recommended, on a vote of 7 ayes to 0 nays, that the City Council approve the amendments to The PSP as outlined in Exhibit “A”.
WHEREAS, a notice was published in the Chino Champion newspaper on November 27, 2021, advising the public of a public hearing scheduled before the City Council on December 7, 2021, to consider the Project; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Chino has completed its study of the Project and related materials; and
WHEREAS, on December 7, 2021, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing for the Project in compliance with law, entertained the written and oral report of staff, and took public testimony on the Project; and
WHEREAS, all provisions of the California Government Code and Chino Municipal Code related to the proposed Project have been complied with, including noticed public hearings.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Chino, California, does hereby FIND, DETERMINE, and RESOLVE as follows:
A. The foregoing recitals are true and correct and incorporated herein.
B. Based on substantial evidence, both written and oral, from the public hearing conducted before the Planning Commission, and the public hearing conducted before the City Council, the City Council makes the following findings and takes the following actions on PL21-0026 (Preserve Specific Plan Amendment):
1. PL21-0026 (Preserve Specific Plan Amendment)
a. The proposed specific plan or specific plan amendment is internally consistent with the General Plan, as the proposed changes are to update several sections of The Preserve Specific Plan to better facilitate development south of Pine Avenue. The proposed changes will maintain high standards of community design in The Preserve consistent with Objective General Plan Goal CC-1.1, to “encourage high- quality community design that is responsive to community scale”. The proposed changes and updates to The Preserve Specific Plan will also allow for the continued development in a way that will complement existing development in The Preserve community.
b. The proposed specific plan or specific plan amendment will not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare of the City, as it will aid the development of a variety of housing types and community- oriented land uses consistent with the existing land use designations in The Preserve Specific Plan that will serve all segments of the community.
10.21.c
Adoption of Ordinance No. 2021-015 (PSPA)
Packet Pg. 453
O RDINANCE NO. 2021-015
c. The proposed specific plan or specific plan amendment will maintain the appropriate balance of land uses within the City, as the proposed changes to the specific plan do not include any land use changes, changes in residential densities, or changes to the maximum number of permitted residential units allowed in The Preserve Specific Plan.
d. I
n the case of an amendment to a specific plan land use map, the subject site is physically suitable, including but not limited to parcel size, shape, access, availability of utilities and compatibility with adjoining uses for the requested land use designation and anticipated development. The proposed changes to Preserve Specific Plan do not include any land use changes.
2. The City Council of the City of Chino, California, does hereby ordain as follows:
Section 1: The Preserve Specific Plan is hereby amended as described in Exhibit “B” and Ordinance No. 2003-006 adopting the Preserve Specific Plan, adopted on April 1 , 2003, as amended, including most recently by Ordinance No. 2016-013 adopted on October 18, 2016, is hereby further amended to implement the changes described in Exhibit “B”.
Section 2 : If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this Ordinance is held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such determination shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Chino declares that they would have enacted this Ordi nance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase hereof, irrespective of any determination of invalidity.
Section 3: The City Clerk of the City of Chino shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published in a newspaper of general circulation, printed and published within said City in accordance with the provisions of the Government Code.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 4TH DA
Y OF JANUARY 2022.
EUNICE M. ULLOA, MAYOR
A
TTEST:
ANGELA ROBLES, CITY CLERK
10.21.c
Adoption of Ordinance No. 2021-015 (PSPA)
Packet Pg. 454
O RDINANCE NO. 2021-015
S
tate of California )
County of San Bernardino ) §
City of Chino )
I, A ngela Robles, City Clerk of the City of Chino, do hereby certify the foregoing Ordinance was duly adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting held on the 4th day of January 2022 by the following votes.
AYES: CO
UNCIL MEMBERS:
N
OES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSEN
T: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ANGELA ROBLES, CITY CLERK
E
xhibit A – List of Changes to The Preserve Specific Plan Exhibit B – The Preserve Specific Plan
10.21.c
Adoption of Ordinance No. 2021-015 (PSPA)
Packet Pg. 455
Tracking List of Changes to Preserve Specific Plan for 2021 SPA Dated: 11/5/2021
Prepared by JTM
Note: Refer to Redline SP Draft for more detail on miscellaneous text changes.
