Agenda, regular meeting — Campbell City Council, January 22, 2024 (part 2 of 3)

Attached data also includes a description of changes to the Contract Documents that the proposed substitution will require for its proper installation.

The undersigned certifies that the following paragraphs are correct: (CIRCLE either yes or no; if no, submit separate letter stating in detail deviations from the following paragraphs.

1. Yes No The proposed substitution do es not affect dimensions shown on Drawings.

2. Yes No The undersigned will pay for changes to the building design, including engineering design, detailing, and construction costs caused by the requested substitution.

3. Yes No The proposed substitution will have no adverse affect on other portions of the Work, the construction schedule or specified warranty requirements.

The undersigned further states that the function, appearance, and quality of the proposed substitution are equivalent or superior to the specified item.

Submitted by General Contractor

Signature ____________________________ For use by the Architect/Engineer Firm ____________________________ [ ] Approved [ ] Approved as noted Address ____________________________ [ ] Not
Approved
[ ] Received too late
____________________________ By _______________________________ Date ____________________________ Date _______________________________ Telephone ____________________________ Charges for Review & Evaluation: ________

8.c
Packet Pg. 183
Attachment: Construction Specifications and Bid Solicitation for Building M Roof Replacement Project (No. 24-SS) (CCC - Building M Roof P
roject # ____________
SUBSTITUTION REQUEST – ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Page 3 ends

P
lease include the following information attached to the request for substitution.

1. A
n explanation of the advantages to the City for accepting the substitution.

2. A comparison of significant qualities of the proposed substitution with those specified.

3. A list of changes or modifications needed to other parts of the work and to construction performed by the City and separate Contractors that will be necessary to accommodate the proposed substitution.

4. A statement indicating the substitution’s effect on the Construction Schedule compared to the Construction Schedule without acceptance of the substitution. Indicate the effect of the proposed substitution on overall contract time.

5. Cost information, including a proposal of the net change, if any, in the Contract Sum.

6. Certification that the substitution is equal to or better in every respect to that required by Contract Documents, and that it will perform adequately in application indicated. Include Contractor’s waiver of rights to additional payment or time extensions that may be necessary because of the substitution’s failure to perform adequately.

8.c
Packet Pg. 184
Attachment: Construction Specifications and Bid Solicitation for Building M Roof Replacement Project (No. 24-SS) (CCC - Building M Roof

Appendix B:

Construction Workday Calendar

8.c
Packet Pg. 185
Attachment: Construction Specifications and Bid Solicitation for Building M Roof Replacement Project (No. 24-SS) (CCC - Building M Roof

CONSTRUCTION WORKDAY CALENDAR
2024 - 5 Day

JANUARY JULY

SUN MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT 683 684 685 686 807 808 809 810
1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6
687 688 689 690 691 811 812 813 814 815
7 8 9 10 11 12 13 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
692 693 694 695 816 817 818 819 820
14 15 16 17 18 19 20 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
696 697 698 699 700 821 822 823 824 825
21 22 23 24 25 26 27 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
701 702 703 826 827 828
28 29 30 31 28 29 30 31

FEBRUARY AUGUST
704 705 829 830
1 2 3 1 2 3
706 707 708 709 710 831 832 833 834 835
4 5 6 7 8 9 10 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
711 712 713 714 836 837 838 839 840
11 12 13 14 15 16 17 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
715 716 717 718 841 842 843 844 845
18 19 20 21 22 23 24 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
719 720 721 722 846 847 848 849 850
25 26 27 28 29 25 26 27 28 29 30 31

MARCH SEPTEMBER
723 851 852 853 854
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
724 725 726 727 728 855 856 857 858 859
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
729 730 731 732 733 860 861 862 863 864
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
734 735 736 737 738 865 866 867 868 869
17 18 19 20 21 22 23 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
739 740 741 742 743 870
24 25 26 27 28 29 30 29 30
31 APRIL OCTOBER
744 745 746 747 871 872 873 874
1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5
748 749 750 751 752 875 876 877 878 879
7 8 9 10 11 12 13 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
753 754 755 756 757 880 881 882 883
14 15 16 17 18 19 20 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
758 759 760 761 762 884 885 886 887 888
21 22 23 24 25 26 27 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
763 764 889 890 891 892
28 29 30 27 28 29 30 31

MAY NOVEMBER
765 766 767 893
1 2 3 4 1 2
768 769 770 771 772 894 895 896 897 898
5 6 7 8 9 10 11 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
773 774 775 776 777 899 900 901 902
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
778 779 780 781 782 903 904 905 906 907
19 20 21 22 23 24 25 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
783 784 785 786 908 909 910
26 27 28 29 30 31 24 25 26 27 28 29 30

JUNE DECEMBER
911 912 913 914 915
1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
787 788 789 790 791 916 917 918 919 920
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
792 793 794 795 796 921 922 923 924 925
9 10 11 12 13 14 15 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
797 798 799 800 801 926 927 928 929
16 17 18 19 20 21 22 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
802 803 804 805 806 930 931
23 24 25 26 27 28 29 29 30 31
30 249 Working Days Prepared 10-17

8.c
Packet Pg. 186
Attachment: Construction Specifications and Bid Solicitation for Building M Roof Replacement Project (No. 24-SS) (CCC - Building M Roof Appendix C:

Best Management Practices for the Construction Industry

8.c
Packet Pg. 187
Attachment: Construction Specifications and Bid Solicitation for Building M Roof Replacement Project (No. 24-SS) (CCC - Building M Roof

8.c
Packet Pg. 188
Attachment: Construction Specifications and Bid Solicitation for Building M Roof Replacement Project

8.c
Packet Pg. 189
Attachment: Construction Specifications and Bid Solicitation for Building M Roof Replacement Project Appendix D:

City’s Storm Water Pollution Control Requirements

8.c
Packet Pg. 190
Attachment: Construction Specifications and Bid Solicitation for Building M Roof Replacement Project (No. 24-SS) (CCC - Building M Roof Chapter 14.02 - STORMWATER POLLUTION CONTROL
Sections:

14.02.010 - Purpose.
(a) T he U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has identified urban stormwater runoff as the leadin g c
ause of water pollution in the United States. Furthermore, both federal and state agencies hav e i
dentified stormwater runoff from the city as a major source of pollution adversely impacting th e benef
icial uses of the South San Francisco Bay. As a result, the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, San Francisco Bay Regio n, has issued a National Pollutant Discharge Eliminati on S
ystem ("NPDES") permit requiring the city to establish legal authorities sufficient to protect its municipal storm drain system from certain prohibited discharges. The city is also required to implement a stormwater management program to assure that stormwater runoff from the city does not cause or contribute to a violation of the water quality standards of South San Francisco Bay. (b) T
he purpose of this chapter is therefore to provide minimum requirements designed to control th e di
scharge of pollutants into the city municipal storm drain system and to assure that discharges from the city municipal storm drain system comply with applicable provisions of the Federal Clean Water Act and the current N ational Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit No. CA0029718 including amendments and California Regional Water Quality Control Board approvals. Enactment of this chapter falls within the scope of the city police power to protect the health, safety and welfare of its residents. Nothing in this chapter is intended to preclude more stringent federal or state regulation or any activity covered by this chapter.
(Ord. 2046 § 1(part), 2004; Ord. 1869 § 1(Exh. A)(part), 1993).

14.02.020 - Definitions.

The following words and phrases, when used in this chapter, shall be as defined in this section.

Words and phrases used in this chapter and not otherwise defined shall be as defined in the regulations promulgated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to implement the requirements of the Federal Clean Water Act, or as defined by the State Water Resources Control Board to implement the California Water Code:
"Applicable materials" mean all materials used in industrial or commercial establishments that ar e stored outdoors, that may be exposed to stormwater, and that have the reasonable potential to degrade the quality of runoff from the site. These include, but are not limited to, all materials containing cadmium, chromium, copper, lead, mercury, nickel, selenium, silver and zinc, which are pollutants that have specifically been identified as known to contribute to impairment of applicable water quality standards. "Deemed complete" means that a project applicant has submitted a development application package for discretionary approval that is determined to be a complete and acceptable application by the community development director. Public projects are deemed complete if funding has been approved by the city council and construction has been scheduled.
"Discharge" means the discharge, addition, placement, deposit, release or dumping of any pollutant or combination of pollutants to surface waters from any point source. This definition includes, but is not limited to, additions of pollutants into waters, from: surface runoff and discharges through pipes, sewers, channels or other conveyances owned by a state, municipality or other person which do not lead to a treatment works. "Discharge," within the meaning of this chapter, shall also mean any discharge on public or private property which results or will reasonably result in a discharge into any and all watercourses.

Such discharges represent a process whereby pollutants, debris and chemicals are placed or otherwise deposited on streets, construction sites, parking lots and other exposed surfaces and are subsequently washed off and carried away by stormwater runoff into watercourses.

8.c
Packet Pg. 191
Attachment: Construction Specifications and Bid Solicitation for Building M Roof Replacement Project (No. 24-SS) (CCC - Building M Roof "Grease" means and includes fats, oils, waxes or other related constituents. Grease may be of mineral origin, including kerosene, lubricating oil and road oil. Grease may also be of vegetable or animal origin, including butter, lard, margarine, vegetable fats and oils, fats in meats, cereals, seeds, nuts and certain fruits. Grease is generally present as, but need not be, a floatable solid, a liquid, a colloid, an emulsion, or in a solution.
"Grease generating activity" means any commercial or industrial activity that uses or produces grease on an ongoing basis.
"Grease removal device" means an interceptor or other mechanical device designed, constructed and intended to remove, hold or otherwise prevent the passage of grease to the (sanitary sewer or) municipal storm drain system.
"Impervious surface" means a constructed or modified surface that does not allow rainfall to percolate through to the subsoil and thus creates stormwater runoff. Impervious surface includes, but is not limited to, building rooftops, pavement, sidewalks, patios, driveways or other hardscape where such surfaces are not constructed with pervious materials and/or are not designed so as to have zero stormwater discharge.
"Interceptor" means a receptacle or trap designed and constructed to intercept, separate and prevent the passage of prohibited substances into the (sanitary sewer or) municipal storm drain system. "Major development or redevelopment project" means a project that creates, adds, or replaces an amount of impervious surface as defined in the current NPDES permit. "Municipal storm drain system" means and includes, but shall not be limited to, t hose facilities within the municipality by which stormwater may be conveyed to waters of the United States, including any roads with drainage systems, municipal streets, catch basins, curbs, gutters, ditches, manmade channels or storm drains, which are not part of a publicly owned treatment works (POTW). "NPDES permit" means a valid National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit issued by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, San Francisco Bay Region, in accordance with regulations promulgated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to implement the requirements of the Federal Clean Water Act.
"Pollutants" mean and include all sewage, sewage sludge, garbage, biological materials, radioactive materials, and chemical, industrial and agricultural waste discharge into water. "Project with significant pollution potential" means any project determined by the city to be likely to have sources of pollutants on- site and/or to contribute pollutants to stormwater after project completion, based on a review of the proposed uses of or activities planned for the site. "Stormwater" means all rainfall runoff, surface runoff and drainage. "Watercourses" mean and include all natural waterways and definite channels and depressions in the earth that carry water, even though such waterways may only carry water during rains and storms and may not carry stormwater at and during all times and seasons. Watercourses include facilities owned and operated by the Santa Clara Valley Water District.
(Ord. 2046 § 1(part), 2004; Ord. 1916 § 1, 1995; Ord. 1869 § 1(Exh. A)(part), 1993).

14.02.030 - Requirements.
(a) Non-stormwater Discharges.
(1) Discharge Prohibition. No person shall discharge or cause to be discharged into the municipal storm drain system or watercourses any materials other than stormwater. In addition, no person shall discharge or cause to be discharged into the municipal storm drain system or watercourses, any pollutants or waters containing any pollutants that cause or threaten to contribute to a violation of applicable water quality standards. It is also unlawful to discharge, or cause to be discharged into any storm drain or natural outlet or channel, any sewage, industrial

8.c
Packet Pg. 192
Attachment: Construction Specifications and Bid Solicitation for Building M Roof Replacement Project (No. 24-SS) (CCC - Building M Roof waste or other polluted waters or materials without a valid NPDES permit or written authority from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency or its designated enforcement agent. (2) E
xceptions to Discharge Prohibition. The preceding discharge prohibition in subsection (a)(1) of this section shall not apply to any discharge that is specifically authorized by an NPDES permit to flow to a storm drain or natural outlet or channel. In addition, the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, San Francisco Bay Region, has determined that the discharg e
pr
ohibition shall not apply to the following "permissible" activities: water line flushing, landscape irrigation/lawn watering, uncontaminated foundation drains, uncontaminated nonindustrial roof drains, irrigation water, uncontaminated groundwater infiltration, residential car washings, flows from firefighting, flows from potable water sources, and dechlorinated swimming pool waters. (3
) P
rotection Against Accident Discharge. The owner or operator of a commercial or industrial establishment shall provide reasonable protection from accidental discharge of prohibite d m
aterials or other wastes into the municipal storm drain system or watercourses. Facilities to prevent accidental discharge of prohibited materials or other wastes shall be provided and maintained at the owner or operator's expense.
(4
) R
eport of Accidental Discharges. Where an accidental discharge of prohibited materials or other wastes has entered the municipal storm drain system or a watercourse, such incident shall be reported to city or designated agent as soon as possible, but in no event later tha n
t
wenty-four hours after such a discharge. If the accidental discharge or prohibited materials or other wastes emanates from a commercial or industrial establishment, the owner or operator of such establishment shall also retain an on- site written record of the discharge and the actions taken to prevent its recurrence. Such records shall be retained for at least three years. A notic e
s
hall be permanently posted in a conspicuous place on the premises of each commercial or industrial establishment advising employees of the department or agency to call in case of suc h an
accidental discharge.
(5) A
batement of Prohibited Discharge by Responsible Party. The prohibited discharges ar e dec
lared to constitute a public nuisance. Remediation and abatement of prohibited disc harges shall be the responsibility of persons causing such discharge. The city shall be advised of t he abat
ement and shall inspect the discharge site to insure that the nuisance has in fact been abated.
(b) W
atercourse Protection.
(1) W
atercourse Protection Requirements. Every person owning property through which a w
atercourse passes, or such person's lessee, shall keep and maintain that part of t he w
atercourse within the property reasonably free of trash, debris, excessive vegetation, and other obstacles that would pollute, contaminate or significantly retard the flow of water through the watercourse. In addition, the owner or lessee shall maintain existing privately owne d
s
tructures within or adjacent to a watercourse, so that such structures will not become a hazard to the use, function or physical integrity of the watercourse. The owner or lessee shall not remove healthy bank vegetation beyond that actually necessary for maintenance, nor remove the vegetation in such a manner as to increase the vulnerability of the watercourse to erosion. (2) A
cts Requiring Permit. No person shall commit or cause to be committed any of the followi ng ac
ts, unless a written permit has first been obtained from the city or designated agent:
(A) D
ischarge into or connect any pipe or channel to a watercourse; (B) Mo
dify the natural flow of water in a watercourse;
(C) C
arry out development within a setback designed in whole or in part to protect a watercourse;
(D)
Deposit in, plant in, or remove any material from a watercourse, including its banks, except as required for necessary maintenance;
(E) C
onstruct, alter, enlarge, connect to, change or remove any structure in a watercourse; or

8.c
Packet Pg. 193
Attachment: Construction Specifications and Bid Solicitation for Building M Roof Replacement Project (No. 24-SS) (CCC - Building M Roof (F) Place any loose or unconsolidated material along the side of or within a watercourse or so close to a side as to cause a diversion of the flow, or to cause a probability of such material being carried away by stormwater passing through such watercourse. (c) Outdoor Storage of Materials.
(1) Proper Outdoor Storage of Materials Required. All applicable materials stored outdoors at a commercial or industrial establishment shall be managed in a manner that minimizes the discharge of pollutants to stormwater and as is required to meet water quality standards.

Establishments covered by the general NPDES permit for stormwater discharges associated with industrial activities that has been promulgated for Santa Clara County by the California Regional Water Qualit y Control Board, San Francisco Bay Region, shall address this requirement in applicable provisions of their stormwater pollution prevention plan. (2) Protection Against Accidental Discharge. The owner or operator of a commercial or industrial establishment shall provide reasonable protection from accidental discharge of applicable materials to the municipal storm drain system or watercourses. Specifically, secondary containment systems or equivalent measures approved by the fire department shall be provided for all applicable materials that are liquids. All facilities to prevent the accidental discharge of applicable materials to the municipal storm drain system and watercourses shall be provided and maintained at the owner or operator's expense.
(3) Report of Accidental Disc harge to the Storm Drain. Where applicable materials have entered the municipal storm drain system or a watercourse due to an accidental discharge at a commercial or industrial establishment, the owner or operator of such establishment shall report such incident to public works department as soon as possible, but in no event later than twenty - four hours after such a discharge. The owner or operator of such establishment shall also retain an on- site written record of all accidental discharges of applicable materials (whether or not such discharge actually entered the municipal storm drain system or a watercourse) and the actions taken to prevent their recurrence. Such records shall be retained for at least five years.

A notice shall be permanently posted in a conspicuous place on the premises of each commercial or industrial establishment advising employees of the department or agency to call in case of such an accidental discharge.
(d) Grease Disposal and Control.
(1) Grease Disposal Prohibited. No person shall dispose of any grease, or cause any grease to be disposed, by discharge into any drainage piping, (any public or private sanitary sewer), any part of the municipal storm drain system, or any land, street, public way, river, stream or other watercourse.
(2) Grease Removal Device Required. The owner or operator of every newly constructed, remodeled or converted commercial or industrial establishment with one or more grease generating activities shall install or cause to be installed for each grease generating activity, a grease removal device (of an approved design) for preventing the passage of grease to the municipal storm drain system and watercourses.
(3) Maintenance of Grease Removal Devices Required. The contents of all grease removal devices shall be removed periodically as necessary to prevent a violation of this chapter. At a minimum, the contents shall be removed every ninety days. All grease removal devices shall be kept in good repair, and shall be maintained in continuous operation at the owner or operator's expense.
(e) New Development/Redevelopment.
(1) Stormwater Management Required for Major Projects. Every applicant for a building permit and/or grading permit for a major development or redevelopment project shall identify the potential for stormwater to be discharged from the project site following completion of construction activity and shall demonstrate that the plans, drawings or specifications for such project include the installation of management techniques, practices, and control measures designed to mitigate the potential adverse impacts of stormwater that may be discharged from

8.c
Packet Pg. 194
Attachment: Construction Specifications and Bid Solicitation for Building M Roof Replacement Project (No. 24-SS) (CCC - Building M Roof the project site on an ongoing basis including stormwater treatment measures. In addition, applicants for building and/or grading permits for projects with significant pollution potential may be required to demonstrate that sources of pollutants will be controlled on- site with appropriate measures. The stormwater management techniques, practices, and control measures shall be selected, designed, and maintained in accordance with the city's current NPDES permit requirements and the city's Stormwater Management Manual. (2
) I
ssuance Permits. The city shall not issue a building permit and/or grading permit for a major development or redevelopment project or a project with significant pollution potential until it has reviewed the mitigation measures proposed by the applicant pursuant to subsection (e)(1) of this section, where appropriate, and determined that they are sufficient to address the potential adverse impacts of stormwater that may be discharged from the project site on an ongoing basis.
(3
) O
ccupancy. The building official shall not issue a certificate of occupancy or other equivalent permit for a major development or redevelopment project or a project with significant pollutio n pot
ential until it has determined that the mitigation measures identified in the building permit and/or grading permit issued for such project have been adequately implemented and that appropriate arrangements have been made to ensure that these management techniques, practices and control measures will be maintained on an ongoing basis in accordance with th e
c
ity's current NPDES permit requirements and the city's Stormwater Management Manual. (Ord. 2046 § 1(part), 2004; Ord. 1869 § 1(Exh. A)(part), 1993).

14.02.040 - Enforcement—Violation—Penalties.
(a) C riminal Penalties. Any person who violates any provision of this chapter shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be punishable by imprison ment for a term not to exceed six months or by a fine not to exceed one thousand dollars or by both. Each and every violation of this chapter shall constitute a separate offense. Every day each such violation continues shall be an additional offense.
(b) C
ivil Penalties. Any person who violates any provision of this chapter shall be civilly liable to the city in a sum not to exceed one thousand dollars per day for each day in which the violation occurs. Each and every violation of this chapter shall const itute a separate offense. Every day each such violation continues shall be an additional offense.
(c
) C
ivil Liability. Any person who violates any provision of this chapter shall be civilly liable to the city for all costs, including attorney's fees, ass ociated with the investigation and remediation of environmental conditions caused by the discharge of pollutants into the municipal storm drain system or watercourse in violation of this chapter.
(d
) R
emedies Cumulative. The remedies provided for in this chapter are cumulative and not exclusive and shall be in addition to any and all other remedies available to the city under state and federal law.
(e) P
ublic Nuisance. The discharge of pollutants and related applicable materials into any municipal storm drain system or other watercourses, in violation of any provision of this chapter, is declared to be a public nuisance and shall be subject to any and all remedies available, pursuant to city, state and federal law, including but not limited to injunctive relief. The director of public works may record with the county recorder's office a declaration of nuisance for the particular parcel so noticed. (Ord. 1930 § 3, 1995; Ord. 1916 § 2, 1995; Ord. 1869 § 1(Exh. A)(part), 1993).

14.02.050 - Inspection.

8.c
Packet Pg. 195
Attachment: Construction Specifications and Bid Solicitation for Building M Roof Replacement Project (No. 24-SS) (CCC - Building M Roof (a) During Regular Business Hours. Every business establishment that is open to the public shall permit agents of the city to inspect their premises for compliance with this chapter at any time the business is open to the public.
(b) Other Times. Notwithstanding subsection (a) of this section, agents of the city may inspect any property for compliance with this chapter upon providing the owner and occupants of the property at least twenty-four hours' advance notice of the inspection in the following manner:
(1) A notice shall be conspicuously posted on the property to be inspected, specifying the date, time and reason for the proposed inspection and setting forth a telephone number with directions for the residents or property owners to call for further information; and (2) If the identity and address of the owner is known, such owner shall be notified of the proposed inspection by first class mail, setting forth the same information required by subsection (b)(1) of this section.
(c) Provisions Supplemental. The inspection provisions set forth in this section are intended to supplement, and not supersede, any existing authority for inspection by city officials. In the event that any provision of this section is found by a court of competent jurisdiction to be void or unenforceable, the remaining portions shall remain in full force and effect. (Ord. 1947, 1997).

8.c
Packet Pg. 196
Attachment: Construction Specifications and Bid Solicitation for Building M Roof Replacement Project (No. 24-SS) (CCC - Building M Roof Appendix E:

South Bay Water Recycling Program

8.c
Packet Pg. 197
Attachment: Construction Specifications and Bid Solicitation for Building M Roof Replacement Project (No. 24-SS) (CCC - Building M Roof South Bay Water
Recycling Program
700 Los Esteros Road, San José, CA 95134
Recycled water is used in water features and the irrigatation system of the Evergreen Community College campus in south San José.

Environmental Services Delivering world class
utility services and programs to improve our
health, environment, and economy
www.sjenvironment.org Main: 408-535-8550
Media Contact
Jennie Loft, Public Information Manager
[email protected]
408-535-8554
I
n the South Bay, recycled water is a locally sustainable and established component of the non-potable water supply. With pipeline in the cities of San José, Santa Clara, and Milpitas, South Bay Water Recycling (SBWR) is the largest of four recycled water systems in Santa Clara County. The other systems
are associated with the wastewater treatment facilities in Sunnyvale, Gilroy/Morgan Hill, and Palo Alto/Mountain View.

CUSTOMERS, RETAILERS & SERVICE AREA
� Number of customers: ~ 750
Includes Levi’s Stadium, Great America, McCarthy Ranch
Shopping Center, Evergreen College, Guadalupe Gardens,
Intel, and San José City Hall
�
SBWR is a reycled water wholesaler to San Jose Water
Company, San José Municipal Water, City of Santa Clara, and City of Milpitas; customers buy recycled water from the water retailer for their location
SYSTEM
SBWR comprises a north-south artery across San José and an east-west artery from mid-Milpitas down through the
eastern side of Santa Clara. These main arteries feed extension pipelines to reach various customers. The system includes:
�
140 miles of pipeline and growing
� 5 pump stations
� 3 above-ground storage reservoirs that together have a storage capacity of 9.5 million gallons

PRIMARY USES OF SBWR RECYCLED WATER
� Irrigation at public parks, theme parks, golf courses, street medians, business landscaping, and college campuses
� Industrial cooling towers and 4 power plants
� Toilet/urinal flushing in dual-plumbed commercial and municipal buildings

RECYCLED WATER SOURCE
� SBWR main pump station is adjacent to the San José-Santa Clara Regional Wastewater Facility (RWF), which manages the SBWR program
�
RWF produces an average 110 mgd of high quality, tertiary- treated water; roughly 13% flows to SBWR, remainder
discharges into the Bay
�
As of March 2014, SBWR blends RWF tertiary water with
water from Silicon Valley Advanced Water Purification
Center, operated by the Santa Clara Valley Water District mgd = million gallons per day
over

8.c
Packet Pg. 198
Attachment: Construction Specifications and Bid Solicitation for Building M Roof Replacement Project (No. 24-SS) (CCC - Building M Roof M:\MEDIA FACT SHEETS\SBWR MediaFactSheet
04-25-16 jh
recycled water signage
SBWR main pump station
Great America irrigates with
recycled water

INVESTMENT & RATE SETTING
� SBWR reflects a ~$250 million investment to date; US
Bureau of Reclamation is reimbursing SBWR for 25% of this investment
�
Santa Clara Valley Water District has contributed several million dollars to SBWR
�
San Jose Water Company is constructing new extensions
to the system at their own cost, and paying a $2 million capacity fee to ensure system reliability
�
SBWR sets the wholesale recycled water rate to water
retailers, who in turn set rates for their respective customers

CONTACTS
SBWR
City of San José Environmental Services Dept.

Media contact: Jennie Loft (408) 535-8554

RECYCLED WATER RETAILERS
City of Milpitas Water & Sewer
Public Works Department
1265 North Milpitas Boulevard, Milpitas, CA 95035
Phone: (408) 586-2600 www.ci.milpitas.ca.gov

City of Santa Clara Water & Sewer Utility
1500 Warbutron Avenue, Santa Clara, CA 95050
Phone: (408) 615-2000 www.santaclaraca.gov

San Jose Municipal Water System - Recycled Water
Engineering & Operations
3035 Tuers Rd., San José, CA 95121
Phone: (408) 535-3500 www.sanjoseca.gov

San Jose Water Company
110 W. Taylor St., San José, CA 95110
Phone: (408) 279-7900 www.sjwater.com

DELIVERY VOLUME & GREEN VISION
SBWR deliveries have grown:
�
2012: SBWR delivered an average 10.3 mgd to ~690 customers � 2014: SBWR delivers average 14 mgd to ~750 customers
With an average home of 4 people using 400 gallons per day, the rate of 14 mgd offsets enough drinking water to supply ~ 35,000 homes daily
�
Production since inception in 1998: 43.9 billion gallons Equivalent to the water use of ~ 217,000 homes in one year � San José’s Green Vision, a plan for a sustainable San José, includes a goal to recycle or beneficially use 100% of our wastewater and targets 40 mgd of recycled water use by 2022

REGULATIONS & WATER QUALITY MONITORING
� Regional Water Quality Control Board regulates and
monitors the safe use of recycled water under Title 22 of the California Code of Regulations; the Board also reviews building plans to ensure that reycled water and drinking water pipes and systems do not mix
�
Title 22 outlines bacteriological water quality standards for the expected degree of public contact with recycled water; if public contact is anticipated, disinfected tertiary treatment is required, such as provided by SBWR
�
RWF laboratory, a state-of-the-art water quality lab, tests SBWR recycled water regularly to ensure its safety; SBWR frequently surpasses requirements for recycled water
quality

ROLE OF SILICON VALLEY ADVANCED WATER

PURIFICATION CENTER (SVAWPC)
� Santa Clara Valley Water District opened SVAWPC in March 2014 as a demonstration project to advance recycled water as a drought-proof component of our water supply
�
8 mgd capacity
� Receives secondary-treated wastewater from RWF and uses microfiltration, reverse osmosis, and ultra-violet disinfection to fully purify the water
�
At SBWR main pump station, SVAWPC purified water blends with RWF tertiary water, thus reducing its salt content �
SBWR provides water that ranks among the highest quality recycled water in California
For more information, visit www.sjenvironment/sbwr

8.c
Packet Pg. 199
Attachment: Construction Specifications and Bid Solicitation for Building M Roof Replacement Project (No. 24-SS) (CCC - Building M Roof Revision 0223015
South Bay Water Recycling
Recycled Water Access Point Program
Fact Sheet

Expanding Recycled Water Use with Recycled Water Access Points (RWAP) To conserve our valuable drinking (potable) water supplies, South Bay Water Recycling (SBWR) has made recycled water available for commercial non-potable uses at several truck fill locations in San José and Milpitas. State Approved uses include construction activities such as grading, compaction, concrete wetting, and dust control as well as landscape irrigation, pressure washing, and sewer flushing.

Recycled Water Quality
Recycled water is highly treated to meet rigorous and protective standards set by the State Water Resources Control Board – Division of Drinking Water, and SBWR currently supplies clean and safe tertiary-treated recycled water to over 750 customers in San Jose, Milpitas and Santa Clara.

Participation Requirements
Users must complete a short Training and sign a User Agreement to confirm the correct use of the fill stations and the proper handling of recycled water. In addition, trucks must be inspected and labeled to certify that they are correctly equipped to transfer recycled water.

After truck and driver certification, users will be issued a portable recycled water meter, with a unique nozzle that can only fit the RWAP hydrants. This minimizes the possibility of cross- connections between the potable and recycled water distribution systems.

Construction exemptions for required use of recycled water may be granted on a case by case basis
, depending on the availability of recycled water near the project site. Please contact the City Planning Department for more information on the required use of recycled water for proposed projects.

Getting Started
In order to complete the certification process, and receive meters, site keys, and the most updated site maps, please contact the recycled water retail agencies listed below:

Milpitas – call (408) 586-2600
San Jose –call (408) 277-3671

RWAP Supervisor Trainings are scheduled every Wednesday morning from 9am-11am at the San Jose/Santa Clara Regional Wastewater Facility (700 Los Esteros Road in San José) or by appointment. Contact the City of Milpitas for trainings and inspections in their area.

8.c
Packet Pg. 200
Attachment: Construction Specifications and Bid Solicitation for Building M Roof Replacement Project (No. 24-SS) (CCC - Building M Roof South Bay Water Recycling
Recycled Water Access Point
FAQs

1. What is a Recycled Water Access Point?
A Recycled Water Access Point (or RWAP) is a stand-pipe that allows a certified RWAP Supervisor access to recycled water to fill their tanker truck.

2. How can I get locations and information about using recycled water from an RWAP? Please contact your local water retailer or South Bay Water Recycling for availability in your area.

City of Milpitas – (408) 586-2600
City of San José – South Bay Water Recycling (408) 277-3671

3. What are the uses for recycled water?
Recycled water is approved for nonpotable (non drinking) uses such as irrigation, dust control, and street sweeping

4. Can I use recycled water to irrigate my landscape at home? No. Recycled Water is approved only for commercial (non-residential) uses.

5. Can I drink recycled water?
No. At this time, recycled water is not approved for drinking.

6. Do I have to use recycled water?
The use of recycled water is required by many city ordinances if recycled water is available. Visit your local city’s planning department for availability in your area.

7. Where does recycled water come from?
Recycled water is produced from treated wastewater from the San Jose/Santa Clara Regional Wastewater Facility.

8. Why is recycled water regulated more than potable (drinking) water? Recycled water is safe to use by trained personnel to assure it is used appropriately and that the public drinking water supply is separated and protected from contamination.

9. Are there any rules I need to follow when using recycled water? Recycled water has not been treated and disinfected for drinking. The use of recycled water is therefore regulated by the State of California Division of Drinking Water, State Water Resources Control Board to ensure that the public health and potable water supply are separated and protected from contamination. To assure that the use is appropriate, the State has required that users be trained, vehicles and sites are inspected and certified, and appropriate safeguards are in place to protect public health.

10. Do I have to use a special container?
All containers must be properly labeled, per the SBWR RWAP User Agreement. Recycled water is only distributed to certified RWAP Supervisors with registered trucks that have been inspected.

11. Can I store recycled water at my site or commercial business? Yes. Recycled water can be stored on site, with appropriate signage and use management per the User Agreement.

12. Do I have to get certified in multiple cities or will one certification work at all SBWR locations? Recycled Water Access Point Supervisors can be trained and registered at any qualified SBWR water agency.

13. Can I take the recycled water I picked up in one city and take it to another city? Yes. Recycled water purchased from one city may be used in a different city.

14. Can I use a potable meter to access recycled water or do I have to get a special meter? The RWAP meter is different from a potable water meter, so you must use a recycled water RWAP meter when accessing recycled water.

15. Do I need to clean my tank or container before filling it with potable water? Recycled water trucks must be certified and registered to carry water for nonpotable uses only.

16. What if I have multiple tanker trucks?
All trucks must be inspected and registered with SBWR.

17. How much does recycled water cost?
Please contact your water retailer for prices and availability.

18. How do I report my recycled water usage and pay?
It will vary depending on recycled water retailer. Please see your local recycled water retailer for specifics.

8.c
Packet Pg. 201
Attachment: Construction Specifications and Bid Solicitation for Building M Roof Replacement Project (No. 24-SS) (CCC - Building M Roof Piercy Rd
Yerba Buena Rd at Mongomery Hilll Park
Corie Court
Spring Street and McKendrie
Los Esteros Rd
Hellyer Ave
Spring Street Guadalupe Gardens
Sources: Esri, DeLorme, NAVTEQ, TomTom, USGS, Intermap, iPC, NRCAN, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri (Thailand)

SAN JOSE RECYCLED WATER

TRUCK FILL LOCATIONS
Legend

RW TRUCK FILL ACCESS LOCATIONS

WATER RETAILER

SAN JOSE MUNICIPAL WATER

SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY
0 1 2 3 40.5
Miles
Los Esteros Rd Zanker Rd
Grand Bl
Disk Dr
Nortech Py
Baytech Dr
Oakland Rd
Schallenberger Rd
Pear Orchard Dr
880
Spring St
Ruff Dr
McKendrie St
Yerba Buena Rd
Verona Rd
Falls Creek Dr
Tuscany ClRural Access
Placido Ct
NB 101 ToCoyote Rp
Silver
Creek
Valley Rd
Fontanoso
Wy
Piercy Rd
For additional information call
South Bay Water Recycling (408) 277-3671
San Jose Municipal Water (408) 535-3500
San Jose Water Company (408) 279-7900
Corie Ct
Located 1,100 Feet South of Verona Rd
Los Esteros Station
Gates Open Monday Thru Friday
8:00 AM to 6:00 PM
Located 350 Feet South of Silver Creek Valley Rd
Taylor StEmory StAsbury St
Walnut St
Hedding St
University Av
Spring St
Emory St
Hellyer Av
Eden Park Pl
Piercy Rd
Jenny Ct
Hellyer Av
Silicon Valley
Blvd
Located 1,800 Feet West of Silicon Valley Blvd

8.c
Packet Pg. 202
Attachment: Construction Specifications and Bid Solicitation for Building M Roof Replacement Project Office Hrs:
8:00 am - 12:00 Noon
1:00 pm - 5:00 pm
(Noon - 1:00 pm, Ofc Closed for
SJMWS Staff Lunch Hour)

CITY OF SAN JOSE

MUNICIPAL WATER SYSTEM
3025 TUERS ROAD
SAN JOSE, CA 95121
(408) 277-3671
(408) 277- 4218

CITY OF SAN JOSE

LOS LAGOS

PUBLIC GOLF COURSE

LION FOODCTR

RITE AID

FOR TEMPORARY METERS - CALL & SCHEDULE A PICK-UP TIME

WITH AN ENGINEERING STAFF MEMBER BEFORE COMING TO PICK
UP A METER.

DEPOSIT OF $800 (CHECK OR CREDIT CARD) PER METER.
(3",Green)

8.c
Packet Pg. 203
Attachment: Construction Specifications and Bid Solicitation for Building M Roof Replacement Project (No. 24-SS) (CCC - Building M Roof 87 Guadalupe Fwy
W Taylor St
Spring St
W Hedding St
Coleman Ave
880 Nimitz Fwy
McKendrie St
Ruff Dr
Spring St
North Fill Location
Spring St
South Fill Location
Curie Ct
E Gish Rd
E Brokaw Rd
Oakland Rd
880 Nimitz Fwy
Old Bayshore Hwy
Curie Ct
Fill Location
San Jose Water Company
Recycled Water Fill Locations
Requirements for filling at any of the 3 locations
x San Jose Water Co. issued portable non-potable water meter. Deposit required upon receipt of meter. Call 408-279-7835 for more information. x Key to unlock cap.
x Certified non-potable water vehicle. Must be certified and permitted through South Bay Water Recycling.
x Non-potable hoses with 3" camlock fittings and a wrench to actuate valve. Must be supplied by consumer.

Recycled Water Meter Information:

San Jose Water Company
1251 S. Bascom Ave San Jose, CA
M - F 7:30 - 3:00
(Blue area, 4" & $1600 deposit)

8.c
Packet Pg. 204
Attachment: Construction Specifications and Bid Solicitation for Building M Roof Replacement Project

8.c
Packet Pg. 205
Attachment: Construction Specifications and Bid Solicitation for Building M Roof Replacement Project Revised 7/21/20 Page 1 of 2

RECYCLED WATER ACCESS POINT

PROGRAM USER AGREEMENT
PRODUCER: San Jose/Santa Clara Regional Wastewater Facility - 700 Los Esteros Road, San Jose CA 95134 REGULATORY AGENCY: South Bay Water Recycling - 3025 Tuers Road San Jose, CA 95121 - 408.277.3671 EFFECTIVE DATES OF PERMIT: ________________________________ THROUGH DECEMBER 31ST 2022 License #: SJ-________

USER INFO
TRAINEE NAME: ___________________________________ CSLB CONTRACTOR LICENSE #: __________________________ COMPANY NAME: ___________________________________ TRUCK/TRAILER LICENSE #: ____________________________ COMPANY ADDRESS: ___________________________________ ATTACH YOUR ACORD INSURANCE FORM TO THIS AGREEMENT COMPANY PHONE #: ___________________________________ PLEASE GIVE THIS AGREEMENT TO YOUR OFFICE MANAGER A USER AGREEMENT MUST BE COMPLETED FOR EACH VEHICLE OPERATOR AND MUST BE RETAINED DURING ACQUISITION AND APPLICATION OF RECYCLED WATER.

USERS AND USERS’ COMPANIES SHALL ADHERE TO THE ATTACHED SBWR TERMS OF USE. USER AGREEMENT IS SUBJECT TO RWQCB ORDER 95-117.

RECYCLED WATER USE INFORMATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY)
METHOD OF WATER DISTRIBUTION: [ ] RECYCLED WATER ACCESS POINT [ ] TEMPORARY SITE METER OTHER: _________________________ APPLICATION METHOD: [ ] TANKER TRUCK SPRAY [ ] HOSE O THER: ____________________________________________ USE OF RECYCLED WATER*: [ ] CONSTRUCTION (COMPACTION/DUST CONTROL) [ ] STREET SWEEPING [ ] S EWER CLEAN OUT OTHER*: ______________________________
* REFER TO THE FULL TEXT OF THE LATEST VERSION OF TITLE-22: CALIFORNIA WATER RECYCLING CRITERIA, ARTICLE 3. USES OF RECYCLED WATER, JUNE 18, 2014.

SIGNS REQUIRED: [ ] TANKER TRUCK [ ] CONTAINER [ ] OVERHEAD TANK [ ] PROJECT SITE OTHER: __________________ LOCATION WHERE RECYCLED WATER WILL BE APPLIED:

ADDRESS: ________________________________________ SITE SUPERINTENDENT: ___________________________________________

CERTIFICATION

I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THIS APPLICATION AND ALL ATTACHMENTS ARE TRUE, ACCURATE, AND COMPLETE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. I ALSO CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE SBWR TERMS OF USE AND ALL APPLICABLE RULES AND REGULATIONS OF THE RWQCB ORDER NO. 95-117 AND HAVE SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED INSPECTION BY THE LOCAL RETAILER. _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

TRUCK CONTRACTOR/DRIVER/EMPLOYEE SIGNATURE PRINTED NAME TITLE DATE _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ** SUPERINTENDENT OR FOREMAN SIGNATURE PRINTED NAME TITLE DATE

LYLE FROHMAN
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

SBWR SIGNATURE PRINTED NAME DATE

8.c
Packet Pg. 206
Attachment: Construction Specifications and Bid Solicitation for Building M Roof Replacement Project (No. 24-SS) (CCC - Building M Roof Revised 7/21/20 Page 2 of 2

RECYCLED WATER ACCESS POINT PROGRAM

PLEASE WASH YOUR HANDS AFTER USING RECYCLED WATER
CHECK THIS USER AGREEMENT LIMITS THE USE OF RECYCLED WATER TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:


1. RECYCLED WATER IS FOR NONPOTABLE USES
ONLY - NO DRINKING! Recycled water may not be exposed to food, used within designated eating areas or used within 50 feet of any domestic well, drinking fountain or potable water supply.


2. Th
ere shall be no cross-connection between recycled water and any potable water supply. Recycled water may not be pl
umbed into potable irrigation or onsite plumbing systems. Recycled water meters are prohibited from connec
ting to potable hydrants. Match purple to purple only


3. Recycled water may not be discharged into storm drains or outside the designated use area that was approved by the water retailer and/or SBWR. Overspray, pooling and runoff of recycled water is not permitted. Cover this in your Safety meetings.


4. Tanke
r trucks must maintain an air gap of at least twice the diameter of the fill pipe (i.e. water overflows the tank before reachi
ng the fill pipe). Tanker trucks must have water-tight connections, piping and hoses to ensure no leak
age will occur during fill-up or use. They must be fully drained before transport and prior to every connection.
 5. Rec
ycled water tanker trucks may not transport potable water for potable uses.  6. All
tanker trucks accessing and hauling recycled water must satisfy local and state safety requirements. Active auto/truck/trailer and general liability insurance (i.e. an ACORD form) is required. 

7. Recycled water meters may be inspected by the retailer for appropriate use at any time. The volume of recycled water used must be reported as specified by the recycled water retailer.

SPECIAL AP

PROVAL, TRAINING AND SITE INSPECTION REQUIRED
 8. If re
cycled water is transferred to other storage containers/reservoirs, they must be labeled with signage equivalent to tanker truck signage and must follow the safety guidelines in this User Agreement.  9. Rec
ycled water may be used for pressure washing and washing equipment and vehicles if the recycled water is not heated and where the general public is excluded from the washing process.  10. Rec
ycled Water may not be used for directional drilling without prior approval from SBWR.

ADVI

SORY SIGNS

Tanker Truck Sign: Tanker trucks hauling recycled water must have an SBWR approved adhesive sign issued by retailer at least six inches by twelve inches on the tank, in a location clearly visible to users and workers, with the following wording in one inch, or larger, letters on a purple background. 
Tanke
r Truck Inspection Decal: Tanker trucks hauling recycled water must have an SBWR approved adhesive decal issued b
y retailer at least three inches by six inches signifying that the tanker truck has passed inspection and met all SBWR requirements.

Appurtenan
ce Sign: Appurtenances serving recycled water must have an SBWR approved adhesive or bolted sign issued b
y the retailer at least six inches by eight inches, in a location clearly visible to users and workers, with the following wording in one inch, or larger, letters on a purple background.

8.c
Packet Pg. 207
Attachment: Construction Specifications and Bid Solicitation for Building M Roof Replacement Project (No. 24-SS) (CCC - Building M Roof

Appendix F:

California Prevailing Wage Rates

8.c
Packet Pg. 208
Attachment: Construction Specifications and Bid Solicitation for Building M Roof Replacement Project (No. 24-SS) (CCC - Building M Roof

GENERAL PREVAILING WAGE DETERMINATION MADE BY THE DIRECTOR OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA LABOR CODE PART 7, CHAPTER 1, ARTICLE 2, SECTIONS 1770, 1773 AND 1773.1

FOR COMMERCIAL BUILDING, HIGHWAY, HEAVY CONSTRUCTION AND DREDGING PROJECTS Craft: Carpenter#
Determination:

NC-23-31-1-2020-1
Issue Date:

August 22, 2020
Expiration date of determination:

June 30, 2021** The rate to be paid for work performed after this date has been determined. If work will extend past this date, the new rate must be paid and should be incorporated in contracts entered into now. Contact the Office of the Director - Research Unit for specific rates at (415) 703-4774.

Localities:

Area 1: All localities within Alameda, Contra Costa, Marin, Napa, San Francisco, San Mateo, Santa Clara, Solano, and Sonoma Counties.

Area 2: All localities within Monterey, San Benito, and Santa Cruz Counties.

Area 3: All localities within El Doradoa, Placera, Sacramento, San Joaquin and Yolo Counties.

Area 4: All localities within Alpine, Amador, Butte, Calaveras, Colusa, Del Norte, El Doradoa, Fresno, Glenn, Humboldt, Kings, Lake, Lassen, Madera, Mariposa, Mendocino, Merced, Modoc, Nevada, Placera, Plumas, Shasta, Sierra, Siskiyou, Stanislaus, Sutter, Tehama, Trinity, Tulare, Tuolumne, and Yuba Counties.

Wages and Employer Payments:

8.c
Packet Pg. 209
Attachment: Construction Specifications and Bid Solicitation for Building M Roof Replacement Project Determination: NC-023-31-1-2020-1

Page 2 of 11 ends

Classification
(Journeyperson)
Basic
Hourly
Rate
Health
and
Welfare
Pension Vacation
and
Holiday
b
Training Other
c
Hours Total
Hourly
Rate
Daily
Overtime
Hourly
Rate
(1 ½ X)
d e
Daily
Overtime
Hourly
Rate
(2 X)
d
Saturday
Overtime
Hourly
Rate
(1 ½ X)
d f g
Saturday
Overtime
Hourly
Rate
(2X)
d f
Sunday/
Holiday
Overtime
Hourly
Rate
(2 X)
d h
Hardwood
Floorlayer,
Power Saw
Operator, Saw
Filer, Shingler,
Steel Scaffold
And Steel
Shoring
Erector (Area
1)
$52.80 $11.70 $10.65 $5.09 $1.03 $2.64 8.0 $83.91 $110.31 $136.71 $110.31 $136.71 $136.71 Carpenter
(Area 2) $46.77 $11.70 $10.65 $5.09 $1.03 $2.64 8.0 $77.88 $101.265 $124.65 $101.265 $124.65 $124.65 Hardwood
Floorlayer,
Power Saw
Operator, Saw
Filer, Shingler,
Steel Scaffold
And Steel
Shoring
Erector (Area
2)
$46.92 $11.70 $10.65 $5.09 $1.03 $2.64 8.0 $78.03 $101.49 $124.95 $101.49 $124.95 $124.95 Carpenter
(Area 3) $46.77 $11.70 $10.65 $5.09 $1.03 $2.64 8.0 $77.88 $101.265 $124.65 $101.265 $124.65 $124.65

8.c
Packet Pg. 210
Attachment: Construction Specifications and Bid Solicitation for Building M Roof Replacement Project Determination: NC-023-31-1-2020-1

Page 3 of 11 ends

Classification
(Journeyperson)
Basic
Hourly
Rate
Health
and
Welfare
Pension Vacation
and
Holiday
b
Training Other
c
Hours Total
Hourly
Rate
Daily
Overtime
Hourly
Rate
(1 ½ X)
d e
Daily
Overtime
Hourly
Rate
(2 X)
d
Saturday
Overtime
Hourly
Rate
(1 ½ X)
d f g
Saturday
Overtime
Hourly
Rate
(2X)
d f
Sunday/
Holiday
Overtime
Hourly
Rate
(2 X)
d h
Hardwood
Floorlayer,
Power Saw
Operator, Saw
Filer, Shingler,
Steel Scaffold
And Steel
Shoring
Erector (Area
3)
$46.92 $11.70 $10.65 $5.09 $1.03 $2.64 8.0 $78.03 $101.49 $124.95 $101.49 $124.95 $124.95 Carpenter
(Area 4) $45.42 $11.70 $10.65 $5.09 $1.03 $2.64 8.0 $76.53 $99.24 $121.95 $99.24 $121.95 $121.95 Hardwood
Floorlayer,
Power Saw
Operator, Saw
Filer, Shingler,
Steel Scaffold
And Steel
Shoring
Erector (Area
4)
$45.57 $11.70 $10.65 $5.09 $1.03 $2.64 8.0 $76.68 $99.465 $122.25 $99.465 $122.25 $122.25

8.c
Packet Pg. 211
Attachment: Construction Specifications and Bid Solicitation for Building M Roof Replacement Project Determination: NC-023-31-1-2020-1

Page 4 of 11 ends

Wages and Employer Payments (2nd Shifti):

Classification
(Journeyperson)
(2nd Shift)
Basic
Hourly
Rate
Health
and
Welfare
Pension Vacation
and
Holiday
b
Training Other
c
Hours
j
Total
Hourly
Rate
Daily
Overtime
Hourly
Rate
(1 ½ X)
d k
Daily
Overtime
Hourly
Rate
(2 X)
d
Saturday
Overtime
Hourly
Rate
(1 ½ X)
d f g
Saturday
Overtime
Hourly
Rate
(2X)
d f
Sunday/
Holiday
Overtime
Hourly
Rate
(2 X)
d h
Carpenter (Area
1) $56.16 $11.70 $10.65 $5.09 $1.03 $2.64 7.5 $87.27 $110.09 $136.41 $110.09 $136.41 $136.41 Hardwood
Floorlayer,
Power Saw
Operator, Saw
Filer, Shingler,
Steel Scaffold
And Steel
Shoring Erector
(Area 1)
$56.32 $11.70 $10.65 $5.09 $1.03 $2.64 7.5 $87.43 $110.31 $136.71 $110.31 $136.71 $136.71 Carpenter (Area
2) $49.89 $11.70 $10.65 $5.09 $1.03 $2.64 7.5 $81.00 $101.27 $124.65 $101.27 $124.65 $124.65 Hardwood
Floorlayer,
Power Saw
Operator, Saw
Filer, Shingler,
Steel Scaffold
And Steel
Shoring Erector
(Area 2)
$50.05 $11.70 $10.65 $5.09 $1.03 $2.64 7.5 $81.16 $101.49 $124.95 $101.49 $124.95 $124.95 Carpenter (Area
3) $49.89 $11.70 $10.65 $5.09 $1.03 $2.64 7.5 $81.00 $101.27 $124.65 $101.27 $124.65 $124.65

8.c
Packet Pg. 212
Attachment: Construction Specifications and Bid Solicitation for Building M Roof Replacement Project Determination: NC-023-31-1-2020-1

Page 5 of 11 ends

Classification
(Journeyperson)
(2nd Shift)
Basic
Hourly
Rate
Health
and
Welfare
Pension Vacation
and
Holiday
b
Training Other
c
Hours
j
Total
Hourly
Rate
Daily
Overtime
Hourly
Rate
(1 ½ X)
d k
Daily
Overtime
Hourly
Rate
(2 X)
d
Saturday
Overtime
Hourly
Rate
(1 ½ X)
d f g
Saturday
Overtime
Hourly
Rate
(2X)
d f
Sunday/
Holiday
Overtime
Hourly
Rate
(2 X)
d h
Hardwood
Floorlayer,
Power Saw
Operator, Saw
Filer, Shingler,
Steel Scaffold
And Steel
Shoring Erector
(Area 3)
$50.05 $11.70 $10.65 $5.09 $1.03 $2.64 7.5 $81.16 $101.49 $124.95 $101.49 $124.95 $124.95 Carpenter (Area
4) $48.45 $11.70 $10.65 $5.09 $1.03 $2.64 7.5 $79.56 $99.24 $121.95 $99.24 $121.95 $121.95 Hardwood
Floorlayer,
Power Saw
Operator, Saw
Filer, Shingler,
Steel Scaffold
And Steel
Shoring Erector
(Area 4)
$48.61 $11.70 $10.65 $5.09 $1.03 $2.64 7.5 $79.72 $99.47 $122.25 $99.47 $122.25 $122.25 Wages and Employer Payments (3rd Shifti):

8.c
Packet Pg. 213
Attachment: Construction Specifications and Bid Solicitation for Building M Roof Replacement Project Determination: NC-023-31-1-2020-1

Page 6 of 11 ends

Classification
(Journeyperson)
(3rd Shift)
Basic
Hourly
Rate
Health
and
Welfare
Pension Vacation
and
Holiday
b
Training Other
c
Hours
j
Total
Hourly
Rate
Daily
Overtime
Hourly
Rate
(1 ½ X)
d k
Daily
Overtime
Hourly
Rate
(2 X)
d
Saturday
Overtime
Hourly
Rate
(1 ½ X)
d f g
Saturday
Overtime
Hourly
Rate
(2X)
d f
Sunday/
Holiday
Overtime
Hourly
Rate
(2 X)
d h
Hardwood
Floorlayer,
Power Saw
Operator, Saw
Filer, Shingler,
Steel Scaffold
And Steel
Shoring Erector
(Area 1)
$60.34 $11.70 $10.65 $5.09 $1.03 $2.64 7.0 $91.45 $110.31 $136.71 $110.31 $136.71 $136.71 Carpenter (Area
2) $53.45 $11.70 $10.65 $5.09 $1.03 $2.64 7.0 $84.56 $101.27 $124.65 $101.27 $124.65 $124.65 Hardwood
Floorlayer,
Power Saw
Operator, Saw
Filer, Shingler,
Steel Scaffold
And Steel
Shoring Erector
(Area 2)
$53.62 $11.70 $10.65 $5.09 $1.03 $2.64 7.0 $84.73 $101.49 $124.95 $101.49 $124.95 $124.95 Carpenter (Area
3) $53.45 $11.70 $10.65 $5.09 $1.03 $2.64 7.0 $84.56 $101.27 $124.65 $101.27 $124.65 $124.65 Hardwood
Floorlayer,
Power Saw
Operator, Saw
Filer, Shingler,
Steel Scaffold
And Steel
Shoring Erector
(Area 3)
$53.62 $11.70 $10.65 $5.09 $1.03 $2.64 7.0 $84.73 $101.49 $124.95 $101.49 $124.95 $124.95

8.c
Packet Pg. 214
Attachment: Construction Specifications and Bid Solicitation for Building M Roof Replacement Project Determination: NC-023-31-1-2020-1

Page 7 of 11 ends

NC-23-31-1-2020-1A
Issue Date:

August 22, 2020
Expiration date of determination:

Localities:

All Localities within Alameda, Alpine, Amador, Butte, Calaveras, Colusa, Contra Costa, Del Norte, El Dorado, Fresno, Glenn, Humboldt, Kings, Lake, Lassen, Madera, Marin, Mariposa, Mendocino, Merced, Modoc, Monterey, Napa, Nevada, Placer, Plumas, Sacramento, San Benito, San Francisco, San Joaquin, San Mateo, Santa Clara, Santa Cruz, Shasta, Sierra, Siskiyou, Solano, Sonoma, Stanislaus, Sutter, Tehama, Trinity, Tulare, Tuolumne, Yolo, and Yuba Counties.

