discovered that the sub-floor was saturated with water. The water appeared to have traveled under the flooring between the floor and the sub-floor and spread throughout the men’s restroom beyond the shower area. Staff proceeded to direct the contractor to remove and replace the existing flooring in the rest of the men’s restroom area. Additionally, the men's shower area walls were demolished and replaced with fiberglass-reinforced paneling to prevent water from intruding between the new flooring and the sub-floor.

To facilitate prompt scheduling and timely completion of this project, pursuant to City Council Policy Statement No. 13- Emergency Change Orders, the City Manager authorized both service providers to mobilize and commence work subject to finalizing of the contract documents and reporting back to the City Council as soon as possible thereafter.

The Navigation Center Men’s Shower Floor Rehabilitation Project has been completed. The scope of work performed by M.J. Ells Construction, Inc. included demolition of flooring throughout the men's restroom, demolition of shower area walls, preparation of sub-floor for the seamless epoxy finish, and construction of new fiberreinforced plastic walls in the shower area.

Contract Dates:

Advertisement:             July 8, 2024
Contract Awarded:       July 18, 2024
Notice to Proceed:       August 21, 2024
Work Completed:         October 9, 2024
The contractor has submitted a bill for work completed as of October 9, 2024. All items, quantities, and prices have been checked and found to be in accordance with the contract documents. The final payment is in the amount of $6,588.48. The final contract cost for this project is $131,774.25. This amount is the exact amount of the approved construction project budget of $131,774.25. An analysis of expenditures is listed in Appendix “A” – Capital Improvement Project Final Report.

BUDGET IMPACT
The final cost of M.J. Ells, Inc.'s portion of the work is $131,774.25. This project is funded by the Navigation Center Services account (11-6240-106131).

Attachments
Finance Department Memorandum - Navigation Center Shower.pdf Appendix A - Navigation Center Shower.pdf
Final Invoice Nav Center.pdf

MEMORANDUM
Department of Public Works
DATE: November 12, 2024
TO: Adrian Garcia, Finance Manager
FROM: Mina Mikhael, P.E., Director of Public Works / City Engineer SUBJECT: Stage Stop Building Repair Project
Amount: $6,588.48 Account No.: 11-6240-106131
Purchase Order: 250059
Contractor: M.J. Ells Construction, Inc.
6896 Oran Circle
Buena Park, CA 90621
Date Warrants are to be Mailed: 11/13/2024
RECOMMENDATION:

It is recommended that the Finance Officer issue a warrant for the final payment on this contract.

CERTIFICATION:

This is to certify that the subject project has been completed satisfactorily. The contractor has submitted the final bill for the completed work and is entitled to payment in the amount of 6,588.48 (attached). Bid items, quantities and prices have been checked through this department and are found to be accurate in accordance with the contract documents. A copy of the final report is attached for your file. A “Notice of Completion” will be filed by the Public Works upon approval of the City Council, and following the expiration of the 35-day lien period; the 5% retention will be released to the contractor. Final Payment represents 100% completion to date.

C: Joe Hunt, Public Works Manager
Gloria Hernandez, Account Clerk

CONTRACT
Original Construction Contract Amount $36,324.00

CONTRACT ADJUSTMENTS
Contract Change Orders
1 Additional scope of work $95,450.25
Total Contract Adjustments $95,450.25

CONTRACT EXPENDITURES
Previous Payments
Value of Work Done Previously $118,597.30
Retention Held Previously (10%) $13,176.95
Less Previous Payments $131,774.25
Final Payment
Value of Work Done This Period $6,588.48
Retention Held This Period $0.00
Total Amount Due This Payment $6,588.48
Final Retention (5%) $6,588.47

PROJECT SUMMARY
Original Construction Contract Amount $36,324.00
Total Construction Contract Adjustment $95,450.25
Revised Construction Contract $131,774.25

NAVIGATION CENTER MEN'S SHOWER FLOOR REHABILITATION
Appendix "A" - Project Final Report

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS

City of Buena Park
City Council Regular Meeting Agenda Report
Q. PURCHASE OF A POLICE MOTORCYCLE FROM LONG BEACH BMW AND APPROVE A BUDGET AMENDMENT

FOR THE PURCHASE
Meeting
Tuesday, November 12, 2024, 5:00 PM
Agenda Group
CONSENT CALENDAR Item: 4Q.

Presented By
Joe Hunt, Public Works Manager
Prepared By
Mina Mikhael, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
Approved By
Aaron France, City Manager

RECOMMENDED ACTION
1) Authorize the purchase of one 2024 BMW R1250 Motorcycle in the approximate amount of $39,191.94 from Long Beach BMW Motorcycles utilizing Los Angeles County Sheriff's RFB-IS-23008318-1 dated October 22, 2024; 2) Determine that dispensing with the competitive bidding pursuant to Municipal Code Section 3.28.080(E) is in the best interest of the City because it will result in a lower purchase price for this vehicle; and, 3) Approve a budget amendment in the amount of $39,200 from the undesignated Vehicle Replacement Fund balance for the purchase.

PREVIOUS CITY COUNCIL ACTION
None.

DISCUSSION
The City operates a fleet of four BMW motorcycles and four older Honda motorcycles for use by motorcycle officers in the Police Department. Five of the motorcycles are used daily, two are kept as reserves, and one is used for training purposes. In September, one of the BMW motorcycles was totaled in an accident. Now this leaves the City with one reserve motorcycle should any of the other units be damaged or need to be offline for service.

The City's vendors have indicated that BMW is not yet taking orders for 2025 motorcycles. However, the City previously waited 10 months for delivery of a 2024 BMW motorcycle, which are no longer available to be ordered.

Wait times are anticipated to be 10-15 months once orders for 2025 units open.

Long Beach BMW Motorcycles recently offered the City a 2024 BMW Motorcycle that had originally been ordered for the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department. Staff recommends authorizing purchase of this motorcycle to replace the totaled motorcycle.

Municipal Code Section 3.28.080(E) allows the City to "piggyback" off of cooperative purchasing agreements if it is in the best interest of the City. Some of the benefits of using a cooperative purchasing agreement include reduction of administrative costs associated with with issuing a competitive solicitation and product cost savings based on economies of scale.

This procedure has been reviewed and approved by the City's Purchasing Manager.

BUDGET IMPACT
The 2024 BMW R1250 costs $39,191.94. This purchase was not included in the current fiscal year budget. Staff recommends a budget amendment in the amount of $39,200 from undesignated Vehicle Replacement Fund balance for this purchase.

Attachments
2024 BMW Quote.pdf

City of Buena Park
City Council Regular Meeting Agenda Report
A. EXCLUSIVE NEGOTIATING AGREEMENT WITH BOARDWALK ENTERPRISES, LLC FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 7711-7733 BEACH BOULEVARD
Consideration of a 9-month Exclusive Negotiating Agreement (ENA) with Boardwalk Enterprises, LLC for the development of the property at 7711-7733 Beach Boulevard with a multi-attraction development.

Meeting
Tuesday, November 12, 2024, 5:00 PM
Agenda Group
NEW BUSINESS Item: 5A.

Presented By
Matt Foulkes, Director of Community and Economic
Development
Prepared By
Matt Foulkes, Director of Community and Economic
Development
Approved By
Aaron France, City Manager

RECOMMENDED ACTION
1) Approve an Exclusive Negotiating Agreement (ENA) with Boardwalk Enterprises, LLC to perform initial design, feasibility, environmental analysis and other due diligence as part of the future disposition of the City-owned property at 7711-7733 Beach Boulevard for a multi-attraction entertainment venue, including a butterfly conservatory, aquarium, laser maze, surprise your eyes, 4-D theater, cafe, and candy shop development.

PREVIOUS CITY COUNCIL ACTION
The City Council has received multiple presentations regarding the subject property, most recently in September 2024.

DISCUSSION
The City reacquired the 8.77-acre property at 7711-7733 Beach Boulevard in 2022, after several years of negotiations with the prior owner. Following acquisition, the City released a Request for Proposals (RFP) to seek developers interested in developing the site with entertainment, tourist attraction and hospitality uses. The top six developers presented their project concepts to the City Council in October 2022, after which the City Council narrowed down the candidates to a top three.

Based on the site visits and due diligence, in September 2023, the City Council selected Adrenaline Sports Resorts, LLC to explore the feasibility of developing the site with a surf park, hotel, restaurant, and retail concept.

Unfortunately, over the course of the ENA period, the developer made nominal progress on their proposal, and the parties have mutually agreed to terminate further discussions.

As a result, City staff has recently reached out to Buena Park Boardwalk - another developer that had placed in the “top three” of the City’s RFP process and whose proposal had been viewed extremely favorably by both the City Council and staff during the initial review. During these renewed discussions, the Buena Park Boardwalk team has reiterated its strong interest in the project site and has strengthened its initial development proposal by replacing the dinosaur exhibit and restaurant elements of the design with an aquarium concept similar to what is at their current facility in Scottsdale, Arizona. Given their continued strong interest in Buena Park, demonstrated track record of successfully completing a similar project and improved project proposal, staff is recommending that the City enter into an Exclusive Negotiating Agreement with Boardwalk Enterprises, LLC to explore the feasibility of the development at the subject property.

The proposed Exclusive Negotiating Agreement is attached for the City Council’s consideration, and if approved, would result in the City and developer entering an expedited nine-month period of formal exclusive negotiation to finalize the site design, start preparation of the required land use entitlements, prepare the appropriate agreements for the sale of the property, and conduct the required environmental analysis. The ENA is structured for a two-step negotiation period with an initial period of of six-months for the completion of the majority of the milestones. If all of the six-month milestones are completed, the ENA will extend for an additional three-months for completion of milestones pertaining to the aquarium portion of the project, which requires additional time to prepare. The City has made the Boardwalk Enterprises, LLC team aware of the condensed ENA period and the strong desire from the City and the community to see development commence on this property. The developer has indicated to staff that they have the capacity and intention to move quickly on this project and are not concerned about meeting the development milestones identified in the ENA.

Pursuant to the terms of the ENA, the costs associated with the completion of the milestones outlined are paid for by the developer. If all of the milestones set forth in the ENA are completed within the exclusive negotiation period, the City would move to the next phase of the project, which would be preparation of the applicable disposition documents for the property. The proposed transaction and applicable agreements would be subject to the City Council’s review and discretionary consideration at a future public meeting. If the developer fails to complete the milestones referenced, or if at the end of the negotiation period an amenable deal cannot be reached between the parties, the ENA will automatically expire, and the City would be free to pursue negotiations with the other interested parties.

BUDGET IMPACT
There is no budget impact associated with this request.

Attachments
Draft Exclusive Negotiating Agreement_Buena Park Enterprises, LLC.pdf

EXCLUSIVE NEGOTIATING AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN

THE CITY OF BUENA PARK
AND

BOARDWALK ENTERPRISES, LLC
This EXCLUSIVE NEGOTIATING AGREEMENT (“Agreement”) is entered into this 13th day of January 2025 (“Effective Date”), by and between the CITY OF BUENA PARK, a California municipal corporation (“City”), and BOARDWALK ENTERPRISES, LLC (“Developer”), with reference to the following facts and subject to terms and provisions set forth below. City and Developer may sometimes be referred to herein individually as “Party” and jointly as the “Parties”.

RECITALS
(A) City is owner of that certain real property located at 7711-7733 Beach Boulevard, Buena Park, California (APNs 136-203-40, 136-211-57 and 136-211-64), as such real property is legal described in Exhibit “A” hereto (the “Property”), and City has an interest in facilitating the Property’s development and use in the manner contemplated by the City of Buena Park Entertainment Corridor Specific Plan (“ECSP”).
(B) Developer has an interest in acquiring the Property for purpose of development and use in the manner described in Developer’s written proposal attached hereto as Exhibit “B” (the “Proposal”), and the Parties desire to enter into an exclusive negotiating period to explore the feasibility and potential terms and conditions by which Developer might acquire the Property from City for such purpose.

NOW THEREFORE, based on the foregoing recitals and for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:

AGREEMENT
I. RECITALS INCORPORATED.

The foregoing recitals are true, correct, and incorporated a substantive part of this Agreement:

II. SCOPE OF AGREEMENT
(A) For the duration of the Total Negotiation Period (defined in Section III), City and Developer agree to and shall, on an exclusive basis and in good faith, engaging in negotiations towards reaching an agreement on the following matters, in addition to such other matters as either Party deems reasonably necessary:
(1) An agreement on all material terms of a purchase and sale agreement, development and disposition agreement, long-term lease and development agreement, or similar agreement(s) (“Transaction Agreement”) to facilitate the City’s sale or disposition of the Property to Developer, Developer’s acquisition of the Property from the City, and Developer’s development and use of the Property in the manner substantially consistent with that described in the Proposal (the “Project”). The Transaction Agreement shall include but is not limited to the sales or acquisition price, lease rental terms, escrow terms and conditions, related transaction terms, a schedule of performance, development covenants and controls, and land use covenants and restrictions.

Page | 2 of 8
(2) An agreement as to the scope of environmental review that may be required to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") for development and operation of the Project on the Property, provided that the Parties agree City will act as lead agency for any “project” and the scope of environmental review will be decided based on the independent judgment of the City.
(3) An agreement as to the entitlements, land use authorizations, and other discretionary approvals or actions required by the City to develop and operate the Project on the Property with reference to applicable land use plans and zoning codes (“City Approvals”); together with an agreement as to any other approvals, consents, or permits that may be required of other governmental agencies or private parties to implement the Project. (4) An agreement on all ancillary agreements or approvals that will be needed to effectuate the Project, including without limitation, conditions, covenants & restrictions, reciprocal easement agreements, encroachment permits, and right of entry agreements. (5) An agreement on a schedule by which the City will review and take final action on each of the City Approvals.
(6) An agreement on the rights and remedies of the parties in the event of a material breach of the Transaction Agreement or City Approvals. (B) Nothing in this Agreement shall be deemed a covenant, promise, or commitment by either Party with respect to the acquisition or disposition of the Property or any other real property owned by the City, the approval of the Developer’s Proposal, the Project, or any other development, or the terms of any agreement with Developer other than this Agreement. The City and Party's acceptance of this Agreement is merely an agreement to enter into a period of exclusive negotiations according to the terms herein, reserving final discretion and approval by each Party as to any actions required of it to provide with sale and/or development of the Property. (C) For the duration of the Total Negotiation Period (defined in Section III), Developer shall not enter into negotiations with, apply for, or otherwise pursue a development with any other third-party (including but not limited to governmental entities) that is located within 50 miles of the Property and is substantially similar to the Developer’s Proposal.

III. NEGOTIATION PERIOD
City and Developer agree to negotiate the Butterfly Wonderland portion of the Project for an initial period of six-months ("Initial Negotiation Period"), commencing upon the Effective Date of this Agreement. Additionally, City and Developer agree to negotiate for a second period of threemonths ("Second Negotiation Period"), commencing upon the expiration of the Initial Negotiation Period for the OdySea Aquarium portion of the Project. The Initial Negotiation Period and/or Second Negotiation Period shall be automatically extended for an additional 30 days upon Developer’s completion of the First and Second Negotiation Milestones described in Section lV to the reasonable satisfaction of City (“Total Negotiation Period”). In the event Developer does not complete the First Negotiation Milestones within the Initial Negotiation Period, then this Agreement shall automatically expire and be of no further force and effect and with Developer having no further rights regarding the subject matter of this Agreement or the Property, and City being free to negotiate with any other persons or entities concerning the Property. In the event Developer completes the First Negotiation Milestones, this Agreement shall automatically extend an additional 3-months for the Developer to complete the Second Negotiation Milestones. The Page | 3 of 8
City Manager may, in the exercise of his/her sole discretion, extend the Initial or Second Negotiating Period for up to 30 days to provide Developer time to complete the First or Second Negotiation Milestones, with any longer extensions or either period requiring the discretionary approval of the City Council. Any such extensions shall require mutual written approval of the Parties.

IV. OBLIGATIONS OF DEVELOPER
During the Initial Negotiation Period, the Developer shall complete the following tasks and actions specifically for the Butterfly Wonderland (the “First Negotiation Milestones”):
(A) Prepare and submit for City’s review development plans for the Project, including but not limited to a site plan, conceptual floor plans, elevations and conceptual landscape plans in the standard form required by the City (“Development Plans”); (B) Prepare and submit for City’s review a description and narrative of the Project that is adequate in scope and detail to assess the type of environmental analysis that will be required for the Project and, if applicable, enter into a reimbursement agreement with the City for costs associated with the required environmental analysis; (C) Submit all required documentation to secure an Access Agreement with the City to access the property for any site investigation and testing that may be required; (D) Prepare and submit a preliminary financial feasibility analysis for the Project to the City for review, including a proforma showing Property acquisition costs, construction costs, and other hard and soft costs necessary to purchase the Property and develop it with the Project (“Project Budget”), together with anticipated operating costs / revenues for the first three years of operations;
(E) Prepare and submit all required land-use entitlement applications, including a statutory development agreement and any other Project-specific entitlements based on the proposed development plan and standards in the Buena Park Entertainment Corridor Specific Plan;
(F) Provide a narrative with supporting documentation (such as account statements, letters of intent, or similar commitments) of Developer’s capacity to finance all costs identified in the Project Budget, including identification of all funding sources anticipated to be utilized by Developer; a narrative of the construction phase of the project including timelines for completion and sourcing of necessary workers;
(G) Otherwise negotiate and work with City in good faith efforts to reach an agreement on a Transaction Agreement.

During the Second Negotiation Period, the Developer shall complete the following tasks and actions specifically for the OdySea Aquarium (the “Second Negotiation Milestones”):
(A) Prepare and submit for City’s review conceptual Floor Plans for the OdySea Aquarium; Page | 4 of 8
(B) Prepare and submit a preliminary Project Budget for the OdySea Aquarium component, together with anticipated operating costs / revenues for the first three years of operations; (C) Otherwise negotiate and work with City in good faith efforts to reach an agreement on a Transaction Agreement.

V. OBLIGATIONS OF CITY.

During the Total Negotiation Period, City shall use its good faith efforts to:
(A) Negotiate exclusively through its staff and contract exclusively with Developer in connection with the disposition, acquisition, and development of the Property; (B) Review the Development Plans and determine consistency with the General Plan, applicable Specific Plans, Buena Park Municipal Code, and other relevant land use regulations applicable to the Property and Project;
(C) Provide Developer with all documents in the City's possession relating to the Property that would be relevant to and assist Developer in conducting due diligence on the Property and development of the Project thereon;
(D) Assist in the identification of existing deficiencies in the public infrastructure in the vicinity of the Property, the actual fiscal impacts of the development on municipal services, and the financial and other assistance that may be available from the City to address the same; (E) Identify the necessary steps that will be undertaken to process and cause the Property to accommodate the development;
(F) Respond on a timely basis to all submittals by Developer made pursuant to this Agreement;
(G) Work with Developer to establish a reasonable time schedule, consistent with the terms of this Agreement, for negotiation of an agreement described in Section II(A)(1) and the completion of all necessary approvals and permits to implement the development of the Property; (H) Provide reasonable cooperative assistance to Developer in preparation for and during any presentation before regulatory or advisory panels in connection with any applications for land use permits, and/or design review, which may be required; provided that such cooperation by City staff shall not in any way pre-commit the City to any decision or course of action relative to the proposed development of the Property; and
(I) Otherwise negotiate and work with Developer in good faith efforts to reach an agreement on a Transaction Agreement.

VI. RESTRICTIONS AGAINST CHANGE IN OWNERSHIP, MANAGEMENT, PROJECT SCOPE AND/OR CONTROL OF DEVELOPER AND ASSIGNMENT.

The qualifications and identity of Developer and its principals are of particular concern to City and it is because of these qualifications and identity that City has entered into this Agreement with Developer.

Page | 5 of 8
(A) During the Total Negotiation Period, no voluntary or involuntary successor-in interest of Developer shall acquire any rights or powers under this Agreement, except for an affiliate of the Developer in which the main members of the Developer remain the same.

Developer shall not assign all or any part of this Agreement or any rights in or under this Agreement without the prior written approval of City, which approval may be given or withheld in City's sole and absolute discretion. Any assignment without prior City approval shall be void, and City shall have the right to terminate this Agreement without liability by sending written notice of termination to the Developer.
(B) Developer shall promptly notify City in writing of any and all changes whatsoever in the identity of the business entities or individuals either comprising of, or in control of Developer, as well as any and all changes in the interest of the degree of control of Developer by any such entities or individuals, of which information Developer or any of its members, partners, or officers are notified or may otherwise have knowledge or information. Upon the occurrence of any change, whether voluntary or involuntary, in membership, ownership, management, or control of Developer (other than any such change that is occasioned by the death or incapacity of any individual) that has not been approved by City, City may terminate this Agreement without liability by sending written notice of termination to the Developer referencing this section. (C) Developer shall promptly notify City in writing of any changes to the scope of the Project which deviates in a material way from the proposal provided as Exhibit B. Any material change to the Project must approved by the City. The City may terminate this Agreement without liability by sending written notice of termination to the Developer referencing this section.

VII. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS AND RESERVATIONS
(A) The City and Developer agree that, if this Agreement expires or is terminated for any reason, or a future Transaction Agreement is not executed by both City and Developer, for any reason, neither the City nor Developer shall be under any further obligation to each other regarding the disposition or development of the Property. (B) Developer acknowledges and agrees that no provision of this Agreement shall be deemed to be either an offer by City, or an acceptance by City of any offer or proposal from Developer, to convey any interest in the Property, or for City to provide any financial or other assistance to Developer for development of the Property. (C) Developer acknowledges and agrees that neither the Developer nor any affiliate of the Developer has acquired, nor will acquire, by virtue of the terms of this Agreement, any legal or equitable interest in real or personal property from City.

VIII. DEAFULT AND REMEDIES
(A) Limitation on Remedies for Breach. The Parties acknowledge and agree that neither City nor Developer would have entered into this Agreement if either Party were to be liable to the other for monetary damages or other remedies, other than as stated in this Agreement.

Accordingly, City and Developer each acknowledge and agree that their respective sole and exclusive right and remedy upon the breach of this Agreement by the other Party is to terminate this Agreement and any other remedy under this Agreement without any other cost, expense, or liability to either Party (except with respect to the Deposit) or the terms of this Agreement that survive its termination.

Page | 6 of 8
(B) Release of Claims. Each Party acknowledges that it is aware of the meaning and legal effect of California Civil Code Section 1542, which provides:

A general release does not extend to claims that the creditor or releasing party does not know or suspect to exist in his or her favor at the time of executing the release and that if known by him or her, would have materially affected his or her settlement with the debtor or released party.

California Civil Code Section 1542 notwithstanding, it is the intention of both City and Developer to be bound by the limitations on damages and remedies set forth in this Section, and City and Developer hereby release any and all other claims against each other for monetary damages or other legal or equitable relief related to any breach of this Agreement, whether or not any such released claims were known or unknown to either City or Developer as of the date of this Agreement. City and Developer each waive the benefits of California Civil Code Section 1542 and all other statutes and judicial decisions (whether state or federal) of similar effect with regard to the limitations on damages and remedies.
_________ City Initials ____________ Developer Initials (C) Default; Right to Terminate. Failure or delay by either Party to timely perform any material term or provision of this Agreement shall constitute a default under this Agreement. If the Party who is claimed to be in default by the other Party commences to cure, correct, or remedy the alleged default within thirty (30) calendar days after receipt of written notice specifying such default and thereafter diligently completes such cure, correction, or remedy, such Party shall not be in default under this Agreement. If the Party in default fails to commence to cure the default within thirty (30) calendar days following written notice thereof and thereafter diligently prosecutes such cure to completion, a "breach" of this Agreement by the defaulting party shall have occurred.

However, in the event the City is the defaulting party, the cure period shall be added to the Total Negotiation Period at the Developer’s discretion. Upon a breach of this Agreement, the sole and exclusive remedy of the Party who is not in default shall be to terminate this Agreement by serving written notice thereof to the Party in breach. The Party claiming that a default has occurred shall give written notice of default to the Party claimed to be in default, specifying the alleged default.

Delay in giving such notice shall not constitute a waiver of any default nor shall it change the time of default. However, the injured Party shall have no right to exercise any remedy for a default under this Agreement without first delivering written notice of the default. In no event shall the City's disapproval of the Project, Development Plans, Transaction Agreement, CEQA review, any City Approvals, or any other entitlements for the Property or Project, or the City's disapproval or conditional approval of any other matters that require the City's discretionary approval pursuant to this Agreement or applicable law, constitute a breach of or default under this Agreement.

Additionally, in no event shall the Developer or City’s decision to no longer proceed with the Project following the Initial Negotiation Period constitute a breach of or default under this Agreement.

IX. MISCELLANEOUS
(A) Nondiscrimination. Developer shall not discriminate against nor segregate any person, or group of persons on account of race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, handicap, national origin or ancestry in undertaking its obligations under this Agreement. (B) Authorized Expenses. Except as otherwise agreed to by City in writing prior to costs or expenses being incurred or as otherwise stated in this Agreement, City shall have no Page | 7 of 8
obligation to pay or reimburse the Developer for any costs or expenses incurred as a result of this Agreement, the preparation and submittal of the Development Plan, the negotiation of a Transaction Agreement, the retention of any consultant, the development of the Property, or any other matter concerning the Property.
(C) Compliance with Law. Developer acknowledges that any future Transaction Agreement, if approved by City, will require Developer (among other things) to carry out the development of the Property in conformity with all applicable laws, including all applicable building, planning, and zoning laws, environmental laws, safety laws and federal and state labor and wage laws.
(D) Reservation of City Discretion. No Transaction Agreement between City and Developer shall have any force or effect, nor shall City be deemed to be a party to any agreement for the acquisition of or disposition of real or personal property, until the terms and conditions of any future agreement are considered and approved by the governing body of the City, in the City governing body's sole and absolute discretion, following the conclusion of a duly noticed public hearing, as may be required by law. Developer expressly acknowledges and agrees that the City will not be bound by any statement, promise, or representation made by City staff, consultants, or board or commission members during the course of negotiations of any agreement, and that City shall only be legally bound upon the approval of any agreement by the governing body, in City governing body's sole and absolute discretion, following a duly noticed public hearing, as required by law.
(E) No Third-Party Beneficiaries. None of the terms or provisions of this Agreement are intended to benefit any person or entity other than City and Developer. No affiliate of Developer has any rights pursuant to this Agreement.
(F) Governing Law. City and Developer acknowledge and agree that this Agreement concerns real property that is located in the City of Buena Park, County of Orange, State of California. The City and Developer agree that this Agreement shall be governed by, interpreted under, and construed and enforced in accordance with the internal laws of the State of California, without application of conflicts of law principles.
(G) Partial Invalidity. If any term or provision set forth in this Agreement or the application thereof to any Party or circumstance shall, to any extent, be invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this Agreement, or the application of such term or provision or portion thereof to the Parties or circumstances other than those as to which it is held invalid or unenforceable, shall not be affected thereby, and each such term and provision of this Agreement shall be valid and enforced to the fullest extent permitted by law.
(H) Waiver. No waiver of any breach of any covenant, term or provision contained in this Agreement shall be deemed a waiver of any preceding or succeeding breach or such provision, or of any other covenant or provision contained in this Agreement. No extension of the time for performance of any obligation, or act or any waiver of any provision of this Agreement, shall be enforceable against City or Developer unless made in writing and executed by both City and Developer.
(I) Construction. Headings at the beginning of each Section and Subsection of this Agreement are solely for the convenience of reference of the Parties and are not a part of this Agreement. Whenever required by the context of this Agreement, the singular shall include the plural and the masculine shall include the feminine and vice versa. This Agreement shall not be Page | 8 of 8
construed as if it had been prepared by one or the other of City or Developer, but rather as if both City and Developer prepared this Agreement. Unless otherwise indicated, all references to Sections are to this Agreement. All exhibits referred to in this Agreement are either attached to this Agreement or incorporated into this Agreement by reference. If the last date by which City or Developer is required to take any action pursuant to the terms of this Agreement is not a business day, the deadline for taking such action shall be extended until the next succeeding business day. (J) Notices. All notices under this Agreement shall be effective upon delivery to the respective Parties as follows, or such other address or addresses as the Parties may from time to time designate in writing:

CITY: DEVELOPER:

City of Buena Park ________________________
Attn: Aaron France, City Manager Attn: ____________________ 6650 Beach Boulevard ________________________
Buena Park, CA 90622-5009 ________________________
(K) Time of the Essence. Time is of the essence in this Agreement and of each and every term and provision hereof, it being understood that the Parties hereto have specifically negotiated the dates or time limits for the completion of each obligation herein. (L) Duplicate Originals; Counterparts and Copies. This Agreement may be executed in any number of duplicate originals, all of which shall be of equal legal force and effect. The Parties may execute this Agreement in two (2) or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which taken together shall constitute one and the same instrument.

