Campbell City Council
November 15, 2022

Chapter 18.16 ELECTRICAL CODE

18.16.010 Adoption of National Electrical Code.

The city council adopts the National Electrical Code for the regulation of electrical installations, facilities and appliances, the issuance of permits therefore, and enforcement thereof, which electrical code is as follows:

All of the provisions of the National Fire Protection Association's National Electrical Code of 2017 2021 edition, as amended in 2019 2022 by the State of California in the State Building Standard Regulations (Title 24), hereinafter termed the "California Electrical Code" and each and all of the regulations, provisions, penalties, conditions and terms, including the modifications, exceptions and additions hereinafter set forth (one copy of which code has been filed for use and examination by the public in the office of the city clerk) are referred to and are adopted and made a part hereof, the same as if fully set forth in this chapt er, and are adopted as sections of the chapter (bearing the same numerical sections, designations and titles as appear in the National Electrical Code), except insofar as the terms and provisions of the code are modified, altered, amplified and extended by the provisions of this chapter.
(Ord. No. 2175, § 3(Att. 6), 2-18-2014; Ord. No. 2215, § 3(Att. 5), 12-6-2016; Ord. No. 2255 , § 3(Att. 4), 12-3-2019) Chapter 18.18 CALIFORNIA ENERGY CODE

18.18.010 Adoption of California Energy Code.

The city council adopts the 2019 2022 California Energy Code for the design of buildings and the issuance of permits therefore, and enforcement thereof.
( Ord. No. 2255 , § 3(Att. 4), 12-3-2019)
Chapter 18.20 PROPERTY MAINTENANCE CODE

18.20.010 Adoption of International Property Maintenance Code.

The city council adopts a property maintenance Code for the regulation of various types of housing accommodations, and providing for the administration and enforcement thereof, which Internatio nal Property Maintenance Code is as follows:

All of the provisions of the International Code Conference's International Property Maintenance Code of 2018 2022, hereafter called "housing code," and each and all of the regulation's provisions, penalties, co nditions and terms thereof (one copy of which has been filed for use and examination by the public in the office of the building official), are referred to and are adopted and made a part thereof, the same as if fully set forth in this chapter, and are adopted as sections of this chapter, bearing the same numerical sections designations and titles as appear in the International Property Maintenance Code except as excepted, modified or amended in this chapter.

3.a
Packet Pg. 139
Attachment: CC Ordinance ~ Reach Codes (Second Reading of Ordinance 2290)

Created: 2022-07-12 11:15:39 [EST]
()

(Ord. No. 2175, § 3(Att. 6), 2-18-2014; Ord. No. 2215, § 3(Att. 5), 12-6-2016; Ord. No. 2255 , § 3(Att. 4), 12-3-2019)

18.20.020 Modifications.

Section 303 Swimming Pools, Spas and Hot Tubs, Subsection 303.2 Enclosures. Is amended to read: "Private swimming pools, hot tubs and spas, containing water more than 24 inches (610 mm) in depth shall be completely surrounded by a fence or barrier at least 60 inches (1524 mm) in height above the finished ground level measured on the side of the barrier away from the pool."
(Ord. No. 2175, § 3(Att. 6), 2-18-2014)

18.20.030 Utility meters.

No parcel or lot located in an R-1 zoning district shall have more than one utility meter for each utility servicing the parcel or lot.

Exception: When necessary for installation of residential photo-voltaic battery storage systems, an additional utility electrical meter is allowed. This meter shall be used only in conjunction with a photo -voltaic system and shall not be used for providing power to an accessory dwelling unit (Ord. No. 2175, § 3(Att. 6), 2-18-2014; Ord. No. 2183, § 1(Att.), 10-21-2014; Ord. No. 2215, § 3(Att. 5), 12-6-2016; Ord. No. 2216, § 7, 12-12-2016; Ord. No. 2255 , § 3(Att. 4), 12-3-2019) Note(s)—For statutory provisions relating to the "State Housing Law," defining the scope of such law and stating type of housing to which it applies, see West's Cal. Health and Safety Code § 17910 et seq. and § 17950. For the provisions describing the nature and duties of the local appeals board under the Housing Law, see Health and Safety Code § 17920.5. For the statutory provision adopting the International Property Maintenance Code (2018 Ed.), the International Building Code (2018 Ed.), the Uniform Plumbing Code (2018 Ed.), the Uniform Mechanical Code (2018 Ed.) and the National Electrical Code (2017) as part of the State Housing Law, see Health and Safety Code § 17922. (Back)

Chapter 18.21 STATE HISTORICAL CODE

18.21.010 Adoption of the State Historical Code.

The city council adopts the 2019 2022 California Historical Building Code, Title 24, Part 8, California Code of Regulations, for the regulation of rehabilitation, preservation, restoration (including related recons truction), or relocating of buildings or structures designated as historic buildings. Such alternative building standards and building regulations are intended to facilitate the restoration or change of occupancy so as to preserve their original or restored architectural elements and features. All of the provisions of the State of California State Historical Building Code hereinafter termed Historical Code, and each and all of the regulations, provisions, penalties, conditions and additions hereinafter set forth (one copy of which has been filed for use and examination by the public in the office of the building official) are referred to and are adopted and made a part hereof, the same as if fully set forth in this chapter, and are adopted as sections of the chapter (bearing the same numerical sections, designations and titles as appear in the State Historical Building Code), except insofar as the terms and provisions of the code are modified, altered, amplified and extended by the provisions of this chapter. (Ord. No. 2175, § 3(Att. 6), 2-18-2014; Ord. No. 2255 , § 3(Att. 4), 12-3-2019)

3.a
Packet Pg. 140
Attachment: CC Ordinance ~ Reach Codes (Second Reading of Ordinance 2290) Title 18 - BUILDING CODES AND REGULATIONS
Chapter 18.24 SWIMMING POOLS

Campbell, California, Code of Ordinances Created: 2022-07-12 11:15:40 [EST] ()

Chapter 18.24 SWIMMING POOLS

18.24.010 Definitions.
(a) "Private swimming pool" includes all artificially constructed pools which are used in connection with and appurtenant to a single-family residence and available only to the family of the householder or his private guests.
(b) "Public pool" includes all artificially constructed pools which are available to the general public either free or by paying a fee.
(c) "Semipublic pool" includes all artificially constructed pools which are used in connection with multiple family or cooperative groups (such as apartments, hotels, motels, private clubs, subdivisions, etc.) and available only to such groups and their private guests but not available to the general public. (d) "Swimming pool" means an artificial pool of water including all appurtenances to its use and used for swimming or recreational bathing.
(1) "Permanently installed spa, swimming or wading pool" means one that is constructed in the ground, on the ground, or in a building in such a manner that the pool cannot be readily disassembled for storage. (2) "Storable swimming or wading pool" means one that is so constructed that it may be readily disassembled for storage and reassembled to its original integrity. (e) "Wading pool" means either a storable or permanent water container for recreational wading purposes which at its deepest point is not over sixteen inches.
(Ord. No. 2175, § 3(Att. 6), 2-18-2014)

18.24.020 Building permit.

The city council adopts the 2021 International Swimming Pool and Spa Code, for the construction and maintenance (including related construction) of swimming pools and spas (one copy of which has been filed for use and examination by the public in the office of the building official), are referred to, and are adopted and made a part hereof, the same as if fully set forth in this chapter, and are adopted as sections of the chapter (bearing the same numerical sections, designations and titles as appear in the ISPSC), except insofar as the terms and provisions of the code are modified, altered, amplified and extended by the provisions of this chapter. (a) Application for permits for public and/or semipublic pools shall be accompanied by a certificate of acceptance by the county department of health, plans, calculations and specifications, in duplicate, and shall be in sufficient detail to show the following:
(1) Plot plan, including all easements and overhead utilities adjacent to pool area or over the property ; (2) Pool dimensions, depths, and volume in gallons;
(3) Type and size of filter system, filtration and backwash capacities; (4) Pool piping layout with all pipe sizes shown and type of material; (5) Pool pump capacity;
(6) Waste disposal system;

3.a
Packet Pg. 141
Attachment: CC Ordinance ~ Reach Codes (Second Reading of Ordinance 2290)

Created: 2022-07-12 11:15:40 [EST]
()

(7) Other pertinent data as may be required by the building official. (Ord. No. 2175, § 3(Att. 6), 2-18-2014)

18.24.030 General construction requirements for permanently installed pools. (a) Water Treating Devices. Where devices for chemically treating the water to be used in the pool are installed, they shall meet the requirements of the county department of envi ronmental health. (b) Filter and Re-circulation System. All pools shall be equipped with an efficient and dependable circulation and purification system, consisting of circulation pumps and piping arranged for optimum circulation in the pool, and a filter with the usual and necessary appurtenances as approved by the building official. Such system shall be operated at all times when the pool is in use. There shall be provided a complete turnover of the pool water in twenty-four hours or less for private pools, and eight hours or less for semipublic or public pools.
(c) Underwater Lighting. Each public and semipublic pool shall have installed at least one underwater lighting fixture.
(d) Steps and Stairways. Steps and stairways for entering and leaving the pool shall be of such construction as to minimize danger. Convex, semicircular or triangular steps shall have rounded corners. Public and semipublic pools shall meet all disability requirements of California State Title 24.

There shall be at least one stairway or ladder for exiting or entering the pool, located in the shallow end.

There may be at least one ladder or shelf for entering or exiting the pool at the deep end. Treads of ladders and/or steps shall be of non-slip construction.
(e) Runways or Decks. Runways, at least thirty inches wide for private pools and four feet wide for public pools, shall be placed adjacent to the pool. Runways shall be sloped one-fourth inch to the foot away from the pool, and should be of a material approved by the building official, which shall be of non-slip texture and easily cleaned. Grading around the pool area shall be such that the surface runoff shall be diverted from the pool. (f) Scum Gutters and Skimmers. Scum gutters and skimmers shall conform to the requiremen ts of the state Department of Health. Inlets for fresh or re-purified water shall be located to produce a reasonably uniform circulation of water throughout the entire pool without the existence of "dead" spots. (g) Clearances. No private pool shall have its water line closer than five feet from any property or building line, except pools may be no closer than thirty inches to the building if satisfactory evidence is submitted to show that no damage to the building will occur or any other hazardous or unsa fe condition will be created. No semipublic or public pool shall have its water line closer than five feet from any property line or four feet from any building line. All related pool equipment shall be located in the rear yard and shall be located no closer than five feet from any property line, except when enclosed by a sound barrier, for which drawings have been approved by the building department, in which case the setback may be six inches. Overhead electrical power lines and service conductors shall maintain clearance between wire and water surface compliant to Article 680 California Electrical code.
(h) Walls and Floors. The walls and floors shall be of an approved, engineered design and constructed to be structurally sound under the conditions of the site. The pool walls and floor shall be constructed of smooth, nonabsorbent materials, free from cracks, light in color and so constructed as to be properly drained through one or more metal-grated openings. A tight, leak-proof pool with easily cleaned surfaces shall be provided.

The inner surface of the pool must be coved, rounded or bull- nosed at all joints, corners, angles of bases, walls, floors or curbs. No sharp corners or projections will be permitted. Floor drains shall be flush with the finished surface. The materials used in wall and floor construction shall conform to the provisions of the building code of the city.

3.a
Packet Pg. 142
Attachment: CC Ordinance ~ Reach Codes (Second Reading of Ordinance 2290) Title 18 – Building Codes and Regulations

(Ord. No. 2175, § 3(Att. 6), 2-18-2014)

18.24.040 General construction requirements for storable pools.

Subsections (a), (b), (c), (d), (e), (f) and (g) of Section 18.24.030 shall apply to the construction of storable pools. Storable pools shall be installed as per manufacturer's instructions. (Ord. No. 2175, § 3(Att. 6), 2-18-2014)

18.24.050 Indoor swimming pools.

In addition to the remainder of the requirements in this chapter, indoor swimming pools shall have windows or a skylight equal to at least one-half of the surface area of the pool; provided, that artificial light may be used in lieu thereof if approved by the building official.
(Ord. No. 2175, § 3(Att. 6), 2-18-2014)

18.24.060 Inspection.

All portions of the construction of the pool shall be inspected by the building official or his representative to insure compliance with the required codes of the city. A final inspection to allow occupancy cannot be made until the pool is completed, filled with water and the filter system is in operation and that all phases function correctly. (Ord. No. 2175, § 3(Att. 6), 2-18-2014)
Note(s)—Prior history: Ords. 1470, 1407 and prior code §§ 8105.3, 8105. 6 and 8105.7 (Back) Chapter 18.26 GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE

18.26.010 Adoption of the State Green Building Code.

The city council adopts the California Green Building Standards Code, Title 24, Part 11, 2019 2022 Ed.

California Code of Regulations, for the improvement of public health, safety and general welfare by enhancing the design and construction of buildings through the use of building co ncepts having a reduced negative impact or positive environmental impact and encouraging sustainable construction practices. Hereinafter termed "Cal Green," and each and all of the regulations, appendices, provisions, penalties, conditions and terms of suc h Code (one copy of which code has been filed for use and examination by the public in the office of the Building Official) are referred to and are adopted and made a part hereof, the same as if fully set forth in this chapter, and are adopted as sections of this chapter bearing the same numerical sections, designations, titles as appear in the California Building Code except as excepted, modified or amended in this chapter. ( Ord. No. 2255 , § 3(Att. 4), 12-3-2019)

3.a
Packet Pg. 143
Attachment: CC Ordinance ~ Reach Codes (Second Reading of Ordinance 2290) Title 18 – Building Codes and Regulations

18.26.020 Modifications.

Section 102.3 Verification. Shall be modified to read:

Prior to final building inspection and occupancy for projects included in this chapter, documentation of conformance for applicable green building measures shall be provided to the enforcing agency uploaded into CalCerts or Cheers as CF3R forms. Alternate methods of documentation shall be acceptable when the enforcing agency finds that the proposed alternate documentation is satisfactory to demonstrate substantial conformance with the intent of the proposed green building measure. When required by the Building Official, a qualified independent green building professional shall provide evidence of adequate green building compliance or documentation to the Building Official to satisfy the requirements of compliance for residential and non-residential projects covered under this chapter. The Building Official shall make the final determination whether a project meets the requirements of this chapter.

18.26.030 Definitions.

All Electric Building- A building that contains no combustion equipment or plumbing for combustion equipment serving space heating (including fireplaces), water heating (including pools and spas), cooking appliances (including barbeques), and clothes drying, within the building or building property lines, and instead uses electric heating appliances for service.

ALTERATION OR ALTER. Any construction or renovation to an existing structure other than repair for the purpose of maintenance or addition.

COMBUSTION EQUIPMENT. Any equipment or appliance used for space heating, water heating, cooking, clothes drying and/or lighting that uses fuel gas.

ELECTRIC HEATING APPLIANCE. A device that produces heat energy to create a warm environment by the application of electric power to resistance elements, refrigerant compressors, or dissimilar material junctions, as defined in the California Mechanical Code.

Electric Vehicle Charging Station (EVCS)- One of more electric vehicle charging spaces served by electric vehicle chargers that allow for the charging of electric vehicles.

EV Capable- Having the electric panel sized to accommodate future EV charging a nd having in-place the conduit raceway and junction boxes necessary for rapid installation of the breaker and wiring to provide EVCS.

EV Ready- Having EV charging ready for use.

FUEL GAS. A gas that is natural, manufactured, liquefied petroleum, or a mixture of these.

NEWLY CONSTRUCTED (or NEW CONSTRUCTION)- “Newly constructed building” shall be defined as a building that has never before been used or occupied for any purpose, and for the purposes of this Chapter shall include a construction project where an alteration includes replacement or addition of over 75 percent of the wood frame construction (New, Using Portions of the Existing).

18.26.040 Storm Water Management
Cal Green Section 4.106.2 and in support of Bay Area Storm Water Management Agencies Association (BASMAA) All residential homes, ADU’s, condominiums, and townhouses that undergo additional roof area for habitation or non-habitation shall include in the design, a storm water management system utilizing roof gutters, down spouts, leaders, drain pipes, drain swales, seepage pits, retention basins, and/or French drains

3.a
Packet Pg. 144
Attachment: CC Ordinance ~ Reach Codes (Second Reading of Ordinance 2290) Title 18 – Building Codes and Regulations

to retain storm waters on-site and not to flow to the public storm system in the street or to a neighboring property. These actions will reduce the volume of landscape watering required and offer protection from bay pollutants caused by contaminated run off.

18.26.050 Electric Vehicle Charging
Cal Green Section 4.106.4 Electric Vehicle (EV) Charging for New Construction (Single Family Homes) (EV Ready); All residential new homes, ADU’s, condominiums, and townhouses are required to provide one completed and ready to use (Level 1) 110 volt, 20-ampere, NEMA 1-20, 2 pole, 3 wire receptacle and a (Level 2) 208/240 volt, 40-ampere, NEMA 14-40, 3 pole, 4 wire receptacle, dedicated and labeled as EV Charging in the garage, or outside of the garage or near a parkway in a weatherproof cover (NEMA 3R) in the proximity of a vehicle parking area. If the living unit does not have a designated off -street parking area, the Building Official shall make the determination as to a reasonable and safe EV charging system placement or an exemption to the ordinance.

Cal Green Sections 4.106.4.2.1, 4.106.4.2.2, 4.106.4.2.3, 4.106.4.2.3 Multifamily Development Projects Electric Vehicle (EVCS)- All multifamily new construction shall make operational, the increased EV ready requirements of Cal Green as follows:
a. Multifamily with private garages: One (Level 1) 110 volt, 20-ampere, NEMA 1-20, 2 pole, 3 wire, and one (Level 2) 208/240 volt, 40-ampere, NEMA 14-40, 3 pole, 4 wire receptacle, dedicated and labeled as EV Charging
b. Multifamily with shared Parking: 60% of all parking stalls or spaces to have a (Level 1) 110 volt, 20 - ampere, NEMA 1-20, 2 pole, 3 wire, and 40% of all stalls or spaces to have (Level 2) 208/240 volt, 40 - ampere, NEMA 14-40, 3 pole, 4 wire receptacle, dedicated and labeled as EV Charging Cal Green Sections 5.1006.5.3.1, 5.1006.5.3.2, 5.1006.5.3.3, 5.1006.5.3.4, 5.1006.5.3.5 Nonresidential Development Projects Electric Vehicle (EVCS)- All commercial new construction shall make operational, the increased EV ready requirements of Cal Green as follows:
a. Offices: 20% of all parking stalls or spaces to have a (Level 1) 110 volt, 20 -ampere, NEMA 1-20, 2 pole, 3 wire dedicated and labeled as EV Charging. And 30% of all stalls or spaces to be EV capable that would included electric panel sizing, conduit and infrastructure to support (Level 2) 208/240 volt, 40 - amp
b. Other non-residential: 10% of all parking stalls or spaces to have a (Level 1) 110 volt, 20 -ampere, NEMA 1-20, 2 pole, 3 wire dedicated and labeled as EV Charging. And 10% of all stalls or spaces to be EV capable that would included electric panel sizing, conduit and infrastructure to support (Level 2) 208/240 volt, 40-amp
Electric vehicle charging locations and equipment and placement and accessible rou tes shall be compliant to California Accessibility (CBC 11B-228.3 and 11B-812).

Automatic Load Management System (ALMS). A control system designed to manage load across one or more electric vehicle supply equipment (EVSE), circuits, panels and to share electrical capacity and/or automatically manage power at each connection point. ALMS systems shall be designed to deliver no less than 3.3 kVa (208/240 volt, 16-ampere) to each EV Capable, EV Ready or EVCS space served by the ALMS, and meet the requirements of California Electrical Code Article 625. The connected amperage to the building site for the EV charging infrastructure shall not be lower than the required connected amperage per California Green Building Standards Code, Title 24 Part 11.

Alterations of Existing Parking Areas- The mandatory provisions of Section 4.106.4.2 may apply to additions or alterations of existing parking facilities or the addition of new parking facilities serving existing multifamily buildings.

3.a
Packet Pg. 145
Attachment: CC Ordinance ~ Reach Codes (Second Reading of Ordinance 2290) Title 18 – Building Codes and Regulations

The mandatory provisions of Section 5.106.5.3 may apply to additions or alterations of existing parking facilities or the addition of new parking facilities serving existing nonresidential buildings.

NOTE: Repairs including, but not limited to, resurfacing, restriping, and repairing or maintaining existing lighting fixtures are not considered alterations for the purpose of this section.

( Ord. No. 2260 , § 1, 2-18-20 As modified 2022)

18.26.060 Electrification
All Newly constructed residential living units and New Dwellings Using Portions of the Existing Structure. shall be prohibited from using natural gas in the living unit.

Exception 1: This section does not prohibit the use of propane gas for outdoor barbeque, grilling, woking, or warming fires.

All Newly constructed multi family and commercial buildings shall be prohibited from using natural gas in the building.

Exception1: This section does not prohibit the use of propane gas for outdoor barbeque, grilling, woking, or warming fires.

Exception 2: In the event that propane or natural gas is essential for the process or service, specific to the business of use or event, a permit application shall be made under “Building Official Determination” whereas the Building Official shall make reasonable determination for the allowance of such use.

18.26.070 Limited Exemptions from Electrification Standards (a) Purpose. The City recognizes certain services and/or operations rely on gas service or would be rendered infeasible if required to use electric service in their processes. In such circumstances, a limited exemption from the City’s Electrification Standards (CMC 18.26.060) may be warranted. The purpose and intent of this section is to outline the regulations for a limited exemption from the standards. (b) Exemption Process. The City shall not approve any request for a limited exemption from electrification standards except upon a complete and duly filed application on the then-current form prepared by the City. (c) Review Criteria. The applicant always bears the burden to demonstrate why a limited exemption should be granted. The following criteria shall be used by the Building Official to determine if there is an operational necessity for natural gas service that warrants a limited exemption from the electrification standards. (1) Gas dependent processes. Industrial and certain commercial uses, which require the use of natural gas for specific operational processes, shall be allowed use of natural gas for that need. Examples include, but shall not be limited to, metallurgy, glass blowing, pottery, research and development uses, and certain medical processes.
(2) Commercial cooking. Commercial restaurants and similar commercial food preparatory facilities shall be permitted natural gas service for food preparation. Examples include, but shall not be limited to, restaurants, bakeries, grocery stores, and commercial kitchens. (3) Cost prohibitive. Gas service shall be permitted when it can be demonstrated that the 10-year life- cycle cost analysis of installing and using all-electric equipment will be 50% or greater than that that of using natural gas and/or would render the project financially infeasible. When estimating the life-cycle cost, all calculations will assume the purchase and use of all new equipment. (4) Emergency services. Natural gas may be permitted for facilities providing emergency services.

Examples include backup generators for wireless cell towers and public heating centers. (5) Reconstruction after damage or destruction. A nonconforming structure which is involuntarily damaged or partially destroyed to the extent that the cost of restoration does not exceed seventy- five percent of the cost of construction of a comparable new structure (as determined by the

3.a
Packet Pg. 146
Attachment: CC Ordinance ~ Reach Codes (Second Reading of Ordinance 2290) Title 18 – Building Codes and Regulations

Building Official) may be restored or reconstructed; provided, the restoration is started within twelve months thereafter.
(d) Electric Service Wiring Required. In the event a limited exemption is granted, electric service will still be required to any location where a primary gas connection is made. (e) Decision. The Building Official shall notify the applicant of the decision rendered electronically through the City’s online permitted system, by email, or by first class mail. (f) Revocation. The Building Official may revoke a limited exemption, and require that gas service be disconnected and capped, if upon receipt of a business license application and/or building permit application, the criteria used to grant the limited exemption may no longer be made. (g) Appeals from Building Official Decision. The applicant or any interested person or entity may file an appeal to the Community Development Department of any decision made by the Building Official in compliance with this chapter. The appeal shall be filed within ten (10) days of the Building Official’s decision, with the city clerk in writing and accompanied by a filing fee in compliance with the city's schedule of fees and charges. The Community Development Director, or Community Development Director's designee, in his or her discretion, shall determine whether to affirm, set side, or modify the Building Official's decision appealed therefrom based on a review of the same criteria used by the Building Official. Thereafter, the appellant shall be notified of the Community Development Director’s decision. (h) Appeals from Community Development Director Decision. The applicant or any interested person or entity may file an appeal to the Building Board of Appeals of any decision made by the Community Development Director in compliance with this chapter. The appeal shall be filed within ten (10) days of the Community Development Director’s decision, with the city clerk in writing and accompanied by a filing fee in compliance with the city's schedule of fees and charges. The Building Board of Appeals, in their discretion, shall determine whether to affirm, set side, or modify the Community Development Director’s decision appealed therefrom based on a review of the same criteria used by the Community Development Director. Thereafter, the appellant shall be notified of the decision.

(Ord. No. 2175, § 3(Att. 6), 2-18-2014)
Chapter 18.32 DETERMINATION OF SCOPE OF WORK

18.32.010 Definition of "Scope of Work."
A project submitted as a "Remodel" or "Remodel and Addition," or a "Remodel of an accessory structure to create an accessory dwelling unit" (or similar scope of work) shall instead be considered a nd defined as a "New Dwelling using portions of the original structure" when at least three of the following criteria are satisfied:
(1) The valuation of the proposed work exceeds one hundred eighty -five thousand dollars (valuation calculated using established Valuations from Tables published by the International Code Council (ICC) the most current RS Means- Square Foot and Estimating software and book series and modified by the Building Division);
(2) Seventy-five percent or more of the existing roof framing (Area) is proposed to be removed. Existing roof covered by a new roof shall be considered as removed for the purposes of this calculation; (3) Seventy-five percent or more of the existing exterior walls (Lineal Footage of Wall Length) are removed, altered, filled in, or rebuilt. In no event shall new exterior walls exceed more than seventy - five percent of the length of the existing exterior walls as determined by the building official.

Nonconforming exterior walls shall not be included in the twenty-five percent remaining calculation (this subsection shall not apply to a proposed conversion of an accessory structure to an accessory dwelling unit);

3.a
Packet Pg. 147
Attachment: CC Ordinance ~ Reach Codes (Second Reading of Ordinance 2290) Title 18 – Building Codes and Regulations

(4) Seventy-five percent or more of the existing interior walls (Lineal Footage of Wall Length) are removed, altered, filled in, or rebuilt. In no event shall new interior walls exceed more than seventy -five percent of the length of the existing interior walls as determined by the building official. (Ord. No. 2175, § 3(Att. 6), 2-18-2014; Ord. No. 2223, § 3(Exh. A), 5-16-2017, eff. 6-15-2017; Ord. No. 2252 , § 14, 11-19-2019)

18.32.020 Process of appeal.

In the event that an applicant disagrees with the findings above, an appeal can be made to the Building Board of Appeal.

The results of all appeals shall be final.
(Ord. No. 2175, § 3(Att. 6), 2-18-2014)

3.a
Packet Pg. 148
Attachment: CC Ordinance ~ Reach Codes (Second Reading of Ordinance 2290)

Title 20 - SUBDIVISION AND LAND DEVELOPMENT

20.36.150 Utilities.

Utility facilities adequate to supply communication, electrical, gas, water and fire protection service to each lot of the subdivision shall be constructed and installed within the subdivision. All other provisions concerning the undergrounding of utilities are contained in Section 21.18.140, (Undergrounding of utilities) of the Campbell Municipal Code.
(Ord. 1619 § 1(part), 1986).
(Ord. No. 2166, § 3(Exh. B), 5-7-20

Exhibit A-5

3.a
Packet Pg. 149
Attachment: CC Ordinance ~ Reach Codes (Second Reading of Ordinance 2290)

City
Council
Report

TITLE: Agreement Between the County of Santa Clara, on Behalf of the Santa Clara County Sheriff, and the Campbell Police Department for the County to Provide CLET S Access to the Campbell Police Department. (Resolution/Roll Call Vote)

RECOMMENDED ACTION

That the City Council adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to enter into an agreement with the County of Santa Clara to provide CLETS access to the Camp bell Police Department.

BACKGROUND

The Santa Clara County Sheriff’s Office currently provides the Campbell Police with connectivity to the California Law Enforcement Telecommunications System (CLETS) through their county dedicated message switch pursuant to Government Code section 15163 at our agency’s expense. The proposed agreement will serve to memorialize the verbal agreement already in place with the County as well as to outline the roles and responsibilities of each party and the cost allocation for the service.

DISCUSSION

The Department of Justice uses CLETS to send law enforcement bulletins and other notifications to local law enforcement and criminal justice agencies and to provide agencies with access to federal and state criminal justice datab ases, including the Automated Criminal History System, Wanted Persons System, Stolen Vehicle System, Automated Boat System, Automated Firearm System, Automated Property System, Restraining and Protective Order System, Supervised Release File, Missing and Unidentified Persons System, California Sex and Arson Registry, Department of Motor Vehicles, Cal-Photo, and the National Crime Information Center.

Campbell Police Department acquires our connection to CLETS through the Santa Clara County Sheriff’s Office message switch known as the SLETS system. Previously , there was no written agreement in place outlining agency and provider responsibilities or methods for fee calculations and cost allocation.

The County of Santa Clara, on behalf of the Sheriff ’s Office, drafted a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) to be signed by all parties receiving CLETS services through the Item: 4
Category: CONSENT CALENDAR
Meeting Date: November 15, 2022
4 Packet Pg. 150
Agreement with Santa Clara County for CLETS Access Page 2 of 3 County SLETS system to better define roles, responsibilities, and methods for cost allocation.

As part of the proposed agreement , the Sheriff ’s Office will provide Virtual Private Network ( VPN) hardware configuration and installation, VPN account management, software upgrades and fixes, CLETS audit requests, network security, technical support, troubleshooting, help desk software support, and n etwork connectivity.

Campbell Police will be responsible for providing workstations, AES connections, installation and service of T1, Campbell Police IT contact, and management and support for all user accounts. Campbell Police must ensure all persons with access to CLETS comply with the training and background requirements outlined in the current version of the CLETS policies and are responsible for the physical security of CLETS terminals.

FISCAL IMPACT
The fiscal impact for the current FY 22 -23 is $28 ,745.77. The costs for access to CLETS through the county was previously based on the number of terminals assigned to each agency. The new billing method will be based on usage by Campbell Police and other agencies in the County and will vary yearly. Costs for this have been included within the FY 22 -23 Adopted Budget under the Communications division and account 101.602.7430. No budgetary adjustments are being requested at this time.

Prepared by:
4 Packet Pg. 151
Andrea Atkinson, Support Services
Manager
Agreement with Santa Clara County for CLETS Access Page 3 of 3 Reviewed by:

Gary Berg, Police Chief
Approved by:

Brian Loventhal, City Manager
Attachment:
a. CLETS MOU resolution
b. SLETS MOU Campbell PD.
4 Packet Pg. 152
RESOLUTION NO._____

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

CAMPBELL TO AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO APPROVE AN AGREEMENT

BETWEEN SANTA CLARA COUNTY AND CAMPBELL POLICE DEPARTMENT FOR THE SERVICE OF PROVIDING CLETS ACCESS.

WHEREAS, the Department of Justice uses CLETS to send law enforcement bulletins and other notifications to local law enforcement agencies and provides agencies with access to federal and state criminal justice databases; and

WHEREAS, the Santa Clara County Sheriff’s Office currently provides the Campbell Police Department with access to CLETS with no agreement in place; and

WHEREAS, Santa Clara County, on behalf of the Office of the Sheriff, drafted an agreement to define each parties roles and responsibilities as they relate to connectivity and the access to CLETS information; and

WHEREAS, the cost allocation is clearly defined as being based on Campbell Police and other departments use of the system.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Campbell authorize the City Manager to enter into the agreement with Santa Clara County for them to provide CLETS access to the Campbell Police Department.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 15th day of November, 2022, by the following roll call vote:

AYES: Councilmembers

NOES: Councilmembers

ABSENT: Councilmembers
APPROVED:

________________________
Paul Resnikoff, Mayor
ATTEST:

____________________________________
Andrea Sanders, City Clerk

4.a
Packet Pg. 153
Attachment: CLETS MOU resolution (Agreement with Santa Clara County for CLETS Access) Access for Campbell PD to Santa Clara County Message Switch (CLETS and CJIC)

AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA

AND THE CAMPBELL POLICE DEPARTMENT

This Agreement is made and entered into by and between the County of Santa Clara (“County”), on behalf of its Office of the Sheriff, and the Campbell Police Department (“Campbell PD”) to govern access by Campbell PD to the California Law Enforcement Telecommunications System (CLETS). County and Campbell PD are referred to each as a “Party” and collectively as the “Parties.”

WHEREAS, the California Department of Justice (DOJ) uses CLETS to send law enforcement bulletins and other notifications to local law enforcement and criminal justice agencies and to provide these agencies with access to federal and state databases, including the Automated Criminal History System (ACHS), Wanted Persons System, Stolen Vehicle System, Automated Boat System, Automated Firearm System, Automated Property System, Restraining and Protective Order System, Supervised Release File, Missing and Unidentified Persons System, Mental Health Firearms Prohibition System, Armed Prohibitive Persons System, California Sex and Arson Registry, Department of Motor Vehicles, Cal-Photo, and the National Crime Information Center.

WHEREAS, the California DOJ requires that all law enforcement and criminal justice agencies with CLETS access must comply with the requirements in the CLETS Policies, Practices, and Procedures (“CLETS PPP”) and the Federal Bureau of Investigations Criminal Justice Information Services Security Policy (“FBI CJIS Security Policy”).

WHEREAS, pursuant to Government Code section 15163 and Section 1.4.4(A) of the CLETS PPP, the CLETS County Control Agent is responsible for providing CLETS access to any law enforcement or criminal justice agency qualified by the California DOJ (known as a “Subscribing Agency”) that desires connection through the county message switch at its own expense.

WHEREAS, the Office of the Sheriff is the CLETS County Control Agent for Santa Clara County and manages the Santa Clara County Message Switch and related data circuits, routers, and VPN connections (known as the “SLETS system”).

WHEREAS, the County’s Criminal Justice Information Control (CJIC) system stores and processes local criminal justice information, including local criminal offender record information and local summary criminal history information.

WHEREAS, some law enforcement and criminal justice agencies in Santa Clara County connect to CJIC through the SLETS system.

WHEREAS, Campbell PD is a CLETS Subscribing Agency located in Santa Clara County that desires, at its own expense, to access CLETS and CJIC through the SLETS system.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises herein contained, County and Campbell PD, intending to be bound, hereby agree as follows:

4.b
Packet Pg. 154
Attachment: SLETS MOU Campbell PD. (Agreement with Santa Clara County for CLETS Access) Access for Campbell PD to Santa Clara County Message Switch (CLETS and CJIC)

1. DESCRIPTION OF AGREEMENT

This document and the following exhibits are specifically incorporated by reference and shall be collectively referenced hereafter as the “Agreement”:

Exhibit A Security
Exhibit B Cost Allocation
Exhibit C Scope of Work

In the event of an inconsistency or conflict between or among the provisions of this Agreement, the inconsistency or conflict shall be resolved by giving precedence in the following order: (1) This document; (2) Exhibit A; (3) Exhibit B; (4) Exhibit C.

2. AGREEMENT TERM

The Agreement shall be effective upon execution by the Parties (the “Effective Date”). The Agreement shall remain in effect for a period of five years from the Effective Date, unless terminated earlier by one of the Parties pursuant to Section 12.

3. DEFINITIONS

Unless otherwise defined, the following terms shall the meanings as set forth below:

a. “County” shall mean the County of Santa Clara, a political subdivision of the State of California.

b. “County Confidential Information” shall include all material, non-public information (including material, non-public County Data) appearing in any form (including, without limitation, written, oral or displayed), that is disclosed, directly or indirectly, through any means of communication by County, its agents or employees, to Campbell PD, its agents or employees, or any of its affiliates or representatives.

c. “County Data” shall mean data and information received by Campbell PD from County.

County Data includes any information or data, except for CLETS Data, that is transported across a County network, or that resides in a County-owned information system, or on a network or system under the control and management of a contractor for use by County.

As between Campbell PD and County, all County Data shall remain the property of County.

d. “CLETS Data” shall mean data and information received by Campbell PD from CLETS, including data from federal and state databases.

e. “Days” or “days” shall mean calendar days.

f. “State” shall mean the State of California.

4.b
Packet Pg. 155
Attachment: SLETS MOU Campbell PD. (Agreement with Santa Clara County for CLETS Access) Access for Campbell PD to Santa Clara County Message Switch (CLETS and CJIC)

4. NON-EXCLUSIVE AGREEMENT

The Agreement does not establish an exclusive contract between the County and the Campbell PD. By way of example and not limitation, the County reserves its rights to enter into similar agreements with other law enforcement and criminal justice agencies.

5. SCOPE OF COUNTY’S RIGHTS

The rights and remedies of the County provided under any of the provisions of this Agreement shall not be exclusive and are in addition to any other rights and remedies provided by law or equity.

6. PAYMENT

Campbell PD shall remit payments on a quarterly basis to the County for access to CLETS and CJIC through the County’s message switch, as set forth in Exhibit B (Cost Allocation).

7. TRAVEL

Each Party shall be solely responsible for its own travel, lodging, boarding and out-of-pocket expenses. Neither Party shall compensate or reimburse the other for any such costs.

8. LIMITED WARRANTY

County represents and warrants to Campbell PD that the CJIC system and County-owned software will perform in a reasonable manner during the term of this Agreement. County’s entire liability and sole remedy of Campbell PD’s under this section shall be termination of the Agreement.

9. DISCLAIMER OF WARRANTIES

THE LIMITED WARRANTY SET FORTH IN THE LIMITED WARRANTY SECTION IS IN

LIEU OF ALL OTHER WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT

LIMITED TO THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE. The warranty stated in the Limited Warranty section is the sole and the exclusive warranty offered by County. County makes no other warranties of any kind respecting the SLETS system, CJIC system, County-owned software, and third-party software, either express or implied, including but not limited to any warranty of design, quality, accuracy, data integrity, lack of viruses, bugs, worms, back doors, and Trojan horse computer programs, completeness, performance, of merchantability, or of fitness for a particular purpose, even if County has been informed of such purpose. No agent or employee of County is authorized to alter or exceed the warranty obligations of County as set forth herein.

10. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY

4.b
Packet Pg. 156
Attachment: SLETS MOU Campbell PD. (Agreement with Santa Clara County for CLETS Access) Access for Campbell PD to Santa Clara County Message Switch (CLETS and CJIC)

Campbell PD acknowledges and agrees that the consideration which County is charging hereunder does not include any consideration for assumption by County of the risk of Campbell PD damages which may arise in connection with Campbell PD use of the SLETS system, CJIC system, County-owned software, and third-party software. Accordingly, except for the indemnity obligations set forth in Section 14, Campbell PD agrees that County shall not be liable to Campbell PD or its users for any damages, including loss-of-profit, indirect, incidental, special, consequential, liquidated, exemplary, or punitive damages arising out of the licensing, sublicensing or use of the SLETS system, CJIC system, County-owned software, and third-party software. Except for the indemnity obligations set forth in Section 14, the County’s liability shall not exceed the fee paid by Campbell PD to County for use of the SLETS system, CJIC system, County-owned software, and third-party software under this Agreement.

11. OWNERSHIP

Campbell PD acknowledges and agrees that the CJIC system, County-owned software, and any modifications thereto are the sole property of County. Campbell PD has no right, title, or interest to the CJIC system, County-owned software, or modifications thereto other than a license granted herein to access or use of the CJIC system and County-owned software for lawful purposes.

12. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT

Either Party may terminate this Agreement for any reason by providing the other Party with at least two hundred (200) days’ prior written notice of such termination.

13. NO ASSIGNMENT OR DELEGATION WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT

Campbell PD may not assign any of its rights or delegate any of its duties under this Agreement without the prior written consent of County. No assignment or delegation will release Campbell PD from any of its obligations or alter any of its obligations to be performed under the Agreement. Any attempted assignment, delegation or subcontracting in violation of this provision is voidable at the option of the County and constitutes material breach by Campbell PD. As used in this provision, “assignment” and “delegation” means any sale, gift, pledge, hypothecation, encumbrance, or other transfer of all or any portion of the rights, obligations, or liabilities in or arising from this Agreement to any person or entity, whether by operation of law or otherwise, and regardless of the legal form of the transaction in which the attempted transfer occurs.

14. INDEMNIFICATION

In lieu of and notwithstanding the pro rata risk allocation, which might otherwise be imposed between the Parties pursuant to Government Code Section 895.6, the Parties agree that all losses or liabilities incurred by a Party shall not be shared pro rata but, instead, County and Campbell PD agree that, pursuant to Government Code Section 895.4, each of the Parties hereto shall fully indemnify and hold each of the other Parties, their officers, board members, employees, and agents, harmless from any claim, expense or cost, damage or liability imposed for injury (as

4.b
Packet Pg. 157
Attachment: SLETS MOU Campbell PD. (Agreement with Santa Clara County for CLETS Access) Access for Campbell PD to Santa Clara County Message Switch (CLETS and CJIC)

defined in Government Code Section 810.8) occurring by reason of the negligent acts or omissions or willful misconduct of the indemnifying party, its officers, employees or agents, under or in connection with or arising out of any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to such party under this Agreement. No party, nor any officer, board member or agent thereof shall be responsible for any damage or liability occurring by reason of the negligent acts or omissions or willful misconduct of the other Parties hereto, their officers, board members, employees, or agents, under or in connection with or arising out of any work authority or jurisdiction delegated to such other Parties under this Agreement.

15. NOTICES

All notices, requests, demands or other communications provided for or required by this Agreement shall be in writing. Notices shall be deemed to have been given when sent by registered or certified mail; when sent by overnight carrier with proof of sending; when sent by email if receipt is confirmed; or upon confirmation to sender of receipt of a facsimile communication followed by a mailed hard copy from sender. Notices shall be addressed to the individuals identified in this Section as the Office of the Sheriff Contact and the Campbell PD Contact. Each party may designate a different person and address by sending written notice to the other party, to be effective no sooner than ten (10) days after the date of receipt of the notice.

Office of the Sheriff Contact: John Zore ([email protected]) County of Santa Clara Sheriff’s Office
55 W. Younger Ave.

San José, CA 95110
(408) 808-4650
(408) 808-4662

Campbell PD Contact: Mihui Cho ( [email protected])
Campbell Police Department
70 N. First St.

Campbell, CA 95008
(408) 866-2100
(408) 866-2725

16. INFORMATION SECURITY COMPLIANCE

(1) For purposes of this section, the following definitions shall apply:

a. “Breach” shall mean unauthorized access to, or use of, County Data, CLETS Data, or information security networks or systems that compromises confidentiality, integrity, and/or availability those systems or County Data.
b. “Independent Penetration Testing,” or “pen testing,” shall mean the County’s practice— by using an independent third party—of testing a computer system, network or web application to find security vulnerabilities that an attacker could exploit. c. “Risk Assessment” shall mean the process by which the County’s Information Security Office (“ISO”) assesses (i) the Campbell PD’s information security program, and related

4.b
Packet Pg. 158
Attachment: SLETS MOU Campbell PD. (Agreement with Santa Clara County for CLETS Access) Access for Campbell PD to Santa Clara County Message Switch (CLETS and CJIC)

aspects, by identifying, analyzing, and understanding how the Campbell PD will store, process and transmit County Data and CLETS Data; and (ii) the potential impact on the County of any security risks, weaknesses and threats related to safeguarding County assets and County Data and CLETS Data. The Risk Assessment usually includes the ISO’s evaluation of documentation provided by the Campbell PD.

(2) Campbell PD shall do all of the following:

a. Maintain or improve upon its information security posture at the time of the County’s initial Risk Assessment as reasonably determined by the County. Campbell PD shall provide written notice to the County’s Information Security Office (“ISO”) of any changes or deficiencies to its information security posture. b. Protect the confidentiality, integrity, availability of County Data and CLETS Data and comply with any information security requirements provided to Campbell PD by the ISO for the entire term of the Agreement.
c. Follow any updated security requirements for the remaining term of the Agreement if the County re-evaluates the Risk Assessment, conducts periodic audits, and/or completes annual Independent Penetration Testing.
d. Upon discovering any Breach that could impact the County, whether caused by Campbell PD, its officers, employees, contractors or agents or others, Campbell PD shall notify the ISO at [email protected] and the Office of the Sheriff Contact identified in Section 15 within 24 hours and shall, as soon as reasonably possible, submit an Incident Report. Campbell PD shall also comply with all of its other obligations in this Agreement relating to breaches and potential breaches.
a. The Incident Report shall, at a minimum, include the following information:
i. Name of person reporting the incident
ii. Date of report
iii. Date of incident
iv. Points of contact, including phone number, extension, and email address v. Location(s) of incident
vi. Incident description
vii. System(s) affected (e.g. CAD, RMS, file server, etc.) viii. Method of detection
ix. Actions taken/resolution

17. CONFIDENTIALITY

Both Parties agree to comply with all applicable federal and state data privacy and security laws, regulations, and policies, including but not limited to California Penal Code §§ 11100 et seq. and 13100 et seq.; Code of Federal Regulations, title 28, part 20; California Code of Regulations, title 11, chapter 7, article 1; the current version of the FBI CJIS Security Policy; and the current version of the CLETS PPP.

18. COUNTY DATA AND CLETS DATA

4.b
Packet Pg. 159
Attachment: SLETS MOU Campbell PD. (Agreement with Santa Clara County for CLETS Access) Access for Campbell PD to Santa Clara County Message Switch (CLETS and CJIC)

a. Campbell PD shall not acquire any ownership interest in County Data (including County Confidential Information) or CLETS Data. As between Campbell PD and County, all County Confidential Information and/or County Data shall remain the property of the County. Campbell PD shall not, without County’s written permission, use, disclose, or make, keep, or maintain copies of County Data (including County Confidential Information) or CLETS Data other than in the performance of its law enforcement and criminal justice functions and its obligations under this Agreement. Campbell PD shall keep County Data (including County Confidential Information) and CLETS Data in strict confidence, using the same standard of care as it does with respect to its own confidential information, but in no event less than a reasonable degree of care. Campbell PD’s obligations to protect the confidentiality of County Data and CLETS Data survive termination or expiration of this Agreement.
b. Campbell PD shall be responsible for establishing and maintaining an information security program that is designed to ensure the security and confidentiality of County Data and CLETS Data, protect against any anticipated threats or hazards to the security or integrity of County Data and CLETS Data, and protect against unauthorized access to or use of County Data or CLETS Data that could result in substantial harm or inconvenience to County or any end users.
c. Campbell PD shall take appropriate action to address any incident of unauthorized access to County Data or CLETS Data, including addressing and/or remedying the issue that resulted in such unauthorized access, and notifying County by phone or in writing within 24 hours of any incident of unauthorized access to County Data or CLETS Data, or any other breach in Campbell PD’s security that materially affects County or end users. If the initial notification is by phone, Campbell PD shall provide a written notice within 5 days of the incident. Campbell PD shall be responsible for ensuring compliance by its officers, employees, agents, and subcontractors with the confidentiality, privacy, and information security requirements of this Agreement. Should County Confidential Information and/or legally protected County Data or CLET Data be divulged to unauthorized third parties, Campbell PD shall comply with all applicable federal and state laws and regulations, including but not limited to California Civil Code sections 1798.29 and 1798.82 at Campbell PD’s sole expense. Campbell PD shall not charge County for any expenses associated with Campbell PD’s compliance with these obligations. d. Campbell PD shall defend, indemnify and hold County harmless against any claim, liability, loss, injury or damage arising out of, or in connection with, the unauthorized use, access, and/or disclosure of information by Campbell PD and/or its agents, employees or sub-contractors, excepting only loss, injury or damage caused by the sole negligence or willful misconduct of personnel employed by the County.

