CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA
Study Session 3:00 p.m.
Regular Meeting 5:30 p.m.
Wednesday, January 08, 2025
City Council Chambers
68-700 Avenida Lalo Guerrero
Cathedral City, CA 92234
MAYOR
Nancy Ross
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
Mayor Pro Tem
Raymond Gregory
Councilmember
Rita Lamb
Councilmember
Ernesto Gutierrez
Councilmember
Mark Carnevale
STUDY SESSION 3:00PM
Normally no action is taken on Study Session Items, however, the City Council reserves the right to give specific policy direction and take specific action as necessary.
Presentations will be limited to 10 minutes unless other provisions are made in advance.
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
AGENDA FINALIZATION
1. PUBLIC COMMENTS
This is the opportunity for members of the public to comment on any items not appearing on the regular agenda. Because of restrictions contained in California Law, the City Council may not discuss or act on any item not on the agenda but may briefly respond to statements made or ask a question for clarification. The Mayor may also request a brief response from staff to questions raised during public comment or may request a matter be agendized for a future meeting. Public Comment will be limited to three (3) minutes.
2. CLOSED SESSION
A. Conference with Labor Negotiator Pursuant to Government Code 54957.6 Labor Negotiator: Algeria Ford, Assistant City Attorney and Eugenia Torres, Human Resources Manager
Employee Organization: Police Officers Association
Recommendation: There is no Staff Recommendation
3. STUDY SESSION
A. SunLine Presentation
Recommendation: This is a presentation only, there is no formal action required.
B. Traffic Calming Policy and Guidelines: January 2025 Update Recommendation: Staff is presenting an update on the Traffic Calming Policy and Guidelines to the City Council for discussion,
comments and recommendations to review and adopt at
a later date.
C. Facilities Master Plan Update
Recommendation: This agenda item is for review and discussion only.
D. Tropical Storm Hilary FEMA Status Update
Recommendation: This agenda item is for review and discussion only.
RECESS
REGULAR MEETING - 5:30 PM
CALL TO ORDER
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
INVOCATION (MOMENT OF REFLECTION)
ROLL CALL
AGENDA FINALIZATION
1. PUBLIC COMMENTS
This is the opportunity for members of the public to comment on any items not appearing on the regular agenda. Because of restrictions contained in California Law, the City Council may not discuss or act on any item not on the agenda but may briefly respond to statements made or ask a question for clarification. The Mayor may also request a brief response from staff to questions raised during public comment or may request a matter be agendized for a future meeting. Public Comment will be limited to three (3) minutes.
2. COUNCIL REPORTS
This is an opportunity for each member of the City Council to report on any conferences they attend, local events or make any other comments they may have.
3. CONSENT AGENDA
The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and noncontroversial. They will be acted upon by the City Council at one time without discussion. Any Council Member, Staff Member, or Citizen may request removal of an item from the Consent Calendar for discussion.
A. Waive Full Reading of Ordinances on Agenda
Recommendation: Waive Full Reading of Ordinances on Agenda B. Approval of December 10, 2024 Special City Council Meeting Minutes and December 11, 2024 Study Session and Regular City Council Meeting Minutes
Recommendation: Approve the December 10, 2024 Special City Council Meeting Minutes and December 11, 2024 Study Session
and Regular City Council Meeting Minutes.
C. Second Reading of an Ordinance to Amend Zoning Code to Add Driveway Width Standard, Allow a Greater Percentage of Front Yard to Be Improved as a Driveway, Introduce Civil Fines for Parking Violations, and Prohibit Parking in Front of a Mailbox.
Recommendation: To waive reading beyond the title; provide second reading by title only; and adopt an ordinance to amend Title 9 and Title 12 of the Cathedral City Municipal Code by amending Chapters 9.12, 9.14, 12.12, and 12.32. The proposed
changes will revise sections relating to driveway width and guidelines for the percentage of the front yard that can be improved as a driveway, introduce civil fines for parking violations, and amend areas designated as no parking
areas to include restrictions for parking in front of a mailbox.
D. CFD 2006-1, IA #22 Authorizing the Levy of a Special Tax (2nd Reading Recommendation: Conduct Second Reading and adopt the Ordinance authorizing the levy of a special tax within Improvement Area No. 22 of the City of Cathedral City Community
Facilities District No. 2006-1 (Law Enforcement, Fire,
Paramedic, Park and General Maintenance Services).
E. Notice of Completion for the Tropical Storm Hilary - Soil Removal for Ofelia Bringas Memorial Bridge Grade Control Structure and Date Palm Drive Channel Lining Project
Recommendation: To accept and approve the Tropical Storm Hilary - Soil Removal for Ofelia Bringas Memorial Bridge Grade
Control Structure (City Project No. M00023) and Date
Palm Drive Bridge Channel Lining (City Project No.
M00025) as complete; authorize the City Manager to
execute and file a notice of completion with the Riverside County Recorder’s Office; and authorize the release of
retention funds to Contera Construction Corporation upon expiration of the notice of completion.
4. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. General Plan Amendment 23-002, Change of Zone 23-001 and Design Review 23-002 for Development of a 204-unit Apartment Community.
Recommendation: That the City Council take the following actions based on the Planning Commission’s adoption of Resolution PC
2024-05, recommending approval of the Project:
1. Adopt the mitigated negative declaration and mitigation monitoring and reporting plan prepared for the project
based on the findings contained in the staff report; and
2. Adopt a resolution approving General Plan Amendment
23-002 to amend the General Plan land use designation
from general commercial to medium high density
residential (11-20 dwelling units per acre), based on the findings and conclusions contained in the resolution and staff report; and
3. Adopt an ordinance approving Change of Zone 23-001
amending the Zoning Map to change the zone district from Planned Community Commercial to Multiple-family
Residential (R3), based on the findings and conclusions contained in the ordinance and staff report; and
4. Approve Design Review 23-002 to construct a 204-unit apartment project, based on the findings and conclusions contained in the staff report and subject to the attached conditions of approval.
5. LEGISLATIVE ACTIONS
A. Approval of Grant Expenditure SLESA FY 2021/2022 for FARO 3D Scene Scanner
Recommendation: Approve the expenditure plan appropriating Supplemental Law Enforcement Services Account (SLESA) for FY
2021-2022 allocation for a FARO Focus 3D scene
scanner and Dell computer workstation.
6. DISCUSSION ON FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
This is an opportunity for members of the City Council to request that, and for the City Council to discuss whether, one or more items should be added to the agenda of a future regular or special City Council meeting. To comply with the Brown Act, discussion should be limited to whether to add the item(s), and direction given to the City Manager regarding scheduling and prioritization of the item(s).
7. CLOSED SESSION
ADJOURNMENT
NOTES TO THE PUBLIC
The City of Cathedral City complies with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. If you require special assistance to participate in this meeting, please call the City Clerk’s Office at (760) 770-0322 at least 48 hours prior to the meeting.
If you desire to address the City Council during the meeting, please complete a Request to Speak Form available at the entrance and present it to the City Clerk. Speakers will be called upon at the appropriate time.
Written Comments will be accepted until 2:00 p.m. on the day of the meeting. Written comments may be submitted via email, letter, or other forms of written communication. To email comments please email to [email protected].
Hard copies of written comments and any other document will be provided to the City Council and made available for the general public to review. All written comments received by the submission deadline will be made part of the official record. The meeting minutes will include: The name of the individual submitting the comment and a brief statement summarizing the content of the comment.
Submitted Written Comments will not be read into the record during the meeting.
Staff Report
City Council
Item No. 2.A
Meeting Date: December 11, 2024
From: Algeria Ford, Assistant City Attorney
Title: Conference with Labor Negotiator Pursuant to Government Code 54957.6
Labor Negotiator: Algeria Ford, Assistant City Attorney and Eugenia Torres, Human Resources Manager
Employee Organization: Police Officers Association
Staff Report
City Council
Item No. 3.A
Meeting Date: January 8, 2025
From: Tracey Hermosillo, City Clerk
Title: SunLine Presentation
RECOMMENDATION:
This is a presentation only, there is no formal action required.
BACKGROUND:
SunLine Transit Agency provides public transportation services and alternative fuel solutions to meet mobility needs of the Coachella Valley.
DISCUSSION:
SunLine’s CEO, Mona Babauta, will provide a presentation and discuss the potential development of a transit hub at B Street and Buddy Rogers, similar to the hub constructed in Coachella.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no fiscal impact with this item.
FIVE-YEAR STRATEGIC PLAN:
Not applicable
ATTACHMENTS:
None
Staff Report
City Council
Item No. 3.B
Meeting Date: January 8, 2025
From: John A. Corella, Director of Public Works
Title: Traffic Calming Policy and Guidelines: January 2025 Update
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff is presenting an update on the Traffic Calming Policy and Guidelines to the City Council for discussion, comments and recommendations to review and adopt at a later date.
BACKGROUND:
Nationwide, vehicles speeding on streets has been a challenge since the invention of the automobile. As urban areas expanded, so did roadways and vehicular traffic. As vehicles became more powerful, speeds increased accordingly. With respect to the aforementioned, residential neighborhood streets have also been affected by speeding vehicles, despite the efforts of the residents and local law enforcement over the years.
The City of Cathedral City is not immune to the challenges of vehicles speeding in residential neighborhoods. The city Public Works (Engineering and Public Works Maintenance Divisions) and Police Department are working together to address our resident’s concerns for the subsequent implementation of the appropriate traffic calming measures to reduce speeding on our streets.
On Wednesday, April 13, 2023, the City Council unanimously approved a 5-Year Strategic Plan to provide a longer-term perspective for service delivery and budgeting as well as addressing current needs and priorities in the city. One of the priorities in the strategic plan is to develop a traffic calming plan with strategies for addressing location specific speeding issues.
The city created the Traffic Calming Committee, composed of city staff from various Departments/Divisions, including Public Works Maintenance, Fire, Police, Fleet Maintenance, and Engineering.
The committee implemented a “Temporary Traffic Control Measures Process", where each step initiates an increased effort in the enforcement of the regulatory speed limit on residential streets.
As approved through the budget process, the committee procured temporary equipment including portable speed humps, flashing regulatory speed signs, speed feedback signs, and an enclosed storage trailer.
The temporary traffic calming devices and supporting equipment were mobilized and installed at the first location in July 2024. Since then, five residential streets have been evaluated in response to residents' complaints regarding speeding in their neighborhoods. Memorandums outlining the results for each location are attached to this report.
Based on the evaluation and results from the initial temporary traffic calming efforts, as well as additional research, the Engineering Division has developed the Traffic Calming Policy and Guidelines. This policy outlines a comprehensive set of measures designed to enhance neighborhood safety and quality of life through a variety of roadway improvement strategies.
DISCUSSION:
Traffic calming is the process of minimizing the negative impacts associated with neighborhood vehicular traffic interacting with residents, pedestrians, bicyclists and school children. When implemented, traffic calming measures can reduce neighborhood speeding, cut-through traffic, and reckless driver behavior on city streets.
The purpose of traffic calming measures falls into two fundamental categories:
• Devices that reduce speed
• Devices that reduce volume
The process to successfully provide traffic calming improvements is separated into two parts, each consisting of specific components and steps that should be considered during the development of a street/neighborhood traffic management plan.
The two parts in this process are:
1. PART A: Investigation - Temporary Traffic Control Measures
2. PART B: Actions - Permanent Traffic Control Measures.
PART A, Investigation - “Temporary Traffic Control Measures” is the first part of the process and implementation of traffic calming measures. This part describes how the traffic calming process is initiated and how requests are handled and considered for treatment.
The parameters for the implementation of traffic calming devices in residential areas are as follows:
• Parameter 1: The measured 85th percentile traffic speed shall be equal to or greater than 35 mph, and/or;
• Parameter 2: 70% of the measured speeds shall be more than 25 mph (speed limit).
At least one of the above-mentioned parameters needs to be met in order to proceed to the next step in the temporary traffic control measures process. If none of the parameters are met, no additional step is required. If parameters are met for additional traffic control measures, available options shall be recommended for implementation in the “Permanent Traffic Calming Measures” part of the process.
PART B, Actions – “Permanent Traffic Control Measures” is the second part of the process for implementing traffic calming measures, which includes three distinct components: one for city actions, another for localized traffic calming measures, and a third for the neighborhood traffic control plan.
Within these components, staff resources and funding need to be identified to start the traffic calming plan; all relevant participants, residents and committees and the study area need to be determined; surveys and/or petitions assessing neighborhood support may be required; and needed funding is identified prior to the construction of the project.
Traffic Calming Measures Available Options
The design of traffic calming measures can be organized into four categories to assist in understanding the available options.
• Option 1 – Awareness Measures
• Option 2 – Vertical Deflection Measures
• Option 3 – Horizontal Deflection Measures
• Option 4 – Diversion Measures
The available options, placement and design considerations of traffic calming measures are explained in detail in the attached Traffic Calming Policy and Guidelines document.
The challenge of traffic calming is selecting the appropriate measures and locations to reach a balance between the need to provide an efficient transportation network and maintaining a livable and safe environment for bicyclists, pedestrians, and other street or street-adjacent users. Traffic calming also involves trade-offs such as travel time impacts, emergency response times, noise and street diversion.
Staff is presenting an update on the Traffic Calming Policy and Guidelines to the City Council for discussion, comments and recommendations to review and adopt at a later date.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no fiscal impact associated with this discussion item.
FIVE-YEAR STRATEGIC PLAN:
City Council Goal B: Community Investment
Cathedral City roads, gateways, public spaces, and other city infrastructure are well planned, designed, constructed, and maintained.
Action B-10
Develop a traffic calming plan with strategies for addressing location specific speeding issues.
ATTACHMENTS:
1 – Traffic Calming Guidelines
2 – Temporary Traffic Measures - Memorandums
Traffic Calming Policy and Guidelines
Public Works Department
Engineering Division
City of Cathedral City
68 - 700 Avenida Lalo Guerrero
Cathedral City, CA 92234
Traffic Calming Policy and Guidelines
Page i
Contents
1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 1
1.1 Objective .................................................................................................................... 1
1.2 Traffic Calming ............................................................................................................ 1
1.3 Existing and Future Concerns ..................................................................................... 1
1.4 Existing Procedure – Temporary Traffic Calming......................................................... 2 2 Goals, Policy, Objectives, and Guidelines ........................................................................... 3
2.1 Goals .......................................................................................................................... 3
2.2 Policy .......................................................................................................................... 3
2.2.1 Traffic Calming Policy ............................................................................................. 3
2.3 Objectives ................................................................................................................... 4
2.4 Guidelines .................................................................................................................. 4 3 Project Process and Implementation ................................................................................... 6
3.1 PART A: Investigation - Temporary Traffic Control Measures ...................................... 6
3.1.1 Temporary Traffic Calming Procedure ..................................................................... 6
3.2 PART B: Actions - Permanent Traffic Control Measures .............................................. 9
3.2.1 City Actions ............................................................................................................. 9
3.2.2 Localized Traffic Calming Control Measures ..........................................................10
3.2.3 Neighborhood Traffic Calming Control Plan ........................................................... 11 4 Design Guidance ...............................................................................................................18
4.1 Purpose .....................................................................................................................18
4.2 Design .......................................................................................................................18
4.2.1 Available Options ...................................................................................................18
4.2.2 Available Options by Purpose ................................................................................19
4.2.3 Placement Considerations .....................................................................................21
4.2.4 Design Considerations ...........................................................................................21
4.3 Traffic Calming Trade-Offs .........................................................................................21
4.3.1 Travel Time Impacts: ..............................................................................................22
4.3.2 Emergency Response Times: ................................................................................22
4.3.3 Noise: ....................................................................................................................22
4.3.4 Street Diversion: ....................................................................................................22
5. Speed Reduction Measures ...............................................................................................23
5.1 Awareness Measures ................................................................................................23
5.2 Vertical Deflection Measures .....................................................................................34 Traffic Calming Policy and Guidelines
Page ii
5.3 Horizontal Deflection Measures .................................................................................38
6. Volume Reduction Measures .............................................................................................49
6.1 Awareness Measures ................................................................................................49
6.2 Diversionary Measures ..............................................................................................51 References List:
1. California Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD), 2014 Edition, California Department of Transportation.
2. City of San Diego Traffic Calming Guidelines, City of San Diego, California.
3. Neighborhood Traffic Calming Manual, Updated 2023, City of Palm Springs, California.
4. Traffic Calming ePrimer, Federal Highway Administration website, U.S. Department of Transportation.
5. Traffic Calming Guide, A Compendium of Strategies, California Department of Transportation.
6. Traffic Calming Measures, Resources, Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) website.
7. Traffic Calming Policy and Resolution, City of Berkeley, California
8. 2040 General Plan and Active Transportation Plan, City Cathedral of Cathedral City.
9. Cathedral City Active Transportation Plan, February 2023, City Cathedral of Cathedral City Traffic Calming Policy and Guidelines
1 Introduction
1.1 Objective
The City of Cathedral City Traffic Calming Guidelines are a comprehensive set of measures intended to improve neighborhood safety and quality of life through the use of various roadway improvement strategies. The contents of this guideline document are not presented as firm requirements; rather, they provide a tool for city staff, residents, and other collaborative teams to use when developing effective traffic calming plans.
1.2 Traffic Calming
Traffic calming is the process of minimizing the negative impacts associated with neighborhood traffic on residents, pedestrians, bicyclists and school children. When implemented, traffic calming measures can reduce neighborhood speeding, cut-through traffic, and reckless driver behavior on city streets.
The purpose of traffic calming measures falls into two fundamental categories:
Devices that reduce “Speed”
Devices that reduce “Volume”
While roadways ensure both vehicle and pedestrian connectivity, excessive traffic or speeding can cause adverse neighborhood impacts resulting from their original design and placement. To avoid these negative impacts, city streets can be retrofitted to encourage safer driver behavior.
The guidelines and traffic calming measures presented in this document are intended to be implemented on residential streets, many of these measures can be successfully applied to major and collector roadways as well.
1.3 Existing and Future Concerns
These guidelines are part of the City's Traffic Calming strategy and is intended to help address existing and future neighborhood concerns and to facilitate the coordination between City staff and residents so that they may work together to develop traffic calming solutions.
Existing concerns may involve both speeding and cut-through traffic through existing neighborhoods. These concerns are addressed in this document by providing resources of available traffic calming measures along with information on selecting the appropriate traffic calming device to ensure its successful physical placement in the residential environment.
The Traffic Calming Guidelines have also been developed as a planning tool for City staff and developers concerned with avoiding traffic challenges in future neighborhoods.
Traffic Calming Policy and Guidelines
1.4 Existing Procedure – Temporary Traffic Calming
Currently, traffic calming in the City of Cathedral City is handled by city staff who receive individual requests from residents for traffic solutions in their neighborhoods. These requests are directed to the Engineering Division to evaluate and coordinate. Once a request is received, temporary traffic calming measures are scheduled for that road segment with the assistance of the Public Works Maintenance Division. The temporary traffic calming measures are considered the preliminary evaluation to determine if permanent traffic measures are recommended (PART A) to move forward into the implementation phase (PART B). In addition, funding must be identified for a project to proceed.
Traffic Calming Policy and Guidelines
2 Goals, Policy, Objectives, and Guidelines
The primary purpose of traffic calming is to support the livability and vitality of residential and commercial areas through improvements in non-motorist safety, mobility, and comfort. These objectives are typically achieved by reducing vehicle speeds or volumes on a single street or a street network.
2.1 Goals
Many of the goals and policies relating to traffic calming are identified in the Circulation and Mobility Element of the City’s General Plan (2021). The two main goals in the City’s General Plan are:
Goal 1: An intra- and inter-city transportation system that provides for the safe, efficient, diverse and cost-effective movement of people and goods, and enhances commerce and the overall economic well-being of the entire community. Goal 2: A City-wide and neighborhood-specific transportation system that is responsive to, and which implements the new urbanism principles of community design, through land use and transportation planning.
2.2 Policy
The City of Cathedral City has several goals, policies and objectives regarding traffic calming which are referenced but not explicitly outlined in the Circulation and Mobility Element of the City’s General Plan, the City’s Active Transportation Plan, and the 5-Year Strategic Plan.
Beyond the recognition of safe neighborhoods and walkable streets contained in the General Plan goals, other specific policies identify and guide the effort to design communities with pedestrians, safety and comfort in mind. This document introduces the traffic calming policy supporting the General Plan goals.
2.2.1 Traffic Calming Policy
Install traffic calming measures to increase safety and enhance the livability of communities. Use traffic calming techniques in appropriate locations to reduce vehicle speeds or discourage shortcutting traffic.
Choose traffic calming devices to best fit the situation for which it is intended.
Traffic Calming Policy and Guidelines
Place traffic calming devices so that the full benefit of calming will be realized with little or no negative effect upon the overall safety or quality of the roadway. Design traffic calming devices appropriately, including consideration for accessibility, drainage, underground utilities, adequate visibility, the needs of emergency, sanitation, and transit vehicles, and landscaping.
Weigh the undesired effects of traffic calming devices (increased travel times, emergency response times, noise, and traffic diversion) against their prescribed benefits.
2.3 Objectives
The objectives of traffic calming are:
Reduce traffic speeds on residential streets with a demonstrated problem to levels consistent with other non-impacted local streets in the City. Reduce, eliminate or discourage demonstrated non-local “cut-through” traffic on local residential streets and focus such traffic on the arterial roadway system. Limit the shifting of traffic intrusion and speeding problems from one residential street or neighborhood to another.
Ensure citizen participation throughout the process, obtaining the input of affected residents, business owners and non-resident property owners. Minimize impacts on emergency vehicle response times due to the use of neighborhood traffic control measures.
2.4 Guidelines
The City of Cathedral City adopted several guidelines for street design including the County of Riverside County Road Standards (Ordinance No 461, 2023), the California Department of Transportation Standard Plans and Specifications (2023), Caltrans Traffic Calming Guide, and the California Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (2014).
These guidelines help facilitate the physical implementation of various traffic calming devices, and include general design criteria regarding pedestrian safety such as:
Signing, striping and pavement markings for streets experiencing excessive vehicle speeds.
Marked crosswalks that can be enhanced at some locations with traffic signals, pedestrian signals when warranted, traffic-calming treatments, or other substantial crossing Traffic Calming Policy and Guidelines
improvements presented in these guidelines, and should not be used under the following conditions:
a) Where the 85% percentile speed exceeds 40 mph.
b) On a roadway with four or more lanes without additional traffic calming treatments such as islands, lighted crosswalks, etc.
c) On a roadway with poor illumination, poor sight distance, or very low pedestrian volumes.
Residential street crossings combined with traffic calming measures designed to maintain low vehicle speeds such as raised crosswalks, and gateway narrowing. Curb extensions at the crosswalk enhancing pedestrian crossing visibility and reduce crossing distance.
On streets that experience excessive vehicle speeds, pedestrian crossings should be enhanced with traffic calming measures, such as raised crosswalks or curb extensions.
Traffic Calming Policy and Guidelines
3 Project Process and Implementation
This section describes a process that can be used to successfully provide traffic calming improvements. This section can be used by City staff and residents seeking to find solutions to neighborhood traffic calming issues.
The process is separated into two (2) parts, each consisting of specific components and steps that should be considered during the development of a street/neighborhood traffic management plan.
The two parts in this process are:
1. PART A: Investigation - Temporary Traffic Control Measures
2. PART B: Actions - Permanent Traffic Control Measures.
3.1 PART A: Investigation - Temporary Traffic Control Measures This is the first part of the process and implementation of traffic calming measures. This part describes how the traffic calming process is initiated and how requests are handled and considered for treatment.
One of the priorities in the 5-Year Strategic Plan was developing a traffic calming plan with strategies to address location-specific speeding issues. As a response to the priority, the city created the Traffic Calming Committee, composed of city Staff from various Departments/Divisions, including Public Works Maintenance, Fire, Police, Fleet Maintenance, and Engineering. The Traffic Calming Committee was responsible for procuring temporary traffic calming devices and developing a temporary traffic calming procedure.
3.1.1 Temporary Traffic Calming Procedure
The temporary traffic calming procedure include the following steps.
Step 1: Identify Candidate Streets/Neighborhoods
The process is started when a residents’ request is submitted to the Engineering Division to investigate speeding, cut-through traffic or other traffic related safety issues within their neighborhood.
The request should be detailed for staff to understand the traffic-related issues within the neighborhood. The request should identify the location (roadway segment) of the problem, whether the problem is excessive speed and/or excessive traffic volume, and include the initiating party's home address, e-mail address, and telephone number.
Traffic Calming Policy and Guidelines
Additionally, citizens’ requests may filter through the Police Department, Council Office, or local Community Groups.
Staff will review the request and may need to conduct minor data collection.
This initial investigation allows staff to determine the type and magnitude of the problem and best course of action. The initial investigation will determine if temporary traffic calming measures are necessary to address the resident’s concern related to traffic related safety issues within their neighborhood or it could also lead to other solutions, for example, concerns may be addressed through maintenance (trees blocking a stop sign), or targeted police enforcement.
The parameters for the implementation of traffic calming devices in residential areas are as follows:
Parameter 1: The measured 85th percentile traffic speed shall be equal to or greater than 35 mph, and or,
Parameter 2: 70% of the measured speeds shall be in excess of 25 mph.
Step 2 – Speed Radar Survey
Once the location is identified, Public Works staff will install a speed radar device to measure traffic speeds 24/7 for a minimum of a week. The speed radar is then returned to the Engineering Division to determine whether the parameters for implementing traffic calming devices are met.
If traffic speeds do not meet the parameter thresholds, the study is completed, and the city takes no further action.
If traffic speeds meet the parameter thresholds, the city will proceed to step 3 of the temporary traffic calming policy.
Step 3: Speed Feedback Signs
Staff from Public Works Maintenance Division will then install speed feedback signs (one sign installed in each direction of travel) to measure/collect data and display traffic speeds 24/7 for a minimum of a week.
The data from the speed feedback signs is then analyzed by the Engineering Division to determine whether the parameters for implementing traffic calming devices are met. If traffic speeds do not meet the parameters, the study is completed, and the traffic calming committee will then recommend permanent traffic calming measures to the City Engineer. If traffic speeds meet the parameter, the city will proceed to step 4 of the temporary traffic calming policy.
Traffic Calming Policy and Guidelines
Step 4: Speed Feedback Signs and Police Traffic Enforcement Speed feedback signs (one sign installed in each direction of travel) will remain installed to measure and display traffic speeds 24/7. The police department is also notified to patrol and enforce the area for a minimum of two weeks.
The data from the speed feedback signs is then analyzed to determine whether the parameters for implementing traffic calming devices are met. Additionally, the number of speeding tickets, if any, issued by the Police Department will be considered in the analysis. If traffic speeds do not meet the parameters, the study is completed, and the traffic calming committee will then recommend permanent traffic calming measures to the City Engineer. If traffic speeds do meet the parameters, the speed feedback signs should be returned to the public works yard, and the city will proceed to step 5 of the temporary traffic calming policy.
Step 5: Speed Cushions/Humps
Prior to installing the temporary speed cushions, Engineering staff must analyze the street geometry to determine the optimum location for the traffic calming device. Once a location is identified, Public Works Maintenance Division staff will install speed cushions and the respective signage to inform oncoming traffic. The speed radar will also be installed to measure traffic speeds 24/7 for a minimum of two weeks. The data from the speed radar is then analyzed to determine if the parameters for implementing traffic calming devices are met. The traffic calming committee will then recommend permanent traffic calming measures to the City Engineer.
Step 6: Memorandum
After reviewing the recommendations from the Traffic Calming Committee, the City Engineer will prepare a technical memorandum outlining the proposed traffic calming measures.
The memorandum will be submitted to the Public Works Director for approval of the traffic calming measures recommended by the City Engineer and for funding allocation, if necessary.
If the memorandum concludes that no traffic control measures are required, the study is complete, and no further actions will be required.
If the memorandum concludes that the issue warrants action but that permanently constructed traffic calming devices are not the most cost-effective solution, city actions may be recommended. These actions may include police enforcement, education, maintenance, monitoring, traffic operations, and other measures. The Public Works Director will then discuss these actions with the relevant departments and proceed with Part B of the process, which includes allocating available funds and approving the necessary actions to implement the permanent traffic control measures.
Traffic Calming Policy and Guidelines
If the memorandum concludes that the issue warrants action and that the installation of permanent traffic calming devices is the appropriate solution, the Public Works Director will proceed with Part B of the process, which may include using available budgeted funds and/or proceeding to secure approval of the funds necessary to implement the permanent traffic control measures.
3.2 PART B: Actions - Permanent Traffic Control Measures This is the second part of the process for implementing traffic calming measures, which includes three distinct components: one for city actions, another for localized traffic calming measures, and a third for the neighborhood traffic control plan.
The Director of Public Works will approve the technical memorandum that outlines the process for the implementation of permanent traffic calming measures.
3.2.1 City Actions
City actions generally fall into either enforcement or traffic operations and maintenance, with no neighborhood actions required.
3.2.1.1 Enforcement
Staff may decide the best solution is to increase enforcement in the affected area by employing one of the following:
Temporary radar speed trailers
Increased police presence (targeted speed enforcement) Radar trailers can be an alternative to traffic calming. Increased police enforcement is dependent on police availability. These methods can be effective in reducing speed in the short-term, but unless increased police enforcement is continued, driver behavior will often revert to preenforcement levels.
3.2.1.2 Traffic Operation and Maintenance Traffic Calming Measures Traffic operations and maintenance can be altered by the City to reduce neighborhood impacts.
The following are examples of traffic operations and maintenance changes that City staff may choose to implement. Examples of these improvements are:
Centerline lane striping
Centerline Dots
Trimming of vegetation to improve sight distance
Signal timing changes on arterials or collectors
Vehicle prohibitions implemented via signage
Signage changes
Turning movement restrictions
Traffic Calming Policy and Guidelines
3.2.1.3 Funding
These measures are lower-cost and easier to implement. However, resources from the City’s operations and maintenance departments will be required, and staff should ensure that these resources are available.
Staff will need to assess the effects of the action to ensure it benefits the neighborhood. Additions or removals will be at the discretion of staff and should be made without neighborhood input.
The Director of Public Works will identify the available funding sources for the traffic operations and maintenance traffic calming measures.
The following funding sources, if available, may be used to implement these city actions:
Public Works operations and maintenance budget.
Capital improvements funds if a project is planned or identified in the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for the street segment under analysis, and/or if funding for traffic calming measures is programmed in the CIP. Assessment Districts funds
Special contributions from district funds
3.2.2 Localized Traffic Calming Control Measures
3.2.2.1 Localized Traffic Calming Issue
A localized issue pertains to a relatively small area (a street or set of streets) where implementation of traffic calming treatment would not cause spillover effects to adjacent streets.
An example of this could be a residential street connecting two arterials with no other streets in the neighborhood providing through access between the two arterials. If a traffic calming treatment intended to reduce travel time through the neighborhood were introduced on the cutthrough route, then the cut-through traffic would be redirected to the arterials.
Another example of a localized issue could be a speed related issue on a collector leading from a subdivision to an arterial. Introducing a traffic calming treatment intended to reduce speed on the collector would not cause spillover onto adjacent residential streets.
If an issue is determined by staff to be localized, then it follows the localized traffic calming process as described below.
3.2.2.2 Localized Traffic Calming Control Measures Process Issues that are determined to be localized can follow a more streamlined process for treatment.
The following describes the localized traffic calming process. a) City staff begins the localized process by reviewing information about the issue and identifying a treatment. The proposed treatment should be consistent with the traffic calming guidelines and any additional City guidelines. If possible, proposed treatments found to be effective for similar issues should be used as guides.
Traffic Calming Policy and Guidelines
b) Staff consults with affected agencies (i.e., fire department, police department, transit agencies, school districts, environmental services, and street division) to gather their input on the proposed treatment. Fire department approval must be received before continuing the process. If the fire department does not approve of the treatment as proposed by staff or any alternatives, then the requestors are informed that the plan to implement a traffic calming treatment on their street(s) was unsuccessful.
c) The City next circulates a petition to residents of the affected street or set of streets where treatment is desired.
d) Residents need to complete and return the petition with 75% or more of the responses in support of the proposed treatment. If the plan fails to receive approval of at least 75%, then it is not continued. The requestor will be informed that the plan to implement the proposed traffic calming treatment on their street(s) was unsuccessful. e) After successful support from residents, the proposed plan will be presented to the Traffic Calming Committee. Input from Traffic Calming Committee will be considered advisory with the City Council having the ultimate decision.
f) Staff will identify the funding. Special contributions might be available through resident’s organizations for treatment in certain areas. The following funding sources, if available, may be used to implement these localized traffic calming measures:
Public Works operations and maintenance budget.
Capital improvements funds if a project is planned or identified in the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for the street segment under analysis, and/or if funding for traffic calming measures is programmed in the CIP. Assessment Districts funds
Special contributions from district funds
g) Once the plan has been completed and funding is available, the City Council may be required to approve a contract or task order for construction of the treatment companies providing services to install the traffic calming measures selected. h) Before construction, staff will notify the public and affected agencies regarding the implementation of a traffic calming device. Notification helps ensure that motorists and other road users, including fire and emergency response vehicles, are familiar with the device and that they can continue to use the roadway in a safe manner. i) The traffic calming device or devices will be installed.
3.2.3 Neighborhood Traffic Calming Control Plan
3.2.3.1 Neighborhood Traffic Calming Issue
A traffic calming issue, not previously determined to be localized, is treated as a neighborhood traffic calming issue.
Traffic Calming Policy and Guidelines
An example of a neighborhood traffic calming issue is when a traffic calming treatment on one street, if implemented, would simply result in moving the challenge to an adjacent street or to several adjacent streets or neighborhoods. Once the issue is determined to be of a neighborhood scale, the City Manager is notified. Funding and staff resources are assessed to establish viability of project.
After the City Manager notification, staff begins to collect input from the community through community outreach. A Community Planning Group including the Traffic Calming Committee, the City Engineer, and, if necessary, an on-call traffic engineering consultant will be formed. The community planning group will help determine if the challenge is recent, on-going, broad, or narrow.
Once the issue is determined to be a neighborhood traffic calming issue and community planning group input has been collected, the study area will be defined. The study area should include streets that are materially affected by the proposed actions and should generally be bounded by major features (arterials, streets, rivers, canyons, etc.). Traffic calming treatments may be applied to multiple streets within the study area. Once the study area is defined, the treatment may be added to the Capital Improvement Plan list of projects.
3.2.3.2 Neighborhood Traffic Calming Control Plan Process The neighborhood traffic calming control plan process include the following steps.
3.2.3.2.1 Plan Development
Plan development starts once adequate staff resources and project funding are identified.
The plan development component begins after staff has defined the study area. This section describes how the neighborhood task force, staff, and other affected agencies work together to develop a plan to treat traffic related issues.
A - Selection of the Neighborhood Area
Staff notifies the residents on the affected area about the selection of their neighborhood area to participate in the traffic calming plan.