The Parties specifically agree that facsimile or electronic signatures on this Agreement shall be legally binding and that each Party is entitled and authorized to rely on the facsimile or electronic signature of the other hereon as if it were an original signature and that a fully-signed copy of this Agreement shall be just as valid and effective as if it was an original. (M) Entire Agreement. This Agreement sets forth the entire agreement between the Parties with respect to the subject matter set forth herein and supersedes all prior discussions and negotiations between the· Parties with respect thereto. No amendment to this Agreement shall be effective unless set forth in a writing signed by an authorized signatory of each Party.

WHEREFORE, the Parties have executed this Agreement as of the date first written above.
“CITY”

CITY OF BUENA PARK
By: _______________________________
Aaron France, City Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
“DEVELOPER”
Page | 9 of 8
__________________________________
__________________________________
______________________
Christopher Cardinale
City Attorney
By: _______________________________

[Title]
City of Buena Park
City Council Regular Meeting Agenda Report
B. RESOLUTION TO CREATE A NEW PREFERENTIAL PARKING DISTRICT ON BRENNER AVENUE AND MELROSE STREET
Meeting
Tuesday, November 12, 2024, 5:00 PM
Agenda Group
NEW BUSINESS Item: 5B.

Presented By
Norm Wray, Senior Engineering Technician
Prepared By
Mina Mikhael, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
Approved By
Aaron France, City Manager

RECOMMENDED ACTION
1) Adopt a resolution to establish a new Preferential Parking District (PPD) on Brenner Avenue.

PREVIOUS CITY COUNCIL ACTION
On October 22, 2024, residents from Brenner Avenue presented the City Council with a petition to establish a new PPD on Brenner Avenue. The City Council directed staff to bypass the Traffic Commission review of the request and bring a staff report on the item for review at the November 12th City Council Meeting.

DISCUSSION
The residents of Brenner Avenue have expressed frustration over recent increases in parking demand on their street. They stated that the recent increases in parking demand have come primarily due to the new Hilton Hotel located at 6979 Brenner Avenue. Per the residents, both hotel staff and hotel guests frequently park on Brenner Avenue. In addition to simply taking parking spaces, residents state that drivers have removed their trashcans from the street (leading to garbage not being collected), vehicles have parked in front of and blocking driveways, and many vehicles ignore street sweeping signs.

The zoning and  land use in the area around Brenner Avenue varies. Zoning in this area includes BeachOrangethorpe Mixed-Use Specific Plan (BOMUSP), Single-Family Residential (RS-6), Commercial General (CG), Mixed-Use Overlay-45 (MUO-45), and Multi-Family Residential (RM-20). The BOMUSP is a unique zoning that allows a variety of types of use, including office, retail, restaurant, housing, and hotel, all in a small area designed to give the feel of a walkable downtown community. The development located at this intersection within the BOMUSP zoned parcels is The Source OC (The Source). Commercial General (CG) and Mixed-Use Overlay-45 (MUO-45) allows a variety of land uses that are neighborhood-serving commercial uses. See Attachment 2 for a map of the zoning in the area.

Brenner Avenue is a local residential street that is divided by a striped double yellow line along The Source. North of The Source the street is undivided. It has a prima facie speed limit of 25 miles-per-hour (MPH). Along The Source, on-street parking is allowed only on the east side of the street.  North of The Source, parking is allowed on both sides of the street. At the north end of the street, Brenner Avenue makes a 90 degree turn to the west and turns into Melrose Street.

Residents submitted an application per City Council Policy No. 41. The application received was complete, and staff has reviewed the request per the policy. The City's PPD policy has two basic requirements. The request must be made by at least 2/3 (66.6%) of the residents on the street and the area must be reasonably self-contained. In this case, 92.3% of the residents in the area signed the petition, meeting the first part of the policy requirement. See Attachment 3 for a map of the voting results.

The requirement for an area to be self-contained is more difficult to determine, and is done on a case-by-case basis. In this case, two factors were considered:

Firstly, staff would typically not recommend a PPD that is on only one side of a street. However, this has been done in the past when one side of the street is residential and the other primarily commercial. In PPD No. 10, the north side of Azalea Drive along the RS-6 properties is within a PPD, but the south side of the street along the Pirates Dinner Adventure (a commercially-zoned property) is not within the PPD. Staff believes that the same sort of allowance could be made on Brenner Avenue, where a PPD would only be along the residential properties. If approved in this manner, the PPD would be on the east side of Brenner Avenue, beginning at 6980 Brenner Avenue, continuing northerly to Melrose Street. The PPD would be on the west side of Brenner Avenue only on the frontage of 7872 Melrose Street.

Secondly, staff reviewed the adjacent street (Melrose Street) to determine if it would be negatively impacted by the proposed PPD. Staff believes that if a PPD were approved on Brenner Avenue only, any overflow parking from The Source properties would be easily able to park around the corner on Melrose Street. As such, staff does not believe that the requested PPD is a self-contained area.

See attachment 4 for a map of the proposed PPD.

In addition to the two requirements of the policy, there is also a recommendation related to parking demand. The recommendation is that at least 75% of the available parking is in use during peak times. To review this, staff first determined the approximate number of vehicles that could legally be stored on the street. Staff then conducted multiple day-time and night-time parking observations to determine the number of parked vehicles. This enabled staff to determine the average parking demand in the area. Complete count data is available in Attachment 5; the average peak parking demand was 57%. The highest observed was 62%.

The request does not meet the minimum requirements of Policy No. 41 as it is not a self-contained area. However, in previous requests, the City Council has approved an area that was not self-contained with the provision that additional streets could be added into the PPD at a later date. If Brenner Avenue is approved to be a PPD, Melrose Street could join the PPD later by completing the normal request process.

BUDGET IMPACT
If the proposed PPD No. 13 is approved, the cost to install the necessary signs would be approximately $1,200 to $1,500.  Staff would also need to purchase additional parking permits. The cost for these would be approximately $300 to $500. The cost for the signs would be funded by the existing Signing and Striping budget. The cost for the permits could be funded by the existing Public Works – Operations budget.

Attachments
Permit Parking on Brenner - Att 1 of 6 - Reso.pdf
Permit Parking on Brenner - Att 2 of 6 - Vicinity Map.pdf Permit Parking on Brenner - Att 3 of 6 - Zoning Map.pdf Permit Parking on Brenner - Att 4 of 6 - Vote Map.pdf
Permit Parking on Brenner - Att 5 of 6 - Proposed PPD Map.pdf Permit Parking on Brenner - Att 6 of 6 - Parking Counts.pdf RESOLUTION NO.________

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF BUENA PARK, CALIFORNIA,

ESTABLISHING A PREFERENTIAL PARKING DISTRICT ON

BRENNER AVENUE, ALL AS MORE PARTICULARLY

DESCRIBED HEREIN
WHEREAS, the City of Buena Park (“City”) has received a request from over 2/3 of the residents within the subject area for the designation of this street as a preferential parking district; and
WHEREAS, the City has jurisdiction over the subject street; and WHEREAS, California Vehicle Code Section 22507 authorizes the City to establish Preferential Parking Districts.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BUENA PARK hereby determines, finds, and resolves as follows:

Section 1. In accordance with California Vehicle Code Section 22507, the City Council hereby establishes a preferential parking district consisting of the east side of Brenner Avenue, beginning at the extension of the southerly property line of 6980 Brenner Avenue, thence northerly to the extension of the westerly property line of 6832 Brenner Avenue, and the west side of Brenner Avenue beginning from the northerly extension of the property line at 7872 Melrose Street thence southerly to the easterly extension of the property line of 7872 Melrose Street, as shown in the attached map, which district shall be referred to as “Preferential Parking District No.

13.”
Section 2. Residential parking permits for Preferential Parking District No. 13 shall be individually numbered and otherwise in such form as approved by the Director of Public Works.

The residential parking permits for Preferential Parking District No. 13 shall comply with the following guidelines:
a. The residential parking permits shall be divided into two types:
i. Resident/visitor. A permit for exclusive use of residents and their guests. ii. Temporary (one-day). A permit that is issued to residents of the district for special occasions in which a resident may require additional permits.

There is no maximum number of temporary permits that are available in one year. These permits shall only be valid for the date specified on the permit.
b. All resident/visitor permits shall be issued by the Department of Public Works; all temporary permits shall be issued by the Police Department. Said departments shall maintain all records as necessary to issue and track permits.

RESOLUTION NO. _______

c. Any residence within the boundaries of Preferential Parking District No. 13 may purchase up to two resident/visitor permits. These permits shall be subject to a purchasing or replacement fee of ten dollars ($10) per permit. These permits shall be renewed biennially. Notwithstanding the foregoing, more than two resident/visitor permits may be approved by the Director of Public Works at his or her discretion for specific vehicles parked at a residence in a district including those providing temporary services or activities to these residences such as maintenance, construction, or healthcare. These additional resident/visitor permits must be requested by the resident, in writing, and must be justified to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. The permitted use or service being provided must be consistent with the use of the property and in conformance with the Buena Park Municipal Code. The additional permits shall be subject to a purchasing or replacement fee of twenty dollars ($20) per permit. These permits shall be renewed biennially.
d. The fee for temporary permits shall be one dollar ($1) per permit. Each temporary permit shall be valid for one day only as written on the permits. When writing the date of use on the temporary permits, residents shall use indelible ink only. e. To obtain a resident/visitor or temporary permit, the resident must bring proof of residency on the affected portion of this district to the Department that issues the permits.
f. Each parking permit issued pursuant to this Resolution may only be used within Preferential Parking District No. 13. No resident/visitor parking permit may be sold, conveyed, or otherwise permanently transferred.

Section 3. This Resolution shall not take effect unless and until signs or markings as described in California Vehicle Code Section 22507 (a) are installed in the areas affected by this Resolution.

Section 4. CEQA. This Resolution is exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 (b)(3), which is the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment, and CEQA does not apply where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity may have a significant effect on the environment.

Section 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 12th day of November, 2024, by the following called vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

RESOLUTION NO. _______

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:
_________________________________________
Mayor
ATTEST:
_______________________________
City Clerk
I, Adria M. Jimenez, MMC, City Clerk, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Buena Park held this 12th day of November, 2024.
______________________________________
City Clerk

ORANGETHORPE AVE BEACH BLVD STANTON AVE BRENNER AVE

MELROSE ST

AFFECTED AREA

ORANGETHORPE AVE BEACH BLVD

MELROSE ST BRENNER AVE
19 UNIT APARTMENT COMPLEX
7761
7761
7761
7761
7761
7761
7761
7761 7761 7761 7761
7761
7761
7761
7761
7761
7761
7761 7761
7712
7821
69406940
7814
7814
7821
7740
6801
6771
6771
6771
6771
6771
6771
6771
6771
6771
6771
6762
6762
7781
7822
6751
7862
7800
7802 7812 7832 7842
7872
6871
6861
6851
7911
6861
6911
7921
7801
6950
6940
6940
6801
6771
7762
6840
6832
6851
6821
6841
6892
7861
6772 7761
6762
6795
6781
6761
7902 7912 7926 6751 7872
6890
6971
7912 7960
6979
7712
7692 7702
6901
7772 7782 7792 7802 7812 7832 7842 7852
6866
6854
6842
6800 6832
7851
7841
7831
7821
7801 7811
6980
6970
6960
6950
6932
6912
6902
6801
6791
6781
6771
6761
6741
6731
7657
6812 7761 7771 7791
7786
7772
: INDICATES A PROPERTY THAT SIGNED THE PETITION IN FAVOR OF THE PPD (12 OF 13, 92.3%) : INDICATES A PROPERTY THAT DID NOT SIGN THE PETITION IN FAVOR OF THE PPD (1 OF 13, 7.7%) NOTES:

THERE ARE 14 PROPERTIES ON THE EAST SIDE
OF BRENNER AVENUE, BUT ONLY 12 ARE
RESIDENTIALLY ZONED, SO ONLY 12 ARE BEING
COUNTED FOR THE PURPOSE OF THIS REVIEW.

ORANGETHORPE AVE BEACH BLVD

MELROSE ST BRENNER AVE
19 UNIT APARTMENT COMPLEX
: INDICATES THE LIMITS OF THE PROPOSED PPD
: INDICATES A PROPERTY THAT WOULD BE WITHIN THE PROPOSED PPD Observer:

Date Time Day of
Week
10/21/24 7:00 AM Monday
10/22/24 7:10 AM Tuesday
10/23/24 9:32 PM Wednesday
10/24/24 9:42 PM Thursday
Date Time Day of
Week
10/21/24 7:00 AM Monday
10/22/24 7:10 AM Tuesday
10/23/24 9:32 PM Wednesday
10/24/24 9:42 PM Thursday
Notes: This assumes that there are 26 parking spaces on Brenner Avenue and 41 parking spaces on Melrose Street. This DOES NOT INCLUDE any available parking in areas that are not recommended to be a part of the PPD (ie: in front of businesses).

Average Peak Parking Demand (%)
57%
Norm Wray
Melrose St
Total # of Parked
Vehicles
% of Existing Parking Spaces Occupied
Parking Observation Study
Brenner Ave / Melrose St PPD Request
Brenner Ave
54%
62%
14 16
Total # of Parked
Vehicles
0%
0%
58%
54%
0%
15 14
0%
0%
0%
% of Existing Parking Spaces Occupied
19 46%
23 56%
AverageOff-Peak Parking Demand (%)
56%
23 56%
27 66%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
City of Buena Park
City Council Regular Meeting Agenda Report
A. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT (GP-23-1), ZONE CHANGE (23-1), TENTATIVE TRACT MAP (TT-24-1), CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CU-24-1), AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION (MND-24-2) TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 93-UNIT TOWNHOME RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT AT 8030 DALE STREET Meeting
Tuesday, November 12, 2024, 5:00 PM
Agenda Group
PUBLIC HEARING Item: 6A.

Presented By
Harald Luna, Senior Planner
Prepared By
Matt Foulkes, Director of Community and Economic
Development
Approved By
Aaron France, City Manager

RECOMMENDED ACTION
1) Conduct a public hearing; and 2) thereafter based on the analysis provided in this agenda report and the facts and findings provided in the attached Resolutions and an Ordinance, adopt Resolutions and Ordinance approving a General Plan Amendment (GP-23-1) to amend the existing General Plan Land Use designation from Commercial to High Density Residential; a Zone Change (Z-23-1) to amend the existing zoning district from CS (Commercial Shopping) Mixed Use Overlay-45 to RM-20 (Medium-Density Multifamily Residential) Mixed Use Overlay-45; a Tentative Tract Map (TT-24-1) to subdivide an existing parcel into a single-lot for condominium purposes; a Conditional Use Permit (CU-24-1) to permit the proposed 93-unit townhome residential development, and to allow building heights up to 37 feet 7 inches; and Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND-24-2) certifying the project in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) for the property located at 8030 Dale Street.

PREVIOUS CITY COUNCIL ACTION
On August 28, 2024, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing regarding the project. At the conclusion of the public hearing, the Planning Commission voted 4-0-1 (4 ayes, 0 noes, 1 absent) recommending that the City Council approve the project as proposed and certify the Mitigated Negative Declaration.

A public hearing before the City Council on this item was noticed and scheduled for September 24, 2024. The hearing for the item was continued to the regularly scheduled City Council meeting of November 12, 2024.

DISCUSSION
Project location
The project site is located on the southeast corner of Dale Street and La Palma Avenue and consists of a 3.87-acre parcel that is developed with a 44,064-square-foot vacant commercial building, previously occupied by an Orchard Supply Hardware store.

Project description
The proposed project consists of 14 two- and three-story buildings with 39 two-bedroom and 54 three-bedroom units, totaling 93 residential townhomes. Each unit includes an attached two-car garage and one or two floors of living space. The project will provide 15 percent of the units as deed-restricted affordable housing (14 units). The following table provides a summary of the proposed floor plan types and parking provided:

Units: Stories: Bedrooms: Bathrooms: Floor Area: Parking:
6 2 3 2.5
1,419 square
feet
2-car garage
(443 square feet)
39 3 2 2.5
1,222 - 1,319
square feet
2-car garage
(454-541 square
feet)
11 3 3 2.5
1,502 – 1531
square feet
2-car garage
(507-541 square
feet)
37 3 3 3.5
1,701 square
feet
2-car garage
(441-454 square
feet)
Vehicular access to the project will be provided via two driveways located at the southwest corner of the site along Dale Street and at the northeast corner of the site along La Palma Avenue. Internal drive aisles are provided to accommodate on-site vehicular access to each unit, emergency access and trash collection vehicles.

The Buena Park Municipal Code (BPMC) requires townhomes in the RM-20 zone with up to three (3) bedrooms to provide two (2) garage parking spaces plus 1 additional open space per unit. However, because the project is providing affordable housing units, the project qualifies for a reduced parking ratio pursuant to the State Density Bonus Law (Government Code Section 65915), which allows two- to three-bedroom units to provide 1.5 parking spaces per unit for a total required parking of 140 parking spaces. Additionally, per Assembly Bill (AB) 2097, qualified development projects located within ½ mile of a major transit stop are not subject to minimum parking requirements. The project meets this criteria, as the project location is within ½ mile of a major transit stop located at La Palma Avenue and Dale Street, which is serviced by OCTA bus route no. 460 and Metro bus route no. 38 with an approximate frequency of 15-minute intervals. Although not legally required, the applicant has proposed an attached two-car garage for each unit, plus 27 additional open parking spaces for a total of 213 off-street parking spaces, exceeding the maximum amount that could be required by 73 spaces.

The proposed townhome development has been designed in the Spanish Colonial architectural style. The design incorporates an earth-toned color palette with a variety of exterior accent colors and materials, along with variations in wall-planes and building heights to break up building massing and provide visual interest. The southernmost end units of buildings 9 through 13 and the easternmost end unit of building 4 will be two-stories with a total height of 29-feet 6-inches while the remaining units will be three-stories with a total height of up to 37- feet 7-inches.

To maximize privacy for the surrounding single-family homes to the east and south of the project, the buildings located adjacent to the east property line will be setback approximately 20’-8” from the property line, and the buildings located adjacent to the south property line will be setback approximately 12 feet. No balconies are proposed along any south and east facing elevations and the upper story windows have been strategically placed to minimize site lines to the south and east, including the use of faux windows in certain locations to maintain the architectural style and character of the building while ensuring privacy. The existing block walls along the east and south property lines will be maintained and raised to a consistent height of 7-feet to further screen the ground floors of the townhomes from the adjacent single-family residences.

The project will provide over 50,000 square feet of common and private open space throughout the development.

Landscaping is provided along the project frontage, within the parking lot areas, common outdoor open spaces and required setback areas. The landscaped area along the east and south portion of the site will feature mature trees and enhanced landscaping, and decorative paved walkways. The project will feature two separate recreational open space areas that will feature a trellis shade structure, picnic tables, seating areas, built-in barbecues, play structure, and decorative boulders.

APPLICATION ANALYSIS
Entitlements Required
The following entitlements are required for this project:

General Plan Land Use Map Amendment No. GP-23-1 – A General Plan Land Use Map amendment to change the existing General Plan Land Use designation from Commercial to High-Density Residential; Zone Change No. Z-23-1 – A Zoning Map amendment to change the zoning from CS (Community Shopping) Mixed Use Overlay-45 to RM-20 (Medium-Density Multifamily Residential) Mixed Use Overlay-45; Tentative Tract Map No. TT-24-1 – To subdivide an existing parcel into a single lot for condominium purposes (93-unit townhomes); and
Conditional Use Permit No. CU-24-1 – A Conditional Use Permit for the proposed 93-unit condominium townhome development, and to allow building heights up to 37-feet 7-inches.

General Plan Land Use Map and Zoning Map Amendments
The Project implements General Plan Goals and Policies by providing a diversity of housing stock that will enhance the physical and visual qualities of the property with significant landscaping, interesting urban design elements, including a variety of building materials, and varied façades. The project also includes gathering spaces with amenities to support the needs of residents and their visitors. The proposed RM-20 Mixed Use Overlay-45 zoning classification is consistent with the proposed General Plan Land Use Designation and the project has been designed to comply with all applicable development standards in the RM-20 zone. Additionally, the proposed development will redevelop an underutilized, long-vacant commercial property into a for-sale residential development that supports the City’s need for additional housing.

The project will provide 15 percent of the total units (14 units) as deed restricted affordable housing. By providing affordable housing units, the project qualifies for density bonus units, as well as concessions, incentives, and waivers consistent with State Density Bonus Law. Of the 14 affordable housing units, 12 units are designated at the Moderate-Income affordability range and 2 units are designated at the Low-Income affordability range.

Tentative Tract Map and Conditional Use Permit
The proposed project will subdivide an existing parcel containing approximately 3.87 acres into a single lot for condominium purposes (93-unit townhomes). According to the State Density Bonus Law, the project qualifies for one concession because of the proposed affordable housing. The concession requested is to allow a building height of up to 37-feet, 7-inches when located within 50 feet of an RS zone. Additionally, the developer is eligible to receive waivers from the City’s development standards when those standards would physically preclude the development at the density permitted. The project, with the requested concession and waivers, meets the BPMC standards within the RM-20 zone.

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, the City determined that an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) is the appropriate environmental analysis for this project. In accordance with Section 15063 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), an IS/MND was prepared.

Pursuant to 15072 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, a Notice of Intent (NOI) to adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) was filed, posted, and mailed on July 19, 2024, for the CEQA-mandated thirty (30) day public review and comment period. The comment period ended on August 19, 2024. Seven (7) comments were received and responses to the comments were prepared and included in the Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration. A copy of the response to comments and final draft Mitigated Negative Declaration is provided. With the mitigation measures incorporated into the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, the environmental analysis concluded that the project will not have a significant impact on the environment.

PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE
Notice of the public hearing was posted at City Hall, the Buena Park Library, and the Ehlers Event Center, on October 31, 2024. Notice of the public hearing was published in the Buena Park Independent on November 1, 2024. A total of 570 public hearing notices were mailed to property owners located within 300 feet of the subject property and beyond, on October 31, 2024.

BUDGET IMPACT
There is no budget impact associated with this action.

Attachments
Att 1 - City Council Resolution General Plan Amendment No. GP-23-1.pdf Att 2 - City Council Ordinance Zone Change No. Z-23-1.pdf Att 3 - City Council Resolution Tentative Tract Map No. TT-24-1 and Conditional Use Permit No. CU-24-1.pdf Att 4 - City Council Resolution Mitigated Negative Declaration No. MND-24-2.pdf Att 5 - Final Initial Study Mitigated Negative Declaration Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program web link.pdf Att 6a - CU-24-1 Development Plans dated “RECEIVED JUL 3 2024 PLANNING DIV”.pdf Att 6b - CU-24-1 Development Plans dated “RECEIVED JUL 3 2024 PLANNING DIV”.pdf Att 7 - TT-24-1 Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 19319 Plans dated “RECEIVED JUL 14 2024 PLANNING DIV”.pdf Att 8 - Vicinity Map for GP-23-1 Z-23-1 TT-24-1 CU-24-1 MND-24-2.pdf RESOLUTION NO.

GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. GP-23-1

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BUENA

PARK, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
GP-23-1 AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM

COMMERCIAL TO HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL FOR THE
PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8030 DALE STREET, AND MAKING

FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Buena Park adopted the Buena Park General Plan as required by law on December 7, 2010, through the adoption of Resolution No. 12497; and WHEREAS, Christopher Courtney of Brandywine Homes, applicant, 2355 Main Street, Suite 220, Irvine, CA 92614, on behalf of Perge Ventures, Inc. a Delaware Corporation, property owner, 13000 E. Firestone Boulevard, Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670 has filed an application for General Plan Amendment No. GP-23-1 to change the land use designation from Commercial to High Density Residential on certain property located at 8030 Dale Street (Assessor’s Parcel Number (APN): 070- 501-01), in the City of Buena Park, California (“Subject Property”); and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing, as required by law, to consider General Plan Amendment No. GP-23-1 to update the General Plan Land Use Map within the Land Use and Community Design Element from Commercial to High Density Residential for the subject property, along with a Mitigated Negative Declaration No. MND-24-2, for the Project. Said public hearing was conducted and concluded on August 28, 2024, and Resolution No. 6357 was approved recommending that the City Council approve General Plan Amendment No. GP-23-1, amending the General Plan Land Use Map of the Land Use and Community Design Element of the General Plan; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing before the City Council on this item was noticed and scheduled for September 24, 2024, and the hearing on the item was continued to the regularly scheduled City Council meeting of November 12, 2024.

WHEREAS, on November 12, 2024, the City Council of the City of Buena Park conducted a duly noticed public hearing, as required by law, to consider the proposed General Plan Amendment GP-23-1. Said public hearing was concluded prior to the adoption of this Resolution.

WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.

A. Resolution.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BUENA PARK, CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. The proposed General Plan Amendment No. GP-23-1 is consistent with the goals, policies, purposes, objectives, and programs of the City’s General Plan. The General Plan Amendment will provide additional housing to enhance the viability of the City’s residential Resolution No.

General Plan Amendment No. GP-23-1
November 12, 2024
development. The project supports the following General Plan Policies:
 General Plan Land Use Element Policy LU-1.2: Ensure future development provides for a variety of commercial, industry, and housing that serve the spectrum of incomes within the region.  General Plan Land Use Element Policy LU-1.3: Establish a wide range of residential density and non-residential intensities to encourage a wide range of development opportunities.  General Plan Land Use Element Policy LU-3.1: Ensure that development activities acknowledge the protection and enhancement of quality of life in the City’s neighborhoods.  General Plan Land Use Element Policy LU-3.2: Ensure environmental and fiscal impacts are evaluated to minimize impacts to the physical environment and fiscal obligations of the City.  General Plan Land Use Element Policy LU-3.3: Ensure land use decisions consider impacts to infrastructure and service needs.
 General Plan Land Use Element Policy LU-4.3: Promote the clustering of development adjacent to transportation facilities including amenities to encourage transportation and service nodes.  General Plan Land Use Element Policy LU-5.1: Ensure Buena Park is in compliance with applicable state and regional housing mandates.
 General Plan Land Use Element Goal LU-6: A housing stock that meets the diverse needs of Buena Park’s existing and future residents.
 General Plan Land Use Element Policy LU-6-1: Provide for housing opportunities that address the needs of those who currently live or desire to live in Buena Park.  General Plan Land Use Element Policy LU-6.3: Locate affordable housing adjacent to jobs, retail, schools, open space, and public transportation.  General Plan Land Use Element Policy LU-6.6: Provide a wide range of housing options for Buena Park residents, including owner and rental housing adjacent to jobs, shopping, and transit.
 General Plan Land Use Element Policy LU-8.1: Encourage a variety of creative methods for supplying affordable housing.
 General Plan Housing Element Goal 3.0: Provide suitable sites for housing development, which can accommodate a range of housing by type, size, location, price, and tenure.  General Plan Housing Element Policy 2.1: Facilitate homeownership opportunities for low- and moderate-income households.
 General Plan Housing Element Policy 3.2: Encourage development of residential uses in strategic proximity to employment, recreational facilities, schools, neighborhood commercial areas, and transportation routes.
 General Plan Housing Element Policy 3.3 Encourage compatible residential development in areas with recyclable or underutilized land.
 General Plan Housing Element Policy 3.4: Allow flexibility within the city’s standards and regulations to encourage a variety of housing types.