19. COUNTY NO-SMOKING POLICY

Campbell PD and its employees, agents and subcontractors, shall comply with the County’s No Smoking Policy, as set forth in the Board of Supervisors Policy Manual section 3.47 (as amended from time to time), which prohibits smoking: (1) at the Santa Clara Valley Medical Center Campus and all County-owned and operated health facilities, (2) within thirty (30) feet surrounding County-owned buildings and leased buildings where the County is the sole occupant, and (3) in all County vehicles.

4.b
Packet Pg. 160
Attachment: SLETS MOU Campbell PD. (Agreement with Santa Clara County for CLETS Access) Access for Campbell PD to Santa Clara County Message Switch (CLETS and CJIC)

20. DISPUTES

In the event of any dispute arising out of or relating to this Agreement, the parties shall attempt, in good faith, to promptly resolve the dispute mutually between themselves. If the dispute cannot be resolved by mutual agreement, nothing herein shall preclude either party’s right to pursue remedy or relief by civil litigation, pursuant to the laws of the State of California.

21. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR

Campbell PD shall be solely responsible for the acts and omissions of its officers, agents, employees, contractors, and subcontractors, if any. Nothing herein shall be considered as creating a partnership or joint venture between the County and Campbell PD. No officer, agent, employee, contractor, or subcontractor of Campbell PD shall be considered an officer, agent, or employee of County, nor shall any such person be entitled to any benefits available or granted solely to employees of the County.

22. SEVERABILITY

Should any part of this Agreement between County and the Campbell PD be held to be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable in any respect, such invalidity, illegality, or unenforceability shall not affect the validity of the remainder of the Agreement which shall continue in full force and effect, provided that such remainder can, absent the excised portion, be reasonably interpreted to give the effect to the intentions of the parties.

23. NON-WAIVER

No waiver of a breach, failure of any condition, or any right or remedy contained in or granted by the provisions of this Agreement will be effective unless it is in writing and signed by County.

No waiver of any breach, failure, right, or remedy will be deemed a waiver of any other breach, failure, right, or remedy, whether similar or not, nor will any waiver constitute a continuing waiver unless the writing signed by the County so specifies.

24. HEADINGS AND TITLES

The titles and headings in this Agreement are included principally for convenience and do not by themselves limit the construction or interpretation of any provision in this Agreement, nor affect the rights or obligations of the parties to this Agreement.

25. HANDWRITTEN WORDS

Handwritten or typed words have no greater weight than printed words in the interpretation or construction of this Agreement.

26. AMBIGUITY

Any rule of construction to the effect that ambiguities are to be resolved against the drafting party does not apply in interpreting this Agreement.

4.b
Packet Pg. 161
Attachment: SLETS MOU Campbell PD. (Agreement with Santa Clara County for CLETS Access) Access for Campbell PD to Santa Clara County Message Switch (CLETS and CJIC)

27. ENTIRE AGREEMENT, MERGER

This Agreement and its Exhibits constitute the final, complete and exclusive statement of the terms of the agreement between the Parties. It incorporates and supersedes all the agreements, covenants and understandings between the parties concerning the subject matter hereof, and all such agreements, covenants and understandings have been merged into this Agreement. No prior or contemporaneous agreement or understanding, verbal or otherwise, of the parties or their agents shall be valid or enforceable unless embodied in this Agreement.

28. EXECUTION AND COUNTERPARTS

This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which will be considered an original, but all of which together will constitute one and the same instrument. The parties agree that this Agreement, its amendments, and ancillary agreements to be entered into in connection with this Agreement will be considered signed when the signature of a party is delivered a method described herein.

29. ELECTRONIC COPIES/SIGNATURES

Unless otherwise prohibited by law or County policy, the parties agree that an electronic copy of a signed contract, or an electronically signed contract, has the same force and legal effect as a contract executed with an original ink signature. The term “electronic copy of a signed contract” refers to a transmission by facsimile, electronic mail, or other electronic means of a copy of an original signed contract in a portable document or other format. The term “electronically signed contract” means a contract that is executed by applying an electronic signature using technology approved by the County.

30. SURVIVAL

All representations, indemnification obligations, and duties contained in this Agreement, or in any instrument, certificate, exhibit, or other writing intended by the Parties to survive this Agreement, will survive the termination of this Agreement.

31. GOVERNING LAW, JURISDICTION, AND VENUE

This Agreement shall be construed and interpreted according to the laws of the State of California, excluding its conflict of law principles. Proper venue for legal actions shall be exclusively vested in state or federal courts in Santa Clara County. The parties agree that subject matter and personal jurisdiction are proper in state or federal court in Santa Clara County.

Parties waive all venue and jurisdiction objections.

32. COUNTING DAYS

The time in which any act provided by this Agreement is to be performed is computed by excluding the first day and including the last, unless the last day is a Saturday, Sunday, or other legal holiday, and then it is also excluded.

4.b
Packet Pg. 162
Attachment: SLETS MOU Campbell PD. (Agreement with Santa Clara County for CLETS Access) Access for Campbell PD to Santa Clara County Message Switch (CLETS and CJIC)

33. MODIFICATION

This Agreement may be supplemented, amended, or modified only by the mutual agreement of the parties. No supplement, amendment, or modification of this Agreement will be binding on County unless it is in writing and signed by the County's authorized representative

34. THIRD PARTY BENEFICIARIES

This Agreement does not, and is not intended to, confer any rights, remedies, or benefits on any person or entity other than the parties.

35. AUTHORITY

Each party executing the Agreement on behalf of such entity represents that he or she is duly authorized to execute and deliver this Agreement on the entity’s behalf, including, as applicable, the Board of Supervisors, the Board of Directors, or Executive Director. This Agreement shall not be effective or binding unless it is in writing and approved by the County’s authorized representative, or authorized designee, as evidenced by his or her signature as set forth in this Agreement.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement on the date indicated below. This Agreement is not binding until fully executed by all Parties.

COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA CAMPBELL PD

____________________________________
Gene Clark, Date
Chief Procurement Officer

APPROVED

_____________________________________
Laurie Smith, Date
Sheriff

APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY

_____________________________________
Tara Lundstrom Date
Deputy County Counsel

4.b
Packet Pg. 163
Attachment: SLETS MOU Campbell PD. (Agreement with Santa Clara County for CLETS Access) Access for Campbell PD to Santa Clara County Message Switch (CLETS and CJIC)

EXHIBIT A

SECURITY

1. PURPOSE
This Exhibit is intended to satisfy the requirement in Section 5.1.1 of the FBI CJIS Security Policy that County and Campbell PD establish a formal information sharing agreement before exchanging federal Criminal Justice Information (“CJI”). As required by Section 5.1.1, this Exhibit outlines the roles and responsibilities between County and Campbell PD and specifies the security controls and conditions described in the FBI CJIS Security Policy, as well as the CLETS Policies, Practices, and Procedures (“CLETS PPP”).

2. ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
It is the responsibility of both Parties to ensure the protection of CJI and other CLETS-derived information (collectively, “CLETS Data”). Although each Party may impose more stringent protection measures, each must, at a minimum, meet the requirements set forth in this Exhibit.

Campbell PD will be responsible for the following:
• Applying appropriate security measures, as applicable, to ensure the physical security of terminals and telecommunication lines;
• Ensuring the information and systems under this Agreement are used only for authorized purposes;
• Ensuring that all personnel, including vendors, with access to CLETS Data, equipment, or systems or record storage areas, satisfy the fingerprint-based criminal background screening, training, and certification requirements mandated by the FBI CJIS Security Policy and the CLETS PPP;
• Applying technical security measures (e.g., Operating System updates, anti-virus protection, software updates, audit logs, etc.) to protect against unauthorized use and dissemination and protect data security; and
• Testing of security controls in place, which can involve a third-party audit or a formal self-assessment that meets the FBI CJIS Security Policy for testing security controls.

Additionally, each Party must establish an information security structure that provides for an Information Security Officer (ISO) or a security point of contact.

3. SECURITY AWARENESS TRAINING
All users with authorized access to CLETS Data, the CJIC system, or unescorted access to a record storage area shall receive the appropriate level of security training (i.e., Levels 1 through 4 based on their role in the organization and job function) within six months of initial assignment and biennially thereafter. The training must cover the topics required for each level by the FBI CJIS Security Policy and CLETS PPP.

4. INCIDENT RESPONSE
Each Party shall have an appropriate incident response plan in place. To ensure the protection of CLETS Data, each Parties shall: (i) establish operational incident handling procedures that

4.b
Packet Pg. 164
Attachment: SLETS MOU Campbell PD. (Agreement with Santa Clara County for CLETS Access) Access for Campbell PD to Santa Clara County Message Switch (CLETS and CJIC)

include adequate preparation, detection, analysis, containment, recovery, and user response activities; and (ii) track, document, and promptly report incidents to appropriate agency officials and/or authorities. Upon request, Campbell PD will provide County with the incident response plan for its systems connecting to the CJIC system.

Sections 16 and 18 of the Agreement specify the Campbell PD’s obligations for reporting incidents to the County.

5. AUDITING AND ACCOUNTABILITY
Each Party shall implement audit and accountability controls to increase the probability of authorized users conforming to a prescribed pattern of behavior. County is responsible for generating and maintaining audit logs for the CJIC system. Campbell PD is responsible for generating and maintaining audit logs for its CAD-RMS system and, if applicable, Mobile Data Management (MDM). These systems must be able to generate audit logs for defined events, including those set forth in FBI CJIS Security Policy § 5.4.1.1. At a minimum, these systems shall produce, at the application and/or operating system level, audit records containing sufficient information to establish what events occurred, the sources of the events, and the outcomes of the events.

Audit logs must contain the following events and contents:

Events:
• Successful and unsuccessful system log-on attempts.
• Successful and unsuccessful attempts to use:
o access permission on a user account, file, directory or other system resource; o create permission on a user account, file, directory or other system resource; o write permission on a user account, file, directory or other system resource; o delete permission on a user account, file, directory or other system resource; o change permission on a user account, file, directory or other system resource. • Successful and unsuccessful attempts to change account passwords. • Successful and unsuccessful actions by privileged accounts (i.e. root, Oracle, DBA, admin, etc.).
• Successful and unsuccessful attempts for users to:
o access the audit log file;
o modify the audit log file;
o destroy the audit log file.

Content:
• Date and time of the event.
• The component of the information system (e.g., software component, hardware component) where the event occurred.
• Type of event.
• User/subject identity.
• Outcome (success or failure) of the event.

4.b
Packet Pg. 165
Attachment: SLETS MOU Campbell PD. (Agreement with Santa Clara County for CLETS Access) Access for Campbell PD to Santa Clara County Message Switch (CLETS and CJIC)

Each Party will conduct an audit review and analysis of audit logs on a weekly basis for indications of inappropriate or unusual activity; investigate suspicious activity or suspected violations; report findings to appropriate officials; and take necessary actions.

Each Party shall protect audit information and audit tools from modification, deletion, and unauthorized access. At a minimum, the Parties are required to keep audit logs for a minimum of three years.

6. ACCESS CONTROL
Campbell PD shall manage information system accounts, including establishing, activating, modifying, reviewing, disabling, and removing accounts. Campbell PD shall validate information system accounts at least annually and shall document the validation process.

Campbell PD shall only grant access based on the following:
• Valid need-to-know/need-to-share as determined by the County; and • Satisfaction of all personnel security criteria.

Campbell PD shall notify the County as soon as reasonably possible of the following:
• A user’s information system usage or need-to-know or need-to-share changes. • A user is terminated or transferred or associated accounts are removed, disabled, or otherwise secured.

Each Party shall develop access control policies and associated access enforcement mechanisms to control access between users and objects in the CJIC system.

Systems that handle CLETS Data shall display an approved system use notification message, before granting access, informing potential users of various usages and monitoring rules.

7. CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT
Any planned or unplanned changes to the hardware, software, and/or firmware components of Campbell PD’s information systems connecting to the County’s network could have significant impact to the overall security posture of the County. Before any changes occur, the following requirements must be satisfied:
• Only qualified and authorized individuals have access and can make changes to the information system.
• Campbell PD must configure the application, service, or information system to provide only essential capabilities. All others shall be specifically prohibited. • Campbell PD must notify the County of any such change. • As required by the CLETS PPP and/or upon request, Campbell PD must submit a complete topological drawing (network diagram), depicting the interconnectivity of the Campbell PD network, to the County.

4.b
Packet Pg. 166
Attachment: SLETS MOU Campbell PD. (Agreement with Santa Clara County for CLETS Access) Access for Campbell PD to Santa Clara County Message Switch (CLETS and CJIC)

8. MEDIA PROTECTION
Each Party shall restrict all access to digital and physical media in all forms to authorized individuals. Each Party must have a policy and procedures in place that define securely handling, transporting, and storing media.

Media Protection must include the following:
• Media should be restricted to authorized personnel, if physical and personnel restrictions are not feasible then the data must be encrypted.
• For transporting media, encryption is required.
• Sanitization of media shall mean overwrite at least three times or degauss digital media prior to disposal or release for reuse by unauthorized individuals. • Inoperable media shall be destroyed (cut up, shredded, etc.). • Physical media shall be destroyed by shredding or incineration.

Each Party shall take appropriate measures for media sanitization and disposal that adhere to the FBI CJIS Security Policy’s requirements for media sanitization and disposal. Each Party shall have a Certificate of Destruction, which shall be witnessed or carried out by authorized personnel.

9. PHYSICAL PROTECTION
Each Party will utilize a physically secure location for protecting CLETS Data and associated information systems. These protections shall include:
• Separating through a perimeter non-secure locations from secure locations; • Maintaining a current list of personnel with authorized access to secure physical locations, which includes visitor control;
• Maintaining a physical access point to verify individual access authorizations before granting access, and the ability to monitor physical access to detect and respond to physical security incidents;
• Maintaining physical access controls in place for distribution and transmission lines as well as position information system devices that prevent unauthorized individuals from accessing and viewing CLETS Data; and
• Authorizing and controlling information system-related items entering and exiting the physical secure location.

10. SYSTEM AND COMMUNICATIONS PROTECTION AND INFORMATION

INTEGRITY
Each Party will utilize systems and communications safeguards that range from boundary and transmission protections to securing a virtualized environment.

Applications, services, or information systems must have safeguards in place that detect and protect against unauthorized changes to software and information.

The network infrastructure must control the flow of information between interconnected systems.

4.b
Packet Pg. 167
Attachment: SLETS MOU Campbell PD. (Agreement with Santa Clara County for CLETS Access) Access for Campbell PD to Santa Clara County Message Switch (CLETS and CJIC)

Campbell PD shall have the following IT security protections in place:
• Boundary Protection (including use of proxies, gateways, guards, encrypted tunnels, firewalls, and routers that employ rule sets of establish configuration settings that restrict information system services or provide a packet filtering capability); • Encryption in Transit that is FIPS 140-2 certified and use a symmetric cipher key strength of at least 128-bit strength;
• Encryption at Rest that is FIPS 197 certified (AES) and at least 256-bit strength; • An Intrusion Detection System (IDS) that is network-based and/or host-based intrusion detection or prevention tools;
• Usage restrictions, change default administrative passwords, and a Virtual Local Area Network (VLAN) technology that segments VoIP traffic from data traffic if using a Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) capability;
• If utilizing a Cloud Solution, cloud environments must reside within the physical boundaries of an APB member country (i.e., U.S., U.S. territories, Indian Tribes, and Canada) and legal authority of an APB-member agency (i.e., U.S. – federal/state/territory, Indian Tribe, or the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP)).

Metadata shall not be used for any advertising or other commercial purposes by any cloud service provider or other associated entity;
• Virtualization
o Audit log files for all virtual machines and hosts must have the capability to store the logs outside the hosts virtual environment
o Virtual Machines that are Internet facing (web servers, portal servers, etc.) shall be physically separate from Virtual Machines (VMs) that process CJI internally or be separated by a virtual firewall
• Patch schedule in place to fix vulnerabilities;
• Malicious code protection that includes automatic updates for all systems with Internet access; and
• Spam and spyware protection.

11. PERSONNEL SECURITY
All Campbell PD personnel who have access to unencrypted CLETS Data will adhere to the FBI CJIS Security Policy’s personnel screening requirements before access is granted. All other requirements include the following:
• Upon termination of personnel accessing the CJIC system, Campbell PD shall notify the County as soon as reasonably possible to terminate access. Campbell PD will coordinate and ensure all access is terminated.
• Upon personnel transfer, Campbell PD shall ensure appropriate actions, such as closing and establishing accounts and changing system access authorizations, are conducted. • Upon personnel sanctions, Campbell PD shall employ a formal sanctions process for personnel failing to comply with established information security policies and procedures.

4.b
Packet Pg. 168
Attachment: SLETS MOU Campbell PD. (Agreement with Santa Clara County for CLETS Access) Access for Campbell PD to Santa Clara County Message Switch (CLETS and CJIC)

12. MOBILE DEVICES
For all mobile devices accessing CLETS Data and/or the CJIC system, Campbell PD shall:
• Be enrolled in a Mobile Device Management (MDM), which will allow the following:
o Establish usage restrictions and implementation guidance for mobile devices; and o Authorize, monitor, control wireless access to the information system.

Campbell PD shall utilize 802.11 wireless protocols that meets FIPS 140-2 requirements and will not utilize weak cryptographic algorithms (Wired Equivalent Privacy (WEP), Wi-Fi Protected Access (WPA), etc.).

The use of mobile devices requires the use of a Mobile Device Management (MDM). Any phones that have been rooted or jailbroken shall not be used to process, store, or transmit CLETS Data at any time.

4.b
Packet Pg. 169
Attachment: SLETS MOU Campbell PD. (Agreement with Santa Clara County for CLETS Access) Access for Campbell PD to Santa Clara County Message Switch (CLETS and CJIC)

EXHIBIT B

COST ALLOCATION

The cost allocation below is billed on a quarterly basis with the fiscal year starting July 1.

FY21-22 FY22-23
CJIC (34 terminals) FY21-22 $12,187.98
CJIC (63 users) Starting FY22-23 $15,000.00
ASE Circuit $4,137.48 $4,716.48
SLETS (estimated based on usage) $7,821.01* $8,410.17*
Cisco Smartnet $440.20 $619.12
Total: $24,586.67 $28,745.77
*These costs represent the estimated SLETS costs for Campbell PD for FY21-22 and FY22-23.

Final SLETS costs will vary depending on actual usage by Campbell PD and the other law enforcement agencies in Santa Clara County that access SLETS. The total cost of providing SLETS is allocated among all agencies at the end of each fiscal year quarter according to actual usage.

4.b
Packet Pg. 170
Attachment: SLETS MOU Campbell PD. (Agreement with Santa Clara County for CLETS Access) Access for Campbell PD to Santa Clara County Message Switch (CLETS and CJIC)

EXHIBIT C

SCOPE OF WORK

The primary network, SLETS Message Switch, and VPN appliances are installed at 55 W.

Younger Ave., San José, California—the headquarters for the Office of the Sheriff. The Office of the Sheriff will provide Campbell PD with access to California DOJ and CJIC databases and services via the SLETS system. Campbell PD will also have access to the network infrastructure and will be able to provision desktop PCs and printers with access to CLETS and CJIC over a secure network connection.

I. Campbell PD RESPONSIBILITIES

Campbell PD is responsible for the following:

a. Campbell PD will deploy stand-alone desktop workstations which are connected to the T1 or ASE circuit with a static IP address. All fees and costs associated with installation and maintenance of T1 or ASE service are the responsibility of Campbell PD. b. Campbell PD will set up each user as an individual user on the stand-alone desktop, and corresponding Cisco VPN software will be installed to facilitate secure SSL-VPN communication between Campbell PD and the Office of the Sheriff. c. Campbell PD will provide site contacts and a method to work with a Campbell PD IT staff person who can manage the Campbell PD CLETS PC in a secure manner. d. Campbell PD is responsible for the purchase and installation of terminal emulation software used to connect to CJIC.
e. Campbell PD must ensure:
o All personnel with access to the CLETS must comply with the training and backgrounding requirements in the current version of the CLETS PPP and FBI CJIS Security Policy.
o All CLETS terminals must satisfy the physical security and cybersecurity requirements in the current version of the CLETS PPP and FBI CJIS Security Policy, including anti-virus and firewall requirements. f. Campbell PD must adhere to CLETS PPP’s personnel access policies and maintain user lists with CLETS access training dates for all Campbell PD users. g. Campbell PD must designate a point of contact (Local Administrator) for Cal-Photo and other DOJ website related issues.
h. Campbell PD must manage and maintain their own Cal-Photo user accounts and other DOJ websites.
i. Campbell PD must manage and maintain their own CJIC user accounts.

II. OFFICE OF THE SHERIFF RESPONSIBILITIES

The Office of the Sheriff is responsible for providing the following:

a. Level II and VPN hardware and software configuration, installation, and testing; b. VPN user account provisioning and management;

4.b
Packet Pg. 171
Attachment: SLETS MOU Campbell PD. (Agreement with Santa Clara County for CLETS Access) Access for Campbell PD to Santa Clara County Message Switch (CLETS and CJIC)

c. VPN and SLETS upgrade or patch deployments;
d. CLETS user account provisioning and management;
e. CLETS journal and audit requests;
f. Network security and device access management and support; g. Technical assistance with resetting and troubleshooting VPN, connectivity, and CLETS mnemonic and user accounts;
h. Help desk support related to software provided and managed by the Office of the Sheriff;
i. Quarterly billing statements per the State Fiscal year; j. Access to the DOJ network for CLETS, including Cal-Photo and other DOJ websites; k. Access to the County of Santa Clara network for CJIC access; and l. Network connectivity and support between the Campbell PD and the Office of the Sheriff.

The Office of the Sheriff is NOT responsible for providing the following:

a. Technical assistance related to Campbell PD PC software not related to CLETS access; or
b. Technical assistance related to Campbell PD’s internal network. c. Terminal Emulation software to connect to CJIC.

4.b
Packet Pg. 172
Attachment: SLETS MOU Campbell PD. (Agreement with Santa Clara County for CLETS Access)

City
Council
Report

TITLE: Accept Donations from the Campbell Parks and Recreation Foundation and Rotary Club of Campbell for Hyde Park Playground Renovations (Resolution/Roll Call Vote)

RECOMMENDED ACTION

That the City Council adopt a resolution accepting donations from the Campbell Parks and Recreation Foundation in the amount of $7,800 and the Rotary Club of Campbell in the amount of $7,000 (combined total donation amount of $14, 800), for the Hyde Park Playground Renovations and approving associated budget adjustments to recognize donation revenue and donation related expenditures.

BACKGROUND
The Hyde Park property was dedicated to the City of Campbell on April 26, 1995 as a gift from the San Jose Water Company. The downtown park is located at the base of the historic Campbell Water Tower and includes a children’s swing set and small grass area with a bench for visitors. Despite its small size and few amenities, Hyde Park has served as a sanctuary for downtown patrons and members of the community alike for over 27 years.

Until recently, Hyde Park’s only play structure was the children’s swing set and had remained in use by the public since its original installation in 1995. Staff has become aware, in recent years, that replacement was becoming increasing necessary as the structure continued to age with prolonged use. In April 2022, staff contacted the vendors at Miracle Play Systems and ordered the replacement structure. The new swing set was delivered in October 2022 and immediately installed after the removal of the original swing set.

DISCUSSION
The recent replacement of Hyde Park’s original (and only) playground structure prompted staff to further evaluate the park’s con dition and identify improvements that would reduce the City’s long -term maintenance costs while adding play value to the community. Due to Hyde Park’s lack of amenities, staff focused on the addition of new structures to the children’s playground area and improvements to the surrounding landscape that would enhance the park’s overall appearance. Additionally, staff considered the associated renovation costs and are working within a reasonable budget, based on the City’s available funds , for use of park -related maintenance and Item: 5
Category: CONSENT CALENDAR
Meeting Date: November 15, 2022
5 Packet Pg. 173
Campbell Park Donations Page 2 of 3
repairs. Next, staff contacted the vendors at Miracle Play Systems to explore equipment options and customize an installation plan designed for the park’s smaller playground area. Also, the company offered to honor all quoted prices t hrough the end of 2022 and waive the standard 50% down-payment required at the time of order. With these added benefits in mind, staff submitted their interest in five new equipment pieces and requested a quote for the related pricing. Including this quote, staff anticipates the Hyde Park renovations will cost a total of approximately $23,000.

During staff’s preparation of the renovation plans, members of the Campbell Parks and Recreation Foundation and Rotary Club of Campbell offered to support the City’s efforts with donations in the amounts of $7,800 and $7,000 respectively on behalf of each organization in support of renovating Hyde Park. Upon acceptance, the combined donation of $14,800 will provide over half of the estimated $23,000 total in renov ation- related costs, while reducing the City’s contribution down to approximately $9,000 of the remaining balance. Staff proposes to fund the remainder of the project out of the Parks Maintenance Operating budget.

At this time, staff would like to thank t he Campbell Parks and Recreation Foundation and Rotary Club of Campbell for their generous contributions and continued support of Citywide improvement programs. The City of Campbell recognizes their dedication to the preservation and expansion of resource s benefiting the community for many years to come.

FISCAL IMPACT
Staff anticipates the Hyde Park renovations will cost a total of approximately $23,000 .

The City will use the donated funds of $14,800 to offset the total cost of the project. The enclosed budget adjustment recognizes the donation revenue and associated donation related expenditures. The remaining balance of approximately $9,000 will be funded through the FY23 Operating budget and does not require a budget adjustment as this time. The do nated funds will cover most of the renovation -associated costs, while greatly reducing the City’s long -term maintenance costs and deferring the need for equipment replacement by an additional 20-plus years.

Prepared by:

Carina Shattuck,

Reviewed by:

Todd Capurso, Director of Public Works
5 Packet Pg. 174
Campbell Park Donations Page 3 of 3

Approved by:

Brian Loventhal, City Manager

Attachment:
a. Resolution
b. Budget Adjustment Form
5 Packet Pg. 175
RESOLUTION NO. ______________

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CAMPBELL

ACCEPTING MONETARY DONATIONS FROM THE CAMPBELL PARKS AND

RECREATION FOUNDATION AND ROTARY CLUB OF CAMPBELL FOR HYDE

PARK PLAYGROUND RENOVATIONS AND APPROVING ASSOCAITED BUDGET

ADJUSTMENTS TO RECOGNIZE DONATION REVENUE AND DONATION

RELATED EXPENDITURES

WHEREAS, Hyde Park’s only playground feature has been a children’s swing set that was recently replaced in October 2022; and

WHEREAS, the City has recognized the need for additional playground equipment upon replacement of the original swing set; and

WHEREAS, improvements to the surrounding landscape would enhance the park’s overall appearance and accommodate newly added playground features; and

WHEREAS, the City has selected five new playground equipment pieces to be installed, along with landscaping upgra des, that would reduce the City’s long -term maintenance costs and increase value to the public; and

WHEREAS, the total cost of the improvements is estimated at $23,000; and

WHEREAS, the Campbell Parks and Recreation Foundation and Rotary Club of Campbell have presented the City with donations in the amounts of $7,800 and $7,000 respectively on behalf of their support for the improvement efforts of Hyde Park; and

WHEREAS, the attached budget adjustment form recognizes donation revenue and donation related expenditures; and

WHEREAS, the City has sufficient operating budget to fund the balance of the project in the amount of approximately $9,000 and does not require a further budget adjustment at this time;

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council accept the combined total donation amount of $14,800 to be used for the Hyde Park Playground Renovations

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED staff will make the necessary budget adjustments for the renovation-related costs upon City Council’s acceptance of donations from the Campbell Parks and Recreation Foundation and Rotary Club of Campbell and that the attached budget adjustment form is approved and incorporated by reference.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this _______ day of __________, 2022 by the following roll call vote:

5.a
Packet Pg. 176
Attachment: Resolution (Campbell Park Donations)
AYES: Councilmembers:

NOES: Councilmembers:

ABSENT: Councilmembers:

APPROVED:

____________________________
Paul Resnikoff, Mayor
ATTEST:

_______________________________
Andrea Sanders, City Clerk

5.a
Packet Pg. 177
Attachment: Resolution (Campbell Park Donations)
City of Campbell
Request for Budget Adjustments
Department/Program Division Date Request No.

November 15, 2022 BA-10
Budget to be Reduced
Fund/Program Account Number Description Amount
Budget to be Increased
Fund/Program Account Number Description Amount

EXPENDITURES
207.775 7428 Hyde Park Playground Renovations funded by donations 14,800

REVENUES
207.775 4818 Donation from Campbell Parks and Recreation Foundation 7,800 207.775 4818 Donation from Rotary Club of Campbell 7,000 REASON FOR REQUEST - BE SPECIFIC:

Finance Director Public Works Director City Manager
Public Works
Will Fuentes Todd Capurso Brian Loventhal
To recognize $7,800 in donations from Campbell Parks and Recreation Foundation and $7,000 from Rotary Club of Campbell.

The total donation of $14,800 will be appropriated towards the Hyde Park Playground Renovations. 775 - Park Maintenance

5.b
Packet Pg. 178
Attachment: Budget Adjustment Form (Campbell Park Donations)

City
Council
Report

TITLE: Public Hearing to Consider the Application by TDDGUS (Applicant for Owner), for a Major Planned Development Permit Modificati on and Extension of Approval (PLN -2022-13) to Allow for Revisions to the Architectural Design and Changes in Floor Area of a Previously Approved Planned Development Permit for a 6 -Lot Single -Family House Subdivision and to Extend the Approval of the Previo usly Approved Tentative Map , for Property Located at 1429 & 1445 Westmont Avenue in the P-D (Planned Development) Zoning District.

RECOMMENDED ACTION

The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council take the following action: Adopt a Resolution , approving a Major Planned Development Permit Modification and Extension of Approval (PLN -2022-13) to allow for revisions to the architectural design and changes in floor area of a previously approved Planned Development Permit for a 6 -lot single -family ho use subdivision and to extend the approval of the previously approved tentative map (including carrying over Public Works Conditions of Approval from prior entitlements, and a new Condition of Approval to supersede prior entitlements), and finding the proj ect Categorically Exempt under Section 15332 of the California Environmental Quality Act.

ENVIRONMENTAL (CEQA) DETERMINATION
Staff and the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council find that this project is Categorically Exempt under Section 153 32 (Class 32) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pertaining to in-fill development projects.

PROJECT DATA
Zoning District: P-D Planned Development
General Plan: Low Density Residential (Less than 6 units/gross acre) Lot Area: 54,804 square feet
Lot Lot
size
Height 1st
Story
2nd
Story
Garage
area
Bldg.
area
FAR
(45%
max)
Lot Cov.
(40%
max)
1 6,916 24’-6” 1,425 1,257 420 3,102 44.8% 31.1%
2 6,526 26’-2” 1,209 1,239 441 2,889 44.3% 28.3%
Item: 6
Category: PUBLIC HEARINGS AND

INTRODUCTION OF

ORDINANCES
Meeting Date: November 15, 2022
6 Packet Pg. 179
PLN-2022-13 ~ 1429 & 1445 Westmont Avenue Page 2 of 10
3 6,526 25’-6” 1,209 1,239 441 2,889 44.3% 28.3%
4 6,569 24’-3” 1,362 1,162 431 2,954 44.9% 31.0%
5 6,569 24’-3” 1,362 1,162 431 2,954 44.9% 31.0%
6 9,906 25’-5” 2,390 1,608 441 4,439 44.8% 31.1%
Lot A* 11,792 - - - - - - -
Total 54,804 - - - - - - -
*Lot A is the common lot that contains the shared private road.

Previous approved square footages
Lot Lot
size
Height 1st
Story
2nd
Story
Garage
area
Bldg.
area
FAR
(45%
max)
Lot
Cov.
(40%
max)
1 6,916 24’- 3’’ 1,577 1,048 425 3,050 44.1% 29.2%
2 6,526 24’-6’’ 1,805 696 424 2,925 44.8% 37.1%
3 6,526 24’-7’’ 1,805 696 424 2,925 44.8% 36.7%
4 6,569 25’-8’’ 1,553 962 435 2,950 44.9% 32.7%
5 6,569 23’-1’’ 1,553 962 435 2,950 44.9% 31.8%
6 9,906 25’-9’’ 2,295 1,506 628 4,429 44.7% 30.6%

BACKGROUND
In 2019, the City Council approved a Zoning Map Amendm ent, Planned Development Permit, Tentative Subdivision Map, Tree Removal Permit, and adopted a mitigated negative declaration for the construction of six two -story single-family residences. The site was proposed to have one single -family residence oriented towards Westmont Avenue with the remaining five single -family residences oriented towards the private road located along the eastern property line.
6 Packet Pg. 180
PLN-2022-13 ~ 1429 & 1445 Westmont Avenue Page 3 of 10

Figure 1: Previously Approved Site Plan

The proposed project is maintaining the p arcel configuration and sizes as previously approved by the City Council with one single -family residence oriented towards Westmont Avenue and the remaining five residences oriented towards the private road.

At its meeting of October 11, 2022, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the subject item. After due consideration, the Planning Commission adopted a resolution recommending the City Council approve the project as presented on a 6 -0-1 decision.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Applicant’s Proposal: The applicant is requesting approval of a Major Planned Development Permit Modification and Extension of Approval to allow for revisions to the architectural design and changes to the floor area for the six -lot single -family development. The extension of appro val is to allow for the tentative map to be extended by a period not to exceed 24 months. The proposal results in an overall slight decrease to the total building square footages from the previous entitlement.

Per the Project Description ( reference Attachment B), the applicant wishes to change the floor plans to allow for larger bedrooms and to change the architecture to better cater to potential buyers.

The submitted site plan (reference Attachment C – Project Plans) depicts a single - family residence oriented towards Westmont Avenue and the remaining five single-family detached homes oriented towards the shared private street. Along the shared private street are 12 guest parking spaces with planting areas in between.

Staff recommendation includes incorporating the Public Works Conditions of Approval for the previous entitlements and adding a Condition of Approval to supersede the conditions of approval for the prior Planned Development Permit . The purpose of such action is to ensure the Conditions of Appro val of the Major Planned Development Permit Modification are the effective conditions of approval as opposed to the Planned Development Permit.
6 Packet Pg. 181
PLN-2022-13 ~ 1429 & 1445 Westmont Avenue Page 4 of 10

Figure 2: Proposed Site Plan

Project Location: The project site is generally locat ed at the northeast corner of Harriet Avenue and Westmont Avenue and is located within the San Tomas Area Neighborhood Plan. The project site is an approximately 54,804 square foot site, surrounded by single-family residential uses.

Figure 3: Project Location

ANALYSIS
General Plan:

The General Plan Land Use designation for the property is Low Density Residential (<6 units/gross acre). The General Plan Land Use designation of Low Density Residential 6 Packet Pg. 182
PLN-2022-13 ~ 1429 & 1445 Westmont Avenue Page 5 of 10
(<6 units/gross acres) pr ovides for detached single -family homes (on lots that are typically 6,000 square feet). The project would result in lots in excess of 6,000 square feet and at a density of 4.5 dwelling units per gross acre, and therefore, is consistent with this designation.

The proposed project complies with the General Plan land use designation.

Zoning Code:

The project site has a zoning designation of P-D Planned Development. The P-D zoning district is intended to provide a degree of flexibility that is not available in other zoning districts to allow developments that are more consistent with site characteristics while creating an optimum quantity and use of open space and good design.

The P-D zoning was approved with the previous planning permits, granted in 2019. Per the subdivision ordinance, access upon a public street is required. When a property is constrained and is unable to provide access to a public street, a change of zoning to P - D may be permissible to allow street access to be provided by a private road.

There are no changes to the zoning proposed for this project.

The San Tomas Area Neighborhood Plan requires that the subdivision comply with the development standards (e.g. setbacks, floor area ratio) of the R -1 zoning district, except where a private road may be utilized.

Requirement Lot 1 Lot 2 Lot 3 Lot 4 Lot 5 Lot 6
Front Yard
Setback
20-feet 25-feet 25-feet 25-feet 21’-10” 26’-5” 20’-3”
Side Yard
Setback
Greater of 5-
feet, or ½
the height of
the building
wall
adjacent to
property line
12’-0”
street
side, 6 -
feet
interior
9’-4”
and 9’ -
8”
9’-4”
and 9’ -
8”
6’-0”
and 6’ -
6”
6’-6”
and 6’ -
0”
8’-3”
and
11’-8”
Rear Yard
Setback
20-feet 22’-5” 25’-11” 25’-11” 30’-6” 30’-6” 32’-6”
Max
building
height
28-feet and
2 ½ stories
25’-6” 26’-2” 25’-6” 24’-3” 24’-3” 25”-5”

San Tomas Area Neighborhood Plan: The project site is located in the San Tomas Area Neighborhood Plan. The San Tomas Area Neighborhood Plan contains design criteria which are intended to ensure compatibility and site plan consistency with the neighborhood. The design criteria states that new homes should incorporate representative architectural features of homes within the San Tomas area, such as shape, form, roof pitch, and materials.
6 Packet Pg. 183
PLN-2022-13 ~ 1429 & 1445 Westmont Avenue Page 6 of 10
The project incorporates gabled roofs with composition shingle, w ood siding and stucco exteriors throughout the project, which is commonly found in the San Tomas area.

Furthermore, the mass and scale of the new homes are compatible with the homes found in the San Tomas area, as the incorporated horizontal design element s provides a visual break in building mass from the first floor to the second floor. Additionally, the second floor is stepped back from the first floor which further reduces the bulk of the homes. The houses also contain facades with a variety of windows and architectural details (such as columns, porches, corbels) to allow for architectural interest and to reduce unarticulated massing and facades. Lastly, the project incorporates a variety of architectural styles ranging from craftsman inspired to farmhou se modern and each house looks different.

Administrative Procedure : Pursuant to Section 21.12.030(H) of the CMC, a Major Planned Development Permit Modification Permit is required when additional square footage or a substantial alteration in design is proposed.

The project proposes a substantial change in architectural design. All six single -family homes have a different architectural style than previously approved. The proposed architectural style varies from craftsman inspired and farmhouse modern.

The pr evious planning entitlement contained architectural styles that drew inspiration from ranch, craftsman, and Tudor architectural styles.

Figure 4: Previously Approved Elevation

6 Packet Pg. 184
PLN-2022-13 ~ 1429 & 1445 Westmont Avenue Page 7 of 10

Figure 5: Proposed Elevations
Parking: The project site provides 24 parking spaces on -site, 12 of which are provided in a two -car garage configuration and 12 surface parking spaces. Per the San Tomas Area Neighborhood Plan, two guest parking spaces per unit must be provided, therefore, a total of 12 guest parking spaces are required. The 12 surface parking spaces are the guest parking spaces. Per Section 21.28.040, a single -family dwelling requires two parking spaces, one of which shall be covered. Each house provides a two-car garage, and therefore satisfies the parking requirement. The project satisfies the parking requirement and there are no parking reductions or modifications requested.

Major Planned Development Permit Findings (Section 21.12.030 of CMC) : A substantial change in architecture may be allowed subject to approval of a Major Planned Development Permit after making all four (4) of the required findings described in italics below. An explanation of how the project does or does not meet each finding follows in plain text below.

1. The proposed development of uses clearly would result in a more desirable environment and use of land than would be possible under any other zoning district classification;
The six single-family residences would result in a more desirable environment and use of land than would be possible under any other zoning district classification. The creation of six residences would lead to an increase in the number of housing units resulting in better utilization of the land. The project proposes a priv ate street with access off Westmont Avenue leading to six single-family residences. The municipal code requires that properties must provide access to a public street. The project includes a private street to provide access to the residences which would no t be possible under conventional zoning.

2. The proposed development would be compatible with the General Plan and will aid in the harmonious development of the immediate area; The proposed project would be compatible with the General Plan and will aid in th e harmonious development of the immediate area. Allowing the development of six single -family homes will meet the purpose/intent of the Low Density Residential (<6 dwelling units per gross acre) General Plan land use designation which is to provide for the development of detached single - family homes on lots that are typically 6,000 square feet. The applicant’s 6 Packet Pg. 185
PLN-2022-13 ~ 1429 & 1445 Westmont Avenue Page 8 of 10
proposal may also be found to further the following General Plan policies and strategies:

Strategy LUT-5.2a: Neighborhood Compatibility : Promote new residential development and substantial additions that are
designed to maintain and support the existing character and development pattern of the surrounding
neighborhood, especially in historic neighborhoods and
neighborhoods with consistent design characteristics.

Strategy LUT-9.3e: Building Materials: Encourage the use of long -lasting, high quality building materials on all buildings to ensure the long-term quality of the built environment.

Policy LUT-17.1: San Tomas Area Neighborhood Plan (STANP): Comply with the requirements of the STANP.

Strategy LUT-17.1a: Lot Sizes: Ensure that new development and renovation provides low -density residential
development and encourage larger than minimum lot
sizes.

The project complies with the above General Plan p olicy and strategy by providing a six-lot single-family development that is consistent and compatible with the San Tomas Area Neighborhood Plan. Lastly, the project will aid in the harmonious development of the immediate area in that the six single - family houses complement the surrounding development pattern.

3. The proposed development will not result in allowing more residential units than would be allowed by other residential zoning districts which are consistent with the General Plan designation of the property; The project will not result in allowing more residential units than would be allowed by other residential zoning districts which are consistent with the General Plan designation of the property. The General Plan land use designation for the proper ty is Low Density Residential, which allows for 6 units per gross acre on lots that are typically 6,000 square feet. The project proposes a density of 4.5 dwelling units to the acre and therefore, is consistent with the General Plan designation of the prop erty. The General Plan designation of Low Density Residential only correlates to the R -1-6 zoning district, in which the project would not exceed the density allowances in that zoning district.

4. The proposed development would not be detrimental to the healt h, safety or welfare of the neighborhood or of the city as a whole;
The proposed development would not be detrimental to the health, safety or welfare of the neighborhood or of the city as a whole. The project is a six -lot two-story single-family residential project located within a residential area and complies with the regulations contained within the San Tomas Area Neighborhood Plan. The project provides for additional housing units within the city.
6 Packet Pg. 186
PLN-2022-13 ~ 1429 & 1445 Westmont Avenue Page 9 of 10
Extension of Approval (Section 21.56.030(D) : The app licant may request an extension of approval by a period not to exceed 24 -months to a previously approved permit given that good cause is shown. The extension is to extend the approval of the tentative parcel map. The applicant has shown progress on the project in submitting the final map application with Public Works, and the covenants, conditions, and restrictions (CC&Rs) to establish the homeowner’s association, and merely needs additional time to accommodate the requested architectural changes.

Site and Architectural Review Committee: The Site and Architectural Review Committee (SARC) reviewed this application at its meeting of August 23, 2022. There were questions and discussion regarding the type of fencing proposed, the adequacy of the private street (access, width, and whether trees would be incorporated along the private street), trash service pick -up, amount of pervious pavement utilized, and whether a homeowner’s association would be established. Lastly, a question was raised on whether there was community feedback on this project. Staff stated that there was a call from a nearby resident who had some questions and concerns regarding replacement of damaged fencing and tree species when the courtesy notice was sent out, but there has not been any additional feedback received by staff. The subcommittee did not raise any concerns regarding the project.

Planning Commission Review : T here were no public speakers at the public hearing.

The Planning Commission had questions regarding process, specifically the reason why the project is required to be heard by the Planning Commission and the City Council for architectural changes. Staff explained that the project architecture and square footage is different enough to warrant a Major Planned Development Permit Modification, which requires Planning Commission recommendation and City Council approval. The Commission also had a clarifying question on what needed to occur by the expiration of approvals deadline, to which staff stated a building permit must be obtain ed for the Major Planned Development Permit Modification and that a final map must be recorded at the County for the tentative map. There were no public speakers at the public hearing. The Planning Commission had questions regarding process, specifically t he reason why the project is required to be heard by the Planning Commission and the City Council for architectural changes. Staff explained that the project architecture and square footage is different enough to warrant a Major Planned Development Permit Modification, which requires Planning Commission recommendation and City Council approval. The Commission also had a clarifying question on what needed to occur by the expiration of approvals deadline, to which staff stated a building permit must be obtained for the Major Planned Development Permit Modification and that a final map must be recorded at the County for the tentative map.

Public Outreach: A courtesy notice was sent to property owners within 300 feet of the subject property when the application was submitted to the city. A public hearing notice was also sent to all property owners within 300 feet of the subject property and publicized in the newspaper (Metro). No public comments have been received.

FISCAL IMPACT
6 Packet Pg. 187
PLN-2022-13 ~ 1429 & 1445 Westmont Avenue Page 10 of 10 There are no fiscal impacts associated with this project.

ALTERNATIVES

1. Approve the project subject to additional and/or modified Conditions of Approval.

2. Continue for further review.

3. Deny the proposed project, to which the architectural modifications will not be permissible, and the Ext ension of Approval would not be granted. The applicant would retain the right to enact on previously granted planning entitlements.

Prepared by:

Tracy Tam, Associate Planner
Approved by:

Brian Loventhal, City Manager
Attachment:
a. Resolution
b. Project Description
c. Project_Plans
6 Packet Pg. 188
Reviewed by:

Rob Eastwood, Community Development Director

RESOLUTION NO.

BEING A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

CAMPBELL APPROVING A MAJOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT

MODIFICATION PERMIT AND EXTENTION OF APPROVAL FOR THE
TENTATIVE MAP (PLN-2022-13) TO ALLOW FOR REVI SIONS TO

THE ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN AND C HANGES IN FLOOR AREA

OF A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT

FOR A SIX-LOT SINGLE -FAMILY HOUSE SU BDIVISION AND TO

EXTEND THE APPROVAL OF THE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED
TENTATIVE MAP ON PROPER TY LOCATED AT 1429 & 1445
WESTMONT AVENUE.

After notification and public hearing, as specified by law and after presentation by the Community Development Director, proponents and opponents, the hearing was closed.

The City Council finds as follows with regard to file number PLN-2022-13:

1. The project s ite is zoned P-D (Planned Development ) on the City of Campbell Zoning Map.

2. The project site is designated Low Density Residential (<6 units/gr. acre) on the City of Campbell General Plan Land Use diagram.

3. The project site is an approximately 54,804 square-foot parcel located generally at the intersection of Westmont Avenue and Harriet Avenue.

