Campbell City Council
December 3, 2024

Shipping Locations
Location Number Street City State Zip Country
1 70 N 1st St Campbell CA 95008-1458 USA
Payment Details
Dec 2025
Invoice Plan Item Description Qty Subtotal Tax Total
Upfront 101391 AXON RESPOND - FUSUSCORE - ELITE AI 2.0 44TB HDD STORAGE 1 $4,262.50 $399.61 $4,662.11 Upfront 101424 AXON RESPOND - FUSUSCORE - EXTENDED WARRANTY 1 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Total $4,262.50 $399.61 $4,662.11

13.c
Packet Pg. 162
Attachment: Fusus Core Elite AI 11.22.24 (Campbell Community Center Public Safety Camera System)

Tax is estimated based on rates applicable at date of quote and subject to change at time of invoicing. If a tax exemption certificate should be applied, please submit prior to invoicing.

Standard Terms and Conditions
Axon Enterprise Inc. Sales Terms and Conditions
Axon Master Services and Purchasing Agreement:

This Quote is limited to and conditional upon your acceptance of the provisions set forth herein and Axon’s Master Services and Purchasing Agreement (posted at https://www.axon.com/sales-terms-and-conditions), as well as the attached Statement of Work (SOW) for Axon Fleet and/or Axon Interview Room purchase, if applicable. In the event you and Axon have entered into a prior agreement to govern all future purchases, that agreement shall govern to the extent it includes the products and services being purchased and does not conflict with the Axon Customer Experience Improvement Program Appendix as described below.

ACEIP:

The Axon Customer Experience Improvement Program Appendix, which includes the sharing of de-identified segments of Agency Content with Axon to develop new products and improve your product experience (posted at www.axon.com/legal/sales-terms-and-conditions), is incorporated herein by reference. By signing below, you agree to the terms of the Axon Customer Experience Improvement Program.

Acceptance of Terms:

Any purchase order issued in response to this Quote is subject solely to the above referenced terms and conditions. By signing below, you represent that you are lawfully able to enter into contracts. If you are signing on behalf of an entity (including but not limited to the company, municipality, or government agency for whom you work), you represent to Axon that you have legal authority to bind that entity. If you do not have this authority, please do not sign this Quote.

13.c
Packet Pg. 163
Attachment: Fusus Core Elite AI 11.22.24 (Campbell Community Center Public Safety Camera System)

\s1\ \d1\
Signature Date Signed
11/22/2024

13.c
Packet Pg. 164
Attachment: Fusus Core Elite AI 11.22.24 (Campbell Community Center Public Safety Camera System) City
Council
Report
TITLE: Resolution Commending Carlos Castaneda for 22 Years of Service to the City of Campbell (Resolution/Roll Call Vote)

RECOMMENDED ACTION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution commending Carlos Castaneda for his 22 years of outstanding service to the City of Campbell.

DISCUSSION
Carlos Castaneda began his career with the City of Campbell on July 1, 2002, as a Park Maintenance Worker I in the Public Works Department’s Parks Maintenance Section.

He was later promoted to Park Maintenance Worker II on September 5, 2005, a position he held for nearly 20 years.

Throughout his 22 years with the City, Carlos provided essential daily maintenance for many of Campbell’s parks and median islands and assisted with special projects that have greatly enhanced the beauty and quality of the City’s parks that are still evident to this day. For the last several years, Carlos has focused his efforts on Edith Morley and Stojanovich parks and regularly coordinated and worked with volunteer groups to provide improvements to these facilities.

Carlos has demonstrated exceptional professionalism and unwavering support among both colleagues and Campbell residents alike – becoming a highly valued member of the Parks Maintenance team and playing a crucial role in the City’s efforts to maintain and preserve its diverse outdoor recreational spaces.

On September 30, 2024, Carlos retired after a distinguished 22-year career with the City of Campbell’s Public Works Department – Parks Maintenance Section. In recognition of this achievement, staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution commending Carlos for his 22 years of outstanding service to the City of Campbell and for the lasting impact of his contributions to the Campbell community.

Prepared by:

Item: 14
Category: CONSENT CALENDAR
Meeting Date: December 3, 2024
14 Packet Pg. 165
Carina Shattuck, Administrative Analyst I
Resolution Commending Carlos Castaneda for 22 Years of Service to the City of Campbell Page 2 of 2
Reviewed by:

Todd Capurso, Director of Public Works
Approved by:

Brian Loventhal, City Manager
Attachment:
a. Resolution
14 Packet Pg. 166

RESOLUTION NO.

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CAMPBELL COMMENDING CARLOS CASTANEDA FOR HIS 22 YEARS OF SERVICE TO THE CITY OF CAMPBELL.

WHEREAS, Carlos Castaneda began his career with the City of Campbell on July 1, 2002, as a Park Maintenance Worker I in the Public Works Department’s Parks Maintenance section; and

WHEREAS, throughout his 22 years with the City, Carlos provided essential daily maintenance for Campbell’s parks and median islands, and assisted with special projects that have enhanced the beauty and quality of the City’s parks; and

WHEREAS, Carlos has demonstrated exceptional professionalism and unwavering support among colleagues and Campbell residents alike , becoming a highly valued member of the Parks Maintenance team and their efforts to maintain and preserve the City’s outdoor recreational spaces; and

WHEREAS, On September 30, 2024, Carlos retired after a distinguished 22 -year career with the City of Campbell’s Public Works Department – Parks Maintenance section; and

WHEREAS, in recognition of this achievement , staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution commending Carlos for h is years of outstanding service to the City of Campbell and the lasting impact of his contributions to this community.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Campbell hereby commends Carlos Castaneda for his 22 years of service to the City of Campbell.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 3rd day of December, 2024, by the following roll call vote:

AYES: Councilmembers:

NOES: Councilmembers:

ABSENT: Councilmembers:

APPROVED:
_________________________________
Susan M. Landry, Mayor

ATTEST:
___________________________
Andrea Sanders, City Clerk

14.a
Packet Pg. 167
Attachment: Resolution (Resolution Commending Carlos Castaneda for 22 Years of Service to the City of Campbell) City
Council
Report
TITLE: Resolution in Support of Build the Future's Efforts to Provide Childcare in Santa Clara County (Resolution/Roll Call Vote)

RECOMMENDED ACTION
That the City Council adopt a resolution supporting Build the Future's efforts to provide universal childcare to all children and families in the County of Santa Clara and the State of California.

BACKGROUND
Build the Future is a movement that seeks to help Santa Clara County residents by advocating for funding and policies to provide childcare for all. A 2021 survey revealed that two -thirds of Santa Clara County employees are unable to achieve their career goals due to the stress of balancing work and childcare. In addition to this, a 2023 report detailed that the shortage of childcare poses a great economic threat in lost earnings, productivity, and revenue, which equates to $15 billion to the State of California and $3 billion to the County of Santa Clara.

DISCUSSION
Build the Future has organized an outreach and communications campaign to build a base of supporters who understand the critical need for affordable childcare. As a part of this campaign, resolutions are created to share with local governments to call on their assistance to prioritize the actions needed to provide every family with access to quality and affordable childcare. As a result, resolutions have been passed by cities in Santa Clara County, including the cities of Gilroy, Los Altos, Los Altos Hills, Milpitas, Morgan Hill, Mountain View, Palo Alto, San Jose, Santa Clara, and Saratoga. Although the proposed draft resolution does not make specific policy or financial commitments, it does express the City’s support for the efforts of Build the Future.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with this action.

Item: 15
Category: CONSENT CALENDAR
Meeting Date: December 3, 2024
15 Packet Pg. 168
Build the Future Resolution Page 2 of 2
Prepared by:

Jose Zetino, Administrative Analyst
Approved by:

Brian Loventhal, City Manager
Attachment:
a. Build the Future Resolution
15 Packet Pg. 169

RESOLUTION NO.

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CAMPBELL SUPPORTING BUILD THE FUTURE’S EFFORTS TO PROVIDE UNIVERSAL

CHILDCARE TO ALL CHILDREN AND FAMILIES IN THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA

AND THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
WHEREAS, the Council for a Strong America issued a report in early 2023 which details that the shortage of infant -toddler childcare costs the United States $122 billion in lost earnings, productivity, and revenue every year; and
WHEREAS, this shortage translates to a $15 billion economic threat to California and a $3 billion threat to Santa Clara County; and
WHEREAS, a family living in Silicon Valley needs to pay an average of $26,450 per year for infant care and $21,900 per year for one preschooler's childcare; and WHEREAS, the two most significant monthly expenses faced by working families are rent and childcare; and
WHEREAS, the lack of an affordable childcare options leads to underemployment, greater housing instability, less consumer spending, depressed business productivity and the near impossibility of seeking, securing and maintaining employment; and WHEREAS, investing in affordable childcare provides vital infrastructure to working parents and supports early childhood development, allows families to remain in a geographic area, creates a stronger economy, improves business productivity and consumer spending, decreases poverty, leads to safer communities, and provides additional revenue for cities; and
WHEREAS, cities have a direct interest in building strong local economies, supporting and benefiting from local small businesses, attracting and retaining families and employers; and WHEREAS, one of the most impactful tools we can deploy to solve our greatest economic and societal challenges is investing in broadly accessible, high-quality childcare immediately; and
WHEREAS, investments in the childcare sector should prioritize supporting our most underserved children and their families, including but not limited to families of color, families of children with special needs, low -income families, unhoused families, and undocumented families; and
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Campbell City Council supports Build the Future’s efforts to provide universal childcare to all children and families in the County of Santa Clara and the State of California; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Campbell will support Build the Future’s efforts to ensure that every family who seeks childcare is able to receive it by advocating for more affordable childcare slots; and

15.a
Packet Pg. 170
Attachment: Build the Future Resolution (Build the Future Resolution)

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Campbell recognizes the effort to develop more center-based and home-based childcare facilities to open in Campbell; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Campbell recognizes the importance of childcare businesses in this city; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Campbell supports Build the Future Santa Clara County in their efforts advocating for comprehensive and collaborative solutions to solve our childcare crisis and their efforts in building a coalition of stakeholders to identify and implement solutions to this economic and social crisis.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this , by the following roll call vote:

AYES: Councilmembers:

NOES: Councilmembers:

ABSENT: Councilmembers:

ABSTAIN: Councilmembers:

APPROVED: _________________________
Susan M. Landry, Mayor
ATTEST:

Andrea Sanders, City Clerk

15.a
Packet Pg. 171
Attachment: Build the Future Resolution (Build the Future Resolution)

City
Council
Report

TITLE: Public Hearing to Consider the Request of Mark Stevenson to Allow the Operation of a Chiropractic and Acupuncture Office (“Medical Services, Clinics” Use) on the Ground Floor of an Existing Commercial Tenant Space (Otherwise Restricted to an Upper Floor) Within a Historic "Structure of Merit" Commonly Known as the “Grizzle Court Duplex” on Property Located at 35 S. First Street, and in the CB-MU (Central Business Mixed Use) Zoning District. File No.:

PLN-2024-62. (Resolution/Roll Call Vote)

RECOMMENDED ACTION

The Historic Preservation Board and the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council adopt a Resolution approving a Zoning Exception and Conditional Use Permit to allow the operation of a chiropractic and acupuncture office (“Medical Services, Clinics” use) on the ground floor of an existing commercial tenant space, as well as approving a permit fee waiver request to retroactively refund the Historic Zoning Exception Fee.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
Staff recommends that the City Council accept the determination that this application is Categorically Exempt under Section 15301 (Class 1) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), pertaining to the operation, repair, maintenance, permitting, leasing, licensing, or minor alteration of an existing private structure.

PROJECT DATA

Zoning Designation: CB-MU (Central Business Mixed-Use)
General Plan Designation: Central Business Mixed-Use (26-33 Units/Gross Acre) Net Lot Area: 2,900 square-feet
Proposed Required
Parking: None Exempt1

BACKGROUND

1 The Project Site is located within a one-half mile of the Downtown Campbell Station along the Green Line light rail route, and therefore not subject to the City’s parking requirement per AB 2097.

Item: 16
Category: PUBLIC HEARINGS AND

INTRODUCTION OF

ORDINANCES
Meeting Date: December 3, 2024
16 Packet Pg. 172
PLN-2024-62 35 S. First Street Page 2 of 11
Project Site: The 2,900 square -foot project site is located along the west side of South First Street, between East Campbell Avenue and Orchard City Drive, within the Downtown Campbell Development Plan boundary, as shown on the aerial map, below.

The property is located within the City’s central business district, generally surrounded by a variety of commercial businesses including retail businesses and restaurants to the north, and adjacent to two City owned surface parking lots to the south and east.

1Aerial Map
Historic Significance : The Grizzle Court Duplex is a designated historic “structure of merit” listed on the City’s Historic Resource Inventory list , identified as emblematic of Campbell's former fruit processing industry, a major economic driver between the 1880s and the 1950s, in the Historic Landmark Designation Resolution (reference Attachment B – Resolution No. 4). Constructed in 1927 by Claude Grizzle, the duplex historically provided affordable rental housing for cannery workers.

Architecturally, the duplex embodies the court design typical of 1920s Southern California, incorporating elements of the California Mission and Spanish Revival styles as identified in the Department of Parks and Recreation Form (reference Attachment C – DPR Form). Noteworthy features include a flat roof, and comprehensive high -quality stucco work covering the entire exterior, contrasting with the more common practice of only finishing the facade. The use of original materials and details, such as porch lights and wooden-frame doors, further contribute to the building’s historical integrity. 16 Packet Pg. 173
PLN-2024-62 35 S. First Street Page 3 of 11

2 Building Facade Facing S. First Street
In addition to its architectural importance, the duplex holds social significance for its role in providing affordable housing to generations of cannery workers, thereby reflecting the economic and social fabric of Campbell's early 20th-century labor force.

Property Background: The property was constructed as a residential duplex in 1927 and designated as a historic resource on May 6, 2014, by the City Council via Resolution No. 11676. On May 7, 1992, a business license was issued for a “professional office” (Miracle Method) for the southerly tenant space located at 45 South First Street. This conversion from residential to commercial use was not accompanied by either a Use Permit or Building Permit, making the commercial activity mistakenly unpermitted.

On November 9, 2004, the northerly tenant space located at 35 South First Street received a Conditional Use Permit (PLN2004 -143) for a change in use from residential to commercial (a “personal services” use – day spa with massage services). This use was entitled under Resolution No. 3606 (reference Attachment D), and Building Permit BLD-2004-01213 was obtained to establish the tenant space as commercial.

The tenant space, located at 45 South First Street, subsequently reverted back to residential use after a period of unpermitted commercial activity. Since no formal permits were issued for the commercial conversion, the space remains classified as residential.

DISCUSSION
Proposal: This application seeks approval of a Conditional Use Permit to allow a chiropractic and acupuncture office (“medical services, clinics” use) on the ground floor of an existing commercial space. Although the property’s CB -MU zoning allows medical offices, they are restricted to the upper floo rs. However, through a concurrent request for a Zoning Exception, the applicant is seeking permission to allow the ground -floor 16 Packet Pg. 174
PLN-2024-62 35 S. First Street Page 4 of 11
location in consideration of the historic designation of the building. Per the Project Plans (reference Attachment E), no exterior or interior changes are proposed to the building.

Administrative Procedure : Listed under the "Incentives for preserving Historic Resources" section of the Historic Preservation Ordinance ( CMC Sec. 21.33.150 ), a Zoning Exception is a land use permit intended to "provide a degree of flexibility from the Zoning Ordinance as necessary to minimize impact to the historic character of a historic resource." This mechanism may be utilized to consider a deviation from any zoning code standard, provided that the City Council, as the decision -making body, can affirmatively establish the findings for approval, as discussed under 'Analysis'.

As stated above, medical service is a conditionally allowed use on upper floors, but not permitted on ground floors of buildings within the CB -MU Zoning District. However, as the property is historic, the applicant is seeking relief from this section of the zoning code to allow a medical use on the ground floor. A Historic Resource Alteration Permit is not required for this proposal since the change of use does not directly "alter" the historic residence, as specified by CMC Sec. 21.33.080.

Under the "Incentives for Preserving Historic Resources" section of the Historic Preservation Ordinance ( CMC Sec. 21.33.150 ), applicants may request City Council consideration for a full or partial waiver of application processing fees. This economic incentive is available to historic property owners when the City Council determines that such a waiver would advance the goals of the Historic Preservation Ordinance and the General Plan. As part of this application, the applicant is also requesting a retroactive partial waiver of the application processing fees, specifically seeking a refund of the Historic Zoning Exception Fee, totaling $1,896.00.

ANALYSIS
Findings for Approval : In order to recommend approval of the application, the Council must affirmatively determine the project meets findings for approval. Findings establish the evidentiary basis for a City's decision to grant or deny a land use approval and to impose conditions of approval necessary to meet the findings.

Zoning Exception (CMC Sec. 21.33.150B.2): Prior approving of a Zoning Exception, the City Council must first affirmatively establish all five (5) of the findings described in italics below. An explanation of how the project meets each finding is provided.

1. The zoning exception will facilitate development and use of a historic resource in a manner that is more consistent with its historic character than would be possible under strict compliance with the Zoning Ordinance; Yes. The proposed Zoning Exception will support the adaptive reuse of the Grizzle Court Duplex, recognized for its significance in Campbell’s history as housing for cannery workers during the city’s fruit processing era. The proposed use, a chiropractic and acupuncture office, is consistent with the building's historic character by offering a community -serving, low-intensity use, reflective of its original purpose of providing services to local residents. 16 Packet Pg. 175
PLN-2024-62 35 S. First Street Page 5 of 11
Strict compliance with the Zoning Ordinance would prohibit medical uses on the ground floor, but granting this exception ensures the building’s function remains consistent with its historical role as a community-serving space.

Alternatively, if a r etail or restaurant use was proposed, it would likely demand significant changes, such as ventilation for kitchen facilities, larger storefront windows, and more prominent signage or exterior lighting. These adjustments could disrupt key architectural elements, such as the original stucco finish, flat roof design, and wooden-frame doors, which are integral to the building’s historic character and contribute to its designation as a "structure of merit." Additionally, the installation of a compliant trash enclosure required for food serving uses could impact the site’s layout and detract from its preserved historic features.

In contrast, the chiropractic and acupuncture office provides a low -intensity use that allows the building to maintain its original materials, features, and spatial relationships. Importantly, this adaptive reuse avoids unnecessary alterations to the building's external and internal structure, thereby preserving its historical and architectural integrity. Furthermore, this plan adheres to the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation , which prioritize maintaining a building’s historic character while accommodating modern uses.

2. The zoning exception will not adversely impact property or public rights -of-way in the surrounding neighborhood or within a historic district; Yes. The proposed medical services clinic," use, limited to a chiropractic and acupuncture office, is low-intensity activity that would operate on an appointment- only basis. This operational structure minimizes foot traffic and activity, significantly reducing the potential for disruption compared to higher -intensity uses, such as retail or restaurants protecting the public rights -of-way from excessive traffic or congestion. The office will maintain standard business hours, avoiding late -night or extended operations that could generate noise or disrupt the neighborhood. As a chiropractic office, this medical use will not utilize single - use medical supplies and therefore will not increase the existing trash demands of the site necessitating the construction of a compliant trash enclosure consistent with Director’s Interpretation No. 9 . Additionally, the proposed use is compatible with the building's historical residential function as a duplex, maintaining the low -impact nature of the property within its historic context. This further supports its minimal impact on the historic district’s integrity in line with the following recommendation from the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation:

Recommendation: Retaining the historic relationship between buildings and landscape features in the setting. For example, preserving the relationship between a town common or urban plaza and the adjacent houses, municipal buildings, roads, and landscape and streetscape features. 16 Packet Pg. 176
PLN-2024-62 35 S. First Street Page 6 of 11

3. The zoning exception will not negatively impact the integrity or historic characteristics of the historic resource;
Yes. The proposed zoning exception will not negatively impact the integrity or historic characteristics of the property. The building retains important architectural features, including its original stucco, flat roof form, and wooden - frame doors. The intended use as a chiropractic and acupuncture office does not require any exterior or significant interior modifications, allowing these features to remain intact.

This adaptive reuse is consistent with The Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties , which support new uses that maintain a building's historical and architectural integrity. By retaining the original materials, features, and spatial relationships of the Grizzle Court Duplex, the proposal upholds these standards. Additionally, the General Plan Policy emphasizes the importance of either using a historic property as it was historically or finding a new use that preserves its distinctive qualities.

Standard 1): A property will be used as it was historically, or be given a new use that maximizes the retention of distinctive materials, features, spaces and spatial relationships. Where a treatment and use have not been identified, a property will be protected and, if necessary, stabilized until additional work may be undertaken.

Given that no alterations are needed to accommodate the new use, the zoning exception ensures that the building’s historic character is preserved. Therefore, the proposed exception aligns with both preservation standards and city policies, and it will not harm the integrity or historic characteristics of the Grizzle Court Duplex.

4. The zoning exception is the minimum departure from the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance; and
Yes. The proposed medical use constitutes the minimum departure from the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance, as a medical office is an allowable use in the CB -MU Zoning District, but simply not on the ground floor. Moreover, the chiropractic and acupuncture office closely resembles the operational characteristics of a personal services use which is permitted within the CB -MU Zoning District. Personal services are allowed due to their client -facing nature, small scale, and minimal operational impact. The proposed medical use operates similarly, involving routine appointments, direct client interactions, and a limited operational footprint. As such, the proposed use aligns with the intent of the ordinance to allow low -intensity, individualized services that are compatible with the character of the district. Therefore, the proposed medical use satisfies the criteria for a zoning exception.
16 Packet Pg. 177
PLN-2024-62 35 S. First Street Page 7 of 11

5. The zoning exception is in conformance with the General Plan, adopted area plan, and applicable design guidelines.

Yes. The proposed use is consistent with General Plan policies that support the adaptive reuse of historic buildings to prevent disuse or deterioration. By accommodating a medical clinic in a preserved building, the project aligns with the General Plan’s goals of fostering a vibrant and economically viable downtown area that respects historic resources. This balance between historic preservation and contemporary functionality enhances the Downtown’s community character and furthering the following General Plan polices:

Policy CD-1.6 Preserve, rehabilitate or restore the city’s historic buildings, landmarks, districts and cultural resources and retain the architectural integrity of established building patterns within historic residential neighborhoods to preserve the cultural heritage of the community.

Policy CD-1.7 Encourage adaptive reuse of and incorporation of the city’s historic buildings and structures for new development
projects, when feasible.

Policy CD-2.1 Recognize, enhance, and preserve, where possible, natural features and ecosystems, and protect cultural and historic resources.

Action COS-5.g Continue to implement the city’s Historic Preservation Ordinance and periodically review and modify the Ordinance as necessary in order to ensure that it continues to meet the city’s historic preservation goals, including creation of a penalty provision to discourage the unlawful alteration or demolition of designated properties.

Goal LU-4: To promote and assist the restoration and protection of the historic character and elements that embodies the
Downtown and characterizes it as a unique place.

Policy LU-4.1: Downtown Character: Require new development to be sensitive to the unique character that defines Downtown Campbell.

Strategy LU-4.1a: The historic character of Downtown shall be preserved through the protection and restoration of its historic buildings and landmarks.

Goal D-4: To retain and reinforce the historic context of the Downtown and build on the established framework that is characterized by its established historic landmarks
16 Packet Pg. 178
PLN-2024-62 35 S. First Street Page 8 of 11
Policy D-4.1: Historic Preservation and Redevelopment Compatibility:

The small town character of Downtown Campbell shall be
maintained by encouraging the preservation of important historic resources, promoting the improvement of existing properties and businesses, and encouraging new
development compatible in design with existing and newly approved development.

Conditional Use Permit (CMC Section 21.46.040):, Prior to approving a Conditional Use Permit, the City Council must first affirmatively establish all six (6) of the findings described in italics below. An explanation of how the project meets each finding is provided.

1. The proposed use is allowed within the applicable zoning district with Conditional Use Permit approval, and complies with all other applicable provisions of this Zoning Code and the Campbell Municipal Code;
Yes. The proposed chiropractic and acupuncture office is an allowed use within the CB-MU (Central Business Mixed Use) zoning district, subject to approval of a Conditional Use Permit (CUP). Although medical services are restricted to upper floors in this district, with approval of a Zoning Exception, as discussed, above, it would be allowable.

2. The proposed use is consistent with the General Plan; Yes. The General Plan Land Use designation of Central Business Mixed -Use, which focuses on shopping, service, and entertainment uses in a pedestrian - oriented urban environment, is suitable for a chiropractic office. This designation encourages commercial uses on the ground floor with residential uses on upper floors. Since a chiropractic office is a service -oriented business, it fits well into the ground floor commercial space in this mixed -use setting. Moreover, the emphasis on pedestrian accessibility in this designation aligns well with the nature of a chiropractic office, which typically benefits from high visibility and easy access for clients. The applicant’s proposal may also be found to further the following General Plan policies and strategies:

Policy LU-1.10: Maintain a variety of attractive and convenient commercial and office uses that provide needed goods, services, and entertainment for residents and visitors.

Action LU-4.a Update the Downtown Development Plan to retain and emphasize an intensification of pedestrian -oriented uses in the Downtown. Encourage office, civic, and cultural uses to locate Downtown and emphasize the integration of these
high-activity uses.

Policy ED-2.5: Encourage retention and expansion of local businesses as appropriate to provide a range of jobs and services to
16 Packet Pg. 179
PLN-2024-62 35 S. First Street Page 9 of 11
residents, to retain revenue in the city, and respond to community needs for key amenities and services.

3. The proposed site is adequate in terms of size and shape to accommodate the fences and walls, landscaping, parking and loading facilities, yards, and other development features required in order to integrate the use with uses in the surrounding area;
Yes. The project site is an existing property that already is adequate to accommodate fences, walls, landscaping, parking and loading facilities, and yards necessary to accommodate the proposed medical service, clinic use. No new development features are proposed. The proposed use will not result in any adverse effects on the existing site. All existing elements are in compliance with CMC Chapter 21.18 (Site Development Standards) such as fences, walls, and lighting. Maintaining these features as they are ensures continued integration with surrounding development.

4. The proposed site is adequately served by streets of sufficient capacity to carry the kind and quantity of traffic the use would be expected to generate; Yes. Allowing a new chiropractic office at the proposed location is not anticipated to result in an appreciable increase in the amount of traffic generated by the business. The tenant space is only approximately 565 square feet with two exam rooms.

5. The design, location, size, and operating characteristics of the proposed use are compatible with the existing and future land uses on -site and in the vicinity of the subject property; and
Yes. The proposed chiropractic office will maintain the same interior floorplan as the previous personal service establishment. While typically, the Downtown Campbell Development Plan & Standards calls for large, windowed storefronts to reinforce the pedestrian nature of the street, the building was originally constructed as a residence, and does not maintain any commercial displays.

Generally, introducing a medical office to a commercial center might reduce foot traffic, adversely affecting nearby restaurants and retail stores. However, in this case, the previous and surrounding businesses are similarly considered personal services and operate by appointment only, indicating no expected change in foot traffic. Additionally, the proposed office doesn't require substantial interior modifications, allowing easy adaptability to other uses compatible with the CB - MU Zoning District if necessary. The office's design and operations demonstrate its suitability within the existing and envisioned use of the area.

6. The establishment, maintenance, or operation of the proposed use at the location proposed will not be detrimental to the comfort, health, morals, peace, safety, or general welfare of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use, or be detrimental or injurious to property and improvements in the neighborhood or to the general welfare of the city.
16 Packet Pg. 180
PLN-2024-62 35 S. First Street Page 10 of 11
Yes. Although the Municipal Code does not provide standard operational requirements for the “medical services, clinic” use, the proposal should not create a nuisance due to “the emissions of dust, fumes, glare, heat, liquids, noise, odor, smoke, steam, vibrations, or similar disturbances” CMC Section 21.46.040 (Findings and decision). Therefore, staff does not anticipate that the business will create a nuisance relative to noise and traffic.

Permit Fee Waivers ( CMC Section 21.46.040 ):, Prior to the approval of a Permit Fee Waiver, the City Council must first affirmatively establish the below finding described in italics below. An explanation of how the project meets the finding is provided.

1. Such waiver would advance the purposes of the Historic Preservation Ordinance and the General Plan.

Yes. The proposed waiver is for fees associated with the Zoning Exception (and not the accompanying Conditional Use Permit). Staff supports the request as the application allows for adaptive reuse of a historic building and the cost recovery for staff time spent processing the application has been compensated through the Conditional Use Permit fees that were paid. By minimizing redundant costs, the waiver supports efficient and focused resource allocation, further facilitating historic preservation efforts.

This also aligns with the Historic Preservation Ordinance's goal of promoting the conservation of cultural heritage and the General Plan's vision for preserving the unique character of the downtown area.

Historic Preservation Board Meeting : At its November 4, 2024, meeting, the Historic Preservation Board reviewed this application and unanimously passed a resolution recommending approval to the City Council. The resolution acknowledges the project as an example of adaptive reuse and emphasizes the incentives available to historic property owners, highlighting the benefits these offer.

Planning Commission Meeting : At its November 12, 2024, meeting, the Planning Commission reviewed this application and unanimously passed a resolution recommending approval to the City Council. The resolution acknowledges the proposed medical use as comparable to a personal services use, and would be complimentary to the Downtown.

Public Comment: The project was noticed to all property owners within 300 feet of the subject property and publicized in the newspaper (Metro). No public comment was received on this application.

Prepared by:
16 Packet Pg. 181
Larissa Lomen, Assistant Planner
PLN-2024-62 35 S. First Street Page 11 of 11
Reviewed by:

Rob Eastwood, Community
Development Director
Approved by:

Brian Loventhal, City Manager
Attachment:
a. Draft Resolution
b. Resolution No. 4
c. DPR Form
d. Resolution No. 3606
e. Project Plans
16 Packet Pg. 182
RESOLUTION NO.

BEING A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

CAMPBELL APPROVING A ZONING EXCEPTION AND

CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW THE OPERATION OF A
CHIROPRACTIC AND ACUPUNCTURE OFFICE (“MEDICAL
SERVICES, CLINICS” USE) ON THE GROUND FLOOR OF AN

EXISTING COMMERCIAL TENANT SPACE (OTHERWISE

RESTRICTED TO AN UPPER FLOOR) WITHIN A HISTORIC
"STRUCTURE OF MERIT" COMMONLY KNOWN AS THE GRIZZLE
COURT DUPLEX ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 35 S. FIRST

STREET, AND IN THE CB -MU (CENTRAL BUSINESS MIXED USE)

ZONING DISTRICT AS WELL AS APPROVING A PERM FEE

WAIVER REQUET TO RETROACTIVELY REFUND THE HISTORIC
ZONING EXCEPTION FEE. FILE NO.: PLN-2024-62

After notification and public hearing, as specified by law and after presentation by the Community Development Director, proponents and opponents, the hearing was closed.

The City Council finds as follows with regard to the recommended approval of a Zoning Exception, Conditional Use Permit, and Permit Fee Waiver Request:

1. The project site is a 2,900 square-foot parcel located along the west side of South First Street, between East Campbell Avenue and Orchard City Drive, within the Downtown Campbell Development Plan boundary.

2. The Project Site is zoned CB-MU (Central Business Mixed Use) as shown on the Campbell Zoning Map.

3. The Project Site is designated Central Business Mixed-Use (26-33 Units/Gr. Acre) as shown on the City of Campbell General Plan Land Use diagram.

4. The property at 35 S. First Street is currently developed with a duplex, known as the Grizzle Court Duplex , which was constructed around 1927. The property was designated a historic resource on May 6, 2014, through City Council Resolution No. 11676.

5. The Grizzle Court Duplex, holds historical significance as part of Campbell’s early 20th-century labor housing, specifically providing accommodations for cannery workers. Architecturally, it represents the California Mission and Spanish Revival styles, with features such as high-quality stucco and original wooden-frame doors.

6. Originally constructed as a residential duplex, a use permit (UP 82 -27) was filed to convert the property from residential to commercial (unspecified office use). The applicant later withdrew the application, and the Planning Commission upheld withdrawal subsequently denying the permit at the January 25, 1983, Planning Commission Meeting, via Resolution No. 2166.

16.a
Packet Pg. 183
Attachment: Draft Resolution (PLN-2024-62 35 S. First Street) City Council Resolution No. Page 2 of 6
PLN-2024-62 ~ 35 S. First St.

Zoning Exception & Conditional Use Permit & Permit Fee Waiver Request

7. On May 7, 1992, a business license was issued for a “professional office” (Miracle Method) for the southerly tenant space located at 45 South First Street. This conversion from residential to commercial use was not accompanied by either a Use Permit or Building Permit, making the commercial activity mistakenly unpermitted.

8. On November 9, 2004, the northerly tenant space located at 35 South First Street received a Conditional Use Permit (PLN2004 -143) for a change in use from residential to commercial (a “personal services” use – day spa with massage services). This use was entitled under Resolution No. 3606 (reference Attachment D), and Building Permit BLD -2004-01213 was obtained to establish the tenant space as commercial.

9. The tenant space, located at 45 South First Street, subsequently reverted back to residential use after a period of unpermitted commercial activity. Since no formal permits were issued for the commercial conversion, the space remains classified as residential.