Section 2. The proposed General Plan Amendment No. GP-23-1 will promote the orderly development of the City and the public health, safety, and welfare by enhancing and maintaining sound and logical land use and development practices guided by the Land Use and Community Design Element. The proposed General Plan Amendment does not modify any health and safety regulations. The proposed General Plan Amendment changes the land use designation of one parcel from Commercial to High Density Residential. This change in land use designation is aligned with the General Plan’s goal of increasing housing supply citywide.

Resolution No.

General Plan Amendment No. GP-23-1
November 12, 2024
Section 3. The proposed General Plan Amendment No. GP-23-1 will increase, not diminish, the land available for housing within the City. The proposed General Plan Amendment will provide added housing opportunities by facilitating the development of 93 townhouse residential units, which will enhance the viability of the City’s housing supply.

Section 4. The proposed General Plan Amendment No. GP-23-1 will maintain and improve the viability of the housing stock within the area in a manner consistent with the character of surrounding neighborhoods and will promote the orderly development of the subject property.

Section 5. The proposed General Plan Amendment No. GP-23-1 will develop an underutilized commercial property with a vacant commercial building with townhouse residential buildings and uses that are complimentary to the existing uses in the surrounding area, thereby enhancing and conserving the neighborhood property values.

Section 6. The City Council finds that facts supporting the above-specified findings are contained in the staff report and exhibits, and information provided to this Council during the public hearing conducted on November 12, 2024 with respect to the Project.

Section 7. The City Council has reviewed and considered all components of the requested General Plan Amendment No. GP-23-1 including compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) through the preparation of a Mitigated Negative Declaration No.

MND-24-2, adopted by separate resolution, the City Council has determined that the Mitigated Negative Declaration is legally adequate and that the Project would not result in any new or substantially more severe environmental impacts, with the adopted mitigation requirements, than those considered and addressed in the Mitigated Negative Declaration No. MND-24-2.

Section 8. The City Council of the City of Buena Park hereby approves and adopts General Plan Amendment GP-23-1, amending the General Plan Land Use Map of the Land Use and Community Design Element changing the land use designation of the subject property from Commercial to High Density Residential attached hereto as Exhibit “A”.

Section 9. The City Clerk shall Certify to the adoption of this Resolution.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 12th day of November 2024, by the following called vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAINED: COUNCILMEMBERS:
____________________________
Mayor
ATTEST:
___________________________
City Clerk
Resolution No.

General Plan Amendment No. GP-23-1
November 12, 2024

EXHIBIT A
Existing General Plan Land Use Map: Commercial Land Use Designation Low Density Residential
Commercial
Entertainment Mixed-Use
Project Site
Resolution No.

General Plan Amendment No. GP-23-1
November 12, 2024

EXHIBIT A
Proposed General Plan Land Use Map: High-Density Residential Designation Low Density Residential High Density Residential
Commercial
Entertainment Mixed-Use
Project Site
ORDINANCE NO.

ZONE CHANGE NO. Z-23-1

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BUENA
PARK APPROVING ZONE CHANGE Z-23-1 TO CHANGE THE ZONING

CLASSIFICATION FROM CS (COMMUNITY SHOPPING) MIXED USE
OVERLAY-45 TO RM-20 (MEDIUM-DENSITY MULTIFAMILY
RESIDENTIAL) MIXED USE OVERLAY-45 FOR THE PROPERTY
LOCATED AT 8030 DALE STREET (APN: 070-501-01)
A. Recitals.
(i) Christopher Courtney of Brandywine Homes (“Applicant”), 2355 Main Street, Suite 220, Irvine, CA 92614, on behalf of Perge Ventures, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, property owner, 13000 E. Firestone Boulevard, Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670 has filed an application for Zone Change No. Z-23-1 to change the existing zoning classification from CS (Community Shopping) Mixed Use Overlay-45 to RM-20 (Medium-Density Multifamily Residential) Mixed Use Overlay-45 of the subject property located at 8030 Dale Street (“Site”) to develop the property with a ninety-three (93)-unit townhome residential community (“Project”). The Applicant has also submitted applications to amend the General Plan (General Plan GP-23-1), subdivide the parcel (TT-24-1), Conditional Use Permit (CU-24-1) for the development of the Project, and Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND-24-2).
(ii) Pursuant to Section 19.404.020(C) of the City’s Municipal Code, the RM-20 (Medium-Density Residential) zoning district authorizes for the development and preservation of medium-density apartments, condominiums, and group quarters in locations convenient to community commercial, recreational, and cultural activities. (iii) The Project’s potential environmental impacts were analyzed through Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration No. MND-24-2 and no significant environmental impact was found.
(iv) On August 28, 2024, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing, as required by law, to consider Zone Change No. Z-23-1 to amend the Zoning Map from CS (Community Shopping) Mixed Use Overlay-45 to RM-20 (Medium-Density Multifamily Residential) Mixed Use Overlay-45 for the Subject Property, along with a Mitigated Negative Declaration No. MND-24-2, for the Project.
(v) The Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 6358 recommending that the City Council approve the change of the zoning classification from CS (Community Shopping) Mixed Use Overlay-45 to RM-20 (Medium-Density Multifamily Residential) Mixed Use Overlay45, including the Mitigated Negative Declaration No. MND-24-2, for the Project, and concluded said hearing prior to the adoption of this Resolution.
(vi) A public hearing before the City Council on this item was noticed and scheduled for September 24, 2024, and the hearing on the item was continued to the regularly scheduled City Council meeting of November 12, 2024.

Ordinance No.

Zone Change No. Z-23-1
November 12, 2024

(vii) On November 12, 2024 the City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing, as required by law, to consider the proposed Zone Change Z-23-1. Said public hearing was concluded prior to the adoption of this Ordinance.
(viii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred.

B. Ordinance.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BUENA PARK DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. The City Council hereby finds that all the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct.

Section 2. The proposed Zone Change No. Z-23-1 will be in conformance with the City’s General Plan, as amended, and will facilitate a townhome residential development resulting in additional housing to enhance the City’s residential housing stock. The Project further conforms to the General Plan goals and policies for the reasons set forth in the General Plan Amendment GP-23-1 Resolution, which findings are incorporated herein by reference.

Section 3. The City Council finds that Zone Change No. Z-23-1, as specified in Exhibit "A" and made a part hereof by reference, will promote the orderly development of the City and public health, safety and welfare.

Section 4. The City Council finds that Zone Change No. Z-23-1 will not have a detrimental effect upon land available for housing within the City. By applying the Zone Change to the Subject Property, will facilitate the development of a townhome multi-family residential development opportunity in the City.

Section 5. The proposed Zone Change will provide additional land available for viable residential development within the City, and will not create substantial demands for new infrastructure. Adequate infrastructure and utilities are available in the area to serve the Project and no substantial new infrastructure is required as a result of this Zone Change.

Section 6. The proposed Zone Change will promote the orderly development of the Subject Property with a new townhome multi-family residential development that will increase the City’s housing supply while conserving neighborhood property values.

Section 7. The City Council has reviewed and considered all components of the requested Zone Change No. Z-23-1 including compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) through the preparation of a Mitigated Negative Declaration No. MND-24-2 adopted by separate resolution, the City Council has determined that the Mitigated Negative Declaration is legally adequate and that the Zone Change would not result in any new or substantially severe environmental impacts than those considered and addressed by the mitigation measures included the Mitigated Negative Declaration No. MND-24-2.

Ordinance No.

Zone Change No. Z-23-1
November 12, 2024

Section 8. Severability. If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance, is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance, and each section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions thereof be declared invalid or unconstitutional.

Section 9. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage of this Ordinance.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 12th day of November 2024, by the following called vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAINED: COUNCILMEMBERS:
____________________________
Mayor
ATTEST:
___________________________
City Clerk
I, Adria M. Jimenez, City Clerk of the City of Buena Park, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing ordinance was introduced and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Buena Park held on the 12th day of November 2024. _____________________________
City Clerk
Ordinance No.

Zone Change No. Z-23-1
November 12, 2024

Exhibit A
Existing Zoning District Map: CS (Community Shopping) Mixed Use Overlay – 45 RS-6 (One-Family Residential)
CR (Regional Commercial) Mixed Use Overlay-100
CS (Community Shopping) Mixed Use Overaly-45
Project Site
Ordinance No.

Zone Change No. Z-23-1
November 12, 2024

Exhibit A
Proposed Zoning District Map: RM-20 (Medium-Density Multifamily Residential) Mixed Use Overlay - 45
RS-6 (One-Family Residential)
CR (Regional Commercial) Mixed Use Overlay-100
CS (Community Shopping) Mixed Use Overaly-45
RM-20 (Medium Density Multifamily Residential) Mixed Use Overlay-45 Project Site
RESOLUTION NO.

TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. TT-24-1
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. CU-24-1

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BUENA PARK APPROVING A TENTATIVE TRACT MAP TO SUBDIVIDE AN EXISTING 3.87-

ACRE PARCEL FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES IN CONJUNCTION WITH CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF 93- UNIT TOWNHOMES, AND TO ALLOW BUILDING HEIGHTS UP TO 37 FEET 7 INCHES FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8030 DALE STREET (APN:
070-501-01), AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF
WHEREAS, Christopher Courtney of Brandywine Homes,(“Applicant”), 2355 Main Street, Suite 220, Irvine, CA 92614, on behalf of Perge Ventures, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, property owner, 13000 E. Firestone Boulevard, Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670 has filed an application for a Tentative Tract Map No. TT-24-1 and Conditional Use Permit No. CU-24-1 to subdivide an existing parcel containing 3.87-acres for condominium purposes, and allow development of ninety-three (93) unit townhomes with building heights up to 37 feet 7 inches for the property located at 8030 Dale Street in Buena Park, California, in the County of Orange (APN: 070-501-01). Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map and Conditional Use Permit request are referred to as the “Application.”; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Buena Park conducted a duly noticed public hearing, as required by law, to consider Tentative Tract Map No. TT-24-1 and Conditional Use Permit No. CU-24-1 along with a Mitigated Negative Declaration No. MND24-2 for the Project. Said public hearing was conducted and concluded on August 28, 2024; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission approved Resolution No. 6359 recommending that the City Council adopt Tentative Tract Map No. TT-24-1 and Conditional Use Permit No.

CU-24-1, as conditioned; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing before the City Council on this item was noticed and scheduled for September 24, 2024, and the hearing on the item was continued to the regularly scheduled City Council meeting of November 12, 2024.

WHEREAS, on November 12, 2024, the City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the Application, as required by law, and concluded said hearing prior to the adoption of this Resolution; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Buena Park has reviewed and considered all components of the proposed Tentative Tract Map No. TT-24-1 and Conditional Use Permit No. CU-24-1 and concluded its public hearing prior to adoption of this resolution; and WHERAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.

B. Resolution.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BUENA PARK, CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:

Resolution No.

Tentative Tract Map No. TT-24-1 and Conditional Use Permit No. CU-24-1 November 12, 2024

Section 1. The City Council hereby specifically finds that all the facts set forth in the Recitals of this Resolution are true and correct.

Section 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to the City Council during the above-referenced hearing, including written staff reports, verbal testimony, and the Conditional Use Permit CU-24-1 Development Plans stamped “RECEIVED JUL 3 2024 PLANNING DIV.” and Tentative Tract Map TT-24-1 Plans stamped “RECEIVED JUL 14 2024 PLANNING DIV.,” this City Council hereby specifically finds, determines, and resolves as follows:

Conditional Use Permit
a. FINDING: The proposed use and development is consistent with the General Plan and any applicable specific plans.

FACT: The proposed 93-unit townhome residential development is a permitted use within the RM-20 (Medium-Density Multifamily Residential) zone, as conditioned, and approved concurrently with General Plan Amendment No. GP-23-1, Zone Change No.

Z-23-1, and Mitigated Negative Declaration No. MND-24-2 with the appropriate Conditions of Approval and Mitigation Measures will meet all applicable requirements of the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance, and other laws. The proposal is consistent with the design goals of the Architectural Design Guidelines for multifamily residential developments by providing building and site enhancements. The proposal will comply with density, lot coverage, setbacks, floor area, parking, circulation, open space, building materials, as conditioned, and other applicable requirements.
b. FINDING: The site is adequate in size, shape, topography, location, utilities and other factors, to accommodate the proposed use.

FACT: The site area will be adequate in size, shape, topography, location, utilities and other factors to accommodate the townhome community. The site is relatively flat, and can accommodate the proposed development along with open space provisions for the future residents.
c. FINDING: Adequate street access and traffic capacity are or will be available to serve the proposed development as well as existing and anticipated development in the surrounding area.

FACT: The Project will gain access from La Palma Avenue and Dale Street. La Palma Avenue is considered a Primary Highway in the City’s Mobility Element, within the General Plan. A Primary Highway is a four-lane divided roadway, with a typical right-ofway width of 100 feet, and a roadway width curb to curb of 84 feet, including a 14-foot median. Additionally, Dale Street is considered a Secondary Arterial in the City’s Mobility Element, Resolution No.

Tentative Tract Map No. TT-24-1 and Conditional Use Permit No. CU-24-1 November 12, 2024

within the General Plan. A Secondary Arterial is a four-lane undivided (without a median) roadway, with a typical right-of-way width of 80 feet, and a roadway width from curb-to-curb of 64 feet. Both driveways enter the site into a 24-foot-wide interior street. The driveways are not proposed to be gated, which eliminates potential for queuing vehicles into the public right-ofway for site access. The Project proposes to construct a raised landscaped center median on La Palma Avenue to allow for left out and left in access to the Project site. As such, adequate street access and traffic capacity are available to serve the proposed 93-unit townhome development as well as existing and anticipated development in the surrounding area.
d. FINDING: Adequate utilities and public services will be available to serve the proposed development as well as existing and anticipated development in the surrounding area.

FACT: Adequate utilities and public services will be available, as conditioned, to serve the use, as well as, existing and anticipated development in the surrounding area. The Site is fully served by utilities, and meets the City standards for public services and utilities to the serve the Site.
e. FINDING: The use and development will be compatible with the intended character of the area.

FACT: The proposed 93-unit townhome residential development will be compatible with the intended character of the area and not negatively impact surrounding properties since the investment in the currently underutilized property with a vacant commercial building will elevate the property’s aesthetics. All improvements meet the Buena Park Municipal Code requirements for the RM20 zone as well as the Design Guidelines for Multi-Family for the purpose of promoting high-quality design that is compatible with adjacent properties. The exterior architectural design is in reasonable harmony with the architectural character of the surrounding area. All the building materials, colors, and finishes proposed for the townhome residential development are in harmony with the surrounding area. As conditioned, the
proposed 93-townhome units will enhance the visual integrity of the subject property as well as the surrounding area.
f. FINDING: Any criteria set forth elsewhere in this Title for the approval the specific use and development will be satisfied.

FACT: Pursuant to the Buena Park Municipal Code (BPMC) Section

19.412.010 (Uses Permitted), condominiums require approval of a Conditional Use Permit in the RM-20 (Medium-Density
Multifamily Residential) zone as amended by Z-32-1. As
conditioned, the proposed townhome development will
Resolution No.

Tentative Tract Map No. TT-24-1 and Conditional Use Permit No. CU-24-1 November 12, 2024

complement the surrounding area and all the criteria set forth elsewhere in this Title for approval will be satisfied. g. FINDING: Any adverse effects of the use and development are justified and fully balanced by offsetting benefits to the public interest.

FACT: An Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration No. MND-24-2 was prepared in connection with the associated General Plan Amendment No. GP-23-1, Zone Change No. Z-23-1, Tentative Tract Map No. TT-24-1, and Conditional Use Permit No. CU-24-

1. Environmental impacts were studied and mitigation measures identified in the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program to mitigate potential environmental impacts to less than significant levels. Additionally, there are conditions of approval that shall be implemented to prevent potentially adverse effects on the general public.

Subdivision (TT-24-1)
a. The subdivision map design and improvements are consistent with the City's General Plan, Zoning Ordinance, and Subdivision Ordinance and the State Subdivision Map Act. The plan conforms to density pursuant to the State Density Bonus Law (Government Code Section 65915), open space, street design, and includes required public improvements consistent with the General Plan designation of High-Density Residential as amended by GP-23-1. The High-Density Residential land use designation is characterized by condominium and apartment development with a base density of 20 dwelling units per acre. The density standard may increase to 24 dwelling units per acre with the application of the Site Area Bonus. The Affordable Housing Area Bonus may increase the density to 30 dwelling units. The Project proposes the development of 93 townhome units on approximately 3.87 acres, consistent with the High-Density Residential designation with the applied State Density Bonus Law. The Project further conforms to the General Plan goals and policies for the reasons set forth in Part B to Resolution for GP-23-1, which findings are incorporated herein by reference. The subdivision map is also consistent with the Zoning Code as amended by Zone Change Z-23-1, which rezones the Site from CS (Community Shopping) to RM-20 (Medium-Density Multifamily Residential) which authorizes medium-density residential uses. The Vesting Tentative Tract Map is consistent with RM-20 zoning district, and facilitates the development of the Site consistent with standards set forth in the Development Plans.
b. The site is physically suitable for the type of development. The site is rectangular in shape and is relatively flat and will accommodate the proposed development.

The development standards applicable to the Site are set forth in the Development Plan attached as Attachments 5a, 5b, and 6 to the Planning Commission Staff Report. The Development Plan proposes the development of the Site in a manner that is compatible with adjacent uses and the surrounding neighborhood with the townhomes generally dispersed evenly throughout the Project site. The Site, which is generally bounded by Dale Street to the west, La Palma Avenue to the north, and single-family residences to the east and south, promotes pedestrian and vehicular Resolution No.

Tentative Tract Map No. TT-24-1 and Conditional Use Permit No. CU-24-1 November 12, 2024

accessibility with the main access to the Site located off La Palma Avenue with a secondary access driveway located off Dale Street. The Project also contemplates private streets that would provide internal circulation within the Project site. The internal streets would provide pedestrian access while maintaining an efficient circulation system for vehicles and emergency vehicle access. c. Neither the design of the subdivision nor the proposed improvements will cause environmental damage or affect fish, wildlife or their habitat. As evaluated in the Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND-24-2), the MND identified the following areas, which required mitigation to be considered less than significant impacts: Biological Resources, Cultural Resources, Geology & Soils, Noise, Hazards & Hazardous Materials, and Tribal Cultural Resources. With the mitigation measures incorporated into the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program included in the MND-24-2, the environmental analysis concluded that the project will not have a significant impact on the environment.
d. The project design will be consistent with the existing and intended area character and design. The Project is harmonious with the surrounding neighborhood and the Vesting Tentative Tract Map facilitates the development of the Site consistent with the Development Plans, which implements the Project in a manner that is compatible with adjacent uses and the surrounding neighborhood. e. The design of the development and proposed improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of, properties within the proposed subdivision. There is no public access easement through the site. Access will occur from public rights-of-way.

Section 3. The City Council has considered the proposed subdivision shown on the Vesting Tentative Tract Map, with the recommended conditions, to determine whether to make any of the findings set forth in the subsections of Section 66474 of the Government Code which states “A legislative body of a city or county shall deny approval of a vesting tentative map, or a parcel map for which a vesting tentative map was not required, if it makes any of the following findings:”
FINDING: Government Code Section 66474(a) - That the proposed map is not consistent with applicable general and specific plans as specified in Section 65451.

FACT: As detailed above, the Vesting Tentative Tract Map is consistent with the General Plan and Zoning, as amended. The Project conforms to the goals and policies in the General Plan as set forth in Part B for General Plan Amendment GP-23-1.

FINDING: Government Code Section 66474(b) - That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is not consistent with applicable general and specific plans.

FACT: As detailed above, the design and improvement of the subdivision, as contemplated in the Development Plans attached as Attachments 5a, 5b, and 6 to the Staff Report, is consistent Resolution No.

Tentative Tract Map No. TT-24-1 and Conditional Use Permit No. CU-24-1 November 12, 2024

with the General Plan and Zoning, as amended. The subdivision map design and improvements are consistent with the City's General Plan, Zoning Ordinance, and Subdivision Ordinance and the State Subdivision Map Act. The plan conforms to density pursuant to the State Density Bonus Law (Government Code Section 65915), open space, street design, and includes required public improvements consistent with the General Plan designation of High-Density Residential and RM-20 (MediumDensity Multifamily Residential) as amended by GP-23-1 and Z23-1.

FINDING: Government Code Section 66474(c) - That the site is not physically suitable for the type of development.

FACT: The site is physically suitable for the townhome residential development proposed. As detailed above, the site is
rectangular in shape and is relatively flat and will accommodate the proposed development. The development standards
applicable to the Site are set forth in the Development Plan attached as Attachments 5a, 5b, and 6 to the Staff Report. The Development Plan proposes the development of the Site in a manner that is compatible with adjacent uses and the
surrounding neighborhood with the townhomes generally
dispersed evenly throughout the Project site. The Site, which is generally bounded by Dale Street to the west, La Palma Avenue to the north, and single-family residences to the east and south, promotes pedestrian and vehicular accessibility with the main access to the Site located off La Palma Avenue with a secondary access driveway located off Dale Street. The Project also contemplates private streets that would provide internal circulation within the Project site. The internal streets would provide pedestrian access while maintaining an efficient circulation system for vehicles and emergency vehicle access.

FINDING: Government Code Section(d) - That the site is not physically suitable for the proposed density of development.

FACT: The site is physically suitable for the proposed density of the development which includes 93 residential townhome units on approximately 3.87 acres. The site is rectangular in shape and is relatively flat and will accommodate the proposed density for the development. The project site’s General Plan land use designation will need to be amended from the current
designation of Commercial to High Density Residential, as well as rezoned from Community Shopping (CS) to RM-20 (MediumDensity Multifamily Residential). Development in the HighDensity Residential land use designation is characterized by condominium and apartment development with a base density of 20 dwelling units per acre. The density standard may increase to 24 dwelling units per acre with the application of the Site Area Resolution No.

Tentative Tract Map No. TT-24-1 and Conditional Use Permit No. CU-24-1 November 12, 2024

Bonus. The Affordable Housing Area Bonus may increase the density to 30 dwelling units. The proposed development of the site, which is primarily vacant, will help revitalize the site in a manner that will be harmonious with the adjacent
neighborhoods.

FINDING: Government Code Section(e) - That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements is likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and
avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat.

FACT: Neither the design of the subdivision nor the proposed improvements will cause substantial environmental damage or affect fish, wildlife or their habitat. As evaluated in the Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND-24-2), the MND identified the following areas, which required mitigation in order to be considered less than significant impacts: Biological Resources, Cultural Resources, Geology & Soils, Noise, Hazards &
Hazardous Materials, and Tribal Cultural Resources. With the mitigation measures incorporated into the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program included in the MND-24-2, the
environmental analysis concluded that the project will not have a significant impact on the environment.

FINDING: Government Code Section 66474(f) - That the design of the subdivision or type of improvements is likely to cause serious public health problems.

FACT: Neither the design of the subdivision nor the type of improvements are likely to cause serious public health problems.

Issues of public health were evaluated in the Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND-24-2), which determined that the Project will not have a significant impact on the environment.

FINDING: Government Code Section 66474(g) - That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of, property within the proposed subdivision.

FACT: Neither the subdivision nor the types of improvements will conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through, or use of, property within the subdivision. The Project contemplates private streets that would provide internal circulation within the Project site, including pedestrian access while maintaining an efficient circulation system for vehicles and emergency vehicle access.

Section 4. Government Code Section 66412.3. In approving this Vesting Tentative Tract Map, the City has considered the housing needs of the region. Approval of the Vesting Tentative Tract Map will facilitate the ability to develop approximately 93 residential units, which Resolution No.

Tentative Tract Map No. TT-24-1 and Conditional Use Permit No. CU-24-1 November 12, 2024

will significantly enhance the City’s supply of housing, including the City’s supply of affordable housing. As evaluated in the Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND-24-2), the proposed project will be sufficiently serviced by infrastructure and public services will be sufficiently available.

Section 5. Government Code Section 66473.1. The design of the subdivision reflected on the Vesting Tentative Tract Map provides, to the extent feasible, for passive and natural heating and cooling opportunities. The residential buildings, and open spaces, will to the extent feasible, account for optimized shading, taking into account open space and building design requirements and associated design elements.

Section 6. The City Council of the City of Buena Park has reviewed and considered all components of the requested Tentative Tract Map No. TT-24-1 and Conditional Use Permit No. CU-24-1 and adopts the attached Mitigated Negative Declaration MND-24-2 and associated Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program and certifies that the Mitigated Negative Declaration for General Plan Amendment No. GP-23-1, Zone Change No. Z-23-1, Tentative Tract Map No. TT-24-1, and Conditional Use Permit No. CU-24-1 has been completed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the State CEQA Guidelines, and local procedures adopted pursuant thereto, and has reviewed and considered the information contained in the MND. The City of Buena Park shall file a Notice of Determination (NOD) with the County Clerk of Orange County and the Secretary of the Resources Agency pursuant to the provisions of Section 21152 of Public Resources Code and State CEQA Guidelines Section 15075 adopted pursuant thereof.

Section 7. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in this Resolution, the City Council hereby approves Conditional Use Permit CU-24-1 Development Plans stamped “RECEIVED JUL 3 2024 PLANNING DIV.” and Tentative Tract Map TT-24-1 Plans stamped “RECEIVED JUL 14 2024 PLANNING DIV.,” as modified herein and the conditions set forth in Section 8 of this Resolution.

Section 8. The following conditions are deemed necessary to protect the public health, safety, and general welfare and are reasonable and proper in accordance with the purpose and intent of the Buena Park City Code:

BUILDING DIVISION:

1. The project shall comply with state and federal disabled access requirements.

2. The project shall comply with the California Building Codes as adopted and amended by the City of Buena Park Municipal Code, Title 15.

3. The building/buildings shall be fully fire-sprinklered as required by the City of Buena Park Municipal Code, Title 1, and/or the California Building Codes.

4. A geotechnical investigation report prepared by a qualified geotechnical engineer is required. The applicant shall submit this report for review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits.

5. The construction plans require professional preparation. Submit plans and structural calculations prepared by a California registered engineer or architect.

6. After the public hearing appeal period ends, applicant shall submit three (3) sets of construction plans to the Building Division for plan check in order to obtain required building permits.

Resolution No.

Tentative Tract Map No. TT-24-1 and Conditional Use Permit No. CU-24-1 November 12, 2024

ORANGE COUNTY FIRE AUTHORITY (OCFA):

1. Plan Submittal: The applicant or responsible party shall submit the plan(s) listed below to the Orange County Fire Authority for review. Approval shall be obtained on each plan prior to the event specified.

2. Prior to OCFA clearance of a final map or issuance of a precise grading permit or a building permit, if a grading permit is not required:
 Fire Master Plan (service code PR145)

3. Prior to issuance of a building permit:
 Underground piping for private hydrants and fire sprinkler systems (service code PR470-PR475)

4. Prior to concealing interior construction:
 Sprinkler monitoring system (service code PR500)

5. Specific submittal requirements may vary from those listed above depending on actual project conditions identified or present during design development, review, construction, inspection, or occupancy. Portions of the project that are deferred shall be subject to the codes, standards, and other applicable requirements in force on the date that the deferred plan is submitted to OCFA. Standard notes, guidelines, informational bulletins, submittal instructions, and other information related to plans reviewed by the OCFA may be found by visiting ocfa.org on the Planning and Development Section homepage.