4. The proposed project consists of a Major Planned Development Permit Modification and Extension of Approval (PLN-2022-13) to al low for revisions to the architectural design and changes in floor area of a previously approved Planned Development Permit f or a 6 -lot single-family house subdivi sion and to extend the approval of a previously approved tentative map.

5. The proposed project is in compliance with the estab lished minimum setback and maximum height requirements of the San Tomas Area Neighborhood Plan.

6. The proposed project will result in a Floor Area Ratio (FAR) ranging from 44.3 to

44.9%, where a maximum of 0.45 FAR is allowed in th e San Tomas Area Neighborhood Plan.

7. The proposed project will result in lot coverages ranging from 28.3 to 31.1%, where a maximum of 40 % lot coverage is allowed in the San Tomas Are a Neighborhood Plan.

8. The proposed project will provide two covered parking spaces in an attached garage for each unit for a total of 12 parking spaces, and 12 surface guest parking spaces, satisfying the applicable parking requirement of 24 parking spaces.

6.a
Packet Pg. 189
Attachment: Resolution (PLN-2022-13 ~ 1429 & 1445 Westmont Avenue) City Council Resolution No. ____ Page 2 of 3 PLN-2022-13 ~ 1429 & 1445 Westmont Ave – Major Planned Development Permit Modification and Extension of Approval

9. The proposed project will be compatible with the P-D (Planned Development) Zoning District with approval of a Major Planned Development Modification Permit.

10. The project is compatible with the architecture of the adjacent neighborhood in that the project incorporates representative architectural feat ures and complimentary materials of surrounding homes including the hipped roof forms, wood siding , and use of stucco.

11. The proposal is consistent with t he Considerations in Review of Applications (CMC Section 21.12.030) subject to Major Planned Devel opment Permit Modification and Extension of Approval.

12. No subs tantial evidence h as been presented which shows that the project, as currently presented an d subject to the required Conditions of Approval , will have a significant adverse impact on the environment.

Based upon the foregoin g findings of fact the City Council further finds a nd concludes that:

Major Planned Development Permit Findings (CMC Section 21.42.020):

1. The proposed development of uses clearly would result in a more desirable environment and use of land than would be possible under any other zoning district classification;

2. The proposed development would be compatible with the General Plan and will ai d in the harmonious development of the immediate area;

3. The proposed development will not result in allowing more resid ential units than would be allowed by other residential z oning districts which are consistent with the General Plan designation of the property;

4. The proposed development would not be detrimental to the health, safety or welfare of the neighborhood or of the city as a whole.

Extension of Approval Permit Findings (CMC Section 21.56.030):

5. The permittee has the burden of proof to establish, with substantial evidence that the applicant has made a good faith effort to fulfill all the requirements of the permit approval, the justification for extension of the permit.

Environmental Finding(s) (CMC Section 21.38/050):

6. This project is Categorically Exempt per Section 153 32, Class 3 2 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), pertaining to in-fill development projects.

7. No sub stantial evidence has been presented whi ch shows that the project, as currently presented and subject to the required conditions of approval, will have a significant adverse impact on the environment.

6.a
Packet Pg. 190
Attachment: Resolution (PLN-2022-13 ~ 1429 & 1445 Westmont Avenue) City Council Resolution No. ____ Page 3 of 3 PLN-2022-13 ~ 1429 & 1445 Westmont Ave – Major Planned Development Permit Modification and Extension of Approval

THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve a Major Planned Development Permit Modification (PLN-2022-13) to allow revisions to the architectural design and changes in floor area of a previously approved Planned Development Permit for a 6 -lot s ingle-family su bdivision and to ex tend the approval of the pre viously approved tentative parcel map on property located at 1429 & 1445 Westmont Avenue, subject to the attached Conditions of Approval (attached Exhibit “A”).

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 15th of November, 2022, by the following roll call vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:

APPROVED:

Paul Resnikoff, Mayor

ATTEST:

Andrea Sanders, City Clerk

6.a
Packet Pg. 191
Attachment: Resolution (PLN-2022-13 ~ 1429 & 1445 Westmont Avenue)

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Major Planned Development Permit Modification & Extension of Approval (PLN- 2022-13)

Where approval by the Director of Community Develo pment, City Enginee r, P ublic Works Direc tor, City Attorney or Fire Department is re quired, th at review shall be for compliance with all applicable conditions of ap proval, adopted policies and guide lines, ordinances, laws and regulations and accepted engineering practices for the item under review. A dditionally, the applicant is hereby n otified that he/she is required to comply with all applicable C odes or Ordinance s of the City o f Campbell and the State of California that pertain to this development and are not herein specified.

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT

Planning Division:

1. Approved Proje ct: Approval is granted for a Major Planned Development Modification Permit and Extension of Approval (PLN-2022-13) to allow for revisions to the architectural des ign and changes in floor area of a previously approved Planned Development Permit for a 6 -lot single -family house subdivision and to extend the approval of the previously approved tentative map, on property located at 1429 & 1445 Westmont Avenue . The proje ct shall subs tantially con form to the Project Plans , included as Attachment 2 in the Planning Commission Staff Report dated October 11 , 2022 , except as may be modifi ed by conditions of approval contained herein.

2. Permit Expiration:
a. Major Planned Developme nt Modification Permit: The Major Planned Development Modification Permit approval shall be valid through February 1, 2025. Within this period, a Building Permit must be obtained. Failure to meet this deadline or expiration of an issued building permit will result in the Major Planned Development Modification Permit being rendered void.
b. Extension of Approval: The Ex tension of A pproval shall be valid through February 1, 2025 . Within this period, the Tract Map ("final map") must be approved by the City Council and recorded with t he Santa Clara County Clerk - Recorder. Failure to meet this deadline will result in the Approval being rendered void.

3. Previous Entitlements: Upon the effectiv e date of this Approval, the previously approved Entitlements (Tentative Map and Tree Removal Permit) provided in PLN2018-236 and PLN2018 -239, (CC Resolution No. 12463 and 12464) shall remain in full force and effect, except as noted by Condition of Approv al No. 2. (Permit Expiration).

4. Conditions of Approval Superseded: The Conditions of Approval for the previously granted Planned Development Permit ( PLN2018-215; CC Reso lution No. 12462) shall be superseded by this entitlement (PLN-2022-13).

6.a
Packet Pg. 192
Attachment: Resolution (PLN-2022-13 ~ 1429 & 1445 Westmont Avenue) Exhibit A - Conditions of Approval Page 2 of 3 PLN-2022-13 ~ 1429 & 1445 Westmont Ave – Major Planned Development Permit Modification & Extension of Approval

5. Rough Framing and Planning Final Requi red: Planning Division clearance is required prior to rough framing and final Building Permit clearance. Construction not in substantial complianc e with t he approved project plans shall not be approved without prior authorization of the necessary approving body.

6. Minor Modifications: Minor Modifications to the approved project plans are subject to review and approval by the Community Development Dir ector. Minor modifications include alterati ons in floor area of no more than 50 square feet on the first floor (except for P D pe rmits where addit ional floor area is considered a major modification), alte rations t o second story windows that are not oriented toward neighboring yards and result in an increase in window area of no m ore than one square foot and horizon tal relocation of no more than one foot from the approved window location, and minor alterations to façade material. All other modifications are subject to review at a public hearing.

7. Plan Revisions: Upon prior approval by the Community Dev elopment Direct or, all Minor Modifications to the approved project plans shall be included in the construction drawings submitted for Building Permit. Any modifi cations t o the Building plan set during con struction shall require submittal of a Building Perm it Revision and approval by the Building Official prior to Final Inspection.

8. Fences/Walls: Except as noted below, a ny newly proposed fencing and/or walls shall comply wi th Campbell Municipal Code Section 21.18.060 and shall be submitted for review and approval by the Community Development Department.

9. Contractor Contact Information Posting : Th e project site shall be pos ted with the name and contact number o f the lead cont ractor in a location visible from the public street prior to the issuance of building permits.

10. Water Efficient Landscape Standards: As a remodel/addition/rehabilitation projec t with a total project land scape area equal to or less than 2,500 square feet , this project is subject to the landscaping and irrigation standards in Chapter 21.26 of the Campbell M unicipal Code . The Building Permit ap plication submittal shall include compliant Planting and Irrigation Plans and shall include the following:

a. A completed Landscape Information Form.
b. A no te on the Cover Sheet i n minimum 1/2” high lettering stating “Planning Final Required. The new landscaping indicated on the plans must be installed prior to final inspec tion. Changes to the landscaping plan require Plannin g approval.”
Note: If the project landscape area increase s duri ng the course of the pr oject, additional requirements will apply.

11. Construction Acti vities: The applicant shall ab ide by the following requir ements during construction:

6.a
Packet Pg. 193
Attachment: Resolution (PLN-2022-13 ~ 1429 & 1445 Westmont Avenue) Exhibit A - Conditions of Approval Page 3 of 3 PLN-2022-13 ~ 1429 & 1445 Westmont Ave – Major Planned Development Permit Modification & Extension of Approval
a. The project site shall be posted with the name and contact number of the lead contractor in a location visible from the public street prior to the issuance of a Building Permit.
b. Construction activities shall be limited to weekda ys between 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. and Saturdays bet ween 9:00 a.m. and 4 :00 p.m. No co nstruction shall take place on Sundays or holidays unless an exception is granted by the Building Official.
c. All construction equipment with in ternal combustion engines u sed on the project site shall be properly muffled an d maintained in good working condition.
d. Unnecessary idling of internal combustion engines shall be strictly prohibited. e. All stationary noise -generating construction equipment, s uch as air compressors and portable power generators, shall be located as far a s possible from nois e-sensitive rec eptors such as existing residences and businesses.
f. Use stan dard dus t and erosion contro l measures that co mply wi th the adopted Best Management Practices for the City of Campbell.

Public Works:

The scope of this project triggers the requirement for Frontage Improvements as required by Campbell Municipal Code 11.24.040. Per the San Tomas Area Neighborhood Plan, this section of Westmont Avenue has b een designated for new curb, gutter, sidewalk and park strip. Because this is a private street, the driveway is subject to a multi -family driveway. The applicant is subject t o all public improvements called out in these conditions.

12. Preliminary Grading and Utility Plans: The preliminary grading and utility plans shall be subject to modifications during the review of the construction documents and will be required to modify the various items as follows:
a. The applicant shall be required to modify the existing catch basin where the new driveway approach has been proposed. The modification to the existing catch basin shall be per the Detail SD -5 “Adaptation for Existing Catch Basi n in New Driveway” detail by the City of Santa Clara. The current proposal to convert the catch basin to an inlet is not permitted.
b. The proposed lateral storm drain connection shall be directly connected to the storm drain main on Westmont Avenue. The applicant shall show the existing storm drain main on Westmont, include relevant inf ormation in the construction plans to connect directly to the main with a SD manhole. The applicant may be required to extend the storm drain main if necessary to the project site longitudinally.
c. All private 6” storm drain laterals from the biotreatment a reas connecting to the 12” SD shall meet the minimum materials and construction requirements as if these were in the public right of way.
d. Storm sump w/pump will be subject to review during the construction review process. A backflow valve may be required d ownstream from the pump.

6.a
Packet Pg. 194
Attachment: Resolution (PLN-2022-13 ~ 1429 & 1445 Westmont Avenue) Exhibit A - Conditions of Approval Page 4 of 3 PLN-2022-13 ~ 1429 & 1445 Westmont Ave – Major Planned Development Permit Modification & Extension of Approval
Given the critical nature of the pump, two pumps will be required for redundancy. Applicant will also be required to provide an alert system that notifies the HOA in the event of a pump malfunction. Maintenance of the storm drain l ateral from the sump pump to the new manhole in Westmont Avenue shall be the responsibility of the HOA.
e. All maintenance and replacement work for the storm drain lateral conne ction to the main shall be the responsibility of the homeowner (HOA). This shall be incorporated in the CC&R’s.
f. Joint Trench shall be installed within the required Public Service Easement outside of the sidewalk area along the Westmont Avenue frontage (al ong Lot 1 and portions of the common area fronting Westmont Avenue). g. The proposed joint trench along the proposed lot frontages shall be located either with in the common area or the applicant shall provide an easement for the proposed joint trench along t he lot frontages. The proposed joint trench crossing property lines without an easement is not permitted. h. Where the existing retaining wall ends on the easterly boundary, the applicant will be required to extend the retaining wall to end at least 5 feet pa st th e proposed sump pump area.
i. The applicant will be required to design the buil ding plans so that there is a closed roof drain system i.e. downspouts shall be connected and sent to the biotreatment.

13. Construction Drawings: The applicant shall submit th e required Tract Map, Street Improvement Plans, and Grading and Drainage Plans dir ectly to the Public Works Department prior to, or concurrent with the Building permit application. Said application shall include the following:
a. Response Letter: Upon submittal of the required plans, the applicant shall provide an itemized response lette r verifying that all the Public Works Conditions of Approval have been met or addressed.
b. Submittal Requirements: The checklist for the various plans required for submittal can be found on the City’s Website at City Services ►Public Works►Engineering►Land D evelopment►Documents, (or use this link:
http://www.cityofcampbell.com/206/Documents). See instructions on:
i. Checklist for Tract Map
ii. Checklist for Grading and Drainage
iii. Checklist for Street Improvement Plans
iv. Vacation of Right of Way Requirements

14. Vacation of Public Street and Easements: Prior to recordation of the Final Map, the applicant shall fully complete the street vacat ion process. The applicant shall submit a vacation of excess right -of-way application for approval by the City Engineer, pay the current application proces sing fee, process the application with City staff’s comments and fully complete the street vacation.

6.a
Packet Pg. 195
Attachment: Resolution (PLN-2022-13 ~ 1429 & 1445 Westmont Avenue) Exhibit A - Conditions of Approval Page 5 of 3 PLN-2022-13 ~ 1429 & 1445 Westmont Ave – Major Planned Development Permit Modification & Extension of Approval

15. Final Map: Prior to issuance of any grading or building permits for the proj ect, the applicant shall submit a Final Map for review by the City and recorda tion, upon approval by the City Council, pay various fees/deposits and submit the map in a digital format acceptable to the City.

16. Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions: Provide copies of CC&Rs for review by the City prior to recordation of the Final Map and CC&Rs. Maintenance of the stormwater treatment facilities shall be part of the CC&Rs. All biotre atment facilities located on individual private properties proposed on the pr eliminary Stormwater Management Plan shall be the responsibility of the HOA to maintain. These biotreatment areas shall not be maintained by each of the homeowners.

17. Preliminary Title Report : Upon submittal of the Final Map, the applicant shall provide a current (within the past 3 months) Preliminary Title Report.

18. Public Service Easement: Upon recordation of the Final Map, the applicant shall grant a public service easement on private property contiguous with the public right - of-way and within Lot 1 and the common area fronting Westmont Avenue, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. The applicant shall cause all documents to be prepared by a registered civil engineer/la nd surveyor, as necessary, for the City’s review and recordation.

19. Private Eas ements: Upon recordation of the Final Map, the applicant shall cause private easements to be recorded for private utilities, private storm drains, reciprocal ingress and egress, emergency vehicles, etc.

20. Monumentation for Final Map: Prior to recordation o f the Final Map, the applicant shall provide a cash deposit for setting all mo numents shown on the map.

Monuments shall be set per section 20.76.010 of the Campbell Municipal Code including but not limited to setting permanent pipe monuments (three -fourths inch galvanized steel pipe two feet long approximately six inches below finished grade) at each boundary of all lot corners within a subdivision, along the exterior boundary lines at intervals of approximately five hundred feet and at all beginning of cur ves and ending of curves on property lines, and monument boxes at intersection s of all street monument line tangents.

21. Demolition: Prior to recording of the Final Map the applican t shall obtain a demolition permit and remove any nonconforming structures.

22. Soils Report: Upon submittal of the Final Map, applicant shall provide a soils report prepared by a registered geotechnical or civil engineer.

23. Grading and Drainage Plan: Prior to recordation of the Final Map, the applicant shall conduct hydrology studies based on a ten -year storm frequency, prepare an engineered grading and dr ainage plan, and pay fees required to obtain necessary grading permits. Prior to occupancy, the design eng ineer shall provide written certification that the development has been built per the engineered grading and drainage plans.

6.a
Packet Pg. 196
Attachment: Resolution (PLN-2022-13 ~ 1429 & 1445 Westmont Avenue) Exhibit A - Conditions of Approval Page 6 of 3 PLN-2022-13 ~ 1429 & 1445 Westmont Ave – Major Planned Development Permit Modification & Extension of Approval
In addition, a plan revie w letter will be required of the Geotechnical engineer for the entire grading and drainage system which sh ould include but is not limited to a review of the subsurface of the non -compacted biotreatment material that may have potential for subsurface failure and surface failure due to vehicle loads.

24. Storm Drain Area Fee: Prior to recordation of the Final Map, the applicant shall pay the required Storm Drain Area fee, currently set at $2,120.00 per net acre, which is $2661.00.

25. NOI – Notice of Intent: NPDES General Construction Permit: Prior to issuance of any grading or building permits, the applicant shall com ply with the NPDES General Construction Permit requirements including paying fees, filing a Notice of Intent and providing a Storm Water Pollut ion Prevention Plan (SWPPP). The applicant shall provide the City with a copy of the filed Notice of Intent and S WPPP. This applies to all projects which disturb a land area of one acre or m ore. Disturbance includes grading, filling, grubbing, clearing, vegetation removal, building, demolition etc.

26. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Measures : Prior to issuance of any g rading or building permits, the applicant shall comply with the National Poll ution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit requirements, Sa nta Clara Valley Water District requirements, and the Campbell Municipal Code regarding stormwater pollution prevention. Specifically the project must include source control, site design and treatment measures to achieve compliance with Provision C.3. of t he NPDES Permit. Measures may include, but are not limited to, minimization of impervious surface area, vegetated swales, infiltration areas, and treatment devices. The primary objectives a re to improve the quality and reduce the quantity of stormwater runoff to the bay.

Resources to achieve these objectives include Stormwater Best Management Practices Handbook fo r New Development and Redevelopment (“CA BMP Handbook”) by the California Sto rmwater Quality Association (CASQA), 2003; Start at the Source: A Design Guidance Manual for Stormwater Quality Protection (“Start at the Source”) by the Bay Area Stormwater Man agement Agencies Association (BASMAA), 1999; and Using Site Design Techniques to Meet Development Standards for Stormwater Quality: A Companio n Document to Start at the Source (“Using Site Design Techniques”) by BASMAA, 2003.

Upon submission of the tenta tive Final Map and preliminary grading plans, the applicant shall calculate a nd submit to the City the amount of impervious surface created by the development including the types of stormwater controls to be used.

The applicant shall submit preliminary siz ing and design showing stormwater controls meet the City’s requirements.

Prior to issuance of any grading or building permits and recordation of the Final Map:
a. The applicant’s designer or engineer shall submit the required certification indicating that sizing, selection, and design of treatment BMP’s for the project

6.a
Packet Pg. 197
Attachment: Resolution (PLN-2022-13 ~ 1429 & 1445 Westmont Avenue) Exhibit A - Conditions of Approval Page 7 of 3 PLN-2022-13 ~ 1429 & 1445 Westmont Ave – Major Planned Development Permit Modification & Extension of Approval
site has been completed to meet the requirements of the City of Campbell’s NPDES permit, No. 01-119, Provision C.3.
b. The applicant shall sign the “Covenants for the Operation and Maintenance of Stormwater Facilities” and submit a Stormwater Management Plan.

Prior to occupancy:
a. A qualified BMP certifier is required to inspect the stormwater management facilities, submit a complete set of as-built drawings to Public Works Engineering, and certify on these drawings that:

1. The stormwater management facilities were constructed in compliance with the approved plans.

2. The as-built drawings show all pertinent constructed dimensions, elevations, shapes, and materials.

3. All variations in construction from the approved design plan have been identified, including omissions to and additions from the approved plan.

4. Any changes are in conformance with local, state, or federal regulations.

27. Utilities: All on-site utilities shall be installed und erground per Section 21.18.140 of the Campbell Municipal Code for any new or remodeled bu ildings or additions.

Applicant shall comply with all plan submittals, permitting, and fee requirements of the serving utility companies.

Utility locations shall not c ause damage to any existing street trees. Where there are utility conflicts due to established tree roots or where a new tree will be installed, alternate locations for utilities shall be explored. Include utility trench details where necessary.

28. Undergrounding Street Frontage Utilities: All overhead utility lines along the project’s publi c street frontages shall be installed underground per Section

21.18.140 of the Campbell Municipal Code. Applicant shall comply with all utility applications, plan subm ittals, permitting, and fee requirements of the serving utility companies.

29. Water Meter(s) and Sewer Cleanout(s): Existing and proposed water meter(s) and sewer cleanout(s) shall be relocated or installed on private property behind the public right-of-way line.

30. Utility Coordination Plan: Prior to issuance of building permits for the site, the applicant shall submit a utility coordination plan and schedule for approval by the City Engineer for installation and/or abandonment of all utilities. The plan sha ll clearly show the location and s ize of all existing utilities and the assoc iated main lines; indicate which utilities and services are to remain; which utilities and services are to be abandoned, and where new utilities and services will be installed. Jo int trenches for new utilities shall be used whenever possible.

31. Pavement Restoration: The applicant shall restore the pavement in compliance with City standard requirements. In the event that the roadway has recently received a

6.a
Packet Pg. 198
Attachment: Resolution (PLN-2022-13 ~ 1429 & 1445 Westmont Avenue) Exhibit A - Conditions of Approval Page 8 of 3 PLN-2022-13 ~ 1429 & 1445 Westmont Ave – Major Planned Development Permit Modification & Extension of Approval
pavement treatment or reco nstruction, the project will be su bject to the City’s Street Cut Moratorium. The applicant will be required to perform enhanced pavement restoration consistent with the restoration requirements associated with the Street Cut Moratorium. The City’s Paveme nt Maintenance Program website (https://www.ci.campbell.ca.us/219) has detailed information on the streets currently under moratorium and the enhanced restoration requirements.

32. Street Improvement Agreements / Plans / Encroachment Permit / Fees / Deposits:

Prior to recordation of the Final Map, the applicant shall execute a street improvement agreement, cause plans for public street improvements to be prepared by a registered civil engineer, pay va rious fees and deposits, post security and provide insurance necessary to obtain an encr oachment permit for construction of the standard public street improvements, as required by the City Engineer. The plans shall include the following, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer:
a. Show location of all existing utilities within the new an d existing public right of way.
b. Relocation of all existing utilities including utility boxes, covers, poles, etc. outside of sidewalk area. No utility boxes, covers, et c. will be allowed in the sidewalk area.
c. Removal of existing driveway approaches and nec essary sidewalk, curb and gutter.
d. Removal and replacement of any damaged sidewalk, curb and gutter, street trees shall be at the discretion of the Public Works Inspector prior all public works final sign off.
e. Removal of existing street section to centerline, as required by the City Engineer. f. Installation of City approved street trees and irrigation at 30 feet on center. g. Installation of City standard curb, gutter, park st rip, sidewalk and ADA compliant multi-family driveway approach along the entire frontage of Westmont Avenue.

Public improvements shall conform to the recent project development for 1411 and 1421 Westmont Avenue per Encroachment Permit No. 2014-00053. h. Installation of no mow ( fine fescue and hair grass Deschampsia ) turf in the park strip.
i. Installation of engineered structural pavement section to centerline, as required by the City Engineer.
j. Installation of asphalt concrete overlay per street pavement restorat ion plan fo r utility installation and/or abandonment, as required by the City Engineer. See requirements on City’s Street Cut Moratorium.
k. Installation of one Caltrans Type 15 LED -streetlight at the most westerly boundary, including conduits, conductors and related facilities in accordance with the City of Campbell’s Street Lighting Policies.
l. Installation of traffic control, stripes and signs.

6.a
Packet Pg. 199
Attachment: Resolution (PLN-2022-13 ~ 1429 & 1445 Westmont Avenue) Exhibit A - Conditions of Approval Page 9 of 3 PLN-2022-13 ~ 1429 & 1445 Westmont Ave – Major Planned Development Permit Modification & Extension of Approval
m. Construction of conforms to existing public and private improvements, as necessary.
n. Submit final plans in a digital format acceptable to the City.

33. Street Improvements Completed for Occupancy and Building Permit Final: Prior to allowing occupancy and/or final building permit signoff for any and/or all buildings, the applicant shall have the required street improvements and pavement restoration installed and accepted by the City, and the design engineer sh all submit as -built drawings to the City.

34. Maintenance of Landscaping: Owner(s), current and future, are required to maintain the landscaped park strip and tree wells i n the public right of way. This includes, but is not limited to: trees, lawn, plantings, irrigation, etc. Trees shall not be pruned in a manner that would not allow the tree to grow to a mature height.

35. Utility Encroachment Permit: Separate encroachment permits for th e installation of utilities to serve the development will be required (includ ing water, sewer, gas, electric, etc.). Applicant shall apply for and pay all necessary fees for utility permits for sanitary sewer, gas, water, electric and all other utility work.

36. Additional Street Improvements: Should it be discovered after the approv al process that new utility main lines, extra utility work or other work is required to service the development, and should those facilities o r other work affect any public improvements, the City may add conditions to the development/project/permit, at the discretion of the City Engineer, to restore pavement or other public improvements to the satisfaction of the City.

6.a
Packet Pg. 200
Attachment: Resolution (PLN-2022-13 ~ 1429 & 1445 Westmont Avenue)

January 21, 2022

Mr. Stephen Rose
Senior Planner
City of Campbell
70 N 1st Street
Campbell, Ca. 94008

Re: PROJECT DESCRIPTION for 1429-1445 Westmont Avenue Major P-D Permit Modification Application

Dear Mr. Rose,

Westmontave LLC has submitted the required materials for the above-referenced Major P-D Modification permit. Thank you for your help and guidance that I requested while assembling the application.

Under the previous approvals (Ordinance No. 2247, Resolutions 12461, 12462, 12463 and 12464,) a six lot, single family home subdivision on an approximate 1.25 AC site located on the north side of Westmont Avenue, between Harriet Avenue and Jasmine Court was approved with access via a new private roadway.

After purchasing this project in the summer of 2021, our team realized that the floor plans – and the second floors – were not marketable. The bedrooms are too small and/or narrow and our team does not believe that the current approved plans or the exterior architecture will appeal to buyers. In addition, we believe that Junior ADUs are an important amenity to buyers to facilitate multi-generational living and to improve the affordability for those who may choose to rent their ADU. Accordingly, we undertook the process to revise the floor plans within the same previously-approved lot lines and subdivision layout and to incorporate two JADUs on Lots 2 and 3. All attempts were made to respect the setbacks and comply with the standards contained within the San Tomas Area Neighborhood Plan (“STANP"). Revised civil engineering and landscape plans to accommodate the revised footprint are included in the Project Plans folder. These changes are also minor in nature and accommodate the revised footprints.

The table below highlights show the differences from the previously approved footprints. First floor and second story changes are minor as are the garage and floor area ratios.

6.b
Packet Pg. 201
Attachment: Project Description (PLN-2022-13 ~ 1429 & 1445 Westmont Avenue)

Lot No. 1 2 3 4 5 6
Lot Size 0 0 0 0 0 0
Previously Approved Building
(SF) 3,050 2,925 2,925 2,950 2,950 4,429
Change in First Floor Area 152 -596 -596 -191 -191 95
Change in Second Floor Area -209 543 543 200 263 172
Change in Garage -16 17 17 -4 -4 -187
Newly Proposed Building (SF) 3,123 2,889 2,889 2,955 2,955 4,439 Total Change in Building (SF) 73 -36 -36 5 5 10
Approved FAR 44.10% 44.82% 44.82% 44.91% 44.91% 44.71%
Proposed FAR 45.20% 44.30% 44.30% 44.96% 44.96% 44.80%
Difference from Approved Floor
Area Ratio 1.10% -0.52% -0.52% 0.05% 0.05% 0.09%

The colored elevations below show the difference between the prior approved architecture and what is being proposed. As mentioned, we believe these plans are more attractive, create better living space, are more marketable, and are consistent with STANP’s policies. In the revised plans, we have also included the summary table from the prior approval and a new summary table in the Project Description in Attachment 1. Attachment 2 to this project description are colored elevations of the fronts of the homes from the prior approval and what we are proposing.

As discussed, we have included the prior environmental and other studies from the original Tmap, PD zoning and PD permit applications for your reference.

I look forward to your review and comments. Thank you for your consideration.

Sincerely,

Kelly Erardi
Project Manager

6.b
Packet Pg. 202
Attachment: Project Description (PLN-2022-13 ~ 1429 & 1445 Westmont Avenue)

Previous PD Submittal
(by AJS Architecture)
PD Amendment Submittal
(by TDDG LLC)
ATTACHMENT 1

6.b
Packet Pg. 203
Attachment: Project Description (PLN-2022-13 ~ 1429 & 1445 Westmont Avenue) ATTACHMENT 2

6.b
Packet Pg. 204
Attachment: Project Description (PLN-2022-13 ~ 1429 & 1445 Westmont Avenue) 12 5
12 5
12 5
12 5
12 5
12 5
12 2
12 5
12 5
12 5
12 5
12 5
12 2.5

BALCONY
12 5
12 5
12 4
12 4
12 4
12 4
12 4
12 4
12 4
12 4
12 4
12 9
12 9
12 4
12 4
12 4
12 9
12 9
12 9
12 9
12 4
12 4
12 9
12 9
12 6
12 6
12 6
12 3
12 4
12 4
12 6
12 3
12 4
12 4
12 4
12 4
12 4
12 4
12 4
12 3
12 9
12 4
12 4
12 9
12 9
12 9
12 9
12 9
12 9
12 9
12 9
12 9
12 9
12 4
12 4
12 4
12 4
12 9
12 3
12 3
12 9
12 9
12 9
12 3

BALCONY
12 5
12 5
12 5
12 5
12 5
12 5
12 5
12 5
12 5
12 5
12 2
12 5
12 5
12 5
12 5
12 5
12 5
12 5
18'-0"
6'-0"
22'-5"
24'-5"
11'-0"
31'-6"
25'-0" DRIVEWAY DRIVEWAY
18'-0"
9'-8"
25'-0"
9'-4"
11'-10"
25'-11"
37'-11"
20'-3"
40'-9"
13'-9"
26'-3"
11'-8"
32'-6"
49'-6"
8'-3"
17'-3"
16'-0"
18'-0"

DRIVEWAY
19'-11"
LOT 4
PLAN C
LOT 5

PLAN C REVERSE
D.S.

D.S.

D.S.

D.S.

D.S.

D.S.

PRIVATE OPEN SPACE
2,534 SF

PRIVATE OPEN SPACE
2,534 SF

PRIVATE OPEN SPACE
1,408 SF

PRIVATE OPEN SPACE
2,610 SF

PRIVATE OPEN SPACE
3,744 SF

DRIVEWAY

DRIVEWAY

FRONT YARD
3,345 SF

WALKWAY

FRONT YARD
1,957 SF
10'-6"
30'-6"
6'-6"
6'-0"

PRIVATE OPEN SPACE
2,610 SF

FRONT YARD
2,043 SF

WALKWAY
28'-5"
30'-6"
LOT 1 LOT 2
PLAN B

FRONT YARD
2,078 SF
LOT 6
PLAN A
PLAN D
13'-2"
28'-6"
9'-8"
9'-4"
11'-10"
13'-2"
28'-6"
18'-0"

DRIVEWAY
LOT 3
PLAN B 27'-0"
18'-0"

DRIVEWAY
10'-6"
6'-6"
6'-0"
4'-0"
27'-0"
21'-10"
20'-0"
24'-5"
26'-5"
28'-5"
25'-11"
37'-11"

WALKWAY WALKWAY
25'-0"FRONT YARD
1,781 SF

FRONT YARD
1,781 SF
12'-10"
66'-0" 9'-0" 66'-0" 9'-0" 66'-0" 9'-0" 66'-0"
9'-0"
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

SECOND-STORY

WINDOWS

SECOND-STORY

WINDOWS

SECOND-STORY

WINDOWS

SECOND-STORY

WINDOWS

SECOND-STORY

WINDOWS
12 5
12 5
12 5
12 5
12 5
12 5
12 2
12 5
12 5
12 5
12 5
12 5
12 5
12 5
12 5
12 5
12 5
12 5
12 5

SECOND-STORY

WINDOWS

EXISTING GROUND
LINE

21.2092
19'-11"
4'-0"

WALKWAY
FRONT
REAR
SIDE
REAR

FRONT FRONT
SIDE
FRONT

REAR REAR REAR

FRONT FRONT

STREET SIDE
A.C
SIDE
SIDE
SIDE
SIDE
A.C
A.C
A.C A.C
A.C
REAR
TRASH
TRASH
TRASH
TRASH
TRASH
TRASH
R42'-0"

FIRE LANE
29'-10"

GUEST PARKING
1 GUEST PARKING GUEST PARKING GUEST PARKING
A.1

SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN
SCALE: 1/16"=1'-0"
N
TRUE
NORTH

PROJECT DATALAND SUBDIVISION &
1429 & 1445 WESTMONT AVE, CAMPBELL, CA

NEW SINGLE FAMILY HOUSES
· DEMOLITION OF EXISTING STRUCTURES ON THE TWO LOTS.
· SUBDIVIDE 1429 & 1445 WESTMONT AVE INTO SIX LOTS.
· CONSTRUCT SIX SINGLE FAMILY HOUSES TO FIT THE NEIGHBORHOOD.

PROJECT SUMMARY

DRAWING INDEX
A.1 SITE PLAN
A.2 SITE PHOTOS
A.3 SITE STREETSCAPE
AA.4 (LOT1) PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN (LOT1)
AA.FAR (LOT1) FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS (LOT1)
AA.5.1 (LOT1) PROPOSED ELEVATIONS (LOT1)
AA.5.2 (LOT1) PROPOSED ELEVATIONS (LOT1)
AA.5.3 (LOT1) COLORED ELEVATION (LOT1)
AA.5.4 (LOT1) COLORED ELEVATION (LOT1)
AA.6 (LOT1) PROPOSED ROOF PLAN (LOT1)
AB.4 (LOT2) PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN (LOT 2)
AB.FAR (LOT2) FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS (LOT 2)
AB.5.1 (LOT2) PROPOSED ELEVATIONS (LOT 2)
AB.5.2 (LOT2) PROPOSED ELEVATIONS (LOT 2)
AB.5.3 (LOT2) COLORED ELEVATION (LOT 2)
AB.6 (LOT2) PROPOSED ROOF PLAN (LOT 2)
AB.4 (LOT3) PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN (LOT 3)
AB.FAR (LOT3) FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS (LOT 3)
AD.FAR.1 (LOT6) FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS (LOT6)
AD.FAR.2 (LOT6) FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS (LOT6)
AD.5.1 (LOT6) PROPOSED ELEVATIONS (LOT6)
AD.5.2 (LOT6) PROPOSED ELEVATIONS (LOT6)
AD.5.3 (LOT6) COLORED ELEVATION (LOT6)
AD.6 (LOT6) PROPOSED ROOF PLAN (LOT6)
A.7 BEDROOM PRIVACY EXHIBIT

CIVIL PLAN
C1 PROPOSED SITE & SUBDIVISION PLAN, NOTES & TYPICAL DETAILS C2 EXISTING CONDITION MAP & PRELIMINARY DEMOLITION PLAN C3 & C4 PRELIMINARY GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN
C5 PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN
C6 PRELIMINARY STORM WATER CONTROL PLAN

OPEN SPACE EXHIBIT

ACCESSIBILITY PLAN

LANDSCAPING PLAN
L-1.0 LANDSCAPE PLANTING PLAN
L-1.1 EXISTING TREE SURVEY
L-1.2 PLANT PALETTE
L-2.0 LANDSCAPE IRRIGATION PLAN
L-2.1 WELO CALCULATIONS
L-3.0 LANDSCAPE NOTES AND DETAILS

PHOTOMETRIC PLAN
AB.5.1 (LOT3) PROPOSED ELEVATIONS (LOT 3)
AB.5.2 (LOT3) PROPOSED ELEVATIONS (LOT 3)
AB.5.3 (LOT3) COLORED ELEVATION (LOT3)
AB.6 (LOT3) PROPOSED ROOF PLAN (LOT 3)
AC.4 (LOT4) PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN (LOT4)
AC.FAR (LOT4) FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS (LOT4)
AC.5.1 (LOT4) PROPOSED ELEVATIONS (LOT4)
AC.5.2 (LOT4) PROPOSED ELEVATIONS (LOT4)
AC.5.3 (LOT4) COLORED ELEVATION (LOT4)
AC.6 (LOT4) PROPOSED ROOF PLAN (LOT4)
AC.4 (LOT5) PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN (LOT5)
AC.FAR (LOT5) FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS (LOT5)
AC.5.1 (LOT5) PROPOSED ELEVATIONS (LOT5)
AC.5.2 (LOT5) PROPOSED ELEVATIONS (LOT5)
AC.5.3 (LOT5) COLORED ELEVATION (LOT5)
AC.6 (LOT5) PROPOSED ROOF PLAN (LOT5)
AD.4.1 (LOT6) PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN (LOT6)
AD.4.2 (LOT6) PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN (LOT6)
DESIGNER:
97 BOSTON AVE
TEL: (650) 483-9454
SAN JOSE, CA 95128

TDDG LLC
[email protected]

DE NGUYEN
PROPERTY OWNER:
97 BOSTON AVE
[email protected]

WESTMONTAVE LLC &CHUN YI
TEL: (858) 617-9540
SAN JOSE, CA 95128

CAMPBELL, CA

LOT SUBDIVISION & SIX
1429 & 1445 WESTMONT AVE

THE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT GROUP EXPRESSLY

RESERVES ITS COMMON ITS COMMON LAW COPYRIGHT AND
OTHER PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THESE PLANS. THESE PLANS

ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED, CHANGED, OR COPIED IN

ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER, NOR ARE THEY TO BE

ASSIGNED TO A THIRD PARTY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING
THE WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENT OF TDDG, INC. IN

THE EVENT OF UNAUTHORIZED REUSE OF THESE PLANS BY A

THIRD PARTY, THE THIRD PARTY SHALL HOLD THE DESIGN
AND DEVELOPMENT GROUP HARMLESS.
97 BOSTON AVE
S A N J O S E, C A 9 5 1 2 8
T 6 5 0 . 4 8 3 . 9 4 5 4
www.tddgus.com

THE DESIGN &

DEVELOPMENT GROUP
PROJECT DESIGNER:

DE NGUYEN
PD MODIFICATION COMMENTS03/15/22

NEW SINGLE FAMILY HOUSES
PD MODIFICATION COMMENTS05/25/22
1 1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1
11 1 1 1 1
1 1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
2 6.c
Packet Pg. 205
Attachment: Project_Plans (PLN-2022-13 ~ 1429 & 1445 Westmont Avenue) A.2

CAMPBELL, CA

LOT SUBDIVISION & SIX
1429 & 1445 WESTMONT AVE

THE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT GROUP EXPRESSLY

RESERVES ITS COMMON ITS COMMON LAW COPYRIGHT AND
OTHER PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THESE PLANS. THESE PLANS

ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED, CHANGED, OR COPIED IN

ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER, NOR ARE THEY TO BE

ASSIGNED TO A THIRD PARTY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING
THE WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENT OF TDDG, INC. IN

THE EVENT OF UNAUTHORIZED REUSE OF THESE PLANS BY A

THIRD PARTY, THE THIRD PARTY SHALL HOLD THE DESIGN
AND DEVELOPMENT GROUP HARMLESS.
97 BOSTON AVE
S A N J O S E, C A 9 5 1 2 8
T 6 5 0 . 4 8 3 . 9 4 5 4
www.tddgus.com

THE DESIGN &

DEVELOPMENT GROUP
PROJECT DESIGNER:

DE NGUYEN
PD MODIFICATION COMMENTS03/15/22

NEW SINGLE FAMILY HOUSES
PD MODIFICATION COMMENTS05/25/22

SITE PHOTOS

PROJECT SITE

WESTMONT AVENUE

WESTMONT AVENUE

6.c
Packet Pg. 206
Attachment: Project_Plans (PLN-2022-13 ~ 1429 & 1445 Westmont Avenue) 8'-8" FIRST FL. WALL HT.
28' ABV. EXTG GROUND LINE
(HEIGHT LIMIT)
20'-0"
24'-6"
6'-0"
11'-0"
9'-4"
13'-2"
9'-8" 9'-8"9'-4"
11'-10" 13'-2"
6'-0"
10'-6"
6'-6"
26'-6"
6'-6" 6'-0"
10'-6"26'-6"
8'-4"
17'-4"
28' ABV. EXTG GROUND LINE
(HEIGHT LIMIT)
28' ABV. EXTG GROUND LINE
(HEIGHT LIMIT)

EXISTING GROUND LINE

TOP PLATE
10'-0"
PAD +230.50'

FINISH FLOOR
9'-0"8"

TOP PLATE
2nd FINISH FLOOR

TOP PLATE
9'-0"
PAD +230.00'

FINISH FLOOR
9'-0"8"

TOP PLATE
2nd FINISH FLOOR

TOP PLATE
9'-0"
PAD +230.00'

FINISH FLOOR
9'-0"8"

TOP PLATE
2nd FINISH FLOOR

TOP PLATE
10'-0"
PAD +230.50'

FINISH FLOOR
9'-0"8"

TOP PLATE
2nd FINISH FLOOR

TOP PLATE
9'-0"
PAD +230.00'

FINISH FLOOR
9'-0"8"

TOP PLATE
2nd FINISH FLOOR
17'-5"
19'-5"
LOT 1 LOT 2 LOT 3 LOT 4 LOT 5 LOT 6
65'-0" 62'-0" 62'-0" 66'-0" 66'-0" 73'-9"
11'-10"

TOP PLATE
10'-0"
PAD +230.50'

FINISH FLOOR
9'-0"8"
2nd FINISH FLOOR
123
12 4
129
12'-4" FIRST FL. WALL HT.
22'-5" SECOND FL. WALL HT.
129
125
125
XX
28' ABV. EXTG GROUND LINE
(HEIGHT LIMIT)
28' ABV. EXTG GROUND LINE
(HEIGHT LIMIT) 28' ABV. EXTG GROUND LINE
(HEIGHT LIMIT)
2'-9"
2'-6"
2'-9"
2'-6"
1'-6"
1'-11"
10"
1'-4"
1'-1"
1'-2"
1'-10"
1'-8"
12 2.5
STUCCO, TYP.
12 5
21'-10" SECOND FL. WALL HT.
20'-8" SECOND FL. WALL HT.
10'-1" FIRST FL. WALL HT.

XX
12 9
XX
22'-8" SECOND FL. WALL HT.
10'-8" FINISH FLOOR HEGHT 3'-0"
XX
9 12
9 12
12'-4" FIRST FL. WALL HT.
21'-10" SECOND FL. WALL HT.
25'-6" MAX. STRUCTURE HEIGHT
10'-8" FINISH FLOOR HEGHT 3'-0"
12 5
12 5
XX
21'-6" SECOND FL. WALL HT.

A.3

CAMPBELL, CA

LOT SUBDIVISION & SIX
1429 & 1445 WESTMONT AVE

THE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT GROUP EXPRESSLY

RESERVES ITS COMMON ITS COMMON LAW COPYRIGHT AND
OTHER PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THESE PLANS. THESE PLANS

ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED, CHANGED, OR COPIED IN

ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER, NOR ARE THEY TO BE

ASSIGNED TO A THIRD PARTY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING
THE WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENT OF TDDG, INC. IN

THE EVENT OF UNAUTHORIZED REUSE OF THESE PLANS BY A

THIRD PARTY, THE THIRD PARTY SHALL HOLD THE DESIGN
AND DEVELOPMENT GROUP HARMLESS.
97 BOSTON AVE
S A N J O S E, C A 9 5 1 2 8
T 6 5 0 . 4 8 3 . 9 4 5 4
www.tddgus.com

THE DESIGN &

DEVELOPMENT GROUP
PROJECT DESIGNER:

DE NGUYEN
PD MODIFICATION COMMENTS03/15/22

NEW SINGLE FAMILY HOUSES
PD MODIFICATION COMMENTS05/25/22

SITE STREETSCAPE
SCALE: 1/16"=1'-0"
1 6.c
Packet Pg. 207
Attachment: Project_Plans (PLN-2022-13 ~ 1429 & 1445 Westmont Avenue) UP

LIVING ROOM
BATH #3
FOYER
GARAGE
O/M
PANTRY

FAMILY ROOM

KITCHEN

OFFICE/BEDRM

DINNING ROOM
37'-0"
31'-6" 5'-6"
57'-6"
8'-0"14'-6"6'-6"
39'-0"
19'-0" 20'-0"
57'-6"
8'-6"21'-0"
REF.
14'-0" 14'-6"
28'-0"

FRONT PORCH

BUILDING LINE ABOVE

BUILDING LINE ABOVEBUILDING LINE ABOVE

BUILDING LINE ABOVE
20'-0"
19'-0"
WIC
BEDROOM #2
MASTER BEDROOM #1
MASTER
BATH#1
29'-0"
12'-6" 16'-6"
49'-0"
12'-6"14'-0"
29'-0"
12'-0" 17'-0"
16'-0"10'-0"9'-0"14'-0"
49'-0"
BEDROOM #3
BATH #2

LAUNDRY
DN
D W
8'-0"14'-6"

BUILDING LINE BELOW

BUILDING LINE BELOW

BALCONY

PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN - FIRST FLOOR (PLAN A)
SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0"

CAMPBELL, CA

LOT SUBDIVISION & SIX
1429 & 1445 WESTMONT AVE

THE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT GROUP EXPRESSLY

RESERVES ITS COMMON ITS COMMON LAW COPYRIGHT AND
OTHER PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THESE PLANS. THESE PLANS

ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED, CHANGED, OR COPIED IN

ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER, NOR ARE THEY TO BE

ASSIGNED TO A THIRD PARTY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING
THE WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENT OF TDDG, INC. IN

THE EVENT OF UNAUTHORIZED REUSE OF THESE PLANS BY A

THIRD PARTY, THE THIRD PARTY SHALL HOLD THE DESIGN
AND DEVELOPMENT GROUP HARMLESS.
97 BOSTON AVE
S A N J O S E, C A 9 5 1 2 8
T 6 5 0 . 4 8 3 . 9 4 5 4
www.tddgus.com

THE DESIGN &

DEVELOPMENT GROUP
PROJECT DESIGNER:

DE NGUYEN
PD MODIFICATION COMMENTS03/15/22

NEW SINGLE FAMILY HOUSES
PD MODIFICATION COMMENTS05/25/22
N
TRUE
NORTH

PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN - SECOND FLOOR (PLAN A)
SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0"
N
TRUE
NORTH
AA.4
(LOT 1)
1 6.c
Packet Pg. 208
Attachment: Project_Plans (PLN-2022-13 ~ 1429 & 1445 Westmont Avenue) UP

LIVING ROOM
BATH #3
FOYER
GARAGE
O/M
PANTRY

FAMILY ROOM

KITCHEN

OFFICE/BEDRM

DINNING ROOM
REF.