B – Community Outreach
Following the notice, a community outreach meeting with residents in the affected area will be held. The meeting is intended for staff to provide an overview of the process to develop, approve, and implement a neighborhood traffic management plan.
At this meeting, residents will have the opportunity to volunteer for the task force. Members of the task force should largely be residents or business owners from the study area. The task force should include a representative from the Community Planning Group. The task force will meet with City staff to review and develop a plan for their neighborhood. Although all residents have the opportunity to provide input and receive updates as the plan develops, the task force is more actively involved, committing the time and effort necessary to develop a comprehensive plan.
Residents not selected for the task force are welcome to attend all meetings, and time will be allocated on the agenda for public comments/questions.
Traffic Calming Policy and Guidelines
C – Task Force to Clarify Goals/Purpose
Once the task force is formed, they will meet with staff to clarify their goals and purpose. The meeting will accomplish the following:
Neighborhood Traffic Management Tutorial – Staff presents an overview of the program and devices. This is intended to be for informational purposes only and not a prescription of what should be implemented.
Review traffic-related issues – Discuss the type of issue(s), location(s), and time of occurrences.
Refine study area (if necessary) – Staff will refine the study area based on street(s) affected by the traffic-related issues or that may potentially be affected by development of a neighborhood traffic management plan.
Review traffic data – Review the initial data collected and determine if additional data collection is necessary.
Define desired outcomes – Clearly defined outcomes need to be formed as a benchmark for results.
D – Staff to Collect Additional Data
If additional data collection is necessary, then staff will collect traffic data based on the study area as previously defined.
E –Data Review
City staff and the task force will schedule a meeting(s) to review traffic data within the study area and formulate ideas to address problems. Data regarding the traffic related concerns and traffic data would be compared to the design guidelines (see Section 4) to determine which devices may be most appropriate. At this point in the process, staff can also begin to contact affected agencies (Fire Department, Police Department, EMS, Transit Agencies, School Districts, Environmental Services, Public Works Maintenance Division) to better understand their needs and concerns.
F – Plan Development
The main purpose for the task force is to identify issues and serve as liaison to the Community Planning Group and the residents, and to provide feedback to staff proposals.
The initial plan development may consider the following speed reduction devices to treat the traffic related concerns (see Section 4):
Vertical Devices – Speed cushions, speed humps, speed tables, etc. Horizontal Devices – Traffic circles, roundabouts, etc. Signing and Marking Devices – Lane striping, botts dots, speed legends, etc. Narrowing Devices – Bulbouts, chokers, center island narrowings, etc.
Traffic Calming Policy and Guidelines
Because volume reduction measures (i.e. partial closures or forced turn islands) intentionally divert traffic to another street, new issues can occur as a result. For this reason, volume reduction devices are not proposed until all other options have been shown to be ineffective at reducing the traffic-related impacts.
G – Affected Agency Review
Once staff and the task force have developed a plan that they believe appropriately addresses the traffic-related issues, City staff will seek additional feedback from other agencies that may be potentially affected by the plan. The intent of this process is to identify concerns and potential modifications to the plan. The following agencies will likely be involved in reviewing most plans:
City of Cathedral City Fire Department and EMS
City of Cathedral City Police Department
Transit Agencies (Sunline)
Palm Springs Unified School District
Environmental Services (Burrtec)
Public Works Maintenance Division
Staff will share the input from these agencies with the task force, and the task force will revise the plan accordingly.
H – Notify Residents
A neighborhood meeting will be arranged by the Community Planning Group to present the proposed plan to the neighborhood at-large to gather input prior to the approval process.
I – Planning Group Meeting
At this meeting the task force will present a map of the proposed plan and describe the types and locations of devices proposed.
At this time, residents can also recommend what, if any, aesthetic improvements are desired.
Changes to the proposed plan can be made as necessary. This Planning Group meeting is intended for informational purposes.
Residents are informed of the approval process and ballots/petitions they will receive once the proposed plan is refined.
3.2.3.2.2 Plan Support
The plan support component assesses the amount of neighborhood support for the proposed plan.
A – Neighborhood Education
Prior to surveys being distributed, residents, business owners, and property owners are informed regarding the pending plan details and of the approval process.
Traffic Calming Policy and Guidelines
This could be carried out through public notices, mailers, newspaper and also through neighborhood association newsletters.
B – Survey Distribution to Immediate Adjacent Residents (Approval Rate) Staff and the Task Force distribute surveys to neighborhood residents who are immediately adjacent to the proposed device(s). The immediately adjacent addresses are determined by location. For devices placed at an intersection, responses should come from addresses within 150 feet in each direction of the device. For devices placed within a residential block, responses should come from address only within that block. A minimum approval rate of 75 percent must be met from the immediate adjacent resident survey. If the minimum approval rate is not met, the task force has one opportunity to revise the plan if desired.
C – Survey Distribution to Entire Area (Support Rate)
Once the 75% approval rate has been met by the adjacent residents, the survey will be distributed to the entire study area. A minimum response rate and support rate must be met from individuals in the study area before the plan moves forward. For implementation of speed reduction devices, a minimum of 33 percent of all surveys must be returned with a simple majority of those responses in favor of the plan (50% + 1). For example, if 100 surveys are mailed out, at least 33 must be returned with 17 or more of those in favor of the proposed plan. If the plan includes volume reduction measures, a minimum of 50 percent of ballots must be returned with 67 percent or more of those responses in favor.
Apartments present a unique situation because residents may be less likely to respond. For this reason, surveys from apartment units are not counted toward the minimum response rate but will be counted in favor or against the proposed plan.
D – General Public Responses
Responses from the general public (phone, website, e-mails) will be recorded separately. Those responses will be considered for information purposes only, with no thresholds of approval required.
E – Survey Results Discussion
City staff will count all received ballots and determine whether the minimum response rate and support rate are satisfied. If the minimum number of ballots is not received, neighborhood residents could be reminded to submit their mail back postcards in order to meet the minimum response rate. Staff will then share this information with the Planning Group.
F - Possible Survey Result Scenarios
a) If the minimum response rate is met but the support rate is not, then the task force has one opportunity to revise the plan if desired. This would require modifying the plan to address the aspects of the plan that were not favored by residents. Modifying the plan would also require consulting the affected agencies, holding a public meeting to present the revised plan, and redistributing ballots to the study area. b) If the minimum response rate and support rate are met, then staff determines whether the proposed plan needs City Council approval. Conditions that may require Council approval are if a proposed plan needs certification of environmental documents, General Plan amendments, Community Plan amendments, or high project cost.
Traffic Calming Policy and Guidelines
c) If the plan needs City Council approval, and the plan is not supported by a majority of the Council, then the plan may be modified to address the aspects of the plan that were not favored. Similar to the plan revision described above, staff and the task force would have one opportunity for revision.
d) If the Council approves the plan, or if Council approval is not needed, then the plan continues to the implementation component.
3.2.3.2.3 Plan Implementation
The final component of the traffic calming process is project implementation.
A - Funding
Staff may develop a funding means for each plan as part of the annual CIP process, which will typically involve gas tax, sales tax, assessment districts, community block grants (if applicable to the area) and other transportation funding sources.
Staff and the task force may also want to seek grants or contributions from district funds or organizations.
This is also the opportunity for residents to fund upgrades. Collecting from residents for upgrades is not mandatory and may present challenges, especially when collecting from residents who don’t support traffic calming in their neighborhood. If funding for upgrades are needed, a funding collection mechanism, such as assessment districts, may be appropriate.
B - Phasing
If full funding is not available, the project may be phased to accommodate the funds available.
C – Design and Consultation
Staff will present the detailed project plans (project design) to affected agencies. If necessary, staff and the affected agencies may conduct field tests of the pending devices. For example, the fire department could test the effects of navigating fire engines through pending devices.
Traffic cones could be used to outline the dimensions of the devices and trial runs conducted to determine the impact on fire engine maneuverability.
D - Notification
Before construction, staff will notify the public and affected agencies (Fire, EMS, etc.) regarding the planned implementation of a traffic calming device. Notification helps ensure that motorists and other road users are familiar with the device before it is built.
E - Construction
The traffic calming devices can be constructed either as temporary or permanent devices.
Temporary devices can be constructed at staff’s discretion based on previous experience with the device. These temporary devices can be converted to permanent devices after six months of acceptable performance.
Traffic Calming Policy and Guidelines
If plans, specification and estimates were prepared for the neighborhood traffic calming control plan, and staff identified the funding for the project, then City Council approval for the construction contract will be required.
F - Education
Education is planned to run concurrently with Notification, Construction, and Monitoring in order to aid roadway users in the proper maneuvering within and around the pending devices.
Education helps ensure that all users can continue to use the roadway in a safe manner. Some examples include posting informational signs, hosting seminars, and distributing flyers.
G - Monitoring
After construction of the approved plan, staff will monitor the devices and collect data 3-6 months after implementation as well as rely on the task force and community members for feedback on the constructed devices.
H – Degree of Success
Based on the task force and/or community members’ feedback and collected data, staff will determine the next steps.
I – Next Steps
I-1 Leave Neighborhood Traffic Calming Control Plan As-Is For example, the approved plan may have produced reasonable and satisfactory results and therefore there is nothing further for City staff to do.
I-1 Return to Project Development
If the approved plan has not produced reasonable and satisfactory results, staff can recommend one or more of the following:
Collect additional traffic data as deemed appropriate. Modify constructed devices as deemed appropriate.
Construct additional speed reduction devices as deemed appropriate. Return to Project Development and modify the plan.
The plan can be revised once. This includes the removal of devices found to be ineffective. If staff determines that speed reduction devices will not adequately address the traffic-related concern, then staff can recommend the use of volume reduction measures.
Traffic Calming Policy and Guidelines
4 Design Guidance
Based on engineering judgment, traffic calming strategies should be considered whenever there is a need to reduce vehicle speeds and/or traffic volumes on a roadway or roadway network.
Increased consideration should be given to the following areas:
Along streets or roadway segments with a high percentage of speed-related collisions. In locations or facilities that generate high concentrations of bicyclists and pedestrians. To support transitions from high speed to low-speed contexts.
Traffic calming measures vary in their range of control, impact and cost. The fundamental differences in these measures are based on their basic purpose and design. Understanding these factors can increase the possibility that the best measure will be selected.
4.1 Purpose
As mentioned before, the purpose of the available traffic calming measures falls into two fundamental categories:
Devices that reduce “Speed”
Devices that reduce “Volume”.
Traffic calming measures are not intended to address safety issues at intersections, to mitigate noise or other externalities from roadway arterials. Traffic calming is also not meant to create any modal shift or alteration of the roadway network and should not be installed merely to create uses for the roadway that were not otherwise intended.
4.2 Design
4.2.1 Available Options
The design of traffic calming measures can be organized into four categories to assist in understanding the available options.
Awareness Measures:
Traffic calming awareness measures are designed to induce the driver to change their behavior voluntarily rather than through the requirements of a permanent physical device.
These measures typically involve using signage, pavement markings or visual cues and effectively reduce speeds or volumes by alerting drivers about pedestrian crossings, upcoming traffic calming devices or creating the threat of traffic tickets.
Awareness and safety are basic steps of traffic calming and should be examined as a primary measure before physical solutions are considered.
Traffic Calming Policy and Guidelines
Examples include centerline and lane striping, lane and pavement markings with visual cues, warning signs, turn restrictions and speed signs.
Vertical Deflection Measures
Traffic calming “vertical deflection measures” refers to physical design elements on a road that create a change in elevation, forcing drivers to slow down due to the bump or rise, essentially acting as a speed control mechanism.
Examples include speed humps, speed tables, raised intersections, and raised crosswalks.
Horizontal Deflection Measures
Traffic calming "horizontal deflection measures" refer to design elements that physically alter the path of vehicles by creating slight curves or offsets in the road, forcing drivers to slow down and navigate more carefully. Essentially, these measures are any feature that makes the road path less straight and more "zigzag-like.".
Examples include curb extensions (bulb-outs), chicanes, raised median islands, and on-street parking.
Diversion Measures:
The traffic calming “diversion measures” refer to design elements that divert traffic in a particular direction or prevent traffic from traveling through a certain point.
Examples of diversion measures include full or partial road closure, Cul de sac, median barriers, right in / right out island, diagonal diverters and turning restrictions.
4.2.2 Available Options by Purpose
Calming devices that reduce Speed
Calming devices that reduce speed are designed to reduce excessive neighborhood speeds to acceptable levels. These tools either induce drivers to reduce their own speeds through awareness measures or can directly force drivers to decrease their speeds via physical changes to the roadway, which can prohibit reckless driving behavior.
Speed reduction methods are generally preferable to volume reduction methods in that they do not increase travel distances for residents. Also, some devices, such as raised medians or bulbouts have a dual purpose of providing safer pedestrian crossings and making pedestrians more visible.
The various traffic calming measures which can reduce speed, include:
Awareness Measures
Roadway Striping
Traffic Calming Policy and Guidelines
In street pedestrian crossing signs
Crosswalk enhancement
Signage
Flashing beacons
Permanent Driver Feedback Sign
Temporary Radar Speed Trailer
Temporary Enforcement
Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon / HAWK
Gateway / Entrance Feature
Vertical Deflection Measures
Speed Cushions, Speed Humps
Speed Tables
Raised Crosswalk
Horizontal Deflection Measures
Angled Parking
Bulbouts/Pop-Outs/Curb Extension
Raised Crosswalks
Raised Median / Pedestrian Refuge
Roundabouts
Traffic Circles
Curb Radius Reduction
Short Intersection Median
Chokers
Treatment on Curve
Calming devices that reduce Volume
Traffic calming devices that reduce volume are designed to reduce excessive cut-through traffic on residential streets that should otherwise be traveling on collectors or arterials.
The traffic calming measures that reduce volume include:
Awareness Measures
Signage
Turn Restrictions
Diversionary Measures
Right-In / Right-Out Island
Full Street Closure / Cul-de-sac
Median Barriers/ Channelization
Diagonal Diverters
Partial Street Closures/ Semi-diverter
Traffic Calming Policy and Guidelines
4.2.3 Placement Considerations
The most important consideration in choosing what traffic calming device presents the best solution, is whether or not the tool can be physically implemented.
The selected calming device may be constrained by the limitations of the roadway, since residential streets vary in terms of the parking supply and need, roadway width, and the presence or width of sidewalks.
The location of the traffic calming device shall be placed where the full benefit of calming will be realized so long as there is little or no negative effect upon overall safety or quality of the roadway.
4.2.4 Design Considerations
Traffic calming devices shall be clearly marked and visible during the day and night. Where appropriate, they should include warning signs on all approaches of traffic affected by the device.
All physical devices shall be designed with aesthetics in mind to provide for visual contrast and landscaping in the roadway.
Traffic calming measures vary in effectiveness depending on their design. Effects of awareness and respect from drivers can differ depending on where the calming device is placed. Designing a traffic calming device should take into consideration if:
There is adequate provision of warning signs.
The device will maintain adequate sight distances along the roadway and at driveways and intersections for both drivers and pedestrians.
The device will settle into the character of its surroundings. The device will be viewed as a nuisance.
The device will be fully obeyed once it is placed.
The device will unsafely prevent emergency response vehicles from traveling to their destination.
The device will be placed near a school so that pedestrian crossings are not affected. The device will block access to driveways.
The device will block drainage.
The device will be marked, signed and visible during both daytime and nighttime hours.
The likelihood of driver compliance with new installations should also be evaluated based on the location and situation. A well-designed device will increase the possibility that drivers will obey the visual cues of the device.
4.3 Traffic Calming Trade-Offs
Traffic calming involves trade-offs, finding a balance between the need to provide an efficient transportation network and maintaining a livable and safe environment for bicyclists, pedestrians, and other street or street-adjacent users. The challenge of traffic calming is selecting the appropriate measures and locations to reach that balance.
Traffic Calming Policy and Guidelines
Traffic calming issues have shifted over the decades as communities across the country have embraced the concept of installing traffic calming on their roadways. Rapid response needs of emergency service providers remain a concern and policy to resolve such concerns has been developed. Funding of traffic calming however, continues to be an issue for many traffic calming programs and plans.
The design and installation of traffic calming devices should consider:
4.3.1 Travel Time Impacts:
Traffic calming in general is contrary to the purpose of driving – to get from one place to another in the shortest, most efficient manner. Traffic calming attempts to hinder driver natural behavior by introducing such things as speed reducing devices and restricting certain movements. These traffic calming measures increase travel time. When implementing a traffic calming treatment, it is understood that the motorists’ inconvenience is necessary to improve the quality of life for others.
For example, neighborhood residents may want to reduce traffic and speeding through their neighborhood by placing traffic calming measures on a cut-through route. This may negatively affect both the cut-through motorists and neighborhood residents alike.
4.3.2 Emergency Response Times:
Traffic calming creates a conflict between two public safety goals. Minimizing emergency response times is an important public safety objective. Reducing speeds on residential streets also increases public safety. Implementation of traffic calming furthers the goal of residential street safety, but it can hamper emergency response times. This trade-off needs to be recognized as a part of the traffic calming process.
4.3.3 Noise:
Another drawback that must be considered when choosing among various tools of traffic calming is the creation of additional noise, such as that which stems from many vertical measures. In selecting a traffic calming device, tools that are the least likely to bring with them the creation of additional noise should be given priority so as to maintain the environmental quality of the residential area.
4.3.4 Street Diversion:
Driver behavior is difficult to predict; therefore, the outcome of implementing a traffic calming treatment may not be as originally desired.
For example, introducing a speed reducing device may cause traffic to take another residential street. It should be considered unacceptable to merely reroute traffic to other residential streets unless the diversion results in a more equitable distribution of traffic.
Traffic Calming Policy and Guidelines
5. Speed Reduction Measures
5.1 Awareness Measures
Traffic Calming Policy and Guidelines
ADVANTAGES
Speed Reduction
Increase visibility of bikes to drivers
DISADVANTAGES
Possible loss of parking
ROADWAY STRIPING
Primary Purpose:
On: Residential, Collector and Major Arterial
ROADWAY STRIPING can change the appearance of the roadway, encouraging drivers to remain in designated lanes or drawing their attention to bike lanes.
Adding lane striping to a residential road without lane marking or bike lane may change the behavior of some drivers. By adding striping, the vehicle travel lanes are narrowed which will encourage slower speeds.
In general, vehicles will not travel in a designated bike lane. This can have a positive impact on both driver and bicycle safety.
SPEED REDUCTION
Traffic Calming Policy and Guidelines
ADVANTAGES
Increase visibility of pedestrian to
drivers. Driver compliance. DISADVANTAGES
Need appropriate width to avoid
conflicts with commercial vehicles
Only in uncontrolled pedestrian
crossing locations.
IN STREET PEDESTRIAN CROSSING SIGNS
Primary Purpose: Other Potential Results:
On: Residential, Collector and Minor Arterial
IN STREET PEDESTRIAN CROSSING SIGNS are placed within a roadway, either between travel lanes or in a median. The sign may be used to remind road users of laws regarding right of way at an unsignalized pedestrian crossing.
This sign is used with other crosswalk visibility enhancements to indicate preferred locations for people to cross and help reinforce the driver requirement to yield the right of way to pedestrians at designated pedestrian crossing locations.
PEDESTRIAN SAFETY SPEED REDUCTION
Traffic Calming Policy and Guidelines
ADVANTAGES
Increase visibility of pedestrian to
drivers. Driver compliance.
DISADVANTAGES
Installation costs
Only in uncontrolled pedestrian
crossing locations.
CROSSWALK ENHANCEMENT
Primary Purpose: Other Potential Results:
On: Residential, Collector and Minor Arterial
CROSSWALK ENHANCEMENT
Poor lighting and other factors that reduce driver visibility can cause safety issues at pedestrian crosswalks. In high speed or high vehicle traffic conditions, a substantially visible roadway crossing area could prevent or reduce the number of pedestrian-related collisions. Any number of enhancements may be combined to increase vehicle operators’ visibility of the crosswalk and pedestrian users.
Enhancement options include:
High-visibility crosswalk markings and marking patterns Improved lighting
Advance Stop/Yield/Pedestrian Crossing markings and signs Parking restrictions
Rectangular Rapid-Flashing Beacons (RRFB)
PEDESTRIAN SAFETY SPEED REDUCTION
Traffic Calming Policy and Guidelines
ADVANTAGES
Speed reduction
May discourage cut-through traffic
Raise driver awareness
DISADVANTAGES
Effect is often temporary
Drivers may not obey the device
without enforcement
SIGNAGE
Primary Purpose: Other Potential Results:
On: Residential, Collector and Minor Arterial
SIGNAGE comes in various forms. Depending on the given circumstances, these signs may make drivers aware of their surroundings. Upon leaving a major arterial, many people do not recognize when they enter a residential neighborhood. Installing speed limit signs can notify drivers that have entered a residential neighborhood. “School Zone” signs are installed at appropriate locations to remind drivers that there is a school and there are children in the vicinity.
SPEED REDUCTION PEDESTRIAN SAFETY
Traffic Calming Policy and Guidelines
ADVANTAGES
Speed reduction
Raise driver awareness
Customizable colors for different
situations
DISADVANTAGES
Potential distraction
Reduced visibility in bright light Misinterpretation
FLASHING BEACONS
Primary Purpose: Other Potential Results:
On: Residential, Collector, Minor and Major Arterial
FLASHING BEACONS use repeating flashing lights to warn motorists. They are used to draw motorists’ attention to a sign informing them of an upcoming change in the road conditions that could include unseen intersections, schools, curves, or other typical applications as shown below.
Typical Applications listed in CA MUTCD:
Signal ahead
Stop signs
Speed limit signs
Other warning and regulatory signs
Schools
Fire stations
Intersection control
At Intersections, where a more visible warning is desired.
SPEED REDUCTION PEDESTRIAN SAFETY
Traffic Calming Policy and Guidelines
ADVANTAGES
Speed reduction
Inexpensive attempt at traffic
calming
No increase in EMS/ Fire response
time
DISADVANTAGES
Changes in driver behavior are only
temporary
PERMANENT DRIVER FEEDBACK SIGN
Primary Purpose: Other Potential Results:
On: Residential, Collector, Minor and Major Arterial
PERMANENT SPEED FEEDBACK SIGNS are used to educate drivers of their speed, specially as they travel on residential streets. Speed Feedback Signs can be setup permanently for a more lasting effect when compared with radar speed trailer. This device can be a first attempt at getting drivers to reduce their speeds. The driver’s behavior may change when the feedback sign is first introduced; it will not necessarily modify driver behavior permanently.
SPEED REDUCTION VOLUME REDUCTION
Traffic Calming Policy and Guidelines
ADVANTAGES
Speed reduction
Inexpensive and temporary attempt
at traffic calming
No increase in EMS/ Fire response
time
Raises driver awareness
DISADVANTAGES
Changes in driver behavior are only
temporary
TEMPORARY RADAR SPEED TRAILER
Primary Purpose: Other Potential Results:
On: Residential, Collector, Minor and Major Arterial
PERMANENT SPEED FEEDBACK SIGNS are used to educate drivers of their speed, specially as they travel on residential streets. Radar speed trailers are mobile and can be used for a temporary warning device. This type of equipment can a first attempt at getting drivers to reduce their speed. The driver’s behavior may change when radar speed trailer is first introduced; it will not necessarily modify driver behavior permanently.
SPEED REDUCTION VOLUME REDUCTION
Traffic Calming Policy and Guidelines
ADVANTAGES
Speed reduction
No permanent roadway changes
DISADVANTAGES
Changes in driver behavior are only
temporary
TEMPORARY ENFORCEMENT
Primary Purpose: Other Potential Results:
On: Residential, Collector, Minor and Major Arterial
TEMPORARY ENFORCEMENT requires the presence of officers to monitor and enforce speeds and restrictions. Enforcement is usually used as a first attempt at reducing speeds and changing driver behavior. However, the influence of the police usually lasts as long as the officers are present. Based on the cost versus benefit, physical measures may have greater effect and could be more effective in the long run.
SPEED REDUCTION VOLUME REDUCTION
Traffic Calming Policy and Guidelines
ADVANTAGES
Enhance driver awareness of
pedestrian at uncontrolled
crossings
No permanent roadway changes
DISADVANTAGES
Maintaining minimum sidewalk clear
width in compliance with ADA
Right of way considerations Signal pole foundations can impact existing utilities
PEDESTRIAN HYBRID BEACONS/HAWK SIGNALS
Primary Purpose: Other Potential Results:
On: Residential, Collector, Minor and Major Arterial
PEDESTRIAN HYBRID BEACONS/HAWK Signals are a pedestrian-activated overhead signal consisting of two red lenses above a single yellow lens. The lenses remain “dark” until a pedestrian pushes the call button to activate the beacon, which then initiates a yellow to red lighting sequence that directs motorists to slow and come to a stop. The pedestrian hybrid beacon accompanied with appropriate signs and pavement markings provides greater visibility for locations, where a crosswalk is not accompanied by a signal-controlled intersection.
PEDESTRIAN SAFETY SPEED REDUCTION
Traffic Calming Policy and Guidelines
ADVANTAGES
May cause a reduction in speeds
May discourage cut-through traffic
May provide pedestrian crossing
refuge
Strengthens neighborhood identity
Changes driving environment
DISADVANTAGES
May cause difficulty for large vehicles
to make right turns
GATEWAY / ENTRANCE FEATURES
Primary Purpose: Other Potential Results:
On: Residential, Collector
GATEWAY / ENTRANCE FEATURES are used on local streets at the intersection with collectors or major arterials. The purpose of a gateway/entrance feature is to alert the driver that they have left the arterial roadway and have entered a residential neighborhood. Examples may include a median with a tree or neighborhood sign, and or texture roadway treatment.
SPEED REDUCTION PEDESTRIAN SAFETY
Traffic Calming Policy and Guidelines
5.2 Vertical Deflection Measures
Traffic Calming Policy and Guidelines
ADVANTAGES
Speed reduction
May discourage cut-through traffic
Changes driving environment
DISADVANTAGES
Uncomfortable for bicyclist and
vehicle passengers
Create noise
EMS/Fire vehicles forced to almost
stop at ramp
SPEED HUMPS
Primary Purpose: Other Potential Results:
On: Residential, Collector*
*May only be used on low ADT two lane collectors that do not have two-way left-turn lanes or dedicated left turn pockets
SPEED HUMPS are devices to encourage drivers to travel at lower speeds over the device. They are approximately 3 ½ inches high, have a parabolic-shape surface, and span the width of the road. The height causes the driver to be jolted if traveling at too high of a speed. However, due to the advance in vehicle suspension systems, this device may not affect all drivers. It must be cautioned that these devices do have a severe impact on emergency response services and can create uncomfortable situations for all passengers including those in ambulances.
SPEED REDUCTION VOLUME REDUCTION
COLLISION REDUCTION
Traffic Calming Policy and Guidelines
ADVANTAGES
Speed reduction
May discourage cut-through traffic
Will not impede EMS/Fire response
as much as traditional speed humps
DISADVANTAGES
Uncomfortable for bicyclist and
vehicle passengers
Create noise
SPEED CUSHIONS
Primary Purpose: Other Potential Results:
On: Residential, Collector*
*May only be used on low ADT two lane collectors that do not have two-way left-turn lanes or dedicated left turn pockets
SPEED CUSHIONS are similar to speed humps except that there are two tire cut-outs set far enough apart to allow for an emergency vehicle’s tire pathway to pass between each cushion. devices to encourage drivers to travel at lower speeds over the device.
They are approximately 3 ½ inches high, have a parabolic-shape surface, and span the width of the road. The pathway is set based on the axle width of a fire apparatus allowing emergency vehicles to pass through virtually unimpeded. Vehicles with narrower wheelbase would be forced to travel over the cushions.
SPEED REDUCTION VOLUME REDUCTION
COLLISION REDUCTION
Traffic Calming Policy and Guidelines
ADVANTAGES
Speed reduction
DISADVANTAGES
EMS/Fire vehicles forced to almost
stop at ramp
Create more noise from decelerating
and accelerating
May cause bicycle safety issues if
non-standard pavement treatments
are used
SPEED TABLE
Primary Purpose: Other Potential Results:
On: Residential, Collector*
*May only be used on low ADT two lane collectors that do not have two-way left-turn lanes or dedicated left turn pockets
SPEED TABLES provide vertical deflection. Instead of having a rounded surface, speed tables have ramps on either side leading to a flat table. The effectiveness of the speed table can be varied by changing the shape of the ramps and/or the texture of the table.
Steeper ramps will cause a greater reduction in speeds. Texture pavement may affect bicyclist but can be designed to take bike safety into account.
Speed tables can be used in conjunction with a midblock pedestrian crossing. The speed table may increase the visibility of pedestrians at mid-block locations (similar to a raised crosswalk).
SPEED REDUCTION VOLUME REDUCTION
COLLISION REDUCTION
Traffic Calming Policy and Guidelines
5.3 Horizontal Deflection Measures
Traffic Calming Policy and Guidelines
ADVANTAGES
Speed reduction
Maintains emergency response
access
Increase parking
DISADVANTAGES
May encourage cars from other
streets to use available parking
Potential Bike impacts
ANGLED PARKING
Primary Purpose: Other Potential Results:
On: Residential, Collector
ANGLED PARKING is generally used to increase the number of available parking spaces. However, a positive by-product can be reduction of vehicle speed. Drivers may slow down in anticipation of vehicles backing out from parking spaces.
Another option for angled parking is to provide back-in parkin which may decrease the accident potential associated with traditional back-out parking.
SPEED REDUCTION
Traffic Calming Policy and Guidelines
ADVANTAGES
Increase the visibility of pedestrians
to drivers
Speed reduction of through traffic
Speed reduction for right vehicles
DISADVANTAGES
Difficult for emergency vehicles and
larger vehicles to turn
May force bicyclists into travel
lanes
BULBOUTS / POP-OUTS / CURB EXTENSION
Primary Purpose: Other Potential Results:
On: Residential, Collector, Major
BULBOUTS, also known as Pop-Outs and Curb Extensions, narrows the width of a street at intersection locations by extending the curb into the parking lanes. This creates shorter crossing distance a pedestrian’s exposure time to oncoming vehicles. Bulbouts also may slow vehicles making right turns, as the potential turning radius is greatly reduced. By placing the pedestrian at the edge of the travel lane, both the pedestrian and the driver have a better view of each other. Bulbouts are best used in locations with high pedestrian volumes, such as downtown areas and near schools.
SPEED REDUCTION VOLUME REDUCTION
PEDESTRIAN SAFETY
COLLISION REDUCTION
Traffic Calming Policy and Guidelines
ADVANTAGES
Speed reduction
Improves visibility of pedestrians
and crossings
Can provide pedestrian mid-block
crossings
DISADVANTAGES
Loss of parking EMS/Fire vehicles forced to almost
stop at ramp. Creates more noise from vehicles
decelerating and accelerating
RAISED CROSSWALK
Primary Purpose: Other Potential Results:
On: Residential, Collector
RAISED CROSSWALKS are similar to speed tables; however, they provide a marked pedestrian crossing. This device can be used at intersections or mid-block locations.
Raised crosswalks are highly effective in areas with large volumes of pedestrian traffic, such as schools or downtown business districts.
Raised crosswalks can be combined with bulbouts or chokers to decrease the distance a pedestrian is in the vehicle travel way.
SPEED REDUCTION VOLUME REDUCTION
PEDESTRIAN SAFETY
Traffic Calming Policy and Guidelines
ADVANTAGES
Provides ability for a safer
pedestrian crossing
Possible opportunity for
landscaping
DISADVANTAGES
Potential loss of parking May restrict access to driveways in vicinity of devices
RAISED MEDIAN / PEDESTRIAN REFUGE
Primary Purpose: Other Potential Results:
On: Residential, Collector, Major
RAISED MEDIAN/PEDESTRIAN REFUGE are used on wide streets to shorten a pedestrian's crossing distance and provide pedestrians with a refuge. To provide refuge, the median should have a minimum width of 6'. This also allows the pedestrian to cross one direction of traffic at a time. After a pedestrian crosses one lane of traffic, they may wait in the median area before crossing the other lane of traffic. These medians can be landscaped to break up the sight line of the driver and enhance the aesthetics of the neighborhood. Landscaping also increases the visibility of the tool.
SPEED REDUCTION PEDESTRIAN SAFETY
VOLUME REDUCTION
Traffic Calming Policy and Guidelines
ADVANTAGES
Speed reduction
Possible opportunity for
landscaping Easier for larger vehicles to
navigate relative to traffic circles
Typically, more cost effective than
traditional signals
DISADVANTAGES
Potential loss of parking Greater expense relative to traffic circles
Potentially difficult for disabled
pedestrians to navigate
Increased EMS/Fire response
ROUNDABOUT
Primary Purpose: Other Potential Results:
On: Residential, Collector
ROUNDABOUTS are large circular medians placed in the center of an intersection.
Traffic flows around the median counterclockwise through the intersection. Drivers yield to vehicles already circulating within the intersection. Due to the horizontal deflection, vehicles must slow to maneuver around the intersection. Speeds can be reduced from multiple directions. The circular median and splitter islands can both be landscaped to help beautify the neighborhood.
In general, roundabouts are more expensive than traffic circles due to larger right-ofway requirements. However, roundabouts are typically more cost effective for an intersection compared with traditional traffic signals
SPEED REDUCTION VOLUME REDUCTION
COLLISION REDUCTION
Traffic Calming Policy and Guidelines
ADVANTAGES
Speed reduction
Possible opportunity for landscaping Possible decrease in intersection accidents with stop-controlled
intersections
DISADVANTAGES
Potential loss of parking Restricts turning movements by larger vehicles
Increased EMS/Fire response
TRAFFIC CIRCLES
Primary Purpose: Other Potential Results:
On: Residential
TRAFFIC CIRCLES are circular medians placed in the center of an intersection. Traffic flows around the median counterclockwise through the intersection. Drivers yield to vehicles already circulating within the intersection. These devices may reduce speeds through neighborhoods. Due to the horizontal deflection, vehicles must slow to maneuver around the device. The circular median can be landscaped to help beautify the neighborhood.
Depending on right-of-way and budget constraints, either a traffic circle or roundabout can be installed. Unlike roundabouts, traffic circles do not have splitter islands on each approach to help guide traffic around the roundabout due to their smaller size. Large emergency vehicles like fire trucks are permitted to turn left in front of circle.
SPEED REDUCTION VOLUME REDUCTION
PEDESTRIAN SAFETY
COLLISION REDUCTION
Traffic Calming Policy and Guidelines
ADVANTAGES
Slow right turn speeds
May discourage cut through traffic
Increase the visibility of pedestrian to
drivers
Shorten pedestrian crossing distance
DISADVANTAGES
Difficult for larger vehicles to make
right turn
CURB RADIUS REDUCTION
Primary Purpose: Other Potential Results:
On: Residential, Collector, Major
CURB RADIUS REDUCTIONS provide tighter corner radii at intersections. This treatment may reduce the right-turn speed of vehicles. By reducing right-turn speeds, some drivers may be discouraged from cutting through the neighborhood. It also will increase the visibility of pedestrians to drivers and shorten the crossing distance for pedestrians.