6. Temporary/Final Occupancy Inspections: Prior to issuance of temporary or final certificate of occupancy, all OCFA inspections shall be completed to the satisfaction of the OCFA inspector and be in substantial compliance with codes and standards applicable to the project and commensurate with the type of occupancy (temporary or final) requested. Inspections shall be scheduled at least five days in advance by calling OCFA Inspection Scheduling at 714-573-6150.

7. Emergency Access Easements: Irrevocable reciprocal access easements for emergency access purposes to the benefit of the City of Buena Park shall be recorded concurrently with the final map or, where no final map is required, prior to approval of the fire master plan.

8. Lumber-drop Inspection: After installation of required fire access roadways and hydrants, the applicant shall receive clearance from the OCFA prior to bringing combustible building materials on-site. Call OCFA Inspection Scheduling at 714-573- 6150 with the Service Request number of the approved fire master plan at least five days in advance to schedule the lumber drop inspection.

PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT:

DESIGN:

1. Grading, storm drain, street, sewer, water, and erosion control plans shall be prepared by a registered engineer, at a minimum scale of 1” = 40’, and on 24” by 36” sheets.

Any proposed improvements shall be designed and constructed per City Standards.

Any existing improvements in the public right-of-way, adjacent to project parcel frontage, that are not in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) shall be removed and reconstructed or added to meet the ADA requirements and must comply with City Standards.

Resolution No.

Tentative Tract Map No. TT-24-1 and Conditional Use Permit No. CU-24-1 November 12, 2024

2. New Public Improvements to include the following:

A. All vehicular access to the site shall be provided in locations approved by the Traffic Division. An emergency access within the project parcel shall be approved by the Orange County Fire Authority and an approved copy of the plan shall be submitted to the Engineering Division with the submittal of the grading plan.

B. A raised landscape median on La Palma Ave. shall be constructed to accommodate left turns into and out of the development. It is the responsibility of the developer/owner to prepare a design that is submitted and approved by the Public Works Engineering Division. All landscaping/irrigation/sprinkler improvements within the median shall comply with the City of Buena Park Water Efficiency Landscape Ordinance, Title 13, Chapter 13.30 of the Buena Park Municipal Code. The maintenance of the landscaped median, including all electrical, water and drainage facilities in public ROW shall be the City’s responsibility, upon completion of the project.

C. All new utilities to the project site shall be undergrounded.

D. Traffic Impact fees shall be in accordance with City Resolution 9726 and the latest City Fee Schedule. Sewer, water, and storm water impact fees shall be per the latest City Fee Schedule.

E. Planting of new trees and ground cover with irrigation system will be required within the parkway landscaping area along the project parcel frontage on Dale St. and La Palma Ave. The type of tree to be planted will be per the Urban Forest Management Plan which is as follows or other as approved by City Engineer:

Dale Street
 Primary: Mexican Fan Palm;
 Recommendation 1: Canary Island Pine;
 Recommendation 2: Southern Magnolia
La Palma Avenue
 Primary: Mexican Fan Palm;
 Recommendation 1: Mexican Fan Palm;
 Recommendation 2: Tuscarora Crape Myrtle;
 Recommendation 2: Evergreen Pear
Owner shall maintain landscaping area per Chapter 19.1112.070 of the City Code.

F. Developer shall install two SmartCover Systems or approved equal, to prevent sanitary sewer overflows. The SmartCover systems to be installed on manhole #37-104 and #42-95 both on La Palma Avenue, please see Exhibit A. The project level CC&R’s shall address allocation of costs associated with the payment of on-going annual monitoring fees and replacement power supply to the SmartCover Manufacture. Upon completion of the project, the City will be Resolution No.

Tentative Tract Map No. TT-24-1 and Conditional Use Permit No. CU-24-1 November 12, 2024

responsible for the maintenance of the SmartCovers which includes the installation of the replacement power supply.

G. A double detector check assembly is required for domestic and fire service connections, and a reduced pressure principle device (RPPD) is required for irrigation service connection per City standards, and devices shall be supplied and installed by contractor. Contractor shall supply and install City approved water meters in the public right-of-way.

H. The existing two driveway approaches along Dale St. and the two driveway approaches along La Palma Ave. shall be removed and replaced with curb and gutter, sidewalk, and a landscape parkway per City Std. 206.

I. The proposed driveway approaches on Dale St. and on La Palma Ave. are to be constructed per City Std. 209. Sidewalks, curb and gutter along the project frontage that are lifted, fractured or failing shall be removed and replaced per City standards.

J. Easement shall be granted to the City when public water and sewer systems are installed within private land. Easement for Ingress and Egress and Public Security Vehicle purposes to be granted to the City of Buena Park with Final Map.

K. All existing public facilities in conflict with new improvements shall be relocated at no cost to the City. Property owner shall dedicate, or cause to be dedicated all easements needed to accommodate the relocation, modification or installation of facilities to be maintained by the City or any public utility company.

L. Water Meter Installation Requirements:

For 1” or smaller meter sizes, the water meter model shall be Neptune T-10 with Encoder that reads in gallons or City approved equal.

For 1.5” or larger meter sizes, the water meter model shall be Neptune HPT or Neptune MACH-10 with Encoder that reads in gallons or City approved equal.

3. Provide an engineering study for any proposed water connections to the City system.

The study shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer for approval by the City Engineer. Any infrastructure upgrades necessary to meet the fire code or the domestic water capacity shall be mitigated by developer. Easements shall be dedicated as needed to accommodate a new public water system. The proposed utility connections shall be made to the City water systems in accordance with the City Code, standards and applicable Federal, State and County regulations.

4. A final hydrology and/or hydraulics study, prepared by a registered engineer, shall be submitted for approval when drainage is altered and/or there is a net increase of the storm water for the proposed project. The storm drain system shall be designed and constructed for a minimum of a 25-year flood per the County of Orange standards. It shall be privately owned and maintained.

5. A geotechnical study prepared by a registered geotechnical engineer is required. The report shall recommend pavement structural section of proposed streets and parking Resolution No.

Tentative Tract Map No. TT-24-1 and Conditional Use Permit No. CU-24-1 November 12, 2024

lots. For the required WQMP, the report shall test and analyze soil conditions for LID (Low Impact Development) requirements, and the implementation of water quality for storm water runoff, including potential infiltration alternatives, soil compaction, saturation, permeability and ground water levels per the County of Orange Technical Guidance Document.

6. Prior to issuance of grading or building permits, permit applicant shall submit for approval, a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on site to control pollutant run-offs.

This WQMP shall identify the: structural and non-structural measures, detailing implementation of BMP’s whenever they are applicable to the project. The design criteria and templates are can be found at:
https://buenapark.com/city_departments/public_works/engineering_services/water_q uality_management_plans.php

7. Prior to the issuance of grading permit for projects that will result in soil disturbance of one acre or more of land, a copy of the Notice of Intent (NOI) and assigned Waste Discharge Identification (WDID) number from the State Water Resources Control Board shall be submitted to the City. As this project is subject to this requirement, the preparation and implementation of a Storm water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be submitted. A copy of the approved SWPPP by the State Water Resources Control Board shall be kept at the project site and be made available for the City upon request. The assigned WDID number must appear on the cover sheet of the grading plan.

8. A Tract map shall be prepared in accordance with the State Subdivision Map Act and Division I of Title 18 of the City Code. All improvements required to be completed by applicant shall be in accordance with the City standards and specifications. All maps shall be concurrently reviewed by the City and the Orange County Survey Department.

The applicant shall forward all plan check comments received from the Orange County Survey Department to the City for each plan check.

PERMIT ISSUANCE:

1. All fees, deposits, and bonds associated with improvements required by the Public Works Department shall be paid prior to the issuance of permits for construction. The fee amounts are specified in the City Fee Schedule.

2. Before exercising any right or performing any obligation pursuant to any permit issued by the Public Works Department, the developer/contractor shall obtain a City Business License and submit required insurance certificates.

3. A Transportation Hauling permit shall be obtained to operate or move a vehicle or combination of vehicles or special mobile equipment of a size or weight of vehicle or load exceeding the maximums specified in the California Vehicle Code (CVC) and the Caltrans Transportation Permit Manual.

4. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, applicant shall record an approved WQMP that includes the Master Covenant & Agreement and an Operational Maintenance Plan with the Orange County Recorder’s office. Two hard copies of the WQMP in 3-ring binders shall be provided to the City.

Resolution No.

Tentative Tract Map No. TT-24-1 and Conditional Use Permit No. CU-24-1 November 12, 2024

5. Prior to final release of the project by the Public Works Department, or the refund of any cash deposits, the developer/contractor shall provide the City with a warranty bond to be held by the City for a period of one (1) year, for all public facilities and improvements.

6. Prior to the grant of occupancy by the City or commencement for the approved use, all improvements required by the Public Works Department shall be completed.

CONSTRUCTION:

1. A traffic control plan, prepared by a registered engineer, shall be submitted for approval for all utility connections, street improvements, and any other work performed in the public right-of-way that require a lane closure. A traffic control plan, prepared by a registered engineer, shall also be submitted for work on private property that results in lane closures.

2. When more than one trench cut is made to install utility lines, then the street shall be either slurry sealed or grind and capped with AC to the nearest lane line of a trench cut from property line to property line. The method of replacing the pavement in kind or better shall be decided based on existing pavement condition.

3. An Engineered Grading and Utility Certification shall be certified by the project engineer. Each phase of construction, fill and soil compaction, rough grading including pad elevations, final grading, utilities, and Water Quality Management Plan shall be certified by the project engineer and submitted to the City.

4. Prior to issuance of occupancy, applicant shall demonstrate all structural BMPs have been constructed in conformance with the approved WQMP.

5. The applicant/contractor shall be responsible for protecting all existing horizontal and vertical survey controls. Any survey controls disturbed during construction shall be reset per Orange County Surveyor Standards after construction.

6. All trash collection services needed during construction or after project completion shall be obtained from the City’s authorized provider.

PLANNING DIVISION:

1. This approval shall be contingent upon the approval of General Plan Amendment No.

GP-23-1, Zone Change No. Z-23-1, Tentative Tract Map No. TT-24-1, and Mitigated Negative Declaration No. MND-24-2.

2. This approval shall be for the development of a 93-unit townhome development consisting of one (1) density bonus unit, associated off-street parking, open space, and site improvements on approximately 3.87 acres on a property located at 8030 Dale Street in substantial compliance with Conditional Use Permit No. CU-24-1 Development Plans dated “RECEIVED JUL 3, 2024 PLANNING DIV.,” and Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 19319 Plans dated “RECEIVED JUL 14, 2024 PLANNING DIV.,” and as conditioned herein.

Resolution No.

Tentative Tract Map No. TT-24-1 and Conditional Use Permit No. CU-24-1 November 12, 2024

3. The applicant and/or property owner shall ensure that a copy of the Planning Commission Resolution, including all conditions of approval, and mitigation measures contained in the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, be reproduced on the first pages of construction drawings and shall be distributed to all design professionals, contractors, and subcontractors participating in the construction phase of the project.

4. The project shall be subject to all the mitigation measures and Project Design Features/Conditions of approval contained within the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (Appendix L of the Final Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration), dated August 28, 2024 and incorporated herein by reference, as Conditions of Approval.

5. An affordable housing agreement on a City provided form to be approved by the City Attorney shall be required prior to Building Division permit issuance. The proposed project will provide a total of 14 units to be designated as affordable housing as demonstrated in the “Affordable Housing Exhibit” dated July 15, 2024. Of the 14 units of affordable housing proposed, 12 units are designated as moderate-income and 2 units are designated as low-income. The affordable housing units shall be deed restricted for a term of 55 years.

6. Plans submitted for plan check shall include architectural amenities generally consistent with the submitted CU-24-1 conceptual development plans stamped “RECEIVED JUL 3, 2024 PLANNING DIV.,” and Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 19319 Plans dated “RECEIVED JUL 14, 2024 PLANNING DIV.” All construction drawings submitted for the development shall include sufficient construction details showing architectural accents, colors, details of construction, and techniques to ensure architectural compatibility throughout the development. Final details shall be approved by the Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits for the project. Final color and material samples shall be provided to the Planning Division with plan check submittals. Architectural features may be replaced or modified subject to approval of the Community and Economic Development Director, based on equivalent provision of acceptable alternatives. Specifications and samples of the following shall be submitted to the Planning Division for approval prior to issuance of building permits:
a. Paint colors for stucco
b. Stucco exterior finishes
c. Roofing material
d. Window trim
e. Window shutters
f. Gable accents
g. Awnings
h. Iron railing
i. Enhanced light fixtures
Architectural features may be replaced or modified subject to approval of the Community and Economic Development Director, based on equivalent provision of acceptable alternatives.

7. Color and material samples shall be submitted to the Planning Division for approval prior to issuance of building permits. The applicant shall demonstrate that proposed Resolution No.

Tentative Tract Map No. TT-24-1 and Conditional Use Permit No. CU-24-1 November 12, 2024

building materials, and other architectural/site features are rated for appropriate durability and longevity. In the event that said rating cannot be obtained, alternate materials shall be used under the direction of the Planning Division.

8. The second and third story windows on the east elevation of building “7A” and “8B”, and the second story windows of the south elevations of buildings “9-13 C” and the east elevation of building “4D” shall be located to promote privacy between properties through such methods as offset or clerestory placement, use of opaque or viewobscuring glass, or faux windows.

9. A total of 186 garage parking spaces, and 27 open parking spaces, including 2 accessible parking spaces shall be provided and maintained.

10. Any new walls and fencing, including those shown on plans shall comply with the City of Buena Park Municipal Code (BPMC) Chapter 19.428 (Development Standards – Fences, Walls, Hedges, and Berms) and shall require separate fence and wall permit approval by the Planning Division, as necessary.

11. A 6-inch wide decorative masonry wall, at least 6 ft. high measured from the highest finished grade on either side of the wall, shall be provided and maintained along the south and east property lines; existing block walls on the south and east property lines shall be repaired and finished where needed consistent with the submitted conceptual plans stamped “RECEIVED JUL 3, 2024 PLANNING DIV.,” and Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 19319 Plans dated “RECEIVED JUL 14, 2024 PLANNING DIV.” in accordance with the structural design approved by the Building Division. All the perimeter walls shall match in color and texture. No block wall construction shall occur until a Grading Plan has been approved by the Public Works Department, if required. Double walls shall be filled and capped to the satisfaction of the City.

12. Landscaping shall be installed in substantial compliance with plans dated “RECEIVED JUL 3, 2024 PLANNING DIV.”. Detailed landscaping/irrigation/sprinkler plans, with signed and stamped Certification of Landscape Design form shall be submitted to the Planning Division for plan check. A ‘Landscape Installation Certificate of Completion’ shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to final inspection of building permits.

All landscaping/irrigation/sprinkler plans shall comply with the City of Buena Park Water Efficiency Landscape Ordinance, Title 13, Chapter 13.30 of the Buena Park Municipal Code.

13. The planting of trees and shrubs shall have plant material selected and planting methods used which are suitable for the soil and climatic conditions of the site. All landscaping areas along the entire site including along the east and south property lines shall be planted with sufficient quantities that include a mixture of 15-gallon, 24- inch box, including mature specimen trees up to a 36-inch box size, to provide screening and protect privacy of adjacent properties. The proposed type, sizes and locations of all landscaping along the east and south property lines shall comply with Southern California Edison easement land use guidelines to ensure that all landscaping will not impact the existing easements located within the property.

14. The open space areas within the development shall be generally consistent with the plans dated “RECEIVED JUL 3, 2024 PLANNING DIV.” Specific features, including Resolution No.

Tentative Tract Map No. TT-24-1 and Conditional Use Permit No. CU-24-1 November 12, 2024

exact design and specifications including landscaping, specified areas for active and passive areas shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Division prior to the issuance of building permits. The open space areas and site amenities shall have appropriate durability and longevity and include elements that are consistent with the following:
a. Bar-be-que grills
b. Picnic tables and benches
c. Trellis shade structure
d. Bike racks
e. Trash, recycle, and hot ash receptacles
f. Play structures and safety surfacing
g. Decorative boulders
h. Pet waste stations

15. Decorative lighting to complement the Spanish Colonial architectural design of the development shall be provided throughout the entire development including the parking area and open space areas. Final location and design of light standards and wall fixtures shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. Standard light poles with box fixtures shall not be considered decorative.

16. Plans submitted for plan check shall include complete photometric plan for the parking areas, drive aisles and open space areas to ensure that there are adequate levels of light within all portions of the parking, drive aisles and open space areas, adjacent properties and public rights of way to ensure proper public safety. All luminaries shall be designed, shielded, or aimed in such a manner so as not to produce glare upon adjacent properties or rights of way.

17. All parking areas and driveways shall be paved and striped in compliance with BPMC Section 19.436.070 (Residential Parking Dimensions and Layout) and Section

19.436.080 (Residential Parking Improvements) as shown on the approved plan. All landscaped areas shall be separated from adjacent vehicular areas by a masonry wall or portland cement concrete (p.c.c.) curb a minimum of 6 inches in height, or by p.c.c. or masonry walkway. It shall be the responsibility of the developer to submit to the Public Works Department such plans as are necessary to ensure the installation of curbs or walls do not detrimentally affect drainage.

18. A six-inch high poured-in-place wheel stop shall be provided for all open parking spaces, located three feet inside of the front boundary of the stalls.

19. A decorative stamped and colored concrete pavement shall be provided at the main driveways along Dale Street and La Palma Avenue. The decorative stamped and colored concrete pavement shall extend the full width of the driveway a minimum of 20 feet from the street property line.

20. All decorative crosswalks located within the property shall match the decorative stamped and colored pavement at the main driveway entries.

Resolution No.

Tentative Tract Map No. TT-24-1 and Conditional Use Permit No. CU-24-1 November 12, 2024

21. A decorative metal screen fencing shall be provided to screen the utility closets located along Dale Street from public view. The decorative metal screen shall be subject to the review and approval of the Planning Division.

22. All rain gutters and downspouts shall be strategically located within the buildings to the maximum extent feasible and painted to match the colors of the building. Exact location of rain gutters and downspouts shall be submitted to the Planning Division for review and approval prior to issuance of building permits.

23. All roof-mounted mechanical equipment shall not visible from adjacent and surrounding properties and streets from a height of five (5) feet above ground level. The installation and screening of air conditioning and similar equipment shall comply with existing design criteria and BPMC Section 19.340.020 (Visual Screening of Mechanical Equipment).

24. The proposed trash enclosures shall be in compliance with the Buena Park Municipal Code Section 19.424.010 (Trash Storage Facilities). Plans submitted for plan check shall include trash receptacles within the common open space areas. The design of the trash receptacles shall compliment the project.

25. Mailboxes shall be supplied, installed and designed to the approval of the Planning Division, with locations subject to the US Postal Service approval.

26. All signs including entry monument sign shall be subject to a separate review and approval by the Planning Division. All signs shall comply with BPMC Section

19.908.010 (Signs in Residential Zones).

27. Covenants, Conditions & Restrictions (CC&Rs), Articles of Incorporation and By-Laws for the homeowner’s association shall be reviewed and approved by City Staff prior to recordation and issuance of Certificate of Occupancy and shall include the following requirements:
a. CC&R’s shall include a restriction which prohibits illegal garage conversions and also require that all garages provide adequate vehicle access be maintained for the parking of two vehicles, unless otherwise permitted by law. b. Future room additions and expansion of balconies and patios shall not be permitted. c. Interior access to all rooms/areas of the townhome units shall be maintained at all times. No sections shall be partitioned off and provided solely with exterior access. In addition, no secondary kitchen or other cooking facilities shall be provided.
d. Modification to any wall or fence within the development, including the wall or fence height, shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Division, prior to building permit issuance.
e. The CC&R’s shall specifically dictate responsibilities between the homeowners association and private property owners for the maintenance, both interior and exterior, of all buildings, plumbing and electrical facilities.

Resolution No.

Tentative Tract Map No. TT-24-1 and Conditional Use Permit No. CU-24-1 November 12, 2024

f. The CC&R’s shall establish provisions for all the parking areas to be maintained and clear of storage in order to maintain parking.
g. CC&R’s shall prohibit parking and any type of obstruction of the required fire access lanes and common area driveways.
h. The CC&R’s shall contain provisions establishing a fair, reasonable, and expeditious procedure for resolving disputes. The HOA shall establish and maintain a reserve fund consistent with the requirements of the Davis-Sterling Act. The CC&R shall include a maintenance schedule for common areas and equipment specifically when maintenance tasks will be performed. (ex. Painting, yard work, etc.)
i. The CC&R’s shall contain a requirement that the HOA file with the City of Buena Park Community Development Department the names, addresses, and telephone numbers of the Association’s property management company and responsible property manager and each member of the Association Board, as of January 1st of each year.
j. Within a required vision clearance area there shall be no fence, tree, shrub, or other obstruction to sight between two feet and seven feet above the established street grade. Vision clearance areas shall be provided at any driveway entrance from or exit to a street: triangular areas on each side of the driveway measuring fifteen feet along the street property line and fifteen feet along the edge of the driveway from the point of intersection of the edge of the driveway with the street property line. k. All trees throughout the development shall be properly maintained in living condition and any damaged or diseased tree shall be replaced by the property owner. l. Balconies and porches shall not be used for storage. m. No vehicular gates or speed bumps within the fire lanes may be installed prior to City review and approval.

28. The Applicant shall provide the Planning Division proof of review and approval of the CC&R’s by the DRE prior to recordation. A copy of the recorded CC&R’s shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to the release of utilities.

29. All required utility services and equipment, including transformers, gas meter, “J” boxes, and similar devices shall be located below grade, to the extent possible, or shall be screened from view by landscaping or ornamental decorative walls. The placement and treatment of all screening devices shall be subject to review and approval of the Planning Division. In addition to said walls, landscaping may also be required as a solution for screening. A preliminary electrical equipment plan, which is prepared by the Southern California Edison Company, shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planning Division prior to the issuance of building permits. The applicant is required to return City approved red line prints to the Southern California Edison Company Planning Department, for preparation of final construction drawings. The location of other utility companies’ appurtenances and meters shall be submitted to the City Planning Division for review and approval prior to installation.

Resolution No.

Tentative Tract Map No. TT-24-1 and Conditional Use Permit No. CU-24-1 November 12, 2024

30. All required double detector check valve assemblies located within public view shall be located below grade to the extent possible or shall be screened from view by landscaping ornamental decorative walls. The placement and treatment of all screening devices shall be subject to review and approval of the Planning Division.

31. Prior to the issuance of Building Permits for each phase of the project or any succeeding residential development approval, all development impact fees associated with development including, but not limited to, park fees mandated by BPMC Section

18.64.080 (Park and recreational facilities dedications – Use of land fees) shall be paid in full.

32. The construction authorized by the Conditional Use Permit shall be started within one (1) year of the expiration of the appeal period and thereafter diligently advanced until completion of the project.

33. This approval may be revoked for any violation of noncompliance with any of these conditions in accordance with BPMC Section 19.132.030 (Revocation).

34. Prior to final inspection, these conditions and all improvements shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City.

35. The project and/or use authorized by this approval shall at all times comply with all applicable local, state, and federal ordinances, statutes, standards, codes, laws, policies, and regulations.

36. The applicant and property owner shall sign a notarized Affidavit of Acceptance of all conditions of approval and return it to the Planning Division within thirty (30) days after the effective date of this approval or prior to the issuance of a building permit or certificate of occupancy, whichever may occur first.

37. The applicant shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents, and employees from any claims and losses whatsoever occurring or resulting to any and all persons, firms, or corporations furnishing or supplying work, services, materials, or supplies in connection with the performance of the use permitted hereby or the exercise of the rights granted herein, any and all claims, lawsuits or actions arising from the granting of or exercise of the rights permitted by this approval and from any and all claims and losses occurring or resulting to any person, firm, or corporation, or property damage, injury, or death arising out of or connected with the performance of the use permitted hereby. Applicant’s obligation to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City as stated hereinabove shall include, but not be limited to, paying all fees and costs incurred by legal counsel of the City’s choice in representing the City in connection with any such claims, losses, lawsuits, or actions, and any award of such damages, judgments, verdicts, court costs or attorneys’ fees in any such lawsuit or action.

Resolution No.

Tentative Tract Map No. TT-24-1 and Conditional Use Permit No. CU-24-1 November 12, 2024

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 12th day of November 2024 by the following called vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAINED: COUNCILMEMBERS:
_________________________
Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________________
City Clerk
Resolution No.

Tentative Tract Map No. TT-24-1 and Conditional Use Permit No. CU-24-1 November 12, 2024

AFFIDAVIT OF ACCEPTANCE:

I/ We do hereby accept all of the conditions contained in this document and all other conditions imposed by Tentative Tract Map No. TT-24-1 and Conditional Use Permit No. CU-24-1 and do agree that I/We shall conform with and abide by all such conditions.

Date:

Printed Name and Signature
Owner / Applicant
RESOLUTION NO.

MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. MND-24-2

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BUENA

PARK, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING MITIGATED NEGATIVE
DECLARATION NO. MND-24-2 FOR GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO.

GP-23-1, ZONE CHANGE NO. Z-23-1, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. TT24-1, AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. CU-24-1, TO DEVELOP A 93-UNIT TOWNHOME PROJECT WITH ASSOCIATED PARKING AND
SITE IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8030 DALE STREET (APN: 070-501-01)
WEHREAS, Christopher Courtney of Brandywine Homes, (“Applicant”), 2355 Main Street, Suite 220, Irvine, CA 92614, on behalf of Perge Ventures, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, property owner, 13000 E. Firestone Boulevard, Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670 has filed a request for General Plan Amendment No. GP-23-1, Zone Change No. Z-23-1, Tentative Tract Map No. TT-24-1, and Conditional Use Permit No. CU-24-1, to develop a 93-unit townhome community with associated parking and site improvements at 8030 Dale Street, Buena Park, California, 90620 (APN: 070-501-01) in the County of Orange (collectively, the “Project”); and
WHEREAS, an Initial Environmental Study for the Project was prepared pursuant to Section 15060 (Preliminary Review) of the State Guidelines based on the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA [California Public Resources Code Section 21000 et.

Seq.]). Pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Article 6 (Negative Declaration Process) Section 15070 (Decision to prepare a negative or mitigated negative declaration), and based on the information contained in the Initial Study, a decision was made to prepare a Mitigated Negative Declaration (“MND”) for the project. The City contracted with an independent consultant, Sagecrest Planning and Environmental, for the preparation of the Mitigated Negative Declaration; and
WHEREAS, a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) with associated Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program was prepared pursuant to the State CEQA Guidelines (California Administrative Code Section 15000 et. seq.) and local procedures adopted pursuant thereto; and
WHEREAS, on July 19, 2024, a Notice of Intent (NOI) to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration was filed and the MND was forwarded to interested persons, organizations, and agencies; and
WHEREAS, the public comment period for the draft MND began on July 19, 2024 and was lawfully closed on August 19, 2024; and
WHEREAS, on August 28, 2024, the Planning Commission of the City of Buena Park held a duly noticed public hearing to consider a recommendation to the City Council to approve General Plan Amendment No. GP-23-1, Zone Change No. Z-23-1, Tentative Tract Map No. TT-24-1, Conditional Use Permit No. CU-24-1, and associated Mitigated Resolution No.

Mitigated Negative Declaration No. MND-24-2
November 12, 2024

Negative Declaration No. MND-24-2. Said public hearing was concluded prior to adoption of this Resolution; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing before the City Council on this item was noticed and scheduled for September 24, 2024, and the hearing on the item was continued to the regularly scheduled City Council meeting of November 12, 2024.