8.c
Packet Pg. 215
Attachment: Construction Specifications and Bid Solicitation for Building M Roof Replacement Project Determination: NC-023-31-1-2020-1

Page 8 of 11 ends

Wages and Employer Payments:

Classification
(Journeyperson)
Basic
Hourly
Rate
Health
and
Welfare
Pension Vacation
and
Holiday
b
Training Other
c
Hours. Total
Hourly
Rate
Daily
Overtime
Hourly
Rate
(1 ½ X)
d e
Daily
Overtime
Hourly
Rate
(2 X)
d
Saturday
Overtime
Hourly
Rate
(1 ½ X)
d f g
Saturday
Overtime
Hourly
Rate
(2X)
d f
Sunday /
Holiday
Overtime
Hourly
Rate
(2 X)
d h
Bridge Builder/
Highway
Carpenter
$52.65 $11.70 $10.65 $5.09 $1.03 $2.64 8.0 $83.76 $110.085 $136.41 $110.085 $136.41 $136.41 Bridge Builder/
Highway
Carpenter
(Special Single
Shift)
$59.23 $11.70 $10.65 $5.09 $1.03 $2.64 8.0 $90.34 $119.955 $149.57 $119.955 $149.57 $149.57 Wages and Employer Payments (2nd Shifti):

8.c
Packet Pg. 216
Attachment: Construction Specifications and Bid Solicitation for Building M Roof Replacement Project Determination: NC-023-31-1-2020-1

Page 9 of 11 ends

Bridge
Builder/Highway
Carpenter
$60.17 $11.70 $10.65 $5.09 $1.03 $2.64 7.0 $91.28 $110.09 $136.41 $110.09 $136.41 $136.41 Determination:

NC-23-31-1-2020-1B
Issue Date:

August 22, 2020
Expiration date of determination:

Localities:

Area 1: All localities within Alameda, Contra Costa, Marin, Napa, San Francisco, San Mateo, Santa Clara, Solano, and Sonoma Counties.

Area 2: All localities within Monterey, San Benito, and Santa Cruz Counties.

Area 3: All localities within El Doradoa, Placera, Sacramento, San Joaquin and Yolo Counties.

Wages and Employer Payments:

Classification
(Journeyperson)
Basic
Hourly
Rate
Health
and
Welfare
Pension Vacation
and
Holiday
b
Training Other
l
Hours Total
Hourly
Rate
Daily
Overtime
Hourly
Rate
(1 ½ X)
d e
Daily
Overtime
Hourly
Rate
(2 X)
d
Saturday
Overtime
Hourly
Rate
(1 ½ X)
d f g
Saturday
Overtime
Hourly
Rate
(2X)
d f
Sunday /
Holiday
Overtime
Hourly
Rate
(2 X)
d h
Millwright
(Area 1) $52.75 $11.70 $10.65 $5.18 $1.03 $4.15 8.0 $85.46 $111.835 $138.21 $111.835 $138.21 $138.21 Millwright
(Area 2) $49.27 $11.70 $10.65 $5.18 $1.03 $4.15 8.0 $81.98 $106.615 $131.25 $106.615 $131.25 $131.25 Millwright
(Area 3) $49.27 $11.70 $10.65 $5.18 $1.03 $4.15 8.0 $81.98 $106.615 $131.25 $106.615 $131.25 $131.25 Millwright
(Area 4) $47.92 $11.70 $10.65 $5.18 $1.03 $4.15 8.0 $80.63 $104.59 $128.55 $104.59 $128.55 $128.55

8.c
Packet Pg. 217
Attachment: Construction Specifications and Bid Solicitation for Building M Roof Replacement Project Determination: NC-023-31-1-2020-1

Page 10 of 11 ends

Wages and Employer Payments (2nd Shifti):

Classification
(Journeyperson)
(2nd Shift)
Basic
Hourly
Rate
Health
and
Welfare
Pension Vacation
and
Holiday
b
Training Other
l
Hours
j
Total
Hourly
Rate
Daily
Overtime
Hourly
Rate
(1 ½ X)
d k
Daily
Overtime
Hourly
Rate
(2 X)
d
Saturday
Overtime
Hourly
Rate
(1 ½ X)
d
f g
Saturday
Overtime
Hourly
Rate
(2X)
d f
Sunday/
Holiday
Overtime
Hourly
Rate
(2 X)
d h
Millwright
(Area 1) $56.27 $11.70 $10.65 $5.18 $1.03 $4.15 7.5 $88.98 $111.84 $138.21 $111.84 $138.21 $138.21 Millwright
(Area 2) $52.55 $11.70 $10.65 $5.18 $1.03 $4.15 7.5 $85.26 $106.62 $131.25 $106.62 $131.25 $131.25 Millwright
(Area 3) $52.55 $11.70 $10.65 $5.18 $1.03 $4.15 7.5 $85.26 $106.62 $131.25 $106.62 $131.25 $131.25 Millwright
(Area 4) $51.11 $11.70 $10.65 $5.18 $1.03 $4.15 7.5 $83.82 $104.59 $128.55 $104.59 $128.55 $128.55 Wages and Employer Payments (3rd Shifti):

Classification
(Journeyperson)
(3rd Shift)
Basic
Hourly
Rate
Health
and
Welfare
Pension Vacation
and
Holiday
b
Training Other
l
Hours
j
Total
Hourly
Rate
Daily
Overtime
Hourly
Rate
(1 ½ X)
d k
Daily
Overtime
Hourly
Rate
(2 X)
d
Saturday
Overtime
Hourly
Rate
(1 ½ X)
d f g
Saturday
Overtime
Hourly
Rate
(2X)
d f
Sunday/
Holiday
Overtime
Hourly
Rate
(2 X)
d h
Millwright
(Area 1) $60.29 $11.70 $10.65 $5.18 $1.03 $4.15 7.0 $93.00 $111.84 $138.21 $111.84 $138.21 $138.21 Millwright
(Area 2) $56.31 $11.70 $10.65 $5.18 $1.03 $4.15 7.0 $89.02 $106.62 $131.25 $106.62 $131.25 $131.25 Millwright
(Area 3) $56.31 $11.70 $10.65 $5.18 $1.03 $4.15 7.0 $89.02 $106.62 $131.25 $106.62 $131.25 $131.25 Millwright
(Area 4) $54.77 $11.70 $10.65 $5.18 $1.03 $4.15 7.0 $87.48 $104.59 $128.55 $104.59 $128.55 $128.55 Recognized holidays:

Holidays upon which the general prevailing hourly wage rate for Holiday work shall be paid, shall be all holidays in the collective bargaining agreement, applicable to the particular craft, classification, or type of worker employed on the project, which is on file with the Director of Industrial Relations. If the prevailing rate is not based on a collectively bargained rate, the holidays upon which the prevailing rate shall be paid shall be as provided in Section 6700 of the Government Code. You may obtain the holiday provisions for the current determinations on the

8.c
Packet Pg. 218
Attachment: Construction Specifications and Bid Solicitation for Building M Roof Replacement Project Determination: NC-023-31-1-2020-1

Page 11 of 11 ends

Director's General Prevailing Wage Determinations Website (http://www.dir.ca.gov/OPRL/DPreWageDetermination.htm). Holiday provisions for current or superseded determinations may be obtained by contacting the Office of the Director – Research Unit at (415) 703-4774.

Travel and/or subsistence payment:

In accordance with Labor Code Sections 1773.1 and 1773.9, contractors shall make travel and/or subsistence payments to each worker to execute the work. You may obtain the travel and/or subsistence provisions for the current determinations on the Director's General Prevailing Wage Determinations Website (http://www.dir.ca.gov/OPRL/DPreWageDetermination.htm). Travel and/or subsistence requirements for current or superseded determinations may be obtained by contacting the Office of the Director – Research Unit at (415) 703-4774. # Indicates an apprenticeable craft. The current apprentice wage rates are available on the Prevailing Wage Apprentice Determinations Website (http://www.dir.ca.gov/OPRL/PWAppWage/PWAppWageStart.asp). a Area 3 includes the portion of Placer County west of and including Highway 49 and the portion of El Dorado County west of and including Highway 49 and the territory inside the city limits of Placerville. Area 4 includes the portions of Placer and El Dorado Counties not covered in Area 3.
b Includes an amount per hour worked for Work Fees. The Vacation amount is $2.95 per hour worked for Carpenter; $2.85 per hour worked for Millwright.
c Includes Annuity Trust Fund, Industry Promotion, Carpenters International Training Fund, Work Preservation, Carpenter Employers Contract Administration, and Vacation/Holiday/Sick Leave Admin.
d The overtime rates for shift work are based on the non-shift overtime rates. e For building construction, rate applies to the first 4 hours daily overtime. For all heavy, highway and engineering construction overtime worked, Monday through Friday, rate applies to the first 4 hours daily overtime. f In the event that work cannot be performed Monday through Friday because of inclement weather or major mechanical breakdown, employees may voluntarily make up such day on Saturday and shall be paid at the applicable straight time rates. g Rate applies to the first 8 hours for building construction and for the first 10 hours worked on heavy, highway and engineering construction. h Time and one-half shall be paid for the first eight (8) hours worked on the four (4) days of each year selected by the Union as designated off/holidays listed in the Holiday Provision.
i Does not apply to tenant improvement or renovation projects in occupied buildings with a total contract value of $5 million or less. j Daily overtime applies after 7 ½ hours worked at the straight-time rate for second shift and after 7 hours worked at the straight-time rate for third shift.
k For building construction, rate applies to the first 2 hours prior to the start of the regular or approved day, or the first 4 hours after the end of the approved or regular work day, not to exceed a total of 4 hours in any 1 work day. For heavy, highway and engineering construction rate applies to the first 4 hours prior to the start of the regular or approved day, or the first 4 hours after the end of the approved or regular work day, not to exceed a total of 4 hours in any 1 work day l Millwright Annuity Trust Fund, Industry Promotion, Carpenters International Training Fund, Work Preservation, and Vacation/Holiday/Sick Leave Admin.

8.c
Packet Pg. 219
Attachment: Construction Specifications and Bid Solicitation for Building M Roof Replacement Project

Appendix G:

California Public Contract Code Section 9204

8.c
Packet Pg. 220
Attachment: Construction Specifications and Bid Solicitation for Building M Roof Replacement Project (No. 24-SS) (CCC - Building M Roof

8.c
Packet Pg. 221
Attachment: Construction Specifications and Bid Solicitation for Building M Roof Replacement Project (No. 24-SS) (CCC - Building M Roof

8.c
Packet Pg. 222
Attachment: Construction Specifications and Bid Solicitation for Building M Roof Replacement Project (No. 24-SS) (CCC - Building M Roof

8.c
Packet Pg. 223
Attachment: Construction Specifications and Bid Solicitation for Building M Roof Replacement Project (No. 24-SS) (CCC - Building M Roof

8.c
Packet Pg. 224
Attachment: Construction Specifications and Bid Solicitation for Building M Roof Replacement Project (No. 24-SS) (CCC - Building M Roof

Appendix H:

Site Map

8.c
Packet Pg. 225
Attachment: Construction Specifications and Bid Solicitation for Building M Roof Replacement Project (No. 24-SS) (CCC - Building M Roof

8.c
Packet Pg. 226
Attachment: Construction Specifications and Bid Solicitation for Building M Roof Replacement Project

CONTRACT

BETWEEN CITY OF CAMPBELL
AND
______________ TBD____________________

FOR CONSTRUCTION OF
CAMPBELL COMMUNITY CENTER BUILDING M ROOF REPLACEMENT, PROJECT 24-SS THIS AGREEMENT, made and concluded in duplicate, this __ TBD___, day of ______________________, ____2024______ by and
between______TBD____________________ hereinafter referred to as "CONTRACTOR", and the City of Campbell, a Municipal Corporation, hereinafter referred to as "CITY":

ARTICLE I. WITNESSETH: That for and in consideration of the payments and agreements hereinafter mentioned, to be made and performed by CITY, and under the conditions expressed in the two (2) bonds, bearing event date with these presents, and hereunto annexed, the CONTRACTOR agrees with the CITY, at his own proper cost and expense, to do all the work and furnish all plant, labor, services, tools, equipment, supplies, transportation, utilities, and materials, except such as are mentioned in the Specificatio ns to be furnished by the CITY, necessary to construct and complete to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, in accordance with this Contract, the Notice Inviting Bids, the accepted Bid Proposal, the Plans, the Special Provisions, the City of Campbell Standard Specifications and Details for Public Works Construction dated July 1994, and by reference therein to the City of San Jose Standard Specifications, the City of San Jose Standard Details, the State Standard Specifications, the State Standard Plans, and the Equipment Rental Rates of the California Department of Transportation and the General Prevailing Wage Rates, each of which documents are on file in the office of the City Clerk and all of which are hereby specifically referred to and by such reference made a part hereof.

The work to be done is shown upon the project plans and specifications entitled, CAMPBELL COMMUNITY CENTER BUILING M ROOF REPLACEMENT, PROJECT 24-SS , which said project plans, specifications, and referenced specifications are hereby made a part of this Contract.

ARTICLE II. The CITY hereby promises and agrees with the CONTRACTOR to employ, and does hereby employ, the CONTRACTOR to provide the materials and to do the work according to the terms and conditions herein contained and referred to, for the price aforesaid, and hereby contracts to pay the same at the time, and in the manner and upon the conditions herein set forth; and the CITY and the CONTRACTOR, for themselves, their heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns, do hereby agree to the full p erformance of the covenants herein contained.

ARTICLE III. The CONTRACTOR agrees to receive and accept the prices indicated in the Contractor's signed proposal as full compensation for furnishing all materials and for doing all the work contemplated and embraced in this Contract; also for all loss or damage, ar ising out of the nature of the work aforesaid, or from the action of the elements, or from any unforeseen difficulties or obstructions which may arise or be encountered in the prosecution of the work until its acceptance by the CITY, and for all risks connected with the work; also for all expenses incurred by or in consequence of the suspension or discontinuance of work and for well and faithfully completing the work, and the whole thereof, in the manner and according to the Plans and Specifications, and the requirements of the Engineer, and also for furnishing the required bonds and insurance, and for doing all other things mentioned, contemplated or embraced in this agreement, and the contract documents.

8.d
Packet Pg. 227
Attachment: Contract Services Agreement for CCC – Building M Roof Replacement (Sample) (CCC - Building M Roof Replacement Project (No.

ARTICLE IV . In accordance with the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code, the Contractor will be required to secure the payment of worker's compensation to his employees.

ARTICLE V. By my signature hereunder, as CONTRACTOR, I certify that I am aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which requires every employer to be insured against liability for Workers' Compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work of this Contract.

ARTICLE VI . The improvement contemplated in the performance of this Contract is an improvement over which the CITY shall exercise general supervision. The CITY shall have the right to assume full and direct control over this Contract whenever the CITY, at its sole discretion, shall determine that its responsibility to the United States or the State of California so requires.

ARTICLE VII. The general prevailing wage rates as heretofore specified, and any minimum wage rates indicated in the Special Provisions are hereby specifically referred to and by this reference are made a part of this Contract. It is further expressly agreed by and between the parties hereto that should there be any conflict between the terms of this instrument and the Bid or Proposal of CONTRACTOR, then this instrument shall control and nothing herein shall be considered as an acceptance of said terms of said Proposal conflicting herewith.

ARTICLE VIII. Contractor shall be responsible for complying with the provisions of California Labor Code Section 1771.1(a) which states: A contractor or subcontractor shall not be qualified to bid on, be listed in a bid proposal, subject to the requirements of Sectio n 4104 of the Public Contract Code, or engage in the performance of any contract for public work, as defined in this chapter, unless currently registered and qualified to perform public work pursuant to Section 1725.5. It is not a violation of this section for an unregistered contractor to submit a bid that is authorized by Section 7029.1 of the Business and Professions Code or by Section 10164 or 20103.5 of the Public Contract Code, provided the contractor is registered to perform public work pursuant to Section 1725.5 at the time the contract is awarded.

ARTICLE IX . Contractor and any subcontractors under the Constructor shall comply with Section 1775 of the California Labor Code regarding prevailing wages.

ARTICLE X. Contractor shall be responsible for complying with the provisions of Section 1776 of the California Labor Code concerning payroll records, as more specifically described in Section 7-1.01A(3) of the City of San Jose Standard Specifications.

ARTICLE XI. Contractor shall be responsible for complying with the provisions of California Labor Code Sections 1777.5 through 1777.7, inclusive, concerning apprentices, as more specifically described in Section 7-1.01A(5) of the City of San Jose Standard Specifications.

ARTICLE XII. Contractor shall be responsible for complying with the provisions of California Labor Code Sections 1810 through 1815, inclusive, concerning working hours, as more specifically described in Section 7-1.01A(1) of the City of San Jose Standard Specifications.

ARTICLE XIII. Contractor's attention is directed to Section 7 -1.01E of the City of San Jose Standard Specifications, regarding trench excavation.

ARTICLE XIV . In accordance with Section 8 -1.07 of the City of San Jose Standard Specifications, the sum of Three Thousand Six Hundred Dollars and Zero Cents ($3,600.00) will be assessed as liquidated damages for each and every calendar day's delay in finishing the work

8.d
Packet Pg. 228
Attachment: Contract Services Agreement for CCC – Building M Roof Replacement (Sample) (CCC - Building M Roof Replacement Project (No. in excess of the number of working days prescribed. Liquidated damages for non -compliance with the requirements in Section 8 “Prosecution & Progress”, and under Section 10 -2 “Traffic Control and Public Safety”.

The City further agrees that the Contractor shall not be assessed liquidated damages for delay in completion of the project, when such delay was caused by the failure of the City or the owner of the utility to move or relocate such utility facilities as se t forth in California Government Code Section 4215.

ARTICLE XV. Contractor shall be responsible for complying with the provisions of California Public Contracts Code Section 7104 regarding trenching and excavations that extend deeper than four (4) feet below the surface. No change order issued pursuant to California Public Contracts Code Section 7104 shall provide for any increase in compensation that would exceed the recovery allowed pursuant to Section 7 of the Special Provisions.

ARTICLE XVI. The City of Campbell shall notify Contractor of the receipt of any third -party claim relating to this contract within 30 days of receipt. The City of Campbell may recover its reasonable costs incurred in providing such notification, pursuant to subdivision (c) of Public Contract Code Section 9201. Notwithstanding this notification provision, the City of Campbell reserves its full authority to compromise or otherwise settle any claim relating to this contract at any time.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties of these present have hereunto set their hands the year and date first above written and having fully read and understood the terms and conditions of this contract, acknowledge their agreement to be bound thereby.

CONTRACTOR
By: ____________________________
Title: ____________________________
(Attach Contractor's Notary Acknowledgment)

CITY OF CAMPBELL
By: _____________________________________
Title: _________________________________________
ATTEST:
____________________________
Andrea Sanders, City Clerk

8.d
Packet Pg. 229
Attachment: Contract Services Agreement for CCC – Building M Roof Replacement (Sample) (CCC - Building M Roof Replacement Project (No.

City
Council
Report

TITLE: Authorization to Extend Agreement for Campbell Safe Routes to School Maps Project (CIP No. 22-OO) (Resolution/Roll Call Vote)

RECOMMENDED ACTION

That the City Council adopt a resolution approving an amendment to the consultant services agreement with Alta Planning + Design, Inc. for the Campbell Safe Routes to School Maps Project in an amount not to exceed $86,000 and authorizing the City Manager to execute said amendment.

BACKGROUND

The Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) Bicycle & Pedestrian Education and Encouragement (Bike/Ped E&E) Program covers activities and the development and distribution of materials that are designed and intended to satisfy the following goals: 1) promote, educate, and/or encourage safe walking or bicycling for residents or visitors of every age and ability; 2) communicate to residents and visitors the benefits of walking and bicycling; 3) communicate to school children, residents, and visitors the rights and responsibilities of pedestrians, bicyclists, and motorists.

The Campbell Safe Routes to School (SRTS) Maps Project is funded with 2016 Measure B funds for the Bike/Ped E&E Program. This project involves preparing school route maps for elementary and middle schools in Campbell Union School District (CUSD). Phase 1 of the project originally included Castlemont Elementary School, Forest Hill Elementary School, and Rolling Hills Elementary School. At the request of San Jose staff, the scope of work was changed to replace Forest Hill Elementary School with Rosemary Elementary School.

On January 3, 2023, the Public Works Department issued a Request for Proposals (RFP) and solicited proposals from three bidders for Phase 1 of the project. On January 27, 2023, proposals were due. The City received only the proposal from Alta Planning + Design, Inc. to prepare the school route maps for $70,510.

On March 21, 2023, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 12954 authorizing the City Manager to award the contract to and execute the consultant services agreement with Alta Planning + Design, Inc. (Alta), for the Campbell Safe Routes to School Maps Project.

Item: 9
Category: CONSENT CALENDAR
Meeting Date: January 22, 2024
9 Packet Pg. 230
Authorization to Extend Agreement for Campbell Safe Routes to School Maps Project Page 2 of 4

DISCUSSION
Campbell Safe Routes to School Maps Project Scope
Phase 1 walk audits and face -to-face meetings with school parents and school staff liaisons have been completed for Castlemont Elementary School, Forest Hill Elementary School, and Rolling Hills Elementary School . Staff is waiting for Alta’s draft maps and recommendations to be submitted for review. The project is scheduled to be completed by the end of February 2024. After school maps are distributed, staff will follow up with a survey in late 2024 to determine how many students shifted from being driven to school to walking and bicycling to school.

Both the City of San Jose and the Town of Los Gatos contributed funding to this (phase 1) project through separate cost sharing agreements in the amounts of $25,000 and $11,000 respectively.

Phase 2 of this project would include Forest Hill Elementary School and Campbell School of Innovation. Phase 2 of the project would be managed by Campbell Public Works staff in partnership with CUSD, City of San Jose Department of Transportation (SJ DOT), and County Public Health Department (PHD). Since this project also will provide benefit to the City of San Jose, a separate funding agreement will also be prepared to recognize their contribution. This will be done at a date yet to be determined.

Phase 3 of this project would include Capri Elementary School and Village School.

Phase 3 of the project would include the Town of Los Gatos and would not include SJ DOT. A separate funding agreement will be prepared at that time.

Extending the Agreement with Alta Planning + Design, Inc. (Alta) Alta has shown it has the expertise to engage project partners and prepare safe routes to school maps. Alta was the only consultant to submit a proposal for the Phase 1 project. Alta has good working relationships with project partners and has an established methodology for conducting walk audits and engaging with school officials and parents. Alta worked closely with Campbell staff in preparing map designs and web tools. Retaining Alta would save time and allow the remaining phases to begin without having to prepare and issue another RFP.

Alta’s Phase 1 agreement is for $70,510. Alta indicated that adding two schools to the scope of work would cost approximately $42,000 for Phase 2. Assuming Phase 3 may cost $44,000 (approximately 5% higher to account for an annual adjustment), the total cost of both Phases 2 and 3 would be approximately $86,000.

Based on the City’s Purchasing Policy, retaining consultant services in excess of $50,000 may be approved by the City Council as outlined in Section 3.20.091 (3)(B) when the City Council determines that the quality, availability or capability is overriding 9 Packet Pg. 231
Authorization to Extend Agreement for Campbell Safe Routes to School Maps Project Page 3 of 4 in relation to price in procurement of research, development, technical supplies or services. In this instance, Alta was the only firm that submitted a proposal to the original request. Issuing another request for proposal s will not likely result in additional contractors who are available to perform the work prior to the end of the school year.

Alta is available to perform the necessary work at the schedule the City desires.

Therefore, staff recommends that the City Council approve amending Alta’s agreement for the Campbell Safe Routes to School Maps Project to include both Phases 2 and 3.

The City has accumulated $119,264.96 in 2016 Measure B Bike/Ped E&E Program funds in Project 22-OO and an additional $84,375.46 in 2016 Measure B Bike/Ped E&E Program funds in the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) in Project 23 -QQ to cover the cost of consultant services and staff costs for all three project phases. The total amount of available funds is $203,640.42.

Should the City Council authorize extending Alta’s contract to include Phases 2 and 3, the extension would be for an amount not to exceed $86,000 and the total contract amount would be $156,510. The $203,640.42 in 2016 Measure B Bike/Ped E&E Program funds would be sufficient to cover Phase 2 and Phase 3 consultant services and staff costs for all three phases.

Tentative Schedule
The tentative schedule is as follows.

Phase 1 Completion February 2024
Phase 2 (Forest Hill Elementary School, Campbell School of Innovation) March-December 2024
Phase 3 (Capri Elementary School, Village School) March-December 2025.

FISCAL IMPACT
Extending Alta’s contract should not result in any direct fiscal impact to the City . No local match is required for the use of 2016 Measure B Bike/Ped E&E Program funds.

ALTERNATIVES

1. Do not extend Alta’s consultant services contract. Advertise the Phase 2 Project for formal bids. This alternative is not recommended as only one consultant submitted a proposal for the Phase 1 Project.

2. Extend Alta’s consultant services contract only for Phase 2. This alternative is not recommended since it would delay the commencement of Phase 3. 9 Packet Pg. 232
Authorization to Extend Agreement for Campbell Safe Routes to School Maps Project Page 4 of 4 Prepared by:

Matthew Jue, Traffic Engineer
Reviewed by:

Todd Capurso, Director of Public Works
Approved by:

Brian Loventhal, City Manager
Attachment:
a. Resolution
b. Alta Letter Proposal Campbell SRTS Mapping Phase 2
9 Packet Pg. 233

RESOLUTION NO. ___________

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CAMPBELL

AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO AMEND THE CONTRACT WITH ALTA PLANNING + DESIGN TO PROVIDE CONSULTANT SERVICES FOR THE

CAMPBELL SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL MAPS PROJECT

WHEREAS, the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) Bicycle & Pedestrian Education and Encouragement (Bike/Ped E&E) Program covers activities and the development and distribution of materials that are designed and intended to satisfy the following goals: 1) promote, educate, and/or encourage safe walking or bicycling for residents or visitors of every age and ability; 2) communicate to residents and visitors the benefits of walking and bicycling; 3) communicate to school children, residents, and visitors the rights and responsibilities of pedestrians, bicyclists, and motorists; and

WHEREAS, the Campbell Safe Routes to School (SRTS) Maps Project is funded with 2016 Measure B funds for the Bike/Ped E&E Program.

WHEREAS, this project w ould create school route maps for elementary and middle schools in Campbell Union School District (CUSD); and

WHEREAS, Phase 1 of this project includes Castlemont Elementary School, Rosemary Elementary School, and Rolling Hills Elementary School; and

WHEREAS, on January 3, 2023, the Public Works Department issued a Request for Proposals (RFP) and solicited proposals from three bidders for Phase 1 of the project; and

WHEREAS, the City received only the proposal from Alta Planning + Design, Inc. (Alta) to prepare the school route maps for $70,510; and

WHEREAS, on March 21, 2023, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 12954 authorizing the City Manager to award the contract to and execute the consultant services agreement with Alta for the Campbell Safe Routes to School Maps Project; and

WHEREAS, Phase 1 of the project is scheduled to be completed by the end of February 2024; and

WHEREAS, Phase 2 of this project would include Forest Hill Elementary School and Campbell School of Innovation; and

WHEREAS, Phase 3 of this project would include Capri Elementary School and Village School; and

WHEREAS, Alta has shown it has the expertise to engage project partners and prepare safe routes to school maps; and

9.a
Packet Pg. 234
Attachment: Resolution (Authorization to Extend Agreement for Campbell Safe Routes to School Maps Project) WHEREAS, r etaining Alta is available and would save time and allow the remaining phases to begin without having to prepare and issue another RFP; and WHEREAS, the City Council , pursuant to Campbell Municipal Code Section

3.20.091(3)(B), finds that the availability of ALTA is overriding in relation to price in procurement of technical services for Phase 2 and 3; and WHEREAS, staff recommends extending Alta’s agreement for the Campbell Safe Routes to School Maps Project to include Phases 2 and 3; and
WHEREAS, extending Alta’s contract to include Phases 2 and 3 would cost approximately $86,000 in addition to the current contract; and WHEREAS, the cost estimate for Alta to complete all three phases of the project is $156,510; and
WHEREAS, the total amount of 2016 Measure B Bike/Ped E&E Program funds available in Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) Projects 22-OO and 23-QQ amounts is $203,640.42; and
WHEREAS, these funds are sufficient to cover the cost of consultant services and staff costs for all three project phases; and
WHEREAS, extending Alta’s consultant services contract should not result in any direct fiscal impact to the City; and
WHEREAS, no local match is required for the use of 2016 Measure B Bike/Ped E&E Program funds.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Campbell does hereby approve an extension to the contract for Alta Planning + Design, Inc. to complete Phases 2 and 3 for an amount not to exceed $ 86,000, and authorize the that the City Manager to execute said contract.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 22nd day of January, 2024, by the following roll call vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

APPROVED:
_______________________________
Susan M. Landry, Mayor
ATTEST:
___________________________
Andrea Sanders, City Clerk

9.a
Packet Pg. 235
Attachment: Resolution (Authorization to Extend Agreement for Campbell Safe Routes to School Maps Project)

304 12th Street, Suite 2A
Oakland, CA 94607
(510) 540-5008 | altago.com

1 November 14, 2023
Matthew Jue
City of Campbell | Public Works Department
70 N. First Street
Campbell, CA 95008

RE: City of Campbell SRTS Mapping Phase 2
Dear Matthew,

On behalf of Alta Planning + Design (Alta), I am pleased to submit this proposal to the City of Campbell to assist with Safe Routes to School Mapping for two more schools in the Spring of 2024.

I will serve as Principal-in-Charge to ensure effective allocation of resources and implement quality control. Charlie Simpson will serve as the Project Manager and your first point of contact in charge of coordinating tasks and production staff.

A scope of work and fee to complete this task is included with this letter for your consideration. I hope we have the opportunity to work together. If you have any questions about our proposal, please contact me at (503) 200-3276 or at [email protected].

Sincerely,

Hannah Day-Kapell
Principal
Alta Planning + Design, Inc.

9.b
Packet Pg. 236
Attachment: Alta Letter Proposal Campbell SRTS Mapping Phase 2 (Authorization to Extend Agreement for Campbell Safe Routes to School 304 12th Street, Suite 2A
Oakland, CA 94607
(510) 540-5008 | altago.com
2 Scope of Services
Task 1: Project Management
Task 1.1: Project Kick-off Meeting
Alta will schedule a virtual kick-off meeting with the City, partner agencies, and the Campbell Union School District to discuss the following:
• Project objectives, timeline, and scope of work
• Expectations and requirements from each partner agency • Data needs/expectations
• Ongoing project management (Task 1.2)
• Next steps and action items
Task 1.2: Project Management
Alta will coordinate project activities, monitor progress on deliverables, and provide quality control and assurance on materials developed. Throughout the project, there will be ongoing coordination between Alta and the City of Campbell project team. Alta Project Manager Charlie Simpson will be in regular communication with the City of Campbell, Campbell Union School District, and other partner agencies, including email, video chat, and phone communications. We propose to hold up to 12 (12) 30-minute biweekly virtual team calls to see that the project stays on schedule, within budget, and continues to meet expectations. Meetings may be less frequent during slower production times (i.e., summer). Alta will prepare agendas prior to each meeting and will provide minutes after each meeting.

Alta will prepare monthly invoices with brief summaries of progress on each task during the invoice period.

Task 1 Deliverables:
• Project kick-off meeting
• Biweekly check-in meetings with agendas and minutes
• Monthly invoices
Task 2: Data Collection and Analysis
Task 2.1: Review Existing Documents and Data and Site Review In preparation for the School Walking and Rolling Audits (Task 2.2), Alta will review existing conditions at each of the two school locations to analyze existing infrastructure and environmental conditions that may serve as challenges or

9.b
Packet Pg. 237
Attachment: Alta Letter Proposal Campbell SRTS Mapping Phase 2 (Authorization to Extend Agreement for Campbell Safe Routes to School

304 12th Street, Suite 2A
Oakland, CA 94607
(510) 540-5008 | altago.com

3 barriers to safe walking, biking, rolling, vehicle, or transit access to school areas. Alta will also review relevant documents, including previously made route maps, to further deepen our knowledge of existing travel conditions at each campus.

The review will include the following items (completion of specific analyses is dependent on available data):
• Collision history (most recent ten years available)
• Current school route maps
• Draft General Plan 2040
• Other local and regional planning documents
• Prior walking and bicycling audits
• Student enrollment heatmaps
• Review of existing infrastructure (sidewalks and paths, crossings, bikeways, transit access, signage, striping, etc.) In conjunction with the desktop data review, Alta will request City and District GIS information to review current and existing projects and plans. If needed, Alta will prepare and submit a Data Request Memo that will ask the City, District, and other partners for any relevant information. This data request memo will also include any relevant data needed to complete the Suggested Route Maps (Task 4). The results of the analysis will be included in the technical memo for each school (Task 2.2).

Task 2.2: School Walking and Rolling Audit
Having led numerous School Walking and Rolling Audits, Alta will use our standardized school audit procedures that we have refined through years of conducting audits to observe and assess existing conditions, interact with the community, and develop impactful infrastructure recommendations. Each audit will provide an opportunity for stakeholders to observe behavior and circulation, assess infrastructure, and discuss barriers and opportunities for improving safety. Reviewing conditions in person with stakeholders who know the area well will provide the best context for the Alta team to develop recommendations.

The expected outcomes of each walk audit are to:
• Identify preferred active transportation (walking, bicycling, scooting, and rolling) streets • Identify and prioritize barriers to active transportation • Develop a list of recommended infrastructure improvements on campus and in the public right -of-way • Develop a list of program improvements
• Identify key responsible parties for implementation of recommendations Alta will host one (1) in-person audit for each of the two locations. School community representatives will be invited to attend the audit. In addition to City and School District staff, Alta will work with the point of contact for each school to invite important school stakeholders (principal, facilities/transportation staff, teachers, etc.), safety patrol members (if applicable), about five (no more than ten) parents, and a few students (usually middle school grades or higher).

9.b
Packet Pg. 238
Attachment: Alta Letter Proposal Campbell SRTS Mapping Phase 2 (Authorization to Extend Agreement for Campbell Safe Routes to School 304 12th Street, Suite 2A
Oakland, CA 94607
(510) 540-5008 | altago.com
4 We have an effective process that respects stakeholders’ limited time to participate and maximizes the information we can gather during the short school commute peak observation period. The audits will begin with a short training session to review the process. This training will cover typical Safe Routes to School concepts and how to record input.

After the brief training, we will divide into small groups to observe pre-identified audit locations/corridors. We will provide participants with clipboards, pens, an Observation Tip Sheet, and an aerial map of the school zone. During the audit, participants will observe conditions and behaviors on school property, and along school walking/bicycling routes to identify deficiencies, safety hazards, and other barriers to walking and bicycling. We will also identify existing travel patterns around schools, including car and bus drop-off/pick-up zones and vehicle and bicycle parking areas. All audit materials will be made available in English and Spanish. Alta will coordinate with City and District staff to address Spanish language needs.

After the observation period, Alta will facilitate a discussion with participants to review their observations and discuss infrastructure and programmatic improvements that can address these challenges and/or take advantage of identified opportunities. Alta will provide a large-scale aerial map of the surrounding school area to mark up and will document the audit through photos, notes, and map markups.

After wrapping up the discussion around the audit, Alta will transition the conversation to a dedicated discussion about routes to school (Task 3.1a).

Upon the conclusion of the audit, Alta staff will examine and document the existing infrastructure conditions immediately around the school during a walkaround. City and District staff are encouraged to join Alta on the post- audit walkaround as we are limited with what we can observe during the audit itself. The audit will not review all locations within a half-mile radius of the school. Instead, the audit and walkaround will focus on known and potential school walking and rolling routes.

After completing the audit and other community engagement activities, Alta will summarize the existing conditions and community feedback into a brief Existing Conditions Technical Memo for each school. Alta will also create a conceptual Improvement Plan Map with infrastructure and programmatic recommendations for each campus. The memo and map will identify key barriers to walking and bicycling and include conceptual infrastructure recommendations for each campus and in the public right-of-way adjacent to the campus and on-campus recommendations for the school district to implement. These site-specific planning level conceptual designs can be used directly in grant applications to apply for infrastructure grant funds to design and construct the projects.

Alta will provide each jurisdiction/partner agency with the opportunity to provide one set of comments on the draft Technical Memo and Improvement Plan Map. Alta will then make revisions and send the draft Technical Memo and Improvement Plan Map to the school community for their review. Once recommendations are finalized, Alta will provide planning-level cost estimates for transportation-related on- and off-campus infrastructure recommendations.

Note: Audits and other observations will provide qualitative characterizations of many infrastructure conditions (perceived speeding, missing curb ramps, broken sidewalks, sign placement adjustments, etc.). These are not

9.b
Packet Pg. 239
Attachment: Alta Letter Proposal Campbell SRTS Mapping Phase 2 (Authorization to Extend Agreement for Campbell Safe Routes to School

304 12th Street, Suite 2A
Oakland, CA 94607
(510) 540-5008 | altago.com

5 intended to be replacements for formalized ADA accessibility studies, speed/ volume traffic studies, or other technical studies. Recommendations may include additional technical studies.

Task 2.3: Before and After Travel Surveys
Alta proposes a two-pronged approach for the before and after travel surveys. Firstly, Alta would create and help promote an interactive webmap where students, parents, and staff could draw their routes to campus (with the option to leave a comment with the route) and leave location-specific feedback on infrastructure or safety concerns. (The interactive webmap and paper-based alternative are described in more detail in Task 3.1.b). The second component will be a travel survey. In addition to understanding where families are walking, biking, rolling, and driving from, it is also very helpful to understand the attitudes of both students and parents about walking, biking, and rolling.

Alta will develop a short (under five minutes) survey asking parents and students about their travel choices to and from school, and about their attitudes towards walking, biking, and rolling. Survey questions will be developed in a manner that the same questions can be asked over time to track school travel mode shifts and changes in their attitudes towards certain modes. Alta proposes the “before” survey be incorporated into the webmap, allowing users to respond to both sets of prompts together. The results of the survey will be included in the Audit Technical Memo for each school.

School travel choices are usually based on a number of factors, including safety, comfort, time, distance, and preferences of the caregiver(s). Shifting behavior can both take time and require the impact of external forces (i.e., infrastructure changes, programmatic opportunities like a walking school bus, etc.). Further, changes to school routines are most likely to stick when implemented at the beginning of the school year or spring semester before new habits are formed. Alta suggests the first “After” survey be issued at least one semester (but preferably one year) after the implementation of new walking, biking, and rolling routes or encouragement programs. Depending on the final project schedule, Alta can create and upload the after survey to a survey platform like SurveyMonkey, or the City/District can upload the survey on their preferred platform at the appropriate time. The City and District would be responsible for all future survey uploads and analyses. Alta will provide a Word document with survey questions for ease of upload to a survey platform.

Task 2 Deliverables:
• Two (2) school walking and rolling audits (one per school) • Two (2) Technical Memos and Improvement Maps (one per school) • Two (2) post-audit school route discussions (one per school) • Planning-level cost estimates for infrastructure recommendations • “Before” survey (integrated with webmap in Task 3.1.b) • “After” survey questions
Task 3: Community and Stakeholder Engagement

9.b
Packet Pg. 240
Attachment: Alta Letter Proposal Campbell SRTS Mapping Phase 2 (Authorization to Extend Agreement for Campbell Safe Routes to School 304 12th Street, Suite 2A
Oakland, CA 94607
(510) 540-5008 | altago.com
6 In lieu of a formal, standalone meeting at each school, Alta proposes a multifaceted approach to conducting school staff, parent, and student engagement. Alta proposes using a combination of a school community attended walking and rolling audit (Task 2.2), interactive web tools (with paper-based alternatives for those with limited access or literacy with technology; Task 3.1.b), and school route-based engagement (post-audit school routes discussion Task

3.1a). We believe that this multifaceted approach will enable us to reach a larger and more diverse group of parents and students, providing them with non-time restrictive methods (engagement available beyond just a few hours during a meeting) to provide feedback about infrastructure and their travel routes to school.

We have seen through many of our other projects that allowing people to respond on their own time at their own pace has generated a higher volume and better quality of responses than just in-person meetings alone.

Task 3.1: School Official and Parent Engagement
Task 3.1.a: Post-Audit School Routes Discussion
After the audit-based discussion for each school is complete, Alta staff will transition the conversation to focus on school routes. The prior discussions about infrastructure and existing conditions will provide important context to this conversation. Alta staff will provide an overview of online engagement for that school collected to date and will lead a discussion about existing and new routes to campus for people walking, bicycling, and rolling.

Alta will have example walking and biking route maps for attendees to review and discuss map content and design options. Alta suggests the City/District determine some baseline design standards to limit the customizability for each school. This will create a uniform map style for the whole city.

Task 3.1.b: Project Micro-Website and Interactive Webmap To provide parents, students, and staff with opportunities to provide feedback at times convenient for them, Alta proposes creating a “micro-website” (a simple website with limited functionality) to host goals/ objectives, timeline, the “before” survey (Task 2.3), an interactive map, and other project information. Alta will work with the City and District to determine a domain name (i.e., CampbellSRTS.org) and other branding and design decisions.

The proposed interactive community input map will allow the public to draw the walking, rolling, and biking routes they use to get to school and leave a comment about that route. Map users can also identify intersections or other locations that they have feedback on, drop a pin, and leave a comment about that spot. Users can like, dislike, and comment on other community members’ routes and comments, furthering dialogue among the school community.

Comments and feedback can be signed or left anonymously (this and other webmap settings can be adjusted based on client request). This is a great option for school community members to leave feedback on infrastructure who cannot attend the audit. The website and interactive map will be available in English and Spanish.

As an alternative to the webmap, Alta could prepare a paper-based alternative for those with limited access to or limited proficiency with technology. The paper-based alternative will include the same survey questions posted on the website and an equivalent map-based route drawing activity. Alta will provide up to 15 paper copies per school.

9.b
Packet Pg. 241
Attachment: Alta Letter Proposal Campbell SRTS Mapping Phase 2 (Authorization to Extend Agreement for Campbell Safe Routes to School

304 12th Street, Suite 2A
Oakland, CA 94607
(510) 540-5008 | altago.com

7 Alta will collect the responses and add them to the data collected online. The paper-based activity will be available in English and Spanish.

Alta will prepare a flyer (to send home with students - printed or digitally) and newsletter text for each school promoting the engagement opportunities. Alta will coordinate with each school to distribute promotional materials.

Alta will review the feedback left on the map and use that information in the development of updated school walking, biking, and rolling routes and infrastructure recommendations.

Task 3.2: Interactive PDF Comment Tool for Route Map Review Alta will develop a public comment PDF webpage to gather community feedback on the draft suggested routes to school maps that can be linked to the City of Campbell website. The weblink will be shared with each school for distribution to the school community.

Alta will prepare final suggested routes to school maps to address comments received on the public drafts via the webpage.

Task 3.3: Summarize Findings
The Audit Technical Memos will include detailed findings of all community engagement efforts for each school (Task

2.3). Alta will prepare one Summary Memo (combined with Task 4.3) that will include a high-level overview, City- and Districtwide trends, and mini-summaries of each of the two schools. The Summary Memo will include information from the audits, surveys, interactive webmap, and route map-focused engagement.

Task 3 Deliverables:
• Post-audit school route discussion (one per school, two total) • Micro-website and interactive webmap
• Engagement promotional materials (flyers and newsletter text) • Interactive PDF Comment Tool
• One (1) Summary Memo
Task 4: Develop Safe Routes to School Maps
Task 4.1: Develop Route Maps
Based upon the results of Task 2 and Task 3, Alta will develop a Suggested Routes to School Map for each participating school (two total). The Suggested Routes to School Maps will show the preferred streets for walking, rolling and biking, which will help parents decide the best routes for their children to walk and roll to school.

Alta assumes the maps will be the same format and style as the previously completed route maps during Phase 1 of the contract.

The draft Suggested Routes to School Maps will be submitted electronically to the City, District, and partner agencies for review and comment. This task assumes one round of review; Alta will revise suggested routes based on one set of

9.b
Packet Pg. 242
Attachment: Alta Letter Proposal Campbell SRTS Mapping Phase 2 (Authorization to Extend Agreement for Campbell Safe Routes to School 304 12th Street, Suite 2A
Oakland, CA 94607
(510) 540-5008 | altago.com
8 comments. The public will also have an opportunity to provide input on the draft suggested routes through the interactive webmap (Task 3.1.b) and the Interactive PDF Comment Tool (Task 3.2). The information from the webmap will help develop the initial drafts. The PDF Comment Tool would review draft maps.

Alta will review and document all comments in a comment log. Alta will provide suggested changes, if appropriate, and will schedule a meeting with the City, District, and partner agencies to review the comments and suggested changes.

Final maps will be provided as individual PDF files, in combination with existing tip sheets/information captured on the opposite side of the existing map. The City, School District, and partner agencies will be responsible for printing hard copies as needed for distribution.

Optional Task 4.1.a: Route Map Spanish Translation
Alta can, upon request, translate the route maps and tips sheets into Spanish; further expanding the reach and impact of the maps. Map translation would occur after the City and all partners have agreed that the maps are final. Maps will be translated internally by Alta staff and will include an internal QA/QC review of the translations.

Task 4.2: Distribute Maps to School
Alta recommends the City establish simple metrics to keep track of map distribution. Metrics will include the number of hard copy maps distributed and, assuming the School District and schools help to promote the maps online, the number of online views and number of downloads. Alta suggests each school provide recurring reminders of the existence of the online maps, at least three times a semester and at events like Back To School Night.

Alta believes the most impactful way to measure the success of the route maps is by tracking shifts in student mode share. This will be accomplished by the proposed time series “After” surveys discussed in Task 2.3. The tracking of distribution metrics can be helpful in tracking which methods are preferred by families. Alta will discuss with the appropriate jurisdiction/partner for each school what digital and paper metrics they are capable of tracking.

If possible, Alta proposes the following metrics be tracked:
• Paper copies printed/distributed
• Online map views
• Online map PDF downloads
Alta will create a simple spreadsheet capable of tracking the metrics. We suggest creating a shareable spreadsheet (Google Spreadsheet, Excel file on OneDrive, etc. based on the City’s preference) that will allow each school or partner agency to track the appropriate metrics. The City and District will be responsible for sharing the tracking spreadsheet and sending periodic reminders to update the spreadsheet.

Task 4.3: Summary Memo

9.b
Packet Pg. 243
Attachment: Alta Letter Proposal Campbell SRTS Mapping Phase 2 (Authorization to Extend Agreement for Campbell Safe Routes to School

304 12th Street, Suite 2A
Oakland, CA 94607
(510) 540-5008 | altago.com

9 Alta will prepare a Summary Memo that will include a high-level overview of the route map creation process, brief route map engagement summary, and overview of the suggested route maps for both schools. This summary memo will be combined with Task 3.3 for one consolidated memo.

Task 4 Deliverables:
• Two (2) Draft Suggested Routes to School Maps (electronic format) • Final Suggested Routes to School Maps (electronic format) • Map Distribution Tracking Spreadsheet
• One (1) Summary Memo
• OPTIONAL: Two (2) Suggested Route Maps (electronic format) translated into Spanish Task 1-4 Schedule
• January 2024: Notice to Proceed
• February – April 2024: Walk Audits completed at both schools. • April 2024: Draft Suggested Routes to School Maps completed for both schools and sent to City of Campbell for feedback. Draft Technical Memos and Improvement Maps for each school completed and sent to City of Campbell for feedback.
• May 2024: City of Campbell to provide Alta with comments • May 2024: Alta to revise all materials based upon City comments and send to the school community for one round of comments
• July 2024: Final (2nd) Draft of Suggested Route Maps, Technical Memos, and Improvement Maps sent to City of Campbell
Task 1-4 Fee
Alta’s proposed fee shall not exceed $41,000, which includes the expenses. The proposed fee shall not exceed $42,000 including the optional task.

Fee Summary
Task 1. Project Management $5,550 Task 2. Data Collection and Analysis $12,370 Task 3. Community and Stakeholder Engagement $13,810
Task 4. Develop Safe Routes to School Maps $8,270
Sub Total $40,000
Expenses $1,000 Total $41,000
Optional Task $1,000

9.b
Packet Pg. 244
Attachment: Alta Letter Proposal Campbell SRTS Mapping Phase 2 (Authorization to Extend Agreement for Campbell Safe Routes to School City
Council
Report
TITLE: Authorization to Execute Funding Agreement and Approve Budget Adjustment for the Hamilton Avenue/Highway 17 Bicycle
Overcrossing Planning Study (Resolution/Roll Call Vote)

RECOMMENDED ACTION
That the City Council adopt a resolution 1) approving a funding agreement and authorizing the City Manager to execute said agreement with the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority for the Hamilton Avenue/Highway 17 Bicycle Overcrossing Planning Study and 2) authorizing the Finance Director to execute a budget adjustment to provide funding for the project.

BACKGROUND
On February 7, 2023, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 12935 authorizing the Public Works Director to submit a 2016 Measure B Bicycle & Pedestrian Planning Studies Competitive Grant Program Grant Application for the Hamilton Avenue/Highway 17 Bicycle Overcrossing Planning Study. This resolution authorized the use of $108,000 in American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) Funds to serve as the local match; approved the budget adjustment allocating $108,000 in ARPA Funds to this project and related transfers should the project be awarded the 2016 Measure B Bicycle & Pedestrian Planning Studies Competitive Grant Program Funds.

On June 1, 2023, the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) Board voted to 1) approve the recommended project list for the 2016 Measure B Bicycle & Pedestrian Planning Studies Competitive Grant Program FY2022 to FY2023 call for projects; and 2) authorize the VTA General Manager to execute the necessary agreements for the 2016 Measure B Bicycle & Pedestrian Planning Studies Competitive Grant Program Funds. The recommended project list included the Hamilton Avenue/Highway 17 Bicycle Overcrossing Planning Study.

DISCUSSION
Hamilton Avenue/Highway 17 Bicycle Overcrossing Planning Study The Hamilton Avenue/Highway 17 Bicycle Overcrossing Planning Study would evaluate how best to improve bicycle and pedestrian mobility across State Route 17 near the existing Hamilton Avenue Bridge. The goal of the study would be to develop feasible Item: 10
Category: CONSENT CALENDAR
Meeting Date: January 22, 2024
10 Packet Pg. 245
Hamilton Avenue/Highway 17 Bicycle Overcrossing Planning Study Page 2 of 3 alternatives, assess the impacts of each alternative, and determine a preferred alternative to carry forward to final design.

The project would study existing bicycle and pedestrian facilities along Hamilton Avenue, bicycle and pedestrian travel patterns, surrounding context and planning efforts, alternative alignments, impacts to utilities and right -of-way, environmental impacts, structural and geotechnical constraints, recommended preferred alignment, and preliminary project cost estimates.

The study would engage the City Council , Campbell Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee, Caltrans, VTA, Campbell residents, and other stakeholders.

The preferred alignment and preliminary cost estimates developed by this study would provide input (e.g., location and cost of the preferred alternative) for the Hamilton Avenue Precise Plan.

Funding Agreement

The Draft Funding Agreement (Attachment B) provides a project description and outlines the terms of the agreement including the project cost, each party’s financial contribution to the cost of the project, reimbursement, eligible use of funds, invoicing, and each party’s responsibilities. Execution of the funding agreement is required before the City can proceed with the project.

FISCAL IMPACT

The Hamilton Avenue/Highway 17 Bicycle Overcrossing Planning Study is estimated to cost $3 80,000. Since the grant award was $266,000, a local match of $114,000 is required. This amount is slightly higher than the amount that the City Council approved on February 7, 2023. A budget adjustment would be required to allocate $114,000 in ARPA funds and approve related transfers.

To use ARPA Funds, contracts with vendors using the funds must be fully executed by December 31, 2024, and the funds must be fully spent by December 31, 2026. The tentative project schedule would be as follows.

February 2024 Execute funding agreement
March-May 2024 Prepare Request for Proposals (RFP)
June 2024 Council authorization to issue RFP
July-September 2024 Issue RFP
October-November 2024 Negotiate consultant agreement
December 2024 Execute agreement
January-December 2025 Prepare planning study.

10 Packet Pg. 246
Hamilton Avenue/Highway 17 Bicycle Overcrossing Planning Study Page 3 of 3

ALTERNATIVES

1. Do not execute funding agreement for the project. This alternative is not recommended since the project is currently unfunded. If successful, the City would pay only the local match for the project. In return, the project would be fully funded.

2. Do not approve the use of ARPA funds. Direct staff to use other funds for the local match. This alternative is not recommended since the ARPA funds are available and will expire by December 31, 2026, if not used. The project should be completed by this deadline.

Prepared by:

Matthew Jue, Traffic Engineer
Reviewed by:

Todd Capurso, Director of Public Works
Approved by:

Brian Loventhal, City Manager
Attachment:
a. Resolution
b. Draft Funding Agreement
c. Budget Adjustment
10 Packet Pg. 247
RESOLUTION NO. ___________

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CAMPBELL

APPROVING A FUNDING AGREEMENT FOR THE HAMILTON AVENUE/HIGHWAY 17 BICYCLE OVERCROSSING STUDY AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER

TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT

WHEREAS, on February 7, 2023, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 12935 authorizing the Public Works Director to submit a 2016 Measure B Bicycle & Pedestrian Planning Studies Competitive Grant Program Grant Application for the Hamilton Avenue/Highway 17 Bicycle Overcrossing Planning Study; and

WHEREAS, o n June 1, 2023, the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) Board voted to 1) approve the recommended project list for the 2016 Measure B Bicycle & Pedestrian Planning Studies Competitive Grant Program FY2022 to FY2023 call for projects; and 2) authorize the VTA General Manager to execute the necessary agreements for the 2016 Measure B Bicycle & Pedestrian Planning Studies Competitive Grant Program funds; and

WHEREAS, the recommended project list included the Hamilton Avenue/Highway 17 Bicycle Overcrossing Planning Study; and

WHEREAS, the Hamilton Avenue/Highway 17 Bicycle Overcrossing Planning Study would evaluate how best to improve bicycle and pedestrian mobility across State Route 17 near the existing Hamilton Avenue Bridge; and

WHEREAS, the goal of the study would be to develop feasible alternatives, assess the impacts of each alternative, and determine a preferred alternative to carry forward to final design; and

WHEREAS, the project is estimated to cost $380,000; and

WHEREAS, the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) awarded $266,000 in 2016 Measure B Bicycle & Pedestrian Planning Studies Competitive Grant Program Grant Funds to the Hamilton Avenue/Highway 17 Bicycle Overcrossing Planning Study ; and

WHEREAS, the draft funding agreement provides a project description and outlines the terms of the agreement including the project cost, each party’s financial contribution to the cost of the project, reimbursement, eligible use of funds, invoicing, and each party’s responsibilities; and

WHEREAS, execution of the funding agreement is required before the City can proceed with the project; and

WHEREAS, $114,000 in American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) Funds are required to serve as the local match.