10. This application seeks approval of a Conditional Use Permit to allow a chiropractic and acupuncture office (“medical services, clinics” use) on the ground floor of an existing commercial space. Although the property’s CB -MU zoning allows medical offices, they are not permitted on the ground floor. However, through a concurrent request for a Zoning Exception, the applicant is seeking permission to allow the ground-floor location in consideration of the historic designation of the building.

11. Listed under the "Incentives for preserving Historic Resources" section of the Historic Preservation Ordinance ( CMC Sec. 21.33.150 ), a Zoning Exception is a land use permit intended to "provide a degree of flexibility from the Zoning Ordinance as necessary to minimize impact to the historic character of a historic resource." This mechanism may be utilized to consider a deviation from any zoning code standard, provided that the City Council, as the decision -making body, can affirmatively establish the findings for approval, as discussed under 'Analysis'.

12. A Historic Resource Alteration Permit is not required for this proposal since the change of use does not directly "alter" the historic residence, as specified by CMC Sec. 21.33.080, and no exterior changes are proposed.

13. Given its historic status and unique architecture, the property’s adaptive reuse aligns with the city's goals of preserving historic resources while allowing flexibility to support viable, low-impact commercial uses.

14. Furthermore, proposed project adheres to the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation, which prioritize maintaining a building’s historic character while accommodating modern uses.

15. The chiropractic and acupuncture office closely resembles the operational characteristics of a personal services use which is permitted within the CB -MU Zoning District. Personal services are allowed due to their client -facing nature, small scale, and minimal operational impact. The proposed medical use operates similarly,

16.a
Packet Pg. 184
Attachment: Draft Resolution (PLN-2024-62 35 S. First Street) City Council Resolution No. Page 3 of 6
PLN-2024-62 ~ 35 S. First St.

Zoning Exception & Conditional Use Permit & Permit Fee Waiver Request involving routine appointments, direct client interactions, and a limited operational footprint.

16. The General Plan Land Use designation of Central Business Mixed -Use, which focuses on shopping, service, and entertainment uses in a pedestrian-oriented urban environment, is suitable for a chiropractic office. This designation encourages commercial uses on the ground floor with residential uses on upper floors. Since a chiropractic office is a service -oriented business, it fits well into the ground floor commercial space in this mixed-use setting.

17. The Proposed Project would be consistent with the following General Plan policies and strategies:

Policy CD-1.6 Preserve, rehabilitate or restore the city’s historic buildings, landmarks, districts and cultural resources
and retain the architectural integrity of established
building patterns within historic residential
neighborhoods to preserve the cultural heritage of the
community.

Policy CD-1.7 Encourage adaptive reuse of and incorporation of the city’s historic buildings and structures for new
development projects, when feasible.

Policy CD-2.1 Recognize, enhance, and preserve, where possible, natural features and ecosystems, and protect cultural
and historic resources.

Action COS-5.g Continue to implement the city’s Historic Preservation Ordinance and periodically review and modify the
Ordinance as necessary in order to ensure that it
continues to meet the city’s historic preservation goals, including creation of a penalty provision to discourage the unlawful alteration or demolition of designated
properties.

Goal LU-4: To promote and assist the restoration and protection of the historic character and elements that embodies the
Downtown and characterizes it as a unique place.

Policy LU-4.1: Downtown Character: Require new development to be sensitive to the unique character that defines
Downtown Campbell.

Strategy LU-4.1a: The historic character of Downtown shall be preserved through the protection and restoration of its historic
buildings and landmarks.

Goal D-4: To retain and reinforce the historic context of the Downtown and build on the established framework that
is characterized by its established historic landmarks

16.a
Packet Pg. 185
Attachment: Draft Resolution (PLN-2024-62 35 S. First Street) City Council Resolution No. Page 4 of 6
PLN-2024-62 ~ 35 S. First St.

Zoning Exception & Conditional Use Permit & Permit Fee Waiver Request Policy D-4.1: Historic Preservation and Redevelopment
Compatibility: The small town character of Downtown
Campbell shall be maintained by encouraging the
preservation of important historic resources, promoting the improvement of existing properties and
businesses, and encouraging new development
compatible in design with existing and newly approved
development.

18. On November 4, 2024, the Historic Preservation Board unanimously recommended City Council approval of the application, recognizing it as a model of adaptive reuse and highlighting incentives and benefits for historic property owners.

19. On November 12, 2024, the Planning Commission unanimously recommended City Council approval of the application, finding the proposed medical use comparable to personal services and complementary to the Downtown area.

20. There is a reasonable relationship and a rough proportionality between the Conditions of Approval (Exhibit A) and the impacts of the project.

21. There is a reasonable relationship between the use of the fees imposed upon the project and the type of development project.

22. No substantial evidence has been presented which shows that the project, as currently presented and subject to the required conditions of approval, will have a significant adverse impact on the environment.

Based upon the foregoing findings of fact, the City Council further finds and concludes that:

Zoning Exception Findings (CMC Sec. 21.33.150.B.2):

1. The zoning exception will facilitate development and use of a historic resource in a manner that is more consistent with its historic character than would be possible under strict compliance with the Zoning Ordinance;

2. The zoning exception will not adversely impact property or public rights-of-way in the surrounding neighborhood or within a historic district;

3. The zoning exception will not negatively impact the integrity or historic characteristics of the historic resource;

4. The zoning exception is the minimum departure from the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance;

5. The zoning exception is in conformance with the General Plan, adopted area plan, and applicable design guidelines; and
Conditional Use Permit Findings (CMC Sec. 21.46.040):

16.a
Packet Pg. 186
Attachment: Draft Resolution (PLN-2024-62 35 S. First Street) City Council Resolution No. Page 5 of 6
PLN-2024-62 ~ 35 S. First St.

Zoning Exception & Conditional Use Permit & Permit Fee Waiver Request

6. The proposed use is allowed within the applicable zoning district with Conditional Use Permit approval, and complies with all other applicable provisions of this Zoning Code and the Campbell Municipal Code;

7. The proposed use is consistent with the General Plan;

8. The proposed site is adequate in terms of size and shape to accommodate the fences and walls, landscaping, parking and loading facilities, yards, and other development features required in order to integrate the use with uses in the surrounding area;

9. The proposed site is adequately served by streets of sufficient capacity to carry the kind and quantity of traffic the use would be expected to generate;

10. The design, location, size, and operating characteristics of the proposed use are compatible with the existing and future land uses on-site and in the vicinity of the subject property; and

11. The establishment, maintenance, or operation of the proposed use at the location proposed will not be detrimental to the comfort, health, morals, peace, safety, or general welfare of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use, or be detrimental or injurious to property and improvements in the neighborhood or to the general welfare of the city.

Permit Fee Waivers (CMC Section 21.46.040):

12. Such waiver would advance the purposes of the Historic Preservation Ordinance and the General Plan.

Environmental Finding(s) (CMC Sec. 21.38.050):

13. This project is Categorically Exempt under Section 15301 (Class 1) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), pertaining to the operation, repair, maintenance, permitting, leasing, licensing, or minor alteration of an existing private structure.

14. No substantial evidence has been presented which shows that the project, as currently presented and subject to the required conditions of approval, will have a significant adverse impact on the environment.

THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approves a Zoning Exception, Conditional Use Permit , and Permit Fee Waiver Request (PLN-2024-62) to allow the operation of a chiropractic and acupuncture office (“Medical Services, Clinics” use) on the ground floor of an existing commercial tenant space (otherwise restricted to an upper floor), within a historic "structure of merit" commonly known as the Grizzle Court Duplex on property located at 35 S. First Street , as well as approving a permit fee waiver request to refund the Historic Zoning Exception Fee , subject to the attached Conditions of Approval (attached Exhibit A).

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 3rd day of December, 2024, by the following roll call vote:

16.a
Packet Pg. 187
Attachment: Draft Resolution (PLN-2024-62 35 S. First Street) City Council Resolution No. Page 6 of 6
PLN-2024-62 ~ 35 S. First St.

Zoning Exception & Conditional Use Permit & Permit Fee Waiver Request

AYES: Councilmembers:

NOES: Councilmembers:

ABSENT: Councilmembers:

ABSTAIN: Councilmembers:

APPROVED:

Susan M. Landry, Mayor

ATTEST:

Andrea Sanders, Secretary

16.a
Packet Pg. 188
Attachment: Draft Resolution (PLN-2024-62 35 S. First Street) Exhibit A

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
PLN-2024-62

Where approval by the Director of Community Development, City Engineer, Public Works Director, City Attorney or Fire Department is required, that review shall be for compliance with all applicable conditions of approval, adopted policies and guidelines, ordinances, laws and regulations and accepted engineering practices for the item under review. Additionally, the applicant is hereby notified that he/she is required to comply with all applicable Codes or Ordinances of the City of Campbell and the State of California that pertain to this development and are not herein specified.

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Planning Division

1. Approved Project : Approval is granted for a Zoning Exception , Conditional Use Permit, and Permit Fee Waiver Request (PLN-2024-62) to allow the operation of a chiropractic and acupuncture office (“Medical Services, Clinics” use) on the ground floor of an existing commercial tenant space (otherwise restricted to an upper floor), within a historic "structure of merit" commonly known as the Grizzle Court Duplex on property located at 35 S. First Street , as well as approving a permit fee waiver request to refund the Historic Zoning Exception Fee.

2. Permit Expiration: The Conditional Use Permit approved herein ("Approval") shall be valid for one (1) year from the effective date of approval. Within this one-year period, a Business License/Zoning Clearance must be issued. Failure to meet this deadline shall result in the Approval being rendered void. Once established, this Approval shall be valid in perpetuity on the Project Site, subject to continued operation of the use.

Discontinuation of the use for a continuous period of twelve months shall void the Approval upon an affirmative determination by the City Council in a public hearing that the use has been discontinued.

3. Operational Standards : Consistent with the submitted Project Plans included as Attachment E of the December 3, 2024, City Council report , and City standards, a “medical services, clinic” pursuant to this Approval shall conform to the following operational standards. Significant deviations from these standards (as determined by the Community Development Director) shall require approval of a Modification to the Conditional Use Permit.
a. Approved Use: The approved use is a “medical services, clinic ,” specifically limited to chiropractic and acupuncture care, and subject to the operational standards listed herein. At no time shall the use be operated as a different form of medical care or as a "medical services, extended care" use. b. Maximum Occupancy : The maximum occupancy shall be subject to the applicable restrictions of the California Building Code (CBC). c. Exam Rooms: The approved medical services, clinic, shall be limited to two exam rooms.

16.a
Packet Pg. 189
Attachment: Draft Resolution (PLN-2024-62 35 S. First Street) Exhibit A – Conditions of Approval ~ 35 S. First St. Page 2 of 4 PLN-2024-62 – Zoning Exception & Conditional Use Permit d. Business License: The business shall be required to obtain and maintain a City business license at all times.
e. Licensed Medical Professionals: All procedures involving medical treatment are required to be performed by licensed medical professionals. f. Hours of Operation: The approved medical services, clinic may operate between the hours of 7:00 A.M. and 9:00 P.M. with business hours between 8:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m., daily
g. Trash Disposal and Clean-Up: Refuse and recycling receptacles shall be kept within the enclosure except during collection in compliance with Chapter

6.04 of the Campbell Municipal Code. All trash disposal, normal clean-up, carpet cleaning, window cleaning, sidewalk sweeping, etc. shall occur during the "business hours."
h. Odor Mitigation : The medical service, clinic use shall be designed and operated in a manner so as to guarantee that no objectionable odors or noises shall be produced outside its walls, and provisions for the off -site disposal of all waste materials shall be made in compliance with County health standards.

The removal of waste material shall be done so as to guarantee that no obnoxious odor is produced.
i. Smoking: "No Smoking" signs shall be posted on the premises in compliance with CMC Section 6.11.060.
j. Loitering: There shall be no loitering allowed outside the business. The business owner is responsible for monitoring the premises to prevent loitering, including contacting the Police Department as necessary to enforce this requirement.
k. Noise: Regardless of decibel level, no noise generated by the approved shall obstruct the free use of neighboring properties so as to unreasonably interfere with the comfortable enjoyment of the neighboring residents. In the event verified complaints are received by the City regarding such noise, the Community Development Director may immediately curtail the Hours of Operation and/or commence revocation proceedings pursuant to Condition of Approval No. 10 (Revocation of Permit). The following restrictions shall also be adhered to limit potential noise impacts:
a. Doors shall remain closed at all times and will not be propped open to contain interior noise.
b. Deliveries shall be restricted to between the hours of 8:00 AM and 8:00 PM.
l. Outdoor Storage: No outdoor storage is permitted on the subject property. No equipment, materials, and/or refuse stored outside the building or within the adjacent parking lot area.
m. Outdoor Display: No outdoor display of merchandise is allowed on the subject property.
n. Lighting: On-site lighting shall be shielded away from adjacent properties and directed on-site. The final design and type of lighting fixtures and lighting

16.a
Packet Pg. 190
Attachment: Draft Resolution (PLN-2024-62 35 S. First Street) Exhibit A – Conditions of Approval ~ 35 S. First St. Page 3 of 4 PLN-2024-62 – Zoning Exception & Conditional Use Permit intensity of any proposed exterior lighting for the project shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Director for compliance with the City of Campbell Lighting Design Standards (CMC Sec. 21.18.090). o. Massage: The scope of practice for chiropractic treatment as set forth in the California Code of Regulations, Title 16, Section 302, includes massage services. Massage services as part of the chiropractic treatment shall be allowed at this establishment only by a licensed chiropractor, or by licensed massage therapists under the “adequate supervision” of a chiropractor as defined in the California Code of Regulations, Title 16, Section 312. Massage therapists shall not operate separately or as independent contractors. p. California Code of Regulation: The allowed chiropractic office shall always comply with all the regulations contained within Title 16 of the California Code of Regulations, Division 4.

4. Property Maintenance: The owner/operator of the subject property shall maintain all exterior areas of the business free from graffiti, trash, rubbish, posters and stickers placed on the property. Exterior areas of the business shall include not only the parking lot and private landscape areas, but also include the public right -of-way adjacent to the business.

5. Landscape Maintenance : All landscaped areas shall be continuously maintained in accordance with City Landscaping Requirements (CMC 21.26). Landscaped areas shall be watered on a regular basis so as to maintain healthy plants. Landscaped areas shall be kept free of weeds, trash, and litter. Dead or unhealthy plants shall be replaced with healthy plants of the same or similar type.

6. Signage: No signage is approved as part of the development application approved herein. New signage shall not be installed prior to approval of a sign permit.

7. Revocation of Permit : Operation of a medical services, clinic use pursuant to this Approval is subject to Chapter 21.46 of the Campbell Municipal Code authorizing the appropriate decision making body to modify or revoke an Conditional Use Permit if it is determined that its operation has become a nuisance to the City’s public health, safety or welfare or for violation of the Conditional Use Permit or any standards, codes, or ordinances of the City of Campbell. At the discretion of the Community Development Director, if the establishment generates three (3) verifiable complaints related to violations of conditions of approval and/or related to its operation within a twelve (12) month period, a public hearing may be scheduled to consider modifying conditions of approval or revoking the Conditional Use Permit. The Community Development Director may commence proceedings for the revocation or modification of permits upon the occurrence of less than three (3) complaints if the Community Development Director determines that the alleged violation warrants such an action.

The Director may also at such time immediately restrict the establishment's hours of operation. In exercising this authority, the decision -making body may consider the following factors, among others:
a. The number and types of Police Department calls for service at or near the establishment that are reasonably determined to be a direct result of customer and/or employee actions;

16.a
Packet Pg. 191
Attachment: Draft Resolution (PLN-2024-62 35 S. First Street) Exhibit A – Conditions of Approval ~ 35 S. First St. Page 4 of 4 PLN-2024-62 – Zoning Exception & Conditional Use Permit b. The number of complaints received from residents, business owners and other citizens concerning the operation of an establishment regarding, noise, and/or other operational impacts; and
c. Violation of conditions of approval.

16.a
Packet Pg. 192
Attachment: Draft Resolution (PLN-2024-62 35 S. First Street) -

HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD
JANUARY 27, 1981
HPL 80-4
35/45 s.

First St.

This is the time and place for a public hearing
to consider the application of Mr. Mark Stevensen
for a landmark designation on property known as
35 and 45 S. First Street.

Mr. Stafford reviewed the application for the Board, stating that no additional infonnation had been received concerning this property.

Mr. Wardell noted that the Civic Improvement Conmission has tabled all referrals from the Historic Preservation Board until the Board meets with them in a study session.

The Board took a recess at 11:15 p.m.; the meetin~ reconvened at 11 :25 p.m.

It was moved by Boardmember Overhouse, and seconded by Boardmember Kern, that the public hearing be closed.

RESOLUTION NO. 4
Discussion
It was moved by Boardmember Kern, and seconded by
Boardmember Overhouse that a landmark designation
be applied to the structures located on property
known as 35 and 45 S. First Street, based on the
following:

1. It exemplifies or reflects special elements of
the City's cultural, social, economic, political,
aesthetic, engineering, or architectural history.

2. It is identified with persons or events significant
in local, state, or national history.

3. It embodies distinctive characteristics of a style,
type, period, or method of construction, or is a
valuable example of the use of indigenous materials
or craftsmanship.

Boardmember Burns felt that these structures were not remnants of the canning industry, as stated in the information provided the Board. He felt it was doubtful that cannery workers ever lived in the houses. He also noted that it was the Christian Science Reading Room at one time.

16.b
Packet Pg. 193
Attachment: Resolution No. 4 (PLN-2024-62 35 S. First Street) -6-
Mr. Stevensen stated that the intention for these structures was as housing for the cannery workers, but then the industry was hit by the depression.

He added that the original property owner did have the contract to label and ship for the cannery.

Boardmember Blaine commented that it was true that the houses were built almost right at the end of Campbell's boom, but it was intended for renting to workers had the depression not hit. He did feel, however, that this was a chance to maintain something of this design in the Campbell area.

The builder was very active in the canning industry, and the family was very active in the everyday work-life of the City.

Chairman Hebard stated that he would like to see this building stay; however, he was unable to find enough available information to warrant its importance as a historic landmark. He added that he would like to see it qualify at some time in the future.

Vote on Motion
AYES: Boardmembers:

NOES: Boardmembers:

ABSENT: Boardmembers:

Blaine, Burns, Kern, Overhouse
Hebard
None
Resolution No. 4 carried with a vote of 4-1; staff was requested to send this item on to the Planning Commission and City Council with a recommenda­ tion of approval for a zone change to Historic.

REQUESTS * * *

16.b
Packet Pg. 194
Attachment: Resolution No. 4 (PLN-2024-62 35 S. First Street) RESOLUTION NO. 4 HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD

CITY OF CAMPBELL, CALIFORNIA
After notification and public hearing as specified by law on the application of the Civic Improvement Cotm1ission for a landmark designation to be applied to the residences located on property known as 35 and 45 S. First Street, referred to as the Grizzle Court Duplex, as per the application filed in the Office of the Planning Department on November 25, 1980, and after presentation by the Planning Staff, proponents and opponents, the hearing was closed (HPL 80-4).

After due consideration of all evidence presented, the Historic Preservation Board did find as follows:

1. It exemplifies or reflects special elements of the City's cultural, social, economic, political, aesthetic, engineering, or architectural history;

2. It is identified with persons or events significant in local, state, or national history.

3. It embodies distinctive characteristics of a style, type, period or method of construction, or is a valuable example of the use of indigenous materials or craftsmanship.

Based on the above findings, the Historic Preservation Board does hereby recommend that the structures located on property known as 35 and 45 S. First Street be designated as a historic landmark.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 27th day of January, 1981, by the following roll call vote:

AYES:

NOES:

Boardmembers: Blaine, Burns, Kem, Overhouse
Boardmembers: Hebard
ABSENT: Boardmembers: None
ATTEST: Philip J. Stafford
Principal Planner
APPROVED: Don Hebard __,c..~---------
C ha 1 rm an

16.b
Packet Pg. 195
Attachment: Resolution No. 4 (PLN-2024-62 35 S. First Street) ( _B_K_ ')'
~
,-
' l)
-
..J
..J
"" m
CL
~
c( •o'
0 I
"' I
'~
~
t:
&
'
y
.!!0
IO
U 1~H
'Z t! ., :
• ~ ...... ,
f1
--o ,::
d~
CAMPlllLS
,'ll)
u
110
' ·,•··
.-:i~ I
o,,.

ClfY
·o,
AVE .
•t· f'" j • >- ..
t- l
- C O u
f I
B.
_, a
0::
c( ~. :
'r!~ ~ o ., II-..:.,.. /~•· :c
0 0::
0 • ' .
- • ~-
> J d • ,i°"''••, 5 ~ I t
·s•
',OUlWW{~llRII A~llON s. l FIRST
JO i
.. : .. i 1111
'41 :;;,; ,_
C
I§ : ,§ I ► ,~
I
41 :g
~-.
., . .. .. ~ .. .. , ..
c> .,> <. • ·,
4c "-...
"'~,. ,,
--..~
•';.~
I.)
c:-,,..,
c., o,.
'(
.§.I.
•
~-l
/
I t~. l t,·l~~ { t1)
:11.,u.1t I • - '"'"
z
~'..;-
;;--- ·-•./~o-. '4(-_
1 •
/4
~
,•1·-~'. I 23 Ac,
I ..... • .. ~ M
" , , ~ ··~·-:-r-r ·.--......,, p ,: ,,. / , ' t 5 t 4 t 3 ,' 2 ,' l r,• • V ~ / / • I ' o:::t
I
0 ex:>
_.

0..
:c
0 Go
u
rl
~
• ''°"'
~ ___ .!!._
C l'IOll5 •
~
,,0 15
llj L_;._
31 . ~ ..
>
..
~
,
c:,'~
,--.+-=; • - I-II ; IO ~9 I-ISi
.. _. , - w
{ ,:,: ~•Ya; 9•~ ~
>
I l I
lo.I
.fg
411
2 £, Kl
'
,y I ,' l I~ '" ,: '• J- t-
i ~ I I~ ~ i.· ~ , .. I 1' t!." 1 /, l ,- I ,_ 4 If' •
I I I I I-,• / , I , , t
0 ' , , , ' I • "'· '!':=., ·-• ~ ' •• ' .!L..t__u_,J 1719 I; - -· --·· - w 0 .. ,.,
SI J§
31 I 36 , - -.,
t., :t If
,;
I
--~ _:eJ
~ 3, U : ll; 1~ IR 1
l!!. _l! II!
§ Bl
0 I! ~ ~
... . ., ... . ...
5'
So
1! 1~1111
...,,.
• " 24
~ 14 ~
...
s. ~EC.ONO CHAPllll"> ~1MWlmRN Abbll •z Sl J II CAMPBCll~ Abbll ,. §§ IS 11 25 ~
~ ·'•
18 .., .. ,. ... ..,
19 'al IHO•
I :J. §l
2{, H
16 @v
I
...J
w /§ 11 ~
ll :r ,
1 -1 ~
a •· 3:1 • 25 'i 20
I -
g§ jr ll ~
I .. f',
'('.
~ §§
21 5§
11 26 ¥ ...J
i..,
<ti
n..
,i, 16 12 I II
I
IO
I ~
·r·
~
< u
:, !§ 2'l
I
2'J 10 I 31
I
,, w
.,. CITY 24
CAMPBELL .,
,. Zl
"' ..
~ ' 6
I
l
il !? ~: - I
,. I
' • I 1 1
" "
I "' " l ~l
'~-,____ y. ,..... s.
·7+1-7
, I
THIRD SIROM !,Ulll)IVISION
I 2~ ' 23 22
I I
' ... l
I 1
32 I 33 : I
1 ' '/2 I
81 2 ii" 11$ ·,- I-
I
I ?! l
!____H_ ' ___!-__.!! 1 -
@
21 4
.1
1 , ..
14_!!
., :z: ••
0 u
,., ~ ,,. a:
:.1 ui 1·~
I:( ~
CURHS SU~ll\lllSION
§§
~-
~
~
, ..
fl
11116
18 28 I I 29 ~
21 ~ll
¥1
9,0 I ..
16~ §! ~ @
•,:
!>l
·1 r - --------1 ,-----
.. •
'
j,
f
·;
• ·-1
.....
~
"' o<
g_
:::; I § .,.
~
~ X
i..,
~ _.,
,c:
-·~·~--
@
f. I f1j •'61
r:-;;11s"""it1,~
CQfllPIL(D IN co11,o•M•NCI WITN SIC .. ,
Of fk( lt(YltlUI AND U.a,UIOII COOi
ffHCTIV( OAfl 11a•CMl,1t1t
ALI RED E CARLSON ·&SSE SSOII
in .....
r
I

16.b
Packet Pg. 196
Attachment: Resolution No. 4 (PLN-2024-62 35 S. First Street) ITEM NO. 2
STAFF COMMENT SHEET - HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD MEETING OF JANUARY 27, 1981 HPL 80-04
35 & 45 S.

First St.

RECOMMENDATION
Public hearing to consider the application of
Mark W. and Edna M. Stevensen to have 35 & 45
S. First Street considered for historic
landmark designation.

1. That the Board review the historic significance of this structure to determine if designation as a historic landmark is warranted; and

2. If designated, then the recommendation should be forwarded to the Planning Commission to initiate a zone chan9e of said property.

DISCUSSION
This item was continued from the meeting of December 23, 1980 in order that additional information could be gathered to support the applicant's request for historic landmark designation. The previous Staff Comment Sheet is attached for the Board's review.

16.b
Packet Pg. 197
Attachment: Resolution No. 4 (PLN-2024-62 35 S. First Street) ITEM NO. 2
STAFF COMMENT SHEET - HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD MEETING OF DECEMBER 2 3, 1980 HPL 80-04
35 & 45 s. First St.

RECOMMENDATION
Request of Mr. Mark Stevensen for determination of
historic significance of property known as 35 & 45
S. First Street.

1. That the Board review the historic significance of this structure to determine if designation as a historic land~ is warranted; and

2. If designated, then the recommendation should be forwarded to the Planning Commission to initiate a zone change of said property.

DISCUSSION
At its previous meeting of November 25, 1980 the Historic Preservation Board requested that this item be set for a public hearing.

The request of Mr. Mark Stevensen and a description of the structure is attached for the Board's review. Additionally, Staff has included a copy of the Historic Resources Inventory Sheet for the Board's consideration.

At this time it would seem appropriate for the Board to make a recommendation if this structure warrants the historic landmark designation, then Staff would recommend the Board forward its recommendation to the Planning Commission to consider a zone change.

16.b
Packet Pg. 198
Attachment: Resolution No. 4 (PLN-2024-62 35 S. First Street)

CITY OF CAMPBELL, CALIFORNIA

REQUEST TO HAVE THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD SET PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER DESIGNATION OF AN HISTORIC LANDMARK

1. APPLICANT:

2. PROPERTY:

3. PROPERTY OWNER:
(If not applicant)

4. LEGAL DESCRIPTION:

5. MAP:

6. DESCRIPTION:

7. FEE:

CERTIFICATE OF APPLICANT:
et a I.

NAME MARK \·/ • & E D N A M • STE V E N S EN_ DATE t Jo v • 2 5 , I 9 8 0 ADDRESS 4 5 S • F i rs t S t re et
Campbel I, CA. 95008 TEL}408> 866-6143

THE GRIZZLE COURT-DUPLEX
ADDRESS 35 & 45 S. First Street, Campbell, CA. 95008
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 4 I 3- 6- 7 7 __ ....;;..._ _________ _ NAME MARK W. & ED t J A M • STE V Et JS E tJ et • a I I ADORE~~ , 5 <1 ~ e Rt o r ~ e •
San Jose, CA. 9511 I TEL.(408) 629-5090
Applicant must file a current legal description of the
proposed landmark's location.

Applicant must submit a location map of the property
proposed for landmark designation.

A. Applicant must submit information at the time of filing, describing the proposed landmark's special aesthetic,
cultural, architectural, or engineering interest or
value of an historic nature.

B. Applicant must submit sketches, drawings, photographs, or other descriptive materials which will aid the
Historic Preservation Board in determining the proposed landmarks historic value.

None
I/He the undersigned have some direct or indirect interest in the property described above, and in the proposed historic landmark. It is understood that such a request fs made without the necessity that the Historic Preservation Board grant the request. The information contained herein is true and corre to my (our) best knowledge and belief.

DATE:

Signature(s) of Property Owner(s)
(Persons Making the Request)

16.b
Packet Pg. 199
Attachment: Resolution No. 4 (PLN-2024-62 35 S. First Street) State of California - The Rnourca ~cy
• 'DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND REr TION
l Se·
l.lTM-----
1 Site _____ Mo. _ Yr.
- 0 ----...1MR - SHL_
HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY ! Lat _____ Lon _____ era_ s;g_ !!! Adm_ T2 _T3_ Cat_HABS_HAER_Fect_
IOENTI Fl CATION

1. Common name: __________________ P_e~r~m~l ~s..;;s~•~o_n ____ t-o_P_h_o __ n..;;.e..;.: ____ ====---

2. Historic name, if known:_--:6-crs=::'1'-tr--------------------------

3. Street or rural address_~!!:=~~~-~S~-~HJ~~!ff'L~$~VuRf..!l="[.!E~1:(_ __________ _ City: --C--A .. M._,f...;8;;..E..,;L_L _______ _ ZIP: 1Soo8 County: SANTA CLARA

4. Presentowner,ifknown: ______________ ...,.:Address: _____________ _ City: ________________ ZIP: _____ Ownership is: Public □ Private ~

5. Present Use: __ Sn:4f __ ......_.._.fhr4=--.,.__....__-____ Original Use: SJ ~ Other past uses: _________________________________ _

DESCRIPTION

6. Briefly describe the present physical appearance of 1he site or structure and describe any major alterations from its original condition: ~~~~-4:fj /?Yi:,~(~:J~-
~~ /Jla cA~f ~ - ~'f~~-

7. Locational sketch map ( aw nd label site and
surrounding streets, roads an prominent landmarks): •
N
______ i::_-_. __ c,-,,..ps ~LL __ A_vl--'--1------J... --·····---,
City f>R.
~,,R 523 (Rev. 7/7-5-) -----l r

8. Approximate property size:

Lot size (in feet) Frontage ___ _
Depth, _____ ';
or approx. acreage __ _

9. Condition: (check one)
a. Excellent D b. Good D c. Fair D -
d. Deteriorated ~ e. No longer in existence D

10. Is the feature a. Altered? D b. Unaltered? ~

11. Surroundings: (Check more than one if necessary)
a. Open land D b. Scattered buildings D
c. Densely built-up D d. Residential D
e. Commercial ~ f. Industrial D
g. O1her gJ td;; R-

12. Threats to site:
a. None known D b. Private development ~
c. Zoning ~ d. Public Worts project ~
e. v~;i-';,,SJ,~❖~~p

13. Date(s) bi encldtiapfiotograph(s): FRAME 6 • z-i-'f-/ O

16.b
Packet Pg. 200
Attachment: Resolution No. 4 (PLN-2024-62 35 S. First Street)

GRIZZLE COURT DUPLEX
November 2 5, I 980
The smal I court duplex at 35-45 South First Street
was I iving quarters for Campbel I cannery workers. It Is one of the few remnants of the fruit processing industry that dominated Campbel I's economy from the 1880's to 1950's.

The court duplex was bui It in 1927 as a rental by its
owner, Claude Grizzle, with the help of local carpenter Tony Bargas, a neighbor who had bui It his own house across the street from the Grizzles at 146 Al ice Avenue in 1924. Claude and Jeanette Grizzle married in 1925 and purchased their house at 99 Alice Avenue that year.

Claude Grizzle was a long-time resident of Campbel I,
first visiting here in 1902 with his family. His brother Fred worked in the cannery and brother Orie was the local barber. His sister Winnie G. Grizzle was telephone operator and owned the 191 I S.G. Rodeck House (Campbel I Memorial Chapel in 1980) at 231 E. Campbel I Avenue, on the corner of N. Second Street, which she purchased In 1934 as a home for her parents and brother, Fred. Claude later became a plumber but in the 1920's he contracted to !able and ship the cans from the George E. Hyde Co. cannery. After 1929 this became Sunsweet Plant No. I and today Is The Factory in Campbell.

The court design with arch connecting the two rectangular units over a driveway was a common feature, especially in southern California, in the 1920 1 s. The simple basic design, unique to Campbel I in 1980, was most I ikely made by the owner with suggestions from the carpenter and neighbor, Tony Bargas.

Claude's widow, Jeanette, believes the plans were in a bureau drawer in her house for many years.

The stucco exterior, related to the California Mission or Spanish Revival Style of that era, is common, as are the wooden frame windows and doors and the wooden overhang of the two front doors. But the detai Is of workmanship and materials are uncommon when compared with 1980 bui I ding practices. The front doors are glass panes separated by wood. The stucco is al I the way around-­ not just the front facade as was common even in the 1920's.

The original front porch I ights have become collector's items bacause of their covers, although they were common in 1927-- 53 years ago.

But the most unique construction feature is the roof, which slants from the exterior stucco wal Is toward the center of the bui I ding and funnels rain water through a scupper on the side wal I of each unit into a metal "cup" from which a downspout carries the water to the ground. At its lowest point where the Cont on Page 2

16.b
Packet Pg. 201
Attachment: Resolution No. 4 (PLN-2024-62 35 S. First Street) Grizzle Court Duplex, cont.
35-45 s. First St.

Camp be I I, CA. 95008

Nov. 2 5, I 98 0
scupper Is, the roof surface Is about four feet lower than the surrounding exterior wal Is. In the center of each roof, but not visible from the ground, is a brick chimney to vent the stove and gas appl lances, even though there Is no fireplace.