FRONT PORCH

BUILDING LINE ABOVE

BUILDING LINE ABOVEBUILDING LINE ABOVE

BUILDING LINE ABOVE
14'-6"
B
D
F
E
C
A
31'-6"
20'-0"19'-0"
14'-0"8'-0"14'-6" 14'-6"
21'-0"
19'-0"
28'-0"
WIC
BEDROOM #2
MASTER BEDROOM #1
MASTER
BATH#1
BEDROOM #3
BATH #2

LAUNDRY
DN
D W

BUILDING LINE BELOW

BUILDING LINE BELOW

BALCONY
12'-6" 16'-6"
14'-0"
28'-0"
J
K
I
G
H
8'-0"14'-6"
29'-0"
10'-6" 16'-0"
16'-4"
LOT AREA: 6,916 SF=
F.A.R.: 44.8%=3,102/6,916
FIRST FLOOR LIVING AREA:

A
B
C
E
456.75 SF
203.00 SF
266.00 SF
14'-6" x 14'-0"
=
=
=
28'-0" x 8'-0"D
275.50 SF=19'-0" x 14'-6"
224.00 SF=
19'-0" x 14'-0"
31'-6" x 14'-6"
TOTAL: 1,425.25 SF=
FIRST FLOOR LIVING AREA: =
SECOND FLOOR LIVING AREA: =
TOTAL LIVING AREA: 2,682 SF=
SECOND FLOOR LIVING AREA:

G 264.00 SF16'-6" x 16'-0" =
TOTAL: 1,256.75 SF=
GARAGE
F 420 SF=20'-0"x 21'-0"
TOTAL GARAGE: = LOT COVERAGE:

31.1%=2,151.49/6,916
H 175.00 SF12'-6" x 14'-0" =
I 173.25 SF16'-4" x 10'-6" =
J 224.00 SF28'-0" x 8'-0" = FIRST FLOOR LIVING AREA:

GARAGE:

PORCH:
=
420 SF=
306.24 SF=
TOTAL : 2,151.49 SF=
K 420.50 SF29'-0" x 14'-6" =
420 SF
1,425.25 SF
1,256.75 SF
1,425.25 SF
GARAGE: = 420 SF
TOTAL FLOOR AREA: 3,102 SF=
306.34 SF
PORCH
TOTAL PORCH: = 306.34 SF

FIRST FLOOR AREA DIAGRAM (PLAN A)
SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0"

CAMPBELL, CA

LOT SUBDIVISION & SIX
1429 & 1445 WESTMONT AVE

THE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT GROUP EXPRESSLY

RESERVES ITS COMMON ITS COMMON LAW COPYRIGHT AND
OTHER PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THESE PLANS. THESE PLANS

ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED, CHANGED, OR COPIED IN

ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER, NOR ARE THEY TO BE

ASSIGNED TO A THIRD PARTY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING
THE WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENT OF TDDG, INC. IN

THE EVENT OF UNAUTHORIZED REUSE OF THESE PLANS BY A

THIRD PARTY, THE THIRD PARTY SHALL HOLD THE DESIGN
AND DEVELOPMENT GROUP HARMLESS.
97 BOSTON AVE
S A N J O S E, C A 9 5 1 2 8
T 6 5 0 . 4 8 3 . 9 4 5 4
www.tddgus.com

THE DESIGN &

DEVELOPMENT GROUP
PROJECT DESIGNER:

DE NGUYEN
PD MODIFICATION COMMENTS03/15/22

NEW SINGLE FAMILY HOUSES
PD MODIFICATION COMMENTS05/25/22
N
TRUE
NORTH

SECOND FLOOR AREA DIAGRAM (PLAN A)
SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0"
N
TRUE
NORTH
AA.FAR
(LOT 1)
1 6.c
Packet Pg. 209
Attachment: Project_Plans (PLN-2022-13 ~ 1429 & 1445 Westmont Avenue)

COMPOSITION

SHINGLE ROOF
MINIMUM CLASS "C"
OVER 30# FELT
12 2.5
STUCCO, TYP.
12 5

WOOD SIDING,
6" EXPOSURE TYP.

TOP PLATE
10'-0"
24'-6"
PROPOSED ADJACENT GRADE +230.50'

FINISH FLOOR
9'-0"8"

TOP PLATE
2nd FINISH FLOOR

TOP OF RIDGE
3'-10"

AVERAGE NATURAL GRADE AT

HOUSE FOORPRINT
+229.30'
20'-8" TOTAL WALL HT.FROM PROPOSED GARDE
28' ABV. EXTG GROUND LINE
(HEIGHT LIMIT)
8'-8" FIRST FL. WALL HT.
21'-10" SECOND FL. WALL HT.
20'-8" SECOND FL. WALL HT.
10'-1" FIRST FL. WALL HT.

XX
10'-4" FIRST FL. WALL HT.

COMPOSITION

SHINGLE ROOF
MINIMUM CLASS "C"
OVER 30# FELT

WOOD SIDING,
6" EXPOSURE TYP.

STUCCO, TYP.

TOP PLATE
10'-0"
24'-6"
PROPOSED ADJACENT GRADE +230.50'

FINISH FLOOR
9'-0"8"

TOP PLATE
2nd FINISH FLOOR

TOP OF RIDGE
3'-10"

AVERAGE NATURAL GRADE AT

HOUSE FOORPRINT
+229.30'
20'-8" TOTAL WALL HT.FROM PROPOSED GARDE
28' ABV. EXTG GROUND LINE
(HEIGHT LIMIT)
12'-11" FIRST FL. WALL HT.
20'-8" SECOND FL. WALL HT.
8'-8" FIRST FL. WALL HT.

CAMPBELL, CA

LOT SUBDIVISION & SIX
1429 & 1445 WESTMONT AVE

THE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT GROUP EXPRESSLY

RESERVES ITS COMMON ITS COMMON LAW COPYRIGHT AND
OTHER PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THESE PLANS. THESE PLANS

ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED, CHANGED, OR COPIED IN

ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER, NOR ARE THEY TO BE

ASSIGNED TO A THIRD PARTY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING
THE WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENT OF TDDG, INC. IN

THE EVENT OF UNAUTHORIZED REUSE OF THESE PLANS BY A

THIRD PARTY, THE THIRD PARTY SHALL HOLD THE DESIGN
AND DEVELOPMENT GROUP HARMLESS.
97 BOSTON AVE
S A N J O S E, C A 9 5 1 2 8
T 6 5 0 . 4 8 3 . 9 4 5 4
www.tddgus.com

THE DESIGN &

DEVELOPMENT GROUP
PROJECT DESIGNER:

DE NGUYEN
PD MODIFICATION COMMENTS03/15/22

NEW SINGLE FAMILY HOUSES
PD MODIFICATION COMMENTS05/25/22

PROPOSED RIGHT ELEVATION (PLAN A)
SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0"

PROPOSED FRONT ELEVATION (PLAN A)
SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0"
AA.5.1
(LOT 1)

6.c
Packet Pg. 210
Attachment: Project_Plans (PLN-2022-13 ~ 1429 & 1445 Westmont Avenue)

COMPOSITION

SHINGLE ROOF
MINIMUM CLASS "C"
OVER 30# FELT
12 5 12 5

STANDING

METAL SEAM
ROOF
STUCCO, TYP.

WOOD SIDING,
6" EXPOSURE TYP.
21'-7" SECOND FL. WALL HT.

TOP PLATE
10'-0"
24'-6"
PROPOSED ADJACENT GRADE +230.50'

FINISH FLOOR
9'-0"8"

TOP PLATE
2nd FINISH FLOOR

TOP OF RIDGE
3'-10"

AVERAGE NATURAL GRADE AT

HOUSE FOORPRINT
+229.30'
20'-8" TOTAL WALL HT.FROM PROPOSED GARDE
28' ABV. EXTG GROUND LINE
(HEIGHT LIMIT)
8'-8" FIRST FL. WALL HT.
20'-8" SECOND FL. WALL HT.
10'-4" FIRST FL. WALL HT.

JAMES HARDIE PANEL

FIBER CEMENT SMOOTH
SIDING.

JAMES HARDIE FIBER

CEMENT TRIM

COMPOSITION

SHINGLE ROOF
MINIMUM CLASS "C"
OVER 30# FELT
122.5
STUCCO, TYP.
12 5

TOP PLATE
10'-0"
24'-6"
PROPOSED ADJACENT GRADE +230.50'

FINISH FLOOR
9'-0"8"

TOP PLATE
2nd FINISH FLOOR

TOP OF RIDGE
3'-10"

AVERAGE NATURAL GRADE AT

HOUSE FOORPRINT
+229.30'
20'-8" TOTAL WALL HT.FROM PROPOSED GARDE
28' ABV. EXTG GROUND LINE
(HEIGHT LIMIT)
21'-10" SECOND FL. WALL HT.
10'-4" FIRST FL. WALL HT.
20'-8" SECOND FL. WALL HT.

CAMPBELL, CA

LOT SUBDIVISION & SIX
1429 & 1445 WESTMONT AVE

THE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT GROUP EXPRESSLY

RESERVES ITS COMMON ITS COMMON LAW COPYRIGHT AND
OTHER PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THESE PLANS. THESE PLANS

ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED, CHANGED, OR COPIED IN

ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER, NOR ARE THEY TO BE

ASSIGNED TO A THIRD PARTY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING
THE WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENT OF TDDG, INC. IN

THE EVENT OF UNAUTHORIZED REUSE OF THESE PLANS BY A

THIRD PARTY, THE THIRD PARTY SHALL HOLD THE DESIGN
AND DEVELOPMENT GROUP HARMLESS.
97 BOSTON AVE
S A N J O S E, C A 9 5 1 2 8
T 6 5 0 . 4 8 3 . 9 4 5 4
www.tddgus.com

THE DESIGN &

DEVELOPMENT GROUP
PROJECT DESIGNER:

DE NGUYEN
PD MODIFICATION COMMENTS03/15/22

NEW SINGLE FAMILY HOUSES
PD MODIFICATION COMMENTS05/25/22

PROPOSED LEFT ELEVATION (PLAN A)
SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0"

PROPOSED REAR ELEVATION (PLAN A)
SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0"
AA.5.2
(LOT 1)

6.c
Packet Pg. 211
Attachment: Project_Plans (PLN-2022-13 ~ 1429 & 1445 Westmont Avenue)

CAMPBELL, CA

LOT SUBDIVISION & SIX
1429 & 1445 WESTMONT AVE

THE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT GROUP EXPRESSLY

RESERVES ITS COMMON ITS COMMON LAW COPYRIGHT AND
OTHER PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THESE PLANS. THESE PLANS

ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED, CHANGED, OR COPIED IN

ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER, NOR ARE THEY TO BE

ASSIGNED TO A THIRD PARTY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING
THE WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENT OF TDDG, INC. IN

THE EVENT OF UNAUTHORIZED REUSE OF THESE PLANS BY A

THIRD PARTY, THE THIRD PARTY SHALL HOLD THE DESIGN
AND DEVELOPMENT GROUP HARMLESS.
97 BOSTON AVE
S A N J O S E, C A 9 5 1 2 8
T 6 5 0 . 4 8 3 . 9 4 5 4
www.tddgus.com

THE DESIGN &

DEVELOPMENT GROUP
PROJECT DESIGNER:

DE NGUYEN
PD MODIFICATION COMMENTS03/15/22

NEW SINGLE FAMILY HOUSES
PD MODIFICATION COMMENTS05/25/22
AA.5.3
(LOT 1)
COLORED ELEVATION - LOT 1

1. CERTAINTEED ROOFING

PRESIDENTIAL TL

CHARCOAL BLACK

2. PAINTED SURFACE
KM4968 ARCTIC
WHITE

3. HORIZONTAL WALL SIDINGS

KELLY MOORE
KM4968 ARCTIC WHITE

4. VERTICAL WALL SIDINGS

KELLY MOORE
KM4968 ARCTIC WHITE

5. SMOOTH WHITE
STUCCO
1 4
3 2
2 2
4 5

6. TRIMS/BORDERS

KELLY MOORE
KM4883 BLACK CAT
1 6.c
Packet Pg. 212
Attachment: Project_Plans (PLN-2022-13 ~ 1429 & 1445 Westmont Avenue)

CAMPBELL, CA

LOT SUBDIVISION & SIX
1429 & 1445 WESTMONT AVE

THE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT GROUP EXPRESSLY

RESERVES ITS COMMON ITS COMMON LAW COPYRIGHT AND
OTHER PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THESE PLANS. THESE PLANS

ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED, CHANGED, OR COPIED IN

ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER, NOR ARE THEY TO BE

ASSIGNED TO A THIRD PARTY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING
THE WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENT OF TDDG, INC. IN

THE EVENT OF UNAUTHORIZED REUSE OF THESE PLANS BY A

THIRD PARTY, THE THIRD PARTY SHALL HOLD THE DESIGN
AND DEVELOPMENT GROUP HARMLESS.
97 BOSTON AVE
S A N J O S E, C A 9 5 1 2 8
T 6 5 0 . 4 8 3 . 9 4 5 4
www.tddgus.com

THE DESIGN &

DEVELOPMENT GROUP
PROJECT DESIGNER:

DE NGUYEN
PD MODIFICATION COMMENTS03/15/22

NEW SINGLE FAMILY HOUSES
PD MODIFICATION COMMENTS05/25/22
AA.5.4
(LOT 1)
COLORED ELEVATION - LOT 1

1. CERTAINTEED ROOFING

PRESIDENTIAL TL

CHARCOAL BLACK

3. PAINTED SURFACE
KM4968 ARCTIC
WHITE

4. HORIZONTAL WALL SIDINGS

KELLY MOORE
KM4968 ARCTIC WHITE

5. VERTICAL WALL SIDINGS

KELLY MOORE
KM4968 ARCTIC WHITE

6. SMOOTH WHITE
STUCCO
1 5
4 3
6 3
3 6

7. FRAMES/BORDERS

KELLY MOORE
KM4883 BLACK CAT
2 2. STANDING SEAM

METAL ROOF

MATTE-BLACK
2 3
1 6
7 6.c
Packet Pg. 213
Attachment: Project_Plans (PLN-2022-13 ~ 1429 & 1445 Westmont Avenue) 12 5
12 5
12 5
12 5
12 5
12 5
12 2
12 5
12 5
12 5
12 5
12 5
12 2.5

BALCONY
12 5
12 5

CAMPBELL, CA

LOT SUBDIVISION & SIX
1429 & 1445 WESTMONT AVE

THE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT GROUP EXPRESSLY

RESERVES ITS COMMON ITS COMMON LAW COPYRIGHT AND
OTHER PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THESE PLANS. THESE PLANS

ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED, CHANGED, OR COPIED IN

ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER, NOR ARE THEY TO BE

ASSIGNED TO A THIRD PARTY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING
THE WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENT OF TDDG, INC. IN

THE EVENT OF UNAUTHORIZED REUSE OF THESE PLANS BY A

THIRD PARTY, THE THIRD PARTY SHALL HOLD THE DESIGN
AND DEVELOPMENT GROUP HARMLESS.
97 BOSTON AVE
S A N J O S E, C A 9 5 1 2 8
T 6 5 0 . 4 8 3 . 9 4 5 4
www.tddgus.com

THE DESIGN &

DEVELOPMENT GROUP
PROJECT DESIGNER:

DE NGUYEN
PD MODIFICATION COMMENTS03/15/22

NEW SINGLE FAMILY HOUSES
PD MODIFICATION COMMENTS05/25/22

PROPOSED ROOF PLAN (PLAN A)
SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0"
N
TRUE
NORTH
AA.6
(LOT 1)
1 6.c
Packet Pg. 214
Attachment: Project_Plans (PLN-2022-13 ~ 1429 & 1445 Westmont Avenue) BEDR00M #1
GARAGE
UP

FAMILY ROOM DINNING ROOM
FOYER
J. ADU BEDROOM #2

SEATING AREA
CLOSET
CLOSET
BATH 1
BATH 2
W/D
CLO.

PORCH

BUILDING LINE ABOVE
DW

KITCHEN
REF.

CLO.

REF.

PORCH
12'-6" 17'-0" 13'-6"
43'-0"
8'-0"19'-0"4'-0"2'-6"13'-0"7'-8"
54'-2"
12'-6"12'-0"8'-6"21'-0"
54'-0"
21'-0"22'-0"
43'-0"
20'-0"
20'-0"
M. BATH #3
BEDROOM #5
DW
DN
BATH #4

LAUNDRY
CLO.

BEDROOM #4
W.I.C.

M. BEDROOM #3
CLO.
19'-6" 13'-0"
17'-6" 19'-6"
15'-6"19'-6"
33'-6"
37'-0"
37'-0"
38'-6"
12'-6" 2'-6" 6'-8" 2'-5"
15'-0"6'-6"12'-0"
5'-0"
38'-6"
5'-6"12'-0" 8'-0"

BUILDING LINE BELOW
3'-6"
3'-6"4'-6"
PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN - FIRST FLOOR (PLAN B-LOT 2)
SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0"

CAMPBELL, CA

LOT SUBDIVISION & SIX
1429 & 1445 WESTMONT AVE

THE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT GROUP EXPRESSLY

RESERVES ITS COMMON ITS COMMON LAW COPYRIGHT AND
OTHER PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THESE PLANS. THESE PLANS

ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED, CHANGED, OR COPIED IN

ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER, NOR ARE THEY TO BE

ASSIGNED TO A THIRD PARTY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING
THE WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENT OF TDDG, INC. IN

THE EVENT OF UNAUTHORIZED REUSE OF THESE PLANS BY A

THIRD PARTY, THE THIRD PARTY SHALL HOLD THE DESIGN
AND DEVELOPMENT GROUP HARMLESS.
97 BOSTON AVE
S A N J O S E, C A 9 5 1 2 8
T 6 5 0 . 4 8 3 . 9 4 5 4
www.tddgus.com

THE DESIGN &

DEVELOPMENT GROUP
PROJECT DESIGNER:

DE NGUYEN
PD MODIFICATION COMMENTS03/15/22

NEW SINGLE FAMILY HOUSES
PD MODIFICATION COMMENTS05/25/22
N
TRUE
NORTH
PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN - SECOND FLOOR (PLAN B-LOT 2)
SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0"
N
TRUE
NORTH
AB.4
(LOT 2)
1 1
1 6.c
Packet Pg. 215
Attachment: Project_Plans (PLN-2022-13 ~ 1429 & 1445 Westmont Avenue) BEDR00M #1
GARAGE
UP

FAMILY ROOM DINNING ROOM
FOYER
J. ADU BEDROOM #2

SEATING AREA
CLOSET
CLOSET
BATH 1
BATH 2
W/D
CLO.

PORCH
DW

KITCHEN
REF.

CLO.

REF.

PORCH
B
A
D E
F
17'-6"
21'-0"
25'-0"
8'-0"
15'-6" 6'-6"
13'-6"
21'-0"
30'-1"
12'-6"
C
3'-6"
8'-0" 25'-0"K
L
13'-0"
9'-6"
FIRST FLOOR LIVING AREA (MAIN HOUSE):

TOTAL:

SECOND FLOOR LIVING AREA:

TOTAL:
441.00 SF
441.00 SF21'-0" x 21'-0"
FIRST FLOOR LIVING AREA: =
SECOND FLOOR LIVING AREA: =
TOTAL HATBITABLE AREA: 2,447.75 SF=
GARAGE
F =
TOTAL GARAGE: =
1,208.50 SF
1,239.25 SF
GARAGE: = 441.00 SF
MAIN HOUSE TOTAL FLOOR AREA: 2,888.75 SF=
196.00 SFPORCH
17'-6" x 8'-0"
30'-1" x 25'-0"
3'-6" x 8'-0"
15'-6" x 13'-6"
6'-6" x 12'-6"
A
B
C
D
E
19'-6" x 21'-0"
15'-6" x 19'-6"
24'-0" x 12'-6"
13'-0" x 17'-6"
G
H
I
J
=
=
=
=
409.50 SF
302.25 SF
300.00 SF
227.50 SF
=
=
=
=
=
140.00 SF
750.00 SF

28.00 SF
209.25 SF

81.25 SF
= 1,208.50 SF
= 1,239.25 SF
MAIN HOUSE:

FIRST FLOOR LIVING AREA (JADU):

TOTAL:
13'-0" x 25'-0"
9'-6" x 8'-0"
K
L
=
=
325.00 SF

76.00 SF
= 401.00 SF
JADU FLOOR AREA: 401.00 SF
TOTAL FLOOR AREA: 3,289.75 SF=
LOT AREA: 6,526 SF=
LOT COVERAGE:
=1,845.5/6,526
GARAGE:

PORCH:
=
=
=
TOTAL : = 1,845.50 SF

28.3%
1,208.50 SF
441.00 SF
196.00 SF

FIRST FLOOR LIVING AREA (MAIN HOUSE)
F.A.R.(MAIN HOUSE ONLY):

44.3%=2,889/6,526
M. BATH #3
BEDROOM #5
DW
DN
BATH #4

LAUNDRY
CLO.

BEDROOM #4
W.I.C.

M. BEDROOM #3
CLO.

G
I
J
H
24'-0" 13'-0"
17'-6" 19'-6"
12'-6" 21'-0"
19'-6" 15'-6"

CAMPBELL, CA

LOT SUBDIVISION & SIX
1429 & 1445 WESTMONT AVE

THE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT GROUP EXPRESSLY

RESERVES ITS COMMON ITS COMMON LAW COPYRIGHT AND
OTHER PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THESE PLANS. THESE PLANS

ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED, CHANGED, OR COPIED IN

ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER, NOR ARE THEY TO BE

ASSIGNED TO A THIRD PARTY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING
THE WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENT OF TDDG, INC. IN

THE EVENT OF UNAUTHORIZED REUSE OF THESE PLANS BY A

THIRD PARTY, THE THIRD PARTY SHALL HOLD THE DESIGN
AND DEVELOPMENT GROUP HARMLESS.
97 BOSTON AVE
S A N J O S E, C A 9 5 1 2 8
T 6 5 0 . 4 8 3 . 9 4 5 4
www.tddgus.com

THE DESIGN &

DEVELOPMENT GROUP
PROJECT DESIGNER:

DE NGUYEN
PD MODIFICATION COMMENTS03/15/22

NEW SINGLE FAMILY HOUSES
PD MODIFICATION COMMENTS05/25/22
AB.FAR
(LOT 2)
FIRST FLOOR AREA DIAGRAM (PLAN B-LOT 2)
SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0"
N
TRUE
NORTH
SECOND FLOOR AREA DIAGRAM (PLAN B-LOT 2)
SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0"
N
TRUE
NORTH
1 6.c
Packet Pg. 216
Attachment: Project_Plans (PLN-2022-13 ~ 1429 & 1445 Westmont Avenue)

COMPOSITION

SHINGLE ROOF
MINIMUM CLASS "C"
OVER 30# FELT

STANDING

METAL SEAM
ROOF
12 9
XX
9'-8" FIRST FL. WALL HT.
18'-8" SECOND FL. WALL HT.
20'-8" SECOND FL. WALL HT.
22'-8" SECOND FL. WALL HT.

TOP PLATE
9'-0"
26'-2"
PROPOSED ADJACENT GRADE +230.00'

FINISH FLOOR
9'-0"

TOP PLATE
2nd FINISH FLOOR

TOP OF RIDGE
6'-6"

AVERAGE NATURAL GRADE AT

HOUSE FOORPRINT
+229.10'
19'-8" TOTAL WALL HT.FROM PROPOSED GARDE
28' ABV. EXTG GROUND LINE
(HEIGHT LIMIT)
8"

TOP PLATE
9'-0"

FINISH FLOOR
10'-0"

TOP PLATE
2nd FINISH FLOOR
10'-8" FINISH FLOOR HEGHT 3'-0"
SIDING: HORIZONTAL
6" EXPOSE PAINT
GRADE
1X3 WOOD BATTENS
SPACED AT 16" O.C.

OVER SMOOTH PANEL
BOARD
STUCCO TYP.
26'-2" MAX. STRUCTURE HEIGHT

COMPOSITION

SHINGLE ROOF
MINIMUM CLASS "C"
OVER 30# FELT
12 4
12 6
12 6
12 3

COMPOSITION

SHINGLE ROOF
MINIMUM CLASS "C"
OVER 30# FELT
9'-8" FIRST FL. WALL HT.
19'-8" SECOND FL. WALL HT.
11'-1" FIRST FL. WALL HT.
20'-8" SECOND FL. WALL HT.
21'-10" SECOND FL. WALL HT.

TOP PLATE
9'-0"
26'-2"
PROPOSED ADJACENT GRADE +230.00'

FINISH FLOOR
9'-0"

TOP PLATE
2nd FINISH FLOOR

TOP OF RIDGE
6'-6"

AVERAGE NATURAL GRADE AT

HOUSE FOORPRINT
+229.10'
19'-8" TOTAL WALL HT.FROM PROPOSED GARDE
28' ABV. EXTG GROUND LINE
(HEIGHT LIMIT)
8"
1X3 WOOD BATTENS
SPACED AT 16" O.C.

OVER SMOOTH PANEL
BOARD
STUCCO TYP.
10'-8" FINISH FLOOR HEGHT
AB.5.1

CAMPBELL, CA

LOT SUBDIVISION & SIX
1429 & 1445 WESTMONT AVE

THE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT GROUP EXPRESSLY

RESERVES ITS COMMON ITS COMMON LAW COPYRIGHT AND
OTHER PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THESE PLANS. THESE PLANS

ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED, CHANGED, OR COPIED IN

ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER, NOR ARE THEY TO BE

ASSIGNED TO A THIRD PARTY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING
THE WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENT OF TDDG, INC. IN

THE EVENT OF UNAUTHORIZED REUSE OF THESE PLANS BY A

THIRD PARTY, THE THIRD PARTY SHALL HOLD THE DESIGN
AND DEVELOPMENT GROUP HARMLESS.
97 BOSTON AVE
S A N J O S E, C A 9 5 1 2 8
T 6 5 0 . 4 8 3 . 9 4 5 4
www.tddgus.com

THE DESIGN &

DEVELOPMENT GROUP
PROJECT DESIGNER:

DE NGUYEN
PD MODIFICATION COMMENTS03/15/22

NEW SINGLE FAMILY HOUSES
PD MODIFICATION COMMENTS05/25/22
PROPOSED FRONT ELEVATION (PLAN B- LOT 2)
SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0"
PROPOSED RIGHT ELEVATION (PLAN B- LOT 2)
SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0"
(LOT 2)
1 1
1 1
1 6.c
Packet Pg. 217
Attachment: Project_Plans (PLN-2022-13 ~ 1429 & 1445 Westmont Avenue)

COMPOSITION

SHINGLE ROOF
MINIMUM CLASS "C"
OVER 30# FELT

COMPOSITION

SHINGLE ROOF
MINIMUM CLASS "C"
OVER 30# FELT
12 4
12 3
12 6
9'-8" FIRST FL. WALL HT.
20'-8" SECOND FL. WALL HT.
21'-10" FIRST FL. WALL HT.
11'-1" FIRST FL. WALL HT.
9'-8" FIRST FL. WALL HT.

TOP PLATE
9'-0"
26'-2"
PROPOSED ADJACENT GRADE +230.00'

FINISH FLOOR
9'-0"

TOP PLATE
2nd FINISH FLOOR

TOP OF RIDGE
6'-6"

AVERAGE NATURAL GRADE AT

HOUSE FOORPRINT
+229.10'
19'-8" TOTAL WALL HT.FROM PROPOSED GARDE
28' ABV. EXTG GROUND LINE
(HEIGHT LIMIT)
8"
STUCCO TYP.

COMPOSITION

SHINGLE ROOF
MINIMUM CLASS "C"
OVER 30# FELT
12 6
12 4
9'-10" FIRST FL. WALL HT.
19'-8" SECOND FL. WALL HT.
11'-11" FIRST FL. WALL HT.
21'-9" SECOND FL. WALL HT.
20'-8" SECOND FL. WALL HT.

TOP PLATE
9'-0"
26'-2"
PROPOSED ADJACENT GRADE +230.00'

FINISH FLOOR
9'-0"

TOP PLATE
2nd FINISH FLOOR

TOP OF RIDGE
6'-6"

AVERAGE NATURAL GRADE AT

HOUSE FOORPRINT
19'-8" TOTAL WALL HT.FROM PROPOSED GARDE
28' ABV. EXTG GROUND LINE
(HEIGHT LIMIT)
8"
STUCCO TYP.

CAMPBELL, CA

LOT SUBDIVISION & SIX
1429 & 1445 WESTMONT AVE

THE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT GROUP EXPRESSLY

RESERVES ITS COMMON ITS COMMON LAW COPYRIGHT AND
OTHER PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THESE PLANS. THESE PLANS

ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED, CHANGED, OR COPIED IN

ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER, NOR ARE THEY TO BE

ASSIGNED TO A THIRD PARTY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING
THE WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENT OF TDDG, INC. IN

THE EVENT OF UNAUTHORIZED REUSE OF THESE PLANS BY A

THIRD PARTY, THE THIRD PARTY SHALL HOLD THE DESIGN
AND DEVELOPMENT GROUP HARMLESS.
97 BOSTON AVE
S A N J O S E, C A 9 5 1 2 8
T 6 5 0 . 4 8 3 . 9 4 5 4
www.tddgus.com

THE DESIGN &

DEVELOPMENT GROUP
PROJECT DESIGNER:

DE NGUYEN
PD MODIFICATION COMMENTS03/15/22

NEW SINGLE FAMILY HOUSES
PD MODIFICATION COMMENTS05/25/22
PROPOSED LEFT ELEVATION (PLAN B- LOT 2)
SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0"
PROPOSED REAR ELEVATION (PLAN B- LOT 2)
SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0"
AB.5.2
(LOT 2)

6.c
Packet Pg. 218
Attachment: Project_Plans (PLN-2022-13 ~ 1429 & 1445 Westmont Avenue)

CAMPBELL, CA

LOT SUBDIVISION & SIX
1429 & 1445 WESTMONT AVE

THE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT GROUP EXPRESSLY

RESERVES ITS COMMON ITS COMMON LAW COPYRIGHT AND
OTHER PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THESE PLANS. THESE PLANS

ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED, CHANGED, OR COPIED IN

ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER, NOR ARE THEY TO BE

ASSIGNED TO A THIRD PARTY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING
THE WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENT OF TDDG, INC. IN

THE EVENT OF UNAUTHORIZED REUSE OF THESE PLANS BY A

THIRD PARTY, THE THIRD PARTY SHALL HOLD THE DESIGN
AND DEVELOPMENT GROUP HARMLESS.
97 BOSTON AVE
S A N J O S E, C A 9 5 1 2 8
T 6 5 0 . 4 8 3 . 9 4 5 4
www.tddgus.com

THE DESIGN &

DEVELOPMENT GROUP
PROJECT DESIGNER:

DE NGUYEN
PD MODIFICATION COMMENTS03/15/22

NEW SINGLE FAMILY HOUSES
PD MODIFICATION COMMENTS05/25/22
AB.5.3
(LOT 2)
COLORED ELEVATION - LOT 2

1. CERTAINTEED ROOFING

PRESIDENTIAL TL

CHARCOAL BLACK

2. PAINTED SURFACE
KM4968 ARCTIC
WHITE

3. HORIZONTAL WALL SIDINGS

KELLY MOORE
KM5816 HARRISON GRAY

4. VERTICAL WALL SIDINGS

KELLY MOORE
KM5816 HARRISON GRAY

5. STANDING SEAM

METAL ROOF

MATTE-BLACK
1 4
3 7
2 2
7 1
5 7. SMOOTH WHITE
STUCCO
2 6. BORDERS/TRIMS/FRAMES

KELLY MOORE
KM4883 BLACK CAT
6 6
1 6.c
Packet Pg. 219
Attachment: Project_Plans (PLN-2022-13 ~ 1429 & 1445 Westmont Avenue) 12 9
12 9
12 6
12 6
12 6
12 3
12 4
12 4
12 6
12 3
12 4
12 4
12 4
12 4
12 4
12 4
12 4
12 3

CAMPBELL, CA

LOT SUBDIVISION & SIX
1429 & 1445 WESTMONT AVE

THE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT GROUP EXPRESSLY

RESERVES ITS COMMON ITS COMMON LAW COPYRIGHT AND
OTHER PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THESE PLANS. THESE PLANS

ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED, CHANGED, OR COPIED IN

ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER, NOR ARE THEY TO BE

ASSIGNED TO A THIRD PARTY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING
THE WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENT OF TDDG, INC. IN

THE EVENT OF UNAUTHORIZED REUSE OF THESE PLANS BY A

THIRD PARTY, THE THIRD PARTY SHALL HOLD THE DESIGN
AND DEVELOPMENT GROUP HARMLESS.
97 BOSTON AVE
S A N J O S E, C A 9 5 1 2 8
T 6 5 0 . 4 8 3 . 9 4 5 4
www.tddgus.com

THE DESIGN &

DEVELOPMENT GROUP
PROJECT DESIGNER:

DE NGUYEN
PD MODIFICATION COMMENTS03/15/22

NEW SINGLE FAMILY HOUSES
PD MODIFICATION COMMENTS05/25/22
PROPOSED ROOF PLAN (PLAN B- LOT 2)
SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0"
N
TRUE
NORTH
AB.6
(LOT 2)
1 6.c
Packet Pg. 220
Attachment: Project_Plans (PLN-2022-13 ~ 1429 & 1445 Westmont Avenue) BEDR00M #1
GARAGE
UP

FAMILY ROOM DINNING ROOM
FOYER
J. ADU BEDROOM #2

SEATING AREA
CLOSET
CLOSET
BATH 1
BATH 2
W/D
CLO.

BUILDING LINE ABOVE
DW

KITCHEN
REF.

CLO.

REF.
12'-6" 17'-0" 13'-6"
43'-0"
8'-0"19'-0"4'-0"2'-6"13'-0"7'-8"
54'-2"
12'-6"12'-0"8'-6"21'-0"
54'-0"
21'-0"22'-0"
43'-0"
PORCH
20'-0"
20'-0"
M. BATH #3
BEDROOM #5
DW
DN
BATH #4

LAUNDRY
CLO.

BEDROOM #4
W.I.C.

M. BEDROOM #3
CLO.
19'-6" 13'-0"
17'-6" 19'-6"
15'-6"19'-6"
33'-6"
37'-0"
37'-0"
38'-6"
1'-6"
12'-6" 2'-6" 6'-8"
15'-0"6'-6"12'-0"
5'-0"
38'-6"
5'-6"12'-0" 8'-0" 11'-6"
1'-6"
3'-6"
3'-6"4'-6"

BUILDING LINE BELOW
2'-5"
AB.4
PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN - FIRST FLOOR (PLAN B-LOT 3)
SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0"

CAMPBELL, CA

LOT SUBDIVISION & SIX
1429 & 1445 WESTMONT AVE

THE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT GROUP EXPRESSLY

RESERVES ITS COMMON ITS COMMON LAW COPYRIGHT AND
OTHER PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THESE PLANS. THESE PLANS

ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED, CHANGED, OR COPIED IN

ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER, NOR ARE THEY TO BE

ASSIGNED TO A THIRD PARTY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING
THE WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENT OF TDDG, INC. IN

THE EVENT OF UNAUTHORIZED REUSE OF THESE PLANS BY A

THIRD PARTY, THE THIRD PARTY SHALL HOLD THE DESIGN
AND DEVELOPMENT GROUP HARMLESS.
97 BOSTON AVE
S A N J O S E, C A 9 5 1 2 8
T 6 5 0 . 4 8 3 . 9 4 5 4
www.tddgus.com

THE DESIGN &

DEVELOPMENT GROUP
PROJECT DESIGNER:

DE NGUYEN
PD MODIFICATION COMMENTS03/15/22

NEW SINGLE FAMILY HOUSES
PD MODIFICATION COMMENTS05/25/22
N
TRUE
NORTH
PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN - SECOND FLOOR (PLAN B-LOT 3)
SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0"
N
TRUE
NORTH
(LOT 3)
1 1
1 6.c
Packet Pg. 221
Attachment: Project_Plans (PLN-2022-13 ~ 1429 & 1445 Westmont Avenue) BEDR00M #1
GARAGE
UP

FAMILY ROOM DINNING ROOM
FOYER
J. ADU BEDROOM #2

SEATING AREA
CLOSET
CLOSET
BATH 1
BATH 2
W/D
CLO.

DW

KITCHEN
REF.

CLO.

REF.

PORCH
B
A
D E
F
17'-6"
21'-0"
25'-0"
8'-0"
15'-6" 6'-6"
13'-6"
21'-0"
30'-1"
12'-6"
C
3'-6"
8'-0" 25'-0"K
L
13'-0"
9'-6"
FIRST FLOOR LIVING AREA (MAIN HOUSE):

TOTAL:

SECOND FLOOR LIVING AREA:

TOTAL:
441.00 SF
441.00 SF21'-0" x 21'-0"
FIRST FLOOR LIVING AREA: =
SECOND FLOOR LIVING AREA: =
TOTAL HATBITABLE AREA: 2,447.75 SF=
GARAGE
F =
TOTAL GARAGE: =
1,208.50 SF
1,239.25 SF
GARAGE: = 441.00 SF
MAIN HOUSE TOTAL FLOOR AREA: 2,888.75 SF=
196.00 SFPORCH
17'-6" x 8'-0"
30'-1" x 25'-0"
3'-6" x 8'-0"
15'-6" x 13'-6"
6'-6" x 12'-6"
A
B
C
D
E
19'-6" x 21'-0"
15'-6" x 19'-6"
24'-0" x 12'-6"
13'-0" x 17'-6"
G
H
I
J
=
=
=
=
409.50 SF
302.25 SF
300.00 SF
227.50 SF
=
=
=
=
=
140.00 SF
750.00 SF

28.00 SF
209.25 SF

81.25 SF
= 1,208.50 SF
= 1,239.25 SF
MAIN HOUSE:

FIRST FLOOR LIVING AREA (JADU):

TOTAL:
13'-0" x 25'-0"
9'-6" x 8'-0"
K
L
=
=
325.00 SF

76.00 SF
= 401.00 SF
JADU FLOOR AREA: 401.00 SF
TOTAL FLOOR AREA: 3,289.75 SF=
LOT AREA: 6,526 SF=
LOT COVERAGE:
=1,845.5/6,526
GARAGE:

PORCH:
=
=
=
TOTAL : = 1,845.50 SF

28.3%
1,208.50 SF
441.00 SF
196.00 SF

FIRST FLOOR LIVING AREA (MAIN HOUSE)
F.A.R.(MAIN HOUSE ONLY):

44.3%=2,889/6,526
M. BATH #3
BEDROOM #5
DW
DN
BATH #4

LAUNDRY
CLO.

BEDROOM #4
W.I.C.

M. BEDROOM #3
CLO.

G
I
J
H
24'-0" 13'-0"
17'-6" 19'-6"
12'-6" 21'-0"
19'-6" 15'-6"

CAMPBELL, CA

LOT SUBDIVISION & SIX
1429 & 1445 WESTMONT AVE

THE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT GROUP EXPRESSLY

RESERVES ITS COMMON ITS COMMON LAW COPYRIGHT AND
OTHER PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THESE PLANS. THESE PLANS

ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED, CHANGED, OR COPIED IN

ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER, NOR ARE THEY TO BE

ASSIGNED TO A THIRD PARTY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING
THE WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENT OF TDDG, INC. IN

THE EVENT OF UNAUTHORIZED REUSE OF THESE PLANS BY A

THIRD PARTY, THE THIRD PARTY SHALL HOLD THE DESIGN
AND DEVELOPMENT GROUP HARMLESS.
97 BOSTON AVE
S A N J O S E, C A 9 5 1 2 8
T 6 5 0 . 4 8 3 . 9 4 5 4
www.tddgus.com

THE DESIGN &

DEVELOPMENT GROUP
PROJECT DESIGNER:

DE NGUYEN
PD MODIFICATION COMMENTS03/15/22

NEW SINGLE FAMILY HOUSES
PD MODIFICATION COMMENTS05/25/22
AB.FAR
(LOT 3)
FIRST FLOOR AREA DIAGRAM (PLAN B-LOT 3)
SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0"
N
TRUE
NORTH
SECOND FLOOR AREA DIAGRAM (PLAN B-LOT 3)
SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0"
N
TRUE
NORTH
1 6.c
Packet Pg. 222
Attachment: Project_Plans (PLN-2022-13 ~ 1429 & 1445 Westmont Avenue) XX
9 12
9 12
12'-4" FIRST FL. WALL HT.
21'-10" SECOND FL. WALL HT.
19'-8" SECOND FL. WALL HT.

TOP PLATE
9'-0"
25'-6"
PROPOSED ADJACENT GRADE +230.00'

FINISH FLOOR
9'-0"

TOP PLATE
2nd FINISH FLOOR

TOP OF RIDGE
5'-11"

AVERAGE NATURAL GRADE AT

HOUSE FOORPRINT
+228.90'
19'-8" TOTAL WALL HT.FROM PROPOSED GARDE
28' ABV. EXTG GROUND LINE
(HEIGHT LIMIT)
8"
9'-8" FIRST FL. WALL HT.
19'-8" SECOND FL. WALL HT.

TOP PLATE
9'-0"

FINISH FLOOR
9'-0"

TOP PLATE
2nd FINISH FLOOR
25'-6" MAX. STRUCTURE HEIGHT
10'-8" FINISH FLOOR HEGHT 3'-0"
STUCCO TYP.

COMPOSITION

SHINGLE ROOF
MINIMUM CLASS "C"
OVER 30# FELT
SMOOTH
STUCCO
TYP.

COMPOSITION

SHINGLE ROOF
MINIMUM CLASS "C"
OVER 30# FELT

NATURAL STONE
VENEER
12 4
4 12

COMPOSITION

SHINGLE ROOF
MINIMUM CLASS "C"
OVER 30# FELT

COMPOSITION

SHINGLE ROOF
MINIMUM CLASS "C"
OVER 30# FELT
9'-8" FIRST FL. WALL HT.
19'-8" SECOND FL. WALL HT.
19'-8" SECOND FL. WALL HT.
11'-5" FIRST FL. WALL HT.
22'-4" SECOND FL. WALL HT.

TOP PLATE
9'-0"
25'-6"
PROPOSED ADJACENT GRADE +230.00'

FINISH FLOOR
9'-0"

TOP PLATE
2nd FINISH FLOOR

TOP OF RIDGE
5'-11"

AVERAGE NATURAL GRADE AT

HOUSE FOORPRINT
+228.90'
19'-8" TOTAL WALL HT.FROM PROPOSED GARDE
28' ABV. EXTG GROUND LINE
(HEIGHT LIMIT)
8"
10'-8" FINISH FLOOR HEGHT
STUCCO TYP.

SMOOTH
STUCCO
TYP.

AB.5.1

CAMPBELL, CA

LOT SUBDIVISION & SIX
1429 & 1445 WESTMONT AVE

THE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT GROUP EXPRESSLY

RESERVES ITS COMMON ITS COMMON LAW COPYRIGHT AND
OTHER PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THESE PLANS. THESE PLANS

ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED, CHANGED, OR COPIED IN

ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER, NOR ARE THEY TO BE

ASSIGNED TO A THIRD PARTY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING
THE WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENT OF TDDG, INC. IN

THE EVENT OF UNAUTHORIZED REUSE OF THESE PLANS BY A

THIRD PARTY, THE THIRD PARTY SHALL HOLD THE DESIGN
AND DEVELOPMENT GROUP HARMLESS.
97 BOSTON AVE
S A N J O S E, C A 9 5 1 2 8
T 6 5 0 . 4 8 3 . 9 4 5 4
www.tddgus.com

THE DESIGN &

DEVELOPMENT GROUP
PROJECT DESIGNER:

DE NGUYEN
PD MODIFICATION COMMENTS03/15/22

NEW SINGLE FAMILY HOUSES
PD MODIFICATION COMMENTS05/25/22
PROPOSED FRONT ELEVATION (PLAN B- LOT 3)
SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0"
PROPOSED RIGHT ELEVATION (PLAN B- LOT 3)
SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0"
(LOT 3)
1 2
2 6.c
Packet Pg. 223
Attachment: Project_Plans (PLN-2022-13 ~ 1429 & 1445 Westmont Avenue) 12 4
9 12
12 4
9'-8" FIRST FL. WALL HT.
19'-8" SECOND FL. WALL HT.
19'-8" SECOND FL. WALL HT.
12'-2" FIRST FL. WALL HT.
22'-0" SECOND FL. WALL HT.

TOP PLATE
9'-0"
25'-6"
PROPOSED ADJACENT GRADE +230.00'

FINISH FLOOR
9'-0"

TOP PLATE
2nd FINISH FLOOR

TOP OF RIDGE
5'-11"

AVERAGE NATURAL GRADE AT
19'-8" TOTAL WALL HT.FROM PROPOSED GARDE
28' ABV. EXTG GROUND LINE
(HEIGHT LIMIT)
8"

COMPOSITION

SHINGLE ROOF
MINIMUM CLASS "C"
OVER 30# FELT
STUCCO TYP.

SMOOTH
STUCCO
TYP.

COMPOSITION

SHINGLE ROOF
MINIMUM CLASS "C"
OVER 30# FELT
STUCCO TYP.
4 12
4 12
9'-8" FIRST FL. WALL HT.
19'-8" SECOND FL. WALL HT.
11'-5" FIRST FL. WALL HT.
22'-4" SECOND FL. WALL HT.
9'-8" FIRST FL. WALL HT.

TOP PLATE
9'-0"
25'-6"
PROPOSED ADJACENT GRADE +230.00'

FINISH FLOOR
9'-0"

TOP PLATE
2nd FINISH FLOOR

TOP OF RIDGE
5'-11"

AVERAGE NATURAL GRADE AT
19'-8" TOTAL WALL HT.FROM PROPOSED GARDE
28' ABV. EXTG GROUND LINE
(HEIGHT LIMIT)
8"
10'-8" FINISH FLOOR HEGHT

COMPOSITION

SHINGLE ROOF
MINIMUM CLASS "C"
OVER 30# FELT
SMOOTH
STUCCO
TYP.