10.a
Packet Pg. 248
Attachment: Resolution (Hamilton Avenue/Highway 17 Bicycle Overcrossing Planning Study) WHEREAS, to use ARPA Funds, contracts with vendors using the funds must be fully executed by December 31, 2024 , and the funds must be fully spent by December 31, 2026; and
WHEREAS, the project would tentatively be completed by December 2025.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Campbell that the City Council approves the funding agreement and authorizes the City Manager to execute the funding agreement for the Hamilton Avenue /Highway 17 Bicycle Overcrossing Planning Study; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council authorizes the use of $1 14,000 in ARPA funds to serve as the local match; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council approves the budget adjustment allocating $ 114,000 in ARPA Funds to the Hamilton Avenue/Highway 17 Bicycle Overcrossing Planning Study and related transfers.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 22nd day of January, 2024, by the following roll call vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

APPROVED:
___________________________________
Susan M. Landry, Mayor
ATTEST:
___________________________
Andrea Sanders, City Clerk

10.a
Packet Pg. 249
Attachment: Resolution (Hamilton Avenue/Highway 17 Bicycle Overcrossing Planning Study)

Rev. 12/13/2023 Page 1 of 19

FUNDING AGREEMENT

BETWEEN

CITY OF CAMPBELL
AND

SANTA CLARA VALLEY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
FOR
HAMILTON AVENUE/HIGHWAY 17 BICYCLE OVERCROSSING PLANNING STUDY

THIS agreement (“Agreement”) is between the C ity of Campbell (“City”) and Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (“VTA”) and is entered into as of the last date of signature below (“Effective Date”). City and VTA may be individually referred to as a “Party” or collectively referred to as the “Parties.”

I. RECITALS

A. Whereas, on June 24, 2016, the VTA Board of Directors adopted a resolution to place a ballot measure before Santa Clara County voters in November 2016 to authorize a one -half of one percent retail transaction and use tax for 30 years for nine transportation -related program categories (“2016 Measure B”);

B. Whereas, on November 8, 2016, Santa Clara County voters enacted 2016 Measure B;

C. Whereas, on October 5, 2017, the VTA Board of Directors (i) established the 2016 Measure B Program (“Program”), which includes a Bicycle and Pedestrian program category to fund bicycle and pedestrian projects and educational programs (“Bike/Ped Category”) and (ii) adopted the 2016 Measure B Bicycle & Pedestrian Program Guidelines (“Bike/Ped Guidelines”), attached as Exhibit A; and

D. Whereas, VTA and C ity desire to specify the terms and conditions under which VTA will administer Bike/Ped Category funds to City per the Bike/Ped Guidelines.

NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the Parties agree as follows:

II. AGREEMENT

A. Project Description.

The Project (“Project”) is to develop a planning study that will evaluate how best to improve bicycle and pedestrian mobility on Hamilton Avenue over State Route 17. The Project will develop feasible alternatives, assess the impacts of each alternative, and determine a preferred alternative to carry forward to final design . The project would study existing bicycle and pedestrian facilities along Hamilton Avenue, bicycle and pedestrian travel patterns, surrounding context and planning e fforts alternative alignments, impacts to utilities and right -of-way, environmental impacts, structural and geotechnical constraints, recommended preferred alignment, and preliminary project cost estimates.

10.b
Packet Pg. 250
Attachment: Draft Funding Agreement (Hamilton Avenue/Highway 17 Bicycle Overcrossing Planning Study) R
ev. 12/13/2023 Page 2 of 19
Deliverables include the preferred alignment and preliminary cost estimates. The Project location is Hamilton Avenue between Highway 17 Southbound Off-ramp/Salmar Avenue and Creekside Way.

B
. Term of Agreement.

Th
e term of this Agreement will commence on the Effective Date and continue through the earlier of:
(i
) December 31, 2025, (ii) completion of the Project, (iii) cancellation of the Project, or (iv) termination of this Agreement pursuant to these terms and conditions.

C
. Cost of Project.

T
otal Project Cost. The total cumulative dollar amount actually incurred and expended toward the Project by all Parties involved, as measured at the completion or termination of the Project (“Total Project Cost”) is expected to be $380,000 (“Budgeted Project Cost”).

D. F
inancial Contribution to Cost of Project.

1. VT
A’s Financial Contribution to the Project . VTA will contribute Bike/Ped Category funds in a n a
mount not to exceed $266,000 (70% of Budgeted Project Cost) for City to use for completion of th
e Project. All funds will be available on a reimbursement basis for Eligible Costs (as defined in Paragraph F.1 below), pursuant to this Agreement.

2. C
ity’s Financial Contribution to the Project. City is solely responsible for (i) all funds it has expended toward the Project prior to the Effective Date; and (ii) all funds required to complete the Project above VTA’s Financial Contribution to the Project. In all circumstances, City must contribute a minimum of 30% of the Total Project Cost.

3. P
roject Savings. If the Project is delivered under the Budgeted Project Cost, VTA’s Financ ial C
ontribution to the Project will be reduced to an amount that is 70% of the Total Project Cost.

E. R
eimbursement.

1. V
TA will reimburse City in the amount of: (i) Eligible Costs, as defined in Paragraph F.1., submitted to VTA; or (ii) VTA’s Financial Contribution to the Project, whichever is less. VTA will reimburse City based on receipt of invoices showing Eligible Costs incurred and paid for by City. VTA will not reimburse City for any costs that are not Eligible Costs.

2. I
f this A greement is terminated, as set forth in Paragraph Q , VTA will not be responsible for reimbursing any costs or expenses City incurs after the effective date of termination.

10.b
Packet Pg. 251
Attachment: Draft Funding Agreement (Hamilton Avenue/Highway 17 Bicycle Overcrossing Planning Study)

Rev. 12/13/2023 Page 3 of 19

F. Eligible Use of Funds.

1. Eligible Costs. VTA will only reimburse City for actual costs directly related to performance of the Project. For purposes of this Agreement, “Eligible Costs” are as described below. No other expenses will be subject to reimbursement as Eligible Costs without the prior written approval of VTA.

a. Direct Labor Costs.

b. Travel Expenses. Travel expenses (as described below), which must be authorized by VTA in writing prior to C ity, consultants, and /or contractors incurring them . VTA may deny reimbursement of any travel expense incurred by City, consultants, and/or contractors prior to VTA’s written approval. If VTA approves travel, VTA will reimburse the following types of travel expenses related to performance of the Project at the following per-diem or lump sum rates:

i. Car Rental: $50/day (including all gas and all associated fees);

ii. Flight: The rates set forth as GSA City Pairs Gov’t “YCA” Fare (https://cpsearch.fas.gsa.gov/cpsearch/search.do);

iii. Food/Beverage and Hotel: The rates set forth as GSA per diem rates (https://www.gsa.gov/travel/plan-book/per-diem-rates); and

iv. Mileage: The rates set forth as GSA mileage allowance (see https://www.gsa.gov/travel/plan-book/transportation-airfare-pov- etc/privatelyowned-vehicle-pov-mileage-reimbursement-rates).

c. Other Direct Costs. VTA will reimburse parking, tolls, deliveries, printing, plan reproduction, blueprint services, any fees required for background checks from iproveit.com, and any other expenses directly associated with the Project at actual cost without markup. City must provide appropriate supporting documentation, including detailed receipts. If any of the other direct costs described in this paragraph will exceed $500.00, C ity must receive VTA’s written approval prior to incurring such expense. VTA may deny reimbursement of any such other direct cost expense incurred by City, prior to VTA’s written approval.

2. Ineligible Costs. Specific “Ineligible Costs” include, but are not limited to, the following:

a. Expenses for organizational functions, businesses services, and information technology including, but not limited to telephone charges, computer costs, CAD machine charges, in - house copying charges, and facsimile charges will not be reimbursed as other direct costs;

10.b
Packet Pg. 252
Attachment: Draft Funding Agreement (Hamilton Avenue/Highway 17 Bicycle Overcrossing Planning Study) R
ev. 12/13/2023 Page 4 of 19
b. Rent and utilities;
c
. Food or beverages (e.g. as part of meetings, workshops, training, or events); and d. Alc
ohol, travel upgrades, fines, memberships, loss of personal property or cash, “no shows,” or personal itinerary changes.

3. S
hould the eligibility of a cost be questioned, VTA will determine, in writing, the eligibility of a cost before the cost is incurred. In its performance under this Agreement, all Parties will strictly comply with all VTA 2016 Measure B Program requirements set forth in the Bike/Ped Guidelines.

G. In
voicing to VTA.

1. C
ity must submit invoices to [email protected] for reimbursement of work completed on the Project. Each invoice must include all records, including staff hours, contractors’ invoices, miscellaneous invoices, force account charges, and any other documentation requested by VTA as substantiation for invoices submitted for reimbursement. Invoices may not be submitted more frequently than monthly and must be submitted within one year of City incurring the cost(s).

2. A
ll invoices must detail:
a
. Eligible Costs actually incurred and paid by City;
b. Total reimbursement amount (in dollars) requested;
c. Total amount reimbursed by VTA to date; and
d. Project tasks or milestones completed for which C ity incurred E ligible Costs during the relevant billing cycle.

3. V
TA will remit the amount due to C ity within 30 calendar days of receipt of a complete, fully documented invoice.

H
. Return of Funds.

I
f VTA learns that previously reimbursed costs were not Eligible Costs, City must return such funds no later than 15 business days from receipt of notice from VTA.

I. Cit
y’s Responsibilities.

1. I
mplementing Agency Tasks. City will be the sponsor and implementing agency for the Project. In its role as sponsor and implementing agency under this A greement, C ity must perform the following tasks:
a
. Procuring professional services for the P roject including, but not limited to , the following activities: advertising the work via a public solicitation, opening bids in response to the public

10.b
Packet Pg. 253
Attachment: Draft Funding Agreement (Hamilton Avenue/Highway 17 Bicycle Overcrossing Planning Study)

Rev. 12/13/2023 Page 5 of 19

solicitation, awarding a contract, approving contract documents, and administering the awarded contract in accordance with all applicable laws, regulations, and codes including, but not limited to, the California Public Contract Code and the California Labor Code;

b. Obtaining all necessary permits for performance of the Project, as applicable;

c. Performing community engagement activities for the Project, as applicable;

d. Make staff available to present on the Project at VTA committees as needed; and

e. Conducting standard close -out activities for the P roject including, but not limited to , performing final accounting review and reviewing all contractual requirements.

2. Other Project Management Duties. City must also perform the following duties:

a. Complete and submit to VTA the most current version of VTA’s 2016 Measure B Complete Streets Checklist (“Complete Streets Checklist”) for P roject within five business days of the Effective Date;

b. Complete and submit to VTA a project management plan (“PMP”) for Project within 30 business days of the Effective Date; the PMP must be in writing and must include information regarding staffing plan, cost, schedule, contracting plan, and risk assessment;

c. Actively monitor actual P roject expenditures to ensure that the 2016 M easure B funds are used to reimburse Eligible Costs only;

d. Provide VTA with written quarterly progress updates on the Project including, but not limited to, updates on P roject expenditures, any changes in scope and schedule, community engagement outcome, and Project status in a format previously provided to City;

e. Provide VTA copies of P roject deliverables including, but not limited to, reports, designs, drawings, plans, specifications, schedules, and other materials; and

f. Submit the P roject’s final report to VTA, which must be in writing and must include information regarding final Project costs and study results, along with any other information VTA may require (“Final Report”).

J. VTA’s Responsibilities.

1. VTA will perform and/or be responsible for the following tasks to perform oversight for Project:

a. Provide Comple Streets Checklist form to City and r eview competed checklist for Project to ensure Complete Streets compliance; and

10.b
Packet Pg. 254
Attachment: Draft Funding Agreement (Hamilton Avenue/Highway 17 Bicycle Overcrossing Planning Study) R
ev. 12/13/2023 Page 6 of 19
b. Pr
ovide PMP form to City and review completed PMP for Project to provide oversight of the delivery of Project and to ensure Project complies with the Bike/Ped Guidelines.

2. P
ay the amount due to C ity within 30 calendar days of receipt of a complete, fully -documented invoice for Eligible Costs.

K
. Indemnification.

N
either VTA nor any of its officers or employees will be responsible for any damage or liability arising out of or relating to City ’s acts or omissions under or in connection with any work, authority, or jurisdiction associated with this A greement. Pursuant to California Government Code §895.4, C ity must fully defend, indemnify, and save harmless VTA from all suits or actions of every name, kind, and description arising from an injury (as defined by California Government Code §810.8) relating to City’s ac
ts or omissions under o r in connection with any work, authority, or jurisdiction delegated to C ity under this Agreement. This provision will survive the termination or expiration of this Agreement.

L. I
nsurance.

A
t all times during this A greement, C ity must comply with the insurance requirements and specifications of the attached Exhibit B, Insurance Requirements. City may, in its discretion, elect to self-insure, but any such self-insurance must meet the requirements and specifications in Exhibit B.

M. A
dditional Insured and Indemnity Provision.

I
n any agreement executed between the City and a third party for purposes related in any way to the subject matter of this Agreement (“Third Party Contract”), City must require that VTA be named as (i) an additional insured on a primary and non-contributory basis with separation of insureds and waiver o
f subrogation on all policies of insurance, except when not applicable and (ii) an indemnified party in any indemnity provision contained in the Third Party Contract. Third Party Contracts must contain insurance requirements with coverages at least as broad as, and limits at least as great as, the requirements of Exhibit B.

N. P
ublic Works.

If
City awards a contract to a third party for the performance of a public work, as defined in California Labor Code Sections 1720 through 1720.6 (“Public Works Contract”) , in connection with this Agreement, City must comply, and must require such third party to comply, with the requirements of California Labor Code Sections 1720 et seq. If the Public Works Contract is funded in whole or in part with federal funds, City must also comply, and must require such third party to also comply, with the requirements of the Davis Bacon Act (40 U.S.C. Sections 3141-3144 and 3146-3148).

10.b
Packet Pg. 255
Attachment: Draft Funding Agreement (Hamilton Avenue/Highway 17 Bicycle Overcrossing Planning Study)

Rev. 12/13/2023 Page 7 of 19

O. Compliance with Applicable Law.

In the execution of the Project and performance of its responsibilities under this Agreement, City must comply with all applicable requirements of local, state, and federal laws.

P. Compliance with 2016 Measure B Requirements.

In its performance under this Agreement, City must comply with, and must ensure Project compliance with, all 2016 Measure B requirements set forth in the Bike/Ped Guidelines.

Q. Termination

1. Either Party may at any time terminate this Agreement by giving 10 business days written notice of such termination to the other Party. Notice must identify the effective date of such cancellation and must be provided in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement.

2. In the event of termination under this section, City must submit its final invoice to VTA within 30 calendar days of the effective date of termination, and such invoice will be solely for Eligible Costs City incurred prior to termination.

R. Audit and Records.

1. City must maintain, and must require their contractors to maintain, in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and practices, complete books, accounts, records , and data pertaining to services performed under this A greement, including the costs of contract administration. Such documentation must be supported by properly executed payrolls, invoices, contracts, and vouchers evidencing in detail the nature and propriety of any charges and must be sufficient to allow a proper audit of services . All checks, payrolls, invoices, contracts , and other accounting documents pertaining in whole or in part to the services must be clearly identified and readily accessible.

2. For the duration of the Agreement, and for a period of five years after final payment, each Party and its representatives must have access during normal business hours to any books, accounts, records, data, and other relevant documents (“Records”) of the other Party that are pertinent to this Agreement for audits, examinations, excerpts, and transactions. The other Party must furnish copies of the Records upon request.

S. Notices / Authorized Representatives.

1. Notices must be in writing and addressed to the other Party’s Authorized Representative (“Recipient”) and will be deemed delivered or received on the date personally delivered to the Recipient or when deposited by registered or certified mail with postage and charges prepaid.

10.b
Packet Pg. 256
Attachment: Draft Funding Agreement (Hamilton Avenue/Highway 17 Bicycle Overcrossing Planning Study) R
ev. 12/13/2023 Page 8 of 19

2. T
he Parties Authorized Representatives are as follows:

VT
A:

Marcella Rensi
Deputy Director, Grants & Allocations
Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority
3331 N First Street
San Jose, CA 95134
Email: [email protected]
CITY:

Brian Loventhal
City Manager
City of Campbell
70 North First Street
Campbell, CA 95008
Email: [email protected]

3. W
ritten notification to the other Party must be provided, in advance, for changes in the name or address of an Authorized Representative stated above.

T. G
eneral Terms and Conditions.

1. H
eadings. The subject headings of the articles and paragraphs in this Agreement are included for convenience only and will not affect the construction or interpretation of any of its provisions.

2. I
ncorporation of Exhibits and Attachments. All exhibits and attachments referenced in this Contract are incorporated into it by this reference.

3. C
onstruction and Interpretation of Agreement. This A greement, and each of its provisions, terms, and conditions, has been reached as a result of negotiations between the P arties.

A
ccordingly, each P arty expressly acknowledges and agrees that (i) this A greement will not be deemed to have been authored, prepared, or drafted by any particular P arty and (ii) the rule of construction to the effect that ambiguities are to be resolved against the drafting party will not be employed in the interpretation of this Agreement or in the resolution of disputes.

4. A
mendment. Except as expressly provided in this Agreement, its provisions cannot be altered, modified, or amended except through the execution of a written amendment executed by the Parties.

10.b
Packet Pg. 257
Attachment: Draft Funding Agreement (Hamilton Avenue/Highway 17 Bicycle Overcrossing Planning Study)

Rev. 12/13/2023 Page 9 of 19

5. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the Parties relating to the subject matter and supersedes all prior negotiations, contracts, agreements, or understandings, whether oral or written, of the Parties regarding the subject matter.

6. No Waiver. The failure of either Party to insist upon the strict performance of any of the terms, covenants, or conditions of this Agreement will not be deemed a waiver of (i) any right or remedy that either P arty may have or (ii) either Party’s right to require strict performance of all of the terms, covenants, and conditions of this Agreement.

7. Dispute Resolution.

a. If a question or allegation arises regarding (i) interpretation of this A greement or its performance, or (ii) the alleged failure of a Party to perform, the Party raising the question or making the allegation must give written notice thereof to the other P arty. The Parties must promptly meet in an effort to resolve the issues raised. If the Parties fail to resolve the issues raised, alternative forms of dispute resolution, including mediation, may be pursued by mutual agreement. It is the intent of the P arties to the greatest extent possible to avoid litigation as a method of dispute resolution.

b. Notwithstanding the foregoing, nothing in this Paragraph T will be deemed to prevent a Party from filing suit or an administrative action to preserve its right to assert a claim within any applicable statute of limitations. To the extent practicable, the Parties will negotiate in good faith to create a tolling agreement to toll such statute(s) of limitations to allow for the Parties to engage in dispute resolution provisions of this Agreement prior to filing of such actions.

8. Severability. If any provisions of this Agreement (or portions or applications of it) are held to be unenforceable or invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction, (a) the Parties will negotiate in good faith to make an equitable adjustment to the Agreement provisions with a view toward effecting the Agreement’s purpose, and (b) the remaining provisions (or portions or applications of them) will remain valid and enforceable.

9. Governing Law. The laws of the State of California will govern this Agreement and any claim that might arise between City and VTA without regard to conflict of law provisions.

10. Venue. Any lawsuit or legal action arising from this A greement must be commenced and prosecuted in the courts of Santa Clara County, California. C ity agrees to submit to the personal jurisdiction of the courts located in Santa Clara County, California for the purpose of litigating all such claims.

11. Ownership of Work. All reports, designs, drawings, plans, specifications, schedules, studies, memoranda, and other documents assembled or prepared, in the process of being assembled or prepared, or furnished to either Party under this Agreement are the joint property of all Parties.

10.b
Packet Pg. 258
Attachment: Draft Funding Agreement (Hamilton Avenue/Highway 17 Bicycle Overcrossing Planning Study) R
ev. 12/13/2023 Page 10 of 19
Each Party is entitled to copies and access to these materials during the progress of the P roject and upon completion of the Project or termination of this A greement. All P arties may retain a copy of all material produced under this Agreement for use in their general activities. 1 2. Attribution to VTA. City must include attribution to VTA that indicates part of the work was funded by 2016 Measure B Funds. This provision applies to any project or publication that was funded in whole or in part by 2016 Measure B f unds. Acceptable forms of attribution include 2016 Measure B’s branding on Project-related documents, construction signs, public information materials, and any other applicable documents. VTA will provide 2016 Measure B branding to City for this purpose.
1 3. Non-discrimination. The Parties and any contractors performing services on behalf of the Parties (“Contractors”) will not unlawfully discriminate or permit discrimination, harass, or allow harassment against any person or group of persons because of race, color, religious creed, national origin, ancestry, age (over 40), sex, gender, gender identity, gender expression, sexual orientation, marital status, pregnancy, childbirth or related conditions, medical condition (including cancer), mental disability, physical disability (including HI V and AIDS), genetic information, or military and veteran’s status, or in any manner prohibited by federal, state, or local laws. In addition, the P arties and Contractors must not unlawfully deny any of their employees family care leave or discriminate against such employees on the basis of having to use family care leave. The Parties and Contractors must ensure that the evaluation and treatment of their employees and applicants for employment is free of such discrimination and harassment. 1 4. Relationship of the P arties. It is understood that this is an A greement by and between independent parties and does not create the relationship of agent, servant, employee, partnership, joint venture or association, or any other relationship other than that of independent contractor.
1 5. Counterparts; Electronic Signature s. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which will be deemed an original but all of which will constitute one and the same instrument. Unless otherwise prohibited by law, VTA policy, or City ordinance or policy, the Parties agree that an electronic copy of a signed contract, or an electronically signed contract, has the same force and legal effect as a contract executed with an original ink signature.

The term “electronic copy of a signed contract” refers to a writing as set forth in Evidence Code Section 1550. The term “electronically signed contract” means a contract that is executed by applying an electronic signature using technology approved by each of the Parties. 1 6. Authority to Execute Agreement. Each Party to this A greement represents and warrants that each person whose signature appears below is authorized and has the full authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the entity that is a Party to this Agreement.

S
ignatures on following page

10.b
Packet Pg. 259
Attachment: Draft Funding Agreement (Hamilton Avenue/Highway 17 Bicycle Overcrossing Planning Study)

Rev. 12/13/2023 Page 11 of 19

The Parties have caused their undersigned, duly authorized signatories to execute this Agreement on the dates set forth below.

Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority City of Campbell

Carolyn M. Gonot
General Manager/CEO
Brian Loventhal
City Manager

Date Date
Approved as to Form: Approved as to Form:

Tamara Costa
Senior Assistant Counsel
William Seligmann
City Attorney
Date Date

10.b
Packet Pg. 260
Attachment: Draft Funding Agreement (Hamilton Avenue/Highway 17 Bicycle Overcrossing Planning Study) R
ev. 12/13/2023 Page 12 of 19

EXHIBIT A
2016 Measure B Bicycle & Pedestrian Program Guidelines
[Revised and approved by VTA Board of Directors: August 4, 2022] To fund bicycle and pedestrian projects of countywide significance identified by the cities, County and VTA. The program will give priority to those projects that connect to schools, transit and employment centers; fill gaps in the existing bike and pedestrian network; safely cross barriers to mobility; and make walking or biking a safer and more convenient means of transportation for all county residents and visitors. Bicycle and pedestrian educational programs such as Safe Routes to Schools, will be eligible for funding.

Total Funding

3.97% of Program Tax Revenues
Program Type
Formula-based program
Distribution o f Funds
• Funds will be allocated on a two-year cycle, in conjunction with the VTA Biennial Budget process.
• Funds are allocated on an annual basis, based on the application of the ballot-established ratio to the estimated Program Tax Revenue. The allocations are calculated in two steps:

1. Multiplying the ballot-established ratio by the projected Program Tax Revenues for that fiscal year.

2. Reconciling prior allocations, which were based on estimated Program Tax Revenues, with actual Program Tax Revenues (referred to as a “true-up process”). This true-up process will occur in the first fiscal year of each biennial budget cycle. • The program will consist of three sub-categories: Education & Encouragement Programs, Planning Studies, and Capital Projects.
• A minimum of 80% of available program category funds will be allocated to Capital Projects.
• A maximum of 15% of available program category funds will be set aside for Education & Encouragement. The funds will be allocated as follows:

1. 25% for countywide (including targeting unincorporated areas) education & encouragement programs

2. Remaining funds allocated by city population formula with a $10,000 annual minimum allocation per city
• A maximum of 5% of available program category funds will be allocated to Planning Studies.
• If the Planning Studies o
r Capital Projects competitive gra nt cycle is not fully awarded, the balance of funds from that cycle will roll into its next call for projects cycle.

10.b
Packet Pg. 261
Attachment: Draft Funding Agreement (Hamilton Avenue/Highway 17 Bicycle Overcrossing Planning Study)

Rev. 12/13/2023 Page 13 of 19

Implementation
• Only projects currently listed on Attachment A of 2016 Measure B are eligible.

• Education & Encouragement (Formula Distribution)
• VTA and individual agencies will enter into a Master Agreement for Education & Encouragement funds.
• The 2016 Measure B Program Office will notify agency of allocation for two- year cycle.
• Funds will be distributed on a reimbursable basis.
• Agency will submit annual education & encouragement work program and annual progress report.
• Education & Encouragement funds may be banked for a maximum of three years with explanation of banking purposes upon approval by the 2016 Measure B Program Office.
• The 2016 Measure B Program Office will conduct an assessment regarding the effectiveness of the program.

• Capital Projects & Planning Studies (Competitive Grants) • Only a public agency can serve as a project sponsor. Other entities must partner with a public agency to apply for a grant.
• The grant program contains two categories:
o Capital projects
 Activities leading to/including:
• Environmental Clearance
• Design
• Right of Way
• Construction
 Construction grant requests must include cost estimates supported by 30% to 35% design.
o Planning studies
 Includes planning studies to support capital project development for those projects currently listed on Attachment A of 2016 Measure B. It does not include general/master planning efforts.
• The minimum grant awar d is $50,000.
• The maximum grant award per sponsoring agency can be no more than 50% of the total available funds per call for projects per cycle, unless the cycle is undersubscribed.

The 2016 Measure B Program Office developed project criteria in conjunction with the VTA Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) Capital Improvement Program Working Group and incorporated input from the TAC and Bicycle & Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC).

10.b
Packet Pg. 262
Attachment: Draft Funding Agreement (Hamilton Avenue/Highway 17 Bicycle Overcrossing Planning Study)

Rev. 12/13/2023 Page 14 of 19

• Scoring committees for the grant programs will be comprised of three BPAC members, three Member Agency staff, and one VTA staff person. If enough BPAC or Member Agency staff are not available as described above, Board -adopted scoring committee policy will be followed.

Criteria
• Capital Projects and Planning Studies will be scored on criteria that supports the language in 2016 Measure B, including but not limited to:
o Countywide significance
o Connection to/serves schools, transit, or employment centers o Fills gaps in bicycle/pedestrian network
o Provides safer crossings of barriers
o Makes walking or biking safer
o Makes walking or biking more convenient
o Other criteria to consider:
 Safety benefits
 Increase in bicycle and pedestrian usage
 Community support
 Project readiness
 Projects s erve Equity Priority Communities or vulnerable populations with specific needs
 Non-2016 Measure B contribution
Requirements
• Competitive grant projects require a minimum 10% non-2016 Measure B contribution. • Reporting requirements will be detailed in agreements executed with VTA for project funding.
• VTA Complete Streets reporting requirements are required for Planning Studies and Capital Projects.
• All projects must comply with 2016 Measure B program oversight requirements. • All collateral material must comply with 2016 Measure B branding requirements .

10.b
Packet Pg. 263
Attachment: Draft Funding Agreement (Hamilton Avenue/Highway 17 Bicycle Overcrossing Planning Study)

Rev. 12/13/2023 Page 15 of 19

EXHIBIT B

INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS

CITY’S ATTENTION IS DIRECTED TO THE INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS BELOW. IT IS HIGHLY

RECOMMENDED THAT CITY CONFER WITH THEIR INSURANCE CARRIERS OR BROKERS TO DETERMINE THE AVAILABILITY OF INSURANCE CERTIFICATES AND ENDORSEMENTS REQUIRED BY THIS AGREEMENT.

INSURANCE

Without limiting City indemnification and defense of claims obligations to VTA, City must procure and maintain for the duration of the Agreement insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise under or in connection with any work, authority, or jurisdiction associated with the Agreement. The cost o f such insurance must be borne by City . City must furnish complete copies of all insurance policies within three (3) business days of any request for such by VTA.

A. MINIMUM SCOPE OF INSURANCE
Coverage must be at least as broad as:

1. Insurance Services Office General Liability coverage (“occurrence” form CG 0001). General Liability insurance written on a “claims made” basis is not acceptable.

2. Business Auto Coverage, Insurance Services Office form number CA 0001, covering Automobile Liability, code 1 “any auto.” Auto Liability written on a “claims-made” basis is not acceptable.

3. Workers’ Compensation insurance as required by the Labor Code of the State of California and Employer’s Liability insurance.

4. Professional Liability, including limited contractual liability coverage, covering liability arising out of any negligent act, error, mistake or omission in the performance of Contractor’s services under this Contract. This coverage must be continuously maintained for a minimum of two (2) years fo llowing completion of this Contract. This coverage may be written on a “claims made” basis, if so, please see special provisions in Section B.

5. Contractor’s Pollution Liability: covering liability arising out of the treatment, handling, storage, transportation, or accidental release of any hazardous material.

B. MINIMUM LIMITS OF INSURANCE

1. City must maintain limits no less than:

a. General Liability: $5,000,000 limit per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury, and property damage. If General Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate

10.b
Packet Pg. 264
Attachment: Draft Funding Agreement (Hamilton Avenue/Highway 17 Bicycle Overcrossing Planning Study) R
ev. 12/13/2023 Page 16 of 19
limit is used, either the general aggregate limit must apply separately to this project/location or the general aggregate limit must be twice the required occurrence limit. b
. Automobile Liability (including umbrella/excess liability): $5,000,000 limit per accident for bodily injury and property damage. This requirement may be satisfied by a c
ombination of General Liability with Excess or Umbrella. Umbrella/Excess policies must feature inception and expiration dates concurrent with the underlying Automobile Liability policy, “Follow Form” coverage, and a “Drop Down” provision. c. Wo
rkers’ Compensation and Employer’s Liability: Workers’ compensation limits as required by the Labor Code of the State of California and Employer’s Liability limits of $1,000,000 per accident.
d. P
rofessional Liability: $2,000,000 each occurrence/aggregate minimum limit per claim. e. C
ontractor’s Pollution Liability: $3,000,000 per occurrence. This requirement may be satisfied by a combination of Pollution Liability with Excess or Umbrella.

Umbrella/Excess policies must feature inception and expiration dates concurrent with the underlying Pollution Liability policy, “Follow Form” coverage, and a “Drop Down” provision.
2 . Notwithstanding any language in this Lease to the contrary, if City carry insurance limits exceeding the minimum stated in Section B(a)(1) -(3) immediately above, such greater limits will apply to this Agreement.

C. SELF-INSURED RETENTION
Th
e certificate of insurance must disclose the actual amount of any deductible or self- insured retention, or lack thereof, for all coverages required herein. Any self- insured retention or deductible in excess of $ 250,000 must be declared to and approved by VTA. If City are a governmental authority such as a state, municipality or special district, self- insurance is permitted. To apply for approval for a level of retention or deductible in excess of $250,000, City must provide a current financial report includin g balance sheets and income statements for the past three years, so that VTA can assess City’s ability to pay claims falling within the self- insured retention or deductible. Upon review of the financial report, if deemed necessary by VTA in its sole discretion, VTA may elect one of the following options: to accept the existing self -insured retention or deductible; require the insurer to reduce or eliminate the self- insured retention or deductible as respects VTA, its directors, officers, officials, employee s and volunteers; or to require City to procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration and defense expenses. Applicable costs resulting therefrom will be borne solely by City. City may request execution of a nondisclosure agreement prior to submission of financial reports.

D. C

LAIMS MADE PROVISIONS (NOT APPLICABLE TO GENERAL LIABILITY OR AUTO LIABILITY)

10.b
Packet Pg. 265
Attachment: Draft Funding Agreement (Hamilton Avenue/Highway 17 Bicycle Overcrossing Planning Study)

Rev. 12/13/2023 Page 17 of 19

Claims-made coverage is never acceptable for General Liability or Auto Liability. Claims -made may be considered for Professional, Environmental/Pollution, or Cyber Liability. If coverage is written on a claims-made basis, the Certificate of Insurance must clearly state so. In addition to all other coverage requirements, such policy must comply with the following:

1. The policy retroactive date must be no later than the date of this Agreement.

2. If any policy is not renewed or the retroactive date of such policy is to be changed, City must obtain or cause to be obtained the broadest extended reporting period coverage available in the commercial insurance market. This extended reporting provision must cover at least two (2) years.

3. No prior acts exclusion may be added to the policy during the Agreement period.

4. The policy must allow for reporting of circumstances or incidents that might give rise to future claims.

E. OTHER INSURANCE PROVISIONS

The policies must contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:

1. General Liability and Automobile Liability
a. VTA, its directors, officers, officials, employees, and volunteers must be named as additional insureds as respects: liability arising out of City ’s performance under this Agreement. The coverage must contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to VTA, its directors, officers, officials, employees, or volunteers. Additional Insured endorsements must provide coverage at least as broad as afforded by the combination of ISO CG 20 10 10 01 and CG 20 37 10 01.

b. Any failure to comply with reporting provisions of the policies may not affect coverage provided to VTA, its directors, officers, officials, employees, or volunteers.

c. Coverage must state that Lessee’s insurance applies separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer’s liability.

d. The General Liability General Aggregate limit must apply per project, not per policy.

e. The General Liability policy must be endorsed to remove the exclusion for railroad liabilities, with coverage at least as broad as afforded by ISO CG 24 17.

2. All Coverages
a. City must agree to waive all rights of subrogation against VTA, its directors, officers, officials, employees, and volunteers for losses arising under or in connection with any work, authority, or jurisdiction associated with the Agreement.

10.b
Packet Pg. 266
Attachment: Draft Funding Agreement (Hamilton Avenue/Highway 17 Bicycle Overcrossing Planning Study) R
ev. 12/13/2023 Page 18 of 19
b. City’s insurance coverage must be primary insurance as respects VTA, its directors, officers, officials, employees, and volunteers. Self -insurance or insurance that may be maintained by VTA, its directors, officers, officials, employees, or volunteers may appl y onl
y as excess to City’s insurance. City’s insurance must not seek contribution from VTA’s insurance program.

3. O
ther Insurance Provisions
a. Th
e Certificate must disclose the actual amount of the Deductible or Self -Insured Retention.
b
. If any coverage forms or endorsements required by this Agreement are updated by their publishers, whether they be the insurance carrier(s), the Insurance Services office, or the American Association of Insurance Services, during the duration of this Agreement, VTA reserves the rights to require City to procure said coverage forms or endorsements using the updated versions upon the next renewal cycle.

F. ACCE

PTABILITY OF INSURERS
Insurance must be placed with insurers with an A.M. Best’s rating of no less than A VII (financial strength rating of no less than A and financial size category of no less than VII), unless specific prior written approval has been granted by VTA.

G. CE

RTIFICATES OF INSURANCE
City must furnish VTA with a Certificate of Insurance. The certificates for each insurance policy must be signed by an authorized representative of that insurer. The certificates must be issued on a standard ACORD Form. City must instruct their insurance broker/agent to submit all insurance certificates and required notices electronically in PDF format to [email protected]. All endorsements must be attached to the ACORD certificate in a single PDF document.

T
he certificates must (1) identify the insurers, the types of insurance, the insurance limits, the deductibles, and the policy term, (2) include copies of all the actual policy endorsements required herein, and (3) in the “Certificate Holder” box include:

S
anta Clara Valley Transportation Authority (“VTA”)
3331 North First Street
San Jose, CA 95134-1906
I
n the Description of Operations/Locations/Vehicles/Special Items Box, the VTA property leased must appear, the list of policies scheduled as underlying on the Umbrella/Excess policy must be listed, Certificate Holder must be named as additional insured, and Waiver of Subrogation must be indicated as endorsed to all policies as stated in the Agreement documents.

I
t is a condition precedent to granting of this Agreement that all insurance certificates and endorsements be received and approved by VTA before Agreement execution. No occupancy may

10.b
Packet Pg. 267
Attachment: Draft Funding Agreement (Hamilton Avenue/Highway 17 Bicycle Overcrossing Planning Study)

Rev. 12/13/2023 Page 19 of 19

be taken until insurance is in full compliance. VTA reserves the rights to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, at any time.

If City receive notice that any of the insurance policies required by this Attachment may be cancelled or coverage reduced for any reason whatsoever, City must immediately provide written notice to VTA that such insurance policy required by this Attachment is canceled or coverage is reduced.

H. MAINTENANCE OF INSURANCE
If City fail to maintain insurance as required herein, VTA, at its option, may suspend the Agreement until a new policy of insurance is in effect.

Ed. Rev. 10-1-19

10.b
Packet Pg. 268
Attachment: Draft Funding Agreement (Hamilton Avenue/Highway 17 Bicycle Overcrossing Planning Study) City of Campbell
Request for Budget Adjustments
Department/Program Division Date Request No.

January 22, 2024 BA-15
Budget to be Reduced
Fund/Program Account Number Description Amount
Budget to be Increased
Fund/Program Account Number Description Amount
212.535 4571 266,000$
212.990 9999 266,000
221.990 9999 Transfer Out (ARPA Fund) 114,000
435.22YY 7130 135,000
435.22YY 7430 245,000
435.990 6999 Transfer In (from Measure B Grant and ARPA) 380,000 REASON FOR REQUEST - BE SPECIFIC:

Public Works
Will Fuentes Todd Capurso Brian Loventhal
24-YY Hamiliton/SR 17 Bike Overcrossing
Planning Study
To appropriate $380,000 towards the Hamilton Avenue/Highway 17 Bicycle Overcrossing Planning Study (22-YY) project. The project will be funded by a 2016 Measure B Bicycle & Pedestrian Planning Studies Competitive Grant ($266,000) and by American Rescue Plan Act Fund ($114,000).

Transfer Out (State & Other Grants Fund)
2016 Measure B Bicycle & Pedestrian VTA Grant
Consultant Services
Staff Salaries
Finance Director Public Works Director City Manager

10.c
Packet Pg. 269
Attachment: Budget Adjustment (Hamilton Avenue/Highway 17 Bicycle Overcrossing Planning Study) City
Council
Report
TITLE: Public Hearing to Consider Adoption of a Resolution Directing the Community Development Director to Proceed with Abatement of Hazardous Vegetation (Resolution/Roll Call Vote)

RECOMMENDED ACTION
That the City Council adopt a Resolution directing the Community Development Director to proceed with the abatement of hazardous vegetation by the Santa Clara County Consumer and Environmental Protection Agency.

DISCUSSION
The City of Campbell contracts with Santa Clara County to abate hazardous vegetation (weeds) within the City. At its meeting of December 5, 2023, the City Council declared hazardous vegetation to be a public nuisance pursuant to Campbell Municipal Code (CMC) Section 17.54.020. The attached resolution will allow the County to proceed with abatement action on 89 properties identified as having hazardous vegetation (currently or within the last three years).

The Santa Cla ra County Consumer and Environmenta l Protection Agency ha s initiated the abatement program for the 2024 fire season by taking the follow actions:
* Providing notice to the listed property owners by mail; * Giving property owners program guidelines and information to assist them to reach compliance with the Minimum Fire Safety Standards required by the Municipal Code; * Informing property owners of the County's intention to abate this public nuisance unless the property owners return a card indicating their intention to voluntarily maintain their property;
* Informing the property owners that they may also request that the County's contractor perform any necessary abatement services, wherein an assessment may be placed on the tax rolls for services rendered.

This is a public hearing to hear objections from property owners regarding removal of hazardous vegetation on private property or public streets or alleys. Following the public hearing, it would be appropriate for the Council to adopt a resolution directing the Community Development Director to proceed with the abatement of hazardous vegetation by the Santa Clara County Consumer and Environmental Protection Agency.

Item: 11
Category: PUBLIC HEARINGS AND

INTRODUCTION OF

ORDINANCES
Meeting Date: January 22, 2024
11 Packet Pg. 270
Hazardous Vegetation Abatement Page 2 of 2

FISCAL IMPACT
None to the City. The County weed abatement program is funded by fees assessed on the annual property tax roll. This is a reoccurring annual report that has been anticipated in the City's operating budget.

ALTERNATIVES
Take no action on th is Resolution, require that the removal of hazardous vegetation be instigated through Code Enforcement.

Prepared by:

Randy Sweet, Code Enforcement Officer
Reviewed by:

Rob Eastwood, Community
Development Director
Approved by:

Brian Loventhal, City Manager
Attachment:
a. Resolution
b. EXHIBIT A
11 Packet Pg. 271
RESOLUTION NO. __________

BEING A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CAMPBELL

DIRECTING THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR TO PROCEED WITH

THE ABATEMENT OF HAZARDOUS VEGETATION
WHEREAS, hazardous vegetation constituting a public nuisance has been found to exist on those properties described in Exhibit A attached hereto, within the past three years;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Campbell, California, that the Community Development Director is directed to cause the abatement of the aforementioned nuisance.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this _____ day of ___________, 2024, by the following roll call vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAINED: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

APPROVED:
_____________________________
Susan M. Landry, Mayor
ATTEST:
______________________________
Andrea Sanders, City Clerk

11.a
Packet Pg. 272
Attachment: Resolution (Hazardous Vegetation Abatement) Exhibit A
2023 WEED ABATEMENT PROGRAM

COMMENCEMENT REPORT

CITY OF CAMPBELL

EXHIBIT A
Situs APN Owner Address City/State Zip Code
95 S HAMILTON AV 279-27-096 101 SANTA CRUZ AV S LOS GATOS CA 95030-6701 465 W CAMPBELL AV 305-24-021 465 CAMPBELL AV W CAMPBELL CA 95008-1910 230 EL CAMINITO AV 305-34-020 6074 RIDING CT SAN JOSE CA 95124 336 CALIFORNIA ST 305-34-046 19308 BROOKVIEW DR SARATOGA CA 95070-3305 301 BUDD AV 305-35-018 20242 ALMADEN RD SAN JOSE CA 95120 665 GINDEN DR 403-08-072 665 GINDEN DR CAMPBELL CA 95008-4426 599 INWOOD DR 403-08-088 599 INWOOD DR CAMPBELL CA 95008-4407 1445 WESTMONT AV 403-10-116 97 BOSTON AV SAN JOSE CA 95128-1911 1429 WESTMONT AV 403-10-117 97 BOSTON AV SAN JOSE CA 95128 1009 SAN TOMAS AQUINO RD 403-10-124 236 LAS MIRADAS DR LOS GATOS CA 95032-7687 1660 WESTMONT AV 403-13-014 'PO BOX 834 CAMPBELL CA 95009-0834 1320 HACIENDA AV 403-16-102 1320 HACIENDA AV CAMPBELL CA 95008-6324 586 VIRGINIA AV 404-23-037 586 VIRGINIA AV CAMPBELL CA 95008-4606 684 BUDDLAWN WY 404-24-029 684 BUDDLAWN WY CAMPBELL CA 95008-3914 751 BUDD AV 404-24-041 751 BUDD AV CAMPBELL CA 95008-4612 725 KENNETH AV 404-26-014 725 KENNETH AV CAMPBELL CA 95008-4603 738 SOBRATO DR 404-26-016 738 SOBRATO DR CAMPBELL CA 95008-4622 952 W KENNETH AV 404-30-023 787 SUNNY OAKS AV W CAMPBELL CA 95008 936 KENNETH AV 404-30-024 936 KENNETH AV CAMPBELL CA 95008-5332 888 SOBRATO DR 404-30-064 1051 AUDREY AV CAMPBELL CA 95008-6402 850 CONNIE DR 404-32-023 850 CONNIE DR CAMPBELL CA 95008-4514 772 MARILYN DR 404-32-045 772 MARILYN DR CAMPBELL CA 95008-6012 747 MARILYN DR 404-33-002 747 MARILYN DR CAMPBELL CA 95008-6011 759 MARILYN DR 404-33-003 759 MARILYN DR CAMPBELL CA 95008-6011 791 MARILYN DR 404-33-011 791 MARILYN DR CAMPBELL CA 95008-6013 815 MARILYN DR 404-33-013 815 MARILYN DR CAMPBELL CA 95008-6013 944 VIRGINIA AV 404-33-038 302 LAUREL AV MENLO PARK CA 94025

11.a
Packet Pg. 273
Attachment: Resolution (Hazardous Vegetation Abatement) 587 VIRGINIA AV 406-01-006 587 VIRGINIA AV CAMPBELL CA 95008-4605 625 VIRGINIA AV 406-01-009 625 VIRGINIA AV CAMPBELL CA 95008-4605 881 VIRGINIA AV 406-04-068 3913 LUX CT SAN JOSE CA 95136-1954 955 LINDA DR 406-05-017 955 LINDA DR CAMPBELL CA 95008-4505 965 LINDA DR 406-05-018 965 LINDA DR CAMPBELL CA 95008-4505 978 LINDA DR 406-05-037 4156 LAFAYETTE PL CULVER CITY CA 90232-2818 891 CONNIE DR 406-05-045 891 CONNIE DR CAMPBELL CA 95008-4501 1039 CONNIE DR 406-05-058 1039 CONNIE DR CAMPBELL CA 95008-4501 930 S SAN TOMAS AQUINO RD 406-06-006 930 SAN TOMAS AQUINO RD S CAMPBELL CA 95008-4422 939 BUCKNAM AV 406-07-011 939 BUCKNAM AV CAMPBELL CA 95008-5906 1046 LOVELL AV 406-07-016 1046 LOVELL AV CAMPBELL CA 95008-5916 952 LOVELL AV 406-07-024 1630 ALISON AV MOUNTAIN VIEW CA 94040-3016 870 W SUNNYOAKS AV 406-12-047 870 SUNNYOAKS AV W CAMPBELL CA 95008-6046 864 W SUNNYOAKS AV 406-12-048 864 SUNNYOAKS AV W CAMPBELL CA 95008-6046 1190 STEINWAY AV 406-16-008 1190 STEINWAY AV CAMPBELL CA 95008-6329 1109 STEINWAY AV 406-17-001 1109 STEINWAY AV CAMPBELL CA 95008-6332 1017 STEINWAY AV 406-17-035 1017 STEINWAY AV CAMPBELL CA 95008-6424 1052 STEINWAY AV 406-17-042 1052 STEINWAY AV CAMPBELL CA 95008-6425 1018 STEINWAY AV 406-17-047 1018 STEINWAY AV CAMPBELL CA 95008-6425 700 HACIENDA AV 406-19-036 965 LAUREL GLEN DR PALO ALTO CA 94304-1323 1270 THERESA AV 406-19-054 1270 THERESA AV CAMPBELL CA 95008-6833 1429 THERESA AV 406-23-027 1429 THERESA AV CAMPBELL CA 95008-6834 1495 THERESA AV 406-23-031 3142 IMPALA DR A SAN JOSE CA 95117 1001 AUDREY AV 406-24-002 1001 AUDREY AV CAMPBELL CA 95008-6402 1032 AUDREY AV 406-24-027 1032 AUDREY AV CAMPBELL CA 95008-6403 1451 VALE AV 406-24-028 1451 VALE AV CAMPBELL CA 95008-6412 1247 E POLLARD RD 406-25-014 295 HOLLOW WY E DINUBA CA 93618-3906 1500 CAMDEN AV 414-04-005 3426 KATHLEEN ST SAN JOSE CA 95124-2135 1506 WHITE OAKS RD 414-36-012 1873 HUXLEY CT SAN JOSE CA 95125-5927 1490 WHITE OAKS AV 414-36-015 1873 HUXLEY CT SAN JOSE CA 95125-5927 1766 WHITE OAKS RD 414-40-011 19542 CHARDONNAY CT SARATOGA CA 95070-4460

11.a
Packet Pg. 274
Attachment: Resolution (Hazardous Vegetation Abatement) 95 HAMILTON AV
499 HAMILTON AV
465 CAMPBELL AV
380 CALIFORNIA ST
336 CALIFORNIA ST
301 BUDD AV
599 INWOOD DR
1445 WESTMONT RD
1429 WESTMONT AV
1009 SAN TOMAS AQUINO RD
1660 WESTMONT AV
1410 WESTMONT AV
1265 BURROWS RD
1615 WESTMONT AV
1625 WESTMONT AV
780 JEFFREY AV
586 VIRGINIA AV
684 BUDDLAWN WY
751 BUDD AV
781 JEFFREY AV
725 KENNETH AV
738 SOBRATO DR
936 KENNETH AV
912 SOBRATO DR
888 SOBRATO DR
800 SOBRATO DR
611 LAURA DR
621 LAURA DR
629 LAURA DR
775 SUNNYOAKS AV
803 SUNNYOAKS AV
817 SUNNYOAKS AV
850 CONNIE DR
816 MARILYN DR
772 MARILYN DR
805 SHARMON PALMS LN
817 SHARMON PALMS LN
747 MARILYN DR
759 MARILYN DR
815 MARILYN DR
944 VIRGINIA AV

EXHIBIT A
Situs

11.b
Packet Pg. 275
Attachment: EXHIBIT A (Hazardous Vegetation Abatement) 826 WALDO RD
587 VIRGINIA AV
625 VIRGINIA AV
904 HAZEL AV
881 VIRGINIA AV
955 LINDA DR
965 LINDA DR
975 LINDA DR
978 LINDA DR
891 CONNIE DR
973 CONNIE DR
1039 CONNIE DR
930 SAN TOMAS AQUINO RD
908 KARA WY
865 BUCKNAM AV
925 BUCKNAM AV
939 BUCKNAM AV
1046 LOVELL AV
1032 LOVELL AV
986 LOVELL AV
952 LOVELL AV
1030 CONNIE DR
1008 CONNIE DR
976 CONNIE DR
870 SUNNYOAKS AV
864 SUNNYOAKS AV
1190 STEINWAY AV
1236 HACIENDA AV
1109 STEINWAY AV
1017 STEINWAY AV
1052 STEINWAY AV
1018 STEINWAY AV
700 HACIENDA AV
1270 THERESA AV
1429 THERESA AV
1461 THERESA AV
999 PARR AV
1560 VALE AV
1001 AUDREY AV
1080 AUDREY AV
1032 AUDREY AV
1451 VALE AV
1247 POLLARD RD
1420 BURROWS RD
1500 CAMDEN AV
1506 WHITE OAKS RD
1490 WHITE OAKS AV

11.b
Packet Pg. 276
Attachment: EXHIBIT A (Hazardous Vegetation Abatement) 1766 WHITE OAKS RD

11.b
Packet Pg. 277
Attachment: EXHIBIT A (Hazardous Vegetation Abatement)

City
Council
Report

TITLE: Public Hearing to Consider the Request of Taeho Um & Associates on Behalf of Michele M. Babb for a Zoning Exception to Allow the Construction of Approximately 323 Square Foot Single -Car Garage with a Reduced Setback to the Public Right Way (Alley), on Property Located at 20 Alice Avenue, Commonly Known as the Mary Fablinger House, Within the Alice Avenue Historic District and in the R -1-6-H (Single-Family Residential/Historic Overlay Combining Zoning District). File No.: PLN-2023-127. (Resolution/Roll Call Vote)

RECOMMENDED ACTION

The Historic Preservation Board recommends that the City Council adopt a Resolution approving a Zoning Exception to allow the construction of approximately 323 square foot single-car garage with a reduced setback to the public right way (alley).

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
Staff recommends that the City Council accept the determination that this application is Categorically Exempt under Section 15331, Class 31 of the California Environment Quality Act (CEQA), pertaining to projects involving the maintenance, rehabilitation, restoration, preservation, or reconstruction of historical resources, provided that the activity is consistent with The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties.

PROJECT DATA
Zoning Designation: R-1-6-H (Single-Family Residential / Historic Overlay) General Plan
Designation:

Low-Density Residential (less than 7.5 units/gr. acre)
Net Lot Area: 7,373 square-feet 6,000 (Min. Required)
Building Height:

Proposed (ADU): 12 feet, 6.5 inches 18 feet (Max. Allowed) Proposed (Garage): 12 feet, 6.5 inches 35 feet (Max. Allowed) Building Square
Footage:

Item: 12
Category: PUBLIC HEARINGS AND

INTRODUCTION OF

ORDINANCES
Meeting Date: January 22, 2024
12 Packet Pg. 278
PLN-2023-127 20 Alice Avenue Page 2 of 10
ADU: 573 square-feet Exempt1
Garage: 333 square-feet
Existing Primary
Dwelling:
1,748 square-feet
2,654 square-feet Total (Total Floor Area)
Front Porch: 56 square-feet
2,710 square-feet Total (Lot Coverage)
Floor Area Ratio (FAR): 0.28 0.45 (Max. Allowed)
Building (Lot) Coverage: 29% 40% (Max. Allowed)
Parking: 1 covered & 1 uncovered
stall
Exempt2
Setbacks (Garage):

To Primary Dwelling: 10 feet, 2 inches 10 feet (Min. Required) Side (West) 4 feet 4 feet (Min. Required)
Rear (South): 9 feet 25 feet (Min. Required)3
Backup distance: 25 feet4 25 feet (min. Required)
Setbacks (ADU):

To Primary Dwelling: 14 feet, 2 inches Exempt
Side (East): 4 feet 4 feet (Min. Required)
Rear (South): 4 feet, 2 inches 4 feet (Min. Required)

DISCUSSION
Project Site: The 7,373 square -foot project site is located along Alice Avene, between Winchester Boulevard and South First Street, within the Alice Avenue Historic District, as shown on the aerial map, below. The property is surrounded by residences to the north, south, and east, and a professional office directly to the west. 1Pursuant to CMC Section 21.23.027, a statewide exemption accessory dwelling unit shall be exempt from certain development standards such as lot coverage, floor area, and building separation that would otherwise be required.
2 The Project Site is located within a one-half mile of the Downtown Campbell Station along the Green Line light rail route, and therefore not subject to the City’s parking requirement per AB 2097. 3A reduction to the standard is the basis of this Zoning Exception request. 4 Inclusive of the 16-foot alley right-of-way, plus 9-ft on-site backup distance. 12 Packet Pg. 279
PLN-2023-127 20 Alice Avenue Page 3 of 10

Historic Significance: The property is currently developed with a single -family residence in a vernacular style constructed around 1939, commonly known as the Mary Fablinger House, along with an existing detached garage (reference Attachment B – Project Plans). According to the City's current DPR (Department of Parks and Recreation) form, the home was constructed for Mary Fablinger, a Campbell Grammar School teacher (reference Attachment C– DPR Form). The property is located within the Alice Avenue Historic District recognized during the mid -l980s survey, and designated as a historic district under Ordinance 1640, by the City Council.