This treatment may cause difficultly for larger vehicles. Some larger vehicles may not be able to make the turn without crossing into the opposing travel lane. This treatment may not be appropriate in areas that experience high volumes of large vehicles.
SPEED REDUCTION PEDESTRIAN SAFETY
COLLISION REDUCTION
Traffic Calming Policy and Guidelines
ADVANTAGES
Potential for reduction of left-turn
speeds Possible opportunity for landscaping Refuge for pedestrians
DISADVANTAGES
Potential loss of parking May restrict access to driveway in vicinity of device May restrict turning movements by
larger vehicles
SHORT INTERSECTION MEDIAN
Primary Purpose: Other Potential Results:
On: Residential, Collector
SHORT INTERSECTION MEDIAN can be installed on any leg of an intersection to slow fast-turning vehicles. The median forces vehicles to make a turn along a smaller radius, rather than making a higher speed turn on a larger radius, thereby slowing traffic. This device may also be installed at mid-block locations to achieve the same effect by forcing traffic to shift its path to travel safely around the median. However, this tool may block access to some driveways. Also, it may require removing some parking. The medians may restrict some larger vehicles, such as fire trucks, buses or moving vans, from making left turns at the intersection.
SPEED REDUCTION PEDESTRIAN SAFETY
COLLISION REDUCTION
Traffic Calming Policy and Guidelines
ADVANTAGES
Speed reduction
Possible opportunity for landscaping Potential midblock crossing location if combined with pedestrian crossing
features
DISADVANTAGES
Loss of some on-street parking in
vicinity of treatment Potential increased maintenance
CHOKERS
Primary Purpose: Other Potential Results:
On: Residential, Collector
CHOKERS are created by installing curb extensions at locations on opposite sides of a roadway. This narrows the road, but still maintains two-way traffic. This form of traffic management works best at mid-block locations that have sufficient enough volumes so that opposing traffic would be passing the choker at or near the same point in time. This discourages drivers from traveling down the center of the roadway to avoid any impacts of the chokers. There should be enough roadway width maintained between the chokers to accommodate bicycle and vehicle traffic.
SPEED REDUCTION VOLUME REDUCTION
COLLISION REDUCTION
Traffic Calming Policy and Guidelines
ADVANTAGES
Speed reduction
DISADVANTAGES
Potential loss of parking May restrict access to driveways in vicinity of device
May create noise
TREATMENT ON CURVE
Primary Purpose: Other Potential Results:
On: Residential, Collector
TREATMENT ON CURVES intends to prevent vehicles from drifting into the opposing lane while traveling around a sharp curve. By eliminating the ability to travel into the opposing lane, speeds are generally reduced around the curve. Raised pavement markers (Botts dots) can be installed. Also, medians can be installed if there is sufficient roadway width. However, median installation has the potential to block driveway access. Openings may be cut in the median or the median may be mountable, to accommodate this situation.
SPEED REDUCTION COLLISION REDUCTION
Traffic Calming Policy and Guidelines
6. Volume Reduction Measures
6.1 Awareness Measures
Traffic Calming Policy and Guidelines
ADVANTAGES
May discourage cut-through traffic
Maintains emergency response
access
DISADVANTAGES
May Increase trip length for many
residents
May increase traffic on adjacent
roadways
Drivers can bypass device
TURN RESTRICTION
Primary Purpose: Other Potential Results:
On: Residential, Collector, Major
TURN RESTRICTIONS can help reduce cut-through traffic or eliminate turn movements.
Turn restrictions such as “No Right Turn 6AM-9AM” may help reduce traffic from cutting through a residential neighborhood to avoid a congested arterial. This type of treatment, however, relies on enforcement to make sure drivers are abiding by the restriction.
VOLUME REDUCTION SPEED REDUCTION
Traffic Calming Policy and Guidelines
6.2 Diversionary Measures
Traffic Calming Policy and Guidelines
ADVANTAGES
Slows right turn speeds
May discourage cut-through traffic
May provide pedestrian refuge
DISADVANTAGES
Difficult for large vehicles to make
right-turn
May shift traffic to adjacent streets
RIGHT-IN/RIGHT-OUT ISLAND
Primary Purpose: Other Potential Results:
On: Residential, Collector
RIGHT-IN/RIGHT-OUT ISLANDS restrict left-turns into and out of a particular street.
Rather than relying on a sign to discourage drivers from turning left, right-in/right-out islands force drivers to make the desired movement using a raised median.
The right-in/ right-out island can be constructed to restrict a single left-turn. For example, the left-turn out may be restricted, but the left-turn in may be maintained.
This device may be particularly effective at locations where local streets intersect with uncontrolled collector streets. If a left-turn in or out of a particular street is difficult due to speed or sight distance, the installation of a right-in/ right-out island may be very beneficial. However, on low volume roadways, the device may be ineffective as drivers may still be able to make left turns, thereby bypassing he device.
VOLUME REDUCTION SPEED REDUCTION
PEDESTRIAN SAFETY
COLLISION REDUCTION
Traffic Calming Policy and Guidelines
ADVANTAGES
Eliminate cut-through traffic
Potential landscaping opportunity
DISADVANTAGES
Will change neighborhood Traffic
patterns
Will increase trip length for many
residents
Will increase traffic in adjacent
roadways
Emergency response routes may
lengthen
FULL STREET CLOSURE/CUL-DE-SAC
Primary Purpose: Other Potential Results:
On: Residential
FULL STREET CLOSURES/CUL-DE-SACS are created by constructing a barrier across the entire street to all through traffic. This measure will have a drastic effect on local traffic circulation. They are used to force changes in travel patterns – such as preventing cut-through traffic in residential neighborhoods or to eliminate dangerous or problematic intersections. Adjacent roadways will experience an increase in traffic due to the closure and local residents will have longer travel routes.
Full street closures should be constructed in a manner that maintains pedestrian, bicycle, and emergency vehicle access.
VOLUME REDUCTION SPEED REDUCTION
COLLISION REDUCTION
Traffic Calming Policy and Guidelines
ADVANTAGES
Effective in reducing cut through traffic
Possible opportunity for landscaping
Can reduce traffic volumes on residential
streets
DISADVANTAGES
May shift problem to neighboring roads
Restricts access to neighborhood
Restricts EMS/ Fire access
May cause difficulty in mapping routes
to a location due to roadway change
MEDIAN BARRIER / CHANNELIZATION
Primary Purpose: Other Potential Results:
On: Residential, Collector
MEDIAN BARRIERS/CHANNELIZATION help prevent cut-through traffic in residential neighborhoods. The raised median is used on the major street, restricting traffic from continuing from one residential neighborhood to the next. The median barrier also restricts left-turns from the major street into the residential neighborhoods. Typically, right-in and rightout are the only turn movements allowed to and from the minor street. However, a variation on the median barrier is an "S" Median which allows for left turn movements from the major street onto the minor street but still prevents through traffic from crossing.
Median barriers can also help improve traffic flow along the major street. Stacking caused by vehicles waiting for a gap to make a left turn will be eliminated. Median barriers can also help improve intersection safety due to a decrease in conflicting intersection turn movements.
Pedestrians may also use the median barrier as a refuge while crossing the major street, given a minimum median width of 6'. Pedestrians would only have to be concerned with one direction of traffic at a time.
Median barriers can help reduce cut-through on residential streets. However, they inevitably result in changes to travel patterns which can shift problems elsewhere. They also may cause inconvenience to residents and delays to emergency response vehicles.
VOLUME REDUCTION SPEED REDUCTION
PEDESTRIAN SAFETY
COLLISION REDUCTION
Traffic Calming Policy and Guidelines
ADVANTAGES
Eliminate cut-through traffic
Potential landscaping opportunity
DISADVANTAGES
Will change neighborhood Traffic
patterns
Will increase trip length for some
residents
Will increase traffic in adjacent
roadways
Emergency response routes may
lengthen
DIAGONAL DIVERTER
Primary Purpose: Other Potential Results:
On: Residential
DIAGONAL DIVERTERS are barriers constructed diagonally across a four-legged intersection blocking the through movements. Diagonal diverters can create circuitous routes for those accessing adjacent properties, including emergency services. Some neighborhood roads may experience an increase in traffic, while others experience a decrease due to the change in traffic circulation. Design features of the diverter could allow for pedestrian, bicycle, and EMS/ Fire access.
VOLUME REDUCTION SPEED REDUCTION
COLLISION REDUCTION
Traffic Calming Policy and Guidelines
ADVANTAGES
Eliminate cut-through traffic in one
direction
Potential landscaping opportunity
Maintains emergency response
access
DISADVANTAGES
Will change neighborhood Traffic
patterns
Will increase trip length for many
residents
Will increase traffic in adjacent
roadways
Drivers can bypass device
PARTIAL STREET CLOSURE/SEMI DIVERTER
Primary Purpose: Other Potential Results:
On: Residential
PARTIAL STREET CLOSURES/SEMI-DIVERTERS are barriers that block one direction of travel. This device can be used to block entering or exiting traffic, depending on the specific neighborhood problem. They are used to prevent drivers from making certain turn movements at an intersection. Partial street closures can effectively reduce traffic volumes on a street although the diverted traffic may impact adjacent streets.
Careful consideration must be given when installing a partial street closure. Pedestrian and bicycle access should be maintained when using this device. Any road closure can create circuitous travel routes for residents in the affected neighborhood. Closures will also increase traffic volumes on adjacent roadways due to the changes in residents' travel patterns.
VOLUME REDUCTION SPEED REDUCTION
PEDESTRIAN SAFETY
COLLISION REDUCTION
MEMORANDUM
Date:
To:
December 16, 2024
John A. Corella, Director of Public Works
From:
Re:
Armando J. Garcia Baldizzone, P.E. City Engineer
Whispering Palms Trail – Between Ramon Road and Baristo Road Temporary Traffic Calming Study
This report presents the results of the speed surveys completed in the City of Cathedral City, California, on Whispering Palm Trail between Ramon Road and Baristo Road as requested by a Cathedral City Resident at 31720 Whispering Palms Trail.
Roadway Characteristics
Whispering Palms Trail is a two-lane local (residential) street with parking on both sides that extends north-south between Durango Road and Dinah Shore Drive. The posted speed limit on Whispering Palms Trail is 25 miles per hour (mph).
The parameters for the implementation of traffic calming devices in residential areas is as follows:
Parameter 1: The measured 85th percentile speed of traffic shall be equal to or greater than 35 mph.
Parameter 2: 70% of the measured speeds shall be in excess of 25 mph.
Speed Survey Data Collection
The Engineering Department conducted a speed radar survey and speed feedback survey on the quarter mile roadway segment of Whispering Palm Trail between Ramon Road and Baristo Road within the following periods of time:
•
•
July 16, 2024, through July 22, 2024 (7 days) - Speed Radar Survey July 22, 2024, through July 29, 2024 (7 Days) - Speed Feedback Sign Survey.
Traffic Calming Step 1: Speed Radar Survey– July 16, 2024, through July 22,2024 Speed Radar Survey Results:
1. Parameter 1 was met with the 85th percentile speed of traffic being 35 mph.
2. Parameter 2 was met with an average of 73% of the measured speed being over the posted speed limit.
1 With the 85th percentile speed recorded and the percentage of speed violations greater than or equal to the allowable threshold for residential areas, staff proceeded to Step 2 of the traffic calming process.
Traffic Calming Step 2: Speed Feedback Signs – July 22, 2024, through July 29, 2024 Speed Feedback Sign Survey Results:
1. Parameter 1 was not met with the 85th percentile speed of traffic being 30 mph.
2. Parameter 2 was not met with an average of 48% of the measured speed being over the posted speed limit.
The data obtained showed a reduction in speed that falls within the permissible limits of the 85th percentile speed and percentage of speed violations. Therefore, the street segment does not require additional temporary calming measures.
Summary Table:
Whispering Palms Trail – Between Ramon Road and Baristo Road Location: Speed Limit: 25 MPH
Traffic
Calming
Step
Average
Speed
(MPH)
Percentage
of Speeders
(%)
85th Percentile Speed
Time Frame Device Measured (MPH)
07/16/2024 -
07/22/2024 Speed Radar 1
2 29 35
30 73
49 Speed
Feedback
Sign
07/22/2024 -
07/29/2024 25
Recommendation
The Engineering Department recommends that the city maintain the current speed limit at 25 mph and implement the following traffic calming measures:
1. Upgrade the northbound and southbound 25 mph speed signs with yellow solar flashing beacons or flashing speed limit signs.
2. Installation of speed feedback signs.
3. Installation of centerline pavement striping for local/residential roadways with speeds up to 40 mph per the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CD MUTCD) standards. The centerline striping shall extend from along Whispering Palms Trail between 30th Avenue and Dinah Shore Drive.
4. Utilize police traffic enforcement.
All the above-mentioned traffic calming measures will be included in the design and construction of Whisp
Drive.
III Bike Route Project that will extend from 30th Avenue to Dinah Shore Arman
City En
P.E.
2 •
•
EXHIBIT A – SPEED SURVEY- WHISPERING PALMS TRL – BETWEEN RAMON ROAD AND BARISTO ROAD: 2024-07-16 TO 2024-07-22
EXHIBIT B – WEEKLY REPORT SPEED FEEDBACK SIGN: 2024-07-22 TO 2024-07-29 3 For Project: Traffic Calming - 31720 Whispering Palms Trail 31720 Whispering Palms Trail
Merged
Project Notes: Exhibit A – Speed Survey
Location/Name:
Report Generated:
Speed Intervals
Time Intervals
11/4/2024
1 MPH
5:45:49 PM
10:00:00 AM
on
Instant
7/16/2024
35 MPH
8719
Traffic Report From
85th Percentile Speed
85th Percentile Vehicles
Max Speed
through 7/22/2024
2:35:33 PM
7:59:59 AM
61 MPH
10258
7/18/2024
Total Vehicles
AADT: 1733
Volumes -
weekly counts
Time 5 Day
1427
129
7 Day
1465
109
Average Daily
AM Peak 7:00 AM
PM Peak 5:00 PM 137 119
Speed
Speed Limit: 25
85th Percentile Speed: 35
50th Percentile Speed:
10 MPH Pace Interval:
Average Speed:
28 23.0 MPH
28.59 Monday
197
to 33.0 MPH
Tuesday
875
Wednesday
1326
Thursday
1325
Friday
1429
73.6 Saturday
1285
74.5 Sunday
1037
74.2 Count over limit
% over limit
Avg Speeder
Avg Speed
67.7 73.5 70.5 72.4
31.4 30.6 30.9 30.8 30.8 31.0 31.0
28.4 28.5 28.3 28.6 28.6 28.8 28.8
Class Counts
Number %
VEH_SM 4 0
VEH_MED 9735 94.9
VEH_LG 519 5.1
[VEH_SM=motorcycle, VEH_MED = sedan, VEH_LG = truck]
Exhibit B - Speed Feedback Sign Custom Report
Location:
Address:
31720 Whispering Palms Trail - NORTH Report Period: 2024-07-22 to 2024-07-29 31720 Whispering Palms Trail 9854
25 mph
Total Vehicle Count:
Speed Limit:
Date/Time
2024-07-22
2024-07-23
2024-07-24
2024-07-25
2024-07-26
2024-07-27
2024-07-28
2024-07-29
Summary
% of Speed Violations Average Speed (mph) Max Speed (mph) 85% Speed (mph) H 52 % H 30
49 %
H 25
H 25
H 45
43 H 30
47 % 24 42 H 30
50 % H 25 H 45
42 H 30
48 % 24 H 30
47 % 24 44 H 30
49 % H 25 H 45
42 H 30
H 52 %
AVG: 49 %
H 25 H 30
AVG: 25 mph AVG: 30 mph
H - highest value in the column, bolded H is highest H value in report ** "n/a" - means the sign did not collect any data at the time stipulated in the report. "n/a" values are NOT included in calculations.
Generated on December 16, 2024 at 7:50 AM SafePace Cloud powered by Web Director®
MEMORANDUM
Date:
To:
December 16, 2024
Armando J. Garcia Baldizzone, P.E. City Engineer
From: Andres Perez, Assistant Engineer
Re: Vega Road – Between Kieth Avenue and Landau Boulevard Temporary Traffic Calming Study
This report presents the results of the traffic calming study completed in the City of Cathedral City, California, on Vega Road between Kieth Avenue and Landau Boulevard as requested by a Cathedral City Resident at 67808 Vega Road.
Roadway Characteristics
Vega Road is two-lane local (residential) street with parking on both sides that extends west-east between Keith Avenue and Avenida Los Ninos. The posted speed limit on Vega Road is 25 miles per hour (mph).
The parameters for the implementations of traffic calming devices in for residential areas is as follows:
Parameter 1: The measured 85th percentile speed of traffic shall be equal to or greater than 35 mph.
Parameter 2: 70% of the measured speeds shall be in excess of 25 mph.
Speed Survey Data Collection
The Engineering Department conducted a speed radar survey on the roadway segment of Vega Road between Kieth Avenue and Landau Boulevard within the following time period:
• July 31, 2024, through August 06, 2024 (7 days) – Speed Radar Survey Traffic Calming Step 1: Speed Radar Survey– July 31, 2024, through August 06, 2024 Speed Radar Survey Results:
1. Parameter 1 was not met with 85th percentile speed was 31 mph (less than 35 mph).
2. Parameter 2 was not met with an average of 50% of the measured speed being over the posted speed limit.
1 Summary Table:
Vega Road – Between Kieth Avenue and Landau Boulevard
Location: Speed Limit: 25 MPH
Traffic
Calming
Step
Average
Speed
(MPH)
Percentage
85th Percentile Speed of Speeders
Time Frame Device Measured (MPH) (%)
7/13/2024 -
8/06/2024 Speed Radar 1 25 31 50
Recommendation
The Engineering Department recommends that the City maintain the current speed limit at 25 mph and not im traffic calming measures.
Arma
City E
e, P.E.
• EXHIBIT A – SPEED SURVEY VEGA ROAD – BETWEEN KIETH AVENUE AND LANDAU
BOULEVARD
2 For Project: Traffic Calming - Vega Rd
Project Notes: Exhibit A - Speed Survey
Location/Name:
Report Generated:
Speed Intervals
Time Intervals
Merged
11/5/2024
1 MPH
Instant
7/31/2024
31 MPH
1142
11:56:19 AM
7:00:00 AM
on
Traffic Report From
85th Percentile Speed
85th Percentile Vehicles
Max Speed
through 8/6/2024 1:59:59 PM
51 MPH
1344
8/5/2024 10:56:33 AM
Total Vehicles
AADT: 253
Volumes -
weekly counts
Time 5 Day
239
41 7 Day
Average Daily
AM Peak
224
8:00 AM 31
PM Peak 4:00 PM 19 15
Speed
Speed Limit: 25
85th Percentile Speed:
50th Percentile Speed:
10 MPH Pace Interval:
Average Speed:
31 25
21.0 MPH
24.83 Monday
48 to 31.0 MPH
Tuesday
52 50.0
30.0 26.2
Wednesday
127
Thursday
132
Friday
137
Saturday
129
Sunday
Count over limit 77
% over limit
Avg Speeder
Avg Speed
48.0 30.0
25.9 33.5 55.9 56.4
29.4 25.9
52.7 54.6
29.5 25.7
28.9 29.5 29.8
22.6 25.8 25.5
Class Counts
Number %
VEH_SM 14 1
VEH_MED 1148 85.4
VEH_LG 182 13.5
[VEH_SM=motorcycle, VEH_MED = sedan, VEH_LG = truck]
MEMORANDUM
Date:
To:
December 16, 2024
Armando J. Garcia Baldizzone, P.E. City Engineer
From: Andres Perez, Assistant Engineer
Re: Whispering Palms Trail – Between Mission Indian Trail and 33rd Avenue Temporary Traffic Calming Study
This report presents the results of the traffic calming study completed in the City of Cathedral City, California, on Whispering Palm Trail between Mission Indian Trail and 33rd Avenue as requested by a Cathedral City Resident at 32660 Whispering Palms Trail.
Roadway Characteristics
Whispering Palms Trail is a two-lane local (residential) street with parking on both sides that extends north-south between Durango Road and Dinah Shore Drive. The posted speed limit on Whispering Palms Trail is 25 miles per hour (mph).
The parameters for the implementations of traffic calming devices in residential areas is as follows:
Parameter 1: The measured 85th percentile speed of traffic shall be equal to or greater than 35 mph.
Parameter 2: 70% of the measured speeds shall be in excess of 25 mph.
Speed Survey Data Collection
The Engineering Department conducted a speed radar survey and speed feedback survey on the quarter mile roadway segment of Whispering Palm Trail between Mission Indian Trail and 33rd Avenue within the following periods of time:
•
•
August 13, 2024, through August 21, 2024 (8 days) - Speed Radar Survey August 26, 2024, through September 04, 2024 (7 Days) - Speed Feedback Sign Survey This section presents the speed survey results conducted on Whispering Palms Trail during the specified period mentioned above.
Traffic Calming Step 1: Speed Radar Survey– August 13, 2024, through August 21 Speed Radar Survey Results:
1. Parameter 1 was met with the 85th percentile speed of traffic being 38 mph. 1 2. Parameter 2 was met with an average of 90% of the measured speed being over the posted speed limit.
With the 85th percentile speed recorded and the percentage of speed violations greater than the allowable threshold for residential areas, staff proceeded to Step 2 of the traffic calming process.
Traffic Calming Step 2: Speed Feedback Signs – August 26, 2024, through September 04, 2024 Speed Feedback Sign Survey Results:
1. Parameter 1 was not met with the 85th percentile speed being 31 mph.
2. Parameter 2 was not met with an average of 54% of the measured speed being over the posted speed limit.
The data obtained showed a reduction in speed that falls within the permissible limits of the 85th percentile speed and percentage of speed violations. Therefore, the street segment does not require additional temporary measures.
Summary Table:
Whispering Palms Trail – Between Mission Indian Trail And 33rd Avenue Location: Speed Limit: 25 MPH
Traffic
Calming
Step
Average
Speed
(MPH)
Percentage
of Speeders
(%)
85th Percentile Speed
Time Frame Device Measured (MPH)
8/13/2024 -
8/21/2024 Speed Radar 1
2 33 38
31 90
54 Speed
Feedback
Sign
8/26/2024 -
09/04/2024 25
Recommendation
The Engineering Department recommends that the city maintain the current speed limit at 25 mph and implement the following traffic calming measures:
1. Upgrade the northbound and southbound 25 mph speed signs with yellow solar flashing beacons or flashing speed limit signs.
2. Installation of speed feedback signs.
3. Installation of centerline pavement striping for local/residential roadways with speeds up to 40 mph per the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CD MUTCD) standards. The centerline striping shall extend from along Whispering Palms Trail between 30th Avenue and Dinah Shore Drive.
4. Utilize police traffic enforcement.
2 All of the above-mentioned traffic calming measures will be included in the design and construction of Whispering Palms Trail Class III Bike Route Project that will extend from 30th Avenue to Dinah Shore Driv
Arm
City
ne, P.E.
• EXHIBIT A – SPEED SURVEY: WHISPERING PALMS TRL – BETWEEN MISSION INDIAN TRL AND 33RD AVE
• EXHIBIT B - WEEKLY REPORT SPEED FEEDBACK SIGN: 2024-08-28 TO 2024-09-04 3 Exhibit A - Speed Radar
&ŽƌꢀWƌŽũĞĐƚ͗ dƌĂĨĨŝĐꢀꢁĂůŵŝŶŐꢀͲꢀtŚŝƐƉĞƌŝŶŐꢀWĂůŵƐꢀdƌůꢀďĞƚǁĞŶꢀDŝŝƐƐŝŽŶꢀ/ŶĚŝĂŶꢀdƌĂŝůꢀĂŶĚꢀϯϯƌĚꢀꢂǀĞŶƵĞ͘ WƌŽũĞĐƚꢀEŽƚĞƐ͗
>ŽĐĂƚŝŽŶͬEĂŵĞ͗
ZĞƉŽƌƚꢀ'ĞŶĞƌĂƚĞĚ͗
^ƉĞĞĚꢀ/ŶƚĞƌǀĂůƐ
dŝŵĞꢀ/ŶƚĞƌǀĂůƐ
DĞƌŐĞĚ
ϵͬϮϱͬϮϬϮϰ
ϭꢀDW,
ϵ͗ϯϳ͗ϮϵꢀꢂD
ϭϬ͗ϬϬ͗ϬϬꢀꢂD
ŽŶ
/ŶƐƚĂŶƚ
ϴͬϭϯͬϮϬϮϰ
ϯϴꢀDW,
ϭϲϴϬϯ
dƌĂĨĨŝĐꢀZĞƉŽƌƚꢀ&ƌŽŵ
ϴϱƚŚꢀWĞƌĐĞŶƚŝůĞꢀ^ƉĞĞĚ
ϴϱƚŚꢀWĞƌĐĞŶƚŝůĞꢀsĞŚŝĐůĞƐ
DĂdžꢀ^ƉĞĞĚ
ƚŚƌŽƵŐŚ ϴͬϮϭͬϮϬϮϰ
ϱ͗ϰϬ͗ϬϮꢀꢂD
ϭ͗ϱϵ͗ϱϵꢀWD
ϴϯꢀDW,
ϭϵϳϲϴ
ϴͬϭϳͬϮϬϮϰ
dŽƚĂůꢀsĞŚŝĐůĞƐ
ꢂꢂꢃd͗ ϮϰϮϬ
sŽůƵŵĞƐꢀͲ
ǁĞĞŬůLJꢀĐŽƵŶƚƐ
dŝŵĞ ϱꢀꢁĂLJ
ϮϮϴϲ
ϮϬϯ
ϳꢀꢁĂLJ
ϮϮϭϴ
ϭϲϴ
ꢂǀĞƌĂŐĞꢀꢃĂŝůLJ
ꢂDꢀWĞĂŬ ϳ͗ϬϬꢀꢂD
WDꢀWĞĂŬ ϰ͗ϬϬꢀWD ϭϵϰ ϭϳϴ
^ƉĞĞĚ
^ƉĞĞĚꢀ>ŝŵŝƚ͗ Ϯϱ
ϴϱƚŚꢀWĞƌĐĞŶƚŝůĞꢀ^ƉĞĞĚ͗
ϱϬƚŚꢀWĞƌĐĞŶƚŝůĞꢀ^ƉĞĞĚ͗
ϭϬꢀDW,ꢀWĂĐĞꢀ/ŶƚĞƌǀĂů͗
ꢂǀĞƌĂŐĞꢀ^ƉĞĞĚ͗
ϯϴ
ϯϯ
Ϯϴ͘ϬꢀDW,
ϯϮ͘ϲϱ
DŽŶĚĂLJ
Ϯϭϱϭ
ϵϭ͘ϳ
ƚŽ ϯϴ͘ϬꢀDW,
dƵĞƐĚĂLJ
ϰϭϯϬ
ϵϬ͘Ϯ
tĞĚŶĞƐĚĂLJ
ϯϰϳϱ
dŚƵƌƐĚĂLJ
ϮϭϮϲ
&ƌŝĚĂLJ
ϮϮϲϳ
ϵϬ͘ϰ
^ĂƚƵƌĚĂLJ
ϭϵϲϲ
ϴϵ͘ϵ
^ƵŶĚĂLJ
ϭϲϵϬ
ϴϴ͘ϰ
ꢁŽƵŶƚꢀŽǀĞƌꢀůŝŵŝƚ
йꢀŽǀĞƌꢀůŝŵŝƚ
ꢂǀŐꢀ^ƉĞĞĚĞƌ
ꢂǀŐꢀ^ƉĞĞĚ
ϴϵ͘Ϯ ϵϬ͘ϵ
ϯϰ͘ϭ ϯϯ͘ϳ ϯϯ͘ϲ ϯϰ͘Ϭ ϯϯ͘ϳ ϯϯ͘ϵ ϯϯ͘ϳ
ϯϯ͘ϭ ϯϮ͘ϲ ϯϮ͘ϰ ϯϯ͘Ϭ ϯϮ͘ϲ ϯϮ͘ϴ ϯϮ͘ϰ
ꢂůĂƐƐꢀꢂŽƵŶƚƐ
EƵŵďĞƌ й
sꢄ,ͺ^D ϰ Ϭ
sꢄ,ͺDꢄꢃ ϭϵϭϮϬ ϵϲ͘ϳ
sꢄ,ͺ>' ϲϰϰ ϯ͘ϯ
sꢄ,ͺ^DсŵŽƚŽƌĐLJĐůĞ͕ sꢄ,ͺDꢄꢃꢀсꢀƐĞĚĂŶ͕ sꢄ,ͺ>'ꢀсꢀƚƌƵĐŬ
Exhibit B - Speed Feedback Sign Custom Report
Location:
Address:
NORTH - Whispering Palms Trail between Mission Indian Trl & 33rd Report Period: 2024-08-28 to 2024-09-04 Whispering Palms Trail 7651
25 mph
Total Vehicle Count:
Speed Limit:
Date/Time
2024-08-28
2024-08-29
2024-08-30
2024-08-31
2024-09-01
2024-09-02
2024-09-03
2024-09-04
Summary
% of Speed Violations Average Speed (mph) Max Speed (mph) 85% Speed (mph) 39 % H 29
40 %
H 23
H 23
42 37 H 29
41 % H 23 H 46
41 H 29
38 % H 23 H 29
H 42 %
40 %
H 23 40 H 29
H 23 42 H 29
41 % H 23 40 H 29
H 42 %
AVG: 40 %
H 23 40 H 29
AVG: 23 mph AVG: 29 mph
H - highest value in the column, bolded H is highest H value in report ** "n/a" - means the sign did not collect any data at the time stipulated in the report. "n/a" values are NOT included in calculations.
Generated on December 16, 2024 at 7:57 AM SafePace Cloud powered by Web Director® Exhibit B - Speed Feedback Sign Custom Report
Location:
Address:
SOUTH - Whispering Palms Trail between Mission Indian Trl & 33rd Report Period: 2024-08-28 to 2024-09-04 Whispering Palms Trail 9260
25 mph
Total Vehicle Count:
Speed Limit:
Date/Time
2024-08-28
2024-08-29
2024-08-30
2024-08-31
2024-09-01
2024-09-02
2024-09-03
2024-09-04
Summary
% of Speed Violations Average Speed (mph) Max Speed (mph) 85% Speed (mph) 63 %
66 %
27 27
46 45
33 H 34
68 % 27 H 51
50 33
69 % 27 33
H 70 % H 34
H 70 %
H 70 %
69 %
H 28 50
H 28 45 33
H 28 H 51
47 H 34
H 28 33
AVG: 68 % AVG: 28 mph AVG: 33 mph
H - highest value in the column, bolded H is highest H value in report ** "n/a" - means the sign did not collect any data at the time stipulated in the report. "n/a" values are NOT included in calculations.
Generated on December 16, 2024 at 8:07 AM SafePace Cloud powered by Web Director®
MEMORANDUM
Date:
To:
December 16, 2024
Armando J. Garcia Baldizzone, P.E. City Engineer
From: Andres Perez, Assistant Engineer
Re: Avenida Ximino – Between McCallum Way and Baristo Road Temporary Traffic Calming Study
This report presents the results of the traffic calming study completed in the City of Cathedral City, California, on Avenida Ximino between McCallum Way and Baristo Road as requested by a Cathedral City Resident.
Roadway Characteristics
Avenida Ximino is a two-lane local (residential) street with parking on both sides that extends north-south between Senora Road and Ramon Road. The posted speed limit on Avenida Ximino is 25 miles per hour (mph).
The threshold for residential areas must comply with the following parameters:
Parameter 1: The measured 85th percentile speed of traffic shall be equal to or greater than 35 mph.
Parameter 2: 70% of the measured speeds shall be in excess of 25 mph.
Speed Survey Data Collection
The Engineering Department conducted a speed radar survey on the quarter mile roadway segment of Avenida Ximino between McCallum Way and Baristo Road within the following time period:
• September 16,2024, through September 23, 2024 (7 days) – Speed radar survey Traffic Calming Step 1: Speed Radar Survey– September 16,2024, through September 23, 2024 Speed Radar Survey Results:
1. Parameter 1 was not met with 85th percentile speed of traffic being 33 mph.
2. Parameter 2 was not met with an average of 68% of the measured speed being over the posted speed limit.
1 Summary Table:
Avenida Ximino – Between McCallum Way and Baristo Road
Location: Speed Limit: 25 MPH
Traffic
Calming
Step
Average
Speed
(MPH)
Percentage
of Speeders
(%)
85th Percentile Speed
Time Frame Device Measured (MPH)
9/16/2024 -
9/23/2024 Speed Radar 1 27 33 68
Recommendation
The Engineering Department recommends that the city maintain the current speed limit at 25 mph and not im traffic calming measures.
Arma
City E
, P.E.
• EXHIBIT A – SPEED SURVEY AVENIDA XIMINO – BETWEEN MCCALLUM WAY AND
BARISTO ROAD
2 For Project: Avenida Ximino between McCallum Way and Baristo Road Merged
Project Notes: Exhibit A – Speed Survey
Location/Name:
Report Generated:
Speed Intervals
Time Intervals
11/5/2024
1 MPH
Instant
9/16/2024
33 MPH
5517
10:19:56 AM
8:00:00 AM
on
Traffic Report From
85th Percentile Speed
85th Percentile Vehicles
Max Speed
through 9/23/2024
6:58:23 PM
10:59:59 AM
61 MPH
6491
9/21/2024
Total Vehicles
AADT: 911
Volumes -
weekly counts
Time 5 Day
872
59 7 Day
850
51 Average Daily
AM Peak 7:00 AM
PM Peak 5:00 PM 78 71
Speed
Speed Limit: 25
85th Percentile Speed:
50th Percentile Speed:
10 MPH Pace Interval:
Average Speed:
33 28
23.0 MPH
27.91 Monday
687
to 33.0 MPH
Tuesday
652
Wednesday
629
Thursday
667
Friday
666
Saturday
567
Sunday
Count over limit 530
% over limit
Avg Speeder
Avg Speed
64.1 69.6 68.5 68.8 66.5
31.1 27.9
65.2 73.0
31.1 31.0 30.9 30.8 31.0 30.9
27.4 28.2 28.0 28.0 27.6 28.5
Class Counts
Number %
VEH_SM 4 0.1
97.4 2.5
VEH_MED 6322
VEH_LG 165
[VEH_SM=motorcycle, VEH_MED = sedan, VEH_LG = truck]
MEMORANDUM
Date:
To:
December 16, 2024
Armando J. Garcia Baldizzone, P.E. City Engineer
From: Andres Perez, Assistant Engineer
Re: Avenida Del Yermo – Between McCallum Way and Vega Road Temporary Traffic Calming Study
This report presents the results of the traffic calming study completed in the City of Cathedral City, California, on Avenida Del Yermo between McCallum Way and Vega Road as requested by a Cathedral City Resident at 30988 Avenida Del Yermo.