WHEREAS, on November 12, 2024, the City Council of the City of Buena Park, held a duly noticed public hearing to consider approval of Mitigated Negative Declaration No. MND-24-2 for associated General Plan Amendment No. GP-23-1, Zone Change No.

Z-23-1, Tentative Tract Map No. TT-24-1, Conditional Use Permit No. CU-24-1. Said public hearing was concluded prior to adoption of the Resolution; and WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of this resolution have occurred.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BUENA PARK, CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. All of the facts set forth in the Recitals of this Resolution, are true and correct and hereby incorporated by this reference.

Section 2. The City Council finds the Initial Study prepared by the City of Buena Park and Mitigated Negative Declaration No. MND-24-2 and associated Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program is legally adequate. With the implementation of the associated Mitigation Measures discussed in the MND, the potential significant environmental impacts can be reduced to levels of insignificance based on the standards discussed in the MND.

Section 3. The City Council finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration and associated Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program identified all significant environmental effects of the Project; there are no potentially significant environmental impacts not addressed in the Final draft MND.

Section 4. The Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain potential construction-related environmental effects that may result from the Project, however, a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program has been included that would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to less than significant.

Section 5. The City Council adopts the attached Mitigated Negative Declaration MND-24-2 and associated Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program and certifies that the MND for General Plan Amendment No. GP-23-1, Zone Change No. Z23-1, Tentative Tract Map No. TT-24-1, Conditional Use Permit No. CU-24-1, has been completed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the State CEQA Guidelines, and local procedures adopted pursuant thereto, and has reviewed and considered the information contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration.

Section 6. The City Council certifies the completion of Mitigated Negative Declaration No. MND-24-2 and associated Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Resolution No.

Mitigated Negative Declaration No. MND-24-2
November 12, 2024

for General Plan Amendment No. GP-23-1, Zone Change No. Z-23-1, Tentative Tract Map No. TT-24-1, Conditional Use Permit No. CU-24-1. The City of Buena Park shall file a Notice of Determination (NOD) with the County Clerk of Orange County and the Secretary of the Resources Agency pursuant to the provisions of Section 21152 of Public Resources Code and State CEQA Guidelines Section 15075 adopted pursuant thereof.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 12
th day of November 2024 by the following
called vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAINED: COUNCILMEMBERS:
_________________________
Mayor
ATTEST:

City Clerk
I, Adria M. Jimenez, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Buena Park, California, herby certify that the Foregoing resolution was duly and regularly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Buena Park, held this 12th day of November 2024.

City Clerk
ATTACHMENT 5
Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration with Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
https://www.buenapark.com/city_departments/community_development/planning_division/8 030_Dale_Street.php
A0.0 COVER SHEET SHEET INDEX A0.0 COVER SHEET 1 VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN 3 PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN 4 PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN A0.1 STREET SCENE A0.2 STREET SCENE A0.10 BUILDING AREA CALCS A1.0 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN A1.1 OPEN AREA EXHIBIT A1.2 COMMON USEABLE OPEN AREA EXHIBIT A1.3 LADDERING EXHIBIT A2.0 BUILDING ELEVATIONS A2.1 BUILDING ELEVATIONS A2.2 BUILDING ELEVATIONS A2.3 BUILDING ELEVATIONS A2.4 BUILDING ELEVATIONS A2.5 BUILDING ELEVATIONS A2.6 BUILDING ELEVATIONS A2.7 BUILDING ELEVATIONS A2.8 BUILDING ELEVATIONS A3.0 BUILDING PLANS A3.1 BUILDING PLANS A3.2 BUILDING PLANS A3.3 BUILDING PLANS A3.4 BUILDING PLANS A3.5 BUILDING PLANS A3.6 BUILDING PLANS A3.7 BUILDING PLANS A4.0 SITE SECTIONS A5.0 UNIT PLANS A5.1 UNIT PLANS A5.2 UNIT PLANS A5.3 UNIT PLANS A5.4 UNIT PLANS A6.0 COLOR AND MATERIAL BOARDS L-01 OVERALL LANDSCAPE CONCEPT PLAN L-02 OPEN SPACE ENLARGEMENTS L-03 LANDSCAPE CONCEPT IMAGES L-04 WALL AND FENCE CONCEPT PLAN Architecture + Planning 888.456.5849 ktgy.com DALE AND LA PALMA BUENA PARK, CA #2023-0806 SCHEMATIC DESIGN JULY 1, 2024 PROJECT TEAM Developer: Brandywine Homes Chris Courtney 2355 Main Street, Suite 220 Irvine, CA 92614 949-264-8842 Architect: KTGY Bryan Sevy 17911 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 200 Irvine, CA 92614 949-850-2133 Civil: C & V Engineering Dane McDougall 9830 Irvine Center Drive Irvine, CA 92619 949-916-3800 Landscape Architect: Weiland Design Group, Inc. Kim Takaki 28924 Old Town Front Street, Suite 202 Temecula, CA 92590 SITE SUMMARY Legal Description: LOT 52 OF TRACT NO. 2629, IN THE CITY OF BUENA PARK, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 87, PAGES 18, 19 AND 20 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY. APN: 070-501-01 Project Address: 8030 Dale Street Current Zoning: Community Shopping (CS) Proposed Zoning: RM-20 CU-24-1 RECEIVED JUL 3 2024 PLANNING DIV A (Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN 65G 65G (Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN (Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN (Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN (Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN 65G 65G
(Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN
(Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN
(Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN A A A A A A A A A A A A A A0.1 STREET SCENE Architecture + Planning 888.456.5849 ktgy.com DALE AND LA PALMA BUENA PARK, CA #2023-0806 SCHEMATIC DESIGN JULY 1, 2024 DAY RENDER NIGHT RENDER RENDER VIEW A (Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN 65G 65G (Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN (Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN (Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN (Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN 65G 65G
(Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN
(Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN
(Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN A A A A A A A A A A A A A A0.2 STREET SCENE Architecture + Planning 888.456.5849 ktgy.com DALE AND LA PALMA BUENA PARK, CA #2023-0806 SCHEMATIC DESIGN JULY 1, 2024 DAY RENDER NIGHT RENDER RENDER VIEW A0.10 BUILDING AREA CALCS CRC TOWNS AREAS UNIT TYPE FLOOR AREAS NOTE: BUILDING AREAS WERE BUILDINGS WERE R2/U OCCUPANIES WERE CALCULATED USING VALUES FROM CBC TABLE 506.2 FOR OCCUPANCIES R2 (DWELLING UNIT - 7,000 S.F PER STORY) AND U (PRIVATE GARAGE - 16,500 S.F.) AND CBC SECTION 506.2.2 MIXED-OCCUPANCY BUILDINGS. NOTE: CRC TOWNS ARE PERMITTED UNLIMITED BUILDING AREAS. R2 / U CONDOMINIUM BUILDING AREAS Architecture + Planning 888.456.5849 ktgy.com DALE AND LA PALMA BUENA PARK, CA #2023-0806 SCHEMATIC DESIGN JULY 15, 2024 ALLOWABLE BUILDING AREA ALLOWABLE BUILDING HEIGHT PER CBC TABLE 506.2 FOR OCCUPANCIES R2 (DWELLING UNIT - 7,000 S.F PER STORY) AND U (PRIVATE GARAGE - 16,500 S.F.) AND CBC SECTION 506.2.2 MIXED-OCCUPANCY BUILDINGS. PER CBC TABLE 504.3 and 504.4 FOR OCCUPANCIES R2 TYPE VB NFPA 13 AND R3 CRC TOWNS NOTE: A fire alarm system is not required for R-2 residential with a nfpa sprinkler (per section 907.2.9 of the building code)

A A A A A A A A A A A A A A

DALE STREET LA PALMA AVE
65G 65G (Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN
65G (Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN (Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN (Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN 65G (Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN (Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN(Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN (Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN 65G 65G 20' 63'-8" 20'-1"
15'-3" 20'-4" 12'
20'-8"
12'-1" 25'-0" 24'-0" 20'-6" 46'-0"
15'-4" 18'-0"
30'-3" 10C 11C 12C 13C1F 5G14G 6F 8B 9C 4D 3E 2E 7A
24'-0" 24' 24'-0" 24'-0" 24'-0"
24'-0" 14' 14' 11'-6" 11'-6" 25'-2" A1.0 SITE PLAN 0 15 30 60 Architecture + Planning 888.456.5849 ktgy.com DALE AND LA PALMA BUENA PARK, CA #2023-0806 SCHEMATIC DESIGN JULY 9, 2024 1A Building Number Building Type Unit Number Plan Type 5 1 27 10 11 7 10 10 11 10 9 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 9 9 9 9 1212 12 12 6 6 6 6 8 8 8 11 5 13 3 11 11 41111 11 11 1111 11 496 Site Summary Site Area: 3.87 Acres; 168,536 sf Dwelling Units: 93 Units Net Density: 24 du/ac Product Type: 2 & 3 Story Townhomes Occupancy Type: R2 Construction Type: Residential: Type VB Sprinkler Type: NFPA 13 Building Height: 38' Lot Coverage: ±69,014 sf (41%) Total Building Area: ±187,534 sf Building Setbacks: Required Proposed Front (Dale Street): 19' 15' Min. Street Side (La Palma): 19' 15' Min. Rear (East): 10' 12' at 2 story, 20' at 3 story Side (South): 10' 15' at 2 story, 20' at 3 story Unit Summary Plan Type Garage Stories Net Area # 1 2 bd/2.5 ba Side by Side 3 1,233 sf 7 Du 1x 2 bd/2.5 ba Tandem 3 1,222 sf 4 Du 2 2 bd/2.5 ba Tandem 3 1,319 sf 28 Du 3 3 bd/2.5 ba Side by Side 2 1,419 sf 6 Du 4 3 bd/2.5 ba Side by Side 3 1,502 sf 7 Du 4x 3 bd/2.5 ba Tandem 3 1,531 sf 4 Du 5 3 bd/3.5 ba Side by Side 3 1,556 sf 9 Du 6 3 bd/3.5 ba Side by Side 3 1,701 sf 28 Du Total 93 Du Parking Summary:* *Per AB 2097, no minimum parking required for projects within a half-mile radius of a major transit stop. For comparison, the parking standard per State Density Bonus Law would be: 2 Bed: 39 Du x 1.5 Sp/Unit: 59 Spaces 3 Bed: 54 Du x 1.5 Sp/Unit: 81 Spaces Total Spaces: 140 Spaces (1.5/Unit) Parking Provided: Private Garages: 186 Spaces Open Parking: 26 Spaces Total: 212 Spaces (2.28/Unit) Legend 1. Property Line 2. Parking Space - 9'x18' 3. Accessible Parking Space 4. Trash Enclosure 5. Accessible Path of Travel 6. Accessible Ground Floor Unit 7. Decorative Paving (Stamped Concrete or equal) Density Bonus Calculation: Site Area=3.87 Acres x 24 du/ac = 92 13% moderate affordable income provided, allows 8% density bonus 8% of 92.928 = 7.43 additional units 92.928+7.43 =100.36 du ≈100 du Allowable Open Space Summary: Open Area - See Sheet A1.1 Required Total Open Area: 67,414 sf (40% Min.) Provided Open Area: 53,688 sf (31.1%) Common Usable Open Area - See Sheet A1.2 Required: 12,300 sf Provided: 32,822 sf Utility Notes: 1. Control exterior electrical and hose bibs with appropriate metal locking covers and padlocks. 2. Individual sub-meters for water provided at each unit. 3. Electric meters and fire riser cabinets at each building- See keynote 11. 4. Gas service is not provided. 5. For additional utility information, refer to Civil Sheet 4 of 4. 8. Affordable Units 9. Transformers 10. AC Condensers 11. Electrical Cabinet and Fire Riser 12. Existing Driveway to be Removed 13. Turning Path of a Toyota 4Runner 14. Proposed Raised Landscape Median 14 14 A (Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN 65G 65G (Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN (Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN (Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN (Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN 65G 65G(Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN (Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN(Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN A A A A A A A A A A A A A

DALE STREET LA PALMA AVE
20' 63'-8" 20'-1"
15'-3" 20'-4" 12'
20'-8"
12'-1" 25'-0" 24'-0" 20'-6" 46'-0"
15'-4" 18'-0"
30'-3" 10C 11C 12C 13C1F 5G14G 6F 8B 9C 4D 3E 2E 7A
24'-0" 24' 24'-0" 24'-0" 24'-0"
24'-0" 14' 14' 11'-6" 11'-6" 25'-2" A1.1 OPEN AREA EXHIBIT 0 15 30 60 Architecture + Planning 888.456.5849 ktgy.com DALE AND LA PALMA BUENA PARK, CA #2023-0806 SCHEMATIC DESIGN JULY 1, 2024 La Palma Ave Dale Street Open Area Site Area: 168,536 sf Required Total Open Area: 40% Min= 67,414 sf Provided Private Open Area: 10583 sf (6.3%) Provided Common Open Area: 43,105 sf (25.6%) Total Open Area: 53,688 sf (31.9%) A (Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN 65G 65G (Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN (Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN (Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN (Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN 65G 65G(Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN (Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN(Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN A A A A A A A A A A A A A DALE STREET LA PALMA AVE 63'-7" 20'-7"
15'-2" 20'-2" 11'-11"
20'-8"
12'-1" 24' 20'-6" 46'-0"
15'-4" 18'-0"
30'-6" 11'
12'-1"
11'-7" 11'-6" 10C 11C 12C 13C1F 5G14G 6F 8B 9C 4D 3E 2E 7A A1.2 COMMON USABLE OPEN AREA 0 15 30 60 Architecture + Planning 888.456.5849 ktgy.com DALE AND LA PALMA BUENA PARK, CA #2023-0806 SCHEMATIC DESIGN JULY 1, 2024 La Palma Ave Dale Street Common Usable Open Area Required: at least two hundred square feet per dwelling unit for the first twenty dwelling units, plus one hundred fifty square feet per dwelling unit for the next twenty dwelling units, plus one hundred square feet per dwelling unit for each additional dwelling unit. 93 du =20+20+53 du =200(20)+150(20)+100(53) =12,300 sf (min 10'x10'): Provided: 32,822 sf A (Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN 65G 65G (Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN (Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN (Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN (Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN 65G 65G(Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN (Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN(Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN A A A A A A A A A A A A A

DALE STREET LA PALMA AVE
4'
4'
20' 63'-8" 20'-1"
15'-3" 20'-4" 12'
20'-8"
12'-1" 25'-0" 24'-0" 20'-6" 46'-0"
15'-4" 18'-0"
30'-3" 10C 11C 12C 13C1F 5G14G 6F 8B 9C 4D 3E 2E 7A
24'-0" 24' 24'-0" 24'-0" 24'-0"
24'-0" 14' 14' 11'-6" 11'-6" 25'-2" 3'-0"6'-10"
3'-0" 6'-10" 3'-0" laddering pad4'-9 1/2"
14'-0"
23'-10" A1.3 LADDERING EXHIBIT 0 15 30 60 Architecture + Planning 888.456.5849 ktgy.com DALE AND LA PALMA BUENA PARK, CA #2023-0806 SCHEMATIC DESIGN JULY 1, 2024 La Palma Ave Dale Street SITE PLAN LEGEND LADDER PAD SETBACK AT RESCUE OPENINGS. SEE LADDERING PAD DETAILS PER OCFA E-04 1A Building Number Building Type Unit Number Plan Type d=(h/5)+2 4.8'=(14/5)+2 6.77'=(23'-10"/5)+2 Right Elevation Left Elevation 4 7 5 6
9'-1" 8'-6" 10 8 1 2 39'-1" Roof Plan Scale: 1/16"=1'-0" 11 4:12 4:12 4:12
4:12 Front Elevation Rear Elevation MATERIAL LEGEND 1. Concrete S-Tile Roof 2. Stucco 3. Stucco Over Foam Trim 4. Garage Doors 5. Iron Railing 6. Light Fixture 7. Vinyl Windows 8. Shutters 9. Gable Accents 10. Entry Door 11. Stucco Over Foam Corbels 12. Awning 9 2 12 4:12 4:12 4:12 4:12
4:12 4:12 4:12 4:12 4:12 4:12
30' Max to Eave
33'-10" 3:12
4:12 4:12
4:12 4:12 Perimeter wall per landscape Patio wall per landscape A2.0 ELEVATIONS 0 4 8 16 BUILDING A Architecture + Planning 888.456.5849 ktgy.com DALE AND LA PALMA BUENA PARK, CA #2023-0806 SCHEMATIC DESIGN JULY 1, 2024 Right Elevation Left Elevation Roof Plan Scale: 1/16"=1'-0" Front Elevation Rear Elevation MATERIAL LEGEND 1. Concrete S-Tile Roof 2. Stucco 3. Stucco Over Foam Trim 4. Garage Doors 5. Iron Railing 6. Light Fixture 7. Vinyl Windows 8. Shutters 9. Gable Accents 10. Entry Door 11. Stucco Over Foam Corbels 12. Awning 4 75 10 6 8 1 2 3 11 9 2 12 9'-1" 8'-6" 9'-1" 4:12 4:12
4:12
4:12 4:12 4:12 4:12 4:12 4:12 4:12 4:12 4:12 4:12
4:12
4:12 4:12
4:12
4:12
33'-10"
30' Max to Eave 3:12 3:12
4:12 4:12
4:12 4:12 4:12 4:12 Perimeter wall per landscape Perimeter wall per landscape Patio wall per landscape A2.1 ELEVATIONS 0 4 8 16 BUILDING B Architecture + Planning 888.456.5849 ktgy.com DALE AND LA PALMA BUENA PARK, CA #2023-0806 SCHEMATIC DESIGN JULY 1, 2024 Right Elevation Left Elevation Roof Plan Scale: 1/16"=1'-0" Front Elevation Rear Elevation MATERIAL LEGEND 1. Concrete S-Tile Roof 2. Stucco 3. Stucco Over Foam Trim 4. Garage Doors 5. Iron Railing 6. Light Fixture 7. Vinyl Windows 8. Shutters 9. Gable Accents 10. Entry Door 11. Stucco Over Foam Corbels 12. Awning 4 7 5 10 6 8 12 1 3 211 9 3 9'-1" 8'-6" 9'-1"
4:12
4:12 4:12 4:12 4:12 4:12
4:12
4:12
4:12 4:12 4:12
4:12
4:12 4:12 4:12
37'-7"
30' Max to Eave
4:12
4:12 Perimeter wall per landscape
29'-6" 2 A2.2 ELEVATIONS 0 4 8 16 BUILDING C Architecture + Planning 888.456.5849 ktgy.com DALE AND LA PALMA BUENA PARK, CA #2023-0806 SCHEMATIC DESIGN JULY 1, 2024 Right Elevation (enhanced) Left Elevation Roof Plan Scale: 1/16"=1'-0" Front Elevation Rear Elevation MATERIAL LEGEND 1. Concrete S-Tile Roof 2. Stucco 3. Stucco Over Foam Trim 4. Garage Doors 5. Iron Railing 6. Light Fixture 7. Vinyl Windows 8. Shutters 9. Gable Accents 10. Entry Door 11. Stucco Over Foam Corbels 12. Awning 4 7 5 10 6 8 2 1 2 3 11 9 9'-1" 8'-6" 9'-1" 4:12
4:12
4:12 4:12
4:12
4:12
4:12
4:12
4:12
4:12 4:12 4:12
4:12
4:12
4:12 4:12 4:12 4:12 4:12 4:12 4:12 4:12
37'-7"
30' Max to Eave
4:12
4:12
29'-6" Perimeter wall per landscape 12 A2.3 ELEVATIONS 0 4 8 16 BUILDING D Architecture + Planning 888.456.5849 ktgy.com DALE AND LA PALMA BUENA PARK, CA #2023-0806 SCHEMATIC DESIGN JULY 1, 2024 Right Elevation Left Elevation Roof Plan Scale: 1/16"=1'-0" Front Elevation Rear Elevation MATERIAL LEGEND 1. Concrete S-Tile Roof 2. Stucco 3. Stucco Over Foam Trim 4. Garage Doors 5. Iron Railing 6. Light Fixture 7. Vinyl Windows 8. Shutters 9. Gable Accents 10. Entry Door 11. Stucco Over Foam Corbels 12. Awning 4 7 5 10 6 8 2 1 2 3 11 9 9'-1" 8'-6" 9'-1" 4:12
4:12
4:12
4:12 4:12
4:12 4:12 4:12 4:12 4:12 4:12
4:12
4:12
4:12
4:12
4:12
4:12
4:12 4:12
4:12
4:12 4:12
4:12
4:12
37'-7" 4:12
30' Max to Eave 12 A2.4 ELEVATIONS 0 4 8 16 BUILDING E Architecture + Planning 888.456.5849 ktgy.com DALE AND LA PALMA BUENA PARK, CA #2023-0806 SCHEMATIC DESIGN JULY 1, 2024 Right Enhanced Elevation @ bldg #2 Facing Dale Street Left Enhanced Elevation @ bldg #3 Facing drive aisle entry from La Palma Avenue A2.5 ELEVATIONS BUILDING E ENHANCED Architecture + Planning 888.456.5849 ktgy.com DALE AND LA PALMA BUENA PARK, CA #2023-0806 SCHEMATIC DESIGN JULY 1, 2024 0 4 8 16 Right Elevation Left Elevation Roof Plan Scale: 1/16"=1'-0" Front Elevation Rear Elevation MATERIAL LEGEND 1. Concrete S-Tile Roof 2. Stucco 3. Stucco Over Foam Trim 4. Garage Doors 5. Iron Railing 6. Light Fixture 7. Vinyl Windows 8. Shutters 9. Gable Accents 10. Entry Door 11. Stucco Over Foam Corbels 12. Awning 4 7 5 10 6 8 2 1 2 3 11 9 9'-1" 8'-6" 9'-1"
37'-7" 4:12
4:12
4:12
4:12 4:12
4:12 4:12 4:12 4:12 4:12 4:12
4:124:12
4:12
4:12
4:12
4:12
4:12
4:12
4:12
4:12 4:12
4:12
4:12 4:12 4:12 4:12 4:12
4:12 4:12
30' Max to Eave A2.6 ELEVATIONS 0 4 8 16 BUILDING F Architecture + Planning 888.456.5849 ktgy.com DALE AND LA PALMA BUENA PARK, CA #2023-0806 SCHEMATIC DESIGN JULY 1, 2024 Right Enhanced Elevation @ bldg #1 Facing drive aisle entry from Dale Street Left Enhanced Elevation @ bldg #1 Facing corner of La Palma Avenue and Dale Street A2.7 ELEVATIONS BUILDING F ENHANCED Architecture + Planning 888.456.5849 ktgy.com DALE AND LA PALMA BUENA PARK, CA #2023-0806 SCHEMATIC DESIGN JULY 1, 2024 0 4 8 16 Front Elevation Right Elevation Rear Elevation Left Elevation MATERIAL LEGEND 1. Concrete S-Tile Roof 2. Stucco 3. Stucco Over Foam Trim 4. Garage Doors 5. Iron Railing 6. Light Fixture 7. Vinyl Windows 8. Shutters 9. Gable Accents 10. Entry Door 11. Stucco Over Foam Corbels 12. Awning Roof Plan Scale: 1/16"=1'-0" 4 7 5 10 6 8 1 3 11 2 9 2 9'-1" 8'-6" 9'-1" 4:12
4:12
4:12
4:12 4:12
4:12 4:12 4:12 4:12 4:12 4:12
4:12
4:12
4:12
4:12
4:12
4:12
4:12 4:12
4:12
4:12 4:12
4:12
4:12 4:12
4:12
4:12
4:12 4:12 4:12
37'-7" 4:12
30' Max to Eave
4:12
4:12 A2.8 ELEVATIONS 0 4 8 16 BUILDING G Architecture + Planning 888.456.5849 ktgy.com DALE AND LA PALMA BUENA PARK, CA #2023-0806 SCHEMATIC DESIGN JULY 1, 2024 36'-6"
87'-0" 38'-6"
84'-6" 38'-0"
84'-6" First Floor Building A Second Floor Building A Third Floor Building A P5P5P5P5 P5P5P5P5 P5P5P5P5 Building A AWNING ABOVE TYP., 4'X6' CLEAR TYP., Architecture + Planning 888.456.5849 ktgy.com DALE AND LA PALMA BUENA PARK, CA #2023-0806 SCHEMATIC DESIGN JULY 1, 2024 A3.0 BUILDING PLANS 0 4 8 16 BUILDING A CU-24-1 RECEIVED JUL 3 2024 PLANNING DIV 36'-6"
108'-2" 38'-6"
105'-8" 38'-0"
105'-8" First Floor Building B Second Floor Building B Third Floor Building B P5P5P5P5 P5P5P5P5 P5P5P5P5P5 P5 P5 Building B AWNING ABOVE TYP., 4'X6' CLEAR TYP., Architecture + Planning 888.456.5849 ktgy.com DALE AND LA PALMA BUENA PARK, CA #2023-0806 SCHEMATIC DESIGN JULY 1, 2024 A3.1 BUILDING PLANS 0 4 8 16 BUILDING B P4 P1 P4 P3 P3 P1 49'-0"
83'-8" 51'-0"
84'-8" 51'-0"
63'-6" First Floor Building C Second Floor Building C Third Floor Building C P6 P2 P6 P2 P6 P2 P4 P1 Building C Roof Below 4'X6' CLEAR TYP., CANOPY ABOVE TYP., AWNING ABOVE TYP., ROOF OVERHANG ABOVE Architecture + Planning 888.456.5849 ktgy.com DALE AND LA PALMA BUENA PARK, CA #2023-0806 SCHEMATIC DESIGN JULY 1, 2024 A3.2 BUILDING PLANS 0 4 8 16 BUILDING C First Floor Building D Second Floor Building D Third Floor Building D P3 P3 49'-0" 120'-6" 49'-0"
118'-0" 47'-0"
96'-10" P2P2P2 P2 P2 P2 P2 P2 P2 P6 P6 P6 P6 P6 P6 P6 P6 P6 Building D Roof Below AWNING ABOVE TYP., 4'X6' CLEAR TYP., CANOPY ABOVE TYP., Architecture + Planning 888.456.5849 ktgy.com DALE AND LA PALMA BUENA PARK, CA #2023-0806 SCHEMATIC DESIGN JULY 1, 2024 A3.3 BUILDING PLANS 0 4 8 16 BUILDING D 46'-0"
131'-8" 48'-0"
129'-2" 47'-0"
129'-2" First Floor Building E Second Floor Building E Third Floor Building E P2 P2 P2 P6 P6 P6 P2 P2 P2 P6 P6 P6 P2 P2 P2 P6 P6 P6 P2 P2 P2 P6 P6 P6 Building E AWNING ABOVE TYP., 4'X6' CLEAR TYP., CANOPY ABOVE TYP., Architecture + Planning 888.456.5849 ktgy.com DALE AND LA PALMA BUENA PARK, CA #2023-0806 SCHEMATIC DESIGN JULY 1, 2024 A3.4 BUILDING PLANS 0 4 8 16 BUILDING E 47'-0"
125'-8" 51'-0"
127'-2" 51'-0"
127'-2" First Floor Building F Second Floor Building F Third Floor Building F P4X P1X P1 P4 P1 P4 P2 P2 P2 P6 P6 P6 P2 P2 P2 P6 P6 P6 P4 P1 P1 P4 P4 P1 Building F AWNING ABOVE TYP., 4'X6' CLEAR TYP., CANOPY ABOVE TYP., ROOF OVERHANG ABOVE ROOF OVERHANG ABOVE Architecture + Planning 888.456.5849 ktgy.com DALE AND LA PALMA BUENA PARK, CA #2023-0806 SCHEMATIC DESIGN JULY 1, 2024 A3.5 BUILDING PLANS 0 4 8 16 BUILDING F 51'-0" 160'-6"
47'-0" 160'-0" First Floor Building G Second Floor Building G P2 P2 P6 P6 P1X-1 P1 P4X-1 P4 P2 P2 P6 P6 P2 P2 P6 P6 P2 P2 P6 P6 Building G CANOPY ABOVE TYP., 4'X6' CLEAR TYP., AWNING ABOVE TYP., ROOF OVERHANG ABOVE Architecture + Planning 888.456.5849 ktgy.com DALE AND LA PALMA BUENA PARK, CA #2023-0806 SCHEMATIC DESIGN JULY 1, 2024 A3.6 BUILDING PLANS 0 4 8 16 BUILDING G 51'-0" 160'-6" Third Floor Building G P2P6 P2 P2 P2 P1 P4 P6 P6 P6 Architecture + Planning 888.456.5849 ktgy.com DALE AND LA PALMA BUENA PARK, CA #2023-0806 SCHEMATIC DESIGN JULY 1, 2024 A3.7 BUILDING PLANS 0 4 8 16 BUILDING G A (Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN 65G 65G (Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN (Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN (Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN (Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN 65G 65G
(Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN
(Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN(Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN A A A A A A A A A A A A A