Property Background : On November 28, 2017, the Planning Commission approved a Conditional Use Permit 5 with an Historic Exception to allow a 950 square -foot addition to the primary dwelling and a new detached garage with a reduced setback between the garage and the house. This approval expired without a building permit being issued.

On July 22, 2020, the Historic Preservation Board recommended approval of a Tier 1 Historic Resource Alteration Permit to allow an 804 square foot rear addition to residence. This permit was approved by the Community Development Director and the work was permitted and completed later in 2020.

Proposal: This application seeks approval for a Zoning Exception to demolish an existing detached garage and to construct a 323 square foot single -car garage attached to new accessory dwelling (ADU) located behind the historic residence 6. Specifically, this project proposes a reduced setback for the garage from the rear alley, inclusive of an exception to the requirement for a 25 -feet setback to the public right -of-way (CMC

5 The former Historic Preservation Ordinance required a Conditional Use Permit for any alterations to a landmark or historic district structure.
6 The proposed ADU falls under a "statewide exemption" due to its size (not exceeding 800 square feet), height (maximum of 18 feet), and providing provision of minimum setbacks of 4 feet from the rear and side property lines. Although the ADU itself is exempt from certain standards, the proposed attached garage does not qualify for all the same exemptions. The Municipal Code only grants additional exemptions for the "living area" portion of the statewide exemption ADU, which affects setbacks, floor area ratio, lot coverage, and encroachment into open space, as specified in CMC Section 21.23.027. 12 Packet Pg. 280
PLN-2023-127 20 Alice Avenue Page 4 of 10
Sec. 21.08.050, Table 2 -4) and an associated reduction to 25 -foot minimum driveway length (CMC Sec. 21.28.090.B.1.b), to allow the garage to be placed at a 9 -feet rear setback.

Administrative Procedure : As identified under the "Incentives for preserving Historic Resources" section of the Historic Preservation Ordinance (CMC Sec. 21.33.150), a Zoning Exception is a land use permit intended to "provide a degree of flexibility from the Zoning Ordinance as necessary to minimize impact to the historic character of a historic resource." This mechanism may be utilized to consider a deviation from any zoning code standard, provided that the City Council, as the decision -making body, can affirmatively establish the findings for approval, as discussed under 'Analysis'.

A Historic Resource Alteration Permit is not required for this proposal since the construction of a garage attached to a new ADU does not directly "alter" the historic residence, as specified by CMC Sec. 21.33.080, and would otherwise not be subject to discretionary review by the City. Moreover, the existing detached garage to be demolished is not identified as an element of the "historic resource" of this particular property as described by the DPR form such that it may be demolished without consideration of a Historic Resource Alteration Permit. Pursuant to CMC Sec.

21.33.080.B, the Historic Preservation Board met on December 6, 2023, and adopted a resolution by a 3-0 vote recommending that the City Council approve the project.

ANALYSIS
Findings for Approval: In order to recommend approval of the Zoning Exception, the City Council must affirmatively determine the project meets findings for approval. Findings establish the evidentiary basis for a City's decision to grant or deny a land use approval and to impose conditions of approval necessary to meet the findings. The following identifies each finding in italics, followed by staff's assessment:

1. The zoning exception will facilitate development and use of a historic resource in a manner that is more consistent with its historic character than would be possible under strict compliance with the Zoning Ordinance; Yes. The applicant is proposing to construct a new detached garage at the back of their property, fully behind the existing residence, with access from the rear alley. This configuration aligns with current Zoning Code stipulations, specifically CMC Section

21.36.020, which dictates that accessory structures
should not be positioned in the front half of the lot or in front of the primary dwelling, but rather behind or to the side of it.

This arrangement supports the property's historic
integrity. The City's Historic Design Guidelines for
Residential Buildings advocates for the positioning of garages at the rear of the property to minimize their visual impact when viewed from the street, thereby maintaining a traditional site layout akin to historical carriage houses 12 Packet Pg. 281
PLN-2023-127 20 Alice Avenue Page 5 of 10
and auxiliary buildings as described within the “Garages” section of Chapter 4. This section also recommends that newly constructed garages be detached from the historic primary structure when possible. Opting for a detached garage helps preserve the historic dwelling's original materials and construction. This approach avoids the need to remove or alter historic materials, which is often necessary when attaching a new structure.

As pictured right, the Guidelines specify that when an alley is present, it should be utilized for vehicular access. This indicates that driveway access to an alley, even if reduced in length, may be preferred in a historic context to an otherwise conforming 25 - foot setback garage that takes access from the street.

Furthermore, the proposed location of the garage is the only feasible option for alley access, given the presence of an existing PG&E power pole and its accompanying guy
wire along the property's alley boundary, which precludes the use of the eastern half of the lot for driveway
purposes, as shown, right:

Additionally, the presence of a large Walnut tree in the backyard also presents a construction challenge.

Relocating the garage to the area occupied by the tree
would lead to its removal, which would conflict with
General Plan Policy CD -2.3's guidance to retain mature trees where possible.
12 Packet Pg. 282
PLN-2023-127 20 Alice Avenue Page 6 of 10
As illustrated below, the factors outlined above limit the options for positioning a detached garage on the property. The location proposed by the applicant aligns more closely with the historic character of the area than under strict compliance with the Zoning Ordinance.

2. The zoning exception will not adversely impact property or public rights -of-way in the surrounding neighborhood or within a historic district; Yes. As mentioned above, the proposed garage placed completely behind the existing primary dwelling ensures its minimal visual impact from Alice Avenue, the main public -right-of-way. This design decision upholds the architectural integrity and historical aesthetic of the Alice Avenue Historic District, an area characterized by its historic development primarily from 1917 to 1940.

Per the Alice Avenue Context Statement (2003) , the tract was laid out with the alley running along the back of the lots, which “did away with individual driveways if so desired." For this reason, many of the houses within the district have a similar development pattern with a primary dwelling in the front half of the lot, and a detached garage with alley access located behind the house as depicted below in the 1928 Sanborn Map.
12 Packet Pg. 283
PLN-2023-127 20 Alice Avenue Page 7 of 10

Throughout the years as more lots were constructed, the development pattern remained consistent with this initial layout, and 10 of the 18 lots with ally access currently have rear garages that take alley access with a reduced setback lesser than 25 -feet. Several more lots feature existing rear structures that may have originally been detached rear garages that were subsequently converted, as seen in the aerial image below. For this reason, the construction of a rear garage at 20 Alice Avenue would not adversely affect the neighborhood of the historic district.

3. The zoning exception will not negatively impact the integrity or historic characteristics of the historic resource;
Yes. As, noted, the proposed project would not physically alter the historic primary dwelling. And as discussed in Finding No. 1, the proposal would not alter the existing sightline from Alice Avenue to the primary dwelling, in keeping with the guidance of The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties.

With regard to the demolition of the existing detached garage, the applicant previously prepared an historic analysis which was included as an attachment in the 2017 Planning Commission Staff Report (reference Attachment D). Although the garage appears to have been built around the same time as the home, the analysis indicates that the garage structure is not eligible for historic listing on City's HRI or the State Register. The structure is dilapidated and would be difficult to use as a garage in its existing condition due to its small footprint (~14’ - 4” x 17’ -11”), low ceiling height (~7 -feet), and narrow entryway (~6 -feet, 7 inches). As a result, the proposed removal would not impact the historic integrity of the property.

4. The zoning exception is the minimum departure from the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance; and
Yes. While the request does seek deviation from the code to allow a reduced garage setback, this can be viewed as a minimum departure. According to CMC Section 21.28.090.B.1, sites should maintain at least a twenty -five-foot on -site 12 Packet Pg. 284
PLN-2023-127 20 Alice Avenue Page 8 of 10
driveway measured from the public right-of-way. This requirement primarily serves to provide enough room for vehicles to back up safely before entering a public street. The applicant is proposing a 9-foot garage setback to create a total backup distance of 25-feet including the 16 feet of the alleyway. Although this layout does not strictly follow the code's requirement to exclude public right of way, it does fulfill the intent by providing sufficient backup space at twenty-five feet.

In this case, the alley is less active than a typical public right -of-way. The volume of vehicles utilizing this alley is generally limited to residents of the adjacent homes, as it does not serve as a convenient thoroughfare for the general public. In addition, the alley at 16-feet is much narrower than the standard 30-foot street, and it naturally limits traffic to a single lane in one direction. The General Plan’s 'Safe Streets' chapter suggests that fewer travel lanes can lead to slower vehicle speeds. In such a low-speed environment, the potential hazards posed by shorter backup distances are reduced. Moreover, the City’s Traffic Engineer has reviewed the application and does not object to the proposed reduced garage setback, as conditioned. For this reason, the proposal would not adversely impact property or public rights-of-way.

As such, this proposal may be considered a minimal departure because although this layout does not strictly adhere the Zoning Code's setback requirements from the public right of way, it effectively aligns with the code's fundamental objective of ensuring a 25-foot backup space is provided.

5. The zoning exception is in conformance with the General Plan, adopted area plan, and applicable design guidelines.

The proposal includes the construction of a single -car garage with a reduced setback to the public right -of-way, designed to be compatible with the existing character and development pattern of the surrounding neighborhood, particularly within the historic Alice Avenue District. The proposed project does not negatively impact the integrity of the historic resource, as the new structure will be completely detached and is designed to be compatible and complementary to the historic character of the district, which is in line with the preservation standards and historic design guidelines consistent with the following General Plan policies and applicable garage placement provisions within The Design Guidelines for Historic Residential Buildings, as discussed above.

Policy LU-2.5: Promote new development and additions that are designed to maintain and support the existing character and
development pattern of the surrounding neighborhood,
especially in historic neighborhoods and neighborhoods with consistent design characteristics.

Action CD-1.d: Implement the Historical Design Guidelines for Residential Buildings to ensure that improvements and additions to
historic buildings are compatible with existing historic architecture and conform to historically established building forms, character and setbacks of the neighborhood.
12 Packet Pg. 285
PLN-2023-127 20 Alice Avenue Page 9 of 10
Policy COS-5.3: Use the preservation standards outlined in the city’s Historic Design Guidelines for Residential Buildings and the current Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties with Guidelines for Preserving,
Rehabilitating, Restoring and Reconstructing.

Policy CD-1.6: Preserve, rehabilitate or restore the city’s historic buildings, landmarks, districts and cultural resources and retain the architectural integrity of established building patterns within historic residential neighborhoods to preserve the cultural heritage of the community.

Policy CD-2.3: Emphasize landscaping as a fundamental design component, retaining mature landscaping when appropriate, to reinforce a sense of the natural environment and to
maintain an established appearance.

Public Comment: The project was noticed to all property owners within 300 feet of the subject property and publicized in the newspaper (Metro). No public comment was received on this application.

Attachments:

A. Draft Resolution
B. Project Plans
C. DPR Form
D. 2017 Planning Commission Staff Report
Prepared by:

Larissa Lomen, Assistant Planner
Reviewed by:

Rob Eastwood, Community
Development Director
Approved by:
12 Packet Pg. 286
Brian Loventhal, City Manager
PLN-2023-127 20 Alice Avenue Page 10 of 10
Attachment:
a. Draft Resolution
b. Project Plans
c. DPR Form
d. Historic Analysis
12 Packet Pg. 287
RESOLUTION NO. ____

BEING A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

CAMPBELL APPROVING A ZONING EXCEPTION TO ALLOW THE
CONSTRUCTION OF APPROXIMATELY 323 SQUARE FOOT

SINGLE-CAR GARAGE WITH A REDUCED SETBACK TO THE
PUBLIC RIGHT WAY (ALLEY), ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 20

ALICE AVENUE WITHIN THE ALICE AVENUE HISTORIC DISTRICT,

COMMONLY KNOWN AS THE MARY FABLINGER HOUSE IN THE
R-1-6-H (SINGLE -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL/HISTORIC OVERLAY)
COMBINING ZONING DISTRICT. FILE NO.: PLN-2023-127

After notification and public hearing, as specified by law and after presentation by the Community Development Director, proponents and opponents, the hearing was closed.

The City Council finds as follows with regard to the recommended approval of a Zoning Exception:

1. The project site is a 7,373 square-foot parcel located on the south side of Alice Avenue, between Winchester Boulevard and South First Street, within the Alice Avenue Historic District.

2. The Project Site is zoned R-1-6-H (Single -Family Residential/Historic Overlay Combining Zoning District) as shown on the Campbell Zoning Map.

3. The Project S ite is designated Low-Density Residential (<7.5 units/gr. Acre) as shown on the City of Campbell General Plan Land Use diagram.

4. The Subject Property is currently developed with a single -family residence in a vernacular style constructed around 1939, commonly known as the Mary Fablinger House along with an existing detached garage. The property is located within the Alice Avenue Historic District which was recognized during the mid-l980s survey, and designated as a historic district under Ordinance 1640, by the City Council.

5. The Proposed Project does not include a Tier 1 Historic Resource Alteration Permit because the construction of a garage attached to a new ADU does not directly "alter" the historic residence, as specified by CMC Sec. 21.33.080. Moreover, the existing detached garage to be demolished is not described as an element of the "historic resource" of this particular property as established by the DPR form such that it may be demolished without consideration of a Historic Resource Alteration Permit.

6. The Proposed Project is an application for a Zoning Exception to demolish an existing detached garage and to build a new 573 square foot Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) with an attached 323 square foot single- car garage. This construction proposes a reduced setback from the rear alley, which serves as the public right -of- way.

7. The provision for a Zoning Exception is articulated within the "Incentives for preserving Historic Resources" framework as stipulated in the Historic Preservation

12.a
Packet Pg. 288
Attachment: Draft Resolution (PLN-2023-127 20 Alice Avenue) City Council Resolution Page 2 of 4
PLN-2023-127 ~ 20 Alice Ave. ~ Zoning Exception
Ordinance, particularly in CMC Sec. 21.33.150. This permit serves to offer flexibility regarding the Zoning Ordinance to ensure that the historical integrity of a recognized historic asset is maintained, thereby reducing potential adverse effects on its historical significance.

8. T
he Proposed Project is compliant with Zoning Code CMC Section 21.36.020 and supports the City's Historic Design Guidelines by maintaining the property's historic integrity. The location is the only viable option due to an existing PG&E power pole and guy wire and the presence of a large Walnut tree, which the City aims to preserve according to General Plan Policy CD-2.3 and CMC Section 21.32.010.

9. T
he Proposed Project is consistent with the historical layout of the Alice Avenue Historic District, maintaining the area's aesthetic and adhering to established patterns of alley-accessed garages behind primary dwellings, without impacting the district's character.

10. T
he Proposed Project, with its 9- foot garage setback and use of a 16- foot alleyway, provides a total 25- foot backup distance, aligning with the safety intent outlined in CMC Section 21.28.090.B.1. The alley’s limited local use, narrow width for one- way traffic, and slow speeds justif ies the proposed reduced backup distance and further supports the project's adherence to safety standards.

11. T
he Proposed Project would be consistent with the following General Plan policies and strategies:

P
olicy LU-2.5: Promote new development and additions that are designed to maintain and support the existing character and development pattern of the surrounding neighborhood, especially in historic neighborhoods and neighborhoods with consistent design
characteristics.

Policy COS-5.3: Use the preservation standards outlined in the city’s Historic Design Guidelines for Residential Buildings and the current Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties with Guidelines for Preserving, Rehabilitating, Restoring and Reconstructing
Policy CD-1.6: Preserve, rehabilitate or restore the city’s historic buildings, landmarks, districts and cultural resources and retain the architectural integrity of established building patterns within historic residential neighborhoods to preserve the cultural heritage of the community.

12.a
Packet Pg. 289
Attachment: Draft Resolution (PLN-2023-127 20 Alice Avenue) City Council Resolution Page 3 of 4
PLN-2023-127 ~ 20 Alice Ave. ~ Zoning Exception

12. Approval of a Zoning Exception does not relieve the property owners from the requirements of Chapter 21.23 (Accessory Dwelling Units) of the Campbell Municipal Code.

13. There is a reasonable relationship and a rough proportionality between the Conditions of Approval and the impacts of the project.

14. There is a reasonable relationship between the use of the fees imposed upon the project and the type of development project.

15. No substantial evidence has been presented which shows that the project, as currently presented and subject to the required conditions of approval, will have a significant adverse impact on the environment.

Based upon the foregoing findings of fact, the City Council further finds and concludes that:

2. The zoning exception will not adversely impact property or public rights-of-way in the surrounding neighborhood or within a historic district;

3. The zoning exception will not negatively impact the integrity or historic characteristics of the historic resource;

4. The zoning exception is the minimum departure from the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance;

5. The zoning exception is in conformance with the General Plan, adopted area plan, and applicable design guidelines; and

6. This project is Categorically Exempt under Section 15331, Class 31 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pertaining to projects involving the maintenance, rehabilitation, restoration, preservation, or reconstruction of historical resources, provided that the activity is consistent with The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties.

THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approves a Zoning Exception (PLN-2023-127) to demolish an existing detached garage and to construct a new detached 323 square foot single- car garage with a reduced setback from the rear alley, which serves as the public right -of-way, on property with an existing single- family dwelling within the Alice Avenue Historic District , commonly known as the Mary Fablinger House, for property located at 20 Alice Avenue, subject to the attached Conditions of Approval (attached Exhibit A).

12.a
Packet Pg. 290
Attachment: Draft Resolution (PLN-2023-127 20 Alice Avenue) City Council Resolution Page 4 of 4
PLN-2023-127 ~ 20 Alice Ave. ~ Zoning Exception
PASSED AND ADOPTED this _______ day of ___________, 2024, by the following roll call vote:

AYES: Me
mbers:

NOES: Members:

ABSENT: Members:

ABSTAIN: Members:

APPR
OVED:

Susan M. Landry, Mayor
A
TTEST:

Andrea Sanders, City Clerk

12.a
Packet Pg. 291
Attachment: Draft Resolution (PLN-2023-127 20 Alice Avenue)

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
PLN-2023-127

Where approval by the Director of Community Development, City Engineer, Public Works Director, City Attorney or Fire Department is required, that review shall be for compliance with all applicable conditions of approval, adopted policies and guidelines, ordinances, laws and regulations and accepted engineering practices for the item under review. Additionally, the applicant is hereby notified that he/she is required to comply with all applicable Codes or Ordinances of the City of Campbell and the State of California that pertain to this development and are not herein specified.

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Planning Division

1. Approved Project: Approval is granted for a Zoning Exception (PLN-2022-145) to allow the construction of approximately 323 square foot single- car garage with a reduced setback to the public right way (alley), on property located at 20 Alice Avenue commonly known as the Mary Fablinger House, within the Alice Avenue Historic District. The project shall substantially conform to the Project Plans included as Attachment D in the January 22, 2023 City Council Staff Report, except as may be modified by conditions of approval contained herein.

2. P ermit Expiration: Approval of the Zoning Exception ("Approval") shall be valid for one (1) year from the effective date of the City Council action. Within this one- year period a building permit must be issued. Failure to meet this deadline or expiration of an issued building permit will result in the Approval being rendered void

3. DPR Form: Prior to planning final inspection, an updated Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR) 523 Form, prepared by a qualified professional, reflecting the approved project and prior additions and alterations, shall be submitted and accepted by the Community Development Director.

4. P lanning Final Required: Planning Division clearance is required prior to Building Permit final. Construction not in substantial compliance with the approved project plans shall not be approved without prior authorization of the necessary approving body.

5. T imely Completion : Once under construction it shall be the obligation of the property owner and contractor to demonstrate continued progress on the project. In the event the building permit expires, the City may impose fines or exercise administrative remedies to compel timely completion of work.

6. Additional Alterations : Architectural refinements and other minor revisions to the Approved Project Plans may be administratively approved by the Community Development Director pursuant to CMC Sec. 21.56.060.

7. Fences/Walls: Except as noted below, any newly proposed fencing and/or walls shall comply with Campbell Municipal Code Section 21.18.060 and shall be submitted for review and approval by the Community Development Department.

12.a
Packet Pg. 292
Attachment: Draft Resolution (PLN-2023-127 20 Alice Avenue) Exhibit A – Conditions of Approval ~ 20 Alice Avenue Page 2 of 2 PLN-2023-127 – Zoning Exception

8. Accessory Dwelling Unit: The proposed statewide exemption accessory dwelling unit permitted under this section shall not be allowed to expand the living area beyond 800 square feet.

9. Construction Activities: The applicant shall abide by the following requirements during construction:
a. T he project site shall be posted with the name and contact number of the lead contractor in a location visible from the public street prior to the issuance of building permits.
b. Construction activities shall be limited to weekdays between 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. and Saturdays between 9:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. No construction shall take place on Sundays or holidays unless an exception is granted by the Building Official.
c. All construction equipment with internal combustion engines used on the project site shall be properly muffled and maintained in good working condition. d. Unnecessary idling of internal combustion engines shall be strictly prohibited. e. All stationary noise -generating construction equipment, such as air compressors and portable power generators, shall be located as far as possible from noise- sensitive receptors such as existing residences and businesses. f. Use standard dust and erosion control measures that comply with the adopted Best Management Practices for the City of Campbell.

B
uilding Division

10. Permit Required: A building permit application shall be required for the proposed project. The building permit shall include Electrical/Plumbing/Mechanical fees when such work is part of the permit.

11. Conditions of Approval: The Conditions of Approval shall be stated in full on the cover sheet of construction plans submitted for building permit.

12. Construction Fencing: The property shall be properly enclosed with construction fencing to prevent unauthorized access to the site during construction. The construction site shall be secured to prevent vandalism and/or theft during hours when no work is being done. All protected trees shall be fenced to prevent damage to root systems in compliance with the Standards for Tree Protection During Construction.

12.a
Packet Pg. 293
Attachment: Draft Resolution (PLN-2023-127 20 Alice Avenue) NOTES

SYMBOL LEGEND

SCOPE OF WORK

BUILDING DATA

VICINITY MAP
Effective Codes:

ABBREVIATIONS
>
O
@
L
&
<
#
PL
2022 California Building Code
2022 California Mechanical Code
2022 California Plumbing Code
2022 California Electrical Code
2022 California Energy Code
2022 California Green Building Code
2022 California Fire Code
2022 California Residential Code
ZoningR-1-6-H
OccupancyR-3/U
UseSingle Family Dwelling
Const. TypeV-B
No. of Stories1
APN :412-04-052
Built in 1939
Automatic Fire Sprinkler : Not Installed
Lot size : 7371.5 SQ.FT.
(E) Main Unit: 4BR + 3BA
(N) ADU Unit: 1BR + 1BA + 1 CAR GARAGE
Floor Area:
(E) Main Unit: 2,005.8 SQ. FT.
(N) ADU: 572.8 SQ. FT.

Sub Total: 2,578.6 SQ. FT.

Non Conditioned Space:
(N) Garage : 322.7 SQ. FT.

Floor Area Ratio (FAR):
(2578.6) / 7,317.5 = 35.2% < 45%
Lot Coverage Ratio:
(2578.6 + 322.7) / 7317.5
= 39.6 % < 40%
Building Setback For ADU
Side Yards 4 FT (12 FT for street side)
Rear Yard 4 FT
Distance from main building 10 ft
Design Data

PROJECT DIRECTORY
Project OwnerGeneral Contractor
Michele Babb
408.960.9923
[email protected]

BABB RESIDENCE
(N) ADU
at
20 Alice Ave.

Campbell, CA 95008
TRUE
NORTH

PROJECT

LOCATION

SHEET INDEX
A1.0 DESIGN DATA / NOTES / SITE PLAN
A1.1 SITE PHOTO GRAPH
BT1 BOUNDARY & TOPO GRAPHIC SURVEY PLAN
A2.0 EXISTING FLOOR PLAN
A3.0 PROPOSED AUD FLOOR PLAN / PROPOSED ROOF PLAN /

WINDOW & DOOR SCHEDULE
A3.1 1 HR FIRE RATED WALL ASSEMBLY / ELEVATIONS
A4.0 PROPOSED SECTIONS
A5.0 DESIGN BOARD
T1 TREE PROTECTION PLAN
* (N) ADU (572.8 SQFT) WITH (N) GARAGE (322.7 SQFT)
* DEMO (E) GARAGE (256 SQFT)
Energy Consultant
Eduardo Tijerina
Green Solutions
661.300.0690
[email protected]
Designer & Engineer
650.208.5251
Taeho Um & Associates
Structural Engineers
[email protected]
R e m O d e l i n g 310-691-3424
Jacob Orr
[email protected]
SITE PLAN1
SCALE 1/8" = 1'-0"TRUE
NORTH
FIRE HYDRANT LOCATION12
SCALE 1/8" = 1'-0"
TRUE
NORTH
Campbell, CA 95008
20 Alice Ave.

DATE
DRAWN
SCALE: AS SHOWN
JOB NO.

CKE NO.

SHEET NO.

REVISIONS

DRAWING TITLE

23.303.A
TU
030123
Taeho Um &
Associates
Structural Engineers
1 T. 650.208.5251
[email protected]
34781 Maple St. Ste K.

Fremont, CA 94536
2 BABB

RESIDENCE ADU
TU

PLAN CHECK COMMENTS
5-30-2023
PLANNING DEPT. COMMENTS
8-11-2023

TITLE /

DESIGN DATA /

GENERAL NOTES /

SITE PLAN
A1.0

12.b
Packet Pg. 294
Attachment: Project Plans (PLN-2023-127 20 Alice Avenue) Campbell, CA 95008
20 Alice Ave.

DATE
DRAWN
SCALE: AS SHOWN
JOB NO.

CKE NO.

SHEET NO.

REVISIONS

DRAWING TITLE

23.303.A
TU
030123
Taeho Um &
Associates
Structural Engineers
1 T. 650.208.5251
[email protected]
34781 Maple St. Ste K.

Fremont, CA 94536
2 BABB

RESIDENCE ADU
TU

PLAN CHECK COMMENTS
5-30-2023
PLANNING DEPT. COMMENTS
8-11-2023

SITE PHOTOGRAPHY
A1.1

12.b
Packet Pg. 295
Attachment: Project Plans (PLN-2023-127 20 Alice Avenue)

12.b
Packet Pg. 296
Attachment: Project Plans (PLN-2023-127 20 Alice Avenue) (E) FLOOR PLAN - MAIN UNITSCALE 1/4" = 1'-0"1TRUENORTH (E) ROOF PLAN - MAIN UNITSCALE 1/4" = 1'-0"2TRUENORTH Campbell, CA 9500820 Alice Ave.

DATEDRAWNSCALE: AS SHOWNJOB NO.CKE NO.SHEET NO.

REVISIONS

DRAWING TITLE

23.303.ATU030123 Taeho Um &AssociatesStructural Engineers 1 T. [email protected] Maple St. Ste K.Fremont, CA 94536 2 BABBRESIDENCE ADU
TU
PLAN CHECK COMMENTS5-30-2023PLANNING DEPT. COMMENTS8-11-2023(E) & DEMO FLOOR PLAN /PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN A2.0

12.b
Packet Pg. 297
Attachment: Project Plans (PLN-2023-127 20 Alice Avenue) PROPOSED FLOOR PLANSCALE 1/4" = 1'-0"1
PROPOSED FLOOR PLANSCALE 1/4" = 1'-0"2TRUENORTH

TRUENORTH
SERIAL
Bathroom reinforcementSCALE 1/4" = 1'-0"13
’

KITCHEN REMODEL NOTES
Campbell, CA 9500820 Alice Ave.

DATEDRAWNSCALE: AS SHOWNJOB NO.CKE NO.SHEET NO.

REVISIONS

DRAWING TITLE

12.b
Packet Pg. 298
Attachment: Project Plans (PLN-2023-127 20 Alice Avenue) PROPOSED WEST ELEVATION3SCALE 1/4" = 1'-0"
PROPOSED SOUTH ELEVATION5SCALE 1/4" = 1'-0"
PROPOSED NORTH ELEVATION4SCALE 1/4" = 1'-0"
PROPOSED EAST ELEVATION6SCALE 1/4" = 1'-0"1 HR FIRE RATED ASSEMBLYSCALE 1/4" = 1'-0"1 Campbell, CA 9500820 Alice Ave.

DATEDRAWNSCALE: AS SHOWNJOB NO.CKE NO.SHEET NO.

REVISIONS

DRAWING TITLE

12.b
Packet Pg. 299
Attachment: Project Plans (PLN-2023-127 20 Alice Avenue) 
PROPOSED SECTIONSCALE 1/4" = 1'-0"2AREA CALCULATIONSCALE 1/4" = 1'-0"3 PROPOSED SECTIONSCALE 1/4" = 1'-0"1
TYP. SKY LIGHT11
” ” ” ’” ’’” ” ” ’ ”
” ⅛” ”
“”

BATHROOM REMODEL NOTES
˚ ˚

LAUNDRY REMODEL NOTES
Campbell, CA 9500820 Alice Ave.

DATEDRAWNSCALE: AS SHOWNJOB NO.CKE NO.SHEET NO.

REVISIONS

DRAWING TITLE

12.b
Packet Pg. 300
Attachment: Project Plans (PLN-2023-127 20 Alice Avenue) DESIGN BOARD1
SCALE 1/2" = 1'-0"
Campbell, CA 95008
20 Alice Ave.

DATE
DRAWN
SCALE: AS SHOWN
JOB NO.

CKE NO.

SHEET NO.

REVISIONS

DRAWING TITLE

23.303.A
TU
030123
Taeho Um &
Associates
Structural Engineers
1 T. 650.208.5251
[email protected]
34781 Maple St. Ste K.

Fremont, CA 94536
2 BABB

RESIDENCE ADU
TU

PLAN CHECK COMMENTS
5-30-2023
PLANNING DEPT. COMMENTS
8-11-2023

DESIGN BOARD
A5.0

12.b
Packet Pg. 301
Attachment: Project Plans (PLN-2023-127 20 Alice Avenue) Tree Protection Plan
20 Alice Avenue, Campbell
Sheet T1
of one sheet
K.F.
2/7/2023
APN: 412-
040-52
Base map from Sheet BT 1, dated 10/19/2022, Preliminary Boundary & Topographic Survey - Concept Site Plan
Additional Tree Protection Information can be found in
Appendix F of arborist report dated 2/7/2023.

T1 WALNUT
34"
--------->> >>>>>>>>>

12.b
Packet Pg. 302
Attachment: Project Plans (PLN-2023-127 20 Alice Avenue)

DPR 523A (1/95) *Required information

Page 1 of 2 ends

P1. Other Identifier: Campbell Historic District Property *P2. Location:  Not for Publication  Unrestricted *a. County Santa Clara and (P2c, P2e, and P2b or P2d. Attach a Location Map as necessary.)
*b. USGS 7.5 ' Quad Date T; R ; ¼ of ¼ of Sec ; B.M.
c. Address 20 Alice Ave. City Campbell Zip 95008 d. UTM: (Give more than one for large and/or linear resources) Zone , mE/ mN e. Other Locational Data: (e.g., parcel #, directions to resource, elevation, etc., as appropriate) APN: 412-04-052

*P3a. Description: (Describe resource and its major elements. Include design, materials, condition, alterations, size, setting, and boundaries)

Historic Single-Family Residence. This channel rustic clad Vernacular residence has a rectangular floor plan. Covered with composition shingles, the hipped roof has a small gabled awning. The eaves are overhanging with exposed rafter tails. The façade includes a detail within the front gable of vertical scalloped boards. The partial porch is recessed and its shed roof is supported by square posts. There is a continuation of the scalloped detail on the frieze of the porch. The side and one front window are all one-over-one double-hung, while the front gable has new vinyl- clad fixed window. The building is intact and in good condition with a detached single garage and light landscaping.

*P3b. Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) 02- Single Family Residence *P4. Resources Present:  Building Structure Object Site District Element of District Other (Isolates, etc.)

P5b. Description of Photo: (view,
date, accession #) Front
Façade, 07/09/07

*P6. Date Constructed/Age and
Source:  Historic
 Prehistoric
 Both
1939

*P7. Owner and Address:

Scott Brooks, Et Al

*P8. Recorded by: (Name,
affiliation, and address)
G. Laffey, Archives &
Architecture
3553 Surber Dr.

San Jose, CA 95130

*P9. Date Recorded: September
1998
*P10. Survey Type: (Describe)
Inventory Update

*P11. Report Citation: (Cit
e
survey report and other
sources, or enter "none.")
Phone interview, Martin C.

Shadle, owner (February 13, 1978) by Tom M. King. Initial notes taken by Tom M. King (October 22, 1977)

*Attachments: NONE Location Map Continuation Sheet  Building, Structure, and Object Record Archaeological Record District Record Linear Feature Record Milling Station Record Rock Art Record
State of California — The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI #
PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial
NRHP Status Code
Other Listings
Review Code Reviewer Date
P5a. Photograph or Drawing (Photograph required for
buildings, structures, and objects.)

12.c
Packet Pg. 303
Attachment: DPR Form (PLN-2023-127 20 Alice Avenue)

DPR 523A (1/95) *Required information
Artifact Record Photograph Record  Other (List):

12.c
Packet Pg. 304
Attachment: DPR Form (PLN-2023-127 20 Alice Avenue)

DPR 523A (1/95) *Required information

*NRHP Status Code

Page 2 of 2 ends

B1. Historic Name: Mary Fablinger House
B2. Common Name: Mary Fablinger House

B3. Original Use: Single-Family Home B4. Present Use: Same *B5. Architectural Style:
*B6. Construction History: (Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations)

Built, 1939.

*B7. Moved?  No Yes Unknown Date: Original Location:
*B8. Related Features: Garage

B9a. Architect: Samuel E. Barth, not an Architect b. Builder: Joseph Astrita *B10. Significance: Theme Area

Period of Significance Property Type Applicable Criteria
(Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period, and geographic scope. Also address integrity.)

Alice Avenue was created in 1915 on a portion of the site of the fruit drying yards owned by the George E. Hyde Company, a canning and fruit dehydrating plant occupying 17 acres in Campbell. The land was originally owned and utilized by Flamming’s Fruit Dryer (1887); sold to Frank Buxton’s Dryer (1890, and again sold to Campbell Fruit Grower’s Union (1892) which owned and controlled the drying yards and packing house until its sale to George Hyde in 1909. The residential subdivision, “Hyde Residential Park” was built primarily for housing cannery workers, though George and Alice Hyde (the Street’s namesake) resided there too.

House built for Mary Fablinger, Campbell Grammar School teacher. John Brown’s son-in-law, who we called “Grandpa” Fablinger, was a Custodian for Campbell High School (1947- September 31, 1976). Martin C. Schadle worked for Navy as aircraft Inspector. Then service station for 28 years. Mary Fablinger was 6
th or 7th grade teacher of Mr. Martin C. Schadle. Parents of Martin C. Schadle bought the house and he has lived there since 1947.

B11. Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes)

*B12. References:

See P11

B13. Remarks:

*B14. Evaluator: See P8
*Date of Evaluation: See P9

State of California — The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI# BUILDING,

STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
(This space reserved for official comments.)

12.c
Packet Pg. 305
Attachment: DPR Form (PLN-2023-127 20 Alice Avenue)

12.d
Packet Pg. 306
Attachment: Historic Analysis (PLN-2023-127 20 Alice Avenue)

12.d
Packet Pg. 307
Attachment: Historic Analysis (PLN-2023-127 20 Alice Avenue)

12.d
Packet Pg. 308
Attachment: Historic Analysis (PLN-2023-127 20 Alice Avenue)

12.d
Packet Pg. 309
Attachment: Historic Analysis (PLN-2023-127 20 Alice Avenue)

12.d
Packet Pg. 310
Attachment: Historic Analysis (PLN-2023-127 20 Alice Avenue)

12.d
Packet Pg. 311
Attachment: Historic Analysis (PLN-2023-127 20 Alice Avenue)

12.d
Packet Pg. 312
Attachment: Historic Analysis (PLN-2023-127 20 Alice Avenue)

12.d
Packet Pg. 313
Attachment: Historic Analysis (PLN-2023-127 20 Alice Avenue)

12.d
Packet Pg. 314
Attachment: Historic Analysis (PLN-2023-127 20 Alice Avenue)

12.d
Packet Pg. 315
Attachment: Historic Analysis (PLN-2023-127 20 Alice Avenue)

12.d
Packet Pg. 316
Attachment: Historic Analysis (PLN-2023-127 20 Alice Avenue)

12.d
Packet Pg. 317
Attachment: Historic Analysis (PLN-2023-127 20 Alice Avenue)

12.d
Packet Pg. 318
Attachment: Historic Analysis (PLN-2023-127 20 Alice Avenue)

12.d
Packet Pg. 319
Attachment: Historic Analysis (PLN-2023-127 20 Alice Avenue)

12.d
Packet Pg. 320
Attachment: Historic Analysis (PLN-2023-127 20 Alice Avenue)

12.d
Packet Pg. 321
Attachment: Historic Analysis (PLN-2023-127 20 Alice Avenue)

12.d
Packet Pg. 322
Attachment: Historic Analysis (PLN-2023-127 20 Alice Avenue)

12.d
Packet Pg. 323
Attachment: Historic Analysis (PLN-2023-127 20 Alice Avenue)

12.d
Packet Pg. 324
Attachment: Historic Analysis (PLN-2023-127 20 Alice Avenue)

12.d
Packet Pg. 325
Attachment: Historic Analysis (PLN-2023-127 20 Alice Avenue)

12.d
Packet Pg. 326
Attachment: Historic Analysis (PLN-2023-127 20 Alice Avenue)

12.d
Packet Pg. 327
Attachment: Historic Analysis (PLN-2023-127 20 Alice Avenue)

12.d
Packet Pg. 328
Attachment: Historic Analysis (PLN-2023-127 20 Alice Avenue)

12.d
Packet Pg. 329
Attachment: Historic Analysis (PLN-2023-127 20 Alice Avenue)

12.d
Packet Pg. 330
Attachment: Historic Analysis (PLN-2023-127 20 Alice Avenue)

12.d
Packet Pg. 331
Attachment: Historic Analysis (PLN-2023-127 20 Alice Avenue)

12.d
Packet Pg. 332
Attachment: Historic Analysis (PLN-2023-127 20 Alice Avenue)

12.d
Packet Pg. 333
Attachment: Historic Analysis (PLN-2023-127 20 Alice Avenue)

12.d
Packet Pg. 334
Attachment: Historic Analysis (PLN-2023-127 20 Alice Avenue)

City
Council
Report

TITLE: Public Hearing to Consider the Request of Sachneel Patel on Behalf of 44 Sunnyside LLC for a 6 -Lot Detached Single -Family Residential Subdivision, and Removal of Two 'Protected' Trees, on Property Located at 44 and 56 Sunnyside Avenue. the Applications Under Consideration Include a Planned Development Permit, Tentative Subdivision Map, and Tree Removal Permit, Submitted Under an SB - 330 Preliminary Application Filed in Compliance with Government Code § 65941.1. File No.: PLN -2023-135. (Ordinance/Resolution/Roll Call Vote)

RECOMMENDED ACTION

The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council take the following actions:
(1) Introduce an ordinance approving a Planned Development Permit) and (2) Adopt a resolution approving a Tentative Vesting Subdivision Map and a Tree Removal Permit.

ENVIRONMENTAL (CEQA) DETERMINATION
The Planning Commission recommend to the City Council determine that this project is Categorically Exempt from environmental review under Section 15332 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), pertaining to In -Fill Development Projects which are found consistent with all applicable general plan policies and zoning regulations, are under five acres in size, and substantially surrounded by urban uses. This recommendation includes an acknowledgement that the project site does not contain a "historical resource" as determined by Section 15300.2(f) of the CEQA Guidelines, discussed, below.

The project site includes a single-family residence, located on the 44 Sunnyside Avenue parcel, that was constructed circa 1900. Due to the age of this structure and its placement on the City's list of potentially historic properties , demolition of the building could be considered a "significant impact" under the CEQA. To address this possibility, the applicant procured a historical assessment prepared by a professional historical consultant (reference Attachment C). These materials were peer-reviewed by the City’s Historical Architectural Advisor, who concurred with the determination that the property does not meet any of the minimum threshold eligibility requirements needed to be listed on the California Register of Historic Resources or as a local historic resource by the City as either a Structure of Merit or a Landmark property (reference Attachment D – Peer Review Memo). As such, its demolition would not constitute a "significant impact" under CEQA. The project, therefore, remains eligible for an infill exemption.

Item: 13
Category: REGULAR MEETING OF THE

CAMPBELL CITY COUNCIL
Meeting Date: January 22, 2024
13 Packet Pg. 335
PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue Page 2 of 11
PROJECT DATA1
Zoning Designation: P-D (Planned Development)
General Plan Designation: Low-Medium Density Residential (6-13 units/gr. acre) Net Lot Area (Pre-Dedication): 17,418 square-feet
Net Lot Area (Post-Dedication): 16,818 square-feet
Gross Lot Area: 20,418 square-feet (0.468 acres)
Proposed Density: 12.8 units/gr. acre 13 units/gr. acre (Max.

Allowed)
Building Height: 35-ft (approximate) 75 ft- (City-wide max.) Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 1.22
Building (Lot) Coverage: 59%
Building Floor Area (x6):

Living Area: 3,002 square-feet
Garage: 427 square-feet
3,429 square-feet (per unit)
x 6 units
20,574 square-feet (total building area)
Parking: 12 covered stalls
Building Setbacks2: Proposed Minimum Required
Front (Sunnyside Ave.): 2 feet (to porch line) N/A
Side (west): 10 feet N/A
Side (east): 10 feet N/A
Rear (south): 5 feet (at rear ally) N/A

DISCUSSION
The applicant is requesting a p ermit to allow construction of six "small -lot single-family" residential homes with an option for integrated accessory dwelling units (ADUs), a Tentative Subdivision Map to allow a new residential subdivision inclusive of six private lots and one common lot, and a Tree Removal Permit to allow removal of two "protected" White Mulberry trees (reference Attachment E – Project Plans).

Project Site: The project site is an approximately 17,418 square-foot assemblage of two residential properties located along Sunnyside Avenue, east of Winchester Boulevard.

The site is currently developed with two single -family residences that would be demolished with the project. Detached single -family homes border the site to the east and south, and a restaurant is located to the west:

1 Reflects standards applicable to the property as they existed at time of pre -application submittal (see, below).
2 As measured from exterior property lines of the development perimeter, not the interior setbacks of each new lot. 13 Packet Pg. 336
PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue Page 3 of 11
Scope of Review: As a 100% residential project with six units, the planned development subdivision constitutes a "housing development project" under State law, which limits the City's review pursuant to the Housing Crisis Act and the Housing Accountability Act:
◼ Housing Crisis Act: Originally adopted as SB-330 in 2019 and amended by SB-8 in 2021, the Housing Crisis Act is a broad law that contains various components, among which is a vesting pre -application process. This particular provision, in association with related changes to the Permit Streamlining Act, allows a developer to submit preliminary plans to the City that vest ("lock -in") zoning code standards, General Plan policies, and building/fire codes that are in effect at the time of submittal. This project is governed by a preliminary application submitted on March 3, 2023, which predates the June 2, 2023, implementation date of the new General Plan, revised Zoning Code, and Multi -Family Development and Design Standards (MFDDS). As such, it must be considered under the prior General Plan and Zoning Code, and without review under the MFDDS. 3 The Planning Commission reviewed the pre-application materials in a study session held on April 25, 2023.

In addition to the preliminary application protections, the Housing Crisis Act also includes provisions pertaining to the demolition of existing housing units.

Specifically, new housing projects must "include at least as many residential dwelling units" as are being demolished (e.g., a fourplex cannot be demolished to construct two single -family homes). Additionally, any "protected units" —housing currently, or in the past five years, occupied by a lower -income household —proposed to be demolished must be replaced in -kind with new deed -restricted affordable units. In compliance with this requirements, the application materials included a signed City certification form affirming under penalty of perjury that neither of the existing residences qualify as a "protected unit".
3 The development of this property today would also allow for six dwelling units. However, under the MFDDS, the project would have taken the form of an apartment building ("multiplex small") or townhomes. 13 Packet Pg. 337
PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue Page 4 of 11
◼ Housing Accountability Act: The Housing Accountability Act (HAA) limits the City's ability to "deny, reduce the density for, or render infeasible" the project unless: 1) the proposal is found to be in violation of an objective general plan/zoning standard (other than those waived/reduced through use of the Density Bonus law); or 2) the project will result in a specific adverse impact to public health and safety. While changes to the project may be applied by the decision -making body to further applicable goals, policies, and strategies – any changes not based on objective standards may not make the project infeasible or reduce the number of units. For example, the decision-making body may not deny a project because of its proposed paint color, but still retains the authority to condition such a change, provided the change is rooted in a finding or a policy.

Additionally, as noted, the project site is zoned P -D (Planned Development), which has no development standards, such as setbacks, floor area ratio, lot coverage, etc.

In the past, the City relied on the discretionary review process to determine the appropriateness of such standards on a case -by-case basis, which is no longer permissible under the HAA. As such, the ability to deny or modify the project for non- compliance with objective standards is limited.

Administrative Procedure: The former Zoning Code provisions governing development in the Planned Development Zoning District required that projects that exceed certain thresholds be approved by ordinance, including those that "consists of the construction of more than twenty thousand square feet of gross floor area" ( former CMC Sec.

21.12.030.H.10.c.(2)). As the proposed six single -family homes would result in construction of 20,574 square-feet of gross floor area, the Planned Development Permit must be approved by ordinance. However, the associated Tentative Subdivision Map and Tree Removal Permit may be approved by resolution.

Planning Commission Action : The Planning Commission held a public hearing on this application at its meeting of December 12, 2023, and recommended approval on a 5 -0- 2 vote (reference Attachment F – Meeting Minutes) . Understanding the limitations under State law, the Commission's deliberation was brief. The only notable area of discussion was the proposed 2 -ft front-yard setbacks, as measured to the front porches to the new Sunnyside Avenue property line. As depicted, below, the Public Works Department is recommending construction of a landscaped park strip along the street frontage in a "detached sidewalk" configuration, which would be replicated on the adjacent commercial property (Coach's Sports Bar & Grill) should it be developed in the future. However, the new park strip would require 5-feet of additional public right-of-way, which will have the effect of shifting the property line inward, resulting in a reduced front-yard setback (2 feet).
13 Packet Pg. 338
PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue Page 5 of 11
If the Council would prefer the project to incorporate deeper front -yard setbacks (7-feet instead of 2 -feet), it could approve the project with a revised condition eliminating the park strip requirement ( maintaining the sidewalk in its current location ) and securing a 5-foot easement in-lieu of the right-of-way dedication.

The Planning Commission did not recommend this alternative approach and i t should be noted, however, that future projects will need to incorporate park strips for stormwater treatment in compliance with the new "C.3" standards, which require new development to treat off -site impervious areas (e.g., reconstructed sidewalks and streets) within the right -of-way. Public Works Engineering Division staff will be in attendance at the Council meeting to discuss this matter, should the Council have questions.

ANALYSIS
Consideration in Review of Applications : In review of a Planned Development Permit, the Zoning Code (former CMC Sec. 21.12.030.H.5) directs the decision -making body to consider certain design and layout aspects of the proposal prior to rendering a decision, referenced to as "considerations". The following identifies these considerations and application consistency.

A. Considerations relating to structure and site layout: The site plan, below, depicts a private roadway/drive -aisle connecting from Sunnyside Avenue into the development, which would provide vehicular access to each unit's garage. The roadway is 27-feet wide, exceeding the minimum 26-foot dimensions for County Fire District emergency vehicle aerial access, as well as for garbage trucks. There is no proposed pedestrian access (i.e., sidewalks) through the community. 13 Packet Pg. 339
PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue Page 6 of 11
B. Considerations relating to site circulation, traffic congestion, and traffic safety:

The proposed project will not have a discernible impact upon traffic congestion given that it would result in a net increase of only four units. For the same reason, the project also does not present any potential circulation or traffic safety concerns. With respect to parking, the site is within the AB -2097 area exempting it from the City's parking requirements. However, each unit will be provided with a 2 -car garage, for a total of 12 stalls. The City's parking requirement for a "small-lot single- family" project would have otherwise required 3 spaces per unit (2 ½ spaces + ½ space guest), for a total of 18 stalls.

C. Considerations relating to landscaping: The P -D Zoning District did not have a landscaping requirement, as this was an element of project review that would typically have been evaluated on a case -case basis. However, the project will include landscaping treatment of the front and rear yards of the project.

Design Guidelines: The former Zoning Code also directed the decision -making body to "take into consideration any relevant design guidelines that have been adopted by the City" (former CMC Sec. 21.12.030.E). However, no design standards are applicable to the project. Nonetheless, the proposed homes are shown in a contemporary aesthetic, with a mixture of vertical and horizontal siding, predominantly in a light grey tone, 13 Packet Pg. 340
PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue Page 7 of 11
accented with darker grey and black trim. The buildings exhibit sharp lines, and a combination of gabled, hipped, and shed roof forms. The roof is finished with dark composite shingles, complementing the overall color scheme. Each unit features a combination of large and small windows. The entrance to each home is marked by a covered porch area, with the doors accented by overhead lighting. And notably, the units facing Sunnyside Avenue would be oriented towards the public street.

In regard to massing, each home is three stories tall, approximately 36 -feet in height.

While the front elevations have off -set building planes to minimize the perceived massing and scale, the side elevations have less articulation.

Findings for Approval : To grant a land use approval, the decision -making body must affirmatively establish that the project meets codified findings for approval. Findings establish the evidentiary basis for a City's decision to grant or deny a land use approval and to impose conditions of approval as necessary to establish the findings. The applicable findings depend upon the type of land use approval under review. The following analysis identifies each of the applicable findings in italics and how the proposed project satisfies them.

Planned Development Permit Findings
A. The proposed development or uses clearly would result in a more desirable environment and use of land than would be possible under any other zoning district classification.

Not Applicable. Since the project site is already zoned P -D (Planned Development) the applicant is compelled to build under the provisions of this zoning district, such that this finding is not directly applicable.

B. The proposed development would be compatible with the general plan and will aid in the harmonious development of the immediate area.

Yes. The General Plan land use designation for the project site at the time of preliminary application submittal was Low-Medium Density Residential (6 -13 13 Packet Pg. 341
PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue Page 8 of 11
units/gr. acre). Based on the property's 0.468 acres gross lot area4, a 6 -unit project results in a density of 12.8 units/gr. acre, consistent with the range. The General Plan also indicates that "developments at this density consist generally of duplexes, small apartment buildings, and small lot single -family detached homes…" The proposed project would, therefore, be in keeping with anticipated development intensity of this designation.

Lastly, the proposed project may also be found consistent with the following General Plan policies and strategies. These policies reference the need to protect the integrity of established neighborhoods, quality site planning and design, and production of needed housing:

Policy LUT-5.2: Residential Neighborhoods : Maintain safe, attractive, pedestrian friendly residential neighborhoods with identifiable centers and consistent development patterns and a range of public and private services.

Strategy LUT-5.2a: Neighborhood Compatibility : Promote new residential development and substantial additions that are designed to maintain and support the existing character and development pattern of the surrounding neighborhood, especially in historic neighborhoods and neighborhoods with consistent design
characteristics.

Policy LUT-9.3: Design and Planning Compatibility : Promote high quality, creative design and site planning that is compatible with surrounding development, public spaces and natural resources.

Strategy LUT-9.3e: Building Materials : Encourage the use of long -lasting, high quality building materials on all buildings to ensure the long -term quality of the built environment.

C. The proposed development will not result in allowing more residential units than would be allowed by other residential zoning districts which are consistent with the general plan.

Not Applicable. This finding is not consistent with the Housing Accountability Act — Gov. Code § 65589.5(j)(4) —which indicates that in cases where the general plan and zoning ordinance do not match, a project is only required to comply with the general plan. The comparable zoning district for the property based on its General Plan designation is the former R -M (Multiple -family) Zoning District, which would have only allowed five units to be constructed based on the net lot area. However, under the General Plan, as discussed above, the gross lot area allows for creation of six units.
4 Under the prior General Plan and Zoning Code, "gross lot area" included both the titled property plus the public right-of-way to the centerline of adjacent streets.
13 Packet Pg. 342
PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue Page 9 of 11
D. The proposed development would not be detrimental to the health, safety or welfare of the neighborhood or of the city as a whole.

Yes. The development of a six -lot subdivision will not result in any public health impacts in that the residential use would not result in the release or distribution of any hazardous substances, emissions, or waste.

Subdivision Findings
The following findings are required pursuant to Sections 66473.1, 66474.60, .61 and .63 of the California Government Code (the Subdivision Map Act):

A. That the proposed map is consistent with applicable general and specific plans; Yes, as discussed in Planned Development Permit Finding 'B,' above.

B. That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with applicable general and specific plans;
Yes. The General Plan does not provide any specific guidance as to the design and/or improvements of a new subdivision, other than requiring conformance with the City's Subdivision Code and the Subdivision Map Act. The City's Subdivision Code (CMC Section 20.16.035) regulates subdivisions that include the creation of lots which do not have frontage on a public street (i.e. those that take access from a private street). This section requires that the subdivision be approved with Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Homeowners Association (HOA), for the joint maintenance of common property. As conditioned, the project would comply with this requirement.

C. That the site is physically suitable for the type of development; Yes. The project site is relatively flat, requiring minimal grading to accommodate the proposed subdivision and can be adequately served by all required utilities necessary for residential use of the property.

D. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development; Yes. The project site can physically accommodate the proposed 6 -lot subdivision, in that new residences would include adequate living area and recreational open space.

E. That the design of the subdivision or the propose improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat;
Yes. The site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare, or threatened species (i.e., wetland), the project will not result in any significant effects related to traffic, noise, or air/water quality, as conditioned.
13 Packet Pg. 343
PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue Page 10 of 11
F. The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not cause serious public health problems; and
Yes. The proposed subdivision will not result in any public health impacts in that the residential use would not result in the release or distribution of any hazardous substances, emissions, or waste.

G. The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision or that alternative easements for access will be provided, and that these will be substantially equivalent to ones previously acquired by the public.

Yes. As conditions of approval, the City shall secure all easements and land dedications necessary to serve the property. There are no existing easements that would create a conflict.

Tree Removal Permit Finding(s)
The City’s Tree Protection Regulations (CMC 21.32) provide five findings for consideration when reviewing a Tree Removal Permit. The permit may be granted when one or more one of the findings are satisfied. In consideration of the project, the following finding may be satisfied:

5. Economic enjoyment and hardship. The retention of the tree(s) restricts the economic enjoyment of the property or creates an unusual hardship for the property owner by severely limiting the use of the property in a manner not typically experienced by owners of similarly zoned and situated properties, and the applicant has demonstrated to the satisfaction of the approval authority that there are no reasonable alternatives to preserve the tree(s). A minor reduction of the potential number of residential units or building size due to the tree location does not represent a severe limit of the economic enjoyment of the property.

