1.5 Within ten (10) days following the final approval hearing for the Project, Applicant or Developer shall sign the approved Conditions of Approval which shall certify that the Applicant or Developer agrees to implement all Conditions of Approval.
1.6 A copy of the signed Conditions of Approval shall be printed onto the first page of the construction drawings.
1.7 Approval of Design Review 23-002 is preliminary only. All final working drawings for construction of each building or structure shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning and Building Departments prior to issuance of building permits.
The development of the property shall conform substantially to the following conditions of approval.
1.8 No Certificate of Occupancy shall be granted until all conditions of approval have been satisfied and approved by the Development Services Director, City Engineer, Chief Building Official, and Fire Chief unless otherwise identified herein.
1.9 The development of the site shall conform to all ordinances, codes, regulations, policies and development design controls pursuant to the Cathedral City Municipal Code taking effect prior to issuance of any building permits.
1.10 All conditions herein shall be met prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit.
1.11 All improvements approved for construction are required to be maintained as to comply substantially with the plans approved for construction, unless modifications are approved by the Director of Community and Economic Development and the Director of Engineering/Public Works. The improvements to be maintained include, but are not limited to, site improvements: parking and walking surfaces, private drainage control facilities, fences/walls, signs, and lights; building and accessory structure improvements; paint colors and other finish materials, roofing materials, mechanical equipment, windows, trellises, canopies, all architectural features, landscaping and landscape irrigation.
SECTION 2 FEES
2.1 The Applicant shall pay all applicable City of Cathedral City fees, charges and other costs as prescribed by City Ordinance, including development impact fees.
Be advised that the fees may change at the time they become due and payable, as permitted by applicable law.
2.2 The Applicant shall reimburse the City for all development entitlement costs that exceeded the filing fee deposit(s). The Applicant shall reimburse the City within ten (10) days of receiving invoice. Notwithstanding, in no event, will a grading or building permit, whichever comes first will be issued, if the City is still due a reimbursement.
2.3 Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the Applicant shall alleviate the negative yearly impact on the City’s General Fund from residential development for police, fire, paramedic, and park maintenance and general services by annexing into Community Facilities District (CFD) No. 2006-1 having an annual special tax equal Design Review DR 23-002, GPA 23-001, CZ 23-001 – The Wren Final Conditions of Approval for City Council
January 8, 2025
to the yearly cost of providing General Fund services as calculated and determined by the City of Cathedral Finance Department.
NOTICE TO APPLICANT: Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d)(1), the 90 day period to protest the imposition of any impact fee, dedication, reservation, or other exaction described in this resolution begins on the effective date of this approval and any such protest must be in a manner that complies with Section 66020(a), and failure to follow this procedure in a timely manner will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void or annul imposition.
The right to protest the fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions does not apply to planning, zoning, grading, or other similar application processing fees or service fees in connection with this project. It further does not apply to any fees, dedication, reservations, or exactions for which the applicant has been given a notice similar to this, nor does it revive challenges to any fees for which the Statute of Limitations has previously expired.
SECTION 3 PLANNING
3.1 If the project is proposed to be constructed in phases, a phasing plan shall be submitted for review and approval. The phasing plan shall outline the approximate construction timeline for buildings, infrastructure, landscaping, open space, common amenities, and other site improvements.
3.2 Prior to issuance of a building or grading permit, whichever comes first, a Final Site Plan showing a pedestrian access gate shall be submitted to Planning for review and approval; this Final Plan shall include the details of the pedestrian access gate including:
a. Location to be shown along the north/northwest section of the 6-foot perimeter wall;
b. A sidewalk shall be constructed from the site and pedestrian gate. Exterior access will be along the shared access road and connect directly to the Date Palm Drive sidewalk;
c. Access design, including the sidewalk and pedestrian gate shall comply with ADA requirements;
3.3 Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Final Landscape Construction Plan, prepared by a licensed landscape architect, and signed by the local water purveyor, shall be submitted to the Planning Department for review and approval. The Final Landscape Construction Plan shall contain the following required information:
a. A title block with sheet number, site address and APNs, date of preparation, and name, address, and phone number of Applicant or Developer on all sheets.
Design Review DR 23-002, GPA 23-001, CZ 23-001 – The Wren Final Conditions of Approval for City Council
January 8, 2025
b. A plant landscape legend, including a specific symbol for each plant species used, size (i.e., caliper, gallon, box, or brown trunk height, and/or quantity) and whether it is deciduous or evergreen.
c. Show use of concrete mow strip between turf and other surfaces. d. Clear indication where landscaping will be used to screen mechanical, electrical, and irrigation equipment.
e. A plant landscape legend, including a specific symbol for each plant species used, size (i.e., caliper, gallon, box, or brown trunk height, and/or quantity) and whether it is deciduous or evergreen.
f. Show all location of mechanical, electrical, and irrigation equipment and landscaping that will screen from public view.
g. A detail showing planter design adjacent to walkways and driveways that is designed to prevent soil and/or decomposed granite from flowing onto walkways and driveways. There shall be a minimum two-inch vertical separation between the pavement and the soil.
h. Plant and tree installation and staking details. Plant and tree installation and staking details that require single trunk trees to be double staked and multitrunk trees to be staked appropriate to the species of tree. i. Details, specifications, and location of all pavers and decorative surface materials used on the site. Samples of crushed rock material or decomposed granite materials shall be submitted to the Planning Department for approval. j. All decorative surface materials shall be approved by the Director of Development Services before issuance of any permits.
k. Landscaping and irrigation shall be provided along the street frontage. l. Landscape plans shall meet the requirements of the City of Cathedral City’s Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance.
m. All plant materials used on the project site shall be those listed in the most recent version of Coachella Valley Water District’s “Lush & Efficient Landscape Gardening in the Coachella Valley”.
n. An Irrigation Plan with equipment details.
3.4 Site landscaping shall comply with the City Design Guidelines and Water Conservation policies and rules regardless of whether the items are illustrated on the Construction Landscape Plans:
a. Plants and trees shall be primarily of drought tolerant species compatible with the desert environment.
b. At least 50% of the trees shall be evergreen species.
Design Review DR 23-002, GPA 23-001, CZ 23-001 – The Wren Final Conditions of Approval for City Council
January 8, 2025
c. All trees in parking lots shall be centered between parking spaces to provide optimal shading.
d. All single trunk trees shall be double staked and multi-trunk trees shall be staked appropriate to the species of tree.
e. Arbor guards shall be installed around trees in turf areas. f. Projects located along major arterials and/or streets shall comply with the street tree requirements of the City’s Design Guidelines. g. Planter areas shall be surrounded by a concrete mow strip or other hard surface.
h. All ground-mounted equipment, such as mechanical, electrical, and irrigation equipment (backflow preventers), shall be located within a landscape planter.
This equipment shall not be located within a turf area and shall not be visible from public view.
i. Any drain that terminates in a planter shall have a splash guard. j. All palm trees shall have a brown trunk height of between a minimum of 10 – 20 feet, varied to the satisfaction of City staff.
k. All 36-inch box trees or greater shall be verified as to size by the project planner prior to being planted. It is the responsibility of the contractor and/or Applicant to make an appointment with the project planner to conduct this verification.
3.5 All landscaping shall be continuously maintained. Trees, shrubs, ground covers, etcetera, shall be watered and permanently maintained. All dead vegetation shall be removed and replaced in a timely manner.
3.6 Where landscaping is required for off-street parking areas, or in other vehicular parking areas, concrete curbing and/or bumper blocks shall be required to regulate vehicular traffic and to protect plant materials from vehicles. Such curbing height shall be at least six inches. Curbing of six inches or more shall be required where a public planter slopes toward a sidewalk and said curbing is needed to retain water. Overflow devices which drain under sidewalks may be required to assure that water does not overflow planters. In no event shall the finished grade of the irrigated planter be less than three inches below a public sidewalk and/or curb.
3.7 The Applicant shall contact the Planning Department 90 days after issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy to arrange for a follow-up on-site inspection to ensure that all plant material is being maintained consistent with the approved Exhibit “A”.
3.8 Redwood headers are specifically prohibited from use on the project site for landscaping or as a permanent condition for other uses.
3.9 All mechanical equipment, either roof or ground mounted, and shall be screened from public view. All such equipment shall be fully screened by the Design Review DR 23-002, GPA 23-001, CZ 23-001 – The Wren Final Conditions of Approval for City Council
January 8, 2025
roof structure, a parapet wall, appropriate ground mounted walls, berming, or landscaping. All walls shall architecturally match the building. If after construction, but prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, it is determined by the Planning Department that equipment can be viewed from the public right-of-way a plan for screening the equipment shall be submitted to the Planning Department for approval. Once approved, said screening shall be constructed prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy.
3.10 Trash enclosures shall be constructed as shown in Exhibit A and to City standards.
3.11 All exterior walls facing a public street or public area shall have a decorative surface and a decorative cap that is consistent with the overall architecture.
3.12 All breaker boxes, fire sprinkler risers, and utility conduits shall be interior to the building.
3.13 All roof drains and downspouts shall be on the interior of the building or within an enclosure that is integrated into the building design as approved by the Planning Department with decorative drain terminations. Exposed drainpipes are specifically prohibited.
3.14 All drain terminations shall be from the Watts Drainage Product RD-940 or a product of equal value.
3.15 Contractor must divert at least 75 percent of all demolition waste to a recycling facility. The reuse of materials is considered an acceptable recycling program but must be documented and approved by the Environmental Conservation Manager.
3.16 Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant shall submit all weight tickets associated with trash and recycling disposal to be approved by the Environmental Conservation Manager.
3.17 Signage is not a part of this approval and shall require a separate Sign Permit.
3.18 The Applicant shall submit an exterior Lighting Plan in compliance with CCMC Chapter 9.89, including a photometric analysis, to the Director of Development Services for review and approval prior to issuance of a building permit. The Lighting Plan shall also identify the following:
a. The type of fixtures, including height, material, and color. b. That the total height of all freestanding lighting fixtures will not exceed eighteen feet (18’).
c. That all concrete fixture bases will have a decorative finish. At a minimum, a trowel finish shall be provided.
d. That the bolts connecting the light fixture to the base will be covered.
Design Review DR 23-002, GPA 23-001, CZ 23-001 – The Wren Final Conditions of Approval for City Council
January 8, 2025
3.19 Property addresses or building identification signs shall be placed on all buildings to be plainly visible from the public street or private drives. Signs shall be a minimum of 12 inches in height on communal buildings and six inches in height for individual dwellings/units. If applicable, numbers shall be internally illuminated.
3.20 The applicant shall fully comply with and meet all operating criteria required pursuant to State Laws, the provisions of this Code, and any specific, additional operating procedures and measures as may be imposed as these conditions of approval, in order to ensure that the operation of the facility is consistent with the protection of the health, safety, and welfare of the community.
3.21 Any and all cables or wiring associated with utilities, shall be installed within the interior of the buildings and shall not be installed on the exterior the buildings.
3.22 Exterior balconies and terraces shall be free of outdoor storage.
3.23 Comply with the following Mitigation Measures in the IS/MND and MMRP a. AIR-1: Should building construction and architectural coatings/painting occur simultaneously, the volatile organic compound (VOC) content should be no greater than 45 grams VOC per liter for interior paint. b. BIO-1: Nesting bird nesting season generally extends from February 1 through September 15 in southern California and specifically, March 15 through August 31 for migratory passerine birds. To avoid impacts to nesting birds (common and special status) during the nesting season, a qualified Avian Biologist will conduct pre-construction Nesting Bird Surveys (NBS) no more than 3-days prior to Project-related disturbance to nestable vegetation to identify any active nests. If no active nests are found, no further action will be required. If an active nest is found, the biologist will set appropriate no-work buffers around the nest which will be based upon the nesting species, its sensitivity to disturbance, nesting stage, and expected types, intensity, and duration of the disturbance. The nests and buffer zones shall be field-checked weekly by a qualified biological monitor. The approved no-work buffer zone shall be clearly marked in the field, within which no disturbance activity shall commence until the qualified biologist has determined the young birds have successfully fledged and the nest is inactive.
c. CUL-1: An approved Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians (ACBCI) Cultural Resource Monitor(s) shall be on-site during any ground disturbing activities (including grubbing, grading and excavation). Should buried cultural deposits be encountered, the Monitor may request that destructive construction halt.
The Monitor shall notify a Qualified Archaeologist (Secretary of the Interior’s Standards and Guidelines) to investigate and, if necessary, prepare a mitigation plan for submission to the State Historic Preservation Officer and the Agua Caliente Tribal Historic Preservation Office.
d. NOI-1: Consistent with the General Plan Land Use Compatibility Matrix and prior to issuance of grading permit, a detailed sound attenuation study is necessary to verify the Project will achieve a minimum 25 dBA interior noise Design Review DR 23-002, GPA 23-001, CZ 23-001 – The Wren Final Conditions of Approval for City Council
January 8, 2025
reduction, specifically for apartment homes located adjacent to Date Palm Drive.
Design Review DR 23-002, GPA 23-001, CZ 23-001 – The Wren Final Conditions of Approval for City Council
January 8, 2025
SECTION 4 ENGINEERING / PUBLIC WORKS
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
4.1 The Applicant agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of Cathedral City (“city”), its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action or proceeding to attack, set aside, void, or annul the approval of this Design Review DR No. 23-002 (DR), Change of Zone 23-001, General Plan Amendment GPA 23-001 and Entitlement Plans (Plans). The city will have sole discretion in selecting its defense counsel. The city will promptly notify the Applicant of any claim, action or proceeding and will cooperate fully in the defense.
4.2 The DR shall expire two years after the City Planning Commission approval date, unless granted a completed Building Permit application and/or a time extension pursuant to Cathedral City Ordinance 659; Section 3; Paragraph 8.4(A).
4.3 The DR will comply with all applicable terms, conditions and/or mitigation measures for the following approvals:
i. DR No. 23-002.
ii. Change of Zone 23-001.
iii. GPA 23-001.
iv. Cathedral City Design Guidelines.
v. Cathedral City Water Conservation Policies and Rules. vi. Cathedral City Municipal Codes and Ordinances.
In the event of any conflict(s) between the above provisions for these conditions or approvals, the Applicant will notify the Director of Public Works and/or the Director of Community and Economic Development to determine precedence.
4.4 References to:
i. The Wren by reference includes the following parcel of DR 23-002 as shown in Exhibit A as part of these Conditions of Approval:
1. APN 670-110-043.
ii. Phase II (Rosemount Storage) by reference includes the following parcels of SPA 99-58A Planning Unit 4, Phase II as shown in Exhibit A as part of these Conditions of Approval:
1. APN 670-110-049.
2. APN 670-110-050.
3. APN 670-110-051.
4. APN 670-110-052.
Design Review DR 23-002, GPA 23-001, CZ 23-001 – The Wren Final Conditions of Approval for City Council
January 8, 2025
Note: Development of the first parcel within Phase II initiates requirements outlined for Phase II as cited in these Conditions of Approval.
iii. Grocery Shopping center by reference includes the following parcel as shown in Exhibit A as part of these Conditions of Approval:
1. APN 678-160-022 (grocery shopping center).
4.5 All conditions herein will be met prior to the Building, Grading or Encroachment Permit (Permit) issuance for the DR or as specifically modified by item as linked to a Certificate of Occupancy (COO) issuance and/or issuance of the Permit and/or time limit from the date of either of the aforementioned COO or Permit.
4.6 References:
i.To “approved by the city” include the following city staff to be contacted as applicable to the specific approval:
1. The Director of Public Works, or
2. The Director of Community and Economic Development, or
3. The City Engineer, or
4. Chief Building Official.
ii. “The Intersection” defines the full four-way traffic signalized intersection and all related improvements from 10 feet prior and 10 feet beyond the south, north, west and east corner end of returns at the intersection of Date Palm Drive and Rosemount Road including all intersection improvements, respectively; and the full median improvements, northbound to westbound and southbound to eastbound, to make “The Intersection” complete, as generally outlined in Conditions of Approval paragraph 4.39.
1. “The Intersection” includes the participation of the following properties:
a. Phase II (Rosemount Storage).
b. The Wren (APN 670-110-043).
c. APN 678-160-022 (grocery shopping center).
iii. The “Rosemount Storage-Wren Cooperation” defines cooperative participation in the construction of the 13-ft wide and 275-foot-long (including bay taper) northbound to eastbound deceleration lane approaching the Date Palm Drive and Rosemount Road intersection; and improvements east of “The Intersection” along Rosemount Road to the Phase II’s northeast property corner.
1. The “Rosemount Storage-Wren Cooperation” includes the participation of the following properties:
a. Phase II (Rosemount Storage).
b. APN 670-110-043 (The Wren).
Design Review DR 23-002, GPA 23-001, CZ 23-001 – The Wren Final Conditions of Approval for City Council
January 8, 2025
4.7 Prior to the issuance of any grading, construction or building permit by the city, the Applicant will obtain any necessary clearances and/or permits from the following agencies, where required:
i. City of Cathedral City Fire Marshal.
ii. Cathedral City Public Works Department.
iii. Cathedral City Development Services Department.
iv. Riverside County Environmental Health Department.
v. Palm Springs Unified School District (PSUSD).
vi. Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD).
vii. Southern California Edison (SCE).
viii. Frontier Communications.
ix. Spectrum Cable.
x. Riverside County Airport Land Use Commission (RCALUC). xi. California Regional Water Quality Control Board (CRWQCB). xii. State Water Resources Control Board.
xiii. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).
xiv. Sunline Transit Agency (SunLine).
xv. South Coast Air Quality Management District – Coachella Valley (SCAQMD).
The Applicant is responsible for all the requirements for the permits and/or clearances from the above-listed agencies. When the requirements include approval of improvement plans, the Applicant will furnish proof of such approvals when submitting those improvement plans for city approval.
4.8 Approval of the DR will not be construed as approval for any horizontal and/or vertical dimensions implied by the Plans or exhibits unless specifically identified in the following Conditions of Approval.
4.9 The Applicant will reimburse the city, within thirty (30) days of presentation of the invoice, all costs and actual attorney fees incurred by the City Attorney to prepare, review, negotiate and/or modify any documents or instruments required by these conditions and/or subsequent modification requests to these Conditions of Approval. This obligation will be paid in the time noted above without deduction or offset and the Applicant’s failure to make such payment will be a material breach of the Conditions of Approval.
4.10 The Applicant will reimburse the city, within thirty (30) days of presentation of the invoice, all cost and actual consultant’s fees incurred by the city for engineering, surveying and/or any other technical consultants to review and/or modify any documents or instruments required by these conditions and/or subsequent modification requests. This obligation will be paid in the time noted above without deduction or offset and the Applicant’s failure to make such payment will be a material breach of the Conditions of Approval.
Design Review DR 23-002, GPA 23-001, CZ 23-001 – The Wren Final Conditions of Approval for City Council
January 8, 2025
4.11 The Applicant will reimburse the city, within thirty (30) days of presentation of the invoice, all actual costs incurred by the city for Public Works and/or Community and Economic Development Departments reviews and/or modify any documents or instruments required by these conditions and/or subsequent modification requests. This obligation will be paid in the time noted above without deduction or offset and the Applicant’s failure to make such payment will be a material breach of the Conditions of Approval.
REAL PROPERTY
4.12 Prior to issuance of any permit(s), the Applicant will acquire or confer easements and other property rights necessary for the construction or proper functioning of the DR. Conferred rights will include irrevocable offers to dedicate or grant access easements to the city for emergency services, maintenance, construction, and reconstruction of essential improvements.
4.13 Pursuant to the condition, conferred rights will also include approvals from all necessary persons or entities over easements and other property rights necessary for construction and proper functioning of the proposed DR, not limited to access rights over proposed and/or existing private streets that access public streets and open space/drainage facilities of all phases of the DR. Specifically:
i. If utility easements exist where the proposed DR is proposed, in accordance with the provisions of the City Municipal Code and prior to DR approval, these easements will either be quitclaimed or terminated by their owners, or the city will be provided with “non-interference” letters from the easement owners stating that the Applicant’s proposed DR will not interfere with their easements.
ii. Special note: Immediately after entitlement of the southerly abutting Phase II (Rosemount Storage) or if the entitlement of The Wren (APN 670-110-043) occurs first, the Owner of Record of the Phase II (Rosemount Storage) will dedicate to the City an additional 13-feet of right of way along the Phase II (Rosemount Storage) west frontage located on the east side of Date Palm Drive to accommodate a 275-footlong deceleration lane (including bay taper) approaching Rosemount Road as generally shown on the Phase II (Rosemount Storage) Project Plans. The deceleration lane improvements are subject to the fair share reimbursement described in the Rosemount Storage-Wren Cooperation” section of these Conditions of Approval.
iii. The Owner of Record for will be responsible for blowsand, debris, trash, rubbish and deleterious material removal in all areas of the DR’s parking lots and Date Palm Drive and Rosemount Drive frontage areas, including gutter pans, sidewalks, parkways, drive aisles (interior and northerly connector), entry areas and all interior areas within walled areas and all other areas outside walled areas the DR.
Design Review DR 23-002, GPA 23-001, CZ 23-001 – The Wren Final Conditions of Approval for City Council
January 8, 2025
The Owner of Record will also be responsible for the daily maintenance of the interior and exterior (right of way frontage) landscaping continually in a condition to COO or better (matured), including the entering into of a Landscaping Maintenance Agreement, which includes improvement securities as cited further in Condition 4.66 of these Conditions of Approval.
The Owner of Record will include these responsibilities in the daily maintenance of the site for perpetuity and will record a Maintenance Covenant, inclusive of all items cited above, on the DR parcel. iv. The Owner of Record will record a mutual access easement between the DR parcel and northerly APN 670-110-042, for access to Date Palm Drive and 30th Avenue as shown on the Plans, subject to the approval of the city.
v. The Owner of Record of the DR will offer dedication to the city those easements necessary for access to drainage facilities and basins and execute and record separate Drainage System and Basin Covenants with the city prior to issuance of the first COO.
4.14 Right of way dedications may include additional widths as necessary for dedicated right and left turn lanes, bus turnouts, parking, gated entry areas and other features contained in the proposed DR.
4.15 The Applicant will retain for private use the DR’s parking lots, alleys, access ways, entry areas and rights of way in conformance with the Cathedral City General Plan, Municipal Code and/or as required by the city.
4.16 When the city determines that access rights to a proposed street right-of-way shown on the DR’s Plans are necessary prior to the issuance of the COO, the Owner of Record will grant the necessary rights-of-way within 60 days of a written request by the city.
4.17 Where applicable, where public facilities (e.g. sidewalks) are placed on privately owned setbacks, the Owner of Record shall offer for dedication blanket easements for those purposes by separate instrument prior to the issuance of the first COO.
4.18 For drainage facilities and basins, the Owner of Record will provide the city with those easements necessary for access to drainage facilities and basins within the DR. The Owner of Record is also required to execute and record a separate Drainage System and Basin Covenant with the city prior to issuance of the Grading Permit.
Design Review DR 23-002, GPA 23-001, CZ 23-001 – The Wren Final Conditions of Approval for City Council
January 8, 2025
4.19 The Applicant shall cause all missing property corners and survey monuments within the boundaries of the DR to be set and file the required Record of Survey prior to the issuance of the COO as cited in Condition 4.70 of these Conditions of Approval.
4.20 The Applicant will furnish proof of easements, or written permission, as appropriate, from those owners of all abutting properties on which, and not limited to, grading, wall construction, retaining wall construction, permanent slopes, street improvements, sidewalks, driveways, utility relocations, other encroachments and other construction activities will occur. i. Further, all abutting properties disturbed by the Applicants, and not limited to, grading, wall construction, retaining wall construction, permanent slopes, street improvements, sidewalks, driveways, utility relocations, other encroachments and other construction activities performed by the Applicant, will be restored to original and/or improved conditions subject to city inspection.
4.21 The Applicant shall cause no easement to be granted, or recorded, over any portion of the subject property between the date of approval the DR and the date of issuance of the first COO, unless such easement is approved by the city.
4.22 The Applicant will be responsible for the vacation, quitclaim or granting of easements that address changes in the existing easements over the proposed DR that may be affected by the proposed improvements. Pursuant to this Condition, the Applicant will apply to the city for any street vacation request of public right-of-way and/or utility easements. The Applicant must provide all applicable exhibits and legal descriptions and perform all necessary abandonments or relocation of easements and/or facilities as required by all affected utility purveyors over the public rights-of-way and/or utility easements.
Typically, the right-of-way vacation process may take up to three (3) months to complete.
PHASE I, SWPPP, STORMWATER AND NPDES REQUIREMENTS
4.23 The Applicant, where applicable, will be responsible for completing all DR approved Phase I Study, city, Riverside County and Riverside County Department of Environmental Health requirements, respectively. Proof of compliance will be submitted to the city before issuance of any permit for the DR.
4.24 Coverage under the State of California Construction General Permit must be obtained by the Applicant, who then will submit a copy of the Regional Water Quality Control Board’s (“RWQCB”) acknowledgement of the applicant’s Notice of Intent (“NOI”) and Waste Discharge Identification (“WDID”) number to the city prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit.
Design Review DR 23-002, GPA 23-001, CZ 23-001 – The Wren Final Conditions of Approval for City Council
January 8, 2025
Prior to construction, during construction and up to DR acceptance, the Applicant will comply with applicable provisions of the city’s NPDES Stormwater Discharge Permit and Riverside County Ordinance No. 457; the California Regional Water Quality Control Board – Colorado River Basin Regional Board Order No. R7- 2013-0011 and the State Water Resources Control Board’s Order No. 2009-009- DWQ, Order No. 2010-0014-DWQ and Order No. 2012-0006-DWQ. i. For construction activities including clearing, grading or excavation of land that disturbs one (1) acre or more of land, or that disturbs less than one (1) acre of land, but which is a part of a construction project that encompasses more than one (1) acre of land, the Applicant (“Permitee”) will be required to submit a Storm Water Pollution Protection Plan (“SWPPP”) to the State Water Resources Control Board (“SWRCB”). ii. The Applicant or design professional can obtain the California Stormwater Quality Association SWPPP template at www.cabmphandbooks.com for use in their SWPPP preparation.
iii. Prior to the Applicant submitting the SWPPP to the SWRCB, the Applicant will submit a copy of the SWPPP to the city for review. iv. The Applicant will deliver a complete copy of the State Water Resources Control Board approved SWPPP to the city prior to issuance of the Grading Permit for city records.
v. The Applicant will ensure that the required SWPPP is always available for inspection on the project site through and including acceptance of all improvements by the city.
vi. The Applicant’s SWPPP will include provisions for all of the following Best Management Practices (“BMPs”), but not limited to:
1. Temporary soil stabilization (erosion control).
2. Temporary sediment control.
3. Wind erosion control.
4. Track out control.
5. Non-storm water management.
6. Waste management and materials pollution control.
7. Retention and infiltration basins management.
vii. All erosion and sediment control BMPs proposed by the Applicant will be approved by the city prior to implementation.
viii. All erosion control BMPs will remain in effect for the entire duration of project construction until all improvements are completed and accepted by the city.
ix. The SWPPP will remain in effect for the entire duration of project construction until all improvements are completed and accepted by the city.
4.25 The Applicant’s DR PM-10 and erosion control plans (separate plans) will include provisions for all the above cited Best Management Practices (“BMPs”).
4.26 This DR will comply with the Cathedral City Floodplain Management Ordinance §8.24.
Design Review DR 23-002, GPA 23-001, CZ 23-001 – The Wren Final Conditions of Approval for City Council
January 8, 2025
4.27 The Applicant will design and construct facilities to capture all onsite nuisance and stormwater, with breakout facilities, within the paved and landscaped areas of the DR, per Cathedral City Municipal Code §8.24 requirements and other conditions generally shown on the DR’s Plans and submitted in the DR’s Preliminary Hydrology Report.
4.28 Final stormwater handling will conform to a final approved Hydrology Study for the DR. The design of the Project will not cause any increase in flood boundaries, levels, or frequencies in any area outside the DR.
4.29 Stormwater and nuisance water (drainage) for the DR will be retained on site and will be disposed of in an approved manner. Nuisance water shall be disposed of via on-site storm drains, catch basins, underground percolation piping, retention basin(s) and/or a combination of the aforementioned (as generally shown on the DR’s Plans) as approved by the city.
All retention systems will be designed for full containment of the 100 year-3-hour storm event. All infiltration rates used in calculations for said retention basins or underground systems will conform to the DR’s Geotechnical Infiltration Reports or no more than 2-inches per hour (2.0”/hr.), whichever is less. All proposed infiltration locations will be at the proposed bottom of the retention basin and/or underground retention system elevation.
The minimum precipitation frequency rate utilized for the 100 year-3-hour storm event shall be at the current rate published by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and RCFCD and approved by the city. All flows for the proposed drainage system (catch basins, piping, etc.) will be calculated utilizing the largest flow rate of the 100-year storm event (1 - hour, 3 - hour, 6 - hour or 24 - hour).
4.30 Stormwater and nuisance water (drainage) will be disposed of via on-site storm drains, new and existing catch basins, underground percolation piping chambers, dry wells and retention basin(s) as approved by the city.
4.31 Storm water drainage historically received from adjoining properties will be received and retained and/or passed though into the historic downstream drainage relief route.
4.32 The Applicant will comply with applicable provisions for post construction runoff per the Cathedral City’s NPDES Stormwater Discharge Permit; Riverside County Ordinance No. 457; the Californian Regional Water Quality Control Board – Colorado River Basin (CRWQCB-CRB) Regional Board Order No. R7-2013-0011 and the State Water Resources Control Board’s Order No. 2010-0014-DWQ and Order No. 2012-0006-DWQ.
Design Review DR 23-002, GPA 23-001, CZ 23-001 – The Wren Final Conditions of Approval for City Council
January 8, 2025
i. For post-construction, urban runoff from New Development and Redevelopment Projects, the Applicant will implement requirements of the NPDES permit for the design, construction and the covenants for the perpetual operation and maintenance of BMPs per the approved revised/updated Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for the project as require by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board – Colorado River Basin (CWQRCB- CRB) Region Board Order No. R7- 2013-0011.
ii. The Applicant will implement the revised/updated WQMP Design Standards per (CRWQCB-CRB) Region Board Order No. R7-2013-0011 utilizing BMPS approved by the city.
iii. The Owner of Record will execute and record a Water Quality Management Plan and Urban Runoff Best Management Practices Transfer, Access and Maintenance Covenant with the city (as part of the WQMP) on the DR prior to the issuance of the first COO.
4.33 Open retention/infiltration basins will be designed as follows:
i. The minimum slopes accepted without security fencing will be 3:1. ii. Slopes will be lined with 3-inch to 6-inch angular rock over weed block. iii. The bottom will not be rock lined or landscaped.
iv. Landscaping will be allowed on the top bench.
v. A maintenance access route to the bottom of the retention basin will be provided.
vi. A basin elevation monument with a visible base elevation marker will be installed at the bottom of each retention basin to allow for drive by visual inspections.
4.34 Underground storage basins will be designed as follows:
i. Storage capacity will be calculated from the open internal capacity of the pipe and/or chamber.
ii. Rock and gravel bedding material in the foundation, haunch zone, side and top areas will not be included in the storage capacity area. iii. Pipe material and bedding will be shown on the engineering Plans subject to approval by the city.
iv. All chambers will have accessible ports for maintenance subject to approval by the city.
OFFSITE PUBLIC ROADWAYS
4.35 All traffic impacts and mitigations will be in conformance to the city accepted “The Wren Transportation Analysis” prepared by Integrated Engineering Group, July 2024.
Design Review DR 23-002, GPA 23-001, CZ 23-001 – The Wren Final Conditions of Approval for City Council
January 8, 2025
4.36 Date Palm Drive information – a General Plan designated Arterial Highway (A) roadway is to be designed to a minimum of 126 foot wide right of way to right of way (63 feet wide half right of way) and a curb-to-curb width of 94 feet (47-foot half street).
i. Date Palm Drive is currently constructed with a centerline of improvements width to east curb of 43 feet wide.
1. The Applicant will widen Date Palm Drive from the centerline of improvements to the east curb to a width of 47 feet (4 feet widening). The street widening will be completed with curb, gutter and 8-foot-wide sidewalk to be shown on the engineering Plans.
2. If Phase II (Rosemount Storage) has not initiated construction, the Applicant will widen Date Palm Drive 60 feet from the centerline of improvements to the east curb in the areas of the 13-foot-wide and 275-foot-long (including the bay taper and storage) Rosemount Road approach deceleration lane completed with curb and gutter to be shown on the engineering Plans. Note: these improvements are subject to the fair share reimbursement described in the Rosemount Storage-Wren Cooperation” section of these Conditions of Approval.
ii. There will be “no parking” allowed on Date Palm Drive frontage. iii. An 8-foot-wide curb adjacent sidewalk on the DR’s Date Palm Drive frontage will be constructed connecting to existing sidewalks north and south of the DR.
iv. The Applicant will design and construct the following public street corner DR improvements at the Date Palm Drive and Rosemount Road intersection:
1. Remove and replace the existing corner, cross gutter, spandrel and ADA corner ramp at the DR’s southwest corner at the northeast corner of the intersection of Date Palm Drive and Rosemount Road with new city approved street corner, cross gutter, spandrel and ADA corner ramp to be shown on the DR Plans as approved by the city.
2. If The Wren is developed prior to the development of southerly abutting Phase II (Rosemount Storage), the Applicant will remove and replace the existing corner, cross gutter, spandrel and ADA corner ramp at the southeast corner of the intersection of Date Palm Drive and the Rosemount Road with new city approved street corner, cross gutter, spandrel and ADA corner ramp to be shown on the DR’s Plans as approved by the city. Note: these
improvements are subject to the fair share reimbursement described in “The Intersection” in these Conditions of Approval Section 4.39.
Design Review DR 23-002, GPA 23-001, CZ 23-001 – The Wren Final Conditions of Approval for City Council
January 8, 2025
4.37 Rosemount Road information – a General Plan designated Residential Collector roadway is to be designed to a minimum of 60 foot wide right of way to right of way (30 feet wide half right of way) and a curb-to-curb width of 50 and 40 feet (25- and 20-foot half street, respectively).
i. Rosemount Road is currently unimproved along Applicant’s DR southern frontage.
1. The Applicant will construct full frontage improvements on the DR’s southern frontage (north side of Rosemount Road) to include curb, gutter and 5-foot-wide sidewalk.
2. The Applicant will construct an approximately 50-foot-wide commercial access driveway along the DR’s southern frontage, with the centerline generally lining up with the future southerly abutting Phase II (Rosemount Storage) entrance driveway, with the final width and location as generally shown on the DR’s Plans.
3. The Applicant will construct one of the following:
a. If The Wren is developed after the development of southerly abutting Phase II (Rosemount Storage), the Applicant will construct a.c. pavement improvements of a width necessary to complete the Rosemount Road frontage improvements
from “The Intersection” to the east existing curb and gutter improvements at the southeastern corner of the DR subject to the approval of the city. Note: these improvements are subject to the fair share reimbursement described in the Rosemount Storage-Wren Cooperation” section in these
Conditions of Approval paragraph 4.38.iv below.
b. If The Wren is developed prior to the development of southerly abutting Phase II (Rosemount Storage) Project, the Applicant will construct a.c. pavement improvements 48 feet wide from the DR’s south frontage improvements (curb, gutter and sidewalk) starting from the Date Palm Drive and Rosemount Road intersection cross gutter to the DR south frontage Rosemount Road access driveway then tapering
easterly to 38 feet wide to the Phase II (Rosemount Storage) Project’s eastern property line connecting to the existing curb and gutter improvements at that easterly location
subject to the approval of the city. All a.c. paving work southerly of the Rosemount Road centerline within the
above cited limits will be subject to the “Rosemount StorageWren Cooperation” described in the “Rosemount StorageWren Cooperation” section in these Conditions of Approval paragraph 4.38.iv below.
c. The Applicant will reconstruct full north half street paving improvements along the DR’s southern frontage continuing from the easterly terminus of the abutting Phase II
(Rosemount Storage) Project paving improvements to the
southeast corner of the DR subject to the approval of the Design Review DR 23-002, GPA 23-001, CZ 23-001 – The Wren Final Conditions of Approval for City Council
January 8, 2025
city. Note: this described a.c. paving work and respective street frontage improvements are not subject to the
“Rosemount Storage-Wren Cooperation.”
ii. There will be “no parking” allowed on Rosemount Road frontage westerly of Sierra Place.
iii. A 5-foot-wide curb adjacent sidewalk, transitioning to an off the curb sidewalk, east of the southerly abutting Phase II (Rosemount Storage) Project, on the DR’s Rosemount Road frontage will be constructed connecting to existing sidewalks west and east of the DR. iv. “Rosemount Storage-Wren Cooperation” is the cooperative participation in the construction of Rosemount Road east of “The Intersection” cited in Conditions of Approval 4.39.
1. If The Wren Rosemount Road required improvements are constructed prior to the southerly abutting Phase II (Rosemount Storage) improvements along the same Rosemount Road frontage, all work south of the centerline of improvements along the Wren’s west to east frontage will be subject to 50% fair share cost reimbursement from the southerly abutting Phase II to The Wren, after Phase II (Rosemount Storage)’s entitlement and prior to the issuance of Phase II (Rosemount Storage)’s first permit, respectively.
2. If The Wren required Rosemount Road frontage improvements are completed after the southerly abutting Phase II (Rosemount Storage) improvements have been fully constructed, all work south of the centerline of improvements along the Wren’s frontage west to east will be subject to 50% fair share cost reimbursement to the southerly abutting Phase II prior to The Wren’s first Permit.
3. If the Applicant constructs the 13-foot-wide and 275-foot-long (including the bay taper and storage) Rosemount Road approach deceleration lane completed with curb and gutter prior to the southerly abutting Phase II (Rosemount Storage) construction of the same, the southerly abutting Phase II (Rosemount Storage) will reimburse The Wren its 50% fair share cost reimbursement prior to the issuance of Phase II’s first Permit.
4. If the southerly abutting Phase II (Rosemount Storage) constructs the 13-foot-wide and 275-foot-long (including the bay taper and storage) Rosemount Road approach deceleration lane completed with curb and gutter prior to The Wren’s construction of the same, The Wren will reimburse Phase II its 50% fair share cost reimbursement prior to the issuance of The Wren’s first Permit. v. A speed hump of size and width in accordance with city requirements will be constructed across Rosemount Road at Phase II (Rosemount Storage) Design Review DR 23-002, GPA 23-001, CZ 23-001 – The Wren Final Conditions of Approval for City Council
January 8, 2025
Project’s northeastern boundary entering the adjacent residential neighborhood, complete with solar flashing warning signs, fixed signs and legends.
TRAFFIC SIGNALS
4.38 The Applicant shall complete and/or participate in the following traffic signal installation project to conform to the requirements of “The Wren Transportation Analysis” prepared by Integrated Engineering Group, July 2024 and/or requirements The Wren.
i. A full four-way traffic signalized intersection and all related appurtenances at the intersection of Rosemount Road and Date Palm Drive (“The Intersection”) will be required when the first entitled applicant of either Phase II (Rosemount Storage), The Wren or APN 678-160-022 (grocery shopping center) initiates development construction within each respective entitled project. The first entitled applicant will be required, and not limited to:
ii. Design and construct a four-way traffic signal intersection at the intersection of Date Palm Drive and Rosemount Road to provide full left and right turn vehicle movements for north, south, east and west bound vehicle movements constructed to city standards along Date Palm Drive complete with, and not limited to:
1. Traffic signal poles, signal heads, cabinets, city standardized traffic signal operating equipment within the cabinet, traffic safety lights, street name signs, preemption equipment, video and radar detection equipment, pedestrian heads and call buttons.
2. Curb, gutter, spandrels, intersection paving, ADA compliant corner ramps, crosswalks, signage, pedestrian heads and call buttons at all four (4) corners.
3. Full raised median modifications to provide for 12 to 13 feet wide vehicle left turn pockets for vehicles moving north to west and for vehicles moving south to east with bay taper and storage lengths to be determined by each entitled applicant’s city approved traffic study. Median improvements include, and are not limited to, landscaping, lighting and irrigation.
4. N/A.
5. Intersection preparation, backfill compaction, 150-foot concrete intersection approaches, nuisance and stormwater spandrels, cross gutters, and conduits (for both current and future use) for signal and fiber conductors.
6. Coordinate all traffic signal engineering, signal retiming and synchronization coordination modifications in conjunction with the Coachella Valley Association of Government’s (CVAG) CV Sync program.
7. Note:
Design Review DR 23-002, GPA 23-001, CZ 23-001 – The Wren Final Conditions of Approval for City Council
January 8, 2025
a. The 13-foot-wide deceleration lanes to provide for vehicles moving north to east will be constructed by the Phase II and The Wren and are not subject to “The Intersection”
improvements. The 13-foot-wide deceleration lanes to
provide for vehicles moving north to east is cited in the “Rosemount Storage-Wren Cooperation” as cited in
Conditions of Approval paragraph 4.38.iv 3 and 4.
b. The 13-foot-wide deceleration lanes to provide for vehicles moving south to west will be constructed by APN 678-160- 022 (grocery shopping center) and not subject to “The
Intersection” improvements.
iii. Per the Wren’s Traffic Study, page ii, under Recommended Improvements, a fair share cost participation analysis was determined for all three applicants that abut “The Intersection.” The participation percentages for payment of all cost related to the design and construction of “The Intersection” are as follows:
a. Phase II (Rosemount Storage) = 16.29%
b. The Wren = 13.43%
c. APN 678-160-022 (grocery shopping center) = 70.29%
iv. The first entitled applicant initiating design and construction of “The Intersection”, will be required to provide:
1. The city with the estimated cost of the design of “The Intersection” prior to final “The Intersection” plans approval for bond amount verification.
2. Upon completion of the design of “The Intersection” the Applicant will provide the city with proof of expenditures or applicable reimbursement agreement for bond amount verification.
3. The city with the estimated cost of construction of “The Intersection” prior to city approved final “The Intersection” plans approval for bond amount verification.
4. The city the cost proposal of the actual contractor constructing “The Intersection” for bond amount verification.
5. Upon completion of the construction of “The Intersection” the Applicant will provide the city with proof of expenditures or applicable reimbursement agreement in order that the city can provide the required fair share participation amount to the other aforementioned applicants.
6. The fair share cost reimbursements for the design and construction of “The Intersection” will be paid by the subsequent applicants prior to the issuance of each respective Applicant’s first Permit. v. Note: The city is not obligated, nor required, to pay for the fair share cost reimbursable improvements. The city will only provide assistance for Design Review DR 23-002, GPA 23-001, CZ 23-001 – The Wren Final Conditions of Approval for City Council
January 8, 2025
each entitled applicant to provide the fair share payment amount and confirmation of reimbursement, as applicable, from the other applicants. vi. If the afore cited proposed developments do not move forward, the entitlement participation obligations outlined herein will be passed on to the next applicant of the respective property.
vii. Note: Phase I is not required to initiate the construction of or contribute toward the fair share of “The Intersection” or “Rosemount Storage-Wren Cooperation”.
viii. Prior to commencement of any planning for any improvements subject to fair share cost reimbursement (“The Intersection” or “Rosemount Storage-Wren Cooperation”), the Applicant shall either:
1. If not already submitted or initiated by Phase II (Rosemount Storage) or APN 678-160-022 (grocery shopping center), submit a cooperative agreement subject to fair share cost reimbursement, as approved by the Director of Public Works and City Attorney, which shall specify that the city shall not have responsibility for any costs associated with the improvements plans or improvements, including the waiving of any developers impact fees for the respective improvements; or,
2. If already initiated by Phase II (Rosemount Storage) or APN 678- 160-022 (grocery shopping center), enter into the cooperative agreement subject to fair share cost reimbursement, as previously approved by the Director of Public Works and City Attorney, which shall specify that the city shall not have responsibility for any costs associated with the improvements plans or improvements, including the waiving of any developers impact fees for the respective improvements.
ONSITE PRIVATE ROADWAYS
4.39 The Applicant will design and construct the following private street improvements within The Wren to be retained for private use:
i. Private entry/exit driveway off the north side of Rosemount Road, as generally shown on the DR’s Plans, to be constructed as follows:
1. Curb to curb width of approximately 40 feet.
a. A driveway is to be divided into two (2) sides separated by a minimum 5-foot median.
b. The driveway will provide ingress and egress for residents and visitors. The gate system related to vehicle and
pedestrian entry, exits and refusals, will require approval of the city.
Design Review DR 23-002, GPA 23-001, CZ 23-001 – The Wren Final Conditions of Approval for City Council
January 8, 2025
c. The gated entry/exit shall provide for vehicle stacking capacity for inbound traffic to be a minimum length to
accommodate three (3) vehicles from the call box to the street; and shall provide for a full turn around outlet (egress) for non-accepted vehicles.
i. For the proposed gated entry, the Applicant shall
submit a detailed (including lighting) exhibit at a scale of 1” = 10’, demonstrating that those passenger
vehicles that do not gain entry into the DR can safely
make a full turn-around (minimum radius of 24 feet)
out onto Rosemount Road from the gated entry. The
turn-around clear opening shall be a minimum of
twenty-four (24) feet wide.
ii. Two (2) lanes of traffic shall be provided on the
ingress side of the gated entry, one (1) lane shall be
dedicated for residents and one (1) lane for visitors.
The two travel lanes shall be a minimum of twentyfour (24) feet wide. iii. One (1) lane of traffic shall be provided on the egress side of the gated exit. The one (1) travel lane shall be a minimum of twenty (20) feet wide.
iv. There will be no parking designated on either side of the entry/exit with the curbing to be painted red with
white stenciling of “NO PARKING FIRE LANE.”
v. Driveway entrance radii and drainage design will be
approved by the city and constructed to the same.
ii. Private entry/exit driveway on the north property line of the DR abutting APN 670-110-042 and providing access through APN 670-110-042 to Date Palm Drive and 30th Avenue - as generally shown on the DR’s plans, to be constructed as follows:
1. Curb to Curb width of approximately twenty-eight (28) feet. a. The driveway is to be divided into two (2) sides separated by a decorative or striped lane line.
b. The driveway will provide ingress and egress for residents with electronic gate opening devices. The gate system
related to vehicle entry and exits will require the approval of the city.
c. The gated entry/exit shall provide for vehicle stacking capacity for inbound traffic to be a minimum length to
accommodate one (1) to two (2) vehicles from the gate to the northern property line of the DR.
i. For the proposed gated entry, the Applicant shall
submit a detailed (including lighting) exhibit at a scale of 1” = 10’.
Design Review DR 23-002, GPA 23-001, CZ 23-001 – The Wren Final Conditions of Approval for City Council
January 8, 2025
ii. One (1) lane of traffic shall be provided on the ingress side of the gated entry. The travel lane shall be a
minimum of fourteen (14) feet wide.
iii. One (1) lane of traffic shall be provided on the egress side of the gated exit. The one (1) travel lane shall be a minimum of fourteen (14) feet wide.
iv. There will be no parking designated on either side of the entry/exit with the curbing to be painted red with
white stenciling of “NO PARKING FIRE LANE.”
d. The private entry/exit driveway on the north property line shall connect to APN 670-110-042’s existing parking lot drive aisles for access to the west (connection to Date Palm Drive) and the north (connection to 30th Avenue).
i. The Applicant will construct a full twenty-six (26) foot wide and approximately 260-foot-long drive aisle,
complete with curb and gutter and lighting, connecting
the north property line driveway to the existing APN
670-110-042 drive aisle to the west providing full
access to Date Palm Drive.
ii. The Applicant will construct a full twenty-six (26) foot wide and approximately 200-foot-long drive aisle,
complete with curb and gutter and lighting, connecting
the north property line driveway to the existing APN
670-110-042 drive aisle to the northeast providing full access to 30th Avenue.
iii. The Applicant will construct a six (6) foot wide and approximately 25 feet long sidewalk extension along
the DR’s northern property line, including lighting,
connecting to the east side Date Palm Drive
sidewalks and the DR’s westernmost internal walking
path with a private entry pedestrian path, to provide
full pedestrian access into the DR.
1. The private pedestrian gate will provide ingress
and egress for residents. The gate system
related to pedestrian entry and exits will require
the approval of the city.
e. Installation of a.c. and/or decorative pavement, curb, gutter, striping and signage, storm drain inlets and piping, lighting, and other necessary appurtenances are required to make
the vehicle driveway and pedestrian access complete.
iii. Interior drive aisles and parking lots as generally shown on the DR’s Plans, are to be constructed as follows:
1. The Applicant will construct full width onsite private drive aisles and parking lots within the DR, as generally shown on the DR’s Plans, and subject to approval by the city.
Design Review DR 23-002, GPA 23-001, CZ 23-001 – The Wren Final Conditions of Approval for City Council
January 8, 2025
a. Full onsite private drive aisles and parking lots
improvements include, and not limited to:
i. Installation of a.c. pavement, curb, gutter, striping and signage, storm drain inlets and piping, lighting,
surface stormwater storage systems, and other
necessary appurtenances to make the drive aisles
complete.
iv. The private access driveways, collecting drive aisles and parking spaces will provide ingress, egress and parking for residents, employees, visitors and service vehicles.
v. Stormwater collection on the DR’s drive aisles and parking lots will be via surface sheet flow to ribbon gutters and/or A-6 gutter pan areas and inlet drains constructed to transport water to the DR’s surface retention/infiltration storage basins as generally shown on the DR’s Plans.
SPECIFIC DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION
4.40 The Applicant will design and construct the DR’s public or private roadways corresponding to the following standards:
i. Pavement:
1. The Applicant will design public or private street pavement sections using Caltrans’s design procedure for 20-year life pavement, and the site-specific data for soil strength and anticipated traffic loading (including construction traffic). Minimum structural sections, with asphalt placed in two lifts will be:
a. Date Palm Drive:
i. 5.5” a.c. over 6.5” class II base with 12” at 95%
compaction; or,
ii. 1” over existing, whichever is greater.
iii. Grind and overlay existing Date Palm Drive a.c. a
minimum of 1½ - inch as needed to create a 2%
crossfall to meet new a.c. placed adjacent the new
curb and gutter cited in the Condition above to be
shown on the engineering Plans and approved by the
city.
b. Rosemount Drive:
i. 4.0” a.c. over 5.0” class II base with 12” at 95%
compaction
c. Onsite (including on APN 670-110-042) driveways, drive aisles and parking lots will be as follows:
i. 3.0” a.c. over 4.5” class II base with 12” at 95%
compaction; or,
Design Review DR 23-002, GPA 23-001, CZ 23-001 – The Wren Final Conditions of Approval for City Council
January 8, 2025
ii. 6.0” Portland Cement Concrete (PCC) with steel
mesh over 4.5” class II base with 12” at 95%
compaction.
ii. Sidewalks:
1. The Applicant will construct curb adjacent concrete sidewalks or non-curb adjacent concrete sidewalks as generally shown on the DR’s Plans in conformance with ADA requirements using RC Std. 401 sidewalk width shall be as follows:
a. Date Palm Drive: 8-feet-wide.
b. Rosemount Drive: 5 feet wide.
c. Northern property line: 6-feet-wide.
iii. Curbs and Gutters:
1. The Applicant will construct curbs and related appurtenances in accordance with (as applicable):
a. RC Std. 200 Type A-6 Curb and Gutter (6” curb face); or, b. RC Std. 200 Type A-8 Curb and Gutter (8” curb face); or, c. RC Std. 204 Type “D” Curb (6” curb face).
d. On public streets where no parking is allowed the street will be posted with “NO PARKING” signs at locations approved by the city.
e. On private streets and/or drive aisles where no parking is allowed, the street curbing and/or pavement will be painted red with white stenciling of “NO PARKING FIRE LANE.”
f. Curbs will be constructed to convey water without ponding and provide lateral containment of dust and residue during street sweeping operations.
iv. Cross Gutters and Spandrels:
1. RC Std. 209 Cross Gutter and Spandrel.
2. RC Std. 210 Cross Gutter and Spandrel with Splash Area. v. Dead Ends:
1. Whether interim of permanent, the “Dead End” on private drive aisles will incorporate signing, striping and/or improvements to minimize turning conflicts to be approved by the city.
vi. Corner Curve Radii:
1. The Applicant will construct corners with the following curve radii criteria:
a. Onsite driveways within the DR: 25-foot to 35-foot, and/or radii as generally shown on the DR’s Plans.
b. Entryway streets from public streets connecting the DR:
i. Minimum 25 to 35-foot radii to be shown on the DR’s
Plans to be approved by the city.
Design Review DR 23-002, GPA 23-001, CZ 23-001 – The Wren Final Conditions of Approval for City Council
January 8, 2025
vii. ADA Ramps:
1. The Applicant will construct ADA ramps in conformance with Caltrans A88A Standards using the appropriate Case or Detail on and offsite of the DR.
viii. Connectivity:
1. The Applicant will ensure that the DR infrastructure is built with connectivity to the north, south, west, or east with roadways, drainage facilities, sidewalks, ADA paths of travel, utilities and all other infrastructure necessary for completing the DR.
ix. Line of Sights:
1. The Applicant will remove/relocate and/or reconstruct all existing landscaping, monuments and/or structures that the city determines to impair vehicle, bicycle and/or pedestrian line-of-sights along all the frontages associated with the DR.
GENERAL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION
4.41 The Applicant will construct all streets, parking areas, drive aisles, curbs and gutters, sidewalks, and driveways to uniformly connect to existing adjacent public and/or private improvements within and adjacent the DR.
4.42 The Applicant will construct all appurtenant roadway components such as, but not limited to, curb, gutter, sidewalk, ADA ramps, traffic control striping, legends, traffic control signs and street name signs in accordance with city and MUTCD standards.
4.43 The Applicant will construct and dedicate streets and related street improvements to conform to the General Plan and/or requirements of the DR’s Traffic Study.
4.44 The Applicant will construct full crowned street improvements and coordinate all public and private roadway improvements, driveway transitions, relocation of fire hydrants, water meters, storm drains, and all other appurtenances as required.
4.45 Right-of-Way geometry for property line corner cutbacks at curb returns will conform to RC Std. 805.
4.46 Improvements will be designed and constructed in accordance with city adopted standards, supplemental drawings, and specifications.
4.47 All public and private improvements will be subject to city requirements and inspection during construction.
4.48 The city will conduct final inspections of building structures when the building structures have improved street and sidewalk access to publicly maintained Design Review DR 23-002, GPA 23-001, CZ 23-001 – The Wren Final Conditions of Approval for City Council
January 8, 2025
streets. The improvements will include the required traffic control devices, pavement markings, ADA improvements and street name signs.
4.49 The Applicant will complete the final onsite pavement lifts prior to the first COO of the DR.
STREET LIGHTS
4.50 The Applicant shall coordinate and pay all costs necessary for the installation of the below detailed City and Southern California Edison (SCE) approved LED street light with SCE and to take over all related expenses, including the monthly electrical expense for the street lights installed prior to the issuance of the first COO of the DR. The Applicant shall execute a Street Light Covenant and be reviewed and approved by the Director of Public Works prior to recordation. i. Install four (4) 76 equivalent LED wattage LED street lights per city, Riverside County and SCE standards along the DR’s Date Palm Drive frontage approximately 200 feet apart starting north of Rosemount Road at the southwest corner of the DR, as generally shown on the DR’s Plans with the final locations to be approved by the city prior to the issuance of the first COO of the DR.
ii. Install two (2) 29 equivalent LED wattage LED street lights per city, Riverside County and SCE standards along the DR’s south Rosemount Road frontage approximately 200 feet apart starting from Date Palm Drive at the southwest corner of the DR, as generally shown on the DR’s Plans, with the final locations to be approved by the city prior to the issuance of the first COO of the DR.
OVERHEAD AND OTHER UTILITIES
4.51 Where applicable, the Applicant will coordinate and pay all cost necessary for the undergrounding and removal of all, and not limited to, aerial wires, power lines, telephone wires, cable lines, communication equipment, pole under burden and respective poles that are within the DR prior to the issuance of the first COO of the DR.
i. Where existing overhead utilities exist, the Applicant will seek a concurrence from the city on which lines are and/or are not subject to undergrounding per Cathedral City Municipal Code §8.30.050, after which, the Applicant will coordinate all undergrounding of existing facilities with each respective utility, service provider and adjacent properties owners to ensure that all aerial lines are
removed/undergrounded from the DR property.
ii. If applicable, the Applicant will coordinate and pay all cost necessary for the undergrounding and removal of all, and not limited to, aerial wires, Design Review DR 23-002, GPA 23-001, CZ 23-001 – The Wren Final Conditions of Approval for City Council
January 8, 2025
power lines, telephone wires, cable lines, communication equipment, pole under burden and respective poles that are within the DR prior to the issuance of the first COO of the DR.
iii. If applicable, the Applicant will coordinate all undergrounding of existing facilities with each respective utility, service provider and adjacent properties owners to ensure that all aerial lines are removed from the DR site.
4.52 The Applicant will obtain approval from the city for the location of all utility lines within any right-of-way, and all above-ground utility structures including, but not limited to, traffic signal cabinets, electrical vaults, water valves, and telephone stands, to ensure optimum placement for practical and aesthetic purposes.
4.53 All service runs and new utilities will be installed underground, per the utility purveyor standards.
4.54 Underground utilities will be installed prior to overlaying hardscape. For installation of utilities in existing improved streets, the Applicant will comply with trench restoration requirements required by the city.
4.55 The Applicant will provide certified reports of all utility trench compaction for city approval.
4.56 The DR will be served with a gravity sanitary sewer system, a domestic water system and a fire protection system in accordance with CVWD and Cathedral City Fire Department requirements and standards. The Applicant will pay to the city and CVWD all applicable sewer and water service charges, capacity charges and construction reimbursements to ensure all services are complete, in place and operational prior to the first COO being issued for the DR.
4.57 The Applicant will abandon or relocate existing easements over the DR prior to the issuance of the first COO of the DR, as required by the agency and/or individual favored and as approved by the city. Additionally, the Applicant will relocate existing utility facilities that are required by all utility purveyors prior to issuance of the first building permit.
IMPROVEMENT PLANS
As used throughout these Conditions of Approval, professional titles such as “engineer,”’ “surveyor,” and “architect,” refer to persons currently certified or licensed to practice their respective professions in the State of California.
4.58 Improvement plans will be prepared, for each phase, by or under the direct supervision of qualified engineers and/or architects, as appropriate, and will comply with all the requirements of the city.
Design Review DR 23-002, GPA 23-001, CZ 23-001 – The Wren Final Conditions of Approval for City Council
January 8, 2025
4.59 The following improvement plans will be prepared and submitted for review to the city. A separate set of plans for each line-item specified below will be prepared.
The plans will utilize the minimum scale specified, unless authorized by the city.
Plans may be prepared at a larger scale if additional detail or plan clarity is desired.
NOTE: Engineering Site Plans will be prepared by a Civil Engineer licensed to practice their profession in the State of California.
NOTE: The Applicant may be required to prepare other improvement plans not listed here pursuant to improvements required by other agencies and utility purveyors.
A. On-Site Rough Grading Plan 1” = 10’ Horizontal
B. PM 10 Plan and Packet 1” = 20’ Horizontal (Plan)
C. Erosion Control Plan 1” = 20’ Horizontal
D. WQMP Plan (Plan submitted in report form)
NOTE: A through D to be submitted concurrently.
NOTE: Rough Grading Plan will normally include perimeter wall with Top of Wall and Top of Footing elevations shown. All footings will have a minimum of 1-foot of cover, or sufficient cover to clear any adjacent obstructions.