DALE STREET LA PALMA AVE
4'
4' 22 1 1 Section 1 Section 2 ⅊ Private Drive Existing Residential Line of Sight Existing Residential ⅊ Line of Sight Entry Drive Plan 5 Building A Plan 1 Plan 2 Plan 6 Plan 3 Building C ±20'-8" ±20'-0" ±12'-0" ±26'-0" ±37'-10"
±29'-5"
17'-0"
±34'-9"
26'-10"
17'-0" Front Elevation Building A Left Elevation Building C Perimeter wall per landscape Perimeter wall per landscape 6'-6" 2'-6" 205 CF Total Overhead Storage 4'x8'x2.5'=80 CF 5'-6"
6'-0"
6'-0" A4.0 BUILDING SECTIONS 0 4 8 16 Key Map 1"=80' Architecture + Planning 888.456.5849 ktgy.com DALE AND LA PALMA BUENA PARK, CA #2023-0806 SCHEMATIC DESIGN JULY 1, 2024 Entry Dn. Great Room 14'-1"x13'-1" Garage 20'-2"x21'-2" Balcony 13'-10"x6'-4" 87 SQ. FT. Lau. Kitchen Up W.I.C. Primary Bedroom 12'-8"x13'-7" Bath 2 Dn. Bed 2 10'-7"x11'-11" Entry Up Garage 10'-9"x46'-3" Up 29'-2" 29'-2" 30'-2" 23'-11"
21'-11"
23'-11" 16'-1"
47'-0" Third Floor Second Floor First Floor- Plan 1 First Floor-Plan 1x Coat Dining Room 9'-7"x16'-5" Primary Bath PLAN 1x NET S.F. 2 BR/2.5 BA 1ST FLOOR 93 SQ. FT. 2ND FLOOR 547 SQ. FT. 3RD FLOOR 582 SQ. FT. TOTAL LIVING 1222 SQ. FT. GARAGE 541 SQ. FT. PLAN 1 NET S.F. 2 BR/2.5 BA 1ST FLOOR 104 SQ. FT. 2ND FLOOR 547 SQ. FT. 3RD FLOOR 582 SQ. FT. TOTAL LIVING 1233 SQ. FT. GARAGE 507 SQ. FT. W.I.C Storage
200 CF Storage 205 CF 205 CF Total 20'-2" 10'-9" 8'-2"x3'-5" 28 SQ. FT. 4x6' CLR. 4x6' CLR. applies to Plan 1 and 1x applies to Plan 1 and 1x Architecture + Planning 888.456.5849 ktgy.com DALE AND LA PALMA BUENA PARK, CA #2023-0806 SCHEMATIC DESIGN JULY 1, 2024 A5.0 PLAN 1 & 1X FLOOR PLANS 0 2 4 8 Coat Low Roof Second Floor First Floor EntryGreat Room 15'-1"x16'-8" Primary Bedroom 14'-7"x12'-10" Bed 2 10'-1"x10'-4" Garage 20'-5"x20'-4" Pwdr. Bath 2 Primary Bath Lau. Kitchen Bed 3 10'-1"x11'-6" DN UP 49'-0" 21'-0"
47'-0" 21'-0" Lin. PLAN 3 NET S.F. 3 BR/2.5 BA 1ST FLOOR 538 SQ. FT. 2ND FLOOR 881 SQ. FT. TOTAL LIVING 1419 SQ. FT. GARAGE 443 SQ. FT. W.H. W.I.C Pantry Lin. Storage 200 CF 200 CF Total 20'-4" 4x6' CLR. 4x6' CLR. A5.1 PLAN 3 FLOOR PLANS 0 2 4 8 Architecture + Planning 888.456.5849 ktgy.com DALE AND LA PALMA BUENA PARK, CA #2023-0806 SCHEMATIC DESIGN JULY 1, 2024 Entry Dn. Great Room 17'-11"x20'-8" Garage 20'-4"x24'-4" Balcony 11'-3"x11'-2" 124 SQ. FT. Lau. Kitchen Up Primary Bedroom 13'-4"x10'-9" Bath 2 Bed 3 10'-8"x10'-4" Entry Up Garage 10'-4"x39'-7" Up 31'-2" 31'-2" 28'-2" 26'-11"
24'-11"
26'-11" 14'-5"
47'-0" Bed 2 10'-8"x10'-1" Pwdr. Third Floor Second Floor First Floor - Plan 4 First Floor - Plan 4x Elec. Cab Coat Coat Lin. Primary Bath PLAN 4x NET S.F. 3 BR/2.5 BA 1ST FLOOR 163 SQ. FT. 2ND FLOOR 651 SQ. FT. 3RD FLOOR 717 SQ. FT. TOTAL LIVING 1531 SQ. FT. GARAGE 482 SQ. FT. PLAN 4 NET S.F. 3 BR/2.5 BA 1ST FLOOR 134 SQ. FT. 2ND FLOOR 651 SQ. FT. 3RD FLOOR 717 SQ. FT. TOTAL LIVING 1502 SQ. FT. GARAGE 533 SQ. FT. W.I.C Dn. 10'-4" Storage 200CF 200CF Total Storage 270 CF 270 CF Total 20'-4" 17'-6"x2'-2" 38 SQ. FT. 4x6' CLR. 4x6' CLR. applies to Plan 4 and 4x applies to Plan 4 and 4x 8'-0" A5.2 PLAN 4 & 4X FLOOR PLANS Architecture + Planning 888.456.5849 ktgy.com DALE AND LA PALMA BUENA PARK, CA #2023-0806 SCHEMATIC DESIGN JULY 1, 2024 Primary Bath Second Floor First Floor
36'-6" 21'-0" PLAN 5 NET S.F. 3 BR/3.5 BA 1ST FLOOR 287 SQ. FT. 2ND FLOOR 673 SQ. FT. 3RD FLOOR 596 SQ. FT. TOTAL LIVING 1556 SQ. FT. GARAGE 454 SQ. FT. 21'-0" Third Floor 21'-0" 38'-0"
38'-6" Garage 20'-5"x20'-4" Bed 3 10'-1"x10'-2" Bed 2 10'-6"x10'-7" Primary Bedroom 13'-0"x12'-6" W.I.C Entry Up Bath 3 Bath 2 DN DN Lau. Lin. Great Room 12'-9"x11'-10" Kitchen Pwdr. Pantry Coat Up Dining 16'-10"x9'-11" W.H. Storage 125 CF 205 CF Total Overhead Storage 4'x8'x2.5'=80CF 205 CF Total 20'-4" Balcony 9'-6"x7'-5" 70 SQ. FT. 4x6' CLR. Canopy above A5.3 PLAN 5 FLOOR PLANS Architecture + Planning 888.456.5849 ktgy.com DALE AND LA PALMA BUENA PARK, CA #2023-0806 SCHEMATIC DESIGN JULY 1, 2024 0 2 4 8 Dn. Coat Second Floor First FloorEntry Bed 3 10'-9"x10'-4" Primary Bedroom 13'-0"x13'-5" Bed 2 10'-6"x11'-8" Garage 10'-8"x40'-2" Bath 3 Bath 2 Kitchen Dn. 46'-0" Plan 2 11'-3"
Plan 6
25'-7" 32'-2" Lin. PLAN 2 NET S.F. 2 BR/2.5 BA 1ST FLOOR 128 SQ. FT. 2ND FLOOR 611 SQ. FT. 3RD FLOOR 580 SQ. FT. TOTAL LIVING 1319 SQ. FT. GARAGE 454 SQ. FT. W.H. W.I.C Plan 6 20'-9" PLAN 6 NET S.F. 3 BR/3.5 BA 1ST FLOOR 380 SQ. FT. 2ND FLOOR 652 SQ. FT. 3RD FLOOR 669 SQ. FT. TOTAL LIVING 1701 SQ. FT. GARAGE 441 SQ. FT. Third Floor Entry 32'-2" Primary Bedroom 12'-3"x13'-5" Bed 2 10'-6"x10'-10" Primary Bath W.I.C Great Room 13'-4"x12'-9" Dining 12'-9"x10'-5" Great Room 15'-2"x14'-5" Dining 9'-4"x18'-3" Bath 2Lau. Lau. Kitchen Garage 20'-2"x20'-8" W.H. 48'-0"
Plan 2
22'-3"
Plan 6
25'-7"
47'-0"
Plan 2
21'-3" Storage Coat Lin. Dn. Pwdr. Pwdr. Up DN Up Storage 160 CF 240 CF Total Overhead Storage 4'x8'x2.5'=80CF 240 CF Total Storage 200CF 200 CF Total 40'-2" 16RUP 16RUP PLAN 6 PLAN 2 PLAN 6PLAN 2 PLAN 6 PLAN 2 Balcony 5'-2"x12'-11" 67 SQ. FT. Balcony 5'-2"x15'-11" 82 SQ. FT. 4x6' CLR. 4x6' CLR. A5.4 PLAN 2 & 6 FLOOR PLANS 0 2 4 8 Architecture + Planning 888.456.5849 ktgy.com DALE AND LA PALMA BUENA PARK, CA #2023-0806 SCHEMATIC DESIGN JULY 1, 2024 Architecture + Planning 888.456.5849 ktgy.com DALE AND LA PALMA BUENA PARK, CA #2023-0806 SCHEMATIC DESIGN JULY 1, 2024 A6.0 COLOR AND MATERIAL BOARD

SEATING AND BBQ

ALUMAWOOD TRELLIS & TRASH ENCLOSURE

BIKE RACK
SCALE: SEE SHEET
09/30/24
EXP. DATE

SIGNATURE
LLA 5508
O
I NR
I
L I
PE C N
C
A
C
M TAKA
07/03/24 BRANDYWINE HOMES CITY OF BUENA PARK, CA DALE AND LA PALMA ENTITLEMENT PLANS 28924 OLD TOWN FRONT STREET, SUITE 202 TEMECULA, CA 92590 P (844) WEILAND, XT 701 F (619) 675-3426 EMAIL - [email protected] CORPORATE OFFICE 291 SIERRA WAVE SWALL MEADOWS, CA 93514 DATE: 07/03/2024
JOB # 23-040a
DRAWN: KT, BB, YH
0/0/2024, 02/07/2024, 04/8/24, 04/24/24, 05/03/24, 07/02/24, 07/03/24 O
C A L
E
SED L
I
S
T
ET
I
SHEET:

OF 4 REVISIONS DATE
DATE
A
F
F
ETATS
A
C
N
H
D A
R
I K
K
WEILAND DESIGN GROUP, INC. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE + PLANNING + CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT 3 LANDSCAPE CONCEPT IMAGES

TREE OPTIONS
Arbutus 'Marina' /
Marina Strawberry Tree
Lyonothamnus f. ssp. a. /
Fern-Leaf Catalina Ironwood
Lophostemon confertus
/ Brisbane Box
Bauhinia sp. /
Orchid Tree
GinNgo biloba /
Maidenhair Tree
Platanus racemosa /
California Sycamore
Ulmus parYifolia /
Chinese Elm
Lagerstroemia indica /
Crape Myrtle
Magnolia grandiflora /
Southern Magnolia
Washingtonia
filifera /
California Fan
Palm

PLAY EQUIPMENT
Heteromeles arbutifolia /
Toyon

WALL AND FENCING
NOTE: IMAGES PROVIDED HEREIN ARE CONCEPTUAL AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE.

Cercis occidentalis /
Western Redbud
Tristaniopsis laurina /
Water Gum
Prunus caroliniana /
Carolina Cherry Laurel
Laurus 'Saratoga' /
Saratoga Laurel
Prunus i. ssp. lyonii
/ Catalina Cherry
Syagrus r. /
Queen Palm
L-03

A A A A A A A A A A A A A A

DALE STREET LA PALMA AVE
65G 65G (Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN
65G (Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN (Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN (Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN 65G (Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN (Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN(Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN (Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN 65G 65G 20' 63'-8" 20'-1"
15'-3" 20'-4" 12'
20'-8"
12'-1" 25'-0" 24'-0" 20'-6" 46'-0"
15'-4" 18'-0"
30'-3" 10C 11C 12C 13C1F 5G14G 6F 8B 9C 4D 3E 2E 7A
24'-0" 24' 24'-0" 24'-0" 24'-0"
24'-0" 14' 14' 11'-6" 11'-6" 25'-2" A1.0 SITE PLAN 0 15 30 60 Architecture + Planning 888.456.5849 ktgy.com DALE AND LA PALMA BUENA PARK, CA #2023-0806 SCHEMATIC DESIGN JULY 9, 2024 1A Building Number Building Type Unit Number Plan Type 5 1 27 10 11 7 10 10 11 10 9 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 9 9 9 9 1212 12 12 6 6 6 6 8 8 8 11 5 13 3 11 11 41111 11 11 1111 11 496 Site Summary Site Area: 3.87 Acres; 168,536 sf Dwelling Units: 93 Units Net Density: 24 du/ac Product Type: 2 & 3 Story Townhomes Occupancy Type: R2 Construction Type: Residential: Type VB Sprinkler Type: NFPA 13 Building Height: 38' Lot Coverage: ±69,014 sf (41%) Total Building Area: ±187,534 sf Building Setbacks: Required Proposed Front (Dale Street): 19' 15' Min. Street Side (La Palma): 19' 15' Min. Rear (East): 10' 12' at 2 story, 20' at 3 story Side (South): 10' 15' at 2 story, 20' at 3 story Unit Summary Plan Type Garage Stories Net Area # 1 2 bd/2.5 ba Side by Side 3 1,233 sf 7 Du 1x 2 bd/2.5 ba Tandem 3 1,222 sf 4 Du 2 2 bd/2.5 ba Tandem 3 1,319 sf 28 Du 3 3 bd/2.5 ba Side by Side 2 1,419 sf 6 Du 4 3 bd/2.5 ba Side by Side 3 1,502 sf 7 Du 4x 3 bd/2.5 ba Tandem 3 1,531 sf 4 Du 5 3 bd/3.5 ba Side by Side 3 1,556 sf 9 Du 6 3 bd/3.5 ba Side by Side 3 1,701 sf 28 Du Total 93 Du Parking Summary:* *Per AB 2097, no minimum parking required for projects within a half-mile radius of a major transit stop. For comparison, the parking standard per State Density Bonus Law would be: 2 Bed: 39 Du x 1.5 Sp/Unit: 59 Spaces 3 Bed: 54 Du x 1.5 Sp/Unit: 81 Spaces Total Spaces: 140 Spaces (1.5/Unit) Parking Provided: Private Garages: 186 Spaces Open Parking: 26 Spaces Total: 212 Spaces (2.28/Unit) Legend 1. Property Line 2. Parking Space - 9'x18' 3. Accessible Parking Space 4. Trash Enclosure 5. Accessible Path of Travel 6. Accessible Ground Floor Unit 7. Decorative Paving (Stamped Concrete or equal) Density Bonus Calculation: Site Area=3.87 Acres x 24 du/ac = 92 13% moderate affordable income provided, allows 8% density bonus 8% of 92.928 = 7.43 additional units 92.928+7.43 =100.36 du ≈100 du Allowable Open Space Summary: Open Area - See Sheet A1.1 Required Total Open Area: 67,414 sf (40% Min.) Provided Open Area: 53,688 sf (31.1%) Common Usable Open Area - See Sheet A1.2 Required: 12,300 sf Provided: 32,822 sf Utility Notes: 1. Control exterior electrical and hose bibs with appropriate metal locking covers and padlocks. 2. Individual sub-meters for water provided at each unit. 3. Electric meters and fire riser cabinets at each building- See keynote 11. 4. Gas service is not provided. 5. For additional utility information, refer to Civil Sheet 4 of 4. 8. Affordable Units 9. Transformers 10. AC Condensers 11. Electrical Cabinet and Fire Riser 12. Existing Driveway to be Removed 13. Turning Path of a Toyota 4Runner 14. Proposed Raised Landscape Median 14 14

4' 4'
A
A

A A A A A A A A A A A
A
(Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN 65G 65G(Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN (Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN(Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN
(Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN
65G 65G
(Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN (Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN (Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN

10.0000

10.0000
610.0000
F
1 E
2 E
3 D
4 F
6 G
5 G
14 A
7 B
8 C
9 C
10 C
11 C
12 C
13 OUT
IN
FEBCOLF876V6"
FEBCOLF886V4"
OUTIN
OUT
IN
FEBCO
LF876V
6"
4"
LF886V
FEBCO
OUTIN
1" M ETER P ER STD . 516 M ETER BO X A60048520.25" X 13.25" PER SP EC SH ET 1 " W A T S 0 09 Q TS E R I ES
4'
4'
2'
P5-1 P5-1 P5-1 P5-1 P5-1 P5-1 P5-1 P5-1 P5-1
P2-1 P6-1
P1-1
P3-1
22 cu ft
SBS
P4-1
P2-1 P6-1
P1-1
P3-1
22 cu ft
SBS
P4-1
P2-1 P6-1
P1-1
P3-1
22 cu ft
SBS
P4-1
P2-1 P6-1
P1-1
P3-1
22 cu ft
SBS
P4-1
P2-1 P6-1
P1-1
P3-1
22 cu ft
SBS
P4-1
P2-1 P6-1
P3-1
22 cu ft
SBS
P2-1 P6-1 P2-1 P6-1 P2-1 P6-1 P2-1 P6-1 P2-1 P6-1 P2-1 P6-1 P2-1 P6-1 P2-1 P6-1 P2-1 P6-1 P2-1 P6-1 P2-1 P6-1
P1-1
P1X-1
P4-1
P4X-1 P2-1 P6-1 288 cu. ft. storage
P6-1 P2-1
P1X-1 P4X-1 P6-1 P2-1 P6-1 P2-1 P6-1 P2-1
288 cu. ft. storage
P6-1 P2-1
P1X-1P4X-1 P6-1 P2-1 P6-1 P2-1 P6-1 P2-1
(Opening)
81W"x54D"
4YD BIN
(Opening)
81W"x54D"
4YD BIN
(Opening)
81W"x54D"
4YD BIN
(Opening)
81W"x54D"
4YD BIN
65G 65G
(Opening)
81W"x54D"
4YD BIN
(Opening)
81W"x54D"
4YD BIN
(Opening)
81W"x54D"
4YD BIN
(Opening)
81W"x54D"
4YD BIN
65G 65G
P2-1 P6-1
P1-1
P1X-1
P4-1
P4X-1 P2-1 P6-1

20.25" X 13.25" PER SPEC SHEETMETER BOX A60004851" METER PER STD. 516 1" WATTS 009QT SERIES O U T
I N
"LF876V 6FEBCO
"LF886V 4FEBCO

O U TI N
O U T
I N
FEBCO "LF876V 6
LF886V 4 "
FEBCO

O U TI N
2'
4'
4'

10.0000

10.0000
610.0000
F1
E
2 E
3 D
4 F
6 G
5 G
14 A
7 B
8 C
9 C
10 C
11 C
12 C
13 P5-1 P5-1 P5-1 P5-1 P5-1 P5-1 P5-1 P5-1 P5-1
P2-1 P6-1
P1-1
P3-1
P4-1
P2-1 P6-1
P1-1
P3-1
P4-1
P2-1 P6-1
P1-1
P3-1
P4-1
P2-1 P6-1
P1-1
P3-1
P4-1
P2-1 P6-1
P1-1
P3-1
P4-1
P2-1 P6-1
P3-1
P2-1 P6-1 P2-1 P6-1 P2-1 P6-1 P2-1 P6-1 P2-1 P6-1 P2-1 P6-1 P2-1 P6-1 P2-1 P6-1 P2-1 P6-1 P2-1 P6-1 P2-1 P6-1
P1-1
P1X-1
P4-1
P4X-1 P2-1 P6-1
P6-1 P2-1
P1X-1
P4X-1
P6-1 P2-1 P6-1 P2-1 P6-1 P2-1
288 cu. ft. storage
P6-1 P2-1
P1X-1P4X-1
P6-1 P2-1 P6-1 P2-1 P6-1 P2-1
288 cu. ft. storage
P2-1 P6-1
P1-1
P1X-1
P4-1
P4X-1 P2-1 P6-1
22 cu ft SBS
22 cu ft SBS
22 cu ft SBS
22 cu ft SBS
22 cu ft SBS
22 cu ft SBS
65G65G
(Opening)
81W"x54D"
4YD BIN
(Opening)
81W"x54D"
4YD BIN
(Opening)
81W"x54D"
4YD BIN
(Opening)
81W"x54D"
4YD BIN
65G 65G
(Opening)
81W"x54D"
4YD BIN
(Opening)
81W"x54D"
4YD BIN
(Opening)
81W"x54D"
4YD BIN
(Opening)
81W"x54D"
4YD BIN

20.25" X 13.25" PER SPEC SHEETMETER BOX A60004851" METER PER STD. 516 1" WATTS 009QT SERIES O U T
I N
LF876V 6"FEBCO
LF886V 4"FEBCO

O U TI N
O U T
I N
FEBCO
LF876V 6"
LF886V 4"
FEBCO

O U TI N
2'
4'
4'

10.0000

10.0000
610.0000
F1
E
2 E
3 D
4 F
6 G
5 G
14 A
7 B
8 C
9 C
10 C
11 C
12 C
13 P5-1 P5-1 P5-1 P5-1 P5-1 P5-1 P5-1 P5-1 P5-1
P2-1 P6-1
P1-1
P3-1
P4-1
P2-1 P6-1
P1-1
P3-1
P4-1
P2-1 P6-1
P1-1
P3-1
P4-1
P2-1 P6-1
P1-1
P3-1
P4-1
P2-1 P6-1
P1-1
P3-1
P4-1
P2-1 P6-1
P3-1
P2-1 P6-1 P2-1 P6-1 P2-1 P6-1 P2-1 P6-1 P2-1 P6-1 P2-1 P6-1 P2-1 P6-1 P2-1 P6-1 P2-1 P6-1 P2-1 P6-1 P2-1 P6-1
P1-1
P1X-1
P4-1
P4X-1 P2-1 P6-1
P2-1 P6-1
P1-1
P1X-1
P4-1
P4X-1 P2-1 P6-1
P6-1 P2-1
P1X-1
P4X-1
P6-1 P2-1 P6-1 P2-1 P6-1 P2-1
288 cu. ft. storage
P6-1 P2-1
P1X-1P4X-1
P6-1 P2-1 P6-1 P2-1 P6-1 P2-1
288 cu. ft. storage
22 cu ft SBS
22 cu ft SBS
22 cu ft SBS
22 cu ft SBS
22 cu ft SBS
22 cu ft SBS
65G65G
(Opening)
81W"x54D"
4YD BIN
(Opening)
81W"x54D"
4YD BIN
(Opening)
81W"x54D"
4YD BIN
(Opening)
81W"x54D"
4YD BIN
65G 65G
(Opening)
81W"x54D"
4YD BIN
(Opening)
81W"x54D"
4YD BIN
(Opening)
81W"x54D"
4YD BIN
(Opening)
81W"x54D"
4YD BIN

20.25" X 13.25" PER SPEC SHEETMETER BOX A60004851" METER PER STD. 516 1" WATTS 009QT SERIES O U T
I N
LF876V 6"FEBCO
LF886V 4"FEBCO

O U TI N
O U T
I N
FEBCO
LF876V 6"
LF886V 4"
FEBCO

O U TI N
2'
4'
4'

10.0000

10.0000
610.0000
F1
E
2 E
3 D
4 F
6 G
5 G
14 A
7 B
8 C
9 C
10 C
11 C
12 C
13 P5-1 P5-1 P5-1 P5-1 P5-1 P5-1 P5-1 P5-1 P5-1
P2-1 P6-1
P1-1
P3-1
P4-1
P2-1 P6-1
P1-1
P3-1
P4-1
P2-1 P6-1
P1-1
P3-1
P4-1
P2-1 P6-1
P1-1
P3-1
P4-1
P2-1 P6-1
P1-1
P3-1
P4-1
P2-1 P6-1
P3-1
P2-1 P6-1 P2-1 P6-1 P2-1 P6-1 P2-1 P6-1 P2-1 P6-1 P2-1 P6-1 P2-1 P6-1 P2-1 P6-1 P2-1 P6-1 P2-1 P6-1 P2-1 P6-1
P1-1
P1X-1
P4-1
P4X-1 P2-1 P6-1
P6-1 P2-1
P1X-1
P4X-1
P6-1 P2-1 P6-1 P2-1 P6-1 P2-1
288 cu. ft. storage
P6-1 P2-1
P1X-1P4X-1
P6-1 P2-1 P6-1 P2-1 P6-1 P2-1
288 cu. ft. storage
P2-1 P6-1
P1-1
P1X-1
P4-1
P4X-1 P2-1 P6-1
22 cu ft SBS
22 cu ft SBS
22 cu ft SBS
22 cu ft SBS
22 cu ft SBS
22 cu ft SBS
65G65G
(Opening)
81W"x54D"
4YD BIN
(Opening)
81W"x54D"
4YD BIN
(Opening)
81W"x54D"
4YD BIN
(Opening)
81W"x54D"
4YD BIN
65G 65G
(Opening)
81W"x54D"
4YD BIN
(Opening)
81W"x54D"
4YD BIN
(Opening)
81W"x54D"
4YD BIN
(Opening)
81W"x54D"
4YD BIN
A
A

A A A A A A A A A A A
A

0.91.11.8 1.42.7 0.5 0.7 0.9 0.6 1.0 0.9 1.5 2.82.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.3 0.6 0.8 1.6 4.41.7 0.4 0.5 0.7 0.9 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.6 3.4 5.61.1 0.3 0.7 1.0 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.1 1.3 1.90.8 0.4 0.2 0.8 2.7 6.4 5.7 3.5 4.0 4.2 4.0 3.1 2.8 4.9 3.9 4.1 2.7 3.4 4.5 3.9 3.5 2.6 3.7 2.6 1.3 1.0 1.5 2.3 2.4 2.1 1.2 1.0 1.20.9 0.4 0.3 0.7 1.8 2.9 2.8 2.2 2.0 2.0 1.8 1.6 1.7 1.9 1.9 1.7 1.6 1.8 2.0 1.9 1.7 1.6 1.6 1.4 1.0 1.0 1.9 2.9 3.0 2.6 1.5 1.0 1.4

1.2 0.4 0.3 0.6 1.2 1.7 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.1 1.0 1.1 1.0 0.8 1.1 2.1 2.9 3.3 2.7 1.7 1.3 2.01.9 0.5 0.3 0.8 1.8 2.9 2.9 2.3 2.1 2.0 1.8 1.6 1.7 1.9 1.9 1.7 1.6 1.8 2.0 1.9 1.7 1.6 1.6 1.4 1.0 1.0 1.8 2.9 3.0 2.6 1.5 1.3 2.1