Yes. The project will include the removal of multiple trees on the property, most of which are too small to be considered "protected," except for two White Mulberry trees, which are located in the way of the new drive-aisle such that their preservation would render the project infeasible. Moreover, these trees were also found to be in poor condition per the project's Arborist Report (reference Attachment G). However, at staff's urging two mature and healthy redwood trees would be preserved in the rear yards of parcels 1 and 2.

PUBLIC COMMENT
No public comment has been received.

FISCAL IMPACT
13 Packet Pg. 344
PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue Page 11 of 11
In addition to the entitlement application fees already paid, and permits fees required for building permit and off -site improvement review, the developer will contribute approximately $120,000 in parkland fees.

ALTERNATIVE
If the Council wishes to approve the project without the recommended landscaped park strip, the motion to adopt a resolution approving the tentative subdivision map may reference the revised Public Works Department Conditions of Approval provided in Attachment H.

Prepared by:

Daniel Fama, Senior Planner
Reviewed by:

Rob Eastwood, Community
Development Director
Approved by:

Brian Loventhal, City Manager
Attachment:
a. CC Ordinance (PD Permit)
b. CC Resolution (T-Map, TRP)
c. Historical Assessment
d. Peer Review Memo
e. Project Plans
f. PC Meeting Minutes (2023-12-12)
g. Arborist Report
h. Alternative DPW Conditions of Approval
13 Packet Pg. 345

ORDINANCE NO. ____

BEING AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

CAMPBELL APPROVING A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT TO
ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF SIX (6) DETACHED SMALL -LOT

SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLINGS IN ASSOCIATION WITH A
RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 44 AND
56 SUNNYSIDE AVENUE. FILE NO.: PLN-2023-135

After notification and public hearing, as specified by law and after presentation by the Community Development Director, proponents and opponents, the hearing was closed.

After due consideration of all evidence presented, the City Council of the City of Campbell does ordain as follows:

1. The Proposed Project is an application for a Planned Development Permit to allow construction of six "small -lot single-family" residential homes with an option for integrated accessory dwelling units (ADUs) in association with a Tentative Subdivision Map to allow a new residential subdivision inclusive of six private lots and one common lot, and a Tree Removal Permit to allow removal of two "protected" White Mulberry trees.

2. The Project Site is an assemblage of two residential properties located along Sunnyside Avenue, east of Winchester Boulevard, with "net" and "gross" lot areas of approximately 17,418 square-feet and 20,418 square-feet (0.468 acres), respectively.

3. The Proposed Project was submitted under an SB -330 preliminary application filed in compliance with Government Code § 65941.1 on March 3, 2023, predating the June 2, 2023, implementation date of the new General Plan, revised Zoning Code, and Multi -Family Development and Design Standards (MFDDS).

4. Due to the aforementioned preliminary application, the application is not subject to any objective design standards nor any zoning district specific development standards.

5. The Project Site was designated at the time of pre -application submittal as Low-Medium Density Residential (6-13 units/gr. acre) and zoned P-D (Planned Development), as shown on the former Campbell General Plan and Zoning Maps, respectively.

6. The Project Site is currently developed with two single -family residences that will be demolished as part of the project.

7. The single-family residence located on the 44 Sunnyside Avenue parcel was constructed circa 1900. Due to the age of this structure and its placement on the City's list of potentially historic properties, demolition of the building could be considered a "significant impact" under the CEQA. To address this possibility, the applicant procured a historical assessment prepared by a professional historical consultant. These materials were peer-reviewed by the City’s Historical Architectural Advisor, who concurred with the determination that the property does not meet any of the minimum threshold eligibility requirements needed to be listed on the California Register of Historic Resources or as a local historic resource by the City as either a Structure of Merit or a Landmark property. As such, its demolition would not constitute a "significant impact" under CEQA.

13.a
Packet Pg. 346
Attachment: CC Ordinance (PD Permit) (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue) City Council Ordinance – Planned Development Permit Page 2 of 4 44 and 56 Sunnyside Avenue

8. The Proposed Project's six units would result in a density of 12.8 units/gr. acre (6 units ÷

0.468 gross acres), consistent with the density range of the applicable Medium Density Residential (14-20 units/gr. acre) designation. Although six units exceeds the allowable five units otherwise specified by former CMC Sec. 21.08.050.E., Table 2 -6 (General Development Standards – R-M Zoning District), pursuant to California Government Code § 65589.5, in cases where the general plan and zoning ordinance do not matc h, a project is only required to comply with the general plan.

9. The Proposed Project includes provision for interior accessory dwelling units, fulfilling the City's accessory dwelling unit (ADU) "Development Policy" (CMC Section 21.23.090) that requires twenty percent (20%) percent of new dwellings within a residential subdivision with five or more parcels to be designed to allow for future creation of an accessory dwelling unit, or alternatively, include an accessory dwelling unit.

10. Accessory dwelling units are not considered dwelling units for purposes of residential density or the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance pursuant to former CMC Section 21.04.020, Table 2- 1, Note (1), and Section 21.24.030 – Definition of "Residential Project," respectively.

11. The proposed Planned Development Permit would be adopted by City Council ordinance as also required by former CMC Section 21.12.030.H.10.c(1), because the project consists of the construction of more than twenty thousand square feet of gross floor area.

12. The Proposed Project is not subject to the provisions CMC Chapter 21.24 (Inclusionary Housing Ordinance) in that it has fewer than 10 housing units.

13. The Proposed Project is a "housing development project" under State law, which limits the City in its capability to "deny, reduce the density for, or render infeasible" the project under the Housing Accountability Act (HAA) (Government Code Section 65589. 5) unless: 1) the proposal is found to be in violation of an objective general plan/zoning standard (other than those waived/reduced through use of the Density Bonus law); or 2) the project will result in a specific adverse impact to public health and safety.

14. The Proposed Project would be consistent with the following General Plan policies and strategies:

Policy LUT-5.2: Residential Neighborhoods: Maintain safe, attractive, pedestrian friendly residential neighborhoods with identifiable centers and consistent development patterns and a range of public and private services.

Strategy LUT-5.2a: Neighborhood Compatibility: Promote new residential development and substantial additions that are designed to maintain and support the existing character and development pattern of the surrounding neighborhood, especially in historic neighborhoods and neighborhoods with consistent design characteristics.

Policy LUT-9.3: Design and Planning Compatibility: Promote high quality, creative design and site planning that is compatible with surrounding development, public spaces and natural resources.

Strategy LUT-9.3e: Building Materials: Encourage the use of long-lasting, high quality building materials on all buildings to ensure the long-term quality of the built environment.

13.a
Packet Pg. 347
Attachment: CC Ordinance (PD Permit) (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue) City Council Ordinance – Planned Development Permit Page 3 of 4 44 and 56 Sunnyside Avenue

15. In review of the proposed project, the City Council considered the site circulation, traffic congestion, and traffic safety effects of the project, including the effect of the site development plan on traffic conditions on abutting streets; the layout of the site with respect to locations and dimensions of vehicular and pedestrian entrances, exit driveways, and walkways; the arrangement and adequacy of off -street parking facilities to prevent traffic congestion; the location, arrangement, and dimensions of truck loading and unloading facilities; the circulation patterns within the boundaries of the development, and; the surfacing and lighting of the off-street parking facilities.

16. The City Council further considered the landscaping design of the proposed project, including the location, height, and material of fences, walls, hedges, and screen plantings to ensure harmony with adjacent development or to conceal storage areas, utility installations, and other unsightly aspects of the development; the planting of groundcover or other surfacing to prevent dust and erosion, and the preservation of existing healthy trees.

17. The City Council further considered the proposed project's architectural and site layout, including the general silhouette and mass, including location on the site, elevations, and relation to natural plant coverage, all in relationship to the surrounding neighborhood; th e exterior design in relation to adjoining structures in terms of area, bulk, height, openings, and breaks in the facade facing the street; and appropriateness and compatibility of the proposed uses in relation to the adjacent uses and the area as a whole.

18. No substantial evidence has been presented which shows that the project, as currently presented and subject to the required conditions of approval, will have a significant adverse impact on the environment.

19. There is a reasonable relationship and a rough proportionality between the Conditions of Approval and the impacts of the project.

20. There is a reasonable relationship between the use of the fees imposed upon the project and the type of development project.

Based upon the foregoing findings of fact and in consideration of the entire administrative record, the City Council further finds and concludes that:

Planned Development Permit Findings (CMC Sec. 21.12.030.H.6):

1. The proposed development will clearly result in a more desirable environment and use of the land than would be possible under any other zoning district classification;

2. The proposed development will be compatible with the General Plan of the City and will aid in the harmonious development of the immediate area;

3. The proposed development will not result in allowing more residential units than would be allowed by other residential zoning districts, which are consistent with the General Plan designation of the property;

4. The proposed development will not be detrimental to the health, safety or welfare of the neighborhood or the City as a whole;

13.a
Packet Pg. 348
Attachment: CC Ordinance (PD Permit) (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue) City Council Ordinance – Planned Development Permit Page 4 of 4 44 and 56 Sunnyside Avenue

5. There is a reasonable relationship and a rough proportionality between the Conditions of Approval and the impacts of the project;

6. There is a reasonable relationship between the use of the fees imposed upon the project and the type of development project;

7. No substantial evidence has been presented from which a reasonable argument could be made that shows that the project, as currently presented and subject to the required conditions of approval, will have a significant adverse impact on the environment; Environmental Findings (CMC Sec. 21.38.050):

8. This project is Categorically Exempt under Section 15332 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), pertaining to In-Fill Development Projects which are found consistent with all applicable general plan policies and zoning regulations, are under five acres in size, and substantially surrounded by urban uses; and

9. There are no unusual circumstances that would prevent the project from qualifying as Categorically Exempt per Section 15300.2 of the CEQA Guidelines, including specifically that the subject property does not contain an "historical resource" under CEQA.

SECTION ONE: That this Ordinance be adopted to approve a Planned Development Permit (PLN2018-156) to allow construction of six (6) detached small -lot single -family dwellings in association with a residential subdivision, for property located at 44 and 56 Sunnyside Avenue, subject to the attached Conditions of Approval (attached Exhibit A).

SECTION TWO: This Ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days following its passage and adoption and shall be published, one time within fifteen (15) days upon passage and adoption in the Metro Silicon Valley, a newspaper of general circulation in the City of Campbell, County of Santa Clara.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this _______ day of ________________, 2024, by the following roll call vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:

APPROVED:

Susan M. Landry, Mayor
ATTEST:

Andrea Sanders, City Clerk

13.a
Packet Pg. 349
Attachment: CC Ordinance (PD Permit) (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue)

EXHIBIT A

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Planned Development Permit
Where approval by the Director of Community Development, City Engineer, Public Works Director, City Attorney or Fire Department is required, that review shall be for compliance with all applicable conditions of approval, adopted policies and guidelines, or dinances, laws and regulations and accepted engineering practices for the item under review. Additionally, the applicant is hereby notified that he/she is required to comply with all applicable Codes or Ordinances of the City of Campbell and the State of California that pertain to this development and are not herein specified.

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Planning Division

1. Approved Project : Approval is granted for Planned Development Permit to allow the construction of six (6) detached single-family dwellings, in association with a new residential subdivision, on property located at 44 and 56 Sunnyside Avenue . The Approved Project shall substantially conform to the Approved Project Plans included as Attachment E in the January 22, 2024, City Council Staff Report, except as may be modified by conditions of approval contained herein.

2. Permit Expiration: Approval of the Planned Development Permit shall be valid for two (2) years from the effective date of this City Council Ordinance. Within this two -year period a Building Permit for the project must be issued pursuant to CMC Sec. 21.56.030.B.1. Failure to meet this deadline or expiration of an issued Building Permit shall result in the Approval being rendered void.

3. Tract Map: Exercise of this Planned Development Permit is contingent upon recordation of the Tract Map associated with the Tentative Subdivision Map approved by separate action.

The Tract Map shall be recorded prior to the issuance of building or grading permits.

However, the Tract Map may not be recorded if the Planned Development Permit expires or is otherwise rendered void.

4. Planning Final Required: Planning Division clearance is required prior to Building Permit final.

Construction not in substantial compliance with the Approved Project Plans shall not be approved without prior authorization.

5. Minor Revisions: Architectural refinements and other minor revisions to the Approved Project Plans, may be administratively approved by the Community Development Director pursuant to CMC Sec. 21.56.060.

6. ADU Ready : In compliance with CMC Sec. 21.23.090, at least one of the single -family dwellings shall be made "ADU ready" meaning pre-installation of electrical, domestic water, and sanitation utilities necessary to accommodate a future bathroom and kitchen to serve an ADU or alternatively include creation of the ADU.

7. Deed Restriction: The applicant shall record deed restrictions on the parcels containing accessory dwelling units consistent with CMC Section 21.23.070 prior to the issuance of building permits.

13.a
Packet Pg. 350
Attachment: CC Ordinance (PD Permit) (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue) Conditions of Approval – Planned Development Permit Page 2 44 and 56 Sunnyside Avenue

8. On-Site Lighting : On -site lighting shall be shielded away from adjacent properties and directed on site in compliance with City of Campbell Lighting Design Standards (CMC

21.18.090).

9. Utility Boxes and Back-Flow Preventers: The applicant shall submit a plan prior to installation of the underground PG&E utility (transformer) boxes and San Jose Water Company back - flow preventers, indicating the location of the boxes for approval by the Community Development Director. Any transformers shall be screened with landscaping and/or artistically painted.

10. Fences/Walls: Any newly proposed fencing and/or walls shall comply with CMC Section

21.18.060.

11. Tree Protection Plan: The tree protection measures identified by the "44 & 56 Sunnyside Ave Arborist Report 2023" are herein incorporated by reference and shall be implemented prior to issuance of building, grading, or demolition permits.

12. Water Efficient Landscape Standards: This project is subject to the updated California Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (MWELO). The building permit application for grading and on-site improvements shall demonstrate compliance with the applicable MWELO and landscaping requirements and shall include the following. Replacement trees shall be provided consistent with the Conditions of Approval of the associated Tree Removal Permit. a. A Landscape Documentation Package prepared by an authorized and licensed professional demonstrating compliance with the full MWELO requirements with the following required elements:
1) Project Information per Section 492.3.
2) Water Efficient Landscape Worksheet per Section 492.4 (Appendix B of the MWELO).
i. Include the worksheet within the plan set AND
ii. Provide a separate 8.5x11 hard copy or pdf via email to the project planner.
3) Soil Management Report per Section 492.5 (unless significant mass grading is planned, in which case the report shall be submitted prior to permit final). 4) Landscape Design Plan per Section 492.6.
5) Irrigation Design Plan per Section 492.7.
6) Grading Design Plan per Section 492.8.

Note that a Soil Management Report (if not submitted as part of the Landscape Documentation Package) and Certificate of Completion will be required prior to permit final.
b. A completed Landscape Information Form.
c. A note on the Cover Sheet in minimum 1/2” high lettering stating “Planning Final Required. The new landscaping indicated on the plans must be installed prior to final inspection. Changes to the landscaping plan require Planning approval.”

13.a
Packet Pg. 351
Attachment: CC Ordinance (PD Permit) (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue) Conditions of Approval – Planned Development Permit Page 3 44 and 56 Sunnyside Avenue

13. Construction Activities : The applicant shall abide by the following requirements during construction and demolition activity:

A. General City Requirements : Construction activity shall comply with these general City construction requirements:
a. The project site shall be posted with the name and contact number of the lead contractor in a location visible from the public street prior to the issuance of building permits.
b. Construction activities shall be limited to weekdays between 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. and Saturdays between 9:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. No construction shall take place on Sundays or holidays unless an exception is granted by the Building Official.
c. All construction equipment with internal combustion engines used on the project site shall be properly muffled and maintained in good working condition. d. Unnecessary idling of internal combustion engines shall be strictly prohibited. e. All stationary noise -generating construction equipment, such as air compressors and portable power generators, shall be located as far as possible from noise - sensitive receptors such as existing residences and businesses.

B. Noise Attenuation Measures: Due to the proximity of adjacent residences, the following noise attenuation measures shall be implemented:
a. All construction equipment shall be properly maintained in good working order. b. Prior to construction activities, designate a “Construction Noise Coordinator” who would be responsible for responding to any local complaints about construction noise. The Construction Noise Coordinator shall determine the cause of the complaint and shall require that reasonable measures warranted to correct the problem be implemented (potentially including temporary noise barriers). The telephone number for the Construction Noise Coordinator shall be conspicuously posted at the construction site.
c. The construction contractor shall provide, at least three weeks prior to the start of construction activities, written notification to all nearby residential units within 200 feet of the construction site informing them of the estimated start date and duration of construction activities.
d. Locate temporary generators and air compressors (if utilized) as far away from sensitive noise receptors as necessary to reduce noise.

C. BAAQMD Required Fugitive Dust Control Measures: The applicant shall require their construction contractors to reduce construction -related fugitive dust by implementing BAAQMD’s basic control measures at all construction and staging areas, including:
a. All exposed surfaces (e.g., parking areas, staging areas, soil piles, graded areas, and unpaved access roads) shall be watered two times per day. b. All haul trucks transporting soil, sand, or other loose material off site shall be covered.

13.a
Packet Pg. 352
Attachment: CC Ordinance (PD Permit) (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue) Conditions of Approval – Planned Development Permit Page 4 44 and 56 Sunnyside Avenue
c. All visible mud or dirt track-out onto adjacent public roads shall be removed using wet power vacuum street sweepers at least once per day. The use of dry power sweeping is prohibited.
d. All vehicle speeds on unpaved roads shall be limited to 15 miles per hour. e. All roadways, driveways, and sidewalks to be paved shall be completed as soon as possible. Building pads shall be laid as soon as possible after grading unless seeding or soil binders are used.
f. A publicly visible sign shall be posted with the telephone number and person to contact the builder regarding dust complaints. This person shall respond and take corrective action with ub 48 hours. The Air District’s phone number shall also be visible to ensure compliance with applicable regulations.

D. BAAQMD Required Basic Exhaust Emissions Reduction Measures. The applicant shall require their construction contractors to implement the following measures during construction to reduce exhaust emissions:
a. Idling times shall be minimized either by shutting equipment off when not in use or reducing the maximum idling time to five minutes (as required by the California airborne toxics control measure Title 13, Section 2485 of California Code of Regulations). C lear signage shall be provided for construction workers at all access points.
b. All construction equipment shall be maintained and properly tuned in accordance with manufacturer’s specifications. All equipment shall be checked by a certified mechanic and determined to be running in proper condition prior to operation.

E. Construction Hours/Fines/Stop Work Notice: Failure to comply with above requirements that result in verified complaints may result in the issuance of a Stop Work Notice issued to the project with cessation of work for a minimum of seven (7) days from the date of issuance and an Administrative fine of up to $1,000.00.

F. Timely Completion : Once under construction it shall be the obligation of the property owner and contractor to demonstrate continued progress on the project. In the event the building permit expires, the City may impose fines or exercise administrative remedies to compel timely completion of work.

Building Division

14. Permit Required: Building permit applications shall be required for each new dwelling, and include Electrical/Plumbing/Mechanical fees when such work is part of the permit.

15. Conditions of Approval: The Conditions of Approval shall be stated in full on the cover sheet of construction plans submitted for building permits.

16. Construction Fencing: The property shall be properly enclosed with construction fencing to prevent unauthorized access to the site during construction. The construction site shall be secured to prevent vandalism and/or theft during hours when no work is being done.

13.a
Packet Pg. 353
Attachment: CC Ordinance (PD Permit) (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue) Conditions of Approval – Planned Development Permit Page 5 44 and 56 Sunnyside Avenue

FIRE DEPARTMENT

17. Aerial Access Required : Where required: Buildings or portions of buildings or facilities exceeding 30 feet (9144 mm) in height above the lowest level of fire department vehicle access shall be provided with approved fire apparatus access roads capable of accommodating fire department aerial apparatus. Overhead utility and power lines shall not be located within the aerial fire apparatus access roadway. 2. Width: Fire apparatus access roads shall have a minimum unobstructed width of 26 feet (7925) in the immediate vicinity of any building or portion of building more than 30 feet (9144 mm) in height. 3. Proximity to building: At least one of the required access routes meeting this condition shall be located within a minimum of 15 fe et (4572) and a maximum of 30 feet (9144mm) from the building, and shall be positioned parallel to one entire side of the building, as approved by the fire code official [CFC Chp. 5 and SCCFD SD&S A-1].
-Aerial access roadways shall meet the minimum road width of 26 feet -Aerial access roadways shall meet the required outside turning radii of 60 feet -Aerial access shown on sheet A19.
-Aerial access shall not be obstructed by any trees, balconies, or power lines.

18. Fire Sprinklers Required: An automatic residential fire sprinkler system shall be installed in all new one- and two-family dwellings.
- Sprinklers noted on sheet A01.

19. Fire Aerial Apparatus Access Roadway Required: Provide an access roadway with a paved all-weather surface, a minimum unobstructed width of 20 feet, vertical clearance of 13 feet 6 inches, minimum circulating turning radius of 50 feet outside, and a maximum slope of 15%.

Surface shall be capable of supporting 75K pounds. Installations shall conform to Fire Department Standard Details and Specifications sheet A-1. CFC Sec. 503. -Loading capacity verification shown on sheet TM4.

20. Fire Lanes Required: The minimum clear width of fire department access roads shall be 26 feet since aerial access is required. Fire apparatus access roads shall be designated and marked as a fire lane as set forth in Section 22500.1 of the California Vehicle Code. The entire 26 foot fire apparatus access roads shall be marked as fire lanes. Si gns or other approved notices shall be posted.
-Sheet A06 and TM4 shows proposed location of fire lane signs and red curb.

21. Fire Lanes Required: The minimum clear width of fire department access roads shall be 26 feet since aerial access is required. Fire apparatus access roads shall be designated and marked as a fire lane as set forth in Section 22500.1 of the California Vehicle Code. The entire 26 foot fire apparatus access roads shall be marked as fire lanes. Si gns or other approved notices shall be posted.
-Sheet A06 and TM4 shows proposed location of fire lane signs and red curb.

22. Ground Ladder Rescue Required: Ground-ladder rescue from second and third floor rooms shall be made possible for fire department operations. Climbing angle of seventy five degrees shall be demonstrated on the plans and maintained. Landscaping shall not be allowed to interfere with the required access (CFC Sec. 503 and 1031 NFPA 1932 Sec. 5.1.8 through

5.1.9.2).
-Sheet A19 and sheet A06 shows ground ladder access to emergency egress windows. -No landscaping, trees, fences, or buildings shall obstruct ladder access.

13.a
Packet Pg. 354
Attachment: CC Ordinance (PD Permit) (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue) Conditions of Approval – Planned Development Permit Page 6 44 and 56 Sunnyside Avenue

23. Construction Site Fire Safety: All construction sites must comply with applicable provisions of the CFC Chapter 33 and our Standard Detail and Specification S1-7. Provide appropriate notations on subsequent plan submittals, as appropriate to the project. CFC Chp. 33.

24. Buildings and Facilities Access: Approved fire apparatus access roads shall be provided for every facility, building or portion of a building hereafter constructed or moved into or with the jurisdiction. The fire apparatus access road shall comply with the requirements of this section and shall extend to within 150 feet of all portions of the facility and all portions of the exterior walls of the first story of the building as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the building or facility. [CFC, Section 503.1.1].

25. Address identification: New and existing buildings shall have approved address numbers, building numbers or approved building identification placed in a position that is plainly legible and visible from the street or road fronting the property. These numbers shall contrast with their background. Where required by the fire code official, address numbers shall be provided in additional approved locations to facilitate emergency response. Address numbers shall be Arabic numbers or alphabetical letters. Numbers shall be a minimum of 4 inches (101.6 mm) high with a minimum stroke width of 0.5 inch (12.7 mm). Where access is by means of a private road and the building cannot be viewed from the public way, a monument, pole or other sign or means shall be used to identify the structure. Address numbers shall be maintained. CFC Sec. 505.1.

26. Water Supply Requirements: Potable water supplies shall be protected from contamination caused by fire protection water supplies. It is the responsibility of the applicant and any contractors and subcontractors to contact the water purveyor supplying the site of such project, and to comply with the requirements of that purveyor. Such requirements shall be incorporated into the design of any water -based fire protection systems, and/or fire suppression water supply systems or storage containers that may be ph ysically connected in any manner to an appliance capable of causing contamination of the potable water supply of the purveyor of record. Final approval of the system(s) under consideration will not be granted by this office until compliance with the requirements of the water purveyor of record are documented by that purveyor as having been met by the applicant(s). 2022 CFC Sec. 903.3.5 and Health and Safety Code 13114.7.

13.a
Packet Pg. 355
Attachment: CC Ordinance (PD Permit) (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue) RESOLUTION NO. ___

BEING A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

CAMPBELL APPROVING A TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP TO

ALLOW A NEW RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION WITH SIX PRIVATE

LOTS AND ONE COMMON LOT AND A TREE REMOVAL PERMIT

FOR REMOVAL OF TWO ON -SITE 'PROTECTED' TREES IN
ASSOCIATION WITH CONSTRUCTION OF SIX (6) DETACHED

SMALL-LOT SINGLE -FAMILY DWELLINGS , FOR PROPERTY
LOCATED AT 44 AND 56 SUNNYSIDE AVENUE . FILE NO.: PLN - 2023-135

After notification and public hearing, as specified by law and after presentation by the Community Development Director, proponents and opponents, the hearing was closed.

The City Council finds as follows with regard to the approval of a Tentative Subdivision Map and Tree Removal Permit:

1. The Proposed Project is an application for a Tentative Subdivision Map to allow a new residential subdivision inclusive of six private lots and one common lot, and a Tree Removal Permit to allow removal of two "protected" White Mulberry trees , in association with a Planned Development Permit to allow construction of six "small -lot single-family" residential homes with an option for integrated accessory dwelling units (ADUs).

4. Due to the aforementioned preliminary application, the application is not subject to any objective design standards nor any zoning district specific development standards.

5. The Project Site was designated at the time of pre -application submittal as Low- Medium Density Residential (6 -13 units/gr. acre) and zoned P -D (Planned Development), as shown on the former Campbell General Plan and Zoning Maps, respectively.

6. The Project Site is currently developed with two single -family residences that will be demolished as part of the project.

13.b
Packet Pg. 356
Attachment: CC Resolution (T-Map, TRP) (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue) City Council Resolution – T-Map & Tree Removal Permit Page 2 of 4 44 and 56 Sunnyside Avenue
a historical assessment prepared by a professional historical consultant. These materials were peer -reviewed by the City’s Historical Architectural Advisor, who concurred with the determination that the property does not meet any of the minimum threshold e ligibility requirements needed to be listed on the California Register of Historic Resources or as a local historic resource by the City as either a Structure of Merit or a Landmark property. As such, its demolition would not constitute a "significant impact" under CEQA.

8. The Proposed Project's six units would result in a density of 12.8 units/gr. acre (6 units ÷ 0.468 gross acres), consistent with the density range of the applicable Medium Density Residential (14-20 units/gr. acre) designation. Although six units exceeds the allowable five units otherwise specified by former CMC Sec. 21.08.050.E., Table 2 -6 (General Development Standards – R-M Zoning District), pursuant to California Government Code § 65589.5, in cases where the general plan and zoning ordinance do not match, a project is only required to comply with the general plan.

9. The Proposed Project is not subject to the provisions CMC Chapter 21.24 (Inclusionary Housing Ordinance) in that it has fewer than 10 housing units.

10. The Proposed Project is a "housing development project" under State law, which limits the City in its capability to "deny, reduce the density for, or render infeasible" the project under the Housing Accountability Act (HAA) (Government Code Section 65589.5) unless: 1) the proposal is found to be in violation of an o bjective general plan/zoning standard (other than those waived/reduced through use of the Density Bonus law); or 2) the project will result in a specific adverse impact to public health and safety.

11. The Proposed Project would be consistent with the following General Plan policies and strategies:

Policy LUT-5.2: Residential Neighborhoods: Maintain safe, attractive, pedestrian friendly residential neighborhoods with identifiable centers and consistent development patterns and a range of public and private services.

Strategy LUT-5.2a: Neighborhood Compatibility: Promote new residential development and substantial additions that are designed to maintain and support the existing character and development pattern of the surrounding neighborhood, especially in historic neighborhoods and neighborhoods with consistent design characteristics.

Policy LUT-9.3: Design and Planning Compatibility: Promote high quality, creative design and site planning that is compatible with surrounding development, public spaces and natural resources.

Strategy LUT-9.3e: Building Materials: Encourage the use of long-lasting, high quality building materials on all buildings to ensure the long-term quality of the built environment.

12. The Tentative Vesting Subdivision Map will allow creation of privately held parcels for fee title ownership as well as common parcels to be improved with a private roadway, parking, open space, and landscaping.

13.b
Packet Pg. 357
Attachment: CC Resolution (T-Map, TRP) (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue) City Council Resolution – T-Map & Tree Removal Permit Page 3 of 4 44 and 56 Sunnyside Avenue

13. As a condition of approval, the applicant shall record Covenants, Codes and Restrictions (CC&R’s) for the Proposed Project, forming a Homeowner's Association (HOA) and formalizing the operational responsibilities of the HOA and satisfying the "exception to access requirement" for a lots without frontage upon a public street pursuant to CMC Sec. 20.16.035.

14. The proposed Tentative Subdivision Map incorporates a requirement for off-site public improvements including dedication of right -of-way for public street purposes and installation of City standard curb, gutter, sidewalk, driveways, and street tree(s).

15. The Proposed Project incorporates a requirement for off -site public improvements including dedication of right -of-way for public street purposes and installation of City standard curb, gutter, sidewalk, driveways, street tree(s), and street light(s).

16. No substantial evidence has been presented which shows that the project, as currently presented and subject to the required conditions of approval, will have a significant adverse impact on the environment.

17. There is a reasonable relationship and a rough proportionality between the Conditions of Approval and the impacts of the project.

18. There is a reasonable relationship between the use of the fees imposed upon the project and the type of development project.

Based upon the foregoing findings of fact, the City Council further finds and concludes that:

Tentative Subdivision Map Findings (Govt. Code § 66410 et seq.):

1. That the proposed map is consistent with applicable general and specific plans;

2. That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with applicable general and specific plans;

3. That the site is physically suitable for the type of development;

4. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development;

5. That the design of the subdivision or the propose improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat;

6. The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not cause serious public health problems; and

7. The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision or that alternative easements for access will be provided, and that these will be substantially equivalent to ones previously acquired by the public;

13.b
Packet Pg. 358
Attachment: CC Resolution (T-Map, TRP) (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue) City Council Resolution – T-Map & Tree Removal Permit Page 4 of 4 44 and 56 Sunnyside Avenue
Tree Removal Permit Finding(s) (CMC Sec. 21.32.080.A):

8. Economic enjoyment and hardship. The retention of the tree(s) restricts the economic enjoyment of the property or creates an unusual hardship for the property owner by severely limiting the use of the property in a manner not typically experienced by owners of similarly zoned and situated properties, and the applicant has demonstrated to the satisfaction of the approval authority that there are no reasonable alternatives to preserve the tree(s);
Environmental Findings (CMC Sec. 21.38.050):

9. This project is Categorically Exempt under Section 15332 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), pertaining to In-Fill Development Projects which are found consistent with all applicable general plan policies and zoning regulations, are under five acres in size, and substantially surrounded by urban uses; and

10. There are no unusual circumstances that would prevent the project from qualifying as Categorically Exempt per Section 15300.2 of the CEQA Guidelines, including specifically that the s ubject property does not contain an "historical resource" under CEQA.

THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approves a Tentative Subdivision Map to allow a new residential subdivision inclusive of six private lots and one common lot, and a Tree Removal Permit to allow removal of two "protected" White Mulberry trees, on property located at 44 and 56 Sunnyside Avenue, subject to the attached Conditions of Approval (attached Exhibit A).

PASSED AND ADOPTED this _______ day of ________________, 2024, by the following roll call vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:

APPROVED:

Susan M. Landry, Mayor
ATTEST:

Andrea Sanders, City Clerk

13.b
Packet Pg. 359
Attachment: CC Resolution (T-Map, TRP) (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue)

EXHIBIT A

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Tentative Subdivision Map and Tree Removal Permit

Additionally, the appli cant is hereby notified that he/she is required to comply with all applicable Codes or Ordinances of the City of Campbell and the State of California that pertain to this development and are not herein specified.

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Planning Division:

1. Approved Project: Approval is granted for a Tentative Subdivision Map to allow a new residential subdivision inclusive of six private lots and one common lot, and a Tree Removal Permit to allow removal of two "protected" White Mulberry trees, on property located at 44 and 56 Sunnyside Avenue. The Tract Map shall substantially conform to the Tentative Subdivision Map (and associated civil sheets), included as Attachment E in the January 22, 2024, City Council Staff Report, except as may be modified by conditions of approval contained herein.

2. Approval Expiration: The Tentative Subdivision Map approval is valid for a period of two (2) years from the effective date of the City Council Ordinance approving the associated Planned Development Permit. Within this time period, the Tract Map ("final map") shall be approved by the City Council and recorded with the Office of the Santa Clara County Clerk-Recorder.

3. Planned Development Permit : The Tentative Vesting Subdivision Map is contingent upon approval of the associated Planned Development Permit. However, a Tract Map may not be recorded if the Planned Development Permit expires or is otherwise rendered void.

4. Street Name : The tract map shall indicate the street name authorized by the Community Development Director.

5. Timing of Tree Removal: Protected tree(s) shall be removed only in conjunction with demolition of existing on-site structures upon issuance of a Demolition Permit.

6. Tree Protection Plan : The tree protection measures identified by the "44 & 56 Sunnyside Ave Arborist Report 2023" are herein incorporated by reference and shall be implemented prior to issuance of permits.

7. Construction Measures: The construction activity requirements identified in Condition of Approval No. 1 3 of the City Council Ordinance approving the associated Planned Development Permit are herein incorporated by reference and shall be implemented for demolition activity required prior to recordation of the tract map.

13.b
Packet Pg. 360
Attachment: CC Resolution (T-Map, TRP) (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue) Conditions of Approval – T-Map and Tree Removal Permit Page 2 44 and 56 Sunnyside Avenue

8. Property Maintenance: The property is to be maintained free of any combustible trash, debris, and weeds until the time that actual construction commences. Any vacant existing structures shall be secured, by having windows boarded up and doors sealed shut, or be demolished o r removed from the property (Section 11.201 and 11.414, 1985 Ed. Uniform Fire Code).

9. Covenants, Codes and Restrictions (CC&R’s): Prior recordation of the Tract Map, the applicant shall submit for review and approval by the City a copy of the draft CC&R’s which shall include the following provisions. The draft CC&R's shall be accompanied with a response letter that indicates where in the CC&R's each of the following provisions has been addressed. The applicant shall remunerate the City for the full cost incurred by the City to review the draft CC&R's.
a. Formation of a Homeowner’s Association (HOA) to ensure the long -term maintenance of buildings and property.
b. Continued architectural controls to ensure the architectural integrity of the project consistent with the Approved Project Plans.
c. Definition of common areas to be maintained and provision of maintenance for these areas.
d. Provision which shall define the rights of use, allowable landscape or open space improvements.
e. Provision that all landscaping—including private landscaping located in front, side, and rear yards—shall be maintained in compliance with the Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (MWELO) Landscape Documentation Package. f. Provision of a funding mechanism to ensure maintenance and upkeep of common areas.
g. Provision to provide ongoing maintenance of the required private roadways, landscaping, and etc.
h. Provision of liability insurance in amount in keeping with accepted industry standards covering all common areas and all damage or injury caused by negligence of the HOA, its board or any of its agents, or the Owners, against any liability to the public or to any Owner incident to the use of or resulting from any accident or intentional or unintentional act of an Owner or third -party occurring in or about any common area.
i. Provision that requires ongoing maintenance of the landscaped park strip and tree wells in the public right of way. This includes, but is not limited to: trees, lawn, plantings, irrigation, etc. Trees shall not be pruned in a manner that would not allow the tree to grow to a mature height.
j. Provision for regular monitoring and maintenance of the stormwater system, in accordance with the manufacturer’s recommendations, including the permeable pavement system.
k. Provision for regular monitoring and maintenance of the private sanitary system as documented by the design engineer.

13.b
Packet Pg. 361
Attachment: CC Resolution (T-Map, TRP) (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue) Conditions of Approval – T-Map and Tree Removal Permit Page 3 44 and 56 Sunnyside Avenue
l. Provision for the availability of interior garage space for the parking of vehicles at all times.
m. Provision to prohibit the use of outside parking spaces for storage purposes, including boats, trailers, and recreational vehicles.
n. Provision to prohibit vehicle washing, and vehicle repair and maintenance activities in the project site, including, but not limited to garages and common parking areas.

PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT

10. Construction Drawings: The applicant shall submit the following permit applications prior to, or concurrent with the main Building permit application:
a. Encroachment Permit for Street Improvement Plans: The frontage improvements for the project shall be shown on a separate street improvement plan as detailed here: https://www.campbellca.gov/187/Street- Improvements
b. Building Permit for On-Site / Grading & Drainage Plans: The on-site grading, drainage, stormwater, landscaping, ADA and site improvements for the project shall be shown on a separate building permit plan as detailed here:
https://www.campbellca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/16594
c. Tract Map: The subdivision map documents required for this project shall be submitted for review by the City Surveyor as detailed here:
https://www.campbellca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/1478

11. Tract (Final) Map: Prior to issuance of any grading or building permits for the project, the applicant shall submit a Tract Map for review by the City and recordation, upon approval by the City Council, pay various fees/deposits and submit the map in a digital format acceptable to the City.

12. City Alleyway: Consistent with recent projects in the area, the Tract Map shall include a restriction on access from this project to the adjacent City alleyway.

13. Right-of-Way for Public Street Purposes : Upon recordation of the Tract Map, the applicant shall fully complete the process to cause additional right -of-way to be granted in fee for public street purposes along the Sunnyside Avenue frontage to accommodate the new detached sidewalk, unless otherw ise approved by the City Engineer. The applicant shall submit the necessary documents for approval by the City Engineer, process the submittal with City staff’s comments and fully complete the right-of-way process. Th e applicant shall cause all documents to be prepared by a registered civil engineer/land surveyor, as necessary, for the City’s review and recordation.

14. Private Easements: Upon recordation of the Tract Map, the applicant shall cause private easements to be recorded for private utilities, reciprocal ingress and egress, emergency vehicles, etc.

15. Monumentation for Tract Map: Prior to recordation of the Tract Map, the applicant shall provide a cash deposit for setting all monuments shown on the map.

13.b
Packet Pg. 362
Attachment: CC Resolution (T-Map, TRP) (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue) Conditions of Approval – T-Map and Tree Removal Permit Page 4 44 and 56 Sunnyside Avenue
Monuments shall be set per section 20.76.010 of the Campbell Municipal Code including but not limited to setting permanent pipe monuments (three -fourths inch galvanized steel pipe two feet long approximately six inches below finished grade) at each boundary of all lot corners within a subdivision, along the exterior boundary lines at intervals of approximately five hundred feet and at all beginning of curves and ending of curves on property lines, and monument boxes at intersections of all street monument line tangents.

16. Park Impact Fee: A fee in-lieu of parkland dedication pursuant to Campbell Municipal Code (CMC) Chapter 20.24 (Park Impact Fees and Park Land Dedication Subdivisions) is required. The in -lieu fee shall be equal to the fee for six (6) new dwelling units based on the Single- family rate, less credit for two (2) existing single- family dwellings at the Single-family rate. The fee in effect at the time of payment, as established by the City's Schedule of Fees, shall be the fee due. The fee shall be due to prior to recordation of the Tract Map.

17. Demolition: Prior to recordation of the Tract Map the applicant shall obtain a demolition permit and remove any nonconforming structures.

18. Soils Report: Upon submittal of the Tract Map, applicant shall provide a soils report prepared by a registered geotechnical or civil engineer.

19. Grading and Drainage Plan: Prior to recordation of the Tract Map, the applicant shall conduct hydrology studies based on a ten -year storm frequency, prepare an engineered grading and drainage plan, and pay fees required to obtain necessary grading permits. Prior to occupancy, the design engineer shall provide written certification that the development has been built per the engineered grading and drainage plans.

20. Storm Drain Area Fee: Prior to recordation of the Tract Map, the applicant shall pay the required Storm Drain Area fee, currently set at $2,120.00 per net acre, which is $847.79 (set for R-1 land use).

21. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Measures : Prior to issuance of any grading or building permits, the applicant shall comply with the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit requirements, Santa Clara Valley Water District requirements, and the Campbell Municipal Code regarding stormwater pollution prevention. The primary objectives are to improve the quality and reduce the quantity of stormwater runoff to the bay.

Resources to achieve these objectives include Stormwater Best Management Practices Handbook for New Development and Redevelopment (“CA BMP Handbook”) by the California Stormwater Quality Association (CASQA), 2003; Start at the Source: A Design Guidance Manual for Stormwater Quality Protection (“Start at the Source”) by the Bay Area Stormwater Management Agencies Association (BASMAA), 1999; and Using Site Design Techniques to Meet Development Standards for Stormwater Quality: A Companion Document to Start at the Source (“Using Site Design Techniques”) by BASMAA, 2003.

13.b
Packet Pg. 363
Attachment: CC Resolution (T-Map, TRP) (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue) Conditions of Approval – T-Map and Tree Removal Permit Page 5 44 and 56 Sunnyside Avenue

22. Permeable Pavement: The proposed stormwater treatment plan is dependent on the use of permeable pavement for the common area driveway. Therefore, this project is required to use permeable pavers or permeable concrete for the areas as identified on the included stormwater treatment plan. The CC&R’s for the project shall require the HOA to perform annual maintenance of the permeable pavement, including vacuum sweeping of the permeable pavement prior to the beginning of the rainy season.

23. Water Meter(s) and Sewer Cleanout(s): Existing and proposed water meter(s) and sewer cleanout(s) shall be relocated or installed on private property behind the public right-of-way line.

24. Utility Coordination Plan: Prior to issuance of building permits for the site, the applicant shall submit a utility coordination plan and schedule for approval by the City Engineer for installation and/or abandonment of all utilities. The plan shall clearly show the location and size of all existing utilities and the associated main lines; indicate which utilities and services are to remain; which utilities and services are to be abandoned, and where new utilities and services will be installed. Joint trenches for new utilities shall be used whenever possible.

25. Pavement Restoration: The applicant shall restore the pavement in compliance with City standard requirements. In the event that the roadway has recently received a pavement treatment or reconstruction, the project will be subject to the City’s Street Cut Moratorium. The applicant will be required to perform enhanced pavement restoration consistent with the restora tion requirements associated with the Street Cut Moratorium. The City’s Pavement Maintenance Program website (https://www.ci.campbell.ca.us/219) has detailed information on the streets currently under moratorium and the enhanced restoration requirements.

26. Street Improvement Agreements / Plans / Encroachment Permit / Fees / Deposits:

Prior to recordation of the Tract Map, the applicant shall execute a street improvement agreement, cause plans for public street improvements to be prepared by a registered civil engineer, pay various fees and deposits, post security and provide insurance necessary to obtain an encroachment permit for construction of the standard public street improvements, as required by the City Engineer. The plans shall include the following, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer:
a. Show location of all existing utilities within the new and existing public right of way.
b. Relocation of all existing utilities including utility boxes, covers, poles, etc. outside of sidewalk area. No utility boxes, covers, etc. will be allowed in the sidewalk area.
c. Removal of existing driveway approaches, curb, gutter and sidewalk. d. Installation of City approved street trees, tree wells and irrigation at 30 feet on center.
e. Installation of City standard curb, gutter, detached sidewalk and ADA compliant driveway approach.

13.b
Packet Pg. 364
Attachment: CC Resolution (T-Map, TRP) (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue) Conditions of Approval – T-Map and Tree Removal Permit Page 6 44 and 56 Sunnyside Avenue
f. Installation of asphalt concrete overlay per street pavement restoration plan for utility installation and/or abandonment, as required by the City Engineer. g. Installation of streetlights, conduits, conductors and related facilities in accordance with the City of Campbell’s Street Lighting Policies. h. Installation of traffic control, stripes and signs.
i. Construction of conforms to existing public and private improvements, as necessary.
j. Submit final plans in a digital format acceptable to the City.

27. Street Improvements Completed for Occupancy and Building Permit Final: Prior to allowing occupancy and/or final building permit signoff for any and/or all buildings, the applicant shall have the required street improvements installed and accepted by the City, and the design engineer shall submit as-built drawings to the City.

28. Maintenance of Landscaping: Owner(s), current and future, are required to maintain the landscaped park strip and tree wells in the public right of way. This includes, but is not limited to: trees, lawn, plantings, irrigation, etc. Trees shall not be pruned in a manner that would not allow the tree to grow to a mature height.

29. Utility Encroachment Permit: Separate encroachment permits for the installation of utilities to serve the development will be required (including water, sewer, gas, electric, etc.). Applicant shall apply for and pay all necessary fees for utility permits for sanitary sewer, gas, water, electric and all other utility work.

30. Additional Street Improvements: Should it be discovered after the approval process that new utility main lines, extra utility work or other work is required to service the development, and should those facilities or other work affect any public improvements, the City may add conditions to the development/project/permit, at the discretion of the City Engineer, to restore pavement or other public improvements to the satisfaction of the City.

13.b
Packet Pg. 365
Attachment: CC Resolution (T-Map, TRP) (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue) 44 Sunnyside Avenue
Campbell, CA
Historic Resource Evaluation - FINAL
Prepared for
Sachneel Patel
Granite Ridge Properties
East Palo Alto, CA
Pr
epared by
Garavaglia Architecture, Inc.

March 3, 2023

13.c
Packet Pg. 366
Attachment: Historical Assessment (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue) 44 SUNNYSIDE AVENUE, CAMPBELL
Historic Resource Evaluation – FINAL March 3, 2023

TABLE OF CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ..... 1 Project overview ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ .... 1 Methodology ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ .......... 3 RESOURCE DESCRIPTION ................................ ................................ ................................ ................... 4 Site ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ............................ 4 Main Building ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ........ 5 Garage ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ .................... 18 HISTORICAL BACKGROUND ................................ ................................ ................................ ........... 20 Campbell Development ................................ ................................ ................................ ..................... 20 Summary of Geographical Development ................................ ................................ ..................... 20 Architecture and Shelter ................................ ................................ ................................ ................. 22 Site Evolution ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ....... 23 Development of 44 Sunnyside Avenue ................................ ................................ ......................... 23 Ownership & Construction Chronology ................................ ................................ ........................ 26 Ownership History ................................ ................................ ................................ .......................... 26 Construction Chronology ................................ ................................ ................................ ............... 26 Ownership and Construction Chronology Overview ................................ ................................ 28 EVALUATION FRAMEWORK ................................ ................................ ................................ ............ 33 The National Register Criteria for Evaluation (NRHP) ................................ ............................... 33 Criteria ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ............... 33 The California Register Criteria for Evaluation ................................ ................................ ............ 33 Historic Integrity ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ . 34 City of Campbell Criteria ................................ ................................ ................................ .................. 34 FINDINGS ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ................ 36 National Register of Historic Places/California Register of Historical Resources Evaluation ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ . 36 Criterion A/1 (event) ................................ ................................ ................................ ....................... 36 Criterion B/2 (person) ................................ ................................ ................................ ..................... 37 Criterion C/3 (design/construction) ................................ ................................ ............................ 37 Criterion D/4 (information potential) ................................ ................................ ........................... 38 Historic Integrity Evaluation ................................ ................................ ................................ ............. 38 City of Campbell Criteria Evaluation ................................ ................................ .............................. 39 CONCLUSION ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ......... 40 REFERENCES ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ........... 41 APPENDIX A: Parcel Map ................................ ................................ ................................ ...................... A APPENDIX B: Sunnyside Tract Map, 1904 ................................ ................................ .......................... B APPENDIX C: Campbell Sanborn Map, 1920 ................................ ................................ ..................... C APPENDIX D: Campbell Sanborn Map, 1928 ................................ ................................ .................... D APPENDIX E: DPR 523A Form, 1977 ................................ ................................ ................................ .... E APPENDIX F: DPR 523A Form, 1999 ................................ ................................ ................................ ... G

13.c
Packet Pg. 367
Attachment: Historical Assessment (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue) 44 SUNNYSIDE AVENUE, CAMPBELL
Historic Resource Evaluation – FINAL March 3, 2023

1 INTRODUCTION

PROJECT OVERVIEW
Garavaglia Architecture, Inc. was contracted by Sachneel Patel, Managing Director of Granite Ridge Properties, in October of 2022 to prepare a Historic Resource Evaluati on (HRE) for the property at 44 Sunnyside Avenue in Campbell (Figures 1 and 2 ). This report has been requested in connection with the anticipated purchase of the property for a development project . The building has been previously recorded on DPR forms as part of a historical survey for the City of Campbell and is not part of an existing or identified potential historic district.

Figure 1. Parcel map with subject property highlighted in yellow (Santa Clara County Assessor’s Office, amended by author )

13.c
Packet Pg. 368
Attachment: Historical Assessment (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue) 44 SUNNYSIDE AVENUE, CAMPBELL
Historic Resource Evaluation – FINAL March 3, 2023

2 Figure 2. Subject property outlined in red with building highlighted in yellow (Google Maps, 2022, amended by author )
Previous Evaluations
The property was recorded on a DPR 523A form in October 1977, by James Finkbeiner, as part of the City of Campbell Historic Sur vey of 1977-1978.1 On August 24, 1983 , the Campbell Historic Preservation Board (HPB) considered a request by William Harman and Darol Blunt to allow the demolition of the structure .2 At the meeting, t he City of Campbell HPB staff recommended that the Board review the historic significance of the structure, and if it was

1 James Finkbeiner, 44 Sunnyside Avenue: DPR 523A Form , City of Campbell, 1977. 2 Historic Preservation Board, Meeting Minutes, August 24, 1983, City of Campbell.

13.c
Packet Pg. 369
Attachment: Historical Assessment (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue) 44 SUNNYSIDE AVENUE, CAMPBELL
Historic Resource Evaluation – FINAL March 3, 2023

3 found that the structure did not warrant further study, the Board should forward a memorandum to the City of Campbell Building Departm ent allowing the demolition of the structure. A motion to forward a letter to the Building Department stating that the structure located at 44 Sunnyside Avenue “does not warrant further study and that the applicant be allowed to either demolish or remove t his structure from its present site” carried unanimously. 3

The property was also recorded on a DPR 523A form in April 1999, by architect Leslie A. G.

Dill, as part of the City of Campbell Historic Resource Inventory Update that began in 1997.4 The property was given a score of 83 out of 100, with the score being an average of individual scores for visual quality/design, history/association, environmental/context, and integrity. 5 As a result of this survey, the property was added to t he City of Campbell’s list of properties that are not listed on the City’s Historic Resource Inventory, but are potentially eligible for future designation.

This HRE will address the subject property’s eligibility for listing as a historic resource on the California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR) , as and on the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP), and on Campbell’s local inventory.

METHODOLOGY
Garavaglia Architecture, Inc. staff conducted a site visit and survey of the property’s interior and exterior on November 7 , 20 22, with the current homeowner, Chad Hester, and his father, Larry. During this visit , staff documented the building’s configuration and architectural elements with photographs and field notes . On site, t he homeowner provided a history of alterations made to the property, a building permit for electric service upgrades from 1996, a Metroscan property profile listing the property characteristics , and a Google Earth overhead view. The homeowner later provided a chain of title for the property, including copies of the historic deeds, as well as a survey map of the property from 1889, and a map of the Sunnyside Tract from 1904.

Garavaglia Architecture Inc . also conducted additional archival research on the subject property and surrounding area. The following repositories/collections were consulted to complete the research process. (See References section for complete list of resources)

• Ancestry.com
• Campbell Express Library
• City of Campbell Planning Division
• Santa Clara County Assessor’s Office
• Santa Clara County Department of Planning and Development

3 Ibid.
4 Leslie A. G. Dill, 44 Sunnyside Avenue: DPR 523A Form , City of Campbell, 1999. 5 City of Campbell, 1997 Survey Records, on file with the City of Campbell Planning Division.

13.c
Packet Pg. 370
Attachment: Historical Assessment (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue) 44 SUNNYSIDE AVENUE, CAMPBELL
Historic Resource Evaluation – FINAL March 3, 2023

4 RESOURCE DESCRIPTION

Figure 3. Overall view of 44 Sunnyside Avenue’s lot, looking south (Garavaglia Architecture, Inc., November 2022)
SITE
The subject property at 44 Sunnyside Avenue (APN: 412-04-018) in Campbell, CA, is located along the south side of Sunnyside Avenue, between Winchester Boulevard and Industrial Street (Figure 3). The property consists of a roughly .2-acre rectangular lot, which measures 60 feet by 145 feet. The property consists of a one-story single-family residence, and a separate wood frame garage structure. The property is in a P-D zoning district for planned development.

The house faces north along Sunnyside Avenue. The garage structure is situated in the southwest corner of the subject parcel and backs up to the rear property line (Figure 4). A paved concrete driveway runs along the west of the property, extending from Sunnyside Avenue back to the garage. A metal fence encloses the front yard and extends across the driveway to secure access. Wood fences separate the property from the neighboring properties on the east and south sides, and the front half of the west side. The back half of the west side property line is delineated by a concrete block wall. There are various shrubs, flowers, and trees in the front and rear yards, including a mature citrus tree in the rear yard .

13.c
Packet Pg. 371
Attachment: Historical Assessment (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue) 44 SUNNYSIDE AVENUE, CAMPBELL
Historic Resource Evaluation – FINAL March 3, 2023

5 Figure 4. Wood frame garage at rear southwest corner of property at 44 Sunnyside Avenue (Garavaglia Architecture, Inc., November 2022)

MAIN BUILDING
44 Sunnyside Avenue is a roughly rectangular, one -story, 884-square-foot bungalow with some Neoclassical Revival characteristics, such as a full-facade porch with prominent square columns and a wide cornice line (Figure 5 ). The house is clad with beveled horizontal lap siding painted white with light blue wood accents and trim. The roof is a steeply-pitched hip roof with a shed addition and a flat -roofed addition at the rear . It has dark gray composition shingles, and the overhanging boxed eaves have light blue wood trim and white beadboard soffits . 44 Sunnyside Avenue has two one-story rear additions, which have a mix of wood siding materials, including beveled siding, shiplap siding, solid board siding, and some lattice enclosure elements .

13.c
Packet Pg. 372
Attachment: Historical Assessment (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue) 44 SUNNYSIDE AVENUE, CAMPBELL
Historic Resource Evaluation – FINAL March 3, 2023

6 Figure 5. North elevation of 44 Sunnyside Avenue (Garavaglia Architecture, Inc., November 2022) The primary north elevation of 44 Sunnyside Avenue faces the street, and is set back approximately 25 feet from the road. The main feature of this elevation is the recessed front porch that spans the entire front facade. The portion of the roof overhanging the porch is supported by four square, wood columns, which sit atop a solid railing that runs the full width of the porch. The columns are four-by-four wood columns with chamfered corners and square capitals and bases (Figure 6). The solid railing is clad with beveled wood siding, painted white to match the walls of the house, with light blue wood accent trim running across the top and bottom of the railing. The house has a wide cornice line that is clad with beveled wood siding, painted white to match the walls of the house.