E. Precise Grading Plan 1” = 10’ Horizontal
F. On Site Storm Drain Plan 1” = 10’ Horizontal
G. Street Improvements Plan 1” = 10’ Horizontal, 1’ = 2’ Vertical H. Street Signing/Striping Plan 1” = 10’ Horizontal
I. Signal Plan (if applicable) 1” = 10’ Horizontal
J. Monumentation Plan 1” = 10’ Horizontal
NOTE: E through J to be submitted concurrently.
NOTE: Precise Grading Plan will normally include perimeter wall with Top of Wall and Top of Footing elevations shown. All footings will have a minimum of 1-foot of cover, or sufficient cover to clear any adjacent obstructions.
NOTE: The Precise Grading Plan will show the sidewalk in the combined parkway and landscape setback area.
NOTE: The street improvement plans will also show the sidewalk in the combined parkway and landscape setback area.
NOTE: A separate On-Site Storm Drain Plan is required by the city.
Design Review DR 23-002, GPA 23-001, CZ 23-001 – The Wren Final Conditions of Approval for City Council
January 8, 2025
Other engineered improvement plans prepared for city approval that are not listed above will be prepared in formats approved by the city prior to commencing plan preparation.
All plans will show all existing improvements for a distance of at least 200 feet beyond the DR limits, or a distance sufficient to show any required design transitions.
All Signing and Striping Plans will show, at a minimum; Stop Signs, Limit Lines and Legends, No Parking Signs, Raised Pavement Markers (RPMs) (including Blue RPMs at fire hydrants) and Street Name Signs per Cathedral City Standard Plans and/or as approved by the city.
4.60 The Applicant will furnish accurate mylars of all improvement plans, to the city for approval. The improvement plans will be of a scale approved by the city.
4.61 The Applicant will furnish a PDF copy of all approved improvement plans acceptable to the city.
4.62 Upon completion of construction, and prior to final acceptance of the improvements by the city, the Applicant will furnish the city with reproducible record drawings, of all improvement plans which were approved by the city.
Each sheet will be clearly marked “As Built” and will be stamped and signed by the engineer or surveyor certifying the accuracy and completeness of the drawings. The applicant will have all approved Mylars previously submitted to the city, revised to reflect the as-built conditions. The Applicant will employ or retain the Engineer of Record (EOR) during the construction phase of the project so that the EOR can make site visits in support of preparing “As Built”. However, if subsequent approved revisions have been approved by the city and reflect said “As Built” conditions, the EOR may submit a letter attesting to said fact to the city in lieu of Mylar submittal.
IMPROVEMENT SECURITY AGREEMENTS
4.63 A Public Works Completion Agreement is required prior to issuance of an Encroachment Permit(s) for the DR’s Date Palm Drive improvements, Rosemount Road improvements, “The Intersection” improvements and the “Rosemount Storage-Wren Cooperation” improvements. The Public Works Completion Agreement will be entered into by and between the Applicant and the city, for the purpose of guaranteeing the completion of the public improvements related to the DR and shall comply with all applicable city codes and ordinances.
All required improvement securities shall be in a form and amount as approved by the City Attorney and city. Evidence of liability and worker’s compensation insurance coverage shall be submitted as required by the terms of the Public Works Completion Agreement.
Design Review DR 23-002, GPA 23-001, CZ 23-001 – The Wren Final Conditions of Approval for City Council
January 8, 2025
4.64 A Landscaping Maintenance Agreement is required prior to the issuance of the first COO of the DR and will be released one year after the final COO of the DR is issued. The Landscaping Maintenance Agreement will be entered into by and between the Applicant and the city, for the purpose of guaranteeing the establishment of all offsite and onsite landscaping improvements, including and not limited to, planted trees, bushes, shrubs, etc. installed by the Applicant as required for the DR in compliance will all applicable city codes and ordinances.
All required improvement securities shall be in a form and amount as approved by the City Attorney and city. Evidence of liability and worker’s compensation insurance coverage shall be submitted as required by the terms of the Public Works Completion Agreement.
4.65 Improvements to be made, or agreed to be made, shall include the removal of any existing structures or other obstructions which are not a part of the proposed improvements.
Improvements and obligations required shall be either complete prior to the issuance of the first COO of the DR, or as otherwise approved by the city.
In the event the Applicant fails to construct the improvements for the DR or fails to satisfy its obligations for the DR in a timely manner, the city shall have the right to halt issuance of permits, and/or final inspections, withhold other approvals related to the development of the DR.
4.66 Prior to improvement plans approval, the Applicant will submit applicable fees or deposits for the cost of reviewing the applicable, and not limited to, Public Works Completion Agreement(s), Drainage Covenant, Mutual Drainage Easements, Street Light Covenant, PM-10 Cleanup Mitigation Covenant and/or any other requests or form submittals made by the Applicant related to the DR. Once approved by the city, the Applicant will execute and record such Covenants.
4.67 The Applicant will provide security to guarantee the final monumentation of the DR. All securities for the final survey monumentation will be in the form of 100% cash deposits.
GRADING
4.68 The Applicant will comply with all the provisions of Cathedral City municipal codes and ordinances.
4.69 The Applicant will obtain a Grading Permit approved by the city prior to initiating any construction or on the project site.
4.70 To obtain an approved Grading Permit, the applicant will submit and obtain approval of all of the following:
Design Review DR 23-002, GPA 23-001, CZ 23-001 – The Wren Final Conditions of Approval for City Council
January 8, 2025
i. A Grading Plan prepared by a civil engineer registered in the State of California,
ii. A preliminary geotechnical (“Soils”) Report prepared by a professional registered in the State of California,
iii. A Fugitive Dust Control Packet prepared in accordance with city requirements,
iv. An Erosion Control Plan prepared in accordance with city requirements, v. A Best Management Practices report prepared in accordance with city requirements (NPDES Stormwater Discharge Permit and Storm Management and Discharge Controls),
vi. A WQMP prepared by an authorized professional registered in the State of California, and
vii. Where applicable, a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) issued by FEMA. If the Applicant is not securing a CLOMR the Applicant must verify that the entire Project limits are outside a FEMA designated Flood Hazard Area and/or Area of Flood Hazard Risk as designated by the latest approved FEMA FIRM Map and in accordance with the Cathedral City Municipal Code Chapter 8.24.
4.71 All grading will conform with the recommendations contained in the Preliminary Soils Report and, if applicable, the Phase 1 Environmental Assessment report and will be certified as being adequate by the soils engineer, or engineering geologist registered in the State of California.
4.72 A statement will appear on the DR Grading Plans that a soils report has been prepared in accordance with the California Health and Safety Code §17953 and California Government Code §66490.
4.73 The Applicant will furnish security, in a form acceptable to the city, and in an amount sufficient to guarantee compliance with the approved Fugitive Dust Control Plan provisions as submitted with its application for a grading permit.
Additionally, the Applicant will replenish said security if expended by the city to comply with the Fugitive Dust Control Plan as required by the city.
4.74 The Applicant will maintain all open graded, undeveloped land to prevent wind and/or water erosion of such land. All open graded, undeveloped land will either be planted with interim landscaping, stabilized with other erosion control measures, or maintained as were approved in the Fugitive Dust Control Plan.
4.75 Grading within the parkway areas will conform to city requirements except as otherwise modified by this condition. The maximum slope will not be steeper than 3:1 anywhere in the landscape setback area, except for the back slope (i.e. the slope at the back of the landscaped lot) which will not be steeper than 2:1 if fully planted with ground cover. The steepest slope in the first six (6) feet adjacent to the curb will not exceed 4:1 when the nearest edge of sidewalk is within six feet (6’) of the curb, otherwise the steepest slope within the right of way will not be steeper than 3:1. All unpaved parkway areas adjacent to the curb will Design Review DR 23-002, GPA 23-001, CZ 23-001 – The Wren Final Conditions of Approval for City Council
January 8, 2025
be depressed one and one-half inches (1.5”) in the first eighteen inches (18’) behind the curb.
4.76 Building pad elevations on the Plans submitted for city’s approval shall conform to the pad elevations shown on the engineering grading Plans, unless the pad elevations have other requirements imposed elsewhere in the Conditions of Approval.
4.77 Building pad elevations of perimeter lots will not differ by more than one foot higher from the building pads in adjacent development. The Applicant will minimize the differences in elevation between the adjoining properties and the parcel pads within this development.
4.78 Prior to any site grading or re-grading that will raise or lower any portion of the site by more than plus or minus half of a foot (0.5’) from the elevation shown on the approved DR grading Plans, the Applicant will submit the proposed grading changes to the city for a substantial conformance review.
4.79 Prior to the issuance of a Building Permit for the DR, the Applicant will provide a parcel pad certification stamped and signed by a qualified engineer or surveyor with applicable compaction tests and over excavation documentation. Each pad certification will list the pad elevation as shown on the approved grading plan, the actual pad elevation and the difference between the two, if any. Such pad certification will also list the relative compaction of the pad soil. The data will be organized by lot number and listed cumulatively if submitted at different times.
SECTION 5 FIRE PROTECTION
Unless specifically stated herein, these conditions shall not be construed to permit or allow deviation from any Federal or State laws nor any of the local codes and ordinances adopted by this jurisdiction. Please contact the City of Cathedral City Fire Department for any questions regarding compliance with the applicable codes or following conditions:
Note: All references to the 2022 California Fire Code are shown as CFC, the 2022 California Building Code is shown as CBC and the California Code of Regulations are shown as CCR.
AGENCY APPROVALS
5.1 The Final Conditions of Approval for this project shall be included in any site plan or construction plans submitted for permit issuance. Plans will not be approved without reference to these “conditions”.
5.2 This project is subject to review and approval in accordance with the CCR, Title 19 for Fire and Life Safety. This project is subject to an annual inspection and permit from the Cathedral City Fire Department for this type of occupancy (use).
Design Review DR 23-002, GPA 23-001, CZ 23-001 – The Wren Final Conditions of Approval for City Council
January 8, 2025
FIRE ACCESS
5.3 A fire department access plan shall be submitted to the City of Cathedral City Fire Department for review and approval prior to the issuance of any building permits.
5.4 Fire Lanes parallel to the main building and providing access to the permanent generator and tower shall be a minimum of 20 feet wide, unobstructed.
5.5 “No Parking, Fire Lane” signs shall be posted parking area(s) where the permanent generator is to be installed.
FIRE PROTECTION
5.6 Portable fire extinguishers shall be installed and maintained in accordance with CFC, Section 906 and CCR, Title 19, Chapter 3. The fire extinguisher types, sizes and locations shall be included on architectural plan submittal and approved by the Cathedral City Fire Department prior to installation.
MISCELLANEOUS
5.7 Means of egress shall be in compliance with CFC Chapter 10, to include signs and door locking mechanisms.
5.8 The doors must be operable from the inside of the building for occupant exiting.
Surface latches and security bars are not permitted.
5.9 Where applicable, a National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 704H Diamond shall be installed.
5.10 Hazardous materials use and storage, if applicable, shall comply with the California Fire Code and NFPA Standards.
5.11 Extension cord and flexible cords shall not be used as a substitute for permanent wiring (2022 CFC § 604.5).
5.12 Address numbers shall be placed in a position to be plainly legible from the street or road, shall be a minimum of 12-inch high numbers with a minimum 1½ inch stroke, and be illuminated (back or surface lit).
5.13 Doors into electrical control panel rooms shall be marked with a plainly visible and legible sign made of durable material stating ELECTRICAL ROOM. The signage shall be in white letters on red background.
5.14 Access to the electrical panel shall be maintained with three feet of clearance in front of the panel, and 30 inches of clearance above and to the sides of the panel.
5.15 All equipment, including generator shall be UL compliant.
SECTION 6 BUILDING DEPARTMENT
6.1 Shall comply with the latest adopted edition of the following codes as applicable:
Design Review DR 23-002, GPA 23-001, CZ 23-001 – The Wren Final Conditions of Approval for City Council
January 8, 2025
A. California Building Code
B. California Electrical Code
C. California Mechanical Code
D. California Plumbing Code
E. California Energy Code
F. California Fire Code
G. California Green Building Standards Code
6.2 Refer to Fire Marshal’s comments regarding Fire and Smoke Suppression Systems.
6.3 The requirements of the Air Quality Management District shall be satisfied prior to the issuance of any permit if dusts and/or pollutants will be discharged into the atmosphere.
6.4 Any temporary building, trailer, commercial coach, etc. installed and/or used in connection with a construction project shall comply with City Code.
6.5 All signs shall be Underwriters Laboratories approved, or equal.
6.6 Permits are required prior to the removal and/or demolition of structures.
6.7 All exterior lighting shall be oriented, directed, and/or shielded as much as possible so that direct illumination does not infringe onto adjoining properties.
6.8 If hazardous substances are used and/or stored, a technical opinion and report, identifying and developing methods of protection from the hazards presented by the hazardous materials, may be required. This report shall be prepared by a qualified person, firm, or corporation and submitted to Building & Safety. This report shall also explain the proposed facility’s intended methods of operation and list of all of the proposed materials, their quantities, classifications, and the effects of any chemical (material) inter-mixing in the event of an accident or spill.
6.9 Please be aware a Construction Waste Management Plan (CWMP) will be required at time of plan check submittal.
6.10 Separate permits will be issued for structures that are not a part of the building.
For example, the trash enclosure, the parking lot light standards, etc. Separate permit(s) will also be required for any signage that is and isn’t part of the building.
6.11 Additions to Non-Residential buildings shall comply with CA Energy Code Section 141.0.
6.12 SoCalGas Distribution does have High-Pressure facilities in the area. Please note on case to have Developer contact 811 / USA or through utilizing Dig Alert prior to any excavation / demolition activities so we can Locate & Mark out our facilities.
Design Review DR 23-002, GPA 23-001, CZ 23-001 – The Wren Final Conditions of Approval for City Council
January 8, 2025
6.13 If the Developer needs new gas service, please have them contact our Builder Services group to begin the application process as soon as practicable, at https://www.socalgas.com/for-your-business/builder-services.
6.14 Prior to commencing any street improvements, the applicant shall contact SoCalGas for the gas company to complete leak survey and repair any leaks, if found:
A. For MINOR street improvements (chip seal, slurry seal, grind & overlay): 4 months prior to start of pavement projects;
B. For MAJOR street improvements (projects requiring excavations greater than 9 inches, widening of existing streets, installing new curbs and gutters, bus pads, traffic signals, realignment, grade separation, etc.
And
C. For PIPELINE projects (storm drain, water line, water , sewer, electrical, telecom, fiber, etc.): please provide Southern California Gas (SoCalGas) with your signed designed plans with gas company facilities posted on your design plans, 4-6 months prior to start of construction for possible relocation of SoCalGas medium pressure facilities and 9-12 months for possible relocation of SoCalGas high pressure facilities.
D. Please keep SoCalGas informed of any and all pre-construction meetings, construction schedules, etc. so that their work can be scheduled accordingly.
E. Potholing may be required to determine if a conflict exists between the proposed development and SoCalGas facilities. If for any reason there are SoCalGas facilities in conflict, and a request to relocate is needed, it is important to send the request in writing; please include all the required information below:
i. A signed “Notice to Owner” request on official letterhead from the City, County, or company;
ii. Name, title, and project number;
iii. Address, location, start date, parameters, and scope of entire job project,
iv. Copy of Thomas Guide Page and/or Google Map screenshot highlighting Project area.
6.15 Requestor Company’s contact name, title phone number, email, and other pertinent information
SECTION 7 AIRPORT LAND USE COMPATABILITY
7.1 The applicant shall comply with ALUC conditions of approval as stated in their September 12, 2024 approval letter:
Design Review DR 23-002, GPA 23-001, CZ 23-001 – The Wren Final Conditions of Approval for City Council
January 8, 2025
e. Any outdoor lighting installed shall be hooded or shielded to prevent either the spillage of lumens or reflection into the sky. Outdoor lighting shall be downward facing.
f. The following uses are prohibited:
(a) Any use which would direct a steady light or flashing light of red, white, green, or amber colors associated with airport operations toward an aircraft engaged in an initial straight climb following takeoff or toward an aircraft engaged in a straight final approach toward a landing at an airport, other than an FAA-approved navigational signal light or visual approach slope indicator.
(b) Any use which would cause sunlight to be reflected towards an aircraft engaged in an initial straight climb following takeoff or towards an aircraft engaged in a straight final approach towards a landing at an airport.
(c) Any use which would generate smoke or water vapor or which would attract large concentrations of birds, or which may otherwise affect safe air navigation within the area. (Such uses include landscaping utilizing water features, aquaculture, outdoor production of cereal grains, sunflower, and row crops, composting operations, wastewater management facilities, artificial marshes, trash transfer stations that are open on one or more sides, recycling centers containing putrescible wastes, construction and demolition debris facilities, fly ash disposal, and incinerators.)
(d) Any use which would generate electrical interference that may be detrimental to the operation of aircraft and/or aircraft instrumentation. (e)Any use which results in a hazard to flight, including physical (e.g., tall objects), visual, and electronic forms of interference with the safety of aircraft operations
c. The attached “Notice of Airport in Vicinity” shall be provided to all prospective purchasers and occupants of the property.
d. Any proposed stormwater basins or facilities shall be designed and maintained to provide for a maximum 48-hour detention period following the design storm, and remain totally dry between rainfalls. Vegetation in and around the basins that would provide food or cover for birds would be incompatible with airport operations and shall not be utilized in project landscaping. Trees shall be spaced so as to prevent large expanses of contiguous canopy, when mature. Landscaping in and around the basin(s) shall not include trees or shrubs that produce seeds, fruits, or berries.
Landscaping in the stormwater basin, if not rip-rap, should be in accordance with the guidance provided in ALUC “LANDSCAPING NEAR AIRPORTS” brochure, and the “AIRPORTS, WILDLIFE AND STORMWATER
MANAGEMENT” brochure available at RCALUC.ORG which list acceptable Design Review DR 23-002, GPA 23-001, CZ 23-001 – The Wren Final Conditions of Approval for City Council
January 8, 2025
plants from Riverside County Landscaping Guide or other alternative landscaping as may be recommended by a qualified wildlife hazard biologist.
A notice sign, in a form similar to that attached hereto, shall be permanently affixed to the stormwater basin with the following language: “There is an airport nearby. This stormwater basin is designed to hold stormwater for only 48 hours and not attract birds. Proper maintenance is necessary to avoid bird strikes”. The sign will also include the name, telephone number or other contact information of the person or entity responsible to monitor the stormwater basin.
Approved for Planning Entitlements by the Cathedral City Planning Commission on November 20, 2024.
Inclusive of pages 1-36
Attest: Applicant:
___________________________ _________________________
Cynthia Schultz Stefan Vogel, Owner
Associate Planner S2 Builders, Inc.
Design Review DR 23-002, GPA 23-001, CZ 23-001 – The Wren Final Conditions of Approval for City Council
January 8, 2025
The red line indicates where the proposed sidewalk is being replaced with a resident gate for improved access, safety, and convenience for residents (blue line). Enhanced landscaping will be placed along the northern boundary where the sidewalk was proposed.
3. / A-16
197'-7"
46'-0" 25'-6" 13'-6" 13'-6" 13'-6" 13'-6" 25'-6" 46'-0"
PATIO PATIO
PATIO PATIO PATIO PATIO
UNIT B2 UNIT B7 UNIT B7 UNIT B2 PATIO PATIO
RESIDENT PARKING
M. BATH
W.I.C.
UP
ELEC. ELEC.
STOR.
STOR.
STOR.
STOR.
STAIR TO UPPER
FLOOR UNITS LOW
VOLTAGE
WATER
SERVICE
UNIT B5 UNIT A1 UNIT A1 UNIT B5
STOR. STOR.
DIRECT ACCESS
GARAGE FOR
UNIT B1
DIRECT ACCESS
GARAGE FOR
UNIT B2
DIRECT ACCESS
GARAGE FOR
UNIT B4
DIRECT ACCESS
GARAGE FOR
UNIT B5
DIRECT ACCESS
GARAGE FOR
UNIT B5
DIRECT ACCESS
GARAGE FOR
UNIT B4
DIRECT ACCESS
GARAGE FOR
UNIT B2
DIRECT ACCESS
GARAGE FOR
UNIT B1
PATIO PATIO PATIO PATIO
PATIO PATIO
22'-6" 5'-0" 21'-6" 81'-10" 21'-6" 5'-0" 22'-6"
1. / A-15
0' 8' 16' 32'
SCALE 1
8" = 1'-0"(ON 24 x 36 SHEET)
HUMPHREYS & PARTNERS ARCHITECTS, L.P.
5339 Alpha Rd., Suite 300, Dallas, TX 75240 | 972.701.9636 | www.humphreys.com 36101 BOB HOPE DRIVE, SUITE E5, RANCHO MIRAGE, CA 92270
17'-11"
4. / A-23
T.O. PLATE
T.O. PLATE
T.O. PLATE
HEADER
4'-9"
2. / A-23
17'-11"
HEADER
2. / A-23
19'-3"
GAR.DOOR
HEADER
2. / A-23
HUMPHREYS & PARTNERS ARCHITECTS, L.P.
5339 Alpha Rd., Suite 300, Dallas, TX 75240 | 972.701.9636 | www.humphreys.com 36101 BOB HOPE DRIVE, SUITE E5, RANCHO MIRAGE, CA 92270
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.1
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.1
0.1 0.1
0.1 0.1
0.1 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.1 0.1
0.2 0.2
0.2 0.1
0.1 0.1
0.1 0.1
0.1 0.1
0.1 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.1
0.1 0.1
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.1
0.1 0.1
0.1 0.1
0.1 0.2
0.5 0.6
0.4 0.2
0.2 0.2
0.2 0.2
0.2 0.1
0.1 0.1
0.1 0.1
0.1 0.1
0.1 0.1
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.1 0.1
0.2 0.2
0.3 0.4
0.6 0.8
1.2 1.6
1.1 0.9
0.9 0.8
0.5 0.3
0.3 0.6
0.6 0.3
0.1 0.3
1.0 0.9
0.4 0.6
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.1
0.1 0.2
0.0 0.0
0.1 0.1
0.2 0.3
0.4 0.5
0.9 1.6
2.9 3.5
2.7 2.3
3.3 3.7
1.7 0.6
1.2 3.0
3.6 1.4
0.5 1.7
4.1 4.6
2.5 3.1
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.1 0.2
0.9 1.9
0.2 0.1
0.1 0.2
0.3 0.4
0.5 0.6
1.0 1.5
2.3 2.8
2.6 3.8
5.5 6.7
4.5 1.5
2.7 4.5
6.1 4.0
1.3 2.8
5.0 5.8
5.1 3.7
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.1 0.7
3.8 4.1
0.7 0.2
0.1 0.2
0.3 0.4
0.6 0.8
1.8 2.0
1.5 1.6
2.0 4.5
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.2 1.3
5.3 6.3
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.1 0.6
3.0 2.9
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.1 0.2
0.8 1.5
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.1 0.2
1.0 2.1
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.1 0.6
3.7 4.2
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.2 1.2
5.2 6.4
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.1 0.6
2.9 3.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.1 0.2
0.9 1.6
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.2
0.8 3.5
3.3 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.1
0.2 1.2
1.9 0.1
0.1 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.1 0.1
0.2 0.7
1.7 0.2
0.2 0.1
0.0 0.0
0.1 0.1
0.5 3.3
4.1 0.3
0.3 0.3
0.3 0.1
0.1 0.2
1.2 5.3
6.6 0.4
0.5 0.6
0.6 0.6
0.5 0.4
0.8 3.4
5.1 4.9
6.7 3.1
1.6 1.0
3.7 5.7
4.5 3.1
1.4 0.9
1.3 1.9
1.7 1.6
1.6 1.9
1.5 1.0
0.6 0.9
0.4 0.2
0.2 0.1
0.1 0.1
0.2 0.4
0.5 0.6
0.9 1.1
0.9 1.0
0.9 1.5
2.7 3.8
5.4 3.1
0.9 0.5
2.6 5.1
4.1 1.9
0.6 0.5
0.5 0.5
0.6 0.7
0.6 0.5
0.5 0.6
1.8 4.0
0.3 0.4
0.6 0.9
1.5 1.8
1.7 1.3
1.0 1.1
1.1 1.6
0.9 0.4
0.3 0.6
0.2 0.3
0.5 1.1
2.1 3.5
3.2 1.9
1.1 1.2
1.2 1.1
0.7 0.4
0.3 0.5
0.1 0.1
0.3 0.5
1.2 2.3
2.6 1.9
1.4 2.0
3.0 4.1
2.0 0.6
0.5 1.9
4.2 3.3
1.0 0.4
0.4 0.4
0.4 0.5
0.6 0.5
0.4 0.4
0.6 1.6
3.3 0.0
0.0 0.1
0.2 0.5
0.9 0.8
1.2 3.2
6.1 0.0
0.0 0.1
0.1 0.3
0.4 0.4
1.2 5.2
6.5 0.0
0.0 0.1
0.1 0.1
0.2 0.2
1.1 4.0
4.8 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.1 0.1
0.1 0.1
0.3 1.7
2.6 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.1
0.1 0.1
0.2 0.5
1.3 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.1 0.1
0.3 2.1
3.8 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.1 0.2
1.0 4.7
5.7 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.1 0.1
1.0 3.9
4.7 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.1 0.1
0.3 1.7
2.6 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.1 0.1
0.3 0.9
1.4 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.1 0.2
1.0 3.9
2.2 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.1 0.3
2.3 6.2
3.8 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.1 0.3
1.6 4.1
2.5 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.1 0.2
0.9 3.6
3.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.1 0.3
1.6 5.0
3.1 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.1 0.3
2.2 5.8
4.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.1 0.2
0.9 3.1
1.6 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.1 0.1
0.3 0.9
1.2 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.1
0.3 1.7
3.1 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.1
0.9 4.3
5.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.2
1.2 4.6
5.5 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.1
0.4 2.3
2.8 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.1
0.2 0.6
1.3 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.1
0.3 1.6
3.3 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.1
0.8 4.2
5.3 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.1
1.1 4.5
6.2 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.1
0.4 2.1
4.1 4.9
6.7 3.6
1.5 0.9
4.1 6.3
4.2 2.5
0.8 0.6
0.6 0.7
0.9 1.4
2.1 2.2
1.7 1.2
1.2 1.8
3.1 3.2
2.2 2.4
3.2 2.7
2.1 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.1
0.1 0.4
1.2 1.9
3.2 1.8
0.5 0.3
1.3 3.1
2.3 0.9
0.4 0.4
0.4 0.6
1.0 1.9
3.3 3.7
2.4 1.5
1.1 1.8
5.1 5.3
2.3 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.1 0.1
0.2 0.3
0.5 0.3
0.1 0.1
0.2 0.5
0.5 0.3
0.2 0.3
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.1
0.1 0.1
0.1 0.1
0.1 0.1
0.1 0.1
0.1 0.2
0.2 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.1 0.1
0.1 0.1
0.0 0.0
0.1 0.2
0.3 0.3
0.2 0.2
0.3 0.5
1.0 1.1
0.9 0.9
1.1 1.0
0.9 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.1 0.1
0.1 0.1
0.1 0.1
0.2 0.2
0.3 0.4
0.4 0.4
0.4 0.4
0.4 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.1 0.1
0.1 0.1
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
SHARED ACCESS ROAD 0.0
0.0 0.1
0.1 0.5
2.2 1.8
0.0 0.0
0.1 0.3
1.8 4.8
2.3 0.0
0.0 0.1
0.4 2.5
5.9 3.3
0.0 0.0
0.1 0.3
1.2 3.7
1.9 0.0
0.0 0.1
0.2 1.2
4.6 2.7
0.0 0.0
0.1 0.4
2.4 6.3
3.6 0.0
0.0 0.1
0.3 1.7
4.0 2.3
0.0 0.0
0.1 0.2
0.6 1.9
1.4 0.0
0.0 0.1
0.1 0.2
0.9 1.6
0.0 0.0
0.1 0.1
0.6 3.4
3.9 0.0
0.0 0.1
0.2 1.3
5.4 6.2
#11
type B
#10
type B
1.3 25'-0"0.9
1.2 0.5
0.3 0.3
0.3 0.3
0.3 0.3
0.3 0.3
0.3 0.8
4.3 5.9
0.7 0.4
0.3 0.3
0.2 0.2
0.3 0.3
0.3 0.2
0.3 0.8
3.6 4.7
3.9 1.7
1.1 2.3
6.1 6.2
2.2 0.6
1.7 4.6
4.6 1.3
0.4 0.6
2.3 2.0
0.5 0.2
0.2 2.8
0.6 0.2
4.1 0.7
0.3 1.1
1.9 0.3
0.3 2.0
6.0 0.4
0.2 0.3
1.0 3.5
0.5 0.2
0.2 0.3
1.2 2.5
4.6 6.4
3.7 3.1
4.7 5.4
3.1 0.9
1.3 3.7
4.0 2.0
2.6 1.4
0.3 0.1
0.1 0.3
0.7 2.5
4.5 2.8
1.0 1.2
1.8 1.0
0.7 0.7
0.9 1.0
0.8 0.8
1.8 0.3
0.1 0.1
0.1 0.2
0.4 0.8
0.6 0.3
0.5 0.8
1.3 1.4
1.0 0.9
0.3 0.1
0.1 0.1
0.1 0.2
0.2 0.2
0.2 0.4
1.0 2.8
3.5 1.6
0.9 1.5
3.2 2.7
1.0 0.3
0.2 0.2
0.2 1.9
0.5 0.3
0.3 0.4
1.3 0.7
0.8 1.0
1.0 1.1
1.0 1.0
0.9 0.8
0.8 1.4
2.6 2.8
1.8 1.3
1.9 3.1
2.7 0.7
1.1 2.2
4.4 3.3
2.4 2.6
1.1 1.4
3.1 8.1
5.3 3.1
3.6 2.9
1.5 1.9
2.9 5.0
1.8 1.9
2.6 3.5
1.8 3.2
7.8 3.0
1.9 2.8
5.4 4.8
2.8 2.1
2.5 2.4
2.4 2.3
6.3 3.3
3.0 5.9
4.3 3.0
3.3 3.8
2.0 3.0
7.1 4.8
2.9 3.3
1.0 0.7
1.0 1.3
1.2 1.3
1.2 1.3
1.1 0.9
1.2 4.2
2.8 1.7
2.6 5.4
3.9 2.6
2.9 5.0
3.1 3.3
7.4 5.0
3.1 3.5
6.2 3.0
2.1 2.5
3.9 1.9
2.1 3.1
2.8 1.8
3.4 8.4
4.7 2.0
2.6 4.6
3.8 1.7
2.0 2.7
2.6 2.6
2.5 1.5
1.7 3.4
7.2 5.3
3.7 4.0
1.0 1.9
3.9 7.9
5.9 4.3
4.6 1.6
1.9 3.9
2.4 1.7
3.1 6.2
1.6 1.3
1.8 2.3
2.3 2.4
2.3 1.2
1.4 2.4
4.2 3.5
2.8 2.9
1.9 1.6
3.4 8.6
2.3 1.4
2.2 3.4
1.3 1.3
2.1 3.1
0.9 1.5
3.3 8.3
2.0 1.5
2.5 4.7
3.7 2.9
3.0 4.7
3.4 2.6
5.3 6.6
4.3 1.7
1.7 2.2
4.3 1.8
2.6 5.4
4.0 2.9
3.1 2.4
1.6 3.0
7.6 5.0
3.0 3.4
3.7 1.7
1.5 2.1
1.9 1.7
1.7 6.3
2.5 0.8
0.6 0.6
0.7 0.7
0.6 0.6
0.6 0.6
1.3 4.4
4.9 1.7
0.7 0.6
0.7 0.7
0.7 0.7
0.7 0.8
0.9 1.8
5.7 2.0
0.9 0.7
0.7 0.7
1.0 1.2
1.2 1.1
0.9 1.1
1.9 3.5
3.8 2.4
2.5 3.8
3.1 2.1
84 85
TR#3D
0.3 0.5
0.8 1.1
1.7 1.9
1.3 1.0
0.9 1.7
6.0 6.3
2.1 0.2
0.2 0.2
0.2 0.6
0.8 0.3
0.3 0.5
1.2 2.7
2.8 1.6
1.9 3.1
2.2 1.5
25'-.30" 0 8.5
D
7 D
0 71 72 73
D
74 75 7
D
6 D
33 34 35
2.8 D
36 5.5
37 3.7
38 D
39 40 41 42
D
43 44
3.0 45
2.9 D
46 47 4
D
8 49 LOADING ZONE 0.5 1.2 4.4
1 2.6
2.4 2.4
2.5 5.2 4.1
3.0 3.2
2.4 2.3
2.2 6.1
4.2 4.6
4.7 5.6
3.4 3.9
5.5 3.4
3.8 2.1
2.2 2.1
T0.2 R #0.4 4
2.4 2.3
3.3 3.7
2.5 2.5
3.4 3.9
3.0 3.0
3.4 3.7
2.7 2.7
2.6 2.6
D
0.2 0.2
0.2 0.3
0.4 1.3
5.3 0.4
0.3 0.4
0.4 0.6
1.3 3.3
4.3 2.0
1.1 2.0
4.5 4.4 WALKWAY 7D78.1 782.9 7
2 9
.7
8 7.8
0 5.
8 4
1 2.5 82 5.9 8 3D 7.1 5.4 53 7.4 542.5 5 53.1 5
8.64 57 2.758 7.2 59 7.9 8.560 6.2 61 2.3 624.2 638.5 643.4 6
3.51 8
6 .36 2.267 5.4 6D8 7.5 69 2.10.0 0.0
D D D D D D D BOLLARDS
3.1 1.7
1.0 1.5
3.4 3.8
1.9 5.0
2.2 1.1
1.7 6.2
2.4 1.6
1.1 1.6
3.9 4.5
2.1 1.3
2.2 4.4
3.4 2.2
1.6 1.1
1.5 3.0
3.6 2.1
1.4 2.0
3.5 2.9
4.9 2.2
1.1 1.4
3.8 6.2
2.5 3.7
2.0 1.0
1.2 4.0
2.0 1.5
0.9 1.0
2.1 2.8
1.5 0.9
1.4 2.6
2.1 4.0
2.0 0.9
0.7 0.9
1.0 0.7
0.6 0.7
0.9 0.9
4.5 1.9
0.8 0.5
0.4 0.4
0.3 0.3
0.3 0.3
0.4 3.6
1.9 2.2
5.9 4.7
2.2 1.8
4.2 2.1
1.5 1.0
1.8 2.5 5.2
2.2 1.2
2.9 2.2
1.7 1.2
2.8 4.9
2.4 1.2
1.8 5.5
2.8 1.5
3.9 5.7 4.3
2.2 1.1
1.9 1.9
1.5 0.9
1.0 3.1
1.9 1.3
3.5 5.3
2.4 2.3
5.8 2.7 2.5
1.8 1.8
4.1 5.2 1.9
1.7 3.0
3.6 3.7
2.0 1.2
1.7 4.8
2.0 0.9
0.9 0.8
0.9 0.8
0.8 0.9
0.9 0.8
1.7 1.2
0.8 1.0
1.9 2.1
1.4 1.5
2.2 1.9
1.3 0.0 0.0
1.6 0.8
1.0 2.7
1.6 4.2
1.9 2.0
4.6 2.7
4.0 5.2
0.0 0.0
BUILDING
0.1 SC0. NCES
0.0 O0
0.1 0.1
0.1 0.1
0.1 0.1
0.1 0.1
0.1 0.1
0.1 0.1
0.2 0.2
0.2 0.1
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
86 8.0
92 7.7
98 7.2
25 24
5.3 32 7.0
2.2 31 87 2.5
2.2 93
2.2 99
2.4 250'.-70" 881.0
1.2 941.1
2.1 952.5
1.2 1001.0
2.1 1012.0 #12
2.4 5.7
3.9 1.9
2.8 7.5
4.8 2.1
2.8 23 2.8
6.0 22 7.7
30 #9 0.9
1.3 1.2
89 2.1
29 28
7.6 4.3 8.3 5.9 6.5
type B
3.7 21
4.1 90 96 102
type B 5.6 3.7 3.3 5.4 4.3 4.5 2.0 1.9
' " MATCHLINE SEE SHEET EP-02
LIGHTING FIXTURE LEGEND
LED WALL PACK
3000° KELVIN
A3 LED POST LIGHT - 18FT POLE LED POST LIGHT - 12FT POLE TYPE _ LIGHTING DISTRIBUTION
3000° KELVIN
LED TRELLIS LIGHT
3000° KELVIN
LED CARPORT LIGHT
3000° KELVIN
LED PALM TREE RING MOUNTED
UPLIGHTS
3000° KELVIN
TYPE _ LIGHTING DISTRIBUTION
W/ MOTIONS RESPONSE SENSOR
3000° KELVIN
B C D
SCALE: 1" = 20'-0"
CANDELA Engineering Inc.
EP-01 27201 Calle Juanita
Dana Point, CA 92624
Ph. 949.201.1333
LIGHTING DESIGN | ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING candelaengineering.com PROJECT: THE WREN ARCHITECT: VELY ZAJEC, [email protected], 949.468.5866 OWNER: STEFAN VOGEL, [email protected], 626.277.6782 ROSEMOUNT AVE., CATHEDRAL CITY, APN 670-110-043 HUMPHREYS & PARTNERS ARCHITECTS, L.P. COACHELLA VALLEY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT GROUP PARTIAL PHOTOMETRIC SITE PLAN HPA PROJECT# 2023158 PLANNING # 23-001 5339 Alpha Rd., Suite 300, Dallas, TX 75240 | 972.701.9636 | www.humphreys.com 36101 BOB HOPE DRIVE, SUITE E5, RANCHO MIRAGE, CA 92270 MATCHLINE SEE SHEET EP-01 type B 21
20 19
90 96 102 28
type B 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.1 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.1 0.2
0.1 0.1
0.1 0.1
0.1 0.1
0.1 0.1
0.1 0.1
0.1 0.1
0.1 0.1
0.1 0.1
0.1 0.1
0.1 0.1
0.1 0.1
0.1 0.1
0.1 0.1
0.1 0.1
0.1 0.1
0.1 0.1
0.1 0.1
0.1 0.6
1.1 0.6
0.2 0.2
0.4 0.5
0.3 0.1
0.2 0.4
0.6 0.3
0.2 0.4
0.5 0.3
0.1 0.2
0.4 0.6
0.3 0.1
0.2 0.7
1.0 3.1
5.2 3.4
0.8 0.7
2.2 3.4
1.7 0.4
0.7 2.3
3.6 2.0
0.8 1.9
3.3 1.9
0.5 0.6
2.1 3.7
2.0 0.5
1.0 3.2
5.1 3.1
2.5 4.6
4.1 1.5
0.5 1.6
3.2 2.2
0.6 0.4
3.7 6.5
4.3 2.1
2.0 3.7
6.5 4.4
1.3 1.9
3.8 6.7
5.7 2.8
3.7 6.6
4.6 1.6
1.7 3.6
6.5 4.6
1.7 2.1
3.7 6.5
5.1 4.0
5.7 5.1
3.2 1.4
3.4 6.2
4.7 2.1
1.3 2.6
4.5 2.7
0.8 1.2
4.3 5.6
3.7 4.1
5.5 5.5
3.2 2.0
0.6 0.6
3.5 5.6
5.2 3.4
4.3 5.7
3.8 1.5
0.7 2.6
4.3 2.5
2.0 4.1
3.4 1.3
0.7 3.3
5.7 4.4
3.2 4.9
0.8 1.0
0.6 0.3
0.4 0.9
1.7 0.9
1.5 3.9
4.1 1.7
0.4 0.2
0.3 1.4
4.0 3.9
1.7 0.9
1.6 1.1
0.4 0.3
0.5 0.8
0.5 0.4
0.7 0.8
0.6 0.6
1.0 1.9
1.6 1.1
2.9 1.2
0.7 0.4
0.3 0.5
0.7 0.5
0.4 0.4
0.8 0.9
0.4 0.2
0.2 0.2
0.3 0.7
0.8 2.7
1.0 0.5
0.9 2.3
3.2 1.5
0.6 1.1
1.0 0.4
0.2 0.4
0.5 0.3
0.3 0.5
0.5 0.3
0.2 0.4
1.1 0.9
0.5 1.6
3.5 2.9
0.9 0.3
0.5 1.4
3.2 2.5
1.0 0.7
1.2 2.8
5.6 3.7 2.7
1.3 0.5
3.3 1.2
0.5 5.4 3.4
1.3 0.5
2.9 1.3
0.5 4.3
1.2 0.4
4.5 2.1
1.0 0.8
0.9 1.1
4.3 6.1
4.7 2.7
1.2 4.0
5.9 4.6
2.7 1.6
3.3 5.7
3.6 4.2
4.6 5.6
2.4 1.4
3.3 5.3
5.5 3.0
1.3 3.6
5.6 5.7
3.4 1.3
1.0 1.6
2.8 3.9
2.9 1.7
0.9 0.4
0.5 2.5
5.6 3.9
1.4 0.5
1.7 4.3
3.5 1.3
0.8 3.6
5.7 4.0
3.1 4.8
5.3 2.9
0.8 1.4
3.9 4.3
1.9 0.6
1.4 4.0
4.3 2.0
0.7 0.8
1.1 1.8
2.2 1.8
1.1 0.7
0.2 0.5
1.3 4.2
2.4 0.5
0.2 0.3
0.7 0.7
0.3 0.3
0.8 1.7
1.2 0.7
1.2 1.7
0.7 0.3
0.4 0.8
1.0 0.5
0.4 0.5
0.9 1.1
0.6 0.4
0.4 0.3
0.5 0.1
0.5 0.2
0.3 0.8
1.0 1.8
2.8 0.9
0.3 0.1
0.1 0.1
0.2 0.7
2.5 1.3
1.8 2.2
1.4 0.6
0.3 0.1
0.1 0.1
0.3 1.7
4.7 1.9
3.7 5.6
2.0 0.6
0.3 0.1
0.1 0.1
0.4 2.7
6.3 2.1
4.5 7.4
2.3 0.7
0.3 0.2
0.1 0.1
0.3 1.4
3.4 2.1
3.0 3.6
1.9 0.9
0.5 0.3
0.2 0.1
0.2 0.5
1.6 2.1
2.8 3.0
1.7 0.9
0.6 0.4
0.3 0.2
0.3 1.8
3.3 2.0
4.3 5.6
2.0 0.8
0.7 0.6
0.5 0.4
1.0 4.5
5.1 1.9
4.9 7.0
2.1 0.8
0.6 0.7
0.7 0.7
1.5 4.6
5.3 1.5
2.5 2.9
1.5 0.7
0.5 0.6
0.9 1.0
1.1 2.6
2.7 0.3
0.2 0.2
1.1 3.1
6.6 5.8
7.0 2.8
1.5 0.4
0.1 0.1
0.2 0.8
3.0 5.3
6.9 6.6
4.8 2.2
0.7 0.2
0.3 1.2
0.9 1.0
1.1 0.8
0.5 0.5
0.7 1.1
1.3 1.4
1.3 1.4
0.2 0.1
0.2 0.7
4.0 6.9
8.1 7.6
4.0 1.4
0.4 0.3
0.3 0.3
0.6 2.9
5.8 7.3
7.6 5.1
2.4 0.5
0.2 0.1
0.4 0.4
0.4 0.4
0.3 0.3
0.4 0.8
1.5 2.7
2.5 1.6
1.0 0.6
0.3 0.1
0.3 1.0
2.3 2.4
2.5 1.6
1.0 0.8
0.9 0.9
0.9 0.9
0.1 0.1
0.1 0.1
0.1 0.1
0.3 1.1
2.8 3.7
2.1 1.2
0.7 0.5
0.3 0.3
0.4 0.6
0.8 0.9
1.0 1.1
1.3 1.7
1.7 1.4
1.2 0.1
0.1 0.1
0.1 0.1
0.1 0.3
0.7 1.3
2.0 1.8
1.0 0.8
0.7 0.5
0.4 0.4
0.4 0.5
0.5 0.7
1.0 2.0
3.1 3.4
2.2 1.3
0.9 0.8
0.8 0.8
0.8 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.1 0.1
0.1 0.2
0.4 0.5
0.6 0.9
0.7 0.5
0.5 0.5
0.4 0.4
0.4 0.4
0.4 0.5
0.9 1.5
2.5 2.7
1.7 1.1
0.8 0.6
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.1
0.1 0.2
0.2 0.1
0.3 0.4
0.4 0.4
0.4 0.3
0.3 0.3
0.3 0.3
0.3 0.4
0.4 0.7
0.8 0.4
0.5 0.4
0.5 0.6
0.6 0.7
0.9 1.7
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.1 0.1
0.1 0.1
0.1 0.2
0.3 0.3
0.3 0.2
0.2 0.2
0.1 0.1
0.1 0.1
0.2 0.4
0.4 0.3
0.1 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.1 0.2
0.2 0.1
0.1 0.1
0.1 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.1 0.1
0.1 0.2
0.1 0.1
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.1 0.1
0.1 0.1
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.1 0.1
0.1 0.1
0.1 0.1
0.1 0.1
0.1 0.1
0.1 0.1
0.3 0.4
0.3 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.1
0.1 0.1
0.1 0.1
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.1 0.1
0.1 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 18'-0"
91 97 103
1.1 27
26 1.3
0.7 2.2
4.0 6.4
4.5 2.4
4.2 4.5
1.9 0.6
1.5 2.7
1.6 1.0
2.1 2.6
1.1 0.5
1.9 4.3
4.5 2.5
3.4 5.8
5.1 2.7
0.5 1.3
0.7 1.3
0.4 0.5
6.5 3.2
0.6 0.2
0.1 0.2
0.2 0.3
0.7 2.3
4.7 2.0
0.4 0.2
0.2 1.8
0.5 0.2
0.5 1.0
0.9 1.5
0.5 0.3
1.6 3.5
1.9 0.5
1.1 2.9
6.5 3.5
0.7 1.7
4.7 2.1
0.5 1.0
2.3 1.8
0.6 0.3
1.8 2.0
0.9 0.3
1.3 2.6
2.3 2.5
1.5 1.5
1.8 2.1
1.5 1.3
1.0 0.9
1.1 1.0
0.6 0.8
1.1 1.7
3.5 3.0
0.7 0.5
1.1 1.1
0.9 1.7
1.9 1.2
2.2 2.7
2.4 2.5
2.4 2.0
2.4 2.0
2.3 1.4
3.2 6.6
5.0 1.3
2.3 3.6
4.7 2.1
1.2 1.2
0.7 0.9
1.5 1.7
2.5 3.3
1.3 1.6
1.6 2.5
0.7 1.0
0.7 1.2
1.1 0.8
1.1 2.1
5.1 3.2
0.7 1.9
4.8 5.6
3.0 0.9
0.4 0.3
0.3 0.3
0.4 0.9
0.8 0.3
0.3 0.3
0.3 0.4
0.4 0.4
1.6 1.4
4.2 2.4
0.5 0.5
1.4 2.0
0.9 0.4
0.4 0.4
0.6 1.0
1.5 2.1
2.0 1.3
0.9 0.5
0.4 0.4
0.4 0.4
0.5 0.8
0.8 0.9
1.2 1.8
2.2 1.9
5.5 4.4
1.1 0.3
0.3 0.4
0.4 0.4
0.5 0.5
0.7 5.3
4.2 0.8
0.2 0.1
0.2 0.3
0.4 0.5
0.7 1.0
3.5 1.6
0.3 0.1
0.1 0.2
0.3 0.5
0.7 0.8
1.6 1.4
0.5 0.2
0.1 0.1
0.2 0.3
0.9 1.8
1.5 3.8
6.6 6.1
5.1 8.2
8.4 8.3
5.1 2.0
0.6 0.4
0.4 0.5
1.2 3.5
6.6 8.5
8.5 6.1
3.5 0.8
0.5 0.5
1.0 3.3
1.4 0.3
0.1 0.1
0.2 0.7
3.5 4.3
6.0 3.1
0.5 0.1
0.1 0.2
1.3 5.4
6.4 4.9
2.3 0.4
0.1 0.1
0.2 0.8
3.3 3.3
2.3 0.7
0.2 0.1
0.1 0.1
0.2 1.1
1.9 1.2
0.4 0.2
0.1 0.1
0.1 0.2
0.6 2.0
3.3 1.5
0.3 0.1
0.1 0.1
0.3 1.7
4.6 6.1
3.3 0.6
0.1 0.1
0.1 0.4
2.6 6.2
5.1 2.5
0.5 0.1
0.1 0.1
0.3 1.3
3.5 4C.0 C
4.2 3C.5
POOL EQUIPMENT ROOM TRELLIS 0.2 3.7 2.9
2.5 1.0
(TBCD)
4.1 2.4
2.0 0.8
0.8 0.9
0.8 0.6
0.4 0.3
0.2 0.2
0.2 0.2
0.4 0.5
0.8 1.1
1.4 1.6
1.5 2.5
5.7 3.3
EQU
AVIP.
S C C H
B
INO
I
OBKPBE
&
1.3 3.1
1.8 2.7
1.7 2.7
1.9 1.4
3.3 3.1 3.1
1.1 1.1
1.3 1.3
0.9 0.7
0.4 0.4
0.4 0.4
0.3 0.4
0.7 1.0
A
A
A
A
1.5 0.8 A
A
A
A
A
KIDDY 1.
F
2 OU0.N
8 TAIN
0.7 4.0
3.3 1.4
6.3 4.8
1.4 5.0
3.8 0.7
2.8 1.1
0.2 0.7
0.3 0.1
2.0 1.0
0.2 3.7
3.2 0.7
6.4 4.9
1.0 4.5
2.7 0.5
1.0 0.7
0.7 0.6
0.4 0.2
0.1 0.2
0.7 0.7
0.5 0.3
0.2 0.1
0.1 0.6 8 x 81.5PLAN1T.6 ERS1.0
TYP.
#7 0.5
1.5 1.8
2.4 1.2
1.8 0.9
1.2 1.0
1.1 2.1
1.0 0.6
0.5 0.6
0.8 0.5
0.8 1.2 0.9
0.5 0.2
0.3 0.4
0.4 0.4
0.8 0.9
1.0 1.3
1.6 1.8
1.7 2.6
6.6 1.3 171.3 182.7
1.8 2.1
2.6 2.2
3.2 3.4
3.1 2.7
3.8 4.1
3.7 2.1
0.9 1.3
0.9 0.7
0.9 1.2
1.2 1.3
1.6 1.7
1.9 2.1
2.3 2.4
1.8 2.1
2.4 3.7
3.5 2.1
1.2 0.7
0.5 0.5
0.4 0.4
0.5 0.5
0.7 0.9
1.7 2.8
4.0 3.0
1.7 2.4
2.5 1.9
1.5 1.1
0.7 0.6
0.5 0.5
0.5 0.6
0.9 2.4
3.4 5.2
4.8 4.5
2.8 1.0
0.6 0.5
0.5 0.6
0.8 2.0
4.2 4.8
4.8 4.0
1.9 0.9
0.7 0.6
0.7 type B #6
type A 0.4
25'-0"
0.3 POOL
0.3 0.3
0.3 0.2
0.4 0.7
0.5 0.3
0.3 0.4
0.8 1.3
1.2 0.9
0.7 0.9
1.5 0.2 0.1
30 x 75
0.37 0.2
0.4 0.5
0.7 1.0
1.5 0.4
0.6 0.8
1.1 1.5
1.8 1.7
2.6 6.4
1.1 0.4
0.3 0.3
0.4 0.6
1.3 0.9
0.3 0.3
0.4 1.2
2.4 3.3
0.9 0.5
2.1 4.5
5.9 5.9
1.9 0.9
4.3 6.5
4.9 5.9
1.5 0.8
3.3 5.7
4.6 5.1
1.6 0.8
3.6 6.5
5.4 6.2
2.0 1.1
4.5 6.6
3.4 4.2
1.0 0.6
2.4 3.6
3.0 2.8
0.8 0.4
1.1 3.5
4.1 4.6
1.6 0.7
3.0 4.9
5.3 5.7
1.8 1.0
4.4 6.5
5.1 4.9
1.0 0.7
3.0 6.2
4.9 4.6
1.5 0.8
3.7 6.3
5.3 5.2
1.5 0.9
4.0 5.8
3.3 2.8
0.5 0.4
1.7 3.2
0.8 0.4
0.2 0.2
0.3 1.0
8 x 8 PLANTERS
T1.3YP. 2.0 A 2.9
1.6 1.0
0.9 2.1
1.4 1.3
1.3 2.8
6.7 1.7
1.2 1.1
2.5 #8
type B
1 0
2.1'-0" 150'
.
-
5 0" B1.7
0.5 2.7
6.6 A SPA
0.1 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.4 1.1
0.8 0.2
0.1 0.3
0.5 0.3
0.1 0.1
0.9 1.225'-0" 1.1 0.249'-0" 0.1
25'-0"
0.4 0.6
1.7 4.3
3.2 1.2
0.8 1.5
4.2 0.3
0.6 1.3
2.2 2.0
1.1 0.9
1.4 2.3
0.3 0.6
1.3 2.2
1.8 1.0
0.8 1.3
2.3 0.2 0.2 0.2
0.5 1.5
3.2 2.3
0.9 0.6
1.3 2.8
0.5 0.7
1.1 1.6
1.4 0.9
0.8 1.0
1.3 0.7
0.7 0.9
0.9 0.9
0.7 0.6
1.4 1.7
2.2 2.5
1.9 2.1
2.5 2.3
1.9 0.7
0.2 0.1
0.1 0.1
1.1 1.1
0.9 0.7
0.5 0.3
0.3 0.3
0.3 0.2
0.4 0.4
0.5 0.8
1.3 2.1
2.7 1.9
0.2 0.2
0.2 0.3
0.3 0.3
0.5 0.0
0.4 83'-0"
100.5 4 0.6112 0.5
1.9113 2.4
3.8 5.8
C
C
5.7 C
4.7 0.8
0.8 0.9
C C
+/C
D
-8
E
4 C0KSF
C C
#5
type A
MAIL AND
DELIVERIES
0.9 12
0 .1 52.1
ELEC3.5R
S
O
F
OM
0.7 0.2
0.6 SERVINGWPOOL DECK
215 SF
7.9 4.7 8.0
4.3 1.0
0.6 1.8
1.1120 1.2
106 114 PARCELS
PRIVATE EVENTS
1,380 SF
FA
G
MAIMLYEL
R
OU
OOM
NG/E/ KSITH
C
O
H
WEN
MAIL RO
4 OM: F204 UNITS
38 S
5.0 3.0
1.2121 1.7
1.3122 2.1
SERVING PMOOL DECK
215 SF
0.8 161.1
107 115 CLUB 1.2 1.0 I . 0.8
0.9 0.9
1.2 B
V
A
I
T
S
H
IT
R
O
O
R
O
S
108 15 EVR
0.7 116
0.7 1.1 1.7
1.2 0.9
HOUSE
1.6 2.8
123 14 EVR
109
1.7 1.7117 1.0
WO13RKSR
F
OOM
FC
I
OTNV+/E-6RSSE
0 D
D
EOF
C
U
K
TDOOR
1.8 3.6
124 8 0 S
MATCHLINE SEE SHEET EP-03 FINITCNLUESSGCYEOGN TRER 1.0 1 31.5EVR 161.6 0 4.8118 6.6 0.9 2.6
DIN A M
+/-1745 SF
LIGHTING FIXTURE LEGEND
LED WALL PACK
3000° KELVIN
A3 LED POST LIGHT - 18FT POLE LED POST LIGHT - 12FT POLE TYPE _ LIGHTING DISTRIBUTION
3000° KELVIN
LED TRELLIS LIGHT
3000° KELVIN
LED CARPORT LIGHT
3000° KELVIN
LED PALM TREE RING MOUNTED
UPLIGHTS
3000° KELVIN
TYPE _ LIGHTING DISTRIBUTION
W/ MOTIONS RESPONSE SENSOR
3000° KELVIN
B C D
SCALE: 1" = 20'-0"
CANDELA Engineering Inc.