Roadway Characteristics
Avenida Del Yermo is two-lane local (residential) street with parking on both sides that extends northsouth between 30th Avenue and Ramon Road. The posted speed limit on Avenida Del Yermo is 25 miles per hour (mph).
The parameters for the implementations of traffic calming devices in for residential areas is as follows:
Parameter 1: The measured 85th percentile speed of traffic shall be equal to or greater than 35 mph.
Parameter 2: 70% of the measured speeds shall be in excess of 25 mph.
Speed Survey Data Collection
The Engineering Department conducted a speed radar survey and speed feedback survey on the quarter mile roadway segment of Avenida Del Yermo between McCallum Way and Vega Road within the following periods of time:
•
•
October 07, 2024, through October 14, 2024 (7 days) - Speed Radar Survey October 25, 2024, through November 01, 2024 (7 days) - Speed Feedback Signs Survey This section presents the speed survey results conducted on Avenida Del Yermo during the specified period mentioned above.
Traffic Calming Step 1: Speed Radar Survey– October 07, through October 07, 2024 Speed Radar Survey Results:
1. Parameter 1 was met with the 85th percentile speed of traffic being 35 mph. 1 2. Parameter 2 was met with an average of 74% of the measured speed being over the posted speed limit.
With the 85th percentile speed recorded and percentage of speed violations greater than the allowable threshold for residential areas, staff proceeded to Step 2 of the traffic calming process.
Traffic Calming Step 2: Speed Feedback Signs – August 26, 2024, through September 08, 2024 Speed Feedback Sign Survey Results:
1. Parameter 1 was not met with the 85th percentile speed being 30 mph.
2. Parameter 2 was not met with an average 47% of the measured speed being over the posted speed limit.
The data obtained showed a reduction in speed that falls within the permissible limits of the 85th percentile speed and percentage of speed violations. Therefore, the street segment does not require additional temporary measures.
Summary Table:
Avenida Del Yermo – Between McCallum Way and Vega Road
Location: Speed Limit: 25 MPH
Traffic
Calming
Step
Average
Speed
(MPH)
Percentage
85th Percentile Speed of Speeders
Time Frame Device Measured (MPH) (%)
Speed
Radar
Speed
Feedback
Sign
1 2
10/07/24-10/14/24 29 35 74
10/25/24 - 11/01/24 24 30 47
Recommendation
The Engineering Department recommends that the City maintain the current speed limit at 25 mph and implement the following traffic calming measures:
1. Install flashing speed limit regulatory signs.
2. Installation of centerline pavement striping for local/residential roadways with speeds up to 40 mph per the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CD MUTCD) standards. The centerline striping shall extend from along Avenida Del Yermo between 30th Avenue and Ramon Road.
3. ment
Arman
City En
P.E.
•
•
EXHIBIT A – SPEED SURVEY: AVENIDA DEL YERMO BETWEEN MCCALLUM WAY AND
VEGA ROAD
EXHIBIT B – WEEKLY REPORT SPEED FEEDBACK SIGN: 2024-10-25 TO 2024-11-01 2 For Project: Avenida Del Yermo between McCallum Way and Vega Road Avenida Del Yermo between McCallum Way and Vega Road
Incoming
Exhibit A - Speed Radar
Project Notes:
Location/Name:
Report Generated:
Speed Intervals
Time Intervals
12/9/2024
1 MPH
Instant
10/7/2024
35 MPH
2428
3:43:19 PM
1:00:00 PM
on
Traffic Report From
85th Percentile Speed
85th Percentile Vehicles
Max Speed
through 10/14/2024
2:46:42 PM
11:59:59 PM
61 MPH
2856
10/10/2024
Total Vehicles
AADT: 382
Volumes -
weekly counts
Time 5 Day
390
47 7 Day
Average Daily
AM Peak
378
7:00 AM 39
PM Peak 4:00 PM 31 31
Speed
Speed Limit: 25
85th Percentile Speed:
50th Percentile Speed:
10 MPH Pace Interval:
Average Speed:
35 29
24.0 MPH
28.94 Monday
310
to 34.0 MPH
Tuesday
300
Wednesday
343
Thursday
320
Friday
344
Saturday
292
Sunday
Count over limit 219
% over limit
Avg Speeder
Avg Speed
76.0 73.5 72.4 76.0 77.1
31.6 29.3
74.7 71.1
31.5 31.2 31.4 31.7 31.6 31.7
29.0 28.6 28.6 29.2 29.0 28.9
Class Counts
Number %
VEH_SM 5 0.2
VEH_MED 2780 97.3
VEH_LG 71 2.5
[VEH_SM=motorcycle, VEH_MED = sedan, VEH_LG = truck]
Exhibit B - Speed Feedback Sign Custom Report
Location: North - Avenida del Yermo
Avenida del Yermo
25 mph
Report Period: 2024-10-25 to 2024-11-01
Address: Total Vehicle Count: 6705
Speed Limit:
Date/Time
2024-10-25
2024-10-26
2024-10-27
2024-10-28
2024-10-29
2024-10-30
2024-10-31
2024-11-01
Summary
% of Speed Violations Average Speed (mph) Max Speed (mph) 85% Speed (mph) 52 %
51 %
H 25
H 25
48 44
H 31
H 31
53 % H 25 46 H 31
52 % H 25 H 52
42 H 31
51 % H 25 30
49 % 24 50 30
H 54 %
52 %
H 25 45 H 31
H 25 46 30
AVG: 52 % AVG: 25 mph AVG: 31 mph
H - highest value in the column, bolded H is highest H value in report ** "n/a" - means the sign did not collect any data at the time stipulated in the report. "n/a" values are NOT included in calculations.
Generated on December 16, 2024 at 5:01 PM SafePace Cloud powered by Web Director® Exhibit B - Speed Feedback Sign Custom Report
Location: South - Avenida del Yermo
Avenida del Yermo
25 mph
Report Period: 2024-10-25 to 2024-11-01
Address: Total Vehicle Count: 2364
Speed Limit:
Date/Time
2024-10-25
2024-10-26
2024-10-27
2024-10-28
2024-10-29
2024-10-30
2024-10-31
2024-11-01
Summary
% of Speed Violations Average Speed (mph) Max Speed (mph) 85% Speed (mph) H 46 % H 29
43 %
23 35
23 35 H 29
38 % 22 35 H 29
38 % 23 35 H 29
43 % 23
22 37 H 29
40 % 35 H 29
40 % 23 H 42
37 H 29
44 % H 24 H 29
AVG: 42 % AVG: 23 mph AVG: 29 mph
H - highest value in the column, bolded H is highest H value in report ** "n/a" - means the sign did not collect any data at the time stipulated in the report. "n/a" values are NOT included in calculations.
Generated on December 16, 2024 at 5:00 PM SafePace Cloud powered by Web Director® Staff Report
City Council
Item No. 3.C
Meeting Date: December 11, 2024
From: Kevin Biersack, Financial Services Director
Title: Facilities Master Plan Update
RECOMMENDATION:
This agenda item is for review and discussion only.
BACKGROUND:
On January 22, 2022, the City Council held a Planning and Goal Setting Workshop to establish the City’s 2022 priorities.
On February 16, 2022, the City Council adopted Resolution 2022-09, to memorialize the priorities discussed in the goal setting session. As it relates to the Facilities Department, the priority was to develop and adopt a Facilities Master Plan.
On October 12, 2022, the City Council approved a contract with MAAS Companies to complete Phase I of the Facilities Master Plan.
On February 22, 2023, the City Council approved a budget amendment to complete the Facilities Master Plan, Phase I during FY 2022/2023.
On July 12, 2023, MAAS Companies delivered the Facilities Condition Assessment and the Facilities Maintenance Report.
On August 9, 2023, MAAS Companies delivered the Facilities Master Plan, Phase I Final Report – attached to the report.
On February 28, 2024, the City Council received an update on the Facilities Master Plan, Phase I Report. The Facilities team was in the process of determining which items can be accomplished with current staff and budget, which items require third-party vendors within existing budget, and which items require third-party vendors in future budget.
A Cathedral City boundary map with City facilities identified is attached. The facility assets listed below are identified in the Facilities Master Plan, Phase I Report:
Within the Facilities Condition Assessment used for the report, thirty (30) work items were defined totaling $3,271,066 in deferred maintenance costs:
The Facilities Master Plan, Phase I also identified staff additions. These labor categories are now in the City’s salary schedule:
Maintenance Technician I
Maintenance Technician II
The City hired a Maintenance Technician I on September 9 and a second Maintenance Technician I is currently in the background process.
DISCUSSION:
The Facilities Master Plan, Phase I Report identifies thirty (30) work items for the City to address. The following is the status of each item. Completed items have the actual cost.
Existing budget and future budget items show the estimated cost.
TOWN SQUARE – FOUNTAIN OF LIFE
PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING
PARKING STRUCTURE
CITY HALL BELL TOWER
LIBRARY
FS413 & COMMERCIAL BUILDING
FIRE ADMIN 410
PANORAMA PARK RESTROOMS & STORAGE
FS 412
CIVIC CENTER
SUMMARY
Status of the thirty (30) items in the Facilities Condition Assessment used for the report:
Costs of the thirty (30) items in the Facilities Condition Assessment used for the report:
Total costs:
The original estimate in the Facilities Maintenance Plan for these work items totaled $3,271,066 in the Facilities Condition Assessment. Currently, the estimated costs for the facilities maintenance plan, including actuals and anticipated costs, are $3,252,146.
The current budget will be used for approximately $52,554 of costs. Future budget, whether in the upcoming FY26 and FY27 biennial budget or thereafter, will total approximately $2,975,595, with $2,621,870 from Fund 614 and the remainder from Fund 100.
FISCAL IMPACT:
No Fiscal Impact at this time.
FIVE-YEAR STRATEGIC PLAN:
GOAL B: COMMUNITY INVESTMENT
Objective: Cathedral City roads, gateways, public spaces and other city infrastructure are well planned, designed, constructed, and maintained.
Action B-14: Develop and adopt a Facilities Master Plan ATTACHMENTS:
1. Cathedral City Facilities Master Plan 8-9-23
2. Cathedral City Government Facilities Map
Facilities Master Plan, Phase I
August 9, 2023
Cathedral City
MAAS Companies, Inc.
18575 Jamboree Rd.
Suite 600
Irvine, CA 92612
Executive Summary 1
Mission, Objectives and Background
Facilities Mission 2
Facilities Master Plan Goals and Objectives 2
Background 3
Facilities Scope of Responsibilities
Overview 4
Current Organizational Structure 4
Facilities Condition Assessment – Ten-Year Budget Forecast Facilities Condition Assessment 5
Assessment Process 5
Data Collection 5
Deficiency Repairs/Replacements (Work Items) 6
Ten-Year Budget Forecast 7
Preventative Maintenance Program 8
Best Practices and Recommendations
Efficient Building Operations 9
Vendors 11
Staffing 12
Facilities Team Training 14
Business Continuity Plan 16
Work Planning and Control 18
Next Steps
Phase I 19
Phase II 19
Acknowledgments 20
Appendix 21
Appendix A: Facilities Condition Assessment
Appendix B: Preventative Maintenance Report
TABLE OF CONTENTS
MAAS Companies, Inc. 1
In the Fall of 2022, the City Council for Cathedral City initiated the process to develop a Five-Year Strategic
Plan. In order to uphold their commitment to efficiently and effectively maintain and operate the City’s facilities, a request was made to create a Facilities Master Plan for inclusion in this strategic planning document.
The MAAS Companies were contracted in October
2022 to undertake Phase I of developing the Cathedral
City Facilities Master Plan.
The Facilities Master Plan serves as a roadmap for the
Facilities Team, guiding them in their efforts to proactively address maintenance needs, optimize resources, and minimize downtime. By implementing a structured
and systematic approach to facility maintenance, Cathedral City aims to enhance the longevity of its assets, reduce operational costs, and provide a safe and comfortable environment for all who work and use
these facilities.
The Facilities Master Plan provides details that include a Facilities Condition Assessment & Ten-Year Budget
Forecast and a Preventative Maintenance Program.
These reports provide detailed information on systems,
building components and parking garage structural review of all city-owned assets and the current conditions. The Preventative Maintenance Program provides detailed recommendations to maintain specific building systems and components for each of the eighteen locations assessed. Additionally, a ten-year cost analysis is provided to forecast costs for:
§ Replacing building components/systems at the end of
their useful life
§ Annual Preventative maintenance costs
§ Cost for thirty (30) identified critical maintenance
repairs that have been identified during the assessment process
The Master Plan also makes recommendations based
on industry Best Practices to assist the Facilities Team with achieving its maintenance objectives and fostering a culture of excellence in facilities management.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Executive Summary
1 MAAS Companies, Inc. 2
— FACILITIES MISSION —
To ensure the optimal performance, longevity, and
safety of Cathedral City physical assets.
Using these elements, the Facilities Master Plan has established long-term objectives and strategies for managing the Cathedral city-owned facilities.
1. Reliability and Availability: Improve the reliability and availability of critical systems and assets by
implementing robust maintenance processes,
predictive maintenance techniques, and appropriate backup plans. Minimize unplanned downtime and interruptions to business operations.
2. Lifecycle Planning: Develop a comprehensive understanding of the lifecycle of assets and plan for their eventual replacement or major renovation.
Implement strategies for asset renewal, including
budgeting, scheduling, and project management.
3. Data-Driven Decision Making: Establish data collection and analysis processes to support evidence-based decision making in facilities operations. Utilize technology, such as computerized maintenance management systems (CMMS), to
track and analyze asset performance, maintenance history, and cost data.
4. Continuous Improvement: Foster a culture of continuous improvement by regularly evaluating maintenance practices, seeking feedback from stakeholders, and implementing lessons learned.
5. Risk Management: Identify and mitigate risks associated with maintenance activities, including potential hazards, equipment failures, and service
disruptions. Develop contingency plans and emergency response protocols to minimize the impact of unforeseen events.
6. Compliance and Safety: Establish and maintain
compliance with relevant regulations, codes, and
standards to ensure the safety and well-being of
facilities staff, building occupants and users of the
facilities. This includes conducting regular safety
inspections, addressing identified risks, and maintaining necessary documentation. Implement a robust safety training program for all facilities staff.
These goals provide a framework for addressing the Cathedral City Facility’s needs, promote efficiency, ensure compliance, and support the long-term sustainability of the physical assets owned by Cathedral City.
Facilities Master Plan Goals and Objectives
Guiding Principles for the Cathedral City Five-Year Strategic Plan 2023 include the following elements:
MISSION, OBJECTIVES AND BACKGROUND
MISSION
Our purpose and how
we strive to serve our
community.
VISION
A compelling verbal
image which forms a
mental picture of our
desired future. It defines
what we seek to
become and provides
organizational
direction and
focus.
GOALS
Identifies high priority
initiatives and key areas
of focus to achieve our
Vision and Mission.
ACTIONS
Identifies specific activities, projects, and services to be performed.
MAAS Companies, Inc. 3
Background
MAAS Companies was engaged to create the Facilities Master Plan, Phase I for Cathedral City. We were tasked to evaluate the current environment and provide a strategic roadmap to align the Facilities Department with industry best practices and standards. Our strategy included one-on-one meetings with Facilities staff and department leadership to identify current practices, areas of concerns, and best practices that will work best for Cathedral City. We engaged a consultant to perform a Facilities Condition Assessment for eighteen (18) city-owned facilities, identify current conditions, make recommendations for future repairs and replacement, and identified thirty (30) critical repairs. A Preventative Maintenance Program was also developed for each of the eighteen (18) locations based on the specific systems and building components for each location. The annual expenses for the program have been provided. Lastly all data collected is available using the Paragon Software that the city can use for budget forecasting; update asset data as components are replaced; and monitor the conditions and anticipate upcoming end of life replacements. Five Cathedral City staff have been trained to use the resource.
MISSION, OBJECTIVES AND BACKGROUND
IN-PERSON MEETINGS (15)
DATA COLLECTION SOFTWARE
FACILITIES TOURS
FACILITIES ASSESSMENT (18)
Implementing
Best Practices
10-Year Cost Projections
for renewal and
replacement for each
location
Facilities Condition
Assessment Plan
for all systems and
building components
Preventative
Maintenance
Program and cost
for implementation
MAAS Companies, Inc. 4
Facilities Scope of Responsibilities
Overview
The responsibility of Facilities encompasses the management and technical operations of all city-owned buildings, grounds, outdoor lighting, utilities, and other designated facilities according to the city’s specifications. Moreover, the team is entrusted with the task of strategizing, coordinating, executing, and overseeing maintenance activities to ensure their efficiency and effectiveness, as detailed below:
POSITION DUTIES
General Maintenance General maintenance and repairs for interior and exterior spaces for city-owned buildings.
Mechanical Systems Manages the systems and distribution for all building mechanical systems. Works with an outside vendors as well as for service, repairs and preventative maintenance work.
Utility Operations Oversees the utility points of connections for city-owned buildings. This includes water/ sewer, natural gas, solar and electricity.
Minor Renovations Oversees minor renovations for interior spaces.
Moves/Set-Up Services Provides moves, set-up services for public events.
Safety and Compliance Manages the fire/life safety systems including electronic door access in city-owned buildings.
Preventative Maintenance Performs preventative maintenance tasks for building systems and equipment.
Custodial Services Oversees outside service provider for cleaning and sanitization of the Civic center, FS Admin, and Amphitheater.
Landscape Services Oversees outside services provides for landscape and trash removal for the Civic Center.
Current Organizational Structure
FACILITIES SCOPE OF RESPONSIBILITIES
Director of Finance
Facilities Manager
Vendor Facilities Maintenance Worker II
Assistant Maintenance Supervisor
MAAS Companies, Inc. 5
Facilities Condition Assessment
FACILITIES ASSESSMENT – TEN-YEAR BUDGET FORECAST
A Facilities Condition Assessment (FCA) is a thorough evaluation of the physical state and operational effectiveness of all buildings owned by the city. This assessment involves a comprehensive assessment of data and observations, followed by the reporting of findings. A team of assessment experts performs a review to determine the overall health and condition of the buildings. By collecting and analyzing data, the assessment provides a clear understanding of the conditions, enabling efficient resource allocation to maintain optimal functioning and compliance of the buildings. The Facilities Condition Assessment plays a crucial role in the Facilities Master Plan, serving as a roadmap to identify the needs and potential issues of the physical assets and their systems. It forecasts resource allocation for the next ten years.
Assessment Process
MAAS Companies has enlisted the services of Terracon, a reputable industry consultant, to conduct a comprehensive Facilities Condition Assessment for a total of eighteen (18) city-owned buildings and locations. Terracon specializes in providing assessments for municipalities, educational facilities, and private industries. The scope of the assessment involved a thorough examination of the physical conditions, utilizing relevant maintenance records, construction drawings, and equipment manuals. The assessment was conducted on May 15 – 18, and June 2, 2023, and the following components were reviewed:
§ Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing (MEP) review for all building components. § Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning (HVAC)
§ Parking Garage Structural
§ Roofing
§ Exterior Hardscape
§ Fire Protection Systems
§ Doors and Stairways
§ Elevators
§ Immediate or Emergency Repairs Observed
Data Collection
During the assessment process, data collection was conducted using the Paragon software program. To ensure data accuracy, both field personnel and facilities engineering staff at Terracon analyzed the data before finalizing it in Paragon. The data was categorized based on Asset Summary, such as City Hall, Library, etc., and further detailed by each Inventory Component, including water heaters, boilers, foundations, etc.
The comprehensive report can be found in Appendix A of this report.
The Paragon software serves as a database that provides comprehensive overview of the status of Cathedral City’s building assets. Five Cathedral City staff members have received training in utilizing the software and keeping the information up to date. Regular data updates and adjustments are crucial to reflect changing conditions, equipment replacements, and cost information. This ensures accurate forecasting for future expenditures.
MAAS Companies, Inc. 6
In Cathedral City’s data analytics, the industry-standard Facilities Condition Index (FCI) is employed. The FCI is a benchmark used to assess the relative physical condition of a facility, categorizing them as Good, Fair, or Poor. The overall ratings for all facilities indicate a Good condition. This rating signifies that the Cathedral City Facilities Team has effectively fulfilled their responsibilities and the current conditions indicate well-maintained buildings. The FCA report in Appendix A provides specific rankings for each asset and a more in-depth description of the FCI description.
BUILDING ASSETS CATHEDRAL CITY RANKINGS
Thirteen Assets Good (Range 0 – 2.9%)
Four Assets Fair (Range 5.3% - 9.7%)
One Asset (Fountain of Life) Poor (16.7%)
FCI Ranking Index
Good 0 < 5%
Fair 5.01% < 10%
Poor 10.01% <
Deficiency Repairs/Replacements (Work Items)
During the Assessment process, field assessors diligently reported any repairs or safety conditions that required immediate attention and exceeded $1,500 in repair cost. A total of thirty (30) such items were identified by the team. Each Work Item has a detailed report and cost estimate in the FCA report, Appendix A. The total repairs for work items are estimated to be $3,271,066 with most of these expenses related to repairs in the City Hall Parking Structure totaling $2,508,237.
FACILITIES ASSESSMENT – TEN-YEAR BUDGET FORECAST
MAAS Companies, Inc. 6
MAAS Companies, Inc. 7
Ten-Year Budget Forecast
FACILITIES ASSESSMENT – TEN-YEAR BUDGET FORECAST
The concluding step of the Facilities Condition Assessment involves analyzing the costs associated with Capital Renewal Projects, Work Items, and Preventative Maintenance. Each building component has undergone a thorough review and received a rating to determine current status and potential replacement timeframe. This assessment considers factors such as component age, typical lifespan, and field observations. The estimated Remaining Services Life (RSL) for each component has been determined, along with the replacement cost (fully burdened), year of estimated replacement, and cost escalation factor of five (5) percent per year.
Work Items, which encompass critical repairs, have also been incorporated into the Ten-Year Forecast. Due to the urgency, all expenses related to Work Items have been estimated to occur in year one. Additionally, the forecast includes the cost of implementing a comprehensive Preventative Maintenance Program. For further details on the Preventative Maintenance Program, please refer to Appendix B.
The Facilities Condition Assessment report, available in Appendix A, provides a comprehensive overview of these expenses. Furthermore, these costs are accessible in the Paragon software. Here is a summary of the overall costs as detailed in the Facilities Condition Assessment report.
Source: Terracon Facilities Condition Assessment, July 2023 CATEGORY 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 GRAND
TOTAL
Capital
Renewal
$4,890 $0 $0 $93,127 $0 $391,004 $0 $1,600,005 $2,127,322 $8,720 $4,225,069 Work Item $3,271,066 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,271,066 Preventative
Maintenance
$228,477 $239,901 $251,896 $264,491 $277,716 $291,601 $306,182 $321,491 $337,565 $354,443 $2,873,764 Grand Total $3,504,433 $239,901 $251,896 $357,619 $277,716 $682,606 $306,182 $1,921,496 $2,464,887 $363,163 $10,369,898 MAAS Companies, Inc. 8
Preventative Maintenance Program
A Preventative Maintenance program is a systematic process to maintain and preserve the functionality and condition of equipment, assets, and overall facilities. It involves regular inspections, servicing, and repairs to prevent potential failures, optimize performance and extend the lifespan of assets.
In collaboration with the Facilities Condition Assessment and the identification of all building components, Terracon has been commissioned to develop a comprehensive Preventative Maintenance Program for Cathedral City. Following industry standards and manufacture guidelines, each component has been categorized, and a task list with corresponding frequencies to perform these tasks has been established.
Furthermore, the associated costs for these tasks and an annual budget to implement the Preventative Maintenance Program have been formulated. The estimated annual cost is approximately $200,000, which is subject to increase as equipment ages and costs rise. Additionally, the Preventative Maintenance Program in Appendix B includes recommendations regarding staff members and required skill sets needed to perform these tasks effectively.
It is important to acknowledge that the Facilities team and the vendors hired by the city have been conducting various preventative maintenance tasks to uphold equipment functionality. However, the absence of a work order system to initiate and track PM tasks or the lack of specific vendor agreements specifying the frequency and nature of preventative maintenance work conducted, does not meet the standard for preventative care.
Implementing the Preventative Maintenance Program is highly recommended to mitigate costs associated with equipment failures and premature replacements resulting from inadequate maintenance practices.
PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM
THE BENEFITS OF
PREVENTATIVE
MAINTENANCE Saves Money
§ Prevents costly repairs
§ Saves in utility costs
§ Reduces operating costs
Keeps Employees
Happy, Comfortable
§ Supports healthy,
productive and safe
environments
§ Helps avoid costly
work disruption
§ Addresses issues
before they
become urgent
More Maintenance,
Less Repairs
§ Increases equipment life-span
§ Reduces risk of catastrophic failure
§ Reduces need for costly
emergency repairs
Saves Energy,
Improves Performance
§ Maximizes efficiency
§ Improves system reliability
§ Reduces energy use
and expense
MAAS Companies, Inc. 9
Efficient Building Operations
Best Practice – Establish daily practices to optimize building performance, appearance, and overall functionality of facilities.
To ensure efficient building operations, a variety
of tasks must be regularly conducted, such as
inspections, preventative
maintenance, waste management, cleaning, safety
and security measures,
and effective communication with building stakeholders. By establishing a formalized process and
dedicating sufficient time
to consistently perform
these tasks, facilities operations can achieve cost
reductions and enhance
stakeholder satisfaction.
The philosophy behind efficient building operations
is to create a maintenance
program that strives to
achieve these concepts:
Current Observations
The Facilities team is currently taking steps to establish a formal daily inspection process. Until now, the team has been conducting regular visual inspections of buildings whenever time allows. However, due to the lack of a structured procedure, there is a lack of accountability in addressing identified deficiencies, as well as an insufficient number of staff to conduct these tasks. Consequently, these inspections are cursory at best.
Noteworthy repairs and conditions may persist due to other tasks taking precedence or temporary fixes being implemented until funding becomes available to address more significant issues. It is understandable that there are competing demands for funding resources. Nevertheless, by implementing a formalized process and consistently documenting the ongoing conditions, City Leadership will have the opportunity to gain a comprehensive understanding of the overall situation and allocate resources accordingly.
BEST PRACTICES AND RECOMMENDATIONS
REPAIRS
MANAGEMENT
SAFETY
• Implement Preventative Maintenance Program
• Prevent Unscheduled Shut-down
• Perform Routine Maintenance Tasks
• Track Work Requests Using CMMS
• Manage Vendor Contracts for Compliance and Costs
• Track Capital Renewal Projects and
Forecast Future Expenses
• Communication with Stakeholders and
Leadership
• Provide Staff Safety and Development Training
• Inspect Facilities Conditions Routinely
• Implement Emergency Preparedness
Plan and Training
• Provide proper tools and PPE for staff
MAAS Companies, Inc. 10
Recommendations
Maintaining the overall functionality and appearance of the city-owned facilities it is recommended that a formalized daily maintenance program be developed. Here are some best practices to consider when creating a program:
§ Create a Checklist: Develop a comprehensive checklist with essential daily tasks to be performed. § Inspect the Buildings: Begin each day by conducting a thorough inspection looking for any signs of damage, malfunctioning equipment, leaks, or potential safety hazards. § Clean and Sanitize: Regular cleaning is essential for maintaining a healthy and presentable environment. This includes managing waste receptacles both inside and outside. § Check HVAC Systems: Check for proper functioning systems and monitor temperature and humidity levels.
Ensure that filters are clean and changed on a regular basis. § Test Safety Systems: Ensure that all safety systems, such as fire alarms, sprinkler systems, emergency exits, generators and lighting are functioning correctly. Test these systems regularly to ensure they are in good working condition.
§ Minor Repairs: Address minor repairs promptly to prevent them from turning into a larger issue. § Maintain Equipment/Preventative Maintenance: Check maintain equipment to prevent breakdowns or accidents. Perform all preventative maintenance tasks according to the schedule for each piece of equipment. § Work Orders: Review Work Order status daily to ensure that tasks are completed in a timely manner. § Maintain Documentation: Keep accurate records on maintenance activities, repairs, inspections, and warranty work.
BEST PRACTICES AND RECOMMENDATIONS
MAAS Companies, Inc. 10
MAAS Companies, Inc. 11
Vendors
Best Practice - To select the most suitable vendor for the services you require, follow a well-defined selection process, establish minimum qualifications, and communicate clear expectations.
Cathedral City uses a hybrid maintenance model for facilities maintenance that combines both in-house staff and external vendor support to effectively manage maintenance activities. It aims to leverage the strengths of each approach while optimizing cost efficiency and service quality.
Current Observations
Currently the Facilities Team works with approximately fourteen (14) vendors to provide services in these areas:
§ Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning (HVAC)
§ Fire Alarm, Fire Sprinklers, and Fire Extinguishers
§ Elevator Maintenance and Inspections
§ Roll-up Doors, Gates, and Electronic Door Access
§ Fountain Maintenance
§ Cooling Towers
§ Grounds Maintenance
§ Custodial Services
Many of these vendors have a longstanding history of providing services to the city. However, there are only a few current agreements on file. Additionally, there is no defined Preventative Maintenance standard documented for staff to verify if the work is being completed to their satisfaction.
The recent change in Facilities Managers has highlighted the need to review services and reset expectations.
Recommendations
With the absence of formalized agreements and
the implementation of the new Preventative Maintenance Program, this is an ideal time to solicit proposals from vendors to perform the work using
the new standards. Also, by soliciting bids, this will
ensure that the city is getting the best price for
the services.
The city has a defined process for soliciting proposals and includes the critical steps to select the most qualified vendor. However, when soliciting
proposals for maintenance vendors consider adding these concepts to the process:
§ Scope of Work – Clearly define the scope of work.
Specify the tasks, timelines, deliverables using
the current Facilities Condition Assessment and
Preventative Maintenance Program. State your
expectations as clear and concise as possible.
Define the performance standards, timelines, and
deliverables.
Lastly, it is crucial to closely monitor the vendors
to ensure that the work is being executed according to city standards. This involves actively overseeing the progress of the maintenance tasks and verifying that the invoices correspond to the actual work performed. By implementing this monitoring process, expectations are met, and billing can easily be verified.
BEST PRACTICES AND RECOMMENDATIONS
MAAS Companies, Inc. 12
Staffing
Best Practice – Effectively hire, train, and manage facilities maintenance staff to ensure that buildings and equipment are properly maintained.
The current staffing model for Facilities uses the Hybrid Model which includes in-house staff and outsourced vendors for maintenance operations. The grounds and custodial operations are fully outsourced. The in-house staff perform routine maintenance tasks for all city-owned locations and on average complete approximately 40 work orders per week depending on the level of repair and complexity. Most of the preventative maintenance work and emergency repairs are outsourced.
There are several key factors to consider in the current staffing model. First, are there enough staff to perform the tasks necessary to have well-maintained facilities; second, is the budget available to support additional staff or a change in the overall staffing model; and lastly, is the staff available to monitor the vendor repairs and preventative maintenance work they are contracted to perform. In consideration of these factors the following is a summary of current practices that should be addressed to improve facility conditions and ensure maintenance tasks are performed timely, safely, effectively, and efficiently.
Current Observations
The Facilities team demonstrates a collaborative and cohesive approach to the work. They communicate well and have a shared commitment to performing their duties to maintain the facilities at a high level.
There are clear roles of responsibility which are summarized in the chart below.
POSITION DUTIES
Facilities Manager Responsible for the administrative and technical work in the management of the City’s facilities functions.
Assistant Facilities Maintenance
Supervisor
Assist in supervising, coordinating, and performing a variety of maintenance activities for City buildings.
Facilities Maintenance Worker II Performs semi-skilled facilities maintenance and repair work.
The current staffing level requires the Facilities Team to use a reactive maintenance strategy rather than a proactive strategy. Reactive maintenance can be more expensive than proactive maintenance because repairs and replacements may be more extensive or require more resources. Additionally, this approach can shorten the lifespan of equipment; pose safety risks to staff or occupants; and can create low staff morale due to the unpredictability of the work.
As the city-owned facilities continue to age, additional time needs to be spent inspecting facilities daily and making repairs and reporting observations for larger repairs/upgrades to the facilities. Additionally, inhouse staff should be performing basic preventative maintenance tasks as outlined in the Preventative Maintenance Program. Contracting vendors for these smaller repetitive tasks may become cost prohibitive. Performing these duties in-house also gives the staff more knowledge and awareness of potential issues including equipment and system failures. It is also our observation that there is limited vendor oversight due to limited staff to initiate and track preventative maintenance work performed by vendors.
BEST PRACTICES AND RECOMMENDATIONS
MAAS Companies, Inc. 13
Recommendations
To improve operational efficiency, it is recommended that staff levels be increased. Key reasons for adding additional staff will provide timely in-house response for preventative maintenance tasks, vendor oversight, implementation of daily building inspections and repairs for aging equipment and infrastructure for all city-owned buildings before reaching the failure point. Additional staff will also ensure that there are enough staff members on duty to respond to emergencies, shift coverage, and fairly distribute the growing workload. Having a staff that is flexible with diversified skills provides opportunities for the team and management to respond to issues in a timely manner and perform repairs quickly.
The following should be considered for increasing the number of staff:
§ Add one Facilities Maintenance Worker I to perform building inspections and basic repairs. § Add one Facilities Maintenance Worker II to perform preventative maintenance and basic repairs for all HVAC systems.
§ A review of the current staff’s technical skills should be evaluated before hiring additional staff to identify the skills required for new hires.
Lastly, performance metrics for staff should be developed to evaluate the effectiveness of a larger workforce and ensure that the goals of management and the Cathedral City Strategic Plan are being met. Below are metrics to consider for the Facilities Team:
POSITION DESCRIPTION
Response Time Time it takes to respond and resolve a reported service request.
Equipment Downtime Monitor and reducing equipment downtime due to PM or repairs.
Preventative Maintenance
Compliance
Track the scheduled maintenance tasks and the percentage of tasks completed.
Work Order Completion Rate Measure the percentage or work orders that are successfully completed with a specific time (i.e., Daily, weekly).
Safety Incidents Track accidents, injuries, near-misses to assess the effectiveness of safety protocols or lack thereof.
Cost Control Manage the team’s ability to adhere to the budget, implement cost savings initiatives and overall fiscal performance.
Training and Certification Measure staff commitment to personal and technical development related to industry standards.
Customer Satisfaction Measures the team’s ability meet user expectations and deliver a satisfactory level of service.
BEST PRACTICES AND RECOMMENDATIONS
MAAS Companies, Inc. 14
Facilities Team Training
Best Practice – Implement a comprehensive staff training program to include structured training opportunities, foster professional development, and align the team with best practices in the industry.
Facilities maintenance organizations adhere to industry best practices by prioritizing continuous staff training and development to enhance job performance. An effective training program ensures a comprehensive grasp of workplace safety and compliance. It also fosters the upkeep of essential skills, ultimately bolstering workplace safety and safeguarding employees against potential hazards while performing their duties. It is important for training to be ongoing and customized to address the requirements and risks associated with the city facilities. By prioritizing the safety and well-being of staff, improving skill sets for efficient facility maintenance, and retaining valuable employees, the organization reaps substantial benefits.