Highly visible from the ground are the metal air vents on the four upper side wall corners of both units, taken from the heating system of a house. These can be left open In the summer to help cool the attics.

The interior of each unit features very smal I front room, a smal I kitchen wel I I ighted by windows, and a rear bedroom and bathroom. A smal I rear porch has been added to the 35 S. First Street unit, with windows al I around the porch. The interior has redwood wainscotting and the narrow front room closets with double doors were originally for hide-away beds.

The lack of size reflects the purpose of these units as $15 per month rentals for workers in the nearby fruit processing plants. Claude Grizzle did add two more smal I rental behind the duplex and intended to buy land and add more. One unit was the smal I wooden office of the Campbel I Water Company, also owned by his boss, Ralph Hyde, which he moved here after the water company abandoned it.

The Grizzle Court Duplex has unique architectural features in design and detail that are representative of the 1920's but rare in the l980's, and it was built by its owner and a carpenter who were from wel I known Campbel I fami I ies. But its greatest significance is from its purpose and use. It was a rental for two generations of workers who lived here while working in Campbel I plants. The seasonal workers and the fruit processing industry are gone but this smal I court-duplex remains to tel I a part of their story to future generations in Campbel I.

16.b
Packet Pg. 202
Attachment: Resolution No. 4 (PLN-2024-62 35 S. First Street) -·----· --------
-~- +
_;f ~;r:1 .
~ ,
. , '
f • =~:_:~,.>:~~L,. ~::~ii::t-~ t'° . .,.,......_r, ..
- ,
- ._.,,.._., ... _ .. ~--: .. ,

16.b
Packet Pg. 203
Attachment: Resolution No. 4 (PLN-2024-62 35 S. First Street) NOTICE

NOTICE IS -HEREBY GIVEN THAT A NEGATIVE DECLARATION HAS BEEN PREPARED FOR the application of Mark W. and Edna M. Stevensen, et al, to have 35 and 45 s. First Street considered for Historic Landmark designation (HPL 80-4).

THIS PROJECT WILL BE CONSIDERED FOR APPROVAL BY THE CITY OF CAMPBELL ON December 23, 1980

INTERESTED PERSONS HAY REVIEW A COPY OF SAID NEGATIVE DECLARATION

ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE
---------

PLANNING DEPARTMENT, CAMPBELL
CITY HALL, 75 NORTH CENTRAL AVENUE, CAMPBELL, CALIFORNIA.

PUBLISH ONE TIME: December 11, 1980

16.b
Packet Pg. 204
Attachment: Resolution No. 4 (PLN-2024-62 35 S. First Street)

PROOF OF PUBLICATION
< 2015.5 C.C.P. >

STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
County of Santa Clara
m
I am a citizen of the United Statel and a resident
of the County aforesaid; I am over the a1e of
eighteen yean, and not a party to or Interested
in the above-entitled matter. I am the principal
clerk of the printer of the

CAMPBELL PRESS
10950 No. Blaney Avenue, CUpertlN, Callfonla,
a newspaper of 1eneral clrealatlN, printed aad
published every Tbanday In the city of CUper­
tlno, Couty of Santa aara; aad which newt­
paper has been adJadled a nenpaper of 1en­
eral circulation by the llllperlor Collrt of the
Couty of Santa aara, State of California. Case
Number 84841; that the notice of which the an­
nexed Is a printed copy <set In type not smaller
than non-parell>, ha1 been pab81hed In each
regular and entire l11ae of ,aid nenpaper and
not In any supplement thereof on the followln1
dates, to wit:

Dec. 10,
all in the year 19~
I certify <or declare> under penalty of perjury
that the foregoing is true and correct.

Dated at CUpertlno, California, this
10th day of Dec. 8a -----------, 19 ---
~~:.:,
1'111■ space •-M the County Clerk' ■
Fllln1 Stamp

PROOF OF PUBLICATION OF

NE'JA'T'IVE DECLARATION

16.b
Packet Pg. 205
Attachment: Resolution No. 4 (PLN-2024-62 35 S. First Street)

PROOF OF PUBLICATION
<ZOIS.5 C.C.P.)

STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
County of Santa Clara
I am a citizen of the United States and a rNldent
of the County afore■ald; I am over the a1e of
eighteen yean, and not a party to or lntere■ ted
in the above-entitled matter. I am the principal
clerk of the printer of the

CAMPBELL PRESS
IOISO No. Blaney Avenue, CUpertlno, CaUlonla,
a new1paper of 1eneral clrcalatlN, printed and
pabll1hed every Thanday In the elty of Cllper­
tino, County of Santa aara; ud wllleh new■-
paper ha■ been adJadled a nenpaper of 1en­
eral elreulatlon by the 811perlor Court of the
County of Santa aara, State of Calllonla. ca■e
Number MNI; that the notice of whleh the an­
nexed 11 a printed eopy ( ■et In type not 1maUer
than non-parell >. ha■ been pub81hed In eaeh
regular and entire l11ae of ■aid new■ paper and
not in any 1applement thereof on the followl■I
dates, to wit:

Dec. 10,
all in the year 19 80
I certify <or declare) under penalty of perjury
that the foregoing ls true and correct.

Dated at capertlno, California, thl1
10th day of Dec. , 19 _...8.-o __
~~$~~ Sign
Thi■ ■pace •- ,or the County Clerk's
Fllln1 Stamp
AD# 585-CP

PROOF OF PUBLICATION OF

16.b
Packet Pg. 206
Attachment: Resolution No. 4 (PLN-2024-62 35 S. First Street)

CITY OF CAMPBELL
75 NORTH CENTRAL

CA M P B E L L, C A L I F O R N I A
(408) 378-8141
Department: PLANNING
AVENUE
95008
NOTICE
December 3, 1980
0 F HEARING
Notice is hereby given that the Historic Preservation Board of the City of Campbell has set the hour of 9:30 a.m. on Tuesday, December 23, 1980 in the City Hall Council Chambers, 75 North Central Avenue, Campbell as the time and place to consider the application of Mark W. and Edna M. Stevensen, et al, to have 35 and 45 S. First Street considered for Historic Landmark designation (HPL 80-4).

Map and legal description of subject properties are on file in the office of the Planning Department, 75 North Central Avenue, Campbell, California.

Interested persons may appear and be heard at said hearing.

CITY OF CAMPBELL

PLANNING DEPARTMENT
ARTHUR A. KBE

PLANNING DIRECTOR

16.b
Packet Pg. 207
Attachment: Resolution No. 4 (PLN-2024-62 35 S. First Street)

HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD
NOVEMBER 25, 1980
Item No. 2 concerning 147 N. Central Avenue was postponed until later in the meeting at the request of the propPrty owner.

MISCELLANEOUS * * *
35 & 35 S. First St.

Grizzle Court Duplex
Mr. King presented the application of Mark W. and Edna M. Stevensen to have 35 and 45 S. First Street considered for Historic Landmark designation, known as the Grizzle Court Duplex.

It was moved by Ms. 0verhouse, and seconded by Mrs. Kern that a public hearing be set for December 23, 1980 (HPL 80-4). Motion carried unanimously. * * *

16.b
Packet Pg. 208
Attachment: Resolution No. 4 (PLN-2024-62 35 S. First Street) HPL 80-4

CITY OF CAMPBELL, CALIFORNIA

REQUEST TO HAVE THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD SET PUBLIC

HEARING TO CONSIDER DESIGNATION OF AN HISTORIC LANDMARK

1. APPLICANT:

2. PROPERTY:

3. PROPERTY OWNER:
(If not applicant)

4. LEGAL DESCRIPTION:

5. MAP:

6. DESCRIPTION:

7. FEE:

CERTIFICATE OF APPLICANT:
et al.

NAME MARK W . & EDNA M . STEVENS EN DATE Nov . 2 5 , I 9 8 0 ADDRESS 4 5 S . F i rs t St re et
Campbel I, CA. 95008 TEL}408) 866-6143

THE GRIZZLE COURT-DUPLEX
ADDRESS 35 & 45 S. First Street, Campbel I, CA. 95008
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 413-6-77
NAME MA R K W . & E DNA M . STE V E N S EN et . a I I
ADORE~.::, I 54 aontor Rs.

San Jose, CA. 95111 TEL.(408) 629-5090
Applicant must file a current legal description of the
proposed landmark's location.

Applicant must submit a location map of the property
proposed for landmark designation.

A. Applicant must submit infonnation at the time of filing, describing the proposed landmark's special aesthetic,
cultural, architectural, or engineering interest or
value of an historic nature.

B. Applicant must submit sketches, drawings, photographs, or other descriptive materials which will aid the
Historic Preservation Board in detennining the proposed landmarks historic value.

None
I/He the undersigned have some direct or indirect interest in the property described above, and in the proposed historic landmark. It is understood that such a request is made without the necessity that the Historic Preservation Board grant the request. The infonnation contained herein is true and corre to my (our) best knowledge and belief.

DATE:

Signature(s) of Property Owner(s)
(Persons Making the Request)

16.b
Packet Pg. 209
Attachment: Resolution No. 4 (PLN-2024-62 35 S. First Street)

DPR 523A (1/95) *Required information

P1. Other Identifier: Campbell Historic Resource
*P2. Location:  Not for Publication  Unrestricted *a. County Santa Clara and (P2c, P2e, and P2b or P2d. Attach a Location Map as necessary.)
*b. USGS 7.5' Quad Date T; R ; ¼ of ¼ of Sec ; B.M.
c. Address 35-45 S. First St. City Campbell Zip 95008 d. UTM: (Give more than one for large and/or linear resources) Zone , mE/ mN e. Other Locational Data: (e.g., parcel #, directions to resource, elevation, etc., as appropriate) APN: 412-06-036

*P3a. Description: (Describe resource and its major elements. Include design, materials, condition, alterations, size, setting, and boundaries)

A Spanish Colonial Revival duplex currently housing commercial uses, this structure was remodeled after a 1997 fire. It is one story in height and is characterized by two simple square shapes connected by an archway at the street frontage. Of wood construction covered with smooth stucco, the walls rise to parapeted flat roofs.

Small, cantilevered, tile-covered shed roofs are located over the two entries over concrete stoops. The windows and doors have been largely retrofitted with newer components; some multi-pane sash remain, framed in stucco mold. Later additions are located at the rear. Located within a commercial area, the minimally- sized lot has been embellished with palm trees and river rock at the frontage.

*P3b. Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) 1-3 story Commercial Building *P4. Resources Present:  Building Structure Object Site District Element of District Other (Isolates, etc.)

P5b. Description of Photo: (view,
date, accession #) Front
Façade, 07/17/07

*P6. Date Constructed/Age and
Source:
 Historic  Prehistoric 
Both
c. 1925-35_________________
*P7. Owner and Address:

Mark & Edna Stevenson
154 Senter Road
San Jose, CA 95111

*P8. Recorded by: (Name,
affiliation, and address)
Leslie A. G. Dill Architect
110 N. Santa Cruz Ave.

Los Gatos, CA 95030

*P9. Date Recorded: 4/1999
*P10. Survey Type: (Describe)

*P11. Report Citation: (Cite
survey report and other
sources, or enter "none.")
Survey 1977-78. Initial notes
taken by Tom M. King
(October 21, 1977).

*Attachments: NONE
Location Map Continuation Sheet  Building, Structure, and Object Record Archaeological Record District Record Linear Feature Record Milling Station Record Rock Art Record Artifact Record Photograph Record  Other (List):

State of California — The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI #
PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial
NRHP Status Code
Other Listings
Review Code Reviewer Date
P5a. Photograph or Drawing (Photograph required for
buildings, structures, and objects.)

16.c
Packet Pg. 210
Attachment: DPR Form (PLN-2024-62 35 S. First Street)

DPR 523A (1/95) *Required information

*NRHP Status Code

B1. Historic Name: Grizzle Court Duplex
B2. Common Name: Grizzle Court Duplex

B3. Original Use: B4. Present Use:
*B5. Architectural Style:
*B6. Construction History: (Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations)

Estimated to be built, 1925-35.

*B7. Moved?  No Yes Unknown Date: Original Location:
*B8. Related Features:

B9a. Architect: Unknown b. Builder: Unknown
*B10. Significance: Theme Architecture, Exploration/Settlement Area

Period of Significance Property Type Applicable Criteria (Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period, and geographic scope. Also address integrity.)

Typical small apartments. This was the site of Judge Blaine’s home where Frank Blaine was born. Jack Burns lived in the same house in 1911 at time of flood.

B11. Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes)

*B12. References:

B13. Remarks:

*B14. Evaluator: See P8
*Date of Evaluation: See P9
State of California — The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#

BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
(This space reserved for official comments.)

16.c
Packet Pg. 211
Attachment: DPR Form (PLN-2024-62 35 S. First Street)

16.d
Packet Pg. 212
Attachment: Resolution No. 3606 (PLN-2024-62 35 S. First Street)

16.d
Packet Pg. 213
Attachment: Resolution No. 3606 (PLN-2024-62 35 S. First Street)

16.d
Packet Pg. 214
Attachment: Resolution No. 3606 (PLN-2024-62 35 S. First Street)

16.d
Packet Pg. 215
Attachment: Resolution No. 3606 (PLN-2024-62 35 S. First Street)

16.d
Packet Pg. 216
Attachment: Resolution No. 3606 (PLN-2024-62 35 S. First Street)

16.d
Packet Pg. 217
Attachment: Resolution No. 3606 (PLN-2024-62 35 S. First Street)

16.d
Packet Pg. 218
Attachment: Resolution No. 3606 (PLN-2024-62 35 S. First Street)

16.d
Packet Pg. 219
Attachment: Resolution No. 3606 (PLN-2024-62 35 S. First Street)

16.d
Packet Pg. 220
Attachment: Resolution No. 3606 (PLN-2024-62 35 S. First Street)

16.d
Packet Pg. 221
Attachment: Resolution No. 3606 (PLN-2024-62 35 S. First Street)

16.d
Packet Pg. 222
Attachment: Resolution No. 3606 (PLN-2024-62 35 S. First Street)

16.d
Packet Pg. 223
Attachment: Resolution No. 3606 (PLN-2024-62 35 S. First Street)

16.d
Packet Pg. 224
Attachment: Resolution No. 3606 (PLN-2024-62 35 S. First Street)

16.d
Packet Pg. 225
Attachment: Resolution No. 3606 (PLN-2024-62 35 S. First Street)

16.d
Packet Pg. 226
Attachment: Resolution No. 3606 (PLN-2024-62 35 S. First Street)

16.d
Packet Pg. 227
Attachment: Resolution No. 3606 (PLN-2024-62 35 S. First Street) Coversheet Project Site Address: 35 S. 1st Street, Campbell 95008-2909 - Grizzle Court Duplex APN: 412-06-036 01 Zoning District: CB-MU Project Title: Conditional Use Permit Modification, Historic Zoning Exception Scope of Work: Modify previous commercial service use and provide variance to allow medical services on 1st floor of historical building. Current city plan requires medical services to be on the 2nd floor. Sheet Index: 1. Coversheet; 2. Site Photography; 3-7. Site Plan with Floor Plan, Furniture and Accesibility, Project Description; 8. Preliminary Title Report Project Data Table: Net Lot Size: 1200 SF subject unit; Gross 2400 SF for duplex property; Floor Area Ratio 50%; Building SF: 600; Parking: No onsite parking, see adjacent city parking lot. Fire Prevention: Smoke and heat detectors that are monitored 24/7 by the ADT commercial monitoring service. Fire extinguishers have appropriate signage and are inspected annually. Reserved Area for City date and Approval Stamps:

16.e
Packet Pg. 228
Attachment: Project Plans (PLN-2024-62 35 S. First Street)

16.e
Packet Pg. 229
Attachment: Project Plans (PLN-2024-62 35 S. First Street)

16.e
Packet Pg. 230
Attachment: Project Plans (PLN-2024-62 35 S. First Street)

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

Owner is requesting Conditional Use Permit Modification for Historic Zoning Exception for premises of tenant. Variance needed to allow for the establishment of a medical service within an existing commercial tenant space on property located at 35 S. 1st Street, an Historical single story building.

Medical services to include acupuncture, chiropractic, and orthopedic physical therapy. No modification to exterior or interior of building.

DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES

The premises are located on a connecting street to the downtown restaurant and shopping area in an Historical Preservation area.

OPERATIONS

Medical services will have hours of operation that meet our tenant’s clients’ needs and will not have any impact on other businesses in the immediate area.

Hours of Operation: 9AM TO 7PM, Monday through Sunday
Maximum Employees: 2 during hours of operation
Maximum Customers: 2 per appointment hours
Required Parking: 3 spaces (1:200 sq. ft.) (same as prior use) Public Parking Provided: 20 spaces (shared)

PROJECT GOALS

Tenant’s will expand access to long term services to promote health and wellness to the Campbell and surrounding communities.

PUBLIC BENEFITS

Tenant plans to provide the community with an accessible medical service for health and wellness for muscle injury and cancer treatment chemotherapy in one of Campbell’s primary business districts and maintain a strong bond with the community through local ownership, employment and engagement in the Campbell area.

Clients will be welcomed into a comfortable and relaxing environment by the Naturopathic support staff tenant.

Tenant is proud to be a female-founded & operated business, giving the Campbell and surrounding communities an easy and convenient way to enjoy the many benefits of natural healing and services.

CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE

Owner and Tenant do not have any construction plans as property has already been set up with the functionality needed. The previous tenant, La Spa Bella Derma, operated a health spa at this location and had completed Campbell City-approved tenant improvements. We plan to operate this business in the premises in it’s as-is condition.

16.e
Packet Pg. 231
Attachment: Project Plans (PLN-2024-62 35 S. First Street)

City
Council
Report

TITLE: Amending Classification & Salary Schedule to Add Economic Development Manager (Resolution/Roll Call Vote)

RECOMMENDED ACTION

That the City Council adopt a resolution amending the City of Campbell Classification and Salary Schedule to add a new job classification and pay range for Economic Development Manager.

BACKGROUND

Section 2.12.030 of the Campbell Municipal Code requires the City Manager to prepare and submit to the City Council recommendations for the reorganization of offices, departments, and positions which are considered to be in the best interest of efficient, effective and economical conduct of the municipal services provided by the City of Campbell (City). Section 2.16.020 of the Campbell Municipal Code further provides that the City Council may, from time to time, change the compensation of employees of said City, and may, by resolution, adopt salary and wage scales.

In addition, Government Code Sections 20636 and 7522.34 and California Code of Regulations Sections 570.5 and 571.1 require that the City’s pay rates be reported pursuant to a publicly available pay schedule that has been duly approved and adopted by the employer, in accordance with applicable public meeting laws.

On April 2, 2024, the City Council adopted a new Economic Development Plan for the City. The 2024 Economic Development Plan contains five Strategic Initiatives, and 18 Actions; all intended to create a vibrant, resilient and diversified economy in Campbell, fostering business growth, creating local jobs, and increasing tax revenue.

Subsequently, the City Council adopted the City’s Fiscal Year (FY) 2024 -2025 Budget which included funding an Economic Development Manager position. This position was critical as it would oversee implementation of the 2024 Economic Development Plan and manage economic development programs within the City. More specifically, this position would be focused on managing business attraction, business retention and expansion, and business marketing and communications in the City. Adding the position as part of the budget was also intended to support the City Council Priority for Financial Stability and Long-Term Land Use Planning and Housing.

Item: 17
Category: NEW BUSINESS
Meeting Date: December 3, 2024
17 Packet Pg. 232
Amending Classification & Salary Schedule to Add Economic Development Manager Page 2 of 4 In furtherance of the City’s FY 2024 -2025 Budget, and as provided for in Section 3.0 (Classification Plan) of the City’s Personnel Rules and Regulations, staff has drafted a proposed job classification and salary range for the Economic Development Manager classification and, with this report, is seeking the City Council’s consideration and approval of the same. If approved, the position will replace the Economic Development Specialist position that has been vacant since 2022.

DISCUSSION

In creating a job classification and salary range for the Economic Development Manager classification, staff first took into consideration Section 4.3 of the City’s Personnel Rules and Regulations providing that, “effective operation of local government requires the attraction and retention of qualified management personnel” and the establishment of “…a compensation plan which is competitive with comparable management positions in cities of comparable size and operations.” With these goals in mind, staff worked with its Economic Development Consultant, Good City, to draft a job specification that focused on the skills needed to specifically and successfully manage the Economic Development programs provided for in the Economic Development Plan. Exhibit A to this report contains the proposed job specification for the Economic Development Manager classification.

Once the drafting of the proposed job specification was complete, staff worked with Bryce Consulting to conduct a salary survey of comparable cities with the same job classification. Those cities included: Cupertino, Gilroy, Los Gatos, Mountain View, and Sunnyvale. Milpitas, Morgan Hill, Palo Alto, Santa Clara, and Saratoga did not have comparable positions.

Based on the City’s Personnel Rules and Regulations, as well as the salary survey, staff recommends adding the Economic Development Manager job classification, as set forth in Exhibit A, at a Classified Management level with the salary range set forth in the table below:

JOB TITLE STEP RANGES
Range Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5
Economic
Development
Manager
Hourly

$78.13

$82.03

$86.13

$90.44

$94.96
Bi-
Weekly

$6,250

$6,563

$6,891

$7,235

$7,597
Monthly
$13,542

$14,219

$14,930

$15,676

$16,460

Annual

$162,500

$170,625 $179,156

$188,114

$197,520

17 Packet Pg. 233
Amending Classification & Salary Schedule to Add Economic Development Manager Page 3 of 4 Should Council approve the job classification and the salary range as recommended, staff will include both in the proposed updated Classification and Salary Schedule which is coming before the Council for consideration and approval in a related Council item on December 3, 2024. If that item is approved, staff will proceed with its recruitment efforts to fill this critical position.

FISCAL IMPACT
The 1.0 FTE Economic Development Manager position will be covered by funds identified in the adopted FY 2024-2025 Budget. The total compensation for the position was budgeted at $203,477; assuming an anticipated start date of October 1, 2024. With a start date likely closer to February 1, 2025, the fiscal impact in FY 2025 will be reduced by approximately $91,000 to $112,477 and result in budgetary savings in FY 2025. The budgetary savings will partially be offset by professional services used to backfill the vacant position.

ALTERNATIVES

1. Do not approve the proposed job classification or salary range for an Economic Development Manager.

2. Provide other direction to staff.

Prepared by:

Angelique Gaeta, Assistant City Manager
Approved by:

Brian Loventhal, City Manager
17 Packet Pg. 234
Amending Classification & Salary Schedule to Add Economic Development Manager Page 4 of 4 Attachment:
a. Resolution - Economic Development Manager Spec
b. Job Specs - Economic Development Manager
17 Packet Pg. 235
RESOLUTION NO. __________

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CAMPBELL

AMENDING THE CLASSIFICATION AND SALARY SCHEDULE TO ADD THE

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MANAGER CLASSIFICATION

WHEREAS, The City Manager is required by Section 2.12.030 of the Campbell Municipal Code to prepare and submit to the City Council recommendations for the reorganization of offices, departments, and positions which are considered to be in the best interest of efficient, effective and economical conduct of the municipal services provided by the City; and

WHEREAS, Title 2, Section 2.16.020 of the Campbell Municipal Code provides that the City Council may, from time to time, by resolution, change the compensation of employees of said City, and may, by resolution, adopt salary and wage scales; and

WHEREAS, on April 2, 2024, the City Council adopted a new Economic Development Plan intended to create a vibrant, resilient and diversified economy in Campbell fostering business growth, creating local jobs, and increasing tax revenue; and

WHEREAS, the City Council subsequently adopted the City’s Fiscal Year 2024-2025 Budget which included funding to hire an Economic Development Manager to oversee the implementation of the 2024 Economic Development Plan and manage economic development programs within the City; and

WHEREAS, in accordance with Section 3.0 (Classification Plan) of the City’s Personnel Rules and Regulations, staff has drafted a proposed job specification and salary range for the Economic Development Manager classification;

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Campbell does hereby approve adding a new job classification and salary range for an Economic Development Manager position to the City’s Classification and Salary Schedule.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this ______ day of December 2024, by the following roll call vote:

AYES: Councilmembers:

NOES: Councilmembers:

ABSENT: Councilmembers:

APPROVED:

Susan M. Landry, Mayor
ATTEST:

Andrea Sanders, City Clerk

17.a
Packet Pg. 236
Attachment: Resolution - Economic Development Manager Spec (Amending Classification & Salary Schedule to Add Economic Development

CITY OF CAMPBELL

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MANAGER

DEFINITION

Under direction of the City Manager or the City Manager’s designee, plan, develop, organize, implement, and administer the City's economic development programs, plans, activities, policies, and procedures related to the Economic Development Division. Th is position is responsible for economic development programs, including business attraction, business retention/expansion, small business assistance, and marketing/communications, including collaboration with other City divisions and departments, businesses, community organizations, Cit y management, and stakeholders.

TYPICAL DUTIES

• Develop and maintain a business -friendly climate in the City through processes and procedure which are responsive to the needs of the business community; • Develop and implement the goals, objectives, policies, and priority recommendations of the City’s Economic Development Plan;
• Represent the City and establish and maintain positive working relationships with representatives of community organizations, non -profits, business organizations, state and local agencies and associations, city staff, and the general public; • Develop and oversee a City-wide business retention and expansion program to retain and attract businesses that are compatible with the community and with the key drivers of the City’s economy;
• Work closely with other City departments to identify barriers for businesses locating, expanding or doing business in Campbell;
• Work with property owners, prospective tenants, brokers and investors, and developers to match available vacant and underutilized properties with desired commercial and industrial business activities;
• Identify, pursue, and oversee grant and alternative funding opportunities that leverage City resources for economic development activities;
• Assist with the preparation of the Economic Development Division operating budget; assist in budget implementation; participate in the forecast of additional funds needed for staffing, equipment, materials, contract services, and supplies; and administer approved budget;
• Stay abreast on pertinent local, State and Federal regulations that affect businesses and economic development;
• Provide consistent communication with businesses, property owners, stakeholders, broker networks, developers and investors . Provide technical assistance, tools, and techniques used for commercial and downtown revitalization and redevelopment; • Manage economic development tools including GIS mapping systems, demographic research and real estate data gathering tools, and Customer Relationship Management (CRM) systems or tracking systems;

17.b
Packet Pg. 237
Attachment: Job Specs - Economic Development Manager (Amending Classification & Salary Schedule to Add Economic Development

• Identify, monitor, develop, and analyze data to assess market trends, issues, and opportunities that expand tax revenues and support business expansion; • Recommend revisions to City ordinances and policies to assist business operations in the City’s economic centers and other business corridors to improve economic conditions, functionality, aesthetics and public safety;
• Plan, prepare, and implement marketing strategies and promotions , special events and activities, and business assistance services for the City’s Downtown, commercial, and industrial areas; and
• Perform other related duties as required.

EMPLOYMENT STANDARDS

Education and Experience: Equivalent to a Bachelor’s degree from an accredited college or university in business administration, public administration, urban planning, economics, or a closely related field; and, five years of increasingly responsible experience in economic development, real estate financing and development, redevelopment, and planning, including one year of supervisory responsibility. A Master’s degree in a related field may be substituted for one year of the required experience. Experience working in or with the public sector is highly desirable.

Knowledge of:

• Principles, practices, policies and current trends of public administration , economic development, land use, real estate development, and redevelopment; • Pertinent Federal, State, and local rules and regulations related to economic development, public land acquisition, and redevelopment;
• Federal, State, and local programs and resources for economic development and business assistance;
• Joint public and private sector approaches and techniques to stimulate economic activity in urban areas;
• Techniques used for commercial and downtown revitalization and redevelopment; • Public financial reporting, budgeting, fiscal and economic analysis for development and policy impacts;
• Public tax revenue monitoring;
• Principles and practices of business correspondence and report writing; • Principle and practices of public information and marketing such as social media, web pages, and email distribution lists;
• Principles and practices of organization, administration, budget, leadership and personnel management; and
• Principles and practices of workplace safety.

Ability to:

• Organize, direct, and implement comprehensive economic development programs;

17.b
Packet Pg. 238
Attachment: Job Specs - Economic Development Manager (Amending Classification & Salary Schedule to Add Economic Development

• Implement all strategic initiatives and priority actions of the City’s Economic Development Plan;
• Prepare and administer an operating budget;
• Conduct complex economic and market analysis;
• Negotiate and manage professional consulting service contracts; • Establish and execute comprehensive work plans in a timely and competent manner; • Prioritize assignments and workload appropriately and respond to deadlines effectively; • Make oral presentations, as needed, to clearly convey information and concepts; • Develop effective marketing, and outreach materials;
• Exercise good judgment and sound decision making;
• Problem-solve and implement creative solutions;
• Supervise and mentor staff, and exercise informal authority to build consensus and foster innovation at all levels;
• Establish and maintain a positive and effective working relationships with those contacted in the course of work;
• On a continuous basis, sit at desk and in meetings for long periods of time; • Intermittently twist to reach equipment surrounding desk; • Perform simple grasping and fine manipulation;
• Communicated effectively, both orally and in writing; and • Lift or carry weight of 30 pounds or less.

Possession of: Valid California Driver's License.

Supplemental Information:

In compliance with the American with Disabilities Act, the City of Campbell will provide reasonable accommodation to qualified individuals with disabilities and encourages both prospective and current employees to discuss potential accommodations with the Human Resources Division.

Established 12/24

17.b
Packet Pg. 239
Attachment: Job Specs - Economic Development Manager (Amending Classification & Salary Schedule to Add Economic Development

City
Council
Report

TITLE: Market Adjustments for Specified Classifications Within Represented Labor Groups (Resolution/Roll Call Vote)

RECOMMENDED ACTION

That the City Council adopt a resolution amending the Classification and Salary Schedule to include salary adjustments to job classifications within represented labor groups that are below the labor market mean.

BACKGROUND

Government Code Sections 20636 and 7522.34 and California Code of Regulations Sections 570.5 and 571.1 require that the City of Campbell (City) ’s pay rates be reported pursuant to a publicly available pay schedule that has been duly approved and adopted by the employer, in accordance with applicable public meeting laws.

On November 4, 2016, the California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS) issued and distributed Circular Letter 200 -050-161, titled “STATUTORY AND

REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS FOR COMPENSATION EARNABLE AND
PUBLICLY AVAILABLE PAY SCHEDULES”. This Circular Letter reinforces the requirement under California Government Code Section 20636(d) that “Notwithstanding any other provision of law, payrate and special compensation schedules, ordinances, or similar documents shall be public records available for public scrutiny” 2. Additionally, the California Code of Regulations Section 570.5 specifies the required elements necessary to meet the definitions of a publicly available pay schedule, and an overview of these requirements is as follows3:

1. Has been duly approved and adopted by the employer's governing body in accordance with requirements of applicable public meetings laws;

2. Identifies the position title for every employee position;

3. Shows the payrate for each identified position, which may be stated as a single amount or as multiple amounts within a range;

1 CalPERS Circular Letter - https://www.calpers.ca.gov/docs/circular-letters/2016/200-050-16.pdf 2 California GC -
https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=GOV&sectionNum=20636 3 CCR -
https://govt.westlaw.com/calregs/Document/I95DD93C0B3D411E09050C5E1F9C85A98?viewType=FullText &originationContext=documenttoc&transitionType=DocumentItem&contextData=(sc.Default) Item: 18
Category: NEW BUSINESS
Meeting Date: December 3, 2024
18 Packet Pg. 240
Market Adjustments for Specified Classifications Within Represented Labor Groups Page 2 of 5

4. Indicates the time base, including, but not limited to, whether the time base is hourly, daily, bi-weekly, monthly, bi-monthly, or annually;

5. Is posted at the office of the employer or immediately accessible and available for public review from the employer during normal business hours or posted on the employer's internet website;

6. Indicates an effective date and date of any revisions;

7. Is retained by the employer and available for public inspection for not less than five years; and

8. Does not reference another document in lieu of disclosing the payrate.

2022 Total Compensation Studies:

In order to retain our current workforce and attract a strong candidate pool, in March 2022, the City conducted a comprehensive total compensation study that was facilitated by Bryce Consulting. This study encompassed all members of Campbell Municipal Employees Association (CMEA), Campbell Police Civilian Employees Association (CPCEA), Carpenters Local 405/Northern California Carpenters Regional Council (CARP), and Campbell Peace Officers’ Association (CPOA), and was aimed to align the City's total compensation packages with the labor market mean.

The study provided the City with valuable insight into the compensation landscape at the time the study was performed, and enabled a thorough understanding of any discrepancies that existed. The assessment also covered various aspects of compensation, including salaries, benefits, and additional incentives, with the goal of evaluating the overall total compensation received by employees.

As a result of the study, labor negotiations, and a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with all represented labor groups in 2022 and 2023, all members of the above labor groups whose job classifications were below the labor market mean received market adjustments to bring their compensation to the labor market mean.

2024 Total Compensation Studies:

The negotiated MOUs also provided that within year 3 of the respective contracts, a second compensation study would be performed; and, benchmarked classifications that were again found to be below the labor market mean would be adjusted to the labor market mean. The timing of those studies and any required adjustments are as follows:

Labor Group Timeline for Study Effective Date of Adjustment

CMEA Year 3 of MOU 1st full pay period in July 2024

CPCEA By August 12, 2024 1st full pay period in September 2024

CARP Year 3 of MOU 1st full pay period including July 1, 2024

18 Packet Pg. 241
Market Adjustments for Specified Classifications Within Represented Labor Groups Page 3 of 5 Unlike CMEA, CPCEA and CARP, whose MOUs run on a fiscal year, CPOA’s MOU runs on a calendar year, with the third full year beginning January 1, 2025. Accordingly, a total compensation study for CPOA benchmarked positions will be conducted in the next calendar year.