EP-02 27201 Calle Juanita
Dana Point, CA 92624
Ph. 949.201.1333
LIGHTING DESIGN | ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING candelaengineering.com PROJECT: THE WREN ARCHITECT: VELY ZAJEC, [email protected], 949.468.5866 OWNER: STEFAN VOGEL, [email protected], 626.277.6782 ROSEMOUNT AVE., CATHEDRAL CITY, APN 670-110-043 HUMPHREYS & PARTNERS ARCHITECTS, L.P. COACHELLA VALLEY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT GROUP PARTIAL PHOTOMETRIC SITE PLAN HPA PROJECT# 2023158 PLANNING # 23-001 5339 Alpha Rd., Suite 300, Dallas, TX 75240 | 972.701.9636 | www.humphreys.com 36101 BOB HOPE DRIVE, SUITE E5, RANCHO MIRAGE, CA 92270 MAT C
H
HL
O
IN
U
S E
S
E
E
SHEE ET EP- 02
109 117
1.8 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.1 0.1
0.1 0.1
0.1 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.1 0.1
0.1 0.1
0.1 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.1
0.1 0.1
0.1 0.1
0.1 0.0
0.0 0.1
0.1 0.3
0.6 0.4
0.1 0.1
0.1 0.1
0.1 0.1
0.1 0.2
0.1 0.1
0.2 0.5
0.5 0.2
0.1 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.1 0.1
0.3 0.5
0.4 0.2
0.1 0.1
0.1 0.4
2.0 4.0
2.6 0.6
0.2 0.7
1.1 0.5
0.2 0.7
1.2 0.6
0.4 1.7
3.5 2.5
0.7 0.1
0.1 0.3
1.3 3.4
6.3 4.7
2.0 1.2
3.2 5.1
3.0 1.4
3.2 5.2
3.3 1.1
2.4 4.3
6.1 4.1
0.7 0.1
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
2.1 1.3
3.4 6.3
5.3 2.4
0.4 0.1
0.2 0.7
3.2 4.9
6.6 3.8
2.4 0.7
0.3 0.3
0.4 0.9
0.7 1.0
4.3 6.4
4.9 6.5
6.7 4.0
3.4 4.9
6.8 6.0
6.6 6.1
3.3 1.0
1.0 1.1
1.2 1.7
1.1 0.2
0.1 0.1
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 1.1
2.9 5.0
3.1 1.0
0.4 0.4
0.3 0.4
0.4 0.3
0.3 1.7
3.7 2.8
2.7 4.2
2.8 1.2
2.5 4.3
3.1 3.1
3.4 1.5
0.3 0.5
1.0 1.7
0.9 1.5
1.8 1.2
0.6 0.4
0.4 0.5
0.5 0.3
0.2 1.2
2.8 2.7
1.1 0.6
0.5 0.5
0.6 0.5
0.4 0.2
0.3 0.9
2.0 1.5
1.5 2.4
1.5 0.7
1.3 2.3
1.7 1.8
1.9 0.7
0.2 0.5
1.0 1.6
2.8 1.8
0.4 0.2
0.1 0.1
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
1.7 1.5
4.2 4.0
1.4 0.7
0.8 0.9
0.9 1.0
1.7 1.4
2.3 2.3
1.2 0.7
1.3 2.3
2.2 1.3
0.8 1.7 1.3
2.8 2.6
1.1 0.6
1.4 1.9
1.5 2.2
3.9 1.0
1.3 1.3
0.8 0.7
1.0 1.1
1.1 1.0
1.5 1.0
124
1.2 0.9
0.8 0.6
0.6 0.6
0.6 0.6
0.6 0.4
1.7 0.9
0.6 0.5
0.6 0.5
0.5 0.5
0.5 0.5
1.1 0.7
0.4 0.4
0.4 0.4
0.4 0.4
0.4 1.2
4.1 6.2
4.1 2.4
1.7 4.5
6.4 3.6
2.2 4.5
6.3 3.6
1.6 2.4
4.3 6.1
2.9 1.2
0.2 0.1
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.2
0.3 0.2
0.3 0.3
0.3 0.3
0.3 0.3
0.6 3.1
5.6 4.0
1.6 0.6
1.4 2.5
1.4 0.7
1.3 2.3
1.3 0.5
1.2 4.1
5.2 2.8
0.7 0.1
0.1 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
FCIOTNV+/E-6RSSE
0 D
D
EOF
C
U
K
TDOOR
0.6 0.7
0.8 0.5
1.0 2.0
1.0 0.7
0.8 1.0
1.5 4.1
8.7 0.3
1.2 3.7
1.3 0.5
0.3 0.3
0.3 0.2
0.3 0.1
0.4 0.6
0.3 0.3
0.2 0.2
0.3 0.4
1.3 0.1
0.1 0.2
0.5 1.0
0.8 0.4
0.8 1.8
1.7 2.9
4.9 3.2
1.0 0.4
1.1 1.9
0.9 0.5
1.0 1.8
0.9 0.4
1.1 3.7
4.7 2.3
0.5 0.1
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.3 0.3
0.7 2.3
4.8 4.0
1.8 3.0
5.2 4.9
2.3 1.1
0.7 0.2
0.1 0.2
0.3 0.2
0.1 0.2
0.3 0.2
0.1 0.2
0.7 1.0
0.4 0.1
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.9 1.8 3.6 2.7
1.9 1.2
0.7 0.4
0.4 0.3
0.2 0.1
0.1 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.4
0.3 0.3
0.2 0.2
0.2 0.1
0.1 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.4
0.3 0.1
0.1 0.0
0.1 0.1
0.1 0.1
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.1 0.1
0.1 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.1
0.1 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
WO13R
8 KSR
F
OOM 0 S
FINITCNLUE
D
S
IN
SGCYEOGN
A
TREM
R
61.6 0 4.8118 6.6 0.9 +/-1745 SF
1.0 131.5EVR
1 2.6
125 L
6 O30BB YF
S
6.2 12 EVR
111
4.1 1.5
0.4 2.4
4.0 2.5
4.3 8.4
5.5 1.5
0.8 2.0
3.1 2.2
4.1 8.0
0.9 0.7
0.7 0.7
0.8 0.8
0.7 0.6
0.4 0.3
0.2 0.3
0.8 1.3
2.4 5.0
0.5 0.4
0.3 0.3
0.7 1.4
3.7 7.2
4.0 2.8
1.9 7.0
4.7 3.6
8.0 5.0
3.1 1.9
1.4 1.9
1.4 4.0
2.0 5.2
1.8 2.8
0.9 0.8
0.7 0.7
0.7 0.9
2.2 1.8
0.9 1.0
1.1 1.0
1.1 2.4
5.1 3.9
1.9 2.4
4.7 3.1
2.1 3.9
8.6 5.4
2.3 3.2
8.0 4.7
2.4 4.0
8.4 3.0
1.4 1.9
2.7 2.2
1.9 3.6
7.0 1.3
1.2 1.8
3.1 2.2
3.1 5.1
3.7 2.5
6.0 3.5
1.2 1.0
0.9 0.7
0.4 0.2
1.7 3.7
6.4 5.5
3.9 2.7
5.1 4.4
2.6 0.5
0.1 0.1
0.1 0.1
0.1 0.1
0.1 0.1
0.1 0.1
0.1 0.1
0.1 0.1
0.1 0.1
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 1.3
1.3 1.9
1.6 0.9
0.6 1.5
0.9 0.8
0.7 0.5
0.4 119
CON23F
3 ESRF
ENCE 215 SF
LEASING CENTER
10 1.5
Y+O/- G
2 A70RSOF
OM +/- 200 SF
ZEN GARDEN 0.5
0.5 0.5
0.6 0.7
0.6 0.5
0.3 0.8
3.2 5.9
5.6 4.8
6.3 4.8
2.6 3.7
6.6 6.3
5.3 5.7
3.2 0.5
0.7 1.0
1.2 1.6
1.1 0.2
0.1 0.1
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.3
0.3 0.4
0.4 0.5
0.7 1.1
2.2 1.7
0.8 0.6
0.6 0.6
0.5 0.3
0.3 0.4
0.3 0.2
0.2 0.8
1.3 0.5
0.1 0.1
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.3 0.6
0.5 0.5
0.6 0.8
1.2 2.2
3.2 2.9
1.8 1.0
0.6 0.5
0.5 0.4
0.3 0.3
0.2 0.2
0.2 0.1
0.1 0.1
0.1 0.1
0.1 0.1
0.1 0.2
0.2 0.2
0.1 0.1
0.0 0.0
1.2 0.6
0.7 0.8
1.0 1.2
1.4 1.6
1.5 1.2
1.0 0.8
0.6 0.5
0.4 0.4
0.3 0.3
0.4 0.5
0.5 0.6
0.7 0.7
0.7 0.6
0.5 0.5
0.4 0.3
0.2 0.2
0.1 0.0
0.0 1.3
0.6 0.7
0.7 0.8
0.9 0.9
0.9 0.8
0.7 0.7
0.5 0.4
0.4 0.4
0.4 0.4
0.5 0.6
1.1 0.5
0.6 0.6
0.5 0.4
0.4 0.3
0.2 0.2
0.2 0.2
0.3 0.3
0.3 0.3
0.4 0.4
0.5 0.6
0.8 1.2
2.1 2.9
2.4 1.5
0.8 0.6
0.5 0.4
0.3 0.2
0.1 0.0
0.0 0.9
0.4 0.5
0.6 0.5
0.5 0.6
0.9 0.5
0.2 0.2
0.2 0.2
0.2 0.3
0.4 0.5
0.5 0.5
0.6 1.3
2.0 2.6
3.4 2.8
1.6 0.9
0.5 0.4
0.3 0.2
0.1 0.1
0.0 0.0
0.3 0.3
0.5 0.8
0.7 0.9
2.5 4.6
3.2 0.8
0.3 0.9
1.5 0.7
0.4 0.9
1.7 1.0
0.6 1.3
3.6 5.0
2.8 1.6
1.1 0.7
0.6 0.3
0.3 0.2
0.2 0.1
0.1 0.0
0.0 0.1
0.2 0.6
1.0 1.0
2.0 3.6
6.3 4.7
2.3 1.3
3.5 5.6
3.9 1.6
3.5 5.7
4.2 1.4
2.5 4.2
6.2 4.7
1.4 0.6
0.2 0.1
0.1 0.1
0.1 0.1
0.1 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.1 0.2
0.7 1.2
1.6 1.7
0.1 0.2
0.8 1.5
2.7 2.4
0.1 0.2
0.9 1.7
3.4 3.1
0.2 0.4
0.4 0.7
1.4 3.9
8.4 E
5.0 3.5
1.9 0.9
0.9 0.6
0.8 4.1
6.3 4.8
6.3 6.7
4.2 3.6
5.0 6.8
5.9 6.2
5.9 3.2
0.9 0.7
1.0 1.3
2.8VR 1.EVR2.4EVR2.9 EVR1.5 7
2.0 1.8
1.4 0.7
0.4 0.3
0.3 1.2
2.8 2.3
2.2 3.6
2.5 1.2
2.1 3.4
2.3 2.5
2.7 1.2
0.3 0.4
0.9 1.6
TR#1 3.1
0.7 4.7
1.6 0.5
1.3 5.0
5.3 1.6
0.5 1.6
5.0 2.7
0.6 0.4
1.3 5.2
0.8 2.6 5.0 5.1
1.5 0.7
2.8 6.1
2.4 0.6
0.4 1.2
3.2 1.2
1.6 1.4
2.4 5.1
1.9 2.8
2.1 4.3
8.5 0.3
0.4 0.4
0.7 1.2
2.0 3.2
2.8 1.7
1.0 0.6
0.4 0.4
0.3 0.3
0.2 0.1
0.1 0.1
0.2 0.2
0.1 0.1
0.1 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.1 0.1
0.1 0.0
0.0 0.2
0.8 1.5
2.6 2.6
1 2 3
4.8 3.6
1.8 0.7
0.3 0.2
0.2 0.5
0.8 0.7
0.7 0.9
0.8 0.5
0.7 1.0
0.8 0.8
0.8 0.4
0.2 0.3
1.0 1.8
3.7 4
D
7.4 5.0
2.0 0.7
0.3 0.2
0.4 1.3
2.6 1.9
1.6 2.6
1.7 1.0
1.9 3.1
2.0 2.0
2.4 1.1
0.3 0.4
0.9 1.5
2.7 1.9
0.4 0.3
0.1 0.1
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
5 2.1
1.8 1.2
0.6 0.5
0.4 1.1
3.4 6.4
5.6 4.9
6.4 4.9
3.2 3.9
6.9 6.3
5.0 6.2
3.9 0.7
0.7 1.1
1.3 1.6
1.2 0.3
0.1 0.1
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 6 7
D
8 9
2.6 2.3
1.7 1.8
3.5 1
D
7 0
.7 114.3
3.2 1.6
0.6 0.4
LOADING ZONE 1 D
0.3 0.5
2.6 5.9
25'-.70" 0 1.8
0.8 3.4
8.1 4.8
2.3 1.7
2.9 5.2
2.1 0.9
1.1 126 0.3 0.7
3.5 8.3
TR#2D
0.5127
2.3 1.1
1.0 0.3
0.1 0.1
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.3 0.2
0.1 0.1
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 A3
250'.-20"
0.4 0.8
0.8 0.7
1.0 0.8
0.4 0.6
1.0 0.8
0.8 0.8
0.4 0.2
0.4 1.0
2.0 #1 #2 #3
type A type A type A
63'-0" 15'-0"
0.0 0.5
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.2
0.9 2.8
3.6 1.5
0.2 0.1
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
160.7
0.9 1.0
1.3 1.4
1.3 1.1
0.9 0.7
0.5 0.4
0.3 0.2
0.1 0.0
0.0 1.7
2.3 1.3
0.9 0.7
0.3 0.1
0.1 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
2.8 4.6
2.2 0.8
0.4 0.2
0.1 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 5.5
8.3 3.2
0.8 0.4
0.2 0.1
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
4.9 8.3
2.8 0.8
0.3 0.2
0.1 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 5.9
7.1 2.5
0.6 0.2
0.1 0.1
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
4.7 5.1
1.2 0.4
0.2 0.1
0.1 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 4.6
4.0 1.0
0.2 0.1
0.1 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
6.4 5.2
1.2 0.2
0.1 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 4.2
2.9 0.5
0.1 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
1.6 0.6
0.1 0.1
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 1.7
0.9 0.3
0.2 0.1
0.1 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
3.1 2.4
0.5 0.2
0.1 0.1
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 5.9
4.9 1.3
0.2 0.1
0.1 5.7
4.9 1.1
0.3 0.1
0.1 0.1
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
4.5 4.6
1.3 0.4
0.2 0.1
0.1 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 4.7
6.5 2.7
0.6 0.3
0.2 0.1
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
4.7 8.1
2.9 0.8
0.4 0.2
0.1 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 5.7
7.9 3.1
0.8 0.4
0.2 0.1
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
3.7 5.8
2.4 0.8
0.5 0.3
0.1 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 2.4
2.9 1.5
1.0 0.8
0.3 0.1
0.1 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
1.6 2.8
1.5 0.9
0.7 0.3
0.1 0.1
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 2.9
5.0 2.6
0.9 0.5
0.2 0.1
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
4.8 7.9
3.2 0.9
0.4 0.2
0.1 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 4.5
7.7 2.6
0.7 0.4
0.2 0.1
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
5.6 7.1
2.5 0.6
0.2 0.2
0.1 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 4.8
5.7 1.4
0.4 0.2
0.1 0.1
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
5.3 4.6
1.2 0.3
0.1 0.1
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 5.9
5.1 1.2
0.2 0.1
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
3.9 2.6
0.4 0.1
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 1.2
0.5 0.1
0.1 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
3.1 1.1
0.2 0.1
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.7
0.1 0.1
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 2.0
0.4 0.1
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 4.4
1.1 0.2
0.1 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 5.0
1.1 0.2
0.1 0.1
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 4.5
1.1 0.4
0.2 0.1
0.1 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 5.7
2.3 0.6
0.2 0.2
0.1 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 8.1
2.8 0.7
0.3 0.2
0.1 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 7.9
2.8 0.8
0.4 0.2
0.1 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 6.3
2.5 0.8
0.5 0.2
0.1 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 3.4
1.5 1.0
0.7 0.3
0.1 0.1
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 14
2 2
.8'-0" 3.9 A3 1.7 1422
'-0"
.8
A3
1.8 0.5
0.3 0.1
0.1 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 1.2
0.3 0.1
0.1 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
2.1 2.7
0.0 0.4
0.1 0.1
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.3
0.1 0.1
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.5 0.3
0.1 0.1
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
5' WIDE
SIDEWALK TYP.
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 LIGHTING FIXTURE LEGEND
LED WALL PACK
3000° KELVIN
A3 LED POST LIGHT - 18FT POLE LED POST LIGHT - 12FT POLE TYPE _ LIGHTING DISTRIBUTION
3000° KELVIN
LED TRELLIS LIGHT
3000° KELVIN
LED CARPORT LIGHT
3000° KELVIN
LED PALM TREE RING MOUNTED
UPLIGHTS
3000° KELVIN
TYPE _ LIGHTING DISTRIBUTION
W/ MOTIONS RESPONSE SENSOR
3000° KELVIN
B C D
SCALE: 1" = 20'-0"
CANDELA Engineering Inc.
EP-03 27201 Calle Juanita
Dana Point, CA 92624
Ph. 949.201.1333
LIGHTING DESIGN | ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING candelaengineering.com PROJECT: THE WREN ARCHITECT: VELY ZAJEC, [email protected], 949.468.5866 OWNER: STEFAN VOGEL, [email protected], 626.277.6782 ROSEMOUNT AVE., CATHEDRAL CITY, APN 670-110-043 HUMPHREYS & PARTNERS ARCHITECTS, L.P. COACHELLA VALLEY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT GROUP PARTIAL PHOTOMETRIC SITE PLAN HPA PROJECT# 2023158 PLANNING # 23-001 5339 Alpha Rd., Suite 300, Dallas, TX 75240 | 972.701.9636 | www.humphreys.com 36101 BOB HOPE DRIVE, SUITE E5, RANCHO MIRAGE, CA 92270
IN THE CITY OF CATHEDRAL CITY, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
PRELIMINARY GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN
THE WREN
EXHIBIT DATE: MARCH 4, 2024
PRELIMINARY GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN DATA TABLE
THE WREN
APPLICANT:
ADDRESS:
COACHELLA VALLEY COMMUNITY DEELOPMENT GROUP, INC
36101 BOB HOPE DRIVE, SUITE E5
RANCHO MIRAGE, CA 92270
CONTACT: STEFAN VOGEL TELEPHONE: (626) 277-6782
APN 670-110-043
XXXXX ROSEMOUNT AVENUE
email: [email protected]
LAND OWNER:
ADDRESS:
DESERT CARE, LLC
C/L 31190 CALLE CAYUGA
CATHEDRAL CITY, CA 92234 DATE PALM DRIVE
370 EXIST. R/W BEING A PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 4, SOUTH, RANGE 5, EAST, S.B.B.M. 47' 43'
TOW 369.4
TF 362.4
CONTACT: STEFAN VOGEL TELEPHONE: (626) 277-6782
4' 16'
8' 8'
email: [email protected] FG 363.4
S/W PROP. 6' BLOCK WALL P/L
(TP 363.3)
(TC 363.0)
EXHIBIT PREPARER:
ADDRESS:
CHRISTIANSEN & COMPANY
5225 CANYON CREST DRIVE, SUITE 251
(FL 362.3) RIVERSIDE, CA 92507 TC 360.93
TC 360.36
TP 359.86
TC 360.72
TP 360.22 TP 360.43 TC 360.54
TP 360.14
CONTACT: KEITH CHRISTIANSEN TELEPHONE: (951)323-4713
TELEPHONE: (949)955-4500
TELEPHONE: (760)610-9873
TELEPHONE: (760)360-0665
PROP. FL SWALE
360.6 TC 359.55
FL 359.35 TP 360.45 AC PVMNT TC 360.76 FL 359.95 TC 360.86 TP 360.36
email: [email protected] BLDG 9 PAD=361.0 TP 360.26 FG 360.7 PROP. 8" CURB & GUTTER
ARCHITECT:
ADDRESS:
HUMPHREYS & PARTNERS ARCHITECTS, LP
360 360 2350 BRISTOL STREET
COSTA MESA, CA 92626 P/L
SECTION "A-A" PROP. 6' BLOCK WALL PROP. RECIPROCAL ACCESS ESMT. CONTACT:
25'
VELY ZAJEC
8' SCALE: HORIZ. 1"=40'
VERT. 1"=4'
APN 670-401-016
PE 357.0
email: [email protected]
12.5' 12.5' 6'
PROP.
SIDEWALK
2' 6' 6' PROP.
SIDEWALK EXIST. AC
PAVEMENT
C/L FL
SWALE BLDG. #10 - PE=360.5 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: JSA LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT ADDRESS: 19846 COVENTRY LANE
HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646
SECTION "E-E"
SHARED ACCESS ROAD
RETENTION
BASIN
BOTTOM
350.0
CONTACT: JIM SHROPE
email: [email protected]
NTS
SEE SHEET 2 - ACCESS ROAD CONNECTION TO 30TH AVE.
350 GEOTECHNICAL:
ADDRESS:
LANDMARK CONSULTANTS, INC.
77-948 WILDCAT DRIVE
PALM DESERT, CA 92211
CONTACT: GREG M. CHANDRA
E
email: [email protected]
GEO/INFILTRATION:
ADDRESS:
SLADDEN ENGINEERING
HP
P/L
45090 GOLF CENTER PARKWAY
INDIO, CA 92201
0.50% HP
47' 585.53' CONTACT: BRETT ANDERSON TELEPHONE: (760)863-0713 email: [email protected]
TC 362.65
FL 361.98
0.5% 0.5%
SOURCE OF TOPOGRAPHY: INLAND AERIAL SURVEYS, INC.
ADDRESS: 7117 ARLINGTON AVENUE, SUITE "A"
RIVERSIDE, CA 92503 E
FL 360.2
FL 359.2 HP BLDG. #10 BLDG. #11
FF=361.17
DATE OF TOPOGRAPHY: JULY 11, 2023 TELEPHONE: (951) 687-4252 TG 358.75 FF=361.17 RETENTION
PE=360.5 PE=360.5 BASIN
BOT=
350.0
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: 670-110-043
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT SCHEDULE: SCHEDULE "A"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
TC 361.00
FL 360.50
TC 360.99 TC 361.05
TP 360.55
TC 361.05
TP 360.55 TC 361.06
TP 360.48 TP 360.56 5'
FS 360.67
A TC 360.26
FL 359.76
TC 360.96
TP 360.46
TC 360.81 TC 361.38 A
FL 360.88
TC 360.10
FL 359.60
TC 359.90
FL 359.40
TC 359.82
FL 359.32 FL 360.31
9' 9' TC 360.14
TP 359.64 9'
5' TC 359.93
TP 359.43 F3F5=9.17
PE=
TG 360.50 9' 9'
INV. 358.18
TG 360.50 358.67 EXISTING ZONING:
PROPOSED ZONING:
PCC (PLANNED COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL)
R3 (MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL)
INV. 358.41
CB#1 TG 359.53 TC 360.09
FL 359.59 INV. 355.75
TG 360.50 TC 360.76
FL 360.26
TC 360.59
FL 360.09
TC 359.95
FL 359.45
FL 359.20 TC 360.83
TC 359.70 HP TC 360.84
TP 360.34 TP 360.33
INV. 358.68
B B
FS 360.67 TC 358.98
FL 358.48
INV 354.00
CB2
EXISTING GENERAL PLAN LAND USE:
PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN LAND USE:
CG (GENERAL COMMERCIAL)
RMH (MEDIUM HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL)
TG 360.50
INV. 358.95
TC 361.85
TP 361.35 BLDG. #12 TC 359.75
TP 359.25 TC 360.74
TP 360.24
BLDG. #9 AREAS:
FF=361.17
PE=360.5 FF=361.67 5'
ACREAGE: OWNER / MAINTENANCE ENTITY:
PE=361.0 TC 362.11
TP 361.61
EXISTING GROSS ACREAGE:
PROPOSED NET ACREAGE:
10.48 ACRES
10.48 ACRES TC 360.07
TP 359.57 PRIVATE TG 360.50
INV. 359.25
FL 360.8
HP
FL 361.0 TC 361.23
2% FL 360.8 TP 360.73
TC 359.76
FL 359.26
TC 359.89HP
BLDGS, CLUBHOUSE, POOL, MAINT, (145668 SF)
ASPHALT (90415 SF) PAVERS (4650 SF)
3.34 ACRES
2.18 ACRES
1.59 ACRES
2.26 ACRES
1.04 ACRES
PRIVATE
PRIVATE
PRIVATE
PRIVATE
PRIVATE
TC 361.17
FL 360.67 TC 361.14
FL 360.7 FL 360.64
FL 360.5
FL 360.0
HP
TC 360.85
TP 360.35
FL 359.39 CONCRETE (54740 SF) GUTTERS (14689 SF)
LANDSCAPE (98387 SF) 5'
FF TC 359.73
TG 359.53 FL 359.23
INV. 355.75 TC 360.90
TP 360.40
TC 361.59 RETENTION BASIN (47960 SF)
FL 361.09
TC 361.40
FL 360.90
TC 361.30
TP 360.80 EXISTING EASEMENT NOTES: AN EASEMENT FOR STREET PURPOSES IN FAVOR OF THE 1 2
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO AS RECORDED IN BOOK 2825
AT PAGE 265, DATED 1/1/61, REC. OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CA. 73' 63'
47'
40'
TC 361.65 HP
FL 361.15
TC 360.90
TP 360.40
TC 359.52
FL 359.02
BLDG. #7 AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC HIGHWAY AND PUBLIC UTILITY
PURPOSED IN FAVOR OF THE CITY OF CATHEDRAL CITY AS
, DATED 6/6/91, REC. OF 11' 16'
8'
2% TC 361.55
FL 361.05
BLDG. #7 TC 361.12
FL 360.62 FF=361.20
PE=360.53
TC 360.90
TP 360.40 RECORDED PER INST. NO. 188899
7' 7' 1.30% FF=361.67 RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CA.
S/W
1 2 TC 361.56
FL 361.06
TC 360.90
TP 360.40
GB TC 360.90 TCP 3 5690.943
TG 360.10
INV. 358.85 TC 358.89 UTILITY PURVEYORS: CB3
TC 360.90
TP 360.40
FL 358.39 WATER
SEWER
- COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT
COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
PH: 760-398-2651
PH: 760-398-2651
PH: 760-202-4252
TP 360.40 -
ELECTRIC -
FL 359.44
GB
GAS
TELEPHONE
CABLE
- SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY PH: 800-427-2200
BLDG. #8 TC 360.75
FL 360.25 - FRONTIER
SPECTRUM
PH: 760-864-1726
PH: 760-346-3714 0.50% -
FF=361.67
PE=361.0
5' TC 361.23
FL 360.73
RET.
TG 359.53
INV. 357.75
BASIN
BOT=
LIQUEFACTION: NO LIQUEFACTION AREA
1.10% TC 360.90 354.0 TC 360.50 TP 360.40 TC 360.90 TP 360.00 TC 359.20
1.50% 1.50% TC 361.66 FL 358.70
TC 360.90BLDG
T
.
P
#
36 5
0.40 FEMA FLOOD ZONE DESIGNATION: ZPOERNEFIRXM(FMLO
A
OPDNHOA
.
Z0A60R6D5 CIS1U
5 N7D9GETE/RDMAITNEEDD:,ABUUGT UPOSTS2S8IB,L2E0)08
TP 361.16 TP 360.40
2% 19' FF=361.20 TC 360.90
TP 360.40 1.50%
17'
19'
TG 360.05 PE=360.53
INV. 357.47
TC 361.50
TP 361.00
17' 25' TC 360.98 TC 360.98 NOTE: 1. THIS MAP INCLUDES THE ENTIRE CONTIGUOUS OWNERSHIP OF THE LAND DIVIDER.
2. THERE ARE NO KNOWN WELLS ON PROPERTY OR WITHIN 200 FEET OF PROPERTY.
3. THERE ARE NO EXISTING DWELLINGS, BUILDINGS, OR OTHER STRUCTURES KNOWN ON THIS PROPERTY.
17'
19'
FF=361.50
PE=360.83
2% TP 360.48 TC
3 T6P0.39680.48
TC 360.57
19' TF CL 336601.0278
TP 360.78
1.50%
TC 361.13
FL 360.63
TC 360.98
TP 360.48
TP 360.48 2% TC 359.44
FL 358.94 4. SUBDIVISION WILL SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH CITY/COUNTY WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT A SEPARATE WQMP REPORT.
TC 361.55 TC 361.42
TP 361.05 TP 360.92
TC 361.43
PER
TP 360.93 1.50% 1.50%
TC 361.31 5'
TP 360.81
2.70% FF=
359.60
FS 359.35 PE=
359.10
REVISIONS: NO. DATE: DESCRIPTION:
2%
TC 361.25
TP 360.75
TC 360.53
FL 360.03
TC 361.30
TP 360.80
TC 360.94
TC 360.86 TC 361.28
TP 360.36 TP 360.78
TC 361.14 EXIST.
TC 361.53 TC 360.96
FL 361.03 FL 360.46
TC 360.92 EXIST.
WESTERLY R/W
74' EASTERLY R/W
FL 359.75 TP 360.64 TP 360.420.50%
TP 360.44 1.50% 11' 63' 0.50% FL 360.13 FL 359.86 1.50% PROP. 6' BLOCK
WALL
20' 43'
EXISTING
47'
43'
IMPROVEMENTS
TC 361.35
TP 360.85
CB4 FL 359.70
TC 360.20
TC 360.90
TP 360.40 TC 360.10
FL 359.60
TC 360.36 8' 5' 7' C/L 20' TC 360.92 TC 360.38
HP FL 359.88
TC 361.10
PROPOSED TG 360.40
INV. 357.95
FL 360.42 2% TC 360.33
FL 359.83
TC 360.78
FL 360.28
TC 360.75
EXIST. 5'
SIDEWALK
IMPROVEMENTS
8' TC 361.35 2% TP 360.60 TC 359.80 TC 361.10 4' 8' TP 360.85 TC 361.35
2% TC 360.56
FL 360.06
HPTC 361.10
2% TP 360.60 TC 361.10 TC 361.10 FL 359.30
TP 360.60 TP 36T0C.63061.10
2% PROPOSED 8'
SIDEWALK
TC 361.35
TP 360.85
TC 361.35
FL 360.
25 TG 360.40 BLDG. #3
TP 360.85 EXIST. 8"
CURB & INV. 358.27 TC 361.35 FL 360.60 2% TC 360.74
FL 360.24
TC 361.30
FL 360.80
TC 361.10
FL 360.60
GUTTER
2%
BLDG
T
.
P 3
#
60 1
.85 TP 36
B
0.8 L
5 DG. #2
TP 361.21
HP FF=361.27 B
TP
L
36 DG. #4
0.60 FF=361.47 FF=361.47 PE=360.6 FF=361.27
PE=360.6
RET.
BASIN P/L
PE=360.8 PE=360.8 2% 2% BOT=
TC 361.35
TP 360.85
TC 361.35
TP 360.85
TC 361.27
FL 360.77
TC 361.10
TP 360.60
TC 361.10
TP 360.60
350.0
SECTION "B-B"
DATE PALM DRIVE
TG 360.40
INV. 358.67
TC 361.35
TP 360.85
TC 361.35
TP 360.85
TC 361.10 NTS TC 361.10
TP 360.60
TC 361.10
2% TC 360.16 TP 360.60
TC 361.35 FL 359.66 TC 361.10
TP 360.85
TC 360.22
FL 359.72
TC 359.54
FL 359.04
FS 354.90
EMERGENCY OVERFLOW
EXIST.
SOUTHERLY R/W
EXIST.
NORTHERLY R/W
TC 361.35
TP 360.8534
TCF3L6316.306.84
TP 360.86
49' TP 360.60
TC 361.61
FL 361.11
TP 360.60
2% TC 359.55
FL 359.05 TC 361.10
TP 360.60
5' 2% TG 360.40
INV. 359.15
TC 361.35
TP 360.85
PROP. 6'
2% BLOCK 5' 25' 20' 5'
TC 361.43
FL 360.76
2% 20' 5' 24' TC 361.10
TP 360.60
C/L PROP. 5' WALL
D
SIDEWALK
C PROP. 4'
PROP. 5'
TC 361.93 TC 361.33
FL 361.43 FL 360.83
TC 361.10 RET.WALL TC 361.50 SIDEWALK
TC 361.83
FL 361.33 FL 360.60 FL 361.00 TC 361.56 0.50% 0.50% EXISTING R/W 0.50% FL 361.06 0.50% PROP. 6" PROP. 6" FL 360.62 FL 360.56
47'
CURB & GUTTER CURB & GUTTER
PROP.
STREET LIGHT
TC 356.53CB5
FL 356.03
TC 361.38
FL 360.88
PROP. 6"
CURB & GUTTER
TC 357.79
FL 357.29
PROP.
SECTION "C-C"
ROSEMOUNT AVENUE
PROP. 6'
SIDEWALK
1.89%
ROSEMOUNT AVE. STREET LIGHT (TC 352.33)
(FL 351.85)
(TC 352.24)
(FL 351.78)
C/L
TC 361.18
FL 360.68
TC 359.53 (TC 357.52) (TC 355.53)
(FL 355.04)
(1.10%)
FL 359.03 (FL 357.02
EXIST. EXIST.
SOUTHERLY R/W NORTHERLY R/W
PROP. 6'
BLOCK
WALL
EXISTING R/W
PROPOSED CROSS GUTTER D
10' 20' 20' 10'
C
C/L
PROP. INTERIOR
EXIST. 6'
SIDEWALK
SEE SHEET 2
FOR PRELIM.
STRIPING PLAN
TC 361.14
FL 360.47
EXIST. 6"
CURB & GUTTER CURB & GUTTER
PROP.
SPEED HUMP
W/FLASHING
WARNING SIGNS
EXIST. AC
PAVEMENT AHEAD AND AT THE SECTION "D-D"
ROSEMOUNT AVENUE
HUMP IN EACH DIRECTION NTS
EXIST. AC
LEGEND
BTM INDICATES BOTTOM
L.F. INDICATE LINEAR FEET
FL INDICATES FLOWLINE
TC INDICATES TOP OF CURB
TP INDICATES TOP OF PAVEMENT
VISTA CHINO
EARTHWORK ESTIMATE PRIVATE ENGINEERING NOTE:
CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT IN ACCORDANCE WITH GENERALLY ACCEPTED CONSTRUCTION PRACTICES, CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR WILL BE INV. INDICATES INVERT ELEVATION ITEM CUT (CY) FILL (CY)
TG INDICATES TOP OF GRATE
EG INDICATES EXISTING GRADE
REQUIRED TO ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE PROJECT SITE
CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROJECT, INCLUDING THE SAFETY OF PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT
SHALL BE MADE TO APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL
WORKING HOURS, AND CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR FURTHER AGREES TO DEFEND
INDEMNIFY AND HOLD DESIGN PROFESSIONAL HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL
LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK RAW
SHRINKAGE (20%)
SUBSIDENCE (0.15)
16125
-3225
-2530
5015
FS INDICATES FINISHED HARD SURFACE
FG INDICATES FINISHED DIRT
P/L INDICATES PROPERTY LINE
TF INDICATES TOP OF FOOTING
30TH AVENUE
ON THIS PROJECT, EXCEPTING LIABILITY ARISING FROM THE SOLE NEGLIGENCE OF DESIGN PROFESSIONAL. OVEREXCAVATION (3.0') -5355 UNAUTHORIZED CHANGES & USES: THE ENGINEER PREPARING TW INDICATES TOP OF WALL CYPRESS RD.
THESE PLANS WILL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR, OR LIABLE FOR, UNAUTHORIZED CHANGES TO OR USES OF THESE PLANS. ALL CHANGES TO THE PLANS MUST BE IN WRITING AND MUST BE APPROVED BY THE PREPARER OF THESE PLANS.
P INDICATES PLANTER
INDICATES BLOCK WALL
INDICATES 4" DECORATIVE CONCRETE
ROSEMOUNT AVE.
TOTAL 5015 5015
0 McCALLUM WAY
BARISTO RD.
"AS BUILT" CORRECTED APPROVED
BY BY PER LANDSCAPE PLAN EXPORT
INDICATES 4" AC OVER 6" AB DISTURBED AREA:
INDICATES 6" PAVERS 455450 S.F. 10.45 ACRES = VICINITY MAP (50) 50 INDICATES EXISTING CONTOUR WIDE/OVERWEIGHT/LONG PERMIT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR EXPORT.
NTS
INDICATES PROPOSED CONTOUR
DATE
APPROVED
DATE
DATE RREEVVIISSIIOONN BENCHMARK: ELEV.
363.23
PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECT SUPERVISION OF: DESIGN BY:
K.A.C.
CITY OF CATHEDRAL CITY, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE,
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FILE NO. SHEET
DATE PALM/RAMON 5225 Canyon Crest Drive, Ste 251
116 Riverside, California 92507
23-4c7co1c3ivFila.xco: m951-405-8410 DRAWN BY:
C.A.C.
PRELIMINARY GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN
THE WREN
LOCATION: BENCHMARK: FD. CATHEDRAL CITY 1
BRONZE DISC. IN CONCRETE MONUMENT AT THE
h@
KEITH A. CHRISTIANSEN
DATE
R.C.E. 50083 APN 670-110-043
XXXXX ROSEMOUNT AVENUE
DWG. NO. NE COR. OF DATE PALM DR. & RAMON RD. APPROX. Christiansen & Company CHECKED BY:
K.A.C.
OF2 SHEETS 20 FEET FROM EDGES OF PAVEMENT. Land Development - Design - Engineering Est. 2007
IN THE CITY OF CATHEDRAL CITY, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
PRELIMINARY GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN
THE WREN
EXHIBIT DATE: MARCH 4, 2024
PRELIMINARY GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN DATA TABLE
APPLICANT:
ADDRESS:
COACHELLA VALLEY COMMUNITY DEELOPMENT GROUP, INC
THE WREN
36101 BOB HOPE DRIVE, SUITE E5
RANCHO MIRAGE, CA 92270
CONTACT: STEFAN VOGEL TELEPHONE: (626) 277-6782
email: [email protected]
APN 670-110-043
XXXXX ROSEMOUNT AVENUE
LAND OWNER:
ADDRESS:
DESERT CARE, LLC
31190 CALLE CAYUGA
CATHEDRAL CITY, CA 92234
CONTACT: STEFAN VOGEL TELEPHONE: (626) 277-6782
email: [email protected]
EXHIBIT PREPARER:
ADDRESS:
CHRISTIANSEN & COMPANY
5225 CANYON CREST DRIVE, SUITE 251
RIVERSIDE, CA 92507
C/L CONTACT: KEITH CHRISTIANSEN TELEPHONE: (951)323-4713 TELEPHONE: (949)955-4500
TELEPHONE: (760)610-9873
TELEPHONE: (760)360-0665
email: [email protected]
ARCHITECT:
ADDRESS:
HUMPHREYS & PARTNERS ARCHITECTS, LP
2350 BRISTOL STREET
COSTA MESA, CA 92626
CONTACT: VELY ZAJEC
email: [email protected]
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: JSA LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
ADDRESS: 19846 COVENTRY LANE
HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 26'
CONTACT: JIM SHROPE
5' 13' 13' 5' email: [email protected]
PROP. 6"
TYPE "D" CURB
PROP. 4" AC
PROP. 6" OVER 6" AB 2:1 max.
GEOTECHNICAL:
ADDRESS:
LANDMARK CONSULTANTS, INC.
CURB & GUTTER (CRUSHED MISC.) 77-948 WILDCAT DRIVE
PALM DESERT, CA 92211 2:1 max.
CONTACT: GREG M. CHANDRA
P/L email: [email protected]
COMPACTED SUBGRADE
PROPOSED NORTHGATE
ACCESS ROAD
GEO/INFILTRATION:
ADDRESS: 45090 GOLF CENTER PARKWAY
INDIO, CA 92201
SLADDEN ENGINEERING
N.T.S.
CONTACT: BRETT ANDERSON TELEPHONE: (760)863-0713
email: [email protected]
SOURCE OF TOPOGRAPHY: INLAND AERIAL SURVEYS, INC.
ADDRESS: 7117 ARLINGTON AVENUE, SUITE "A"
EXIST. RIVERSIDE, CA 92503
DATE OF TOPOGRAPHY: JULY 11, 2023 TELEPHONE: (951) 687-4252 HP
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: 670-110-043
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT SCHEDULE: SCHEDULE "A"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
PROPOSED 26' WIDE
4" AC OVER 6" AB
ACCESS ROAD
73'
63'
47'
13'
11' 16'
29.85'
EXISTING ZONING:
PROPOSED ZONING:
PCC (PLANNED COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL)
R3 (MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) EXISTING PARKING
EXISTING PARKING
73'
63'
LP SWALE EXISTING GENERAL PLAN LAND USE:
PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN LAND USE:
CG (GENERAL COMMERCIAL)
RMH (MEDIUM HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL)
11' 47' 16' D=89°58'12" R=50.00
L=78.51 T=49.97 AREAS:
ACREAGE: OWNER / MAINTENANCE ENTITY:
HP N89° 59' 44"W 247.80 P/L EXISTING GROSS ACREAGE:
PROPOSED NET ACREAGE:
10.48 ACRES
10.48 ACRES
AC HP 0.50% PRIVATE
47'
TC 362.65
FL 361.98
0.5% 0.5%
5'
BLDGS, CLUBHOUSE, POOL, MAINT, (145668 SF)
ASPHALT (90415 SF) PAVERS (4650 SF)
3.34 ACRES
2.18 ACRES
1.59 ACRES
2.26 ACRES
1.04 ACRES
PRIVATE
PRIVATE
PRIVATE
PRIVATE
PRIVATE
CONCRETE (54740 SF) GUTTERS (14689 SF)
LANDSCAPE (98387 SF) E
FL 360.2
FL 359.2 HP
TG 358.75
BLDG. #10 BLDG. #11 RETENTION BASIN (47960 SF)
NORTHGATE ACCESS ROAD SCALE: 1"=40'
EGEND
T
L
NDICATE B TT
NDI ATE LINEAR FEET
NDICATE FL WLINE
NDICATE F C RB
NDICATE F P
NDICATE INVERT ELEVATI
NDICATE F GRATE
C T P
T P
T P
NDICATE FINI HED HARD RFAC
P/L NDICATE PR PERTY LINE
NDICATE F WALL T P
NDICATE PLANTER
NDICATE BL CK WALL
NDICATE DEC RATIVE C NCRETE
4 PER LANDSCAPE PLAN
"AS BUILT"
RREEVVIISSIIOONN
CORRECTED APPROVED INDICATES 4" AC OVER 6" AB
BY BY
INDICATES 6" PAVERS
(50)
50 INDICATES EXISTING CONTOUR
INDICATES PROPOSED CONTOUR
DATE
APPROVED
DATE
DATE BENCHMARK:
DATE PALM/RAMON
116
ELEV. PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECT SUPERVISION OF: DESIGN BY:
K.A.C.
DRAWN BY:
C.A.C.
CHECKED BY:
K.A.C.
CITY OF CATHEDRAL CITY, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE,
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FILE NO. SHEET
363.23 5225 Canyon Crest Drive, Ste 251
PRELIMINARY GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN RPhiv:e
9 r5s1id-3e,2C3-a
4 l7if1o3rnFiaax9:2
951
50 7-405-8410
LOCATION: BENCHMARK: FD. CATHEDRAL CITY email:[email protected] THE WREN 2
APN 670-110-043
XXXXX ROSEMOUNT AVENUE
BRONZE DISC. IN CONCRETE MONUMENT AT THE KEITH A. CHRISTIANSEN DATE
R.C.E. 50083 DWG. NO. NE COR. OF DATE PALM DR. & RAMON RD. APPROX. Christiansen & Company Land Development - Design - Engineering
Est. 2007
OF2 SHEETS 20 FEET FROM EDGES OF PAVEMENT.
CHAIR
Steve Manos
Lake Elsinore
VICE CHAIR
Russell Betts
Desert Hot Springs
COMMISSIONERS
John Lyon
Riverside
Steven Stewart
Palm Springs
Richard Stewart
Moreno Valley
Michael Geller
Riverside
Vernon Poole
Murrieta
STAFF
Director
Paul Rull
Simon A. Housman
Jackie Vega
Barbara Santos
County Administrative Center
4080 Lemon St.,14th Floor.
Riverside, CA 92501
(951) 955-5132
www.rcaluc.org
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
AIRPORT LAND USE COMMISSION
September 12, 2024
Cynthia Schultz, Project Planner
Cathedral City, Planning Department
68700 Avenida Lalo Guerrero,
Cathedral City, CA 92234
RE: AIRPORT LAND USE COMMISSION (ALUC) DEVELOPMENT REVIEW File No.: ZAP1107PS24
Related File Nos.: GPA23-001 (General Plan Amendment), CZ23-001 (Change of Zone), DR23-002 (Design Review)
Compatibility Zones: Zone E
APNs: 670-110-043
Dear Ms. Schultz:
On September 12, 2024, the Riverside County Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) found Cathedral City Case Nos. GPA23-001 (General Plan Amendment), CZ23-001 (Change of Zone), DR23-002 (Design Review), a proposal to construct a 204 unit apartment complex on 10.48 acres, located southerly of 30th Avenue and easterly of Date Palm Drive. The applicant also proposes to amend the site’s general plan land use designation from General Commercial to Medium High Density, and change its zoning from PCC (Planned Community Commercial) to R3 (Med-High Density Residential, CONSISTENT with the 2005 Palm Springs International Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan, subject to the conditions listed below:
CONDITIONS:
1. Any outdoor lighting installed shall be hooded or shielded to prevent either the spillage of lumens or reflection into the sky. Outdoor lighting shall be downward facing.
2. The following uses are prohibited:
(a) Any use which would direct a steady light or flashing light of red, white, green, or amber colors associated with airport operations toward an aircraft engaged in an initial straight climb following takeoff or toward an aircraft engaged in a straight final approach toward a landing at an airport, other than an FAA-approved navigational signal light or visual approach slope indicator. (b) Any use which would cause sunlight to be reflected towards an aircraft engaged in an initial straight climb following takeoff or towards an aircraft engaged in a straight final approach towards a landing at an airport. (c) Any use which would generate smoke or water vapor or which would attract large concentrations of birds, or which may otherwise affect safe air navigation within the area. (Such uses include landscaping utilizing water features, aquaculture, outdoor production of cereal grains, sunflower, and row crops, composting operations, wastewater management facilities, artificial marshes, trash transfer stations that are open on one or more sides, recycling centers containing putrescible wastes, construction and demolition debris facilities, fly 2 ash disposal, and incinerators.)
(d) Any use which would generate electrical interference that may be detrimental to the operation of aircraft and/or aircraft instrumentation. (e) Any use which results in a hazard to flight, including physical (e.g., tall objects), visual, and electronic forms of interference with the safety of aircraft operations.
3. The attached “Notice of Airport in Vicinity” shall be provided to all prospective purchasers and occupants of the property.
4. Any proposed stormwater basins or facilities shall be designed and maintained to provide for a maximum 48-hour detention period following the design storm, and remain totally dry between rainfalls. Vegetation in and around the basins that would provide food or cover for birds would be incompatible with airport operations and shall not be utilized in project landscaping. Trees shall be spaced so as to prevent large expanses of contiguous canopy, when mature. Landscaping in and around the basin(s) shall not include trees or shrubs that produce seeds, fruits, or berries.
Landscaping in the stormwater basin, if not rip-rap, should be in accordance with the guidance provided in ALUC “LANDSCAPING NEAR AIRPORTS” brochure, and the “AIRPORTS, WILDLIFE AND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT” brochure available at RCALUC.ORG which list acceptable plants from Riverside County Landscaping Guide or other alternative landscaping as may be recommended by a qualified wildlife hazard biologist.
A notice sign, in a form similar to that attached hereto, shall be permanently affixed to the stormwater basin with the following language: “There is an airport nearby. This stormwater basin is designed to hold stormwater for only 48 hours and not attract birds.
Proper maintenance is necessary to avoid bird strikes”. The sign will also include the name, telephone number or other contact information of the person or entity responsible to monitor the stormwater basin.
Supporting documentation was provided to the Airport Land Use Commission and is available online at www.rcaluc.org, click Agendas 9-12-24 Agenda, Bookmark Agenda Item No. 3.1.
If you have any questions, please contact me at (951) 955-6893.
Sincerely,
RIVERSIDE COUNTY AIRPORT LAND USE COMMISSION
______________________________________
Paul Rull, ALUC Director
Attachments: Notice of Airport in Vicinity
cc: S2 Builders (applicant) (property owner)
Stefan Vogel (representative)
Harry Barrett, Airport Manager, Palm Springs International Airport ALUC Case File
X:\AIRPORT CASE FILES\Palm Springs\ZAP1107PS24\ZAP1107PS24.LTR.doc
NOTICE OF AIRPORT IN
VICINITY
This property is presently located in the vicinity of an airport, within what is known as an airport influence
area. For that reason, the property may be subject to
some of the annoyances or inconveniences associated
with proximity to airport operations (for example: noise, vibration, or odors). Individual sensitivities to those annoyances [can vary from person to person. You may
wish to consider what airport annoyances], if any, are
associated with the property before you complete your
purchase and determine whether they are acceptable to
you. Business & Professions Code Section 11010 (b)
(13)(A)
THERE IS AN AIRPORT NEARBY.
THIS STORM WATER BASIN IS DESIGNED TO HOLD
STORM WATER FOR ONLY 48 HOURS AND
NOT TO ATTRACT BIRDS
PROPER MAINTENANCE IS NECESSARY TO AVOID
BIRD STRIKES
N O T I C E
IF THIS BASIN IS OVERGROWN, PLEASE CONTACT:
Name: _____________________ Phone: ____________________ 1 October 2024
CITY OF CATHEDRAL CITY
68-700 Avenida Lalo Guerrero
Cathedral City, California 92234
Phone: (760) 770-0340
DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL INITIAL STUDY
Project Title: The Wren Multiple-Family Development Project Project No: Change of Zone 23-001
General Plan Amendment 23-001
Design Review 23-002
Lead Agency
Name and Address: City of Cathedral City
68-700 Avenida Lalo Guerrero
Cathedral City, CA 92234
(760) 770-0340
Applicant: S2 Builders
36101 Bob Hope Dr., Ste. E5189
Rancho Mirage, CA 92270
(760) 895-0440
Contact Name: Stefan Vogel
Contact Person: Sandra Molina, Deputy Director of Community and Economic Development
(760) 202-2433
[email protected]
Project Location: The geographic area covered by the proposed Project includes approximately 10.48 gross acres also identified as Assessor’s Parcel Number 670-110-043. The Project is located on the northeast corner of Date Palm Drive and the future west extension of Rosemount Road, generally located on the east side of Date Palm Drive, south of 30th Avenue and north of McCallum Way in Cathedral City, California in the County of Riverside.
Existing General Plan Designation: General Commercial (CG) Proposed General Plan Designation: RM (Medium Density Residential) Existing Zoning Designation: Planned Community Commercial (PCC) Proposed Zoning Designation: Multiple-Family Residential The Wren Multiple-Family Development Project Initial Study 2 October 2024
Table of Contents
I. AESTHETICS............................................................................................................................... 18 II. AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY RESOURCES................................................................... 23 III. AIR QUALITY............................................................................................................................. 25 IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES...................................................................................................... 36 V. CULTURAL RESOURCES......................................................................................................... 41 VI. ENERGY ...................................................................................................................................... 44 VII. GEOLOGY AND SOILS ............................................................................................................. 48 VIII. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS............................................................................................. 52 IX. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ........................................................................ 58 X. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY.................................................................................. 62 XI. LAND USE AND PLANNING.................................................................................................... 70 XII. MINERAL RESOURCES ............................................................................................................ 74 XIII. NOISE........................................................................................................................................... 75 XIV. POPULATION AND HOUSING................................................................................................. 80 XV. PUBLIC SERVICES .................................................................................................................... 82 XVI. RECREATION ............................................................................................................................. 85 XVII. TRANSPORTATION................................................................................................................... 87 XVIII. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES.......................................................................................... 94 XIX. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS ..................................................................................... 96 XX. WILDFIRE ................................................................................................................................. 101 XXI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE.................................................................... 103 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM........................................................ 106 TABLES
Table 1: Regional Significance – Unmitigated and Mitigated Construction Emissions (pounds/day). 31 Table 2: Regional Significance - Unmitigated Operational Emissions (lbs/day) ................................. 32 Table 3: Localized Significance – Construction ................................................................................... 33 Table 4: Localized Significance – Unmitigated Operational Emissions .............................................. 34 Table 5: Opening Year Unmitigated Project-Related Greenhouse Gas Emissions .............................. 53 Table 6: Project Consistency with Connect SoCal 2024 Goals............................................................ 54 Table 7: City of Cathedral City CAP Applicable Measures Project Consistency ................................ 56 Table 8: Residential Land Use Goals, Policies and Programs.............................................................. 72 Table 9: Worst-case Predicted Operational Noise Level ...................................................................... 77 Table 10: Change in Existing Noise Levels as a Result of the Project................................................... 78 Table 11: Project Student Generation Rate............................................................................................. 84
EXHIBITS
Exhibit 1: Regional Map.......................................................................................................................... 13 Exhibit 2: Local Vicinity Map................................................................................................................. 14 Exhibit 3: Existing and Proposed Land Use ............................................................................................ 15 Exhibit 4: Site Plan .................................................................................................................................. 16 Exhibit 5: Landscape Plan ....................................................................................................................... 17 The Wren Multiple-Family Development Project Initial Study 3 October 2024
APPENDICES (Available at City for review)
Appendix A Date Palm Apartments Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Study, prepared by MD Acoustics, August 30, 2024
Appendix B Biological Resources Assessment, Jurisdictional Delineation and CVMSHP Consistency Analysis for the Date Palm Apartment Complex, City of Cathedral City, prepared by Jennings Environmental, August 2023
Appendix C Historical/Archaeological Resources Survey Report, Assessor’s Parcel Nos. 670-110-043, -045, -048 to -053, -055, and -056, prepared by CRM Tech, October 24, 2023 Appendix D-1 Geotechnical Report for Living Care Assisted Living, APN 670-110-043, prepared by LandMark Consultants, June 15, 2023
Appendix D-2 Paleontological Resources Assessment Report, Assessor’s Parcel Nos. 670-110-043, -045, -048 to -053, -055, and -056, prepared by CRM Tech, October 24, 2023 Appendix E-1 Preliminary Hydrology Study, for The Wren, APN 670-110-043, prepared by Christiansen & Company, October 2023
Appendix E-2 Project Specific Water Quality Management Plan, prepared by Christiansen & Company, October 11, 2023
Appendix F Date Palm Apartments Noise Impact Study, prepared by MD Acoustic, October 17, 2023 Appendix G-1 The Wren Project Transportation Analysis, prepared by Integrated Engineering Group, July 2024
Appendix G-2 Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Analysis, The Wren Residential Development, Cathedral City, CA, prepared by General Technologies and Solutions, June 3, 2024 Appendix H Project Plans
The Wren Multiple-Family Development Project Initial Study 4 October 2024
Purpose of the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration:
The City has prepared an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) for “The Wren MultipleFamily Development Project,” (Project) proposed to be a 204-apartment home complex situated on an approximately 11-acre parcel on the east side of Date Palm Drive, generally located between 30th Avenue and McCallum Way (Project Site).
The Project Site was included in a 2007 IS/MND for the “Uptown Village Specific Plan Amendment” (2007 IS/MND) which assessed the environmental impacts of changing the zoning of the Project Site and the adjacent southern approximately 9-acre parcel from R-1 (Single-Family Residential) to PCC (Planned Community Commercial). The 2007 IS/MND also identified that Rosemont Road, which dead ends in a residential neighborhood to the east, would be constructed and separate the Project Site from a 9-acre parcel directly to the south of the Project Site. The 2007 IS/MND identified that the Project Site would be developed with a combination of retail, including drive-through restaurants, and residential condominiums, while the southern 9-acre parcel would be developed with a combination of restaurant and retail uses. The 2007 IS/MND included the Project Site’s conceptual commercial development for CEQA purposes. However, the City approvals for the Project Site included only the General Plan Amendment and Zone Change and excluded approving the concept plans for the Project Site, in accordance with the Uptown Village applicant’s direction. Therefore, for the currently proposed Project the City determined that a new Initial Study was required to address the potential impacts of converting a vacant parcel, with a commercial land use and zoning, into a multi-family residential development. Uses allowed by City code in the PCC zone include retail, office, and hotels. The entire project identified in the Uptown Village Specific Plan Amendment was never constructed, and both Project Site and the southern 9-acre parcel have remained vacant.
The proposed Project is subject to the approval of the following entitlements:
• General Plan Amendment No. 23-001: To amend the General Plan Land Use designation from GC (General Commercial) to RMH (Medium High Density Residential). • Change of Zone No. 23-001: To amend the zoning designation from PCC (Planned Community Commercial) to R3 (Multiple-Family Residential).
• Design Review 23-002: To develop a 204-apartment home complex within 12 buildings in accordance with the City’s height limitations, a 6,000 square foot clubhouse with a swimming pool, and public road improvements.
The Project Site was identified in the 2007 IS/MND as 11 acres. Since that time, 0.52 acre was dedicated to public right-of-way for the development of Rosemount Road; therefore, the current parcel size is 10.48 acres, all of which is proposed for the Project development.
The Project, for which this IS/MND has been prepared, will result in a 204-apartment home complex in 12 separate buildings, common areas, and retention areas on the approximately 11-acre parcel. The Project will also construct full width improvements on Rosemount Road from the single-family residential subdivision on the east, to Date Palm Road on the west. The main entrance to the complex would be from Rosemount Road. A secondary access is planned at the complex’s northeastern property boundary which will connect to an on-site drive to be constructed by the Project on Assessor Parcel No. (APN) 670-110- 042 that would follow disturbed access roads around an existing retention basin, creating access to 30th Avenue on the north and Date Palm to the west. This off-site improvement will require an easement on that adjacent property, which will be secured and recorded on APN 670-110-042 by the Project proponent prior to development.
The Wren Multiple-Family Development Project Initial Study 5 October 2024
For purposes of this document, The Wren Multiple-Family Development Project is referred to as “the Project” or “the Proposed Project.” Any reference to the 2007 Uptown Village Specific Plan Amendment, approved by the City in December 2007, will be referred to as UVSP for clarity.
This IS/MND evaluates the potential environmental impacts associated with implementation of the proposed Project. The IS/MND has been prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq. The City of Cathedral City will serve as the lead agency for this project pursuant to CEQA. The City’s General Plan, titled “City of Cathedral City 2040 General Plan and Active Transportation Plan, adopted 2021, prepared by Terra Nova, is incorporated by reference as “City’s General Plan” and can be viewed at:
https://www.cathedralcity.gov/departments/planning/documents/general-plan Determination:
On the basis of this IS/MND and the special studies attached in the Appendices and an evaluation of the City of Cathedral City’s General Plan and the Environmental Impact Report prepared for the City’s General Plan (SCH#2018081012), it has been determined that the Project will not have a significant impact on the environment, and a Mitigated Negative Declaration is proposed for adoption.
Project Location:
The proposed Project is located in the City of Cathedral City, Riverside County, California as shown in Exhibit 1: Regional Map. The geographic area covered by the Project Site includes 10.48 acres identified as Assessor Parcel Number 670-110-043.
The proposed Project is located approximately 1.62 miles south of Interstate 10 (I-10), 2.5 miles east of the Palm Springs International Airport, 2 miles east of City of Palm Springs and approximately 1 mile west of the City of Rancho Mirage.
The Project Site is generally located south of 30th Avenue, north of McCallum Way, east of Date Palm Drive and west of Alexander Drive. Specifically, the Project Site is located on the northeast corner of Date Palm Drive and the planned extension of Rosemount Road as shown in Exhibit 2:
Local Vicinity Map.
Currently, the Project Site is undeveloped. Surrounding land uses include Date Palm Drive on the west, single-family residential on the east, Northgate Community Church on the north, and the future extension of Rosemount Road on the south.
General Plan and Zoning:
The Project Site has a land use designation of General Commercial (CG) on the City’s General Plan Land Use Map. The Project Site has a zoning designation of Planned Community Commercial (PCC) on the City’s Zoning Map. The PCC zone provides for “retail and service commercial uses which are of a relatively high intensity and are necessary to provide a wide range of shopping facilities and goods, professional and administrative offices and entertainment” (Chapter 9.30.010).
The Proposed Project consists of a 204-apartment home complex. The use is not allowed within either the CG General Plan land use designation or the PCC zone.
The Wren Multiple-Family Development Project Initial Study 6 October 2024
The Proposed Project is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Designation of RMH (Medium High Density) which allows for a range of attached housing, including apartments and condominiums with 11 to 20 dwelling units per acre.
The Proposed Project is consistent with the zoning definition for R3 (Multiple-Family Residential) which defines medium high density as ranging from 11 to 20 dwelling units per acre and high density as ranging from20 to 24 dwelling units per acre.(City Code Chapter 9.20.050). The Project provides for approximately 19.46 dwelling units per acre, which would be classified as a medium-high density development in the R-3 zone.
Therefore, the Project requires approval of a General Plan Amendment and Change of Zone to allow its development. Refer to Exhibit 3: Existing Zoning and Proposed Land Use.
Project Description:
The Applicant proposes to construct a 204-unit apartment complex with a 6,000 square foot (SF) clubhouse, swimming pool and other amenities, on 10.48 acres. The Project also includes the completion of public road improvements to extend Rosemount Road to Date Palm Drive and the extension of off-site driveways through the existing church to the north. The main entrance to the complex would be from Rosemount Road. A secondary access is planned at the complex’s northeastern property boundary that would follow existing disturbed access roads around an existing retention basin, providing access to 30th Avenue to the north and Date Palm to the west.
Project development generally includes a 12-bulding complex containing 204 apartment homes that offer a variety of one- to three-bedroom floorplans, along with internal roadways, covered and open parking, sidewalks, landscaping and a storm water retention basin. The site also includes a centrally-located common recreation area with a pool, spa, BBQs, a “kiddy fountain”/splash pad and a 6,000 square foot (SF) clubhouse that contains a fitness center, game room with kitchen, a conference room, a common mailroom, and leasing office. The Project Site would be fully enclosed by a 6-foot-high block wall with gated ingress/egress on the north and south boundaries. Appendix H: Project Plans provides detailed plans of the Project and Exhibit 4: Site Plan provides a layout of the Project facilities.
General On-Site Development: Project Site grading is designed to balance, therefore, there would be no import or export of soil. The site would be graded to drain through the interior curb and gutters and surface ribbon drains into a 1.04 acre stormwater retention basin to be located along the eastern property boundary, which also provides an additional buffer to the single-family residential that exists to the east. Buildings would occupy approximately 3.34 acres while asphalt and concrete would make up 3.77 acres.