Current Observations
At present, there is a lack of a formal and comprehensive workplace safety and skill-building training program for the Facilities staff. Despite an annual budget allocation of $1,500 for these three staff members, no specific training plan has been implemented. The absence of a defined training program highlights the significant level of risk associated with the lack of a safety culture in the department. It is crucial to address this issue and prioritize the development of a robust training program to ensure the safety and well-being of the staff.
BEST PRACTICES AND RECOMMENDATIONS
MAAS Companies, Inc. 14
MAAS Companies, Inc. 15
Recommendations
It is important to review the contracts for Landscape/Grounds and Custodial service providers to assess the level of safety training provided to these individuals who are responsible for servicing city-owned locations. By implementing this training, the city can ensure that all staff members, including vendors, receive adequate safety training to perform their tasks in a secure and responsible manner.
It is recommended to consider and implement the following training classes for the Facilities staff:
CLASS TRAINING PLAN REQUIRED STAFF FREQUENCY
Occupational
Safety and Health
Administration
(OSHA) 30
Hazard Communication,
Fall Protection, Electrical
Safety, PPE, Materials
Handling & Storage
Maintenance,
Grounds, Custodial
Three-Year
Certification
Bloodborne
Pathogens
Prevent Exposure,
Clean-up and Disposal of
Contaminates
Maintenance,
Grounds, Custodial
Biennial
Fire Safety Fire Extinguisher,
Evacuation, Prevention
Maintenance,
Grounds, Custodial
Annually
Technical Skills HVAC, Plumbing, Carpentry Maintenance Biennial or as new equipment/systems
are installed
Lockout/Tagout Isolating Equipment from
Energy Source
Maintenance Annually
Confined Spaces Identify Hazards and
Safety Procedures in
Confined Spaces
Maintenance Biennial
Computer Skills Computerized Maintenance
Management System
(CMMS)
Maintenance As needed for new
staff or new systems
Communication
and Customer
Service
Team Communication and
Customer Interaction.
Maintenance Biennial
Participate in Industry Associations such as International Facility Management Association (IFMA) and Cal/OSHA.
BEST PRACTICES AND RECOMMENDATIONS
MAAS Companies, Inc. 16
Business Continuity Plan
Best Practice – Ensure the continuous operation of maintenance services during disruptive events such as natural disasters, equipment failure, or other emergencies.
Having a Business Continuity Plan in place is crucial to minimize the impact of disruptive events on business operations. By implementing a plan, staff can swiftly respond to emergencies, mitigate risks, and minimize downtime. The primary objective is to resume critical functions and services, thereby reducing financial losses and minimizing the impact on the community.
During an emergency, the Facilities department plays a vital role. They are responsible for identifying the essential maintenance functions that must be prioritized to ensure the continuous operation of city facilities. This includes determining the critical equipment, systems, developing backup plans and alternative resources to quickly restore services. Facilities should have a well-prepared plan to address the specific responsibilities they have in an emergency and be ready to carry out this plan through training and educating the Facilities staff.
An overall Business Continuity Plan for all City operations is essential for safeguarding the services provided. It ensures operational resilience and minimizes the impact of disruptive events. The plan provides a structured framework that empowers staff at all levels to effectively implement and respond to the needs of the community.
Current Observations
At present, a viable Business Continuity Plan has not been developed for City operations. Although the Facilities department possesses information regarding past emergencies, vendor contacts and back-up service strategies, this data has not been formally documented or reviewed by City leadership.
BEST PRACTICES AND RECOMMENDATIONS
MAAS Companies, Inc. 16
MAAS Companies, Inc. 17
Recommendations
To ensure continuous operations of city-owned facilities, the Facilities Team should develop a plan to include these key factors:
KEY FACTOR DESCRIPTION
Risk Assessment Identify potential risks and threats that can impact maintenance operations.
This may include power outages, severe weather or seismic events, supply chain disruptions, or staff and/or vendor unavailability.
Emergency Response TeamDefine roles and responsibilities for each team member during the event and ensure there is a clear chain of command.
Communication Plan Develop a complete contact list for staff, vendors, suppliers, leadership and relevant stakeholders. Use multiple communications channels such as phone, email, and text messaging to make contact.
Critical Functions Identify and prioritize critical maintenance functions to ensure continuous operation of facilities. Develop back-up plans for alternative resources.
Alternative Facilities Identify backup facilities or locations where maintenance operations can relocate to if the primary location is inaccessible.
Equipment and SuppliesMaintain an inventory of essential equipment, tools, supplies and PPE. Establish agreements with local suppliers to ensure a steady supply chain.
Training Conduct annual training sessions with Facilities staff on emergency response, evacuation plans, equipment shutdown protocols, and other relevant safety measures.
Communication and
Customer Service
Team Communication and Customer Interaction.
BEST PRACTICES AND RECOMMENDATIONS
MAAS Companies, Inc. 18
Work Planning and Control
BEST PRACTICES AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Best Practice – Develop a work plan to optimize maintenance efforts, minimize downtime, reduce cost and ensure safe operations using a robust data management tool.
Work Planning is the process of organizing and scheduling tasks and activities to ensure that maintenance is carried out efficiently and effectively. It involves creating a comprehensive plan that outlines the maintenance tasks, priorities, resources needed and the timeline for completing work. Also, developing an annual report to summarize the work completed and to share future planning goals with city leaders is important for achieving future work planning goals.
Work Planning Control can be achieved by using a Computerized Maintenance Management System (CMMS) or work order system to efficiently track and manage all work request, scheduling and performing preventative maintenance tasks, reporting and analytics for work performed, and resource allocation for each work order. This tool should have the capability to be used in the field so that Facilities staff can be advised of requests and respond in a timely manner. A CMMS systems is also a front facing tool for customers and stakeholders to use to initiate work requests.
Current Observation
Currently, work orders are being submitted to the Facilities Manager via email. This method unfortunately has no scheduling or tracking capabilities and work is managed manually. However, the city is implementing a work order system using Tyler Technologies Enterprise Asset Management Software. MAAS Companies, Inc. has not been asked to be a consultant on this system development or implementation.
Recommendations
The first step for developing a strategic working plan for Facilities Services is the development of the Facilities Master Plan. The reports and best practice recommendations contained in the Facilities Master Plan help identify the work that needs to be performed and the frequency which it should be performed.
Creating monthly work planning documents will focus the Facilities team and provide a plan to better meet their goals.
A Work Plan should include the following elements:
Ensure
Regulatory
Compliance and
Documentation
Develop Metrics
Review and
Update Asset
Data Base
(Paragon)
Work Order
Assignments
and Tracking
Managing
Inventory for
Parts and
Supplies
Schedule
Preventative
Maintenance
Review Goals
with Staff
Annual
Reporting
MAAS Companies, Inc. 19
Phase I
Phase I of the Cathedral City Facilities Master Plan
concentrated on collecting data to evaluate the
state of buildings owned by the city. This resulted
in the creation of a Ten-year Budget Forecast for
Capital Renewal Projects, identification of Deferred
Maintenance issues and the establishment of a
Preventative Maintenance Program.
The main lesson learned from Phase I is the importance of consistently maintaining the assessment data using the Paragon software. By doing so, a
comprehensive overview of all Facilities’ requirements can be accessed for future reference. This tool proves to be highly valuable and can be easily
managed by city staff, minimizing the need for future investments in Facilities Condition Assessments and cost estimates.
Furthermore, the existing Facilities practices underwent a thorough examination, and recommendations were provided to align the department more effectively with industry best practices and standards. Implementing these recommendations will contribute to the development of a more robust department.
Phase II
The next phase of the Facilities Master Plan will prioritize the establishment and management of policies and procedures by the Facilities Department.
This phase will encompass various aspects such as:
§ Facilities Space Modification Requests
§ Facilities Policy on Performing Work
§ Facilities Services Role and Responsibilities
§ Project Management Guidelines
§ Maintenance Vendor Agreements
The development of these policies and procedures
aims to effectively control costs and align stakeholder expectations, particularly when it comes to requests for additional services or work performed
by external parties not directly affiliated with the
Facilities Department.
NEXT STEPS
MAAS Companies, Inc. 20
We would like to express our sincere appreciation to all the individuals and organizations who have contributed to the development of the Cathedral City Facilities Master Plan, Phase I. This comprehensive plan serves as a guiding document for the effective management and maintenance of the city-owned facilities, ensuring their optimal functionality and longevity.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Cathedral City
§ Mayor and City Council for Cathedral City
§ Charlie McClendon, City Manager
§ Tami Scott, Administrative Service Director (Retired) § Kevin Biersack, Financial Services Director
§ Horst Schnur, Facilities Manager (Retired)
§ Edward Moore, Facilities Manager
§ Rudy Ayala, Assistant Facilities Maintenance Supervisor § Roberto Ambriz, Facilities Maintenance Worker II
§ London Pyle, Accountant II
MAAS Companies, Inc.
§ Mac McGinnis, Vice President
§ Susan Marshburn, Project Specialist
§ Bo Ralston, Vice President of Operations
Terracon Consultants, Inc.
§ Doug Baum, National Director of Facility Asset Management § William Faesenmeier, Senior Facilities Consultant
§ Chloe Javaheri, Senior Staff Engineer
§ Kim Luu, Group Manager, Facilities Services
APPENDIX A - FACILITIES CONDITION ASSESSMENT
21 APPENDIX B - PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE REPORT
937
Staff Report
City Council
Item No. 3.D
Meeting Date: January 8, 2025
From: Kevin Biersack, Financial Services Director
Title: Tropical Storm Hilary FEMA Status Update
RECOMMENDATION:
This agenda item is for review and discussion only.
BACKGROUND:
On August 23, 2023, the City Council adopted a resolution ratifying the proclamation of the existence of a local emergency due to Tropical Storm Hilary. The City Council then authorized $1,062,000 on September 13, 2023, from the general fund, for Phase I Emergency Response Work for debris removal and for Emergency Protective Measures. Two weeks later on September 27, 2023, the City Council authorized $3,967,967 from the general fund for Phase I Emergency Response Work for soil removal.
The proclamation of the existence of a local emergency was continued on October 11, 2023, via resolution by the City Council. On November 21, 2023, California Hurricane Hilary was declared as a major disaster by President Biden, with the incident period cited as August 19, 2023, to August 21, 2023. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) assigned the code DR-4750-CA to the disaster declaration.
On November 29, 2023, the City Council approved a resolution continuing the proclamation of the existence of a local emergency due to Tropical Storm Hilary. City staff attended a FEMA applicant briefing for eastern Riverside County in Indio on December 7, 2023. On December 19, 2023, the City of Cathedral City submitted a request for public assistance to FEMA.
Staff from the city met with FEMA representatives assigned to our region during an exploratory call on February 7, 2024. On February 22, 2024, FEMA staff and city staff held a recovery scoping meeting, where they discuss locations and damage caused by the storm. On February 28, 2024, city staff began weekly meetings with a FEMA program delivery manager who assists staff in filing claims for costs related to damage caused by Tropical Storm Hilary.
On March 15, 2024, FEMA staff performed site inspections of damage caused by Tropical Storm Hilary.
City Council approved a contract on March 27, 2024, with Petrochem Materials Innovation to supply and apply Rubber Emulsion Aggregate Slurry (REAS) in three areas of the city, including the Panorama Neighborhood streets affected by Tropical Storm Hilary. The approved amount was $1,287,788.00 including the contingency.
On April 10, 2024, the City Council approved a contract with Hardy & Harper for pavement reconstruction in various sections of the Panorama Neighborhood, all affected by Tropical Storm Hilary. The approved amount was $731,400.00, including the contingency.
City Council approved a contract on June 26, 2024, with Contera Construction for the removal of soil from the Ofelia Bringas Memorial Bridge grade control structure and Date Palm Drive bridge channel lining, both affected by Tropical Storm Hilary. The approved amount was $3,094,099.15, including the contingency.
DISCUSSION:
The four basic components of FEMA Public Assistance eligibility are:
• Applicant – the City of Cathedral City, a sub-recipient under the State of California (CalOES, the California Office of Emergency Services)
• Facility – road, bridge, park
• Work – result of the declared incident in the designated areas of the disaster • Costs – documented and tied directly to eligible work FEMA divides work into multiple categories:
• Category A – emergency work for the removal of debris • Category B – emergency work for emergency protective measures • Category C – permanent work related to roads
• Category D – permanent work related to water control facilities, including debris removal to access those facilities
• Category E – permanent work related to public buildings and contents, not applicable to our claims related to Tropical Storm Hilary
• Category F – permanent work related to public utilities, not applicable to our claims related to Tropical Storm Hilary
• Category G – permanent work related to parks, recreation, and other facilities • Category Z – costs associated with preparing public assistance applications Funding for approved claims is divided into three parts:
• The federal share of assistance is 75% of eligible costs • The State of California share of assistance is 18.75% of eligible costs • The City of Cathedral City is responsible for 6.25% of eligible costs (the City’s match) Category Z costs are 100% federal share and may total up to 5% of the total of all FEMA obligated projects for a disaster.
For Category A work related to the removal of debris, the City of Cathedral City submitted an application in August 2024 for the following types of costs:
The current status of the $2,893,792 in claimed costs is “pending.” FEMA staff are reviewing documentation after a series of requests for clarification and additional data.
For Category B work related to emergency protective measures, the city submitted an application in June 2024 for the following types of costs:
The current status of the $152,007 in claimed costs is “obligated.” FEMA staff have completed the review and obligated funds to the recipient (the State of California). We are awaiting disbursement of funds from CalOES.
During an initial assessment in December 2023, the city identified eleven (11) road repairs due to Tropical Storm Hilary:
During the process of submitting claims, FEMA divided Horizon Road into three parts to address three types of damage (Horizon north of Adelina, Horizon south of Adelina, and the curb and gutter north of Adelina). The alleys were divided into the North-South Alley off Adelina Road and the East-West Alley off Horizon Road, between Adelina and Vista Chino.
For Category C work related to permanent work on roads, the city submitted two applications in November 2024 to reimburse costs related to four (4) road repairs:
The status of the $133,505 in claimed costs is “pending.” FEMA staff are reviewing our claims, which include REAS costs from Petrochem Materials Innovation on Adelina Road and Avenida La Vista and reconstruction costs from Hardy & Harper on the north section of Horizon Road and the curb and gutter located along that section of Horizon.
The city continues to work with FEMA on costs estimated at $640,280 for repairing seven (7) remaining road locations affected by Tropical Storm Hilary. These roads are under review with FEMA. There are eligibility concerns being addressed by our Public Works/Engineering department.
The status of the eleven (11) roads identified in December 2023 is as follows:
Date Palm Drive and Vista Chino Road are not eligible for claims under FEMA because they are Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) roads. There were no substantive costs to claim for Varner Road.
For Category D work related to water control facilities, the city submitted an application in December 2024 for costs related to debris removal under Ofelia Bringas Memorial Bridge, to regrading under Date Palm Drive Bridge, and to permitting.
The current status of $1,603,049 in claimed costs is “pending.” FEMA staff have received the documentation, and the application is in the review process.
For Category G permanent work related to parks, recreation, and other facilities, the city submitted an application in April 2024 to reimburse costs related to city-wide repair of parks and fencing:
The current status of $28,670 in claimed costs is “obligated.” FEMA staff have completed the review and obligated funds to the recipient (the State of California). We are awaiting disbursement of funds from CalOES.
The claims for costs for FEMA projects are summarized as the following:
The anticipated administrative costs are calculated as 5% of cost submissions for categories A through G, not including C – Other Roads which is yet to be submitted. The total of all applications in the amount of $5,051,574 is an estimate because not all projects are obligated.
Thus, the FEMA portion, the CalOES portion, and the Cathedral City portion of the costs are also estimates, except in the case of Categories B and G, which are obligated.
Once a project is obligated, CalOES estimates it can be up to three (3) months to process reimbursement. CalOES sends the FEMA and CalOES portions together. Thus, we can expect Category B funds of $142,506 and Category G funds of $26,878 in this fiscal year.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The receipt of additional funds for the other categories or the timing of such reimbursements cannot be determined at this time. Staff continues to work with FEMA to provide any clarification or provide any additional information requested.
FIVE-YEAR STRATEGIC PLAN:
GOAL B: COMMUNITY INVESTMENT
Objective: Cathedral City roads, gateway, public spaces and other city infrastructure are well planned, designed, constructed, and maintained.
CITY COUNCIL
MINUTES
Special Meeting
Tuesday, December 10, 2024
City Council Chambers
68-700 Avenida Lalo Guerrero
Cathedral City, CA 92234
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Mark Carnevale called the meeting to order at 5:00 p.m.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Councilmember Raymond Gregory led the Pledge of Allegiance.
INVOCATION (MOMENT OF REFLECTION)
Mayor Mark Carnevale offered the Invocation.
ROLL CALL
Council Present:
Mark Carnevale, Mayor
Nancy Ross, Mayor Pro Tem
Raymond Gregory, Councilmember
Ernesto Gutierrez, Councilmember
Rita Lamb, Councilmember
AGENDA FINALIZATION
There were no changes to the Agenda.
1. LEGISLATIVE ACTIONS
A. Declaration of Results for the November 5, 2024 Municipal Election Recommendation: To adopt a Resolution declaring the results of the November 5, 2024, election as certified by the Riverside County Registrar of Voters.
Alan Carvalho congratulated the newly elected Councilmembers and stated he is proud that Measure W passed successful.
Reso 2024-47
A motion was made by Councilmember Gregory and seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Ross to adopt a Resolution declaring the results of the November 5, 2024, election as certified by the Riverside County Registrar of Voters.
RESULT: PASS [5 TO 0]
MOVER: Raymond Gregory, Councilmember
SECONDER: Nancy Ross, Mayor Pro Tem
AYES: Carnevale, Ross, Gregory, Gutierrez, Lamb
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
B. Oath of Office for Newly Elected Councilmembers
Recommendation: The City Clerk will issue the Oath of Office to the Newly Elected Councilmembers for District One and District Two.
Tracey Hermosillo, City Clerk, administered the Oath of Office to re-elected Councilmembers Rita Lamb and Nancy Ross.
C. Appointment of Mayor and Mayor Pro Tem
Recommendation: To appoint Nancy Ross to serve as Mayor and Raymond Gregory to serve as Mayor Pro Tem, pursuant to Section
2.04.180 of the Cathedral City Municipal Code.
M.O. 2024-195
A motion was made by Councilmember Gutierrez and seconded by Councilmember Lamb to appoint Nancy Ross to serve as Mayor and Raymond Gregory to serve as Mayor Pro Tem pursuant to Section 2.04.180 of the Cathedral City Municipal Code.
RESULT: PASS [5 TO 0]
MOVER: Ernesto Gutierrez, Councilmember
SECONDER: Rita Lamb, Councilmember
AYES: Carnevale, Ross, Gregory, Gutierrez, Lamb
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
D. Oath of Office for Mayor and Mayor Pro Tem
Recommendation: The City Clerk will issue the Oath of Office to the Newly Appointed Mayor and Mayor Pro Tem
Tracey Hermosillo, City Clerk, administered the Oath of Office to Nancy Ross as appointed Mayor for 2025 and Raymond Gregory as appointed Mayor Pro Tem for 2025.
Felipe Ortiz, Congressman Greg Wallis’ Office, presented a proclamation to newly appointed Mayor Nancy Ross.
Mayor Nancy Ross presented outgoing Mayor Mark Carnevale with a gift.
A video was presented to honor outgoing Mayor Mark Carnevale for his year of service as Mayor of Cathedral City.
2. COUNCIL REPORTS
Councilmember Rita Lamb congratulated newly appointed Mayor Nancy Ross. She shared some thoughtful words and thanked outgoing Mayor Mark Carnevale for his leadership over the past year.
Mayor Pro Tem Raymond Gregory shared some thoughtful words and discussed outgoing Mayor Mark Carnevale’s leadership over the years.
Councilmember Ernesto Gutierrez congratulated Councilmember Rita Lamb, Mayor Pro Tem Raymond Gregory, and Mayor Nancy Ross. He shared some thoughtful words about Mayor Nancy Ross, Mayor Pro Tem Raymond Greogry and outgoing Mayor Mark Carnevale.
Mayor Nancy Ross concurs with all the comments that were made, and she shared some thoughtful words about outgoing Mayor Mark Carnevale.
Councilmember Mark Carnevale reflected on this last year as Mayor of Cathedral City.
He thanked everyone for their efforts to make Cathedral City a safer and more sustainable place to live. He thanked various members in attendance, the City Council, the Commissions and City Staff for their support over the last year.
Mayor Nancy Ross thanked all in attendance and invited everyone to the reception.
ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Nancy Ross adjourned the meeting at 5:36 p.m.
Mayor, City of Cathedral City City Clerk, City of Cathedral City
CITY COUNCIL
MINUTES
Study & Regular Meeting
Wednesday, December 11, 2024
City Council Chambers
68-700 Avenida Lalo Guerrero
Cathedral City, CA 92234
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Nancy Ross called the Study Session portion of the meeting to order at 3:00 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Council Present:
Mark Carnevale
Nancy Ross
Raymond Gregory
Ernesto Gutierrez
Rita Lamb
AGENDA FINALIZATION
Item 3D. Facilities Master Plan was continued to the January 8, 2025, meeting.
1. PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no members of the public that wished to speak.
2. CLOSED SESSION
City Attorney Eric Vail announced that the City Council will meet in Closed Session to discuss the items listed on the Agenda.
A. Conference with Legal Counsel - Anticipated Litigation Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to Government Code section 54956.9(d)(2). Number of Claims 3.
1. Craig Sanborn – Claim for Damages
2. Robert Williams – Claim for Damages
3. Christopher Jackson – Claim for Damages
Recommendation: There is no Staff Recommendation
B. Conference with Legal Counsel - Existing Litigation, Pursuant to Government Code section 54956.9(d)(1)
Number of Matters: One (1) Irene Gorosave -Torres v. City of Cathedral City et al.
Case No.: CVPS2406366
Recommendation: There is no Staff Recommendation
C. Conference with Labor Negotiator Pursuant to Government Code 54957.6 Labor Negotiator: Algeria Ford, Assistant City Attorney and Eugenia Torres, Human Resources Manager
Employee Organization: Police Officers Association
Recommendation: There is no Staff Recommendation
The City Council recessed into Closed Session at 3:01 p.m.
The City Council reconvened at 4:00 p.m.
City Attorney Eric Vail announced that the City Council met in Closed Sessio to discuss the items listed on the agenda. Items 2A. Conference with Legal Counsel- Anticipated Litigation, 2B. Conference with Legal Counsel- Existing Litigation and 3A. Conference with Labor Negotiator were completed and direction was provided by the City Council. There was no other reportable action taken.
3. STUDY SESSION
A. Cathedral City Community Amphitheater Marketing Update Recommendation: This item is presented for information, discussion, and direction only.
Ryan Hunt, Communications and Events Manager, provided an update on the marketing of the Cathedral City Community Amphitheater. The following points were presented:
• Strategic Plan Goals
o F-2 Promote additional community events and celebrations o F-3 Develop and implement a marketing plan to promote and raise awareness of available city venues such as the
Community Amphitheater
• Background
• Milestones
• Marketing Initiatives
• Amphitheater Events By Year
• Future Recommendations
Shelley Kaplan stated that he was at the LeeAnn Rimes concert and feels the City of Cathedral City has the best amphitheater in the Coachella Valley.
This was a presentation only, there was no formal action taken by the City Council.
B. Code Compliance Division Updates
Recommendation: There is no specific recommendation, this staff report and presentation are intended to provide updates from the Code Compliance division. City Council may elect to provide feedback on specific focal areas of the presentation that may guide and inform future presentations and actions.
Justin Gardiner, Code Compliance Manager, provided an update on the Code Compliance Division. The following points were presented:
• The Code Compliance Team
• Personal and Professional Milestones
• Code Compliance Process
• Caseload
• Efforts
• Incoming Code Compliance Reporting
• Reporting Statistics
• Cannabis Compliance
• Growing Cannabis Compliance
• Mobile Home Parks
• Shopping Carts and Illegal Vending
• Vacation Rentals
• Code Compliance Technologies
• Compliance Achieved
• Future Goals for Code Compliance
David Sanchez, expressed his concern with the trash in his neighborhood. He would like to see Code Compliance doing a better job enforcing the code. He feels that the Ramon Road median fencing is not working. He expressed his concern with how police officers are ticketing people and allowing gates in front of houses.
Alan Carvalho, expressed his concern with the name of the Code Compliance Department.
Reg Trowell, expressed his concern with the cannabis order in the City and would like to see some action taken.
This was a presentation only, there was no reportable action taken by the City Council.
C. Measure W Implementation Plan
Recommendation: This item is presented for information, discussion and direction only.
Charles McClendon provided an overview on the Measure W Implementation Plan. The following points were presented:
• Background
o Resident Study Committee
o Identified Unfunded Needs in the City
o Report to Council on January 24, 2024
o Community Survey and Resident Input
• Measure W Implementation Plan
o Joining the Desert Recreation District (DRD)
o Community Recreation Center Planning
o Additional Ambulance for the Fire Department
o Improving Neighborhood Streets
• Action B-13 of Strategic Plan
Shelley Kaplan, thanked all those for their efforts and support to pass Measure W.
Alan Carvalho, feels the public has confidence in the City Council.
This item was a presentation only, there was no formal action taken by the City Council.
D. Facilities Master Plan Update
Recommendation: This agenda item is for review and discussion only.
This item was continued to the January 8, 2025, City Council meeting.
RECESS
Mayor Ross adjourned the Study Session portion of the meeting at 5:30 p.m.
REGULAR MEETING - 5:30 PM
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Nancy Ross called the Regular Meeting to order at 5:35 p.m.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Mayor Nancy Ross led the Pledge of Allegiance.
INVOCATION (MOMENT OF REFLECTION)
Councilmember Rita Lamb offered a moment of reflection.
ROLL CALL
Council Present:
Mark Carnevale
Nancy Ross
Raymond Gregory
Ernesto Gutierrez
Rita Lamb
AGENDA FINALIZATION
There were no changes to the Regular City Council Meeting Agenda.
1. PUBLIC COMMENTS
Sherry Mindel, expressed her concern with the cannabis facility and odor near her property.
Janet Ream, expressed her concern with the cannabis facility and odor on her property.
Maryellen Muir, expressed her concern with the cannabis facility and odor near her property.
Rodney Troutner, expressed his concern with the cannabis facility and odor near his property.
Scott McDonald, inquired about a public records request he submitted. He expressed his concern with the amount of cannabis in the City.
Linda McDonald, expressed her concern with the cannabis facility and odor near her property.
Tony Sanfratello, expressed his concern with the health and safety issues at Tramview Mobile Home park.
Tiffany LoBue, congratulated Mayor Nancy Ross on her appointment to the Animal Campus. She encouraged the City to focus on spay and neuter education and services in the upcoming year.
2. COUNCIL REPORTS
Councilmember Rita Lamb reported on the following:
• The Coachella Valley Mountains Conservancy’s recent activities • Her attendance at the Volkswagen Ribbon Cutting
• Her attendance at the Economic Development Department’s Small Business Workshop
• Her participation in the Rotary’s Mayors Golf Tournament • The next city shredding event
• Her attendance at the Boys and Girls Club Annual Gala • The next Emergency Preparedness Event is scheduled for February 1, 2025, at the Cathedral City Library
• She recognized Erin Hyland for participating in the “Read with Me” Program • She recognized Bob Casey for his volunteerism at the Senior Center Councilmember Mark Carnevale reported on the following:
• His attendance at the Animal Campus meeting
• His attendance at the Coachella Valley Association of Governments Executive Committee Meeting
• His conversation with the staff of the C4 cannabis facility • The positive and negative comments he has received regarding cannabis odor • His attendance at the International Balloon Festival
• His participation in the Rotary’s Mayor’s Golf Tournament • His attendance at the Police Department’s Shop with a Cop Event • The upcoming Snowfest Event
• The upcoming Boomers Hanukkah Event
• He wished everyone a Merry Christmas, Happy New Year and Happy Hanukkah Councilmember Ernesto Gutierrez reported on the following:
• His attendance at the International Balloon Festival
• His attendance at the Senior Center’s Day of Gratitude • Council updated their photos
• His attendance at the Boys and Girls Club Annual Gala • The recent Special City Council Meeting
• Calls he received regarding illegal vendors, requested speed signs, and coyotes • His conversation with a business owner regarding illegal activity and code violations
• The upcoming City Council meeting scheduled for January 8, 2025 • He wished everyone a Merry Christmas and Happy New Year • The upcoming Mayor’s Tree Lighting and Snowfest Event Councilmember Raymond Gregory reported on the following:
• The Coachella Valley Association of Governments Public Safety Meeting, where he was elected as Chair
• His attendance at the Homelessness Committee
• His attendance at the Peace Officers Public Safety Awards • His attendance at the Transgender Day of Remembrance, held at Palm Springs City Hall
• His attendance at the Welbehealth Grand Opening
• His attendance at the International Balloon Festival
• His attendance at the Brunch with Patsi fundraiser
• His attendance at the Boys and Girls Club Annual Gala • His attendance at the Riverside County Transportation Commission Meeting • The upcoming Snowfest Event and Mayor’s Tree Lighting • The upcoming Blue Light Ceremony on Monday December 16, 2024 • He wished everyone Happy Holidays
• The next City Council meeting scheduled for Wednesday, January 8, 2025 Mayor Nancy Ross reported on the following:
• He recent vacation
• Her meeting with several leaders of non-profit organizations • Her attendance at the International Balloon Festival
• The upcoming Mayor’s Tree Lighting and Snowfest Events
3. CONSENT AGENDA
A. Waive Full Reading of Ordinances on Agenda
Recommendation: Waive Full Reading of Ordinances on Agenda M.O. 2024-196
B. Approval of November 13, 2024 Study Session and Regular Council Meeting Minutes
Recommendation: Approve November 13, 2024 Study Session and Regular Council Meeting Minutes.
M.O. 2024-197
C. Demand Register - November 2024
Recommendation: Receive and File
M.O. 2024-198
D. Approve a Resolution Adopting an Updated City-Wide Salary Schedule Recommendation: To adopt a resolution approving city-wide publicly available pay schedules in compliance with California
Code of Regulations, Title 2, Sections 570.5, 571, 571.1 This resolution will supersede all previous resolutions regarding job classifications and compensation levels to the extent they conflict with this new recommendation.
Reso 2024-48
E. Administrative Amendment to the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) FY 2020-21 and FY 2023-24 Annual Action Plans
Recommendation: To approve an Administrative Amendment to the city’s FY 2020-21 and FY 2023-24 Community Development
Block Grant (CDBG) Annual Action Plans (AAP) to
allocate remaining CDBG funds to supplement the
Whitewater Neighborhood Road Improvement Project
and reallocate remaining CDBG CARES Act (CDBGCV) funds for Desert Access and Mobility for submittal to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban
Development (HUD).
M.O. 2024-199
F. Council Appointments to Various Local Agencies
Recommendation: To review the list of Local Agency Assignments and ratify the appointments.
M.O. 2024-200
G. Task Order for the Design of Traffic Signal and Intersection Improvements at East Palm Canyon Drive and Cree Road
Recommendation: Approve Task Order 01 for engineering design services of a traffic signal at the intersection of East Palm
Canyon Drive and Cree Road with the city’s on-call
engineering support consultant, Interwest Consulting
Group in the not to exceed amount of $76,800; and
authorize the City Engineer to execute the Task Order.
M.O. 2024-201
A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Gregory and seconded by Councilmember Lamb to approve the Consent Agenda.
RESULT: PASS [5 TO 0]
MOVER: Raymond Gregory, Mayor Pro Tem
SECONDER: Rita Lamb, Councilmember
AYES: Carnevale, Ross, Gregory, Gutierrez, Lamb
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
4. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. First reading of an ordinance to amend zoning code to add driveway width standard, allow a greater percentage of front yard to be improved as a driveway, introduce civil fines for parking infractions, and prohibit parking in front of a mailbox.
Recommendation: Introduce and provide first reading by title only; and waive further readings of an ordinance to amend Title 9 and Title 12 of the Cathedral City Municipal Code by amending
Chapters 9.12, 9.14, 12.12, and 12.32. The proposed
changes will revise sections relating to driveway width and guidelines for the percentage of the front yard that can be improved as a driveway, introduce civil fines for parking infractions, and amend areas designated as no parking
areas to include restrictions for parking in front of a mailbox.
Elizabeth Medina, Analyst I, provided an overview of the proposed Ordinance to amend the zoning code to add driveway width standards, allow a greater percentage of front yard to be improved as a driveway, introduce civil fines for parking infractions, and prohibit parking in front of mailboxes.
Mayor Nancy Ross opened the Public Hearing to receive public comments, seeing none, she closed the Public Hearing and returned discussion to the City Council.
M.O. 2024-202
A motion was made by Councilmember Gutierrez and seconded by Councilmember Carnevale to introduce and provide first reading by title only; and waive further readings of an ordinance to amend Title 9 and Title 12 of the Cathedral City Municipal Code by amending Chapters 9.12, 9.14, 12.12, and 12.32 revising sections relating to driveway width and guidelines for the percentage of the front yard that can be improved as a driveway, introduce civil fines for parking infractions, and amend areas designated as no parking areas to include restrictions for parking in front of a mailbox.
RESULT: PASS [5 TO 0]
MOVER: Ernesto Gutierrez, Councilmember
SECONDER: Mark Carnevale, Councilmember
AYES: Carnevale, Ross, Gregory, Gutierrez, Lamb
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
B. Assembly Bill (AB) 1600 Fiscal Year 2023/2024 Development Impact Fee Report
Recommendation: To approve a resolution accepting the Annual AB 1600 Development Fee Report for the Fiscal Year (FY)
2023/2024
Kevin Biersack, Director of Financial Services, provided an overview of AB 1600 Fiscal Year 2023/2024 Development Impact Fee Report.
Mayor Nancy Ross Opened the Public Hearing to receive public comments, seeing none, she closed the Public Hearing and returned discussion to the City Council.
Reso 2024-49
A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Gregory and seconded by Councilmember Lamb to approve a resolution accepting the Annual AB 1600 Development Fee Report for the Fiscal Year (FY) 2023/2024.
RESULT: PASS [5 TO 0]
MOVER: Raymond Gregory, Mayor Pro Tem
SECONDER: Rita Lamb, Councilmember
AYES: Carnevale, Ross, Gregory, Gutierrez, Lamb
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
5. LEGISLATIVE ACTIONS
A. Purchase of One New Ambulance
Recommendation: The Fire Department requests authorization to purchase one Medix MSV 170 ambulance on a 2024 chassis from
Republic Emergency Vehicle Services (EVS), to include a Striker Power Gurney and Loader in the amount
$388,982.72.
M.O. 2024-203
A motion was made by Councilmember Gutierrez and seconded by Councilmember Carnevale to authorize the purchase of one Medix MSV 170 ambulance on a 2024 chassis from Republic Emergency Vehicle Services (EVS), to include a Striker Power Gurney and Loader in the amount $388,982.72.