13.c
Packet Pg. 373
Attachment: Historical Assessment (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue) 44 SUNNYSIDE AVENUE, CAMPBELL
Historic Resource Evaluation – FINAL March 3, 2023

7 Figure 6. Front porch column detail of 44 Sunnyside Avenue (Garavaglia Architecture, Inc., November 2022)

The porch is entered from the north side, slightly off-center, with two concrete steps leading to the wood porch floor. The porch floor is wood tongue and groove painted light blue to match the trim on the house. A cut line showing variation in the floorboards seems to indicate that the front porch may have been expanded towards the street at some point in time (Figure 7).

Alterations to the front porch also seem to be evidenced by the way in which the columns sit atop the solid railing, with a sligh t overhang towards the front facade of the house. This does not appear to be the original configuration of the front porch.

13.c
Packet Pg. 374
Attachment: Historical Assessment (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue) 44 SUNNYSIDE AVENUE, CAMPBELL
Historic Resource Evaluation – FINAL March 3, 2023

8 Figure 7. Detail of the front porch at 44 Sunnyside Avenue showing the variation in the floorboards and the overhanging column (Garavaglia Architecture, Inc., November 2022 )

The ceiling of the front porch is wood beadboard painted white. The house’s main entrance is situated slightly off -center under the roof of the front porch, in line with the front steps, and consists of a wood door with an oval lite. A screen door with a white finish is installed in front of the main entrance door. Two single-hung fiberglass windows flank the entrance, at the porch.

The windows are one-over-one with white framing (Figure 8). The main entrance and windows are framed with wood trim painted light blue.

13.c
Packet Pg. 375
Attachment: Historical Assessment (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue) 44 SUNNYSIDE AVENUE, CAMPBELL
Historic Resource Evaluation – FINAL March 3, 2023

9 Figure 8. Window to the left of the front door at 44 Sunnyside Avenue (Garavaglia Architecture, Inc., November 2022)

The west elevation faces the concrete driveway that runs along the west edge of the property (Figure 9). There are two one-story additions at the south end of the elevation ; the first addition has a shed roof, while the second (southernmost) addition has a flat roof . The additions are set back approximately five feet from the west facade of the main house. This elevation is primarily clad with beveled siding painted white with light blue wood accents and trim. The southernmost addition has a combination of solid wood board siding and lattice painted white.

The roof at this elevation has overhanging eaves like those found at the north elevation.

13.c
Packet Pg. 376
Attachment: Historical Assessment (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue) 44 SUNNYSIDE AVENUE, CAMPBELL
Historic Resource Evaluation – FINAL March 3, 2023

10 Figure 9. West elevation of 44 Sunnyside Avenue (Garavaglia Architecture, Inc., November 2022 )

The main house has three single-hung fiberglass windows on this elevation, which are all one- over-one with white framing and light blue wood trim. The central window is smaller than the other two and has obscured glass. The first rear addition has one one -over-one wood window with light blue framing and trims (Figure 10). The second (southernmost) rear addition does not have a window on this elevation.

13.c
Packet Pg. 377
Attachment: Historical Assessment (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue) 44 SUNNYSIDE AVENUE, CAMPBELL
Historic Resource Evaluation – FINAL March 3, 2023

11 Figure 10. View of wood window on west elevation of first rear addition at 44 Sunnyside Avenue, with second rear addition clad in solid board siding and lattice to the right (Garavaglia Architecture, Inc., November 2022)

The house’s south elevation faces a fenced- in backyard and the detached garage structure . The main feature of the south elevation is the second addition attached to the rear of the main house. The second addition has a flat roof with white exposed rafters and overhanging eaves.

The western three -fourths of this addition are enclosed, with the other one -fourth remaining open for use as a shed. The enclosed portion has horizontal shiplap siding painted white, with a central trim band painted light blue (Figure 1 1).

13.c
Packet Pg. 378
Attachment: Historical Assessment (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue) 44 SUNNYSIDE AVENUE, CAMPBELL
Historic Resource Evaluation – FINAL March 3, 2023

12 Figure 11. View of the south elevation of 44 Sunnyside Avenue , showing the second (southernmost) addition in the foreground, with the shed roof of the first addition beyond (Garavaglia Architecture, Inc., November 2022)

The enclosed portion of the south elevation has one six-panel wood door, which is white with blue trim, and one fixed wood window with 13 panes, which has light blue framing and trims (Figure 12). The remaining open portion of the south elevation, which is open for storage, has two one-over-one wood windows on its back wall where the second addition attaches to the first addition. These windows have light blue framing and trims (Figure 1 3).

13.c
Packet Pg. 379
Attachment: Historical Assessment (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue) 44 SUNNYSIDE AVENUE, CAMPBELL
Historic Resource Evaluation – FINAL March 3, 2023

13 Figure 12. View of the 13-pane window on the south elevation of 44 Sunnyside Avenue (Garavaglia Architecture, Inc., November 2022)

Figure 13. View of the two one -over-one wood windows on the eastern portion of the south elevation of 44 Sunnyside Avenue (Garavaglia Architecture, Inc., November 2022 ) The east elevation of 44 Sunnyside Avenue faces the neighboring property at 56 Sunnyside Avenue (Figure 1 4). There are two one -story additions at the south end of the elevation ; the first

13.c
Packet Pg. 380
Attachment: Historical Assessment (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue) 44 SUNNYSIDE AVENUE, CAMPBELL
Historic Resource Evaluation – FINAL March 3, 2023

14 addition has a shed roof, while the second (southernmost) addition has a flat roof . The additions are in line with the east facade of the main house, but there is a delineation created by a trim piece between the main house and the first addition (Figure 1 5). This elevation is primarily clad with beveled siding painted white with light blue wood accents an d trim. The southernmost addition has a combination of solid wood board siding and lattice painted white.

The roof at this elevation has overhanging eaves like those found at the north elevation.

Figure 14. East elevation of 44 Sunnyside Avenue (Garavaglia Architecture, Inc., November 2022 )

13.c
Packet Pg. 381
Attachment: Historical Assessment (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue) 44 SUNNYSIDE AVENUE, CAMPBELL
Historic Resource Evaluation – FINAL March 3, 2023

15 Figure 15. Trim piece delineating the main house (right) from its first rear addition (left) at 44 Sunnyside Avenue (Garavaglia Architecture, Inc., November 2022 )

The main house has three single-hung fiberglass windows on this elevation, which are all one- over-one with white framing and light blue wood trim. The window furthest to the left (south) on the main house is smaller than the other two . The first rear addition has one one -over-one wood window with light blue framing and trims (Figure 16) similar to the one on the west elevation. The second (southernmost) rear addition does not have a window on this elevation.

13.c
Packet Pg. 382
Attachment: Historical Assessment (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue) 44 SUNNYSIDE AVENUE, CAMPBELL
Historic Resource Evaluation – FINAL March 3, 2023

16 Figure 16. View of wood window on east elevation of first rear addition at 44 Sunnyside Avenue, with second rear addition clad in solid board siding and lattice to the left (Garavaglia Architecture, Inc., November 2022)

The following original exterior building features remain at 44 Sunnyside Avenue:
• Some beveled wood siding
• Roof form
• Full-facade front porch

On the site visit on November 7, 2022, Larry Hester described some elements of the house that he had repaired or replaced during his ownership. Among these were the windows, which were all replaced with fiberglass units on the main house , as well as most of the siding. He also indicated that most of the original interior finishes and trims had been redone. 6 The only historic finishes that seem to remain are the plaster walls and wood wainscoting in the back bedroom (Figur e 17), although the flooring and window trims have been replaced.

6 Discussion between author and Larry Hester, November 7, 2022.

13.c
Packet Pg. 383
Attachment: Historical Assessment (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue) 44 SUNNYSIDE AVENUE, CAMPBELL
Historic Resource Evaluation – FINAL March 3, 2023

17 Figure 17. View of the back bedroom at 44 Sunnyside Avenue (Garavaglia Architecture, Inc., November 2022)

The main interior spaces consist of two bedrooms (one towards the front, and one towards the back), a shared bathroom, a living space, and a kitchen. The kitchen appears to be the most recently renovated room in the house with original flooring, wall finis hes, trim, and cabinetry all having been replaced (Figure 18). The rear additions appear to be used for enclosed as well as open storage space.

13.c
Packet Pg. 384
Attachment: Historical Assessment (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue) 44 SUNNYSIDE AVENUE, CAMPBELL
Historic Resource Evaluation – FINAL March 3, 2023

18 Figure 18. View of the kitchen at 44 Sunnyside Avenue (Garavaglia Architecture, Inc., April 2016 )

GARAGE
The garage is located at the southern terminus of the driveway at 44 Sunnyside Avenue , (Figure 19). The wood frame garage is rectangular in footprint, with a gable roof that is clad in dark gray composition roofing shingles matching the main house . The roof has exposed rafter tails similar to the southernmost rear addition on the main house. The garage features horizontal shiplap siding painted white . There is a six-panel person door at the center of the north elevation leading into the structure. To the ri ght of the door is a 16- panel roll-up garage door for vehicle access. To the left of the door there appears to be a window that is currently concealed by a large bush. All of the fenestration has light blue wood trim to match the main house.

Garavaglia Arc hitecture, Inc. staff was unable to access the interior of the garage at the time of the site visit on November 7, 2022.

13.c
Packet Pg. 385
Attachment: Historical Assessment (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue) 44 SUNNYSIDE AVENUE, CAMPBELL
Historic Resource Evaluation – FINAL March 3, 2023

19 Figure 19. Detached garage structure as viewed from the driveway at 44 Sunnyside Avenue, looking south (Garavaglia Architecture, Inc., April 2022)

13.c
Packet Pg. 386
Attachment: Historical Assessment (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue) 44 SUNNYSIDE AVENUE, CAMPBELL
Historic Resource Evaluation – FINAL March 3, 2023

20 HISTORICAL BACKGROUND

CAMPBELL DEVELOPMENT
Historian Glory Anne Laffey developed a document entitled Historical Overview and Context Statements for the City of Campbell in October 1996.7 It provides a good basis for understanding Campbell’s history and development and provides a contextual framework for the evaluation of potential historic resources in the area. A portion of this document is quoted below to provide overall historical background for the purposes of this review. Please see the original document for the full text.

Summary of Geographical Development
This section will review the geographical development within Campbell's downtown core and original city limits, the surrounding agricultural districts, and later suburban development outside the original city limits.

Geographer Jan Broek (1932) identified three agricultural phases through which the Santa Clara Valley passed after 1850. The first phase from 1850 to 1865 was characterized by cattle ranging, extensive wheat cultivation, and all around experimenting with crops.

During the second phase, beginning in 1865, wheat farming dominated cattle raising and the foundations were laid for specialization in horticulture. From 1875 through the 1930s, horticulture superseded the declining wheat culture, and many other forms of intensive land utilization were developed under the increasing use of irrigation. The size of the ranches in the valley were closely correlated with these changing land uses. The Mexican ranchos consisted of several thousands of unfenced acres over which cattle ranged. Early American ranchers followed the Mexican practice of free ranging their cattle for some years; however, the spread of farm enclosures an d environmental factors caused the large stock ranches to give way to more intensive land use in the form of a smaller stock breeding farms or dairy farms confined to several hundred acres. Wheat farms during this period also ranged from 100 to 500 acres i n size, averaging 213 acres in 1880. With the increasing crop value per land unit, the large farm became unnecessary.

The correlated increase in land prices, cultivation costs, and growing population led to the all around subdivision of farm lands into hig hly specialized ‘fruit ranches’ from 3 to 50 acres in size. By the 1890s, the valley ranked as one of the foremost fruit producing districts on the Pacific Coast.

Until American settlement, the Santa Clara Valley outside the settlements at the mission and the pueblo was largely undeveloped and utilized primarily for the grazing of livestock. In the late 1820s and 1830s, large tracts of land were granted by the Mexican government to California citizens. As each of these ranchos was occupied, the landowners constructed residences, laborers' housing, corrals, grist mills, tanneries, etc., in order to provide the basic needs of the rancho community. Three Mexican settlements are known to have been located within Campbell's city limits.

Farms in the Campbell a rea developed according to the land use patterns identified by

7 Glory Anne Laffey, Historical Overview and Context Statements for the Ci ty of Campbell, submitted to the Department of Community Development, Planning Division, City of Campbell, 1996, 3.

13.c
Packet Pg. 387
Attachment: Historical Assessment (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue) 44 SUNNYSIDE AVENUE, CAMPBELL
Historic Resource Evaluation – FINAL March 3, 2023

21 Broek. Early wheat farms consisted of parcels of several hundred acres. With the arrival of the railroad in 1877 and the success of early experiments in fruit packing and canning, the owners of the large wheat farms around Campbell began subdividing their properties and planting orchards by the early 1880s. Earlier farms were more widespread, and the basic farm complex consisted of a farmhouse, barn, well, windmill and water tower. As the parcel sizes decreased during the horticultural period, fruit processing buildings such as cutting sheds and sulfuring tunnels were added to the farm units.

In November 1882, Benjamin Campbell had surveyor Charles Herrmann survey his property for the Town of Ca mpbell. By 1887, the town had a railroad depot, a post office and a town hall. The first residential lot was sold in 1888; and by 1895, Campbell was a thriving village. The commercial center developed at the intersection of Campbell and Central avenues. Th e town's first industrial activities centered around the fruit industry.

Drying yards, packing houses and canneries developed in close proximity to the railroad depot. Fruit growing and fruit processing industries were the primary economic forces in the Campbell area until the early 1950s.

As drying yards and canneries closed down and their facilities were abandoned, the property was often subdivided for residential or commercial development. Likewise, orchard properties would be also be subdivided. During the first couple of decades, residential development was confined to the original survey and in adjacent areas subdivided on the edge of the village. During the 1890s, residential neighborhoods were centered on S. Second, N. Third, N. Central, N. Harrison , E. Everett, Railway, and Gilman. The first decade of the century saw residential development spread to First and N. Second streets, and Sunnyside and Rincon avenues. Also there was some early residential development on Sunnyoaks and Parr avenues during t his decade. After 1910 the village residential areas expanded to include south Third and Fourth streets, and Alice and Kennedy avenues. Outlying residential areas included Smith Avenue in the San Tomas area east of Campbell, Redding Road in the Union distr ict, and Union Avenue between Campbell Avenue and Dry Creek Road. The 1920s saw development move west along W. Campbell and Latimer avenues, north on Esther Avenue. Also in the late 1920s, there was residential construction on White Oaks Avenue in the Unio n district. In the 1930s, new subdivisions included Shelley Avenue in the Union district and Rancho Del Patio on the northeast edge of Campbell. Between 1938 and 1942, there were at least fourteen subdivision maps filed in what is now the City of Campbell.

Adjacent to Campbell's core were development north along Harrison Avenue, Rosemary Lane, the Hedegard, Bland, and Rees subdivisions east of town, and Shadyvale Court east of Bascom. Five subdivisions were located in the southwest portion of the City in the San Tomas district, i.e., Harriet Avenue, the Munro Tract, Hazelwood, the Riconada Gardens on Hacienda, and the San Tomas Acres and Parrview Tracts near the Hacienda and Winchester intersection. Following the war in the late 1940s, there were over thirty subdivisions filed. These developments were primarily located east of Winchester, as well as several near the intersection of Campbell and Bascom avenues.

By this time, the post -World War II population boom was underway and rural communities were in dang er of being swallowed by the aggressive annexation activities of San Jose and other larger cities in the county. Campbell and many of the other smaller communities across the valley incorporated. Since incorporation Campbell has annexed

13.c
Packet Pg. 388
Attachment: Historical Assessment (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue) 44 SUNNYSIDE AVENUE, CAMPBELL
Historic Resource Evaluation – FINAL March 3, 2023

22 numerous parcels as the residential development took over the surrounding orchards at a steady pace.8

Architecture and Shelter
Architecture/Shelter as a theme includes buildings representing various architectural periods and styles, structures designed by outstanding architects, and those resources that relate to residential living arrangements and landscaping.

Potential resources associated with this theme could date from the earliest settlement of the area by Sebastian Peralta, Jose Fernandez and Juan Galindo in the 1840s . American farmers began settling in the area as early as 1848, squatting on rancho lands or pre - empting homesteads. Early farm complexes consisted of simple gabled or wing -and- gable farm houses. As farmers became more prosperous in the later decades of th e century, some farmhouses began to reflect currently popular architectural styles: Gothic Revival, Italianate, and Queen Anne. These styles featured the use of elaborate wood decorations (shingles, spool work, brackets, and moldings), bay windows, and wra p- around porches.

After 1888 when the first lots were sold in the village of Campbell, the earliest residential neighborhoods developed on the old Benjamin Campbell Ranch along Campbell Avenue. Relatively modest in form, these homes also reflected the cur rently popular "Victorian" architectural styles of the late 19th century.

Around the turn -of-the century, architectural tastes were changing due to the influence of the Arts and Crafts Movement. As this was also a time of rapid growth in the town of Campbell, these early twentieth century styles are particularly characteristic of the downtown neighborhoods. Although the simple gabled structures continued in popularity, home styles began to reflect the horizontal lines of the Craftsman and Prairie styles. Simplified versions of these styles are commonly called bungalows. Interest in California’s Spanish roots was also reflected in architectural styles. Spanish Colonial and Mission Revival styles became popular in Campbell after 1915 and through the 1930 s.

Other revival styles also gained popularity during the 1920s and 1930s, especially Colonial and English Revival.

During the 19th century, some of the more prosperous farmers had homes designed by architects who had offices in San Jose; i.e . Levi Goodrich, Theodore or Jacob Lenzen, Francis Reid, or 1. O. McKee. More commonly, however, houses were designed and built by their owners with the help of a local carpenter. Some carpenters became building contractors using published house plans. Sever al of these carpenter/ contractors lived and worked in Campbell. George Whitney, known as the "Builder of Campbell," worked in Campbell from 1888 through the 1930s. Other builders were WalkerVaugh and Anthony Bargas.

Also an important representation of t his theme are the small cottages J. C. Ainsley constructed for his employees east of his cannery. There were also labor camps for the large force of seasonal workers that came to Campbell during the height of the fruit

8 Ibid., 9-14.

13.c
Packet Pg. 389
Attachment: Historical Assessment (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue) 44 SUNNYSIDE AVENUE, CAMPBELL
Historic Resource Evaluation – FINAL March 3, 2023

23 processing season. During the 1930s, migrant field workers built semi -permanent housing. Usually of flimsy construction, dwellings were constructed of whatever materials could be gathered, such as recycled fruit boxes, tar paper or newspapers.

Multi-tenant housing was not prevalent in Campbe ll until the modern period. As early as 1896, however, there were several hotels that catered to travelers and visitors. Some of the larger homes in town were converted to rooming houses that provided housing fo r seasonal workers at the canneries and packi ng houses.

Following World War II, large housing developments replaced the orchards that surrounded Campbell. Farmhouses were moved to more convenient locations or were incorporated into the development to stand beside its more modern neighbors. As the commercial and industrial land uses have expanded, older houses have been relocated out of the path of new development.
9 SITE EVOLUTION

Development of 44 Sunnyside Avenue
The Alice Avenue Historic District Context Statement was prepared by Archives & Architecture in 2003.10 This historic district lays a block to the north of the subject property at 44 Sunnyside Avenue, in the former Hyde Improvement Company-owned tract. The patterns of development identified in the Alice Avenue Historic District Contex t Statement offer context to suburban residential development in this area of Campbell at the onset of the 20 th century. The subject property at 44 Sunnyside Avenue was a part of the Sunnyside Tract , which was subdivided into housing lots in 1904 (see Figure 20).11

9 Ibid., 15-16.
10 Archives & Architecture , Alice Avenue Historic District Context Statement , submitted to the Community Development Department , Planning Division, City of Campbell, 2003. 11 Ibid., 5.

13.c
Packet Pg. 390
Attachment: Historical Assessment (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue) 44 SUNNYSIDE AVENUE, CAMPBELL
Historic Resource Evaluation – FINAL March 3, 2023

24 Figure 20. Map of the Sunnyside Tract, 1904, with subject property highlighted in yellow (courtesy of Chad Hester, amended by author )
The 1920 Sanborn map indicates that most of the lots in the Sunnyside Tract had been developed by this time (see Figure 21). At this time, the f uture subject parcel appear ed at the address of “5 Sunnyside Avenue.” The map shows the open front porch, but the two rear

13.c
Packet Pg. 391
Attachment: Historical Assessment (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue) 44 SUNNYSIDE AVENUE, CAMPBELL
Historic Resource Evaluation – FINAL March 3, 2023

25 additions were not present at this time . There was a small, detached accessory structure in the rear yard, but it is substantially smaller than the existing detached garage in terms of footprint.

It is likely that the existing garage was expanded from the footprint of the accessory structure shown in 1920.

Figure 21. Campbell Sanborn Map, 1920, with future subject property highlighted in yellow ( Campbell Express Library, amended by author)

The 1928 Sanborn map also addressed the subject property as “5 Sunnyside Avenue ” (see Figure 22). By this time, it appears that t he first addition at the rear of 44 Sunnyside Avenue had been built. The detached accessory structure is also labeled on this map as a garage.

Figure 22. Campbell Sanborn Map, 1928, with subject property highlighted in yellow ( Campbell Express Library, amended by author)

13.c
Packet Pg. 392
Attachment: Historical Assessment (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue) 44 SUNNYSIDE AVENUE, CAMPBELL
Historic Resource Evaluation – FINAL March 3, 2023

26 OWNERSHIP & CONSTRUCTION CHRONOLOGY

Ownership History
Dates Name(s) Notes
1904-1907 Leslie J. Stratton
1907-1911 Mary L. Phelps
1911 (June-July) H.I. Coleman
1911-1914 Edison Haywood Owen
1914-1925 Mary E. Owen Distributed via estate of E.H.

Owen
1925-1935 Giovanni Barbano
1935-1941 Augustine Barbano De Bernardi and
Ernestino Barbano Trustees for Giovanni Barbano
1941 (March-
April) Joseph P. Barbano
1941-1970 William A. Smith and Henrietta
Smith
Henrietta died 1965, W.A. Smith
died 1970
1970-1982 Frank Smith Distributed via estate of W.A.

Smith
1982 (January-
September)
Robin Janssen, Donald L. Janssen,
and Sandy S. McDonald
Distributed via estate of Frank
Smith
1982-1983 Sandy S. McDonald and Michael T.

McDonald
1983-1985 Darol W. Blunt and Sharon L. Blunt
1985-1986 Terry J. Stines and Carol M. Stines
1986-2020 Larry R. Hester and Jacquelyn K.

Hester
2020-2022
(October)
Chad Hester is granted one half
interest in the property
October 2022 Chad Hester is granted remaining
interest in the property

Construction Chronology
Date Alteration Source
c. 1907 House constructed 1999 DPR form
c. 1920-1928 First addition constructed Sanborn maps

13.c
Packet Pg. 393
Attachment: Historical Assessment (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue) 44 SUNNYSIDE AVENUE, CAMPBELL
Historic Resource Evaluation – FINAL March 3, 2023

27 Date Alteration Source
c. 1950s/1960s Existing garage constructed or expanded 1965 aerial; style/design 1986-2020
Various improvements made during Larry
Hester ownership period:
• New fiberglass windows on the
main house
• Siding replacements
• New copper plumbing
• New sewer line
• New flooring
• New interior finishes
• New fencing/gates
Discussion with Larry Hester
11/7/2022; letter from Chad
Hester dated 11/7/2022
1996 Upgrades to electrical service Building permit records 1998 New roofing installed Building permit records

13.c
Packet Pg. 394
Attachment: Historical Assessment (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue) 44 SUNNYSIDE AVENUE, CAMPBELL
Historic Resource Evaluation – FINAL March 3, 2023

28 Ownership and Construction Chronology Overview
The property at 44 Sunnyside Avenue has had many owners in its lifetime. The first owner was Leslie J. Stratton , who owned the land on which the Sunnyside Tract was developed in 1904.

Leslie was born in Wisconsin in 1872 and was married to a woman named Eliza.12 During his ownership of the property, Leslie worked as an orchardist and drayman , likely growing fruit trees on the land .13 In 1906, his residence was listed on Sunnyside Avenue. 14 The 1999 survey of 44 Sunnyside Avenue lists the date of const ruction for the main structure as 1907. 15

In 1907, Stratton sold the property to Mary L. Phelps. According to the 19 10 US Census, Mary Phelps, her husband, and their three children were not living at the subject property, but instead on Palm Avenue .16 It is unknown if the family resided at 44 Sunnyside Avenue prior to this. Phelps later sold the property to H.I. Coleman in 1911, but he owned it for a brief period of less than one month.

In July of 1911, the property was sold to Edison Haywood Owen. Edison was born in Mississippi in 1849 and married Mary E. (also from Mississippi) in 1866. 17 Edison died in 1913
and the property was distributed to Mary upon his death. Mary continued to live at 44 Sunnyside Avenue until 1925.

In 1925 the property was so ld to Giovanni Barbano. Upon his death in 1935, it was entrusted to Augustine Barbano De Bernardi and Ernestino Barbano . It remained in the Barbano family until Joseph P. Barbano sold it in 1941. Not much information on the family is available, but it is evident that they were orchardists who emigrated from Italy. 18 It is likely that the first addition
at the rear of 44 Sunnyside was added by the Barbano family, or the previous own er, Mary Owen, as it appears on the Sanborn maps between 1920 and 1928.

In 1941, William A. Smith and his wife, Henrietta, purchased the property. William and Henrietta were both from New York, and William worked as a machinist. 19 Henrietta died in 1965, and William died five years later in 1970. 1970, the property was distributed to William’s son, Frank, via his estate. Seven years after Frank assumed ownership, the Campbell Historic Preservation Board conducted a historic survey, documenting the subject property with a sketch and photographs (Figure 23).20 The City of Campbell does not have clear, readable copies of the photographs on file .21 The presence of the garage was noted on the survey form but was not indicated in the related sketch diagram. It is likely that the garage was constructed under Smith ownership in the 1950s or 1960s, based on the style of the building, as well as a historic aerial from 1965 (Figure 24).

12 U.S. Federal Census, 1930.
13 San Jose, California, City Directory, 1906.
14 Ibid.
15 Dill, 44 Sunnyside Avenue: DPR 523A Form , 1999.
16 U.S. Federal Census, 1910.
17 Ibid.
18 U.S. Federal Census, 1930 .
19 U.S. Federal Census, 194 0.
20 Finkbeiner, 44 Sunnyside Avenue: DPR 523A Form , 1977. 21 E-mail with Senior Planner, Daniel Fama , 2022.

13.c
Packet Pg. 395
Attachment: Historical Assessment (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue) 44 SUNNYSIDE AVENUE, CAMPBELL
Historic Resource Evaluation – FINAL March 3, 2023

29 Figure 23. 44 Sunnyside Avenue: DPR 523A Form, 1977 (City of Campbell records)

13.c
Packet Pg. 396
Attachment: Historical Assessment (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue) 44 SUNNYSIDE AVENUE, CAMPBELL
Historic Resource Evaluation – FINAL March 3, 2023

30 Figure 24. Aerial Photo with red arrow indicating the presence of the detached garage at 44 Sunnyside Avenue, May 1, 1965 (UC Santa Barbara Library Geospatial Collection , amended by author) Frank Smith owned the home for twelve years until it was distributed via his estate to Robin Janssen, Donald L. Janssen, and Sandy S. McDonald , in January of 1982 . In September of that same year, ownership passed to Sandy and Michael McDonald, who owned it for a little over a year. It is unknown if the Janssens or the McDonalds ever resided at 44 Sunnyside Avenue.

In 1983, the property was sold to Darol and Sharon Blunt, who also purchased the neighboring lot at 56 Sunnyside Avenue. Darol Blunt and a man named William Harman, acting under the corporation name B/J & A Development Co., Inc., came up with plans to demolish the buildings at 44 and 56 Sunnyside and subdivide the properties for the construction of eight new townhouses and a comm on area. A request to allow the demolition of the building at 44 Sunnyside Avenue was heard by the Campbell Historic Preservation Board on August 24, 1983 and was unanimously approved, as the board found that the building did not warrant further study.22 On March 6, 1984, the Campbell City Council adopted an ordinance to allow the construction of the eight townhouses. 23 A tentative map for the development created by Harman Associates was submitted to the Campbell Planning Commission for review at their March 13, 1984 meeting (Figure 25).24 The map was found to be in accord with the City’s

22 Historic Preservation Board, Meeting Minutes, August 24, 1983, City of Campbell. 23 City Council, Meeting Minute Action , March 6, 1984, City of Campbell. 24 Planning Commission , Meeting Minute Action , March 13, 1984, City of Campbell.

13.c
Packet Pg. 397
Attachment: Historical Assessment (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue) 44 SUNNYSIDE AVENUE, CAMPBELL
Historic Resource Evaluation – FINAL March 3, 2023

31 General Plan and was later approved by the City Council on April 3, 1984. 25 Whether for lack of funding or other issues, Blunt and Harman never moved forward with the project, and Blunt sold the property to Terry and Carol Stines in 1985. The Stines only owned the property for less than a year.

Figure 25. Tentative Map of the Sunnyside Townhouses, 1984 (City of Campbell records ) In 1986, the property was granted to Larry and Jaquelyn Hester in a foreclosure sale . When they obtained the property, there were plans and permits, which were previously approved by the Planning Commission and City Council, to develop the eight townhouses on the site. At the time of purchase, there we re also squatters on the property that had been living there for several years.26 After the squatters were vacated, Larry made several improvements to the property over his years of ownership, including the installation of new fiberglass windows on the main house, new roofing, siding replacements, new copper plumbing, a new sewer line, new flooring, new interior finishes, electrical improvements, and new fencing/gates. 27 Larry Hester indicated to the auth or that the second rear addition at 44 Sunnyside was likely installed

25 City Council, Meeting Minute Action , March 6, 1984, City of Campbell. 26 Letter from Chad Hester to author, November 7, 2022. 27 Ibid.; Discussion between author and Larry Hester, November 7, 2022.

13.c
Packet Pg. 398
Attachment: Historical Assessment (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue) 44 SUNNYSIDE AVENUE, CAMPBELL
Historic Resource Evaluation – FINAL March 3, 2023

32 without permits prior to his ownership of the property. 28 In 1997, after the Hesters had owned the property for 11 years, the City of Campbell began a survey to update their historic reso urces inventory. 44 Sunnyside Avenue was recorded on a DPR form as a part of this survey in 1999.

At the time, the recorder, Leslie A. G. Dill, described the house at 44 Sunnyside Avenue as follows:

A Neo-classical Revival residence in good condition, thi s one-story wood structure sits at the edge of a residential neighborhood adjacent to a commercial parking lot. With a symmetrically-shaped steeply-pitched hip roof covered with composition shingles, and its ridge running perpendicular to the street, the h ouse is moderately- sized and rectangular in shape with a one vehicle garage within an accessory structure at the rear.

A full-width front porch with wood floor sits within the basic building shape, and features a solid balustrade supporting four symmetrica lly placed square wood columns.

The siding is tri -beveled tear drop horizontal lap siding detailed with a water table at the floor line. The siding rises to boxed eaves terminated with small gutters. The foundation is concrete as are the front steps. The f ront door is centrally positioned at the back of the porch, and contains a large oval window. Windows are one over one double hung sash with dog ears surrounded by large flat board trim. The well -kept site is enclosed at the front with metal fencing.
29 In 2020, Larry and Jacquelyn granted partial interest in the property to their son, Chad, who was later granted full interest in October of 2022.

28 Discussion between author and Larry Hester, November 7, 2022. 29 Dill, 44 Sunnyside Avenue: DPR 523A Form , 1999.

13.c
Packet Pg. 399
Attachment: Historical Assessment (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue) 44 SUNNYSIDE AVENUE, CAMPBELL
Historic Resource Evaluation – FINAL March 3, 2023

33 EVALUATION FRAMEWORK

THE NATIONAL REGISTER CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION (NRHP)
The National Register is the nation’s master inventory of known historic resources. It is administered by the National Parks Service (NPS) in conjunction with the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO). The National Register includes listings of buildings, structures, sites, objects, and districts possessing historic, architectural, engineering, archaeological, or cultural significance at the national, state, or local levels. The National Register criteria and associated definitions are outlined in the National Register Bulletin Num ber 15: How to Apply the National Register Criteria for Evaluation. The following is quoted from National Register Bulletin 15:

Criteria
Generally, resources (structures, sites, buildings, districts, and objects) over 50 years of age can be listed in the National Register provided that they meet the evaluative criteria described below. Resources can be listed individually in the National Register or as contributors to an historic district. The National Register criteria are as follows:

A. Resources that are associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of history;

B. Resources that are associated with the lives of persons significant in our past;

C. Resources that embody the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction, or that represent the work of a master, or that possess high artistic values, or that represent a significant or distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction; or

D. Resources that have yielded or may likel y yield information important in prehistory or history.

HE CALIFORNIA REGISTER CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION
The California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR) is the official list of properties, structures, districts, and objects significant at the local , state, or national level . California Register properties must have significance under one of the four following criteria and must retain enough of their historic character or appearance to be recognizable as historical resources and convey the reasons fo r their significance (i.e. retain integrity). The California Register utilizes the same seven aspects of integrity as the National Register. Properties that are eligible for the National Register are automatically eligible for the California Register . Properties that do not meet the threshold for the National Register may meet the California Register criteria.

1. Associated with events that have made a significant contribution to broad patterns of local or regional history, or cultural heritage of California or the United States;

2. Associated with the lives of persons important to the local, California or national history

13.c
Packet Pg. 400
Attachment: Historical Assessment (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue) 44 SUNNYSIDE AVENUE, CAMPBELL
Historic Resource Evaluation – FINAL March 3, 2023

34 3. Embodies the distinctive characteristics of a design -type, period, region, or method of construction, or represents the work of a master, or possesses high artistic value; or

4. Yields important information about prehistory or history of the local area, California or the nation.

CRHR criteria are similar to National Register of Historic Places criteria, and are tied to CEQA, so any resource that meets the above criteria, and retains a sufficient level of historic integrity, is considered an histor ical resource under CEQA.

HISTORIC INTEGRITY
When evaluating a resource for the NHRP or CRHR, one must evaluate and clearly state the significance of that resource to American history, architecture, archaeology, engineering, or culture. A resource may be considered individually eligible for listing in the NRHP or CRHR if it meets one or more of the above listed criteria for significance and it possesses historic integrity. Historic properties must retain sufficient historic integrity to convey their sig nificance.

The following seven aspects define historic integrity:

• Location. The place where the historic property was constructed or the place where the historic event occurred.

• Design. The combination of elements that create the form, plan, space, struc ture, and style of a property.

• Setting. The physical environment of a historic property.

• Materials. The physical elements that were combined or deposited during a particular period of time and in a particular pattern or configuration to form a historic p roperty.

• Workmanship. The physical evidence of the crafts of a particular culture or people during any given period in history or prehistory.

• Feeling. A property’s expression of the aesthetic or historic sense of a particular period of time.

• Association. The direct link between an important historic event or person and a historic property.

To retain historic integrity, a resource should possess several of the above -mentioned aspects.

The retention of specific aspects of integrity is essential for a resource to convey its significance.

Comparisons with similar properties should also be considered when evaluating integrity as it may be important in deciding what physical features are essential to reflect the sign ificance of a historic context.

CITY OF CAMPBELL CRITERIA

13.c
Packet Pg. 401
Attachment: Historical Assessment (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue) 44 SUNNYSIDE AVENUE, CAMPBELL
Historic Resource Evaluation – FINAL March 3, 2023

35 The City of Campbell uses the following review criteria to evaluate properties for listing as historic resource inventory properties or landmarks.

1. Review criteria for historic resource inventory property or landmark. In matters where designation of a historic resource inventory property or landmark are involved, the historic preservation Board and the City Council shall consider the following criteria as guides in making its determination:
a. Historical and cultural significance.
i. It exemplifies or reflects special elements of the city's aesthetic, architectural, cultural, economic, engineering , political, or social history; ii. It is identified with persons or events significant in local, state, or federal history;
iii. It embodies distinct ive characteristics of a method, period, style, or type of construction, or is a valuable example of the use of indigenous materials or craftsmanship; or
iv. It is representative of the notable work of an architect, builder, or designer.

b. Architectural, engineering, and historical significance. i. The construction materials or engineering methods used in the proposed historic resource inventory property or landmark are unusual or significant or uniquely effective; or
ii. The overall effect of the design of the proposed historic resource inventory property or landmark is unique, or its details and materials are unique, or unusual.

c. Neighborhood and geographic setting.
i. It materially benefits the historic character of the neighborhood; ii. Its location represents an established and familiar visual feature of the neighborhood, community, or city.

13.c
Packet Pg. 402
Attachment: Historical Assessment (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue) 44 SUNNYSIDE AVENUE, CAMPBELL
Historic Resource Evaluation – FINAL March 3, 2023

36 FINDINGS

NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES/CALIFORNIA REGISTER OF HISTORICAL

RESOURCES EVALUATION
This section uses the historic information discussed above to evaluate the property at 44 Sunnyside Avenue in Campbell for historic significance. The NRHP/CRHR uses generally the same guidelines as the National Register of Historic Places (developed by the National Park Service); as such, selected language from those guidelines will be quoted below to help clarify the evaluation discussion.

To be potentially eligible for individual listing on the NRHP/CRHR, a structure must usually be more than 50 years o ld, must have historic significance, and must retain its physical integrity.

The subject building at 44 Sunnyside Avenue was constructed circa 1907 and therefore meets the age requirement. In terms of historic significance, the NRHP/CRHR evaluates a resour ce based on the following four criteria:

Criterion A/1 (event)
As stated by the National Park Service (NPS), this criterion “recognizes properties associated with single events, such as the founding of a town, or with a pattern of events, repeated activities, or historic trends, such as the gradual rise of a port city's prominence in trade and commerce.”30 When considering a property for significance under this criterion, the associated event or trends “must clearly be important within the associated context: settlement, in the case of the town, or development of a maritime economy, in the case of the port city…Moreover, the property must have an important association with the event or historic trends” 31

The arrival of the railroad in 1877 allowed for the Campbell area to become prosperous due to early experiments in fruit packing and canning, and the town’s early industrial activities revolved around the fruit industry. Residential development in the 1910s and 1920s expanded beyond the downtown core, and into lands that had previously been utilized for fruit and crop production. At the time that the Sunnyside Tract was laid out in 1904, the surrounding area was still dedicated to agricultural use. The residence at 44 Sunnyside Avenue was constructed in approximately 1907, as part of the Sunnyside Tract . The home was one of many constructed during a period of rapid s uburban development in Campbell, in other similar developments such as Hyde Residential Park and the Curtis subdivision in the immediate vicinity.

While this home does fit into the city’s early 20
th century suburban residential development
period in Campbell, the subject property itself does not have an important or distinctive association with the development pattern, a s this was one of many rural -turned-urban tracts of land, parceled down to accommodate single -family homes in the area. The Sunnyside Tract has not been identified as a significant tract with respect to the development of Campbell in the early decades of t he 20th century. As such, the property does not qualify for listing on the NRHP or the CRHR under Criterion A/1.

30 National Park Service , National Register Bulletin 15: How to Apply the National Register Criteria for Evaluation , accessed online at https://www.nps.gov/subjects/nationalregister/upload/NRB -15_web508.pdf. 31 Ibid.

13.c
Packet Pg. 403
Attachment: Historical Assessment (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue) 44 SUNNYSIDE AVENUE, CAMPBELL
Historic Resource Evaluation – FINAL March 3, 2023

37 Criterion B/2 (person)
This criterion applies to properties associated with individuals whose specific contributions to history can be identified and documented. The NPS defines significant persons as “individuals whose activities are demonstrably important within a local, state, or national historic context.

The criterion is generally restricted to those properties that illustrate (rather than commemorate) a person's important achievements. The persons associated with the property must be individually significant within a historic context.” T he NPS also specifies that these properties “are usually those associated with a person's productive life, reflecting the time period when he or she achieved significance.” 32

The earliest identified homeowner was Leslie J. Stratton , who owned the property from around 1904 through 1907 and was an orchardist . Mary J. Phelps owned the property next from 1907 until 1911. These early owners, and later subsequent owners did not appear to be recognized for their contributions within a local, state, or national historic context, nor were they found to have achieved a sufficient level of significance locally or nationally to qu alify the home for listing on the NRHP or CRHR under Criterion B/2.

Criterion C/3 (design/construction)
Under this criterion, properties may be eligible if they “embody the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction, …repres ent the work of a master, …possess high artistic values, or…represent a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction .”
33 According to the NPS, “‘Type, period, or method of construction’ refers to the way certain properties are related to one another by cultural tradition or function, by dates of construction or style, or by choice or availability of materials and technology. A structure is eligible as a specimen of its type or period of construction if it is an imp ortant example (within its context) of building practices of a particular time in history.”
34 To evaluate whether 44 Sunnyside Avenue embodies a “type, period, or method of construction,” Virginia Savage McAlester’s, A Field Guide to American Houses: The Definitive Guide to Identifying and Understanding America’s Domestic Architecture was referenced, as it discusses a variety of house types with respect to stylistic characteristics and periods of development.35 The Historical Overview and Context Statements for the City of Campbell, created in 1996, noted that simplified versions of the Arts and Crafts influenced styles, including Craftsman and Prairie style homes, created an off -shoot of simplified versions of these styles, referred to as bungalows. 36

The bungalow style was popularized in the United States during the first three decades of the twentieth century and was the dominant style for smaller houses built across the country. The style originated in southern California and was quickly spread throughout the country by

32 National Park Service , National Register Bulletin 15. 33 Ibid.
34 Ibid.
35 Virginia Savage McAlester, A Field Guide to American Houses: The Definitive Guide to Identifying and Understanding America’s Domestic Architecture (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2013), 567. 36 Laffey. Historical Overview and Context Statements for the City of Campbell, 15.

13.c
Packet Pg. 404
Attachment: Historical Assessment (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue) 44 SUNNYSIDE AVENUE, CAMPBELL
Historic Resource Evaluation – FINAL March 3, 2023

38 pattern books and magazines, which offered plans and sometimes complete pre -cut packages of lumber and detailing to be assembled by local workers. The identifying features of this style include wide eave overhangs, porches of full - or partial-width with a roof supported by square columns, and heights of one or one and one -half stories.37 The bungalow at 44 Sunnyside Avenue fits into a hipped roof subtype of the Craftsman style, which “is similar to some simple Prairie houses, which normally lack the exposed rafters and other typical Craftsman details.” 38

“During the early 20th century, the term ‘bung alow’ could refer to small one-story examples of other styles— for example, a Spanish or a Tudor bungalow.” 39 The residence at 44 Sunnyside Avenue combines some bungalow characteristics with Neoclassical Revival details. Neoclassical was a dominant style in this country from 1895 -1955, with its first wave of popularity from 1900-1920 emphasizing hipped roofs. 40 The full-facade porch— a principal subtype of the Neoclassical style :

… occupies the full width and height of the facade. Here, however, the porch is no t covered by a traditional pedimented gable but instead either by the principal (side -gable or hipped) roof or by a flat or shed extension from such a roof … examples normally have slender columns without elaborate capitals or fluted surfaces. 41

In terms of the cornice line, “Neoclassical houses usually have a boxed eave with a moderate overhang… a wide frieze band is occasionally found beneath the cornice. These are loosely based on Federal or Greek Revival precedents.” 42

The materials and methods of construction used in the building are typical of the periods it was built in, but are not exceptional in quality or execution. In addition, this circa 1907 building does not appear to embody the work of a master architect. Though the house is of notable age, it is not an exemplary type of the bungalow style in Campbell.

Based on a review of the above information, the property at 44 Sunnyside Avenue does not appear to be eligible for listing on the NRHP or on CRHR under Criterio n C/3.

Criterion D/4 (information potential)
Archival research and physical investigation of the site focused on the above ground resource only. Therefore, no informed determination could be made regarding the property’s eligibility for the CRHR under Criterion D/4.

HISTORIC INTEGRITY EVALUATION
Evaluation of potential historic resources is a two -part process. A property must meet one or more of the criteria for significance, and possesses historic integrity. Since the property (residence, land, and outbuildings) was not found to exhibit the level of significance necessary for listing on the CRHR, evaluation of the building’s integrity is unnecessary.

37 McAlester, A Field Guide to American Houses , 566-567. 38 Ibid., 568.
39 Ibid., 578.
40 Ibid., 435-438.
41 Ibid., 435-436.
42 Ibid., 436.

13.c
Packet Pg. 405
Attachment: Historical Assessment (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue) 44 SUNNYSIDE AVENUE, CAMPBELL
Historic Resource Evaluation – FINAL March 3, 2023

39 CITY OF CAMPBELL CRITERIA EVALUATION
As discussed above, the property at 44 Sunnyside Avenue does not have a significant association with Campbell’s Architecture and Shelter historical context (Criteria A/i). Further, the building is not important for association with any significant persons living at the property with or events that occurred within Campbell (Criteria A/ii). While the building does exhibit characteristics of a particular method, period, and type of construction, it is not considered to be an ‘exceptional’ example of these as this criterion would require (Criteria A/iii).

The building’s original construction materials were widely available and not unique to this structure at the time of erection (Criteria B/i). The construction methods and overall effect of the building’s design are not unique or unusual to the area, as many other higher-quality examples of this type of design exist throughout the surrounding area (Criteria B/ii).

The immediate neighborhood, the former Sunnyside Tract, has been altered from its early 19 00s character. This surrounding area includes commerci al structures, multi-family housing, properties with significant rear additions, new two -story contemporary suburban homes (Figure 26), and a few tract homes and bungalows of era as 44 Sunnyside Avenue— including a very similar style bungalow at 120 Sunnysi de Avenue (Figure 27). As such, the property does not materially benefit the historic character of the neighborhood, since the immediate surrounding neighborhood , as a whole, does not retain its 190 0s historic character (Criteria C/i). The property’s geographic location on a residential block does not necessarily represent an established or familiar visual feature of the neighborhood, community, or city, as there are many other homes throughout Campbell that are situated on this type of block (Criteria C/ii ).

The house is not immedia tely visible upon approaching Sunnyside Avenue from Winchester Boulevard. A corner lot, or possibly a lot located ac ross from a terminating street may have this quality.

Figure 26. View of new two-story houses across the street from 44 Sunnyside Avenue (Garavaglia Architecture, Inc., April 20 22)

13.c
Packet Pg. 406
Attachment: Historical Assessment (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue) 44 SUNNYSIDE AVENUE, CAMPBELL
Historic Resource Evaluation – FINAL March 3, 2023

40 Figure 27. View of 1900s bungalow -style house at 120 Sunnyside Avenue ( Google Maps Imagery , 2022)

The building does not appear to meet the threshold of significance for local historical importance. For these reasons, the property does not appear to qualify for listing as a Campbell historic resource inventory property or landmark.

CONCLUSION
In summary, the subject property at 44 Sunnyside Avenue does not display a level of hi storical significance or integrity that would qualify it for listing as a historic resource on the California Register of Historical Resources or on the National Register of Historic Places under any criteria. This particular example of a bungalow residenc e with Neoclassical detailing does not appear to be significant at the local level, as it does not possess exceptional levels of ‘historical and cultural history’ nor does it exhibit exceptional levels of ‘architectural, engineering, and historical significance’ within Campbell’s built environment.

13.c
Packet Pg. 407
Attachment: Historical Assessment (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue) 44 SUNNYSIDE AVENUE, CAMPBELL
Historic Resource Evaluation – FINAL March 3, 2023

41 REFERENCES

Ancestry.com. U.S. Federal Census Records (1910, 1930, 1940). Ancestry.com, accessed November and December 20 22.

Archives & Architecture . Alice Avenue Historic District Context Statement . Submitted to the Community Development Department . Planning Division , City of Campbell, 2003.

City of Campbell. 1997 Survey Records. On file with the City of Campbell Planning Division.

City of Campbell . List of Properties Potentially Eligible for Future Designation . https://www.campbellca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/7239/Structures -with-potential- to-be-added-to-HRI?bidId=.

City Council, Meeting Minute Action , March 6, 1984, City of Campbell.

Dill, Leslie A. G. 44 Sunnyside Avenue: DPR 523A Form . Recorded April 23, 1999. City of Campbell Survey Update, 1997.

Finkbeiner, James. 44 Sunnyside Avenue: DPR 523A Form . City of Campbell Historic Survey , 1977-1978.

Historic Preservation Board. Meeting Minutes , August 24, 1983 . City of Campbell.

Laffey, Glory Anne. Historical Overview and Context Statements for the City of Campbell , submitted to the Department of Community Development, Plann ing Division, City of Campbell, 1996.

McAlester, Virginia Savage. A Field Guide to American Houses: The Definitive Guide to Identifying and Understanding America’s Domestic Architecture. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2013.

National Park Service. National Register Bulletin 15: H ow to Apply the National Register Criteria for Evaluation. Accessed online at
https://www.nps.gov/subjects/nationalregister/upload/NRB -15_web508.pdf.

Planning Commission. Meeting Minute Action , March 13, 1984. City of Campbell.

San Jose, California . City Directory. 1906.

13.c
Packet Pg. 408
Attachment: Historical Assessment (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue) 44 SUNNYSIDE AVENUE, CAMPBELL
Historic Resource Evaluation – FINAL March 3, 2023

APPENDIX A: PARCEL MAP

13.c
Packet Pg. 409
Attachment: Historical Assessment (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue) 44 SUNNYSIDE AVENUE, CAMPBELL
Historic Resource Evaluation – FINAL March 3, 2023

APPENDIX B: SUNNYSIDE TRACT MAP, 1904

13.c
Packet Pg. 410
Attachment: Historical Assessment (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue) 44 SUNNYSIDE AVENUE, CAMPBELL
Historic Resource Evaluation – FINAL March 3, 2023

APPENDIX C: CAMPBELL SANBORN MAP, 1920

13.c
Packet Pg. 411
Attachment: Historical Assessment (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue) 44 SUNNYSIDE AVENUE, CAMPBELL
Historic Resource Evaluation – FINAL March 3, 2023

APPENDIX D: CAMPBELL SANBORN MAP, 1928

13.c
Packet Pg. 412
Attachment: Historical Assessment (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue) 44 SUNNYSIDE AVENUE, CAMPBELL
Historic Resource Evaluation – FINAL March 3, 2023

APPENDIX E: DPR 523A FORM, 1977

13.c
Packet Pg. 413
Attachment: Historical Assessment (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue) 44 SUNNYSIDE AVENUE, CAMPBELL
Historic Resource Evaluation – FINAL March 3, 2023

13.c
Packet Pg. 414
Attachment: Historical Assessment (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue) 44 SUNNYSIDE AVENUE, CAMPBELL
Historic Resource Evaluation – FINAL March 3, 2023

APPENDIX F: DPR 523A FORM, 1999

13.c
Packet Pg. 415
Attachment: Historical Assessment (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue) M. SANDOVAL ARC HITECTS, INC.

22 Sunnyside Avenue – HRE Review Memorandum
Date: 4/5/23
Page: 1

145 Corte Madera Town Center #404

Corte Madera, CA 94925

Peninsula & South Bay

Phone: 650.941.8048

San Francisco & North Bay

Phone: 415.924.7059

Napa & Sonoma

Phone: 707.637.4363

[email protected]

www.msandovalarchitects.com
Architecture .Historic Preservation .Design

MEMORANDUM

DATE: April 5, 2023

TO: Daniel Fama, Senior Planner City of Campbell
Community Development Department,

PROJECT NO: MSA-23-031501

FROM: Mark Sandoval, AIA

REGARDING: 44 Sunnyside Avenue - HRE Review Memorandum

PROJECT DOCUMENTS
• Historic Resource Evaluation (Final): Prepared by GARAVAGLIA ARCHITECTURE, INC, 582 Market St #1800, San Francisco, CA 94104, dated March 3, 2023 and consisting of 50 printed pages.

SUMMARY OF THE PROPERTY

The subject property at 44 Sunnyside Avenue (APN: 412-04-018) in Campbell, CA, is located along the south side of Sunnyside Avenue, between Winchester Boulevard and Industrial Street and sits of a 0.2-acre rectangular lot. The property consists of a one-story single-family 884-square-foot bungalow home with Neoclassical Revival characteristics, with a separate detached garage structure place at the rear southwest corner of the lot. The property is in a P-D zoning district for planned development. The building has been previously recorded on DPR forms as part of a historical survey for the City of Campbell and is not part of an existing or identified potential historic district.

CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENT RESOURCE ACT

The City of Campbell has had a long tradition of recognizing the importance of protecting the city’s important historical resources, so that they may be passed down to futures generations. The 144 structures listed currently on the city’s Historic Resource Inventory (HRI), clearly demonstrate these efforts. However, like most cities with such inventories of older structures, over time they can change, and these listings should not necessarily be considered static. Moreover, the buildings that do appear on Campbells own HRI is more like a snapshot in time, and they only represent those historical resources currently identified, to best celebrate Campbell’s unique identity, heritage, and sense of place.

Although the City of Campbell promotes the preservation of its historic resources, these protective measures actually extend beyond the local municipality’s

13.d
Packet Pg. 416
Attachment: Peer Review Memo (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue) M. SANDOVAL ARC HITECTS, INC.

22 Sunnyside Avenue – HRE Review Memorandum
Date: 4/5/23
Page: 2

145 Corte Madera Town Center #404

Corte Madera, CA 94925

Peninsula & South Bay

Phone: 650.941.8048

San Francisco & North Bay

Phone: 415.924.7059

Napa & Sonoma

Phone: 707.637.4363

[email protected]

www.msandovalarchitects.com
Architecture .Historic Preservation .Design

jurisdiction all the way to the State of California, in part by the adoption of the California Environment Resource Act (CEQA).

CEQA)is encoded in Sections 21000 et seq of the Public Resources Code (PRC), with guidelines for implementation codified in the California Code of Regulations (CCR), Title 14, Chapter 3, Sections 15000 et seq, which requires state and local public agencies to identify the environmental impacts of proposed discretionary activities or projects, determine if the impacts will be significant, and identify alternatives and mitigation measures that will substantially reduce or eliminate significant impacts to the environment. Under this code, the regulation also states that a historical resource is also recognized as part of the environment (PRC Sections 21002(b), 21083.2, and 21084.1), and the California Register is considered the authoritative guide to the state’s historical resources and, in turn, all properties that may be considered significant historically, are subject to review.