Landscaping would be situated throughout the complex and would be approximately 2.33acres.
Density - The proposed 204 single-family dwelling units on 10.48 net acres would yield a density of 19.46 dwelling units per acre. This proposed density is consistent with the R3 (Multiple Family Residential) zone, and the General Plan Land Use designation of RMH (Medium High Density Residential) of 11-20 dwelling units per acre.
Dwelling Unit Size. City Code Chapter 9.20.140 – Dwelling unit size, identifies the minimum size for multi-family units as 750 square feet for one-bedroom units, 900 SF for two-bedroom units, and 1,100 SF for three-bedroom units.
The Wren Multiple-Family Development Project Initial Study 7 October 2024
The Project proposes a mix of units and floorplans that include the following: 48 one-bedroom/one bathroom that range in size from 750 to 929 SF; 132 two-bedroom/two-bathroom that range from 1,050SF to 1,139 SF; and 24 three-bedroom/two-bathroom that range from 1,280 SF to 1,400 SF. Therefore, the Project is in compliance with the City Code governing dwelling unit size.
Building Height - The maximum height of structures permitted in the R3 zoning designation is 35 feet, except where the building is within 30 feet of property zoned RE, R1 or R2, in which case the maximum height is 16 feet. (City Code Chapter 9.20.080). The Planning Commission may permit an increase in the height up to 26 feet if it is found that such increase will not adversely affect adjacent properties. The Planning Commission review of an increase above 16 feet shall be made through a design review application.
The Project proposes a mix of two-story and three-story buildings within the complex. On the east and south sides of the complex, six two-story buildings with a maximum height of approximately 28 feet are situated approximately 79 to 89 feet away from the R-1 zoning which lies on the eastern boundary (refer to Appendix H, Sheet A-02, “Type A”). These buildings are not within 30 feet of the R1 lands to the east and are therefore consistent under the provisions of Chapter 9.20.080.
Another six buildings are designed as a combination of two and three stories to add architectural relief and reduce building massing (refer to Appendix H, Sheet A-12). These combination buildings have maximum height of approximately 35 feet and would be situated primarily along the west, north and center of the complex, west of the pool (refer to Appendix H, Sheet A-02, “Type B.”). These buildings are not adjacent to R1 land, and are consistent with the City’s height requirements.
Setbacks - Chapter 9.20.070 identifies that all structures shall have a 15-foot minimum setback from public or private streets. The Project is designed with the buildings within the complex set back approximately 83 feet on the east where a block wall will separate the complex from the adjacent single-family residential, 18 feet from a proposed block wall on the west along Date Palm Drive, approximately 30 feet from a shared access road on the northern boundary, and approximately 38 feet on the south from the buildings to the curb at Rosemount Road.
The buildings within the complex are generally spaced 25 feet apart, separated by the interior roadways and parking areas. The Project Site is flat, therefore, there are no hillside or slope setback requirements.
Architectural Design – The Project is designed so that the three-story buildings are situated along the north and western boundaries to shield the complex from the strong northwest winds while creating a contemporary urban edge at Date Palm Drive. The smaller two-story buildings are primarily situated along the south and east, separated from the adjacent residential by a 6-foot-high block wall and a generous greenspace buffer that also functions as the Project’s stormwater retention.
The primary color scheme is off-white and gray stucco with blue accent panels, walnut accent siding, black metal awnings and railing, and bronze finish aluminum trim around the windows.
Parking. Parking is defined in City Code Chapter 9.20.090 as requiring 1.5 car parking spaces per unit, for a total of 306 spaces required. The Project provides a total of 319 spaces (or 1.56 per unit), of which 192 are garage stalls and 127 are surface stalls (100 stalls are covered by a solar-roof carport, and 27 stalls are open). The lower units would have direct access to the garages. Some of the garages are designed with tandem parking for two vehicles, and others are designed for single-vehicle parking surface. Therefore, the Project is compliant regarding parking per the Code.
The Wren Multiple-Family Development Project Initial Study 8 October 2024
Site Access - The Project would be served by one main point of ingress/egress and one secondary ingress/egress, both of which would be gated.
The main ingress/egress to the Project would be Rosemount Road, which would be constructed as part of the Project between from the residential subdivision to the east, to Date Palm to the west (refer to Off-Site Improvements below). The complex’s entry would be via a 24-foot-wide entry driveway and a 20-footwide exit driveway separated by a landscaped median.
The ingress driveway at Rosemount Road is designed to accommodate a three-car queuing distance between the security card reader and the Rosemount Road right-of-way so vehicles do not stack onto Rosemount Road. Additionally, a 24-foot-wide opening between the security card reader and the gate is included for guests or visitors to exit the property.
The secondary ingress/egress is proposed on the northern boundary via a 25-foot-wide all access driveway that would connect to the Northgate Church property adjacent to the northern Project Site where the Proposed Project residents can access either Date Palm Drive or 30th Avenue for ingress and egress to the Proposed Project.
Emergency vehicle access would be provided via either entrance/exit, and emergency vehicle access locks will be provided per City standard at each of the gated entrances.
On-Site Vehicular Circulation - Interior drive aisles vary between approximately 25 feet wide and 18 feet wide, and all interior roads provide two-way travel throughout the complex.
On-Site Pedestrian Circulation – ADA-compliant sidewalks will be installed inside the complex in various areas to facilitate access to the units and amenity areas. Posted speed limit signs will allow for safe pedestrian circulation.
On-Site Recreational Amenities and Open Space– City Code Chapter 9.20.120 Open Space requires R3 projects to provide usable open space at a minimum of 300 SF for each dwelling unit. This space may be provided as private outdoor living areas, balconies, decks or common recreational leisure area. Except in the case of balconies, such areas shall be landscaped and screened from the street and adjacent property.
Based on 204 dwelling units, the Project would be required to provide approximately 61,200 SF of usable open space; the Project provides approximately 93,180 SF of usable open space consistent with the City’s requirement. The open space areas are landscaped and screened from the street and adjoining property.
Landscape/Hardscape: City Code Chapter 9.20.130 – Landscaping identifies that the Project would require an approved landscaping and irrigation system to be installed, subject to the standards of Chapter 8.57, in all areas of the lot not covered by impervious materials at the time of construction of the main buildings.
City parkways shall be included in the landscaping.
The Project proposes to retain the existing 6-foot-high block wall on the east and install new, decorative masonry block walls on the north, south and western boundaries. The new block walls would be designed consistent with the architecture of the complex. Hardscape areas include accents of river rock, decomposed granite, and gray boulders that line the interior roadways and sidewalks.
The Wren Multiple-Family Development Project Initial Study 9 October 2024
The landscape concept provides a comprehensive, layered landscape palette with thematic trees, including Shoestring Acacia, Hybrid Fan Palm and Mediterranean Fan Palm that blend with the proposed architecture (Exhibit 5 – Landscape Plan). Shrubs including but not limited to Barbados Aloe, Rio Bravo Langman’s Sage, Sierra Bouquet Barometerbush, La Jolla Bougainvillea, Spreading Sunshine Lantana, Yellow Bells, Iceberg Rose, and Prostrate Natal Plum are proposed. The landscaping plan will be required to comply with City and CVWD water conservation requirements.
Stormwater Management. The natural drainage pattern of the site is from the northwest corner to the southeast corner. Post construction stormwater management for the apartment community preserves the existing overall drainage pattern. Drainage is directed as sheet flow to collect to gutters, catch basins and underground drainage pipes that would direct the flows into a 1.04 acre stormwater retention basin located along the eastern boundary, in accordance with the Project Specific Hydrology Study (Appendix E-1). The stormwater system has been designed to retain 100 percent of the 100-year, 3-hour storm event within the property boundary per the City of Cathedral City stormwater ordinance.
Off-Site Improvements. The off-site improvements in the public right of way include the completion of Rosemount Road from its eastern terminus in the single-family residential subdivision to Date Palm Drive as a two-lane roadway with two, 20-foot drive lanes, and curb and gutter and sidewalks on both sides, designed to City standards. Additional off-site improvements include extending main water, sewer and natural gas in the Rosemount Road right-of-way along with main laterals to feed the complex. Electricity to the site is also expected to be provided through underground conduits within the Rosemount Road rightof-way.
The secondary ingress/egress would be constructed on private property within the Northgate Church property (APN 670-110-042) as new interior drive aisles on the church property that would connect to other existing interior drive aisles that lead to existing driveways. These drive aisles would be constructed by the Proposed Project, and be completed prior to Project occupancy, along the existing dirt access roads around an existing retention basin that serves the church grounds (refer to Figure 2). One of the new drive aisles would connect to the church’s existing interior drive aisle and driveway at 30th Avenue to the north, and the second would connect to an existing interior drive aisle with the driveway that connects to Date Palm Drive. Once the new drive aisles are constructed, they will become part of the church’s interior drive aisle systems.
Utilities and Service Providers. The following agencies and companies will provide service to the Project Site:
1. Sanitary Sewer: Coachella Valley Water District
2. Water: Coachella Valley Water District
3. Electricity: Southern California Edison (SCE)
4. Gas: Southern California Gas Company
5. Telephone: Frontier
6. Storm Drain: City of Cathedral City
7. Waste and Recycling: Burrtec
8. Cable: Spectrum
Environmental Setting and Surrounding Land Uses
The Project Site is currently undeveloped. The subject site sits on generally flat terrain that gently slopes to the southeast. Land uses nearby and adjacent to the site include:
The Wren Multiple-Family Development Project Initial Study 10 October 2024
Existing Condition General Plan Land Use
Designation Zoning Designation
Project Site Vacant
Existing: General Commercial
Proposed: Medum High
Density
Existing: Planned Community
Commercial
Proposed: Multiple-Family
Residential
North
Northgate Community Church and
existing drive aisle network that
provides access to Date Palm Drive
to the west and to 30th Avenue to
the north of church
RL-Low Density Residential
(2-4.5 du/ac) R-1 (Single Family Residential)
South
Rosemount Road (unimproved);
vacant lands south of Rosemount
Road
GC – General Commercial PCC (Planned Community
Commercial)
West Date Palm Drive; vacant lands west
of Date Palm Drive
Date Palm Drive; CNNeighborhood Commercial
west of Date Palm Drive
PCC (Planned Community
Commercial)
East Single-family homes RL-Low Density Residential
(2-4.5 du/ac) R-1 (Single Family Residential)
Other public agencies whose approval is or may be required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement.)
• Riverside County Health Department.
• Regional Water Quality Control Board.
• Coachella Valley Water District.
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED:
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this Project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages.
Aesthetics Agriculture and
Forestry Resources Air Quality
Biological Resources Cultural Resources Energy
Geology /Soils Greenhouse Gas
Emissions
Hazards & Hazardous
Materials
Hydrology / Water
Quality Land Use / Planning Mineral Resources
Noise Population / Housing Public Services
Recreation Transportation Tribal Cultural Resources
Utilities/Service
Systems Wildfire Mandatory Findings of Significance
The Wren Multiple-Family Development Project Initial Study 12 October 2024
EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS:
1) A brief explanation is required for all answers except “No Impact” answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A “No Impact” answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to Projects like the one involved (e.g., the Project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A “No Impact” answer should be explained where it is based on Project-specific factors as well as general standards (e.g., the Project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a Project-specific screening analysis). 2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off-site as well as on-site, cumulative as well as Project-level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts.
3) Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant with mitigation, or less than significant. “Potentially Significant Impact” is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect may be significant. If there are one or more “Potentially Significant Impact” entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. 4) “Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated” applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from “Potentially Significant Impact” to a “Less Than Significant Impact.” The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from “Earlier Analyses,” as described in (5) below, may be cross-referenced). 5) Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following:
a) Earlier Analysis Used. Identify and state where they are available for review. b) Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. c) Mitigation Measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Measures Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures, which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site specific conditions for the Project. 6) Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated.
7) Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used, or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. 8) This is only a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different formats; however, lead agencies should normally address the questions from this checklist that are relevant to a Project’s environmental effects in whatever format is selected.
9) The explanation of each issue should identify:
a) The significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and b) The mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impacts to less than significance.
The Wren Multiple-Family Development Project Initial Study Exhibit 1: Regional Map
13 October 2024
Exhibit 1: Regional Map
Project Location
The Wren Multiple-Family Development Project Initial Study Exhibit 2: Local Vicinity Map
14 October 2024
Exhibit 2: Local Vicinity Map
670-110-043
Project Location
30th Avenue
Date Palm Drive
Rosemount Road
(to be extended)
McCallum Way
Secondary Drive Aisles
(to be constructed)
The Wren Multiple-Family Development Project Initial Study Exhibit 3: Existing and Proposed Land Use
15 October 2024
Exhibit 3: Existing and Proposed Land Use
Existing Land Use: General Commercial
Proposed Land Use: RMH-Medium High Density Residential
*Amend General Plan Land Use from General Commercial (CG) to Medium High Density Residential (RMH)
The Wren Multiple-Family Development Project Initial Study Exhibit 4: Site Plan
16 October 2024
Exhibit 4: Site Plan
The Wren Multiple-Family Development Project Initial Study Exhibit 5: Landscape Plan
17 October 2024
Exhibit 5: Landscape Plan
(TO INSERT LATEST PLAN PRIOR TO PUBLIC CIRCULATION)
The Wren Multiple-Family Development Project Initial Study 18 October 2024
I. AESTHETICS
Except as provided in Public Resources
Code Section 21099, would the project:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic
vista? ✓
b) Substantially damage scenic resources,
including, but not limited to, trees, rock
outcroppings, and historic buildings within a
state scenic highway?
✓
c) In non-urbanized areas, substantially
degrade the existing visual character or quality
of public views of the site and its
surroundings? (Public views are those that are
experienced from publicly accessible vantage
point). If the project is in an urbanized area,
would the project conflict with applicable
zoning and other regulations governing scenic
quality?
✓
d) Create a new source of substantial light or
glare which would adversely affect day or
nighttime views in the area?
✓
Sources: City of Cathedral City 2040 General Plan; City of Cathedral City General Plan Update DEIR, 2019; Cathedral City Zoning Ordinance; Project Site Plan; Project materials; Google Earth Pro.
Environmental Setting
The City of Cathedral City, including the project site, is located in the Coachella Valley which is a desert valley that extends approximately 45 miles in Riverside County, southeast from the San Gorgonio Pass to the northern shore of the Salton Sea.
Surrounding mountains include the San Jacinto Mountains, the foothills, and slopes of which ascend from the Valley floor and form the westerly boundary of the Coachella Valley. At its peak, Mount San Jacinto rises to an elevation of 10,834 feet above mean sea level. The Santa Rosa Mountains, with Toro Peak at an elevation of 8,715 feet above mean sea level, generally form the southerly boundary of the valley. In the northerly portion of the valley are the Indio Hills, with elevations rising to about 1,600 feet, and the Little San Bernardino Mountains further north, forming the northeasterly boundary of the valley.
The Project Site occurs in a mixed-use urban environment, in the central portion of the City. The current urban environment includes single family homes, commercial and retail businesses, a church to the north and major roadways. The Project Site is currently vacant and undeveloped. The Project is proposed to consist of 204 apartment homes. The Proposed Project will be completed a single construction phase.
The site is not located along a State-designated scenic roadway or highway1; however, the Project Site is located along Date Palm Drive, which is a locally identified scenic image corridor (General Plan Exhibit 1 California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), California State Scenic Highways. https://dot.ca.gov/programs/design/lap-landscape-architecture-and-community-livability/lap-liv-i-scenic-highways, accessed June 8, 2024.
The Wren Multiple-Family Development Project Initial Study 19 October 2024
CM-4). Development along a scenic image corridor requires special setbacks and landscaping to limit impacts to existing viewsheds and visual character along the corridor.
Discussion of Impacts
a) Less Than Significant Impact. A scenic vista is generally identified as a public vantage viewpoint that provides expansive views of a highly valued landscape for the benefit of the general public. Common examples may include a public vantage point that provides expansive views of undeveloped hillsides, ridgelines, and open space areas that provide a unifying visual backdrop to a developed area.
The Project Site is currently vacant. Date Palm Drive borders the site on the west, existing residential communities occur immediately east and vacant lands occur to the south. The surrounding area is developing with commercial and residential uses, consistent with the City’s General Plan.
The City’s scenic vistas, as described in the General Plan, include the San Jacinto and Santa Rosa mountain ranges to the west, and to a lesser extent the San Gorgonio and Little San Bernardino ranges to the northwest and north, respectively. There are no significant scenic vistas to the east in the City.
The Project site occurs on the east side of Date Palm Drive, and has clear and unobstructed views of the San Jacinto range to the west, and Edom Hill and the Little San Bernardino mountains to the north and northeast. Development of the Project will not impact views to the west for travelers on Date Palm, as the Project occurs on the east side of the street. Views to the north will remain, but views of Edom Hill to the northeast will be impacted for the length of the Project site, since 3 story buildings are proposed along the frontage. This view blockage, however, will be temporary for travelers on Date Palm.
As described above, Date Palm Drive is designated an Image Corridor in the General Plan.
The Project proposes to fully improve Date Palm Drive along its property frontage, and consistent with City standards, will include a 16 foot parkway, including an 8 foot sidewalk and 8 foot landscaped area. The landscaping plans for the Project (Appendix H) include substantial plantings in this parkway, including palms which are consistently planted along Date Palm Drive and will provide a consistency to the corridor. Shrubs and groundcovers will also be planted to provide a comprehensive appearance to the Project frontage, and reduce impacts to the Image Corridor to less than significant levels.
Views for travelers on Alexander Drive, east of the site in the existing single family subdivision, are also to the west and north. Westerly views are currently obstructed by the existing homes, but scenic vistas of the top of the San Jacinto range remain. Construction of the Project will result in further obstruction of westerly views, but it is expected that the top of the range will remain visible for travelers on Alexander Drive, because of the distance between the roadway and the Project, the view corridors offered through the Project by driveways and limited building mass, and the lower 2 story buildings proposed along the eastern portion of the Project. Therefore, although views to the west will be obstructed by the Project, they already are impacted for travelers on Alexander Drive, and the impact of the Project will be less than significant. Views to the north on Alexander Drive are currently partially blocked by houses, and the construction of the Project will not affect those views, as the Project will occur to the west, outside the northerly sightline on the street.
The Wren Multiple-Family Development Project Initial Study 20 October 2024
Views for travelers on 30th Avenue are to the west and north. Northerly views will not be impacted by the Project, as it occurs south of 30th Avenue. Views to the west will also not be impacted, because the Project will be outside the westerly sightline. Views to the southwest, of the Santa Rosa range, will be partially obstructed by the 3 story buildings along Date Palm, but due to distance, the mid-range and tops of the range will remain visible, similar to the condition currently created by the church building. These impacts will be short-term for travelers on the roadway, and will not be substantially increased by the Project. Therefore, impacts associated with scenic vistas on 30th Avenue will be less than significant.
Therefore, potential impacts associated with scenic vistas would be less than significant, and no mitigation would be required.
General Plan Amendment Analysis: The Project Site is not a scenic vista. Development of a commercial project consistent with City standards would result in substantial structures of up to 35 feet in height on the property. Although the mass of these structures would likely be less than the massing proposed for the Project, the height would be comparable, and like the proposed Project, would result in partial blocking of the San Jacinto range to the west, likely with view corridors between structures and through parking lots. Ridgelines and the top of the range would likely be visible from public streets to the east of the site. Therefore, there is a less than significant impact associated with scenic vistas to the approval of a GPA to convert the property from commercial to residential uses.
b) No Impact. There are no scenic resources including trees, rock outcroppings, or historic buildings within a State scenic highway on or near the Project Site. The Proposed Project Site is approximately 2 miles east of State Route 111 which is designated by the State as an eligible state scenic highway between I-10 and State Route 74. Given the distance and development that occurs between the Project Site and State Route111, there would be no impact to views from State Route 111. Therefore, there would be no impact to scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway because no state scenic highway exists in the vicinity of the Project Site, and the Project Site cannot be seen from the nearest designed State scenic highway.
General Plan Amendment Analysis: The Project Site is not located on a State scenic highway.
Therefore, no impacts would occur if the development were a commercial or residential project with respect to impacts on scenic highways. There would be no impact with respect to the approval of a GPA to convert the property from commercial to residential uses. c) Less Than Significant Impact. The Project Site is currently vacant and in an urbanized area that supports a mix of development, including commercial and residential land uses. The Proposed Project includes development of an apartment complex in an area where substantial residential development zoned R1 that exists immediately to the east, and planned commercial exists to the south and west. The Proposed Project would change the zoning from Planned Community Commercial to Multiple-Family Residential (R3). The Proposed Project has been designed in accordance with the City’s development standards which specify a maximum height of structures permitted in the R3 zoning designation as 35 feet, except where the building is within 30 feet of property zoned RE, R1 or R2.The Proposed Project’s structures are all proposed more than 70 feet from the residences along the east side, which is greater than 30 feet from the R1 zoned residential properties.. Additionally, the apartment complex is designed with building shapes, configuration, colors, visual screening, landscaping, and architectural elements that reduce massing to ensure a visually appealing appearance that The Wren Multiple-Family Development Project Initial Study 21 October 2024
would blend with the existing and planned urban environment. Therefore, impacts associated with degrading the visual character or quality of public views, in general, are expected to be less than significant.
The Project would be developed along the east side of Date Palm Drive, which is identified in the General Plan as an Image Corridor. To address the locally important Image Corridor status along Date Palm Drive, the Project has been designed, as described in subsection (a) above, to include substantial landscaping within the public parkway. In addition, a decorative block wall along the Date Palm Drive frontage and an increased building setback from Date Palm Drive are consistent with the City’s standards for Image Corridors.
Therefore, the Proposed Project would have a less than significant impact with respect to conflicts with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality in an urbanized area because the Proposed Project has been designed in accordance with City standards designed to protect the urbanized area’s scenic quality.
General Plan Amendment Analysis: A commercial development would also be constructed in accordance with City standards. However, as the Project Site is currently zoned PCC, buildings can be up to 36 feet high, whereas the Proposed multi-family residential development is limited to 35 feet high, with lower building heights for areas adjacent to residential development. The design of the Proposed Project’s multi-family apartment complex offers significant visual separation from the residential area to the east whereas a commercial project constructed in the PCC zone is not required to provide a 30-foot separation between the commercial buildings and the residences to the east. Therefore, there is a less than significant impact to the approval of a GPA to convert the property from commercial to residential uses.
d) Less Than Significant Impact. The Proposed Project is located in an urban environment that includes existing sources of light and glare associated with nearby land uses. Nearby sources of light include exterior lighting on commercial and residential buildings, street lighting on the adjacent Date Palm Drive, passing vehicle headlights, and outdoor lighting on surface parking lots.
The site is currently vacant and there is no lighting onsite.
Short-Term (Construction-Related) Impacts
Nighttime construction is not anticipated. Therefore, short-term construction lighting impacts are not anticipated.
Long-Term (Operations-Related) Impacts
Long-term lighting impacts will be mitigated by adherence to and designed in accordance with the City’s Municipal Code (Chapter 9.89 Outdoor Lighting Standards)2 and will properly shield light fixtures to minimize spillage onto adjacent properties. Furthermore, the Project does not propose any highly reflective or glare inducing materials. The Zoning Ordinance design standards will be incorporated to assure that the Proposed impacts related to long-term lighting would be less than significant. Lighting proposed within the Project will include landscape lighting, pole lighting at 18 feet in height, and wall lighting for the apartment buildings. A Photometrics Plan has been developed for the Project based on the lighting plan that identifies that the lighting standards would be met (refer to Appendix H). As shown in that plan, the lighting proposed within the Project is 2 City Municipal Code, http://qcode.us/codes/cathedralcity, Accessed June 2024.
The Wren Multiple-Family Development Project Initial Study 22 October 2024
placed to assure that no lighting occurs off the property, and is shielded downward consistent with City requirements to protect adjacent property from light, particularly to the east where single family homes occur. Therefore, the Project’s impacts relating to lighting will be less than significant.
General Plan Amendment Analysis: As with the Proposed Project, a commercial project would also be prohibited from night-time lighting during construction. Similarly, a commercial project would create a new source of substantial light or glare in the area. For the commercial project, any long-term lighting would also be required to provide a photometrics analysis that identifies that on-site lighting is consistent with City standards. Therefore, there is a less than significant impact to the approval of a GPA to convert the property from commercial to residential uses.
Mitigation Measures:
None required.
Monitoring:
None required.
The Wren Multiple-Family Development Project Initial Study 23 October 2024
II. AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY RESOURCES
In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland.
In determining whether impacts to forest resources, including timberland, are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to information compiled by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection regarding the state’s inventory of forest land, including the Forest and Range Assessment Project and the Forest Legacy Assessment Project; and forest carbon measurement methodology provided in Forest Protocols adopted by the California Air Resources Board.
Would the Project:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique
Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide
Importance (Farmland), as shown on the
maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland
Mapping and Monitoring Program of the
California Resources Agency, to nonagricultural use?
✓
b) Conflict with existing zoning for
agricultural use, or a Williamson Act
contract?
✓
c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause
rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public
Resources Code section 12220(g)),
timberland (as defined by Public Resources
Code section 4526), or timberland zoned
Timberland Production (as defined by
Government Code section 51104(g))?
✓
d) Result in the loss of forest land or
conversion of forest land to non-forest use? ✓
e) Involve other changes in the existing
environment which, due to their location or
nature, could result in conversion of
Farmland, to non-agricultural use or
conversion of forest land to non-forest use?
✓
Sources: City of Cathedral City 2040 General Plan; City of Cathedral City General Plan Update DEIR, 2019; Cathedral City Zoning Ordinance; Project materials; Google Earth Pro; “Riverside County Important Farmland 2018 Map,” sheet 2 of 3, California Department of Conservation.
Environmental Setting
The Project Site has a land use designation of General Commercial (CG) on the City’s General Plan Land Use Map. The Project Site has a zoning designation of Planned Community Commercial (PCC) on the City’s Zoning Map.
The vacant Project Site is designated on the Riverside County Important Farmland Map as “Other Land” and the surrounding developed lands are designated as “Urban and Built Up.” There are no active agricultural or forest lands within the vicinity of the Project.
The Wren Multiple-Family Development Project Initial Study 24 October 2024
Discussion of Impacts
a-e) No Impact.
Prime Farmland: There is no prime farmland located in the vicinity of the proposed Project. The Project would not convert farmland to non-agricultural use. No impacts would occur, and no mitigation measures would be required.
Williamson Act: There is no land within Cathedral City under agricultural zoning or Williamson Act Contract. No impacts would occur, and no mitigation measures would be required.
Forest Land: The Project Site is located on the desert floor, currently zoned as Planned Community Commercial (PCC), and surrounded by urban uses. The Project Site does not contain forest land, timberland or timberland zoned for timberland production. The Project would not rezone forest land or timberland as defined by the Public Resources Code and Government Code.
No impacts would occur, and no mitigation measures would be required.
General Plan Amendment Analysis: There would be no impact to the approval of a General Plan Amendment because the Project Site conditions are the same as with the Proposed Project with respect to agricultural resources.
Mitigation Measures:
None required.
Monitoring:
None required.
The Wren Multiple-Family Development Project Initial Study 25 October 2024
III. AIR QUALITY
Where available, the significance criteria
established by the applicable air quality
management district or air pollution control
district may be relied upon to make the
following determinations.
Would the Project:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of
the applicable air quality plan? ✓
b) Result in a cumulatively considerable net
increase of any criteria pollutant for which the
project region is non-attainment under an
applicable federal or state ambient air quality
standard?
✓
c) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial
pollutant concentrations? ✓
d) Result in other emissions (such as those
leading to odors) adversely affecting a
substantial number of people?
✓
Sources: City of Cathedral City 2040 General Plan; City of Cathedral City General Plan Update DEIR, 2019; Project materials; Date Palm Apartments Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Study, Prepared by MD Acoustics, August 30, 2024 (Appendix A).
Environmental Setting
An air quality analysis was prepared for the Proposed Project to evaluate existing air quality conditions in Cathedral City and to assess future air quality impacts associated with implementation of the Project. The findings of the analysis by MD Acoustics can be found in Appendix A.
Regional and local agencies have assumed responsibility for assuring that state and federal air quality standards are achieved. For the Coachella Valley, the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) is responsible for establishing air quality measurement criteria and relevant management policies for the Salton Sea Air Basin (SSAB). The 2003 PM10 Coachella Valley State Implementation Plan (CVSIP) was jointly developed by the SCAQMD, Coachella Valley Association of Governments (CVAG) and its member jurisdictions (including the County) and was approved by the USEPA. The 2003 PM10 CVSIP updated the 1990 plan, which was drafted as a requirement of the federal Clean Air Act to demonstrate expeditious attainment of PM10 standards.3 On April 18, 2003, USEPA approved the updated CVSIP.
The SSAB, including the Coachella Valley, is subject to the provisions of the SCAQMD Rule Book,4 which sets forth policies and other measures designed to meet federal and state ambient air quality standards. These rules, along with SCAQMD’s 2016 Air Quality Management Plan are intended to satisfy the planning requirements of both the federal and state Clean Air Acts. The SCAQMD adopted the 2022 AQMP on December 2, 2022, to address the attainment of the 2015 8-hour ozone standard (70 ppb) for the South Coast Air Basin and Coachella Valley. To meet this standard, the AQMP determined NOx emissions must be reduced by 67% more than is required by adopted rules and regulations by 2037. The control strategy for the 2022 AQMP includes aggressive new regulations and the development of incentive programs to support early deployment of advanced technologies. 3 2003 Coachella Valley PM10 State Implementation Plan, August 1, 2003. 4 South Coast Air Quality Management District Rules and Regulations, Adopted February 4, 1977.
The Wren Multiple-Family Development Project Initial Study 26 October 2024
The SCAQMD also monitors daily pollutant levels and meteorological conditions throughout the SCAQMD jurisdictional area.
Air Quality Standards
Both the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the California Air Resources Board (CARB) have established ambient air quality standards for specific pollutants, which are called “criteria pollutants,” and are designed to protect the general population and especially that segment of the population that is most susceptible to respiratory distress or infection, including the elderly, children, asthmatics, or those weak from disease or illness. The following air pollutants are collectively known as criteria air pollutants and are defined as those pollutants for which established air quality standards have been adopted by federal and state governments:
Ozone (O3) is a pungent, colorless, toxic gas, and a component of photochemical smog. It is formed when byproducts of combustion react in the presence of ultraviolet sunlight. This process takes place in the atmosphere where oxides of nitrogen combine with reactive organic gases, such as hydrocarbons.
Exposure to ozone can result in diminished breathing capacity, increased sensitivity to infections, and inflammation of the lung tissue. Children and people with pre-existing lung disease are most susceptible to the effects of ozone.
Carbon Monoxide (CO) is a colorless, odorless, toxic gas and a byproduct from the partial combustion of fossil fuels, most notably from automobiles and other motor vehicles. Carbon monoxide passes through the lungs directly into the blood stream and reduces the amount of oxygen reaching the vital organs, such as the heart, brain, and tissues. In high concentrations, carbon monoxide can contribute to the development of heart disease, anemia, and impaired psychological behavior. Individuals that have heart and blood diseases, smokers, babies in utero, and people with chronic hypoxemia are most susceptible to the effects of CO. The SSAB is in non-attainment for the federal 8-hour O3 standard.
Nitrogen Oxide (NOx) includes Nitric oxide (NO) and Nitrogen dioxide (NO2), which are the primary oxides of nitrogen, and combined are known as nitrogen oxides. These oxides are produced at high temperatures during combustion as byproducts of motor vehicles, power plants, and off-road equipment.
NOx contributes to the formation of ozone serving as the primary receptor of ultraviolet light and initiating the photochemical reaction. Short-term exposure to nitrogen dioxide can result in airway constriction, diminished lung capacity, and is highly toxic by inhalation. Populations living near roadways are more likely to experience effects of nitrogen oxides due to elevated exposure to motor vehicle exhaust. The SSAB is in attainment for NO2.
Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) results from the combustion of high-sulfur content fuels, such as coal and petroleum.
Sources include motor vehicle fuel combustion, chemical manufacturing plants, and sulfur recovery plants. Sulfur dioxide is a colorless, pungent, extremely irritating gas that can cause airway constriction and severe breathing difficulties in asthmatics. High levels of exposure can cause fluid accumulation in the lungs, damage to lung tissue, and sloughing off of cells lining the respiratory tract. The SSAB is in attainment for SO2.
Particulate Matter (PM10 and PM2.5) consist of fine suspended particles of ten microns or smaller in diameter, and are the byproducts of road dust, sand, diesel soot, windstorms, and the abrasion of tires and brakes. The elderly, children, and adults with pre-existing respiratory or cardiovascular disease are most susceptible to the effects of PM. Elevated PM10 and PM2.5 levels are also associated with an increase in mortality rates, respiratory infections, occurrences and severity of asthma attacks and hospital admissions.
The SSAB is a non- attainment area for PM10 and is classified as attainment/unclassifiable for PM2.5.
The Wren Multiple-Family Development Project Initial Study 27 October 2024
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) are also known as Reactive Organic Gas (ROG). This class of pollutants has no state or federal ambient air quality standards and is not classified as criteria pollutants; however, they are regulated because they are responsible for contributing to the formation of ozone. They also contribute to higher PM10 levels because they transform into organic aerosols when released into the atmosphere. VOCs pose a health threat when people are exposed to high concentrations. Benzene, for example, is a hydrogen component of VOC emissions known to be a carcinogen.
Lead (Pb) occurs in the atmosphere as particulate matter resulting from the manufacturing of batteries, paint, ink, and ammunition. Exposure to lead can result in anemia, kidney disease, gastrointestinal dysfunction, and neuromuscular and neurological disorders. Babies in utero, infants, and children are especially susceptible to health risks associated with exposure to lead by impacting the central nervous system and cause learning disorders. The SSAB is in attainment for lead.
Attainment Criteria
The air quality of a particular locale is generally considered to be in attainment if the measured ambient air pollutant levels for O3, CO, SO2 (1-hour and 24-hour), NO2, and PM10 and PM2.5 are not exceeded, and all other standards are not equaled or exceeded at any time in any consecutive three-year period.
Areas that meet ambient air quality standards are classified as attainment areas, while areas that do not meet these standards are classified as nonattainment areas. The Riverside County portion of the Salton Sea Air Basin is designated as a nonattainment area for the federal O3 standards and is also a nonattainment area for the state standards for O3 and PM10.
The climate of the Coachella Valley is a continental, desert-type climate, with hot summers, mild winters, and very little annual rainfall. Precipitation is less than six inches annually and occurs mostly in the winter months from late November to early April with summers often being completely dry. Temperatures exceed 100 degrees Fahrenheit (°F), on the average, for four months each year during the summer.
The Coachella Valley and adjacent areas are exposed to frequent gusty winds. The flat terrain of the valley and strong temperature differentials, created by intense solar heating, produce moderate winds and deep thermal convection. High winds occur most frequently in April and May. Prevailing winds are from the northwest through southwest, with monsoonal flows from the southeast. Stronger winds tend to occur closer to the foothills with less frequent winds over all areas of the Valley.
Within the Project area, there is a natural sand migration process, called “blowsand,” that has direct and indirect effects on air quality. As mentioned above, blowsand produces particulate matter (PM10) consisting of fine suspended particles of ten microns or smaller in diameter, and are the byproducts of road dust, sand, diesel soot, windstorms, and the abrasion of tires and brakes.
Methodology
CalEEMod version 2022.1.1.20 air quality model was utilized for the proposed Project to determine construction and operational air quality and greenhouse gas emissions, and the model results are contained in Appendix A.
The Wren Multiple-Family Development Project Initial Study 28 October 2024
Air Quality Regional Emission Thresholds
The SCAQMD has developed regional significance thresholds for criteria pollutants. Any projects in the SSAB with daily emissions that exceed any of the indicated thresholds should be considered as having an individually and cumulatively significant air quality impact.
The following SCAQMD significance thresholds for construction emissions are established for the SSAB:
• 75 pounds per day (lbs/day) of VOC
• 100 lbs/day of NOx
• 550 lbs/day of CO
• 150 lbs/day of PM10
• 55 lbs/day of PM2.5
• 150 lbs/day of SO2
Discussion of Impacts
a) Less Than Significant Impact. CEQA requires a discussion of any inconsistencies between the Proposed Project and applicable General Plans and regional plans (State CEQA Guidelines Section 15125). The air quality plan that applies to the Proposed Project is the 2022 AQMP. This section discusses any potential inconsistencies of the Proposed Project with the 2022 AQMP.
The Project Site is located within the SSAB and is subject to SCAQMD’s 2022 AQMP and the 2003 CV PM10 SIP. The SCAQMD is principally responsible for air pollution control and works directly with the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), county transportation commissions, local governments, as well as state and federal agencies to reduce emissions from stationary, mobile, and indirect sources to meet state and federal ambient air quality standards.
The Project Site has a land use designation of General Commercial (CG) on the City’s General Plan Land Use Map. The Project Site has a zoning designation of Planned Community Commercial (PCC) on the City’s Zoning Map. The type of use of the proposed Project is not allowed within the PCC zone. As such the Project proposes a zoning change to Multiple-Family Residential (R3) and a General Plan Amendment from General Commercial to Medium-High Residential to allow for the 204-apartment home development.
The SCAQMD CEQA Handbook states that "New or amended General Plan Elements (including land use zoning and density amendments), Specific Plans, and significant projects must be analyzed for consistency with the AQMP." Strict consistency with all aspects of the plan is usually not required. A proposed project should be considered to be consistent with the AQMP if it furthers one or more policies and does not obstruct other policies. The SCAQMD CEQA Handbook identifies two key indicators of consistency:
Criterion 1: Whether the project will result in an increase in the frequency or severity of existing air quality violations or cause or contribute to new violations or delay timely attainment of air quality standards or the interim emission reductions specified in the AQMP.
Criterion 2: Whether the project will exceed the assumptions in the AQMP in 2022 or increments based on the year of project buildout and phase.
The Wren Multiple-Family Development Project Initial Study 29 October 2024
Criterion 1 – Increase in the Frequency or Severity of Violations Based on the air quality modeling analysis contained in Appendix A, neither short-term construction impacts, nor long-term operations would result in significant impacts based on the SCAQMD regional and local thresholds of significance.
As such, the Proposed Project is not projected to contribute to the exceedance of any air pollutant concentration standards that would increase in the frequency or severity of violations, nor would the Proposed Project cause a delay in attainment because criteria pollutants are well below the thresholds. Therefore, the Project is consistent with the 2022 AQMP for Criterion 1.
Criterion 2 – Exceed Assumptions in the AQMP?
Consistency with the AQMP assumptions is determined by performing an analysis of the Proposed Project with the assumptions in the AQMP. The emphasis of this criterion is to ensure that the analyses conducted for the Proposed Project are based on the same forecasts as the AQMP. The 2024-2050 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (2024-2050 RTP/SCS), prepared by the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) includes chapters on: the challenges in a changing region, creating a plan for our future, and the road to greater mobility and sustainable growth. These chapters currently respond directly to federal and state requirements placed on SCAG. Local governments are required to use these as the basis of their plans for purposes of consistency with applicable regional plans under CEQA.
And though the Project would require a change in land use from commercial to residential, the Proposed Project has been designed consistent with City standards which meet or exceed the assumptions in the AQMP and RTP/SCS with respect to mobility and sustainability. The AQMP and RTP/SCS assumptions are based on data from the entire region it serves and provide general guidelines for the jurisdictions to follow to achieve various goals. The impact of changing a 10.48 acre parcel from commercial to residential in the City, particularly since the traffic generated by commercial development is substantially higher than that generated by residential uses, and where the air quality impacts of the Proposed Project do not trigger criteria pollutants would not exceed the assumptions in the AQMP. The AQMP is also updated every five years. All jurisdictions under the AQMP would provide updated land use data at that time.
Therefore, the Project would not conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan, and impacts would be less than significant.
General Plan Amendment Analysis: The Project Site is currently zoned PCC, which broadly includes retail, fast food, hotel, and numerous other commercial uses. The Project site has been designated for commercial development for a number of years. The current AQMP is based, in part, on local jurisdictions’ land use assumptions. Therefore, the SCAQMD has assumed commercial development for the site in its planning documents. The most significant contributor to air quality impacts in the City is vehicle traffic. A commercial project on the current site could consist of a mix of uses, but would likely be developed as a shopping center, with multiple users and buildings. Based on the City’s standards for the PCC zone, the need for parking, landscaping and ancillary facilities, the site could accommodate a shopping center of about 172,000 square The Wren Multiple-Family Development Project Initial Study 30 October 2024
feet. Such a shopping center would generate about 6,400 daily trips5. As described in Section XVII, Transportation, the Project will generate 1,375 daily trips. As described above, the Project would not significantly impact implementation of regional plans. Since the development of a commercial project would generate higher trips and result in greater emissions, the implementation of the GPA in this case will result in a beneficial impact, reducing the emissions generated from the site, and therefore reducing the emissions estimated in the AQMP. b) Less Than Significant with Mitigation. The Project Site is in the SSAB, which is designated as a non-attainment area for PM10 under state standards and for ozone and PM2.5 under both state and federal standards (Appendix A).
Based on the analysis provided in Appendix A, the Proposed Project would result in short-term emissions from construction associated with site grading/preparation, utilities installation, construction of buildings, and paving. The Proposed Project would also generate operational emissions associated with new vehicle traffic and energy use.
Construction Impacts
The latest version of CalEEMod was used to estimate the onsite and offsite construction emissions.
The emissions assumptions incorporate SCAQMD Rule 402 and 403. Rule 402 and 403 (fugitive dust), which are standard requirements for projects in the valley.
Appendix A studied the Project’s construction and operational emissions, and found that construction emissions would exceed the SCAQMD’s daily emission thresholds at the regional level for VOCs, if building construction would occur at the same time as painting. Therefore, Mitigation Measure AIR-1 which requires the interior architectural coatings/paint VOC content to be no greater than 45 grams VOC per liter is incorporated. Table 1: Regional Significance – Unmitigated and Mitigated Construction Emissions (pounds/day) (the following page) identifies that with the incorporation of AIR-1, impacts to regional air quality would be less than significant. 5 Institute of Transportation Engineers, “TripGen” for land use category 820. Accessed September 19, 2024.
The Wren Multiple-Family Development Project Initial Study 31 October 2024
Table 1: Regional Significance – Unmitigated and Mitigated Construction Emissions (pounds/day)
Activity
Pollutant Emissions(pounds/day)
VOC NOx CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5
Unmitigated
Site Preparation
On-Site2 3.65 35.95 32.93 0.05 6.71 4.10
Off-Site3 0.07 0.11 1.03 0.00 0.23 0.05
Total 3.72 36.06 33.96 0.05 6.94 4.15
Grading
On-Site2 3.52 34.29 30.17 0.06 3.84 2.28
Off-Site3 0.08 0.12 1.18 0.00 0.26 0.06
Total 3.60 34.41 31.35 0.06 4.10 2.34
Building Construction
On-Site2 1.20 11.22 13.12 0.02 0.50 0.46
Off-Site3 1.04 12.39 19.05 0.01 2.65 0.65
Total 2.24 23.61 32.17 0.03 3.15 1.10
Paving
On-Site2 1.60 7.45 9.98 0.01 0.35 0.32
Off-Site3 0.20 0.41 1.58 0.00 0.29 0.07
Total 1.80 7.87 11.56 0.02 0.63 0.39
Architectural Coating
On-Site2 74.73 0.88 1.14 0.00 0.03 0.03
Off-Site3 0.19 0.19 3.42 0.00 0.47 0.11
Total 74.92 1.07 4.56 0.00 0.50 0.14
Total of overlapping phases4 78.96 32.55 48.28 0.05 4.28 1.63 SCAQMD Thresholds 75 100 550 150 150 55
Exceeds Thresholds Yes No No No No No
Mitigated
Site Preparation
On-Site2 3.65 35.95 32.93 0.05 6.71 4.10
Off-Site3 0.07 0.11 1.03 0.00 0.23 0.05
Total 3.72 36.06 33.96 0.05 6.94 4.15
Grading
On-Site2 3.52 34.29 30.17 0.06 3.84 2.28
Off-Site3 0.08 0.12 1.18 0.00 0.26 0.06
Total 3.60 34.41 31.35 0.06 4.10 2.34
Building Construction
On-Site2 1.20 11.22 13.12 0.02 0.50 0.46
Off-Site3 1.04 12.39 19.05 0.01 2.65 0.65
Total 2.24 23.61 32.17 0.03 3.15 1.10
Paving
On-Site2 1.60 7.45 9.98 0.01 0.35 0.32
Off-Site3 0.20 0.41 1.58 0.00 0.29 0.07
Total 1.80 7.87 11.56 0.02 0.63 0.39
Architectural Coating
On-Site2 69.52 0.88 1.14 0.00 0.03 0.03
Off-Site3 0.19 0.19 3.42 0.00 0.47 0.11
Total 69.71 1.07 4.56 0.00 0.50 0.14
Total of overlapping phases4 73.75 32.55 48.28 0.05 4.28 1.63 SCAQMD Thresholds 75 100 550 150 150 55
Exceeds Thresholds No No No No No No
The Wren Multiple-Family Development Project Initial Study 32 October 2024
Notes:
1 Source: CalEEMod Version 2022.1.1.2020 2On-site emissions from equipment operated on-site that is not operated on public roads. 3 Off-site emissions from equipment operated on public roads. 4 Construction, architectural coatings and paving phases may overlap.
Operational Impacts
The on-going operation of the Proposed Project would result in a long-term increase in air quality emissions. This increase would be due to emissions from the Project-generated vehicle trips and through operational emissions from the on-going use of the Proposed Project.
The worst-case summer or winter criteria pollutant emissions created from the Proposed Project’s long-term operations have been calculated and are shown in Table 2: Regional Significance - Unmitigated Operational Emissions (lbs/day). As shown, none of the Project’s operational emissions would exceed the SCAQMD’s regional thresholds of significance. Therefore, a less than significant regional air quality impact would occur from operation of the Proposed Project.
Table 2: Regional Significance - Unmitigated Operational Emissions (lbs/day) Activity
Pollutant Emissions(pounds/day)1
VOC NOx CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5
Area Sources2 6.81 0.14 14.89 0.00 0.01 0.01
Energy Usage3 0.04 0.66 0.28 0.00 0.05 0.05
Mobile Sources4 5.37 4.59 40.61 0.09 6.96 1.81
Total Emissions 12.22 5.40 55.78 0.09 7.02 1.87
SCAQMD Thresholds 55 55 550 150 150 55
Exceeds Threshold? No No No No No No
Notes:
1 Source: CalEEMod Version 2022.1.1.20 2 Area sources consist of emissions from consumer products, architectural coatings, and landscaping equipment. 3 Energy usage consists of emissions from on-site natural gas usage. 4 Mobile sources consist of emissions from vehicles and road dust.
Therefore, with the inclusion of mitigation for construction emissions, the Project would not result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the Project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard, and impacts would be less than significant.
General Plan Amendment Analysis: Refer to the General Plan Amendment Analysis discussion provided in (a) above. With the inclusion of mitigation for construction emissions, the Project would not result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the Project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard, and impacts would be less than significant. As described above, a commercial project on the site would result in substantially more vehicle trips than the proposed Project. Although air emissions are not linear, the development of the site for commercial uses would increase emissions of criteria pollutants when compared to the proposed Project. Therefore, the implementation of the GPA will result in lower, and less than significant impacts on air emissions.
The Wren Multiple-Family Development Project Initial Study 33 October 2024
c) Less Than Significant Impact. A sensitive receptor is defined by the SCAQMD as any residence including private homes, condominiums, apartments, and living quarters, schools, preschools, daycare centers and health facilities such as hospitals or retirement and nursing homes. Also included are long term care hospitals, hospices, prisons, and dormitories or similar live-in housing.
Project-related construction air emissions may have the potential to exceed the State and Federal air quality standards in the Project vicinity, even though these pollutant emissions may not be significant enough to create a regional impact to the SSAB. In order to assess local air quality impacts the SCAQMD has developed Localized Significant Thresholds (LSTs) to assess the Project-related air emissions in the Project vicinity. The SCAQMD has also provided Final Localized Significant Threshold Methodology (LST Methodology). The Localized Significant Threshold Methodology found that the primary emissions of concern are NO2, CO, PM10, and PM2.5.
Construction
The local air quality emissions from Project construction were analyzed using the SCAQMD’s Mass Rate Localized Significant Threshold Look-up Tables (refer to Appendix A). The emission thresholds were based on the Coachella Valley source receptor area (SRA 30) and a disturbance of 4 acres per day, at a distance of 25 meters (82 feet). The SCAQMD recommends using the 25 meter threshold for any distance below 25 meters. The closest receptor would be approximately 3 meters, or approximately 9.8 feet.
Table 3: Localized Significance – Construction, below, identifies that none of the analyzed criteria pollutants would exceed the local emissions thresholds at the nearest sensitive receptors.
Table 3: Localized Significance – Construction
Phase
On-Site Pollutant Emissions(pounds/day)1
NOx CO PM10 PM2.5
Site Preparation 35.95 32.93 6.71 4.10
Grading 34.29 30.17 3.84 2.28
Building Construction 11.22 13.12 0.50 0.46
Paving 7.45 9.98 0.35 0.32
Architectural Coating 0.88 1.14 0.03 0.03
Total of overlapping phases 19.56 24.24 0.87 0.80
SCAQMD Threshold for 25 meters(82 feet) or less2 191 1,299 7 5 Exceeds Threshold? No No No No
Notes:
1 Source: Calculated from CalEEMod and SCAQMD’s Mass Rate Look-up Tables for two acres in Coachella Valley Source Receptor Area (SRA 30).
Project will disturb a maximum of 3.5 acres per day (see Table 7 in Appendix A). 2 The nearest sensitive receptor is located approximately 9.8 feet to the east; therefore, the 25-meter threshold has been used.
Operations
Table 4: Localized Significance – Unmitigated Operational Emissions, below, shows the calculated emissions for the proposed operational activities compared with appropriate LSTs. The LST analysis only includes on-site sources; however, the CalEEMod software outputs do not separate on-site and off-site emissions for mobile sources. For a worst-case scenario assessment, the emissions shown in Table 4 include all on-site Project-related stationary sources and 10% of The Wren Multiple-Family Development Project Initial Study 34 October 2024
the Project-related new mobile sources. This percentage is an estimate of the amount of Projectrelated new vehicle traffic that would occur on-site. Table 4 indicates that the local operational emission would not exceed the LST thresholds at the nearest sensitive receptors, located adjacent to the Project.
Table 4: Localized Significance – Unmitigated Operational Emissions On-Site Emission Source
On-Site Pollutant Emissions(pounds/day)1
NOx CO PM10 PM2.5
Area Sources2 0.14 14.89 0.01 0.01
Energy Usage3 0.66 0.28 0.05 0.05
On-Site Vehicle Emissions4 0.46 4.06 0.70 0.18
Total Emissions 1.26 19.23 0.76 0.24
SCAQMD Threshold for 25 meters(82 feet)5 304 2,292 4 2
Exceeds Threshold? No No No No
Notes:
1 Source: Calculated from CalEEMod and SCAQMD’s Mass Rate Look-up Tables for 5 acres in Coachella Valley Source Receptor Area (SRA 30). The Project will be approximately 11.48 acres. 2 Area sources consist of emissions from consumer products, architectural coatings, and landscaping equipment. 3 Energy usage consists of emissions from generation of electricity and on-site natural gas usage. 4 On-site vehicular emissions based on 1/10 of the gross vehicular emissions and road dust. 5 The nearest sensitive receptor is located adjacent approximately 9.8 feet to the east; therefore, the 25-meter threshold has been used.
Health Impacts
As described above, neither construction nor operation of the Project will result in criteria emissions that are above the SCAQMD significance thresholds, and neither would violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation.
With today’s technology, it is not scientifically possible to calculate the degree to which exposure to various levels of criteria pollutant emissions will impact an individual’s health. There are several factors that make predicting a Project-specific numerical impact difficult:
• Not all individuals will be affected equally due to medical history. Some may have medical pre-dispositions and diet and exercise levels tend to vary across a population. • Due to the dispersing nature of pollutants, it is difficult to locate and identify which group of individuals will be impacted, either directly or indirectly. • There are currently no approved methodologies or studies to base assumptions on, such as baseline health levels or emission level-to-health risk ratios.
Due to the limitations described above, the extent to which the Project poses a health risk is uncertain but unavoidable. However, given that it is anticipated that impacts associated with all criteria pollutants will be less than significant overall, health effects will also be less than significant.
Therefore, the Proposed Project would not expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations, and impacts would be less than significant.
The Wren Multiple-Family Development Project Initial Study 35 October 2024
General Plan Amendment Analysis: Refer to the General Plan Amendment Analysis discussion provided in (a) above. Construction and operation of a commercial use would also expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations. Any commercial project constructed would be required to comply with the same Federal, State, and local regulations regarding reducing air pollutants as the Proposed Project. Given that the same amount of land would be disturbed if a commercial project were developed, localized impacts would be similar to those analyzed in Table 3 for construction, and would be less than significant. Localized operational impacts would be higher than those analyzed in Table 4, based on the significant likely increase in vehicle trips.
Therefore, the implementation of the GPA would likely reduce localized impacts and they will remain less than significant.
d) Less Than Significant Impact. The potential for the proposed Project to generate objectionable odors has also been considered. Odors may include agricultural uses (livestock and farming), wastewater treatment plants, food processing plants, chemical plants, composting operations, refineries, landfills, dairies, and fiberglass molding facilities.
The Project does not contain any land uses associated with emitting objectionable odors. Potential temporary odor sources associated with the proposed Project may result from construction (e.g., equipment exhaust, application of asphalt and architectural coatings). The construction odor emissions would be temporary, short-term, and intermittent in nature and would cease upon completion of construction and are thus considered less than significant. Potential long term odor sources may arise from solid waste. The City will condition the Project to include covered and walled solid waste enclosures, and Project-generated refuse would be removed at regular intervals in compliance with the Burrtec contracts. The proposed Project would also be required to comply with SCAQMD Rule 402 to prevent occurrences of public nuisances. Therefore, odors associated with the proposed Project construction and operations would be less than significant and no mitigation is required.
Mitigation Measures:
AIR-1: Should building construction and architectural coatings/painting occur simultaneously, the volatile organic compound (VOC) content should be no greater than 45 grams VOC per liter for interior paint.
Monitoring:
AIR-A: The Project contractor shall provide the City’s Building Department with written substantiation that paint to be used for the Project does not exceed 45 grams VOC per liter prior to the initiation of any building coating.
Responsible Parties: City Building Department.
The Wren Multiple-Family Development Project Initial Study 36 October 2024
IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES
Would the Project:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either
directly or through habitat modifications, on
any species identified as a candidate, sensitive,
or special status species in local or regional
plans, policies, or regulations, or by the
California Department of Fish and Game or
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
✓
b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any
riparian habitat or other sensitive natural
community identified in local or regional plans,
policies, regulations or by the California
Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and
Wildlife Service?
✓
c) Have a substantial adverse effect on State or
federally protected wetlands (including, but not
limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.)
through direct removal, filling, hydrological
interruption, or other means?
✓
d) Interfere substantially with the movement of
any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife
species or with established native resident or
migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use
of native wildlife nursery sites?
✓
e) Conflict with any local policies or
ordinances protecting biological resources,
such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance?
✓
f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted
Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community
Conservation Plan, or other approved local,
regional, or state habitat conservation plan?
✓
Sources: CVMSHCP; City of Cathedral City 2040 General Plan; City of Cathedral City General Plan Update DEIR, 2019; Project materials; Biological Resources Assessment, Jurisdictional Delineation and CVMSHP Consistency Analysis for the Date Palm Apartment Complex, City of Cathedral City, prepared by Jennings Environmental, August 2023 (Appendix B); Google Earth Pro.
Environmental Setting
The Project Site falls within the boundaries of the Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan, however, the Site is not located within a Conservation Area. Every Project completed within the boundaries of the CVMSHCP is required to pay a Development Impact Fee to the City or County, depending on location, prior to obtaining permits.
The Project is generally located on the western edge of Section 15, Township 4 South, Range 5 East, and is depicted on the Cathedral City U.S. Geological Survey’s (USGS) 7.5-minute topographic map. A literature review on the soil type determined the Project Site contains only one soil type:
• Myoma fine sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes (MaB). This soil is somewhat excessively drained with a high to very high capacity to transmit water. This soil consists of wind blown sandy alluvium, The Wren Multiple-Family Development Project Initial Study 37 October 2024
typically ranges in elevations around -200 to 1,800 feet above mean sea level (amsl), and is considered prime farmland if irrigated.
Discussion of Impacts
a) Less Than Significant Impact. A Project specific biological resource assessment was conducted (Appendix B). The assessment included a review of multiple state and federal databases, and a site survey. The biologist determined that the site is dominated by Creosote bush scrub, typical of the valley floor.
According to the literature search conducted as part of the biological resources study in Appendix B, 25 sensitive species including 4 listed species and 1 sensitive habitat, have been documented in the Cathedral City quad. The biologist found that 22 of these species had no potential to occur on the Project Site because the Project Site lacked habitat for these species.The field survey conducted as part of the survey for Appendix B focused on three species that have the potential to occur on vacant lands in the region as follows:
Desert Tortoise (Gopherus agassizii): The desert tortoise is a State and federally listed threatened species.
Result: No suitable habitat for desert tortoises exists within the Project Site or surrounding area. There are no documented desert tortoise occurrences within the Project Site or the surrounding area, therefore, this species is not expected to occur within the Project area or on the Project Site. Additionally, the Project Site is outside of the Designated Critical Habitat for this species. Therefore, no potential direct or indirect impacts on desert tortoise have be identified, and presence/absence surveys for this species are not warranted or recommended.
Burrowing owl (BUOW) (Athene cunicularia). The BUOW is a state and federal SSC.
Result: Based on the August 2023 field survey, the site does not contain suitable habitat for this species. No burrowing owls were observed during the site visit. No burrows of any kind were located within the Project Site. No portion of the Project Site showed any evidence of past or present BUOW activity. No feathers, whitewash, or castings were found and no suitable burrow surrogate species are present onsite. Therefore, no suitable habitat exists on-site and no focused surveys are required. Please also see subsection d.
Coachella Valley Fringe-toed Lizard (Uma inornata). The Coachella Valley fringe-toed lizard is listed as threatened by the USFWS and endangered by the CDFW.
Result: The sand sheets and sand dunes preferred by the Coachella Valley fringe-toed lizard do not exist on site. Therefore, there is no suitable habitat for this species and this species is considered absent from the site.
Therefore, the Project would not have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service because none exist on the Project Site. Impacts would be less than significant.
General Plan Amendment Analysis: A commercial project constructed on the Project Site would disturb the same area. Therefore, less than significant impacts to special status species would result from the approval of a GPA to convert the property from commercial to residential uses.
The Wren Multiple-Family Development Project Initial Study 38 October 2024
b) No Impact. The habitat on-site consists of sparse vegetation and bare ground. The study in Appendix B contains a list of all plants found on-site. The site is relatively undisturbed with the exception of the dirt roads that transect the property. There was also evidence of human disturbance in the form of foot traffic and bicycle traffic. Vegetation on the site consists of Creosote bush scrub, which is typical of the valley floor, and is not identified as a sensitive habitat in the CVMSHCP.
Based on a review of databases, aerial imagery, and a field survey, there were no riparian vegetation or hydric soils identified on the property, and no evidence of any drainage or jurisdictional feature on the Project Site.