RESULT: PASS [5 TO 0] PASS [5 TO 0]
MOVER: Ernesto Gutierrez, Councilmember Ernesto Gutie
SECONDER: Mark Carnevale, Councilmember Mark Carneva
AYES: Carnevale, Ross, Gregory, Gutierrez, Lamb Carnevale, Ro NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
B. Contract Award for Design Professional Services to STC Traffic, Inc. for the SB 821 Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Program for Perez Road Class IV Separated Bikeways Project (C08673) and Whispering Palms Trail Class III Bike Routes Project (C08672).
Recommendation: • To award a professional services agreement to STC Traffic, Inc. for the SB 821 Bicycle and Pedestrian
Facilities program to prepare the plans,
specifications, right of way and environmental
documents for the:
o Perez Road Class IV Separated Bikeways
project (C08673), in the amount of
$31,760.00; and approve a ten percent (10%)
contingency for unforeseen design related
contingencies in the amount of $3,240.00;
thereby bringing the total design
encumbrance for this project to $35,000.00;
and,
o Whispering Palms Trail Class III Bike Routes
project (C08672), in the amount of
$31,760.00; and approve a ten percent (10%)
contingency for unforeseen design related
contingencies in the amount of $3,240.00;
thereby bringing the total design
encumbrance for this project to $35,000.00;
and,
• Authorize the City Manager to execute the contract.
M.O. 2024-204
A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Gregory and seconded by Councilmember Lamb to approve a professional services agreement to STC Traffic, Inc. for the SB 821 Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities program to prepare the plans, specifications, right of way and environmental documents for the:
o Perez Road Class IV Separated Bikeways project (C08673), in the amount of $31,760.00; and approve a ten percent (10%) contingency for unforeseen design related contingencies in the amount of $3,240.00; thereby bringing the total design
encumbrance for this project to $35,000.00; and,
o Whispering Palms Trail Class III Bike Routes project (C08672), in the amount of $31,760.00; and approve a ten percent (10%) contingency for unforeseen design related contingencies in the amount of $3,240.00; thereby bringing the total design
encumbrance for this project to $35,000.00; and,
Authorize the City Manager to execute the contract.
RESULT: PASS [5 TO 0]
MOVER: Raymond Gregory, Mayor Pro Tem
SECONDER: Rita Lamb, Councilmember
AYES: Carnevale, Ross, Gregory, Gutierrez, Lamb
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
C. Amendment Number Two to the Reimbursement Agreement with the Coachella Valley Association of Governments for the Cathedral Canyon Bridge Project to Provide for Traffic Signal Improvements at the Intersection Between Canyon Shores Drive and Cathedral Canyon Drive.
Recommendation: To authorize the Mayor and the City Manager to execute Amendment Number Two to the reimbursement agreement
between the Coachella Valley Association of Governments (CVAG) and the City of Cathedral City for the construction of Cathedral Canyon Bridge project in an amount not-toexceed $700,000 to provide engineering design and construction of traffic signal improvements at the
intersection between Canyon Shores Drive and Cathedral
Canyon Drive; and, approve a budget adjustment for the
same amount.
M.O. 2024-205
A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Gregory and seconded by Councilmember Lamb to authorize the Mayor and the City Manager to execute Amendment Number Two to the reimbursement agreement between the Coachella Valley Association of Governments (CVAG) and the City of Cathedral City for the construction of Cathedral Canyon Bridge project in an amount not-to-exceed $700,000 to provide engineering design and construction of traffic signal improvements at the intersection between Canyon Shores Drive and Cathedral Canyon Drive; and, approve a budget adjustment for the same amount.
RESULT: PASS [5 TO 0]
MOVER: Raymond Gregory, Mayor Pro Tem
SECONDER: Rita Lamb, Councilmember
AYES: Carnevale, Ross, Gregory, Gutierrez, Lamb
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
The City Council recessed at 7:53 p.m.
The City Council reconvened at 7:59 p.m.
D. Contract Award for Zoning Code Update
Recommendation: To approve a professional services agreement with Mintier Harnish, to update the City’s zoning code and authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement.
M.O. 2024-206
A motion was made by Councilmember Lamb and seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Gregory to approve a professional services agreement with Mintier Harnish, to update the City’s zoning code and authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement.
RESULT: PASS [5 TO 0]
MOVER: Rita Lamb, Councilmember
SECONDER: Raymond Gregory, Mayor Pro Tem
AYES: Carnevale, Ross, Gregory, Gutierrez, Lamb
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
E. Purchase of Fire Department PSEC Radios
Recommendation: To authorize the purchase of 24 portable and 15 mobile radios from Motorola Solutions in the amount of
$431,253.91, and authorize the city manager or designee, to execute all necessary documents for the purchase.
M.O. 2024-207
A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Gregory and seconded by Councilmember Lamb to authorize the purchase of 24 portable and 15 mobile radios from Motorola Solutions in the amount of $431,253.91, and authorize the city manager or designee, to execute all necessary documents for the purchase.
RESULT: PASS [5 TO 0]
MOVER: Raymond Gregory, Mayor Pro Tem
SECONDER: Rita Lamb, Councilmember
AYES: Carnevale, Ross, Gregory, Gutierrez, Lamb
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
F. Award a Construction Contract to Hardy and Harper, Inc. for the FY 2024- 2025 City Streets Pavement Reconstruction Projects
Recommendation: To award a construction contract to Hardy and Harper, Inc. in the amount of $1,432,000.00 for the fiscal year (FY) 2024-2025 City Streets Pavement Reconstruction Projects at Shifting Sands Trail (C08688), Sky Blue Water Trail
(C08689), 33rd Avenue (C08690), Ventura Drive
(C08691), and Avenida Quintana (C08692); and, approve
a fifteen percent (15%) contingency in the amount of
$214,800.00 for unforeseeable construction costs, thereby bringing the total to $1,646,800.00; and, authorize the City Manager to execute the required contract documents; and, authorize the City Engineer to request bonds and insurance for the project, and issue the notice to proceed.
M.O. 2024-208
A motion was made by Councilmember Lamb and seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Gregory to award a construction contract to Hardy and Harper, Inc. in the amount of $1,432,000.00 for the fiscal year (FY) 2024-2025 City Streets Pavement Reconstruction Projects at Shifting Sands Trail (C08688), Sky Blue Water Trail (C08689), 33rd Avenue (C08690), Ventura Drive (C08691), and Avenida Quintana (C08692); and, approve a fifteen percent (15%) contingency in the amount of $214,800.00 for unforeseeable construction costs, thereby bringing the total to $1,646,800.00; and, authorize the City Manager to execute the required contract documents; and, authorize the City Engineer to request bonds and insurance for the project, and issue the notice to proceed.
RESULT: PASS [5 TO 0]
MOVER: Rita Lamb, Councilmember
SECONDER: Raymond Gregory, Mayor Pro Tem
AYES: Carnevale, Ross, Gregory, Gutierrez, Lamb
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
G. Civic Center Elevator Replacement
Recommendation: To authorize staff to purchase and install two new elevators in the Civic Center complex for City Hall and the Police Department in the amount of $307,740.79 and authorize
the City Manager to execute the contract required to
complete the work; and authorize a Facilities
Fund (614) budget amendment.
M.O. 2024-209
A motion was made by Councilmember Carnevale and seconded by Councilmember Lamb to authorize staff to purchase and install two new elevators in the Civic Center complex for City Hall and the Police Department in the amount of $307,740.79 and authorize the City Manager to execute the contract required to complete the work; and authorize a Facilities Fund (614) budget amendment.
RESULT: PASS [5 TO 0]
MOVER: Mark Carnevale, Councilmember
SECONDER: Rita Lamb, Councilmember
AYES: Carnevale, Ross, Gregory, Gutierrez, Lamb
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
H. Resolutions Authorizing the City Manager to Execute Agreements with the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration for the Implementation of a Local Transactions and Use Tax and the Authorization of Examination of Records
Recommendation: 1. Adopt a Resolution entitled, “A RESOLUTION OF THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CATHEDRAL CITY,
CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO
EXECUTE AGREEMENTS WITH THE CALIFORNIA
DEPARTMENT OF TAX AND FEE ADMINISTRATION
FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF A LOCAL TRANSACTIONS
AND USE TAX.”
2. Adopt a Resolution entitled, “A RESOLUTION OF THE
CITY OF CATHEDRAL CITY AUTHORIZING
EXAMINATION OF SALES AND TRANSACTIONS AND
USE TAXES RECORDS.”
3. Authorize the necessary budget amendment of
$175,000.
Reso 2024-50
Reso 2024-51
M.O. 2024-210
A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Gregory and seconded by Councilmember Carnevale to:
1. Adopt a Resolution entitled, “A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF CATHEDRAL CITY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING
THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AGREEMENTS WITH THE
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TAX AND FEE ADMINISTRATION
FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF A LOCAL TRANSACTIONS AND USE
TAX.”
2. Adopt a Resolution entitled, “A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF
CATHEDRAL CITY AUTHORIZING EXAMINATION OF SALES AND
TRANSACTIONS AND USE TAXES RECORDS.”
3. Authorize the necessary budget amendment of $175,000.
RESULT: PASS [5 TO 0]
MOVER: Raymond Gregory, Mayor Pro Tem
SECONDER: Mark Carnevale, Councilmember
AYES: Carnevale, Ross, Gregory, Gutierrez, Lamb
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
6. DISCUSSION ON FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
There was no discussion on future agenda items.
7. CLOSED SESSION
There were no Closed Session Items.
ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Nancy Ross adjourned the Regular Meeting at 8:55 p.m.
Mayor, City of Cathedral City City Clerk, City of Cathedral City Staff Report
City Council
Item No. 3.C
Meeting Date: January 8, 2025
From: John A. Corella, Director of Public Works and Andrew Firestine, AICP, Director of Community and Economic Development
Title: Second Reading of an Ordinance to Amend Zoning Code to Add Driveway Width Standard, Allow a Greater Percentage of Front Yard to Be Improved as a Driveway, Introduce Civil Fines for Parking Violations, and Prohibit Parking in Front of a Mailbox.
RECOMMENDATION:
To waive reading beyond the title; provide second reading by title only; and adopt an ordinance to amend Title 9 and Title 12 of the Cathedral City Municipal Code by amending Chapters 9.12, 9.14, 12.12, and 12.32. The proposed changes will revise sections relating to driveway width and guidelines for the percentage of the front yard that can be improved as a driveway, introduce civil fines for parking violations, and amend areas designated as no parking areas to include restrictions for parking in front of a mailbox.
BACKGROUND:
In 1989, Ordinance No. 256 and 263 established the current residential development standards, including the parking standards for the Single Family Residential (R1), Residential Estate (RE), and Multiple Family Residential (R2) zoning districts. In 1990, Ordinance No. 307 amended these standards to allow the R1 and RE parking restrictions to be exceeded through a conditional use permit. These regulations are codified in the Cathedral City Municipal Code (CCMC) Sections 9.12.100 Access to Parking (Driveways), 9.14.090 Parking, and 9.14.100 Access to Parking (Driveways). Excerpts of the current CCMC for are provided for reference in Attachment 1.
The CCMC parking standards were developed for traditional single-family residential developments consisting of a home with a garage and a driveway, and a maximum percentage of a front or street side yard that may be improved as a driveway or open parking area. These current standards reinforce historic development patterns that restricted parking and promoted front yard landscaping. Since the parking standards were last amended in 1989 and 1990, several variables have changed that have affected the demand for parking.
The city receives about seven to eight complaints monthly of vehicles and trailers parked on landscape surfaces, and complaints and code violations are found to be most frequent when the property fronts a major corridor or a street with no on-street parking.
Related to the above is on-street parking in residential neighborhoods. In much the same way that parking spills over from driveways onto landscape surfaces, it also affects the availability of on-street parking and at times creates conflicts with mail service delivery when a mailbox is blocked by a parked vehicle. While the list of no parking areas is extensive in the CCMC, the city does not have an ordinance that specifically states that vehicles cannot be parked in front of a mailbox. The current verbiage of section 12.32.080 of the CCMC is included in Attachment 1 for reference.
The city has received five complaints year-to-date for vehicles blocking a mailbox through the My Cathedral City app and one during the public comment section of the September 11, 2024, City Council meeting, including those that have reported the refusal of the USPS to deliver mail when a vehicle is parked in front of a mailbox.
Furthermore, the CCMC currently only has language regarding who can issue parking violation fines. There is no established fine schedule that could be used as a tool to limit parking offenses. Adding language for civil fines could give city parking enforcement officers a tool to use, and a fine schedule with increased fines for multiple offenses could deter repeat offenders.
At the September 25, 2024, City Council Study Session, city staff recommended an amendment to the zoning code to allow a greater percentage of the front yard or street-side yard to be improved as a driveway or open parking area for lots fronting certain roadway classifications. Staff also proposed an amendment to municipal code to prohibit parking in front of mailboxes. The City Council gave guidance and expressed support at the September 25, 2024, Study Session to proceed with drafting amendments to the CCMC.
On November 20, 2024, during a Public Hearing, the Planning Commission adopted a resolution to recommend that the City Council adopt the proposed ordinance that is attached to this staff report.
At the December 11, 2024, City Council meeting, the first reading of the proposed ordinance was presented at a Public Hearing. No comments from the public were received. City Council approved the first reading of the ordinance.
DISCUSSION:
To complete the amendment to the zoning code to improve front and side residential yards to increase the availability of parking, CCMC Title 9 Planning and Zoning, specifically Chapter 9.12 RE Residential Estate District and Chapter 9.14 R1 Single-Family Residential District required review. Additionally, to initiate the amendment to CCMC to prohibit parking in front of a mailbox and establish civil fines for parking violations, CCMC Title 12 Vehicles and Traffic, specifically Chapter 12.12 Enforcement-Obedience and Chapter 12.32 Parking required review.
Review of CCMC Title 9 Planning and Zoning, Chapter 9.12 requires one (1) amendment.
Chapter 9.14 requires two (2) amendments.
To be amended:
· Section 9.12.100 Access to Parking (Driveways)
· Section 9.14.090 Parking
· Section 9.14.100 Access to Parking (Driveways)
The amendment to Section 9.12.100 updates the minimum and maximum width allowed for driveways in the RE District and includes the addition of more materials allowed for driveways and parking areas. The amendment is as follows:
All parking spaces and structures shall be served by a driveway that meets the following standards:
A. Minimum width of driveway: 16 feet,
B. Maximum width of driveway: 36 feet,
C. Driveways and open parking areas shall be constructed of Portland cement concrete or similar durability material approved by the City Engineer; and D. Driveways and open parking areas shall not cover more than thirty percent of the required front or street side yard area.
The amendment to Section 9.14.090 subsection D updates the allowed materials that can be used for driveways and parking areas in the R1 District. The amendment is shown in the relevant excerpt as follows:
D. Vehicles shall not be parked or stored in any front or street side yard area except on driveways or open parking spaces constructed of Portland cement concrete or similar durability material approved by the City Engineer. Driveways and improved parking areas shall not cover more than fifty percent of the required front or street side yard area.
The amendment to Section 9.14.100 updates the minimum and maximum width allowed for driveways in the R1 District and includes the addition of more materials allowed for driveways and parking areas. The amendment is as follows:
All parking spaces and structures shall be served by a driveway that meets the following standards:
A. Minimum width of driveway: 16 feet;
B. Maximum width of driveway: 36 feet;
C. Driveways and open parking areas shall be constructed of Portland cement concrete or similar durability material approved by the City Engineer; and D. Driveways and open parking areas shall not cover more than fifty percent of the required front or street side yard area except where a property fronts onto a major or arterial street classification. For properties fronting onto a major or arterial street classification, up to seventy-five percent coverage may be allowed where the City Engineer determines that a turnaround or circular driveway is required or where on-street parking adjacent to the property is prohibited.
Review of CCMC Title 12 Vehicles and Traffic, specifically Chapter 12.12 EnforcementObedience, requires one (1) addition. Chapter 12.32 Parking requires one (1) amendment.
To be added:
· Section 12.12.130 Civil Fines
To be amended:
· Section 12.32.080 No Parking Areas
The amendment of Section 12.32.080 with the addition of subsection J updates the list of areas in which a vehicle cannot park or be left stopped to include restrictions for parking in front of a mailbox. The following relevant excerpt shows the amendment to the section:
J. In front of, or within ten (10) feet of, any individual mailbox, community mailbox, cluster of mailboxes, or United States postal receptacle available to the public during the hours of eight a.m. to seven p.m. of that same day (except Sundays and federal holidays). The length of time a vehicle is permitted to stop in front of any individual mailbox, community mailbox, cluster of mailboxes, or United States postal receptacle available to the public shall be limited to the time a person is involved in the act of depositing and/or collecting mail in the applicable receptacle.
Clarifying Edits (Since First Reading)
The addition of Section 12.12.130 Civil Fines adds guidelines to issue fines for any parking violation. The fines for violations in this section are redundant with the offense outlined in Section 1.04.060 Civil Fines, as well as other sections of the CCMC. The addition states as follows:
Each separate parking citation or notice of violation, related to charging violations of local or Vehicle Code regulations governing the parking or standing of vehicles, shall be subject to:
(a) a fine in an amount not to exceed two hundred fifty dollars for a first violation; (b) a fine in an amount not to exceed five hundred dollars for a second violation of the same offense within a twelve- month period of the date of the first; and (c) a fine in an amount not to exceed seven hundred fifty dollars for the third violation of the same offense within a twelve- month period of the date of the first. The fine for a fourth and subsequent violations of the same offense within a twelve-month period of the date of the first offense shall be one thousand dollars.
Since the first reading of the ordinance, the City Attorney’s office has made minor clarifying edits to the section 12.12.130. These edits replace references to the word “conviction” with “citation” and replace the word “infraction” with “violation” throughout section 12.12.130.
These edits are intended merely to clarify that a violation of the ordinance would be considered an administrative violation and not a criminal offense. These edits do not constitute a substantive change to the ordinance. The attachment “CCMC Altered after Introduction REDLINE” shows the edits made to Section 12.12.130 after the first reading on December 11, 2024, only.
Staff is requesting that the City Council approve the amendments to Title 9 and Title 12 of the Cathedral City Municipal Code by amending Chapters 9.12, 9.14, 12.12, and 12.32. The proposed changes will revise sections relating to driveway width and guidelines for the percentage of the front yard that can be improved as a driveway, introduce civil fines for parking violations, and amend areas designated as no parking areas to include restrictions for parking in front of a mailbox.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no anticipated fiscal impact of an amendment to the CCMC to amend Title 9 and the zoning district regulations to modify the parking standards on residentially zoned property or to amend Title 12 to add civil fines for parking violations and to amend the parking regulations to prohibit parking in front of a mailbox, other than the staff time necessary to prepare an ordinance and staff report.
The regulation of on-street parking would increase the city’s enforcement responsibilities. If the city continues to receive a small number of these complaints annually, their enforcement can be managed on a complaint basis and in a reactive manner with existing resources.
Should the city receive a substantial increase in complaints or if there is a desire for proactive parking enforcement, a reprioritization of existing resources or an allocation of new resources may be required.
FIVE-YEAR STRATEGIC PLAN:
Goal F: Embracing, Inclusive Community Objective:
Cathedral City is valued and respected as a community that welcomes and embraces diversity, has an abundance of high quality and affordable housing options and vibrant businesses. Our neighborhoods are attractive, well-maintained, and issues surrounding homelessness have been compassionately addressed with thoughtful, coordinated, and collaborative programs.
This ordinance will specifically address Action F-2: Prioritize updating the zoning code regarding residential parking and paving provisions, research and give recommendations on enabling parking prohibitions in front of mailboxes.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Current CCMC Referenced Sections
2. CCMC Altered Section 12.12.130 after Introduction REDLINE
3. CCMC Title 9 and Title 12 REDLINE
4. Ordinance No._____
ATTACHMENT 1
Cathedral City Municipal Code Referenced Sections
9.12.100 Access to Parking (Driveways)
All parking spaces and structures shall be served by a driveway that meets the following standards:
A. Minimum width of driveway: sixteen feet;
B. Driveways shall be constructed of Portland cement concrete; and C. Driveways shall not cover more than thirty percent of the required front or street side yard area
(Ord. 256 § 2, 1989; Ord. 862 § 2, 2022)
9.14.090 Parking
In addition to all the requirements of Chapter 9.58, the minimum parking shall be as follows:
A. Main dwelling: two car parking spaces within a garage.
B. Location of parking: no vehicles shall be parked in any area except within the garage, improved driveway, or improved accessory parking spaces.
C. Maximum parking spaces: the maximum number of parking spaces per lot shall not exceed four covered spaces (two hundred square feet each) and open parking not greater than one thousand square feet excluding driveways. Additional covered parking in lieu of said open parking may be permitted by administrative design review provided all other applicable district standards can be met.
D. Vehicles shall not be parked or stored in any front or street side yard area except on driveways or open parking spaces constructed of Portland cement concrete.
Driveways and improved parking areas shall not cover more than fifty percent of the required front or street side yard area.
E. Parking lots, in conjunction with commercial uses, are allowed provided that the parking lot:
1. Solely serves an adjacent commercial development that has frontage along Ramon Road;
2. Shares a common property line or alley (not including a public street) with the commercial development;
3. Does not have vehicular access from an adjacent residential street, unless no other suitable options are available as determined by the city planner;
4. Is not located on a lot that fronts on Roundup Road; and
5. Is not used for any type of storage activity, sales or other non-parking use at any time.
F. For parking lots meeting the above criterion, the following development standards shall apply:
1. A solid decorative masonry wall shall be constructed between the parking lot and the adjacent residential properties. The wall shall be a minimum of six feet and a maximum of seven feet in height. Where the wall is adjacent to a residential front yard setback, the wall height shall step down, starting at the setback line to meet the perimeter screen wall height as described below.
2. A solid decorative masonry screen wall shall be constructed between the parking lot and the adjacent residential street(s) that is a minimum of thirty-six inches and a maximum of forty-eight inches in height. A minimum five-foot interior width planter shall be constructed along both sides of the decorative screen wall.
3. A minimum five-foot interior width planter shall be constructed along the perimeter of the lot where the lot is adjacent to residentially zoned properties.
4. All interior planters shall be protected from vehicle overhangs with concrete wheel stops. Exception: Vehicles may have a two-foot overhang into a planter that has a minimum interior dimension of at least seven feet and concrete wheel stops will not be required.
5. Parking lots shall have a minimum of fifty percent shade coverage of the parking area within ten years of construction. Trees should be planted between every three parking spaces. Arbors, courts and similar shade structures may be approved by the city planner instead of the tree requirement, provided that their supporting members are setback at least five feet from the property line that is shared with residentially zoned properties.
6. Parking lots shall maintain security lighting where a minimum of one footcandle is provided for the interior. Additionally, a maximum of zero footcandles are permitted at all property lines. Fixtures shall be bollard style or wall mounted and shall not exceed five feet in height.
7. Access to the parking lot shall be either from the adjacent commercial use via a common access easement or dedicated easement (a lot merger may be required) or from an adjacent public street or alley. The access shall be designed to city standards as required by the public works director/city engineer.
(Ord. 256 § 4, 1989; Ord. 307 § 3, 1990; Ord. 580 § 3, 2004; Ord. 862 § 2, 2022)
9.14.100 Access to Parking (Driveways)
All parking spaces and structures shall be served by a driveway that meets the following standards:
A. Minimum width of driveway: sixteen feet;
B. Driveways shall be constructed of Portland cement concrete. (Ord. 256 § 4, 1989; Ord. 862 § 2, 2022)
12.32.080 No-Parking Areas
The city traffic engineer is authorized to maintain, by appropriate signs, markings or by paint upon the curb surface, certain no-stopping zones, no-parking areas, and restrictedparking areas, as defined and described in this section. No person shall stop, stand, park or leave standing any vehicle in any of the following places, except when necessary to avoid conflict with other traffic or in compliance with the direction of a police officer or other authorized officer or traffic sign or signal:
A. Within any divisional island unless authorized and clearly indicated with appropriate signs or markings;
B. On either side of any street between the projected property lines of any public walk, public steps, street or thoroughfare terminating at such street, when such area is indicated by appropriate signs or by red paint upon the curb surface; C. In any area where the city traffic engineer determines that the parking or stopping of a vehicle would constitute a traffic hazard or would endanger life or property, when such area is indicated by appropriate signs or by red paint upon the curb surface;
D. In any area established by resolution of the council as a no-parking area, when such area is indicated by appropriate signs or by red paint upon the curb surface; E. In any area where the parking or stopping of any vehicle would constitute a traffic hazard or would endanger life or property;
F. On any street or highway where the use of such street or highway or a portion thereof is necessary for the cleaning, repair or construction of the street or highway or the installation of underground utilities or where the use of the street or highway or any portion thereof is authorized for a purpose other than the normal flow of traffic or where the use of the street or highway or any portion thereof is necessary for the movement of equipment, articles or structures of unusual size, and the parking of such vehicle would prohibit or interfere with such use or movement; provided, that signs giving notice of such no-parking are erected or placed at least twenty-four hours prior to the effective time of such no-parking; G. At any place within twenty feet of a point on the curb immediately opposite the midblock end of a safety zone, when such place is indicated by appropriate signs or by red paint upon the curb surface;
H. At any place within twenty feet of a crosswalk at an intersection when such place is indicated by appropriate signs or by red paint upon the curb surface except that a bus may stop at a designated bus stop;
I. In any area of approach to any traffic signal, left-turn lane, boulevard stop sign or official electric flashing device when such area is determined by the city traffic engineer to be valuable in the interest of promoting traffic safety or convenience, and the area is indicated by appropriate signs or by red paint upon the curb surface that a bus may stop at a designated bus stop.
(Ord. 15 § 1, 1982)
Attachment 2
Altered Section 12.12.130 after Introduction REDLINE
Section 12.12.130 of the Cathedral City Municipal Code identified below was presented to City Council on December 11, 2024, in the proposed ordinance attached to the staff report.
Since the first reading, the City Attorney’s office made minor clarifying edits. Strikethrough text represents removed language. Text in red represents added language. All unmarked text shall remain unchanged.
ADDITION OF SECTION 12.12.130 TO THE CATHEDRAL CITY MUNICIPAL CODE Section 12.12.130 shall be added to Chapter 12.12 of Title 12 of the Cathedral City Municipal Code to read as follows:
12.12.130 Civil fines.
Any person convicted of an infraction shall, for each Each separate parking citation or notice of violation, related to charging violations of local or Vehicle Code regulations governing the parking or standing of vehicles, be subject to: (a) a fine in an amount not to exceed two hundred fifty dollars for a first conviction violation of an offense; (b) a fine in an amount not to exceed five hundred dollars for a second conviction violation of the same offense within a twelve- month period of the date of the first offense; and (c) a fine in an amount not to exceed seven hundred fifty dollars for the third conviction violation of the same offense within a twelve- month period of the date of the first offense. The fine for a fourth and subsequent convictions violations of the same offense within a twelve-month period of the date of the first offense shall be one thousand dollars.
Attachment 3
CCMC Title 9 and Title 12 REDLINE
The sections or subsections of Title 9 and Title 12 of the Cathedral City Municipal Code identified below shall be amended in the manner shown, with red bold italicized text representing added language, strikethrough text representing removed language and bold italicized text representing language that has been moved within the section. All unmarked text shall remain unmodified and in full force and effect:
9.12.100Access to parking (driveways).
All parking spaces and structures shall be served by a driveway that meets the following standards:
A. Minimum width of driveway: sixteen feet;
B. Maximum width of driveway: 36 feet;
C. Driveways shall be constructed of Portland cement concrete or similar durability material approved by the City Engineer; and
D. Driveways and open parking areas shall not cover more than thirty percent of the required front or street side yard area.
9.14.090 Parking
In addition to all the requirements of Chapter 9.58, the minimum parking shall be as follows:
A. Main dwelling: two car parking spaces within a garage.
B. Location of parking: no vehicles shall be parked in any area except within the garage, improved driveway, or improved accessory parking spaces.
C. Maximum parking spaces: the maximum number of parking spaces per lot shall not exceed four covered spaces (two hundred square feet each) and open parking not greater than one thousand square feet excluding driveways.
Additional covered parking in lieu of said open parking may be permitted by administrative design review provided all other applicable district standards can be met.
D. Vehicles shall not be parked or stored in any front or street side yard area except on driveways or open parking spaces constructed of Portland cement concrete or similar durability material approved by the City Engineer. Driveways and improved parking areas shall not cover more than fifty percent of the required front or street side yard area.
E. Parking lots, in conjunction with commercial uses, are allowed provided that the parking lot:
1. Solely serves an adjacent commercial development that has frontage along Ramon Road;
2. Shares a common property line or alley (not including a public street) with the commercial development;
3. Does not have vehicular access from an adjacent residential street, unless no other suitable options are available as determined by the city planner;
4. Is not located on a lot that fronts on Roundup Road; and
5. Is not used for any type of storage activity, sales or other non-parking use at any time.
F. For parking lots meeting the above criterion, the following development standards shall apply:
1. A solid decorative masonry wall shall be constructed between the parking lot and the adjacent residential properties. The wall shall be a minimum of six feet and a maximum of seven feet in height. Where the wall is adjacent to a residential front yard setback, the wall height shall step down, starting at the setback line to meet the perimeter screen wall height as described below.
2. Asolid decorative masonry screen wall shall be constructed between the parking lot and the adjacent residential street(s) that is a minimum of thirty-six inches and a maximum of forty-eight inches in height. A minimum five-foot interior width planter shall be constructed along both sides of the decorative screen wall.
3. Aminimum five-foot interior width planter shall be constructed along the perimeter of the lot where the lot is adjacent to residentially zoned properties.
4. All interior planters shall be protected from vehicle overhangs with concrete wheel stops. Exception: Vehicles may have a two-foot overhang into a planter that has a minimum interior dimension of at least seven feet and concrete wheel stops will not be required.
5. Parking lots shall have a minimum of fifty percent shade coverage of the parking area within ten years of construction. Trees should be planted between every three parking spaces. Arbors, courts and similar shade structures may be approved by the city planner instead of the tree requirement, provided that their supporting members are setback at least five feet from the property line that is shared with residentially zoned properties.
6. Parking lots shall maintain security lighting where a minimum of one footcandle is provided for the interior. Additionally, a maximum of zero footcandles are permitted at all property lines. Fixtures shall be bollard style or wall mounted and shall not exceed five feet in height.
7. Access to the parking lot shall be either from the adjacent commercial use via a common access easement or dedicated easement (a lot merger may be required) or from an adjacent public street or alley. The access shall be designed to city standards as required by the public works director/city engineer.
9.14.100 Access to parking (driveways)
A. Minimum width of driveway: 16 feet;
B. Maximum width of driveway: 36 feet;
C. Driveways and open parking areas shall be constructed of Portland cement concrete or similar durability material approved by the City Engineer; and
D. Driveways and open parking areas shall not cover more than fifty percent of the required front or street side yard area except where a property fronts onto a major or arterial street classification. For properties fronting onto a major or arterial street classification, up to seventy-five percent coverage may be allowed where the City Engineer determines that a turnaround or circular driveway is required or where on-street parking adjacent to the property is prohibited.
12.12.130 Civil fines
Each separate parking citation or notice of violation, related to charging violations of local or Vehicle Code regulations governing the parking or standing of vehicles, shall be subject to: (a) a fine in an amount not to exceed two hundred fifty dollars for a first violation; (b) a fine in an amount not to exceed five hundred dollars for a second violation of the same offense within a twelve- month period of the date of the first; and (c) a fine in an amount not to exceed seven hundred fifty dollars for the third violation of the same offense within a twelve- month period of the date of the first. The fine for a fourth and subsequent violations of the same offense within a twelve-month period of the date of the first offense shall be one thousand dollars.
12.32.080 No-parking areas
The city traffic engineer is authorized to maintain, by appropriate signs, markings or by paint upon the curb surface, certain no-stopping zones, no-parking areas, and restricted- parking areas, as defined and described in this section. No person shall stop, stand, park or leave standing any vehicle in any of the following places, except when necessary to avoid conflict with other traffic or in compliance with the direction of a police officer or other authorized officer or traffic sign or signal:
A. Within any divisional island unless authorized and clearly indicated with appropriate signs or markings;
B. On either side of any street between the projected property lines of any public walk, public steps, street or thoroughfare terminating at such street, when such area is indicated by appropriate signs or by red paint upon the curb surface; C. In any area where the city traffic engineer determines that the parking or stopping of a vehicle would constitute a traffic hazard or would endanger life or property, when such area is indicated by appropriate signs or by red paint upon the curb surface;
D. In any area established by resolution of the council as a no-parking area, when such area is indicated by appropriate signs or by red paint upon the curb surface; E. In any area where the parking or stopping of any vehicle would constitute a traffic hazard or would endanger life or property;
F. On any street or highway where the use of such street or highway or a portion thereof is necessary for the cleaning, repair or construction of the street or highway or the installation of underground utilities or where the use of the street or highway or any portion thereof is authorized for a purpose other than the normal flow of traffic or where the use of the street or highway or any portion thereof is necessary for the movement of equipment, articles or structures of unusual size, and the parking of such vehicle would prohibit or interfere with such use or movement; provided, that signs giving notice of such no-parking are erected or placed at least twenty-four hours prior to the effective time of such no-parking; G. At any place within twenty feet of a point on the curb immediately opposite the midblock end of a safety zone, when such place is indicated by appropriate signs or by red paint upon the curb surface;
H. At any place within twenty feet of a crosswalk at an intersection when such place is indicated by appropriate signs or by red paint upon the curb surface except that a bus may stop at a designated bus stop;
I. In any area of approach to any traffic signal, left-turn lane, boulevard stop sign or official electric flashing device when such area is determined by the city traffic engineer to be valuable in the interest of promoting traffic safety or convenience, and the area is indicated by appropriate signs or by red paint upon the curb surface that a bus may stop at a designated bus stop;
J. In front of, or within ten (10) feet of, any individual mailbox, community mailbox, cluster of mailboxes, or United States postal receptacle available to the public during the hours of eight a.m. to seven p.m. ofthat same day (except Sundaysand federal holidays). The length of time a vehicle is permitted to stop in front of any individual mailbox, community mailbox, cluster of mailboxes, or United States postal receptacle available to the public shall be limited to the time a person is involved in the act of depositing and/or collecting mail in the applicable receptacle.
Attachment 4
ORDINANCE NO.