Under 21084.1. Historical Resources Guidelines it states the following:

ʺ A project that may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an historical resource is a project that may have a significant effect on the environment. For purposes of this section, an historical resource is a resource listed in, or determined to be eligible for listing in, the California Register of Historical Resources. Historical resources included in a local register of historical resources, as defined in subdivision (k) of Section 5020.1, or deemed significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (g) of Section 5024.1, are presumed to be historically or culturally significant for purposes of this section, unless the preponderance of the evidence demonstrates that the resource is not historically or culturally significant. The fact that a resource is not listed in, or determined to be eligible for listing in, the California Register of Historical Resources, not included in a local register of historical resources, or not deemed significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (g) of Section 5024.1 shall not preclude a lead agency from determining whether the resource may be an historical resource for purposes of this section. ʺ

It follows that, if a building, structure, or object meets the minimum threshold of being 50 years or older, it therefore must be evaluated to determine if it could have the potential eligibility to be listed as a historic resource in the California Register of Historic Resources (CRHR).

HISTORIC RESOURCE EVALUATION

In the Historic Resource Evaluation (HRE) for 44 Sunnyside Avenue, prepared by Garavaglia Architecture, Inc., dated March 3, 2023, the author thoroughly examines the evaluation framework and criteria used in determining what a historic resource must possess to be listed locally and on the National Register of Historic Places and the California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR). It also pointed out that, to meet this level of eligibility, a property must retain sufficient

13.d
Packet Pg. 417
Attachment: Peer Review Memo (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue) M. SANDOVAL ARC HITECTS, INC.

22 Sunnyside Avenue – HRE Review Memorandum
Date: 4/5/23
Page: 3

145 Corte Madera Town Center #404

Corte Madera, CA 94925

Peninsula & South Bay

Phone: 650.941.8048

San Francisco & North Bay

Phone: 415.924.7059

Napa & Sonoma

Phone: 707.637.4363

[email protected]

www.msandovalarchitects.com
Architecture .Historic Preservation .Design

integrity to adequately convey its historical importance as well as its significance.

In addition, its setting can also play an important factor in this final determination.

If a property individually processes the level of integrity needed to convey its historical importance and significance, even though the immediate neighborhood has radically changed over time, the property may still be found eligible as a historic resource. But, if the findings of HRE show that this older home individually does not merit even local designation, and both the homes built around the same time and the neighborhood around this property have significantly changed, then it has lost it historic value to the community. Unfortunately, 44 Sunnyside Avenue is a good example of the latter case. Although having the charm of an older small bungalow home, with the exception of the six remaining homes that are listed on Campbell’s HRI, most of the other homes built around the same time, have been substantially altered, or have been replaced with new structures. The immediate neighborhood has also substantially changed around this property and now only represent a dim reminder of what had been Sunnyside Tract’s past neighborhood context.

It is also difficult to avoid an important fact brought to surface in this document that on August 24, 1983, the Campbell Historic Preservation Board (HPB) had unanimously approved a motion stating that the structure located at 44 Sunnyside Avenue “does not warrant further study and that the applicant be allowed to either demolish or remove this structure from its present site,” which clearly demonstrates a consensus by the Board that this property was not of historical sufficient importance to be spared demolition at the time.

RECOMMENDATIONS

It is my belief based on the preponderance of evidence and sound arguments presented in the Historic Resource Evaluation prepared by Garvaglia Architecture, Inc. for 44 Sunnyside Avenue that this property does not meet the threshold of significance or does it retain the integrity necessary to qualify as a historic resource on either the California Register of Historical Resources or on the National Register of Historic Places. As a consequence, it is my recommendation that the city allow the issuance of a Demolition Permit subject to the following three conditions.

1. If directed by the City of Campbell’s Community Development Department and the Historic Preservation Board to do so, the property owner shall provide the Campbell Historical Museum with both drawings and photographic documentation of the structure prior to its demolition for archival purposes. All photographs shall be subject to the review and written approval by the Museum’s Director, and shall be in compliance with standards for archival documentation and include the following:

13.d
Packet Pg. 418
Attachment: Peer Review Memo (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue) M. SANDOVAL ARC HITECTS, INC.

22 Sunnyside Avenue – HRE Review Memorandum
Date: 4/5/23
Page: 4

145 Corte Madera Town Center #404

Corte Madera, CA 94925

Peninsula & South Bay

Phone: 650.941.8048

San Francisco & North Bay

Phone: 415.924.7059

Napa & Sonoma

Phone: 707.637.4363

[email protected]

www.msandovalarchitects.com
Architecture .Historic Preservation .Design

DRAWINGS
a. A site plan of the property as it exists, with the subject building clearly indicated, drawn to scale and with dimensions given. b. Floor and roof plans drawn to scale.
c. Building elevations scaled drawings of the exterior including notations as to the building’s construction materials.

PHOTOGRAPHS
a. Color along with black and white photographic prints (if applicable) including negatives taken with a large format camera (120 or greater) of all exterior elevations, interior rooms, and architectural details.
b. All prints shall have identification labels on the back, with the subject and date of the photo clearly expressed.
c. All photos shall be keyed to a location map indicating the direction and location of each photo.
d. Alternate Media: high resolution digital images (11 megapixels or greater), submitted on a CD-R with project information (description, location, address etc.) encrypted on the CD-R. 7. Prints must be printed on archival quality paper designed for photograph prints.

2. If any artifacts or related features are found during the demolition operation, the owner agrees to immediately notify the Museum Director to determine their suitability for salvage (for possible exhibit purposes), or to determine if any further action is required by the owner before resuming the building demolition phase of the construction work.

3. It is also recommended that the final issuance of the demolition permit not be allowed until all of the above items have been agreed to and completed. It is also imperative that proof be presented the title of the property has been properly transferred to the new owner, and the owner has secured the final approval from the city, for any new project proposed for this property. This last condition, would hopefully preclude the needless demotion of this early 20
th century constructed home if the
development project considered for 44 Sunnyside Avenue was somehow not approved by the city.

13.d
Packet Pg. 419
Attachment: Peer Review Memo (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue) 1018 LINCOLN AVENUE
SAN JOSE, CA 95125
PHONE: (650) 248-9646

13.e
Packet Pg. 420
Attachment: Project Plans (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue) 44 & 56 Sunnyside Avenue
Campbell, CA
August 09, 2023
VIEW 1 VIEW 2 VIEW 3
VIEW 4 VIEW 5 VIEW 6

KEY MAP

SUNNYSIDE AVE

13.e
Packet Pg. 421
Attachment: Project Plans (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue)

13.e
Packet Pg. 422
Attachment: Project Plans (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue)

13.e
Packet Pg. 423
Attachment: Project Plans (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue) 44 & 56 Sunnyside Avenue
Campbell, CA
August 09, 2023

13.e
Packet Pg. 424
Attachment: Project Plans (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue) 44 & 56 Sunnyside Avenue
Campbell, CA
September 15, 2023

13.e
Packet Pg. 425
Attachment: Project Plans (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue) 44 & 56 Sunnyside Avenue
Campbell, CA
August 09, 2023

FIRST FLOOR

SECOND FLOOR

THIRD FLOOR

TOTAL LIVING
ADU
2-CAR GARAGE
PORCH
ALT. ENTRY PORCH
192 SQ. FT.
1133 SQ. FT.
1134 SQ. FT.
2459 SQ. FT.
544 SQ. FT.
427 SQ. FT.
73 SQ. FT.
183 SQ. FT.

FIRST FLOOR PLAN ALT. ENTRY PLAN

OPTIONAL

FIRST FLOOR PLAN

13.e
Packet Pg. 426
Attachment: Project Plans (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue) 44 & 56 Sunnyside Avenue
Campbell, CA
August 09, 2023

SECOND FLOOR PLANTHIRD FLOOR PLAN

13.e
Packet Pg. 427
Attachment: Project Plans (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue) 5:12 5: 1 2
5: 1 2
5: 1 2
5: 1 2
5: 1 2
5: 1 25: 1 2
5: 1 2
5: 1 25: 1 2
5: 1 2
5: 1 2 5: 1 2
5: 1 2
5: 1 2
5: 1 2
5: 1 2
44 & 56 Sunnyside Avenue
Campbell, CA
August 09, 2023
LOT 1 ROOF PLANLOT 2 ROOF PLAN

ELEVATION 'A'ELEVATION 'B'

13.e
Packet Pg. 428
Attachment: Project Plans (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue) 5:12
5: 1 25: 1 2
5: 1 25: 1 2
5: 1 2 5: 1 2
5: 1 2
5: 1 2
5: 1 2
5: 1 25: 1 2
5: 1 2
5: 1 2
5: 1 2
44 & 56 Sunnyside Avenue
Campbell, CA
August 09, 2023
LOT 3 & 6 ROOF PLANLOT 4 & 5 ROOF PLAN

ELEVATION 'B'ELEVATION 'A'

13.e
Packet Pg. 429
Attachment: Project Plans (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue)

13.e
Packet Pg. 430
Attachment: Project Plans (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue)

13.e
Packet Pg. 431
Attachment: Project Plans (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue)

13.e
Packet Pg. 432
Attachment: Project Plans (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue)

13.e
Packet Pg. 433
Attachment: Project Plans (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue)

13.e
Packet Pg. 434
Attachment: Project Plans (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue)

13.e
Packet Pg. 435
Attachment: Project Plans (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue)

13.e
Packet Pg. 436
Attachment: Project Plans (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue)

13.e
Packet Pg. 437
Attachment: Project Plans (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue) 44 & 56 Sunnyside Avenue
Campbell, CA
August 09, 2023

SITE KEY
A
B

13.e
Packet Pg. 438
Attachment: Project Plans (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue)

13.e
Packet Pg. 439
Attachment: Project Plans (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue)

13.e
Packet Pg. 440
Attachment: Project Plans (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue)

13.e
Packet Pg. 441
Attachment: Project Plans (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue) 44 SUNNYSIDE, LLC

13.e
Packet Pg. 442
Attachment: Project Plans (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue) 44 SUNNYSIDE, LLC

13.e
Packet Pg. 443
Attachment: Project Plans (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue) 44 SUNNYSIDE, LLC

13.e
Packet Pg. 444
Attachment: Project Plans (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue) 44 SUNNYSIDE, LLC

13.e
Packet Pg. 445
Attachment: Project Plans (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue) 44 SUNNYSIDE, LLC

13.e
Packet Pg. 446
Attachment: Project Plans (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue) 44 SUNNYSIDE, LLC

13.e
Packet Pg. 447
Attachment: Project Plans (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue) 44 SUNNYSIDE AVENUE
3 STORY SINGLE FAMILY HOMES
44 SUNNYSIDE AVENUE

CAMPBELL, CALIFORNIA

L A N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T U R E
IDLA, INC.

California Landscape Architect #4122
ID #LA-16771 * HI #LA-16112
AZ #76633
P.O.BOX 170129
Boise, Idaho 83717
[email protected]
(208) 906-1300

SHEET ISSUANCE
0 SCALE:
feet10 20 30
1" = 10'

EXISTING TREE TO BE
REMOVED, TYP.

TREES BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE QTY
Acer palmatum 'Sango-kaku' Coral Bark Japanese Maple 15 gal. 5 Lophostemon confertus 'Variegata' Variegated Brisbane Box 24" BOX 4

OR CITY APPROVED STREET TREE

SHRUBS BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE QTY
Mahonia repens Creeping Mahonia 1 gal. 48
Nandina domestica 'Gulf Stream' Gulf Stream Heavenly Bamboo 5 gal. 49 Prunus caroliniana `Compacta` Compact Carolina Cherry Laurel 15 gal. 30

PERENNIALS BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE QTY
Dietes vegeta African Iris 1 gal. 26
Teucrium x lucidrys prostratum Germander 1 gal. 30
Tulbaghia violacea Society Garlic 1 gal. 36

STORM WATER MANAGEMENT PLANTINGS BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE QTY Carex barbarae Santa Barbara Sedge 1 gal. 94
Juncus patens `Carman`s Grey` Spreading Rush 1 gal. 42

GROUND COVERS BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE SPACING QTY MIXED SUCCULENTS SUCCULENTS 4" 12" o.c. 195 sf

MATERIALS BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE SPACING QTY
2" DEPTH 1-1/2" DRAIN ROCK DG --- 1,660 sf

PLACE OVER LANDSCAPE FABRIC
2023-07-06 10:05

PLANT SCHEDULE

1. general notes:

2. Street trees shown in the public right-of-way are for information only. The Planning Permit does not authorize the installation or removal of trees in the public right of way. Actual street tree location will be determined by Public Works at the implementation stage on the Public Improvement plan. The installation or removal of the street trees requires a permit from the Department of Transportation. The City Arborist will specify the species

3. storm water treatment planters are to Include 3 inches of composted, non-floatable mulch in areas between storm water treatment plantings and side slopes

4. The project proposes to plant (9) new 24-inch box trees and (2) 15-gallon size trees for a total
of 11) trees, to meet the mitigation requirement.

PLAN NOTES:

A. storm water treatment planter location. refer to the civil eng dwgs. see note 'b' this sheet
B. EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVED, TYP.

C. NEW STREET TREE. REFER TO NOTE 'A' THIS SHEET
D. 8' X 12' PERVIOUS PAVER PATIO

SHRUB PLANTING

TREE PLANTING

TREE ROOT BARRIER
amended backfill
50% site soil, 50% compost
dig only the depth of rootball
3 times width of root ball
rootball - set rootball 1" above
-cut to within 3" of tree ties
tree stakes - 2 per tree
fertilizer tablets per
Mfgr. directions
Note: Tree stakes and ties
shall be as per the
Landscape Specifications
Tree ties – cinch ties or equal. Min. 2
points of attachment
Tree to be planted 1" above grade
soil ring
Mulch to
be applied
in tree
well per
Landscape
specification
NORTH
A A
A A
A A
B
B
B
B
B
B
D
D
D D
D
D

C C C C
L1

PLANTING PLAN

EXISTING REDWOOD

TREES TO REMAIN

08.11.23 13.e
Packet Pg. 448
Attachment: Project Plans (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue) POC 1 POC 2
POC 3 POC 4
POC 5 POC 6
id
id
id
id
id
id
id
id
id id
id
id
id
id
id
id
id
id
id
id
id
id
id
id
idid
3 4"
3 4"3 4"
3 4"
3 4"
3 4"3 4"
3 4" 3 4"
3 4" 3 4"
3 4" 3 4" 3 4" 3 4"
3 4"
3 4"
3 4"
3 4"
3 4"
1" 1"
1" 1"
1" 1"
A
B
C
D
E
F
A1
31"
A2

1.163 4"
A3

1.733 4"
A4

2.993 4"
B1
11"
B2

3.673 4"
B3

1.23 4"
C1
11"
C2

3.843 4"
C3

1.233 4"
D1
31"
D2

1.693 4"
D3

3.013 4"
D4

1.173 4"
E1
11"
E2

3.493 4"
E3

1.223 4"
F1
11"
F2

3.863 4"
F3

1.213 4"
44 SUNNYSIDE AVENUE
3 STORY SINGLE FAMILY HOMES
44 SUNNYSIDE AVENUE

CAMPBELL, CALIFORNIA

L A N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T U R E
IDLA, INC.

California Landscape Architect #4122
ID #LA-16771 * HI #LA-16112
AZ #76633
P.O.BOX 170129
Boise, Idaho 83717
[email protected]
(208) 906-1300

SHEET ISSUANCE
0 SCALE:
feet10 20 30
1" = 10'
NORTH L2

IRRIGATION PLAN

SYMBOL MANUFACTURER/MODEL/DESCRIPTION PSI
Hunter RZWS-18-CV
18in. long RZWS with installed .25 gpm or
.50 gpm bubbler options, Check Valve,
1/2in. swing joint for connection to 1/2in.
pipe
30 SYMBOL MANUFACTURER/MODEL/DESCRIPTION
Hunter ACZ-075-25
Drip control kit featuring a 3/4in.

PGV-ASV valve, with 3/4in. HY075 filter
system, and 25psi pressure regulated.

Flow range: 0.5 GPM to 15 GPM. With 150
mesh stainless steel screen.

Pipe Transition Point above grade
Pipe transition point from PVC lateral
to drip tubing with riser to above
grade installation.

Hunter ECO-ID-12
ECO-ID: 1/2in. FPT connection with 15 psi -
100 psi operating pressure. Specify
with Hunter SJ swing joint.

Area to Receive Dripline
Hunter ECO-WRAP-17

0.6GPH fleece wrapped inline emitter
tubing, without the blanket Eco-Mat.

Evenly disperses water from under the
surface. Emitters at 12" O.C. Dripline
laterals spaced at 12" apart, with
emitters offset for triangular pattern.

Specify PLD-LOC fitting.

Area to Receive Dripline
Hunter HDL-06-12-CV
HDL-06-12-CV: Hunter Dripline w/ 0.6 GPH
emitters at 12" O.C. Check valve, dark
brown tubing with gray striping.

Dripline laterals spaced at 12" apart,
with emitters offset for triangular
pattern. Install with Hunter PLD barbed
or PLD-LOC fittings.

SYMBOL MANUFACTURER/MODEL/DESCRIPTION
Hunter PGV-ASV tree valve
3/4in. and 1in. Plastic Electric Remote
Control Valve, with removable
Anti-Siphon Cap, and Flow Control, for
Residential Use. Inlet/Outlet: Female NPT
Threads.

Hunter HC-6
6 station controller with Wi-Fi
connection
Hunter HC-6
6 station controller with Wi-Fi
connection
Hunter HC-6
6 station controller with Wi-Fi
connection
Hunter HC-6
6 station controller with Wi-Fi
connection
Hunter HC-6
6 station controller with Wi-Fi
connection
Hunter HC-6
6 station controller with Wi-Fi
connection
3/4" TEE OFF DOMESTIC SUPPLY
3/4" TEE OFF DOMESTIC SUPPLY
3/4" TEE OFF DOMESTIC SUPPLY
3/4" TEE OFF DOMESTIC SUPPLY
3/4" TEE OFF DOMESTIC SUPPLY
3/4" TEE OFF DOMESTIC SUPPLY
Irrigation Lateral Line: PVC Schedule 40
Irrigation Mainline: PVC Schedule 40
2023-07-06 09:28

0.25 0.50
id
A
B
C
D
E
F
POC 1
POC 2
POC 3
POC 4
POC 5
POC 6
Valve Number
Valve Flow
Valve Size
Valve Callout
#
##"

IRRIGATION SCHEDULE
NUMBER MODEL SIZE TYPE GPM PSI PSI @ POC PRECIP
A1 Hunter PGV-ASV tree valve 1" Bubbler 3 32.4 32.6 2.42 in/h A2 Hunter ACZ-075-25 3/4" Area for Dripline 1.16 27.3 27.5 0.96 in/h A3 Hunter ACZ-075-25 3/4" Area for Dripline 1.73 28.0 28.2 0.96 in/h A4 Hunter ACZ-075-25 3/4" Area for Dripline 2.99 29.1 29.4 0.97 in/h B1 Hunter PGV-ASV tree valve 1" Bubbler 1 31.1 31.3 2.59 in/h B2 Hunter ACZ-075-25 3/4" Area for Dripline 3.67 30.0 30.2 0.97 in/h B3 Hunter ACZ-075-25 3/4" Area for Dripline 1.2 27.4 27.6 0.96 in/h C1 Hunter PGV-ASV tree valve 1" Bubbler 1 31.1 31.3 2.49 in/h C2 Hunter ACZ-075-25 3/4" Area for Dripline 3.84 30.2 30.4 0.96 in/h C3 Hunter ACZ-075-25 3/4" Area for Dripline 1.23 27.4 27.6 0.96 in/h D1 Hunter PGV-ASV tree valve 1" Bubbler 3 32.4 32.6 2.48 in/h D2 Hunter ACZ-075-25 3/4" Area for Dripline 1.69 28.0 28.2 0.96 in/h D3 Hunter ACZ-075-25 3/4" Area for Dripline 3.01 29.2 29.5 0.96 in/h D4 Hunter ACZ-075-25 3/4" Area for Dripline 1.17 27.3 27.5 0.97 in/h E1 Hunter PGV-ASV tree valve 1" Bubbler 1 31.1 31.3 2.59 in/h E2 Hunter ACZ-075-25 3/4" Area for Dripline 3.49 29.9 30.1 0.96 in/h E3 Hunter ACZ-075-25 3/4" Area for Dripline 1.22 27.4 27.6 0.96 in/h F1 Hunter PGV-ASV tree valve 1" Bubbler 1 31.1 31.3 2.51 in/h F2 Hunter ACZ-075-25 3/4" Area for Dripline 3.86 30.2 30.4 0.96 in/h F3 Hunter ACZ-075-25 3/4" Area for Dripline 1.21 27.4 27.6 0.96 in/h 2023-07-06 09:31

VALVE SCHEDULE

MWELO WATER USE CALCULATIONS

08.11.23 13.e
Packet Pg. 449
Attachment: Project Plans (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue) 44 SUNNYSIDE AVENUE
3 STORY SINGLE FAMILY HOMES
44 SUNNYSIDE AVENUE

CAMPBELL, CALIFORNIA

L A N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T U R E
IDLA, INC.

California Landscape Architect #4122
ID #LA-16771 * HI #LA-16112
AZ #76633
P.O.BOX 170129
Boise, Idaho 83717
[email protected]
(208) 906-1300

SHEET ISSUANCE
L3

REDUCED PRESSURE TYPE BPD

HDL CONNECTION DETAIL

GATE VALVE
MF
MF
MF

HDL ISLAND LAYOUT

HDL IRREGULAR AREAS HDL TRIANGULAR AREAS
MF
MF

HDL CENTER FEED LAYOUT

DRIP TUBING LINE FLUSHING VALVE
OI
OI
OI

REMOTE CONTROL VALVE
10 11
13 5
7 3
12 6
3 1
13 4 5 77
2 12
6 9
1 8
13 4
9 7
8 10
11 12
13 2
HC-075 FLOW METER (3/4")
HUNTER HC FLOW METER HC-150 WITH UNION

CONNECTIONS
SCH 80 PVC FEMALE ADAPTER (S X T)

RECTANGULAR VALVE BOX PER SPECIFICATIONS
SCH 80 PVC 45 DEGREE ELBOW (S X S) TO LOWER

MAIN LINE TO PROPER DEPTH (SIZE FOR LARGER

MAIN LINE AS NEEDED)
SCH 80 PVC 45 DEGREE ELBOW (S X S) TO LOWER

MAIN LINE TO PROPER DEPTH
2" DIA. (50 mm) MAIN LINE AT INLET & OUTLET
DETAIL LEGEND:

TOP VIEW

SIDE VIEW
FLOW

FLOW METER SPECIFICATIONS
NOTE: INLET PIPE ENTERING METER:

LENGTH MUST BE A MIN. OF 10 X
PIPE DIA.

OUTLET PIPE LEAVING METER:

LENGTH MUST BE MIN. OF 5 X PIPE
DIA.

INLET AND OUTLET PIPE MUST BE

STRAIGHT PIPE WITH NO FITTINGS OR

TURNS UNTIL AFTER THESE SPECIFIED
LENGTHS. PIPE AND FITTINGS MAY
BE SCH 80 PVC SOLVENT WELD,
THREADED SCH 80 PVC OR BRASS,
AS REQUIRED FOR PROJECT.
10 x PIPE DIA. 5 x PIPE DIA.

MAIN LINE TO SYSTEM (SEE LEGEND AND PLANS FOR

TYPE AND SIZE)

TWO WIRES TO FLOW SENSOR TERMINALS AT
CONTROLLER. MIN. 18 AWG-UF (2.08 mm2) SHIELDED

WIRE WITH DIFFERENT COLOR FROM
CONTROL/COMMON WIRE.

WEATHERPROOF WIRE CONNECTOR

FINISH GRADE

SPECIFIED SOIL COVER (SEE LEGEND)

COMMON BRICK
GRAVEL BASE, 6" (15 cm) DEEP

IRRIGATION CONTROLLER

SOLAR SYNC WEATHER SENSOR
1 2
3 4
5 6

QUICK COUPLER VALVE

NOT TO SCALE

HUNTER REMOTE CONTROL

VALVE (PCZ) WITH FILTER

REGULATOR
IRRIGATION VALVE BOX: HEAT
STAMP LID WITH 'RCV' IN 2"

LETTERS
WATERPROOF CONNECTORS (2)
18"-24" COILED WIRE TO

CONTROLLER

FINISH GRADE AT ADJACENT

SURFACE (TURF OR MULCH)
SCH. 80 CLOSE NIPPLE, MATCH

SIZE TO VALVE

PVC SLIP X FPT UNION

ISOLATION VALVE, SIZE AND TYPE

PER PLAN
BRICK SUPPORTS (4)

FILTER FABRIC - WRAP TWICE

AROUND BRICK SUPPORTS
3/4" WASHED GRAVEL - 4" MIN.

DEPTH

IRRIGATION LATERAL

MAINLINE LATERAL AND FITTINGS
LEGEND
MIN. 1"
CLR.

DRIP CONTROL ZONE KIT (PCZ-101-LF)
1 4
5 1
2 3
NOTE:

CONTROLLER SHALL

BE HARD-WIRED TO

GROUNDED
110 VAC POWER
SOURCE
4 LEGEND:

IRRIGATION

CONTROLLER
(ACC2-PED) PER
PLAN

IRRIGATION

CONTROL WIRE IN

CONDUIT

SIZE AND TYPE PER

LOCAL CODES

ELECTRICAL SUPPLY

CONDUIT

CONNECT TO POWER

SOURCE, J-BOX

INSIDE CONTROLLER
5 PEDESTAL BASE

PER PLAN INSURE

POSITIVE DRAINAGE

AWAY FROM

PEDESTAL
3 2

GROUND WIRE

CONDUIT

GROUND PER ASIC

GUIDELINES
16" (40.7 CM) OPEN DOOR WIDTH

ROOT WATERING ZONE DETAIL
1 LEGEND:
18" ROOT ZONE WATERING SYSTEM PER PLAN
2 3
MULCH
7 NATIVE SOIL

FINISHED GRADE
4 LATERAL PIPE - SIZE PER PLAN
6 5 ROOT BALL
NOTES

INSTALL RZWS SLEEVE OVER TUBE TO HELP

PREVENT SOIL INTRUSION
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 AMENDED SOIL MEDIA (PER SOILS REPORT)

LANDSCAPE DETAILS

13.e
Packet Pg. 450
Attachment: Project Plans (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue) 44 SUNNYSIDE AVENUE
3 STORY SINGLE FAMILY HOMES
44 SUNNYSIDE AVENUE

CAMPBELL, CALIFORNIA

L A N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T U R E
IDLA, INC.

California Landscape Architect #4122
ID #LA-16771 * HI #LA-16112
AZ #76633
P.O.BOX 170129
Boise, Idaho 83717
[email protected]
(208) 906-1300

SHEET ISSUANCE
L4
SECTION 02810

IRRIGATION SYSTEM
PART 1 - GENERAL
For the purpose of these specifications, the Owner's Representative shall be defined as the Landscape Architect, The Project Superintendant, and or the Architect.

1.01 SECTION INCLUDES
A. The work included under this Section consists of furnishing all fees and permits, all labor, tools, materials, equipment, transportation, and services required to complete the installation of the Underground Sprinkler Irrigation system, including revisions to existing systems, as shown on the Drawings and as specified in this section.

B. Related Sections:

1. Section 2900 - Planting: Provision of requirements for fine grading of planting areas.

1.02 REFERENCES
A. National Electric Code (NEC).

B. Uniform Plumbing Code (UPC).

C. Underwriters Laboratories Inc. (UL):

1. BMD - Building Materials Directory.

1.03 QUALITY ASSURANCE
A. All work and materials shall be in full accordance with the latest rules and regulations of the National Electric Code, the Uniform Plumbing Code, and other applicable State or local laws or regulations. Nothing in these Drawings or Specifications is to be construed to permit work not conforming to these Codes.

B. When the Specifications call for materials or construction of a better quality or larger size than required by the above mentioned rules and regulations, the provision of the Specifications shall take precedence over the requirements of the said rules and regulations.

C. The Contractor shall furnish, without any extra charge, any additional material and labor when required by the compliance mentioned on these particular Specifications or shown on the Drawings.

D. The Contractor shall erect and maintain barricades, guards, warning signs, and lights as necessary or required by OSHA regulations and as required by these contract documents for the protection of the public or workmen.

E. Any existing buildings, equipment, piping, sewers, sidewalks, landscaping or other Site improvements damaged by the Contractor during the course of his work shall be replaced or repaired by the Contractor in a manner satisfactory to the Owner's representative and at the Contractor's own expense, and before the final payment is made. The Contractor shall be responsible for damage caused by leaks in the piping systems being installed or having been installed by him. He shall repair, at his own expense, all damage so caused, in a manner satisfactory to the Owner's representative.

F.Installing company and its job site superintendent shall have at least 3 years immediate and continuous experience installing systems of similar design and type of equipment.

G. The Contractor shall obtain and pay all fees, licenses, and permits required for the Project.

H. Before making bid, examine the Site carefully, verifying dimensions and other Site conditions in relation to the Plans. The Contractor is responsible for informing himself of all conditions under which work is to be done before submitting his bid.

I. In case of an apparent discrepancy among Drawings, Specifications, and actual Site conditions, bring the discrepancy to the attention of the Owner's Representative or Architect, in writing.

J. Attend pre-construction conferences, if requested to do so.

1.04 PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS
A. Sprinkler System:

1. Construct sprinkler system to sizes, grades, and locations indicated on the Drawings.

2. Sprinkler lines indicated on the Drawings are essentially diagrammatic.

3. Establish exact locations of sprinkler heads, shrub heads, and similar type items, at time of construction.

4. Do not exceed typical spacings of sprinkler heads indicated on the Drawings.

1.05 SUBMITTALS
A. Submit and cut sheets provide for all irrigation system components.

B. Record Drawings

1. The Contractor shall maintain, in good order, in the field office, one complete Set of Sprinkler Drawings showing all water lines, sprinklers, valves, controllers, stub-outs, and sleeves. In the event any work is not installed as indicated on the Drawings, such work shall be immediately corrected and dimensioned accurately from the building walls on these Record Drawings.

2. All underground stub-outs and sleeves for future connections shall be located and dimensioned accurately from the building walls on these Record Drawings.

3. Upon completion of the work, and prior to final acceptance, the Contractor shall obtain a duplicate vellum from the Owner's representative and neatly correct the vellum to show the 'As Built' conditions. Furnish these corrected vellums to the Owner's Representative.

C. Contract Closeout Submittals:

1. Submit to Owner's Representative

2. Project Record Documents:
a. After final acceptance of project, turn over record documents to the Owner's Representative.

3. Operation and Maintenance: Provide operation and maintenance manuals covering the system and its components.

4. Provide Owner's Representative with detailed typewritten instructions for Winter and Summer controller programming, including demonstration for Owner's maintenance personnel.

Give controller instruction booklet to the Owner's Representative.

1.06 DELIVERY, STORAGE AND HANDLING
A. Packing and Shipping:

1. Deliver plastic pipe, fittings, and connectors to project site in unbroken bundles or rolls, packaged in such manner as to provide adequate protection for pipe ends, threaded or plain.

B. Storage and Protection

1. During construction and storage protect materials from damage and prolonged exposure to sunlight, excessive heat, and/or deleterious materials.

1.07 JOB CONDITIONS
A. Proceed with and complete irrigation work as rapidly as portions of Site become available, working within seasonal limitations.

B. Determine location of underground utilities and perform work in a manner which will avoid possible damage. Hand excavate as required.

C. Maintain grade stakes set by others until removal is mutually agreed on by parties concerned.

D. Make field measurements necessary to lay out work.

1.08 SUBSTITUTION AND VERIFICATION
A. Certain numbers on the Drawings and the Specifications are taken from the catalogues of the manufacturers named. The Contractor shall be responsible for verifying that listed numbers correspond to appropriate equipment currently available from the manufacturers.

B. Numbers on the Drawings refer to the basic equipment required and the Contractor shall be responsible for determining additional incidental parts necessary for the attachment or assembly of equipment within the system.

C. Requests for substitutes must be in writing and approved of by the Owner's Representative.

1.09 SEQUENCING AND SCHEDULING
A. Closing in Uninspected Work:

1. Do not allow nor cause any work to be covered or enclosed until it has been inspected, tested, and accepted by the Owner's Representative.

2. Should any work be enclosed or covered before such inspection and test, uncover such work at no additional cost to the Contract.

PART 2 - PRODUCTS

2.01 PVC PLASTIC PIPING AND FITTINGS
A. Exterior main lines (pressure lines): All main line piping is to be PVC SCH40 (ASTM 01784) plastic pipe. Use Type 1 Schedule 40 High Impact PVC solvent weld fittings.

B. Exterior lateral lines (non-pressure) shall be PVC Schedule 40 (ATM D 1785) plastic pipe with Type 1 Schedule 40 High Impact PVC solvent weld fittings.

C. Connections between mainlines and RCV's shall be of Schedule 80 PVC nipples and fittings as per Detail on Plan.

D. Plastic to metal connections shall be made with Schedule 80 male adapter or threaded nipple.

E. Plastic saddles and flange type fittings are not to be used.

2.02 GALVANIZED STEEL PIPE AND FITTINGS
A. Steel pipe shall be standard weight Schedule 40 as specified in Section 15252, mild steel pipe of domestic origin, galvanized, and shall be new and scale free. All nipples shall be of the same material.

B. Steel pipe fittings shall be heavy pattern, banded, galvanized malleable iron, threaded pipe fittings.

C. Nipples are to be of same material as pipe.

D. Crosses, bushings, and close nipples are not to be used.

E. All galvanized steel pipe and fittings occurring below grade, including to 6 inches above finish grade, are to be field wrapped with a PVC tape. The wrapping tape and technique are to be subject to Owner's Representative approval.

F. All dissimilar metal piping are to be joined with a dielectric fitting.

2.03 SLEEVES AND CHASES
A. All irrigation pipe sleeves and/or electrical chases shall be PVC Schedule 40 (ASTM D 1785).

Size as required.

B. Class 1 and Class 2 electrical conductors are not to be placed in the same conduit.

2.04 SPRINKLER SYSTEM EQUIPMENT
A. The backflow prevention assembly, automatic sprinkler controller, control valves, and other miscellaneous equipment shall be as specified on the Plans and/or in the Sprinkler System Legend.

A. Sprinkler Heads:

1. Type and Sizes: Provide types and sizes with diameter (or radius) of throw, pressure, discharge, and any other designations as indicated on the Drawings.

2. For Each Particular Type: Provide from same manufacturer and mark with manufacturer's name and identification in such position that they can be identified without removing the sprinkler from the system.

B. Sprinkler Risers:

1. Rotor Pop-up Sprinklers: Are to have adjustable assembly (double swing joint) risers as indicated on the Drawings.

2. Stationary Pop-up Sprinklers: Are to have swing joint risers or as indicated on the Drawings.

2.05 CONTROL WIRE
A. Control wire shall be type UF, 600 volt, single conductor wire with PVC insulation 4\64 inches thick (minimum). Control wire shall be #14 single conductor solid copper wire. All control or 'hot' wires shall be of one color (RED) and all common or 'ground' wires shall be (WHITE). Common ground wires size shall be #12 single conductor.

B. Electrical wire connections shall be made with 3M Brand DBY Direct Bury Splice Kit. The electrical connector shall be a 'Scotchlok' DBY. The device shall be installed per manufacture’s instructions and all applicable codes. The device shall be UL Listed as a Wire Connector System For Use With Underground Conductors.

2.06 AUTOMATIC CONTROLLER
A. Provide and install automatic irrigation controller in approximate location shown on the Drawings. The exact location will be determined on the Site by the Owner's Representative.

2.07 BACKFLOW PREVENTERS
A. Backflow prevention devices are to be installed as per plan details and specifications.

Verify point of connection size and location in field. Contact Owner's Representative if contrary to plan.

2.08 VALVE BOXES
B. Valve boxes shall be Carson #1419-13 and Drip Zone valve boxes shall be Carson #1220 Jumbo Valve Box & Lid as manufactured by Carson Industries, Inc. and are to have bolt down lids, with bolts, with "RCV" cast on lid.

C. Install only one RCV or gate valve per valve box.

D. Install all valve boxes on a 6" pea gravel base.

2.09 MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS
A. PVC pipe connections: Solvent cement and primer for solvent weld joints shall be of make and type approved by manufacturer of pipe and fittings. Cement shall be maintained at proper consistency throughout use.

B. Galvanized pipe connections: Pipe joint compound shall be 'Rectorseal' or equivalent, non-hardening, non-toxic material designed specifically for use on threaded connections in water-carrying pipe.

C. PVC threaded connections: Use Teflon tape or approved equal.

D. Provide the Owner, at completion of the maintenance period, three each of all operating and servicing keys, wrenches, and adjustment screwdrivers required for complete maintenance and operation of all heads and valves. Include all wrenches necessary for complete disassembly of all heads and valves.

PART 3 - EXECUTION

3.01 SUPERVISION AND WORKMANSHIP
A. The Contractor, personally or through an authorized and competent representative, shall supervise the work constantly and shall, as far as possible, keep the same foreman and workmen on the job from commencement to completion. The workmanship of the entire job shall in every way be first class, and only experienced and competent workmen shall be allowed on the job.

3.02 LAYOUT OF THE WORK
A. Stake out the irrigation system as shown on the Drawings. Any necessary changes from the original system shall be determined at this time. Verify location of existing underground utilities and make any necessary adjustments to avoid damage.

3.03 INSTALLATION PREPARATION
A. Schedule and coordinate placement of materials and equipment in a manner to complete the work as quickly as possible in conformance with construction and progress schedules.

B. Handling and Storage

1. Protect work and materials from damage during construction and storage.

2. Plastic pipe shall be handled carefully and protected from prolonged exposure to sunlight.

3. Grade areas to be irrigated to final contours before installation of irrigation system.

3.04 COORDINATION OF WORK
A. Coordinate work with other trades. In particular, schedule placement of irrigation and wiring (Schedule 40) sleeves prior to paving work.

3.05 EXCAVATING, TRENCHING AND BACKFILL
A. Excavation and Backfill for Sprinkler Lines:

1. Excavation:
a. General: Place when pipe and soil temperatures are approximately the same.

2. Backfill:

3. Compaction:
a. Top 6 inches in landscaped areas may be 85 percent.

LANDSCAPE

SPECIFICATIONS

13.e
Packet Pg. 451
Attachment: Project Plans (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue) 44 SUNNYSIDE AVENUE
3 STORY SINGLE FAMILY HOMES
44 SUNNYSIDE AVENUE

CAMPBELL, CALIFORNIA

L A N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T U R E
IDLA, INC.

California Landscape Architect #4122
ID #LA-16771 * HI #LA-16112
AZ #76633
P.O.BOX 170129
Boise, Idaho 83717
[email protected]
(208) 906-1300

SHEET ISSUANCE
L5

LANDSCAPE

SPECIFICATIONS
B. Excavation shall be in all cases ample space for joining. Provide warning signs and barricades as needed for open trenches. Bottom of trenches shall provide continuous support for pipe.

C. Make trenches for pipe lines deep enough to provide minimum cover from finish grade as follows:

1. 18 inches minimum cover over main lines to control valves and quick coupler valves, 24 inches under paving.

2. 18 inches minimum cover over control wires from controller to valves. 24 inches under paving.

3. 16 inches minimum cover over valve-controlled rotary sprinkler lateral lines. 24 inches under paving.

4. 12 inches minimum cover over valve controlled spray sprinkler lateral lines. 24 inches under paving.

5. When rocky conditions exist, as determined by the Owner's Representative, the bottom of all trenches shall have 3 inches of sand placed in them. Trenching depth shall be sufficient to allow for the 3 inches of bedding sand.

D. Restore surfaces, existing underground installations, or other Site improvements damaged or cut as a result of excavations, to original condition in a manner approved by the Owner's Representative.

E. Where other utilities interfere with irrigation trenching and pipe work, adjust the trench depth as instructed by the Owner's Representative.

F. No work on excavating, trenching, or backfilling shall be done when soil is muddy, as determined by the Owner's Representative.

3.06 PIPELINE ASSEMBLY / PLASTIC PIPE
A. All pipe shall be assembled free from dirt. Field cut ends shall be reamed only to full diameter, with rough edges and burrs removed.

B. Solvent weld joints: Assemble PVC pipe using primer, solvents, and methods in accordance with manufacturer's recommendations. Wipe excess cement off the outside of the joints.

C. For long pipe runs, 'snake' pipe from side to side in trench to allow for thermal expansion.

Install pipe with manufacturer's labels face up for inspection before backfill. ` D. THREADED JOINTS

1. Field threading of plastic pipe or fittings is not permitted, factory formed threads only will be permitted.

2. All plastic to metal connections shall be made with PVC male adapters. All screwed joints shall have teflon tape applied to the male threads.

3. Where assembling threaded plastic fittings, take up joint no more than one full turn beyond hand tight. Use strap-eye friction wrench only; do not use metal jawed wrench.

E. Cap or plug openings as pipeline is assembled to prevent entrance of dirt or obstruction.

Remove caps or plugs only when necessary to continue assembly.

F. Where pipes or control wires pass through sleeves, provide removable non-decaying seal at ends of sleeve to prevent entrance of earth.

G. Install concrete thrust blocks on the main line at all changes in pipe direction associated with PVC tee's, el's, and other fittings as needed and as per detail on the plans. Do not cover thrust blocks until fully acceptable to the Owner's Representative.

3.07 REMOTE CONTROL VALVES (RCV)
A. Install where shown and group together where practical. Limit one RCV per valve box. Locate in shrub or ground cover beds wherever possible.

B. The valve designation (i.e.: controller and station no.) shall be painted on the inside of each valve box lid.

C. Locate valves no closer than 12 inches from pavement or curbs, buildings, and walks.

D. Thoroughly flush main line before installing valve.

3.08 QUICK COUPLER VALVES (QCV)
A. Install in valve box in accordance with Detail of Plan Sheet.

B. Install 12 inches from adjacent curb or concrete paving.

3.09 AUTOMATIC CONTROL WIRING
A. Run wires along main lines wherever practical. Tie wires in bundles with pipe wrapping tape at 20 foot intervals and allow slack for contraction between strapping. Place all above ground wiring in conduit.

B. Make connections with 3M Brand DBY Direct Bury Splice Kit, shall splice and effectively moisture seal two or more conductors. The electrical connector shall be a 'Scotchlok' DBY.

The device shall be installed per manufacture’s instructions and all applicable codes. The device shall be UL Listed as a Wire Connector System For Use With Underground Conductors.

C. Loop a minimum of three (3) feet of extra control wire and ground wire in each valve box and at all corners and at 200 foot intervals.

D. Splicing will be permitted only at valve locations or in junction boxes, equivalent to valve boxes, and approved by Engineer.

E. Where control lines pass under paving, or where interior wires are exposed, they shall pass through Schedule 40 PVC conduit.

3.10 AUTOMATIC CONTROLLER
A. The automatic sprinkler controller is to be a new automatic controller. Reference irrigation equipment legend. Contractor is to provide the following:

1. Furnish and install the new auto sprinkler controller, controller steel enclosure, and or enclosure concrete base as specified.

2. Provide all 100X electrical work required to heat the new controller.

3. Provide all 120 volt electrical work required to reconnect the existing systems control wires to the new auto controller.

4. Provide telephone service to controller location, if required per plan legend. Coordinate with installing contractor

1. Provide adequate electrical surge protection for the new automatic controller and as approved by the Owner's Representative.

3.11 SPRINKLER HEADS
A. General:

1. Set heads perpendicular to finished grades, unless otherwise indicated on the Drawings.

2. Sprinkler heads adjacent to Existing Walks, Curbs, or Other Paved Areas are to be set to grade, and as shown on the drawings.

3. Sprinkler heads in lawn areas where turf has not be established are to be set 2 inches above finished grade.
a. Lower heads installed in this manner to grade when turf is sufficiently established to allow walking on it without appreciable damage.
b. Complete lowering of heads within 30 calendar days after written notification by the Owner's Representative.

B. Flush lines thoroughly before installing heads, with the most distant circuit flushed last.

Once the flushing water is clean, put on sprinkler heads, starting with the closest circuit to the vacuum breaker.

C. The Contractor shall be responsible for providing full and even coverage. Make all necessary adjustments for proper distribution and coverage.

D. Avoid overthrow onto windows and keep overthrow onto buildings and pavement to an absolute minimum.

E. Bring any potential problems to the attention of the Owner's Representative prior to completion of the work.

3.12 BACKFILLING
A. Use earth excavated from trenches, free from rocks or other deleterious material. Avoid any sharp objects adjacent to pipe which could cause damage. At the Contractor's option, rock-free imported topsoil may be used to backfill around piping.

B. All PVC piping is to be covered with a 3 inch layer of sand wherever the backfill is rocky in nature as determined by Owner's Representative.

C. The sprinkler system trenches are to be backfilled in 6 inch lifts and adequately compacted to prevent subsequent settling.

D. Finish grade areas of backfill to match adjacent grade, removing any rocks or debris from the Site. Obtain approval from the Owner's Representative for relocating any excess earth on Site.

E. If settlement occurs along trenches, make all necessary adjustments to bring irrigation system, soil and turf or paving to proper grade at no additional cost to the Contract.

3.13 FIELD QUALITY CONTROL
A. All testing to be in full compliance with the requirements of the specifications.

B. Trench Inspection and Main Line Pressure Test

1. The Contractor shall not backfill pressure main line trench until an open trench inspection has been conducted and approved.

2. Test all pressure lines and connections to quick coupler valves, remote control valves and gate valves under hydrostatic pressure of 120 pounds per square inch prior to installation of remote control valves.

3.Trench Inspection and Main Line Pressure Test
A. The Contractor shall not backfill pressure main line trench until an open trench inspection has been conducted and approved.

B. Test all pressure lines and connections to quick coupler valves, remote control valves and gate valves under hydrostatic pressure of 120 pounds per square inch prior to installation of remote control valves.

C. All piping under paved areas shall be tested under hydrostatic pressure of 120 pounds per square inch prior to paving.

D. Sustain pressure in pressure lines for not less than twenty-four (24) hours. If leaks develop, replace joints and repeat test until entire system is proven watertight.

E. All hydrostatic tests shall be made only in the presence of the Owner. No pipe shall be backfilled, except for center loading, until it has been observed, tested and approved in writing by the Owner. Should any work be covered up before such observation and tests are completed, the Contractor shall, at his own expense, uncover the work; and after it has been observed, tested and approved, he then shall make all repairs with such materials as required to restore all work disturbed to original and proper condition.

F. Furnish necessary force pump and all other test equipment.

4. All piping under paved areas shall be tested under hydrostatic pressure of 120 pounds per square inch prior to paving.

5. Sustain pressure in pressure lines for not less than twenty-four (24) hours. If leaks develop, replace joints and repeat test until entire system is proven watertight.

6. All hydrostatic tests shall be made only in the presence of the Owner. No pipe shall be backfilled, except for center loading, until it has been observed, tested and approved in writing by the Owner. Should any work be covered up before such observation and tests are completed, the Contractor shall, at his own expense, uncover the work; and after it has been observed, tested and approved, he then shall make all repairs with such materials as required to restore all work disturbed to original and proper condition.

C. Furnish necessary force pump and all other test equipment D, PIPE TESTING: Notify Owner's Representative at least three (3) working days in advance of testing. All tests shall be at Contractor's expense. Use small amounts of backfill to stabilize pipe before testing, but keep all joints exposed. Test lines as follows:

1. Flushing and Testing:
a. After new sprinkler piping and risers are in place and connected and necessary work has been completed, and prior to installation of sprinkler heads, open control valves and apply full head of water to flush out system.
b. After the system is thoroughly flushed, and prior to backfilling, cap off and pressure test system.

C. Final System Test:

1. When irrigation system is complete and all adjustments have been made, notify the Owner's Representative to arrange final testing of system. A complete test of the system shall be made with all equipment connected and operating. Make any necessary adjustments as required by the Owner's Representative and retest as needed for final approval of system.

D. Manufacturer's Field Service:

1. Equipment manufacturer for controllers and automatic control valves shall provide one half day of field training in the operation and maintenance of the equipment to the Owner.

2. Equipment manufacturer for controllers, automatic control valves, and sprinklers shall inspect the installed system and its operation and certify in writing its proper installation and operation.

3.14 GUARANTEE
B. Submit in writing to the Owner's Representative.

C. It shall be the responsibility of the Contractor to fill and repair all depressions and replace all necessary paving or plating due to the settlement of irrigation trenches for one year following completion and acceptance of the job.

D. The Contractor shall guarantee all materials, equipment, and workmanship furnished by him to be free of all defects of workmanship and materials, and shall agree to replace at his expense at any time within one year after installation is accepted, any and all defective parts that may be found. In cases where emergency repairs are needed, or if the Contractor is not immediately available for repair work, the Owner shall have the option of making repairs at the Contractor's expense.

3.15 CLEAN-UP
A. The Contractor shall keep his work areas in a workmanlike and safe condition and so his rubbish, waste, and debris does not interfere with the work.

B. Upon completion of work in this Section, remove all rubbish, waste and debris from Site.

C. Remove all equipment and implements of service, leave entire area in a neat and clean condition to meet acceptance by the Owner's Representative.

END OF SECTION
SECTION 02900

PLANTING
PART 1 - GENERAL

1.01 SECTION INCLUDES
A. The work included under this Section consists of providing all necessary soil preparation and amending, finish and fine grading, furnishing and planting of all trees, shrubs, and ground cover, application of pre-emergent herbicide, mulching, maintenance, and all other materials, labor, and equipment required to complete the work indicated on the Planting Plans.

1.02 RELATED SECTIONS:

A. Section 02810 - Irrigation System: Provision of automatic irrigation system.

1.03 QUALITY ASSURANCE
A. Alternates: Verify whether Alternates as specified affect the work of this Section.

B. Contractor is to provide the Owner's Representative with copies of all Project material invoices and retain all empty material containers for count.

C. The Contractor shall furnish, without any extra charge, any additional material and labor when required by the compliance on these Specifications and Drawings.

D. The Contractor shall erect and maintain barricades, guards, warning signs, and lights as necessary or required for the protection of the work, the workmen, and public.

F. Contractor shall obtain and pay all fees, licenses, and permits required for this portion of the Project work.

G. Before making bid, examine the Site carefully, verifying dimensions and other Site conditions in relation to the Plans. The Contractor is responsible for informing himself of all conditions under which work is to be done before submitting his Bid.

H. When conditions detrimental to planting of trees, shrubs, and ground cover are encountered notify Owner's Representative before proceeding with work.

I. Contractor to verify quantities shown in the Consolidated Plant List to assure conformance with Landscape Drawings. Bring any discrepancies to the attention of the Owner's Representative.

J. For standard products, the manufacturer's analysis guarantee will be accepted. For all other materials, analysis will be a recognized laboratory as required by the Owner's Representative.

K. All plants shall be true to type and name in accordance with the current edition of Standardized Plant Names', Second Edition, and of size and caliper as shown in the Plant List.

L. Provide trees, shrubs, and other plants of size, genus, species and variety shown on Project Plant List and complying with recommendations and requirements of ANSI-Z60.1-90 American Standard for Nursery Stock.

M. Plantings shall be performed by personnel familiar with planting procedures and under the supervision of a qualified planting foreman. The planting foreman shall be on the job Site whenever planting is in progress.

N. No extra work shall be done without prior written approval of the Owner's Representative.

O. Contractor shall coordinate his work with that of any other Contractors working in, and adjacent to, the areas included in the Project work, and coordinate with these Contractors in performance of this work.

P. All work shall be in strict accordance with sound horticultural practice and shall include maintenance and watering of all materials installed in this Contract until final acceptance by the Owner's Representative.

Q. Keep the job Site free from accumulations of waste material or rubbish resulting from this work.

At the completion of the work, the Contractor shall remove all rubbish tools, and surplus materials, and shall leave the completed project neat and orderly.

1.04 JOB CONDITIONS
A. Proceed with and complete planting work as rapidly as portions of Site become available, working with seasonal limitations.

B. Determine locations of underground utilities and perform work in a manner which will avoid possible damage. Hand excavate, as required.

C. Maintain grade stakes set by others until removal is mutually agreed on by parties concerned.

D. Contractor shall verify the extent that the Project engineered fill extends into the planting areas. Where the engineered fill material is in conflict with sound horticultural practice, the contractor is to confer with the Owner's Representative to ascertain to what extent the engineered fill, in the planting areas, can be removed. The Landscape Contractor will be responsible for the removal of whatever engineered fill that is a problem and is agreed to by the Owner's Representative.

E. Before making bid, examine the Site carefully, verifying dimensions and other Site conditions in relation to the Plans. The Contractor is responsible for informing himself of all conditions under which work is to be done before submitting his bid.

13.e
Packet Pg. 452
Attachment: Project Plans (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue) 44 SUNNYSIDE AVENUE
3 STORY SINGLE FAMILY HOMES
44 SUNNYSIDE AVENUE

CAMPBELL, CALIFORNIA

L A N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T U R E
IDLA, INC.

California Landscape Architect #4122
ID #LA-16771 * HI #LA-16112
AZ #76633
P.O.BOX 170129
Boise, Idaho 83717
[email protected]
(208) 906-1300

SHEET ISSUANCE
L6

LANDSCAPE

SPECIFICATIONS
SECTION 02900
PLANTING, contd
PART 2 - PRODUCTS

2.01 TREES, SHRUBS, AND GROUND COVER
A. Plant materials shall be supplied in sizes as indicated in the Plant List. Container stock shall be well established in the container and the roots shall not have grown beyond the limits of the container, nor shall they be root bound. All plants shall have normal or average branching systems and shall be first class representatives of their species in appearance of healthy, vigorous growth. Plants shall be free of pests and disease and disfiguring injury. Trees shall be select and choice material, with symmetrical and full rounded heads appropriate for the species.

B. All plant materials delivered to the Site must conform to the Specifications of Federal, State and County laws, requiring inspection for plant diseases and insect infestations. Any inspection certificates required by law must accompany each shipment when plant materials arrive at the Site.

C. Plants delivered to the Site shall be adequately protected from the sun and wind during delivery and then stockpiled on the Site prior to planting. They shall be watered adequately. Containers shall be free of weeds or grasses.

D. Substitutions are not permitted except on proof that plant specified is not available.

Request for substitution must be made in writing to the Landscape Architect. No additional charge shall be made for substitutions except by the written authorization of the Landscape Architect.

E. The Landscape Architect shall be notified in writing, one week prior to planting, to inspect all or major portions of the plant materials to be used in the Project, if requested by owner or Architect.

F. The Landscape Architect shall be the final arbitrator in decisions regarding identification and nomenclature.

G. The Landscape Architect shall have the right to reject plants prior to and during the progress of work for size, conditions of top structure, conditions of root structure, defects or injuries or nonconformity to Specifications.

2.02 SOIL AMENDMENTS
A. After rough grading operations, the contractor is responsible for obtaining a soils report that provides an analysis of the existing soil that states what soil amendments are required for optimum planting growth. The contractor shall incorporate the recommended quantities by thoroughly cultivating all planting areas to a depth of eight (8) inches. Rough finish grade all areas.