Therefore, the Project would not have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service because no such habitat or other sensitive community exists on the Project Site. There would be no impact.
General Plan Amendment Analysis: A commercial project constructed on the Project Site would disturb the same area. Therefore, no impacts to riparian areas or policies relating to these habitats would occur from the approval of a GPA to convert the property from commercial to residential uses.
c) No Impact. See response to b) above.
General Plan Amendment Analysis: See response to b) above d) Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. While the Proposed Project exists as a vacant lot, it is bounded by urbanized uses and does not exist as a linear feature that provides habitat linkage to other undisturbed habitat. Therefore, the Project Site is not considered a wildlife corridor or a portion of a corridor.
However, the existing vegetation on the property could have the potential to provide nesting opportunities for birds covered under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA). As the subject site is vacant, these species would reside seasonally within the subject site. Nesting activities would occur between March and August of any year. Under the provisions of the MBTA, impacts to covered nesting birds would be considered a significant impact.
In addition, Fish and Game Code sections 3503, 3503.5, and 3513 afford protective measures under Section 3503, which states that it is unlawful to take, possess, or needlessly destroy the nest or eggs of any bird, except as otherwise provided by Fish and Game Code or any regulation made pursuant thereto. Fish and Game Code Section 3503.5 makes it unlawful to take, possess, or destroy any birds-of-prey or to take, possess, or destroy the nest or eggs of any such bird except as otherwise provided by Fish and Game Code or any regulation adopted pursuant thereto. Fish and Game Code Section 3513 makes it unlawful to take or possess any migratory nongame bird except as provided by rules and regulations adopted by the Secretary of the Interior under provisions of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act of 1918, as amended (16 U.S.C. § 703 et seq.).
The Wren Multiple-Family Development Project Initial Study 39 October 2024
Due to the relatively undisturbed nature of the site, and the vegetation available for nesting, development of the Project could result in impacts to nesting birds. In order to reduce this impact to less than significant levels, Mitigation Measure BIO-1 is incorporated to ensure that any grading activities do not interfere with nesting birds.
General Plan Amendment Analysis: A commercial project constructed on the Project Site would also have a less than significant impact with mitigation incorporated because a commercial project would disturb the same area. Therefore, with mitigation incorporated, there is a less than significant impact to the approval of a GPA to convert the property from commercial to residential uses.
e) Less Than Significant. The subject property does not contain any biological resources that are protected by a local policy or ordinance, such as a tree preservation ordinance. Therefore, the Project would not conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance because no resources are on site that would be protected by a local policy.
General Plan Amendment Analysis: A commercial project constructed on the Project Site would also have a less than significant impact because it would disturb the same area. Therefore, a less than significant impact to the approval of a GPA would occur. f) Less Than Significant. As part of the CVMSHCP all participating Cities and the County of Riverside are required to implement a Local Development Mitigation Fee (LDMF) on new development within the plan area. The proposed Project, being within an area that is subject to the CVMSHCP, will be required to pay the Local Development Mitigation Fee, The City would assess this fee as a routine fee prior to issuance of grading permits. With payment of the required LDMF fee and adherence to CVMSHCP, impacts will be less than significant. Therefore, the Project would not conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan. Impacts would be less than significant.
General Plan Amendment Analysis: A commercial project constructed on the Project Site would also have a less than significant impact because it would occur on the same site and disturb the same amount of land. Therefore, a less than significant impact to the approval of a GPA would result.
Measures:
BIO-1: Nesting bird nesting season generally extends from February 1 through September 15 in southern California and specifically, March 15 through August 31 for migratory passerine birds. To avoid impacts to nesting birds (common and special status) during the nesting season, a qualified Avian Biologist will conduct pre-construction Nesting Bird Surveys (NBS) no more than 3-days prior to Project-related disturbance to nestable vegetation to identify any active nests. If no active nests are found, no further action will be required. If an active nest is found, the biologist will set appropriate no-work buffers around the nest which will be based upon the nesting species, its sensitivity to disturbance, nesting stage, and expected types, intensity, and duration of the disturbance. The nests and buffer zones shall be field-checked weekly by a qualified biological monitor. The approved no-work buffer zone shall be clearly marked in the The Wren Multiple-Family Development Project Initial Study 40 October 2024
field, within which no disturbance activity shall commence until the qualified biologist has determined the young birds have successfully fledged and the nest is inactive.
Mitigation Monitoring:
BIO-A: If the initial site grating occurs between March 15 and September 15, provide written evidence to the City’s Building Department that a pre-construction nesting bird survey has occurred within three days prior to issuance of the grading permit.
Responsible Parties: Project applicant, project biologist, Planning Department, City Engineer.
The Wren Multiple-Family Development Project Initial Study 41 October 2024
V. CULTURAL RESOURCES
Would the Project:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the
significance of a historical resource pursuant to
§ 15064.5?
✓
b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the
significance of an archaeological resource
pursuant to § 15064.5?
✓
c) Disturb any human remains, including those
interred outside of formal cemeteries? ✓
Sources: City of Cathedral City 2040 General Plan; City of Cathedral City General Plan Update DEIR, 2019; Project materials; Google Earth Pro; Historical/Archaeological Resources Survey Report, Assessor’s Parcel Nos. 670-110-043, -045, -048 to - 053, -055, and -056, prepared by CRM Tech., October 24, 2023 (Appendix C).
Environmental Setting
The City of Cathedral City lies in the northwestern portion of the Coachella Valley, a northwest-southeast trending desert valley that constitutes the westernmost part of the Colorado Desert. Dictated by this geographic setting, the climate and environment of the study area and its surrounding region are typical of southern California’s desert country, marked by extremes in temperature and aridity. Temperatures in the region reach over 120 degrees in summer, and dip to near freezing in winter. Average annual precipitation is less than five inches, and the average annual evaporation rate exceeds three feet.
The Project Site is situated in a suburban setting in the northern portion of Cathedral City, near the Interstate Highway 10 corridor. It is surrounded mostly by residential neighborhoods of relatively recent vintages to the east and the south, a community church to the north, and vacant land across Date Palm Drive to the west. The terrain is generally level, with elevations ranging around 370 feet above mean sea level. The surface soil is composed of a light olive gray very fine sand.
A Cultural Resource Investigation (Appendix C) was performed for the Project Site to determine if the Proposed Project would potentially impact cultural resources. Historical sources consulted for the study suggest that the study area is relatively low in sensitivity for cultural resources from the historic period.
Prior to the 1950s, no human-made features were known to exist in the immediate vicinity of the study area. By the mid-1950s, amid the post-WWII boom, a grid of roads was laid out immediately to the south of the Project location, including the forerunner of today’s McCallum Way, although no further development had occurred as of 1959 (Appendix C).
The segment of Date Palm Drive adjacent to the western Project boundary was built between 1959 and 1972, and the residential neighborhoods surrounding the Project location gradually came into being during the 1970s-1990s (Appendix C). In 1996, a westerly extension of what is now Rosemount Road in the adjacent neighborhood to the east, likely a temporary construction access road, became the first humanmade feature to appear within the Project boundaries, but it was abandoned over the next few years, after the completion of that neighborhood (Appendix C).
The Cultural Resource Investigation also included a request for information from the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) regarding sacred lands. The nearby Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians was also contacted by electronic mail for additional information on potential Native American cultural resources in the Project vicinity and to invite tribal participation in the upcoming archaeological The Wren Multiple-Family Development Project Initial Study 42 October 2024
fieldwork. Claritsa Duarte, Cultural Resources Analyst with the Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians (ACBCI) Historic Preservation Office, requested to review copies of all applicable cultural resource documentation, along with the presence of an approved Agua Caliente cultural resources monitor during any ground-disturbing activities.
In February 2023, the City of Cathedral City sent a letter to the ACBCI offering them an opportunity to comment, in accordance with Assembly Bill 52 (AB52) and Senate Bill 18 (SB18). The tribe responded that the Project is within the ACBCI’s traditional use area and requested tribal monitoring during ground disturbing activities. Please also see Section XVIII, Tribal Cultural Resources.
Discussion of Impacts
a) No Impact. The Cultural Resource Investigation report prepared for the Project identified that there are no historical resources pursuant to California Code of Regulations, Section 15064.5 on the Project Site. There would be no impact.
General Plan Amendment Analysis: A commercial project constructed on the Project Site would also have no impact because is the area disturbed would be the same for both a commercial project and a residential project. Therefore, no impact would occur. b) Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated. The Cultural Resources Investigation did not identify any archaeological sites on the Project Site or in the vicinity, and identified a low potential that previously undiscovered archaeological resources may exist within the Project Site which may be exposed during the Project’s ground-disturbing construction activities. However, to accommodate for unanticipated resources, Mitigation Measures CUL-1, which requires archaeological monitoring and disposition requirements, shall be implemented to reduce impacts related to unanticipated historical and archaeological resources to a less than significant level.
Impacts would be less than significant with mitigation incorporated.
General Plan Amendment Analysis: A commercial project constructed on the Project Site would also have a less than significant impact with mitigation incorporated because the area disturbed would be the same for both a commercial project and a residential project. Therefore, with mitigation incorporated, there is a less than significant impact to the approval of a GPA to convert the property from commercial to residential uses.
c) Less Than Significant. Based on an analysis of records and archaeological survey of the property, it has been determined that the Project Site does not include a formal cemetery or any archaeological resources that might contain interred human remains. Nonetheless, the Project will be required to adhere to State Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 in the event that human remains are encountered. This requirement of law ensures that no further disturbance occur until the County Coroner has made the necessary findings as to the origin of the remains. Furthermore, pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097.98 (b), remains shall be left in place and free from disturbance until a final decision as to the treatment and their disposition has been made.
Compliance with State Law is not considered mitigation. Therefore, impacts in this regard are considered less than significant.
The Wren Multiple-Family Development Project Initial Study 43 October 2024
General Plan Amendment Analysis: A commercial project constructed on the Project Site would also have a less than significant impact because the area disturbed would be the same for both a commercial project and a residential project. Therefore, a less than significant impact to the approval of a GPA would occur.
Mitigation Measures:
CUL-1: An approved Agua Caliente Native American Cultural Resource Monitor(s) shall be on-site during any ground disturbing activities (including grubbing, grading and excavation). Should buried cultural deposits be encountered, the Monitor may request that destructive construction halt. The Monitor shall notify a Qualified Archaeologist (Secretary of the Interior’s Standards and Guidelines) to investigate and, if necessary, prepare a mitigation plan for submission to the State Historic Preservation Officer and the Agua Caliente Tribal Historic Preservation Office.
Monitoring:
CUL-A Prior to issuance of grading permits, demonstrate contract with ACBCI for archaeological monitoring. Within 30 days following completion of monitoring, a report of findings will be provided to the City.
Responsible Parties: Project applicant, Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians, Planning Department, City Engineer
The Wren Multiple-Family Development Project Initial Study 44 October 2024
VI. ENERGY
Would the Project:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a) Result in potentially significant
environmental impact due to wasteful,
inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of
energy resources, during project construction
or operation?
✓
b) Conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan
for renewable energy or energy efficiency? ✓
Sources: Date Palm Apartments Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Study, Prepared by MD Acoustics, June 18, 2024 (Appendix A).
Environmental Setting
Primary energy sources include fossil fuels (oil, coal and natural gas), nuclear, and renewable sources such as wind, solar, geothermal, and hydropower. In addition to utility-provided electrical power, many homes and business are installing rooftop solar and storage, and new construction and renovation is required to conform to the state’s strict green building code, which further serves to ensure that energy resources are used economically and wisely. Both the regulatory environment and the economy have moved aggressively toward greater energy efficiency and reliance on non-polluting renewables sources.
Electricity - The Project Site is located within the electric power service boundaries of Southern California Edison (SCE). SCE is the largest subsidiary of Edison International and is the primary electricity supply company for much of Southern California. It provides 15 million people with electricity across a service territory of approximately 50,000 square miles. As of June 2020, almost half of the electricity delivered across its vast service territory came from carbon-free sources. SCE’s power mix is comprised of 34 percent from solar, geothermal, small hydro (less than 30 megawatts), biomass and biowaste; 14 percent from nuclear and large hydro (30-plus MW); and 52 percent still comes from polluting natural gas and other sources.
Natural Gas - Natural gas services in the Project area are provided by Southern California Gas Company (SoCalGas). Natural gas supplies are transported from Texas to the Coachella Valley through three eastwest trending gas lines, which cross the valley near and parallel to Interstate-10 and continue west to Los Angeles. The pipelines include one 30-inch line and two 24-inch lines, with pressures of 2,000 pounds per square inch (psi). At this time, it is not known whether lower pressure distribution lines extend to the Project vicinity.
Alternative Energy – SCE continues to meet or exceed California’s Renewable Portfolio Standard primarily with local resources. As noted above, in 2020 SCE’s power mix included 34 percent renewable sources. There is also large-scale wind power production in the Coachella Valley. There are no utilityscale renewable energy facilities in the Project area. It should be noted that SoCalGas is developing “green” sources of natural gas that may reduce GHG and other emissions associated with its use.
Cathedral City Climate Action Plan - Cathedral City’s Climate Action Plan promotes solar technology.
The Project will comply with the solar and zero net energy requirements of the current 2022 California Building Code.
The Wren Multiple-Family Development Project Initial Study 45 October 2024
Discussion of Impacts
a, b) Less Than Significant Impact. The Project will not result in potentially significant environmental impacts due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources, during Project construction or operation, according to the air quality and greenhouse gas analysis in Appendix A. Information from the CalEEMod 2022.1.1.20 Daily and Annual Outputs contained in the air quality and greenhouse gas analyses (Appendix A) was utilized to determine the potential energy demand. The CalEEMod outputs detail Project related construction equipment, transportation energy demands, and facility energy demands.
Construction
The Project’s estimated energy consumption during construction is provided in Tables 15-21 in Appendix A. In summary, the usage was estimated as follows:
• Table 15: Project Construction Power Cost and Electricity Usage: 228,283 kWh. • Table 16: Construction Equipment Fuel Consumption Estimates: 46,135 gallons of diesel fuel.
• Table 17: Construction Worker Fuel Consumption Estimates: 33,195 gallons. • Table 18: Construction Vendor Fuel Consumption Estimates (Medium Heavy Duty Trucks): 11,637 gallons.
• Table 19: Construction Hauling Fuel Consumption Estimates (Heavy Heavy Duty Trucks):
0 gallons (No construction from heavy-heavy trucks are anticipated).
Construction of the Proposed Project would require the typical use of energy resources such as electricity for power tools and fuel for vehicles as described above. There are no unusual Project characteristics or construction processes that would require the use of equipment that would be more energy intensive than is used for comparable activities, nor would there be use of equipment that would not conform to current emissions standards (and related fuel efficiencies). Project construction is required to comply with applicable California Air Resources Board (CARB) regulations regarding retrofitting, repowering, or replacement of diesel off-road construction equipment. Additionally, CARB has adopted the Airborne Toxic Control Measure to limit heavyduty diesel motor vehicle idling in order to reduce public exposure to diesel particulate matter and other Toxic Air Contaminants. Compliance with these measures would result in a more efficient use of construction- related energy and would minimize or eliminate wasteful or unnecessary consumption of energy. Idling restrictions and the use of newer engines and equipment would result in less fuel combustion and energy consumption.
Additionally, as required by California Code of Regulations Title 13, Motor Vehicles, Section 2449(d)(3) Idling, limits idling times of construction vehicles to no more than five minutes, thereby minimizing or eliminating unnecessary and wasteful consumption of fuel due to unproductive idling of construction equipment. Enforcement of idling limitations is realized through periodic site inspections conducted by City building officials, and/or in response to citizen complaints.
Therefore, Project compliance with State regulations will reduce impacts to less than significant and no mitigation is required.
The Wren Multiple-Family Development Project Initial Study 46 October 2024
Operations
Energy consumption in support of or related to Project operations would include transportation energy demands (energy consumed by employee and patron vehicles accessing the Project Site) and facilities energy demands (energy consumed by building operations and site maintenance activities).
To model the Proposed Project’s energy usage, the vehicle fleet mix was used as determined in the CalEEMod output from the air quality and greenhouse gas analysis (Appendix A). The Proposed Project was modeled to generate approximately 15,512 daily vehicle trips as a worst case scenario and includes both trucks and automobiles (Appendix A). Table 20 in Appendix A shows that an estimated 227,488 gallons of fuel would be consumed per year for the operation of the Proposed Project. The State of California consumed approximately 4.2 billion gallons of diesel and 15.1 billion gallons of gasoline in 2015. Therefore, the increase in fuel consumption from the Proposed Project is insignificant in comparison to the State’s demand. Therefore, Project transportation energy consumption would not be considered inefficient, wasteful, or otherwise unnecessary.
Table 21 in Appendix A identifies that the Project’s annual operational energy demand according to the CalEEMod 2020.4.0 model annual output would be as follows:
• Natural Gas – 2,630,134 kBTU/year
• Electricity – 1,591,276 kWh/year
In 2022, the non-residential sector of the County of Riverside consumed approximately 9,06 million kWh of electricity. In addition, the estimated natural gas consumption for the proposed Project is approximately 2.63 million kBTU per year. In 2022, the non-residential sector of Riverside County consumed approximately 284 million therms of gas. Therefore, the increase in both electricity and natural gas demand from the proposed Project is insignificant compared to the County’s 2022 demand.
Energy use in buildings is divided into energy consumed by the built environment and energy consumed by uses that are independent of the construction of the building such as in plug-in appliances. In California, the California Building Standards Code Title 24 governs energy consumed by the built environment, mechanical systems, and some types of fixed lighting. Nonbuilding energy use, or “plug-in” energy use can be further subdivided by specific end-use (refrigeration, cooking, appliances, etc.). The Proposed Project is required to comply with Title 24 standards, which require that new buildings reduce water consumption, employ building commissioning to increase building system efficiencies, divert construction waste from landfills, and install low pollutant-emitting finish materials.
The Project would also comply with the CALGreen Code as it:
• Provides outdoor secure bicycle facilities.
• Allows for electric vehicle charging in garages.
• Provide solar panels on parking canopies
The Wren Multiple-Family Development Project Initial Study 47 October 2024
The Site’s current land use classification is GC (General Commercial) within the City’s General Plan.
The Project therefore would not cause or result in the need for additional energy producing or transmission facilities. The Project would not engage in wasteful or inefficient uses of energy and aims to achieve energy conservations goals within the State of California particularly because the Project has been designed in compliance with California’s Energy Efficiency Standards and 2019 CALGreen Standards. Therefore, there is a less than significant impact, and no mitigation is required.
General Plan Amendment Analysis: To more specifically determine if changing the land use categories would cause greater or less impacts for this criterion, energy usage modeling would generally be performed based on specific project parameters of each of the project types. The Project Site is currently zoned PCC, which broadly includes retail, fast food, hotel, and numerous other commercial uses. In general, some commercial land use can be more intensive in terms of energy usage than others. The project identified for the Project Site in the 2007 IS/MND was a concept only, and no energy study was conducted. That project was never entitled. It would not be relevant to calculate the energy usage from the 2007 concept project or create some hypothetical project just for the purposes of calculating energy usage for comparison against the Proposed Project because, based on the analysis above, the Proposed Project would not violate energy policies and would not use excessive amounts of electricity. Any project, commercial or residential, is required to follow the CalGreen code which is designed to reduce energy usage.
Therefore, there is a less than significant impact to the approval of a GPA to convert the property from commercial to residential use.
Mitigation Measures:
None required.
Monitoring:
None required.
The Wren Multiple-Family Development Project Initial Study 48 October 2024
VII. GEOLOGY AND SOILS
Would the Project:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a) Directly or indirectly cause potential
substantial adverse effects, including the risk
of loss, injury, or death involving:
✓
i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as
delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo
Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the
State Geologist for the area or based on other
substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer
to Division of Mines and Geology Special
Publication 42.
✓
ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? ✓
iii) Seismic related ground failure, including
liquefaction? ✓
iv) Landslides? ✓
b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss
of topsoil? ✓
c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is
unstable, or that would become unstable as a
result of the Project, and potentially result in
on-or off-site landslide, lateral spreading,
subsidence, liquefaction or collapse?
✓
d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in
Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code
(1994), creating substantial direct or indirect
risks to life or property?
✓
e) Have soils incapable of adequately
supporting the use of septic tanks or
alternative wastewater disposal systems
where sewers are not available for the
disposal of wastewater?
✓
f) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique
paleontological resource or site or unique
geologic feature?
✓
Sources: City of Cathedral City 2040 General Plan; City of Cathedral City General Plan Update DEIR, 2019; Project materials; Geotechnical Report for Living Care Assisted Living, APN 670-110-043, prepared by LandMark Consultants, June 15, 2023 (Appendix D-1); Paleontological Resources Assessment Report, Assessor’s Parcel Nos. 670-110-043, -045, -048 to -053, -055, and -056, prepared by CRM Tech, October 24, 2023 (Appendix D-2).
Environmental Setting
The City of Cathedral City is located in the Coachella Valley which lies in the Colorado Desert Geomorphic Province. This province consists of a low-lying barren desert basin, about 245 feet below sea level at its southern extremity, and is dominated by the Salton Sea. The province is a depressed block between active branches of the alluvium-covered San Andreas Fault with the southern extension of the The Wren Multiple-Family Development Project Initial Study 49 October 2024
Mojave Desert on the east. It is characterized by the ancient beach lines and silt deposits of Ancient Lake Cahuilla.6
A geotechnical investigation was prepared for the Project Site parcel to evaluate the potential for geological impacts as a result of the Proposed Project (Appendix D-1).
Discussion of Impacts
The construction of either a residential or a commercial project on the Project site would be subject to the same standards, regardless of use, relating to geologic and soil hazards. Therefore, approval of the GPA will result in equivalent impacts as those discussed below. a.i, a.ii) Less Than Significant Impact. The Project Site is in Southern California, a seismically active area susceptible to the effects of seismic activity including rupture of earthquake faults. The proposed development site lies outside of any Alquist Priolo Special Studies Zone (California Dept of Conservation, Earthquake Zones of Required Investigation GIS map). The geotechnical investigation in Appendix D-1 identified that the nearest mapped earthquake fault zone is the San Andreas – San Bernardino (south) fault, located approximately 3.7 miles northeast of the Project Site. The Proposed Project is required to be constructed consistent with all applicable seismic design standards contained in the California Building Code (CBC) in effect at the time of construction, including Section 1613 ‐ Earthquake Loads, which would reduce risks associated with seismic activity. Therefore, potential impacts associated with adverse effects to people or structures from strong seismic ground shaking would be less than significant and no mitigation would be required.
a.iii) Less Than Significant Impact. Liquefaction is the loss of topsoil strength from sudden shock (usually earthquake shaking), causing the soil to become a fluid mass. In general, for the effects of liquefaction to be manifested at the surface, groundwater levels must be within 50 feet of the ground surface and soils within the saturated zone must also be susceptible to liquefaction. The Proposed Project Site, as with most of the City, lies within a “moderate” potential for liquefaction, as identified by Riverside County geological maps7. The geotechnical study for the Proposed Project identified that the potential for liquefaction to occur on this site would be considered negligible because of the depth of groundwater beneath the site is anticipated to occur at approximately 230 feet below ground surface, based on data from nearby wells. Furthermore, no free groundwater was encountered in exploratory borings performed at a depth of 51.5 feet, as part of the geotechnical study. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. a.iv) Less Than Significant Impact. The geotechnical study in Appendix D-1 identified that landslides are unlikely due to the regional planar topography. No ancient landslides were identified in the region, and none were observed during the geotechnical study in Appendix D-1. The City’s General Plan EIR, Exhibit 2.8-1 also identified that the Project Site and the surrounding area have a low susceptibility of being impacted by rock falls and seismically induced landsliding. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.
6 City of Cathedral City Draft General Plan Environmental Impact Report (SCH #2018081012), July 15, 2019, prepared by Terra Nova.
7 Riverside County “Map My County,” https://gis1.countyofriverside.us/Html5Viewer/?viewer=MMC_Public, accessed June 8, 2024.
The Wren Multiple-Family Development Project Initial Study 50 October 2024
b) Less Than Significant Impact. During Project construction when soils are exposed, temporary soil erosion may occur, which could be exacerbated by rainfall and wind. To control the potential for soil erosion, wind, dust, and water quality impacts, the Proposed Project is required to comply with SCAQMD rules relating to dust control (such as SCAQMD Rule 403) and rules to protect water quality including preparing a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) to be approved by the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB). Additionally, because Project construction would disturb more than one (1) acre of soil, the Project is required to obtain coverage under the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) General Permit for Discharges of Stormwater Runoff Associated with Construction Activity (General Construction Permit, or CGP).
The General Construction Permit is part of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program established to protect and enhance water quality. The City is a co-permittee with Riverside County for NPDES compliance, and will require compliance with this permit through both construction and operation of the Project. Compliance will include a Water Quality Management Plan, which will provide best management practices (BMPs) for long term sediment control. Compliance with Federal, State, and Local regulations will ensure potential impacts are less than significant.
c, d) Less Than Significant Impact. The geotechnical investigation identified that subsurface soils primarily consist of medium dense to dense sands, and the near surface soils are non-expansive in nature. Therefore, they would not become unstable as a result of the Project. As discussed in a(i) through a(iv) above, the Project Site is not subject to landslides, lateral spreading, liquefaction or collapse.
The Project Site is located in the Coachella Valley, which has experienced up to 12 inches of regional subsidence between 1996 and 2005 (Appendix D-1). The geotechnical investigation identified that the risk of regional subsidence at the Project Site is considered low. The City’s General Plan, Safety Element, identifies that the regional groundwater managers have been proactive in securing and importing water to recharge the aquifer, which would assist in mitigating the overdraft conditions that contribute to regional subsidence.
The Proposed Project would be constructed in accordance with the recommendations made in the Geotechnical Investigation that would ensure the Project would meet all engineering standards that minimize and avoid the Project’s potential to be susceptible to lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse. Therefore, potential impacts associated with on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse would be less than significant. e) No Impact. The Project would not require the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems or result in impacts related to the ability of soils to support septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems. The Project will construct a main sewer line in Rosemount Road from the Project’s driveway to connect to existing sanitary sewer lines located at the intersection of Rosemount Road and Stella Place. No impacts would occur because the Project does not require the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems, and no mitigation measures would be required.
f) Less Than Significant Impact. Paleontological resources are the fossilized remains of organisms that lived in a region in the geologic past and whose remains are found in the accompanying geologic strata. This type of fossil record represents the primary source of information on ancient life forms, most of which are now extinct. The Proposed Project Site has no known unique paleontological features (rivers, lakes, hills, faults, folds, etc.) located onsite that would directly or The Wren Multiple-Family Development Project Initial Study 51 October 2024
indirectly be destroyed by the proposed Project. The paleontological investigation in Appendix D2 identified that the geologic units underlying this Project Site are mapped primarily as Holocene aged deposits of alluvial sand and gravel. Holocene alluvial units are considered to be of high preservation value, but material found is unlikely to be fossil material due to the relatively modern associated dates of the deposits. There have been no fossil localities identified within the Project area or within a 1 mile radius.
While the presence of any fossil material is unlikely, if excavation activity disturbs deeper sediment dating to the earliest parts of the Holocene or Late Pleistocene periods, the material could be scientifically significant. Excavation activity associated with the development of the Project area is unlikely to be paleontologically sensitive because the Project Site is situated entirely upon deposits of Holocene-age sediments, which have a low potential to contain significant, nonrenewable paleontological resources and no paleontological localities were previously identified in the study area. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.
Mitigation Measures:
None required.
Monitoring:
None required.
The Wren Multiple-Family Development Project Initial Study 52 October 2024
VIII. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS
Would the Project:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either
directly or indirectly, that may have a
significant impact on the environment?
✓
b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or
regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing
the emissions of greenhouse gases?
✓
Sources: City of Cathedral City 2040 General Plan; City of Cathedral City General Plan Update DEIR, 2019; Date Palm Apartments Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Study, Prepared by MD Acoustics, June 18, 2024 (Appendix A).
Environmental Setting
Global Climate Change (GCC) refers to the change in average meteorological conditions on the earth with respect to temperature, wind patterns, precipitation, and storms. Global temperatures are regulated by naturally occurring atmospheric gases such as water vapor, CO2, N2O, CH4, hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulfur hexafluoride (SF6). These particular gases are important due to their residence time (duration they stay) in the atmosphere, which ranges from 10 years to more than 100 years.
These gases allow solar radiation into the earth’s atmosphere, but prevent radioactive heat from escaping, thus warming the earth’s atmosphere. GCC can occur naturally as it has in the past with the previous ice ages.
Gases that trap heat in the atmosphere are often referred to as Greenhouse Gases (GHGs). GHGs are released into the atmosphere by both natural and anthropogenic activity. Without the natural GHG effect, the earth’s average temperature would be approximately 61 degrees Fahrenheit (°F) cooler than it is currently. The cumulative accumulation of these gases in the earth’s atmosphere is considered to be the cause for the observed increase in the earth’s temperature.
There are numerous Federal, State and local plans that outline how to reduce GHG emissions. These are detailed in Appendix A.
a) Less Than Significant Impact. A greenhouse gas assessment was prepared for the proposed Project and determined that the Project cannot generate enough GHG emissions to affect a discernible change in global climate. However, the proposed Project may participate in the potential for GCC by its incremental contribution of GHGs combined with the cumulative increase of all other sources of GHGs, which when taken together constitute potential influences on GCC.
Because these changes may have serious environmental consequences, the study evaluated the potential for the proposed Project to have a significant effect upon the environment as a result of its potential contribution to the greenhouse effect.
The estimated GHG emissions for the proposed Project land use are summarized from the evaluation in Appendix A in Table 5: Opening Year Unmitigated Project-Related Greenhouse Gas Emissions. The estimated GHG emissions include emissions from Carbon Dioxide (CO2), Methane (CH4), and Nitrous Oxide (N20). Total GHG emissions during construction (967.45 MTCO2e/yr), are amortized over 30 years, as allowed by SCAQMD methodology. As shown, the proposed Project would generate a total of approximately 2,022.86 MTCO2e/yr., which would not exceed the SCAQMD’s screening threshold of 3,000 MTCO2e/yr.
The Wren Multiple-Family Development Project Initial Study 53 October 2024
Table 5: Opening Year Unmitigated Project-Related Greenhouse Gas Emissions Category
Greenhouse Gas Emissions(Metric Tons/Year)1
Bio-CO2 NonBio-CO2 CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Area Sources2 0.00 3.65 3.65 0.00 0.00 3.66
Energy Usage3 0.00 523.54 523.54 0.04 0.00 525.38
Mobile Sources4 0.00 1,368.20 1,368.20 0.06 0.07 1,393.00 Solid Waste5 13.46 0.00 13.46 1.35 0.00 47.10
Water6 2.63 10.14 12.77 0.27 0.01 21.47
Construction7 0.00 31.82 31.82 0.00 0.00 32.25
Total Emissions 16.09 1,937.35 1,953.45 1.72 0.08 2,022.86 County of Riverside CAP and SCAQMD Draft Screening Threshold 3,000 Exceeds Threshold? No
Notes:
1 Source: CalEEMod Version 2022.1.1.19 2 Area sources consist of GHG emissions from consumer products, architectural coatings, and landscape equipment. 3 Energy usage consist of GHG emissions from electricity and natural gas usage. 4 Mobile sources consist of GHG emissions from vehicles. 5 Solid waste includes the CO2 and CH4 emissions created from the solid waste placed in landfills. 6 Water includes GHG emissions from electricity used for transport of water and processing of wastewater. 7 Construction GHG emissions based on a 30 year amortization rate.
Therefore, the Proposed Project would not generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment. The impact would be less than significant.
General Plan Amendment Analysis: Construction and operation of a commercial use would also generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment. As described in Section III., Air Quality, a commercial project would generate substantially higher vehicle trips than the proposed Project. It would therefore also hold that mobile source emissions of GHGs would be higher than those shown in Table 5 for the proposed Project.
Therefore, the proposed GPA will reduce GHG emissions when compared to the proposed Project, and its impacts will be less than significant.
b) Less Than Significant Impact.
Connect SoCal 2024 Consistency
The proposed Project is located within the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), which has authority to develop the SCS or APS. For the SCAG region, the targets set by CARB are at eight percent below 2005 per capita GHG emissions levels by 2020 and 13 percent below 2005 per capita GHG emissions levels by 2035. In April 2024, SCAG adopted the 2024– 2050 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (Connect SoCal 2024)., which meets the CARB emission reduction requirements. Connect SoCal 2024 carries forward policy direction established in Connect SoCal 2020, as well as more recent Regional Council actions that address emerging issues facing the region. Connect SoCal is an important planning The Wren Multiple-Family Development Project Initial Study 54 October 2024
document for the region, allowing public agencies to implement transportation projects in a coordinated manner while qualifying for federal and state funding. Connect SoCal also supports local jurisdictions in making informed land use planning and housing development decisions.
Connect SoCal 2024 outlines a vision for a more resilient and equitable future, with investment, policies and strategies for achieving the region’s shared goals through 2050. The Plan elements that are necessary to bring this vision to fruition are organized within the pillars of Mobility, Communities, Environment and Economy. Table 6: Project Consistency with Connect SoCal 2024 Goals identifies how the Project is consistent with Connect SoCal 2024.
Table 6: Project Consistency with Connect SoCal 2024 Goals Connect SoCal 2024 Goal Project Consistency
Mobility: Build and maintain an integrated multimodal
transportation network
• Support investments that are well-maintained and
operated, coordinated, resilient and result in
improved safety, improved air quality and minimized
greenhouse gas emissions
• Ensure that reliable, accessible, affordable and
appealing travel options are readily available, while
striving to enhance equity in the offerings in high-need communities
• Support planning for people of all ages, abilities and background
Consistent. The Proposed Project is a 204-unit apartment complex that is open to all age, abilities and backgrounds.
The Proposed Project is designed to meet all Federal, State, and local regulations to reduce air emissions and
greenhouse gases. The Proposed Project is situated in an area of the city where transit services are readily available.
The surrounding land use to the south and west is
commercial, therefore, residents would have access within
0.2 mile to shopping for basic goods and can choose a
pedestrian or bicycle option to obtain goods and services offered by the surrounding commercial. The Proposed
Project also proposes to complete Rosemount Road,
between the existing residential neighborhood to the east, and Date Palm Drive, which would not only provide the
Proposed Project’s residents access to a major city
thoroughfare, but also provide residents to the east with convenient access to Date Palm Drive. The Proposed
Project’s secondary access allows the Proposed Project’s residents two additional points to access Date Palm Drive and 30th Avenue which would alleviate traffic congestion at Date Palm Drive and Rosemount Road. The Proposed
Project is also constructing intersection improvements at Date Palm Drive and Rosemount Road that include a traffic signal to improve safety. Therefore, the Proposed Project meets the Mobility goal and subgoals of Connect SoCal2024 because it is designed build and maintain an integrated multimodal transportation network.
Communities: Develop, connect and sustain livable and
thriving communities
• Create human-centered communities in urban,
suburban and rural settings to increase mobility
options and reduce travel distances.
• Produce and preserve diverse housing types in an
effort to improve affordability, accessibility and
opportunities for all households
Consistent. The Proposed Project, termed “The Wren” is
designed to be an apartment community with attractive
floor plans and amenities, such as a swimming pool and an open turf recreational area to provide residents with a comfortable environment to live and work. The Proposed
Project’s location is near transit stops and within 0.2 mile of existing and planned commercial which increase mobility options for pedestrian and bicycle and reduces travel
distances for employment and services. Floor plans range from studio to three bedroom which provides for diverse housing to improve affordability, accessibility and
opportunities for all households. Therefore, the Proposed Project meets the Communities goal and subgoals of
The Wren Multiple-Family Development Project Initial Study 55 October 2024
Connect SoCal2024 because it is designed with features that connect sustain livable, thriving community.
Environment: Create a healthy region for the people of
today and tomorrow
• Develop communities that are resilient and can
mitigate, adapt to and respond to chronic and acute
stresses and disruptions, such as climate change
• Integrate the region’s development pattern and
transportation network to improve air quality, reduce
greenhouse gas emissions and enable more
sustainable use of energy and water
• Conserve the region’s resources
Consistent. The Proposed Project is designed in accordance with the CalGreen Code which seeks to reduce energy usage and reduce emissions that cause greenhouse gases. The
Proposed Project will be constructed in accordance with SCAQMD regulations to reduce emissions of criteria
pollutants that contribute to poor air quality and climate change. Each of the units would contain new appliances and water-saving fixtures to reduce impacts to water usage and sewer services. The Project will also construct Rosemount Road which will provide a direct, convenient access to Date Palm, a major city thoroughfare, not only for the Proposed Project’s residents but also for the residential community to the east of the Proposed Project. The intersection of Date Palm and Rosemount Road is also designed with a signal for added safety. The Proposed Project also provides a direct access to two other points of ingress and egress to the north of the Project Site, which would reduce congestion and
emissions from idling vehicles at the Date Palm Drive and Rosemount Road intersection. Therefore, the Proposed
Project meets the Environment goal and subgoals of
Connect SoCal2024 because it is designed and will be
constructed in compliance with all Federal, State, and local regulations that serve to reduce harmful emissions and
provide a more sustainable use of energy and water.
Economy: Support a sustainable, efficient and productive regional economic environment that provides
opportunities for all people in the region
• Improve access to jobs and educational resources
• Advance a resilient and efficient goods movement
system that supports the economic vitality of the
region, attainment of clean air and quality of life for our communities
Consistent. Once constructed, the Proposed Project would hire employees and contractors to operate and maintain
the complex, which provide additional jobs. The Project’s proposed roadway construction (as described above) also serves to improve access to jobs, educational services and goods movement between the Proposed Project’s residents and the city. Therefore, the Proposed Project meets the Economy goal and subgoals of Connect SoCal2024 because
the ingress and egress for the Project improves access to a major city thoroughfare which would provide an efficient goods movement system and improve access to jobs and
educational resources in the City.
City of Cathedral City CAP Consistency
As described above, a Climate Action Plan (CAP) was adopted by the City of Cathedral City in May of 2013. The City of Cathedral City Climate Action Plan was set in place to guide the City in decisions that lead to the largest and most cost-effective emissions reductions. This plan sets forth goals to reduce emissions to achieve the targets of AB 32. The Climate Action Plan identifies that the community will have to reach a 23.4% reduction from Year 2010 baseline emissions by the year 2020 in order to obtain the AB 32 target emissions. These CAP targets are based on a predicted population growth rate of 19 percent between 2010 and 2020. However, according to the Census Bureau, the population of Cathedral City was estimated to be 51,200 in April 2010 and 55,007 in July 2019; which shows a growth rate of only 7.4 percent.
The City of Cathedral City has identified 77 measures to be implemented over the course of an eight-year period, beginning in 2013, in order to achieve their emission reduction goals.
The Wren Multiple-Family Development Project Initial Study 56 October 2024
Table 7: City of Cathedral City CAP Applicable Measures Project Consistency identifies that the Project would be consistent with the City’s CAP.
Table 7: City of Cathedral City CAP Applicable Measures Project Consistency Sector CAP Measuresto
Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions Project Compliance with Measure Sphere - "Where We Live"
Solid Waste
Solid Waste Diversion: Increase solid waste
diversion rate to achieve an average annual
goal of 65% through 2020.
Consistent. The Project will be required to comply with AB 341 which includes recycling programs that reduces
waste to landfills by up to 75% by 2020.
Water
Landscaper Certification: Require all licensed
landscapers to be certified by CVAG
Consistent. Landscapers used during the Projectshall
be certified by CVAG.
Water
Gray water-Ready Ordinance: Require all new
residential development to be constructed for
easy implementation of gray water systems
that redirect water from wash basins,showers,
and tubs.
Consistent. The Projectshall be built gray water-ready, or consistent with City engineering direction.
Sphere - " How We Build"
Residential
Buildings
Shade Trees: Promote properly sited and
selected shade trees in 100% of new
construction to reduce heat islands and
provide shade to offset air conditioning
Consistent. The Project will comply with current 2022
Title 24 requirements to meet energy compliance.
Government
Initiatives
Green Building Program: Promote the
voluntary Green Building Program to prepare
for enhanced Title 24 requirements and green
building standards.
Consistent. The California Green Building Standards
Code (proposed Part 11, Title 24) was adopted as part
of the California Building Standards Code in the CCR.
Part 11 establishes voluntary standards, that became
mandatory in the 2010 edition of the Code, on
planning and design for sustainable site development,
energy efficiency (in excess of the California Energy
Code requirements), water conservation, material
conservation, and internal air contaminants. The
Proposed Project would be subject to these mandatory
standards. The 2014 Title 24 Code contained
regulations that would be 25% more efficient than the
2010 edition of the Code, and the 2016 Title 24 Code is 5% more efficient than the 2014 edition of the Code in
terms of nonresidential buildings. The 2022 Title 24
Code builds on the 2016 Code.
Notes:
a. Source: City of Cathedral City Climate Action Plan (2013).
Therefore, since the proposed Project is consistent with Connect SoCal 2024 and the City’s CAP, the Project would not conflict with any applicable plan, policy or regulation of an agency adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases. Impacts are considered to be less than significant.
The Wren Multiple-Family Development Project Initial Study 57 October 2024
General Plan Amendment Analysis: Construction and operation of a commercial use would be required to comply with all applicable plans, as with the Proposed Project. The Proposed Project was identified to have less than significant impacts. Therefore, there is a less than significant impact to the approval of a GPA to convert the property from commercial to residential uses.
Mitigation Measures:
None required.
Monitoring:
None required.
The Wren Multiple-Family Development Project Initial Study 58 October 2024
IX. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS
MATERIALS
Would the Project:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a) Create a significant hazard to the public or
the environment through the routine transport,
use, or disposal of hazardous materials?
✓
b) Create a significant hazard to the public or
the environment through reasonably
foreseeable upset and accident conditions
involving the release of hazardous materials
into the environment?
✓
c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle
hazardous or acutely hazardous materials,
substances, or waste within one-quarter mile
of an existing or proposed school?
✓
d) Be located on a site which is included on a
list of hazardous materials sites compiled
pursuant to Government Code Section
65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a
significant hazard to the public or the
environment?
✓
e) For a project located within an airport land
use plan or, where such a plan has not been
adopted, within two miles of a public airport
or public use airport, would the project result
in a safety hazard or excessive noise for people
residing or working in the project area?
✓
f) Impair implementation of or physically
interfere with an adopted emergency response
plan or emergency evacuation plan?
✓
g) Expose people or structures, either directly
or indirectly, to a significant risk of loss, injury
or death involving wildland fires?
✓
Sources: Project materials; Google Earth Pro.
Environmental Setting
The proper management of hazardous materials is a common concern for all communities within the Coachella Valley. Beginning in the 1970s, governments at the federal, state, and local levels became increasingly concerned about the effects of hazardous materials on human health and the environment.
Numerous laws and regulations were developed to investigate and mitigate these effects. As a result, the storage, use, generation, transport, and disposal of hazardous materials are highly regulated by federal, state, and local laws and regulations.
Discussion of Impacts
a), b) Less Than Significant Impact. Construction of the Proposed Project would involve the use of construction-related chemicals. These include but are not limited to hydraulic fluids, motor oil, grease, runoff, and other related fluids and lubricants. The storage and use of these materials is highly regulated, and compliance with these regulations will be required of the Project contractor.
The construction activities would involve the disposal and recycling of materials, trash, and debris.
The Wren Multiple-Family Development Project Initial Study 59 October 2024
These materials would be disposed of via the City’s waste provider, which operates in compliance with local, state and federal regulations, as applicable. Burrtec will be responsible for disposing or recycling construction waste to licensed landfills.
Once constructed, the proposed dwelling units would use household hazardous materials (e.g., paint, pesticides, cleansers, and solvents) for maintenance activities but any use would be in limited household quantities. The dwelling units would not use, store, or generate hazardous materials or wastes in quantities that would pose a significant hazard to the public or the environment. Routine maintenance chemicals, such as commercially available pesticides and chlorine for pool cleaning would also be utilized. The quantities of these stored on site would be typical of other multi-family operations in the region, and the quantities of the materials to be stored, used, and transported would be minimal and not present a hazardous condition.
With mandatory regulatory compliance with Federal, State, and local laws, potential impacts associated with hazardous materials would be less than significant, and no mitigation would be required.
General Plan Amendment Analysis: A commercial project constructed on the Project Site would have similar needs for routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials as the Proposed Project, although depending on the use, moderate quantities of materials could be stored within a commercial business on the site. Any commercial project would also be required to comply with all Federal, State, and local laws, as with the Proposed Project. Therefore, there is a less than significant impact to the approval of a GPA to convert the property from commercial to residential uses.
c) Less Than Significant Impact. The Proposed Project is located within one-quarter mile of James Workman Middle School. Construction of the Proposed Project would involve the use of routine construction-related chemicals, but handling would be in compliance with all Federal, State, and local regulations. The Project would operate as a 204-apartment home complex and no hazardous materials would be generated. The limited use of household cleaning products and pool maintenance products would not occur in sufficient quantities to cause a risk to the school.
Therefore, the Project would not emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school. The impact would be less than significant.
General Plan Amendment Analysis: A commercial project constructed on the Project Site would have similar uses of hazardous materials during construction, and would be required to follow all Federal, State, and local regulations, similar to the Proposed Project. The uses allowed in the PCC zone are not producers of hazardous materials, and would be unlikely to pose a risk to the nearby school. Therefore, there is a less than significant impact to the approval of a GPA to convert the property from commercial to residential uses.
d) Less Than Significant Impact. Government Code Section 65962.5(a)(1) requires that the Department of Toxic Substance Control (DTSC) “shall compile and update as appropriate, but at least annually, and shall submit to the Secretary for Environmental Protection, a list of all the following: (1) all hazardous waste facilities subject to corrective action pursuant to Section 25187.5 of the Health and Safety Code (“HSC”).” This is known as the “Cortese List.” The following databases that meet the “Cortese List” requirements were reviewed for this Project.
The Wren Multiple-Family Development Project Initial Study 60 October 2024
• Envirostar Database. There are no sites listed in the Envirostar Database within 1,000 feet of the Project Site.
• Geotracker Database. Geotracker is the SWRCB’s database that manages potential hazardous sites to groundwater. There are no sites listed in the Geotracker Database within 1,000 feet of the Project Site.
Based on the result of the database review the Project Site is not located on any site that has been identified in accordance with Section 65962.5 of the Government Code. Therefore, the Project Site is not located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment. Impacts would be less than significant.
General Plan Amendment Analysis: A commercial project constructed on the Project Site would also have a less than significant impact because it would occur on the same site, which has no history of hazardous material on-site.. Therefore, there is a less than significant impact to the approval of a GPA to convert the property from commercial to residential uses. e) Less Than Significant Impact. The Palm Springs International Airport (PSP) is approximately
2.5 miles east of the Project Site and the Project is within Zone E of the Riverside County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan for the Palm Springs International Airport (RCALUCP-PS). The Project was, as required, reviewed be the Riverside County Airport Land Use Commission, which found the Project consistent with the RCALUCP, with conditions. The City will include the Commission’s conditions in the Project’s approval conditions, to assure that the Project remains consistent with the RCALUCP. The Project Site is not located near or adjacent to any noise contour, according to RCALUCP-PS Map PS-3. The closest noise contour (60 CNEL) exists in Palm Springs, along Gene Autry Trail, approximately 2.3 miles west of the Project Site. Therefore, the proposed Project would not result in a safety hazard or excessive noise for people residing or working in the Project area. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.
General Plan Amendment Analysis: A commercial project constructed on the Project Site would also have a less than significant impact because the analysis for this criterion is based on project location, not project type, and the Project Site is the same for both a commercial project and a residential project. Therefore, there is a less than significant impact to the approval of a GPA to convert the property from commercial to residential uses. f) Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed Project is a multi-family residential complex. The proposed Project will have primary access from Rosemount Road, which will be fully developed to Date Palm Drive, and a secondary access on the northern portion of the Project Site to a shared access road.
Emergency response and evacuation for the City are based on numerous access routes. The Proposed Project would not interfere with the City’s emergency operations plan or impede roadway access through removal or closure of any streets that provide through access because the Project’s design proposes no changes to City streets, including Date Palm Drive. All construction activities would be required to be performed according to the standards and regulations of the City and county fire and sheriff’s departments. It is not anticipated that existing roads near the Project Site including Date Palm and 30th Avenue would require closure for Project construction. Any The Wren Multiple-Family Development Project Initial Study 61 October 2024
road closures would follow the California Vehicle Code section 21101.4 which allows for temporary road closures, and the City would require a traffic control plan that allows for access by emergency vehicles and other emergency conditions. The Project contractor would also be required to follow the standards by the California Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OHSA) which also requires that construction site maintain emergency access to the site during construction.
The Proposed Project is also complying with the City’s development review and permitting process and will be conditioned to incorporate all applicable design and safety standards and regulations of the Riverside County Fire Department to ensure that the Proposed Project does not interfere with the provision of local emergency services (e.g., provision of adequate access roads to accommodate emergency response vehicles, adequate numbers/locations of fire hydrants).
Overall, the Proposed Project would not impair implementation of or physically interfere with the City of Cathedral City’s emergency operations plan or evacuation plan. Therefore, there would be less than significant impacts associated with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan, and no mitigation would be required.
General Plan Amendment Analysis: A commercial project constructed on the Project Site would also be required to comply with the City’s development review and permitting process and would be conditioned to incorporate all applicable design and safety standards and regulations of the Riverside County Fire Department to ensure that it would not interfere with the provision of local emergency services (e.g., provision of adequate access roads to accommodate emergency response vehicles, adequate numbers/locations of fire hydrants),. Therefore, there is a less than significant impact to the approval of a GPA to convert the property from commercial to residential uses. g) No Impact. The Project Site is located in an urban area. There are no wildlands near the Project Site. Exhibit S-7 “Fire Hazard Zones Map” of the City’s General Plan identifies that the Project Site is located in a Non-Very High Fire Hazard Safety Zone. Therefore, the Project would not expose people or structures, either directly or indirectly, to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires.
General Plan Amendment Analysis: A commercial project constructed on the Project Site would not be in a fire zone, and would not be impacted by wildland fires.
Mitigation Measures:
None required.
Monitoring:
None required.
The Wren Multiple-Family Development Project Initial Study 62 October 2024
X. HYDROLOGY AND WATER
QUALITY
Would the Project:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a) Violate any water quality standards or waste
discharge requirements or otherwise
substantially degrade surface or ground water
quality?
✓
b) Substantially decrease groundwater supplies
or interfere substantially with groundwater
recharge such that the project may impede
sustainable groundwater management of the
basin?
✓
c) Substantially alter the existing drainage
pattern of the site or area, including through the
alteration of the course of a stream or river or
through the addition of impervious surfaces, in
a manner which would:
✓
(i) result in substantial erosion or siltation onor off-site; ✓ (ii) substantially increase the rate or amount of
surface runoff in a manner which would result
in flooding on- or off-site;
✓
(iii) create or contribute runoff water which
would exceed the capacity of existing or
planned stormwater drainage systems or
provide substantial additional sources of
polluted runoff; or
✓
(iv) impede or redirect flood flows? ✓
(d) In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones,
risk release of pollutants due to project
inundation?
✓
(e) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of
a water quality control plan or sustainable
groundwater management plan?
✓
Sources: City of Cathedral City 2040 General Plan; City of Cathedral City General Plan Update DEIR, 2019; Preliminary Hydrology Study, for The Wren, APN 670-110-043, prepared by Christiansen & Company, October 2023 (Appendix E-1) Project Specific Water Quality Management Plan, prepared by Christiansen & Company, October 11, 2023 (Appendix E-2); Google Earth Pro.
Environmental Setting
The Project Site is presently vacant, and the existing flow created from the vacant land drains historically northwest to southeast. The project area is covered by FIRM Panel Number 06065C1595G and 06065C01615G, revised August 28, 2008, which indicates the Project area lies within Zone X, indicating “areas determined to be outside the 0.2%”.
A Preliminary Hydrology Study was prepared (Appendix E-1) to analyze the existing and proposed site conditions to determine the 100-year peak discharges from offsite sub-watersheds and, to determine onsite conditions to satisfy the criteria set forth in the Riverside County Hydrology Manual.
The Wren Multiple-Family Development Project Initial Study 63 October 2024
The Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) provides service to the Project Site for domestic water, irrigation water, sanitary sewer collection, wastewater reclamation and recycling. CVWD obtains water from both the upper and lower Whitewater River subbasins and the Mission Creek subbasin. The Whitewater River subbasin supply is shared by CVWD, Desert Water Agency, the cities of Indio and Coachella, Myoma Dunes Water Company and numerous private groundwater users.
Groundwater is the principal source of municipal water supply in the Coachella Valley, supplemented by State Water Project (SWP) exchange water, recycled water and treated Colorado River water to meet demand. Groundwater supplies in the basin are collectively planned by the various water providers, including the CVWD. A Regional Urban Water Management Plan (RUWMP) is prepared every five years to address the requirement of the California Water Code that requires planning for anticipated water supply. The RUWMP relies on SCAG’s growth forecast for water demand estimations to reflect patterns and expectations for land use within the service area. The most current RUMP is the 2020 Coachella Valley Regional Urban Water Management Plan (CVRUMP) which used 25-year planning period from 2020 to 2045.
Water qualify for the Whitewater River groundwater basin is managed by the Colorado River Basin Regional Water Quality Control Board (CR-RWQCB), which is responsible for the preparation and implementation of the water quality control plan for the basin. The Basin Plan defines the beneficial uses, water quality objectives, implementation programs, and monitoring and assessment programs for the waters in the region. Specifically, the Basin Plan designates beneficial uses for surface water and groundwater; sets narrative and numerical objectives that must be attained or maintained to protect the designated beneficial uses and conform to the state's anti-degradation policy; describes implementation programs to protect the beneficial uses of all waters in the region; and describes surveillance and monitoring activities to evaluate the effectiveness of the Basin Plan.
The City’s municipal stormwater system (MS4) consists of gutters, inlets, catch basins and channels, which flow untreated to the Whitewater Channel, and ultimately absorbed into the groundwater or flows to the Salton Sea. The City of Cathedral City is a co-permittee to Riverside County’s National Pollutant Discharge Elimination Permit (NPDES) which seeks to control water quality through various requirements for development.
Discussion of Impacts
a) Less Than Significant Impact. The following identifies how the Proposed Project would not violate water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface or ground water quality.
Construction Impacts
Construction-related runoff pollutants are typically generated from waste and hazardous materials handling or storage areas, outdoor work areas, material storage areas, and general maintenance areas (e.g., vehicle or equipment fueling and maintenance, including washing). Construction projects that disturb 1 acre or more of soil, including the Proposed Project, are regulated under the construction general permit (CGP, Order No. 2009-009-DWQ) and its subsequent revisions (Order No. 2012-0006-DWQ) issued by the SWRCB. Projects obtain coverage under the Construction General Permit (CGP) by developing and implementing a SWPPP, estimating sediment risk from construction activities to receiving waters, and specifying best management practices that would The Wren Multiple-Family Development Project Initial Study 64 October 2024
be implemented as a part of the Proposed Project’s construction phase to minimize pollution of stormwater prior to and during grading and construction.
The Property Owner/Developer and its construction contractor would have to prepare and implement a SWPPP and associated BMPs in compliance with the CGP during grading and construction. The SWPPP would specify BMPs that would be implemented for the Proposed Project to protect the water quality of receiving waters (Whitewater River Channel and Coachella Valley Stormwater Channel). Other construction BMPs that may be incorporated into the Proposed Project’s SWPPP and implemented during the construction phase include but are not limited to:
• Installation of perimeter silt fences and perimeter sandbags and/or gravel bags • Stabilized construction exits with rumble strip(s)/plate(s) • Installation of storm drain inlet protection on affected roadways • Installation of silt fences around stockpile and covering of stockpiles • Stabilization of disturbed areas where construction ceases for a determined period of time (e.g., one week) with erosion controls
• Installation of temporary sanitary facilities and dumpsters Adherence to the BMPs in the SWPPP would reduce, prevent, minimize, and/or treat pollutants and prevent degradation of downstream receiving waters; reduce or avoid contamination of urban runoff with sediment; and reduce or avoid contamination with other pollutants such as trash and debris, oil, grease, fuels, and other toxic chemicals.
Furthermore, Section 14.22.100 (Stormwater conveyance system protection) of the City’s municipal code regulates grading and construction activities as they relate to stormwater pollution.
Any person engaged in development, grading, or construction within the City shall comply with all applicable local ordinances, including the grading and erosion control section in Title 15 of the municipal code, the standard specifications for public works construction when performing public works, and applicable provisions of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System CGP for stormwater discharges associated with construction activity issued by the SWRCB and California RWQCB, NPDES No. CAS 618033, Order No. R8-2002-0011.
Therefore, with implementation of the BMPs in the required SWPPP, water quality or wastedischarge impacts from Project-related grading and construction activities would be less than significant, and no mitigation would be required.
Operations Impacts
Post construction stormwater management for the apartment community preserves the existing overall drainage pattern. Drainage is directed as sheet flow to collect to underground gutters that would direct the flows into a 1.04 acre stormwater retention/infiltration basin located along the eastern boundary, in accordance with the Project Specific Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (PWQMP, Appendix E-2). The stormwater system has been designed to retain 100 percent of the 100-year, 3-hour storm event within the entire property boundary per the City of Cathedral City stormwater ordinance. Table 4 of the PWQMP identifies that the retention/infiltration basin completely addresses the “Treatment Control BMP requirement” for the Project’s drainage area.
The new, short sections of drive aisles to be developed within the Northgate Church property would drain into the existing retention basin on the Northgate Church property. These new sections The Wren Multiple-Family Development Project Initial Study 65 October 2024
of drive aisles are approximately 26 feet wide and a total of 486 feet long, or approximately 12,975 square feet of impervious surface, which is anticipated to be within the capacity of the existing basin.
The Project will be required to construct sanitary sewer connections to the existing CVWD conveyance system to CVWD’s standards. CVWD implements all RWQCB standards for waste discharge in its conveyance, and at its treatment facilities. These standards and requirements assure that individual projects comply with waste discharge requirements.
Therefore, with implementation of the BMPs in the PWQMP and compliance with NPDES MS4 permit requirements, potential impacts associated with water quality and waste-discharge impacts would be less than significant and no mitigation would be required.
General Plan Amendment Analysis: A commercial project constructed on the Project Site would also be required to comply with the requirements of the State’s GCP during construction and a WQMP for operations, as with the case of the Proposed Project. Sewer connections would also be to CVWD and RWQCB standards. Therefore, there is a less than significant impact to the approval of a GPA to convert the property from commercial to residential uses. b) Less Than Significant Impact. The Proposed Project will not substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that the Project may impede sustainable groundwater management of the basin. The proposed Project will not utilize any wells for domestic water, nor does the Project propose to drill any wells to supply water to the Project.
All of the Project’s stormwater will infiltrate into the groundwater basin, which would serve to enhance the basin’s supply.
The CVWD, the Project’s water supplier, receives its supply from groundwater. The CVRUMP identified that for the CVWD, projected potable water demands for multi-family residential would be 6,873 acre feet in 2025 increasing to 9,045 in 2045, out of a total of 148,166 acre feet projected to be needed by 2045 across all land use types. The CVRUMP notes that he projected demand increase from 2020 to 2025 reflects planned expansion of the service area to include areas not currently connected to the CVWD system.