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF CATHEDRAL CITY, CALIFORNIA,
AMENDING TITLES 9 AND 12 OF THE
CATHEDRAL CITY MUNICIPAL CODE
REGARDING SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
WHEREAS, the City of Cathedral City’s (City) single-family residential development standards for driveway width and landscaping were last amended in 1989; and
WHEREAS, since 1989, changes in state law have fundamentally altered singlefamily residential zoning, including the creation of ministerial and by-right allowances for Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs), Junior Accessory Dwelling Units (JADUs), urban lot splits, and two-family dwelling units; and
WHEREAS, state law restricts local agencies from requiring the replacement of a garage, carport, or covered parking structure when it is demolished in conjunction with the construction of an ADU or JADU and further eliminates parking requirements altogether when an ADU is constructed entirely within an existing residence, when it is proposed as part of an application to build a new single-family dwelling unit; or when an ADU is built within 0.5 miles of public transit; and
WHEREAS, the parking restrictions for urban lot splits and two-family dwelling units are restricted by state law in the same manner as ADUs and JADUs; and WHEREAS, the City permitted 28 ADUs in 2023 and has permitted 30 ADUs through July 2024, demonstrating a significant demand for ADUs within the City; and WHEREAS, 2022 American Community Survey (ACS) 5-Year Estimates for Cathedral City report that 28.6 percent of all households have three or more vehicles, indicating a sizeable number of households have more vehicles than fit in a two-car garage; and
WHEREAS, the City’s single-family residential development standards are not responsive to changes in state law and consumer preferences that have resulted in an increased numbers of vehicles parked on single-family residential property and on residential streets; and
WHEREAS, the increased number of vehicles parked on single-family residential property and residential streets has led to an increase in parking on landscape surfaces and in front of residential mailboxes; and
WHEREAS, the City receives approximately 100 complaints annually from residents concerning the parking on landscape surfaces, which are addressed through the City’s Code Compliance Division; and
WHEREAS, the City receives approximately 5 complaints annually from residents regarding parking in front of a mailbox, including those that have reported the refusal of the USPS to deliver mail when a vehicle is parked blocking a mailbox; and WHEREAS, the increase in single-family residential vehicle parking for properties fronting onto a major or arterial street classification, including Date Palm Drive, Cathedral Canyon, Ramon Road, Vista Chino, and Landau Boulevard, creates added challenges where on-street parking may be restricted or prohibited and where the backing of vehicles from a driveway onto the road may generate safety concerns; and WHEREAS, amendments are needed to the Title 9 of the Cathedral City Municipal Code to provide more flexibility within the single-family residential development standards in response to changes in state law and consumer preferences and to allow for circular driveways and turnarounds in certain circumstances; and WHEREAS, amendments are needed to Title 12 of the Cathedral City Municipal Code to reduce potential conflict with the delivery of USPS mail.
NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CATHEDRAL CITY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. AMENDMENT OF SECTION 9.12.100 OF THE CATHEDRAL CITY
MUNICIPAL CODE
Section 9.12.100 of the Cathedral City Municipal Code shall be repealed in its entirety and replaced to read as follows:
9.12.100 Access to parking (driveways).
All parking spaces and structures shall be served by a driveway that meets the following standards:
A. Minimum width of driveway: 16 feet;
B. Maximum width of driveway: 36 feet;
C. Driveways and open parking areas shall be constructed of Portland cement concrete or similar durability material approved by the City Engineer; and D. Driveways and open parking areas shall not cover more than thirty percent of the required front or street side yard area.
SECTION 2. AMENDMENT OF SECTION 9.14.090 OF THE CATHEDRAL CITY
MUNICIPAL CODE
Section 9.14.090 of the Cathedral City Municipal Code shall be repealed in its entirety and replaced to read as follows:
9.14.090 Parking.
In addition to all the requirements of Chapter 9.58, the minimum parking shall be as follows:
A. Main dwelling: two car parking spaces within a garage.
B. Location of parking: no vehicles shall be parked in any area except within the garage, improved driveway, or improved accessory parking spaces.
C. Maximum parking spaces: the maximum number of parking spaces per lot shall not exceed four covered spaces (two hundred square feet each) and open parking not greater than one thousand square feet excluding driveways.
Additional covered parking in lieu of said open parking may be permitted by administrative design review provided all other applicable district standards can be met.
D. Vehicles shall not be parked or stored in any front or street side yard area except on driveways or open parking spaces constructed of Portland cement concrete or similar durability material approved by the City Engineer. Driveways and improved parking areas shall not cover more than fifty percent of the required front or street side yard area.
E. Parking lots, in conjunction with commercial uses, are allowed provided that the parking lot:
1. Solely serves an adjacent commercial development that has frontage along Ramon Road;
2. Shares a common property line or alley (not including a public street) with the commercial development;
3. Does not have vehicular access from an adjacent residential street, unless no other suitable options are available as determined by the city planner;
4. Is not located on a lot that fronts on Roundup Road; and
5. Is not used for any type of storage activity, sales or other non-parking use at any time.
F. For parking lots meeting the above criterion, the following development standards shall apply:
1. A solid decorative masonry wall shall be constructed between the parking lot and the adjacent residential properties. The wall shall be a minimum of six feet and a maximum of seven feet in height. Where the wall is adjacent to a residential front yard setback, the wall height shall step down, starting at the setback line to meet the perimeter screen wall height as described below.
2. A solid decorative masonry screen wall shall be constructed between the parking lot and the adjacent residential street(s) that is a minimum of thirty-six inches and a maximum of forty-eight inches in height. A minimum five-foot interior width planter shall be constructed along both sides of the decorative screen wall.
3. A minimum five-foot interior width planter shall be constructed along the perimeter of the lot where the lot is adjacent to residentially zoned properties.
4. All interior planters shall be protected from vehicle overhangs with concrete wheel stops. Exception: Vehicles may have a two-foot overhang into a planter that has a minimum interior dimension of at least seven feet and concrete wheel stops will not be required.
5. Parking lots shall have a minimum of fifty percent shade coverage of the parking area within ten years of construction. Trees should be planted between every three parking spaces. Arbors, courts and similar shade structures may be approved by the city planner instead of the tree requirement, provided that their supporting members are setback at least five feet from the property line that is shared with residentially zoned properties.
6. Parking lots shall maintain security lighting where a minimum of one footcandle is provided for the interior. Additionally, a maximum of zero footcandles are permitted at all property lines. Fixtures shall be bollard style or wall mounted and shall not exceed five feet in height.
7. Access to the parking lot shall be either from the adjacent commercial use via a common access easement or dedicated easement (a lot merger may be required) or from an adjacent public street or alley. The access shall be designed to city standards as required by the public works director/city engineer
SECTION 3. AMENDMENT OF SECTION 9.14.100 OF THE CATHEDRAL CITY
MUNICIPAL CODE
Section 9.14.100 of the Cathedral City Municipal Code shall be repealed in its entirety and replaced to read as follows:
9.14.100 Access to parking (driveways).
All parking spaces and structures shall be served by a driveway that meets the following standards:
A. Minimum width of driveway: 16 feet;
B. Maximum width of driveway: 36 feet;
C. Driveways and open parking areas shall be constructed of Portland cement concrete or similar durability material approved by the City Engineer; and D. Driveways and open parking areas shall not cover more than fifty percent of the required front or street side yard area except where a property fronts onto a major or arterial street classification. For properties fronting onto a major or arterial street classification, up to seventy-five percent coverage may be allowed where the City Engineer determines that a turnaround or circular driveway is required or where on-street parking adjacent to the property is prohibited.
SECTION 4. ADDITION OF SECTION 12.12.130 TO THE CATHEDRAL CITY
MUNICIPAL CODE
Section 12.12.130 shall be added to Chapter 12.12 of Title 12 of the Cathedral City Municipal Code to read as follows:
12.12.130 Civil fines.
Each separate parking citation or notice of violation, related to charging violations of local or Vehicle Code regulations governing the parking or standing of vehicles, shall be subject to: (a) a fine in an amount not to exceed two hundred fifty dollars for a first violation; (b) a fine in an amount not to exceed five hundred dollars for a second violation of the same offense within a twelve- month period of the date of the first; and (c) a fine in an amount not to exceed seven hundred fifty dollars for the third violation of the same offense within a twelve- month period of the date of the first. The fine for a fourth and subsequent violations of the same offense within a twelve-month period of the date of the first offense shall be one thousand dollars.
SECTION 5. AMENDMENT OF SECTION 12.32.080 OF THE CATHEDRAL CITY
MUNICIPAL CODE
Section 12.32.080 of the Cathedral City Municipal Code shall be repealed in its entirety and replaced to read as follows:
12.32.080 No-parking areas.
The city traffic engineer is authorized to maintain, by appropriate signs, markings or by paint upon the curb surface, certain no-stopping zones, no-parking areas, and restrictedparking areas, as defined and described in this section. No person shall stop, stand, park or leave standing any vehicle in any of the following places, except when necessary to avoid conflict with other traffic or in compliance with the direction of a police officer or other authorized officer or traffic sign or signal:
A. Within any divisional island unless authorized and clearly indicated with appropriate signs or markings;
B. On either side of any street between the projected property lines of any public walk, public steps, street or thoroughfare terminating at such street, when such area is indicated by appropriate signs or by red paint upon the curb surface; C. In any area where the city traffic engineer determines that the parking or stopping of a vehicle would constitute a traffic hazard or would endanger life or property, when such area is indicated by appropriate signs or by red paint upon the curb surface;
D. In any area established by resolution of the council as a no-parking area, when such area is indicated by appropriate signs or by red paint upon the curb surface; E. In any area where the parking or stopping of any vehicle would constitute a traffic hazard or would endanger life or property;
F. On any street or highway where the use of such street or highway or a portion thereof is necessary for the cleaning, repair or construction of the street or highway or the installation of underground utilities or where the use of the street or highway or any portion thereof is authorized for a purpose other than the normal flow of traffic or where the use of the street or highway or any portion thereof is necessary for the movement of equipment, articles or structures of unusual size, and the parking of such vehicle would prohibit or interfere with such use or movement; provided, that signs giving notice of such no-parking are erected or placed at least twenty-four hours prior to the effective time of such no-parking; G. At any place within twenty feet of a point on the curb immediately opposite the midblock end of a safety zone, when such place is indicated by appropriate signs or by red paint upon the curb surface;
H. At any place within twenty feet of a crosswalk at an intersection when such place is indicated by appropriate signs or by red paint upon the curb surface except that a bus may stop at a designated bus stop;
I. In any area of approach to any traffic signal, left-turn lane, boulevard stop sign or official electric flashing device when such area is determined by the city traffic engineer to be valuable in the interest of promoting traffic safety or convenience, and the area is indicated by appropriate signs or by red paint upon the curb surface that a bus may stop at a designated bus stop;
J. In front of, or within ten (10) feet of, any individual mailbox, community mailbox, cluster of mailboxes, or United States postal receptacle available to the public during the hours of eight a.m. to seven p.m. of that same day (except Sundays and federal holidays). The length of time a vehicle is permitted to stop in front of any individual mailbox, community mailbox, cluster of mailboxes, or United States postal receptacle available to the public shall be limited to the time a person is involved in the act of depositing and/or collecting mail in the applicable receptacle.
SECTION 6. CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA)
Pursuant to Title 14, Chapter 3, Section 15061(b)(3) of the California Code of Regulations, the “common sense exemption” of CEQA Guidelines which states that a “project is exempt from CEQA if: the activity is covered by the common sense exemption that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA.”
SECTION 7. SEVERABILITY
If any chapter, sections, subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portion of this ordinance, is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision will not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this ordinance, and each chapter, sections, subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions thereof be declared invalid or unconstitutional.
SECTION 8. POSTING
The City Clerk shall, within fifteen (15) days after passage of this Ordinance, cause it to be posted in at least three (3) designated public places; shall certify to the adoption and posting of this Ordinance; and shall cause this Ordinance and its certification, together with proof of posting, to be entered in the Book of Ordinances of this City.
SECTION 9. CERTIFICATION
The foregoing Ordinance was approved and adopted at a meeting of the City Council held on the day of , 2025, by the following vote:
Ayes:
Noes:
Abstain:
Absent:
Nancy Ross, Mayor
ATTEST:
Tracey Hermosillo, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Eric S. Vail, City Attorney
Staff Report
City Council
Item No. 3.D
Meeting Date: January 8, 2025
From: Kevin Biersack, Financial Services Director
Title: CFD 2006-1, IA #22 Authorizing the Levy of a Special Tax (2nd Reading RECOMMENDATION:
Conduct Second Reading and adopt the Ordinance authorizing the levy of a special tax within Improvement Area No. 22 of the City of Cathedral City Community Facilities District No. 2006-1 (Law Enforcement, Fire, Paramedic, Park and General Maintenance Services).
BACKGROUND:
On October 9, 2024, the City Council declared its intention to form Improvement Area No. 22 of the City of Cathedral City Community Facilities District (“CFD”) No. 2006-1 (Law Enforcement, Fire, Paramedic, Park and General Maintenance Services) for the purpose of paying for law enforcement, fire, paramedic, park and general maintenance services. These services are in addition to those provided in the territory within the CFD prior to the formation of the CFD, and these services do not supplant services already available within such territory. The CFD was proposed by the property owner of the Wren project.
DISCUSSION:
The City Council held a public hearing on November 13, 2024. During that meeting, the City Council adopted the resolution forming the CFD. In addition, a special election was held to authorize the levy of the special taxes, which passed by more than two-thirds of the votes cast by the qualified voters (the landowners), within the CFD, in favor of the proposition.
Upon canvassing of the results of the special election, the City Council conducted the first reading of an Ordinance authorizing the levy of the special tax. In the case of State budget cuts, the special taxes levied within this CFD provide a secure source of funding for the services that may not be taken away by the State. New developments are conditioned to join the CFD and will join through an annexation process. As new developments go through the approval processes, the annexations will be processed in a timely manner.
FISCAL IMPACT:
For the Wren project, the annual revenue generated by this levy will be $136,578.00 adjusted by the FY 2024/2025 Consumer Price Index (not to exceed 1%).
FIVE-YEAR STRATEGIC PLAN:
This action will further Goal C – Fiscal Stability and Sustainability Objective - Cathedral City has economically prospered by facilitating the investment of private dollars in high quality development which benefits the community. We remain financially solvent by instituting prudent fiscal policies and transparent financial practices.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Cathedral City CFD 2006-1 - Notice of Special Tax Lien IA #22
2. Cathedral City CFD 2006-1 - Ordinance IA #22
3. RMA CFD 2006-1, IA 22
4. Cathedral City CFD 2006-1 Boundary Map - IA 22 (Recorded) 1 RECORDING REQUESTED BY
AND WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO:
City of Cathedral City
68700 Avenida Lalo Guerrero
Cathedral City, California 92234
Attention: Kevin Biersack
______________________________________________________________________________
NOTICE OF SPECIAL TAX LIEN
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 3114.5 of the Streets and Highways Code and Section 53328.3 of the Government Code, the undersigned clerk of the legislative body of the City of Cathedral City (the “City”), State of California, hereby gives notice that a lien to secure payment of special taxes is hereby imposed by the City Council of the City. The special taxes secured by this lien are authorized to be levied for the purpose of financing a portion of the cost of providing law enforcement services, fire protection, paramedic services, park maintenance, and general maintenance services.
The special taxes are authorized to be levied within Improvement Area No. 22 of the City of Cathedral City Community Facilities District No. 2006-1 (Law Enforcement, Fire, Paramedic Park and General Maintenance Services) (“Improvement Area No. 22”) which has now been officially formed and the lien of the special taxes are a continuing lien which shall secure each annual levy of the special taxes and which shall continue in force and effect until the special taxes cease to be levied and a notice of cessation of special taxes is recorded in accordance with Section 53330.5 of the Government Code.
The rate and method of apportionment, and manner of collection of authorized special tax for Improvement Area No. 22 is as set forth in Exhibit “A” attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof. The obligation to pay the special tax may not be prepaid and permanently satisfied and the lien of the special taxes may not be canceled.
Notice is further given that upon the recording of this notice in the office of the county recorder, the obligation to pay the special tax levies shall become a lien upon all real property within Improvement Area No. 22 in accordance with Section 3115.5 of the Streets and Highways Code.
The name of the owner(s) and the assessor’s tax parcel number(s) of the real property included within Improvement Area No. 22 are as set forth in Exhibit “B” attached hereto.
Reference is made to the boundary map of Improvement Area No. 22 recorded at Book 94 of Maps of Assessment and Community Facilities Districts at Page 41, in the office of the County Recorder for the County of Riverside, California which map is now and final boundary map of Improvement Area No. 22.
2 For further information concerning the current and estimated future tax liability of owners or purchasers of real property subject to this special tax lien, interested persons should contact the City Manager of the City of Cathedral City, 68700 Avenida Lalo Guerrero, Cathedral City, California 92234, (760) 770-0340.
Dated: ___________________________ ____________________________________
CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF
CATHEDRAL CITY
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )
On ________________________ before me, ________________________ (here insert name and title of the officer), personally appeared ________________________, personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that she executed the same in her authorized capacity, and that by her signature on the instrument the person, or the entity upon which the person acted, executed the instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Signature ________________________________ (SEAL)
EXHIBIT A
RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT
EXHIBIT B
PROPERTY OWNER NAME AND ASSESSOR’S TAX PARCEL NUMBER
Property Owner APNs
Coachella Valley Community 670-110-043
Development Group
ORDINANCE NO. _____
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CATHEDRAL CITY ACTING AS THE LEGISLATIVE BODY FOR
IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 22 OF THE CITY OF CATHEDRAL CITY
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2006-1 (LAW
ENFORCEMENT, FIRE, PARAMEDIC, PARK AND GENERAL
MAINTENANCE SERVICES) AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A
SPECIAL TAX
WHEREAS, on October 9, 2024 the City Council (the “Council”) of the City of Cathedral City, California (the “City”) adopted Resolution No. 2024-40 stating its intention to form the Improvement Area No. 22 of the City of Cathedral City Community Facilities District No. 2006-1 (Law Enforcement, Fire, Paramedic, Park and General Maintenance Services) (the “District”) pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, as amended, (the “Act”); and
WHEREAS, notice was published as required by law relative to the intention of the Council to form the District; and
WHEREAS, on November 13, 2024 this Council held a noticed public hearing as required by law relative to the determination to proceed with the formation of the District and the rate and method of apportionment and manner of collection of the special tax to be levied within the District to finance certain public services; and
WHEREAS, at said hearing all persons desiring to be heard on all matters pertaining to the formation of the District were heard and a full and fair hearing was held; and WHEREAS, the Council subsequent to said hearing adopted Resolution No. 2024-43 (the “Resolution of Formation”) on November 13, 2024 determining the validity of prior proceedings relative to the formation of the District and establishing the District; and WHEREAS, the Council subsequent to said hearing adopted Resolution No. 2024-44 which called an election within the District for November 13, 2024 on the proposition of levying a special tax; and
WHEREAS, the Council subsequent to said hearing adopted Resolution No. 2024-45 on November 13, 2024 which held an election within the District and canvassed the results in which the eligible electors approved by more than two-thirds vote the proposition of levying a special tax;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED, by the City Council of the City of Cathedral City as follows:
Section 1. A special tax is levied within the boundaries of the District pursuant to the formula set forth in Exhibit “A” attached hereto and incorporated by reference in an amount necessary to finance a portion of the cost of providing police protection, fire protection, paramedic, park maintenance and general maintenance services that are in addition to those provided in the territory within the District prior to the formation of the District.
Section 2. This legislative body is hereby further authorized to provide, by resolution adopted as provided in Section 53340 of the Act, for the levy of the special tax in the then current tax year or future tax years, except that the special tax rates to be levied shall not exceed the maximum rates set forth in Exhibit “A”.
Section 3. All of the collections of the special tax shall be used as provided for in the Act and the Resolution of Formation.
Section 4. The above authorized special tax shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem taxes are collected and shall be subject to the same penalties and the same procedure and sale in cases of delinquency and provided for ad valorem taxes.
Section 5. The Mayor shall sign this ordinance and the City Clerk shall attest to such signature. The City Clerk is directed to cause the title and summary or text of the this ordinance, together with the vote thereon, to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in a newspaper of general circulation published and circulated within the territorial jurisdiction of the City, and to post at the main office of the City a certified copy of the full text of the adopted ordinance along with the names of the Council Members voting for and against the ordinance.
Section 6. This ordinance relating to the levy of the special tax takes effect and shall be in force from and after 30 days from the date of final passage. A copy of this ordinance shall be transmitted to the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of Riverside County, the Assessor and the Treasurer-Tax Collector of Riverside County.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this ________ day of ______________, 2024 by the following votes:
AYES:
NOES:
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________
CITY ATTORNEY
REVIEWED:
_____________________________
CITY MANAGER
EXHIBIT A
RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT
City of Cathedral City August 22, 2024
IA No. 22 of CFD No. 2006-1 (The Wren) Page 1
RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT FOR
IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 22 OF
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2006-1
(THE WREN)
OF THE CITY OF CATHEDRAL CITY
A Special Tax as hereinafter defined shall be levied on all Assessor’s Parcels in Improvement Area No. 22 (“IA No. 22”) of Community Facilities District No. 2006-1 of the City of Cathedral City ("CFD No. 2006-1") and collected each Fiscal Year commencing in Fiscal Year 2024-2025, in an amount determined by the Council through the application of the appropriate Special Tax for "Developed Property" as described below. All of the real property in IA No. 22, unless exempted by law or by the provisions hereof, shall be taxed for the purposes, to the extent and in the manner herein provided.
A. DEFINITIONS
The terms hereinafter set forth have the following meanings:
"Acre" or "Acreage" means the land area of an Assessor’s Parcel as shown on an Assessor's Parcel Map, or if the land area is not shown on an Assessor's Parcel Map, the land area shown on the applicable final map, parcel map, condominium plan, or other recorded County parcel map.
"Act" means the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, as amended, being Chapter 2.5, Division 2 of Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California. "Administrative Expenses" means the following actual or reasonably estimated costs directly related to the administration of IA No. 22: the costs of computing the Special Taxes and preparing the annual Special Tax collection schedules (whether by the City or designee thereof or both); the costs of collecting the Special Taxes (whether by the County or otherwise); the costs to the City, IA No. 22 or any designee thereof of complying with City or IA No. 22 disclosure requirements; the costs associated with responding to public inquiries regarding the Special Taxes; the costs of the City, IA No. 22 or any designee thereof related to an appeal of the Special Tax; and the City’s annual administration fees and third party expenses. Administrative Expenses shall also include amounts estimated or advanced by the City or IA No. 22 for any other administrative purposes of IA No. 22, including attorney’s fees and other costs related to commencing and pursuing to completion any foreclosure of delinquent Special Taxes. "Assessor's Parcel Map" means an official map of the Assessor of the County designating parcels by Assessor's Parcel number.
"CFD Administrator" means an official of the City, or designee thereof, responsible for the annual administration of IA No. 22 as provided herein.
City of Cathedral City August 22, 2024
IA No. 22 of CFD No. 2006-1 (The Wren) Page 2
"CFD No. 2006-1" means Community Facilities District No. 2006-1 of the City. "City" means the City of Cathedral City.
"Consumer Price Index" means the Consumer Price Index published by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics for "All Urban Consumers" in the Los Angeles - Anaheim - Riverside Area, measured as of the month of December in the calendar year which ends in the previous Fiscal Year. In the event this index ceases to be published, the Consumer Price Index shall be another index as determined by the CFD Administrator that is reasonably comparable to the Consumer Price Index for the City of Los Angeles. "Council" means the City Council of the City, acting as the legislative body of CFD No. 2006-1.
"County" means the County of Riverside.
"Developed Property" means, for each Fiscal Year, all Taxable Property for which a building permit for new construction was issued after March 1, 2024 and prior to May 1 of the previous Fiscal Year.
"Fiscal Year" means the period starting July 1 and ending on the following June 30. "Floor Area" for any Non-Residential Property means the total square footage of the building(s) located on such property, measured from outside wall to outside wall, exclusive of overhangs, porches, patios, carports, or similar spaces attached to the building but generally open on at least two sides. The determination of Floor Area shall be made by reference to the building permit(s) issued for such Assessor’s Parcel. "Improvement Area No. 22" means Improvement Area No. 22 of CFD No. 2006-1 (The Wren), as identified on the boundary map for CFD No. 2006-1. "Land Use Class" means any of the classes listed in Table 1. "Maximum Special Tax" means the Maximum Special Tax, determined in accordance with Section C.1 below, which can be levied in any Fiscal Year on any Assessor’s Parcel. "Non-Residential Property" means all Assessor’s Parcels for which a building permit(s) was issued for a non-residential use.
"Non-Retail Commercial/Industrial Property" means all Assessor’s Parcels of Developed Property that are considered Non-Residential Property and that are not Retail Commercial Property.
"Property Owner Association Property" means, for each Fiscal Year, any Assessor’s Parcel within the boundaries of IA No. 22 that was owned by or irrevocably offered for City of Cathedral City August 22, 2024
IA No. 22 of CFD No. 2006-1 (The Wren) Page 3
dedication to a property owner association, including any master or sub-association, as of January 1 of the previous Fiscal Year.
"Public Property" means, for each Fiscal Year, (i) any property within the boundaries of IA No. 22 that was owned by or irrevocably offered for dedication to the federal government, the State, the City or any other public agency as of January 1 of the previous Fiscal Year; provided however that any property leased by a public agency to a private entity and subject to taxation under Section 53340.1 of the Act shall be taxed and classified in accordance with its use; or (ii) any property within the boundaries of IA No. 22 that was encumbered, as of January 1 of the previous Fiscal Year, by an unmanned utility easement making impractical its utilization for other than the purpose set forth in the easement.
"Residential Property" means all Assessor’s Parcels of Developed Property for which a building permit has been issued for purposes of constructing one or more residential dwelling units.
"Retail Commercial Property" means all Assessor’s Parcels of Non-Residential Property for which the building permit was issued for a retail sales tax generating use or which is being used primarily for a retail sales tax generating use, as determined by the CFD Administrator. However, if the land use of an Assessor’s Parcel changes and such Assessor’s Parcel no longer generates retail sales tax, such Assessor’s Parcel shall no longer be considered Retail Commercial Property and shall be classified and taxed according to its use, as determined by the CFD Administrator. "Special Tax" means the special tax to be levied in each Fiscal Year on each Assessor's Parcel of Developed Property.
"State" means the State of California.
"Taxable Property" means all of the Assessor's Parcels within the boundaries of IA No. 22 which are not exempt from the Special Tax pursuant to law or Section E below. "Undeveloped Property" means, for each Fiscal Year, all Taxable Property not classified as Developed Property.
"Welfare Exemption" means, for each Fiscal Year, any Assessor's Parcel that is used exclusively for charitable, hospital, or religious purposes and that has a property tax welfare exemption as indicated in the County’s assessor’s roll finalized as of the last preceding January 1.
B. ASSIGNMENT TO LAND USE CATEGORIES
Each Fiscal Year, all Taxable Property within IA No. 22 shall be classified as Developed Property or Undeveloped Property and shall be subject to Special Taxes in accordance City of Cathedral City August 22, 2024
IA No. 22 of CFD No. 2006-1 (The Wren) Page 4
with the rate and method of apportionment determined pursuant to Section C.
Residential Property shall be assigned to Land Use Class 1. Non-Retail Commercial/Industrial Property shall be assigned to Land Use Class 2.
C. MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX
1. Developed Property
a. Maximum Special Tax
The Maximum Special Tax for Fiscal Year 2024-2025 for each Land Use Class is shown below in Table 1.
TABLE 1
Maximum Special Tax for Developed Property
For Fiscal Year 2024-2025
Improvement Area No. 22
Land Use Class Description Maximum Special Tax
1 Residential Property $669.50 per unit
2 Non-Retail
Commercial/Industrial Property
$0.1556 per square foot of Floor
Area
b. Increase in the Maximum Special Tax
On each July 1, commencing on July 1, 2025, the Maximum Special Tax shall be increased (but not decreased) by the percentage change in the Consumer Price Index not to exceed one percent (1%) per Fiscal Year.
c. Multiple Land Use Classes
In some instances an Assessor’s Parcel of Developed Property may contain more than one Land Use Class. The Maximum Special Tax that can be levied on an Assessor’s Parcel shall be the sum of the Maximum Special Taxes that can be levied for all Land Use Classes located on that Assessor’s Parcel.
2. Undeveloped Property
No Special Tax shall be levied on Undeveloped Property.
City of Cathedral City August 22, 2024
IA No. 22 of CFD No. 2006-1 (The Wren) Page 5
D. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF THE SPECIAL TAX
Commencing with Fiscal Year 2024-2025 and for each following Fiscal Year, the Council shall levy the Special Tax on each Assessor’s Parcel of Developed Property at 100% of the applicable Maximum Special Tax.
E. EXEMPTIONS
No Special Tax shall be levied on Retail Commercial Property, Property Owner Association Property, Public Property, or any Assessor’s Parcel that has a Welfare Exemption. However, should an Assessor’s Parcel no longer be classified as Retail Commercial Property, Property Owner Association Property, Public Property, or have a Welfare Exemption, its tax-exempt status will, without the necessity of any action by the Council, terminate.
F. APPEALS AND INTERPRETATIONS
Any landowner or resident may file a written appeal of the Special Tax on his/her property with the CFD Administrator, provided that the appellant is current in his/her payments of Special Taxes. During the pendency of an appeal, all Special Taxes previously levied must be paid on or before the payment date established when the levy was made. The appeal must specify the reasons why the appellant claims the Special Tax is in error. The CFD Administrator shall review the appeal, meet with the appellant if the CFD Administrator deems necessary, and advise the appellant of its determination. If the CFD Administrator agrees with the appellant, the CFD Administrator shall eliminate or reduce the Special Tax on the appellant’s property and/or provide a refund to the appellant. If the CFD Administrator disagrees with the appellant and the appellant is dissatisfied with the determination, the appellant then has 30 days in which to appeal to the Council by filing a written notice of appeal with the City Clerk, provided that the appellant is current in his/her payments of Special Taxes. The second appeal must specify the reasons for its disagreement with the CFD Administrator’s determination.
Interpretations may be made by the Council by ordinance or resolution for purposes of clarifying any vagueness or ambiguity in this Rate and Method of Apportionment.
G. MANNER OF COLLECTION
The Special Tax shall be collected in the same manner and at the same time as ordinary ad valorem property taxes; provided, however, that IA No. 22 may directly bill the Special Tax, may collect Special Taxes at a different time or in a different manner if necessary to meet its financial obligations, and may covenant to foreclose and may actually foreclose on delinquent Assessor’s Parcels as permitted by the Act.
City of Cathedral City August 22, 2024
IA No. 22 of CFD No. 2006-1 (The Wren) Page 6
H. TERM OF SPECIAL TAX
The Council is authorized to levy the Special Tax in perpetuity.
SHEET 1 OF 1
DRIVE
PALM
DATE
30TH
HHHHHHH
AVENUE
Assessor Parcel within
HHHH
Improvement Area No. 22:
670-110-043
ROSEMOUNT SIERRA PL. ROAD
DRIVE
ALEXANDER
PROPOSED BOUNDARIES OF
IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 22
OF CITY OF CATHEDRAL CITY
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2006-1
(THE WREN)
WINTER DRIVE
Prepared by DTA
DRIVE
WINTER
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
ROSEMOUNT
LEGEND
Reference is hereby made to the Assessor maps of the County of Riverside for a description of the lines and dimensions of
each lot and parcel.
AVE. SANELJAY
Proposed Boundaries of
Improvement Area No. 22
of City of Cathedral City
Community Facilities District No. 2006-1
Assessor Parcel Line
ROAD
uAYAVE
(1) Filed in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Cathedral City this qth_ day of Dtober
By
(2) I hereby certify that the within map showing the proposed boundaries of Improvement Area No. 22 of City of Cathedral City Community Facilities District No. 2006-1 (The Wren), Riverside County, State of California, was approved by the City Council at a regular meeting thereof, held on this th day of totobor 2024, by its Resolution No.
2024-40
CopY
Tracey R. Hermosillo, CMC, City Clerk of Cathedral City Tracey R. Hermosillo, CMC, City Clerk of Cathedral City (3) Filed this I7+h day of October 2024, at the hour of 10:47 o'clock am, in Book 94 of Maps of Assessment and
Community Facilities Districts at page 41 and as Instrument No. 024-0312088 in the office of the County Recorder of Assessor-County Clerk-Recorder of Riverside County
Peter Aldana
Fee # 9-00
2024.
Deputy
q4
Riverside County, State of California.
Staff Report
City Council
Item No. 3.E
Meeting Date: January 8, 2025
From: John A. Corella, Director of Public Works
Title: Notice of Completion for the Tropical Storm Hilary - Soil Removal for Ofelia Bringas Memorial Bridge Grade Control Structure and Date Palm Drive Channel Lining Project
RECOMMENDATION:
To accept and approve the Tropical Storm Hilary - Soil Removal for Ofelia Bringas Memorial Bridge Grade Control Structure (City Project No. M00023) and Date Palm Drive Bridge Channel Lining (City Project No. M00025) as complete; authorize the City Manager to execute and file a notice of completion with the Riverside County Recorder’s Office; and authorize the release of retention funds to Contera Construction Corporation upon expiration of the notice of completion.
BACKGROUND:
On June 26, 2024, the City Council approved a construction contract with Contera Construction Corporation in the amount of $2,690,521.00 with a fifteen percent (15%) contingency of $403,578 for unforeseen construction costs, thereby making the total construction budget a total of $3,094,099.15.
This project is a continuation of the city’s efforts and response to the Tropical Storm Hilary event on August 20, 2023. The project consisted of the removal and disposal of soil material deposited onto the Ofelia Bringas Memorial Bridge and Date Palm Drive Bridge channel drop structures.
DISCUSSION:
The soil removal work for the project started on August 14, 2024, and was completed on October 31, 2024.
City staff reviewed and inspected the areas affected by Tropical Storm Hilary and found the soil removal work of these areas was performed in accordance with all the contract documents. City staff are recommending the City Council accept the project as complete.
City Council acceptance is required to approve the project’s final contract amount and release retention funds. Retention funds are monies earned by the contractor withheld from progress payments pending satisfactory completion and final acceptance of the project.
City Council acceptance of the project requires a notice of completion (NOC) be filed with the Riverside County Recorder’s Office. The NOC is a written notice issued by the owner of the project, or their agent, to notify concerned parties that all work on the project has been completed. This notice also sets the period, which is thirty-five (35) days from the date the NOC is filed, within which concerned parties may exercise their lien rights against one another. Once the thirty-five-day period has expired, and provided no claims or liens are received, the City can release retention funds.
City staff recommends the City Council accept and approve the Tropical Storm Hilary - Soil Removal for Ofelia Bringas Memorial Bridge Grade Control Structure (City Project No.