Per the terms of the MOUs with CMEA, CPCEA and CARP, from February through August of 2024, staff again worked with Bryce Consulting to conduct total compensation studies for all the benchmarked positions within each labor group. Once the studies were complete, staff shared the results with the respective labor groups and provided each group with an opportunity to meet with staff and Bryce Consulting to respond to the study, ask questions, and/or challenge the findings. Staff has recently completed its discussions with each of the above labor groups and recommends City Council approve the adjustments detailed below by adopting a resolution updating the City’s Classification and Salary Schedule to include the same.

DISCUSSION

After review and discussion of the results from the total compensation studies with CMEA, CPCEA and CARP, three job classifications within the represented labor groups were found to be below the labor market mean – Dispatcher, Lighting & Traffic Signal Technician, and Maintenance Worker II. When the City explored why these positions continue to fall below the labor market mean, the City learned that they either require unique skills and/or individuals qualified and available to fill these positions are dif ficult to retain, resulting in higher salary ranges.

Based on the study’s findings, staff recommends the City Council approve updates to the Classification and Salary Schedule to include the adjustments identified below, to be effective at the times set forth below:

Labor Group Position(s)
Requiring
Adjustment
% of
Adjustment
Effective Date of Adjustment

CMEA

NONE

N/A

N/A
CPCEA

Dispatcher .72 % 1st PPD in September 2024
CARP

Lighting & Traffic
Signal Tech

5.46 % 1st PPD Including July 1, 2024
CARP Maintenance
Worker II

.11 % 1st PPD Including July 1, 2024

18 Packet Pg. 242
Market Adjustments for Specified Classifications Within Represented Labor Groups Page 4 of 5 Exhibit A to this report is the Classification and Salary Schedule which includes the compensation adjustments recommended above, and the new Economic Development Manager classification that is being discussed under a related item on the City Council’s December 3, 2024 Meeting Agenda.

FISCAL IMPACT
The adjustments recommended by staff will be retroactive to the effective date provided for in the table above and would result in an impact of approximately $23,000 in FY 2025. This can be absorbed into existing operating budgets and staff is not requesting a budget adjustment at this time.

ALTERNATIVES

1. Do not approve the recommendation to update the City’s Classification and Salary Schedule. Staff does not recommend this alternative as the adjustments recommended are required by the MOU negotiated with the specified labor groups.

2. Direct staff to conduct another total compensation study for the impacted benchmarked classifications.

3. Direct staff to take other action.

Prepared by:

Angelique Gaeta, Assistant City Manager
Approved by:

Brian Loventhal, City Manager
18 Packet Pg. 243
Market Adjustments for Specified Classifications Within Represented Labor Groups Page 5 of 5 Attachment:
a. Resolution - Amending Classification and Salary Schedule for Market Adjustments 18 Packet Pg. 244
RESOLUTION NO. __________

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CAMPBELL AMENDING THE CITY OF CAMPBELL’S CLASSIFICATION AND SALARY

SCHEDULE TO INCLUDE ADJUSTMENTS TO JOB CLASSIFICATIONS WITHIN

REPRESENTED LABOR GROUPS THAT ARE BELOW LABOR MARKET MEAN, AS SPECIFIED.

WHEREAS, Government Code Sections 20636 and 7522.34 and California Code of Regulations Sections 570.5 and 571.1 require that the City’s pay rates be reported pursuant to a publicly available pay schedule that has been duly approved and adopted by the employer, in accordance with applicable public meeting laws; and

WHEREAS, Title 2, Section 2.16.020 of the Campbell Municipal Code provides that the City Council may, from time to time, by resolution, change the compensation of employees of said City, and may, by resolution, adopt salary and wage scales; and

WHEREAS, pursuant to Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) s negotiated in 2022 with Campbell Municipal Employees Association (CMEA), Campbell Police Civilian Employees Association (CPCEA), and Carpenters Local 405/Northern California Carpenters Regional Council (CARP), in year 3 of the respective contracts, a total compensation study was required to be performed; and, benchmarked classifications that were found to be below the labor market mean would be adjusted to the labor market mean; and

WHEREAS, the results from the total compensation studies with CMEA, CPCEA and CARP included three job classification s that were below the labor market mean – Dispatcher, Lighting & Traffic Signal Technician, and Maintenance Worker II; and

WHEREAS, the compensation adjustments to the Classification and Salary Schedule and their effective dates are set forth below;

Labor Group Position(s)
Requiring
Adjustment
% of
Adjustment
Effective Date of Adjustment

CMEA

NONE

N/A

N/A
CPCEA

Dispatcher .72 % 1st PPD in September 2024
CARP

Lighting & Traffic
Signal Tech

5.46 % 1st PPD Including July 1, 2024
CARP Maintenance Worker
II

.11 % 1st PPD Including July 1, 2024

18.a
Packet Pg. 245
Attachment: Resolution - Amending Classification and Salary Schedule for Market Adjustments (Market Adjustments for Specified

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Campbell does hereby approve the attached Classification and Salary Schedule (Exhibit A) which adjusts the compensation for those classifications identified in the table above as below the labor market mean ; and, per previous City Council Resolution ________, adds a new job classification and salary range for an Economic Development Manager position.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this ______ day of December 2024, by the following roll call vote:

AYES: Councilmembers:

NOES: Councilmembers:

ABSENT: Councilmembers:

APPROVED:

Susan M. Landry, Mayor

ATTEST:

Andrea Sanders, City Clerk

18.a
Packet Pg. 246
Attachment: Resolution - Amending Classification and Salary Schedule for Market Adjustments (Market Adjustments for Specified Effective: 07/08/2024

CLASS CD JOB TITLE
Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5
3180 ACCOUNTANT CME10 CMEA Hourly 53.47 56.09 58.93 61.87 64.96 Bi-Weekly 4,277.60 4,487.20 4,714.40 4,949.60 5,196.80 Monthly 9,268.13 9,722.27 10,214.53 10,724.13 11,259.73 Annual 111,217.60 116,667.20 122,574.40 128,689.60 135,116.80 3355 ACCT CLERK II CME28 CMEA Hourly 44.23 46.40 48.71 51.17 53.67 Bi-Weekly 3,538.40 3,712.00 3,896.80 4,093.60 4,293.60 Monthly 7,666.53 8,042.67 8,443.07 8,869.47 9,302.80 Annual 91,998.40 96,512.00 101,316.80 106,433.60 111,633.60 3417 ACCT CLK I CME38 CMEA Hourly 37.49 39.40 41.36 43.46 45.60 Bi-Weekly 2,999.20 3,152.00 3,308.80 3,476.80 3,648.00 Monthly 6,498.27 6,829.33 7,169.07 7,533.07 7,904.00 Annual 77,979.20 81,952.00 86,028.80 90,396.80 94,848.00 3151 ADMIN ANALYST I CME07 CMEA Hourly 58.32 61.27 64.31 67.49 70.94 Bi-Weekly 4,665.60 4,901.60 5,144.80 5,399.20 5,675.20 Monthly 10,108.80 10,620.13 11,147.07 11,698.27 12,296.27 Annual 121,305.60 127,441.60 133,764.80 140,379.20 147,555.20 1195 ADMN ANALYST II MGR18 MGMT Hourly 58.60 61.52 64.61 67.83 71.25 Bi-Weekly 4,688.00 4,921.60 5,168.80 5,426.40 5,700.00 Monthly 10,157.33 10,663.47 11,199.07 11,757.20 12,350.00 Annual 121,888.00 127,961.60 134,388.80 141,086.40 148,200.00 4388 ARBORIST MIL18 CARP Hourly 46.02 48.33 50.73 53.26 55.92 Bi-Weekly 3,681.60 3,866.40 4,058.40 4,260.80 4,473.60 Monthly 7,976.80 8,377.20 8,793.20 9,231.73 9,692.80 Annual 95,721.60 100,526.40 105,518.40 110,780.80 116,313.60 1020 ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER UNC07 UNCL Hourly 107.57 - - - 140.68 Bi-Weekly 8,605.60 - - - 11,254.40
Monthly 18,645.47 - - - 24,384.53
Annual 223,745.60 - - - 292,614.40
3125 ASSIST ENGR CME03 CMEA Hourly 61.15 64.21 67.42 70.78 74.37 Bi-Weekly 4,892.00 5,136.80 5,393.60 5,662.40 5,949.60 Monthly 10,599.33 11,129.73 11,686.13 12,268.53 12,890.80 Annual 127,192.00 133,556.80 140,233.60 147,222.40 154,689.60 3126 ASSISTANT ENGINEER (PPT) CME43 CMEA Hourly 61.15 64.21 67.42 70.78 74.37 Bi-Weekly 4,892.00 5,136.80 5,393.60 5,662.40 5,949.60 Monthly 10,599.33 11,129.73 11,686.13 12,268.53 12,890.80 Annual 127,192.00 133,556.80 140,233.60 147,222.40 154,689.60 1104 ASSISTANT FINANCE DIRECTOR MGR27 MGMT Hourly 85.67 90.18 94.91 99.91 105.17 Bi-Weekly 6,853.60 7,214.40 7,592.80 7,992.80 8,413.60 Monthly 14,849.47 15,631.20 16,451.07 17,317.73 18,229.47 Annual 178,193.60 187,574.40 197,412.80 207,812.80 218,753.60 3124 ASSOC CIVIL ENGR CME02 CMEA Hourly 69.01 72.47 76.12 79.90 83.91 Bi-Weekly 5,520.80 5,797.60 6,089.60 6,392.00 6,712.80 Monthly 11,961.73 12,561.47 13,194.13 13,849.33 14,544.40 Annual 143,540.80 150,737.60 158,329.60 166,192.00 174,532.80 3190 ASSOCIATE PLANNER CME14 CMEA Hourly 62.67 65.79 69.05 72.53 76.15 Bi-Weekly 5,013.60 5,263.20 5,524.00 5,802.40 6,092.00 Monthly 10,862.80 11,403.60 11,968.67 12,571.87 13,199.33 Annual 130,353.60 136,843.20 143,624.00 150,862.40 158,392.00 3290 ASSISTANT PLANNER CME23 CMEA Hourly 53.62 56.30 59.12 62.09 65.16 Bi-Weekly 4,289.60 4,504.00 4,729.60 4,967.20 5,212.80 Monthly 9,294.13 9,758.67 10,247.47 10,762.27 11,294.40 Annual 111,529.60 117,104.00 122,969.60 129,147.20 135,532.80 1167 ASST TO CM MGR14 MGMT Hourly 71.57 75.18 78.94 82.87 87.00 Bi-Weekly 5,725.60 6,014.40 6,315.20 6,629.60 6,960.00 Monthly 12,405.47 13,031.20 13,682.93 14,364.13 15,080.00 Annual 148,865.60 156,374.40 164,195.20 172,369.60 180,960.00

CITY OF CAMPBELL

POSITION CLASSIFICATION - ALL GROUPS
FY 24/25- SALARY SCHEDULE

STEP RANGES
Range
[Page]1
Exhibit A18.a
Packet Pg. 247
Attachment: Resolution - Amending Classification and Salary Schedule for Market Adjustments (Market Adjustments for Specified Effective: 07/08/2024

CLASS CD JOB TITLE
Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5

CITY OF CAMPBELL

POSITION CLASSIFICATION - ALL GROUPS
FY 24/25- SALARY SCHEDULE

STEP RANGES
Range
3150 BLDG INSPECTOR CME06 CMEA Hourly 59.28 62.23 65.35 68.62 72.08 Bi-Weekly 4,742.40 4,978.40 5,228.00 5,489.60 5,766.40 Monthly 10,275.20 10,786.53 11,327.33 11,894.13 12,493.87 Annual 123,302.40 129,438.40 135,928.00 142,729.60 149,926.40 3305 BLDG MNT LEAD WKR CME24 CMEA Hourly 49.51 51.98 54.56 57.33 60.21 Bi-Weekly 3,960.80 4,158.40 4,364.80 4,586.40 4,816.80 Monthly 8,581.73 9,009.87 9,457.07 9,937.20 10,436.40 Annual 102,980.80 108,118.40 113,484.80 119,246.40 125,236.80 3338 BLDG MNT WKR CME25 CMEA Hourly 45.01 47.31 49.64 52.12 54.78 Bi-Weekly 3,600.80 3,784.80 3,971.20 4,169.60 4,382.40 Monthly 7,801.73 8,200.40 8,604.27 9,034.13 9,495.20 Annual 93,620.80 98,404.80 103,251.20 108,409.60 113,942.40 1080 BLDG OFFICIAL MGR04 MGMT Hourly 80.33 84.38 88.59 93.00 97.66 Bi-Weekly 6,426.40 6,750.40 7,087.20 7,440.00 7,812.80 Monthly 13,923.87 14,625.87 15,355.60 16,120.00 16,927.73 Annual 167,086.40 175,510.40 184,267.20 193,440.00 203,132.80 1241 BUILDING MNT SUPERVISOR MGR23 MGMT Hourly 61.57 64.64 67.88 71.28 74.86 Bi-Weekly 4,925.60 5,171.20 5,430.40 5,702.40 5,988.80 Monthly 10,672.13 11,204.27 11,765.87 12,355.20 12,975.73 Annual 128,065.60 134,451.20 141,190.40 148,262.40 155,708.80 7425 CITY ATTORNEY ATTY Hourly 206.40 - - - - B
i-Weekly 16,512.00 -
-
-
-
M
onthly 35,776.00 -
-
-
-
A
nnual 429,312.00 -
-
-
-
1160 CI
TY CLERK MGR13 MGMT Hourly 75.45 79.19 83.18 87.31 91.69 Bi-Weekly 6,036.00 6,335.20 6,654.40 6,984.80 7,335.20 Monthly 13,078.00 13,726.27 14,417.87 15,133.73 15,892.93 Annual 156,936.00 164,715.20 173,014.40 181,604.80 190,715.20 1068 CITY ENGR MGR02 MGMT Hourly 99.45 104.45 109.65 115.13 120.89 Bi-Weekly 7,956.00 8,356.00 8,772.00 9,210.40 9,671.20 Monthly 17,238.00 18,104.67 19,006.00 19,955.87 20,954.27 Annual 206,856.00 217,256.00 228,072.00 239,470.40 251,451.20 1005 CITY MANAGER UNC01 CMGR Hourly 172.54 -
-
-
-
B
i-Weekly 13,803.20 -
-
-
-
M
onthly 29,906.93 -
-
-
-
A
nnual 358,883.20 -
-
-
-
3187 CODE
ENF OFCR CME13 CMEA Hourly 55.49 58.26 61.15 64.23 67.42 Bi-Weekly 4,439.20 4,660.80 4,892.00 5,138.40 5,393.60 Monthly 9,618.27 10,098.40 10,599.33 11,133.20 11,686.13 Annual 115,419.20 121,180.80 127,192.00 133,598.40 140,233.60 3153 COMM & PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT COORD CME53 CMEA Hourly 57.09 59.96 62.95 66.10 69.40 Bi-Weekly 4,567.20 4,796.80 5,036.00 5,288.00 5,552.00 Monthly 9,895.60 10,393.07 10,911.33 11,457.33 12,029.33 Annual 118,747.20 124,716.80 130,936.00 137,488.00 144,352.00 1170 COMM CTR MGR MGR15 MGMT Hourly 71.57 75.18 78.94 82.87 87.00 Bi-Weekly 5,725.60 6,014.40 6,315.20 6,629.60 6,960.00 Monthly 12,405.47 13,031.20 13,682.93 14,364.13 15,080.00 Annual 148,865.60 156,374.40 164,195.20 172,369.60 180,960.00 5362 COMM SERV OFFICER CPC07 CPCEA Hourly 41.81 43.93 46.11 48.45 50.87 Bi-Weekly 3,344.80 3,514.40 3,688.80 3,876.00 4,069.60 Monthly 7,247.07 7,614.53 7,992.40 8,398.00 8,817.47 Annual 86,964.80 91,374.40 95,908.80 100,776.00 105,809.60 5185 COMM SPVSR CPC01 CPCEA Hourly 59.88 62.90 66.03 69.33 72.87 Bi-Weekly 4,790.40 5,032.00 5,282.40 5,546.40 5,829.60 Monthly 10,379.20 10,902.67 11,445.20 12,017.20 12,630.80 Annual 124,550.40 130,832.00 137,342.40 144,206.40 151,569.60 [Page]2

18.a
Packet Pg. 248
Attachment: Resolution - Amending Classification and Salary Schedule for Market Adjustments (Market Adjustments for Specified Effective: 07/08/2024

CLASS CD JOB TITLE
Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5

CITY OF CAMPBELL

POSITION CLASSIFICATION - ALL GROUPS
FY 24/25- SALARY SCHEDULE

STEP RANGES
Range
1030 COMM. DEV. DIRECTOR UNC05 UNCL Hourly 106.85 - - - 139.75 Bi-Weekly 8,548.00 -
-
-
11,180.00
Monthly 18,520.67 -
-
-
24,223.33
Annual 222,248.00 -
-
-
290,680.00
5363 COMMUNITY SVCS OFCR (PPT) CPC08 CPCEA Hourly 41.81 43.93 46.11 48.45 50.87 Bi-Weekly 3,344.80 3,514.40 3,688.80 3,876.00 4,069.60 Monthly 7,247.07 7,614.53 7,992.40 8,398.00 8,817.47 Annual 86,964.80 91,374.40 95,908.80 100,776.00 105,809.60 7420 COUNCILMEMBER CMBR Hourly 4.14 -
-
-
-
B
i-Weekly 331.20 -
-
-
-
M
onthly 717.60 -
-
-
-
A
nnual 8,611.20 -
-
-
-
1168 DE
PUTY CITY MANAGER MGR24 MGMT Hourly 80.27 84.26 88.49 92.92 97.57 Bi-Weekly 6,421.60 6,740.80 7,079.20 7,433.60 7,805.60 Monthly 13,913.47 14,605.07 15,338.27 16,106.13 16,912.13 Annual 166,961.60 175,260.80 184,059.20 193,273.60 202,945.60 3345 DPTY CITY CLERK CME26 CMEA Hourly 44.52 46.74 49.08 51.49 54.09 Bi-Weekly 3,561.60 3,739.20 3,926.40 4,119.20 4,327.20 Monthly 7,716.80 8,101.60 8,507.20 8,924.93 9,375.60 Annual 92,601.60 97,219.20 102,086.40 107,099.20 112,507.20 1174 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MANAGER MGR29 MGMT Hourly 78.13 82.03 86.13 90.44 94.96 Bi-Weekly 6,250.40 6,562.40 6,890.40 7,235.20 7,596.80 Monthly 13,542.53 14,218.53 14,929.20 15,676.27 16,459.73 Annual 162,510.40 170,622.40 179,150.40 188,115.20 197,516.80 3194 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SPECIALIST CME54 CMEA Hourly 43.90 46.10 48.41 50.82 53.36 Bi-Weekly 3,512.00 3,688.00 3,872.80 4,065.60 4,268.80 Monthly 7,609.33 7,990.67 8,391.07 8,808.80 9,249.07 Annual 91,312.00 95,888.00 100,692.80 105,705.60 110,988.80 3917 EMERGENCY SERVICES COORDINATOR CME43 CMEA Hourly 61.91 65.18 68.61 72.21 76.01 Bi-Weekly 4,952.80 5,214.40 5,488.80 5,776.80 6,080.80 Monthly 10,731.07 11,297.87 11,892.40 12,516.40 13,175.07 Annual 128,772.80 135,574.40 142,708.80 150,196.80 158,100.80 3372 ENGR AIDE I CME33 CMEA Hourly 41.16 43.22 45.40 47.67 50.06 Bi-Weekly 3,292.80 3,457.60 3,632.00 3,813.60 4,004.80 Monthly 7,134.40 7,491.47 7,869.33 8,262.80 8,677.07 Annual 85,612.80 89,897.60 94,432.00 99,153.60 104,124.80 3287 ENGR AIDE II CME22 CMEA Hourly 46.74 49.06 51.53 54.10 56.80 Bi-Weekly 3,739.20 3,924.80 4,122.40 4,328.00 4,544.00 Monthly 8,101.60 8,503.73 8,931.87 9,377.33 9,845.33 Annual 97,219.20 102,044.80 107,182.40 112,528.00 118,144.00 3225 ENGR TECH I CME18 CMEA Hourly 48.91 51.32 53.88 56.60 59.43 Bi-Weekly 3,912.80 4,105.60 4,310.40 4,528.00 4,754.40 Monthly 8,477.73 8,895.47 9,339.20 9,810.67 10,301.20 Annual 101,732.80 106,745.60 112,070.40 117,728.00 123,614.40 3130 ENGR TECH II CME04 CMEA Hourly 55.41 58.20 61.11 64.16 67.36 Bi-Weekly 4,432.80 4,656.00 4,888.80 5,132.80 5,388.80 Monthly 9,604.40 10,088.00 10,592.40 11,121.07 11,675.73 Annual 115,252.80 121,056.00 127,108.80 133,452.80 140,108.80 3195 ENVIRONMENTAL PRGMS SPECIALIST CME55 CMEA Hourly 43.27 45.44 47.70 50.09 52.60 Bi-Weekly 3,461.60 3,635.20 3,816.00 4,007.20 4,208.00 Monthly 7,500.13 7,876.27 8,268.00 8,682.27 9,117.33 Annual 90,001.60 94,515.20 99,216.00 104,187.20 109,408.00 4235 EQUIP MNT SPVSR MIL04 CARP Hourly 54.28 57.00 59.80 62.83 65.94 Bi-Weekly 4,342.40 4,560.00 4,784.00 5,026.40 5,275.20 Monthly 9,408.53 9,880.00 10,365.33 10,890.53 11,429.60 Annual 112,902.40 118,560.00 124,384.00 130,686.40 137,155.20 [Page]3

18.a
Packet Pg. 249
Attachment: Resolution - Amending Classification and Salary Schedule for Market Adjustments (Market Adjustments for Specified Effective: 07/08/2024

CLASS CD JOB TITLE
Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5

CITY OF CAMPBELL

POSITION CLASSIFICATION - ALL GROUPS
FY 24/25- SALARY SCHEDULE

STEP RANGES
Range
2321 EXEC ASSIST TO CM (CONF) (PPT) CON05 CONF Hourly 51.71 54.24 56.99 59.84 62.83 Bi-Weekly 4,136.80 4,339.20 4,559.20 4,787.20 5,026.40 Monthly 8,963.07 9,401.60 9,878.27 10,372.27 10,890.53 Annual 107,556.80 112,819.20 118,539.20 124,467.20 130,686.40 3152 EXEC ASSISTANT (PPT) CME46 CMEA Hourly 44.52 46.74 49.08 51.49 54.09 Bi-Weekly 3,561.60 3,739.20 3,926.40 4,119.20 4,327.20 Monthly 7,716.80 8,101.60 8,507.20 8,924.93 9,375.60 Annual 92,601.60 97,219.20 102,086.40 107,099.20 112,507.20 2320 EXEC ASST TO CM (CONF) CON02 CONF Hourly 51.71 54.24 56.99 59.84 62.83 Bi-Weekly 4,136.80 4,339.20 4,559.20 4,787.20 5,026.40 Monthly 8,963.07 9,401.60 9,878.27 10,372.27 10,890.53 Annual 107,556.80 112,819.20 118,539.20 124,467.20 130,686.40 3350 EXECUTIVE ASST CME27 CMEA Hourly 44.52 46.74 49.08 51.49 54.09 Bi-Weekly 3,561.60 3,739.20 3,926.40 4,119.20 4,327.20 Monthly 7,716.80 8,101.60 8,507.20 8,924.93 9,375.60 Annual 92,601.60 97,219.20 102,086.40 107,099.20 112,507.20 1025 FINANCE DIRECTOR UNC06 UNCL Hourly 106.29 - -
-
139.00
Bi-Weekly 8,503.20 -
-
-
11,120.00
Monthly 18,423.60 -
-
-
24,093.33
Annual 221,083.20 -
-
-
289,120.00
1105 FINANCE MGR MGR09 MGMT Hourly 81.33 85.38 89.68 94.16 98.87 Bi-Weekly 6,506.40 6,830.40 7,174.40 7,532.80 7,909.60 Monthly 14,097.20 14,799.20 15,544.53 16,321.07 17,137.47 Annual 169,166.40 177,590.40 186,534.40 195,852.80 205,649.60 3905 HCD COORDINATOR (PPT) CME39 CMEA -
-
-
-
-
1173 HOUS
ING MANAGER MGR28 MGMT Hourly 71.33 75.08 79.03 83.19 87.57 Bi-Weekly 5,706.40 6,006.40 6,322.40 6,655.20 7,005.60 Monthly 12,363.87 13,013.87 13,698.53 14,419.60 15,178.80 Annual 148,366.40 156,166.40 164,382.40 173,035.20 182,145.60 2932 HR ANALYST CON06 CONF Hourly 58.16 61.10 64.15 67.34 70.73 Bi-Weekly 4,652.80 4,888.00 5,132.00 5,387.20 5,658.40 M
onthly 10,081.07 10,590.67 11,119.33 11,672.27 12,259.87 Annual 120,972.80 127,088.00 133,432.00 140,067.20 147,118.40 2931 HR REPRESENTATIVE (CONF) FULL-TIME CON04 CONF Hourly 46.64 48.96 51.42 53.99 56.66 Bi-Weekly 3,731.20 3,916.80 4,113.60 4,319.20 4,532.80 Monthly 8,084.27 8,486.40 8,912.80 9,358.27 9,821.07 Annual 97,011.20 101,836.80 106,953.60 112,299.20 117,852.80 2930 HR REPRESENTATIVE (CONF)* CON04 CONF Hourly 46.64 48.96 51.42 53.99 56.66 Bi-Weekly 3,731.20 3,916.80 4,113.60 4,319.20 4,532.80 Monthly 8,084.27 8,486.40 8,912.80 9,358.27 9,821.07 Annual 97,011.20 101,836.80 106,953.60 112,299.20 117,852.80 1140 HUMAN RESOURCES MANAGER MGR12 MGMT Hourly 95.31 100.07 105.08 110.35 115.88 Bi-Weekly 7,624.80 8,005.60 8,406.40 8,828.00 9,270.40 Monthly 16,520.40 17,345.47 18,213.87 19,127.33 20,085.87 Annual 198,244.80 208,145.60 218,566.40 229,528.00 241,030.40 3181 IT ADMINISTRATOR CME11 CMEA Hourly 67.84 71.23 74.79 78.53 82.46 Bi-Weekly 5,427.20 5,698.40 5,983.20 6,282.40 6,596.80 Monthly 11,758.93 12,346.53 12,963.60 13,611.87 14,293.07 Annual 141,107.20 148,158.40 155,563.20 163,342.40 171,516.80 1106 IT MANAGER MGR10 MGMT Hourly 83.22 87.37 91.78 96.34 101.14 Bi-Weekly 6,657.60 6,989.60 7,342.40 7,707.20 8,091.20 Monthly 14,424.80 15,144.13 15,908.53 16,698.93 17,530.93 Annual 173,097.60 181,729.60 190,902.40 200,387.20 210,371.20 [Page]4

18.a
Packet Pg. 250
Attachment: Resolution - Amending Classification and Salary Schedule for Market Adjustments (Market Adjustments for Specified Effective: 07/08/2024

CLASS CD JOB TITLE
Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5

CITY OF CAMPBELL

POSITION CLASSIFICATION - ALL GROUPS
FY 24/25- SALARY SCHEDULE

STEP RANGES
Range
3182 IT TECHNICIAN CME12 CMEA Hourly 57.08 59.96 62.95 66.11 69.39 Bi-Weekly 4,566.40 4,796.80 5,036.00 5,288.80 5,551.20 Monthly 9,893.87 10,393.07 10,911.33 11,459.07 12,027.60 Annual 118,726.40 124,716.80 130,936.00 137,508.80 144,331.20 3183 IT TECHNICIAN (PPT) CME44 CMEA Hourly 57.08 59.96 62.95 66.11 69.39 Bi-Weekly 4,566.40 4,796.80 5,036.00 5,288.80 5,551.20 Monthly 9,893.87 10,393.07 10,911.33 11,459.07 12,027.60 Annual 118,726.40 124,716.80 130,936.00 137,508.80 144,331.20 3262 JUNIOR ENGR CME21 CMEA Hourly 53.95 56.62 59.44 62.42 65.53 Bi-Weekly 4,316.00 4,529.60 4,755.20 4,993.60 5,242.40 Monthly 9,351.33 9,814.13 10,302.93 10,819.47 11,358.53 Annual 112,216.00 117,769.60 123,635.20 129,833.60 136,302.40 4212 LGT/TRF SIG ASSIST MIL03 CARP Hourly 43.96 46.23 48.51 50.92 53.46 Bi-Weekly 3,516.80 3,698.40 3,880.80 4,073.60 4,276.80 Monthly 7,619.73 8,013.20 8,408.40 8,826.13 9,266.40 Annual 91,436.80 96,158.40 100,900.80 105,913.60 111,196.80 4210 LGT/TRF SIG SPVSR MIL01 CARP Hourly 63.21 66.37 69.68 73.18 76.84 Bi-Weekly 5,056.80 5,309.60 5,574.40 5,854.40 6,147.20 Monthly 10,956.40 11,504.13 12,077.87 12,684.53 13,318.93 Annual 131,476.80 138,049.60 144,934.40 152,214.40 159,827.20 4211 LGT/TRF SIG TECH MIL02 CARP Hourly 55.76 58.53 61.45 64.52 67.77 Bi-Weekly 4,460.80 4,682.40 4,916.00 5,161.60 5,421.60 Monthly 9,665.07 10,145.20 10,651.33 11,183.47 11,746.80 Annual 115,980.80 121,742.40 127,816.00 134,201.60 140,961.60 4386 MAINTENANCE WORKER I MIL15 CARP Hourly 34.46 36.15 37.96 39.89 41.89 Bi-Weekly 2,756.80 2,892.00 3,036.80 3,191.20 3,351.20 Monthly 5,973.07 6,266.00 6,579.73 6,914.27 7,260.93 Annual 71,676.80 75,192.00 78,956.80 82,971.20 87,131.20 4387 MAINTENANCE WORKER II MIL16 CARP Hourly 38.09 39.98 42.00 44.09 46.30 Bi-Weekly 3,047.20 3,198.40 3,360.00 3,527.20 3,704.00 Monthly 6,602.27 6,929.87 7,280.00 7,642.27 8,025.33 Annual 79,227.20 83,158.40 87,360.00 91,707.20 96,304.00 4332 MECHANIC I MIL10 CARP Hourly 37.73 39.68 41.62 43.71 45.89 Bi-Weekly 3,018.40 3,174.40 3,329.60 3,496.80 3,671.20 Monthly 6,539.87 6,877.87 7,214.13 7,576.40 7,954.27 Annual 78,478.40 82,534.40 86,569.60 90,916.80 95,451.20 4333 MECHANIC I (PPT)* MIL14 CARP Hourly 37.73 39.68 41.62 43.71 45.89 Bi-Weekly 3,018.40 3,174.40 3,329.60 3,496.80 3,671.20 Monthly 6,539.87 6,877.87 7,214.13 7,576.40 7,954.27 Annual 78,478.40 82,534.40 86,569.60 90,916.80 95,451.20 4270 MECHANIC II MIL05 CARP Hourly 44.14 46.33 48.68 51.13 53.66 Bi-Weekly 3,531.20 3,706.40 3,894.40 4,090.40 4,292.80 Monthly 7,650.93 8,030.53 8,437.87 8,862.53 9,301.07 Annual 91,811.20 96,366.40 101,254.40 106,350.40 111,612.80 4334 MECHANIC II (PPT)* MIL17 CARP Hourly 44.14 46.33 48.68 51.13 53.66 Bi-Weekly 3,531.20 3,706.40 3,894.40 4,090.40 4,292.80 Monthly 7,650.93 8,030.53 8,437.87 8,862.53 9,301.07 Annual 91,811.20 96,366.40 101,254.40 106,350.40 111,612.80 3369 MUSEUM COLLECTIONS SPECIALIST CME48 CMEA Hourly 31.88 34.08 36.37 38.84 41.47 Bi-Weekly 2,550.40 2,726.40 2,909.60 3,107.20 3,317.60 Monthly 5,525.87 5,907.20 6,304.13 6,732.27 7,188.13 Annual 66,310.40 70,886.40 75,649.60 80,787.20 86,257.60 3366 MUSEUM ED COORDINATOR CME30 CMEA Hourly 41.72 43.82 45.98 48.25 50.70 Bi-Weekly 3,337.60 3,505.60 3,678.40 3,860.00 4,056.00 Monthly 7,231.47 7,595.47 7,969.87 8,363.33 8,788.00 Annual 86,777.60 91,145.60 95,638.40 100,360.00 105,456.00 [Page]5

18.a
Packet Pg. 251
Attachment: Resolution - Amending Classification and Salary Schedule for Market Adjustments (Market Adjustments for Specified Effective: 07/08/2024