The 2020 CVRUMP states that future multi-family residences are expected to use less water than existing properties due to the mandated use of high efficiency plumbing fixtures under the CalGreen building standards and reduced landscape water use mandated by CVWD’s Landscaping Ordinance.
Domestic water will be provided via existing water lines on Date Palm Drive from the water purveyor, CVWD. The Project’s water usage was calculated using the CVWD Design Manual as follows:
Land Use Units *gpd/Unit Demand (gpd) AFY
Residential - Multi/Apartments 204 180.95 36913.80 41.38 Clubhouse 5 180.95 904.75 1.01
Open Space 37.67
Grand Total 209 180.95 37818.55 80.06
* calculated at 55 gpd/person using City of Cathedral City General Plan persons /unit multifamily=3.29 person/unit = 180.95 gpd/unit
The Wren Multiple-Family Development Project Initial Study 66 October 2024
Considering the CVWD supplied 99,843 acre feet in 2020 and the projected demand would be 123,461 acre feet in 2025, the Project’s anticipated usage would represent approximately 0.06 percent of CVWD’s total gross projected demand by 2025. The Proposed Project would also be a new complex, using the latest water efficient fixtures and drought tolerant landscaping, in accordance with City policy. The Applicant for the Proposed Project would also be required to coordinate water supply with the CVWD to ensure adequate water delivery. Therefore, the impact on water supply would be less than significant. The CVWD would have sufficient water supply for the Proposed Project. Therefore, impacts to the groundwater aquifer are less than significant.
General Plan Amendment Analysis: The RWUMP identified that the actual demands for water delivery, both past and future were greater in the commercial sector than in the residential sector as identified in the following tables:
Excerpt from 2020 CVRUMP, Table 4-7 DWR 4-1 Actual Demands for Water (AFY) Use Type
Additional
Description
Level of
Treatment When
Delivered 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Multi-Family Drinking Water 3,743 3,863 3,893 3,853 3,996 Commercial Drinking Water 4,978 5,072 5,039 4,883 4,242 Excerpt from 2020 CVRUMP, Table 4-8 DWR 4-2 Projected Retail Demands for Water (AFY) Use Type
Additional
Description
Projected Water Use
2025 2030 2035 2040 2045
Single Family 60,142 63,824 67,331 69,816 71,695
Multi-Family 6,873 7,245 7,742 8,267 9,045
CII 7,060 7,244 7,438 7,709 7,985
Landscape 34,193 36,205 38,226 39,865 41,516
Other 1,457 1,563 1,670 1,755 1,840
Losses 13,736 14,501 15,222 15,670 16,085
Total 123,461 130,582 137,629 143,082 148,166
Note: Projections based on demand projections in draft Alternative Plan Updates for Indio Subbasin and Mission Creek Subbasin. The projected demand increase from 2020 to 2025 reflects planned expansion of the service area to include areas not current connected to the CVWD system. The timing of this expansion will depend on the availability of grant funding.
As no commercial project has been designated for the Project Site, and to determine if the General Plan Amendment would have an impact on water demand, a hypothetical commercial project was assumed per City of Cathedral City Planning Department, known as “Project A,” and uses a proportion of the 25.0 acre Food4Less commercial complex at 34251 Date Palm Drive, Cathedral City. The analysis utilized a proportional approach in assuming that 10.5 acres, or 41.9 percent of the total Restaurants, Medical Building and Mixed Commercial would occur and added that to the actual area of the Theater Building and Chevron Gas Site. This created a total for Mixed Commercial and was added to Neighborhood Commercial Area of the Food4Less Building. The water usage for such a commercial project was determined as follows:
The Wren Multiple-Family Development Project Initial Study 67 October 2024
Land Use Bldg. Area *gpd/Unit Demand (gpd) AFY
Neighborhood Commercial 54,600 64 9,575.59 10.73
Mixed Use 108,607 64 190,47.18 21.35
Restaurant 9,180 331 18,182.00 20.38
Open Space 37.67
Grand Total 172,387 64 46,804.76 90.13
Therefore, as the Proposed Project’s water usage is 80.06 AFY, and a hypothetical commercial project would be 90.13 AFY, this is consistent with the RWUMP’s assessment that commercial projects typically use more water than multifamily residential.
Given that multi-family demand is generally less than commercial demand, there is a less than significant impact to the approval of a GPA to convert the property from commercial to residential uses.
c i-iv) Less Than Significant Impact. There are no natural drainages on site, therefore, the Proposed Project would not substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the Project Site or alter the course of a stream or river. The post-construction drainage pattern has been designed to remain the same as the preconstruction drainage pattern so that on-site runoff would not exceed that of the existing condition. Stormwater runoff within the Project Site is captured via proposed catch basins and conveyed into a 1.04 acre stormwater retention basin located along the eastern boundary, in accordance with the PWQMP and Hydrology Study. Stormwater from the new drive aisles to be developed within the Northgate Church property would drain into the existing retention basin within the Northgate Church property and would only marginally increase the storm flows due to their limited size. The Project Site is not located in a floodplain.
All construction and grading activities would comply with City’s grading ordinance using BMPs, including the use of storm drain inlet protection, efficient irrigation systems and landscape design, and common area litter control. Upon completion, the Project Site would be developed with a 204- apartment home complex that would include paved surfaces and landscaping which reduces native soil areas that are subject to erosion, and includes an internal drainage system to direct stormwater for collection and treatment. The Project design would prevent substantial erosion from occurring.
Therefore:
i) The Project would not result in substantial erosion or siltation on-site or off-site because the Project is designed to minimize native soil areas that can erode, and all Project stormwater flows are directed into a collection basin for infiltration. There would be a less than significant impact.
ii) The Project would not substantially increase the rate or amount of surface water runoff in a manner that would reduce flooding on or off-site because the drainage for the Project has been designed in accordance with the City of Cathedral City standards which require that the peak volume of the 100-year, 3-hour storm be retained on site and street storm drains be designed to convey the 100-year, 1-hour peak flow. There would be a less than significant impact.
The Wren Multiple-Family Development Project Initial Study 68 October 2024
iii) The Project would not create or contribute to runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff because the Project has been designed to retain all drainage on site, in accordance with the City of Cathedral City standards which require that the peak volume of the 100-year, 3-hour storm be retained on site and street storm drains be designed to convey the 100-year, 1-hour peak flow.
iv) The Project would not impede or redirect flood flows because the Project is located in an area outside of the 0.2 percent chance of flooding, according to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), Flood Rate Insurance Rate (FIRM) map panel 06065C1595G.
Overall, there is a less than significant impact.
General Plan Amendment Analysis: A commercial project would be required to comply with similar design criteria as a residential project with respect drainage management. Therefore, there is a less than significant impact to the approval of a GPA to convert the property from commercial to residential uses.
d) No Impact. The Proposed Project will not risk release of pollutants due to project inundation as a result of a flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones. The proposed Project Site is not located in an area susceptible to such hazards. Therefore, no impact would occur. Similarly, no impact would occur as a result of a General Plan Amendment to convert the property from commercial to residential uses.
e) Less Than Significant Impact. The Proposed Project would not conflict or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan. The RWQCB regulates surface and ground water quality in the Colorado River Basin Region. Water supplies in the Project vicinity are managed by the CVWD. The Project Site lies within the Whitewater River subbasin, which receives most of its inflow from groundwater replenishment facilities and from agricultural and urban return flows. The CVWD replenishes the basin with water imported from outside the basin and implementation of water conservation measures, water supply development, source substitution, and water quality protection.
Water quality would be addressed by the Proposed Project’s requirement to prepare and implement a SWPPP and associated BMPs in compliance with the CGP during grading and construction. The Project would be operated in accordance with a final WQMP which would be approved by the City and operated by the Project’s management firm. The WQMP identifies that all surface water would be directed into a retention/infiltration basin which would also serve to recharge the groundwater. No aspect of the project involves groundwater wells or groundwater pumping.
For compliance with a sustainable groundwater management plan, the CVWD, in conjunction with various other water agencies in the region, develop updated plans to address long-term sustainable management of the groundwater basin. These plans were approved by the California Department of Water Resources to meet planning requirements of the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA). While the RUWMP is focused on water used for municipal supply, it addresses all water use in the Valley, including golf course and agricultural irrigation. As the Proposed Project’s water usage is a fraction of the total demand anticipated, the Proposed Project would not interfere with the implementation of the CVWD’s RUWMP.
The Wren Multiple-Family Development Project Initial Study 69 October 2024
Therefore the Proposed Project will not conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan. Impacts are expected to be less than significant.
General Plan Amendment Analysis: A commercial project would be required to comply with similar design criteria as a residential project with respect water quality and sustainable groundwater management. Therefore, there is a less than significant impact to the approval of a GPA to convert the property from commercial to residential uses.
Mitigation Measures:
None required.
Monitoring:
None required.
The Wren Multiple-Family Development Project Initial Study 70 October 2024
XI. LAND USE AND PLANNING
Would the Project:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a) Physically divide an established
community? ✓
b) Cause a significant environmental impact
due to a conflict with any land use plan,
policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose
of avoiding or mitigating an environmental
effect?
✓
Sources: City of Cathedral City 2040 General Plan, Adopted 2021; City of Cathedral City General Plan Update DEIR, 2019; Cathedral City Municipal Code; Project materials; Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP); Project materials; Google Earth Pro.
Environmental Setting
The Project Site is currently vacant. Surrounding land uses include single-family residential on the east, Northgate Community Church on the north, and future commercial development to the west and south.
City of Cathedral City General Plan and Zoning
The Project Site was formerly the northern parcel of the Uptown Village Project, approved in 2007. This Project consisted of 20 acres of vacant land, bisected by Rosemount Road which would have been constructed from the residential neighborhood to the east, to connect to Date Palm Drive to the west. The Uptown Village Project proposed to construct a retail center on the parcels south of Rosemount Road and proposed a concept plan for a mixed use residential development for the northern parcel (Project Site). The Uptown Village Project approvals consisted of a General Plan Amendment to change the properties from Low Density Residential to General Commercial, and the zoning was changed from Single Family Residential to Planned Community Commercial. The Project was never constructed.
Therefore, the Project Site has a land use designation of General Commercial (CG) on the City’s General Plan Land Use Map. The Project Site has a zoning designation of Planned Community Commercial (PCC) on the City’s Zoning Map. The PCC zone provides for “retail and service commercial uses which are of a relatively high intensity and are necessary to provide a wide range of shopping facilities and goods, professional and administrative offices and entertainment” (Chapter 9.30.010).
The Proposed Project consists of a 204-apartment home complex in 12 separate buildings, common areas, and retention areas on approximately 10.48 gross acres and 10.48 net acres. The type of use of the proposed Project is not allowed within the PCC zone.
The Proposed Project is consistent with the R3 (Multiple Family Residential) zone, which is “to provide appropriately located areas for multiple-family dwellings at a medium to high range of population density, and to provide space for community facilities needed to complement urban residential areas” (City Code Chapter
9.20.20 – Purpose and Intent). The City defines density in the R3 zone as ranging from 11 to 20 dwelling units per acre at medium density to 20 to 24 dwelling units per acre at high density (City Code Chapter 9.20.050).
The Project provides for approximately 19.46 dwelling units per acre.
Therefore, the Project requires approval of a Change of Zone and General Plan Amendment as part of Project entitlements to be consistent with the City’s codes.
The Wren Multiple-Family Development Project Initial Study 71 October 2024
Riverside County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan Policy Document – Palm Springs International Airport (RCALUCP-PS)
The locations of the standard flight paths flown by aircraft approaching and departing the airport are the primary factors defining the influence area for Palm Springs International Airport. Close-in areas west of the airport are affected by sideline noise, but the more distant areas are seldom overflown and thus are excluded from the airport influence area.
The Project Site is located in Zone E of the Palm Springs International Airport influence area, according to the RCALUCP-PS. According to the RCALUCP-PS, there are no development standards in the Zone E area. Development conditions for Zone E, require review by the ALUC for conformance with the RCALUCP.
Discussion of Impacts
a) No Impact. The subject property is currently vacant and undeveloped. The proposed Project will provide pedestrian and vehicular connectivity between the Project Site and existing urban neighborhoods via sidewalks and new roadways. Circulation patterns are consistent with the Circulation Element of the General Plan and will not physically divide any established community.
There will be no impact.
General Plan Consistency Analysis. Similarly, a commercial project constructed on the Project Site would also likely provide similar pedestrian and vehicular connectivity between the Project Site and existing urban neighborhoods via sidewalks and new roadways. Therefore, there would be no impact to the approval of a GPA to convert the property from commercial to residential uses. b) Less Than Significant. The City of Cathedral City identifies the Project Site has a land use designation of General Commercial (CG) on the City’s General Plan Land Use Map. The Project Site has a zoning designation of Planned Community Commercial (PCC) on the City’s Zoning Map. The Project requires approval of a Change of Zone and General Plan Amendment as part of Project entitlements.
The Project is consistent with RMH designation (Medium-High Density Residential, 11-20 dwelling units per acre) as it offers 19.46 dwelling units per acre. The City’s General Plan identifies RMH as follows:
This designation allows for a range of attached housing, including apartments and condominiums. It is also suitable for planned communities and affordable and senior housing, where smaller units and higher densities may be appropriate. Multi-family development provides for PUDs comprised of a varying range of residential types and onsite amenities. These lands are typically located in proximity to neighborhood commercial uses, thereby maximizing pedestrian and other multi-modal access to these essential services. Mobile home parks or subdivisions with PUD type development may also be allowed.
The Proposed Project’s General Plan Amendment request is consistent with the City’s General Plan Land Use Element. Land Use Intensities section, which states that the City “has increased residential densities as part of its sustainability strategy and is supported by its Community Design Element standards and guidelines.” Therefore, the Proposed Project is consistent in concept with the general direction of the City to offer additional housing opportunities. The Goals and Policies The Wren Multiple-Family Development Project Initial Study 72 October 2024
for residential development in the City’s General Plan require the City to review all proposed residential developments to ensure consistency with the City’s desire for well-designed, safe, pedestrian friendly, compatible housing opportunities. The Project has undergone City staff review, and will continue to do so for construction.
Table 8: Residential Land Use Goals, Policies and Programs identifies the vision and implementation programs for residential development in the city, and how the Proposed Project would be consistent with the residential land use envisioned.
Table 8: Residential Land Use Goals, Policies and Programs General Plan Goals and Policies Project Consistency
General Goals and Policies
Goal 1: A complete, balanced and integrated pattern of
land uses appropriately scaled and designed to meet
the domestic, productive and social needs of all
members of the community, while providing a varied
and cohesive fabric that is sustainable, empowering
and humanizing
Consistent: The General Plan envisions, in this Goal,
that land uses should be balanced based on
community need. The Proposed Project provides for
market rate rental units which will support the City’s
continued need for additional housing. The GPA
proposed for the Project Site will result in a loss of only 5% of the City’s General Commercial land, in an area
of Date Palm Drive where substantial additional
commercially designated land occurs. The Project will
not create an imbalance in land use, but rather will
support the changes in the City occurring currently,
particularly relating to housing availability.
Residential Land Use Goals and Policies
Goal 1: Residential neighborhoods and developments
that provide safe, wholesome and enhancing
environments for living, enjoyment, growth and
development of all residents, including the community’s children and seniors
Consistent. The Wren is a 204-unit apartment complex
designed with a variety of studio, 1 bedroom, 2
bedroom and 3 bedroom units, with garages, required
additional parking and amenities including a pool and
a children’s play area. The pool deck provides a variety of shading to include gazebos, landscape and trellises.
The community includes 2.13 acres of open space,
well exceeding the required minimum of 1.4 acres.
The site design has also taken into consideration the
strong northwest winds by placing the taller buildings
in a way that shieldsthe common open space. The club
house provides a gym, a leasing office, a flexible
gathering space for family events and a private office
space with meeting room to aid professionals with
remote work. The Project therefore supports Goal 1 in
creating a safe residential neighborhood.
Goal 2: Residential developments of distinctive
character that provide a full range of housing types,
products and costs to accommodate the needs of the
City's existing and future residents of the community.
• Policy 1: Existing residential neighborhoods
and vacant residential lands shall be managed
and regulated to enhance the distinct
character of each, while assuring
compatibility between existing and future
development.
• Policy 3: Development proposals on noncontiguous or isolated lands shall be Consistent. The Wren is a 204-unit apartment complex
designed with a variety of studio, 1 bedroom, 2
bedroom and 3 bedroom units, with garages, required
additional parking and amenities including a pool and
a children’s play area. The Project is conveniently
located near shopping and other residential
development. The Proposed Project would also
construct Rosemount Road to City standards, that
would serve not only the Project residents but also
provide direct access to Date Palm Drive for the
subdivision to the east of the Project Site.
The Proposed Project has undergone Architectural
Review by City staff and will continue to undergo
The Wren Multiple-Family Development Project Initial Study 73 October 2024
discouraged to avoid the creation of irregular,
disruptive and inefficient development
patterns.
• Policy 10: All residential development shall be
subject to review by the City Architectural
Review Committee and/or the City Planning
staff for compliance with City architectural
standards and guidelines.
o Program 10.A: Residential subdivision
applications, which include models of
residential product to be developed,
shall be reviewed and approved by the
Architectural Review Committee. All
other residential development
applications shall be reviewed by
Planning staff for compliance with
applicable architectural design
standards and guidelines.
architectural review until approved by the Planning
Commission.
The Project was reviewed by the Airport Land Use Commission, and found consistent with the RCALUCP, with conditions. The City will include these conditions in the Project’s conditions of approval, thereby assuring consistency with ALUC regulations.
Therefore, the proposed Project will not cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect.
General Plan Amendment Analysis. The City’s General Plan Land Use Element identifies that there were 559.73 acres of land identified for General Commercial Land Use, of which 193.24 were vacant, and 22.06 acres of Medium-High Density Residential of which 21.53 acres were vacant. Converting 10.48 acres of the 193.24 acres from General Commercial to Medium-High Density Residential would represent removing 5.4 percent of vacant General Commercial and placing this into Medium-High Density Residential. This would not cause a shortage in available lands where the land use is General Commercial. The General Plan Amendment would also increase the total acres of Medium-High Density Residential from 21.53 to 32.54, while not reducing the available vacant lands for Medium-High Density Residential.
Mitigation Measures:
None required.
Monitoring:
None required.
The Wren Multiple-Family Development Project Initial Study 74 October 2024
XII. MINERAL RESOURCES
Would the Project:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a) Result in the loss of availability of a known
mineral resource that would be of value to the
region and the residents of the state?
✓
b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally
important mineral resource recovery site
delineated on a local general plan, specific
plan or other land use plan?
✓
Sources: City of Cathedral City 2040 General Plan; City of Cathedral City General Plan Update DEIR, 2019; Project materials; Google Earth Pro; Mineral Land Classification Map, Riverside County, California.
Environmental Setting
According to the City’s General Plan, the California Geological Survey collects and analyzes information about the State’s mineral resources. The State Geologist classifies land for mineral resources solely on the basis of geologic factors, regardless of existing land use and land ownership. Mineral land classifications for Portland cement concrete (PCC)-grade aggregate materials in the Coachella Valley were mapped by the State Geological Survey in 1988 and updated in 2007. Areas subject to mineral land classification studies are divided by the State Geologist into Mineral Resource Zone (MRZ) categories that reflect varying degrees of mineral resource potential. Cathedral City is categorized as Mineral Resource Zone 3 (MRZ-3) which are lands which contain mineral deposits, the significance of which cannot be evaluated from available data.
Discussion of Impacts
a, b) No Impact. The Project Site is currently undeveloped. The Project area is located within a Statedesignated Mineral Resource Zone MRZ-3. The Project Site is located within an urbanized area and is not designated for mineral resource extraction; there are no mining or mineral resource lands in the vicinity of the Project. Therefore, the Project would not result in the loss of availability of a mineral resource or a mineral resource recovery site. No impacts would occur.
General Plan Amendment Analysis: A commercial project constructed on the Project Site would also have no impact because the parcel is the same for both a commercial project and a residential project. Therefore, there is no impact to the approval of a GPA to convert the property from commercial to residential uses.
Mitigation Measures:
None required.
Monitoring:
None required.
The Wren Multiple-Family Development Project Initial Study 75 October 2024
XIII. NOISE
Would the Project result in:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a) Generation of a substantial temporary or
permanent increase in ambient noise levels in
the vicinity of the project in excess of
standards established in the local general plan
or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of
other agencies?
✓
b) Generation of excessive ground borne
vibration or ground borne noise levels? ✓
c) For a project located within the vicinity of
a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or,
where such a plan has not been adopted,
within two miles of a public airport or public
use airport, would the project expose people
residing or working in the project area to
excessive noise levels?
✓
Sources: City of Cathedral City 2040 General Plan; City of Cathedral City General Plan Update DEIR, 2019; City of Cathedral City Municipal Code Section 11.96; Date Palm Apartments Noise Impact Study, prepared by MD Acoustics, October 17, 2023 (Appendix F); Riverside County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan; Project materials; Google Earth Pro.
Environmental Setting
Noise has been simply defined as "unwanted sound." Sound becomes unwanted when it interferes with normal activities, when it causes actual physical harm or when it has adverse effects on health. Noise is measured on a logarithmic scale of sound pressure level known as a decibel (dB). A‐weighted decibels (dBA) approximate the subjective response of the human ear to broad frequency noise source by discriminating against very low and very high frequencies of the audible spectrum. They are adjusted to reflect only those frequencies which are audible to the human ear.
Elevated ambient noise levels can have a direct impact on the desirability of parks and open space, residential and other use of lands by the community and businesses and can negatively affect their longterm social and economic viability. For this reason, land use compatibility with the surrounding noise environment is one of the most important aspects of a noise impact analysis. This includes the identification of receptors that are particularly sensitive to noise intrusion, such as residences, schools, libraries, churches, hospitals and other health care facilities, and nursing homes.
The Project Site is currently vacant. The Proposed Project will have 204 apartment homes, a common recreation area with a pool, spa, BBQs, and fitness gym. There is also small pocket/dog park proposed within the development. Surrounding lands include residential development to the east of the site, Date Palm Drive to the west, a church to the north, and vacant lands to the south.
A noise analysis (Appendix F) was prepared to evaluate existing and noise levels and potential impacts from the Proposed Project.
The Wren Multiple-Family Development Project Initial Study 76 October 2024
The City of Cathedral City’s General Plan Noise Element identifies the major source of continuous, excessive noise in the City. Those sources are traffic noise propagating from main roadways and also freight rail service along the Southern Pacific Railroad, parallel to the I-10 highway. Airport noise can impact occasionally the noise environment. Sensitive receptors are identified as schools, libraries, and medical facilities. The City of Cathedral City has adopted a noise ordinance to address the State requirement outlined by the California Government Code Section 65032, subsection (f) and section 21083.1 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA),e through Chapter 11.96 of the City Municipal Code as follows:
Zone Time dB(A) Level
Residential – Exterior Noise 7 a.m. – 10 p.m. 65
10 p.m. - 7 a.m. 50
Residential – Interior Noise 7 a.m. – 10 p.m. 50
10 p.m. - 7 a.m. 40
Commercial Industrial – Exterior Noise 7 a.m. – 10 p.m. 85 10 p.m. – 7 a.m. 55
The noise analysis in Appendix F indicates that the equivalent ambient level measured 67 dBA Leq occurs at the southwest corner of the Project Site. Maximum levels reach up to 79 dBA at this location due to traffic along Date Palm Drive. The minimum noise level measured was 39 dBA at this location. The measured ambient level at or near the Project Site shows that the primary noise source is traffic along Date Palm Drive.
The noise analysis studied noise impacts at three receptor locations: two locations along the east side of the property representing single family residences adjacent to the Project, and one receptor location on the south side of Rosemount Road, reflecting single-family residential southeast of the site.
Discussion of Impacts
a) Less than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated. The Proposed Project would not generate a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the Project Site in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies according to the noise analysis in Appendix F. The following calculates the potential noise emissions associated with the temporary construction activities and long-term operations of the Proposed Project and compares the noise levels to City standards.
Construction Noise
Construction noise is considered a short-term impact and would be considered significant if construction activities occur outside the allowable times as described in the City’s Municipal Code (Section 11.96.070). Construction is anticipated to occur during the permissible hours according to the City’s Municipal Code. Construction noise will have a temporary or periodic increase in the ambient noise level above the existing within the Project vicinity.
Typical operating cycles for various types of construction equipment may involve one or two minutes of full power operation followed by three to four minutes at lower power settings. Noise levels will be loudest during grading phase. A likely worst-case construction noise scenario during grading assumes the use of a grader, a dozer, and two (2) excavators, two (2) backhoes and a scraper operating at 320 feet from the nearest sensitive receptor (residences to the east). Assuming The Wren Multiple-Family Development Project Initial Study 77 October 2024
a usage factor of 40 percent for each piece of equipment, unmitigated noise levels at 290 feet have the potential to reach 69 dBA Leq and 73 dBA Lmax at the nearest sensitive receptors during grading. Noise levels for the other construction phases would be lower and range between 62 to 65 dBA. The impact would be less than significant.
Operational Noise
The proposed residential uses are considered noise‐sensitive receiving land uses and are not expected to generate any specific type of operational noise levels beyond the typical noise sources associated with similar existing residential land use in the Project area. Thus, the primary Project‐ related stationary (operational) noise sources will be mechanical ventilation (e.g., air conditioning). The proposed Project operational noise levels during the daytime and nighttime hours are expected to range from 42 dBA to 43 dBA Leq (refer to Table 9: Worst-case Predicted Operational Noise Level, and Appendix F, Exhibit G). Thus, the proposed Project‐related operational noise level increases will be below the operational noise level increase criteria at the nearest sensitive receiver locations and the impact will be less than significant.
Table 9: Worst-case Predicted Operational Noise Level
Receptor1 Floor
Existing
Ambient
Noise Level
(dBA, Leq)2
Project
Noise
Level
(dBA,
Leq)3
Total
Combined
Noise Level
(dBA, Leq)
Daytime (7AM - 10PM)
Stationary Noise Limit
Exterior (dBA, Leq)4
Exceeds
Exterior
Standard
Change inNoise
Level as Result
of Project
1 1 56 41 56 65 No 0.0
2 1 58 42 58 65 No 0.0
3 1 56 41 56 65 No 0.0
Notes:
1. Receptor 1 - 3 represents residential uses. 2. The ambient noise condition was estimated using the FHWA TNM based on receiver distance to Date Palm Dr and calibrated to the noise measurement performed at the Project Site. See Appendix F for noise measurement and Appendix F for traffic noise calculation sheets. 3. See Exhibit F of Appendix F for the operational noise level projections at said receptors. 4. Per Section 11.96.030 from the City's Municipal Code.
Off-Site Traffic Noise
A worst-case Project generated traffic noise level was modeled utilizing the FHWA Traffic Noise Prediction Model - FHWA-RD-77-108 (Appendix F). Traffic noise levels were calculated at two locations. The first one represents the residences close to the south edge of the Project Site, and is approximately 400 feet from the centerline of Date Palm Drive. The second location represents the residences to the east of the Project Site and is 670 feet from the centerline of Date Palm Drive.
Additionally at the first location the impact is analyzed from the Rosemont Avenue gate. The trip generation for the multi-family residence project is 1,375 daily trips on Date Palm Drive. As shown in Table 10: Change in Existing Noise Levels as a Result of the Project, below, the Project will increase noise levels by 0.2 to 0.4 dBA CNEL and will remain below the City General Plan CNEL standard. The Project’s operational traffic noise impacts will therefore be less than significant.
The Wren Multiple-Family Development Project Initial Study 78 October 2024
Table 10: Change in Existing Noise Levels as a Result of the Project Roadway Segment
CNEL at locations dBA1,2
Existing
Without
Project
Existing
With
Project
Change
in
Noise
Level
Potential
Significant
Impact
Date Palm Dr 30th Ave to Mccallum Way (@400’) 58.7 58.9 0.2 No Date Palm Dr 30th Ave to Mccallum Way (@670’) 56.4 56.7 0.3 No Rosemont Ave Date Palm to Sierra (@50’) 61.0 61.4 0.4 No Notes:
1 Exterior noise levels calculated at 5 feet above ground level. 2Noise levels calculated from centerline of subject roadway.
On-site Traffic Noise
Traffic noise from the local roadway network was evaluated and compared to the City’s Land Use Compatibility Matrix (Table V-2 from Geneal Plan / Noise Element). Multi-family residential is conditionally acceptable at a level up to 70 dBA CNEL. Opening Plus Project traffic noise projections show that the traffic noise contour for 70 dBA CNEL will reach up to 88 feet from the Date Palm centerline. As shown in Exhibit G of Appendix F, the proposed residential structures are located as close as 85 feet away from Date Palm Drive centerline and fall within the 70 to 65 dBA CNEL contour and are located within the conditionally acceptable region for multiple-family residential. Therefore, the residents of units located along Date Palm will not experience exterior noise levels in excess of City standards, and impacts will be less than significant.
Interior Noise Levels
In order to determine whether interior noise levels within the Project units would be consistent with City standards, the future interior noise level was calculated for the sensitive receptor locations using a typical “windows open” and “windows closed” condition. A “windows open” condition assumes 12 dBA of noise attenuation from the exterior noise level. A “windows closed” condition” assumes 20 dBA of noise attenuation from the exterior noise level.
As shown in Table 7 of Appendix F, the interior noise level will be 58 dBA with the windows open and 45 dBA CNEL with the windows closed. To meet the interior 45 dBA standard a “windows closed” condition is required. The windows and sliding glass doors directly facing Date Palm Drive will require a minimum Sound Transmission Class (STC) rating of 30 for the 1st and 2nd floors. A “windows closed” condition simply means that in order to achieve a 45 dBA CNEL interior noise level, the windows must be closed, that mechanical ventilation must be provided and does not mean the windows must be fixed. The Project is designed to meet the Title 24 of the CBC; therefore, the standard construction assembly and techniques should suffice to meet the interior noise requirements.
However, in order to assure that the interior noise standard of 45 dBA consistent with the Land Use Compatibility Matrix is met, Mitigation Measure NOI-1 is required. It mandates that the developer provide the City a study to verify the Project’s window assemblies would achieve the interior 45 dBA interior noise standard, specifically for the apartments along Date Palm Drive, prior to issuance of grading permits. Implementation of Mitigation Measure NOI-1 would reduce impacts to less than significant levels.
The Wren Multiple-Family Development Project Initial Study 79 October 2024
b) Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed Project will not generate excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels. According to the vibration analysis contained in Appendix F, at a distance of 320 feet, a large bulldozer would yield a worst-case 0.005 PPV (in/sec) which below the threshold of 0.30 in/sec PPV established by Chapter 9.86 of the municipal code for the perception of vibration at offsite locations. The impact is less than significant, and no mitigation is required.
c) No Impact. The Palm Springs International Airport (PSP) is approximately 2.5 miles east of the Project Site and outside of existing and modeled future airport noise contours. Therefore, no impacts would occur, and no mitigation measures are required.
General Plan Amendment Analysis: The noise a commercial project could generate cannot be determined without a specific project. A Noise Impact Analysis was prepared for the 2007 Uptown Village Project, which is on file with the City. Project-related mitigation measures were adopted based on that type of project proposed for commercial use. The noise study prepared for the Proposed Project also identified that there would be a less than significant impact from the noise from the residential use and created a specific mitigation measure to protect indoor noise from a portion of the apartment complex. A commercial project would be constructed on the same Project Site as the Proposed Project, therefore, criteria c would be “no impact,” the same as the Proposed Project. Therefore, overall, there would be a less than significant impact to the approval of a GPA to convert the property from commercial to residential uses.
Mitigation Measures:
NOI-1 Consistent with the Land Use Compatibility Matrix and prior to issuance of grading permit, a detailed sound attenuation study is necessary to verify the Project will achieve a minimum 25 dBA interior noise reduction, specifically for apartment homes located adjacent to Date Palm Drive.
Mitigation Monitoring:
NOI-A: Provide detailed sound attenuation study to the City’s Building Department to verify the Project will achieve a minimum 25 dBA interior noise reduction, specifically for apartment homes located adjacent to Date Palm Drive prior to issuance of the grading permit.
Responsible Parties: Project applicant, Building Department.
The Wren Multiple-Family Development Project Initial Study 80 October 2024
XIV. POPULATION AND HOUSING
Would the Project:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a) Induce substantial unplanned population
growth in an area, either directly (for
example, by proposing new homes and
businesses) or indirectly (for example,
through extension of roads or other
infrastructure)?
✓
b) Displace substantial numbers of existing
people or housing, necessitating the
construction of replacement housing
elsewhere?
✓
Sources: City of Cathedral City 2040 General Plan; City of Cathedral City General Plan Update DEIR, 2019; 2020-2045 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS), Appendix: Demographics & Growth Forecast, Table 11, Southern California Association of Governments, December 2015; California Department of Finance, City/County Population and Housing Estimates, 2021; Project materials.
Environmental Setting
According to Cathedral City’s General Plan, Cathedral City is the second most populous city in the Coachella Valley. Between 2000 and 2010, its population grew 20%, from 42,647 to 51,200. The 2018 population estimate was 54,466. The largest population segment was 25 to 34 years old, closely followed by the 45–54-year-old group and 35–44-year-old group. The median age is 37.3 years. Population ethnicity is predominantly “white” (76.9%). An estimated 59.4% identify themselves as Hispanic or Latino of any race. The Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) forecasts that the City’s population would be 68,100 in 2040. The US Census identified the City’s population as of 2020 was 51,500. The City’s General Plan EIR identified the City could have as many as 159,998 residents by 2040, but recognized that growth may occur slower and may not reach the projected buildout levels until well after 2040.
The City’s General Plan EIR identified that in 2018 there were 21,219 dwelling units in Cathedral City, the majority (11,842 units or 55.8%) of which are in the Low Density Residential land use category.
Buildout of the General Plan land use plan is projected to add 33,396 new units. Therefore, at General Plan buildout, there could be a total of approximately 54,615 dwelling units. This represents a 157% increase over the City’s existing housing supply. At buildout, the two land use categories having the most dwelling units would be Mixed Use-Urban (18,194 units or 33.3%) and Low Density Residential (14,415 units or 26.4%).
Discussion of Impacts
a) Less Than Significant Impact. Although the Project proposes 204 new apartment homes and a road extension, the Project would not substantially induce unplanned population. The 2010 Census reported that the average household size for renter-occupied units was 3.29 persons. This exceeds the Project’s design occupancy for the 48 units that are only 1 bedroom. However, since the Project includes a mix of units, including 2 and 3 bedroom units that would likely house more than 3 people, the use of the City’s average household size is appropriate, and the Project could contribute a population increase of 671 people, representing approximately 0.98 percent of the City’s projected population by SCAG in 2040, or 1.3 percent of the City’s 2020 population according to the Census.
The Wren Multiple-Family Development Project Initial Study 81 October 2024
The Project provides for approximately 19.46 dwelling units per acre, which would be classified as a medium-high density development. The City’s General Plan EIR identified that the City anticipates approximately 323 new medium-high density residential units which represents approximately 0.59 percent of the City’s total housing units8. The addition of 204 units would increase the City’s medium high density housing units to 527 units, representing 0.96 percent of the City’s housing units. It is unknown if the new housing units would be occupied by new residents moving into Cathedral City or existing residents, due to housing needs or generational trends, such as younger residents moving out of family homes.
The City’s General Plan EIR identified that the combined Mixed-Use-Urban, Mixed-UseNeighborhood, High Density Residential and Medium High Density Residential would result in 24,323 multi-family units, or 4.5 percent of the City’s total housing stock. The City’s General Plan EIR noted that these 24,323 units would be developed at densities ranging from 11 to 45 units per acre. The City’s General Plan EIR stated that the City’s mix of densities demonstrates that the City can provide a substantial number of future residential units. The Project provides a density of 19.46 dwelling units, therefore, the Project is consistent with the densities identified by the City.
Additionally, Rosemount Road would be constructed from its existing dead end in the residential neighborhood to the east to Date Palm Drive on the west and provide the main access point for the Proposed Project. The road extension would not in of itself induce additional population as the road extension would serve the Proposed Project as well as allow for alternative ingress and egress to an existing established neighborhood.
The City’s General Plan estimated a significant population increase, along with the provision of housing for the population increase. The 671 persons potentially generated by the Project is not significant considering the City’s General Plan estimate of as many as 159,998 residents by 2040.
Therefore, because this Project is a 204-home apartment complex designed to provide for existing and future residents to meet the City’s housing supply, the impact associated with unplanned growth would be less than significant.
b) No Impact. The site of the proposed Project is currently undeveloped and vacant. No persons or existing community is present. Therefore, the Project would not displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere, and no impact will occur.
General Plan Amendment Analysis. Refer to the narrative above that identifies the projections for commercial and residential land uses and population. Therefore, overall, there would be a less than significant impact to the approval of a GPA to convert the property from commercial to residential uses.
Mitigation Measures:
None required.
Monitoring:
None required.
8 City of Cathedral City Draft General Plan Environmental Impact Report (SCH #2018081012), July 15, 2019, prepared by Terra Nova, Table 2.14-4, Projected Housing Units, at General Plan Buildout The Wren Multiple-Family Development Project Initial Study 82 October 2024
XV. PUBLIC SERVICES
Would the Project result in substantial
adverse physical impacts associated with the
provision of new or physically altered
governmental facilities, need for new or
physically altered governmental facilities, the
construction of which could cause significant
environmental impacts, in order to maintain
acceptable service ratios, response times or
other performance objectives for any of the
public services:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Fire protection? ✓
Police protection? ✓
Schools? ✓
Parks? ✓
Other public facilities? ✓
Sources: City of Cathedral City 2040 General Plan; City of Cathedral City General Plan Update DEIR, 2019; Google Earth Pro.
Environmental Setting
Public services include fire protection, police protection, schools, library services, and parks.
Fire Protection Services – The City of Cathedral City operates its own fire and emergency medical services department, including ambulances. The closest fire station to the Project Site is located at 32100 Desert Vista Road, approximately 0.9 mile southwest of the Project site. Fire Department staff includes 43 sworn fire personnel (42 firefighters and 1 Fire Chief), including 14 on-duty 24/7/365, 2 administrative personnel and 1 full-time fire inspector. This equates to 0.77 firefighters to every 1,000 residents.
Police Services - The Cathedral City Police Department was created in 1984 and is located in the Civic Center at 68700 Avenida Lalo Guerrero. The Department is staffed by 52 sworn officers, 35 non-sworn support and administrative personnel, and 6 reserve officers. Police vehicles include 38 marked and approximately 22 unmarked cars.
Schools - The Palm Springs Unified School District (PSUSD) provides kindergarten through 12th grade public educational services and facilities to Cathedral City and other communities in the western Coachella Valley. In 2019, PSUSD schools enrolled approximately 22,496 students in 28 schools and in independent study programs. PSUSD operates nine schools within Cathedral City, including five elementary, two middle, one high, and one continuation high school.
Libraries - The Cathedral City Public Library is a branch of the Riverside County Library System and is located at 33520 Date Palm Drive. The library opened in 1996 and consists of a 20,000 square foot facility containing approximately 70,000 volumes. It offers a full range of community programs and services, including youth activities, computer facilities and workshops, literacy programs, a community meeting room, and a comprehensive HIV/AIDS information center. The library also offers “English as a Second Language” courses, has a speaker series, family story-time program, a book club, meditation programs and others. “Friends of the Library” provides volunteer services and operates a bookstore within the library.
The Wren Multiple-Family Development Project Initial Study 83 October 2024
Parks – The nearest park to the Project Site is Century Park, a 7-acre park that provides a ball field, tennis court, and tot lot, as well as restrooms and wi-fi provided by Spectrum. Picnic amenities are provided in the form of shade structures with tables and BBQ facilities. It is along the eastern edge of Cathedral City at the intersection of Century Park Drive and Da Vall Drive, approximately one mile north of Ramon Road.
Discussion of Impacts
Fire Protection:
Less Than Significant Impact. Development of the Proposed Project consists of an apartment complex that contains a mix of unit sizes, parking, common recreational facilities and landscaping. The facility may increase the number of fire or emergency services calls.
Additionally, the Proposed Project is required to comply with the most current adopted fire, building, and electrical codes and nationally recognized fire and life safety standards. Compliance with these codes and standards would be enforced through the City’s building plan check process.
The development of this Project will be offset by the payment of the City of Cathedral City’s Development Impact Fee for Fire Facilities, which currently stands at $0.95 per square foot, which would also assist the City in mitigating potential Project impacts. Therefore, potential impacts associated with fire protection would be less than significant and no mitigation would be required.
Police Protection:
Less Than Significant Impact. Typically, impacts on police services are analyzed based on increases in permanent residents from projects involving residential developments. The Proposed Project could generate 671 additional persons, or add an additional 0.98 percent to the City’s estimated population, and could generate a typical range of police service calls, such as burglaries or thefts and disturbances.
Development of the Project Site would not result in the need for new or physically altered police protection facilities. The development of this Project will be offset by the payment of the City of Cathedral City’s Development Impact Fee for Police Facilities, which currently stands at $0.66 per square foot, which would also assist the City in mitigating potential Project impacts. Therefore, potential impacts associated with police protection would be less than significant and no mitigation would be required.
Schools:
Less Than Significant Impact. The enrollment of the School District in school year 2021/2022 was 21,219 students, according to the PSUSD report for its developer impact fee (Fee Study)9. According to Table 1 of the Fee Study, the School District's student enrollment exceeds facilities capacity at the middle school level while facilities capacity exceeds student enrollment at the elementary and high school levels in school year 2021/2022. The Fee Study identified that the PSUSD would need to construct two new elementary schools, two new middle schools and one new high school by 2035 to accommodate student 9 Residential and Commercial/Industrial Development School Fee Justification Study, Palm Springs Unified School District, prepared by Cooperative Strategies, March 31, 2022.
The Wren Multiple-Family Development Project Initial Study 84 October 2024
growth in its service area. Table 11: Project Student Generation Rate identifies the student generation rate for the schools served by the Project in accordance with the PSUSD’s Fee Study.
Table 11: Project Student Generation Rate
Grade
Level Assigned School
School
Enrollment
PSUSD Generation Rate (Multifamily
Attached Units
Project Student
Generation
based on 204
units
K-5 Sunny Sands Elementary School 684 0.1036 21
6-8 James Workman Middle School 1028 0.0483 10
9-12 Rancho Mirage High School 1464 0.0765 16
Total Projected Student Population 47
Note: Data from PSUSD Fee Study
The Proposed Project would be required to pay State mandated development impact fees to off-set impacts to schools. Therefore, potential impacts associated with schools would be less than significant and no mitigation would be required.
Parks/Other public facilities:
Less Than Significant Impact. The city will need approximately 478 acres of parkland to meet the demand in the future. The proposed Project will have on-site amenities such as a pool, spa, and fitness gym, and provide over 2 acres of open space for residents’ recreational needs The development of this Project will be offset by the payment of the City of Cathedral City’s Development Impact Fee for Park Facilities, which currently stands at $4.65 per square foot, which would also assist the City in mitigating potential Project impacts. Therefore, Project-related impacts to park facilities are expected to be less than significant.
General Plan Amendment Analysis. Commercial development would also require additional needs for public services, similar to the Proposed Project. Commercial development would also require the payment of developer impact fees to off-set potential impacts, similar to the Proposed Project. Therefore, overall, there would be a less than significant impact to the approval of a GPA to convert the property from commercial to residential uses.
Mitigation Measures:
None required.
Monitoring:
None required.
The Wren Multiple-Family Development Project Initial Study 85 October 2024
XVI. RECREATION
Would the Project:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a) Would the Project increase the use of
existing neighborhood and regional parks or
other recreational facilities such that
substantial physical deterioration of the
facility would occur or be accelerated?
✓
b) Does the Project include recreational
facilities or require the construction or
expansion of recreational facilities which
might have an adverse physical effect on the
environment?
✓
Sources: City of Cathedral City 2040 General Plan; City of Cathedral City General Plan Update DEIR, 2019; Google Earth Pro.
Environmental Setting
The City of Cathedral City is home to the Boys & Girls Club which operates a community center that offers a variety of recreational and educational opportunities to the City’s residents. The center includes rooms for classes, a pool table and other games, a fully equipped kitchen, bathroom facilities and a gated patio area. The Center offers an off-track program for children 6-12 years of age, Monday through Friday.
The off-track program offers a structured environment for activities such as arts and crafts, sports, games, field trips and movies. The Center also offers an after-school camp that features similar activities. The Community Center also holds a variety of classes for adults, as well as rented space for parties or gatherings.
Discussion of Impacts
a, b) Less than Significant Impact. The proposed Project will not substantially increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated. The Proposed Project will generate an estimated increase in population of approximately 671 persons. The proposed Project will have a common area that includes a pool, BBQ area and dog park. The nearest City park to the proposed Project Site is Century Park, located approximately 0.85 mile east of the Project Site.
In addition, there are a number of recreational facilities open to the general public including the community center, Boys and Girls Club, Big League Dreams Sports Park, and public golf courses that provide recreational opportunities for the community.
The development of this Project will be offset by the payment of the City of Cathedral City’s Development Impact Fee for Park Facilities which would also assist the City in mitigating potential Project impacts. With the proposed Project being required to pay a development impact fee for parks, impacts recreational facilities will be less than significant.
General Plan Amendment Analysis. The potential impacts of commercial development on regional and local parks is unknown without a specific project to compare it to the Proposed Project.
Commercial development at the Project Site would not in of itself increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated. However, if the commercial establishment contains restaurant or fast food, for example, patrons of the establishment may take to food to enjoy at the same parks that are closest the Project Site. Or, a family gathering may The Wren Multiple-Family Development Project Initial Study 86 October 2024
purchase party goods from a commercial establishment within the commercial center and utilize a local park in which to hold an event. Commercial development would also require the payment of developer impact fees to off-set potential impacts, similar to the Proposed Project. Therefore, overall, there would be a less than significant impact to the approval of a GPA to convert the property from commercial to residential uses.
Mitigation Measures:
None required.
Monitoring:
None required
The Wren Multiple-Family Development Project Initial Study 87 October 2024
XVII. TRANSPORTATION
Would the Project:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a) Conflict with a program, plan, ordinance or
policy addressing the circulation system,
including transit, roadway, bicycle and
pedestrian facilities?
✓
b) Would the project conflict or be
inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines section
15064.3, subdivision (b)?
✓
c) Substantially increase hazards due to a
geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or
dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses
(e.g., farm equipment)?
✓
d) Result in inadequate emergency access? ✓
Sources: City of Cathedral City 2040 General Plan; City of Cathedral City General Plan Update DEIR, 2019; The Wren Project Transportation Analysis, prepared by Integrated Engineering Group, July 2024 (Appendix G-1); Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Analysis, The Wren Residential Development, Cathedral City, CA, prepared by General Technologies and Solutions, June 3, 2024 (Appendix G-2); Project materials; Google Earth Pro.
Environmental Setting
Proposed Project
The proposed Project consists of a 204-apartment home complex. The Project would be served by one main point of access and one secondary access, both of which would be gated.
Under existing conditions, Rosemount Road does not extend to Date Palm Drive. The Project would construct Rosemount Road from its eastern terminus in the single-family residential subdivision to Date Palm Drive as a two-lane roadway with two, 20-foot drive lanes, and curb and gutter and sidewalks on both sides, designed to City standards.
The main entrance to the Project would be from Rosemount Road with the 24-foot-wide entry driveway and a 20-foot-wide exit driveway separated by a landscaped median.
The secondary ingress/egress from the complex is proposed on the northern boundary via a 25-foot-wide all access driveway. This secondary ingress/egress driveway would connect to an interior drive aisle within the Northgate Church property (APN 670-110-042) to be constructed prior to Project occupancy.
The new roadway consists of developing the existing dirt access roads that are along the church property’s retention basin that serves the church grounds. These new drive aisles would tie into the church’s existing interior drive aisle system that provides direct access to both Date Palm Drive to the west and 30th Avenue to the north.
Therefore, access to the Project Site will be provided via one proposed driveway along the new Rosemount Road extension to access Date Palm Drive to the west of the Project Site as well as the opportunity to use Date Palm Drive and 30th Avenue to the north of the Project Site. Additionally, the Project will construct a traffic signal at the new intersection of Rosemount Road and Date Palm Drive.
The Wren Multiple-Family Development Project Initial Study 88 October 2024
City of Cathedral City’s General Plan Circulation and Mobility Element The Circulation and Mobility Element (CME) of the City of Cathedral City’s General Plan is an infrastructure and mobility plan that provides connectivity between the various existing and planned land uses of the City and the region and addresses the dynamic access issues associated with the mix of residential, employment, commercial, industrial and institutional uses in the community. It also sets forth goals, policies, programs and standards that correlate the City’s transportation system with the types, intensities and locations of land uses within the City.
Transit
The SunLine Transit Agency (STA) is the transit agency servicing Cathedral City. Currently, STA operates Route 4 within the vicinity of the Project Site. Route 4 operates seven days a week and connects to Palm Springs west of the site and Palm Desert to the east. Weekday and weekend service frequency is 60 minutes. Bus stops for Route 4 are currently located within 350 ft of the site at the northeast corner of the Date Palm Drive and McCallum Way intersection for northbound service and at the southwest corner for southbound service. Pedestrian accessibility and connectivity from the Project Site to these bus stops is provided along the east side of Date Palm Drive with signalized crossings at the intersection where the bus stops are located The CME states that “To be effective, higher density residential development should be planned in the vicinity of bus routes and must be affordable and appealing to those in the service and retail industries that are more likely to take advantage of and benefit from efficient transit service.” CME Goal 2, Policy 11 addresses the City’s transit programs. Policy 11 states:
On an ongoing basis, the City shall confer and coordinate with the SunLine Transit Agency on the expansion of routes, facilities, services and ridership especially in congested areas and those with high levels of employment and commercial services, and encourage the use of most energy efficient and least polluting transportation technologies.
Roadways
Date Palm Drive functions as a divided 6-lane roadway within the Project area from McCallum Way to 30th Avenue. The posted speed limit is 45 miles per hour. Per the CME, Date Palm Drive is at its buildout roadway classification of an arterial highway.
The CME states: “To the greatest extent practicable, local streets should serve primarily local neighborhoods” and that “The roadway network should facilitate arterial use while protecting local neighborhoods from cut through and other non-local traffic.” This is reflected in the CME Goal 2 and Policy 1, which states:
Goal 2: A City-wide and neighborhood-specific transportation system that is responsive to, and which implements the New Urbanism principles of community design, through land use and transportation planning.
Policy 1: The City circulation and mobility network shall be planned and developed to assure the provision of safe and efficient vehicular, pedestrian, bicycle and LSEV access to all parts of the community, effectively linking residents and visitors to the full range of residential, employment, shopping, and recreational land uses.
The Wren Multiple-Family Development Project Initial Study 89 October 2024
CME Goal 2, Policy 3 identifies an acceptable level for traffic flow on city streets, known as “level of service” which is accomplished by implementation of various programs to be implemented for roadway design standards. Policy 3 states:
The City shall assure that the current and future City roadway segments and intersections maintain minimum operating standards that do not exceed Level-of-Service (LOS) “D” during peak hours of traffic.
Along roadway segments and intersections where LOS D may not be achievable after applying all practicable measures, the City shall find LOS “E” during peak hours to be provisionally acceptable.
CME Goal 2, Policy 5 addresses the City’s desire to encourage developers to make a contribution to the city’s street network and includes various programs that discuss implementation strategies. Policy 5 states:
Mixed-use and other integrated development plans may propose the construction of public and/or private streets that conform with the New Urbanism and Complete Streets design principles, assuming sufficient technical support to argue for their safe and efficient use is provided, and the concerns of all public service and protection providers are satisfied.
Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities
Pedestrian crosswalks are generally provided at signalized intersections along Date Palm Drive with sidewalks on the west side from McCallum Way to 30th Avenue and on the east side from the Project limits to McCallum Way.
There are no existing bicycle facilities along Date Palm Drive. However, the CME proposes a Class I offroad shared bike and pedestrian trail along Date Palm Drive. CME Goal 2, Policy 2 identifies the City’s desire relative to development of bicycle and pedestrian facilities, along with various programs that discuss implementation strategies. Policy 2 states:
Transit stops and pedestrian, bicycle and LSEV paths shall be sited in conformance with the General Plan roadway classifications and the City Active Transportation Plan. Standards and guidelines shall be applied in a manner that encourages the use of alternatives modes of transportation and provides safe, convenient access to commercial and employment centers, as well as institutional and recreational land uses.
Level of Service
Although the CME Goal 2, Policy 3 identifies an acceptable LOS within the City, Senate Bill 743, adopted in 2013, added section 21099 to the Public Resources Code, which states that automobile delay, as described by level of service or similar measures of vehicular capacity or traffic congestion, shall not be considered a significant impact on the environment. Essentially a project’s environmental impacts can no longer focus on vehicle delay at street intersections or on roadway segments but must use the miles a vehicle must travel between a dwelling and commerce, recreation and/or work. The intent of this shift in methodology is to encourage different land use and transportation decisions to reduce greenhouse gas emission, support in-fill development and improve public health through active transportation.
Transportation Study
A Transportation Study (Appendix G-1) was prepared for the Project to document potential traffic deficiencies in accordance with the City’s General Plan metrics.
The Wren Multiple-Family Development Project Initial Study 90 October 2024
Trip Generation/Level of Service
The Project trip generation was calculated using the ITE Trip Generation Manual (11th Edition). It is estimated that the Project will generate 1,375 total daily trips, 81 AM peak hour trips and 104 PM peak hour trips. Project trip distribution and assignment were developed, in coordination with the Cathedral City staff, based on the land use characteristics of the Project and surrounding area, existing travel patterns within the study area, anticipated travel patterns to and from the Project Site, and approved projects located in the vicinity of the Project Site. Analysis scenarios and study area were then established in coordination with City staff to determine the potential Project deficiencies on the transportation network.
The analysis scenarios included:
• Existing Conditions Year 2023
• Project Completion Year 2025 (Existing plus Ambient plus Project) • Cumulative Year 2025 (Existing plus Ambient plus Cumulative plus Project) • Horizon Year 2045 No Project Conditions
• Horizon Year Plus Project Conditions
Study area intersections included:
• Date Palm Drive and McCallum Way
• Date Palm Drive and Rosemount Road
• Date Palm Drive and 30th Avenue
Study roadway segments included:
• Date Palm Drive, McCallum Way to Rosemount Road
• Date Palm Drive, Rosemount Road to 30th Avenue
The Transportation Study identified that while these intersections functioned within the City’s LOS standard even with pending development, a new traffic signal at Rosemount Road and Date Palm Drive was warranted to provide a level of safety for the Rosemount/Date Palm intersection turning movements.
Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Analysis
Section 15064.3, subdivision (b)(1) of the CEQA Guidelines requires a determination as to whether the Project will result in a substantial increase in vehicle miles traveled (VMT). A VMT analysis (Appendix G-2) was prepared to determine potential Project impacts to transportation.
Riverside County adopted the Transportation Analysis Guidelines for Level of Service, Vehicle Miles Traveled (December 2020) to be compliant with CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3, subdivision (b) and provide screening criteria and methodology for vehicle miles traveled (VMT) analysis.
Cathedral City utilizes the methodology and significance threshold criteria identified in the County of Riverside Transportation Analysis (TA) Guidelines for Level of Service (LOS) and Vehicle Miles Traveled, December 2020 (Guidelines).
The guidelines include several Project screening criteria which were reviewed for the Project evaluation.
The Project includes residential land uses only. Therefore, the Project use type was assessed with screening criteria established in the guidelines as below:
The Wren Multiple-Family Development Project Initial Study 91 October 2024
• Small Projects
• Projects Near High Quality Transit
• Local-serving Retail
• Affordable Housing
• Local Essential Service
• Map-based Screening
The Project did not meet the screening criteria wherein the Project would not have to prepare a detailed VMT analysis. Therefore, a detailed VMT analysis was conducted using RIVCOM 4.01 as recommended in the Guidelines. The VMT analysis is provided in Appendix G-2.
The Guidelines recommend use of total home-based VMT per capita as the VMT metric to evaluate residential land uses. The home-based VMT is computed by using production VMT for all of the HomeBased trip purposes. According to the Guidelines, a project would constitute a significant impact if the project VMT per capita is higher than the Riverside Countywide residential VMT per capita.
Discussion of Impacts
a) Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed Project will not conflict with a program, plan, ordinance, or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities as follows:
Transit: The Project is located in the vicinity of existing bus stops. The Project does not interfere with the development of future bus stops along Date Palm Drive. Therefore, the Project is consistent with the General Plan’s vision for transit.
Roadway: Under existing conditions, Rosemount Road does not extend to Date Palm Drive. The Project will facilitate the completion of two new interior drive aisles within the Northgate Church to the north. These new drive aisles will connect to the Northgate Church’s existing driveways; one driveway connects to 30th Avenue, which the City’s General Plan identifies as a Secondary Highway, and the other to Date Palm Drive, which the City’s General Plan identifies as an Arterial Highway. Rosemount Road is not designated as a General Plan roadway in the City’s General Plan. Construction of Rosemount Road between the residential subdivision to the east to Date Palm Drive will offer a connection from the Project Site to Date Palm Drive, while also offering residents to the east a direct connection to Date Palm Drive. Therefore, completion of Rosemount Road would fulfill the goals and policies of the General Plan’s CME by offering a direct link for residents to the City’s main circulation roadways to better access residential, employment, shopping and recreational uses. Therefore, the Project is consistent with the General Plan’s vision, goals and policies related to roadway mobility.
Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities: Rosemount Road would be constructed to City standards, which require curb and gutter and pedestrian sidewalks. Date Palm Drive is designated by the City’s General Plan as a future on-street Class II bike facility. The Project will be required to install sidewalk along its frontage on Date Palm. Improvements to the Date Palm Drive/Rosemount Road intersection are designed in coordination with the City to facilitate this improvement should the City develop this in the future. Therefore, the Project is consistent with the General Plan vision for bicycle and pedestrian facilities.
The Wren Multiple-Family Development Project Initial Study 92 October 2024
Level of Service: The Transportation Analysis in Appendix G-1 estimated that the Project would generate 1,375 total daily trips, 81 AM peak hour trips and 104 PM peak hour trips. Table 6-2 of the Transportation Analysis identified that the intersections and roadways studied would operate LOS C or C/D, with the Project, and cumulative projects through the horizon year 2045. The LOS of C or C/D is acceptable under the City’s LOS standard of D or higher.
However, several projects are planned for the immediate vicinity of the Project that would increase usage of the Date Palm Drive/Rosemount Road intersection to more than just the Proposed Project.
The Traffic Analysis in Appendix G-1 accounted for the traffic from these future projects and determined that the intersection would still function within the City’s acceptable LOS standard.
However, the City determined that a traffic signal is required at the intersection of Rosemount Road and Date Palm Drive to increase safety of the intersection, which is consistent with the goals and policies of the City’s CME. Per the agreement with the City, the Project and the other planned projects in the immediate vicinity would contribute a fair share of funding to fully fund the intersection improvements. However, because The Project is planned to be constructed prior to the other projects in the immediate vicinity, The Project includes installation of the traffic signal and other intersection modifications per City direction to facilitate the signal. Other projects to be constructed later would construct the other City-identified improvements to complete the intersection design as intended by the City. Improvements to be completed by others include widening Date Palm Drive to accommodate dedicated turn pockets.
Therefore, the Project is consistent with the City’s LOS standards and CME goals and policies.
Impacts would be less than significant.