M00023) and Date Palm Drive Bridge Channel Lining (City Project No. M00025) as complete; authorize the City Manager to execute and file a notice of completion with the Riverside County Recorder’s Office; and authorize the release of retention funds to Contera Construction Corporation upon expiration of the notice of completion.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The fiscal impact for the construction of the Tropical Storm Hilary - Soil Removal for Ofelia Bringas Memorial Bridge Grade Control Structure and Date Palm Drive Bridge Channel Lining Project was approved as follows:
Construction Funding
FISCAL
YEAR
DESCRIPTION GENERAL
LEDGER
ACCOUNT
CODES
PROJECT
CODE
AMOUNT ONE TIME
or
ONGOING
2024-2025 Tropical Storm Hilary Soil
Removal Project Fund
100-900-910-
911-8300-8301
M00023/
M00025 $2,690,521.00 ONE TIME
2024-2025 Tropical Storm Hilary Soil
Removal Project Fund
100-900-910-
911-8300-8301
M00023/
M00025 $ 403,578.15 ONE TIME
2024-2025 Total $3,094,099.15
Construction Contract Cost
The construction expenditures with Contera Construction Corporation were in the amount of $1,596,586.21 which includes change orders in the amount of $80,647.23. The final contract cost is summarized below:
Construction Expenditures $1,515,938.98
Change Orders $ 80,647.23
Final Construction Contract Cost $1,596,586.21
The final invoice (5% retention) in the amount of $79,829.31 will be released to Contera Construction Corporation thirty-five (35) days from the date the NOC is filed should there be no claims or discrepancies in the work completed.
FIVE-YEAR STRATEGIC PLAN:
GOAL B: COMMUNITY INVESTMENT
Objective: Cathedral City roads, gateways, public spaces, and other city infrastructure are well planned, designed, constructed, and maintained.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Notice of Completion – Contera Construction Corporation (“President of,” “Manager of,” “A partner of,” “Owner of,” etc.)
RECORDING REQUESTED BY
AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:
Name
Street
Address
City &
State
SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER’S USE ONLY
NOTICE OF COMPLETION
Notice is hereby given that:
1. The undersigned is owner or corporate officer of the owner of the interest or estate stated below in the property hereinafter described:
2. The full name of the owner is
3. The full address of the owner is
4. The nature of the interest or estate of the owner is in fee. (If other than fee, strike “in Fee” and insert, for example, “purchaser under contract of purchase,” or “lessee”)
5. The full names and full addresses of all persons, if any, who hold title with the undersigned as joint tenants or as tenants in common are:
NAMES ADDRESSES
6. A work of improvement on the property hereinafter described was completed on . The work done was:
7. The name of the contractor, if any, for such work of improvement was (If no contractor for work of improvement as a whole, insert “none”) (Date of Contract)
8. The property on which said work of improvement was completed is in the city of , County of , State of California, and is described as follows:
9. The street address of said property is
(If no street address has been officially assigned, insert “none”) Dated:
Signature of owner of corporate officer of owner
named in paragraph 2 or his agent
VERIFICATION
I, the undersigned, say: I am the the declarant of the foregoing notice of completion; I have read said notice of completion and know the contents thereof; the same is true of my own knowledge.
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed on , 20 , at , California.
(Date of signature) (City where signed)
(Personal signature of the individual who is swearing that the contents of the notice of completion are true)
SRU PAGE SIZE DA MISC LONG RFD COPY
MA L 465 426 PCOR NCOR SMF NCHG
T: CTY UNI
EXAM
http://www/riversideacr.com/acr/forms/Notice%20of%Completion 06/22/2011 Charles P. McClendon
City Manager, City of Cathedral City
EXEMPT RECORDING FEES PURSUANT TO
CODE SECTION 6130 AND 2733
Charles P. McClendon,
City Manager, City of Cathedral City
City of Cathedral City
Tracey Hermosillo, City Clerk
68700 Ave. Lalo Guerrero
Cathedral City
CA 92234
City of Cathedral City
68-700 Avenida Lalo Guerrero, Cathedral City, CA 92234
None
11/01/2024
Tropical Storm Hilary-Soil Removal for Ofelia Bringas Memorial Bridge Grade Control Structure and Date Palm Drive Bridge Channel Lining Project
Contera Construction Corporation
Cathedral City
Riverside Removal and disposal of soil material
deposited during the Tropical Storm Hilary event at the Ofelia Bringas Memorial Bridge grade control structure and Date Palm Drive Bridge channel lining.
01/08/2025
City Manager for the City of Cathedral City
25 Cathedral City
none
Staff Report
City Council
Item No. 4.A
Meeting Date: January 8, 2025
From: Andrew Firestine, Community and Economic Development Director Title: General Plan Amendment 23-002, Change of Zone 23-001 and Design Review 23-002 for Development of a 204-unit Apartment Community.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council take the following actions based on the Planning Commission’s adoption of Resolution PC 2024-05, recommending approval of the Project:
1. Adopt the mitigated negative declaration and mitigation monitoring and reporting plan prepared for the project based on the findings contained in the staff report; and
2. Adopt a resolution approving General Plan Amendment 23-002 to amend the General Plan land use designation from general commercial to medium high density residential (11- 20 dwelling units per acre), based on the findings and conclusions contained in the resolution and staff report; and
3. Adopt an ordinance approving Change of Zone 23-001 amending the Zoning Map to change the zone district from Planned Community Commercial to Multiple-family Residential (R3), based on the findings and conclusions contained in the ordinance and staff report; and
4. Approve Design Review 23-002 to construct a 204-unit apartment project, based on the findings and conclusions contained in the staff report and subject to the attached conditions of approval.
FINDINGS:
Adopt the mitigated negative declaration based on the following findings and attached mitigated negative declaration:
1. The record as a whole, including the initial study and any comments received, demonstrates that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment with the implementation of the mitigation measures; and
2. The mitigated negative declaration reflects the lead agency’s independent judgment and analysis; and
3. In accordance with Section 15074, Chapter 3, Title 14, of the California Code of Regulations (State CEQA Guidelines), the mitigation monitoring and reporting program contained in the draft initial study and mitigated negative declaration, dated October 2024, shall serve as the City’s reporting program for monitoring the mitigation measures specified in the mitigated negative declaration.
Adopt a resolution approving General Plan Amendment 23-002 to amend the land use map designation from general commercial to medium high density residential (11-20 du/ac) based on the following findings and outlined in the staff report:
1.The General Plan anticipates periodic revision to ensure City ordinances and policies are maintained in conformance with the General Plan; and
2. The proposed General Plan Amendment would provide additional land designated for housing in accordance with Housing Element Policy 1.A that seeks to ensure the City has sufficient residentially designated land and appropriate zoning exists to meet the City’s housing needs; and
3. The proposed General Plan Amendment will allow for infill housing development within already urbanized areas of the corporate boundaries of the City consistent with Administration Policy 7 of the General Plan; and
4. The proposed General Plan Amendment is consistent with Policy 3 of the Economic and Fiscal Health Element to encourage higher density infill development which uses existing utilities, infrastructure, and services; and
5. The proposed General Plan Amendment is consistent with Action F-7 of the City’s Strategic Plan to support diverse, accessible, and affordable housing; and
6. Adoption of this General Plan Amendment is not in conflict with Section 65358(b) of the California Government Code relating to the number of amendments permitted per year, because this amendment is the second amendment of calendar year 2024.
Adopt an ordinance to enact the Change of Zone 23-001 from Planned Community Commercial to Multiple-family Residential (R3), based on the following findings:
1. The proposed change of zone is in conformity with the general plan land use map, as amended, and the lot area development standard for the proposed zone is the same as the lot area designated on the general plan map for the property subject to the proposed General Plan Amendment and zone change; and
2. The subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in terms of access, size and shape of parcel, relationship to similar or related uses, and other considerations deemed relevant by the Commission and Council as the project is consistent with applicable zoning standards; and
3. The proposed change of zone to permit the project is desirable for the development of the community in that it allows diverse housing types and tenure for local residents and workforce, is in harmony with the Housing, Administration, and Land Use Elements or objectives in the General Plan, and is not detrimental to existing uses or to uses specifically permitted in the R3 Zoning District; and
Approve Design Review 23-002, based on the following findings:
1. The project is consistent with the proposed Multiple-family Residential (R3) designation which provides for appropriately located areas for multiple-family dwellings at a medium to high range of population density, and to provide space for community facilities needed to complement urban residential areas; and
2. Architectural considerations including height, bulk, area, color, materials, height, variations, elevations, screening, and other physical features meet the minimum requirements of the Code; and
3. The project’s proposed landscaping and site treatment including planting elements and site treatment and open space provisions create an attractive and inviting environment for residents; and
4. Site plan analysis including traffic and pedestrian circulation, safety considerations, parking and provision of services contribute to overall safety for residents, visitors, and the general community; and
5. In accordance with Section 15074, Chapter 3, Title 14, of the California Code of Regulations (State CEQA Guidelines), a mitigated negative declaration has been prepared which considered potential environmental impacts of the project and incorporated measures to mitigate potential significant impacts to levels below significance; and
6. The applicant agrees to comply with all conditions of approval attached to this staff report.
BACKGROUND:
The applicant, Stefan Vogel, submitted Design Review 23-002, Change of Zone 23-001, and General Plan Amendment 23-002 applications on October 19, 2023, for the development of a 204-unit residential apartment complex on an approximately 10.48-acre vacant parcel (Assessor Parcel Number 670-110-043) located in the PCC (Planned Community Commercial) Zoning District. The project includes applications for a proposed change of zoning to R3 (Multi-family Residential) along with a General Plan Amendment to change the designation in the Land Use Element and Map from CG (General Commercial) to RMH – Medium High Density Residential (11-20 dwelling units per acre). Consistent with the proposed R3 zone change, the project was reviewed for consistency with the proposed R3 zoning. An initial study/mitigated negative declaration was also prepared for the project.
The Architectural Review Committee (ARC) reviewed and recommended approval of the architectural and landscape elements of the proposal on October 16, 2024. The Planning Commission (PC) reviewed and recommended approval of the project. The PC adopted Resolution PC 2024-05 recommending City Council adopt the mitigated negative declaration, adopt a resolution to approve the General Plan Amendment, adopt an Ordinance to change the zoning, and approve the Design Review. The adopted PC resolution included a scrivener’s error in referencing the proposed General Plan Land Use Map as “RH” or “High density residential”; the correct reference should be “RMH” which is “Medium high density residential”. This error does not impact the analysis, the findings, or the recommendations.
The incorrect references to RH have been changed to RMH accordingly.
The site is located on the east side of Date Palm Drive, immediately south of the Northgate Community Church, and north of the Rosemount Road extension. The site is relatively flat, with neighboring single-family residences zoned R1 to the east. The Rosemount Road planned extension will form the southern boundary. Properties to the south include a mix of existing single-family residences (R1) and the vacant property sited for the proposed Rosemount Storage project. The west side of Date Palm Drive is vacant and zoned PCC (Planned Community Commercial). The property is separated from Northgate Community Church by an existing access drive that traverses the church parking area and ends at 30th Avenue.
The 204-unit residential apartment complex consists of 12 individual buildings that are either 2- or 3-story and contain a mix of 1-, 2-, and 3-bedroom units, all with patios or balconies, and half of the units with direct-access garages. The fully enclosed site includes 2 access gates, covered parking including 8 EV charging stalls, a central clubhouse/postal center, swimming pool, and kids/community green.
Off-site improvements include the construction of Rosemount Road and associated sidewalk and landscaping. In addition, the access road around the Northgate Church (the Church) property is being developed under a shared access agreement between the project applicant and the Church. The applicant will complete the private drive segment between the existing drive along the southern boundary and the existing drive along the eastern boundary of the Church property. The new access will allow for project residents to access either Date Palm Drive or 30th Avenue along the outside perimeter of the Church property (see also Attachment 4. Site – Church map). Additional offsite improvements include the installation of 6 streetlights on Date Palm Drive and Rosemount Road, and street trees along Date Palm Drive. Improvements to the shared access drive will include landscaping, and lighting applying to the full length along the northern boundary with the Church. A pedestrian gate will be added to the perimeter fence near the northwest corner along the shared access to allow residents convenient walking access to Date Palm Drive.
The intersection of Rosemount Road and Date Palm Drive will eventually be signalized. The timing of the installation of the traffic signal will be coordinated with adjacent development projects. Generally, the first development to be constructed will install the signal. The off-site and intersection improvements are detailed in the attached Conditions of Approval.
DISCUSSION:
General Plan and Zoning Analysis
The General Plan (GP) Land Use Element and the Land Use Map describe and designate the distribution of land uses by type, location, and intensity. Consistent with state law, the General Plan allows amendment of GP elements up to four times in a calendar year. The GP recognizes continuous evaluation of the elements and plans contained within it, and periodic amending may be necessary. The Land Use Element along with other GP Elements support and encourage integrated mixed-use development and where appropriate will facilitate opportunities for higher density development to facilitate the sustainability strategy, stating an intent to promote urban development that is compact with more opportunity for greater residential density integrated with mixed-use and neighborhood-serving commercial services, with an aim at creating new walkable neighborhoods.
The area has developed and continues to develop in a mixed-density pattern with a variety of use types including both residential and commercial (area map attached). Area services include 2 public schools within a 5-minute walk. Amending the GP Land Use Map to RMH supports the existing development patterns in the immediate area.
The General Plan provides for periodic review and amendment ensuring concurrency with changing conditions and that it continues to reflect the goals of the community. The General Plan Housing Element Policy 1.A seeks to ensure that sufficient residentially designated lands and appropriate zoning exist to meet the City’s future housing needs, further specifying maintaining land use and zoning designations in the General Plan and zoning maps that allow for diversity of housing types and densities (Program 1.A.2). The proposal would provide additional land for housing development at a higher density. The proposal offers a mix of unit sizes.
Administration Policy 7 of the General Plan states the City shall encourage infill development within already urbanized areas of the corporate boundaries of the city and aligns with the City’s Strategic Plan Action F-7 to support diverse, accessible, and affordable housing. If approved, the proposal will permit multi-family housing development in an area with access to amenities and services including roads, utilities, and transit.
The General Plan Land Use Map currently identifies the project site as CG – General Commercial; the application proposal seeks to amend this category to RMH – Medium High Density Residential (11-20 units per acre).
The proposal meets the criteria for a change of zone. The proposed change is in conformity with the General Plan land use map, if amended. The change of zone from PCC – Planned Community Commercial to R3 – Multiple-family Residential is consistent with the proposed General Plan Amendment. The project property is suitable for the proposed uses in terms of access, size, and relationship to related uses. The proposed change of zone is not likely to be detrimental to the adjacent property or residents.
The R3 zone district allows for multiple family uses of densities of up to 20 units per acre, and also establishes development standards related to R3 development. The project is consistent with the proposed R3 zone as discussed below.
Design Review - Residential Units
Multiple-family dwellings are permitted uses in the R3 zone, subject to Design Review. The R3 zone allows density at the medium-high range, of 11-20 dwelling units per acre. The proposed density is 19.5 units per acre. The apartment complex will offer two building types referred to as “The Big House” (2-story) and “The Stack House” (3-story). The site will include six of each of these building types. The 3-story Stack House buildings will occupy the areas adjacent to Date Palm Drive and south of the Church. The 2-story Big House will occupy the area closer to the existing single-family residential. The Big House buildings consist of 10 units ranging from 950 to 1,415 square feet distributed as 2 1- bedroom, 4 2-bedroom, and 4 3-bedroom units; the Stack House buildings consist of 24 units ranging from 750 to 1,114 square feet distributed as 6 1-bedroom and 18 2-bedroom units. All units in the Big House buildings have direct access to a private garage; 7 units in each Stack House building will have direct access to private garages. The units will be market- rate rental apartments.
Site Plan Analysis
The proposed project design complies with all the R3 zone development standards including building height, setbacks, open space and landscaping, and parking.
The zoning code requires 15-foot front yard, 5-foot side yard, and 15-foot rear yard setbacks, with no more than 60% lot coverage. There is an existing 6-foot high block wall along the eastern property boundary adjacent to existing single-family residences. The proposed buildings are setback a minimum of 77 ½ feet from the eastern property line at building #4, which is the building closest to the eastern property line. A retention basin is proposed between the eastern property line and the apartment buildings that will serve as a buffer. The zoning code requires open space provided at a minimum of 300 square feet per dwelling unit which may be in the form of private outdoor living areas (balconies, decks) or common recreational areas. Open space requirements are met with a total of 93,180 square feet in the form of pool and common patio areas, open space area between buildings 6 and 12, and private open spaces including patios and balconies. The proposed open space amounts to 456 square feet per unit, which exceeds the 300 square foot minimum. The property will include a 6-foot high perimeter wall on south, west, and north property lines, abutting the existing wall on the eastern boundary. The perimeter wall will be finished similar to the buildings, capped, and feature various landscape treatments.
During the public comment portion in the Planning Commission hearing, neighbors raised concerns about the proximity and privacy of the proposed apartment buildings. The applicant provided section drawings (Attachment 4.2) showing the distances from the existing wall on the property line. Attachment 4.2 also outlines the allowed building envelope, with building as proposed buildings. Comments also included questions about lighting and pets. The lighting plan complies with fixtures within the maximum allowed heights. The applicant confirmed that no dog park is being proposed for the complex although dogs may be permitted within the complex, and dog waste stations provided. Staff analysis concluded proposed building locations and placement of the retention basin provide adequate buffer from adjacent residences.
Architecture
The building will have a contemporary architectural style with a desert modern aesthetic that include metal and wood composite accents, a modern color palette, and flat roofs. Color schemes depend on building type. Minor variations are offered between building type wood siding colors and accent panel colors are either a warm desert green (Big House) or a medium blue (Stack House). Metal frames both the individual balconies and awnings, with metal grid panels providing airy privacy to balconies. The color and materials give a neutral modern aesthetic with color accents that highlight the architectural distinctions.
The R3 zone allows building height not to exceed 35 feet. Building heights vary with the Big House roofs varying from 25 to a 28-foot maximum, and the Stack House varying from 25 to 35-foot maximum. The height variations aid in creating a cohesive aesthetic at an appealing scale.
Pedestrian circulation is provided throughout the development with access to adjacent streets by two pedestrian gates, one at the Rosemount entrance, and one at the northwest corner of the development.
Parking and Circulation
The project complies with the parking requirements of the R3 zone which requires 1.5 spaces per unit; of these at least 1 space per unit shall be covered. Based on the R3 development standards, the project requires a total of 306 parking stalls where at least 204 spaces must be covered. The applicant is providing 192 garage spaces and 100 covered spaces, and 27 uncovered spaces for a total of 319 spaces. Of these, at least 6 spaces are ADA-compliant, meeting the ADA requirement. The project provides 8 EV spaces (1 of which is ADAcompliant) meeting the CALGreen requirement. Parking spaces will be a mix of assigned spaces for residents and un-assigned spaces available to both residents and guests.
The primary entrance for residents and guests will be from Rosemount Road. The intersection of Rosemount Road and Date Palm Drive will be signalized allowing for all vehicle access movements. Pedestrian gates for resident access to Date Palm Drive (NE portion) and to Rosemount Road are proposed.
Landscaping
Desert-appropriate landscape will be provided throughout the project site and along the Date Palm Drive and Rosemount Road rights-of-way as well as along the shared access to the north. The Landscape Plan appears to comply with Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) species list, and the Final Landscape Plan submitted with the building permit application will require CVWD review and approval prior to issuance of building permit. The Landscape Plan includes street trees which comply with the distance and location requirements. Open space standards require a minimum of 300 square feet per dwelling unit which are met by a combination of private outdoor areas, balconies, decks, or common leisure area. The proposal meets these requirements by providing both private and community open space (table attached detailing type of space per unit).
Amenity facilities
The clubhouse is centrally located adjacent to the pool deck area. The clubhouse design is consistent with the architecture, materials, and finish of the residence buildings. The clubhouse features the postal center and multi-use spaces. The clubhouse opens to the patio to the east, and the pool deck to the north. The pool features several shaded lounges, a kiddy pool and spa. Both the pool and spa include ADA lifts. Extending east off the pool area is an open area surrounded by benches and several shade trees. The applicant indicated intent to add a recreational facility in the turf area (pickleball, basketball, or other) depending on the needs and desires of residents.
Airport Land Use Compatibility (ALUC) Plan
The project is within the Zone E of the ALUC Plan area. Compatibility review by the Riverside County Airport Land Use Commission is required for applications within the ALUC Plan Area when a legislative change, such as a General Plan Amendment, is proposed. The Riverside County ALUC board met September 12, 2024, and found the applicant’s request consistent with the 2005 Palm Springs International ALUC Plan with conditions outlined in the attached letter.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:
An initial study and mitigated negative declaration (IS/MND) along with special studies were prepared for the project, pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), by the applicant and peer reviewed by Terra Nova Planning and Research, the City’s environmental consultant. It was determined that the project will not have a significant impact on the environment with the incorporation of mitigation measures, related to Air Quality, Biological Resources, Cultural Resource, Noise, and Tribal Cultural Resources. A mitigated negative declaration is proposed for adoption, along with a mitigation monitoring and reporting plan. The IS/MND and MMRP, along with the special studies prepared for the project are attached to this report, and the specific mitigation measures are incorporated into the attached conditions of approval.
The IS/MND was subject to a 20-day public review period from October 14, 2024 to November 4, 2024 and the City, as the lead agency, received review agency comments. The City received comments from California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, Caltrans, and Southern California Gas.
Response to comments have been attached to this report for all but the Southern California Gas Company letter. Their comments were not related to environmental concerns, rather they related to construction. Therefore, their comments have been incorporated in the conditions of approval.
In conformance with the provisions of AB 52 and SB 18, requiring consultation with Native American Tribes whenever, respectively, a general plan amendment is considered and an environmental initial study/EIR is prepared, staff mailed requests for consultation letters to Native American Tribes. In response, Claritsa Duarte, Cultural Resources Analyst with the Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians (ACBCI) Historic Preservation Office, requested to review copies of all applicable cultural resource documentation, and also requested the presence of an approved Agua Caliente cultural resources monitor during any grounddisturbing activities.
With the incorporation of the following mitigation measure, ACBCI consultation was concluded.
CUL-1: An approved Agua Caliente Native American Cultural Resource Monitor(s) shall be on-site during any ground disturbing activities (including grubbing, grading and excavation).
Should buried cultural deposits be encountered, the Monitor may request that destructive construction halt. The Monitor shall notify a Qualified Archaeologist (Secretary of the Interior’s Standards and Guidelines) to investigate and, if necessary, prepare a mitigation plan for submission to the State Historic Preservation Officer and the Agua Caliente Tribal Historic Preservation Office.
NOTE: The City of Cathedral City Planning Department is custodian of the documents or other material which constitute the record of proceedings upon which this decision is based.
PUBLIC NOTIFICATION:
This project and the environmental determination were noticed in accordance with the City Municipal Code and CEQA for the Planning Commission public hearing and attached to this report.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no fiscal impact as the project is subject to deposit filing fees to cover staff and consultant expenses.
FIVE-YEAR STRATEGIC PLAN:
Goal F - EMBRACING, INCLUSIVE COMMUNITY
Objective: Cathedral City is valued and respected as a community that welcomes and embraces diversity, has an abundance of high quality and affordable housing options and vibrant businesses. Our neighborhoods are attractive, well-maintained, and issues surrounding homelessness have been compassionately addressed with thoughtful, coordinated, and collaborative programs.
Action F-7 Review land use regulations to support diverse, accessible, and affordable housing.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. PC Resolution 2024-05
1.1 City Council Resolution
1.2 City Council Ordinance
2. Conditions of Approval
3. Area map
4. Site/church vicinity map
4.1 Site access – gate
4.2 Section setbacks
5. General Plan and Zoning Maps
6. Site Plan
7. Table of uses
8. Big House - elevations, floor plans
9. Stack House - elevations, floor plans
10. Amenity Buildings - elevations, floor plans
11. Landscape plans
12. Lighting, Grading
13. ALUC Approval
14. Initial Study/MND
14.1 Appendix A - Air Quality Report
14.2 Appendix B – Biological Report
14.3 Appendix C – Cultural Report
14.4 Appendix D-1 – Geological Report.2
14.5 Appendix D-1 Geological Report
14.6 Appendix D-2 – Paleontological Report
14.7 Appendix E-1 – Hydrology Study
14.8 Appendix E-2 – Water Quality Mgmt
14.9 Appendix F – Noise Report
14.10 Appendix G-1 Traffic Impact Analysis
14.11 Appendix G-2 VMT Analysis
14.12 Appendix H – Architectural Plans
14.13 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
15. Response to Comments
16. Southern California Gas Comments
17. Public Hearing Notice
RESOLUTION No. ______
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CATHEDRAL CITY, CALIFORNIA ADOPTING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 23-002 TO REVISE THE LAND USE DESIGNATION OF APPROXIMATELY 10.48 ACRES DESIGNATED AS
CG (GENERAL COMMERCIAL) ON THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP TO RMH (MEDIUM HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL)
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 65300 of the State Planning and Zoning Law (Division 1 Title 7 of the California Government Code) on July 28, 2021, the City of Cathedral City adopted Resolution No. 2021-24 adopting the 2040 General Plan Update to provide comprehensive, longrange planning guidelines for future growth and development which incorporates the following thirteen elements: Land Use, Circulation and Mobility, Housing, Parks and Recreation, Community Design, Arts and Culture, Economic and Fiscal Health, Environmental Justice, Healthy and Sustainable Community, Open Space and Conservation, Air Quality and Climate Stability, Safety, and Public Services and Facilities. Each element of the General Plan provides Goals, Programs, and Policies as required by State Law; and WHEREAS, General Plan Amendment 23-002 proposes to amend the General Plan Land Use Map so that the designation of the approximately 10.48-acre rectangular area along Date Palm Drive, Assessor’s Parcel Number 670-110-043 is designated RMH (Medium High Density Residential, 11-20 du/ac) from CG (General Commercial); and WHEREAS, the RMH (Medium High Density Residential (11-20 du/ac) designation permits multiple-family residential development is proposed for application to the subject site; and WHEREAS, an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program were proposed for the Project subject to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15074; and WHEREAS, on November 20, 2024, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing on General Plan Amendment 23-002 at the City of Cathedral City Council Chambers, and adopted a Resolution recommending that the City Council adopt General Plan Amendment 23-001 to amend the General Plan Land Use Map; and WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CATHEDRAL CITY, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Recitals set forth above are true and correct and incorporated herein by this reference.
Section 2. Based upon the foregoing, oral and written testimony presented by members of the public and City staff (including reports and presentations made at the public hearing), the City Council hereby adopts the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15074, as follows:
1. Based on the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Determination and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program along with the special studies attached in the Appendices, all attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, and an evaluation of the City of Cathedral City’s General Plan, it has been determined the Project will not have a significant impact on the environment.
Section 3. Based upon the foregoing, oral and written testimony presented by members of the public and City staff (including reports and presentations made at the public hearing), the City Council hereby adopts General Plan Amendment 23-002 based on the following findings:
1. The General Plan anticipates periodic revision to ensure City ordinances and policies are maintained in conformance with the General Plan; and
2. The proposed General Plan Amendment would provide additional land designated for housing in accordance with Housing Element Policy 1.A that seeks to ensure the City has sufficient residentially designated land and appropriate zoning exists to meet the City’s housing needs; and
3. The General Plan Amendment would amend the Land Use Map category for approximately 10.48 acres designated on the General Plan Land Use Map as CG (General Commercial) to RMH (Medium High Density Residential); and
4. The proposed General Plan Amendment will allow for additional multi-family residential development consistent with Housing Element Program 1.A.2 --Maintain land use and zoning designations in the General Plan and zoning maps that allow for diversity of housing types and densities.
5. The proposed General Plan Amendment will allow for infill housing development within already urbanized areas of the corporate boundaries of the City consistent with Administration Policy 7 of the General Plan; and
6. The proposed General Plan Amendment is consistent with Policy 3 of the Economic and Fiscal Health Element to encourage higher density infill development which uses existing utilities, infrastructure, and services; and
7. The proposed General Plan Amendment is consistent with Action F-7 of the City’s Strategic Plan to support diverse, accessible, and affordable housing; and
8. Adoption of this General Plan Amendment is not in conflict with Section 65358(b) of the California Government Code relating to the number of amendments permitted per year, because this amendment is the second amendment of calendar year 2024.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION WAS APPROVED AND ADOPTED on this 8 th day of January 2025, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
Nancy Ross, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
Eric S. Vail, City Attorney
Exhibit A
EXHIBIT DEPICTING THE EXTENT SUBJECT TO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL TO AMEND THE LAND USE MAP OF THE GENERAL PLAN 23-002 APN 670-110-043
CHANGE GENERAL PLAN LAND
USE DESIGNATION
FROM: CG
TO: RMH
ORDINANCE NO. ___
ZONING MAP AMENDMENT CZ 23-001
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CATHEDRAL CITY, CALIFORNIA,
ADOPTING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND ADOPTING AN AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING MAP (CHANGE OF ZONE 23-001)
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Cathedral City (the “City Council”) desires to increase housing units available to local residents and workforce members; and WHEREAS, the Zoning Map was adopted by City Council by Ordinance 861 on September 14, 2021; and
WHEREAS, on October 19, 2023, S2 Builders, represented by Stefan Vogel, (“Applicant”) submitted an application to amend the General Plan (GPA 23-002), a Change of Zone (CZ 23- 001) and Design Review 23-002 (“Project”). The Project proposes to construct 12 apartment buildings to include a total of 204 apartment dwelling units, along with a clubhouse, and recreation facilities including a pool and open space; and
WHEREAS, the Change of Zone will support the goals of the General Plan, including the Housing Element, and the City’s Strategic Plan promoting increased housing production; and WHEREAS, an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared for the Project, pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), which determined that the potential impacts to air quality, biological, cultural and Tribal cultural, noise, could be mitigated to levels of insignificance; and
WHEREAS, on November 20, 2024 the City of Cathedral City Planning Commission considered the proposed Project during a duly noticed, regularly scheduled public hearing, and, after considering all evidence, including public testimony, both written and oral, voted to adopt a Resolution recommending that the City Council adopt General Plan Amendment 23-002, Change of Zone 23-001, and approve Design Review 23-002 for the Project; and WHEREAS, on January 8, 2025 the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing to consider the Planning Commission’s recommendation on the Project.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CATHEDRAL CITY DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. CITY COUNCIL RECORD. The City Council has considered all of the evidence, including written and oral communications submitted into the administrative record for the provisions listed in this Ordinance No. _____, including, but not limited to, the following:
1. Cathedral City Municipal Code and Cathedral City General Plan, including the adopted General Plan and Land Use Map;
2. The Staff Report prepared by Cynthia Schultz, including all Exhibits attached thereto;
3. Staff’s presentation at the public hearing conducted at the City Council meeting held on January 8, 2025;
4. Planning Commission Resolution No. PC 2024-05, A Resolution of the Planning Commission of the City of Cathedral City, California Recommending City Council Action on the Project, outlining each recommended action; and
5. Testimony and/or comments on the Project from interested parties including the Applicant and its representatives submitted to the City in both written and oral form at, or prior to, the public hearing conducted at the City Council meeting held on January 8, 2025; and
6. Public comments on the Project, both written and oral, received and/or submitted at, or prior to, the public hearing conducted at the City Council meeting held on January 8, 2025.
SECTION 2. CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT. The City Council hereby adopts an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Measures and Monitoring Program prepared for the Project.
SECTION 3. ZONING MAP AMENDED. The City Council hereby amends the Zoning Map based on the following findings:
1. The City Council considered all of the evidence submitted into the administrative record, which includes, but is not limited to: a) the Staff Report prepared for the Project; b) the staff presentation; c) public comments, both oral and written, received and/or submitted at, or prior to, the public hearing supporting and/or opposing the staff recommendation; and d) testimony and/or comments from the applicant and its representatives submitted to the City in both written and oral form at, or prior to, the public hearing; and
2. The proposed change of zone is in conformity with the General Plan land use map, as amended, and the lot area development standard for the proposed zone is the same as the lot area designated on the General Plan Map for the property, subject to the proposed General Plan Amendment and zone change; and
3. The subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in terms of access, size and shape of parcel, relationship to similar or related uses, and other considerations deemed relevant by the Commission and Council as the project is consistent with applicable zoning standards; and
4. The proposed change of zone to permit the Project is desirable for the development of the community in that it allows diverse housing types and tenure for local residents and workforce, is in harmony with the Housing, Administration, and Land Use Elements or objectives in the General Plan, and is not detrimental to existing uses or to uses specifically permitted in the R3 Zoning District; and SECTION 4. SEVERABILITY If any chapter, section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this ordinance, is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision will not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this ordinance, and each chapter, section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions thereof be declared invalid or unconstitutional.
SECTION 5. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after its second reading by the City Council.
SECTION 6. POSTING. The City Clerk shall, within fifteen (15) days after passage of this Ordinance, cause it to be posted in at least three (3) designated public places; shall certify to the adoption and posting of this Ordinance; and shall cause this Ordinance and its certification, together with proof of posting, to be entered in the Book of Ordinances of this City.
SECTION 7. CERTIFICATION
The foregoing Ordinance was approved and adopted at a meeting of the City Council held on the 8th day of January, 2025, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
______________________________
Nancy Ross, Mayor
ATTEST:
____________________________
Tracey R. Hermosillo, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
____________________________
Eric S. Vail, City Attorney
EXHIBIT A
MAP DEPICTING AREA/PARCEL SUBJECT TO ZONING AMENDMENT
CZ 23-001 AMENDING ZONING DISTRICT FROM PCC TO R3
APN 670-110-043
AMEND ZONING DISTRICT
DESIGNATION
FROM: PCC
TO: R3
CITY OF CATHEDRAL CITY
PLANNING COMMISSION
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 23-002
CHANGE OF ZONE 23-001
DESIGN REVIEW 23-002
THE WREN APARTMENTS
(ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NUMBER 670-110-041)
DATE APPROVED: JANUARY 8, 2025
EXPIRATION DATE: JANUARY 8, 2027
PRESENTED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
SECTION 1 ADMINISTRATIVE CONDITIONS
1.1 General Plan Amendment 23-002 and Change of Zone 23-001 are approved to amend the General Plan land use designation from General Commercial to High Density Residential and change the zone district from Planned Community Commercial to Multiple Family Residential (R3) on 10.5 acres located at the northeast corner of Date Palm Drive and the extension of Rosemount Road.
Design Review 23-002 is approved to construct a 204 apartment project consisting of 12 apartment buildings, a central clubhouse with community facilities, swimming pool and associated deck and outdoor furnishings, carports, trash enclosures and associated improvements
1.2 The plans approved by the Planning Commission are referenced as “Exhibit A”.
The construction drawings shall conform substantially to “Exhibit A” as approved by the Planning Commission/City Council, with the exception of any detail specifically modified by any of the conditions of approval contained herein. Any deviation from” Exhibit A” shall be submitted in writing and approved by the Community and Economic Development Director and/or the City Engineer prior to approval of the construction drawings.
1.3 Approval of Design Review 23-002 shall be valid for two (2) years from date of approval, unless a time extension is timely filed pursuant to the Cathedral City Municipal Code.
1.4 The Applicant shall reimburse the City for any court costs and attorney fees that the City may be required to pay as a result of any legal challenge (or federal enforcement action) related to the City’s approval of the Project. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action, but such participation shall not relieve the operator of its obligation hereunder.
Design Review DR 23-002, GPA 23-001, CZ 23-001 – The Wren Final Conditions of Approval for City Council
January 8, 2025