CLASS CD JOB TITLE
Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5

CITY OF CAMPBELL

POSITION CLASSIFICATION - ALL GROUPS
FY 24/25- SALARY SCHEDULE

STEP RANGES
Range
3915 NTR STE MGR (PPT)* CME41 CMEA Hourly 26.50 27.86 29.24 30.70 32.24 Bi-Weekly 2,120.00 2,228.80 2,339.20 2,456.00 2,579.20 Monthly 4,593.33 4,829.07 5,068.27 5,321.33 5,588.27 Annual 55,120.00 57,948.80 60,819.20 63,856.00 67,059.20 3400 OFFICE ASST CME35 CMEA Hourly 36.58 38.41 40.40 42.36 44.53 Bi-Weekly 2,926.40 3,072.80 3,232.00 3,388.80 3,562.40 Monthly 6,340.53 6,657.73 7,002.67 7,342.40 7,718.53 Annual 76,086.40 79,892.80 84,032.00 88,108.80 92,622.40 3910 OFFICE ASST (PPT)* CME40 CMEA Hourly 36.58 38.41 40.40 42.36 44.53 Bi-Weekly 2,926.40 3,072.80 3,232.00 3,388.80 3,562.40 Monthly 6,340.53 6,657.73 7,002.67 7,342.40 7,718.53 Annual 76,086.40 79,892.80 84,032.00 88,108.80 92,622.40 2375 OFFICE SPEC (CONF) CON03 CONF Hourly 39.28 41.27 43.35 45.48 47.77 Bi-Weekly 3,142.40 3,301.60 3,468.00 3,638.40 3,821.60 Monthly 6,808.53 7,153.47 7,514.00 7,883.20 8,280.13 Annual 81,702.40 85,841.60 90,168.00 94,598.40 99,361.60 3401 OFFICE SPECIALIST CME36 CMEA Hourly 41.93 44.03 46.24 48.55 50.96 Bi-Weekly 3,354.40 3,522.40 3,699.20 3,884.00 4,076.80 Monthly 7,267.87 7,631.87 8,014.93 8,415.33 8,833.07 Annual 87,214.40 91,582.40 96,179.20 100,984.00 105,996.80 3403 OFFICE SPECIALIST (PPT) CME45 CMEA Hourly 41.93 44.03 46.24 48.55 50.96 Bi-Weekly 3,354.40 3,522.40 3,699.20 3,884.00 4,076.80 Monthly 7,267.87 7,631.87 8,014.93 8,415.33 8,833.07 Annual 87,214.40 91,582.40 96,179.20 100,984.00 105,996.80 4300 PARK MNT LEAD WKR MIL08 CARP Hourly 41.84 43.94 46.11 48.44 50.86 Bi-Weekly 3,347.20 3,515.20 3,688.80 3,875.20 4,068.80 Monthly 7,252.27 7,616.27 7,992.40 8,396.27 8,815.73 Annual 87,027.20 91,395.20 95,908.80 100,755.20 105,788.80 1265 PARK MNT SPVSR MGR20 MGMT Hourly 64.71 67.98 71.36 74.95 78.70 Bi-Weekly 5,176.80 5,438.40 5,708.80 5,996.00 6,296.00 Monthly 11,216.40 11,783.20 12,369.07 12,991.33 13,641.33 Annual 134,596.80 141,398.40 148,428.80 155,896.00 163,696.00 2315 PAYROLL/ACCOUNTING TECH (CONF) CON01 CONF Hourly 46.80 49.12 51.62 54.20 56.89 Bi-Weekly 3,744.00 3,929.60 4,129.60 4,336.00 4,551.20 Monthly 8,112.00 8,514.13 8,947.47 9,394.67 9,860.93 Annual 97,344.00 102,169.60 107,369.60 112,736.00 118,331.20 3402 PERMIT TECH CME37 CMEA Hourly 42.92 45.07 47.34 49.69 52.17 Bi-Weekly 3,433.60 3,605.60 3,787.20 3,975.20 4,173.60 Monthly 7,439.47 7,812.13 8,205.60 8,612.93 9,042.80 Annual 89,273.60 93,745.60 98,467.20 103,355.20 108,513.60 3405 PLAN CHECK EXAMINER CME56 CMEA Hourly 57.81 60.86 64.07 67.43 70.99 Bi-Weekly 4,624.80 4,868.80 5,125.60 5,394.40 5,679.20 Monthly 10,020.40 10,549.07 11,105.47 11,687.87 12,304.93 Annual 120,244.80 126,588.80 133,265.60 140,254.40 147,659.20 1172 PLANNING MANAGER MGR16 MGMT Hourly 78.48 82.40 86.53 90.86 95.38 Bi-Weekly 6,278.40 6,592.00 6,922.40 7,268.80 7,630.40 Monthly 13,603.20 14,282.67 14,998.53 15,749.07 16,532.53 Annual 163,238.40 171,392.00 179,982.40 188,988.80 198,390.40 3404 PLANNING TECHNICIAN CME52 CMEA Hourly 43.88 46.06 48.38 50.80 53.32 Bi-Weekly 3,510.40 3,684.80 3,870.40 4,064.00 4,265.60 Monthly 7,605.87 7,983.73 8,385.87 8,805.33 9,242.13 Annual 91,270.40 95,804.80 100,630.40 105,664.00 110,905.60 6165 POLICE AGENT CPO02 CPOA Hourly 66.71 70.01 73.53 77.20 81.07 Bi-Weekly 5,336.80 5,600.80 5,882.40 6,176.00 6,485.60 Monthly 11,563.07 12,135.07 12,745.20 13,381.33 14,052.13 Annual 138,756.80 145,620.80 152,942.40 160,576.00 168,625.60 [Page]6

18.a
Packet Pg. 252
Attachment: Resolution - Amending Classification and Salary Schedule for Market Adjustments (Market Adjustments for Specified Effective: 07/08/2024

CLASS CD JOB TITLE
Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5

CITY OF CAMPBELL

POSITION CLASSIFICATION - ALL GROUPS
FY 24/25- SALARY SCHEDULE

STEP RANGES
Range
1045 POLICE CAPTAIN MGR01 MGMT Hourly 109.90 115.43 121.16 127.29 133.60 Bi-Weekly 8,792.00 9,234.40 9,692.80 10,183.20 10,688.00 Monthly 19,049.33 20,007.87 21,001.07 22,063.60 23,157.33 Annual 228,592.00 240,094.40 252,012.80 264,763.20 277,888.00 1010 POLICE CHIEF UNC02 UNCL - P Hourly 120.89 - - - 146.96 Bi-Weekly 9,671.20 -
-
-
11,756.80
Monthly 20,954.27 -
-
-
25,473.07
Annual 251,451.20 -
-
-
305,676.80
1075 POLICE LT MGR03 MGMT Hourly 79.69 83.65 87.86 92.24 96.86 Bi-Weekly 6,375.20 6,692.00 7,028.80 7,379.20 7,748.80 Monthly 13,812.93 14,499.33 15,229.07 15,988.27 16,789.07 Annual 165,755.20 173,992.00 182,748.80 191,859.20 201,468.80 6215 POLICE OFCR CPO04 CPOA Hourly 62.10 65.18 68.43 71.86 75.45 Bi-Weekly 4,968.00 5,214.40 5,474.40 5,748.80 6,036.00 Monthly 10,764.00 11,297.87 11,861.20 12,455.73 13,078.00 Annual 129,168.00 135,574.40 142,334.40 149,468.80 156,936.00 6214 POLICE OFCR TRN CPO03 CPOA Hourly 55.90 - -
-
-
B
i-Weekly 4,472.00 -
-
-
-
M
onthly 9,689.33 -
-
-
-
A
nnual 116,272.00 -
-
-
-
5360 P
OLICE RCDS SPEC CPC05 CPCEA Hourly 39.52 41.49 43.60 45.78 48.03 Bi-Weekly 3,161.60 3,319.20 3,488.00 3,662.40 3,842.40 Monthly 6,850.13 7,191.60 7,557.33 7,935.20 8,325.20 Annual 82,201.60 86,299.20 90,688.00 95,222.40 99,902.40 5292 POLICE RCDS SPVSR CPC04 CPCEA Hourly 50.34 52.81 55.47 58.22 61.12 Bi-Weekly 4,027.20 4,224.80 4,437.60 4,657.60 4,889.60 Monthly 8,725.60 9,153.73 9,614.80 10,091.47 10,594.13 Annual 104,707.20 109,844.80 115,377.60 121,097.60 127,129.60 6120 POLICE SGT CPO01 CPOA Hourly 74.18 77.93 81.78 85.85 90.17 Bi-Weekly 5,934.40 6,234.40 6,542.40 6,868.00 7,213.60 Monthly 12,857.87 13,507.87 14,175.20 14,880.67 15,629.47 Annual 154,294.40 162,094.40 170,102.40 178,568.00 187,553.60 1175 PRINCIPAL PLANNER MGR30 MGMT Hourly 76.36 80.15 84.24 88.39 92.89 Bi-Weekly 6,108.80 6,412.00 6,739.20 7,071.20 7,431.20 Monthly 13,235.73 13,892.67 14,601.60 15,320.93 16,100.93 Annual 158,828.80 166,712.00 175,219.20 183,851.20 193,211.20 5361 PROPERTY/EVIDENCE SPEC CPC06 CPCEA Hourly 43.27 45.46 47.73 50.11 52.63 Bi-Weekly 3,461.60 3,636.80 3,818.40 4,008.80 4,210.40 Monthly 7,500.13 7,879.73 8,273.20 8,685.73 9,122.53 Annual 90,001.60 94,556.80 99,278.40 104,228.80 109,470.40 5275 PS DISPATCHER CPC02 CPCEA Hourly 52.17 54.79 57.50 60.41 63.42 Bi-Weekly 4,173.60 4,383.20 4,600.00 4,832.80 5,073.60 Monthly 9,042.80 9,496.93 9,966.67 10,471.07 10,992.80 Annual 108,513.60 113,963.20 119,600.00 125,652.80 131,913.60 5276 PS DISPATCHER (PPT) CPC03 CPCEA Hourly 52.17 54.79 57.50 60.41 63.42 Bi-Weekly 4,173.60 4,383.20 4,600.00 4,832.80 5,073.60 Monthly 9,042.80 9,496.93 9,966.67 10,471.07 10,992.80 Annual 108,513.60 113,963.20 119,600.00 125,652.80 131,913.60 3120 PUBLIC SAFETY SYS SPEC CME01 CMEA Hourly 57.08 59.96 62.95 66.11 69.39 Bi-Weekly 4,566.40 4,796.80 5,036.00 5,288.80 5,551.20 Monthly 9,893.87 10,393.07 10,911.33 11,459.07 12,027.60 Annual 118,726.40 124,716.80 130,936.00 137,508.80 144,331.20 1095 PUBLIC WKS SUPT MGR08 MGMT Hourly 82.54 86.68 91.01 95.56 100.33 Bi-Weekly 6,603.20 6,934.40 7,280.80 7,644.80 8,026.40 Monthly 14,306.93 15,024.53 15,775.07 16,563.73 17,390.53 Annual 171,683.20 180,294.40 189,300.80 198,764.80 208,686.40 [Page]7

18.a
Packet Pg. 253
Attachment: Resolution - Amending Classification and Salary Schedule for Market Adjustments (Market Adjustments for Specified Effective: 07/08/2024

CLASS CD JOB TITLE
Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5

CITY OF CAMPBELL

POSITION CLASSIFICATION - ALL GROUPS
FY 24/25- SALARY SCHEDULE

STEP RANGES
Range
1015 PUBLIC WORK DIRECTOR UNC03 UNCL Hourly 109.40 - - - 143.72 Bi-Weekly 8,752.00 -
-
-
11,497.60
Monthly 18,962.67 -
-
-
24,911.47
Annual 227,552.00 -
-
-
298,937.60
3155 PUBLIC WORKS INSP CME08 CMEA Hourly 59.28 62.23 65.35 68.62 72.08 Bi-Weekly 4,742.40 4,978.40 5,228.00 5,489.60 5,766.40 Monthly 10,275.20 10,786.53 11,327.33 11,894.13 12,493.87 Annual 123,302.40 129,438.40 135,928.00 142,729.60 149,926.40 3365 REC PROG COORD CME29 CMEA Hourly 46.43 48.80 51.17 53.74 56.43 Bi-Weekly 3,714.40 3,904.00 4,093.60 4,299.20 4,514.40 Monthly 8,047.87 8,458.67 8,869.47 9,314.93 9,781.20 Annual 96,574.40 101,504.00 106,433.60 111,779.20 117,374.40 1035 REC/COMM. SVCS DIRECTOR UNC04 UNCL Hourly 107.57 - -
-
140.68
Bi-Weekly 8,605.60 -
-
-
11,254.40
Monthly 18,645.47 -
-
-
24,384.53
Annual 223,745.60 -
- - 292,614.40
1171 RECREATION SERVICE MGR MGR22 MGMT Hourly 76.50 80.37 84.38 88.58 93.02 Bi-Weekly 6,120.00 6,429.60 6,750.40 7,086.40 7,441.60 Monthly 13,260.00 13,930.80 14,625.87 15,353.87 16,123.47 Annual 159,120.00 167,169.60 175,510.40 184,246.40 193,481.60 3362 RECREATION SPECIALIST FACILITIES CME47 CMEA Hourly 31.88 34.08 36.37 38.84 41.47 Bi-Weekly 2,550.40 2,726.40 2,909.60 3,107.20 3,317.60 Monthly 5,525.87 5,907.20 6,304.13 6,732.27 7,188.13 Annual 66,310.40 70,886.40 75,649.60 80,787.20 86,257.60 3364 RECREATION SPECIALIST CME47 CMEA Hourly 31.88 34.08 36.37 38.84 41.47 Bi-Weekly 2,550.40 2,726.40 2,909.60 3,107.20 3,317.60 Monthly 5,525.87 5,907.20 6,304.13 6,732.27 7,188.13 Annual 66,310.40 70,886.40 75,649.60 80,787.20 86,257.60 3363 RECREATION SPECIALIST (PPT) CME51 CMEA Hourly 31.88 34.08 36.37 38.84 41.47 Bi-Weekly 2,550.40 2,726.40 2,909.60 3,107.20 3,317.60 Monthly 5,525.87 5,907.20 6,304.13 6,732.27 7,188.13 Annual 66,310.40 70,886.40 75,649.60 80,787.20 86,257.60 3255 RECREATION SPVSR CME20 CMEA Hourly 57.25 60.11 63.13 66.32 69.63 Bi-Weekly 4,580.00 4,808.80 5,050.40 5,305.60 5,570.40 Monthly 9,923.33 10,419.07 10,942.53 11,495.47 12,069.20 Annual 119,080.00 125,028.80 131,310.40 137,945.60 144,830.40 3193 REDEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR CME17 CMEA -
-
-
-
-
3192 SEN
IOR PLANNER CME16 CMEA Hourly 71.04 74.56 78.36 82.22 86.41 Bi-Weekly 5,683.20 5,964.80 6,268.80 6,577.60 6,912.80 Monthly 12,313.60 12,923.73 13,582.40 14,251.47 14,977.73 Annual 147,763.20 155,084.80 162,988.80 171,017.60 179,732.80 3178 SOCIAL MEDIA SPECIALIST (PPT) CME50 CMEA Hourly 39.53 41.53 43.61 45.78 48.08 Bi-Weekly 3,162.40 3,322.40 3,488.80 3,662.40 3,846.40 Monthly 6,851.87 7,198.53 7,559.07 7,935.20 8,333.87 Annual 82,222.40 86,382.40 90,708.80 95,222.40 100,006.40 3179 SR ACCOUNTANT CME49 CMEA Hourly 58.93 61.90 64.97 68.22 71.66 Bi-Weekly 4,714.40 4,952.00 5,197.60 5,457.60 5,732.80 Monthly 10,214.53 10,729.33 11,261.47 11,824.80 12,421.07 Annual 122,574.40 128,752.00 135,137.60 141,897.60 149,052.80 3145 SR BLDG INSP CME05 CMEA Hourly 64.39 67.69 71.05 74.62 78.35 Bi-Weekly 5,151.20 5,415.20 5,684.00 5,969.60 6,268.00 Monthly 11,160.93 11,732.93 12,315.33 12,934.13 13,580.67 Annual 133,931.20 140,795.20 147,784.00 155,209.60 162,968.00 [Page]8

18.a
Packet Pg. 254
Attachment: Resolution - Amending Classification and Salary Schedule for Market Adjustments (Market Adjustments for Specified Effective: 07/08/2024

CLASS CD JOB TITLE
Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5

CITY OF CAMPBELL

POSITION CLASSIFICATION - ALL GROUPS
FY 24/25- SALARY SCHEDULE

STEP RANGES
Range
1093 SR CIVIL ENG (PPT) MGR07 MGMT Hourly 78.76 82.72 86.87 91.17 95.75 Bi-Weekly 6,300.80 6,617.60 6,949.60 7,293.60 7,660.00 Monthly 13,651.73 14,338.13 15,057.47 15,802.80 16,596.67 Annual 163,820.80 172,057.60 180,689.60 189,633.60 199,160.00 1091 SR CIVIL ENGR MGR06 MGMT Hourly 78.76 82.72 86.87 91.17 95.75 Bi-Weekly 6,300.80 6,617.60 6,949.60 7,293.60 7,660.00 Monthly 13,651.73 14,338.13 15,057.47 15,802.80 16,596.67 Annual 163,820.80 172,057.60 180,689.60 189,633.60 199,160.00 3191 SR ENGR TECH CME15 CMEA Hourly 63.90 67.11 70.46 74.00 77.68 Bi-Weekly 5,112.00 5,368.80 5,636.80 5,920.00 6,214.40 Monthly 11,076.00 11,632.40 12,213.07 12,826.67 13,464.53 Annual 132,912.00 139,588.80 146,556.80 153,920.00 161,574.40 3367 SR MUSEUM SPECIALIST CME31 CMEA Hourly 47.98 50.40 52.90 55.53 58.38 Bi-Weekly 3,838.40 4,032.00 4,232.00 4,442.40 4,670.40 Monthly 8,316.53 8,736.00 9,169.33 9,625.20 10,119.20 Annual 99,798.40 104,832.00 110,032.00 115,502.40 121,430.40 3370 SR OFFICE ASST CME32 CMEA Hourly 40.44 42.44 44.58 46.79 49.18 Bi-Weekly 3,235.20 3,395.20 3,566.40 3,743.20 3,934.40 Monthly 7,009.60 7,356.27 7,727.20 8,110.27 8,524.53 Annual 84,115.20 88,275.20 92,726.40 97,323.20 102,294.40 3160 SR PUBLIC WORKS INSP CME09 CMEA Hourly 63.31 66.50 69.83 73.33 77.00 Bi-Weekly 5,064.80 5,320.00 5,586.40 5,866.40 6,160.00 Monthly 10,973.73 11,526.67 12,103.87 12,710.53 13,346.67 Annual 131,684.80 138,320.00 145,246.40 152,526.40 160,160.00 1267 SR PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT MGR MGR26 MGMT Hourly 78.76 82.72 86.87 91.17 95.75 Bi-Weekly 6,300.80 6,617.60 6,949.60 7,293.60 7,660.00 Monthly 13,651.73 14,338.13 15,057.47 15,802.80 16,596.67 Annual 163,820.80 172,057.60 180,689.60 189,633.60 199,160.00 3250 SR SVCS SPVSR CME19 CMEA Hourly 57.25 60.11 63.13 66.32 69.63 Bi-Weekly 4,580.00 4,808.80 5,050.40 5,305.60 5,570.40 Monthly 9,923.33 10,419.07 10,942.53 11,495.47 12,069.20 Annual 119,080.00 125,028.80 131,310.40 137,945.60 144,830.40 4296 STR MNT FIELD SPVSR MIL07 CARP Hourly 54.68 57.39 60.27 63.28 66.48 Bi-Weekly 4,374.40 4,591.20 4,821.60 5,062.40 5,318.40 Monthly 9,477.87 9,947.60 10,446.80 10,968.53 11,523.20 Annual 113,734.40 119,371.20 125,361.60 131,622.40 138,278.40 4295 STR MNT LEAD WKR MIL06 CARP Hourly 41.84 43.94 46.11 48.44 50.86 Bi-Weekly 3,347.20 3,515.20 3,688.80 3,875.20 4,068.80 Monthly 7,252.27 7,616.27 7,992.40 8,396.27 8,815.73 Annual 87,027.20 91,395.20 95,908.80 100,755.20 105,788.80 1266 STREET MNT SUPERVISOR MGR25 MGMT Hourly 63.01 66.16 69.46 72.94 76.59 Bi-Weekly 5,040.80 5,292.80 5,556.80 5,835.20 6,127.20 Monthly 10,921.73 11,467.73 12,039.73 12,642.93 13,275.60 Annual 131,060.80 137,612.80 144,476.80 151,715.20 159,307.20 1046 SUPPORT SERVICE MANAGER MGR21 MGMT Hourly 85.89 90.21 94.76 99.48 104.47 Bi-Weekly 6,871.20 7,216.80 7,580.80 7,958.40 8,357.60 Monthly 14,887.60 15,636.40 16,425.07 17,243.20 18,108.13 Annual 178,651.20 187,636.80 197,100.80 206,918.40 217,297.60 1090 TRAFFIC ENGR MGR05 MGMT Hourly 81.27 85.36 89.61 94.09 98.82 Bi-Weekly 6,501.60 6,828.80 7,168.80 7,527.20 7,905.60 Monthly 14,086.80 14,795.73 15,532.40 16,308.93 17,128.80 Annual 169,041.60 177,548.80 186,388.80 195,707.20 205,545.60 3916 UNHOUSED SPECIALIST CME42 CMEA Hourly 42.25 44.47 46.81 49.28 51.87 Bi-Weekly 3,380.00 3,557.60 3,744.80 3,942.40 4,149.60 Monthly 7,323.33 7,708.13 8,113.73 8,541.87 8,990.80 Annual 87,880.00 92,497.60 97,364.80 102,502.40 107,889.60 [Page]9

18.a
Packet Pg. 255
Attachment: Resolution - Amending Classification and Salary Schedule for Market Adjustments (Market Adjustments for Specified Effective: 07/08/2024

CLASS CD JOB TITLE
Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5

CITY OF CAMPBELL

POSITION CLASSIFICATION - ALL GROUPS
FY 24/25- SALARY SCHEDULE

STEP RANGES
Range
3395 UTILITY WRKR CME34 CMEA Hourly 40.78 42.84 44.95 47.19 49.59 Bi-Weekly 3,262.40 3,427.20 3,596.00 3,775.20 3,967.20 Monthly 7,068.53 7,425.60 7,791.33 8,179.60 8,595.60 Annual 84,822.40 89,107.20 93,496.00 98,155.20 103,147.20 Notes:
1) Negotiated 3% Cost of Living Adjustments for CMEA, CARP, Confidential, CPCEA, MGMT, and UNCLASSIFIED eff 07/08/2024. 2) Market rate adjustment for Dispatcher (0.72%) effective 09/02/2024. 3) Market rate adjustment for Lighting & Traffic Signal Tech (5.46%) effective 07/08/2024. 4) Market rate adjustment for Maintenance Worker II (0.11%) effective 07/08/2024. 5) Added Economic Development Manager position effective 12/03/2024. [Page]10

18.a
Packet Pg. 256
Attachment: Resolution - Amending Classification and Salary Schedule for Market Adjustments (Market Adjustments for Specified

City
Council
Report

TITLE: Authorizing the City to Apply to and Participate in the State of California's Prohousing Designation Program (Resolution/Roll Call Vote)

RECOMMENDED ACTION

That the City Council adopt a Resolution, authorizing application to, and participation in, the State’s Prohousing Designation Program (PDP).

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
California’s Prohousing Designation Program (PDP) is a key initiative under the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) that encourages cities to adopt policies and practices that accelerate housing production through various financial incentives.

Local governments that receive the Prohousing Designation can receive priority processing or higher ranking when applying for certain housing related grants.

BACKGROUND
On April 18, 2023, the City adopted its 2023 -2031 Housing Element which established ambitious goals, policies, and programs for supporting housing needs in Campbell. As one of the first jurisdictions in Santa Clara County to receive certification of its Housing Element, and in acknowledgement of policies and programs included in the Housing Element itself, the City was recommended by HCD staff to apply for a Prohousing Designation.

DISCUSSION
Pursuing the Prohousing Designation would further the City’s commitment to implementing the 2023-2031 Housing Element and does not require the adoption of new policies or programs. Securing the designation would not only recognize Campbell’s leadership in addressing housing challenges but also increase the City’s chances in obtaining funding to support local housing and infrastructure projects.

To qualify for a Prohousing Designation, jurisdictions must:

1. Meet specific eligibility criteria (e.g., adopt a compliant Housing Element, complete any required rezoning to meet statutory requirements for the current Item: 19
Category: NEW BUSINESS
Meeting Date: December 3, 2024
19 Packet Pg. 257
Prohousing Designation Page 2 of 4
planning period, and demonstrate treatment of unhoused individuals comply with constitutional rights and identified best practices1);

2. Engage in a diligent public participation process (see Attachment E – Public Engagement Process);

3. Demonstrate progress in areas such as zoning for higher -density development, streamlining permit processes, and removing barriers to affordable housing construction; and

4. Receive at least 30 points on the Prohousing Designation Application scoring sheet (Appendix 3) for policies already enacted or proposed to be implemented in the next two years.

Responsive to these requirements, the City has prepared a Draft Application which, based on initial feedback from HCD staff, meets the minimum eligibility criteria, and may achieve a score of up to 60 points. The City’s estimated points, if granted, would maximize potential benefits of obtaining certain funding sources, such as the Prohousing Incentive Program (see “Fiscal Impacts”), which cap possible benefits at 50 points.

The City’s Housing p olicies and programs highlighted in the application that are in alignment with the objectives of the PDP, include, but are not limited to:

• Designating housing opportunity sites that demonstrate a housing capacity of 178% of the City’s assigned RHNA (Regional Housing Needs Allocation) that were strategically selected to ensure the efficient use of land, promotion of access to public transportation, and avoiding hazardous areas (i.e., fire hazard areas).

• Establishing a ministerial review and approval process for qualifying housing development projects, and either reducing or eliminating the number of public hearings required for all other housing development projects.

• Establishing an Affordable Housing (AH) Overlay zone which provides for expedited permit processing, relaxed development standards, and reduction of park in-lieu fees as incentives for deeply affordable housing projects.

• Establishing a Commercial Linkage Fee and allocating ARPA funds to support housing, including the production and preservation of affordable housing and unhoused programs.

FISCAL IMPACTS

1 A table summarizing how local practices comply is provided as a dedicated attachment (reference Attachment F – Best Practices for the Treatment of Unhoused Individuals). 19 Packet Pg. 258
Prohousing Designation Page 3 of 4
There is no immediate fiscal impact associated with applying to the Prohousing Designation Program (PDP). If awarded the designation, the City may gain access to additional funding opportunities including, but not limited to, the following:
• Prohousing Incentive Program (PIP)
• Affordable Housing & Sustainable Communities (AHSC)
• Infill Infrastructure Grant (IIG)
• Transformative Climate Communities (TCC)
• Solutions for Congested Corridors
• Local Partnership Program
• Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program (TIRCP)
If the City is able to obtain the Prohousing designation soon, it may be eligible for upcoming funding programs like AHSC, which has an application deadline of March 19, 2024.

NEXT STEPS
Once authorized by Council, the City’s Prohousing Designation Application will be circulated for public comment for 30-days. During this time, stakeholders, residents, and other interested parties can provide feedback or raise concerns about the application.

After formally submitting, HCD shall complete its review within 60 calendar days. Upon receiving a Prohousing Designation from HCD, staff will share the outcome and point score with the City Council and make the information publicly available on the pro ject website.

ALTERNATIVES

1. Decline authorization for the Prohousing Designation Program (PDP). This option is not recommended by staff, as it would result in the City forfeiting the opportunity to participate in upcoming rounds of grant funding opportunities.

2. Request revisions to the Draft PDP prior to submission to HCD. Staff would recommend this option if deficiencies are identified, or the application could otherwise be improved.

Prepared by:

Stephen Rose, Senior Planner
19 Packet Pg. 259

Prohousing Designation Page 4 of 4
Reviewed by:

Rob Eastwood, Community
Development Director
Approved by:

Brian Loventhal, City Manager
Attachment:
a. Draft Resolution
b. Draft Prohousing Designation Application
c. Public Participation Process
d. Best Practices for the Treatment of Unhoused Individuals 19 Packet Pg. 260
RESOLUTION NO.

BEING A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CAMPBELL

AUTHORIZING APPLICATION TO AND PARTICIPATION IN THE PROHOUSING

DESIGNATION PROGRAM
WHEREAS, Government Code section 65589.9 established the Prohousing Designation Program (“Program”), which creates incentives for jurisdictions that are compliant with state housing element requirements and that have enacted Prohousing local policies; and
WHEREAS, such jurisdictions will be designated Prohousing, and, as such, will receive additional points or other preference during the scoring of their competitive Applications for specified housing and infrastructure funding; and
WHEREAS, the California Department of Housing and Community Development (“Department”) has adopted regulations (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 25, § 6600 et seq.) to implement the Program (“Program Regulations”), as authorized by Government Code section 65589.9, subdivision (d); and
WHEREAS, the City of Campbell (“Applicant”) desires to submit an Application for a Prohousing Designation (“Application”).

THEREFORE, BE IT IS RESOLVED THAT:

1. Applicant is hereby authorized and directed to submit an Application to the Department.

2. Applicant acknowledges and confirms that it is currently in compliance with applicable state housing law.

3. Applicant acknowledges and confirms that it will continue to comply with applicable housing laws and to refrain from enacting laws, developing policies, or taking other local governmental actions that may or do inhibit or constrain housing production.

Examples of such local laws, policies, and actions include moratoriums on development; local voter approval requirements related to housing production; downzoning; and unduly restrictive or onerous zoning regulations, development standards, or permit procedures. Applicant further acknowledges and confirms that the Prohousing Policies in its Application comply with its duty to Affirmatively Further Fair Housing pursuant to Government Code sections 8899.50 and 65583. Applicant further acknowledges and confirms that its general plan is in alignment with an adopted sustainable communities strategy pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21155- 21155.4. Applicant further acknowledges and confirms that its policies for the treatment of homeless encampments on public property comply with and will continue to comply with the Constitution and that it has enacted best practices in its jurisdiction that are consistent with the United States Interagency Council on Homelessness’ “7 Principles for Addressing Encampments” (June 17, 2022, update).

19.a
Packet Pg. 261
Attachment: Draft Resolution (Prohousing Designation)

4. If the Application is approved, Applicant is hereby authorized and directed to enter into, execute, and deliver all documents required or deemed necessary or appropriate to participate in the Program, and all amendments thereto (the “Program Documents”).

5. Applicant acknowledges and agrees that it shall be subject to the Application; the terms and conditions specified in the Program Documents; the Program Regulations; and any and all other applicable law.

6. The Community Development Director is authorized to execute and deliver the Application and the Program Documents on behalf of the Applicant for participation in the Program.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this______________ day of______________ , 2024, by the following roll call vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:

APPROVED: ____________________________
Susan M. Landry, Mayor

ATTEST: ____________________________
Andrea Sanders, City Clerk

19.a
Packet Pg. 262
Attachment: Draft Resolution (Prohousing Designation)
Prohousing Designation Program Application

State of California
Governor Gavin Newsom

Melinda Grant, Undersecretary
Business, Consumer Services and Housing Agency

Gustavo Velasquez, Director
Department of Housing and Community Development

Megan Kirkeby, Deputy Director
Division of Housing Policy Development

2020 West El Camino, Suite 500
Sacramento, CA 95833

Website: https://www.hcd.ca.gov/community-development/prohousing Email: [email protected]

January 2024

19.b
Packet Pg. 263
Attachment: Draft Prohousing Designation Application (Prohousing Designation) Prohousing Designation Program Application Package
Instructions

The applicant is applying for a Prohousing Designation under the Prohousing Designation Program (“Prohousing” or “Program”), which is administered by the Department of Housing and Community Development (“Department”) pursuant to Government Code section 65589.9.

The Program creates incentives for Jurisdictions that are compliant with State Housing Element Law and that have enacted Prohousing Policies. These incentives will take the form of additional points or other preference in the scoring of applications for competitive housing and infrastructure programs. The administrators of each such program will determine the value and form of the preference.

In order to be considered for a Prohousing Designation, the applicant must accurately complete all sections of this application, including any relevant appendices. The Department reserves the right to request additional clarifying information from the applicant.

This application is subject to Government Code section 65589.9 and to the regulations (Cal.

Code Regs., tit. 25, § 6600 et seq.) adopted by the Department in promulgation thereof (“Regulations”). All capitalized terms in this application shall have the meanings set forth in the Regulations.

All applicants must submit a complete, signed application package to the Department, in electronic format, in order to be considered for a Prohousing Designation. Please direct electronic copies of the completed application package to the following email address:

[email protected]
.

A complete application will include all items identified in the Application Checklist.

In relation to Appendix 1, the Formal Resolution for the Prohousing Designation Program, please use strikethrough and underline if proposing any modifications to the text of the Resolution. Please be aware, any sustentative deviations from the Formal Resolution may result in an incomplete application and will likely be subject to additional internal review and potential delays.

Appendix 2, the Proposed Policy Completion Schedule, applies only if an application includes proposed policies.