CAMPBELL, CA

LOT SUBDIVISION & SIX
1429 & 1445 WESTMONT AVE

THE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT GROUP EXPRESSLY

RESERVES ITS COMMON ITS COMMON LAW COPYRIGHT AND
OTHER PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THESE PLANS. THESE PLANS

ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED, CHANGED, OR COPIED IN

ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER, NOR ARE THEY TO BE

ASSIGNED TO A THIRD PARTY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING
THE WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENT OF TDDG, INC. IN

THE EVENT OF UNAUTHORIZED REUSE OF THESE PLANS BY A

THIRD PARTY, THE THIRD PARTY SHALL HOLD THE DESIGN
AND DEVELOPMENT GROUP HARMLESS.
97 BOSTON AVE
S A N J O S E, C A 9 5 1 2 8
T 6 5 0 . 4 8 3 . 9 4 5 4
www.tddgus.com

THE DESIGN &

DEVELOPMENT GROUP
PROJECT DESIGNER:

DE NGUYEN
PD MODIFICATION COMMENTS03/15/22

NEW SINGLE FAMILY HOUSES
PD MODIFICATION COMMENTS05/25/22
PROPOSED LEFT ELEVATION (PLAN B- LOT 3)
SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0"
PROPOSED REAR ELEVATION (PLAN B- LOT 3)
SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0"
AB.5.2
(LOT 3)
1 1

6.c
Packet Pg. 224
Attachment: Project_Plans (PLN-2022-13 ~ 1429 & 1445 Westmont Avenue)

CAMPBELL, CA

LOT SUBDIVISION & SIX
1429 & 1445 WESTMONT AVE

THE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT GROUP EXPRESSLY

RESERVES ITS COMMON ITS COMMON LAW COPYRIGHT AND
OTHER PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THESE PLANS. THESE PLANS

ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED, CHANGED, OR COPIED IN

ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER, NOR ARE THEY TO BE

ASSIGNED TO A THIRD PARTY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING
THE WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENT OF TDDG, INC. IN

THE EVENT OF UNAUTHORIZED REUSE OF THESE PLANS BY A

THIRD PARTY, THE THIRD PARTY SHALL HOLD THE DESIGN
AND DEVELOPMENT GROUP HARMLESS.
97 BOSTON AVE
S A N J O S E, C A 9 5 1 2 8
T 6 5 0 . 4 8 3 . 9 4 5 4
www.tddgus.com

THE DESIGN &

DEVELOPMENT GROUP
PROJECT DESIGNER:

DE NGUYEN
PD MODIFICATION COMMENTS03/15/22

NEW SINGLE FAMILY HOUSES
PD MODIFICATION COMMENTS05/25/22
AB.5.3
(LOT 3)
COLORED ELEVATION - LOT 3

1. CERTAINTEED ROOFING

PRESIDENTIAL TL

CHARCOAL BLACK

2. PAINTED SURFACE
KM4968 ARCTIC
WHITE

4. TRIMS/FRAMES

KELLY MOORE
KM4883 BLACK CAT

3. SMOOTH WHITE
STUCCO
1 4
3 1
2 2
4 2
3 4
3 1

6.c
Packet Pg. 225
Attachment: Project_Plans (PLN-2022-13 ~ 1429 & 1445 Westmont Avenue) 12 4
12 4
12 4
12 4
12 4
12 4
12 4
12 4
12 4
12 9
12 9
12 4
12 4
12 4
12 9
12 9
12 9
12 9
12 4
12 4

CAMPBELL, CA

LOT SUBDIVISION & SIX
1429 & 1445 WESTMONT AVE

THE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT GROUP EXPRESSLY

RESERVES ITS COMMON ITS COMMON LAW COPYRIGHT AND
OTHER PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THESE PLANS. THESE PLANS

ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED, CHANGED, OR COPIED IN

ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER, NOR ARE THEY TO BE

ASSIGNED TO A THIRD PARTY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING
THE WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENT OF TDDG, INC. IN

THE EVENT OF UNAUTHORIZED REUSE OF THESE PLANS BY A

THIRD PARTY, THE THIRD PARTY SHALL HOLD THE DESIGN
AND DEVELOPMENT GROUP HARMLESS.
97 BOSTON AVE
S A N J O S E, C A 9 5 1 2 8
T 6 5 0 . 4 8 3 . 9 4 5 4
www.tddgus.com

THE DESIGN &

DEVELOPMENT GROUP
PROJECT DESIGNER:

DE NGUYEN
PD MODIFICATION COMMENTS03/15/22

NEW SINGLE FAMILY HOUSES
PD MODIFICATION COMMENTS05/25/22
AB.6
(LOT 3)
PROPOSED ROOF PLAN (PLAN B- LOT 3)
SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0"
N
TRUE
NORTH
1 6.c
Packet Pg. 226
Attachment: Project_Plans (PLN-2022-13 ~ 1429 & 1445 Westmont Avenue) MASTER BEDROOM #1
DN.

BEDROOM #3

WALK-IN
CLOSET
HALL
BEDROOM #2
MASTER
BATH #1
BATH #2
28'-6"
46'-0"
15'-0"9'-6"8'-0"13'-6"
28'-6"
12'-6"3'-0"13'-0"
46'-0"
10'-0"11'-6"8'-6"3'-0"11'-6"1'-6"
15'-6"13'-0"

BUILDING LINE BELOW

BUILDING LINE BELOW

BUILDING LINE BELOW
WD

LAUNDRY
PORCH
GARAGE

LIVING ROOM

FAMILY ROOM
BEDROOM #4
FOYER
BATH #3

BUILDING LINE ABOVE
UP
PANTRY

KITCHEN

DINING ROOM
REF.

O/M

BUILDING LINE ABOVE
53'-6"
53'-0"
3'-6"21'-0"8'-6"15'-0"5'-0"
20'-6"17'-6"15'-6"
53'-0"
10'-0"16'-6"5'-6"3'-0"10'-6"7'-6"
20'-9"15'-3"5'-0"12'-6"
53'-6"
Hidden door
CLO.
20'-0"
20'-0"
PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN - FIRST FLOOR (PLAN C- LOT 4)
SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0"

CAMPBELL, CA

LOT SUBDIVISION & SIX
1429 & 1445 WESTMONT AVE

THE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT GROUP EXPRESSLY

RESERVES ITS COMMON ITS COMMON LAW COPYRIGHT AND
OTHER PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THESE PLANS. THESE PLANS

ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED, CHANGED, OR COPIED IN

ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER, NOR ARE THEY TO BE

ASSIGNED TO A THIRD PARTY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING
THE WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENT OF TDDG, INC. IN

THE EVENT OF UNAUTHORIZED REUSE OF THESE PLANS BY A

THIRD PARTY, THE THIRD PARTY SHALL HOLD THE DESIGN
AND DEVELOPMENT GROUP HARMLESS.
97 BOSTON AVE
S A N J O S E, C A 9 5 1 2 8
T 6 5 0 . 4 8 3 . 9 4 5 4
www.tddgus.com

THE DESIGN &

DEVELOPMENT GROUP
PROJECT DESIGNER:

DE NGUYEN
PD MODIFICATION COMMENTS03/15/22

NEW SINGLE FAMILY HOUSES
PD MODIFICATION COMMENTS05/25/22
N
TRUE
NORTH
PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN - SECOND FLOOR (PLAN C- LOT4)
SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0"
N
TRUE
NORTH
AC.4
(LOT 4)
1 1

6.c
Packet Pg. 227
Attachment: Project_Plans (PLN-2022-13 ~ 1429 & 1445 Westmont Avenue) PORCH
GARAGE

LIVING ROOM

FAMILY ROOM
BEDROOM #4
FOYER
BATH #3

BUILDING LINE ABOVE
UP
PANTRY

KITCHEN

DINING ROOM
REF.

O/M

BUILDING LINE ABOVE
Hidden door
CLO.
17'-6"
23'-6"
14'-6"8'-0"13'-6"
12'-6" 5'-0" 15'-6"
16'-0"
12'-6"
21'-0"
20'-6"
A
B
C
D
E
F G
15'-6"
24'-7"
FIRST FLOOR LIVING AREA:

A
B
C
E
364.25 SF

80.00 SF
162.50 SF
5'-0" x 16'-00"
=
=
=
12'-6" x 8'-0"D
224.75 SF=15'-6" x 14'-6"
100.00 SF=
12'-6" x 13'-6"
15'-6" x 23'-6"
TOTAL LIVING AREA: 1,362.44 SF=
H 232.50 SF=15'-6" x 15'-0"
SECOND FLOOR LIVING AREA:

I 279.05 SF15'-6" x 18'-0" =
TOTAL LIVING AREA: 1,161.80 SF=
J 149.50 SF13'-0" x 11'-6" =
K 149.58 SF13'-0" x 11'-6" =
L 201.59 SF15'-6" x 13'-0" =
F 430.94 SF=17'-6" x 24'-7" M 13'-0" x 11'-6" =
GARAGE
G 430.50 SF=20'-6"x 21'-0"
TOTAL GARAGE = 430.50 SF
245.86 SF
PORCH
LOT AREA: 6,569 SF=
F.A.R.: 44.9%=2,954.74/6,569
FIRST FLOOR LIVING AREA: =
SECOND FLOOR LIVING AREA: =
TOTAL LIVING AREA: 2,524.24 SF=
LOT COVERAGE:
=
FIRST FLOOR LIVING AREA:

GARAGE:

PORCH:
=
=
=
TOTAL : =
1,362.44 SF
1,161.80 SF
GARAGE: = 430.50 SF
TOTAL FLOOR AREA: 2,954.74 SF=
31%2,038.8/6,569
430.50 SF
245.86 SF
2,038.8 SF
1,362.44 SF
245.86 SFTOTAL PORCH =149.58 SF
MASTER BEDROOM #1
DN.

BEDROOM #3

WALK-IN
CLOSET
HALL
BEDROOM #2
MASTER
BATH #1
BATH #2

BUILDING LINE BELOW

BUILDING LINE BELOW

BUILDING LINE BELOW
WD

LAUNDRY
15'-6"
11'-6" 11'-6" 10'-0"
15'-0"
LM
K
J
H
I
11'-6"
15'-6"13'-0"
18'-0"13'-0"
13'-0"
FIRST FLOOR AREA DIAGRAM (PLAN C-LOT 4)
SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0"

CAMPBELL, CA

LOT SUBDIVISION & SIX
1429 & 1445 WESTMONT AVE

THE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT GROUP EXPRESSLY

RESERVES ITS COMMON ITS COMMON LAW COPYRIGHT AND
OTHER PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THESE PLANS. THESE PLANS

ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED, CHANGED, OR COPIED IN

ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER, NOR ARE THEY TO BE

ASSIGNED TO A THIRD PARTY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING
THE WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENT OF TDDG, INC. IN

THE EVENT OF UNAUTHORIZED REUSE OF THESE PLANS BY A

THIRD PARTY, THE THIRD PARTY SHALL HOLD THE DESIGN
AND DEVELOPMENT GROUP HARMLESS.
97 BOSTON AVE
S A N J O S E, C A 9 5 1 2 8
T 6 5 0 . 4 8 3 . 9 4 5 4
www.tddgus.com

THE DESIGN &

DEVELOPMENT GROUP
PROJECT DESIGNER:

DE NGUYEN
PD MODIFICATION COMMENTS03/15/22

NEW SINGLE FAMILY HOUSES
PD MODIFICATION COMMENTS05/25/22
N
TRUE
NORTH
SECOND FLOOR AREA DIAGRAM (PLAN C-LOT 4)
SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0"
N
TRUE
NORTH
AC.FAR
(LOT 4)

6.c
Packet Pg. 228
Attachment: Project_Plans (PLN-2022-13 ~ 1429 & 1445 Westmont Avenue)

COMPOSITION

SHINGLE ROOF
MINIMUM CLASS "C"
OVER 30# FELT
3-COAT STUCCO 7/8"
OVER 2 LAYERS OF

GRADE D PAPER
125
125

WOOD SIDING,
6" EXPOSURE TYP.

XX

TOP PLATE
10'-0"
24'-3"
PROPOSED ADJACENT GRADE +230.50'

FINISH FLOOR
9'-0"

TOP PLATE
2nd FINISH FLOOR

TOP OF RIDGE
3'-8"

AVERAGE NATURAL GRADE AT

HOUSE FOORPRINT
+228.00'
20'-8" TOTAL WALL HT.FROM PROPOSED GARDE
28' ABV. EXTG GROUND LINE
(HEIGHT LIMIT)
8"
8'-8" FIRST FL. WALL HT.
20'-8" SECOND FL. WALL HT.
10'-8" FIRST FL. WALL HT.
12 5

COMPOSITION

SHINGLE ROOF
MINIMUM CLASS "C"
OVER 30# FELT
21'-6" SECOND FL. WALL HT.
28'-0"

MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT
125
3-COAT STUCCO 7/8"
OVER 2 LAYERS OF

GRADE D PAPER

TOP PLATE
10'-0"
24'-3"
PROPOSED ADJACENT GRADE +230.50'

FINISH FLOOR
9'-0"

TOP PLATE
2nd FINISH FLOOR

TOP OF RIDGE
3'-8"

AVERAGE NATURAL GRADE AT

HOUSE FOORPRINT
+228.00'
20'-8" TOTAL WALL HT.FROM PROPOSED GARDE
28' ABV. EXTG GROUND LINE
(HEIGHT LIMIT)
8"
10'-8" FIRST FL. WALL HT.
20'-8" SECOND FL. WALL HT.
20'-10" SECOND FL. WALL HT.

COMPOSITION

SHINGLE ROOF
MINIMUM CLASS "C"
OVER 30# FELT
28'-0"

MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT
PROPOSED FRONT ELEVATION (PLAN C- LOT 4)
SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0"

CAMPBELL, CA

LOT SUBDIVISION & SIX
1429 & 1445 WESTMONT AVE

THE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT GROUP EXPRESSLY

RESERVES ITS COMMON ITS COMMON LAW COPYRIGHT AND
OTHER PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THESE PLANS. THESE PLANS

ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED, CHANGED, OR COPIED IN

ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER, NOR ARE THEY TO BE

ASSIGNED TO A THIRD PARTY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING
THE WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENT OF TDDG, INC. IN

THE EVENT OF UNAUTHORIZED REUSE OF THESE PLANS BY A

THIRD PARTY, THE THIRD PARTY SHALL HOLD THE DESIGN
AND DEVELOPMENT GROUP HARMLESS.
97 BOSTON AVE
S A N J O S E, C A 9 5 1 2 8
T 6 5 0 . 4 8 3 . 9 4 5 4
www.tddgus.com

THE DESIGN &

DEVELOPMENT GROUP
PROJECT DESIGNER:

DE NGUYEN
PD MODIFICATION COMMENTS03/15/22

NEW SINGLE FAMILY HOUSES
PD MODIFICATION COMMENTS05/25/22
PROPOSED RIGHT ELEVATION (PLAN C- LOT 4)
SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0"
AC.5.1
(LOT 4)

6.c
Packet Pg. 229
Attachment: Project_Plans (PLN-2022-13 ~ 1429 & 1445 Westmont Avenue) 125
3-COAT STUCCO 7/8"
OVER 2 LAYERS OF

GRADE D PAPER

TOP PLATE
10'-0"
24'-3"
PROPOSED ADJACENT GRADE +230.50'

FINISH FLOOR
9'-0"

TOP PLATE
2nd FINISH FLOOR

TOP OF RIDGE
3'-8"

AVERAGE NATURAL GRADE AT

HOUSE FOORPRINT
+228.00'
20'-8" TOTAL WALL HT.FROM PROPOSED GARDE
28' ABV. EXTG GROUND LINE
(HEIGHT LIMIT)
8"
10'-8" FIRST FL. WALL HT.
20'-8" SECOND FL. WALL HT.
8'-8" FIRST FL. WALL HT.
21'-6" SECOND FL. WALL HT.

COMPOSITION

SHINGLE ROOF
MINIMUM CLASS "C"
OVER 30# FELT

COMPOSITION

SHINGLE ROOF
MINIMUM CLASS "C"
OVER 30# FELT
28'-0"

MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT
10'-8" FIRST FL. WALL HT.
125
3-COAT STUCCO 7/8"
OVER 2 LAYERS OF

GRADE D PAPER

TOP PLATE
10'-0"
24'-3"
PROPOSED ADJACENT GRADE +230.50'

FINISH FLOOR
9'-0"

TOP PLATE
2nd FINISH FLOOR

TOP OF RIDGE
3'-8"

AVERAGE NATURAL GRADE AT

HOUSE FOORPRINT
+228.00'
20'-8" TOTAL WALL HT.FROM PROPOSED GARDE
28' ABV. EXTG GROUND LINE
(HEIGHT LIMIT)
8"
21'-2" SECOND FL. WALL HT.
10'-8" FIRST FL. WALL HT.
20'-8" SECOND FL. WALL HT.
20'-8" FIRST FL. WALL HT.

COMPOSITION

SHINGLE ROOF
MINIMUM CLASS "C"
OVER 30# FELT
28'-0"

MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT
PROPOSED REAR ELEVATION (PLAN C- LOT 4)
SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0"

CAMPBELL, CA

LOT SUBDIVISION & SIX
1429 & 1445 WESTMONT AVE

THE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT GROUP EXPRESSLY

RESERVES ITS COMMON ITS COMMON LAW COPYRIGHT AND
OTHER PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THESE PLANS. THESE PLANS

ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED, CHANGED, OR COPIED IN

ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER, NOR ARE THEY TO BE

ASSIGNED TO A THIRD PARTY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING
THE WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENT OF TDDG, INC. IN

THE EVENT OF UNAUTHORIZED REUSE OF THESE PLANS BY A

THIRD PARTY, THE THIRD PARTY SHALL HOLD THE DESIGN
AND DEVELOPMENT GROUP HARMLESS.
97 BOSTON AVE
S A N J O S E, C A 9 5 1 2 8
T 6 5 0 . 4 8 3 . 9 4 5 4
www.tddgus.com

THE DESIGN &

DEVELOPMENT GROUP
PROJECT DESIGNER:

DE NGUYEN
PD MODIFICATION COMMENTS03/15/22

NEW SINGLE FAMILY HOUSES
PD MODIFICATION COMMENTS05/25/22
PROPOSED LEFT ELEVATION (PLAN C- LOT 4)
SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0"
AC.5.2
(LOT 4)

6.c
Packet Pg. 230
Attachment: Project_Plans (PLN-2022-13 ~ 1429 & 1445 Westmont Avenue)

CAMPBELL, CA

LOT SUBDIVISION & SIX
1429 & 1445 WESTMONT AVE

THE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT GROUP EXPRESSLY

RESERVES ITS COMMON ITS COMMON LAW COPYRIGHT AND
OTHER PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THESE PLANS. THESE PLANS

ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED, CHANGED, OR COPIED IN

ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER, NOR ARE THEY TO BE

ASSIGNED TO A THIRD PARTY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING
THE WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENT OF TDDG, INC. IN

THE EVENT OF UNAUTHORIZED REUSE OF THESE PLANS BY A

THIRD PARTY, THE THIRD PARTY SHALL HOLD THE DESIGN
AND DEVELOPMENT GROUP HARMLESS.
97 BOSTON AVE
S A N J O S E, C A 9 5 1 2 8
T 6 5 0 . 4 8 3 . 9 4 5 4
www.tddgus.com

THE DESIGN &

DEVELOPMENT GROUP
PROJECT DESIGNER:

DE NGUYEN
PD MODIFICATION COMMENTS03/15/22

NEW SINGLE FAMILY HOUSES
PD MODIFICATION COMMENTS05/25/22
AC.5.3
(LOT 4)
COLORED ELEVATION - LOT 4

1. CERTAINTEED ROOFING

PRESIDENTIAL TL

CHARCOAL BLACK

2. PAINTED SURFACE
KM4968 ARCTIC
WHITE

3. HORIZONTAL WALL SIDINGS

KELLY MOORE
KM5816 HARRISON GRAY

4. VERTICAL WALL SIDINGS

KELLY MOORE
KM5816 HARRISON GRAY
1 4
3 1
2 5
4 2
6 5. SMOOTH WHITE
STUCCO

6. GARAGE GATE

KELLY MOORE
KM5816 HARRISON GRAY
5 1

6.c
Packet Pg. 231
Attachment: Project_Plans (PLN-2022-13 ~ 1429 & 1445 Westmont Avenue) 12 5
12 5
12 5
12 5
12 5
12 5
12 2
12 5
12 5
12 5
12 5
12 5
12 5
12 5
12 5
12 5
12 5
12 5
12 5

CAMPBELL, CA

LOT SUBDIVISION & SIX
1429 & 1445 WESTMONT AVE

THE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT GROUP EXPRESSLY

RESERVES ITS COMMON ITS COMMON LAW COPYRIGHT AND
OTHER PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THESE PLANS. THESE PLANS

ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED, CHANGED, OR COPIED IN

ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER, NOR ARE THEY TO BE

ASSIGNED TO A THIRD PARTY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING
THE WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENT OF TDDG, INC. IN

THE EVENT OF UNAUTHORIZED REUSE OF THESE PLANS BY A

THIRD PARTY, THE THIRD PARTY SHALL HOLD THE DESIGN
AND DEVELOPMENT GROUP HARMLESS.
97 BOSTON AVE
S A N J O S E, C A 9 5 1 2 8
T 6 5 0 . 4 8 3 . 9 4 5 4
www.tddgus.com

THE DESIGN &

DEVELOPMENT GROUP
PROJECT DESIGNER:

DE NGUYEN
PD MODIFICATION COMMENTS03/15/22

NEW SINGLE FAMILY HOUSES
PD MODIFICATION COMMENTS05/25/22
PROPOSED ROOF PLAN (PLAN C- LOT 4)
SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0"
N
TRUE
NORTH
AC.6
(LOT 4)

6.c
Packet Pg. 232
Attachment: Project_Plans (PLN-2022-13 ~ 1429 & 1445 Westmont Avenue) MASTER BEDROOM #1
DN.

BEDROOM #3

WALK-IN
CLOSET
HALL
BEDROOM #2
MASTER
BATH #1
BATH #2
28'-6"
46'-0"
15'-0"9'-6"8'-0"13'-6"
28'-6"
12'-6" 3'-0" 13'-0"
46'-0"
10'-0"11'-6"8'-6"3'-0"11'-6"1'-6"
15'-6" 13'-0"

BUILDING LINE BELOW

BUILDING LINE BELOW

BUILDING LINE BELOW
W D

LAUNDRY
PORCH
GARAGE

LIVING ROOM

FAMILY ROOM
BEDROOM #4
FOYER
BATH #3

BUILDING LINE ABOVE
UP
PANTRY

KITCHEN

DINING ROOM
REF.

O/M

BUILDING LINE ABOVE
53'-6"
52'-6"
3'-6"21'-0"8'-6"15'-0"4'-6"
20'-6" 17'-6" 15'-6"
52'-6"
10'-0"16'-6"5'-6"3'-0"10'-6"7'-0"
20'-9" 15'-3" 5'-0" 12'-6"
53'-6"
Hidden door
CLO.
20'-0"
20'-0"
PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN - FIRST FLOOR (PLAN C- LOT 5)
SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0"

CAMPBELL, CA

LOT SUBDIVISION & SIX
1429 & 1445 WESTMONT AVE

THE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT GROUP EXPRESSLY

RESERVES ITS COMMON ITS COMMON LAW COPYRIGHT AND
OTHER PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THESE PLANS. THESE PLANS

ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED, CHANGED, OR COPIED IN

ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER, NOR ARE THEY TO BE

ASSIGNED TO A THIRD PARTY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING
THE WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENT OF TDDG, INC. IN

THE EVENT OF UNAUTHORIZED REUSE OF THESE PLANS BY A

THIRD PARTY, THE THIRD PARTY SHALL HOLD THE DESIGN
AND DEVELOPMENT GROUP HARMLESS.
97 BOSTON AVE
S A N J O S E, C A 9 5 1 2 8
T 6 5 0 . 4 8 3 . 9 4 5 4
www.tddgus.com

THE DESIGN &

DEVELOPMENT GROUP
PROJECT DESIGNER:

DE NGUYEN
PD MODIFICATION COMMENTS03/15/22

NEW SINGLE FAMILY HOUSES
PD MODIFICATION COMMENTS05/25/22
N
TRUE
NORTH
PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN - SECOND FLOOR (PLAN C- LOT 5)
SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0"
N
TRUE
NORTH
AC.4
(LOT 5)
1 1

6.c
Packet Pg. 233
Attachment: Project_Plans (PLN-2022-13 ~ 1429 & 1445 Westmont Avenue) PORCH
GARAGE

LIVING ROOM

FAMILY ROOM
BEDROOM #4
FOYER
BATH #3

BUILDING LINE ABOVE
UP
PANTRY

KITCHEN

DINING ROOM
REF.

O/M

BUILDING LINE ABOVE
Hidden door
CLO.
17'-6"
23'-6"
14'-6"8'-0"13'-6"
12'-6"5'-0"15'-6"
16'-0"
12'-6"
21'-0"
20'-6"
A
B
C
D
E
FG
15'-6"
24'-7"
FIRST FLOOR LIVING AREA:

A
B
C
E
364.25 SF

80.00 SF
162.50 SF
5'-0" x 16'-00"
=
=
=
12'-6" x 8'-0"D
224.75 SF=15'-6" x 14'-6"
100.00 SF=
12'-6" x 13'-6"
15'-6" x 23'-6"
TOTAL LIVING AREA: 1,362.44 SF=
H 232.50 SF=15'-6" x 15'-0"
SECOND FLOOR LIVING AREA:

I 279.05 SF15'-6" x 18'-0" =
TOTAL LIVING AREA: 1,161.80 SF=
J 149.50 SF13'-0" x 11'-6" =
K 149.58 SF13'-0" x 11'-6" =
L 201.59 SF15'-6" x 13'-0" =
F 430.94 SF=17'-6" x 24'-7" M 13'-0" x 11'-6" =
GARAGE
G 430.50 SF=20'-6"x 21'-0"
TOTAL GARAGE = 430.50 SF
245.86 SF
PORCH
LOT AREA: 6,569 SF=
F.A.R.: 44.9%=2,954.74/6,569
FIRST FLOOR LIVING AREA: =
SECOND FLOOR LIVING AREA: =
TOTAL LIVING AREA: 2,524.24 SF=
LOT COVERAGE:
=
FIRST FLOOR LIVING AREA:

GARAGE:

PORCH:
=
=
=
TOTAL : =
1,362.44 SF
1,161.80 SF
GARAGE: = 430.50 SF
TOTAL FLOOR AREA: 2,954.74 SF=
31%2,038.8/6,569
430.50 SF
245.86 SF
2,038.8 SF
1,362.44 SF
245.86 SFTOTAL PORCH =149.58 SF
MASTER BEDROOM #1
DN.

BEDROOM #3

WALK-IN
CLOSET
HALL
BEDROOM #2
MASTER
BATH #1
BATH #2

BUILDING LINE BELOW

BUILDING LINE BELOW

BUILDING LINE BELOW
W D

LAUNDRY
15'-6"
11'-6" 11'-6" 10'-0"
15'-0"
L M
K
J
H
I
11'-6"
15'-6" 13'-0"
18'-0"13'-0"
13'-0"
FIRST FLOOR AREA DIAGRAM (PLAN C-LOT 5)
SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0"

CAMPBELL, CA

LOT SUBDIVISION & SIX
1429 & 1445 WESTMONT AVE

THE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT GROUP EXPRESSLY

RESERVES ITS COMMON ITS COMMON LAW COPYRIGHT AND
OTHER PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THESE PLANS. THESE PLANS

ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED, CHANGED, OR COPIED IN

ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER, NOR ARE THEY TO BE

ASSIGNED TO A THIRD PARTY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING
THE WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENT OF TDDG, INC. IN

THE EVENT OF UNAUTHORIZED REUSE OF THESE PLANS BY A

THIRD PARTY, THE THIRD PARTY SHALL HOLD THE DESIGN
AND DEVELOPMENT GROUP HARMLESS.
97 BOSTON AVE
S A N J O S E, C A 9 5 1 2 8
T 6 5 0 . 4 8 3 . 9 4 5 4
www.tddgus.com

THE DESIGN &

DEVELOPMENT GROUP
PROJECT DESIGNER:

DE NGUYEN
PD MODIFICATION COMMENTS03/15/22

NEW SINGLE FAMILY HOUSES
PD MODIFICATION COMMENTS05/25/22
N
TRUE
NORTH
SECOND FLOOR AREA DIAGRAM (PLAN C-LOT 5)
SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0"
N
TRUE
NORTH
AC.FAR
(LOT 5)

6.c
Packet Pg. 234
Attachment: Project_Plans (PLN-2022-13 ~ 1429 & 1445 Westmont Avenue)

COMPOSITION

SHINGLE ROOF
MINIMUM CLASS "C"
OVER 30# FELT

COMPOSITION

SHINGLE ROOF
MINIMUM CLASS "C"
OVER 30# FELT
3-COAT STUCCO 7/8"
OVER 2 LAYERS OF

GRADE D PAPER

AVERAGE NATURAL GRADE AT

HOUSE FOORPRINT
+227.80'
12 5
12 5

TOP PLATE
24'-3"
PROPOSED ADJACENT GRADE +230.50'

FINISH FLOOR
9'-0"

TOP PLATE
2nd FINISH FLOOR

TOP OF RIDGE
3'-8"

AVERAGE NATURAL GRADE AT

HOUSE FOORPRINT
+227.80'
20'-8" TOTAL WALL HT.FROM PROPOSED GARDE
28' ABV. EXTG GROUND LINE
(HEIGHT LIMIT)
10'-0"8"
10'-8" FIRST FL. WALL HT.
20'-8" SECOND FL. WALL HT.
8'-8" FIRST FL. WALL HT.

XX
21'-6" SECOND FL. WALL HT.

COMPOSITION

SHINGLE ROOF
MINIMUM CLASS "C"
OVER 30# FELT
28'-0"

MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT

COMPOSITION

SHINGLE ROOF
MINIMUM CLASS "C"
OVER 30# FELT
12 5
12 5
3-COAT STUCCO 7/8"
OVER 2 LAYERS OF

GRADE D PAPER
10'-8" FIRST FL. WALL HT.
20'-8" SECOND FL. WALL HT.
21'-2" SECOND FL. WALL HT.

TOP PLATE
24'-3"
PROPOSED ADJACENT GRADE +230.50'

FINISH FLOOR
9'-0"

TOP PLATE
2nd FINISH FLOOR

TOP OF RIDGE
3'-8"

AVERAGE NATURAL GRADE AT

HOUSE FOORPRINT
+227.80'
20'-8" TOTAL WALL HT.FROM PROPOSED GARDE
28' ABV. EXTG GROUND LINE
(HEIGHT LIMIT)
10'-0"8"

WOOD SIDING,
6" EXPOSURE TYP.
28'-0"

MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT
PROPOSED FRONT ELEVATION (PLAN C- LOT 5)
SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0"

CAMPBELL, CA

LOT SUBDIVISION & SIX
1429 & 1445 WESTMONT AVE

THE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT GROUP EXPRESSLY

RESERVES ITS COMMON ITS COMMON LAW COPYRIGHT AND
OTHER PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THESE PLANS. THESE PLANS

ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED, CHANGED, OR COPIED IN

ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER, NOR ARE THEY TO BE

ASSIGNED TO A THIRD PARTY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING
THE WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENT OF TDDG, INC. IN

THE EVENT OF UNAUTHORIZED REUSE OF THESE PLANS BY A

THIRD PARTY, THE THIRD PARTY SHALL HOLD THE DESIGN
AND DEVELOPMENT GROUP HARMLESS.
97 BOSTON AVE
S A N J O S E, C A 9 5 1 2 8
T 6 5 0 . 4 8 3 . 9 4 5 4
www.tddgus.com

THE DESIGN &

DEVELOPMENT GROUP
PROJECT DESIGNER:

DE NGUYEN
PD MODIFICATION COMMENTS03/15/22

NEW SINGLE FAMILY HOUSES
PD MODIFICATION COMMENTS05/25/22
PROPOSED RIGHT ELEVATION (PLAN C- LOT 5)
SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0"
AC.5.1
(LOT 5)

6.c
Packet Pg. 235
Attachment: Project_Plans (PLN-2022-13 ~ 1429 & 1445 Westmont Avenue)

COMPOSITION

SHINGLE ROOF
MINIMUM CLASS "C"
OVER 30# FELT
12 5
12 5

COMPOSITION

SHINGLE ROOF
MINIMUM CLASS "C"
OVER 30# FELT

STANDING

METAL SEAM
ROOF
3-COAT STUCCO 7/8"
OVER 2 LAYERS OF

GRADE D PAPER
8'-8" FIRST FL. WALL HT.
20'-8" SECOND FL. WALL HT.
10'-8" FIRST FL. WALL HT.

TOP PLATE
24'-3"
PROPOSED ADJACENT GRADE +230.50'

FINISH FLOOR
9'-0"

TOP PLATE
2nd FINISH FLOOR

TOP OF RIDGE
3'-8"

AVERAGE NATURAL GRADE AT

HOUSE FOORPRINT
+227.80'
20'-8" TOTAL WALL HT.FROM PROPOSED GARDE
28' ABV. EXTG GROUND LINE
(HEIGHT LIMIT)
10'-0"8"
28'-0"

MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT

COMPOSITION

SHINGLE ROOF
MINIMUM CLASS "C"
OVER 30# FELT
12 5 125
3-COAT STUCCO 7/8"
OVER 2 LAYERS OF

GRADE D PAPER
10'-8" FIRST FL. WALL HT.
20'-8" SECOND FL. WALL HT.
20'-8" FIRST FL. WALL HT.

TOP PLATE
24'-3"
PROPOSED ADJACENT GRADE +230.50'

FINISH FLOOR
9'-0"

TOP PLATE
2nd FINISH FLOOR

TOP OF RIDGE
3'-8"

AVERAGE NATURAL GRADE AT

HOUSE FOORPRINT
+227.80'
20'-8" TOTAL WALL HT.FROM PROPOSED GARDE
28' ABV. EXTG GROUND LINE
(HEIGHT LIMIT)
10'-0"8"
28'-0"

MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT
PROPOSED REAR ELEVATION (PLAN C- LOT 5)
SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0"

CAMPBELL, CA

LOT SUBDIVISION & SIX
1429 & 1445 WESTMONT AVE

THE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT GROUP EXPRESSLY

RESERVES ITS COMMON ITS COMMON LAW COPYRIGHT AND
OTHER PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THESE PLANS. THESE PLANS

ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED, CHANGED, OR COPIED IN

ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER, NOR ARE THEY TO BE

ASSIGNED TO A THIRD PARTY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING
THE WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENT OF TDDG, INC. IN

THE EVENT OF UNAUTHORIZED REUSE OF THESE PLANS BY A

THIRD PARTY, THE THIRD PARTY SHALL HOLD THE DESIGN
AND DEVELOPMENT GROUP HARMLESS.
97 BOSTON AVE
S A N J O S E, C A 9 5 1 2 8
T 6 5 0 . 4 8 3 . 9 4 5 4
www.tddgus.com

THE DESIGN &

DEVELOPMENT GROUP
PROJECT DESIGNER:

DE NGUYEN
PD MODIFICATION COMMENTS03/15/22

NEW SINGLE FAMILY HOUSES
PD MODIFICATION COMMENTS05/25/22
PROPOSED LEFT ELEVATION (PLAN C- LOT 5)
SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0"
AC.5.2
(LOT 5)
1 1

6.c
Packet Pg. 236
Attachment: Project_Plans (PLN-2022-13 ~ 1429 & 1445 Westmont Avenue)

CAMPBELL, CA

LOT SUBDIVISION & SIX
1429 & 1445 WESTMONT AVE

THE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT GROUP EXPRESSLY

RESERVES ITS COMMON ITS COMMON LAW COPYRIGHT AND
OTHER PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THESE PLANS. THESE PLANS

ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED, CHANGED, OR COPIED IN

ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER, NOR ARE THEY TO BE

ASSIGNED TO A THIRD PARTY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING
THE WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENT OF TDDG, INC. IN

THE EVENT OF UNAUTHORIZED REUSE OF THESE PLANS BY A

THIRD PARTY, THE THIRD PARTY SHALL HOLD THE DESIGN
AND DEVELOPMENT GROUP HARMLESS.
97 BOSTON AVE
S A N J O S E, C A 9 5 1 2 8
T 6 5 0 . 4 8 3 . 9 4 5 4
www.tddgus.com

THE DESIGN &

DEVELOPMENT GROUP
PROJECT DESIGNER:

DE NGUYEN
PD MODIFICATION COMMENTS03/15/22

NEW SINGLE FAMILY HOUSES
PD MODIFICATION COMMENTS05/25/22
AC.5.3
(LOT 5)
COLORED ELEVATION - LOT 5
1 4
3 1
2 5
1 2
6 6

1. CERTAINTEED ROOFING

PRESIDENTIAL TL

CHARCOAL BLACK

2. PAINTED SURFACE
KM4968 ARCTIC
WHITE

3. HORIZONTAL WALL SIDINGS

KELLY MOORE
KM5816 HARRISON GRAY

4. VERTICAL WALL SIDINGS

KELLY MOORE
KM5816 HARRISON GRAY

5. SMOOTH WHITE
STUCCO

6. GARAGE GATE

KELLY MOORE
KM5816 HARRISON GRAY
1 6.c
Packet Pg. 237
Attachment: Project_Plans (PLN-2022-13 ~ 1429 & 1445 Westmont Avenue) 12 5
12 5
12 5
12 5
12 5
12 5
12 5
12 5
12 5
12 5
12 2
12 5
12 5
12 5
12 5
12 5
12 5
12 5

CAMPBELL, CA

LOT SUBDIVISION & SIX
1429 & 1445 WESTMONT AVE

THE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT GROUP EXPRESSLY

RESERVES ITS COMMON ITS COMMON LAW COPYRIGHT AND
OTHER PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THESE PLANS. THESE PLANS

ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED, CHANGED, OR COPIED IN

ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER, NOR ARE THEY TO BE

ASSIGNED TO A THIRD PARTY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING
THE WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENT OF TDDG, INC. IN

THE EVENT OF UNAUTHORIZED REUSE OF THESE PLANS BY A

THIRD PARTY, THE THIRD PARTY SHALL HOLD THE DESIGN
AND DEVELOPMENT GROUP HARMLESS.
97 BOSTON AVE
S A N J O S E, C A 9 5 1 2 8
T 6 5 0 . 4 8 3 . 9 4 5 4
www.tddgus.com

THE DESIGN &

DEVELOPMENT GROUP
PROJECT DESIGNER:

DE NGUYEN
PD MODIFICATION COMMENTS03/15/22

NEW SINGLE FAMILY HOUSES
PD MODIFICATION COMMENTS05/25/22
PROPOSED ROOF PLAN (PLAN C- LOT 5)
SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0"
N
TRUE
NORTH
AC.6
(LOT 5)
1 6.c
Packet Pg. 238
Attachment: Project_Plans (PLN-2022-13 ~ 1429 & 1445 Westmont Avenue) REF.D/O
UP
F/W

KITCHEN
DW DW
PANTRY
FOYER

FAMILY ROOM

LIVING ROOM

BREAKFAST NOOK
MUD RM
GARAGE

DINING ROOM
POWDERCLO.

CLO.
47'-6"
11'-6"15'-0"5'-6"15'-6"
87'-6"
17'-0" 33'-0" 17'-0" 20'-6"
9'-0"21'-0"
48'-0"
8'-0"10'-0"
87'-6"
16'-6" 16'-0" 10'-8" 7'-10" 15'-6" 21'-0"
GALLERYW.IC.

GUEST BEDROOM #1 BATH #1
PORCH

BUILDING LINE ABOVE
W.IC.

BEDROOM #2
20'-0"
20'-0"
CAMPBELL, CA 95008

NEW CONSTRUCTION
1429&1445 WESTMONT AVE.

THE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT GROUP EXPRESSLY

RESERVES ITS COMMON ITS COMMON LAW COPYRIGHT AND
OTHER PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THESE PLANS. THESE PLANS

ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED, CHANGED, OR COPIED IN

ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER, NOR ARE THEY TO BE

ASSIGNED TO A THIRD PARTY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING
THE WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENT OF TDDG, INC. IN

THE EVENT OF UNAUTHORIZED REUSE OF THESE PLANS BY A

THIRD PARTY, THE THIRD PARTY SHALL HOLD THE DESIGN
AND DEVELOPMENT GROUP HARMLESS.
97 BOSTON AVE.

S A N J O S E, C A 95128
T 6 5 0 . 4 8 3 . 9 4 5 4
www.tddgus.com

THE DESIGN &

DEVELOPMENT GROUP
PROJECT DESIGNER:

DE NGUYEN

PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN - FIRST FLOOR (PLAN D)
SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0"
N
TRUE
NORTH AD.4.1
(LOT 6)
1 1

6.c
Packet Pg. 239
Attachment: Project_Plans (PLN-2022-13 ~ 1429 & 1445 Westmont Avenue) M. BEDRM #4

LIN/LAUNDRY
BEDROOM #5BEDROOM #3
WIC
M. BATH #3
LOFT
DN
D
W
14'-6"9'-6"
36'-0"
12'-0"
50'-0"
16'-0" 8'-0" 10'-0" 4'-7" 11'-5"
36'-0"
14'-6"21'-6"
50'-0"
2'-6" 11'-5"12'-1" 5'-6"15'-0" 3'-6"

BUILDING LINE BELOW

BUILDING LINE BELOW

BUILDING LINE BELOW

BUILDING LINE BELOW

BALCONY
CAMPBELL, CA 95008

NEW CONSTRUCTION
1429&1445 WESTMONT AVE.

THE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT GROUP EXPRESSLY

RESERVES ITS COMMON ITS COMMON LAW COPYRIGHT AND
OTHER PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THESE PLANS. THESE PLANS

ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED, CHANGED, OR COPIED IN

ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER, NOR ARE THEY TO BE

ASSIGNED TO A THIRD PARTY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING
THE WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENT OF TDDG, INC. IN

THE EVENT OF UNAUTHORIZED REUSE OF THESE PLANS BY A

THIRD PARTY, THE THIRD PARTY SHALL HOLD THE DESIGN
AND DEVELOPMENT GROUP HARMLESS.
97 BOSTON AVE.

S A N J O S E, C A 95128
T 6 5 0 . 4 8 3 . 9 4 5 4
www.tddgus.com

THE DESIGN &

DEVELOPMENT GROUP
PROJECT DESIGNER:

DE NGUYEN

PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN - SECOND FLOOR (PLAN D)
SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0"
N
TRUE
NORTH
AD.4.2
(LOT 6)

6.c
Packet Pg. 240
Attachment: Project_Plans (PLN-2022-13 ~ 1429 & 1445 Westmont Avenue) REF.D/O
UP
F/W

KITCHEN
DW DW
PANTRY
FOYER

FAMILY ROOM

LIVING ROOM

BREAKFAST NOOK
MUD RM
GARAGE

DINING ROOM
POWDERCLO.

CLO.

GALLERYW.IC.

GUEST BEDROOM #1 BATH #1
PORCH

BUILDING LINE ABOVE
W.IC.

BEDROOM #2
20'-0"
20'-0"
36'-0"
16'-0"17'-0" 18'-0"
15'-6" 21'-0"
17'-0" 17'-0"
16'-6"
45'-0"
17'-8" 18'-4"
11'-4"5'-8"
9'-0"
21'-0"
B
C
F
G
H
E
D
A
16'-0"
17'-0"
FIRST FLOOR LIVING AREA:

A
B
C
E
611.90 SF
719.97 SF
317.91 SF
45'-0" x 16'-0"
=
=
=
18'-4" x 17'-0"D

88.79 SF=5'-8" x 15'-6"
311.72 SF=
17'-8" x 18'-0"
36'-0" x 17'-0"
TOTAL LIVING AREA: 2,390.34 SF=
F 187.05 SF=11'-4" x 16'-6"
G 153.00 SF=9'-0" x 17'-0"
GARAGE
PORCH
TOTAL PORCH: =
H 441.00 SF=21'-0" x 21'-0"
TOTAL GARAGE: = 441.00 SF

94.54 SF
152.93
247.47 SF

FIRST FLOOR AREA DIAGRAM (PLAN D)
SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0"

CAMPBELL, CA

LOT SUBDIVISION & SIX
1429 & 1445 WESTMONT AVE

THE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT GROUP EXPRESSLY

RESERVES ITS COMMON ITS COMMON LAW COPYRIGHT AND
OTHER PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THESE PLANS. THESE PLANS

ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED, CHANGED, OR COPIED IN

ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER, NOR ARE THEY TO BE

ASSIGNED TO A THIRD PARTY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING
THE WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENT OF TDDG, INC. IN

THE EVENT OF UNAUTHORIZED REUSE OF THESE PLANS BY A

THIRD PARTY, THE THIRD PARTY SHALL HOLD THE DESIGN
AND DEVELOPMENT GROUP HARMLESS.
97 BOSTON AVE
S A N J O S E, C A 9 5 1 2 8
T 6 5 0 . 4 8 3 . 9 4 5 4
www.tddgus.com

THE DESIGN &

DEVELOPMENT GROUP
PROJECT DESIGNER:

DE NGUYEN
PD MODIFICATION COMMENTS03/15/22

NEW SINGLE FAMILY HOUSES
PD MODIFICATION COMMENTS05/25/22
N
TRUE
NORTH
AD.FAR.1
(LOT 6)

6.c
Packet Pg. 241
Attachment: Project_Plans (PLN-2022-13 ~ 1429 & 1445 Westmont Avenue) M. BEDRM #4

LIN/LAUNDRY
BEDROOM #5BEDROOM #3
WIC
M. BATH #3
LOFT
DN
D
W

BUILDING LINE BELOW

BUILDING LINE BELOW

BUILDING LINE BELOW

BUILDING LINE BELOW

BALCONY
21'-0" 15'-0"
36'-0"
24'-0"
K
I
J
L
24'-6" 9'-6" 16'-0"
I 514.44 SF=21'-0" x 24'-6"
SECOND FLOOR LIVING AREA:

J 367.46 SF15'-0" x 24'-6" =
TOTAL LIVING AREA: 1,607.95 SF=
K 342.05 SF36'-0" x 9'-6" =
L 384.00 SF24'-0" x 16-0" =
LOT AREA: 9,906 SF=
F.A.R.: 44.8%=4,439.29/9,906
LOT COVERAGE:
31%=3,089/9,906
=
441.00 SF=
247.47 SF=
TOTAL : 3,078.81 SF=
2,390.34 SF
FIRST FLOOR LIVING AREA: =
SECOND FLOOR LIVING AREA: =
TOTAL LIVING AREA: 3,998.29 SF=
2,390.34 SF
1,607.95 SF
GARAGE: = 441.00 SF
TOTAL FLOOR AREA: 4,439.29 SF=
FIRST FLOOR LIVING AREA:

GARAGE:

PORCH:

SECOND AREA DIAGRAM (PLAN D)
SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0"

CAMPBELL, CA

LOT SUBDIVISION & SIX
1429 & 1445 WESTMONT AVE

THE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT GROUP EXPRESSLY

RESERVES ITS COMMON ITS COMMON LAW COPYRIGHT AND
OTHER PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THESE PLANS. THESE PLANS

ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED, CHANGED, OR COPIED IN

ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER, NOR ARE THEY TO BE

ASSIGNED TO A THIRD PARTY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING
THE WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENT OF TDDG, INC. IN

THE EVENT OF UNAUTHORIZED REUSE OF THESE PLANS BY A

THIRD PARTY, THE THIRD PARTY SHALL HOLD THE DESIGN
AND DEVELOPMENT GROUP HARMLESS.
97 BOSTON AVE
S A N J O S E, C A 9 5 1 2 8
T 6 5 0 . 4 8 3 . 9 4 5 4
www.tddgus.com

THE DESIGN &

DEVELOPMENT GROUP
PROJECT DESIGNER:

DE NGUYEN
PD MODIFICATION COMMENTS03/15/22

NEW SINGLE FAMILY HOUSES
PD MODIFICATION COMMENTS05/25/22
N
TRUE
NORTH
AD.FAR.2
(LOT 6)

6.c
Packet Pg. 242
Attachment: Project_Plans (PLN-2022-13 ~ 1429 & 1445 Westmont Avenue) 129

COMPOSITION

SHINGLE ROOF
MINIMUM CLASS "C"
OVER 30# FELT

COMPOSITION

SHINGLE ROOF
MINIMUM CLASS "C"
OVER 30# FELT
129
STUCCO TYP. SMOOTH STUCCO TYP.