With the installation of these improvements, and payment of development impacts fees and Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF), the proposed Project is anticipated to mitigate traffic impacts to a less than significant level.
General Plan Amendment Analysis. A commercial project’s traffic impacts would be assessed, similar to the requirement of the Proposed Project. A commercial project proposed for the Project Site would also be required to build out Rosemount Road for access, between Date Palm Road and the existing terminus at Stella Place. It is anticipated that the City’s requirement for a signalized intersection at Date Palm Drive and Rosemount Road would also be required for safety. Therefore, there would be a less than significant impact to the approval of a GPA to convert the property from commercial to residential uses.
b) Less Than Significant Impact. For the VMT analysis in Appendix G-2, the Riverside County RIVCOM4.01 socioeconomic database model was utilized, and prepared by GTS consultants. The model scenarios were updated with the proposed Project land use to calculate Project VMT both baseline (2018) and horizon year (2045) to estimate the Project’s VMT impacts. The Project VMT per capita was compared with Riverside Countywide VMT per capita for Project evaluation as the City of Cathedral City has yet to adopt SB743 guidelines. The RIVCOM model (Appendix G-2) identified that the Project VMT per capita is not higher than the Riverside Countywide residential VMT per capita, and therefore, the Project does not have a significant impact on VMT.
General Plan Amendment Analysis. A commercial project’s VMT would be assessed, similar to the requirement of the Proposed Project. The impact of VMT is unknown for a commercial project at the project site, but it would be expected that as a local-serving commercial development, its The Wren Multiple-Family Development Project Initial Study 93 October 2024
VMT impacts would be considered less than significant. Therefore, there would be a less than significant impact to the approval of a GPA to convert the property from commercial to residential uses.
c) Less than Significant Impact. The proposed Project will not substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature or incompatible uses. The Project occurs in an urban area where the typical mix if vehicles would include passenger vehicles and trucks and delivery trucks, which is consistent with the general area. The Project would complete Rosemount Road from the residential subdivision to the east, to Date Palm to the west, and provide a signal at Date Palm/Rosemount Road, in accordance with City standards.
The proposed Project geometric design features are consistent with the City’s traffic design standards and are not expected to substantially increase hazards due to geometric design features or incompatible uses. Proposed improvements will be safe, and impacts are expected to be less than significant.
General Plan Amendment Analysis. Any commercial project proposed for the Project Site would also need to complete Rosemount Road from the residential subdivision to the east, to Date Palm to the west, and provide a signal at Date Palm/Rosemount Road, in accordance with City standards, similar to the requirement of the Proposed Project. Any commercial project would also be required to undergo review by the City for its driveway and internal circulation design, to assure safe paths of travel within the project. Therefore, any commercial project would not increase hazards due to a geometric design. Therefore, there would be a less than significant impact to the approval of a GPA to convert the property from commercial to residential uses. d) No Impact. The proposed Project will not result in inadequate emergency access. The Project would be served by one main point of access and one secondary accessthat lead to major roadways.
Internal circulation includes fire lanes that are designed in accordance with City fire regulations.
Therefore, the proposed Project will not result in inadequate emergency access. Therefore, there will be no impact.
General Plan Amendment Analysis. Any commercial project proposed for the Project Site would also be required to have primary and secondary emergency access, similar to the Proposed Project.
Therefore, there would be no impact to the approval of a GPA to convert the property from commercial to residential uses.
Mitigation Measures:
None required.
Monitoring:
None required.
The Wren Multiple-Family Development Project Initial Study 94 October 2024
XVIII. TRIBAL CULTURAL
RESOURCES
a) Would the Project cause a substantial
adverse change in the significance of a tribal
cultural resource, defined in Public Resources
Code section 21074 as either a site, feature,
place, cultural landscape that is
geographically defined in terms of the size
and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or
object with cultural value to a California
Native American tribe, and that is:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
i) Listed or eligible for listing in the California
Register of Historical Resources, or in a local
register of historical resources as defined in
Public Resources Code section 5020.1(k), or
✓
ii) A resource determined by the lead agency,
in its discretion and supported by substantial
evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria
set forth in subdivision (c) of Public
Resources Code Section 5024.1. In applying
the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of
Public Resources Code Section 5024.1, the
lead agency shall consider the significance of
the resource to a California Native American
tribe.
✓
Sources: City of Cathedral City 2040 General Plan; City of Cathedral City General Plan Update DEIR, 2019; Project materials; Google Earth Pro; Historical/Archaeological Resources Survey Report, Assessor’s Parcel Nos. 670-110-043, -045, -048 to - 053, -055, and -056, prepared by CRM Tech., October 24, 2023 (Appendix C).
Environmental Setting
The proposed Project Site is vacant.
The Cultural Resource Investigation (Appendix C) included a request for information from the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) regarding sacred lands. The nearby Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians was also contacted by electronic mail for additional information on potential Native American cultural resources in the Project vicinity and to invite tribal participation in the upcoming archaeological fieldwork. Claritsa Duarte, Cultural Resources Analyst with the Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians (ACBCI) Historic Preservation Office, requested to review copies of all applicable cultural resource documentation, along with the presence of an approved Agua Caliente cultural resources monitor during any ground-disturbing activities.
Discussion of Impacts
i, ii) Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. The city facilitated Tribal Consultation in conformance with AB 52 and SB18. The Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians (ACBCI) responded February 26, 2024 and requested copies of any cultural resource documentation (report and site records) generated in connection with this Project; formal government to government consultation under California Assembly Bill No. 52 (AB-52); and, the presence of an approved Agua Caliente Native American Cultural Resource Monitor(s) during any ground disturbing activities (including archaeological testing and surveys). Should buried cultural deposits be encountered, the Monitor may request that destructive construction halt and the Monitor shall The Wren Multiple-Family Development Project Initial Study 95 October 2024
notify a Qualified Archaeologist (Secretary of the Interior’s Standards and Guidelines) to investigate and, if necessary, prepare a mitigation plan for submission to the State Historic Preservation Officer and the Agua Caliente Tribal Historic Preservation Office. As such, Mitigation Measure CUL-1 in Section V “Cultural Resources” is included to specifically address unanticipated tribal resources pursuant to the ACBCI.
General Plan Amendment Analysis: A proposed commercial project would be required to comply with AB52 to engage tribal consultation. Mitigation measures would be identical, since the project would occur on the same parcel of land. Therefore, there would be a less than significant impact, with the same mitigation incorporated, to the approval of a GPA to convert the property from commercial to residential uses.
Mitigation Measures:
See Section V Cultural Resources.
Monitoring:
See Section V Cultural Resources.
The Wren Multiple-Family Development Project Initial Study 96 October 2024
XIX. UTILITIES AND SERVICE
SYSTEMS
Would the Project:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a) Require or result in the relocation or
construction of new or expanded water,
wastewater treatment or storm water
drainage, electric power, natural gas, or
telecommunications facilities, the
construction or relocation of which could
cause significant environmental effects?
✓
b) Have sufficient water supplies available to
serve the project and reasonably foreseeable
future development during normal, dry and
multiple dry years?
✓
c) Result in a determination by the wastewater
treatment provider which serves or may serve
the project that it has adequate capacity to
serve the project’s projected demand in
addition to the provider’s existing
commitments?
✓
d) Generate solid waste in excess of State or
local standards, or in excess of the capacity of
local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the
attainment of solid waste reduction goals?
✓
e) Comply with federal, state, and local
management and reduction statutes and
regulations related to solid waste?
✓
Sources: City of Cathedral City 2040 General Plan; City of Cathedral City General Plan Update DEIR, 2019; Estimated Solid Waste Generation Rates by CalRecycle,
https://www2.calrecycle.ca.gov/WasteCharacterization/General/Rates, Accessed August 2022.; Google Earth Pro 7.3.2.5776.
Environmental Setting
Domestic Water –Domestic water is provided by a number of agencies which extract groundwater from deep wells and convey it to homes and businesses through extensive systems of reservoirs and distribution pipelines. However, the Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) and Desert Water Agency (DWA) are the principal domestic water providers and groundwater managers in the Coachella Valley, and both serve Cathedral City. The proposed Project Site is served by the CVWD.
Wastewater Collection and Treatment - Sewage collection and treatment services for the Project would be served by the CVWD, which also serves the cities of Rancho Mirage, Palm Desert, Indian Wells, La Quinta, as well as some unincorporated communities, including Thousand Palms, Thermal, and North Shore. CVWD operates six wastewater reclamation plants (WRP) in the Coachella Valley, with treatment capacities ranging from 0.03 to 24 million gallons per day. Three of its WRPs generate recycled wastewater used for irrigation of golf courses and landscaping. CVWD receives a combined average of 18 million gallons of wastewater per day.
The Wren Multiple-Family Development Project Initial Study 97 October 2024
Approximately 6.3 billion gallons of wastewater are treated yearly. CVWD continually increases the capacity of its wastewater reclamation facilities by constructing new treatment ponds, aeration plants and other structures. Wastewater from Cathedral City is conveyed to and treated at WRP-10 in Palm Desert, which has a design capacity of 18 million gallons per day (MGD).10 Electric Service - Electric services in the Coachella Valley are provided by Southern California Edison (SCE) and Imperial Irrigation District (IID). SCE is the electric power provider for the western Coachella Valley, including Cathedral City. The Project would be served by SCE.
Natural Gas – Southern California Gas Company (Semper Energy) provides natural gas services and facilities to the entire Coachella Valley, including Cathedral City.
Telecommunications - Frontier Communications (formerly Verizon) and Spectrum (formerly TimeWarner) provide a wide range of residential and business telecommunications services to the Coachella Valley, including telephone, cable, phone over internet protocol (FOIP), and other telecommunication services.
Cable Television - The Coachella Valley’s largest cable television service provider is Spectrum. Frontier also provides similar services through its FIOS fiber technology. Satellite service is also available through DISH and Direct TV.
Discussion of Impacts
a) Less Than Significant Impact. The Proposed Project would not require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment or storm water drainage, electric power, natural gas, or telecommunications facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects:
Water Systems Facilities
The Project’s water would be served by CVWD. Domestic water lines will be constructed throughout the Project Site to serve the buildings. The Project water lines would connect to a new water main line to be installed at the Project’s Rosemount Road driveway. The Project also includes the construction of approximately 468 feet of a new 8-inch water main in Rosemount Road, from the terminus of the existing water main at the intersection of Rosemount Road and Stella Place, to connect to an existing main line in Date Palm Drive to serve the Project.
Construction of the new main is anticipated to occur as part of the construction of Rosemount Road. Construction impacts associated with the installation of the on-site and off-site connections are expected to be confined to trenching, and related construction activities would be temporary and limited. All improvements related to water service would be completed in accordance with City and CVWD standards which would preclude any interruptions in existing service of the surrounding properties. As such, construction of the new infrastructure would not cause a significant environmental impact.
Wastewater Systems Facilities
The Project’s sewer would be served by the CVWD. Underground sewer laterals will extend from the Project’s buildings to connect to a new sewer main to be constructed in Rosemount Road at 10 Development Design Manual Coachella Valley Water District, February 2024.
The Wren Multiple-Family Development Project Initial Study 98 October 2024
the Project’s driveway. The Project will also construct approximately 165 feet of a new 8-inch sewer main in Rosemount Road, from the driveway to the terminus of the existing sewer main located at the intersection of Rosemount Road and Stella Place. Construction of the new main is anticipated to occur as part of the construction of Rosemount Road.
Construction impacts associated with the installation of the on-site and off-site connections are expected to be confined to trenching, and related construction activities would be temporary and limited. All improvements related to wastewater service would be completed in accordance with City and CVWD standards which would preclude any interruptions in existing service of the surrounding properties. Upon implementation of the Project, the Project’s wastewater would be conveyed to CVWD’s Wastewater Reclamation Plant 10 (WRP-10) in the City of Palm Desert. As such, construction of the new infrastructure would not cause a significant environmental impact.
Stormwater/Drainage
The proposed Project will also have retention basins incorporated into the development as required by the Project specific Hydrology Study, and WQMP BMPs to treat and infiltrate onsite storm water. These basins will retain the 100-year storm, as required by City standards, and will not impact off-site stormwater systems.
Electric power, natural gas, or telecommunications facilities Frontier Communications and Spectrum provide telephone, television, and internet services to the city and would also service the Project Site utilizing existing utility lines or by adding extensions to the existing lines. Southern California Edison will evaluate the Proposed Project, and size line extensions and infrastructure appropriately. Refer to the Energy section for potential energy usage.
The proposed Project will comply with the City’s standards related to water, wastewater treatment, storm water drainage, electric power, natural gas, and telecommunications facilities. Impacts will be less than significant.
General Plan Amendment Analysis: A commercial project would require similar improvements in main service pipelines, conduit and various lines, similar to the Proposed Project. Any applicant for a commercial project would also be required to work with the various utility service providers to provide service to their project, similar to the Proposed Project. Therefore, there would be a less than significant impact to the approval of a GPA to convert the property from commercial to residential uses.
b) Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed Project will have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future development during normal, dry, and multiple dry years. The Proposed Project is estimated to use approximately 80 AFY (refer to Section X. Hydrology).
According to CVRUMP, the CVWD has planned for a service population of 292,077 by 2025 but does not identify the population utilized for Cathedral City. The Proposed Project’s contribution of 671 persons represents approximately 0.2 percent of the projected service population, and therefore is not significant. As discussed in Section X. Hydrology, the RUMP identifies that commercial land uses typically consume slightly more water than multifamily residential.
The Wren Multiple-Family Development Project Initial Study 99 October 2024
Water conservation measures such as the use of drought tolerant landscaping and water efficient drip irrigation systems, and the use of low flow plumbing fixtures (toilets, faucets, showers, sinks) will help efforts to preserve water as much as possible. Consistent with the Water Conservation in Landscaping Act of 2006 (AB 1881), the city adopted, by reference, the Coachella Valley Water District Ordinance No. 1302.1. The Proposed Project will comply with this ordinance which includes xeriscaping with locally native California species and installing water-efficient and targeted irrigation systems (such as drip irrigation). In addition, the Final Landscape Plans will be reviewed by CVWD for compliance with the ordinance. Further, the City would require the Applicant to provide Will-Serve letters or a water supply commitment from the CVWD prior to issuance of grading permits, as part of its normal permit processing. Therefore, impacts will be less than significant.
General Plan Amendment Analysis: Any commercial project would also be required to provide information to the CVWD to calculate potential usage, in addition to demonstrating compliance with low water use fixtures, as with the Proposed Project. As discussed in Section X. Hydrology, a hypothetical commercial project, which would be consistent with the current zoning as planned for in the CVRUMP, was estimated to use more water than the Proposed Project. Therefore, there would be a less than significant impact to the approval of a GPA to convert the property from commercial to residential uses.
c) Less Than Significant Impact. The Proposed Project will result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project’s projected demand in addition to the provider’s existing commitments.
The Proposed Project’s wastewater generation analysis was conducted using wastewater flows provided in the CVWD Water Management Plan and the CVWD Development Design Manual.
All stormwater would be retained on site, according to the hydrology report. For comparison purposes, it is assumed that Project A would also retain 100 percent of the 100-year storm event.
CVWD estimates a peak flow factor of 200 gallons per day per dwelling unit, which can be higher during wet weather. Based on the 204 Project units, it is expected to generate 0.00002266 mgd gallons of wastewater per day, or 0.041 mgd.
WRP-10’s existing secondary wastewater treatment capacity is 18 mgd. The annual average daily flow is 10.8 mgd from the activated sludge plant. The Project’s wastewater flow would increase the existing average annual flow by 0.041 mgd. This increase is within WRP-10’s treatment capacity. Approximately 60 percent of the wastewater received at this plant receives tertiary treatment for reuse. This water is then used for golf course irrigation. The Project’s net estimated daily wastewater generation would remain under the maximum 18 mgd.
Therefore, existing wastewater treatment facilities would have sufficient capacities to accommodate wastewater generated by the Project. The Project would result in determination by the wastewater treatment provider, CVWD, that it has adequate capacity to serve the project’s projected demand in addition to the providers existing commitments. Impacts would be less than significant.
The Wren Multiple-Family Development Project Initial Study 100 October 2024
Additionally, the City would require the Applicant to provide a “will serve” letter or a commitment to serve the Project prior to issuance of the grading permit as part of its procedures. The impacts would be less than significant.
General Plan Amendment Analysis: As described above, a commercial project of approximately 172,000 square feet with a mix of retail uses would be possible on the Project site.
Assuming an EDU of 65, and a standard gpd rate of 200, the daily wastewater generated by a commercial project would be 13,000 gpd, or0.013 mgd. This would be within the CVWD’s treatment ability. As with the Proposed Project, the City would require the Applicant to provide “will serve” or commitment letters from CVWD. Therefore, there would be a less than significant impact to the approval of a GPA to convert the property from commercial to residential uses. d, e) Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed Project will not generate solid waste in excess of State or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals. During the construction, the proposed Project will generate waste that will need to be transported to local landfills by Burrtec, the City’s franchised waste hauler.
The City’s General Plan states that Burrtec collects solid waste from its service area and transfers it to the Edom Hill Transfer Station in northern Cathedral City. Edom Hill is permitted to receive a maximum of 3,500 tons of waste per day. From Edom Hill, waste is trucked to Lamb Canyon Sanitary Landfill in Beaumont, Badlands Landfill in Moreno Valley, or El Sobrante Landfill in Corona. These landfills are owned and operated by Riverside County and have a combined remaining capacity of approximately 171 million cubic yards.
Based on CalReycle’s waste generation rates for multifamily units (4 pounds per dwelling unit per day), and the Proposed Project’s 204 units, the Proposed Project is estimated to generate approximately 0.48 cubic yards per day, or approximately 175 cubic yards (245 tons) annually. or 122 tons per year after 50 percent diversion.
General Plan Amendment Analysis: The CalRecycle waste generation rates for commercial projects vary by type, such has retail, hotel, or office. Using a typical general commercial retail operation, the CalRecycle rate could be 4.75 pounds per employee per day. 11 Assuming that the
commercial project would be a shopping center that would employ a about 340 persons (1 employee per 500 square feet of space), the potential waste generation would be approximately 1,615 pounds per day, or approximately 0.96 cubic yards per day, which would be substantially greater than the Proposed Project. Therefore, the GPA would result in a reduction in potential impacts associated with solid waste generation.
General Plan Amendment Analysis: Refer to the discussion above regarding generation of commercial and residential waste. Therefore, there would be a less than significant impact to the approval of a GPA to convert the property from commercial to residential uses.
Mitigation Measures:
None required.
Monitoring:
None required.
11 Estimated Solid Waste Generation Rates, https://www2.calrecycle.ca.gov/WasteCharacterization/General/Rates, as accessed 9/5/24.
The Wren Multiple-Family Development Project Initial Study 101 October 2024
XX. WILDFIRE
If located in or near state responsibility
areas or lands classified as very high fire
hazard severity zones, would the project:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a) Substantially impair an adopted emergency
response plan or emergency evacuation plan? ✓
b) Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other
factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby
expose project occupants to, pollutant
concentrations from a wildfire or the
uncontrolled spread of a wildfire?
✓
c) Require the installation or maintenance of
associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel
breaks, emergency water sources, power lines
or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk
or that may result in temporary or ongoing
impacts to the environment?
✓
d) Expose people or structures to significant
risks, including downslope or downstream
flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff,
post-fire slope instability, or drainage changes?
✓
Sources: City of Cathedral City 2040 General Plan; City of Cathedral City General Plan Update DEIR, 2019; CalFire’s Fire and Resource Assessment Program (FRAP) Maps, accessed August 2022; Project materials; Google Earth Pro.
Environmental Setting
Wildfire refers to non-structural fires, typically occurring within vegetation in or around undeveloped areas. It is important to evaluate the potential for developed/urban areas to be impacted by wildfires due to spread. To accomplish this the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (Cal Fire) has generated maps that indicate the various fire hazard Severity Zones (FHSZ). The proposed Project is within a Local Responsibility Area (LRA) and is not designated a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone (VHFHSZ).
Discussion of Impacts
a) No Impact. The Proposed Project would not substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan. While the proposed Project Site is located in a Local Responsibility Area Fire Zone, it is not designated as a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone (VHFHSZ). The Project proposes no alteration to the City’s existing street grid and will have no impact on emergency operations due to wildfire, because no hazard areas occur on or in the vicinity of the Project Site, as shown in Exhibit S-7 of the General Plan. b) No Impact. The Proposed Project is located in an urban area with flat topography. There are no slopes such that the prevailing winds, and other factors, would exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose Project Site occupants to pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire. There would be no impact. c) No Impact. The proposed Project will not exacerbate fire risks as it is not designated as a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone (VHFHSZ) and will not require the installation or maintenance The Wren Multiple-Family Development Project Initial Study 102 October 2024
of associated infrastructure. The Proposed Project includes infrastructure appropriate for an urban environment, such as fire access lanes and adequate driveway width as approved by the City Fire Department. There would be no impact.
d) No Impact. The Proposed Project exists within an urban environment, and does not contain, nor is it near slopes that would expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope instability, or drainage changes There would be no impact.
Mitigation Measures:
None required.
Monitoring:
None required.
The Wren Multiple-Family Development Project Initial Study 103 October 2024
Mandatory Findings of Significance
XXI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF
SIGNIFICANCE
Does the Project:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a) Have the potential to substantially
degrade the quality of the environment,
substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or
wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife
population to drop below self- sustaining
levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or
animal community, substantially reduce the
number or restrict the range of a rare or
endangered plant or animal, or eliminate
important examples of the major periods of
California history or prehistory?
✓
b) Have impacts which are individually
limited, but cumulatively considerable?
("Cumulatively considerable" means that
the incremental effects of a project are
considerable when viewed in connection
with the effects of past projects, other
current projects and probable future
projects)?
✓
c) Have environmental effects that will
cause substantial adverse effects on human
beings, either directly or indirectly?
✓
Discussion of Impacts
a) Less than Significant Impact With Mitigation Incorporated. The Project would not have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory (refer to Appendix B for biological resources assessment and Appendix C for cultural resources assessment). Where habitat may be adversely impacted (i.e., nesting birds) by the proposed Project, pre-construction surveys will be performed by experienced biologists during proper nesting seasons and follow mitigation measures to limit impacts to biological resources to the greatest extent possible. In addition, as part of the Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP), the developer is required to pay a Local Development Mitigation Fee (LDMF) to mitigate impacts to biological resources.
Mitigation Measure BIO-1 requires pre-construction nesting bird surveys prior to grading if construction would be constructed during the nesting season. Mitigation Measure CUL-1 requires a Native American monitor during grading. The implementation of these measures would reduce impacts to biological and cultural resources to less than significant levels.
The Wren Multiple-Family Development Project Initial Study 104 October 2024
General Plan Amendment Analysis: A commercial project constructed on the Project Site would also have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below selfsustaining levels less than significant impacts with because the analysis for this criterion is based on project location, not project type. The Project Site is the same for both a commercial project and a residential project. As such, similar mitigation measures would be required to be adopted for a commercial project. Therefore, with mitigation proposed, there is a less than significant impact to the approval of a GPA to convert the property from commercial to residential uses. b) Less than Significant Impact. The Proposed Project occurs in an urbanized area where development would occur within the region, with some projects being constructed and operated at the same time as the Proposed Project.
Air Quality Cumulative Impacts: The Proposed Project was found to not exceed SCAQMD thresholds during construction or operations. Therefore, the Proposed Project would not result in individually limited but cumulatively considerable impacts relative to air quality.
Transportation Impacts: Other reasonably foreseeable development projects which are either approved or being processed concurrently in the study area are included as part of a cumulative analysis scenario for traffic (Appendix G-1). A project’s contribution is less than cumulatively considerable if the project is required to implement or fund its fair share of a mitigation measure or measures designed to alleviate the cumulative impact.
Based on the additional projects to be constructed and operated within the same timeframe as the Proposed Project, the City has determined that roadway improvements to the intersection of Rosemount Road and Date Palm Drive are required to accommodate all projects at a regional level.
The Proposed Project will be responsible for its fair share of these improvements. Therefore, because traffic improvements are required as part of a cumulative impact of multiple projects and would be completed as part of the Proposed Project as required by the City, the impacts of the Project are less than cumulatively considerable.
Therefore, the Project would not have individually limited but cumulatively considerable impacts.
Impacts would be less than significant.
General Plan Amendment Analysis: A commercial project constructed on the Project Site may also have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, other current projects and probable future projects, as with the Proposed Project. As described in the analysis above, a commercial project would likely have greater air quality and trip generation impacts. However, these impacts would be consistent with the impacts analyzed in the General Plan EIR and would be mitigated based on projectspecific analysis. There is no evidence in the record that the General Plan Amendment would result in any more cumulatively significant impacts, because the proposed residential project generally has equivalent or reduced impacts when compared to a likely commercial project. Therefore, the GPA would have a less than cumulatively considerable impact on the environment and would likely result in a marginal reduction in impacts associated with air quality, greenhouse gases, transportation and some utilities.
The Wren Multiple-Family Development Project Initial Study 105 October 2024
c) Less than Significant Impact With Mitigation Incorporated. The Project would not have environmental effects that will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. Potential adverse effects include dust and other pollutant emissions during construction that could affect public health, although temporary in nature. As demonstrated in Section III Air Quality, localized PM10 and PM2.5 emissions will not exceed SCAQMD thresholds.
Mitigation Measure AIR-1 would require building construction and architectural coatings/painting occur simultaneously, the volatile organic compound (VOC) content to be no greater than 45 grams VOC per liter for interior paint, in compliance with SCAQMD rules. Implementation of this mitigation measure would ensure that the Proposed Project does not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly.
Mitigation Measure NOI-1 would require a sound attenuation study to verify that the project would achieve an interior noise reduction of 25 dBA, specifically for the units located adjacent to Date Palm Drive. Implementation of this mitigation measure would ensure that the Proposed Project does not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly.
General Plan Amendment Analysis: A commercial project constructed on the Project Site may also have environmental effects that will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly, as with the Proposed Project, as described in this Initial Study. . The impacts of any commercial project would be required to be assessed and mitigation proposed, similar to the Proposed Project. Therefore, there is a less than significant impact to the approval of a GPA to convert the property from commercial to residential uses. 106 October 2024
MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
Impact
Category
Mitigation Measures Action
Required
Implementati
on
Timing
Responsible
Agency
Compliance Verification
Initial Date Comments
Air
Resources
AIR-1: Should building construction and
architectural coatings/painting occur
simultaneously, the volatile organic compound
(VOC) content should be no greater than 45
grams VOC per liter for interior paint.
AIR-A: The Project
contractor shall
provide the City’s
Building
Department with
written
substantiation that
paint to be used for
the Project does not
exceed 45 grams
VOC per liter prior to
the initiation of any
building coating.
During
Construction.
City Building
Department
inspection
Biological
Resources
BIO-1: Nesting bird nesting season generally
extends from February 1 through September 15
in southern California and specifically, March 15
through August 31 for migratory passerine birds.
To avoid impacts to nesting birds (common and
special status) during the nesting season, a
qualified Avian Biologist will conduct preconstruction Nesting Bird Surveys (NBS) no more than 3-days prior to Project-related disturbance
to nestable vegetation to identify any active
nests. If no active nests are found, no further
action will be required. If an active nest is found,
the biologist will set appropriate no-work
buffers around the nest which will be based
upon the nesting species, its sensitivity to
disturbance, nesting stage, and expected types,
intensity, and duration of the disturbance. The
nests and buffer zones shall be field-checked
weekly by a qualified biological monitor. The
approved no-work buffer zone shall be clearly
BIO-A: If the initial
site grating occurs
between March 15
and September 15,
provide written
evidence to the
City’s Building
Department that a
pre-construction
nesting bird survey
has occurred within
three days prior to
issuance of the
grading permit.
Prior to any
land
disturbance.
Project applicant,
project biologist,
Planning
Department, City
Engineer.
The Wren Multiple-Family Development Project Initial Study Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
107 October 2024
Impact
Category
Mitigation Measures Action
Required
Implementati
on
Timing
Responsible
Agency
Compliance Verification
Initial Date Comments
marked in the field, within which no disturbance
activity shall commence until the qualified
biologist has determined the young birds have
successfully fledged and the nest is inactive.
Cultural
Resources
CUL-1: An approved Agua Caliente Band of
Cahuilla Indians (ACBCI) Cultural Resource
Monitor(s) shall be on-site during any ground
disturbing activities (including grubbing, grading
and excavation). Should buried cultural deposits
be encountered, the Monitor may request that
destructive construction halt. The Monitor shall
notify a Qualified Archaeologist (Secretary of the
Interior’s Standards and Guidelines) to
investigate and, if necessary, prepare a
mitigation plan for submission to the State
Historic Preservation Officer and the Agua
Caliente Tribal Historic Preservation Office.
CUL-A Prior to
issuance of grading
permits,
demonstrate
contract with ACBCI
for archaeological
monitoring. Within
30 days following
completion of
monitoring, a report
of findings will be
provided to the City.
Prior to any
ground
disturbance
and during
Construction.
Project applicant,
Agua Caliente
Band of Cahuilla
Indians, Planning
Department, City
Engineer
Noise NOI-1 Consistent with the Land Use
Compatibility Matrix and prior to issuance of
grading permit, a detailed sound attenuation
study is necessary to verify the Project will
achieve a minimum 25 dBA interior noise
reduction, specifically for apartment homes
located adjacent to Date Palm Drive.
NOI-A: Provide
detailed sound
attenuation study to
the City’s Building
Department to
verify the Project
will achieve a
minimum 25 dBA
interior noise
reduction,
specifically for
apartment homes
located adjacent to
Date Palm Drive
prior to issuance of
the grading permit.
During
building plan
check.
Project applicant,
project biologist,
Planning
Department, City
Engineer
The Wren Multiple-Family Development Project Initial Study Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
108 October 2024
Impact
Category
Mitigation Measures Action
Required
Implementati
on
Timing
Responsible
Agency
Compliance Verification
Initial Date Comments
Tribal
Cultural
Resources
CUL-1: An approved Agua Caliente Band of
Cahuilla Indians (ACBCI) Cultural Resource
Monitor(s) shall be on-site during any ground
disturbing activities (including grubbing, grading
and excavation). Should buried cultural deposits
be encountered, the Monitor may request that
destructive construction halt. The Monitor shall
notify a Qualified Archaeologist (Secretary of the
Interior’s Standards and Guidelines) to
investigate and, if necessary, prepare a
mitigation plan for submission to the State
Historic Preservation Officer and the Agua
Caliente Tribal Historic Preservation Office.
CUL-A Prior to
issuance of grading
permits,
demonstrate
contract with ACBCI
for archaeological
monitoring. Within
30 days following
completion of
monitoring, a report
of findings will be
provided to the City.
Prior to any
ground
disturbance
and during
Construction.
Project applicant,
Agua Caliente
Band of Cahuilla
Indians, Planning
Department, City
Engineer
Appendix A
Date Palm Apartments
Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Study,
prepared by MD Acoustics, August 30, 2024
The Wren Multiple-Family Development Project Initial Study Appendix B
Biological Resources Assessment, Jurisdictional Delineation and CVMSHP Consistency Analysis for the Date Palm Apartment Complex, City of Cathedral City, prepared by Jennings Environmental, August 2023
The Wren Multiple-Family Development Project Initial Study Appendix C
Historical/Archaeological Resources Survey Report, Assessor’s Parcel Nos. 670-110-043, -045, -048 to -053, -055, and -056, prepared by CRM Tech, October 24, 2023
The Wren Multiple-Family Development Project Initial Study Appendix D-1
Geotechnical Report for Living Care Assisted Living, APN 670-110-043, prepared by LandMark Consultants, June 15, 2023
The Wren Multiple-Family Development Project Initial Study Appendix D-2
Paleontological Resources Assessment Report, Assessor’s Parcel Nos. 670- 110-043, -045, -048 to -053, -055, and -056, prepared by CRM Tech, October 24, 2023
The Wren Multiple-Family Development Project Initial Study Appendix E-1
Preliminary Hydrology Study, for The Wren, APN 670-110-043, prepared by Christiansen & Company, October 2023
The Wren Multiple-Family Development Project Initial Study Appendix E-2
Project Specific Water Quality Management Plan, prepared by Christiansen & Company, October 11, 2023
The Wren Multiple-Family Development Project Initial Study Appendix F
Date Palm Apartments Noise Impact Study, prepared by MD Acoustic, October 17, 2023
The Wren Multiple-Family Development Project Initial Study Appendix G-1
The Wren Project Transportation Analysis, prepared by Integrated Engineering Group, June 2024
The Wren Multiple-Family Development Project Initial Study Appendix G-2
Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Analysis, The Wren Residential Development, Cathedral City, CA, prepared by General Technologies and Solutions, June 3, 2024
The Wren Multiple-Family Development Project Initial Study Appendix H
Project Plans
The Wren Multiple-Family Development Project
Appendix A
Date Palm Apartments
Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Study
MD Acoustics
August 30, 2024
Date Palm Apartments
Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact
Study
City of Cathedral City, CA
Prepared for:
Ms. Julie Gilbert
Compass Consulting Enterprises, Inc.
PO Box 2627
Avalon, CA 90704
Prepared by:
MD Acoustics, LLC
Tyler Klassen, EIT
1197 Los Angeles Ave, Ste C-256
Simi Valley, CA 93065
Date: 8/30/2024
Date Palm Apartments
Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Study
City of Cathedral City, CA TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 2.0
Introduction ..........................................................................................................................1
1.1 1.2
Purpose of Analysis and Study Objectives
Project Summary
1.2.1 Site Location
1.2.2 Project Description
1.2.3 Sensitive Receptors
Executive Summary of Findings and Mitigation Measures
1 1
1 1
1 1.3 2
Regulatory Framework and Background.................................................................................6
2.1 Air Quality Regulatory Setting
2.1.1 National and State
2.1.2 South Coast Air Quality Management District
2.1.3 Local
Greenhouse Gas Regulatory Setting
2.2.1 International
2.2.2 National
2.2.3 California
2.2.4 South Coast Air Quality Management District
2.2.5 Local
6 6
8 11
12 12
13 14
21 22
2.2 3.0 Setting.................................................................................................................................25
3.1 Existing Physical Setting
3.1.1 Local Climate and Meteorology
3.1.2 Local Air Quality
25 25
26 28
30 3.1.3 Attainment Status
3.2 Greenhouse Gases
4.0 5.0
Modeling Parameters and Assumptions ...............................................................................32
4.1 4.2
4.3 4.4
Construction
Operations
Localized Construction Analysis
Localized Operational Analysis
32 33
33 34
Thresholds of Significance....................................................................................................35
5.1 Air Quality Thresholds of Significance
5.1.1 CEQA Guidelines for Air Quality
35 35
35 36
36 36
36 37
5.1.2 Regional Significance Thresholds for Construction Emissions
5.1.3 Regional Significance Thresholds for Operational Emissions
5.1.4 Thresholds for Localized Significance
Greenhouse Gas Thresholds of Significance
5.2.1 CEQA Guidelines for Greenhouse Gas
Toxic Air Contaminants
5.2 5.3
6.0 Air Quality Emissions Impact................................................................................................38 MD Acoustics, LLC ii
JN: 08052308_Report_8.30.2024_clean
Date Palm Apartments
Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Study
City of Cathedral City, CA TABLE OF CONTENTS
6.1 Construction Air Quality Emissions Impact 38
38 39
40 40
40 41
41 41
43 43
43 44
6.1.1 Regional Construction Emissions
6.1.2 Localized Construction Emissions
6.1.3 Construction-Related Human Health Impacts
6.1.4 Odors
6.1.5 Construction-Related Toxic Air Contaminant Impact Operational Air Quality Emissions Impact
6.2.1 Regional Operational Emissions
6.2.2 Localized Operational Emissions
6.2.3 Operations-Related Human Health Impacts
CO Hot Spot Emissions
6.2 6.3
6.4 6.5
Cumulative Regional Air Quality Impacts
Air Quality Compliance
7.0 8.0
Greenhouse Gas Impact Analysis..........................................................................................46
7.1 7.2
7.3 Construction Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact
Operational Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact
Greenhouse Gas Plan Consistency
46 46
47 Energy Analysis....................................................................................................................50
8.1 Construction Energy Demand 50
50 51
52 52
53 54
54 55
55 8.1.1 Construction Equipment Electricity Usage Estimates
8.1.2 Construction Equipment Fuel Estimates
8.1.3 Construction Worker Fuel Estimates
8.1.4 Construction Vendor/Hauling Fuel Estimates
8.1.5 Construction Energy Efficiency/Conservation Measures Operational Energy Demand
8.2.1 Transportation Fuel Consumption
8.2.2 Facility Energy Demands (Electricity and Natural Gas) Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency Plan Consistency
8.2 8.3
9.0 CEQA Analysis............................................................................. Error! Bookmark not defined.
10.0 References...........................................................................................................................57 MD Acoustics, LLC iii
JN: 08052308_Report_8.30.2024_clean
Date Palm Apartments
Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Study
City of Cathedral City, CA TABLE OF CONTENTS
LIST OF APPENDICES
Appendix A:
CalEEMod Output
Appendix B:
EMFAC2017 Output
LIST OF EXHIBITS
Exhibit A ...........................................................................................................................................4 Location Map 4
Exhibit B ...........................................................................................................................................5 Site Plan 5
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1: Land Use Summary........................................................................................................................ 1 Table 2: Ambient Air Quality Standards ..................................................................................................... 7 Table 3: Meteorological Summary............................................................................................................ 26 Table 4: Local Area Air Quality Levels from Palm Springs Air Monitoring Station1.................................. 27 Table 5: Coachella Valley Portion of the Salton Sea Air Basin Attainment Status ................................... 29 Table 6: Description of Greenhouse Gases............................................................................................... 31 Table 7: Construction Equipment Assumptions1 ...................................................................................... 34 Table 8: Regional Significance – Unmitigated Construction Emissions (pounds/day) ............................. 38 Table 9: Localized Significance – Construction......................................................................................... 39 Table 10: Regional Significance - Unmitigated Operational Emissions (lbs/day)..................................... 41 Table 11: Localized Significance – Unmitigated Operational Emissions................................................... 42 Table 12: Construction Greenhouse Gas Emissions ................................................................................. 46 Table 13: Opening Year Unmitigated Project-Related Greenhouse Gas Emissions ................................. 47 Table 14: City of Cathedral City CAP Applicable Measures Project Comparison ..................................... 49 Table 15: Project Construction Power Cost and Electricity Usage ........................................................... 50 Table 16: Construction Equipment Fuel Consumption Estimates............................................................ 51 Table 17: Construction Worker Fuel Consumption Estimates ................................................................. 52 Table 18: Construction Vendor Fuel Consumption Estimates (MHD Trucks)1 ......................................... 53 Table 19: Construction Hauling Fuel Consumption Estimates (HHD Trucks)1 .......................................... 53 MD Acoustics, LLC iv
JN: 08052308_Report_8.30.2024_clean
Date Palm Apartments
Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Study
City of Cathedral City, CA TABLE OF CONTENTS
Table 20: Estimated Vehicle Operations Fuel Consumption .................................................................... 54 Table 21: Project Unmitigated Annual Operational Energy Demand Summary1 ..................................... 55 MD Acoustics, LLC v
JN: 08052308_Report_8.30.2024_clean
Date Palm Apartments
Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Study
City of Cathedral City, CA TABLE OF CONTENTS
GLOSSARY OF TERMS
AQMP
CAAQS
CARB
CEQA
CFCs
CH4
Air Quality Management Plan
California Ambient Air Quality Standards
California Air Resources Board
California Environmental Quality Act
Chlorofluorocarbons
Methane
Compressed natural gas
Carbon monoxide
CNG
CO
CO2 Carbon dioxide
CO2e
DPM
GHG
HFCs
LST
MTCO2e
MMTCO2e
NAAQS
NOx
Carbon dioxide equivalent
Diesel particulate matter
Greenhouse gas
Hydrofluorocarbons
Localized Significant Thresholds
Metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent
Million metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent
National Ambient Air Quality Standards
Nitrogen Oxides
NO2
N2O
Nitrogen dioxide
Nitrous oxide
O3
PFCs
Ozone
Perfluorocarbons
PM Particle matter
PM10
PM2.5
PMI
PPM
PPB
Particles that are less than 10 micrometers in diameter Particles that are less than 2.5 micrometers in diameter Point of maximum impact
Parts per million
Parts per billion
RTIP
RTP
SCAQMD
SF6
Regional Transportation Improvement Plan
Regional Transportation Plan
South Coast Air Quality Management District
Sulfur hexafluoride
SIP
SOx
State Implementation Plan
Sulfur Oxides
SRA
SSAB
Source/Receptor Area
Salton Sea Air Basin
TAC
VOC
WRCC
Toxic air contaminants
Volatile organic compounds
Western Regional Climate Center
MD Acoustics, LLC vi
JN: 08052308_Report_8.30.2024_clean
Date Palm Apartments
Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Study
City of Cathedral City, CA Introduction
1.0 Introduction
1.1 Purpose of Analysis and Study Objectives
This air quality and greenhouse gas (GHG) analysis was prepared to evaluate whether the estimated criteria pollutants and GHG emissions generated from the project would cause a significant impact to the air resources in the project area. This assessment was conducted within the context of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA, California Public Resources Code Sections 21000, et seq.).
The assessment is consistent with the methodology and emission factors endorsed by South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD), California Air Resource Board (CARB), and the United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA).
1.2 Project Summary
1.2.1 Site Location
The project site is located on the east side of Date Palm Drive between 30th Ave and Mccallum Way in the City of Cathedral City, as shown in Exhibit A. The site is currently zoned as Planned Community Commercial by the City of Cathedral City. The project is bordered by single family residential uses to the east and south, commercial uses to the north, and Date Palm Drive to the west.
1.2.2 Project Description
The project proposes the construction of a 204-unit apartment complex with 318 parking spaces on approximately 11.49 acres. Exhibit B demonstrates the site plan for the project.
Construction activities within the project area will consist of site preparation, grading, building, paving, and architectural coating. Table 1 summarizes the land use description for the project Site.
Table 1: Land Use Summary
Land Use Unit Amount Size Metric
Apartments Mid Rise
Garages
204.0
192.0
4.4 Dwelling Units
Spaces
Parking Lot Acres
1.2.3 Sensitive Receptors
Sensitive receptors are considered land uses or other types of population groups that are more sensitive to air pollution than others due to their exposure. Sensitive population groups include children, the elderly, the acutely and chronically ill, and those with cardio-respiratory diseases. For CEQA purposes, a sensitive receptor would be a location where a sensitive individual could remain for 24-hours or longer, such as residences, hospitals, and schools (etc.). 1 Date Palm Apartments
Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Study
City of Cathedral City, CA Introduction
The closest existing sensitive receptors (to the site area) are multi-family residences 10 feet to the east of the project boundary.
1.3 Executive Summary of Findings and Mitigation Measures The following is a summary of the analysis results:
Construction-Source Emissions
Project construction-source emissions would not exceed regional thresholds of significance established by the SCAQMD for VOCs. For localized emissions, the project will not exceed applicable Localized Significance Thresholds (LSTs) established by the SCAQMD.
Project construction-source emissions would not conflict with the Basin Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP). As discussed herein, the project will comply with all applicable SCAQMD construction-source emission reduction rules and guidelines. Project construction source emissions would not cause or substantively contribute to violation of the California Ambient Air Quality Standards (CAAQS) or National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS).
Established requirements addressing construction equipment operations, and construction material use, storage, and disposal requirements act to minimize odor impacts that may result from construction activities. Moreover, construction-source odor emissions would be temporary, shortterm, and intermittent in nature and would not result in persistent impacts that would affect substantial numbers of people. Potential construction-source odor impacts are therefore considered less-than-significant.
Operational-Source Emissions
The project operational-sourced emissions would not exceed applicable regional thresholds of significance established by the SCAQMD. Project operational-source emissions would not result in or cause a significant localized air quality impact as discussed in the Operations-Related Local Air Quality Impacts section of this report. Additionally, project-related traffic will not cause or result in CO concentrations exceeding applicable state and/or federal standards (CO “hotspots). Project operational-source emissions would therefore not adversely affect sensitive receptors within the vicinity of the project.
Project operational-source emissions would not conflict with the Basin Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP). The project's emissions meet SCAQMD regional thresholds and will not result in a significant cumulative impact. The project does not propose any such uses or activities that would result in potentially significant operational-source odor impacts. Potential operational-source odor impacts are therefore considered less-than significant.
Project-related GHG emissions meet the County of Riverside Climate Action Plan (CAP) Update screening threshold of 3,000 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalents (MTCO2e) per year and are also considered to be less than significant. The project also complies with the goals of the CARB Scoping Plan, AB-32, and SB-32.
2 Date Palm Apartments
Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Study
City of Cathedral City, CA Introduction
Mitigation Measures
A. Construction Measures
Adherence to SCAQMD Rule 403 is required.
Mitigation Measure 1: VOC content of interior architectural coatings shall be limited to 45 grams VOC per liter.
B. Operational Measures to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions No operational mitigation required.
3 Date Palm Apartments
Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Study
City of Cathedral City, CA Introduction
Exhibit A
Location Map
30th Avenue
SITE
Mccallum Way
4 Date Palm Apartments
Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Study
City of Cathedral City, CA Introduction
Exhibit B
Site Plan
5 Date Palm Apartments
Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Study
City of Cathedral City, CA Regulatory Framework and Background
2.0 Regulatory Framework and Background
2.1 Air Quality Regulatory Setting
Air pollutants are regulated at the national, state, and air basin level; each agency has a different level of regulatory responsibility. The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulates at the national level. The California Air Resources Board (ARB) regulates at the state level. The South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) regulates at the air basin level.
2.1.1 National and State
The EPA is responsible for global, international, and interstate air pollution issues and policies. The EPA sets national vehicle and stationary source emission standards, oversees approval of all State Implementation Plans, provides research and guidance for air pollution programs, and sets National Air Quality Standards, also known as federal standards. There are six common air pollutants, called criteria pollutants, which were identified from the provisions of the Clean Air Act of 1970. •
•
•
•
•
•
•
Ozone
Nitrogen Dioxide
Lead
Particulate Matter (PM10 and PM2.5)
Carbon Monoxide
Particulate Matter
Sulfur Dioxide
The federal standards were set to protect public health, including that of sensitive individuals; thus, the standards continue to change as more medical research is available regarding the health effects of the criteria pollutants. Primary federal standards are the levels of air quality necessary, with an adequate margin of safety, to project the public health.
A State Implementation Plan (SIP) is a document prepared by each state describing existing air quality conditions and measures that will be followed to attain and maintain federal standards. The State Implementation Plan for the State of California is administered by the ARB, which has overall responsibility for statewide air quality maintenance and air pollution prevention. California’s State Implementation Plan incorporates individual federal attainment plans for regional air districts—air district prepares their federal attainment plan, which are sent to ARB to be approved and incorporated into the California State Implementation Plan. Federal attainment plans include the technical foundation for understanding air quality (e.g., emission inventories and air quality monitoring), control measures and strategies, and enforcement mechanisms. See http://www.arb.ca.gov/research/aaqs/aaqs.htm for additional information on criteria pollutants and air quality standards.
The federal and state ambient air quality standards are summarized in Table 2 and can also be found at http://www.arb.ca.gov/research/aaqs/aaqs2.pdf.
6 Date Palm Apartments
Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Study
City of Cathedral City, CA Regulatory Framework and Background Table 2: Ambient Air Quality Standards
California Standards1 National Standards2
Pollutant Averaging Time
Concentrations3 Method4 Primary3,5
- -
Secondary3,6 Method7
Ultraviolet
Photometry
Inertial Separation
and Gravimetric
Analysis
1-Hour
8-Hour
24-Hour
0.09 ppm
0.070 ppm
50 μg/m3
Ultraviolet
Photometry
Same as Primary
Standard Ozone (O3) 0.070 ppm (147 μg/m3
)
150 μ/m3 Respirable
Particulate Matter
(PM10)8
Gravimetric or Beta
Attenuation
Same as Primary
Annual Arithmetic Mean Standard
24-Hour
20 μg/m3
- -
- -
Same as Primary
Standard - - 35 μg/m3
12 μg/m3
Inertial Separation
and Gravimetric
Analysis
Fine Particulate
Matter (PM2.5)8 Gravimetric or Beta
Attenuation Annual Arithmetic Mean 12 μg/m3 15 μg/m3
1-Hour
8-Hour
8-Hour
(Lake Tahoe)
1-Hour
20 ppm (23 μg/m3)
9.0 ppm (10 μg/m3)
35 ppm (40 μg/m3)
9 ppm (10 μg/m3)
- -
- -
Non-Dispersive
Infrared Photometry
(NDIR)
Non-Dispersive
Infrared
Photometry (NDIR)
Carbon Monoxide
(CO) 6 ppm (7 μg/m3
)
0.18 ppm (339 μg/m3)
0.030 ppm (357 μg/m3)
0.25 ppm (655 μg/m3)
- -
- - - -
100 ppb (188 μg/m3)
0.053 ppm (100 μg/m3)
75 ppb (196 μg/m3)
- -
- -
Same as Primary
Standard
- -
0.5 ppm
(1300 mg/m3)
Nitrogen Dioxide
(NO2)
9 Gas Phase
Chemiluminescence
Gas Phase
Annual Arithmetic Mean Chemiluminescence
1-Hour
Ultraviolet
Fluorescence;
Spectrophotometry
(Pararosaniline
Method)
3-Hour
Ultraviolet
Fluorescence Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)
10 0.14 ppm
(for certain areas)10
0.130ppm
24-Hour 0.04 ppm (105 μg/m3) - -
Annual Arithmetic Mean - -
30 Day Average
- -
1.5 μg/m3
- -
(for certain areas)10
- -
1.5 μg/m3
(for certain areas)12
High Volume
Sampler and Atomic
Absorption
Lead11,12 Calendar Qrtr Atomic Absorption Same as Primary Standard Rolling 3-Month Average - - 0.15 μg/m3
Beta Attenuation and
Transmittance
through Filter Tape
Ion Chromatography
Ultraviolet
Visibility Reducing
Particles13 8-Hour See footnote 13
No
National
Standards
Sulfates 24-Hour
1-Hour
25 μg/m3
Hydrogen Sulfide
Vinyl Chloride11
0.03 ppm (42 μg/m3)
0.01 ppm (26 μg/m3)
Fluorescence
24-Hour Gas Chromatography
Notes:
1. California standards for ozone, carbon monoxide (except 8-hour Lake Tahoe), sulfur dioxide (1 and 24 hour), nitrogen dioxide, and particulate matter (PM10, PM2.5, and visibility reducing particles), are values that are not to be exceeded. All others are not to be equaled or exceeded. California ambient air quality standards are listed in the Table of Standards in Section 70200 of Title 17 of the California Code of Regulations.
2. National standards (other than ozone, particulate matter, and those based on annual arithmetic mean) are not to be exceeded more than once a year. The ozone standard is attained when the fourth highest 8-hour concentration measured at each site in a year, averaged over three years, is equal to or less than the standard. For PM10, the 24 hour standard is attained when the expected number of days per calendar year with a 24-hour average concentration above 150 μg/m3 is equal to or less than one. For PM2.5, the 24 hour standard is attained when 98 percent of the daily concentrations, averaged over three years, are equal to or less than the standard. Contact the U.S. EPA for further clarification and current national policies.
3. Concentration expressed first in units in which it was promulgated. Equivalent units given in parentheses are based upon a reference temperature of 25°C and a reference pressure of 760 torr. Most measurements of air quality are to be corrected to a reference temperature of 25°C and a reference pressure of 760 torr; ppm in this table refers to ppm by volume, or micromoles of pollutant per mole of gas.
4. Any equivalent measurement method which can be shown to the satisfaction of the ARB to give equivalent results at or near the level of the air quality standard may be used.
5. National Primary Standards: The levels of air quality necessary, with an adequate margin of safety to protect the public health.
6. National Secondary Standards: The levels of air quality necessary to protect the public welfare from any known or anticipated adverse effects of a pollutant.
7. Reference method as described by the U.S. EPA. An “equivalent method” of measurement may be used but must have a “consistent relationship to the reference method” and must be approved by the U.S. EPA. 7 Date Palm Apartments
Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Study
City of Cathedral City, CA Regulatory Framework and Background
8. On December 14, 2012, the national annual PM2.5 primary standard was lowered from 15 μg/m3 to 12.0 μg/m3. The existing national 24-hour PM2.5 standards (primary and secondary) were retained at 35 μg/m3, as was the annual secondary standard of 15 μg/m3. The existing 24-hour PM10 standards (primary and secondary) of 150 μg/m3 also were retained. The form of the annual primary and secondary standards is the annual mean, averaged over 3 years.
9. To attain the 1-hour national standard, the 3-year average of the annual 98th percentile of the 1-hour daily maximum concentrations at each site must not exceed 100 ppb. Note that the national 1-hour standard is in units of parts per billion (ppb). California standards are in units of parts per million (ppm). To directly compare the national 1-hour standard to the California standards the units can be converted from ppb to ppm. In this case, the national standard of 100 ppb is identical to 0.100 ppm.
10. On June 2, 2010, a new 1-hour SO2 standard was established and the existing 24-hour and annual primary standards were revoked. To attain the 1- hour national standard, the 3-year average of the annual 99th percentile of the 1-hour daily maximum concentrations at each site must not exceed 75 ppb. The 1971 SO2 national standards (24-hour and annual) remain in effect until one year after an area is designated for the 2010 standard, except that in areas designated nonattainment for the 1971 standards, the 1971 standards remain in effect until implementation plans to attain or maintain the 2010 standards are approved.
Note that the 1-hour national standard is in units of parts per billion (ppb). California standards are in units of parts per million (ppm). To directly compare the 1-hour national standard to the California standard the units can be converted to ppm. In this case, the national standard of 75 ppb is identical to 0.075 ppm.
11. The ARB has identified lead and vinyl chloride as 'toxic air contaminants' with no threshold level of exposure for adverse health effects determined.
These actions allow for the implementation of control measures at levels below the ambient concentrations specified for these pollutants.
12. The national standard for lead was revised on October 15, 2008 to a rolling 3-month average. The 1978 lead standard (1.5 μg/m3 as a quarterly average) remains in effect until one year after an area is designated for the 2008 standard, except that in areas designated nonattainment for the 1978 standard, the 1978 standard remains in effect until implementation plans to attain or maintain the 2008 standard are approved.
13. In 1989, the ARB converted both the general statewide 10-mile visibility standard and the Lake Tahoe 30-mile visibility standard to instrumental equivalents, which are "extinction of 0.23 per kilometer" and "extinction of 0.07 per kilometer" for the statewide and Lake Tahoe Air Basin standards, respectively.
Several pollutants listed in Table 2 are not addressed in this analysis. Analysis of lead is not included in this report because the project is not anticipated to emit lead. Visibility-reducing particles are not explicitly addressed in this analysis because particulate matter is addressed. The project is not expected to generate or be exposed to vinyl chloride because proposed project uses do not utilize the chemical processes that create this pollutant and there are no such uses in the project vicinity. The proposed project is not expected to cause exposure to hydrogen sulfide because it would not generate hydrogen sulfide in any substantial quantity.
2.1.2 South Coast Air Quality Management District
The agency for air pollution control for the Salton Sea Air Basin (basin) is the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). SCAQMD is responsible for controlling emissions primarily from stationary sources. SCAQMD maintains air quality monitoring stations throughout the basin. SCAQMD, in coordination with the Southern California Association of Governments, is also responsible for developing, updating, and implementing the Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) for the basin. An AQMP is a plan prepared and implemented by an air pollution district for a county or region designated as nonattainment of the federal and/or California ambient air quality standards. The term nonattainment area is used to refer to an air basin where one or more ambient air quality standards are exceeded.
Every three (3) years the SCAQMD prepares a new AQMP, updating the previous plan and having a 20- year horizon.
8 Date Palm Apartments
Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Study
City of Cathedral City, CA Regulatory Framework and Background On March 23, 2017 CARB approved the 2016 AQMP. The 2016 AQMP is a regional blueprint for achieving the federal air quality standards and healthful air.
The 2016 AQMP includes both stationary and mobile source strategies to ensure that rapidly approaching attainment deadlines are met, that public health is protected to the maximum extent feasible, and that the region is not faced with burdensome sanctions if the Plan is not approved or if the NAAQS are not met on time. As with every AQMP, a comprehensive analysis of emissions, meteorology, atmospheric chemistry, regional growth projections, and the impact of existing control measures is updated with the latest data and methods. The most significant air quality challenge in the Basin is to reduce nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions sufficiently to meet the upcoming ozone standard deadlines. The primary goal of the 2016 AQMP is to meet clean air standards and protect public health, including ensuring benefits to environmental justice and disadvantaged communities. Now that the plan has been approved by CARB, it has been forwarded to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency for its review. If approved by EPA, the plan becomes federally enforceable.
South Coast AQMD adopted the 2022 AQMP on December 2, 2022, to address the attainment of the 2015 8-hour ozone standard (70 ppb) for South Coast Air Basin and Coachella Valley. To meet this standard, the AQMP determined NOx emissions must be reduced by 67% percent more than is required by adopted rules and regulations by 2037. The control strategy for the 2022 AQMP includes aggressive new regulations and the development of incentive programs to support early deployment of advanced technologies. The two key areas for incentive programs are (1) promoting widespread deployment of available zero-emission (ZE) and low NOx technologies and (2) developing new ZE and ultra-low NOx technologies for use in cases where the technology is not currently available. South Coast AQMD will prioritize distribution of incentive funding in environmental justice areas and seek opportunities to focus benefits on the most disadvantaged communities. Cost-effectiveness and affordability will be further considered during the rulemaking or incentive program development process.
On June 21, 2002, the SCAQMD adopted the 2002 Coachella Valley PM10 State Implementation Plan (CVSIP). The 2002 CVSIP, which included a request for extension of the PM10 deadline and met all applicable federal Clean Air Act requirements, including a Most Stringent Measures analysis, control measures, and attainment demonstration. U.S. EPA approved the 2002 CVSIP on April 18, 2003. At the time of adoption, the AQMD committed to revising with the 2002 CVSIP with the latest approved mobile source emissions estimates, planning assumptions and fugitive dust source emission estimates, when they became available.
The 2003 CVSIP updates those elements of the 2002 CVSIP; the control strategies and control measure commitments have not been revised and remain the same as in the 2002 CVSIP. The 2003 CVSIP contains updated emissions inventories, emission budgets, and attainment modeling. It requests that U.S. EPA replace the approved transportation conformity budgets in the 2002 CVSIP with those in the 2003 CVSIP. U.S. EPA approved these budgets on March 25, 2004 with an effective date of April 9, 2004.
9 Date Palm Apartments
Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Study
City of Cathedral City, CA Regulatory Framework and Background South Coast Air Quality Management District Rules
The AQMP for the basin establishes a program of rules and regulations administered by SCAQMD to obtain attainment of the state and federal standards. Some of the rules and regulations that apply to this Project include, but are not limited to, the following:
SCAQMD Rule 402 prohibits a person from discharging from any source whatsoever such quantities of air contaminants or other material which cause injury, detriment, nuisance, or annoyance to any considerable number of persons or to the public, or which endanger the comfort, repose, health or safety of any such persons or the public, or which cause, or have a natural tendency to cause, injury or damage to business or property.
SCAQMD Rule 403 governs emissions of fugitive dust during construction and operation activities.
Compliance with this rule is achieved through application of standard Best Management Practices, such as application of water or chemical stabilizers to disturbed soils, covering haul vehicles, restricting vehicle speeds on unpaved roads to 15 miles per hour, sweeping loose dirt from paved site access roadways, cessation of construction activity when winds exceed 25 mph, and establishing a permanent ground cover on finished sites.