Appendix 3, Project Proposal Scoring Sheet and Sample Project Proposal Scoring Sheet, includes a blank template to be completed by the applicant as part of the application, as well as a Sample Project Proposal Scoring Sheet with an example of how this template may be completed.

Appendix 4 lists examples of Prohousing Policies with enhancement factors to aid applicants in understanding how enhancement factors may be applied.

Appendix 5 is where the applicant will include any additional information and supporting documentation for the application.

19.b
Packet Pg. 264
Attachment: Draft Prohousing Designation Application (Prohousing Designation) If you have questions regarding this application or the Program, or if you require technical assistance in preparing this application, please email [email protected].

19.b
Packet Pg. 265
Attachment: Draft Prohousing Designation Application (Prohousing Designation) Application Checklist

Yes No
Application Information ☒ ☐
Certification and Acknowledgement ☒ ☐
The Legislative Information form is completed. ☒ ☐
The Threshold Requirements Checklist is completed. ☒ ☐ A duly adopted and certified Formal Resolution for the Prohousing Designation Program is included in the application package. (See Appendix 1 for the Formal Resolution for the Prohousing Designation Program form.) [Action Pending]
☐ ☐
If applicable, the Proposed Policy Completion Schedule is completed. (See Appendix 2.)
☒ ☐
The Project Proposal Scoring Sheet is completed. (See Appendix 3 for the Project Proposal Scoring Sheet and the Sample Project Proposal Scoring Sheet.)
☒ ☐
Additional information and supporting documentation (Applicant to provide as Appendix 5)
☒ ☐

Application Information

Applicant (Jurisdiction): City of Campbell
Applicant Mailing Address: 70 N. First Steet
City: Campbell
ZIP Code: 95008
Website: https://www.campbellca.gov/
Authorized Representative Name Rob Eastwood [Designation Pending] Authorized Representative Title: Community Development Director Phone: (408) 866-2141
Email: [email protected]
Contact Person Name: Stephen Rose
Contact Person Title: Senior Planner
Phone: (408) 866-2142
Email: [email protected]
Proposed Total Score (Based on
Appendix 3):
60 19.b
Packet Pg. 266
Attachment: Draft Prohousing Designation Application (Prohousing Designation)

CERTIFICATION AND ACKNOWLEDGMENT

As authorized by the Formal Resolution for the Prohousing Designation Program (Resolution No. ) , which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference as if set forth in full, I hereby submit this full and complete application on behalf of the applicant.

I certify that all information and representations set forth in this application are true and correct.

I further certify that any proposed Prohousing Policy identified herein will be enacted within two (2) years of the date of this application submittal.

I acknowledge that this application constitutes a public record under the California Public Records Act (Gov. Code, § 6250 et seq.) and is therefore subject to public disclosure by the Department.

Signature: __________________________________________

Name and Title: Rob Eastwood, Community Development Director

Date: _______________________________________________

Legislative Information

District Number Legislators Name(s)

State
Assembly
District

23 Assemblymember Marc Berman

State
Senate
District

15 Senator Dave Cortese

Applicants can find their respective State Senate representatives at https://www.senate.ca.gov/
, and their respective State Assembly representatives at https://www.assembly.ca.gov/

19.b
Packet Pg. 267
Attachment: Draft Prohousing Designation Application (Prohousing Designation) Threshold Requirements Checklist

The applicant meets the following threshold requirements in accordance with Section 6604 of the Regulations:

Yes No
The applicant is a Jurisdiction. ☒ ☐
The applicant has adopted a Compliant Housing Element. ☒ ☐ The applicant has submitted or will submit a legally sufficient Annual Progress Report prior to designation.
☒ ☐
The applicant has completed or agrees to complete, on or before the relevant statutory deadlines, any rezone program or zoning that is necessary to remain in compliance with Government Code sections 65583, subdivision (c)(1), and 65584.09, subdivision (a), and with California Coastal Commission certification where appropriate. ☒ ☐
The applicant is in compliance, at the time of the application, with applicable state housing law, including, but not limited to those included in Government Section 65585, subdivision (j); laws relating to the imposition of school facilities fees or other requirements (Gov. Code, § 65995 et seq.); Least Cost Zoning Law (Gov. Code, § 65913.1); Permit Streamlining Act (Gov. Code, § 65920 et seq.); and provisions relating to timeliness of CEQA processing by local governments in Public Resources Code sections 21080.1, 21080.2, and 21151.5(a). ☒ ☐
The applicant further acknowledges and confirms that its treatment of homeless encampments on public property complies with and will continue to comply with the constitutional rights of persons experiencing homelessness and that it has submitted a one-page summary to the Department demonstrating how the applicant has enacted best practices in their jurisdiction related to the treatment of unhoused individuals camping on public property, consistent with United States Interagency Council on Homelessness’ “7 Principles for Addressing Encampments,” (June 17, 2022 update), hereby incorporated by reference. [Materials to be included with City Council Report]
☐ ☐
The applicant has duly adopted and certified, by the applicant’s governing body, a Formal Resolution for the Prohousing Designation Program, which is hereby incorporated by reference. (A true and correct copy of the resolution is included in this application package.) ☐ ☐
The applicant has demonstrated that they engaged in a diligent public participation process that included 1) outreach through a variety of methods and languages; 2) specific efforts to engage all segments of the community, including individuals or representatives of lower-income and special needs households, for-profit and non-profit developers and special needs service providers; 3) availability of the draft document to the public, including notification to interested parties and all segments of the community for 30 days and subsequent versions for 7 days; 4) public hearings and informative meetings; and 5) consideration of comments, including incorporation of comments into a jurisdiction’s ☐ ☐

19.b
Packet Pg. 268
Attachment: Draft Prohousing Designation Application (Prohousing Designation) application and Prohousing Policies, as appropriate. The applicant has submitted documentation of comments received during this process.

Project Proposal
Category 1: Favorable Zoning and Land Use

Category Prohousing Policy Description Points
1A Sufficient sites, including rezoning, to accommodate 150 percent or greater of the current or draft RHNA, whichever is greater, by total and income category. These additional sites must be identified in the Jurisdiction’s housing element adequate sites inventory, consistent with Government Code section 65583, subdivisions (a)(3) and (c)(1). 3 1B Permitting missing middle housing uses (e.g., duplexes, triplexes, and fourplexes) by right in existing low-density, single-family residential zones in a manner that exceeds the requirements of SB 9 (Chapter 162, Statutes of 2021, Gov. Code, §§ 65852.21, 66411.7). 3 1C Sufficient sites, including rezoning, to accommodate 125 to 149 percent of the current or draft RHNA, whichever is greater, by total and income category. These points shall not be awarded if the applicant earns three points pursuant to Category (1)(A) above. These additional sites must be identified in the Jurisdiction’s housing element adequate sites inventory, consistent with Government Code section 65583, subdivisions (a)(3) and (c)(1).
2 1D Density bonus programs that allow additional density for additional affordability beyond minimum statutory requirements (Gov. Code, § 65915 et seq.).
2 1E Increasing allowable density in low-density, single-family residential areas beyond the requirements of state Accessory Dwelling Unit Law, (Gov. Code, §§ 65852.2, 65852.22) (e.g., permitting more than one converted ADU; one detached, new construction ADU; and one JADU per single-family lot), and in a manner that exceeds the requirements of SB 9 (Chapter 192, Statutes of 2021, Gov. Code, §§ 65852.21, 66411.7). These policies shall be separate from any qualifying policies under Category (1)(B).
2 1F Eliminating minimum parking requirements for residential development as authorized by Government Code section 65852.2; adopting vehicular parking ratios that are less than the relevant ratio thresholds at subparagraphs (A), (B), and (C) of Gov. Code section 65915, subdivision (p)(1); or adopting maximum parking requirements at or less than ratios pursuant to Gov. Code section 65915, subdivision (p).
2 1G Zoning or incentives that are designed to increase affordable housing development in a range of types, including, but not limited to, large family units, Supportive Housing, housing for transition age foster youth, and deep affordability targeted for Extremely Low-Income Households in all parts of the Jurisdiction, with at least some of the zoning, other land use designation methods, or incentives being designed to increase affordable housing development in higher resource areas shown in the TCAC/HCD Opportunity Map, and with the Jurisdiction having confirmed that it considered and addressed 2 19.b
Packet Pg. 269
Attachment: Draft Prohousing Designation Application (Prohousing Designation) potential environmental justice issues in adopting and implementing this policy, especially in areas with existing industrial and polluting uses.
1H Zoning or other land use designation methods to allow for residential or mixed uses in one or more non-residential zones (e.g., commercial, light industrial). Qualifying non-residential zones do not include open space or substantially similar zones.
1 1I Modification of development standards and other applicable zoning provisions or land use designation methods to promote greater development intensity. Potential areas of focus include floor area ratio, height limits, minimum lot or unit sizes, setbacks, and allowable dwelling units per acre. These policies must be separate from any qualifying policies under Category (1)(B) above.
1 1J Establishment of a Workforce Housing Opportunity Zone, as defined in Government Code section 65620, or a Housing Sustainability District, as defined in Government Code section 66200.
1 1K Establishment of an inclusionary housing program requiring new developments to include housing affordable to and reserved for low- and very low-income households, consistent with the requirements of AB 1505 (Chapter 376, Statutes of 2017, Gov. Code, § 65850.01). 1 1L Other zoning and land use actions not described in Categories (A)-(K) of this section that measurably support the Acceleration of Housing Production.
1 19.b
Packet Pg. 270
Attachment: Draft Prohousing Designation Application (Prohousing Designation) Project Proposal
Category 2: Acceleration of Housing Production Timeframes

Category Prohousing Policy Description Points
2A Establishment of ministerial approval processes for multiple housing types, including, for example, single-family, multifamily and mixed-use housing.
3 2B Acceleration of Housing Production through the establishment of streamlined, program-level CEQA analysis and certification of general plans, community plans, specific plans with accompanying Environmental Impact Reports (EIR), and related documents. 2 2C Documented practice of streamlining housing development at the project level, such as by enabling a by-right approval process or by utilizing statutory and categorical exemptions as authorized by applicable law, (e.g., Pub. Resources Code, §§ 21155.1, 21155.4, 21159.24, 21159.25; Gov. Code, § 65457; Cal Code Regs., tit. 14, §§ 15303, 15332; Pub. Resources Code, §§ 21094.5, 21099, 21155.2, 21159.28).
2 2D Establishment of permitting processes that take less than four months to complete. Policies under this category must address all approvals necessary to issue building permits.
2 2E Absence or elimination of public hearings for projects consistent with zoning and the general plan.
2 2F Priority permit processing or reduced plan check times for homes affordable to Lower-Income Households.
1 2G Establishment of consolidated or streamlined permit processes that minimize the levels of review and approval required for projects, and that are consistent with zoning regulations and the general plan. 1 2H Absence, elimination, or replacement of subjective development and design standards with objective development and design standards that simplify zoning clearance and improve approval certainty and timing.
1 2I Establishment of one-stop-shop permitting processes or a single point of contact where entitlements are coordinated across city approval functions (e.g., planning, public works, building) from entitlement application to certificate of occupancy.
1 2J Priority permit processing or reduced plan check times for ADUs/JADUs or multifamily housing.
1 2K Establishment of a standardized application form for all entitlement applications.
1 2L Documented practice of publicly posting status updates on project permit approvals on the internet.
1 2M Limitation on the total number of hearings for any project to three or fewer. Applicants that accrue points pursuant to category (2)(E) are not eligible for points under this category.
1 2N Other policies not described in Categories (2)(A)-(M) of this section that quantifiably decrease production timeframes or promote the streamlining of approval processes.
1 19.b
Packet Pg. 271
Attachment: Draft Prohousing Designation Application (Prohousing Designation) Project Proposal
Category 3: Reduction of Construction and Development Costs

Category Prohousing Policy Description Points
3A Waiver or significant reduction of development impact fees for residential development with units affordable to Lower-Income Households. This provision does not include fees associated with the provision of housing affordable to Lower-Income Households (e.g., inclusionary in lieu fees, affordable housing impact fees, and commercial linkage fees).
3 3B Adoption of policies that result in less restrictive requirements than Government Code sections 65852.2 and 65852.22 to reduce barriers for property owners to create ADUs/JADUs. Examples of qualifying policies include, but are not limited to, development standards improvements, permit processing improvements, dedicated ADU/JADU staff, technical assistance programs, and pre-approved ADU/JADU design packages.
2 3C Adoption of other fee reduction strategies separate from Category (3)(A), including fee deferrals and reduced fees for housing for persons with special needs. This provision does not include fees associated with the provision of housing affordable to Lower-Income Households (e.g., inclusionary in lieu fees, affordable impact fees and commercial linkage fees).
1 3D Accelerating innovative housing production through innovative housing types (e.g., manufactured homes, recreational vehicles, park models, community ownership, and other forms of social housing) that reduce development costs.
1 3E Measures that reduce costs for transportation-related infrastructure or programs that encourage active modes of transportation or other alternatives to automobiles. Qualifying policies include, but are not limited to, publicly funded programs to expand sidewalks or protect bike/micro-mobility lanes, creation of on-street parking for bikes, transit-related improvements, or establishment of carshare programs. 1 3F Adoption of universal design ordinances pursuant to Health and Safety Code section 17959.
1 3G Establishment of pre-approved or prototype plans for missing middle housing types (e.g., duplexes, triplexes, and fourplexes) in low- density, single-family residential areas.
1 3H Adoption of ordinances that reduce barriers, beyond existing law, for the development of housing affordable to Lower-Income Households. 1 3I Other policies not described in Categories (3)(A)-(H) of this section that quantifiably reduce construction or development costs. 1 19.b
Packet Pg. 272
Attachment: Draft Prohousing Designation Application (Prohousing Designation) Project Proposal
Category 4: Providing Financial Subsidies

Category Prohousing Policy Description Points
4A Establishment of a housing fund or contribution of funds towards affordable housing through proceeds from approved ballot measures.
2 4B Establishment of local housing trust funds or collaboration on a regional housing trust fund, which include the Jurisdiction’s own funding contributions. The Jurisdiction must contribute to the local or regional housing trust fund regularly and significantly. For the purposes of this Category, “regularly” shall be defined as at least annually, and “significant” contributions shall be determined based on the impact the contributions have in accelerating the production of affordable housing.
2 4C Demonstration of regular use or planned regular use of funding (e.g., federal, state, or local) for preserving assisted units at-risk of conversion to market rate uses and conversion of market rate uses to units with affordability restrictions (e.g., acquisition/rehabilitation).

For the purposes of this category, “regular use” can be demonstrated through the number of units preserved annually by utilizing this funding source.
2 4D Provide grants or low-interest loans for ADU/JADU construction affordable to Lower- and Moderate-Income Households.
2 4E A comprehensive program that complies with the Surplus Land Act (Gov. Code, § 54220 et seq.) and that makes publicly owned land available for affordable housing, or for multifamily housing projects with the highest feasible percentage of units affordable to Lower Income Households. A qualifying program may utilize mechanisms such as land donations, land sales with significant write-downs, or below-market land leases.
2 4F Establishment of an Enhanced Infrastructure Financing District or similar local financing tool that, to the extent feasible, directly supports housing developments in an area where at least 20 percent of the residences will be affordable to Lower-Income Households. 2 4G Prioritization of local general funds to accelerate the production of housing affordable to Lower-Income Households.
2 4H Directed residual redevelopment funds to accelerate the production of affordable housing.
1 4I Development and regular (at least biennial) use of a housing subsidy pool, local or regional trust fund, or other similar funding source sufficient to facilitate and support the development of housing affordable to Lower-Income Households.
1 19.b
Packet Pg. 273
Attachment: Draft Prohousing Designation Application (Prohousing Designation) 4J Prioritization of local general funds for affordable housing. This point shall not be awarded if the applicant earns two points pursuant to Category (4)(G).
1 4K Providing operating subsidies for permanent Supportive Housing. 1 4L Providing subsidies for housing affordable to Extremely Low-Income Households.
1 4M Other policies not described in Categories (4)(A)-(L) of this section that quantifiably promote, develop, or leverage financial resources for housing affordable to Lower-Income Households.
1 19.b
Packet Pg. 274
Attachment: Draft Prohousing Designation Application (Prohousing Designation) Project Proposal
Enhancement Factors

The Department shall utilize enhancement factors to increase the point scores of Prohousing Policies. An individual Prohousing Policy may not use more than one enhancement factor.

Each Prohousing Policy will receive extra points for enhancement factors in accordance with the chart below.

Category Prohousing Policy Description Points
1 The policy represents one element of a unified, multi-faceted strategy to promote multiple planning objectives, such as efficient land use, access to public transportation, housing affordable to Lower-Income Households, climate change solutions, and/or hazard mitigation.
2 2 Policies that promote development consistent with the state planning priorities pursuant to Government Code section 65041.1. 1 3 Policies that diversify planning and target community and economic development investments (housing and non-housing) toward place- based strategies for community revitalization and equitable quality of life in lower opportunity areas. Such areas include, but are not limited to, Low Resource and High Segregation & Poverty areas designated in the most recently updated TCAC/HCD Opportunity Maps, and disadvantaged communities pursuant to Health and Safety Code sections 39711 and 39715 (California Senate Bill 535 (2012).
1 4 Policies that go beyond state law requirements in reducing displacement of Lower-Income Households and conserving existing housing stock that is affordable to Lower-Income Households. 1 5 Rezoning and other policies that support intensification of residential development in Location Efficient Communities.
1 6 Rezoning and other policies that result in a net gain of housing capacity while concurrently mitigating development impacts on or from Environmentally Sensitive or Hazardous Areas.
1 7 Zoning policies, including inclusionary housing policies, that increase housing choices and affordability, particularly for Lower-Income Households, in High Resource and Highest Resource areas, as designated in the most recently updated TCAC/HCD Opportunity Maps.
1 8 Other policies that involve meaningful actions towards Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing outside of those required pursuant to Government Code sections 65583, subdivision (c)(10), and 8899.50, including, but not limited to, outreach campaigns, updated zoning codes, and expanded access to financing support.
1 19.b
Packet Pg. 275
Attachment: Draft Prohousing Designation Application (Prohousing Designation) Project Proposal Scoring Sheet Instructions

The Department shall validate applicants’ scores based on the extent to which each identified Prohousing Policy contributes to the Acceleration of Housing Production. The Department shall assess applicants’ Prohousing Policies in accordance with statutory requirements and the Regulations.

The Department shall further assess applicants’ Prohousing Policies using the following four scoring categories: Favorable Zoning and Land Use, Acceleration of Housing Production Timeframes, Reduction of Construction and Development Costs, and Providing Financial Subsidies. Applicants shall demonstrate that they have enacted or proposed at least one policy that significantly contributes to the Acceleration of Housing Production in each of the four categories. A Prohousing Designation requires a total score of 30 points or more across all four categories.

Instructions

Please utilize one row of the Scoring Sheet for each Prohousing Policy.

• Category Number: Select the relevant category number from the relevant Project Proposal list in this application. Where appropriate, applicants may utilize a category number more than once. • Concise Written Description of Prohousing Policy: Set forth a brief description of the enacted or proposed Prohousing Policy.
• Enacted or Proposed: Identify the Prohousing Policy as enacted or proposed. For proposed Prohousing Policies, please complete Appendix 2: Proposed Policy Completion Schedule. • Documentation Type: For enacted Prohousing Policies, identify the relevant documentary evidence (e.g., resolution, zoning code provisions). For proposed Prohousing Policies, identify the documentation which shows that implementation of the policy is pending.
• Web Links/Electronic Copies: Insert the Web link(s) to the relevant documentation or indicate that electronic copies of the documentation have been attached to this application as Appendix 5. • Points: Enter the appropriate number of points using the relevant Project Proposal list in this application. • Enhancement Category Number (optional): If utilizing an enhancement factor for a particular Prohousing Policy, enter the appropriate category number using the relevant Project Proposal list in this application. • Enhancement Points (optional): If utilizing an enhancement factor for a particular Prohousing Policy, enter the point(s) for that Prohousing Policy.
• Total Points: Add the enhancement point(s) to the Prohousing Policy’s general point score.

19.b
Packet Pg. 276
Attachment: Draft Prohousing Designation Application (Prohousing Designation) Formal Resolution for the Prohousing Designation Program (New 01/24)
[Materials to be included with City Council Report]
Appendix 1: Formal Resolution for the Prohousing Designation Program

Formal Resolution for the PROHOUSING Designation Program RESOLUTION NO. [INSERT RESOLUTION NUMBER]

A RESOLUTION OF THE GOVERNING BODY OF
[INSERT THE NAME OF THE CITY OR COUNTY] AUTHORIZING APPLICATION TO

AND PARTICIPATION IN THE PROHOUSING DESIGNATION PROGRAM WHEREAS, Government Code section 65589.9 established the Prohousing Designation Program (“Program”), which creates incentives for jurisdictions that are compliant with state housing element requirements and that have enacted Prohousing local policies; and WHEREAS, such jurisdictions will be designated Prohousing, and, as such, will receive additional points or other preference during the scoring of their competitive Applications for specified housing and infrastructure funding; and
WHEREAS, the California Department of Housing and Community Development (“Department”) has adopted regulations (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 25, § 6600 et seq.) to implement the Program (“Program Regulations”), as authorized by Government Code section 65589.9, subdivision (d); and
WHEREAS, the [INSERT THE NAME OF THE CITY OR COUNTY]
(“Applicant”) desires to submit an Application for a Prohousing Designation (“Application”).

THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED THAT:

1. Applicant is hereby authorized and directed to submit an Application to the Department.

2. Applicant acknowledges and confirms that it is currently in compliance with applicable state housing law.

3. Applicant acknowledges and confirms that it will continue to comply with applicable housing laws and to refrain from enacting laws, developing policies, or taking other local governmental actions that may or do inhibit or constrain housing production.

Examples of such local laws, policies, and actions include moratoriums on development; local voter approval requirements related to housing production; downzoning; and unduly restrictive or onerous zoning regulations, development standards, or permit procedures. Applicant further acknowledges and confirms that the Prohousing Policies in its Application comply with its duty to Affirmatively Further Fair Housing pursuant to Government Code sections 8899.50 and 65583. Applicant further acknowledges and confirms that its general plan is in alignment with an adopted sustainable communities strategy pursuant to Public Resources Code sections 21155- 21155.4. Applicant further acknowledges and confirms that its policies for the treatment of homeless encampments on public property comply do and will continue to

19.b
Packet Pg. 277
Attachment: Draft Prohousing Designation Application (Prohousing Designation) comply with the Constitution and that it has enacted best practices in its jurisdiction that are consistent with the United States Interagency Council on Homelessness’ “7 Principles for Addressing Encampments” (June 17, 2022, update).

4. If the Application is approved, Applicant is hereby authorized and directed to enter into, execute, and deliver all documents required or deemed necessary or appropriate to participate in the Program, and all amendments thereto (the “Program Documents”).

5. Applicant acknowledges and agrees that it shall be subject to the Application, the terms and conditions specified in the Program Documents, the Program Regulations, and any and all other applicable law.

6. [INSERT THE TITLE OF THE APPLICANT’S AUTHORIZED
SIGNATORY] is authorized to execute and deliver the Application and the Program Documents on behalf of the Applicant for participation in the Program.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of , 2024, by the following vote:

AYES: [Insert #] NOES: [Insert #] ABSENT: [Insert #] ABSTAIN: [Insert #] The undersigned, [INSERT NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNATORY] of Applicant, does hereby attest and certify that the foregoing is a true and full copy of a resolution of the Applicant’s governing body adopted at a duly convened meeting on the date above-mentioned, and that the resolution has not been altered, amended, or repealed.

SIGNATURE: DATE:

NAME: TITLE:

19.b
Packet Pg. 278
Attachment: Draft Prohousing Designation Application (Prohousing Designation) Appendix 2: Proposed Policy Completion Schedule

Category
Number
Concise Written Description of
Proposed Policy
Key Milestones and
Milestone Dates
Anticipated
Completion
Date
Notes
1B Consistent with Program H-1h
(Periodic Ordinance Amendments) of
the City's Housing Element, the City
has initiated an update to the Campbell
Municipal Code to revise its standards
for SB 9 projects in accordance with
SB 450. Proposed changes are
intended to retain and build upon
existing provisions in the code that
already surpass the requirements of
state law, by establishing development
standards for SB 9 projects that are
more permissive than those for
standard single-family projects in low-
density, single-family residential zones.

These standards include allowing
subdivisions with narrower frontage
widths (12 feet vs. 15 feet for flag lot
properties) and narrower lot widths (25
feet vs. 60 feet) than would otherwise
be permitted and allowing their use
even in situations where housing units
are not concurrently proposed as part
of an SB 9 project.

Submittal of draft Text
Amendments to City
Attorney's Office by
December 20, 2024.

City Attorney review
completed by March 28,
2025.

Revisions in response to
City Attorney review by
April 18, 2025.

Item tentatively scheduled
for a public hearing with
the Planning Commission
on May 20, 2025.

Item tentatively scheduled
for a public hearing with
the City Council on June
17, 2025.

June 17,
2025
N/A
1E The City of Campbell's pending
Accessory Dwelling Unit Ordinance
(Chapter 21.23) will allow for 8
accessory dwelling units for either an
existing or proposed multi-family
dwelling site where state law provides
that cities may limit a proposed multi-
Consideration by Planning
Commission by October
22, 2024.

Item tentatively scheduled
for a public hearing with
the City Council on
November 19, 2024.

December 3,
2024
N/A

19.b
Packet Pg. 279
Attachment: Draft Prohousing Designation Application (Prohousing Designation) family dwelling site to a total of two
accessory dwelling units. As a result,
the City's proposed ADU Ordinance
will allow for 6 more units for proposed
multi-family dwelling sites than
otherwise required by State Law.

The City's ADU Ordinance will allow for
increased housing density in areas
already well-served by public
transportation and close to daily
destinations. By promoting more
housing in transit-accessible, well-
connected areas, the ordinance aligns
with state goals for sustainable
development, reducing reliance on
cars, and fostering more vibrant
neighborhoods.

Item tentatively scheduled
for a public hearing with
the City Council on
December 3, 2024.

1G The City is implementing a
comprehensive program to promote
equitable development and address
housing needs through a series of
coordinated policy actions. First, the
Affordable Housing (AH) Overlay zone
will provide a range of incentives for
developing various housing types
citywide, including in higher resource
areas identified in the TCAC/HCD
Opportunity Map. Concurrently, the
City is advancing Program H-1g from
the 2023-2031 Housing Element,
which proposes a new overlay zone to
implement SB-10. This overlay is
expected to cover a significant portion
of the City, focusing 75% of SB-10 unit
The City's SB 10
Ordinance was
temporarily delayed to
respond to changes to
state law for missing-
middle housing types and
typologies (including in
response to recent
amendments to SB 684).

Following completion of
updates to the City's
standard development
requirements for missing-
middle housing types (i.e.,
duplexes) which are
anticipated to be
completed by June 17,
2025, this update would
November
18, 2025
N/A

19.b
Packet Pg. 280
Attachment: Draft Prohousing Designation Application (Prohousing Designation) production in RCAAs and high-
resource tracts, particularly in areas
zoned for low-density, single-family
residential development.

In parallel, the City is preparing a
Climate Action Plan (per General Plan
Program COS-10.c), which includes a
vulnerability assessment and an
evaluation of potential environmental
justice issues. This plan will inform the
development of other programs and
policies. Additionally, the City is
updating its Economic Development
Plan to align with General Plan
strategies, focusing on targeted
investments in disadvantaged areas to
support community and economic
growth. Together, these efforts form an
integrated approach to housing,
environmental justice, and economic
development.
restart with community
meetings being held in
July and August 2025.

Staff would then present
options to the Planning
Commission in
September 2025, prior to
advancing to City Council
in November 2025 for
adoption.

1J The 2023-2031 Housing Element
included Program H-2d: Workforce
Housing, which calls for the adoption of
a resolution to authorize Workforce
Housing opportunities within Campbell.

Once established organizations will be
allowed to use tax-exempt bonds to
acquire market-rate apartment
buildings and convert them to
affordable housing projects for
workforce housing, either in a specified
planning area (i.e., zone) or Citywide.

As a Citywide program, workforce
Development of the City's
Workforce Housing Policy
was temporarily delayed
as the City shifted its on
hiring a Housing Manager
to oversee the
development and
implementation of the
program.

On January 8, 2024, the
City hired a Housing
Manager (see Verification
of Hire - 1L) which is
overseeing
Est. 2027 or
beyond. - No
points being
sought.

N/A

19.b
Packet Pg. 281
Attachment: Draft Prohousing Designation Application (Prohousing Designation) housing will include opportunities in
identified high/highest resource areas
in the City of Campbell as depicted by
the latest 2024 HCD Opportunity
Maps.
implementation of
Housing Element policies
and program
development.

Staff anticipates starting
the development of a
Work Force Housing
Opportunity Zone to follow
completion of the City's
SB 10 Ordinance (See
Policy 1G) which has a
target completion date of
November 18, 2025.

Depending on the initial
number of potential sites
identified, the City will
decide to advance with
the program or explore
alternative options. For
this reason, no points are
being pursued in this
category currently.
2A In 2023, the City of Campbell adopted
Chapter 21.39 - Ministerial Approvals, to
the Campbell Municipal Code. This
Ordinance provides for ministerial review
and approval of projects which meet the
requirements specific in State Supportive
Housing Law, State Low Barrier
Navigations Centers Law, and/or the State
Streamlined Ministerial Approval process.

Further, the City is developing an
Ordinance to allow for the ministerial
approval of all single-family housing
projects for individual single-family units,
as well as projects involving two or more
single-family homes, in furtherance of
Submittal of draft Text
Amendments to City
Attorney's Office by
December 20, 2024.

City Attorney review
completed by March 28,
2025.

Revisions in response to
City Attorney review by
April 18, 2025.

Item tentatively scheduled
for a public hearing with
the Planning Commission
June 17,
2025
N/A

19.b
Packet Pg. 282
Attachment: Draft Prohousing Designation Application (Prohousing Designation) Housing Element Program H-1g (SB 10
Ordinance) and a separate code update in
response to SB 684 (2023-2024) for infill
development of 10 homes or less in multi-
family zones.

on May 20, 2025.

Item tentatively scheduled
for a public hearing with
the City Council on June
17, 2025.
2N On October 15, 2024, the City Council
adopted Ordinance No. 2320, introducing
a streamlined approach to expedite the
preparation of technical studies for new
development projects, including housing.

This ordinance replaces the traditional,
time-intensive process of issuing a formal
request for proposals (RFP) for each
project with a pre-approved, on-call bench
of consultants. By allowing applicants to
select qualified consultants from this
bench before project submission, the City
eliminates months (1-2 months minimum)
of potential delays associated with
advertising, selecting, and negotiating with
consultants. This proactive selection
process reduces the most significant
bottleneck in permit processing, enabling
faster approvals and accelerating the
timeline for housing development projects
across the city.

This program will be
implemented in phases
with a focus on releasing
an RFQ to establish a
pre-qualified list of
consultants for the
preparation of Arborist
and Wireless Reports
occurring in December
2024. In January 2025,
the City plans to release
an RFP for Historic
Consultant, Traffic
Consultant, and CEQA
Consultant. For the other
identified studies subject
to a pre-qualified
consultant list, and Master
Services Agreement, the
City again would
implement a phased
rollout, with completion of
all service needs
identified by December
2026.

December
18, 2026
N/A
3D Program H-1m of the Housing Element,
allows for increases in residential densities
for innovative housing types which have
smaller unit sizes. This program will allow
for smaller units to count as one-half a unit
for density calculation - allowing for more
units at lower costs.

Submittal of draft Text
Amendments to City
Attorney's Office by
December 20, 2024.

City Attorney review
completed by March 28,
2025.

June 17,
2025
Effort to be synchronized with
updates described in Policy 1B.

19.b
Packet Pg. 283
Attachment: Draft Prohousing Designation Application (Prohousing Designation) At this time, a draft Ordinance reflecting
these changes, as well as other recent
amendments to state law adopted in the
2024 Legislative Cycle, have been drafted
and undergoing internal review.

Revisions in response to
City Attorney review by
April 18, 2025.

Item tentatively scheduled
for a public hearing with
the Planning Commission
on May 20, 2025.

Item tentatively scheduled
for a public hearing with
the City Council on June
17, 2025.