TOP PLATE
25'-5"
9'-0"
PROPOSED ADJACENT GRADE +230.00'

FINISH FLOOR

TOP PLATE
9'-0"
2nd FINISH FLOOR

TOP OF RIDGE
5'-10"

AVERAGE NATURAL GRADE AT

HOUSE FOORPRINT
+227.80'
19'-8" TOTAL WALL HT.FROM PROPOSED GARDE
28' ABV. EXTG GROUND LINE
(HEIGHT LIMIT)
8"
9'-8" FIRST FL. WALL HT.
19'-8" SECOND FL. WALL HT.
22'-4" SECOND FL. WALL HT.
9'-8" FIRST FL. WALL HT.
11'-3" FIRST FL. WALL HT.

COMPOSITION

SHINGLE ROOF
MINIMUM CLASS "C"
OVER 30# FELT
129
XX
STUCCO TYP.

MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT

NATURAL STONE
VENEER

COMPOSITION

SHINGLE ROOF
MINIMUM CLASS "C"
OVER 30# FELT
123
124
129

TOP PLATE
25'-5"
9'-0"
PROPOSED ADJACENT GRADE +230.00'

FINISH FLOOR

TOP PLATE
9'-0"
2nd FINISH FLOOR

TOP OF RIDGE
5'-10"

AVERAGE NATURAL GRADE AT

HOUSE FOORPRINT
+227.80'
19'-8" TOTAL WALL HT.FROM PROPOSED GARDE
28' ABV. EXTG GROUND LINE
(HEIGHT LIMIT)
8"
12'-9" FIRST FL. WALL HT.
12'-4" FIRST FL. WALL HT.
9'-8" FIRST FL. WALL HT.
19'-8" SECOND FL. WALL HT.

COMPOSITION

SHINGLE ROOF
MINIMUM CLASS "C"
OVER 30# FELT
22'-5" SECOND FL. WALL HT.
129
STUCCO TYP.
28'-0"

MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT
28'-0"

NATURAL STONE
VENEER

CAMPBELL, CA

LOT SUBDIVISION & SIX
1429 & 1445 WESTMONT AVE

THE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT GROUP EXPRESSLY

RESERVES ITS COMMON ITS COMMON LAW COPYRIGHT AND
OTHER PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THESE PLANS. THESE PLANS

ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED, CHANGED, OR COPIED IN

ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER, NOR ARE THEY TO BE

ASSIGNED TO A THIRD PARTY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING
THE WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENT OF TDDG, INC. IN

THE EVENT OF UNAUTHORIZED REUSE OF THESE PLANS BY A

THIRD PARTY, THE THIRD PARTY SHALL HOLD THE DESIGN
AND DEVELOPMENT GROUP HARMLESS.
97 BOSTON AVE
S A N J O S E, C A 9 5 1 2 8
T 6 5 0 . 4 8 3 . 9 4 5 4
www.tddgus.com

THE DESIGN &

DEVELOPMENT GROUP
PROJECT DESIGNER:

DE NGUYEN
PD MODIFICATION COMMENTS03/15/22

NEW SINGLE FAMILY HOUSES
PD MODIFICATION COMMENTS05/25/22

PROPOSED FRONT ELEVATION (PLAN D)
SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0"

PROPOSED LEFT ELEVATION (PLAN D)
SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0"
AD.5.1
(LOT 6)
2 1
1 2
2 6.c
Packet Pg. 243
Attachment: Project_Plans (PLN-2022-13 ~ 1429 & 1445 Westmont Avenue)

COMPOSITION

SHINGLE ROOF
MINIMUM CLASS "C"
OVER 30# FELT

COMPOSITION

SHINGLE ROOF
MINIMUM CLASS "C"
OVER 30# FELT

COMPOSITION

SHINGLE ROOF
MINIMUM CLASS "C"
OVER 30# FELT
12 9
12 9
SMOOTH STUCCO TYP.

TOP PLATE
25'-5"
9'-0"
PROPOSED ADJACENT GRADE +230.00'

FINISH FLOOR

TOP PLATE
9'-0"
2nd FINISH FLOOR

TOP OF RIDGE
5'-10"

AVERAGE NATURAL GRADE AT

HOUSE FOORPRINT
+227.80'
19'-8" TOTAL WALL HT.FROM PROPOSED GARDE
28' ABV. EXTG GROUND LINE
(HEIGHT LIMIT)
8"
9'-8" FIRST FL. WALL HT.
9'-8" FIRST FL. WALL HT.
19'-8" SECOND FL. WALL HT.
12'-9" FIRST FL. WALL HT.
9'-8" FIRST FL. WALL HT.
21'-4" SECOND FL. WALL HT.

STUCCO TYP.
28'-0"

MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT

NATURAL STONE
VENEER

COMPOSITION

SHINGLE ROOF
MINIMUM CLASS "C"
OVER 30# FELT

COMPOSITION

SHINGLE ROOF
MINIMUM CLASS "C"
OVER 30# FELT
129
124

TOP PLATE
25'-5"
9'-0"
PROPOSED ADJACENT GRADE +230.00'

FINISH FLOOR

TOP PLATE
9'-0"
2nd FINISH FLOOR

TOP OF RIDGE
5'-10"

AVERAGE NATURAL GRADE AT

HOUSE FOORPRINT
+227.80'
19'-8" TOTAL WALL HT.FROM PROPOSED GARDE
28' ABV. EXTG GROUND LINE
(HEIGHT LIMIT)
8"
12'-9" FIRST FL. WALL HT.
9'-8" FIRST FL. WALL HT.
13'-6" FIRST FL. WALL HT.
22'-0" SECOND FL. WALL HT.
129
123
12 4
STUCCO TYP.
28'-0"

MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT

NATURAL STONE
VENEER

CAMPBELL, CA

LOT SUBDIVISION & SIX
1429 & 1445 WESTMONT AVE

THE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT GROUP EXPRESSLY

RESERVES ITS COMMON ITS COMMON LAW COPYRIGHT AND
OTHER PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THESE PLANS. THESE PLANS

ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED, CHANGED, OR COPIED IN

ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER, NOR ARE THEY TO BE

ASSIGNED TO A THIRD PARTY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING
THE WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENT OF TDDG, INC. IN

THE EVENT OF UNAUTHORIZED REUSE OF THESE PLANS BY A

THIRD PARTY, THE THIRD PARTY SHALL HOLD THE DESIGN
AND DEVELOPMENT GROUP HARMLESS.
97 BOSTON AVE
S A N J O S E, C A 9 5 1 2 8
T 6 5 0 . 4 8 3 . 9 4 5 4
www.tddgus.com

THE DESIGN &

DEVELOPMENT GROUP
PROJECT DESIGNER:

DE NGUYEN
PD MODIFICATION COMMENTS03/15/22

NEW SINGLE FAMILY HOUSES
PD MODIFICATION COMMENTS05/25/22

PROPOSED REAR ELEVATION (PLAN D)
SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0"

PROPOSED RIGHT ELEVATION (PLAN D)
SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0"
AD.5.2
(LOT 6)
1 1
1 1

6.c
Packet Pg. 244
Attachment: Project_Plans (PLN-2022-13 ~ 1429 & 1445 Westmont Avenue)

CAMPBELL, CA

LOT SUBDIVISION & SIX
1429 & 1445 WESTMONT AVE

THE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT GROUP EXPRESSLY

RESERVES ITS COMMON ITS COMMON LAW COPYRIGHT AND
OTHER PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THESE PLANS. THESE PLANS

ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED, CHANGED, OR COPIED IN

ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER, NOR ARE THEY TO BE

ASSIGNED TO A THIRD PARTY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING
THE WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENT OF TDDG, INC. IN

THE EVENT OF UNAUTHORIZED REUSE OF THESE PLANS BY A

THIRD PARTY, THE THIRD PARTY SHALL HOLD THE DESIGN
AND DEVELOPMENT GROUP HARMLESS.
97 BOSTON AVE
S A N J O S E, C A 9 5 1 2 8
T 6 5 0 . 4 8 3 . 9 4 5 4
www.tddgus.com

THE DESIGN &

DEVELOPMENT GROUP
PROJECT DESIGNER:

DE NGUYEN
PD MODIFICATION COMMENTS03/15/22

NEW SINGLE FAMILY HOUSES
PD MODIFICATION COMMENTS05/25/22
AD.5.3
(LOT 6)
COLORED ELEVATION - LOT 6

1. CERTAINTEED ROOFING

PRESIDENTIAL TL

CHARCOAL BLACK

2. PAINTED SURFACE
KM4968 ARCTIC
WHITE

4. TRIMS/FRAMES

KELLY MOORE
KM4883 BLACK CAT

3. SMOOTH WHITE
STUCCO
1 1
3 4
3 2
4 3
4 4
4 3
3 4
1 6.c
Packet Pg. 245
Attachment: Project_Plans (PLN-2022-13 ~ 1429 & 1445 Westmont Avenue) 12 9
12 4
12 4
12 9
12 9
12 9
12 9
12 9
12 9
12 9
12 9
12 9
12 9
12 4
12 4
12 4
12 4
12 9
12 3
12 3
12 9
12 9
12 9
12 3

BALCONY

CAMPBELL, CA

LOT SUBDIVISION & SIX
1429 & 1445 WESTMONT AVE

THE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT GROUP EXPRESSLY

RESERVES ITS COMMON ITS COMMON LAW COPYRIGHT AND
OTHER PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THESE PLANS. THESE PLANS

ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED, CHANGED, OR COPIED IN

ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER, NOR ARE THEY TO BE

ASSIGNED TO A THIRD PARTY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING
THE WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENT OF TDDG, INC. IN

THE EVENT OF UNAUTHORIZED REUSE OF THESE PLANS BY A

THIRD PARTY, THE THIRD PARTY SHALL HOLD THE DESIGN
AND DEVELOPMENT GROUP HARMLESS.
97 BOSTON AVE
S A N J O S E, C A 9 5 1 2 8
T 6 5 0 . 4 8 3 . 9 4 5 4
www.tddgus.com

THE DESIGN &

DEVELOPMENT GROUP
PROJECT DESIGNER:

DE NGUYEN
PD MODIFICATION COMMENTS03/15/22

NEW SINGLE FAMILY HOUSES
PD MODIFICATION COMMENTS05/25/22

PROPOSED ROOF PLAN (PLAN D)
SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0"
N
TRUE
NORTH
AD.6
(LOT 6)
1 6.c
Packet Pg. 246
Attachment: Project_Plans (PLN-2022-13 ~ 1429 & 1445 Westmont Avenue) WIC
BEDROOM #2
MASTER BEDROOM #1
MASTER
BATH#1
29'-0"
12'-6" 16'-6"
49'-0"
12'-6"14'-0"
29'-0"
12'-0" 17'-0"
16'-0"10'-0"9'-0"14'-0"
49'-0"
BEDROOM #3
BATH #2

LAUNDRY
DN
D W
8'-0"14'-6"

BUILDING LINE BELOW

BUILDING LINE BELOW

BALCONY
M. BATH #3
BEDROOM #5
DW
DN
BATH #4

LAUNDRY
CLO.

BEDROOM #4
W.I.C.

M. BEDROOM #3
CLO.
19'-6" 13'-0"
17'-6" 19'-6"
15'-6"19'-6"
33'-6"
37'-0"
37'-0"
38'-6"
1'-6"
12'-6" 2'-6" 6'-8"
15'-0"6'-6"12'-0"
5'-0"
38'-6"
5'-6"12'-0" 8'-0" 11'-6"
54'-0"
1'-6"
3'-6"
3'-6"4'-6"

BUILDING LINE BELOW
2'-5"
M. BATH #3
BEDROOM #5
DW
DN
BATH #4

LAUNDRY
CLO.

BEDROOM #4
W.I.C.

M. BEDROOM #3
CLO.
19'-6" 13'-0"
17'-6" 19'-6"
15'-6"19'-6"
33'-6"
37'-0"
37'-0"
38'-6"
12'-6" 2'-6" 6'-8" 2'-5"
15'-0"6'-6"12'-0"
5'-0"
38'-6"
5'-6"12'-0" 8'-0"

BUILDING LINE BELOW
3'-6"
3'-6"4'-6"
M. BEDRM #4

LIN/LAUNDRY
BEDROOM #5 BEDROOM #3
WIC
M. BATH #3
LOFT
DN
D
W
14'-6"9'-6"
36'-0"
12'-0"
50'-0"
16'-0"8'-0"10'-0"4'-7"11'-5"
36'-0"
14'-6"21'-6"
50'-0"
2'-6"11'-5" 12'-1"5'-6" 15'-0"3'-6"

BUILDING LINE BELOW

BUILDING LINE BELOW

BUILDING LINE BELOW

BUILDING LINE BELOW

BALCONY
18'-0"
6'-0"
22'-5"
24'-5"
11'-0"
31'-6"
25'-0" DRIVEWAY DRIVEWAY
18'-0"
9'-8"
25'-0"
9'-4"
11'-10"
25'-11"
37'-11"
20'-3"
40'-9"
13'-9"
26'-3"
11'-8"
32'-6"
49'-6"
8'-3"
17'-3"
16'-0"
18'-0"

DRIVEWAY
19'-11"
D.S.

D.S.

D.S.

D.S.

D.S.

D.S.

DRIVEWAY

DRIVEWAY

WALKWAY
10'-6"
30'-6"
6'-6"
6'-0"

WALKWAY
28'-5"
30'-6"
LOT 1 LOT 2
PLAN B
LOT 6
PLAN A
PLAN D
13'-2"
28'-6"
9'-8"
9'-4"
11'-10"
13'-2"
28'-6"
18'-0"

DRIVEWAY
LOT 3
PLAN B 27'-0"
18'-0"

DRIVEWAY
10'-6"
6'-6"
6'-0"
4'-0"
27'-0"
21'-10"
20'-0"
24'-5"
26'-5"
28'-5"
25'-11"
37'-11"

WALKWAY WALKWAY
25'-0"
12'-10"
66'-0" 9'-0" 66'-0" 9'-0" 66'-0" 9'-0" 66'-0"
9'-0"

GUEST PARKING
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

SECOND-STORY

WINDOWS

SECOND-STORY

WINDOWS

SECOND-STORY

WINDOWS

SECOND-STORY

WINDOWS

EXISTING GROUND
LINE

21.2092
19'-11"
4'-0"

WALKWAY
FRONT
REAR
SIDE
REAR

FRONT FRONT
SIDE
FRONT

REAR REAR REAR

FRONT FRONT

STREET SIDE
SIDE
SIDE
SIDE
SIDE
REAR
R42'-0"

FIRE LANE
16'-0"
18'-0"

DRIVEWAY
LOT 4 LOT 5
18'-0"

DRIVEWAY

SECOND-STORY

WINDOWSSECOND-STORY

WINDOWS
A.C
MASTER BEDROOM #1
DN.

BEDROOM #3

WALK-IN
CLOSET
HALL
BEDROOM #2
MASTER
BATH #1
BATH #2
28'-6"
46'-0"
15'-0"9'-6"8'-0"13'-6"
28'-6"
12'-6"3'-0"13'-0"
46'-0"
10'-0"11'-6"8'-6"3'-0"11'-6"1'-6"
15'-6"13'-0"

BUILDING LINE BELOW

BUILDING LINE BELOW

BUILDING LINE BELOW
WD

LAUNDRY
MASTER BEDROOM #1
DN.

BEDROOM #3

WALK-IN
CLOSET
HALL
BEDROOM #2
MASTER
BATH #1
BATH #2
28'-6"
46'-0"
15'-0"9'-6"8'-0"13'-6"
28'-6"
12'-6" 3'-0" 13'-0"
46'-0"
10'-0"11'-6"8'-6"3'-0"11'-6"1'-6"
15'-6" 13'-0"

BUILDING LINE BELOW

BUILDING LINE BELOW

BUILDING LINE BELOW
W D

LAUNDRY

PLAN C PLAN C REVERSE
ABOVE 5FT SILL
ABOVE 5FT SILL
ABOVE 5FT SILL
ABOVE 5FT SILL
ABOVE 5FT SILL
ABOVE 5FT SILL
ABOVE 5FT SILL
1 GUEST PARKING GUEST PARKING GUEST PARKING
A.7

BEDROOM PRIVACY EXHIBIT
SCALE: 1/16"=1'-0"
N
TRUE
NORTH

CAMPBELL, CA

LOT SUBDIVISION & SIX
1429 & 1445 WESTMONT AVE

THE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT GROUP EXPRESSLY

RESERVES ITS COMMON ITS COMMON LAW COPYRIGHT AND
OTHER PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THESE PLANS. THESE PLANS

ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED, CHANGED, OR COPIED IN

ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER, NOR ARE THEY TO BE

ASSIGNED TO A THIRD PARTY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING
THE WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENT OF TDDG, INC. IN

THE EVENT OF UNAUTHORIZED REUSE OF THESE PLANS BY A

THIRD PARTY, THE THIRD PARTY SHALL HOLD THE DESIGN
AND DEVELOPMENT GROUP HARMLESS.
97 BOSTON AVE
S A N J O S E, C A 9 5 1 2 8
T 6 5 0 . 4 8 3 . 9 4 5 4
www.tddgus.com

THE DESIGN &

DEVELOPMENT GROUP
PROJECT DESIGNER:

DE NGUYEN
PD MODIFICATION COMMENTS03/15/22

NEW SINGLE FAMILY HOUSES
PD MODIFICATION COMMENTS05/25/22
1 6.c
Packet Pg. 247
Attachment: Project_Plans (PLN-2022-13 ~ 1429 & 1445 Westmont Avenue)

6.c
Packet Pg. 248
Attachment: Project_Plans (PLN-2022-13 ~ 1429 & 1445 Westmont Avenue)

6.c
Packet Pg. 249
Attachment: Project_Plans (PLN-2022-13 ~ 1429 & 1445 Westmont Avenue)

6.c
Packet Pg. 250
Attachment: Project_Plans (PLN-2022-13 ~ 1429 & 1445 Westmont Avenue)

6.c
Packet Pg. 251
Attachment: Project_Plans (PLN-2022-13 ~ 1429 & 1445 Westmont Avenue)

6.c
Packet Pg. 252
Attachment: Project_Plans (PLN-2022-13 ~ 1429 & 1445 Westmont Avenue)

6.c
Packet Pg. 253
Attachment: Project_Plans (PLN-2022-13 ~ 1429 & 1445 Westmont Avenue)

6.c
Packet Pg. 254
Attachment: Project_Plans (PLN-2022-13 ~ 1429 & 1445 Westmont Avenue)

6.c
Packet Pg. 255
Attachment: Project_Plans (PLN-2022-13 ~ 1429 & 1445 Westmont Avenue)

6.c
Packet Pg. 256
Attachment: Project_Plans (PLN-2022-13 ~ 1429 & 1445 Westmont Avenue)

6.c
Packet Pg. 257
Attachment: Project_Plans (PLN-2022-13 ~ 1429 & 1445 Westmont Avenue)

6.c
Packet Pg. 258
Attachment: Project_Plans (PLN-2022-13 ~ 1429 & 1445 Westmont Avenue)

6.c
Packet Pg. 259
Attachment: Project_Plans (PLN-2022-13 ~ 1429 & 1445 Westmont Avenue)

6.c
Packet Pg. 260
Attachment: Project_Plans (PLN-2022-13 ~ 1429 & 1445 Westmont Avenue)

6.c
Packet Pg. 261
Attachment: Project_Plans (PLN-2022-13 ~ 1429 & 1445 Westmont Avenue) ...

Designer
Date
09/22/2021
Scale
Not to Scale
Drawing No.

Summary
N1

6.c
Packet Pg. 262
Attachment: Project_Plans (PLN-2022-13 ~ 1429 & 1445 Westmont Avenue) ...

Designer
Date
09/22/2021
Scale
Not to Scale
Drawing No.

Summary
N2

6.c
Packet Pg. 263
Attachment: Project_Plans (PLN-2022-13 ~ 1429 & 1445 Westmont Avenue) ...

Designer
Date
09/22/2021
Scale
Not to Scale
Drawing No.

Summary
N3

6.c
Packet Pg. 264
Attachment: Project_Plans (PLN-2022-13 ~ 1429 & 1445 Westmont Avenue)

City
Council
Report

TITLE: Acceptance of an Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) Selective Traffic Enforcement Program (STEP) Grant (Resolution/Roll Call Vote)

RECOMMENDED ACTION

That the Ci ty Council adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute an agreement setting forth terms under which the City of Campbell may accept the 2023 Selective Traffic Enforcement Program grant from the State of California - Office of Traffic Safety and approve a budget adjustment to recognize the grant revenue and corresponding grant related expenditures

BACKGROUND

The Campbell Police Department is working to improve traffic safety by participating in publicized traffic enforcement campaigns, train ing officers in impairment detection, and conducting highly visible DUI and traffic enforcement operations.

Due to patrol staffing needs , the department’s traffic division had been operating in a reduced capacity. The traffic division continues to be fo rced to augment its staffing by enlisting help from the patrol division for assistance in major crash investigations, conducting traffic and DUI enforcement, which takes away time from their existing duties.

With a population of over 42,000 people, and b eing nestled next to San Jose, the most populous city in Northern California, the City of Campbell faces daily traffic challenges due to the limited enforcement and high traffic volumes. This was further exacerbated in January 2018 when the Campbell Police Department took over traffic responsibility of the San Tomas Expressway, which was previously serviced by contract agreement with CHP. The approximate 2.4 miles of the expressway is a heavily commuted route with HOV lanes and serves as a major thoroughfare.

The department's limited traffic staffing has greatly impacted traffic enforcement and as evident in our traffic data from 2019 to 2021, alcohol -involved injury crashes have doubled since 2019, tripling the number of injured victims. This is a major c oncern for the agency. The department intends to address these concerns by implementing increased enforcement, specifically between the hours of 10 PM to 3 AM, including holidays with an increased risk of DUI crashes.

Item: 7
Category: NEW BUSINESS
Meeting Date: November 15, 2022
7 Packet Pg. 265
Acceptance of an Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) Selective Traffic Enforcement Program (STEP) Grant

In January 2022, the Police Departme nt applied to the State of California Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) for a Selective Traffic Enforcement Program (STEP) grant. OTS grants are federally funded by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) designed to make California roadwa ys safer. The grant request was for overtime and training reimbursement to conduct DUI saturation patrols, DUI warrant service operations, collaborative DUI enforcement, traffic enforcement for distracted driving, seat belt violations, pedestrian and bicyc le violations, streets racing , and side shows.

In addition, the grant request was for training and travel reimbursement for officers to attend NHSTA Standardized Field Sobriety (SFST) training, NHTSA Advanced Roadside Impaired Driving Enforcement (ARIDE ) training and Drug Recognition Expert (DRE) training.

In August 2022, staff was advised of a tentative draft agreement by OTS for $75,000 in overtime and training reimbursement. In September 2022, staff was advised the agreement was approved with a no t to exceed amount of $75,000, attached as Exhibit A, assuming the City accepts the conditions in the grant agreement.

DISCUSSION

Based on current staffing levels (patrol and traffic), in addition to current calls for service and workload, staff believes the best way to address current traffic issues is with officers working dedicated traffic enforcement in the aforementioned areas on overtime. This would provide the officers with the ability to focus their time solely on the traffic issue assigned.

Staff worked with OTS, within the framework of the grant application, and the traffic enforcement needs of the city, to detail how overtime and training reimbursement would be best be utilized if approved, as detailed in the grant.

FISCAL IMPACT

The OTS grant provides up to $75,000 reimbursement for grant related expenditures in FY 2023. Thus, if the grant is accepted, staff also recommends approving a budget adjustment shown as Exhibit B of the resolution to recognize the grant revenue and grant rela ted expenditures in FY 2023. Furthermore, t here are no matching funds required by the grant. The city would be reimbursed fully for overtime and training expenditures as detailed in the grant.

Prepared by:

Dan Livingston, Police Captain
7 Packet Pg. 266
Acceptance of an Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) Selective Traffic Enforcement Program (STEP) Grant

Reviewed by:

Gary Berg, Police Chief

Approved by:

Brian Loventhal, City Manager

Attachment:
a. Resolution STEP Grant FY23
b. Exhibit A Grant Agreement FY23
c. Exhibit B Budget Adjustment Form
7 Packet Pg. 267
RESOLUTION NO. ________

BEING A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CAMPBELL

AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT SETTING FORTH TERMS UNDER WHICH THE CITY OF CAMPBELL MAY ACCEPT THE 2023

SELECTIVE TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM (STEP) GRANT FROM THE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA - OFFICE OF TRAFFIC SAFETY IN THE AMOUNT OF $75,000 IN FISCAL YEAR 2023 AND APPROVING A BUDGET ADJUSTMENT TO

RECOGNIZE THE GRANT REVENUE AND GRANT RELATED EXPENDITURES

WHEREAS, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHSTA) provides Federal grant funds to the State of California – Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) for education, enforcement programs, and technologies designed to make California’s roadways safer; and
WHEREAS, OTS evaluates potential programs to make effe ctive use of the Federal grant program funds; and
WHEREAS, the City of Campbell applied for an OTS Selective Traffic Enforcement Program (STEP) for overtime and training reimbursement to conduct DUI saturation patrols, DUI warrant service operations, collaborative DUI enforcement, traffic enforcement for distracted driving, seat belt violations, pedestrian and bicycle violations, streets racing and side shows; and
WHEREAS, the City of Campbell was awarded up to $75,000 by OTS for potential reimbursement for the aforementioned; and
WHEREAS, the interested parties have negotiated a proposed agreement to address their respective obligations and liabilities as shown in Exhibit A to this resolution; and
WHEREAS, a budget adjustment shown as E xhibit B is necessary to recognize the grant revenue and grant related expenditures.

THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Manager is authorized to execute an agreement setting forth terms under which the City of Campbell may accept the 2023 Selective Traffic Enforcement Program grant from the State of California – Office of Traffic Safety set forth in the Agreement and Exhibit A attached to this Resolution ; and the Finance Director is authorized to implement a budget adjustment shown as Exhibit B and incorporated by reference to recognize grant revenue of $75,000 from the Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) STEP Grant and grant related expenditures of $75,000 in Fiscal Year 2023.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 15th day of November, 2022, by the following roll call vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

7.a
Packet Pg. 268
Attachment: Resolution STEP Grant FY23 (Acceptance of an Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) Selective Traffic Enforcement Program (STEP) Grant) APPROVED:

___________________________
Paul Resnikoff, Mayor

ATTEST:

____________________________
Andrea Sanders, City Clerk

7.a
Packet Pg. 269
Attachment: Resolution STEP Grant FY23 (Acceptance of an Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) Selective Traffic Enforcement Program (STEP) Grant)

8/18/2022 11:39:03 AM Page 1 of 14

State of California – Office of Traffic Safety

GRANT AGREEMENT

GRANT NUMBER
PT23014

1. GRANT TITLE
Selective Traffic Enforcement Program (STEP)

2. NAME OF AGENCY 3. Grant Period
Campbell Police Department From:

To:
10/01/2022
09/30/2023 4. AGENCY UNIT TO ADMINISTER GRANT
Campbell Police Department

5. GRANT DESCRIPTION
Best practice strategies will be conducted to reduce the number of persons killed and injured in crashes involving alcohol and other primary crash factors. The funded strategies may include impaired driving enforcement, enforcement operations focusing on primary crash factors, distracted driving, night-time seat belt enforcement, special enforcement operations encouraging motorcycle safety, enforcement and public awareness in areas with a high number of bicycle and pedestrian crashes, and educational programs. These strategies are designed to earn media attention thus enhancing the overall deterrent effect.

6. Federal Funds Allocated Under This Agreement Shall Not Exceed: $75,000.00

7. TERMS AND CONDITIONS: The parties agree to comply with the terms and conditions of the following which are by this reference made a part of the Agreement:
 Schedule A – Problem Statement, Goals and Objectives and Method of Procedure  Schedule B – Detailed Budget Estimate and Sub-Budget Estimate (if applicable)  Schedule B-1 – Budget Narrative and Sub-Budget Narrative (if applicable)  Exhibit A – Certifications and Assurances
 Exhibit B* – OTS Grant Program Manual
 Exhibit C – Grant Electronic Management System (GEMS) Access *Items shown with an asterisk (*), are hereby incorporated by reference and made a part of this agreement as if attached hereto.

These documents can be viewed at the OTS home web page under Grants: www.ots.ca.gov.

We, the officials named below, hereby swear under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that we are duly authorized to legally bind the Grant recipient to the above described Grant terms and conditions.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement has been executed by the parties hereto.

8. Approval Signatures
A. GRANT DIRECTOR B. AUTHORIZING OFFICIAL
NAME:

TITLE:

EMAIL:

PHONE:

ADDRESS:

,
NAME:

TITLE:

EMAIL:

PHONE:

ADDRESS:

,

(Signature) (Date) (Signature) (Date)

C. FISCAL OFFICIAL

D. AUTHORIZING OFFICIAL OF OFFICE OF TRAFFIC SAFETY
NAME:

TITLE:

EMAIL:

PHONE:

ADDRESS:

,
NAME:

TITLE:

EMAIL:

PHONE:

ADDRESS:

Barbara Rooney

Director

[email protected]

(916) 509-3030

2208 Kausen Drive, Suite 300
Elk Grove, CA 95758

(Signature) (Date) (Signature) (Date)

7.b
Packet Pg. 270
Attachment: Exhibit A Grant Agreement FY23 (Acceptance of an Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) Selective Traffic Enforcement Program (STEP)

8/18/2022 11:39:03 AM Page 2 of 14

10. PROJECTED EXPENDITURES
FUND CFDA ITEM/APPROPRIATION F.Y. CHAPTER STATUTE PROJECTED

EXPENDITURES

AGREEMENT
TOTAL $75,000.00

AMOUNT ENCUMBERED BY THIS DOCUMENT
I CERTIFY upon my own personal knowledge that the budgeted funds for the current budget year are available for the period and purpose of the expenditure stated above.
$75,000.00

PRIOR AMOUNT ENCUMBERED FOR THIS

AGREEMENT
$ 0.00
OTS ACCOUNTING OFFICER’S SIGNATURE DATE SIGNED TOTAL AMOUNT ENCUMBERED TO DATE $75,000.00

E. ACCOUNTING OFFICER OF OFFICE OF TRAFFIC SAFETY 9. SAM INFORMATION NAME: Carolyn Vu

SAM #:

REGISTERED
ADDRESS:

CITY:

ZIP+4:

J632Y14ENJQ9

70 N 1ST ST

CAMPBELL
95008-1460
ADDRESS: 2208 Kausen Drive, Suite 300

Elk Grove, CA 95758

7.b
Packet Pg. 271
Attachment: Exhibit A Grant Agreement FY23 (Acceptance of an Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) Selective Traffic Enforcement Program (STEP)

8/18/2022 11:39:03 AM Page 3 of 14

State of California – Office of Traffic Safety

GRANT AGREEMENT
Schedule A

GRANT NUMBER
PT23014

1. PROBLEM STATEMENT
The Campbell Police Department is working to improve traffic safety by participating in publicized traffic enforcement campaigns, training officers in impairment detection, and conducting highly visible DUI and traffic enforcement operations.

Due to a significant decline in staffing in 2018, the department’s traffic division had been reduced to one full- time officer, who also fills a supervisory role, greatly limiting the ability to properly investigate traffic crashes and conduct traffic enforcement, coupled with increases in injury crashes in the last few years. The supervisor additionally runs our crossing guard program and Major Accident Investigations Team (MAIT). The traffic division continues to be forced to augment its staffing by enlisting help from the patrol division for assistance in major crash investigations, conducting traffic and DUI enforcement, and taking away time from their existing duties. The officers spend prolonged periods of time at the crash scenes conducting road closure duty while the traffic team investigates the crash.

With a population of over 42,000 people, and being nestled next to San Jose, the most populous city in Northern California, the City of Campbell faces daily traffic challenges due to the limited enforcement and high traffic volumes. This was further exacerbated in January 2018 when the Campbell Police Department took over traffic responsibility of the San Tomas Expressway, which was previously serviced by contract agreement with CHP. The San Tomas Expressway is composed of three lanes in each direction and runs directly through Campbell. The approximate 2.4 miles of the expressway is a heavily commuted route with HOV lanes and serves as a major thoroughfare.

The department's limited staffing has greatly impacted traffic enforcement and as evident in our traffic data from 2019 to 2021, alcohol-involved injury crashes have doubled since 2019, tripling the number of injured victims. This is a major concern for the agency. The department intends to address these concerns by implementing increased enforcement, specifically between the hours of 10 PM to 3 AM, including holidays with an increased risk of DUI crashes.

2. PERFORMANCE MEASURES
A. Goals:

1. Reduce the number of persons killed in traffic crashes.

2. Reduce the number of persons injured in traffic crashes.

3. Reduce the number of pedestrians killed in traffic crashes.

4. Reduce the number of pedestrians injured in traffic crashes.

5. Reduce the number of bicyclists killed in traffic crashes.

6. Reduce the number of bicyclists injured in traffic crashes.

7. Reduce the number of persons killed in alcohol-involved crashes.

8. Reduce the number of persons injured in alcohol-involved crashes.

9. Reduce the number of persons killed in drug-involved crashes.

10. Reduce the number of persons injured in drug-involved crashes.

11. Reduce the number of persons killed in alcohol/drug combo-involved crashes.

12. Reduce the number of persons injured in alcohol/drug combo-involved crashes.

13. Reduce the number of motorcyclists killed in traffic crashes.

14. Reduce the number of motorcyclists injured in traffic crashes.

15. Reduce hit & run fatal crashes.

16. Reduce hit & run injury crashes.

17. Reduce nighttime (2100 - 0259 hours) fatal crashes.

18. Reduce nighttime (2100 - 0259 hours) injury crashes.

B. Objectives: Target Number

1. Issue a press release announcing the kick-off of the grant by November 15. The kick-off press releases and media advisories, alerts, and materials must be emailed to the OTS Public Information Officer at [email protected], and copied to 1 7.b
Packet Pg. 272
Attachment: Exhibit A Grant Agreement FY23 (Acceptance of an Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) Selective Traffic Enforcement Program (STEP)

8/18/2022 11:39:03 AM Page 4 of 14

your OTS Coordinator, for approval 14 days prior to the issuance date of the release.

2. Participate and report data (as required) in the following campaigns; Quarter 1:

National Walk to School Day, National Teen Driver Safety Week, NHTSA Winter Mobilization; Quarter 3: National Distracted Driving Awareness Month, National Motorcycle Safety Month, National Bicycle Safety Month, National Click it or Ticket Mobilization; Quarter 4: NHTSA Summer Mobilization, National Child Passenger Safety Week, and California's Pedestrian Safety Month.
10 3. Develop (by December 31) and/or maintain a “DUI BOLO” program to notify patrol and traffic officers to be on the lookout for identified repeat DUI offenders with a suspended or revoked license as a result of DUI convictions. Updated DUI BOLOs should be distributed to patrol and traffic officers monthly. 12 4. Send law enforcement personnel to the NHTSA Standardized Field Sobriety Testing (SFST) (minimum 16 hours) POST-certified training. 4 5. Send law enforcement personnel to the NHTSA Advanced Roadside Impaired Driving Enforcement (ARIDE) 16 hour POST-certified training. 4 6. Send law enforcement personnel to the Drug Recognition Expert (DRE) training. 2

7. Send law enforcement personnel to the DRE Recertification training. 1

8. Conduct DUI Saturation Patrol operation(s). 13

9. Conduct Warrant Service operation(s) targeting multiple DUI offenders who fail to appear in court.
1 10. Conduct Stakeout operation(s) that employ police officers to observe the "worst of the worst" repeat DUI offender probationers with suspended or revoked driver licenses.
1 11. Conduct Traffic Enforcement operation(s), including but not limited to, primary crash factor violations.
6 12. Conduct highly publicized Distracted Driving enforcement operation(s) targeting drivers using hand held cell phones and texting.
2 13. Conduct Nighttime (1800-0559) Click It or Ticket enforcement operation(s). 1

14. Conduct highly publicized pedestrian and/or bicycle enforcement operation(s) in areas or during events with a high number of pedestrian and/or bicycle crashes resulting from violations made by pedestrians, bicyclists, and drivers. 2 15. Conduct Traffic Safety educational presentation(s) with an effort to reach community members. Note: Presentation(s) may include topics such as distracted driving, DUI, speed, bicycle and pedestrian safety, seat belts and child passenger safety.
5 16. Participate in highly visible collaborative DUI Enforcement operations. 2

17. Participate in highly visible collaborative Traffic Enforcement operations. 2

18. Send law enforcement personnel to DUI Checkpoint Planning and Management training.
1 19. Conduct specialized enforcement operations focusing specifically on street racing and sideshow activities.
2 3. METHOD OF PROCEDURE
A. Phase 1 – Program Preparation (1st Quarter of Grant Year)  The department will develop operational plans to implement the “best practice” strategies outlined in the objectives section.
 All training needed to implement the program should be conducted this quarter.  All grant related purchases needed to implement the program should be made this quarter.  In order to develop/maintain the “DUI BOLOs,” research will be conducted to identify the “worst of the worst” repeat DUI offenders with a suspended or revoked license as a result of DUI convictions. The Hot Sheets may include the driver’s name, last known address, DOB, description, current license status, and the number of times suspended or revoked for DUI. DUI BOLOs should be updated and distributed to traffic and patrol officers at least monthly.  Implementation of the STEP grant activities will be accomplished by deploying personnel at high crash locations.

7.b
Packet Pg. 273
Attachment: Exhibit A Grant Agreement FY23 (Acceptance of an Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) Selective Traffic Enforcement Program (STEP)

8/18/2022 11:39:03 AM Page 5 of 14

 Media RequirementsIssue a press release approved by the OTS PIO announcing the kick-off of the grant by November 15, but no sooner than October 1. The kick-off release must be approved by the OTS PIO and only distributed after the grant is fully signed and executed. If you are unable to meet the November 15 deadline to issue a kick-off press release, communicate reasons to your OTS coordinator and OTS PIO.

B. Phase 2 – Program Operations (Throughout Grant Year)  The department will work to create media opportunities throughout the grant period to call attention to the innovative program strategies and outcomes.

Media Requirements

The following requirements are for all grant-related activities:
 Send all media advisories, alerts, videos, graphics, artwork, posters, radio/PSA/video scripts, storyboards, digital and/or print educational materials for grant-related activities to the OTS PIO at [email protected] for approval and copy your OTS coordinator. Optimum lead time would be 7 days before the scheduled release but at least 3 business days prior to the scheduled release date for review and approval is appreciated.
 The OTS PIO is responsible for the approval of the design and content of materials. The agency understands OTS PIO approval is not authorizing approval of budget expenditure or cost. Any cost approvals must come from the Coordinator.
 Pre-approval is not required when using any OTS-supplied template for media advisories, press releases, social media graphics, videos or posts, or any other OTS-supplied educational material.

However, copy the OTS PIO at [email protected] and your OTS coordinator when any material is distributed to the media and public, such as a press release, educational material, or link to social media post. The OTS-supplied kick-off press release templates and any kickoff press releases are an exception to this policy and require prior approval before distribution to the media and public.
 If an OTS-supplied template, educational material, social media graphic, post or video is substantially changed, the changes shall be sent to the OTS PIO at [email protected] for approval and copy to your OTS Coordinator. Optimum lead time would be 7 days prior to the scheduled release date, but at least 3 business days prior to the scheduled release date for review and approval is appreciated.
 Press releases, social media posts and alerts on platforms such as NextDoor and Nixle reporting immediate and time-sensitive grant activities (e.g. enforcement operations, day of event highlights or announcements, event invites) are exempt from the OTS PIO approval process. The OTS PIO and your Coordinator should still be notified when the grant-related activity is happening (e.g. car seat checks, bicycle rodeos, community presentations, DUI checkpoints, etc.).
 Enforcement activities such as warrant and probation sweeps, court stings, etc. that are embargoed or could impact operations by publicizing in advance are exempt from the PIO approval process. However, announcements and results of activities should still be copied to the OTS PIO at [email protected] and your Coordinator with embargoed date and time or with “INTERNAL ONLY: DO NOT RELEASE” message in subject line of email.  Any earned or paid media campaigns for TV, radio, digital or social media that are part of a specific grant objective, using OTS grant funds, or designed and developed using contractual services by a subgrantee, requires prior approval. Please send to the OTS PIO at [email protected] for approval and copy your grant coordinator at least 3 business days prior to the scheduled release date.
 Social media posts highlighting state or national traffic safety campaigns (Distracted Driving Month, Motorcycle Safety Awareness Month, etc.), enforcement operations (DUI checkpoints, etc.), or any other grant-related activity such as Bicycle rodeos, presentations, or events, are highly encouraged but do not require prior approval.
 Submit a draft or rough-cut of all digital, printed, recorded or video material (brochures, posters, scripts, artwork, trailer graphics, digital graphics, social posts connected to an earned or paid media campaign grant objective) to the OTS PIO at [email protected] and copy your OTS Coordinator for approval prior to the production or duplication.

7.b
Packet Pg. 274
Attachment: Exhibit A Grant Agreement FY23 (Acceptance of an Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) Selective Traffic Enforcement Program (STEP)

8/18/2022 11:39:03 AM Page 6 of 14

 Use the following standard language in all press, media, and printed materials, space permitting:

Funding for this program was provided by a grant from the California Office of Traffic Safety, through the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.  Space permitting, include the OTS logo on all grant-funded print materials, graphics and paid or earned social media campaign grant objective; consult your OTS Coordinator for specifics, format-appropriate logos, or if space does not permit the use of the OTS logo.  Email the OTS PIO at [email protected] and copy your OTS Coordinator at least 21 days in advance, or when first confirmed, a short description of any significant grant-related traffic safety event or program, particularly events that are highly publicized beforehand with anticipated media coverage so OTS has sufficient notice to arrange for attendance and/or participation in the event.

If unable to attend, email the OTS PIO and coordinator brief highlights and/or results, including any media coverage (broadcast, digital, print) of event within 7 days following significant grant- related event or program. Media and program highlights are to be reflected in QPRs.  Any press releases, work plans, scripts, storyboards, artwork, graphics, videos or any educational or informational materials that received PIO approval in a prior grant year needs to be resubmitted for approval in the current grant year.
 Contact the OTS PIO or your OTS Coordinator for consultation when changes from any of the above requirements might be warranted.

C. Phase 3 – Data Collection & Reporting (Throughout Grant Year)

1. Prepare and submit invoice claims (due January 30, April 30, July 30, and October 30)

2. Prepare and submit Quarterly Performance Reports (QPR) (due January 30, April 30, July 30, and October 30)
 Collect and report quarterly, appropriate data that supports the progress of goals and objectives.  Provide a brief list of activity conducted, procurement of grant-funded items, and significant media activities. Include status of grant-funded personnel, status of contracts, challenges, or special accomplishments.
 Provide a brief summary of quarterly accomplishments and explanations for objectives not completed or plans for upcoming activities.
 Collect, analyze and report statistical data relating to the grant goals and objectives.

4. METHOD OF EVALUATION
Using the data compiled during the grant, the Grant Director will complete the “Final Evaluation” section in the fourth/final Quarterly Performance Report (QPR). The Final Evaluation should provide a brief summary of the grant’s accomplishments, challenges and significant activities. This narrative should also include whether goals and objectives were met, exceeded, or an explanation of why objectives were not completed.

5. ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT
This program has full administrative support, and every effort will be made to continue the grant activities after grant conclusion.

7.b
Packet Pg. 275
Attachment: Exhibit A Grant Agreement FY23 (Acceptance of an Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) Selective Traffic Enforcement Program (STEP)

8/18/2022 11:39:03 AM Page 7 of 14

State of California – Office of Traffic Safety

GRANT AGREEMENT
Schedule B

GRANT NUMBER
PT23014

FUND NUMBER CATALOG

NUMBER (CFDA)

FUND DESCRIPTION TOTAL AMOUNT
164AL-23 20.608 Minimum Penalties for Repeat
Offenders for Driving While
Intoxicated
$40,000.00
402PT-23 20.600 State and Community Highway
Safety
$35,000.00

COST CATEGORY FUND
NUMBER

UNIT COST OR
RATE

UNITS TOTAL COST TO
GRANT
A. PERSONNEL COSTS

Straight Time
$0.00
Overtime
DUI Saturation Patrols 164AL-23 $2,800.00 13 $36,400.00 Warrant Service Operations 164AL-23 $1,175.00 1 $1,175.00 Stakeouts 164AL-23 $1,175.00 1 $1,175.00
Collaborative DUI Enforcement 164AL-23 $625.00 2 $1,250.00 Traffic Enforcement 402PT-23 $2,300.00 6 $13,800.00
Distracted Driving 402PT-23 $1,150.00 2 $2,300.00
Night-time Click It Or Ticket 402PT-23 $1,150.00 1 $1,150.00 Pedestrian and Bicycle Enforcement 402PT-23 $1,150.00 2 $2,300.00 Street Racing and Sideshow Enforcement
Operations
402PT-23 $3,100.00 2 $6,200.00
Collaborative Traffic Enforcement 402PT-23 $575.00 2 $1,150.00 Traffic Safety Education 402PT-23 $685.00 5 $3,425.00
Category Sub-Total $70,325.00
B. TRAVEL EXPENSES
In State Travel 402PT-23 $4,675.00 1 $4,675.00
$0.00
Category Sub-Total $4,675.00
C. CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
$0.00
Category Sub-Total $0.00
D. EQUIPMENT
$0.00
Category Sub-Total $0.00
E. OTHER DIRECT COSTS
$0.00
Category Sub-Total $0.00
F. INDIRECT COSTS
$0.00
Category Sub-Total $0.00
GRANT TOTAL $75,000.00

7.b
Packet Pg. 276
Attachment: Exhibit A Grant Agreement FY23 (Acceptance of an Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) Selective Traffic Enforcement Program (STEP)

8/18/2022 11:39:03 AM Page 8 of 14

State of California – Office of Traffic Safety

GRANT AGREEMENT
Schedule B-1

GRANT NUMBER
PT23014

BUDGET NARRATIVE

PERSONNEL COSTS
DUI Saturation Patrols - Overtime for grant funded law enforcement operations conducted by appropriate department personnel.