Rule 403 requires that fugitive dust be controlled with best available control measures so that the presence of such dust does not remain visible in the atmosphere beyond the property line of the emission source. In addition, Rule 403 requires implementation of dust suppression techniques to prevent fugitive dust from creating a nuisance off site. Applicable suppression techniques are indicated below and include but are not limited to the following:
• Apply nontoxic chemical soil stabilizers according to manufacturers’ specifications to all inactive construction areas (previously graded areas in active for 10 days or more).
Water active sites at least three times daily.
Cover all trucks hauling dirt, sand, soil, or other loose materials, or maintain at least 2 feet of freeboard in accordance with the requirements of California Vehicle Code (CVC) section 23114.
Pave construction access roads at least 100 feet onto the site from the main road.
Reduce traffic speeds on all unpaved roads to 15 mph or less. •
•
•
•
• Suspension of all grading activities when wind speeds (including instantaneous wind gusts) exceed 25 mph.
• Bumper strips or similar best management practices shall be provided where vehicles enter and exit the construction site onto paved roads or wash off trucks and any equipment leaving the site each trip.
•
•
Replanting disturbed areas as soon as practical.
During all construction activities, construction contractors shall sweep on-site and off-site streets if silt is carried to adjacent public thoroughfares, to reduce the amount of particulate matter on public streets.
SCAQMD Rule 1113 governs the sale, use, and manufacturing of architectural coating and limits the VOC content in paints and paint solvents. This rule regulates the VOC content of paints available during 10 Date Palm Apartments
Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Study
City of Cathedral City, CA Regulatory Framework and Background construction. Therefore, all paints and solvents used during construction and operation of project must comply with Rule 1113.
Idling Diesel Vehicle Trucks – Idling for more than 5 minutes in any one location is prohibited within California borders.
Rule 2702. The SCAQMD adopted Rule 2702 on February 6, 2009, which establishes a voluntary air quality investment program from which SCAQMD can collect funds from parties that desire certified GHG emission reductions, pool those funds, and use them to purchase or fund GHG emission reduction projects within two years, unless extended by the SCAQMD Governing Board. Priority will be given to projects that result in co-benefit emission reductions of GHG emissions and criteria or toxic air pollutants within environmental justice areas. Further, this voluntary program may compete with the cap-and-trade program identified for implementation in CARB’s Scoping Plan, or a Federal cap and trade program.
2.1.3 Local
Local jurisdictions, such as the City of Cathedral City, have the authority and responsibility to reduce air pollution through its police power and decision-making authority. It is the responsibility of the District, CVAG, and the City of Cathedral City to monitor pollutant levels and regulate air pollution sources.
With the installation of additional monitoring devices in the Whitewater River, the District is collecting data to establish a “naturally occurring” or “background” level for PM10 in the Coachella Valley. This data will allow a more meaningful estimate of manmade PM10 emissions.
City of Cathedral City General Plan
The City of Cathedral City updated their General Plan in July 2019. The 2019 General Plan Air Quality and Climate Stability Element contains the following goals and policies aimed at reducing air pollution:
Goal Preservation and enhancement of local and regional air quality to assure the long-term protection of the community’s health and welfare.
Policy 1 The City shall be proactive in regulating local pollutant emitters and shall cooperate with Coachella Valley Association of Governments and the South Coast Air Quality Management District to assure compliance with air quality standards.
Policy 2 The City shall fully implement dust control ordinances, and coordinate and cooperate with local, regional, and federal efforts to monitor, manage, and reduce the levels of major pollutants affecting the City and region, with particular emphasis on PM10 emissions.
Policy 3 City land use planning efforts shall assure that sensitive receptors are separated from polluting point sources, to the greatest extent practicable. 11 Date Palm Apartments
Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Study
City of Cathedral City, CA Regulatory Framework and Background Policy 4 Development proposals brought before the City shall be reviewed for their potential to adversely impact local and regional air quality, and shall be required to mitigate any significant impacts.
Policy 5
Policy 6
The City shall encourage and promote the use of clean alternative energy sources for transportation, heating and cooling, lighting and other power needs.
The City shall encourage and support the development of facilities and projects that facilitate and enhance the use of alternative modes of transportation, including pedestrian-oriented retail and activity centers, dedicated bicycle and LSEV paths and lanes, and community-wide multi-use trails.
Policy 7
Policy 8
Policy 9
Policy 10
The City shall promote the expanded availability of mass transit services, coordinating with Sunline Transit Authority to link residential, commercial and resort businesses, and employment centers with the City’s residential neighborhoods and nearby communities.
The City shall continue to implement effective street sweeping and post-windstorm cleanup programs to reduce the cumulative impacts of blowsand and nuisance dust resulting from construction activities, natural processes, and other sources.
The City shall promote public educational programs that describe the causes of air pollution, encourage the use of alternative energy sources, and recommend methods for reducing the impacts of blowsand.
The City shall continue to implement and update policies, regulations, and action plans that promote climate stability and greenhouse gas emission reductions, including but not limited to the Climate Action Plan, Energy Action Plan, Greenhouse Gas Inventory and Green for Life program.
2.2 Greenhouse Gas Regulatory Setting
2.2.1 International
Many countries around the globe have made an effort to reduce GHGs since climate change is a global issue.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. In 1988, the United Nations and the World Meteorological Organization established the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change to assess the scientific, technical and socio-economic information relevant to understanding the scientific basis of risk of human-induced climate change, its potential impacts, and options for adaptation and mitigation.
United Nations. The United States participates in the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) (signed on March 21, 1994). Under the Convention, governments gather and share information on greenhouse gas emissions, national policies, and best practices; launch national 12 Date Palm Apartments
Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Study
City of Cathedral City, CA Regulatory Framework and Background strategies for addressing greenhouse gas emissions and adapting to expected impacts, including the provision of financial and technological support to developing countries; and cooperate in preparing for adaptation to the impacts of climate change.
The 2014 UN Climate Change Conference in Lima Peru provided a unique opportunity to engage all countries to assess how developed countries are implementing actions to reduce emissions.
Kyoto Protocol. The Kyoto Protocol is a treaty made under the UNFCCC and was the first international agreement to regulate GHG emissions. It has been estimated that if the commitments outlined in the Kyoto Protocol are met, global GHG emissions could be reduced by an estimated 5 percent from 1990 levels during the first commitment period of 2008 – 2012 (UNFCCC 1997). On December 8, 2012, the Doha Amendment to the Kyoto Protocol was adopted. The amendment includes: New commitments for Annex I Parties to the Kyoto Protocol who agreed to take on commitments in a second commitment period from 2013 – 2020; a revised list of greenhouse gases (GHG) to be reported on by Parties in the second commitment period; and Amendments to several articles of the Kyoto Protocol which specifically referenced issues pertaining to the first commitment period and which needed to be updated for the second commitment period.
2.2.2 National
Greenhouse Gas Endangerment. On December 2, 2009, the EPA announced that GHGs threaten the public health and welfare of the American people. The EPA also states that GHG emissions from onroad vehicles contribute to that threat. The decision was based on Massachusetts v. EPA (Supreme Court Case 05-1120) which argued that GHGs are air pollutants covered by the Clean Air Act and that the EPA has authority to regulate those emissions.
Clean Vehicles. Congress first passed the Corporate Average Fuel Economy law in 1975 to increase the fuel economy of cars and light duty trucks. The law has become more stringent over time. On May 19, 2009, President Obama put in motion a new national policy to increase fuel economy for all new cars and trucks sold in the United States. On April 1, 2010, the EPA and the Department of Transportation’s National Highway Safety Administration announced a joint final rule establishing a national program that would reduce greenhouse gas emissions and improve fuel economy for new cars and trucks sold in the United States.
The first phase of the national program would apply to passenger cars, light-duty trucks, and mediumduty passenger vehicles, covering model years 2012 through 2016. They require these vehicles to meet an estimated combined average emissions level of 250 grams of carbon dioxide per mile, equivalent to 35.5 miles per gallon if the automobile industry were to meet this carbon dioxide level solely through fuel economy improvements. Together, these standards would cut carbon dioxide emissions by an estimated 960 million metric tons and 1.8 billion barrels of oil over the lifetime of the vehicles sold under the program (model years 2012-2016). The second phase of the national program would involve proposing new fuel economy and greenhouse gas standards for model years 2017 – 2025 by September 1, 2011.
13 Date Palm Apartments
Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Study
City of Cathedral City, CA Regulatory Framework and Background On October 25, 2010, the EPA and the U.S. Department of Transportation proposed the first national standards to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and improve fuel efficiency of heavy-duty trucks and buses. For combination tractors, the agencies are proposing engine and vehicle standards that begin in the 2014 model year and achieve up to a 20 percent reduction in carbon dioxide emissions and fuel consumption by the 2018 model year. For heavy-duty pickup trucks and vans, the agencies are proposing separate gasoline and diesel truck standards, which phase in starting in the 2014 model year and achieve up to a 10 percent reduction for gasoline vehicles and 15 percent reduction for diesel vehicles by 2018 model year (12 and 17 percent respectively if accounting for air conditioning leakage).
Lastly, for vocational vehicles, the agencies are proposing engine and vehicle standards starting in the 2014 model year which would achieve up to a 10 percent reduction in fuel consumption and carbon dioxide emissions by 2018 model year.
Issued by NHTSA and EPA in March 2020 (published on April 30, 2020 and effective after June 29, 2020), the Safer Affordable Fuel-Efficient Vehicles Rule would maintain the Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) and CO2 standards applicable in model year 2020 for model years 2021 through 2026.
The estimated CAFE and CO2 standards for model year 2020 are 43.7 mpg and 204 grams of CO2 per mile for passenger cars and 31.3 mpg and 284 grams of CO2 per mile for light trucks, projecting an overall industry average of 37 mpg, as compared to 46.7 mpg under the standards issued in 2012. This Rule also excludes CO2- equivalent emission improvements associated with air conditioning refrigerants and leakage (and, optionally, offsets for nitrous oxide and methane emissions) after model year 2020.
1 Mandatory Reporting of Greenhouse Gases. On January 1, 2010, the EPA started requiring large emitters of heat-trapping emissions to begin collecting GHG data under a new reporting system. Under the rule, suppliers of fossil fuels or industrial greenhouse gases, manufacturers of vehicles and engines, and facilities that emit 25,000 metric tons or more per year of greenhouse gas emissions are required to submit annual reports to the EPA.
Climate Adaption Plan. The EPA Plan identifies priority actions the Agency will take to incorporate considerations of climate change into its programs, policies, rules and operations to ensure they are effective under future climatic conditions. The following link provides more information on the EPA Plan: https://www.epa.gov/arc-x/planning-climate-change-adaptation
2.2.3 California
California Code of Regulations (CCR) Title 24, Part 6. CCR Title 24, Part 6: California’s Energy Efficiency Standards for Residential and Nonresidential Buildings (Title 24) were first established in 1978 in response to a legislative mandate to reduce California’s energy consumption. The standards are updated periodically to allow consideration and possible incorporation of new energy efficiency 1 National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), 2018. Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 165 / Friday, August 24, 2018 / Proposed Rules, The Safer Affordable Fuel-Efficient (SAFE) Vehicles Rule for Model Years 2021–2026 Passenger Cars and Light Trucks 2018. Available at: https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2018-08-24/pdf/2018-16820.pdf. 14 Date Palm Apartments
Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Study
City of Cathedral City, CA Regulatory Framework and Background technologies and methods. Although it was not originally intended to reduce GHG emissions, electricity production by fossil fuels results in GHG emissions and energy efficient buildings require less electricity. Therefore, increased energy efficiency results in decreased GHG emissions.
The Energy Commission adopted 2008 Standards on April 23, 2008 and Building Standards Commission approved them for publication on September 11, 2008. These updates became effective on August 1, 2009. 2013, 2016, and 2019 standards have been approved and became effective July 1, 2014, January 1, 2016, and January 1, 2020, respectively.
California Code of Regulations (CCR) Title 24, Part 11. All buildings for which an application for a building permit is submitted on or after January 1, 2023 must follow the 2022 standards. Energy efficient buildings require less electricity; therefore, increased energy efficiency reduces fossil fuel consumption and decreases greenhouse gas emissions. The following links provide more information on Title 24, Part 11:
https://www.dgs.ca.gov/BSC/Codes
https://www.energy.ca.gov/programs-and-topics/programs/building-energy-efficiency-standards/2022- building-energy-efficiency
California Green Building Standards On January 12, 2010, the State Building Standards Commission unanimously adopted updates to the California Green Building Standards Code, which went into effect on January 1, 2011. The Housing and Community Development (HCD) updated CALGreen through the 2015 Triennial Code Adoption Cycle, during the 2016 to 2017 fiscal year. During the 2022-2023 fiscal year, the Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) updated CALGreen through the 2023 Triennial Code Adoption Cycle.
The Code is a comprehensive and uniform regulatory code for all residential, commercial and school buildings. CCR Title 24, Part 11: California Green Building Standards (Title 24) became effective in 2001 in response to continued efforts to reduce GHG emissions associated with energy consumption. CCR Title 24, Part 11 now require that new buildings reduce water consumption, employ building commissioning to increase building system efficiencies, divert construction waste from landfills, and install low pollutant-emitting finish materials. One focus of CCR Title 24, Part 11 is water conservation measures, which reduce GHG emissions by reducing electrical consumption associated with pumping and treating water. CCR Title 24, Part 11 has approximately 52 nonresidential mandatory measures and an additional 130 provisions for optional use. Some key mandatory measures for commercial occupancies include specified parking for clean air vehicles, a 20 percent reduction of potable water use within buildings, a 50 percent construction waste diversion from landfills, use of building finish materials that emit low levels of volatile organic compounds, and commissioning for new, nonresidential buildings over 10,000 square feet.
The CEC estimates that over 30 years the 2022 Energy Code will provide $1.5 billion in consumer benefits and reduce 10 million metric tons of GHG. Changes compared to the 2019 Energy Code include increases to on-site renewable energy generation from solar, increases to electric load flexibility to support grid reliability, reduction of emissions from newly constructed buildings, reduction 15 Date Palm Apartments
Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Study
City of Cathedral City, CA Regulatory Framework and Background of air pollution for improved public health, and increased adoption of environmentally beneficial efficient electric technologies.
The California Green Building Standards Code does not prevent a local jurisdiction from adopting a more stringent code as state law provides methods for local enhancements. The Code recognizes that many jurisdictions have developed existing construction and demolition ordinances, and defers to them as the ruling guidance provided they provide a minimum 50-percent diversion requirement. The code also provides exemptions for areas not served by construction and demolition recycling infrastructure. State building code provides the minimum standard that buildings need to meet in order to be certified for occupancy. Enforcement is generally through the local building official. The following link provides more on CalGreen Building Standards:
http://www.bsc.ca.gov/Home/CALGreen.aspx
Executive Order S-3-05. California Governor issued Executive Order S-3-05, GHG Emission, in June 2005, which established the following targets:
•
•
•
By 2010, California shall reduce greenhouse gas emissions to 2000 levels; By 2020, California shall reduce greenhouse gas emissions to 1990 levels.
By 2050, California shall reduce greenhouse gas emissions to 80 percent below 1990 levels.
The executive order directed the secretary of the California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA) to coordinate a multi-agency effort to reduce GHG emissions to the target levels. To comply with the Executive Order, the secretary of CalEPA created the California Climate Action Team (CAT), made up of members from various state agencies and commissions. The team released its first report in March 2006. The report proposed to achieve the targets by building on the voluntary actions of businesses, local governments, and communities and through State incentive and regulatory programs.
Executive Order S-01-07. Executive Order S-1-07 was issued in 2007 and proclaims that the transportation sector is the main source of GHG emissions in the State, since it generates more than 40 percent of the State’s GHG emissions. It establishes a goal to reduce the carbon intensity of transportation fuels sold in the State by at least ten percent by 2020. This Order also directs CARB to determine whether this Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS) could be adopted as a discrete early-action measure as part of the effort to meet the mandates in AB 32.
On April 23, 2009 CARB approved the proposed regulation to implement the low carbon fuel standard and began implementation on January 1, 2011. The low carbon fuel standard is anticipated to reduce GHG emissions by about 16 MMT per year by 2020. CARB approved some amendments to the LCFS in December 2011, which were implemented on January 1, 2013. In September 2015, the Board approved the re-adoption of the LCFS, which became effective on January 1, 2016, to address procedural deficiencies in the way the original regulation was adopted. In 2018, the Board approved amendments to the regulation, which included strengthening and smoothing the carbon intensity benchmarks through 2030 in-line with California's 2030 GHG emission reduction target enacted 16 Date Palm Apartments
Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Study
City of Cathedral City, CA Regulatory Framework and Background through SB 32, adding new crediting opportunities to promote zero emission vehicle adoption, alternative jet fuel, carbon capture and sequestration, and advanced technologies to achieve deep decarbonization in the transportation sector.
The LCFS is designed to encourage the use of cleaner low-carbon transportation fuels in California, encourage the production of those fuels, and therefore, reduce GHG emissions and decrease petroleum dependence in the transportation sector. Separate standards are established for gasoline and diesel fuels and the alternative fuels that can replace each. The standards are “back-loaded”, with more reductions required in the last five years, than the first five years. This schedule allows for the development of advanced fuels that are lower in carbon than today’s fuels and the market penetration of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles, battery electric vehicles, fuel cell vehicles, and flexible fuel vehicles.
It is anticipated that compliance with the low carbon fuel standard will be based on a combination of both lower carbon fuels and more efficient vehicles.
Reformulated gasoline mixed with corn-derived ethanol at ten percent by volume and low sulfur diesel fuel represent the baseline fuels. Lower carbon fuels may be ethanol, biodiesel, renewable diesel, or blends of these fuels with gasoline or diesel as appropriate. Compressed natural gas and liquefied natural gas also may be low carbon fuels. Hydrogen and electricity, when used in fuel cells or electric vehicles are also considered as low carbon fuels for the low carbon fuel standard.
SB 97. Senate Bill 97 (SB 97) was adopted August 2007 and acknowledges that climate change is a prominent environmental issue that requires analysis under CEQA. SB 97 directed the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR), which is part of the State Resource Agency, to prepare, develop, and transmit to CARB guidelines for the feasible mitigation of GHG emissions or the effects of GHG emissions, as required by CEQA, by July 1, 2009. The Resources Agency was required to certify and adopt those guidelines by January 1, 2010.
Pursuant to the requirements of SB 97 as stated above, on December 30, 2009 the Natural Resources Agency adopted amendments to the state CEQA guidelines that address GHG emissions. The CEQA Guidelines Amendments changed 14 sections of the CEQA Guidelines and incorporate GHG language throughout the Guidelines. However, no GHG emissions thresholds of significance are provided and no specific mitigation measures are identified. The GHG emission reduction amendments went into effect on March 18, 2010 and are summarized below:
•
•
Climate action plans and other greenhouse gas reduction plans can be used to determine whether a project has significant impacts, based upon its compliance with the plan.
Local governments are encouraged to quantify the greenhouse gas emissions of proposed projects, noting that they have the freedom to select the models and methodologies that best meet their needs and circumstances. The section also recommends consideration of several qualitative factors that may be used in the determination of significance, such as the extent to which the given project complies with state, regional, or local GHG reduction plans and policies. OPR does not set or dictate specific thresholds of significance. Consistent with existing CEQA Guidelines, OPR 17 Date Palm Apartments
Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Study
City of Cathedral City, CA Regulatory Framework and Background encourages local governments to develop and publish their own thresholds of significance for GHG impacts assessment.
When creating their own thresholds of significance, local governments may consider the thresholds of significance adopted or recommended by other public agencies, or recommended by experts.
New amendments include guidelines for determining methods to mitigate the effects of greenhouse gas emissions in Appendix F of the CEQA Guidelines.
OPR is clear to state that “to qualify as mitigation, specific measures from an existing plan must be identified and incorporated into the project; general compliance with a plan, by itself, is not mitigation.”
•
•
•
•
•
OPR’s emphasizes the advantages of analyzing GHG impacts on an institutional, programmatic level. OPR therefore approves tiering of environmental analyses and highlights some benefits of such an approach.
Environmental impact reports (EIRs) must specifically consider a project's energy use and energy efficiency potential.
AB 32. The California State Legislature enacted AB 32, the California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006. AB 32 requires that greenhouse gases emitted in California be reduced to 1990 levels by the year 2020. “Greenhouse gases” as defined under AB 32 include carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, hydrofluorocarbons, perfluorocarbons, and sulfur hexafluoride. ARB is the state agency charged with monitoring and regulating sources of greenhouse gases. AB 32 states the following:
Global warming poses a serious threat to the economic well-being, public health, natural resources, and the environment of California. The potential adverse impacts of global warming include the exacerbation of air quality problems, a reduction in the quality and supply of water to the state from the Sierra snowpack, a rise in sea levels resulting in the displacement of thousands of coastal businesses and residences, damage to marine ecosystems and the natural environment, and an increase in the incidences of infectious diseases, asthma, and other human health-related problems.
The ARB Board approved the 1990 greenhouse gas emissions level of 427 million metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent (MMTCO2e) on December 6, 2007 (California Air Resources Board 2007).
Therefore, emissions generated in California in 2020 are required to be equal to or less than 427 MMTCO2e. Emissions in 2020 in a “business as usual” scenario are estimated to be 596 MMTCO2e.
Under AB 32, the ARB published its Final Expanded List of Early Action Measures to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions in California. Discrete early action measures are currently underway or are enforceable by January 1, 2010. The ARB has 44 early action measures that apply to the transportation, commercial, forestry, agriculture, cement, oil and gas, fire suppression, fuels, education, energy efficiency, electricity, and waste sectors. Of these early action measures, nine are considered discrete early action measures, as they are regulatory and enforceable by January 1, 2010.
The ARB estimates that the 44 recommendations are expected to result in reductions of at least 42 MMTCO2e by 2020, representing approximately 25 percent of the 2020 target.
The ARB’s Climate Change Scoping Plan (Scoping Plan) contains measures designed to reduce the State’s emissions to 1990 levels by the year 2020 (California Air Resources Board 2008). The Scoping Plan identifies recommended measures for multiple greenhouse gas emission sectors and the 18 Date Palm Apartments
Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Study
City of Cathedral City, CA Regulatory Framework and Background associated emission reductions needed to achieve the year 2020 emissions target—each sector has a different emission reduction target. Most of the measures target the transportation and electricity sectors. As stated in the Scoping Plan, the key elements of the strategy for achieving the 2020 greenhouse gas target include:
• Expanding and strengthening existing energy efficiency programs as well as building and appliance standards;
•
•
Achieving a statewide renewables energy mix of 33 percent; Developing a California cap-and-trade program that links with other Western Climate Initiative partner programs to create a regional market system;
•
•
Establishing targets for transportation-related greenhouse gas emissions for regions throughout California and pursuing policies and incentives to achieve those targets; Adopting and implementing measures pursuant to existing State laws and policies, Including California’s clean car standards, goods movement measures, and the Low Carbon Fuel Standard; and
• Creating targeted fees, including a public goods charge on water use, fees on high global warming potential gases, and a fee to fund the administrative costs of the State’s long-term commitment to AB 32 implementation.
In addition, the Scoping Plan differentiates between “capped” and “uncapped” strategies. “Capped” strategies are subject to the proposed cap-and-trade program. The Scoping Plan states that the inclusion of these emissions within the cap-and trade program will help ensure that the year 2020 emission targets are met despite some degree of uncertainty in the emission reduction estimates for any individual measure. Implementation of the capped strategies is calculated to achieve a sufficient amount of reductions by 2020 to achieve the emission target contained in AB 32. “Uncapped” strategies that will not be subject to the cap-and-trade emissions caps and requirements are provided as a margin of safety by accounting for additional greenhouse gas emission reductions.4 Senate Bill 100. Senate Bill 100 (SB 100) requires 100 percent of total retail sales of electricity in California to come from eligible renewable energy resources and zero-carbon resources by December 31, 2045. SB 100 was adopted September 2018.
The interim thresholds from prior Senate Bills and Executive Orders would also remain in effect. These include Senate Bill 1078 (SB 1078), which requires retail sellers of electricity, including investor-owned utilities and community choice aggregators, to provide at least 20 percent of their supply from renewable sources by 2017. Senate Bill 107 (SB 107) which changed the target date to 2010. Executive Order S-14-08, which was signed on November 2008 and expanded the State’s Renewable Energy Standard to 33 percent renewable energy by 2020. Executive Order S-21-09 directed the CARB to adopt regulations by July 31, 2010 to enforce S-14-08. Senate Bill X1-2 codifies the 33 percent renewable energy requirement by 2020.
19 Date Palm Apartments
Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Study
City of Cathedral City, CA Regulatory Framework and Background SB 375. Senate Bill 375 (SB 375) was adopted September 2008 and aligns regional transportation planning efforts, regional GHG emission reduction targets, and land use and housing allocation. SB 375 requires Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPO) to adopt a sustainable communities strategy (SCS) or alternate planning strategy (APS) that will prescribe land use allocation in that MPOs Regional Transportation Plan (RTP). CARB, in consultation with each MPO, will provide each affected region with reduction targets for GHGs emitted by passenger cars and light trucks in the region for the years 2020 and 2035. These reduction targets will be updated every eight years but can be updated every four years if advancements in emissions technologies affect the reduction strategies to achieve the targets. CARB is also charged with reviewing each MPO’s sustainable communities strategy or alternate planning strategy for consistency with its assigned targets.
The proposed project is located within the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), which has authority to develop the SCS or APS. For the SCAG region, the targets set by CARB are at eight percent below 2005 per capita GHG emissions levels by 2020 and 13 percent below 2005 per capita GHG emissions levels by 2035. On April 4, 2012, SCAG adopted the 2012-2035 Regional Transportation Plan / Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS), which meets the CARB emission reduction requirements.
On September 3, 2020, SCAG’s Regional Council approved and fully adopted the Connect SoCal (2020– 2045 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy), and the addendum to the Connect SoCal Program Environmental Impact Report. Connect SoCal is a long-range visioning plan that builds upon and expands land use and transportation strategies established over several planning cycles to increase mobility options and achieve a more sustainable growth pattern. Connect SoCal outlines more than $638 billion in transportation system investments through 2045. Connect SoCal is supported by a combination of transportation and land use strategies that help the region achieve state greenhouse gas emission reduction goals and federal Clean Air Act requirements, preserve open space areas, improve public health and roadway safety, support our vital goods movement industry and utilize resources more efficiently. By integrating the Forecasted Development Pattern with a suite of financially constrained transportation investments, Connect SoCal can reach the regional target of reducing greenhouse gases, or GHGs, from autos and light-duty trucks by 8 percent per capita by 2020, and 19 percent by 2035 (compared to 2005 levels).
City and County land use policies, including General Plans, are not required to be consistent with the RTP and associated SCS or APS. However, new provisions of CEQA would incentivize, through streamlining and other provisions, qualified projects that are consistent with an approved SCS or APS and categorized as “transit priority projects.”
Assembly Bill 939, Assembly Bill 341, and Senate Bill 1374. Assembly Bill 939 (AB 939) requires that each jurisdiction in California to divert at least 50 percent of its waste away from landfills, whether through waste reduction, recycling or other means. AB 341 requires at least 75 percent of generated waste be source reduced, recycled, or composted by the year 2020. Senate Bill 1374 (SB 1374) requires the California Integrated Waste Management Board to adopt a model ordinance by March 1, 20 Date Palm Apartments
Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Study
City of Cathedral City, CA Regulatory Framework and Background 2004 suitable for adoption by any local agency to require 50 to 75 percent diversion of construction and demolition of waste materials from landfills.
Executive Order S-13-08. Executive Order S-13-08 indicates that “climate change in California during the next century is expected to shift precipitation patterns, accelerate sea level rise and increase temperatures, thereby posing a serious threat to California’s economy, to the health and welfare of its population and to its natural resources.” Pursuant to the requirements in the order, the 2009 California Climate Adaptation Strategy (California Natural Resource Agency 2009) was adopted, which is the “… first statewide, multi-sector, region-specific, and information-based climate change in California, identifying and exploring strategies to adapt to climate change, and specifying a direction for future research.
Executive Order B-30-15. Executive Order B-30-15, establishing a new interim statewide greenhouse gas emission reduction target to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030, was signed by Governor Brown in April 2015.
Executive Order B-29-15. Executive Order B-29-15, mandates a statewide 25% reduction in potable water usage and was signed into law on April 1, 2015.
Executive Order B-37-16. Executive Order B-37-16, continuing the State’s adopted water reduction, was signed into law on May 9, 2016. The water reduction builds off the mandatory 25% reduction called for in EO B-29-15.
Executive Order N-79-20. Executive Order N-79-20 was signed into law on September 23, 2020 and mandates 100 percent of in-state sales of new passenger cars and trucks be zero-emission by 2035; 100 percent of medium- and heavy-duty vehicles in the state be zero-emission vehicles by 2045 for all operations where feasible and by 2035 for drayage trucks; and to transition to 100 percent zeroemission off-road vehicles and equipment by 2035 where feasible.
2.2.4 South Coast Air Quality Management District
The Project is within the Salton Sea Air Basin, which is under the jurisdiction of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). SCAQMD Regulation XXVII currently includes three rules:
•
•
The purpose of Rule 2700 is to define terms and post global warming potentials.
The purpose of Rule 2701, SoCal Climate Solutions Exchange, is to establish a voluntary program to encourage, quantify, and certify voluntary, high quality certified greenhouse gas emission reductions in the SCAQMD.
• Rule 2702, Greenhouse Gas Reduction Program, was adopted on February 6, 2009. The purpose of this rule is to create a Greenhouse Gas Reduction Program for greenhouse gas emission reductions in the SCAQMD. The SCAQMD will fund projects through contracts in response to requests for proposals or purchase reductions from other parties.
SCAQMD Threshold Development
21 Date Palm Apartments
Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Study
City of Cathedral City, CA Regulatory Framework and Background The SCAQMD has established recommended significance thresholds for greenhouse gases for local lead agency consideration (“SCAQMD draft local agency threshold”). SCAQMD has published a five-tiered draft GHG threshold which includes a 10,000 metric ton of CO2e per year for stationary/industrial sources and 3,000 metric tons of CO2e per year significance threshold for residential/commercial projects (South Coast Air Quality Management District 2010c). Tier 3 is anticipated to be the primary tier by which the SCAQMD will determine significance for projects. The Tier 3 screening level for stationary sources is based on an emission capture rate of 90 percent for all new or modified projects.
A 90-precent emission capture rate means that 90 percent of total emissions from all new or modified stationary source projects would be subject to CEQA analysis. The 90-percent capture rate GHG significance screening level in Tier 3 for stationary sources was derived using the SCAQMD’s annual Emissions Reporting Program.
The current draft thresholds consist of the following tiered approach:
•
•
Tier 1 consists of evaluating whether or not the project qualifies for any applicable exemption under CEQA.
Tier 2 consists of determining whether or not the project is consistent with a greenhouse gas reduction plan. If a project is consistent with a qualifying local greenhouse gas reduction plan, it does not have significant greenhouse gas emissions.
•
•
•
Tier 3 consists of screening values, which the lead agency can choose but must be consistent. A project’s construction emissions are averaged over 30 years and are added to a project’s operational emissions. If a project’s emissions are under one of the following screening thresholds, then the project is less than significant:
- All land use types: 3,000 MTCO2e per year
- Based on land use types: residential is 3,500 MTCO2e per year; commercial is 1,400 MTCO2e per year; and mixed use is 3,000 MTCO2e per year
Tier 4 has the following options:
- Option 1: Reduce emissions from business as usual by a certain percentage; this percentage is currently undefined
- Option 2: Early implementation of applicable AB 32 Scoping Plan measures - Option 3: Year 2020 target for service populations (SP), which includes residents and employees: 4.8 MTCO2e/SP/year for projects and 6.6 MTCO2e/SP/year for plans; - Option 3, 2035 target: 3.0 MTCO2e/SP/year for projects and 4.1 MTCO2e/SP/year for plans Tier 5 involves mitigation offsets to achieve target significance threshold.
2.2.5 Local
County of Riverside Climate Action Plan
The County of Riverside’s Climate Action Plan Update (CAP) was completed in November 2019. The CAP Update describes Riverside County’s GHG emissions for the year 2017, projects how these 22 Date Palm Apartments
Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Study
City of Cathedral City, CA Regulatory Framework and Background emissions will increase into 2020, 2030, and 2050, and includes strategies to reduce emissions to a level consistent with the State of California’s emissions reduction targets. The CAP Update sets a target to reduce community-wide GHG emission emissions by 15 percent from 2008 levels by 2020, 49 percent by 2030, and 83 percent by 2050.
Appendix D of the Riverside County CAP Update also states that project's that do not exceed the CAP's screening threshold of 3,000 MTCO2e per year are considered to have less than significant GHG emissions and are in compliance with the County's CAP Update. Therefore, to determine whether the project's GHG emissions are significant, this analysis uses the County of Riverside CAP Update screening threshold of 3,000 MTCO2e per year for all land use types. Projects that do not exceed emissions of 3,000 MTCO2e per year are also required to include the following efficiency measures:
•
•
Energy efficiency matching or exceeding the Title 24 requirements in effect as of January 2017, and
Water conservation measures that matches the California Green Building Code in effect as of January 2017.
Projects that exceed emissions of 3,000 MTCO2e per year are also required to use Screening Tables.
Projects that garner at least 100 points will be consistent with the reduction quantities anticipated in the County’s CAP Update. Consistent with CEQA Guidelines, such projects would be determined to have a less than significant individual and cumulative impact for GHG emissions. Those projects that do not garner 100 points using the Screening Tables will need to provide additional analysis to determine the significance of GHG emissions.
In order to meet the state-wide efficiency metric targets, the CAP must demonstrate that it can reduce community-wide emissions to 6.6 MT CO2e/SP (or 944,737 MT CO2e total based on an estimated 2020 service population of 143,142) by 2020 and 4.4 MT CO2e/SP (or 1,334,243 MT CO2e based on an estimated 2030 service population of 303,237) by 2030.
Therefore, to determine whether the project's GHG emissions are significant, this analysis uses the County of Riverside CAP Update GHG Screening Tables.
The project will be subject to the latest requirements of the California Green Building and Title 24 Energy Efficiency Standards (currently 2022) which would reduce project-related greenhouse gas emissions.
City of Cathedral City Climate Action Plan
A Climate Action Plan (CAP) was adopted by the City of Cathedral City in May of 2013. The City of Cathedral City Climate Action Plan was set in place to guide the City in decisions that lead to the largest and most cost-effective emissions reductions. This plan sets forth goals to reduce emissions to achieve 23 Date Palm Apartments
Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Study
City of Cathedral City, CA Regulatory Framework and Background the targets of AB 32. The Climate Action Plan identifies that the community will have to reach a 23.4% reduction from Year 2010 baseline emissions by the year 2020 in order to obtain the AB 32 target emissions. These CAP targets are based on a predicted population growth rate of 19 percent between 2010 and 2020. However, according to the Census Bureau
2 , the population of Cathedral City was
estimated to be 51,200 in April 2010 and 55,007 in July 2019; which shows a growth rate of only 7.4 percent.
The City of Cathedral City has identified 77 measures to be implemented over the course of an eightyear period, beginning in 2013, in order to achieve their emission reduction goals. The City promotes energy efficiency and conservation in all areas of community development, including transportation, development planning, and public and private sector construction and operation, as well as in the full range of residential and non-residential projects. The City supports public and private efforts to develop and operate alternative systems of solar and electric production that take advantage of local renewable resources. In addition, the Climate Action Plan discusses the ability to develop and implement a solar ready ordinance that would require all new buildings and homes to be prepared for solar install. The Climate Action Plan also promotes the use of drought tolerate desert landscaping for parks, recreational facilities and golf courses.
Therefore, to determine whether the project's GHG emissions are significant, this analysis uses the County of Riverside GHG Screening Tables.
The project will be subject to the latest requirements of the California Green Building and Title 24 Energy Efficiency Standards (currently 2022) which would reduce project-related greenhouse gas emissions.
https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/cathedralcitycitycalifornia,US/PST045219 2 24 Date Palm Apartments
Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Study
City of Cathedral City, CA Setting
3.0 Setting
3.1 Existing Physical Setting
The project site is located in the City of Cathedral City within the County of Riverside, which is part of the Salton Sea Air Basin (SSAB). The middle part of Riverside County (between San Gorgonio Pass and Joshua Tree National Monument), belongs in the Salton Sea Air Basin (SSAB), along with Imperial County. The SSAB portion of Riverside County is separated from the South Coast Air Basin region by the San Jacinto Mountains and from the Mojave Desert Air Basin to the east by the Little San Bernardino Mountains.
3.1.1 Local Climate and Meteorology
During the summer, the SSAB is generally influenced by a Pacific Subtropical High Cell that sits off the coast, inhibiting cloud formation and encouraging daytime solar heating. The SSAB is rarely influenced by cold air masses moving south from Canada and Alaska, as these systems are weak and diffuse by the time they reach the desert. Most desert moisture arrives from infrequent warm, moist, and unstable air masses from the south. The SSAB averages between three and seven inches of precipitation per year.
The Coachella Valley is a geographically and meteorologically unique area wholly contained within the Salton Sea Air Basin. The region is currently impacted by significant air pollution levels caused by the transport of pollutants from coastal air basins to the west, primarily ozone, and locally generated PM10. The mountains surrounding the region isolate the Valley from coastal influences and create a hot and dry low-lying desert (see Table 3). As the desert heats up it draws cooler coastal air through the narrow San Gorgonio Pass, generating strong and sustained winds that cross the fluvial (water caused) and aeolian (wind) erosion zones in the Valley. These strong winds suspend and transport large quantities of sand and dust, reducing visibility, damaging property, and constituting a significant health threat.
The temperature and precipitation levels for the City of Palm Springs, closest monitoring station to the project site, are in Table 3. Table 3 shows that July is typically the warmest month and December is typically the coolest month. Rainfall in the project area varies considerably in both time and space.
Almost all the annual rainfall comes from the fringes of mid-latitude storms from late November to early April, with summers being almost completely dry.
<Table 3, next page>
25 Date Palm Apartments
Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Study
City of Cathedral City, CA Setting
Table 3: Meteorological Summary
Temperature (˚F) Average Precipitation Month
Average High (inches)
69.6 Average Low
42.1 45.3
48.6 54
January 1.14
1.02 0.59
0.17 0.05
0.06 0.2
February
March
73.6 79.4
86.9 94.4
103.1
108.3
106.9
101.8
91.6 April
May
June
July
60.2 66.7
74.8 74.2
67.9 59.2
48.8 42.1
57 August
September
October
November
December
0.3 0.34
0.26 0.47
0.93 5.53
78.7 70.1
Annual Average 88.7
Notes:
1 Source: https://wrcc.dri.edu/cgi-bin/cliMAIN.pl?caplms+sca
3.1.2 Local Air Quality
The SCAQMD has divided the South Coast Air Basin into 38 air-monitoring areas with a designated ambient air monitoring station representative of each area. The project is within Source Receptor Area 30, Coachella Valley. SCAQMD operates the Palm Springs air monitoring station approximately 5.1 miles northwest of the project site. The Palm Springs monitoring station was used to collect monitoring data; however, these locations do not provide all ambient weather data. Therefore, additional data was pulled from the SCAQMD historical data for the Coachella Valley Area (Area 30) for both sulfur dioxide and carbon monoxide to provide the existing levels. Table 4 presents the monitored pollutant levels within the vicinity. However, it should be noted that due to the air monitoring station distance from the project site, recorded air pollution levels at the air monitoring station reflect with varying degrees of accuracy, local air quality conditions at the project site. <Table 4, next page>
26 Date Palm Apartments
Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Study
City of Cathedral City, CA Setting
Table 4: Local Area Air Quality Levels from Palm Springs Air Monitoring Station1 Year
Pollutant (Standard) 2021 2 2020 2022
Ozone:
Maximum 1-Hour Concentration (ppm)
Days > CAAQS (0.09 ppm)
0.119
9 0.110
10 0.106
7 Maximum 8-Hour Concentration (ppm)
Days > NAAQS (0.07 ppm)
0.094
49 0.092
35 0.089
39 Days > CAAQS (0.070 ppm)
Carbon Monoxide:
53 38 43
Maximum 1-Hour Concentration (ppm)
Days > NAAQS (20 ppm)
Maximum 8-Hour Concentration (ppm)
Days > NAAQS (9 ppm)
0.8 0
0.5 0
0.8 0
0.4 0
-
-
-
-
Nitrogen Dioxide:
Maximum 1-Hour Concentration (ppm)
Days > NAAQS (0.25 ppm)
0.047
0 0.036
0 0.038
0 Sulfur Dioxide:3
Maximum 1-Hour Concentration (ppm)
Days > CAAQS (0.25 ppm)
-
-
-
-
-
-
Inhalable Particulates (PM10):
Maximum 24-Hour Concentration (ug/m3)
Days > NAAQS (150 ug/m3)
Days > CAAQS (50 ug/m3)
129.8
0 0
35.2 0
0 159.5
1 3
Annual Average (ug/m3) 23.2
No
Yes
18.4 No
No
21.1 No
Yes
Annual > NAAQS (50 ug/m3)
Annual > CAAQS (20 ug/m3)
Ultra-Fine Particulates (PM2.5):
Maximum 24-Hour Concentration (ug/m3)
Days > NAAQS (35 ug/m3)
23.9 0
13.5 0
31.2 0
Annual Average (ug/m3)
Annual > NAAQS (15 ug/m3)
Annual > CAAQS (12 ug/m3)
6.4 No
No
6.2 No
No
6.3 No
No
1. Source: obtained from https://www.aqmd.gov/home/air-quality/air-quality-data-studies/historical-data-by-year and /or https://www.arb.ca.gov/adam/topfour/topfour1.php.
2 CAAQS = California Ambient Air Quality Standard; NAAQS = National Ambient Air Quality Standard; ppm = parts per million 3 No data available.
The monitoring data presented in Table 4 shows that ozone is the air pollutant of primary concern in the project area, which are detailed below.
Ozone
During the 2020 to 2022 monitoring period, the State 1-hour concentration standard for ozone has been exceeded between seven and ten days each year at the Palm Springs Station. The State 8-hour ozone standard has been exceeded between 38 and 53 days each year over the past three years at the Palm Springs Station. The Federal 8-hour ozone standard has been exceeded between 35 and 49 days each year over the past three years at the Palm Springs Station. 27 Date Palm Apartments
Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Study
City of Cathedral City, CA Setting
Ozone is a secondary pollutant as it is not directly emitted. Ozone is the result of chemical reactions between other pollutants, most importantly hydrocarbons and NO2, which occur only in the presence of bright sunlight. Pollutants emitted from upwind cities react during transport downwind to produce the oxidant concentrations experienced in the area. Many areas of the SCAQMD contribute to the ozone levels experienced at the monitoring station, with the more significant areas being those directly upwind.
Carbon Monoxide
CO is another important pollutant that is due mainly to motor vehicles. During the 2020 to 2022 monitoring period, the Federal 1-hour and 8-hour concentration standards for CO were not exceeded.
Nitrogen Dioxide
During the 2020 to 2022 monitoring period, the Federal 1-hour concentration standard for Nitrogen Dioazide has not been exceeded.
Sulfur Dioxide
The Coachella Valley Area did not have SO2 data available for the last three years.
Particulate Matter
During the 2020 to 2022 monitoring period, the Palm Springs Station recorded one day of exceedance of the Federal 24-hour PM10 concentration standard and three days of exceedance in the State PM10 annual average standard, both in 2022.
During the same period, the Palm Springs Station did not record an exceedance of the Federal 24-hour standard for PM2.5.
According to the EPA, some people are much more sensitive than others to breathing fine particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5). People with influenza, chronic respiratory and cardiovascular diseases, and the elderly may suffer worsening illness and premature death due to breathing these fine particles.
People with bronchitis can expect aggravated symptoms from breathing in fine particles. Children may experience decline in lung function due to breathing in PM10 and PM2.5. Other groups considered sensitive are smokers and people who cannot breathe well through their noses. Exercising athletes are also considered sensitive because many breathe through their mouths during exercise.
3.1.3 Attainment Status
The EPA and the ARB designate air basins where ambient air quality standards are exceeded as “nonattainment” areas. If standards are met, the area is designated as an “attainment” area. If there is inadequate or inconclusive data to make a definitive attainment designation, they are considered “unclassified.” National nonattainment areas are further designated as marginal, moderate, serious, severe, or extreme as a function of deviation from standards. Each standard has a different definition, or ‘form’ of what constitutes attainment, based on specific air quality statistics. For example, the Federal 8-hour CO standard is not to be exceeded more than once per year; therefore, an area is in 28 Date Palm Apartments
Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Study
City of Cathedral City, CA Setting
attainment of the CO standard if no more than one 8-hour ambient air monitoring values exceeds the threshold per year. In contrast, the federal annual PM2.5 standard is met if the three-year average of the annual average PM2.5 concentration is less than or equal to the standard. Table 5 lists the attainment status for the criteria pollutants in the basin.
Table 5: Coachella Valley Portion of the Salton Sea Air Basin Attainment Status National
Standards1
Pollutant Averaging Time Attainment Date2
11/15/2007
(Attained 12/31/2013)
California Standards2
Nonattainment 1-Hour
(0.12 ppm)
1-Hour (0.09 ppm)
8-Hour
1979
1-Hour Ozone3
Attainment
- - Nonattainment
2015
8-Hour Ozone4
2008
8-Hour Ozone4
1997
8-Hour Ozone4
Pending - Expect
Nonattainment (Severe)
Nonattainment
(Severe-15)
Pending
7/20/2027
6/15/2019
-
Nonattainment (0.070 ppm)
8-Hour
(0.075 ppm)
8-Hour
-
Nonattainment
(Severe-15) -
(0.08 ppm)
1-Hour (20 ppm)
8-hour (9.0 ppm)
1-Hour (35 ppm)
8-Hour (9 ppm)
1-hour (0.18 ppm) Annual
(0.03 ppm)
1-Hour (100 ppb)
Annual (0.053 ppm)
1-Hour (0.25 ppm)
24-Hour (0.04 ppm)
1-Hour (75 ppb)
24-Hour (0.14 ppm)
Annual (0.03 ppm)
24-Hour (50 µg/m3) Annual
(20 50 µg/m3)
- Attainment
CO Unclassifiable/
Attainment N/A (attained)
-
-
- Attainment
-
NO2
7 Unclassifiable/
Attainment N/A (attained)
- -
N/A
Attainment
SO2
8 Designations Pending
Unclassifiable/
Attainment
-
Unclassifiable/Attainment
- - Nonattainment
PM106
PM2.55
24-Hour
(150 µg/m3)
Annual (12.0 µg/m3)
Nonattainment
(Serious) 12/31/2006 -
- - Attainment
-
Unclassifiable/
Attainment
Unclassifiable/
Attainment
24-Hour (35 µg/m3) N/A (attained)
3-Months Rolling
(0.15 µg/m3)
Lead Unclassifiable/Attainment Attainment
Notes:
1 Obtained from 2016 AQMP, SCAQMD, 2016. EPA often only declares Nonattainment areas; everywhere else is listed as Unclassified/Attainment or Unclassifiable.
2 A design value below the NAAQS for data through the full year or smog season prior to the attainment date is typically required for attainment demonstration.
3 The 1979 1-hour ozone NAAQS (0.12 ppm) was revoked, effective 6/15/05; the Southeast Desert Modified Air Quality Management Area, including the Coachella Valley, had not timely attained this standard by the 11/15/07 “severe-17” deadline, based on 2005-2007 data; on 8/25/14, U.S. EPA proposed a clean data finding based on 2011-2013 data and a determination of attainment for the former 1-hour ozone NAAQS for the Southeast Desert nonattainment area; this rule was finalized by U.S. EPA on 4/15/15, effective 5/15/15, and included preliminary 2014 data 4 The 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS (0.075 ppm) was revised to 0.070 ppm, effective 12/28/15 with classifications and implementation goals to be finalized by 10/1/17; the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS (0.08 ppm) was revoked in the 2008 ozone NAAQS implementation rule, effective 4/6/15; there are continuing obligations under the 1997 and 2008 ozone NAAQS until they are attained 5 The annual PM2.5 standard was revised on 1/15/13, effective 3/18/13, from 15 to 12 µg/m3 6 The annual PM10 standard was revoked, effective 12/18/06; the 24-hour PM10 NAAQS attainment deadline was 12/31/2006; the Coachella Valley Attainment Re-designation Request and PM10 Maintenance Plan was postponed by U.S. EPA pending additional monitoring and analysis in the southeastern Coachella Valley
7 New 1-hour NO2 NAAQS became effective 8/2/10; attainment designations 1/20/12; annual NO2 NAAQS retained 8 The 1971 Annual and 24-hour SO2 NAAQS were revoked, effective 8/23/10; however, these 1971 standards will remain in effect until one year after U.S. EPA promulgates area designations for the 2010 SO2 1-hour standard; final area designations expected by 12/31/2020 with SSAB expected to be designated Unclassifiable/Attainment
29 Date Palm Apartments
Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Study
City of Cathedral City, CA Setting
3.2 Greenhouse Gases
Constituent gases of the Earth’s atmosphere, called atmospheric greenhouse gases (GHG), play a critical role in the Earth’s radiation amount by trapping infrared radiation emitted from the Earth’s surface, which otherwise would have escaped to space. Prominent greenhouse gases contributing to this process include carbon dioxide (CO ), methane (CH ), ozone, water vapor, nitrous oxide (N O), and 2 4 2 chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs). This phenomenon, known as the Greenhouse Effect, is responsible for maintaining a habitable climate. Anthropogenic (caused or produced by humans) emissions of these greenhouse gases in excess of natural ambient concentrations are responsible for the enhancement of the Greenhouse Effect and have led to a trend of unnatural warming of the Earth’s natural climate, known as global warming or climate change. Emissions of gases that induce global warming are attributable to human activities associated with industrial/manufacturing, agricultural, utilities, transportation, and residential land uses. Transportation is responsible for 41 percent of the State’s greenhouse gas emissions, followed by electricity generation. Emissions of CO and nitrous oxide (NO ) 2 2 are byproducts of fossil fuel combustion. Methane, a potent greenhouse gas, results from off-gassing associated with agricultural practices and landfills. Sinks of CO , where CO is stored outside of the 2 2 atmosphere, include uptake by vegetation and dissolution into the ocean. Table 6 provides a description of each of the greenhouse gases and their global warming potential.
Additional information is available: https://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/inventory/data/data.htm <Table 6, next page>
30 Date Palm Apartments
Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Study
City of Cathedral City, CA Setting
Table 6: Description of Greenhouse Gases
Greenhouse Gas Description and Physical Properties Sources Microbial processes in soil and water,
fuel combustion, and industrial
processes. In addition to agricultural
sources, some industrial processes
Nitrous oxide (N20),also known as laughing gas is a
colorless gas. It has a lifetime of 114 years. Its global warming potential is 298.
Nitrous oxide
(nylon production, nitric acid
production) also emit N20.
A natural source of CH4 is from the
decay of organic matter. Methane is
Methane (CH4) is a flammable gas and is the main extracted from geological deposits Methane component of natural gas. It has a lifetime of 12 years. (natural gas fields). Other sources are Its global warming potential is 25. from the decay of organic material in landfills, fermentation of manure, and
cattle farming.
Natural sources include decomposition
Carbon dioxide (CO2) is an odorless, colorless, natural of dead organic matter; respiration of greenhouse gas. Carbon dioxide’s global warming bacteria, plants, animals, and fungus; potential is 1. The concentration in 2005 was 379 parts evaporation from oceans; and volcanic per million (ppm), which is an increase of about 1.4 outgassing. Anthropogenic sources are Carbon dioxide
ppm per year since 1960. from burning coal, oil, natural gas, and wood.
CFCs are nontoxic, nonflammable, insoluble, and
chemically unreactive in the troposphere (the level of
air at the earth’s surface). They are gases formed
Chlorofluorocarbons were synthesized
in 1928 for use as refrigerants, aerosol
propellants, and cleaning solvents. They
destroy stratospheric ozone, therefore
their production was stopped as
required by the Montreal Protocol.
Chlorofluorocarbons synthetically by replacing all hydrogen atoms in methane or methane with chlorine and/or fluorine
atoms. Global warming potentials range from 3,800 to
8,100.
Hydrofluorocarbons
manmade chemicals used as
substitute for chlorofluorocarbons in
applications such as automobile air
conditioners and refrigerants.
are synthetic Hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) are a group of greenhouse gases containing carbon, chlorine, and at least one
hydrogen atom. Global warming potentials range from
a
Hydrofluorocarbons
Perfluorocarbons
140 to 11,700.
Perfluorocarbons (PFCs) have stable molecular
structures and only break down by ultraviolet rays Two main sources of perfluorocarbons about 60 kilometers above the Earth's surface. They are primary aluminum production and have a lifetime 10,000 to 50,000 years. They have a semiconductor manufacturing. global warming potential range of 6,200 to 9,500.
This gas is manmade and used for Sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) is an inorganic, odorless, colorless, and nontoxic, nonflammable gas. It has a
lifetime of 3,200 years. It has a high global warming
potential, 23,900.
insulation in electric power transmission
equipment, in the magnesium industry,
in semiconductor manufacturing, and as
a tracer gas for leak detection.
Sulfur
hexafluoride
Notes:
1. Sources: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 2014a and Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 2014b. https://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/ar4/wg1/en/ch2s2-10-2.html 31 Date Palm Apartments
Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Study
City of Cathedral City, CA Modeling Parameters and Assumptions
4.0 Modeling Parameters and Assumptions
4.1 Construction
Typical emission rates from construction activities were obtained from CalEEMod Version 2022.1.1.20 CalEEMod is a computer model published by the SCAQMD for estimating air pollutant emissions. The CalEEMod program uses the EMFAC2017 computer program to calculate the emission rates specific for the southwestern portion of Riverside County for construction-related employee vehicle trips and the OFFROAD2011 computer program to calculate emission rates for heavy truck operations. EMFAC2017 and OFFROAD2011 are computer programs generated by CARB that calculates composite emission rates for vehicles. Emission rates are reported by the program in grams per trip and grams per mile or grams per running hour. Using CalEEMod, the peak daily air pollutant emissions were calculated and presented below. These emissions represent the highest level of emissions for each of the construction phases in terms of air pollutant emissions.
The analysis assesses the emissions associated with the construction of the proposed project as indicated in Table 1. The project was analyzed to be operational in 2025; therefore, construction is estimated to start no sooner than the first quarter of 2024 and be completed by 2025. The phases of the construction activities which have been analyzed below are: 1) site preparation, 2) grading, 3) building, 4) paving, and 5) architectural coating. For details on construction modeling and construction equipment for each phase, please see Appendix A.
The project will be required to comply with existing SCAQMD rules for the reduction of fugitive dust emissions. SCAQMD Rule 403 establishes these procedures. Compliance with this rule is achieved through application of standard best management practices in construction and operation activities, such as application of water or chemical stabilizers to disturbed soils, managing haul road dust by application of water, covering haul vehicles, restricting vehicle speeds on unpaved roads to 15 mph, sweeping loose dirt from paved site access roadways, cessation of construction activity when winds exceed 25 mph and establishing a permanent, stabilizing ground cover on finished sites. In addition, projects that disturb 50 acres or more of soil or move 5,000 cubic yards of materials per day are required to submit a Fugitive Dust Control Plan or a Large Operation Notification Form to SCAQMD.
Based on the size of the project area (approximately 11.5 acres) and the fact that the project won’t export more than 5,000 cubic yards of material a day a Fugitive Dust Control Plan or Large Operation Notification would not be required.
SCAQMD’s Rule 403 minimum requirements require that the application of the best available dust control measures are used for all grading operations and include the application of water or other soil stabilizers in sufficient quantity to prevent the generation of visible dust plumes. Compliance with Rule 403 would require the use of water trucks during all phases where earth moving operations would occur. Compliance with Rule 403 is required.
32 Date Palm Apartments
Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Study
City of Cathedral City, CA Modeling Parameters and Assumptions
4.2 Operations
Operational or long-term emissions will occur over the life of the project. Both mobile and area sources generate operational emissions. Area source emissions arise from consumer product usage, heaters that consume natural gas, gasoline-powered landscape equipment, and architectural coatings (painting). Mobile source emissions from motor vehicles are the largest single long-term source of air pollutants from the operation of the project. Small amounts of emissions would also occur from area sources such as the consumption of natural gas for heating, hearths, from landscaping emissions, and consumer product usage. The operational emissions were estimated using the latest version of CalEEMod.
Mobile Sources
Mobile sources include emissions from the additional vehicle miles generated from the proposed project. The vehicle trips associated with the proposed project are based upon the trip generation rates given in the Traffic Scoping Agreement (Integrated Engineering Group, 2023) which uses the ITE 11th Trip Generation Manual.
The program then applies the emission factors for each trip which is provided by the EMFAC2017 model to determine the vehicular traffic pollutant emissions. The CalEEMod default trip lengths were used in this analysis. Please see CalEEMod output comments sections in Appendix A for details.
Area Sources
Area sources include emissions from consumer products, landscape equipment and architectural coatings. Landscape maintenance includes fuel combustion emissions from equipment such as lawn mowers, rototillers, shredders/grinders, blowers, trimmers, chain saws, and hedge trimmers, as well as air compressors, generators, and pumps. As specifics were not known about the landscaping equipment fleet, CalEEMod defaults were used to estimate emissions from landscaping equipment.
Per SCAQMD Rule 1113 as amended on June 3, 2011, the architectural coatings that would be applied after January 1, 2014 will be limited to an average of 50 grams per liter or less for buildings and 100 grams per liter or less for parking lot striping; however, no changes were made to the CalEEMod architectural coating default values.
Energy Usage
2022.1.1.20 CalEEMod defaults were utilized.
4.3 Localized Construction Analysis
The SCAQMD has published a “Fact Sheet for Applying CalEEMod to Localized Significance Thresholds” (South Coast Air Quality Management District 2011b). CalEEMod calculates construction emissions based on the number of equipment hours and the maximum daily disturbance activity possible for each piece of equipment. In order to compare CalEEMod reported emissions against the localized significance threshold lookup tables, the CEQA document should contain in its project design features or its mitigation measures the following parameters:
33 Date Palm Apartments
Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Study
City of Cathedral City, CA Modeling Parameters and Assumptions
1. The off-road equipment list (including type of equipment, horsepower, and hours of operation) assumed for the day of construction activity with maximum emissions.
2. The maximum number of acres disturbed on the peak day.
3. Any emission control devices added onto off-road equipment.
4. Specific dust suppression techniques used on the day of construction activity with maximum emissions.
The construction equipment showing the equipment associated with the maximum area of disturbance is shown in Table 7.
Table 7: Construction Equipment Assumptions1
Activity Equipment
Rubber Tired Dozers
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
Number Acres/8hr-day Total Acres
3 4
0.5 0.5
1.5 2.0
3.5 0.5
0.5 2.0
1.0 4.0
Site Preparation
Total Per Phase
Graders
Rubber Tired Dozers
Scrapers
1 1
2 2
0.5 0.5
1.0 0.5
Grading
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
Total Per Phase
Notes:
1. Source: CalEEMod output and South Coast AQMD, Fact Sheet for Applying CalEEMod to Localized Significance Thresholds. http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/ceqa/handbook/localized-significance-thresholds/caleemod-guidance.pdf?sfvrsn=2 As shown in Table 7, the maximum number of acres disturbed in a day would be 4.0 acres during grading.