19.b
Packet Pg. 284
Attachment: Draft Prohousing Designation Application (Prohousing Designation) Appendix 3: Project Proposal Scoring Sheet

Category
Number
Concise Written
Description of
Prohousing Policy
Enacted or
Proposed
Documentation
Type (e.g.,
resolution, zoning
code)
Insert Web
Links to
Documents or
Indicate that
Electronic
Copies are
Attached as
Appendix 5
Points Enhancement
Category
Number
Enhancement
Points
Total Points
1B Consistent with
Program H-1h
(Periodic Ordinance
Amendments) of the
City's Housing
Element, the City has
initiated an update to
the Campbell
Municipal Code to
revise its standards
for SB 9 projects in
accordance with SB
450. Proposed
changes are intended
to retain and build
upon existing
provisions in the
code that already
surpass the
requirements of state
law, by establishing
development
standards for SB 9
projects that are
more permissive than
those for standard
single-family projects
in low-density, single-
Enacted &
Proposed
City Council
Ordinance No.
2286 - Weblink
2023-2031
Housing
Element:
https://www.c
ampbellca.go
v/ArchiveCen
ter/ViewFile/I
tem/2953

City Council
Ordinance
No. 2286
https://library
.municode.co
m/ca/campb
ell/ordinance
s/code_of_or
dinances?no
deId=117122
7 3 N/A 0 3

19.b
Packet Pg. 285
Attachment: Draft Prohousing Designation Application (Prohousing Designation) Category
Number
Concise Written
Description of
Prohousing Policy
Enacted or
Proposed
Documentation
Type (e.g.,
resolution, zoning
code)
Insert Web
Links to
Documents or
Indicate that
Electronic
Copies are
Attached as
Appendix 5
Points Enhancement
Category
Number
Enhancement
Points
Total Points
family residential
zones. These
standards include
allowing subdivisions
with narrower
frontage widths (12
feet vs. 15 feet for
flag lot properties)
and narrower lot
widths (25 feet vs. 60
feet) than would
otherwise be
permitted, and
allowing their use
even in situations
where housing units
are not concurrently
proposed as part of
an SB 9 project.
1C Sites identified in the
2023-2031 Housing
Element show
capacity for 178% of
the total RHNA
(2,977 total units
assigned; capacity
for over 5,311 units
provided). By
individual income
levels, the City
achieves the
Enacted
2040 General
Plan - Weblink

2023-2031
Housing Element -
Weblink

2023-2031
Housing
Opportunity Map -
Weblink

2040
General
Plan:
https://www.c
ampbellca.go
v/Archive.as
px?ADID=29
51 2023-2031
Housing
Element:
2 6 1 3

19.b
Packet Pg. 286
Attachment: Draft Prohousing Designation Application (Prohousing Designation) Category
Number
Concise Written
Description of
Prohousing Policy
Enacted or
Proposed
Documentation
Type (e.g.,
resolution, zoning
code)
Insert Web
Links to
Documents or
Indicate that
Electronic
Copies are
Attached as
Appendix 5
Points Enhancement
Category
Number
Enhancement
Points
Total Points
following totals:

• Very Low-Income =
150%
• Low-Income =
187%
• Moderate = 138%
• Above-Moderate =
205%

Required rezoning
was completed with
the adoption of the
Housing Element and
General Plan with a
focus on adding
housing supply in
areas that avoided
hazard zones (i.e.,
high-risk flood zones,
landslide and erosion
zones, wildfire zones,
and hazardous waste
sites) and
environmentally
sensitive areas (i.e.,
critical wildlife
habitats, wetlands).

In fact, very few of
the sites designated
as housing
Zoning Map -
Weblink

Housing Units
Projected by
Income Level -
Weblink

Housing Opp.

Sites Avoiding
Hazard Areas
Map - Weblink

https://www.c
ampbellca.go
v/ArchiveCen
ter/ViewFile/I
tem/2953

2023-2031
Housing
Opportunity
Map:
https://www.c
ampbellca.go
v/Document
Center/View/
20693/Housi
ng-
Opportunity-
Map-2023-
2031---6th-
Cycle

Zoning Map:
https://www.c
ampbellca.go
v/ArchiveCen
ter/ViewFile/I
tem/3172

Housing
Units
Projected

19.b
Packet Pg. 287
Attachment: Draft Prohousing Designation Application (Prohousing Designation) Category
Number
Concise Written
Description of
Prohousing Policy
Enacted or
Proposed
Documentation
Type (e.g.,
resolution, zoning
code)
Insert Web
Links to
Documents or
Indicate that
Electronic
Copies are
Attached as
Appendix 5
Points Enhancement
Category
Number
Enhancement
Points
Total Points
opportunity sites are
located in any type of
hazard zone or
environmentally
sensitive area as
noted. The Housing
Element, and
associated rezoning
efforts, meet the
requirements of a
unified, multi-faceted
strategy by
addressing several
key planning
objectives:

• Efficient Land Use:

Sites were selected
to avoid viable
businesses that
generate revenue
and are unlikely to
redevelop, preserving
economic stability.
• Access to Public
Transportation: The
selected housing
sites are positioned
to promote
accessibility to public
transportation,
by Income
Level:
https://www.c
ampbellca.go
v/Document
Center/View/
22425/Housi
ng-
Opportunity-
Site---Unit-
Projections

Housing
Opp. Sites
Avoiding
Hazard
Areas:
https://www.c
ampbellca.go
v/Document
Center/View/
23170/1C---
Hazards-
and-
Housing-
Opp-Sites

19.b
Packet Pg. 288
Attachment: Draft Prohousing Designation Application (Prohousing Designation) Category
Number
Concise Written
Description of
Prohousing Policy
Enacted or
Proposed
Documentation
Type (e.g.,
resolution, zoning
code)
Insert Web
Links to
Documents or
Indicate that
Electronic
Copies are
Attached as
Appendix 5
Points Enhancement
Category
Number
Enhancement
Points
Total Points
reducing reliance on
private vehicles and
in areas locally
designated as
"walkable areas" with
limited to no parking
required.
• Affordable Housing
for Lower-Income
Households: The
Housing Element
significantly exceeds
RHNA targets for
very low- and low-
income housing,
ensuring a
substantial portion of
new housing will be
affordable to lower-
income households.
• Climate Change
Solutions: The policy
supports climate
goals by prioritizing
development in areas
that avoid
environmentally
sensitive zones,
reducing exposure to
climate-related risks
like flooding,

19.b
Packet Pg. 289
Attachment: Draft Prohousing Designation Application (Prohousing Designation) Category
Number
Concise Written
Description of
Prohousing Policy
Enacted or
Proposed
Documentation
Type (e.g.,
resolution, zoning
code)
Insert Web
Links to
Documents or
Indicate that
Electronic
Copies are
Attached as
Appendix 5
Points Enhancement
Category
Number
Enhancement
Points
Total Points
wildfires, and
erosion. This helps
build resilient
communities.
• Hazard Mitigation:

By ensuring that
none of the housing
opportunity sites are
located in high-risk
hazard zones (e.g.,
flood zones, wildfire
areas, hazardous
waste sites), the
policy directly
contributes to hazard
mitigation,
safeguarding
residents and
property.
• Hazard Mitigation:

By ensuring that
none of the housing
opportunity sites are
located in high-risk
hazard zones (e.g.,
flood zones, wildfire
areas, hazardous
waste sites), the
policy directly
contributes to hazard
mitigation,

19.b
Packet Pg. 290
Attachment: Draft Prohousing Designation Application (Prohousing Designation) Category
Number
Concise Written
Description of
Prohousing Policy
Enacted or
Proposed
Documentation
Type (e.g.,
resolution, zoning
code)
Insert Web
Links to
Documents or
Indicate that
Electronic
Copies are
Attached as
Appendix 5
Points Enhancement
Category
Number
Enhancement
Points
Total Points
safeguarding
residents and
property.

Together, these
efforts align with
broader city goals of
promoting
sustainable,
equitable, and
resilient urban
development.
1D The City of
Campbell’s local
density bonus
program supports
California
Government Code
Section 65041.1 by
promoting infill
development and
equity, conserving
open space, and
encouraging efficient
land use. By offering
a 30% density bonus
(10% above statutory
requirements of Gov.

Code Section 65915
et seq.) for projects
that include units for
Enacted
Municipal Code -
Weblink

City Council
Ordinance No.
2293 - Weblink
CMC

21.20.60.B.

Local
Incentives:
https://library
.municode.co
m/ca/campb
ell/codes/cod
e_of_ordinan
ces?nodeId=
TIT21ZO_C
H21.20DEB
OOTHOIN_2

1.20.060IN

City Council
Ordinance
No. 2293
https://library
2 1 2 4

19.b
Packet Pg. 291
Attachment: Draft Prohousing Designation Application (Prohousing Designation) Category
Number
Concise Written
Description of
Prohousing Policy
Enacted or
Proposed
Documentation
Type (e.g.,
resolution, zoning
code)
Insert Web
Links to
Documents or
Indicate that
Electronic
Copies are
Attached as
Appendix 5
Points Enhancement
Category
Number
Enhancement
Points
Total Points
extremely low-
income residents, the
program incentivizes
denser, affordable
housing within urban
areas, reducing the
need for suburban
sprawl and
supporting
sustainable, transit-
accessible
communities. Though
recently adopted and
not yet utilized, this
program applies
citywide and aligns
with state goals for
equitable and
efficient development
and supports
implementation of
goals of the 2040
General Plan
(Envision Campbell)
including LU-5, LU-3,
LU-1, LU-7, LU-9, T-
3, T-4, & CAAP.
.municode.co
m/ca/campb
ell/ordinance
s/code_of_or
dinances?no
deId=122225
0 1E The City of
Campbell's pending
Accessory Dwelling
Unit Ordinance
Proposed
Planning
Commission Staff
Report - Weblink
October 22,
2024 - PC
Staff Report
https://www.c
2 5 1 3

19.b
Packet Pg. 292
Attachment: Draft Prohousing Designation Application (Prohousing Designation) Category
Number
Concise Written
Description of
Prohousing Policy
Enacted or
Proposed
Documentation
Type (e.g.,
resolution, zoning
code)
Insert Web
Links to
Documents or
Indicate that
Electronic
Copies are
Attached as
Appendix 5
Points Enhancement
Category
Number
Enhancement
Points
Total Points
(Chapter 21.23) will
allow for 8 accessory
dwelling units for
either an existing or
proposed multi-family
dwelling site where
state law provides
that cities may limit a
proposed multi-family
dwelling site to a total
of two accessory
dwelling units. As a
result, the City's
proposed ADU
Ordinance will allow
for 6 more units for
proposed multi-family
dwelling sites than
otherwise required by
State Law.

The City's ADU
Ordinance will allow
for increased housing
density in areas
already well-served
by public
transportation and
close to daily
destinations. By
promoting more
ampbellca.go
v/AgendaCe
nter/ViewFile
/Agenda/_10
222024-2992

Properties
Located
within One-
Half Mile of
Public
Transit:
https://www.c
ampbellca.go
v/Document
Center/View/
20358/AB20
97-Map

19.b
Packet Pg. 293
Attachment: Draft Prohousing Designation Application (Prohousing Designation) Category
Number
Concise Written
Description of
Prohousing Policy
Enacted or
Proposed
Documentation
Type (e.g.,
resolution, zoning
code)
Insert Web
Links to
Documents or
Indicate that
Electronic
Copies are
Attached as
Appendix 5
Points Enhancement
Category
Number
Enhancement
Points
Total Points
housing in transit-
accessible, well-
connected areas, the
ordinance aligns with
state goals for
sustainable
development,
reducing reliance on
cars, and fostering
more vibrant
neighborhoods.
1F
On November 7,
2023, the City
Council adopted
Ordinance No. 2299
which eliminated all
parking requirements
for accessory
dwelling units
Citywide as
authorized by
Government Code
Section 65852.2.

Enacted
City Council
Ordinance No.
2299 - Weblink

Campbell
Municipal Code -
Weblink
City Council
Ordinance
No. 2299
http://guadal
upe/WebLink
/DocView.as
px?id=21313
4 CMC
Section

21.23.030 -
Accessory
Dwelling
Unit
Developmen
t Standards
https://library
.municode.co
m/ca/campb
2 N/A N/A 2

19.b
Packet Pg. 294
Attachment: Draft Prohousing Designation Application (Prohousing Designation) Category
Number
Concise Written
Description of
Prohousing Policy
Enacted or
Proposed
Documentation
Type (e.g.,
resolution, zoning
code)
Insert Web
Links to
Documents or
Indicate that
Electronic
Copies are
Attached as
Appendix 5
Points Enhancement
Category
Number
Enhancement
Points
Total Points
ell/codes/cod
e_of_ordinan
ces?nodeId=
TIT21ZO_C
H21.23ACD
WUN_21.23.
030ACDWU
NDEST
1G The City is
implementing a
comprehensive
program to promote
equitable
development and
address housing
needs through a
series of coordinated
policy actions. First,
the Affordable
Housing (AH)
Overlay zone will
provide a range of
incentives for
developing various
housing types
citywide, including in
higher resource
areas identified in the

TCAC/HCD
Opportunity Map.

Concurrently, the City
Enacted &
Proposed
Council Study
Session (AH
Overlay) - Weblink
City Council
Study
Session
Report -
Establishing
AH Overlay:
https://www.c
ampbellca.go
v/AgendaCe
nter/ViewFile
/Agenda/_10
172023-2817

City Council
Report
Minutes:
https://www.c
ampbellca.go
v/AgendaCe
nter/ViewFile
/Minutes/_10
172023-2817
2 3 1 3

19.b
Packet Pg. 295
Attachment: Draft Prohousing Designation Application (Prohousing Designation) Category
Number
Concise Written
Description of
Prohousing Policy
Enacted or
Proposed
Documentation
Type (e.g.,
resolution, zoning
code)
Insert Web
Links to
Documents or
Indicate that
Electronic
Copies are
Attached as
Appendix 5
Points Enhancement
Category
Number
Enhancement
Points
Total Points
is advancing
Program H-1g from
the 2023-2031
Housing Element,
which proposes a
new overlay zone to
implement SB-10.

This overlay is
expected to cover a
significant portion of
the City, focusing
75% of SB-10 unit
production in RCAAs
and high-resource
tracts, particularly in
areas zoned for low-
density, single-family
residential
development.

In parallel, the City is
preparing a Climate
Action Plan (per
General Plan
Program COS-10.c),
which includes a
vulnerability
assessment and an
evaluation of
potential
environmental justice

19.b
Packet Pg. 296
Attachment: Draft Prohousing Designation Application (Prohousing Designation) Category
Number
Concise Written
Description of
Prohousing Policy
Enacted or
Proposed
Documentation
Type (e.g.,
resolution, zoning
code)
Insert Web
Links to
Documents or
Indicate that
Electronic
Copies are
Attached as
Appendix 5
Points Enhancement
Category
Number
Enhancement
Points
Total Points
issues. This plan will
inform the
development of other
programs and
policies. Additionally,
the City is updating
its Economic
Development Plan to
align with General
Plan strategies,
focusing on targeted
investments in
disadvantaged areas
to support community
and economic
growth. Together,
these efforts form an
integrated approach
to housing,
environmental
justice, and economic
development.
1H The City has
established a
comprehensive
program to support a
diverse range of
housing options
within its commercial
and industrial zones.

This initiative allows
Enacted
Campbell
Municipal Code -
Weblink
CMC
Section

21.36.040 -
Caretaker or
Employee
Housing
https://library
.municode.co
m/ca/campb
1 N/A N/A 1

19.b
Packet Pg. 297
Attachment: Draft Prohousing Designation Application (Prohousing Designation) Category
Number
Concise Written
Description of
Prohousing Policy
Enacted or
Proposed
Documentation
Type (e.g.,
resolution, zoning
code)
Insert Web
Links to
Documents or
Indicate that
Electronic
Copies are
Attached as
Appendix 5
Points Enhancement
Category
Number
Enhancement
Points
Total Points
for caretaker and
employee housing in
the General
Commercial,
Research and
Development, and
Light Industrial
zoning districts,
provided that the
primary use of the
property remains
conforming. These
housing units,
permitted at 640 sq.
ft., can be developed
without a specific
limit on the number of
units possible,
offering flexibility to
meet workforce
housing needs.

Additionally, the
program includes
provisions for
convalescent and
rest homes within
Neighborhood
Commercial and
General Commercial
zoning districts,
ell/codes/cod
e_of_ordinan
ces?nodeId=
TIT21ZO_C
H21.36PRAP
SPUS_21.36
.040CAEMH
O

19.b
Packet Pg. 298
Attachment: Draft Prohousing Designation Application (Prohousing Designation) Category
Number
Concise Written
Description of
Prohousing Policy
Enacted or
Proposed
Documentation
Type (e.g.,
resolution, zoning
code)
Insert Web
Links to
Documents or
Indicate that
Electronic
Copies are
Attached as
Appendix 5
Points Enhancement
Category
Number
Enhancement
Points
Total Points
further expanding the
City’s housing
options for vulnerable
populations.

Together, these
policies form a
cohesive approach to
integrating residential
uses within
commercial and
industrial areas to
address housing
needs across
different sectors.
1I

In 2023, the City of
Campbell adopted
new Multi-Family
Development and
Design Standards
("MFDDS") which
resulted in significant
changes to the City's
longstanding
development
standards and
requirements for
multi-family and
mixed-use
development
projects. The
adoption of these
Enacted
Campbell MFDDS
- Weblink

Greater
Development
Intensity Map -
Weblink
Multi-Family
Developmen
t and
Design
Standards
https://www.c
ampbellca.go
v/ArchiveCen
ter/ViewFile/I
tem/2960

Greater
Developmen
t Intensity
Map
https://www.c
ampbellca.go
1 N/A N/A 1

19.b
Packet Pg. 299
Attachment: Draft Prohousing Designation Application (Prohousing Designation) Category
Number
Concise Written
Description of
Prohousing Policy
Enacted or
Proposed
Documentation
Type (e.g.,
resolution, zoning
code)
Insert Web
Links to
Documents or
Indicate that
Electronic
Copies are
Attached as
Appendix 5
Points Enhancement
Category
Number
Enhancement
Points
Total Points
standards broadly
resulted in the
elimination of floor
area ratio limits, and
provided for
significant increases
to height, reductions
to setbacks and
minimum lot size
requirements.

Specific examples of
these changes
include increases to
height of up from 40
feet to 75 feet
(representing an
increase of 35 feet)
and relative
increases in floor
area ratio from 55%
to approximately
533% (while FAR is
not explicitly limited;
accounting for
setbacks, height, and
other limiting factors
a "resultant" increase
in floor area ratio can
be estimated).
v/Document
Center/View/
23145/1I---
Greater-
Development
-Intensity

19.b
Packet Pg. 300
Attachment: Draft Prohousing Designation Application (Prohousing Designation) Category
Number
Concise Written
Description of
Prohousing Policy
Enacted or
Proposed
Documentation
Type (e.g.,
resolution, zoning
code)
Insert Web
Links to
Documents or
Indicate that
Electronic
Copies are
Attached as
Appendix 5
Points Enhancement
Category
Number
Enhancement
Points
Total Points
1J The 2023-2031
Housing Element
included Program H-
2d: Workforce
Housing, which calls
for the adoption of a
resolution to
authorize Workforce
Housing
opportunities within
Campbell. Once
established
organizations will be
allowed to use tax-
exempt bonds to
acquire market-rate
apartment buildings
and convert them to
affordable housing
projects for workforce
housing, either in a
specified planning
area (i.e., zone) or
Citywide. As a
Citywide program,
workforce housing
will include
opportunities in
identified
high/highest resource
areas in the City of
Proposed
2023-2031
Housing Element -
Weblink
2023-2031
Housing
Element:
https://www.c
ampbellca.go
v/ArchiveCen
ter/ViewFile/I
tem/2953

2024 HCD
Opportunity
Maps:
https://belon
ging.berkeley
.edu/final-
2024-ctcac-
hcd-
opportunity-
map
1 N/A N/A 0

19.b
Packet Pg. 301
Attachment: Draft Prohousing Designation Application (Prohousing Designation) Category
Number
Concise Written
Description of
Prohousing Policy
Enacted or
Proposed
Documentation
Type (e.g.,
resolution, zoning
code)
Insert Web
Links to
Documents or
Indicate that
Electronic
Copies are
Attached as
Appendix 5
Points Enhancement
Category
Number
Enhancement
Points
Total Points
Campbell as depicted
by the latest 2024
HCD Opportunity
Maps.

Note: This policy, in
addition to 1K as
noted, may also be
considered
contributing toward
Enhancement Factor

7. Further, depending
on the initial number
of potential sites
identified, the City will
decide to advance
with the program or
explore alternative
options. For this
reason, no points are
being pursued in this
category currently.
1K Since its
establishment in
2006, the City of
Campbell's
Inclusionary Housing
Ordinance has led to
approximately 55
housing units being
Enacted
Campbell
Municipal Code -
Weblink
Campbell
Municipal
Code (CMC

21.24)
https://library
.municode.co
m/ca/campb
ell/codes/cod
1 7 1 2

19.b
Packet Pg. 302
Attachment: Draft Prohousing Designation Application (Prohousing Designation) Category
Number
Concise Written
Description of
Prohousing Policy
Enacted or
Proposed
Documentation
Type (e.g.,
resolution, zoning
code)
Insert Web
Links to
Documents or
Indicate that
Electronic
Copies are
Attached as
Appendix 5
Points Enhancement
Category
Number
Enhancement
Points
Total Points
issued certificates of
occupancy for low-
and very low-income
households, with
even more units
approved. Of these
55 units, three were
developed in areas
identified as “Highest
Resource” and “High
Resource” on the
2024 HCD
Opportunity Map. To
enhance the
Ordinance's impact
and increase
affordable housing
opportunities in these
high-resource areas,
the City recently
made key
amendments.

On September 3,
2024, the City
approved updates to
the Ordinance, now
requiring
developments with
five or more units to
allocate 15% of new
e_of_ordinan
ces

2024 HCD
Opportunity
Maps:
https://belon
ging.berkeley
.edu/final-
2024-ctcac-
hcd-
opportunity-
map

Housing
Unit
Production -
2018 to 2023
https://www.c
ampbellca.go
v/Document
Center/View/
23150/1K---
All-Unit-
Production-
2018-to-2023

19.b
Packet Pg. 303
Attachment: Draft Prohousing Designation Application (Prohousing Designation) Category
Number
Concise Written
Description of
Prohousing Policy
Enacted or
Proposed
Documentation
Type (e.g.,
resolution, zoning
code)
Insert Web
Links to
Documents or
Indicate that
Electronic
Copies are
Attached as
Appendix 5
Points Enhancement
Category
Number
Enhancement
Points
Total Points
units for affordable
housing reserved for
low- and very low-
income households.

These changes,
supported by the
Affordable Housing
Nexus Study adopted
on August 20, 2024,
comply with
provisions in
Assembly Bill 602
(2021) and Assembly
Bill 1505 (2017) (see
Nexus Study, Page
11; PDF Page 16).

Together, these
documents affirm that
the updated
Inclusionary Housing
Ordinance does not
create barriers to
housing development
and will facilitate the
construction of
additional affordable
units. Additionally,
the lowered project
size threshold is
expected to increase
the total number of

19.b
Packet Pg. 304
Attachment: Draft Prohousing Designation Application (Prohousing Designation) Category
Number
Concise Written
Description of
Prohousing Policy
Enacted or
Proposed
Documentation
Type (e.g.,
resolution, zoning
code)
Insert Web
Links to
Documents or
Indicate that
Electronic
Copies are
Attached as
Appendix 5
Points Enhancement
Category
Number
Enhancement
Points
Total Points
units, particularly in
“High” and “Highest
Resource” areas,
which often feature
smaller-scale
developments.
1L In 2023, the City of
Campbell established
and filled a new
Housing Manager
position to oversee
the execution of
Housing Element
policies and
programs - many of
which serve to
quantifiably decrease
production
timeframes and
promote the
streamlining of
approval processes.

The Housing
Manager will also
serve as the staff
liaison to a new
Housing
Commission, which
will advise on policy
to further the City's
Housing Element
Enacted
Verification of Hire
- Weblink

Housing
Opportunity Map
Flyer - Weblink
Verification
of Hire
https://www.c
ampbellca.go
v/Document
Center/View/
23162/1L---
Housing-
Manager---
Verification-
of-Hire

Housing
Opportunity
Map Flyer:
https://www.c
ampbellca.go
v/Document
Center/View/
23166/1L---
Housing-
Opportunity-
Site-Flyer
1 2 1 2

19.b
Packet Pg. 305
Attachment: Draft Prohousing Designation Application (Prohousing Designation) Category
Number
Concise Written
Description of
Prohousing Policy
Enacted or
Proposed
Documentation
Type (e.g.,
resolution, zoning
code)
Insert Web
Links to
Documents or
Indicate that
Electronic
Copies are
Attached as
Appendix 5
Points Enhancement
Category
Number
Enhancement
Points
Total Points
goals and objectives
serving the same.

The Housing
Manager also serves
to foster and improve
regional cooperation
across city, county,
and regional
organizations to
achieve shared goals
in housing and utilize
resources (monetary
or otherwise) more
efficiently and
effectively and serves
to support the
promotion of
sustainable, efficient,
and equitable
development
(including through
involvement in the
development of the
City's Climate Action
Plan) - consistent
with state planning
priorities under
Government Code
Section 65041.1.

Further, the City has

19.b
Packet Pg. 306
Attachment: Draft Prohousing Designation Application (Prohousing Designation) Category
Number
Concise Written
Description of
Prohousing Policy
Enacted or
Proposed
Documentation
Type (e.g.,
resolution, zoning
code)
Insert Web
Links to
Documents or
Indicate that
Electronic
Copies are
Attached as
Appendix 5
Points Enhancement
Category
Number
Enhancement
Points
Total Points
created informational
flyers serving to help
summarize and
advertise key details
of Housing
Opportunity Sites in
the City. The
objective of these
handouts is to help
advertise the
properties at
meetings with
market-rate and
affordable-housing
developers to reduce
the amount of time
spend in due
diligence thereby
supporting the
acceleration of
housing production.

Note: This policy may
also be considered
contributing toward
Enhancement Factor

2. 2A In 2023, the City of
Campbell adopted
Chapter 21.39 -
Ministerial Approvals,
Enacted &
Proposed
Campbell
Municipal Code -
Weblink
Chapter

21.39 -
Ministerial
Approvals
3 N/A N/A 3

19.b
Packet Pg. 307
Attachment: Draft Prohousing Designation Application (Prohousing Designation) Category
Number
Concise Written
Description of
Prohousing Policy
Enacted or
Proposed
Documentation
Type (e.g.,
resolution, zoning
code)
Insert Web
Links to
Documents or
Indicate that
Electronic
Copies are
Attached as
Appendix 5
Points Enhancement
Category
Number
Enhancement
Points
Total Points
to the Campbell
Municipal Code. This
Ordinance provides
for ministerial review
and approval of
projects which meet
the requirements
specific in State
Supportive Housing
Law, State Low
Barrier Navigations
Centers Law, and/or
the State Streamlined
Ministerial Approval
process.

Further, the City is
developing an
Ordinance to allow
for the ministerial
approval of all single-
family housing
projects for individual
single-family units, as
well as projects
involving two or more
single-family homes,
in furtherance of
Housing Element
Program H-1g (SB 10
Ordinance) and a
https://library
.municode.co
m/ca/campb
ell/codes/cod
e_of_ordinan
ces?nodeId=
TIT21ZO_C
H21.39MIAP

19.b
Packet Pg. 308
Attachment: Draft Prohousing Designation Application (Prohousing Designation) Category
Number
Concise Written
Description of
Prohousing Policy
Enacted or
Proposed
Documentation
Type (e.g.,
resolution, zoning
code)
Insert Web
Links to
Documents or
Indicate that
Electronic
Copies are
Attached as
Appendix 5
Points Enhancement
Category
Number
Enhancement
Points
Total Points
separate code
update in response to
SB 684 (2023-2024)
for infill development
of 10 homes or less
in multi-family zones.
2B On April 18, 2023,
the City of Campbell
adopted an EIR that
established a
program-level CEQA
analysis and
certification of the
General Plan,
Housing Element,
and related policy
documents.

Enacted
Document -
Weblink; see
Page ES-1
Final
Environmen
tal Impact
Report
https://www.c
ampbellca.go
v/ArchiveCen
ter/ViewFile/I
tem/2904
2 N/A N/A 2
2C Following the
certification of the
City's program-level
EIR for the General
Plan, Housing
Element, and related
documents, the City
operates with the
understanding that
most housing
development projects
will generally be
deemed
"categorically
Enacted

Application Form -
Weblink

Public Record
Center - Weblink

VTA Press
Release - Weblink
Housing
Developmen
t Projects
Application
Checklist
https://www.c
ampbellca.go
v/Document
Center/View/
20230/Housi
ng-
Development
-Projects

2 2 1 3

19.b
Packet Pg. 309
Attachment: Draft Prohousing Designation Application (Prohousing Designation) Category
Number
Concise Written
Description of
Prohousing Policy
Enacted or
Proposed
Documentation
Type (e.g.,
resolution, zoning
code)
Insert Web
Links to
Documents or
Indicate that
Electronic
Copies are
Attached as
Appendix 5
Points Enhancement
Category
Number
Enhancement
Points
Total Points
exempt' from formal
review under the
California
Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA),
excepting only very
large projects (i.e.,
larger than 5 acres)
or those with unusual
conditions (e.g., near
riparian corridors).

This practice is
documented on the
City's application
checklist for Housing
Development
Projects available
online. Further, this
practice has been
demonstrated
through City
approvals of every
housing project since
the adoption of the
Housing Element,
including 330 Virginia
Avenue (PLN-2023-
157), 251 Llewellyn
Avenue (PLN-2023-
164), 54 W. Rincon
Avenue (PLN-2023-
Documente
d/Demonstr
ated
Practice of
Streamlinin
g (Public
Record
Center):
https://camp
bellca.govqa.
us/WEBAPP/
_rs/

VTA Press
Release
https://www.v
ta.org/blog/af
fordable-
housing-
coming-
winchester-
station-
campbell

19.b
Packet Pg. 310
Attachment: Draft Prohousing Designation Application (Prohousing Designation) Category
Number
Concise Written
Description of
Prohousing Policy
Enacted or
Proposed
Documentation
Type (e.g.,
resolution, zoning
code)
Insert Web
Links to
Documents or
Indicate that
Electronic
Copies are
Attached as
Appendix 5
Points Enhancement
Category
Number
Enhancement
Points
Total Points
197), 2400 S.

Winchester
Boulevard (PLN-
2024-29).

Further, the City has
prepared application
checklists to support
the submittal of
projects, such as
those allowed under
AB 2011, which
qualify for ministerial
(by-right) permit
processing and
categorical
exemptions as
authorized under
applicable law. The
City's AB 2011
Checklist has already
helped streamline the
submittal and intake
of a recently
submitted 100%
affordable housing
development project
at the VTA transit
stop located at 2400
S. Winchester
Boulevard (PLN-

19.b
Packet Pg. 311
Attachment: Draft Prohousing Designation Application (Prohousing Designation) Category
Number
Concise Written
Description of
Prohousing Policy
Enacted or
Proposed
Documentation
Type (e.g.,
resolution, zoning
code)
Insert Web
Links to
Documents or
Indicate that
Electronic
Copies are
Attached as
Appendix 5
Points Enhancement
Category
Number
Enhancement
Points
Total Points
2024-29).

These actions
support state
planning priorities
under Government
Code Section
65041.1 by
facilitating efficient,
equitable, and
sustainable
development,
particularly in
addressing
California's critical
need for housing as
described in greater
detail as follows:

Promoting Infill
Development and
Equity: By deeming
most housing
development projects
as "categorically
exempt" under
CEQA, the City
accelerates the
approval process for
new housing within
existing urban areas.

19.b
Packet Pg. 312
Attachment: Draft Prohousing Designation Application (Prohousing Designation) Category
Number
Concise Written
Description of
Prohousing Policy
Enacted or
Proposed
Documentation
Type (e.g.,
resolution, zoning
code)
Insert Web
Links to
Documents or
Indicate that
Electronic
Copies are
Attached as
Appendix 5
Points Enhancement
Category
Number
Enhancement
Points
Total Points
This prioritization of
infill development
helps to combat
urban sprawl,
reduces
environmental
impacts associated
with new
infrastructure
expansion, and
promotes more
equitable access to
housing within the
community. The
streamlined approval
of multiple housing
projects, including
330 Virginia Avenue
and others,
underscores the
City’s commitment to
providing much-
needed housing
stock without delay,
benefitting both low-
and moderate-
income families.

Efficient Use of
Resources and Time:

The City’s

19.b
Packet Pg. 313
Attachment: Draft Prohousing Designation Application (Prohousing Designation) Category
Number
Concise Written
Description of
Prohousing Policy
Enacted or
Proposed
Documentation
Type (e.g.,
resolution, zoning
code)
Insert Web
Links to
Documents or
Indicate that
Electronic
Copies are
Attached as
Appendix 5
Points Enhancement
Category
Number
Enhancement
Points
Total Points
streamlined approach
to CEQA for most
housing projects
helps conserve time
and public resources
that might otherwise
be spent on lengthy
environmental
reviews. By allowing
smaller projects to
proceed without
extensive review—
except in cases of
larger or sensitive
sites—the City
ensures that
resources are
focused on projects
with potential
environmental
impacts while still
advancing critical
housing goals. The
AB 2011 Checklist for
ministerial permit
processing further
underscores this
efficiency by allowing
qualifying affordable
housing projects to
bypass discretionary

19.b
Packet Pg. 314
Attachment: Draft Prohousing Designation Application (Prohousing Designation) Category
Number
Concise Written
Description of
Prohousing Policy
Enacted or
Proposed
Documentation
Type (e.g.,
resolution, zoning
code)
Insert Web
Links to
Documents or
Indicate that
Electronic
Copies are
Attached as
Appendix 5
Points Enhancement
Category
Number
Enhancement
Points
Total Points
review, expediting
the delivery of
housing in high-
demand areas.