2.7 0.6 0.4 0.9 2.7 6.4 5.9 3.5 4.1 4.2 4.1 3.1 2.8 4.9 3.9 4.1 2.8 3.4 4.5 4.0 3.5 2.7 3.7 2.6 1.3 1.0 1.3 2.0 1.9 1.8 1.2 1.4 2.43.0 0.6 0.7 0.9 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.6 3.2 5.4

2.7 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.6 0.7 0.8 1.6 3.32.7 0.5 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.6 0.7 1.4 3.52.9 0.5 0.6 0.9 0.6 0.9 0.8 1.2 2.12.7 1.1 0.81.9 0.41.4

1.0 1.31.9 2.82.8 5.1

0.5 1.2 2.7 4.7 5.2 3.7 3.1 3.9 5.6 5.5 4.1 2.3 1.0 0.4 0.4 0.9 2.0 3.7 5.60.4 1.1 2.2 3.9 5.3 5.1 4.4 3.1 2.8 3.2 4.8 5.2 3.4 1.9 0.9 0.4 0.4 0.8 1.7 3.0 4.9

1.7 2.9 3.3 3.4 3.1 2.4 2.3 2.5 3.2 3.2 2.6 1.5 0.8 0.3 0.3 0.7 1.4 2.3 3.21.6 2.5 2.9 2.9 2.7 2.2 2.0 2.3 2.8 2.8 2.3 1.4 0.7 0.2 0.3 0.6 1.3 2.2 2.81.6 2.9 3.9 4.0 3.2 2.3 2.0 2.4 3.4 3.7 2.7 1.4 0.7 0.3 0.3 0.6 1.3 2.4 3.5

0.3 0.9 1.7 3.5 5.2 5.4 4.0 2.6 2.2 2.8 4.4 5.4 5.0 3.2 1.6 0.9 0.4 0.4 0.7 1.4 2.9 4.8

1.9 3.3 4.3 4.4 3.8 2.8 2.4 3.1 4.0 3.9 4.3 3.2 1.8 0.9 0.5 0.4 0.8 1.6 2.9 4.12.1 3.7 5.0 5.0 4.3 3.1 2.5 3.3 4.6 3.9 5.0 3.5 1.8 0.9 0.5 0.4 0.8 1.6 3.2 4.7

0.3 0.8 1.9 3.5 5.0 4.5 4.1 3.0 2.4 3.2 4.4 4.8 3.2 1.7 0.9 0.6 0.5 0.8 1.4 3.0 4.5

1.3 2.0 2.5 2.3 2.8 2.4 2.2 2.5 2.8 2.6 2.0 1.3 0.8 0.6 0.6 0.8 1.1 1.9 2.5

0.9 1.8 2.4 2.3 2.0 2.3 2.5 1.4 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.8 1.7 1.6 1.5 1.6 1.40.3 3.3 3.1 2.6 3.3 1.0 1.8 1.4 1.00.1 4.6 4.1 2.7 4.3 0.9 1.6 1.2 0.80.0 1.9 1.1 0.9

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.7 0.8 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.9 1.2 1.2 1.2 0.6 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.6 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.8 0.7 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.5

2.1 2.3 2.01.1 1.2 1.1

1.1 1.6 2.2 2.3 2.0 1.41.1 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.1 1.0

1.5 2.01.6 2.61.8 3.01.9 3.02.0 2.91.8 3.01.6 2.81.4 2.2

1.0 1.51.2 2.11.3 2.41.3 2.21.2 1.6

1.1 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.2 1.01.1 1.7 2.2 2.4 2.0 1.5

1.6 2.2 2.3 2.11.0 1.1 1.2 1.1

2.3 3.52.3 3.82.2 3.7

2.1 2.11.8 1.81.3 1.3

1.6 2.2 2.3 2.11.0 1.1 1.2 1.1

4.0 2.5 2.0 3.3 3.8 2.3 2.2 3.6 3.5 1.9 1.8 2.52.9 2.4 2.2 2.7 2.8 2.3 2.2 2.8 2.7 2.1 2.4 4.34.2 2.6 2.1 3.5 4.0 2.4 2.3 3.8 3.7 2.2 2.2 2.73.4 2.4 2.1 3.0 3.3 2.3 2.2 3.2 3.1 2.1 2.3 3.32.7 2.4 2.2 2.5 2.6 2.3 2.2 2.6 2.6 2.2 2.4 4.14.6 3.0 2.5 3.9 4.4 2.8 2.7 4.2 4.1 2.5 2.3 2.65.0 3.4 2.8 4.2 4.7 3.1 3.0 4.5 4.3 2.7 2.4 3.2

5.6 3.4 2.8 4.7 5.3 3.1 2.9 5.1 5.0 2.7 2.6 4.13.4 2.7 2.4 3.1 3.3 2.6 2.5 3.2 3.1 2.3 2.3 2.63.1 2.4 2.1 2.8 2.9 2.3 2.2 2.9 2.8 2.1 2.3 3.24.7 2.5 1.9 3.9 4.5 2.2 2.0 4.4 4.3 2.0 2.3 4.12.1 1.6 1.4 1.9 2.0 1.5 1.4 1.9 1.9 1.6 2.0 2.50.6 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.8 1.1 1.9 3.1

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.6 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.8 2.0 4.20.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.8 1.2 1.4 1.5 1.4 1.2 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.0 0.6 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.8 1.8 2.70.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.8 1.6 3.1 3.9 4.1 3.5 3.0 2.1 2.5 3.4 3.4 3.0 2.4 3.1 3.4 3.5 2.6 2.5 3.4 3.4 3.3 2.5 3.0 3.8 3.7 2.4 1.1 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.7 1.0 2.0 3.6

0.2 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.4 1.2 1.9 1.6 2.2 4.30.9 0.7 0.4 0.4 4.0 2.2 2.4 3.4 2.9 2.62.7 1.7 0.7 0.5 4.7 2.7 2.5 3.6 1.6 1.15.2 2.6 1.0 0.7 4.9 2.7 2.6 4.44.6 2.7 1.1 0.7 4.2 2.5 2.4 2.84.7 2.5 1.0 0.7 3.6 2.2 2.3 3.42.6 2.0 1.0 0.7 2.4 2.0 2.3 3.93.3 2.2 1.1 0.7 3.2 2.1 2.1 2.55.5 2.9 1.2 0.7 4.3 2.4 2.3 3.35.0 2.9 1.3 0.8 4.2 2.4 2.4 3.94.4 2.6 1.2 0.9 3.5 2.2 2.1 2.52.9 2.2 1.1 0.9 2.6 2.1 2.2 3.3

4.5 2.6 1.2 1.0 3.9 2.3 2.4 4.04.9 2.9 1.2 1.0 4.1 2.4 2.3 2.85.5 2.9 1.2 1.0 4.6 2.4 2.4 3.83.5 2.3 1.1 0.9 3.1 2.1 2.2 3.43.0 2.1 1.0 0.8 2.8 1.8 1.5 1.54.7 2.2 0.9 0.8 3.6 1.5 0.9 0.72.4 1.4 0.7 0.6 1.8 1.0 0.5 0.4

0.1 0.1 0.1 0.5 1.5 3.6 3.0 1.8 1.0 0.6 0.6 0.8 1.1 1.4 2.2 4.9 5.7 6.2 5.0 4.5 2.5 3.4 5.4 5.0 4.3 2.9 4.5 4.9 5.5 3.4 3.1 5.6 5.0 5.1 3.1 4.2 5.7 5.8 3.4 1.5 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5

0.5 0.6 0.7 0.9 1.5 2.1 2.0 1.4 1.0 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.4 2.1 3.1 3.7 3.8 3.4 2.9 2.3 2.7 3.3 3.4 2.9 2.6 3.1 3.4 3.3 2.7 2.7 3.3 3.4 3.2 2.7 3.1 3.6 3.5 2.5 1.4 0.8 0.5 0.4 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.71.6 1.9 1.9 1.8 2.0 2.3 2.3 2.0 1.7 1.9 2.1 2.2 2.0 2.1 2.5 2.8 2.9 2.7 2.5 2.4 2.4 2.7 2.9 2.8 2.5 2.4 2.7 2.9 2.6 2.4 2.6 2.8 2.8 2.6 2.5 2.7 2.9 2.8 2.3 1.8 1.4 1.0 0.5 0.2 0.3 0.6 1.3 1.7 2.0 1.9 1.6 1.7 1.9 1.9 1.7 1.6 1.8 1.9 1.9 1.7 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.9 2.03.8 4.3 4.6 2.8 3.2 4.5 4.3 3.7 2.7 4.0 4.3 4.9 3.2 3.0 5.1 4.3 4.3 3.0 3.5 3.6 3.3 4.6 4.5 4.9 3.0 3.3 4.6 4.4 3.8 2.8 4.0 4.3 4.8 3.2 3.0 5.0 4.3 4.4 2.9 3.3 3.5 2.1 0.9 0.3 0.3 1.1 2.6 4.4 4.4 4.3 2.7 3.4 4.3 4.3 3.4

1.0 0.3 0.4 1.20.9 0.4 0.5 1.30.8 0.3 0.4 1.00.6 0.2 0.3 0.80.6 0.2 0.3 0.80.6 0.2 0.2 0.80.6 0.1 0.2 0.60.6 0.1 0.1 0.30.3 0.1 0.0 0.1

LA PALMA AVENUE

DALE STREET

CITY OF BUENA PARK
C
A
LL

BEFORE YOU
D
I
G
THE GRADING AND/OR IMPROVEMENT PLANSARE APPROVED FOR A PERIOD OF TWO (2)YEARS FROM THE DATE SIGNED BY THECITY ENGINEER. AFTER THE TWO (2) YEARPERIOD HAS LAPSED, THE ENGINEER OFRECORD MAY BE REQUIRED TO SUBMIT ANDPROCESS FOR CITY ENGINEER APPROVAL,UPDATED PLANS THAT COMPLY WITH THEMOST CURRENT CITY STANDARDS,PRACTICES, AND POLICIES.

OF INTENTION TO GRADE OR EXCAVATE.
227-2600
1-800

TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG
Underground Service Alert

SITE UNTIL BELOW AGENCY IS NOTIFIEDNO WORK SHALL BE DONE ON THIS CITY I. D. NO.

SHEET OF
ACCT. NO.

APPR DATE

REVISION

DESCRIPTION

DALE AND LA PALMA
REC.

PLANS PREPARED
NAME R.C.E. # EXP.

IMPORTANT NOTE:

MARK DATE INITIAL
E.O.R.

DATE

PHOTOMETRIC SITE PLAN
UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF:

BENCHMARK:

BASIS OF
BEARING:

OF RECORD'S
SEAL

ENGINEER
FOR: W.O
Call: TOLL FREE
1255 W. COLTON AVE. STE 619
REDLANDS, CA 92374
(760) 833-0401
[email protected]
PHOTOMETRIC LAYOUT 1

CALCULATION SURFACE PARAMETER AVERAGE
PARKING PERPENDICULAR ILLUMINANCE 1.83 FC

PHOTOMETRIC RESULTS

WALKWAYS/

OPEN SPACE

PERPENDICULAR
ILLUMINANCE 1.88 FC

IN-TRACT

PRIVATE STREETS

PERPENDICULAR
ILLUMINANCE 1.97 FC
PHOTOMETRIC RESULTS INCLUDES BUILDING LIGHTS ON FRONT AND REAR OF EACH UNIT, SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR MORE INFORMATION.

SOLAR POLE LIGHT 0 WATTS, 2,953 LUMENS, TYPE 3 DISTRIBUTION, N.T.S.

LEGEND
BACK TO BACK - SOLAR POLE LIGHT 0 WATTS, 2,953 LUMENS, TYPE 4 DISTRIBUTION, N.T.S.HOUSE COACH LIGHT - 18 WATTS, N.T.S. (LIGHTS SHOWN FOR PHOTOMETRIC PURPOSE ONLY) 1" = 30'
30' 15' 0' 30' 60'
SCALE:
1 CITY OF BUENA PARK, CALIFORNIA

PHOTOMETRIC SITE PLAN

DALE STREET AND LA PALMA AVENUE
℄ ℄ ℄ ℄ TT-24-1 RECEIVED JUL 14 2024 PLANNING DIV
0 1" = 30' 15 30 60 A
4'
4' A A A A A A A A A A A A A A 0 1" = 30' 15 30 60
4'
4' A A A A A A A A A A A A A A 0 1" = 30' 15 30 60
4'
4' A (Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN 65G 65G (Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN (Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN (Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN (Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN 65G 65G(Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN (Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN(Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN A A A A A A A A A A A A A FIRE LANE 0 1" = 30' 15 30 60

VICINITY MAP

CITY COUNCIL
November 12, 2024
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. GP-23-1, ZONE CHANGE NO. Z-23-1, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. TT-24-1, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. CU-24-1, MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. MND-24-2
8030 Dale Street
APN: 070-501-01
Subject Property
Project Location

COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
La Palma Avenue
Dale Street
Tamarack Way
North
City of Buena Park
City Council Regular Meeting Agenda Report
A. DISCUSS AND PROVIDE DIRECTION REGARDING THE EVALUATION OF ON-STREET PARKING ON ADAMS WAY,

JACKSON WAY, AND GRAND AVENUE FRONTAGE ROAD
Meeting
Tuesday, November 12, 2024, 5:00 PM
Agenda Group
STUDY SESSION Item: 9A.

Presented By
Deepthi Arabolu, P.E., T.E., Assistant City Engineer
Prepared By
Mina Mikhael, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
Approved By
Aaron France, City Manager

DISCUSSION
At the City Council Meeting on October 8, 2024, Mayor Sonne calendared an item to address the on-street parking situation on Adams Way, Jackson Way, and Grand Avenue frontage roads. In response to this request, staff conducted an investigation that included a thorough field review of the existing conditions.

EXISTING CONDITIONS
Adams Way, Jackson Way, and Grand Avenue frontage roads are all part of the Presidential Tract, located south of Crescent Avenue on the east side of Grand Avenue (refer to Attachment 1 for a location map).

Adams Way and Jackson Way are "u-shaped" residential streets that intersect with Grand Avenue frontage road.

Both streets share a similar design, with a 25 mph prima facie speed limit, a width of 28 feet, and parking permitted on both sides. Numerous residential driveways front both sides of these streets.

Grand Avenue frontage road is a north-south roadway situated on the east side of Grand Avenue, providing exclusive access from Grand Avenue to Adams Way, Jackson Way, and an alley located in the City of Anaheim at its southern end. The road is 28 feet wide, with parking permitted only on the east side. The west side features a noparking zone adjacent to a landscaped median that separates the frontage road from Grand Avenue.

All properties in this area are zoned RS-6, a single-family residential zone. However, just outside of this area are West Jackson Way and Fillmore Drive that are primarily zoned RM-20. RM-20 is a residential multi-family designation and the highest density allowed in the City. Haldor Place is also located on the west side of Grand Avenue, north of Fillmore Drive. This street is zoned RS-6A and several single-family residences front it.  This area also borders the City of Anaheim, where there is a mix of single and multi-family residential zones. The streets located in the City of Anaheim are characterized by Permit Parking Districts (PPD). Please refer to Attachment 2 for an overview of the zoning map. This study focuses on the area within the City of Buena Park’s jurisdiction, especially West Jackson Way, Fillmore Drive, and Grand Avenue. These areas experience very heavy parking demands during all times of the day. However, Haldor Place, while nearby, does not experience this high parking demand.

ANALYSIS
In an effort to analyze the parking situation on Adams Way, Jackson Way and Grand Avenue frontage road, staff made a series of observations in the area at different hours during AM and PM times.

Street
Name
Time Average #
Parked
Vehicles
Available #
of Spaces
%
Occupancy
am / pm
Adams
Way
AM /
PM
5 / 48 114 4% / 42%
Jackson
Way
AM /
PM
5 / 40 136 4% / 29%
Grand
Frontage
AM /
PM
4 / 24 22 18% / 109%
Date Range of Counts: 10/15 to 10/30
Staff's parking study and field review indicated the following:

The parking demand is highest during the evening and overnight hours, with very few vehicles parked on the streets at other times.

At the intersections of Adams Way and Jackson Way with Grand Avenue, many vehicles were parked very close to the corners, which wasn’t the case in the interior segment of the streets.

Majority of the residents in the area appeared to be using their driveways and garages.

Overall, most of the street segments' parking occupancy was under the 75% parking level (as required in the PPD policy). The typical range was 20% to 40% occupancy.

Parked vehicles were clustered as close as possible to Grand Avenue and the nearby apartments.

The parking demand on Grand Avenue frontage was typically at or above 100% occupancy because more vehicles were parked “bumper to bumper”, leaving no room between the vehicles and some vehicles appeared to be parked illegally (blocking fire hydrants, alongside red curb, around corners) rather than parked further into the neighborhood.

Parking demand decreases the further away one gets from Grand Avenue.

Majority of the drivers crossed Grand Avenue and went into the nearby multi-family residential complex located on West Jackson Way and Fillmore Drive.

Furthermore, as a part of this study, staff collected the collision history on these streets. The five-year collision history indicated no reported accidents on all three streets, indicating the roadways are operating well with an excellent safety record.

RECOMMENDATIONS
Based on the findings of the study, staff would like to present the following options for City Council consideration:

1. No Overnight Parking on Grand Avenue Frontage Road: This option would restrict parking on the east side of the Grand Avenue frontage road during peak demand hours from 9 pm to 6 am. This measure would help manage overflow parking and reduce the number of traffic violations (e.g. blocking fire hydrants, parking alongside red curb, and parking around corners) that occur due to being over parking capacity. This option, however, would also prevent residents from parking in front of their homes during these hours, which could negatively impact them. Staff recommends that, to implement this option, a petition be circulated, requiring a majority of residents with access to Grand Avenue frontage support the measure. The percentage required to constitute a majority will need to be determined by the City Council.

2. PPD on Adams Way, Jackson Way and Grand Avenue Frontage Road: This option would require residents to contact the City to express their interest in establishing a PPD. Subsequently, staff will require residents to circulate the PPD application to the community for neighborhood concurrence. Staff will then assess the application and site to determine if a PPD is warranted and justified in accordance to the City’s established policy. The PPD can be considered for the entire day or solely for overnight hours, depending on what the City Council and community prefers.

It should be noted that implementing either of these recommendations could negatively impact Haldor Place and further worsen the parking situation on West Jackson Way and Fillmore Drive.

Attachments
Attachment 1 - Vicinity Map.pdf
Attachment 2 - Zoning Map.pdf

BEACH BLVD

CRESCENT AVE STANTON AVE GRAND AVE

JACKSON WAY

JACKSON WAY

ADAMS WAY

ADAMS WAY

FILLMORE DR

JACKSON WAY

CITY OF BUENA PARK

CITY OF ANAHEIM

COOLIDGE AVE

MONROE AVE

TYLER AVE

AFFECTED AREA
7843 7849
7800 7830
7771 7777 7783 7789 7795 7801 7807 7813 7819
7776 7782
8591
7771
7770
7980
7731
7732
7731
8561
8571
7721
7722
7721
7721
7702
7824 7849
7855
7884 7861
7867
7885 7879 7873
7908 7902 7879
8682
7885
7921 7915 7909 7903 7891
7921 7915 7909 7903 7897 7891
7777 7783 7789 7795 7801 7807 7813 7819 7825
7776 7782 7788 7794 7800 7806 7812 7818 7824
7974 7968 7962 7956 7950 7944 7938
7770
7944
7945
7932
7957 7951 7945 7939 7933
7825 7831
7837
7981 7975 7969 7963 7927
7843
7926
7837
7861
7830 7836 7842 7867
7873
7920 7914
7897
7806 7812 7818
7938 7932 7926 7920 7914 7908 7902 7896 7890
7939 7933 7927
7831
7720
7788 7794 7800
7722 7732
7855

JACKSON WAY

ADAMS WAY

JACKSON WAY

ADAMS WAY GRAND AVE GRAND AVE FRONTAGE

BEACH BLVD
7843 7849
7771 7777 7783 7789 7795 7801 7807 7813 7819
7776 7782
7771
7770
7980
7824 7849
7855
7884 7861
7867
7885 7879 7873
7908 7902 7879
7885
7921 7915 7909 7903 7891
7921 7915 7909 7903 7897 7891
7777 7783 7789 7795 7801 7807 7813 7819 7825
7776 7782 7788 7794 7800 7806 7812 7818 7824
7974 7968 7962 7956 7950 7944 7938
7770
7944
7945
7932
7957 7951 7945 7939 7933
7825 7831
7837
7981 7975 7969 7963 7927
7843
7926
7837
7861
7830 7836 7842 7867
7873
7920
7897
7806 7812 7818
7938 7932 7926 7920 7914 7908 7902 7896 7890
7939 7933 7927
7831
7788 7794 7800
7855

JACKSON WAY

ADAMS WAY

JACKSON WAY

ADAMS WAY

GRAND AVE FRONTAGE

BEACH BLVD
LEGEND

RESIDENTIAL
(RS-6)

COMMERCIAL

GENERAL (CG)

MEDIUM DENSITY MULTIFAMILY
RESIDENTIAL (RM-20)

CITY OF BUENA PARK

CITY OF ANAHEIM
City of Buena Park
City Council Regular Meeting Agenda Report
B. DISCUSS THE CITY’S ROAD IMPROVEMENT STRATEGIES AND COSTS Meeting
Tuesday, November 12, 2024, 5:00 PM
Agenda Group
STUDY SESSION Item: 9B.

Presented By
Mina Mikhael, P.E., Director of Public Works/City Engineer Prepared By
Mina Mikhael, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
Approved By
Aaron France, City Manager

DISCUSSION
Street rehabilitation projects are an essential component of public infrastructure that significantly influence economic growth. While the effects of such projects may appear localized or limited to the transport sector, the benefits extend broadly across urban economies, impacting productivity, real estate values, local businesses, and long-term city growth. Well-maintained streets contribute to higher property values, as the area becomes more desirable for residents and businesses alike. This rise in property values creates wealth for property owners and encourages further investments in the area.

The City continues to implement a robust annual paving and slurry seal program to maintain and improve the Pavement Condition Index (PCI) rating across all city streets. The City utilizes three major funding sources for all transportation-related Capital Improvement Program (CIP) projects. These funding sources are RMRA (SB-1), Gas Tax, and Measure M2. Collectively, these sources provide us with funding to plan, budget, and construct projects.

Out of this funding, roughly $4 million is directly used on the construction portion of transportation-related projects.

This funding is spent on annual paving, annual slurry, arterial pavement rehabilitation, traffic signal improvements, and other right-of-way improvements - including curb ramps, sidewalks, and driveways. Historically, the City has done an excellent job in utilizing the funding currently received to address the necessary repaving of streets through best practices, new technologies, and proactive planning/budgeting.

The City utilizes a seven-year project planning method, as required by OCTA, to plan and budget projects over that same seven-year period. By utilizing our biennial Pavement Management Plan (PMP), staff is able to study current and projected street conditions to identify priority streets. By then utilizing cost estimates based on recent bid results and projected inflation costs, the seven-year pavement plan is organized and submitted to OCTA along with the PMP. Staff continues to monitor street conditions as they change frequently due to weather, traffic, and other conditions, while continuing to refine the plan, as needed. This method is utilized for the Arterial Rehabilitation Program, Annual Pavement Program and Annual Slurry Program. However, the cost for pavement rehabilitation continues to increase beyond the annual incremental increase in grant revenues.

Over the years, the discrepancy between funding sources and rising inflation rates has significantly impacted the ability to continue implementing the City’s PMP. The concern is that the current fair-share revenue will not be able to meet transportation project needs as most gas taxes are not adjusted based on yearly inflation. Although the cost of paving a roadway depends on size and location, major arterial rehab projects that have been completed over the past two years illustrate an increase in cost per mile when taking into account the cost increase in labor, equipment, and pavement materials. It is also worth noting that the rise of electric and hybrid vehicles could lead to funding shortfalls in the next few years as fewer gas station visits will translate to less revenue from gas taxes.

Moreover, vehicles are increasing in weight, particularly with the rise of electric vehicle sales, causing more wear and tear on asphalt pavement. Per the latest PMP completed in 2024, approximately 25% of the city streets are at a rating of fair or below. While this shows a healthy overall rating for the City, with the existing budget, the PMP is projecting a slow drop in overall PCI and an increase in streets rated at fair or below. Over the years, previous PMPs have outlined similar concerns and the need for more funding. However, staff has engineered around some of these financial struggles to keep on track with paving projects and maintain a healthy overall PCI rating.

The challenge, however, is getting tougher as of recent years and is experienced county-wide; some Orange County cities are supplementing the transportation funding with alternative funding sources to deliver a more significant impact to the improvement of their local infrastructure. The City, in coordination with other Orange County cities, is also discussing new technologies to allow cities to repave streets with lower costs resulting in delivering more improvements with less. It should be noted, these technologies have not necessarily experienced the test of time.

To effectively implement the City’s PMP and prevent further deterioration, increased funding is required. Per the latest 2024 PMP, a recommended budget of approximately $7 million would allow the City to repave streets at a pace that will maintain or increase the current overall PCI over the next seven years. This requires additional funding of approximately $3 million annually to supplement the grant and local fair-share funding utilized in the current CIP budget.

Investing in the City's street infrastructure is crucial for the safety, economy, and overall well-being of our community. With the necessary funding, staff can ensure that Buena Park streets are safe, efficient, and conducive to economic growth.

City of Buena Park
City Council Regular Meeting Agenda Report
C. DISCUSS AND PROVIDE DIRECTION REGARDING CITY SELECTION COMMITTEE VOTING Meeting
Tuesday, November 12, 2024, 5:00 PM
Agenda Group
STUDY SESSION Item: 9C.

Presented By
Jessica Fewer, Senior Management Analyst
Prepared By
Eddie Fenton, Assistant City Manager/Director of Human
Resources
Approved By
Aaron France, City Manager

DISCUSSION
The next Orange County City Selection Committee Meeting will be held on November 14, 2024 at the City of Orange Council Chamber. Below are the available committee appointments and applicants for District 4:

Orange County Human Relations Committee - One (1) 4th District Representative Individual must receive majority votes of District 4
Applicant: Fred Jung, Mayor Pro Tem, City of Fullerton
Orange County Older Adults Advisory Commission - One (1) 4th District Representative Individual must receive majority votes of District 4
No applications received
Airport Land Use Commission - One (1) At-Large Commissioner A Mayor/City Council Member
Must receive the majority of votes from the City Selection Committee No applications received
Orange County Housing Finance Trust - One (1) Orange County City Representative Mayor/Council Member (non-represented City in North, Central or South Service Planning Area with 60,000+ residents)
Must receive the majority of votes from those qualifying cities Applicant: Natalie Moser, Council Member, City of Huntington Beach (District 1) Orange County Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO)- One (1) Orange County City Representative Mayor/City Council Member
Must receive the majority of votes from the City Selection Committee Applicants: Mike Caroll, Council Member, Irvine; Tanya Doby, Council Member, City of Los Alamitos (support request letter attached); Peggy Huang, Council Member, City of Yorba Linda; Tammy Kim, Council Member, City of Irvine; Carol Moore, Council Member, Laguna Woods Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) Board of Directors - One (1) 4th District Representative (One City/One Vote)
Mayor/City Council Member
Appointed on one city/one vote  (obtain four votes comprising a majority of cities in 4th District) Applicant: Fred Jung, Mayor Pro Tem, City of Fullerton
Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) Board of Directors - One (1) 4th District Representative (Population Weighted)
Mayor/City Council Member
Appointed on population-weighted vote (obtain votes comprising a majority population weight from 4th District cities)
Applicant: Carlos A. Leon, Council Member, Anaheim
There are other open positions that are not associated with District 4 or the City Selection Committee at-large.

Staff is requesting the City Council determine a voting delegate and alternate delegate to vote at the City Selection Committee meeting. Traditionally, the Mayor is the voting member. Additionally, the City Council should provide direction to the voting delegate on the appointments listed in the staff report.