Warrant Service Operations - Overtime for grant funded law enforcement operations conducted by appropriate department personnel.

Stakeouts - Overtime for grant funded law enforcement operations conducted by appropriate department personnel.

Collaborative DUI Enforcement - Overtime for grant funded Collaborative DUI Enforcement operations conducted by appropriate department personnel
Traffic Enforcement - Overtime for grant funded law enforcement operations conducted by appropriate department personnel.

Distracted Driving - Overtime for grant funded law enforcement operations conducted by appropriate department personnel.

Night-time Click It Or Ticket - Overtime for grant funded law enforcement operations conducted by appropriate department personnel.

Pedestrian and Bicycle Enforcement - Overtime for grant funded law enforcement operations conducted by appropriate department personnel.

Street Racing and Sideshow Enforcement Operations - Overtime for grant funded law enforcement operations conducted by appropriate department personnel.

Collaborative Traffic Enforcement - Overtime for grant funded Collaborative Traffic Enforcement operations conducted by appropriate department personnel
Traffic Safety Education - Overtime for grant funded traffic safety presentations or campaigns conducted by appropriate department personnel.

TRAVEL EXPENSES
In State Travel - Costs are included for appropriate staff to attend conferences and training events supporting the grant goals and objectives and/or traffic safety. Local mileage for grant activities and meetings is included. All conferences, seminars or training not specifically identified in the Budget Narrative must be approved by OTS. All travel claimed must be at the agency approved rate. Per Diem may not be claimed for meals provided at conferences when registration fees are paid with OTS grant funds.

CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
-

EQUIPMENT
-

OTHER DIRECT COSTS
-

INDIRECT COSTS
-

STATEMENTS/DISCLAIMERS
There will be no program income generated from this grant.

Nothing in this “agreement” shall be interpreted as a requirement, formal or informal, that a particular law enforcement officer issue a specified or predetermined number of citations in pursuance of the goals and objectives here under.

7.b
Packet Pg. 277
Attachment: Exhibit A Grant Agreement FY23 (Acceptance of an Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) Selective Traffic Enforcement Program (STEP)

8/18/2022 11:39:03 AM Page 9 of 14

State of California – Office of Traffic Safety

GRANT AGREEMENT
Exhibit A

GRANT NUMBER
PT23014

CERTIFICATIONS AND ASSURANCES FOR HIGHWAY SAFETY GRANTS (23 U.S.C. Chapter 4; Sec. 1906, Pub. L. 109-59, As Amended By Sec. 4011, Pub. L. 114-94)

The officials named on the grant agreement, certify by way of signature on the grant agreement signature page, that the Grantee Agency complies with all applicable Federal statutes, regulations, and directives and State rules, guidelines, policies, and laws in effect with respect to the periods for which it receives grant funding.

Applicable provisions include, but are not limited to, the following:

GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
 23 U.S.C. Chapter 4 – Highway Safety Act of 1966, as amended  Sec. 1906, Pub. L. 109-59, as amended by Sec. 4011, Pub. L. 114-94  23 CFR part 1300 – Uniform Procedures for State Highway Safety Grant Programs  2 CFR part 200 – Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards
 2 CFR part 1201 – Department of Transportation, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards

NONDISCRIMINATION
(applies to all subrecipients as well as States)
The State highway safety agency will comply with all Federal statutes and implementing regulations relating to nondiscrimination (“Federal Nondiscrimination Authorities”). These include but are not limited to:
 Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000d et seq., 78 stat. 252), (prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin) and 49 CFR part 21;  The Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, (42 U.S.C. 4601), (prohibits unfair treatment of persons displaced or whose property has been acquired because of Federal or Federal-aid programs and projects);  Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1973, (23 U.S.C. 324 et seq.), and Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, as amended (20 U.S.C. 1681-1683 and 1685-1686) (prohibit discrimination on the basis of sex);
 Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, (29 U.S.C. 794 et seq.), as amended, (prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability) and 49 CFR part 27;  The Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended, (42 U.S.C. 6101 et seq.), (prohibits discrimination on the basis of age);
 The Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987, (Pub. L. 100-209), (broadens scope, coverage and applicability of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, The Age Discrimination Act of 1975 and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, by expanding the definition of the terms "programs or activities" to include all of the programs or activities of the Federal aid recipients, subrecipients and contractors, whether such programs or activities are Federally-funded or not);
 Titles II and III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (42 U.S.C. 12131-12189) (prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability in the operation of public entities, public and private transportation systems, places of public accommodation, and certain testing) and 49 CFR parts 37 and 38;
 Executive Order 12898, Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations (prevents discrimination against minority populations by discouraging programs, policies, and activities with disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental effects on minority and low-income populations); and  Executive Order 13166, Improving Access to Services for Persons with Limited English Proficiency (guards against Title VI national origin discrimination/discrimination because of limited English proficiency (LEP) by ensuring that funding recipients take reasonable steps to ensure that LEP persons have meaningful access to programs (70 FR 74087-74100).

The Subgrantee-

7.b
Packet Pg. 278
Attachment: Exhibit A Grant Agreement FY23 (Acceptance of an Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) Selective Traffic Enforcement Program (STEP)

8/18/2022 11:39:03 AM Page 10 of 14

 Will take all measures necessary to ensure that no person in the United States shall, on the grounds of race, color, national origin, disability, sex, age, limited English proficiency, or membership in any other class protected by Federal Nondiscrimination Authorities, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination under any of its programs or activities, so long as any portion of the program is Federally-assisted;  Will administer the program in a manner that reasonably ensures that any of its subrecipients, contractors, subcontractors, and consultants receiving Federal financial assistance under this program will comply with all requirements of the Non- Discrimination Authorities identified in this Assurance;
 Agrees to comply (and require its subrecipients, contractors, subcontractors, and consultants to comply) with all applicable provisions of law or regulation governing US DOT’s or NHTSA’s access to records, accounts, documents, information, facilities, and staff, and to cooperate and comply with any program or compliance reviews, and/or complaint investigations conducted by US DOT or NHTSA under any Federal Nondiscrimination Authority;
 Acknowledges that the United States has a right to seek judicial enforcement with regard to any matter arising under these Non-Discrimination Authorities and this Assurance;  Agrees to insert in all contracts and funding agreements with other State or private entities the following clause:
o “During the performance of this contract/funding agreement, the contractor/funding recipient agrees—

a. To comply with all Federal nondiscrimination laws and regulations, as may be amended from time to time;
b. Not to participate directly or indirectly in the discrimination prohibited by any Federal non- discrimination law or regulation, as set forth in appendix B of 49 CFR part 2l and herein; c. To permit access to its books, records, accounts, other sources of information, and its facilities as required by the State highway safety office, US DOT or NHTSA; d. That, in event a contractor/funding recipient fails to comply with any nondiscrimination provisions in this contract/funding agreement, the State highway safety agency will have the right to impose such contract/agreement sanctions as it or NHTSA determine are appropriate, including but not limited to withholding payments to the contractor/funding recipient under the contract/agreement until the contractor/funding recipient complies; and/or cancelling, terminating, or suspending a contract or funding agreement, in whole or in part; and
e. To insert this clause, including paragraphs (a) through (e), in every subcontract and subagreement and in every solicitation for a subcontract or sub-agreement, that receives Federal funds under this program.

THE DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE ACT OF 1988 (41 U.S.C. 8103)
The Subgrantee will provide a drug-free workplace by:
a. Publishing a statement notifying employees that the unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensing, possession or use of a controlled substance is prohibited in the grantee's workplace and specifying the actions that will be taken against employees for violation of such prohibition; b. Establishing a drug-free awareness program to inform employees about:

1. The dangers of drug abuse in the workplace;

2. The grantee's policy of maintaining a drug-free workplace;

3. Any available drug counseling, rehabilitation, and employee assistance programs;

4. The penalties that may be imposed upon employees for drug violations occurring in the workplace;

5. Making it a requirement that each employee engaged in the performance of the grant be given a copy of the statement required by paragraph (a); c. Notifying the employee in the statement required by paragraph (a) that, as a condition of employment under the grant, the employee will –

1. Abide by the terms of the statement;

2. Notify the employer of any criminal drug statute conviction for a violation occurring in the workplace no later than five days after such conviction; d. Notifying the agency within ten days after receiving notice under subparagraph (c)(2) from an

7.b
Packet Pg. 279
Attachment: Exhibit A Grant Agreement FY23 (Acceptance of an Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) Selective Traffic Enforcement Program (STEP)

8/18/2022 11:39:03 AM Page 11 of 14

employee or otherwise receiving actual notice of such conviction; e. Taking one of the following actions, within 30 days of receiving notice under subparagraph (c)(2), with respect to any employee who is so convicted –

1. Taking appropriate personnel action against such an employee, up to and including termination;

2. Requiring such employee to participate satisfactorily in a drug abuse assistance or rehabilitation program approved for such purposes by a Federal, State, or local health, law enforcement, or other appropriate agency;
f. Making a good faith effort to continue to maintain a drug-free workplace through implementation of all of the paragraphs above.

POLITICAL ACTIVITY (HATCH ACT)
(applies to all subrecipients as well as States)
The State will comply with provisions of the Hatch Act (5 U.S.C. 1501-1508), which limits the political activities of employees whose principal employment activities are funded in whole or in part with Federal funds.

CERTIFICATION REGARDING FEDERAL LOBBYING
(applies to all subrecipients as well as States)
Certification for Contracts, Grants, Loans, and Cooperative Agreements

The signed certifies, to the best of his or her knowledge and belief, that:

1. No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the undersigned, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any Federal contract, the making of any Federal grant, the making of any Federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement;

2. If any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, the undersigned shall complete and submit Standard Form-LLL, "Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying," in accordance with its instructions;

3. The undersigned shall require that the language of this certification be included in the award documents for all sub-award at all tiers (including subcontracts, subgrants, and contracts under grant, loans, and cooperative agreements) and that all subrecipients shall certify and disclose accordingly.

This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into this transaction imposed by section 1352, title 31, U.S. Code. Any person who fails to file the required certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure.

RESTRICTION ON STATE LOBBYING
(applies to all subrecipients as well as States)
None of the funds under this program will be used for any activity specifically designed to urge or influence a State or local legislator to favor or oppose the adoption of any specific legislative proposal pending before any State or local legislative body. Such activities include both direct and indirect (e.g., "grassroots") lobbying activities, with one exception. This does not preclude a State official whose salary is supported with NHTSA funds from engaging in direct communications with State or local legislative officials, in accordance with customary State practice, even if such communications urge legislative officials to favor or oppose the adoption of a specific pending legislative proposal.

CERTIFICATION REGARDING DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION
(applies to all subrecipients as well as States)

7.b
Packet Pg. 280
Attachment: Exhibit A Grant Agreement FY23 (Acceptance of an Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) Selective Traffic Enforcement Program (STEP)

8/18/2022 11:39:03 AM Page 12 of 14

Instructions for Primary Tier Participant Certification (States)

1. By signing and submitting this proposal, the prospective primary tier participant is providing the certification set out below and agrees to comply with the requirements of 2 CFR parts 180 and 1200.

2. The inability of a person to provide the certification required below will not necessarily result in denial of participation in this covered transaction. The prospective primary tier participant shall submit an explanation of why it cannot provide the certification set out below. The certification or explanation will be considered in connection with the department or agency's determination whether to enter into this transaction. However, failure of the prospective primary tier participant to furnish a certification or an explanation shall disqualify such person from participation in this transaction.

3. The certification in this clause is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when the department or agency determined to enter into this transaction. If it is later determined that the prospective primary tier participant knowingly rendered an erroneous certification, in addition to other remedies available to the Federal Government, the department or agency may terminate this transaction for cause or default or may pursue suspension or debarment.

4. The prospective primary tier participant shall provide immediate written notice to the department or agency to which this proposal is submitted if at any time the prospective primary tier participant learns its certification was erroneous when submitted or has become erroneous by reason of changed circumstances.

5. The terms covered transaction, civil judgment, debarment, suspension, ineligible, participant, person, principal, and voluntarily excluded, as used in this clause, are defined in 2 CFR parts 180 and 1200.

You may contact the department or agency to which this proposal is being submitted for assistance in obtaining a copy of those regulations.

6. The prospective primary tier participant agrees by submitting this proposal that, should the proposed covered transaction be entered into, it shall not knowingly enter into any lower tier covered transaction with a person who is proposed for debarment under 48 CFR part 9, subpart 9.4, debarred, suspended, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this covered transaction, unless authorized by the department or agency entering into this transaction.

7. The prospective primary tier participant further agrees by submitting this proposal that it will include the clause titled “Instructions for Lower Tier Participant Certification” including the "Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion—Lower Tier Covered Transaction,” provided by the department or agency entering into this covered transaction, without modification, in all lower tier covered transactions and in all solicitations for lower tier covered transactions and will require lower tier participants to comply with 2 CFR parts 180 and 1200.

8. A participant in a covered transaction may rely upon a certification of a prospective participant in a lower tier covered transaction that it is not proposed for debarment under 48 CFR part 9, subpart 9.4, debarred, suspended, ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from the covered transaction, unless it knows that the certification is erroneous. A participant is responsible for ensuring that its principals are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise ineligible to participate in covered transactions. To verify the eligibility of its principals, as well as the eligibility of any prospective lower tier participants, each participant may, but is not required to, check the System for Award Management Exclusions website (https://www.sam.gov/).

9. Nothing contained in the foregoing shall be construed to require establishment of a system of records in order to render in good faith the certification required by this clause. The knowledge and information of a participant is not required to exceed that which is normally possessed by a prudent person in the ordinary course of business dealings.

10. Except for transactions authorized under paragraph 6 of these instructions, if a participant in a covered transaction knowingly enters into a lower tier covered transaction with a person who is proposed for debarment under 48 CFR part 9, subpart 9.4, suspended, debarred, ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this transaction, in addition to other remedies available to the Federal government, the department or agency may terminate the transaction for cause or default.

Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, and Other Responsibility Matters-Primary Tier Covered Transactions

(1) The prospective primary tier participant certifies to the best of its knowledge and belief, that it and its principals:
(a) Are not presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participating in covered transactions by any Federal department or agency; (b) Have not within a three-year period preceding this proposal been convicted of or had a civil judgment

7.b
Packet Pg. 281
Attachment: Exhibit A Grant Agreement FY23 (Acceptance of an Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) Selective Traffic Enforcement Program (STEP)

8/18/2022 11:39:03 AM Page 13 of 14

rendered against them for commission of fraud or a criminal offense in connection with obtaining, attempting to obtain, or performing a public (Federal, State or local) transaction or contract under a public transaction; violation of Federal or State antitrust statutes or commission of embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records, making false statements, or receiving stolen property; (c) Are not presently indicted for or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a governmental entity (Federal, State or Local) with commission of any of the offenses enumerated in paragraph (1)(b) of this certification; and
(d) Have not within a three-year period preceding this application/proposal had one or more public transactions (Federal, State, or local) terminated for cause or default.

(2) Where the prospective primary tier participant is unable to certify to any of the Statements in this certification, such prospective participant shall attach an explanation to this proposal.

Instructions for Lower Tier Participant Certification

1. By signing and submitting this proposal, the prospective lower tier participant is providing the certification set out below and agrees to comply with the requirements of 2 CFR parts 180 and 1200.

2. The certification in this clause is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was entered into. If it is later determined that the prospective lower tier participant knowingly rendered an erroneous certification, in addition to other remedies available to the Federal government, the department or agency with which this transaction originated may pursue available remedies, including suspension or debarment.

3. The prospective lower tier participant shall provide immediate written notice to the person to which this proposal is submitted if at any time the prospective lower tier participant learns that its certification was erroneous when submitted or has become erroneous by reason of changed circumstances.

4. The terms covered transaction, civil judgment, debarment, suspension, ineligible, participant, person, principal, and voluntarily excluded, as used in this clause, are defined in 2 CFR parts 180 and 1200.

You may contact the person to whom this proposal is submitted for assistance in obtaining a copy of those regulations.

5. The prospective lower tier participant agrees by submitting this proposal that, should the proposed covered transaction be entered into, it shall not knowingly enter into any lower tier covered transaction with a person who is proposed for debarment under 48 CFR part 9, subpart 9.4, debarred, suspended, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this covered transaction, unless authorized by the department or agency with which this transaction originated.

6. The prospective lower tier participant further agrees by submitting this proposal that it will include the clause titled “Instructions for Lower Tier Participant Certification” including the "Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion – Lower Tier Covered Transaction," without modification, in all lower tier covered transactions and in all solicitations for lower tier covered transactions and will require lower tier participants to comply with 2 CFR parts 180 and 1200.

7. A participant in a covered transaction may rely upon a certification of a prospective participant in a lower tier covered transaction that it is not proposed for debarment under 48 CFR part 9, subpart 9.4, debarred, suspended, ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from the covered transaction, unless it knows that the certification is erroneous. A participant is responsible for ensuring that its principals are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise ineligible to participate in covered transactions. To verify the eligibility of its principals, as well as the eligibility of any prospective lower tier participants, each participant may, but is not required to, check the System for Award Management Exclusions website (https://www.sam.gov/).

8. Nothing contained in the foregoing shall be construed to require establishment of a system of records in order to render in good faith the certification required by this clause. The knowledge and information of a participant is not required to exceed that which is normally possessed by a prudent person in the ordinary course of business dealings.

9. Except for transactions authorized under paragraph 5 of these instructions, if a participant in a covered transaction knowingly enters into a lower tier covered transaction with a person who is proposed for debarment under 48 CFR part 9, subpart 9.4, suspended, debarred, ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this transaction, in addition to other remedies available to the Federal government, the department or agency with which this transaction originated may pursue available remedies, including suspension or debarment.

7.b
Packet Pg. 282
Attachment: Exhibit A Grant Agreement FY23 (Acceptance of an Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) Selective Traffic Enforcement Program (STEP)

8/18/2022 11:39:03 AM Page 14 of 14

Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion -- Lower Tier Covered Transactions:

1. The prospective lower tier participant certifies, by submission of this proposal, that neither it nor its principals is presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participating in covered transactions by any Federal department or agency.

2. Where the prospective lower tier participant is unable to certify to any of the statements in this certification, such prospective participant shall attach an explanation to this proposal.

BUY AMERICA ACT
(applies to all subrecipients as well as States)
The State and each subrecipient will comply with the Buy America requirement (23 U.S.C. 313) when purchasing items using Federal funds. Buy America requires a State, or subrecipient, to purchase with Federal funds only steel, iron and manufactured products produced in the United States, unless the Secretary of Transportation determines that such domestically produced items would be inconsistent with the public interest, that such materials are not reasonably available and of a satisfactory quality, or that inclusion of domestic materials will increase the cost of the overall project contract by more than 25 percent. In order to use Federal funds to purchase foreign produced items, the State must submit a waiver request that provides an adequate basis and justification for approval by the Secretary of Transportation.

PROHIBITION ON USING GRANT FUNDS TO CHECK FOR HELMET USAGE (applies to all subrecipients as well as States)
The State and each subrecipient will not use 23 U.S.C. Chapter 4 grant funds for programs to check helmet usage or to create checkpoints that specifically target motorcyclists.

POLICY ON SEAT BELT USE
In accordance with Executive Order 13043, Increasing Seat Belt Use in the United States, dated April 16, 1997, the Grantee is encouraged to adopt and enforce on-the-job seat belt use policies and programs for its employees when operating company-owned, rented, or personally-owned vehicles. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is responsible for providing leadership and guidance in support of this Presidential initiative. For information and resources on traffic safety programs and policies for employers, please contact the Network of Employers for Traffic Safety (NETS), a public-private partnership dedicated to improving the traffic safety practices of employers and employees. You can download information on seat belt programs, costs of motor vehicle crashes to employers, and other traffic safety initiatives at www.trafficsafety.org. The NHTSA website (www.nhtsa.gov) also provides information on statistics, campaigns, and program evaluations and references.

POLICY ON BANNING TEXT MESSAGING WHILE DRIVING
In accordance with Executive Order 13513, Federal Leadership On Reducing Text Messaging While Driving, and DOT Order 3902.10, Text Messaging While Driving, States are encouraged to adopt and enforce workplace safety policies to decrease crashes caused by distracted driving, including policies to ban text messaging while driving company-owned or rented vehicles, Government-owned, leased or rented vehicles, or privately-owned vehicles when on official Government business or when performing any work on or behalf of the Government. States are also encouraged to conduct workplace safety initiatives in a manner commensurate with the size of the business, such as establishment of new rules and programs or re- evaluation of existing programs to prohibit text messaging while driving, and education, awareness, and other outreach to employees about the safety risks associated with texting while driving.

7.b
Packet Pg. 283
Attachment: Exhibit A Grant Agreement FY23 (Acceptance of an Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) Selective Traffic Enforcement Program (STEP) City of Campbell
Request for Budget Adjustments
Department/Program Division Date Request No.

November 1, 2022 BA-8
Budget to be Reduced
Fund/Program Account Number Description Amount
Budget to be Increased
Fund/Program Account Number Description Amount

REVENUES
101.539 4543 OTS Grant Revenue - Other State Grants 75,000

EXPENDITURES
101.604 7003 OTS Grant Related - Reimbursable Overtime 75,000 REASON FOR REQUEST - BE SPECIFIC:

Finance Director Police Chief City Manager
Police
Will Fuentes Gary Berg Brian Loventhal
To recognize OTS grant revenue and related grant expenditures. 604 - Special Enforcement

7.c
Packet Pg. 284
Attachment: Exhibit B Budget Adjustment Form (Acceptance of an Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) Selective Traffic Enforcement Program (STEP)

City
Council
Report

TITLE: Multi-Family Development and Design Standards and Key Considerations Related to the Mapping of Walkable and Auto - Oriented Neighborhoods, Establishment o f Off -Street Parking Requirements, and the Development of Site Development and Design Standards, to be Addressed as Part of the Update (File No.: PLN - 2022-90).

RECOMMENDED ACTION

That the City Council receive the report and provide direction to staff on the mapping of walkable and auto -oriented neighborhoods, establishment of off -street parking requirements, and the development of site development and design standards.

PURPOSE
The purpose of this item is to solicit direction on key areas to support devel opment of the Multi -Family Development and Design Standards (“Design Standards”) under development. These standards include mapping of walkable and auto -oriented neighborhoods, establishment of off -street parking requirements, and the development of site development and design standards.

BACKGROUND
On August 17, 2022 , the City Council received a ‘Kick -Off’ report on the subject item, provided guidance on key aspects of the work plan and established four guiding principles (i.e., Keep it Simple, Keep it Focused, Keep it Engaging, and Keep it Moving) to ensure the scope of work remains focused on priorities and is completed on time.

On August 23, 2022 , the Planning Commission received the same ‘Kick -Off’ presentation presented to the Council on August 17, 2022, as well as a summary of Council direction from the meeting. At the meeting, the Planning Commission appointed Commissioners Buchbinder and Kamkar to serve on an Ad -Hoc Subcommittee which will help research topic areas of interest – such as best practices related to parking standards.

On August 24, 2022 , staff held its first Community Meeting, and on August 26, 2022 , staff held its first Developer’s Roundtable Meeting, serving to educate and eng age the Item: 8
Category: UNFINISHED BUSINESS
Meeting Date: November 15, 2022
8 Packet Pg. 285
Multi-Family Development and Design Standards (PLN-2022-90) Page 2 of 26 community in the process and obtain initial feedback regarding development of the standards.

On September 20, 2022 , the City Council received a progress update on the Multi - Family Residential Development and Design Standards, where staff identified the proposal to conduct an informational joint study session between the City Council and the Planning Commission.

On September 28, 2022 , staff held its second Developer’s Roundtable Meeting.

Approximately 50 participants were in attendance. The purpose of this Developer’s Roundtable was to present the ap proach used to apply the Design standards to a sample housing development and to solicit feedback from the development community on the changes under consideration.

On November 1, 2022 , a joint study session was held with the City Council and Planning Commission to provide an informational briefing on the work plan effort. The meeting reiterated key objectives of the update, and explained core concepts, terminology, and methodology being used to develop new standards. A summary of new housing bills ( AB 2097 and AB 2011/SB 6) affecting this planning effort was also provided.

On November 8, 2022 , the Planning Commission received a report on the same discussion points covered in this report. Feedback received from the Planning Commission will be provided as a desk item in advance of the public me eting and summarized in the staff presentation.

DISCUSSION
The following discussion is organized into five sections which serve to inform and solicit initial feedback on topics critical to the development of the Design Standards. These include: 1) the ma pping of walkable and auto -oriented neighborhoods; 2) off -street parking requirements; 3) regulation of design standards, 4) standards to address adjacency and context; and 5) standards for the development of large sites.

The feedback provided on these s ubjects will help development of the standards covered in Phases 2, 3, and 4 of the update process, as discussed with the Commission and Council at the November 1, 2022, Joint Study Session.

8 Packet Pg. 286
Multi-Family Development and Design Standards (PLN-2022-90) Page 3 of 26

Figure 1: Subject Meeting Topics & Related Project Phases

Based on feedback and direction from the Planning Commission and City Council, staff and the consultant will prepare an Administrative Draft of the Design Standards discussed in this report for review early next year (see ‘Schedule / Next Steps’).

1) Walkable & Drivable Areas Map

The City’s existing land use policies are organized by distinctions in land use as opposed to physical form. As part of the update, the City will incorporate a “form -based” approach as the primary organizing principle for the developme nt of new housing development. In developing a form -based code, the City will prepare a map of form - based zones (i.e., T-3, T-4, as discussed in the November 1, 2022, Joint Study Session Report) to identify where specific standards apply.

Based on the fe edback provided on this topic, staff and the consultant will begin preparing this mapping which includes assigning building standards related to walkability (i.e., frontage types, reduced parking standards) the associated form -based zones throughout the city.

Figure 2: Relationship of General Plan, Zoning, & Form-Based Zone Map

As a first step in the mapping process, the City identifies neighborhoods as either “walkable” or “drivable (auto-oriented)” using the following criteria as a guide.

8 Packet Pg. 287
Multi-Family Development and Design Standards (PLN-2022-90) Page 4 of 26 • “Walkable areas” are highly interconnected to other areas and built to support pedestrian activity, including recreational purposes, and walking to destinations within a short distance (approximately 5 minutes) such as work, transit, errands, shopping, or restauran ts. As a result, walkable areas generally include building forms with the following characteristics:
o The building’s ground floor is engaging with the street through building entries and outdoor areas near the sidewalk
o Wider sidewalks and fewer curb cuts
o Lower parking requirements
o Parking that is not between the sidewalk and the buildings

An example of a walkable area is Campbell’s downtown area, where the street pattern (e.g., grid streets small blocks, and ease of pedestrian movement), ground floor treatment of buildings (e.g., a variety of storefronts, buildings closer to the sidewalk), and a variety of amenities (e.g., restaurants, shopping, transit) all contribute to the walkability of the area.

• “Drivable ( Auto-oriented) areas ” are centered around t he automobile and development is built to prioritize and accommodate the automobile as the priority with pedestrians as secondary. As a result, auto -oriented areas generally have building forms with the following characteristics:
o Buildings oriented toward parking, as opposed to the sidewalk or street o Reduced sidewalk widths
o More parking
o Parking that is placed between the sidewalk and the buildings

An example of an auto -oriented area is the San Tomas area of Campbell, where most activities require driving.

In preparation of a Draft Walkable & Drivable Areas Map, policy guidance from the City’s various planning documents (i.e., Area / Neighborhood Plans) as well as analysis of the built environment completed as part of Phase 1 (Existing Conditions Analysi s) were considered.

The Draft Walkable & Drivable Areas Map includes three key categories: 1) Walkable areas; 2) Drivable (Auto -Oriented) areas, and 3) Potentially Walkable areas (for areas having characteristics of both).

8 Packet Pg. 288
Multi-Family Development and Design Standards (PLN-2022-90) Page 5 of 26

Figure 3: Walkable, Potentially Walkable, and Drivable (Auto-Oriented) Areas Staff is soliciting Commission and Council feedback on three areas identified as “Potentially Walkable”, indicated in light pink on the map, to determine if they should be mapped as “Walkable” or “Drivable” as discussed below:

Northwest Campbell (Area 1) : The first of the three areas identified includes the San Tomas Aquino Plaza Shopping Center, and properties in the surrounding area including those located south of the Kirkwood Plaza Shopping Center. This area generally has excellent access to services (i.e., grocery stores, restaurants, daycare, fitness facilities) but limited access to public transit. By defining this area as walkable, future development of the area will be oriented toward establishing a pedestrian-oriented, particularly for larger development sites such as the San Tomas Aquino Plaza Shopping Center.

Figure 4: Northwest Campbell (Potentially Walkable Areas) 8 Packet Pg. 289
Multi-Family Development and Design Standards (PLN-2022-90) Page 6 of 26

North Central Campbell (Area 2) : The second area warranting discussion inclu des Alvin’s Corner at Penny Lane, the former Culinary Arts Center/Golds Gym, the Safeway Shopping Center on Hamilton Avenue, and surrounding communities. Similar to the properties in Northwest Campbell, properties in this area have excellent access to services but limited access to public transit.

Figure 5: North Central Campbell

Northeast Campbell (Area 3) : The third area is located south of eBay, and west of the Hamilton Plaza Shopping Center. Properties in this area have two ‘nearby’ grocery store options (Whole Foods and Trader Joes at the Pruneyard) but fall outside a ½ mile radius of the Hamilton Light Rail station.

Figure 6: Northeast Campbell (Potentially Walkable)

Staff Recommendation & Requested Feedback : Staff recommends using Walkabl e and Drivable areas as an organizing principle for the standards under development. In consideration that AB 2097 restricts the City in its ability to impose minimum parking standards on properties located within ½ mile of public transit, staff also recom mends applying a walkable designation to any properties within these areas. For the three properties identified as potentially being walkable, or drivable, staff recommends designating Area 3 as walkable (given its proximity to light rail and the Pruneyard ), and 8 Packet Pg. 290
Multi-Family Development and Design Standards (PLN-2022-90) Page 7 of 26 Areas 1 & 2 as drivable. However, as these areas exhibit Walkable and Drivable characteristics, the following point has been raised for discussion:

o Should Areas 1, 2, & 3 be treated as “Walkable” or “Drivable (Auto - Oriented)”?

2) Off-Street Parking Requirements

Based on Council direction, staff has worked with Opticos and the Planning Commission Ad-Hoc Subcommittee to evaluate options for updates to the City’s parking requirements.

The analysis included a review of existing parking standards used by the City of Campbell and surrounding communities, parking standards allowed by state law (density bonus law, AB 2097, etc.), community feedback and follows the initial policy direction outlined under Program H-3a included in the draft Housing Element.

“Program H-3a: Update the Municipal Code to reduce parking requirements. The following parking reduction strategies in areas adjacent to light rail, and other parts of the City which will not present impacts to residential neighborhoods, shall be considered:
- Reducing the parking requirements to require no more than two parking spaces per unit
- Provide incentives for reduced parking in the Affordable Housing Overlay Zone (program H-1c)
- Remove guest parking requirements
- Allow parking to be unbundled from residential units
- Consider allowing a combination of unbundled and assigned parking in housing developments”

A summary of the results of this analysis has been provided below:

Campbell Parking Standards : The City of Campbell’s parking standards vary based on the building type, bedroom size, and proximity to transit. The City’s highest parking standard, of 3 spaces per unit, is imposed on small residential townhome projects, and multi-family residential projects with two or more bedrooms. The City’s lowest parking standard, 2 spaces per unit, applies to residential units in the Downtown, and for studio to one-bedroom units located near transit.

8 Packet Pg. 291
Multi-Family Development and Design Standards (PLN-2022-90) Page 8 of 26

Tables 1 & 2: City of Campbell “Standard” & “Transit Standard” Parking Requirements

Broadly comparing the City’s parking standards with those of surrounding communities, Campbell has the highest “standard” parking requirement of any jurisdiction surveyed for townhomes and multi -family development projects, and among the highest parking standards for transit -oriented projects (reference Attachment D - Parking Standards Comprehensive Survey). While this supports an argument to lower some of the City’s parking standards, not all standards need to be updated, or warrant drastic changes to better align with parking standards used by surrounding communities. Further, considering that the development of objective standards for single -family homes are outside the project scope of the Design Standards under development, no changes to those standards are proposed at this time.

Parking Standards by State Law : T he recent passage of AB 2097 prohibits public agencies from enforcing minimum automobile parking requirements fo r residential, commercial, and mixed -use developments located within ½ mile of public transit (industrial properties are not affected). Thus, the standards under consideration will generally apply only to properties outside this area. The one exception is that changes contemplated to the minimum dimension of parking spaces (see related discussion), would affect properties subject to AB 2097 when they elect to provide parking.

8 Packet Pg. 292
Multi-Family Development and Design Standards (PLN-2022-90) Page 9 of 26 Figure 7: 1/2 Mile Buffer Map from Public Transit1
(Includes Stops in the Regional Transportation Plan)

Ad-Hoc Subcommittee Feedback : The Planning Commission Ad -Hoc Sub -Committee was tasked with researching the appropriate number and size of parking spaces. The Ad-Hoc Subcommittee also reviewed parking standards used by the Institut e of Transportation Engineers (ITE) and identified holistic approaches for providing multi - modal improvements to reduce reliance upon automobiles and strategies for creating parking districts. The preliminary results of the Planning Commission Ad -Hoc Subcommittee can be found in Attachment C. The results, and recommendations, stemming from their research will be presented at the meeting.

Parking Stall Dimensions : The City is also exploring utilizing a uniform parking space size of 8½ -feet by 18 -feet to e nsure the size requirements for residential buildings and commercial buildings align. Currently, the parking space stall size for residential projects are 9-feet by 20 -feet, and non -residential uses require a parking space size of 8½ -feet by 18-feet, with different considerations for angled parking spaces. Two parking space size standards for different uses (residential and non -residential) is problematic for mixed-use development, as it creates challenges for space planning, unbundling parking, and being a ble to stack parking spaces in structured parking. Variations in parking space size standards also create challenges to adequately park a project in the most efficient manner.

Developer Feedback: During stakeholder engagement, both market -rate and affordable housing developers have advised the City to reduce its parking requirements to align with market conditions. Recommended parking standards, and related comments are summarized as follows:

• Market-Rate Developers: 1 to 1.5 parking spaces per unit. o Commented that parking is often required for projects to pencil; so even if the City eliminated its parking requirements, market conditions would largely dictate the appropriate parking standard.
o Reiterated that imposing higher parking standards encourages d evelopers to pursue density bonus applications, which can frustrate City objectives.

• Affordable Housing Developers: 0.5 to 0.75 parking spaces per unit. o Commented that higher parking standards for affordable housing severely reduce the likelihood of projects receiving state tax credits. o Reiterated that affordable housing projects need differentiated regulatory requirements and processes from market-rate units to be competitive.

➢ Staff Recommendation & Requested Feedback : Based on the outcomes of the parking analysis, staff recommends establishing a uniform parking space size of 8½

1 Under AB 2097, “Public transit” means a major transit stop as defined in Section 21155 of the Public Resources Code. This definition includes major transit stops that are included in the applicable regional transportation plan.
8 Packet Pg. 293
Multi-Family Development and Design Standards (PLN-2022-90) Page 10 of 26 x18 feet, considering modest reductions to the ‘base’ parking standards, and identifying parking reduction strategies, specific to the walkable or auto -oriented context of the site, to allow for lower parking standards in exchange for certain concessions (such as providing transit passes, or ride share parking).

Staff also recommends establishing a lower parking standard for properties within the City’s Affordable Housing Over lay Zone (AHOZ), consistent with Program H -3a of the Draft Housing Element, to meet the needs of Affordable Housing Developers following the adoption of the Housing Element and General Plan.

It is also recommended that the City organize the new parking s tandards based on the principles of “Walkable” and “Drivable (Auto -Oriented)” areas as a placeholder until formal form -based zones are established. Staff further recommends broadly simplifying the City’s parking standards, by eliminating standards that are not linked to a bedroom count (for greater parity with State Density Bonus Parking Standards) and eliminating dedicated spaces for guest parking.

Staff further recommends reducing the City’s “Standard” and “Transit” parking requirements, in accordance with the tables below. Consistent with Council direction to avoid significant reduction in parking standards that could result in unintended consequences (the need to create neighborhood parking districts), the proposed modifications are modest, falling betw een the City’s existing standard and the State density bonus parking standards.

Unit Size City Parking
Standard
Drivable Areas
(Proposed vs. Existing)
Density Bonus
(For Reference Only)
Single-Family 2 spaces (one
covered) No Change N/A
Small-Lot Single-Family 3 spaces (2 covered,
½ uncovered, ½
guest)
Remove Standard;
Default to Bedroom
Count Standards
N/A
Studio to One Bedroom 2 ½ spaces 2 spaces
(-.5 parking spaces)
1 space
Two or more Bedrooms 3 spaces 2.5 spaces
(-.5 parking spaces)
2 spaces
Four or more Bedrooms N/A N/A 2.5 spaces
N/A - Residential (C-3) 2 spaces per unit Remove Standard; Default to Bedroom
Count Standards
Varies by bedroom
count
Table 3: City “Standard” Parking Requirements vs. Proposed Drivable Areas (Note: Density Bonus Standards are provided for Reference Only)

8 Packet Pg. 294
Multi-Family Development and Design Standards (PLN-2022-90) Page 11 of 26 Unit Size City Transit
Standard
Walkable Areas
(Proposed)
Transit Density Bonus
(For Reference Only)
Studio to One
Bedroom 2 spaces 1.5 space per unit
(-.5 parking spaces)
.5 spaces per
bedroom (11% low/20%
mod)
&
.5 spaces per unit
(all low-income)
Two or more
Bedrooms 2.5 spaces 2 spaces per unit
(-.5 parking spaces)
Table 4: City “Transit” Parking Standard vs. Proposed Walkable Areas (Note: Density Bonus Standards are provided for Reference Only)

Based on the feedback provided on these tables, staff will model the impact to housing development projects that are built under the standards. Further refinements/changes to the parking standards, as well as options to reduce parking further, such as by unbundling parking, may be considered based on the results of this analysis, with the release of the Administrative Draft of the Design Standards next year.

In consideration of the proposed reductions to the City’s park ing standards, the following points have been raised for discussion:
• Should units with two or more bedrooms require a maximum of 2 parking spaces for “Drivable (Auto -oriented)” areas consistent with Program H -3a of the Draft Housing Element?

• Are there an y additional parking reduction strategies that should be considered beyond those outlined by Program H-3a of the Draft Housing Element?

• Should a minimum threshold of one parking space per unit be required, even when parking reduction strategies are applie d (i.e., every unit must have at least one parking space, but any additional spaces may be unbundled from the unit, or waived in exchange for other concessions)?

3) Regulation of Design Standards

As presented in the November 1, 2022, study session, the cha nges under the Housing Accountability Act represent a major paradigm shift in the traditional design approach, which previously allowed for greater public input on projects after submittal.

Recognizing the City can no longer use a discretionary design revi ew process to shape a housing project, the project design review process needs to be “frontloaded” by developing new tools and standards which respond to aspects of the design review process that were previously decided as part of the public review process.

8 Packet Pg. 295
Multi-Family Development and Design Standards (PLN-2022-90) Page 12 of 26

Figure 8: Traditional Project Review process

Figure 9: “Frontloaded” Approach under the Housing Accountability Act

In developing these new tools, the City will need to determine how flexible or prescriptive the Design Standards should be to achie ve desired outcomes. Based on feedback from the community design survey and feedback received from the City Council on September 20, 2022, the City does not have a defined architectural style and thus should not establish one as part of the update process. The City’s existing design guidelines identify the need for high quality design but to avoid the design of projects to be so regulatory that all projects start to look the same or “cookie-cutter”.

The following discussion is intended to outline the too ls and methods under a form - based code that may be used to strike the right balance. Further, as the City’s existing objective development and design standards will be carried forward as part of the update – the focus is primarily on areas where new object ive design standards are being developed to replace existing subjective standards, which are summarized in the following table.

Existing Standards Design Standards
Under Development
Building Envelope
(Height/Setbacks/FAR)

Objective

Objective

Massing / Modulation Somewhat Subjective
(Not Enforceable)

Objective

8 Packet Pg. 296
Multi-Family Development and Design Standards (PLN-2022-90) Page 13 of 26

Site Layout
(Placement of Buildings, Streets,
Alleys, etc.)

Subjective
(Not Enforceable)

Objective

Façade Articulation

Subjective
(Not Enforceable)

Objective

Table 5: Existing Standards vs. Design Standards Under Development

In terms of overall objectives, the development and design standards should prevent the development of buildings, as shown below, which do not incorporate design measures to change in scale and he ight when near smaller buildings (i.e., massing, articulation, site layout, standards addressing adjacency).

Figure 10: Six-Story Mixed-Use Commercial/Residential Building2

2 Source: Campbell Press, August 2021.
8 Packet Pg. 297
Multi-Family Development and Design Standards (PLN-2022-90) Page 14 of 26

Based on the results of the community design survey, it is also clear that the community expects that future projects are high quality, varied in form, and appropriately designed to respond to their site -specific context in the community – with the recently approved Parkview Project having received positive feedback in this regard.

Figure 11: Proposed Parkview Project

Using the City’s existing minimum requirements (i.e., setbacks, floor area ratio) and requiring defined architectural styles (i.e., Victorian architecture only) as bookends, the City needs to determine how regulato ry the standards should be to achieve a desired design aesthetic. With the recently approved Parkview Project as a case-study, the level of detail that makes the project successful (colors, materials, window placement, varied roof heights, frontage treatme nts) necessitate new tools that regulate those aspects of the design of a project. In introducing the tools, the City has the flexibility to decide to what extent they’re applied or to which properties in the city.

As an example, while the Design Standar ds could impose a requirement to select from a palette of storefront standards for the ground -floor treatment of mixed -use projects fronting E. Campbell Avenue in the Downtown, the actual implementation of that standard can be as flexible as desired to ach ieve a particular outcome. If desired, the City could require between 60% and 80% transparent glazing to accommodate a variety of outcomes, while still preventing a tenant space from being completely walled in, or completely comprised of glass.

8 Packet Pg. 298
Multi-Family Development and Design Standards (PLN-2022-90) Page 15 of 26

Figure 12: Palette of Available Frontage Types

Considering that every building will have a palette of options to select from, and a range of options for how to comply with the selected option from the design palette, thousands of different design outcomes could be achieved, even for projects which select the same frontage type. Since the standards also involve architectural standards, building type standards, site design standards, and more – the likelihood of a developer perfectly overlapping on each standa rd selected to such an extent that it would result in cookie cutter appearance will be exceedingly unlikely. It should also be noted that, even without regulations it is possible that two projects could result in the same design outcome – as it is common f or developers to reuse the same design for a project as a cost saving measure – effectively copy and pasting the same design over and over.

Figure 13: Select Design Standards Specified by Zone

Understanding that the City’s standards should not be too prescriptive, the Planning Commission and City Council should provide feedback on aspects of the building design which are critical (and therefore should require higher regulatory control) and 8 Packet Pg. 299
Multi-Family Development and Design Standards (PLN-2022-90) Page 16 of 26 those which are less important (and therefore require lower reg ulatory control) to provide for greater flexibility in outcomes. The key elements of building design regulated by the standards include the following elements:

Figure 14: Design Regulations

Figures 15 & 16: Possible Outcomes Depending on Extent of Design Control

Staff Recommendation & Requested Feedback: To safeguard against site layout and architectural design practices that are inconsistent with the character of the community, staff recommends providing standards to regulate all aspects of the d esign process, such that the regulatory framework is in place to adjust standards overtime to result in improved outcomes. Staff also recommends establishing more prescriptive standards, which achieve desired design outcomes, finding the risk of cookie cut ter outcomes low given the flexibility that would still be provided by the standards (i.e., range of options to select from, and ways to implement that option). Staff further recommends that more restrictive standards are initially established, understandi ng it is easier to reduce requirements than add requirements under the new legislative environment (e.g., SB 330).

To strike the right balance, between being overly prescriptive and/or flexible, staff has raised the following discussion points related to the regulation of design standards:
• Are there certain aspects of a building design which warrant less design control? 8 Packet Pg. 300
Multi-Family Development and Design Standards (PLN-2022-90) Page 17 of 26

• Are there any specific properties or areas in the city (i.e., gateways, downtown) which warrant a higher level of design control, or the development of specific architectural standards to address?

4) Standards to Address Adjacency and Context

While the City has minimum setback requirements, most of the existing standards that address adjacency (such as tall buildings adjacent to single -family neighborhoods) are subjective or do not work in every situation that they are applied. As an example, the slope-line standard, required by Area 2 of the Winchester Boulevard Master Plan, represents a broad, one size fits all , approach to regulating mass /bulk/height. As this standard significantly decreases the development capacity of shallow lots, it has also been identified as a standard that conflicts with existing and proposed residential densities under consideration by the General Plan.

Figure 17: Standards Reviewed & Conflicts Identified

Figure 18: Winchester Boulevard Master Plan Slope Line
The slope-line standard of the Winchester Boulevard Plan also is not context specific, as it results in the same standard being applied all properties wit hin the same area, regardless of whether the adjacent land use is a single -family house or a commercial land use, or public street.

Based on community and City Council feedback, establishing standards that address transitions between lower intensity resi dential uses and higher intensity residential and mixed-use development, are necessary to avoid adverse impacts from land uses and densities under consideration as part of the Housing Element and General Plan. 8 Packet Pg. 301
Multi-Family Development and Design Standards (PLN-2022-90) Page 18 of 26 Further, it is important to establish a variet y of standards that respond best to the uses or buildings that surround the development.

Under a form-based approach, standards may be developed and mapped to properties based on site specific context. This allows for a distinct standard to be developed and applied to a property, or a portion of a property, where it abuts an expressway, highway, or industrial property distinct from the sides of the property that abuts residential uses.

Some of the approaches that are being explored are outlined as follows:

• Require a smaller, ‘house-scale’ building mass towards lower intensity uses

Figures 19 & 20: Examples of House-Scale Approach

• Require a wedding-caking (or daylight plane) towards lower intensity uses

Figures 21 & 22: Examples of Daylight Plane Approach

• Require breaks in building mass.

8 Packet Pg. 302
Multi-Family Development and Design Standards (PLN-2022-90) Page 19 of 26

Figure 23: Example of Providing Break in Building Massing

• Require planting of trees, or taller fences, to buffer lower intensity uses.

Staff Recommendation and Requested Feedback : Staff recommends establishin g standards to address adjacency and context which respond to the following situations:
• Properties with shallow lots
• Properties adjacent to creeks, riparian corridors, and natural habitats • Properties adjacent to industrial uses
• Properties adjacent to public parks, schools, and public facilities • Properties adjacent to rights-of-way, such as highways and expressways • Properties located in denser, walkable areas, such as the Downtown

In developing standards to address these situations, staff will consider potential conflicts with the building or fire code that would prohibit windows or architectural ornamentation (i.e., eaves) from being applied.

In developing standards which respond to adjacency and context, staff is seeking feedback on the following discussion points:

• Are there any additional situations (adjacency situations) which should be considered in the development of design standards?