Developing Near
Transit for
Sustainable Growth:

The recent project at
2400 S. Winchester
Boulevard, located at
a VTA transit stop,
reflects a key state
planning priority of
promoting transit-
oriented development
(TOD). By facilitating
affordable housing
projects in close
proximity to public
transit, the City
supports sustainable
growth patterns that
reduce dependency
on cars, decrease
greenhouse gas
emissions, and offer
residents convenient
access to
transportation
options. This

19.b
Packet Pg. 315
Attachment: Draft Prohousing Designation Application (Prohousing Designation) Category
Number
Concise Written
Description of
Prohousing Policy
Enacted or
Proposed
Documentation
Type (e.g.,
resolution, zoning
code)
Insert Web
Links to
Documents or
Indicate that
Electronic
Copies are
Attached as
Appendix 5
Points Enhancement
Category
Number
Enhancement
Points
Total Points
approach aligns with
the state’s goals of
reducing vehicle
miles traveled (VMT)
and promoting
sustainable urban
living.

Encouraging
Compact, Transit-
Oriented, and
Sustainable
Development: The
City’s use of by-right
permit processing for
projects qualifying
under AB 2011
further promotes
compact, higher-
density housing. This
policy supports smart
growth by ensuring
housing density near
existing infrastructure
and transit services.

The ease of permit
processing allows
housing to be added
where it can be
accommodated
sustainably, reducing

19.b
Packet Pg. 316
Attachment: Draft Prohousing Designation Application (Prohousing Designation) Category
Number
Concise Written
Description of
Prohousing Policy
Enacted or
Proposed
Documentation
Type (e.g.,
resolution, zoning
code)
Insert Web
Links to
Documents or
Indicate that
Electronic
Copies are
Attached as
Appendix 5
Points Enhancement
Category
Number
Enhancement
Points
Total Points
urban sprawl and
aligning with regional
housing needs.

Providing
Transparency and
Support through
Accessible
Documentation: The
City’s online
application checklist
for Housing
Development
Projects and specific
guidelines for AB
2011-compliant
projects make it clear
and simple for
developers to
understand
requirements. This
transparency and
guidance encourage
compliance, enhance
collaboration
between the City and
housing developers,
and support timely
project delivery. By
making this
information easily

19.b
Packet Pg. 317
Attachment: Draft Prohousing Designation Application (Prohousing Designation) Category
Number
Concise Written
Description of
Prohousing Policy
Enacted or
Proposed
Documentation
Type (e.g.,
resolution, zoning
code)
Insert Web
Links to
Documents or
Indicate that
Electronic
Copies are
Attached as
Appendix 5
Points Enhancement
Category
Number
Enhancement
Points
Total Points
accessible, the City
upholds a fair and
efficient process,
promoting equitable
housing opportunities
across the
community.
2D On April 18, 2023,
the City of Campbell
adopted a new
Zoning Code which
removed the City's
longstanding Site and
Architectural Review
permit process
(which required an
additional public
hearing) in favor of a
streamlined permit
process which allows
housing development
projects to be
decided ministerially,
administratively by
the Community
Development
Director, or by the
Planning
Commission in a
single public hearing.

The City's ministerial
Enacted
Campbell
Municipal Code -
Weblink

City Council Staff
Report - Weblink

Campbell
Municipal
Code
https://library
.municode.co
m/ca/campb
ell/codes/cod
e_of_ordinan
ces

City Council
Report
Adopting
AH Overlay
(reference
page 96):
https://www.c
ampbellca.go
v/AgendaCe
nter/ViewFile
/Agenda/_04
022024-2896
2 N/A N/A 2

19.b
Packet Pg. 318
Attachment: Draft Prohousing Designation Application (Prohousing Designation) Category
Number
Concise Written
Description of
Prohousing Policy
Enacted or
Proposed
Documentation
Type (e.g.,
resolution, zoning
code)
Insert Web
Links to
Documents or
Indicate that
Electronic
Copies are
Attached as
Appendix 5
Points Enhancement
Category
Number
Enhancement
Points
Total Points
permit process
results in project
approvals well within
four months - as
demonstrated by the
City's ministerial
approval of the 2400
S. Winchester
Boulevard (PLN-
2024-29) project
which took a total of
86 days of staff time
to approve from the
date of application
submittal and only 56
days (June 20, 2024
to August 15, 2024)
from the date the City
determined the
project was
consistent with the
City's requirements.

As an additional
example, 54 W.

Rincon Avenue
(PLN-2023-197),
which was processed
through an
administrative action
of the Community
Development

19.b
Packet Pg. 319
Attachment: Draft Prohousing Designation Application (Prohousing Designation) Category
Number
Concise Written
Description of
Prohousing Policy
Enacted or
Proposed
Documentation
Type (e.g.,
resolution, zoning
code)
Insert Web
Links to
Documents or
Indicate that
Electronic
Copies are
Attached as
Appendix 5
Points Enhancement
Category
Number
Enhancement
Points
Total Points
Director, took a total
of 54 days of staff
time to approve from
the date of
application submittal
and only 18-days of
project completeness
(April 4, 2024 to April
22, 2024).

Further, as part of the
City's recently
adopted AH Overlay,
the City provides for
ministerial permit
processing for deeply
affordable housing
projects, which
provides for review
and approval of
qualifying projects in
as few as 60-days.

Note: This policy may
also be considered
contributing toward
Enhancement Factor

1. 2E On April 18, 2023,
the City eliminated
public hearing
Enacted
Campbell
Municipal Code -
Weblink
Campbell
Municipal
Code -
2 N/A N/A 2

19.b
Packet Pg. 320
Attachment: Draft Prohousing Designation Application (Prohousing Designation) Category
Number
Concise Written
Description of
Prohousing Policy
Enacted or
Proposed
Documentation
Type (e.g.,
resolution, zoning
code)
Insert Web
Links to
Documents or
Indicate that
Electronic
Copies are
Attached as
Appendix 5
Points Enhancement
Category
Number
Enhancement
Points
Total Points
processes for
housing development
projects consistent
with zoning and the
general plan for
projects involving
four or fewer units.

Separately, the City
removed its
requirement for Site
and Architectural
review for all other
housing development
permits, and allows
for the vast majority
of all permit requests
to be decided in a
single public hearing.

Examples of this
policy in practice is
demonstrated
through the City's
ministerial approval
of the 2400 S.

Winchester
Boulevard (PLN-
2024-29) project as
well as its
administrative
approval of 54 W.

City Council Staff
Report - Weblink
Chapter

21.07 (Housing
Developmen
t
Regulations
https://library
.municode.co
m/ca/campb
ell/codes/cod
e_of_ordinan
ces?nodeId=
TIT21ZO_C
H21.07HOD
ERE

City Council
Report
(April 18,
2023):
https://www.c
ampbellca.go
v/AgendaCe
nter/ViewFile
/Agenda/_04
182023-2713

19.b
Packet Pg. 321
Attachment: Draft Prohousing Designation Application (Prohousing Designation) Category
Number
Concise Written
Description of
Prohousing Policy
Enacted or
Proposed
Documentation
Type (e.g.,
resolution, zoning
code)
Insert Web
Links to
Documents or
Indicate that
Electronic
Copies are
Attached as
Appendix 5
Points Enhancement
Category
Number
Enhancement
Points
Total Points
Rincon Avenue
(PLN-2023-197)
which were both
were decided without
a public hearing
through the City's
new streamlined
permit process.

As part of the City’s
commitment to
addressing housing
affordability, we have
launched an
"express" plan check
process for
accessory dwelling
units (ADUs) and
junior accessory
dwelling units
(JADUs). ADUs and
JADUs are widely
recognized, including
as part of the City's
2023-2031 Housing
Element, as a key
housing solution for
lower-income
households due to
their typically smaller
size, lower
construction costs,
Enacted Express Plan
Check - Weblink
City of
Campbell -
Building
Services
https://www.c
ampbellca.go
v/1458/Buildi
ng-Division

Express
Plan Check
Process -
ADUs/JADU
s
https://www.c
ampbellca.go
v/1470/Expre
ss-Plan-
Check
1 N/A N/A 1

19.b
Packet Pg. 322
Attachment: Draft Prohousing Designation Application (Prohousing Designation) Category
Number
Concise Written
Description of
Prohousing Policy
Enacted or
Proposed
Documentation
Type (e.g.,
resolution, zoning
code)
Insert Web
Links to
Documents or
Indicate that
Electronic
Copies are
Attached as
Appendix 5
Points Enhancement
Category
Number
Enhancement
Points
Total Points
and integration into
existing residential
properties, making
them more affordable
compared to
traditional housing
options.

The City of
Campbell's express
plan check process
reduces the plan
check times for
ADUs and JADUs to
just one week, a
significant
improvement over
the standard plan
review process,
which can take 2-3
months. By
streamlining this
process, we are
facilitating the
creation of affordable
housing at an
accelerated pace,
directly aligning with
the criteria of priority
permit processing
and reduced plan

19.b
Packet Pg. 323
Attachment: Draft Prohousing Designation Application (Prohousing Designation) Category
Number
Concise Written
Description of
Prohousing Policy
Enacted or
Proposed
Documentation
Type (e.g.,
resolution, zoning
code)
Insert Web
Links to
Documents or
Indicate that
Electronic
Copies are
Attached as
Appendix 5
Points Enhancement
Category
Number
Enhancement
Points
Total Points
check times for
homes affordable to
lower-income
households.
2F As part of the City’s
commitment to
addressing housing
affordability, we have
launched an
"express" plan check
process for
accessory dwelling
units (ADUs) and
junior accessory
dwelling units
(JADUs). ADUs and
JADUs are widely
recognized, including
as part of the City's
2023-2031 Housing
Element, as a key
housing solution for
lower-income
households due to
their typically smaller
size, lower
construction costs,
and integration into
existing residential
properties, making
them more affordable
Enacted Express Plan
Check - Weblink
City of
Campbell -
Building
Services
https://www.c
ampbellca.go
v/1458/Buildi
ng-Division

Express
Plan Check
Process -
ADUs/JADU
s
https://www.c
ampbellca.go
v/1470/Expre
ss-Plan-
Check
1 N/A N/A 1

19.b
Packet Pg. 324
Attachment: Draft Prohousing Designation Application (Prohousing Designation) Category
Number
Concise Written
Description of
Prohousing Policy
Enacted or
Proposed
Documentation
Type (e.g.,
resolution, zoning
code)
Insert Web
Links to
Documents or
Indicate that
Electronic
Copies are
Attached as
Appendix 5
Points Enhancement
Category
Number
Enhancement
Points
Total Points
compared to
traditional housing
options.

The City of
Campbell's express
plan check process
reduces the plan
check times for
ADUs and JADUs to
just one week, a
significant
improvement over
the standard plan
review process,
which can take 2-3
months. By
streamlining this
process, we are
facilitating the
creation of affordable
housing at an
accelerated pace,
directly aligning with
the criteria of priority
permit processing
and reduced plan
check times for
homes affordable to
lower-income
households.

19.b
Packet Pg. 325
Attachment: Draft Prohousing Designation Application (Prohousing Designation) Category
Number
Concise Written
Description of
Prohousing Policy
Enacted or
Proposed
Documentation
Type (e.g.,
resolution, zoning
code)
Insert Web
Links to
Documents or
Indicate that
Electronic
Copies are
Attached as
Appendix 5
Points Enhancement
Category
Number
Enhancement
Points
Total Points
2G In 2023, the City of
Campbell established
a
consolidated/streamli
ned permit process
for housing
development projects
with the adoption of
Chapter 21.07
(Housing
Development
Regulations) to the
Campbell Municipal
Code.

The provisions of
Chapter 21.07
accomplish this by
reducing the levels of
review (eliminating
public hearings in
many situations) and
approval required for
projects when
consistent with
zoning regulations
and the general plan,
and provides clear
permit processes and
findings for approval
based on objective
Enacted
Campbell MFDDS
- Weblink

Campbell
Municipal Code -
Weblink
Housing
Developmen
t
Regulations
https://library
.municode.co
m/ca/campb
ell/codes/cod
e_of_ordinan
ces?nodeId=
TIT21ZO_C
H21.07HOD
ERE

Campbell
Municipal
Code
(Chapter

21.07)
https://library
.municode.co
m/ca/campb
ell/codes/cod
e_of_ordinan
ces?nodeId=
TIT21ZO_C
H21.07HOD
ERE
1 N/A N/A 1

19.b
Packet Pg. 326
Attachment: Draft Prohousing Designation Application (Prohousing Designation) Category
Number
Concise Written
Description of
Prohousing Policy
Enacted or
Proposed
Documentation
Type (e.g.,
resolution, zoning
code)
Insert Web
Links to
Documents or
Indicate that
Electronic
Copies are
Attached as
Appendix 5
Points Enhancement
Category
Number
Enhancement
Points
Total Points
criteria as well as
findings for approval
that have been
specifically tailored to
housing
developments and
aligned with state
law, including the
Housing
Accountability Act. As
a result, the
simplifying the
application and
approval process into
a single unified
application process.

Since the new permit
processes were
established last year,
approximately nine
(9) housing
development permit
projects, supporting
the development of
roughly 400 new
housing units, have
been applied for, or
approved, through
the City's new

19.b
Packet Pg. 327
Attachment: Draft Prohousing Designation Application (Prohousing Designation) Category
Number
Concise Written
Description of
Prohousing Policy
Enacted or
Proposed
Documentation
Type (e.g.,
resolution, zoning
code)
Insert Web
Links to
Documents or
Indicate that
Electronic
Copies are
Attached as
Appendix 5
Points Enhancement
Category
Number
Enhancement
Points
Total Points
streamlined permit
process.
2H On April 18, 2023,
the City of Campbell
adopted new Multi-
Family Development
and Design
Standards
("MFDDS") which
resulted in significant
changes/modification
s to longstanding
development
standards and
requirements for
multi-family and
mixed-use
development
projects. The MFDDS
also served to
consolidate all
applicable
requirements in one
document (for easier
review and reference
by developers), while
simultaneously
providing for more
predictable
(objective) design
outcomes for
Enacted
Campbell MFDDS
- Weblink

Campbell
Municipal Code -
Weblink
Multi-Family
Developmen
t and
Design
Standards
https://www.c
ampbellca.go
v/ArchiveCen
ter/ViewFile/I
tem/2960

Campbell
Municipal
Code
(Chapter

21.07)
https://library
.municode.co
m/ca/campb
ell/codes/cod
e_of_ordinan
ces?nodeId=
TIT21ZO_C
H21.07HOD
ERE
1 N/A N/A 1

19.b
Packet Pg. 328
Attachment: Draft Prohousing Designation Application (Prohousing Designation) Category
Number
Concise Written
Description of
Prohousing Policy
Enacted or
Proposed
Documentation
Type (e.g.,
resolution, zoning
code)
Insert Web
Links to
Documents or
Indicate that
Electronic
Copies are
Attached as
Appendix 5
Points Enhancement
Category
Number
Enhancement
Points
Total Points
developers and the
community.

Note: This policy may
also be considered
contributing toward
Enhancement Factor

1. 2I All permit
applications (both
pre- and post-
entitlement) are
submitted
electronically through
the City's online
permit platform,
MyGovernmentOnlin
e ("MGO"). Once an
application is
submitted and
payment received,
the applicant is
assigned a project
manager who
coordinates review
and responses from
all departments.

Enacted MGO Application
Portal - Weblink
MGO
Connect -
One-Stop
Application
Portal
https://www.
mgoconnect.
org/cp/projec
t-type-
details/15?Is
ApplicationR
estricted=fals
e&SectionID
=2
1 N/A N/A 1
2J All housing
development project
permits, including
ADUs, JADUS, and
Enacted
Weblink - 2J -
ADU and JADU
Tracker
Screenshot
ADU and
JADU -
Priority
Permit
1 N/A N/A 1

19.b
Packet Pg. 329
Attachment: Draft Prohousing Designation Application (Prohousing Designation) Category
Number
Concise Written
Description of
Prohousing Policy
Enacted or
Proposed
Documentation
Type (e.g.,
resolution, zoning
code)
Insert Web
Links to
Documents or
Indicate that
Electronic
Copies are
Attached as
Appendix 5
Points Enhancement
Category
Number
Enhancement
Points
Total Points
multi-family housing
projects are
prioritized over
project types that are
not subject to "shot
clock" requirements
(e.g., wireless
applications, solar
permits, emergency
standby generators).

The City ensures
priority processing
and reduced plan
check times in two
critical ways. As the
first, the City assigns
permits for new
ADUs/JADUs and
multifamily housing
with a priority permit
type flag in our permit
system. As a second
measure, the City
maintains a
dedicated permit log
specific to ADUs and
JADUs that tracks
staff time by division
on each permit. This
log helps the City

Weblink - 2J -
ADU Permit Types
Screenshot
Tracker
https://www.c
ampbellca.go
v/Document
Center/View/
23174/2J---
ADU-and-
JADU-
Tracker

ADU Permit
Types -
Priority
Permit Flag
https://www.c
ampbellca.go
v/Document
Center/View/
23157/2J---
ADU-Permit-
Types

19.b
Packet Pg. 330
Attachment: Draft Prohousing Designation Application (Prohousing Designation) Category
Number
Concise Written
Description of
Prohousing Policy
Enacted or
Proposed
Documentation
Type (e.g.,
resolution, zoning
code)
Insert Web
Links to
Documents or
Indicate that
Electronic
Copies are
Attached as
Appendix 5
Points Enhancement
Category
Number
Enhancement
Points
Total Points
identify any
inefficiencies and
address them before
they cause a delay in
the permit process
and separately is
used to identify ADU
and JADU permit
types that would
benefit from
streamlining efforts.

As a result of these
efforts, ADUs on
average are
processed 15%
faster (5 days) than
required by state law
on average, and up
to 50% faster (17
days) in select cases
tracked by the
system.
2K The City of Campbell
has a standardized
application form for
all entitlement
applications that
facilities multiple
permit requests as
part of a single-
application submittal.

Enacted
Housing
Development
Projects
Application -
Weblink
Standardize
d Housing
Application
Form
https://www.c
ampbellca.go
v/Document
Center/View/
20230/Housi
1 N/A N/A 1

19.b
Packet Pg. 331
Attachment: Draft Prohousing Designation Application (Prohousing Designation) Category
Number
Concise Written
Description of
Prohousing Policy
Enacted or
Proposed
Documentation
Type (e.g.,
resolution, zoning
code)
Insert Web
Links to
Documents or
Indicate that
Electronic
Copies are
Attached as
Appendix 5
Points Enhancement
Category
Number
Enhancement
Points
Total Points
This practice
eliminates the need
to submit multiple
separate permit
requests to facilitate
a single entitlement
application. Instead a
single permit, and
application checklist,
facilitates all requests
related to a single
entitlement, even
when that request
may span multiple
properties, is
proposed to be
developed in one or
more phases, or
requires permits or
clearances from
multiple divisions
(i.e., Public Works,
Building, Fire,
Planning).
ng-
Development
-Projects
2L The City's online
permit platform,
MyGovernmentOnlin
e ("MGO)" provides
for real time status
updates of permit
applications. The
Enacted Permit Center
Map - Weblink
Interactive
GIS Permit
Center
https://cityofc
ampbell.map
s.arcgis.com/
apps/MapSer
1 N/A N/A 1

19.b
Packet Pg. 332
Attachment: Draft Prohousing Designation Application (Prohousing Designation) Category
Number
Concise Written
Description of
Prohousing Policy
Enacted or
Proposed
Documentation
Type (e.g.,
resolution, zoning
code)
Insert Web
Links to
Documents or
Indicate that
Electronic
Copies are
Attached as
Appendix 5
Points Enhancement
Category
Number
Enhancement
Points
Total Points
MGO platform also
provides notifications
and alerts to project
applicants by email
and/or text, in the
applicant portal, and
also on an Interactive
GIS Permit Center
map that shows the
status of all projects
in the City on an
single user-friendly
map.
ies/index.htm
l?appid=444
b0bc7038b4
56699d9faa5
50a530e2
2N On October 15, 2024,
the City Council
adopted Ordinance
No. 2320, introducing
a streamlined
approach to expedite
the preparation of
technical studies for
new development
projects, including
housing.

This ordinance
replaces the
traditional, time-
intensive process of
issuing a formal
request for proposals
Proposed
City Council Staff
Report - Weblink

City Council
Ordinance No.
2320 - Weblink
City Council
Staff
Report,
October 15,
2024
(Establishin
g Pre-
Qualified
Consultant
Lists – See

https://www.c
ampbellca.go
v/AgendaCe
nter/ViewFile
/Agenda/_10
152024-2990

1 N/A N/A 1

19.b
Packet Pg. 333
Attachment: Draft Prohousing Designation Application (Prohousing Designation) Category
Number
Concise Written
Description of
Prohousing Policy
Enacted or
Proposed
Documentation
Type (e.g.,
resolution, zoning
code)
Insert Web
Links to
Documents or
Indicate that
Electronic
Copies are
Attached as
Appendix 5
Points Enhancement
Category
Number
Enhancement
Points
Total Points
(RFP) for each
project with a pre-
approved, on-call
bench of consultants.

By allowing
applicants to select
qualified consultants
from this bench
before project
submission, the City
eliminates months (1-
2 months minimum)
of potential delays
associated with
advertising, selecting,
and negotiating with
consultants. This
proactive selection
process reduces the
most significant
bottleneck in permit
processing, enabling
faster approvals and
accelerating the
timeline for housing
development projects
across the city.

City Council
Ordinance
No. 2320
http://guadal
upe/WebLink
/DocView.as
px?id=22505
5 3A The Affordable
Housing (AH)
Overlay, reduces the
City's development
Enacted
City Council Staff
Report - Weblink

Screenshot of
City Council
Report (see
page 101)
https://www.c
3 8 1 4

19.b
Packet Pg. 334
Attachment: Draft Prohousing Designation Application (Prohousing Designation) Category
Number
Concise Written
Description of
Prohousing Policy
Enacted or
Proposed
Documentation
Type (e.g.,
resolution, zoning
code)
Insert Web
Links to
Documents or
Indicate that
Electronic
Copies are
Attached as
Appendix 5
Points Enhancement
Category
Number
Enhancement
Points
Total Points
impact fee charged to
fund the construction
and maintenance of
parks, recreational
facilities, and open
space in the
community. between

12.5% and 50% as
an incentive to
deeply affordable
housing development
projects.

As a result of this
program, a 100%
affordable 100-unit
multi-family rental
project would see an
over 1-million dollar
reduction in
development impact
fees, significantly
changing the
feasibility of
development and
helping such projects
to effectively
compete for tax
credits and other
financial support.

Development
Impact Fee
Reductions -
Weblink
ampbellca.go
v/AgendaCe
nter/ViewFile
/Agenda/_04
022024-2896

Reduction
in
Developmen
t Impact
Fees
https://www.c
ampbellca.go
v/Document
Center/View/
23159/3A---
Reduction-in-
Park-In-Lieu-
Fees

19.b
Packet Pg. 335
Attachment: Draft Prohousing Designation Application (Prohousing Designation) Category
Number
Concise Written
Description of
Prohousing Policy
Enacted or
Proposed
Documentation
Type (e.g.,
resolution, zoning
code)
Insert Web
Links to
Documents or
Indicate that
Electronic
Copies are
Attached as
Appendix 5
Points Enhancement
Category
Number
Enhancement
Points
Total Points
The City's reduction
in park in-lieu fees
are an eligible type of
development impact
fee under this
category, unlike the
excluded fees, due to
their different focus
and intent. The
excluded fees
specifically address
the impact of
development on
affordable housing
availability, while
park in-lieu fees are
intended to fund
general public
amenities, such as
parks and
recreational facilities,
which benefit the
entire community
rather than targeting
housing affordability.
3C As part of a
comprehensive
strategy to provide
dedicated resources
for the development
of ADUs and JADUs,
Enacted
ADU Accelerator
& Plans Gallery -
Weblink

Santa Clara
County ADU
ADU
Accelerator
& Plans
Gallery
https://ca.ad
uaccelerator.
2 N/A N/A 2

19.b
Packet Pg. 336
Attachment: Draft Prohousing Designation Application (Prohousing Designation) Category
Number
Concise Written
Description of
Prohousing Policy
Enacted or
Proposed
Documentation
Type (e.g.,
resolution, zoning
code)
Insert Web
Links to
Documents or
Indicate that
Electronic
Copies are
Attached as
Appendix 5
Points Enhancement
Category
Number
Enhancement
Points
Total Points
the City has actively
participated in the
Santa Clara County
Planning
Collaborative
(SCCPC) to support
the creation of the
ADU Accelerator
platform. This online
resource offers a
directory of 54 pre-
approved and/or pre-
designed ADU/JADU
design packages,
providing
homeowners with
readily available and
free-to-use plans that
simplify the process
of building new units.

This initiative not only
benefits the City of
Campbell but also
serves the broader
community by
reducing design
costs and
streamlining the
development
process. In addition
to design resources,
Calculator -
Weblink
org/gallery

Santa Clara
County ADU
Calculator
https://santac
laracounty.a
duaccelerato
r.org/calculat
or

19.b
Packet Pg. 337
Attachment: Draft Prohousing Designation Application (Prohousing Designation) Category
Number
Concise Written
Description of
Prohousing Policy
Enacted or
Proposed
Documentation
Type (e.g.,
resolution, zoning
code)
Insert Web
Links to
Documents or
Indicate that
Electronic
Copies are
Attached as
Appendix 5
Points Enhancement
Category
Number
Enhancement
Points
Total Points
the City has
contributed to the
development of an
online ADU
calculator, which
enables homeowners
to estimate the cost
of building an ADU in
Santa Clara County.

This tool provides
critical financial
insights, helping
property owners
make informed
decisions about ADU
construction.

Together, these
resources aim to
reduce barriers and
offer technical
assistance,
empowering
homeowners to
create ADUs and
JADUs more
efficiently.

Finally, the City of
Campbell has an
adopted Ordinance
which imposes less

19.b
Packet Pg. 338
Attachment: Draft Prohousing Designation Application (Prohousing Designation) Category
Number
Concise Written
Description of
Prohousing Policy
Enacted or
Proposed
Documentation
Type (e.g.,
resolution, zoning
code)
Insert Web
Links to
Documents or
Indicate that
Electronic
Copies are
Attached as
Appendix 5
Points Enhancement
Category
Number
Enhancement
Points
Total Points
restrictive
requirements for
Accessory Dwelling
Units (ADUs) than
may be required,
such as eliminating
all parking
requirements, and
has a pending
Ordinance which, as
drafted, will eliminate
all requirements for
ADU deed restriction
to the extent
permitted by law as
well as even less
restrictive
development
requirements (i.e.,
reduction in setback
requirements).
3D Program H-1m of the
Housing Element,
allows for increases
in residential
densities for
innovative housing
types which have
smaller unit sizes.

This program will
allow for smaller units
Proposed
2023-2031
Housing Element -
Weblink
2023-2031
Housing
Element:
https://www.c
ampbellca.go
v/ArchiveCen
ter/ViewFile/I
tem/2953
1 N/A N/A 1

19.b
Packet Pg. 339
Attachment: Draft Prohousing Designation Application (Prohousing Designation) Category
Number
Concise Written
Description of
Prohousing Policy
Enacted or
Proposed
Documentation
Type (e.g.,
resolution, zoning
code)
Insert Web
Links to
Documents or
Indicate that
Electronic
Copies are
Attached as
Appendix 5
Points Enhancement
Category
Number
Enhancement
Points
Total Points
to count as one-half a
unit for density
calculation - allowing
for more units at
lower costs.

At this time, a draft
Ordinance reflecting
these changes, as
well as other recent
amendments to state
law adopted in the
2024 Legislative
Cycle, have been
drafted and
undergoing internal
review.

Note: This policy may
also be considered
contributing toward
Enhancement Factor

7. 3E On April 18, 2023,
the City of Campbell
adopted
amendments to its
Parking Standards
serving to support the
establishment of
Parking Management
Enacted
Campbell
Municipal Code –
Weblink

General Plan -
Weblink
Campbell
Municipal
Code
(Section

21.28.045)
https://library
.municode.co
m/ca/campb
1 N/A N/A 1

19.b
Packet Pg. 340
Attachment: Draft Prohousing Designation Application (Prohousing Designation) Category
Number
Concise Written
Description of
Prohousing Policy
Enacted or
Proposed
Documentation
Type (e.g.,
resolution, zoning
code)
Insert Web
Links to
Documents or
Indicate that
Electronic
Copies are
Attached as
Appendix 5
Points Enhancement
Category
Number
Enhancement
Points
Total Points
Plans and which
separately allow for
reduced parking
requirements when
carshare programs
are in use (i.e.,
reduction of five
residential parking
spaces for every
carshare parking
space provided).
ell/codes/cod
e_of_ordinan
ces?nodeId=
TIT21ZO_C
H21.28PALO
_21.28.045R

ENUPASPR
E

Campbell
General
Plan
https://www.c
ampbellca.go
v/ArchiveCen
ter/ViewFile/I
tem/2951
3H The City of
Campbell's Density
Bonus Ordinance is
specifically designed
to reduce barriers
beyond existing law,
facilitating the
development of
housing affordable to
lower-income
households. The
Ordinance addresses
several critical
challenges faced by
Enacted
Campbell
Municipal Code -
Weblink

MGO Application
Portal - Weblink
Campbell
Municipal
Code
(Chapter

21.20 –
Density
Bonuses..)
https://library
.municode.co
m/ca/campb
ell/codes/cod
e_of_ordinan
ces?nodeId=
TIT21ZO_C
1 N/A N/A 1

19.b
Packet Pg. 341
Attachment: Draft Prohousing Designation Application (Prohousing Designation) Category
Number
Concise Written
Description of
Prohousing Policy
Enacted or
Proposed
Documentation
Type (e.g.,
resolution, zoning
code)
Insert Web
Links to
Documents or
Indicate that
Electronic
Copies are
Attached as
Appendix 5
Points Enhancement
Category
Number
Enhancement
Points
Total Points
developers, providing
clear guidance on
calculating a density
bonus, an area that
has historically
caused confusion
and delayed project
timelines. By offering
a precise
methodology, the
Ordinance helps
streamline the
development
process, reducing
delays in project
planning and review.

Additionally, the
Ordinance clarifies
how developers can
maximize credit
between the City’s
Inclusionary
Ordinance and the
Density Bonus
Ordinance, ensuring
that overlapping unit
obligations are
efficiently managed.

This provision helps
developers better
H21.20DEB

OOTHOIN

MGO
Connect -
One-Stop
Application
Portal
https://www.
mgoconnect.
org/cp/projec
t-type-
details/15?Is
ApplicationR
estricted=fals
e&SectionID
=2l

19.b
Packet Pg. 342
Attachment: Draft Prohousing Designation Application (Prohousing Designation) Category
Number
Concise Written
Description of
Prohousing Policy
Enacted or
Proposed
Documentation
Type (e.g.,
resolution, zoning
code)
Insert Web
Links to
Documents or
Indicate that
Electronic
Copies are
Attached as
Appendix 5
Points Enhancement
Category
Number
Enhancement
Points
Total Points
navigate regulatory
requirements,
minimizing
administrative
hurdles and
increasing the
feasibility of
affordable housing
projects.

As a further incentive
to promote the
production of housing
for acutely and
extremely low-
income households,
the Ordinance offers
a 30% density bonus
to projects that
allocate 5% or more
of their units to these
income groups. This
incentive directly
targets the creation
of deeply affordable
housing, encouraging
developers to
prioritize units for
lower-income
households and
accelerating the

19.b
Packet Pg. 343
Attachment: Draft Prohousing Designation Application (Prohousing Designation) Category
Number
Concise Written
Description of
Prohousing Policy
Enacted or
Proposed
Documentation
Type (e.g.,
resolution, zoning
code)
Insert Web
Links to
Documents or
Indicate that
Electronic
Copies are
Attached as
Appendix 5
Points Enhancement
Category
Number
Enhancement
Points
Total Points
production of critically
needed housing in
the community.
3L The City's online
permitting software
(MGO) reduces
construction costs by
saving time in permit
review process
(reducing
construction delays)
and by reducing the
hard cost of printing
plans ($3 to $5 per
24x36 sheet of
paper) - even during
construction when
revisions are
identified.

The electronic plan
check process also
facilities faster
inspection services,
as it integrates
scheduling of
appointments with
correction items -
making the process
faster and more
seamless and fully
Enacted MGO Application
Portal - Weblink
MGO
Connect -
One-Stop
Application
Portal
https://www.
mgoconnect.
org/cp/projec
t-type-
details/15?Is
ApplicationR
estricted=fals
e&SectionID
=2
1 N/A N/A 1

19.b
Packet Pg. 344
Attachment: Draft Prohousing Designation Application (Prohousing Designation) Category
Number
Concise Written
Description of
Prohousing Policy
Enacted or
Proposed
Documentation
Type (e.g.,
resolution, zoning
code)
Insert Web
Links to
Documents or
Indicate that
Electronic
Copies are
Attached as
Appendix 5
Points Enhancement
Category
Number
Enhancement
Points
Total Points
accessible from the
field reducing the
total number of
inspections required
and resultant delay
and costs for building
and developing
projects overall.
4B On September 3,
2024, the City
Council adopted
Ordinance No. 2319
which established a
local housing trust
fund to be expended
solely on the
production or
refurbishment of
affordable housing.

As a newly
established fund,
regular contributions
will be provided to
this fund through
impact fees collected
by the City to offset
development
impacts, including
Commercial Linkage
Fees as well as
Inclusionary Housing
Enacted
City Council
Ordinance -
Weblink

City Council Staff
Report (Housing
Fund) - Weblink
City Council
Ordinance
2319
(Establishin
g Local
Housing
Trust Fund)
http://guadal
upe/WebLink
/DocView.as
px?id=21586
6 City Council
Staff Report
- City's
Housing
Fund
Contributio
n (reference