Page # Figure # Changes
V-XIII TABLE OF CONTENTS
Updated to address all pagination changes.
SECTION I VISION
No changes made.
Section III EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
11 Figure 1A Land Use Plan - Revised Main Street below Pine Avenue.
Figures 1B & 1C Deleted out of date Conceptual Images of Community Core.
SECTION III INTRODUCTION & BACKGROUND
17 Corrected date for Resolution No 2016-021.
21 Added note on SCE facilities in addition to the SCE Corridor. 28 Figure 5 Adjacent Land Uses updated to reflect changes in Eastvale.
SECTION IV DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT
35 Corrected verbiage on Trails.
36 Guiding Principles Text moved from page 36 to page 50 37 7 Land Use Plan - Revised Main Street below Pine Avenue. 39 & 40 Tables 1 General clean-up of the acreages for LI, Ag, and PF Zones.
Revised verbiage relating to 3rd School Site location
41 Table 2 Revised note added regarding status of 3rd School Site.
SECTION V DEVELOPMENT PLAN
55 GRD1 Parking Note GRD 1 d added.
56 GRD5 Recreational Vehicle (RV) Parking:
This verbiage was moved from each of the zoning categories and placed at this location to avoid repetition. 57-60 Table 3
Segmented Development Rqmnts:
Title for Detached Cluster shortened and Sub note 26 added.
Horizontal Line added to the top of each page for ease of reference.
Minimum Net Lot Size: revised N/A to None under HDR20 to be consistent with other columns.
Front Setbacks:
New line for Single Level Habitable (and Sub note 27) added to encourage single level massing.
Front Entry Garage - verbiage slightly revised for more clarity.
Side Setbacks:
Expanded note unde HDR16 Detached Cluster/Attached for more clarity.
New Line for Covered Patio Setbacks added to Table.
New Line for Single Level Habitable added to encourage single level massing.
Rear Setbacks:
New Line for Covered Patio Setbacks added to Table.
Private Open Space:
Minimum Private Open Space: Minimum Dimension added to LDR. 57-60 Table 3
Sub notes:
Sub note 2 revised to include 60 Acre Minimum size for a Master Plan.
Sub note 3 expanded in regards to setbacks associated with parking structures.
Sub note 9 expanded to include livable over garages.
Sub note 10 revised to clarify that a project may inlucde more than one Zoning Category.
Sub note 16 added to allow for private open solutions split into more than one level in HDR.
Sub note 23 added to encourage 6' deep porches in MDR, & HDR16/20/30 to be setback 4' from PL.
Sub note 26 added to further describe Detached Cluster products with Condominium Maps.
Sub note 27 added to clarify percentage of Single Level Habitable with reduced Front Setbacks.
Sub note 28 added to clarify Private Open Space in MDR when split on more than one level.
Sub note 29 added to clarify conditions of setbacks to interior property lines.
Sub note 30 refers to Design Guidelines for additional setback information on garages with rear access. 61 ER Zone
ER2 Revised d and added notes g and h.
ER3 Added note c.
ER5 Added note b and corrected ZC reference.
Removed verbiage on Cluster Products from ER Section.
Moved LDR Performance Standards to LDR Section.
Moved RV Parking verbiage to GRD5.
EXHIBIT "A" 10.21.c
Adoption of Ordinance No. 2021-015 (PSPA)
Packet Pg. 456
Page # Figure # Changes
62 ER Zone Removed Cluster Product Graphic from ER Section as this product is not likely to be built in ER Zone. 63 LDR Zone
LDR2 Added notes e, h, & i.
LDR3 added notes b & c.
LDR5 Revised notes b & c.
Moved RV Parking verbiage to GRD5.
64 LDR Zone Replaced Cluster Graphic with more accurate representation of potential product. 67 MDR Zone
MDR2 Added notes h & I.
MDR3 Added note e.
MDR5 Added note b.