Attachments
11-14-24 Agenda.pdf
11-14-24, CSC statements received.pdf
OCHRC D4 - Jung_Redacted.pdf
OCHFT large city - Moser_Redacted.pdf
LAFCO - Huang_Redacted.pdf
LAFCO - Carroll_Redacted.pdf
LAFCO - Doby_Redacted.pdf
LAFCO - Kim_Redacted.pdf
LAFCO - Moore_Redacted.pdf
OCTA D4 1 city-1 vote - Jung_Redacted.pdf
OCTA D4 pop weight - Leon_Redacted.pdf
Request Support Doby - LAFCO - Nov 2024.pdf
1 Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
400 W. Civic Center Dr., 6th Floor
Santa Ana, CA 92701
(714) 834-2206 ** FAX (714) 834-4439
[email protected]
Robin Stieler
Clerk of the Board

CITY SELECTION COMMITTEE

REGULAR MEETING
AGENDA
Thursday, November 14, 2024
5:00 P.M.

City of Orange
Orange City Council Chamber
300 E. Chapman Avenue, Orange CA 92866
This agenda contains a brief description of each item to be considered by the Committee. Except as provided by law, no action shall be taken on any item not appearing on the agenda. To address the Committee on any item appearing on the agenda, please submit a speaker request form identifying the item to the Clerk. To speak on a matter not appearing on the agenda, but under the jurisdiction of the City Selection Committee, you may do so by submitting a speaker form requesting to speak during Public Comments at the end of the meeting. Supporting documentation is available for review in the office of the Clerk of the Board located in the County of Orange Hall of Administration, 400 W. Civic Center Dr., 6th Floor, Santa Ana, CA 92701, Monday – Friday, 8:00 a.m. – 5:00 p.m.
• CALL TO ORDER
• PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
• APPROVALOF May 9, 2024, REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
2 • APPOINTMENTS:
a. CITY ENGINEERS FLOOD CONTROL ADVISORY COMMITTEE
• (1) City Engineer or City Director of Public Works to serve as 1st District Member on the City Engineers Flood Control Advisory Committee. To secure this seat, the candidate must be a City Engineer or City Director of Public Works and a member of The City Engineers Association of Orange County (CEAOC). The candidate must obtain five votes comprising a majority of the cities within the First Supervisorial District. Those cities are Cypress, Fountain Valley, Garden Grove, Huntington Beach, La Palma, Los Alamitos, Seal Beach and Westminster. This three-year term begins upon appointment. This seat is currently held by Jake Ngo, Westminster Public Works Director/City Engineer. CEAOC nominates Iris Lee, City of Seal Beach Director of Public Works for a three-year term. • (1) City Engineer or City Director of Public Works to serve as 5th District Member on the City Engineers Flood Control Advisory Committee. To secure this seat, the candidate must be a City Engineer or City Director of Public Works and a member of The City Engineers Association of Orange County (CEAOC). The candidate must obtain six votes comprising a majority of the cities within the Fifth Supervisorial District. Those cities are Aliso Viejo, Costa Mesa, Dana Point, Laguna Beach, Laguna Hills, Laguna Niguel, Laguna Woods, Newport Beach, San Clemente and San Juan Capistrano. This three-year term begins upon appointment. This seat is currently held by Jacki Scott, Laguna Niguel Public Works Director. CEAOC nominates Jacki Scott, City of Laguna Niguel Director of Public Works for a three-year term.
b. ORANGE COUNTY HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION
• (1) Individual to serve as the 4th District Representative on the Commission. To secure this seat, the candidate must obtain four votes comprising a majority of the cities within the Fourth Supervisorial District. Those cities are Anaheim, Brea, Buena Park, Fullerton, La Habra, Placentia and Stanton. This appointment is for a two-year term that will begin date of appointment. This seat is currently vacant.
c. ORANGE COUNTY OLDER ADULTS ADVISORY COMMISSION
• (1) Individual to serve as 1st District Representative 1 on the Commission. To secure this seat, the candidate must obtain five votes comprising a majority of the cities within the First Supervisorial District. Those cities are Cypress, Fountain Valley, Garden Grove, Huntington Beach, La Palma, Los Alamitos, Seal Beach and Westminster. This appointment is for a two-year term that begins January 1, 2025 and expires December 31, 2026. This seat is currently held by Nathan Steel, Seal Beach City Council. 3 • (1) Individual to serve as 2nd District Representative 1 on the Commission. To secure this seat, the candidate must obtain two votes comprising a majority of the cities within the Second Supervisorial District. Those cities are Orange, Santa Ana and Tustin. This appointment is for a two-year term that begins January 1, 2025 and expires December 31, 2026. This seat is currently held by Ken Higman, Santa Ana. • (1) Individual to serve as 2nd District Representative 2 on the Commission. To secure this seat, the candidate must obtain two votes comprising a majority of the cities within the Second Supervisorial District. Those cities are Orange, Santa Ana and Tustin. This appointment is to complete a two-year term that began January 1, 2024 and expires December 31, 2025. This seat is currently held by Barbara Sloate, Newport Beach (her term expired 12/31/23).
• (1) Individual to serve as 3rd District Representative 1 on the Commission. To secure this seat, the candidate must obtain four votes comprising a majority of the cities within the Third Supervisorial District. Those cities are Irvine, Lake Forest, Mission Viejo, Rancho Santa Margarita, Villa Park and Yorba Linda. This appointment is for a two-year term that begins January 1, 2025 and expires December 31, 2026. This seat is currently held by Crystal Miles, Villa Park City Council.
• (1) Individual to serve as 3rd District Representative 2 on the Commission. To secure this seat, the candidate must obtain four votes comprising a majority of the cities within the Third Supervisorial District. Those cities are Irvine, Lake Forest, Mission Viejo, Rancho Santa Margarita, Villa Park and Yorba Linda. This appointment is to complete a two-year term that began January 1, 2024 and expires December 31, 2025. This seat is currently vacant. • (1) Individual to serve as 4th District Representative 1 on the Commission. To secure this seat, the candidate must obtain four votes comprising a majority of the cities within the Fourth Supervisorial District. Those cities are Anaheim, Brea, Buena Park, Fullerton, La Habra, Placentia and Stanton. This appointment is for a two-year term that begins January 1, 2025 and expires December 31, 2026. This seat is currently held by Art Brown, Buena Park City Council.
• (1) Individual to serve as 5th District Representative 2 on the Commission. To secure this seat, the candidate must obtain six votes comprising a majority of the cities within the Fifth Supervisorial District. Those cities are Aliso Viejo, Costa Mesa, Dana Point, Laguna Beach, Laguna Hills, Laguna Niguel, Laguna Woods, Newport Beach, San Clemente and San Juan Capistrano. This appointment is for a two-year term that begins January 1, 2025 and expires December 31, 2026. This seat is currently held by Dave Wheeler, Laguna Hills City Council.
4 d. ORANGE COUNTY WASTE MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
• (1) Mayor/Council Member to serve as the 3rd District Representative on the Commission. To secure this seat, the candidate must obtain four votes comprising a majority of the cities within the Third Supervisorial District. Those cities are Irvine, Lake Forest, Mission Viejo, Rancho Santa Margarita, Villa Park and Yorba Linda. This appointment is to complete a three-year term that began June 1, 2022 and expires May 31, 2025. This seat is currently vacant.
e. AIRPORT LAND USE COMMISSION
• (1) Mayor/Council Member to serve as the At Large Commissioner on the Commission.

To secure this seat, the candidate must obtain votes of the majority of the City Selection Committee. This appointment is for a term of four years that began May 4, 2021 and expires May 5, 2025. This seat is currently held by Schelly Sustarsic, Seal Beach City Council. The appointee will take office in December 2024, when Councilwoman Sustarsic leaves office after the election certification by the Seal Beach City Council. f. ORANGE COUNTY HOUSING FINANCE TRUST
• (1) Mayor/Council Member whose city is a current member of the Trust, is not currently on the Board of Directors representing the Central, North or South Service Planning Areas and whose city population is over 60,000, to serve pursuant to the Orange County Housing Finance Trust Joint Powers Agreement and its adopted bylaws. Voting cities are Trust member cities with a population over 60,000 and not already represented on the Trust Board. Those cities are: Costa Mesa, Garden Grove, Newport Beach, Tustin, Buena Park, Fullerton, Orange, Laguna Niguel, La Habra, Westminster, Huntington Beach, Mission Viejo, Lake Forest and Yorba Linda. This seat is for a two-year term beginning date of appointment. This seat is currently held by Natalie Moser, Huntington Beach City Council.
g. ORANGE COUNTY LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION (LAFCO) • (1) Mayor/Council Member to serve as the Orange County City Representative on the Commission. To secure this seat, the candidate must obtain votes by the majority of the City Selection Committee. This appointment is to complete a four-year term that began July 1, 2022 and expires June 30, 2026. This seat is currently held by Bruce Whitaker, Fullerton City Council. The appointee will take office in December 2024, when Councilman Whitaker leaves office after the election certification by the Fullerton City Council. 5 h. ORANGE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY BOARD OF DIRECTORS • (1) Mayor/Council Member to serve as the 1st Supervisorial District Board Member on the Orange County Transportation Authority’s Board of Directors, to be appointed on a population weighted vote basis. The candidate must obtain votes comprising a majority of the population weight from the cities within the First Supervisorial District. Those cities are Cypress, Fountain Valley, Garden Grove, Huntington Beach, La Palma, Los Alamitos, Seal Beach and Westminster. This appointment is for a two-year term that will begin January 1, 2025 and expire December 31, 2026. This seat is currently held by Patrick Harper, Fountain Valley City Council.
• (1) Mayor/Council Member to serve as the 2nd Supervisorial District Board Member on the Orange County Transportation Authority’s Board of Directors, to be appointed on a One City/One Vote basis. The candidate must obtain two votes comprising a majority of the cities within the Second Supervisorial District. Those cities are Orange, Santa Ana and Tustin. This appointment is for a two-year term that will begin January 1, 2025 and expire December 31, 2026. This seat is currently held by John Dumitru, Orange City Council. • (1) Mayor/Council Member to serve as the 3rd Supervisorial District Board Member on the Orange County Transportation Authority’s Board of Directors, to be appointed on a population weighted vote basis. To secure this seat, the candidate must obtain votes comprising a majority of the population weight from the cities within the Third Supervisorial District. Those cities are Irvine, Lake Forest, Mission Viejo, Rancho Santa Margarita, Villa Park and Yorba Linda. This appointment is for a two-year term that will begin January 1, 2025 and expire December 31, 2026. This seat is currently held by Farrah Khan, Irvine City Council.
• (1) Mayor/Council Member to serve as the 4th Supervisorial District Board Member on the Orange County Transportation Authority’s Board of Directors, to be appointed on a One City/One Vote basis. To secure this seat, the candidate must obtain four votes comprising a majority of the cities within the Fourth Supervisorial District. Those cities are Anaheim, Brea, Buena Park, Fullerton, La Habra, Placentia and Stanton. This appointment is for a twoyear term that will begin January 1, 2025 and expire December 31, 2026. This seat is currently held by Fred Jung, Fullerton City Council.
• (1) Mayor/Council Member to serve as the 4th Supervisorial District Board Member on the Orange County Transportation Authority’s Board of Directors, to be appointed on a population weighted vote basis. To secure this seat, the candidate must obtain votes comprising a majority of the population weight from the cities within the Fourth Supervisorial District. Those cities are Anaheim, Brea, Buena Park, Fullerton, La Habra, Placentia and Stanton. This appointment is to complete a two-year term that began January 1, 2024 and expires December 31, 2025. This seat is currently vacant. • (1) Mayor/Council Member to serve as the 5th Supervisorial District Board Member on the Orange County Transportation Authority’s Board of Directors, to be appointed on a One City/One Vote basis. To secure this seat, the candidate must obtain six votes comprising a majority of the cities within the Fifth Supervisorial District. Those cities are Aliso Viejo, 6 Costa Mesa, Dana Point, Laguna Beach, Laguna Hills, Laguna Niguel, Laguna Woods, Newport Beach, San Clemente and San Juan Capistrano. This appointment is for a two-year term that will begin January 1, 2025 and expire December 31, 2026. This seat is currently held by Jamey Federico, Dana Point City Council.
• OTHER MATTERS FROMCOMMITTEE MEMBERS
• PUBLICCOMMENTS
• ADJOURNMENT
11/14/24, City Selection Committee Applications Received:

City Engineers Flood Control Advisory Committee, 1st & 5th Districts:
• Iris Lee, Seal Beach
• Jacki Scott, Laguna Niguel
Orange County Human Relations Commission, 4th District:
• Fred Jung, Fullerton
Orange County Older Adults Advisory Commission:
• Nathan Steele, Seal Beach, 1st District, Rep 1
• Ken Higman, Santa Ana, 2nd District, Rep 1
• Crystal Miles, Villa Park, 3rd District, Rep 1
• Dave Wheeler, Laguna Hills, 5th District, Rep 2
Orange County Waste Management Commission, 3rd District:
• None
Airport Land Use Commission:
• None
Orange County Housing Finance Trust, Large City:
• Natalie Moser, Huntington Beach
LAFCO:
• Mike Carroll, Irvine
• Tanya Doby, Los Alamitos
• Peggy Huang, Yorba Linda
• Tammy Kim, Irvine
• Carol Moore, Laguna Woods
OCTA:
• Ted Bui, Fountain Valley, 1st District
• Patrick Harper, Fountain Valley, 1st District
• Amy Phan West, Westminster, 1st District
• Jon Dumitru, Orange, 2nd District
• Mike Carroll, Irvine, 3rd District
• Fred Jung, Fullerton, 4th District, 1 city-1 vote
• Carlos Leon, Anaheim, 4th District, population weight • Victor Cabral, San Clemente, 5th District
• Jamey Federico, Dana Point, 5th District

As an Asian American in Orange County, I have an unique perspective I can bring to represent a community that is only growing in size and scope.

I hope my non-partisan approach helps the Commission’s productivity and outreach into said community.

And lastly, I hope I continue to earn the trust and faith of the Mayors and elected officials in our County by bringing professionalism and pragmatism to the role.

Candidate Statement - Orange County Housing Finance Trust Board of Directors Candidate - Natalie Moser, City Council Member, Huntington Beach 1) What would you hope to accomplish in your term as a member of this committee? I hope to continue to assist the OCHFT in fulfilling its mission of funding housing; specifically assisting the homeless population and persons and families of extremely low, very low, and low income within the County of Orange.

I will continue to work with the Board to ensure that Orange County municipalities that are seeking to fill gaps in funding will be competitive and have access to additional funding sources to address the homelessness and affordability crisis.

I also hope to work together with the Board to move the OCHFT forward in its quest to find new funding opportunities outside of State and Federal grant funding to further the Trust's mission.
2) The Opportunity Notice lists the Objective and/or Responsibilities of this position; what qualifications or skills do you bring to the position you are seeking appointment? Objective: Funding housing assisting the homeless population and persons and families of extremely low, very low, and low income within the County of Orange.

Responsibilities: Bring a collaborative strength for the advocacy of maximum funding toward projects in the County of Orange for the stated Purpose. Review project funding requests related to the stated Purpose.
—————
Education: Bachelors Degree from CSULB, MBA from Chapman University Prior to being elected to Huntington Beach’s City Council, I worked in the financial services industry and later actively worked on advocating and organizing for increased homeless services, shelter, and affordable housing in Huntington Beach. Together with others, I advocated at City Hall (behind the scenes with staff and management) and with City Council members, including giving public comments to encourage Huntington Beach to join the OC Housing Finance Trust. We understood then, that short and long term success would be inhibited by gaps in funding.

Now, as a Council Member, my primary focus has continued to be homelessness, with our overarching goal being to reduce homelessness and make it rare and brief when experienced.

We have worked hard on creating a local System of Care including 1- our Navigation Center (opened in December of 2020), 2- the first mobile crisis response team in Orange County through Be Well OC in HB (started in August of 2021) 3- creating a position and hiring Jason Austin as the Director of Homelessness and Behavioral Health, 4- continuing to expand and improve our Homeless Task Force, 5- successfully collaborating with the County on a Project Homekey site— HB Oasis (opened in October 2022 and operated by American Family Housing), 6- developing a community volunteer program (HB Cares) (October 2022), 7- elevating the City’s role as connector and support hub for local faith based and non-profit service providers (HB Homeless Collaborative), 8- supported and broke ground on Jamboree Senior Housing — a four-story affordable senior housing multi-family residence 9 - and partnering with Jamboree on the HB Pathways Project— a mixed-use development consisting of a permanent homeless shelter/navigation center with support services combined with permanent supportive housing.

My recent work with our multidisciplinary team on the Pathways Project (formerly the Healing Center) has further expanded my understanding of the challenges of identifying and compiling funding streams for all parts of the project— from seeking capital stacks of funding via a multitude of sources, partnering with CalOptima on funding services through CalAIM, and more.

I also had the fortune of participating in the District 2 Homelessness & Housing Advisory Group along with other advocates, service providers, elected officials, and homelessness and housing non-profit leaders.

I believe that my education and work experience, my commitment to addressing and resolving homelessness and affordable housing issues, my ability to work well independently and collaboratively prepared me to be a high value contributor on the OC Housing and Finance Trust Board, as has been demonstrated during my first term on the Trust over these past two years.

Orange County City Selection Committee
Candidate Statement Form
Name:

Specific Position
Applying For:

District:

Home address:

Mobile phone: E-mail:

City:

Years as elected official: Occupation:

Please list other positions held (both state and local service):

Please use a separate sheet to answer the following questions. 1) What would you hope to accomplish in your term as a member of this committee? 2) The Opportunity Notice lists the Objective and/or Responsibilities of this position; what qualifications or skills do you bring to the position you are seeking appointment? Signature Date
Peggy Z. Huang
Candidate Statement
LAFCO Orange County City Representative

1. What would you hope to accomplish in your year as a member of this committee? I previously served as LAFCO Orange County City Alternate Representative in 2021 and Member in 2022. I participated in updating OC LAFCO’s strategic plan, stressing the need to develop a template that identifies each type of municipal services review (MSR), and determining whether a MSR can be streamlined.

Both future governance in unincorporated Orange County and open space are complex issues that require thoughtful review and analysis on technical issues. I attended the informational meeting with communities interested in incorporation and listened to the concerns of the residents.

Further, LAFCO has a limited budget and small staff, but undertake large projects. I intend to work with the Executive Director and Commissioners on efficiency to ensure that LAFCO stays solvent to meet its objectives.

2. What qualification or skills do you bring to the position you are seeking? I previously held the LAFCO City Member position in 2022 and have a thorough understanding of the Commission’s work. My vast experience in regional issues serving as a Regional Council member at SCAG, Chair of the Community, Economic, and Human Development Committee, Chair of the RHNA subcommittee, and Vice Chair of Legislative Committee have given me a broad prospective and comprehensive understanding of issues affecting Orange County and Southern California. I previously served in the California State Senate and gained extensive public policy experience on water and environmental issues. I believe my skillset as an attorney will bring consensus and find common sense solutions to complex and technical issues.

Additionally, I am a nine-year City Council Member, served on the Orange County Commission on Children and Family (First Five), and served over a decade as the President of the Board for Lifesteps Children and Family Services, which is a statewide nonprofit that provide services to developmentally disabled children in disadvantage communities. Further, in my capacity at SCAG, I presided discussions over contentious issues such as transportation and housing, and developed skill-sets needed in common sense problem solving and consensus building.

Through these roles, I have gained expertise and experience on governance, budget, and thorough review on technical studies.

Mike Carroll
Orange County Local Agency Formation Commission
Candidate Statement Form
What would you hope to accomplish in your term as a member of this committee? Orange County has 34 incredible cities that provide invaluable services to over 3.1 million residents. In joining the Orange County Local Agency Commission, I hope to support its mission of ensuring that public services are delivered efficiently across Orange County. LAFCO is a great resource for local governments and I am eager to facilitate research that will create organized and efficient services for our communities.

By listening to residents, we can identify existing programs that need to deliver better outcomes.

As a Councilmember, I understand the needs of our residents and that municipalities always have room for improvement. Serving on LAFCO, I hope to enhance our government structures so that they are aligned with the needs of our communities.

The Opportunity Notice lists the Objective and/or Responsibilities of this position; what qualifications or skills do you bring to the position you are seeking appointment? Working with diverse stakeholders, I’ve built consensus on important projects that address community needs. I’m committed to supporting LAFCO’s mission to advance cooperative solutions by conducting special studies to organize Orange County’s growing structures. The fiscal health of our agencies is essential to ensuring programs are responsibly managed on behalf of the taxpayer. I aim to continue LAFCO’s commitment to developing sustainable solutions that serve residents effectively.

Thank you for the important work you do to support Orange County’s growth and service delivery. It would be a privilege to contribute to LAFCO’s mission and continue building upon the foundation of trust and governance you have established.

I have been faithfully representing District 4 residents on the Orange County Transportation Authority for the past 2 years. In that time, we have been able to continue meaningful projects that highlight our County’s dedication to regional multi-modal and public transportation.

There are upcoming projects that require oversight: from the completion of the Orange County Streetcar, to the expansion of the 55 freeway, and the future expansion of the 91 freeway, as well as all the many local projects Orange County Transportation Authority helps fund and support.

I currently serve as the Board of Director’s Chairman of the Transit Committee and am on the Executive Committee.

I humbly ask for your continued faith in my leadership capacity to continue to represent your values and your cities on OCTA.

Thank you.

Fred Jung
Orange County City Selection Committee
Candidate Statement Form
Name:

Specific Position
Applying For:

District:

Home address:

Mobile phone: E-mail:

City:

Years as elected official: Occupation:

Please list other positions held (both state and local service):

Please use a separate sheet to answer the following questions. 1) What would you hope to accomplish in your WHUP as a member of this committee? 2) The 2SSRUWXQLW\1RWLFH lists the 2EMHFWLYHDQGRU5HVSRQVLELOLWLHV of this position what
qualificationV or skills do you bring to the position you are seeking DSSRLQWPHQW? Signature Date
Orange County City Selection Committee
Candidate Statement Form
(Page 2)
Name: Carlos A. Leon
Position Applying for: 4th Supervisorial District Board Member - Population Weighted Seat
1) What would you hope to accomplish in your term as a member of this committee?
As the council member representing Anaheim’s District 2, I represent a large constituency that relies on public transportation in their daily lives. It’s imperative for our community that we look for innovative ways to create new routes and optimize existing ones to ensure that we’re meeting the needs of both visitors and residents- especially those without personal vehicles that rely on public transportation to access critical services like healthcare, education, and employment. In addition to exploring new programs and affordable transportation options, I would hope to work with board members and staff to better understand, address and improve:
- Accessibility and equity in our public transportation system - Rider safety and security
- Community engagement and awareness
- Student and senior transportation options
- Sustainability and alternative methods of transportation 2) The Opportunity Notice lists the Objective and/or Responsibilities of this position; what qualifications or skills do you bring to the position you are seeking appointment?
I have a proven track record of working together with colleagues, staff, residents, and community leaders to address both urgent problems in the short term while also strategically planning for the future, setting high but realistic expectations for long term improvements. I also have experience sitting on regional boards including the Orange County Mosquito and Vector Control District and the Southern California Association of Governments, where I collaborate with fellow elected officials and board members from across the the county and region, sharing ideas on how we can improve services and work towards bettering our residents’ quality of life.

October 8, 2024
Orange County Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
400 W. Civic Center Dr., 6th Floor
Santa Ana, CA 92701
RE: Application for the OCTA 4th Supervisorial District Board Member - Population Weighted Seat To Whom it May Concern:

I write to express my interest in being considered as a candidate for the open Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) 4th Supervisorial District Board Member - Population Weighted Seat.

With my experience as a council member representing Anaheim’s District 2, I have developed a deep understanding of the important role that public transportation has in the lives of my constituents. It is vital for essential access to healthcare, education, and employment opportunities. For those without personal vehicles, the availability and reliability of transit options directly affect their ability to engage fully in community life. It is imperative that we address these needs through innovative service models and community-focused solutions.

I am committed to ensuring that our transportation system serves all members of the community and that we are focusing on optimizing existing routes while exploring new services options that benefit our residents. I would hope to work with fellow board members and OCTA staff to take a collaborative approach and focus on:
• Accessibility and equity in our public transportation system • Rider safety and security
• Community engagement and awareness
• Student and senior transportation options
• Sustainability and alternative methods of transportation Thank you for your consideration. Please let me know if there are any questions or if there is any additional information that I can provide in the meantime.

Sincerely,
Carlos A. Leon
Councilmember, District 2
City of Anaheim
Sincerely,
October 31, 2024
SUBJECT: CITY SELECTION COMMITTEE – November 11, 2024
Dear Orange County Mayors and Council Members,
I am writing to request your support for appointment to the Orange County Local Agency Formation Commission at the November 11, 2024, City Selection Committee meeting.

As I end my fourth year on the City Council, I am confident I would be a valuable asset to this committee. My most pronounced qualification is my earnest desire to ensure equitable treatment for smaller cities. I have learned over my tenure as a Council Member that it is not always that stakeholders are overlooking a group, it is more often that the perspective of the underrepresented group is so far removed from the main stakeholders’ initial position. They often just need someone to draw their attention to points and considerations that may have been initially overlooked. I purpose to offer that overlooked perspective for my city and our county. My experience in collaboration and fostering understanding across stakeholders from various backgrounds and differing perspectives makes me an ideal and valuable candidate for this position. I’d be honored to be our voice to LAFCO.

I look forward to receiving your support.

Sincerely,

CITY OF LOS ALAMITOS
Tanya Doby
Council Member – District 1
City of Buena Park
City Council Regular Meeting Agenda Report
D. DISCUSS AND PROVIDE DIRECTION REGARDING A MEARSURE R EXPENDITURE REVIEW COMMITTEE Meeting
Tuesday, November 12, 2024, 5:00 PM
Agenda Group
STUDY SESSION Item: 9D.

Presented By
Eddie Fenton, Assistant City Manager
Prepared By
Eddie Fenton, Assistant City Manager/Director of Human
Resources
Approved By
Aaron France, City Manager

DISCUSSION
After receiving input from over 2,000 Buena Park residents about City needs and priorities, on July 23, 2024, the City Council placed Measure R - the Buena Park Public Safety and Essential Services Measure - on the November 5 General Election for voter consideration. During that same meeting, Council Member Brown requested a future discussion on a Sales Tax Revenue Oversight Committee should the voters approve the measure.

Buena Park voters had the opportunity to vote on the City of Buena Park Public Safety and Essential Services Measure, or Measure R, which proposed a one-cent (1¢) local transactions and use tax (local sales tax). By all accounts, it appears that Measure R will pass given the current voter returns, but there are still votes to be tallied.

Similar to all other revenues, Measure R expenditures will be subject to an independent annual audit, with a report presented to the City Council during public meetings.

On July 23, 2024, Council Member Brown requested a discussion on creating a committee comprised of residents, appointed by the City Council, to provide periodic or annual reviews and reports on expenditures from revenues derived from Measure R.

Other agencies have established and utilize review committees to ensure expenditures are in accordance with the ballot language approved by the voters. These committees are appointed by the governing body and typically review expenditures at the close of the budget cycle. As indicated above, these committees will sometimes provide a short summary or report of their review.

Alternatively, the City Council may also wish to bring back an expenditure policy for these revenues. Other agencies have created policies for additional tax revenues that dictate the amount that can be dedicated to labor costs, capital improvement projects, unfunded liability, etc. There are several existing policies from local cities that may be of interest to the Council.

Finally, the City Council may wish to simply solicit additional feedback from the community prior to expending these funds. The recent survey provided a healthy snapshot of the priorities identified by the community. However, there may be a desire from the City Council to host additional workshops or meetings to gather more input. The City Council could also appoint a sub-committee of two Council Members to lead this effort.