B. Prior to the planting of any materials, compacted soils shall be transformed to a friable condition. On engineered slopes, only amended planting holes need meet this requirement C. Broadcast the following soil amendments. Quantities given are per 1,000 square feet of area.

C.A. Nitrogen stabilized and iron fortified compost:per soil analysis recommendations, or 4 cy MINIMUM for bid purposes
C.B. Pelletized fertilizer (21-0-0): 10lbs., or as per soil analysis recommendations C.C. Soil Sulfur: per soil analysis recommendations
C.D. Gypsum: 100 lbs
D. Cultivate and thoroughly incorporate the amendments into the top eight (8) inches of soil.

E. De-rock area to be planted by using a mechanical rock picker. All rocks larger than 1 inch in diameter are to be removed.

2.03 FERTILIZERS
A. Agriform planting tables, as manufactured by Sierra Chemical. 21 gram size with 20-10-5 analysis.

B. Commercial fertilizer, as manufactured by Best Fertilizer Co. with a 16-6-8 + iron analysis.

2.04 EXISTING TOPSOIL
A. It will be the Landscape Contractor's responsibility to provide all labor and equipment to remove all site topsoil spoils and dig-out as may be required to complete the finish the fine grading work.

2.05 TREE STAKES AND TIES
A. Tree stakes shall be 2 inches diameter x 8 feet long, treated lodge pole stakes, free from knots and splits.

B. Tree ties shall be "Cinch-Ties", length as required, as manufactured by V.I.T. Products, Inc.

2.06 PREEMERGENT HERBICIDE(S)
A. The preemergent herbicide is to be one that has proven successful in the local area, is recommended by a license Pest Control Advisor and has the approval of the Owner's Representative.

2.07 FIR BARK MULCH
A. Install A minimum three inch (3") depth fir bark mulch over the filter fabric.

B. A (3″) layer of mulch shall be applied on all exposed soil surfaces of planting areas except in turf areas, creeping or rooting ground covers, or direct seeding applications where mulch is contraindicated on all shrub and ground cover planting areas. Bark mulch shall be wood residual derived and manufactured from Pine, White and/or Red Fir Tree bark. The material shall be equal to that referred to as 'Walk on Bark' in the trade.

C. Organic mulch materials made from recycled or post-consumer shall take precedence over inorganic materials or virgin forest products unless the recycled post-consumer organic products are not locally available. Organic mulches are not required where prohibited by local Fuel Modification Plan Guidelines or other applicable local ordinances

2.08 GRAVEL MULCH
A. Gravel mulch is to be one
3 4" inch size crushed rock.

B. Place 4-6" size 'river washed' cobble over landscape fabric.

C. place moss rock fieldstone boulders, size and location as per plan. Bury the boulder 1 3 or to
the existing soil line on the rock
D. Provide gravel sample for approval of the Owner's Representative.

E. Gravel is to be placed to a minimum two (2) inch thickness over a weed barrier filter fabric.

2.09 WEED BARRIER FILTER FABRIC
A. Manufactured of polypropylene, 28 mil thickness, and 2.6 ounces per square yard. DeWitt Pro-5, or equal.

B. Secure fabric segments, to soil, with 6"x1"x6" steel 'U' shape pins.

C. Overlap adjacent fabric segments a minimum of six (6) inches and secure with pins at twenty four (24) inches on center.

PART 3 - EXECUTION

3.01 SOIL PREPARATION AND AMENDING
A. Thoroughly cultivate all planting areas to a depth of eight (8) inches.

B. Rough finish grade all areas.

3.13 PLANTING MAINTENANCE
A. Provide all necessary maintenance during specified maintenance period, including but not limited to, watering, weeding, replanting, fertilizing, treatment of diseases and pests, and protection from rodents, and people encroachment.

1.Check all tree ties and adjust if too tight or too loose. Remove all nursery stakes and ties.

2.Provide supplementary deep watering for trees at one month intervals during maintenance period, using a slowly trickling water hose. Fill planting basins, let water soak in, and refill.

3.Replace any plants not in a healthy and thriving condition

4.Arrange watering schedule to avoid wetting of foliage when exposed to hot sunlight.

5.Keep planting basins in good repair and free of weeds.

6.Plants blown over shall be replanted and restaked or replaced if damaged.

7.Protect all plants against damage from any source. Treat or replace all damaged trees during the maintenance period.

8.Re-set any plants where root crowns have settled below adjacent finish grade or where tree trunks are leaning from vertical position.

9.Prune only to remove broken twigs, unbalanced branching conditions or suckers.

10. At conclusion of maintenance period, re-surface planting beds as needed with a fresh layer of mulch to maintain the required depth.

END OF SECTION

CLOSEOUT PROCEDURES

1.1 DESCRIPTION
A. Section Includes: The work includes, but is not necessarily limited to, performing all operations necessary for and properly incidental to closing out the project and assisting in Owner's final inspection as hereinafter specified.

1.2 FINAL COMPLETION
A. When the Contractor considers the work, or a designated portion of the work complete, submit written request to Owner's Representative for inspection. By submittal of request, Contractor certifies that:

1.Contract Documents have been reviewed.

2.Work has been completed in accordance with the Contract Documents and is ready for inspection.

3.Equipment systems have been tested, adjusted, balanced and is fully operational.

B. Submit request a minimum of five (5) working days in advance of requested inspection date. Contractor shall be responsible for allowing sufficient time during contract period to complete inspection and any correction.

C. Should Owner's Representative inspection find work incomplete, Owner's Representative will notify Contractor in writing, listing observed deficiencies.

D. Contractor shall remedy listed deficiencies and sent a request for final inspection. At the Owner's option, a re-inspection(s) of the work to identify additional deficiencies, if any, may be required. Owner's costs associated with reinspection(s) are subject to provisions of Article 1.04 of this Section.

E. When Owners confirm work is complete, and close-out submittals as referred to in Article

1.04 of this Section are provided, Owner's Representative will notify Contractor of date of completion in writing.

1.3 REINSPECTIONS
A. Should status of completion of work require reinspection(s) by Owner due to failure of work to comply with Contractor's claim on initial inspection, Owner may deduct the amount of compensation for reinspection services from final payment to Contractor.

Observed deficiencies in excess of ten (10) will be reason for reinspection.

B. Inspection initiated at the request of the Owner will not be subjected to the provisions of this Article.

1.4 CLOSE-OUT SUBMITTALS
A. Project Record Documents
B. Operation and Maintenance Data
C. Warranties and Guarantees
D. Spare Parts and Maintenance Materials
E. Evidence of Payment and Lien Releases along with a list of all subcontractors which contributed labor or materials to the project.

F. Other data and material as may be required in individual Sections of the Specifications.

1.5 APPLICATION FOR FINAL PAYMENT
A. Submit application for final payment in accordance with provisions of the contract for Construction.

INSPECTION SCHEDULE:

The Landscape Architect shall accomplish the following inspections in concert with the Project Coordinator, and the Landscape Contractor. Call at least 48 hours in advance of the requested inspection:

1. Pre-Landscape Construction Meeting with Landscape Architect, Landscape Contractor and Construction Site Supervisor

2. Landscape Architect inspection:

A. Irrigation System Layout and Coverage Inspection, including:

B. Irrigation Mainline and Lateral Pressure Check Layout inspection or deviation from C. Irrigation system as per plans
D. Installation inspection of main lines
E. Installation inspection of laterals and non-pressure system trenches

3. Landscape Architect inspection:

A. Plant Inspection and Soil Preparation Inspection, including:

Review/approve amendments
Ensure correct soil preparation
Verify finish grade
Plant material quality
Layout in conformance with Project plans/specification

4. Landscape Architect inspection:

A. Final Landscape Improvements Inspection and approval B. Commencement of Maintenance Period with letter of approval from the landscape architect. All punch list items from previous inspection must be complete Requests for progress payments must include approved inspection reports authorized by the Landscape Architect and or the owner's agent C. Broadcast the following soil amendments. Quantities given are per 1,000 square feet of area.

Nitrogen stabilized and iron fortified compost:4 CY per 1000 sf, or as per soil analysis recommendations
Pelletized fertilizer (21-0-0): per soil analysis recommendations Soil Sulfur: per soil analysis recommendations
D. Cultivate and thoroughly incorporate the amendments into the top eight (8) inches of soil.

E. De-rock area to be planted by using a mechanical rock picker. All rocks larger than 1 inch in diameter are to be removed.3.02 FINISH GRADING
A. Fine grade areas to smooth, even surface with loose, uniform texture. Rake and drag areas to remove ridges and fill depressions as required to meet finish grades. Limit fine grading to areas which can be planted immediately after grading.

B. The finish grade of all shrubs and/or ground cover planting areas is to be 2 1/2 inches below the top of all adjacent concrete walks, curbs, and asphalt paving.

C. Remove all debris, exposed rocks, and compacted soil clods 1 inch in diameter or larger, from all planting areas. Use a mechanical rock picker for this. All finish grades shall be subject to the approval of the Engineer.

3.03 PLANTING OF TREES, SHRUBS AND VINES
A. The planting work shall be deferred until earthwork, construction, irrigation, soil preparation and finish grading work has been completed.

B. No planting shall occur during unfavorable weather conditions or when the soil is excessively wet, as determined by the Owner's Representative.

C. Stake or spot all plant locations, as shown on the Planting Plans. Obtain approval of plant locations, by the Owner's Representative or landscape Architect, prior to commencement of planting.

D. Planting Procedure:

D.A. Excavate plant holes to the dimensions indicated on Planting Plans. Refer to Planting Details. Roughen excavation sides and loosen bottom.

D.B. Fill plant excavation with water and allow to percolate completely.

D.C. Add and firm backfill soil to bring the plant soil / root ball to the proper planting elevation. The backfill soil is to consist of the excavated site topsoil with all rocks larger than 1 inch diameter removed from backfill soil. Use unconditioned site topsoil for backfill below the 8 inch depth which has been limed by premixing one (1) cubic yard of site topsoil with organic compost.

D.D. All plant material is to be removed from containers by approved methods. Loosen the bottom and sides of the exposed root ball and unwind or cut any circling roots.

Protect root ball from the drying effects of sun and wind.

D.E. Place plant in the center of the excavation and adjust root ball elevation so that top of root ball is one (1) inch above the level of the surrounding soil grade.

D.F. Complete the backfilling of the root ball with light tamping as the backfill soil is placed.

D.G. Add 21 gram size Agriform (20-10-5) planting tablets to the backfill of all plant material. Reference planting details on plan and quantity schedule below.

Plant Container Size Tablets Required
#1 1
#2 2
#5 3
#15 5
24" box 5
D.H. Construct a water retention basin around each plan, 4" high for trees and 3" high for shrubs. Water thoroughly to settle the backfill soil. Add backfill as required by settling.

3.08 TREE STAKING AND GRASS-FREE AREA
A. All trees are to be staked as per the Tree Staking Details occurring on the Planting Plans.

B. Care is to be exercised to maintain tree stakes in the proper horizontal alignment, and vertically to be set plumb.

3.09 PLANT MATERIAL GUARANTEE
A. The Contractor shall guarantee all plant material from latent defects, disease or death, and injury for a period of twelve (12) months after final acceptance of the total Project by the Owner's Representative.

B. The Contractor shall promptly replace, at no additional cost, plants that are not in a vigorous, healthy, growing condition. Replacement shall be of the same kind and size as originally specified and shall be planted as described on the Planting Plans and in these Specifications.

C. This guarantee does not include plant loss, due to physical damage or neglect during normal maintenance, by others, subsequent to the end of the project contract maintenance period.

3.10 OBSERVATION AND ACCEPTANCE
A. After all plants have been installed, the Owner's Representative will make a preliminary observation.

1.Upon preliminary observation and approval of the work, a ninety (90) day calendar day maintenance period will begin.

2. If any plants or work are not approved, immediate replacement and/or repair will be made and regular maintenance then continued for ninety (90) days after replacement.

B. Final observation will be made at the end of the ninety (90) day maintenance period.

Submit written notice requesting this observation at least one week in advance.

1.Plant basins shall be repaired, all plantings given a final watering, and the job cleared of all weeds and debris and presented in a neat and orderly fashion.

2.The work, exclusive of the replacement of plant materials, shall be accepted by the Owner's Representative upon completion of the ninety (90) day maintenance period and upon written approval of the work by the Owner's Representative.

3.Clean paved area by sweeping and/or washing. Remove any defacement or stains caused by work of this Section.

4.Remove construction equipment, excess materials, tools, debris, and rubbish.

5.Repair any existing property damaged or altered due to work of the landscape planting.

3.11 INSTRUCTIONS TO THE OWNER
A. Full and complete typewritten instructions for long term maintenance of the landscaping are to be furnished to the Owner's Representative at least 10 days prior to the end of the Contractor's maintenance period. The Owner may retain final payment if this item is not completed.

3.12 GENERAL CLEAN-UP
A. During the process of the work, the Site shall be kept in a reasonably neat and clean condition, free from the accumulation of cans, surplus materials, and waste materials.

B. Upon completion of the work, remove all equipment, dispose of all waste, refuse, or debris resulting from this work, and leave the premises in a neat and clean condition.

C. All planting areas shall be neatly dressed and finished and all walks, paved areas, curbs, and gutters flushed clean to the satisfaction of the Owner's Representative.

13.e
Packet Pg. 453
Attachment: Project Plans (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue) 44 SUNNYSIDE AVENUE
3 STORY SINGLE FAMILY HOMES
44 SUNNYSIDE AVENUE

CAMPBELL, CALIFORNIA

L A N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T U R E
IDLA, INC.

California Landscape Architect #4122
ID #LA-16771 * HI #LA-16112
AZ #76633
P.O.BOX 170129
Boise, Idaho 83717
[email protected]
(208) 906-1300

SHEET ISSUANCE
0 SCALE:
feet10 20 30
1" = 10'
NORTH
L7
PLANT palette
Lophostemon confertus 'Variegata'
Acer palmatum 'Sango-kaku'
Tulbaghia violacea
Dietes vegeta
Juncus patens `Carman`s Grey`
Carex barbarae
Prunus caroliniana `Compacta`
Mahonia repens
Teucrium x lucidrys prostratum
Nandina domestica 'Gulf
Stream'

TREES BOTANICAL NAME
Acer palmatum 'Sango-kaku'
Lophostemon confertus 'Variegata'

SHRUBS BOTANICAL NAME
Mahonia repens
Nandina domestica 'Gulf Stream'
Prunus caroliniana `Compacta`

PERENNIALS BOTANICAL NAME
Dietes vegeta
Teucrium x lucidrys prostratum
Tulbaghia violacea

STORM WATER MANAGEMENT PLANTINGS BOTANICAL NAME
Carex barbarae
Juncus patens `Carman`s Grey`

GROUND COVERS BOTANICAL NAME

MIXED SUCCULENTS

MATERIALS BOTANICAL NAME
2" DEPTH 1-1/2" DRAIN ROCK
2023-07-06 10:17

PLANT SCHEDULE
mixed succulents

EXISTING REDWOOD

TREES TO REMAIN

08.11.23 13.e
Packet Pg. 454
Attachment: Project Plans (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue)

JOINT TRENCH TITLE SHEET
N.T.S.

JT-1
1 SCALE:

PROJECT MANAGER:

CHECKED BY:

DRAWN BY:

PROJECT NUMBER:

SHEET: OF:

CALIFORNIA
LAST UPDATED:

DRAWING NUMBER:

REVISION DELTA NO:DATE:
44 SUNNYSIDE AVE

NEW BUSINESS

GRANITE RIDGE PROPERTIES

CAMPBELL
23-1251

MICHAEL COLE

JIE ROU FANG

MICHAEL COLE
08-01-2023
21460 MARIA LANE, SUITE 420, WALNUT CREEK, CA 94596
Tel 925) 269-4575

UTILITY DESIGN CONSULTANTS & ENGINEERS

13.e
Packet Pg. 455
Attachment: Project Plans (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue)

JOINT TRENCH INTENT
1" = 20'
JT-2
2 SCALE:

PROJECT MANAGER:

CHECKED BY:

DRAWN BY:

PROJECT NUMBER:

SHEET: OF:

CALIFORNIA
LAST UPDATED:

DRAWING NUMBER:

REVISION DELTA NO:DATE:
44 SUNNYSIDE AVE

NEW BUSINESS

GRANITE RIDGE PROPERTIES

CAMPBELL
23-1251

MICHAEL COLE

JIE ROU FANG

MICHAEL COLE
08-01-2023
21460 MARIA LANE, SUITE 420, WALNUT CREEK, CA 94596
Tel 925) 269-4575

UTILITY DESIGN CONSULTANTS & ENGINEERS

13.e
Packet Pg. 456
Attachment: Project Plans (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue) PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING MINUTES Tuesday, December 12, 2023 I 7:30pm City Hall Council Chamber CALL TO ORDER The Regular Planning Commission meeting of December 12, 2023 was called to order at 7:30 pm by Chair Buchbinder, and the following proceedings were had to wit. ROLL CALL Staff present: Bill Seligmann, City Attorney Daniel Fama, Senior Planner (Acting Secretary) Tracy Tam, Associate Planner Larissa Lomen, Assistant Planner Ken Ramirez, Administrative Analyst APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approval of Minutes of November 28, 2023 (Roll Call Vote) Meeting Minutes, 11/28/2023 (Regular Meeting) Commissioners present at 11/28/23 Planning Commission meeting approved meeting minutes. COMMUNICATIONS Senior Planner Daniel Fama advised of an email communication for Item 4, 1320 Burrows Road, that was provided to staff earlier in the evening. AGENDA MODIFICATIONS OR POSTPONEMENTS Planning Commissioners Present: Adam Buchbinder, Chair Alan Zisser, Vice Chair Davis Fields Michael Krey Matt Kamkar Planning Commissioners Absent Maggie Ostrowski Cori Majewski

13.f
Packet Pg. 457
Attachment: PC Meeting Minutes (2023-12-12) (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue) Campbell Planning Commission Meeting Minutes December 12, 2023 Page 6 of 10AYES: Fields, Krey, Kamkar, Zisser, Buchbinder NOES: None ABSENT: Majewski, Ostrowski ABSTAIN: None Chair Buchbinder closed the Public Hearing for Agenda Item No. 4. PLN-2023-135 44 & 56 Sunnyside Avenue Public Hearing to consider the request of Sachneel Patel on behalf of 44 Sunnyside LLC to allow construction of a 6-lot detached single-family residential subdivision, and related removal of on-44 & 56 Sunnyside Avenue. The applications under consideration include a Planned Development Permit, Tentative Vesting Subdivision Map, and Tree Removal Permit submitted under an SB-330 preliminary application filed in compliance with Government Code § 65941.1. File No.: PLN-2023-135. Staff is recommending that this project be deemed Categorically Exempt under CEQA. Tentative City Council Date: January 22, 2024. Project Planner: Daniel Fama, Senior Planner. Recommended Action: Adopt a Resolution (reference Attachment A) recommending that the City Council approve a Planned Development Permit, Tentative Vesting Subdivision Map, and Tree Removal Permit. Chair Buchbinder opened the Public Hearing for Agenda Item No. 5. Senior Planner Daniel Fama presented the staff report to consider the request of Sachneel Patel on behalf of 44 Sunnyside LLC to allow construction of a 6-lot detached single-family residential subdivision, and related removal of on-on property located at 44 & 56 Sunnyside Avenue. Senior Planner Fama clarified that the porch line is considered the actual setback. Commissioners inquired if before the recent changes would the City have typically asked the applicants to try to redesign the project slightly to save Mulberry Tree No. 1 in the front corner, which is a protected tree? Senior Planner Fama responded yes, and that is what did happen with the redwood trees on the lot that were slated for removal, but the redwood trees are in much better condition than the mulberry tree and there are two of them. Senior Planner Fama clarified that because these buildings are three stories the fire department would need aerial access, and 26 feet for the private street is the minimum the City provides for fire access. Two story homes would only need 20 feet minimum for fire access.

13.f
Packet Pg. 458
Attachment: PC Meeting Minutes (2023-12-12) (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue) Campbell Planning Commission Meeting Minutes December 12, 2023 Page 7 of 10Senior Planner Fama clarified that the depth of the lot is less than 150 feet, so a turnaround is not required. Commissioners inquired about the reason for the 2-foot setback. Senior Planner Fama responded the property line is pushed inward so there could be a sidewalk and a park strip, and though it is not consistent with the rest of the street, this property is next to a commercial property and Public Works wishes to continue that streetscape through this property. Commissioners discussed neighbor concerns expressed during the preliminary application and inquired about design changes made to accommodate these concerns. Senior Planner Fama responded the design is largely the same. Senior Planner Fama clarified that this is a housing application that cannot be denied without violating the Housing Accountability Act, however, the Commission could condition it in a manner that does not General Plan policy. Senior Planner Fama clarified that there would be replacement trees provided for the trees that would be removed. Commissioners inquired about sidewalk requirements, how expensive it is to install a sidewalk, and how one builds a sidewalk that complies with Public Works requirements. where the City requires certain types of off-site public improvement to be installed as part of the project. Commissioners discussed a new requirement beginning September 2024 to treat street storm water in the street and using park strips as a place to treat the water. Senior Planner Fama clarified that the park strip in this case is not for storm water treatment, but more for aesthetics and connection to the commercial sidewalk next door. Chair Buchbinder opened Public Comment. Commission. Commissioners inquired regarding any shadow studies that may have been conducted on the site.

13.f
Packet Pg. 459
Attachment: PC Meeting Minutes (2023-12-12) (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue) Campbell Planning Commission Meeting Minutes December 12, 2023 Page 8 of 10of the two buildings. He noted that the neighbors also made comments regarding the window placement and said the applicant is open to make adjustments. Chair Buchbinder closed Public Comment. Commissioners were supportive of the new design and discussed how this home might change the character of the street that contains historic structures, but acknowledged the street already contains several multi-unit buildings and is adjacent to Winchester Boulevard. Commissioners also discussed how the three-story design is a good way for the City to meet its RHNA numbers and hoped some of the units would be ADUs. along the development simply because there is commercial next to it. Commissioners wondered whether they were giving up a setback for a little bit wider sidewalk for no real reason. Senior Planner Fama informed the Commission that he would flag this issue for the City Council. Motion: Upon motion by Commissioner Krey, seconded by Commissioner Kamkar, the Planning Commission motioned to grant approval of a Planned Development Permit, Tentative Subdivision Map, and Tree Removal Permit to allow construction of a 6-lot detached single-family residential subdivision, and related removal of on-Avenue. AYES: Fields, Krey, Kamkar, Zisser, Buchbinder NOES: None ABSENT: Majewski, Ostrowski ABSTAIN: None Chair Buchbinder closed the Public Hearing for Agenda Item No. 5. OLD BUSINESS 6. Planning Commission Parking Ad-Hoc Subcommittee -Hoc Subcommittee on Non-Residential Parking Reform. that they want the Planning Commission to work on it at all. Commisinput on the proposal as well.

13.f
Packet Pg. 460
Attachment: PC Meeting Minutes (2023-12-12) (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue) 44&56SunnysideAveArborist Report 2023
PreparedFor:

TomWilson44SunnysideLLC
Site:44&56SunnysideAveCampbell,CA95008
Submittedby:

David BeckhamCertifiedArboristWE#10724ATRAQQualified

13.g
Packet Pg. 461
Attachment: Arborist Report (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue) RevisedDate:8/11/2023Date:6/28/2023
Attn:TomWilson,44SunnysideLLCSite:44&56SunnysideAve,Campbell,CA95008 Re:Treeremovalandtreeprotectionplanforproposednew,multi-unitbuildingconstructionat44&56SunnysideAve,Campbell,CA95008 DearMr.Wilson,Atyourrequest,KieltyArboristsServicesLLChasvisitedthepropertyreferencedabovetoevaluatethetreespresentwithrespecttotheproposedconstructionproject.Thereportbelowcontainstheanalysisofthesitevisit.

SUMMARY
Thecombinedpropertiescontainatotalof14trees.Twooftheexistingtreesareprotected:Redwoodtrees#9and#10.Theseredwoodtreeswillbepreservedaspartoftheproposedconstruction,inalignmentwiththetreeprotectionplandetailedbelow.Non-protectedtrees#1-8,and11-14arerecommendedforremoval,astheyareindeclineorconflictwithproposedprojectfeatures.Allofthetreessurveyedareinfairtopoorcondition,withredwoodtrees#9and#10ingoodconditionandthusprioritizedforpreservation.Thesiteat44&56SunnysideAvelookstobeinfairconditionandwellmaintainedinthepast.Thetopographyofthelandisflat.

ASSIGNMENT
Attherequestoftheownerat44&56SunnysideAve,Campbell,CA95008,KieltyArboristsServicesLLCconductedasitevisiton6/27/2023toprepareacomprehensiveTreeInventoryReportfortheproposedconstructionproject.ThisreportisarequirementwhensubmittingplanstotheCityofCampbell.TheanalysisinthisreportisbasedonthearchitecturalplansA01throughA12receivedfrom44&56SunnysideAve,Campbell,CA95008,dated6/16/2023.

Theprimaryfocusofthisreportisasfollows:
● Identificationandassessmentoftreesontheconstructionsitethatmaybeaffectedbytheproposeddevelopment.● Determinationofpotentialimpactsontreehealthandstability,consideringfactorssuchasrootdamageandcrowndamage.● Provisionofrecommendationsfortreeprotectionandpreservationmeasuresduringtheconstructionprocesstomitigatepotentialimpacts.● Ensuringcompliancewithlocalregulationspertainingtotreepreservation,protection,andremovalwithintheconstructionplans.

Pleasenotethatthereportwillprovidespecificdetailsregardingtreeassessments.

KieltyArboristServicesLLCArboristReport2023 RevisedDate:8/7/20231

13.g
Packet Pg. 462
Attachment: Arborist Report (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue)

INTRODUCTION
Accordingtoourpastcommunicationswithcitystaff,theCityofCampbellrequiresthefollowingtreereportingelementsfordevelopmentprojects:1.Inventoryofalltreesshownonthesurvey.2.Mapoftreelocations.3.Treeprotection,removal,orreplacementrecommendationsforallprotectedtrees.

LIMITSOFTHEASSIGNMENT
Aspartofthisassessment,itisimportanttonotethatKieltyArboristServicesLLCdidnotconductanaerialinspectionoftheuppercrown,adetailedrootcrowninspection,oraplanttissueanalysisonthesubjecttrees.Therefore,theinformationpresentedinthisreportdoesnotincludedataobtainedfromthesespecificmethods.

Furthermore,itisessentialtoclarifythatnotreeriskassessmentswerecompletedaspartofthisreportunlessstatedotherwise.Thefocusofthisassessmentprimarilycentersontreeidentification,generalhealthevaluation,andthepotentialimpactsoftheproposedconstruction.

Whiletheabsenceofthesespecificassessmentslimitsthescopeoftheanalysis,thefindingsandrecommendationsprovidedwithinthisreportarebasedonavailableinformationandobservationsmadeduringthesitevisit.

PURPOSE&USEOFTHEREPORT
Thisreportinformstreemanagementdecisionsfortheconstructionprojectandprovidesrecommendationstomaximizetreesurvival.Itservesasavaluableresourceforstakeholders,facilitatinginformeddiscussionsandsustainabletreemanagementpractices.

TESTING&ANALYSIS
Inordertoassessthetrees,athoroughexaminationwasconductedusingavarietyofmethods.Fortreeswithaccessibletrunks,precisemeasurementsoftheDiameteratBreastHeight(DBH)weretakenusingaspecializeddiametertapemeasure.Incaseswherethetrunkswerenotreadilyaccessible,visualestimationswereemployedtodeterminetheDBH.Aspartoftheinventoryprocess,alltreesexceedingaspecificDBHthresholdof6”incheswereincluded.

Toevaluatethehealthofthetrees,multiplefactorswereconsidered,includingtheiroverallappearanceandourteam'sextensiveexperientialknowledgeofeachspecies.Thisholisticapproachensuredacomprehensiveunderstandingofthetrees'well-being.

Toaccuratelydocumentthelocationofeachtree,aGPSsmartphoneapplicationwasutilizedduringthedatacollectionprocess.Thisenabledustocreatedetailedmapsthatareincludedinthisreport.However,itisimportanttonotethatdespiteoureffortstominimizeerrors,inherent KieltyArboristServicesLLCArboristReport2023 RevisedDate:8/7/20232

13.g
Packet Pg. 463
Attachment: Arborist Report (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue) limitationsofGPSdatacollection,coupledwithslightdiscrepanciesbetweenGPSdataandCADdrawings,mayresultinapproximatetreelocationsdepictedonthemapbelow.

Toconductthisassessment,asitevisitwasconductedon6/27/2023.Duringthisvisit,meticulousobservationsandhigh-qualityphotographswereobtainedtoprovideacomprehensiveanalysis.

Thefindingsandrecommendationspresentedinthisreportarebasedontheconstructionplanstitled"44SunnysideAvenue"bySDGArchitectsInc.Theseplanswereelectronicallyprovidedtousviaemailandaredated6/16/2023.Bythoroughlyanalyzingtheseplansinconjunctionwithourfieldobservations,wehavedevelopedanaccurateandreliableassessmentofthetreeconditions.

METHODOFINSPECTION
Theinspectionswereconductedfromthegroundwithoutclimbingthetrees.Notissuesamplesorrootcrowninspectionswereperformed.Thetreesunderconsiderationwereidentifiedbasedontheprovidedsiteplan.Toassessthetrees,theirdiameterat54inchesabovegroundlevel(DBHordiameteratbreastheight)wasmeasuredusingaD-Tape.Additionally,theprotectedtreeswereevaluatedfortheirhealth,structure,form,suitabilityforpreservationwiththefollowingexplanationoftheratings:

TreeHealthRatings:● Good:Thetreedisplaysvigorousgrowthwithnormal-sized,shaped,andcoloredfoliage.Thecanopydensityisbetween90-100%,withminimaltonodeadwood,minorornopestinfestation,andlittletonodecay.Thetreeisexpectedtohaveanaturallifespan.● Fair:Thenewgrowthshootsmaybeshorterthanexpected,andthecanopydensityrangesfrom60-90%.Somesmallbranchdieback,noticeablepestinfestation,and/ordecaymaybepresent.Althoughthetreeisnotcurrentlyindecline,externalfactorssuchasconstructionimpacts,increasedpestpressure,ordroughtmayaffectitshealth.● Poor:Thetreeexhibitslittletononewgrowthandsignificantdieback.Thefoliagemaybeundersized,distorted,yellowed,ordisplayabnormalcolors.Thecanopydensityis20-60%orless,withsubstantialdeadwood,pestinfestation,ordecay.Thetreeisnotexpectedtoreachitsnaturallifespan.TreeStructureRatings:● Good:Minorstructuralflawscanbeaddressedthroughpruning.Thetreehasanuprighttrunkwithasingleleaderorcanbeeasilytrainedtohaveone.Scaffoldbranchesaresmallerthantheleader,attachedtothetrunkatanglesapproaching45degrees,andwell-spacedverticallyandradially.Noincludedbarkorsignsofpreviousbranchfailures.Foliageisevenlydistributedonthelimbs,andthecanopyissymmetricalormostlysymmetrical.● Fair:Somestructuralflawscannotbecorrectedthroughpruning.Thetreemayhavemultipletrunksorleaders,aslightlean,branchesattachedatangleslessthan30to10degrees,and/orcrowdingonthetrunk.Includedbark,previousbranchfailures,orend-heavylimbsmaybepresent,andsomeasymmetryinthecanopymaybeobserved.

KieltyArboristServicesLLCArboristReport2023 RevisedDate:8/7/20233

13.g
Packet Pg. 464
Attachment: Arborist Report (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue) ● Poor:Significantstructuralflawsthatcannotbeaddressedthroughpruningareevident.Theremaybesignificantdeadwoodordecay,multipletrunksorleaders,crowdedbranchesonthetrunk,significantlyincludedbark,previousbranchfailures,and/orasymmetry.Thetreemayalsoexhibitaprecipitouslean,indicatingpotentialhazard.TreeFormRatings:● Good:Thetree'sformisnearlyidealforitsspecies,withminorasymmetriesordeviationsthatdonotcompromisefunctionoraesthetics.Italignswiththeintendeduseandisconsistentwiththelandscape.● Fair:Thetree'sformdisplaysmajorasymmetriesordeviationsfromthespeciesnormand/orintendeduse.Thiscompromisesfunctionand/oraesthetics.● Poor:Thetree'sformislargelyasymmetricorabnormal,significantlydetractingfromtheintendeduseandaesthetics.Itisvisuallyunappealingandprovideslittletonofunctioninthelandscape.SuitabilityforPreservation(forprotectedtreesonly):Thisratingisbasedsolelyonthetreeitself,irrespectiveofpotentialconstructionimpacts.● Good:Thetreeiscurrentlyanassettothelandscapeandcanbeexpectedtosurviveminortomoderateconstructionimpactswithadequateprotection.● Fair:Thetreecontributestothelandscapeandmaybenefitfrompruningorothermaintenanceactivities.Itshouldsurviveminorconstructionimpactswithadequateprotection,andimplementingprotectivemeasuresisrecommendedunlessconstructionimpactsareextensive.● Poor:Thetreedoesnotcontributetothelandscapeandisinpoorhealth,potentiallyposinghazards.Itisnotexpectedtosurviveanyconstructionimpacts.Sometreeswithpoorviabilitymayberetainediftheywillnotbeimpactedbyconstruction.OverallConditionRatings:Thetreeswereassignedaconditionratingbasedonacombinationofexistingtreehealth(50%)andtreestructure(50%)usingthefollowingscale:● 1-29:VeryPoor● 30-49:Poor● 50-69:Fair● 70-89:Good● 90-100:Excellent KieltyArboristServicesLLCArboristReport2023 RevisedDate:8/7/20234

13.g
Packet Pg. 465
Attachment: Arborist Report (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue) TreeInventoryTable:

KieltyArboristServicesLLCArboristReport2023 RevisedDate:8/7/20235

13.g
Packet Pg. 466
Attachment: Arborist Report (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue) KieltyArboristServicesLLCArboristReport2023 RevisedDate:8/7/20236

13.g
Packet Pg. 467
Attachment: Arborist Report (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue) KieltyArboristServicesLLCArboristReport2023 RevisedDate:8/7/20237

13.g
Packet Pg. 468
Attachment: Arborist Report (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue) TREEMAP:

KieltyArboristServicesLLCArboristReport2023 RevisedDate:8/7/20238

13.g
Packet Pg. 469
Attachment: Arborist Report (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue) SpeciesList:14treesweresurveyedonthisproperty.Thesurveyedspeciescompriseofthefollowing:•Mulberry,citrus,olive,yucca,camellia,loquat,redwood,andItaliancypress.

TreeRemovalForProposedDevelopment:'unprotected'SizeTrees:Total=12(Trees#1-8,and11-14) HeritageAndProtectedTreesDefined:AsdefinedintheCityofCampbellMunicipalCode:

Thefollowingtreesareconsidered"protected"andrequireapprovalofaTreeRemovalPermit:◼AllProperties:(1)Anytreeshownonanapprovedlandscapingplanorrequiredtobeplantedorretainedasaconditionofapprovalofadevelopmentapplication,abuildingpermit,oratreeremovalpermit;(2)Anytreedesignatedasa"HeritageTree"bytheHistoricPreservationBoard.◼Single-FamilyResidentialProperties.AnyOak,Redwood,Cedar, orAshtreemeasuring12-inchesindiameterorgreater(asmeasured4-feetabovegrade).◼AllOtherProperties.Anytreemeasuring12-inchesindiameterorgreater(asmeasured4-feetabovegrade).Exceptions:Regardlessofsize,fruittreesandEucalyptustreesarenotconsidered"protected"anddonotrequireaTreeRemovalPermit.

RemovedTreesReplacementProgram:AspertheCityofCampbellPlanningDivision:“IfyourTreeRemovalPermitrequestisapproved,youwillberequiredtoreplacethetree(s).Theminimumnumberandsizeofreplacementtreesisbasedonthenumberandsizeoftreesapprovedforremoval,asindicatedinthetablebelow. IfyouarereplacingatreethatwasrequiredasapartofanapprovedLandscapingPlan,thereplacementspeciesmustbeconsistentwiththeLandscapingPlan.Otherwise,thereplacementtreewillbedeterminedbytheCommunityDevelopmentDirector.” ProjectFeatures:Anewdevelopmentofsix,multi-storysingle-familyhomesisproposed.SiteplansA01-A12,tentativetractmapsTM1-TM4,andlandscapemapL1,dated6/16/2023werereviewedfortheinitialtreesurvey.Alltreespresentontheconstructionsiteareproposedforremoval.

KieltyArboristServicesLLCArboristReport2023 RevisedDate:8/7/20239

13.g
Packet Pg. 470
Attachment: Arborist Report (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue)

PROJECTPLANREVIEW
Redwoodtrees#9and#10aretoberetainedforthisproject.Theexistingsiteconditionshaveaconcretedrivewayimmediatelyadjacenttothetrees.Thedrivewayanditsassociatedcompactionhaslikelyhelpedtodiscouragerootgrowthinthisarea.Theexistingdrivewaynearthetreesisrecommendedtobecarefullyremovedbyhandunderthedirectsupervisionoftheprojectarboristwhenworkingwithin18’fromthetrees.Ajackhammercanbeusedtobreakthematerialintosmallhandmanageablesizedpieces.Allrootsencounteredduringthisprocessarerecommendedtostayasdamagefreeaspossible.Acceptablehandtoolsincluderotaryhammerwithclayspadeattachmentaswellasanairknife.Encounteredrootsshallbeexposedandwrapped/coveredinlayersofwetteddownburlaptohelpavoidrootdesiccation.Thecontractorisrecommendedtowetdowntheburlapdailywhileexposed.Pictureshowingexistingsiteconditionsneartrees Theproposedhomesonthelotaresetbackfarenoughawayfromtheredwoodtreesthatnoimpactsareexpectedfromtheproposedhomefoundations.Theproposedhomesneartheredwoodtreesareinthesamegenerallocationoftheexistinghomeonsite.Theareainbetweenthehomesandredwoodtreesistobecomealandscapedarea.Gravelpathwaysandapaverpatioisproposedbetweenthetreesandthehomes.AlloftheproposedhardscapesneartheretainedtreesarerecommendedtobeconstructedunderthedirectsupervisionoftheProjectArborist.Excavationisrecommendedtotakeplacebyhandincombinationwithanairknifewhenconstructingthepathwaysandpaverpatiowhenwithin18’fromtheretainedredwoodtrees.Thebaserocksectionfortheproposedhardscapesarerecommendedtobenodeeperthantheexistingbaserocksectionfortheexistingdriveway.Newbaserockshallthenbepackedaroundtreerootswhenencounteredwiththehardscapesbuiltontopofthetreerootzones.ThetreesarerecommendedtobeheavilyirrigatedunderthedirectionoftheProjectArboristwhilerootsareexposed.Everyotherweekduringthedryseasontheexposedsoilareaswithin18’fromthetreesarerecommendedtobeheavilysaturateduntilthetopfootofsoilissaturated.Impactsareexpectedtobeminorfortheredwoodtrees.Itisrecommendedtodeepwaterfertilizethetreesthefollowingspringaftertheconstructionhasbeencompleted.Thiswillhelptomitigatetheimpactstothetree.

KieltyArboristServicesLLCArboristReport2023 RevisedDate:8/7/202310

13.g
Packet Pg. 471
Attachment: Arborist Report (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue) TreeProtectionPlanforRedwoodTrees#9and#10:Treeprotectionzonesshouldbeestablishedandmaintainedthroughouttheentirelengthoftheproject.Fencingfortheprotectionzonesshouldbea6-foot-tallmetalchainlinktypesupportedby2-inchdiametermetalpolespoundedintothegroundtoadepthofnolessthan2feet.Thesupportpolesshouldbespacednomorethan10feetapartinthecenter.Thelocationfortheprotectionfencingfortheprotectedredwoodtreesduringthedemolitionphaseoftheprojectwillneedtobeplacedattheedgeoftheexistingconcretedrivewayandoutto18’fromthetreeswherepossible.Oncethedrivewayhasbeendemolished,thetreeprotectionfencingisrecommendedtobeexpandedouttotheproposedhomeswhilestillmaintainingatleastat3’pathwayforaccessbetweenthetreeprotectionfencingandtheproposedhomes.Thiswillallowaccessbetweenthetreesandtheproposedhomes.Duringthelandscapingphaseoftheproject,treeprotectionshallbereducedbacktotheedgeoftheproposedlandscapingwork.Noequipmentormaterialsshouldbestoredorcleanedinsideprotectionzones.Signsshouldbeplacedonfencingsignifying“TreeProtectionZone-KeepOut”.Iffencingneedstobereducedforaccessoranyotherreasons,thenon-protectedareasmustbeprotectedbyalandscapebuffer.Alltreeprotectionandinspectionschedulemeasures,designrecommendations,watering,andconstructionschedulesshallbeimplementedinfullbytheownerandcontractor.

LandscapeBufferWheretreeprotectiondoesnotcovertheentirerootzoneofthetreesatthedriplineorwhenasmallertreeprotectionzoneisneededforaccess,alandscapebufferconsistingofwoodchipsspreadtoadepthofsixincheswithplywoodorsteelplatesplacedontopwillbeplacedwherefoottrafficisexpectedtobeheavy.Thelandscapebufferwillhelptoreducecompactiontotheunprotectedrootzone.Ifplywoodisusedthepiecesofplywoodshallbeattachedinawaythatminimizesmovement.

TreePruning(notexpected)Duringconstruction,anyPruningwillbesupervisedbytheProjectArboristandmuststayunderneath20%ofthetreetotalfoliage.ANSIA300pruningstandardsarerequiredtobefollowedanytimeatreeistobepruned.

RootCuttingAllworkwithin18’oftheprotectedredwoodtreesonsitemustbedonebyhandundertheProjectArborist'ssupervision.Anyrootstobecutarerecommendedtobemonitoredanddocumentedwithinthisdistance.Rootstobecutmeasuringlargerthan1.5”indiametershallbeshowntotheProjectArboristbeforebeingcut.TheProjectarboristmayrecommendirrigationorfertilizingatthattime.Cutallrootscleanwithasaworloppers.Rootstobeleftexposedforaperiodoftimeshouldbecoveredwithlayersofburlapandkeptmoistdailybythecontractor.

KieltyArboristServicesLLCArboristReport2023 RevisedDate:8/7/202311

13.g
Packet Pg. 472
Attachment: Arborist Report (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue) TrenchingandExcavationTrenchingforirrigation,electrical,drainage,oranyotherreason,shouldbelocatedoutsideofthetree'sdriplinewhenpossible.Ifnotpossible,trenchingshallbehanddugwhenbeneaththedriplineofdesiredtrees.AnyexcavationunderneaththedriplineofaprotectedtreewillneedtobesupervisedbytheProjectArborist.Handdiggingandcarefulplacementofpipesbeloworbesideprotectedrootswilldramaticallyreducerootloss,thusreducingtraumatodesiredtrees.Trenchesshouldbebackfilledassoonaspossibleusingnativematerialsandcompactedtonearoriginallevels.Trenchestobeleftopenwithexposedrootsshallbecoveredwithburlapandkeptmoist.Plywoodlaidoverthetrenchwillhelptoprotectrootsbelow.Rootsretainedwithintrenchesarerecommendedtobewrappedinlayersofwetted-downburlaptoavoidrootdesiccation.Boringlinesmaybeanoptioniflinesaredeemedtooclosetotrees.

IrrigationImportedtrees-Onaconstructionsite,Irecommendirrigationduringwintermonths,1timepermonth.Seasonalrainfallmayreducetheneedforadditionalirrigation.Duringthewarmseason,April–November,myrecommendationistouseheavyirrigation,2timespermonth.Thistypeofirrigationshouldbestartedpriortoanyexcavation.Theirrigationwillimprovethevigorandwatercontentofthetrees.Theon-sitearboristmaymakeadjustmentstotheirrigationrecommendationsasneeded.Deepirrigationisrecommended.Thetopfootofthesoilshouldbesaturated.Theuseofsoakerhosesisrecommended.Thefoliageofthetreesmayneedcleaningifdustlevelsareextreme.Removingdustfromthefoliagewillhelptoreducemiteandinsectinfestation.

GradingAllexistinggradesunderneaththedriplineofaprotectedtreeshallremainasiswherepossible.Gradingwithinthedriplineofaprotectedtreeisrequiredtobedoneunderthesupervisionoftheprojectarborist.

InspectionsThesitewillbeinspectedafterthetreeprotectionmeasuresareinstalledandbeforethestartofconstruction.Itisthecontractor’sresponsibilitytonotifythesitearboristwhenconstructionistostart,andwheneverthereistobeworkperformedwithinthedriplineofaprotectedtreeon-siteatleast48hoursinadvance.Duringthesitevisitsthesitearboristwilloffermitigationmeasuresspecifictotheworkcompleted.KieltyArboristServicescanbereachedat650-532-4418,[email protected].

Thisinformationshouldbekepton-siteatalltimes.Theinformationincludedinthisreportisbelievedtobetrueandbasedonsoundarboriculturalprinciplesandpractices.

DavidBeckham DavidBeckham-August11th,2023
KieltyArboristServicesLLCArboristReport2023 RevisedDate:8/7/202312

13.g
Packet Pg. 473
Attachment: Arborist Report (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue) TREEPROTECTIONMAP:

Showingtreeprotectionfencingduringdemolition(left),showingtreeprotectionfencingexpandedduringconstruction(right).

KieltyArboristServicesLLCArboristReport2023 RevisedDate:8/7/202313

13.g
Packet Pg. 474
Attachment: Arborist Report (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue)

TREEWORKSTANDARDSANDQUALIFICATIONS
Toensurehigh-qualitytreework,includingremoval,pruning,andplanting,thefollowingstandardsandqualificationswillbeadheredto:● IndustryStandards:AlltreeworkwillbeperformedinaccordancewithindustrystandardsestablishedbytheInternationalSocietyofArboriculture(ISA).Thesestandardsencompassbestpracticesandguidelinesfortreecareandmaintenance.● ContractorLicensingandInsurance:ThecontractorundertakingthetreeworkmustpossessavalidStateofCaliforniaContractorsLicenseforTreeService(C61-D49)orLandscaping(C-27).Additionally,theymusthavecomprehensivegeneralliability,worker'scompensation,andcommercialauto/equipmentinsurancecoverage.● WorkmanshipStandards:ContractorsmustadheretothecurrentBestManagementPracticesoftheInternationalSocietyofArboriculture(ISA)andtheAmericanNationalStandardsInstitute(ANSI).Thesestandards,includingANSIA300andZ133.1,outlineguidelinesfortreepruning,fertilization,andsafety.Compliancewiththesestandardsensurestheuseofpropertechniquesandpracticesthroughoutthetreeworkprocess.

Byadheringtotheseestablishedstandardsandqualifications,wecanensuretheprovisionofprofessionalandsafetreeservicesthatmeettheindustry'sbestpracticesandpromotethehealthandlongevityofthetrees.

SCHEDULEOFINSPECTIONS
KieltyArboristsServicesLLC:

Wewillconductthefollowinginspectionsasneededfortheproject:
● Pre-EquipmentMobilization,DeliveryofMaterials,TreeRemoval,andSiteWork:Ourprojectarboristwillmeetwiththegeneralcontractorandownerstoreviewtreeprotectionmeasures.Wewillidentifyandmarktree-protectionzonefencing,specifyequipmentaccessroutesandstorageareas,andassesstheexistingconditionsoftreestodetermineanyadditionalnecessaryprotectionmeasures.● InspectionafterInstallationofTree-ProtectionFencing:Uponcompletionoftree-protectionfencinginstallation,ourprojectarboristwillinspectthesitetoensurethatallprotectionmeasuresarecorrectlyimplemented.Wewillalsoreviewanycontractorrequestsforaccesswithinthetreeprotectionzonesandassessanychangesintreehealthsincethepreviousinspection.● InspectionduringSoilExcavationorWorkPotentiallyAffectingProtectedTrees:Duringanyworkwithinnon-intrusionzonesofprotectedtrees,ourprojectarboristwillinspectthesiteanddocumenttheimplementedrecommendations.Wewillassessanychangesintreehealthsincethepreviousinspectiontomonitorthewell-beingofthetrees.● FinalSiteInspection:Priortoprojectcompletion,ourprojectarboristwillconductafinalsiteinspectiontoevaluatetreehealthandprovidenecessaryrecommendationstopromote KieltyArboristServicesLLCArboristReport2023 RevisedDate:8/7/202314

13.g
Packet Pg. 475
Attachment: Arborist Report (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue) theirlongevity.AcomprehensiveletterreportsummarizingourfindingsandconclusionswillbeprovidedtotheCityofCampbell.

Ourinspectionsaimtoensurepropertreeprotection,health,andadherencetoprojectrequirements.

CONCLUSIONS
Giventhatalltrees,exceptfortheredwoodtrees#9and#10,arebeingremovedfromtheproposedconstructionsite,itisnecessarytoreplacealltreesthatfallwithintheReplacementTreeRequirements,asdefinedintheCityofCampbellMunicipalCode.Trees#9&#10(redwoodtrees)measuredlargerthan12-inchesindiameter(asmeasured4-feetabovegrade)andwillbepreservedwithprotectivefencinginaccordancewiththetreeprotectionplandetailedbelow.Theothertreesmusteachbereplacedwithone24”boxtree(minimumsize).Accordingtotheprovidedlandscapeplan,mapL1,theprojectproposestoplantfournew24”boxtreesandfive15-gallonsizetrees,foratotalofninetreestomeetmitigationrequirements.Bydoingso,thedeveloperwillbeincompliancewiththeordinancesetforthbytheCityofCampbellPlanningDivision.Byfollowingthesesteps,thepropertyownerscanmaintainahealthytreepopulationthatincludesthepreservedredwoodtrees,addingvaluetothepropertyandbenefitingtheenvironment.

KieltyArboristServicesLLCArboristReport2023 RevisedDate:8/7/202315

13.g
Packet Pg. 476
Attachment: Arborist Report (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue)

SUPPORTINGPHOTOGRAPHS
KieltyArboristServicesLLCArboristReport2023 RevisedDate:8/7/202316

13.g
Packet Pg. 477
Attachment: Arborist Report (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue)

ASSUMPTIONSANDLIMITINGCONDITIONS
● LegalDescriptionsandTitles:Theconsultant/arboristassumestheaccuracyofanylegaldescriptionandtitlesprovided.Noresponsibilityisassumedforanylegalduediligence.Theconsultant/arboristshallnotbeheldliableforanydiscrepanciesorissuesarisingfromincorrectlegaldescriptionsorfaultytitles.● CompliancewithLawsandRegulations:Thepropertyisassumedtobeincompliancewithallapplicablecodes,ordinances,statutes,orothergovernmentregulations.Theconsultant/arboristisnotresponsibleforidentifyingorrectifyinganynon-compliance.● ReliabilityofInformation:Thoughdiligenteffortshavebeenmadetoobtainandverifyinformation,theconsultant/arboristisnotresponsibleforinaccuraciesorincompletedataprovidedbyexternalsources.Theclientacceptsfullresponsibilityforanydecisionsoractionstakenbasedonthisdata.● TestimonyorCourtAttendance:Theconsultant/arboristhasnoobligationtoprovidetestimonyorattendcourtregardingthisreportunlessmutuallyagreeduponthroughseparatewrittenagreements,whichmayincuradditionalfees.● ReportIntegrity:Unauthorizedalteration,loss,orreproductionofthisreportrendersitinvalid.Theconsultant/arboristshallnotbeliableforanyinterpretationsorconclusionsmadefromalteredreports.● RestrictedPublicationandUse:Thisreportisexclusivelyfortheuseoftheoriginalclient.Anyotheruseordissemination,withoutpriorwrittenconsentfromtheconsultant/arborist,isstrictlyprohibited.● Non-disclosuretoPublicMedia:Theclientisprohibitedfromusinganycontentofthisreport,includingtheconsultant/arborist'sidentity,inanypubliccommunicationwithoutpriorwrittenconsent.● Opinion-basedReport:Thereportrepresentstheindependent,professionaljudgmentoftheconsultant/arborist.Thefeeisnotcontingentuponanypre-determinedoutcomes,values,orevents.● VisualAidsLimitation:Visualaidsareforillustrativepurposesandshouldnotbeconsideredpreciserepresentations.Theyarenotsubstitutesforformalengineering,architectural,orsurveyreports.● InspectionLimitations:Theconsultant/arborist'sinspectionislimitedtovisibleandaccessiblecomponents.Non-invasivemethodsareused.Thereisnowarrantyorguaranteethatproblemswillnotdevelopinthefuture.

ARBORISTDISCLOSURESTATEMENT
Arboristsspecializeintheassessmentandcareoftreesusingtheireducation,knowledge,training,andexperience. ● LimitationsofTreeAssessment:Arboristscannotguaranteethedetectionofallconditionsthatcouldcompromiseatree’sstructureorhealth.Theconsultant/arboristmakesno KieltyArboristServicesLLCArboristReport2023 RevisedDate:8/7/202317

13.g
Packet Pg. 478
Attachment: Arborist Report (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue) warrantiesregardingthefutureconditionoftreesandshallnotbeliableforanyincidentsordamagesresultingfromtreefailures.● RemedialTreatmentsUncertainty:Remedialtreatmentsfortreeshavevariableoutcomesandcannotbeguaranteed.● ConsiderationsBeyondScope:Theconsultant/arborist'sservicesareconfinedtotreeassessmentandcare.Theclientassumesresponsibilityformattersinvolvingpropertyboundaries,ownership,disputes,andothernon-arboriculturalconsiderations.● InherentRisks:Livingneartreesinherentlyinvolvesrisks.Theconsultant/arboristisnotresponsibleforanyincidentsordamagesarisingfromsuchrisks.● Client’sResponsibility:Theclientisresponsibleforconsideringtheinformationandrecommendationsprovidedbytheconsultant/arboristandforanydecisionsmadeoractionstaken.

TheclientacknowledgesandacceptstheseAssumptionsandLimitingConditionsandArboristDisclosureStatement,recognizingthatrelianceuponthisreportisattheirownrisk.Theconsultant/arboristdisclaimsallwarranties,expressorimplied.

CERTIFICATION
Iherebycertifythatallthestatementsoffactinthisreportaretrue,complete,andcorrecttothebestofmyknowledgeandbelief,andaremadeingoodfaith.

DavidBeckham
DavidBeckham-August11th,2023
SignatureofConsultant
KieltyArboristServicesLLCArboristReport2023 RevisedDate:8/7/202318

13.g
Packet Pg. 479
Attachment: Arborist Report (PLN-2023-135 ~ 44-56 Sunnyside Avenue)

Page 1 of 4 ends

Campbell City CouncilJanuary 22, 2024

Campbell City Council
January 22, 2024