Moved RV Parking verbiage to GRD5.
66 MDR Zone Replaced Cluster Graphic with more accurate representation of potential product. 69 HDR16 Zone HDR16-2 Added notes h & I.
Moved RV Parking verbiage to GRD5.
70 HDR16 Zone Replaced Cluster Graphic with more accurate representation of potential product. 71 HDR20 Zone
HDR20-2 Added notes d & e and revised note b.
HDR20-3 Added note b.
HDR20-5 Added note b.
72 HDR20 Zone Replaced Cluster Graphic with more accurate representation of potential product. 73 HDR30 Zone HDR30-2 Added notes d & e.
HDR30-7 Added notes a, b, & c.
76-77 Table 4
Sub notes:
4 Clarified CC16 & CC30 Zone Category requirements.
10 Clarified setbacks for Industrial, density ranges, and FAR 11 Clarified Airport and LI Zoning.
87 Director of Public Works title revised to City Engineer - typical 108 Figure 9B Updated Agricultural Overlay Exhibit.
110-136 Figure 10A Circulation Plan - Updated with new Street Section changes. 138 Figure 12 Truck Routes - Updated based on previous approvals. 139-140 Added notes on Transit Mobility, Bicycle Mobility, and Pedestrian Mobility. 140 Updated Rancho Miramonte Perimeter Buffer Trail Image. 141 Figure 13 Re-Titled this image to High Priority Transit Corridor. 142 Figure 14 Bicycle Plan updated to clarify locations of various types of Bicycle Paths. 143 Figure 15 Equestrian Plan updated to reflect changes at Legacy Park/Hellman; Kimball/Euclid; Hellman north of Kimball. 144 Added verbiage regarding Class I Bicycle facilities. 147 Figure 16 Paseo and Open Space System Plan updated to reflect changes near Legacy Park Street & Hellman. 148 Updated Unit Count and Population Count to match Table 2. 149 Sentence added to clarify concept of added park land located under the dam inundation line. 152 Figure 17 Conceptual Parks and Schools Plan updated to reflect updates to park and school locations and sizes.
Sentence added regarding status of 3rd school site.
154 Sentence added in regards to the most recent UWMP.
155 Date corrected to refer to the 2003 Water Supply Assessment. 156 Figure 19 Domestic Water System updated to match latest DIF Exhibit. 157 Date corrected to refer to the 2009 Edgewater Specific Plan. 158 Figure 20 Reclaimed Water System updated to match latest DIF Exhibit. 160 Figure 21 Sanitary Sewer Plan updated to match latest DIF Exhibit. 163 Figure 22 Storm Drainage Plan updated to match latest DIF Exhibit.
SECTION VI DESIGN GUIDELINES
176 Figure 23 Landscape Structure Plan updated to reflect changes to Main Street. 179 Gateway Image Updated Gateway Image to match concept approved for Preserve Town Center.
SECTION VII ADMINISTRATION
206 Range of units in a typical detached neighborhood expanded from 50-8-to 30-80 to allow for some smaller parcels.
SECTION VII GLOSSARY
224 Added definition for Habitable
10.21.c
Adoption of Ordinance No. 2021-015 (PSPA)
Packet Pg. 457
TTM 16420
A Map)
Disclaimer:
Acreages shown are at the planning level.
Refer to final maps for actual net acreages
Lot 6
Tract xxxxx
Harvest
Gardens
62 Du
4.69 Ac
13.22 Du/Ac
Mission
Pointe
Church
Tract 17572
7.21 Ac
Tract 16420-1
Apartments
Homecoming
799 Du
51.83 Ac
15.42 Du/Ac
Formerly
Designated
Neighborhood
Commercial
Zone
10.21.d
Adoption of Ordinance No. 2021-015 (PSPA)
Packet Pg. 458
6 6 14 312
BikeTravelway
12
High Priority Transit Route
2016 Street Section
2021 Street Section
2016 STREET SECTION O COMPARISON TO 2021
10.21.d
Adoption of Ordinance No. 2021-015 (PSPA)
Packet Pg. 459