• Are there any specific design approaches that should be considered to respond to a particular adjacency (i.e., adja cency to creek vs. low -density residential use)?

5) Development Standards for Large Sites

The City does not have any objective standards to address how larger sites in the community are developed, or to govern their division into smaller blocks, connected by private streets and/or pedestrian corridors, that are in scale with, and connected to, the surrounding community. While various goals and policies encourage physically connected transportation infrastructure, such as the following guidance from the 8 Packet Pg. 303
Multi-Family Development and Design Standards (PLN-2022-90) Page 20 of 26 General Plan and South of Campbell Avenue (SOCA) Plan, the policy language is subjective, and as such, may not enforced under the Housing Accountability Act (HAA).

General Plan:
• Strategy LUT -11.1a: Dead -End Streets: Connect dead -end streets with pedestrian and bicycle paths in new developments and in existing neighborhoods where so desired by residents.

• Strategy LUT-11.1d: Bicycle and Pedestrian Connections in Development:

Encourage new or redeveloping projects to provide logical bicycle and pedestrian con nections on site, between parking areas, buildings, and street sidewalks and to existing or planned public right -of-way facilities and encourage pedestrian passages between street -front sidewalks and rear-lot parking areas. Ensure that the bicycle and pede strian connections interface safely.

• Strategy LUT -11.1e: Bicycle and Pedestrian Connections Between Neighborhoods: Facilitate the construction of connected pedestrian and bicycle facilities (e.g., bridges, pathways, sidewalks, and bike lanes) between and within neighborhoods that are attractive, well-lit, comfortable, tree lined and safe, especially within one -half mile of major activity centers, schools, and parks.

SOCA Plan:
• In Area 2, the roadway system should provide an extension of Dillon Avenue to improve circulation, provide emergency vehicle access and integrate projects in this area. Emergency vehicle access should be extended to the southern portions of Area 2. The feasibility and desirability of extending street access to the southern portions of Area 2 should be evaluated in conjunction with review of project proposals.

Further, the city does not have objective standards to require on -site civic open spaces, or community amenities, when large sites are developed as directed by the following strategies and policy from the General Plan:

General Plan:
• Strategy LUT -9.3g: Pedestrian Amenities: Incorporate pedestrian amenities such as plazas, landscaped areas with seating, pedestrian walkways into new developments.

• Strategy LUT -14.6c: Decorative Features: Development projects should incorporate decorative features including plazas that incorporate amenities such as public art, special paving, tile, and fountains.

• Policy OSP-6.3: Public Spaces and Amenities for Community Gatherings:

Ensure safe, c onvenient and attractive public spaces and amenities for 8 Packet Pg. 304
Multi-Family Development and Design Standards (PLN-2022-90) Page 21 of 26 community gatherings and activities.

As these policies were previously implemented through the public review phase of the site design process, new tools may be considered to ensure that larger prope rties are broken up into smaller blocks. Without such standards, buildings with large footprints, and without any physical separations, could be developed as depicted in the following examples:

Figure 24: Large Site Development – Example #1

Figure 25 & 26: Large Site Development – Example #2
In preparing the design standards, the City can pursue adoption of “large site” standards that would prevent the creation of superblocks, by requiring larger properties to be divided into smaller blocks. A key c onsideration at this stage in the development of the Design Standards is to determine whether the City should have large site standards, and if so, how large a property should be before it is required to provide for the types of connections and amenities appropriate for the scale and size of the development.

8 Packet Pg. 305
Multi-Family Development and Design Standards (PLN-2022-90) Page 22 of 26

Figure 27 & 28: Outcome without Large Site Standards vs. with Large Site Standards The following discussion is intended to explain the approach Opticos uses to divide larger properties, and feedbac k received from developers which have expressed concern with the approach.

Large Site Standards : Large site standards are intended for sites larger than a city block, with a goal of supporting the bicycle and pedestrian connectivity called for in the General Plan by integrating such sites into the city’s overall street and block network.

This means dividing large sites into smaller, interconnected blocks that are more in scale with, and connected to, the surrounding community —thereby avoiding outcomes like those illustrated in the figures above. New blocks are typically achieved by adding streets or paseos (which provide opportunities for improved circulation), civic spaces, and building types that better relate to adjoining uses.

The city can establish its own thresholds to determine what size site will trigger these standards. Generally, the standards would apply to sites larger than nearby city blocks.

A recommended baseline is a site area over three acres and/or a site length of over 700 feet, but the se thresholds can vary in different contexts. The city can also determine maximum dimensions for new blocks created through the process —including standards for maximum block perimeter, area, and/or length. To inform the calibration of these standards, Atta chment F (Examples of Potential Small -Block Sizes made from Large Sites) shows a collection of blocks with their associated perimeter and area dimensions, illustrating possible implications of various dimensional thresholds that could be incorporated.

8 Packet Pg. 306
Multi-Family Development and Design Standards (PLN-2022-90) Page 23 of 26 Figures 29 to 31: Potential Approaches to Dividing Large Blocks Once a threshold is established, properties subject to the large site standards would be required to follow a six -step process – involving dividing the site into blocks, identifying the placement of new streets and alleys, and assigning form-based zones (i.e., T-3, T-4) before determining where specific frontage types and design standards should be applied.

Figure 32: Six-Step Process for the Development of Large Sites Following the divi sion of larger sites into smaller blocks, the property is processed the same as any other property subject to the Design Standards.

Developer Feedback : Throughout the stakeholder outreach meetings, and in writing (reference Attachment E – Developer Feedback on Large Site Standards), developers have expressed concerns that the design requirements for large sites will be cost prohibitive or prevent the densities under the Housing Element or General Plan from being achieved. The following points serve to summarize key concerns from Developers on establishing standards which plan for the development of large sites (staff responses below each point are provided in italics):

• Requiring private streets will impact development potential and financial feasibility.

The creation of new blocks may be done through any combination of the following approaches: 1) pedestrian passage (paseo), 2) open space, 3) public or private streets. Paseos, for example, may be far narrower than traditional street ROWs. These thoroughf ares and public spaces accomplish the same goals 8 Packet Pg. 307
Multi-Family Development and Design Standards (PLN-2022-90) Page 24 of 26 conventionally achieved through internal driveways, fire lanes, and open space standards, while enabling the public to benefit from the increased connectivity and open space.

• Dividing properties into smalle r blocks will prohibit certain building types which are more cost-effective to build (e.g., wrap buildings).

The large site standards will not prohibit specific product types, such as wrap buildings; maximum block dimensions will be set to ensure that the se types can be built where appropriate. The size of buildings will depend on the form -based zone(s) being applied to the large site, which depends on what is adjacent to the site (site specific context). For example, the portion of a large site facing a corridor can accommodate larger buildings than the portion that faces houses. In response to the concern that large site standards may be cost -prohibitive, staff is pursuing hiring a third -party consultant to provide an independent cost analysis specific to market conditions.

• Requiring private streets will increase building height as there will be less developable area.

As previously noted, private driveways or streets are often required to provide adequate ingress/egress for emergency vehicles and park ing. While private streets or pedestrian connections through sites can result in a marginal reduction in the buildable area and —depending on the desired level of intensity —could result in slightly taller buildings needed to achieve the desired housing yiel d, the Design Standards would address these changes in scale through other standards under consideration (such as those addressing site adjacency and context).

• Requiring a multitude of building types will make the project financially infeasible.

Higher-intensity zones (accommodating five or more stories) will not specify building types. For sites large enough to engage distinct contexts at different edges, the standards propose to achieve contextual compatibility by differentiating building forms when ab utting low -rise neighborhoods vs. commercial corridors. Wherever zones that generate house -scale buildings are mapped on large sites, the standards intend to require a minimum of two distinct building types to address concerns about excessive repetition. A developer can choose to include more than two building types if desired.

• Large site standards may not account for easements in determining the minimum size subject to the requirements.

The large site standards can account for easements and other site c onditions impacting the amount of developable land within the property. The standards also provide for minor modifications to certain development standards to accommodate site-specific constraints.
8 Packet Pg. 308
Multi-Family Development and Design Standards (PLN-2022-90) Page 25 of 26

Staff Recommendation & Requested Feedback : Recognizing th at the Housing Element and General Plan contemplate land use densities that are two, to three times higher than those allowed today, and will allow for housing on large sites which previously did not allow housing (e.g., San Tomas Aquino Plaza Shopping Cen ter, Frys) staff recommends establishing large site standards to govern the development of sites larger than a city block. To avoid the standards from being overly regulatory, staff would also recommend limiting the number of distinct product types (i.e., townhomes, apartments, mixed-use) that would need to be built on a property (relative to its size) to allow for cost-effective construction.

In developing standards for large sites, seeking is seeking feedback on the following discussion points:
• What size (i.e., acres, lot width/depth) should be used to the threshold for when large site standards are imposed?

• What amenities (e.g., private streets, open spaces, art, civic spaces) should be required for large sites?

• How should larger sites be divided (i.e., by paseos, private streets, open space)?

• Should concessions be offered to offset the impact of complying with large site standards (i.e., reduced parking)?

Project Schedule / Next Steps
Following the subject meeting, the consultant and staff will wor k to refine the key development standards and prepare for the community meeting series in January.

2022
• November 15 – CC Meeting (key standards, walkability map, etc.) (subject meeting)
• November 22 & 29 – PC/CC Meeting (Housing Element mapping refinement)

2023
• January /February – Review of Administrative Draft, Test Fits, Refinement of Standards & Form-Based Zones
• March – Adoption of Design Standards

This timeline keeps the project on schedule for an anticipated adoption in March of 2023 with the General Plan and Housing Element.

FISCAL IMPACTS
There are no specific fiscal impacts associated with this item.

8 Packet Pg. 309
Multi-Family Development and Design Standards (PLN-2022-90) Page 26 of 26 Prepared by:

Tracy Tam, Associate Planner
Approved by:

Brian Loventhal, City Manager
Attachment:
a. Walkable and Auto-Oriented Map
b. Current Parking Standards and Density Bonus
c. Ad-Hoc Subcommittee Parking Reform Ideas
d. Parking Standards Comp. Survey
e. Developer Feedback for Large Sites
f. Examples of Potential Small-Block Sizes made from Large Sites 8 Packet Pg. 310
Reviewed by:

Rob Eastwood, Community Development
Director

Campbell Multi-Family
Development + Design
Standards
Campbell, CA
November, 2022
Walkable +
Drivable Areas
26 61
60 26
Hamilton
Winchester
Downtown Campbell

SAN JOSE

CAMPBELL

LOS GATOS

SARATOGA
17 HAMILTON
DELL
1ST

WINCHESTER

SAN TOMAS

VIRGINIA

BASCOMCENTRAL
BUDD
2NDRINCON
CAPRI
BENT
DARRYL
CARLYN
MIDWAY
GALE
WALDO

ALMARIDA

MCGLINCY
ERIN
LEIGH

RIDGELEY

SILACCI
SMITH
HAZEL
AUDREY
LOVELL
3RD
ELAM

RAILWAY

WHITE OAKS
PATIO
CAMDEN

CAMPBELL
MCCOY

EL SOLYO
NIDO

HARRIET

SUNNYOAKS

WESTMONT
SALMAR
WALNUT

STEINWAY

HACIENDA

HARRISON
HYDE
ALICE

VILLARITA
GRACE
LINDA
DILLON

KENNETH
APRIL
GAY
VICTOR
GRANT
EMORY
4TH
DOT
CHERRY

REDDING

CALADO SPRINGFIELD
HARDY
SONUCA

BUCKNAM

THERESA
PAYNE
CAMEO
HOLMES
CONNIE

ROSEMARY
YORK

ADRIEN CURTNER
DALLAS

CRISTICH
ESTHER

TIMBER COVE

ENSENADA
FRIAR

CAMBRIAN
MILTON
LENOR

SHELLEY
HUNT

CENTRAL PARK
BOISE
ABBOTT
ROBIN
ADLER

MILLICH
MCBAIN
LISA
MONICA

CATALPA

SHEFFIELD
VALE

PALO SANTO
DAVID
PARR
PAULA

SOBRATO

CIVIC CENTER

RICHLEE

BURROWS

DUNSTER

PHANTOM
POPLAR

COLLEEN
GWEN
PAGE

SHAMROCK

APRICOT
ECHO

MARILYN

KUEHNIS

CHRISTOPHER

FEWTRELL
HACK

CREEKSIDE

HOFFMAN
ABBEY
LA PAZ
ELWOOD
PEGGY

LONGFELLOW
PETER

SALERNO
MORE
INWOOD
GILMAN
NADINE

KENNEDY
FULTON
VALLEY
CRAIG

MICHAEL

JEFFREY
RICKY

DEL PRADO

SAN TOMAS AQUINO
EBBETS

SUNNYSIDE

SUNBERRY

MONTEMAR

SHADY DALE

OLD ORCHARD

EMERSON

EL MORO
WESTON
SHADLE
MOZART

WEST VALLEY
LAURA

LATIMER
ARC

CAMPISI

WALTERS

LOYALTON

EL CAMINITO
DENVER
REGAS
BLAND

JANE ANN
ROSE

NORMANDYREGINA

ARROYO SECO
ROBWAY
TURNER
EDEN

LLEWELLYN
ARCHER

DIVISION

BISMARCK
SHARP

CALIFORNIA
MUNRO
HOLLIS

LA PRADERA

ONTARIO

OLYMPIA

GRIFFITH
SONDRA
CLOVER
WILTON

CHAPMAN
WREN
EILEEN
HURST
UNION

HEDEGARD

WENDELL

MC GLINCEY
WATSON

CROCKETT

SUPERIOR

RANCHERO

WHITEHALL

LA PALOMA
BEDAL

RADFORD
POLLARD SAN TOMAS EXPWY TO SB SR 17
KEITH
SCOTT

BEARDEN
PECAN

COVENTRY
GINDEN

BRANBURYMORRENE WARWICK

FLORENCE
FAWN

MARIANNA
KINGS
LOUISE

LOST LAKE
MONETA
WB CAMDEN AVENUE TO NB SR 17

RAVENSCOURT

OAK PARK

PALOMAR REAL
OBURN

TOLWORTH
KIM

PARKHURST
GOMES

MARGARET

JIM ELDER

CENTURY FLAMINGO
PENNY

FAIRBANKS

ROBNICK
GEORGE
FORMAN
MILLER
TUBBY

HAZELWOOD

LA CORONA
LOWELL

HAWTHORNE
QUEENS

HERBERT

CHARLESTON

MONTE VILLA

VALLEY FORGE
DOVER

BROWNING

DRY CREEK
SAFFLE

JOHN KIRK

CORLISS

EL PATIO
MANX

DE CARLI

LORETTA
WB SR 85 TO SB SR 17

HERITAGE VILLAGE

MITCHELL

MISSION

LORELEI
LANA

MORRISON

BARBANO
ALLEN

PLUM BLOSSOM

BRIARWOOD

DEL ROY

LOTTIEWINSLOW

SAINT PAUL

PICADILLY
DELLA

LAWNDALE
GLENN
CORA

SALERNO

LATIMER

CAMPBELL
MCBAIN

DIVISION
MONICA
PETER
PARR
BASCOM
UNION
17 HARRISON

UNNAMED

SAN TOMAS

HAMILTON
EMORY
CAMDEN
POPLAR
ABBOTT
MILTON
CAMDEN
RINCON
BASCOM

CAMPBELL

HARRIET
ABBOTT
PEGGY

LATIMER

KENNETH
MILTON
MONICA

CROCKETT
3RD
Walkablity
Walkable + Transit-Served
Drivable (Auto-
Oriented)
Potentially Walkable
(Not in MFDDS)
Walkable Main Streets/Centers
Groceries
Transit Service
VTA Light R
ail Station
VTA Light Rail
Half Mile Distance from VTA Light
Rail Station
High Frequency Bus Routes
Half Mile Distance from Major Bus
Route Intersection
Certain standards, such as parking
requirements and setbacks, may be
modified depending on proximity/
access to high-quality transit, centers
of activity, and daily necessities.
0 1000 2000500
ft¯
Attachment A 8.a
Packet Pg. 311
Attachment: Walkable and Auto-Oriented Map (Multi-Family Development and Design Standards (PLN-2022-90)) 1 Parking Standards
Unit Size City Parking Standard Density Bonus Difference Single-Family 2 spaces
(one covered) N/A
(Bedroom Count Dependent)
N/A
(Bedroom Count Dependent)
Small-Lot Single-Family 3 spaces
(2 covered, ½ uncovered, ½ guest)
Studio to One Bedroom 2 ½ spaces 1 space +1.5 spaces
Two or more Bedrooms 3 spaces 2 spaces +1 space
Four or more Bedrooms N/A 2.5 spaces +.5 space
N/A - Residential (C-3) 2 spaces per unit 2.5 spaces Varies by unit size; may overlap with Density Bonus Transit standard
Unit Size City Transit Standard Density Bonus Transit
Studio to One Bedroom 2 spaces
.5 spaces per bedroom
(11% low/20% mod)
&
.5 spaces per unit
(all low-income)
+1.5 spaces
Two or more Bedrooms 2.5 spaces
+1.5 spaces
(11% low/20% mod)
&
+2 spaces
(all low-income)
*varies for more than 2 bedroom
Attachment B8.b
Packet Pg. 312
Attachment: Current Parking Standards and Density Bonus (Multi-Family Development Parking Reform Ideas
Shoup-style reforms
In Old Pasadena: meters established in commercial areas (“Parking Benefit District”) in 1993, revenue directed entirely to street improvements. Metering is active on Sundays and evenings, supported by the business community. Retail sales went up considerably; Old Pasadena is now an excellent destination. A classic case study.
http://shoup.bol.ucla.edu/SmallChange.pdf
ITE requirements
In areas not covered by AB 2097, we should at least reduce our requirements to ITE levels for non-residential uses. This is the same “double-dipping” thing we’re doing with adjacency: ITE adds a buffer, we add a buffer in the rules, then we add a buffer on top of that at application time, and that’s how parking lots get hugely inflated.

Bike substitution
Some cities allow a portion of parking spaces used for bike parking.

Santa Cruz: up to 10% of spaces,
https://www.cityofsantacruz.com/Home/ShowDocument?id=58671 Palo Alto: max(2 spaces, 10%),
https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/paloalto/latest/paloalto_ca/0-0-0-81031 Reduce traffic
Lots of suggested policies here: https://www.vtpi.org/tdm/tdm28.htm#_Toc128220494 Some policies reduce tra
ffic as well as reducing parking volumes:
● Smaller parking stalls. (Compact spaces 20% smaller
, 25% compact -> 5% more parking.)
● Valet parking. (Capacity +20-40%)
● Parking pricing. (Aim for 85% occupancy, variable fees.) (Price elasticity of parking is -0.1 to -0.3; implementing pricing reduces drive-alone commuting by 10-30%.) ● Unbundle parking.
● Walking/Cycling improvements.
○ https://www.vtpi.org/tdm/tdm25.htm
○ Requires better infrastructure for mode shifting.

Overflow parking arrangements for unusual peak parking situations, e.g., special ev ents. Establish
shuttle services, allow pricing for owners to rent out parking for events.

8.c
Packet Pg. 313
Attachment: Ad-Hoc Subcommittee Parking Reform Ideas (Multi-Family Development and Design Standards (PLN-2022-90)) Automatic enforcement
https://www.passportinc.com/blog/digital-parking-enforcement-what-is-it-and-how-does-it-work/ It’s possible to enforce parking rules based on license plate recognition, without requiring police time. This also makes it fair. More investigation is required.

Transportation improvements
This requires improvements to infrastructure as well, so a broader scope.

Four-type model of cyclists:
https://blog.altaplanning.com/understanding-the-four-types-of-cyclists-112e1d2e9a1b Most people who actually commute by bike are unrepresentative; a lot more would commute by bike if it were safer.

Level of Traffic Stress analysis is helpful here:
https://blog.altaplanning.com/level-of-traffic-stress-what-it-means-for-building-better-bike-networ ks-c4af9800b4ee
Ideally, we’d provide routes between areas with separated or buffered bike lanes so you don’t have to ride in traffic. Costs are generally comparatively low, and it works well with reducing parking levels/pricing remaining parking.

Further reading
Lots of case studies here: https://parkingpolicy.com/
Map of case studies here: https://parkingreform.org/resources/mandates-map/

8.c
Packet Pg. 314
Attachment: Ad-Hoc Subcommittee Parking Reform Ideas (Multi-Family Development and Design Standards (PLN-2022-90)) Category Use Per Campbell ITE Reference Notes
Education, Public Assembly and Recreation
Commercial day care center Type 565 (Day Care Center) We require 1/employee + 1/5 children Student 0.24
Employee 1.22
Schools/Instructional
Elementary/junior high Classroom 1.50 1.80 Type 522 (Middle/Junior High School) We also require 1/75ft assembly space; assumed 20 students/class.

High school Classroom 10.00 5.98 Type 530 (High school) We also require 1/75ft assembly space; assumed 23 students/class.

Commercial schools
Studios, small
Studios, large
Tutoring center, small
Tutoring center, large
Public facilities
Community/cultural/ recreational center
Libraries, museums, art galleries 1000sqft 5.00 2.35 Type 590 (Library) Public assembly
Places of public assembly
Entertainment and recreation
Arcades and indoor amusement/recreation centers 1000sqft 5.00 Bowling alleys Lane 4.00 4.39 Type 437
Health/fitness centers 1000sqft 6.70 4.73 Type 492 (Health/Fitness Club) Pool and billiard rooms Table 4.00 2.69 Type 438 (Billiard Hall) Only 2 observations Private clubs 1000sqft 5.00
Skating rink 1000sqft 2.50 5.80 Type 464 (Roller skating rink) Only 1 observation Tennis/racquetball/handball or other courts
Theaters, concert halls, banquet facilities Seat 0.30 0.38 Type 441 (Live theater) Numbers are per attendee Manufacturing and Processing
General manufacturing, industrial, and processing use1000sqft 2.50 0.65 Type 110 (General Light Industrial) Research and development, laboratories 1000sqft 3.30
Warehouses and storage facilities (not incl. mini-stora1000sqft 2.50 0.39 Type 150 (Warehousing) Motor Vehicle and Related
Motor vehicle parts and supplies 1000sqft 2.86 1.70 Type 843 (Automobile Parts Sales) Motor vehicle repair and maintenance 1000sqft 1.69 Type 943 (Automobile Parts and Service Center) Campbell requires 2 spaces per service bay plus 4.44/1000sqft non-service area Gasoline stations 1000sqft 4.00 8.11 Type 960 (Super Convenience Market/Gas StationITE graph is not well correlated Motor vehicle etc. sales etc. 1000sqft 3.08 Type 841 (Automobile Sales (Used)) Campbell requires 1/450sqft of indoor or outdoor showroom space, 1/225sqft office space, 1/750sqft warehouse space Self-service vehicle washing
Full-service vehicle washing
Retail trade
Banks and financial services 1000sqft 2.86 2.39 Type 710 (General Office) Building materials, hardware stores, garden centers e1000sqft 3.33 3.36 Type 862 (Home Improvement Superstore) Campbell also requires 1 space per 1000sqft exterior display space Furniture stores 1000sqft 2.50 0.96 Type 890 (Furniture Store) Retail stores, speculative commercial buildings 1000sqft 5.00 2.91 Type 820 (Shopping Center) But up to 4.58 in December Warehouse retail stores 1000sqft 3.33 2.73 Type 857 (Discount Club) But up to 5.58 in December Services
Services, general 1000sqft 4.00 2.39 Type 710 (General Office) Hotels and motels room 1.00 1.18 Type 310 (Hotel) Campbell also requires 1 per employee Professional offices 1000sqft 4.44 2.56 Type 712 (Small office building) Medical services
Medical, dental clinic, offices, and laboratories 1000sqft 4.44 2.56 Type 712 (Small office building) Hospitals, extended care bed 1.25 3.74 Type 610 (Hospital) Campbell also requies 1/400sqft office area Restaurants
Eating/drinking establishment (no drive-through) seat 0.33 0.47 Type 932 (High-turnover sit-down restaurant) Campbell also requires 1/200sqft non-dining space Eating establishment (with drive-through) seat 0.33 0.44 Type 934 (Fast-Food Restaurant with Drive-ThrougCampbell also requires 1/200sqft non-dining space Drive-in restaurant
Take-out restaurant

8.c
Packet Pg. 315
Attachment: Ad-Hoc Subcommittee Parking Reform Ideas (Multi-Family Development and Design Jurisdiction Existing Parking Requirements - Citywide Existing Transit Oriented (within 1/2 mile) Parking Requirements Parking Reduction Strategies Under Consideration Notes/Exceptions:

Single-Family Small-Lot Single-Family (Townhomes, attached residential etc.) Studio to One-Bedroom Two or more Bedrooms Studio to One-Bedroom Two or more Bedrooms City of Campbell 2 spaces (one covered) 3 spaces (2 covered, 1/2 uncovered, 1/2 guest) 2.5 spaces 3 spaces 2 spaces 2.5 spaces Program H-3a: Update the Municipal Code to reduce parking requirements. The following parking reduction strategies in areas adjacent to light rail, and other parts of the City which will not present impacts to residential neighborhoods, shall be considered:

• Reducing the parking requirements to require no more than two parking spaces per unit • Provide incentives for reduced parking in the Affordable Housing Overlay Zone (program H-1c) • Remove guest parking requirements
• Allow parking to be unbundled from residential units
• Consider allowing a combination of unbundled and assigned parking in housing developments • Consider relationship to permit parking programs in the right of way In Downtown City requires 2 spaces per residential unit Palo Alto - - - - - - -
Saratoga 2 covered spaces within a garage 2.5 spaces for each unit (one within a garage) 2.5 spaces for each unit (one within a garage) N/A N/A Policy 3.1: Reduced Parking for ADUs. Reduce or eliminate parking requirements for deed restricted, affordable ADUs or JADUs pursuant to State Law. Consider whether to further reduce off street parking space.

San Jose See notes Pending elimination of Parking Requirements Citywide.

Pending public hearing in November 2022 to consider
elimination of Parking Requirements Citywide; excepting obligations related to SJ Sharks.

Monte Sereno
2 covered spaces and 2 uncovered (3 uncovered if no on-street parking)1 covered and 1 uncovered N/A N/A N/A N/A None Gilroy 2 Spaces (1 covered. 1 uncovered) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A None Multi-family has different regulations. Downtown has different regulations. https://www.codepublishing.com/CA/Gilroy/#! /Gilroy30/Gilroy3031.html
Mountain View 2 Spaces (1 covered)
Small-Lot Single family = 2 spaces/unit (1 covered) + 0.5 guest space / unit Rowhouse:
- Studio = 1.5 space/ unit, 1 space covered + 0.3 guest space / unit - 1-bedroom or more = 2 covered spaces + 0.3 guest space/ unit Townhouse:
- 2 spaces / unit (1 covered) + 0.6 guest space / unit
Studio or 1-bedroom
smaller than 650 sf =

1.5 spaces (1 covered space) / unit
1-Bedroom larger than 650 sf =
2 spaces / unit (1 covered)
2 spaces (1 covered) / unit N/A N/A
Program 1.1.d: Zoning Ordinance Update
-Complete a review of development standards in one or more zoning districts and modify standards to address feasibility constraints. Reviewed development standards could include open area, parking (including parking for 100% affordable housing projects), TDM, and other standards that may create constraints on development.

In addition to required parking for multi-family, 15% of parking spaces required will be reserved for guest parking
Precise Plan (El Camino Real, San Antonio, and buffer zones of East Whisman)
- Studio and 1-bedroom: 1 space / unit
- 2-bedroom and larger: 2 spaces / unit
- Guest parking: 15% of the parking spaces required will be reserved for guest parking
Precise Plans (North Bayshore and outside buffer zones of East Whisman)
-No Parking Minimums
Downtown Precise Plan
- Studio and 1-bedroom: 1.5 space / unit + 0.3 guest space /unit
- 2-bedroom and larger: 2 spaces / unit + 0.3 guest space /unit -If in Parking District, can pay a parking in-lieu fee for guest parking instead of providing it on-site
County of Santa Clara 2 Spaces (1 covered) +1 for an ADU 2 Spaces (1 covered) +1 for an ADU 1 per bedroom plus one per employee
1 per bedroom plus one per
employee 1 per bedroom plus one per employee 1 per bedroom plus one per employee None.

ADU and SB9 state exceptions only. Ag employee housing
requires 1 spot per unit or 1,200 sf of living space, whichever yields a greater amount of parking.

Sunnyvale
City of Santa Clara 2 covered spaces 2 spaces per unit w/ at least 1 being covered N/A N/A 1 per unit (Residential units with a floor area of less than five hundred fifty (550) square feet: 0.5 space per unit.) 1 per unit The Zoning Administrator shall have authority to grant a minor modification (25% of requirement) of the automobile parking space and loading space requirements.

City of Milpitas 3 bedrooms or fewer: 2 spaces (covered or uncovered) 4 or more bedrooms: 3 per unit + 1 for each addt'l bedroom N/A Studio: 1 covered/unit 1 Bedroom: 1.5 covered/unit
2-3 bedrooms: 2covered/unit
4 or more bedrooms: 3 per unit plus 1 addt'l space for each addt'l bedroom (at least two covered) Studio: Min. 0.8 covered; Max. 1.0 covered
1 Bedroom: min. 1.2 covered; Max. 1.5 covered
Min. 1.6 covered; Max. 2.0 covered
Guest Parking: 15% of total Program 20: Specific Plans - Establish minimum zoning densities and maximum parking standards. Address shared parking and unbundled parking Morgan Hill 2 covered per unit 2 covered per unit 2 to 2.5 spaces (Two Bedroom 1 covered and 1 uncovered per unit) (Three Bedroom 1 covered and 1.5 uncovered per unit)N/A N/A None In downtown:
• Units 600 sq.ft. or less 1 space per unit
• Units 600-1,350 sq.ft. 1.5 spaces per unit
• Units greater than 1,350 sq.ft. 2 spaces per unit
Town of Los Gatos 2 spaces (covered or uncovered) 2 spaces (covered or uncovered) per unit plus one visitor parking space for each residential unit other than detached single-family or two-family dwellingN/A N/A policies and implementation programs in draft Housing Element to study or consider reduced parking except as required for reduced parking requirements for ADUs and SB9
Los Altos Hills 2 covered and 2 uncovered N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A None ADU and SB9 unit requires one additional uncovered parking Los Altos Pending
Cupertino 2 covered + 2 open 2 open + 0.8 open

8.d
Packet Pg. 316
Attachment: Parking Standards Comp. Survey (Multi-Family Development and Design Standards (PLN-2022-90)) October 27th, 2022

City of Campbell – Rob Eastwood / Stephen Rose / Planning Commission / City Council 70 N 1
st Street
Campbell CA 95008

Re: San Tomas Plaza Housing Redevelopment

Dear Mr. Eastwood, Mr. Rose, Planning Commissioners, and Members of the City Council,

Thank you for your ongoing work on Campbell’s Housing Element Update.

On behalf of US BWG SAN TOMAS PLAZA, LLC we request that the San Tomas Plaza Shopping Center (listed as 100 N. San Tomas Aquino Rd. in the draft housing element) be subject to objective design standards that allow for large lot subdivision - such that a single multifamily building could be designed and constructed on a lot larger than 4-acres. Our knowledge as multifamily developers and market research indicates that the 9.23-acre site must be developed as two “wrap style” buildings, each on its respective lot, in order to meet the 60 unit/acre density in a cost-effective manner. The location of the property does not lend itself to a higher density product type, such as a “podium” building typology, as the unit price of construction is driven to a level not supported by rents in our micro submarket of Campbell.

Generally, construction of a podium building costs between $25,000-$40,000/unit (depending on design factors) more than a wrap building.

Our understanding is that the current Opticos draft of Multifamily Design Standards would limit single-building lot sizes to 3-acres or less. Please reconsider this aspect of the current Design Standards, which makes our redevelopment economically infeasible.

We look forward to submitting a formal application for housing after the adoption of the Housing Element Update and Objective Design Standards in 2023.

Sincerely,

Pete Beritzhoff
Bay West Development

8.e
Packet Pg. 317
Attachment: Developer Feedback for Large Sites (Multi-Family Development and Design Standards (PLN-2022-90)) Santa Clara Square
• Block Perimeter: 1,490 feet
• Block Area: 3.24 acres

8.f
Packet Pg. 318
Attachment: Examples of Potential Small-Block Sizes made from Large Sites (Multi-Family Downtown Campbell
• Block Perimeter: 1,120 feet
• Block Area: 1.77 acres

8.f
Packet Pg. 319
Attachment: Examples of Potential Small-Block Sizes made from Large Sites (Multi-Family South of Campbell
Avenue
• Block Perimeter: 1,760 feet
• Block Area: 3.35 acres

8.f
Packet Pg. 320
Attachment: Examples of Potential Small-Block Sizes made from Large Sites (Multi-Family Frisco, Texas (Block 1)
• Block Perimeter: 2,040 feet
• Block Area: 4.79 acres

8.f
Packet Pg. 321
Attachment: Examples of Potential Small-Block Sizes made from Large Sites (Multi-Family Frisco, Texas (Block 2)
• Block Perimeter: 1,830 feet
• Block Area: 3.50 acres

8.f
Packet Pg. 322
Attachment: Examples of Potential Small-Block Sizes made from Large Sites (Multi-Family Paseo Villas, San Jose
• Block Perimeter: 1,370 feet
• Block Area: 2.57 acres

8.f
Packet Pg. 323
Attachment: Examples of Potential Small-Block Sizes made from Large Sites (Multi-Family City
Council
Report
TITLE: Semi-Permanent Parklet Grant Program (Resolution / Roll Call Vote)

RECOMMENDED ACTION
That the City Council adopt a resolution approving the adoption of the Semi-Permanent Parklet Grant Program and accompanying budget adjustments to assist business owners with the construction of Semi -Permanent Parklets, and adopt a Resolution extending the Temporary Parklet Program to March 28, 2023.

BACKGROUND
On October 4, 2022, the Council authorized the issuance of grants to Downtown businesses to assist in the construction of Semi -Permanent Parklets in public right of way. Council direction was to allocate from ARPA funds a total amount of $400,000 for up to sixt een parklets (with a maximum of two parking spaces) in grant amounts of between $25,000 and $40,000. If sixteen grant applications are approved, the grant amount would be $25,000. If fewer than ten applications are approved, the maximum amount of a grant i s $40,0001 For any business approved for a grant, the City will also pay for the parklet design customization for up to $3,000 per parklet.

Adoption of this semi -permanent parklet grant program responds to Council direction and will allow the grant progra m to move forward in compliance with state and federal laws and ensure that public funds will be allocated and used appropriately to achieve the community benefit of continued economic vitality of Downtown Campbell. In addition to establishing a parklet gr ant program, the proposed resolution would extend the temporary Downtown Parklet Program from January 6, 2023 to March 28, 2023. While staff had originally proposed extending the date to remove parklets for only the operators opting to participate in the S emi-Permanent Parklet Program, staff is now recommending that the Council consider extending the removal date for both existing participants and applicants for semi -permanent parklets until March 28, 2023 . This recommendation is based on the efficiency to deploying the barrier removal equipment 1 Based on a telephone survey conducted by staff prior to Council authorizing a grant program, ten businesses indicated interest in building a parklet; five businesses responded “no” to participating. At the time of this survey the businesses were told a City grant was not guaranteed.

Item: 9
Category: UNFINISHED BUSINESS
Meeting Date: November 15, 2022
9 Packet Pg. 324
Semi-Permanent Parklet Grant Program Page 2 of 6
once rather than deploying cranes and clean-up crews in the Downtown at two separate points in time.

In accordance with state and federal requirements, the semi -permanent parklet grant program includes the following components -

• The City Attorney has advised that use of public funds for both the design and the construction of the parklets is subject to state law requiring prevailing wage .

Prevailing wage can increase the construction cost by as much as 35 percent. • The City must also issue 1099s to the grant recipient. Business es will be advised to confer with a tax professional regarding federal and state tax regulations for grants.
• State law (AB 562) requires the City to hold a public hearing that discloses the purpose, economic benefits and names of grant recipients and amounts received before grants are distributed. The use of American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funds for the grants will require sub-recipient reporting and monitoring to the U.S.

Treasury.

DISCUSSION

Grant Application Process and Amounts

The City’s Semi -Permanent Parklet Grant Program is modeled after grant application procedures used by many cities in the Bay Area that provided federal CARES grants to businesses during the pandemic. The City’s application process also closely follows the process used by the Town of Los Gatos for its parklet grant program. For comparison purposes, Los Gatos used ARPA funds for the grants which were limited to 75% of construction cost or up to $40,000, whichever is less. Like Los Gatos, the City’s grant will reimburse businesses for qualified construction expenses (material and labor, up to between $40,000 to $25,000 after the parklet is completed) . Staff proposes that If the parklet only uses one parking space, the grant will be up to one -half of $40,000 or $25,000. There may be instances where the frontage of the business limits the parklet to one-and-half spaces. In that event staff proposes that a grant applicant is eligible for a grant based on two parking spaces.

Grant Eligibility and Application:

The grant application and final agreement require the signature of both the business and property owner.
• Businesses must submit a statement which addresses the basis of grant need including information such as cu rrent business level compared to 2019; the number of new full and part -time jobs, if any, that be added because of expected 9 Packet Pg. 325
Semi-Permanent Parklet Grant Program Page 3 of 6
increase in business due to additional capacity; and any other benefits to the business.
• The business must be in good standing with the City by meeting all of the following criteria:
o Obtain an active business license; and
o Demonstrate a ll City permits are in good standing (e.g., Use Permit, Live Entertainment, Outdoor Dining, etc.); and
o Have no use permit violations; and
o Have no active code enforcement violations.

Note: businesses must cure any of the above by the final date of the application process.
• The grant application must be deemed complete by the final date of the application process.

Terms of the Grant and Disclosures
• Applicant needs an approved parklet permit for final grant approval. • An agreement with terms of grant must be executed between the City and each grant recipient; agreement must also be signed by the property owner. • Applicant will need to provide signed letter from contractor confirming compliance with state requirements for prevailing wage i.e., contractor and each subcontractor, if any, must submit electronic certified payroll records at regular intervals (weekly, biweekly, or monthly), directly to the Labor Comm issioner pursuant to Labor Code section 1771.4(a)(3)(A). Contractor must provide copies of Certified Payroll records within 10 days if requested by the City per Labor Code section 1776(b) and (d).
• Applicants will need to submit a W -9 to the City ; grants are subject to 1099s issued by the City.
• Grant payments will be dispersed when the project is completed , final building department occupancy has been issued , and proof payment documentation for eligible costs is verified by the finance department.
• City may deny reimbursement for unqualified expenses. • All records and information pertaining to the grant application are considered public information.
• Parklets will be owned by the property owner.

Administration of the Grant Application Process:

The City will open the semi -permanent parklet and grant application programs at the same time and applicants may submit both an application online for a parklet and a grant. A maximum of sixteen grant applications 2 can be accepted online and processed. 2 The remaining applicants will be placed on a wait list and complete the application process. If applicants withdraw or are not approved, they will be replaced by those on the wait list. 9 Packet Pg. 326
Semi-Permanent Parklet Grant Program Page 4 of 6
The planned opening date for applications is January 9, 2023 . Applicants will have four weeks to complete the application process (satisfy all requirements) so that the number and amount of each grant can be determined. An applicant needs an approved parklet permit for grant approval. The City will begin removing all temporary parklets whether the restaurant has submitted an application or not on March 29, 2023. The City will request that each business operating a temporary parklet remove their privately owned furnishings and decking prior to March 29, 2023.

Economic development staff will take the lead in reviewing grant applications with assistance from planning, building, code enforcement, public works, and finance. Once the application is deemed complete, final app roval of grants will be determined by the City Engineer. The grant amount will be determined by the number of grants that are approved.

Per state law (AB 562), a public hearing will be held before the City Council once the grant recipients are identified to disclose the following:
• Name and address of all corporations or any other business entities that are approved for a grant; and
• The timeline for the City grant process; and
• A description of the grant (“ economic development subsidy ”), including the estimated total amount of the expenditure of public funds by, or of revenue lost to, the City because of the economic development subsidy; and • A statement of the purpose and public benefit of the economic development subsidy; and
• Estimated number of jobs crea ted or maintained by the economic development subsidy, broken down by full-time, part-time, and temporary positions; and • The estimated net tax revenue accruing to the City because of the subsidy; and • The information required should be available to the publ ic and be posted on the City’s web site for the entire term of the economic development subsidy; and • A follow-up report and public hearing is required within five years of the issuance of grants.

Applicants who have been approved will be notified before the required public hearing.

NEXT STEPS / TIMELINE
Allowing time for the holiday season (which typically accounts for 50 percent or more of annual sales for a small business), the application process for both grants and parklets is proposed to start January 9, 2023. Staff plans on emailing eligible businesses and property owners and holding an outreach meeting about the grant and parklet application process in early December.
9 Packet Pg. 327
Semi-Permanent Parklet Grant Program Page 5 of 6
The City’s grant application process follows procedures used by many other c ities that have provided grants to businesses during and after the pandemic. The objective is to ensure that public funds will be allocated and used appropriately to achieve continued economic vitality in Downtown Campbell.

FISCAL IMPACT
At the October 4 meeting, City Council directed staff to allocate up to $400,000 total from the City’s ARPA funds towards the parklet grant program. This is an acceptable use of the funds under applicable ARPA guidelines. The attached resolution and budget adjustment form for FY 2023 officially appropriate the funds for this purpose.

When this use and all planned uses of ARPA funds are taken into account, the ARPA Fund (#221) is estimated to have an ending balance of approximately $6.5 million by the end of FY 2023 an d $5.8 million by the end of FY 2024. Additionally, please note that the FY 2023 Adopted Budget includes up to $36,000 in the ARPA Fund for downtown barrier rental and removal costs. Should this amount prove to be insufficient, staff will return to Council at mid-year to request an additional budget adjustment.

ALTERNATIVES

1. Provide direction to staff for any modifications to the proposed grant program.

2. Do not adopt the adopt the Semi -Permanent Parklet Program Grant Program and/or approve a budget adjustment for the establishment of the grant program.

Prepared by:

Leslie Parks, Economic Development Specialist
Approved by:

Brian Loventhal, City Manager
Attachment:
a. CC Resolution Approving Semi-Permanent Parklet Grant Program b. Budget Adjustment Form
9 Packet Pg. 328
Reviewed by:

Rob Eastwood, Community Development
Director

Semi-Permanent Parklet Grant Program Page 6 of 6
c. CC Resolution - Extending Temporary Parklet Program to Mar 28, 2023 9 Packet Pg. 329
RESOLUTION NO. _____________

BEING A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

CAMPBELL AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF AMERICAN RECOVERY

PLAN ACT (ARPA) FUNDS IN THE FORM OF GRANTS THROUGH A SEMI-

PERMANENT PARKLET GRANT PROGRAM TO ASSIST ELIGIBLE

BUSINESSES WITH THE CONSTRUCTION OF SEMI -PERMANENT

PARKLETS IN DOWNTOWN CAMPBELL TO SUPPORT EXPANDED
OUTDOOR DINING AND BUSINESS OPERATIONS IN THE DOWNTOWN.

WHEREAS, on July 5, 2022, the Campbell City Council adopted Resolution 12859 which established a Semi-Permanent Parklet Program in Downtown Campbell to support expanded outdoor dining and business operations in the Downtown;

WHEREAS, on October 4, 2022, the City Council directed City staff to develop a Grant Program to provide support for applicants of the Semi -Permanent Parklet Program in order to support for the continued economic vitality of Downtown Campbell and assist businesses still recovering from the COVID-19 pandemic;

WHEREAS, the City desires to establish a Semi-Permanent Parklet Grant Program using $400,000 of American Recovery Plan Act (ARPA) fund s to support up to 16 grants (depending on the number of approved applications, the minimum grant shall be up to $25,000 and the maximum grant shall be up to $40,000) to assist businesses with the construction of Semi-Permanent Parklets in the Downtown; and

WHEREAS, the administration of the Semi-Permanent G rant Program and terms and conditions for the granting of funds shall be as set forth in Exhibit A.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Campbell that the Downtown Campbell Parklet Grant Program be administered with the use of up to $400,000 of ARPA funds and authorize the associated bud get adjustment ; that grant recipients be subject to the terms and conditions set forth within Exhibit A; that a public hearing be held to disclose all reporting requirements in accordance with California law; and that city shall require a prevailing wage for the construction of the parklets and compliance with administrative requirements.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this ____ day of ____ 2022, by the following roll call vote:

AYES: Councilmembers:

NOES: Councilmembers:

ABSENT: Councilmembers:

9.a
Packet Pg. 330
Attachment: CC Resolution Approving Semi-Permanent Parklet Grant Program (Semi-Permanent Parklet Grant Program) City Council Resolution No. Page 2 of 2 PLN-2022-39 – Authorizing Grants to Assist with Semi-Permanent Parklets Construction

APPROVED
_________________________
Paul Resnikoff, Mayor
ATTEST:

___________________________
Andrea Sanders, City Clerk

9.a
Packet Pg. 331
Attachment: CC Resolution Approving Semi-Permanent Parklet Grant Program (Semi-Permanent Parklet Grant Program) City of Campbell
Semi-Permanent Parklet Program

– Exhibit A –

Grant Program Application Guidelines –

1. Description of Grant Program
• Total funding for City’s grant program capped at $400,000 • Total funding divided by number of approved grants
o Maximum grant if less than 10 applicants: up to $40,000 o Minimum grant based 16 parklets: up to $25,000
• If applications exceed 16 (in the order received), a waiting list will be established
• Four weeks are allowed for completing application process. Applications then must be deemed complete by application process end date • Grant funds can be used for construction labor and materials related to parklet (identified in contractor’s agreement); accessories such as heaters, heat source, furniture, plants, etc. not eligible
• Upon completion of parklet and submittal of receipt and payment copies that document qualified expenses, applicant is reimbursed up to between $25,000 or $40,000 depending on the number of approved applications • City is also providing $3000 for design/engineering for construction plans.

2. Eligibility criteria for grant:
• Business must submit a statement of need for grant that addresses but is not limited to the following:
o How will the parklet assist the business with recovery from economic impacts from the COVID-19 pandemic?
o How will the grant help the business maintain or increase the number of employees?
o The business must be able to cover the cost of parklet if it is more than grant amount.
o Other ways the grant and parklet will assist the business. • Business owner or property owner can apply for grant (whoever constructs the parklet).
• The property owner is required to sign the grant application and agreement between the City and the approved applicant.
• Applicant must be in good standing by having (consistent with adopted Parklet Guidelines):
o Active business license;
o All permits in good standing (e.g., Use Permit, Live Entertainment, Outdoor Dining, etc.);
o No use permit violations;
o No active code enforcement nor permit revocation action • Applicant must have approved parklet permit for final approval of grant

9.a
Packet Pg. 332
Attachment: CC Resolution Approving Semi-Permanent Parklet Grant Program (Semi-Permanent Parklet Grant Program)